&^
40834 Federal Register /Vol. 55, No. 194 / Friday. .October 5. 1990 /Rules and ;ttegulatigns___
request for revision .to any state
implementation plan. Each request for
revision to the state implementation
plan shall be considered separately in
light of specific technical, economic, and
environmental factors and in relation to
relevant statutory and regulatory
requirements.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Air pollution control, Participate
matter.
Dated: September 25,1990.
Kerrigan dough,
Acting Regional Administrator.
40 CFR Part 52, Subpart QQ is
amended as follows:
PART 52[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for Part 52
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401-7642.
Subpart QQSouth Dakota
2. Add a new § 52.218 to read as
follows:
§ 52.2182 PMu Committal SIP.
On July 121988, the State submitted a
Committal SIP for the Rapid City Group
II PMio area, as required by the PMio
implementation policy. The SIP commits
the State to continue to monitor for PMio
and to submit a full SIP if a violation of
the PMio National Ambient Air Quality
Standards is detected. It also commits
the State to make several revisions
related to PMio to the existing SIP.
[FR Doc. 90-23264 Filed 10-4-90; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 656O-50-M
40 CFR Part 61
[FRL-3850-7]
National Emission Standards for
Radon Emissions from
Phosphogypsum Stacks
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of compliance waiver.
SUMMARY: Today's action announces the
continuation of a limited compliance
waiver, pending reconsideration and
rulemaking, of subpart R of 40 CFR-part
61 ("Subpart R"), National Emission
Standards for Radon Emissions from
Phosphogypsum Stacks (54 FR 51654
December 15,1989). EPA is issuing this
compliance waiver pursuant to its
authority under Clean Air Act
112(c)(l)(B)(ii) and 40 CFR 60.10-60.11.
Today's limited compliance waiver,
which permits the distribution and use
cf phosphogypsum for agricultural
purposes, temporarily continues the
existing limited compliance waiver,
originally issued by the Administrator
on April 10,1990 (55 FR 13480 (April 10,
1990)), pending final action on the
ongoing rulemaking proceedings, but in
no event beyond June 1,1991.
EFFECTIVE DATE: Effective October 1,
1990, the requirement of subpart R of 40
CFR part 61 that phosphogypsum be
disposed in stacks or mines is
temporarily waived to permit the
distribution and use of phosphogypsum
for agricultural purposes, pending final
action on the ongoing rulemaking
proceedings (55 FR 13480 April 10,
1990)), but in no everit beyond June 1,
1991.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Craig Conklin, Environmental Standards
Branch, Criteria and Standards Division
(ANR-460), Office of Radiation
Programs, Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC 20460, (202)
475-9610.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Background
On October 31,1989, EPA
promulgated a final rule controlling
radionuclide air emissions from several
source categories, including
phosphogypsum stacks (to be codified at
40 CFR part 61, subpart R ("Subpart
R")). 54 FR 51653 (December 15,1989).
The standard requires, in part, the
disposal of phosphogypsum in stacks or
mines, thereby precluding alternative
uses of the material. EPA received
petitions from several parties, including
The Fertilizer Institute ("TFI"),
Consolidated Minerals, Inc. ("CM!"),
and U.S. Gypsum Co. ("USG") that EPA
reconsider this portion of the
phosphogypsum NESHAP. On April 10,
1990, EPA published in the Federal
Register a notice of limited
reconsideration of subpart R, a ,
rulemaking proposal which included
several alternatives to modify or
maintain subpart R, and a limited
compliance waiver which waived the
requirements of subpart R for those
owners or operators engaged in the
distribution or use of phosphogypsum
for agricultural purposes during the
current growing -season (not to extend
-beyond October 1,1990). 55 FR 13480.
The waiver was issued upon the finding
of the Administrator that such activity
presents no imminent endangerment to
public health, that the immediate
prohibition of such use would cause
great injury to many small farmers who
rely upon phosphogypsum, and that it
would be burdensome and
impracticable to issue limited waivers to
each affected owner or operator. In
addition, it was issued in light of the
scope of the simultaneously granted
limited reconsideration of subpart R and
in recognition that such waiver was
necessary to allow time for
implementation of alternative means of
soil conditioning.
EPA has received well over 100
comments on the proposed rule. EPA is
presently, evaluating each comment and
plans to issue a final rule shortly.
Today's action by EPA does not, and
should by no means'be construed to,
indicate any Agency predisposition on
the pending rulemaking.
B. Issuance of Compliance Waiver
For the same reasons announced in its
original limited compliance waiver, EPA
today continues in place the limited
compliance waiver for subpart R, as.
originally issued on April 10,1990, 55 FR
13480, pending final action on the
rulemaking proceeding also commenced
on April 10,1990, but in no event beyond
June 1,1991. Authority for this waiver
exists in Clean Air Act section
112(C)(l)(B)(ii) and 40 CFR 61.10-81.11.
EPA is accumulating and analyzing the
information necessary to issue a final
decision on the rulemaking proceeding,
and expects to take filial action shortly.
Pending that final decision, the waiver
bars enforcement against the use and
distribution of phosphogypsum for
agricultural purposes during this period.
Da.ted: September 28,1990.
William K.Reilly,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 90-23541 Filed 10-4-90, 8:45 am]
, BILING CODE 6560-SO-M
40 CFR Part 261
[EPA/OSW-FR-80-FFF; SWM-FRL-3S36-8]
RIN 2050-AA78
Hazardous Waste Management
System; Identification and Listing of
Hazardous Waste; Toxfcity
Characteristic; Hydrocarbon Recovery
Operations
AGENCY: EPA.
ACTION: Interim final rule with request
for comments.
SUMMARY: On March 29,1990, the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
promulgated revisions to the toxicity
characteristic, one of the tests used to
determine whether particular wastes are
regulated as hazardous under subtitle C
of the Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act (RCRA). New information
acquired by the Agency since the
promulgation of the Toxicity
-------
-------
Federal Register / Vol. 55, No. 194 / Friday, October'5. IS9Q / jglfLfS^
Characteristic (TC) rule indicates that
immediate application of the TC could
prevent continued operation of
hydrocarbon recovery and remediation
activities currently being conducted at a
number of petroleum refineries and
marketing terminals or bulk plants
handling crude pertroleum and
immediate products of petroleum
refining. The hydrocarbon recovery and
remediation activities of concern are
those that recover free-floating
hydrocarbons from the contaminated
acquifer, and include as part of the
recovery, reihjection of contaminated
ground water via undergound injection
wells or reinfiltration via an in filtration
gallery into the same aquifer from which
it was withdrawn.
The rAgency believes that cessation of
these activities may pose a substantially
greater risk to human health and the
environment fean tJiefir continued
operation under the existing regulatory
authorities. As a result of this new
information, the Agency is today
promulgating an interim final role which
extends the compliance date of the TC
rule for petrpteum refining facilities,
marketing terminals and belfe plants
engaged feithis specific recovery and
remediation operation fear 120> days. The
period of fee extension being
promulgated today will allow fee
Agency to solicit public comment on
issues related to these facilities, and to
consider aii available, pertinent
informatioa, and to develop the best
solution to protect human heaftti and the
environment
EFFECTIVE DATE: September 25,1930.
ADDRESSES! The public docket for this
rulemajdng is located at Room M2427,
U.S. Environmental Protection: Agency,
401M Street, SW.; Washington. DC
20460. The docket number assigned to
thia notice is F-9O-PRAS-FFFFF.
Persons who wish to comment on. the
notice should place the docket number
on their comments and provide an
original and: two copies.
The EPA RCRA docket is open from 9
a.m. to 4 p.mvt Monday through Friday,
excluding Federal holidays. To review
docket materials, the public must make
an appointment by calling (202] 475-
9372. A maximum of SO pages may be
copied from any regulatory docket at no
cost Additional- copies- cost $0.20 per.
page.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
For general information about this
notice, contact the RCRA/Superfund
Hotline at (800} 424-934B toll free* or
{202} 382-30OO inWashington. DC
metropolitan area. For information, on
specific aspects of this notice^, contact
David Topping of the,.Waste
Identification Branch, Office of Solid.
Waste (GS-333),ILS, Environmental
Protection Agency,. 401 M. Street SW.
Washington DC 20460, (202) 382-477O.
SUPPLEMENTARY {MFORR3ATKJN:
A. Background
On March 29, 1990 [55 FR 11798}, the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
promulgated the Toxicity Characteristic
final rale, to revise the existing EP
toxicity characteristic. The TC is one of
several characteristic used to identify
wastes which are defined as hazardous
and,, as a. consequence, are subject to
the subtitle C requirements of the
Resource Conservation and Recovery
ActflRCRA).
In today's notice, the Agency,
invoking good cause under the
Administrative Procedure Act is
promulgating an extended compliance.
date for the TC requirements to
petroleum refining facilities, marketing
terminals and bulk plants engaged in
hydrocarbon recovery and remediation
operations which involve the reinfection-
of contaminated ground water into
underground injection wells or
infiltration galleries for 120 days. As
discussed below, EPA belevesr [1 J Good
cause, under5tT.S".eV553, exists fora
short change in compKaice- date for this
narrow dass of TC wastes without prior
ncrtfce and comment^ and {^tender 5
U.S.C. 705, justice so requires a -
postponement of &e compliance- date.
During feelZffday period, these wastes
will not be a Federal hazadons waste.
Tm% extended compBanee date results
from new information -feat was brought
to the attention of the Agency after fee
promulgation of the TC finaJ rule. The
extended compliance date allows fee
immediate continued operation of
existing activities while careful
consideration is given to aS pertinent
information. >
B. HydrocarbottSecovery and
Water ..'. . . , .-.. . . ,. -
Subsurface investigations have
revealed that large quantities of free-
floating; and dissolved hydrocarbons axe
contained in ttte> shallow aquifees
beneath a number of petroleum
refineries marketing terminals and btdk
plants. Many of these facilities have
undertaken operations to remove the
free-floating hydrocarbons and
remediate the eoBtaminatiort Follow-on
phases of the operation may involve the
remediation of contaminated subsurface
soils and ground water. These recovery
and remediation, activities are currently
being conducted under fee direction of
various State and local environmental
and water quality authorities. : '
It is the first phase of such operations
that is of immediate concern to the
Agency. This phase primarily consists of
pumping the free-floating hydrocarbons
from the aquifer beneath the facility.
Some of these operations involve two
pumping systems. One pumping system
is used to bring the free-floating
hydrocarbons to the surface while the
second pumping system reinjects
contaminated ground water to facilitate
the pumping of the free-floating
hydrocarbons and prevent farther
migration of the contaminants in the
aquifer. In two pomp systems, the
ground water is pumped to create a cone
of depression to promote collection of
free-floating hydrocarbons and thereby
facilitate recovery/removal of fee
hydrocarbons from fee aquifer. Thi* .
pumped ground water, with its high
saturation, concentrations of dissolved
hydrocarbon (particularly benzene, due
to the equilibration between the free-
floating hydrocarbons and the water}, is
returned to fee aquifer via an injection
well or mfiltration gallery. The
remj'ecfon/infytration establishes a
Hydraohc gradient feat feefpw to contain
fee contamination and maintains fee
water table for purposes of fee
hydrocarbon recovery.' Because of fee
significantly high quantities of dissolved
hydrocarbons in fee water feat iis '
returned to the aquifer, immediate ,
application of fee TC to this ground
water may result in classification of fee
reinjectibn/infiltration as disposal of a
hazardous waste; Iff this occurs, use of
UIC Class V wells [wnicli many of ftese
operations currently use) would no
longer be authorized^ Automatic
redassification of fee well as dass IV
weHs (injection of hazardous waste info
or above an underground source of-
drinking water (DSDWJ would OCCUR in
most cases,. Class IV wells are
prohibited under section 302O of RCRA,
C. Environmental Benefits
The extended compliance date being
promulgated in today's, notice will allow
the Agency to seek and consider all .
pertinent information, concerning
hydrocarbon recovery operations* and
will provide time for the Agency to
develop the best long-term, solution to
protect human, health and fee
environment. The impacts feat RCRA
may have on these operations as a result
of application of the TC {M-, permit ;
requirements, corrective action notices*
etc.} may prohibit temporarily, if not
.permanently, fee reiaiection/infiltratioa
of ground water which, industry asserts
is an integral part of fee recovery phase
of fee operation* Reiajectionof fee
ground water may serve two main
-------
40836 Federal Register / Vol. 55. No. 194 / Friday. October 5.
purposes: it facilitates pumping, thus
increasing the recovery rate for free-
floating product, and lessens further
migration Of the contaminant plume
within the aquifer. Without reinjection,
industry argues that the recovery phase
may take longer to complete, there is
probable risk of further contamiriation
of subsurface soils, and the plume of
contaminated ground water is likely to
spread. Furthermore, they argue that it is
not practicable to treat the
contaminated ground water to levels
below those specified in the TC before
its reinjection during the recovery phase
since the water is returned to the aquifer
mixes and equilibrates with the
remaining contaminated ground water
and free-floating product. Therefore, it
attains the same saturation , .
concentration of dissolved hydrocarbon
as was present before pumping and
treatment. The ground water will
continue to attain the high saturation
levels of dissolved hydrocarbon once
returned to the aquifer until the source
of contamination (i.e., the free-floating
product) is removed. Industry argues
that it is both environmentally beneficial
and technically feasible to continue
operation in this manner and, once .
recovery offree product is complete,
begin ground water and soil
remediation.
D. Interim Final Rule .*
EPA is invoking two authorities for
this immediate effective interim final
action. First,.EPA is invoking the good
cause exemptions in sections 553(b)(3)
and 553(d)(3) of the Administrative
Procedure Act to immediately change
the compliance date with requirements
imposed by the TC for wastes involved
in specific product recovery activities.
Second, EPA is invoking the authority in
5 U.S.C. 705. The ground water will not
be a Federal hazardous waste during the
period of the extension. EPA has only
very recently received information -
regarding these operations and believes
that continued operation of these
actions are important for environmental
protection. As discussed above, without
the immediate change of the compliance
date for these operations, such activities
might cease. EPA believes that requiring
these facilities to meet all applicable
RCRA and SDWA requirements by the ,
September 25,1990 effective date of the
TC rule is both impracticable and
contrary to public interest. Therefore, at
petroleum refineries and marketing
terminals or bulk plants currently
engaged in hydrocarbon recovery
operations Stemming from handling
crude petroleum and immediate
products of petroleum refining, the r
compliance date for the TC is extended'
until January 25,1991. Facilities with
existing contracts for construction of
these operations are also included
within the scope of today's notice.
EPA is today soliciting comments on
regulatory approaches for issues
involved in today's notice and is
considering further extending the
compliance requirements under a
separate regulatory proposal. Until EPA
evaluates fully the issues involved in
activities, the Agency believes that the
current State oversight of these
activities and continuing Agency
involvement in these issues will provide
adequate assurances against
development of any imminent threat to
human health and the environment. As
discussed'above, if such a change is not
made, environmentally beneficial
activities would, at a minimum, be
suspended for many months, possibly
increasing the potential threat to human
health and the environment due to
futher migration of the contamination.
E. State Authority
1. Applicability of Rules in Authorized
States
Under section 3006 of RCRA, EPA
may authorize qualified States to
administer and enforce the RCRA
program within the State. Following
authorization, EPA retains enforcement
authority under section 3008,3013, and
7003 of RCRA although authorized
States have primary enforcement
responsibility. The standards, and . .
requirements for authorization are.found
in 40 CFR part 271.
Prior to HSWA, a State with final
authorization administered its
hazardous waste program in lieu of EPA
administering the Federal program in .
that State. The Federal requirements no
longer applied in the authorized State,
and EPA could not issue permits for any
facilities that the State was authorized
to permit. When hew, more"stringent .
Federal requirements wers promulgated
or enacted, the State was obliged to
enact equivalent authority within
specified time frames. New Federal
requirements did not take effect in an
authorized State until the State adopted
the requirements as State law. In
contrast, under RCRA section 3006(g) (42
U.S.C. 6926(g}), new requirements and
prohibitions imposed by'HSWA take--
effect in authorized States at the same
time that they take effect in '
nonauthorized States. EPA is directed to
carry out these requirements'and ;
prohibitions in authorized States, :
including the issuance of permits, until
the State is granted authorization to do
so. While States must still adopt
HSWA-related provisions as State law
to retain final authorization, HSWA
applies in authorized States in the
interim.
2. Effect on State Authorizations
EPA will implement the provisions of
today's interim final rule in authorized
States until their programs are modified
to adopt the final toxicity characteristic
and the modification to the State's
program is approved by EPA.
Implementation of today's interim final
rule beyond the date of a State's
receiving final authorization for the
toxicity characteristic depends upon . ,
actions taken by the State, as discussed.
below. EPA will implement the
provisions of today's rule in ; . ....--,
nonauthorized States. Today's rule,,..';,. .
extends the compliance date for . -.,
requirements imposed in the final ..-_.. 1-1
Toxicity Characteristic final regulation..,
(see 55 FR11798, March 29,1990} for,',.;. j
certain hydrocarbon recovery.. . :.:.-,
operations.. ... ; ; . .
The Toxicity Characteristic was
promulgated pursuant to a HSWA
provision and must be adopted-by
States which intend to retain final
authorization. However,-today's rjule -
provides, for 120 days, a less stringent
standard for certain hydrocarbon ' -,:
recovery and remediation operations
than would be imposed in the, final v=('*-.
Toxicity Characteristic as promulgated!:!
In order to promote environmentally ,-'-^
beneficial hydrocarbon recovery . .:
operations,.today's interim final rule .
provides that these -wastes would not be.
hazardous wastes under the Federal ...-«
regulations until January 25,1991, and
States would not be required to mandate
their management .as such in order to
retain RCRA authorization. However, V
Section 3009 of RCRA provides that
States may impose more stringent
requirements than those imposed under -
Federal regulations. States, whether.
using RCRA authorities (e.g., authorities
under State law where States have '. ',.'.'
received final authorization to . ; ...
implement the toxicity characteristic
provisions in lieu of their :. . -
implementation by EPA), or other State
authorities under other statues, may
impose hazardous waste requirements
on such operations, or may require either
more stringent conditions' upon "'
management of these wastes.
F. Regulatory Requirements
1. Regulatory Impact Analysis , .
Under Executive Order 12291, EPA ,
must determine whether a regulation :is
"major," and therefore subject to the
requirement of a Regulatory-Impact ;'-
Analysis. The overall effect of today's
-------
Federal Register / Vol. 55, No. 194 / Friday, October 5, 1990 /Roles and Regulations 40837
rule is to extend the compliance date for
requirements imposed by the final
Toxicity Characteristic rule for certain
limited hydrocarbon recovery
operations. No sampling or analysis
requirements are imposed in today's
rule. The net effect of this proposal is to
extend cost savings on a temporary
basis to certain segments of the
regulated community. Consequently, no
regulatory impact analysis is required.
2. Regulatory Flexibility Act
Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility
Act, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, whenever an
agency is required to publish a General
Notice of Rulemaking for any proposed
or final rule, it must prepare and make
available for public comment a
regulatory flexibility analysis that
describes the impact of the rule oh small
entities (i.e., small businesses, small
organizations, and small governmental
jurisdictions). No regulatory flexibility
analysis is required, however, if the
head of the Agency certifies that the rule
will not have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The extension of the compliance date
for the Toxicity Characteristic
requirements promulgated today for
certain limited hydrocarbon recovery
activities in this rule is deregulatory in
nature arid thus will only provide
beneficial opportunities for entities that
may be affected by the rule.
Accordingly, I hereby certify that this
regulation will not have a significant
economic impact of a substantial
number of small entities. This
regulation, therefore, does not require a
regulatory flexibility analysis.
3, Paperwork Reduction Act
There are no. reporting, notification, or
recordkeeping (information) provisions
in this rule. Such provisions, were they
included, would be submitted for
approval to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork
Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 281
Hazardous waste, recycling.
Dated: September 24,1990.
William K. Reilly,
Administrator.
For reasons set out hi the preamble,
chapter I of title 40 of the CFR part 261 is
amended as follows:
PART 261IDENTIFICATION AND
LISTING OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
1. The authority citation for part 261
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6905, 6912(a), 6921,
6922, and 6938.
2. Section 261.4 is amended by adding
paragraph (b)(il) to read as follows:
§261.4 Exclusions.
* * *. . * * '
(b) * *. "..
(11) Ground water that exhibits the
Toxicity Characteristic in § 261.24 of
this part that is reinjected or infiltrated
pursuant to existing hydrocarbon
recovery operations undertaken at
petroleum refineries,- and marketing
terminals or bulk plants handling crude
petroleum and immediate products of
petroleum refining until January 25,1991.
*****
[FR Doc. 90-23542 Filed 10-4-90; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 650O-SO-M
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73
[MM Docks. No. 89-560; RM-6952]
Radio Broadcasting Services;
Dillingham, AK
AGENCY: Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: This document allots FM
Channel 256A to Dillingham, Alaska, as
that community's first local broadcast
service, in response to a petition for rule
making filed by Jackson McCormick. See
54 FR 51424, December 15,1989.
Coordinates utilized for Channel 256A at
Dillingham are 59-02-30 and 158-27-30.
(See Supplementary Information, infra.]
With this action, the proceeding is
terminated.
DATES: Effective November 16,1990; the
window period for filing applications on
Channel 256A at Dillingham, Alaska,
will open on November 17,1990, and
close on December 17,1990.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nancy Joyner, Mass Media Bureau, (202)
634-6530. Questions related to the
window application filing process '
should be addressed to the Audio
Services Division, FM Branch, Mass
Media Bureau, (202) 632-0394.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a
synopsis of the Commission's Report
and Order, MM Docket No. 89-560,
adopted September 19,1990, and
released October 2,1990. The full text of
this Commission decision is available
for inspection and copying during
normal business hours in the FCC
Dockets Branch (room 230), 1919 M
Street, NW,, Washington, DC. The
complete text of this decision may also
be purchased from the Commission's
copy contractors, International -..-..',.
Transcription Service, (202) 857-3800,
2100 M Street, NW., suite 140, .
Washington, DC 20037.
Interested parties should note that the
petition for rule making hi this
proceeding was filed prior to October 2,
1989, and therefore, applicants for ,
Channel 256A at Dillingham may avail
themselves of the provisions of Section
73.213(c) of the Commission's Rules. See
47 CFR 73.213(c).
List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73
Radiobroadcasting.
47 CFR PART 73[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 73 ,
continues to read as follows: " '
Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154,303.
§73.202 [Amended]
2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM
Allotments, is amended under Alaska,
by adding Dillingham, Channel 256A.
Federal Communications Commission.
Kathleen B. Levitz,
Deputy Chief, Policy and Rules Division
Mass Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. 90-23666 Filed 10-4-90; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-M
47 CFR Part 73
[MM Docket No. 89-456; RM-6831]
Radio Broadcasting Services; Vero
Beach, FL
AGENCY: Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: This document, at the request
of Media VI Flprida, (formerly Treasure
Coast Media, Inc.), substitutes Channel
269C3 for Channel 269A at Vero Beach,
Florida, and modifies its license for
Station WAVW(FM) to specify
operation on the higher powered
channel/See 54 FR 43087, October 20,
1989. Channel 269C3 can be allotted to
Vero Beach in compliance with the
Commission's minimum distance
separation requirements. The
coordinates for this allotment are North
Latitude 27-38-18 and West Longitude
80-23-54. With this action; this
proceeding is terminated. .
EFFECTIVE DATE: November 16,1990.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nancy J. Walls, Mass Media, (202) 634-
6530. ,
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a
synopsis of the Commission's Report
and Order, MM Docket No. 89-456,
-------
------- |