Monday
January 3, 1983
Part III
Environmental
Protection
Hazardous Waste
Standards Applicable
Hazardous; Waste; Proposed
to
053
Agency
Management Systems
Generators of
Rule
-------
118
Federal Register / Vol. 48. No. 1 / Monday. January 3. 1983 / Proposed Rules
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 262
[SW FR11970-2]
Hazardous Waste Management
System; Standards Applicable To
Generators of Hazardous Waste
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency,
ACTION: Proposed rule.
SUMMARY: On February 26, May 19, and
November 19, I960, and January 11,
1982, the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) published regulations
pursuant to the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act [RCRA). Those
regulations allow hazardous Waste
generators to accumulate hazardous
wasle generators to accumulate
hazardous waste on-site for 90 days
without obtaining a permit or having
interim status under RCRA, provided
that they accumulate the Waste in
accordance with certain standards.
EPA has, received comments from the
regulated community indicating that
industries which generate hazardous
waste typically have numerous
locations on-site where waste is initially
generated and accumulated, often in
small amounts, prior to consolidation at
centralized accumulation areas. In
response to concerns that the standards
for 90-day accumulation are
unnecessary and impractical to apply at
these "satellite" areas, EPA is proposing
to amend the generator standards to
allow generators to accumulate as much
as 55 gallons of hazardous waste
(except for acutely hazardous waste as
listed in 40 CFR 261.33(e) of the
regulations) at each satellite area for
any length of time without complying
with the 90-day accumulation standards.
Generators could accumulate wastes
under this provision provided that: (1)
The wastes are placed in containers
which are in good condition, (2) the
wastes are compatible with their
containers, and (3) the containers are
marked with the words "Hazardous
Waste" or other words that identify
their contents. Within 72 hours of
accumulating over 55 gallons at a
satellite area, the generator would be
required to comply with all applicable
requirements under RCRA for further
management of any waste in excess of
55 gallons. • "
EPA believes that protection of human
health and the environment will not be
affected by this action. EPA also
estimates that this action will result in a
savings to the regulated community of
approximately $5.000,000 per year.
DATES: EPA will accept public
comments on the proposed amendment
until March 4,1983.
ADDRESSES: Comments should be
addressed to the Docket Clerk, Office of
Solid Waste (WH-562), U.S. .
Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M
St. SW, Washington, D.C. 20460.
Communications should identify the
regulatory docket'number "Section
262.34(c)."
The public docket for this proposed
rule is located in Room S-269C, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M
Street SW, Washington, D.C., and is
available for viewing from 9:00 am to
4:00 pm Monday through Friday
excluding holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Amy Mills, Office of Solid Waste (WH-
563), U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, D.C. 20460, (202)
382-4755, or the RCRA Hotline at (800)
424-9346 o^(202) 382-3000.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On February 26,1980, May 19,1980,
and November 19, ,1980, EPA
promulgated regulations pursuant to the
Solid Waste Disposal Act, as amended
by the Resource Cpnsevation and .
Recovery Act (RCRA), as amended, 42
U.S.C. 6901, et seq. The regulations
established a system to manage
hazardous waste; and include standards
for generators of hazardous waste. (40
CFR Part 262,, 45 FR 12732, 45 FR 33142, "
and 47 FR 1251). In § 262.34(a) of the ,
regulations, EPA stated that generators
may accumulate hazardous waste on-
site for up to 90 days without obtaining
a storage permit, provided they
accumulate the waste in accordance "
with certain standards. These standards
include requirements for: the use of
. tanks and containers, personnel
training, and the preparation of
contingency plans. In establishing those
standards, EPA had assumed that •
accumulation generally occurred at one
or two discrete locations within an
industrial facility, and that the §. 262.34
requirements would apply to. loading
docks, storage buildings, sheds and
other central areas where wastes are .
accumulated.
Members fo the regulated community,
however, have pointed out that within
an industrial complex there may be
dozens of paces where hazardous
wastes are initially generated and
collected during daily operations prior
to consolidation at a loading dock or
other central waste accumulation area. ,
At present, the regulations make no
distinction between the initial collection
of hazardous waste at various points of
generation ("satellite" accumulation)
and accumulation at a central area on-
site where these wastes are
consolidated for on-site managment or
transportation off-site. Therefore, the
standards for 90-day accumulation
apply to both. .
In the preamble to the November 19,
1980, Federal Register notice amending
§ 262.34, the Agency raised the issue of
whether a distinction should be .drawn
between satellite accumulation and
central accumulation areas. 45 FR 7@624.
EPA expressed the view,that the
requirements of § 262.34(a) appear
appropriate for all types of accumu)a-tion
areas, but solicited comments on the
subject. .
Various groups responded and all
asserted that there is indeed a practical
distinction between satellite and central
accumulation which should be
recognized in the regulations. The
commenters supported a reduction or
deletion of regulatory requirements for
initial accumulation of hazardous
wastes at or near points of generation.
Some commenters expressed the
opinion that regulation of hazardous
waste in satellite areas is unnecessary
because these waste quantities are
small and pose a very low risk to human %
" health and the environment. Some noted
that hazardous waste in satellite areas
is typically held in a bucket or other
container for only several days or a
week before being emptied; therefore,.
they contended that there is little risk of
undetected corrosion or leakage.
Commenters. also pointed out that unlike
central accumulation areas where the
variety and quantity of wastes
contribute to the likelihood of serious
incidents and chain reactions (fires,
explosions, etc.), satellite areas usually
Have only one type of waste and are not
prone to accidents of serious magnitude.
Most of the industries that commented
reported that their satellite areas are
'close to manufacturing process areas
and are under close company
supervision. They stated that personnel
who work in these areas are trained and
' experienced with hazardous raw
materials and wastes. One example
given was that of degreasing solvents
accumulated in closed containers in a
machine shop prior to being transferred
to a central accumulation point. The
satellite area is properly ventilated and .
equipped with a sprinkler system,
mainly because of the risks posed by the
raw material solvents and their use. The
personnel who work in this area are
said to be trained and experienced with
the handling of these solvents before
and after use. The commenters '
concluded that the additional'training
-------
Federal Register/ Vol. 48, No. 1 / Monday, January Z, 1983 / Proposed Rules
119
required under § 262.34(a), which
requires compliance with | 265.16, is"
unnecessary and Burdensome. .
.- In addition-, by applying the training •
requirements to personnel who work'at
satellite areas,, somie plant .officials have
to train very large numbers of
,. employees and keep, extensive records
on each person. One cbmmenter noted!
that at one manufacturing; plant, the
. personnel training requirements apply to
ten times as many employees as they
would if the requirements applied* only
, to central accumulation areas. In his1
opinion, this large difference 'in cost and;
paperwork is riot justified, ,
Some-commenters-claimed.that the: !"
requirement that the date uporr which
each period;of accumulation begins be
marked off each container is too
stringent for wastes accumulated at -
satellite areas. They stated that it is
unnecessarily burdensome -to mark. •
dates on buckets aiid= other small- '
containers in whiefr these- wastes 'are ••
likely to be'collected; Further, since :
these vessels are emptied frequently,,
they mustbe marked repeafedly with1 "
new-accumulation dates. This aspect" of ,
the requirementwas-alspHhought ta»be
•.burdensome.: ' . :..
©necommeiiter wrote that, • "
- requirements; in § ,262.34(a}' which
requires compliance witteBart'265
Subpart D,(Contingeircy Plans and-
Emergency Erp'cedures^are too stringent
for:satelliteaEeas;.,Ifa. his»opiniorrr ifcis
notnecessary'tttprepate'Co^tin'gency
plans and designatesmergency. .* , ,
coordinators;for these-small,,scattered
. accumulatioir areas. ^
.-Several commertters remarked that
Congress iritendedi that RCRA-not
interfere in manufacturing, processes. -
They stated that initial accumulatiba of
hazardous waste at or, near: the points of
generation are*integral parts, of. the
.mamifaEturing pr,o:ces&, and' should
"therefore not-,be-subject tovregulatioff
under. RCRA, TJiey,also noted that most.
of the accumulation, areas are indoor
workplaces/and'are subject, to regulation
Undeu OSHA1. Regulation of satellite ,
areas under RCRA* appears to them to
be duplicative and unwarranted. ,
.In general, the commentera believed '
that applying-therrequirements of
§ 262.34{a) to activities-at satellite
accumulation: areas addmnnecessary
paperwork and cost.without.improving
protection of human health or the . -
environment. They advocated an
exemption for satellite areas-from: some,
or all of the requirements of §• 262.34{a).
While the Agency does not agree with
all of the arguments raised by the*
commente'rs, EPA does agree with the-
general conclusion'that there is little
need for'extensive regulation of satellite
areas under RCRA. The Agency agrees
that it should,not apply most of the
requirements "of § 262;34(a), which were
intended for more centralized, higher
volume accumulation, to the smaller
volumes of waste at satellite areas.
Specifically, the Agency believes that
wastes collected at or near points of
generation> in small, quantities need not
be subject to, requirements for marking
of dates on containeris^ contingency
1 plans, personnel training? and.most
standards, for the management of «,
containers and" tanks-required by Part
265 Subparts land J. •
As previously stated, some
commenters, claimed.that OSHA
standards protect the safety arid health
of persons handling hazardous .materials
in,the-workplace,.andtherefore RCRA
regulations are redundaht.,EPA has
considered O'SHA's standards, and has
concluded, that EPA, should retain, some.
regulation for accumulation, pf,
hazardous; waste in, the workplace. Eirst,
current OSHAjegulationa concern the
handling of v-arious hazardous materials
in the workplace, but OSHA does not
specifically regulate hazardous waste as
defined under RCRA. Also, OSHA's
rules docnotdeal specifically with -
aspests. of, accumulation* that affect
human health.aird the environment ,.
immediately, outside the workplace. FOE
instance;,OSHA does^rfotregulate the
condition of containers usedifor ;
accumulation. EPA therefore believes: it
is^within^heAgenGy's punview to '-'
contiriue'torregulate the ac.ciimulatibn:.o£.
hazardousrwaste within industrial areas
insofar as. thosfe regulations-dc^not
duplicate or, interfere with ongoing:
practices. ',". . ., •-.•..
In a proposed'mile published';in the
March 19; 1982,,Eederal Register (47 FR ....
12119J, OSHA proposed new safely .
regulatLons for manufacturmg entities ,--
which produce hazardous chemicals!
The rule, which would apply to-most
kinds of hazardous wasfes-aecumulated;
by generators, would requiredabeling,
material safety datasheets (MSDS) and"
teaming for employees of manufacturing;
industries who work around hazardous
chemicals. When and if.OSHA's '
praposaiis promulgated in, final form,
EPA will ensure that ariy final
rulemaking on.the subject of hazardous
waste accumuiation.is consistent with
and willnot duplicate OSHA's
requirements. . .'•..- • , ,
II. Today's Proposed Rule
For the reasons expressed above, EPA
is today proposing-to amend | 262.34 by
adding a paragraph (c) ta provide that
small quantity accumulation of
hazardous.waste at satellite areas be '--'
exempt from the requirements of -
§ 262:34(a); Section 262.34fc) would ;
allowJ'for accumulation oEas.much as 55:
gallons of hazardjous waste (other than
"acutely" hazardous wastes listed in
§ 262.33(e) of'the regjilations) at or, near
anjf point cif generation:for any amount
of time if the generator, complies with :
§ § 265.171^and 265.172 and marks, the
containers'with the words "Hazardous
Waste" or with another description- of
their conteiits (e.g;,!;"waste orgariics" or
"waste solvent"). Within 72;hours of
accurnurating over 55 gallons at any
satellite area,.the generator,would be
required ta manage thattwaste in exeess.-
of 55 gallons on conformance with;all.'
applicable-iStandardSiunderRCRA, -
including the 90-day; time limit and other,
requirementsf under § 262.34(a); fo'r, ,
furtherorr-Siite raceumtilatlon.,During the
72-hQur interimj.peripdi/H^eff.m',and
265.17'2 .andithe container marking
-•requiEeiherit would cantinue?to apply.,
After, considering" s-evetaL alternatives;.
EprA,hffisJselected;55?gallons";as:a ,
quantity, threshold foisthis,prov.isi'on.
The regulatBd;cornin'unity'has;indieated'
thata;55-gall'on;thresholdIwould ,
aGcommodsite thevariety of satellite
sit^atioristthey, eitoounter; At the same
. time, EBA.believesithis threshold will
pravide a reasonable limibtoithe amount
of-hazaf dous. wastemanaged; without: •
thebenefit:of: the more erivironmentally
,proteGti*e:nieasures of '§: 262:34(a}. Fifty-
five gallons of wdste fillsfapprroximafely-'
one standard size" drum, whichj tctEPA's
• kirowredge.'is the^largest commonly
used container for sueh accumulation.
' : EPA had-considered setting a limit'of
one-container at each'satellite Ibcatipri
. instead of sotting a wiatste volume limit.
That option was rejected because
diffefene industries use different sizes'''of
container's forsatellite accumulation,
and'the Agency believes it would be
unreasonable to limit all gene.rators'tb
q'ne contrainter per area, regardless'of ;
container size. Further, the Agency • ,:
Believes that;,prptectibn;of health-and
the environment is'mbre closely
associated; with the quantity of '•"•;•'
accumulattoM at each location, than!with*
the number of contain.ers,used to
accumulate: l;he waste':'
EPA hadalso consideEed-setting,a "
limit at each'satellite area, of 200
kilograms5(Kgj;or ten,days»6f
accumulation, whichever occurs first.
Although 200 kg arid 55 gallons of waste
are approximatly equivalent, the Agency
selected.the volume limit (gallons);
because it believes' that-a' volume limit"
would provide for greater equity under
the regulations for generators with
wastes of higher unit weight. With
regard;to the, 10-day threshold, the
Agency believes.there is little to be
-------
120
Federal Register / Vol. 48, No. 1 / Monday, January 3. 1983 / .Proposed .Rules.
gained by applying a time limit to the
accumulation of small quantities of
wastes in satellite areas if they are
containerized and marked properly. For
these reasons, EPA has decided not to
propose either a weight limit or a time
limit for satellite accumulation.
However, the Agency requests
comments on this determination and^n
whether a threshold other than 55 ''
gallons should be used in this provision.
The 55-gallon threshold applies to
each satellite area where hazardous
wastes are accumulated. One
manufacturing plant, therefore, may
have several satellite areas on-site
where as much as 55 gallons may be
accumulated in conformance with
§ 262.34(c).
When over 55 gallons of hazardous
waste has been accumulated at any
poinl of generation, the generator would
have 72 hours in which to comply with
other hazardous waste management
standards, such as § 262.34(a), for that
amount of waste in excess of 65 gallons.
The 72-hour period is intended to
provide generators with adequate lead
time to remove the excess wastes from
the satellite area and to comply with the
appropriate standards for subsequent
management of the wastes. However,
the same hazardous waste management
standards that would apply during 55-
gallon accumulation would continue to
apply during the 72-hour period.
The proposed rule would require that
waste in satellite areas be managed in
accordance with §§ 265.171 and 265.172
of the interim status standards for •
storage. These standards are general,
good-housekeeping measures which
ensure that containers used for storage
of hazardous wastes are in good
condition, and are compatible with their
contents. EPA believes that these are
sensible requirements which should
provide protection to human health and
the environment.
EPA believes it is appropriate that the
contents of containers used for satellite,
accumulation be identified clearly for
safe handling and storage. The
standards in § 262.34(a) require the
containers used for 90-day accumulation
be marked with the words "hazardous
waste". EPA believes that the same
standard should apply to satellite
accumulation, but recognizes that in
many satellite areas these containers
are already routinely labelled with more
explicit information about the materials
they contain. Either a marking of
"hazardous waste" or another marking
identifj'ing the contents of the container
would probably serve the purpose of
informing persons*in the area of the
hazardous nature of the material. EPA is
therefore proposing to allow either type
of marking 'during.the satellite
accumulation period.
The proposed rule does not provide
for the satellite accumulation of acutely
hazardous wastes, (wastes comprised of
those commercial chemical products and
chemical intermediates listed in
§ 261.33(e), their off-specification-
species, containers and inner liners
containing these materials, and spill
residue; and debris created by spills of
these materials). The Agency identified !
those'wastes as beiqg particularly
hazardous, and believes that all
generators should use extra precautions
wherever they handle acutely hazardous
wastes, including at satellite
accumulation areas. For this reason,
today's proposal to exempt satellite
accumulation of hazardous waste from
many regulatory requirements does not
include acutely hazardous waste.
Acutely hazardous waste would
therefore continue to be subject to
§ 262.34(a) at-both central and satellite
accumulation areas. The Agency
welcomes comments on this
determination. ' ' ...
III. Laboratory Wastes
Today's proposed exemption for
satellite accumulation of hazardous
wastes could be applied to laboratories
where waste chemicals are initially
generated and collected in small
containers. Laboratory chemicals which
have served their intended purpose, ,
including discarded samples and spent
solvents, are often collected initially in
small containers such as 5-gallon cans
or jars. When a number of these
containers are aggregated, they are
commonly placed in "lab packs" (as
discussed in the preamble to § 265.316,
November 17,1981) and sent off-site for
disposal. Some laboratories cannot
qualify for the small quantity generator
exemption in 40 CFR § 261.5; therefore,
under current regulations-, these •„.
laboratories must comply with
§ 262.34(a) from the moment they" begin
accumulating hazardous waste. If
today'.s proposed rule is promulgated in
final form, the initial accumulation of as
much as 55 gallons of hazardous waste
at or near'any point of generation in' a
laboratory will be governed by
§ 262.34(c) rather than §_262-.34(a).
Some laboratories that handle
hazardous waste have indicated to EPA
that the RCRA regulations regarding „
accumulation have been impractical to.
implement in laboratories. Their main
concern has been the problem of
accumulating quantities of hazardous
waste that can be practically
N transported ofjF-site. Because
laboratories commonly collect waste .
chemicals at slow rates, if often takes
longer than 90 days in which to / .
accumulate enough waste to fill a .
shipment. EPA believes that today's
proposed rule, together with the current
provisions for accumulation-by small
quantity generators (§ 261.5), will
alleviate most of the operational
problems associated with accumulation
of hazardous waste by laboratories.
However, the Agency welcomes ;
comments and suggestions,on this
matter. / . .
IV. Maintenance of Vessels at
Manufacturing Areas
Hazardous wastes are sometimes
generated when product vessels in
manufacturing plants are periodically
cleaned out. This maintenance "
procedure may produce a number of
drums of hazardous waste which,
according to the current regulations,
must be managed in accordance, with
§ 262.34(a) as soon as accumulation
- begins'rSome generators find this..
requirement unreasonable, explaining
that these drums are commonly removed
from the clean-put area within two or
three days, and therefore the immediate .-.
need to comply with the regulatory
requirements for 90-day accumulation •
poses an unreasonable burden. Under
the amendment being proposed today, a
generator woukLhaye 72 hours after the
first 55 gallons are accumulated in
which to comply with either § 262.34(a)
for continued on-site accumulation, or v
other'hazardous waste management
standards, as appropriate. EPA believes
that .today's proposal would alleviate
the problems that generators experience
with complying with § 262.34(a) during
maintenance of product vessels.
V. Effective Date
Section 3010(b) of RCRA-provides^that
EPA's hazardous waste regulations and
revisions thereto take effect six months
after their promulgation. In addition, 5
U.S.C. 553 of the Administrative
Procedure Act requires that substantive
- rules not become effegtive until at least
30 days.after promulgation unless there
is good cause for shortening the period.
The purpose of these requirements is to
allow persons affected by the
rulemaking sufficient lead time to
prepare to comply with major new
regulatory requirements. However, for
the amendment proposed today, the
Agency believes that delaying the
effective date for any period of time
after promulgation would cause
substantial and unecessary disruption in
the implementation of the regulations .
and would be contrary to the public ,...
interest. This amehdment, if ' ,
promulgated in final form, would relieve
-------
Federal Register / Vol. 48. No. I-./ Mpnday. January 3, 1983 / Proposed Rule's
121
hazardous waste generators of having to
comply with a number of requirements
with respect to the initial, small quantity
accumulation of hazardous waste in
. containers within a generating area. The
Agency believes" that thisis hot the type
of regulation revision that Congress had
in mind when'it provided a delay.
between the promulgation and the
effective date of revisions to regulations.
Consequently,: the Agency plans to make
this amendment effecive immediately "i'f *
_an when it is promulgated in final form.
VI. Compliance With Executive Order
12291
Under Executive Order 12291, EPA
must judge whether a regulation is
"major'1 and therefore sub"ject to the ' •
requirement of a regulatory Impact
Analy$is. This proposedj-egulation is
not. major because it will not result in.an.-:
effect on'the economy of $100 million or
more, nor will it result in an increase in
. costs or prices to industry. There would •.
be no adverse impact on the'ability of
U.S.-based enterprises to compete with
„ foreign-based enterprises in domestic or '
export markets.. Because this s "
amendment is no't a major regulation, no
Regulatory Impact Analysis is being ,
conducted. . .
, This regulation was submitted-to the
Office of Management and Budget for
review as required by .Executive Order
12291.
VII. paperwork Reduction Act
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act,
44 U.S.C. 3501 etseq:, Federal agencies
must consider the paperwork burden
imposed by any information collection
request contained in a proposed or final
rule. This proposed rule, if promulgated,
will not impose any new information
collection requirements on'the regulated
community. In fact, this rule would -
reduce the information collection
requirements contained in the cleared '
OMB request #2000-0062.
VIII. Regulatory Flexibility Act
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5
U.S.C. 601 et seq., EPA mustprepare a
'regulatory flexibility analysis for all
proposed rules to assess their impact on
small entities. No regulatory analysis is
requred however, where the head of the
agency certifies that the rule will not.
have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The economic impact of this ''"•,:
regulation will be to reduce the costs of
complying with EPA's hazardous waste
management regulations for generators .
of hazardous waste, .including those
which are small entities. Accordingly, I
hereby certify, pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
601(b),that this proposed rule will not
have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number-of.small entities.
List of Subjects in 40 GFR Part 262
Hazardous materials, packaging and
containers, Reporting and recordkeeping
requiremejits, Security measures, Surety
_ bonds, Waste treatment and disposal
.water supply." :.-'"'•
'. Dated: December 20, 1982;
Anne M. Gorsuch, •
Administrator. - - • ,
It isproposed that Title 40 of the Code
pf Federal Regulations Part 262 be
aiiiended as follows:
rPART 262—STANDARDS APPLICABLE
"TO GENERATORS OF HAZARDOUS
WASTE
1. The authority citation for Part 262
reads as follows: .-' .
'•-' 'Authority: Sees. 1006, 2002..3002, 3003, 3004, '
and 3005 of the Solid Waste, Disposal Act, as
^amended by the Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act of 1976, as amended, (RCRA),
42 L/.S.C. 6905, 6912, 6922, 6923, 6924, 6925.
2. In § 262;34; paragraph fc) is added
to read as. follows: ;
§262.34 Accumulation time.
* * * * • ' • * - '
(c)(i) Excepfas provided by ' •
paragraph (c)(2J of this section, a
generator may accumulate.as much as
55 gallons of hazardous waste in
. containers at or near any point of
generation without a permit or interim"
status and without complying with
-paragraph (a) of this section provided .
he—. -'•;••• . ' . • ' ;-'*.:
[i] Complies with §§ 265.171 and
265.172 of this, chapter; and.
(ii) Marks his containers either 'with..
the words "Hazardous Waste" or with
other words that identify the contents of
the containers.
(2) Paragraph (cXl) of this section ':
-does not apply to the accumulation of
•acute hazardous wastes as identified in
§ 261.3'3(e]I of this chapter. , ":'-'
(3) A generator who accumulates •
hazardous wraste in accordance with
paragraph (c)(l) of this section and •-"'•''"'
exceeds 55 gallons at or near any po'int
of generation must, with respect to that •
amount of waste'in excess of 55 gallons, .
comply within 72'hours with paragraph'
(a) .of this section or other applicable
provisions of this chapter. During the 72-
hour^eriod, the generator must continue-
to comply, with paragraphs (qjfrlfj) and
(c)(l)(ii).bf this section. .-...'"~-. .-:
[FR Doc. B2-35150 Filed 12-30-82; 8:46. amj .. •
BILLING CODE 6560-50-M
-------
-------
-------
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use
$300
Washington DC 20460
------- |