COMMITTEE ON            EPA/542/R-99/007
      THE CHALLENGES OF          September 1999
      MODERN SOCIETY             www.clu-in.org
                            www.nato.int/ccms
   NATO/CCMS Pilot Study
      Evaluation of Demonstrated and
       Emerging Technologies for the
     Treatment of Contaminated Land
       and Groundwater (Phase

                 1999
           ANNUAL REPORT
              Number 235
NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION

-------
               1999
          Annual Report
     NATO/CCMS Pilot Study
 Evaluation of Demonstrated and Emerging
Technologies for the Treatment and Clean Up
  of Contaminated Land and Groundwater
             (Phase III)
            Angers, France
            May 9-14, 1999
           September 1999

-------
                                         NOTICE
This Annual Report was prepared under the auspices of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization's
Committee on the Challenges of Modern Society (NATO/CCMS) as a service to the technical community
by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA). The report was funded by U.S. EPA's
Technology Innovation Office  under the  direction of Ann  Eleanor. The report  was  produced by
Environmental Management Support, Inc., of Silver Spring, Maryland, under U.S. EPA contract 68-W6-
0014. Mention of trade names or specific applications does not imply endorsement or acceptance by U.S.
EPA.

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)              September 1999
                                           CONTENTS


INTRODUCTION	1

PROJECTS INCLUDED IN NATO/CCMS PHASE HI PILOT STUDY	3

  Summary Table	4
  Project 1: Bioremediation of Oil Polluted Loamy Soil	6
  Project 2:  Pilot Test on Decontamination of Mercury Polluted Soil	15
  Project 3:  Permeable Treatment Beds	19
  Project 4:  Rehabilitation of Land Contaminated by Heavy Metals	22
  Project 5:  Application of Biowalls/Bioscreens	27
  Project6:  Rehabilitation of a Site Contaminated by PAH Using Bio-Slurry Technique	31
  Project 7:  Risk Assessment for a Diesel-Fuel Contaminated Aquifer Based on
             Mass Flow Analysis During Site Remediation	33
  Project 8:  Obstruction of Expansion of a Heavy Metal/Radionuclide Plume Around a
             Contaminated Site by means of Natural Barriers Composed of Sorbent Layers	35
  Project 9:  Solidification/Stabilization of Hazardous Wastes	40
  Project 10: Metal-biofihn Interactions in Sulphate Reducing Bacterial Systems	43
  Proj ect 11: Predicting the Potential for Natural Attenuation of Organic Contaminants in Groundwater	49
  Project 12: Treatability Test for Enhanced In Situ Anaerobic Dechlorination	53
  Project 13: Permeable Reactive Barriers for In Situ Treatment of Chlorinated Solvents	59
  Project 14: Thermal Cleanups using Dynamic Underground Stripping and Hydrous Pyrolysis/Oxidation	62
  Project 15: Phytoremediation of Chlorinated Solvents	70
  Project 16: In-Situ Heavy Metal Bioprecipitation	76
  Project 17: GERBER Site	79
  Project 18: SAFIRA	81
  Project 19: Successive Extraction - Decontamination of Leather Tanning Waste Deposited Soil	84
  Project 20: Interagency DNAPL Consortium Side-by-Side Technology Demonstrations at Cape Canaveral, FL 86

COUNTRY TOUR DE TABLE PRESENTATIONS	91
  Armenia	92
  Austria	94
  Belgium	96
  Canada	100
  Czech Republic	101
  Denmark	107
  France	Ill
  Germany	118
  Hungary	122
  Japan	127
  The Netherlands	131
  Norway	135
  Romania	138
  Slovenia	144
  Sweden	155
  Switzerland	159
  Turkey	163
  United Kingdom	 166
  United States of America	171

COUNTRY REPRESENTATIVES	176

ATTENDEES LIST	179

PILOT STUDY MISSION	185

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)             September 1999

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)              September 1999
                                       INTRODUCTION

The Council of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) established the Committee on the Challenges
of Modem Society (CCMS) in 1969. CCMS was charged with developing meaningful programs to share
information among countries on environmental and societal issues that complement other international
endeavors and to provide leadership in solving specific problems of the human environment. A fundamental
precept of CCMS involves the transfer of technological and scientific solutions among nations with similar
environmental challenges.

The management of contaminated land and groundwater is a universal problem among industrialized countries,
requiring the use of existing, emerging, innovative, and cost-effective technologies. This document reports on
the second meeting of the Phase HI Pilot Study on the Evaluation of Demonstrated and Emerging Technologies
forme Treatment and Clean Up of Contaminated Land and Groundwater. The United States is the lead country
for the Pilot Study, and Germany and The Netherlands are the Co-Pilot countries. The first phase successfully
concluded in 1991, and the results were published in three volumes. The second phase, which expanded to
include newly emerging technologies, concluded in 1997; final reports documenting 52 completed projects
and the participation of 14 countries were published in June  1998. Through these  pilot studies, critical
technical information was made available to participating countries and the world community.

The Phase III study focuses on the technologies for treating contaminated land and groundwater.  This Phase
is addressing issues of sustainability, environmental merit, and cost-effectiveness, in addition to continued
emphasis on emerging remediation technologies. The objectives of the study  are to critically evaluate
technologies, promote the appropriate use of technologies, use information technology systems to disseminate
the products, and to foster innovative thinking in the area of contaminated land. The Phase III Mission
Statement is provided at the end of this report.

The first meeting of the Phase III Pilot was held in Vienna, Austria, on February 23-27, 1998. The meeting
included a special technical session on treatment walls and permeable reactive barriers. The proceedings of
the meeting and a companion document on the special technical session were published in May  1998.

The second meeting of the Phase III Pilot Study convened in Angers, France, on May 9-14,  1999, with
representatives of 18 countries attending. Ten of the participating countries presented 15 projects to the Pilot
Study. These projects were discussed and commented on by experts. Five additional projects were also
proposed and selected for inclusion in the Pilot Study. A special technical session was convened on monitored
natural attenuation. The proceedings of that special session are available in a companion publication.

This publication represents the  second  Annual  Report of the  Phase  HI Pilot Study. It contains updated
summaries of the 20 projects as well as reports on the legislative, regulatory, programmatic, and research issues
related to contaminated land in each participating country.

You can obtain general information on the NATO/CCMS Pilot Study from the Country Representatives listed
at the end of this report. For detailed questions on an individual project, please consult the technical contact
listed  in  each  project summary.  Many  of  the  Pilot Study reports  are  also  available  online  at
http://www.nato.int/ccms/.

                                                    Stephen C. James
                                                    Walter W. Kovalick, Jr., Ph.D.
                                                    Co-Directors

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)             September 1999

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)            September 1999
            PROJECTS INCLUDED IN NATO/CCMS PHASE III PILOT STUDY

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)
September 1999
                                   SUMMARY TABLE

PROJECT
1 . Bioremediation of Loamy Soils
Contaminated with
Hydrocarbons and Derivatives
2. Mercury-Contaminated
Spolchemie Plant
3. Permeable Treatment Beds
4. Rehabilitation of Land
Contaminated by Heavy Metals
5. Application of
BioWalls/BioScreens
6. Rehabilitation of a Site
Contaminated by PAH Using
Bio-Slurry Technique
7. Risk Assessment for a
Diesel-Fuel Contaminated
Aquifer Based on Mass Flow
Analysis During the Course of
Remediation
8. Obstruction of Expansion of a
Heavy Metal/Radionuclide
Plume Around a Contaminated
Site by Means of Natural
Barriers Composed of Sorbent
Layers
9. Solidification/ Stabilization of
Hazardous Wastes
10. Metals Biofilms Interactions in
Sulfate-Reducing Bacterial
Systems
11. Predicting the Potential for
Natural Attenuation of Organic
Contaminants in Groundwater
12. Treatability of Enhanced In Situ
Anaerobic Dechlorination
13. Permeable Reactive Barriers for
In Situ Treatment of Chlorinated
Solvents
14. Thermal Cleanups Using
Dynamic Underground Stripping
and Hydrous Pyrolysis/Oxidation

COUNTRY
Belgium
Czech
Germany
Greece
Netherlands
Sweden
Switzerland
Turkey
Turkey
UK
UK
USA
USA
USA
MEDIUM
'o
CO
/
/

/

/

/
/




/
Groundwater

/
/

/

/
/

/
/
/
/
/
CONTAMINANT
in
O
O


/

/





/
/
/
/
in
CJ
o
CO
/
/
/

/
/


/

/
/


Pesticides/PCBs




/



/




/
(/>
o
^
Q_
/

/

/

/



/



in
o
'c
ca
CT>
|

/
/
/

/

/
/
/
/

/


NOTES
PAHs, munitions
chemicals
Hg, metals, PAHs,
TPH
PAHs, BTEX, TCE,
PCE
Pb, Zn, Cd, As, H*,
S04=
Chlorinated
pesticides, BTEX,
TPH, HCH, PCE, TCE
PAHs, cyanides,
metals, ammonium
compounds
PHC
Pb, As, Cr, Cu, Cd,
Hg, Ni, Zn; 137Cs, 90Sr,
238(J
PCBs, AOX, metals
Metals (Cu, Zn, Cd),
radionuclides (Lab-
scale)
Coal tars, phenols,
creosol, xylenols,
BTEX, NH4+
TCE, DCE, VC, PCE
PCE, TCE, DCE
PAHs, fuels, gasoline,
chlorinated solvents,
pentachlorophenol

COMPLETE













/

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)
                               September 1999

PROJECT
15. Phytoremediation of Chlorinated
Solvents
16. In-Situ Heavy Metal
Precipitation
17. GerberSite
18. SAFIRA
19. Successive Extraction -
Decontamination of Leather
Tanning Waste Deposited Soil
20. Interagency DNAPL
Consortium Side-by-Side
Technology Demonstrations at
Cape Canaveral, FL

COUNTRY
USA
Belgium
France
Germany
Turkey
USA
MEDIUM
'o
CO


/



Groundwater
/
/
/
/

/
CONTAMINANT
in
CJ
o
>
/

/
/
/
/
in
CJ
O
CO


/



Pesticides/PCBs


/



in
CJ
^
Q.






in
.-
co
CD
1

/
/

/


NOTES
TCE, TCA, DCE,
PCE, xylenes, methyl
chloride, TMB
Heavy Metals (Zn, Cd,
As, Pb, Cr, Ni, Cu,
sulfate)
Chlorinated solvents,
BTEX, PCBs,
phenols, phthalates,
Pb, Zn
Complex
contamination,
chlorobenzene
Tanning Wastes
DNAPLs

COMPLETE






KEY:
        AOX = adsorptive organic halogens
        BTEX  = benzene,  toluene,  ethylbenzene,
        and xylenes
        DCE = dichloroethene
        HCH = hexachlorocyclohexane
        PAHs = polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
        PCBs = polychlorinated biphenyls
        PCE = tetrachloroethene
PHCs = petroleum hydrocarbons
SVOCs = semivolatile organic compounds
TMB = trimethylbenzene
TCA = trichloroethane
TCE = trichloroethene
VC = vinyl chloride
VOCs = volatile organic compounds

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)
September 1999
Project No. 1
Bioremediation of Oil Polluted Loamy Soil
Location
"van Oss" site
former fuel storage depot
Neder-Over-Heembeeck
Technical contact
Ecorem nv
Dr. Walter Mondt
ir. Serge Van Meerbeeck
Wayenborgstraat 2 1
2800 Mechelen
Tel: 015/29.49.29
Fax: 015/29.49.28
E-mail: Ecorem@glo.be
Project Status
final report
proposal future pilot project
Project Dates
accepted 1994
final Report 1997
Costs Documented?
yes
Media
loamy soil
Contaminants
mineral oil
Technology Type
bioremediation

Project Size
full scale
(proposal future pilot project)
1. INTRODUCTION

Name of the technology: Bioremediation of oil polluted loamy soil.

Status of the technology: Highly innovative and reasonable costs. Further experiments are required to evaluate
different bioremediation techniques for the decontamination of loamy soil.

Project Objectives: Decontamination of oil polluted loamy soil by an in-situ activated biorestoration system,
composed of a bioventing and a biostimulation system.

Following the good  decontamination results on the van Oss site, this project is considered as a first step
towards a more general and more effective application of bioremediation of contaminated loamy soils. In
collaboration with the ULB (Universite libre de Bruxelles) Ecorem proposed a pilot project to NATO, with
objective to examine which bioremediation techniques could efficiently be used in the decontamination of
loamy soils polluted with hydrocarbons.

2. SITE DESCRIPTIONS

The van Oss site is a former fuel storage depot in Neder-over-Heembeek, contaminated with mineral oil. A
topographical situation of the site is shown on FIGURE 1.

3. DESCRIPTION  OF THE PROCESS

Based upon a reconnoitring soil examination, it was proven mat the soil as well as the groundwater of the
former fuel storage  depot « van Oss »  was seriously contaminated with mineral  oil.  Compared to the
contamination with this parameter, the presence of oilier components present was negligible.

The  volume of contaminated  soil (unsaturated  zone)  was estimated,  based  on the  reconnoitring soil
examination, at  3.500m3. Proceeding with these data, selective excavation of the contaminated zones was a
first option to be considered.
In order to draw up a detailed proposal for decontamination, Ecorem proposed an elaborated analysis campaign
based on a sample grid.

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)              September 1999
Based on the analytical results and the positioning of the grid the volume of contaminated soil was assessed.
Table 1 gives an overview of the volumes of contaminated soil. In Figure 3 the horizontal spreading of the
mineral oil contamination in the soil is represented.

        Table 1 Overview of the volumes of contaminated soil (mineral oil)
&j$&isp$f»8Jfi& wSM'm-wimnM felMfeAy&P
Depth ( cm)
0-200

0-250

0-300


9231m3
14770 tons
10997m3
17995 tons
12763m3
20420 tons

6284m3
10054 tons
6997m3
11 196 tons
7711m3
12338 tons

943 m3
15 09 tons
1050m3
1680 tons
1156m3
1850 tons
The cubing shows that the volumes of contaminated soil were considerably higher than estimated at first. As
a result, Ecorem proposed an alternative decontamination technique, i.e. an in-situ activated biorestoration
system composed of a bioventing and a biostimulation system. Bioventing consists of a forced air flushing of
the unsaturated soil with as main objective the supply of oxygen in order to stimulate the biodegrading activity
of the microorganisms present in the  soil.  The biostimulation  in this project consisted of mixing  the
contaminated ground with compost and wood flakes, in  order to obtain a porous matrix, and the addition of
nutrients to enhance microbial activity.

Decontamination of the unsaturated zone consisted of the following stages:

a)  Excavation of the hot spots

Hot spots (areas with severe contamination - here areas where the concentration of mineral oil  >5000mg/kg
DS) are secondary sources of contamination,  and can therefore inhibit the efficient functioning of an in-situ
decontamination technique. It is thus essential that these secondary sources of contamination are removed, for
the in-situ decontamination technique to have any chance of success.

b) Biodegradation

The efficiency of the biodegradation system strongly depends on soil characteristics. In  order to obtain a good
biological degrading, the oxygen level and level of nutrients need to be established in  optima forma.

A good supply of oxygen can only be realised  in porous soils. Soils with  limited air  permeability,  such as
loamy soils, therefore need to be mixed with structure amelioration additives. Oxygen  is necessary for
hydrocarbon  degradation,  as this  is done aerobically. Oxygen limitation leads to slowing  down and
discontinuing of the degradation kinetics. The creation of good air permeability is also of crucial importance
for the bioventing.

A second parameter, the nutrient supply is just as essential for a good biodegradation. In order to optimise the
feeding pattern the soil should be mixed with bioactivating substrates.

c) Soil air extraction

The efficiency and the design of the soil air extraction strongly depend on the soil characteristics,  as these have
an important effect on the movement and transportation of soil air (gas). The most important determining soil
                                              7

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)             September 1999

characteristics are:  soil structure, stratigraphy, porosity, grain size; water level, residual contamination and
presence of macro pores.

The air permeability of the soil represents the effect of these different soil characteristics. The air permeability
indicates to what extent fumes can float through a porous environment.

Air permeability and airflow velocity are linearly dependent. The higher the air permeability and the airflow
velocity, the greater the chances of an effective soil air extraction.

Taking into account that the loamy / clayey unsaturated zone at the van Oss site is heterogeneously built, the
air transportation throughout the soil is prevented and  the airflow velocity is relatively small. A solution to
break this heterogeneity was to mix this oil with structure-enhancing additives till the depth of 0.5 m above
ground water level. This also enlarged the porosity of the soil, which was favourable for air transportation.

In order to get a large zone of influence, the placement of horizontal injection and withdrawal drains was
chosen.  Placement of drains was performed in  layers, the soil mixed with structure-enhancing additives being
completed (FIGURE 2)

The withdrawn air was purified in an air treatment establishment, consisting of following units:

        Air/water separator and air filter

        This separator and filter eliminates  soil damp (water) and  fine particles  that may damage the
        mechanical equipment, and might disrupt  further air treatment.  The water discerned needs to  be
        collected and, if contaminated, purified.

        Vacuum pump

        The vacuum pump causes the suction  in the underground. The compression heat in the pump causes
        a temperature increase and a corresponding decrease of the relative humidity of the airflow when
        leaving the blower.

        Air cleaning unit

        The pumped up air was treated by means of biofiltration and active carbon filtration.

        Measure devices

        By measuring the different parameters the air  treatment and soil  air extraction could constantly be
        monitored and adjusted.

The above mentioned decontamination concept has a double advantage:

   It avoids transportation of considerable  volumes of contaminated soil (approx. 12.000 tons with a
   concentration higher than  lOOOmgkg DM) to an adapted dumping-ground;

   It relocates the problem of the desired quality from a problem of volume to a problem of time. The final
   quality of the soil is function of the time period in which the system is applied.

The complete decontamination setting is represented in FIGURE 2.

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)              September 1999

4. RESULTS AND EVALUATION

The bioremediation of the unsaturated zone was started in October 1995, after the hot spots had been excavated
and the remaining  soil had been mixed with compost and wood flakes. After two months a first analysis
campaign was executed. The results have been visually represented in FIGURE 3. Further analysis campaigns
were executed after 5 and after 10 months. These results have been represented in FIGURE 4 and FIGURE
5. Based on the visual representation of the horizontal spread of the contamination in the different figures it
has become clear that the bioremediation technique is successful.

After ten months the mean concentration of mineral oil was less man 490 ppm. while the decontamination
objective imposed by the BIM was a concentration of 900 ppm.

From these results it is clear that bioremediation techniques can be efficient on loamy soil on short term, so
that further examination for possible  bioremediation techniques on finer textures offers quite a lot of
perspective.

5. COSTS

The bioremediation technique was also a favourable concept regarding the cost of decontamination. The total
cost for bioremediation of the unsaturated area amounted to about 20 million franks. A selective excavation
of the contaminated grounds would have easily exceeded a 30 million franks" cost price.

6. PROPOSAL OF A PILOT PROJECT ON BIOREMEDIATION OF LOAMY SOIL

Following the decontamination at the van Oss site. Ecorem proposed to NATO a pilot project, with objective
to verify which bioremediation techniques are effective in the decontamination of contaminated loamy soils.

In order to dimension the different technologies to be tested in the scope of this pilot project, the following
activities are planned prior to the experimental stage:

   characterisation of the soil to be treated

   This stage consists of the analysis of the soil to be treated, regarding the most relevant organic and
   inorganic parameters. Therefore, a number of samples will be taken. A good characterisation is necessary
   because certain pollutants, even in low concentrations, have a certain inhibiting effect on the microbial
   activity. Complementary to these analyses a certain number of general parameters such as grain size, the
   C/N relation and the degree of humidity will be determined as well.

   determination of initial microbial activity

   The determination of initial microbial activity is performed based on the classical techniques used in soil
   microbiology, such as microscopical research (countings), determination of the biomass by fumigation and
   extraction, respiration measurements (CO2 production) and ATP determinations.

   Determination  of the maximum potential biodegradability of the contamination present

   In order to determine the maximum degradability of the pollutants, column tests with lysimeters are being
   executed. Therefore  optimal conditions for microbial growth and degradation are created by means of
   addition of water, nutrients, air, microorganisms and other additives. During the column tests the pollutant

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)              September 1999

    concentration, the use of oxygen and the CO2 production are continuously monitored in order to obtain
    an accurate image of the biodegradability of the pollutants.

The preparatory stages will result in a first indication of the  potential applicability of bioremediation as a
decontamination technique for loamy soils that were contaminated with hydrocarbons.

Based on the results and conclusions of the preparatory stages a number of decontamination concepts and
configurations will be tested on a lab scale. Regarding the in-situ decontamination techniques, this is only
executed with  the  help of column studies based  on soil column  lysimeters. Regarding  the ex-situ
decontamination techniques, mainly bioreactor tests will be executed.

Soil column lysimeters are simple but efficient means to verify the possibilities to what extent the soil can be
in-situ decontaminated with the help of bioremediation techniques. In FIGURE 6 a schematic representation
of the test setting is given. Different soil columns are being equipped as represented in FIGURE 6. In the test
setting fluid solutions can be put in with the help of a time-directed system mat is established on top of each
column. Furthermore, air fumes can be added in each column.  Before entering the column, the fumes are lead
through a shaft filled with glass pearls to enable a uniform separation. Different column tests will be performed
simultaneously to monitor the microbial activity and the evolution of the contaminants under different
circumstances and feedings. The liquid solutions will mainly consist of nutrient mixtures containing nitrogen
sources, phosphates and oligo-elements.  For each column the effluent is collected  and analysed on pH,
conductivity and nutrient concentrations. In order to measure microbial activity in the column, the production
of CO2 produced is determined. On the columns following treatments will be performed : control  setting
without specific treatment; only addition of water, addition of water and nutrients, addition of water + nutrients
+ microorganisms; addition of water + air + nutrients; addition of water + microorganisms + air + nutrients.

Such  soil column lysimeters are extremely well  equipped to verify whether contaminated  sites can be
decontaminated in-situ with the help of bioremediation techniques. In addition, the  column tests will be used
for the evaluation of ex-situ decontamination techniques, during which the contaminated soil will be submitted
to different preliminary treatments (e.g. mixing with compost). Different compost formulas and relationships
in the process will be tested.

Based on the results of the experiments on a lab scale, the most appropriate concepts will be tested on a larger
scale, in order to obtain a more realistic idea. Therefore the ex-situ decontamination techniques will be tested
in the soil-recycling centre. Regarding the in-situ decontamination techniques, the different contaminated zones
in different sites will be isolated  civil-technically  in  order to prevent a horizontal spreading  of the
contamination. The volume of isolated cells will amount to approximately 50m3. In order to prevent spreading
towards the ground water, a pump and injection system are established around different cells. If possible slots
will be dug to the depth of 2 to 3 m around the cells. From these slots horizontal perforated tubes will be
installed under the cells to enable monitoring of the groundwater as well as of the soil vapour. With this
sampling system the heterogeneity of the soil can be optimally studied.

This decontamination experiments will be conducted on the future soil-recycling centre of s.a. Ecoterres in
Brussels. This centre will be built on the van Oss site, owned by the G.O.M.B. FIGURE 7 gives an impression
of the future soil-recycling centre.
                                              10

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)
September 1999
Figure 1
         FIG. 1: LOCATION OF 'SITE VAN OSS' ON THE TOPOGRAPHICAL MAP
Figure 2
               FIG- 2. LAY-OUT OF THE SANtTATlON ARRANGEMEMT
                                            11

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)
September 1999
Figure 3
                           BowntfWfax Kfn
                                                                         IWOpp-
                                                                         HQcpn

                                                                         WQcpn
     IG.3:DI3fERSATION OF HYOHOCARBOtS ATTER 2 MONTHS OF BIOREMED1ATIOISI
                     (gorKWrtrflton of hydrowrt»ns in rng'kg DM)
Figure 4
         DISPERT1ON OF WYDROCARBONS AFTER 5 MONTHS OF BIOREMEOIATION
                   (corHMfttrafcon of hydrocartxxis In  tot mgneg DM)
                                             12

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)
   September 1999
Figure 5
          FIG-5: DISP€RTAT»0«S! OF HYDROCARBOB AFTER 10 MONTHS OF
            BKJREMEDIATION (ocmoen»Htkxi of riyOnxaftona m nf»9/H8 DM)
Ecorem
Figure 6
                      FIG.6: SCHEME OF TESTING LINE-UP
                                                                             Ecorem
                                            13

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase I
September 1999
Figure 7
         FIG 1- IMPRESS*QN Of THE FUTURE SOIL REMEDIATION CEWTER
                                          14

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)
                                                    September 1999
 Project No. 2
                     Pilot Test on Decontamination of Mercury Polluted Soil
 Location
 Active Chlor-alkali Plant
 Usti nad Labem, Czech Rep.
Project Status
Active Project
Contaminants
Metallic Mercury
Technology Type
Gravity Separation
 Technical Contact
 Miroslav Sedlacek
 Jan Va« a
 KAP spol. s r.o.
 Skokanska 80
 16900Praha6
 Czech Republic
 Tel: +420-2-52 74 03
 Fax: +420-2-57 21 12 55
 E-mail:
 m. sedlacek@prg.kap.cz
 j .vana@prg.kap.cz	
Project Dates
Accepted 1998
Phase 1 carried out
in 1998
Media
Soil
Costs Documented?
Partly
Project Size
Semi-operating
(up to 5 t)
Results Available?
Partly
1. INTRODUCTION

This Pilot Test on Decontamination of Mercury Polluted Soil is regarded as a semi-operating demonstration
of a progressive and economical technique for on-site cleanup.

2. BACKGROUND

In 1998 an investigation of pollution and risk assessment was completed in the area of plant Spolchemie, a.s.,
located in the center of Usti nad Labem in NW Bohemia. High-grade elemental Hg pollution of soil was found
in areas adjacent to the former and current buildings of the mercury-cell process for producing caustic soda,
caustic potash, hydrogen and chlorine. Maximum concentrations of mercury often reach up to hundreds of
thousands ppm. Total amount of Hg is 267 - 445 tons in 222,740 mj of polluted soil. The mercury is present
in the form of visible drops or softly dispersed in the soil. The  scale and character of the pollution has been
presented in previous papers in detail. The scale  of the cleanup project has not been  decided yet but it has been
proposed to excavate polluted soil to a  depth of 5 m and subsequent decontamination and encapsulation of the
lower levels of pollution or monitoring only. A feasibility study evaluating decontamination methods used
worldwide was performed. Due to a lack of experience with mercury polluted soil decontamination in the
Czech Republic, a Project on Research on Decontamination of Mercury Polluted Soils was elaborated. This
project has been divided in  two phases - Phase 1 has been  focusing on laboratory testing  of a gravity
centrifugal concentrator (Knelson) and thickening of treated soil. Phase 2 - Pilot Test on Decontamination of
Mercury  Polluted Soil should test the wet gravity decontamination on a semi-operating scale.

The project is funded completely by National Property Fund of Czech Republic with assumed total  cost of
490,000 CZK (17,250 USD).

3. TECHNICAL CONCEPT
The aim of the Pilot Test is to solve the following problems at a semi-industrial scale:

•  to check recovery efficiency of the proposed gravity separation of 1 - 3 mj of polluted material;

•  to check the influence of possible accompanying pollutants (chlorinated hydrocarbons, heavy metals,
   chlorides, etc.);

•  to check possible adsorption of Hg on clay minerals and its influence on decontamination efficiency;
                                             15

-------
   NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)
                                                       September 1999
   •   to test the de-watering of treated material;

   •   to specify the energy consumption and total costs of decontamination;

   •   to design the optimal decontamination unit that could be maintained and operated effectively under the
      conditions of the local economy and infrastructure; and

   •   to verify the possibility to utilize the decontaminated material - for example in brickworks.

   The proposed decontamination method consists of three main steps: blunging, gravity separation and
   de-watering as shown in the following scheme. Scheme of proposed decontamination unit:

   Processing step 1
       feed
         i.   .
 primary grinding or hydrornonitoring
              processing step  1
             washffiiH
                                                     Knelson
                                      hydro cyclone
      spiral classifier
 screen
classifier
r
                                                   Hg
                                 Hg
processing step 2     Hg
            Hg
                                                                        |flocculation


sedimentation
basin


                   | press-filter  |

                processing step 3
   Blunging - is a very important operation in the decontamination process - the stage and speed of blunging will
   have a crucial influence on the success and economy of the process. It is possible that primary raw grinding
   will be necessary. Roll-breaker or  similar equipment can be used. The breaker can be  replaced by a
   hydromonitor with an advantage of drying elimination.

   Processing step 2

   As the  scheme shows, separation of Hg is assumed in several points of decontamination  unit.  The first
   separation of mercury will be in  a washmill where Hg will be concentrated in coarse fraction. The spiral and
   screen classifiers should separate the prevailing portion of mercury into coarser fractions - gravel and sand.
   The clayey  suspension will be  treated in hydrocyclones and centrifugal separator (Knelson) where  the
   remaining portion of mercury adsorbed on clay should be separated.
                                                16

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)              September 1999


Processing step 3

The final step is thickening and de-watering of treated clay. The laboratory tests show that optimal flocculation
can be reached by addition of lime water. The flocculant will be dosed continuously and the suspension will
be thickened  in a sedimentation basin. The thickened suspension will be de-watered in a press-filter. The
sedimentation basin overflow water will be recycled in a treatment station. The decontaminated clayey material
can be used as backfill, in brickworks, or disposed of on a dump depending on the concentration of pollutants.

Consumption of energy, water, and additional agents will be measured during the Pilot Test as well as other
costs - employees, exploitation, processing equipment, waste disposal taxes, etc. The by-products, which may
have a positive influence on the economy of decontamination process (Hg, gravel, and clay), will be registered.
All the costs connected with the Pilot Test will be recalculated on feed unit.

4. ANALYTICAL APPROACH

Before starting the test the excavated material will be sampled for granularity analyses and RTG analysis to
determine the interconnection between mercury and clay particles. During the  Pilot Test the feed will be
periodically sampled for analyses of Hg or appropriate accompanying pollutants. All the inputs and outputs
of individual  processing steps will be sampled for Hg analyses both in technological water and separated
material.

5. RESULTS

For the time  being, only the results  of laboratory testing (Phase 1) are available. The laboratory tests
demonstrated that the gravity concentration method is suitable for decontamination of Hg polluted soils - in
laboratory scale was the concentration 1,150 ppm of Hg (present in visible drops) in polluted reduced to 49
ppm in treated soil.

6. HEALTH AND SAFETY

During excavation, the release of volatile Hg vapors can be high, the workers involved in this operation will
be at risk from mercury emissions. Workers will need to be provided where necessary with suitable protective
clothing and breaming equipment to protect them from such exposures.

The proposed decontamination method is wet so it is not assumed release of mercury during processing but
due to ensuring health protection the workers should use personal protection.

The atmospheric concentrations of Hg vapors would be monitored to ensure the workers" safety during the
entire decontamination process.

7. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS

The test will be carried out in the contaminated industrial area of Spolchemie plant. The aim of the proposed
work is to improve the current environmental  status. The water from processing will be treated in a water
treatment station. Other material - i.e. concentrates enriched with separated mercury and treated soil will be
used in further tests - recovery of mercury and for verifying the possibility to  utilize the decontaminated
material (for example in brickworks). All the hazardous remnants will be disposed in accordance with Czech
law.
                                              17

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)              September 1999

8. COSTS

The total assumed project cost is 17,250 USD, of which 3,000 USD (i.e. approximately 17%) was spent on
a Laboratory Test (Phase 1). The anticipated cost of the Pilot Test (Phase 2) is 14,250 USD and its structure
is as follows:

•   Personnel costs            21%
•   Excavation and transport    4%
•   Operation                 23%
•   Sampling and laboratory    33%
•   Evaluation                19%

9. CONCLUSIONS

Laboratory tests verified that the gravity concentration method is useful in processing mercury-polluted soil.

The proposed decontamination method, based on the performed laboratory tests, is assumed to be an alternative
to expensive thermal decontamination method.

10. REFERENCES

1.  Sedla* ek M. - Final report on detail hydrogeologic investigation of mercury pollution in chlor-alkali plant
    Spolchemie a.s. Usti nad Labem, KAP Ltd., Prague, 1998.

2.  Sedla* ek M. - Project on research on decontamination of mercury polluted soils, KAP Ltd., Prague, 1998.

3.  Sedla* ek M. - Report on Laboratory Testing of Mercury Polluted Soil, KAP Ltd., Prague, 1999.

4.  Tichy R. - Mercury in the soil, principles of behavior and decontamination possibilities, literature search,
    1997

5.  Computer databases - HAZARDTEXT®, RTECS®, HSDB, NJHSFS, CHRIS, IRIS, OHM/TADS
                                            18

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)
September 1999
Project No. 3
Permeable Treatment Beds
Technical Contact:
Eberhard Beitinger
WCI Umwelttechnik GmbH
Sophie-Charlotten-StraBe 33
14059 Berlin
Tel: +49-7(0)30-32609481
Fax: +49-(0)30-32609472
E-mail: exbeitiO@wcc.com
Media:
Groundwater
Costs Documented?
No, cost estimation available
Location:
Former solvent blending plant,
Essen, Germany
Technology Type:
Permeable Reactive Barrier as in-
situ groundwater remediation
technology
Contaminants:
Chlorinated and nonchlorinated
solvents, BTEX-aromates, TCE,
PCE
Project Status:
Interim Report,
Field Tests finalized
Project Dates:
Accepted 1997
Project Size:
Full Scale
Results available?
No, field test results available
1. INTRODUCTION

A pilot groundwater treatment plant was installed at a former industrial site in Essen, Germany, where organic
solvents had been stored and processed in a small chemical plant for several decades. Leakage and handling
losses caused significant soil and groundwater contamination, mainly by BTEX and CHC. The contaminated
aquifer has low hydraulic conductivity and is only 2-3 m thick. The aquifer is covered by 4-11 m of thick, silty
and clayey covering layers (loess). During investigations and conceptual remediation design, it was determined
that the site was suitable to install adsorbent walls since conventional remediation and contamination control
measures cannot be applied in a cost-efficient manner.

Subsequently, WCI and IWS studied and reported  on various technical variants to  install an adsorbent wall
in a feasibility study. The study also  established which data was necessary to arrive at the dimensions of the
adsorbent wall. The feasibility study recommended that pilot tests be conducted on the site for this purpose.
The  objective of the pilot tests was  to obtain precise  information on  the adsorption potential for the
contaminants at the site, the type and quantity of the required adsorbent material, the functioning of filters at
different flow speeds, and the long-term effectiveness as  well as the attendant risks,  if any, of installing an
adsorbent wall.
Conducting the pilot tests involved the following principal tasks:

•   Selecting a suitable adsorbent for the tests depending on  water quality and the relevant contaminant
    concentrations at the site;

•   Structural design and planning of the pilot plant;

•   Operating and taking samples from the pilot plant as well as carrying out laboratory analyses;

•   Assessment of the pilot tests.

2. BACKGROUND/SITE DESCRIPTION

From 1952 to 1985 a chemical factory was situated on an area of about 10,000 m2 located in a city in the Ruhr
area. Mostly solvents like hydrocarbons, volatile chlorinated hydrocarbons, PAHs, petroleum, turpentine oil
                                              19

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)              September 1999

substitute, ketones, monoethyleneglycol and alcohols were handled stored and processed. Today a residential
building is left on the site while underground and above ground tanks are demolished.

The ground was filled up 2,0 m over silty soil (approx. 4 to 11 m thick). Below the silt a layer of sand and
gravel (0.8 to 7.4 m) and marly sands (7.0 to 16.3 m below the top) have been detected. The marly sands are
the first waterproof layer.

The first aquifer is about 1.0 to 3.2 m thick and the flow velocity is very slow (kf = 6.6 • 10"6 m/s).
The concentrations of main contaminants in groundwater are petrol hydrocarbons 23.6 mg/1 to 164.0 mg/1,
volatile chlorinated hydrocarbons  27.0 mg/1 and aromatic hydrocarbons 153.0 mg/1. Furthermore  higher
concentrations of manganese and iron are present.

The project  is funded by the city of Essen and the state; Nordrhein-Westfalen, the former owner, went
bankrupt.

3. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROCESS

The pilot plant was fed with groundwater, which was pumped directly from the aquifer into the front column.
Two dosing pumps located behind a gravel bed in the front column fed groundwater into columns 1 and 2. The
gravel filter served to hold back sediments as well as to eliminate iron and manganese.

•   Column 1 contained:
           45 cm gravel filter (size: 2 to 3.15 mm)
           5 cm activated carbon ROW 0.08 supra
           5 cm gravel filter (gravel size: 2 to 3.15 mm)
           65 cm activated carbon ROW 0.08 supra
    The thickness of the activated carbon bed in Column  1 corresponded to the recommended thickness of the
    activated carbon bed of the adsorbent wall in the feasibility study.

•   Column 2 contained:
           100 cm activated carbon ROW 0.08 supra
    The treated water was led via an overflow into a trough located outside the container.
Groundwater analyses were  based on the  contamination at the site; their scope was determined by the
feasibility study to install an adsorbent wall. The analyses covered field parameters, general parameters and
parameters to quantify BTEX and volatile CHC contamination.

The analyzed general parameters included  sum parameters for organic compounds as well as the parameters
iron and manganese. A sum parameter for organic compounds was used in order to study  whether it could
serve as a substitute for analyses of individual substances.  Moreover, the sum parameters were also used to
check whether the results of individual analyses were plausible, ton and manganese contents  were determined
in order to check whether precipitation of these substances would block the adsorbent wall.

Separate analyses were carried out for BTEX and volatile CHC. The number of analyzed parameters (16) was
deliberately large so as to also cover important decomposition products such as vinyl chloride. Contaminant
retention  by the activated carbon was determined in  two ways. Firstly, contaminant concentrations were
continuously monitored at the inlet, in the columns  and  at the column  outlets.  Secondly,  following the
conclusion of tests, the columns were disassembled and individual partitions of carbon samples were analyzed
for contaminant content. Tests were carried out to determine whether iron and manganese precipitation or
microbial  activity in the activated carbon could block the adsorbent wall.

Water samples collected on 11 days were tested for numerous parameters; on the whole, over 1,600 individual
results  were obtained for water samples taken during pilot operation.The determined  concentrations for
                                             20

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)              September 1999

dissolved organic carbons (DOC) ranged between 80 and 160 mg/1 at the inlet The DOC values correlate well
with the CSB and TOC concentrations. No contaminant breakthrough was detected in samples from the outlets
of the two columns over a period of almost half a year.

The pilot tests with Columns 1 and 2 confirm that putting up an adsorbent wall is feasible.
With respect to contaminant retention, results of the pilot tests indicate mat the long-term effectiveness would
be much higher than the estimated period of 30 years in the feasibility study.

4. RESULTS AND EVALUATION

The pilot tests confirm the findings of the feasibility study, to the effect mat the site is suited to put up an
adsorbent wall. The following statements can be made with respect to the present tests:
•   The pilot tests show good contaminant retention in the activated carbon, in fact much higher than what
    was assessed in the feasibility study. Contaminant breakthrough for toluene and trichloroethylene was
    determined at sampling point S2P50 (i.e. after flow through 50 cm),  Column 2, only at the end of the 5-
    month pilot test operation. By  this time, throughput had reached 600 times the bed volume.
•   The pilot tests indicate that the durability of the wall given a 70 cm-thick activated carbon layer would
    be much higher than the 30 years estimated in the  feasibility study. The thickness of the carbon layer
    should therefore be reduced when the wall is put up.
•   The DOC  concentrations established during the pilot tests can almost entirely be  traced to the
    contaminants detected at the site. It is therefore to be  expected mat the adsorbing potential of the activated
    carbon will not be impaired by natural organic compounds, such as humin.
•   Data pertaining to the contaminant breakthrough suggest that the depletion of the adsorbing capacity of
    the activated carbon is accompanied by a sharp peak in the concentration of volatile substances. A suitable
    monitoring system  should therefore be set up when the adsorbent wall is erected.
•   The fact that the activated carbon could be regenerated after disassembling the plant suggests economic
    operation of the adsorbent wall.
•   Laboratory analyses of the water and activated carbon  samples indicate that iron and manganese
    precipitation will be insignificant and will not block the adsorbent wall.
•   Microbial activity could not be detected in the gravel filter or in the activated carbon; it may be concluded
    that under the given site conditions, the build-up of bacterial film does not pose a risk.
•   Preliminary laboratory tests to detennine the choice of activated carbon as well as pilot tests must be
    carried out in  all cases prior to setting up an adsorbent wall given the variance in site conditions.

5. COSTS

The costs for conducting the field tests have been EURO 50.000,--. The overall costs to erect the wall system
and the fill it with activated carbon is estimated to be EURO 750.000,--. Included are additional costs for
monitoring the water quality for 30 years, which is a long as the minimum performance time of one single
filling will be.

In comparison with traditional pump-and-treat groundwater remediation costs, the proposed permeable reactive
barrier system will be at least 25% less expensive.

6. REFERENCES

1.    Eberhard Beitinger, and Eckart  Biitow. Machbarkeitsstudie zitm Einsatz einer Adsorbenvand -
       "Schonebecker Schlucht" in Essen, Internal Report. WCI, Wennigsen. 1997 (not published)

2.    Eberhard Beitinger, and Eckard Biitow. Abschlussbericht zur Durchfiilmmg von Pilotversiichen fur erne
      geplante Adsorberwand - "Schonebecker Schlucht" in Essen, Internal Report, WCI. Wennigsen. 1998
      (not published)
                                              21

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)
September 1999
Project No. 4
Rehabilitation of Land Contaminated by Heavy Metals
Location
Lavrion, Kassandra (Greece)
Sardinia (Italy)
Estarreja (Portugal)
Burgas (Bulgaria)
Baia, Navodari, (Romania)
Technical Contact
Antliimos Xenidis
National Technical University
Athens
52 Themidos Street
15 124 Athens
Greece
tel: +30/1-772-2043
fax: +30/1-772-2168
Project Status
1st Progress Report
Project Dates
Accepted 1998
Final Report 2002
Costs Documented?
Alkaline additives:
YES
Soil leaching,
chemical fixation-
stabilization: NO
Media
Mining Tailings, Soil
Technology Type
Alkaline additives
soil leaching
chemical fixation-
immobilization
Contaminants
Lead, zinc, cadmium, arsenic, acidity, sulfates
Project Size
Laboratory,
Demonstration-scale,
Full-scale
Results Available?
Yes
Please note that this project summon' was not updated since the 1998 Annual Report. An update will be
included in the 2000 Annual Report.

1. INTRODUCTION

The Project objectives are  to develop innovative and cost-effective technologies for the environmental
rehabilitation in polymetallic sulfide mining and processing operations. These industrial activities often result
in the generation of millions of tones of wastes and tailings that are characterized as toxic and hazardous.
Improper environmental management practiced in the past, and, to a lesser degree in current operations as well,
has resulted in extensive, in spatial terms, and intensive, in terms of concentrations, contamination of land and
groundwater. Almost all of polymetallic sulfide mines in Europe are now redundant; however the mining
works and tailings remain active pollution sources for decades or even centuries after mine closure. The Project
aims at developing an integrated management scheme involving neutralizing the active sources of pollution
and cleaning-up or stabilization of the contaminated land and groundwater.

Technologies under development include:

  •      Control of acid generation and migration from sulfidic tailings by preventive,  containment and
        remedial technologies
  •      Rehabilitation of land contaminated by heavy metals by chemical immobilization techniques
  •      Rehabilitation of land contaminated by heavy metals by integrated leaching techniques

The Project is funded by the European  Commission (LIFE, BRTTE-EURAM,  ENVIRONMENT AND
CLIMATE and INCO-COPERNICUS Programmes), by a number of Industries and one Consulting firm.  Total
cost for research and development is  3,000,000 ECU over the period  1993-2001.

The status of the technologies is bench and demonstration-scale. One particular technology has been applied
in full-scale (Rehabilitation of a 150,000 t/2,500 ha sulfidic tailings dam in Lavrion, using  ground limestone
as an inhibitor for the acid-generating reactions).
                                             22

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)              September 1999

2. SITES

The project aims at developing technologies of a generic nature applicable to all polymetallic sulfide mining
operations. The following sites are being included as case studies:

  •      Lavrion mines, Greece.  Redundant galena-sphalerite-pyrite mines. Extensive sulfidic and oxidic
        tailings act as active pollution sources. The land has been heavily contaminated by heavy metals over
        an area of 3x6 km.
  •      Kassandra mines, Greece. Active galena-sphalerite-auriferous pyrite mines. Interest is focused on the
        rehabilitation of the acid-generating waste rock dumps.
  •      Monteponi and Montevecchio mines, Sardinia, Italy. Redundant lead-zinc pyrite mines. Extensive
        flotation tailings dams and calamina leach residues (calamina red muds) constitute active sources of
        pollution mat result in contamination of the surrounding land. Interest is focused on rehabilitation of
        the tailings dams and of the contaminated soils.
  •      Estarreja industrial site, Portugal. Extensive pyrite cinders from a sulfuric acid plant. Interest is on
        inhibiting the mobilization of heavy metals from  the cinders.
  •      Burgas copper mines, Burgas, Bulgaria and Baia copper flotation plant,  Romania.. Interest is focused
        on the rehabilitation of the extensive tailings dam  mat contains toxic and radioactive tailings. Also on
        the use of engineered wetlands as a passive treatment scheme for contaminated waters from the Burgas
        mine
  •      Navodari,  Romania. An industrial plant producing sulfuric acid and superphosphates has generated
        extensive pyrite cinders and phosphogypsum tailings. A methodology for environmental rehabilitation
        is under development.

3. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROCESSES

Three processes are under development. The first aims  at inhibiting acid generation and contaminant
mobilization from sulfide tailings as a preventive measure against further pollution. The second is a remedial
process for cleaning-up of contaminated land by removing the heavy metals using leaching techniques. The
third is again a remedial process aiming at the in situ chemical immobilization of the heavy metals.

3.1      Inhibition of the acid generation from  sulfidic tailings.

Acid generation from sulfidic tailings may be inhibited (a) by excluding contact of the tailings with either
oxygen or water or both and (b) by inhibiting the  acid-generating reactions:

(a)      Exclusion of contact with oxygen. The method adopted is the application of a composite dry cover mat
        includes a clay layer maintained in saturated condition at all times. Saturation inhibits diffusion of
        oxygen from the atmosphere to the tails and the clay layer acts as an effective oxygen transport barrier.
        The technique has been widely practiced in wet climates. Aim of this project is to develop a composite
        cover configuration mat will  maintain  saturation in arid  Mediterranean climates. Demo-scale
        application is under way.

(b)      Inhibition  of the acid-generation reactions. This  is practiced by the addition of ground limestone to
        the acid-generating tailings so that the acid-generation reactions are impeded. Limestone additions at
        a rate stoichiometrically equivalent to the acid-generation capacity of the tails will effectively hinder
        acid generation. Aim of this project is to investigate the possibility of forming a hard pan within the
        tails by adding only 10-20%  of the stoichiometrically required limestone. Other alkaline additives,
        such as fly ash, will also be  tested. Bench- and  demo-scale tests are being carried out. Full-scale
        rehabilitation of a flotation tailings dam in Lavrion (-2,500 ha, -150,0001 of tails) has been done with
        limestone additions equal to the stoichiometric requirement.
                                              23

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)              September 1999

3.2 Leaching methods for the clean-up of contaminated land

Integrated treatment flow-sheets are being developed on a bench-scale; pilot-plant applications will follow.
They include the following unit operations: (a) Soil leaching, using acidic chloride solutions (HCl+CaCl2) or
organic complexing agents (citric acid. Na-EDTA. Ca-EDTA), (b) metals removal and recovery from the leach
liquors in the form of a low-volume residue appropriate for controlled disposal or recycling, © regeneration
and recycling of the leach solution, (d) final polishing of liquid effluents in order to become compatible with
disposal regulations.

3.3 Chemical fixation-immobilization methods for the rehabilitation of contaminated land

Chemical stabilization of the heavy metals in situ in soils involves admixing with stabilizing agents mat will
transform the existing metal species to others of lower solubility-bioavailability and mobility. The process is
under development in bench- and demonstration-scale experiments. A number of inorganic and organic wastes
or low-cost materials are being tested as stabilizing agents, including: phosphates, fly ash, bentonite, cement
kiln dust, biological sludge, compost, saw dust. The efficiency of stabilization during bench-scale experiments
is examined by chemical extraction tests as well as by in vivo tests involving plant growth using Phaseohts
vulgaris starazagorski as plant indicators. Demonstration-scale applications involve in situ rehabilitation of
soil and development of an aesthetic vegetative cover by planting a mixture of 15 seeds.

4.  RESULTS AND COSTS

4.1    Inhibition of acid generation from sulfide tailings

Full-scale rehabilitation of the flotation tailings dam in Lavrion proved to be quite successful; after two years,
pore water improved from the initial value of pH 2.2 to pH 6.5 and is slowly rising. The cost of the application
was (1996 prices) US$290,000 for an area of 2,500 ha or US$11.5 per m2.

The other processes are still under development.

4.2    Leaching methods for the clean-up of contaminated land

Leaching is being applied to a highly contaminated soil from Lavrion with composition Pb 3.48%, Zn 2.02%,
Cd 100 mg/kg, AS 2800 mg/kg, Ca 7.28%. Leaching with CaCl2-HCl resulted in the removal of >90% of Pb,
Zn and Cd. Citric acid and EDTA removed between 60-90% of the heavy metals. Reagent consumption was
high because of the dissolution of calcium carbonate from the  soil. Leaching with Ca-EDTA seems to
overcome mis problem. Removal of the heavy metals from the leach liquors is being studied with hydroxide
and/or sulfide precipitation and reagent regeneration by resin treatment.

4.3    Chemical fixation methods for the rehabilitation of contaminated land.

Bench-scale stabilization experiments revealed that both the EPA-TCLP toxicity and the bioavailable fraction
of Pb, Zn and Cd in soils can be drastically reduced by additions of fly ash, biological sludge and phosphates
as stabilizing agents. However, in vivo experiments with indicator plants did not reveal any change in the metal
uptake pattern of the plants from the stabilized soils. Phytomass production increased with  the biological
sludge additions, but decreased with fly ash and phosphate additions. The results are being evaluated in demo-
scale applications in the "Neraki" site, Lavrion

5.      COSTS

Not available.
                                             24

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)              September 1999

6.     REFERENCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY

A. Kontopoulos: Acid mine drainage control. In: S.H. Castro, F. Vegara and M.A. Sanchez, eds, Effluent
       treatment in the mining industry. University of Conception-Chile 1997, pp. 1-40.
A. Kontopoulos, K. Komnitsas, A. Xenidis, N. Papassiopi: Environmental characterisation of the sulphidic
       tailings in Lavrion. Minerals Engineering, vol. 8, 1995, pp. 1209-1219
K. Adam, A. Kourtis, B. Gazea, A. Kontopoulos: "Evaluation of static tests used to predict the potential for
       acid drainage generation at sulphide mines." Trans. Inst. Mining and Metallurgy. Section A, vol. 106
       (1997),pp.Al-A8.
A.L. Page, R.H. Miller, D.R. Keeney: Methods of soil analysis, part 2. AGRONOMY Series No 9, part 2. Am.
       Soc. of Agronomy, Soil Sci. of America, Madison, Wisconsin, USA 1982.
A. Kontopoulos, K. Komnitsas, A.  Xenidis: Pollution,  risk assessment and rehabilitation at the Lavrion
       Technological and Cultural Park, Greece. To be presented, SWEMP 97 Conference, Ankara 1998.
E. Mylona, K. Adam, A. Kontopoulos: "Mechanisms involved in the control of acid generation from sulphide
       wastes with  limestone  addition," International Conference. Protection and Restoration of the
       Environment, Chania, Greece, 1996, pp 474-483.
A. Kontopoulos, K. Komnitsas, A. Xenidis, E. Mylona, K. Adam: "Rehabilitation of the flotation tailings dam
       in Lavrion. Part I: Environmental characterisation and development studies Clean Technologies for
       the Mining Industry, M. A. Sanchez, F. Vegarra, S.H. Castro, ed., University of Concepcion, Chile
       1995. pp. 377-390.
A. Kontopoulos, K. Komnitsas, A. Xenidis: "Rehabilitation of the flotation tailings dam in Lavrion. Part II:
       Field application", Clean Technologies for the Mining Industry. M. A.  Sanchez, F. Vegarra, S.H.
       Castro, ed., University1 of Concepcion, Chile 1995. pp. 391-400.
A. Kontopoulos, K. Komnitsas,  A.  Xenidis: "Environmental characterisation of the lead smelter slags in
       Lavrion." Minerals, Metals and the Environment II Conference, IMM, London. 1996, pp 405-419.
J.R. Conner: Chemical fixation and. solidification of hazardous wastes. N. York: Van Nostrand Reinhold,
       1990.
P.B. Trost: Soil washing. In D.E. Daniel (ed) Geotechnicalpractice for waste disposal: 585-603.  Chapman
       and Hall, London 1990.
W.E. Fristad, K.E. Weerts: Leaching adapted for metals in soil. Environmental Protection. May 1993: 35-36.
A. Kontopoulos, P. Theodoratos: Rehabilitation of heavy metal contaminated land by stabilization methods.
       In: M.A. Sanchez, F. Vegara and S.H. Castro,  eds: Environment and innovation in mining and
       mineral technology. Univ. of Conception-Chile,  1998.
A. Kontopoulos, A. Xenidis. K. Komnitsas. N. Papassiopi: "Environmental characterisation and monitoring
       of the wastes in  Lavrion," in: Environmental Issues and Waste Management in Energy and Minerals
       Production, R Ciccu, ed., Cagliari 1996, Vol. 1, pp. 209-216.
A. Kontopoulos, A. Xenidis. K. Komnitsas. N. Papassiopi: "Environmental implications of the mining
       activities in Lavrion." in P.G. Marines et al., edrs: Engineering Geology! and the Environment, Athens,
       1997, vol. 3, pp 2575-80.
C. Skoufadis, N. Papassiopi, A. Kontopoulos: "Removal of heavy metals from soils by organic acids," in P.G.
       Marines et al., edrs: Engineering Geology and the Environment. Athens. 1997, vol. 2. pp 2173-78.
N. Papassiopi, S. Tampouris, C. Skoufadis, and A. Kontopoulos: Integrated leaching processes for the removal
       of heavy metals  from heavily contaminated soils. To be presented, Contaminated Soil 1998, Edinburg
       1998
N. Papassiopi, S. Tambouris, A. Kontopoulos: Removal of heavy metals from calcareous contaminated soils
       by EDTA leaching. Accepted for publication, Water, Air and Soil Pollution.
N. Papassiopi, P. Theodoratos, T. Georgoudis. A. Kontopoulos: Selective removal of lead from calcareous
       polluted soil using the Ca-EDTA Salt.  Submitted, Water, Air and Soil Pollution.
E.G. Roche, J. Doyle & C.J. Haig: Decontamination of site of a secondary zinc smelter in Torrance California.
       \i\Hydrometallurgy 94 pp. 1035-1048. IMM, Chapman & Hali, London 1994
B. Gazea, K. Adam, A.  Kontopoulos: A review of passive systems for the treatment of acid mine drainage.
       Minerals Engineering, vol. 9, 1996, pp.23-42.
                                            25

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)              September 1999

B. Gazea, K. Adam, A. Kourtis, A. Kontopoulos: "Anoxic limestone drains for the treatment of acid mine
       drainage." in: Environmental Issues and Waste Management in Energy and Minerals Production. R.
       Ciccu, ed., Cagliari 1996, Vol. 2. pp. 729-737.
C. Due, K. Adam,  A. Kontopoulos: Mechanisms of metal removal in anaerobic passive systems.  To be
       presented, SWEMP "97 Conference, Ankara 1998
A. Kontopoulos: Biorehabilitation of the acid mine drainage phenomenon by accelerated bioleaching. In.
       Recycling technologies, treatment of waste and contaminated sites, J. Barton et al., edrs, EC, DGXII
       and Austrian Research Centre Seibensdorf, 1996, pp. 463-474.
                                            26

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)
                                                 September 1999
Project No. 5
                               Application of Biowalls/Bioscreens
Location
Refinery, dry cleander. chemical
plant	
Project Status
Intermediate report
          Media
          Groundwater
                  Technology Type
                  Biowalls/Bioscreens/
                  treatment zones
Technical Contact
Huub Rijnaarts/Sjef Stops
TNO Institute of Environmental
Sciences. Energy Research and
Process Innovation
Laan van Westenenk 501
7334DTApeldoorn
The Netherlands
Tel:+31 555493380
Fax:+31 555493410
E-mail:
H.H.M.Rijnaarts@mep.tno.nl
S. Staps@mep .tno.nl	
Project Dates
Accepted
Final Report
    1998
end 1999
Contaminants
Oil BTEX, Chlorinated solvents,
Chlorinated pesticides and benzenes
Costs Documented?
Yes
          Project Size
          pilot to full scale
                  Results Available
                  End 1999
1. INTRODUCTION

Name of the technology: Biowalls/Bioscreens/Biobarrier/Treatment zones

Status of the technology: bench, pilot to full scale; emerging and innovative

Project objectives: To develop and demonstrate the technical  and economical feasibility of various
biowall/bioscreen configurations for interception of mobile groundwater contaminants, as a more cost-effective
and groundwater resources saving alternative for currently used pump-and-treat approaches.


2. SITE DESCRIPTIONS


Chlorinated solvent  site.  The  Rademarkt  Site (Groningen, The Netherlands) is  contaminated  with
perchloroethylene (PCE) and trichlorethylene (TCE). It concerns an unconfined aquifer with a clay aquitard
at a depth of 9 m. The plume is located at a depth of 6 - 9 m and 150 m long and 30 to 60 m wide, and has
mixed redox conditions, i.e. separate reducing and oxidising zones. Transformation rates of especially
vinylchloride as observed in the field (and in the laboratory) are too slow to prevent migration of this hazardous
compound to areas to be protected. Source remediation and plume interception are therefore required.

Oil refinery site. At mis site in the Rotterdam Harbour area, it is required to manage a plume of the dissolved
fraction of a mineral oil/gasoline contamination (80% of the compounds belong to the C6 - C12 fraction).

Aromatic hydrocarbon (BTEX) sites. At three sites in the north part of the Netherlands, deep anaerobic
aquifers contaminated with Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene or Xylenes  (BTEX) have been investigated.
Under the existing sulfate-reducing conditions, the intrinsic biodegradation of toluene and ethylbenzene could
be demonstrated in the field and in microcosm studies. Benzene was shown to be persistent. Managing the
benzene plumes, i.e. by enhanced in-situ bioprocesses, is therefore required.

Chlorinated pesticides site. Hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH) isomers are important pollutants introduced by
the production of lindane (gamma HCH). Natural degradation of all HCH-isomers  was demonstrated at the
                                             27

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)              September 1999

site of investigation. Interception of the HCH/Chlorobenzene/benzene plume is needed to protect a canal
located at the boundary of the site.

3. DESCRIPTION OF PROCESS

Chlorinated solvent site. Laboratory experiments identified that a mixture of electron-donors is most suitable
to enhance the in situ reductive dechlorination.  In situ full-scale demonstration of enhanced anaerobic
degradation in the source zone designed for complete reductive dechlorination is currently performed. The
same technology is considered to be applied later at the head of the plume in terms of a treatment zone.

Oil refinery  site. Bench scale experiments have been finished and established i) optimal  grain-size and
packing density for the porous media used in the trench, ii) optimal oxygen supply rates to sufficiently initiate
aliphatic hydrocarbon biodegradation and to minimise clogging with  iron (III) oxides. Three different
technologies are being tested at pilot scale: two gravel filled reactive trenches with biosparging units and one
biosparging fence, without excavation of the soil. Each pilot application has a length of 40 m, and a depth of
4 meters.

Aromatic  hydrocarbon (BTEX) sites.  Microcoms were  used to  investigate  possibilities to  stimulate
biodegradation of benzene and TEX compounds. Especially, addition of nitrate and low amounts of oxygen
to the anaerobic systems appears to be the appropriate way to create down-stream biostimulated zones. Pilot
demonstration tests are currently performed. One pilot test is a biostimulated zone with dimensions of 10 to
10 meters.

Chlorinated pesticide site. A bioactivated zone as an alternative to conventional large-scale pump-and-treat
is currently being investigated. Laboratory process research indicated  that a combination of anaerobic-
microaerophilic in-situ stimulation in a bioactivated zone is the most feasible approach. Preparations are being
made to incorporate the installation of the biotreatment zone in new building activities ate the site.

4. RESULTS AND EVALUATION

The status of most projects is that they recently have entered a pilot or a full-scale phase. First evaluations of
technology performance are to be expected at the end of 1999.

5. COSTS
hi a separate cost-analyses project, the costs of investment and operation of various bioscreen configurations
(i.e. the funnel-and-gate™, the reactive trench and the biostimulated zone configuration) is being evaluated
for various sites. The results indicate mat biotreatment zones are in most cases the cheapest and most flexible
approach, whereas  funnel-and-gate™'1 systems and reactive trenches have a cost  level comparable  to
conventional pump-and-treat.  Biotreatment zones have therefore  the greatest market perspective, whereas
funnel-and-gate11"1 systems and reactive trenches can be used when a high degree of protection is required or
when these approaches can be integrated with other building activities planned at the site.

6. REFERENCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY

Bosnia, T. N. P., Van Aalst, M.A., Rijnaarts, H.H.M., Taat, J., & Bovendeur, J. (1997) Intrinsic dechlorination
      of 1,2-dichloroethane at an industrial site monitoring of extensive in-situ biotechnological remediation.
      In: In Situ and On Site  Bioremediation, the 4th International Symposium, New Orleans, Louisiana,
      April 28-Mayl.

Brunia, A., Van Aalst-van Leeuwen, M.A., Bosnia. T.N.P., & Rijnaarts, H.H.M. (1997) Feasibility study on
      the in situ bioremediation of chlorinated solvents using in situ electrochemical generation of hydrogen
       (hi Dutch) Internal TNO-report.
                                              28

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)              September 1999

De Kreuk, H., Bosma, T.N.P., Schraa, G., & Middeldorp, P. (1998) Complete in situ biodegradation of
      perchloroethylene  and trichloroethylene under anaerobic conditions. CUR-NOBIS,  Gouda, The
      Netherlands, Nobis report, project no 95-2-19

Gerritse, J.,  Alphenaar, A.. & Gottschal.  J.C. (1998) Ecophysiology and application of dechlorination
      anaerobes. ASCE Conference on Environmental Engineering, 6-10 June, Chicago.

Gerritse, J., Borger, A., van Heiningen, E., Rijnaarts, H.H.M., Bosma, T.N.P. 1999, in press. Presented at the
      In situ and on-site Bioremediation, the fifth international symposium, San Diego, USA, April 19-22,
      1999.

Gerritse, J., Schraa, G., &  Stains. F. (1999). Dechlorination by anaerobic microorganisms. 9th European
      Congress of Biotechnology (ECB9), July 11-15, Brussels.

Griffioen, J., Rijnaarts, H.H.M., van Heiningen, E., Hanstveit, B., & Hiddink, H. (1998) Benzene degradation
      under strongly  reducing conditions (In Dutch, with English summary) CUR-NOBIS, Gouda, The
      Netherlands. Nobis project no. 96-3-05 (in press)

Koene, J. J. A., Rijnaarts, H.H.M. 1996. In-situ activated bioscreens: a feasibility study (in Dutch, with English
      summary) R 96/072.  TNO-MEP.

Langenhoff, A. A. M.. van  Liere, H.C.. Harkes, M.H., Pijls, C.G.J.M., Schraa, G., Rijnaarts, H.H.M. 1999,
      in press. Combined Intrinsic and Stimulated In Situ Biodegradation of Hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH).
      Presented at the In situ and on-site Bioremediation, the fifth international symposium. San Diego. USA.
      April 19-22, 1999.

Nipshagen, A., Veltkamp, A. G., Beuming, G., Koster, L.W., Buijs, C.E.H.M., Griffioen, J., Kersten, R.H.B.,
      & Rijnaarts, H.H.M.  (1997). Anaerobic degradation of BTEX at the sites Slochteren and Schoonebeek
      107, (In Dutch, with English abstract). CUR-NOBIS, Gouda, The Netherlands, Nobis report project no.
      95-1-43.

Rijnaarts, H. H. M. (1997). Data requirements for in-situ remediation. NICOLE-workshop "Site assessment
      & characterisation", TNO-MEP, Apeldoorn, 22-23 January.

Rijnaarts, H. H. M. & Sinke, A. (1997). Development and acceptance of guidelines for safe application of
      natural attenuation. NICOLE-workshop, Compiegne/France, 17-18 April.

Rijnaarts, H.  H. M.,  Brunia. A.,  & Van Aalst, M.A. (1997). In-situ bioscreens. In: In situ and on-site
      bioremediation, the 4th International Symposium, New Orleans, Louisiana, April 28 - May 1.

Rijnaarts, H. H. M., De Best, J.H., Van Liere, H.C., & Bosma,  T.N.P. (1998) Intrinsic biodegradation of
      chlorinated solvents: from thermodynamics to field. Nobis/TNO report. CUR-NOBIS, Gouda, The
      Netherlands, NOBIS project no. 96004

Rijnaarts, H. H. M., Van Aalst-van Leeuwen, M.A., Van Heiningen, E., Van Buijsen, H., Sinke, A., Van Liere,
      H.C., Harkes, M., Baartmans, R., Bosma, T.N.P.,  & Doddema,  H.J. (1998b). Intrinsic and enhanced
      bioremediation in aquifers contaminated with chlorinated and aromatic hydrocarbons in the Netherlands.
      6th International FZK/TNO Conference on Contaminated soil, Edinburgh, 17-21 May.

Rijnaarts, H.H.M.  (1998) Application of biowalls/bioscreens. NATO-CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated
      Land and Groundwater (Phase IE), annual report no. 228, EPA/542/R-98/002, p. 19 - 20.
                                            29

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)             September 1999

Rijnaarts, H.H.M.  (1998) Bioprocesses in treatment walls. NATO-CCMS Pilot Study on Contaminated Land
      and Groundwater (Phase III). Special session Treatment walls and Permeable Reactive Barriers, report
      no. 229. EPA/542/R-98/003, p. 44 - 47.

Schippers, B. P. A., Bosnia, T.N.P., Van den Berg, J.H., Te Street, C.B.M., Van Liere, H.C., Schipper, L., &
      Praamstra, T.F. (1998) Intrinsic bioremediation and bioscreens at dry cleaning sites contaminated with
      chlorinated solvents. (In Dutch, with English abstract). CUR-NOBIS, Gouda, The Netherlands, NOBIS-
      report project no. 96-2-01

Van Aalst-van Leeuwen, M. A., Brinkman, J., Keuning, S., Nipshagen, A.A.M., & Rijnaarts, H.H.M. (1997)
      Degradation of perchloroethene and trichloroethene under sequential redox conditions Phase 1, partial
      results 2-6: Field characterisation and laboratory studies. (In Dutch, with English abstract) CUR-NOBIS,
      Gouda, The Netherlands, Nobis report project no. 95-1-41

Van Eekert, M.H.A., Staps J.J.M., Monincx J.F., Rijnaarts H.H.M. (1999) Bitterfeld: Bioremediation of
      contaminated aquifers. Partial  report  1  of the TNO-NOBIS participation in the SAFIRA project,
      Bitterfeld, Germany. TNO-MEP Apeldoom, The Netherlands, Report no. TNO-MEP-R99/106, pp 43.

van Heiningen, E., Nipshagen, A.A.M., Griffioen, J., Veltkamp, A.G., Rijnaarts, H.H.M. 1999, in press.
      Intrinsic and enhanced Biodegradation of Benzene in strongly reduced aquifers. Presented at the In situ
      and on-site Bioremediation, The fifth international symposium, San Diego, april 19-22, 1999.

Van Liere, H. C., Van Aalst-van Leeuwen, M.A., Pijls, C.G.J.M., Van Eekert, M.H.A., & Rijnaarts, H.H.M.
      (1998) In situ biodegradation of hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH). 5th International HCH and Pesticides
      Forum IHOBE, 25-27 June 1998, LEIOA.

Van Liere, H. C., Van Aalst-van Leeuwen, M.A., & Rijnaarts, H.H.M. (1998b). In situ biodegradation of
      hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH). EGS meeting, 20-24 April, Nice, France.

Van Liere,  H. C, van  Buijsen H.JJ , Harkes  M.P., Dyer M., Gerritse, J. & Rijnaarts, H.H.M.  (1998c)
      Laboratory assessment of design parameters for an aerobic mineral oil degrading bioscreen- and
      consequences for field application. Part of Feasibility study into a ''Biological Fence" at a site of Shell
      Netherlands Refinery. TNO-MEP, Apeldoorn, The Netherlands, report no. TNO-MEP-R98/323.
                                            30

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)
September 1999
Project No. 6
Rehabilitation of a Site Contaminated by PAH Using Bio-Slurry Technique
Location
Former railroad unloading
area, northern Sweden
Technical Contact
Erik Backhand
Eko Tec AB
Nasuddsvagen lo
93221 Skelleftehamn
Sweden
tel: +46/910-33366
fax:+467910-33375
E-mail:
erik.backlund@ebox.tninet.se
Project Status
Interim
Project Dates
Accepted 1996
Final Report 1999
Costs Documented?
No
Media
Soil
Technology Type
Ex situ
bioremediation
Contaminants
coal tars, phenols, cyanides, metals, ammonium
compounds
Project Size
Full-scale (3,000 tons)
Results Available?
Yes
Please note that this project summary was not updated since the 1998 Annual Report. An update will be
included in the 2000 Annual Report.

1. INTRODUCTION

Eko Tec AB is a Swedish environmental engineering company dealing with problems posed by hazardous
wastes, soil, and water pollution. Main clients are the oil industry, Swedish National Oil Stockpile Agency,
and the Swedish State Railways.

In 1995, Eko Tec was contracted for bioslurry remediation  of approximately 3,000 tons of creosote-
contaminated soil and ditch sediments from a railway station area in the northern part of Sweden. A clean-up
criterion of 50 ppm total-PAH was decided by the environmental authorities. For the specific PAH compounds
benzo(a)pyrene  and benzo(a)anthracene, a cleanup criterion of 10 ppm w-as decided.

Full-scale treatment has been preceded by bench- and pilot-scale treatability studies carried out at the Eko Tec
treatment plant in  Skelleftehamn, Sweden.

2. SITE DESCRIPTION

Not available

3. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROCESSS
3.1 Pretreatment

The contaminated soil was initially treated to reduce volume. Stones and boulders were separated from the rest
of the soil. In the next step, the soil was screened in a 10 mm sieve. Soil with a grain size less than 10 mm was
mixed with water and later pumped to wet-screening equipment, in which particles >2 mm were separated
from the process. The remaining soil fraction (<2 mm) was pumped to a 60 m' slurry-phase bioreactor for
further treatment. The volume of the treated soil fraction (<10 mm) was approximately 25 mJ. Samples were
taken from the soil before water was added.

3.2 Slurry-Phase Bioreactor Treatment

Slurry-phase treatment was carried out in a 60 nr Biodyn reactor. During treatment, the soil/water mixture was
continuously kept in suspension. In order to optimize the degradation rate, an enrichment culture containing
                                             31

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)              September 1999

microorganisms that feed on PAH was added to the slurry, together with nutrients and soil activators. During
the treatment phase, dissolved  oxygen, nutrient concentration, temperature, and pH were  monitored
continuously.

After 27 days of treatment, the cleanup criteria were met and the slurry-phase treatment process was closed.
The  slurry was pumped to a concrete  basin where the treated soil was separated  from the water by
sedimentation. The waster was stored for reuse in the  text treatment batch. The treated soil will be reused as
fill material.

3.3 Monitoring Program

In order to determine the initial PAH concentration, a soil sample was taken from the soil fraction <10 mm.
During the wet screening process, a soil sample was taken from the separated soil (<2 mm fraction). Samples
were also taken from the slurry phase during treatment. Soil samples were stored by freezing, and then sent
to the laboratory. The same accredited laboratory was used during the project period.

4. RESULTS

Cleanup criteria were met in  14 days. The initial PAH concentration (total PAH) was 219.9 ppm. Final
concentration after 27 days of treatment was 26.97 ppm, which is well below the cleanup criterion of 50 ppm.
PAH compounds benzo(a)pyrene  and benzo(a)anthracene were occurring in concentrations below the cleanup
criterion of 10 ppm.

5. COSTS

Not vet available
                                             32

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)
September 1999
Project No. 7
Risk Assessment for a Diesel-Fuel Contaminated Aquifer
Based on Mass Flow Analysis During Site Remediation
Location
Menziken/Studen. Switzerland
Technical Contact
Matliias Schluep
BMG Engineering AG
Ifangstrasse 11
8057 Schlieren
Switzerland
Tel: +41/1-732-9286
Fax: +41/1-730-6622
E-mail:
mathias . schluep@bmgeng . ch
Project Status
Interim
Project Dates
Accepted 1997
Final Report 2000
Costs Documented?
No
Media
Groundwater
Contaminants
Petroleum Hydrocarbons
Oil)
Project Size
Technology Type
In situ Bioremediation
(Diesel Fuel, Heating
Results Available?
Yes
1. INTRODUCTION

The studies are aimed to give a scientific basis for an evaluation procedure, allowing to predict the treatability
of sites contaminated with petroleum hydrocarbons with in situ bioremediation technologies, such as
biorestoration and intrinsic bioremediation. This includes the description of the risk development  with time
by identifying critical mass flows. The focus of the project lies on the modeling of movement and fate of PHC
in the subsurface.

2. SITE DESCRIPTION

At theMenziken site [1] the contaminated aquifer was remediated based on the stimulation of indigenous
microbial populations by supplying oxidants and nutrients (biorestoration). Detailed investigations were made
from 1988 until 1995. The engineered in situ bioremediation took place from 1991 - 1995.

At the Studen site [2] no engineered remedial actions were taken. The investigations started in  1993 and led
to a better understanding of the biological processes occurring in the aquifer. It could be shown that intrinsic
bioremediation is a major process in the removal of PHC at this site.

3. DESCRIPTION OF THE RESEARCH ACTIVITY

Emphasis was put into the assessment of processes controlling the risk development at petroleum contaminated
sites. Laboratory studies were performed to study the dissolution of aromatic hydrocarbons from diesel fuel
into the aqueous phase and the biodegradation of the soluble fraction of diesel fuel under denitrifying and
aerobic conditions. Results of the research could be applied successfully to perform a risk assessment at the
Menziken [3] and the Studen site [4].

4. RESULTS AND EVALUATION

In laboratory systems it could be shown that Raoult's law is valid during dynamic dissolution of aromatic
compounds from complex NAPL mixtures (e.g. diesel fuel, heating oil) in non-disperse liquid/liquid systems.
This is true as long as a significant depletion of substances is observable. At low NAPL concentrations non-
equilibrium effects probably play a major role in the dissolution behavior. The quality of predictions could be
improved by considering time varying NAPL mass. Results will be published in fall '99 [5].
                                             33

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)             September 1999

In column studies the potential of PHC mineralization under denitrifying and aerobic conditions could be
evaluated for selected aromatic substances. Results are subject of further evaluations and a basis for other
studies. Publications are scheduled for early 2000.

The risk in Menziken and Studen could be assessed with two diploma thesis's [3. 4] based on the studies which
were performed in the laboratory [5] and the field [1.2]. Mass balance calculations were used to characterize
the field sites concerning the present risk, the risk development, and the site's potential to remove PHC due
to biodegradation processes. Generally it is assumed that those calculations allow to plan initial remedial action
and a long term remedial strategy at PHC contaminated sites. It is also assumed that the risk development is
predictable during site remediation within acceptable uncertainty ranges. Publications are scheduled for early
2000.

5. REFERENCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY

1.  Hunkeler D., Hoehener P.. Bernasconi S., Zeyer J. 1999. Engineered in situ bioremediation of a petroleum
    hydrocarbon contaminated aquifer: Assessment of mineralization based on alkalinity, inorganic carbon
    and stable isotope balances. J. Contain. Hydrol. in press.

2. Bolliger C., Hoehener P., Hunkeler D.,Haeberli K., Zeyer J. 1999. Intrinsic bioremediation of a petroleum
    hydrocarbon contaminated auqifer and assessment of mineralization based on stable carbon isotopes.
    Biodegradation in press.

3. Wyrsch B., Zulauf C. 1998. Risikobewertung eines mit Dieselol kontaminierten Standortes. Diplomarbeit.
    Eidgenoessische Technische Hochschule ETH, Zurich.

4. Kreikenbaum  S., Scerpella  D.   1999.  Risikobewertung  eines  Heizoelschadenfalls.  Diplomarbeit.
    Eidgenoessische Technische Hochschule ETH, Zurich.

5. Schluep M.,  Gaelli R., Schwarzenbach R.P., Zeyer J.  Dynamic equilibrium dissolution of complex non-
    aqueous phase mixtures into the aqueous phase.  In preparation
                                             34

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)
September 1999
Project No. 8
Obstruction of Expansion of a Heavy Metal/Radionuclide Plume Around a
Contaminated Site by means of Natural Barriers Composed of Sorbent Layers
Location
Istanbul University
Technical Contact
Resat Apak
Istanbul University
Avcilar Campus, Avcilar
34850 Istanbul, Turkey
tel: 90/212-591-1996
fax: 90/212-591-1997
e-mail: rapak@istanbul.edu.tr
Project Status
Interim Report
Project Dates
Accepted 1998
Interim Report 1999
Final Report 2000
Costs Documented?
No
Contaminants
Heavy metals (Pb, Cu,
Cd) and radionuclides
(137Cs, 90Sr,23SU), textile
dyes
Technology Type
In situ adsorption
and
stabilization/
solidification
Media
Soil and groundwater (Unconventional sorbents
e.g., red muds and fly ashes simulate hydrous
oxide-like soil minerals; kaolinite and feldspar
represent clay minerals)
Project Size
Bench-scale
Results Available?
Partly yes
1. INTRODUCTION

When a spill or leakage of a heavy metal/radionuclide contaminant occurs, in situ soil and groundwater
technologies are generally preferred to cope with the contaminants and to prevent their dispersion outside the
site. Barrier wall technologies employ immediate action mat restricts the expansion of the contaminant plume.
Thus, this project involves a laboratory-scale investigation of the use of metallurgical solid wastes and clay
minerals as barrier materials to adsorb toxic heavy metals and radionuclides from  water  (a fixation or
stabilization process) followed by solidification of the metal-loaded mass in a cement-based block totally
resistant to atmospheric weathering and leaching conditions.

2. BACKGROUND

Metals account for much of the contamination found at hazardous waste sites. They are present in the soil and
groundwater (at approximately 65% of U.S. Superfund sites) coming from various metal processing industrial
effluents. Turkey also has metal (Pb, Cd, Cu, Cr, U etc.) contaminated sites due to effluents predominantly
from battery,  electroplating, metal finishing and leather tanning industries, and mining operations.

Cesium-137 and strontium-90, with half-lives of 30 and 28 year, respectively, pose significant threats to the
environment  as a result of fallout mainly from power plant accidents. In Turkey, 137Cs became a matter of
public concern after the Chernobyl accident, especially contaminating the tea plant harvested in the Black Sea
Coast of the country. On the other hand, milk products and other biological materials containing Ca were
extensively investigated for possible 90Sr contamination. Land burial of low-level radioactive wastes also pose
a contamination risk to groundwater.

Physical/chemical treatment processes specific to metals/radionuclides include chemical precipitation, ion
exchange, electrokinetic technologies,  soil washing, sludge leaching,  membrane processes and common
adsorption. When adsorption is employed, there is an increasing trend toward substitution of pure adsorbents
(e.g., activated carbon, alumina and other hydrated oxides) with natural by-products, soil minerals or stabilized
solid waste materials (e.g., bauxite waste red muds  and fly ashes). These substances  also serve as barrier
material for passive wall technologies utilized around a heavy metal spill site or shallow-land burial facility
of low-level radioactive wastes. Once these contaminants are stabilized within barrier walls, it is also desirable
to fix them in an environmentally safe form by performing in situ stabilization/solidification by way of adding
cement - and pozzolans if necessary - to obtain a durable concrete mass. The host matrix for metals and
                                              35

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)              September 1999

radionuclides, i.e., red muds, fly ashes and clay minerals, may serve as inexpensive pozzolanic binders to be
used along with cement for solidification.

The  aim of this  Pilot Study project is to develop unconventional cost-effective sorbents for basically
irreversible fixation of heavy metals/radionuclides; these sorbents should show  high capacities and fast
retention  kinetics  for  the  so-called  contaminants.  The   determination  of  conditions  affecting
stabilization/solidification of the loaded sorbents by adding pozzolans and cement is also aimed. Durability
and  leachability  of the final  concrete blocks have to be  tested.  Modeling  of sorption of  heavy
metals/radionuclides onto the tested materials has to be made in order to extend the gained knowledge to
unforeseen cases. Finally a reasonable unification of in  situ physical/chemical treatment technologies
applicable to a spill/leakage site will be accomplished.

3. TECHNICAL CONCEPT

The effect of various parameters (sorbent grain size. pH. time of contact, contaminant concentration, metal
speciation etc.) affecting the adsorption/desorption behavior of the selected heavy metals onto/from the
sorbents has  been investigated.  The sorption capacity (batchwise and dynamic column  capacities)and
leachability of the sorbents  in terms of heavy metals/radionuclides have been estimated by the aid of batch
contact, column elution and standard leaching (simulating groundwater conditions) tests. Possible interferents
(e.g., inert electrolytes as neutral salts) have been incorporated in the  synthetic contaminant solutions so as to
observe any incomplete adsorption or migration of contaminants that may occur under actual field conditions.
The sorption data have been analyzed and fitted to linearized adsorption isotherms. New mathematical models
have been developed to interpret equilibrium adsorption data with simple polynomial equations.

Red muds and fly ashes, after being loaded to saturation with Pb(II), Cd(II) and Cu(II).  were solidified to
concrete blocks which should not pose a risk to the environment. The setting and hardening characteristics of
mortars as well as the flexural and mechanical strengths of the solidified  specimens were optimized with
respect to the  dosage of natural and metal-loaded solid wastes. Extended metal leaching tests were carried out
on the solidified samples.

These treatment steps  actually serve the perspective of unification of seemingly separate  physical/chemical
technologies for the removal of heavy metals/radionuclides in environmentally safe forms. The developed
barrier materials in a way resembles iron hydroxides and oxyhydroxides that are currently developed from low-
cost iron waste streams by  DuPont (Hapka. 1995).  In the meantime, although not directly fitting with the
project title, the usage of iron fillings as potential barrier material has been tested for the management of textile
dyeing wastes, e.g., as a restricting  agent for an uncontrolled expanding plume from a permeable storage
lagoon or pond where  textile wastes are collected.

4. ANALYTICAL APPROACH

The metallurgical solid wastes used as sorbents were supplied from Turkish  aluminium and thermal (coal-
fired) power plants, and characterized by both wet chemical and X-ray (diffraction and fluorescence) analysis.
They were subjected to chemical treatment (water and acid washing) for stabilization, and  classified with
respect to size when necessary. Their surface areas were determined by BET/N2 surface area analysis, and their
surface acidity constants (pKa) by potentiometric titration.

After equilibrating the sorbents with the metal solutions, all metal determinations in the centrifugates were
made with flame atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS) using a Varian SpectrAA FS-220 instrument. The beta
activities of the Cs-137 and Sr-90 radioisotope containing  centrifugates were counted by a ERD Mullard
Geiger Muller tube type MX 123  system with halogen extinction. The batch and dynamic adsorption and
desorption tests were carried out in thermostatic shakers and standard pyrex glass columns, respectively.
                                              36

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)             September 1999

A mortar-mixing mechanical apparatus, ASTM Vicat apparatus, steel specimen moulds (4x4x16 cm"),
tamping-vibrating apparatus, and testing equipment for flexural and compressive strength tests were used for
following the solidification process and the mechanical strength of the final concrete blocks.

The textile dyes used for modeling textile wastes were analyzed by UV/Visible spectrophotometry.

The adsorption isotherms conforming to Langmuir, Freundlich, B.E.T. and Frumkin isotherm equations were
evaluated by linear regression and non-linear curve fitting of experimental data.

5. RESULTS

The distribution  coefficients of metals (as Log KD) between the solid (red mud, fly ash etc.) and solution
phases varied between 1-3 and showed a gradual decrease with increasing equilibrium concentration of the
metal remaining  in solution.

The Langmuir saturation capacities of the sorbents (in the units of mg metal per g sorbent as red mud-fly ash,
in this order) for the metals averaged at approximately 50-200 mg Cd.g"1, 40-100 mg Cu.g"1, and 100-350 mg
Pb.g"1.

The adsorption isotherms were somewhat  S-shaped B.E.T. type isotherms showing layered sorption at the
natural pH of equilibration, but saturation of the sorbent was attained at a definite concentration enabling an
approximated Langmuir evaluation of equilibrium data in operational sense.

The order of hydrolysable divalent metal cation retention on the selected sorbents were as follows in terms of
molar saturation capacities: Cu > Pb > Cd for fly ashes and Cu  > Cd > Pb  for red  muds. The degree of
insolubility of the metal hydroxides approximately followed the same order. The simulation of CO2-injected
groundwater conditions were  achieved by saturated aqueous CO2 (pH 4.8) and  carbonic acid/bicarbonate
buffer (pH 7.0) solutions. The heavy metals (Cu, Pb, Cd) retained on the sorbents were not leached out by
these  carbonated leachant solutions.

Heavy metal adsorption onto red muds, either as free metal ion or in chelated metal-EDTA forms, has been
effectively modeled for (M+M-EDTA) mixtures. The adsorption data could be theoretically generated by using
simple quadratic  equations in terms of covalently- and ionically- adsorbed metal concentrations in the sorbent
phase, once the total metal concentration prior to equilibration and final solution pH were known.

As for solidification of the metal-loaded solid wastes, when these loaded wastes were added up to 20% by mass
to Portland cement-based formulations, the fixed metals did not leach out from the solidifed concrete blocks
over extended periods, with the exception of Cu(II), which reached a concentration of 0.4 ppm after 8 months
in a water leachate of pH 8-9. 2%  setting accelerator Ca3(PO4)2-added improved formulations could bear only
10%  of lead-loaded fly ash, while this tolerance could be raised to 20% fly ash by  incorporating (3%
Ca3(PO4)2+l% CaCl2) mixed additive.

The studied radionuclides did not show a significant temperature dependency in adsorption. Especially
radiostrontium retention increased with pH. These observations are in accord with ion  exchange mechanism
of sorption. Radiocesium adsorption is maximal around neutral pH which is specific for most natural waters.

Of the textile dyes tested, acid blue and acid yellow showed 75-90% and 60-80% removal, respectively, when
passed through a granular iron bed at an initial concentration of 10-100 ppm dye  containing 0.10 M HC1 in
solution.
                                             37

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)              September 1999

6. HEALTH AND SAFETY

The primary components of the unconventional sorbent suspensions, i.e.. red muds and fly ashes containing
Fe2O3, A12O3, SiO2, TiO2 and some aluminosilicates, to be used as barrier material are essentially non-toxic.
The tested heavy metals, either as free ions or in chelated forms, i.e., Cd2+, Pb2+ (and partly Cu2+) and Cd-
EDTA2", Pb-EDTA2~, Cu-EDTA2~, were toxic, so care should be exercised especially in solidification/
stabilization processes using the heavy metal-loaded sorbents in dry fonii where small particles could be
inhaled by workers. Also working with radionuclide solutions, even in very dilute forms, needs special pipettes
and glassware to be used under a hood on a stainless steel work-bench, and special laboratory practice with
workers wearing radiation dosimeters. All waste solutions even at very low-level activity should be properly
collected and submitted to the nuclear energy authority for waste storage and stabilization.

7. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS

Prior acid or water leaching of the sorbents before adsorption experiments did not effectively increase the
specific surface area or chemical adsorption power of these sorbents, but rather these sorbents were stabilized
so as not to leach out any micropollutants to water at the time of heavy metal adsorption. It is also indicated
in literature that iron oxyhydroxide based grouts as barrier material can be made from low cost industrial by-
products, which should be tested for safety and effectiveness on a case-by-case basis (Hapka et al., 1995). Thus
these criteria should be judged for red muds and fly ashes.

Stabilization/solidification of the metal-loaded solid wastes puts these wastes and incorporated toxic metals
into environmentally safe (mechanically strong, durable and imleachable) forms. The matrix disrupting effect
of Pb was eliminated by using relatively small amounts of sodium aluminate or calcium phosphate to improve
the setting, hardening and mechanical properties of the final concrete blocks. It was environmentally safe to
observe mat the matrix-held metals (either as a result of irreversible adsorption or solidification) did not leach
out by carbonate or carbonic acid solutions ensuring the chemical stability of these solid wastes under changing
groundwater conditions.

8. COSTS

Because iron-based grouts (without relatively expensive additives such as citric acid, urea and urease) can be
prepared from inexpensive by-products, the primary costs involved  come from transportation and additives
(Jet grouted, 25% grout) roughly around 50 USD per m2 for 1m thick wall, i.e., or 50 USD for 1 cubic meter.
The overall cost data have not yet been obtained.

9. CONCLUSIONS

In investigation of the possibility of usage of metallurgical solid wastes as cost-effective sorbents in heavy
metal (Pb, Cu, Cd) and radionuclide (Cs-137 and Sr-90) removal from  contaminated water, red muds and
especially fly ashes have been shown to exhibit a high capacity. Extensive modeling of heavy metal sorption
- either as free metal ions or in the form of EDTA-chelates - has been performed by simple quadratic
equations in terms of the retained metal concentration in the sorbent  phase. These modeling efforts enable to
predict heavy metal adsorption in different media over a wide pH and concentration range. The developed iron-
and aluminium- oxide based sorbents may be used as barrier material  as cost-effective grout forme prevention
of expansion of a heavy metal contaminant plume.

Heavy metal-loaded solid wastes have been effectively solidified by adding cement, sand and water.  The
setting and mechanical properties of concrete  specimens obtained by optimal dosage of waste addition were
satisfactory. The fixed heavy metals did not leach out appreciably into water over extended periods.

The usage of iron fillings as potential barrier material has been successfully tested for the management of
textile dyeing wastes, i.e., acid blue and acid yellow.

                                              38

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)              September 1999

A unified passive technological process for the in situ sorption of heavy metals, radionuclides and textile
wastes using iron oxide-, alumina- and silica- based metallurgical solid wastes functioning as barrier material
in conjunction with granular metallic iron is on the way of development. The presumed process is planned to
be finished with in situ stabilization/solidification.

10. REFERENCES

1.  S. Arayici, R. Apak and V. Apak, "Equilibrium modeling of pH in environmental treatment processes,"
    J. Environ. Sci. and Health, Pt. A-Environ. Sci. andEngg., 31 (1996) 1127-1134.

2.  R. Apak, G. Atun, K. Giiclii, E. Tutem and G. Keskin, "Sorptive removal of cesium-137 and strontium-90
    from water by unconventional sorbents. I. Usage of bauxite wastes (red muds)", J. Nucl. Sci.  Technol,
    32(1995)1008-1017.

3.  R. Apak, G. Atun, K. Guclii and E. Tutem, "Sorptive removal of cesium-137 and strontium-90 from water
    by unconventional sorbents. II. Usage of coal fly ash", J. Nucl. Sci. Technol., 33 (1996) 396-402.

4.  F. Kilinckale, S. Ayhan and R. Apak, "Solidification-stabilization of heavy metal-loaded red muds and
    fly ashes", J. Chem. Technol.  Biotechnol, 69 (1997) 240-246.

5.  R. Apak, E. Tutem, M. Hiigul  and J. Hizal, "Heavy metal cation adsorption onto unconventional sorbents
    (red muds and fly ashes)", Water Research, 32 (1998) 430-440.

6.  R. Apak, "Heavy metal and pesticide removal from contaminated groundwater by the use of metallurgical
    waste sorbents". NATO/CCMS International Meeting, 18-22 November 1991, Washington, DC, USA.

7.  R. Apak, ''Uranium(VI) adsorption by soil in relation to speciation", Mediterranean Conference on
    Environmental Geotechnology, 24-27 May 1992, Cesme, Turkey.

8.  E. Tutem and R Apak, "The role of metal-ligand complexation equilibria in the retention and mobilization
    of heavy metals in soil", Contaminated Soil '95 Proceeding of the Fifth International FZK/TNO
    Conference on Contaminated Soil, 30 Oct.-3 Nov. 1995, Maastricht, Netherlands, W. J. van den Brink,
    R. Bosnian and F. Arendt (eds.), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Vol. I, 425-426.

9.  R. Apak. "Sorption/solidification of selected heavy metals and radionuclides from water", NATO/CCMS
    Pilot Study International Meeting on 'Evaluation of Emerging and Demonstrated Technologies for the
    Treatment of Contaminated Land and Groundwater', 17-21 March 1997, Golden Colorado, USA.

10. K. Guclu, unpublished Ph.D. thesis (Supervisor: R. Apak), "Investigation and modeling of heavy metal
    adsorption  dependent upon  pH and  complexing  agents", Department  of Chemistry, Faculty of
    Engineering, Istanbul University. 1999, Istanbul.

11. A. M. Hapka, J. S. Thompson  and J. M. Whang, "Method for precipitating a solid phase of metal", 1995,
    provisional patent application.

12. R. R. Rumer and J.  K. Mitchell, "Assessment of barrier containment technologies". International
    Containment Technology! Workshop, 29-31 Aug.  1995, Baltimore, Maryland: Proceedings, pp. 221-223.
13. K. Guclu and R. Apak, "Investigation of adsorption of free- and bound- EDTA onto red muds for
    modeling the uptake of metal-organic complexes by hydrated oxides", 19th International Meeting on
    Organic Geochemistry, 6-10 Sept. 1999, Istanbul (accepted as presentation).
                                             39

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)
September 1999
Project No. 9
Solidification/Stabilization of Hazardous Wastes
Location
Middle East Technical
University, Ankara, Turkey
Technical Contact
Kahranian Unlu
Middle East Technical
University
Environmental Engineering
Dept.
06531 Ankara, Turkey
Tel: 90-312-210-5869
Fax:90-312-210-1260
E-mail:
kunlu@rorqual . cc .metu.edu.tr
Project Status
Initial Project
Description
Project Dates
Accepted 1998
Final Report 2000
Costs Documented?
No
Media
Soil and solid wastes
from mining and paper
and pulp industries
Technology Type
Solidification/
Stabilization
Contaminants
PCBs, AOX (adsorbable organic halides).
heavy metals
Project Size
Bench Scale
Results Available?
Partially yes
1. INTRODUCTION

This project focuses on investigating the effectiveness of S/S technology by conducting bench scale treatability
tests with contaminated soils and various types of hazardous waste materials. The major objectives of the
project are (i) to investigate the effectiveness and reliability of the S/S technology for the safe disposal of
hazardous wastes containing metal and organic contaminants, (II) to determine the appropriate technical criteria
for applications based on the type and composition of hazardous wastes, and (Hi) to determine the unit costs
associated with the field scale applications of the S/S technology.

2. BACKGROUND

With the enforcement of the regulation of the Control of Hazardous Wastes (C of FIW) in August 1995, the
direct or indirect release of hazardous wastes into the receiving environment in  such a manner that can be
harmful to human health and the environment is banned in Turkey. The main purpose of the regulation is to
provide a legal and technical framework for the management of hazardous wastes throughout the nation. In
this regard, the  regulation is applicable not only to hazardous wastes to be generated in the future, but also
concerns with the existing hazardous wastes and their safe disposal in compliance  with the current regulation.
The  Solidification/Stabilization (S/S) technology is recognized by the Turkish regulation of the C of HW as
a promising new emerging technology for the safe disposal of hazardous wastes.

3. TECHNICAL CONCEPT

The  following technical criteria are considered for the evaluation of the effectiveness of the S/S technology
for the safe disposal  of hazardous wastes containing metal and organic contaminants: (i) determining the
mobility of contaminants in the waste via conducting leaching and  permeability tests on solidified/stabilized
samples; and (ii) determining the strength of solidified samples against deformation and deterioration via
conducting comprehensive strength tests on and measuring microstructural characteristics of solidified
samples. In this study, for metals a residue material from gold mining, for organics  PCB contaminated soil and
AOX containing sludge or wastewater from paper and pulp industry will be used. If necessary, synthetic waste
materials representing the composition of "typical wastes" containing metal and organic contaminants will also
be prepared.

For solidification of waste and encapsulation of contaminants, portland cement  as a binding agent will be
mixed with waste materials at different ratios. This ratio will be determined based  on particle size distribution
                                              40

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)              September 1999

of waste materials. In general, as the fraction of fine particles in the waste increases the amount of portland
cement to be used decreases. On the other hand, as the fraction of coarse particles in the waste increases the
strength of solidified waste against deformation increases at the same ratio of portland cement and waste
material mixture. Waste material and portland cement mixing ratios will  be determined considering these
general facts.

4. ANALYTICAL APPROACH

In this project, for mining residue and PCB-contaminated soil materials, two samples representing fine, and
coarse particle size distribution will  be prepared (total four samples). And for each waste material representing
a given particle size distribution class, two different portland cement mixing ratio will be used. These ratios
will be as follows: for metal contaminants (mining waste) 10 and 20%; for PCB-contaminated soil 20 and
35%; and for AOX containing sludge or wastewater 1:6 and 1:8 waste:portland cement. A total of 10 waste
samples prepared in this manner will be cured nearly twenty eight days to solidify. The following physical tests
and measurements will be performed on these solidified samples: comprehensive strength and microstmctural
tomography, permeability, porosity  and bulk density. In addition to these tests and measurements, on the same
solidified waste samples standard TCLP tests of U.S. EPA will be performed. The same leaching tests will also
be performed on unsolidified samples. On the leachate, pH and concentrations of the following contaminants
will be measured: Cd, Cr, Cu, Fe, Pb, Zn, Ca. Mg, Na, K, Cl, SO4, HCO3, PCB and AOX. Based on the results
of the physical tests and comparisons of the leachate compositions obtained from solidified and unsolidified
waste samples, for each waste type, the effectiveness of the S/S technology in terms of contaminant
encapsulation will be accomplished. For all chemical analyses, U. S. EPA SW-846 standard methods will be
used.

5. RESULTS

Initial chemical and TCLP analyses on gold mining residue material showed that heavy metal (Cd, Cr, Cu, Pb,
and Zn) concentrations are too low to classify the residue material as hazardous waste. Therefore a synthetic
waste is prepared by adding metal salts to the gold mining residue. The final metal concentrations in the
synthetic waste was set to be 1000  mg/kg for Cd, Cr, Cu, Pb, and Zn.

So far unconfined compressive strength and hydraulic conductivity tests have been performed on duplicate
samples of mining waste with fine particle size distribution mixed and cured with 10% portland cement. Before
conducting these tests, additional tests were also performed to determine some physical and the rheological
characteristics of waste: cement mixture. Particle size distribution analysis for the "fine' waste sample mixed
with 10 % portland cement yielded 25 % fine sand, 55 % silt and 20 % clay. This sample has a specific gravity
of 2.72 and a pH of 11. The compaction tests performed to determine the maximum dry density and optimum
moisture  content yielded a maximum dry density value of 1.8 g/cmJ with optimum moisture content of 15 %.
The  samples  used for comprehensive strength and hydraulic conductivity tests after 28-day curing were
prepared  by compacting the waste:cement mixture at  15 % moisture  content to  a  density of 1.8  g/cm3.
Rlieological tests yielded liquid limit value of 28 %, plastic limit value of 18 % and plasticity index value of
10 %. The unconfined compressive strength tests were performed using triaxial shear apparatus. The average
of duplicate samples  yielded an unconfined compressive  strength value of 1153 kPa. Compared with the
comprehensive strength value of 16 MP for ordinary concrete, this seems to be  small. Saturated hydraulic
conductivities of solidified duplicate samples were measured using a flexible wall permeameter, and the
average value determined to be 1.8xlO"9 m/s. Leaching and micro-structural tests for this set of samples and
other aspects of the project are currently under way.

6. HEALTH AND SAFETY

Not available.
                                             41

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)             September 1999




7. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS




Not applicable.




8. COSTS




Not available.




9.CONCLUSIONS




At this stage of the project, the available data are not sufficient to draw any meaningful conclusions.




10. REFERENCES




None.
                                          42

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)
September 1999
Project No. 10
Metal-biofilm Interactions in Sulphate Reducing Bacterial Systems
Location
Under development in
consortium's laboratories
Technical Contact
Prof. Harry Eccles
BNFL,
Research & Technology,
Springfields,
Preston,
Lancashire PR4 OXJ,
UK
Tell 44 1772 762566
Fax 44 1772762891
E-mail hel(fl}bnfl.com
Project Status
Final Report
Project Dates
Project accepted
1998
Final project report
1999
Costs Documented?
No
Contaminants
Metals
Technology Type
Biological
Treatment
Media
Effluents/Ground water
Project Size
Laboratory
Results Available?
Yes
1. INTRODUCTION

The development of Sulphate Reducing Bacteria to remove toxic heavy metals and radionuclides from liquid
effluents and/or contaminated ground waters. The technology is currently at the laboratory scale to provide
fundamental data to enable engineers to design better bioreactors. SRB technology for the removal of toxic
heavy metals has been used on a limited number of occasions. In general the bioreactors have been over-
engineered thus increasing both the  capital and operational costs and consequently the technology is not
perceived  as competitive. With intrinsic bioremediation, under anaerobic conditions, such as wetlands
technology, SRB plays a key role in the sequestration of metals. It is not fully understood if this SRB role is
complementary or pivotal. If the latter function predominates then understanding SRB-metal precipitation
mechanisms could enable the wetlands to be better engineered/controlled leading to more effective in-situ
treatment.

The aim of mis project was to generate new fundamental data by:
    Employing a purpose designed biocell
    Generating fundamental metal precipitation data from this biocell
    Investigating factors affecting growth of sulphate-reducing bacterial (SRB) biofilms
    Quantification of important biofilm parameters on metal immobilisation

2. SITE DESCRIPTION

The studies were carried out in the consortium's laboratories.

3. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROCESS

Biological processes for the removal  of toxic heavy metals are presently less favoured man their chemical /
physicochemical counterparts. Reasons for this are several; one of which is the inability to intensify- the
technology due to the lack of fundamental data. BNFL and its partners used a novel biofilm reactor to provide
such information mat can be used by the consortium's biochemical engineers and biofilm modelers to design
better, smaller and more efficient bioreactors incorporating SRB technology.

These bacteria are capable of reducing sulphate ions in liquid waste streams to hydrogen sulphide, which with
many toxic heavy metals will precipitate them from solution as their insoluble sulphides.
                                             43

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)             September 1999

As the solubility products of these sulphides are very small the final treated effluent will meet the most
stringent specification. Equally as  the  biological system is an  active metabolic one the initial metal
concentrations can be comparatively high i.e. a few hundred ppm.

The project commenced on the 1 April 1996 and was completed on the 31 March 1999.

4. RESULTS AND EVALUATION

At the outset of this project it was appreciated mat consistent, reproducible transferable results were required
from both of the laboratories (Westlakes Scientific Consulting [WSC] and the University of Dundee [UOD])
involved in the project. Equally biofilm characterisation protocols needed to be developed/modified so that
the SRB biofilms grown under a variety of conditions and challenged with several toxic heavy metals could
be comprehensively examined.

1. Biocell Design and Operation

A key component of the project was the provision of sound laboratory data in reasonable time-frames. To
satisfy these and other criteria a purpose designed biocell was constructed by a local specialist engineering
company. Prior to manufacture the design of the biocell with respect to flow regimes for a variety of liquor
flow-rates was simulated using CFD and subsequently verified by both WSC  and UOD. Laminar flow was
achieved throughout (>95%) of the biocell biofilm active region.

The biocell comprised of two chambers separated by a membrane. In some experiments a porous membrane
was employed thus allowing a variety of experiments to be carried out which included for example:

•  The separation of carbon source, or sulphate or heavy metal from the SRB  biofilm.
•  Transfer, by pressure manipulation, of carbon source, or sulphate through the membrane into the biofilm
   with the generated sulphide subsequently coming into contact with the metal  solution.
•  The reverse of the above.

The biocell units were constructed in two sizes (lengths), a larger one (500 mm biofilm active length)  and a
smaller unit (100 mm biofilm active length). The longer biocell was largely used  for growing the initial SRB
biofilm on an appropriate membrane and dissected into lengths that could be accommodated by the smaller
unit. Most of the metal precipitation studies were undertaken in these units.

The philosophy for this arrangement was the period for biofilm growth was not less than 14 days whereas
metal precipitation studies took no more than 2 days to  complete.

2. Factors affecting biofilm growth

A major variable was the identity of the carbon/energy  source  used for culture. In general sulphate reduced
per mol of carbon source consumed was in the order: lactate > ethanol > acetate.  Organic nitrogen (e.g. a
defined vitamin solution) also stimulated yield. However, a complex organic nitrogen source e.g.  yeast extract
did not further stimulate yield. The structure  of the support material also affected  biomass yield. Pore size
stimulated yield between pore sizes of 20-100 join. This appeared to primarily affect the area available for
attachment.

Temperature (maximum growth at SOT), and the substrate concentration also affected growth and sulphate
reduction significantly and Km values  were determined.  No effect was  observed  due to phosphate
concentration,  inorganic N concentration or  support material  or hydrophobicity. Prolonged culture led to
deeper biofilms but the maximum active depth (shown by fluorescein diacetate-staining)  remained at
approximately 500 |im with deeper material appearing to be inactive.


                                             44

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)              September 1999

2.1 Substrate Utilisation
The biofilm flow cell (biocell) was a key element in this project. It allowed a defined area of biofilm to be
incubated under defined conditions of rheology and nutrient supply by recirculating medium from a reservoir
and samples of the recirculating medium can be removed for assay. Substrate-utilisation was studied in the
biocell as a closed system where a fixed quantity of medium was circulated and the substrate was depleted over
time by the metabolic activities of the biofilm.

This system permitted measurement of the concentration and rate of use  of substrates. Sodium lactate  was
rapidly utilised, producing acetate. Varying the concentrations over a 10- to 20-fold range and allowed
determination of lactate utilisation kinetics, which was carried out by personnel engaged on process modeling
(K m @ 1,4 mM). Acetate was utilised very slowly by the biofilm culture and accumulated during experiments
on lactate utilisation as it was produced by SRB  metabolising lactate.

When  acetate was supplied as the sole carbon/energy  source, its  rate of utilisation and the accompanying
sulphate reduction were almost undetectable so that no  kinetic parameters could be determined. The  low
acetate utilisation appeared to result from absence of acetate-degrading organisms from the mixed culture,
probably as a result of selection by maintaining the culture on lactate as sole carbon/energy source. An acetate-
utilising mixed SRB culture was obtained, combined with the lactate-utilising culture and the combined culture
was maintained on mixed lactate and acetate as carbon/energy source. This combined culture utilised acetate
considerably faster man the lactate-grown culture alone.  However, it was not possible to fit a single set of
kinetic parameters to the data.

As the addition of an acetate-utilising culture led to increased acetate utilisation, it appears that the very low
rate of acetate utilisation in the original culture was due to the absence of acetate-degrading organisms.

2.2 Effects of metal uptake on biofilm growth
Biofilms exposed to Cd or Cu in the growth medium accumulated the metal sulphides. Metal sulphide uptake
was accompanied by increased content of protein and  polysaccharide content of the biofilm as well as its
increased thickness.  The increase in polysaccharide was considerably greater than of protein, so that it
appeared that extracellular polysaccharide was secreted  in response to the accumulation of metal sulphides in
the biofilm. The accumulated  metal sulphides were concentrated in the upper part of the biofilm and resulted
in increased biofilm thickness, but the depth of active (fluorescein diacetate-staining) biofilm remained the
same (approximately 500 jam) in metal-loaded biofilms. Metal sulphide deposits could, however, overlie the
active cells in metal-loaded biofilms, which indicates that these deposits did not obstruct diffusion of nutrients
to the biofilm.

3. Metal Precipitation studies

3.1 Metal (Cd and Cu) bioprecipitation
The kinetics and metal mass-balances of Cd and Cu bioprecipitation were studied using the biocell system.
 After flushing sulphide from  the system, the appearance of soluble sulphide in the medium was rapid in the
absence of metals but was delayed, in the presence of Cd or Cu.  The apparent "shortfall" of sulphide  was
stoichiometric with the metal added to the medium, which was consistent  with metal sulphide formation.
However, not all of the metal  sulphide formed was immediately precipitated, as some remained dispersed as
colloidal material. A method of fractionating the metal  into soluble, colloidal and precipitated fractions  was
developed  and  the time-course of formation and transformation  of these fractions was investigated,  this
indicated mat colloid flocculation to form precipitated  solids was relatively slow  compared to sulphide
formation and appeared to be rate-limiting for the overall bioprecipitation process. Data on sulphate reduction,
sulphide formation and colloid flocculation was used  to parameterise and test a mathematical model  that
confirmed the rate-limiting nature of the flocculation step. In continuous culture, with a hydraulic residence
time of 5 h, both Cd and Cu were precipitated. At metal concentrations used in batch experiments (250 jaM),

                                              45

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)              September 1999

almost all metal was precipitated with a small colloidal phase and almost no remaining dissolved metal At 500
and 1000 |iM metal a similar result was observed but with more of the metal remaining in solution and a
similar percentage  (approximately 5-10%) in the colloidal phase. It therefore appeared that the processes
occurring in a continuous culture system were similar to those occurring in batch culture and that the residence
time allowed significant flocculation of the colloidal material to take place. Although it is clearly an important
component, the occurrence of a significant  colloidal phase in metal sulphide bioprecipitation is a novel
observation that does not appear to have been previously reported.

3.2 Iron precipitation
The degree of iron sulphide formation by the biofilm (not previously exposed to FeSO4) was found to depend
upon the initial FeSO4 loading of the medium, with a saturating concentration 0.5mM FeSO4. Under these
conditions 0.86mg/cnT of Fe was taken up by the biofilm, but this represented only 16% of that in the system
the rest precipitated in the system tubing and reservoir because of the biogenic S" in solution.

4. Membrane Studies

4.1 Permeable  membrane
Investigations  into the  flow characterisation of the 2.5mm sintered polyallomer PorvairTM permeable
membrane showed mat a  20-day-old (mature) biofilm made the membrane less permeable, but there was
sufficient fluid flow to allow the biocell to be effective at metal removal. Copper sulphate was used as the test
heavy metal, fed through the membrane along with the lactate for biofilm metabolism. At high flow rates
through the permeable membrane (>0.05mil/min/cm2) copper sulphide fonned a suspension and appeared in
the waste stream, whereas at lower flow rates, where the contact time between the metal  and biofilm was
increased, the amount of copper sulphide in the waste stream was reduced to insignificant levels.

4.2 Cross flow operation using a permeable membrane
The biocell was set up with two channels for recirculating liquor separated by a permeable membrane, which
supported the growing biofilm. The two recirculating liquor streams were only connected via the permeable
membrane. Two  main processes were envisaged to transport material between these streams bulk- phase
transvection due to a pressure difference between the sides of the biocell and diffusion. Experiments varying
the pressure difference  across the  membrane showed that  solutes supplied  in the bulk-phase liquor were
transported proportionally to the exchange of volume, implying that transvection was the main mechanism.
However, sulphide produced by the biofilm was approximately equally distributed between  both sides of the
biocell even at low-pressure differentials, which produced no bulk-phase movement. This indicated that the
sulphide was transported  out of the biofilm in both directions by diffusion. When a metabolically-active
biofilm was grown  on one side of the biocell and metal (Cd) solution was supplied on the other (sterile) side
of the biocell,  bioprecipitation of the Cd occurred, removing it from solution. Cd  was not detected on the
biofilm side of the cell so this arrangement, with the biofilm separated from the metal-containing stream by
a membrane, permits separation of the metal- containing and nutrient streams reducing any environmental risks
from discharge of BOD in the form of nutrients or of toxicity to the biofilm from unprecipitated metals.

5 Modelling Studies

5.1 Biofilm
A model of the biological phenomena occurring within the sulphate reducing bacterial biofilms, has been
developed. The model is based upon the Generalised Repository Model (GRM) developed by BNFL. The
mechanistic  model takes  into account a  complex microbiology based upon Monod type Kinetic, and
incorporates chemical speciation based on the PHREEQE geochemical speciation package. The biofilm code
allows the modelling of eight bacterial groups. All microbial groups in each biofilm layer are subject to growth
and decay. Microbial growth is modeled via two groups of reactions, energy generating reactions and biomass

                                             46

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)              September 1999

generating reactions. Bacterial growth and substrate removal is modeled using Monod kinetics, in which
substrate removal is related to biomass growth through the yield coefficient. Changes to the bulk chemistry-
due to microbial activity within the code are utilised as input data by the chemical speciation component of
the code, PHREEQE.

The  main roles  of PHREEQE are the modelling of mineral precipitation and dissolution,  speciation of
dissolved species, and calculation of the ambient pH. The PHREEQE database has been modified to include
lactate and acetate species, which are of specific interest to this project. Species diffuse into the biofilm and
an equilibrium is reached between adjacent compartments, (i.e. another biofilm layer or, in the case of the
upper biofilm layer, the bulk liquid phase). Microbial degradation changes the concentration of species in the
biofilm layers, and compounds diffuse in and out of the layers tending towards equilibrium. Whilst this is
occurring the speciation component of the code determines the reaction path of the released species.

Speciation is carried out in the bulk liquid phase, and each of the individual biofilm layers. The rate at which
microbial degradation and speciation occur determines the compartment in which the minerals precipitate
Species which become incorporated in a mineral phase, by precipitation, remain in that compartment and are
not subject to diffusion. The inclusion of advection allows a series of model cells to be connected, allowing
a range of experimental and environmental situations to be modeled. After each time step (time taken for
speciation, diffusion, and microbiology), species are able to enter and leave the model cells, via adjacent model
cells, or an external route.

Microbial growth within each layer is dependent on the diffusion of substrate. The model is based upon a
single, or series of model cells, containing a gas phase, bulk liquid phase, biofilm and a substratum.

The model has been success fully applied to results produced by the University of Dundee. It was possible to
model the utilisation of lactate and sulphate within the biofilm. and the precipitation of cadmium sulphide with
a high degree of success. At present the model has had a limited application, as modeling the BNFL biocell
experiments has not utilised the bulk of the models capabilities.

A number of biofilm models are reported in current literature, however none include an extensive microbiology
and such a comprehensive speciation component. The model may be applied to further modelling tasks in the
future, talcing advantage of the full extent of it capabilities.

5.2 Bioreactor Configuration
From the point of view of engineering design, the project has disclosed the following new information:

a) Kinetics
At the start of the project, only one paper was available on tentative reaction kinetics in SRB systems. This
project has shown mat:

- Sulphide production is zero order in sulphate concentration and exhibits a Monod rate dependence on carbon
substrate composition (ignoring complications from acetate utilisation),

- The biofilm kinetics do not alter substantially as the film grows, supporting modeling work presented in the
literature on non-SRB systems mat there is a constant, active biofilm thickness,

- Sulphide production rate does not appear to be affected by the adsorption of insoluble sulphides and kinetics
are dependent on intrinsic kinetics with little effect of diffusional mass transfer in the film,
                                              47

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)              September 1999

- As a consequence of the above, a simple form for the local kinetics at a point in a reactor is possible, thereby
reducing the computational complexity of previous literature models.

b) Metal precipitation
The form of the precipitation of metal sulphide is very important as it exerts a profound effect on reactor
performance and the design of ancillaries to remove insolubles from the reactor outlet stream. This was not
realised at  the  outset of the project and has not, hitherto, been discussed or analysed in the literature.
Nonetheless, the experimental and theoretical work in the project has:


- Allowed estimates of the  rate of flocculation of colloidal material to be made (which  do not appear to be
substantially affected by the presence of the biofilm),

- Allowed estimates of the rate of biofilm capture of colloidal material to be made, and

- Has shown the conditions under  which metal precipitation occurs predominantly either within the biofilm
or in the free solution outside the film.


c) Reactor modeling
The few reactor models for SRB systems in the literature have used very complex biofilm kinetics and have
not considered  practical  issues such as flocculation and precipitation.  A simple reactor model has been
constructed which could be used immediately to interpret the results from a pilot scale reactor. It demonstrates
that very careful process control is important in order to achieve the stringent targets with regard to both
soluble sulphide concentration and soluble metal concentration in the discharged stream. The model indicates
the great sensitivity of the quality of the discharged stream to  changes in key parameters.
                                              48

-------
 NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)
                                            September 1999
Project No. 11
        Predicting the Potential for Natural Attenuation of Organic Contaminants in Groundwater
Location
Operational coal tar processing and
organic chemicals manufacturing plant,
West Midlands. U.K.
Project Status
Second progress
report
      Media
      Groundwater
                Technology Type
                Intrinsic
                bioremediation, natural
                attenuation
Technical Contact
Dr. Steve Thornton,
Groundwater Protection & Restoration
Group,
Dept. of Civil & Structural Engineering,
University of Sheffield, Mappin St.,
SHEFFIELD SI 3JD
United Kingdom
Tel: 0114 222 5744
Fax: 0114 222 5 700
E-mail: s.f.thornton(S> Sheffield .ac.uk
Project Dates
Accepted
Final Report
1998
1999
Contaminants
Coal tars, phenol, cresols, xylenols.
BTEX
Costs Documented?
Not applicable
      Project Size
      Not applicable
                Results Available?
                Yes
 1. INTRODUCTION

 Natural attenuation is an emerging technology, which uses natural biological and chemical processes occurring
 in aquifers to reduce contaminants to acceptable levels. The technology has been used successfully in shallow
 North American aquifers but has not been developed for the deep, fractured, consolidated aquifer systems
 found in the U.K. Technical protocols are available which provide a basis for the performance assessment of
 monitored natural attenuation schemes (Buscheck and O'Reilly, 1995; OSWER, 1997). These have primarily
 evolved from studies of petroleum hydrocarbon and chlorinated solvent spills at sites in North America.
 However, there is little provision within these protocols for interpretation of natural attenuation within the
 hydrogeological settings and range of contaminated sites found in the UK and elsewhere in Europe. The U.K.
 has a legacy  of contaminated industrial sites located  on  deep,  consolidated,  dual-porosity aquifers and
 groundwater pollution from these sites often results in the development of complex plumes.

 The application of natural attenuation technology requires mat there is a framework in place for the robust
 assessment of its performance at  individual sites. This framework needs to incorporate appropriate strategies
 for monitoring natural attenuation processes in situ and predicting the potential for natural attenuation at field
 scale.

 Coal-gasification plants are an important source of soil and groundwater pollution in the U.K. Pollutant
 streams from these facilities typically contain a wide variety of organic and inorganic compounds (e.g. phenolic
 compounds and NFLt), usually at very high concentration. These phenolic compounds are normally
 biodegradable under a range of redox conditions (Suflita et ai, 1989; Klecka et ai, 1990; Rudolphi  et al.,
 1991). However, in comparison with other groups of organic pollutants our understanding of the fate of
 pollutants from coal-gasification plants in U.K. aquifers is poor.

 2. BACKGROUND

 The research site is  an operational coal-tar processing and phenols manufacturing plant, constructed in 1950,
 and situated in the U.K. West Midlands. The plant is located on a deep, unconfined, fractured, Permo-Triassic
 sandstone  aquifer and has  contaminated  the groundwater with a range of phenolic compounds, including
 phenol, cresols, xylenols and BTEX, some at concentrations up to  12,500  mg I"1. The aquifer is naturally
 aerobic, calcareous  at depth and contains  abundant Fe and Mn oxides as grain coatings. Groundwater levels
 are shallow (typically <5mbgl) and the aquifer is 250 m thick in the vicinity  of the site. Groundwater flow is
 4-11 m y"1. The current volume of the plume is about 3  million m3. The total concentration of organic
                                               49

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)              September 1999

compounds in the plume source area is presently 24,800 mg I"1, including 12,500 mg I"1 phenol. Site history
and ground-water flow patterns suggest that spillages started soon after construction of the plant, that is, the
plume is 50 years old. These spillages include mixtures of organic compounds and mineral acids, the latter
giving rise to a SO4 plume with concentrations up to 449 mg I"1. There is no information to indicate when
spillages stopped, although the plume remains anchored by a strong source. The only receptor at risk is a public
supply borehole, located approximately 2 km west of the plant and >100 y travel time from the present plume.

The project objectives are (a), to understand processes controlling the natural attenuation of a complex mixture
of organic pollutants in a U.K. sandstone aquifer, (b), to develop practical techniques to estimate the potential
for natural attenuation and (c), to understand the value of intervening to increase attenuation. The key research
issues are (a), estimating the timing and duration of degradation, (b), understanding the degradation processes
and potential inhibitors, (c), quantifying the role of mineral oxidants in degradation, (d), assessing the supply
of soluble electron acceptors from  dispersion and diffusion at the plume fringe, and (e),  assessing the
contribution of fermentation to degradation.

The  project is  funded primarily  by the  UK Engineering  and Physical Sciences Research Council and
Environment Agency, with additional contributions from the UK Natural Environment Research Council
through affiliated projects. The project began in September 1996, in collaboration with the British Geological
Survey, Institute  of Freshwater Ecology and University of Leeds,  and is  3  years duration. Industrial
collaborators include Laporte Inspec, BP, SAGTA and Aspinwall & Co.

3. TECHNICAL CONCEPT

Simultaneous field investigations, laboratory studies and reactive transport modelling have been initiated and
are ongoing. The field studies have focused on characterization of the baseline groundwater hydrochemistry
and microbiology  in the plume. This was  undertaken to identify- spatial and temporal variations in the
distribution of contaminants, redox processes, dissolved gases, microbial population activity and diversity. Two
comprehensive groundwater quality surveys have been completed for the suite of 25 monitoring boreholes
installed by consultants responsible for the site investigation (Aspinwall & Co., 1992). A basic conceptual
process model of contaminant  attenuation was  developed  with  mis data. High-resolution  multilevel
groundwater samplers (MLS) have been developed and installed in the plume at 130 in and 350 m from the
site, to depths of 30 m  and 45 m below ground level,  respectively. These devices provide a vertical profile
through contaminated and uncontaminated sections of the aquifer at a level of detail unobtainable with the
existing borehole network. The MLS boreholes have been used to quantify- solute fluxes, degradation rates,
redox processes, and identify environmental controls on degradation in the plume. The MLS have been
sampled at quarterly intervals over a year to monitor changes in plume redox conditions and microbial
population dynamics in response to water table fluctuations in  the aquifer. A rock core was recovered
anaerobically from the aquifer, adjacent to one of the MLS boreholes, to provide material as inoculum for
laboratory process studies, for examination of microbial ecology, for analysis of metal oxide and  silicate
mineralogy, and for stable isotope characterization of reduced sulphide and carbonate minerals.

Laboratory microcosm studies using acclimated groundwater and aquifer sediment are in progress to examine
the degradation rates of phenolic mixtures under the range of redox and environmental conditions found in
the plume. The scope of these process studies is  wide and includes an assessment of degradation coupled to
different aqueous and solid phase oxidants, identifying the contribution of fermentation to degradation and
understanding the  broad  controls on degradation  (e.g. oxidant bioavailability and contaminant toxicity).
Different redox systems were established in the  microcosms under different contaminant concentrations in
order to understand the timing and extent of degradation. Initially, aquifer sediment incubated under different
redox conditions in boreholes at the  site was used as inocula in the microcosms. Additional process studies
are now  in progress  using rock core material recovered from the aquifer. These will examine the spatial
variability' in aquifer degradation potential, and quantify the bioavailability of mineral oxidants in degradation
along a vertical profile through the plume.
                                              50

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)              September 1999

Microbiological analysis of groundwater and aquifer sediment samples has focused on understanding the
spatial and temporal variability in the diversity and activity of indigenous microbial populations.  These
variations have been compared forme range of redox conditions and contaminant concentrations found in the
plume, to refine the process model developed from the hydrochemical data and to understand the broad
environmental controls on microbial ecology and aquifer potential for contaminant degradation.

Reactive transport modelling of biodegradation processes in the plume is ongoing. An initial modelling study
was undertaken with the biodegradation code, BIOREDOX, to test the conceptual process model of the plume
and to identify additional modelling objectives. Further transport modelling is now underway in collaboration
with the University of Waterloo in Canada, using a more advanced code. The necessary parameter values, rate
data and processes required for modelling are obtained from the laboratory and field studies. This will provide
an independent assessment of the utility of the approach in predicting contaminant fate at fieldscale.

4. ANALYTICAL APPROACH

Groundwater samples have been collected, anaerobically, for analysis of organic contaminants, dissolved gases
(e.g. N2, CO2, CFLO, major cations, major anions, organic and inorganic (e.g. total inorganic carbon, Fe2+,
Mn2+, S2") metabolites of phenolic compound degradation, nutrients, 34S/32S-SO4,34S/32S-S2~,  13C/12C-CO32",
18O/16O-SO4, organically-complexed and organically-uncomplexed  Fe, and  micro-biological parameters.
Samples have been collected concurrently for analysis of these detenninands on each groundwater survey, to
provide time-series data for comparison. Geochemical modelling of the groundwater quality data has been
completed to identify potential sinks for inorganic products of biodegradation and to refine a carbon mass
balance for the plume.

Microbiological analysis has included enumeration of total and culturable bacteria. Direct measures of in situ
degradation potential have been made on groundwater and aquifer sediment samples by stimulation with NO3
and addition of radiolabeled phenol compounds and other aromatic hydrocarbons. Microbial diversity has been
assessed after inoculation of samples with different nutritional tests.

Rock core samples have been analyzed for oxidation capacity (OXC) and mineral phases (e.g. iron sulphides,
metal oxides, carbonates and aluminosilicates). Permeameter tests and analyses of mineral phase 34S/j2S-S2"
and ^C/'^C-COj2- stable isotopes have also been performed on core samples.

5. RESULTS

The range of redox and microbial processes identified in the plume has demonstrated the aquifer potential for
aerobic and anaerobic degradation of the organic contaminants. Contaminant degradation is occurring under
aerobic, nitrate  reducing, iron/manganese  reducing, sulphate reducing and  methanogenic  conditions, at
contaminant concentrations up to 24,000 mg L"1. Degradation rates and microbial activity are highly variable
and are correlated with contaminant concentrations and electron acceptor availability in the plume. There is
increased microbial activity, diversity and degradation at the plume fringe, in response to the  increased flux
of dissolved oxygen and nitrate from the background groundwater and dilution of contaminant concentrations.
The supply of aqueous oxidants and dilution of contaminants are controlled by mechanical dispersion at the
plume fringe. The mixing zone over which this dispersion occurs is relatively small (2 m) for the plume under
study. A carbon and electron acceptor mass balance for the plume has constrained the plume source term and
suggests mat degradation has not been significant within much of the plume (Thornton et a/.,  1998). The mass
balance suggests mat dissolved oxygen and nitrate, supplied by dispersion, are more important for contaminant
mass  turnover in the plume than other degradation  processes. The  stable  isotope  studies show  that a
contaminant threshold concentration exists for the initiation of sulphate reduction in the plume,  although other
degradation processes appear relatively insensitive to the organic pollutant load.

6. HEALTH AND SAEETY

Not available.

                                             51

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)              September 1999


7. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS

Not available.

8. COSTS

Not available.

9. CONCLUSIONS

A combination of methodologies has been developed to assess the potential for natural attenuation of organic
contaminants at this site.  These methodologies include theoretical approaches and practical, field-based.
technology which provide an improved framework for understanding the behaviour of complex plumes in
aquifers. Contaminant fate in this aquifer system is controlled by a complex plume source history and spatial
variations in the aquifer degradation potential,  as  influenced by  contaminant concentration  and the
bioavailability of oxidants. Source history has a greater impact on contaminant concentrations in this aquifer
than degradation processes. The field and laboratory studies  show that contaminant  mass loss can  be
demonstrated forme range of environmental conditions found in the plume. However, although the phenolic
compounds are biodegradable and the aquifer is not oxidant limited, the plume is likely to grow under the
present conditions.  This is because contaminant concentrations remain toxic to degradation in much of the
plume core and the  supply of aqueous oxidants, via mixing with uncontaminated groundwater, is insufficient
to meet the demand from the plume. Natural attenuation of these organic pollutants in this  system is therefore
likely to increase only after increased dilution of the plume.

10. REFERENCES

1. Aspinwall & Co. (1992). Site Investigation at Synthetic Chemicals Limited, Four Ashes: Phase 6 Report

2. Borden, R. C., Gomez, C. A. and Becker, M. T. (1995). Geochemical indicators of intrinsic bioremediation.
    Ground Water, 33, 180-189.

3. Buscheck, T. and O' Reilly, K. (1995). Protocol for monitoring intrinsic bioremediation in groundwater.
   Chevron Research and Technology Company, pp. 20.

4.  Klecka, G. M., Davis, J. W., Gray, D. R. and Madsen, S. S. (1990). Natural  bioremediation of organic
    contaminants in ground water: Cliff-Dow Superfund site. Ground Water. 28, 534-543.

5.  OSWER (1997). Use of Monitored Natural Attenuation at Superfund, RCRA Corrective Action, and
    Underground Storage Tank Sites, Directive 9200.4-17, US EPA.

6.  Rudolphi, A., Tschech, A. and Fuchs, G. (1991). Anaerobic degradation of cresols by denitrifying bacteria.
   Archives of Microbiology, 155, 238-248.

7. Suflita. J. M., Liang, L. and Saxena, A. (1989).  The anaerobic biodegradation of o-, m- and p-cresol by
    sulfate-reducing bacterial  enrichment cultures obtained from a shallow anoxic aquifer. Journal of
   Industrial Microbiology, 4, 255-266.

8. Thornton, S. F., Davison, R. M. Lerner, D. N. and. Banwart, S. A. (1998). Electron balances in field studies
    of intrinsic remediation. M. Herbert and K. Kovar (eds), GO 98—Groundwater Quality: Remediation and
    Protection. Proceedings of a conference held at Tubingen, September 1998. IAHS publication 250: 273-
    282.
                                             52

-------
 NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)
                                           September 1999
Project No. 12
                    Treatability Test for Enhanced In Situ Anaerobic Dechlorination
Location
1.   Cape Canaveral Air Station, FL
2.   Naval Air Station Alameda, CA
3.   Fort Lewis, WA
4.   To be determined
5.   To be determined
Project Status
Interim Report
Media
Groundwater
Technology Type
In Situ Bioremediation
Technical Contact
Lt. Lisa Ackert
AFRL/MLQ
139 Barnes Drive, Suite 2
Tyndall AFB, FL 32403
Tel: 850-283-6308
Fax: 850-283-6064
E-mail: lisa.ackert@mlq.afrl.af.mil

Catherine Vogel
DoD SERDP/ESTCP
Cleanup Program Manager
901 N. Stuart Street, Suite 303
Arlington, VA 22203
Tel: (703) 696-2118
Fax:(703)696-2114
E-mail: vogelc@acq.osd.mil
Project Dates
Accepted    1999
Final Report 2001
Contaminants
tetrachloroethylene (PCE) and
trichloroethylene (TCE)
Costs Documented?
Soon
Project Size
Field
Treatability
Testing
Results Available?
Soon
 1. INTRODUCTION

 Chloroethene compounds, such as tetrachloroethene (PCE) and trichloroethene (TCE). have been widely used
 for a variety of industrial purposes. Past disposal practices, accidental spills, and a lack of understanding of
 the fate of these chemicals in the environment have led to widespread contamination at U.S. Department of
 Defense (DoD) and industrial facilities. Enhanced anaerobic dechlorination is a very promising bioremediation
 treatment approach for remediating chlorinated ethene-contaminated groundwater. The goal of this effort is
 to develop and validate a comprehensive approach for conducting a treatability test to determine the potential
 for applying reductive anaerobic biological in situ treatment technology (RABITT) at any specific site. A
 treatability protocol has been written (Morse. 1998) and will be applied to five DoD chlorinated solvent
 contamination sites in the United States. Based on the field test results, the protocol will be revised as needed
 upon completion of the effort.

 2. BACKGROUND

 Because both PCE and TCE are stable compounds mat resist aerobic degradation or require the presence of
 an electron-donating co-contaminant for anaerobic transformation, these compounds tend to persist in the
 environment. However, in reductive systems, highly oxidized contaminants (e.g., PCE) can be utilized as
 electron acceptors. RABITT  attempts to stimulate this reductive pathway by supplying  excess reduced
 substrate  (electron donor) to the native microbial consortium. The presence of the substrate expedites the
 exhaustion of any naturally occurring electron acceptors. As the natural  electron acceptors are depleted,
 microorganisms capable of discharging  electrons  to oilier available electron acceptors, such as oxidized
 contaminants, gain a selective advantage.
                                              53

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)              September 1999

The reductive dechloriiiation of PCE to ethene proceeds through a series of hydrogenolysis reactions shown
in Figure 1 . Each reaction becomes progressively more difficult to carry out.
                             Figure 1. Reductive Dechloriiiation of PCE

The selection of an appropriate electron donor may be the most important design parameter for developing a
healthy population of microorganisms capable of dechlorinating PCE and TCE. Recent studies have indicated
a prominent role for molecular hydrogen (H2) in the reductive dechlorination process (Holliger et al., 1993;
DiStefano et al., 1992; Maymo-Gatell et al., 1995; Gossett et al., 1994; Zinder and Gossett, 1995). Most known
dechlorinators can use H2 as an electron donor, and some can only use H2. Because more complex electron
donors are broken down into metabolites and residual pools of H2 by other members of the microbial
community, they may also  be used to support dechlorination (Fennell et al., 1997; Smatlak et al., 1996;
DiStefano et al., 1992).

The rate and quantity of H2  made available to a degrading consortium must be carefully engineered to limit
competition for hydrogen from other microbial groups, such as metlianogens and sulfate-reducers. Competition
for H2 by metlianogens is a common cause of dechlorination failure in laboratory7 studies. As the methanogen
population increases, the portion of reducing equivalents used for dechlorination quickly drops and methane
production increases (Gossett et al.. 1994; Fennel et al.. 1997). The use of slowly degrading nonmethanogenic
substrates will help prevent this type of system shutdown.

Because  of the  complex  microbial  processes  involved  in anaerobic  dechlorination,  thorough  site
characterization and laboratory microcosm testing are an important part of the RABITT protocol. The protocol
presents a phased or tiered approach to the treatability test, allowing the user to screen out RABITT in the early
stages of the process to save time and cost. The protocol guides the user through a decision process in which
information is collected and evaluated to determine if the technology should be given further consideration.
RABITT would be screened out if it is determined that site-specific characteristics, regulatory constraints, or
other logistic problems suggest that the technology will be difficult or impossible to employ, or if competing
technology clearly is superior.

The first phase of the treatability test includes a thorough review of existing site data to develop a conceptual
model of the site. The protocol contains a rating system that can be used to assess the suitability of a site for
RABITT testing. The  rating  system  is based on an analysis  of the  contaminant,  hydrogeologic,  and
geochemical profiles of the site. The decision to proceed with the RABITT screening process should be
supported by data indicating that the site meets the requirements for successful technology application. The
second phase of the approach involves selecting a candidate test plot location within the plume for more
detailed site characterization. Characterization activities will examine contaminant, geochemical,  and
hydrogeologic parameters on a relatively small scale to determine the selected location's suitability as a
RABITT test plot. Based on the information generated during the characterization of the test plot, a decision
is made to proceed to phase three of the treatability study, which consists of conducting laboratory microcosm
studies. The microcosm studies are conducted to determine what electron donor/nutrient formulation should
be field-tested to provide optimum biological degradation performance. If the results from the microcosm
testing indicate that reductive dechlorination does  not occur in response to the addition of electron donors
and/or nutrients, the technology is eliminated from further consideration. The fourth and final phase of the
treatability test entails field testing the electron donor/nutrient formulation determined in the  laboratory
microcosm tests to be most effective for supporting biologically mediated reductive dechlorination. The data
from this phased treatability test indicate the potential for the microbiological component of RABITT and are
used to make the decision to proceed to pilot-scale or full-scale implementation of RABITT.

                                              54

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)              September 1999

This effort consists of applying the protocol to five chlorinated solvent contamination sites. Currently the field
treatability test systems are operating at two locations. Cape Canaveral Air Station. FL and Naval Air Station
Alameda, CA. Microcosm studies will begin in August 1999, using contaminated aquifer material from a site
at Ft Lewis, WA which is the proposed location for site number three. The fourth and fifth field locations are
yet to determined.

3. TECHNICAL CONCEPT

Site #1: Cape Canaveral Air Station. FL

Site Description: Facility 1381, the Ordnance Support Facility at Cape Canaveral Air Station,  contains a
shallow, 110-acre volatile organic contaminant (VOC) plume consisting primarily of TCE, DCE and VC.
Improper disposal of solvents used for cleaning and degreasing operations contributed to this groundwater
contamination plume. Field data suggest that TCE is naturally being dechlorinated to DCE and subsequently
to VC; however these contaminants have been detected in a surface water body adjacent to the site. This has
prompted the state and federal environmental  regulators to require a corrective measures study of various
remedial options.

The geology at the site is characterized by poorly sorted coarse to fine sands and shell material from ground
surface to approximately 35 ft below ground surface (bgs). From approximately 35 ft to 50 ft bgs, sands show
a decrease in grain size and the silt and clay content increases. From 48.5 ft to 51 ft bgs, a continuous clay unit
appears to underlie the entire  area at Facility 1381. Groundwater at the site is very shallow, generally ranging
between 4 and 7 ft bgs. The hydraulic conductivity for the shallow groundwater has been determined to be
approximately 88.7 ft/day. The pH of the groundwater ranged from 6.87 to 8.14 and conductivity readings
ranged from 464 to 5,550 umhos/cm. The groundwater flow velocity has been calculated to be 0.21  ft/day. The
suspected source area contains high levels of TCE (up to 342 mg/L) but TCE concentrations drop off quickly
and only DCE and VC are detected towards the edges of the plume.

RABITT Testing: The ability of yeast extract, propionate. lactate, butyrate, and lactate/benzoate to stimulate
anaerobic dechlorination of TCE was evaluated in laboratory microcosm studies using contaminated aquifer
material. Butyrate and the lactate/benzoate mixture stimulated the complete conversion  of TCE to ethene.
Based on these laboratory results, the decision  was made to proceed with the field treatability test.

The standard RABITT field treatability test design consists of an extraction/amendment/reinjection system
within a small test plot. Contaminated groundwater is extracted near the end of the treatment plot, amended
with nutrients and/or electron donor, and then reinjected near the head of the treatment plot. This design
creates  a hydraulic gradient to direct the flow of groundwater through the treatment plot. Multi-level
monitoring points are placed within the treatment plot,  in between  the injection and extraction  wells.
Groundwater extraction and injection are optimized to achieve a 30-day hydraulic residence time within the
treatment plot.

This standard RABITT design had to be modified for the site at Cape Canaveral Air Station in order to meet
the State of Florida Underground Injection Control regulatory requirements. This regulation does not allow
for reinjection of contaminated groundwater. The objective of the modified system was to allow for effective
deliver}' and  distribution of nutrients  and electron donors and to provide for extensive  monitoring and
hydraulic control, without pumping groundwater above ground.

The modified design consisted of two communicating wells, a series of 13 tri-level groundwater monitoring
probes,  and upgradient and downgradient monitoring wells. The system wells are a dual screen design, with
one operating in an upflow mode and the other in a downflow mode. The wells are placed close enough to
effect each other with the effluent from one well feeding the other. This results in groundwater circulation that
can be used to mix and distribute the electron donor/nutrient formulation. The tri-level groundwater monitoring
probes are positioned around the treatment cell to provide three-dimensional data that are required to track the

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)              September 1999

tracer and added electron donor/nutrients, calculate mass reductions during treatment, and evaluate gains and
losses from the treatment cell through background groundwater migration.

The modified  system was  installed at Facility  1381 in March 1999 and will operate for six months. The
electron donor selected for field-testing was lactic acid.  Lactic acid is added to the treatment cell at a
concentration and flow rate to achieve an in situ concentration of 2-6 mM.

Site #2: Naval Air Station Alameda. CA

Site Description: Building 360 (Site #4) at Naval Air Station Alameda was selected for the 2nd demonstration.
This building has been used as an aircraft engine repair and testing facility, and consisted of former machine
shops, cleaning areas, as well as plating and welding shops and parts assembly areas. Solvents used in the
cleaning  shop of Building 360 have  included  a  mixture of 55% PCE  and other chemicals such as
dichlorobenzene, methylene chloride, toluene and 30-70% solutions of sodium hydroxide. Site characterization
activities performed by the facility revealed elevated levels  of chlorinated solvents, primarily TCE (24 ppm),
DCE (8.6 ppm) and VC (2.2 ppm) detected between 5.5 and 15.5 feet bgs.

Depth to groundwater in the Building 360 area ranged between 4.4 feet and 6.5 feet bgs.  Aquifer testing
yielded hydraulic conductivity values from 1.22 x 10° to 3.86 x 10° cm/sec. The estimated groundwater flow
is very low at only 1.1 x 10" cm/sec or 11.4 ft/year. It appears that groundwater in this area is very nearly
stagnant.

RABITT Testing: The ability of yeast extract, propionate, lactate, butyrate, and lactate/benzoate to stimulate
anaerobic dechlorination of TCE was evaluated in laboratory microcosm studies using contaminated aquifer
material. Yeast extract, butyrate, and lactate stimulated the  complete conversion of TCE to ethene. Based on
these laboratory results, the decision was made to  proceed with the field treatability test.

The standard RABITT field treatability test was installed at the Alameda site. The system was installed in May
1999 and will operate for six months. The electron donor selected for field-testing was a mixture of butyric
acid and yeast extract. Butyric acid and yeast extract are added to the treatment cell at a concentration and flow
rate to achieve in situ concentrations of 3 mM butyric acid  and 20 mg/L yeast extract.

4. ANALYTICAL APPROACH

A summary of soil and groundwater analytes is presented here. For detailed information on sample collection
techniques or analytical methods, please refer to Morse, et  al. 1998.

Site Characterization Activities: Soil cores are visually examined for soil type and stratigraphy. In addition,
soil core  subsamples are  sent to an off-site laboratory and analyzed  for  VOCs, TOC, and Total Iron.
Groundwater samples are analyzed for the following parameters; dissolved oxygen, temperature, pH, Fe+",
conductivity, chloroethenes, dissolved organic carbon, ammonia. CFL;, C2H4, C2H6, NO3, NO2, SO4, Cl, Br,
alkalinity, and total iron.

Performance Monitoring of the Field Test Cell: Table 1 presents the performance monitoring parameters and
their measurement frequency during field-testing.
                                              56

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)
September 1999
                          Table 1: Performance Monitoring Parameters
Parameter
TCE, cis-DCE, VC, ethene
Volatile Fatty Acids (electron
donor)
Bromide
Dissolved Oxygen
PH
Conductivity
T^ +2
Fe
Crl4, C2rl4, C2rl6
NO3, NO2, SO4, Cl
Alkalinity
Measurement
Site
Lab
Lab
Field and Lab
Field
Field
Field
Field
Lab
lab
Lab
Measurement Frequency
Initial, baseline, and biweekly
Initial, baseline, and biweekly
Initial, baseline, and biweekly
Initial, baseline, and biweekly
Initial, baseline, and biweekly
Initial, baseline, and biweekly
Initial, baseline, and biweekly
Baseline and monthly
Baseline and monthly
Baseline and monthly
5. RESULTS

Results from the RABITT field treatability testing at Cape Canaveral Air Station, Naval Air Station Alameda,
and Fort Lewis will be presented in the next interim report.

6. HEALTH AND SAEETY

Activities conducted during RABITT system installation and operation mat could potentially cause health and
safety hazards include drilling with hollow-stem augers or direct push methods, soil and groundwater sample
collection, and replenishing concentrated stock solutions (tracer, nutrient, electron donor solutions). Potential
hazards include exposure to organic contaminants and other chemicals used in stock solutions, exposure to
organic vapors, objects striking feet or eyes, and electrical shock. Appropriate safety precautions and protective
equipment is utilized to minimize or eliminate health and safety hazards.

7. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS

Because the contaminants are biologically transformed in situ into non-hazardous compounds (e.g., ethene),
the RABITT treatability test does not produce a process waste stream. Characterization and sampling activities
generate a small amount of contaminated soil and groundwater that must be properly disposed of.

8. COSTS

Detailed costs for all phases of the RABITT treatability approach will be presented in the final report.

9. CONCLUSIONS

Two of the five  planned RABITT treatability test systems have  been installed and are currently being
monitored. By the time of the Year 2000 NATO/CCMS meeting, three of the tests should be completed and
the final two systems will be operating.

10. REFERENCES

DiStefano, T.D., J.M. Gossett, and S.H.  Zinder. 1991. "Reductive Dechlorination of High Concentrations of
Tetrachloroethene to Ethene by an Anaerobic Enrichment Culture in the Absence of Msthanogenesis." Applied
and Environmental Microbiology 57(8): 2287-2292.
                                            57

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)              September 1999

DiStefano, T.D., J.M. Gossett, and S.H. Zinder. 1992. '"Hydrogen as an Electron donor for Dechlorination of
Tetrachloroethene by an Anaerobic Mixed Culture." Applied and EnvironmentalI Microbiology 58(11): 3622-
3629.

Fenneil, D.E., J.M. Gossett. and S.H. Zinder. 1997. "Comparison of Butyric Acid, Ethanol, Lactic Acid, and
Propionic Acid as Hydrogen Donors for the Reductive Dechlorination of Tetrachloroetliene. " Environmental
Science & Technology! 31: 918-926.

Gossett, J.M., T.D. DiStefano, and M.A. Stover.  1994. Biological Degradation of Tetrachloroethylene in
Methanogenic Conditions. U.S. Air Force Technical Report No. AL/EQ-TR-1983-0026, USAF Armstrong
Laboratory, Environics Directorate, Tyndall AFB, FL.

Holliger, C., G. Schraa, A.J.M. Stams, and A.J.B. Zehnder. 1993. "A Highly Purified Enrichment Culture
Couples  the Reductive Dechlorination  of Tetrachloroetliene to Growth"  Applied and  Environmental
Microbiology 59(9): 2991-2997.

Maymo-Gatell,  X., V. Tandoi, J.M. Gossett, and  S.H. Zinder.  1995. "'Characterization of an H2-Utilizing
Enrichment Culture  that Reductively Dechlorinates Tetrachloroetliene to Vinyl Chloride and Etliene in the
Absence of Methanogenesis and Acetogenesis. " Appliedand Environmental Microbiology 61(11): 3928-3933.

Morse, J. J., B.C. Alleman, J.M. Gossett, S.H. Zinder, D.E. Fennell, G.W. Sewell, CM. Vogel. 1998. Draft
Technical Protocol - A Treatability Test for Evaluating the Potential Applicability of the Reductive Anaerobic
Biological In Situ Treatment Technology (RABITT) to Remediate Chloroethenes. DoD Environmental Security
Technology Certification Program. Document can be downloaded from www.estcp.org.

Smatlak, C.R.,  J.M. Gossett, and S.H. Zinder. 1996. "Comparative ICinetics of Hydrogen Utilization for
Reductive Dechlorination of Tetrachloroethene and Methanogenesis in an Anaerobic Enrichment Culture/'
Environmental Science and Technology 30(9) 2850-2858.

Zinder,  S.H., and J.M. Gossett. 1995. "Reductive Dechlorination of Tetrachloroethene by a High Rate
Anaerobic Microbial Consortium." Environmental Health Perspectives 103: 5-7.
                                             58

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)
                                                  September 1999
 Project No. 13
            Permeable Reactive Barriers for In Situ Treatment of Chlorinated Solvents
 Location
 Dover AFB, DE
Project Status
Interim
Media
Groundwater
Technology Type
In situ abiotic
destruction of
contaminants
 Technical Contacts
 Alison Thomas
 AFRL/MLQE
 Tyndall AFB, FL 32403-5323
 Tel: 850-283-6303
 Fax: 850-283-6064
 E-mail:
 alison.lightner@mlq.afrl.af.mil

 Catherine Vogel
 DoD SERDP/ESTCP
 Cleanup Program Manager
 901 N. Stuart Street, Suite 303
 Arlington, VA 22203
 Tel: (703) 696-2118
 Fax:(703)696-2114
 E-mail: vogelc@acq.osd.mil
Project Dates
Accepted     1999
Final Report  2000
Contaminants
Chlorinated solvents: PCE. DCE, TCE
Costs Documented?
                    Project Size
                    Pilot-scale
                        Results Available?
1. INTRODUCTION

The use of the funnel-and-gate approach to treat groundwater is being commercialized. However, researchers
are currently working on improved reactive materials to place in the gate portion of the wall. The objectives
of this project are to determine the effectiveness of alternative reactive media for the funnel-and-gate system
at the field-scale level. Engineering and cost data will also be generated and included in a validated design
guidance manual (to be published in late 1999).

2. BACKGROUND

Area 5 at Dover Air Force Base (AFB), Delaware was selected for the permeable barrier demonstration
because it has a suitable aquifer containing perchloroethylene (PCE), trichloroethylene (TCE), and dichloro-
ethylene (DCE). It has a reasonably deep aquifer, competent aquitard (confining layer), and significant
concentrations of chlorinated solvents (several parts per million). This site has several challenges that have not
been studied in barrier installations to date. Shallow regions of the aquifer have high levels of dissolved oxygen
(DO). High DO causes precipitation at the front end of the barrier that may result in plugging of the reactive
media and development of preferential flow paths over time.  DCE, which exists  in relatively high
concentrations,  is  somewhat more resistant to reduction than PCE and TCE. Significant variability in the
seasonal groundwater flow direction could affect the hydraulic capture of the plume. Finally, underground
utilities complicated the barrier installation.

3. TECHNICAL  CONCEPT

The main objective of this demonstration is the testing of alternative reactive media at a field-scale, proof-of-
principle demonstration for in situ permeable reactive barriers. A funnel-and-gate system consisting of two
separate 8-foot wide gates was installed in December 1997. This demonstration includes the testing of two
reactive media schemes and also involved innovative emplacement methods to reduce the construction costs
                                             59

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)              September 1999

of permeable barrier systems. The 45-foot deep barriers were constructed with 8-foot diameter caissons that
were removed after media emplacement. The funnel sections were constructed using Waterloo interlocking
sheet piling driven to the 45-foot depth and keyed into the underlying clay aquitard. One gate was filled with
zero-valent iron filings with a 10 percent iron/sand pretreatment zone to stabilize flow and remove dissolved
oxygen. The second gate was also filled with zero-valent iron but is preceded by a 10 percent pyrite/sand
mixture to moderate the pH of the reactive bed, thereby decreasing precipitate formation.

Monitoring wells were placed in the aquifer (both up gradient and down gradient from the reactive barrier) and
within both of the treatment gates. Monitoring of these wells during a period of one year after the barrier
installation will  study the following parameters:

 •  contaminant and byproduct concentrations along the flow paths
 •  reaction rates of dechlorination processes
 •  dissolved oxygen consumption in the pretreatment zone of each gate
 •  water levels within the gates to evaluate residence times
 •  upgradient water levels to evaluate flow divides and capture zones
 •  downgradient water levels to gain knowledge of remixing and flow conditions downstream from the barrier
 •  homogeneous or preferential flow
 •  inorganic water quality parameters

A permeable barrier design guidance document was concurrently developed and reviewed by state and federal
regulators. The design guidance addresses treatability testing, design, installation, and monitoring of barrier
technologies in variable geological settings. The design guidance includes input from the Air Force, Army,
Navy,  numerous industry partners, state and  federal regulators and  the Remediation  Technologies
Development Forum Permeable Barriers Action Team. Data from the Dover AFB demonstration will be used
to  "validate" the design guidance  manual. The validated guidance manual will be distributed at the
NATO/CCMS meeting in 2000.

4. ANALYTICAL APPROACH

Groundwater from monitoring points upgradient, downgradient, and within  the iron wall is collected and
analyzed for the  following parameters: PCE, TCE, cis-DCE, dissolved oxygen, conductivity,  pH, calcium,
magnesium, alkalinity, sulfate, and nitrate.

5. RESULTS

Monitoring done to date  indicates that the permeable reactive barrier at Area 5 is performing as designed in
terms of contaminant destruction, control of inorganic constituents build up, and hydraulic flow. Although the
VOCs currently entering  the barrier are at sufficiently high concentrations (60-70 times above their respective
drinking water limits) to  indicate the effectiveness of the barrier, higher concentrations would make it easier
to compare any differences in the performance of the two gates (and the two media). In order to  address these
issues the following tasks will be accomplished:

(1)  Several mini-sampling events will be conducted to measure water levels and sample groundwater (for
    chlorinated ethenes)  from a few select well to monitor influent VOC concentrations.

(2)  Another comprehensive monitoring event will  be conducted when higher water level conditions are
expected in the Area 5 location.

6. HEALTH AND SAFETY

Not available.
                                             60

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)            September 1999




7. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS




Not available.




8. COSTS




Cost information will be provided in the final report.




9. CONCLUSIONS




Final conclusions will be presented at the NATO/CCMS meeting in 2000.




10. REFERENCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY




None.

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)
                                                   September 1999
 Project No. 14

   Thermal Cleanups using Dynamic Underground Stripping and Hydrous Pyrolysis/Oxidation
 Location
 LLNL Gasoline Spill Site,
 Livermore, CA.

 Visalia Pole Yard. Visalia,
 CA.
Project Status
Final Report
Contaminants
PAHs, diesel and
pentachlorophenol
(Visalia)
Gasoline (LLNL)
(TCE, solvents and fuels
  at other sites)	
Technology Type
Dynamic
Underground
Stripping and
Hydrous Pyrolysis/
Oxidation
 Technical Contacts
 Robin L. Newmark
 Lawrence Livermore National
 Laboratory
 L-208, P.O. Box 808
 Livermore, Ca., 94550
 United States
 Tel: (925)423-3644
 Fax: (925)-422-3925
 E-mail: newmark'fflllnl.gov

 Paul M. Beam
 U.S. Department of Energy
 19901 Germantown Road
 Germantown, MD 20874-
 1290
 United States
 Tel: 301-903-8133
 Fax: 301-903-3877
 E-mail:
               . doe.gov
Project Dates
Accepted 1998
Media
Groundwater and soil
Costs Documented?
Yes
Project Size
Full-scale:

Livermore: 100,000yd3
 (76,000 m3)

Visalia: 4.3 acres, >130 ft
deep (app. 600,000 m3)
Results Available?
Yes
1. INTRODUCTION

In the early 1990s, in collaboration with the School of Engineering at the University of California, Berkeley,
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory developed dynamic underground stripping (DUS), a method for
treating subsurface contaminants with heat that is much faster and more effective than traditional treatment
methods. More recently, Livermore scientists developed hydrous pyrolysis/oxidation (HPO), which introduces
both heat and oxygen to the subsurface to convert contaminants in the ground to such benign products as
carbon dioxide, chloride ion, and water. This process has effectively destroyed all contaminants it encountered
in laboratory tests.

With dynamic underground stripping, the contaminants are vaporized and vacuumed out of the ground, leaving
them still to be destroyed elsewhere. Hydrous pyrolysis/oxidation technology takes the cleanup process one
step further by eliminating the treatment,  handling, and disposal  requirements  and destroying the
contamination in the ground. When used in combination, HPO is especially useful in the final "polishing" of
a site containing significant free-product contaminant, once the majority of the contaminant has been removed.
                                             62

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)              September 1999

2. BACKGROUND

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) Gasoline Spill Site:

LLNL recently completed the cleanup and closure of a moderate-sized spill site in which thermal cleanup
methods, and the associated control technologies, were used to remediate nearly 8,000 gallons (30,000 L)
of gasoline trapped in soil both above and below the standing water table. The spill originated from a
group of underground tanks, from which an estimated 17,000 gallons (64,000 L) of gasoline leaked
sometime between 1952 and  1979. The gasoline penetrated the soil, eventually reaching the water table,
where it spread out. Gasoline trapped up to 30 ft (9 m) below  the water table was mere due to a rise in the
water table after the spill occurred, with the gasoline held below water by capillary forces in the soil.
Groundwater contamination extended about 650 ft (200 m) beyond the central spill area. The soils at the
site are alluvial, ranging from very fine silt/clay layers to extremely coarse gravels, with unit permeabilities
ranging over several orders of magnitude. The site was prepared for long-term groundwater pump-and-treat
with vapor extraction; recovery rates prior to thermal treatment were about 2.5 gal/day 9.5 L /day).

Visalia Pole Yard:

In 1997, DUS and HPO were applied for cleanup of a 4.3 acre (17,000 m2) site in Visalia, California, owned
by Southern California Edison Co. (Edison). The utility company had used the site since the 1920s to treat
utility poles by dipping them into creosote, a pentachlorophenol compound, or both. By the 1970s, it was
estimated that 40-80,000 gallons  (150,000-300,000 L) of DNAPL product composed  of pole-treating
chemicals (primarily creosote and  pentachlorophenol) and an oil-based carrier fluid had penetrated the
subsurface to depths of approximately 100 ft (30 m), 40 ft (12 m) below the water table. Edison had been
conducting pump and treat operations  at the site for nearly 20 years. While this activity had successfully
reduced the size of the offsite groundwater contaminant plume, it was not very effective at removing the NAPL
source. Prior to thermal treatment, about 10 Ib. (4.5 kg) of contaminant was being recovered per week.
Bioremediation of the free-organic liquids is expected be prohibitively slow (enhanced bioremediation was
predicted to take at least 120 years).
3. TECHNICAL CONCEPT

Dynamic Underground Stripping (DUS): mobilization and recovery

Dynamic Underground Stripping combines two methods to heat the soil, vaporizing trapped contaminants.
Permeable layers (e.g., gravels) are amenable to heating by steam injection, and impermeable layers (e.g.,
clays) can be heated by electric current. These complementary heating techniques are extremely effective for
heating heterogeneous soils; in more  uniform conditions, only one or the oilier may be applied.  Once
vaporized, the contaminants are removed by vacuum extraction. These processes - from the heating of the soil
to the removal of the contaminated vapor - are monitored and guided by underground imaging, which assures
effective treatment through in situ process control.

Hydrous Pyrolysis/Oxidation  (HPO): in situ destruction

At temperatures achieved by steam injection, organic compounds will readily oxidize over periods of days to
weeks. By introducing both heat and oxygen, this process has effectively destroyed all petroleum and solvent
contaminants that have been tested in the laboratory. All that is required is for water, heat, oxygen, and the
contaminant to be together; hence  the name. After the free organic liquids are gone, this oxidation will
continue to remove low-level contamination. The oxidation of contaminants at steam temperatures is extremely
rapid (less man one week for TCE and two weeks for naphthalene) if sufficient oxygen is present. In HPO, the
dense, nonaqueous-phase liquids and dissolved contaminants are destroyed in place without surface treatment,
thereby improving the rate and efficiency of remediation by rendering the hazardous materials benign by a
completely in situ process. Because the subsurface is heated during the process, HPO takes  advantage of the
                                             63

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)              September 1999

large increase in mass transfer rates, such as increased diffusion out of silty sediments, making contaminants
more available for destruction.

Underground Imaging: process control

Most subsurface environmental restoration processes cannot be observed while operating. Electrical Resistance
Tomography (ERT) has proven to be an excellent technique for obtaining near-real-time images of the heated
zones. ERT gives the operator detailed subsurface views of the hot and cold zones at their site on a daily basis.
Heating soil produces such a large change in its electrical properties that it is possible to obtain images between
wells (inverted from low voltage electrical impulses passed between) of the actual heated volumes by methods
similar to CAT scans. Combined with temperature measurements, ERT provides process control to ensure that
all the soil is treated.

LLNL Gasoline Spill Site: DUS

The DUS application at the LLNL Gasoline Spill Site was designed to remove free-product NAPL. The
targeted volume was a cylinder about 120 ft (36 m) in diameter and 80 ft (24 m) high, extending from a depth
of 60 ft (18 m) to a depth of 140 ft (43 m). The water table is located at 100 ft (30 m). Due to the presence of
relatively thick clay-rich zones, both electrical heating and steam injection were required to  heat the target
volume.

Visalia Pole Yard: DUS + HPO

Thermal treatment (DUS steam injection and vacuum extraction) was chosen for removal of the free product
contaminant. The overall objectives of thennal remediation of the Visalia Pole Yard are to remove a substantial
portion  of the DNAPL contaminant  at the  site, thereby enhancing  the bioremediation  of remaining
contaminant. This is expected to significantly shorten the time to site closure as well as improve the accuracy
of the prediction of time to closure. As part of the final removal process, Edison is also implementing hydrous
pyrolysis (HPO), an in situ method of destroying organic contaminants using small amounts of supplemental
air or oxygen. The primary use of HPO at this site is for destruction of residual pentachlorophenol, which will
not readily steam strip due to high solubility and low vapor pressure. The combination of rapid recovery and
thennal destruction is expected to permit Edison to achieve their cleanup goals, which included termination
of groundwater treatment.

A series of noble gas tracer tests were conducted to verify the extent of HPO under field conditions. Evidence
of hydrous pyrolysis/oxidation came from the disappearance of dissolved oxygen, the appearance of oxidized
intermediate products, the production of CO2, and the distinct isotopic signature of the carbon in the CO2
produced, indicating contaminant origin. These results constrain the destruction rates throughout the site, and
enable site management to make accurate estimates of total in situ destruction based on the recovered  carbon
using the system-wide contaminant tracking system being used on the site.

4. ANALYTICAL APPROACH

Standard laboratory analyses were performed on all samples unless noted specifically in the references.

5. RESULTS

LLNL Gasoline Spill Site:

During 21 weeks of thermal treatment operations conducted over about a year, DUS treatment removed more
than 7600 gallons (29,000 L) of an estimated 6200 gallons (23,000  L) of gasoline trapped in soil both above
and below the water table. Prior to thermal treatment, separate phase contamination extended to > 120 ft (37
                                3
m) deep. Approximately 100,000 yd (76,000 m) were cleaned. The maximum removal rate was 250 gallons

                                             64

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)             September 1999

(950 L) of gasoline a day. The process was limited only by the ability to treat the contaminated fluids and
vapors on the surface.

Dynamic underground stripping removed contaminants 50 times faster man with the conventional pump-and-
treat process. The cleanup, estimated to take 30 to 60 years with pump-and-treat, was completed in about one
year. As of 1996. following removal of more than 99% of the contaminant, and achievement of Maximum
Contaminant Limit (MCL) levels in groundwater for five of the six contaminants, the site is being passively
monitored under an agreement with  the California Regional Water  Quality Control Board (RWQCB),
California EPA's Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), and the Federal EPA Region 9. These
regulatory agencies declared that no further remedial action is required.

The initial objective of the LLNL DUS demonstration was to remove the separate phase gasoline from the
treatment area. Not only was the separate phase gasoline removed, but the groundwater contamination was
reduced to or near the regulatory limits. Thermal treatment under these conditions did not sterilize the site, and
instead led to the establishment of flourishing indigenous microbial ecosystems at soil temperatures up to 90
• C. The very positive response of regulators, who provided quick closure authorization for the site, indicates
that these methods will be accepted for use.

Visalia Pole Yard:

During the first six weeks of thermal remediation operations, between June and August 1997. approximately
300,000 pounds (135 metric tons) of contaminant was either removed or destroyed in place, a rate of about
46,000 pounds (22 metric tons) per week. That figure contrasts sharply with the 10 pounds (0.003 metric ton)
per week that Edison had been removing with conventional pump and treat cleanup methods. In fact, the
amount of hydrocarbons removed or destroyed in place in those  six weeks was equivalent to 600 years of
pump-and-treat, about 5,000 times the previous removal rate.

Edison achieved their initial goal of heating over 500,000 ydJ (380,000 m3) to at least a temperature of 100
°C by the beginning of August 1997. Uniform heating of both aquifer and aquitard materials was achieved.
At this point, about 20,000 gallons (76,000 L) of free-product liquid had been removed. Vapor and water
streams continued to be saturated with product. Continued destruction by HPO was indicated by high levels
of carbon dioxide (0.08 - 0.12% by volume) removed through vapor extraction. Initial destruction accounted
for about 300 Ib/day 136 kg/day) of contaminant being destroyed via HPO. Operations were changed to a huff
and puff mode, where steam is injected for about a week, and men injection ceases for about a week while
extraction continues. Maximum contaminant removal is obtained during this steam-off period as the formation
fluids flash to steam under an applied vacuum.

In September, 1997, following the initial contaminant removal by  steam injection and vacuum extraction, air
was injected along with the steam to enhance hydrous  pyrolysis of the remaining contaminant. In situ
destruction rates increased to about 800 Ib/day (360 kg/day). Recovery/destruction rates matched expectations.
By the summer of 1998, decreasing contaminant concentrations indicated that the bulk of the contaminant had
been removed from the main treatment volume. Groundwater concentrations indicated that the site was being
cleaned from the periphery inward, with all but two wells showing contaminant concentrations similar to the
pre-steam values by September 1998. Active thermal remediation of this zone was nearing completion. At this
point, Edison chose to begin injecting  steam into a deeper  aquifer  to heat and remove  the  remaining
contamination that had leaked into the overlying silty aquitard, which  represented the "floor" of the initial
treatment zone. Contaminant is being recovered from this aquitard today.

In the ensuing months, recovery rates have remained high. As of March 1999, over 960,000 Ib (440,000 kg)
or 116,000 gallons of contaminant had been removed or destroyed. About 18% of the total has been destroyed
in situ via HPO.  Contaminant concentrations in the recovery wells are decreasing.
                                             65

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)             September 1999

Edison plans to continue steam injection through the end of June 1999. This will be followed by groundwater
pumping, vacuum extraction and air injection to enhance HPO and bioremediation. Monitoring of groundwater
concentrations is expected to continue for a period of 2 to 5 years.

6. HEALTH AND SAFETY

This high-energy system needs to be handled in accordance with standard safety procedures. Monitoring of
air emissions has revealed low emissions with no worker safety or public health impacts.

7. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS

Permits were required for water discharge (treated effluent) and NOX emissions from the boilers. The site is
being remediated under a state-lead Remedial Action Plan (RAP). Vapor is destroyed in the boilers under air
permit from the regional air board. Standard regional groundwater monitoring is conducted to ensure public
health protection.

8. COSTS

DUS at the LLNL Gasoline Spill Site:

The first application of dynamic underground stripping at the Livermore gasoline spill site in 1993 cost about
$110 per cubic yard ($140 per cubic meter); removing the additional research and development costs suggested
the project could have been repeated for about $65 per cubic yard ($85 per cubic meter). The alternatives
would have been significantly higher. Because contamination at the gasoline spill at the Livermore site had
migrated downward over 130 ft (40 meters), digging up the contaminated soil and disposing of it would have
cost almost $300 per cubic yard ($400 per cubic meter). Soil removal and disposal costs are more typically in
the range of $100 to $200 per cubic yard ($130 to $260 per cubic meter); pump-and-treat method costs are as
high as or higher than soil removal costs.

DUS and HPO at the Visalia Pole Yard:

Use of DUS and HPO in combination can permit huge cost savings because HPO eliminates  the need for long-
term use of expensive pump and treat treatment facilities by converting some contaminants to benign products
in situ and mobilizing other contaminants. Site operators can adjust process time to enhance removal DUS or
in situ destruction through HPO. Because the treatment is simple, it can be readily applied to large volumes
of earth.

Edison has projected the life-cycle cost of steam remediation at the Visalia pole yard to be under $20 million,
which includes all construction, operation and monitoring activities. The total treatment zone includes about
800,000 yd3 (600.000 m3) of which about 400,000 yd3  (300,000 m3) contained DNAPL contamination.
Approximately $4.2 million was spent on capital engineering, design, construction, and startup. In addition,
about $12 million had  been spent  on operations,  maintenance,  energy (gas and electric), monitoring,
management, engineering support, and regulatory interface by the end of 1998. Since Edison (the site owner)
has acted as primary site operator for the  cleanup, the aforementioned project costs do not  reflect a profit in
the overhead costs. Post-steaming operations will consist of the operation of the water treatment system for
an expected  duration of two to five  years to demonstrate compliance with the  California State  EPA
Remediation Standards.  The  annual operations and maintenance costs for the water treatment plant is $1.2
million. The previously-approved cleanup plan of pump and treat with enhanced bioremediation was expected
to cost $45 million (in 1997 US  dollars) for the first 30 years;  it  was expected  to take over  120 years to
complete the cleanup.

The Visalia pole yard cleanup is the only commercial application of this method to date, but indications are
that large-scale cleanups with hydrous pyrolysis/oxidation may cost less than $25 per cubic yard ($33/mJ), an

                                             66

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)             September 1999

enormous savings over current methods. Perhaps the most attractive aspect of these technologies is that the
end product of a DUS/HPO cleanup with bioremediation as a final step is expected to be a truly clean site.

9. CONCLUSIONS

Breakthrough cleanups of seemingly intractable contaminants are now possible using a combined set of
thermal remediation and monitoring technologies. This "toolbox" of methods provides a rapid means to clean
up free organic liquids in the deep subsurface. Previously regarded as uncleanable, contamination of this type
can now be removed in a period of 1-2 years for a cost less than the many-decade site monitoring and pumping
methods it  replaces. The groundwater polishing by HPO provides the means to completely clean serious
NAPL-contaminated sites.

The gasoline spill demonstration clearly showed that thermal methods can quickly and effectively clean a
contaminated site.  With respect to the Visalia Pole Yard cleanup, tremendous removal rates have been
achieved. More than 970,000 Ib. of contaminants was removed or destroyed in about 20 months of operations;
previous recovery amounted to 10 Ib/week. Contaminant concentrations are dropping in the extraction wells;
the site is cleaning from the periphery inward. Site management plans to terminate active thermal treatment
soon, returning to pumping and monitoring the site. The expectations are that groundwater treatment will no
longer be necessary after a few years.

The Visalia field tests confirmed in situ HPO destruction in soil and ground water at rates similar to those
observed in the laboratory, under realistic field remediation conditions. HPO appears to work as fast as oxygen
can be supplied, at rates similar to those measured in the laboratory. The  predictive models used to design HPO
steam injection systems have been validated by using conservative tracers to confirm mixing rates, oxygen
consumption, CO2 release, and effects of real-world heterogeneity. Accurate field measurements of the critical
fluid parameters (destruction chemistry, oxygen content, steam front location) were demonstrated,  using
existing monitoring wells and portable data systems with minimal capital cost.

Several sites are designing DUS/HPO applications similar to Visalia.  These include both solvent and pole-
treating chemical contaminated sites, ranging in depth from relatively shallow (<40 ft (10 m)) to relatively deep
(>185 ft (56 m)). In January 1999, steam injection began at a relatively shallow (>35 ft (11 m)) site in Ohio
in which DNAPL TCE is being removed.

10. REFERENCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY

Aines, R.D.; Leif, F.; Knauss, K.; Newmark,  R.L.; Chiarappa, M.;  Davison, M.L.; Hudson, G.B., Weidner,
       R.; and Eaker, C.; Tracking inorganic carbon compounds to quantify in situ oxidation of polycyclic
       aromatic hydrocarbons during the Visalia Pole Yard hydrous pyrolysis/oxidation field test, 1998 (in
       prep).

Cummings, Mark A.; Visalia Steam Remediation Project: Case Study of an Integrated Approach to DNAPL
       Remediation. Los Alamos National Laboratory Report, LA-UR-9704999;  1997; 9pp.

Knauss, Kevin  G.; Aines, Roger D.; Dibley, Michael  J.; Leif, Roald N.;  Mew, Daniel  A.;  Hydrous
       Pyrolysis/Oxidation: In-Ground Thermal Destruction of Organic Contaminants. Lawrence Livermore
       National Laboratory, Report,  UCRL-JC 126636. 1997; 18pp.

Knauss, Kevin G.; Dibley, Michael J.; Leif, Roald N.; Mew, Daniel A.; Aines, Roger D. "Aqueous
       Oxidation of Trichloroethene (TCE): A Kinetic and Thermodynamic Analysis". In Physical,
       Chemical and Thermal Technologies, Remediation of Chlorinated and Recalcitrant Compounds,
       Proceeding of the First International Conference on Remediation of Chlorinated and Recalcitrant
       Compounds; Wickramanayake, G.B., Hinchee, R.E., Eds.; Battelle Press, Columbus, OH, 1998a;
                                             67

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)             September 1999

       pp359-364. Also available as Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Report. UCRL-JC-
       129932, 1998;8 pp.

Knauss, Kevin G.; Dibley, Michael J.; Leif, Roald N.; Mew. Daniel A.; Aines, Roger D. "Aqueous
       Oxidation of Trichloroethene (TCE): A Kinetic analysis." Accepted for Publication, Applied
       Geochemistry; 1998b.

Knauss, Kevin G.; Dibley, Michael J.; Leif, Roald N.; Mew, Daniel A.; Aines, Roger D. "'Aqueous
       Oxidation of Trichloroethene (TCE) and Tetrachloroethene (PCE) as a Function of Temperature
       and Calculated Thermodynainic Quantities, Submitted to Applied Geochemistry; 1998c.

Leif, Roald N.; Chiarrappa, Marina; Aines, Roger D.; Newmark Robin L.; and Knauss, Kevin G. "In Situ
       Hydrothermal Oxidative Destruction of DNAPLS in a Creosote Contaminated Site." In Physical.
       Chemical and Thermal Technologies, Remediation of Chlorinated and Recalcitrant Compounds,
       Proceeding of the First International Conference on Remediation of Chlorinated and Recalcitrant
       Compounds; Wickramanayake, G.B., Hinchee, R.E., Eds.; Battelle Press, Columbus, OH, 1998;
       pp 133-138. Also available as Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Report, UCRL-JC-
       129933, 1998a; 8 pp.

Leif, Roald N.; Knauss, Kevin G.; and Aines, Roger D.; Hydrothermal Oxidative Destruction of Creosote
       and Naphthalene, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Report, UCRL-JC, 1998b 21 pp (in
       prep).

Leif, Roald N.; Aines, Roger D.; Knauss, Kevin G. Hydrous Pyrolysis of Pole Treating Chemicals: A)
       Initial Measurement of Hydrous Pyrolysis Rates for Naphthalene and Pentachlorophenol; B)
       Solubility  of Flourene at Temperatures Up To 150°C; Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory,
       Report, UCRL-CR-129938, 1997a; 32pp.

Leif, Roald N.; Knauss, Kevin G.; Mew, Daniel A.; Aines, Roger D. Destruction of 2,2?,3-
       Trichlorobiphenyi in Aqueous Solution by Hydrous Pyrolysis / Oxidation (HPO). Lawrence
       Livermore National Laboratory, Report, UCRL-ID 129837, 1997b; 21 pp.

MSB Technology Applications, Inc., '"Dynamic Underground Stripping and Hydrous Pyrolysis/Oxidation Cost
       Analysis", report prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy, HMP-44, June, 1998.

Newmark, R.L., ed., Dynamic Underground Stripping Project: LLNL Gasoline Spill Demonstration Report
       ; Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Report UCRL -ID -116964, July, 1994 (1600 pages).

Newmark, Robin L.; Aines, Roger D.; Dumping Pump and Treat: Rapid Cleanups Using Thermal Technology.
       Lawrence  Livermore National Laboratory, Report, UCRL-JC 126637, 1997; 23 pp.

Newmark, R.L., R. D.  Aines, G.  B. Hudson, R. Leif, M. Chiarappa, C. Carrigan, J. Nitao, A. Elsholz, C.
    Eaker, R. Weidner and S. Sciarotta, In Situ destruction of contaminants via hydrous pyrolysis/oxidation:
    Visalia field test, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Report UCRL-ID-132671, 1998; 45 pp.

Newmark, R.L., R. D. Aines, G. B. Hudson, R. Leif, M. Chiarappa, C. Carrigan, J. Nitao, A. Elsholz, and C.
       Eaker, 1999. An integrated approach to monitoring a field test of in situ contaminant destruction,
       Symposium on the  Application of Geophysics to  Engineering and Environmental  Problems
       (SAGEEP) '99, Oakland, Ca., March 15-18, 1999. 527-540.

Ramirez,  A.L., W. D. Daily and R. L. Newmark, Electrical resistance  tomography for steam injection
        monitoring and process control, Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, (July,
        1995), v. 0,no.l,39-52.
                                            68

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)             September 1999

Udell, K and McCarter, R (1996) Treatability Tests of Steam Enhanced Extraction for the Removal of Wood
Treatment Chemicals from Visalia Pole Yard Soils. University of California. Report to Southern California
Edison, ()

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)
September 1999
Project No. 15
Phytoremediation of Chlorinated Solvents
Location
Aberdeen Proving Grounds Edgewood
Area J-Field Site, Edgewood, MD
Edward Sears Site.
New Gretna, NJ
Carswell Air Force Base,
Fort Worth, TX
Technical Contacts
Harry Compton (Aberdeen Site)
U.S. EPA, ERT(MSIOI)
2890 Woodbridge Avenue
Edison, NJ 08837-3679
Tel: 732-321-6751
Fax: 732-321-6724
E-mail: compton.harry@epa.gov
Steve Ffirsh (Aberdeen Site)
U.S. EPA, Region 3 (3HS50)
1650 Arch Street
Philadelphia, PA 19103-2029
Tel: 2 15-8 14-3352
E-mail: hirsh.steven@epa.gov
George Prince (Edward Sears Site)
U.S. EPA, ERT(MSIOI)
2890 Woodbridge Avenue
Edison, NJ 08837-3679
Tel: 732-321-6649
Fax: 732-321-6724
E-mail: prince.george@epa.gov
Greg Harvey (Carswell AFB Site)
U.S. Air Force, ASC/EMR
1801 10th Street- Area B
Wright Patterson AFB, OH
Tel: 937-255-7716 ext. 302
Fax: 937-255-4155
E-mail: Gregory.Harvey@wpafb.af.mil
Project Status
Interim Report





Project Dates
Accepted 1998

Costs Documented?
Yes (preliminary)























Media
Groundwater





Technology Type
Phytoremediation





Contaminants
Chlorinated solvents: TCE, 1122-TCA,
PCE, DCE
Project Size
Full-Scale Field
Demonstration






















Results Available?
Yes (preliminary)























1. INTRODUCTION

The efficacy and cost of phytoremediation with respect to the cleanup of shallow groundwater contaminated
with volatile organic compounds (VOCs), specifically chlorinated solvents, primarily trichloroethylene (TCE),
is being evaluated at the field scale in demonstration projects at Aberdeen Proving Grounds Edgewood Area
J-Field Site in Edgewood, Maryland, the Edward Sears site in New Gretna. New Jersey, and Carswell Air
Force Base in Fort Worth, Texas. These projects will demonstrate the use of hybrid poplars to hydraulically
control the sites and ultimately to remove the contaminants from the groundwater. The objective of this study
                                             70

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)             September 1999

will be to evaluate and compare the results for these three sites with respect to the efficacy of phytoremediation
under varied site conditions and in different climatic regions.

2. SITE DESCRIPTION

Aberdeen Proving Grounds, Maiyland
The site is located at the tip of the Gunpowder Neck Peninsula, which extends into the Chesapeake Bay. The
Army practiced open trench (Toxic Pits) burning/detonation of munitions containing chemical agents, dunnage
from the 1940s to the 1970s. Large quantities of decontaminating agents containing solvents were used during
the operation. The surficial groundwater table had been contaminated with solvents (1122-TCA, TCE, DCE)
at levels up to 260 parts per million (ppm). The contamination is 5-40 ft below ground surface. The plume is
slow moving due to soils  tight, silty sand. The  impacted  area is  a  floating mat-type fresh water marsh
approximately 500 ft southeast. The contaminant plume presents a low environmental threat.

Edward Sears Site, New Jersey
From the mid-1960s to the early 1990s, Edward Sears repackaged and sold expired paints, adhesives, paint
thinners, and various military surplus materials out of his backyard in New Gretna, NJ. As a result, toxic
materials were stored in leaky drums and containers on his property for many years. The soil and groundwater
were contaminated with numerous hazardous wastes, including methylene chloride, tetrachloroethylene, TCE,
trimethylbenzene, and xyiene. There is a highly permeable sand layer about 4-5 ft below ground surface (bgs),
but below mat exists a much less permeable layer of sand, silt, and clay from 5-18 ft bgs. This silt, sand, and
clay layer acts as a semiconfining unit for water and contaminants percolating down toward an unconfined
aquifer from 18-80 ft bgs. This unconfined aquifer is composed primarily of sand and is highly permeable. The
top of the aquifer is about 9 ft bgs, which lies in the less  permeable sand, silt, and clay layer. The top of the
aquifer is relatively shallow and most of the contamination is confined from 5-18 feet bgs. TCE concentrations
in the groundwater ranged from 0-390 ppb. Most of the TCE is concentrated in a small area on site.

CarswellAFB. Texas
The U.S.  Air Force Plant 4 (AFP4)  and  adjacent Naval Air Station, Fort Worth, Texas, has sustained
contamination in an alluvial aquifer through the use of chlorinated solvents in the manufacture  and assembly
of military aircraft. Dissolution and transport of TCE and its degradation products have occurred, creating a
plume of contaminated groundwater. This project is led by the U.S. Air Force (USAF) and is being conducted
as part of the Department of Defense's (DOD's) Environmental Security Technology Certification Program
(ESTCP), as well as the U.S.  Environmental Protection  Agency's (US EPA's) Superfund Innovative
Technology Evaluation (SHE) Program. Planting and cultivation of Eastern Cottonwood (Populus deltoides)
trees above a dissolved TCE plume in a shallow (<12  ft) aerobic aquifer took place in spring 1996. The trees
were planted as a short rotation woody crop employing standard techniques developed by the U.S. Department
of Energy (DOE) to grow biomass for energy and fiber. Data are being collected to determine the ability  of
the trees to perform as a natural pump-and-treat system.

3. DESCRIPTION  OF THE PROCESS

Aberdeen Proving Grounds, Maryland
•   After agronomic assessment, one acre plantation of two  year old Hybrid Poplar  510, were  planted 5-6 ft
    deep.  Surficial drainage system installed to remove precipitation quickly, allow trees to use groundwater.
•   1122-TCA and TCE are 90% of the contaminants (total approx. 260 ppm solvents). USGS estimated 7000
    gals/day removal would achieve hydraulic containment.
•   Planted in the spring of 1996. Duration of evaluation will be five years.
•   Various sampling methods were  employed during  the 1998 growing season  to determine if project
    objectives are being met. The methodologies that yielded the most valuable data include: groundwater
    sampling, sap flow  monitoring, tree transpiration gas and condensate  sampling and exposure pathway
    assessments. In addition to field sampling activities, new trees were planted on the site in October 1998
    to increase the phytoremediation area and assess the  usefulness of native species for phytoremediation.

                                             71

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)              September 1999

Edward Sears Site, New Jersey
•   118 hybrid poplar saplings (Populus charkowiiensis x incrassata, NE 308) were  planted in a plot
    approximately one-third of an acre in size. The trees were planted 10 ft apart on the axis running from
    north to south and 12.5 ft apart on the east-west axis. The trees were planted using a process called deep
    rooting: 12-ft trees were buried nine feet under the ground so mat only about 2-3 ft remained on the
    surface.
•   Extra poplars that were left after the deep rooting was completed were planted to a depth of 3 ft, or shallow
    rooted. These extra trees were planted along the boundary of the site to the north,  west, and east sides of
    the site. These trees will prevent rainwater infiltration from off-site.
•   Planted in December 1996.
•   Monitoring of the site includes  periodic sampling of groundwater, soils, soil  gas, plant tissue, and
    evapotranspiration gas.  Continued growth measurements will also be made as  the trees mature. Site
    maintenance also involves the prevention of deer and insect damage.

Carswell AFB, Texas
•   The USAF planted 660 eastern cottonwoods in a one acre area. The species P. deltoides was chosen over
    a hybridized species of poplar because it is indigenous to the region and has therefore proven its ability
    to withstand the Texas climate, local pathogens, and other localized variables that  may affect tree growth
    and health.
•   Two sizes of trees were planted: whips and 5-gallon buckets. The 5-gallon bucket trees are expected to
    have higher evapotranspiration rates due to their larger leaf mass.
•   Planted in April 1996 (5-gallon buckets have grown faster than whips).
•   Site managers plan to increase monitoring at the site to include a whole suite of water, soil, air, and tree
    tissue sample analysis. Some of the more unique data they are collecting (in relation to the  other case study
    sites) are  analyses of microbial populations and assays of TCE degrading enzymes in the trees.

4. RESULTS AND EVALUATION

Aberdeen Proving Grounds, Maryland
•   Groundwater samples and elevations were collected seasonally from the on-site wells to determine VOC
    concentrations and if trees were facilitating hydraulic containment of the plume. Results indicate that an
    area of drawdown exists within the tree zone during the spring and summer when tree transpiration is the
    greatest.  In  1998, additional  wells were installed using a Geoprobe in order to more accurately assess
    VOC concentrations and groundwater elevation. A groundwater model is currently being developed to
    predict potential VOC removal by the trees and when complete hydraulic containment may be attained.
    Given the success of the groundwater sampling, sampling objectives for 1999 include groundwater
    elevation monitoring and sampling and a continued effort to refine the groundwater model.
•   Currently using sap flow instrumentation, during growing season trees are pumping approximately 1,500-
    2,000 gals/day with demonstrated aquifer drawdown. There are measurable parent compounds in the
    transpiration gas of leaves. OP-FTIR demonstrated non-detectable off-site migration of emissions from
    transpiration gas. Limitations include depth of contamination, but not concentrations of up to 260 ppm
    solvents. Weather and growing season are the most influential factors.
•   Sap flow monitoring was performed to determine the amount of water being removed by individual trees.
    In order to increase monitoring accuracy, new sap flow probes were purchased which are placed directly
    into the tree tissue as opposed to resting on the trunk of the tree.  Comparison of new equipment with
    previous methods indicates that the new methodology provides an even more accurate estimation of net
    transpiration rate with less data interference or Anoise@. Future sampling objectives for the site include
    continued seasonal sap flow monitoring for the purposes of estimating transpiration rates.
•   Seasonal tree transpiration gas and condensate sampling continued in the 1998 sampling  season to assess
    the release of VOCs from the trees. Previous methods consisted of placing a 100  liter Tedlar bag over a
    section of branch and then sampling the gas and any condensate trapped within the bag. This method was
    modified  in 1998 with the addition of a cold trap, which would potentially remove excess moisture from
    the bag and keep the leaves in a more ambient temperature. Comparison of the two methods, with and

                                             72

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)             September 1999

    without cold trap, indicate that the cold trap apparatus may not be powerful enough to sufficiently cool
    the temperature within the bag. Future transpiration gas monitoring is planned for the 1999 sampling
    season with the addition of a modified cold trap attachment.
•   Several studies were designed which examined exposure pathways. Leaves and soil were collected from
    the phytoremediation area and a reference area for a leaf degradation study.  The study is designed to
    determine whether or not mere are deleterious compounds retained within the study leaves or within the
    associated soil, which could pose risk to an environmental receptor.  The results of this study are still being
    analyzed. Additional studies involved nematode analyses, which examined the trophic assemblage of the
    nematode community.  Data collected in 1997 indicated that the nematode community was enhanced in
    the phytoremediation area as compared with data collected prior to the tree planting.
•   New  trees  were planted  in  the 1998  sampling  season.  The objectives  were:l)  to  assess  the
    phytoremediation capabilities of native Maryland  species, tulip trees and silver maples, in addition to
    hybrid poplar trees; 2) to increase the area of hydraulic containment; 3) to diversify the age of trees to
    ensure continued containment and contaminant removal and 4) to assess new planting methods. Objective
    number four relates to the three tree excavations performed in the fall of 1998. Three trees were excavated
    and replanted in their same areas on the site to examine root depth and structure and whether or not the
    trees were utilizing groundwater. Examinations revealed that most tree roots appeared to be confined to
    the hole in which they were placed and did not appear to radiate extensively from this area. It did appear
    however, that the tree roots were deep enough to access the groundwater.  Three new planting methods
    (i.e. hole  sizes and widths) were employed for the new trees in an  attempt to provide the tree roots with
    either increased depth, increased width or a combination of increased width and depth. Future monitoring
    of these new trees is planned for the 1999 sampling season in an attempt to discern the phytoremediation
    capabilities of the native species versus the hybrid poplars and to assess the growth of the new trees given
    the various planting methods employed for each.

Edward Sears Site, New Jersey
•   At eight of eleven groundwater sample locations, total VOC levels were lower in  1998 when compared
    to  1997 total  VOC levels  at these locations.  Order of magnitude reductions  in DCE and TCE
    concentrations were evident at several groundwater sample locations.
•   Concentrations of VOC in soil gas and flux samples were negligible. Probably due to the silt/clay lens at
    5 feet bgs. These measurements will be discontinued in favor of groundwater monitoring.
•   Over 40 direct push, microwells were installed to monitor groundwater in lieu of temporary direct push
    wells.  This will enable more frequent, seasonal monitoring of ground water, at  specific locations for
    comparable costs.
•   Sampling of evapotranspiration gas was conducted by  placing Tedlar bags over entire trees. Toluene,
    xylene, 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene, and dichloromethane were  detected in  low ppb/v levels  in some
    transpiration gas samples. PCE and TCE were  not detected.
•   Tree height and diameter were adversely affected by high concentrations of VOCs in groundwater.  Trees
    averaged  about 5 foot growth for the 1998 season. Some trees in the clean areas  grew up to 10 feet in
    1998.
•   Over a three day period in August 1998, daily sap flow ranged from 70 - 200 gallons/day when applied
    to the 118 deep planted poplar trees. Water removal by shallow planted trees was not estimated.

CarswellAFB. Texas
•   Seventeen months after planting, tree roots had reached the water table (10 feet bgs).
•   Transpiration measurements indicate mat the largest planted trees transpired approximately 3.75 gpd
    during summer 1997; a nearby 19-year-old,  70-ft cottonwood tree growing  southeast of the area was
    determined  to transpire approximately 350 gpd.  Studies of the influence of other large trees on  the
    geochemistry of the groundwater in the immediate area of the site indicates that other large trees can alter
    the chemistry of the groundwater.
•   Reduction of dissolved oxygen (DO) is the primary microbial process in the groundwater beneath the
    planted trees.   Two years  after  planting, the chemistry of the shallow aquifer  is changing  - DO
    concentrations are decreasing and total iron is increasing.

                                             73

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)              September 1999

•   Decaying root tissue and root exudates containing hydrophilic acids are possible sources of labile organic
    carbon that can be used by microbes to produce anaerobic conditions in groundwater that are conducive
    to reductive dechlorination.
•   The distribution of PCE and TCE transformation products suggest that the highest reducing activity is
    present in the roots and the highest oxidizing activity is in the leaves.  No evidence has been found to
    indicate that PCE or TCE are accumulated in the leaves.
•   Groundwater was sampled in July 1997, November 1997, February 1998. and June 1998. Analyses from
    theses samples indicate mat tree roots have the potential to create anaerobic conditions in the groundwater
    that will facilitate degradation  of TCE by microbially mediated reductive dechlorination.   TCE
    concentrations in groundwater samples collected beneath the 19-year-old cottonwood tree during summer
    1997 were about 80 percent less than  concentrations in groundwater beneath the planted trees, and
    concentrations of a TCE degradation by-product (cis-l,2-dichloroethylene) were about 100 percent greater.
•   Results of a groundwater flow model (MODFLOW) and a transpiration model (PROSPER) will be
    combined to determine when hydraulic control of the plume might occur. A solute-transport model
    (MOC3D) is planned to help determine the  relative importance of various attenuation processes in the
    aquifer to guide data collection at future sites. USGS review of several synoptic rounds of water level
    measurements at the site revealed mat hydraulic effects on the water table were first observed in the June
    1998 data set. Transpiration results from the 1998 growing season were added to the simulation to
    detennine the site wide hydraulic effects of the planted trees.  The model results indicate that there was
    enough transpiration during  1998 to create a drawdown cone on the water table. The field data show the
    center of the drawdown cone is between the tree stands, which would be expected if one thinks of the
    principle  of superposition. Both the field data and model results indicate that the drawdown cone extends
    slightly beyond the wells in the upgradient control well.  This could explain why some diurnal fluctuation
    of water levels could be observed during the 1998 growing season.

5. COSTS

Aberdeen Proving Grounds, Maryland
    Before treatment C $5,000
        Capital C $80,000 for UXO clearance of soil during planting; $80/tree.
        Operation and maintenance C $30,000, due to no established monitoring techniques
    After treatment C None (trees remain in place)

Edward Sears Site, New Jersey
    Treatment:
        Site Preparation $24,000
        Planting        $65,700
        Maintenance    $15,300
           Total = $105,000
    1997 maintenance: $26,000
    1998 maintenance: $14,000*
    * Expect maintenance to drop substantially after trees are established

Monitoring/analysis:  50 ground water stations, soil  gas, soils, hydrogeological  parameters,  weather,
transpiration gas, reports, etc.  Monitoring costs should also reduce annually as  study techniques become more
refined.
        1997: $72,800
        1998: $61,600
                                             74

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)              September 1999

CarswellAFB, Texas
    Before Treatment
       Preparatory! Work
           Site Characterization C $12,000
           Site Design C$10,000
       Site Work
       Monitoring (research level) well installation C $90,000
           Development of Plantations - 1 acre (includes landscaping costs) C $41,000
           Weather Station C$3,100
           Survey C $25,000
       Purchase of Trees
           Whips ($0.20 each) C$100
           Five-gallon buckets ($18 each) C $2,000

    Treatment
       Installation of Irrigation System C $10,000
       Yearly O&M:
           Landscaping C $2,000
               Groundwater, soil, vegetation, transpiration, climate, soil moisture, and water-level monitoring
               (research level) C $250,000

The planting costs at Carswell are significantly less than  proprietary planting techniques employed by the
vendors that involve auguring down to the capillary fringe and other engineered methods for individual tree
planting.

    After Treatment C None
                                              75

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)
September 1999
Project No. 16
In-Situ Heavy Metal Bioprecipitation
Location
Industrial site in Belgium
Technical Contact
Dr. Ludo Diels
Dr. Leen Bastiaens
Flemish Institute for
Technological Research
(Vito)
Boeretang 200
B-2400 Mol
Belgium
Tel +32 143351 00
Fax +32 14 58 05 23
Project Status
New
Project Dates
Accepted 1999
Final report 2002
Costs Documented?
No
Media
Groundwater
Contaminants
Heavy metals (zinc,
cadmium, arsenic, lead,
chromium, nickel,
copper)
Sulfate
Project Size
Laboratory,
pilot/full scale
Technology Type
In-situ
bioremediation
(reactive zone or
biobarrier)

Results Available?
Not Yet
1. INTRODUCTION

The industrial world is facing many problems conceming soils and groundwater with heavy metal pollution.
This pollution is mainly due to mining activities and non-ferrous activities by e.a. the metal refining, metal
processing, and surface treatment industries. Immobilization followed by phytostabilization has been shown
to be effective for treating polluted soil in order to reduce the risk of heavy metals being spread around by wind
erosion or leaching from the soil into the groundwater (Van der Lelie et al., 1998). But what about groundwater
that has already been contaminated with heavy metals?

When dealing with dissolved inorganic contaminants, such as heavy metals, the required process sequence in
a 'pump & treat' system to remove the dissolved heavy metals present in the groundwater becomes very
complex and costly. In addition, the disposal of the metallic sludge, in most cases as a hazardous waste, is also
very cost prohibitive. Therefore, in  situ treatment methods capable of achieving the same mass removal
reactions for dissolved contaminants in an in situ environment are evolving and gradually gaining prominence
in the remediation industry.

In this project a relatively innovative technique will be studied for in situ treatment of groundwater containing
heavy metals. Through stimulation of sulfate reducing bacteria (SRBs) in aquifers and groundwater heavy
metals can be bioprecipitated, hereby reducing the risk of further spreading of the metals. The feasibility of
this technique will be evaluated for 2 different industrial sites in Belgium. In-situ bioprecipitation of heavy
metals can be implemented as a biological reactive zone or biowall. The concept of in situ reactive zones is
based on the  creation of a  subsurface zone where migrating contaminants are intercepted and permanently
immobilized into harmless end products.

2. SITE DESCRIPTION

On industrial site 1 (metal  smelter) high concentrations of zinc (10-150 mg/1), cadmium (0.4-4 mg/1) and
arsenic (20-270 (.ig/1) are present in the groundwater. Also relatively high concentration of sulfate (400-700
mg/1) was measured,  which is favorable for SRB-activities.
                                              76

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)              September 1999

Industrial site 2 (surface treatment) has serious chromium (up to 8300 (.ig/1), zinc (up to 78 mg/1), lead (up to
72 (ig/1). nickel (up to 3500 (ig/1), copper (92 mg/1) and cadmium (up to 17 mg/1) problems in the groundwater.
Very high sulfate (up to 3000 mg/1) concentrations are also present.

3. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROCESS

Bioprecipitation process:
In-situ precipitation of heavy metals and sulfates is a method based on stimulation of SRBs by supplementing
an appropriate electron donor. Addition of extra nutrients (N and P) might also be required for good growth
of the bacteria. In the presence of a suitable electron donor (for instance acetate) SRBs reduce sulfates to
sulfites and further to sulfides, which then form stable and rather insoluble metalsulfides:

                            CH,COOH + SO42 ==> 2 HCO, + HS + if

                                   H2S + Me^ ==> MeS + 2 if

A good in situ bioprecipitation process however can only be obtained under the following conditions:

•   Sulfate reducing bacteria (SRBs) must be present in the aquifer. In case no SRBs are present among the
    autochthonous micro-population in the aquifer, appropriate microorganisms have to be introduced in the
    aquifer.
•   Sulfate should be available.
•   Also nutrients and an appropriate  electron donor such as methanol, ethanol, molasses, acetate or lactate
    are required.
•   No oxygen should be present and  a low redox potential (Eh) is necessary.

The applicability of in-situ bioprecipitation of heavy metals on sites should therefor be evaluated case by case.

Outline of the project:
•   Preliminary study
•   Site evaluation
•   Lab-scale treatability testing in batch and column experiments
•   The presence of SRBs  in the aquifers will be examined by microbial countings, measurements of SRB-
    activity and PCR-teclinology.
•   Selection of a suitable organic substrate
•   Determination of optimal physico-chemical conditions: required concentration of the electron  donor,
    nutrients requirement, sulfate requirements, influence of temperature, ...
•   As the effectiveness of a reactive zone is determined largely by the relationship between the kinetics of
    the target reactions and the rate at which the mass flux of contaminants passes through it with the moving
    groundwater, kinetics of metal removal from groundwater will be examined.
•   The stability of the formed metalsulfides will be checked.
•   Further is clogging due to biomass production and metal precipitates an important issue that has to be
    evaluated.
•   Field demo on pilot of rull scale.
•   Monitoring
                                             77

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)             September 1999

4. RESULTS/COSTS

Results of this new project will be available the following years.

5. REFERENCES

Corbisier, P. Thiry E., Masolijn A. and Diels L. (1994) Construction and development of metal ion biosensors.
In Campbell A.K.. Cricka L.J., Stanley P.E. eds. Bioluminescence and Chemoluminescence : Fundamentals
and Applied Aspects. Chichester, New York, Brisbane. Toronto. Singapore. John Wiley and Sons pp!50-155.

Corbisier, P., Tliiry, E., Diels, L.(1996) Bacterial biosensors for the toxicity assessment of solid wastes,
Environmental Toxicology and Water Quality: an international Journal. 11, 171-177.

Diels, L., Dong, Q., van der Lelie, D. Baeyens, W., Mergeay, M.  (1995) The  czc operon of Alcaligenes
eutrophus CH34: from resistance mechanism to the removal of heavy metal. J. Ind. Microbiol. 14, 142-153.

Diels, L. (1997) Heavy metal bioremediation of soil in methods in  Biotechnology, Vol. 2: Bioremediation
Protocols, edited by O. Sheehan Humana Press Inc. Totowa. NJ.

Diels, L. (1990) Accumulation and precipitation of Cd and Zn ions by Alcaligenes eutrophus CH34 strains,
in Biohydrometallurgy (Salley, J., McCready, R.G.L., and Wichlacs, P.Z., eds.), CANMET SP89-10, 369-377.

Mergeay, M. 1997. Microbial resources for bioremediation of sites polluted by heavy metals. In perspectives
in Bioremediation p. 65-73 Ed. J.R. Wildcet al. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Nederlands.

Van derlelie, D., L. Diels, J. Vangronsveld, H. Clysters.  1998. De metaalwoestijn  herleeft. Het ingenieursblad
11/12.
                                             78

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)
September 1999
Project No. 17
GERBER Site
Location
SERMAISE - Department of
ESSONNE - ILE DE
FRANCE Region
Technical Contact
Rene Goubier
ADEME
BP406
49004 ANGERS CEDEX 01 -
France
Project Status
New Project
Project Dates
06/1999
07 /2002
Media
Soil and groundwater
Technology Type
Excavation and
treatment of waste
Contaminants
Complex contamination: solvents = BTEX -
chlorinated; PCB; phenols, phthalates: Pb. Zn
Project Size
Full scale
1. INTRODUCTION

The GERBER site was operated since the beginning of the fifties until 1993 as a solvent regeneration plant.
Until 1972, one or two lagoons have been used to dumps residues of the activities. In 1972-1973, an unknown
but very important quantity of drums were buried on the site. In 1983, the pollution of the drinking water well
of the village of SERMAISE by chlorinated organics was attributed to the GERBER site located in the vicinity
and a first preliminary investigation revealed buried drums with organic and chlorinated material.

Nothing happened during the following years because the polluter didn't have the financial capability to carry
out significant depollution action. In 1992, in connection with the new legal and financial system created to
deal with « orphan » site a first clean up project was carried  out by ADEME. The project consisted in the
excavation of the main part of the buried drum area: 3700 drums were excavated and treated and 14,000 tons
of polluted soil was confined on the site. The treatment of this polluted soil is carried out at the present time
by solvent washing. The total cost of these first phases of clean up is about 65 millions francs.

2. THE NEW PROJECT

In addition to the first phase rehabilitation works presented above, it was clear that the remaining part of the
site was still heavily polluted with not so much drums but with buried waste corresponding to the ancient
lagoons and associated polluted soil and groundwater. Therefore an impact and risk assessment study was
earned out in 1998 that characterized the remaining pollution:

      •   high concentrations of pollutants still cover 70% of the site
      •   highly contaminated soil was found to a depth of approximately 4-5 m
      •   total volume of polluted soil is estimated 50-75,000 m\

The impact study and modeling showed that the migration of the pollutants in the groundwater seems to be
limited and that a two stages natural attenuation occurs: aerobic degradation of BTEX and then reductive
dechlorination of chlorinated solvents. Based on these  first results it was decided to prepare a new phase of
evaluation and corrective action. The objectives of this new phase will be:

      •   to improve the knowledge of the contamination source and to prepare the clean up of the remaining
          hot spots
      •   to complete the evaluation of the transfer of the pollution in the air and in the groundwater with a
          detailed characterization of the mechanisms of the natural attenuation. Then, after this assessment
          of the efficiency and limits of the process of natural attenuation an additional project of in  situ
                                             79

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)             September 1999

         source reduction will be studied in order to have finally a restoration system able to reduce the risks
         to acceptable levels.

Reference - Definition of corrective actions talcing into account natural attenuation and risk assessment
approach, former Etablissement Chimique du Hurepoix Site in SERMAISE -France - NATO CCMS meeting
ANGERS May 1999.

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)
September 1999
Project No. 18
SAFIRA
Location
Bitterfeld, Germany
Technical Contact
Dr. Holger Weiss
UFZ-Centre for Environmental
Research
Permoserstrasse 15
D-043 18 Leipzig
Germany
Project Status
New project
Project Dates
7/1999 - 6/2002
Costs Documented?
Yes
Contaminants
Complex
contamination.
chlorobenzene
Technology Type
9 different types of
biotic and abiotic
technologies
Media
groundwater
Project Size
Pilot Scale
Results Available?
Not yet
1. INTRODUCTION

The  aim of the SAFIRA project is the examination and further development of in situ groundwater
decontamination technologies. A site near Bitterfeld (Germany) was selected as a model location. Different
types of technologies (e.g. catalytic, microbial, sorption) have to prove their performance and long term
stability under the real-world conditions of an in situ pilot plant. It is a cooperation project between UFZ
Center for Environmental Research Leipzig-Halle, TNO (The Netherlands) and the universities Dresden, Halle,
Kiel. Leipzig, and Tuebingen.

2. BACKGROUND

The  region of Bitterfeld was selected as the model location for investigations into developing powerful in situ
technologies for the remediation of complexly contaminated groundwater. The soil and water environmental
compartments in the Bitterfeld/Wolfen district have suffered sustained damage as a result of over a century
of lignite-mining and chemical  industry. Whereas relevant soil pollution is mainly confined to industrial
locations (plant sites) and landfills, the persistent penetration of the groundwater by pollutants has resulted in
contamination attaining a regional scale. Consequently, an area of about 25 km2 with an estimated volume of
some 200 million m* is now partly highly polluted and must be  regarded as an independent  source of
contamination.  This pollution is characterised by the extensive distribution of halogenised hydrocarbons,
especially chlorinated aliphatics and chlorinated aromatics.

3. TECHNICAL CONCEPT

Technology developed and tested in laboratories will be scaled up in two stages: a mobile test unit and an in
situ pilot plant. A mobile decontamination unit has been designed for this purpose as a  "window in the
aquifer". Groundwater from a depth of about 20 m is pumped into a storage tank without coming into contact
with oxygen. This polluted  water will then be used to charge five possible test columns with the physico-
chemical conditions of the aquifer being preserved.

The methods tested successfully in the laboratory and in the mobile decontamination unit have to prove their
chemical and hydrological long-term stability and will be optimised in a pilot plant. Five shafts with a depth
of about 22.5 m and an inner diameter of 3 m were constructed. Several experimental columns of up to 1.4 m
in diameter will be installed into these shafts and will be supplied with the contaminated groundwater directly
from the aquifer. The contaminated water will vertically flow through the reactors and will  be cleaned.
Numerous sampling and process controlling facilities as well as a variable design of the reaction columns will
enable the  analyses  of relevant chemical and hydraulic  processes  during operation and  competitive
development in technology under real-world conditions. The technologies tested in the first phase of the pilot
plant are:
                                              81

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)             September 1999

•  anaerobic microbial degradation of the contaminants
•  aerobic microbial degradation
•  electrocatalytical dehalogenation
•  zeolith supported catalysts
•  oxidizing catalysts
•  sorption barriers
•  redox reactors
•  microbial degradation in combination of adsorption onto several high porosity media
•  bioscreens

The  assessment of the  different techniques will  follow chemical,  ecotoxicological,  economic and
environmental criteria.

4. ANALYTICAL APPROACH

A weekly sampling of the inflow and outflow of every reactor will occur. All samples will be analyzed in the
laboratory at the site.  Regular analyses will include  a GC analyses (TCE,  DCE, dichlorobenzene,
chlorobenzene, benzene), ion-chromatography (chloride, sulfate, phosphate, nitrate). TOC, and AOX.
Additional samplings and  analysis of water and solid material are optional.

5. RESULTS

First results of the experiments in the laboratory and in the mobile test unit are summarized in reports (see
references).

6. HEALTH AND SAFETY

The shafts will ventilated before the staff enter the shafts for sampling. The German regulations for safety have
to be followed. The shafts are  equipped with warning systems for fire, gas, water, pressure in the reactors,
temperature, air quality7 and controlling the pumps. Most of this equipment is only be necessary for research
purpose.

7. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS

The outflow water of the  different reactors is cleaned additionally in a cleaning facility. This option was
necessary only for the pilot plant to demonstrate the technologies and to  avoid environmental impact. The
hydrologic regime is not disturbed. Monitoring wells are installed around the shafts.

8. COSTS

Not yet available.

9. CONCLUSIONS

Not yet available.
                                             82

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)             September 1999

10. REFERENCES

Weiss H., Teutsch G., Daus  B. (ed.)(1997): Sanierungsforschung in regional kontaminierten Aquiferen
      (SAFIRA) - Bericht zur Machbarkeitsstudie fur den Modellstandort Bitterfeld.-UFZ-Bericht 27/1997,
      Leipzig

Weiss H., Daus B., Fritz P., Kopinke, F.-D., Popp, P. & Wlinsche, L. (1998): In situ groundwater remediation
      research in the Bitterfeld region in eastern Germany (SAFIRA); In: M. Herbert & K. Kovar (Ed.):
      Groundwater Quality: Remediation and Protection.- IAHS Publication no. 250, 443-450.
                                            83

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)
September 1999
Project No. 19
Successive Extraction - Decontamination of Leather Tanning Waste De
University:
University of Istanbul
Contact Person:
Dr. Erol Ercag
University of Istanbul
Faculty of Engineering.
Department of Chemistry,
Avcilar, 34850
Istanbul. TURKEY
Tel: 02 12 591 1998 Ext. 190
Fax: 0212 591 1997
Ercag@istanbul.edu.tr
Report:
Accepted 1998
Final Report 2000
Costs Documented:
None




Report Status:
Interim
Results Available:
None




posited Soil
Project Type:
Laboratory/field
Conclusions:
None




1. INTRODUCTION

Since old leather tanning industries have been moved from a central region to the outskirts of Istanbul, namely,
from Zeytinbumu to Tuzla of Istanbul, considerable land into which the tanning wastes were dumped over
years are now waiting to be reused. Now the Greater City Municipality of Istanbul is considering this emptied
region for recreational  and housing purposes. This region now poses considerable health hazard for the
potential future users of this land.

2. AIM

This project was purported to perform the treatability study of the contaminated soil at Zeytinbumu.

3. METHOD

Sampling of  soil  over the abandoned tanning industrial area will  be made, and the organic + inorganic
contaminants in the  soil  will be analysed. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) will  be analysed  by a
Photolonasation Detector capable of detecting 250+ chemicals.

According to the types  of organic (e.g., additives and modification  agents) and inorganic (e.g., chromium,
sulfide etc.) constituents present as contaminants, a treatability study of soil consisting of organic extraction
with suitable solvent (e.g. methylene chloride) followed by acid leaching of toxic heavy metals will be carried
out. Both synthetic and  real soil samples will be investigated to disclose major constitutents of contaminants
and men an optimization study will be carried out to optimize solvent, acid, leachant concentration, solids-to-
liquid ratio and so on.

Currently, points from which soil samples are to be taken have already been determined. Several samples are
to be taken from the same point according to the distance to the surface. Depth from which samples are
planned to be taken will be roughly 1 meter at maximum. At the same sampling positions, VOC measurements
will also be made.

4. RESULTS

Not available.
                                              84

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)             September 1999




5. COSTS, HEALTH AND SAFETY




Not available.




6. CONCLUSIONS




Insufficient data to draw any meaningful conclusions.




7. REFERENCES




Not applicable.

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)
September 1999
Project No. 20
Interagency DNAPL Consortium Side-by-Side Technology
Demonstrations at Cape Canaveral, FL
Location
Cape Canaveral, FL,
USA
Technical Contact
Tom Early
Oak Ridge National
Laboratory
P.O. Box 2008
Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6038
Tel: 423/576-2103
Fax: 423/574-7420
Project Status
Nomination
Project Dates
1998-2000
Costs Documented?
TBD
Contaminants
DNAPL
Technology Type
3 Technologies
Side-by-Side
Media
Soil and Ground Water
Project Size
2 Acres
Results Available?
TBD
1. INTRODUCTION

An  important step in reducing technology risk and increasing user and regulatory acceptance of DNAPL
remediation, characterization and monitoring technologies involves conducting concurrent, "side-by-side" field
demonstrations. These side-by-side"' demonstrations result in comparative cost and performance data collected
under the same field conditions. Through appropriate documentation, the resulting cost and performance data
can be evaluated for site-specific applications. Side-by-side demonstrations help to fill an important "gap" in
the  process of technology development and deployment and will accelerate technology privatization.

2. BACKGROUND

Dense non-aqueous phase liquids (DNAPLs) pose serious, long-term ground water contamination problems
due to their toxicity; limited solubility in ground water; and significant migration potential in soil gas, ground
water, and/or as separate phase liquids. DNAPL chemicals, particularly chlorinated solvents, are among the
most common of environmental contamination problems in the United States as well as for most industrialized
countries.  There are thousands of DNAPL-contaminated sites in the United  States, often at contaminant
volumes that are difficult to detect, but in quantities that can represent significant sources of ground water
contamination. Many agency and private-sector sites have DNAPL contamination problems, including federal,
state,  and  local government agencies. The Office of Management and Budget estimates that the federal
government alone will spend billions of dollars for environmental  clean up of DNAPL  contamination
problems.

While various DNAPL remediation, characterization and monitoring technologies have been demonstrated in
the past, it is difficult, if not impossible, to make meaningful comparisons of either performance or cost among
these technologies because of the variable conditions at the demonstration sites. As a result, "problem holders"
and regulatory officials have been reluctant to deploy these technologies for site clean up. In order to expedite
the regulatory acceptance and use of these innovative remedial technologies, comparative cost and performance
data must be collected.

3. TECHNICAL CONCEPT

In 1998, a multiagency consortium was organized by the United States Department of Energy/Office of
Environmental Management  (DOE/EM) and the Department of Defense  (DOD) through  the Air Force
Research Laboratory  (AFRL) in cooperation with the 45th space wing, the National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA) and the  United States Environmental Protection  Agency (EPA) to demonstrate
innovative  DNAPL remediation and characterization technologies at a NASA remediation site on Cape
Canaveral Air Station, Cape Canaveral, FL. This Interagency DNAPL Consortium (IDC) was formed to:
                                             86

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)              September 1999


•   address a serous, wide-spread and shared environmental problem adversely affecting many U.S. federal
    agencies (e.g., DOE. EPA. DOD, NASA, Department of Interior, Department of Agriculture);

•   cost-share the demonstration and comparison of these remediation and monitoring system technologies;

•   accelerate both the demonstration and  deployment of DNAPL  remediation,  characterization  and
    monitoring technologies for the purpose of reducing the perceived technology risk associated with these
    technologies;

•   increase regulatory and user acceptance of these technologies by providing documented, cost  and
    performance data; and

•   provide increased opportunities to test new sensors designed to support in situ remediation of DNAPL
    contamination problems in addition to ex situ treatment and disposal.

In order to conduct this side-by-side demonstration, an IDC Core Management Team was organized. The IDC
consists of representatives from DOE, NASA, USAF, DOD, and EPA. The Team is a collaborative decision-
making body that draws upon the strengths of each agency to solve problems associated with the project. The
Team utilizes a Technical Advisory Group (TAG) for support in making decisions that concern individual
evaluation of remediation systems. The IDC TAG is comprised of experts from industry, academia and federal
agencies. With the support of the TAG, the Team selected  three of the  most promising remediation
technologies for deployment and evaluation at Launch Complex 34.

4. ANALYTICAL APPROACH

In situ oxidation using potassium permanganate is a potentially fast and low cost solution for the destruction
of chlorinated etliylenes (TCE, PCE, etc), BTEX (benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene) and simple
polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. In particular, potassium permanganate reacts effectively with the double
bonds in chlorinated ethylenes such as trichloroethylene, perchloroethylene, dichloroethylene isomers, and
vinyl chloride. It is effective for the remediation of DNAPL, absorbed phase and dissolved phase contaminants
and produces innocuous breakdown products such as carbon dioxide, chloride ions and manganese dioxide.
The permanganate solution typically is applied at concentrations of one to three percent solution via injection
wells. This solution is easily handled, mixed and injected and is non-toxic and non-hazardous.

Bench scale laboratory tests of potassium permanganate with trichloroethylene have resulted in up to a 90%
reduction  of trichloroethylene in four hours of treatment. The  effectiveness  of the  in situ injection of
permanganate is a function of the reaction kinetics, the transport and contact between potassium permanganate
and the contaminant,  as well as  competitive reactions with other oxidizable  species (e.g., iron, natural
organics).  The effective use of this remedial technology requires an engineered approach for maximizing the
contact between potassium  permanganate and the target contaminant. As with many technologies,  low
permeability and heterogeneity of soils present a challenge and require a carefully designed application system.

Benefits

•   Chemically oxidizes a wide range of organic compounds to innocuous end-products over a wide pH range

•   Visible (purple) solution makes it easy to track the injection influence or the degree of treatment

•   Chemically stable in water (very  slow auto-degradation)-stays in solution until it is reacted

•   No off-gas treatment required
                                             87

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)              September 1999

Six Phase Soil Heating

The Six Phase Soil Heating technology removes contaminants from soil and ground water by passing an
electrical current through the soil matrix. The passage of current generates heat due to electrical resistance
within the soil. This is the same process used in any electrically heated device (e.g.. clothes iron, heater, stove).
Heat is generated throughout the soil in the remediation area and the temperature of the soil is increased to the
boiling point of water. Soil moisture becomes steam that is captured by vapor recovery wells for removal. Soil
contaminants are vaporized concurrently and  are captured for ex situ treatment.

Benefits

•   Heat is generated uniformly throughout the treatment volume. While low permeability lenses reduce the
    performance of other technologies that rely on the vertical movement of a fluid or vapor though the soil
    matrix, soil heterogeneity or low permeability does not adversely effect Six Phase Soil Heating. In fact,
    low permeability soils tend to carry greater current than do sandy soils, thus, become hotter, and boil
    constituents faster.

•   Anaerobic dechlorination of solvents will  add conductive chloride ions to "hot spots", likewise attracting
    current for faster remediation of the impacted regions of the site.

•   The boiling of soil moisture in clay lenses forms steam to "sweep out" volatile organic compounds. This
    steam stripping process effectively increases the permeability clay soils.

•   Because Six Phase Soil Heating treats all soils in the treatment volume, there are no untreated regions from
    which contaminants could diffuse later and cause rebound. Rebound has not been  observed at any Six
    Phase Soil Heating site.

•   The presence of perched water does not reduce the effectiveness of Six Phase Soil Heating.

In Situ Thermal Remediation (Steam Injection)

Thermal remediation by steam injection and recovery uses Dynamic Underground Stripping, Steam Enhanced
Extraction, Hydrous  Pyrolysis/Oxidation,  and  Electrical  Resistance Tomography. Combining  these
technologies the Dynamic Underground Stripping System uses boilers to generate steam which is then pumped
into injection wells that  surround the contaminants. The steam front volatilizes and mobilizes the contaminants
as it pushes the resulting steam  front toward a central network extraction well where it is vacuumed to the
surface. Direct electrical heating of  soils, clay and  fine-grained sediments causes  trapped water and
contaminants to vaporize and forces them into  steam zones where vacuum extraction removes them. Electrical
Resistance Tomography is used as a process control method to measure electric resistance and temperatures
in the subsurface that allow for real-time control of the heating process.

Benefits

•   Faster clean-up, potential closure within months to years, not decades

•   Removes source contaminants effectively

•   Treats contamination both above and below the water table, with no practical depth limitation

5. RESULTS

To be determined.

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)            September 1999




6. HEALTH AND SAFETY




To be determined.




7. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS




To be determined.




8. COSTS




To be determined.




9. CONCLUSIONS




To be determined.




10. REFERENCES




Progress reports to be generated

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)             September 1999

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)            September 1999
                     COUNTRY TOUR DE TABLE PRESENTATIONS

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)             September 1999
                                          ARMENIA

Nowadays the most urgent problems in Armenia are the environmental protection and the rational use of nature
resources. The land contamination problem is the priority one from the land resources management problems.

The following Laws and Regulations have been developed and adopted by the Ministry of Nature Protection
of Republic of Armenia  for ecologically safe and economically effective management of environmental
protection:
1.   Principles of Nature Protection Legislation in the RA (1991);
2.   Land Code of Armenia (1991);
3.   Water Code of Armenia (1992);
4.   RA Law on the Air Protection (1994);
5.   Act of the Republic of Armenia on Environmental impact assessment (1995);
6.   Law of Republic of Armenia on Nature Protection and Environmental Management fees and charges
    (1998.28.12),  and corresponding
7.   Governmental Decision N864, introducing taxes and fees on atmospheric and water pollution; industrial
    wastes disposal  in  landfills, on the use of surface waters, groundwaters and mineral water and on
    discharges of the industrial sewage (1998.30.12). Operational industrial and transport companies pay taxes
    and fees, regardless of ownership.

The Land Protection and Hazardous Substances Registration and  Control Divisions of Ministry of Nature
Protection RA are responsible for the management of contaminated sites in Armenia. There are several sources
of land contamination and the following contaminated site types are of major importance in accordance with
sources.

Problem of the land contaminated by industrial wastes still remains urgent despite the economic decline in
recent years due to the collapse of Soviet Union and numerous  socio-economic problems. In Armenia main
sources of industrial pollution are due to mining, metallurgical, chemical and construction sectors of industry
such as copper-molybdenum factories in Kadjaran, Kapan, copper factory in Alaverdy; gold-extracting factory
in Ararat; chemical  and cement plants in Ararat. Hrazdan, Yerevan  and Vanadzor cities  and etc. Their
emissions and tails contain a complex of different chemical  substances, including  heavy metals - lead,
cadmium, copper, molybdenum, iron, arsenic and others, and compounds such as fluorine, chlorine, cyanic
and nitrogen as well. These  chemicals and their compounds can be  the source of land and groundwater
contamination. About 20 square km of the territory around the Ararat gold-extracting factory had contaminated
by heavy metals. The concentrations of heavy metals exceed maximum allowable concentration (MAC) several
times.

From the  environmental point of view the Kapan. Shaumyan mine  deposits are sources of technogenic
environmental contamination. The  enormous waste  volumes have been accumulated during long-term
exploitation of mine deposits. The concentrations of copper, lead, zinc in soil, plants and bottom sedimentation
are  considerably high up to 200 mg/kg, 5 mg/kg and 50 mg/kg accordingly.  The total area of high-
contaminated sites around the above mentioned mine deposits is 10 square km.

In technogenic zone of Kadjaran factory the land contamination with molybdenum and copper is considerably
high too. The average concentration of molybdenum in soil surface layer was 10 mg/kg. In agricultural crops
cultivated on such soils (tomato, potato, pepper, beans and  fodder crops) concentration  of copper and
molybdenum is also high.

The teclmogenic factors impact groundwater too. In mining sites of Kadjaran, Kapan, Alaverdy the content
of some chemicals (lead, molybdenum, copper and others) in groundwater have increased in connection with
mine deposits development. Their concentration exceeds often the maximum allowable concentration. Now
more man 100 lands of organic pollutants are revealed in groundwaters. The concentration of oil, pesticides,

                                             92

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)              September 1999

including DDT, DDE,  lindane and  etc.  exceeds maximum allowable concentration tenfold.  Thus the
ground-water protection from technogenic pollution is also a very important problem.

The landfills are of no less importance in land contamination problem. During the industrial rise (1985-90
years) mere were generated about 36.7 million tons of industrial wastes. 20 thousand tons of which were toxic.
At present it is difficult to estimate the current rates of industrial waste generation in Armenia. There are no
facilities and technologies required for treatment and recoveiy of recyclable industrial and municipal wastes.
Significant part of industrial waste is dumped in municipal waste landfills without any identification and
treatment. Municipal waste disposal is carried out not in environmentally and hygienic sound manner. There
are 45 urban and 429 rural landfills in Armenia; most of them do not correspond to hygienic requirements and
standards. The total territory of landfills covers nearly 1.4 thousand ha. They have been constructed without
special permission or environmental impact assessment.

Another source of land contamination is agriculture. Large amounts of biologically active compounds, such
as pesticides, penetrate into the environment due to agricultural activity. The average level of pesticides used
was 9 kg per ha. In recent years above 20 types of pesticides were applied in Lake Sevan region. Now
pesticides import and using quantities are out of control due to privatization of agricultural lands (1992) and
destruction of centralized system of pesticides supply. Organochlorine pesticides are considered to be global
contaminants as they can circulate in the environment for a long time. The problem of their proper use is still
actual nowadays. The application of DDT (1972) and lindane (since 1981 in Lake Sevan region) was banned,
as the persistent chemicals, in the former Soviet Union. But there have been determined organochlorine
pesticides residues (DDE, lindane) in surface waters of Lake Sevan. In spite of the prohibition the residues of
organochlorine metabolites still circulate and are detected in human milk and surface waters. Therefore one
of the reasons of organochlorines detection is, probably, the land contamination, as soil is storage for persistent
compounds.

Scientists of the National Academy Center of Ecological  and Noospheric investigations have developed and
begin to implement the  method of mapping sites contaminated by heavy metals.  It will contribute to the
representation of the risk assessment among citizens. Scientists of the Center are working out the technology
for the purification of contaminated sites.
Specialists have suggested to undertake efforts to reuse mining wastes of tails in  order to extract metals'
residues.

The problem of waste management is one of the priority ecological problem in Armenia.The first and very
important stage in waste management is collection and analysis of information concerning industrial waste
(generation, storage, recycling, utilization, burial etc.) as well as working out the data bank on wastes. At
present the waste legislation in Armenia is at the stage of active formation. The aim of the legislative process
is to elaborate documentation, which would ensure the most ecologically and economically advisable use of
wastes disposal.

The present economic situation in Armenia makes it impossible to do state investments in the field of different
environmental programs. Practically there are no governmental funds available for investigations. So with the
technical and financial assistance of the International organizations the implementation of programs would be
feasible. We expect much benefit from our further collaboration and look forward to joint partnership.
                                              93

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)             September 1999


                                           AUSTRIA

1. LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUES

Austria has no specific national law related to soil protection, but policy in the field of contaminated land was
passed in the Federal Act on the Clean-up of Contaminated Sites (ALSAG) in 1989. This act created a national
uniform structure for the registration and assessment of contaminated sites and established the prioritisation
of sites for urgent attention (including a definition of contaminated sites). However, the main focus of this act
is to provide a fund for remediation via a waste tax. The amount of the waste tax  is set in the Landfill
Ordinance.  The Landfill Ordinance specifies parameters related to the quality of the waste to be deposited in
landfills in terms of limit values for total pollutant content and related contaminant constituent values in waste
samples. In addition, this law  specifies four types of landfills: landfills for excavated soils, landfills for
demolition waste, landfills for residual materials and mass waste landfills, with each type of landfill legally
accepting only certain types of waste. The Landfill Ordinance calls for the pre-disposal segregation of waste
streams as well as improved pre-treatment of waste prior to disposal.

Execution of ALSAG is  highly related with  the Water Act  from 1959.  The Water Act is  based on the
precautionary principle and aims to maintain clean water resources. Therefore contaminated groundwater has
to be restored to drinking water quality in most cases. These requirements restrict the  landuse-dependend
setting of clean-up targets.
At present the Federal Ministy of Environment. Youth and Family is working on  an amendment to ALSAG
which will exclude contaminated sites of the Water Act and allows an improved management of contaminated
sites on their current and intended uses. Also the polluter-pays-principle should be strengthened in the
amendment.

In order to support  sound decision making, the Austrian Standards Institute will publish a standard on
"Contamined Sites-Risk Assessment concerning the Pollution of Soil" in spring 2000.

2. REGISTRATION OF CONTAMINATED SITES

The Federal Environment Agency registered  by January 1999 2.476 suspected sites of which 2.303 are
landfills and 173  are industrial sites. Deatiled investigations showed so far that 145 sites  pose a considerable
risk to human health or  the environment and therefore were classified as contaminated sites.

hi order to support  the identification of potentially contaminated industrial sites,the  Federal Ministy of
Environment, Youth and Family launched a study that identified the main production steps and substances
produced of different industrial branches. It is planned to publish a summary of this study by end of 1999.

Remediation projects for registered contaminated sites are fundedn via the Oesterreichische Komunalkredit
AG on behalf of the Federal Ministry of Environment, Youth and Family. In the last ten years, 97 remediation
projects, with a total cost of ATS 3,4 billion (approx. 283 million US$) were funded.

3. TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM

There is no specific technology development program on a federal level. Initiatives are set on a case-by-case
basis. However, current interest focuses on reactive barrier technologies, in-situ bioremediation and various
monitoring technologies (bioassays).
                                             94

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)             September 1999

4. REMEDIAL METHODS IN USE

"Safeguarding" Methods:            Number
capping of landfill                           29
extraction of landfill gas                      11
enclosure                                   32
hydraulic measures                          38
pump and treat                              20
in-situ sorting of material                      9

Remediation Methods:                Number
excavation off site                           24
ground-water remediation                     11
soil vapor extraction/bio venting               18
bioremediation                               2
soil washing                                 4
thermal treatment                             4
biological treatment                          4
immobilisation                               4

In some cases, combinations of various treatment technologies have been carried out.

5. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES

•   'Application of Bioassays for Risk Assessment and Risk Monitoring of PAH-contaminated Sites', IFA-
    Tulln, funded  by the  Federal Ministry for Environment,  Youth and Family  via Oesterreichische
    Kommunalkredit AG
•   'Bioremediation in the Rhizosphere', IFA-Tulln, funded by EU DG XII, 4. FP on Environment and Climate
    1997
•   'Bioventing of Hydrocarbon contaminated sites', IFA-Tulln, funded by City of Vienna
•   "Monitoring Program for Contaminated Soils", IFA-Tulln
•   'Age Assessment of HC-based Soil Contaminations', Fichte Institute, Technical University of Vienna
•   'Contaminated Sites-Risk Assessment concerning the Pollution of Groundwater", Austrian Standards
    Institute
•   'Contaminated Sites-Risk Assessment concerning the Pollution of Soil", Austrian  Standards Institute
•   'Recommendation for the Use of Orientating-Values for the Risk Assessment in Austria". EPA Austria
•   'Application of Ecotoxicological Testsystems during the Bioremediation of Organic Pollutants in Soil',
    IFA-Tulln, funded by Federal Ministry of Science
•   'Interactions between high volatile chlorinated Hydrocarbons and chlorinated phenols with natural and
    organophilic Clays", Inst. for Applied Geology, Vienna
•   'Development and application of a fractioned Soil Analysis', Univ. of Soil and Agriculture, Vienna
•   'Risk Assessment for the Land Application of Sewage Sludge', Univ. of Soil and  Agriculture, Vienna
•   'Investigation and Assessment of Potential Waste  Sites in Styria (Austria)', Joanneum Research, Graz
                                            95

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)              September 1999
                                           BELGIUM

Please note that this tour de table was prepared for the 1998 Annual Report. According to Belgium 's country!
representative, the information is still relevant for the 1999 Annual Report.

1. LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUES

a. Background Information

The Belgian institutional framework dividing the authority between the Federal State and the Regions confers
the responsibility of environment protection policy almost  exclusively to the  Regions,  with very few
exceptions. And soil is no exception.

This means that there cannot be such thing as a federal legislation on Soil protection; the only common
framework could come (as it is the case for Air, Water and Waste legislation) from the European Commission,
where a proposal  on civil  liability for environmental damages is considered since 1993, but with limited
chances of implementation in the near future.

Therefore, the three Regions, Flanders, Brussels Region and Wallonia, are free to act or not, in this issue,
according to their own policy, the requirements of their citizens, and the constraints of their economy.

Until now, only Flanders has adopted a full legislative framework, although Brussels and Wallonia will
probably present this year their own propositions.

b. Summary of Legislation

The Flemish Decree on soil remediation, adopted in 1995, has been brought into force in different  stages
through the end of 1996. The main characteristics cover five key issues:

  •      a register of contaminated land;
  •     the difference between historical and new soil contamination;
  •     the difference between duty and liability for decontamination;
  •     the soil decontamination compulsory procedure and control; and
  •     the transfer of land.

In addition, soil standards, background levels and intervention values have been adopted by the Flemish
Government. The  intervention values depend on future land use. Five groups of land  uses  have been
distinguished. There is also a list of activities which could create soil pollution, and will need to be investigated
(see §2).

c. The Concept of Contaminated Sites

One of the most significant features in the Flemish Decree is the difference created between "historical" and
"new" pollution.

"Ffistorical" soil pollution are those originated before the decree came into force; "new" soil pollution are those
produced since the decree came into force. A "mixed" situation is also considered.

The clean-up of "new" pollution is, according to the decree, required as soon as the intervention values for soil
clean-up are exceeded. For "historical" pollution on the contrary, the decision to  clean-up will depend on the
danger to man and the environment.  So a site specific risk-assessment approach will be followed in this
situation. Considering the limited financial resources  available, the clean-up of historic pollution will follow
a priority classification established by the Flemish government.

                                              96

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)              September 1999


d. Administrative Aspects

For institutional reasons (see § 1 .a), there is no Federal Agency for the Environment:

•   OVAM (Public Waste Agency of Flanders) is the responsible authority for soil control and remediation
    in the Flemish Region.

•   In Wallonia, as long as no decree on soil remediation has been passed, responsibilities are shared between
    two administrative bodies: the Walloon Waste Office is the responsible authority for landfills and other
    sites polluted by waste, and the Town and Country Planning Administration is responsible for derelict
    land and brownfield sites.

•   In Brussels, the authority is the Brussels Institute for Environmental Management.

e. Summary of Anticipated Policy Developments

A Soil Decree is  in preparation in Wallonia, which should be presented  this year to legislative adoption.
Guidelines for investigations and assessment, and soil criteria, are also prepared.  Soil criteria, a mapping
strategy and a possible ordinance are considered in the Brussels Region. Our next report will present the
situation at the end of 1998 in the two Regions.

2. REGISTRATION OF CONTAMINATED SITES

a. Flanders

According to the new legislation, a soil register has been created in Flanders. The Flemish authorities proceed
with a systematic  examination of potentially polluted areas mainly on three occasions:

  •     at the time of property transfer;
  •     at the closure of licensed installations; and
  •     whenever the license (authorization) has to be renewed.

Considering the varying delays for industrial license  renewals, a special soil control obligation has been
introduced in the general authorization procedure; so the ultimate deadline seems to be the year 2003 (with
intermediate deadlines in 1999 and 2001): by that time, all industrial sites in use should have been checked,
and re-authorized or compelled to consider clean-up measures (to be implemented before 2006).

The information on soil pollution is compiled in the soil register under the administration of OVAM (Public
Waste Agency of Flanders). This register serves as a data base for policy decisions and also as an instrument
to protect and inform all potential land purchasers.

A "soil certificate" is requested for all sorts of property transfers. This system has increased the number of
voluntary investigations, and sometimes induces voluntary remediations, in  order to avoid to be listed as
contaminated in the register.

The Flemish legislation lays a special responsibility on  registered soil decontamination experts. These are the
responsible body  for soil examination,  under the supervision of OVAM which selects them according to
expertise criteria,  and control their work.
                                              97

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)              September 1999

According to OVAM'S Remediation Service1, at the end of February 1998, there were 5,528 potentially
contaminated sites in different parcels of land listed in the soil register. As of the same date, there were about
8,000 parcels of land mentioned as contaminated in the register.

Remediation  programs are launched for about 70 sites. Registered soil decontamination experts have to
develop and carry out those programs, according to the procedure and soil standards. They will also have to
control the final result of the clean-up, under the supervision of OVAM.

b. Wallonia

A registration system has  existed since 1978 for industrial derelict land and brownfield sites, based on a
specific town and country planning legislation aiming at the redevelopment of those sites. In 1989, a special
program, entrusted to the GEHAT at Brussels University, was launched by the Town and Country Planning
Administration to assess the risk of contamination on all registered sites. It is based on preliminary assessments
and includes a four level risk ladder. The resulting data base serves for policy decisions, to select priorities for
detailed site investigations, and for remediations plans if proven necessary.

A more elaborate hazard ranking system has been developed recently for dumping sites by the SPAQUE
(Walloon Public Society for the Quality of Environment) under the supervision of the Walloon Waste Office.
The ranking is performed on the basis of a check-list considering source, vectors and risk groups.

An estimation of about 5,000 potentially contaminated sites is currently mentioned; of these, 2,200 industrial
derelict sites are already registered and classified in the Town & Country Planning data base. Among the sites
presenting a high risk factor, about 90 have been submitted to detailed investigations (as of February 1998);
a dozen are now benefitting from remediation programs. For sites presenting a lower risk factor, detailed
investigations are ordered only when a redevelopment strategy is planned, whether by a public or a private
operator. In addition, the SPAQUE assessed 17 heavily polluted "priority sites," among former dumping and
deposit sites.  Four of them are in the remediation process.

c. Brussels Region

No registration system is known at this moment. A first investigations/mapping strategy is in preparation.

3. REMEDIAL METHODS

Until recently, there have been no comprehensive statistics on remedial methods and technologies used for
clean-up in Belgium. The following  soil and groundwater remediation techniques  are available and used*:

1.  Excavation and transport of contaminated material to a deposit site and/or processing of the contaminated
    soil.

2.  Hydrodynamic methods, by means of drains, water remediation, processing of slurry, etc.

3.  Use of degassing systems.

4.  Use of isolation techniques (horizontal and vertical isolation by means of cement, clay, bentonite, bitumen,
    etc.

5.  Immobilization techniques by means of cement, lime, absorption methods for oil, etc.
'Data collected with the help of Ecorem n.v.

                                              98

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)              September 1999

6.  Remediation technologies: microbiological remediation, in situ and ex situ (landfarming, biopiles, etc.),
    water and chemical extraction, flotation, thermal treatment, steam-stripping, a combination of physico-
    chemical and biological remediation techniques, electro-reclamation, infiltration and wash out.

4. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, AND DEMONSTRATION

For soils contaminated with heavy metals and metalloids, the following remedial techniques are in research
and/or anticipated for use in the coming years:

•   In situ immobilization by means of soil additives.
•   Bio-extraction of heavy metals by means of micro-organisms in a slurry-reactor.
•   Phyto-extraction by means of plants with increased capacities of metal-accumulation.

More generally, there is a great need and expectation for low-energy, cost-effective remedial technologies.
Research is progressing in the Universities  and Public research Institutes, mainly in microbiology  and
phytoremediation areas, although no comprehensive evaluation is yet available.

In Flanders, a risk-evaluation model was evaluated and approved by OVAM. Research has been implemented
on the prioritization of historical soil pollution,  and a decision-supporting system has been developed to
estimate which technologies are most appropriate at this moment, taking the costs  into account. OVAM is also
chairing a Committee on "Normalization of soil remediation."

5. CONCLUSIONS

Since the adoption of the Flemish Decree on soil remediation, mere has been a growing recognition of soil and
groundwater contamination issues in Belgium. The implementation and the  first results of the Flemish Decree
are generally considered satisfactory by Public authorities, and this stimulates the  two other Regions, Brussels
and Wallonia, to define their own policy. But these policies might be based on rather different legal schemes,
clean-up guidelines and soil criteria. For instance, should these criteria be compulsory or subject to site-specific
interpretation is a matter of debate in the two Regions.

At the same time, in the private sector, the big companies are preparing the ground, or even anticipating the
future legal impositions. Their main question is  now: to what extent will it be possible to adopt different
strategies and levels of soil protection in the three belgian Regions? More generally, the two main problems
to be tackled in the near future will probably be:

•   the lack of resources of many liable parties, for the cleanup of historical pollution; and

•   the cost-efficiency and environmental merit of the remediation programs, whether funded by public or
    private money.
                                              99

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)              September 1999
                                           CANADA

There has been an increased level of activity in the area of hazardous sites within the past year. That increase
is within both the private and public sectors with all levels of government participating.  As an example, there
are now  hazardous site working groups active within Environment Canada, where  the Regions and
Headquarters participate, and across the various government departments.

The best known example of a hazardous site within Canada is the Sydney Tar Ponds where waste disposal
practices from a steel making complex has contaminated a large area.  The 34 hectares of ponds contain
approximately 500,000 tonnes of contaminated material.  The contamination includes polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons (PAHs), heterocyclic nitrogen compounds (HNCs), PCBs and heavy metals.

In late May, the Federal Government and the Province of Nova Scotia announced a $62 Million (Canadian)
fund for the tar ponds. The work will include the moving of residents nearest to the site, the channeling of
domestic  sewage away from the site, health  studies and a program for pilot-scale  demonstrations of
technologies that might be applicable to the remediation of the site.

Further announcements from the Federal Government concerning hazardous sites are expected in the autumn.
                                            100

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)              September 1999


                                     CZECH REPUBLIC

1.1 LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUES

Following laws and decrees concerning environment were issued in the Czech Republic in 1998 and 1999.

Law No. 125/1997 Coll.. on Waste (New Waste Management Act) entered into force  on  1 January 1998
includes two categories of waste: hazardous and others. It was followed with important  connected decrees:

•   Decree of the Ministry of the Environment of the  Czech Republic No. 337/1997 Coll.. editing the
    catalogue of wastes and defining additional list of wastes, with effect of January 1st 1998

•   Decree of the Ministry  of the Environment of the Czech Republic No. 338/1997 Coll., on details of the
    waste management, with effect of January 1st 1998.

•   Decree of the Ministry  of the Environment of the Czech Republic No. 339/1997 Coll., on evaluation of
    dangerous properties of wastes, with effect of January 1st 1998

•   Decree of the Ministry of the Environment of the Czech Republic No. 340/1997 Coll., where the financial
    reserve resources, details of the creation and usage of these reserves for reclamation, maintenance and
    decontamination of the  landfills after their closing are determined, with effect of January 1st 1998

Law No. 123/1998 coll., on the Right of Access to Information on the Environment entered into force on 1
July 1998. It was issued in the connection with harmonizing of the Czech legislative with the legislative of
EU.

Law No. 14/1998 on Waters (Small Water Act Amendment) ,with effect of March  6th 1998, changes and
completes very old Law No  138/1973 Coll. on Waters (Water Act). The main scopes of it are protective zones
of water sources and measures against illegal and improper handling with dangerous substances which causes
pollution of surface water and groundwater.

Law No. 157/1998 coll. on Chemical Substances and Preparations entered into force of 1 January 1999. It was
supplemented with following decrees:

•   Decree of the Ministry of the Environment  of the Czech Republic No. 340/1997 Coll., where  is
    established a way for risk appraisal of dangerous chemical substances to the environment.

•   Decree of the Government of the Czech Republic No.25/1999 Coll., where is established a process of the
    appraisal of dangerous nature of chemical substances and preparations and the way of their labelling , and
    a list of classified dangerous chemical substances is  issued.

1.2 Registration of Contaminated Sites

a) Major problems
The most widespread pollutants were still oil products (petrol, diesel, kerosene, lubricating and heating oils),
chlorinated aliphatic hydrocarbons (DCE. TCE, PCE) in 1998 followed by heavy metals. Organic refractants
(PAHs, wood-preserving agents, tars) were more often tackled in 1998 than before.

b) Background information on site registration
•   Former SA bases have got complete registration including the records of remediation progress at them in
    the Ministry of Environment
                                            101

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)              September 1999

•   Contaminated sites of the Czech Army are registered by Ministry of Defence and its regional branches (so
    called VUSS). A new concept of area! registration of contaminated and potentially contaminated sites with
    the help of GIS has been started.

•   Central registration of contaminated sites including waste dumps and landfills has been organised by the
    MoE (Department of Environmental  Damages)  with the  help  of so called ,,SESEZ" database. This
    database has been supplied with data on all old environmental burden, their investigation and remediation
    since 1996. There are several sources of data: MoE. National Property Fund (NPF) and District Offices.
    Up today 861 sites, 702 landfills and waste dumps,  including logs of 6000 boreholes and wells.

•   The MoE - Department of Wastes cooperates with the registration of landfills and waste dumps too.

•   The Regional Department in Chomutov (North Bohemia) of the  MoE with the financial support of the
    Zuid -Holland Province organised the project ,,Inventory of Illegal Wastes Dumps" in the districts Diein,
    Usti nad Labem, Teplice, Most, Chomutov, Litomioice, Louny, Karlovy Vary, Sokolov, Cheb  and later
    Jablonec nad Nisou,  in the North Bohemian Region. A huge number of 2000 illegal landfills and waste
    dumps was found here  and priorities of remediation of them were set.

•   The National Property Fund has its own registration of those contaminated sites only which remediation
    is financed by the NPF respectively which were privatised  according Act   No. 92/1991  and/or
    contaminated sites (with environmental assessment) of companies which asked NPF for financing of
    remediation in the process of the second wave  of privatisation (from 1992) .

c)  Estimated total number of contaminated sites and administration of them
•   The preliminary results of the project 530/2/98 have proved that there were about 1600 active landfills
    which had been used according special conditions of the Law No 238/91 Coll. in the Czech Republic.
    These landfills are closed now and remediation was finished at 420 localities of them. It is estimated mat
    there were another 250-300 landfills which were used without special, above mentioned conditions. There
    exist another 2500 - 4000 landfills which had been closed before  the effect of the above mentioned law.
    The most frequent group of landfills and waste dumps is consisted of localities where were (even have
    been) disposed wastes illegally. The number of them is estimated up to  11 000 (Janouskova 1999).

•   There were about 60 contaminated former Soviet Army bases in the Czech Republic.  The remediation
    has been or will be accomplished at  the most of them  until 2003. The total cost of investigation and
    remediation of former Soviet bases in the Czech Republic from 1991 to 1998 was over 890 million CZK
    (Kroova, Krhovsky 1999). Only the clean up of the two biggest ones: Mlada - Milovice and  Ralsko  -
    Hradeany will last until 2006 and 2008 respectively. Registration of former SA bases is administered by
    the MoE.

•   Eight biggest contaminated Czech military sites being returned to civilian use will be cleaned up until 2000
    - 2005.  Five other biggest contaminated Czech military sites which are and will be used by Czech Army
    will be  also remediated till 2000-2005. Environmental assessment at the both mentioned groups of sites
    was carried out according to the 1992 Methodical Instructions. There exist some 300 small contaminated
    military sites which will be environmentally assessed and some  of them  remediated step by step.  The
    administration of contaminated site is done by regional offices of the MoD so called VUSS; the central
    administration is carried out by the MoD.

•   The National  Property Fund of the  Czech  Republic  administered and registered  (and  guaranteed
    remediation there) 300 contaminated sites between years  1991 -1997 (particularly in the so called second
    privatisation wave). About 100 contaminated sites from the former privatisation wave are not registered
    neither  guaranteed for their remediation. Financing of clean-up,when provided by the NPF, followed an
    obligator^' environmental audit and, since 1994, a risk assessment analysis. Relevant agreements signed
    between new owners and the NPF must be approved by the MoE.
                                            102

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)              September 1999

•   By the end of 1996 a total of 5 550 environmental audits had been carried out in the framework of
    privatisation. Ten per cent of pollution burden have estimated remediation cost beyond 1 million CZK.
    The cost in 50 cases was estimated to be more man 500 million CZK The cost often cases was estimated
    over 1 billion CZK (OECD 1999). Five sites have been cleaned up; around 140 sites were in the process
    in 1998. Hundreds of contracts for remediation of other sites are in preparation. By the end of 1997, 3.3
    billion CZK had been spent on clean-up.

•   The largest contracts for clean-up between the NPF (and the MoE) and owners were  closed with: the
    Skoda car factory in Mlada  Boleslav (Middle  Bohemia), the Chemical plants in Litvinov  (North
    Bohemia),), the Ostrava-Karvina Mines (North Moravia- remediation of previous coke plant and chemical
    plant Ostrava-Karolina) and the Skoda factory in Plzeo (Pilsen) in West Bohemia .

d) Estimated number of sites for future remediation
•   Former Soviet bases: 9, planned cost over 469 million CZK,  including Milovice-Mlada (Camp and
    Airfield)-102,9 mil.CZK) and Ralsko- Hradeany Airfield- 299,78 mil.CZK

•   Czech military sites: 300

•   Illegal waste dumps without  known owner or user: over 200: But there is presently no particular
    programme aiming at the remediation of closed landfills with hazardous waste.

•   Contaminated industrial sites guaranteed by the National Property Fund: 300 - 500

•   The total cost of clean-up of polluted sites administered by the NPF will be more man 60 billion CZK
    (OECD 1999).

1.3 Remedial Methods

a) Summary data on remedial methods
•   Soils:  ex situ: bioreclamation ( oil hydrocarbons, BTEX, PAHs, PCBs), washing, leaching (heavy metals,
    PCBs); stabilisation-solidification (HC, PAHs, PCBs); incineration (tars, HC, organic refractants (more
    or less experimental stage only), poisons), venting (chlorinated hydrocarbons (CHC), HC, BTEX);
    landfilling (heavy metals, organic refractants, HC, PCBs up to  100 mg/kg d.m.)

•   Soils:  in situ: soil vapour extraction (HC, BTEX, CHC), bioreclamation plus washing  (HC,  PAHs,
    partially CHC), encapsulation (all pollutants)

•   Groundwater: pump and treat (all pollutants)

•   Groundwater: in situ: vacuum extraction (HC, BTEX, CHC); bioreclamation (HC, BTEX, PAHs); air
    sparging (HC, BTEX, CHC); cobalt radiation destruction (cyanides), encapsulation by impermeable walls-
    all pollutants

•   Auxiliary in situ methods: pneumatic and hydraulic fracturing, well blasting, soil heating, surfactant
    flushing.

b) Factors influencing use of remedial methods
Hydrogeological and physical properties of soil and rocks, chemical-physical properties      of pollutants,
target concentration of pollutants, amount of contaminated soils, infrastructure of contaminated site (buildings
and roads  which cannot be destroyed or removed), land - use and legislative restrictions, time and money

c) Trends of remediation methods
Hydraulic methods when clean-up of  oil  pollution  will be more and more supplemented  with  in situ
bioreclamation in late phases of decontamination of aquifers.

                                            103

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)             September 1999

When both ground-water and soil are contaminated with VOCs ( mostly  volatile oil hydrocarbons and
chlorinated aliphatic hydrocarbons ) pump and treat method is to be combined from very beginning with SVE,
vacuum extraction and later with air sparging.

For viscous hydrocarbons and organic refractants remediation in general where time aspect is vital, thermal
or steam stripping and/or venting should be introduced.
Promising alternative method seems to be flushing of vadoze zone with degradable environmentally safe
surfactants completed with groundwater pumping and in situ bioreclamation..

d) Summary evaluation of effectiveness of remediation
The cheapest and most effective and reliable remediation of soil polluted with hydrocarbons is ex situ
bioreclamation without any doubts  .
When soils are contaminated with volatile HC and simultaneously with CHC the most effective method is soil
vapour extraction (SVE).

Pump and treat methods are reliable and versatile but their economy is worsening by each further year or
month of clean-up,  according the decrease of pollutants concentration. High temperature incineration is too
expensive and till now is used for very harmful substances such poisons and some combat chemical only.

1.4 Research , Development, and Demonstration

a) Summary of areas of government-supported RD andD
The Ministry of Environment provides research grants for topics of its choosing such as  environmental
assessment, registration of former contaminated sites and remediation methods. The grants are awarded
following competitive bidding.

The Ministry of Defence has funded areal register/inventory of military sites including contaminated  ones
with the help of  GIS.

b) More detailed information on RD and D can be seen from the following list of research projects and
demonstrations.

•   Areal  register and database of former contaminated sites ..SESEZ". including former waste disposal
    dumps. Registration has started in 10 districts with the help of GIS in 1996 and will last till 2000 at least.
    This project (No. 530/2/98) is listed in the following table.
                                             104

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)
September 1999
Table 1 Selected existing research projects concerning water and soil quality of the MoE
No.of project
510/1/98
510/4/98
550/1/98
550/2/98
530/2/98
340/1/97
Beginning
1998
1998
1998
1998
1998
1997
End
1999
2002
1999
2000
2000
1999
Name
Pilot project for the control and introduction of die
Directive for quality monitoring of the trounsboundary
rivers in the Morava River water catchment area
Limitation of the areal contamination of surface waters
and groundwaters in the Czech Republic
Indicators of thenatural bioreclamation capacity of
rock medium
Remedial technologies for removal of contamination
with chlorinated hydrocarbons
Environmental risks evaluation of the closed landfills
(which had been used according special conditions
relating to the Law Nr.238/1991 Coll.. or closed
before the effect of the mentioned law ): establishing
a register for those landfills including the proposal of
measures and prioririties
Impacts of environmental contamination on the state
of human health in the Teplice Region
Total cost
for years
1998-9
(thousand
CZK)
3 000
10 500
880
2700
4200
194 248
•   Spolchemie a.s.- Usti nad Labem (North Bohemia). NATO/CCMS Demonstration Project No.  56.
    Investigation of mercury-contaminated site has started in 1996. The highest Hg concentration of soils were
    found at the level of 707 mg/kg and in groundwater at 154, lug/L. Even droplets of liquid mercury in soils
    were found. Up to several hundred |ig/l of chlorinated hydrocarbons were analysed in groundwater too.
    (EPA1998)
    The risk assessment was updated in 1998. New boreholes found presence of mercury even at depths of
    20 m. A pilot test of remediation technology is to be undertaken.

c)  Future activities

The MoE has prepared among others the following projects for the next years:

       Table 2 Selected  new research projects concerning water and soil quality of the MoE
No.of project
510/1/99
510/3/99
550/1/99
530/2/99
Beginning
1999
1999
1999
1999
End
2002
2001
2001
2000
Name
Protection and use of water sources in a copmplete
water catchment
Conception for the long-term nutrient reduction in the
water courses in the Czech Republic
Groundwater treatment with the help of sorbents of
coal origin
Technologies for the treatment of areas (landfills)
strongly contaminated with chlorinated hydrocarbons
Total cost
(thousand
CZK)
28000
6050
3000
1 900
1.5 Conclusions

a) General conclusions
Legislation is under permanent development, when we are harmonizing our legislative with mat of EU.
The main problems much more technical than financial ones of contaminated sites are connected with the
environmental items of privatisation projects of so called second wave of privatisation. Particularly there are
                                           105

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)             September 1999

sometimes discrepancies between aimed decontamination limits of pollution on one hand and the time and
economical limitations on the other hand.  Both technical and legislative/financial difficulties are and will be
connected with environmental assessment end eventual remediation of former waste dumps of unknown
owners or users and of the contaminated industrial sites from the  so called first wave of privatisation.

b), c) Remedial methods implemented for future
Remediation of fissured aquifers contaminated with chlorinated volatile organics and refractants at whole will
pose significant task for future. One of ways how to tackle it will be the above mentioned research grants and
the second way may be the demonstration of up-to-date and/or developing technologies. Steam stripping and/or
heating and electroreclamation seem to be very promising; however we have till now nearly no experience with
them in our country.

We hope that just developing in the frame of NATO/  CCMS activities method of natural attenuation of
pollution will help us to tackle non urgent cases of groundwater pollution.

REFERENCES

Anon.  (1998): Statistical Environmental Yearbook of the Czech Republic  1998.  The  Ministry  of the
Environment of the Czech Republic, Czech Statistical Office, The Czech Environmental Institute, Praha .

EPA (1998): NATO/CCMS Pilot Study Evaluation of Demonstrated and Emerging Technologies for the
Treatment and Clean Up of Contaminated Land and Groundwater. Phase n Final Report Number 219. EPA
542-R-98-001A, June 1998

OECD (1999): Environmental Performance Reviews Czech Republic. OECD Publications, Paris.
Janouskova R. (1999): Supplement No 1 Specifications of Aims and Parameters of the Project VaV/530/2/98.
MoE, Department of Wastes,  Czech Republic (in Czech)

Kroova H., Krhovsky J.  (1999): Removal of Old Environmental Burden at the Former Soviet Army Bases in
the Czech Republic.  (In Czech) Odpady , Praha. In Press.

Pavlik R., Gruntorad J. (1999): SESEZ - Presentation of an Active Database and  Demonstration of Data and
Outputs.)  Odpady, Praha. In Press.

Schaefer K. W. et al.  (1997): International  Experience and Expertise in Registration, Investigation, Assessment
and Clean-Up of Contaminated Military Sites, 155-184. Texts  5/97.   Research  Project No. 103 40 102/01
UBA-FB 97-012/e. Federal Environmental Agency, Berlin.

Svoma J. (1996):  Remediation of Soil and Groundwater in the Czech Republic. In: E. A. McBean et al. (eds.)
Remediation of Soil and Groundwater, 45-57. Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands.

Svoma J. (1998): Draft for Tour de Table Presentation for Phase H NATO CCMS Pilot Study Meetings in
Vienna, February 1998

Oral information (1999) by RNDr. J. Krhovsky, CSc and RNDr J. Gruntorad.  (MoE), Ing. J.Adler (MoD),
 RNDr. L. Bi« a (National Property Fund ).
                                            106

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)              September 1999


                                          DENMARK

0. INTRODUCTION

This Tour de Table presentation will focus on ongoing initiatives related to soil contamination. A more detailed
description of the legal system, the most important acts and The Programme for Development of Technology,
Soil and Groundwater Contamination can be found in the final report from the NATO CCMS meeting in
Vienna, Austria 1998.

1. LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUES

Since the meeting in  1998 the Danish EPA has published two new guidelines in December 1998, and new
legislation on soil contamination (The Soil Contamination Act) has been presented to the Parliament on 10
February 1999.

1.1  The New Guidelines
The titles of the guidelines are:
•  Remediation of Contaminated Sites no. 6-11  1998,
•  Sampling and Analysis of Soil no.  13 1998.

The guidelines on  Remediation of Contaminated Sites  are presently being translated  into English. The
guidelines describe how a contaminated site should be handled, beginning with the survey, conducting risk
assessments and establishing the required remedial actions.

One of the new elements of the guidelines is that biological degradation under natural conditions is considered
in the risk assessment for a limited number of contaminants. A contaminated site is assessed to present a risk
to the groundwater resources if the groundwater quality criterion is not satisfied at distance equal to 1 year's
groundwater flow. If the groundwater velocity is more than 100 m/yr. then the groundwater criterion must be
met at a maximum of 100 m down gradient.

1.2  The Soil Contamination Act
The aim of the  Soil Contamination Act is to simplify legislation in this field, by consolidating all regulations
on contaminated soil which are presently given in the Environmental Protection Act, the Waste Deposits Act
and the Loss-of-Value Act, in one new act on contaminated soil.

Legal practice  in particular shows that the Environmental Protection Act and the Waste Deposits Act do not
give the authorities the power required to safeguard the "polluter pays principle". A number of the key powers
to issue orders  or enforcement notices are often insufficient, since they are based on situations where it can be
substantiated that the  party to whom the enforcement notice is served, acted negligently and, further, had an
actual right to dispose of the property to which the notice applies.

This legal vacuum will now be filled with the introduction of the provisions of the Soil Contamination Act,
the  main elements of which are:
• new system for mapping of contaminated sites
• permission to change land use, allowing mapping of property solely on the basis of suspected pollution, and
  knowledge  that polluting activities may have  taken place on the property
•  significant change and re-prioritisation of public investigations and remedial measures
•  significantly strengthened rules on notices of enforcement
• new rules on disposal and use of soil.

The provisions of the Loss-of-Value Act are earned on in the  Soil Contamination Act. The Bill, if adopted,
will take effect on January 1, 2000.

                                             107

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)              September 1999


1.3. Mapping of pollution
In accordance with the Soil Contamination Act the regional authorities will in the future co-operate with the
local councils in the mapping of contaminated sites. Mapping will take place no matter when the pollution took
place, and no matter whether it is a point source, e.g. storage tank, or a non-point source, e.g. emissions from
industry.

A site is registered on mapping level 1, if actual knowledge is available on activities on the site or activities
on other sites which may have been the source of pollution on the site.

A site is register at level 2 if documentation is available allowing us to establish with a high degree of certainty
that the site is polluted with substances of a nature and a concentration causing the pollution to be harmful to
Man and the environment.

Thus, in the future, sites may be registered on the basis of suspected pollution, contrary to the current Waste
Deposits Act and  accompanying legislation on registration.

Owners of sites mapped on level 1 or 2 are subjected to a number of restrictions on land use. or users of certain
mapped areas (important groundwater areas, residential areas, kindergartens, recreational areas, public areas
etc.) must before  initiating building or construction work on the site file an application with the regional
council. A permit  will often be given on the condition that the owner or user carries out the required pollution
investigations on  his own account. On the  other hand building or construction permits are not required for
mapped industrial sites, if the use of the site is not changed. However, the municipal authorities must be
notified if soil  is removed from the site.

1.4 More stringent rules of enforcement
The Soil Contamination Act provides for a number of significantly strengthened enforcement powers, basically
only to be applied in relation to pollution occurring after the entry into force of the Act on January 1, 2000.

The Act also empowers the authorities to order investigations, and notices of enforcement to this effect may
be served "irrespective of the time the pollution took place", thus also with retrospective application.

The Act empowers the authorities to issue notices of enforcement, no matter how the pollution occurred, and,
thus, also when the party to whom the enforcement notice is  served acted negligently or by default, thus
causing pollution. Exempt from this rule is, however, pollution caused by war, civil unrest, catastrophes of
nature etc.

Under the Bill notice of enforcement may, where several  polluters are involved, be served to all the parties,
based on estimates of their contribution to the pollution. In the future enforcement notices may also be served,
no matter whether the polluter still has the right to dispose of the property, provided he had the right to dispose
of the property at the time the Bill was presented or later. Moreover, subsequent owners/users must accept
investigations, clean-up  actions etc. on the  site.

Finally, under the Bill (prenotified) enforcement notices may under certain conditions succeed to subsequent
operators.

As regards owners of oil tanks with a capacity below 6,000 litres, used for domestic heating, enforcement
notices may be served, ordering them to carry out investigations or remedial measures,  no matter whether
pollution was caused by negligence on their part. These more strict rules  on the responsibility of owners of
private oil tanks will be combined with a compulsory insurance programme.
                                              108

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)              September 1999

2. REGISTRATION OF CONTAMINATED SITES

At present, approximately 40,000 sites in Denmark are potentially contaminated, of these 14,000 sites are
estimated to be contaminated and an additional 200 km' is estimated to be diffusely contaminated (not
including pollution near roads, originating from pollution from traffic).

The last status (published in 1998, data from 1997) on contaminated sites according to the Waste Deposits Act
shows mat the total number of registered sites was 4,048.

407 new contaminated sites were registered due to field investigations and 98 sites were de-registered due to
clean-up activities.

3. TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME

This part will to some extent cover the Research and Development activities too.

The background and strategies forme development scheme are described in the "Programme for Development
of Technology, Soil and Ground water Contamination, December 1996\ According to plans it will be available
on the Ministry's home page in 1999, at the address: Http://www.mem.dk The programme is also described
in the final report from NATO CCMS meeting in Vienna, Austria 1998.

The main aim of the programme is to develop and implement technologies in order to make the clean-up
measures more effective at reduced costs.

The Programme for Development of Technology, Soil and Groundwater Contamination is focusing on the
following areas of efforts over the next 2-5 years:

1.  Soil and/or groundwater contaminated with chlorinated solvents.
2.  Soil contaminated with heavy metals.
3.  Soil and groundwater contaminated with oil/petrol.
4.  Soil contaminated with tar/PAH.
5.  Composite contamination.
6.  Landfills and leakage of landfill gas.

In 1998 a total amount of DKK 19 million was allocated to the programme.

The Technology Programme for 1998-99 will primarily ensure mat methods of remediating contamination mat
threatens the groundwater are tested and documented. Emphasis should be on contamination with chlorinated
solvents and oil/petrol (areas of effort  1 and 3). Furthermore, but to a lesser extent, methods should be tested
for remediating soil contaminated with metals (area of effort 2).

3.1 Prioritised field projects for 1998-1999
The points are referring to the areas of efforts, and the following methods or technologies are applied on field
projects:
1.  Chlorinated solvents
•  Dual-phase extraction
•  Thermally-assisted remediation
•  Modified stripping methods, e.g. well venting and in well stripping
•  Natural degradation of chlorinated solvents
•  Air sparging
                                            109

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)             September 1999

2.   Soil contaminated with heavy metals
•  Soil washing
•  Electrokinetics
•  Phyto-remediation

3.   Soil contaminated with oil/petrol
•  ORC (Oxygen Release Compound)
•  Geo-oxidation
•  Natural degradation of soil contaminated with petrol/oil

3.2 Studies (elucidation projects)
A number of studies are being planned to start in the period 1998-99. Below is a list of some of the expected
studies. In addition, other studies may be carried out if the relevant applications are submitted.

The list includes  among others:
•  Computer models
•  Composite contamination
•  Soil contaminated with tar/PAH
•  Hydraulic and pneumatic fracturing

3.3 Other projects on soil contamination
Below is part of a list of projects which the Danish Environmental Protection Agency is planning to launch.
Many of the projects are initiated in order to improve the risk assessment work. The projects are:
•  Methods to determine the longitudinal dispersion of the unsaturated zone.
•  Development  of standards for monitoring contamination of groundwater from down-current point sources.
•  Assessment of the pore-water concentration,  calculated  on the basis of the fugacity principle, by
   comparisons of flushing tests on selected inorganic substances.
•  Development of methods to determine the source-strength concentration (pore-water concentration) by
   talcing soil samples.
•  Spread sheet for risk assessment of contamination of soil and groundwater.
•  Risk analysis  of gasses at landfills.
•  Development of methods to measure  the effect of contaminated soil and ground water on the indoor climate

4. REMEDIAL  METHODS IN USE

The description in the Tour de Table Presentation from 1998 still covers the range of remedial methods, and
the general picture has not changed.

5. CONCLUSIONS

At this point the guidelines mentioned above are implemented.

Hopefully, the Bill on Soil Contamination will be adopted by Parliament in 1999, and enter into force in 2000.

The Programme for Development of Technology is in progress and is adding new and useful knowledge in
the area of contaminated soil.
                                             110

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)             September 1999


                                            FRANCE

1. LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUES

a) Background information on Legal and Legislative action

It may be considered that the French policy in matter of polluted land has been defined in its general features
and objectives by the December 3rd 1996 circular letter of the Minister of the Environment. This policy can
be characterized by a will of efficiency and realism. The circular letter includes a paragraph entitled :  "The
principles of a realistic policy for the treatment of polluted sites and soils", in which it is written that" ...it is
a long term action, to the scale of the century and half of industrial history of our country. The development
of this policy can only be progressive and according to the public and private means that will be possible to
mobilize...".

Another aspect of this policy is the principle of dialogue, also mentioned in the circular letter of December
1993. This principle is put in practice between the Ministry of the Environment and the different actors that
take part in the management of polluted sites : governmental agencies  (ADEME, Water Agencies), industrial
operators of potentially polluting installations,  associations for the protection of the environment, experts,
consultants and enterprises specialized in evaluation and treatment of polluted land and, in the case of pollution
related to domestic waste. Municipalities and Territorial Institutions. This dialogue occurs in many occasions,
specially in the national working groups that discuss the projects of methodological guides prepared by the
Ministry of the Environment, before these guides are issued as references for technical regulations.

b) Summary of Legislation

In the case of polluted sites, the basic legal reference is the law of July 19th 1976 on the Installations
Registered for the  Purpose of Environmental Protection (Installations Classees pour la Protection  de
I'Environnement: 1C Law) which covers all environmental aspects of industrial activities (including waste
management and treatment or disposal).  According to this law  industrial installations have to be either
authorized (if they have potentially a strong environmental impact) or declared (if they have potentially a little
environmental impact). Another basic reference which may be applied in the case of pollution of land is the
law  of  July 15th 1975  on elimination  of waste  and recovery  materials (Elimination des Dechets et
Recuperation des Materiels : Waste Law). Additional laws, improving the management of the environment,
complete the I.C. and waste laws :

>  Law of July 13th 1992 created a new policy for the management of domestic wastes including :

•   the progressive banishment of direct landfilling of waste within a time limit often years,
•   the institution of a tax on the direct landfilling of domestic waste,
•   a specific section on the selling  of industrial land, where installations regulated  by the 1C Law have been
    operated, that oblige the vendor to inform the purchaser of the possibility of the pollution of the  considered
    land. In this situation the purchaser has the possibility to cancel or to renegociate the sale.

>  Law of February 2nd  1995 regulated the procedures in the case  of "orphan" polluted sites and finance
    this action by the extension of the waste tax (law of July 1992)  to special (polluting) industrial waste
    treated or disposed in collective installations.

>  Law of Dec. 31 1998 (finance law) that creates a new general tax on polluting activities (TGAP). This tax
    replaces differents previously existing taxes and is applied on air pollution, noise, used oils, treatment /
    disposal of domestic and industrial waste.
                                              Ill

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)              September 1999

In connection to these laws additional legislative decrees and circular letters (directives) have been issued,
mainly:

•   decree of Sept. 21, 1977 that defines the obligations of the operator of an industrial installation in the case
    of cessation of activity

•   circular letter of Dec. 3,  1993 defining the policy for polluted sites

•   circular letters of Apr. 3 and 18, 1996 requiring the realization of preliminary diagnostic and simplified
    risk assessment for active industrial sites

•   circular letter  of June 7, 1996, describing the procedure to be  carried out to apply the polluter pays
    principle.

•   circular letter of sept.  1 1997 indicating the possibilities to imply the owner of the polluted site.

c) The concept of polluted sites

At the origin, in 1978 and during the eighties problems of polluted sites and soils were systematically related
with problems of wastes.

A wider concept of pollution of land designated by "polluted sites and soils" was introduced at the beginning
of the nineties. Accordingly, on December 3rd 1993, the circular letter dealing with the "policy of rehabilitation
and treatment of polluted sites and soils" was issued by the Minister of the Environment and garnered the main
elements of a new  policy for the subject encompassing :

•   a systematic registration of potentially polluted sites
•   a concerted definition of priorities
•   the treatment of every polluted site according to its impact and the use of the land.

At the present time, the definition of a polluted site is : site generating a risk, either actual or potential, for
human health or the environment related to the pollution of one of the medias, resulting of past or present
activities.

Practically, polluted sites are industrial sites, active or inactive, waste sites, accidental pollution sites.

d) Administrative aspects

Although there is a recent tendency towards some regionalization, France remains a centralized country. For
the environment, like for other subjects, laws are discussed and voted by the parliament and regulations are
enacted by the Government and have a national validity. At the central level, the Ministry of the Environment
is responsible for the management of the environmental policy. More precisely, inside the Ministry of the
Environment, the Department in charge of industrial pollution and waste management, including the problem
of polluted  sites is the  Direction of Prevention of Pollution and Risks (Direction de la Prevention des
Pollutions et des Risques :  DPPR). At the local  level the basic geographical administrative unit is the
department  (there  are 99 departments in the country), and in  every department, the Prefect, who is the
representative of the government, is responsible for the implementation of the regulations, hi the particular case
of polluted sites, for which, the basic framework law is the Law on Registred Installations (1C Law, mentioned
above in b). The Prefect is assisted by the Inspectors of the Registred Installations who control industrial
activities (including waste management and disposal) and who are in almost all cases members of the Regional
Direction of Industry, Research and Environment (Directions Reconciles de ['Industrie, de la Recherche et
de I'Environnement: DRIRE).
                                              112

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)              September 1999

Basically the legal and administrative action is  based on the polluter pays principle, the polluter being,
according to the 1C Law, the operator of the installation at the origin of the pollution.

The circular letter of the Minister of the Environment of June 7th 1996 gives a detailed definition of the
procedure to be carried out by the authoritied to manage the suspected or proven contaminated sites according
to the polluter pays principle and, in case of unsuccess, to deal with the orphan sites. This procedure may be
explained as follows : in the case a registred installation is suspected to be responsible of land pollution, the
Prefect may require the operator, according to the  1C Law (section 23), to carry out the actions (investigations
or clean up) requested by the Inspectorate of Registered Installations (Inspection des Installations Classees}.
If the operator don't comply with the order, the Inspector of the Registred Installations writes to the Prefect a
report assessing this non execution. In this situation, the Prefect may require the operator to deposit to a public
accountant a sum representing the estimated cost of the requested work. If this procedure does not succeed,
most of time because  of insolvency of the  operator, the public accountant states the  insolvency of the
responsible party to the Prefect who will then send the file of the considered case to the Ministry of the
Environment, requiring the site to be considered as "orphan". If the Ministry agrees, the case is presented to
the specific National Commission of the Agency of the Environment and Energy Management (ADEME) to
be financed by public funding (TGAP). Then, if the case is accepted by the Committee, the Prefect is allowed
to issue an order asking ADEME to carry out the requested investigations or clean up. After the requested
actions have been carried out ADEME has to initiate lawsuits against potential responsible parties in order to
try to get the reimbursement of the public money spent for the case.

The position of the authorities concerning the owner of a polluted site is a subject of active discussion. Some
years ago, the position  of the Ministry of the environment was rather to consider the owner as a  responsible
of second row and generally no action was initiated against him. Now this  position has changed and the
Ministry may require the prefect (circular letter of sept 1. 1997), in the case of unsecess of the action against
the operator of the installation, to engage administrative action against the  owner.  However the existing
jurisprudence is rather controversial and the legal validity new position of the Ministry is not proven.

e) Summary of policy developments

As it has been explained above the French approach to deal with polluted sites is basically connected with the
legislation on the environmental management of industrial installations (1C Law) and to a more limited degree
to the management of waste (waste law).

This means that these  is no specific legislation  relative to soil protection or polluted sites.  Although the
development of such legislation has been already considered, it seems that it will probably not happen in the
short or middle term and that the existing approach will continue.

hi this view the existing laws (1C Law) will be applied and completed by technical directives (circular letters)
issued by the Ministry of the  Environment to organise the management  of polluted sites, these technical
directives are related to technical guides developed at the present time.

A first technical guide has been  issued in 1996 (draft 0) and 1997 (draft  1) to organise the preliminary
evaluation and priority  ranking of suspected polluted sites. The proposed preliminary evaluation includes two
steps :

>  Step A : which is a documentary study (a historical review and a vulnerability study) based on available
    and accessible date, and is completed with a site visit. The historical review includes a description of the
    sequences of activities that have taken place in  the course of time, their precise locations and any
    associated environmental practices that may have been carried out. The vulnerability study  includes an
    investigation of the parameters (geology, etc.) mat could have relevance for the fate and transport of the
    contaminants and the potential targets (housing, drinking water supply etc.) likely to be affected.
                                              113

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)              September 1999

    During the site visit the data deriving from the documentation study should be verified and additional data
    acquired. An evaluation and identification of existing and potential impacts takes place and a further
    investigation programme is prepared.

>  Step B and the simplifies risk assessment (SRA) includes the collection of data that have not been available
    within the previous study but are conditional for the simplified risk assessment. The SRA demands an
    understanding of the contamination's spatial distribution and transport mechanisms, the identification of
    possible hazards and the description of possible rehabilitation methods. At this stage it is necessary to
    develop some field investigation in order to acquire the data that make this understanding possible.

>  Simplified Risk Assessment (SRA) ; based on the results of the preliminary evaluation a simplified risk
    assessment is conducted according to a scoring system :  the site in question is classified in one of 3 groups:

•   sites needing further investigation and detailed risk assessment
•   sites for which monitoring systems  should be applied
•   sites mat can be used for specific purposes without further investigations or implementation of measures

The decision making process within the SRA is supported by defined guideline values.

At the present time, an other methodological guide is in preparation, under the responsibility of the Ministry
of the Environment, in cooperation with a national working group. This guide will define the objectives and
contents of the impact study (detailed investigations) and detailed risk assessment.

For the sites where the preliminary diagnostic concludes that the pollution and risks are serious, the realization
of the impact study and risk assessment will give the basis to determine the rehabilitation objectives and to
select the remedial options.

2. REGISTRATION OF CONTAMINATED SITES

Although France was probably one of the first countries to  carry out some kind of inventory of polluted sites
in 1978, limited attention has been given to the problems of land pollution until the beginning of the nineties.

National register

At the national level, since 1993,  a national register is managed by the Ministry of the Environment (DPPR).
In this register are gathered the sites that are known by the local authorities and can be considered as polluted.

These sites are listed in a computerized databank and reports are periodically issued by the Ministry to inform
the public of the  situation. A publication of mis register was issued in Dec. 1994, gathering 669 sites an other
one based on the situation of Dec. 1996 was issued in Dec. 1997, with 896 polluted sites plus 125 sites already
restored without any limitation of use.

Inventories

In addition to this registration system are actions of inventory carried out through two specific ways:

a) The historical inventories, initiated at the regional level, based of the consideration of local industrial
history in order to discover,  in connection with the existence of past polluting industrial activities, the places
where pollution can be suspected. These inventories are mainly based on the consideration of the archives and
indicate suspected sites (or potentially  polluted sites). At  the present  time (end of 1998) about half of the
departments located in 17 regions have initiated  such inventories. It is expected that about 200 000 to 300 000
suspected locations will be collected at the end of these studies forme whole national territory among which
some thousands will require corrective action.

                                             114

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)              September 1999

b) The evaluation of the pollution of active industrial sites (including industrial waste treatment and disposal
sites). In April 1996, the Ministry of the Environment instructed the Prefects of departements to order the
owners of registered installations to cam' out preliminary investigations and simplified risk assessment of their
sites. A preliminary classification of priority activities  to consider in the orders is given in the annexe of the
circular letter. Within 5 years it is previewed that some  1500 to 2000 sites assigned with priority I will be
evaluated.

Estimation of the number of polluted sites

The two previously mentioned actions, historical inventories and evaluation of active industrial sites, are not
enough developed to allow a significant evaluation. The only very approximative estimation possible at the
present time is 200 000 to 300 000 suspected sites and some thousands of cases requiring corrective actions.

3. REMEDIAL METHODS

a) Summary data on remedial technologies used in the country

According to the datas collected in the national register published in Dec. 1997, the techniques used for the
polluted soils in the sites were a rehabilitation project has been carried out can be listed as follows :

•   Landfilling :                44
•   On site isolation :           60
•   Stabilization :               12
•   Natural attenuation :         15
•   Biotreatment:              29
•   Soil washing :              10
•   Thermal/incineration        29
•   Other:                     33

In more than on third of these cases, a combination of techniques has been used.

b) Policy initiative and other factors influencing the use of remedial methods

For the first cases of rehabilitation  during the eighties  and in the beginning of the nineties, most of the
techniques used were isolation and treatment or disposal in the installations of the waste system.

It appeared soon mat waste treatment plants (incineration) were often technically inappropriate and very
expensive and, because of recent regulations, inducing  restrictions of use and technical contraints, landfilling
has become more and more difficult and costly.

These circunstances create a positive evolution for the use of specific soil treatment techniques.

c) Methods used for remediation

Isolation remains one of the most frequently used technique, mainly in cases where no treatment technique can
be technically or economically applied.

The techniques that have  been and are  still the most frequently used to clean soils  are microbiological
degradation and soil venting.

Biodegradation is most of the  time carried out on site by the mean of composting or bio-piles. Contaminants
degraded are petroleum compounds, light and heavy oils and even polyaromatic hydrocarbons. Soil venting
addresses volatils hydrocarbons and chlorinated solvents in the unsaturated zone. It is sometimes associated

                                             115

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)             September 1999

with in situ biodegradation (bio-venting). To depolute the satured levels (ground-water) venting is combined
with air sparging.

More recently, new treatment capabilities have been made available either by specific own development or by
technology transfer. The techniques concerned are soil washing (solvent washing) and thermal desorption.

At the present time, five thermal treatment installations  with various level of performance  (quantity and
complexity of pollution that  can be treated) have been made available in France

4. RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION

a) Summery of government supported R & D

The support of R & D by the Government is mainly provided by the Ministry of the Environment and the
Ministry of Research and Education through shree different ways:

>  Ministry of the Environment, Section in charge of Research and Economic Affair (SRAE) mat develops
    research programs focusing on behaviour of contaminants in regard of risks and possibilities of treatment

>  Ministry  of the Environment, Section in charge of Industrial Environment (SEI) that develops  the
    methodological guidance documents to be used in connection with regulations

>  Agency of the Environment and Energy Management (ADEME) in charge of evaluation and rehabilitation
    of orphans polluted sites  that develops specific research programs to improve the basis of decision making
    procedures and to optimise the choice of remedial techniques and the control of their efficiency.

The total amount of funds made available through these three actions is about 12 Millions FF/year.

Concerning the development of rehabilitation techniques some public money is supplied  by the Ministries of
Research an of Industry through funds to help technical  innovation and international cooperation (EUREKA
projects)

In addition to governmental  funding, some support to R & D projects are  also provided by Regions most of
the time in connection with the economical redevelopment of brownfields (North or Lorraine Regions).

b) Private R & D programs

In addition to research programs financed by publics funds, some enterprises develop specific R & D activities.
These enterprises can be gathered into two categories:

>  Enterprises responsible of polluted sites that are looking for optimization (technical  and economical) of
    the management of these sites: atypical example of such enterprises is Gaz de France that is in charge of
    about  450 gaswork sites

>  Enterprises that are active in evaluation and/or clean up of polluted sites and mat try to improve their know
    how.
                                            116

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)             September 1999

c) Perspectives

According the present time it may be estimated that the R & D programs will be mainly oriented in two
directions:

•   increase the efficiency of the management of the suspected and provens polluted sites by the preparation
    of technical guidance documents associated with the development of specific tools to improve the decision
    making procedures

•   develop more economical and efficient equipments and processes to caracterise and to treat the pollution.

Considering the treatment techniques, two possibilities are simultaneously developed:

•   improvement of existing techniques: a typical example is bioremediation with many projects trying to
    extend its application to recalcitrant pollutants (PAH, PCB...)

•   development of new treatnent techniques: reactive walls, supercritical extraction, electromigration...
                                             117

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)              September 1999


                                          GERMANY

1. LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUES

The enforcement of the contaminated site remediation which generally includes the steps registration, risk
assessment and remediation is with the 16 Federal States (Lander) of Germany. Together with the Lander
regulation more than 35 lists exist all over the country containing different values for risk assessment and clean
up. In order to harmonize regulations and values the Federal Government submitted the Federal Soil Protection
Act (FSPA) which has been enacted on March 1st, 1999. The accompanying sublegal regulations which have
been submitted later on by the Federal Government have been passed the Federal Council (Parliament of the
Lander) on April 30th, 1999 with some changes and supplements. It can be expected that the Ordinance on
Soil Protection and Contaminated Sites will come into force in July 1999 after the agreement by the Federal
Government.

The FSPA includes precaution issues as well as remediation of contaminated soils and sites. The main purpose
of the FSPA is to protect against harmful changes in the soil. Harmful changes in the soil exist when the soil
functions are impaired and when this leads to danger, to considerable adversely affects for the individual or
for the general public. The definition of the FSPA includes natural soil functions and functions of the soil
utilization.

The two terms harmful changes in the soil and contaminated sites in the FSPA cover all burdens of the soil
which cause hazards for human beings and the environment. Contaminated sites (CS) are defined as sites mat
cause harmful changes in the soil or other hazards for the individual or for the general public and meet one of
the following criteria:

•  closed-down waste disposal facilities or other estates on which wastes have been treated, stored or disposed
   (abandoned waste disposal sites - AWDS) and

•  estates of closed-down facilities and other estates on which environmentally hazardous substances have
   been handled (abandoned industrial sites - AIS),

Sites that are suspected to be contaminated (SCS) are by definition of this law AWDS and AIS, which are
suspicious for harmful changes in the soil or other hazards for the individual or the general public.

Following regulations for the remediation of contaminated sites are a substantial part of the FSPA:

•  The authorities are responsible for registration, investigation and assessment of SCS,

•  authorities may require under certain conditions remedial investigations and a remedial plan by those who
   are obliged for remediation,

•  the remedial plan should provide in the case of serious and  complex CS transparency and by mat provide
   a substantial contribution to the acceptance of the necessary remedial measures by the affected persons,

•  the remedial plan should cover a summary of the risk assessment and the remedial investigations as well
   as the remedial goals and the remedial measures,

•  by the rule the remedial plan is worked by an expert,

•  in the cases of CS and SCS responsible persons are obliged to announce these sites and to carry out self-
   control measures; the authorities are responsible for the supervision,
                                             118

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)
September 1999
•  together with the remedial plan the obliged person can submit a public contract for the remedial measures,

•  to enhance the approval procedure the official obligation of the remedial plan as well as the official order
   for remediation concentrates all necessary permissions from other laws.

2. REGISTRATION OF CONTAMINATED SITES

The registration of suspected contaminates sites (SCS) which is carried out by the Lander, is focused on the
registration of abandoned waste disposal sites (AWDS) and abandoned industrial sites (AIS). As a result of
a nationwide survey 1998 more man 300,000 SCS were registered excluding military contaminated sites and
former armament production sites. More than 100,000 are AWDS and nearly 200,000 are AIS. Due to the
different definition of suspected contaminated sites in the Lander according to their legal regulations the data
can hardly compared directly.
                                          Table 1:
         Status of inventory suspected contaminated sites in Germany (December 1998)
Federal States
Baden-Wurttemberg
Bavaria
Berlin
Brandenburg
Bremen
Hamburg
Hesse
Mecklenburg Western Pomerania
Lower Saxony
North Rhine-Westphalia
Rhineland-Palatinate
Saarland
Saxony
Saxony-Anhalt
Schleswig-Holstein
Thuringia
Germany total
Registered suspected contaminated sites
abandoned waste
disposal sites
(AWDS)
15.074
9.725
673
5.585
105
460
6.502
4.113
8.957
17.155
10.578
1.801
9.382
6.936
3.076
6.192
106.314
abandoned
industrial sites
(AIS)
27.487
3.194
5.541
8.580
4.000
1.701
60.372
7.231
k. A.
14.874
k.A.
2.442
22.197
13.295
14.497
12.368
197.779
sites in all
(SCS)
42.561
12.919
6.214
14.165
4.105
2.161
66.874
11.344
8.957
32.029
10.578
4.243
31.579
20.231
17.573
18.560
304.093
                                            119

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)
September 1999
3. TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM

According to the definitions of the Federal Soil Protection Act, remediation are measures:

1.  for the removal or reduction of contaminants (decontamination measures),

2.  which prevent or reduce the  spreading out of contaminants on a long-term basis without removing
    contaminants (safeguarding measures).

3.  for the removal or reduction of harmful changes of the physical, chemical and biological nature of the soil.

4.  As a consequence of cost considerations the trend forme remediation of contaminated sites is definitely
    moving towards safeguarding and containment measures or excavation and disposal of contaminated soil.
    As the Lander are responsible for enforcement there are no reliable nation-wide figures  on this issue
    available. However, it can be roughly estimated that almost 50 % of all remediations are executed this way.
    On the other site the level of applicable decontamination techniques in Germany is very high. This is true
    for both, the technological facilities of the plants to clean up also highly contaminated soil as well as the
    capacities  that  are nation-wide  available for the  treatment  of contaminated soil. Regarding the
    decontamination of soil, off-site-treatment in stationary plants is meanwhile the main procedure. Table 2
    provides the capacities of soil treatment plants of 1996 mat have been provided by  4 thermal treatment
    plants, 24 soil washing plants and 81 biological treatment plants.

                        Table 2: Capacities of soil  treatment plants of 1996
Technology
Biological treatment
Soil washing
Thermal treatment
Together
Capacity [t] in 1996
1,897,850
1,382,900
168,000
3,448,750
Soil treated [t] in 19967
average degree of usage
1,243,678/65.5%
854,333/61.8%
109,200/65.0%
2,207,211 (64.0%)
The technology development program, which is mainly funded by the Federal Ministry for Education and
Research (BMBF), is executed by the BMBF  Project Management Agency for Waste Management and
Remediation of Contaminated Sites within the Federal Environmental Agency (DBA). Since the late seventies
nearly 300 Million DM have been spent for technology development in the area of remediation.

In the last few years the technology development program is aimed at cost-effective strategies and technologies.
These are bioremediation of soil, treatment walls  including permeable reactive barrier technologies and natural
attenuation.

The Joint Research Group, "Processes for the Bioremediation of Soil/' comprises seven joint projects with
more than 30 single  projects. This interdisciplinary group is working on the development of innovative
processes for the bioremediation of contaminated soils. After the laboratory phase, not only their effectivity
is tested under application-oriented conditions, but also their success is monitored by a complex control system
                                             120

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)              September 1999

that goes far beyond a conventional chemical analysis of pollutants. A comprehensive handbook ist scheduled
for publication in 1999.

On March  10th, 1999 the BMBF published an announcement  ,,Application of Treatment Walls for the
Remediation of Contaminated Sites". Project proposals for mis new joint project are requested till May 31st
1999.

After initiating R&D-projects on Monitored Natural Attenuation (MNA) as cost-effective possibility for the
clean up of military sites by the UBA on behalf of the Federal Ministry for the Environment (BMU - see
contribution Axel Szelinski on Natural Attenuation in the Federal Republic of Germany, Background, Trends
and Current Situation) the UBA actually is planning to submit the BMBF  a new joint project proposal  on
MNA.

4. CONCLUSIONS

After the recently enacted federal legislation on soil protection and rehabilitation of contaminated sites
Germany enters a new phase in both areas. Experiences with the enforcement  and execution of the Federal Soil
Protection Act have to be gained over the  next few years in order to optimize the federal and Lander
legislation.  Registration of contaminated sites and research and development of remediation technologies are
far advanced.

Besides innovative technologies Germany focuses on the development of new strategies and economic
instruments for the clean up of contaminated sites. Actually the UBA is involved in a couple of national and
international activities on brownfield redevelopment. The UBA has initiated  several R&D-projects on this
issue and currently chairs the working group 1 ..Brownfield Redevelopment" within the Concerted Action
CLARINET funded by the European  Commission. In the framework  of international  activities on the
brownfield redevelopment issue  the UBA prepares a joint German/British project with industry and university
partners to be submitted as a proposal under the 5th Framework Program of the  European Commission.
                                             121

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)              September 1999


                                          HUNGARY

1. LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUES

Economic growth, especially vigorous industrial development, took place in Hungary without the constraints
of strong environmental protection regulations up to the end of the seventies and the beginning of the eighties.
Although  the legal regulations concerning environmental protection later caught up with contemporary
requirements, compliance with the regulations fell far short of the theoretical strictness of the limits and other
regulations for a decade or so. In the midst of the economic difficulties of the time, only insubstantial amounts
could be spent on environmental protection. This situation has led to a gradual accumulation of non-degradable
and slowly degrading pollutants in groundwater and the soil.

There are approximately ten thousand polluted areas in Hungary where cleanup would have been an imperative
for years,  even decades. The environmental protection authorities, local governments, and possibly oilier
organizations have information (which is far from complete) concerning only a fraction of these.

The  government's 1991 short- and medium-term action plan, which  identified the  tasks of surveying,
uncovering, and terminating accumulated environmental pollution, can be considered as the starting point for
the Remediation Program. The same plan deals with solutions to the environmental problems presented by
abandoned Soviet barracks and training grounds.

Owing to the lack of funds, only the latter task could be started before 1995 under the technical direction of
the  Ministry  for Environment and Regional Policy and the Environmental Management Institute. The
remediation of the most polluted of the former Soviet properties will have been completed in 1-2 years.

The experiences obtained in the course of privatization (many foreign investors were concerned about the risk
of "inherited" environmental damage connected to properties), the revival of the real estate market, the
experiences acquired as a result of the upsurge in bankruptcies and liquidation, and, hopefully, the developing
public  participation in  environmental protection all helped provide justification for the  Ministry  for
Environment and Regional Policy's original initiative. Therefore, the government launched the National
Environmental Remediation Program in 1996 in order to assess polluted areas, uncover damage that falls
within the scope of the government's responsibility, and eliminate the damage.

In September, Parliament has approved the National Environmental Program which contains the Remediation
Program.

Legislation
The new environmental protection law stipulates that, if no other person can be made responsible, it is the task
of the  government to  eliminate the consequences  of  significant  environmental damage.Under certain
conditions, the law stipulates the joint and several responsibility of the polluter and the owner of the area in
which the activity causing the pollution is or was pursued. This provision will, in the long run. increase the
chance of having the responsible persons, not the government, pay for eliminating environmental damage.

If, therefore, the polluter
-    is unknown (or if the presumed polluter cannot be proved to be responsible),
     has been terminated without a legal successor, or
     is currently under liquidation and the liquidated assets have been proved to be insufficient for cleaning
     up the damage;
the pollution must be considered a government responsibility and the damage on the given  area must be
eliminated within the framework of the Remediation Program. Naturally, it is also the responsibility of the
government to clean up long-term environmental damage caused by government budget agencies.
                                             122

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)              September 1999

2. REGISTRATION OF  CONTAMINATED SITES

The purpose of the Remediation Program is terminating the harmful and hazardous effect of long-term
environmental pollution mat falls within the scope of the government's responsibility. In order to achieve this,
the first step that needs to be taken is the comprehensive survey of long-term environmental damage (sources
of pollution and polluted areas).  The remediation concept extends over the entire process. As the first step of
the Remediation Program, the environmental protection authorities started to survey the entire country in 1995
for pollution whose cleanup is particularly important. As a result, approximately 200 areas were registered.
It is characteristic of the registered pollution that it endangers 86% of the soil and groundwater and a lesser
degree of the air and surface waters.

Priority
In the course of the  remediation, the optimal solution must be realized in order to protect human health, as well
as the flora and fauna. The requirements of environmental hygiene, therefore, are of primary importance in risk
calculations, while, at the same time, cost efficiency requirements are also built into the evaluations. Current
and planned area use characteristics influence the degree to which soil is cleaned. Groundwater water resources
that are located in the catchment area of mineral, medicinal,  and drinking water bases enjoy priority, regardless
of the type  of water (shallow  groundwater,  karstic water, bank-filtered water,  or deep  groundwater).
Intervention has  a higher priority for water resources that are located in vulnerable geological
environments. The basic requirement of the remediation process is to prevent the spread of the pollution from
one environmental  element to another.

Phases
The first two years of operation (1996 and 1997) can be considered the program's short-term phase.The
development of the research, information technology, regulatory, and monitoring systems started in the period
during which the program was established and its methodology created. The government's responsibility and
participation were clarified. The program's medium-term  phase was  compiled. The process of nationwide
assessment began; and emergency measures, investigations, and cleanup projects were carried out with regard
to individual tasks. The preparation of the related subprograms was in progress in 1997.

The individual remediation tasks entail the investigation and cleanup of pollution for which the government
is responsible in accordance with the schedule determined by the priorities. In the program's medium-term
phase, which period is five years, diagnostic or partial investigations can be carried out in approximately 200
areas, if the program's finances are realized according to the plans.

The need for rapid response  will increase at first. Later, these  interventions will be  less characteristic.
Accordingly, we can anticipate that emergency measure will be needed in approximately 50 cases.

As opposed to this, the annual number of cleanups after fact-finding will gradually increase. It is possible to
estimate approximately 50-80 remediation projects for the period leading up to 2002. In terms of the need for
follow up, mis means that approximately 1000 observation wells (or omer similar facilities) will be established
before 2002 as part of the monitoring system.

Most of the pollution mat falls within the scope of the government's responsibility must be cleaned up within
the  framework of  the subprograms. The individual subprograms are aimed at cleaning up government
properties that are under the management of state holding companies.  Hungarian State Railways Company's
(MAV Rt.) environmental pollution, for example, will be cleaned up and the damage left by state mining
projects will be eliminated within the framework  of such subprograms. Subprograms will be created to
eliminate the environmental damage on military properties and other pollution in areas and properties held by
other ministries or properties in the possession of budget institutions.

According to the  plans, State Privatization  Agency (APV Rt.) will  be in charge  of two specialized
subprograms. APV Rt.'s cleanup tasks are aimed not only at the existing government properties, but at the

                                             123

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)              September 1999

properties that APV Rt. has already sold and on which it has assumed environmental protection guarantees on
the basis of contracts of sale or the law. The government cleanup of former Soviet properties is carried out
within the framework of one of the subprograms. The other subprogram is the so-called corporate privatization
subprogram, which also incorporates environmental protection guarantees that were made mostly on the basis
of individual decisions in the course of sales negotiations.

The implementation  of the coiporate privatization subprogram contributes  to the privatization of some
companies for which investor interest has so far been dampened by the companies" previous environmental
problems and, consequently, the high risk resulting  from the accumulated pollution.

The persons in charge of directing the subprograms use the same investigation, registration, and risk evaluation
methodologies mat determine the order of priorities in individual interventions. The damage investigated in
the various subprograms, therefore, can be compared to the individual cleanup requirements. The schedule,
which is based on a comprehensive calculation of priorities, can be influenced to a certain extent by the
characteristics of the given subprogram (e.g. the manner in which military properties are used), its separate
financial or budgetary position, or the deadlines for other tasks (in the case of APV Rt.).

Subprograms
•  The National Environmental Health Action Plan (NEHAP): Within the frame of the action plan, a database
   on contaminated areas has been established aiming at evaluting environmental hygiene risks and
   considering local characteristics and possibilities. Results obtained from survey areas provide a fairly good
   basis for comprehensive prioritising along the National Remediation Programme.

•  The Clean up programme of the Hungarian railway company (MAV Rt.):  The clean up programme was
   initiated in 1997. All registered contaminated sites of the railway company (railway stations, workshops
   etc.) are incorporated in the KARINFO database of the National remediation Programme.

•  The Mining Structure Conversion Programme (SZESZEK): The programme was started early on basis of
   a  Government decision of 1991. About 1000 sites have been registered within this programme and the
   most critical  sites have already been remediated. The registered sites of this programme are incorporated
   in the KARINFO database of the National Remediation Programme.

•  The Industrial Park Programme: The programme was initiated in  1997 aiming at the reclamation of former
   industrial zones. It is noted mat new industrial parks have also been created by reclamation of old mining
   properties within the above-mentioned mining programme. Available data from the Industrial Park
   Programme on old, contaminated industrial sites will be incorporated in the KARINFO database of the
   National Remediation Programme.

•  The Military Sites Clean up Programme: The programme is based on the work performed during the
   preperation of the framework of the National environmental Remediation Programme. Since 1998. the
   Military Sites Clean up Programme has been financed by the budget of the Ministry of Defence.

•  The Governmental Property Privatisation Agency (APV Rt.): Recently, the programme of the privatisation
   agency has been developed in different fields covering the rest of former Soviet military properties.

3. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES

The Remediation Program is coordinated by the Ministry for the Environment with the participation of the
ministries and professional and  scientific organizations  concerned.  The program  is  operated by the
Remediation Program Office, which was developed within the Institute for Environmental Development, with
the participation of the environmental protection authorities. The office's  activities are supervised by the
assistant undersecretary of state for the Ministry for the Environment. A team of professionals assigned by the
various departments of the ministry assist the assistant undersecretary of state in his duties.

                                            124

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)             September 1999

The Ministry for the Environment makes regular reports to the Government concerning the program and the
manner in which it is being implemented.

Research
Some university institutes were also involved. Technical University of Budapest cooperation with Florida State
University had  finished a research project  on "  Monitoring Soil Phytoremediation by  Chlorophyll
Fluorescence".

Measurement of chlorophyll fluorescence induction kinetics was carried out during a phytoremediation
technology field experiment in order to monitor heavy metal uptake from contamination soil. A new portable
chlorophyll fluorometer was used to identify the most applicable parameter to monitor the process. Good
correlation was demonstrated between this parameter and accumulated heavy metal concentration.Application
of the monitoring technique for the technology optimization is proposed.

This project is going to announce as a pilot study.

Implementation of Limit Values
The Hungarian environmental regulations have to be adjusted gradually to the EU standards. Recently, the
Ministry for Environment and Regional Policy has prepared a legislation draft, which contains the provision
of the groundwater_ directive (80/68/EEC). Among others, it deals indirectly with discharge of contaminants
into the groundwater, and in this respect, it also gives some provision  about soil protection. It is a demand in
Hungary to regulate the standards for proper groundwater quality.

The proposed Hungarian legislation includes the set up of a system of limit values for soil and groundwater:
A: Background values
B: Threshold values of contamination
C: Threshold values of measures
D: Targer values

The complete system of limit values was proposed by an expert group considering the values found in the
Dutch and German lists as well as Canadian values and guidelines issued by the US EPA. It is noted that the
threshold values and the targer values differ depending on the vulnerability of the aquifers.

Previously, for the most urgent clean-up measures the National Standards for agricultural soils were applied,
which are, however, inherently conservative. The ABC values of the Dutch Standards have partly been applied
for other clean-up activities, hi many cases, the A values of the  Dutch standards were not applicable due to
the high clean-up costs infolved. Until the new  legislation comes into force the Regional Environmental
Inspectorates define clean-up criteria on a case-by-case basis.

4. CONCLUSIONS

The process of establishing national-wide inventory of pollution sources and contaminated sites has been
initiated. The regional environmental inspectorates have filled in questionnaries distributed by the Remediation
Programme Office.

hi the framework of the National Environmental Remediation Program a preliminary database containing 173
contaminated sites has been set up. Investigations of soil and groundwater have been made at 23 of these. The
expected distribution of type of contaminanants at the sites: 45 % of heavy metals. 20 % of hydrocarbons, 10
% of pesticides, 15 % others, 10 % non identied. hi 1996. the Remediation Program Office announced open
tenders for the diagnostic investigation of 15 areas and separate tenders for emergency measure in the case of
eight of these areas. Nearly one hundred offers were received for the public procurement announcements.
                                             125

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)              September 1999

The emergency measure were, with two exceptions, completed by the end of 1996, while the Remediation
Program Office concluded contracts with the winners that bid forme diagnostic investigations at the beginning
of 1997. Most of the investigations were completed by 1997.

In summary, the Ministry for Environment and Regional Policy's remediation project was launched in 17 areas
in the second half of 1997. Investigations will begin in nine of these areas, and emergency measure is necessary
in four areas. With four exceptions, the remediation projects begun in the previous year are continuing with
detailed investigation of the work, supplementary emergency measure, and/or cleanup.

Along the National Environmental Program total clean up costs for all contaminated sites of concern have been
estimated to exceed 1 billion US$. In the first 2 years of the remediation program, annual budgets were about
7 million US$. For the year 1999. the same amount would be financed by the central budgets.
                                             126

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)             September 1999


                                             JAPAN

1. INTRODUCTION

The PCDD/PCDFs (dioxiii) pollution has become the serious social problem in Japan. Extremely high
concentrations of dioxin have been detected around the municipal waste incinerators. The waste incineration
facilities are thought to the main source of the dioxin emissions (Table 1). The dioxin emissions from the
incineration facilities for both municipal and industrial wastes comprise about 90% of the total dioxin emission
in Japan.

                         Table 1. Inventory of dioxin emissions in Japan
Municipal waste incineration
Industrial waste incineration
Smelter
Petroleum additives (lubricating oils)
Cigarette smoke
Kraft recovery boiler
Lumber and lumber waste incineration
Exhaust gas from automobiles
Bleached Kraft pulp
Agrochemical manufacturing process (PCNB)
Total
4,300 g/year
547-707 g/year
250 g/year
20 g/year
16 g/year
3 g/year
0.2 g/year
0.07 g/year
0.7 g/year
0.06 g/year
5, 104 -5, 3 00 g/year
2. NOSE TOWN CASE

In April of 1998, a serious case of the dioxin-contaminated  soil in Nose Town, Osaka prefecture, got
nationwide news coverage in Japan.

First, the nationwide surveillance of dioxin in off-gases from municipal waste incineration facilities revealed
the high concentration of dioxin (150 ng-TEQ/NmJ) in Nose Town. Because this level exceeded the interim
emissions standard of 80 ng-TEQ/Nm3 (Table 2), the residents requested that the incineration facility in Nose
Town should cease operations and that a  soil investigation  around the incineration  facility should be
performed. As a result, the maximum concentration of dioxins detected in the soil around the incineration
facility and in the bottom sediment of the pond close to the incineration facility was 8,500 ng-TEQ/kg and
23,000 ng-TEQ/kg, respectively. Since extremely high contamination  of dioxins in the soil and bottom
sediment was observed, the facility was investigated in detail. This investigation resulted  in the discovery of
several unexpected mechanisms of dioxin contamination. There are several factors for this. The design of this
facility (Figure 1), in which scrubber water had been used to decrease the temperature of exhaust gas and the
electrostatic precipitator. was unique. Operation and maintenance of the facility were also deficient because
the amount of municipal wastes accepted exceeded the planned  capacity. Since this incinerator had often
burned incompletely, it generated unburned carbons and precursors of dioxins. Furthermore the temperature
of the exhaust gas getting into the electrostatic precipitator was about 300 C which is very suitable temperature
for de-novo synthesis of dioxin. The generated dioxins were concentrated in the scrub unit and some of them
accidentally transferred to the cooling unit and diffused to the surrounding area from the  cooling tower as a
mist. The soil under the cooling water tank was contaminated by the cooling water overflowed. The dioxin
concentrations in the soil and the cooling water, in fact, were 52,000,000 ng-TEQ/kg and 3,000,000 ng-TEQ/1,
respectively.
                                             127

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)              September 1999

There is no residential housing is within a 500-meter radius of the incineration facility.  However, the
agricultural high school, which is near the incineration facility, has been closed prior to the completion of the
soil remediation project. More detailed investigation showed that dioxin concentrations in soils decreased as
the increase of distance from the incineration facility and that the patterns of congeners of dioxins were similar.
The municipality estimated that the contaminated area is 20.000 m2 and comprises 4,000 tons of contaminated
soil.

3. GUIDELINE VALUE FOR DIOXIN-CONTAMINATED SOIL

The dioxin-contaminated  soil has become a serious social problem after the Nose Town incident made the
headlines in the newspapers. Japan's Environment Agency organized an expert committee addressing dioxin-
contaminated soils in 1998. The expert committee proposed the action level of dioxin in soil at  1.000 pg-
TEQ/g (i.e., an intervention value) in residential areas.

In establishing the guideline value, four exposure pathways (Figure 2). i.e.. direct ingestion of soil, dermal
absorption from soil in direct contact with  skin, inhalation of soil particle, and inhalation of dioxin vapor
volatilized from soil, were taken into consideration. The value 4 pg-TEQ/kg BW/day was adopted as Tolerable
Daily Intake (TDI) value. The Ministry of Health and Welfare estimated that the uptake rate of dioxins through
the exposure pathways from foods such as fish and meat and air is 2.58 pg-TEQ/kg BW/day. The expert
committee evaluated the soil exposure pathway and determined a range of 0.11 to 0.97 pg-TEQ/kg BW/day
if the dioxin concentration in soil is  1,000 pg-TEQ/g.

4. TECHNICAL SUPPORT FOR REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT

The bench-scale remediation projects for the dioxin-contaminated soil were conducted in 1998  using the
dioxin-contaminated soil from Nose Town. In 1999, based on the result of the bench scale test,  full-scale
demonstrations will be performed.

Based on the monitoring data from the other sites, a comprehensive manual about  surveillance and remediation
of the dioxin-contaminated soil  will be published to support the  remedial action by the polluters.

5. FUTURE WORKS

Two major areas need further investigation - dioxin standards in  the farmland and in children's playgrounds.

The surveillance of nationwide dioxin concentrations in farmland and agricultural products (i.e., vegetables
and fruits) harvested from the farmland is  ongoing. Based on these analytical results, a determination on
whether or not a farmland standard should be established will be addressed. Some researchers point out that
large amounts of dioxin have already accumulated in farmland due to application of pesticides and herbicides
such as pentachlorophenol (PCP)  and  CNP (chlornitrofen,  4-nitrophenyl 2,4,6-trichlorophenyl  ether)
containing dioxins. Although it is expected that vegetables and other crops do not easily absorb dioxins in soil,
there are data addressing the dioxin concentration in the farmland areas in Japan.

Many people have requested mat a standard in the soil of children's playgrounds be adopted. Germany has
already established a standard value of 100 pg-TEQ/g in children's playgrounds.

There is the problem indigenous to Japan - eating lots offish and shellfish. The most effective measure to
decrease dioxin uptake would be to decrease the amount of dioxin in fish in Japan. The amount of dioxin
uptake from fish comprises about 50% of TDI. Bottom sediments are considered to be responsible for the
dioxins in fish and shellfish. And dioxin-contaminated soils in residential and farmland areas contribute run-
off, which is deposited in rivers, lakes,  and coastal areas. It is very important to make clear this long chain
pathway from soils to fish.
                                             128

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)
                                        September 1999
The latest news is the enactment of the dioxin law on July 12, 1999. Based on the dioxin law, new air, soil,
and water quality standards addressing dioxin contamination will be established within six months.

                       Table 2: "Present" National Regulations for Dioxins
TDI        10 pg-TEQ/kgB W/d      Ministry of Health & Welfare
            5 pg-TEQ/kgBW/d       Environment Agency
            1.4 pg-TDI/kgBW/d      WHO
•   Guideline for ambient air quality: 0.8 pg-TWEQ/mJ
•   Guideline for soil in residential area:  1,000 pg-TEQ/g
•   Emission control for off-gas from wasrte incineration plants
•   Potential treatment capability   Dioxin cone. (ngTEQ/m3
            (ton/h)
              >4
              2.4
              <2
New facility
    0.1
     1
     5
Interim regulations for old facilities until 2002:  80 ngTEQ/mJ
Old facility
     1
     5
    10
(after 2002)
                       Figure 1. The design of the incinerator in Nose Town
                                                                              o

                                                                              0
                          Construction and dioxin
                                   ...       .  ....
                     concentration of incinerator facility
                                                      Scrubber if
                                                            ^=i
                                                         ooling gunil
                                                                          Cooling
                                                                          water
                                                                          tank
                          Exhaust gas  ^^- Scrub water      Cooling water
                                                                      52,000
                                             129

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)
September 1999
               Figure 2: Exposure Pathway from Dioxin-contaminated Soil

s
0
I
L


vaporization
blown-up
absorption ^
adherence





inhalation ^

direct ingestion ^
depositior
r
r
run-off surface
water

seepage ground
filtration water

dermal absorption


milk,
meat
vegetable
bioconcentration


i



* 	 >
fjch


via fooc
	 .

drinking
water
!•••••• ^^»
1

^™ ^^m ^^^^~
^^^ • ^^^^^-
             Exposure Scenario in  Residential Area

                • Direct Ingestion
                • Dermal Absorption
                • Inhalation of Soil Particle (Dust)
                • Inhalation of Vaporized
                                  130

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)              September 1999


                                     THE NETHERLANDS

1. LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUES [1]

The Netherlands policy on contaminated land has been focused on the restoration to multifunctionality up to
1998. The application of the multifunctionality approach to the estimated 110,000 seriously contaminated sites
would have incurred costs of around 50 billion EURO. The Netherlands is now spending about 0.5 billion
EURO per annum, which equals the sum that was initially thought to be sufficient to resolve the entire
problem. But at this speed it would take about 100 years to end the operation.

In the meantime soil contamination would hamper construction and redevelopment essential to economic and
social development and dispersal of contaminants in the groundwater keeps on making the problem even
bigger. For this reason another policy has been introduced. This policy development is known by its acronym
BEVER.

The new approach abandons the strict requirement for contamination to be removed to the maximum extent,
and instead permits clean-up on the basis of suitability for use. At the same time government proposed other
changes to soil  protection legislation, including greater devolution of responsibility for clean-up to local
authorities and the creation of more stimulating instruments.

Basically the policy has switched from a sectoral to an integrated approach. This means that the market has
to play a more prominent role and take more of the financial burden.
Soil contamination should not only be treated as an environmental problem. The soil contamination policy
should also be geared to other social activities such as spatial planning and social and economic development
and vice versa.

The strategy is:
•  to protect clean soil
•  to optimise use of contaminated soil
•  to improve the quality of contaminated soil where necessary
•  to monitor soil quality

This new approach will be paired to stimulation  of the development and application of new technology and
to a more cost-effective organisation of the actual clean-up. These measures taken together are expected to cut
costs by 30-50%.

In mis approach remediation is part of a comprehensive policy regarding soil contamination. Prevention, land
use, treatment of excavated soil, reuse of excavated soil (for example as building material), monitoring of soil
quality and remediation have to be geared to each other in a more sophisticated manner. This "internal"
integration is being promoted under the concept of "active" soil management.

To stimulate market investment a different approach  to government  funding is announced. The taxpayers
money will be used in such a way that it evokes private investment. This will be done by improving  the
existing financial instruments and by the creation of a private sector contaminated land fund. The legal
instalments will be made more effective. The discretion of provinces and municipalities will be further
enlarged to create the flexibility which is needed to initiate and stimulate the measures that are best suited to
the local situation (tailor made solutions).
[1]  This text is based on: The Dutch experience; lesson learned.
    Ton Holtkamp and Onno van Sandick, Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and
    Environment in the Netherlands, January 1998.

                                             131

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)
September 1999
With these measures Dutch government wants to achieve ambitious objects:

•   Within 25 years all sites should be made suitable for use and further dispersal stopped. That means that
    each year almost four times as much sites will have to be remediated as is the case now.

•   Presuming that the costs will be reduced with 30-50%, this requires  a duplication of the total annual
    expenditure on soil remediation.

•   In order to monitor the results of these efforts and to make information on soil quality accessible to the
    general public (for example potential buyers) and to authorities (for example planning authorities) we want
    to have a system of soil quality maps covering the whole country in 2005.

In 1999 a lot of attention is paid to the introduction and implementation of the new approach.

2. REGISTRATION OF CONTAMINATED SITES

Based on the  Soil Protection Act there are two driving forces to investigate soil quality:
•   Anyone intending to excavate and to move soil for building activities, has to report the quality of the soil
    to provincial authorities;

•   Companies who don't want to investigate the soil quality on a voluntary basis might be obliged to do so.

Based on these activities a lot of seriously contaminated sites have been identified. These numbers have
increased enormously since the first case at Lekkerkerk.

                                    Table 1: Inventory of sites
. •. • -- . .
1980
1986
1999
"-'-;• '. -;; .,:"7- ;;. .'. ' ;\.;; . ' /',;.
350
1.600
110,000
-\<./-':". /:/. •••'•:-•:- •'-'': :"'-'• : •
0.5 billion
3 billion
15-25 billion*
        * based on new policy

3. REMEDIAL METHODS

In relation to the policy development, three phases are recognised in the development of remedial methods.
In the first phase restoration to multifunctionality was the aim of the technology. In the second phase control
of the spreading was added and in the third phase control of risks has become the aim of technology.

Table 2 illustrates the development of technology in these phases. In the first phase the treatment technology
for contaminated excavated soil has been developed. This was mainly the physio/chemical technology which
was originally applied in mining and road building, such as particle classification (soil washing) and thermal
treatment. In the next phase containment was added to these technologies. The main containment technologies
are the isolation of a site by non permeable wall barriers and pump and treat. In the latest phase the in-situ
technologies have been developed, especially the in-situ bioremediation.

                      Table 2: Development of technology in the Netherlands
''•-•'.-•• .; ""••
1983

1998
Restoration
No spreading
Control of risks
.'•: " "•••":-'• X'i
Excavation + soil treatment
Containment
In-situ
• ' '"" VV' ••': .•'""•
Physico/chemical
Civil engineering
Biotechnology
                                             132

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)              September 1999


In conjunction with the new approach a research programme NOBIS has been started. The objective of NOBIS
is to develop, evaluate and demonstrate innovative strategies, methods and techniques which will effectively
help to control in-situ remediation by means of biotechnology (biorestoration). With a large scale application
of the attained results a significant reduction in the costs of the soil clean-up operation has to be achieved.
The research programme is supported by the government with 13 million EURO out of the investment fund
to improve the infrastructure for the development and exchange of know-how. An additional 7 million EURO
has been contributed from the private sector. The programme runs until 1999. There are about 50 ongoing and
finished projects.

Due to the impact of NOBIS in-situ bioremediation concepts are more applied now. Especially the concept
of natural attenuation has been embraced by many parties (public and private).  About 10 projects in NOBIS
are  dealing with natural attenuation of chlorinated solvents and BTEX.

4. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION

Starting January lsl,  1999 most of the research on contaminated land is organised in one centre: The Centre
for  Soil Quality Management and Knowledge Transfer (SKB). The 8KB is a co-operative body involving all
parties interested in soil management, i.e. trade and industry as well as the authorities, Initially, the  activities
will be set up for a period of four years (1999-2002), with a possible continuation until 2009.

The mission of SKB is to develop and transfer knowledge about the functional and cost-effective realisation
of a soil quality appropriate to the desired use. The mission perfectly matches the new  Dutch government
policy on soil remediation BEVER, i.e. functional remediation and cost-effective contaminant removal.

A decisive approach to soil contamination and the development of new forms of co-operation must put an end
to the stagnation mat hampers the optimal use of the little space available in the Netherlands. The SKB wants
to achieve this not only through smarter and cheaper technical solutions, but also by devoting attention to
managerial processes, rules and regulations, planning and, last but not least, communication. This requires
applying existing knowledge on the one hand and developing knowledge via applied andstrategic/fundamental
research on the other.

The SKB anticipates initiatives in the following areas of attention:

Urban development and restructuring
Integration of the new development and the restructuring of urban centres in combination with the remediation
of contaminated locations, such as former (gas) works sites.

Restructuring natural areas
Nature development and re-designation of agricultural areas in combination with the remediation of former
dump sites and contaminated dredging sludge.

Water systems management
Integrating the management of surface water and deep groundwater with the quality of the  soil, which consists
of earth and groundwater.

Remediation of existing contaminated locations
Developing  cost effective remediation  strategies ad methods  for contaminated locations, in which risk
assessment, environmental merit, weighing alternatives and in-situ methods are important issues.

Maintenance and soil management
Risk assessment, management and monitoring of residual (mobile) contaminants will receive increasing
attention because it will often be impossible to  fully remove the contamination. Moreover, measures  will have
to be taken to prevent new contamination.

                                             133

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)             September 1999


A Supervisory Board is responsible for the policy and officially takes all decisions. Important decisions
concern the direction in which the programme will be developed, long term plans, annual action plans and the
budget. All parties involved in soil management are represented in the board, namely:

•   The ministries of VROM (Housing, Planning Environment), LNV (Agriculture, Nature Management and
    Fisheries), V&W (Transport and Public Works), Defence, OC&W ( Education and Science) and EZ
    (Economic Affairs).

•   The demand side of the market, including trade and industry, provincial and municipal authorities, water
    boards and managers of rural areas.

•   The supply side of the market,  including trade and industry, consultants, knowledge institutions and
    universities.

•   Other relevant parties,  such as funding  organisations, property  developers, environmental groups,
    insurance companies and branch organisations.

The 8KB is organised as a demand-driven body for the development and transfer of knowledge. This implies
that the organisation does not determine the activities itself, but rather formulates the demand for knowledge
and the supply of solutions and avenues for solutions with the interested parties.

The 8KB is financed by government (18 million EURO) and by the public private market (8 million EURO)
 for 4 years:  1999-2002.

5.     CONCLUSIONS

The Netherlands policy has been changed drastically in 1997. The introduction and implementation of the new
approach is on full swing in 1999. The new approach has also resulted in an increasing demand for knowledge.
The 8KB, a centre for knowledge development and transfer is stimulating both the introduction of the new
approach and the knowledge development.
                                             134

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)              September 1999


                                           NORWAY

1. LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUES

The main law regulating clean up of contaminated land in Norway is the Pollution Control Act from 1981. The
polluter pays principle forms an important basis of the Pollution Control Act.  If the original polluter can no
longer be identified or held responsible, the current land owner may be held liable for investigations and
remedial actions.

Regulation of contaminated land in Norway under the Pollution Control Act is the responsibility  of the
Norwegian Pollution Control Authority (SFT, short for the Norwegian name). While  almost all sites are
directly regulated by the national agency, only a few cases are left to regional authorities (counties). The
Planning and Building Act, however, requires that local authorities consider possible soil contamination  before
a new construction project or land development is licensed. During recent years the national authorities have
encouraged municipalities to use this law in their regulatory work and hence contribute to a reduction  in the
number of construction projects which temporarily have to be  stopped  due to the discovery of soil
contamination.

Contaminated land is generally accepted as a local environmental problem. Therefore the national and regional
authorities are considering whether regulation of contaminated land should be the responsibility of national,
regional or local authorities, and how and to what extent counties and municipalities should be involved.

Clean up of contaminated sites is at present regulated through permits/licenses under the Pollution Control Act.
As the Norwegian procedures for licensing clean up and remedial actions are complicated and time consuming,
the NPCA are preparing a "General Regulation for Contaminated Sites". This allows private and public
companies to conduct the clean up program for their sites without detailed permits or licenses from the
authorities and save time consuming and costly processes.

Norway has developed a decision model consisting of a two-tiered system for regulation of contaminated sites.
Generic target values are developed for most sensitive land use. For other sites or when target values are
exceeded, a system of site-specific risk assessment is applied. The target values are based on data from other
countries.
Improving the target values and implementation  of a systematic approach for risk assessment are issues of high
priority in SFT. This is a part of the decision model for contaminated sites in Norway and reports will be
available in English by the end of 1999.

Norway has decided not to apply the principle of "multifunctionality" as the basis for remediation. Because
clean-up goals are  adjusted to  actual or potential  land use,  site-specific infonnation  regarding levels of
contamination, remedial measures, land use restrictions etc should be kept for future generations. Therefore
it is important mat results from regulation of contaminated land are included in the land use planning system.

2. REGISTRATION OF CONTAMINATED SITES

Registration of contaminated land and contaminated sediments is handled separately in Norway. After the
reorganization of the Norwegian Pollution Control Authority in 1998 contaminated  sites,  contaminated
sediments and contamination from old mining areas have been placed in the same unit, to be handled similarly.

3. CONTAMINATED LAND

Contaminated land in Norway is considered as a significant source for contamination  of rivers, lakes and
fiords. More  than  85% of the  Norwegian  water  supply is based on  surface water, and  consequently
groundwater contamination has been of less concern in Norway compared to many other countries. The
potential impact from industry, contaminated sediments and landfills on the marine environment is of greater
                                             135

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)             September 1999

concern. In some fjords reduced intake of seafood is recommended, due to pollutants such as heavy metals,
PCBs, PAHs or dioxins.

During the years from 1989 to 1991 a national survey of landfills and contaminated sites was carried out in
Norway. More than 2000 possibly contaminated sites were registered. The total number includes municipal
and industrial landfills, industrial sites, gas works, military sites and sites from World War II. In 1992 the
NPCA presented an action-plan for contaminated sites. A status report and revised plan were presented in the
National Budget from the government in 1996. New contaminated sites have continuously been discovered
through land development or construction activities.

The actual status shows mat more than 3350 contaminated sites are now registered in Norway. About 2100
of these sites are considered to have a potential for causing environmental problems. About 99 of these have
been given high priority and investigations and remediation have been started. Additionally ca. 500 sites need
to be investigated. The remaining 1500 sites are considered not to represent environmental problems as long
as they  remain undisturbed (recent land use). Changed  land use or construction work will  lead to new
asessments for these sites.

A GIS-database is developed by the SFT to keep track of all registered sites and any investigation or remedial
action carried out at the different sites.  Information from the database will be used for reporting and by SFT,
by the counties and by the municipalities for their planning purposes.
Contaminated sediments

As a result of monitoring of coastal areas and mapping in selected  fjords and harbours an overview of sites
with contaminated sediments along the coast of Norway was reported and presented, with a priority list, in
1998. More than 120 sites were evaluated and 79 sites are  considered as potentially environmentally harmful
and given a priority rating from 1 to 3.  18 sites are first priority, 28  second priority and 33 third priority. The
information available on these sites is very limited and more investigations are necessary in order to decide
how risk of environmental consequences can be reduced or eliminated.

Norwegian authorities consider the system for handeling contaminated land to be acceptable while very little
has been done concerning contaminated sediments. This is  therefore  a major task for  the coming years.
Evaluation of legislative aspects, marine investigations and research on dredging, treatment and deposition of
contaminated sediments have been started and will be given priority over the next 2-3 years.

4. REMEDIAL METHODS

An overview of treatment technologies for contaminated land in Norway shows mat the following technologies
are commercially available through Norwegian companies:
•   Bioventing
•   Vacuum Extraction
•   Air Sparging
•   Pump-and-Treat
•   Biopiles
•   Landfarming
•   Soil Washing
•   Solidification/Stabilisation
•   Incineration

In-Situ and Ex-Situ/On Site bioremediation technologies are mainly conducted by consultancies. In total 5 to
10 consulting companies have experience with these technologies. In addition to the consultancies about 3 to
5 companies have specialised in treatment of contaminated soil in Norway as their major activity. They have
so far concentrated on solidification/stabilisation, soil washing, land farming and partly incineration. The small
number of sites in the "remediation phase" together with easy access to and low prices on landfills are major
reasons  for the limited developent and accessibility of treatment technologies on the market,
                                             136

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)              September 1999


The SFT has started projects on national and local scale to develop guidelines for management of excavated
contaminated soil. The guidelines will be administrative tools for local, regional and national authorities and
support the existing legislation on contaminated land. A more consistent asessment by the authorities is of great
importance to society.

5. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

The major development in the field of contaminated land will be to finish and implement the guidelines for
risk asessment and general regulation of contaminated soil. Projects concerning applicability of treatment
technologies are proposed.

Research projects on deposition of contaminated sediments are a high priority for the National Research
Council. SFT focus on aspects such as dredging in fine grained sediments, land fill for contaminated sediments
at the coast, and waste deposits of contaminated sediments in deep fjords under naturally anoxic and depositing
conditions in the projects. Further  investigations are to be started in 5 - 6 of 18 first priority fiords and
harbours. Competence and experience on investigation, environmentally acceptable dredging, and construction
or establishing of waste deposits for contaminated sediments and soils on shore at the coast and under water,
are to be developed.

6. CONCLUSIONS

The Norwegian Pollution Control Authority has the following priorities:

>  Transfer of responsibility, competence and  resources to county or regional authorities on the regulation
    of contaminated sites.

>  Preparation of a "General Regulation for Contaminated Sites" which allows private and public companies
    to conduct the clean up program for their sites without detailed permits or licenses from the authorities and
    thereby saving time consuming and costly processes

>  Implementation of a system for site specific risk assessment, including target values for sensitive land use,
    as a part of the decision model for regulation of contaminated land.

>  Development of guidelines for management of excavated contaminated soil.

>  Starting investigations in areas with contaminated sediments in order to be able to decide remedial action.

>  Research and development concerning handling of contaminated sediments.
                                             137

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)              September 1999
                                           ROMANIA

The institutionalizing of the activity of the environmental protection in Romania took place in 1990 by setting
up the Ministry of Water. Forestry and the Environmental Protection (MAPPM). By mat time, there existed,
at national level, the National Council for the Environmental Protection as a representative institution without
any executive prerogatives organized according to the Law on the Environmental Protection No 9 of 1973 .This
law was replaced in 1995 by the Law on the Environmental Protection No. 137, a law containing stipulations
and approaches according to the European Legislation.

At the level of the  local  administrative structures, in 41 counties, the Ministry of Waters, Forests and the
Environmental Protection is represented by the Environmental Protection Agencies. The global legislative
frame is extremely complicated and undergoing a continuous process of adjustment due to the economic
transition, to privatizing and transfer of land ownership,  situation that also affects the legal frame of the
protection of the environment in Romania.

The main polluting source of the soil and of the underground waters is represented by the industrial activity
from mining, petrochemistry, metallurgy, the industry of fertilisers and the power energy.

1. LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUES

The Law on the Environmental Protection, promulgated in 1995, establishes the general framework for the
activities of the environment protection in Romania, the prerogatives of central and local authorities, of the
local and national public  administration together with the principles and the  strategic elements for sustainable
development. An important stipulation refers to the obligation of maintaining, improving the quality of the
environment together with the reconstruction of the damaged areas.

The law contains prerogatives referring to the procedure of permitting the activities with impact upon the
environment, regulations  for dangerous wastes and substances, regulations for fertilisers and pesticides, waters
protection, the protection of natural resources,  the protection  of the soil and  subsoil and specifies the
responsibilities of the physical and juridical  persons, of the  public administration and the Environment
authorities for observing the requirements of his law.

Based on the prerogatives of the Constitution of Romania and on the Law on the Environmental Protection,
in the field of decontaminating and cleaning up the polluted sites and the underground waters there has been
created a favorable legislative framework which is under continuous improving and completion.
Similar stipulations can also be found both in The National Strategy of the Protection of the Environment in
Romania and in the National  Plan for Action for the Environmental Protection.

Along this period of time a series  of complementary legislative acts have been issued including stipulations
regarding the rehabilitation of the polluted sites and of the underground waters on a priority level in Romania's
policy for the environment:

•   The Law of the Real Estate No. 18/1991
•   The Law on Waters Protection No. 107/1996
•   Law No. 6/1991 regarding the  adherence to the Convention  of Basel concerning  the cross-border
    transportation of the  dangerous wastes.
•   The Law of the Mines No. 6/1998
•   The Law of the Local Public Administration No. 69/1991 republished and modified in 1996.
•   The Law No. 137/1996 regarding the collecting, recycling and the use  of reusable wastes.
•   The Law of Privatizing the Commercial Companies state owned
•   Governmental Decision 437/1992 regarding the system of wastes importing.
•   Governmental Decision 155/1999 regarding the introduction of the wastes evidence and the European
    Catalogue of Wastes.
                                             138

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)              September 1999

•   Governmental Decision no. 55/1998 regarding the Privatizing of the Commercial Partnerships with capital
    of state.
•   Governmental Decision no. 816/1998 regarding the conserving and the final closing up of some mines and
    quarries.
•   Governmental Decision no.  17/1999 regarding the conserving and the final closing up of some mines and
    quarries - second stage.
•   Governmental Decision no. 511/1994 regarding measures for controlling the pollution of the environment
    by companies that produce polluting wastes.
•   Ministry7 Bill of MAPPM no. 125/1996 regarding the permitting  procedure for the economic activities
    having an impact upon the environment.
•   Ministry Bill of MAPPM no. 184/1998  regarding the content of the impact  studies  and of the
    environmental assessment
•   Ministry Bill of MAPPM no. 756/1998 regarding the evaluation of the environment pollution.
•   Ministry Bill of MAPPM no.  111/1999 regarding the  entitling of the companies to make ecological
    improvements and make  some workings for closing up the mines
•   The Bill of the Agency for Mineral Resources No. 6/1999 regarding the procedure of concession of the
    right for exploiting the mineral resources.
•   The Bill of the National Agency of the Mineral Resources No 116/1998 regarding the technological
    regulations for closing up the mines.
•   Romanian standards 13343, 13386, 13387. 13388 for wastes management

A series of stipulations in the field of cleaning up the polluted sites and of the  underground waters are included
in different laws having an economic, privatizing or commercial character.

With the aim to supplementing  and perfecting the legislative frame the Ministry of Waters, Forests and the
Environmental Protection has drawn up a packet of regulations that are to be approved by the Parliament or
the  Government:

•   Bill regarding the setting up of the National Fund for the Environment.
•   Bill regarding the wastes conditions (regulations)
•   Governmental Decision Bill for controlling the wastes import, export and transit.
•   Governmental Decision Bill for treating the responsibilities referring to asbestos.
•   Governmental Decision Bill for treating the responsibilities referring to PCB using.
•   Bill of the  MAPPM regarding the compliance programs.
•   Bill of the  MAPPM regarding the instructions for remedying the soil and the underground waters.

Starting with this year the Romanian Government has taken the decision of elaborating the National Strategy
for  Sustainable Development meant to establish the priority directions of action, at national level, for the
sustainable development of the country along a medium and long term.

According to the principle "  polluter pays " the decontamination costs  for  the soil and the underwater are
incumbent on who produced  it or in case of estate transfer, the costs are subject for negotiation between the
vendor and the buyer. In case of closing up the activity of a state enterprise the clean up costs are taken over
by the public debt.

2. REGISTRATION OF CONTAMINATED SITES

The Ministry of Agriculture  is making the studies for the  soil quality without any particular interest for
identifying and recording  of the contaminated sites. In 1975 there has been set up The National Integrated
System for the Soil Quality, harmonized with EU in 1992.
                                             139

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)
                                                    September 1999
The Monitoring of the quality of underground waters of Romania devolved upon the authorities for the water
of Romania but the collected data were not enough for elaborating a fundamental and complete study on the
pollution of the underground waters.

In the last years The Ministry of Water. Forests and the Environmental Protection draws up a yearly report
regarding the wastes management including the inventory of the characteristics and the quantity of wastes
generated at national level as well as the way they are being stored, recycled and/or eliminated. The report is
drawn up by The Bucharest Institute of Research and Environment Design (ICIM) according to the statistics
offered by the agencies for the Environmental Protection and the National Institute of Statistics.

The industrial activity represents the main source of wastes and generates the biggest number of polluted sites
in Romania. According to the last Report, the industrial wastes in a quantity of 209 million tons represents
about 95 % of all the wastes generated in Romania in 1997.

                              Table 1. Types of wastes (million tons)
Mining solid
wastes
169.8
Slag and
ashes
11.2
Metallurgical
wastes
2.9
Industrial
sludge
1.4
Chemical
wastes
1.1
Toxic and hazardous
wastes
1.6
                             Amounts of solid wastes ( %")
                                        Toxic and
                                       hazardous       Industrial
                                        wastes        sludges
Cherrical
wastes
                       Metallurgical
                        wastes
                                                           Slug and ashes
                                                               61%
                       The amount of mining solid wastes was not included
                                Table 2. Industrial wastes deposits
Deposit type
Tailing dams
Mining solid wastes deposits
Slug and ashes deposits
Simple industrial wastes deposits
Number
169
186
91
252
Area ( ha)
2,300
4.700
2.500
500

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)
                                          September 1999
                            Number and areas of the wastes deposits
                              Simple
                             Industrial
                              wastes
                             deposits
S lug and
 ashes
deposits
Tailing
dams
                      'Area(ha)
                      Number
 Mining
 solid
 wastes
deposits
The total number of registered deposits in the ICIM database is 970 out of which 712 are deposits of industrial
wastes that cover an area of over 10,000 ha. Up to this date there has not been drawn up a National Register
of Contaminated Sites but an evaluation of ICIM for Harvard Institute for International Development (1998)
estimates a number of 1639 sites contaminated covering atotal area of 164.254 ha. To this mere can be added
a number of some thousands of sites polluted with oil-products covering areas from about square meters and
tens of hectares.

The quality of the underground waters is monitored by 2,000 hydrogeological bore holes as part of the National
Hydrometric supervision network. To this there can be added 12,000 watching points:
1. Hydrogeological bore holes for the observation of the pollution in the contaminated sites
2. Exploitation drillings for water supply
3. Water wells located in rural areas

There has been estimated mat in the areas with waste deposits the underwater is polluted mainly due to the
inadequate isolation of the sites. The present information obtained by ICIM is not enough for a perfect unitary
global evaluation of the quality of underground waters in Romania.

3. TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM

In 1998 there has been set up The National Committee for Sustainable Development's an intergovernmental
structure intended to elaborating a national strategy for sustainable development that also includes among its
tasks the wastes management and the cleaning of the contaminated sites. The sectoriale politics in this field
are coordinated by the Ministries in whose activities there exist such problems.

The coordination of the activity of research and technological development devolves upon The National
Agency for Research and Technology. The technological development is assured by the national institutes on
fields of activity under the co-ordination of the Ministries or the independent research institutes.   Tnestoategy
for the Environmental Protection in Romania includes the elaboration of a unitary program of technological
development in the field of decontaminating the polluted sites mat has not been finished yet.
                                             141

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)              September 1999

4. REMEDIAL METHODS IN USE

During the recent years and mainly after the coming out of the Law on the Environmental Protection mere has
been made ample actions for solving the problems regarding the decontamination of the polluted sites. The
most frequent methods are:

•   on site isolation - most frequent
•   excavation and soil removal
•   natural attenuation
•   reactive barriers for petrochemical soil and underground waters pollution
•   pump and treat ( chemical and biological treatment)

The historical pollution, of long standing, without any intervention along the last years supposes high costs
for decontamination activities on a large scale of the polluted sites. The methods used up to this moment are
applied on a relatively small scale and mainly in the regions with strong accents of pollution.

5. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES

The activity of Research  and Development is sustained by the  Ministry of Waters. Forests and the
Environmental Protection through the Institute of Research and Environment  Design and also by other
ministries or national companies together with other institutes specialized in fields with an impact upon the
environment.

Such  research centers exist  at the  Ministry of Industry and  Trade (metallurgy, electric power, mining,
chemistry, Syderurgy), The Ministry of Agriculture, The Ministry of Public Workings and Planning , The
National Agency of Research  and Technology, The Oil National Company, The Coal National Company, and
another series of independent institutes and universities.

The companies responsible for decontaminating the polluted sites resort to technologies existing in Romania,
ask for achieving adequate technologies to the existing situations or import such technologies. The Romanian
research  activities  in  this field are  directed towards finding new  cost-effective methodologies for
decontamination and aim at all known techniques:
•   pump and treat ( heavy metals, cyanides,  phenols, VOCs, SVOCs) physicochemical and biological
    treatment
•   site isolation
•   bioremediation
•   vapour striping
•   other

The Ministry of Waters, Forests and the Environmental Protection of Romania  has concentrated lately on
inventorying and monitoring the contaminated sites and in the near future the databases will be constituted
containing verified and accessible decontaminating technologies as well as of the polluted sites at national
scale.

6. CONCLUSIONS

1.  The problem of decontaminating the polluted areas is of high priority in the Government policy.

2.  There exist the necessary minimum legal frame even if this one has been recently structured in order to
    be able to determine actions in this sense.

3.  The research and the development of the technologies for decontaminating of the pollutes sites  has an
    ascending

                                             142

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)              September 1999


4.   The costs of using decontaminating technologies are still very high for Romania.

5.   The cooperation between Romanian and foreign experts is necessary in order to use decontaminating cost-
    effective technologies.

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)              September 1999


                                          SLOVENIA

INTRODUCTION

The situation of environmental protection has not changed substantially over the last year; however, some new
documents drafted by the responsible ministry were presented to the public. In 1998 and  1999, some
documents, envisaged to address the situation of environmental protection in an overall manner, were sent for
public discussion:

       Environmental Situation Report for 1996, published in 1998;
       Strategic Guidelines of the Republic of Slovenia for  Waste Management;
       National Environmental Protection Programme, published in December 1998.

These documents have yet to be adopted and verified in parliament, therefore their application is not yet legally
binding. Today I will briefly present these three documents, as well as specific obstacles mat may hinder their
practical implementation in the near future.

1. ENVIRONMENTAL SITUATION REPORT

The 1996 Environmental Situation Report was published as late as the end of 1998. It is almost impossible to
understand that it took this long for the responsible services at the Ministry of the  Environment, which  are
bound by  law to draft  such reports on an annual basis, to  collect, edit, prepare and process data on  the
environment.  It took as long as two years for the report to become ready for printing, during a time when  the
environmental situation appears to be disastrous, calling for immediate measures for improvement. On  the
other  hand, the delay is understandable, since the government currently in office appears to express  no
particular interest in investing large amounts of money in environmental protection. Regardless  of the delay,
it needs to be  said mat the report sets out the situation in exceptional detail, and it is accompanied by all data
relevant to the assessment of the environmental situation, thus giving a realistic reflection of this situation.

The report has several chapters on the following topics:
    information on the environmental situation and public involvement,
    research in support of environmental protection,
    environmental control,
    economic instruments in the field of environmental protection,
    planning instruments for the protection of the environment,
    air,
    water.
    soil,
    nature and biodiversity,
    natural resources - mineral  raw materials.
    urban  environments,
    environmental health conditions,
    waste,
    nuclear safety and radioactivity',
    environmental disasters,
    the driving forces behind releases into the environment and
    environmental issues.

At this point I would like to provide a few illustrative examples from the report; these concern air, water,
environmental protection control and waste.
                                             144

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)
September 1999
1.1. Air

In Slovenia, probably the largest amount of attention and care was dedicated to the measuring of air pollution
and the elimination of emissions; the situation in this field was comparatively good even in the past and has
further improved over recent years. The ANAS system (analytical supervisory and alert system) was set up
several decades age to measure levels of air pollution. This system has been suitably upgraded over recent
years.

The readings of SO2 and fume concentration levels are taken 24 hours a day in all sizeable towns throughout
Slovenia. Table 1 shows in how many locations readings were taken for individual pollutants in the 1990-1996
period.

                   Table 1: Number of air pollution control locations in Slovenia
Parameter
SO2
NOX
CO
Ozone
Total airborne particles
Fumes
EMEP net
GAW net
1990
13+55
5
2
5
1
55
-
-
1993
21+61
5
2
5
1
61
1
1
1994
22+59
6
3
6
2
59
1
1
1995
20+59
7
3
6
4
59
1
1
1996
20+59
8
3
8
7
59
2
2
Sulphur dioxide
The reduction in concentrations of SO2 in the air is the result of the switch from the use of coal to natural gas
for heating in all sizeable towns; where coal is still in use, imported varieties with lower sulphur content are
used. Only in some of the control locations was the maximum pennissible concentration of SO2 exceeded for
several hours (MFC is 250 (.ig/m , and the recommended concentration between 40 and 60 (.ig/nf, which is
the arithmetic average of daily averages for one year).

Carbon dioxide
Slovenia has ratified the UN Framework Convention on  Climate Change (UN FCCC). Until 1996, CO2
emissions were declining, but after 1991 they started to increase slightly, as seen from Table 2. The table also
supplies data on CO2 emissions by industrial branch in shares. The field is now also regulated by the Decree
on Taxes on Releasing CO2 Emissions into the Air (Official Gazette of the Republic of Slovenia, no. 68/96)
whose aim is to  reduce CO2 emissions by an average of 8 per cent between 2008 and 2012, as set by the 1997
Kyoto Protocol, which has also been signed and ratified by Slovenia.
                                             145

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)
September 1999
      Table 2: CO2 emissions (in thousand tons) and shares (%) by main branches, 1986 - 1996
Branch
Energy
production*
Transport
Industrial
burning
Technological
processes
Total
1986
8833
56%
2678
17%
3543
23%
608
4%
15662
1990
7376
52%
3429
24%
2726
19%
641
5%
14172
1991
7376
56%
2968
22%
2310
17%
600**
5%
13254
1992
7713
57%
3122
23%
2119
16%
570**
4%
13524
1993
7828
56%
3699
27%
1740
13%
540**
4%
13807
1994
7701
54%
4138
29%
1996
14%
520
3%
14335
1995
8046
54%
4454
30%
1707
12%
533
4%
14740
1996
8657
54.7%
5061
32%
1546
9.7%
562
3.6%
15826
* Thermal plants, heating plants, boiler rooms and small fireplaces
** CO2 emission from technological processes for 1991, 1992 and 1993 estimated on the basis of data for 1990
and 1994/95.

Nitrogen oxides (NO,)
Air pollution caused by nitrogen oxides is not a problem, as in 1996 the maximum permissible concentrations
were not exceeded at any of the control locations. It has been noted, however, that NOX emissions are
increasing steadily. In 1995, emission levels fell slightly as a result of the increased use of catalytic converters
in motor vehicles. Table 3 provides data on the levels of the main air pollutants: SO2, NOX, CO, CO2, for
1994, 1995 and 1996.

                                            Table 3

1994
1995
1996
SO2 t/year
176.514
119.301
109.689
NOX t/year
65.924
66.591
70.144
CO t/year
92.846
91.427
95.371
CO2 103t/year
13.836
14.208
15.107
Volatile hydrocarbons VOC
The measuring of the levels of these compounds in the air was begun in 1995. It has become clear that
applicable legislation is very inadequate, as the maximum permissible concentrations are extremely high - for
toluene, for example, it is set at 1 mg/m3. In 1996. it became clear mat in the capital of Slovenia the
concentrations of these compounds were between 8 and  11 (.ig/mj,  which is higher than the maximum
concentrations permitted in western European countries.

Volatile hydrocarbons NMVOC (not including methane)
In 1990, NMVOC emissions amounted to 35,000 tons. The objective pursued by Slovene legislation is, by
2000, to reduce this amount by around 30 per cent in comparison to 1990, which is going to be difficult to
achieve.

Ozone
In summer the concentration  levels for this particular pollutant often exceed the  maximum  permissible
concentrations, especially in settlements (the recommended level is 65 (.ig/nr in 24 hours).

Ozone layer protection
Over recent years Slovenia has made a shift for the better in this area with the signing and ratification of the
Montreal Protocol and its London Addition. Slovenia does not produce any ozone-depleting substances, but
it imports from the EU. In 1994, the government  adopted a programme for discontinuing the use of ozone-
depleting substances and some of factories have already replaced CFC, 1,1,1-trichloroethane and HCFC in
their production of cooling and air-conditioning appliances. The consumption of these substances fell by more
than 80 per cent in comparison to 1986.
                                             146

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)
September 1999
1.2. Water

Most of the decrees and regulations adopted in recent years concern water protection. The legislator's main
objective with these acts is to protect water sources and at the same time ensure mat all polluters pay a tax for
polluting water. In recent years probably the most progress was made related to the care for the quality of all
types of water sources, as the legislator became aware of the importance of this basic natural resource. All
bodies of water are protected by law and any commercial exploitation requires a concession, which is granted
by the government. A permit must also be obtained to use water for any other purpose.

The report gives a picture of the condition of water by individual segments  and supplies data on the release
of substances into the water and water consumption by all types of activities.

Quality ofgrounchvater
The quality of groundwater is monitored twice a year at 84 locations which are  distributed throughout all 15
plains  containing groundwater. The  water is assessed according to EU guidelines with which Slovene
legislation has  been harmonised  (Official Gazette of the Republic of Slovenia, no. 46/97). The main
groundwater contaminants include nitrates, heavy metals, pesticides and volatile organic compounds (VOC).

Nitrates: in 1996, concentrations of nitrates in excess of 50 mg NO3/1, which is  still permissible according to
the Drinking Water Act, were established in four of the plains with groundwater. These were mostly situated
in areas subjected to heavy use of artificial fertilisers.

Heavy metals: if we use the MFCs from EU directives, the maximum permissible concentrations for metals
were exceeded in around 12 per cent of all groundwater samples collected in 1996  - Table 4. The most
frequent offenders were zinc (in 15 cases), copper (1 case), six-valence chrome (2 cases) and mercury (1 case).

                         Table 4: MFC for heavy metals in drinking water


Cujig/1
Zn ng/1
Cd ng/1
Cr (III) jig/1
Cr (VI) ng/1
Ni ng/1
Pb ne/i
HgHg/1
Official Gazette of the R of
Slovenia No. 46/97
MPC
2000
3000
3
50
50
20
10
1
EU Directive 80/778/EEC
MPC
-
-
5
50
-
50
50
1
MPC - Maximum permissible concentration
RC - Recommended concentration

Pesticides: according to the rules (Official Gazette of the Republic of Slovenia, nos. 46/97 and 52/97) the total
concentrations of all pesticides in drinking water may not exceed 0.5 (.ig/1 or 0.1 (ig/1 for an individual
pesticide. According to the report, these values were exceeded in 30 per cent of all tests and analyses carried
out. Water was analysed for 27 pesticides and their metabolites in common use. Between 1992 and 1996 a fall
in the concentration of pesticides in groundwater was observed, as seen from Table  5. The maximum
permissible level was most frequently exceeded by the pesticide atrazine. This pesticide was most often found
in groundwater in the areas of intensive fanning practices and where excessive amounts of chemical substances
had  been used. In addition  to atrazine,  the most common pesticides  exceeding  the  limits included
metalochlorine compounds and dieldrin.
                                             147

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)
September 1999
         Table 5: Pesticide levels in groundwater in Slovenia in 1992, 1994, 1995 and 1996
                                       Pesticide levels

Groundwater
Prekmursko.-Apasko polje
Mursko polje
Dravsko polje- Vrbanski
plato
Ptujsko polje
Sp.Savin.dol.-dol.Bolske in
Hudinje
Kranjsko polje
Sorsko polje
Dol.Kamn.Bist Vodisko polje
Ljubljansko polje in Barje
Bre» isko-» atesko polje
Krsko polje
Vipavsko-Soska dolina
Slovenija
No.of
sampling
locations

7
3
10
4
11
4
9
7
11
5
8
4
83
Sample
below
MC*(%)
1992
29
67
18
25
36
71
89
53
100
100
93
100
63
Sample
below
MC*(%)
1994
29
82
45
63
57
100
94
50
95
100
69
100
68
Sample
below
MC*(%)
1995
28
100
41
25
65
100
94
50
100
90
81
100
70
Sample
below
MC*(%)
1996
35
100
36
37
71
100
100
57
100
100
100
100
77
Pesticide levels

Groundwater
Prekmursko.-Apasko polje
Mursko polje
Dravsko polje-Vrbanski
plato
Ptujsko polje
Sp.Savin.dol.-dol.Bolske in
Hudinje
Kransjko polje
Sorsko polje
Dol.Kamn.Bist Vodisko polje
Ljubljansko polje in Barje
Bre» isko-» atesko polje
Krsko polje
Vipavsko-Soska dolina
Slovenija
No.of
sampling
locations

7
<->
3
10
4
11
4
9
7
11
5
8
4
83
MC (ng/1)
1992
3.83
0.55
5.06
2.17
1.80
0.73
2.18
4.66
0.27
0.40
0.50
0.29

MC (ng/1)
1994
2.16
0.59
19.95
1.44
0.95
0.27
0.55
3.17
0.61
0.35
1.04
0.05

MC (ng/1)
1995
1.83
0.34
4.41
2.34
0.63
0.14
0.82
2.70
0.33
0.52
0.81
0.05

MC (ng/1)
1996
1.55
0.26
3.20
2.17
0.74
0.31
0.30
1.69
0.45
0
0.48
0.05

                                           148

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)
September 1999
Atrazine levels

Groundwater
Prekmursko.-Apasko polje
Mursko polje
Dravsko polje- Vrbanski
plato
Ptujsko polje
Sp.Savin.dol.-dol.Bolske in
Hudinje
Kransjko polje
Sorsko polje
Dol.Kamn.Bist Vodisko polje
Ljubljansko polje in Barje
Bre» isko-» atesko polje
Krsko polje
Vipavsko-Soska dolina
Slovenija
No.of
sampling
locations

7
3
10
4
11
4
9
7
11
5
8
4
83
MC** (ng/1)
1992
1.30
0.20
2.10
1.10
0.77
0.40
1.50
0.82
-
0.20
0.30
0.20

MC** (jig/1)
1994
0.80
0.25
7.30
0.49
0.23
0.15
0.25
0.56
0.57
0.10
0.19
0

MC** (fig/1)
1995
0.85
0.12
1.30
0.82
0.52
0.13
0.21
0.47
0.32
0.24
0.13
0

MC** (jig/l)
1996
0.58
0.08
1.64
0.66
0.74
0.20
0.16
0.34
0.40
0
0.24
0

Footnote:
* MPL for pesticides in total is 0.5 (.ig/1
** MPL for atrazine is 0.1 (ig/1
Source: Ministry of the Environment and Physical Planning. Hydrometerological Institute

Volatile organic compounds (VOC): the maximum permissible concentrations for chlorinated organic solvents
and some aromatic compounds in particular were exceeded in 16 cases, according to EU standards (the
permissible level for an individual solvent is 1 (ig/l). The most likely source of this type of groundwater
pollution is a discharge of untreated local industrial waste-water.

Quality of water sources
Biological and chemical parameters of water sources are analysed when the need arises. At least 15 of the most
important sources are analysed annually. The water sources which are situated on karstic ground are especially
vulnerable to contamination, as it is well-known that the self-purification abilities of these areas are poor. The
analyses of such  sources showed that water sources in the karst area were contaminated in some places with
phenolic compounds, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, heavy metals and mineral oils. In two of the locations,
the presence of organophosphorous compounds was established.

Quality of running surface water
The monitoring of running surface water for quality includes the following:
    physical and chemical analysis and biological analysis,
    saprobiological analysis,
    testing for 7 metal in water, suspended in particles and in the sediment,
    testing for organic compounds in water, namely: phenols, pesticides, polycyclical aromatic hydrocarbons,
    BFC, GC/MF picture.

Monitoring is performed  at approximately 100 sites between two and six times a year. The number of readings
and the analysis depends on the pollution levels and  on the importance of the particular water stream. The
analysis is carried out in accordance with EU regulations and the WHO Recommendations for Drinking Water.
Based on the results of the analysis, water is then classified into one of the following four categories:
    1st category of water which, according to the WHO recommendations, is suitable for drinking,
    2nd category of water which is moderately polluted water and can be made suitable for drinking following
    treatment by appropriate methods.
                                              149

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)
September 1999
    3rd category of water which is not suitable for any use,
    4lh category of water from heavily polluted streams.

There are five streams in specific areas that fall into the fourth categoiy of being heavily polluted and
unsuitable for any use.

Quality of lakes
Regular monitoring of lake water takes place only at the three largest lakes. In addition to the monitoring of
lake water,  all their tributaries and outflows are regularly monitored. The water in  all three lakes is
comparatively clean and has been improving in recent years, following the construction of purification plants
on their tributaries.

Quality of sea water
The Slovene coast, which is situated in the northern part of the Adriatic Sea, is only 45 km long. This  section
of coast is part of the Gulf of Trieste, which is heavily polluted.  Slovenia has signed  and  ratified three
important protocols on the protection of the Mediterranean Sea, as follows:
- Protocol on Protecting the Mediterranean Sea from Land Pollution,
- Protocol on Cooperation in Fighting Against Pollution of the Mediterranean Sea by Oil and Oilier Dangerous
Substances in the Event of an Accident,
- Protocol on Special Protected Areas in the Mediterranean Sea.
The sea is mainly polluted with nitrates, phosphates, carbohydrates and heavy metals. Monitoring runs
throughout the year.

Table 6 provides a comparison of the inputs of some pollutants into the coastal sea, based on assessments for
the 1983-1988 and 1989-95 periods.

 Table 6: Comparison of the overall input of some pollutants in the coastal sea, assessed on the basis
              of data on river input and waste for the 1983-1998 and 1989-995 periods
Pollutant
Quantity
suspended particles
carbon, total
phosphorous, total
detergents
Mercury
Cadmium
Lead
Chrome
Zinc
1983-1988 period
t/year
6324
1094
172
46
0.06
0.69
1.26
10.51
1413.0
1989-95 period
t/year
7002
1075
134
60
0.04
1.40
18.89
2.13
343.7
Source: Biology Institute at the University of Ljubljana, Piran Marine Biology Station

Releases into water
Most of the releases into the water are caused by municipal and industrial wastewater.
Municipal purification plants are used for the treatment of only about 30 per cent of municipal wastewater;
around 45 per cent of municipal wastewater is collected in wastewater reservoirs and 25 per cent is discharged
into water streams or the ground without any prior treatment. Only 6 out of 125 municipal purification plants
are bigger than 100,000 PE. The rest are smaller, mostly local purification plants of around 2,000 PE.

Table  7 contains data  on  annual  quantities of wastewater (in million m ) released by industry, mining,
electricity production into the ground, the public sewage system and surface waters. The last columns in Table
7 make it clear why some of the Slovene streams are so heavily polluted with various industrial contaminates.
                                             150

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)
September 1999
    Table 7: Annual quantities of wastewater (in million m3) discharged by industry, mining and
                                      electricity production
Discharged wastewater
Year
1985
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
Ground
3.9
4.3
3.9
3.6
2.1
1.7
1.4
1.4
2.6
Public sewage system
64.4
58.5
66.7
59.2
36.4
37.3
31.0
30.0
30.0
Surface water
804.1
738.3
764.2
693.9
785.9
613.3
596.1
762.7
733.1
 Source: Statistical Office of Slovenia

Water consumption
Water used for drinking is collected mostly from springs. Approximately 30xl06m3 of water is consumed annually. Most
of the water used by industry, which consumes around 150xl06 mVyear, also comes from the springs. The water for
farming, approximately 4.5xl06 nrVyear, is generally supplied by the accumulation reservoirs. Surface running water is
used to generate electricity.

In terms of quantity, Slovenia falls into the group of countries with a fairly abundant water supply. The
problem is that water is unevenly distributed and that in some  of the  surface water  streams the difference
between the minimum and medium flow is quite large, and as a result there are regions in Slovenia which
suffer from water shortages. Slovenia has around  7,000 streams with  a mass of water totalling around 63
m3/sek.
1.3. Environmental control

hi 1995, the Inspectorate of the Republic of Slovenia for the Environment and Physical Planning was founded.
It consists  of two services:  Environmental Inspection and  Physical Planning Inspection. Environmental
Inspection  is authorised to conduct the following: supervision of the quality of water and water streams;
supervision of the storing of dangerous substances; control of air pollution and noise; supervision of waste and
waste disposal sites; supervision of nature protection; supervision of electromagnetic radiation; carrying out
various interventions in the event of accidents that may cause environmental pollution; carrying out technical
inspections of new investments.
hi the opinion of the inspection, the following is required if more effective supervision and an improved overall
situation of environmental protection is to be achieved:

    an increase in the number of inspectors, in keeping with the legislation,
    setting-up local environmental inspection or supervisory bodies, in keeping with the law,
    better technical equipment for inspection (cars, phones, computer equipment, etc.).

The most important is the realisation that one of the main reasons for the abysmal environmental situation in
Slovenia is poor waste management,  which is why the inspection proposed that relevant legislation be
immediately adopted, which  will empower it to take measures.

1.4. Waste management

The situation of waste management is probably the worst of all the areas where the legislator has devoted its
attentions to the environment, hi comparison with legal acts that have been prepared and adopted in other areas
of environmental protection, in this area the legislation lags  behind. The majority of implementing regulations
for waste management are  very dated; only two instructions and two rules have been adopted in recent years.
In spite of the legal obligation the situation has not changed in practice, and waste keeps piling up in various

                                              151

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)
September 1999
official or even illegal dumpsites. Although the situation is critical, the relevant ministry and the government
are not doing enough to regulate the matter.

The amount of waste
Despite some efforts carried out in the past, the amount of waste that is generated annually continues to grow.
Each year around 850,000 tons of municipal waste is produced (420 kg/ person ). This number includes around
75 per cent  of households which are covered by organised waste collection service. Table 8  shows the
quantities for all types of waste  and their shares in percent and by branch.
                      Table 8: Waste by the branch which generated it, 1994

            All types of waste in total               8.57 million tons

                                 by agriculture, forestry and food
            processing                            40%
            construction waste material             26%
            energy sector                          14%
            municipal waste                       10%
            industrial waste                       10%
           Sources: Ministry of the Environment and Physical Planning, Strategic Guidelines
           on Waste Management, 1996

Waste management
The most common method of waste management is disposal, since Slovenia does not have any municipal or
industrial waste incinerators (with the exception of two factories with local incinerators, which are of limited
capacity and suffice only for their own needs). Almost all waste is deposited at 53 municipal dumpsites, most
of which (at least 70 per cent) will be full within 4 to 6 years. In addition to these, there are also 13 dumpsites
for some types of industrial and mining waste. Slovenia has ratified the Basel Convention on Export. Import
and Transit of Dangerous Goods and pursuant to this document around 5,500 tons of waste was exported and
21,000 tons imported in 1996.

2.  STRATEGIC   GUIDELINES  OF  THE  REPUBLIC  OF  SLOVENIA  FOR  WASTE
    MANAGEMENT

As far as its content and the dates it sets, this document is unrealistic, as the dates for some of the activities that
should have been carried out by now have already passed.

The document addresses the following groups of issues:
    situation on waste management,
    strategic guidelines and objectives for waste management,
    measures for achieving the objectives.
    identification of bodies in charge of activities,
    developmental scenario and investments,
and finally, a short-term programme for enacting the concept of waste management.

Situation of waste management
The conditions for the handling of waste have been critical for several decades  now. The amount of all types
of waste is growing from year to year and nearly all types of waste end up in municipal dumpsites, illegal
dumpsites and car junkyards. There  is little use made of the material or energy potential, even though it would
be possible, through selection of waste at the source, to recycle or produce energy from at least 50 per cent of
all waste.
                                            152

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)              September 1999

Strategic guidelines for and objectives of waste management
Tliis part addresses the issue of waste handling as part of the developmental strategy for the economy, energy
sector and agriculture. It  envisages a reduction in the  amount waste produced, inactivation  of waste,
immobilisation of dangerous waste, use of material and energy potential of waste. It also sets dates by when
individual stages  of handling need to be prepared. This is where doubts arise as to how realistic this plan
actually is. By 2000 all regulations, decrees and standards are to be prepared and expert administrative services
set up to co-ordinate waste handling. It also  envisages that within 10 years of implementing the concept of
waste handling the amount of waste now deposited at dumpsites will be reduced by around 40 per cent, and
within 15 years, by around 60 per cent, and mat around 48 per cent of all waste will be used for its material
and energy values.

Measures for reaching the objectives
The condition for  reaching the set objectives is that key measures, legislative regulations, economic  measures,
physical planning  measures, the protection of natural and cultural heritage, organisational measures and R&D
activities are ensured.

The harmonisation of Slovene legislation with the EU regulations should be happening much faster than at
present, as practically nothing is being done in this area. The economic measures envisage that money for the
funding and handling of waste will be accrued by the state by increasing the costs of household and industrial
waste collection, whereby every producer or owner of waste will have to pay full the commercial price for
waste processing. The initial funding will be provided by the state from the budget. Nothing has been done
in this area in recent years, and that means it will be difficult if not impossible for this strategy to meet the
deadlines it sets out.

Identifying the bodies in charge of activities
The  body in charge is primarily the relevant ministry (state), then all local communities  and commercial
activities which create waste.

Development scenario for investments
The scenario  envisages such waste handling  which is a compromise between the following:
    possible  measures  for  a comparatively rapid and efficient resolution of accumulated problems in
    connection with waste,
    envisaged guidelines and objectives, in keeping with the trends in other European countries,
    economic ability of Slovene society.

In order to deal with the main issues of handling waste, approximately DM 2 billion needs to be secured for
the first stage, just for the  initial investments,  and an additional DM  100 million for the organisational,
administrative and legal objectives.

As far as the dates set out in this paper and the envisaged funding are concerned, they will have to be amended
(at least the dates). This is  in consideration of the fact that the activities which should now be in  their final
stages, have yet to started.

3. NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROGRAMME

The National Environmental Protection  Programme was prepared on the basis of the Environmental  Protection
Act and contains objectives of environmental protection and the rational use of natural goods for a period of
10 years.

The programme's priority objectives are as follows:
    to improve conditions in water environments,
    to establish modem waste handling techniques,
    to preserve and protect biodiversity and genetic pools,
    to strengthen environmental protection institutions in all areas.

                                             153

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)              September 1999


The programme also addresses other objectives, including air, soil and forests, noise, risk, and radiation.

The measures for implementing the national programme include: increased administrative efficiency; research
and development; preparation of environmental protection information systems; harmonisation of Slovene
legislation with the EU legislation; preparation of economic measures; founding of public services; education
and training in environmental protection; encouraging international cooperation.

This project requires enonnous funding and the exact costs of its implementation are not yet clear but,
according to some predictions, at  least DM 500 million a year will be required to carry out the priority-
objectives.

4. CONCLUSION

These three papers paint a picture of the environmental situation and the legislator's, i.e. the relevant
ministry's, desires for change in environmental protection. The only realistic paper, in which all the data is well
substantiated, is the 1996 Environmental Situation Report; while the other two, as far as the dates they set are
concerned, are nothing but wishes and are a long way from being fulfilled.

5. SOURCES

1.  Okolje v Sloveniji 1996 (environmental  report drafted on the basis of Articles 75  and 76  of the
    Environmental Protection Act), Ministry of the Environment and Physical Planning, Nature Protection
    Authority, Ljubljana 1998.
2.  Strateske usmeritve R Slovenije za ravnanje z odpadki (Strategic Guidelines of the Republic  of Slovenia
    on Waste Management) National Assembly Reporter, volume XXR, Ljubljana. 3 October 1996.
3.  Nacionalni program varstva okolja (National Environmental Protection Programme), Ministry of the
    Environment and Physical Planning, Nature Protection Authority, Ljubljana, December 1998.
4.  Alenka Burja, Ne pij  vode na severovzhodu (Don't drink water in the North-east), Delo, Saturday
    supplement, 10 April 1999.
5.  Kemizacija okolja in • ivljenja - do katere meje (Chemisation of the environment and life - to what
    degree?), 1995 European Year of Nature Protection, Slovene Ecological Movement, Ljubljana 1997.
6.  1998 Statistical Yearbook, volume XXXVII, Statistical Office of the Republic of Slovenia, Ljubljana
    1998.
                                             154

-------
 NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)             September 1999


                                            SWEDEN

 1. LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUES

 Finally, we now have legislation that covers remedial issues in Sweden. On 1 January 1999
 new environmental legislation, the Environmental Code, entered into force. The rules from 15 former acts have
 been put together. Remedial issues are gathered under chapter 10.

The purpose of this new legislation is to clarify liability and give the authorities greater opportunity to promote,
 control and steer remedial action. With the new Code, it will be possible to place demands on environmentally
 hazardous activities that have been performed after 30 June 1969. Liability for remedial costs rests primarily
 with the party conducting the activity. In the second instance, it is the landowner who is responsible if he, at
 the time of the purchase of the property, knew about the  pollution or ought to have discovered  it. The
 landowners are only responsible for purchases after 1 January 1999. If several activity operators or landowner
 are deemed responsible, they will normally be jointly liable. The liability for remediation cannot become time-
 barred.

 A party who owns or uses  real property must immediately advise the supervisory authority if pollution is
 discovered at the property. The obligation to provide information also applies even if the area was previously
 considered to be polluted.

 The new legislation  also introduces the official registration of confirmed contaminated sites. The  county
 administrative board must declare an area of land or water to be an environmental hazard if the area is so
 severely polluted that, considering the risk for human health and the environment, it is necessary to lay down
 limitations on the use of land or other precautionary measures.

 In  1997 the Swedish EPA presented guideline  values for 36 contaminants in soil.  Guidelines  for the
 remediation of gas stations, including guideline values for soil and groundwater, are under consideration.

 The Swedish definition of a contaminated site is a site, deposit, land, groundwater or sediment that has been
 contaminated, intentionally or unintentionally, by  industry or some  other activity. The  definition  of
 "contaminated" is that the levels of contamination apparently exceed the local/regional background values.

 After a year, 1998, without any financial means for remedial action, the future now looks considerably brighter.
 For the following four years, the Swedish EPA will receive  SEK 550 million or USD 65 million.

 2. REGISTRATION OF CONTAMINATED SITES

 So far we have  identified about 12,000  potential  sites  in Sweden. We estimate the  total number of
 contaminated sites to be 22,000. Due to our industrial structure,  sites with metallic contaminants dominate.
 Mines with acid mine drainage represent our heaviest and most costly remedial problem. Other problems are
 caused by metal works, iron and steel  works and surface plating facilities. There is also a group of industries
 using  complex  mixtures of metals and persistent organic  substances such as  chloralkali (Hg and
 dioxins/furans); these include gasworks, the pulp and paper industry (Hg and PCB) and wood preservation
 plants  (CCA, Cu, PAH, PCP and dioxins/furans).

 In addition, there is the petroleum industry with oil refineries, oil depots and gas stations which represent the
 largest group by number but on the other hand cause the problems  which are easiest to solve.

 Today we have an unofficial register of identified, suspected sites at the Swedish EPA. This register is only
 open for the environmental authorities. A more developed and regionally based computer system at the county
 administrative boards (CABs) will replace this first database in one to  two years. The  Swedish EPA is
 responsible for the development of this  regionally based site registration data system in order to ensure that
                                             155

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)              September 1999

the regional registers are consistent. The purpose of this database is to provide a basis for regional planning
and the prioritisation of inventories, investigations and remedial work as well as serve as a support in the
ongoing work on licensing and supervision.

With the new Environmental Code, the CABs will be authorised to decide which sites can. with certainty, be
classified as contaminated in an official register. General criteria for this registration will be regulated by law.
This registration can, in certain cases, lead to land use restrictions, obligation to report certain kinds of
activities (like excavation) at the site to the municipality, etc. This information will also be entered into the
national land register. The CABs will also be given the right to decide if and when such a classification should
be annulled.

3. TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME

The Swedish EPA and the Swedish Delegation for  Sustainable Technology are running a cooperation
programme concerning technological development in the field of site remediation. This programme is to act
as a catalyst for the development of new technology in Sweden. It includes a research and development project
being carried out at an industrial site in central Stockholm. Stockholm City, which owns the land, is also
involved in the project. The site, where tar products were previously processed, is contaminated with PAH and
metals. The sediment is also contaminated. The following pilot trials using various treatment methods is being
carried out:

•   Chemical leaching of metals and organic compounds from the sediment - NCC and Raymond and Irina
    Swanson (USA)

•   Biological slurry treatment of the organic compounds in the soil and sediment -Eko Tec (Sweden)

•   Electro-dialysis of metals in the sediment - Jordmiljo Nordic AB and A.S. Bioteknisk Jordrens (Denmark)

•   In-situ geo-oxidation of organic compounds in the soil - Jordmiljo Nordic AB (Denmark)

•   Thermal evaporation of organic compounds and mercury from the soil,  clay and sediment  - Cedeka
    Miljoentreprenad AB, Skanska Anlaggningar AB (Sweden)

•   Thermal evaporation of organic compounds from the soil, clay and sediment - Ragn-Sells Specialavfall
    AB (Sweden) and Ecotechnik Bodem GB (the Netherlands)

•   Thermal evaporation of organic compounds and mercury from the soil - Green Soil Ltd OY (Finland).

•   Soil-washing with the biological treatment of organic compounds and metals in the soil - Gotthard
    Heidemij Marksanering AB (Sweden, the Netherlands).

The trials are expected to be completed and evaluated by the autumn of 1999.

Another study within the cooperation programme concerns chlorinated organic compounds in  soil. The
following four methods are being tested at different sites around the countiy:

•   Vapour injection with vacuum extraction - Daldehog AB (Sweden) and Hedeselskapet (Denmark)

•   Anaerobic and aerobic degradation - Marksanering i Sverige AB and VBB-VIAK (Sweden)

•   Air sparging and vacuum extraction - Rettig varme AB, EkotEc (Sweden)

•   Reactive barriers . Bengtsfors Municipality and VBB-VIAK (Sweden)
                                            156

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)              September 1999
4. REMEDIAL METHODS IN USE

The EPA's policy in the context of remediation is to choose long term solutions that, if possible, solve the
problem once and for all. That means in the first instance, to select methods which destroy the contaminant
through biodegradation or combustion. When this is not possible, as in the case of metals for example,
methods  should be used where the contaminant is concentrated/collected for further treatment  and/or
landfilling. By concentration methods we mean, for example,  soil-washing, soil-  venting and thermal
desorption. Only in the last instance should methods such as containment, immobilisation and landfilling of
untreated residues be selected. This is an application of the BAT (Best Available Technology) principle in the
remedial field.

The second principle that concerns the  choice of technology is the eco-cycle principle. Site remediation has
to do with the rational management of land and water resources.  Methods which enable land and soil to be
re-used are given higher priority man methods which involve the excavation and removal of waste as well as
landfilling.

Landfilling, encapsulation and incineration are still the dominant remediation measures in Sweden. During
1997 two rather large sites, both of which were former wood preservation plants, have  been successfully
remediated using soil-washing. The  trend is  that some kinds of treatment are becoming more and more
common. In particular, biological methods like composting and in-situ methods such as vapour extraction and
bio-venting are becoming more and more frequent.

The state of the art in Sweden is as follows:

Soil-washing - we have three pilot plants and two full-scale plants in Sweden. In addition, mere are three more
full-scale plants planned.

Thermal desorption  - two pilot plants have been tested and one full-scale is under construction.

Composting - we have a great number  of companies dealing with uncontrolled composting, in the open air
without evaporation or leaching control. In controlled composting, we have two companies working with some
kind of on-site static, encapsulated compost.

In-situ methods such as soil vapour extraction, bio-venting and air sparging are used by one company, mostly
for remediating gas stations.

Finally we have a company developing a pilot bio slurry reactor into a  full-scale plant.

The problem in Sweden is that there are still only a small number of remediations carried out. Despite the fact
that there are quite a lot of companies interested in working in this field, the market is still very small.

One bright spot is the initiative from the Swedish Petrol Institute to get the petroleum companies to form an
environmental commission to clean up disused petrol stations. The work will be financed  by a marginal
increase in petrol prices. The aim is that 6,000 petrol stations will be remediated within a 10-year period. This
will surely increase the demands for remedial work and make the market larger, at least for biological methods
and in-situ methods  such as vapour extraction and bio-venting.

Another positive development is the Government's investment in building a new ecological society. Together
with housing, energy and transportation, remedial action is one of the sectors where money will be  spent. USD
700 million will be  spent over 3 years. Local authorities will present plans to the Government, who will
prioritise and allocate the funds. The Swedish EPA is not so involved in these decisions and our funds for the
long-term plans have been cut down to a minimum. This is a general trend in Sweden. The  environmental

                                             157

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)              September 1999

authorities receive less and less money and temporary organisations, often run by politicians, are formed to
administrate regular authority work on an ad hoc basis.

Based on rather few remediations, the conclusion is mat biological treatment, such as composting, should be
used if you have an easily degradable organic contamination as at petrol stations, oil depots and refineries. In-
situ methods such as vapour extraction, bio-venting and air sparging are also useful in some of these cases.
These methods are rather cheap.

Composting could be used for lighter PAH but if you have 4-6 ringed PAH or PCP, a bio slurry reactor is
needed.

As we have a lot of sites with mixed contaminants, metals and organic compounds, soil-washing is a very
useful technology in Sweden. The two full-scale remedies last year worked out very well.

Concerning thermal treatment, we have no experience of full-scale treatment yet but the tests shows that it
could be useful for PAH, Hg, dioxins etc.

5. CONCLUSION

Metals and complex mixtures of metals and persistent  organic compounds are the dominating problem in
Sweden. Acid mine drainage is our major and most costly remedial problem.

The lack of technology has been a great problem but in the last few years we have seen a change for the better.
The interest from treatment companies has increased and today mere are around 15 companies active on the
market. Some of these are developing their technology from the beginning, others are seeking collaboration
with companies from other countries, such as the Netherlands, Denmark or Germany.

The new Environmental Code, the remedial programme for gas stations and the Government's emphatic
financial investment totalling SEK 550 million (USD 65 million) over the next four years will no doubt impart
incisive momentum to both the market and technological development.
                                            158

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)             September 1999


                                        SWITZERLAND

1. LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUES

The political structure of Switzerland is federalist and organised by 26 local authorities, called Cantons.
Political authority for conservation is vested in the Department of the  Environment, Traffic, Energy and
Communication. The Swiss Agency for the Environment, Forests and Landscape, as part of this ministry, is
responsible for preparing laws, ordinances and technical guidelines, and for providing public information.
Environmental protection is implemented by the Cantons by means of emission controls, e.g. in the areas of
waste management, hazardous substances and air pollution control.

Ordinance relating to the remediation of contaminated sites

Based on the Federal Law relating to the Protection of the Environment, amended in 1995, the Ordinance
relating to the remediation of contaminated sites (in force since 1 October 1998) regulates their identification,
assessment and remediation. Implementation of this Ordinance is not at Federal Government level but is
assigned to the Cantons, because of their greater proximity to the environmental problems in question. The
Federal Government implements the Ordinance directly only where areas of Federal interest are concerned,
e.g. military sites, railway installations or airports.  This ensures a systematic approach to the assessment and
remediation of contaminated sites throughout the country. Up until now remedial activities have concentrated
on urgent cases, often discovered in the course of redevelopment.

Swiss Government policy has the following objectives for contaminated  sites:

•   Stopping emissions at source

•   Cooperation between polluters and authorities

•   Legal equality trough harmonised criteria

•   Prevention of new risks.

Ordinance relating to the financing of the remediation of contaminated sites

According to current estimates, the registers of sites polluted by waste will eventually contain 40-50,000 sites.
About 3,000 of these are likely to require remediation carried out within the next 20 to 25 years. The overall
costs will be more than 3.000 million ECU (5,000 million Swiss Francs).

In spite of the clear regulations covering  identification, assessment and remediation in the Ordinance relating
to the remediation of contaminated sites, there  is a danger that considering the high costs, the necessary
remediation of large contaminated sites  are not tackled, but will be left  to future generations to deal with.
Remediation should not be provoked by development, building activities or the presence of enough money;
the main criterion should be the actual hazard presented to the environment. It is the Confederation's aim mat
contaminated sites representing a severe potential danger be rapidly remediated.

In many cases, the person responsible for making remedial action necessary in the first place can bear little or
nothing of the remediation costs. The remaining costs, estimated at 1,200  million ECU, have to be carried by
the Cantons and thus by public taxes. A draft of a fiscal instrument (Ordinance) has been elaborated in order
to give the Cantons financial support.

An amendment (article 32e) to the Federal Law relating to the Protection of the Environment set out the basic
framework for the Ordinance  relating  to the financing of the remediation of contaminated  sites. The
Department of the Environment. Traffic. Energy and Communication has initiated the  procedure  of
consultation for this new Ordinance. The tax is to be levied on the deposition of wastes and takes into account

                                             159

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)             September 1999

the various types of landfill. The rate is limited to a maximum of 20% of the average disposal costs. The
revenue is expressly dedicated to financing remediation, and flows to the Cantons if:

•   Contaminated sites (landfills, industrial sites or sites of accidents) are to be remediated where the polluter
    cannot be identified or is unable to pay; or
•   Landfills are to be remediated on which a significant proportion of the wastes were municipal.
Payment by the Confederation is limited to 40% of the remediation costs.

The estimated remediation costs borne by the Cantons will require annual funds of around 20 million ECU.

Switzerland is not the only country with a fiscal instrument to fund remediation of contaminated sites. The
experience of other countries demonstrates that having to pay a charge for depositing wastes in a landfill is
useful in connection with contaminated sites.  A charge  on oil, derivatives of oil or basic chemicals is not
appropriate for Switzerland. Furthermore it has been shown to be most successful to use the money exclusively
to finance the  remediation of contaminated sites, and not for the support of technologies, employees or
lawsuits.

2. REGISTRATION OF CONTAMINATED SITES

In order to identify the small number of dangerously contaminated sites (-3,000) within the larger number of
polluted sites (40-50,000) a step-by-step investigation is required. First the Cantons must draw up a register
of sites polluted by waste, distinguishing between landfills, industrial and accident sites. These registers will
be made available to the public and must be completed by the Cantons by the year 2003. The registers will be
updated continuously, and the registered sites are prioritised in order to decide which should be investigated
most urgently.  Sites that are completely decontaminated will be deleted from the register.

The owner of a polluted site is obliged to undertake a historical review and technical site investigation based
on a program approved by the authority, hi order to determine whether mere is a need for remediation or
monitoring, or if no further action is necessary, the authority must consider both emissions from the site and
harmful effects to the environment.

A decision to take remedial action will require a site-specific risk analysis based on interactions between the
site and the environment (mainly groundwater, surface water, soil and air) and talcing into account transport
potentials  and  barriers. Intervention values for leachates and air have  been elaborated, based on  human
toxicological considerations, and consistent with the relevant laws concerning water and soil.

No further action is necessary as long as no immissions are detectable and the actual and possible emissions
are below the intervention values. Remediation is required if the actual  and possible emissions exceed any
intervention value and if no long-term retention is guaranteed. Remediation is also needed if immissions can
pollute surface water or groundwater of public interest. In other cases only monitoring is required.

The general objective of remediation is to remove the need for further remediation following the clean-up.
However, other criteria such as technological feasibility, ecological sustainability and the costs of any remedial
action must also be considered. Sites cannot always be returned to their natural state. Sometimes the target
criteria only guarantee the protection and maintenance of the affected environmental media in their current use.

3. TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM

The Federal Law relating to the Protection of the Environment enables the Swiss Agency for the Environment,
Forests and Landscape to support in the future the development of new technologies in all environmental
fields. For this  extended assignment  2 to 2.5  million ECU are available annually.  The development of
installations, treatment methods and technologies to reduce pollution are particularly favoured. The support
is not restricted to certain treatment methods, e.g. recycling technologies,  but is available to all environmental
areas.
                                             160

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)              September 1999


At the moment  there are 3 specific projects for the remediation of contaminated  sites that are under
consideration for finance from this fund. In two of these projects the use of permeable reactive barriers are
being investigated as a remedial method; the contaminants are in one case chlorinated solvents and in the other
chromium. In the third project the treatment is an in situ bioremediation of a site contaminated by mineral oil.

4. REMEDIAL  METHODS IN USE

The predominant remedial method in the approximately 200 remediations so far carried out is the excavation
of the contaminated  material followed by containment of the  site. However, less well-known remedial
technologies, particularly in situ measures, are becoming more acceptable.

Recently a practically-oriented database for the treatment  of contaminated sites was created by the Swiss
Agency forme Environment, Forests and Landscape. This  information system is called IUVA and contains
details of remedial methods as well as data on companies such as remediation specialists and consultancies,
administrative authorities and associations. The database will be complemented with research and development
activities. In addition, IUVA has a list of harmful substances with supplementary information relevant to
contaminated sites (intervention values). Thus, based on the pollution level of a contaminated site, a user of
the IUVA can obtain information on potential remediation companies, suitable remedial methods, or examples
of analogous cases.

5. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES

A program of scientific research into the investigation, remediation and validation of contaminated sites has
been initiated. Most of the roughly 60 research projects are  carried out by the Federal Technical Institutes in
Zurich (ETHZ) and Lausanne (EPFL). Universities and cantonal laboratories also have various projects. Many
of the projects are financially supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (NSF), by other national
institutions or by the Cantons. A few are funded by private  companies. Additional information on the Swiss
research projects can be found on the CARACAS website.

6. CONCLUSIONS

Current Federal policy on the treatment of contaminated sites is guided by the following important principles:

•  Goals for the  treatment of contaminated  sites should be  uniform and valid throughout Switzerland.
•  The authorities work with those directly affected, especially with industry.
•  The contaminated sites should be treated according to objective urgency (hazard to the environment).
•  Remediation  should be carried out rapidly using realistic solutions (principle of coinmensurability); the
   search for perfect solutions, thereby leaving the problem for future generations, must be avoided.
•  Remediation requirements should as far as possible be set according to the environmental situation at the
   time.
•  The remediation should guarantee a permanent stop to  illegal effects, and ensure that the measures are
   sustainable overall.
•  Future contaminated sites  should be  avoided by  the consistent implementation of precautionary
   environmental regulations.
•  Industrial  and commercial contaminated sites are to be remediated as far as possible for future use.
   "Brownfields", and their subsequent replacement with "greenfields", are to be avoided.

The legislator has the difficult task of issuing regulations which makes environmentally legitimate treatment
of contaminated sites possible, and which also ensures that these regulations are acceptable to the population
and to those affected by the remediation.

The registration of sites contaminated with waste is valuable. On the other hand there is still a great need to
investigate the sites  and their possible remediation, which  can in  some  cases  be very cost-intensive.
                                             161

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)              September 1999

Prerequisites must be established so that investigation, and if necessary remediation, can be carried out not just
under pressure from plans for construction, but where it is necessary for purely environmental reasons.  We
hope that the planned Ordinance relating to the financing of the remediation of contaminated sites will provide
significant support to this aim.
                                              162

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)              September 1999


                                            TURKEY

1. LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUES

There is growing recognition of soil and groimdwater pollution problems in Turkey since the enforcement of
the regulation of the Control of Hazardous Wastes in August 1995. The main purpose of the regulation is to
provide a legal framework forme management of hazardous wastes throughout the nation. It basically regulates
prevention of direct or indirect release of hazardous wastes mat can be harmful to  human health and  the
environment, control of production, transportation and exports, technical and administrative standards for
construction and operation of disposal sites, waste recycle, treatment, minimization at  the source, and related
legal and punitive responsibilities. The regulation is applicable not only to hazardous  wastes to be generated
in the future, but also concerns with the existing hazardous wastes and their safe disposal in compliance with
the current regulation within 3 years.

The Control of Hazardous Wastes regulation does not explicitly define the concept  of contaminated sites.
Rather, it defines what a hazardous waste is and provides lists categorizing hazardous wastes based on their
sources, chemical compositions  and accepted  disposal techniques. Thus, any  site  contaminated with or
subjected  to any of these categorized  hazardous wastes can implicitly be defined as a contaminated site.
However,  difficulties arises from the lack of information for most of chemicals in these lists regarding specific
maximum concentration levels (MCLs) or remedial action levels.

Currently, identification of any contaminated site is not based on a certain systematic approach. These sites
are mostly identified after some potential environmental problems become obvious and public as a result of
the efforts of local authorities or concerned  citizens.  However, some current policy developments by  the
Ministry of Environment can make the identification of contaminated sites somewhat more systematic. In this
new policy development, the waste management commission, an administrative body proposed by the Control
of Hazardous Wastes regulation, initiates preparation of industrial waste inventory on a regional basis. Waste
inventory  is planned to be  achieved by requiring all the industry to fill out annual waste declaration forms
revealing the type, amount, composition and the current disposal practice of their wastes. This way, it is
expected that waste generation activities and pollution potentials of industries can be monitored; regionally
effective waste reutilization and recycling programs can be implemented; and finally regional needs for the
type and capacity of waste disposal facilities can be identified. In response to such efforts, an integrated waste
management facility, including a  landfill and  incineration unit for disposal of industrial wastes, is becoming
operational at full scale in heavily industrialized Izmit region.

Another policy development related to identification of contaminated sites is the work progressing towards the
preparation of a "Soil Pollution Contt'oF regulation. It  is expected that this regulation will clarify the existing
confusion over the remedial action and cleanup levels and set a guideline for the selection of appropriate
cleanup technologies for various different types of contaminated soil sites.

2. CONTAMINATED SITES

Same examples of the identified contaminated sites and major soil and groundwater problems associated with
these sites in Turkey are as follows:

•  Beykan Oil Field Site: At mis site, petroleum hydrocarbon pollution of surface soils,  surface- and ground-
   water caused by oil production activities in the Beykan Oil Field is of concern. The Beykan Oil Field is
   enclosed by the watershed of a medium size dam constructed during early-sixties for irrigation purposes.
   Due to recent increases in domestic water supply demand, the dam was considered as a potential resource
   to meet the increasing water demand in the area. A total of 38 oil producing wells are placed within the
   various protection zones surrounding the dam's  reservoir; 13 of them being in the immediate vicinity, that
   is within the first 300 in of the reservoir shore called "'absolute protection zone". Oil spills at these wells
   and along pipelines connecting wells and other facilities are considered as potential pollution sources
                                             163

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)              September 1999

    effecting the reservoir water quality. Existing spill records revealed that, during the peak oil production
    years, an annual average spill volume of 95 tons  for the entire field, resulting in an average  TPH
    concentration of 20300 ppm in contaminated soils. As a consequence, contaminant mass leaching to the
    reservoir from soils contaminated by oil spills is viewed as a primary concern for reservoir water quality.
    In addition to soil and possible reservoir water pollution problems, another primary concern at this site is
    pollution of the Midyat aquifer due to injection of nearly 20 Million mJ of formation water between the
    years of 1971 and 1996. Injected formation water contains high amounts of brine (with a chloride
    concentration of 3000 mg/L and TDS concentration of 6,500 mg/L) and some emulsified oil (with a
    concentration of 500 mg/1). The Midyat aquifer overlies the Beykan Oil Field and a primary source of
    drinking water supply forme nearby community. For this site, studies concerning the assessment of the
    extent of contamination and appropriate remedial measures are currently underway.

•   Incirlik PCB Contaminated Soils Site: At this site, soil contamination by PCB oil leaking from storage
    drums at a military reutilization yard was occurred during the operation of the reutilization yard between
    1970 and 1988. An excavation of 0.5 meters deep was made in October 1991, leaving the excavated soil
    stored in approximately 300 drums and in a pile. Estimated PCB contaminated soil volume is  1,600 m3.
    Site characterization investigations revealed that site soils are high in clay content (65 %) and potential
    for groundwater contamination is low. PCB concentrations measured in composite contaminated soil
    samples range up  to 750 ppm. For remediation of contaminated soils, various alternatives  are being
    evaluated including incineration and in- situ/ex-situ solidification/stabilization.

•   Chromium  Ore  Processing Residue Dump Site: At  two of these sites,  soil and groundwater
    contamination by Cr(VI) leaching from chromium ore processing residue (COPR) is of concern. COPR
    is produced by a chromate production factory providing mostly the needs of learner tanning industry.
    During the  early production  years, CORP is  dumped  at  a temporary dump site  near factory. The
    unprocessed row chromite ore (FeCr2O4) contains nearly 45 % of chromium oxide (Cr2O3). After a
    roasting process of chromite ore by adding Na2CO3 and CaCO3 constituents, COPR contains nearly 25,000
    ppm of total chromium. Due to  high  chromium content, COPR is  partly recycled  by mixing with
    chromium ore at a ratio of roughly 1:20. The current chromate production technology used yields
    approximately three (3) tons of COPR to produce one (1) ton of chromate. Currently, some research work
    is underway to evaluate soil and groundwater pollution potential of land-disposed COPR and to develop
    technical guidelines for appropriate management of COPR related wastes and remediation  of COPR
    contaminated soils.

3. REMEDIAL METHODS AND RD&D

Currently, mere  are no reliable and comprehensive case study based statistics or data on remedial methods and
technologies used for cleanup of soil and groundwater in Turkey. Regulatory aspects of acceptable remedial
methods and technologies are provided by the Control of Hazardous Wastes regulation, which specifies
acceptable  remedial and/or disposal methods  for a given type of contaminant group.  In the Control of
Hazardous Wastes regulation, acceptable  methods for  a large number of contaminant group is given as
physical, chemical and biological treatment without stating the specific name of the method. However, it
clearly states mat use of remedial technologies is a must for wastes containing a large group of contaminants.
Currently, there is no official knowledge regarding the widespread past use of particular technologies for soil
and groundwater cleanup in Turkey. Most probably the remedial technologies that will be used for the Beykan,
Incirlik and COPR Dump sites are going to be the first site specific examples and set precedence, in terms of
both cost and performance, for cleanup in other similar sites.

There is a pressing need for research and development of soil and groundwater cleanup technologies in Turkey.
The number of soil and groundwater remediation research projects supported financially by the Turkish State
Planning Organization and other governmental institutions is increasing. For example, a project regarding the
performance assessment of solidification/stabilization (S/S) technology for remediation of a large group of
wastes (e.g., soils, mining residue and paper and pulp industry sludge) containing organic contaminants (PCB
and AOX) and heavy metals has been initiated. The main purpose of this project is to investigate the reliability
                                             164

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)              September 1999

of S/S technology for remediation of certain waste groups and provide technical and economical guidance for
its field scale applications. This year the General Directorate of State Hydraulic Works has initiated two pilot
projects to update hydrogeologic investigations of two major groundwater basins. The main objectives are to
develop comprehensive data base and appropriate groundwater management plans  using recent technologies
such as GIS, RS and advanced numerical groundwater modeling and to set the standards for similar studies
for the other major basins.

4. CONCLUSIONS

There  is  a growing recognition  of soil and groundwater degradation problems in Turkey. Because the
enforcement of hazardous waste regulations is relatively new, some difficulties in the identification of soil and
groundwater contamination sites remain unresolved. Recent regulatory efforts are helpful for identification of
these sites contaminated as a result of past activities. In the near future a considerable increase in the number
of registered contaminated sites is expected.

Turkey presently relies heavily on surface water resources to satisfy water supply demands mainly because of
relative abundance of surface waters resources. Groundwater constitutes a relatively small component of total
available resources (17 per cent) but it represents a significant portion (27 per cent)  of total water withdrawal.
However, due to growing water demand parallel  to rapid population and industrial growth, an increasing
demand for food production, urban expansion and accelerated degradation of surface water quality, protection
of clean  groundwater resources  as well as remediation of contaminated soil  and groundwater  sites are
becoming environmental issues of high priority.  The sustainable development of groundwater resources
requires proper waste treatment for communities and industrial plants. Groundwater is the major source of
drinking  water supply and as such needs to be fully protected and allocated only for high quality uses.
Although legislation on groundwater exists, their protection appears to be neglected at least in certain areas.
With the spread of irrigation practices, the pollution threat to groundwater is also increasing.  To  date,
unsatisfactory efforts has been made to protect groundwater from the increasing variety of potential pollution
sources, such as agricultural chemicals, septic tanks, and waste dumps. The control of soil and groundwater
contamination is essential to Turkey's on-going reliance on groundwater resources for potable water.

The  management of hazardous wastes in Turkey is inadequate to  ensure proper handling and treatment.
Industrial waste, particularly hazardous waste, has grown proportionately with industrial production. Treatment
facilities  are minimal and their  disposal is usually haphazard.  They pose  serious dangers for  soil  and
groundwater and in some cases for public health.  The legal gap has to a certain extent been filled with the
regulation of the Control of Hazardous Wastes. Minimization of the generation and availability of facilities
for proper storage and disposal of hazardous wastes has been embodied in this Turkish regulation. The policies
are being strengthened by the application of such mechanisms of industrial waste management as the full
implementation  of environmental impact assessment for new proposals,  the  requirement that  waste
management programs be prepared and implemented by existing industries, and the encouragement of waste
re-use.
                                             165

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)             September 1999
                                     UNITED KINGDOM

This paper is intended to be an update to the Tour de Table paper at the Vienna Meeting of the Pilot Study in
February 1998.

1. LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUES

At the previous meeting the Tour de Table paper presented the background to UK policy on land affected by
contamination and a description of the "contaminated land provisions" of Part  IIA of the Environmental
Protection Act 1990 (as introduced by section 57 of the Environment Act 1995). Part IIA of EPA'90 is
modelled on the existing statutory nuisance provisions and will replace them in respect of contaminated land.

In July 1998 the UK Government announced the outcome of its Comprehensive Spending Review and its
implications for the Environment Protection Programme of the Department of the Environment, Transport and
the Regions (DETR) and the Scottish Office. The Government pledged to bring into force Part HA of EPA
?90 in the summer of 1999 and made available additional resources to local authorities and the environmental
agencies  (i.e. the  Environment Agency  and the Scottish  Environment Protection  Agency) to  assist
implementation of the new regime. In total £55.7 million over the next three years was made available to local
authorities in England,  Scotland, and Wales to develop their inspection strategies, carry out site investigations
and take forward any  enforcement action.  The Government also  announced that £47 million was to be
available to local authorities and the environmental agencies to tackle remediation of orphan sites.

2. TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES

In 1998, the  Government also announced  the launch of the CLAIRE initiative (Contaminated Land:
Applications in Real Environments) [1]. The objective of CLAIRE is to establish a network of test sites to
research and demonstrate cost-effective techniques for the investigation and remediation of land affected by
contamination in  the  UK.  CLAIRE  has the  backing of a consortium of UK stakeholders including
Government,  regulators, the research community, and industry.  CLAIRE will  be funded by a group of
industrial and public sector partners who will  provide core funding  for the organisation.  This will be
supplemented by project fees, charged as appropriate to the different groups who operate projects on CLAIRE
sites.

The need for CLAIRE arises from two important factors:
•  The increasing pressure to reduce the amount of "greenfield" land used for development in the UK.  One
   solution is the re-use of "brownfield" sites, abandoned urban and commercial land that is currently
   derelict, and in many cases also potentially contaminated.
•  Pressure on the conventional approaches to  remediation of land contamination such as excavation  and
   disposal to landfill through developing legislation and policy and increased cost. Despite this, the use of
   many process-based technologies remains low, primarily because of the perceived high cost of such
   treatments and concerns about their technological risk.

CLAIRE aims to address the key issue of how to get over the information barrier limiting the use of process-
based remediation technologies in the UK. The requirement is to understand the impact of contamination and
demonstrate the practical application of cost-effective but sustainable solutions that extend the range of sites
for which treatment is feasible and reduce the technological risk involved. This requires research, development
and demonstration of treatment technologies at a field-scale, comparing the effectiveness of the treatment
against natural processes, and men disseminating information about the approach to a community of relevant
stakeholders.

CLAIRE will establish a network of independently owned test sites, which will be representative of land
contamination in the UK.  CLAIRE will facilitate the use of this network by independent projects that either
demonstrate the application of specific technologies to these  sites, or research new approaches that may offer
                                            166

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)
September 1999
improved remediation solutions. CLAIRE will collate, analyse and disseminate the information resulting from
these projects.

3. REMEDIAL METHODS IN USE

For a number of years the anecdotal evidence has pointed to the fact mat the UK land remediation market is
dominated by conventional engineering approaches, mainly excavation and disposal, mixing/regrading, in-
ground barrier and cover systems.  However, there is also increasing evidence of the uptake of process-based
technologies such as ex situ  bioremediation (mainly biopiles) and in situ techniques such as soil vapour
extraction, air sparging and their bioremediation counterparts.

There have been several studies looking at the use of remedial approaches in the UK [2,3,4]. However, none
of these have attempted to collect information across the wide spectrum of the land  remediation market,
focusing on the economic market worth of the companies involved and not the particular reason for/types of
strategy implemented.

In January this year, the Environment Agency launched a project looking to survey the remediation market
over the last  three years in order to provide a detailed snap-shot of the current commercially available
techniques and the situations in which they are/are not used. The Agency expects the survey to be completed
in the autumn 1999.

Research and Development Activities

Table 1 lists a number of completed, on-going, and proposed R&D projects related to the remediation of land
affected by contamination funded by the environmental agencies and the  research councils.

       Table 1: Recent UK R&D Projects on remediation of land affected by contamination
                                  (not intended to be inclusive).
PROJECT
STATUS
RESEARCH COUNCILS
Assessment of in situ bioavailability of heavy
metals and impacts on the bioremediation of
persistent organic pollutants in soil
Cyanide biodegradation: a model for the
development of molecular probes for optimisation
of bioremediation
Investigating novel xenobiotic-metabolising p450
mPhanerochaete chrysosporium: a white-rot
fungus used in bioremediation
Penetration of dense non -aqueous pollutants into
deep Triassic sandstone aquifers
Hydro-biological controls on transport and
remediation of organic pollutants
Predicting the potential for natural attenuation of
organic pollutants in groundwater
Integrated assessment and modelling of soil
contaminant behaviour and impact at remediable
urban sites
Funded by BBSRC at the University of Aberdeen.
Three year study (1/97 until 1/00). Part of
Environmental Biotechnology Programme.
Funded by BBSRC at the University of Oxford.
Three year study (1 1/98 until 1 1/01). Part of
Environmental Biotechnology Programme.
Funded by BBSRC at the University of
Aberystwyth. Three year study (5/98 until 5/01).
Funded by EPSRC/NERC at the University of
Sheffield. Part of Waste and Pollution
Management Programme.
Funded by EPSRC/NERC at the University of
London. Part of Waste and Pollution
Management Programme.
Funded by EPSRC/NERC at the University of
Sheffield. Part of Waste and Pollution
Management Programme.
Funded by NERC at the University of Edinburgh.
Part of Urban Regeneration and the Environment
Programme.
                                             167

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)
                                  September 1999
Studies into metal speciation and bioavailability
to assist risk assessment and remediation of
brownfield sites in urban areas
Funded by NERC at the University of London.
Part of Urban Regeneration and the Environment
Programme.	
In situ sensing of the effect of remediation on
available metal fluxex in contaminated land
Funded by NERC at the University of Lancaster.
Part of Urban Regeneration and the Environment
Programme.	
Bacterial biosensors to screen in situ
bioavailability, toxicity and biodegradation
potential of xenobiotic pollutants in soil
Funded by NERC at the University of Aberdeen.
Three year project (10/96 until 10/99). Part of
Environmental Diagnostics Programme.	
Biodegradation of organic pollutants in the
unsaturated zone of aquifers
Funded by NERC at the University of Sheffield.
Eighteen month project (3/98 until 11/99). Part of
Environmental Diagnostics Programme.	
ENVIRONMENT AGENCY
Cost-benefit analysis in remediation of
contaminated land
To provide advice on assessing the costs and
benefits of different remedial techniques as part of
a selection process	
Completed project in LQ R&D for 1998/99.
Sustainability of remedial approaches for land
contamination
To provide guidance on assessing the wider
environmental effect of different remedial
strategies as part of a selection process	
On-going project in LQ R&D for 1998/99.
Validation of remedial treatments
To develop guidance for the verification of
different remedial techniques to enable
performance to be established during remediation
and after works have been completed	
On-going project in LQ R&D for 1998/99.
Guidance on the protection of housing on
contaminated land
To provide good practice advice in respect of
remediation of land contamination and its return
to beneficial use for the purposes of housing.
On-going project in LQ R&D for 1998/99.
Establishing woodland on contaminated land
To consider the factors affecting the suitability of
contaminated sites for establishment of woodland.
 To provide guidance on woodland establishment
for the rehabilitation of land contamination.
Proposed new start for LQ R&D in 1999/00.
Field study of the performance of cover systems
for land remediation
To provide baseline field evidence for the long
term performance of cover systems to improve
regulatory confidence in their appropriate
application.	
Proposed new start for LQ R&D in 1999/00.
Validation of remedial performance: solidification
and stabilisation
To provide specific guidance on appropriate
performance assessment criteria and verification
protocols for solidification and stabilisation
techniques in land remediation.	
Proposed new start for LQ R&D in 1999/00.
                                             168

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)
                                September 1999
Guidance on monitoring of long term
performance of remedial treatments for land
contamination
To provide guidance on the monitoring
requirements for land remediation	
Proposed new start for LQ R&D in 1999/00.
SCOTLAND AND NORTHERN IRELAND FORUM FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH
Development of methods to establish remedial
targets for the protection of human health and
ecosystems.
On-going study; expected to be completed by
Autumn 1999.
CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY RESEARCH AND INFORMATION ASSOCIATION
Contaminated land: in-house training material
To produce training package aimed at the
construction industry to raise awareness of the
application of a range of remedial techniques.
On-going project.
Guidance on clean-up technologies for
contaminated soil and groundwater: biological,
physical and solidification / stabilisation
treatments
To provide good practice guidance on the
selection and implementation of certain categories
of process-based technologies.	
On-going project.
Contaminated land: ecological management
techniques
To examine how the introduction and
management of fauna and flora can be used in
both remediation and ecotoxicological risk
assessment of contaminated land.
Proposed new start 1999/00.
Aftercare management of redeveloped sites
To provide guidance on the long-term monitoring
and control of environmental contaminants.
Proposed new start 1999/00.
Notes

BBSRC (Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council), EPSRC (Engineering and
Physical Sciences Research Council). NERC (Natural Environment Research Council) can be
contacted at Polaris House, North Star Avenue, Swindon, Wiltshire SN2 1UH, UK.

Information on the LQ (Land Quality) R&D Programme of the Environment Agency can be obtained
from Ms Jo Jeffries, LQ Management Support Officer, Olton Court, 10 Warwick Road, Olton, Solihull
B92 7HX, UK.

Information on the SNIFFER programme can be obtained from Dr Paula Woolgar, SEPA, Erskine
Court, The Castle Business Park, Stirling, FK9 4TR, UK.

Information on CIRIA programme can be obtained from Dr Joanne Kwan, 6 Storey's Gate,
Westminster, London, SW1P 3AU, UK.
                                          169

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)              September 1999

5. REFERENCES

[1]     CLAIRE (1998) Contaminated Land: Applications in Real Environments. Prospectus "98. For further
       information contact, Mr Charles Smith, c/o Phoenix, Fairbank House, 27 Ashley Road, Altrincham,
       Cheshire WAI4 2DP, UK.

[2]     Timothy, S. (1992) Contaminated Land: Market and Technology Issues. Centre for Exploitation of
       Science and Technology, 5 Bemers Road. London, Nl OPW.

[3]     MSI Marketing Research for Industry Ltd (1996) MSI Data Report: Contaminated Land Treatment:
       UK. Published by MSI Marketing Research for Industry Ltd, Viscount House, River Lane, Saltney,
       Chester CH4 8QY, UK.

[4]     DETR (1998) International Review of the State of the Art in Contaminated Land Treatment
       Technology Research and a Framework for Treatment Process Technology Research in the UK.
       Volume 1-4.  Available for viewing at  the Department of the Environment, Transport, and  the
       Regions, Main Library, Floor 2, Ashdown House, 123 Victoria Street, London, SW1E 6DE.
                                           170

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)             September 1999


                               UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

1. LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUES

Three different federal programs provide the authority to  respond to threatened  releases  of hazardous
substances  that endanger public health or the environment: (1) In  response to a growing concern about
contaminated sites,  Congress passed the  Comprehensive Environmental  Response, Compensation, and
Liability Act (CERCLA) in 1980.  Commonly known as Superfund, the program under mis law is the central
focus of federal efforts to clean up releases of hazardous substances at abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous
waste sites. The program is funded, in part, by a trust fund based on  taxes on the petroleum and other basic
organic and inorganic chemicals. (2) The second program is directed at corrective action at currently operating
industrial facilities.  This  program is authorized by the Resource Conservation and  Recovery Act of 1980
(RCRA) and its subsequent amendments. This law also regulates the  generation,  treatment, storage and
disposal of hazardous waste at industrial facilities. RCRA corrective action sites tend to have the same general
types of waste  as Superfund sites, and environmental problems are generally less severe than at Superfund
sites; although some RCRA facilities have corrective action problems that could equal or exceed those of many
Superfund sites.  (3) The third cleanup program, also authorized by RCRA, addresses  contamination resulting
from leaks and spills (primarily petroleum products) from underground storage tanks (USTs). This law has
compelled cleanup activities at many UST sites. By the February of  1999, over 385,000 confirmed releases
had been reported, over 327,000 cleanups initiated,  and over 211,000 cleanups completed.

Implementation of Hazardous Waste  Cleanup Legislation

Each cleanup program has a formal process for identifying, characterizing, and cleaning up contaminated sites.
 These processes generally involve joint implementation with state agencies and the involvement of various
groups,  such as local government agencies, local residents,  businesses, and environmental public interest
groups.  Superfund is administered by EPA and the states under the authority of the CERCLA. The procedures
for implementing the provisions of CERCLA substantially affect those used by other federal and state cleanup
programs.   These procedures are spelled out in the National Oil  and Hazardous Substances Pollution
Contingency Plan, commonly referred to as the National Contingency Plan (NCP). The NCP outlines the steps
that EPA and other federal agencies must follow in responding to "releases" of hazardous substances or oil into
the environment. Although the terminology may differ from one program to another, each  follows a process
more-or-less similar to this one. Thus, in addition to comprising a defined single program, activities in the
Superfund program substantially influence the implementation of the other remediation programs.

RCRA assigns the responsibility for corrective action to facility owners and operators and authorizes EPA to
oversee  corrective action. Unlike Superfund, RCRA responsibility is delegated to sates.  As of the end of
1998, EPA  has authorized 33 states and territories to implement the RCRA corrective action. The processes
for characterizing and remediating RCRA corrective action sites are analogous to those used for Superfund
sites, although  the specific terminology and details differ.

The UST regulations require tank owners to monitor the status of their facilities and immediately report leaks
or spills to the regulatory authority, which usually is the state. Cleanup requirements generally are
similar to those under RCRA corrective action and are entirely overseen by state agencies.

Anticipated Policy Developments.

The nature and scope of remediation policies are driven largely by federal and state requirements and public
and private expenditures.  A number of legislative and regulatory initiatives may affect the operation of the
Superfund,  RCRA corrective action, and UST programs. Some changes to the Superfund program have been
implemented under EPA administrative reforms. As debate continues on changes to Superfund, there has been
recent interest in amending the RCRA law. EPA and Congress  agree the pace of RCRA cleanups should be
increased and proposals are being considered to revise the law to exempt remediation wastes from certain
                                            171

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)              September 1999

hazardous waste management requirements, streamline the permitting process, and modify land disposal
restrictions.  In the meantime, EPA is launching an initiative to expedite cleanups through new guidance,
rulemaking and public outreach. The Corrective Action program has set goals for the  1700 high priority
facilities which include  control of human exposure  at 95 percent of sites,  and control of ground water
migration at 70 percent of facilities by the year 2005.

There is widespread and growing interest in using risk assessment to determine cleanup priorities, as may be
done under the Risk Based Corrective Action initiative in the UST program. There is also increasing interest
in the issue of bioavailability of contaminants as an alternative to chemical concentrations alone to set cleanup
standards. Much scientific work and consensus-building has yet to be completed on this issue.

Also, "Brownfields" initiatives have become prominent at federal and state levels.  Brownfields are abandoned,
idled, or under-used industrial and commercial facilities where expansion or redevelopment is complicated by
real of perceived environmental contamination.  Estimates range from  100,000 to 450,000 such sites in the
Unites States. A growing realization in their great potential has heightened interest in their cleanup and
redevelopment. EPA has funded 250 Brownfield Assessment Pilots and 16 Showcase Communities projects
to stimulate work in this area. The Assessment Pilots are funded at up to $200,000 to local communities to
chart their own course toward revitalization.  The pilots are seen as catalysts for change in  local communities,
and often spur community involvement in local land use decision-making. A $1.5 billion Brownfields tax
incentive has been enacted to further encourage cleanup and redevelopment.

2. IDENTIFICATION  OF CONTAMINATED SITES

Almost half a million sites with potential contamination have been reported to state or federal authorities, based
on a 1996 assessment. Of these, about 217,000 still require remediation for which contracts have  not been
issued.  Almost 300,000 other  sites were either cleaned up or were found to require no further action.
Regulatory authorities have identified most of the contaminated sites. Nevertheless, new ones continue to be
reported each year, but at a declining rate. The data on number of sites come from disparate sources because
these sites are not all registered in one data repository. EPA maintains detailed data on Superfund  sites and
summary information for RCRA corrective action and UST sites.  The states and other federal  agencies
generally maintain separate records of the sites for which they are responsible.  It is estimated mat the cost of
remediating the 217,000 sites will be about $187 billion in 1996 dollars, and that it will take at least several
decades to completely remediate all the identified sites.

3. REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGIES

Historical Remedial Technology Use in the U.S.

The most comprehensive information on technology use  at waste sites is available for the Superfund program.
 Although they represent a small percentage  of all contaminated sites, technology selection is representative
of other hazardous waste sites.  After reauthorization in 1986, most remedies involved  some treatment of
contaminated soil, as opposed to containment  or off-site disposal. However, since 1993 mere has been a steady-
decrease in the percentage of sites selecting some treatment. In 1996, the number of containment or off-site
disposal projects exceeded the number of source control treatment  remedies chosen for the first time since
1986. When treatment is selected, there is a trend toward greater use of in-situ processes. In 1996, in-situ
technologies made up 66 percent of source control technologies in the Superfund program.  Because mere is
no excavation, these technologies pose a reduced risk  from exposure and can result in considerable  cost
savings,  especially for large sites.  Also, these  processes have benefited from recent advances in site
characterization technologies.

The most frequently selected treatment technologies for source control have been soil vapor extraction (SVE),
solidification/stabilization and incineration.  These technologies are  followed by bioremediation and thermal
desorption. Three-quarters of these remedial projects solely address organics, while the remainder address
either metals  alone or in  combination with organics.

                                             172

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)              September 1999


Ground water is contaminated at 70 percent of Superfund sites.  Despite recent advances. 89 percent of
remedies selected for controlling ground water plumes rely on conventional pump-and-treat technologies, 6
percent use in situ treatment in addition to pump-and-treat, and 5 percent utilize in situ technologies alone.
 The most frequently selected processes include air sparging, bioremediation. and dual-phase extraction. Many
of the treatment technologies have only recently been selected and much work is underway to develop and test
new processes.  Figure 1 provides a qualitative illustration of pilot- and full-scale activity for some of the most
prominent innovative plume management processes. Permeable reactive barriers are receiving a great deal of
interest. Contrary to the conventional model for new technology development, there has been a rush to install
full-scale reactive walls prior to completing pilot-scale testing. Early applications involved zero-valent iron
to treat chlorinated solvents. Research and demonstration is focusing on materials to treat other contaminants
such as chromium, polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs).  and radionuclides.  In addition, there are
evaluations of installation methods and degradation rates for the treatment materials.  For phytoremediation
and bioremediation of chlorinated solvents, most activity is directed to pilot-scale testing. Natural attenuation
has been used extensively to address petroleum contamination from underground storage tanks.  This approach
relies on microbiologic  and abiotic processes.  It is also being selected at hazardous waste sites, but primarily
as a final polishing step as opposed to a sole remedy for a site.

Control of ground water plumes alone cannot always meet desired cleanup goals because of the presence of
 NAPLs. Figure 2 is another status diagram for the three most prominent dense non-aqueous phase liquid
(DNAPL) technologies. Oxidation is frequently used by a limited number of vendors at full-scale, primarily
for  petroleum contamination.  Otherwise, with a few notable exceptions,  there is relatively little field
demonstration activity for either surfactant and cosolvent flushing or thermal vaporization and mobilization
processes. This is an important shortcoming due to the pervasiveness of the DNAPL problem.

Trends and Anticipated Remedial Technology Use

As part of the quest for more efficient and cost-effective site remediation technologies,  a few  subject areas
are  particularly worthy  of note at this time.  These represent some of the focus areas in greatest need of new
technology.

The presence of DNAPLs (dense non-aqueous  phase liquids) is probably the single  most important factor
affecting our ability to  attain cleanup levels in ground water. Despite relatively few  projects employing
DNAPL treatment technologies, very important results were reported using steam extraction at a wood treating
site in Visalia, California. Pumping and treating was removing about 10 pounds of creosote per week. Using
in situ steam enhanced thermal treatment, approximately one million pounds of DNAPL was recovered in the
first year of operation. These  results are generating some optimism in terms of our ability to address prevalent
DNAPL problems. This summer there will be a concurrent evaluation of three technologies to treat a TCE
(trichloroethylene) DNAPL problem resulting from a spill at an old launch pad at Cape Canaveral, Florida.
 The project, led by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration with support from the Air Force, DOE
and EPA, should provide comparative data for the three selected in situ processes: six-phase thermal heating,
steam injection and oxidation

Another challenge  is  the difficulty  of accurately  locating DNAPL contamination in the subsurface
environment.  Current site characterization methods are often unable to locate the complete DNAPL mass
which can lead to poorly informed remedy selections, inadequate remedial designs, and  ineffective cleanups
that must undergo costly re-evaluation and redesign. We need to  answer the question "How can subsurface
DNAPLs be reliably located through direct or indirect methods?"

There is a strong interest in  bringing more efficiency to remediation efforts through use of optimization
techniques.  One way we can do this is by increasing the efficiency of long-term monitoring and remedial
system performance for technologies such as pump and treat systems. Newly available software models have
helped researchers demonstrate that costs and cleanup times can be significantly reduced by temporary
activation and inactivation of pumping wells. This is an area capable of producing substantial savings.

                                             173

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)              September 1999


As an alternative to pump and treat systems, monitored natural attenuation is receiving a lot of attention.
Although natural attenuation offers significant advantages, there are some important uncertainties about
attenuation rates and endpoints. EPA recently issued a final guideline on this process which emphasize the
need for source control and rigorous long-term monitoring.  Successful monitoring programs need to be
demonstrated, perhaps using new sensor technology.

A significant new challenge is resulting from the emergence of a new contaminant, MTBE (the gasoline
additive methyl tertiary butyl ether), which is being found with alanning frequency in ground water supplies
around the country. This constituent is difficult to treat at the wellhead and in situ.

4. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, AND DEMONSTRATION

Federal agencies currently are coordinating several technology development and commercialization programs.
 DOE is spending $274 million in Fiscal Year 1998 to develop new environmental cleanup technologies. A
recent DOE report described 15 new technologies, scheduled to be available by 2000, that may lead to cost
savings in cleaning up DOE sites. These technologies are specific examples of the types of technologies that
DOE expects to need in the near future, such as bioremediation, electrokinetics, and biosorption of uranium.

DOD has several  technology research and  development programs targeted at helping commercialize
remediation technologies.  The Environmental Security Technology Certification Program (ESTCP) is
designed to promote the demonstration and validation of the most promising innovative technologies that target
DOD's most urgent environmental needs. It is funded at $15 million per year. The Strategic Environmental
Research and Development Program (SERDP) is a joint program with DOD, DOE, and EPA—funded at $61.8
million per year—which devotes  31  percent  of its  resources to remediation and  site  characterization
technologies. In 1998, the Advanced Applied Technology Demonstration Facility program concluded after
sponsoring demonstrations of 12 technologies for DOD at a cost of $20 million. DOD's high priority cleanup
technology needs include: detection, monitoring and modeling (primarily related to unexploded ordnance
[UXO] and DNAPLS); treatment for soil, sediment, and sludge (primarily related to UXO, white phosphorous
contaminated sediments, inorganics, explosives in soil, explosives/organic contaminants in sediments);
groundwater treatment (explosives, solvents, organics, alternatives to pump-and-treat, and DNAPLs); and
removal of UXO on land and under water.

Cooperative public-private initiatives are particularly important because they focus on processes that private
"problem holders" view as most promising forme future.  The involvement of technology users helps to assure
mat the processes selected for development reflect actual needs and have a high potential for future application.
 Led by EPA, the Remediation Technologies Development Forum (RTDF) is a consortium of partners from
industry, government,  and academia, who share the common goal of developing more effective, less costly
hazardous waste characterization and treatment technologies.  RTDF  achieves this goal by  identifying high
priority needs for remediation technology development.  EPA helps to develop partnerships between federal
agencies (such as DOD and DOE) and private site owners (responsible  parties, owners/operators) for the joint
evaluation of remediation technologies.  The purpose of this program is to create a demand among potential
users of new technologies by allowing, the end-users of the technologies to be involved throughout the
demonstration process. The program is organized around seven action teams which are  co-chaired by a
government and industry representative.   Information is  available from the  RTDF  home page  at
http://www.frtr.org.

Agencies of the Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable (including DOE, DOD and EPA) are involved
in an ongoing effort to collect and distribute cleanup cost and performance data. The case studies  aid the
selection and use of more cost-effective remedies by documenting experience from actual field applications.
 Recently, the  Roundtable announced publication  of over 86 new  studies of full-scale remediation and
demonstration projects. This added to 54 studies which were published on two previous occasions.  To better
access this data, the Roundtable has improved it's web site (http://www.frtr.gov) to provide a convenient search
capability.  The Federal agencies coordinated their individual documentation efforts by using standardized

                                             174

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)
             September 1999
procedures to capture their cleanup experience. These procedures are contained in an Interagency Guide which
provides a recommended format for documenting cost, performance, and matrix and operational parameters
for 29 specific technologies.

5. CONCLUSIONS

Legislative, regulatory and programmatic changes may alter the nature and sequence of cleanup work done
at Superfund, DOD, and DOE sites. No major reauthorization of the Superfund program is anticipated and
EPA will continue implementing administrative reforms and refining of improving them where necessary.
EPA does, however, support new provisions that would provide targeted liability relief to qualified parties such
as prospective purchasers, innocent landowners, contiguous property  owners, and small municipal waste
generators and transporters.

After a significant increase in the selection of newer treatment technologies—such as SVE, thermal desorption,
and bioremediation—in the early 1990s, the selection of several technologies has leveled offer decreased in
the past two years, and the selection of containment has become more common.

New technologies offer the  potential to be more cost-effective than conventional  approaches.  In situ
technologies, in particular, are in large demand because they are usually less expensive and more acceptable
than above-ground options. Federal agencies are actively involved in developing and demonstrating new
treatment and site characterization technologies.  Various forms of partnering are  instrumental in increasing
the efficiency and effectiveness of these efforts.
        High Activity
        Moderate Activity
        Low Activity
                                    Pilot-Scale
Full-Scale
    Permeable Reactive
    Barriers
    Phytoremediation
    Bioremediation of
    Chlorinated Solvents
                                                         aerobic
                                                         anaerobic
    Natural Attenuation
                                           175

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)
                               September 1999
                              COUNTRY REPRESENTATIVES
                                          Directors
Stephen C. James (Co-Director)
National Risk Management Research Laboratory
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
26 Martin Luther King Drive
Cincinnati, Ohio 45268
United States
tel: 513-569-7877
fax:513-569-7680
e-mail: iames.steveffflepamail.epa.gov
Walter W. Kovalick, Jr. (Co-Director)
Technology Innovation Office
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
401 M Street SW (5102G)
Washington, DC 20460
United States
tel: 703-603-9910
fax: 703-603-9135
e-mail: kovalick.waltenfi;epamail.epa.gov
                                      Co-Pilot Directors
Volker Franzius
Umweltbimdesamt
Bismarckplatz 1
D-14193 Berlin
Germany
tel: 49/30-8903-2496
fax: 49/30-8903-2285 or-2103
e-mail:  volker.franziiisifi;uba.de
  H. Johan van Veen
  TNE/MEP
  P.O. Box 342
  7800 AN Apeldoorn
  The Netherlands
  tel: 31/555-493922
  fax: 31/5 5 5-493 921
  e-mail: h.i.vanveen:fi:mep .tno.nl
                                   Country Representatives
Natalya Tadevosyan
Division of Hazardous Substances Registration
and Control
Ministry of Natur Protection
35, Moskovian Strasse
375002 Yerevan
Armenia
tel: +37/42-538-838
fax: +37/42-533-372
e-mail: feminiffijnature.am

Gillian King Rodda
Manager, Contaminated Sites
Environment Protection Group
Environment Australia
PO Box E305
Kingston ACT 2604
Australia
tel: 61-2-6274-1114
fex: 61-2-6274-1164
e-mail: gillian.king.rodda/fiea.gov.au
  Nora Meixner
  Federal  Ministry of  Environment,  Youth  and
  Family Affairs
  Dept. JII/3
  Stubenbastei 5
  A-1010 Vienna
  Austria
  tel: 43/1-515-22-3449
  fax: 43/1-513-1679-1008
  e-mail: Nora.Aiierifilbmu.gv.at

  Jacqueline Miller
  Brussels University
  Avenue Jeanne 44
  1050 Brussels
  Belgium
  tel: 32/2-650-3183
  fax: 32/2-650-3189
  e-mail: imillenfiiresulb.ulb.ac.be
                                           176

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)
                             September 1999
Harry Whittaker
SAIC Canada
3439 River Road
Ottawa, Ontario, K1A OH3
Canada
tel: 613/991-1841
fax: 613/991-1673
e-mail: harry.\\hittakeriqsetc.ee.gc.ca

Jan Svoma
Aquatest a.s.
Geologicka 4
152 00 Prague 5
Czech Republic
tel: 420/2-581-83-80
fax: 420/2-581-77-58
e-mail: aquatestfr7iaquatest.cz

Kim Dahlstram
Danish Environmental Protection Agency
Strandgade 29
DK-1401 Copenhagen K
Denmark
tel: +45/3266-0388
fax: 45/3296-1656
e-mail: kdafr7iinst.dk

Ari Seppanen
Ministry of Environment
P.O. Box 399
00121 Helsinki
Finland
tel: +358/9-199-197-15
fax: +358/9-199-196-30
e-mail: ari.seppanenfr7;vvh.fi

Rene Goubier
Polluted Sites Team
ADEME
B.P. 406
49004 Angers Cedex 01
France
tel: 33/241-204-120
fax: 33/241-872-350
e-mail: rene.goubierfr7iadame.fr

Andreas Bieber
Federal Ministry7 for the Environment
Ahrstrasse 20
53175 Bonn
Germany
tel: 49/228-305-305-3431
fax: 49/228-305-305-2396
e-mail: bieber.andreasfffibmu.de
Anthimos Xenidis
National Technical University Athens
52 Themidos Street
15124 Athens
Greece
tel: 30/1-772-2043
fax: 30/1-772-2168

Pal Varga
National Authority for the Environment
F6 u.44
H-1011 Budapest
Hungary
tel: 36/1-457-3530
fax: 36/1-201-4282
e-mail: varga.pfr7!ktmdom2.ktm.hu

Matthew  Crowe
Environmental Management and Planning
  Division
Environmental Protection Agency
P.O. Box 3000
Johnstown Castle Estate
County Wexford
Ireland
tel: +353  53 60600
fax: +353 53 60699
e-mail: m.crowefrTjepa.ie

Masaaki Hosomi
Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology
2-24-16 Nakamachi
Tokyo 184-8588
Japan
tel:+81-42-388-7070
fax: +81-42-381-4201
e-mail: hosomifrTjcc.tuat.ac. ip

Raymond Salter
Ministry for the Environment
84 Boullcott Street
P.O. Box 10362
Wellington
New Zealand
tel: 64/4-917-4000
fax: 64/4-917-7523
e-mail: rsfr7imfe.govt.nz
                                             177

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)
                             September 1999
BjoniBjornstad
Norwegian Pollution Control Authority
P.O. Box 8100 Dep
N-0032 Oslo
Norway
tel: 47/22-257-3664
fax: 47/22-267-6706
e-mail: bjorn.biomstad@sft.telemax.no

Ewa Marchwinska
Institute for Ecology of Industrial Areas
6 Kossutha Street
40-833 Katowice
Poland
tel: 48/32-1546-031
fax.: 48/32-1541-717
e-mail: ietuffiietu.katowice.pl

Marco Estrela
Institute de Soldadura e Qualidade
Centra de Tecnologias Ambientais
Estrada Nacional 249-Km 3-Leiao (Tagus Park)
Apartado 119-2781 Oeiras Codex
Portugal
tel:+351/1-422-8100
fax:+351/1-422-8129
e-mail: maestrela@isq.pt

loan Gherhes
EPA Baia Mare
I/A Iza Street
4800 Baia Mare
Romania
tel: 40/4-62-276-304
fax: 40/4-62-275-222
e-mail: epaf/;multmet.ro

Branko Druzina
Institute of Public Health
Trubarjeva 2-Post Box 260
6100 Ljubljana
Slovenia
tel: 386/61-313-276
fax: 386/61-323-955
e-mail: branko.dnizinaia;gov.si
Vitor A. P. M. Dos Santos
Spanish National Research Council
Professor Aubareoal
18008 Granada
Spain
tel: 34/958-121-011
fax: 34/958-129-600
e-mail: vasantosffieez.csis.es

Ingrid Hasselsten
Swedish Environmental Protection Agency
Blekholmsterrassen 36
S-106 48 Stockholm
Sweden
tel: 46/8-698-1179
fax: 46/8-698-1222
e-mail: inhffienviron.se

Bernard Hammer
BUWAL
3003 Bern
Switzerland
tel: 41/31-322-9307
fax: 41/31-382-1456
e-mail: beniard.hammerffibuwal.admin.ch

Kahraman Unlii
Depratment of Environmental Engineering
Middle East Technical University
Inonii Bulvari
06531 Ankara
Turkey
tel: 90-312-210-1000
fax:90-312-210-1260
e-mail: lainluffimetii.edu.tr

Ian D. Martin
Environment Agency
Olton Court
10 Warwick Road
Olton, West Midlands
United Kingdom
tel: 44/121-711-2324
fax: 44/121-711-5830
e-mail: ianmartinffienviroiiment-agencv.gov.uk
                                             178

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)
                             September 1999
                                     ATTENDEES LIST
M. Resat Apak
Istanbul University
Avcilar Campus, Avcilar 34850
Istanbul
Turkey
tel: 90/212-5911-998
fax:  90/212-5911-997
e-mail: rapakfffiistanbul.edu.tr

Nora Meixner (c.r.)
Federal Ministry of Environment, Youth and
 Family Affairs
Dept. HI/3
Stubenbastei 5
A-1010 Vienna
Austria
tel: 43/1-515-22-3449
fax:  43/1-513-1679-1008
e-mail: Nora.Auer gibmu.gv.at

James F. Barker
Waterloo Hydrogeology Advisors, Inc.
Waterloo Centre for Groundwater Research
University of Waterloo
Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1
Canada
tel: (519) 885-1211 (ext. 2103)
fax:  (519)725-8720
e-mail: barkerfflcgrnserc.uwaterloo.ca

Paul M. Beam
U.S. Department of Energy
19901 Germantown Road
Germantown, MD  20874-1290
United States
tel: 301-903-8133
fax: 301-903-3877
e-mail: paul.beamtgiem.doe.gov

Andreas Bieber (c.r.)
Federal Ministry for the Environment
Ahrstrasse 20
53175 Bonn
Germany
tel: 49/228-305-305-3431
fax:  49/228-305-305-2396
e-mail: bieber.andreas@bmu.de
Poul J. Bjerg
Technical University Denmark
Department  of  Environmental  Science   and
Engineering
Building 115,2
2800 Lyngby
Denmark
tel: 45/45 25 16 15
fax: 45/45 93 28 50
e-mail: plb'giimt.dtu.dk

Bjern Bjernstad (c.r.)
Norwegian Pollution Control Authority
P.O. Box 8100 Dep
N-0032  Oslo
Norway
tel: 47/22-257-3664
fax: 47/22-267-6706
e-mail: bjorn.bj onistadffitelemax .no

Harald  Burmeier
Fachhochschule North-East Lower Saxony
Department of Civil Engineering
Herbert Meyer Strasse 7
29556 Suderburg
Germany
tel: 49/5103-2000
fax: 49/5103-7863
e-mail: h.burmeierr<7it-online.de

Maurizio Buzzelli
Ambiente
Via R, Fabiani, 3
20097 San Danato Milano (MI)
Italy
Tel: +39/2-520-47879
Fax: +39/2-520-57130
e-mail:  maunzio.buzzelli'fflambiente.snam.eni.it

Piotr Cofalka
Institute for Ecology  of Industrial Areas
6 Kossutha Street
40833 Katowice
Poland
tel: 48/32-254-6031
fax: 48/32-254-1717
e-mail:  piterrfijietu.katowice.pl
                                             179

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)
                             September 1999
Kim Dahlstr0m (c.r.)
Danish EPA
Strandgade 29
DK-1401 Copenhagen K
Denmark
tel: + 45 32 66 03 88
fax:  +45 32 96 16 56
e-mail: kda@mst.dk

Birgit Daus
UFZ-Umweltforschungszentrum
 Leipzig-Halle GmbH
Permoserstrasse 15
D-4318 Leipzig
Germany
tel: +49/341-235-2058
fax:  +49/341-235-2126
e-mail: daus@pro.ufz.de

Branko Druzina (c.r.)
Institute of Public Health
Trubarjeva 2-Post Box 260
6100 Ljubljana
Slovenia
tel: 386/61-313-276
fax:  386/61-323-955
e-mail: branko.daizina@gov si

Vitor A.P.M. Dos Santos
Spanish National Research Council
Professor Aubareoal
18008 Granada
Spain
tel: 34/958-121-011
fax:  34/958-129-600
e-mail: vasantos@eez.csis.es

Erol Ercag
Istanbul University
Dept. of Chemistry
Avcilar Campus, Avcilar 34850
Istanbul
Turkey
tel: 90/212-5911-998
fax:  90/212-5911-997
e-mail: ismailb@istanbul.edu.tr
Volker Franzius
Umweltbundesamt
Bismarckplatz 1
D-14193 Berlin
Germany
tel:  49/30-8903-2496
fax: 49/30-8903-2285 or-2103
e-mail: volker.franzius@uba.de

loan Gherhes (c.r.)
EPA Baia Mare
I/A Iza Street
4800 Baia Mare
Romania
tel: 40/4-62-276-304
fax: 40/4-62-275-222
e-mail: epa@multinet.ro

Rene Goubier (c.r.)
Polluted Sites Team
ADEME
B.P. 406
49004 Angers Cedex 01
France
tel:  33/241-204-120
fax: 33/241-872-350
e-mail: rene.goubier@ademe.fr

Patrick Haas
U.S. Air Force
Center for Environmental Excellence
3207 North Road. Bldg. 532
Brooks AFB, TX 78235-5357
United States
tel:  210-536-4331
fax:  210-536-4330
e-mail: patrick.haas@HOAFCEE.brooks.af.mil

Ingrid Hasselsten (c.r.)
Swedish Environmental Protection Agency
Blekholmsterrassen 36
S-106 48 Stockholm
Sweden
tel: 46/8-698-1179
fax:  46/8-698-1222
e-mail: inh@environ.se
                                             180

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)
                             September 1999
Masaaki Hosomi (c.r.)
Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology
2-24-16 Nakamachi
Koganei
Tokyo 184-8588
Japan
tel: 81-42-388-7070
fax: 81-42-381-4201
e-mail: hosomifgicc.tuat.ac.jp

Stephen C. James (Co-Director)
U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency
26 Martin Luther King Drive
Cincinnati, OH 45268
United States
tel: 513-569-7877
fax:513-569-7680
e-mail: iames.steve:'g:epamail.epa.gov

Harald Kasamas
CARACAS - European Union
Breitenfurterstr. 97
A-1120 Vienna
Austria
tel: 43/1-80493 192
fax:  43/1-804 93 194
e-mail: 101355.15 20:fficompuserve .com

Walter W. Kovalick, Jr. (Co-Director)
U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency
401 M Street SW (5102G)
Washington, DC 20460
United States
tel: 703-603-9910
fax: 703-603-9135
e-mail: kovalick.vvalter@epamail.epa.gov

Fran Kremer
U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency
26 Martin Luther King Drive
Cincinnati, OH 45268
United States
tel: 513-569-7346
fax:513-569-7620
e-mail: kremer.franfffiepamail.epa.gov

Hana Kroova
Czech Ministry of the Environment
Vrsovicka 65
100 10 Prague 10
Czech Republic
tel: 420/2-6712-1111
fax:  420/2-6731-0305
Pia Heim Kugler
BUWAL
3003 Bern
Switzerland
tel: 41/31-323-7330
fax: 41/31-323-0370
e-mail: Pia.Kuglerfffibuwal.admin.ch

Ian D. Martin (c.r.)
Environment Agency
Olton Court
10 Warwick Road
Olton, West Midlands
United Kingdom
tel: 44/121-711-2324
fax: 44/121-711-5830
e-mail: ian.martini'ffienvironment-agencv.gov.uk

Jacqueline Miller (c.r.)
Brussels University
Avenue Jeanne 44
1050 Brussels
Belgium
tel: 32/2-650-3183
fax: 32/2-650-3189
e-mail: jmiller@resulb.ulb.ac.be

Walter Mondt
Ecorem n.v.
Zwartzustersvest 22
B-2800 Mechelen
Belgium
tel: 32-15-21  17 35
fax: 32-15-21 65 98
e-mail: Ecoremfffiglo.be

Robin Newmark
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
7000 East Avenue (L-208)
Livermore, CA 94550
USA
tel: 925-423-3644
fax: 925-422-3925
e-mail: newmark@llnl.gov

Carlos de Miguel Perales
ICADE
Alberto Aguilera, 23
28015 Madrid
Spain
tel: 34/1-586-0455
fax: 34/1-586-0402
                                             181

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)
                             September 1999
Mathias Schluep
BMG Engineering AG
Ifangstrasse 11
8952 Schlieren
Switzerland
tel: 41/1-730-6622
fax: 41/1-730-6622

Robert Siegrist
Colorado School of Mines
Environmental Science and Engineering
Division
1500 Illinois Avenue
Golden, CO  80401-1887
United States
tel: 303-273-3490
fax: 303-273-3413
e-mail: rsiegris! ffimines.edu

Anja Sinke
TNO Institute of Environmental Science
PO Box 342
7300 AHApeldoorn
The Netherlands
tel: 31-55-549-3116
fax 31-55-549-3252
e-mail: sinke@mep.tno.nl

Michael Smith
68 Bridge-water Road
Berkhamsted, Herts, HP4 1JB
United Kingdom
tel: 44/1442-871-500
fax: 44/1442-870-152
e-mail: michael.a smithffibtinternet.com

Sjef Staps
TNO-MEP
P.O. Box 342
7300 AH Apeldoorn
The Netherlands
tel: 31 555493474
fax: 31 55541 9837
e-mail: s.stapsiffimep.tno.nl

Kai Steffens
PROBIOTEC GmbH
Schillingsstra* e 333
D 52355 Duren-Giirzenich
Germany
tel: 49/2421-69090
fax: 49/2421-690961
e-mail: infoffiprobiotec.ac-euregio.de
Jan Svoma (c.r.)
Aquatest a.s.
Geologicka 4
152 00 Prague 5
Czech Republic
tel: 420/2-581-83-80
fax: 420/2-581-77-58
e-mail: aquatestiffiaquatest.cz

Bert-Axel Szelinski
Federal Ministry for the Environment
Schiffbaurerdamm Str. 15
10117 Berlin
Germany
tel: 49/30-28550-4270
fax: 49/30-28550-4375

Natalya Tadevosyan (c.r.)
Division of Hazardous Substances Registration and
  Control
Ministry of Nature Protection
35, Moskovian Strasse
375002 Yerevan
Armenia
tel: +37/42-538-838
fax: +37/42-533-372
e-mail: feminifffinature.am

Stefan De Tavernier
ATOS  Environnement
Aeroport Nantes-Atlantique
Rue Nungesser et Coli
44860 Saint Aignan de Grand Lieu
France
tel: 33/2-4013-1200
fax: +33/2-4005-2062
e-mail: atosredffisoftdom.com

Georg Teutsch
University of Tubingen
Sigwartstrasse 10
72076 Tubingen
Germany
tel: 49/707-1297-6468
fax: 49/707-150-59
                                             182

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)
                             September 1999
Steve Thornton
University of Sheffield
Mappin Street
Sheffield
United Kingdom
tel: 44/114-222-5700
fax:  44/114-222-5700
e-mail: S.F .Thomton'gisheffield .ac.uk

Nobuyuki Tsuzuki
Japan Environment Agency
1-2-2, Kasumigaseki, Chiyoda-Ku
Tokyo 100-8975
tel:+81/3-5521-8322
fax:+81/3-3593-1438
e-mail: nobuyuki_tsiizukiff:eanet.go.jp

Kahraman Unlii (c.r.)
Department of Environmental Engineering
Middle East Technical University
Inonu Bulvari
06531 Ankara
Turkey
tel: 90-312-210-1000
fax:  90-312-210-1260
e-mail: kunluffimetu.edu.tr

H. Johan van Veen (c.r.)
TNO/MEP
P.O. Box 342
7800 AN Apeldoom
The Netherlands
tel: 31/555-493922
fax: 31/555-493921
e-mail: anneke.v.d.lieuvelffispbo.beng.wau.11!

Pal Varga (c.r.)
National Aumority for the Environment
F6 u.44
H-1011 Budapest
Hungary
tel: 36/1-457-3530
fax:  36/1-201-4282
e-mail: varga.D@ktmdom2.ktm.hu
Joop Vegter
Tlie  Technical  Committee  on Soil  Protection
(TCB)
Postbus 30947
2500 GX The Hague
The Netherlands
tel: 31-70-339-30-34
Fax 31-70-3 3 9-13-42
e-mail: tcb'ffleuronet.nl

Catherine Vogel
SERDP
901 North Stuart Street - Suite 303
Arlington, VA 22203
United States
tel: 703-696-2118
fax:  703-696-2114
e-mail: vogela'giacq.osd.mil

Terry Walden
BP Oil Europe
Chertsey Road
Sunbury-on-Thames
Middlesex TW16 7LN
UK
tel: (44) 1932-764794
fax: (44) 1932-764860
e-mail: waldenjtfgibp.com

Holger Weiss
UF2 - Umweltforschungszentrum
Leipzig-Halle GmbH
Permoserstr. 15
04318 Leipzig
Germany
tel: 49/341-235-2060
fax:  49/341-235-2126

Harry Whittaker (c.r.)
SAIC Canada
3439 River Road
Ottawa, Ontario, KlA OH3
Canada
tel: 613/991-1842
fax:  613/991-1673
e-mail: ham .whittakerto;etc.ec.gc.ca
                                             183

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)              September 1999

Anthimos Xenidis
National Technical University Athens
52 Themidos Street
15124 Athens
Greece
tel: 30/1-772-2043
fax:  30/1-772-2168
e-mail: axen@,central.ntua.gr
                                              184

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)              September 1999
                                   PILOT STUDY MISSION

                     PHASE in - Continuation of NATO/CCMS Pilot Study:
            Evaluation of Demonstrated and Emerging Technologies for the Treatment
                            of Contaminated Land and Groundwater

1. BACKGROUND TO PROPOSED STUDY

The problems of contamination resulting from inappropriate handling of wastes, including accidental releases.
are faced to some extent by all countries. The need for cost-effective technologies to apply to these problems
has resulted in the application of new/innovative technologies and/or new applications of existing technologies.
In many countries, mere is increasingly a need to justify specific projects and explain their broad benefits given
the  priorities for limited environmental  budgets. Thus, the environmental merit and  associated cost-
effectiveness of the proposed solution will be important in the technology selection decision.

Building a knowledge base so that innovative and emerging technologies are identified is the impetus for the
NATO/CCMS Pilot Study on "Evaluation of Demonstrated and Emerging Technologies forme Treatment of
Contaminated Land and  Groundwater." Under  this current study, new technologies being developed,
demonstrated, and evaluated in the field are discussed. This allows each of the participating countries to have
access to an inventory of applications of individual technologies which allows each country to target scarce
internal resources at unmet needs for technology development. The technologies include biological, chemical,
physical, containment, solidification/stabilization, and thermal technologies for both soil and groundwater. This
current pilot study draws from an extremely broad representation and the follow up would work to expand this.

The current study has examined over fifty environmental projects. There were nine fellowships awarded to the
study. A team of pilot study country representatives and fellows is currently preparing an extensive report of
the pilot study activities. Numerous presentations and publications reported about the pilot study activities over
the five year period, hi addition to participation from NATO countries; NACC, other European, and Asian-
Pacific countries participated. This diverse group promoted an excellent atmosphere for technology exchange.
An extension of the pilot study will provide a platform for continued discussions in this environmentally
challenging arena.

2. PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES

The United States proposes a follow-up (Phase IH) study to the existing NATO/CCMS study titled "Evaluation
of Demonstrated and Emerging Technologies for the Treatment of Contaminated Land and Groundwater." The
focus of Phase III would be the technical approaches for addressing the treatment of contaminated land and
groundwater. This phase would draw on the information presented under the prior studies and the expertise
of the participants from all countries. The output would be summary documents addressing cleanup problems
and the array of currently available and newly emerging technical solutions. The Phase III study would be
technologically orientated and would continue to address technologies. Issues of sustainability, environmental
merit, and cost-effectiveness would be enthusiastically addressed. Principles of sustainability address the use
of our natural resources.  Site remediation addresses the management of  our land and water resources.
Sustainable development addresses the re-use of contaminated land instead of the utilization of new land. This
appeals to a wide range of interests because it combines economic development and environmental protection
into a single  system. The objectives of the study are to critically evaluate technologies, promote the appropriate
use of technologies, use information technology systems to disseminate the products, and to foster innovative
thinking in the area of contaminated land. International technology verification is another issue mat will enable
technology users to be assured of minimal technology performance. This is another important issue concerning
use of innovative technologies. This Phase III study would have the following  goals:

   a)   In-depth discussions about specific types of contaminated land problems (successes and failures) and
       the suggested technical solutions from each country's perspective,

                                               185

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Ground water (Phase III)              September 1999


    b)  Examination of selection criteria for treatment and cleanup technologies for individual projects,

    c)  Expand mechanisms and channels for technology information transfer, such as the NATO/CCMS
       Environmental Clearinghouse System,

    d)  Examination/identification of innovative technologies,

    e)  Examining the  sustainable use of remedial technologies—looking at the broad environmental
       significance of the project, thus the environmental merit and appropriateness of the individual project.

3. ESTIMATED DURATION

    November 1997 to November 2002 for meetings.
    Completion of final report: June 2003.

4. SCOPE OF WORK

First, the Phase III study would enable participating countries to continue to present and exchange technical
information on demonstrated technologies for the cleanup of contaminated land and groundwater. During the
Phase II study, these technical information exchanges benefitted both the countries themselves and technology
developers from various countries. This technology information  exchange  and  assistance to technology-
developers would therefore continue. Emphasis would be on making the pilot study information available. Use
of existing environmental data systems such as the NATO/CCMS Environmental Clearinghouse System will
be pursued. The study would also pursue the development of linkages to other international  initiatives on
contaminated land remediation.

As in the  Phase II study, projects would be presented for consideration and, if accepted by other countries, they
would be discussed at the meetings and later documented. Currently, various countries support development
of hazardous waste treatment/cleanup technologies by governmental assistance and private funds. This part
of the  study  would report on and  exchange information  of ongoing work in the development of new
technologies in this area. As with the current study, projects would be presented for consideration and if
accepted, fully discussed at the meetings. Individual countries can bring experts to report on projects that they
are  conducting. A final report would be prepared on each project or category of projects (such as thermal,
biological, containment,  etc.) and compiled as the final study report.

Third, the Phase  III study would identify specific contaminated land problems and examine these problems
in depth.  The pilot study members would put forth  specific problems, which would be addressed in depth by
the  pilot study  members at the meetings. Thus, a country  could present a specific problem such as
contamination at a electronics manufacturing facility,  agricultural production, organic chemical facility,
manufactured gas plant, etc. Solutions and technology selection criteria to address these problems would be
developed based on the collaboration of international experts. These discussions would be extremely beneficial
for  the newly industrializing  countries facing cleanup issues related to privatization as well as developing
countries. Discussions should  also focus on the implementation of incorrect solutions for specific projects. The
documentation of these failures and the technical understanding of why the project failed will be beneficial
for those  with similar problems. Sustainability, environmental merit, and cost-benefit aspects would equally
be addressed.

Finally, specific area themes for each meeting could be developed. These topics could be addressed in one-day
workshops as part of the CCMS meeting. These topic areas would be selected and developed by the pilot study
participants prior to the  meetings. These areas would be excellent venues for expert speakers  and  would
encourage excellent interchange of ideas.
                                               186

-------
NATO/CCMS Pilot Project on Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III)             September 1999

5. NON-NATO PARTICIPATION

It is proposed that non-NATO countries be invited to participate or be observers at this NATO/CCMS Pilot
Study. Proposed countries may be Brazil, Japan, and those from Central and Eastern Europe. It is proposed
the non-NATO countries (Austria. Australia, Sweden, Switzerland, New Zealand, Hungary, Slovenia, Russian
Federation, etc.) participating in Phase  II be extended for participation in Phase HI of the  pilot  study.
Continued involvement of Cooperation Partner countries will be pursued.

6. REQUEST FOR PILOT STUDY ESTABLISHMENT

It is requested of the Committee on the Challenges of Modem Society that they approve the establishment of
the Phase III Continuation of the Pilot Study on the Demonstration of Remedial Action Technologies for
Contaminated Land and Groundwater.

Pilot Country:           United States  of America
Lead Organization:       U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

U.S. Directors:
      Stephen C. James                       Walter W. Kovalick, Jr., Ph.D.
      U.S. Environmental Protection Agency     U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (5102G)
      Office of Research and Development       Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response
      26 W. M.L. King Drive                  401 M Street, S.W.
      Cincinnati, Ohio  45268                  Washington, DC  20460
      tel: 513-569-7877                       tel: 703-603-9910
      fax: 513-569-7680                      fax: 703-603-9135
      E-mail: james.steve@epamail.epa.gov      E-mail: kovalick.walter@epamail.epa.gov

Co-Partner Countries:    Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France,
                       Germany,  Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Japan,  New  Zealand, Norway, Poland,
                       Portugal, Slovenia, Sweden, Switzerland, The Netherlands,  Turkey, United
                       Kingdom, United States

Scheduled Meetings:     February 23-27, 1998, in Vienna. Austria
                       1999 to be determined
                       2000 in France or Germany
                       2001 in Canada or the United States
                                             187

-------