Friday
September 29, 1989
Part  IV
Environmental Protection Agency

40 CFR Parts 260 and 261
Hazardous Waste Management System;
Testing and Monitoring Activities;  Final
Ru!a

-------
40260    Federal-Register ,/ Vol. 54, No. 188, / Friday, September 29, 1989 / Rules and Regulations
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY

40 CFR Parts 260 and 261

[FRL-3549-5]

RIN 2C50-AC80
     *                  *
Hazardous Waste Management
System; Testing and Monitoring
Activities
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPAJ,    .         •         ,
ACTION; Final rule.	'     	

SUMMARY: This role adopts 47 testing,-
methods as approved methods for use in -
meeting the regulatory requirements
under subtitle C of the Resource
1 Conservation and Recovery Act
(RCRA). These new methods are found
in the Third Edition pf 'Test Methods
for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/
Chemical Methods", Office of Solid
Waste Publication SW-848, and in
Updata I of that Third Edition.'As
specified in revised Tables 2 and 3,
these methods may be used to meet
regulatory requirements in conjunction  .
with, or in addition to the methods
.found in the Second Edition of SW-848
as amended by Updates I and n.
EFFECTIVE DATE: Effective on October
30,1989.
s ADDRESSES: The official record for this
rulemaking (Docket No. 848-84-1) is
located in Room M-2427, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, 401M
Street SW., Washington. DC 20460, and
is available for viewing from 9:00 a.m. to
4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidaya Call (202} 475-
9327 for appointments. The public may
 copy a maximum of 100 pages of
materiel from, any one regulatory docket
 at no cost; additional copies cost $0.15
 per page.
   Copies of the Third Edition of SW-848
 and of Update I to the Third Edition are
 available from the Government Printing
 Office, Superintendent of Documents,
 Washington, DC 20402, (202) 783-3238.
 The document number is 955^001-00000-
 1 and the cost is $110.00 for the four-
 volume set plus updates. Update
 packages will be automatically mailed
 to all subscribers.
   Copies of the Second Edition of SW-
 846 are available from the National
 Technical Information Service (NTIS),
 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA
 22181, (703) 487-4600. The document
 number is PB87-120-291 and-the cost is
 $48.95 for paper copies and $13.50 for
 microfiche.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
 For general information contact the
 RCRA Hatline at (800) 424-9348 (toll
 free) or. (202}'382r-3000. For technical
 information contact Charles Sellers,
 Office of Solid Waste, OS-331, U.S.
 Environmental Protection Agency, 401M •*
 Street SW., Washington. .DC 20480, (202)-
 382-3282.
 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

 Preamble Outline  .-,  •'  .    . .
 L Authority
 IL Background                  '   •.
  A. Regulatory Framework
 • B. Nature of the SW-848 Manual
  C.,Mandatory Use of the Manual
  D. Origin of Today's Final Rule
. HL Issues Discussed in and Arising from the
    October 1984 Proposed Rule
• A. Overview of Proposed Rule
  B. Other New Methods in SW-84ffthat are
 -  not Part of Today's Rule
  C. 47 Methods Adopted in Today's Rule"
 - D. Comments Regarding the 47 Methods
    Adopted in this Final Rule
  E, Information Related to Tables 2 and 3;
    Appendix HI. Part 261
 IV. State Authority                - •
  A. Applicability of Rules in Authorized
    States   .          '
  B. Effect on State Authorizations
 V. Regulatory Analyses     '     .''•••   .
 ' A. Regulatory Impact Analysis
  B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
 VI. List of Subjects in 40 CFR Parts 260 and
    261                           -

 L Authority,  " •    ;  'x     .
   These regulations are being
 promulgated under the authority of
 sections 3001, 3004, 3005, and 3006 of the
 Solid Waste Disposal Act, as amended
 (commonly known as the Resource
 Conservation and Recovery Act. or
 RCRA1, 42 U.S.C. 6921, 6924, 6925, and
 6926.,  .

 n. Background

 A. Regulatory Framework
   Subtitle C of the Resource
 Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976
 (RCRA) creates a comprehensive
 - national program for the safe
 management of hazardous waste.
 Among the elements of this program,
 section 3001 requires the Agency to
 develop and promulgate characteristics
 for identifying hazardous waste, and for
 specifically listing hazardous wastes.
 Furthermore, sections 3004 and 3005
 require the Agency to promulgate the
 standards necessary to protect human
 •health and the environment for the
 treatment, storage and disposal of
 hazarous -waste, and to implement those
 standards through a permit program.
   The Agency has promulgated a
 detailed set of criteria, standards,
 definitions, and other requirements to
 meet its charge under sections 3001,
 3004, and 3005. Associated with
 characterizing wastes, determining their
 proper management, and monitoring the
 performance of waste management
 units, is a panoply of testing methods
 that address the sampling and analytical
 procedures to be used. These methods
 ensure accuracy, precision, and
 comparability of test results.
   EPA Publication SW-846, "Test
•Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,
 PhysicaVChemical Methods" contains
 those sampling and analysis methods
 that EPA has, in principle, approved. In
 situations where the regulations require
 the use of appropriate SW-846 methods,
 the regulations specify the Second
 Edition of EPA's SW-848 manual (1982)
 as amended by Updates I (April 1984)
 and n (April 1985). As described in more
 detail below, since 1985 EPA has issued
 many new SW-846 methods as
 guidance, and has issued a Third Edition
 of SW-846. These later methods have
 not yet been approved. In January, 1989,
 •EPA proposed to amend the regulations
 to approve the use of all of the new
 methods, in addition to the older ones.
 •  Some of the new methods (including
 the 47 covered by this rule) were
 proposed for approval in 1984. To
 expedite the use of these particular 47
 methods, this final Tulemaking provides
 that these methods are approved for use
 where the regulations require
• compliance with appropriate SW-846
 methods. The existing Second Edition
 methods continue to be approved.-EPA
 also intends to proceed with the January
 1989 proposal (excluding the 47 methods
 approved today), so that all new
 methods contained in the Third Edition
 of SW-846 (and Update I) will be
 approved.
 B. Nature of the SW-846 Manual

    Approved and standardized testing
 and quality control (QC) procedures are
 needed to assist both the regulated
 community in complying with RCRA
 testing requirements and EPA officials
 in enforcing them. Thus, the Agency
 publishes and maintains a guidance
 manual, "Test Methods for Evaluating
 Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical
 Methods", OSW publication SW-846.
 This manual provides a unified, up-to-
 date source of information on sampling,
 analytical, and QC procedures related to
 compliance with the RCRA regulations.
 It brings together in one reference
 document all of these procedures that
 have been approved by the Agency for
 use in the RCRA regulatory program and.
 in determining compliance with the
 RCRA requirements. However, except
 where regulations specifically require
 the use of certain SW-846 test methods
 or QC procedures, use of the methods
 contained in SW-846 are not mandatory.

-------
            Federal Register f Tfoil 5$. No. 188 f RacEay.  September 29. 1989 / Rnfes antf Regulations    402fit
   OSW first publishBd;SW-fi46 in May
 1980^ when the Agency promulgated
 Phase11 of tfae hazardous waste
 regulations (45 FR 33085-33588}^
 Advances in. analytical Htsftunientatior*
 and techniques are continually EC viewed
 by OSW and. periodically incorporated
 into SW-848- to maintain .consistency
 with changes nr the- regulatory program
 and to-improve methed performance .
 te.y., aecBfacy, precision, raggedness-,
 and sensitivity] and completeness.
 Therefore, HI 1982 the Agency issued' the
 Second Edition of SW-848, and in    .
 March of IS87, theThfrd ETdftfoa of SW-
 846 became available The Agency baป
 since proposed that the Th&d Eifiifon> of
 SW-846, together with Update K replace*
 the Second Editipn as the eompendJraa
 of approved testing' and QC procedures
 (54 FR 3212-322?, January 23k 1985). The
 Third Edition, of SW-846 Broadens" the
 scope of the manual with, new methods^  .
 more guidance, and up-dated QC   '
 proced'urea    -s
   EPA emphasizes that this guidance-
 manual ia a "Hiving"- dacnmeHt and will
 change; over time: ax new information  •
 and dailaarEdBxelapedLEPAsoIJicifcs!
 any available data and information, that
 may affect the usefulness of this manual.
 Furthermore, regarding those regulations-
 that mandate the use  of appropriate
 SW-848 methods for specific areas- of
 RCRA ccuuplidiiuu, the Agency-wilt, of
 course, separately propose ta change
 those specific regulations-ta incorporate:
 the revisions to SW-845. An- appropriate1
 .comment period will be made available
 for those, methods made mandatory ia
 the eventuality of that rulemaking. This
 does not mean that the updating; of the-
 guidance- document needs to have a-
 prior proposal, or that it need await the
 completion of the rulemaking. Such a
 proposed rulemaking  would affect only
 the use of SW-846 as  a mandatory
 requirement for certain elements of the
 RCRA program (see next sectionj.

 C. Mandatory Use of the Manuaf
   Several of the hazardous- waste-
 regulations under subtitle C of RCRA
 require that specific testing methods
 described in the Second Edition of SW/-
 848 be employed for certain
 applications. rFtjr convenience oftfte
   1 Note also that Appendix I of parfZSf,
 "Representative Sampling Methods", supplements'
 SW-846 by referencing four sampling methods for
 extremely viscous liquids, fly ash-like materials,
 containerized liquid wastes, and liquid wastes iir.
 pits, ponds and lagoons. While Appendix !:i*not>
 formally adopted; or required! by EPA, the-Agency
 camiiiMSiase.of tnesamplingimethods specified! to
 Appendix I as acceptable for determining a
' "representative sample" (see J 26T^O(c)% Finally*
 i 260.11 mcocporates: by reference twee tee* methods*
. formeasuring the hazardous waste characteristic of
 Ignitability under part 281: ASTM StandanKTeatt
reader, t&eAgencyris= listing feefow t&e-
sections of 4ป CFR Farts 260-270- t&ef
require' the use- of appropriate1 SW-84&
methods^ As noted' earlier,, any reliable
anlytical methods, mcluding- any- version
of SW-S-fBi may be used! to meet other
requirements- in parts 260-2701. Use of
the Second Edition is currently'
mandatory for the regulations listed
below:                              ;
  (1) Section 260.22rd](lHiJ—Submission
of data in'snppoTt of petitions to exclude
a waste produced at a- particular facility
(Ke., denstmg petitions-];
  (21 Section 261.22faJ—Evaluation- of
waste against the cornwmry
characteristic
  (3} Section- 2dl.24(a>—Evaluation- of
waste against the Extraction Procedure
toxicity characteristic;
  (4f Section-284.S14(cy and
5 26&.314{d>—Evaluation of waste to
determine' if free Hqoid is- a component
of the waste; and'         '     .
  (5J Sectiaii 270.62fb}f2){iK'G>—
Analysis of waste prior to- conducting- a
trial burn m> support of an appBeatfon
for ป hazardoHS' waste Mciheratibn
permit.

D. Origin of Today's Final Rule
  On Octoberl, 1984 ฃ43 FR.33786-
33812.),. EPA.proposed.several chanopg ta
the subtitle C hazardous waste
regulations. These proposed changes
kieludedi the following elements^ .
  fl J Addition- of &T new methods- to-
SW-848;'
  (ZJ Mandatory adherence to the
procedures, and methods in SW-846 for
att RCRA. testing?
  {3J EUnrinatiGH of requi3?ementS' to test
for certanr.compxiunds when conducting
ground water monitoring;
  (4) Use of screening: tests when.
mom'toring ground water for hazardous
constituentsr and
  (5] Use of the Hierarchical Analysis
Protocol for ground water screening.
  Many comments were received, on. the
proposak The Agency evaluated these
comments- and,, ss s result, decided not
to promulgate the October 1,1984
proposaL Instead* the Agency revised.
&W-84&;. aป a guidance manual, to-
incorporate many of the suggestions-
made fii the comments and undertook
other actions, to address changes to the
ground water monitoring regulations. On- -
March Iff, 1987; EPA announced the
availability of the Third Edition of SW-
846. in. the Federal Register (52 FR 8072],
  The Agency has since proposed in. a
separate rnleraaldng that the Third
Edition- of SW-848; together with Update
Nfetftods fdrFlash Point'ofliuqaids-by'Seta-Flaeh
CEosedlTesfer and'ASTJ*Stendaซl-Te8<- Methoda-
fer Hash Point by Pensky-Martซnป Closed Tcป(ซf.
 I, be-substituted at 126O.lt as- the
 approved, incorporated reference for
 parts- 280^270 hr lieu of the Second
 Edition: of SW-848; the. currently
 incorporated' reference in f 260:11 (54 FR
 3212-3229?. The effect of tins proposal,
 would be: (t) To require use of the Third
 Edition as amended by Update I, for all'
 testing; for which the SW-848 methods
 are specifically .mandated' in. current
 subtitle C regulations (seelistinlLC.);
 and (2) to update all'informational
 references to SW^-848 wherever they
 occur in 4d CFR parts 280r-27CL
 Furthermore^ the proposed rule would
 require persons performing RCRA-
 related testing^ whether or not they are
 using SW-848,. to follow Quality Control
 procedures detailed in. Chapter One of
 the Third Edition,. Update I of SW-848.
  This final rule constitutes a separate
 approval and adoption of 47"methods
 now contained in the Third Edition of
 SW-848 as amended by Update I. These
 47 methods were among 61 methods
 originally/ proposed in the October. 1,.
 1984,, Federal Register notice.. In light of
 the comments, received on- these 47
 methodsv some of the methods have
 been revised. The Third Edition and
 Update I of the Third Edition of SW-346
 already contain the revised versions of
 the 47 methods proposed hi October
 1984.
  Through today's final rule, use- of
 these; 47 newlp-approved methods'
 becomes an acceptable means of
 compliance where the regulations
 specifically mandate, use of appropriate
 SW-846 methods (see list in II.C.) and
 wftere the appropriate procedure
 includes one or more of these 47
 methods^ Hence, persons required'by
 regulation to use SW-846 methods will
 be responsible for adhering, as
 appropriate; to either SW-846, Second
 Edition as amended by Updates I and II,
 or to these 47 newly-approved methods
 that now appear in the Third Edition
 and its-Update-E All other portions of
 the Third Edition and its Update I are
 not approved or mandatory for anyone
 at this time., but may be ui the- future
 (see-Proposed Rule; 54> FR 3212-3229].

 IIL Issues Discussed ur and Arising
 From the October 1984 Proposed; Rule

A. Overview of Proposed'Rule

  The October 1,'1984-Notice of
 Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM], proposed
 five inaj'pr revisions to the. RCRA
hazardous waste, regulations; each
related to testing and monitoring
 activities (see II.D. above], A key reason
Beh&id the October 1984 proposal was
 mat ground water monitoring required
analysis- for "alP" or "each" constituent

-------
40262    Federal Register / Vol. 54, No. 188 / Friday. September 29. 1989 / Rules and Regulations
listed on Appendix Vffl of part 261 as
required under 40 CFR Part 264.
  The Appendix Vm list has presented ,
a number of problems when used for
purposes of ground water monitoring.
These include practical analytical •
problems such as listings which are
large categories of chemicals, the
dissociation or actual decomposition of
many Appendix VDI constituents when
placed in water, and the lack of
analytical standards or analytical :
screening methods for many
constituents.
  EPA acknowledged in 1982 that it lack
analytical methods for nine of the
Appendix Vffl constituents {see 47 FR
32290, July 28,1982). Also, in!984, EPA
proposed to eliminate 23 Appendix Vffl
constituents from th'e ground water
analysis requirements (see 49 FR 38786,
October 1,1984).        '    ,
  EPA amended its  regulations of July 9,
1987, to establish a new list of
constituents-for ground water   •
monitoring (52 FR 25942-25953).  -
Appendix IX of part 284 replaces
Appendix Vffl of part 281 as the ground
water monitoring list Appendix IX to  -
part 264 is made up of those compounds
                                  on Appendix Vffl for which it is feasible
                                  to analyze in ground water samples,
                                  plus 17 chemicals routinely monitored in
                                  the Superfund program. This change has
                                  altered the basis for much of the
                                 . October 1984 proposal. For this reason,
                                  only the addition of 47 SW-848 methods
                                  is finalized in this rule.
                                  Bi Other New-Methods in SW-848 that ~
                                  Are Not Part of Today'? Rule
                                    The Third Edition contains 72        ,
                                  methods'that are new to SW-846. Of
                                  these, 47 are covered by this rulemaking.
                                  As, noted earlier, these 47 methods were
                                 •among 61 methods first proposed in the
                                  1984 NPRM. Four of these methods
                                  appear in Update I to the Third Edition
                                  of SW-848, not in the Third Edition
                                  itself.
                                    The Agency's January 1989 proposal
                                  to change the incorporation by reference
                                  in ง 280.11 from the Second Edition of
                                  SW-848 to the Third Edition and its
                                  Update I  (54 FR 3212-3229), covers not
                                  only these 72 new methods in the .
                                  current Third Edition, but also 14  .
                                ". methods that are new to SW-848 as of
                                 -Update I to the Third Edition. If that
                                  proposal is finalized unchanged, all
                       methods contained in the Third Edition
                       and Update I of SW-846 (including.the
                       47 methods adopted today) would be
                       applicable where regulations
                       specifically mandate use of appropriate
                       SW-848 methods.
                       C, Methods Adopted in Today's Rule
                         The 47 methods being addressed in
                       this rule are listed in. Table 1. One  other
                       method proposed in 1984 and contained
                       in the Third Edition and Update I is
                       •Method 9090, Compatibility Test for
                       Wastes and Membrane Liners (as
                       revised). Method 9090 is not included in
                       today's final rule. Rather, the Agency
                       has sought further comment on the
                       revised version (54 FR 3212-3229).  The
                       remaining thirteen of the 61 methods
                       proposed in 1984 are not included
                       because problems were encountered
                       during reevaluation following the
                       comment period. Data generated by the
                       public and by EPA has demonstrated
                       that the methods could not be used in
                       their published form for the purpose
                       stated These methods are-listed in
                       Table-2. The Agency does not plan to
                       finalize these methods now, or in the
                       near future.
                                   TABLE 1—SW-846 METHODS ADOPTED IN THIS FINAL RULE
 Method
                                  TOe
                                                                                           Comments
    0010
    0020
    0030
    1320

    1330

    3611
    5040

    6010
    7090
    7091
    7198
    7210
   •7211
    7380
   •7381
    7480
   •7481
    7550
    7770
    7840
    7841
    7910
    7311
    7950
   •7951
    9022'
    9035
    9038
    9038
    9060
    9065
    soea
     9067
     9070
     9071
     9080
Modified Method S Sampling Train	
Score* Assessment Sampling System..
Votatiie Organic Sampling Train	
Multiple Extraction Procedure	_
Extraction Procedure tor Oily Wastes-
Alumina Column Cleanup and Separation cf Petroleum Wastes—.—
Protocol (or Analysis of Sorbent Cartridges from Volatile Organic
  Sirnpitog Train (VOST).
Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emmission Spectroscopy	
BerytBum (AA, Direct Aspiration)	:	:.	
Beryllium (AA, Fumaca Technique)				......
Chromium, Hexavalont (Differentia) Pulse Polarography)		
Copper (AA, Direct Aspiration)..	..		-	-
Copper (AA. Furnace Technique)—...ป
Iron (AA, Direct Aspiration) ......
Iron {AA, Fumaca Technique)..
Manganese (AA, Direct Aspiration).,	
Manganese (AA, Furnace Technique),
Otmium (AA, Direct Aspiration)	
SocSum (AA, Direct Aspiration)	
ThaRlum (AA, Direct Aspiration)	
ThaSum (AA, Furnace Technique)™,
Vanadum (AA, Direct Aspiration)—
Vanadium (AA, Furnace Technique).
Zinc (AA, Direct Aspiration)	
Zinc (AA, Furnace Technique)	
Total Organic HalWes (TOX) by Neutron Activation Analysis..
Suttate	.	
Sulfste™-,	
Solfate.—	
Total Organic Carbon	.	
PhenoHcs.
 Phenotics.
          Pnenodcs.
 Total Recoverable OB and Greaso .....„...-.;	.......
 08 and Grease Extraction Method for Sludge Samples.
 Cation-Exchange Capacity of Soils	.—
Stack sampling method for semi-volatile compounds.
Stack sampling method for semi-volatile compounds.
Stack sampling method for volatile organic compounds.
Extraction procedure used for delisting wastes that are stabilized, encapsulated, or
  chemically fixed.                       -
Extraction procedures used for delisting wastes containing oil or grease that may
  Interfere with the EP test
Provides a cleanup technique for oily matrices. Proposed as Method 3570.
Provides quantitative analysis method following VOST collection. Proposed  as
  Method 3720.
General method for multiple, element determination.
Flame AA method.                                          ,
Graphite furnace AA method. Provides low detection  limit and analytical flexibility.
Differential pulse polarography method.
Flame AA method.
Provides lower detection limit and analytical flexibility.
Flame AA method.
Graphite furnace AA method. Provides lower detection limit and analytical flexibility.
Flame AA method.
Graphite furnace AA method. Provides lower detection limit and analytical flexibility.
Flame AA method.
Flame AA method.
Rama AA method.
Graphite furnace AA method. Provides analytical flexibility.
Flame AA method.
Graphite furnace AA method. Provides lower detection limit and analytical flexibility.
Flame AA method.
Provides lower detection limit and analytical flexibility.
Neutron activation adds alternate analytical technique.
Automated chloranilate colorimetric method.
Automated methylthymol blue, autoanalyzer II colorimetric method.
Turbidimetn'c method.
Infrared determination of carbon djoxide.
Manual 4-AAP with distillation spectrophotometric method.
Automated  4-AAP with distillation colorimetric method. When  used, this method
 • must be preceded by the manual distillation specified in procedure 7.1 of Method
  9065.
MBTH**'wHh distillation spectrophotometric method.
Total oil and grease for liquids. Gravimetric, separately funnel extraction.
Total oil and grease for solids.
Soil liner evaluation using ammonium acetate.

-------
              Federal  Register / Vol.  54,  No. 188 /  Friday. September 29, 1989 / Rules  and Regulations     40263
                                TABLE 1—SW-846 METHODS ADOPTED IN THIS FINAL RULE—Continued
    Method
                                   Trtla
                                                                                            Comments
      9081
      9100

      9131
      9132
      9200
      9250
      9251
      9252
      9310
      9315
      9320
 Cation-Exchange Capacity o* Soils.	„*	
 Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity, Saturated Leachata Conductivity,
  and Intrinisc Permeability.
 CoKform.	..	.	.__.	
 Colifnrm	.,„,„	„„,..........		
 Nitrate	•„..,.<„...:	;	^,
 Chlnriria    ,	a	;	
 Chtoride-_	
 Chloride..
 Gross Alpha and Beta™
 Alpha-Emitting Radium Isotopes.
Soil liner'evaluation using sodium acetate.
General methods for hydraulic conductivity and liner permeability.

Multiple tube fermentation technique.       .    .       •
Membrane filter technique..                ,
Brucine colorimetric method.
Automated ferricyanide autoanalyzer I colorimetric method.
Automated ferricyanide autoanalyzer II colorimetric method.
Mercuric nitrate titrimetric method.
General radioactivity method.  ,
Total radium method.    ;           •••-...
Radium228method.    - .       ' •        •••   -
      * Thfe method to available in the first update to SW-846, Third Edition.
      " 3-Methyl-2-beiizothia20linoiie hydrazone hydrochloride.
                                  TABLE 2—PROPOSED METHODS NOT INCLUDED IN THIS FINAL RULE
    Method
                                   Title.
                                                                                            Comments
   1120
   3560
   7551
   8320

   8330

   8410
   8411
   8600
   8610
   8620
   8630
   9011
   9037
            Electrochemical Corrosion.
            Reverse Phase Cartridge Extraction-..
 Osmium (AA, Furnace Technique)™-.
Jti8ceUaiMMU8.Cornpound3.by HBLO.

 Thfoureas	:.....	
 Formaldehyde, Basic and Addjc Medium	;	
     ;                   ._-         /
 Hierarchical Analysis Protocol	:	',	„_„
 Total Aromatfcs.by Ultraviolet Spectroscopy	
 Total NHrogeivPhospnorous Gas Chromatographabte Compounds ^
 Derivatization Procedure for Appendh VIII Compounds.	
 Photodegradabte Cyanides	:_	
 Sulfate, Grauimnfriff,,, ,	•,.,,,.,.1....
This method was proposed as an alternate to Method 1110 in ah equivalency
  petition. After evaluation by NBC, Method 1120 was found to be not comparable
  in precision or accuracy.
Lack  of  sufficient data on column pro-treatment and conditioning, elution se-
  quences, BJution volumes, and the effect of the loading of organic compounds on
  the column to permit method to be adequately defined.
EPA study indicates accuracy problems.
No supporting data orv effectiveness of cleanup procedures and HPLC to determine
  the analytes. Questionable precision and accuracy.
No supporting data on effectiveness of cleanup procedures and HPLC to determine
  the analytes. Questionable precision and accuracy.
Too susceptible to interferences for application to ground water and solid waste
  matrices;
Method TKrt sensitive enough for its Intended purpose.
Method not sensitive enough for its intended purpose.
Method not sensitive enough for its intended purpose.
Method not sensitive enough for its intended purpose.
Uncertain how test and results relate to the environment
Precision and sensitivity not adequate. Interference-prone and therefore not appro-
  priate for environmental assay.
   D. Comments Regarding the 47Methods
   Adopted in This Final Rule
   1. General Comments
     EPA received comments addressing 25
   of the 47 methods adopted in this final
   rule. Eleven commenters made 98
   specific comments or queries. Five of
   these methods received 65 percent of the
   total comment; these methods are 1330,
   1320,9100,9131, and 0030, which are
   discussed individually below. For other
   comments and the Agency's response
   thereto, see "Public Comment
   Summaries and Responses for 40 CFR
   parts 260 and 261, Forty-Seven New
  - Analytical Methods Approved for
   subtitle C RCRA Hazardous Waste
   Testing, Proposed Rule—October 1,
   1984," in this docket
s   • Many of the comments or questions
   regarding these 47 methods were framed
   against the proposed requirement of
   mandatory use of SW-848 methods for
-~ all testing and monitoring activities
   required under subtitle  C. That will not
   be the case under this rulemaking;
   except where regulations specifically
   require the use of certain SW-848 test
                                  methods or QC procedures (see H.C.),
                                  the SW-846 manual is a guidance
                                 . document and is not mandatory.
                                    In this context, several commenters
                                  asked for clarification on the regulatory
                                  status of Methods 1320 (Multiple
                                  Extraction Procedure) and 1330
                                  (Extraction Procedure for Oily Wastes)
                                  in relation to Method 1310: Extraction
                                  Procedure (EP) Toxicity Test Method
                                  and Structural Integrity Test. Through
                                  today's rale, all three are approved
                                  methods. However, Method 1310  is
                                  required to be used to determine
                                  whether a waste exhibits the
                                  characteristic of EP Toxicity under 40
                                  CFR 261.24 and Appendix II of 40 CFR
                                  part 261, (i.e., whether a waste is
                                  hazardous under subtitle C of RCRA).   ,
                                  On the other hand. Methods 1320 and
                                  1330 are not mandatory. They were
                                  created for specific applications to
                                  wastes that are already defined as
                                  hazardous as part of the permitting and
                                  delisting process, and are not used in
                                  defining whether a solid waste exhibits
                                  the toxicity characteristic.   _
                                  Consequently, they are employed on a
                                  case:by-case basis when requested by a
                       permit writer. (Note that if these
                       methods are used to support a petition
                       to delist a listed waste at a particular
                       facility under 40 CFR 260.22(d)(l)(i), use
                       could become mandatory.)
                         Several commenters questioned the
                       rationale for providing more than one
                       method for certain analytes or
                       parameters. These commenters argued
                       that the different methods may produce
                       data that vary in precision and
                       accuracy; in addition, they indicated
                       that some methods are considered
                       outmoded by current technology. The
                       Agency agrees that different methods
                       will measure  the presence and/or
                       concentration of a given analyte or
                       parameter with varying capabilities of
                       precision and accuracy, and that some
                       methods are seldom used due to new
                       technology. However, the Agency
                       believes that  each method approved
                       provides data acceptable within the
                       scope of the method as defined in
                       section 1.0, "Scope and Application" of
                       each method. The philosophy of the
                       Agency is that the manual should
                       remain a compendium of approved

-------
40284    Federal Rmdster / Vd.  54> No.- 18S / Friday,  September 29, 1989 / Rtrfes and: Regulations
methods available for use at the "
discretion of the various programs and
permit writers operating under RCRA.
When a- specific method-is not required
and when multiple methods are
available for the analysis of the same '•,
analyte or parameter, then the permittee
or the regulated facility or laboratory
performing the analysis may choose
among the appropriatemethcd*.    '  •
  The vast ma jorityofthe comments- - -
submitted requested specific
clarification on method procedures  or
offered recommendations for improving
these methods^Thซsป comments- did not
suggest that the currently applicable
methods were not protective of human
health or the environment, nor did-they
provide any reason to.believe that the  _
currently applicable methods were
InfewiWe aa- a- technical matter. Some of
these detailed recommendations for.
technical improvementin SW-846 haver •
been adopted, some have been rejected, _
and'oiherswfl! undergo furmerEPA    '
consideration. Arthfs, tima, noweveivfne
Agency Is not prepared to adopt all the-.--
tecfaracalsuggestfonsv eras though acme-
or all of them may ultimately;prove to-be
meritorious. Ths Agency believes, the
best use pf.il* reaoucea and- the-needs of
the regulated community are such that
these technical improvements- can await
a future update effort The: Agency's .  .
response is detailed in tne Puฃfic
Comment Summaries, and Response in
this-docket
2. Method 133ฃt T?vfrnoHnn Procedure, for.
Oily Wastes
   Method 1330 received 22 specific
comments, from seven commenter*,
many of wMcE asked for clarification: OIL
 technical procedures. The Public
Comment Summarfea and. Responses-
document in the docket contains the
Agency's discussion of the technically-
oriented comments. One commenter
 contends that Method 1330 provides for
 a worst case scenario- with regard to the
leaching ofheavy metals which were-
 either contained"fri the oil orwere
 formerly shielded from me leaching-
 media by the oiL The commenter
 contends that oil biodegrades very
 slowly and. thatthese metals would
 becomcr available ta the environment at
 such a- alow rate that they will neverbe-
 detected in. otherwise naturally-
 occurring leachatea.
   While we agree that Method 1330 is
 intended to be a worst case scenario, it
 is not an. unreasonable scenario. Method'
 1330 was designed to measure the
 leaching potential of metals' from an oily
 waste in, a reasonably quick and
 efficient manner based on the,
 assumption, that the oil phase-is mobile
 and will migrate- away from the solid..
Sock mobility has been seen in a
number of situations. However* enough  -"
data from a variety of oil samplings to
determine method accuracy has not
been, coHectedrhence pass/fail criteria .
have not beeirestaBHshed. Tmw; mernare
and'interpretation of this method are
currently left to evaluation by
appropriate-regulatory, officials- on-a- -
caserDy-casB.basfs.       ,   '   ,

3*.8fetfiad-132d:Mtdtiple Extraction
Procedure •                 *  .
  Method 1320 received'12 specific
.comments from four commentera, many
of which also asked for clarification-cm
technical procedures. See Public
Comment Summaries and Responses.
One commenter recommended against
the inclusion of Method 132O in Table 1
of. Appendix.ni of 40 CFR part 261
before regulations have been
promulgated-that designate the
impKcated'wastes as hazardous, or •
govern tEeiz. treatment, storage, and
disposal,The' commenter states- that it is-
more-appTofprfate"to- evalnatB'dHtafrom"
tEe extractibn.metnod'on the
appropriate waste* as the regulated
characteristicsT of these wastes develop,.
rather than to make this method
mandatory nowv.
  The Agency agrees witfr the-
commenter:tfiatMetfiod 1320"not be
included in Table 1 of Appendix m. nor
that it be made mandatory at this time.
Hence; the-twe and interpretation of this
method are  currently left to evaluation
by appropriate regulatory officials on a
case-by-case basis..         -  -

4. Method 9100: Saturated: Hydraulic
Conductivity, Saturated Leachate
 Conductivity, and Intrinsic Permeability

   Method 9100 received eleven
 comments from two commenters. Most
 of the comments- on this- method-were
 concerned with the  technical
 requirements of individual procedures.
 For example, tfie method recommends-
 well casing diameters of 1% to'1%
 inches for slug tests nrmaterials of low
 hydraulic conductivity. The commenter
 recommends a minimum, inner diameter
 of Z incbes'to allow enough resolution
 for slug tests in low permeability soils.
 and'also to facilitate bailing and
 sampling,
   The Agency believes that while this-
                may have merit.
 Z Method 9131: Total Conform: Multiple
 Tube Fermentation Technique
   Method 9131 received ten specific
 comments from a single commenter. The
 proposed method suffered from several
 typographical errors; These errors have
 been, corrected in the current update of
 SW-a46: Themethod specifies that
 quality control (QC) data be provided on
 20 percent of all samples analyzed. The
• commenter contends, that & 1O percent
 QC check is- sufficient Because the
 Confirmed Test rarely faila the
 Completed Test
   The Agencybelievea that this
 recommendation may have merit;
 however, the Agency believes that
 additional information must be collected
 before the Agency changes the QC
 procedures. Therefore, fee Agency iป
 specifying that 20 percent, of the samples
 Be analyzed'as part of QC for this
 particular method.
 6. Method 0030: Volatile Organic
 Sampling Train ,
   Method'OOSO received nine specific.'
 comments from two commenters. One
      itenter recommends1 that
 additional information, must be collected
 before the Agency can, recommend, a
 change Therefore, the Agency is
 specifying a well casing diameter."of 1V*
 to iVa inches for slug tests in materials
 of low hydraulic conductivity.
 breakthrough, criteria be established for
 Principal Organic Hazardous
 Constituents (POHCs) for the purpose of
 determining the validity of a test run.
 Specifically,, the commenter.
 recommends that a 2 to 1 front-to-back
 ratio of POHC collected be established.
   The Agency believes that this
 recommendation has merit, and is
 developing the methodology and criteria
 to permit implementation of a QC
 procedure of thia kind at some point in
 the future. The Agency believes,
 however, that the method performance
 check and"performance audit specified
 in the current procedure are sufficient to
 identify significant problems in the
 methodology. The Agency is, therefore,
 finalizing thiH method in its current form.
 E. Information Related'to Tables 2 and
 3, Appendix HI, Part 261
   Along with, thia final rule, the Agency
 is republishirtg Tables Z and 3 of
 Appendixin, part 261. Table 2 identifies
 the approved-measurement methods^
 available for inorganic species and other
 miscellaneous.groups of analytes
 contained hi SW-^846. Table 3
 summarizes the contents, of SW-846 and
 supplies-the specific section and method
" number for sampling and analysis
 methods. Republication of these two
 tables in theii entirety is intended to
 give guidance on. where appropriate EPA
 approved methods are found: in either
 the Second or Third Editions.
   In that respect, note that pacts oฃ these
 tables are unchanged from the current

-------
           Federal Register / Vol. 54, No. 188 / Friday, September 29, 1989 / Rules and Regulations    40265
 tables appearing in the Code of Federal
 Regulations. Those unchanged portions
 of the tables are included in today's
 revision strictly for the convenience of
 the reader. These portions were not and
 are not involved in this rulemaking.
 Other portions of Tables 2 and 3 are
 being updated to reflect the approval of
 the 47 methods which are the subject of
 this rulemaking, and to provide easy
 reference to the source documents.
 IV. State Authority         .

• A. Applicability of Rules in Authorized
.State*         -....
 '  Under section 3006 of RCRA, EPA
 may authorize qualified States to
 administer and enforce the RCRA
 program within the State. (See 40 CFR
 part 271 for the standards and
 requirements for authorization.)
 following authorization, EPA retains
 enforcement authority under sections
 3008,7003 and 3013 of RCRA, although
 authorized States have primary
 enforcement responsibility.
   Prior to the Hazardous and Solid
 Waste Amendments of 1984 (HSWA), a
 State with final authorization        "
 administered its hazardous waste
. 'program entirely in lieu of EPA
 administering the Federal program in
 that State. The Federal requirements no
 longer applied in the authorized State,
 and EPA could not issue permits for any
 facilities in the State where the State
 was authorized to permit When new,
 more stringent Federal requirements
 were promulgated or enacted, the State
 was obliged to enact equivalent
 authority within specified time frames.  .
 New Federal requirements did not take
 effect in an authorized State until the
 State adopted the requirements as State
 law.
   In contrast, under section 3006(g) of
 RCRA, 42 U;S.C. 6926(g), new
 requirements and prohibitions imposed
 by the HSWA take effect in authorized
 States at the same time that they take
 effect in nonauthorized States. EPA is.
 directed to carry out those requirements
 and prohibitions in authorized States,
 including the issuance of permits, until
 the State is granted authorization to do
 so. While States must still adopt
 HSWA-related provisions as State law
 to retain final authorization, the HSWA
 applies in authorized States in the
 interim.

 B. Effect on State Authorizations
   Today's rule is imposed pursuant to
 pre-HSWA authority. Therefore, it is not
 immediately effective in authorized
 States. The requirements will be
 applicable only in those States that do
 not have interim or final authorization.
 In authorized States, the requirements
 will not be applicable until the State
 revises its program to adopt equivalent
 requirements under State law.
   40 CFR 271.21(e)(2) requires that
 States that have final authorization must
 modify their programs to reflect Federal
 program changes and must subsequently
 submit the modifications to EPA for
. approval The deadline by which the
 State must modify its program to adopt
 today's rule is July 1; 1991. These •
 deadlines can be extended in certain
 cases (40 CFR 271.21(e)(3)). Once EPA
 approves the modification, the State .
 requirements become Subtitle C RCRA
 requirements.
   States with authorized RCRA
. programs may already have
 requirements similar to those hi today's
 rule. These State regulations have not
 been assessed against the Federal
 regulations being promulgated today to
 determine whether they meet the tests
 for authorization. Thus, a State is not
 authorized to carry out these
 requirements in lieu of EPA until the
 State regulations are submitted to EPA
 for authorization approval. Of course,
 States with existing regulations'may
 continue to administer and enforce  their
. standards as a matter of State law.
   States that submit their official
 application for final authorization less
 than 12 months after the effective date
 of these standards are not required  to
 include standards  equivalent to these
 standards in their application. However
 the State must modify its program by the
 deadlines set forth in ง 271.21(e)..States
 that submit official applications for final
 authorization 12 months after the
 effective date of these standards must
 include standards  equivalent to these
 standards hi their application. 40 CFR
 271.3 sets forth the requirements a State
 must meet when submitting its final
 authorization application.
 V. Effective Date
   This rule will be effective 30 days
 after final promulgation. Section 3010(b)
 of RGRA provides  that regulations
 promulgated pursuant to subtitle C of
 RCRA shall take effect six months after
 the date of promulgation. However,
 section 3010(b)(l) provides for a shorter
 period if the Agency finds that the
 regulated community does not need six
 months .to comply with the new
 regulation.
   Since today's rule is designed to
 incorporate test methods already known
 to and used by the regulated  community
 and since use of the Second Edition of
 SW-846 is allowed, the Agency believes
 that the regulated community will not
 need six months to come into.
 compliance. Therefore, these
'amendments are effective 30 days after
promulgation, as provided under the
Administrative Procedure Act.

VI. Regulatory Analyses

A. Regulatory Impact Analysis

  Under Executive Order 12291, EPA
must determine whether a regulation is
"Major!' and, therefore, subject to the  .
requirement of a Regulatory Impact
Analysis. This rule will approve, but not
require, the use of these 47 methods
found in the Third Edition of SW-846
and Update L The 47 methods to be
finalized in this rule offer the regulated
community, in some cases, refinements
of existing methods and, in other cases,
new technology that provide alternative
methods to those now available for the
analysis of certain analytes or
parameters. This final rule entails no
additional testing or record keeping
burden and, therefore, no additional cost
burden to the regulated community.
  Therefore, the Agency does not
believe these added methods will result
in an annual effect on the economy of
$100 million or more; or a major increase
in costs or prices for consumers,
individual industries, Federal, State, or
local government agencies, or
geographic regions; or significant
adverse effects on competition,
employment, investment, productivity,
innovation, or in domestic or export
markets. The Agency believes that
today's rule is not a major rule under
Executive Order 12291 and, therefore,
has not prepared a Regulatory Impact
Analysis (RIA). This regulation was
submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget for review as required by
Executive Order 12291.

B. Regulatory'Flexibility Act

  Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. section 601-612, Pub. L. 96-
354, September 19,1980), whenever an
agency is required to publish a general
notice of.rulemaking for any proposed or
final rule, it must prepare and make
available for public comment a
regulatory flexibility analysis (RFA) that
describes the impact of the rule on small
entities (i.e., small businesses, small
organizations, and  small governmental
jurisdictions). No regulatory flexibility
analysis is required, however, if the
head of the agency certifies that the rule
will not have a significant impact on a.
substantial number of small entities.
  This rule will not require the purchase
of new instruments or equipment. The
regulation requires no new reports
beyond those now required. The   .   .
analytical techniques approved here can
either be handled by small facilities, or

-------
40266    Federal Resistor / Vol. 54, No. 188 / Friday, September 29, 1989 /  Rules and Regulations'
arc widely available by contract at a
reasonable price. Furthermore, small
entities may not need to use any of
these 47 methods. EPA is certifying that
this rule will nor have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities (ardefinedby
the RFA), Therefore, in accordance with
5 U.S.C. B05(b). I hereby certify that this.
rule will nothavB a significant adverse
economic impact on a substantial
number of HmalLcntitie*.

VH. Hsf of Subjected 40CFRFartป260
and 261      .               ,      -

  Hazardous waste, Reportihjfand
recordkeepJng requirements.
  Dated: September 15,1989.
WlllIainK.ReUly,    .          - .   •
Administrator.       ,              •

  For the reasons set out in the
preamble, title 40 of th'e Code of Federal
Regulations ia amended aa follows:
PART 260—HAZARDOUS WASTE
MANAGEMENT SYSTEM: GENERAL

  1. The authority citation for part 260
continues to read as follows:
  Authority: 42 U.S.C, 6905, 8912(a}r 6921
UUtragh 6927.6930,6934.6935,0937.6938,
6939, and 8974.

SubpartBrDefinittons

  Z Sectfon.26Q.il is amended by
revising the fourth reference in
paragraph (a) to-read as follows;

ง260.tf  References.
  (a) * * * 'Test Methods for.
Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/
Chemical Methods", EPA-Publicatiott
SW-848 [Second Edition, 1982 as
amended by Update I (April" 1984), and
Update-E (April 1985]. The Second
Edition of SW-846 and Updates. land H
are available from the National
Technical Information Service (NTIS),
5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA
22181, (703) 487-4800. The document
number is PB87^-120-291 and the cost is
$4855 for paper copies and $13.50 for
microfiche.
PART 261—IDENTIFICATION AND
LISTING OF HAZARDOUS WASTE

  3. The authority citation for Part 261
continues to read as .follows:
  Authority: 42 U.S.G. 6905, 6912(a), 6921, and
6922V              -  .

  4. Tables 2 and 3 of Appendix ni are
revised to read as follows:  .

Appendix HI—Chemical Analysis Test
Methods
  TABLE2—ANALYSIS METHODS-FOR INORGANIC CHEMICALS AND MJSCELLAWEOU&GROUPS OF ANALYTES CONTAINED IN sw-8461?
Compound "\ * ,
Abm&Mwn " ' 	 	 	 	 „..„*

Arwitifl * * •




dlJCfoffTl * * ' nir ... n ... i


Cobtff , ซ 	
COftfttfti.r. 	 n.. -' , 	 ,-, 	 ni,n.n...nm. ,-..-..,..... 	
Ifofl r 	 „ . . . •
(tIK* , , , , _ ,.:... • 	 	 „ 	 „,„„„„



Mofytxtonum 	 ซ——.-. 	 i . 	 	 r. 	 , 	 .... 	 .......... ........
NteM,,,,.. 	 .•.ซ 	


SG'tankffn 	 . 	 ซ.ซซป,..ป.. 	 	 	 ...ซ..ป 	
SiScort
Sifvtr , . , ,--,-
sfatom,,, 	 .1 	 in - • -,..-.— 	 —


2JfHj, , t , ,,,,,,,,,, 	 ,,,,,,„ 	 , 	 	 	 ..„........,„..„,
rvjff^M 	
Total Organic Hailda* ,. . . ,, 	 	 	 	 .„....,.„,
Sutlhftf • i- - - — -i ~ - -- 	
%tff!rtปtl : tr . T , -,, - 	 	 ,,.,,„,„, .,„,„„.,..,...„::.. -

PtWfKjISGI . ' ., ,.„„„„„ 	
Q| gmj GfOฎ99 * ..... ซ... 	 	 _...<..... 	 .......M.,..l...t.....^t.rT
Total Cdfforrrr. ....... 	 ....,„.....,.....,.., 	 -,.-, 	 „-„-,,„„—„-- -,- 	
Nitrirtt -,--,-- 	 ซ....__.m......
Chtofd^H,.. , 	 	 	 , 	 „..,.,.,. j. L , „ ,_

Afphtf-SiTRttin^ Rau^unr liotopM 	 -. 	 	 - 	 i.i.j-.-i mu-u .i-n
Rtrfiwn-??fl ป' •• " 	 •• 	 	 I..1-.-.-..--...-..1..

Third Edffion Method(s)
6010 „.„ 	 _......... 	 	 - — — —
SOIOf™ . ป 	 - 	 — •
6010 	 '. 	 	 	 	 _ —
601O
6010' 7090^ 709t 	 	 	 	 	 -,-, 	
QQ/^Q ' n..n....,.,,........r,..,,,,-rTTT 	
finlO — ซ"ซ "...TITITT^
6010 j. ..... ...... 	 	 „....,..„...„-„
60*70.

p|TfAi .... 	 	 .....iniinnt 	
601 0, .7210, 72.1 1 .——-........ 	 	 	 — 	
6010 7380 7381 _u ^_ ^,ป 	 	 n,,-.- - -
QO^Q m n ,, 	
6010; ... „„....„.. 	 	 	 ,,,„ -
6O10", 7460, 74S1 ..ซ..__'. 	 ..............._..—.„. 	 ........ 	 ..........

grj^O . , „,„...„ 	 ,,.,„,.,, 	
6010
7ggQ 	
6010 , 	 	 .........,„„, —
001 0 — - 	 	 	 _ 	 - 	 - 	
6010 . - . ซ... 	 	 _........_ 	

8010 7770 . .1. —M ...,............mm,,-,T,r
6010 7840 7841 .__._ _
6010, 7910, 7911 ._._..__...._ 	
6010V-7g5a, 7951 . 	 	 	

9022 lu^.,,,.....™.,.......,.,...,.................. 	 ......,„„„„„ 	

K)35, 9036 9039 .... ... .,....„...„...._...... nm.™....™,.,,,,.
9060 • 	 _ 	 	 	 	 	 	 . 	
goes 9066* 9067 .... 	 .... 	 ............... 	 ............. 	 	
9070, 9071 .............. 	 	
9131, 9132........-—..........- 	 '. 	
9200 ., . . „,...__.,..., 	 ......,.,..,.„..„. 	 	 	 „.....„„
9250. 9251 9252 „_——.-. 	
9*910 r- , M-T-.T -
93t5 ' ~~ — -. MUJIIIT.I 	 |
9320 	 ... 	 ................................ 	 ._ 	 _ 	 _ 	 ~

Second Edition
Meihod(s)
7040, 7041
7060,7061
7080, 7081
7T30, 7131
7190, 7101
7195.7196,7197
7420, 7421
7470, 7471
7520, 7521
7740, 7741
7760, 7761
9010
9020
9030
•Thซ Third Edklort-and- Hป Update* wiU supซreedซ the Second Edition and. Hs Updates 1 and It when it is adopted. Until tha Third EdHfon is adopted, in a finat rate,
th* Sปcood EdHSon and its updates must be used for regulatory purposes. Therefore, referenca to thป Third Edition, in these tables is provided for convenience. Thป
ThW Ed*on of SW-S49 and Updat* \ anป avaHabte- from the Government Printing- Office, Superintendent of Documents, Washington, DC 20402, (202) 738-3238,.
 document number S55-001-OOOOO-1.

-------
           Federal Register / Vol. 54. No. 188 /  Friday.  September  29, 1989 / Rules  and Regulations
40267
   * When Method 9066 is used ft must be preceded by the manual distillation specified in procedure 7.1 of Method 9065.. Just prior to distillation in Method 90S5,
adjust \he suttunc acid-preserved samgle to pH 4 with 1 +8 NaOH. After Wle manual distillation is completed, the autoanalyzer manifold is simplified by connecting the
re-sample line directly to the sampler.
  < v


                           '   TABLE 3—SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS METHODS CONTAINED IN SW-846 •
Title
Quality Contrail.. 	 	 '..,_._, .-,-,-„„„.,„.;....„„.„„.„„„„„„ 	 ,..„.,„

Quality Cnniml ... -„„„„„„„„„„,„„„ , „„„ , ; „
Method rvitBcซon Limit,,.,, 	 „. 	 ^ 	 ,.„„ ^
Data Reporting,,.:,,. -;„,„-,„,„, ,„„,.... 	 „ 	 ; 	 „ 	 	
Q^My Cofifrol Documentation... 	 	 	 __ 	 	
Reference* -„-,„„„„.,..„„.,„„.„,„,„„,.„.„„,„„„ 	 	 	
Choosing the Correct Procfldurft....;. 	 :. 	 ........... ~, ,,„„., „„„„,,„,>„„
Purpose 	 „„,„,_,„,„„„, , „ • „
• R
-------
40268    Federal Register / Vol 54. No. 188  / Friday. September 29. 1989:/ Rules and Regulations




                  TABLE 3—SAMPUNG AND ANALYSIS METHODS CONTAINED IN SW-846 •—Continued  .
Trtfa
Zne, Ftama AAS,,,,,,,, 	 ; 	 , _,
21m*, FufTMK4 AAS . 	 	 u.1,,,lu , _, 	 ..„„ 	 „ 	 „
Organic M*tytWr,.., 	 u
SampBog ConsidtraUona _ 	 „ 	 .1 _ 	 	 „
Sampl* PปpปniHnn UoHxxH , -,„,„,,„„, 4 -..-,„„.,„„ .,,,-,-,„-,„„„„„„, , 	 ,-,.,.
Extractor* and PnpanKnn , : ' 	 	 ........ 	 	 .„. , ' ,-,-.,„,,.;„„„, ,
Ctpanfc ExtracMcfl and Sair^ Preparation 	 , 	 ,._•.,„... 	 ;, 	 i;...,,'.,,,,,,, ,;,„..•
Stparatofy Fumvri UoukUJo^ J^taetion 	 	 	 	 	
CtoniirwouaUqukUJquid Extraction- .. r ....i 	 ..„.„ 	 	 ;,
Soyt4M Extraction..,,... 	 ..„„ 	 ; . , •
Uttrasonic Extraction 	 .:;.•„.„ 	 „ 	 u,u, 	 ^^, 	
WaataDikitibn 	 i____ 	 	 ;;. 	 • •
p"T>ปmxMrrip 	 ;.. 	 : 	 '. 	 „„„. ,„. 	 . • •
Protocol tor Analysis of Sorbent Cartridges from VOST 	 ~_ - ' _:
c|*ซfnipn-,,,n.. 	 , 	 7!,., „„ , ,' 	 ..;. 	
Ctoaoup, " * •
Alumina Column Cleanup _ — ,___ . . _ .. , 	 T.,,r 	 ; 	 , 	 „.„....
Alumina Column Cleanup and Separation of Petooteum Wastes.. 	
FtorbS Column Cleanup. __„.„...„_„ .._ 	 „„
Site* R*l CtaanMp,,,,,,.!.., .,„„„.„ „„
GaJ-Pormeafon Cteanup. „ .• . . ...... 	 	 	 „. 	
Add-Basa Partition Cteinup 	 . .. 	 	 	 ,-„„„,., .,,.,,..,,,,.,,,,J1
Sufi* Ctoamp 	 ..7 	 	 	 , 	 , „ .„ 	 ;, 	 „. 	 llx ^
Dttorminatfon of Organic Analytes ' .. 	 T ,-. 	 ..,..„, 	 ,
Gas Chromatographtc Methods.. . . . ., 	 ;,-.,. 	 uli_ •
Ga* Chromatografihy 	 ..„„., 	 ;. 	 _.....-.,., 	 ~ 	 „„ 	 ...„
Haks^fWtttud Votaka Organic... 	 _:,...... 	 	 	 	 uiiljl
S5R.1V10PCP 	 • 	 	 - ;, ,.„. 	 u 	
NoohsJogafMted Volatite Orgsric* 	 	 	 	 ;, ; 	 	
AromaBc VdaSa Organic* _., „ „„.„.... 	 	 ,,,.,..-.......,.,.„..,„,..,
Votaffla Organte Compounds In Water by Purga-and-Trap Capillary Column GC wim PID
•nd Etoetrotytic Conductivity Detector ft) Series.
Aooteln, AoylonHrfla, Apซtnnitrila „„,.., 	 ;•„„„ ,. 	 	 , 	 ,„„„.„„„„
Ptwx>% 	 	 --,-.„, ,„„ . 	 „. , ,
PWhalafa l=*tซf, 	 	 	 -. i: 	 	
* NHro*ปro!nwi 	 .-. 	 	 	 ,-,.,..,'.,,. . „,„„ 	 ...„•.. 	
CtOinochlOfioa PasticidQS and PCBa JK ArnrJora 	 „„ „,.' 	 ,,,,-„ .
NilroaromalSesaiyJCyeHe^etofvw 	 ,-„„,.. 	
Potyixietear Aromatic Hydrocarbons ^.^., 	 	 	 	 	 _...,,.,
Haibothซfsป
Chiorinatod Hydrocarbons 	 ™ _ „
Oroanophosphorua Pesticides 	 	 	 ulu^. 	 	 ,-..,, 	 ,. . „
Oroanophosohorua Pastiddsa: Capilloiy Column 	 	 , „
Chtorinalfld Hartfeaaซ 	 	 	 	 	 	
Gas ChromalooraDhJc/Maaa Spsctrosconic Mnttwvia ,., ,
GC/MSVolflffl*. 	
6C/MS SamivoJatites. Packed Column— 	
GC/MS for Volaffles Capillary Column _ .
GCVMS Semtvolatites, Capfllary Column 	
Analysis of Chlorinated Dioxins and Dibenzofurans..! 	
H^h Psrtofmanco Ucjuid Chromatographic Methods (HPLC) 	 	
PotynucSoar AromatSc Hydrocarbons 	 	 .
MtKdtanoMiS Screening Methods 	 	
Hซ*d3pa;o ___.__, 	 	 	 	 „.
Hexadacana ExtracCon and Screening of Purgeable Oraanict 	 	
M!sc*t!anซoua Tost Methods™ 	 ....
TotaJ and AmenaWa Cyanide (CotorlmeWc, Manual) 	 	 i 	 	
TolaJ and AnwnaKซ Cyanidd (Cotorimetric, Automated). ..„_ .. „ 	 	 	
Tolafr Organic Hafides fJOX). 	 „ „.
PurB€tbto Organic Halides (POX) ' 	 _„. .. 	 	
Total Organic HalkJes (TOX) by Neutron Activation Analysis 	 	 	
Add-SotoWaandAdd-lnsolubteSulfides 	 _ . 	 	
BrfraซaNซ Riilft^j 	 	 ,„ „, J .
SoJfat*. (Cotoritnatrie, Automated, CWoranilate) 	 „ 	 .. „
SuKata, (Co&rfmatric, Automated, Mothyllhymcl Blue. AA II) ™ 	 . 	
SuHate, (rorbkftrmtric) 	 _ 	 	
Total Organic Carbon™ „ . 	 . 	 „_ 	 .
PhaooScs, (Spectrophotomotric. Manual 4-AAP) 	 	 _. 	 .._. 	
PboooBes. (Cotorimetrfc, Automated 4-AAP) 	 .-.„ 	 	 	 	
PtwooScs, (Spectrophotomatric, MBTH) 	 . 	 . 	 	 	
Total Recovefabia Ofl and Greasa (Gravimetric, Separatory Funnel Extraction) 	 . ' 	
OM and Graasซ Extraction Method (or Sludge Samples 	 ™_ „ • ' '
Total Cot'ifOfm: Muitipla Tube Fermentation™ .. 	 	 .. „
Total CoKtorm: Mernbrana RKer.™™... 	 „ ' 	
Wi*rซtซ-- 	 ,-,,„ 	 „,
CWorkJa (Cotorimatrtc, Automated FerrtcyankJa AAI) 	 ' . . „_
Chtoddซ (Cotorimetrlc, Automated Ferrfcyanida AAli) 	 _„ . ... _. 	 	 ;„
CNorid* nWmatric, Mercuric NHrate). . „. 	 .
Third Edition •
Section No.
3.3
3.3
4.0
4.1
42
4.2.1
4^.1
4^1
4^.1
4.2.1 . .
4Ai, . . .
4A1
4^.1 . .
4.2.1
4^2
4^.2 .. .
4^2
4.22.
422
4.2.2
4^2
4.2.2
422
4.3
4.3.1
4.3.1
4.3.1 '
4^.1
4.3.1
4.3.1
4.3.1
4.3.1
4.3.1 .
4.3.1
4.3.1
4.3.1. -
4.3.1 .
4.3.1
4.3.1
4.3.1
4.3.t
4.3.1
4.3.1
4.3.2
4.3.2
432
4.3.2
4.3.2
4.3.2 •
4.3.3
4.3.3
4.4
4.4
4.4
5.0
5.0
ฃ0
5.0
5.O.. .
5.0
5.0 v '
5.0
5.0... .
5.0 . ...'. •;
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0 .
5.0
5.0
5.0
Method No.
•7950
•7951
	

3500
3510
3520
3540
3550
3580
5030
•5040
"'"""' 3600
3610
•3811
3620
3630
3640
3650
3660
8000
8010
8011-
8015
8020
8021
8030
8040
8060
8070
8080
8090
8100
8110
8120
8140
8141
8150
8240
8250
8260
8270
8280
8310
3810
3820
9010
9012
9020
9021
?9022
• 9030
9031
•9035
... -9036
•9038
•9060
•9065
•$9066
•9067
•9070
•9071
•9131
•9132
•9200
•9250
•9251
•9252
Second Edition
Section No.
alo"! 	


4.2
4.2
42
42
s!6


	
~42
.„_-
Ti
ป
8.1
8.1
8.1
8.1
8.1
8.1
8.1
8.1
8.1
8.1
8.1
8.2
8.2
8.2
8.2
8.3
8.3
5.0
9.0
9.0
9.0
9.0



•



.



	 „.

Method No.
	 	

3510
3520
3540
3550
5030
	
	
3530
........ .„„....
8015
8020
8030
8040
8060
8030
8090
8100
8120
8140
8150
8240
8250
8270

8310
5020
9010
9020
9030





'








-------
            Federal Register / Vql. 54, No. 188  /.Friday,  September  29, 1989  / Rules  and  Regulations      40269
                         TABLE S-T-SAMPLJNG AND ANALYSIS METHODS CONTAINED IN SW-846 •—Continued
" • Title " i x.
1 : - |
properties 	 ™.......<...........v....i..'.. .. ' ' •'.'-....
Multiple Extraction Procedure 	 . 	 ; 	 ;
Extraction Procedure for Oily Wastes...... ............. ........ ' '
pH Elecimmatrie Mmauirnmant .,„„,„ 	 „„ 	 ,..li; 	 	 	 ,.,,,
- pM Pftfiar Maitux* 	 ,,„ 	 t 	 ; 	 „ 	 _. 	
Sa8pH..- . 	 	 	 , 	
Specific Conductance. 	 ..„._. ™... „.„: 	 .• 	
Cation-Exchange Capacity of Soils (Ammonium Acetate); 	 .„.„_..
• • Cation-Exchange Capacity of Soils (Sodium Acetate)__....._...... 	 ...
Compatibility Test for Wastes and Membrane Liners...... ' .
Paint Filter Liquids Test. 	 	 	 	 ....
Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity, Saturated Leachate Conductivity,
Gross Alpha and Gross Beta 	 „. .„ „ .„..„ „...
Alpha-Emitting Radium Isotopes ... „„„..„_.„. .! 	 „.„.,
Radkim.228 	 „„,„.,„„.„„„..,„.,....,•,.„„„„
Introduction and Regulatory Definitions .„_.. 	 	 „.„„ 	 . 	 	 .
Jgritability 	 : 	 '. 	
Corrosivity......... 	 .„„ 	 „ 	 „ 	 	 „...„.._
Reactivity..,. „._.......„..„........„„....„•....„_. .„ ....;,.
Test Method to Determine Hydrogen Cyanide Released from V
Test Method to Determine Hydrogen Sulfide Released from W
. Extraction Pmnxliim ToKicily,,,, 	 , 	 '. 	 ,.„ 	 ....„,..,„„
Methods for Determining Characteristics... ._ „„„. „.....„.
(gnftability. 	 „ 	 	 	 	 .-. 	
Pensky-Martens Closed-Cup Method.....—— _.„_...„.__
Setaflash Closed-Cup Method . ... . 	 '
•• CofTCftMty 	 ..,...„..„,...„, „ , v. ' „
Corrosivity Toward Steel... ... _. „. 	 „„ 	
. Reactivity.. „ ^_ 	 ;.„. . „ _, 	 	
Toxicity;. . ... 	 	 „..„ ._.. 	 „.. „ „... 	 .......
Extraction Procedure (EP) Toxicity Test Method and Structural
Sampling Plan.™™.™™...™™.™™...™....^...™.^....™..™..™...;.......™^...
Design and Devatopmant .,..".,._,_„___„„„..,.,„..'..., 	 	 	 ,....„„„.
Implementation 	 _ 	 .„__... 	 „„.„.„
Sampling Methods 	 	 ; 	 	 ™; 	 	
Modified Method 5 Sampling Train, Appendix A and B 	
Source Assessment Sampling System (SASS) 	 	 „ _,
Volatile Organic Sampling Train 	 	 	 	
Ground Water Monitoring 	 	 	 	 .. .
Background and Objectives 	 „._ ... 	 ._„ 	
Relationship to the Regulations and to Other Documents.... 	 . 	
Revisions and Additions 	 „_ 	 ._.__. 	 . 	
Acceptable Designs and Practices 	 ._ 	 „ 	 _._ 	 ; 	
Unacceptable Designs and Practices 	 	 *. 	 	 	
Land Treatment Monitoring 	 „.. 	 ; 	 ... 	 •
Background 	 	 .. 	 „ 	
Treatment Zone ................. i....'
Regulatory Definition 	 	 ..„. 	
Monitoring and Sampling Strategy ........ ._...,... ............
. Analysts.- 	 	 „...„ 	 	
References and Bibliography 	 „ 	 	
Incineration 	 „ 	 _ 	



.__ 	 . 	
	 	

	 ; 	 ....; 	 	

and Intrinsic Permeability .•..„....




_


Vastes.. 	 	
astes 	 „.. .._ „„„„,.„....

	 	

	 ;. 	 ;. 	 ;...
..... 	 . 	 . —

Integrity Test 	 	

	 .. 	 . 	


_
~ 	 	 	 	




•




Introduction 	 	
Regulatory Definition 	 	 	 	 . 	 	
Waste Characterization Strategy 	 . 	 	
' Stack-Gas Effluent Characterization Strategy 	
Additional Effluent Characterization Strategy 	 	 	
Selection of Specific Sampling and Analysis Methods 	
References 	 	 	 _






	 .. 	
Third Edition
Section No.
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0-
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
7.0
7.1
7.2
7.3
7.3
7.3
7.4
8.0
8.1
8.1
8.1 ,
8.2
8.2
8.3
8.4
8.4
9.0
91
9.2
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
11.0 •
11.1
11.2
11.3
11.4
11.5
12.0
1ฃ1
12^
12.3
12.4
12.5
1i6
13.0
13.1
13.2
13.3
13.4
13.5
13.6
13.7
Method No.

•1320
•1330
9040
9041
9045
9050
•9080
•9081
9090
9095
•9100
•9310
•9315
•9320





._.........._.......:....
1010
1020
1110
1310
	 	
•0010
•0020
•0030


	 	
	















Second Edition
Section No.



9.0
	



9.0-



2.0
2.1.1
2.1.2
2.1.3

2.1.4
2.0
2.1.1
2.1.1
2.1.1
2.1.2
2.1.2
2.1.3
2.1.4
2.1.4
1.0
1011
1.2, 1.3, 1.4
	 .-.„......





	















Method No.



9040
	 	 	



9095









1010
1020
1110

1310
	 	 	





	















    -The Third Edition and its Updates will supersede the Second Edition and its Updates I and II when it is adopted. Until the Third Edition is adopted, in a final rule,
the Second Edition and its updates must be used for regulatory purposes. Therefore, reference to the Third Edition, in these tables is provided for convenience. The
Third Edition of SW-846 and Update I are available from the Government Printing Office, Superintendent of Documents, Washington, DC 20402, (202) 738-3238,
document number 955-001-00000-1.                                                                      .                     •
    This method may be used in conjunction with or In addition to the methods found in the Second Edition  of SW-846 as amended by Updates  I and II.
    tWhen Method 9066 is used it must be preceded by the manual distillation specified in procedure 7.1 of Method 9065. Just prior to distillation in Method 9065,
adjust the sutfuric acid-preserved sample to pH 4 with 1+9 NaOH. After the manual distillation is completed, the autoanalyzer manifold is simplified by connecting the
re-sample fine directiy to the sampler.           .                               •
[FR Doc. 89-22290 Filed 9-28-89; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-5O-M

-------

-------