X  i j ?r —i
=  -n ° =•
Z pa o «

o' T3 ^ ?
'— PS 13" S

^ a " c?
        x
                            O
        o

   S-o -
   ^§cf


   55' ^ CD"



   pT 2? a"

   2^ ~
   f> e o5
   P £T c
   «• S- s


   If?

   "^ ri
     o &
                                    OJ
                                    o
   S3^
   § S^
   11

   8.1
>— oo
>— O
   t-o
oo I
                                       en
                                         CD
        o* >™j
        CD  ^y

        3  °


        It
        CD  CD
        a. n.
           o

an
ate
              ?r
              en

              >
              en
              en
              O
              O


              8'
              o


              o
                                                               0
                                                               V

                                                               O
3  t?
2  d

3  3'
fVj  b_d


CT" sP
C  > VJ »-,

|- - § 1

S  PT Sg ^
en  O ^ o

"SIS'

o" 5 K ?
w  CD _*. &•

S  P O 3
en  <->• t^ O
  Ci O O
   22 c 12.

  5 en en

   ^ O
   N) O ">
   4^ K a
   i  £31 5"
   VO O 
en
O
nr
CD
3
o'
£L
M
1
c3
CD
O
*<



p:
y5
yi
:n'
£
3
O
CS
3
1
aL
^3
Ji5
3
P
H.
G3
&
CD*
£
£•
CD
!-r
S-
CD
a_
CD
PS
a.
P
^
<
B
CD
<<
O
>-h
CD
O
S
o
gs_


™
*-<
§
a-
S
CD
en
O
S-
CD
&
I
CD
r^-
O
o
'S'
CD"
en
                                                     fl>
                                                     i-f-

                                                     o"


                                                     •o
                                                                                                CD
                                                                                                O
                                                                                                fi)
                                                                                                o
AEPA
Publication #550-F98-010

U.S Environmental Protection Agency

Chemical Emergency Preparedness and Prevention Office (CEPPO)

Mail Stop 5104

401 M Street, SW

Washington, DC 20460
                                                (Address label here)

                                                                  3    S    5
                                                  3

-------
    Does This Apply to Me?
                                  What's It All About?
                                                         Compliance Tips
Under a new EPA chemical accident
prevention rule, some operators of water
treatment systems will have to implement a
risk management program and Tile a risk
management plan (RMP) with EPA by June
21, 1999. If you handle, store, or use any of
the following above the threshold quantities,
you are likely to be subject to this rule:
Chemical
Threshold Quantity
Chlorine                    2,500 pounds
Anhydrous ammonia        10,000 pounds
Aqueous ammonia          20,000 pounds
(concentration 20% or greater)
Chlorine dioxide            1,000 pounds

If you have other chemicals at your facility,
you can get a complete list of substances
regulated under this rule and their thresholds
from EPA,      ;      ;   ;            ;  -•
The risk management program rule (also
known as Clean Air Act section 112(r), the
RMP rule, or part 68) is designed to prevent
serious chemical accidents that could affect
public health and the environment and to
improve the response to any accidents that do
occur.

The rule requires covered facilities to develop
and to implement an integrated system to
identify hazards and manage risks. If you are
subject to this rule, you must analyze worst-
case releases, document a five-year history of
serious accidents, coordinate with local
emergency responders, and file a risk
management plan with EPA. If your worst-
case release could affect the public, you also
must analyze more realistic alternative
scenarios and develop and implement a
prevention program that includes, among
other steps, identification of hazards, written
operating procedures, training, maintenance,
and accident investigation.  If your employees
respond to accidental releases, you must
implement an emergency response program.
The RMP you submit to EPA will summarize
your program and will have to be made
available to the public.
 The good news is that many water treatment
•system operators already are complying with
 many of the prevention requirements because
 these steps are part of the way you operate
 safely. If you are subject to the OS HA
 Process Safety Management Standard under
 Federal or state law, you are likely to be in
 compliance with almost all of the prevention
 program requirements and may need to take
 no other steps to satisfy this part of EPA's
 rule. If you already have an emergency
 response plan, you  are likely to be in
 compliance with that part of EPA's rule as
 wejl.

 Besides helping you prevent accidents, the
 rule can improve the efficiency of your
 operation by ensuring that your workers are
 trained in proper procedures and by using
 preventive maintenance to reduce equipment
 breakdowns.

 The American Water Works Association
 (AWWA) is developing a guidance document
 specifically for operators of water treatment
 systems that will help you understand the
 requirements as they relate to your
 operations. The water treatment system
 guidance will make compliance less
 burdensome by providing industry-specific
 information and analyses,     ;       s^

-------