t-sSfIB?^fS*iliSr !*£it^fteS5KH;S^7i0}^l^rSSs.fM?i^fe4^%^*:i  -

                                                                                     ;
S#|^£p>|-::i:|,:;XSSfJ»Ci:';';f;W s-^^ipy^^-^^^-^f^^                                 :


                            «
                                            Fax: 2
                                          jett.george@epa:gov
                        George M. Jett
                        Chemical Engineer
                   U '3 Environmental Protection Agency
                  Engineering and Analysis Division (4303)
                     1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
                      Washington, D.C. 20460

-------

-------
            DEVELOPMENT DOCUMENT  .

                :   , for  .

EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS

                   for thei

 NONFERROUS METALS FORMING AND METAL POWDERS

            POINT SOURCE CATEGORY


                   VOLUME II

                Lee M. Thomas
                Administrator
             Lawrence J. Jensen
      Assistant Administrator for Water
   :        William A. Whittington
                 - Director
  Office of Water Regulations and Standards
      Devereaux Barnes, Acting Director
       Industrial Technology Division
         Ernst P. Hall, P.E., Chief
          Metals Industries Branch
              Janet K. Goodwin .
          Technical Project Officer
               September 1986
    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
               Office of Water
  Office of Water Regulations and Standards.
       Industrial Technology Division
   •        Washington, D.C.  20460

-------

-------
This document is divided into three volumes.  Volume I contains Sections


I through IV.  Volume II contains Sections V and VI.  Volume III contains


Sections-VII through XVI.                ;
   SECTION I  i


   SECTION II.


   SECTION III


   SECTION IV:


   SECTION V


   SECTION VI;


   SECTION VII


   SECTION VIII


   SECTION IX


   SECTION X


   SECTION XI;


   SECTION XII


   SECTION XIII


   SECTION XIV


   SECTION XV.


   SECTION XVI
 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS


 RECOMMENDATIONS        \


 INTRODUCTION           ;


 INDUSTRY SUBCATEGORIZATION


 WATER USE AND WASTEWATER CHARACTERISTICS


 SELECTION OF POLLUTANT PARAMETERS   .


 CONTROL AND TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY   •

                        i
 COST OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT AND CONTROL


 BEST PRACTICABLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY CURRENTLY AVAILABLE
                        i
             '•  ,         l

 BEST AVAILABLE TECHNOLOGY ECONOMICALLY ACHIEVABLE
                        I

 NEW SOURCE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS


 PRETREATMENI STANDARDS .
                        i

 BEST CONVENTIONAL POLLUTANT CONTROL TECHNOLOGY


 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS        ;.      .   "


 GLOSSARY      .         !
                        !
                        I
. REFERENCES
                                       	i

-------

-------
                             CONTENTS
 Section
 II
 III
 IV
V
VI
VII
                                                          319
 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
   Methodology
   Technology Basis for Limitations
     and Standards

 RECOMMENDATIONS    '
   BPT and BAT Mass Limitations
   New Source Performance Standards
   Pretreatment Standards for Existing
     and New Sources

 INTRODUCTION       !
   Legal Authority  .                -   ''
   Data  Collection and  Utilization
   Description of  the Nonferrous
     Metals  Forming Category
   Description"of  Nonferrous  Metals
     Forming  Processes
                    I
 INDUSTRY  SUBCATEGORIZATION
        Evaluation  and  Selection of
     Subcategorization  Factors
   Production  Normalizing Parameter
     Selection
   Description of'Subcategories

WATER USE AND WASTEWATER CHARACTERISTICS  413
  Data Sources      .
  Water Use and Wastewater Characteristics

SELECTION OF POLLUTANT PARAMETERS        ing
  Rationale for Selection of Pollutant
    Parameters               -    .
  Description of Pollutant Parameters
  Pollutant Selection  by Subcategory
                                                          385
               CONTROL AND TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY
                 End-of-Pipe Treatment Technologies
                   Major Technologies
                   Major Technology Effectiveness
                   Minor Technologies
                 In-Process Pollution Control Techniques
                                         1311

-------
Section

VIII
IX
X
 XI
                      CONTENTS (Continued)
COST OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT AND CONTROL  1461
  Summary of Cost Estimates
  Cost Estimation Methodology
  Cost Estimates for Individual Treatment
    Technologies
  Compliance Cost Estimation
  Nonwater Quality Aspects

BEST PRACTICABLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY       1553
  CURRENTLY AVAILABLE
    Technical Approach to BPT
    Lead-Tin-Bismuth Forming Subcategory
    Magnesium Forming Subcategory
    Nickel-Cobalt Forming Subcategory
    Precious Metals Forming Subcategory
    Refractory Metals Forming Subcategory
    Titanium Forming Subcategory
    Uranium Forming Subcategory
    Zinc Forming Subcategory
    Zirconium Hafnium Forming Subcategory
    Metal Powders Subcategory
    Application of Regulation in Permits

BEST AVAILABLE TECHNOLOGY ECONOMICALLY    1757
  ACHIEVABLE
    Technical Approach to BAT
    BAT Option Selection
    Regulated Pollutant Parameters
    Lead-Tin-Bismuth Forming Subcategory
    Magnesium Forming Subcategory
    Nickel-Cobalt Forming Subcategory
    Precious Metals Forming Subcategory
    Refractory Metals Forming Subcategory
    Titanium Forming Subcategory
    Uranium Forming Subcategory
    Zinc  Forming  Subcategory
    Zirconium-Hafnium Forming Subcategory
    Metals  Powders  Subcategory

  NEW  SOURCE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS         1915
    Technical Approach to NSPS
    NSPS Option  Selection
    Regulated Pollutant Parameter
    New Source Performance  Standards
                                11

-------
 Section
XII
XIII


XIV

XV

XVI
                       CONTENTS  (Continued)
PRETREATMENT  STANDARDS
   Introduction of:Nonferrous Metals
    Forming Wastewater  into POTW
   Technical Approach  to Pretreatment
   PSES and PSNS Option  Selection
   Regulated Pollutant Parameters
   Pretreatment Standards
                  !
BEST CONVENTIONAL;POLLUTANT CONTROL
   TECHNOLOGY      ,

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS \

GLOSSARY         .;
                  i
REFERENCES
2187


2189

2191

2211
                              ill

-------

-------An error occurred while trying to OCR this image.

-------
Table

V-9


V-10


V-ll


V-12



V-13



V-14




V-15


V-16


V-17


V-18



V-19



V-20



V-21
LIST OF TABLES (Continued)

      Title                             Page

   Lead-Tin-Bismuth Rolling Spent        493
     Neat Oils

   Lead-Tin-Bismuth Drawing Spent        494
     Emulsions

   Lead-Tin-Bismuth Drawing Spent        495
     Soap Solution's

   Lead-Tin-Bismuth Drawing Spent        496
     Soap Solutions Raw Wastewater
     Characteristics

   Lead-Tin-Bismuth Extrusion Press      497
     or Solution Heat Treatment
     Contact Cooling Water

   Lead-Tin-Bismuth Extrusion Press      498
     Solution Heat Treatment Contact
     Cooling Water Raw Wastewater
     Characteristics

   Lead-Tin-Bismuth Extrusion Press      501
     Hydraulic Fluid Leakage

   Lead-Tin-Bismuth Swaging Spent        502
     Emulsions

   Lead-Tin-Bismuth Continuous Strip     503
     Casting Contact Cooling Water

   Lead-Tin-Bismuth Continuous Strip     504
     Casting Contact Cooling Water
     Raw Wastewater Characteristics

   Lead-Tin-Bismuth Semi-Continuous      506
     Ingot Casting Contact Cooling
     Water

   Lead-Tin-Bismuth Semi-Continuous      507
     Ingot Casting Contact Cooling
     Water Raw Wastewater Characteristics '

   Lead-Tin-Bismuth Shot Casting Con-    510
     tact Cooling Water
                            VI

-------
                   LIST OF TABLES (Continued)
Table

V-22




V-23


V-24


V-25




V-26


V-27




V-28

V-29

V-30


V-31


V-32


V-33


V-34

     i

V-35

V-36
  Title                              Paqe
Lead-Tin-Bismuth Shot Casting         511
  Contact Cooling Water Raw
  Wastewater

Lead-Tin-Bismuth Shot Forming Wet     514
  Air Pollution Control Slowdown

Lea.d-Tin-Bismuth Alkaline Cleaning    515
  Spent Baths

Lead-Tin-Bismuth Alkaline Cleaning    516
  Spent Baths Raw Wastewater
  Sampling Data

Lead-Tin-Bismuth Alkaline Cleaning    519
  Rinse      ]

Lead-Tin-Bismuth Alkaline Cleaning    520
  Rinse Raw Wfastewater Sampling
  Data

Magnesium Rolling Spent Emulsions     524

Magnesium Forging Spent Lubricants    525

Magnesium Forging Contact Cooling     526
  Water

Magnesium Forging Equipment Cleaning  527
  Wastewater

Magnesium Direct Chill Casting Con-   528
  tact Cooling Water
Magnesium Surface Treatment Spent     529
  Baths
Magnesium Surface Treatment Spent     530
  Baths Raw Wastewater Sampling Data
             I      •.
Magnesium Surface Treatment Rinse     535
             i
Magnesium Surface Treatment Rinse     536
  Raw Wastewater Sampling Data
                            VII

-------
                   LIST OF TABLES   (Continued)
Table

V-37


V-38


V-39



V-40


V-41

V-42


V-43


V-44


V-45


V-46



V-47


V-48

V-49


V-50


V-51
Title                      '           Paqe
Magnesium Sawing or Grinding Spent     548
  Emulsions

Magnesium Wet Air Pollution Control    549
  Slowdown

Magnesium Wet Air Pollution Control    550
  Slowdown Raw Wastewater Sampling
  Data

Nickel-Cobalt Rolling Spent Neat       552
  Oils

Nickel-Cobalt Rolling Spent Emulsions  553

Nickel-Cobalt Rolling Spent Emulsions  554
  Raw Wastewater Sampling Data

Nickel-Cobalt Rolling Contact Cooling  558
  Water

Nickel-Cobalt Rolling Contact Cooling  559
  Water Raw Wastewater Sampling Data

Nickel-Cobalt Tube Reducing Spent      566
  Lubricants

Nickel-Cobalt Tube Reducing Spent      567
  Lubricants Raw Wastewater Sampling
  Data

Nickel-Cobalt Drawing Spent Neat       570
  Oils

Nickel-Cobalt Drawing Spent Emulsions  571

Nickel-Cobalt Drawing Spent Emulsions  572
  Raw Wastewater Sampling Data

Nickel-Cobalt Extrusion Spent          574
  Lubricants

Nickel-Cobalt Extrusion Press and      575
  Solution Heat Treatment Contact
  Cooling Water
                            Vlll

-------
                   LIST OF TABLES (Continued)
Table
 Title
Paqe
V-52





V-53


V-54




V-55


V-56


V-57




V-58


V-59


V-60




V-61




V-62





V-63


V-64
Nickel-Cobalt Extrusion Press and     576
  Solution Heat Treatment Contact
  Cooling Water Raw Wastewater
  Sampling Data

Nickel-Cobalt Extrusion Press         579
  Hydraulic Fluid Leakage

Nickel-Cobalt Extrusion Press         580
  Hydraulic Fluid Leakage Raw
  Wastewater :Sampling Data

Nickel-Cobalt Forging Spent           584
  Lubricants

Nickel-Cobalt; Forging Contact         585
  Cooling Water

Nickel-Cobalt Forging Contact         586
  Cooling Water Raw Wastewater
  Sampling Data

Nickel-Cobalt, Forging Equipment       590
  Cleaning Wastewater
             i
Nickel-Cobalt; Forging Press           591
  Hydraulic Fluid Leakage

Nickel-Cobalt Forging Press           592
  Hydraulic Fluid Leakage Raw
  Wastewater 'Sampling Data

Nickel-Coba.lt, Metal Powder            595
  Production Atomization
  Wastewater
      •   ' '. •  i     •       •         •   •
Nickel-Cobalt Metal Powder            596
  Production Atomization
  Wastewater Raw Wastewater
  Sampling Data

Nickel-Cobalt;Stationary Casting      601
  Contact Cooling Water
Nickel-Cobalt;Vacuum Melting          602
  Steam Condensate
                             IX

-------
Table
LIST OF TABLES (Continued)

  Title
V-65



V-66



V-67




V-68


V-69



V-70


V-71



V-72

V-73


V-74


V-75



V-76


V-77



V-78

V-79
   Nickel-Cobalt Vacuum Melting          603
     Steam Condensate Raw- Wastewater
     Sampling Data

   Nickel-Cobalt Annealing and           606
     Solution Heat Treatment
     Contact Cooling Water

   Nickel-Cobalt Annealing and           607
     Solution Heat Treatment
     Contact Cooling Water Raw
     Wastewater Sampling Data

   Nickel-Cobalt Surface Treatment       611
     Spent Baths

   Nickel-Cobalt Surface Treatment       612
     Spent Baths Raw Wastewater
     Sampling Data

   Nickel-Cobalt Surface Treatment       620
     Rinse

   Nickel-Cobalt Surface Treatment       621
     Rinse Raw Wastewater Sampling
     Data

   Nickel-Cobalt Ammonia Rinse           635

   Nickel-Cobalt Ammonia Rinse Raw       636
     Wastewater Sampling Data

   Nickel-Cobalt Alkaline Cleaning       639
     Spent Baths

   Nickel-Cobalt Alkaline Cleaning       640
     Spent Baths Raw Wastewater
     Sampling Data

   Nickel-Cobalt Alkaline Cleaning       646
     Rinse

   Nickel-Cobalt Alkaline Cleaning       647
     Rinse Raw Wastewater Sampling
     Data

    Nickel-Cobalt Molten Salt Rinse      654

    Nickel-Cobalt Molten Salt Rinse      655
      Raw Wastewater Sampling Data

-------
Table
LIST OF TABLES .(Continued)

    Title
Page
V-80


V-81'



V-82


V-83


V-84



V-85


V-86



V-87


V-88



V-89

V-90


V-91


V-92



V-93


V-94
    Nickel-Cobalt Sawing or Grinding     661
     1 Spent Emulsions

   Nickel-Cobalt Sawing or Grinding      662
     Spent Emulsions Raw Wastewater
     Sampling Data

   Nickel-Cobalt Sawing or Grinding      685
     Rinse    • .   .

   Nickel-Cobalt Steam Cleaning          686
     Condensate

   Nickel-Cobalt Hydrostatic Tube        687
     Testing and Ultrasonic Testing
     Wastewater

   Nickel-Cobalt Dye Penetrant Testing   688
     Wastewater
               i          •
   Nickel-Cobalt Dye Penetrant Testing   689
     Wastewater Raw Wastewater Sampling
     Data .     !  ••
      -  ...     |
     •          '
   Nickel-Coball; Wet Air Pollution       691
     Control Slowdown

   Nickel-Cobalt Wet Air Pollution       692
     Control Slowdown Raw Wastewater
     Sampling Data
               • i .'•
   Nickel-Cobalt; Electrocoating Rinse    .697
               t •      '
   Precious Metals Rolling Spent Neat    698
     Oils

   Precious Metals Rolling Spent         699
     Emulsions

   Precious Metals Rolling Spent         700
     Emulsions Raw Wastewater
     Sampling Data
                i
   Precious Metals Drawing Spent         705
     Neat Oils
                I
   Precious Metals Drawing Spent         706
     Emulsions
                              XI

-------
                   LIST OF TABLES (Continued)
Table
 Title
Paqe
V-95



V-96


V-97



V-98


V-99


V-100



V-101


V-102



V-103



V-104


V-105


V-106


V-107



V-108
Precious Metals Drawing Spent         707
  Emulsions Raw Wastewater
  Sampling Data

Precious Metals Drawing Spent Soap    710
  Solutions

Precious Metals Metal Powder          711
  Production Atomization
  Wastewater

Precious Metals Direct Chill Casting  712
  Contact Cooling

Precious Metals Shot Casting Contact  713
  Cooling Water

Precious Metals Shot Casting Contact  714
  Cooling Water Raw Wastewater
  Sampling Data                         :

Precious Metals Stationary Casting    717
  Contact Cooling Water

Precious Metals Semi-Continuous and   718
  Continuous Casting Contact Cooling
  Water

Precious Metals Semi-Continuous and   719
  Continuous Casting Contact Cooling
  Water Raw Wastewater Sampling Data

Precious Metals Heat Treatment Con-   723
  tact Cooling Water

Precious Metals Surface Treatment     724
  Spent Baths

Precious Metals Surface Treatment     725
  Rinse

Precious Metals Surface Treatment'     726
  Rinse Raw Wastewater Sampling
  Data

Precious Metals Alkaline Cleaning     732
  Spent Baths
                           XII

-------
                   LIST OF TABLES (Continued)
Table


V-109


V-110


V-lll



V-112


V-113



V-114


V-115


V-116



V-117


V-118;



V-119


V-120



V-121


V-122


V-123
Title                                Page
Precious Metals Alkaline Cleaning     733
  Rinse                          '

Precious Metals Alkaline Cleaning     734
  Prebonding Wastewater

Precious Metals Alkaline Cleaning     735
  Prebonding Wastewater Raw
  Wastewater Sampling Data
   ;	I        •
Precious Metals Tumbling or           740
  Burnishing Wastewater   • •

Precious Metals Tumbling or           741
  Burnishing Wastewater Raw
  Wastewater Sampling Data
             !
Precious Metals Sawing or Grinding    745
  Spent Neat Oils
             !
Precious Metals Sawing or Grinding    746
  Spent Emulsions
Precious Metals Sawing or Grinding    747
  Spent Emulsions Raw Wastewater
  Sampling Data

Precious Metals Pressure Bonding      750
  Contact Cooking Water

Precious Metals Pressure Bonding      751
  Contact Cooling Water Raw
  Wastewater Sampling Data

Precious Metals Wet Air Pollution     754
  Control Slowdown

Refractory Metals Rolling Spent       755
  Neat Oils and Graphite-Based
  Lubricants
              i
Refractory Metals Rolling Spent       756
  Emulsions   \
    '          \
Refractory Metals Drawing Spent       757
  Lubricants  |
Refractory Metals Extrusion Spent     758
  Lubricants  '
                           Xlll

-------
Table
LIST OF TABLES (Continued)

  Title
Page
V-124


V-125



V-126


V-127


V-128


V-129


V-130


V-131


V-132



V-133


V-134


V-135


V-136



V-137


V-138

V-139
   Refractory Metals Extrusion Press     759
     Hydraulic Fluid Leakage

   Refractory Metals Extrusion Press     760
     Hydraulic Fluid Leakage Raw
     Wastewater Sampling Data

   Refractory Metals Forging Spent       762
     Lubricants

   Refractory Metals Forging Contact     763
     Cooling Water

   Refractory Metals Metal Powder        764
     Production Wastewater

   Refractory Metals Metal Powder        765
     Production Floor Wash Wastewater

   Refractory Metals Metal Powder        766
     Pressing Spent Lubricants

   Refractory Metals Surface Treatment   767
     Spent Baths

   Refractory Metals Surface Treatment   768
     Spent Baths Raw Wastewater
     Sampling Data

   Refractory Metals Surface Treatment   771
     Rinse

   Refractory Metals Surface Treatment   772
     Rinse Raw Wastewater Sampling Data

   Refractory Metals Alkaline Cleaning   778
     Spent Baths

   Refractory Metals Alkaline Cleaning   779
     Spent Baths Raw Wastewater Sampling
     Data

   Refractory Metals Alkaline Cleaning   781
     Rinse

   Refractory Metals Molten Salt Rinse   782

   Refractory Metals Molten Salt Rinse   783
     Raw Wastewater Sampling Data
                            xiv

-------
                   LIST OF TABLES (Continued)
Table
  Title
Page
.V-140


V-141



V-142


V-143


V-144"



V-145


V-146



V-147


V-148


V-149



V-150


V-151



V-152 ;


V-153
Refractory Metals Tumbling or         789
  Burnishing Wastewater

Refractory Metals Tumbling or         790
  Burnishing Wastewater Raw
  Wastewater Sampling Data

Refractory Metals Sawing or Grinding  796
  Spent Neat Oils
             i
Refractory Metals Sawing or Grinding  797
  Spent Emulsions

Refractory Metals Sawing or Grinding  798
  Spent Emulsions Raw Wastewater
  Sampling Data

Refractory Metals Sawing or Grinding  800
  Contact Cooling Water
             i- - -
Refractory Metals Sawing or Grinding  801
  Contact Cooling Water Raw
  Wastewater Sampling Data
           ' ' f         :"         '
Refractory Metals Sawing or Grinding  805
  Rinse
Refractory Metals Dye Penetrant       806
  Testing Wastewater
              i
Refractory Metals Dye Penetrant       807
  Testing Wastewater Raw
  Wastewater Sampling Data
              i
Refractory Metals Equipment Cleaning  810
  Wastewater
Refractory Metals Equipment Cleaning  811
  Wastewater Raw Wastewater Sampling
  Data        |
              i
Refractory Metals Miscellaneous       813
  Wastewater Sources
              i •   . •
Refractory Metals Wet Air Pollution   814
  Control Slowdown
                            xv

-------
                   LIST OF TABLES  (Continued)
Table
   Title
Page
V-154



V-155

V-156


V-157

V-158

V-159

V-160


V-161



V-162

V-163


V-164


V-165


V-166


V-167



V-168


V-169



V-170
Refractory Metals Wet Air Pollution   815
  Control Slowdown Raw Wastewater
  Sampling Data

Titanium Rolling Spent Neat Oils      819

Titanium Rolling Contact Cooling      820
  Water

Titanium Drawing Spent Neat Oils      821

Titanium Extrusion Spent Neat Oils    822

Titanium Extrusion Spent Emulsions    823

Titanium Extrusion Press Hydraulic    824
  Fluid Leakage

Titanium Extrusion Press Hydraulic    825
  Fluid Leakage Raw Wastewater
  Sampling Data

Titanium Forging Spent Lubricants     826

Titanium Forging Contact Cooling      827
  Water

Titanium Forging Equipment Cleaning   828
  Wastewater

Titanium Forging Press Hydraulic      829
  Fluid Leakage

Titanium Tube Reducing Spent          830
  Lubricants

Titanium Tube Reducing Spent •  .       831
  Lubricants Raw Wastewater
  Sampling. Data

Titanium Heat Treatment Contact.       832
  Cooling Water ..

Titanium Heat Treatment Contact       833
  Cooling Water Raw Wastewater
  Sampling Data

Titanium Surface Treatment Spent      836
  Baths
                            xvi

-------
                   LIST OF TABLES  (Continued)
V-172

V-173


V-174


V-175



V-176

V-177


V-178

V-179

V-180


V-181


V-182


V-183



V-184


V-185



V-186
   Title            .    '             Page


Titanium Surface Treatment Spent      837
  Baths Raw Wastewater Sampling
  Data

Titanium Surface Treatment Rinse      841

Titanium 'Surface Treatment Rinse      842
  Raw Wastewater Sampling Data

Titanium Alkaline Cleaning Spent      847
  Baths

Titanium Alkaline Cleaning Spent      848
  Baths Raw. Wastewater Sampling
  Data        !
  .'.••.'    i
Titanium Alkaline Cleaning Rinse      850

Titanium Alkaline Cleaning Rinse      851
  Raw Wastewater Sampling Data

Titanium Molten Salt Rinse            853

Titanium Tumbling Wastewater          854
              i-
Titanium Tumbling Wastewater Raw      855
  Wastewater  Sampling Data
Titanium Sawing or Grinding Spent     858
  Neat Oils .  j
              i     . '
Titanium Sawing or Grinding Spent     859
  Emulsions
Titanium Sawing or Grinding Spent     860
  Emulsions Raw Wastewater Sampling
  Data
•.-•••'-  •.•"•'.. '.i' ••'.,  •     -  •    '
Titeinium Sawing or Grinding Contact   865
  Cooling Water
              i
Titanium Sawing or Grinding Contact   866
  Cooling Water Raw Wastewater
  Satmpling Data
 *            , !
              |     .
Titanium Dye Eenetrant Testing        867
  Wastewater
                          ; xvi i

-------
                   LIST OP TABLES (Continued)
Table
 Title
Paqe
V-187

V-188


V-189



V-190

V-191


V-192

V-193


V-194



V-195


V-196



V-197

V-198


V-199


V-200



V-201


V-202

V-213
Titanium Hydrotesting Wastewater      868

Titanium Wet Air Pollution Control    869
  Slowdown

Titanium Wet Air Pollution Control    870
  Slowdown Raw Wastewater Sampling
  Data

Uranium Extrusion Spent Lubricants    873

Uranium Extrusion Tool Contact        874
  Cooling Water

Uranium Forging Spent Lubricants      875

Uranium Heat Treatment Contact        876
  Cooling Water

Uranium Heat Treatment Contact        877
  Cooling Water Raw Wastewater
  Sampling Data

Uranium Surface Treatment Spent       884
  Baths

Uranium Surface Treatment Spent       885
  Baths Raw Wastewater Sampling
  Data

Uranium Surface Treatment Rinse       888

Uranium Surface Treatment Rinse       889
  Raw Wastewater Sampling Data

Uranium Sawing or Grinding Spent      894
  Emulsions

Uranium Sawing or Grinding Spent      895
  Emulsions Raw Wastewater
  Sampling Data

Uranium Sawing or Grinding Contact    898
  Cooling Water

Uranium Sawing or Grinding Rinse      899

Uranium Area Cleaning Washwater       900
                            xvi 11

-------
                   LIST OF TABLES (Continued)
Table
   Title
Paqe
V-204


V-205


V-206




V-207

V-208


V-209

V-210


V-211

V-212

V-213


V-214

V-215


V-216


V-217


V-218


V-219

V-220
Uranium Area Cleaning Washwater       901
  Raw Wastewater Sampling Data

Uranium Wet Air Pollution Control     908
  Blowdown

Uranium Wet Air Pollution Control     909
  Blowdown Raw Wastewater Sampling
  Data       :

Uranium Drum Washwater                911
             i
             t
Uranium Drum ^ashwater Raw            913
  Wastewater ;Sampling Data

Urainium Launcjry Washwater             917
             I
            .- i .
Uranium Laundry Washwater Raw         918
 . Wastewater ^Sampling Data
             I                        :
Zinc Rolling Spent Neat Oils          921
        '•-•!'
Zinc Rolling ,Spent Emulsions          922
            - !  - '
Zinc Rolling Contact Cooling          923
  Water      j
             i.    '
Zinc Drawing Spent Emulsions          924
Zinc Direct Chill Casting             925
  Contact Coojling Water

Zinc Stationary Casting Contact       926
  Cooling Water

Zinc Heat Treatment Contact           927
  Cooling Water

Zinc Surface Treatment Spent          928
  Baths      .

Zinc Surface Treatment Rinse          929
Zinc Surface Treatment Rinse          930
  Raw Wastewater Sampling
  Data       ;
                             xix

-------
                   LIST OF TABLES  (Continued)
Table
Title
.  Page
V-221


V-222

V-223


V-224


V-225

V-226


V-221


V-228


V-229


V-230



V-231


V-232


V-233


V-234



V-235


V-236
Zinc Alkaline Cleaning Spent          935
  Baths

Zinc Alkaline Cleaning Rinse          936

Zinc Alkaline Cleaning Rinse          937
  Raw Wastewater Sampling Data

Zinc Sawing or Grinding Spent         942
  Emulsions

Zinc Electrocoating Rinse             943

Zirconium-Hafnium Rolling Spent       944
  Neat Oils

Zirconium-Hafnium Drawing Spent       945
  Lubricants

Zirconium-Hafnium Extrusion Spent     946
  Lubricants

Zirconium-Hafnium Extrusion Press     947
  Hydraulic Fluid Leakage

Zirconium-Hafnium Extrusion Press     948
  Hydraulic Fluid Leakage Raw
  Wastewater Sampling Data

Zirconium-Hafnium Swaging Spent       949
  Neat Oils

Zirconium-Hafnium Tube Reducing       950
  Spent Lubricants

Zirconium-Hafnium Heat Treatment      951
  Contact Cooling Water

Zirconium-Hafnium.Heat Treatment      952
  Contact Cooling Water Raw
  Wastewater Sampling Data

Zirconium-Hafnium Surface Treatment   955
  Spent Baths

Zirconium-Hafnium Surface Treaitment   956
  Spent Baths Raw Wastewater
  Sampling Data
                            xx

-------
                   LIST OF TABLES (Continued)
Table
Title
Page
V-237


V-238


V-239


V-240

V-241


V-242


V-243


V-244


V-245


V-246



V-247


V-248

V-249


V-250


V-251



V-252
  Zirconium-Hafnium Surface Treatment   962
    Rinse  .

  Zirconium-Hafnium Alkaline Cleaning   963
    Spent Baths

  Zirconium-Hafnium Alkaline Cleaning   964
  .  Rinse       :               .

  Zirconium-Hafnium Molten Salt Rinse   965
   :  " '          i
  Zirconium-Hafnium Sawing or Grinding  966
    Spent Neat Qils
                i
  Zirconium-Hafnium Sawing or Grinding  967
    Spent Emulsions
  Zirconium-Hafnium Sawing or Grinding  968
    Contact Cooling Water

  Zirconium-Hafnium Sawing or Grinding  969
    Rinse
               ' [
     -          , I
  Zirconium-Hafnium Inspection and      970
   . Testing Wastewater
                I • •
  Zirconium-Hafnium Inspection and      971
    Testing Wastewater Raw Wastewater
    Sampling Data
  Zirconium-Hafnium Degreasing Spent    974
  .  Solvents    ,
            '  :  \
  Zirconium-Hafnium Degreasing Rinse    975

  Zirconium-Hafnium Wet Air Pollution   976
    Control Slowdown

  Metal Powders Metal Powder Production 977
    Atomization Wastewater

  Metal Powders Metal Powder Production 978
    Atomization Wastewater Raw
    Wastewater Sampling Data
                 i'
  Metal Powders Tumbling, Burnishing or 980
    Cleaning Wastewater
                            xxi

-------
                   LIST OP TABLES (Continued)
Table
 Title
Page
V-253



V-254


V-255


V-256



V-257


V-258



V-259


V-260

V-261


V-262



V-263


V-264


V-265



V-266
Metal Powders Tumbling, Burnishing or 982
  Cleaning Wastewater Raw Wastewater
  Sampling Data

Metal Powders Sawing or Grinding      987
  Spent Neat Oils

Metal Powders Sawing or Grinding      988
  Spent Emulsions

Metal Powders Sawing or Grinding      989
  Spent Emulsions Raw Wastewater
  Sampling Data

Metal Powders Sawing or Grinding      993
  Contact Cooling Water

Metal Powders Sawing or Grinding      994
  Contact Cooling Water Raw
  Wastewater Sampling Data

Metal Powders Sizing Spent Neat  '     995
  Oils

Metal Powders Sizing Spent Emulsions  996

Metal Powders Steam Treatment Wet     997
  Air Pollution Control Blowdown

Metal Powders Steam Treatment Wet     998
  Air Pollution Control Blowdown
  Raw Wastewater Sampling Data

Metal Powders Oil-Resin              1001
  Impregnation Spent Neat Oils

Metal Powders Hot Pressing Contact   1002
  Cooling Water

Metal Powders Hot Pressing Contact   1003
  Cooling Water Raw Wastewater
  Sampling Data

Metal Powders Mixing Wet Air         1004
  Pollution Control Blowdown
                            xxn

-------
                   LIST OF TABLES  ; (Continued)
Table
Title
Paqe
V-267



V-268


V-269


V-270


V-271


V-272


V-273


V-274


V-275


V-276


V-277


V-278


V-279


V-280


V-281


V-282
Metal Powders Mixing Wet Air         1005
  Pollution Control Slowdown
  Raw Wastewater Sampling Data

Wastewater Treatment Performance     1006
  Data - Plant A

Wastewater Treatment Performance     1009
  Data - Plant B

Wastewater Treatment Performance     1013
  Data - Plant D

Wastewater Treatment Performance     1017
  Data - Plant E

Wastewater Treatment Performance     1025
  Data - Plant F

Wastewater Treatment Performance     1032
  Data - Plant I

Wastewater Treatment Performance     1038
  Data - Planjb J

Wastewater Treatment Performance     1041
  Data - Plant M
             I                   !      • '
Wastewater Treatment Performance     1051
  Data - Plant Q
             i  •
            - i          -
Wastewater Treatment Performance     10'60
  Data - Plant R
             I  - '.  .
Wastewater Treatment Performance     1062
  Data - Plant S

Wastewater Treatment Performance,     1064
  Delta - Plant T
Wastewater Treatment Performance     1065
  Data - Plant U
Wastewater Treatment Performance     1072
  Data - Plant V

Wastewater Treatment Performance     1080
  Data - Plant W
                          xxi 11

-------An error occurred while trying to OCR this image.

-------
                   •LIST OF TABLES  (Continued)
Tables
Title
Page
VII-1


Vli-2


VII-3


VII-4



VII-5



VIII-6


VII-7

VII-8,

VII-9

VII-10


VII-11

VI1-12

VII-13

VII-14


VII-15


VII-16


VI1-17
pH Control Effect on Metals          1400
  Removal    '             .

Effectiveness of Sodium Hydroxide    1400
  for Metals Removal                    .

Effectiveness of Lime and Sodium-     1401
  Hydroxide for Metals Removal

Theoretical Solubilities of          1401
  Hydroxides and Sulfide of
  Selected Metals in Pure Water

Sampling Data From Sulfide           1402
  Precipitation-Sedimentation
  Systems

Sulfide Precipitation-Sedimentation  1403
  Performance

Ferrite Co-Precipitation Performance 1404

Concentration of Total Cyanide       1404

Multimedia Filter Performance        1405

Performance of Selected Settling     1405
  Systems    ;

Skimming Performance                 1406

Selected Partition Coefficients      1407

Trace Organic Removal by Skimming    1408

Combined Metals Data Effluent        1408
  Values  '   '

L & S Performance Additional         1409
 1 Pollutants '.  ' '

Combined Metals Data Set -           1409
  Untreated Wastewater

Maximum Pollutant Level in           1410
  Untreated Wastewater Additional
  Pollutants
                         xxv

-------
                   LIST OP TABLES  (Continued)
Table
  Title
Paqe
VII-18


VII-19


VII-2Q


VII-21

VII-22



VII-23


VII-24


VII-25


VII-26

VII-27


VII-28

VII-29

VII-30


VIII-1



VIII-2



VIII-3
Precipitation-Settling-Filtration    1411
  (LS&F) Performance Plant A

Precipitation-Settling-Filtration    1412
  (LS&F) Performance Plant B

Precipitation-Settling-Filtration    1413
  (LS&F) Performance Plant C

Summary of Treatment Effectiveness   1414

Summary of Treatment Effectiveness   1415
  for Selected Nonconventional
  Pollutants

Treatability Rating of Priority      1416
  Pollutants

Classes of Organic Compounds         1417
  Adsorbed on Carbon                   ;

Activated Carbon Performance         1418
  (Mercury)

Ion Exchange Performance             1418

Membrane Filtration System           1419
  Effluent

Peat Adsorption Performance          1419

Ultrafiltration Performance          1420

Chemical Emulsion Breaking           1421
  Efficiencies

BPT Costs of Compliance for          1508
  the Nonferrous Metals
  Forming Category

BAT Costs of Compliance for the      1509
  Nonferrous Metals Forming
  Category

PSES Costs of Compliance for the     1510
  Nonferrous Metals Forming
  Category
                           xxvi

-------
                    LIST OF TABLES (Continued)
 Table
  Title
Paqe
 VIII-'4



 VIII-5


 VIII-6


 VIII-7


 •VIII-8


 VIII-9

 VIII-10

 VIII-11


 VI11-12


-VIII-13


 VIII-14

 VIII-15


 VI11-16


 IX-1



 IX-2
Nonferrous Metals Forming Category   1511
  Cost Equations for Recommended
  Treatment and Control Technologies

Components of Total Capital          1518
  Investment

Components of Total Annualized       1519
  Investment

Wastewater Sampling Frequency        1520
Pollutant Parameter Important to     1521
  Treatment System Design

Sludge to Influent Flow Ratios       1522

Key to Cost Curves and Equations     1523

Cost Equations Used in Cost Curve    1524
  Method

Number of Plants for Which Costs     1525
  Wejre Scaled 'From Similar Plants

Flow Reduction Recycle Ratio and     1526
  Association Cost Assumptions

Segregation Cost Basis               1528

Nonferrous Metals Forming Solid      1529
  Waste Generation

Nonferrous Metals Forming Energy     1530
  Consumption

Potential Preliminary Treatment      1626
  Requirements Lead-Tin-Bismuth
  Forming Subcategory

Potential Preliminary Treatment      1627
  Requirements Magnesium Forming
  Subcategory
                          xxvii

-------
                   LIST OF TABLES (Continued)
Table
 Title
Pac
IX-3



IX-4



IX-5



IX-6



IX-7



IX-8



IX-9



IX-10



IX-11



IX-12


IX-13



IX-14
Potential Preliminary Treatment      1628
  Requirements Nickel-Cobalt  .
  Forming Subcategory

Potential Preliminary Treatment      1630
  Requirements Precious Metals
  Forming Subcategory

Potential Preliminary Treatment      1631
  Requirements Refractory Metals
  Forming Subcategory

Potential Preliminary Treatment      1633
  Requirements Titanium Forming
  Subcategory

Potential Preliminary Treatment      1635
  Requirements Uranium Forming
  Subcategory

Potential Preliminary Treatment      1636
  Requirements Zinc Forming
  Subcategory

Potential Preliminary Treatment      1637
  Requirements Zirconium-Hafnium
  Forming Subcategory

Potential Preliminary Treatment      1638
  Requirements Metal Powders
  Subcategory

BPT Regulatory Flows for Production  1639
  Operations - Lead-Tin-Bismuth
  Forming Subcategory

Lead-Tin-Bismuth Forming Subcategory 1641
  BPT Effluent Limitations

BPT Regulatory Flows for Production  1648
  Operations - Magnesium Forming
  Subcategory

Magnesium Forming Subcategory BPT    1649
  Effluent Limitations
                               xxvui

-------
                   LIST OF TABLES  (Continued)
Table
Title
Paqe
IX-15



IX-16


IX-17



IX-18


IX-19



IX-20


IX-21



IX-22


IX-23


IX-2 4


IX-2 5



IX-26


IX-27



IX-28
BPT; Regulatory Flows for Production  1653
  Operations - Nickel-Cobalt
  Forming Subcategory

Nickel-Cobalt Forming Subcategory    1656
  BPT Effluent Limitations

BPT Regulatory Flows for Production  1670
  Operations i- Precious Metals
  •Forming Subcategory

Precious Metals Forming Subcategory  1672
  BPT Effluent Limitations

BPT Regulatory Flows for Production  1682
  Operations - Refractory Metals
  Forming Subcategory

Refractory Metals Forming Subcate-   168'4
  gory BPT Effluent Limitations

BPT Regulatory Flows for Production  1701
  Operations '- Titanium Forming
  Subcategory

Titanium Forming Subcategory BPT     1703
  Effluent Limitations

BPT Regulatory Flows for Production  1715
  Operations - Uranium Forming

Uranium Forming Subcategory BPT      1717
  Effluent Limitations

BPT Regulatory Flows for Production  1724
  Operations - Zinc Forming
  .Subcategory

Zinc Forming Subcategory BPT         1725
  Effluent Limitations

BPT Regulatory Flows for Production  1731
  Operations - Zirconium-Hafnium
  Forming Subcategory

Zirconium-Hafnium Forming Subcate-   1733
  gory BPT Effluent Limitations
                             xxix

-------
                   LIST OF TABLES  (Continued)
Table
Title
Pac
IX-29



IX-30


IX-31



IX-32




IX-33
BPT Regulatory Flows for Production  1741
  Operations - Metal Powders
  Subcategory

Metal Powders Subcategory BPT        1742
  Effluent Limitations

Allowable Discharge Calculations for 1748
  Refractory Metals Forming Plant X
  in Example 1 (Nickel)

Allowable Discharge Calculations for 1749
  Lead-Tin-Bismuth Forming Plant Y
  in Example 2 (Total Suspended
  Solids)

Allowable Discharge Calculations for 1751
  Nickel-Cobalt and Titanium Forming
  Plant Z in Example 3 (Nickel)
IX-34



X-l


X-2


X-3




X-4




X-5
Allowable Discharge Calculations for 1753
  Nickel-Cobalt and Titanium Forming
  Plant Z in Example 3 (Cyanide)

Capital and Annual Cost Estimates    1794
  for BAT (PSES) Total Subcategory

Capital and Annual Cost Estimates    1795
  for BAT Direct Dischargers

Nonferrous Metals Forming Pollutant  1796
  Reduction Benefit Estimates Lead-
  Tin-Bismuth Forming Subcategory
  Total Subcategory

Nonferrous Metals Forming Pollutant  1797
  Reduction Benefit Estimates
  Magnesium Forming Subcategory
  Total Subcategory

Nonferrous Metals Forming Pollutant  1798
  Reduction Benefit Estimates
  Nickel-Cobalt Forming Subcategory
  Total Subcategory
                          XXX

-------
                   LIST OF TABLES (Continued)
Table
Title
X-6
X-7
X-8
X-9
X-10
X-ll
X-12
X-13
X-14
Npnferrous Metals Forming Pollutant   1799
  Reduction Benefit Estimates Precious
•  Metals Forming Subcategory Total
  Subcategory

Nonferrous Metals Forming Pollutant   1800
  Reduction Benefit Estimates
  Refractory Metals Forming
  Subcategory Total Subcategory

Nonferrous Metals Forming Pollutant   1801
  Reduction Benefit Estimates
  Titanium Forming Subcategory Total
  Subcategory

Nonferrous Metals Forming Pollutant   1802
  Reduction Benefit Estimates
  Uranium Forming Subcategory Total
  Subcategory

Nonferrous Metals Forming Pollutant   1803
  Reduction Benefit Estimates Zinc
  Forming Subcategory Total
  Subcategory

Nonferrous Metals Forming Pollutant   1804
  Reduction Benefit Estimates
  Zirconium-Hafnium Forming
  Subcategory Total Subcategory

Nonferrous Metals Forming Pollutant   18.05
  Reduction Benefit Estimates Metal
  Powders Subcategory Total
  Subcategory

Nonferrous Metals Forming Pollutant   1806
  Reduction Benefit Estimates Lead-
  Tin-Bismuth Forming Subcategory
  Direct Dischargers

Nonferrous Metals Forming Pollutant   1807
  Reduction Benefit Estimates
  Magnesium Forming Subcategory
  Direct Dischargers
                           xxxi

-------
                   LIST OF TABLES  (Continued)
Table
 Title
X-15




X-16




X-17




X-18




X-19




X-20



X-21



X-22



X-23


X-24
Nonferrous Metals Forming Pollutant  1808
  Reduction Benefit Estimates Nickel-
  Cobalt Forming Subcategory Direct
  Dischargers

Nonferrous Metals Forming Pollutant  1809
  Reduction Benefit Estimate's
  Precious Metals Forming Subcategory
  Direct Dischargers  .

Nonferrous Metals Forming Pollutant  1810
 . Reduction Benefit Estimates
  Refractory Metals Forming
  Subcategory Direct Dischargers

Nonferrous Metals Forming Pollutant  1811
  Reduction Benefit Estimates
  Titanium Forming Subcategory
  Direct Dischargers

Nonferrous Metals Forming Pollutant  1812
  Reduction Benefit Estimates Uranium   :
  Forming Subcategory Direct
  Dischargers
Nonferrous Metals Forming Pollutant
  Reduction Benefit Estimates Zinc
  Forming Subcategory
1813
Nonferrous Metals Forming Pollutant  1814
  Reduction Estimates Zirconium-
  Hafnium Forming Direct Dischargers

Nonferrous Metals Forming Pollutant  1815
  Reduction Estimates Metal Powders
  Subcategory Direct Dischargers

Options Selected as the Technology   1816
  Basis for BAT

BAT Regulatory Flows for 'the Produc- 1817
  tion Operations - Lead-Tin-Bismuth
  Forming Subcategory
                           xxx 11

-------
                   LIST 0-F TABLES (Continued)
Table-
 Title
Pac
X-.25


X-26



X-27


X-28



X-29


X-30



X-31


X-32



X-33


X-34



X-35


X-36
Lead-Tin-Bismuth Forming Subcategory  1819
  BAT Effluent Limitations

BAT Regulatory Flows  for'the Produc-  1824
  tion Operations - Magnesium Forming
  Subcategory

Magnesium Forming Subcategory BAT     1825
  Effluent Limitations

BAT Regulatory Flows'  for the Produc-  1829
  tion Operations - Nickel-Cobalt
  Forming Subcategory

,Nickel-Cobalt Forming Subcategory     1832
  BAT Effluent Limitations

BAT Regulatory Flows  for the          1845
  Production Operations - Precious
    Metal Forming Subcategory

Precious Metals Forming Subcategory   1847
  EiAT Effluent Limitations

BAT Regulatory. Flows  for the          1856
  Production Operations - Refractory
  Metals Forming Subcategory

Refractory Metals Forming Subcate-    1858
  gory BAT Effluent Limitations

BAT Regulatory Flows  for the          1869
  Production Operations -
  Titanium Forming Subcategory

Titanium Forming Subcategory BAT      1871
  Effluent Limitations

BAT Regulatory Flows  for the          1882
  Production Operations - Uranium
  Forming Subcategory
                         xxxi11


-------
                   LIST OF TABLES (Continued)
Table
Title
Page
X-37


X-38



X-39


X-40




X-41



X-42



X-43


XI-1


XI-2


XI-3


XI-4


XI-5


XI-6


XI-7
Uranium Forming Subcategory BAT
  Effluent Limitations

BAT Regulatory Flows for the
  Production Operations - Zinc
  Forming Subcategory

Zinc Forming Subcategory BAT
  Effluent Limitations

BAT Regulatory Flows for the
  Production Operations -
  Zirconium-Hafnium Forming
  Subcategory

Zirconium-Hafnium Forming
  Subcategory BAT Effluent
  Limitations

BAT Regulatory Flows for the
  Production Operations - Metal
  Powders Subcategory

Metal Powders Subcategory BAT
  Effluent Limitations

Options Selected as the Bases
  for NSPS
1884


1889



1890


1896




1898



1906



1907


1919
Lead-Tin-Bismuth Forming Subcategory 1920
  New Source Performance Standards      :
Magnesium Forming Subcategory New
  Source Performance Standards
1927
Nickel-Cobalt Forming Subcategory    1931
  New Source Performance Standards

Precious Metals Forming Subcategory  1946
  New Source Performance Standards

Refractory Metals Forming Subcate-   1956
  gory New Source Performance Standards
Titanium Forming Subcategory New
  Source Performance Standards
1973
                            XXXIV

-------
                   LIST OF TABLES (Continued)
Table
Title
XI-8


XI-9


XI-10


XI-11


XII-1



XII-2



XII-3



XI1-4



XII-5




XII-6




XI1-7
Uranium Forming Subcategory New
  Source Performance Standards

Zinc Forming Subcategory New
  Source Performance Standards
1986
1993
Zirconium-Hafnium Forming Subcate-   1999
  gory New Source Performance Standards

Metal Powders Subcategory New Source 2006
  Performance! Standards

POTW Removals of the Toxic Pollu-    2019
  tants Found in Nonferrous Metals
  Forming Wastewater

Pollutant Removal Percentages for   . 2021
  BAT or PSES Model Technology By
  Subcategory

Option Selected as the Model         2022
  Technology:Basis for PSES and
  PSNS

Capital and Annual Cost Estimates    2023
  for PSES Options Indirect
  Dischargers

Nonferrous Metals Forming Pollutant  2025
  Reduction Benefit Estimates Lead-
  Tin-Bismuth Forming Subcategory
  Indirect Dischargers

Nonferrous Metals Forming Pollutant  2026
 • Reduction Benefit Estimates Magnesium
  Forming Subcategory Indirect
  Dischargers

Nonferrous Metals Forming Pollutant  2027
  Reduction Benefit Estimates Nickel^
  Cobalt Forming Subcategory Indirect
  Dischargers
                          XXXV

-------
                   LIST OF TABLES  (Continued)
Table
 Title
XII-8
XII-9
XII-10
XII-11
XII-12
XII-13
XII-14
XII-15
XII-16
XII-17
Nonferrous Metals Forming Pollutant  2028
  Reduction Benefit Estimates Precious
  Metals Forming Subcategory Indirect
  Dischargers

Nonferrc-us Metals Forming Pollutant  2029
  Reduction Benefit Estimates Refractory
  Metals Forming Subcategory Indirect
  Dischargers

Nonferrous Metals Forming Pollutant  2030
  Reduction Benefit Estimates Titanium
  Forming Subcategory Indirect
  Dischargers

Nonferrous Metals Forming Pollutant  2031
  Reduction Benefit Estimates
  Zirconium-Hafnium Forming Subcategory
  Indirect Dischargers

Nonferrous Metals Forming Pollutant  2032
  Reduction Benefit Estimates Metal
  Powders Subcategory Indirect
 • Dischargers

Lead-Tin-Bismuth Forming Subcategory 2033
  Pretreatment Standards for
  Existing Sources

Magnesium Forming Subcategory        2038
  Pretreatment Standards for
  Existing Sources

Nickel-Cobalt Forming Subcategory    2042
  Pretreatment Standards for
  Existing Sources

Precious Metals Forming Subcategory  2055
  Pretreatment Standards for
  Existing Sources

Refractory Metals Forming Subcate-   2064
  gory Pretreatment Standards for
  Existing Sources
                          xxxvi

-------
                   LIST OF TABLES '(Continued)
Table
 Title
Page
XII-18



XII-19



XII-20'


XII-21



XII-22
Titanium Forming Subcategory
  Pretreatment Standards for
  Existing Sources

Uranium Forming Subcategory
  Pretreatment Standards for
  Existing Sources
2075
2085
Zinc Forming Subcategory Pretreat-   2091
  ment Standards for Existing Sources

Zirconium-Hafnium Forming Subcate-   2097
  gory Pretreatment Standards for
  Existing Sources

Metal Powders Subcategory Pretreat-  2105
  ment Standards for Existing Sources
XII-23
XII-24
XII-25
XII-26
XII-27
XII-28
Lead-Tin-Bismuth Forming Subcategory 2110
  Pretreatment Standards for
  ,New Sources.

Magnesium Forming Subcategory        2115
  Pretreatment Standards for New
  Sources

Nickel-Cobalt Forming Subcategory    2119
  Pretreatment Standards for
  New Sources

Precious Metals Forming Subcategory  2132
  Pretreatment Standards for
  ,New Sources

Refractory Metals Forming Subcate-   2141
  gory Pretreatment Standards for
  New Sources

Titanium Forming Subcategory         2152
  Pretreatment Standards for
  New Sources
                          xxxvn

-------
                   LIST OF TABLES (Continued)
Table
Title
Paqe
XII-29



XII-30


XII-31



XII-32
Uranium Forming Subcategory
  Pretreatment Standards for
  New Sources
2162
Zinc Forming Subcategory Pretreat-   2168
  ment Standards for New Sources        ,

Zirconium-Hafnium Forming Subcate-   2174
  gory Pretreatment Standards for New
  Sources

Metal Powders Subcategory Pretreat-  2182
  ment Standards for New Sources
                         xxxv111

-------
                         LIST OF FIGURES
Figure

III-l


III-2


111-3

III-4

III-5

III-6

111-7

111-8

111-9

111-10

I11-11

II1-12

111-13

111-14

111-15-

111-16

111-17

111-18

111-19

111-20

II1-21

111-22

111-23

111-24
 Title                                   Page

Geographical Distribution of Nonferrous   360
  Forming Plants

Sequence1 of Nonferrous Metals Forming     361
  Operations

Common Rolling Mill Configurations        362

Reversing Hot Strip Mill                  363

4-High Cold Rolling Mill                  364
                  [
Tube Drawing                              365

Hydraulic Draw Bench                      366

Direct Extrusion                          367

Extrusion Press                           368

Extrusion Tooling and Setup               369

Forging                                   370

Ring Rolling                              371

Impacting                                 372

Some Clcid Configurations                  373

Atomization                               374

Powder Metallurgy Die Compaction          375

Direct Chill Casting                      376

Direct Chill (D.C.) Casting Unit          377

Continuous Sheet Casting                  378

Continuous Strip Casting                  379

Shot Casting                              .380

Roller Hearth Annealing Furnace           381

Bulk Pickling Tank                        382

Continuous Pickling Line                  383
                              xxx ix

-------
Figure



111-25



V-l



V-2



V-3



V-4



V-5



V-6



V-7



V-8



V-9



V-10



V-ll



V-l 2



V-l 3



V-l 4



V-15



V-16



V-17



V-18



V-l 9



V-20



V-21
     LIST OF FIGURES  (Continued)



Title



Vapor Degreaser



Wastewater Sources at Plant A



Wastewater Sources at Plant B



Wastewater Sources at Plant C



Wastewater Sources at Plant D



Wastewater Sources at Plant E



Wastewater Sources at Plant F



Wastewater Sources at Plant G'



Wastewater Sources at Plant I



Wastewater Sources at Plant J



Wastewater Sources at Plant K



Wastewater Sources at Plant L



Wastewater Sources at Plant M



Wastewater Sources at Plant N



Wastewater Sources at Plant O



Wastewater Sources at Plant P



Wastewater Sources at Plant Q



Wastewater Sources at Plant R



Wastewater Sources at Plant S



Wastewater Sources at Plant T



Wastewater Sources at Plant V



Wastewater Sources at Plant Z
Page



 384



1098



1099



1100



1101



1102



1103



1104



1105



1106



1107



1108



1109



1110



1111



1112



1113



1114



1115



1116



1117



1118
                               xl

-------
                   LIST OF FIGURES (Continued)
Figure

VII-1



VII-2

VII-3


VII-4


VII-5


VII-6


VII-7


VII-8.


VII-9


VII-10


VI.I-11


VII-12


VII-13


VII-14

VII-15

VII-16

VII-17

VII-18
Title    ;          ;                     Page

Comparative Solubilities of Metal       1422
  Hydroxides and Sulfide as a
  Function of pH

Lead Solubility in Three Alkalies       1423

Effluent Zinc Concentrations vs.        1424
  Minimum Effluent pH

Hydroxide Precipitation Sedimentation   1425
  Effectiveness - Cadmium

Hydroxide Precipitation Sedimentation   1426
  Effectiveness - Chromium

Hydroxide; Precipitation Sedimentation   .1427
  Effectiveness - Copper

Hydroxide Precipitation Sedimentation   1428
  Effectiveness - Lead

Hydroxide Precipitation Sedimentation   1429
  Effectiveness - Nickel and Aluminum

Hydroxide Precipitation Sedimentation   1430
  Effectiveness - Zinc

Hydroxides Precipitation Sedimentation   1431
  Effectiveness - Iron

Hydroxide Precipitation Sedimentation   1432
  Effectiveness - Manganese

Hydroxide Precipitation Sedimentation   1433
  Effectiveness - TSS

Hexavalent Chromium Reduction with      1434
  Sulfur Dioxide

Granular Bed Filtration                 1435

Pressure Filtration                     1436

Representative Types of Sedimentation   1437

Activated Carbon Adsorption Column      1438

Centrifugation                          1439
                               xli

-------
  LIST OF FIGURES (Continued)
Figure
VII-19
VII-20
VII-21
VII-22
VII-23
VII-24
VII-25
VII-26
VII-27
VII-28
VII-29
VII-30
VII-31
VII-32
VII-33
VII-34
VII-35
VII-36
VII-37
VII-38
Title
Treatment of Cyanide Waste by Alkaline
Chlorination
Typical Ozone Plant for Waste Treatment
UV/Ozonation
Types of Evaporation Equipment
Dissolved Air Flotation
Gravity Thickening
Ion Exchange with Regeneration
Simplified Reverse Osmosis Schematic
Reverse Osmosis Membrane Configurations
Sludge Drying Bed
Simplified Ultraf iltration Flow
Schematic
Vacuum Filtration
Flow Diagram for Emulsion Breaking with
Chemicals
Filter Configurations
Gravity Oil/Water Separator
Flow Diagram for a Batch Treatment
Ultraf iltration System
Flow Diagram of Activated Carbon
Adsorption with Regeneration
Flow Diagram for Recycling with a
Coolint Tower
Countercurrent Rinsing (Tanks)
Effect of Added Rinse Stages on Water
Page
1440
1441
1442
1443
1444
1445
1446
1447
1448
1449
1450
1451
1452
1453
1454
1455
1456
1457
1458
1459
Use
              xlii

-------
                   LIST OF FIGURES (Continued)
Figure

VXII-1 •'


VIII-2


Vl.II-3


VIII-4


VIII-5


VIII-6


VIII-7


VII1-8


VIII-9


VIII-10


VIII-11


VIII-12

VII1-13

VIII-14


VIII-15


VIII-16 •


VIII-17
Title             '-                      Page

  General Logic Diagram of Computer  .   1531
    Cost Model    \ .     '  .  •

  Logic Diagram of Module Design        1532
    Procedure

  Logic Diagram of the Cost             1533
    Estimation Routine

  Capital Cost of a Spray Rinsing       1534
    System

  Capital and Annual Costs of Aerated   1535
    Rectangular Fiberglass Tanks

  Capital and Annual Costs of Centri-   1536
    fugal Pumps

  Capital and Annual Costs of Cooling   1537
    Towers and Holding Tank

  Capital and Annual Costs of Holding   1538
    Tanks and Recycle Piping

  Capital and Annual Costs of           1539
    Equalization

  Capital and Annual Costs of Cyanide   1540
    Precipitation

  Capital and Annual Costs of Chromium  1541
    Reduction

  Capital Costs of Iron Coprecipitation 1542

  Annual Costs of Iron Coprecipitation  .1543

  Capital and Annual Costs of Chemical  1544
    Emulsion Breaking
  Capital and Annual Costs of Ammonia
    Steam Stripping
1545
  Capital and Annual Costs of Chemical  1546
    Precipitation

  Capital Costs for Carbon Steel Vacuum 1547
    Filters      !
                             xliii

-------
Figure

VIII-18


VIII-19

VIII-20


VIII-21

XI-1


X-l



X-2
    LIST OP FIGURES (Continued)

Title                                  Page

  Capital Costs for Stainless Steel    1548;
    Vacuum Filters

  Annual Costs for Vacuum Filters      1549

  Capital and Annual Costs for Multi-  1550
    media and Cartridge Filtration

  Annual Costs for' Contract Hauling    1551

  BPT Treatment Train for the Non-     1755
    ferrous Metals Forming Category

  BAT Option 1 and 2 Treatment Train   1912
    for the Nonferrous Metals Forming      ;
    Category

  BAT Option 3 Treatment Train for     1913
    the Nonferrous Metals Forming
    Category
                               xliv

-------
                            SECTION V

            WATER USE AND WASTEWATER CHARACTERISTICS
This , section  presents  a summary of the  analytical  data  that
characterize the raw wastewater in the category.   Flow data that
serve  as the basis for developing regulatory flow allowances  in
•the  nonferrous  metals forming category are also  summarized  in
this  section.   The analytical and flow data were obtained  from
four  sources:   information obtained during a telephone  survey;
data  collection  portfolios (dcps);  sampling and analysis  pro-
grams;  and,long-term or historical data.   Confidential informa-
tion was handled in accordance with 40 CFR Part 2.

DATA SOURCES •                      '

Telephone Survey         ;

As  described in Section III of this  document,  a  comprehensive
telephone  survey  was  undertaken in order  to  determine  which
companies  should  be  included on the dcp  mailing  list,  i.e.,
whether or not operations within the scope of this category  were
performed  by the companies contacted.  In the telephone  survey,
the cont-act at the company was asked what metals were formed, the
type of forming operations (rolling, drawing, extruding, forging,
casting,  cladding,  powder metallurgy),  what surface treatment,
cleaning,  washing,  and rinsing operations were used,  the water
use  associated with all operations,  how wastewater was disposed
of,  and if there was any treatment in place.  In addition to the
telephone  contacts made during the  comprehensive  survey,  many
plants were contacted by telephone to clarify dcp responses.

Data Collection Portfolios

Data  collection portfolios (dcps) are questionnaires which  were
developed  by the Agency to obtain extensive data from plants  in
the  nonferrous metals forming category.   The dcps, .sent to all
companies  known or believed to be engaged in  nonferrous  metals
forming, requested information under the authority of Section 308
of the Clean Water Act.  The information requested included plant
age,  production, number of employees, water usage, manufacturing
processes,  raw  material and process chemical usage,  wastewater
treatment technologies,  and the presence (known or believed)  of
toxic  pollutants  in the plant's raw and treated process  waste-
waters.

Complete  dcp  responses supplied the following  information  for
each  operation  present  at the  responding, plant:...  the  total
production in 1981,  the average production-'rate (Ib/hr), produc-
tion rate at full capacity,  and the quantity and rate of  waste-
water  discharge.   As  discussed  in Section  IV,  a  mass-based
regulation must relate water use and raw waste characteristics to
some  production normalizing parameter.   The average  production
rate is considered to be the parameter most applicable to  opera-
                               413

-------
tions in this category,  and has been used to normalize the water
and wastewater flows discussed in this section.

Two  production normalized flows (PNF's) were calculated for each
operation  reported  in the dcps.   The first PNF is  water  use,
defined as the volume of water or other fluid  (e.g.,  emulsions,
lubricants)  required  per  mass of metal processed  through  the
operation.   Water use is based on the sum of recycle and make-up
flows  to a given process.   The second PNF calculated  for  each
operation  is production normalized water discharge,  defined .as
the  volume  of  wastewater discharged from a  given  process  to
further treatment,  disposal, or discharge per mass of nonferrous
metal  processed.   Differences between the water use and  waste-
water  flows associated with a given stream result from  recycle,
evaporation,  and  carryover (or drag-out) on the  product.   The
production  values in this calculation correspond to the  produc-
tion  normalizing parameter,  PNP,  assigned to each  stream,  as
outlined in Section IV.

The  wastewater  flows  reported  in  the  dcps  were  production
normalized   and  grouped  by  waste  stream.    The   production
normalized flow information for each waste stream is presented in
this  section.   An analysis of factors affecting the  wastewater
flows is presented in Sections IX and X where representative BPT,
BAT,   NSPS,  and  pretreatment  discharge  flow  allowances  are
selected  for  use  in calculating the effluent  limitations  and
standards.

Sampling and Analysis Program

The  sampling  and analysis program was undertaken  primarily  to
identify pollutants of concern in the industry,  with emphasis on
priority  pollutants.   Wastewater samples were collected  at  23
nonferrous metals forming facilities.

This  section  summarizes  the activities undertaken  during  the
sampling trips and identifies the types of sites sampled and  the
parameters  analyzed.   It  also presents an overview  of  sample
collection,    preservation,   and   transportation   techniques.
Finally,  it  describes the pollutant parameters quantified,  the
methods of analyses and laboratories used, the detectable concen-
tration  of  each pollutant,  and the general  approach  used  to
ensure the reliability of the analytical data produced.
Site Selection.
obtain
Four
        	    Twenty-five sampling episodes were conducted to
        data  to  support the development of  these  regulations.
      of  these  plants were sampled in  data  gathering  efforts
supporting  the  development of guidelines for  other  industrial
categories {nonferrous metals manufacturing and battery  manufac-
turing).  Information on nonferrous metals forming operations was
collected  incidentally  to  the major sampling effort  at  these
plants.   Twenty-one  episodes were carried out  specifically  to
gather  data to support limitations and standards for this  cate-
gory.   These  plants  were selected to be representative of  the
industry,  based  on  information obtained during  the  telephone
                               414

-------
survey.   Considerations  included how well each facility  repre-
sented the subcategory as indicated by available data,  potential
problems  in meeting technology-bas"3d standards,  differences  in
production processes used, and wastewater treatment-in-place.  At
least  one plant in every subcategory was  sampled.   Two  plants
provided data for more than one subcategory.

As indicated in Table V-l,  the plants selected for sampling were
typically  plants with multiple forming operations and associated
surface and heat treatment operations.  Based on information from
the telephone survey and the dcps,  the flow rates and  pollutant
concentrations in the wastewaters discharged from the manufactur-
ing  operations at these plants are believed to b$ representative
of  the  flow rates and pollutant concentrations which  would  be
found in wastewaters generated by similar operations at any plant
in  the nonferrous metals forming category.   The sampled  plants
have a variety of treatment systems,in place, ranging from plants
with no treatment to plants using the technologies considered  as
the basis for; regulation.

Field  Sampling.   After . selection of the plants to be  sampled,
personnel at each plant were contacted by telephone, and notified
by letter when a visit would be expected as authorized by Section
308 of the Clean Water Act.   In most cases,  a preliminary visit
was  made to the plant to select the sources of wastewater to  be
sampled.   The sample points included,  but were not limited  to,
untreated and treated discharges,  process wastewater,  partially
treated wastewater,  and intake water.  The actual sampling visit
was also scheduled during the preliminary visit.

Sample Collection, Preservation, and Transportation.  Collection,
preservation,  and transportation of samples were accomplished in
accordance  with procedures outlined in Appendix III of "Sampling
and Analysis Procedures for Screening of Industrial Effluents for
Priority  Pollutants" (published by the Environmental  Monitoring
and Support Laboratory,  Cincinnati,  Ohio,  March 1977, revised,
April 1977), "Sampling Screening Prpcedure for the Measurement of
Priority  Pollutants" (published by the EPA  Effluent  Guidelines
Division,  Washington,  D.C.,  October 1976), and in the proposed
304(h) methods (44 FR 69464,  December 3,  1979).  The procedures
are summarized in the paragraphs that follow.

Whenever  practical,  samples were taken from midchannel at  mid-
depth  in  a 'turbulent,  well-mixed portion of the waste  stream.
Periodically, the temperature and pH of each waste stream sampled
were measured on-site.

Each large composite (Type 1) sample was collected in a  9-liter,
wide-mouth  pickle  jar that had been washed with  detergent  and
water,  rinsed with tap water,  rinsed with distilled water,  and
air dried at:room temperature.

Before collection of Type 1 samples, new Tygon  tubing was cut to
minimum  lengths  and installed on the inlet and outlet  .(suction
and  discharge) fittings of the automatic  sampler.   Two  liters


                               415

-------
 (2.1  quarts)  of blank water,  known to be free of organic  com-
pounds  and  brought  to the sampling site  from  the  analytical
laboratory,  were  pumped  through the sampler and  its  attached
tubing; the water was then discarded.

A blank (control sample) was produced by pumping an additional  2
liters  of blank water through the sampler and into the  original
blank  water bottle.   The blank sample was sealed in a Teflon  -
lined  cap,  labeled,  and  packed  in ice in  a  plastic  foam—
insulated  chest.   This  sample  was  subsequently  analyzed  to
determine any contamination contributed by the automatic sampler.

During  collection  of each Type 1 sample,  the  pickle  jar  was
packed  in ice in a plastic foam-insulated container to cool  the
sample.   After the complete composite sample had been collected,
it was mixed and a 1-liter aliquot to be used for metals analysis
was  dispensed into a plastic bottle.   The aliquot was preserved
on-site by the addition of nitric acid to pH less than 2.  Metals
samples  were  stored at room temperature until the  end  ,of  the
sampling  trip at which time they were shipped to the appropriate
laboratory for analysis.

After removal of the 1-liter metals aliquot,  the balance of  the
composite  sample was divided into aliquots to be used for analy-
sis  of  nonvolatile  organics,   conventional  parameters,   and
nonconventional parameters.  If a portion of the composite sample
was  requested  by  a representative of .  the  sampled  plant  for
independent analysis, an aliquot was placed in a sample container
supplied by the representative.

Water samples to be analyzed for cyanide,  total phenol,   oil and
grease,  and volatile organics were not obtained from the compos-
ite sample.   Water samples for these analyses were taken as one-
time  grab samples during the time that the composite sample  was
collected.

The cyanide, total phenol,  and oil and grease samples were stored
in  new  bottles which had been iced and  labeled,   1-liter  (33.8
ounce)  plastic  bottles for the cyanide   sample,   0.95-liter . (1
quart) amber glass bottles  for the total  phenol sample,  and 0.95-
liter (1 quart)  wide-mouth glass bottles  with a Teflon  lid liner
for  the oil and grease sample.   The samples were  preserved  as
described below.

Sodium  hydroxide  was  added to each sample to be  analyzed  for
cyanide,  until  the pH was elevated to 12 or more  (as   measured
using  pH paper).   Where the presence of chlorine was suspected,
the sample was tested for chlorine (which would decompose most of
the  cyanide)   by using potassium iodide/starch  paper.    If  the
paper tuned blue (indicating chlorine was present),  ascorbic acid
crystals  were  slowly added and dissolved until a  drop   of  the
sample  produced  no change in the color  of the test  paper.    An
additional 0.6 gram (0.021  ounce)  of ascorbic acid was added,  and
the sample bottle was sealed (by a Teflon -lined  cap),   labeled,
iced, and shipped for analysis.
                               416

-------
Sulfuric  acid was added to each sample to be analyzed for  total
phenol,  until the pH was reduced to 2 or less (as measured using
pH  paper).   The sample bottle was sealed,  labeled,  iced,  and
shipped for analysis.

Sulfuric acid was added to each sample to be analyzed for oil and
grease,  until the pH was reduced to 2 or less (as measured using
pH .test paper).   The sample bottle was sealed (by a Teflon   lid
liner), labeled, iced, and shipped for analysis.

Each  sample  to be analyzed for volatile organic pollutants  was
stored  in  a new 125-ml (4.2-ounce:) glass bottle that  had  been
rinsed with tap water and1 distilled' water,  heated to 150C (221F)
for one hour,  and cooled.   This method was also used to prepare
the septum arid lid for each bottle.   When used,  each bottle was
filled  to  overflowing, ; sealed with a Teflon   -faced  silicone
septum (Teflon  side down),  capped, labeled, and iced.  Hermetic
sealing  was  verified  by  inverting  and  tapping  the   sealed
container  to  confirm the absence of air bubbles.   (If  bubbles
were  found,  the bottle was opened.,  a few additional  drops  of
sample  were added,  and a new seal; was installed.)  Samples were
maintained hermetically sealed and iced until analyzed.

Sample Analysis.   Samples were sent by air to one of the labora-
tories  listed in Table V-2.   The samples were analyzed  for  23
metals,  including seven of the priority metal pollutants (beryl-
lium,,  cadmium,  chromium,  copper, nickel, lead, and zinc) using
inductively-coupled  argon plasma emission spectroscopy (ICAP) as
proposed in 44 FR 69464,  December 3,  1979.   The remaining  six
priority  metal pollutants,  with the exception of mercury,  were
analyzed  by atomic absorption spectroscopy (AA) as described  in
40  CFR Part 136.   Mercury "analysis was performed  by  automated
cold  vapor atomic absorption.   Analysis for the seven  priority
metals analyzed by ICAP was also performed by AA on 10 percent of
the samples to determine itest comparability.  Because the results
showed  no significant differences In detection or quantification
levels, ICAP data were used for the seven priority metals.  Three
nonconventional  metal  pollutants  (columbium,   tantalum,   and
tungsten)  were  analyzed, by X-ray fluorescence and  uranium  was
analyzed by fluorpmetry.
                               417

-------
                     Metals Analyzed by ICAP
                    Calcium
                    Magnesium
                    Sodium
                    Aluminum
                    Boron
                    Barium
                   *Beryllium
                   *Cadmium
                    Cobalt
                   *Chromium
                   *Copper
                    Gold-
 Iron
 Manganese
 Molybdenum
*Nickel
*Lead
 Tin
 Titanium
 Vanadium
 Yttrium
*Zinc
 Zirconium
                      Metals Analyzed by AA

                            *Antimony
                            *Arsenic
                            *Selenium
                            *Thallium
                            *Mercury
                            *Silver

                 Metals Analyzed by X-Ray Fluorescence

                            Columbium
                            Tantalum
                            Tungsten

                 Metals Analyzed by Fluorometry

                             Uranium
*Priority metals
Analyses  for  the  organic toxic pollutants  were  performed  by
Arthur D.  Little, ERGO, IT, Radian Sacramento, S-Cubecl, and West
Coast Technical Service.  Analyses for the toxic metal pollutants
were  performed  by CENTEC,  Coors,  EPA  (Region  III),  EPA-ESD
(Region  IV)/  Radian Austin,  Versar,  and  NUS.   Analyses  f9r
cyanide,  and  conventional  and nonconventional pollutants  were
performed by ARO,  Edison, EPA (Region III), EPA-ESD (Region IV),
NUS, and Radian Austin.

EPA  did  not expect to find any asbestos  in  nonferrous  metals
forming  wastewaters  because this category only includes  metals
that  have  already  been refined from ores  that  might  contain
asbestos.   Therefore,  analysis  for  asbestos  fibers  was  not
performed.

Pesticide  priority  pollutants  were also  not  expected  to  be
sigi.'.f icant  in the nonf errous metals forming industry.   Samples
from one facility were analyzed for pesticide priority pollutants
                               418

-------
by electron capture-gas chromatography by the method specified in
44 FR 69464,  December 3, : 1979.  Pesticides were not detected in
these  samples,  .so  no  other samples were  analyzed  for  these
pollutants.                        .

Analyses for the remaining organic priority pollutants  (volatile
fraction,  base/neutral, and acid compounds) were conducted using
an isotope dilution method which is.a modification of the .analyt-
ical techniques specified in 44 PR 69464,  December 3, 1979. . The
isotope  dilution  method has been recently developed to  improve
the  accuracy  and reliability of the analysis.   A. copy  of  the
method is in the record of rulemakirig for this final  regulation.
However,  no  standard  was  used in the  analysis  of  2,3,7,8—
tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin  (TCDD,   pollutant  129).   Instead,
screening for this compound was performed by comparing analytical
results  to  EPA's gas chromatography/mass  spectroscopy  (GC/MS)
computer file.

Analysis  for  cyanide used methods specified in 40 CFR Part  136
and  described  in "Methods for Chemical Analysis for  Water  and
Wastes," EPA-600/4-79-020 (March 1979).

Past  studies1 by EPA and others have identified many  nonpriority
pollutant  parameters useful in characterizing industrial  waste-
waters and in evaluating treatment process removal  efficiencies.
Some of these pollutants may also be selected as reliable indica-
tors of the presence of specific priority pollutants.   For these
reasons,  a  number of nonpriority pollutants were studied' in the
course  of developing this regulation.   These pollutants may  be
divided into two general groups as shown in Table V-3.   Analyses
for  these pollutants were performed by the methods specified  in
40 CFR Part 136 and described in EPA-600/4-79-020.

The  analytical quantification levels used in evaluation  of  the
sampling  data  reflect  the accuracy of the  analytical  methods
employed.   Below these concentrations, the identification of the
individual  compounds is possible,  but quantification is  diffi-
cult.   Pesticides  and PCB's can be analytically  quantified 'at
concentrations  above 0.005 mg/1,  and other organic toxic levels
above  0.010 mg/1.   Levels associated with toxic metals  are  as
follows:   0.010 mg/1 for antimony; 0.010 mg/1 for arsenic; 0.005
mg/1  for  beryllium;  0.020  mg/1 for cadmium;  0.020  mg/1  for
chromium;  0.050 mg/1 for copper;  0.02 mg/1 for  cyanide;  0.050
mg/1  for lead;  0,0002 mg/1 for mercury;  0.050 mg/1/for nickel;
0.010 mg/1 for selenium;  0.010 mg/1 for silver;  0.010 mg/1  for
thallium; and 0.020 mg/1 for zinc.

The  detection limits used were reported with the analytical data
and hence are the appropriate limits to apply to the data, rather
than the method analytical quantification level.  Detection limit
variation  can  occur  as a result pf  a  number  of  laboratory-
specific,   equipment-specific,   daily  operator-specific,   and
pollutant-specific factors.  These factors can include day-to-day
differences  in machine calibration and variation in stock  solu-
tions,  operators,  and pollutant skmple matrices (i.e., presence
                               419

-------
of  some chemicals will alter the detection of particular  pollu-
tants) .

Quality Control.  Quality control 'measures used in performing all
analyses  conducted for this program complied with the guidelines
given  in "Handbook for Analytical Quality Control in  Water  and
Wastewater Laboratories" (published by EPA Environmental Monitor-
ing and Support Laboratory,  Cincinnati, Ohio, 1976).  As part of
the  daily  quality  control program,  blanks  (including  sealed
samples of blank water carried to each sampling site and returned
unopened,  as well as samples of blank water used in the  field),
standards, and spiked samples were routinely analyzed with actual
samples.   As part of the overall program, all analytical instru-
ments  (such as balances,  spectrophotometers, and recorders) were
routinely maintained and calibrated.

Historical Data

A  useful  source of long-term or historical data  available  for
nonferrous  metals  forming plants are the  Discharge  Monitoring
Reports (DMR's) filed to comply with National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination  System (NPDES) or State Pollutant Discharge Elimina-
tion  System (SPDES) requirements.   DMR's were obtained  through
the  EPA Regional offices and state regulatory agencies  for  the
years  1981  through the most recent date available.   The  DMR's
present  a  summary of the analytical results from  a  series  of
samples  taken during a given month for the pollutants designated
in the plant's permit.  In general, minimum, maximum, and average
values,  in mg/1 or Ibs/day, are presented for such pollutants as
total suspended solids,  oil and grease,  pH, chromium, and zinc.
The  samples  were collected from  the  plant  outfall(s),  which
represents the discharge(s) from the plant.   For facilities with
wastewater treatment,  the DMR's provide a measure of the perfor-
mance of the treatment system.  In theory, these data could serve
as  a basis for characterizing treated wastewater from nonferrous
metals  forming  plants.   However,  there is no  information  on
concentration of pollutants in wastewater prior to treatment  and
too  little  information on the performance of the plant  at  the
time  the samples were collected to use these data in  evaluating
the  performance  of  various  levels  of  treatment.   The  data
reported  in DMR's were used to compare the treatment performance
of  actual plants to the treatment  effectiveness  concentrations
presented in Section VII.    The statistical analysis is presented
in the Administrative Record for this rulemaking.              .

WATER USE AND WASTEWATER CHARACTERISTICS

In  the following discussion,  water use,  wastewater  discharge,
current .recycle  practices,  and  analytical sampling  data  are
presented for each waste stream by subcategory.   These data were
collected from the dcps and during field  sampling.    Appropriate
tubing  or  background .blank and source water concentrations  are
presented with the summaries of the sampling data.  The method by
which  each  sample  was collected is  indicated  by  number,   as
follows,  unless otherwise indicated:
                               420

-------
     1  one-time grab
     2  manual: composite during intermittent process operation
     3  8-hour manual composite     ;'
     4  8-hour automatic composite
     5  24-hour manual composite
     6  24-hour automatic composite

To  simplify the presentation of the sampling  data,  the  actual
analytical  data are presented only for those pollutants detected
in  any  sample  of that wastewater  stream.   No  analyses  were
performed on priority pollutants 89-113,  unless otherwise  indi-
cated.

Figures V-l through V-25 show the -location1 of wastewater sampling
sites at each facility.

As  shown  in  Table V-l, ', not every waste  stream  generated  by
nonferrous  metals  forming  operations was  sampled  during  the
screen and verification sampling programs.   In order to evaluate
the  applicability of the various treatment technologies to  non-
sampled waste streams,  the physical and chemical characteristics
.of  these streams were extrapolated from similar sampled.streams.
This  extrapolation was also necessary to estimate the  costs  of
the various treatment technologies, as discussed in Section VIII.
Extrapolation  of sampling data from sampled to non-sampled waste
streams was not used to select pollutants for regulation in  this
category (see Section VI).

In  order  to  verify the assumption that physical  and  chemical
characteristics  for one process wastewater would be  similar  to
another,  the Agency asked 49 plants to submit analytical data on
specific  raw waste streams which had not been sampled during the
screening and verification program.   Twenty-four plants provided
these  data  directly and 18 plants provided samples to  be  ana-
lyzed.   Four  plants responded that they were no longer  forming
the  metal . for which information was requested,  or  that  their
production  schedule did not include the metal  specified  within
the time frame of that request.   Three plants reported that they
did  not actually generate the waste stream for which information
was requested.

In  all the Agency received analytical data for -41 waste  streams
for  which we;had not previously had any wastewater  characteris-
tics  data.   Most  of these wastewater streams  were  relatively
small  volume streams,  such as forming lubricants.   These  data
were  not used to select pollutants 'for regulation in this  cate-
gory  (see  Section  VI) or to  estimate  the  pollutant  loading
currently generated by the; category.   However, they were used to
verify  assumptions  of  wastewater  characteristics.   All  data
obtained  through the plant self-sampling program may be found in
the record supporting this rulemaking.
                               421

-------
Waste  streams  generated  by similar  physical  processes  using
similar  process  chemicals will have very similar  physical  and
chemical  characteristics.   For  example,  water  used  to  cool
extrusions will have low concentrations of all pollutants.   This
is  demonstrated by the results of the chemical analyses of  lead
and  nickel extrusion press and solution heat  treatment  contact
cooling  water (Table V-4).   The major difference between  these
two  waste streams is that the concentration of lead is higher in
the  lead  cooling water (0.13 mg/1 vs.  not  detected)  and  the
concentration  of  nickel is higher in the nickel  cooling  water
(0.14  mg/1  vs.  0.007  mg/1).   This pattern will  be  repeated
whenever water, without additives, is used to cool hot metal.

In contrast,  spent.rolling emulsions have high concentrations of
several  pollutants.    The results of chemical analyses of  lead,
nickel, and precious metals rolling spent emulsions are presented
in Table V-5.   All three waste streams have high  concentrations
of  oil  and grease,   total suspended and dissolved  solids,  and
several  metals.   The  lead rolling spent emulsion  has  a  high
concentration  of  lead  (29.0 mg/1),  the nickel  rolling  spent
emulsion has high concentrations of nickel and chrome (8.95  mg/1
and  1.27 mg/1,  respectively),  and the precious metals  rolling
spent  emulsion has high concentrations of  copper,  silver,  and
zinc (25.0 mg/1,  0.13 mg/1, and 6.00 mg/1, respectively).  It is
not surprising to find chromium in nickel rolling spent emulsions
and  copper  and zinc in precious metals rolling spent  emulsions
because chromium is a common alloy of nickel and copper and  zinc
are common alloys of precious metals.  Thus, the major difference
between  the  three waste streams is the presence of  the  metals
formed in the operation generating the waste stream.

Prom  the  discussion above,  it follows  that  lead-tin-bismuth,
nickel-cobalt,  and zinc drawing spent emulsions will have chemi-
cal  characteristics  similar  to precious metals  drawing  spent
emulsions.   The major difference between the waste streams  will
be the concentration of the metal drawn.   Similarly,  magnesium,
zinc,  and  refractory  metals rolling spent emulsions will  have
chemical characteristics similar to lead,  nickel,  and  precious
metals  rolling spent emulsions,  except for the concentration of
the metal rolled.

Arguments  analogous  to those presented above were used to  esti-
mate the physical and chemical characteristics of all non-sampled
waste streams.   These estimations,  and summaries of  analytical
data,  water  use,  wastewater  discharge,  and  current  recycle
practices, are presented below.
                                                As  discussed  in
                                                    coolants.  and
Lead-Tin-Bismuth Forming Subcategory

Lead-Tin-Bismuth  Rolling  Spent  Emulsions.
SectionIII,oil-in-water  emulsions are used as
lubricants.   Rolling  emulsions are typically recycled using in-
line  filtration  and periodically batch discharged  when  spent.
Water use,  wastewater discharge,  and current recycle  practices
corresponding to this waste stream are summarized in Table V-6.
                               422

-------
Table  V-7  summarizes the analytical sampling data for  priority
and  selected conventional and nonconventional  pollutants.   One
sample  of  rolling spent emulsions was collected at  one  plant.
Elevated concentrations of lead (29 mg/1),  zinc (1.4 mg/1),  oil
and  grease (270 mg/1),  and TSS (480 mg/1) were detected in  the
sample.     • ••                       :

Lead-Tin-Bismuth Rolling Spent Soap Solutions.   As discussed  in
Section  III, :  soap solutions can be'used as lubricants and cool-
ants in rolling.  Of the plants surveyed, only one plant reported
the  use of soap solutions in  rolling.   Water  use,  wastewater
discharge,  and  current recycle practices corresponding to  this
waste stream are summarized in Table V-8.

To  estimate pollutant loads for this stream,  the Agency assumed
that this stream would have wastewater characteristics similar to
rolling  spent emulsions in this subcategory.   Spent soap  solu-
tions  and spent emulsions are both used as lubricants and.  cool-
ants in rolling.   Therefore, the pollutants present and the mass
loadings  of pollutants, present in rolling spent  soap  solutions
and  rolling spent emulsions were expected to be  similar.   How-
ever,  spent  soap  solutions  were expected to have an  oil  and
grease  mass  loading similar to  alkaline  cleaning  rinsewater.
Spent  soap  solutions  contain  the same  process  chemicals  as
alkaline  cleaning  baths and so were expected to  have  oil  and
grease  loadings similar to the loadings carried, out in  alkaline
cleaning rinsewater.      I

Lead-Ti n-B ismu th  prawing  Spent  Neat  Oils.   As  discussed  in
Section  III,  oil-based lubricants may be used in drawing opera-
tions t6 ensure uniform drawing temperatures and avoid  excessive
wear  on  dies and mandrels.   Drawing oils are usually  recycled
until  their  lubricant  properties are exhausted  and  are  then
contract hauled^.   Water use,  wastewater discharge,  and current
recycle operations corresponding to this waste stream are  summa-
rized in Table:V-9.

Since  none of the plants surveyed reported discharging the spent
neat oils, no samples were collected.
Lead-Tin-Bismuth  Drawing  Spent  Emulsions.    As  discussed  in
                oil-water  emulsions  can  be  used  as   drawing.
              The  drawing emulsions are frequently recycled  and
Section  III,
lubricants.
batch  discharged periodically after their lubricating properties
are  exhausted.   Water use,  wastewater discharge,  and  current
recycle  practices corresponding to this waste stream are  summa-
rized in Table V-10.
                           •;      '    1   -'
No  samples of drawing spent emulsions were collected during  the
sampling program.   However, to estimate pollutant loads for this
stream, the Agency assumed that this stream would have wastewater
characteristics  similar  to  rolling  spent  emulsions  in  this
subcategory.   These two waste streams are generated from similar
physical   processes   which  use  similar   process   chemicals.
                               423

-------
Therefore,  the  pollutants present in each waste stream and  the
mass loading (mg/kkg product) at which they are present should be
similar.

Lead-Tin-Bismuth Drawing Spent Soap Solutions.   As discussed  in
SectionIII,soap solutions can be used as drawing  lubricants.
The  drawing  soap  solutions are frequently recycled  and  batch
discharged  periodically after their lubricating  properties  are
exhausted.   Water use, wastewater discharge, and current recycle
practices  corresponding  to this waste stream are summarized  in
Table V-ll.

Table  V-12  summarizes the analytical data  for  priority  metal
pollutants   and   selected  conventional   and   nonconventiorial
pollutants.   One  sample  of  drawing spent soap  solutions  was
collected at one plant.   Elevated concentrations of antimony (21
mg/1),  lead (3,100 mg/1),  zinc (230 mg/1), tin 1,600 mg/1), oil
and grease (353,000 mg/1) and TSS (294,000 mg/1) were detected in
the sample.

Lead-Tin-Bismuth  Extrusion  Press and  Solution  Heat  Treatment
Contact Cooling Water.    As discussed in Section III, heat treat-
ment  of lead-tin-bismuth products frequently involves the use of
a  water quench in order to achieve desired metallic  properties.
Fourteen  plants  reported 17 extrusion press and  solution  heat
treatment  processes  that  involve  water  quenching  either  by
spraying  water on the metal as it emerges from the die or  press
or  by direct quenching into a contact water  bath.   Water  use,
wastewater discharge, and current recycle practices corresponding
to this waste stream are summarized in Table V-13.

Table  V-14 summarizes the analytical sampling data for  priority
and  selected conventional and nonconventional  pollutants.   One
sample  of  extrusion press and solution heat  treatment  contact
cooling water was collected at one plant.  An elevated concentra-
tion of chromium (4.6 mg/1) was detected in the sample.

Lead-T in-Bismuth  Extrusion  Press Hydraulic Fluid  Leakage.   As
discussedin Section III,  due to the large force applied  by  a
hydraulic  extrusion press,  hydraulic fluid leakage is  unavoid-
able.   Water  use,  wastewater  discharge,  and current  recycle
practices  corresponding to this waste stream are  summarized  in
Table V-15.

At  proposal,  the  Agency  assumed that this stream  would  have
wastewater  characteristics  similar  to  press  hydraulic  fluid
leakage in the nickel-cobalt subcategory.   After proposal,  this
assumption was confirmed by plant self-sampling data.
Lead-Tin-Bismuth  Swaging  Spent
Emulsions.
         be
 As  discussed  in
used  as   swaging
               and
Section  III,   oil-water  emulsions  can  be  used  as
lubricants.   The  swaging emulsions are frequently recycled
batch  discharged periodically after their lubricating properties
are  exhausted.   Water use,  wast.ewater discharge,  and  current
recycle  practices corresponding to this waste stream are  summa-
                               424

-------
rized in Table V-16.

At  proposal, > the  Agency assumed that this  stream  would  have
wastewater  characteristics similar to rolling spent emulsions in
this subcategory.   After proposal, this assumption was confirmed
by plant self-sampling data.

Lead-Tin-Bismuth Continuous Strip Casting Contact Cooling  Water.
As discussed in Section III,  in continuous casting,  no restric-
tions  are  placed  on the length of the casting and  it  is  not
necessary  to  interrupt production to remove the  cast  product.
Although  the use of continuous casting techniques has been found
to  significantly reduce or eliminate the use of contact  cooling
water and oil lubricants, five plants reported the use of contin-
uous  strip contact cooling water.   Water use,  wastewater  dis-
charge, and current recycle practices corresponding to this waste
stream are summarized in Table V-17.

Table  V-18 summarizes the analytical sampling data for  priority
and  selected conventional and nonconventional  pollutants.   One
sample  of  continuous strip casting contact  cooling  water  was
collected  at  one plant.   Elevated concentrations of lead  (1.2
mg/1) and zinc (3.1 mg/1) were detected in the sample.
                          1     _   •  f
Lead-Tin-Bismuth  Semi-Continuous Ingot Casting  Contact  Cooling
Water„   As  discussed  in  Section  III,  semi-continuous  ingot
casting  may require the use of contact cooling water in order to
achieve the desired physical properties of the metal.  Water use,
wastewater discharge, and current recycle practices corresponding
to this waste stream are summarized in Table V-19.

Table  V-20 summarizes the analytical sampling data for  priority
and  selected'conventional and nonconventional  pollutants.   Two
samples  of semi-continuous ingot casting contact  cooling  water
were collected from one stream at one plant.  Elevated concentra-
tions  of lead (1.10 mg/1) and TSS (80 mg/1) were detected in the
samples       ;

Lead-Tin-Bismuth  Shot Casting Contact Cooling  Water.   As  dis-
cussed in Section III,  contact cooling water is required to cool
the  cast lead shot so that it will not reconsolidate as well  as
to  achieve the desired metallic properties.   Water use,,  waste-
water discharge,  and current recycle practices corresponding  to
this waste stream are summarized in Table Vi-21.

Table  V-22 summarizes the; analytical sampling data for  priority
and selected conventional and nonconventional pollutants.   Three
samples of shot casting contact cooling water were collected from
one  stream at one plant.   Elevated concentrations of lead (52.2
mg/1),  antimony (3.30 mg/1), tin (10.5 mg/1), oil and grease (22
mg/1), and TSS.(420 mg/1) were detected in the samples.


Lead-Tin-Bismuth Shot Forming Wet Air Pollution Control Slowdown.
As  discussed in Section III,  shot forming may require  wet  air


                               425

-------
pollution control in order to meet air quality standards.  Of the
plants  surveyed,  only one reported the use of wet air pollution
control  on  a shot forming  operation.   Water  use,  wastewater
discharge,  and  current recycle practices corresponding to  this
waste stream are summarized in Table V-23.

At  proposal,  the  Agency assumed that this  stream  would  have
wastewater   characteristics  similar'  to  shot  casting  contact
cooling water in this subcategory.   After proposal, this assump-
tion was confirmed by plant self-sampling data.

Lead-Tin-Bismuth Alkaline Cleaning Spent Baths.   As discussed in
SectionIII,alkaline cleaning is commonly used to clean  lead,
tin,  and  bismuth  surfaces.   Products can be cleaned  with  an
alkaline  solution  either by immersion  or  spray.   Water  use,
wastewater discharge, and current recycle practices corresponding
to this waste stream are summarized in Table V-24.

Table  V-25 summarizes the analytical sampling data for  priority
and  selected conventional and nonconventional  pollutants.   One
sample  of  an alkaline cleaning spent bath was collected at  one
plant.   Elevated  concentrations of lead  (183  mg/1),  antimony
(7.30 mg/1),  oil and grease (600 mg/1),  and TSS (560 mg/1) were
detected in the sample.
Lead-Tin-Bismuth  Alkaline  Cleaning  Rinse.
As  discussed  in
Section III,  rinsing, usually with warm water, generally follows
the alkaline cleaning process to prevent the solution from drying
on  the product.   Water use,  wastewater discharge,  and current
recycle  practices corresponding to this waste stream are  summa-
rized in Table V-26.

Table  V-27 summarizes the analytical sampling data for  priority
and selected conventional and nonconventional  pollutants.   Four
samples  of alkaline cleaning rinsewater were collected from  two
streams  at  one plant.   Elevated concentrations of  lead  (40.8
mg/1),  antimony (1.10 mg/1), and TSS (260 mg/1) were detected in
the samples.

Lead-Tin-Bismuth  i/egreasing  Spent Solvents.   As  described  in
Section III, solvent cleaners are used to remove lubricants (oils
and  greases) applied to the surface of nonferrous metals  during
mechanical  forming operations.   Basic solvent cleaning  methods
include  straight vapor degreasing,  immersion-vapor  degreasing,
spray-vapor degreasing,  ultrasonic vapor degreasing,  emulsified
solvent degreasing, and cold cleaning.

Solvents most commonly used for all types of vapor degreasing are
trichloroethylene,   1,1,1-trichloroethane,  methylene  chloride,
perchloroethylene,   and  various  chlorofluorocarbons.   Solvent
selection  depends  on the required process temperature  (solvent
boiling point), product dimension, and metal characteristics.
Contaminated  vapor degreasing solvents are frequently  recovered
by distillation.
                               426

-------
Since  none  of the plants surveyed  reported  discharging  spent
decreasing solvents, no samples were collected.

Lead-Tin-Bismuth Operations Which Do Not Use Process Water.   The
Agency  has  established  no discharge allowance  for  operations,
which do not generate process wastewater.   The following  opera-
tions  generate no process wastewater either because they are dry
or because they use noncontact cooling water only:

     Continuous Wheel Casting
     Continuous Sheet Casting
     Stationary Casting
     Shot Pressing • •  '    ',                   ..
     Forging
     Stamping             ,
     Pointing
     Punching
     Shot Blasting
     Slug Forming
     Powder Metallurgy Operations (Pressing, Sintering, Sizing)
     Powder Tumbling
     Melting
     Solder Cream Making
     Annealing            ;           :
     Tumble Cleaning      ;
     Slitting
     Sawing               i
     Coiling, Spooling
     Trimming.

Magnesium Forming Subcategory

Magnesium Rolling Spent Emulsions.   As discussed in Section III,
oil-water  emulsions are used in rolling operations  as  coolants
and  lubricants.   Rolling emulsions are typically recycled using
in-line filtration treatment.   Water use,  wastewater discharge,
and current recycle practices corresponding to this waste  stream
are summarized in Table V-28.                                .

Since  none  of  the  plants surveyed  reported  discharging  the
rolling  spent emulsions,  no samples of this.waste  stream  were
collected.                 ;                                   •

Magnesium Forging Spent Lubricants.  As discussed in Section III,
either water, oil, or granulated carbon can be applied to forging
dies for proper lubrication.   Water use, wastewater characteris-
tics,  and  current recycle practices corresponding to this waste
stream are summarized in Table V-29.

Since  none  of  the plants  surveyed  reported  discharging  the
forging  spent lubricants,  no samples of this waste stream  were
collected.     ; •           I                '•....

Magnesium Forging Contact Cooling Water.  As discussed in Section
III,  forging  dies and ring roller parts 'and tooling may require
                               427

-------
cooling  to maintain the proper die temperature between  forgings
or rolling, or to cool the forging dies prior to removal from the
forge  hammer.   The contact cooling water may also be used as  a
heat  treatment  to improve mechanical properties  of  the  metal
being  forged.   Water  use,  wastewater discharge,  and  current
recycle  practices corresponding to this waste stream are  summa-
rized in Table V-30.

No samples of forging contact cooling water were collected during
the sampling program.   However,  to estimate pollutant loads for
this  stream,  the  Agency assumed that this  stream  would  have
wastewater  characteristics similar to extrusion press and  solu-
tion heat treatment contact cooling water in the lead-tin-bismuth
subcategory.   These  two  waste streams are generated  by  using
water, without additives, to cool hot metal.  The only difference
between  the wastewater characteristics of the two streams should
be the metals present.  The mass loading (mg/kkg) of magnesium in
magnesium  forming solution heat treatment contact cooling  water
should be similar to the mass loading of lead in lead-tin-bismuth
extrusion  press  and  solution heat  treatment  contact  cooling
water, and vice versa.  Also, there should be no significant mass
loading of antimony in magnesium forming solution heat  treatment
contact  cooling water because magnesium is not commonly  alloyed
with  antimony.   The other pollutants in each waste stream,  and
the mass loading at which they are present, should be similar.

Magnesium Forging Equipment Cleaning Wastewater.  As discussed in
Section  III,  forging equipment may be periodically  cleaned  in
order to prevent the excessive buildup of oil, grease, and caked-
on  solid lubricants on the forging die.   Water use,  wastewater
discharge,  and  current recycle practices corresponding to  this
waste stream are summarized in Table V-31.

No  samples  of forging equipment cleaning wastewater  were  col-
lected during the sampling program.   However, to estimate pollu-
tant loads for this stream,  the Agency assumed that this  stream
would  have wastewater characteristics similar to alkaline clean-
ing  rinsewater in the lead-tin-bismuth subcategory.   These  two
waste  streams  ar.e generated by cleaning  operations  which  use
similar  process chemicals.   Since granulated coal and  graphite
suspensions  are  frequently used to lubricate magnesium  forging
operations,  magnesium forging equipment cleaning wastewater  may
contain  higher  mass  loadings of total  suspended  solids.   In
addition,  the  metals  present in the two waste  streams  should
differ.   The  mass  loading (mg/kkg) of magnesium  in  magnesium
forging  equipment cleaning wastewater should be similar  to  the
mass  loading  of  lead  in  lead-tin-bismuth  alkaline  cleaning
rinsewater, and vice versa.  Also, there should be no significant
concentration of antimony in magnesium forging equipment cleaning
wastewater  because magnesium is not'commonly alloyed with  anti-
mony.   The  other pollutants in each waste stream,  and the mass
loading at which they are present, should be similar.

Magnesium  Direct Chill Casting Contact Cooling Water.   As  dis-
cussed in Section III,  contact cooling water is a necessary part
                               428

-------
of direct chill casting.   The cooling water may be  contaminated
by  lubricants applied to the mold before and during the  casting
process.   Water use,  wastewater discharge,  and current recycle
practices  corresponding  ;to this waste stream are summarized  in
Table V-32.

The  one  nonferrous metals forming plant reporting  the  use  of
direct  chill casting contact cooling water discharges no  water,
therefore, no samples of this waste stream were collected.

Magnesium Surface Treatment Spent Baths.  As discussed in Section
III,  a  number  of chemical treatments may be applied after  the
forming of magnesium products.   The surface treatment baths must
be periodically discharged after their properties are  exhausted.
Water  use,  wastewater discharge,  and current recycle practices
corresponding to this waste stream are summarized in Table V-33.

Table  V-34 summarizes the analytical sampling data for  priority
and selected conventional and nonconventional pollutants.   Three
samples  of  surface treatment spent baths  were  collected  from
three streams at one plant.  Elevated concentrations of magnesium
(9,150 mg/1),  chromium (28,000 mg/1), zinc (89.0 mg/1), aluminum
(64 mg/1),  ammonia (97 mg/1),  oil and grease (47,000 mg/1), and
TSS (160 mg/1) were detected in the samples.

Magnesium Surface Treatment Rinse.   As discussed in Secti.on III,
rinsing  follows  the  surface treatment process to  prevent  the
solution  from  affecting  the surface of the  metal  beyond  the
desired amount*   Water usse,  wastewater discharge,  and  current
recycle  practices corresponding to this waste stream are  summa-
rized in Table V-35.     ;          '

Table  V-36 summarizes the analytical sampling data for  priority
and selected conventional and nonconventional pollutants.  Twelve
samples of surface treatment rinsewater were collected from eight
streams at one plant.   Elevated concentrations of magnesium (148
mg/1),  zinc (2.1 mg/1), .chromium (516 mg/1), ammonia (81 mg/1),
oil and grease (16 mg/1),  and TSS (97 mg/1) were detected in the
samples.                '           .

Magnesium  Sawing or Grinding Spent Emulsions.   As discussed  in
Section  III,;  sawing  or grinding operations  generally  require
lubrication  with  an  oil-water emulsion in  order  to  minimize
friction  and to dissipate excess heat from the metal and cutting
tool.   Water  use,  wastewater discharge,  and  current  recycle
practices  corresponding  to this waste stream are summarized  in
Table V-37.           •   •:

Since none of the plants surveyed reported discharging the sawing
or grinding spent emulsions, no samples of this waste stream were
collected.

Magnesium  De:greasing Spent Solvents.   As described  in  Section
III,  solvent  cleaners  are used to remove lubricants (oils  and
greases)  applied  to  the surface of  nonferrous  metals  during


                         :      429

-------
mechanical  forming operations.   Basic solvent cleaning  methods
include straight vapor degreasing, immersion-vapor degreasing,
spray-vapor degreasing,  ultrasonic vapor degreasing,  emulsified
solvent degreasing, and cold cleaning.

Solvents most commonly used for all types of vapor degreasing are
trichloroethylene,   1,1,1-trichloroethane,  methylene  chloride,
perchloroethylene,   and  various  chlorofluorocarbons.   Solvent
selection  depends on the required process  temperature  (solvent
boiling  point),  product dimension,  and metal  characteristics.
Contaminated  vapor degreasing solvents are frequently  recovered
by distillation.                                               ;
Since  none  of  the plants surveyed reported  discharging
degreasing solvents, nd samples were collected.

           Wet Air Pollution Control Slowdown.
                                                            spent
Magnesium
Section  III,  wet
control  air  pollution
scrubbers  are  frequently necessary over sanding
operations  where particulates are a problem or scrubbers may
	 	 	    As discussed  in
air pollution control devices are  needed  to
     from  some  operations.   For  instance,
                               'and  repairing
                                           be
necessary  when  particulates and smoke are  generated  from  the
partial  combustion  of oil-based lubricants as they contact  the
hot forging dies.   Water use,  wastewater discharge, and current
recycle  practices corresponding to this waste stream are  summa-
rized in Table V-38.

Table  V-39  summarizes the analytical data  for  priority  metal
pollutants   and   selected  conventional   and   nonconventional
pollutants.   One  sample of extrusion- press hydraulic fluid  was
collected  at one plant.   Elevated concentrations of lead (0,877
mg/1),  aluminum  (1.1  mg/1),  and magnesium  (7.51  mg/1)  were
detected in the sample.

Magnesium Operations Which Do Not Use Process Water.   The Agency
has not established a discharge allowance for operations which do
not  generate  process  wastewater.    The  following  operations
generate no process wastewater,  because they use only noncontact
cooling water or because they use no water at all:

     Extrusion  •           ..      -
     Shot Blasting
     Powder Atomization
     Screening
     Turning.                                                  [

Nickel-Cobalt Forming Subcategory

Nickel-Cobalt  Rolling Spent Neat Oils.
      	  	    As described in Section
      cold rolling of nickel-cobalt products may require the  use
                              The oils are usually recycled  with
III,
of  mineral oil lubricants.
in-line filtration and periodically disposed of by sale to an oil
reclaimer  or by incineration.   Because discharge of this stream
is not practiced,  limited flow data were available for analysis.
Water use,  wastewater discharge,  and current recycle  practices
                               430

-------
corresponding to this waste stream are summarized in Table V-40.

Since  none  of  the  plants surveyed  reported  discharging  the
rolling  spent neat oils,  no samples of this waste  stream  were
collected.

Nickel-Cobalt  Rolling Spent Emulsions.   As discussed in Section
III,  oil-water  emulsions  are  used in  rolling  operations  as
coolants  and  lubricants *    Rolling  emulsions  are   typically
recycled  using in-line filtration with periodic batch  discharge
of  the spent' emulsion.   Water use,  wastewater  discharge,  and
current  recycle practices corresponding to this waste stream are
summarized in Table V-41.

Table  V-42 summarizes the analytical sampling data for  priority
and selected conventional and nonconventional  pollutants.   Four
samples  of  rolling  spent  emulsions were  collected  from  two
streams at two plants.   Elevated concentrations of nickel  (34.2
mg/1)',  zinc  (6.70 mg/1),  oil and grease (7,600 mg/1),  and TSS
(6,800 mg/1) were detected in the samples.

Nickel-Cobalt  Rolling Contact Cooling Water.   As  discussed  in
Section III,  it is necessary to use contact cooling water during
rolling  to  prevent  excessive wear on  the  rolls,  to  prevent
adhesion  of metal to the rolls,  and to maintain a suitable  and
uniform  rolling  temperature.   Water is one type of  lubricant-
coolant which may be used.   Water use, wastewater discharge, and
current recycle practices corresponding to this waste stream  are
summarized in Table V-43.

Table  V-44 summarizes the analytical sampling data for  priority
and selected conventional and nonconventional pollutants.   Eight
samples of rolling contact cooling water were collected from four
streams  at two plants.   Elevated concentrations of nickel  (9.4
mg/1),  copper  (0.78 mg/1),  oil and grease (300 mg/1),  and TSS
(350 mg/1)  were detected in the samples.

Nickel-Cobalt  Tube Reducing Spent Lubricants.   As discussed  in
Section  III,  tube reducing,  much like rolling,  may require  a
lubricating  compound in order to prevent excessive wear  of  the
tube reducing rolls,  prevent adhesion of metal to the rolls, and
to  maintain  a suitable and uniform tube  reducing  temperature.
Water  use,  wastewater discharge,  and current recycle practices
corresponding to this waste stream are summarized in Table V-45.

Table  V-46 summarizes the analytical sampling data for  priority
and  selected conventional and nonconventional  pollutants.   One
sample  of tube reducing spent lubricants was collected from  one
stream  at one plant.   Elevated concentrations of  nickel  (58.0
mg/1),  copper (43.5 mg/1),  lead (47.6 mg/1),  zinc (63.1 mg/1),
and  oil  and grease (200,000 mg/1) were detected in the  sample.
In addition,  the sample had elevated concentrations of the toxic
organics  1,1,1-trichloroethane (33 mg/1) and  N-nitroso.diphenyl-
amine (28.2 mg/1).
                               431

-------
Nickel-Cobalt Drawing Spent Neat Oils.   As discussed in  Section
III,  oil-based  lubricants may be required in draws which have' a
high reduction in diameter.   Drawing oils are usually  recycled,
with  in-line filtration,  until their lubricating properties are
exhausted.   Water use, wastewater discharge, and current recycle
practices  corresponding to this waste stream are  summarized   in
Table V-47.

Since  none of the plants surveyed reported currently discharging
the drawing spent neat oils, no samples were collected.

Nickel-Cobalt Drawing Spent Emulsions.   As discussed in  Section
III,   oil-water   emulsions  are  often  used  as  coolants  and
lubricants  in  drawing.   The drawing emulsions  are  frequently
recycled and batch discharged periodically after their  lubricant
properties are exhausted.   Water use,  wastewater discharge, and
current  recycle practices corresponding to this waste stream are
summarized in Table V-48.

Table  V-49  summarizes the analytical data  for  priority  metal
pollutants   and   selected  conventional   and   nonconventional
pollutants.   One sample of drawing spent emulsions was collected
at  one  plant.   Elevated  concentrations of copper  (50  mg/1),
nickel (3.0 mg/1),  zinc (2.6 mg/1),  iron (17.0 mg/1),  oil  and
grease  (2,490  mg/1) and TSS (1,300 mg/1) were detected in  this
sample.

Nickel-Cobalt Extrusion Spent Lubricants.   As discussed in  Sec-
tion  III,  the extrusion process requires the use of a lubricant
to  prevent adhesion of the metal to the die and ingot  container
walls.   Water  use,  wastewater discharge,  and current  recycle
practices  corresponding to this waste stream are  summarized  in
Table V-50.

Since none of the plants surveyed reported wastewater discharging
extrusion spent lubricants,  no samples of this waste stream were
collected.

Nickel-Cobalt Extrusion Press and Solution Heat Treatment Contact
Cooling  Water.   As discussed in Section III,  heat treatment is
frequently used after extrusion to attain the desired  mechanical
properties in the extruded metal.   Contact cooling of the extru-
sion,  sometimes called press heat treatment, can be accomplished
with  a water spray near the die or by immersion in a water  tank
adjacent to the runout table.   Water use,  wastewater discharge,
and  current recycle practices corresponding to this waste stream
are summarized in Table V-51.

Table  V-52 summarizes the analytical sampling data for  priority
and  selected conventional and nonconventional  pollutants.    One
sample of extrusion press heat treatment contact cooling water
was collected at one plant.   An elevated concentration of  chro-
mium (0.130 mg/1) was detected in the sample.
Nickel-Cobalt  Extrusion  Press  Hydraulic  Fluid  Leakage.
As
                               432

-------
discussed  in1  Section III,  due to the large force applied by  a
hydraulic  press,  some hydraulic fluid leakage  is  unavoidable.
Water  use,  wastewater discharge,  and current recycle practices
corresponding to this waste stream are summarized in Table V-53.

Table  V-54 summarizes the analytical sampling data for  priority
and selected conventional and nonconventional pollutants.   Three
samples of extrusion press hydraulic fluid leakage were collected
at  one  plant.   Elevated concentrations of copper (0.75  mg/1),
nickel (1.30 mg/1), oil and grease (420 mg/1), and TSS (250 mg/1)
were detected in the samples.

Nickel-Cobalt Forging Spent Lubricants.   As discussed in Section
III,  either water,  oil,  or granulated carbon can be applied to
forging  dies  for proper  lubrication.   Water  use,  wastewater
discharge,  and  current recycle practices corresponding to  this
waste stream are summarized in Table V-55.
             i

Since  none  of  the plants  surveyed  reported  discharging  the
forging  spent lubricants,  no samples of this waste stream  were
collected.     .

Nickel-Cobalt:  Forging  Contact Cooling Water.   As discussed  in
Section  III/-  forging dies may require cooling to  maintain  the
proper  die  temperature between forgings,  or to cool  the  dies
prior  to  removal from the forge hammer.   The  contact  cooling
water  may also be used as a heat treatment to improve mechanical
properties  of the metal being  forged.   Water  use,  wastewater
discharge,  and  current recycle practices corresponding to  this
waste stream are summarized in Table V-56.

Table  V-57 summarizes the analytical sampling data for  priority
and  selected conventional and nonconventional  pollutants.   Two
samples  of  forging contact cooling water were collected at  two
plants.  Elevated concentrations of copper (3.4 mg/1), nickel (16
mg/1), and TSS (1,800 mg/1) were detected in the samples.
Nickel-Cobalt  Forging Equipment  Cleaning  Wastewater.
     Forging
prevent  the
die.   Water
equipment  may  be periodically cleaned in order to
excessive  buildup of oil and grease on the forging
use,  wastewater discharge, and current recycle practices corres-
ponding to this waste stream are summarized in Table V-58.
At  proposal,  the  Agency  assumed that this stream  would  have
wastewater  characteristics  similar to forging  contact  cooling
water in this subcategory.   These two waste stream are generated
from  similar physical processes (flushing a forging  or  forging
die  with  water),  so the pollutants present are expected to  be
similar.   However,  the water is used for different purposes, in
one case to cool a hot forging or forging die,  in the other,  to
remove built-up contaminants.   Therefore/  the mass loadings  of
oil  and  grease are expected to be higher in  forging  equipment
cleaning wastewater than in forging contact cooling water.  After
proposal, these assumptions were confirmed by plant self-sampling
data.                                                            -
                               433

-------
Nickel-Cobalt  Forging  Press Hydraulic Fluid Leakage.   As  dis-
cussed  in  Section  III,  due to the large force  applied  by  a
hydraulic  press,  some hydraulic fluid leakage  is  unavoidable.
Water  use,  wastewater discharge,  and current recycle practices
corresponding to this waste stream are summarized in Table V-59.

Table  V-60 summarizes the analytical sampling data for  priority
and  selected conventional and nonconventional  pollutants.   One
sample of forging press hydraulic fluid leakage was collected  at
one  plant.   Elevated concentrations of nickel (0.64 mg/1),  oil
and  grease (17 mg/1),  and TSS (500 mg/1) were detected  in  the
sample.

Nickel-Cobalt Metal Powder Production Atomization Wastewater.  As
discussed  in  Section  11,1,  metal powder is  commonly  produced
through  wet atomization of a molten metal.   Of the plants  sur-
veyed,  three  reported  the use of water in the  atomization  'of
molten  nickel.   Water use,  wastewater discharge,  and  current
recycle  practices corresponding to this waste stream are  summa-
rized in Table V-61.

Table  V-62 summarizes the analytical sampling data for  priority
and selected conventional and nonconventional pollutants.   Seven
samples  of  metal powder production wet  atomization  wastewater
were  collected  at three  plants.   Elevated  concentrations  of
chromium  (54.9 mg/1),  copper (45.0 mg/1),  nickel (210.0 mg/1),
iron  (10.3  mg/1),  and  TSS (317 mg/1)  were  detected  in  the
samples.

Nickel-Cobalt  Stationary  Casting  Contact  Cooling  Water.   As
discussed in Section III, contact cooling water is sometimes used
in stationary casting.   The cooling water may be contaminated by
lubricants  applied  to  the mold before and during  the  casting
process  and by the cast metal  itself.   Water  use,  wastewater
discharge,  and  current recycle practices corresponding to  this
waste stream are summarized in Table V-63.

At  proposal,  the  Agency  assumed that this stream  would  have
wastewater  characteristics  similar to rolling  contact  cooling
water in this subcategory.   After proposal,  this assumption was
confirmed by plant self-sampling data.

Nickel-Cobalt Vacuum Melting Steam Condensate.   As discussed  in
Section III, nickel-cobalt may be melted by an operation known as
vacuum  melting.   The  high  pressure steam used to  create  the
vacuum  condenses  to  an  extent  as  it  produces  the  vacuum.
Although  this  water  does not come in contact  with  the  metal
product,  it may potentially be contaminated with metal fines  or
components  of lubricant compounds volatilized in the furnace  if
scrap  is being melted.   Water use,  wastewater  discharge,  and
current  recycle practices corresponding to this waste stream are
summarized in Table V-64.

Table  V-65 summarizes the analytical sampling data for  priority
                               434

-------
and  selected conventional and nonconventional  pollutants.   One
sample  of vacuum melting steam condensate was collected  at  one
plant.   No  pollutants  were  detected in the  sample  at  above
treatable concentrations.-

Nickel-Cobalt  Annealing  and  Solution  Heat  Treatment  Contact
Cooling  Water.   As  discussed  in Section  III,  solution  heat
treatment  is implemented after annealing operations  to  improve
mechanical  properties by maximizing the concentration of harden-
ing  contaminants  in the solid metal  solution.   Solution  heat
treatment  typically involves .significant quantities  of  contact
cooling  water.   Water use,  wastewater discharge,  and  current
recycle  practices corresponding to this waste stream are  summa-
rized in Table V-66.

Table  V-67 summarizes the analytical sampling data for  priority
and  selected conventional and nonconventional  pollutants.   Two
samples  of  solution heat treatment contact cooling  welter  were
collected  from two streams at two plants.   Elevated  concentra-
tions of nickel (6.80 mg/1),  copper (2.92 mg/1),  oil and grease
(40 mg/1), and TSS (78 mg/1) were detected in the samples.

Nickel-Cobalt  Surface  Treatment Spent Baths.   As discussed  in
Section  HI/,  a  number of chemical surface  treatments  may  be
applied after the forming of nickel-cobalt products.  The surface
treatment  baths  must  be periodically  discharged  after  their
properties are exhausted.   Water use,  wastewater discharge, and
current  recycle practices corresponding to this waste stream are
summarized in Table V-68.

Table  V-69 summarizes the analytical sampling data for  priority
and   selected  conventional  and   nonconventional   pollutants.
Samples  of four spent surface treatment baths were collected  at
two  plants.   Very high concentrations of nickel (193,000 mg/1),
copper (4,800 mg/1),  cobalt (4,000 mg/1), chromium (3,600 mg/1),
fluoride (94,000 mg/1), and TSS (5,800 mg/1) were detected in the
samples.                • i

Nickel-Cobalt  Surface  Treatment-Rihsewater.   As  discussed  in
Section  III,  rinsing follows the surface treatment  process  to
prevent the surface treatment solution from affecting the surface
of  the metal beyond the desired amount.   Water use,  wastewater
discharge,  and  current recycle practices corresponding to  this
waste stream are summarized in Table V-70.

Table  V-71 summarizes the analytical sampling data for , priority
and   selected  conventional  and   nonconventional   pollutants.
Twenty-five  samples  of surface treatment rinsewater  were  col-
lected from nine streams at four plants.  Elevated concentrations
of nickel  (364 mg/1),  copper (87.4 mg/1),  chromium (18.8 mg/1),
cobalt (4.0 mg/1),  zinc (2.36 mg/1),  fluoride (250 mg/1), tita-
nium  (48.0 mg/1),  oil and grease (130 mg/1),  and TSS (760 mg/1)
were detected in the samples.

Nickel-Cobalt  Ammonia Rinse.   As discussed in Section  III,  an


                               435

-------
ammonia   rinse  may be used after acid pickling of  nickel-cobalt
products   to  neutralize .the acid prior to further   rinsing.   The
ammonia rinse is periodically batch discharged when spent.  Water
use,  wastewater discharge,  and current recycle practices corre-
sponding  to this waste stream are summarized  in Table V-72.

Table  V-73 summarizes the analytical sampling data for  priority
and  selected conventional and nonconventional  pollutants.   One
sample  of ammonia rinse wastewater was collected at  one  plant.
Elevated  concentrations of nickel (456 mg/1), copper (54.0 mg/1),
chromium  (108 mg/1),  zinc (32.0 mg/1), and TSS (9,000 mg/1) were
detected  in the sample.

Nickel-Cobalt Alkaline  Cleaning Spent Baths.   As discussed  in
Section   III,  alkaline  cleaners are  formulations  of  alkaline
salts,  water,  and surfactants.   Spent solutions  are discharged
from  alkaline cleaning processes.   Water use,  wastewater  dis-
charge, and current recycle practices corresponding to this waste
stream are summarized in Table V-74.

Table  V-75 summarizes the analytical sampling data for  priority
and  selected conventional and nonconventional pollutants.   Pour
samples of alkaline cleaning spent baths were collected from four
streams   at two plants.   Elevated concentrations of nickel  (122
mg/1),  copper  (39.2 mg/1),  zinc (3.90  mg/1),  chromium  (38.0
mg/1),  oil   and  grease (170 mg/1),  and TSS (4,000  mg/1)  were
detected  in the samples.

Nickel-Cobalt  Alkaline Cleaning Rinse.   As discussed in Section
III,  metal parts are usually rinsed following alkaline  cleaning
to remove the cleaning solution and any solubilized contaminants.
Water  use,   wastew.ater discharge,  and current recycle practices
corresponding to this waste stream are summarized in Table V-76.

Table  V-77 summarizes the analytical sampling data for  priority
and selected  conventional and nonconventional  pollutants.   Five
samples  of alkaline cleaning rinsewater were collected from four
streams at two plants.   Elevated concentrations of nickel  (5.58
mg/1), oil and grease (26 mg/1), and TSS (190' mg/1) were detected
in the samples.

Nickel-Cobalt  Molten Salt Rinse.   As discussed in Section  III,
when  molten  salt  baths are used to descale nickel  and  cobalt
alloys,  they are generally followed by a water quench and  rinse
step.   Water  use,  wastewater  discharge,   and current  recycle
practices  corresponding to this waste stream are  summarized  in
Table V-78.

Table  V-79 summarizes the analytical sampling data for  priority
and selected conventional and nonconventional pollutants.   Eight
samples  of  molten  salt  rinsewater were  collected  from  four
streams at four  plants.   Elevated concentrations of nickel (54.0
mg/1),  copper (8.05 mg/1),  cobalt (2.8 mg/1),   chromium  (1,100
mg/1), and TSS (4,200 mg/1) were detected in the samples.
                               436

-------
Nickel-Cobalt  Sawing or :Grinding Spent Emulsions.   As discussed
in Section III,  sawing or grinding operations generally  require
lubrication  .with  an  oil-water emulsion in  order  to  minimize
friction  and to dissipate excess heat from the metal and cutting
tool.   Water  use,  wastewater discharge,  and  current  recycle
practices  corresponding  to this waste stream are summarized  in
Table V-80.

Table  V-81 summarizes the analytical sampling data for  priority
and selected conventional and nonconventional pollutants.  Twelve
samples  of  sawing or grinding spent lubricants  were  collected
from  12  streams at thre:e plants.   Elevated  concentrations  of
nickel (116. mg/1),  copper (16.5 mg/1),  cobalt (3.4 mg/1), chro-
mium (24.0 mg/1),  oil arid grease (16,000 mg/1),  and TSS  (2,440
mg/1) were detected in the samples.

Nickel-Cobalt Sawing or (Grinding Rinse.   As discussed in Section
III,  a  rinsing step may be used following sawing or grinding to
remove  lubricants  dragged out on the product and to '. wash  away
sawing or grinding swarf,,   Water use,  wastewater discharge, and
current recycle practices corresponding to this waste stream  are
summarized in Table V-82.,

No samples of sawing or grinding rinsewater were collected during
the sampling program.   However,  to estimate pollutant loads for
this • program,  the  Agency assumed that this stream  would  have
wastewater   characteristics   similar  to  sawing  or   grinding
rinsewater in the zirconium-hafnium subcategory.   Because sawing
or  grinding,rinsing operations are similar among  subcategories,
the  pollutants  present  and the  mass  loadings  of  pollutants
present  are  expected  to be similar with respect to  the  major
metal formed.   That is, the mass loading of nickel and zirconium
in nickel sawing or grinding rinsewater is expected to be similar
to  the mass loading of zirconium and  nickel,  respectively,  in
zirconium  sawing  or  grinding  rinsewater.   Since  no  process
chemicals are added to the rinsewater, mass loadings of all other
pollutants are expected to be similar.

Nickel-Cobalt Steam Cleaning Condensate.  As discussed in Section
III, steam cleaning may be used to remove oil and grease from the
surface of metal.  Steam is condensed to water as it contacts the
surface of the relatively cooler metal.   Water  use,  wastewater
discharge,  and  current recycle practices corresponding to  this
waste stream are summarized in Table V-83.

At  proposal,  the  Agency  assumed that this stream  would  have
wastewater  characteristics  similar to rolling  contact  cooling
water in this subcategory.   After proposal,  this assumption was
confirmed by plant self-sampling data.

Nickel-Cobalt  Hydrostatic  Tube Testing and  Ultrasonic  Testing
Wastewater.   As  discussed  in  Section  III,  hydrostatic  tube
testing  and ultrasonic testing operations are used to  determine
the  integrity of tubes and to check metal parts  for  subsurface
imperfections.   Water  use,  wastewater discharge,  and  current


                               437

-------
recycle  practices corresponding to this waste stream are
rized in Table V-84.
sununa-
No  samples  of hydrostatic tube testing and  ultrasonic  testing
wastewater were collected during the sampling program.   However,
the Agency assumed that this stream would have wastewater charac-
teristics  similar  to  rolling  contact cooling  water  in  this
subcategory.   These two waste streams are generated in processes
in  which water,  without any added process  chemicals,  contacts
metal.   Therefore,  the pollutants present in each waste  stream
and the mass loading (mg/kkg) at which they are present should be
similar.

Nickel-Cobalt Dye Penetrant Testing Wastewater.   As discussed in
SectionIII,  testing -operations are used to  check  nonferrous
metals  parts for discontinuities that are open to the surface in
the  part  being tested.   Dye penetrant testing  operations  are
sources of wastewater because the parts must be rinsed  following
penetration  of the dye so that,  upon inspection,  dye will only
remain in the discontinuities.   Water use, wastewater discharge,
and current recycle practices corresponding to this waste  stream
are summarized in Table V-85.

Table  V-86  summarizes  the analytical data for  priority  metal
pollutants   and   selected  conventional   and   nonconventional
pollutants.  'Two samples of dye penetrant testing wastewater were
collected at two plants.

Nickel-Cobalt  Miscellaneous  Wastewater  Sources.   Several  low
volume  sources  of  wastewater  were reported  on  the  dcp  and
observed  during  the site and sampling  visits.   These  sources
include maintenance and cleanup.   The Agency has determined that
none of the plants reporting these specific water uses  discharge
these  wastewaters  to  surface water (directly  or  indirectly).
However, because the Agency believes that this type of low volume
periodic discharge occurs at most plants, the Agency is including
an allowance for the miscellaneous wastewater sources.

Nickel-Cobalt Degreasing Spent Solvents.  As described in Section
III,  solvent  cleaners are used to remove lubricants  (oils  and
greases)  applied  to  the surface of  nbnferrous  metals  during
mechanical  forming operations.   Basic solvent cleaning  methods
include  straight vapor degreasing,  immersion-vapor  degreasing,
spray-vapor degreasing,  ultrasonic vapor degreasing,  emulsified
solvent degreasing, and cold cleaning.

Solvents most commonly used for all types of vapor degreasing are
trichloroethylene,   1,1,1-trichloroethane,  methylene  chloride,
perchloroethylene,   and  various  chlorofluorocarbons.   Solvent
selection  depends  on the required process temperature  (solvent
boiling  point),  product dimension,  and metal  characteristics.
Contaminated  vapor degreasing solvents are frequently  recovered
by distillation.

Since none of the plants surveyed reported discharging the  spent
                               438

-------
degreasing solvents, no samples were collected.

Nickel-Cobalt;  Wet Air Pollution Control Slowdown.   As discussed
in Section III, wet air pollution control devices are required to
control  air  pollution  from  some  operations.   Scrubbers  are
frequently necessary over surface treatment operations to control
fumes and over shot blasting operations to control  particulates.
Water  use,  wastewater discharge,  and current recycle practices
corresponding to this waste stream are summarized in Table V-87.

Table  V-88 summarizes the analytical sampling data for  priority
and selected conventional and nonconventional pollutants.   Three
samples  of  wet air pollution control blowdown  were 'Collected.
Slowdown  from  a scrubber on a surface treatment  operation  was
sampled at two plants and on a shot blasting operation at another
plant.   Elevated concentrations of nickel,  copper (2.85  mg/1),
chromium and TSS (190 mg/1) were detected in the samples.

Nickel-Cobalt;Electrocoating Rinse.  As discussed in Section III,
products  are usually rinsed following electrocoating before they
are subsequently formed.   Water use,  wastewater discharge,  and
current recycle practices corresponding to this waste stream  are
summarized in Table V-89.

No samples of electrocoating rinsewater were collected during the
sampling  program.   However,  one commenter provided  sufficient
information  to calculate the mass loadings for three pollutants.
Elevated  concentrations of nickel (53.2  mg/1),  chromium  (1.22
mg/1), and copper (34.2 mg/1) were reported.  The calculated mass
loadings are 179,000 mg/kkg of nickel,  4,110 mg/kkg of chromium,
and  115,000 mg/kkg of copper.   The loadings of other pollutants
are expected to be similar to the loadings for alkaline  cleaning
rinsewater.       -

Nickel-Cobalt  Operations  Which Do Not Use Process  Water.    The
Agency  has  established no discharge  allowance  for  operations
which  do not generate process wastewater.   The following opera-
tions generate no process wastewater, either because they are dry
or because they use noncontact cooling water only:

     Powder Metallurgy Operations (Compacting, Sintering, Sizing)
     Powder Blending
     Powder Ball Milling
     Powder Attrition
     Powder Extrusion     '         -     -
     Hot Isostatic Pressing .
     Grit, Sand and Shot Blasting
     Welding
     Plasma Torch Cutting
     Gas Cleaning
     Coil Buildup, Coiling
     Straightening
     Electroflux Remelting.

Precious Metals Forming Subcategory
                               439

-------
Precious Metals Rolling Spent Neat Oils.  As discussed in Section
III,  the rolling of precious metals products may require the use
of  mineral oil lubricants.   The oils are usually recycled  with
in-line filtration and periodically disposed of by sale to an oil
reclaimer or by incineration.   Water use,  wastewater discharge,
and current recycle practices corresponding to this waste  stream
are summarized in Table V-90.

Since  none  of  the  plants surveyed  reported  discharging  the
rolling  spent neat oils,  no samples of this waste  stream  were
collected.

Precious Metals Rolling Spent Emulsions.  As discussed in Section
III,  oil-water  emulsions  are  used in  rolling  operations  as
coolants  and lubricants.   Rolling emulsions are typically recy-
cled  using in-line filtration with periodic batch  discharge  of
the  recycled  emulsion as it loses its  lubricating  properties.
Water  use/  wastewater discharge,  and current recycle practices
corresponding to this waste stream are summarized in Table V-91.

Table  V-92 summarizes the analytical sampling data for  priority
and selected conventional and nonconventional pollutants.   Three
samples  of  rolling  spent emulsion were  collected  from  three
streams at two plants.   Elevated concentrations of copper  (25.0
mg/1),  zinc  (6.00 mg/1),  silver (0.130 mg/1),  oil and  grease
(1,500 mg/1), and TSS (500 mg/1) were detected in the samples.

Precious Metals Drawing Spent Neat Oils.  As discussed in Section
III,  oil-based  lubricants may be required in draws which have a
high  reduction in diameter.'  Drawing oils are usually  recycled
until  their lubricating properties are  exhausted.   Water  use,
wastewater discharge,' and current recycle practices corresponding
to this waste stream are summarized in Table V-93.

Since  none  of  the  plants surveyed  reported  discharging  the
drawing spent neat oils, no samples were collected.

Precious Metals Drawing Spent Emulsions.  As discussed in Section
III,  oil-water emulsions may be used as coolants and  lubricants
in  drawing.   The drawing emulsions are frequently recycled  and
batch  discharged periodically after their lubricating properties
are  exhausted.   Water use,  wastewater discharge,  and  current
recycle  practices corresponding to this waste stream are  summa-
rized in Table V-94.

Table  V-95 summarizes the analytical sampling data for  priority
and  selected conventional and nonconventional  pollutants.   One
sample  of  drawing spent emulsions was collected at  one  plant.
Elevated concentrations of copper (46.4 mg/1),  zinc (5.18 mg/1),
lead (1.05 mg/1),  and oil and grease (33,000 mg/1) were detected
in the sample.
Precious  Metals Drawing Spent Soa
Section  III,
_ 	 	 	 Solutions.   As discussed  in
soap solutions can be used as drawing  lubricants.
                               440

-------
The  drawing soap solutions may be recycled and batch  discharged
periodically  after their lubricating properties  are  exhausted.
Water  use,  wastewater discharge,  and current recycle practices
corresponding to this waste stream are summarized in Table V-96.

At  proposal,  the  Agency assumed that this  stream  would  have
wastewater  characteristics similar to rolling spent emulsions in
this subcategory.   After proposal, this assumption was confirmed
by plant self-sampling data.

Precious  Metals Metal Powder Production Atomization  Wastewater.
As  discussed in Section III,  metal powder is commonly  produced
through  wet  atomization. of a molten metal.   Water  is  removed
after  the  atomization step,  commonly by  settling,  then  dis-
charged.   Water use,  wastewater discharge,  and current recycle
practices  corresponding to this waste stream are  summcirized  in
Table V-97.

No samples of metal powder production atomization wastewater were
collected  during  the sampling  program.   However,  the  Agency
believes  that  this stream will have wastewater  characteristics
similar  to shot casting contact cooling water in  this  subcate-
gory.   These  two waste streams are generated by using water  to
cool  molten metal.   Therefore,  the pollutants present in  each
waste  stream  and  the mass loading (mg/kkg) at which  they  are
present should be similar.

Precious Metals Direct Chill Casting Contact Cooling  Water.   As
discussed  in Section III,  contact cooling water is a  necessary
part of direct chill casting.   The cooling water may be contami-
nated  by  lubricants applied to the mold before and  during  the
casting process.   Water use,  wastewater discharge,  and current
recycle  practices corresponding to this waste stream are  summa-
rized in Table V-98.

Precious Metals Shot Casting Contact Cooling Water.  As discussed
in  Section III,  during shot casting,  a tank of contact cooling
water,  either  stagnant or circulating,  is necessary for  quick
quenching of .cast shot.  ' Water use,  wastewater  discharge,-  and
current  recycle practices corresponding to this waste stream are
summarized in, Table V-99.

Table V-100 summarizes the analytical sampling data for  priority
and  selected conventional and nonconventional  pollutants.   Two
samples of shot casting contact cooling water were collected from
one  stream  at one plant.   Elevated concentrations  of  cadmium
(9.88 mg/1),  copper (0.600 mg/1),  zinc (5.66 mg/1), and oil and
grease (54 mg/1) were detected in the samples.

Precious  Metals  Stationary Casting Contact Cooling  Water.   As
discussed in' Section III/  stationary casting of metal ingots  is
practiced  at many nonfeirrous metals forming plants.   Lubricants
and cooling water are usually not required,  however,  two of the
plants  surveyed  reported the use and  discharge  of  stationary
casting contact cooling water. ,  Water use, wastewater discharge,


                         :      441

-------
and  current recycle practices corresponding to this waste stream
are summarized in Table V-101.

No  samples  of  stationary casting contact  cooling  water  were
collected  during  the sampling  program.   However,  the  Agency
assumed  that this stream would have  wastewater  characteristics
similar to semi-continuous and continuous casting contact cooling
water in this subcategory.  These two waste streams are generated
oy using water, without additives, to cool hot metal.  Therefore,
the  pollutants present in each waste stream and the mass loading
at which they are present should be similar.

Precious  Metals Semi-Continuous and Continuous  Casting  Contact
Cooling~Water.   As discussed in Section III, a number of differ-
ent  continuous casting .processes are currently being used in the
precious  metals industry.   The use of continuous casting  tech-
niques  has been found to significantly reduce or  eliminate  the
use  of  contact cooling water and oil  lubricants.   Water  use,
wastewater discharge, and current recycle practices corresponding
to this waste stream are summarized in Table V-102.

Table  V-103 summarizes the analytical sampling data for priority
and  selected conventional and nonconventional  pollutants.   Two
samples of semi-continuous and continuous casting contact cooling
water  were collected from two streams at two  plants.   Elevated
concentrations of copper, cyanide (0.50 mg/1), oil and grease and
TSS were detected in the samples.

Precious  Metals Heat Treatment Contact Cooling Water.   As  dis-
cussed in Section III,  contact cooling water is used to obtain a
controlled  cooling  rate following solution heat  treatment  and
annealing.   Water use, wastewater discharge, and current recycle
practices  corresponding to this waste stream are  summarized  in
Table V-104.

Precious  Metals Surface Treatment Spent Baths.   As discussed in
Section III, a number of chemical treatments may be applied after
the forming of precious metals products.   The surface  treatment
baths  must be periodically discharged after their properties are
exhausted.   Water use, wastewater discharge, and current recycle
practices  corresponding to this waste stream are  summarized  in
Table V-105.

Precious Metals Surface Treatment Rinse.  As discussed in Section
III, rinsing follows the surface treatment process to prevent the
solution  from  affecting  the surface of the  metal  beyond  the
desired  amount.   Water use,  wastewater discharge,  and current
recycle   practices  corresponding  to  this  waste  stream   are
summarized in Table V-106.

Table V-107 summarizes the analytical sampling data for  priority
and selected conventional and nonconventional pollutants.   Seven
samples  of surface treatment rinsewater were collected from four
streams  at  three plants.   Elevated concentrations  of  cadmium
(11.1 mg/1), copper (60.6 mg/1), silver (6.70 mg/1), zinc and TSS
                               442

-------
(3,000 mg/1) were detected in the samples.

Precious Metals Alkaline Cleaning Spent Baths.   As discussed  in
Section  III,  alkaline  cleaners  are formulations  of  alkaline
salts,  water,  and surfactants.   Spent solutions are discharged
from  alkaline  cleaning  processes after  their  properties  are
exhausted.   Water use/ wastewater discharge, and current recycle
practices  corresponding to this waste stream are  summarized  in
Table V-108.!            ;             '  "•   •   .

Precious Metals Alkaline Cleaning Rinse.  As discussed in Section
III,   following  alkaline  treating,  metal  parts  are  rinsed.
Rinses  are discharged from alkaline cleaning  processes.   Water
use,  wastewater discharge,  and current recycle practices corre-
sponding to this waste stream are summarized in Table V-109.

No  samples of alkaline cleaning rinsewater were collected during
the  sampling program.   However,  the Agency assumed  that  this
stream  would have wastewater characteristics similar to alkaline
cleaning rinsewater in the nickel-cobalt subcategory.   These two
waste streams are generated by.identical physical processes which
use similar process chemicals.  The only difference should be the
metals present.   The mass loading of precious metals in precious
metals alkaline cleaning rinsewater should be similar to the mass
loading  of nickel in nickel alkaline  cleaning  rinsewater,  and
vice versa.   Also, chromium should not be present in significant
amounts.   The other pollutants present in each waste stream, and
the mass loading at which they are present, should be similar,

Precious  Metals  Alkaline Cleaning  Prebonding  Wastewater.   As
discussed  in  Section III,  prior to bonding  (cladding),  metal
surfaces  must be cleaned in order to obtain a  good  bond.   The
main  source of process water in metal cladding operations is  in
cleaning the metal surfaces prior to bonding.   Acid, caustic, or
detergent  cleaning can be performed depending on the metal type.
For  small  batch  operations,  the cleaning  steps  Ccin  involve
dipping the metal into small cleaning bath tanks and hand rinsing
the metal in a sink.  Fo>r larger continuous operations, the metal
may be cleaned in a power scrubline.  In a typical scrubline, the
strip .passes through a detergent bath,  spray rinse,  acid  bath,
spray rinse,  rotating abrasive scrub brushes, and a final rinse.
The  metal  may then pass through a heated drying chamber or  may
air dry.   Water use,  wastewater discharge,  and current recycle
practices  corresponding to this waste stream are  summarized  in
Table V-110.

Table  V-lll summarizes the analytical sampling data for priority
and selected conventional and nonconventional pollutants.   Eight
samples  of  prebonding cleaning wastewater were  collected  from
three streams at two plants.   Elevated concentrations of  silver
(0.100 mg/1), zinc  (2.32 mg/1), copper (5.95 mg/1), cyanide (0.28
mg/1), nickel  (3.60 mg/1), oil and grease  (16 mg/1), and TSS (400
mg/1).were detected in the samples.

Precious Metals Tumbling or Burnishing Wastewater.   As discussed


                               443

-------
in  Section  III,  tumbling is a controlled method of  processing
parts to remove burrs,  scale,  flash,  and oxides as well as  to
improve surface finish of formed metal parts.   Burnishing is  the
process  of finish sizing or smooth finishing a workpiece  (previ-
ously machined or ground) by displacement rather than removal, of
minute  surface  irregularities.   Water is  used  to  facilitate
tumbling and burnishing.   Water use,  wastewater discharge,   and
current  recycle practices corresponding to this waste stream  are
summarized in Table V-112.

Table V-113 summarizes the analytical sampling data for  priority
and  selected conventional and nonconventional pollutants.   Four
samples of tumbling wastewater were collected from two streams at
two plants.  Elevated concentrations of silver (0.220 mg/1), lead
(1.85 mg/1),  zinc (3.16 mg/1),  iron (7,850 mg/1),  copper  (142
mg/1),  nickel (3.25 mg/1),  chromium (3.18 mg/1), oil and grease
(40 mg/1), and TSS (110 mg/1) were detected in the samples.

Precious Metals Sawing or Grinding Spent Neat Oils.  As discussed
inSection III,  sawing or grinding operations may use  mineral-
based  oils or heavy grease as the lubricant required to minimize
friction and act as a coolant.   Normally,  cutting oils are   not
discharged as a wastewater stream.  Water use, wastewater dis
charge, and current recycle practices corresponding to this waste
stream are summarized in Table V-114.

Since none of the plants surveyed reported discharging the sawing
or grinding spent neat oils, no samples were collected.

Precious Metals Sawing or Grinding Spent Emulsions.  As discussed
InSection  III,  the  rolls used in rolling  operations  obtain
surface abrasions after repeated use.   The rolls must be surface
ground in order to obtain a smooth rolling surface.'   The  rolled
product  will  not be formed properly if the rolls are  not  ade-
quately  smooth.   Roll  grinding and other sawing  and  grinding
operations generally require a lubricant to minimize friction and
act as a coolant.  Oil-water emulsions are commonly used for this
purpose.   The  emulsions  are typically recycled  using  in-line
filtration  and batch discharged periodically after their  lubri-
cating  properties  are exhausted.   Water use,  wastewater  dis-
charge, and current recycle practices corresponding to this waste
stream are summarized in Table V-115.

Table V-116 summarizes the analytical sampling data for  priority
and  selected  conventional and  nonconventional  pollutants.   A
sample  of  roll  grinding spent emulsions was collected  at  one
plant.   Elevated concentrations of zinc (0.920  mg/1),  chromium
(0.240 mg/1),  and oil and grease (500 mg/1) were detected in the
sample.

Precious  Metals  Pressure  Bonding Contact  Cooling  Water.    As
discussed in Section III,   metals can be bonded together  through
the  use  of pressure applied onto the  desired  forms.   Cooling
water  may  be applied after the bonding operation to  facilitate
handling of the bonded product.  Water use,  wastewater discharge,
                               444

-------
and current recycle practices corresponding to this waste  stream
are summarized in Table V-117.

Table  V-118 summarizes the analytical sampling data for priority
and  selected conventional and nonconventional  pollutants.   One
sample of pressure bonding contact cooling water was collected at
one  plant.   Elevated  concentrations of zinc  (3.42  mg/1)  and
copper (7.85 mg/1) were detected in the sample.

Precious  Metals  Degreasing  Spent Solvents.   As  described  in
Section III, solvent cleaners are used to remove lubricants (oils
and  greases) applied to the surface of nonferrous metals  during
mechanical  forming operations.   Basic solvent cleaning  methods
include  straight vapor degreasing,  immersion-vapor  degreasing,
spray-vapor degreasing,  ultrasonic vapor degreasing,  emulsified
solvent degreasing, and cold cleaning.

Solvents most commonly used for all types of vapor degreasing are
trichloroethylene,   1,1,1-trichloroethane,  methylene  chloride,
perchloroethylene,   and  various  chlorofluorocarbons.   Solvent
selection  depends on the required process  temperature  (solvent
boiling point), product dimension, and metal characteristics.
Contaminated  vapor degreasing solvents are frequently  recovered
by distillation.

Since  none  of  the plants surveyed reported  discharging  spent
degreasing solvents, no samples were collected.

Precious Metals Wet Air Pollution Control Slowdown.  As discussed
in Section III,  wet air pollution control devices are needed  to
control  air  pollution  from  some  operations.   For  instance,
scrubbers  may be required over casting operations.   Water  use,
wastewater discharge, and current recycle practices corresponding
to this waste stream are summarized in Table V-119.

No  samples of wet air pollution control blowdowh were  collected
during  the sampling program.   However,  the Agency assumed that
this stream would have wastewater characteristics similar to shot
casting  contact cooling water in this subcategory.   The  pollu-
tants  in each of these waste streams derive from the contact  of
the water with particles of metal,  so the pollutants present are
expected  to  be similar.   However,  because the  air  pollution
control  device is designed to capture small particles and  gases
(dust and fumes) generated during the casting process,  the  mass
loadings of total suspended solids and total dissolved solids are
expected  to be higher in wet air pollution control blowdown than
in shot casting contact cooling water.

Precious Metals Operations Which Do Not Use Process  Water.   The
Agency  has not established a discharge allowance for  operations
which . do not generate process wastewater.   The following opera-
tions  generate no process wastewater,  either because  they  use
only  noncontact  cooling water or because they use no  water  at
all:
                               445

-------
     Forging, Swaging
     Punching, Stamping
     Welding
     Soldering
     Melting
     Screening
     Sawing
     Slitting
     Metal Powder Production.

Refractory Metals Forming Subcategory

Refractory  Metals  Rolling  Spent Neat Oils  and  Graphite-Based
Lubricants.   As discussed in Section III, the rolling of refrac-
tory metal products typically requires the use of mineral oil  or
graphite-based  lubricants.   The oils are usually recycled  with
in-line filtration and periodically disposed of by sale to an oil
reclaimer  or by incineration.   Because discharge of this stream
is  not  practiced,  flow data were not available  for  analysis.
Only  one plant surveyed reported using neat oil  rolling  lubri-
cants,  but  this plant did not report the quantity of  lubricant
used.   Water  use,  wastewater  discharge,  and current  recycle
practices  corresponding to this waste stream are  summarized  in
Table V-120.

Since  none  of  the  plants surveyed  reported  discharging  the
rolling spent neat oils or graphite-based lubricants,  no samples
were collected.

Refractory  Metals  Rolling Spent  Emulsions.   As  discussed  in
Section  III,  oil-water emulsions are used in rolling operations
as  coolants  and lubricants.   Rolling emulsions  are  typically
recycled   with   in-line   filtration   and   batch   discharged
periodically when the lubricating properties of the emulsions are
exhausted.   Water use, wastewater discharge, and current recycle
practices  corresponding to this waste stream are  summarized  in
Table V-121.

No  samples of rolling spent emulsions were collected during  the
sampling program.   However,  the Agency assumed that this stream
would  have  wastewater characteristics similar to  nickel-cobalt
rolling spent emulsions.   These two waste streams are  generated
by  identical physical processes which use similar process chemi-
cals.  The only difference between the wastewater characteristics
of  the  two  streams should be the  metals  present.   The  mass
loading  (mg/kkg)  of refractory metals rolling  spent  emulsions
should be similar to the mass loading of nickel in nickel rolling
spent emulsions,  and vice versa.   In addition, the mass loading
of  chromium in refractory metals rolling spent emulsions  should
be  insignificant  because refractory metals are  seldom  alloyed
with chromium.   The other pollutants in each waste  stream,  and
the mass loading at which they are present, should be similar.
Refractory  Metals  Drawing Spent Lubricants.   As  discussed
Section  III,  a  wide variety of drawing lubricants are used
in
in
                               446

-------
order to ensure uniform drawing temperatures and avoid  excessive
wear  on the dies and mandrels.   Drawing lubricants are  usually
recycled  until  no  longer  effective.   Water  use,  wastewater
discharge,  and  current recycle practices corresponding to  this
waste stream are summarized in Table V-122.
Since  none  of  the  plants surveyed  reported  discharging
drawing spent1 lubricants, no samples were collected.
the
Refractory  Metals Extrusion Spent Lubricants.   As discussed  in
Section III,  the extrusion process requires the use of a  lubri-
cant  to  prevent  adhesion  of the metal to the  die  and  ingot
container walls.   Water .use,  wastewater discharge,  and current
recycle  practices corresponding to this waste stream are  summa-
rized in Table V-123.     ;

Since  none  of  the plants  surveyed  reported  discharging  the
extrusion spent lubricants, no samples were collected.


Refractory  Metals Extrusion Press Hydraulic Fluid  Leakage.   As
discussed  in  Section III,  due to the large force applied by  a
hydraulic  press,  some hydraulic fluid leakage  is  unavoidable.
Water  use,  wastewater discharge,  and current recycle practices
corresponding to this waste stream are summarized in Table V-124.

Table V-125 summarizes the analytical sampling data for  priority
and  selected conventional and nonconventional  pollutants.   One
sample  of extrusion press; hydraulic fluid leakage was  collected
during  the sampling program.   Elevated concentrations of copper
(21 mg/1),  molybdenum (20 mg/1),  oil and grease (44,000  mg/1),
and  total  suspended solids (19,000 mg/1) were detected  in  the
sample.

Refractory  Metals  Forging Spent Lubricants.   As  discussed  in
Section  III,  proper  lubrication  of the dies is  essential  in
forging refractory metals.:   Of the plants surveyed reporting the
use. of forging lubricants,  all reported total consumption due to
evaporation and drag-out. '  Water use,  wastewater discharge, and
current recycle practices corresponding to this waste stream  are
summarized in Table V-126.
Since  none  of  the  plants surveyed  reported  discharging
forging spent lubricants,  no samples were collected.
the
Refractory Metals Forging Contact Cooling Water.   As discussed in
Section III,  heat treatment is frequently used after forging  to
attain  the  desired mechanical properties in the  forged  metal.
Contact  cooling water may be used to cool the forged metal at  a
controlled  rate  after heett treatment.    Water  use,  wastewater
discharge/  and  current recycle practices corresponding to  this
waste stream are summarized in Table V-127.

At  proposal,  the  Agency assumed that  this  stream  would  have
wastewater  characteristics  similar to   nickel-cobalt  extrusion
                               447

-------
press  and solution heat treatment contact cooling water.   These
two  waste streams are generated by using  water,  without  addi-
tives/  to  cool  hot  metal.   The only difference  between  the
wastewater  characteristics  of  the two streams  should  be  the
metals present.   The mass loading (mg/kkg) of refractory  metals
in  refractory  metals  forging contact cooling water  should  be
similar  to the mass loading of nickel in nickel extrusion  press
and  solution  heat treatment contact  cooling  water,  and  vice
versa.   Also,  the mass loading of chromium should be insignifi-
cant  because refractory metals are seldom alloyed with chromium.
The other pollutants in each waste stream,  and the mass  loading
at  which they are present,  should be similar.   After proposal,
these assumptions were confirmed by plant self-sampling data.

Refractory  Metals Metal Powder Production Wastewater.   As  dis-
cussed  in Section III,  refractory metal powders are  frequently
produced  by  mechanical reduction.   The most common  pieces  of
mechanical  reduction  equipment are ball  mills,  vortex  mills,
hammer mills, disc mills, and roll mills.  Water or other liquids
may  be  used to aid in the milling operation  or  to  facilitate
handling  after powder is produced.   Water use,  wastewater dis-
charge, and current recycle practices corresponding to this waste
stream are summarized in Table V-128.                          :

At  proposal,  the  Agency assumed that this  stream  would  have
wastewater  characteristics  similar  to tumbling  or  burnishing
wastewater in this subcategory.   After proposal, this assumption
was confirmed by plant self-sampling data.

Refractory Metals Metal Powder Production Floor Wash  Wastewater.
As  discussed in Section III,  floor washing may be necessary  in
metal  powder  production  areas to keep to  a  minimum  airborne
particles  and to keep powder dust off the floor so that it  does
not become slippery and a safety hazard.   Water use,  wastewater
discharge,  and  current recycle practices corresponding to  this
waste stream are summarized in Table V-129.

No  samples  of  metal powder production floor  wash  water  were
collected  during  the sampling  program.   However,  the  Agency
assumed  that  this stream would have wastewater  characteristics
similar  to  area  cleaning wastewater  in  the  uranium  forming
subcategory.   These  two  waste streams are generated  by  plant
cleanups.  The only difference should be the metals present.  The
mass  loading (mg/kkg) of refractory metals in refractory  metals
metal powder production floor wash water should be similar to the
mass loading of uranium in uranium area cleaning wastewater,  and
vice  versa.   The other pollutants present in each waste stream,
and the mass loading at which they are present,  should be  simi-
lar.

Refractory  Metals  Metal Powder Pressing Spent  Lubricants.   As
discussed in Section III,  a forming medium may be used to lubri-
cate  the pressing of green shapes,  which are subsequently  sin-
tered.   Lubricants  may be recycled and lost  through  drag-out.
Water  use,  wastewater discharge,  and current recycle practices
                               448

-------
corresponding to this waste stream are summarized in Table V-130.

Since none of . the plants surveyed reported discharging the  metal
powder pressing spent lubricants, no samples were collected.

Refractory Metals Surface Treatment Spent Baths.  As discussed in
Section III, a number of :chemical treatments may be applied after
the forming of refractory metal products.   The surface treatment
baths  must be periodically discharged after their properties are
exhausted.   Water use, wastewater discharge, and current recycle
practices  corresponding to this waste stream are  summarized  in
Table V-131.

Table  V-132 summarizes the analytical sampling data for priority
and  selected conventional and nonconventional  pollutants.   One
sample of surface treatment spent baths was collected.   Elevated
concentrations of nickel (12.4 mg/1),  copper (6.3 mg/1),  silver
(6.1 mg/1), and TSS (140 mg/1) were detected in the sample.

Refractory  Metals  Surface Treatment  Rinse.   As  discussed  in
Section  III,  rinsing following the surface treatment process to
prevent  the  solution from affecting the surface  of  the  metal
beyond the desired amount.   Water use, wastewater discharge, and
current  recycle practices corresponding to this waste stream are
summarized in Table V-133.         ''.    •

Table V-134 summarizes the analytical sampling data for  priority
and  selected conventional! and nonconventional pollutants.   Five
samples of surface treatment rinsewater were collected from  five
streams at five plants.   Elevated concentrations of nickel (10.2
mg/1),  columbium,   tantalum,  tungsten  and TSS (140 mg/1) were
detected in the samples.,

Refractory Metals Alkaline Cleaning Spent Baths.  As discussed in
Section  III,  alkaline  cleaners are  formulations  of  alkaline
salts,  water,  and surfactants.   Spent solutions are discharged
from  alkaline cleaning processes.   Water use,  wastewater  dis-
charge, and current recycle practices corresponding to this waste
stream are summarized in Table V-135.

Table  V-136: summarizes the analytical sampling data for priority
and  .selected conventional and nonconventional  pollutants.   One
sample  of  alkaline cleaning spent baths was  collected  at  one
plant.   Elevated  concentrations of lead (9.9  mg/1),  columbium
(865 mg/1), and tantalum (585 mg/1) were detected in the sample.

Refractory  Metals  Alkaline  Cleaning Rinse.   As  discussed  in
Section III,' following alkaline treating, metal parts are rinsed.
Rinses  are discharged from alkaline cleaning  processes.   Water
use,  wastewater discharge,  and current recycle practices corre-
sponding to this waste stream are summarized in Table V-137.

No samples of alkaline cleaning rinsewater were collected  during
the  sampling  program.   However,  the Agency assumed that  this
stream would have wastewater characteristics similar to  alkaline
                               449

-------
cleaning rinsewater in the nickel-cobalt subcategory.   These two
waste  streams  are generated by using water to  remove  alkaline
cleaning  solutions  from  cleaned metal.   The  only  difference
between the wastewater characteristics of the two streams  should
be  the metals present.   The mass loading (mg/kkg) of refractory
metals  in refractory metals alkaline cleaning rinsewater  should
be  similar  to  the mass loading of nickel  in  nickel  alkaline
cleaning rinsewater,  and vice versa.   Also, the mass loading of
chromium  should be insignificant because refractory  metals  are
seldom alloyed with chromium.  The other pollutants in each waste
stream, and the mass loading at which they are present, should be
similar.

Refractory  Metals  Molten  Salt  Rinsewater.   As  discussed,  in
Section  III,  when molten salt baths are used to descale refrac-
tory metal alloys,  they are generally followed by a water quench
and rinse step.   Water use,  wastewater discharge,  and  current
recycle  practices corresponding to this waste stream are  summa-
rized in Table V-138.

Table  V-139 summarizes the analytical sampling data for priority
and  selected conventional and nonconventional  pollutants.   Six
samples  of  molten  salt rinsewater  were  collected  from  four
streams  at  three plants.   Elevated concentrations of  tantalum
(2.5 mg/1),  columbium (2.3 mg/1), chromium (0.400 mg/1), and TSS
(540 mg/1) were detected in the samples.

Refractory  Metals Tumbling or Burnishing  Wastewater.   As  dis-
cussed  in Section III,  tumbling is a controlled method of  pro-
cessing parts to remove burrs,  scale,  flash, and oxides as well
as  to  improve  surface finish.   Burnishing is the  process  of
finish  sizing  or  smooth  finishing  a  workpiece   (previously
machined  or  ground) by displacement,  rather than  removal,  of
minute  surface  irregularities.   Water is  used  to  facilitate
tumbling and burnishing.   Water use,  wastewater discharge,  and
current  recycle practices corresponding to this waste stream are
summarized in Table V-140.

Table V-141 summarizes the analytical sampling data for  priority
and  selected conventional and nonconventional  pollutants.   Six
samples  of tumbling,  burnishing wastewater were collected  from
four  streams at two plants.   Elevated concentrations of  copper
lead,  nickel  (103  mg/1),  tungsten and TSS (2,700  mg/1)  were
detected in the samples.

Refractory  Metals Sawing or Grinding Spent Neat Oils.   As  dis-
cussed  in  Section III,  sawing or grinding operations  may  use
mineral-based  oils or heavy grease as the lubricant required  to
minimize friction arid act as a coolant.   Normally,  cutting oils
are not discharged as a wastewater stream.  Water use, wastewater
discharge,  and  current recycle practices corresponding to  this
waste stream are summarized in Table V-142.

Sine-  none  of  the plants surveyed reported  discharging  spent
sawing or grinding neat oils, no samples were collected.        '
                               450

-------
Refractory  Metals Sawing or Grinding Spent Emulsions.   As  dis-
cussed  in Section III,  sawing or grinding operations  generally
require  a lubricant in order to minimize friction and act  as  a
coolant.   Oil-water  emulsions are frequently used to  lubricate
sawing  and  grinding  operations.   The  emulsions  are  usually
recycled  with  in-line  filtration  to remove  swarf  and  batch
discharged  periodically  as  their  lubricating  properties  are
exhausted.   Water use, wastewater discharge, and current recycle
practices  corresponding to this waste stream are  summarized  in
Table V-143.

Table  V-144  summarizes the analytical data for  priority  metal
pollutants   and   selected  conventional   and   nonconverttional
pollutants.   Six  samples of sawing or grinding spent  emulsions
were collected at five plants.

Refractory  Metals Sawing or Grinding Contact Cooling Water.   As
discussed in Section III,  a liquid which functions as  lubricant
and  coolant  is  frequently needed during sawing  and  grinding.
Water  is  one  type of liquid which may  be  used.   Water  use,
wastewater discharge, and current recycle practices corresponding
to this waste; stream are summarized in-Table V-145.

Table V-146 summarizes the analytical sampling data for  priority
and  selected conventional and nonconventional  pollutants.   Two
samples  of  sawing or grinding contact cooling water  were  col-
lected  from two streams at two plants.   Elevated concentrations
of molybdenum (5,470 mg/1),  iron (13.0 mg/1), and TSS (310 mg/1)
were detected in the samples.

Refractory  Metals  Sawing or Grinding Rinse.   As  discussed  in
Section III,  the formed metals may be rinsed following sawing or
grinding to remove the lubricants and saw chips for reprocessing.
Water use,  wastewater discharge,  and current recycle  practices
corresponding to this waste stream are summarized in Table V-147.

At  proposal,  the  Agency  assumed that this stream  would  have
wastewater characteristics similar to sawing or grinding  contact
cooling water in this subcategory.   After proposal, this assump-
tion was confirmed by plant self-sampling data.

Refractory Metals Dye Penetrant Testing Wastewater.  As described
in  Section III,  testing operations are used to check nonferrous
metals parts for discontinuities that are open to the surface  in
the  part  being tested.   Dye penetrant testing  operations  are
sources  of wastewater because the parts must be rinsed following
penetration of the dye so that,  upon inspection,  dye will  only
remain in the discontinuities.  Water use, wastewater discharge,
and  current recycle practices corresponding to this waste stream
are summarized in Table V-148.

Table V-149 summarizes the analytical sampling data for  priority
and  selected conventional and nonconventional  pollutants.   One
sample  of dye penetrant testing wastewater was collected  during
                               451

-------
the  sampling  program.   Elevated concentrations of nickel   (1.6
mg/1),  oil and grease  (72 mg/1), and TSS  (22 mg/1) were detected
in the sample.

Refractory Metals Equipment Cleaning Wastewater.  As discussed in
Section III,  extrusion and forging equipment may be periodically
cleaned  in  order to prevent the excessive build-up of  oil  and
grease on the dies.  Water use, wastewater discharge, and current
recycle  practices corresponding to this waste stream are  summa-
rized in Table V-150.

Table  V-151  summarizes the analytical data for  priority  metal
pollutants   and   selected  conventional   and   nonconventional
pollutants.   Three samples of equipment cleaning wastewater were
collected at two plants.

Refractory Metals Miscellaneous Wastewater Sources.  As discussed
in  Section III,  several low volume sources of  wastewater  were
reported  on  the dcps and observed during the site and  sampling
visits.   These  sources include wastewater from a  post-oil  dip
coating  rinse,  a  quench  of extrusion tools,  and  spent  roll
grinding emulsions.   Because they generally represent low volume
periodic  discharges  applicable to most plants,  the  Agency  is
including an allowance for all of these streams under the miscel-
laneous wastewater sources waste stream.   Water use,  wastewater
discharge,  and  current recycle practices corresponding to  this
waste stream are summarized in Table V-152.

No  samples  of miscellaneous wastewater sources  were  collected
during the sampling program.   However,  the Agency believes that
this  stream  will  have wastewater  characteristics  similar  to
forging  contact cooling water in the nickel-cobalt  subcategory.
However,  the mass loading (mg/kkg) of oil and grease is expected
to  be higher,  while the mass loading of TSS is expected  to  be
lower in miscellaneous wastewater sources than in forging contact
cooling water.   In addition, the metals present in the two waste
streams  are  expected to differ.   The mass loading (mg/kkg)  of
refractory  metals in refractory metals miscellaneous  wastewater
sources should be similar to the mass loading of nickel in nickel
forging contact cooling water,  and vice versa.   Also,  the mass
loading  of chromium should be insignificant  because  refractory
metals are seldom alloyed with chromium.  The other pollutants in
each  waste stream,  and the mass loading at which they are pres-
ent,  with  the exception of TSS and oil and  grease,  should  be
similar.

Refractory  Metals  Degreasing Spent Solvents.    As described  in
Section III, solvent cleaners are used to remove lubricants (oils
and  greases)  applied to the surface of nonferrous metals  during
mechanical  forming operations.   Basic solvent cleaning  methods
include  straight vapor degreasing,  immersion-vapor  degreasing,
spray-vapor degreasing,  ultrasonic vapor degreasing,  emulsified
solvent degreasing, and cold cleaning.

Solvents most commonly used for all types of vapor degreasing are
                               452

-------
trichloroethylene,   1,1,1-trichloroethane,  methylene  chloride,
perchloroethylene,   and  various  chlorofluprocarbons.   Solvent
selection  depends on the required process  temperature   (solvent
boiling  point),  product dimension,  and metal  characteristics.
Contaminated  vapor degreasing solvents are frequently  recovered
by distillation.

Since  none  of  the plants surveyed reported  discharging  spent
degreasing solvents, no samples were collected.
Refractory
cussed  in
Metals Wet Air Pollution Control Slowdown.   As  dis-
                                         devices  are
                                              quality
            Section III,  wet air pollution control
needed to accompany some operations in order to meet air
standards.   Water use, wastewater discharge, and current recycle
practices  corresponding  to this waste stream are summarized  in
Table V-153.
Table V-1.54 summarizes the analytical sampling data for  priority
and  selected conventional and nonconventional  pollutants.   Two
samples of wet air pollution control blowdown were collected from
two streams at two plants.  Elevated concentrations of lead (0.16
mg/1) and TSS (150 mg/1) were detected in the samples.

Refractory Metals Operations Which Do Not Use Process Water.  The
Agency  has not established a discharge allowance for  operations
which  do not generate process wastewater.   The following opera-
tions  generate  no process wastewater,  because  they  use  only
noncontact cooling water or because they use no water at all:

     Powder Metallurgy Operations (Pressing, Sintering)
     Annealing             .  •
     Soldering
     Welding
     Screening
     Blending  ;
     Straightening
     Blasting.

Titanium Forming Subcategory

Titanium  Rolling Spent Neat Oils.   As discussed in Section III,
the  rolling of titanium products typically requires the  use  of
mineral  oil lubricants.   The oils are usually recycled with in-
line  filtration, and periodically disposed of by sale to  an  oil
reclaimer  or by incineration.    Because discharge of this stream
is not practiced,  limited flow data were available for analysis.
Water use,  wastewater discharge,  and current recycle  practices
corresponding to this waste stream are, summarized in Table V-155.

Since  none  of  the  plants surveyed  reported  discharging  the
rolling  spent neat oils,  no samples of this waste  stream  were
collected.

Titanium Rolling Contact Cooling Water.   As discussed in Section
III,  a  liquid  which  functions as a lubricant and  coolant  is
                             •.  453

-------
necessary during rolling to prevent excessive wear on the  rolls,
to  prevent  adhesion of metal to the rolls,  and to  maintain  a
suitable  and uniform rolling temperature.   Water is one type of
liquid which may be used.   Water use,  wastewater discharge, and
current recycle practices corresponding to this waste stream  are
summarized in Table V-156.

Titanium  Drawing Spent Neat Oils.   As discussed in Section III,
oil-based  lubricants may be required in draws which have a  high
reduction in diameter.   Drawing oils are usually recycled  until
their  lubricating properties are exhausted.   Water use,  waste-
water discharge,  and current recycle practices corresponding  to
this waste stream are summarized in Table V-157.

Since  none  of  the  'plants surveyed  reported  discharging  the
drawing spent neat oils, no samples were collected.

Titanium Extrusion Spent Neat Oils.  As discussed in Section III,
oil-based  lubricants may be required in extrusions which have  a
high reduction in diameter.  Water use, wastewater discharge, and
current recycle practices corresponding to this waste stream  are
summarized in Table V-158.
Since  none  of  the plants surveyed reported  discharging
extrusion neat oils, no samples were collected.
spent
Titanium Extrusion Spent EmuIs ions.  As discussed in Section III,
the extrusion process requires the use of a lubricant to  prevent
adhesion  of  the  metal to the die and  ingot  container  walls.
Water  use,  wastewater discharge,  and current recycle practices
corresponding to this waste stream are summarized in Table V--159.

No samples of extrusion spent emulsions were collected during the
sampling program.   However, to estimate pollutant loads for this
stream,  the  Agency assumed that discharged  titanium  extrusion
emulsions   would  have  wastewater  characteristics  similar [ to
rolling spent emulsions in the nickel-cobalt subcategory.   These
two waste streams are generated from operations which use similar
process chemicals for similar purposes (lubrication).   The  only
difference  between  the  wastewater characteristics of  the  ,two
streams should be the metals present.   The mass loading (mg/kkg)
of  titanium  in  titanium extrusion spent  emulsions  should  be
similar  to  the mass loading of nickel in nickel  rolling  spent
emulsions, and vice versa.  However, the mass loading of chromium
should  be.insignificant because titanium is seldom alloyed  with
chromium.   The  other pollutants in each waste stream,  and  the
mass loading at which they are present, should be similar.

Titanium Extrusion Press Hydraulic Fluid Leakage.   As  discussed
InSection  III,  due to the large force applied by a  hydraulic
press,  some hydraulic fluid leakage is unavoidable.   Water use,
wastewater discharge, and current recycle practices corresponding
to this waste stream are summarized in Table V-160.

Table  V-161  summarizes the analytical data for  priority  metal
                               454

-------
pollutants   and   selected  conventional   and   noncoriventional
pollutants.   One  sample of extrusion press hydraulic fluid  was
collected  at  one plant.   No pollutants were  detected  in  the
sample above treatable concentrations.

Titanium Forging Spent Lubricants.   As discussed in Section III,
either a water or oil medium can be sprayed onto forging dies for
proper lubrication.  Water use, wastewater discharge, and current
recycle  practices corresponding to this waste stream are  summa-
rized in Table V-162.

Since  none of the plants, surveyed reported wastewater  discharge
values for forging spent lubricants, no samples were collected.

Titanium Forging Contact Cooling Water.   As discussed in Section
III,  forging dies may require cooling to maintain the proper die
temperature between forgings.   Water use,  wastewater discharge,
and  current recycle practices corresponding to this waste stream
are summarized in Table V-163.

At  proposal,  the  Agency assumed that this  stream  would  have
wastewater  characteristics  similar to forging  contact  cooling
water in the 'nickel-cobalt subcategory.   These two waste streams
are  generated  by using water,  without additives,  to cool  hot
forgings  and  forging dies.   The only  difference  between  the
wastewater  characteristics  of  the two streams  should  be  the
metals  present.   The mass loading (mg/kkg) of titanium in tita-
nium  forging die contact cooling water should be similar to  the
mass  loading  of nickel in nickel forging  die  contact  cooling
water,  and  :vice versa.   However,  the mass loading of: chromium
should  be insignificant because titanium is seldom alloyed  with
chromium.   The  other pollutants in each waste stream,  and  the
mass loading at which they are present, should be similar.  After
proposal, these assumptions were confirmed by plant self-sampling
data.

Titanium Forging Equipment Cleaning Wastewater.   Forging  equip-
ment  may be periodically cleaned in order to prevent the  exces-
sive  build-up of oil and grease oh the forging die.   Water use,
wastewater discharge, and current recycle practices corresponding
to this waste stream are summarized in Table V-164.

To estimate pollutant loads for this stream,  the Agency  assumed
that this stream would have wastewater characteristics similar to
forging  contact cooling water in the nickel-cobalt  subcategory.
These assumptions were confirmed by plant self-sampling data.

Titanium Forging Press Hydraulic Fluid Leakage.   As discussed in
Section III, due to the large force applied by a hydraulic press,
some hydraulic fluid leakage is unavoidable.   Water use,  waste-
water  discharge,  and current recycle practices corresponding to
this waste stream are summarized in Table V-165.

One 'sample of forging press hydraulic fluid leakage was collected
at  one  plant.   An  elevated concentration of  oil  and  grease


                         =      455

-------
 (370,000 mg/1) was detected in this sample.

Titanium Tube Reducing Spent Lubricants.  As discussed in Section
III,  tube reducing, much like rolling, may require a lubricating
compound in order to prevent excessive wear of the tube  reducing
rolls,  and  to  maintain  a suitable and uniform  tube  reducing
temperature.    Water  use,  wastewater  discharge,  and  current
recycle  practices corresponding to this waste stream are  summa-
rized in Table V-166.

Table  V-167  summarizes the analytical data for  priority  metal
pollutants   and   selected  conventional   and   nonconventional
pollutants.   Three  samples  of  tube  reducing  lubricant  were
sampled at three plants.

Titanium Heat Treatment Contact Cooling Water.    As discussed  in
Section  III,  heat treatment is used by plants in the nonferrous
metals forming category to give the metal the desired  mechanical
properties.  After heat treatment, the metals must be cooled at a
controlled  rate.   Contact  cooling water may be used  for  this
purpose.   Water use,  wastewater discharge,  and current recycle
practices  corresponding  to this waste stream are summarized  in
Table V-168.

Table  V-169  summarizes the analytical data for  priority  metal
pollutants   and   selected  conventional   and   nonconventional
pollutants.  Five samples of heat treatment contact cooling water
were sampled at five plants.   Elevated concentrations of  copper
(11.0  mg/1),  zinc (6.7 mg/1),  aluminum (24.0 mg/1),  iron (440
mg/1),  titanium  (2.0 mg/1) and TSS (390 mg/1) were detected  in
these samples.

Titanium Surface Treatment Spent Baths.   As discussed in Section
III,  a  number of chemical treatments may be applied  after  the
forming  of titanium products.    The surface treatment baths must
be periodically discharged after their properties are  exhausted.
Water  use,  wastewater discharge,  and current recycle practices
corresponding to this waste stream are summarized in Table V-170.

Table V-171 summarizes the analytical sampling  data for  priority
and selected conventional and nonconventional pollutants. •  Three
samples  of  surface  treatment spent baths were  collected  from
three  streams  at  two  plants.    Elevated  concentrations   of
chromium,  titanium (60.,300 mg/1),  lead (214 mg/1), nickel, zinc
(166 mg/1), and TSS (3,360 mg/1) were detected  in .the samples.


Titanium  Surface Treatment Rinse.   As discussed in Section III,
rinsing  'follows  the surface treatment process  to  prevent  the
solution  from  affecting  the  surface of the  metal  beyond  the
desired  amount.   Water use,  wastewater discharge,  and current
recycle  practices corresponding to this waste  stream are  summa-
rized in Table V-172.

Table V-173 summarizes the analytical sampling  data for  priority
                               456

-------
and  selected conventional and nonconventional pollutants.   Nine
samples of surface treatment rinsewater were collected from  four
streams at two plants.  Elevated concentrations of chromium, lead
(5.9 mg/1),  nickel,  titanium (186 mg/1), and TSS (66 mg/1) were
detected in the samples.

Titanium Alkaline Cleaning Spent Baths.   As discussed in Section
III,  alkalinfe  cleaning  is commonly used to clean formed  metal
parts.   Products can be cleaned with an alkaline solution either
by  immersion ,or spray.   Water.use,  wastewater  discharge,  and
current recycle practices corresponding to this waste stream  are
summarized in Table V-174.

Table  V-175  summarizes the analytical data for  priority  metal
pollutants   and   selected  conventional   and   nonconventional
pollutants.    Five  samples  of  alkaline  cleaning  baths  were
collected at four plants.  Elevated concentrations of copper (6.3
mg/1),  iron (5.4 mg/1), titanium (6.5 mg/1), oil and grease (930
mg/1) and TSS (400 mg/1) were detected in these samples.

Titanium  Alkaline Cleaning Rinse.   As discussed in Section III,
rinsing1  follows  the alkaline cleaning process  to  prevent  the
solution  from  drying on the  product.   Water  use,  wastewater
discharge,  and  current recycle practices corresponding to  this
waste stream are summarized in Table V-176.

Table  V-177  summarizes the analytical data for  priority  metal
pollutants   and   selected  conventional   and   nonconventional
pollutants.   Four  samples of alkaline cleaning rinsewater  were
collected at four plants.  Elevated concentrations of copper (6.3
mg/1), and iron (1.9 mg/1) were detected in these samples.

Titanium  Molten Salt Rinse.   As discussed in Section III,  when
molten salt baths are used to descale titanium alloys,  they  are
generally followed by a waiter quench and rinse step.    Water use,
wastewater discharge, and current recycle practices corresponding
to this waste stream are summarized in Table V-178.

Titanium  Tumbling  Wastewater.   As  described in  Section  III,
tumbling  is ;an  operation in which forgings are  rotated  in  a
barrel with ceramic or metal slugs or abrasives to remove  scale,
fins,  oxides,   or burrs.   It may be done dry, with water, or an
aqueous solution containing cleaning compounds,  rust inhibitors,
or other additives.  Water use, wastewater discharge, and current
recycle  practices corresponding to this waste stream are  summa-
rized in Table V-179.

Table  V-180 summarizes the analytical sampling data for priority
and  selected conventional and nonconventional  pollutants.   One
sample of tumbling wastewater was collected.  Elevated concentra-
tions  of titanium (156 mg/1),  iron (111  mg/1),  aluminum  (182
mg/1),  boron (116 mg/1), fluoride (110 mg/1), ammonia (34 mg/1),
cyanide  (4.1  mg/1),  oil and grease (17 mg/1),  and TSS  (6,800
mg/1) were detected in the sample.
                               457

-------
Titanium  Sawing or Grinding Spent Neat Oils.   As  discussed  in
Section III,  sawing or grinding operations may use mineral-based
oils  or  heavy  grease  as the lubricant  required  to  minimize
friction and act as a coolant.   Normally,  cutting oils are  not
discharged  as a wastewater stream.   Water use,  wastewater dis-
charge, and current recycle practices corresponding to this waste
stream are summarized in Table v-181.

Since none of the plants surveyed reported discharging the sawing
or grinding spent neat oils, no samples were collected.        ;

Titanium  Sawing or Grinding Spent Emulsions.   As  discussed  in
Section  III,  sawing or grinding operations generally require  a
lubricant  in  order to minimize friction and act as  a  coolant.
Water  use,  wastewater discharge,  and current recycle practices
corresponding to this waste stream are summarized in Table V-182.

Table V-183 summarizes the analytical sampling data for  priority
and selected conventional and nonconventional pollutants.   Three
samples  of  sawing or grinding emulsions and synthetic  coolants
were collected from three streams at two plants.

Titanium Sawing or Grinding Contact Cooling Water.   As discussed
TnSection III,  a substance which functions as a lubricant  and
coolant is frequently needed during sawing or grinding.  Water is
one  substance which may be used.   Water  use,  wastewater  dis-
charge, and current recycle practices corresponding to this waste
stream are summarized in Table V-184.

Table  V-185  summarizes the analytical data for  priority  metal
pollutants   and   selected  conventional   and   nonconventional
pollutants.   One  sample  of sawing or grinding contact  cooling
water  was collected at one plant.   Elevated  concentrations  of
magnesium  (13.5 mg/1) and titanium (7.06 mg/1) were detected  in
this sample.

Titanium  Dye  Penetrant  Testing Wastewater.   As  discussed  in
Section  III,  testing  operations are used to  check  nonferrous
metals parts for discontinuities that are open to the surface  in
the  part  being tested.   Dye penetrant testing  operations  are
sources  of wastewater because the parts must be rinsed following
penetration of the dye so that,  upon inspection,  dye will  only
remain in the discontinuities.   Water use, wastewater discharge,
and  current recycle practices corresponding to this waste stream
are summarized in Table V-186.


Titanium Hydrotesting Wastewater.   As discussed in Section  III,
titanium  tubes  can be filled with pressurized water  for  leak-
testing.   Water use,  wastewater discharge,  and current recycle
practices  corresponding  to this waste stream are summarized  in
Table V-187.

No samples of hydrotesting wastewater were taken,  but the Agency
does not believe that using water,  without additives, in contact
                               458

-------
•with  clean  ,metal  will contaminate  the  water  with  treatable
concentrations of pollutants.

Titanium  Miscellaneous  Wastewater  Streams.   As  discussed  in
Section  III,  low volume sources of wastewater were reported  on
the  dcps.   These  sources  are saw spillage and  tool  cleaning
wastewater.  Because they generally represent low volume periodic
discharges applicable to most plants,  the Agency is including an
allowance  for  all  of these  streams  under  the  miscellaneous
wastewater sources waste stream.

No  samples  of miscellaneous wastewater sources  were  collected
during the sampling program.   However,  the Agency believes that
this  stream  will  have wastewater  characteristics  similar  to
.forging  contact cooling water in the nickel-cobalt  subcategory.
The only difference between the wastewater characteristics of the
two  streams  should  be the metals present.   The  mass  loading
(mg/kkg) of titanium in titanium miscellaneous wastewater sources
should be similar to the mass loading of nickel in nickel forging
contact cooling water,  and vice versa.   The other pollutants in
each waste stream,.  and the mass loading at which they are  pres-
ent, should be similar.

Titanium Degreasing Spent Solvents.  As described in Section III,
solvent cleaners are used to remove lubricants (oils and greases)
applied  to  the surface of nonferrous metals  during  mechanical
forming  operations.   Basic  solvent  cleaning  methods  include
straight  vapor degreasing,  immersion-vapor  degreasing,  spray-
vapor degreasing, ultrasonic vapor degreasing, emulsified solvent
degreasing, and cold cleaning.

Solvents most commonly used for all types of vapor degreasing are
trichloroethylene,   1,1,1-trichloroethane,  methylene  chloride,
perchloroethylene,   and  various  chlorofluorocarbons.   Solvent
selection  depends  on the required process temperature  (solvent
boiling  point),  product dimension,  and metal  characteristics.
Contaminated  vapor degreasing solvents are frequently  recovered
by distillation.

Since  none  ,of the plants surveyed  reported  discharging  spent
degreasing solvents, no samples were collected.

Titanium  Wet  Air Pollution Control Slowdown.   As discussed  in
Section  III,  wet  air pollution control devices are  needed  to
accompany some operations in order to meet air quality standards.
Water use,  wastewater discharge,  and current recycle  practices
corresponding to this waste stream are summarized in Table V-188.

Table  V-189 summarizes the analytical sampling data for priority
and  selected conventiona.1 and nonconventional  pollutants.   Two
samples  of surface treatment wet air pollution control  blowdown
were collected from two streams at two plants.   Elevated concen-
trations  of chromium,  nickel,  titanium and TSS (40 mg/1)  were
detected in the samples. |
                               459

-------
Titanium Operations Which Do Not Use Process Water.   The  Agency
has not established a discharge allowance for operations which do
not  generate  process  wastewater.    The  following  operations
generate no process wastewater,  because they use only noncontact
cooling water or because they use no water at all:

     Casting
     Shot Blasting
     Grit Blasting
     Machining
     Torching
     Deoxidizing
     Straightening
     Trimming
     Piercing
     Shearing.

Uranium Forming Subcategory

Uranium Extrusion Spent Lubricants.  As discussed in Section III,
the  extrusion process requires the use of a lubricant to prevent
adhesion of the metal to the die and ingot container walls. Water
use,   wastewater  discharge,   and  current  recycle   practices
corresponding to this waste stream are summarized in Table V-190.

Since  none of the plants surveyed reported wastewater  dischcirge
values for extrusion spent lubricants, no samples were collected.

Uranium  Extrusion Tool Contact Cooling Water.   As discussed  in
Section III,  following an extrusion,  the dummy block drops from
the  press  and  is cooled before being  used  again.   Water  is
sometimes used to quench the extrusion tools.   Water use, waste-
water  discharge,  and current recycle practices corresponding to
this waste stream are summarized in Table V-191.

At  proposal,  the  Agency assumed that this  stream  would  have
wastewater  characteristics  similar to forging  contact  cooling
water in the nickel-cobalt subcategory.   These two waste streams
are generated by using water, without added process chemicals, to
cool  metal forming equipment.   The only difference between  the
wastewater  characteristics  of  the two streams  should  be  the
metals present.   The mass loading (mg/kkg) of uranium in uranium
extrusion  tool  contact cooling water should be similar  to  the
mass  loading of nickel in nickel forging contact cooling  water,
and  vice versa.   However,  there should be no significant  mass
loading  of  chromium in uranium extrusion tool  contact  cooling
water because uranium is not commonly alloyed with chromium.  The
other  riollutants in each waste stream,  and the mass loading  at
which th'ey are present, should be similar.   After proposal, these
assumptions were confirmed by plant self-sampling data.

Uranium  Forging Spent Lubricants.    As discussed in Section III,
proper lubrication of the dies is essential in forging nonferrous
metals.   A colloidal graphite lubricant is commonly sprayed onto
the dies for this purpose.    Water  use, wastewater discharge, and
                               460

-------
current recycle practices corresponding to this waste stream  are
summarized in Table V-192.

Since  none of the plants surveyed reported wastewater  discharge
values for forging spent lubricants, no samples were collected.

Uranium  Heat:Treatment Contact Cooling Water.   As discussed  in
Section  III,  heat treatment is used by plants in the ;nonferrous
metals forming category to give the metal the desired  mechanical
properties.  After heat treatment, the metals must be cooled at a
controlled  rate.   Contact  cooling water may be used  for  this
purpose.   Water use,  wasitewater discharge,  and current recycle
practices  corresponding  to this waste stream are summarized  in
Table V-193.

Table V-194 summarizes the analytical sampling data for  priority
and selected conventional and nonconventional pollutants,   Three
samples  of  heat treatment contact cooling water were  collected
from three streams at one plant.  Elevated concentrations of lead
(14.0  mg/1),  nickel (2.3 mg/1),  uranium (51.5 mg/1),  oil  and
grease  (84 mg/1),  and TSS (100 mg/1) were detected in the  sam-
ples.

Uranium Surface Treatment Spent Baths.   As discussed in  Section
III, a number of chemical treatments may be applied after forming
uranium  products.   The surface treatment baths must be periodi-
cally  discharged after their properties  are  exhausted.   Water
use,  wastewater discharge,  and current recycle practice's corre-
sponding to this waste stream are summarized in Table V-195.

Table  V-196 summarizes the analytical sampling data for priority
and  selected conventional and nonconventional  pollutants.   One
sample  of  surface  treatment spent bath was  collected  at  one
plant.   Elevated  concentrations  of copper  (16.0  mg/1),  lead
(860.0  mg/1),  and  aluminum (430.0 mg/1) were .detected  in  the
sample.   This  sample  was not analyzed for  uranium  but  plant
personnel reported that its concentration was about 280 g/1.

Uranium  Surface Treatment Rinse.   As discussed in Section  III,
rinsing  generally  follows  the  surface  treatment  process  to
prevent  the  solution  from affecting the surface of  the  metal
beyond the desired amount.   Water use, wastewater discharge, and
current recycle practices corresponding to this waste stream  are
summarized in Table V-197.

Table  V-198 summarizes the analytical sampling data for priority
and selected conventional and nonconventional pollutants.   Three
samples  of  surface  treatment rinse  were  collected  from  two
streams  at one plant.   Elevated concentrations of copper  (12.0
mg/1),  lead  (110.0  mg/1),  nickel (3.4 mg/1),  uranium  (2,700
mg/1), and TSS (430 mg/1) were detected in the samples.

Uranium  Sawing  or Grinding Spent Emulsions.   As  discussed  in
Section  III,  sawing or grinding operations generally require  a
lubricant  in  order to minimize friction and act as  a  coolant.


                               461

-------
The emulsions are typically recirculated, with in-line filtration
to remove swarf,  and periodically batch discharged as the lubri-
cating  properties are exhausted.   Water  use,  wastewater  dis-
charge, and current recycle practices corresponding to this waste
stream are summarized in Table V-199.

Table  V-200 summarizes the analytical sampling data for priority
and  selected conventional and nonconventional  pollutants.   One
sample of sawing or grinding spent emulsions was collected at one
plant.   Elevated  concentrations of phenanthrene (32.607  mg/1),
lead (7.3 mg/1),  zinc (7.5 mg/1),  uranium (37.5 mg/1),  oil and
grease  (7,500  mg/1),  and TSS (510 mg/1) were detected  in  the
sample.

Uranium Sawing or Grinding Contact Cooling Water.   As  discussed
in  Section III,  a substance which functions as a lubricant  and
coolant  is frequently needed during sawing and grinding.   Water
is one type of substance which may be used.   Water  use,  waste-
water  discharge,  and current recycle practices corresponding to
this waste stream are summarized in Table V-201.

No samples of sawing or grinding contact cooling water were  col-
lected during the sampling program.   However, to estimate pollu-
tant  loads for this stream,  the Agency assumed that this stream
would  have  wastewater  characteristics  similar  to  sawing  or
grinding   contact  cooling  water  in  the   refractory   metals
subcategory.   The only difference between the wastewater charac-
teristics  of the two streams should be the metals present.   The
mass  loading (mg/kkg) of uranium in uranium sawing  or  grinding
contact  cooling  water should be similar to the mass loading  of
refractory metals in refractory metals sawing or grinding contact
cooling  water,  and vice versa.   The other pollutants  in  each
waste  stream,  and  the mass loading at which they are  present,
should be similar.

Uranium Sawing or Grinding Rinse.   As discussed in Section  III,
following  the sawing or grinding operations,  the lubricant  and
sawing  and grinding fines occasionally need to be rinsed off the
formed  metal.   Water use,  wastewater  discharge,  and  current
recycle  practices corresponding to this waste stream are  summa-
rized in Table V-202.

No  samples of sawing or grinding rinse were collected during the
sampling program.   However, to estimate pollutant loads for this
stream, the Agency assumed that this stream would have wastewater
characteristics  similar  to sawing or grinding  contact  cooling
water in the refractory metals subcategory.   These waste streams
are both derived from sawing or grinding operations,  so the only
difference  between  the wastewater characteristics  of  the  two
streams should be the metals present.   The mass loading (mg/kkg)
of  uranium in uranium sawing or grinding rinse should be similar
to  the  mass loading of refractory metals in  refractory  metals
sawing or grinding contact cooling water,  and vice  versa.   The
other  pollutants in each waste stream,  and the mass loading  at
which they are present, should be similar.
                               462

-------
Uranium  Area Cleaning Washwater.    As discussed in Section  III,
OSHA  requirements  dictate  area cleaning or  floor  washing  at
uranium  forming  facilities.   Area cleaning helps  to  minimize
airborne  uranium  particles  and hence helps  control  radiation
exposure.   Water use,  wastewater discharge, and current recycle
practices  corresponding to this waste stream are  summarized  in
Table V-203.

Table  V-204 summarizes the analytical sampling data for priority
and selected .conventional and nonconventional pollutants.   Three
samples  of  area cleaning wastewater were collected  from  three
streams  at one plant.   Elevated concentrations  of  p-chloro-m-
cresol  (15.031 mg/1), .bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (4.879 mg/1),
lead (4.1 mg/1),  copper (2.3 mg/1),  zinc (11.0  mg/1),  uranium
(130  mg/1),  oil and grease (6,000 mg/1),  and TSS (1,600  mg/1)
were detected in the samples.

Uranium Degreasing Spent Solvents.   As described in Section III,
solvent'cleaners are used to remove lubricants (oils and greases)
applied  to  the surface of nonferrous metals  during  mechanical
forming  operations.   Basic  solvent  cleaning  methods  include
straight  vapor degreasing,  immersion-vapor  degreasing,  spray-
vapor degreasing, ultrasonic vapor degreasing, emulsified solvent
degreasing, and cold cleaning.

Solvents most commonly used for all types of vapor degreasing are
trichloroethylene,   1,1,1-trichloroethane,  methylene  chloride^
perchloroethylene,   and  various  chlorofluorocarbons.   Solvent
selection  depends  on the required process temperature  (solvent
boiling  point.),  product dimension,  and metal  characteristics.
Contaminated  vapor degreasing solvents are frequently  recovered
by distillation.

Since  none  of the plants surveyed  reported  discharging  spent
degreasing solvents, no samples were collected.

Uranium  Wet  Air Pollution Control Slowdown.   As  discussed  in
Section  III,  wet  air pollution control devices are  needed  to
control  air emissions from some operations in order to meet  air
quality  standards.   Scrubbers are frequently needed to  control
acid fumes from surface treatment operations.   Water use, waste-
water  discharge,  and current recycle practices corresponding to
this waste stream are summarized in Table V-205.

Table V-206 summarizes the analytical sampling data for  priority
and  selected conventional and nonconventional  pollutants.   One
sample  of  surface treatment wet air pollution control  blowdown
was collected at one plant.  Elevated concentrations of zinc (1.1
mg/1),  uranium (1,000 mg/1), and TSS (650 mg/1) were detected in
the sample.

Uranium Drum Washwater.  As discussed in Section III, solid waste
from uranium forming operations is stored in drums and shipped to
a low-level radioactive waste landfill.   The drums are  required


                               463

-------
to  be  free  from external radioactive  contamination  prior  to
shipment.   Drums  are washed with soapy water which may be recy-
cled  using in-line filtration prior to  discharge.   Water  use,
wastewater discharge, and current recycle practices corresponding
to this waste stream are summarized in Table V-207.

Table  V-208 summarizes the analytical sampling data for priority
and  selected conventional and nonconventional  pollutants.   One
sample of drum wash water was collected at one  plant.   Elevated
concentrations of uranium (5.7 mg/1),  magnesium (28.6 mg/1), and
TSS (23 mg/1) were detected in the sample.

Uranium  Laundry Washwater.   As discussed in Section  III,  OSHA
requirements  dictate  employees' clothing must  remain  on-site.
Therefore,  laundry service is provided by the plant.  Water use,
wastewater discharge, and current recycle practices corresponding
to this waste stream are summarized in Table V-209.

Table  V-210 summarizes the analytical sampling data for priority
and  selected conventional and nonconventional  pollutants.   One
sample  of laundry wash water was collected at one  plant.   Ele-
vated  concentrations  of oil and grease (42 mg/1)  and  TSS  (11
mg/1) were detected in the sample.

Uranium  Operations Which Do Not Use Process Water.,  The  Agency
has not established a discharge allowance for operations which do
not  generate  process  wastewater.    The  following  operations
generate no process wastewater,  because they use only noncontact
cooling water or because they use no water at all:

     Stationary Casting
     Direct Chill Casting
     Salt Solution Heat Treatment.
Zinc Forming Subcategory

Zinc  Rolling  Spent  Neat Oils.   As described in
mineral  oil  or  kerosene-based lubricants can be
Section
used
                                                          in
III,
 the
rolling of zinc products.  The oils are usually recycled with in-
line  filtration and periodically disposed of by sale to  an  oil
reclaimer or by incineration.   Water use,  wastewater discharge,
and  current recycle practices corresponding to this waste stream
are summarized in Table V-211.

Since  none  of  the plants  surveyed  reported  discharging  the
rolling spent neat oils, no samples were collected.

Zinc Rolling Spent Emulsions.   As discussed in Section III, oil-
water  emulsions  are used in rolling operations as coolants  and
lubricants.   Rolling emulsions are typically recycled using  in-
line  filtration treatment,  with periodic batch discharge of the
recycled emulsion.   Water use, wastewater discharge, and current
recycle   practices  corresponding  to  this  waste  stream   are
summarized in Table V-212.
                               464

-------
No  samples of rolling spent emulsions were collected during  the
sampling program.   However, to estimate pollutant loads for this
stream, the Agency assumed that this stream would have wastewater
characteristics  similar to rolling spent emulsions in the  lead-
tin-bismuth subcategory.   These two waste streams are  generated
by   identical  physical  processes  which  use  similar  process
chemicals.   The only difference should be the identity of metals
present.  The;mass loading (mg/kkg) of zinc in zinc rolling spent
emulsions  should be similar to the mass loading of lead in  lead
rolling spent emulsions,  and vice versa.   The other  pollutants
present in each waste stream,  and the mass loading at which they
are present, should be similar.

Zinc Rolling Contact Cooling Water.  As discussed in Section III,
it  is  necessary  to use a lubricant-coolant during  rolling  to
prevent excessive wear on the rolls, to prevent adhesion of metal
to  the  rolls,  and to mctintain a suitable and  uniform  rolling
temperature.  Water is one type of lubricant-coolant which may be
used.   Water  use,  wastewater discharge,  and  current  recycle
practices  corresponding  to this waste stream are summarized  in
Table V-213.

At  proposal,  the  Agency assumed that this  stream  would  have
wastewater   characteristics  similar  to  shot  casting  contact
cooling  water'in the lead-tin-bismuth  subcategory.   These  two
waste streams.are generated by using water, without additives, to
cool  hot  metal.   The  only difference between  the  wastewater
characteristics of the two streams should be the metals  present.
The mass loading (mg/kkg) of zinc in zinc rolling contact cooling
water  should be similar to the mass loading of lead in lead shot
casting contact cooling water,  and vice versa.  The other pollu-
tants present in each waste stream, and the mass loading at which
they  are present,  should be  similar.   After  proposal,  these
assumptions were confirmed by plant self-sampling data.

Zinc Drawing Spent Emulsions.   As discussed in Section III, oil-
water  emulsions are used for many drawing applications in  order
to  ensure uniform drawing temperatures and avoid excessive . wear
on  the  dies  and  mandrels used.   The  drawing  emulsions  are
frequently recycled and batch discharged periodically after their
lubricating  properties are  exhausted.   Water  use,  wastewater
discharge,  and  current recycle practices corresponding to  this
waste stream are summarized in Table V-214.

No  samples of drawing spent emulsions were collected during  the
sampling program.   However, to estimate pollutant loads for this
stream, the Agency assumed that this stream would have wastewater
characteristics  similar to rolling spent emulsions in the  lead-
tin-bismuth subcategory.   These waste streams are genereited from
operations   using   similar  process   chemicals   (oil-in-water
emulsions)   for  similar  purposes  (lubrication).    The   only
difference  should  be  the metals  present.   The  mass  loading
(mg/kkg)  of  '.zinc  in  zinc drawing spent  emulsions  should  be
similar  to  the  mass  loading of lead  in  lead  rolling  spent
emulsions,  and vice versa.  The other pollutants present in each


                               465

-------
waste  stream,  and the mass loading 'at which they  are  present,
should be similar.

Zinc Direct Chill Casting Contact Cooling Water.  As discussed in
Section III,  contact cooling water is a necessary part of direct
chill  casting.   The cooling water may be contaminated by lubri-
cants applied to the mold before and during the casting  process.
The  cooling water may be recycled.   Water use,  wastewater dis-
charge, and current recycle practices corresponding to this waste
stream are summarized in Table V-215.

At  proposal,  the  Agency assumed that this  stream  would  have
wastewater   characteristics  similar  to  semi-continuous  ingot
casting   contact   cooling   water   in   the   lead-tin-bismuth
subcategory.  After proposal, these assumptions were confirmed by
plant self-sampling data.   These two waste streams are generated
by using water,  without additives,  to cool cast  metal.   Since
lubricants may be applied to the casting molds in both processes,
both  streams may be contaminated by these lubricants.   The only
difference  between the waste streams should be the  metals  pre-
sent.   The  mass  loading (mg/kkg) of zinc in zinc direct  chill
casting  contact  cooling  water should be similar  to  the  mass
loading  of  lead in lead semi-continuous ingot  casting  contact
cooling water,  and vice versa.   The other pollutants present in
each waste stream,  and the mass loading at which they are  pres-
ent, should be similar.

Zinc  Stationary Casting Contact Cooling Water.   As discussed in
Section  III,  lubricants  and  cooling  water  are  usually  not
required  in stationary casting.   Since molten metal  is  poured
into  the  molds,  if contact cooling water is used,  it is  fre-
quently  lost due to evaporation.   Water  use,  wastewater  dis-
charge, and current recycle practices corresponding to this waste
stream are summarized in Table V-216.

Since  none  of  the  plants surveyed  reported  discharging  the
stationary  casting contact cooling water,  no samples were  col-
lected.

Zinc  Heat  Treatment Contact Cooling  Water.   As  discussed  in
Section  III,  contact cooling water may be used for  controlled-
rate  cooling  of heat-treated  metals.   Water  use,  wastewater
discharge,  and  current recycle practices corresponding to  this
waste stream are summarized in Table V-217.

At  proposal,  the  Agency  assumed that this stream  would  have
wastewater  characteristics similar to continuous  strip  casting
contact cooling water in the lead-tin-bismuth subcategory.  After
proposal,  this  assumption was confirmed by plant  self-sampling
data.

Zinc Surface Treatment Spent Baths.  As discussed in Section III,
a  number of chemical treatments may be applied after the forming
of zinc products.   The surface treatment baths must be  periodi-
cally  discharged  after their properties are  exhausted.   Water
                               466

-------
use,  wastewater discharge,  and current recycle practices corre-
sponding -to this waste stream are summarized in Table V-218.

At  proposal,  the  Agency assumed that this  stream  would  have
wastewater  characteristics  similar to surface  treatment  spent
baths in the magnesium subcategory.;  After proposal, this assump-
tion was confirmed by plant self-sampling data.

Zinc  Surface  Treatment  Rinse.   As discussed in  Section  III,
rinsing  follows  the surface treatment process  to  prevent  the
solution  from  affecting  the surface of the  metal  beyond  the
desired  amount.   Water use,  wastewater discharge,  and current
recycle  practices corresponding to this waste stream are  summa-
rized in Table V-219.

Table V-220 summarizes the analytical sampling data for  priority
and  selected conventional and nonconventional  pollutants.   One
sample  of  surface treatment rinse was collected at  one  plant.
Elevated  concentrations  of zinc (42.3  mg/1),  chromium  (0.160
mg/1), nickel (8.10 mg/1), and TSS (20 mg/1) were detected in the
sample.

Zinc Alkaline Cleaning Spent Baths.  As discussed in Section III,
alkaline cleaners are formulations of alkaline salts,  water, and
surfactants.    Spent  solutions  are  discharged  from  alkaline
cleaning  processes after their properties are exhausted.   Water
use,  wastewater discharge,  and current recycle practices corre-
sponding to this waste stream are summarized in Table V-221.

At  proposal,  the  Agency assumed that this  stream  would  have
wastewater  characteristics  similar to alkaline cleaning  rinse-
water in this subcategory.   After proposal,  this assumption was
confirmed by plant self-sampling data.

Zinc  Alkaline  Cleaning Rinse.   As discussed  in  Section"  III,
following alkaline treating,  metal parts are rinsed.  Rinses are
discharged from alkaline cleaning processes.   Water use,  waste-
water  discharge,  and current recycle practices corresponding to
this waste stream are summarized in,Table V-222.

Table V-223 summarizes the analytical sampling data for  priority
and  selected conventional and nonconventional  pollutants.   One
sample  of  alkaline cleaning rinse was collected at  one  plant.
Elevated concentrations of zinc (1.12 mg/1),  cyanide (1.3 mg/1),
oil and grease (23 mg/1),  and TSS (90 mg/1) were detected in the
sample.

Zinc Sawing or Grinding Spent Emulsions.  As discussed in Section
III,  sawing or grinding operations generally require a lubricant
in  order to minimize friction and act as a  coolant.   Oil-water
emulsions are frequently used as lubricants.   Water use,  waste-
water  discharge,  and current recycle practices corresponding to
this waste stream are summarized in Table V-224.

At  proposal,  the  Agency assumed that this  stream  would  have


                               467

-------
wastewafcer  characteristics  similar to sawing or grinding  spent
emulsions  in  the nickel-cobalt subcategory.   These  two  waste
streams  are generated by identical physical processes which  use
similar  process chemicals.   The only difference should  be  the
metals present.  The mass loading (mg/kkg) of zinc in zinc sawing
or grinding spent emulsions should be similar to the mass loading
of nickel in nickel sawing or grinding spent emulsions,  and vice
versa.   The  mass loading of chromium in zinc sawing or grinding
spent emulsions should be insignificant,  since chromium is often
alloyed  with  nickel but not with zinc.   The  other  pollutants
present in each waste stream,  and the mass loading at which they
are present,  should be similar.   After proposal,  these assump-
tions were confirmed by plant self-sampling data.

Zinc  Degreasing Spent Solvents.   As described in  Section  III,
solvent cleaners are used to remove lubricants (oils and greases)
applied  to  the surface of nonferrous metals  during  mechanical
forming  operations.   Basic  solvent  cleaning  methods  include
straight  vapor degreasing,  immersion-vapor  degreasing,  spray-
vapor degreasing, ultrasonic vapor degreasing, emulsified solvent
degreasing, and cold cleaning.

Solvents most commonly used for all types of vapor degreasing are
trichloroethylene,   1,1,1-trichloroethane,  methylene  'chloride,
perchloroethylene,   and  various  chlorofluorocarbons.   Solvent
selection  depends  on the required process temperature  (solvent
boiling  point),  product dimension,  and metal  characteristics.
Contaminated  vapor degreasing solvents are frequently  recovered
by distillation.

Since  none  of the plants surveyed  reported  discharging  spent
degreasing solvents., no samples were collected.

Zinc Electrocoating Rinse.  As discussed in Section III, products
are  usually  rinsed  following electrocoating  before  they  are
subsequently  formed.     Water  use,  wastewater  discharge,  and
current  recycle practices corresponding to this waste stream are
summarized in Table V-225.

No  samples  of electrocoating rinse were  collected  during  the
sampling program.   However, the characteristics of the rinse are
expected  to include the pollutants present in the electrocoating
bath  solution.   Electrocoating  of copper onto  zinc  generates
wastewater with significant concentrations of copper and cyanide.


Zinc Operations Which Do Not Use Process Water.   The Agency  has
not established a discharge allowance for operations which do not
generate, process wastewater.   The following operations generate
no process wastewater,  either because they are dry operations or
because they use only noncontact cooling water:

     Continuous Casting
     Melting
     Slitting
                               468

-------
    ' Stamping
     Sawing
     Homogenizing
     Printing
     Coating
     Drying
     Metal Powder Production.

Zirconium-Hafnium Forming Subcategory

Zirconium-Hafnium  Rolling  Spent Neat  Oils.   As  discussed  in
Section III, mineral oil or kerosene-based lubricants can be used
in  the  rolling  of zirconium-hafnium products.   The  oils  are
usually  recycled with' in-line filtration and  periodically  dis-
posed  of by sale to an oil reclaimer or by incineration.   Water
use,  wastewater discharge,  and current recycle practices corre-
sponding to 'this waste stream are summarized in Table V-226.
Since ;none ; of  the plants  surveyed  reported  discharging
rolling spent neat oils, no samples were collected.
the
Zirconium-Hafnium  Drawing  Spent Lubricants.   As  discussed  in
Section  III,  a suitable lubricant is required to ensure uniform
drawing  temperatures  and avoid excessive wear on the  dies  and
mandrels used.   A wide variety of lubricants can be used.  Water
use,  wastewater discharge,  and current recycle practices corre-
sponding to:this waste stream are summarized in Table V-227.

Since  none  of  the plants  surveyed  reported  discharging  the
drawing spent lubricants, no samples were collected.

Zirconium-Hafnium  Extrusion Spent Lubricants.   As discussed  in
Section  III,  the extrusion process requires the use of a lubri-
cant  to  prevent  adhesion of the metal to  the  die  and  ingot
container walls.   Water use,  wastewater discharge,  and current
recycle  practices corresponding to this waste stream are  summa-
rized in Table V-228.
Since  none  of  the  plants surveyed  reported  discharging
extrusion spent lubricants, no samples were collected.
the
Zirconium-Hafnium  Extrusion Press Hydraulic Fluid  Leakage.   As
discussed  in Section III,  due to the large force applied  by  a
hydraulic  press,  some  hydraulic fluid leakage is  unavoidable.
Water use, ; wastewater discharge,  and current recycle  practices
corresponding to this waste stream are summarized in Table V-229.

Table  V-230  summarizes the analytical data for  priority  metal
pollutants ,  and   selected  conventional   and   nonconventional
pollutants.   One  sample  of  extrusion  press  hydraulic  fluid
leakage was collected at one plant.   No pollutants were found in
this sample at treatable concentrations.

Zirconium-Hafnium  Swaging  Spent  Neat Oils.   As  discussed  in
Section III, mineral oil can be used in the swaging of zirconium-
                               469

-------
hafnium  products.   The oils are usually recycled  with  in-line
filtration  and  periodically  disposed  of by  sale  to  an  oil
reclaimer or by incineration.   Water use,  wastewater discharge,
and  current recycle practices corresponding to this waste stream
are summarized in Table V-231.

Since  none  of  the plants  surveyed  reported  discharging  the
swaging spent neat oils, no samples were collected.

Zirconium-Hafnium  Tube Reducing Spent Lubricants.   As discussed
in Section III,tube reducing,  much like rolling, may require a
lubricating  compound in order to prevent excessive wear  of  the
tube  reducing equipment,  prevent adhesion of metal to the  tube
reducing  equipment,  and  maintain a suitable and  uniform  tube
reducing  temperature.   Water  use,  wastewater  discharge,  and
current  recycle practices corresponding to this waste stream are
summarized in Table V-232.

Zirconium-Hafnium  Heat  Treatment  Contact  Cooling  Water.   As
discussed in Section III, heat treatment is used by plants in the
nonferrous metals forming category to give the metal the  desired
mechanical properties.   After heat treatment, the metals must be
cooled  at a controlled rate.   Contact cooling water may be used
for this purpose.   Water use,  wastewater discharge, and current
recycle  practices corresponding to this waste stream are  summa-
rized in Table V-233.

Table  V-234  summarizes the analytical data for  priority  metal
pollutants   and   selected  conventional   and   nonconventional
pollutants.  Five samples of heat treatment contact cooling water
were  collected from three plants.   Elevated  concentrations  of
aluminum  (3.0  mg/1),  iron (12 mg/1),  magnesium (30 mg/1)  and
molybdenum (370 mg/1) were detected in this sample.
Zirconium-Hafnium Surface Treatment Spent Baths.   As
Section III,a number of chemical treatments may be
the forming of zirconium-hafnium products including
coating.   The  surface  treatment  baths  must  be
discharged  after  their properties are  exhausted.
wastewater discharge, and current recycle practices
to this waste stream are summarized in Table V-235.
 discussed in
applied after
pickling  and
 periodically
  Water  use,
corresponding
Table  V-236 summarizes the analytical sampling data for priority
and selected conventional and nonconventional pollutants.   Three
samples  of  surface treatment spent baths  were  collected  from
three streams at two plants.  Elevated concentrations of antimony
(6 mg/1), zinc (7.5 mg/1), chromium (24 mg/1), nickel (3.6 mg/1)!,
zirconium  (3,100  mg/1),  and  oil and grease (83.9  mg/1)  were
detected in the samples.

Zirconium-Hafnium  Surface  Treatment  Rinse.   As  discussed  in
SectionIII,rTnsing follows the surface treatment  process  to
prevent  the  solution  from affecting the surface of  the  metal
beyond the desired amount.   Water use, wastewater discharge, and
current recycle practices corresponding to this waste stream  are
                               470

-------
summarized in Table V-237.
Zirconium-Hafnium Alkaline Cleaning Spent Baths.  As discussed in
Section  III,  alkaline  cleaners  are formulations  of  alkaline
salts,  water,  and surfactants.   Spent solutions are discharged
from  alkaline cleaning processes.   Water use,  wastewater  dis-
charge, and current recycle practices corresponding to this waste
stream are summarized in Table V-238.

Zirconium-Hafnium  Alkaline  Cleaning  Rinse.   As  discussed  in
Section III, following alkaline cleaning, metal parts are rinsed.
Rinses  are discharged from alkaline cleaning  processes.   Water
use,  wastewater discharge,  and current recycle practices corre-
sponding to this waste stream are summarized in Table V-239.

Zirconium-Hafnium  Molten Salt Rinse.   As discussed  in  Section
III, when molten salt baths are used to descale zirconium-hafnium
alloys,  they  are generally followed by a water quench and rinse
step.   Water  use,  wastewater discharge,  and  current  recycle
practices  corresponding  to this waste stream are summarized  in
Table V-240.             ;

No  samples  of  molten  salt rinse  were  collected  during  the
sampling program.   However, to estimate pollutant loads for this
stream, the Agency assumed that this stream would have wastewater
characteristics similar to molten salt rinse in the nickel-cobalt
subcategory.   These  two waste streams are generated from  using
water  to remove salt solutions from descaled  metal.   The  only
difference  between  the  wastewater characteristics of  the  two
streams should be the metals present.   The mass loading (mg/kkg)
of  .zirconium-hafnium  in  zirconium-hafnium  molten  salt  rinse
should be similar to the mass loading of nickel in nickel  molten
salt  rinse,  and  vice  versa.   However,  the mass  loading  of
chromium  should  be insignificant because  zirconium-hafnium  is
seldom alloyed with chromium.  The other pollutants in each waste
stream, and the mass loading at which they are present, should be
similar.

Zirconium-Hafnium
   	  Sawing or Grinding Spent Neat Oils.
   Section III,  sawing or grinding operations
	 	 	 	 	    As  dis-
cussed  in  Section III,   sawing or grinding operations  may  use
mineral-based  oils or heavy grease as the lubricant required  to
minimize friction and act as a coolant.    Normally,  cutting oils
are not discharged as a wastewater stream.  Water use, wastewater
discharge,  and  current recycle practices corresponding to  this
waste stream are summarized in Table V-241.

Since none of the plants surveyed reported discharging the sawing
spent neat oils, no samples were cpllected.

Zirconium-Hafnium
        	  Sawing or Grinding Spent Emulsions.
        in Section III,  sawing or grinding operations
                                                As  dis-
                                               generally
a lubricant in order to minimize friction and act  as  a
  Oil-water  emulsions  are  often used  as  lubricants.
   wastewater discharge,  and current recycle  practices
cussed
require
coolant.
Water use,
corresponding to this waste stream are summarized in Table V-242.
                               471

-------
Zirconium-Hafnium  Sawing or Grinding Contact Cooling Water.   As
discussed in Section III, a lubricant is frequently needed during
sawing or grinding.   Water,  without additives,  is one type  of
lubricant  which may be used.   Water use,  wastewater discharge,
and current recycle practices corresponding to this waste  stream
are summarized in Table V-243.

No  samples of sawing or grinding contact cooling water were col-
lected during the sampling program.   However, to estimate pollu-
tant loads for this stream,  the Agency assumed that this  stream
would  have  wastewater  characteristics  similar  to  sawing  or
grinding  spent emulsions in this subcategory.   These two  waste
streams  are  generated  from using a lubricant to saw  or  grind
zirconium-hafnium.   Therefore,  the  pollutants present and  the
mass  loadings of pollutants present in these two  waste  streams
are expected to be similar.

Zirconium-Hafnium  Sawing  or Grinding Rinse.   As
		discussed   in
following  the sawing and grinding operations,  the
 fines  from sawing and grinding may  need  to   be
                Water use,  wastewater  discharge,
Section  III,
lubricant  and
rinsed off the formed metal.
and  current recycle practices corresponding to this waste stream
are summarized in Table V-244.
Zirconium-Hafnium
                            Wastewater.
	  Inspection and Testing  	
Section  III,  testing operations are used
	  	    As  dis-
cussed  in  Section  III,  testing operations are used  to  check
zirconium-hafnium parts for surface defects or subsurface  imper-
fections  as  well  as overall  product  integrity.   Water  use,
wastewater discharge, and current recycle practices corresponding
to this waste stream.are summarized in Table V-245.

Table  V-246  summarizes the analytical data for  priority  metal
pollutants   and   selected  conventional   and   nonconventional
pollutants.   Four  samples of inspection and testing  wastewater
were collected at three plants.  No pollutants were found in this
sample at treatable concentrations.

Zirconium-Hafnium  Degreasing  Spent Solvents.   As discussed  in
SectionIII,Immersion-vapor degreasing is used to clean  metal
parts coated with large quantities of oil,  grease,  or  hard-to-
remove  soil.   Solvents  used may be the same as those  used  in
straight vapor degreasing.  Solutions of organic solvent in water
are also used for degreasing.   Water use,  wastewater discharge,
and  current recycle practices corresponding to this waste stream
are summarized in Table V-247.

Zirconium-Hafnium Degreasing Rinse.  As discussed in Section III,
it is sometimes necessary to rinse degreased parts with water  to
meet  certain  product  specifications.   Water  use,  wastewater
discharge,  and  current recycle practices corresponding to  this
waste stream are summarized in Table V-248.

Zirconium-Hafnium  Wet Air Pollution Control Slowdown.   As  dis-
cussedInSection III,  wet air pollution control  devices  are
                               472

-------
needed  to accompany some operations in order to meet air quality
standards.   Water use, wastewater discharge, and current recycle
practices  corresponding to this waste stream are  summarized  in
Table V-249.

No  samples of wet air pollution control blowdown were  collected
during  the  sampling program.   However,  to estimate  pollutant
loads for this stream,  the Agency assumed that this stream would
have  wastewater  characteristics similar to  wet  air  pollution
control  blowdown  in the titanium subcategory.   The  two  waste
streams derive from air pollution control devices used to collect
and  concentrate  airborne  particulates.   The  only  difference
between  the wastewater characteristics of the two streams should
be the metals present.   The mass loading (mg/kkg) of  zirconium-
hafnium  in zirconium-hafnium wet air pollution control  blowdown
should be similar to the mass loading of titanium in titanium wet
air  pollution  control  blowdown,  and vice  versa.   The  other
pollutants  in each waste stream,  and the mass loading at  which
they are present, should be similar.

Zirconium-Hafriium Operations Which Do Not Use Process Water.  The
Agency  has not established a discharge allowance for  operations
which do not generate process wastewater.   The following  opera-
tions  generate  no  process wastewater,  because they  use  only
noncontact cooling water or because they use no water at all:

     Rolling
     Casting
     Annealing
     Shot Blasting
     Grit Blasting
     Bead Blasting
     Polishing
     Straightening
     Cutting, Trimming
     Deburring, Sanding.

Metal Powders Subcategory

Metal Powder Production Atomization Wastewater.   As discussed in
Section  III,  wet  atomization is a method  of  producing  metal
powder  in  which a stream of water impinges upon a molten  metal
stream,  breaking  it  into  droplets which  solidify  as  powder
particles.   Water  atomization  is used to  produce  irregularly
shaped  particles required for powder metallurgy applications  in
which a powder is cold pressed into a compact.   Because  cooling
times  play an important role in determining particle  configura-
tion, the atomized metal droplets are sometimes rapidly cooled by
falling  into  a water bath.   Atomization and quench  water  are
separated from the metal powder by gravity settling or filtration
and  discharged.   Water use,  wastewater discharge,  and current
recycle  practices corresponding to this waste stream are  summa-
rized in Table V-250.

Table V-251.summarizes the analytical sampling data for  priority


                               473

-------
and  selected conventional and nonconventional pollutants.   Nine
samples  of  metal powder production wet  atomization  wastewater
were collected at five plants.   Elevated concentrations of chro-
mium  (15.0   mg/1),  copper  (295.0 mg/1),  nickel  (81.0  mg/1),
aluminum (5.3 mg/1),  iron (13.3 mg/1) and TSS (2,127 mg/1)  were
detected in the samples.

Metal Powders Tumbling,  Burnishing,  or Cleaning Wastewater.  As
discussedIn  Section  III,  tumbling is an operation  in  which
sintered parts pressed from metal powder are rotated in a  barrel
with  ceramic or metal slugs or abrasives to remove scale,  fins,
or  burrs.   It  may  be done dry or with  an  aqueous  solution.
Burnishing is a surface finishing process in which minute surface
irregularities are displaced rather than removed.  It also can be
done dry or in an aqueous solution.  Pressed parts can be cleaned
in  hot  soapy  water to remove excess  oil  from  oil  quenching
operations.  Water use, wastewater discharge, and current recycle
practices  corresponding  to this waste stream are summarized  in
Table V-252.

Table V-253 summarizes the analytical sampling data for  priority
and  selected conventional and nonconventional pollutants.   Nine
samples  of tumbling,  burnishing,  and cleaning wastewater  were
collected from three streams at one plant.   Elevated  concentra-
tions of copper (253 mg/1),  lead (45.1 mg/1),  zinc (9.56 mg/1),
iron  (211  mg/1),  oil and grease (2,100 mg/1),   and TSS  (3,000
mg/1) were detected in the samples.

Metal Powders Sawing or Grinding Spent Neat Oils.   As  discussed
TnSection III,  sawing or grinding operations may use  mineral-
based  oils or heavy grease as the lubricant required to minimize
friction  and  act as a coolant.   Normally,  saw  oils  are  not
discharged  as a wastewater stream.   Water use,   wastewater dis-
charge, and current recycle practices corresponding to this waste
stream are summarized in Table V-254.                            :

Since none of the plants surveyed reported discharging the sawing
spent neat oils, no samples were collected.

Metal Powders Sawing or Grinding Spent Emulsions.   As  discussed
in Section III, sawing or grinding operations generally require a
lubricant  in  order to minimize friction and act as  a  coolant.
Oil-in-water  emulsions are commonly used as  lubricants.    Water
use,  wastewater discharge,  and current recycle  practices corre-
sponding to this waste stream are summarized in Table V-255.

Table  V-256 summarizes the analytical sampling data for priority
and  selected conventional and nonconventional  pollutants.   Two
samples  of sawing or grinding emulsions were collected from  two
streams  at  one plant.   Elevated concentrations  of  iron  (176,
mg/1),  copper  (1.55  mg/1),  aluminum (7.00 mg/1),  zinc  (3.26
mg/1),  boron (166 mg/1), cyanide (2.5 mg/1), oil and grease (720
mg/1), and TSS (120 mg/1) were detected in the samples.

Metal  Powders  Sawing or Grinding  Contact  Cooling  Water.   As
                               474

-------
discussed in Section III, a lubricant is frequently needed during
sawing and grinding.   Water,  without additives,  is one type of
lubricant  which may be used.   Water use,  wastewater discharge,
and current recycle practices corresponding to this waste  stream
are summarized in Table V-257.

Table  V-258  summarizes the analytical data for  priority  metal
pollutants   and   selected  conventional   and   nonconventional
pollutants.   One  sample  of sawing or grinding contact  cooling
water  was collected at one plant.   Elevated  concentrations  of
copper  (230  mg/1),  aluminum (40 mg/1) and magnesium (11  mg/1)
were detected in this sample.

Metal  Powders Sizing Spent Neat Oils.   As discussed in  Section
III, sizing operations may use mineral-based oils or heavy grease
as  the  lubricant  required to minimize friction and  act  as  a
coolant.   Normally,  sizing oils are not discharged as a  waste-
water  stream.   Water  use,  wastewater discharge,  and  current
recycle  practices corresponding to this waste stream are  summa-
rized in Table V-259.

Since none of the plants surveyed reported discharging the sizing
spent neat oils, no samples were collected.

Metal  Powders Sizing Spent Emulsions.   As discussed in  Section
III,  sizing operations generally require a lubricant in order to
minimize friction and act as a coolant.   Oil-in-water  emulsions
are  commonly  used as lubricants.   Water use,  wastewater  dis-
charge, and current recycle practices corresponding to this waste
stream are summarized in Table V-260.

Since none of the plants surveyed reported discharging the sizing
spent emulsions, no samples were collected.

Metal Powders Steam Treatment Wet Air Pollution Control Slowdown.
As  discussed  in Section III,  steam  treatment  operations  may
require  the use of wet air pollution control devices in order to
meet air quality standards.  Water use, wastewater discharge, and
current recycle practices corresponding to this waste stream  are
summarized in Table V-261.

Table  V-262 summarizes the analytical sampling data for priority
and selected [Conventional and nonconventional pollutants.   Three
samples  of  isteam treatment wet air pollution  control  blowdown
were collected from one stream at one plant.  Elevated '
concentrations  of  oil and grease (42 mg/1) and TSS  (200  mg/1)
were detected in the samples.

Metal  Powders Oil-Resin Impregnation Spent Neat Oils.   As  dis-
cussed  in Section III,  porous parts pressed from metal  powders
may be impregnated with oils or resins.   Normally,  the oils  or
resins  are  not discharged as a wastewater stream.   Water  use,
wastewater discharge, and current recycle practices corresponding
to this waste stream are summarized in Table V-263.
                               475

-------
Since  none of the plants surveyed reported discharging the
or resins/ no samples were collected.
oils
Metal Powders Degreasing Spent Solvents.  As described in Section
III,  solvent  cleaners are used to remove lubricants  (oils  and
greases)  applied  to  the surface of  nonferrous  metals  during
mechanical  forming operations.   Basic solvent cleaning  methods
include  straight vapor degreasing,  immersion-vapor  clegreasing,
spray-vapor degreasing/  ultrasonic vapor degreasing,  emulsified
solvent degreasing/ and cold cleaning.

Solvents most commonly used for all types of vapor degreasing are
trichloroethylene,   1,1,1-trichloroethane,  methylene  chloride,
perchloroethylene/   and  various  chlorofluorocarbons.   Solvent
selection  depends  on the required process temperature  (solvent
boiling  point),  product dimension,  and metal  characteristics.
Contaminated  vapor degreasing solvents are frequently  recovered
by distillation.

Since  none  of the plants surveyed  reported  discharging  spent
degreasing solvents, no samples were collected.

Metal  Powders Hot Pressing Contact Cooling Water.   As discussed
inSection III,  contact cooling water may be used to  cool  hot
pressed  parts  in  order to  facilitate  handling.   Water  use,
wastewater discharge, and current recycle practices corresponding
to this waste stream are summarized in Table V-264.

Table  V-265  summarizes the analytical data for  priority  metal
pollutants   and   selected  conventional   and   nonconventional
pollutants.  One sample of hot pressing contact cooling water was
collected from one plant.  Elevated concentrations of copper {2.2
mg/1), iron (6.3 mg/1), and magnesium (3.5 mg/1) were detected in
this sample.

Metal  Powders  Mixing Wet Air Pollution  Control  Slowdown.   As
discussed  in  Section III,  during the mixing of metal  powders,
particulates may become airborne.   The use of wet air  pollution
control may be necessary in order to meet particulate air quality
standards.   Water use, wastewater discharge, and current recycle
practices  corresponding  to this waste stream are summarized  in
Table V-266.

Table  V-267  summarizes the analytical data for  priority  metal
pollutants   and   selected  conventional   and   nonconventional
pollutants.   One  sample  of mixing wet  air  pollution  control
blowdown  was collected from one plant.   Elevated concentrations
of  copper (1.2 mg/1) and magnesium (4.5 mg/1) were  detected  in
this sample.

Metal  Powders  Operations Which Do Not Use Process  Water.   The
Agency  has not established a discharge allowance for  operations
which do not generate process wastewater.   The following  opera-
tions  generate  no  process wastewater,  because they  use  only
noncontact cooling water or because they use no water at all:
                               476

-------
     Powder Metallurgy Operations (Compacting, Sintering)
     Sanding
     Rolling
     Machining
     Screening
     Blending
     Briquetting
     Crushing, Pulverizing.
Treated Wastewater Samples.   Tables V-268 through V-282  present
the field sampling data for the treated wastewater from 18 of the
25 sampling episodes.   Treated wastewater data for some of these
plants  were  incorpo- rated into the larger data base which  was
used  to  determine  the treatment  effectiveness  for  different
control  systems.   The  treatability  limits  selected  for  the
nonferrous  metals  forming  control  options  are  presented  in
Section VII (Control and Treatment Technology,  Table V1I-21  and
VII-22, pp. 1474 and 1475).
                               477

-------
                                                              Table V-1



                                         NUMBER OF SAMPLES PER WASTE STREAM, BY SUBCATEGORY
*>
Waste Stream
Rolling Spent Neat Oils
Rolling Spent Neat Oils and Graphite-Based Lubricants
Rolling Spent Emulsions
Rolling Contact Cooling Water
Rolling Spent Soap Solutions
Drawing Spent Neat Oils
Drawing Spent Emulsions
Drawing Spent Lubricants
Drawing Spent Soap Solutions
Extrusion Spent Neat Oils
Extrusion Spent Emulsions
Extrusion Spent Lubricants
Extrusions Press and Solution Heat Treatment Contact
Cool ing Water .
Extrusion Press Hydraulic Fluid Leakage
Extrusion Tool Contact Cooling Water
Swaging Spent Neat Oils
Swaging Spent Emulsions
Forging Spent Lubricants
| I | II |III |IV | V | VI |VII |VIII| IX | X | Xl|
* * * * * o
* 0
1 * 4 3 * * 8
8 12 11
* 0
* * * * o
* 1 " 1 * 2
* * 0
1 1 2
* 0
* 0
* * * * Q
1 1 2
1311 1 7
1 1
* 0
1 1
* * * * * o

-------
               Table V-1  (Continued)



NUMBER OF SAMPLES PER WASTE STREAM, BY SUBCATEGORY
Waste Stream
Forging Contact Cooling Water
Forging Equipment Cleaning Wastewater
Forging Press Hydraulic Fluid Leakage
Tube Reducing Spent Lubricants
Metal Powder Production Wet Atomization Wastewater
Metal Powder Production Wastewater
Metal Powder Production Wet Air Pollution Control Slowdown
Metal Powder Production Floor Wash Wastewater
Continuous Strip Casting Contact Cooling Water
Semi-Continuous Ingot Casting Contact -Cool ing Water
Direct Chill Casting Contact Cooling Water
Shot Casting Contact Cooling Water
Stationary Casting Contact Cooling Water
Semi-Continuous and Continuous Casting Contact Cooling
Water
Vacuum Melting Steam Condensate
Annealing and Solution Heat Treatment Contact Cooling
Heat Treatment Contact Cooling Water
Surface Treatment Spent Baths
Surf ace -Treatment Rinsewater
Ammonia Rinsewater
| I | II I III| IV | V | VI |VII |VIII| IX | X | XI |
* 2 11 . 4
* 2 1 2
1 1 2
1 3 26
7*3 9 19
•.-.-••-• ' * " " 0
'* 0
* 0
1 1
O ... 	 _ - .- - . - - - - •- - n
* . 1 1 2
32 5
1 * * i
2 2
1 1
2 * 2
3 53 5 16
3421 3 11 3 18
12 25 7 5 9 31 3 61
1 1

-------
               Table V-1 (Continued)



NUMBER OF SAMPLES PER WASTE STREAM, BV SUBCATEGORY
Waste Stream
Alkaline Cleaning Spent Baths
Alkaline Cleaning Rinsewater
Alkaline Cleaning Prebonding Wastewater
Molten Salt Rinsewater
Tumbling Wastewater
Tumbling, Burnishing Wastewater
^ Tumbling, Burnishing, and Cleaning Wastewater
00
O Sawing, Grinding Spent Neat Oils
Sawing, Grinding Spent Emulsions
Sawing, Grinding Spent Emulsions and Synthetic Coolants
Sawing, Grinding Contact Cooling Water
Sawing, Grinding Rinsewater
Hydrostatic Tube Testing and Ultrasonic Testing Wastewater
Dye Penetrant Testing Wastewater
Inspection, Testing Wastewater
Equipment Cleaning Wastewater
Shot-Forming Wet Air Pollution Control Slowdown
Steam Cleaning Condensate
Area Cleaning Wastewater
|I | II | III| IV | V | VI | VII | VIII| IX | X | XI|
1 4215 23 18
4 5 * * 4 11 15
8 . 8
861 * 14
1 1
46 10
9 9
* * * * * 0
* 12 1 6 1 1 1 2 22
3 3
2 1 * * 1 4
* 2 * 13
* Q
311 5
4 4
3 3
1 1
1 1
3 3

-------
                                                        Table V-1  (Continued)

                                         NUMBER OF SAMPLES PER WASTE STREAM, BY SUBCATEGORY
00
H
                         Waste Stream

      Pressure Bonding-Contact Cooling Water  ~    	

      Sizing Spent Neat Oils

      Sizing Spent Emulsions

      Steam Treatment Wet Air Pollution Control  Slowdown

      Oil-Resin Impregnation Spent Neat Oils

      Miscellaneous Wastewater Sources  	      ... .    . ..
I |  II I  III| IV  I V  | VI  I VII| VIII|  IX  | X  | XI

' ' "	 --,-••                            ,

                                            *     0

                                            *     0

                                            3     3

                                            *     0
Degreasing Spent Solvents
Wet Air Pollution Control Slowdown
Degreasing Rinsewater
Drum Wash Water
Laundry Wash Water
Hot Pressing Contact Cooling Water
Mixing Wet Air Pollution Control Slowdown
* * * * * * * * i * ]
1" 3 * 2 2 1 * 8
14 5
• ----- 1 '• -
1 1
1 1
1 1
      *This waste-stream was reported in dcp responses for plants in this subcategory, but no  raw  wastewater  samples  were
       analyzed.

     **The number of samples by subcategory does not always add to the total number of samples because  some sampled streams
       derive from operations in more than one subcategory.

-------
    The Roman numarlals used to Identify the columns refer to be following



    I    * Lead-Tin-Bismuth Forming



    II   * Magnesium Forming



    III  = Nickel-Cobalt Forming



    IV   = Precious Metals Forming



    V    = Refractory Metals Forming



    VI   = Titanium Forming



    VII  = Uranium Forming



    VIII = Zinc Forming



    IX   = Zirconium Hafnium Forming



    X    = Metal  Powders



    XI   = Total
09

-------
                                            Table V-2

                                  SAMPLE ANALYSIS LABORATORIES
00.
OJ
 Laboratory

 ARO,  Inc.; Tullahoma, TN

 Arthur D. Little;
 Cambridge, MA

 CENTEC; Salem,  VA

 Coors Spectro-Chemical;
 Golden, CO

 Edison Laboratory;
 Edison, NJ

-EPA,  Region III;
 Wheeling, WV

 EPA-ESD,  Region IV;
 Athens, GA

 NUS Corp.; Pittsburgh, PA

 Radian Corp.; Austin, ,TX

 Radian Corp.; Sacramento, CA

 S-Cubed;  San Diego, CA

 Versar, Inc.; Springfield,  VA

 West  Coast Technical  Service,
.Inc. ; Cerritos,  CA
                                     Organics
                                                      Pollutants Analyzed
                                                 Metals    Conventional    Nonconventional
X
X
X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X '.
X


X
X
X
X
X



-------
                 Table V-3

NONPRIORITY POLLUTANTS ANALYZED FOR DURING
SAMPLING EFFORT SUPPORTING THIS REGULATION
               Conventional

       total suspended solids (TSS)
       oil and grease
       pH
              Nonconventional

      acidity
      alkalinity
      aluminum
      ammonia nitrogen
      barium
      biological oxygen demand (BOD)
      boron
      calcium
      chemical oxygen demand (COD)
      chloride
      cobalt
      columbium
      fluoride
      gold
      iron
      magnesium
      manganese
      molybdenum
      nitrate
      phenolics
      phosphate
      phosphorus
      sodium
      sulfate
      tantalum
      tin
      titanium
      total dissolved solids (TDS)
      total organic carbon (TOC)
      total solids (TS)
      tungsten
      uranium
      vanadium
      yttrium
      zirconium
                    484

-------
      '.     Table V;-3 (Continued)

NONPRIORITY POLLUTANTS ANALYZED FOR DURING
SAMPLING EFFORT SUPPORTING THIS REGULATION
          Nonconventional (Cont.)

                radium-226
                gross alpha
                gross beta
                    485

-------
                            Table V-4

             RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES OF SAMPLED
   LEAD AND NICKEL EXTRUSION PRESS AND SOLUTION HEAT TREATMENT
                      CONTACT COOLING WATER
                           Lead      Nickel
      Parameter           (mg/1)     (mg/1)

Oil and Grease              3         7
TSS                         5         3
pH                          7.6       7.4
Antimony                    —**      —
Arsenic                     —        —
Beryllium                   0.001
Cadmium                     0.005
Chromium
Copper                      0.024     0.05
Lead                        0.13
Nickel                      0.007     0.14
Silver
Zinc                        —        0.07
Cyanide              .       0.08
Acidity
Alkalinity                170        55
Aluminum
Ammonia                     0.08      0.13
Fluoride                    0.22      0.83
Iron                        0.023
Magnesium                   —
Sulfate
Titanium                    0.084     00
Total Dissolved Solids
   Treatment
 Effectiveness
LS&F Technology
    (mg/1)*

    10
     2.6

     0.47
     0.34
     0.20
     0.049
     0.07
     0.39
     0.08
     0.22
     0.07
     0.23
     0.047
     1.49
    32.2
     9.67
     0.28
 *From Table VII-21.

**Not found above analytical quantification level or level
  detected in source water.
                              486

-------
                                         Table V-5


                          RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES OF SAMPLED
                 LEAD,  NICKEL,  AND PRECIOUS METALS ROLLING SPENT EMULSIONS
00
Parameter
Oi 1 and Grease
TSS
PH
Antimony
Arsenic
Beryl 1 ium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Si 1 ver
Zinc
Cyanide •
Acidity
Alkal inity
A 1 uminum
Ammonia
Fluoride
Iron
Magnesium
Sulfate
Total Dissolved Solids
Chemical Oxygen Demand
Total Organic Carbon
. Lead
(mg/1)
270
480
7
—
—
—
--
—
' 0
_ . . 29
0
—
1
—
—
310
: : 0
.-..'. 0
0
7
.
59
1 ,020
15,000
1 ,700


.92
**




.25

.003

.4



.35
. 12
.82
.3





Nickel
(mg/1)
3,055
4,870
5
0
0
—
0
3
2
3
21
0
5
—
--
280
. 1
2
4
59
--
370
5,400
52,300
12,300


.96
.003
.013

.02
.23
.93
.13
.9
.006
.55



.28
. 15
.55
.6





Precious
Metals
(mg/1)
587
242
5
0
0
—
0
0
8
0
0
0
2
—
3
1, 170
0
0
0
9
—
3, 140
16,000
367
7,730


.48
.049
.01 1

.06
.03
.72
.49
.36
.07
.16

.3

.15
.16
.96
.73





Effective-
ness LS&F
Techno 1 ogy
(mg/1)*
10
2

•0
0
0
0
0
... 0
0
0
0
0
0


1
32
9
0






.6

.47
.34
.20
.049
.07
,39.
.08
.22
.07
.23
.047


.49
.2
.67
.28





       *From Table VII-21 .   -.

      **Not  found above  analytical  quantification level  or level  detected in source
        water.

-------
                            Table V-6

            LEAD-TIN-BISMUTH ROLLING SPENT EMULSIONS
 Plant

  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7

Average
    Water Use
L/kkg     gal/ton
 1,001
10,170
10,170
10,170
10,170
10,170
    NR

 8,642
  240.0
2,440
2,440
2,440
2,440
2,440
   NR

2,073
Percent
Recycle

  P
  P
  P
  P
  P
  P
 NR
                        Wastewater Discharge
                         L/kkg     gal/ton
 0.37
27.94
27.94
27.94
27.94
27.94
NR

23.35
 0.09
 6.70
 6.70
 6.70
 6.70
 6.70
NR

 5.60
 P - Periodic discharge
NR - Data not reported
                               488

-------
               Table V-7

LEAD-TIN-BISMUTH ROLLING SPENT EMULSIONS
      RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
                                     Concentrations  (mg/1)
Toxic
6.
1 1 .
15.
23.
38.
*» 114.
00
«> 115.
117.
1 18.
1 1 9-.
120.
122.
123.
124.
125.
126.
127.
128.
Pol 1 utant
Pol 1 utants
carbon tet rachl ori de
1 , 1 , 1-trichloro ethane
1 , 1 ,2,2-tetrachloroethane
chl orof orm
ethy 1 benzene
ant imony . . .
arseni c
bery 1 1 i um
cadmi um
chromi um (-total ) 	
copper
1 ead
mercury
nickel
se 1 eni um
si 1 ver
thai Hum
zinc • -
Code Type
A-3 1
A-3 1
A-3 1
A-3 1
A-3 1
A-3 - 1
A-3 1
A-3 1
A-3 - • 1
- A-3 1 --
A-3 1
A-3 1
A-3 1
A-3 1
A-3 . 1
A-3 ' - 1
A-3 1
A-3 1 - -
Source Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
0.006
0.007
0.019
0.006
0.012
<0.003 - <0.003
<0.003 <0.003
<0.005 <0.005
<0.002 . <0.002

-------
                                         Tabltt V-7 (Continued)

                                LEAD-TIN-BISMUTH ROLLING SPENT EMULSIONS
                                      RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
*»
VO
O
           Pollutant


Nonconventional  Pollutants (Continued)



Aluminum


Ammonia Nitrogen


Barium


Boron


Calcium


Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD)


Chioride


Cobalt


Fluoride


Iron


Magnesium


Manganese


Molybdenum


Phosphate


Sodium


Sulfate


Tin


Titanium


Total Dissolved Solids (TDS)


Total Organic Carbon (TOO


Total" Sol ids (TS)


Vanadium
Stream Sample
Code Type
A-3 1
A-3 1
A-3 • 1
A-3 1
A-3 1
A-3 1
A-3 1
A-3 1
A-3 1
A-3 1
A-3 1
A-3 1
A-3 1
A-3 1
A-3 1
A-3 1
A-3 1
A-3 1
A-3 1
A-3 1
A-3 1
A-3 1
Concentrations (mg/1)
Source Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
<0.050 0.35
0. 12
0.15 0.009
<0.009 <0.009
69 67
15,000
50
<0.006 <0.006
0.82
<0.08 7.3
27 16
<0.001 0.053
<0.002 <0.002
59
10 88
59
<0 . 1 2 <0 . 1 2
<0.005 <0.005
1 ,020
1 ,700
3,800
<0.003 <0.003

-------
                                         Table V-7 (Continued)

                                LEAD-TIN-BISMUTH ROLLING SPENT EMULSIONS
                                      RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
                 Pollutant
                                             Stream
                                              Code
Sample
 Type
                                                                 Source
Concentrations (mg/1)
                                                                           Day  1
               Day 2
Day 3
      Nonconventlonal Pollutants (Continued)
      Yttrium
                                              A-3
                                                                 <0.002   <0.002
IO
H
      Conventional Pollutants

      Oi1 and Grease

      Total Suspended Solids (TSS)

      pH (standard units)
A-3 1
A-3 1
A-3 1
<1 270
23 • 480
7.92
      1.  The following toxic pollutants were not detected in this waste stream:   1-5, 7-10
          12-14, 16-22, 24-37, and 39-88.

      2.  No analyses were performed on the following toxic pollutants:  89-113,  116,  121,
          and 129.

-------
                  Table V-8




LEAD-TIN-BISMUTH ROLLING SPENT SOAP SOLUTIONS
Plant
1
Average
Water
L/kkg
43.0
43.0
Use
gal/ton
10.3
10.3
Percent
Recycle
0.0

Wastewater
L/kkg
43.0
43.0
Disch
gal/t
10.3
10.3
                     492

-------
                                                                         1
                            Table V-9

            LEAD-TIN-BISMUTH DRAWING SPENT NEAT OILS
 Plant

  1
  2
  3

Average
    Water Use
L/kkg     gal/ton
    NR
    NR
    NR

    NR
NR
NR
NR

NR
Percent
Recycle

100
100
  P
                     Wastewater Discharge
                      L/kkg     gal/ton
 0.00
 0.00
NR

 0.00
 0.00
 0.00
NR

 0.00
 P - Periodic discharge
NR - Data not reported
                               493

-------
                           Table V-10

            LEAD-TIN-BISMUTH DRAWING SPENT EMULSIONS
 Plant

  3
  3
  4
  5
  6
  1
  1
  2
      Water Use
  L/kkg     gal/ton
   181.8
   487.9
24,520
    NR
    26.27
    NR
    NR
    NR
Average   6,304
   43.60
  117.0
5,880
   NR
    6.30
   NR
   NR
   NR

1,512
Percent
Recycle

100
100
100
100
  P
  P
  P
  P
                        Wastewater Discharge
                         L/kkg     gal/ton,
 0.00
 0.00
 0.00
 0.00
26.27
NR
NR
NR

26.27
 0.00
 0.00
 0.00
 0.00
 6.30
NR
NR
NR

 6.30
 P - Periodic discharge
NR - Data not reported
                                494

-------
                                                                         1
                           Table V-ll

          LEAD-TIN-BISMUTH DRAWING SPENT SOAP SOLUTIONS
 Plant

  1
  2

Average
    Water Use
L/kkg     gal/ton
  NR
   7.46

   7.46
NR
 1.79

 1.79
Percent
Recycle

100
  P
                     Wastewater Discharge
                      L/kkg     gal/ton
0.00
7.46

7.46
0.00
1.79

1.79
 P - Periodic discharge
NR - Data not reported
                               495

-------
VD
                                               Table V-12

                             LEAD-TIN-BISMUTH DRAWING SPENT SOAP SOLUTIONS
                                      RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
Pol lutant
Toxic Pol lutants
1 14. antimony
117. beryllium
118. cadmi urn
119. chromium (total)

120. copper
122. lead
124. nickel
126. silver
128. zinc
Nonconvent i onal Pollutants
Stream
Code

AZ-1
AZ-1
AZ-1
AZ-1
AZ-1

AZ-1
AZ-1
AZ-1
AZ-1

Samel e Concentrations (mg/1)
Type Source Day 1 Day 2 Day 3

21 .0
1 .0
1 .0
1.0
11.0

3,100.0
1 .0
1 .0
230.0

      Tin


      Conventional Pol 1utants

      Oi 1 and Grease

      Total Suspended Solids  (TSS)

      PH
AZ-1





AZ-1

AZ-1

AZ-1
    1,600.0





- 353,000.0

- 294,000.0

         9.2
       1 .   No

-------
                         :  Table V-13

                        LEAD-TIN-BISMUTH
       EXTRUSION PRESS OR SOLUTION HEAT TREATMENT CONTACT
                         1 COOLING WATER
Plant
1
1
2
3'
4
5
6
7
8
9
8
10
11
4
12
13
14
Water Use
L/kkg gal/ton
92.
60.
3.
78.
102.
117.
200.
325.
NR
1,024
NR
1,405
1,784
2,340
7,064
NR
2,085
56
05
34
65
5
6
2
3









22.
14.
0.
18.
24.
28.
48.
78.
NR
245.
NR
337.
427.
561.
1,694
NR
500.
20
40
80
86
58
19
00
00

6

0
9
1


0
Percent
Recycle
100
100
100
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
NR
0.
NR
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
P



0
0
0
0
0

0

0
0
0
0
0

Wastewater Discharge
L/kkg gal/ton
0.
0.
0.
78.
102.
117.
200.
325.
740.
1,024
1,111
1,405
1,784
2,340
7,064
NR
NR
00
00
00
65
5
6
2
3
6








0.
0.
0.
18.
24.
28.
48.
78.
177.
245.
266.
337.
427.
561.
1,694
NR
NR
00
00
00
86
58
19
00
00
6
6
4
0
9
1



Average   1,192
285.8
1,358
325.6
 P - Periodic discharge
NR - Data not reported
                               497

-------
                                               Table V-14

           LEAD-TIN-BISMUTH EXTRUSIONS PRESS AND SOLUTION HEAT TREATMENT CONTACT COOLING WATER
                                      RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
00
Toxic
4.
23.
44.
114.
115.
117.
118.
1 19.
120.
121 .
122.
123.
124.
125.
126.
127.
128.
Pol lutant
Pol lutants
benzene
chl orof orm
methylene chloride
antimony
arsenic
beryl 1 ium
cadmium
chromium (total)
copper
cyanide ( total )
lead*
mercury
nickel
sel eni um
si 1 ver
thai 1 i um
zinc
Stream
Code
C-2
C-2
C-2
C-2
C-2
C-2
C-2
C-2
C-2
C-2
C-2
C-2
C-2
C-2
C-2
C-2
C-2
Sample
Concentrations (mg/1)
Type Source
1 0.002
1 0
1 0
1 <0
1 " <0
1 <0
1 0
1 4
1 <0
1 0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
.073
.011
.003
.003
.005
.006
.0
.001
.071
.084
.0002
.003
.003
.001
.002
.003
Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
0.004
0.051
ND
<0.003
<0.003
0.001
0.005
4.6
0.024
0.08
0.13
<0.0002
0.007
<0.003
<0.001
<0.002
<0.003
Nonconvent i ona 1 Pollutants
Acidi
Al kal
ty
inity
Al uminum
C-2
C-2
C-2
1 <1
1 169
1 <0


.050
<1
170
<0.050

-------
                                        Table V-14  (Continued)
          LEAD-TIN-BISMUTH EXTRUSIONS PRESS AND SOLUTION HEAT TREATMENT  CONTACT COOLING WATER
                                     RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
                Pol 1 utant-
ID
VO
Nonconventional Pollutants  (Continued)


Ammonia Nitrogen

Barium

Boron

Calci urn

Chemical Oxygen Demand  (COD)

Chloride

Cobalt

Fluoride              .......

Iron

Magnesium

Manganese

Mo 1ybdenum

Phenolies

Phosphate

Sodium

Sulfate  .       .   .

Tin

Ti tani urn

Total Dissolved Solids  (TDS)

Total Organic Carbon (TOO

Total Solids (TS)             ;

Vanadium
Stream
Code
C-2
C-2
C-2
C-2
C-2
C-2
C-2
C-2 -
C-2
C-2
C-2
C-2
C-2
C-2
C-2
C-2
C-2
C-2
C-2
C-2
C-2
C-2
Sample Concentrations (mg/1)
-Type Source
1 0.11
1 0. 13
1 0,34
1 110
1 <5
1 120
1 <0.006
1 0.17
1 0.025
1 24
1 0.51
1 <0.002
1 0.69
1 <4
1 66
1 _ 290
1 <0.12
1 <0.005
1 800
1 2
1 810
1 0.025
- Day 1 Day 2. Day 3
0.08
0
0
110
<5
"660
0
0
0
24
0
0
<0
10
67
290
<0
0
770
<1
800
0
. 13
.60



. 007
.22-
.023

.22
.012
.005



.12
.084



.093

-------
                                   Table V-14 (Continued)

     LEAD-TIN-BISMUTH EXTRUSIONS PRESS AND SOLUTION HEAT TREATMENT CONTACT COOLING WATER
                                RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA



Ul
o
o
Stream Sample Concentrations (mcj/1)
Pollutant Code Type Source Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
Nonconventional Pollutants (Continued)
Yttrium C-2 1 <0.002 0.007
Conventional Pollutants
Oil C-2 1 4 3
Total Suspended Solids (TSS) C-2 1 9 5
pH (standard units) C-2 1 7.30 7.60
1.   The following toxic pollutants were not detected in this waste stream:   1-3,  5-22,
    24-43,  and 45-88.

2.   No analyses were performed on the following toxic pollutants:   89-113,  116,  and 129.

-------
             I            -  Table V-15

    LEAD-TIN-BISMUTH EXTRUSION PRESS HYDRAULIC FLUID LEAKAGE
 Plant

  1
  2 .

Average
    Water Use
L/kkg     gal/ton
  NR
  NR

  NR
NR
NR

NR
Percent
Recycle

100
 NR
                     Wastewater Discharge
                      L/kkg     gal/ton
 0.00
55.02

55.02
 0.00
13.19

13.19
NR - Data not reported
                               501

-------
                           Table V-16

            LEAD-TIN-BISMUTH SWAGING SPENT EMULSIONS
 Plant

  1
  2
  3
  3

Average
    Water Use
L/kkg     gal/ton
  NR
  NR
   2.93
   1.77

   2.35
NR
NR
 0.70
 0.42

 0.56
Percent
Recycle

100
100
100
  P
                     Wastewater Discharge
                      L/kkg     gal/ton
0.00
0.00
0.00
1..77

1.77
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.42

0.42
 P - Periodic discharge
NR - Data not reported
                               502

-------
                           Table V-17

            LEAD-TIN-BISMUTH CONTINUOUS STRIP .CASTING
                      CONTACT COOLING WATER
 Plant

  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
     Water Use
 L/kkg     gal/ton
5,080
5, 080
5,080
5,080
5,080
Average   5,080
1,218
1,218
1,218
1,218
1,218

1,218
Percent
Recycle

  P
  P
  P
  P
  P
                        Wastewater Discharge
                         L/kkg     gal/ton
1
1
1
1
1,
00
00
00
00
00
                                     1.00
0.24
0.24
0.24
0.24
0.24

0.24
P - Periodic discharge
                               503

-------
                          Table V-18

LEAD-TIN-BISMUTH CONTINUOUS STRIP CASTING CONTACT COOLING WATER
                 RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
Pol lutant
Toxic Pol lutants
117. beryl 1 ium
118. cadmium
119. chromium (total)
120. copper
122. lead
124. nickel
cn
O 128. zinc
*>•
Nonconvent i onal Pollutants
Al urninum
Bari urn
Boron
Cal cium
Cobalt
Iron
Magnesi um
Manganese- . . _ . . ...
Mo 1 ybdenum
Sodium
Tin
1 i tanium
Vanadium
Stream
Code

A-2
A-2
A-2
A-2
A-2
A-2
A-2
A-2
A-2
A-2
A-2
A-2
A-2
A-2 '
A-2
A-2
A-2
A-2
A-2
A-2
Samp 1 e
Concentrations (mg/1)
Type Source
1 <0.
1 <0.
1 <0.
1 <0.
1 <0.
1 <0.
1 0.
1 <0.
1 0.
1 <0.
1 69
1 <0.
1 <0.
1 27
1 <0.
1 <0.
1 10
1 <0.
1 <0.
1 <0.
005
002
001
001
084
003
72
050
15
009

006
008

001
002

12
005
003
Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
<0
0
0
0
1
0
3
0
0
0
4
0
3
0
- 0
0
160
<0
0
0
.005
.012
.009
.41
.2
. 13
. 1
.54
.001
.056
.6
.018
.5
.91
.055
.006

. 12
.010
.011

-------
                                          Table V-18 (Continued)

                      LEAD-TIN-BISMUTH CONTINUOUS STRIP CASTING CONTACT COOLING WATER
                                       RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
                  Pol 1utant
                                              Stream
                                               Code
                   	Concentrations (mg/1)
                   Source    Day 1    Day 2
       Nonconventional  Pol 1utants (Continued)

       Yttrium                                 A-2
                   <0.002
                                                                            0.002
(Jl
o
Ul
       Conventional  Pollutants

       Oi1  and Grease

       Total  Suspended Solids (TSS)

       pH  (standard  units)
A-2

A-2

A-2
1    - •   - < 1

1        23

1
       -1 .   No analyses were performed on the following toxic pollutants:  1-116, 121, and
           129.                             .

-------
                           Table V-19

                        LEAD-TIN-BISMUTH
       SEMI-CONTINUOUS INGOT CASTING CONTACT COOLING WATER
Plant
1
2
3
Water Use
L/kkg gal/ton
29.36 7.04
NR NR
NR NR
Percent
Recycle
0.0
0.0
NR
Wastewater Discharge
L/kkg gal/ton
29.36 7.04
NR NR
NR NR
Average
        29.36
7.04
29.36
7.04
NR
Data not reported
                               506

-------
                             Table V-20

LEAD-TIN-BISMUTH SEMI-CONTINUOUS INGOT CASTING CONTACT COOLING WATER
                    RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA



Pol lutant
Stream
Code
Satnpl e
Type
Concentrations (mg/O
Source
Day 1
Day 2 Day 3
Toxic Pol lutants
1 1 .
28.
72.
114.
1 15.
s
-J
1 18.
119.
120.
121 .
122.
123.
124.
125.
126.
127.
1 28 .
1 , 1 , 1-trichl o roe thane
3,3 '-dichl orobenzidine
benzo (a) anthracene
ant imony
arseni c
bery 1 1 i urn

cadmi urn
chromium (total )
copper
cyanide (total )
1 ead
mercury
nickel
sel eni urn
si 1 ver
thai 1 ium
zi nc • '
B-3
B-3
B-3
B-3
B-3
B-3

B-3
: B-3
B-3
B-3
B-3
B-3
: B-3
B-3
B-3,
B-3
B-3
1
2
2
2
2
2

2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
0.003
0.039
0.061
<0.010
<0.010
<0.005

<0.020
<0.020
<0.0050
<0.02
<0.050
<0.0002
<0.050
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.020
ND
ND
ND
0.290
0.030
<0.005

<0.020
<0.020
<0.050
<0.02
1 . 10
<0.0002
<0.050
<0.010
<0.010
<0 . 010
0.060
ND
ND
ND
0. 180
0.020 "
<0.005

<0.020
<0.020
<0.050
<0.02
0.850
<0.0002
<0.050
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
0.060
Nonconvent i onal Pollutants
Acidity
Alkal
i ni ty
Al umi num
B-3
B-3
B-3
2
2
2
<1
240
<0.100
mm^^m
<1
220
<0 . 100
^^^m
<1
210
<0. 100
^^^••••1

-------
in
o
00
                                           Table V-20 (Continued)


                    LEAD-TIN-BISMUTH SEMI-CONTINUOUS INGOT CASTING CONTACT COOLING WATER
                                        RAW WASTEWATgR SAMPLING DATA
           Pollutant


Nonconventional  Pollutants (Continued)



Ammonia Nitrogen


Barium


Boron


Calcium


Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD)


Chloride


Cobalt


Fluoride


I ron


Magnesi um


Manganese


Molybdenum


Phenoli cs


Phosphate


Sodium


Sulfate


Tin


Ti tani um


Total Dissolved Solids (TDS)


Total Organic Carbon (TOC)


Total Solids  (TS)


Vanadium
Stream
Code
B-3
B-3
B-3
B-3
B-3
B-3
B-3
B-3
B-3
B-3
B-3
B-3
B-3
B-3
B-3
B-3
B-3
B-3
B-3
B-3
B-3
B-3
Sample
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Concentrations (mg/1)
Source
<0
<0
62
<5
6
<0
1
1
19
0
<0
0
56
6
7
<0
<0
390
12
490
<0
.050
. 100
.0


.050
.2
.00
.7
. 100
.050
.010

.80
.8
.050
.050



.050
Day 1
0. 100
<0. 100
54.8
6.5
23
<0.050
0.26
0.800
17. 1
<0.050
<0.050
0.007
<4
21 .7
5. 1
<0.050
<0.050
224
<1
230
<0.050
Day 2 Day 3
0. 100
<0. 100
55.7
<5
23
<0.050
0.27
0.550
17.4
<0.050
<0.050
<0.005
<4
21.0
.1 1
<0. 050
<0.050
370
9
470
<0.050

-------
                                   Table V-20 (Continued)

            LEAD-TIN-BISMUTH SEMI-CONTINUOUS INGOT CASTING CONTACT COOLING WATER
                                RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
           Pol 1utant
Stream    Sample
 Code      Type
                                                               Concentrations (mg/1)
Nonconvent i ona) Pollutants (Continued)





(Jl
O
VD
Yttrium
Conventional Pollutants
Oi 1 and Grease
Total Suspended Sol ids (TSS.)
pH (standard units)



B-3 2 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050

B-3 1 15 4 <1
B-3 2 110 <1 80
B-3 2 7.43 8.20 7.82



1.   The following toxic pollutants were not detected in this waste stream:  1-10, 12-27,
    29-71,  and 73-88.

2.   No analyses were performed on the following toxic pollutants:  89-113, 116, and 129.

-------
                           Table V-21

       LEAD-TIN-BISMUTH SHOT CASTING CONTACT COOLING WATER
Plant
1
2
3
Water
L/kkg
NR
NR
40.84
Use
gal/ton
NR
NR
9.79
Percent
Recycle
NR
P
P
Wastewater
L/kkg
0.00
33.82
40.84
Discharge
gal/ton
0.00
8.11
9.79
Average
40.84
9.79
37.33
8.95
 P - Periodic discharge
NR - Data not reported
                              510

-------
                     Table -V-22

LEAD-TIN-BISMUTH SHOT CASTING CONTACT COOLING WATER
            RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
Tox i c
28.
65.
1 14.
115.
U1
H H7.
H
1 18.
1 19.
120.
121 .
122.
123.
124.
125.
126.
127.
128.
Pol lutant
Pol 1 utants
3,3'~dichlorobenzidine
phenol
antimony
arsenic
beryl 1 i um
cadmium
chromi um (total )
copper-
cyanide (total )
lead
mercury
ni ckel
se 1 eni um
si 1 ver
thai 1 i um
zinc
Stream
Code
B-2
B-2
B-2
- B-2
B-2
B-2
B-2
B-2
B-2
B-2
B-2
B-2 '
B-2
B-2
B-2
B-2
Sampl e
Concentrations (mg/1)
Type Source
1 0
1
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
.039
ND
.010
.010
.005
.020
.020
.050
.02
.050
.0002
.050
.010
.010
.010
.020
Day 1
ND

2
0
<0
<0

-------
                                    Table v-22 (Continued)

                     LEAu-TIN-BISMUTH SHOT CASTING CONTACT COOLING WATER
                                 RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
           Pollutant

Nonconvent1onaI  Po11utants (Continued)


Ammonia Nitrogen

Barium

Boron

Cal ciuin

Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD)

Chi oride

Cobalt

Fluoride

Iron

Magnesium

Manganese

Mo 1ybdenum

Pheno1i cs

Phosphate

Sodium

Sulfate

Tin

Titanium

Total Dissolved Solids (TDS)

Total Organic Carbon (TOC)

Total Solids (TS)

Vanadium
Stream
Code
B-2
B-2
B-2
B-2
B-2
B-2
B-2
B-2
B-2
B-2
B-2
B-2
B-2
B-2
B-2
B-2
B-2
B-2
B-2
B-2
B-2
B-2
Sample
Concentrations (mg/1)
Type Source
1 <1
1 <0
1 <0
1 62
1 <5
1 6
1 <0
1 1
1 1
1 19
1 0
1 <0
1 0
1 56
1 6
1 7
1 - <0
1 <0
1 390
1 12
1 490
1 <0
.050
.100
.0
2

.050
.2
.00
.7
. 100
.050
.010

.8
.80
.050
.050
1

1
.050
Day 1
<1
0.200
0. 100
88.6
,700 1
64 .
<0.050
0.40
2. 10
52.2
0.050
<0.050
0.115
<4
133
200
1-0.5
<0.050
,500
530
,730 1
<0.050
Day 2
<1
0. 150
0. 100
73.0
,560 2
47
<0.050
0.33
2.50
21 .9
<0.050
<0.050
0. 10
<4
90.5
180
6.20
<0.050
920
340
,490 2
<0.050
pay 3
0.36
0
0
82
.840
75
<0
0
1
24
<0
<0
0
<4
127
270
10
<0
910
560
, 100
<0
. 150
. 100
.5


.050
.88
.20
.0
.050
.050
.090



.4
.050



.050

-------
Ul
M
U)
                                          Table V-22 (Continued)

                           LEAD-TIN-BISMUTH SHOT CASTING CONTACT COOLING WATER
                                       RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
                 Pol]utant
                                             Stream
                                              Code
      Nonconventional  Pollutants (Continued)
	Concentrations  (mg/1)
Source    Day  1     Day  2
      Yttrium
                                              B-2
                                                                 <0.050   <0.050
                                                                                   <0.050
                                                                                            <0.050
      Conventional  Pollutants

      Oi1  and  Grease

      Total  Suspended  Solids  (TS-S)

      pH  (standard  units)
B-2
B-2
B-2
1 15
-1 . - 110
1 7.43
14
210
9.20
9
420
8.82
22
230
8.93
      1.   No  analyses  were performed on the following toxic pollutants:  2-4, 6,  7,  10,  11,  1.3-17,
          19,  23,  29,  30,  32,  33,  38,  44-51,  85-113,  116,  and 129.

      2.   The  following toxic  pollutants were not detected in this waste stream:   1,'5,  8, 9,  12,
          18,  20,  21,  22,  24,  25-27, 31, 34-37,  39-43,  52-64, and 66-84.

-------
                           Table V-23

                        LEAD-TIN-BISMUTH
         SHOT-FORMING WET AIR POLLUTION CONTROL SLOWDOWN
 Plant

  1

Average
    Water Use
L/kkg     gal/ton
 588

 588
141

141
Percent
Recycle

  0.0
                      Wastewater Discharge
                       L/kkg     gal/ton
588

588
141

141
                              514

-------
      :   Table V-24    '  ';

      LEAD-TIN-BISMUTH
ALKALINE CLEANING SPENT BATHS
            Water Discharge
 Plant   .  L/kkg     gal/ton

  1         17.95      4.30
  2         40.55      9.72
  3 -        48.18     11.55
  3   •'     120.1      28.81
  4        196.0      47.00
  4        294.0      70.50

Average    119.5      28.65
            515

-------
                                              Table V-25
                            LEAD-TIN-BISMUTH ALKALINE CLEANING SPENT BATHS
                                     RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
H
O\
           Pollutant

Toxic Pollutants

 22.  p-chloro-m-cresol

 28.  3,3'-dich1orobenzidine

 66.  bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate

 72.  benzo(a)anthracene

 81.  phenanthrene

114.  ant imony

115.  arsenic

117.  beryl 1iurn

118.  cadmium

119.  chromium (total)

120.  copper

121.  cyanide (total)

122.  lead

123.  mercury

124.  nickel

125.  selenium

126.  si 1ver

127.  thallium

128.  zinc
Stream
Code
B-4
B-4
B-4
B-4
B-4
B-4
B-4
B-4
B-4
B-4
B-4
B-4
B-4
B-4
B-4
B-4
B-4
B-4
B-4
Sample Concentrations (mg/1)
Type Source
1 ND
1 o". 039
1 ND
1 0.061
1 ND
1 <0.010
1 <0.010
1 <0.005
1 <0.020
1 <0.020
1 <0.050
1 <0.02
1 <0.050
1 <0.0002
1 <0.050
1 <0.010
1 <0.010
1 <0.010
1 <0.020
Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
0.040
ND
0.077
ND
0.046
7.30
0. 150
<0.005
<0.020
<0.020
0.150
<0.02
183
<0.0002
<0.050
<0.020
<0.010
<0.010
0.160

-------
                                        Table V-25  (Continued)

                            LEAD-TIN-BISMUTH ALKALINE  CLEANING  SPENT BATHS
                                     RAW WASTEWATER  SAMPLING  DATA
U1
Pol 1 utant
Nonconvent i onal Pollutants
Ac idi ty
Al kal ini ty
Al uminum
Ammonia Nitrogen
Bari um
Boron
Cat ci um
Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD)
Chi oride
Cobalt
Fl uoride
Iron
Magnesium
Manganese
Mo 1 ybdenum
Phenol ics
Phosphate
Sodium
Suifate
Tin
Titanium
Total Dissolved Solids (TDS)
Stream
Code
B-4
B-4
B-4
B-4
B-4
B-4
B-4
B-4
B-4
B-4
B-4
B-4
B-4
B-4
B-4
B-4
B-4
B-4
B-4
B-4
B-4
B-4
Sample
Concentrations (mg/1)
Type Source
1 <1
1 240
1 <0
1 <1
1 <0
1 <0
1 62
1 <5
1 6
1 <0
1 1
1 1
1 19
1 0
1 <0
1 0
1 56
1 6
1 7
1 <0
1 <0
1 390


.100

.050
. 100
.0


.050
.2
.00
.7
.100
.050
.010

.80
.8
.050
.050
3
Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
850
0
<1
<0
0
64
71
39
<0
0
1
24
0
<0
0
580
906
60
<0
<0
,500

.200

.150
.200
. 1


.050
.34
.15
.8
.100
.050
.030



.050
.050


-------
                                        Table V-25  (Continued)

                            LEAD-TIN-BISMUTH ALKALINE CLEANING SPENT BATHS
                                     RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
               Pollutant


    Nonconventional Pollutants  (Continued)


    Total Organic Carbon  (TOC)

    Total Solids (TS)

    Vanadium

    Yttrium


    Conventional Pollutants

    Oi1 and Grease

09   Total Suspended Solids (TSS)

    pH  (standard units)
(Jl
H
Stream
Code
B-4
B-4
B-4
B-4
B-4
B-4
B-4
Samp 1 8
Type
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Concentrations (mg/1)
Source
12
490 4
<0.050
<0.050
15
110
7.43
Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
46
,000
<0.050
<0.050
600
560
8.31
     1.  No analyses were performed  on  the  following  toxic  pollutants:   2-4,  6, '7,  10,  11,
        13-17,  19, 23,  29,  30,  32,  33,  38,  44-51,  85-113,  116,  and  129.

     2.  The following  toxic pollutants  were not  detected  in  this  waste  stream:   1,  5,  8,  9,
        12, 18,  20, 21, 24-27,  31,  34-37,  39-43,  52-65, 67-71,  73-80, and  82-84.

-------
                           Table V-26

            LEAD-TIN-BISMUTH ALKALINE CLEANING RINSE
 Plant

  1
  2
  3
  1
     Water Use :
 L/kkg     gal/ton
   48.4
  371.
4,300
4,710
Average   27357
   11.6
   89.0
1,030
1,130

  565
Percent
Recycle

  0.0
  0.0
  0.0
  0.0
                        Wastewater Discharge
                         L/kkg     gal/ton
   48.4
  371
4,300
4,710

2,357
   11.6
   89.0
1,030
1,130

  565
                               519

-------
                                                  Table V-27


                                   LEAD-TIN-BISMUTH ALKAUINE CLEANING RINSE
                                         RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
to
o
           Pollutant


Toxic Pollutants



 28.  3,3'-dichlorobenzidine



 72.  benzo(a)anthracene



 114.  ant imony



 115.  arsenic



 117.  beryllium



 118.  cadmium



 119.  chromium  (total)



 120.  copper



 121.  cyanide (total)



 122.   lead



 123.  mercury



 124.  nickel



 125.   selenium



 126.   silver
Stream
Code
B-5
B-6
B-5
B-6
B-5
B-6
B-5
B-6
B-5
B-6
B-5
B-6
B-5
B-6
B-5
B-6
B-5
B-6
B-5
B-6
B-5
B-6
B-5
B-6
B-5
8-6
B-5
B-6
Samp 1 e

2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
Concentrations (mg/1)
Source Day 1 Day 2
0.039 ND ND
0.039
0.061 ND ND
0.061
<0.010 0.440 0.650
<0.010
<0.010 <0.010 0.010
<0.010
<0.005 <0.005 <0.005
<0.005
<0.020 <0.020 <0.020
<0.020
<0.020 <0.020 <0.020
<0.020
<0.050 <0.050 <0.050
<0.050
<0.02 <0.02 <0.02
<0.02
<0.050 9.55 8.85
<0.050
<0.0002 <0.0002 0.005
<0.0002
<0.050 <0.050 . <0.050
<0.050
<0.010 <0.010 <0.010
<0.010
<0.010 <0.010 <0.010
<0.010

Day 3
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.650
1 . 10
0.010
0.020
<0.005
<0.005
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.050
0.300
<0.02
<0.02
Ib.ti
40.8
<0.0002
0.0007
<0.050
<0.050
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010

-------
                                            Table V-27 (Continued)

                                   LEAD-TIN-BISMUTH ALKALINE CLEANING'RINSE
                                         RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA.
(Jl
NJ
           Pol 1utant


Toxic Pol 1utants (Continued)

127.  thai Hum


128.  zinc


Nonconvent ional Pol 1utants

Acidity


Alkalini ty


Aluminum


Ammonia Nitrogen


Bari um


Boron


Calci um


Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD)


Chloride


Cobalt


Fluoride


Iron
Stream
Code
B-5
B-6
B-5
B-6
B-5
B-6
B-5
B-6
B-5
B-6
B-5
B-6
B-5
B-6
B-5
B-'6
B-5
B-6
B-5
B-6
B-5
B-6
B-5
B-6
B-5
B-6
B-5
B-6
Sample
Type
2
1
2
1
2
1..
2
1
2
1
2
1 - --
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
Concentrations (mg/1)
Source Day 1 Day 2
<0.010 <0.010 <0.010
<0".010
<0.020 <0.020 <0.020
<0 . 020
<1 <1 <1
- <1 . -
240 290 300
240

-------
                                           Table V-27 (Continued)

                                  LEAD-TIN-BISMUTH ALKALINE CLEANING RINSE
                                        RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
Ul
NJ
NJ
           Pollutant


Nonconventi onal Pollutants (Continued)

Magnesium


Manganese


Molybdenum


Phenolics


Phosphate


Sodium


Sulfate


Tin


Ti tani um


Total Dissolved Solids  (TDS)


Total Organic Carbon (TOC)


Total Solids  (TS)


Vanadium


Yttrium-
Stream
Code
B-5
B-6
B-5
B-6
B-5
B-6
B-5
B-6
B-5
B-6
B-5
B-6
B-5
B-6
B-5
B-6
B-5
B-6
B-5
B-6
B-5
B-6
B-5
B-6
B-5
B-6
B-5
B-6
Sample
Type
2
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
Concentrations (mg/1)
Source
19.7
19.7
0.100
0.100
<0.050
<0.050
0.010
0.010
56
56
6.80
6.80
7.8
7.8
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
390
390
12
12
490
490
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
Day 1
14. 1
<0.050
<0.050
<0.005
8.6
70.0
5.7
<0.050
<0.050
370
21
386
<0.050
<0.050
Day 2
12. 1
<0.050
<0.050
<0.005
13
95.3
14
<0.050
<0.050
520
22
810 1
1
<0.050
<0.050
Day 3
10.4
11 .5
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.005
<0.005
130
<4
253
221
<0.5
<0.5
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
730
730
25
125
,060
, 140
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050

-------
                                           Table V-27  (Continued)

                                   LEAD-TIN-BISMUTH ALKALINE CLEANING  RINSE
                                         RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING  DATA
                   Pol 1utant
                                               Stream
                                                Code
	Concentrations  (mg/1)
Source    Day  1     Day 2
        Conventional  Pollutants

        Oi1 and Grease


        Total  Suspended  Solids  (TSS)


        pH  (standard  units)
B-5
B-6
B-5
B-6
B-5
B-6
1
1
2
1
2
1
15
15
1 10
1 10
7.43
7.43
         <1
                  160
          9.50     9.21
 13
 12

260
200

  9.02
 10.0
U1
NJ
LO
        1.  No analyses were  performed  on  the following toxic pollutants:   2-4,  6,  7,  10,  11,  13-17,
           19,  23,  29, 30, 32,  33,  38, 44-51, 85-113,  116, and  129.

        2.  The  following  toxic  pollutants were not detected in  this  waste  stream:   1,  5,  8,  9,  12,
           18,  20-22, 24-27, 31,  34-37, 39-43, 52-71, and 73-84.

-------
                            Table V-28

                MAGNESIUM ROLLING SPENT EMULSIONS
Plant

    1
      Water Use
  1/kkg     gal/ton
 40,000

107,000
 9,600

25,600
Percent
Recycle

  (P)

  (P)
                       Wastewater Discharge
                        1/kkg      gal/ton
NR (CH)

NR (CH)
NR (CH)

NR (CH)
CH - Contract hauled
 P - Periodic discharge
NR - Data not reported
                                524

-------
                            Table V-29

               MAGNESIUM GORGING SPENT LUBRICANTS
Plant
l
2
3
4 '
Water
1/kkg
2.11
6.80
105 .
NR
Use
gal/ton
0.505
1.63
25.1
NR :
Percent
Recycle
0, (-fc)
0 ( + )
0 ( + )
0 ( + )
Wastewater Dis
1/kkg ga
0
0
0
0
ch.
V
0
0
0
0
 + - Loss due to evaporation, consumption, and drag-out
NR - Data not reported
                               525

-------
                           Table V-30

             MAGNESIUM FORGING CONTACT COOLING WATER
Plant
1
2
3
Water Use
1/kkg gal/ton
NR
318
6,550
NR
76.2
1,570
Percent
Recycle
100 (+)
0
0 ( + )
Wastewater
1/kkg
0
318
5,460
Discharge
gal/ton
0
76.
1,310


2

NR - Data not reported
 + - Loss due to evaporation
                               526

-------
                            Table"V-31

         MAGNESIUM FORGING EQUIPMENT CLEANING WASTEWATER
Plant

  1
    Water Use
1/kkg     gal/ton
 13-.7

 66.1
 3.2iB

15.9'
Percent
Recycle

   0

   0
                       Wastewater Discharge
                        1/kkg      gal/ton.
13.7

66.1
 3.28

15.9
                               527

-------
                      Table V-32




MAGNESIUM DIRECT CHILL CASTING CONTACT COOLING  WATER
Plant
1
2
Water
1/kkg
8,340
3,950
Use
gal/ton
2,000
947
Percent
Recycle
100
0
Wastewater
1/kkg
0
3,950
Discharg
gal/ton
0
947
                          528

-------
                          - T.able V-33

             MAGNESIUM SURFACE TREATMENT SPENT BATHS
           Plant

             1
    Wastewater
1/kkg      gal/ton
 NR

-NR

 NR

 NR

 NR (CH)

 NR (CH)

122

380

897
 NR

 NR

 NR

 NR

 NR (CH)

 NR (CH)

 29.3

 91.1

215
CH - Contract hauled
NR - Data not reported
                               529

-------
                                                 Table V-34"

                                   MAGNESIUM SURFACE TREATMENT SPENT BATHS
                                         RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
Ul
W
O
           Pollutant -

Toxic Pollutants

114.  antimony



115.  arsenic


117.  beryllium



118.  cadmium



119.  chromium (total)



120.  copper



121.  cyanide (total)



122.  1ead



123.  mercury



124.  nickel



125.  selenium
                                               Stream
                                                Code
Q-2
Q-5
Q-18

Q-5
Q-18

Q-2
Q-5
Q-18

Q-2
Q-5
Q-18

Q-2
Q-5
Q-18

Q-2
Q-5
Q-18

Q-2
Q-5
Q-18

Q-2
Q-5
Q-18

Q-2
Q-5
Q-18

Q-2
Q-5
Q-18

Q-2
Q-5
Q-18
                       Concentrations (mg/1)
                   Source    Day 1    Day 2
                                                                   <0.010
                                                                   <0.010
                                                                   <0.010

                                                                   <0.010
                                                                   <0.010

                                                                   <0.005
                                                                   <0.005
                                                                   <0.005

                                                                   <0.020
                                                                   <0.020
                                                                   <0.020
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 .
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.0002
<0.0002
<0.0002
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
    <0.100
     0.050
    <0.020

    <0.010
    <0.040

     0.010
   "  0.300
    <0.500

    <0.050
    <0.200
    <0.020

     0.350
     1 .80
83,600

    <0.100
    <0.500
   <50.0

     0.06
     0.24
     0.03

    <0.100
     0.500
   <50.0

     0.0002
    <0.0002
    <0.004

    <0.200
    <0.500
   <50.0

    <0.050
    <0.010
    <0.050

-------
                                          Table V-34 (Continued)

                                  MAGNESIUM SURFACE TREATMENT SPENT BATHS
                                        RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
Ul
(jO
H
           Pol 1utant

Toxic Pol 1utants (Continued)

126.  silver



127.  thallium



128.  zinc




Nonconven-tional  Pollutants

Acidi ty



A 1kali ni ty



Aluminum



Ammonia Nitrogen



Barium



Boron



Calcium
                                              Stream
                                               Code
                                               Q-2
                                               Q-5
                                               Q-18

                                               Q-2
                                               Q-5
                                               Q-18

                                               Q-2
                                               Q-5
                                               Q-18
                                               Q-2
                                               Q-5
                                               Q-18

                                               Q-2
                                               Q-5
                                               Q-18

                                               Q-2
                                               Q-5
                                               Q-18

                                               Q-2
                                               Q-5
                                               Q-18

                                               Q-2
                                               Q-5
                                               Q-18

                                               Q-2
                                               Q-5
                                               Q-18

                                               Q-2
                                               Q-5
                                               Q-18
     Concentrations (mg/1)
 Source    Day 1     Day 2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
-T : "
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.040
<0.040
<0 . 040
160
160
160

 <0.100
 <0.100
 <0.100

  0.4
  0.4
  0.4

 <0.050
 <0.050
 <0.050
    300
    300
  0.300

  3.70
  3.70
  3.70
                            <0.010
                            <0.010
                             0.020

                            <0.040
                            <0.020
                            <0.010

                             8.00
                           138
   180
15,000

27,000'
     6.00
    86.0
   100

     0.3
    58
    97

    <0.500
    <0.500
   <50.0

    16.0
     1 .00
  <100

    <1 .00
    27.0
   300

-------
                                         Table V-34 (Continued)

                                 MAGNESIUM SURFACE TREATMENT SPENT BATHS
                                       RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
U1
W
N)
           Pol Uitant

Nonconventional Pollutants  (Continued)

Chemical Oxygen Demand  (COD)



Chloride



Cobalt



Fluoride



Iron



Magnesium



Manganese
                                             Stream
                                              Code
                       Concentrations  (mg/1)
                   Sjjurce    Day  1     Dav  2
Q-2
Q-5
Q-18

Q-2
Q-5
Q-18

Q-2
Q-5
Q-18

Q-2
Q-5
Q-18

Q-2
Q-5
Q-18

Q-2
Q-5
Q-18

Q-2
Q-5
Q-18
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
500
500
500
7
7
7
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
0.3
0.3
0.3
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
0.900
0.900
0.900
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
                                                                                         2,500
                                                                                      >250,000
                                                                                             7
                                                                                           400
  <0.500
  <0.500
 <50.0

   1 .8
   1 .6
• 126

  <0.500
   3.50
 <50.0
                                                                                             I .00
                                                                                        12,700
                                                                                         5,600
                                                                                            <0.500
                                                                                             6.00
                                                                                           <50.0

-------
                                        Table V-34 (Continued)

                                MAGNESIUM SURFACE TREATMENT SPENT BATHS
                                      RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
                Pollutant

     Nonconventional  Pollutants (Continued)

     Molybdenum



     Phenoli cs



     Phosphate



     Sodium
                                            Stream
                                             Code
                       Concentrations (mg/1)
                   Source    Day 1    Day 2
Ul
U)
W   Sulfate
     Tin
     Ti tani urn
     Total  Dissolved Solids (TDS)
     Vanadium
     Yttrium
Q-2
Q-5
Q-18

Q-2
Q-5
Q-18

Q-2
Q-5
Q-18

Q-2
Q-5
Q-18

Q-2
Q-5
Q-18

Q-2
Q-5
Q-18

Q-2
Q-5
Q-18

Q-2
Q-5
Q-18

Q-2
Q-5
Q-18

Q-2
Q-5
Q-18
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
.f
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
74.6
74.6
74.6
480
480
480
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
260
260
260
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
     <0.500
     <0.500
    <50.0

     <0.005
     <0.01
     <0.01
  2, 100
     16
  ..  410

 35,700
 1 1 ,600
 10,800

 12,000
    210
  9,800
    <50.0
    <50.0
     <5.00

     <0.500
     <0.500
    <30.0
110,000
150,000
 95,000
     <0.500
     <0.500
    <50.0

     <0.500
     <0.500
    <50.0

-------
                                          Table V-34 (Continued)

                                  MAGNESIUM SURFACE TREATMENT SPENT BATHS
                                        RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
                  Pollutant
       Conventional  Pollutants

       Oi1  and Grease
       Total  Suspended  Solids  (TSS)
       pH  (standard  units)
Stream Sample
Code Type
Q-2 1
Q-5 1
Q-18 1
Q-2 1
Q-5 1
Q-18 1
Q-2 1
Q-5 1
Q-18 1
Concentrations
Source Day 1
31
31
31
7.90
7.90
7.90
(mg/1)
Day 2 Day 3
39
> 100, 000
140
270
70
12.60
3.80
0.80
(Jl
Ui
1.   No analyses were performed on the following toxic pollutants:  1-113, 116, and 129.

-------
                           ,Table V-35

                MAGNESIUM SURFACE TREATMENT RINSE
Water
Plant 1/kkg
1 3,340
3,340
2 NR
14,700
3 30,700
30,900
49,600
Use ;
gal/toni
800
800
NR
3,530
7,360
7,420
11,900
Percent
Recycle
0
0
P
*
0
0
*
Wastewater
1/kkg
3,340
3,340
1,510
12,600+
30,700
30,900
49,600
Discharge
gal/ton
800
800
363
3,030+
7,360
7,420
11,900
   - Periodic discharge    .                    .

   - This water use represents the sum of flows from non-cascaded
     sequential rinsing stages
NR - Data not reported   ;

 + - Loss due to evaporation and drag-out
                               535

-------
Ul
Ul
01
            Pollutant

Toxic  Pollutants

  11.   1,1,1-trichloroethane



  22.   p-ch]oro-m-cresol



 44.  methylene chloride



 57.  2-m" t rophenol



 65.  phenol



114.  antimony
                                              Table V-36

                                   MAGNESIUM SURFACE TREATMENT RINSE
                                      RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
                                            Stream
                                             Code
    115.  arsenic
 Q-6
 Q-7
 Q-11

 Q-6
 Q-7
 Q-11

 Q-6
 Q-7
 Q-11

 Q-6
 Q-7
 Q-11

 Q-6
 Q-7
 Q-11

 Q-3
 Q-4
 Q-6
 Q-7
 Q-8
 Q-9
 Q-10
 Q-11

 Q-3
 Q-4
 Q-6
 Q-7
Q-8
Q-9
Q-10
Q-11
 1
 1

 2
 4
 3

 1
 1
 1

 2
 4
 3

 2
 4
 3

 2
 4
 2
 4
 2
 4
 1
 3

 2
 4
 2
 4
 2
4
 1
3
Source Day 1
0.018
0.018
0.018 ND
0.011
0.011
0.011 ND
0.002
0.002
0.002 0.004
ND
ND
ND ND
ND
ND
ND 0.001
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010 <0.010
<0.010
<0 . 0 1 0
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010 <0.010
— >...„. . ,
Day 2
0.004
0.006

ND
ND

0.007
0.007

0.001
ND

ND
ND

<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010

<0.010
<0 . 0 10
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010

Day 3


0.008


ND


0.013


ND


ND
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010

<0.010

-------
                                       Table V-36 (Continued)

                                  MAGNESIUM SURFACE TREATMENT RINSE
                                     RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
               Pol 1utant

    Toxic Pollutants (Continued)

    117.  beryl 1ium
     118.  cadmi urn
W
     119.  chromium (total)
     120.  copper
                                           Stream
                                            Code
Q-3
Q-4
Q-6
Q-7
Q-8
Q-9
Q-10
Q-11
AC-2

Q-3
Q-4
Q-6
Q-7
Q-8
Q-9
Q-10
Q-11
AC-2
Q-3
Q-4
Q-6
Q-7
Q-8
Q-9
Q-10
Q-11
AC-2

Q-3
Q-4
Q-6
Q-7
Q-8
Q-9
Q-10
Q-11
AC-2
                      .Concentrations (mg/1)
2
4
2
4
2
4
1
3
2
4
2
4
2
4
1
3
2
4
2
4
2
4
1
3
Source
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.001
<0. 020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.005
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0,020
0.005
<0,050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
0.0055
Day 1 Day 2
<0.005
<0.005
0.005
<0.005
<0.050
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
0.001
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.200
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.005
<0.020
0.040
0.040
<0.020
.516
1 . 14
2.24
0.020
29.900
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.500
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
0.040
Day 3
<0.005

0.015

<0.050


<0.005

<0.020

<0.020

<0.200


<0.020

<0.020

0.060

496


0.020

<0.050

<0.050

<0.500


<0.050


-------
I
                                                    Table V-36  (Continued)

                                               MAGNESIUM SURFACE TREATMENT  RINSE
                                                  RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
                            Pollutant
                 Toxic Pollutants  (Continued)
                  121.  cyanide
                  122.   lead
             ui
             u>
             CO
                  123.  mercury
                  124.  nickel
Stream
 Code
 Q-3
 Q-4
 Q-6
 Q-7
 Q-8
 Q-9
 Q-10
 Q-11

 Q-3
 Q-4
 Q-6
 Q-7
 Q-8
 Q-9
 Q-10
 Q-11
 AC-2

 Q-3
 Q-4
 Q-6
 Q-7
 Q-8
 Q-9
 Q-10
 Q-11

 Q-3
 Q-4
 Q-6
 Q-7
 Q-8
 Q-9
 Q-10
 Q-11
 AC-2
Samp!e
 Type
  2
  4
  2
  4
  2
  4
  1
  3 .

  2
  4
  2
  4
  2
  4
  1
  3
                                                                                 Concentrations (mg/1)
Source
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050 '
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.0002
<0.0002
<0.0002
<0.0002.
<0.0002
<0.0002
<0.0002

-------
                                       Table V-36 (Continued)


                                  MAGNESIUM SURFACE TREATMENT RINSE
                                     RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
               Pollutant

    Toxic Pollutants (Continued)

    125.  selenium
    126.   silver
U1
OJ
vo
    127.   thallium
    128.   zinc
                                           Stream
                                            Code
                                                               Source
Concentrations (mg/1)
Q-3
Q-4
Q-6
Q-7
Q-8
Q-9
Q-10
Q-11
Q-3
Q-4
Q-6
Q-7
Q-8
Q-9
Q-10
Q-11
Q-3
Q-4
Q-6
Q-7
Q-8
Q-9
Q-10
Q-11
Q-3
Q-4
Q-6
Q-7
Q-8
Q-9
Q-10
Q-11
AC-2
2
4
2
4
2
4
1
3
2
4
2
4
2
4
1
3
2
4
2
4
2
4
1
3
2
4
2
4
2
4
1
3

<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
0.040
0.040
0.040
0.040
0.040
0.040
0.040
0.040
0.123
                                                                        <0.010
                                                                        <0.010
                                                                        <0.010
                                                                         0.320
                                                                         1 .860
<0.010
<0.010

-------
                                   Table V-36 (Continued)

                              MAGNESIUM SURFACE TREATMENT RINSE
                                 RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
           Pol lutant
Stream
 Code
    Concentrations (mg/1)
Source    Day 1    Day 2
Nonconvent ional Pollutants

Acidity
Al kal ini ty
A I umi num
Ammonia Nitrogen
Q-3
Q-4
Q-6
Q-7
Q-8
Q-9
Q-10
Q-11
Q-3
Q-4
Q-6
Q-7
Q-8
Q-9
Q-10
Q-11
Q-3
Q-4
Q-6
Q-7
Q-8
Q-9
Q-10
Q-11
AC-2
Q-3
Q-4
Q-6
Q-7
Q-8
Q-9
Q-10
Q-11
2
4
2
4
2
4
1
3
2
4
2
4
2
4
1
3
2
4
2
4
2
4
1
3

2
4
2
4
2
4
1
3
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
160
160
160
160
160
160
160
160
<0. 100
<0. 100
<0.100
<0. 100
<0. 100
<0. 100
<0. 100
<0. 100
0.129
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
                                                                   240
                                                                     0.400
                                                                     2.160
230
170
1 ,200
210
3
160
210

<0
<0
3
0
<1
<0
<0

0
0
26
0
1
0


2

.0



.100
.100
.90
.100
.00
. 100
. 100

.3
.5

.7
.5
. 1
340

,800

21


330
<0

10

<1


0
0

81

1









. 100

.9

.00


.700
.2



.8

                                                                              0. 1
                                                                     1 .2
                                                                                       0.8

-------
                                         Table V-36 (Continued)

                                    MAGNESIUM SURFACE TREATMENT  RINSE
                                       RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
                 Pollutant
                                             Stream
                                              Code
	Concentrations  (mg/1)
Source    Day 1     Day 2
      Nonconventional  Pollutants
      Bari um
U1
*^
H
      Boron
     Calci um
     Chemical Oxygen  Demand  (COD)
Q-3
Q-4
Q-6
Q-7
Q-8
Q-9
Q-10
Q-11
AC-2
Q-3
Q-4
Q~6
Q-7
Q-8
Q-9
Q-10
Q-11
AC-2
Q-3
Q-4
Q-6
Q-7
Q-8
Q-9
Q-10
Q-11
AC-2
Q-3
Q-4
Q-6
Q-7
Q-8
Q-9
Q-10
Q-11
2
4
2
4
2
4
1
3

2
4
2
4
2
4
1
3

2
4
2
4
2
4
1
3

2
4
2
4
2
4
1
3
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
<0
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
28
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
.050
.050
.050
.050
.050
.050
.050
.050
.020
.300
.300
.300
.300
.300
.300
.300
.300
.010
.70
.70
.70
.70
.70
.70
.20
.70
.20








<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0.050
0.024
0
0
0
0
<1
0
0
0.100
0.023
4
5
5
5
6
4
1
5.00
30.70
9
32
8,800
48
<10
9
53
180
.050
.050
.050
.050
.500
.050
.050


.200
. 100
.200
.200
.00
.200
.200


.70
.30
.70
.00
.00
.80
.30


.3

23


.3


<0.

<0.

<0.


<0.

0.

0.

<1 .


0.

4.

6.

6.


5.

10

,000

<10


780
050

050

500


050

200

200

00


100

60

00

00


00










-------
                                          Table V-36 (Continued)

                                     MAGNESIUM SURFACE TREATMENT RINSE
                                        RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
                  Pollutant
Stream
 Code
                                                                      Concentrations (ma/11
      Noncon\/ent1onal  Pollutants  (Continued)

      Chloride
      Cobalt
(Jl
*»
NJ
      Fluoride
      Iron
 Q-3
 Q-4
 Q-6
 Q-7
 Q-a
 Q-9
 Q-10
 Q-11

 Q-3
 Q-4
 Q-6
 Q-7
 Q-8
 Q-9
 Q-10
 Q-11
 AC-2

 Q-3
 Q-4
 Q-6
 Q-7
 Q-8
 Q-9
 Q-10
 Q-11
 AC-2

 Q-3
 Q-4
 Q-6
 Q-7
 Q-8
 Q-9
 Q-10
Q-11
AC-2
 2
 4
 2
 4
 2
 4
 1
 3

 2
 4
 2
 4
 2
4
 1
3
                                                         2
                                                         4
                                                         2
                                                         4
                                                         2
                                                         4
                                                         1
                                                         3
                                                         2
                                                         4
                                                         2
                                                         4
                                                         2
                                                         4
                                                         1
                                                         3
Source
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.004
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.99
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
0.302
Day 1 Day 2
<1
<1
<1
<]
<1

-------
                                        Table V-36  (Continued)

                                   MAGNESIUM SURFACE TREATMENT RINSE
                                      RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
                Pol 1utant
                                            Stream
                                             Code
                       Concentrations  (mg/1)
     Nonconventional Pollutants (Continued)
     Magnesium
Ul
LO
     "Manganese
     Mo 1ybdenum
     Phenoli cs
Q-3
Q-4
Q-6
Q-7
Q-8
Q-9
Q-10
p-11
AC-2
Q-3
Q-4
Q-6
Q-7
Q-8
Q-9
Q-10
Q-11
AC-2

Q-3
Q-4
Q-6
Q-7
Q-8
Q-9
Q-10
Q-'ll
AC-2
Q-3
Q-4
Q-6
Q-7
Q-8
Q-9
Q-10
Q-11
2
4
2
4
2
4
1
3
2
4
2
4
2
4
1
3
2
4
2
4
2
4
1
3

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Source
0.900
. 0.900
0.900
0.900
0.900
0.900
0.900
0.900
"6.880 "
< 0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
0.007
<0i050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.020
<0.005 *
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
Day 1 Day 2
4.00
5.30
431 1
10.5
57.0
1 .80
3.00
16.0
"49.8 	
<0.050
<0.050
0.150
<0.050
<0.500
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
0.093
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.500
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0..020
0.29
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005

Day 3
2.40

, 150

56.0


42.4

<0.050

0.350

<0.500


<0.050

<0.050

<0.050

<0.500


<0.050

<0.01

<0.01

0.010


<0.01

-------
                                        Table V-38 (Continued)

                                   MAGNESIUM SURFACE TREATMENT RINSE
                                      RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
                Pollutant

     Nonconventional  Pollutants (Continued)


     Phosphate
Stream
 Code
                                                                    Concentrations (mg/1)
LH   Sodium
     Sulfate
     Tin
Q-3
Q-4
Q-6
Q-7
Q-8
Q-9
Q-10
Q-11
2
4
2
4
2
4
1
3
<0.5
-<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
 Q-3
 Q-4
 Q-6
 Q-7
 Q-8
 Q-9
 Q-10
 Q-11
 AC-2

 Q-3
 Q-4
 Q-6
 Q-7
 Q-8
 Q-9
 Q-10
 Q-11

 Q-3
 Q-4
 Q-6
 Q-7
 Q-8
 Q-9
 Q-10
 Q-11
 AC-2
                                                        2
                                                        4
                                                        2
                                                        4
                                                        2
                                                        4
                                                        1
                                                        3
Source
<0.5
-<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
74.6
74.6
74.6
74.6
74.6
74.6
74.6
74.6
9.65
480
480
480
480
480
480
480
480 1
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
0.013
Day 1 Day 2
<0
<0
4
<0
8
<0
<0
<0.5
95
62
143
79
1 19
67
101
79.7
22.9
4,500
2,800
2,100
4,000
1,800
2,700
1 ,500
,900
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0.050
<0.013
.5
.5
.8
.5
.0
.5
.5

.0
.9

.8

.8



1

7

3


1
.050
.050
.050
.050
.500
.050
.050


Day 3
5

4.5

10


<0.5
145

284

119


81 .7

,300

,500

,000


,800
<0.050

<0.500

<0.500


<0.050


-------
                                       Table V-36 (Continued)

                                  MAGNESIUM SURFACE TREATMENT RINSE
                                     RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
               Pollutant
                                           Stream'
                                            Code
    Nonconventional Pollutants (Continued)
Sample
 Type
	Concentrations  (mg/1)
Source    Day 1     Day 2
    Titani um
Ul
>»
tn
    Total  Dissolved Solids (TDS)
    Total  Organic Carbon (TOC)
    Total  Solids (TS)
Q-3
Q-4
Q-6
Q-7
Q-8
Q-9
Q-10
Q-11
AC-2
Q-3
Q-4
Q-6
Q-7
Q-8
Q-9
Q-10
Q-11
Q-3
Q-4
Q-6
Q-7
Q-8
Q-9
Q-10
Q-11
Q-3
Q-4
Q-6.
Q-7
Q-8
Q-9
Q-10
Q-11
2
4
2
4
2
4
'1
3

2
4
2
4
2
4
1
3
2
4
2
4
2
4
1
3
2
4
2
4
2
4
1 -
3
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
- <0.
<"0.
<0.
0.
260
260
260
260
260
260
260
260
4.
4.
4.
4.
4.
4.
4.
4.
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
050
050
050
050
050
050
050
050
01.7








2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2








<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
•<0.
<0.
"<0 .
<0.050
0.022
290
230
3, 100
3.30
1 ,700
270
5
380

-------
                                        Table V-36 (Continued)

                                   MAGNESIUM SURFACE TREATMENT RINSE
                                      RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
                Pollutant
     Nonconventional Pollutants (Continued)
     Vanadium
     Yttrium
CJ1
     Conventional  Pollutants

     Oi1  and  Grease
    Total Suspended Solids (TSS)
Stream
 Code
 Q-3
 Q-4
 Q-6
 Q-7
 Q-8
 Q-9
 0-10
 Q-11
 AC-2

 Q-3
 Q-4
 Q-6
 Q-7
 Q-8
 Q-9
 Q-10
 Q-11
 AC-2
Q-3
Q-4
Q-6
Q-7
Q-8
Q-9
Q-10
Q-11

Q-3
Q-4
Q-6
Q-7
Q-8
Q-9
Q-10
Q-11
                                                        2
                                                        4
                                                        2
                                                        4
                                                        2
                                                        4
                                                        1
                                                        3
 2
 4
 2
 4
 2
 4
 1
 3
 1
 1
 1
 1
 1
 1
 1
 1

2
4
2
4
2
4
1
3
Source
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
31
31
31
31
31
31
31
.050
.050
.050
.050
.050
.050
.050
.050
.002
.050
.050
.050
.050
.050
.050
.050
.050
.010














Day 1 Day 2

-------
                                        Table V-36  (Continued)

                                   MAGNESIUM SURFACE TREATMENT  RINSE
                                      RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
                Pollutant

     Conventional Pol 1 utants (Continue_d)

     pH (standard units)
Stream
Code
Q-3
Q-4
Q-6
Q-7
Q-8
Q-9
Q-10
Q-11
-Samp 1 e
Type
2
4
2
4
2
4
.'..." 1 .
3
- Concentrations
Source Day 1
7.90
7.90
7.90
7.90
7.90
7.90
.7.90 ...... -
7.90 6.80
(mg/1)
Day 2
9.60
8.80
7.80
7.70
4.60
7.60
9.20.


Day 3
10.50

6.00

5.00


7.30
U1
     1.  ,,ThB following toxic pollutants were not detected-in 'this-waste stream:  ' 1-10, 12-21,
         23-43, 45-56, 58-64, and 66-88,     «

     2.   No analyses were performed on the f-ol lowing- toxic  pol lutants";, "89-1 13y 116, and: 129. !

-------
                           Table V-37

          MAGNESIUM SAWING OR GRINDING SPENT EMULSIONS
Plant

  1

  2
    Water Use
1/kkg     gal/ton
  169

   NR
40.5

NR
Percent     Wastewater Discharge
Recycle      1/kkg      gal/ton

 100 ( + )      00

   P         19.5 (CH)  4.68 (CH)
NR - Data not reported
 •f - Loss due to evaporation and drag-out
CH - Contract hauled
 P - Periodic discharge
                                548

-------
                           :Table V-38



          MAGNESIUM WET AIR POLLUTION CONTROL SLOWDOWN
Plant
1

2

Water
1/kkg
NR
NR
10,000
NR
Use
gal/ton
NR
NR
2,400
NR
Percent
Recycle
>90
>90
0
90
Wastewater
1/kkg
235
621
10,000
NR
Discharge
gal/ton
56.4
149
2,400
NR
NR - Data not reported
                               549

-------
                Table V-39

MAGNESIUM WET AIR POLLUTION CONTROL SLOWDOWN
        RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
Pol lutant
Toxic Pol lutants
117. beryllium
118. cadmium
119. chromium (total)
120. copper
122. lead
(j, 124. nickel
(J1
O 128. zinc
Nonconventional Pol 1 utants
Al umi num
Ammonia
Bari um
Boron
Ca 1 c i um
Cobalt
Floride
Iron
Magnesium
Manganese
Mo 1 ybdenum
Tin
Stream
Code

AC-1
AC-1
AC-1
AC-1
AC-1
AC-1
AC-1

AC-1
AC-1
AC-1
AC-1
AC-1
AC-1
AC-1
AC-1
AC-1
AC-1
AC-1
AC-1
Sample Concentrations (mg/1)
Type Source
<0.001
<0.005
0.005
0.0055

-------
                                             Table V-39 (Continued)

                                  MAGNESIUM WET AIR POLLUTION CONTROL SLOWDOWN
                                          RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
                   Pollutant
                                               Stream
                                                Code
    Concentrations (mg/1)
Source
        NonconventIonal  Pol 1utants (Continued)

        Titanium                                AC-1

        Vanadium                                AC-1

        Yttrium .. V .:.."...:.    .          AC-1..
 0.017     0.091

<0.002     0.088

<0.010     0.036
U1
U1
        No analyses were performed on the following toxic pollutants:
        1-116,  121, 123 and 125-127.

-------
                           Table V-40

              NICKEL-COBALT ROLLING SPENT NEAT OILS
 Plant

   1
   2
   4
   4
   3
   5

Average
    Water Use
L/kkg     gal/ton
  92.2
  NR
  85.1
  NR
  NR
  NR

  88.7
22.1
NR
20.4
NR
NR
NR

21.3
Percent
Recycle

100
100
100
100
  P
 NR
                     Wastewater Discharge
                      L/kkg     gal/tori
 0.00
 0.00
 0.00
 0.00
NR
NR

 0.00
 0.00
 0.00
 0.00
 0.00
NR
NR

 0.00
 P - Periodic discharge
NR - Data not reported
                              552

-------
                           Table V-41

              NICKEL-COBALT ROLLING SPENT EMULSIONS
              Water Use
Plant     L/kkg     gal/ton
2
3
3
1
1
4
5
23.17
59,730
100,100
NR
. • NR
NR
NR
5
14,320
24,000
NR
NR
NR
NR
                                 Percent
                                 Recycle

                                   0.0
                                   P
                                   P
                                   P
                                   P
                                  NR
                                  NR
                         Wastewater Discharge
                          L/kkg     gal/ton
Average  53,280
12,780 :
                                             23.17
                                             62.52
                                            425.5
                                             NR
                                             NR
                                             NR
                                             NR

                                            170.4
  5.56
 14.99
102.0
 NR
 NR
 NR
 NR

 40.85
 P - Periodic discharge
NR - Data not reported
                               553

-------
                                                   Table V-42

                                     NICKEL-COBALT ROLLING SPENT EMULSIONS
                                          RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
01
Ul
           Pollutant


Toxic Pollutants


 11.  1,1,1-trichloroethane



 23.  chloroform



 44.  methylene chloride



 55.  naphthalene



 64.  pentachlorophenol



 65.  phenol



 66.  bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate



 81.  phenanthrene



114.  antimony



115.  arsenic



117.  beryl 1i urn



118.  cadmium



119.  chromium (total)



120.  copper



121.  cyanide (total)
Stream
Code
D-4
F-5
D-4
F-5
D-4
F-5
D-4
F-5
D-4
F-5
D-4
F-5
D-4
F-5
D-4
F-5
D-4
F-5
D-4
F-5
D-4
F-5,
D-4
F-5
D-4
F-5
D-4
F-5
F-5
Sample
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
3
1
3
1
3
1
3
1
3
1
3
1
3
1
3
1
3
1
3
1
Concentrations (mg/l)
Source
0.009
0.014
0. 144
ND
0.002
. 0.002
ND
0.001
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.009
ND
ND
ND
<0.003
<0.002
<0.003
<0.005
<0.0005
<0.010
<0.002
<0.050
0.042
<0. 100
0.068
0. 170
<0. 02
Day 1
2.860
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.510
ND
ND
ND
2.470
0.607
0.468
ND
ND
ND
0.885
<0.003
0.008
<0.003
0.027
<0.005
<0.010
0.079
<0.050
1 . 1
3.80
1 .7
3.11
<0.02
Day 2
ND
ND
1 .670
0.977
2.570
0.351
ND
ND
0.003
• 0.007
<0.010
<0.050
2.81
2.70
<0.02
Day 3
ND
ND
0.810
0.649
1 .530
0.339
ND
ND
<0.002
0.017
<0.010
<0.050
5.20
4.20
<0.02

-------
                                    Table V-42  (Continued)

                            NICKEL-COBALT ROLLING  SPENT  EMULSIONS
                                 RAW WASTEWATER  SAMPLING DATA
           Pol 1utant
Toxic
122.
123.
124.
125.;
5 126.
(Jl
127.
128.
Pollutants (Continue
lead
mercury
ni eke 1
se 1 sni urn - . -
si 1 ver
thai 1 ium
zi nc
Nonconvent ional Pollutants
Acidity


Alkali ni ty


Alumi num


Ammonia Nitrogen


Barium


Boron


Calcium
Stream
Code
D-4
F-5
D-4
F-5
D-4
F-5
D-4
•• F-5 - --
D-4
F-5
D-4
F-5
D-4
F-5
D-4
F-5
D-4
F-5
D-4
F-5
D-4
F-5
D-4
F-5
D-4
F-5
D-4
F-5
Sampl e
1
'3
1
3
1
3
1
	 -3- "
1
3
1
3
1
3
1
3
1
3
1
. 3
1
3
1
3
1
3
1
3
Concentrations (mg/1)
Source
<0.084
<0. 100
<0.0002
<0.0020
<0.003
0.200
<0.003
- - <0.010 .
<0.001
<0.002
<0.003
<0.005
0.038
<0.050
<1
<1
180
61
<0.050
0.910
<1
0.04
0. 12
0.080
<0.009
<0 . 1 00
63
46.2
Day 1 Day. 2
0.75
3.44 3.05
<0
<0
4
28
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
5
5
<1
<1
420
260
0
1
<1
6
0
0
0
<0
38
11
.0002 •
.0020 <0.0020
.7
.0 20.6
.003
.010. . ...<0;0-1Q ;-
.001
.002 0.011
.003
.005 <0.005
. 1
.58 4.82
<1
250
,51
.13 1 ; 12
.0 2.6
.24
.110 0. 150
.28
.100 0.230
.3 10.9
Day 3
5.28
<0.0020
34.2

-------
                                           Table V-42 (Continued)


                                   NICKEL-COBALT ROLLING SPENT EMULSIONS
                                        RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
tn
ui
           Pollutant


Nonconventional  Pollutants (Continued)



Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD)



Chloride



Cobalt



Fluoride



Iron



Magnesi um



Manganese



Molybdenum



Phenolics


Phosphate



Sodium



Sulfate



Tin



Ti tanium
Stream
Code
D-4
F-5
D-4
F-5
D-4
F-5
D-4
F-5
D-4
F-5
D-4
F-5
D-4
F-5
D-4
F-5
F-5
D-4
F-5
D-4
F-5
D-4
F-5
D-4
F-5
D-4
F-5
1-
Sample
1
3
1
3
1
3
1
3
1
3
1
3
1
3
1
3
1
1
3
1
3
1
3
1
3
1
3

Concentrations (mg/1)
Source
<5 21
<1 86
34
"12
<0
<0
0
0
0
1
24
12
0
0
0
<0
<0
<4
<4
9
154
53
130
<0
<0
<0
<0


.006
.100
.45
.43
.066
.37
.7
.012
.080
.030
.200
.005

.5

.12
.200
.005
.020

Day 1
,100
,000 76,
340
35
0
<0
10
3
18
74
66
5
3
0
1
<0
0
30
150
28
14
380
550
<0
<0
0
0


.41
. 100
.2
.9
.4
.33
. 1
.580
. 1
.200
.99

.5

. 12
.200
.85
. 150
I :'
Day 2 Day 3
V
000 26,000
34 38
<0.100 <0.100
2.2 1.9
58.0 88.0
5.05 9.52
0.490 0.720
0.400 1.07
1.13 0.12
250 230
12.0 20.2
220 330
<0.200 <0.200
0.080 0.170


-------
                                          Table  V-42  (Continued)
                                  NICKEL-COBALT  ROLLING  SPENT  EMULSIONS
                                       RAW WASTEWATER  SAMPLING DATA
Ul
in
                 Pollutant
      Nonconventional  Pollutants  (Continued)
      Total  Dissolved  Solids  (TDS)
      Total  Organic  Carbon (TOO
      Total  Solids  (TS)
      Vanadium
      Yttrium
      Conventional  Pollutants
      Oi1  and  Grease
      Total  Suspended Solids  (TSS)
      pH  (standard  units)
Stream
Code
D-4
F-5
D-4
F-5
D-4
F-5
D-4 .
F-5
D-4
F-5
D-4
F-5
D-4
F-5
D-4
F-5
Sample
1 '
3
1
3
1
3-
1
3
1
3
1
1
1
3
1
3
Concentrations (mg/ 1 )
Source Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
393 6,000
320 4,400 5,300 5,900
8
2
395
330
0
<0
<0
<0
<1
<1
<1
22
7
6
10,300
15,000 11,000
22,000
30,000 60,000
.016 0.038
.010 <0.010 <0.
.002 <0.002
.020 <0.020 <0.
800
1,220 2,600
960
6,800 5,500
.14 6.17
.64 5.63 6 .
13,000
30,000
,010 <0.010
.020 <0.020
7,600
6,220
.08 6.25
      1.   The  following  toxic.pol1utants  were  not  detected  in  this  waste  stream:   1-10,  12-22,
          24-43,  45-54,  56-63,  67-80,  and 82-88.
      2.   No  analyses  were  performed on  the  following  toxic  pollutants:   89-113,  116,  and 129.

-------
                           Table V-43

           NICKEL-COBALT ROLLING CONTACT COOLING WATER
 Plant

   1
   1
   2
   3
   4
   5
   2
   4
   6
      Water Use
  L/kkg     gal/ton
    NR
    NR
    72.76
   434.6
43,370
 3,470
 4,074
 4,583
    NR
Average   9,334
    NR
    NR
    17.45
   104.2
10,400
   832.2
   976.9
 1,099
    NR

 2,238
Percent
Recycle

100
100
  0.0
  0.0
 98.8
  0.0
  0.0
  0.0
  P
                         Wastewater Discharge
                          L/kkg     gal/ton
    0.00
    0.00
   72.76
  434.6
  536.8
3,470
4,074
4,583
   NR

2,195
    0.00
    0.00
   17.45
  104.2
  128.7
  832.2
  976.9
1,099
   NR

  526.4
 P - Periodic discharge
NR - Data not reported
                                558

-------
                                                Table V-44

                               NICKEL-COBALT ROLLING CONTACT COOLING WATER
                                       RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
                 Pol 1utant
U1
en
vo
      Toxic Pollutants
       11.   1 ,1 , 1-trichloroethane
       13.   1 , 1-dichloroethane
       22.   p-ch1oro-m-cresol
23.   chloroform
       29.   1 , 1-dichloroethy1ene
       34.   2,4-dimethylphenol
       44.   methylene chloride
       55.   naphthalene
       65.   phenol
                                             Stream
                                              Code
0-2
D-3
F-3
F-4

D-2
D-3
F-3
F-4

D-2
D-3
F-3
F-4

D-2
D-3
F-3
F-4

D-2
D-3
F-3
F-4

D-2
D-3
F-3
F-4

D-2
D-3
F-3
F-4

D-2
D-3
F-3
F-4

D-2
D-3
F-3
F-4
                                                Sample
                                                 Type
                       Concentrations  (mg/1)
Source
0.009
0.009
0.014
0.014
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0. 144
0. 144
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.002
ND
ND
0.001
0.001
ND
ND
ND
ND
Day 1

0.016
0. 135
0.015

N'D
0.006
.. ND .

ND
ND
ND

ND
ND
ND

ND
0.005
ND

ND
ND
ND

0.002
0.005
0.003

ND
ND
ND

ND
0.039
0.220
Day 2
0.008

0.246
ND
ND

0.023
ND
ND .

0.046
ND
ND

ND
ND
ND

0.013
ND
ND

0.038
ND
ND

0.002
0.171
ND

ND
0. 123
ND

ND
0.379
Day 3


0.087
ND


NU
ND


ND
ND


ND
ND


ND
ND


ND
ND


0.017
0.015


ND
0.007


0.012
0.054

-------
                                            Table V-44  (Continued)

                                 NICKEL-COBALT ROLLING CONTACT COOLING WATER
                                         RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
(Jl
O>
O
           Pollutant

Toxic Pollutants (Continued)

 66.  bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate




 67.  butyl benzyl phthalate




 68.  di-n-butyl phthal.ate




114.  ant imony




115.  arseni c




117.  bery11i urn




118.  cadmium




119.  chromium (total)




120.  copper
                                               Stream
                                                Code
D-2
D-3
F-3
F-4

D-2
D-3
F-3
F-4

D-2
D-3
F-3
F-4

D-2
D-3
F-3
F-4

D-2
D-3
F-3
F-4

D-2
D-3
F-3
F-4

D-2
D-3
F-3
F-4

D-2
D-3
F-3
F-4

D-2
D-3
F-3
F-4
         Sample
          Type
                                                                Concentrations  (mg/1)
Source
0.009
0.009
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
<0.003
<0.003
<0.002
<0.002
<0.003
<0.003
<0.005
<0.005
<0.0005
<0.0005
<0.010
<0.010
<0.002
<0.002
<0.050
<0.050.
0.042
0.042
<0.100
<0 . 1 00
0.068
0.068
0. 170
0. 170
Day 1

0.016
ND
ND

ND
ND
ND

ND
ND
ND

<0.003
0.002
<0.002

<0.003
<0.005
0.018

0.001
<0.010
<0.010

0.13
<0.050
<0.050

0.52
<0. 100-
<0. 100

0.78
0.350
0.240
Day 2
NO

ND
ND
ND

ND
ND
ND

ND
ND
<0.003

<0.002
<0.002
<0.003

<0.005
<0.005
<0.005

<0.010
<0.010
0.084

<0.050
<0 . 050
1 .8

<0. 100
<0. 100
0.083

0.260
0.320
Day 3


0.002
0.003


ND
0.002


0.001
ND


<0.002
<0.002


<0 . 0.05
<0.005


<0.010
•:O.U10


<0.050
<0.050


<0. 100
<0. 100


0. 140
0. 160

-------
                                             Table V-44  (Continued)

                                 'NICKEL-COBALT ROLLING CONTACT COOLING WATER
                                          RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
Ul
O\
H
                   'Pollutant
        Toxic  Pol 1utants  (Continued)
         121.   cyanide  (total)
         122.   lead
         123.  mercury
         124.  nickel
         125.  se1eni urn
        126.  si 1ver
        127.  thai 1ium
        128.  zinc
Stream
 Code ..
 F-3
 F-4

 D-2
 D-3
 F-3
 F-4

-D-2
 D-3
 F-3
 F-4

 D-2
 D-3
 F-3
 F-4

 D-2
 D-3
 F-3
 F-4

 D-2
 D-3
 F-3
 F-4

 D-2
 D-3
 F-3
 F-4

 D-2
 D-3
 F-3
 F-4
 Sample
-- Type
   1
   1

   1
   1
   3
   3

   1
   1
   3
   3

   1
   1
   3
   3

   1
   1
   3
   3

   1
   1
   3
   3

   1
   1
   3
   3

   1
   1
   3
   3
                                                                        Concentrations '(mg/1)
Source

<0.

-------
                                              Table V-44  (Continued)

                                   NICKEL-COBALT ROLLING CONTACT COOLING WATER
                                           RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
                     Pol lutant

         Nonconventional  Pollutants
Stream
 Code
                    Source
                                                                         Concentrations (mg/1)
U1
0\
NJ
         Acidity
         Alkalinity
         Aluminum
         Ammonia Nitrogen
         Barium
         Boron
         Calcium
         Chemical  Oxygen  Demand (COD)
D-2
D-3
F-3
F-4
D-2-
D-3
F-3
F-4
D-2
D-3
F-3
F-4
D-2
D-3
F-3
F-4
D-2
D-3
F-3
F-4
D-2
D-3
F-3
F-4
D-2
D-3
F-3
F-4
D-2
D-3
F-3
F-4
1
1
3
3
1
1
3
3
1
1
3
3
1
1
3
3
1
1
3
3
1
1
3
3
1
1
3
3
1
1
3
3
<1
<1
<1
<1
180
180
61
61
<0.050
<0
0
0
<1
<1
0
0
0
0
0
0
<0
<0
<0
<0
63
63
46
46
<5
<5
<1
<1
.050
.910
.910


.04
.04
. 12
.12
.080
.080
.009
.009
.100
.100


.2
.2




<1
<1
<1
110
62
42
1 .
0.
0.

<1
0.
0.

0.
0.
0.

0.
<6.
<0.

47
32.
30.

540
310
210
<1
<1
<1
1 10
63
48
0-4R
1
290
too


30
23

0035
060
040

24
100
100


5
8





0
0
0

0
0
o

0
0
0

0
0
1 10

36
33
6 1

190
350-

.720
.420
. 17

.34
. 18
. 15

.080
.060
.059

.390
.260


.7
.0




<1
<1
46
46

0
0


<0
0


0
0


.0
0


30,
29.


33'
220


.390
.220


.01
.09


.050
.040


. 130
.230


, 2
.7





-------
                                           Table V-44   (Continued)

                                NICKEL-COBALT ROLLING CONTACT COOLING  WATER
                                        RAW WASTEWATER  SAMPLING  DATA
Ul
CT>
CjJ
                  Pollutant

       Nonconventional Pollutants  (Continued)


       Chloride
       Cobalt
        Fluoride
        I ron
        Magnesi urn
        Manganese
        Mo 1ybdenum
        Phenolics
        Phosphate
                                              Stream
                                               Code
 D-2
•D-3
 F-3
 F-4

 D-2
 D-3
 F-3
 F-4

 D-2
 D-3
 F-3
 F-4

 D-2
 D-3
 F-3
 F-4"

 D-2
 D-3
 F-3
 F-4

 D-2
 D-3
 F-3
 F-4

 D-2
 D-3
 F-3
 F-4

 F-3
 F-4

 D-2
 D-3-
 F-3
 F-4
                                                                       Concentrations (mg/1)
1
1
3
3

1
1
3
3

1
1
3
3

1
1
3
3

1
1
3
3

1
 1
3
3

 1
 1
 3
 3

 1
 1

 1
 1
 3
 3
Source
34
34
12
12
<0.006
<0.006
<0. 100
<0.100
0.45~
0.45
0.43
0.43
0.066
0.066
1 .37
1 .37
24
24
12.7
12.7
0.012
0.012
0.080
0.080
0.030
0.030
<0.200
<0.200
<0.005
<0.005
<4
<4
<4
<4
Day 1
81
27
28
0.29
<0. 100
<0. 100
1 .4 .
1 . 1
1.1

3.8
0.990
0.580

32
10.8
10.6

0.31
0.080
0. 120

18
<0.200
<0.200
0.095
0.29

100
13
12
Day 2
64
28
34 1 ,
0.68

-<0. 100
<0.100
- 2-;T - -
4.4
1.7
3. 1

0.820
0.610
35

1 1 .8
10.8
0. 10

0. 160
0.070
1 .8

<0.200
<0.200
0.36
<0.005
<4

<4
<4
Day 3
31
210

<0 . 100
<0. 100

1.2
1.2-


1 .43
0 . 290


10.2
10..1


0.050
0.070


<0.200
0.380
0.017
6.0


<4
<4

-------
                                           Table V-44  (Continued)
                                NICKEL-COBALT ROLLING CONTACT COOLING WATER
                                        RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
                  Pollutant
Stream
 Code
                                                                      Concentrations (mg/1)
Ul
       Nonconventiona1 Pollutants (Continued)

       Sodium
       Sulfate
       Tin
       Ti tanium
       Total Dissolved Solids (TDS)
       Total Organic Carbon (TOC)
       Total Solids (TS)
       Vanadium
       Yttrium
 D-2
 D-3
 F-3
 F-4

 D-2
 D-3
 F-3
 F-4

 D-2
 D-3
 F-3
 F-4

 D-2
 D-3
 F-3
 F-4

 D-2
 D-3
 F-3
 F-4

 D-2
 D-3
 F-3
 F-4

 D-2
 D-3
 F-3
 F-4

 D-2
 D-3
 F-3
 F-4

 D-2
 D-3
 F-3
 F-4
Source
9.5
9
154
154
53
53
130
130
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
393
393
320
320
8
8
2
2
395
395
330
330
0
0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
.5






.12
.12
.200
.200
.005
.005
.020
.020









1


.016
.016
.010
.010
.002
.002
.020
.020
Day 1
23
26
26

93
160
150

1
<0
<0

0
_<0
<0

580
260
280

200
45
.31

,070
360
370

0
<0
<0

<0
<0
<0

.8
.8





. 1
.200
.200

.15
.020
.020













.057
.010
.010

.002
.020
.020
Day 2
26

13
27
240

100
98
<0

<0
<0
1

0
<0
560

380
290
79

38
120
620

400
380
0

<0
<0
<0

<0
<0

.9
.8



.*-
. 12

.200
.200
. 1

.020
.020












.050

.010
.010
.002

.020
.020
Day 3

13
27


97
no


<0
<0


<0
<0


270
270


4
60


360
360


<0
<0


<0
<0

.4
.4






.200
.200


.020
.020














.010
.010


.020
.020

-------
                                          Table V-44   (Continued)

                               NICKEL-COBALT ROLLING CONTACT COOLING WATER
                                       RAW WASTEWATER  SAMPLING DATA
Ul
O\
Ul
                 Pollutant
      Conventional Pollutants
      Oi 1 and Grease
      Total Suspended Solids (TSS)
      pH (standard units)
Stream
Code
D-2
D-3
- F-3 - -
F-4
D-2
D-3 :
F-3
F-4
D-2
D-3
F-3
F-4
Sampl e
Type
1
1
" .--.1 . "
1
1
1
3
3
1
1
3
3
Corirentrat i ons
Source

<1
	 <1 _
<\
<1
<1
22
22
7.14
7.14
6.64
6.64
Day 1

300
1 15-
"190-

350
35
50

! 6.22
7 . 73
6.29
(mg/1)
Day 2
38

99
84 	
74

25
90
6.41

6.14
5,84

Day 3


3?:
-so1 - --

.
30
42


6.37
6.14
      1.  The following toxic pollutants were not detected in this waste stream:  1-10,  12,  14-21,
          24-28, 30-33, 35-43, 45-54, 56-64, and 69-88.

      2.  No analyses were performed on the following toxic pollutants:  89-113, 116, and  129.

-------
                           Table V-45
          NICKEL-COBALT TUBE REDUCING SPENT LUBRICANTS
Plant
1*
2
3
Water
L/kkg
16.04
292.0
NR
Use**
gal/ton
3.85
70.00
NR
Percent
Recycle
P
P
NR
Wastewater
L/kkg
16.04
292.0
NR
Discharge
gal/ton
3.85
70.00
NR
Average
154.0
36.93
154.0
36.93
 P - Periodic discharge
NR - Data not reported
 *Nickel forming no longer performed at this plant,
**Waste lubricant per mass of nickel tube reduced.
                               566

-------

                 Table V-46

NICKEL-COBALT TUBE REDUCING SPENT LUBRICANTS
        RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
Toxic
1 1 .
44.
55.
62.
1 14.
115.
.. ~_. — __.„,_ .
117.
Ul
O\ 118.
1 19.
. 120.
121 .
122.
123.
124.
125..
126.
127.
128..
Pol lutant
Pol 1 utants
1 , 1 , 1-trichloroethane
methylene chloride
naphthal ene
N-nitrosodiphenylamine
ant i irony
arseni c
beryl 1 i urn
cadmium
chromium (total)
copper
cyanide (total )
.lead
mercury
nickel
selenium
si 1 ver
thai 1 ium
zinc
Stream Sample
Code Type
F-18 1
F-18 1
F-18 1
F-18 1
F-18 1
F-18 • 1
-- - 	 	 _._.... _C 	 1 Q ... - _, .. ._ _. 1 . _
~r i o i —
F-18 1
F-18 ^ 1
F-18 :: ., 1
F-18 ' - 1
F-18 1
.F-18 1
F-18 . 1
F-18 ., 1
F-18 :' 1
F-18 1
F-18 : 1
Concentrations (mg/1)
Source Day 1
0.014
0.002
0.001
ND
<0.002
<0.005
<0.050

-------
                                            Table V-46  (Continued)

                                 NICKEL-COBALT TUBE REDUCING SPENT LUBRICANTS
                                         RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
Ul
O\
00
           Pollutant

Nonconventional  Pollutants (Continued)



Boron

Calcium

Cobalt

Iron

Magnesium

Manganese

Mo 1ybdenum

Phenolics

Phosphate

Sodium

Sulfate

Tin

Titanium  '  •

Total Dissolved Solids (TDS)

Total Solids  (TS) -

Vanadi urn

Yttrium

Conventional  Pollutants

Oi1 and Grease

Total Suspended Sol ids .(TSS)

pH (standard  units)
Stream
Code
F-18
F-18
F-18
F-18
F-18
F-18
F-18
F-18
F-18
F-18
F-18
F-18
F-18
F-18
F-18
F-18
F-18
F-18
F-18
F-18
Sample
Concentrations
Type Source Day 1
1 <0.100
1 46.
1 <0.
1 1 .
1 12.
1 0.
1 <0.
1 <0.
1 - <4
1 154
1 130
1. <0.
1 <0.
1 320
1 330
1 <0.
1 <0.
1 <1
1 22
1 6.
2
100
37
7
080
200
005



200
020


010
020


64
(mg/1)
Day 2 Day 3
17.2
7,010
<0. 100
21 .4
379
4.01
0.620
<0.005
<4
. 1,260
340
<0.200
<0.020
360,000
370,000
<0.010
<0.020
200.000
<1
6.10

-------
Ul
o\
vo
                                          Table V-46  (Continued)


                               .NICKEL-COBALT TUBE REDUCING SPENT LUBRICANTS

                                       RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA




      1.   The following toxic pollutants were not detected in this waste stream:  1-10, 12-43,

       . .   45-54-,  56-61, and 63-88..


      2.   No analyses .were performed on the following toxic pollutants:  89-113, 116, and  129.

-------
                           Table V-47

              NICKEL-COBALT DRAWING SPENT NEAT OILS
 Plant

   1
   4
   4
   5*
   5*
   5*
   2
   3
   6
   7
   8

Average
    Water Use
L/kkg     gal/ton
  NR
  36.0
 158
   1.16
   2.32
   2.32
  NR
  20.6
  NR
  NR
  NR

  36.73
NR
 8.64
38.0
 0.28
 0.56
 0.56
NR
 4.95
NR
NR
NR

 8.83
Percent
Recycle

100
100
100
  0.0
  0.0
  0.0
  P
  P
 NR
 NR
 NR
                     Wastewater Discharge
                      L/kkg     gal/ton
 0.00
 0.00
 0.00
 1.16
 2.32
 2.32
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR

 1.93
 0.00
 0.00
 0.00
 0.28
 0.56
 0.56
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR

 0.46
 P - Periodic discharge
NR - Data not reported

*Nickel forming no longer performed.at this plant.
                               570

-------
                          : Table V-48

              NICKEL-COBALT DRAWING SPENT EMULSIONS
 Plant

   1
   2
   3
   4
   5
   6
   7
   7
   8

Average
    Water Use* ;
L/kkg     gal/ton
  NR
  NR
  NR
  NR
  NR
  NR
 135
 135
  16.9

  95.4
NR,
NR1
NR!

NR
NR!
32;. 3
32.3
 4.05
 " i
22.9
Percent
Recycle

  P
  P
  P
  P
  P
  P
  P
  P
  P
                     Wastewater Discharge
                      L/kkg     gal/ton
 NR
 NR
 NR
 NR
 NR
 NR
135
135
 16.9

 95.4
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
32.3
32,3
 4.05

22.9
 P - Periodic discharge  '
NR - Data not reported   ;

*Waste emulsion per mass of nickel drawn.
                                571

-------
              Table V-49

NICKEL-COBALT DRAWING SPENT EMULSIONS
     RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA






Ul
*0
to




Pol 1 utant
Toxic Pol lutants
117. beryllium
118. cadmium
119. chromium (total)
120. copper
122. lead
124. nickel
128. zinc
Nonconventional Pollutants
Cobalt
Fluoride
Iron
Stream Sample

AS-1 i
AS-1 1
AS-1 i
AS-1 1
AS-1 1
AS-1 1
AS-1 1

AS-1 1
AS-1 1
AS-1 l
Concentrations (mq/1)
Source Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
<0.02
<0.05
<0.05
50.0
<0.05
3.0
2.6

<0.05
<6.
17.0

-------
                                           Table V-49 (Continued)
                                   NICKEL-COBALT DRAWING SPENT EMULSIONS
                                        RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
                                              Stream
                                               Code
                  Pollutant

       Nonconventional  Pol 1utants (Continued)

       Molybdenum                             AS-1

       Titanium                               AS-1
          Sample    	Concentrations (mg/1)	
           Type     Source    Day 1    Day 2    Day 3



            1          -     <0.03

            1          -     <0.06
       Conventional Pol 1utants

       Oi1  and Grease

       Total Suspended Solids (TSS)
AS-1

AS-1
-  2,490.0

-  1,300.0
en
•vj
w
       1.  No analyses were performed on the following toxic pollutants:
       1-116, 121, 123 and 125-127.

-------
                           Table V-50

            NICKEL-COBALT EXTRUSION SPENT LUBRICANTS
 Plant

   1
   2
   3
   4

Average
    Water Use
L/kkg     gal/ton
 NR
 NR
 NR
127

127
NR
NR
NR
30.5

30.5
Percent
Recycle

100
100
100
100
                                             Wastewater Discharge
                                              L/kkg     gal/ton
                                               0.00
                                               0.00
                                               0.00
                                               0.00

                                               0.00
                                               0.00
                                               Q.OO
                                               d.oo
                                               0.00

                                               0.00
NR - Data not reported
                               574

-------
                           Table V-51

    NICKEL-COBALT EXTRUSION PRESS AND SOLUTION HEAT TREATMENT
                      CONTACT COOLING WATER
 Plant

   1
   2

Average
    Water Use*   |
L/kkg     gal/ton. I
  46.3
 120

  83.2
11.l!
28.9 ;

20. 0.'
Percent
Recycle

  0.0
  P
                     Wastewater Discharge
                      L/kkg     gal/ton
 46.3
120

 83.2
11.1
28.9

20.0
P - Periodic discharge

*Wastewater generated per mass of nickel-cobalt
                               575

-------
                                   Table V-52

NICKEL-COBALT EXTRUSION PRESS AND SOLUTION HEAT TREATMENT  CONTACT  COOLING V/ATER
                          RAV/ WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
Toxic
5.
11 .
23.
28.
36.
37.
43.
55.
Ul
* 6K
63.
66.
67.
69.
70.
1 14.
115.
117.
1 18.
1 19.
izg.
1 O 1
122.
Pol lutant .
Pol lutants
benzidine
1 , 1 , 1 -t rich 1 o roe thane
chl orof orm
3 ,3'-dichl orobenzidine
2, 6-dini trotoluene
1 , 2-dipheny Ihydrazine
bis(2-choroethoxy) me thane
naphthalene
N-ni trosodimethy 1 ami ne
N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine
bis(2-ethy Ihexy 1 ) phthalate
butyl benzyl phthalate
di-n-o.ctyl phthalate
diethyl phthalate
antimony
arseni c
beryl Hum ...
cadmi urn
chromium (total)
copper
cyanide ( total )
lead
Stream
Code

E-3
E-3
E-3
E-3
E-3
E-3
E-3
E-3
E-3
E-3
E-3
E-3
E-3
E-3
E-3
E-3 '
E-3
E-3
E-3
E-3
E-3-'
E-3
Sample
1
1
1
1
1
i
i
i
1
1
i
i
1
i
i
i
i
1
i
i
i
i
Concentrations (mg/ll
Source
0.762
0.005
0.015
0.001
O.OO2
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.024
0.001
0.001
ND
**
<0.005
<0.005
<0.010
<0.050
<0. 100
0.080
<0.02
<0. 100
pay 1 Day 2 Day 3
t*
ND
ND
ND
0.002
ND
ND
ND
**
0.022
0.001
ND
0.004
ND
<0.005
<0.005
<0.010
<0.050
0. 130
0.050
<0.02
<0. 100

-------
NICKEL-COBALT EXTRUSION
     Table V-52  (Continued)

PRESS AND SOLUTION HEAT TREATMENT CONTACT COOLING WATER
  RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
Pol 1 utant
Toxic Pollutants (Continued)

123. mercury
1 24. nickel "

125. selenium

1 26 . si 1 ver

127. thallium

.128. zinc
Nonconvent ional Pollutants

Acidity

Al kal ini ty

A 1 umi num
Ammonia Nitrogen

Bari urn

Boron
* •
Cal ciurn
Chemical Oxygen Demand

Chloride

'Cobalt

Fl uoride


I ron

Magnesium

Manganese

Molybdenum
Stream Sample
Code Type

E-3 1

"E-S 1
E-3 1

E-3 1

E-3 1

E-3 1


E-3 ,1

E-3 ' 1

E-3 ; 1 '

E-3 . 1
E-3 1

E-3 1

E-3 1

E-3 '...' ' 1
E-3 1

E-3 1

E-3 1


E-3 1

E-3 ' 1

E-3 1

E-3 1

Concentrations (mg/1)
Source Pay

<0.0010

<0. 100
<0.010

<0.002

<0.002

<0.050


<1

83

' 0.300 :

0.22
0.060

0. 170

33.0

34
26 ;

<0.100~

0.44


1.0

15.8

0.140

<0.200

1 Day 2 Day a

<0.0010

• - CT_ ! 40 -
<0.010

<0.002

<0.002

0.070


<1

55

0.080

0-..13 . - - -
0.050

' 0.600

..24.4

33 ;
.15

' ' <0. 100

0.83

On
. *T

10.2

0.014

<0.200


-------
                                    Table V-52  (Continued)

       NICKEL-COBALT EXTRUSION PRESS AND SOLUTION HEAT TREATMENT CONTACT COOLING WATER
                                 RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
Pol lutant
Nonconventional Pollutants (Continued)
Phenolics
Phosphate
Sodium
Sulfate
Tin
in Titanium
^i
^j
00 Total Dissolved Solids (TDS)
Total Organic Carbon (TOC)
Total Solids (TS)
Vanadium
Yttrium
Conventional Pollutants
Oi 1 and Grease
Total Suspended Solids (TSS)
pH (standard units)
Stream
Code

E-3
E-3
E-3
E-3
E-3
E-3
E-3 "
E-3
E-3
E-3
E-3

E-3
E-3
E-3
Sample Concentrations (mg/1)
Type Source

1 0.014
1 16
1 33.0
1 170
1 <0.200
1 <0.020
1 330
1 <1
1 380
1 <0 . 0 1 0
1 <0.020

1 <1
1 29
1 6.71
Day 1 Day 2 Day 3

0.021
12
26.6
150
<0.200
<0.020
170
<1
230
<0.010
<0.020

7
3.0
7.39
1.  The following toxic pollutants were not detected in this waste stream: - 1-4, 6-10,
    12-22,  24-27, 29-35,  38-42,  44-54, 56-60, 62, 64, 65, 68, and 71-88.

2.  No analyses were performed on the fo11 owing toxic pollutants:  89-113, 116,  and 129.

-------
                           Table V-53

      NICKEL-COBALT EXTRUSION PRESS HYDRAULIC FLUID LEAKAGE
 Plant

   1

Average
    Water Use
L/kkg     gal/ton
  NR
  NR
NR,
NR:
Percent
Recycle

 NR
                     Wastewater Discharge
                      L/kkg     gal/ton
231.9

231.9
55.60

55.60
NR - Data not reported
                               579

-------
                      Table V-54

NICKEL-COBALT EXTRUSION PRESS HYDRAULIC FLUID LEAKAGE
             RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
Toxi c
5.
1 1 .
12.
13.
22.
23.
Ul
§ 28.
34.
36.
37.
: - 39.
43.
44.
55.
61 .
63.
65.
66.
67.
70.
71 .
72.
Pol lutant
Pol lutants
benzidine
1,1, 1-trichloroethane
hexachloro ethane
1,1-dichloroethane
p-chl oro-m-cresol
ch 1 oroform
3 ,3-'-dichl orobenzidine .
2 ,4-di methyl phenol
2,6-dinitrotoluene
1 ,2-diphenylhydrazine
f 1 uoranthene
bis(2-choroethoxy) me thane
methylene chloride
naphthal ene
N-nitrosodi methyl am ine
N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine
phenol
bis(2-ethylhexyl ) phthalate
butyl benzyl phthalate
diethyl phthalate
dimethyl phthalate
benzo (a) anthracene
Stream
Code
E-6
E-6
E-6
E-6
E-6
E-6
E-6
E-6
E-6
E-6
E-6
E-6
E-6
E-6
E-6
E-6
E-6
E-6
E-6
E-6
E-6
E-6
Sample
3
1
3
1
3
1
3
3
3
3
3
3
1
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
Concentrations Cmg/1)
Source
0.762
0.005
ND
ND
ND
0.015
0.001
ND
0.002
0.001
ND
0.001
ND
0.001
0.001
0.024
ND
0.001
0.001
**
ND
ND
Day 1
0.010
0.540
ND
ND
0.680
ND
0.810
**
0.001
0.001
0.001
ND
- 0.160
0.002
0.001
0.018
**
**
• 0.003
ND
ND
ND
Day 2
1 .159
0.720
0.006
ND
ND
ND
0.010
**
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
ND
0.001
0.001
0.021
**
0.003
0.002
0.001
0.004
ND
Day 3
0.576
0.820
ND
0.005
**
ND
0.019
ND
0.086
0.001
0.001
0.002
ND
0.002
- 0.001
0.016
**
**
0.005
ND
ND
**

-------
                Table V-54  (Continued)

NICKEL-COBALT EXTRUSION PRESS HYDRAULIC FLUID LEAKAGE
             RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
Toxic
73.
75.
76.
.: . . - 78.
81 .
Ul
O): - - --83.
l~i
, 84.
1 1-4 .
1 15.
117.
118.
. 119.
•:' ,.' 120.
121 .
122.
123.
124.
125.
126.
127.
Pol lutant
Pollutants (Continued)
benzo(a)pyrene
benzo(k)f 1 uo ran thane
chrysene
anthracene
phenanthrene .
indeno( 1 , 2 , 3-c ,d)pyrene
pyrene
ant imony
arsenic
beryl 1 ium
cadmium
chromium (total )
copper
cyanide (total )
1 ead
mercury
nickel
sel eni urn
si 1 ver
thai 1 i urn
Stream
_ Code
E-6
E-6
E-6
E-6
E-6
:-, E_g -
E-6
E-6
E-6
: E-6
E-6
E-6
E-6
' E-6
E-6
E-6
E-6
E-6
E-6
E-6
Sampl e
3
3
3 .
- -3- . 	 	
3
	 3
,,3
: ,.3
3
1 : 3
, .:3
,3
3
." O
; ; '' ;s
•3
,3
3
3
3
Concentrations (mg/1)
Source
ND
ND
ND
:_- ND_ :
ND
ND
ND
<0.005
<0.005
<0.010
<0.050
<0.100
0.080
<0.02
<0.100
<0.0010
<0. 100
<0.010
<0.002
<0.002
Day 1
17.40
**
ND
: 0.002 -
ND
ND
0.001
<0.005
<0.005
<0.010
<0.050
<0. 100
0.620
<0.02
0.240
<0.0010
0.510
<0.010
<0.002
<0.002
Day 2
ND
ND
ND
: ..ND— -
0.001
: ND
, 0 . 00 1
<0.005
<0.005
<0.010
<0.050
, <0 . 1 00
0.180
;
-------
                Table V-S4  (Continued)

NICKEL-COBALT EXTRUSION PRESS HYDRAULIC FLUID LEAKAGE
             RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
Pol lutant
Toxic Pollutants (Continued)
128. zinc
Nonconventional Pollutants

Acidity
Alkal inity
A Tumi num
Ammonia Nitrogen
Barium
Ul
00 Boron
NJ
Cal cium
Chemical Oxygen Demand

Chloride
Cobalt
Fluoride

I ron

Magnesium
Manganese
Mol ybdenum
Phenol ics

Phosphate
Sodi um
Stream
Code
E-6


E-6
E-6
E-6
E-6
E-6
E-6
E-6
E-6
E-6
E-6
E-6

E-6

E-6
E-6
E-6
E-6

E-6
E-6

Sample Concentrations Cmg/U
Type Source
3 <0.050


3 <1
3 83
3 0.300
3 0.22
3 0.060
3 0.170
3 33.0
3 34
3 26
3 <0.100
3 0,44

3 1 .0

3 15.8
3 0.140
3 <0.200
1 0.014

3 16
3 33

Day 1
0.310

^ •)
^> I
120
0.800
0. 19
0.120
0.400
34.2
330
24
<0. 100
0.39

3.5

14.4
0. 100
<0.200
8.5

21
71

Day 2
0.100

<1

150
0.200
0.19
0.080
0. 140
32.8
18
24
<0. 100
0.69

1 .6

15.0
0.080
<0.200
2.421

18
75


Day 3
0.240

<1

150
0.500
0.37
0.070
0.460
30.4
890
21
<0. 100
0.64

2 . •!

13.3
0.110
<0.200
9.52

30
80


-------
                                    Table V-54  .(Continued)

                    NICKEL-COBALT EXTRUSION PRESS HYDRAULIC FLUID LEAKAGE
                                 RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA







01
00
U)


Pol 1 utant
Nonconvent ional Pollutants (Continued)
Sulfate
Tin
Ti tanium
Total Dissolved Solids (TDS)
Total Organic Carbon (TOC) '.
Total Solids (TS)
Vanadium . - - . .
Yttrium
Conventional Pollutants
Oi 1 and Grease
Total Suspended Solids (TSS)
pH (standard units)
Stream
Code
•E-6
E-6
E-6
E-6
E-6.
E-6 '
E-6 ._
E-6
E-6
E-6
E-6
Sampl e
3
3
3
3
3 -
3
•- 3
3 '
1
3
3
Concentrations (mg/1)
Source
170
<0.200

-------
                           Table V-55

             NICKEL-COBALT FORGING SPENT LUBRICANTS
 Plant

   1
   1
   5
   3
   2*
   4

Average
    Water Use
L/kkg     gal/ton
   2.10
   6.80
  NR
  NR
  NR
  NR

   4.45
 0.50
 1.63
NR
NR
NR
NR

 1.07
Percent
Recycle

100
100
100
 NR
  P
 NR
                     Wastewater Discharge
                      L/kkg     gal/ton
 0.00
 0.00
 0.00
 0.00
 2.55
NR

 2.55
 0.00
 0.00
 0.00
 0.00
 0.61
NR
                         0.61
 P - Periodic discharge
NR - Data not reported

*This plant no longer forms nickel.
                               584

-------
                           Table V-56

           NICKEL-COBALT FORGING CONTACT COOLING WATER

Plant
1
2
3
4 -.•
5 .
6
Water
L/kkg
1,197
208.2
225.3
417.0
323.4
NR
Use ;
gal/tori
° }
287.6
49. ,94
54.02
100.6
77.56
NR 1
Percent
Recycle
95.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
NR
                                             Wastewater Discharge
                                              L/kkg     gal/ton
Average
474.1
113.7
 53.52
208.2
225.3
417.0
323.4
 NR

245.5
 12.83
 49.94
 54.02
100.0
 77.56
 NR

 58.9
NR - Data not reported
                              585

-------
                 Table V-57

NICKEL-COBALT FORGING CONTACT COOLING WATER
        RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
Toxic
1 1 .
13.
23.
44.
66.
86.
Ul
05 1 14.
a\
1 15.
117.
1 18.
1 19.
120.
122.
123.
124.
125.
Pol lutant
Pol lutants
1,1, 1-trichloroethane
1 , 1 -dichl oroethane
chloroform
methylene chloride
bis(2-ethylhexy 1 ) phthalate
to 1 uene
antimony
arsenic
beryl 1 i um
cadmium
chromium (total)
copper
lead
mercury
ni ckel
sel eni um
Stream
Code
D-6
D-6
D-6
D-6
D-6
D-6
D-6
D-6
D-6
D-6
D-6
D-6
D-6
D-6
D-6
D-6
Sample
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Concentrations Cmg/1 )
Source Day
0.009
ND
0. 144
ND
0.009
ND
<0.003
<0.003
<0.0005
<0.002
0.042
0.068
<0.084
<0.0002
<0.003 •
<0.003
> 1 Day 2 Day 3
0.030
0.012
0.022
0.071
0.002
0.005
<0.003
<0.003
0.077
0.26
0.69
3.4
<0.084
<0.002
16
<0.003

-------
           Table V-57  (Continued)

NICKEL-COBALT FORGING CONTACT COOLING WATER
        RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
Po1 lutant
Toxic Pollutants (Continued)
126. silver
127. thallium
128. zinc
Nonconvent i onal Pollutants
- Acidi ty .
Alkalinity
tn A 1 umi num
	 - CO — - . - — --..--
"J. Ammonia Nitrogen
• " 	 - ' Barium ' 	 : 	
Boron
Calcium
Chemical Oxygen Demand
Chloride
:,; Cobal t
Fluoride
Iron'
Stream
Code
D-6
D-6
D-6

D-6
D-6.
-D-6
D-6
'D-6
D-6
D-6
D-6
D-6
D-6
D-6
D-6 ;
Sample Concentrations (mg/1 )
Type - Source
1 <0.001
1 <0.003
1 0.038

1 . <1
1 180
1 <0.050
1 <1
':1 0.12
1 <0.009
1 63
1 <5
1 34
1 <0.006
1 0.45
1 0.066
Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
<0.001
<0.003
0.054

<1 .. . .
'250
-0.93_.. -----
0.30 .
' * 0.066
0.91
66
<5
37
0.61
0.81
4.0

-------
           Table V-57  (Continued)

NICKEL-COBALT FORGING CONTACT COOLING WATER
        RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
Pol lutant
Nonconventlonal Pollutants (Continued)
Magnesium
Manganese
Molybdenum
Phosphate
Sodium
Sulfate
Ul Tin
CD
00 Titanium
Total Dissolved Solids (IDS)
Total Organic Carbon (TOO
Total Solids (TS)
Vanadium
Yttrium
Stream
Code

D-6
D-6
D-6
D-6
D-6
D-6
D-6
D-6
D-6
D-6
D-6
D-6
D-6
Sample
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Concentrations (mg/1)
Source
24
0.012
0.030
<4
9.5
53
<0. 12
<0.005
393
8
395
0.016
<0.002
Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
24
0.24
4.9
<4
9.4
37
<0. 12
0.62
310
30
2,300
0.33
0.002

-------
                                           Table  V-57   (Continued)
                                NICKEL-COBALT  FORGING CONTACT COOLING WATER
                                        RAW WASTEWATER .SAMPLING DATA
                  Pol 1utant

      Conventional  Pollutants

      Oi1 and  Grease

      Total  Suspended Solids  (TSS)

      pH  (standard  units)
                                              Stream
                                               Code
D-6

D-6

D-6
                       Concentrations  (mg/1)
                                                                  Source
                    7. 14
1 ,800

    7.63
Ul
oo
to
       1.  The .fo,l 1 owing  toxic  pollutants  were  not  detected  in  this  waste, stream:   1-10,  12, 14-22,
          24-43,  45-65,  67-85,  87,  and  88.               .    '
      2.  No analyses  were performed  on  the  following  toxic  pollutants:   89-113,  116,  and 129.

-------
                           Table V-58

       NICKEL-COBALT FORGING EQUIPMENT CLEANING WASTEWATER
 Plant

   1
   1

Average
    Water Use
L/kkg     gal/ton
  13.9
  66.1

  40.0
 3.33
15.8

 9.57
Percent
Recycle

  0.0
  0.0
                     Wastewater Discharge
                      L/kkg     gal/ton
13.9
66.1

40.0
 3.33
15.8

 9.57
                               590

-------
                           iTable V-59

       NICKEL-COBALT FORGING PRESS HYDRAULIC FLUID LEAKAGE
 Plant

   1

Average
    Water Use   ;
L/kkg     gal/ton
  NR

  NR
NR

NR
Percent
Recycle

 NR
                     Wastewater Discharge
                      L/kkg     gal/ton
187.0

187.0
44.84

44.84
NR - Data not reported
                               591

-------
                                               Table V-60


                          •NICKEL-COBALT FORGING PRESS HYDRAULIC FLUID LEAKAGE
                                      RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
10
to
           Pollutant


Toxic Pollutants


 11.  1 , 1 , 1-trichloroethane


 13.  1 , 1-dichloroethane


 23.  chloroform


 44.  methylene chloride


 66.  bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate


 81.  phenanthrene


114.  antimony


115.  arseni c


117.  beryl Hum


118.  cadmium


119.  chromium  (total)


120.  copper


122.   lead


123.  mercury


124.  ni ckel


125.  selenium


126.  silver


127.   thallium
Stream
Code
D-7
D-7
D-7
D-7
D-7
D-7
D-7
D-7
D-7
D-7
D-7
D-7
D-7
D-7
D-7
D-7
D-7
D-7
Sample
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Concentrations
Source Day 1
•0.009
ND
0. 144
O.OQ2
0.009
ND
<0.003
<0.003
<0.0005
0.002
0.042
0.068
<0.084
<0.0002
<0.003
<0.003 	
<0.001
<0.003
(mg/1)
Day 2 Day 3
2.050
0.374
ND
0.012
0. 175
0.087
<0.003
<0.003
<0.0005
0.012
0. 19
1 .0
0.40
<0.0002
.0.64
<0.003
<0.001
<0.003

-------
               Table V-60  (Continued)

NICKEL-COBALT FORGING PRESS HYDRAULIC FLUID LEAKAGE
            RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
Pol lutant
Toxic Pollutants (Continued)
128. __ zinc
Nonconvent i onal Pollutants -
Acidity
Al kal i ni ty
Al umi num
Ammonia' Nitrogen
-Barium
Boron
tn -- -.--
*& Calcium '-•'
W
Chemical Oxygen' Demand ::
Chloride
Cobalt "'•• . •>-
Fl uoride
Iron
Magnesium . . i - . '
Manganese
Mo lybdenum
Phosphate
Sodium ,
Sulfate ' •
Stream Sample
Code Type
D-7 1
D-7 1
D-7 1
D-7 1
D-7 • 1
. ___ ._ . .
D-7 ' 1
D-7 1
' - 	 D-7 	 -1
D-7 : 1
D-7 1
; D-7 : '. 1
D-7 . 1
D-7 . .: 1
' - : D-7 -1 .
D-7 1
'.' . . D-7 ' '; -1
, D-7 ' 1
D-7 1
Concentrations (mg/1)
Source Day
0.038
<1
180
<0.050
<1
0.12
<0.009
63
<5
34
<0.006
0.45
0.066
24
0.012
0.030
<4
9.5
53
1 Day 2 Day 3
0,26 . .
<1
220
<0.050
0.25
0.23 -
0.12
75 -
4,110
47
^0.099 i •
.0.97
2.1 . ' •
26
o.o83 : , -
0.24 . • -
<4
'27
110

-------
vo
                                          Table V-60  (Continued)

                           NICKEL-COBALT FORGING PRESS HYDRAULIC FLUID LEAKAGE
                                       RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
Pol lutant
Nonconvent 1 ona 1 Pollutants (Continued)
Tin
Titanium
Total Dissolved Solids (TDS)
Total Organic Carbon (TOC)
Total Solids (TS)
Vanadium
Yttrium
Conventional Pollutants
Oi 1 and Grease '
Total Suspended Solids (TSS)
pH (standard units)
Stream
Code
D-7
D-7
D-7
D-7
D-7
D-7
D-7
D-7
D-7
D-7
Sample Concentrations (mg/1)
Type Source
i
1 <0.12
1 <0.005
1 393
1 8
1 395
1 0.016
1 <0.002
1 <1
1 <1
1 7.14
Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
<0. 12
0. 11
1 ,480
470
2,000
<0.002
0.26
17
500
6.81
      1.  The following toxic pollutants were not detected in this waste stream:   1-10,  12,
          14-22, 24-43, 45-65, 67-80, and 82-88.

      2.  No analyses were performed on the following toxic pollutants:  89-113,  116,  121, and  129.

-------
                           Table V-61

                          NICKEL-COBALT
         METAL POWDER PRODUCTION ATOMIZATION WASTEWATER
               Water Use   i
 Plant     L/kkg     gal/ton
                           , i
                       622.0
                       484 ,,p
                        NR i
                       628.9
                     2,120 !
                     4,066 I
                    18,050 !
1
2
3
4
1
5
6
2,594
2,020
NR
2,623
8,840
16,960
75,270
Percent
Recycle
0.0
0.0
NR
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Wastewater Discharge
L/kkg gal/ton
1,277
2,020
2,429
2,623
5,291
16,960
75,270
306.3
484.4
582.5
628.9
1,269
4,066
18,050
Average  18,050
4,329 j
15,120
3,627
NR - Data not reported
                              595

-------
                                                Table V-62


                       NICKEL-COBALT METAL POWDER PRODUCTION ATOMIZATION WASTEWATER
                                       RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
U1
VD
a\
           Pollutant


Toxic Pollutants


114.  ant imony


115.  arsenic



117.  beryllium



118.  cadmium




119.  chromium (total)





120.  copper





121.  cyanide (total)



122.  lead





123.  mercury



124.  nickel
Stream
Code
D-19
D-19
S-3
D-19
BJ-1
D-19
S-3
BJ-1
D-19
S-3
T-1
BJ-1
D-19
S-3
T-1
BJ-1
S-3
T-1
D-19
S-3
T-1
BJ-1
D-19
S-3
D-19
S-3
T-1
BJ-1
Samp 1 e
Type
1
1
2
1
2
1
2
2
1
2
6
2
1
2
6
2
1
1
1
2
6
2
1
2
1
2
6
2
Concentrations (mg/1)
Source
<0.003
<0.003
<0.01
<0.0005
—
<0.002
<0.05
-
0.042
<0.05
<0.01
-
0.068
<0.05
0.048
-
<0.01
<0 . 0 1
<0.084
<0.1
<0.005
-
O.0002
<0.0002
<0.003
<0.200
0.075
-
Day 1 Day 2
<0.003
<0.003
<0.01
<0.0005
<0.05
o.ooa
<0.05
0.004
1 .0
54.9
8.3 0.22
0.38
<0.031
2.080
45.000 5.400
3.200
<0.01
<0.01
<0.084
<0. 1
<0.005 <0.005
0.240
<0.0002
<0.0002
0.42
180.0
81.0 1.600
210.0
Day 3










0.026



0.0044


<0.01


<0.0054





1 . 100


-------
                   Table V-62 (Continued)

NICKEL-COBALT METAL POWDER PRODUCTION ATOMIZATION WASTEWATER
                RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
Pol 1 utant
Toxic Pol lutants (Continued)
125. selenium
126. silver
127 . thai 1 ium
128. zinc
Nonconventiona 1 Pol -lutants-- :
(Jl
VO Acidity
-J ' ' 	 '.......
A 1 kal i ni ty
Al urni num
Stream
Code
D-19
D-19
D-19
D-19
S-3.
~BJ-I;- —
D-1.9
D-19 :
D-19
.S-3
T-1
Sample
1
1
1
1
2
	 2 — ~
1
6
1
1
2
6
Concentrations (mg/1)
Source
<0.003
<6.001
<0.003
0.038
<0.05
0
180
<0.050
<0.2
0. 14
Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
<0.003
0.006
0.006
0.22
.0.231
— Or33Q 	 — 	 — 	 - — . 	 	 	 	 	 — • 	 	 	 	 	 -
	 0 '.0. . 	
4.1 ' - :
<0.050
0.292
0.630 0.110 0.041

-------
                                           Table V-62 (Continued)


                        NICKEL-COBALT METAL POWDER PRODUCTION ATOMIZATION WASTEWATER
                                        RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
tn
<£>
03
                  Pollutant


       Nonconvent1ona1  Pollutants (Continued)


       Ammonia Nitrogen


       Barium


       Boron


       Calcium


       Chemical  Oxygen  Demand


       Chloride


       Cobalt
       Fluoride






       Iron






       Magnesium


       Manganese


       Molybdenum



       Phosphate


       Sodium


       Sulfate
Stream
Code
D-19
D-19
D-19
D-19
D-19
D-19
D-19
S-3
T-1
BJ-1
D-19
S-3
T-1
BJ-1
D-19
S-3
T-1
BJ-1
D-19
D-19
D-19
BJ-1
D-19
D-19
D-19
Samp 1 e
Type
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
6
2
1
2
6
2
1
2
6
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
Concentrations (mg/1)
Source
<1
0
<0
63
<5
34
<0
<0
<0

0
<0
1

0
0
0

24
0
0

<4
9
53

.12
.009



.006
. 1
.01
-
.45
. 1
.01
-
.066
.122
.27
-

.012
.030
-

.5

Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
<1
<0
0
1
<5
<0
5
0
1 1
.0
-1 1
<0

<0
0
142
40
10
0
0
' 3
2
<4
1
a

.001
. 15
.4

.01
.2
.270
.000 0.250 0.240
. 100

. 1
0.89 0.95
. 1
.29
.0
.0 0.46 0.280
.3
.51
.22
. 1
.9

.3
.7

-------
                   Table V-62 (Continued)

NICKEL-COBALT METAL POWDER PRODUCTION ATOMIZATION WASTEWATER
                RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA


en
VD
vo

Pol 1 utant
Nonconvent ional Pollutants (Continued)
Tin
Ti tani um
Total Organic Carbon (TOO
Total Solids (TS) " : ... - -
Vanadium , " ..
•Yttrium • -
Stream
Code
D-19
D-19
BJ-1
D-19
D-19
D-19"
D-19.
D-19
Sample
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
Concentrations (mg/1) . '.
Source
<0. 12
<0
393
8
395
0
<0
.005
g

10
.016
.002
Da
<0.
0.
0.
000
2
;ooo
. o.
0.
y 1 Day 2 Day 3
12
031
210

017 :
002 -

-------
                                           Table V-62 (Continued)

                        NICKEL-COBALT METAL POWDER PRODUCTION ATOMIZATION WASTEWATER
                                        RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
                  Pollutant

       Conventional Pollutants

       Oi1  and Grease



       Total Suspended Solids (TSS)



       pH (standard units)
                                              Stream
                                               Code
D-19
S-3
T-1
D-19
S-3
T-1
D-19
S-1
T-1
1
1
1
1
2
6
1
2
6
	Concentrations (mg/1)	
Source    Day 1    Day 2    Day 3
  ).1;0.4  0. 1 ; 1 . 1  0.1;6.1 0.3;5.1
<0.1    317
 1.0              10.0      12.0

 7.14     5.54
          7.2-8.3
 7.7               7.7      7.76
O
O
       1.  No analyses were performed on the following toxic pollutants:  1-113, 116, and 129.

       2.  Note that stream code T-1 also appears on the metal  powders metal powder production
           wet atomization wastewater raw wastewater sampling data table.  The wastewater is
           derived from an operation in both subcategories.

-------
                           Table V-63

     NICKEL-COBALT STATIONARY CASTING CONTACT COOLING WATER
 Plant

   1
   2
      Water Use  i
  L/kkg     gal/ton
 7,193
17,030
Average  12,112
1,725
4,084

2,904
Percent
Recycle

100
  0.0
                        Wastewater Discharge
                         L/kkg     gal/ton
     0.00
16,755

16,755
    0.00
4,018

4,018
                               601

-------
                           Table V-64



          NICKEL-COBALT VACUUM MELTING STEAM CONDENSATE
Plant
1
2
.Water Use
L/kkg gal/ton
NR NR
6,955 1,665
Percent
Recycle
NR
98.0
Wastewater Discha
L/kkg gal/to
0.00 0.00
139.0 33.33
Average   6,955
1,665
139.0
33.33
NR - Data not reported
                               602

-------
                  Table V-65

NICKEL-COBALT VACUUM MELTING STEAM CONDENSATE
         RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA


Toxic
5.
1 1 .
12.
23.
28.
36.
-'37.
O^
O 43.
U)
. 55.
61 .
63.
66.
67.
70'.
1 14.
' 1 15. '
117.
1 18.
119.
120.
121 .
122.

Pol 1 utant
Pol 1 utants
benzidine
1 , 1 , 1-trichloroethane
hexachl oroethane
chl orof arm
3,3 '-di clil orobenzid-ine
2 , 6-dini trotol uene .
1 , 2-dipheny 1 hydrazlne 	
bis(2-choroethoxy) me thane
naphthalene
N-ni t rosodimethy 1 ami ne •
N-ni trosodi-n-propy Vamine
bis(2-ethy Ihexyl ) phthalate
butyl benzyl phthalate
diethyl phthalate
antimony
arsenic
beryl 1 i um
cadmi um
chromium ( total )
copper
cyanide (total)
lead
Stream Samp] e
Code Type

E-4 • 1
E-4 1
E-4 1
E-4 1
: E-4 1
E-4 1 .
E-4 .-- - l-_
E-4 1
E-4 : • 1
' E-4 1
E-4 . . 1
E-4 1
E-4 1
E-4 : . 1 .
E-4 ' 1
E-4 1
E-4 , 1
E-4 1
E-4 , , 1
E-4 1
E-4 . ' 1
E-4 ' 1
Concentrat i
Source Day 1

0.762
0.005
ND
0.015
. 0.001
ND
- 0...001 _._!_.
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.024
0.001
0.001 :
** .
<0.005
<0.005
<0.010
<0.050
<0.100
0.080
<0.02
<0.100
ons (mg/ I )
Day 2 Day 3

**
0.001
0.004
ND
ND
0.002 ::
ND •. ' •
ND
0.001 :
ND ' -' --
0.018 ;;
0.001 ,,
ND -
* * '••
<0.005

-------
            Table V-6S  (Continued)

NICKEL-COBALT VACUUM MELTING STEAM CONDENSATE
         RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
Pol lutant
Toxic Pol lutants (Continued)
123. mercury
124. nickel
125. selenium
126. silver
1 27. thai 1 ium
O\ 128. zinc
O
*>
Nonconventional Pollutants
Acidi ty
Al kal ini ty
Al uminum
Ammonia Nitrogen
Barium
Boron
Cal cium
Chemical Oxygen 'Demand
Chi oride
Cobal t
F 1 uoride
Iron
Magnesi um
Stream
Code

E-4
E-4
E-4
E-4
E-4
E-4

E-4
E-4
E-4
E-4
E-4
E-4
E-4
E-4
E-4
E-4
E-4
E-4
E-4
Sample
1
1
1
1
1
1

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Concentrations (ma/1)
Source Daj

-------
                                    Table V-65  (Continued)

                        NICKEL-COBALT VACUUM MELTING STEAM CONDENSATE
                                 RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
Pol 1 utant
Nonconvent ional Pollutants (Continued)
Manganese
Mol ybdenum
Phenol i cs
Phosphate
Sodium

Ti tani urn
Total Dissolved Solids (TDS)
Total Organic Carbon (TOO
Total Solids (TS)
Vanadium
Yttrium
Conventional Pollutants
Oi 1 and Grease
Total Suspended Solids (TSS)
pH (standard units)
Stream
Code
E-4
E-4
E-4
E-4
E-4
E-4
E-4
E-4
E-4
E-4
E-4
E-4
E-4 '
E-4
E-4
Sample Concentrat
Type Source Day
1 0.140
1 <0.200
1 0.014
1 16
1 33.0
1 <0."200
1 <0.020
1 330
1 <1
1 380
1 <0.010
1 <0.020
1 <1
1 29
1 6.71
i ons (mg/ 1 )
1 Day 2 Day 3
0.280
<0.200
0.006
1 1
10.2
SB
<0. 200
<0.020
32
<1
46
<0.010
<0.020
6
4.3
6.20 	 ""
1.   The following toxic pollutants were not detected in this waste stream:  1-4, 6-10,
    13-22,  24-27, 29-35,  38-42,  44-54, 56-60, 62, 64, 65, 68, 69, and 71-88.

2.   No analyses were performed on the following toxic'pol1utants:  89-113, 116, and 129.

-------
                           Table V-66

       NICKEL-COBALT ANNEALING AND SOLUTION HEAT TREATMENT
                      CONTACT COOLING WATER

Plant
1
12
2
1
3
1
1
1
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
13
14
15
16
17
Water
L/kkg
NR
NR
133.4
7,028
19,060
2,002
0.27
NR
111,000
NR
444.6
697.6
NR
1,334
3,236
3,470
171,500
178,900
NR
NR
NR
NR
Use
gal/ton
NR
NR
32.00
1,685
4,571
^480.1
0.06
NR
26,560
NR
106.6
167.3
NR
319.9
776.1
832.2
41,120
42,910
NR
NR
NR
NR
Percent
Recycle
100
100
0.0
100
<100
100
0.0
NR
99.99
NR
0.0
0.0
p
0.0
0.0
0.0
95.6
0.0
NR
0.0
NR
NR
Wastewater
L/kkg
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.27
2.82
13.56
45.00
222.3
697.6
760.6
1,334
3,236
3,470
7,621 1
178,900 42
NR
NR
•NR
NR
Discharge
gal/ton
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.68
3.25
10.79
53.31
167.3
182.4
319.9
776.1
832.2
,828
,910
NR
NR
NR
NR
Average  38,370
9,197
16,360
3,924
 P — Periodic discharge
NR - Data not reported
                               606

-------
                                Table V-67

NICKEL-COBALT ANNEALING AND SOLUTION HEAT TREATMENT CONTACT COOLING WATER
                       RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
Toxi c
1 1 .
44.
55.
66.
1 14.
115.
117.
O\
O
118.
1 19.
120.
121 .
122.
123.
124.
125:
Pol 1 utant
Pol 1 utants
1 , 1 , 1-trichloroethane
methylene chloride
'naphthalene
bis(2-ethy 1 hexy 1 ) phthalate
antimony
arsenic
beryl 1 i urn
cadmium
chromium (total)
copper
cyanide
lead
mercury
nickel
se 1 eni urn
Stream
Code
F-17
F-17
F-17
F-17
D-8
F-17
D-8
F-17
D-8
F-17
D-8
F-17
D-8
F-17.
D-8
F-17
F-17
D-8
F-17
D-8
F-17
D-8
F-17
. D-8
•F-17
Sampl e
Concentrations (mg/1)
Type Source Day 1
1 0
1 0
1 0
1
1 <0
1 <0
. 1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 0
1 <0
1 0
1 0
1. <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 0
1 <0
1 <0
.014
.002
.001
ND
.003
.002
.003
.005
.0005
.010'
.002
.050
.042
.100 .
.068
. 170
.02
.084
. 100 ;
.0002
.0020 	
.003
.200
.003
.010
Day 2 Day 3
ND
0

0
<0
<0
.. <0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
0
<0
0
2
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
0
6
<0
<0
.267
ND
.005
.003
.002
.003
.005
.0005
.010
.002
.050
.10
.100
.028
.92
.02
.084
. 100
.0002
.0020 ' ' -
.49
.80 -
.003
.010 •

-------
                                           Table V-67   (Continued)

                NICKEL-COBALT ANNEALING AND  SOLUTION HEAT  TREATMENT CONTACT COOLING WATER
                                       RAW WASTEWATER  SAMPLING DATA
(T\
O
09
           Pollutant

Toxic Pollutants (Continued)

126.  silver


127.  thallium



128.  zinc


Nonconvent iorial  Pollutants

Acidity




Alkalinity



A 1uminum


Ammonia Nitrogen


Barium


Boron



Calcium


Chemical Oxygen Demand


Chloride


Cobalt
Stream
Code
D-8
F-17
D-8
F-17
D-8
F-17
D-8
F-17
D-8
- F-17
D-8
F-17.
D-8
F-17
D-8
F-17
D-8
F-17
D-8
F-17
D-8
F-17
D-8
F-"17
D-8
F-:1'7
Samole Concentrations (mg/1)
Type Source Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
1 <0.001 <0.001
1 <0.002 0.003
1 <0.003
1 <0.005
1 <0.038
1 <0.050
1 <1
1 <1
1 180
1 61
1 <0.050
1 0.910
1 <1
1 0.04
1 0.12
1 0.080
1 <0.009
1 <0.100
1 63
1 46 . 2
1 <5
1 <1
1 34
1 12
1 <0.006
1 <0.100
<0.003
0.006
0.018
0.760
<1
<1
170
98
<0.050
0.840
0.14
0.04
0.14
' 0.020
<0 . 009
4.11
60
41 .3
<5
4,000
45
23
0.046
<0.100

-------
                          Table V-67  (Continued)

NICKEL-COBALT ANNEALING AND SOLUTION HEAT TREATMENT CONTACT COOLING WATER
                       RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
Pol 1 utant
Stream Sample
Code Type
Concentrations (mg/1)
Source
Day 1 Da
y. 2 Day 3
Nonconvent ional Pollutants (Continued) - . . , . .
Fl uori de
Iron
Magnesium

Mo 1 ybdenum
Pheno tics
Phosphate
Sodium
Sulf ate
Tin '
Titanium
Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) '
Total Organic Carbon (TOO
Total Solids (TS)
Vanadium
D-8 1
F-17 1
D-8 1
F-17 1
D-8 1
F-17 1
D~8 1
F-17 1
D-8 1
F-17 1
F-17 1
D-8 1
F-17 1
D-8 1
. -F-17 1
D-8 1
,F-17 1
D-8 1
F-17 1
D-8 1
F-17 1
D-8 	 1
F-17 'I
D-8. 1 .
F-17 1
D-8 1
F-17 1
D-8 1
F-17 1
0.45
0.43
0.066
1 .37
24
12.7
0 012
0.080
0.030
<0.200
<0.005
<4
<4
9.5
154
53
130
' <0. 12
<0.200
<0.005
<0.020
393
320
8
2
395
330
0.016
<0.010
1 .
9.
0.
19.
8
6
17
2
26
9.30-
0 0^0
5.50;
1 .
2.

-------
                                          Table V-67  (Continued)
O\
H
O
                NICKEL-COBALT ANNEALING AND SOLUTION HEAT TREATMENT CONTACT COOLING WATER
                                       RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
           Pollutant

Nonconventional  Pollutants (Continued)


Yttrium


ConventionaI  PoI 1utants

011  and Grease


Total Suspended Solids (JSS)


pH (standard units)
Stream
Code
D-B
F-17
D-8
F-17
D-8
F-17
D-8
F-17
Sample Concentrations (mg/O
Type Source
1 <0.002
1 <0.020
1 <1
1 <1
1 <1
1 • 22
1 7.14
1 6.64
Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
<0.002
<0.020
40
7
33
78
7.00
7.37
      1.  The following toxic pollutants were not detected in this waste stream:  1-10, 12-43,
          45-54, 56-65, and 6-7-88.
      2.  No analyses were performed on the following toxic pollutants:  89-113, 116, and  129.

-------
                         !  Table V-68

           NICKEL-COBALT JSURFACE TREATMENT SPENT BATHS
                 Plant

                  1
                  2
                  3
                  4
                  5
                  6
                  7
                  7  •
                  8
                  9
                 10
                 11
                 10
                 12
                 10
                 13
                 14
                 10
                 10
                 10
                 15
                 16
                 10
                 17
                 18
                 19
                 20
                 21
                 22
                 23
                 24
                  8
                 25
                 26
                 22
                 27
                 28  ,
                 29
                 30
            Average
NR - Data not reported
**Volume of spent bath
     Wastewater Discharge**
      L/kkg;       gal/ton





























1
4
5
7






0.00
0.00
'0.00
0.00
6. 00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.22
2.64 •
4.89
6.71
8.16
14.41
15.98
25.72
26.72
44.30
63.74
91.80
100. 1
128.3
229.5
231.7
259.2
292.0
819.0
881 . 9
934.1
,186
,612 -
,560
,832
NR
NR
NR
NR .
NR
NR ;
0.00
0.00
o.oo
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.53
0.63
1.17
1.61
1.96
3.46
3.83
6.17
6.41
10.62
15.29
22.01
24.00
30.77
55.04
55.57
62.17
70.10
196.0
2li.5
224.0
284.4
1,106
1,333
1,878
NR
NR .
NR
NR
NR
NR
       934.5
224.2
per mass of, nickel surface treated.
                               611

-------
                                                      V-68
                              NICKEL- COBALT SURFACE TREATMENT SPENT BATHS
                                      RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
          Pollutant
                                      Stream
                                       Code
                                                          Source
Concentrations (mg/l)
a\
H
N>
     Toxic Pollutants
     114.  antimony
     115.  arsenic
     117.  beryl 1ium
     118.  cadmium
     119.  chromium (total)
     120.  copper
     121.  cyanide
      122.  lead
      123.  mercury
D-13
F-28
F-29
F-30
D-13
F-28
F-29
F-30
D-13
F-28
F-29
F-30
D-13
F-28
F-29
F-30
D-13
F-28
F-29
F-30
D-13
F-28
F-29
F-30
F-28
F-29
F-30
D-13
F-28
F-29
F-30
D--13
F-28
F-29
F-30
1 <0.003
1 <0.003
1 <0.002
1 
-------
                                         Table V-69 (Continued)


                              NICKEL-COBALT SURFACE TREATMENT SPENT BATHS
                                      RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
          Pollutant
     Toxic Pollutants (Continued)
Stream
 Code
                                                                   Concentrations (mg/1)
                                                          Source
     124.   nickel
     125.   selenium
D-13
F-28
F-29
F-30
D-13
F-28
F-29
F-30
1 <0.
1 0.
1 0.
1 0.
1 <0.
1 <0.
1 <0.
1 <0.
003 39,000
200
200
200
003 <0.003
010
010
010

124
272
193,000

<0
0
<0





.010
.080
.010
(ft
M
UJ

-------
                                           Table V-69  (Continuad)

                                NICKEL-COBALT SURFACE TREATMENT SPENT BATHS
                                        RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
OV
H
*>•
     Pollutant

Toxic Pollutants (Continued)

126.  silver




127.  thallium




128.  zinc




Nonconventional Pollutants

Acidity




Alkalinity




Aluminum




Ammonia Nitrogen




Barium
                                        Stream
                                         Code
                                         D-13
                                         F-28
                                         F-29
                                         F-30

                                         D-13
                                         F-28
                                         F-29
                                         F-30

                                         D-13
                                         F-28
                                         F-29
                                         F-30
D-13
F-28
F-29
F-30
D-13
F-28
F-29
F-30
D-13
F-28
F-29
F-30
D-13
F-28
F-29
F-30
D-13
F-28
F-29
F-30
1 <1
1 <1
1 <1
1 <1
1 180
1 61
1 61
1 61
1 <0
1 0
1 • 0
1 0
1 <1
1 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
i - o








.050
.910
.910
.910

.04
.04
.04
. 12
.080
.080
.080
                                                              Concentrations (mg/1)
Source
<0.001
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
0.038
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
Day 1 Day 2 pay 3
0.016
0.008
0.002
0.096
0.088
<0.005
<0.005
0.050
39
1 .86
0 . 240
83.2
                                                                       185
                                                                                         1 ,500
                                                                                        >1,000
                                                                                        >a,ooo
                                                                       190
                                                                         2.7
                                                                                            73.5
                                                                                           312
                                                                                             2.31
                                                                                             0.03
                                                                                             8.5
                                                                                             0.48
                                                                                             0.510
                                                                                             0.680
                                                                                             0.270

-------
                                    Table V-69   (Continued)

                         NICKEL-COBALT  SURFACE TREATMENT  SPENT  BATHS
                                 RAW WASTEWATER  SAMPLING  DATA
     Pollutant
Stream
 Code
Nonconventional' Pollutants (Continued)

Boron
Calcium
Chemical Oxygen Demand
                                                     Source
                                                              Concentrations  (mg/1)
D-13
F-28
F-29
F-30
D-13
F-28
F-29
F-30
D-13
F-28
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
<0.

-------
                                           Table V-69  (Continued)

                                NICKEL-COBALT SURFACE TREATMENT SPENT BATHS
                                        RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
                                        Stream
            Pollutant                    Code

       Nonconventional Pollutants (Continued)
                                                                     Concentrations  (mg/1)
 a\
 H
, 01
       Chloride
       Cobalt
       Fluoride
       Iron
       Magnesi urn
       Manganese
       Molybdenum
       Phenolics
       Phosphate
0-13
F-28
F-29
F-30

D-13
F-28
F-29
F-30

D-13
F-28
F-29
F-30

D-13
F-28
F-29
F-30

D-13
F-28
F-29
F-30

D-13
F-28
F-29
F-30

D-13
F-28
F-29
F-30

F-28
F-29
F-30

D-13
F-28
F-29
F-30
 1
 1
 1
 1

 1
 1
 1
 1

 1
 1
 1
 1

 1
 1
 1
 1

 1
 1
 1
 1

 1
 1
 1
 1

 1
 1
 1
 1

 1
 1
 1

 1
 1
. 1
 1
Source Day 1
34 260
12
12
12
<0.006 4,000
<0.100
<0.100
<0.100
0.45 94,000
0.43
0.43
0.43
0.066 4,000
1 .37
1 .37
1 .37
24 6.8
12.7
12.7
12.7
0.012 240
0.080
0.080
0.080
0.030 910
<0.200
<0.200
<0.200
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
-<4 <4
<4
<4
<4
Day 2 £5X_3

330
6.5
10,000

<0. 100
0.180
4.00

14
33
3,400

180
300
2,500

192
164
178

6.50
6.62
174

0.810
9.25
130
<0-005
<0.005
<0.005

40
150
<4

-------
           Table V-69  (Continued)

NICKEL-COBALT SURFACE TREATMENT SPENT BATHS
        RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA

Pol 1 utant
Nonconvent ional
Sodium



Sulfate



Stream
Code
Pollutants (Continued)
D-13
F-28
F-29
F-30
D-13
F-28
F-29
F-30
Sample
Type Source

1 9.5
1 - 154
1 .154
1 154
1 53
1 130
1 130
1 . 130
Concentrations (mg/1)
Day 1 Day 2 Day 3

1 ,600
5,800
5,500
7,700
<0.5
3, ion
4,700
46,000

-------
                                          Table V-69  (Continued)

                               NICKEL-COBALT SURFACE TREATMENT SPENT BATHS
                                       RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
           Pollutant
                                       Stream
                                        Code
O\
H
00
Nonconventional Pollutants (Continued)

Tin




Titanium




Total Dissolved Solids (TDS)




Total Organic Carbon  (TOC)




Total Solids  (TS)




Vanadium




Yttrium




Conventional  Pollutants

Oi1  and Grease                     D-13
                                   F-28
                                   F-29
                                   F-30
                                                     Source
                                                              Concentrat ions (mg/1)
                                                                  Dav I     Day 2
D-13
F-28
F-29
F-30
D-13
F-28
F-29
F-30
D-13
F-28
F-29 •
F-30
D-13
F-28
F-29
F-30
D-13
F-28
F-29
F-30
D-13
F-28
F-29
F-30
D-13
F-28-
F-29
F-30
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
<0.12
<0.200
<0.200
<0.200
<0.005
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
393
320
320
320
8
2
2
2
395
330
330
330
<0.005
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.005
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
                                                                       <0.12
                                                                    3,300
                                                                  200,000
130
                                                                  350,000
                                                                      260
                                                                                           <0.200
                                                                                           <0.200
                                                                                           <0.200
                                                                                            2.06
                                                                                           36.5
                                                                                          104
                                                                                       36,000
                                                                                       59,000
                                                                                      180,000
                                                                                           27
                                                                                       24,000
                                                                                           89
                                                                                       38,000
                                                                                       75,000
                                                                                      190,000
                                                                        0.35
                                                                       <1
                                                                                            0.110
                                                                                            0.540
                                                                                            0.031
                                                                                           <0.020
                                                                                           <0.020
                                                                                           <0.020
                                                                                          120
                                                                                           66

-------
                                         Table  V-69  (Continued)

                              NICKEL-COBALT SURFACE TREATMENT SPENT BATHS
                                      RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
Stream Samp
Pollutant Code Typ(
Conventional Pollutants (Continued)
Total Suspended Solids (TSS). D- 1 3 1
F-28 1
• F-29 1
F-30 1
pH (standard units) D-13 1
F-28 1
F-29 1
F-30 1
1 . No. anal yses were performed. on the following
e Concentrati
2 Source Day 1

<1 <1
22
22
22
7. -14 1.72
6.64
6.64
6.64
toxic pollutants: 1-113',
3ns (mg/1 )
Day 2 Day 3


5,800
2,700"
340

7.87
1.21
0.89
116, and 129.
vo

-------
                           Table V-70
              NICKEL-COBALT SURFACE TREATMENT RINSE
Water Use
Plant
1
9
10*
11
12
13
14
15
13
2
14
13
16
17
18
18
19
20
21
22
18
23
24
25
26
28
3
4
5
6
7
8
27
L/kkg
168.4
11.06
28.82
67.83
100.1
186.3
459.9
513.2
806.5
835
1,030
1,051
1,390
2,503
3,260
4,141
4,689
19,540
27,730
34,010
46,240
80,360
127,000
209,300
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
gal/ton
40.38
2.65
6.91
16.27
24.00
44.67
110.3
123.1
193.4
200
247.0
252.0
333.3
600.3
781.8
993.1
1,124
4,687
6,649
8,157
11,090
19,270
30,460
50,200
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
Percent
Recycle
<100
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
o.o
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR*
Wastewater Discharge
L/kkg
0.00
11.06
28.82
67.83
100.1
186.3
459.9
513.2
806.5
835
1,030
1,051
1,390
2,503
3,260
4,141
4,689
19,540
27,730
34,010
46,240
79,830
127,000
209,300
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
gal/ton
0.00
2.65
6.91
16.27
24.00
44.67
110.3
123.1
193.4
200
247.0
252.0
333.3
600.3
781.8
993.1
1,124
4,687
6,649
8,157
11,090
19,140
30,460
50,200
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
Average  23,560
5,650
24,550
5,889
NR - Data not reported.
*Nickel forming no longer performed by this plant.
                               620

-------
              Table V-71

NICKEL-COBALT SURFACE TREATMENT RINSE
     RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
           Stream    Sample
                                   Concentrations  (mg/1)
Toxit
5.

1 1 .
12.

23.
28.
36.

37.
a\ 43.
to
I-1 55.
61 .
62.

63.
66.

67.
70.
71 .

81 .

: Pol 1 utants
benzidine

1 , 1 , 1-trichl oroethane
hexachloroethane

ch 1 orof orm
3,3'-dichlorobenzidine
2 , 6-di ni t-roto 1 gena ....

1 ,2-diphenylhydrazine
bis(2-chl oroethoxy) me thane
naphthalene
N-ni trosodimethy 1 ami ne
N-ni trosodipheny lam ine

N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine
bis(2-ethylhexy 1 ) phthalate

butyl benzyl phthalate
diethyl phthalate
dimethyl phthalate

phenanthrene

Code Typp
E— Q i
-8 1
E-8 i
E-8 l

E-8 i
E-8 !
- - - -•
0 j
E-8 i
E-8 ' 1
E-6 i
. E-8 . 1
E-8 , 1
U. (J 1 J
E-8 i
E-8 - 1

E-8 i
E-8 !
E-8 i

E— A i
O ~ 	 1 -
Source D;

0.762
0.005
Mn
INU
0.015
0.001

O'roo"2 ~~
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001

ND
0.024
0.001

0.001
**
Kin
INU

ND "
ay 1 Day 2 Day 3

0.965
0.020 - '

0.006
ND
ND

0.002
ND
**
0.001
0.001

0.196
0.023

0 . 002
0.001
* *

0.003

0.001

-------
                                          Table V-71  (Continued)
                                  NICKEL-COBALT  SURFACE TREATMENT RINSE
                                       RAW WASTEWATER  SAMPLING DATA
                 Pollutant
      Toxic Pollutants  (Continued)
      114.  antimony
      115.  arsenic
cn
to
to
      117.  beryl 1iurn
                                              Stream
                                               Code
D-10
E-2
E-8
F-7
F-8
F-9
F-10
F-1 1

D-10
E-2
E-8
F-7
F-8
F-9
F-10
F-1 1

D-10
E-2
E-8
F-7
F-8
F-9
F-10
F-1 1
         Sample
          Type
6
2
1
4
4
3
'3
3

6
2
1
4
4
3
3
3

6
2
1
4
4
3
3
3
            Concentrations (mg/l)
Source
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
.003
.005
.005
.002
.002
.002
.002
.002
.003
.005
.005
.005
.002
.005
.005
.002
.0005
.010
.010
.010
.010
.010
.010
.010
Day 1
<0
<0
<0
0
0
0
0
0
<0
<0
<0
<0
0
0
<0
0
0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
.003
.005
.005
.002
.002
.160
.011
.050
.003
.005
.005
.005
.002
.030
.005
.050
.002
.010
.010
.010
.010
.010
.010
.010
Day 2
<0
<0

<0
0
0
0
0
<0
<0

<0
0
<0
<0
0
<0
<0

<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
.003
.005

.002
.002
.016
.013
.013
.003
.005

.005
.002
.005
.005
.013
.0005
.010

.010
.020
.010
.010
.010
Day 3
<0
<0
<0
0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
0
<0
<0
<0
<0
0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
.003
.005
.005
.019
.002
.002
.002
.002.
.003
.005
.005
.012
.002
.005
.005
.002
.0005
.010
.010
.010
.010
.010
.010
.010

-------
                                           Table V-71  (Continued)

                                   NICKEL-COBALT.SURFACE TREATMENT  RINSE
                                        RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING  DATA
                 Po11utant
     Toxic  Pol 1utants (Continued)
      118.   cadcni um
0\
K)
CO
                                              Stream
                                               Code
                                          D-10
                                          E-2
                                          E-8
                                          F-7
                                          F-8
                                          F-9
                                          F-10
                                          F-1 1
-1-19.— eh-rcmritim-t-t-a-fra-1-)	'-	'	D—1-0-
                                       .   E-2
                                          E-8
                                          F-7
                                          F-8
                                          F-9
                                          F-10
                                   !       F-11
                                                                       Concentrations  (mg/1)
      120.   copper
      121.   cyanide (total)
                                          D- 1 0
                                          E-2
                                          E-8
                                          F-7-'
                                          F-8
                                          F-9
                                          F-10
                                          F-1 1

                                          E-2
                                          E-8
                                          F-7
                                          F-8

                                          F-10
                                          F-1 1
 6
 2
 1
 4
 4
 3
 3
 3

-6-
 2
 1
 4
 4
 3
 3
 3

 6
 2
 1
'4
 4
 3
 3
 3

 2
 1
 4
 4
^3
 3
 3
Source
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
-0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
<0
<0
<0

-------
                                          Table V-71   (Continued)

                                  NICKEL-COBALT SURFACE  TREATMENT  RINSE
                                       RAW WASTEWATER  SAMPLING DATA
                 Pollutant

      Toxic Pollutants (Continued)

      122.  lead
      123.  mercury
O\
to
      '124.  nickel
      1 25.  se1eni urn
                                              Stream
                                               Code
D-10
E-2
E-8
F-7
F-8
F-9
F-10
F-11

D-10
E-2
E-8
F-7
F-8
F-9
F-10
F-11

D-10
E-2
E-8
F-7
F-8
F-9
F-10
F-1 1

D-10
E-2
E-8
F-7
F-8
F-9
F-10
F-1 1
                       Concentrations (ma/I)
6
2
1
4
4
3
3
3

6
2
1
4
4
3
3
3

6
2
1
4
4
3
3
3

6
2
1
4
4
3
3
3
Source
<0.084
<0.100
<0.100
<0.100
<0.100
<0.100
<0.100
<0.100
<0.0002
<0.0010
<0.0010
<0.0020
<0.0020
<0.0020
<0.0020
<0.0020
<0.003
<0.100
<0.100
0.200
0.200
0.200
0.200
0.200
<0.003
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
Day 1
0
<0
<0
0
<0
0
<0
<0
0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
76
0
24
174
7
105
107
4
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
.26
. 100
. 100
. 180
. 100
.340
.100
.100
.0002
.0010
.0010
.0020
10020
.0020
.0020
.0020

.300
.6

.04


.59
.003
.010
.010
.010
.010
.010
.010
.010
Day 2
0. 10
<0. 100

<0. 100
<0.200
<0. 100
0. 120
<0. 100
<0.0002
<0.0010

<0.0020
<0.0020
<0.0020
<0.0020
<0.0020
18
2.20

124
12.0
51 .2
159
57.6
<0.003
<0.010

<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
Day 3
< 0 . 084
<0.100
<0. 100
0. 180
<0. 100
<0. 100
<0. 100
<0. 100
0.0004
<0.0010
<0.0010
<0.0020
<0.0020
<0.0020
<0 .0020
<0.0020
25
1 .30
183
364
19.4
96.8
97.0
196
<0.003
<0.010
<0.010
• 0.1110
•
-------
                                                   Table  V-71   (Continued)

                                           NICKEL-COBALT  SURFACE TREATMENT RINSE
                                                RAW WASTEWATER  SAMPLING DATA -
                          Pollutant

               Toxic  Pollutants (Continued)

               126.   silver
	1 -21-—;.t n a-}.-|- i-u m—
         Cft
         to
         en
               128.   zinc
                                                      Stream
                                                        Code
                                                        D-10
                                                        E-2
                                                        E-8
                                                        F-7
                                                        F-8
                                                        F-9
                                                        F-10
                                                        F-1 1
--O—W-
 E-2
 E-8
 F-7.
 F-8
 F-9
 F-10
 F-1 1

 D-10
 E-2
 E-8
 F-7
 F-8
 F-9
 F-10
 F-1 1
                         Concentrations  (mg/J)
Sou
<0 .

-------
                                          Table V-71  (Continued)
                                  NICKEL-COBALT SURFACE TREATMENT RINSE
                                       RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
                 Pol lutant
Stream
 Code
    Concentrations (ma/1)
Source    Day 1    Day 2
      Nonconventional  Pollutants

      Acidity
      Alkalinity
EO
      Alumi num
D-10
E-2
E-8
F-7
F-8
F-9
F-10
F-11
D-10
E-2
E-8
F-7
F-8
F-9
F-10
F-1 1
D-10
E-2
E-8
F-7
F-8
F-9
F-10
F-1 1
6
2
1
4
4
3
3
3
6
2
1
4
4
3
3
3
6
2
1
4
4
3
3
3
i
180
83
83
61
61
61.
61
61
<0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0









.050
.300
.300
.910
.910
.910
.910
.910
15
130
300
10
130
<,
47
<1
<1
170
<1
<1
29
1 .
0.
0.
<0.
0.
2.
0.
0.









5
100
960
020
240
76
360
220
49
140
140
130
<,
50

<1
76
<1
<1
15
0.
0.

<0.

0.
0.
0.









58
120

020

220
180
770
85
198
390
140
190
87
<,
51
<1
<1
79
<1
<1
<1
0
0
<0
<0
0
0
<0
<0









.78
.060
.020
.020
. 160
.020
.020
.020

-------
                                          Table V-71  (Continued)

                                  NICKEL-COBALT SURFACE TREATMENT RINSE
                                       RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
                 Po11utant
                                             Stream
                                              Code
                       Concentrations  (mg/1)
      Nonconventional  Pollutants (Continued)

      Ammonia Nitrogen
      Bari um
NJ
      Boron
      Calcium
D-10
E-2
E-8
F-7
F-8
F-9
F-10
F-l 1

D-10
E-2

F-7
F-8
F-9
F-10
F-1 1

D-10
E-2
E-8
F-7
F-8
F-9
F-10
F-11

D-10
E-2
E-8
F-7
F-8
F-9
F-10
F-1 1
 6
• 2
 1
 4
 4
 3
 3
 3

 6
 2
_!_
 4
 4
 3
 3
 3

 6
 2
 1
 4
 4
 3
 3
 3

 6
 1
 1
 4
 4
 3
 3
 3
Source

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

.22
.22
.04
.04
.04
.04
.04
. 12
.060
Day 1
-- - 0.
3.
0.
0.
0.
' 14
50
0.
0.
0.
24
3
55
26
89


31
15
040
Day 2
0
25

0
3
13
15
0
0
0
.53


. 18
.2


.35
.23
.040
0 nfin n nsn
0
0
0
0
0
<0
0
0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
63
33
33
46
46
46
46
46
.080
.080
.080
.080
.080
.009
. 170
. 170
. 100
.100
. 100
. 100
. 100

.0
.0
.2
.2
.2
.2
.2
0.
0.
0.
. 0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1 .
0.
98
24.
18.
32.
31 .
38.
29.
13.
060
060
720
060
030
97
1 10
200
440
550
680
32
1 10

0
4
0
9
2
,5 	
8
0

0
0
0
<0
<0

0

0
8
0
940
25

32

32
- .26
21
.060

.080
.040
.060
.009
. 100

.220

.420
.82
.460

.9

. 1

.7
.5 . ...
.2
Day 3
0
6
130
0
1
14
6
1
0
0
o
0
•Q
0
0
0
<0
<0
0
1
0
0
0
0
660
24
18
37
30
32
- -21
30
.47
.2

. 16
.4

.7
.5
.10'
.030
-,,0-4-0- -
.080
.070
.060
.040"
.070
.009
. 100
.470
.34
.830
.240
.510
.840

.5
.9
.0
.2
. 1
..0 ...
.9

-------
                                          Table V-71   (Continued)

                                  NICKEL-COBALT SURFACE TREATMENT RINSE
                                       RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
                 Pollutant

      Nonconventlonar  Pollutants (Continued)

      Chemical  Oxygen  Demand  (COD)
                                             Stream
                                              Code
      Chloride
tO
00
      Cobalt
      Fluoride
D-10
E-2
E-8
F-7
F-8
F-9
F-10
F-11
D-10
E-2
E-8
F-7
F-8
F-9
F-10
F-1 1

D-10
E-2
E-8
F-7
F-8
F-9
F-10
F-1 1

D-10
E-2
E-8
F-7
F-8
F-9
F-10
F-1 1
6
2
1
4
4
3
3
3

6
2
1
4
4
3
3
3

6
2
1
4
4
3
3
3
Concentrations Cmg/1)
Source
<5
34
34
*'
34
26
26
12
12
12
12
12
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0









.006
. 100
.100
.100
.100
. 100
. 100
. 100
.45
.44
.44
.43
.43
.43
.43
.43
Di
12
10
50
13
97
36
110
49
<0
35
26
81
47
130
10
4
<0
<0
<0
<0
0
<0
<0
0
0
0
42
3
1
0
9



.05






.0
.100
. 100
.10'0
.100
. 180
.100
. 100
.91
.26
.40

.2
. 1
.85
.6
Da
72
18
59
71
50
77
230
175
22

89
37
88
190
38
1 .
<0 .

<0 .


-------
                                          Table V-71 (Continued)
                                  NICKEL-COBALT SURFACE TREATMENT RINSE
                                       RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
                 Pollutant
      Iron
      Magnesi urn
vo
Stream
Code
(Continued)
D-10
E-2
E-8
F-7
F-8
F-9
F-10
F-l 1
D-10
E-2
E-8 '.
: F-? -
F-8
F-9
F-10
F-l 1
Sampl e
Type

6
2
1
4
4
3
3
3
6
2
1
4
4
3
. 3
3
Concentrations (mg/1)
Source

0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
24
15
15
12
12
12
12
12

.066
.00
.00
.37
.37
.37
.37
.37

.8
.8
.7
.7
.7
.7
.7
Day 1

27
0.
31 ,
37.
3,
22.
29.
8.
25
1 1 .
6.
10.
9.
1 1-.
7.
4.


.696
.0
.6
.37
.4
.6
.30

. 1
.0
.2
.54
.2
.66
.36
Day 2

5
0

35

13
84
1 1
18
12

10

10
6
5

.6
.750

.0

. 1
.5
.3

.4

.4

.4 '
.33
.05
Day 3

7
0
32
1 17
8
17
37
26
17
1 1
6
1 1
8
9
6
8

.4
.380
.5

.12
. 1
.3
.4

.8
.20
.2
.35
.40
.23
.55

-------
I
                                                       Table  V-71   (Continued)

                                               NICKEL-COBALT  SURFACE TREATMENT  RINSE
                                                    RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
                              Pollutant

                  Nonconvent1onal  Pollutants  (Continued)
                  Manganese
                                                          Stream
                                                           Code
                   Mo 1ybdenum
             U)
             o
                   Phenolics
                   Phosphate
D-10
E-2
E-8
F-7
F-8 -
F-9
F-10
F-1 1

D-10
E-2
E-8
F-7
F-8
F-9
F-10
F-11

E-2
E-8
F-7
F-8
F-9
F-10
F-1 1

D-10
E-2
E-8
F-7
F-8
F-9
F-10
F-1 1
         Sample
          Type
6
2
1
4
4
3
3
3

6
2
1
4
4
3
3
3

1
1
1
1
1.
1
1

6
2
1
4
4
3
3
3
            Concentrations (mg/l)
Source
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
0.
0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<4
16
16
<4
<4
<4
<4
<4
012
140
140
080
080
080
080
080
030
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
014
014
005
005
005
005
005








Day 1
0
0
0
1
• o
1
1
34
9
<0
<0
1
<0
1
<0
<0
<0
0
0
<0
<0
0
<0
<4
8
<4
<4
10
<4
<4
<4
.50
.050
.630
.46
.620
.99
.90
.0
.6
.200
.200
.50
.200
.20
.200
.200
.005
.016
.025
.005 •
.005
.045
.005








Day 2
0
0

0

0
2
9
1!7
<0

0

0
<0
<0
0

<0
0
<0
0
0
9
. 6

<4
<4
<4
<4
<4
.14
.020

.740

.570
.28
.93

.200

.670

.250
.200
.200
.082

.005
.009
.005
.025
.019

.6






Day 3
0
<0
2
2
0
0
1
27
13
<0
<0
2
0
<0
<0
<0
0
0
<0
<0
<0

-------
                                          Table V-71  (Continued)

                                  NICKEL-COBALT SURFACE TREATMENT RINSE
                                       RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
                 Pollutant
                                             Stream
                                              Code
                       Concentrations  (mg/1)
      Nonconvent1onal  Pollutants (Continued)
      Sodium
      Sulfate
GJ
      Tin
      Ti tanium
D-10
E-2
E-8
F-7
F-8
F-9
F-10
F-1 1
D-10
E-2
E-8
F-7
F-;8
F-9
F-10
F-1 1

D-10
E-2
E-8
F-7
F-8
F-9
F-10
F-1 1

D-10
E-2
E-8
F-7
F-8
F-9
F-10
F-1 1
6
2
1
4
4
3
3
3

6
2
1
4
4
3
3
3

6
2
r
4
4
3
3
3
Source
9
33
33
154
154
154
154
154
53
170
170
130
130
130
130
130
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
.5
.0
.0













. 12
.200
.200
.200
.200
.200
.200
.200
.005
.020
.020
.020
.020
.020
.020
.020
Day 1
30
20
58
28
175
35
157
107
140
140
700
250
170
290
520
57
1
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
" <0
12
<0
' 0
0
0
3
0
0

.0
.0
.0

.0


2







.7
.200
'.<200
.200
.200
.200
.200
.200

.020
. 090"
.970
. 160
.31
.370
.090
Day 2
520
26.

28.

49.
184
134
,400
260

200
150
220
770
93
1 .
<0.

<0.

<0.
<0.
<0.
3.
0.

0.

0.
0.
0.

6

6

0


2,

1 ,





1
200

200.

200
200
200
6
020
_ . . . -,..-
500

290
290
140 .
Day 3
330
27.
133
43.
1 15
61 .
82.
184
200
210
300
260
130
320
400
130
1 .
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
12
<0.
'0.
1 .
0.
0.
0.
. o.

0

0

0
0









6
200
200
200
200
200
200
200

020
T50~
54
290
290
120
290

-------
                                          Table V-71  (Continued)
                                 NICKEL-COBALT SURFACE TREATMENT RINSE
                                     RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
               Pollutant
Stream
 Code
    Nonconvent1ona1 Pollutants (Continued)
    Total Dissolved Solids (TDS)
    Total Organic Carbon (TOO
U>
NJ
 D-10
 E-2
 E-8
 F-7
 F-8
 F-9
 F-10
 F-11

 D-10
 E-2
 E-8
 F-7
 F-8
 F-9
 F-10
 F-11
                                                                    Concentrations  (mg/l)
Source
393
330
330
320 1
320
320
320 1
320

8
<]
2
2
2
2
2
Day
800
270
920
,240
670 -
700
,300
610

38
10
3.8
10
3
9
45
_L Pay
4,900
180

860
490
670
1 ,800
730
r
46,
<1
2,
3
4
23
35
2 Day 3
3,800
330
2,000
2, 100
560
800
870
1 ,400

13
3.9
4
4
4
5


-------
                                         Table V-71  (Continued)

                                 NICKEL-COBALT SURFACE TREATMENT RINSE
                                      RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
                Pol 1utant
                                            Stream
                                             Code -
                        Concentrations (ing/1 )
     Nonconventional  Pollutants (Continued)

     Total  Solids (TS)
     Vanadi urn
CO
     Yttrium
     Conventional  Pollutants
 —	Oil and Grease
D-10
E-2
E-8
F-7
F-8
F-9
F-10
-F-i-t— -

D-10
E-2
E-8
F-7
F-8
F-9
F-10
F-l 1

D-10
E-2
E-8
F-7
F-8
F-9
F-10
F-11
                                             D-10
                                             E-2
                                             E-8
                                             F-7
                                             F-8
                                             F-9
                                             F-10
                                             F-1 1
  6
  2
  1
  4
  4
  3
  3
—3

•  6
  2
  1
  4
  4
  3
  3
  3

  6
  2
  1
  4
  4
  3
  3
  3
           • 1
            1
            1
            1
            1
            1
           T
            1
Source
395
380
380
330
330
330
330
330
0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
_ <-i
<1
<1
<1
•<1
<1
<1
<1



1

1
1

.016
.010
.010
.010
.010
.010
.020
.010
.002
.020
.020
.020
.020
.020
.020
.020








Da
900
250
930
,300
820
,510
,510
•860-
0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
0.
<0.
<0.
0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.

<1
3
7.
7.
17
5.5
130
y 1
5





1
"~~ "
52
010
010
010
010
020
010
010
015
020
020
020
020
020
020
020



8
0



Day 2
,700
240

970
530
780
,800
-9-50
0
<0

<0

<0
<0
<0
0
<0

<0

<0
<0
<0
5
3

3
5
<1
14
43
4

2
2

1
. 1
-r
. 12
.010

.010

.020
.010
.010
.004
.020

.020

.020
.020
.020








D_a
,200
330
,070
,200
570
,030
, 110
76OTT
0.
<0.
<0.
0.
0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
3
<1
<1
3
<1
<1
<1
<1
y 3








26
010
010
015
022
020
010
010
009
020
020
020
020
020
020
020
_ -








-------
                                          Table V-71  (Contlnuad)

                                  NICKEL-COBALT SURFACE TREATMENT RINSE
                                       RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
                 Pollutant
      Conventional Pollutants (Continued)
      Total  Suspended Solids (TSS)
Oi
Ul
      pH (standard units)
                                             Stream
                                              Code
D-10
E-2
E-8
F-7
F-8
F-9
F-10
F-l 1
D-10
E-2
E-8
F-7
F-8
F-9
F-10
F-1 1 •
                       Concentrations (mg/1)
6
2
1
4
4
3
3
3
Source
<1
29
29
22
22
22
22
22
7.
6.
6.
6.
6.
6.
6.
6.








14
71
71
64
64
64
64
64
Day 1
100
4
7
200
110
670
80
140
3
6
2
2
8
3
2
5


.4





.90
.39
.71
.79
.70
.39
.85
.69
Day 2
760
1 1

33
40
35
12
90
3
7

3
7
3
2
5








.40
.35

.36
.21
.28
.33
.24
Da
150
3.
7.
100
96
19
6
9
• 3.
7
2.
2.
7.
2.
2.
3.
Y_3

3
3





40
16
74
41
78
75
59
03
      **Present, but not quantifiable.

      1.   The following toxic pollutants were not detected in this waste stream:  1-4, 6-VO, 13-22,
          24-27, 29-35, 38-42, 44-54, 56-60, 64, 65, 68, 69,  72-80, and 82-88.

      2.   Note that stream code Y-4 also appers on the titanium surface treatment rinsewater raw
          wastewater sampling data table.  The wastewater is derived from an operation in both
          subcategories.
      3.   No analyses were performed on the following toxic pollutants:  89-113, 116, and 129.

-------
                        ,   Table V-72

                   NICKEL-COBALT AMMONIA RINSE
                 Plant

                  2
                  1
                  2

                 Average i
Wastewater Discharge*
 L/kkg       gal/ton
   11.66
   12.84
   19.76

   14.75
2.80
3.08
4.74

3.54
*Volume of spent rinse per mass of nickel-cobalt,
                              635

-------
         Table V-73

NICKEL-COBALT AMMONIA RINSE
RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
Toxic
U .
44.
55.
68.
1 14.
1 15.
117.
1 18.
a\ ii9.
U)
<7> 120.
121 .
122.
123.
124.
125.
126.
127.
128.
Pol lutant
Pol lutants
1.1, 1-trichloroethane
rnethylene chloride
naphthalene
di-n-butyl phthalate
ant imony
arsenic
beryl 1 ium
cadmium
chromium (total )
copper
cyanide
lead
mercury
nickel
sel eni um
si 1 ver
thai 1 i um
zi nc
Stream Sample
Code Type
F-19 1
F-19 1
F-19 1
F-19 1
F-19 1
F-19 1
F-19 1
F-19 1
F-19 1
F-19 1
F-19 1
F-19 1
F-19 1
F-19 1
F-19 1
F-19 1
F-19 1
F-19 - 1
Concentrations (mo/1)
Source
0.014
0.002
0.001
ND
<0.002
<0.005
<0.010
<0.050
<0.100
0. 170
<0.02
<0. 100
<0.0020
0.200
<0.010
<0.002
<0.005
<0.050
Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
ND
0.950
ND
0.028
0.020
0.160
<0.010
<0.050
108
54.0
<0.02
0.540
<0.0020
456'
0.070
0.020
<0.005
32.0
Nonconvent ional Pollutants
Acidi ty
Alkal
i ni ty
Al umi num
F-19 1
F-19 1
F-19 1
<1
61 1
0.910
<1
,500
160

-------
   Table V-73  (Continued)  .

NICKEL-COBALT AMMONIA RINSE
RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
Pol 1 utant
Stream
Code
Sampl e
Concentrations (mg/1)
Type Source Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
Nonconvent i onal Pollutants (Continued)
Ammonia Nitrogen
Bari um
Boron
Cal ci um
Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD)
	 Chi ori de
CTl
to Cobalt
Fluoride
Iron
Magnesium
Mangane'se
Molybdenum
Phenolics
Phosphate
Sodium
Sulfate
Tin
Ti tani um
Total Dissolved Solids (TDS)
Total Organic Carbon (TOO
F-19
F-19
F-19
F-19
F-19
: -F-19
F-19
" F-19
F-19
F-19
F-19
F-19
F-19
F-19
F-19
F-19
F-19
F-19
F-19
F-19
1 0.
1 0.
1 <0.
1 46.
1 . <1
1 12
1 <0.
1 0.
1 1 .
1 12.
1 0.
1 <0.
1 <0.
1 <4
1 154
1 130
1 <0.
1 <0.
1 320
1 2
040 -<0.01
080 <0.020
100 5.74
2 94.4
840
6,500- - _• - •
100 <0.100
43 1 .5
37 592
7 17.4
080 50.7
200 11.8
005 0.011
<4
770 ;
33,000 •
200 <0.200
020 0.540
32,000
16 •

-------
                                    Table V-73  (Continued)

                                 NICKEL-COBALT AMMONIA RINSE
                                 RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA






OJ
00
Pol lutant
Nonconvent i onal Pollutants (Continued)
Total Solids (TS)
Vanadium
Yttrium
Conventional Pollutants
Oi 1 and Grease
Total Suspended Solids (TSS)
pH (standard un'its)
Stream
Code

F-19
F-19
F-19
F-19
F-19
F-19
Sample Concentrations (mg/1)
Type Source Day 1 Day 2 fi.i,_ 3
1 330 100,000
1 <0.010 0.070
1 <0.020 <0.020
1 <1 <1
1 22 9,000
1 6.64 7.90
1.  The following toxic pollutants were not detected in this waste stream:   1-10,  12-43,
    45-54, 56-67,'and 69-88.

2.  No analyses were performed on the following toxic pollutants:   89-113,  116,  and 129.

-------
                         j  Table V-74             ;

           NICKEL-COBALT iALKALINE CLEANING SPENT BATHS
                 Plant

                   1*
                   1*
                   2
                   3
                   4
                   5
                   4
                   4
                   6
                   4
                   7
                   4
                   8
                   4
                   9
                   10
                   11
                   12
                   13
                   14
                   15
                   16
                   17

                 Average
Wastewater Discharge**
 L/kkg       gal/ton
    1,
    2,
    2,
    4,
    ,20
    00
    64
    00
  4.08
 10.7
 12.84
 33.91
 37.91
 56.68
 90.61
114.8
131.0
196.7
213.3
 NR
 MR
 NR
 NR
 NR
 NR
 NR
 NR

 60.82
 0.29
 0.48
 0.63
 0.96
 0.98
 2.56
 3.08
 8.13
 9.09
13.59
21.73
27.52
31.40
47.17
51.15
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR

14.58
NR - Data not reported
                         i
 *Nickel forming no longer performed at this plant
**Volume of spent bath per mass of nickel cleaned.
                              639

-------
                                                Table V-75

                                NICKEL-COBALT ALKALINE CLEANING  SPENT BATHS
                                        RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING  DATA
*»
O
           Pollutant


Toxic Pollutants

 11.  1,1,1-trichloroethane

 44.  methylene chloride

 55.  naphthalene





 66.  bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate





114.  antimony





115.  arsenic





117.  bery11ium





118.  cadmium





119.  chromium (total)
Stream
Code
F-12
F-12
D-14
F-12
F-14
F-27
D-14
F-12
F-14
F-27
D-14
F-12
F-14
F-27
D-14
F-12
F-14
F-27
D-14
F-12
F-14
F-27
D-14
F-12
F-14
F-27
D-14
F-12
F-14
F-27
Samp 1 e
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Com
Source
0.014
0.002
ND
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.009
ND
ND
ND
<0.003
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
<0.003
<0.005
• <0.005
<0.005
<0.0005
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.002
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
0.042
<0.100
<0.100
<0.100
imtrations (mg/1)
Day 1 Day 2
ND
3.550
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
<0.003
0.043
0.200
0.020
<0.003
0. 180
<0.005
0.070
<0.0005
<0 . 0 1 0
<0.010
<0.010
0.084
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
1 .0
3.59
0.410
38.0

-------
                                    Table V-75  (Continued)
                         NICKEL-COBALT ALKALINE CLEANING SPENT BATHS
                                 RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
           Pol 1utant

Toxic Pollutants (Continued)

120.  copper
121.   cyanide, (total)
122..  lead
123.   mercury
124.   nickel
125.   selenium
126.   silver
127.   thai 1ium
128.   zinc
Stream
Code
D-14
F-12
F-14
F-27
F-12
F-14
F-27
D-14
F-12 -
F-14
F-27
D-14
F-12
F-14
F-27
D-14
F-12
F-14
• ' F-27
D-14
F-1 2
F-14
F-27
D-14
F-12
F-14
..F-27 _
D-14
: F-12
F-14
F-27
D-14
F-12
F-14
F-27
Sample Concentrations (mg/1)
Type Source
1 0.068
1 0.170
1 0.170
1 0.170
1 <0.02
1 <0.02
1 <0.02
1 <0.084
1 - :
-------
                                           Table V-75  (Continued)

                                NICKEL-COBALT ALKALINE CLEANING SPENT BATHS
                                        RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
to
           Pollutant

Nonconventlonal Pollutants

Acidity




Alkalinity




Aluminum




Ammonia Nitrogen




Barium




Boron
                                              Stream
                                               Code
                                                               Concentrations (mg/1)
                                                           Source    Day 1    Day 2
D-14
F-12
F-14
F-27
D-14
F-12
F-14
F-27
D-14
F-12
F-14
F-27
D-14
F-12
F-14
F-27
D-14
F-12
F-14
F-27
D-14
F-12
F-14
F-27
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
<1
<1
<1
<1
180
61
61
61
<0
0
0
0
<1
0
0
0
0
0
0
'0
<0
<0
<0
<0





3

150
.050
.910
.910
.910

.04
.04
.04
.12
.080
.080
.080
.009
.100
.100
.100
190
<1
<1
*1
<1
,800
29,000
,000
1
5.90
1
1 1
0
1.4
<0
<0
0
0.470
0
<0
1
1 12
88
131








. 1

.38
.9
.33

.01
.01
.22

.280
.010
.4

.0


-------
           Table V-75  (Continued)
NICKEL-COBALT ALKALINE CLEANING SPENT BATHS
        RAW WAST.EWATER SAMPLING DATA
Stream
Pol lutant Code
Nonconvent i onal Pollutants (Continued)
Calcium D-14
F-12
F-14
F-27
Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) D-14
F-12
F-14
F-27
Chloride D-14
p y> •
F-14
F-27
: Cobal t D-14
°*. F~12
- l*> F-27
Fluoride D-14
- F-12
- . . F-14
F-27
Iron D-14
: F-14
F-27
Magnesium ' D-14
. F-12
F-14
	 — 	 , . „ ~ -.,-... — . . .: _ 	 - ---... ~~ - . .- -- - ~ - - p— 27 --
Manganese D-14
F-12
.F-14
F-27
•Molybdenum - " D-14.
' ' " -. F-13
F-14
F-27
Samp) e

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
' 1
1
1
1

. 1 . .
• 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 '
1
1
1
                                      Concentrations  (mg/1)
Source
63
46.2
46.2
46.2
<5
<1 63

-------
                  V ?!•+  {Continued}
NIC KgU-CQBAI-T  ALKALINE CLEANING SPENT  BAIH',
        RAW vfuSlEWATER SAMPLING DATA

ggj Ijjtgnt
Stream
Code
Sample
Type
Concentc
Source Du
at ions (m$/l )
X_l 5SX_2
inconvent ional Pollutants (Continued)
lenol ics


losphate


Jdium



jlfate



in



i tanium



otal Dissolved Solids (TDS)



otal Organic Carbon, (TOG)



otal Solids (TS)



i - : : * - ~- : r~ ". r
N 1
I i , . :
F-12
F-14
F-27
D-14
F-12
F-14
F-27
D-14
F-13
F-14
F-27
D-14
F-12
F-14
F-27
D-14
F-13 •
F-14
F-27
D-14
F-12
F-14
F-27
.D-14
F-12
F-14
F-27
D-14
F-12
F-14
F-27-
D-14
F-12
F-14
F~27

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
i
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

<0.005 0.
<0.005
<0.005
<4
<4 1,800
<4
<4
9.5
154 3,200
154
154
53
130 2,100
130
130
<0.12
<0.20U <0.
<0.200
<0.200
<0.005
<0.020 0,
<0.020
<0.020
393
320 36,000
320
320
8
2 15,000
2
2 '
395
330 43,000
330
330
— • - . _._s-_ -
17
0.
<0.
7,000
<4
<4
270

1 ,640
49,000
400

7,900
2,500
<0.
200
<0.
<0.
0.
.960
0.
<0 .
7,000

590,000
150,000
76

770
26
7,600

630,000
260,000


45
005











12

200
200
66

720
020














-------
                                           Table V-75   (Continued)

                                 NICKEL-COBALT ALKALINE  CLEANING  SPENT  BATHS
                                         RAW WASTEWATER  SAMPLING  DATA
*>.
Ul
                   Pol 1utant
       Noneonventional  Pol 1utants  (Continued)
       Vanadi um
       Yttrium
       Conventional Pollutants
       Oi1 and Grease
       Total Suspended  Solids  (TSS)
       pH  (standard units)
Stream Sample
Code Type
D-14 1
F-12 1
F-14 1
F-27 1
D-14 1
F-12 ' 1
F-14 1
F-27 .1
D- 14. 1
F-14 1
F-27 1
D-14 1
F-12 1
F-14 1
F-27 1
D-14 1
F-12 1 •
F-14 1
F-27 1
Concentrations (mg/1)
Source Day 1
oloie
<0.010 <0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.002
<0.020 <0.020
<0.020
<0.020

<1
<1
<,
22 4,000
22
22
7.14
6.64 8.45
6.64
6.64
Day 2 Day 3
0.050

<0.010
<0.010
<0.002

<0.020
<0.020
22 • .
• 49 ' .
170
640

780
920
2.30

9.52
12.80
       1.  The folloiwng toxic pollutants were not detected in this waste  stream:   1-10,  12-43,
           45-54, .56-65, and 67-88.

       2.  No analyses were performed on the following toxic pollutants:   89-'13,  116,  and 129.

-------
                           Table V-76
              NICKEL-COBALT ALKALINE CLEANING RINSE

Plant
3
10*
4
10*
11
5
12
13
14
12
11
15
16
16
17
1
2
6
7
8
9
18
Water
L/kkg
168.4
6.95
30.29
96.23
976.7
2,140
2,325
2,778
2,843
7,107
7,149
55,180
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
Use
gal/ton
40.38
1.67
7.26
23.08
234.2
514 .
557.7
666.1
681.8
1,704
1,714
13,230
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
Percent
Recycle
<100
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
Wastewater
L/kkg
0.00
6.95
30.29
96.23.
977
2,140
2,325
2,778
2,843
7,107 1
7,149 1
55,180 13
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
Discharge
gal/ton
0.00
1.67
7.26
23.08
234.2
514
557.7
666.1
681.8
,704
,714
,230
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
Average   6,733
1,615
7,330
1,758
NR - Data not reported
*Nickel forming no longer performed by this plant.
                               646

-------
                                                Table  V-77

                                  NICKEL-COBALT  ALKALINE  CLEANING RINSE
                                       RAW WASTEWATER  SAMPLING DATA
a\
           PoI 1utant

Toxic Pollutants


 11.  1,1,1-trichloroethane

 44.  methylene chloride"

 55.  naphthalene




 58.  4-nitrophenol   _ •




 65.  phenol



 66.  bis(2-ethyIhexyl)phthalate




114.  ant i mony




115.  arsenic




117.  beryl 1iurn




118.  cadmium
Stream Samp]
Code
F-13
F-13
D-12
D-15
F-13
F-15
D-1-2
D- 1~5
F-13
F-15
D-12
D-15
F-13
D-12
D-15
F-13
F-15
D-12
D-15
F-13
F-15
D-12
D-15
F-13
F-15
D-12
D-15
F-13
F-15
D-12
D-15
F-13
F-15
Type
1
1
1
1
3
3
1
"i '"
3
3
1
1
3
1
1
3
3 '
1
1
3
3
1
1 -
3
3
l'
1
3
3
1
1
3
3
e Concentrations (mg/1)
Source
0.014
0.002
ND
ND ,
0.001
0.001
__- 	 ND- ,-
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.009
0.009
ND
ND
<0.003
<0.003
<0.002
0.0002
<0.003
<0.003
<0.005

-------
                                          Table V-77   (Continued)
                                  NICKEL-COBALT ALKALINE CLEANING RINSE
                                       RAV/ WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
00
                 Pollutant
      Toxic Pollutants  (Continued)
      119.  chromium  (total)
      120.  copper
      121.  cyanide  (total)
      122.   lead
       123.  mercury
Stream
Code
D-12
D-15
F-13
F-15
D-12
D-15
F-13
F-15
F-13
F-15
D-12
D-15
F-13
F-15
D-12
D-15
F-13
F-15
Samp la
1
1
3
3
1
1
3
3
1
1
1
1
3
3
1
1
3
3
Concent i «it iuns (my/1)
Source
0.040
-<0
<0
<0
0
0
0
0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
.068
.100
.100
.068
.068
.170
.170
.02
.02
.084
.084
.100
. 100
.0020
.0002
.0020
.0020
Day j
0. 10

<0

0

0

<0

0

<0

50

<0


. 1UO

.036

. 120

.02

. 16

. 1 00

.0020

.0020

Day ? Dd£ 3

0. 17
0.270
<0. 100

0.023
1 .50
0.400
<0.02
<0.02


-------
                                         Table  V-77   (Continued)

                                 NICKEL-COBALT  ALKALINE  CLEANING  RINSE
                                      RAW WASTEWATER  SAMPLING  DATA
                Pollutant
     Toxi c Pol 1utants (Continued)
     124.   nickel
     125.   selenium
en
**
     127.   thai 1 iurn




     128.   zinc




     Nonconventional  Pollutants

     Acidity




     Alkalinity
     A 1uminum
Stream
Code
D-12
D-15
F-13
F-16
D-12
D-l
F-13
F-15
_D-L2__ .
D-15
F-13
F-15
D-12
D-15
F-13
F-15
D-12
D-15
F-13
F-15
D-12 '
D-15
F-13
F-15
.D.-.12 _._
D-15
F-13
F-15
D-12
D-15 .
F-13
F-15
Sample
Type
1
1
3
3
6
. 1
3
3
	 __!____.
1
3
3
1
1
3
3
1
1
3
3
1
1
3
-, 3
	 	 .1. . . _ ...
1
3-.
3
1 -:
1
3
3
Concentrations (mg/1)
Source
<0.003
<0.003
' 0.200
0.200
<0.003
<0.003
<0.010
<0.010
-._<0:._00-1-
<0.001
<0.002
<0.002
<0.003
<0.003
<0.005

-------
                                                V-77  (Continued)
                                     NICKEL-COBALT ALKALINE CLEANING RINSE
                                          RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
Ul
O
           Poli lutgnt

Nonconventlonal  Pollutants (Continued)



Ammonia Nitrogen





Barium





Boron





Calci um





Chemical Oxygen Demand





Chioride





Cobalt





F1uoride





I ron
Stream
Code
D-12
D-15
F-13
F-15
D-12
D-15
F-13
F-15
D-12
D-15
F-13
F-15
D-12
D-15
F-13
F-15
D-12
D-15
F-13
F-15-
D-12
D-15
F-13
F-15
D-12
D-15
F-13
F-15
D-12
D-15
F-13
F-15
D-12
D-15
F-13
F-15
Sample
JY£S_

i
3
3
1
1
3
3
1
1
3
3
1
1
3
3
1
1
3
3
1
1
3
3
1
- '1
3
3
1
1
3
3
1
1
3
3
Concentrations (rog/1)
Source


0.04
0.04
0. 12
0.12
0.080
0.080
<0.009
<0.009
<0.100
<0. 1002
40
63
46.2
46.2
<5
<5
<1
<1
34
34
12
12
<0.006
<0.006
<0. 100
<0. 100
0.45
0.45
0.43
0.43
0.066
0.066
1 .37
1 .37
Day 1


0.62

0.13

0.030

0.094

<0. 100



22.7

<5 -

160

50

34

0.16

<0. 100

0.61

1 .0

0.38

0.980

Day 2

0.19

<0.01
0.15
0.12

0.040

0. 12



61



<5

540

54

32

0.021



' 1 .8

1 .2

0.47


Day 3


0.03



0.070



0.260
4.07


32.8
29.9


160



31



<0. 100
<0. 100


1 .0



3.24
0.260

-------
     Table V-77  (Continued)

NICKEL-COBALT MOLTEN SALT RINSE
  RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
Stream
Pol lutant Code
Nonconvent ional Pollutants (Continued)
Magnesium D-12
D--15
' 	 F-13. ...
F-15 .
Manganese - • D-12
D-15
F-13
F-15
-Molybdenum D-12 .
D-15
F-13 '
CM F-15
cn
1-1 Phenol ics F-13 •
F-6 '
Phosphate D-12 ',
D-15
F-13
F-15
Sodium D-12
D-15 '-
F-13
. ' •- F-15
S'ulfate . D-12
D-15
F-13
^ 	 - -~ • - 	 .-•- 	 .- - - • - ---.F-15 	
- Tin . D-12
D-15 '
F-13
F-.15
Titanium - D-12
D-15
- F-13
F-15
Sampl e
Type

1
1
3
3
. 1
1
3
.3
1
1
3
3

1
1
1
1
3
3
1
1
3
3
1
1
3
	 3. ,_
1
1
3
3
1
1
3
3
Concentrations (mg/1)
Source

24
24 .
12.7
12.7
0.012
0.012
0.080
<0.080
0.030
0.030
<0.200
<0 . 200

<0.005
<0.005
<4
<4
<4
<4
9.5
9.5
154
154
53
53
130
. 130
<0. 12
<0. 12
<0.200
<0.200
<0.005
<0.005
<0.020
<0.020
Day 1

30

8 .,04

0.034..

0.030

0.093

<0.200


<0.005
0.012
<4

12
1
14

27.6

59

190
._ .. - .
0.17



0.11

•0.020

Day 2 Day 3-


23
11.1
8.45

0.023
0.130
0.200

- 0.098
<0.200
<0.200 '

0.095
0.012 <0.005

<4
<4
,200

13
32.8
840

53
1 10
.340. . , 	 .- . 	 . 	 	 _ .....

<0.12
<0.200
<0.200

- 0.360-
0.040
0.090

-------
                                           Tab!a V-77  (Contlnuno)

                                      NICKEL-COBALT MOLTEN SALT RINSE
                                        RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
CTi
Ul
10
           Pollutant

Nonconventional Pollutants (Continued)




Total Dissolved Solids (TDS)





Total Organic Carbon (TOO





Total Solids  (1i)





Vanadium





Yttrium
Stream
Code
D-12
D-15
F-13
F-15
D-12
D-15
F-13
F-15
D-12
D-15
F-13
F-15
D-12
D-15
F-13
F-15
D-12
D-15
F-13
F-15
Sampl e
Type
1
1
3
3
1
1
3
3
1
1
3
3
1
1
3
3
1
1
3
3
Concentration;., lmg/l)
Source OHX_,' Day 7
393 400
393 300
320 120
320 2.600
8 3
8 5
2 25
2 82
395 390
395
330 830
330 2,700
0.016 0.062
0.010 0.028
<0.010 <0.010
<0.010 0.010
<0.002 0.008
<0.020 0.006
<0.020 <0.020
<0.020

Hay 3


31b



34


570
460



<0.010



<0.020
<0.020

-------
                                             Table V-77 (Continued)

                                     NICKEL-COBALT MOLTEN SALT RINSE
                                       RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
                 Pollutant
	Concentrations (mg/1)
Source    Day 1    Day 2
      Conventional  Pollutants
      Oi1  and Grease
      Total  Suspended Solid (TSS)
CTl
U1
CO
      pH (standard units)
D-12
D-15
F-13
F-15
D-12
F-13
F-15
D-1.2
D-15
F-13
F-15
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
1
1
3
3
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
22
22
7
7
6
6







.14
. 14
.64
.64
3

6.5

5
8.6

' 8. 14

7.48



-------
                           Table V-78

                 NICKEL-COBALT MOLTEN SALT RINSE
 Plant

   1
   2
   3
   4
   5
   4
   4
   6
      Water Use
  L/kkg     gal/ton
    33.40
   198.1
   513.2
 1,465
 2,535
 6,379
23,620
16,120
Average   6,358
    8.01
   47.50
  123.1
  351.2
  607.8
1,530
5,664
3,865

1,525
Percent
Recycle

  P
  P
  0.0
  0.0
  0.0
  0.0
  0.0
  0.0
                        Wastewater Discharge
                         L/kkg     gal/ton
    33.40
   198.1
   513.2
 1,465
 2,535
 6,379
23,620
16,120

 6,358
    8.01
   47.50
  123.1
  351.2
  607.8
1,530
5,664
3,865

1,525
P - Periodic discharge
                               654

-------
                                               Table V-79


                                    NICKEL-COBALT MOLTEN SALT RINSE
                                      RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
                Pol 1utant
     Jpx i c Pp 1.1 utants
     114.  ant imony
     115.  arsen ic
     117.  beryl 1 iurn
     118.  cadmium
Ul
Ul   119.  chromium (total)
     120.  copper
     121.   cyanide (total)
     122.   lead
     123'.   mercury
Stream
Code
D-9
E-5
F-6
D-9
E-5
F-6
D-9
E-5
~ F^6~ —
D-9
E-5
F-6
D-9
E-5
F-6
D-9
E-5
F-6
E-5
F-6
D-9
E-5
F-6
D-9
E-5
F-6
Sample
Type
6
1
3
6
6
3
6
1
~ 	 -3— .
6 '
1
. 3
6
1
3
6
1
3
1
1
6
1
3
6
	 1 	
3
Concentrations (mg/1)
Source
<0.003
<0.005
<0.002
<0.003
<0.005
<0.005
<0.0005
<0.010
	 
-------
                                          Table V-79  (Continued)

                                     NICKEL-COBALT MOLTEN SALT RINSE
                                       RAV/ WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
CT>
U1
Ol
           Pollutant

Toxic Pollutants (Continued)



124.  nickel




125.  selenium




126.  silver




127.  thallium




128.  zinc




Nonconvent i onal Pollutant's

Acidi ty




Alkalini ty




Alumi num
Stream
Code
D-9
E-5
F-6
D-9
E-5
F-6
D-9
E-5
F-6
D-9
E-5
F-6
D-9
E-5
F-6
D-9
E-5
F-6
D-9
E-5
F-6
D-9
E-5
F-6
Samp 1 a
Type
6
1
3
6
1
3
6
1
3
6
1
3
6
1
3
6
1
3
6
1
3
6
1
3
Concentrations Cmg/1)
Source
<0
<0
0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
0
<0
<0
<1
<1
<1
180
83
61
<0
0
0
.003
.100
.200
.003
.010
.010
.001
.002
.002
.003
.002
.005
.038
.050
.050



1


.050
.300
.910
Day 1
10

0
<0

<0
0

<0
0

<0
0

0
<1

<1
,600

550
0

0


.500
.003

.010
.008

.002
.013

.005
.26

.050



1


.37

.420
gay 2
5

0
<0

0
0

<0
0

<0
0

<0
<1

^
,980

740
0

0
.3

.380
.003

.012
.010

.002
.006

.005
.40

.050



1 ,
170,
1 ,
.37

.220
Da
14
<0.
1 .
<0.
0.
<0.
0.

-------
                                          Table V-7.9  (Continued)

                                     NICKEL-COBALT MOLTEN SALT RINSE
                                       RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
Ul

Pol lutant
Stream
Code
Sample
Type
Concentrations (mg/1)
Source
Day 1
Day 2 Day 3
Nonconvent ional Pollutants (Continued)
Ammonia Nitrogen


Barium


Boron
	

Calcium


Chemical Oxygen Demand


Chloride


Cobal t


F 1 uoride


I ron


D-9
E-5
F-6
D-9
E-5
F-6
D-9
	 ' Er5" '
F-6
D-9
E-5
F-6
D-9
E-5
F-6
D-9
E-5
F-6
D-9
E-5 .
F-6
D-9
E-5
- - ~ -p-g
D-9
E-5
F-6
6
1
3
6
1
3
6
1
3
6
1
3
6
1
3
6
1
3
6
1
3
6
1
3
6
1
3
<1
0
0
0
0
0
<0
0
<0
63
33
46
<5
34
<1
34
26
12
<0
<0
<0
0
0
0
0
1
1

.22
.04
. 12
.060
.080
.009__
. 170
. 100
1
.0
.2






.006
. 100
. 100
.45
.44
.43
.066
.00
.37
0.44

<0.01
0.21

0.040
0

0
0

0
:s2 o
5
.05 <0
.12 0
0
.030 0
.63
.2
.01
. 15
...780
.030
	 < o_om 	 < o- ona -_ _
-------
                                         Tabla V-79  (Continued)

                                    NICKEL-COBALT MOLTEN SALT RINSE
                                      RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
a\
Ui
00
           Pol Tutant

Nonconventional Pollutants (Continued)


Magnesium



Manganese



Mo 1ybdenum



Phenolics


Phosphate



Sodi um



Sulfate



Tin
Stream
Code
D-9
E-5
F-6
D-9
E-5
F-6
D-9
E-5
F-6
E-5
F-6
D-9
E-5
F-6
D-9
E-5
F-6
D-9
E-5
F-6
D-9
E-5
F-6
Sample
Type
6
1
3
6
1
3
6
1
3
1
1
6
1
3
6
1
3
6
1
3
6
1
3
Concentrations (ma/1)
Source
24
15
12
0
0
0
0
<0
<0
0
<0
<4
16
<4
9
33
154
53
170
130
<0
<0
<0

.8
.7
.012
.140
.080
.030
.200
.200
.014
.005



.5 1
.0
.0
3


.12
.200
.200
Day 1
18

4.20
1 .2

0.100
23

<0.200

0.012
14

<4
,400 1

380
,700 3,

100
3.1

<0.200
Day 2 Day 3
13

3.
1 .

0.
25

0.

0.
<4

<4
,700

380
800

98
1 .

<0.
12
<0
01 1
1 0
<0
050 0
16
15
260 0
0
012 <0
<4
<4
<4
.1 ,000
9,400
880
2,900
3,800
120
9 2
<0
200 <0

. 100
.19
.99
.010
.230

.5
.380
.053
.005









.7
.200
.200

-------
                                         Table V-79  (Continued)
                                    NICKEL-COBALT MOLTEN SALT RINSE
                                      RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
Ul
vc
                Pol 1utant
    Nonconvent iona'l  Pollutants  (Continued)
    Ti tani urn
    Total Dissolved  Solids  (TDS)
    Total Organic  Carbon  (TOC)
    Total  Solids  (TS)
    V/anadium
    Yttrium
    Conventional  Pollutants
    Oi1 and Grease
    Total Suspended  Solids  (TSS)
    pH (standard un.its)
Stream
Code
ued)
D-9
E-5
F-6
• D-9
E-5
F-6
D-9
E-5
""F-B" ~~"
D-9
E-5
F-6
D-9
E-5
F-6
D-9
E-5
F-6
D-9
E-5
F-6
D-9
E-5
	 F-6 	
D-9
E-5
F-6
Sampl e
Type
6
1
3
6
1
3
6
1
~3
6
1
3 .
6" -
1
3
6
1
3
1
1
1
6
1
"3" 	
" 6
1
3
Concentrations (mg/1)
Source
<0.
<0.
<0.
393
330
320
8
<1
2
395
380
330
0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<1
<1
<1
<1
29
22
7.
6.
6.
005
0.20
020
7

1



y

1
016
010
010
002
020
020






14
71
64
Day 1
2.0

0.040
,700 8

,100 1
42

2.0
,000 . 10

,200 1
0.46

0.020
0.010

<0.020
38

7.0
790

80"
10.40

10.19
Day 2
0.61

0.020
,350 6
230
,100 2
42

<1
, 000 7
230
,020 2
0.59

0.030
0.01 1

<0.020
4

3
' 770
4
39
1 1 .80

10.70
Da
1 .
0.
0.
,000
,000
,700
29
7.
<1
, 100
,000
,800
0.
1 .'
0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<1
<1
<1
550
,200
21
1 1 .
12.
1 1 .
y 3
6
360
070




2 -




36
88
050
002
020
020






50
84
60

-------
                                    Tabla y-79  (Contlnuoci)


                               NICKEL-COBALT MOLTEN SALT RINSE

                                 RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
1.  No analyses were performed on the following toxic pollutants:  1-113, 116, and 129.


2.  Note that stream code Y-6 also appears on the titanium molten salt rinsewater raw
    wastewater sampling data table.  The wastewater is derived from an operation in both

    subcategories.
o\
a\
o

-------
                         i  Table V-80

        NICKEL-COBALT SAWJENG OR GRINDING SPENT EMULSIONS
               Water Use*?
 Plant     L/kkg     gal/ton
1
2
3*
4
5
5
6
7
8
9
10
9
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
17
21
NR
NR
NR
38.37
39.53
164.2
1,960
2,480
476,600
500,400
NR
NR
0.00
97.64
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
, NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
9.
9.
39.
470
594
114,300
120,000
NR
NR
0.
23.
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR



20
48
38






00
42











Average 122,700
29,430
             Percent
             Recycle

             100
             100
              NR
             100
             100
             100
              99.9
             100
             100
              NR
              NR
              NR
             <99.9
               0.0
              NR
              NR
              NR
              NR
              NR
              NR
              NR
             100
              NR
              NR
              NR
    Wastewater
   Discharge***
L/kkg     gal/ton
 0.00
 0.00
 0.00
 0.00
 0.00
 o.oo;
 0.00
 0.00
 0.00
 4.29
11.60
16.26
67.25
97.64
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR   :
NR
NR
NR
NR   :
NR   i
NR

39.41
 0.00
 0.00
 0.00
 0.00
 0.00
 0.00
 0.00
 0.00
 0.00
 1.03
 2.78
 3.90
16.13
23.42
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR

 9.45
NR - Data not reported
                         i
  *Nickel forming no longjer performed at this plant.
 **Application rate.     j                          ,
***Volume of spent lubricant generated per mass of :nickel-cobalt,
                               661

-------
                                               Table V-81

                           NICKEL-COBALT SAWING OR GRINDING SPENT EMULSIONS
                                     RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
               Pollutant

     jx \c Pa I lutants

      1.  acenaphthene
                                           Stream
                                            Code
Concentrations (mg/1)
          benzene
to
          1 , 1 , 1-trichloroethane
D-5
D-16
D-17
D-18
F-20
F-22
F-23
F-24
F-25
F-26
D-5
D-16
D-17
D-18
F-20
F-22
F-23
F-24
F-25
F-26
D-5
D-16
D-17
D-18
F-20
F-22
F-23
F-24
F-25
F-26
1
1
1
'I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
' 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Source
NO
NO
ND
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.009
^. 009
0". 009
0.009
0.014
0.014
0.014
0.014
0.014
0.014
Day 1

ND



ND
ND
ND
ND


0.026



ND
0.003
ND
ND


0.001



0.034
0.012
ND
ND

Day 2 Day 3
ND

ND
1 .450
ND




ND
ND

ND
ND
ND




ND
0.019

0.029
0.030
ND




ND

-------
              Table.V-81  (Continued)

NICKEL-COBALT SAWING OR GRINDING SPENT EMULSIONS
          RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
Stream
Pol lutant Code
luxic Pollutants (Continued)
13. 1 , l-dichloroethane D-5
D-16
D-17
D-18
F-20
F-22
F-23
F-24
" " F-25 -
F-26
O\ J'i . p-chl oro-m-cresol D-5
Q\ D-16
W D-17
- D-18
F-20
F-22
F-23
F-24
F-25
F-26
Sample Concentrations (mg/1)
Type Source

1 ND
1 ND
1 ND
1 ND
1 ND
1 ND
1 ND
1. ND
1 ' ' ' ND
1 . ND
1 ND
1 ND
1 , ND
1 ND
1 ND
1 ND
1 ND
1 ND
1 ND
1 ND
Day 1


ND



0.015
ND
ND
- NCT 	


0.116



.ND
ND
ND
ND

Day 2 Day 3

0.007

ND
ND
ND




ND
ND

ND
ND
ND




ND

-------
I
                                                      Table  V-81   (Continued)

                                         NICKEL-COBALT SAWING OR GRINDING SPENT EMULSIONS
                                                   RAW WASTEWATER  SAMPLING DATA
                             Pollutant

                  Toxic Pollutants  (Continued)

                   23.  chloroform
Stream
 Code
                        2,4-dimethy I phenol
              a\
              a\
                   37.   1 , 2-cliphenyThydrazine
                   39.   fluoranthene
D-5
D-16
D-17
D-18
F-20
F-22
F-23
F-24
F-25
F-26
D-5
D-16
D-17
D-18
F-20
F-22
F-23
F-24
F-25
F-26
D-5
D-16
D-17
D-18
F-20
F-22
F-23
F-24
F-25
F-26
D-5
D-16
D-17
D-18
F-20
F-22
F-23
F-24
F-25
F-26
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0.144
0.144
0. 144
0.144
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND

ND



ND
ND
ND
ND

	Concentrations (mg/1)
Source    Day 1    Day 2
                                                                                                 ND

                                                                                                 NO
                                                                                                 ND
                                                                                                 ND
                                        ND

                                        ND

                                        ND
                                        ND
                                        ND
                                        ND

                                        ND

                                        ND
                                        ND
                                        ND
                                        ND

                                        ND

                                        ND
                                       3.850
                                        NO
                                                                                                 ND
  ND
  ND
  NO
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND

  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND

  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
                                                                                       0. 168
                                                                                        ND
                                                                                       0. 105
                                                                                        ND
                                                                                        ND
                                                                                        ND
                                                                                        ND
                                                                                       0.009
                                                                                        ND
                                                                                       • ND
                                                                                        ND
                                                                                        ND
                                                                                        ND
                                                                                        ND
                                                                                        ND

-------
                                           Table  V-81   (Continued)

                            NICKEL-COBALT  SAWING OR GRINDING SPENT EMULSIONS
                                       RAW  WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
                Pollutant
     I Of. 1 c Poll utant's (Continued)
                                       Stream
                                        Code
                                                                     Concentrations  (mg/1)
                                                                 Source
      4-4.  methylene chloride
!i..   naphtha 1 ene
      57.   2-nitrophenol
D-5
D-16
D-17
D-18
F-20
F-22
F-23
F-24
F-25
F-26
D-5
D-16
.0-17
D-18
F-20
F-22
F-23
F-24
F-25
F-26
D-5
D-16
D-17
D-18
F-20
F-22
F-23
F-24
F-25
F-26 .
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
"' 1
. 1
1
1.
1.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
- 1
1 '
1
1
1
1
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.002
.0^002—
0.002
0.002
0,002
0.002
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
ND
ND
ND
ND
. ND 	
ND
ND
ND
.ND
ND

0.017



— .0^006--
0.003
1.210
0. 133


0.027



ND
ND
ND
1.240


0. 105



ND
ND
ND
ND

                                                                                    0.001

                                                                                     ND
                                                                                     ND
                                                                                    1.110
                                                                                    0.039
                                                                               ND

                                                                               ND
                                                                               ND
                                                                               ND
                                                                               ND

                                                                               ND

                                                                               ND
                                                                               ND
                                                                              - ND
                                                                                     ND

-------
                                          Table V-81  (Continued)
                            NICKEL-COBALT SAWING OR GRINDING SPENT EMULSIONS

                                      RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
                Pollutant


     Io*ic  Pollutants  (Continued)



      58.   4-nitrophenol
      bu .   4,6  dini tro.-o-cresol
cr>
o>
a\
      64.   pentachlorophenol
                                            Stream
                                             Code
D-5
D-16
D-17
D-18
F-20
F-22
F-23
F-24
F-25
F-26
D-5
D-16
D-17
D-18
F-20
F-22
F-23
F-24
F-25
F-26
D-5
D-16
D-17
D-18
F-20
F-22
F-23
F-24
F-25
F-26
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Concentrations (mg/1)
Source
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Day 1

0.446



ND
ND
ND
ND


0.593



ND
ND
ND
ND


ND



ND
ND
ND
145 .

Day 2 Day 3
ND

ND
ND
ND




ND
ND

ND
ND
ND




ND
ND

ND
ND
1 .950




ND

-------
              Table V-81  (Continued)

NICKEL-COBALT SAWING-OR GRINDING SPENT EMULSIONS'
          RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
Stream
Pol lutant Code
Toxic Pollutants (Continued)
65. phenol D-5
O-16
D-17
D-18
F-20
F-22
F-23
F-24 '
.--•.--.. .. _ F-25 .
F-26
h6 bis(2-eth-y Ihexyl ) phthalate D-5
. . D-16
0> D'17
£ D-18
>j F-20
F-22
F-23
F-24
F-25
F-26
-68. di-n-butyl phthalate D-5
D-16
D-17
D-18
F-20
F-22
' F-23
F-24
F-25
• F-26
69. di-n-octyl phthalate D-5
D-16
D-17
D-18
F-20
F-22
F-23
F-24
F-25
F-26
Sample Concentrations (mg/1)
Type - Source

1 ND
1 ND
1 ' .ND .'.
1 ND
1 ND
1 ND
1 ND
1 ND
1 -ND
1 ND
1 0.009 .
1 . 0.009
1 0.009
1 0.009
1 ND
1 ND
1 ND
1 ND
1 - ND
1 ND
1 ND
1 • ND
1 ' ND
1 ND
1 ND
1 ND
1. ND
1 ND
1 ND
1 ND
1 ND
1 ND
1 - ND
1 ND
1 ND
•1 - ND .
1 ND
1 ND
1 ND
1 ND
Day 1


ND



ND
0. 195
ND
ND


ND



ND
0.007
ND
0.381


ND '



ND
0.004
ND
ND..


ND



ND
ND
ND
ND

Day 2 Day 3

ND

0.547 ..,'.... . .. "
ND .
0.090 . .




ND
0.010

ND
ND
0.015




ND
ND

ND
ND
ND




ND ......
ND

ND
ND
0.001




ND

-------
                                          Tabla V-81  (Continued)
                            NICKEL-COBALT SAWING OR GRINDING SPENT EMULSIONS
                                      RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
1 ti K 1
                Pol lutant


           Po 1 I u t an t s (Continued)
      77.   acenaphthy lene
      HII .   ft uorene
a\
a\
09
      81.   phenanthrene
      84.   pyrene
                                       Stream
                                         Code
D-5
D-16
D-17
D-18
F-20
F-22
F-23
F-24
F-25
F-26
D-5
D-16
D-17
D-18
F-20
F-22
F-23
F-24
F-25
F-26
D-5
D-16
D-17
D-18
F-20.,
F-22
F-23
F-24
F-25
F-26
D-5
D-16
D-17
D-18
F-20
F-22
F-23
F-24
F-25
F-26
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
                                                                    Concentrations  (n»g/l)
Source
NO
NO
NO
ND
NO
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND '
ND
ND
Day 1

0.007



ND
ND
ND
ND


ND



ND
ND
ND
ND


0.002



ND
ND
8.550
0.354


ND



ND
ND
ND
ND

Day 2 Day :
ND

ND
ND
ND




ND
ND

ND
1 .730
ND




ND
ND

0.804
7.420
0.286




ND
ND

ND
1 .800
ND




ND

-------
             Table V-81  (Continued)

NICKEL-COBALT SAWING OR GRINDING SPENT EMULSIONS
         RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
Stream Sample
Pollutant Code Type
Toxic Pollutants (Continued)
114. -antimony D-5 1
D-16 1
D-17 1
D-18 1
F-20 1
F-22 1
- ':. . . • : _. _ •. . . F-23- : .1
F-24 1
F-25 1
: - F-26 1
--••:" Y-7 1
CT> Y-8 1
o>
115. arseni c D-5 1
D-16 1
D-17 1
D-18 1
F-20 1
F-22 1
F-23 1
F-24 1
F-25 1
F-26 1
Y-7 . 1
Y-8 1
117. beryli i urn D-5 1
D-16 1
D-17 1
D-18 . 1
F-20 1
F-22 1
F-23 1
. F-24 1
F-25 1
F-26 1
, Y-7 1
Y-8 ' 1
Concentrations (mg/1)
Source

<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
0
0

<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
0
0
<0
<0
" <0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0

.003
.003
.003
.003
.002
.002
.002
.002
.002
.002
.0002
.0002

.003
.003
.003
.003
.005
.005
.005
.005
.005
.005
.002
.002
.0005
.0005
.0005
.0005
.010
.010
.010
.010
.010
.010
.02
.02
Day 1


<0



0
0
0
0





<0



0
0
0
0




<0



<0
<0
<0
<0





.003



.002
.003
.006
.004





.003



.012
.023
.017
'.008




.0005



.010
.010
.010
.010



Day 2 Day 3

<0

<0
<0
<0




0



<0

<0
<0
0




<0


<0

<0
0
<0




<0



.003

.003
.003
.002




.003
0.0625
0.0022

.003

.003
.003
.007




.005
0.26
0.024
.0005

.0005 --•--•• 	 - •--
.001
.010




.010
<0.02
<0.02

-------
                                   Table V-81  (Continued)

                       NICKEL-COBALT SAWING OR GRINDING SPENT EMULSIONS
                                RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
           Pollutant
Tux ic Pollutants (Continued)
118.   cadmium
119.   chromium (total)
120.   copper
Stream
 Code
                                        D-5
                                        D-16
                                        D-17
                                        D-18
                                        F-20
                                        F-22
                                        F-23
                                        F-24
                                        F-25
                                        F-26
                                        Y-7
                                        Y-8
 D-5
 D-16
 D-17
 D-18
 F-20
 F-22
 F-23
 F-24
 F-25
 F-26
 Y-7
 Y-8

 D-5
 D-16
 D-17
 D-18
 F-20
 F-22
 F-23
 F-24
 F-25
 F-26
 Y-7
 Y-8
                                                               Concentrations (mg/1)
Source
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.03
<0.03
0.042
0.042
0.042
0.042
<0.100
<0. 100
<0.100
<0. 100
<0. 100
<0. 100
<0.02
<0.02
0.068
0.068
0.068
0.068
0.170
0. 170
0.170 -
0.170
0. 170
0.170
<0.02
<0.02
Day 1

0.066



<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050




2.5



<0. 100
24.0
11.2
<0. 100




0.28



0. 120
1 .20
16.5
1 .42



Day 2 Day 3
0.010

0.035
0.072
<0.050




<0.050
<0.03
<0.03
0.19

1 .9
1 .2
<0. 100




0.670
0.7
0.2
0. 10

0.26
0.76
0.790




0.390
0.5
0.4

-------
             Table V-81  (Continued)

NICKEL-COBALT SAWING OR GRINDING SPENT EMULSIONS
         RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
Stream
Pol 1 utant Code
Toxic Pollutants (Continued)
121. cyanide (total) F-20
F-22
F-23
F-24
F-25
F-26
Y-8
122. lead D-5
D-16
°\ D-17
Ij D-18
F-20
F-22
F-23
F-24
F-25
F-26
Y-7
Y-8
123. mercury D-5
D-16
D-17
D-18
F-20
F-22
F— 23
F-24
F-25
F-26
Y-7
Y-8
Sampl e
Concentrations (mg/1)
Type Source

1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
t \J
1 0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
i • 
-------
r
                                                       Table V-81   (Continued)

                                         NICKEL-COBALT SAWING OR GRINDING  SPENT  EMULSIONS
                                                   RAW WASTEWATER  SAMPLING DATA
                             Pollutant

                  Tuxlc Pollutants  (Continued)


                  124.  nickel
                   11.' b.  selenium
              NJ
                   1 26.  si 1ver
Stream
 Code
 D-5
 D-16
 D-17
 D-18
 F-20
 F-22
 F-23
 F-24
 F-25
 F-26
 Y-7
 V-8

 D-5
 D-16
 D-17
 0-18
 F-20
 F-22
 F-23
 F-24
 F-25
 F-26
 Y-7
 Y-B

 D-5
 D-16
 D-17
 D-18
 F-20
 F-22
 F-23
 F-24
 F-25"
 F-26
 Y-7
 Y-8
                                                                                  Concentrations  (mg/1)
Source
<0.003

-------
                                          Table V-81   (Continued)
                             NICKEL-COBALT SAWING OR GRINDING SPENT EMULSIONS
                                      RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
                 Pollutant
      Tux i c  Po11utants  (Continued)
      127.   thai Iium
0\
-J
00
      128
     Nonconventional  Pollutants

     Acidity
Stream
Code
D-5
D-16
D-17
D-18
F-20
F-22
F-23
F-24
F-25
— F — 26 	
Y-7
Y-8
D-5 '
D-16
D-17
D-18
F-20
F-22
F-23
F-24
F-25
F-26
Y-7
Y-8
D-5
D-1.6
- -D-17 	
D-18 •
F-20
F-22
F-23
- F-24
F-25
F-26 .
Y-7
Y-8
Samp] e
Type
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
T
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
- 	 1- -
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
                                                                     Concentrations (fng/1)
Source
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0

-------
                                    Table V-81  (Continued)
                       NICKEL-COBALT SAWING OR GRINDING SPENT EMULSIONS
                                RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
           Pollutant
                                       Stream
                                        Code
NOIH enventional Pollutants (Continued)
AlKalinity
A I umi nurn
D-5
0-16
D-17
D-18
F-20
F-22
F-23
F-24
F-25
F-26
Y-7
Y-8

D-5
D-16
D-17
D-18
F-20
F-22
F-23
F-24
F-25
F-26
Y-7
Y-8
                       Concentrations (mg/1)
Source
180
180
180
180
61
61 6
61
61
61
61
31 .0
31 .0
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
0.910
0.910
0.910
0.910
0.910
0.910
0.03
0.03
Day 1
1
550



,700
37
810
300




7.2



0. 150
12.4
2.53
0.260



Day 2 Day 3
,870

930
940
360




510
860.0
370.0
0.19

1 .6
19
0.760




0.740
12.0
1 .5

-------
             Table V-81  (Continued)

NICKEL-COBALT SAWING OR GRINDING SPENT EMULSIONS
         RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
Stream
Pol lutaht ' Code
Nunt onvent ional Pollutants (Continued)
Ammonia Nitrogen D-5
D-16
D-17
D-18
F-20
... . . . .F-22
" F-23
F-24
F-25
.F-26
'a\
•«j Hai i uifi ; D-5
Ul . , . D-16
D-17
D-18
F-20
• F-22
F-23
F-24
F-25
F-26
Y-7
Y-8
Boron D-5
D-16
D-17
D-18
' ' - " " 	 "" ' " . ' " . F-20
F-22
T-23
F-24
F-25
F-26
. Y-7
Y-8
Sampl e
Concentrations (mg/1]
Type Source

1 <1
1 • <1
1 <1
1 <1
1 0
1 0
1 .0
1 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
t <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 2
1 2



.04
_.04._
.04
.04
.04
.04
.12
.12
.12
. 12
.080
.080
.080
.080
.080
.080
.02
.02
.009
.009
.009
.009
. 100
. 100
. 100
. 100
. 100
.100
.2
.2
Day 1

5


0.
27
1 .
0,


0.



0.
0.
0.
0.




0.



0.
5.
1 .
0.







25

44
10


020



020
030
1 10
050




31



570
74
26
270



Day 2

7
0
0
<0




<0
0

0
0
<0




0


0

0
0
0




0



.8
.40
.91
.01




.01
.028

.006
.33
.010




.090


.023

.73
.19
. 130




.760


1
Day 3














,.




0.04
<0.02










9. 1
9.9

-------
                                         Table V-81  (Continued)

                            NICKEL-COBALT SAWING OR GRINDING SPENT EMULSIONS
                                     RAW WASTEWATEK SAMPLING DATA
                Pollutant
                                            Stream
                                             Code
                       Concentrations  (rag/1)
     Nuiicunveiitional  Pollutants (Continued)
     La 1 c. i UNI
     Chemical  Oxygen Demand (COD)
cr>
     Chloride
D-5
D-16
D-17
D-18
'F-2Q
F-22
F-23
F-24
F-25
F-26
Y-7
Y-8

D-5
D-16
D-17
D-18
F-20
F-22
F-23
F-24
F-25
F-26

D-5
D-16
D-17
D-18
F-20
F-22
F-23
F-24
F-25
F-26
Source
63
63
63
63
46.2
46.2
46.2
46.2
46.2
46.2
12.0
12.0
<5
<5 1 ,
<5
<5
<1
<1
<1
<1 230,
<1 2,
<1
34
34
34
34
12
12
12
12
12
12
Da

51



1.
2.
5.
35.




280



290
340
000
800


54



42
140
740
58

y 1 Day 2 Day 3
42

38
85
5.26
14
43
33
2
37 . 0
7.7
17.0
5,240

9,150
3,230
.34,000




17,000
52

190
160
95




47

-------
             .Table V-81  (Continued)

NICKEL-COBALT SAWING OR GRINDING SPENT EMULSIONS
         RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
Stream
Pollutant Code
Nonconvent i onal Pollutants (Continued)
Cobalt D-5
D-16
D-17
D-18
F-20
F-22
F-23
F-24
F-25
Y-7
Y-8
»j Fluoride . D-5
>J D-16
D-17
D-18
I F-20
F-22
F-23
F-24
F-25
F-26
Y-7
Y-8
Sample
Concentrations (mg/1)
Type Source

1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
	 ~ "'I <0"
1 <0
1 <0
1 0
1 • 0
1 0
1 ' 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
1 290
1 290

.006
.006
.006
.006
.100
.100
. 100
.100
.100
.TOO "
.03
.03
.45
.45
.45
.45
.43
.43
.43
.43
.43
.43
.0
.0
Day 1


0.067



<0. 100
1 .72
<0. 100
0.140



1 10



0.42
720
220
2.7



Day 2 Day 3

0

0
3
<0



_
0

0

1
2
1




2



.049

. 19
.3
.100




.T40 :
3.4
0.3
.47

.7
.2
.2




.0
100.0
10.0

-------
                                        Tabla V-31  (Continued)


                           NICKEL-COBALT SAWING OR GRINDING SPENT EMULSIONS
                                    RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
               Pol lutant


    Muneonventional  Pollutants (Continued)
    li on
                                           Stream
                                            Code
Ci
^J
00
    Manganese
	Concentrations (mg/1)
Source    P_ay_L    Day 2
D-5
D-16
0-17
D-18
F-20
F-22
F-23
F-24
F-25
F-26
V-7
Y-8
D-5
D-16
D-17
D-18
F-20
F-22
F-23
F-24
F-25
F-26
V-7
Y-8
D-5
D-16
D-17
D-18
F-20
F-22
F-23
F-24
F-25
F-26
Y-7
Y-8
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0.
0.
0.
0.
1 .
1 .
1 .
1 .
1 .
1 .
0.
0.
24
24
24
24
12.
12.
12.
12.
12.
12.
1 .
1 .
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
<0.
<0.
066
066
066
066
37
37
37
37
37
37
061
061




7
7
7
7
7
7
8
8
012
012
012
012
080
080
080
080
080
080
01
01

11



2
47
8
2




26



2
7
16
11




0



0
4
0
0








.12
.3
.46
.20








.53
.05
. 1
.8




.28



.080
. 10
.990
.400 -



30

1
1
1




94


21

64
22
2




.1 1


0

0
. 0
0




1




.9
.2
.66




.2






.07




.8


.52

.43
.93
.200




.25


                                                                                           1 1 .0
                                                                                            5.4
                                                                                            6.5
                                                                                            7.9
                                                                                            0.36
                                                                                            0.38

-------
             Table V-81  (Continued)

NICKEL-COBALT SAWING OR GRINDING SPENT EMULSIONS
         RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
Stream
Pol 1 utant Code
Nonconvent ional Pollutants (Continued)
Mo 1 y'bdenum D-5
D-16
D-17
D-18
F-20
F-22
F-23
F-24
F-25
F-26
. ; . - - - Y-7
Y-8
PheiiG 1 i cs F-20
"6\ " ' f~2l
^ F-23
VO F-24
F-25
F-26
Sample
T \J f") A

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
i
1
1
Concentrations (mg/1)
Source ~
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.030
<0.200
<0.200
<0.200
<0.200
<0.200
<0.200
0-056
0.056
•<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
uay i Day 2 Day 3

13



0.
5.
10.
0.




0.
0.
1 .
0.

0.95

22
30
<0.200
360
40
0
680
2.32

._.... 	 ... _- - g 2
52.0
0.14
009
83
42
1 1
0.023

-------
                                          Table V-81   (Continued)

                            NICKEL-COBALT SAWING OR  GRINDING SPENT EMULSIONS
                                      RAW WASTEWATER  SAMPLING DATA
                Pollutant

     Hmironyen11onal  Pollutants (Continued)


     1'lios.phate
                                             Stream
                                              Code
CTi
00
o
      Sulfate
	Concentrations  (mg/l)
Source    Day  1     Day  2
D-5
D-16
D-17
D-18
F-20
F-22
F-23
F-24
F-25
F-26
D-5
D-16
D-17
D-18
F-20
F-22
F-23
F-24
F-25
F-26
Y-7
Y-8
D-5
D-16
D-17
D-18
F-20
F-22
F-23
F-24
F-25
F-26
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
. 1
<4
<4
<4
<4
<4
<4
<4
<4
<4
<4
9.5
9.5
9.5
9.5
154
154
T54
154
154
154
14.0
14.0
53
53
53
53
130
130
130
130
130
130

<4



<4
10
<4
<4


290



3,050
16.5
328
130



95



66
140
6,400
150

<4

<4
<4
<4




<4
1 ,200

510
540
12.6




154
7,000.0
360.0
58

360
370
160




490

-------
                                           Table V-81   (Continued)
                             NICKEL-COBALT  SAWING OR GRINDING SPENT EMULSIONS
                                       RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
                 Pollutant
      NoiiLonvent i onal Po 1 1 utants  (Continued)
       in
cr>
00
      Total; Dissolved Solids (TDS)
Stream
Code
inued)
D-5
D-16
D-17
D-18
F-20
F-22
F-23
F-24
F-25 .
	 p^e —
Y-7
Y-8
D-5
D-16
D-17.
D-18
F-20
F-22
F-23
F-24
F-25
•F-26
Y-7
Y-8
D-5
D-16
D-17
D-18
F-20
	 -F-22"" "
F-23
F-24
F-25
F-26
Y-7
Y-8
Sampl e
Type

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
,f "
1
1
.1-
1
1
1
1
l
- ' 1
' 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
•••"• n ••" 	
i .
i
i
i
1
i

So

<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<1
<1
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
0
0
393
393
393
393
320
"3"2'0
320
320
320
' 320
120
120
Concentr
urce Da

. 12
.12 0.
. 12
. 12
.200
.200 <0.
.200 
-------
                                          Table V-81   (Continued)

                             NICKEL-COBALT SAWING OR GRINDING SPENT EMULSIONS
                                      RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
                 Po Mutant

      Hiiiii.unveritional  Pol lutants (Continued)

      Total  Organic Carbon (TOO
Stream
 Code
      lc,tal  Solids (TS)
09
N>
     Vanad i um
	Concentrations  (mg/1)
Source    Day 1     Day  2
D-5
D-16
D-17
D-18
F-20
F-22
F-23
F-24
F-25
F-26
D-5
D-16
D-17
D-18
F-20
F-22
F-23
F-24
F-25
F-26
Y-7
Y-8
D-5
D-16
D-17
D-18
F-20
F-22
F-23
F-24
F-25
F-26
Y-7
Y-8
1 8
1 8
1 8
1 8
1 2
1 2
1 2
1 2
1 2
1 2
1 395
1 395
1 395
1 395
1 330
1 330
1 330
1 330
1 330
1 330
1 120
1 120
1 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0







41



2



8
2
40
3

.0
.0
.016
.016
.016
.016
.010
.010
.010
.010
.010
.010
. 1
. 1

480



38
17
,000
280


,400



,400
,600
,000
,800




0



<0
<0
<0
<0



1 ,670

6,500
990
5,600




4,700
7,300

5,700
12,000
12,000




9,400


• o,
.060
0,
0.
0.
.010
.010
.010
.010
0.






















1 ,400.0
3,400.0
. 13

.025
.033
.020




.370
11.0
5. 1

-------
                                         Table V-81   (Continued)

                            NICKEL-COBALT SAWING OR GRINDING SPENT EMULSIONS
                                     RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
                Pol 1utant
                                            Stream
                                             Code
	Concentrations  (mg/1)
Source    Day 1     Day 2
     Npiiconventional  Pollutants (Continued)
Yttrium D-5
D-16
D-17
D-18
F-20
F-22
F-23
F-24
F-25
•"" 	 	 " ••' ••"" ." ' "~ '~ " 	 ' '~ ' 	 "F-26' ~
Y-7
Y-8
1 <0
1 <0
1 • <0
1 <0
1 ,<0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
— 1 - - - -<0
1 <0
1 <0
.002
.002
.002
.002
.020
.020
.020
.020
.020

<0.



<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.

002



020
020
020
020
<0

<0
<0
<0




.002

.002
.002
.020




f02X) " " "<0". ffZO 	 	 • "" " 	 "" ' 	 " ." ~ 	 " • "
. 1
. 1






<0. 1
<0. 1
CO   • unventional Pollutants
W          ~~
     0 i I  and Grease
     Total .Suspended Solids (TSS)
D-5 . 1
D-16 - 1
D-17 1
D-18 1
F-20 1
F-22 1
F-23 1
F-24 1
F-25 1
F-26 1
Y-7 1
Y-8 1
D-5 1
D-16 1
D-17 	 	 1 	
D-18 1
F-20 - 1
F-22 1
F-23 1
F-24 1
F-25 1
F-26 1
Y-7 1
Y-8 1
. <1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
1.0
1 .0
<1
<1
-• • <1
<1
22
22
22
22
22
22
54.0
54.0

3



120
7.5
660
3,200




46
- - - - 	


100
1 ,900
2,440
440



12

1 ,500
16,000
160




800


820

; 2 ,180
1 ,070
390




300












250.0
12,000.0


- -







360.0
1 ,100.0

-------
                                          Table  V-81   (Continued)

                             NICKEL-COBALT SAWING OR  GRINDING SPENT EMULSIONS
                                      RAW WASTEWATER  SAMPLING DATA
                 Pollutant

     t .iiiviiiitjimal  Pol lutants  (Continued)

     pi-i  (standard  units)
CD
*>.
                                             Stream
                                              Code
D-5
D-16
D-17
D-lB
F-20
F-22
F-23
F-24
F-25
F-26
Y-7
V-8
                   	Concentrations (mg/1)
                   Source    Day 1    Day 2
7. 14
7.14
7. 14
7. 14
6.64
6.64
6.64
6.64
6.64
6.64
6
6
                                                                           8.04
                                                                          10.33
                                                                           6.42
                                                                           7.64
                                                                           7.20
8.63

8.31
8.54
7.23
8.19
      1.   The following toxic pollutants were not detected in this waste stream:  2, 3, 5-10,  12,
          14-21,  24-33, 35,  36,  38,  40-43,  45-54, 56, 59, 61-63, 67, 70-76, 78, 79, 82, 83, and
          85-88.

      2.   Note that  stream codes Y-7 and Y-8 also appear on the titanium sawing or grinding spent
          emulsions  and synthetic coolants  raw wastewater sampling data table.  The wastewater is
          derived':from an operation  in both subcategories.
      a.   No  analyses v.ere performed on the following toxic pollutants:  89-113,  116, and  129.

-------
                          j Table V-82
                          1    .
             NICKEL-COBALT! SAWING OR GRINDING RINSE
 Plant

   i

Average
    Water Use
L/kkg     gal/ton
  NR

  NR
NR

NR
Percent
Recycle

 >0.0
                     Wastewater Discharge
                      L/kkg     gal/ton
1,814

1,814
434.9

434.9
NR - Data not reported
                              685


-------
Average
                           Table V-83
             NICKEL-COBALT STEAM CLEANING CONDENSATE
Plant
1*
2
Water
L/kkg
30.11
NR
Use
gal/ton
7.22
• NR
Percent
Recycle
0.0
0.0
Wastewater
L/kkg
30.11
NR
Discha
gal/to
7.22
NR
30.11
7.22
30.11
7.22
NR - Data not reported
*Nickel forming no longer performed at this plant.
                               686

-------
                          ;Table V-84               ;

           NICKEL-COBALT HYDROSTATIC TUBE TESTING AND
                  ULTRASONIC TESTING WASTEWATER
Water Use
Plant L/kkg gal/ton
1* 1,355 324.9
2 NR NRj
Average 1,355 324[9
!
i
|
i
1
j
1
1
: . f
[
Percent Wastewater Discharge
Recycle L/kkg gal/ton
0.0 1,355 324.9
NR NR ; NR
1,355 324.9
NR - Data not reported    |

*Nickel forming no longer performed at this plant,
                              687

-------
                           Table V-85

         NICKEL-COBALT DYE PENETRANT TESTING WASTEWATER
 Plant

   1
   2
   3
   4
   3
   3

Average
    Water Use
L/kkg     gal/ton
  40
 385
  NR
  NR
  NR
  NR

 213
 9.5
92.2
NR
NR
NR
NR

50.9
Percent
Recycle

  0.0
  0.0
 NR
  0.0
  0.0
 NR
                     Wastewater Discharge
                      L/kkg     gal/ton
 40
385
 NR
 NR
 NR
 NR

213
 9.5
92.2
NR
NR
NR
NR

50.9
NR - Data not reported
                              688

-------
                 Table V-86

NICKEL-COBALT DYE PENETRANT TESTING WASTEWATER
        RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
Pol 1 utant
. - Toxic Pollutants . . . . .
117. beryl 1 ium
118. cadmium
119. chromium (total)
120. copper
122 lead
124. nickel
O\ 128. zinc
00
MD
Nonconvent i onal Pollutants
A 1 uminum
Barium
Boron
Cal cium
Cobalt
Iron
Magnesium
Manganese
Molybdenum.
Sodium
Tin
Titanium
Stream
Code
BK-1
BK-1
BK-1
BK-1
BKi-1
BK-1
BK-1
BK-1.
BK-1
BK-1
BK-1
BK-1
BK-1
BK-1
BK-1
BK-1
BK-1
BK-1
BK-1
Sample Concentrations (mg/1)
Type Source Da
<0
<0
<0
<0
<5
<1
<0
- <1
<0
1
3
<0
1
0
0
<2
8
• - ' 1
<1
y 1 Day 2 Day 3
.100
.500
.300
.200
.000 ' -
.200
.200
.2
. 100
.8
.6
.400
.400
.300
.120
.000
.600
.700
.000

-------
                                            Tabla V-86 (Continued)

                                NICKEL-COBALT DYE PENETRANT TESTING WASTEWATER
                                        RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
                                              Stream
                                               Code
                  Po1 Iutant

       Nonconventional  Pollutants (Continued)

       Vanadium                               BK-1

       Yttrium                                BK-1
	Concentrations (mg/1)
Source    Day 1    Day 2



          <0.200

          <1.000
VO
O
       1.     No   analyses  were  performed  on  the  following
       pollutants:  1-116, 121, 123, 125-127 and 129.
                                                                   toxic

-------
! Table V-87
i
i
NICKEL-COBALT WET AIR POLLUTION
i
Water Use i Percent
Plant L/kkg gal/ton Recycle
|
1 NR NR 96.0
2 26.9 11)2 <100
3 8.30 1.99 0.0
4 25.59 6.14 0.0
5 , NR NjR 100
6 NR NR NR
7 571.0 13^7.0 25.0
8 488.2 117.1 0.0
9 46,940 11,260 98.0
10 NR NR 92.0
11 NR NR 100
12 NR NR >0.00
13 NR NR NR
i
Average 8,010 1,93:9
i
i
i
i
NR - Data not reported j
*Discharge to surface waters.
!
1
1
I
1
i
1
1 .
j
-j
1
i
1
t
i
1 691
CONTROL SLOWDOWN
Wastewater
Discharge*
L/kkg gal/ton
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
8.30 1.99
25.59 6.14
25.66 6.15
124.5 29.85
428.0 102.6
488.2 117.1
938.7 : 225.1
NR NR
NR NR
NR NR
NR : NR
291.3 69.85
!


•


' 1



-------
                                               Table V-8S

                           NICKEL-COBALT WET AIR POLLUTION CONTROL SLOWDOWN
                                      RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
a\
tvj
           Pollutant

Uix^iL. Pol lutants

114.   antimony


115.   arsenic


117.   beryllium


11H.   cadmium


1 ["•>   chromium (total)


i'.'D.   copper


i:'l.   cyanide (total)

}22.   lead


123.   mercury


124.   nickel


125.   selenium
Stream
Code
D-1 1
F-21
D-11
F-21
D-1 1
F-21
D-1 1
F-21
D-1 1
F-21
D-11
F-21
F-21
D-1 1
F-21
D-1 1
F-21
D-1 1
F-21
D-1 1
F-21
Sample
1
3
1
3
1
3 '
1
3
1
3
1
3
1
1
3
1
3
1
3
1
3 .
Concentrations (mg/1)
Source
<0 ."003
<0.002
<0.003
<0.005
<0.0005
<0.010
<0.002
<0.050
0.042
<0. 100
0.068
0.170
<0.02
<0.084
<0.100
<0.0002
<0.0020
<0.003
0.200
<0.003
<0.010
Day t
<0,003
<0.003
<0.0005
0.011
0. 14
<0.001

<0.084
<0.0002
0.86
<0.003
Day 2 Day 3
0.003
0.003
<0.020
<0.020
1 .75
2.85
<0.02
<0.200
<0.0020
20.0
<0.010

-------
             Table V-88 (Continued)

NICKEL-COBALT WET AIR POLLUTION CONTROL SLOWDOWN
          RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA

Pol 1 utant
Toxic Pollutants (Continued)
1 26. si 1 ver
127. thallium
- • - -•• -rzrrr ~ ziner • • • 	 ~* ~ 	
Nui-u. unvent i ona.l Pol 1 utants
CT> A <_• i d i t y
VO
U)
A 1 k a 1 i n i t y
A 1 unii num
Ammonia Nitrogen
Bari iim
Boron
Calcium
••- - •• - .-• . • Chemical Oxygen Demand
Chloride
Stream
Code

D-11
F-21
D-1 1
F-21
F-21 -

D-1 1
F-21
D-1 1
F-21
D-1 1
D-1 1
F-21
D-1 1
D-11
D-1 1
	 : -D-1-1— - ~
F-21
D-1 1
. F-21
Sampl e
Type

1
3
1
3
3

1
3
1
3
1
1
3
1
1
1
- -- -.1 --- -
3
1
3
Concentrations (mg/1)
Source Day 1 Day 2 Day 3

<0.001 <0.001
<0.002 <0.002
<0.003 <0.003
<0.005 <0.002
<0.050 0.060

<1 120 .
180 <1
61 47
<0.050 5.8
0.04 0.39
0.12 0.22
<0.009 16
63 29
	 <5 	 <5 -,--.- .- - .
<1 44
34 41
12 55

-------
                                           Table V-88  (Continued)
      i- l uui iile
      I I III!
                             NICKEL-COBALT WET AIR POLLUTION CONTROL SLOWDOWN
                                        RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
                 Pol lutant

                ional Pollutants   (Continued)
O\
      ''.*
-------
             Table V-88  (Continued)

NICKEL-COBALT WET AIR POLLUTION CONTROL SLOWDOWN
          RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
Pol 1 utant
Nniicunvent ional Pollutants (Continued)
hul fate
r i n
Ti tani urn
Total Dissolved Solids (TDS)
"lotal Organic Carbon (TOO
O I ot.a 1 Sol ids (TS)
vo
cn
vanadium
Y 1 1 1 i um '
Conventional Pollutants
Oi 1 and Grease
Total Suspended Solids (TSS)
pH (standard units)
Stream
Code
D-1 1
F-21
D-11
D-1 1 '
D-1 1
F--2-1
D-11
F-21
D-1 1
F-21
D-11
D-1 1
D-1 1
F-21
D-1 1
F-21
D-1 1
F-21
Sampl e
1
3
1
1
1
3
1
3
1
3
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
3
Concentrations (mg/1)
Source
53
130
<0. 12
<0.005
393
- 320
8
2
395
330
0.016
<0.002
<1
<1
<1
22
7.14
6.64
Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
41
94
<0.12
0. 1 1
780
230
13
<1
860
460
0.016
0.003
<1
1 1
15
190
2.63
7.47

-------
                                      Table V-88  (Continued)

                         NICKEL-COBALT WET AIR POLLUTION CONTROL SLOWDOWN
                                   RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA


   1.  No analyses were performed on the following toxic pollutants:  1-113, 116, and 129.

   2.  Note that stream code V-5 also appears on the titanium wet air pollution control
      blowdown raw wastewater sampling data table.  The wastewater is derived from an
      operation in both subcategories.
0\
ID

-------
                         I  Table V-89
                         f

               NICKEL-COBALT ELECTROCOATING RINSE
                         !                          '


               Water Use j        Percent     Wastewater Discharge
 Plant     L/kkg     gal/ton     Recycle      L/kkg     gal/ton
                         i            _              :

   1      3,367        807.4       0.0     3,367        807.4


Average   3,367        807-4               3,367        807.4
                               697

-------
Average
                           Table V-90



             PRECIOUS METALS ROLLING SPENT  NEAT  OILS
Plant
1
2
Water Use
L/kkg gal/ton
NR NR
NR NR
Percent
Recycle
NR
100
Wastewater Discha
L/kkg gal/to
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
NR
NR
0.00
0.00
NR - Data not reported
                               698

-------
                           Table V-91
             PRECIOUS METALS ROLLING SPENT EMULSIONS

Plant
1
2

3
4
4
5
Water
L/kkg
NR
NR

' NR
' 67.6
NR
NR •
Use ;
gal/ton
NR
NR
1
NR
16.2
NR
NR
Percent
Recycle
P
P

P
NR
P
P
Wastewater
L/kkg
25.00
46.47

160.1 :
NR
NR
NR
Discharge
gal/ton
6.00
11.14

38.40
NR
NR
NR
Average
67.60 •
16.20
77.20
18.51
 P - Periodic discharge
NR -r- Data not reported
                                699

-------
                                                 Table V-82
                                  PRECIOUS METALS ROLLING SPENT EMULSIOHS
                                       RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
O
o
            Pollutant


 Toxic  Pollutants


   4.   benzene


  11.   1,1,1-trichloroethane


  44.   methylene  chloride


  87.   trichloroethy1ene


 114.   antimony


 115.   arsenic


'117.   beryl 1i urn


 118,   cadtni uui


 119.   chromium  (total)


 120.   copper


 121.   cyanide (total)


 122.   lead


 123.   mercury
Stream
Code
1-5
1-5
1-5
1-5
1-5
1-5
1-5
1-5
1-5
1-5
1-5
1-5
1-5
Sample Concent rat
Type Source Day
1 ND
1 .0.022
1 0.003
1 ND
1 <0.010
1 <0.010
1 <0.005
1 <0.020
1 <0.020
1 0.200
1 <0.02
1 <0.050
1 <0.0002
ions (nig/ 1 )
1 Day 2 Day 3
0.319
ND
1 .330
1 .380
<0.010
<0.010
<0.050
<0.200
<0.200
25.0
<0.02
1 .00
0.0006

-------
         Table V-92  (Continued)

PRECIOUS METALS ROLLING .SPENT EMULSIONS
     RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
Stream . Sample
Concentrations Cmg/ 1)
Pollutant Code Type Source Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
Toxic Pollutants (Continued)
124. nickel 1-5 1 <0
125. selenium 1-5 1 <0
126. silver 1-5 1 <0
127. thallium 1-5 1 <0
128. zinc . 1-5 " 1 0
Nonconvent i ona Pollutants
Acidi ty ' . 1-5 - . 1 <1
,j • Alkalinity 1-5 1 40
O
H Aluminum ... i. . 1-5 , _ 1 <0
Ammonia Nitrogen . 1-5 1 0
Barium 1-5 1 <0
.050
.010
.010
.010
.040

. 100
.06
.050
1 .00
<0.010
0.130
<0.010
6.00
".' .>, -':
2 , 1 00
<1 .00
0.4
; <0.500 :

-------
                                           Table V-92  (Continued)

                                  PRECIOUS METALS ROLLING SPENT EMULSIONS
                                        RAW V/ASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
O
N>
Pol lutant
Stream
Code
Sample
Concentrations (mg/1)
Type Source Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
Nonconventional Pollutants (Continued)
Boron
Calcium
Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD)
Chloride
Cobalt
Fluoride
I ron
Magnesi urn
Manganese
Mo 1 ybdenum
Phenol i cs
1-5
1-5
1-5
1-5
1-5
1-5
1-5
1-5
1-5
1-5
1-5
1 <0
1 13
1 150
1 30
1 <0
1 0
1 0
1 2
1 0
1 <0
1 <0
.100
.8


.050
.32
.100
.70
.100
.050
.005
<1
7
900
42
<0
0
26
3
<0
<0
<0
.00
.00


.500
.29
.5
.00
.500
.500
.005

-------
         Table V-92  (Continued;

PRECIOUS METALS ROLLING SPENT EMULSIONS
      RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
Pol 1 utant
Nonconvent ional Pollutants (Continued)
Phosphate
Sodium
bu 1 fate
Tin
Ti tani um
Total Dissolved Solids (TDS)
Total Organic Carbon- (TOO
O Total Solids (TS)
U)
Stream
Code
1-5
1-5
1-5
1-5
1-5
1-5
1-5
1-5
Sample Concentrations (mg/1)
Type Source
1 2.7
1 28.0
1 740
1 <0.050
. . • J .. 	 	 <0...050 	
1 850
1 63
1 11,500
Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
570
585
8,500
<0.500
<0 500
32,000 A
43
33,000

-------
                                    Table V-92  (Continued)

                           PRECIOUS METALS ROLLING SPENT EMULSIONS
                                 RAW WASTEV/ATER SAMPLING DATA
           Pol lutant

Nonconventional  Pollutants (Continued)

Vanadium

Yttrium

Conventional Pollutants

Oi 1  and Grease

Total  Suspended Solids (TSS)

pH (standard units)
Stream
Code
1-5
1-5
1-5
1-5
1-5
Sample Concentrations (mg/L)
Type Source
1 <0.050
1 <0 . 050
1 <1
1 300
1 6. 10
Day 1 Day 2 Da
<0.500
<0.500
1,500
500
8.70 •
A - Sample would not evaporate at 180C.

1.  The following toxic pollutants were not detected in this waste stream:   1-3, 5-10,
    12-43, 45-86, and 88.

2.  No analyses were performed on the following toxic pollutants:  89-113, 116, and  129.

-------
                         •i Table V-93

             PRECIOUS METALS DRAWING SPENT  NEAT  OILS
 Plant

   1

Average
    Water Use .j
L/kkg     gal/ton
  NR

  NR
NR

NR
Percent
Recycle

 NR
                     Wastewater Discharge
                      L/kkg     gal/ton
0..00

0.00
0.00

0.00
NR - Data not reported
                               705

-------
                           Table V-94

             PRECIOUS METALS DRAWING SPENT EMULSIONS
Plant
1
1
2
3
4
5
5
6
2
3
7
8
Water
L/kkg
NR
NR
NR
35,500
NR
NR
NR
NR
148.4
NR
NR
NR
Use
gal/ton
NR
NR
NR
8,520
NR
NR
NR
NR
35.60
NR
NR
NR
Percent
Recycle
100
100
100
P
P
P
P
P
0.0
P
P
NR
Wastewater
L/kkg
0.00
0.00
0.00
9.47
14.77
32.90
38.63
141.8
142.4
NR
NR
NR
Discharge
gal/ton
0.00
0.00 '
0.00
2.27
3.54
7.89
9.26
33.99
34.15
NR
NR
NR
Average  17,820
4,278
63.32
15.18
 P - Periodic discharge
NR - Data not reported
                               706

-------
               Table V-95

PRECIOUS METALS DRAWING SPENT EMULSIONS
     RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
Pol lutant •
Toxic Pollutants
11. 1 , 1 , 1 -trichl oroethane
44. methylene chloride
114. ant imony
115. arseni c
117. bery 1 1 i um
1 187 ~C"a-dmTTim~ ' 	 	
119. chromium (total )
1 20 . copper
121. cyanide (total)
122. lead
123. mercury
124. n-ickel
1 25 . se 1 eni um
126.' silver
127. thallium
128. zinc
Nonconvent i onal- Pol 1 utants
Acidi ty
Alkal inity
Aluminum
Ammonia Nitrogen
Barium
Stream
Code
1-7
1-7
1-7
1-7
/
1-7
T "7
1 — /
1-7
1-7
1-7
1-7
1-7
1-7
1-7
1-7
1-7
1-7
1-7
1-7 '
1-7
1-7
1-7
Sample Concentrations (mg/1)
Type Source
1 0.022
1 0.003
1 <0.010
1 <0.010
1 <0.005
1 <0.020
1 0.200
1 <0.02
1 <0.050
1 <0.0002
1 <0.050
1 <0.010
1 <0.010
1 <0.010
1 0.040
1 <1
1 40
1 <0.100
1 0.06
1 <0.050
Day 2 Day 3 Day 4
3.040
0.879
<0.010
<0.010
<0.005
— <0'."Q~2'Q" ~ ~ '~ ~~ ------ - -- - - ~- - . - -- _ . . _ - 	 - _-
<0.020
46.4 .
<0 . 02
1.05
<0.0002
0.750
<0.010
: 0 . 090
<0.010
5.18

-------
         Tab)* V-95  (Continued)

PRECIOUS METALS DRAWING SPENT EMULSIONS
     RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
Pol lutant
Nonconventional Pollutants (Continued)
Boron
Cal cium
Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD)
Chloride
Cobal t
Fl uoride
^j Iron
O
00 Magnesium
Manganese
Mol ybdenum
Phenol ics ,
Phosphate
Sodium
Sulf ate
Tin
Ti tanium
Total Dissolved Solids (TDS)
Total Organic Carbon (TOC)
Total Solids (TS)
Vanadium
Yttrium
Stream
Code
1-7
1-7
1-7
1-7
1-7
1-7
1-7
1-7
1-7
1-7
1-7
1-7
1-7
1-7
1-7
1-7
1-7
1-7
1-7
1-7
1-7
Samp
Typi
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
le Concentrations (nig/1)
a Source
<0.100
13.8
150
30
<0.050
0.32
0. 100
2.70
<0.050
<0.050
<0.005
2.7
28.0
740
<0.050
<0.050
850
63
1 1 ,500
<0.050
<0.050
Day 2 Day 3 Day 4
0. 100
5.70
1 ,600
57
0.050
0. 14
7. 10
1.90 •
.0. 150
<0.050
<0.005
1 ,000
109
1 ,600
0.150
<0.050
420
18
1 ,430
<0.050
<0.050

-------
                                            Table  V-95   (Continued)

                                   PRECIOUS  METALS DRAWING  SPENT  EMULSIONS
                                        RAW  WASTEWATER  SAMPLING DATA
                 Pollutant

      Conventional  Pollutants.

      Oi1 and Grease

      Total Suspended  Solids (TSS)

      pH  (standard  units)
Stream
 Code
 1-7

 1-7

-1-7
Sample
 Type
                                                                      Concentrations  (mg/1)
                    Source
                              Day 2
                                       Day 3
  1       <1

  1      300

  1        6. 10
                                  33,000
                                                                                     8.20
                                      Day 4
-J
o
vo
      1 .  The following toxic pollutants were not detected  in this waste stream:   1-10,  12-43
          and 45-88.
      2.  No. analyses were performed on the following toxic pollutants:  89-113,  116,  and  129.

-------
                           Table V-96

          PRECIOUS METALS DRAWING SPENT SOAP SOLUTIONS
 Plant

   1
   2

Average
    Water Use
L/kkg     gal/ton
  NR
  NR

  NR
NR
NR

NR
Percent
Recycle

  P
 NR
                     Wastewater Discharge
                      L/kkg     gal/ton
 3.12
NR

 3.12
 0.748
NR

 0.748
 P - Periodic discharge
NR - Data not reported
                               710

-------
             ; Table V-97

PRECIOUS METALS' METAL POWDER PRODUCTION
        ATOMIZATION WASTEWATER

Plant

1
Average
Water Use ;
L/kkg gal/tpn
i
6,922 1,660,
6,922 1,660;
i
Percent Wastewater
Recycle L/kkg i

0.0 6,683 '• 1
6,683 1
Dis
gal

,603
,603
                  711

-------
                           Table V-98

              PRECIOUS METALS DIRECT CHILL CASTING
                      CONTACT COOLING WATER
Water Use
Plant
1
2
2
3
L/kkg
64,200
2,590
19,000
145,000
gal/ton
15,400
622.0
4,550
34,700
Percent
Recycle
100
0.0
0.0
NR
Wastewater Discharge
L/kkg
0.00
2,590
19,000
NR
gal/ton
0.00
622.0
4,550'
NR
Average  57,700     13,820
                                     10,800
2,590
NR
Data not reported
                              712

-------
                           ;Table V-99

                  PRECIOUS JMETALS SHOT CASTING
                      CONTACT COOLING WATER
 Plant
Average
     Water Use
 L/kkg     gal/ton
3,670

3,670
880.2

880.2
Percent
Recycle

  0.0
                      Wastewater Discharge
                       L/kkg    . gal/ton
3,670

3,670
880.2

880.2
                               713

-------
                                                 Table V-100
                            PRECIOUS METALS SHOT CASTING CONTACT COOLING WATER
                                       RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
#»
Toxic
11 .
44.
86.
87.
1 14.
115.
1 17.
118.
1 19.
120.
121 .
122.
123.
124.
125.
126.
127.
128.
Pol lutant
Pol lutants
1,1, 1-trichlo roe thane
methylene chloride
toluene
trichloroethy lene
ant imony
arsenic
beryl 1 ium
cadmium
chromium (total )
copper
cyanide (total )
1 ead
mercury
nickel
sel eniurn
si 1 ver
thai 1 ium
zi nc
Stream
Code
1-3
1-3
1-3
1-3
1-3
1-3
1-3
1-3
1-3
1-3
1-3
1-3
1-3
1-3
1-3
1-3
1-3
1-3
Samp 1 e
Concentrations (mg/1)
Type Source
1 0.022
1 0
1
1
1 .0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
.003
ND
ND
.010
.010
.005
.020
.020
.200
.02
.050
.0002
.050
.010
1 <0.010
1 <0.010
1 0
.040
Day 1
0.018
0
0
0
0
<0
<0
0
<0
0
<0
0
<0
<0
<0
0
<0
0
.004
.003
.002
.050
.010
.005
.040
.020
.600
.02
.050
.0002
.050
.010
.050
.010
.520
Day 2 Day 3



<0
<0
<0
9
<0
0
<0
<0
<0
0
<0
0
<0
5



.010
.010
.005
.88
.020
.500
.02
.050
.0002
.100
.010
.040
.010
.66
Nonconvent i onal Pollutants
Acidity
Al kal
i ni ty
Al urninum
1-3
1-3
1-3
1 <1
1 40
1 <0


. 100
<1
47
<0


. 100
<1
56
<0


. 100

-------
               Table V-100  (Continued)

PRECIOUS METALS SHOT CASTING CONTACT COOLING WATER
           RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA  .
Stream Sample Concentrations (mg/1)
Pol lutant
Nonconvent i onal Pollutants (Continued)
Ammonia Nitrogen
Barium
Boron
Cal c i urn
Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD)
Chloride
Cobalt
^j
l_i F 1 uoride
Ul
.. . .. - Iron, - -
Magn,esium
Manganese
Molybdenum
Phenolics
Phosphate
Sodium
Sulfate
Tin
Titanium
Total Dissolved Solids (TDS)
Total Organic Carbon (TOC)
Total Solids (TS)
Vanadium
Yttrium
Code
1-3
1-3
1-3
1-3
1-3
1-3
1-3
1-3
1-3
1-3
1-3.
1-3
1-3
1-3
1-3
1-3
1-3
1-3
1-3
1-3
1-3
1-3
1-3
Type Source
1 0.06
1 <0.050
1 <0.100
1 13.8
1 150
1 30
	 	 _i 	 !P_._P_5CL
1 0.32
1 0. 100
1 2.70
1 0.100
1 <0.050
1 <0.005
1 2.7
1 28.0
1 740
1 <0.050
1 <0.050
1 850
1 63
1 11,500
1 <0.050
1 <0.050
Day 1
0.04
<0.050
1 .70
11.1
35 1
28
_.._
-------
                                    Table V-100  (Continued)
                     PRECIOUS METALS SHOT CASTING CONTACT COOLING WATER
                                RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
           Pollutant

 •invi > it ion"! Pollutants

i)i 1  and Grca^d

Total Suspended Solids (TSS)

pH (standard units)
                                       Stream
                                        Code
1-3

1-3

1-3
Samp 1e
 Type
                                                               Concentrations (mg/1)
                   Source
         300

         -  6.10
                             Day 1
91

 6.34
         Day 2
                                     54
         6.70
Day 3
1.  The following toxic pollutants were not detected  in this waste stream:   1-10,  12-43,
    45-85, and 88.

2.  No analyses were performed on the following  toxic  pollutants:  89-113,  116,  and  129.

-------
                         :  Table V-101

               PRECIOUS METALS STATIONARY CASTING
                      CONTACT COOLING WATER
Plant

1
2
3
4
5
Water Use ;
L/kkg gal/ton
l
NR NR
NR NR
52,120 12,500
NR NR
NR NR
Percent
Recycle

100
P
99.8
NR
NR
Wastewater
L/kkg;
,
0.00
61.30
110.2 :
NR
NR
Discharge
gal/ton

0.00
14.70
26.43
NR
NR
Average  52,120
12,500
'85.76
20.57
 P - Periodic discharge
NR - Data not reported
                               717

-------
                           Table V-102

     PRECIOUS METALS SEMI-CONTINUOUS AND CONTINUOUS CASTING
                      CONTACT COOLING WATER-
 Plant

   1
   2
   3
   4
   5
       Water Use
   L/kkg     gal/ton
255,500
402,000
 10,349
     NR
     NR
61,270
96,400
 2,482
    NR
    NR
Percent
Recycle

100
100
  0.0
  0.0
 NR
Average 222,600     53,380
                        Wastewater Discharge
                          L/kkg     gal/ton
     0.00
     0.00
10,349
    NR
    NR

10,349
    0.00
    0.00
2,482
   NR
   NR

2,482
NR - Data not reported
                               718

-------
                                 Table V-103

PRECIOUS METALS SEMI-CONTINUOUS AND CONTINUOUS CASTING CONTACT COOLING WATER
                        RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA


Toxic
1 14.
115.
117.
118.
119.
'20.
121.
122.
M 123.
UD •
124.
125.
126.
127.
128.

Pol lutant
Pol 1 utants
ant imony
arsenic
bery 1 1 i um
cadmi um
chromium (total)
copper . .
cyanide (total )
lead
mercury
nickel
sel eni um
si 1 ver
thai 1 ium
zi nc
Stream
Code

1-2
1-2
1-2
1-2
1-2
.1-2 	
1-2
1-2
1-2
1-2
1-2
1-2
1-2
1-2
Sampl e
Type

2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2

Source

<0.010
<0.010
<0.005
<0.020
<0.020
0 . 200
<0.02
<0.050
<0.0002
<0.050
<0.010
<0.010
<0 . 0 1 0
0 . 040
Concentrations (mg/L)
Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4

<0.010
<0.010
<0.005
<0.020
<0.020
_0;100
0.50
<0.050
0.0002
<0.050
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.020

-------
                           Table V-103 (Continued)

PRECIOUS METALS SEMI-CONTINUOUS AND CONTINUOUS CASTING CONTACT COOLING WATER
                        RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
Pol lutant
Nonconventional Pollutants
Acidi ty
Alkalinity
Al umi num
Ammonia Nitrogen
Barium
Boron
Ca 1 cium
Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD)
Chi oride
Cobal t
Fl uoride
Iron
Magnesium
Manganese
Stream
Code
1-2
1-2
1-2
1-2
1-2
1-2
1-2
1-2
1-2
1-2
1-2
1-2
1-2
1-2
Sample
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2

Source
40
<0.100
0.06
<0.050
<0.100
13.8
150
30
<0.050
0.32
0.100
2.70
0.100
Concentrations (mg/L)
Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4
43
<0.100
0.13
<0.050
<0.100
11 .8
91
28
<0.050
0.32
0.200
2.40
0.100

-------
                                           Table V-103 (Continued)

                PRECIOUS METALS SEMI-CONTINUOUS AND CONTINUOUS CASTING CONTACT COOLING WATER
                                        RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
                                     Stream  Sample
Concentrations (mg/L)
Pol lutant
Nonconventional Pollutants
Mol ybdenum
Phenol i cs
Phosphate
Sodium
Sulfate
.TJO 	 	 	
Code
(Continued)
1-2
1-2
1-2
1-2
1-2
	 1-2
Type

2
1
2
2
2
.. 2
Source Day 1

<0.050
<0.005
2.7
28.0
740
<0.050
Day 2 Day 3 Day 4

<0.050
<0.005
1 .9
28.2
780
<0.050
NJ

-------
                                     Table V-103  (Continued)

           PRECIOUS METALS  SEMI-CONTINUOUS AND CONTINUOUS  CASTING CONTACT COOLING WATER
                                  RAW WASTEWATER  SAMPLING DATA
                                Stream   Sample
Concentrations (mg/L)
Pol lutant
Code
Typ
>e Source Day 1
Day 2 Day 3 Day 4
Nonconventional Pol lutants (Continued)
Titanium
Total Dissolved Solids (TDS)
Total Organic Carbon (TOC)
Total Solids (TS)
Vanadium
Yttrium
to
10 Conventional Pollutants
Oi 1 and Grease
Total Suspended Solids (TSS)
pH (standard units)
1-2
1-2
1-2
1-2
1-2
1-2
1-2
1-2
1-2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
<0.050
850
63
11 ,500
<0.050
<0.050

300
6. 10
<0.050
1 10
<1
110
<0.05
<0.050
6
43
6.50
1.   No analyses were performed on the following toxic pollutants:   1-113,  116,  and 129.

-------



Plant
1
2
3
4
4
2
1
5
5
4
4
2
2
2
6
7
8
9
10
11 .
PRECIOUS

Water
L/kkg
NR
4,170
NR
NR
658.7
.938.0
NR
1,377
2,616
3,065
4,170
9,260
9,380
147,000
69,830
NR
NR
18,200
NR
NR
CONT
Use
gai/t
Table V-104
METALS HEAT TREATMENT
ACT COOLING WATER :
Percent
on Recycle
NR 100
1,000' 100
NR 100
NR; P
158.0 0.0
225.0 0.0
NR P
330..2 0.0
627.4 0.0
735.0 0.0
1,000 0.0
2,2201 0.0
2,250 0.0
35,200 63.0
16,750 0.0
NR: , p
NR NR
4,360 NR
NR 0.0
NR NR
Wastewater
L/kkg '
0.00 !
0.00
0.00
1.01
658.8
938.0 i
1,318
1,377 ;
2,616 ;
3,065
4,170 1,
9,260 2,
9,380 2,
54,200 13,
69,830 16,
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
Discharge
gal/ton
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.24
158.0
225.0
316.1
330.2
627.4
735.0
000
220
250
000
750
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
Average  22,560
5,404
13,070
3,134
 P -.Periodic discharge
NR -.Data not reported
                              723

-------
                           Table V-105

          PRECIOUS METALS SURFACE TREATMENT SPENT BATHS
                  Plant
Wastewater Discharge
 L/kkg     gal/ton
1
2
1
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
10
12
13
14
5
15
16
17
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
, 7.59
54.03
139.5
182.9
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.82
12.96
33.45
•43.85
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
• NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
                 Average
 96.3
23.1
NR - Data not reported
                               724

-------
                           Table V-106

          PRECIOUS METALS >' SURFACE TREATMENT RINSEWATER
               Water Use '
 Plant     L/kkg     gal/ton
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
7
12-
13
14
15
16
13
17
123.00
231.40
;NR
1,390
5,365
NR
6,192
6,933
22,880
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
29.
55.
NR
333.
1,287
NR
. 1,485
1,663
5,488
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR:
NR
NR
NR.
NR
40
49

0















            Percent
            Recycle

              100
              0.0
               P
              0.0
              0.0
             CCR3
              0.0
              0.0
              0.0
             CCR2
              NR
              0.0
              NR
              NR
              P
              0.0
               P
              NR
              NR
   Wastewater Discharge
    L/kkg     gal/ton
Average   6,160
.1,477
     0.00
   231.40
   350.60
 1,390
 5,365
 5,920
 6,192
 6,933
22,880
60,630
    NR
    NR
    NR
    NR
   NR
    NR
    NR
    NR
    NR   :

12,210
     0.00
    55.49
    84.07
   333.0
 1,287
 1,420
 1,485
 1,663
 5,488
14,540
    NR
    NR
    NR
    NR
   NR
    NR
    NR
    NR
    NR

 2,928
 P - Periodic discharge  ;
NR - Data not reported   j

CCR2 - Two-stage countercurrent cascade rinse.     <
CCR3 - Two-stage countercurrent cascade rinse followed by a
       single stage rinse-.
                              725

-------
                                                   Table V-107

                                   PRECIOUS METALS SURFACE TREATMENT RINSE
                                         RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
to
           Pollutant

1 iif \i_ Pol lutants

i '-I.   ant imony


i ]'i    at ben ic


i I /    I   y I 1 i urn


I Hi    cadmi um


••j    chromium (total)


1 .''I.   copper


12\.   cyanide (total)


122.   lead


123.   mercury
Stream
Code
1-10
M-5
1-10
M-5
1-10
M-5
1-10
M-5
1-10
M-5
1-10
M-5
1-10
M-5
1-10
M-5
1-10
M-5
Samp 1 e
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
Concentrations (mg/L)
Source Da
<0.010
<0.010
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
.010
.010
.005
.005
.020
.020
.020
.020
.200
.050
.02
.02
.050
.050
.0002
.0002
y 1 Day 2 Day 3
<0.010 <0.010
<0.020
<0.010 <0
<0
<0.005 <0
<0
<0.020 <0
1 1
0.020 <0
<0
2.50 1
60
<0.02 <0
<0
0.100 <0
<1
<0.0002 <0
<0
.010
.010
.005
.005
.020
. 1
.020
.020
.80
.6
.02
.02
.050
.00
.0002
.0002
Day 4
<0.010
<0.010
<0.005
<0.020
<0.020
2.05
<0.02
0. 100
<0.0002

                                            Table V-107  (Continued)
                                   PRECIOUS METALS SURFACE TREATMENT RINSE
                                         RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
M
                 Pol lutant
         ic  Pollutants  (Continued)
      1?4.   nickel
      125.   selenium
      l^b.   silver
      1 il .   thai 1 ium
      i.'B.   zinc
      NOIH. on vent i onal  Pol 1 ut<*nts
      Acidity
      Al ka I ini ty
      Aluminum
Stream Samp!
Code Type
1-20
M-5
1-10
M-5
1-10
..-M=& 	
M-1 1
1-10
M-5
1-10
M-5
1-10
M-5
1-10
M-5
1-10
M-5
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
e
Concentrations (mg/L)
Source
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
	 <0
<0
<0
<0
0
<0
<1
40
100
<0
0
.050
.050
.010
.010
.010
,0-10 	
.0005
.010
.010
.040
.010


. 100
.200
Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
0.100 0.050
0.300
---.. <0.020 <0
• <0
.020
.010
<0.010 <0.010
. 	 . 	 	 6,. 70 	
0.714
<0.010 <0
<0
4.66 1
0
1,400 120
430
"' <1
0.100 <0
0
.010
.010
.84
.260


. 100
.300
Day 4
0. 100
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
2.32
470
^
0. 100

                                             Table V-107   (Continued)

                                   PRECIOUS METALS SURFACE TREATMENT RINSE
                                         RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
                Pollutant
     Hiiiii onvent ional Pol lutants  (Continued)

     Aniiii.jiiia Nitrogen
     tun on
     lalrUirn
              Oxygen  Demand  (COD)
00
     i.'nba 11
     >luuride
Code
inued)
1-10
M-5
I- 10
M-5
1-10
M-5
1-10
M-5
1-10
M-5
1-10
M-5
1-10
M-5
1-10
M-5
Type
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
Source Day 1 Day 2 Pay 3
0
<0
<0
<0
.<0
<0
13
36
150
<5
30
10
<0
<0
0
0
.06
.1
.050
.050
. 100
.100
.8
.5




.050
.050
.32
.85
0.2 0.04
0
<0.050 <0
<0
<0.100 <0
<0
14. 1 9
36
1,800 1,800
<5
18 28
<0
<0.050 <0
<0
0. 10 0
0
.2
.050
.050
.100
. 100
.10
.5



.•1
.050
.050
.07
.94
Day 4
0.21

<0

<0

13

100

28

<0

0


.050

. 100

.2





.050

.20


-------
          Table V-107  (Continued)

PRECIOUS METALS SURFACE TREATMENT RINSE
      RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
   Stream  Sample
Concentrations (mg/L)
Pol lutant Code
Nonc.orivent i onal Pollutants (Continued)
Icrtii 1-10
M-5
Magnesium 1-10
M-5
Manganese 1-10
M-5
Mil ! yhdenuni 1-1 0
M-5
I'lianol ics 1-10
M-5
•'nosphate I- 1 0
»j M"5
(O
VO ',1.11.11 um 1-10
M-5
~,u I fate 1-10
M-5
Tin 1-10
M-5
Type

2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
2
1

2
1
2
1
2
.1
So

0.
<0.
2.
1 1 .
0.
<0.

-------
          Tabla V-107  (Continued)

PRECIOUS METALS SURFACE TREATMENT RINSE
      RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
   Stream  Sample
                               Concentrations (mg/L)
Pol lutant
Code
Typi
s_ Source
Day 1 Day 2
Day 3
Day 4
Nonc-onvantional Pollutants (Continued)
1 i trtnium
Tutal Dissolved Solids (TDS)
lijtrii Organic Carbon (TOCJ
ititdi iolidt. (TS)
\ cii icid i uiii
•vj
OJ
O v i i r i urn
i.uiwentional Pollutants
u i i and Grease
1-10
M-5
1-10
M-5
1-10
M-5
1-10
M-5
1-10
M-5
1-10
M-5
1-10
M-5
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
<0.050
<0.050
850
270.0
63
<1
1 1 ,500
280.0
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<1
3.0
<0.050
900
57
4,000
<0.050
<0.050
4
<0.050
<0.050
950
510.0
28
10
930
800
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
3
<1
<0.050
360
<1
390
<0.050
<0.050
8

-------
                                           Table V-107   (Continued)

                                 PRECIOUS METALS SURFACE TREATMENT RINSE
                                       RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA


(


1


Pol lutant
.onvent i ona 1 Pollutants
fetal Suspended Solids

.il-l (standard units)

Stream
Code
(Continued).
(TSS) 1-10
M-5
1-10
M-5
Sampl e
Type

2
1
2 -
1

Sdurce

300
14.0
6.10
7.30
Concentrations (mg/L)
Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4

3,000 <1 11
310
1 .90 2.20 1 .30
2.50
        No analyses were performed on the following toxic pollutants:   1-V13,  116,  and 129.
U)

-------
                          Table V-108

          PRECIOUS METALS ALKALINE CLEANING SPENT BATHS
                  Plant

                    1
                    2
                    3
                    4
                    5
                    6
                    7
                    8

                Average
Wastewater Discharge
 L/kkg     gal/ton
 60.00
 NR
 NR
 NR
 NR
 NR
 NR
 NR

 60.00
14.40
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR

14.40
NR - Data not reported
                              732

-------
 Plant

   1
   2
  • 1
   1
   3
   4
   5
                           Table V-109
             PRECIOUS METALS ALKALINE CLEANING RINSE
      Water Use  ; .
  L/kkg     gal/ton
 3,149
 6,933
15,840
18,890
    NR
    NR
    NR
  755:.1
1,663
3,800
4,530
   NR
   NR
   NR;
Percent
Recycle

  0.0
  0.0
  0.0
  0.0
  NR
  NR
  NR
                        Wastewater Discharge
                         L/kkg     gal/ton
 3,149
 6,933
15,840
18,890
    NR
    NR
    NR
  755.1
1,663
3,800
4,530
   NR
   NR
   NR
Average  11,200.00   2,687.00
                                 11,200.00   2,687.00
NR - Data not reported
                               733

-------
                           Table V-110

                PRECIOUS METALS ALKALINE CLEANING
                      PREBONDING WASTEWATER
 Plant

   1
   2
   3
   4
   4
   5
   6
   7
      Water Use
  L/kkg     gal/ton
    10.20
93,800
   173.8
   873.7
 6,635
16,480
20,030
83,400
Average  27,680
     2.45
22,500
    41.67
   209.5
 1,591
 3,951
 4,804
20,000

 6,637
Percent
Recycle

  0.0
   P
  0.0
  0.0
  0.0
  NR
  0.0
  0.0
                         Wastewater Discharge
                          L/kkg     gal/ton
10. 20
2.45



6
16
20
83
126
173
873
,635
,480
,030
,400
.0
.8
.7







1,
3,
4,
20,
30
41
209
591
951
804
000
.20
.67
.5




                                 15,970
                     3,829
 P - Periodic discharge
NR - Data not reported
                               734

-------
                       Table V-111

PRECIOUS METALS ALKALINE CLEANING PREBONDING WASTEWATER
             RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
          Stream  Sample
Concentrations (mg/L)

Toxic
1 1 .
44.
45.
65.
66.
86.
87.
1 14.
115.
1 17.
1-18. --
1 19.
120.
Po1 1 utant
Pol 1 utants
1 , 1 , 1-trichloroethane
methylene chloride
methyl chloride
(ch)orome thane)
pheno 1
bis(2-ethy Ihexyl )
phtha 1 ate
tol uene
t ri ch 1 oroethy 1 ene
antimony
arseni c
beryl 1 i urn
cadmi urn
chromium (total)
copper
Code

1-9
K-4
1-9
K-4
1-9
K-4
1-9
K-4
1-9
K-4
1-9
K-4
1-9
K-4
1-8
1-9
K-4
1-8
1-9
K-4
1-8
1-9
K-4
-1.^8
1-9
K-4
1-8
1-9
.K-4
1-8
1-9
K-4
Type

1
1
1
1
1
1
2
6
2
6
1
1
1
1
2
2
6
2
2
6
2
2
6
2
2
6
2
2
6
2
2
6
Source

0.022
ND
'0.003
0.003
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.002
ND
ND
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0 . 020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
0.200
0.200
0. 100
Day 1 Day 2

0.008
0.010 0.011
0.012 '
0.133 0.006
0.070
ND . ND
ND
ND ND
ND
ND 0.005
ND
0.818 0.006
ND
ND ND
<0.020
<0.010
<0.010 <0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010 <0.010
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005 <0.005
-<0.020-'
0.420
0.120 0.080
<0.020
<0.020
0.140 0.200
2.25
0.600
4.95 5.95
Day 3

0.007
0.015
0.016
O.005
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.003
ND
ND
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
	 <0.020 ••
0.040
0.060
<0.020
<0.020
0. 180
0.750
2.55
3.80
Day 4

0.007
0.006
ND
0.001
ND
ND
0.025
<0.010
,<0.010
<0.005
0.060
<0.020
1 .25

-------
                                           Table V-111   (Continued)
                           PRECIOUS METALS ALKALINE CLEANING PREBONDING WASTEWATER
                                       RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
                                    Stream  Sample
Concentrations (mg/L)
0\
Pol lutant
Toxic Pol lutants (Continued)
121. cyanide (total)


122. lead


123. mercury


124. nickel


125. selenium


126. silver


127. thai 1 ium


128. zinc


Nonconvent ional Pollutants
Acidity


Alkal ini ty


Aluminum


Code

1-8
1-9
K-4
1-8
1-9
K-4
1-8
1-9
K-4
1-8
1-9
K-4
1-8
1-9
K-4
1-8
1-9
K-4
1-8
1-9
K-4
1-8
1-9
K-4

1-8
1-9
K-4
1-8
1-9
K-4
1-8
1-9
K-4
Type

1
1
1
2
2
6
2
1
6
2
2
6
2
2
6
2
2
6
2
2
6
2
2
6

2
2
6
2
2
6
2
2
6
Source

<0
<0
0

-------
                                             Table V-111   (Continued)

                            PRECIOUS METALS ALKALINE CLEANING PREBONDING WASTEWATER
                                         RAW WASTEWATER  SAMPLING DATA
                 Pol 1utant
Stream  Sample
 Code    Type
                                                        Source
                                                                  Concentrations (mg/L)
      Noneonvent i onal  Pol 1utants (Continued)
      Ammonia Nitrogen
      Bari um
      Boron
-J
US
      Calci um
      Chemical  Oxygen Demand (COD)
      Chloride
      Cobalt
      Fluori de
      Iron .
      Magnes i um
      Manganese
1-8
1-9
K-4
1-8
1-9
K-4
1-8
-I—9--
K-4
1-8
1-9
K-4
1-8
1-9
K-4
1-8
1-9
K-4
1-8
1-9
K-4
1-8
1-9
K-4
1-8
1-9
K-4
1-8
1-9
K-4
1-8
1-9
K-4
2
2
6
2
2
6
2
-" - 2
6
2
2
6
2
2
6
2
2
6
2
2
6
2
2
6
2
2 .
6
2
2
6
2
2
6
0.06
0.06
0.17
<0.050
' <0.050
<0.050
<0. 100
<0\ "100-
<0. 100
13.8
13.8
8.70
150
150
34
30
30
35
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
0.32
0.3:2
1.31
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
2. 10
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
                                                                  0.32
                                                                  1 .40
                                                                 <0.100
                           10.2
                                                                200
                                                                 55
                                                                 <0.050
                                                                  7.7
                                                                  4.75
                                                                  2.20
                                                                  0. 150
                                     0.08
                                     0. 1
                                     0.07
 0.04
 0.05
 0.07
                                    <0.050   <0.050
                                    <0.050   <0.050
                                     0.250    0.650

                                    22.1      9.70
                                    
-------
                 Table V-111  (Continued)

PRECIOUS METALS ALKALINE CLEANING PREBONDING WASTEWATER
             RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
Stream
Pol lutant Code
Nonconvent 1 ona 1 Pol lutants (Continued)
Molybdenum 1-8
1-9
K-4
Phenol ics 1-8
1-9
K-4
Phosphate 1-8
1-9
K-4
Sodium 1-8
1-9
ul
Sulfate 1-8
1-9
K-4
Tin 1-8
1-9
K-4
Titanium 1-8
1-9
K-4
Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) 1-8
1-9
K-4
Total Organic Carbon (TOC) 1-8
1-9
K-4
Total Solids (TS) 1-8
1-9
K-4
Vanadium 1-8
1-9
K-4
Sample
Type

2
2
6
1
1
1
2
2
6
2
2
6
2
2
6
2
2
6
2
2
6
2
2
6
2
2
6
2 1 1
2 1 1
6
2
2
6

Source

<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
2.7
2.7
4.8
28.0
28.0
32.9
740
740
400
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
850
850
140
63
63
<1
,500
,500
160
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
Concentrations
Day 1 Day.,!

<0.050
<0.050
<0.050 <0.050
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005 <0.005
35
16
100 100
436
37.1
50.3 53.8
1 ,500
300
410 630
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050 <0.050
<0.050
<0.050
0.450 <0.050
2,500
170
225 200
15
4
19 14
2,900
230
300 - 450
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050 <0.050
(mg/L)
Day 3

<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
15
30
58
77.1
35.4
60.3
450
480
840
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
0.150
650
1 ,850
240
17
18
22
680
1 ,900

<0.050
<0.050
<0,050

Day 4


<0.050


<0.005


18


30.2


630


<0.050


<0.050


1 16


5


130


<0.050


-------
UJ
                                             Table V-.11 1   (Continued)

                            PRECIOUS METALS ALKALINE CLEANING PREBONDING WASTEWATER
                                         RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
                                      Stream  Sample
Concentrations (mg/L)
Pol 1 utant
Nonconvent i onal Polluta
Yttrium


Conventional Pollutants
Oi 1 and Grease


Total Suspended Solids


pH (standard units)


Code
nts (Continued)
1-8
1-9
K-4

1-8
1-9
K-4 "
(TSS) 1-8.
1-9
K-4
1-8
1-9
K-4
Type

2
2
6

1
1
1
2
2
6
2
2
6
£

<0
<0
<0

<,
<1
"XT
300
300
16
6
6
6
ource

.050
.050
.050







. 10
. 10
.70
Day 1 Day 2

<0.050
<0.050
<0.050 <0'. 050

5
5 .
~T6 	 "TO 	
400
50
47 68
2.30
6.40
5.40 4.60
Day 3 Day 4

<0.050
<0.050 <0.050
<0.050

15 ;
<1 <1
- TO" •• - - 	 ;

-------
                           Table V-112

        PRECIOUS METALS TUMBLING OR BURNISHING WASTEWATER
 Plant

   1
   2
   1
   3
   4
      Water Use
  L/kkg     gal/ton
   992.6
 1,053
 5,745
40,700
    MR
Average  12,120
  238.0
  252.5
1,378
9,760
   NR

2,907
Percent
Recycle

  0.0
  0.0
  0.0
  0.0
  0.0
                        Wastewater Discharge
                         L/kkg     gal/ton
   992.6
 1,053
 5,745
40,700
    NR

12,120
  238.0
  252.5
1,378
9,760
   NR

2,907
NR - Data not reported
                               740

-------
                                          Table V-113
                      PRECIOUS METALS TUMBLING OR BURNISHING WASTEWATER
                                RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
           Pol 1utant

Toxic Pollutants

 11.  1,1,1-trichloroethane


 16.  chloroethane


 44.  methylene chloride


 49.  trichlorof1uoromethane


 86.  toluene


114.  ant imony


115.  arseni c


117.  beryl 1 i uin


118.  cadmium


119.  chromium (total)


120.  copper


121.  cyanide (total)


122.  lead


123.  mercury


124.  nickel
Stream
Code
1-4
K-3
1-4
K-3
1-4
K-3
1-4
. Kr3 _
1-4
K-3
1-4
K-3
1-4
K-3
1-4
K-3
1-4
K-3
1-4
K-3
1-4
K-3
1-4
K-3
1-4
K-3
1-4
K-3
1-4
K-3
Sample
Type
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
. ..!.._
1
1
2
6
2
6
2
6
2
6
2
6
2
6
1
1
2
6
2
6
2
6
Concentrations (mg/1)
Source
0.022
ND
ND
ND
0.003
0.003
ND
ND . ._
ND
0.002
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.005
<0.005
<0.020
<6.020
<0.020
<0.020
0.200
0.100
<0.02
0.09
<0.050
<0.050
<0.0002
<0.0002
<0.050
<0.050
Day 1
0.017
ND
0.001
ND
0.004
0.041
0.001
- ND
ND
0.028
0.050
<0.010
<0.020
<0.010
<0.005
<0.005
0.060
0.720
<0.020
3. 18
142
5.50
<0.02
<0.02
1.85
<0.050
<0.0002
0.0005
0. 100
1.35
Day 2
ND
ND
0.031
. ND .-:.-.
0.088
<0.010
<0.010
<0.005
0.700
0.500
5. 10
<0.02
<0.050
0.0004
3.25
Day 3
ND
ND
0.007
•ND-- --
0.005
<0.010
<0.010
<0.005
0.600
0. 120
6.25
0.08
<0 . 050
<0.0002
2. 10

-------
                                          Table V-113  (Continued)

                            PRECIOUS METALS TUMBLING OR BURNISHING WASTEWATER
                                      RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
10
           Pollutant

Toxic Pollutants (Continued)

125.  selenium


126.  silver


127.  thallium


128.  zinc



Nonconventional Pollutants

Acidity


Alkalinity


A1umi num


Ammonia Nitrogen


Bari um


Boron


Calcium


Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD)


Chioride


Cobalt
Stream
Code
1-4
K-3
1-4
K-3
1-4
K-3
1-4
K-3
1-4
K-3
1-4
K-3
1-4
K-3
1-4
K-3
1-4
K-3
1-4
K-3
1-4
K-3
1-4
K-3
1-4
K-3
1-4
K-3
Samp 1 e
Type
2
6
2
6
2
6
2
6
2
6
2
6
2
6
2
6
2
6
2
6
2
6
2
6
2
6
2
6
Concentrations (mg/1)
Source
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0 . 01 0
<0.010
<0.010
0.040
<0.020
<1
<1
40
43
<0.100
<0.100
0.06
0. 17
<0.050
<0.050
<0. 100
<0. 100
13.8
8.70
150
34
30
35
<0.050
<0.050
Day 1 Day 2
<0.010
<0.010 <0.010
0.070
0.080 0.220
<0.010
<0.010 <0.010
3.16
0.160 _0. 180
190
<1 <1
<1
130 120
0.400
0.300 0.300
0.03
0.09 0.08
<0.050
<0.050 <0.050
0.400
0.700 0.300
11.1
9.30 9.70
51
250 190
24
42 47
<0.050
<0.050 <0.050
Day 3
<0.010
0.080
<0.010
0.140
<1
96
0. 100
1 . 1
'<0.050
10.7
9.90
160
40
<0.050

-------
              Table V-113  (Continued)

PRECIOUS METALS TUMBLING OR BURNISHING WASTEWATER
          RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
Pol 1 utant
Stream
Code
Samp 1 e
Concentrations (mg/1)
Type Source
Day 1
Day 2 Day 3
Nonconvent ional Pollutants (Continued) • -
Fl uoride
Iron
Magnesium

Mo 1 ybdenum
Phenol i cs
Phosphate
Sodium
Sulfate
Tin
Ti tani urn
Total Dissolved Solids (TDS)
Total Organic Carbon (TOC)
Total Solids (TS)
1-4
K-3
1-4
K-3
1-4
K-3
K-3
1-4
K-3
1-4
K-3
1-4
K-3
1-4
K-3
1-4
K-3
1-4
K-3
1-4
1-4
K-3
1-4
K-3
1-4
K-3
2
6
2
" 6
2
6
	 ——2-—"
6
2
6
1
1
2
6
2
6
2
6
2
6
2
6
2
6
2
6
2
6
0
1
0
<0
2
2
	 -0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
2
4
28
32
740
400
<0
<0
<0
<0
850
140
63
1 1 ,500
160
.32
.31
. 100
.050
.70
. 10
.100-'
.050
.050
.050
.005
.005
.7 2
.8
.0
.9
8
.050
.050
.050
.050
9

10
0.25
1 .6
0
3
2
2
1
<0
<0
<0
<0
,800
130
371
89
,300
680
<0
<0
<0
<0
,700
290
27
49
,000
410
.750
.05
.40
.20
7T0tr
.05
.050
.050
.005
.005

.5

.050
.050
.050
.050



1.1 1.3
7.85 5.
2.10 2.
0.450 1.
<0.050 <0.
<0.005 <0,
110 130
58.2' 68,
600 760
<0.050 <0,
<0.050' <0.
280 280
46 57
410 380
,30
. 10
.00
.050
.005

.3

.050
.050




-------
                                    Table V-113  (Continued)

                      PRECIOUS METALS TUMBLING OR BURNISHING WASTEWATER
                                RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
Pol lutant
Nonconvent ional Pollutants (Continued)
Vanadium
Yttrium
Conventional Pollutants
Oi 1 and Grease
Total Suspended Solids (TSS)
pH (standard units)
Stream
Code
1-4
K-3
1-4
K-3
1-4
K-3
1-4
K-3
1-4
K-3
Sample
Type
2
6
2
6
1
1
2
6
2
6
Concentrations (mg/1)
Source
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<]
300
16
6.10
6.70
Day 1 Day 2
<0.050
<0.050 <0.050
<0.050
<0.050 <0.050
40 38
10
100 110
2.52
8.70 7.30
Day 3
<0.050
<0.050
.,
62
6.50
1.   The following toxic pollutants were not detected in this waste stream:   1-10,  12-15,
    17-43,  45-48, 50-85,  87,  and 88.

2.   No analyses were performed on the following toxic pollutants:   89-113,  116,  and 129.

-------
                          : Table V-114

       PRECIOUS METALS SAWING OR GRINDING SPENT NEAT OILS
 Plant

   1

Average
    Water Use  :
L/kkg     gal/tpn
  NR

  NR
NR

NR
Percent
Recycle

  100
                     Wastewater Discharge
                      L/kkg :    gal/ton
0.00

0.00
0.00

0.00
NR - Data not reported
                              745

-------
                           Table V-115

       PRECIOUS METALS SAWING OR GRINDING SPENT EMULSIONS
 Plant

   1
   1
   2
   2
     Water Use
 L/kkg     gal/ton
2,220
2,270
   NR
   NR
Average   2,245
533.0
545.0
 NR
 NR

539.0
Percent
Recycle

   P
   P
   P
   P
                      Wastewater Discharge
                       L/kkg     gal/ton
    3.17
    8.92
  177.6
2,775

  741.1
  0.76
  2.14
 42.60
665.4

177.7
 P - Periodic discharge
NR - Data not reported
                               746

-------
                     Table V-116

PRECIOUS METALS SAWING OR GRINDING SPENT EMULSIONS
           RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
Toxic
1 1 .
44.
65.
1 14.
115.
1 17..
1 18.
-J 119.
*»
~° 120.
121 .
122.
123.
124.
125.
126.
127.
128.
Pol lutant
Pol 1 utants
1 , 1 , 1-trichloroethane
methylene chloride
pheno 1
antimony
arseni c
. beryl 1 ium -
cadmium
chromium (total )
copper
cyanide (total )
lead
mercury
nickel
sel enium
si 1 ver
thai 1 ium
zinc
Stream
Code
1-6
1-6
1-6
1-6
1-6 -
1-6
1-6
1-6
1-6
1-6
1-6
1-6
1-6
1-6
1-6
1-6
1-6
Sample Concentrations (mg/1)
Type Source
1 0.022
1 0.003
1 ND
1 <0.010
1 <0.010
_. _1 	 <0.005 __
1 <0.020
1 <0.020
1 0.200
1 <0.02
1 <0.050
1 <0.0002
1 <0.050
1 <0.010
1 <0.010
1 <0.010
. . .. 1 . _O...Q40 . ..
Day 2 Day 3 Day 4
ND
0.110
0.038
<0.010
<0.010
	 — . 
-------
             Tabla V-U6  (Continued)

PRECIOUS METALS SAWING OR GRINDING SPENT EMULSIONS
           RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA





-J
*>.
00






Pol lutant
Nonconvent ional Pollutants (Continued)
Barium
Boron
Calcium
Chemical Oxy9en Demand (COD)
Chloride
Cobalt
Fluoride
Iron
Magnesium
Manganese
Molybdenum
Phenol ics
Phosphate
Stream
Code
1-6
1-6
1-6
1-6
1-6
1-6
1-6
1-6
1-6
1-6
1-6
1-6
1-6
Samp 1 e
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Concentrations (mg/1)
Source
0
<0.100
13.8
150
30
<0.050
0.32
0.100
2.70
0.100
<0.050
<0.005
2.7
Day 2 Day 3 Day A
<0.050
5.10
15.7
2700
40
<0.050
0.09
16.7
3.50
0.500
<0.050
<0.005
11

-------
I
                                                      Table V-116   (Continued)

                                         PRECIOUS METALS  SAWING OR  GRINDING  SPENT EMULSIONS
                                                    RAW WASTEWATER  SAMPLING  DATA
              UJ
           Pol 1utant

Nonconventional Pollutants  (Continued)


Sodium

Sulfate

Tin

Ti tanium

Total Dissolved Solids  (TDS)

Total Organic Cajrbp_n__.CIQCX:.	 -

Total Sol ids

Vanadium

Yttrium

Conventional Pollutants

Oi1 and Grease

Total Suspended Solids  (TSS)

pH (standard units)
Stream
Code
1-6
1-6
1-6
1-6
1-6
.!=?-&-•-
1-6
1-6
1-6 .
1-6
1-6
1-6
Sample Concentrations (mg/ 1 )
Type Source
1 28.0
1 740
1 <0.050
1 <0.050
1 850
--' - .—v- - 63 - - -
1 11,500 -
1 <0.050
1 <0.050
1 <1
1 300
1 6.10
Day 2 Day 3 Day 4
146
720
<0.050
<0.050
1,480
	 	 23--- 	
1 ,500
<0.050
<0.050
500
<1
7.50
                    1.  The following toxic pollutants were not detected  in this waste  stream:   1-10,  12-43,
                        45-64, and 66-88.
                    2.  No analyses were performed on the following toxic pollutants:  89-113,  116,  and 129.

-------
                           Table V-117

     PRECIOUS METALS PRESSURE BONDING CONTACT COOLING WATER
 Plant

   1

Average
    Water Use
L/kkg     gal/ton
  83.50

  83.50
20.00

20.00
Percent
Recycle

  0.0
                     Wastewater Discharge
                      L/kkg     gal/ton
83.50

83.50
20.00

20.00
                              750

-------
                                                 Table V-118

                           PRECIOUS METALS PRESSURE BONDING CONTACT COOLING WATER
                                        RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
Ul
Pol lutant
Toxic Pollutants
114. ant imony
115. arsenic
117. bery 1 1 i uni
118. cadmi urn
119. chromium
120. copper
121. cyanide (total)
'122. lead
123. mercury
124. nickel
1 25 . sel eni urn
126. silver
127. thallium
128. . zinc
Nonconvent i onal Pollutants
Aci di ty
Alkalinity
A 1 uminum
Ammonia Nitrogen
Barium
Boron
Cal cium
Stream
Code
K-2
K-2
K-2
K-2
K-2
K-2
K-2
K-2
K-2
K-2
K-2
K-2
K-2
K-2
K-2
K-2
K-2
K-2
K-2
K-2
K-2
Sampl e
Concentrations (mg/1)
' Type Source Day 1 Day 2
1 <0.010
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 0
1 0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 • <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <1
1 43
1 <0
1 0
1 <0
1 <0
1 8
.010
.005
.020
.020
. 100
.09
.050
.0002
.050 -
.010
.010
.010
.020


. 100
. 17
.050
. 100
.70

Da
<0 .
<0.

-------
NJ
                                          Table V-118  (Continued)

                          PRECIOUS METALS PRESSURE BONDING CONTACT COOLING WATER
                                       RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
Pol lutant
Nonconvent ional Pollutants (Continued)
Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD)
Chloride
Cobalt
Fluoride
Iron
Magnesium
Manganese
Molybdenum
Pheno 1 ics
Phosphate
Sodium
Sulfate
Tin
Ti tani um
Total Dissolved Solids (TDS)
Total Organic Carbon (TOO
Total Solids (TS)
Vanadium
Yttrium
Stream
Code
K-2
K-2
K-2
K-2
K-2
K-2
K-2
K-2
K-2
K-2
K-2
K-2
K-2
'K-2
K-2
K-2
K-2
K-2
K-2
Sample
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

Concentrations (mg/1)
Source Day 1 Day 2
34
35
<0
1
<0
2
'0
<0
<0
4
32
400
<0
<0
140
<1
160
<0
<0

.050
.31
.050
.10
.050
.050
.005
.8
.9

.050
.050



.050
.050

Da
42
38
<0.
1 .
29.
55.
1 .
<0.
<0.
1 1
36.
780
0,
0.
140
<1
150
<0.
<0.

x_2

050
4
4
4
UU
050
005

6

100
100



050
050

-------
                                         Table V-118   (Continued)

                         PRECIOUS METALS PRESSURE  BONDING CONTACT  COOLING WATER
                                      RAW WASTEWATER  SAMPLING  DATA
                Pollutant


     Conventional Pollutants

     Oi1 and Grease

     Total Suspended Solids  (TSS)

     pH  (standard u'nits)
Stream
Code
K-2
K-2
K-2
Sampl e
1
1
1 -
Concentrations (mg/i)
Source Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
<1 10
16 4
6.70 7.90
U1     1.  No analyses were performed on  the  following  toxic  pollutants:   1-113,  116,  and 129!
U)

-------
                           Table V-119

       PRECIOUS METALS WET AIR POLLUTION CONTROL SLOWDOWN
 Plant

   1
   2
   3
   4
   2
      Water Use
  L/kkg     gal/ton
47,500
    NR
    NR
    NR
    NR
Average  47,500
11,400
    NR
    NR
    NR
    NR

11,400
Percent
Recycle

  100
  100
   P
  NR
  NR
                         Wastewater Discharge
                          L/kkg     gal/tdn
 0.00
 0.00
NR
NR
NR

 0.00
 0.00
 0.00
NR
NR
NR

 0.00
 P - Periodic discharge
NR - Data not reported
                              754

-------
                           Table V-120

                        REFRACTORY METALS
      ROLLING SPENT NEAT OILS AND GRAPHITE-BASED LUBRICANTS
 Plant

   1
   2

Average
    Water Use
L/kkg     gal/ton
  NR
  NR

  NR
NR
NR

NR
Percent
Recycle

  100
  100
                    Wastewater Discharge*
                      L/kkg     gal/ton
0.00
0.00

0.00
0.00
0.00

0.00
NR - Data not reported

*Discharge from operation.:
                               755

-------
                           Table V-121

            REFRACTORY METALS ROLLING SPENT EMULSIONS
 Plant

   1

Average
    Water Use         Percent
L/kkg     gal/ton     Recycle
  NR

  NR
                    Wastewater Discharge*
                      L/kkg     gal/ton
NR

NR
428.8

428.8
102.8

102.8
 P - Periodic discharge
NR - Data not reported

^Discharge from operation.
                               756

-------
                           Table V-122

           REFRACTORY METALS DRAWING SPENT LUBRICANTS
 Plant

   1
   2
   3
   4
   5
   5
   6

Average
    Water Use
L/kkg     gal/ton
  NR
  NR
  NR
  NR
  NR
  NR
  NR

  NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR

NR
Percent
Recycle

  100
  100
  NR
  NR
  100
  100
  NR
                    Wastewater Discharge*
                      L/kkg     gal/ton
 0.00
 0.00
 0.00
 0.00
 0.00
 0.00
NR
              0.00
 0.00
 0.00
 0.00
 0.00
 0.00
 0.00
NR

 0.00
NR - Data not reported

*Discharge from operation,
                               757

-------
Average
                           Table V-123



          REFRACTORY METALS EXTRUSION SPENT LUBRICANTS
Plant
1
2
3
Water
L/kkg
NR
NR
NR
Use
gal/ton
NR
NR
NR
Percent
Recycle
0.0
0.0
0.0
Wastewater
L/kkg
0.00
0.00
0.00
Discharge*
gal/ton
0.09
0.00
0.00
NR
NR
0.00
0.00
NR - Data not reported



*Discharge from operation.
                               758

-------
                          ,Table V-124              ;

    REFRACTORY METALS EXTRUSION PRESS HYDRAULIC FLUID .LEAKAGE
 Plant

   .1

Average
     Water Use
 L/kkg     gal/ton
1,190

1,190
285.4

285.4
Percent
Recycle

  0.0
                     Wastewater Discharge*
                       L/kkg     gal/ton
1,190

1,190
285.4

285.4
*Discharge from operation.
                               759

-------
                                                 Table V-125
                        REFRACTORY METALS  EXTRUSION  PRESS HYDRAULIC  FLUID  LEAKAGE
                                        RAW WASTEWATER  SAMPLING  DATA
O\
O
           Pollutant


Toxic Pollutants


 11. 1,1,1-trichloroethane


 23. chloroform

 24. 2-chlorophenol

 44. methylene chloride


 58. 4-nitrophenol

 65. phenol

 66. bis(2-ethyIhexyl) phthalate


 67. butyl  benzyl phthalate

 68. di-n-butyl phthalate


 69. di-n-octyl phthalate

 70. diethyl  phthalate

 72. benzo(a)anthracene (a)

 76. chrysene(a)

 85. tetrach)oroethy1ene


 86. toluene

114. ant imony


115. arsenic

117. beryl 1ium

118. cadmium


119. chromium (total)

120. copper


122. lead  .
Stream
Code
N-2
N-2
N-2
N-2
N-2
N-2
N-2
N-2
N-2
N-2
N-2
N-2
N-2
N-2
N-2
N-2
N-2
N-2
N-2
N-2
N-2
N-2
Sample Concentrations
Type Source Day 1
1 ND
1 0.015
1 ND
1 ND
1 0.010
1 ND
1 <0.010
1 ND
1 ND
1 ND
1 ND
1 ND
1 ND
1 ND
1 ND
1 <0.002
1 ' <0.001
1 <0.0005
1 <0.001
1 0.10
1 0.030
1 0.084
(ma/ 1 )
Day 2 Da
0.
ND
<0.
0.
ND
0.
286
1 ,040
1 .
265
2.
455
455
26.
0.
0.
<0.
0.
.0.
0.
21
18

y 3
745

010
980

418


683

340


3
1 10
060
001
003
32
60



-------
                                    Table V-125 (Continued)

                  REFRACTORY METALS EXTRUSION PRESS HYDRAULIC FLUID LEAKAGE
                                 RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
Pol 1 utant
Toxic Pollutants (Continued)
123. mercury
124. nickel
125. selenium
126^ silver
127. thai 1 ium
128. zinc
•v]
O\ . Nonconvent i ona 1 Pollutants
H
Molybdenum
Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) -
Conventional Pollutants
Oi 1 and Grease
Total Suspended Solids (TSS)
pH(standard units)
Stream
Code
N-2
N-2
N-2
N-2
N-2
N-2
N-2
N-2
N-2
N-2.
N-2 '
Sample Concentrations
Type Source Day 1
1 <0.0002
1 0.11
1 <0.008
1 <0.002
1 <0.001
1 0.20
1 0.10
1 360
1 14
1 <1
1 7.4
(mg/1)'
Day 2 Day 3
<0.0002
0.44
<0.008
0.32
<0.001
18
20
350,000
44,000
19,000
,8.5
(a) .Reported together

1.   The following toxic pollutants were not  detected in this waste stream:   1-10, 12-22,
    25-43,  45-57, 59-64,  71,  73-75,  77-84,  87,  and 88.

2.   No analyses were performed on the following toxic pollutants:   89-113,  116, 121, and 129.

-------
                           Table V-126

           REFRACTORY METALS FORGING SPENT LUBRICANTS
 Plant

   1
   1
   2
   3

Average
    Water Use
L/kkg     gal/ton
   2.23
   6.75
  NR
  NR

   4.49
 0.54
 1.62
NR
NR

 1.08
Percent
Recycle

  0.0
  0.0
  0.0
  0.0
                    Wastewater Discharge*
                      L/kkg     gal/ton
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00

0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00

0.00
NR - Data not reported

*Discharge from operation.
                               762


-------
                           Table V-127

         REFRACTORY METALS FORGING CONTACT COOLING WATER
 Plant

   1
   1

Average
    Water Use
L/kkg     gal/ton
 323
  NR

 323
77.5
NR

77.5
Percent
Recycle

  0.0
  0.0
                    Wastewater Discharge*
                      L/kkg     gal/ton
323
 NR

323
77.5
NR

77.5
NR - Data not reported

*Discharge from operation.
                               763

-------
                           Table V-128

      REFRACTORY METALS METAL POWDER PRODUCTION WASTEWATER
 Plant

   1
   1
   2
   1
   3
      Water Use
  L/kkg     gal/ton
 1,183
   280.6
    37.11
   151.9
34,450
Average   7,221
  283.7
   67.29
    8.90
   36.43
8,262

1,732
Percent
Recycle

  0.0
  0.0
  0.0
  0.0
  0.0
                       Wastewater Discharge*
                         L/kkg     gal/ton
     0.00
     0.00
    36.02
   151.9
34,450

11,550
    0.00
    0.00
    8.64
   36.43
8,262

2,769
*Discharge from operation.
                               764

-------
                           Table V-129

                 REFRACTORY METALS METAL POWDER
                   PRODUCTION FLOOR WASHWATER
Plant
1
2
Water
L/kkg
183.4
35.83
Use
gal/ton
43.99
8.59
Percent
Recycle
100
0.0
Wastewater
L/kkg
0.00
35.83
Discharge*
gal/ton
0.00
8.59
Average
109.6
26.29
35.83
8.59
*Discharge from operation.
                               765

-------
                           Table V-130

                 REFRACTORY METALS METAL POWDER
                    PRESSING SPENT LUBRICANTS
 Plant

   1

Average
    Water Use
L/kkg     gal/ton
  NR

  NR
NR

NR
Percent
Recycle

  100
                    Wastewater Discharge*
                      L/kkg     gal/ton
0.00

0.00
0.00

0.00
NR - Data not reported

*Discharge from operation.
                              766

-------
                           Table V-131

         REFRACTORY METALS SURFACE TREATMENT SPENT BATHS
                  Plant

                    1
                    2
                    3
                    4
                    2
                    5
                    6
                    7
                    8
                    6
                    7
                    2
                    6
                    9
                    10

                Average
  Wastewater Discharge*
   L/kkg     gal/ton
   13.09
   94.12
  232.3
  343.9
  469.8
1,180
   NR
   NR
   NR
   NR
   NR
   NR
   NR
   NR
   NR

  388.8
  3.14
 22.57
 55.71
 82.47
112.7
282.9
 NR
 NR
 NR
 NR
 NR
 NR
 NR
 NR
 NR

 93.25
NR - Data not reported

*Discharge from operation.
                               767

-------
                                                Table V-132

                             REFRACTORY METALS SURFACE TREATMENT SPENT BATHS
                                       RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
00
Pol lutant
Toxic Pol lutants
114. antimony
115. arsenic
117. beryl 1 ium
118. cadmium
119. chromium (total)
120. copper
121. cyanide (total)
122. lead
123. mercury
124. nickel
1 25 . se 1 eni urn
126. silver
127. thai 1 ium
128. zinc
Nonconvent ional Pollutants
Acidity
Alkal inity ...._.
Al umi num
Ammonia Nitrogen
Barium
Boron
Cal cium
Stream
Code

M-6
M-6
M-6
M-6 _
M-6
. M-6
M-6
M-6
M-6
M-6
M-6
M-6
M-6
M-6
M-6
M-6 ' '
M-6
M-6-
M-6
M-6
M-6
Sample
Concentrations (mg/1)
Type Source
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 0
1 *1
1 100
1 0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 36
.010
.010
.005
.020
.020
.050
.02
.050
.0002
.050
.010
.010
.010
.080


.200
. 1
.050
.100
.5
Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
<0
<0
<0
0
0
6
<0
<0
0
12
<0
6
<0
1
1 ,900
<1
0
<0
<0
9
39
.050
.010
.005
.500
.100
.30
.02
. 100
.0002
.4
.010
. 10
.100
.75


.400
. 1
.050
.00
. 1 ,

-------
                                          Table V-132  (Continued)

                             REFRACTORY METALS SURFACE TREATMENT SPENT  BATHS
                                       RAW WASTEWATER  SAMPLING DATA
vo
, Pol 1 utant
Stream
Code
Sample Concentrations (mg/1)
Type Source Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
Nonconvent i onal Pollutants (Continued)
Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD)
Chloride
Cobalt
Fl uoride
Iron
Magnesium
Manganese
Molybdenum
Phenol ics
Phosphate
Sodium
Sulfate
Tin
Ti tani um
Total Dissolved So-lids (TDS)
Total -Organic Carbon (TOC)
Total Solids (TS)
Vanadium
Ytt ri um
M-6
M-6
M-6
M-6
M-6
M-6
M-6
M-6
M-6
M-6
M-6
M-6
M-6
M-6 -
M-6
M-6
M-6
M-6
M-6
1 <5
1 10
1 <0.050
1 0.85
1 <0.050
1 11.3
1 <0.050
1 <0.050
1 <0.005
1 <4
1 5.20
1 43
1 <0.050
1 <0.050
1 270
1 <1
1 280
1 <0.050
1 <0.050
' 1,800
100
<0.
0.
1-4.
13.
0.
0.
<°-
<4 '
60.
61
<0.
0.
660
"12
1 ,300
<0 .

-------
                                          Table V-132 (Continued)

                             REFRACTORY METALS SURFACE TREATMENT SPENT BATHS
                                       RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
                 Pollutant
                                             Stream
                                              Code
                                                           	Concentrations (rng/1)
                                                           Source    Day 1     Day 2
      Conventional Pollutants

      Oil and Grease

      Total Suspended Solids (TSS)

      pH (standard units)
M-6
M-6
M-6
1 3
1 14
1 7.30
<1
140
0.80
•v]
^J
O
1.   No analyses were performed on the following toxic pollutants:  1-113, 116, and  129.

-------
                           Table V-133

            REFRACTORY METALS SURFACE TREATMENT RINSE
               Water Use
 Plant     L/kkg     gal/ton
1
2
3
4
2
5
6
6
7
6
8
9
10
2
5,949
NR
9,673
24,570
NR
444,800
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
1,427
NR
2,320
5,893
NR
106,700
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
Percent
Recycle
0.0
CCR
0.0
0.0
CCR
0.0
NR
NR
P
0.0
NR
0.0
NR
NR
Wast-
L/:
5,949
9,381
9,673
24,570
27,970
444,.800
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
                        Wastewater Discharge*
                               }     gal/ton

                                  1,427
                                  2,250
                                  2,320
                                  5,89.3
                                  6,707
                               :106,700
                                     NR
                                     NR
                                     NR
                               '•      NR
                                     NR
                                     NR
                                     NR
                                     NR
Average 121,200
29,090
87,060
20,880
  P - Periodic discharge
 NR - Data not reported
CCR - Two stage countercurrent rinsing in-place

^Discharge from operation.
                               771

-------
                           REFRACTORY METAl S  IUH'RK t  IMHATMtNl"
                                 RAW V»ASTEWATE:R  SAMPLING DATA
           PoIlutant

Toxic Pollutants

114. antimony




115. arsenic




117. bery11ium




118. cadmi urn




119. chromium  (.total)




120. copper




121. cyanide  (total)


122. lead
                                        Stream
                                         Coda
M-7
M-10
0-2
Z-1

M-7'
M-10
0-2
Z-1

M-7
M-10
0-2
Z-1

M-7
M-10
0-2
Z-1

M-7
M-10
0-2
Z-1

M-7
M-10
0-2
Z-1

M-7
M-10

M-7
M-10
0-2
Z-1
                   	Concentrations  (mg/1)
                   Source    Day  1     Day 2
1
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
<0.010
<0.010
<0.10
0.0004
<0.010
<0.010
<0.01
<0.001
<0.005
<0.005
<0.001
<0.01
<0.020
<0.020
<0.002
<0.01
<0.020
<0.020
<0.005
0.038
<0.050
<0.050
0.030
0.013
<0.02
<0.02
<0.050
<0.050
<0.020
0.097
0.00025
 0.0018
<0.01
 0.03
 0. 1 1
 0.12
           1.010
           ). 100
           1.010
           ).010
           1.005
           1.200
           1.020
           1.040
         <0.020
          0.440
          0.050
          0.400
         <0 .02
         <0.02

         <0.050
          0.500
                  <0. 1
                  <0.01
                   0.004
                   0.040
                   0. 100
                   0.200
                                                                                        0.060
                                                                      0. 16

-------
                                           Table V-134 (Continued)

                                  REFRACTORY METALS SURFACE TREATMENT RINSE
                                        RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
                  Pollutant
       Toxic Pollutants (Continued)
Stream
 Code
                                                                      Concentrations (mg/1)
                                                                  Source
>J
Ui
       123.  mercury
       124.  nickel
       125.  se1eni um
       126.  silver
       127.  thallium
       128. zinc
 M-7
 M-10
 0-2
 Z-1

 M-7
 M-10
 0-2
 Z-1

 M-7
 M-10
 0-2
 Z-1

 M-7
 M-10
 0-2-
 Z-1

 M-7
 M-10
 0-2
 Z-1

 M-7
 M-10
 0-2
 Z-1
1
1
2
1

1
1
2
1

1
1
2
1

1
1
2
1

1
1
2
1

1
1
2
1
<0.0002
<0.0002
<0.0001,
<0.005   <0.005

<0.050
<0.050
<0.005
 0.038
                                                                            0.086
         <0.0004
                                                                           0.0005
<0.010
<0.010
<0.01
 0.0004

<0.010
<0.010
<0.02
 0.0005

<0.010
<0.010
<0.001   <0.001

 0.080
 0.080
<0.060
<0.25     0.034
                                                                                    <0.0002
                                                                                    <0.0002
                                                                                     0.600
                                                                                    10.2
                                                                                    <0.010
                                                                                    <0.010
                                                                                     0.050
                                                                                    <0.010
                                                                                    <0.050
                                                                                    <0.010
                                                                                    0.040
                                                                                    0.080
                                                                                              0.0001
                                                                                              0.070
                                                                                             <0.01
                                                                                             <0.02
                                                                                             <0.2
                                                                                              0.200

-------
                                        Table V-134  (Continued)

                              REFRACTORY METALS SURFACE TREATMENT RINSE
                                     RAW WASTEWATER  SAMPLING DATA
vj
^J
*>. .
           Pallutant

Nonconvent1ona1  Pollutants


Acidity



Alkalinity



Aluminum




Ammonia Nitrogen

Barium




Boron



Calci urn




Chemical  Oxygen Demand  (COD)


Chloride    	
Stream
Code
M-7
M-10
Z-1
M-7
M-10
Z-1
M-7
M-10
0-2
Z-1
M-7
M-7
M-10
0-2
Z-1
M-7
M-10
Z-1
M-7
M-10
0-2
Z-1
M-7
0-2
- -M-7 •
M-10
0-2
Samp 1 e
Type
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
1 	
1
2
Concentrations (ma/ 1 )
Source Day 1
<1 1
<1
<10 1,200
100
100
69 <10
0.200
0.200
<0.050
0.11 0.46
<0. 1
<0.050
<0.050
0.020
0.04 0.012
<0. 100
<0. 100
0.5 0.97
36.5
36.5
<5.0
79 5
<5
8
10
10

Day 2 Day 3
,500
890

<1
<1

0.200
19.6
<0.500

<0.1
<0.050
0.100
0.040

0.100
46.4

33.8
37.6
<5.0

<5
114 -
- 930 - - - •
12
12

-------
                                           Table V-134 (Continued)

                                 REFRACTORY METALS SURFACE TREATMENT RINSE
                                        RAW- WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
01
           Pol 1utant

Nonconventional Pollutants  (Continued)

Cobalt



Co 1umbi urn

F1 uoride  :. • •              -- ' .




Iron




Magnesi urn




Manganese




Mo 1ybdenum
Stream
Code
M-7
M-10
Z-1
Z-l
M-7
M-10
0-2
Z-1 "
M-7
M-10
0-2
Z-1
M-7
M-10
0-2
Z-1
M-7
M-10
0-2
Z-1
M-7
M-10
0-2
Z-1
Sampl e
Type
1
- 1
1
1
-. 1
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
1 .
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
Concentrations (mg/1)
Source
<0.050
<0.050
<0.01
ND
0.85
0.85

0.2
<0.050
' <0.050
<0.200
0.24
11 .3
11 .3
0.7
8.0
<0.050
<0.050 .
<0.005
0.012
<0 .050
<0.050
<0.005
<0.03
Day 1 Day 2
<0.050
<1.00
<0.01
4.4
1 -. 1
3,000

82
0.300
2 . 00

0.72
10.7
11.8

0.034
<0.050
<0.100

0.03
<0.050
0.700

<0.03 	 '
                                                                                               5.2
                                                                                               5.00
                                                                                               0.9
                                                                                               0.080
                                                                                              . 0.4.00

-------
                                   Table V-134 (Continued)

                          REFRACTORY METALS SURFACE TREATMENT RINSE
                                     WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
           PoIlutant

Nonconventional Pollutants (Continued)

Phenolics

Phosphate

Sodium




Sulfate


Tantalurn

Tin




Titanium




Total Dissolved  Solids  (TDS)



Total Organic  Carbon  (TOO


Total Solids  (TS)
Stream
Code
M-7
M-7
M-7
M-10
0-2
Z-1
M-7
M-10
Z-1
M-7
M-10
0-2
Z-1
M-7 -
M-10
0-2
Z-1
M-7
M-10
Z-1
M-7
0-2
M-7
M-10
Z-1
Samp 1 e
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1 •
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
Concentrations (mg/i)
Source Day 1
<0.005
<4
5.20
5.20
<15
27 43
43
43
ND 9.2
<0.050
<0.050
<0.005
<0.28 <0.28
<0.050
<0.050
<0.020
<0.25 2
270
270
110 87
<1
6
280
280
390 390
Day 2 Day 3
<0.005
<4
7.60
36.8
27

44
380

<0.100
<1 .00
0.010

<0.050
<0. 100
0.020

270
770

9
46
330
980


-------
                                    Table  V-134  .(Continued)

                           REFRACTORY  METALS  SURFACE TREATMENT RINSE
                                  RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
           Pollutant
Nonconventional Pollutants  (Continued)
Vanad'i urn
Yttrium
Zi rcon iuni
Conventional Pollutants
O'i1  and Grease
Total Suspended Solids  (TSS)
pH (standard units)
Stream
Code .
M-7
M-10
0-2
Z-1
M-7
M-10
0-2
Z-1
Z-1
M-7
0-2
M-7 -
M-10
0-2
Z-1
M-7
M-10
Z-1
Sampl e
Type
1
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
Concentrations (mg/1)
Source Day 1
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
0
3

14
14
<1
100
7
7
6
.050
.050
.010
.02 0.031
.050
.050
.020
.25 <0.25
.26 0.64 •





15
.30
.30
2
Day 2 Day 3
<0.050
<0. 100
0.020

<0.050
<0. 100
<0.020


<1
6
120
140
52

1 .50
2.10

       analyses were performed on the following  toxic pollutants":   1-113,  116,  and 129.

-------
                          Table V-135

         REFRACTORY METALS ALKALINE CLEANING SPENT BATHS
                  Plant

                    1
                    2
                    3
                    4
                    5
                    6
                    7
                    8
                    9
                    10
                    11
                    10
                    12
                    13

                Average
Wastewater Discharge*
 L/kkg     gal/ton
 95.00
435.6
472.0
 NR
 NR
 NR
 NR
 NR
 NR
 NR
 NR '
 NR
 NR
 NR

334.2
 22.80
104.5
113.2
 NR
 NR
 NR
 NR
 NR
 NR
 NR
 NR
 NR
 NR
 NR

 80.15
NR - Data not reported

*Discharge from operation.
                              778

-------
                                                Table  V-136

                              REFRACTORY  METALS  ALKALINE  CLEANING SPENT BATHS
                                       RAW WASTEWATER  SAMPLING  DATA
vo
Po 1 1 utant •
Toxi c Pol 1 utants
114. antimony
115. arseni c
117. bery 1 1 i urn
118. cadmium
119. chromium (total)
120. copper
122. lead
123. mercury
124. nickel
1 25 . se 1 eni um
126. silver
127. thai 1 ium
128. zinc
Nonconvent i onal Pollutants
Acidity
Alkal inity
Aluminum
Barium
Boron
Cal cium
Cobalt
Col umbium
Stream
Code
Z-3
Z-3
Z-3
Z-3
Z-3
Z-3
Z-3
Z-3
Z-3
Z-3
Z-3
Z-3
Z-3
Z-3
Z-3
Z-3
Z-3
Z-3
Z-3
Z-3
Z-3
Sampl e
Concentrations (mg/1)
Type Source
1 0
1 . <0
1 - <0
1 <0
1 0
1 0
' 1 0
1 <0
1 0
1 0
1 0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <10
1 69
1 0
1 '0
1 0
1 79
1 <0
1
.0004
.001
.01
.01
.038
.013
.097
.005
.038
.0004
. 0005
.001
.25

>9
. 1 1
.04
.5

.01
ND
Da
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
9.
<0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
<1.
<10
,500
17
0.
170
180
0.
865
y 1 Day 2 Day 3
00028
016
036
02
75
96
9
005
65
001 1
0055
0028
6



35


036


-------
                                    Table V-136 (Continued)

                        REFRACTORY METALS ALKALINE CLEANING  SPENT BATHS
                                 RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
Pol lutant
Nonconventi onal Pollutants (Continued)
Fluoride
Iron
Magnesium
Manganese
Molybdenum
Sodium
~J Tantalum
00
0 Tin
Titanium
Total Dissolved Solids (TDS)
Total Solids (TS)
Vanadium
Yttrium
Zi rconium
Convent i ona.l Pollutants
Oi 1 and Grease
Total Suspended Solnds (TSS)
pH (standard units).
Stream Sample
Code Type
Z-3 1
Z-3 1
Z-3 1
Z-3 1
Z-3 1
Z-3 1
Z-3 1
Z-3 1
Z-3 1
Z-3 1
Z-3 1
Z-3 1
Z-3 1
Z-3 1
Z-3 1
Z-3 1
Z-3 1
Concentrations (mg/ l_l
Source
0.2
0.24
8.0
0.012
<0.03
27 31
ND
<0.28
<0.25
110
390
<0.02
<0.25
0.26
<1
100
6
Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
41
8.5
4. 1
0. 18
0.7
,000
585
<0.28
6.5
200.0
295.0
0.37
<0.25
8.5
13
54.0
14
1.   No analyses were performed on the following toxic pollutants:   1-113,  116,  121,  and 129.

-------
                          ; Table V-137

            REFRACTORY METALS ALKALINE CLEANING RINSE
               Water Use
 Plant     L/kkg     gal/ton
              Percent    Wastewater Discharge*
              Recycle -     L/kkg     gal/ton
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
6
7
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
9,874
20,910
33,860
36,730
43,220
103,000
226,100
240,200
909,400
2,102,000
5,254,000
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
2,368
5,014
8,119
• 8,807
10,370
24,700
54,210
57,600
218,100
504,000
1,260,000
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
                                   0.0
                                   0.0
                                   0.0
                                   0.0
                                   0.0
                                   0.0
                                   0.0
                                   0.0
                                   0.0
                                   0.0
                                   0.0
                                   NR
                                    p
                                   0.0
                                   NR
                                   0.0
                                   0.0
                                   NR
                        9
                       20
                       33
                       36
                       43
                      103
                      226
                      240
                      909
                    2,102
                    5,254
Average 816,300
195,800
   ,874
   ,910
   ,860
   ,730
   ,220
   ,000
   ,100
   ,200
   ,400
   ,000
   ,000
     NR
     NR
     NR
     NR
     NR
     NR
     NR
816,300
    2,368
  '  5,014
    8,119
    8,807
   10,370
   24,700
   54,210
  : 57,600
  -218,100
  504,000
1,260,000
       NR
       NR
       NR
       NR
       NR
       NR
  ;     NR

  195,800
 P - Periodic discharge
NR - Data not reported

*Discharge from operation.
                               78.1

-------
                           Table V-138

               REFRACTORY METALS MOLTEN SALT RINSE
               Water Use
 Plant     L/kkg     gal/ton
Average   6,326
            Percent    Wastewater Discharge*
            Recycle      L/kkg     gal/ton
1
2
3
3
4
5
52.13
1,830
3,739
5,594
20,416
NR
12.50
438.8
896.7
1,341
4,896
NR
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
NR
52.13
1,830
3,739
5,594
20,416
NR
12.50
438.8
896.7
1,341
4,896
NR
1,517
6,326
1,517
NR - Data not reported

*Discharge from operation.
                              782

-------
                                                 Table  V-139


                                    REFRACTORY METALS  MOLTEN SALT  RINSE
                                        RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING  DATA
00
u>
                   Pollutant


       Toxic  Pollutants


         11.  1 , 1 ,. 1-trichl oroethane


         23.  chloroform


         44.  methylene chloride


         58.  4-nitropheno1


         66.  bis(-2-ethy Ihexy 1 ) phthalate


         85.  tetrachioroethy1ene


       104.  gamma-BHC


       114.  antimony
        115.  arsenic
        117.  beryl 1iurn
        118.  cadmi um
        119.  chromium  (total)
        120.  copper
Stream
Code
N-3
N-3
N-3
N-3
N-3
N-3
N-3
M-4
M-9
N-3
Z-4
M-4 .
M-9
N-3
Z-4
M-4
M-9
N-3
Z-4
M-4
M-9
N-3
Z-4
M-4.
M-9
N-3
Z-4
M-4
M-9
N-3
Z-4
Sampl e
Type
'1
1
1
3
3
1
3
1
1
3
1.
1
1
3
1
1
. 1
3
, 1
1
1
3
1
• 1
1
3
1
1
• 1
1
1
Concentrations (mg/1)
Source
Day 1
ND
0.015
ND
0.010
<0.010
ND
<0
<0
<0
<0
0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
0
0
<0
<0
0
0
.005
.010
.010
.002
.0004
.010
.010
.001
.001
.005
-.005
.0005
.01
.020
.020
.001
.01
.020
.020
. 10
.038
:050
.050
.030
.013

<0


<0
<0


<0
<0


0
<0


<0
<0


0
<0


0

.050


.00025
.020'


.001
.010


.022
.050


.01
.050


.059
.050


.023
Day 2
<0
<0
<0
0

<0

0

<0

<0

<0

<0

<0

<0

0

0

0

0

.010
.010
.010
ND
ND
.017
ND
.040

.003

.020

.001

.010

.0005

.050

.001

.400

.095

.050

.035

Day 3


<0.050
<0.010


<0.020
<0,020


<0.010
<0.005 •


<0.050
<0.020


0.400
0.020


0.050
<0.050 .



-------
                                         Table V-139 (Continued)

                                  REFRACTORY METALS MOLTEN SALT RINSE
                                      RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
CO
                 Pollutant

      Toxic Pollutants (Continued)


      121. cyanide  (total)



      122. lead
       123.  mercury
       124.  nickel
       125.  selenium
       126.  silver
       1 27. thai 1ium
       128. zinc
Stream
Code
M-4
M-9
N-3
M-4
M-9
N-3
Z-4
M-4
M— 9
N-3
Z-4
M-4
M-9
N-3
Z-4
M-4
M-9
N-3
Z-4
M-4
M-9
N-3
Z-4
M-4
N-3
Z-4
M-4
M-9
N-3
Z-4
Sample Concentrations (ms/1)
Type Source
1 <0.02
1 <0.02
1 0.003
1 <0.050
1 <0.050
3 0.084
1 0.097
1 <0.0002
1 <0.0002
3 <0.0002
1 <0.005
1 <0.050
1 <0.050
3 0.11
1 0.038
1 <0.010
1 <0.010
3 <0.008
1 0.0004
1 <0.010
1 <0.010
3 ' <0.002
1 0.0005
1 <0. 010 -
3 <0.001
1 <0.001
1 0.080
1 0.080
3 0.20
1 <0.25
Day 1
<0.02

<0. 100

0.21
<0.0002

<0.005
<0.200

0.43
<0.020

<0.0004
0.040

<0.0005
<0.010

<0.001
0. 150

0.034
Day 2
<0.02
<0.001
<0. 100
0.070

<0.0002
<0.0002

<0.200
0.016

<0.020
<0.008

0.020
<0.002

<0.0.10
<0.001 '

<0.500
0.10


Day 3
<0.02
<0.02

<0. 100
0.050


<0.0002
<0.0002


<0.200
<0.050


<0.020
<0.020


0.026
<0.020


<0.050


<1 .00
0.020



-------
                                         Table V-139 (Continued)

                                  REFRACTORY METALS MOLTEN SALT RINSE
                                      RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
vj
00
U1
           Pol 1utant


Nonconventional  Pollutants

Acidity



Alkalini ty



Aluminum



Ammonia Nitrogen


Barium



Boron



Calcium



Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD)


Chloride


Cobalt



Columbium

Fluoride
Stream
Code
M-4
M-9
Z-4
M-4
M-9
Z-4
M-4
M-9
Z-4
M-4
M-9
M-4
M-9
Z-4
M-4
M-9
Z-4
M-4
M-9
Z-4
M-4
M-9
M-4
M-9
M-4
M-9
Z-4
Z-4
M-4
M-9
Z-4
Sampl e
Concentrations (mg/1)
Type Source
1 <1
1 . -<1
1 <10
1 100
1 100
1 69
1 0
1 0
'•-••<]• - 0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 0
1 <0
1 <0
1 0
1 36
1 36
1 79
1 <5
1 <5
1 10
1 10
1 <0
1 <0
1 . <0
1
1 0
1 0
1 0


;,


.200
.200
.11
. 1
.1
.050
.050
.04-
. 100
. 100
.5
.5
.5





.050
.050
.01
ND
.85
.85
.2
Day 1 Day 2
<1 <1
27
1 ,900 26,000
1
3
<10.0 2.00

0.23
<0 .' 1 <0 . 1

<5.00 <0.500

0.052
10.0 5.00

0.3
<10.0 1.00

8.6
120 110

110 21

<5.00 <0.500

<0.01
2.3
1.7 0 . 65

18
Day 3
<,

690
,940

3.00
0. 100

0.22
<0. 1
<0.500
<0.050

6.00
<0. 100

1 .00
20.7

100
<5
120
14
<0.500
<0.050


0.67
0.82


-------
                                         Table V-139 (Continued)

                                  REFRACTORY METALS MOLTEN SALT RINSE
                                      RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
-J
00
           Pollutant



Nonconvent1ona1  Po11utants (Continued)



Iron




Magnesium




Manganese




Molybdenum





Phenoli cs




Phosphate


Sodium




Sulfate


Tantalum

Tin




Titanium
Stream
Code
M-4
M-9
Z-4
M-4
M-9
Z-4
M-4
M-9
Z-4
M-4
M-'9
N-3
Z-4
M-4
M-9
N-3
M-4
M-9
M-4
M-9
Z-4
M-4
M-9
Z-4
M-4
M-9
Z-4
M-4
M-9
Z-4
Sample
Type
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
- 1
1
Concentrations (mg/1)
Source
<0 . 050
<0.050
0.24
11.3
11 .3
8.0
<0.050
<0.050
0.012
<0.050
<0.050
0.10
<0.03
<0.005
<0.005
0.0017
<4
<4
5.20 0
5.20
27
43
43
" ND
<0.050
<0.050
<0.28
<0.050

-------
                                           Tabl-e V-139 (Continued)

                                    REFRACTORY METALS MOLTEN SALT RINSE
                                        RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
-J
00
                   Pol 1utant
       Nonconventiona1  Pollutants  (Continued)
       Total Dissolved  Solids  (TDS)
       Total Organic  Carbon  (TOC).
       Total  Solids  (TS) '
       Vanadium
       Yttri urn
Stream
Code
M-4
M-9
N-3
Z-4
M-4 -
' M-9
M-4
M-9
Z-4
M-4
M-9
Z-4
M-4
M-9
Z-4
Sampl e
Concentrations (mg/1)
Type Source
1 270
1 270
3 360
1 110
.. . 1 . <1
1 <1
1 280
1 280
1 390
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
20

3
.050
.050
.02
.050
.050
.25
Day
,000
107.0
50
,000
178.0
<5.00
<0.02
<5.00
<0.25
I Day 2
19,000 22,
2,
490
22
24,000 33
2
<0.500
<0.500
Day 3
000
500
18
70
,000
,500
<0.500
<0.050
<0.500
<0.050
       Zi rconium
                                                Z-4
                                                                    0.26
                                                                            <0. 13

-------
                                          Table V-139 (ConHnuod)

                                   REFRACTORY METALS MOLTEN SALT RINSE
                                       RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
                  Pollutant


       Conventional  Pollutants

       Oil  and Grease


       Total  Suspended Solids (TSS)




       pH (standard  units)
                                              Stream
                                               Code
Concentrations (mg/1)
M-4
M-9
M-4
M-9
N-3
Z-4
M-4
M-9
N-3 (
Z-4
3
3
14
14
14
100
7
7
3 <1
1 ' 6






.30
.30


Source
3
3
14
14
14
100
7.30
7.30
<1
Day 1 Day 2
<1 <1

540 240

<1
80.0
11.80 11.90

8.0
Day 3

<1
130
230


11 .80
1 1 .80

00
00
       1.   Toxic pollutants 89-113 were analyzed in this waste stream.

       2.   The following toxic pollutants were not detected in this waste stream:  1-10,  12-22,
           24-43,  45-57, 59-65,  67-84,  86-103, and 105-113.
       3.   No analyses were performed on the following toxic pollutants:   116 and 129.

-------
                           Table V-140

       REFRACTORY METALS TUMBLING OR BURNISHING WASTEWATER
 Plant

   1
   2
   3
   2
   4
   2
   5
   5
   6
   7
       Water Use
   L/kkg     gal/ton
    952.7
    992.8
  1,359
  5,745
 19,300
 65,010
599,300
666,100
     NR
     NR
Average 169,800
    228.5
    238.1
    325.9
  1,378
  4,628
 15,590
143,700
159,700
     NR
     NR

 40,720
Percent
Recycle

  0.0
  0.0
  0.0
  0.0
  0.0
  0.0
  0.0
  0.0
  NR
  NR
                         Wastewater Discharge*
                           L/kkg:     gal/ton
    952.7
    992.8
  1,359
  5,745
 19,300
 65,010
599,300
666,100
     NR
     NR

169,800
    228.5
    238.1
    325.9
  1,378
  4,628
 15,590
143,700
159,700
     NR
     NR

 40,720
NR - Data not reported   :

*Discharge from operation.
                               789

-------
                                                Table V-141

                            REFRACTORY METALS TUMBLING OR BURNISHING WASTEWATER
                                        RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
-J
VO
O
           Pollutant

Toxic Pollutants

11. 1,1,1-trichloroethane



23. chloroform



44. methylene chloride



55. naphthalene



66. bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate



114. antimony



115. arseni c



117. beryl 1ium



118. cadmium



119. chromium (total)
Stream
Code
M-2
M-3
M-13
M-2
M-3
M-13
M-2
M-3
M-13
M-2
M-3
M-13
M-2
M-3
M-13
M-2
M-3
M-13
M-2
M-3
M-13
M-2
M-3
M-13
M-2
M-3
M-13
M-2
M-3
M-13
Sample
Type
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
'l
1
2
1
1
2
1-
Concent rat ions
Source Day 1
0.011 0.011
0.011
0.01 1
0.016 ND
•0.016
0.016
0.001 0.002
0.001
0.001
ND ND
ND
ND
ND ND
ND
ND
<0.010 <0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010 '<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.005 <0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.020 <0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.030 0.020
<0,020
<0.020
(mg/1)
Day 2
0.011


ND


0.002


0.002


0.001


<0.. 0 1 0


<0.010


<0.005


0. 120


0.780



Day 3
0.015
0.017
0.018
ND
0.007
0.006
0.002
0.008
0.004
ND
ND
ND
0.002
ND
0.014
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010

-------
                                   Table V-141 (Continued)

                     REFRACTORY METALS TUMBLING OR BURNISHING WASTEWATER
                                 RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
           Pol 1utant
Toxic Pol 1utants (Continued)
120. copper
121 .  cyanide (total)
122. lead
123.  mercury
124. nickel
125. selenium
126. siIver
127. thallium
128. zinc
Stream
Code
M-2
M-3
M-13
M-2
M-3
M-13
M-2 . '
M-3 -
M-13
' M-2
M-3
M-13.
M-2
M-3
M-13
M-2
'M-3
M-13
M-2
M-3
M-13
M-2
M-3
M-13
M-2
M-3
M-13
Sample
Type
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
• 1
1
2
1
1
2
1 -
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
Concentrations (tng/1)
Source Day 1 Day 2
<0.050 1 .90 8.65
<0.050
<0.050
<0. 02 , <0.02 <0.02
<0. 02
<0.02
<0.050 <0.500 <10.0
<0.050
<0.050
<0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002
<0.0002
<0.0002
<0.050 0.750 23.7
<0.050
<0.050
<0.010 <0.010 <0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010 0.140 0.220
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010 <0.010 <0.010
<0.010
<0.010
0.080 0.060 <0.500
0.080
0.080

Day 3
3.95
2.15
<0. 100
<0.02
<0 . 02
<0 . 02
<5. 00
<1 .00
< 1 0 . 0
<0. 0002
<0.0002
<0.0002
16.0
103
<0. 100
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
0. 150-
0 . 140
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0 .500
0.520
<0.500

-------
                                         Table V-141  (Continued)

                           REFRACTORY METALS TUMBLING OR  BURNISHING  WASTEWATER
                                       RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING  DATA
to
                 Pollutant
      Nonconventional Pollutants
      Acidity
      Alkalini ty
      Aluminum
      Ammonia Nitrogen
      Bari urn
      Boron
      Calcium
      Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD)
      Chloride
Stream
Code
M-2
M-3
M-13
M-2
M-3
M-13
M-2
M-3
M-13
M-2
M-3
M-13
M-2
M-3
M-13
M-2
M-3
M-13
M-2
M-3
M-13
M-2
M-3
M-13
M-2
M-3
M-13
Sample
Type
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
1

Concentrations (mg/1)
Source Day 1 Day 2
<1
<1
<1
100
100
100
0
0
0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
36
36
36
<5
<5
<5
10
10
10
<1 <1


100 41
1

.200 0.500 23.4
.200
.200
. 1 <0. 1 1.6
. 1
. 1
.050 <0.050 0.400
.050
.050
.100 <0.100 1.70
. 100
. 100
.5 35.3 43.5
.5
.5
<5 11


7.1 17



Da
<1
<1
<1
85
,260
190
16.
3.
21 .
0.
0.
<0.
0.
0.
0.
8.
1 .
0.
41 .
36.
41 .
<5
120
<5
14
13
2a

y 3






7
10
6
41
3
1
200
050
100
20
60
500
2
5
0







-------
                                          Table  V-141  (Continued)

                           REFRACTORY  METALS  TUMBLING OR BURNISHING WASTEWATER
                                        RAW  WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
10
U)
                 Pollutant
      Nonconvent1onal Pollutants  (Continued)
      Cobalt
      Fluoride
      Iron
      Magnesium
      Manganese
      Mo)ybdenum
      Phenol1cs-
      Phosphate
Stream
Code
M-2
M-3
M-13
M-2
M-3
M-13
M-2
M-3
M-13
M-2
M-3
M-13
M-2
M-3
M-13
M-2
M-3
M-13
M_2_ . .
M-3
M-13
M-2
M-3
M-13
Sample
Type
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
_,_
1
" 1
1
2
1

Concentrations, (mg/1)
Source Day 1 Day 2
<0
<0
<0
0
0
0
<0
<0
<0
1 1
1 1
1 1
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<4
<4
<4
.050 <0.050 0.100
.050
.050
.85 2.2 0.86
.85
.85
.050 0.800 15.1
.050
.050
.3 11.1 13.6
.3
.3
.050 0.050 0.750
.050
.050
.050 0.400 4.45
.050
.050
.005 <0.005 0.007
.005
.005
12 29



Day 3
0.050
0.050
0.100
0.79
1.0
0.78
8.05
17.6
4.60
12.7
11.6
13.4
0.350
0.300
0.200
0:950
<0.050
<0.500
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
23
120
17

-------
                                         Table V-141  (Continued)

                           REFRACTORY METALS TUMBLING OR BURNISHING WASTEWATER
                                       RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
                 Pollutant
Stream    Sample
 Code      Type
                                                                     Concentrations (mg/1)
                                                                 Source
      Nonconventional  Pollutants (Continued)
-J
vo
*»
      Sodium
      Sulfate
      Tin
      Ti tanium
      Total Dissolved Solids (TDS)
      Total Organic Carbon (TOC)
      Total  Solids (TS)
      Vanadium
 M-2
 M-3
 M-13

 M-2
 M-3
 M-13

 M-2
 M-3
 M-13

 M-2
 M-3
 M-13

 M-2
 M-3
 M-13

 M-2
 M-3
 M-13

 M-2
 M-3
 M-13

 M-2
 M-3
 M-13
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
5.20
5.20
5.20
43
43
43
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
270
270
270
<1
<1
<1
280
280
280
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
                                                                           6.80
                                                                          45
                                                                           0.050
                                                                                   18.5
                                                                                   62
                                                                          <0.100   <0.500
                                                                                    0.950
                   19.3
                  561
                   65.6

                   49
                  130
                   65

                   <0.500
                   <0.500
                   <0.500

                    0.550
                    1 .55
                    3.80
200
                                                                          17
                                                                         390
                                                                                1 ,500
                                                                                   15
                                                                                3, 100
                1 ,600
                1 ,900
                  530

                    4
                   75
                   22

                3,500
                3,000
                3,200
                                                                          <0.050
                                                                                    0.800
                                                                                             0.350
                                                                                            <0.050
                                                                                            <0.100

-------
                                         Table V-141 (Continued)

                          REFRACTORY METALS TUMBLING OR BURNISHING WASTEWATER
                                      RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
VD
Ul
           Pol 1utant

Nonconventlonal Pollutants (Continued)

Yttriurn



Conventional Pol.lutants

Oi1 and Grease"



Total Suspended Solids (TSS)



pH (standard units)
Stream
Code
M-2
M-3
M-13
M-2"
M-3
M-13
M-2
M-3
M-13
M-2
M-3
M-13
Sampl e
Type
1
•2
1
1
1
- 1
1
2
1
1 . •
2
1

Concentrations (mg/1)
Source Day 1 Day 2
<0
<0
<0
3
3
3
14
14
14
7
7
7
.050 <0:050 <0.050
.050
.050
<1 
-------
                           Table V-142

      REFRACTORY METALS SAWING OR GRINDING SPENT NEAT OILS
Plant
1
2
3
Water
L/kkg
NR
NR
NR
Use
gal/ton
NR
NR
NR
Percent
Recycle
P
P
NR
Wastewater
L/kkg
17.07
564.4
NR
Discharge*
gal/ton
4.09
135.4
NR
Average
NR
NR
290.7
69.72
 P - Periodic discharge
NR - Data not reported

*Discharge from operation.
                               796

-------
                           Table V-143

      REFRACTORY METALS SAWING OR GRINDING SPENT EMULSIONS
 Plant

   1
   2
   1
   1
   3
   3
   4
   1
   5
   6
   7
   7
   7
   5
   5
   8

Average
    Water Use         Percent
L/kkg     gal/ton     Recycle
                    Wastewater Discharge*
                      L/kkg     gal/ton
NR
168.8
NR
NR
NR
NR
136.6
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
40.47
NR
NR
NR
NR
32.75
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
100
NR
NR
P
P
0.0
P
P
P
NR
NR
NR
P
P
NR
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.17
20.85
136.6
1,027
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.52
5.00
32.75
246.3
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
 152.7
36.6
296.6
71.14
 P - Periodic discharge
NR - Data not reported

*Discharge from operation.
                              797

-------
                                                 Table V-144

                            REFRACTORY METALS SAWING OR GRINDING SPENT  EMULSIONS
                                       RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
                 Pol 1utant
      Toxic Pollutants
                                       Stream
                                        Code
                                                                     Concentrations  (mg/1)
                                                                 Source
lO
00
117.  beryl 1ium


118.  cadmium


119.  chromium (total)


120.  copper


121.  cyanide


122.  lead


124.  nickel          '.


128.  zi'nc


Nonconvent ional Pol 1utants

Fluoride
BG-1
BQ-1

BG-1
BQ-1

BG-1
BQ-1

BG-1
BQ-1

BG-1
BQ-1

BG-1
BQ-1

BG-1
BQ-1

BG-1
BQ-1
                                               BG-1
                                               BQ-1
<0.002
<0.010

<0.001
<0.010

 0.030
<0.010

<0.100
 1 .5

 0.020
 0.38

<0.010
<0.010

 0.200
 2.000

 0.030
 0.400
                                                                      2 .60
                                                                      1 1 .50
      Molybdenum
                                               BG-1
                                                                     <0.03

-------
                                           •  Table V-144 (Continued)

                             REFRACTORY METALS SAWING OR GRINDING SPENT EMULSIONS
                                        RAW. WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
                  Pollutant
                                              Stream
                                               Code
                                                                  Source
                                                               Concentrations  (mg/1)
                                                                            Day 1
                                                                              Day
       Nonconventional  Po1 1 utants (Continued)
       Tungsten
                                         BQ-1
                                         BG-1
 <1 .0
390.0
VO
Conventional Pol Iutants

Oi1  and Grease

Total Suspended Solids (TSS)


pH
                                                BQ-1

                                                BQ-1
                                                BG-1

                                                BQ-1
 47.000

486.000
  5.000

  8.67
       1.   No analyses were performed on the following toxic pollutants:
       1-116, 123 and 125-127.

-------
                           Table V-145

              REFRACTORY METALS SAWING OR GRINDING
                      CONTACT COOLING WATER
 Plant

   1
   1
   1
   2
   3
   4
   5
   2
   6
       Water Use
   L/kkg     gal/ton
     NR
     NR
     NR
     NR
  6,255
  9,621
 56,890
 24,390
119,100
Average  43,250
    NR
    NR
    NR
    NR
 1,500
 2,307
13,640
 5,848
28,570

10,370
Percent
Recycle

  100
  100
  100
   P
  0.0
  0.0
 80.0
  0.0
  0.0
                        Wastewater Discharge*
                          L/kkg     gal/ton
      0.00
      0.00.
      0.00
    135.5
  6,255
  9,621
 11,380
 24,390
119,100

 28,480
     0.00
     0.00
     0.00
    32.49
 1,500
 2,307
 2,729
 5,848
28,570

 6,831
 P - Periodic discharge
NR - Data not reported

*Discharge from operation.
                              800

-------
                        Table V-146

REFRACTORY METALS SAWING OR GRINDING CONTACT COOLING WATER
              RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
Toxic
1 1 .
15.
23.
29.
34.
CO 39'
o
44.
55.
57.
58.
63.
65.
66.
68.
69.
Pol lutant
Pol lutants
1 , 1 , 1-trichloroethane
1,1,2, 2-tet rachl oroethane
chl orof orm
1 , 1-dichloroethylene
2 ,4-dimethy 1 pheno 1
f 1 uoranthene
methylene chloride
naphthalene
2-ni trophenol
4-ni trophenol
N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine
pheno 1
bis(2-ethylhexyl ) phthalate
di-n-butyl phthalate
di-n-octyl phthalate
Stream
Code
M-12
N-4
M-12
N-4
M-12
N-4
M-12
- N-4 -
M-12
N-4
M-12
N-4
M-12
N-4
.M-12
N-4
M-12
N-4
M-12
N-4
M-12
N-4
M-12
N-4
M-12
N-4
M-12
N-4
M-12
N-4
Samp! e
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
: 1
1
1.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
. I 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Concentrations
Source Day 1
0.011
ND
ND
ND .
0.016
0.015
ND
: ND :•
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.002
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.010
.ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
<0.010
ND
ND '
ND
ND
(mg/1)
Day 2
0. 177
<0.010
ND
<0 . 0 1 0
ND
<0.010
<0.010
ND
0.071
ND
0.213
0.034
<0..010
<0.010
<0.010

Day 3
0.017
ND
ND
ND
0.013
ND
0.005
0.005
ND
ND
ND .
0.058
0.001
ND
ND

-------
                                           Table V-146 (Continued)

                         REFRACTORY METALS SAWING OR GRINDING CONTACT COOLING WATER
                                       RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
00
O
NJ
           Pollutant

Toxic Pollutants (Continued)


 78.  anthracene


 84.  pyrene


104.  gamma-BHC

114.  antimony


115.  arsenic


117.  beryllium


118.  cadmium


119.  chromium (total)


120.  copper


121.  cyanide (total)


122.  lead .   ..    .   .


123.  mercury


124.  nickel


125. .selenium.  . .   -  .  -


126.  si 1ver
Stream Sample
Code Type
M-12 1
N-4 1
M-12 - 1
N-4 1
N-4 1
M-12 1
N-4 1
M-12 1
N-4 1
M-12 1
N-4 1
M-12 1
N-4 - 1
M-12 1
N-4 1
M-12 1
N-4 1
M-12 1
N-4 1
M-12 1
N-4 1
M-12 1
N-4 1
M-12 1
N-4 . 1
-M-12 1
N-4 1
M-12 1
N-4 1
Concentrations (mg/1)
Source Day
ND
ND
ND
ND
<0.005
<0.010
<0.002
<0.010
<0.001
<0.005
" <0.0005
<0.020
<0.001
<0.020
0.10
<0.050
0.030
<0.02
0.003
- <0.050
0.084
<0.0002
<0.0002
<0.050
<0. 1 1
<0.010 . - -
<0.008
<0.010
<0.002
i 1 Day 2 Day 3
ND
<0.010
ND
<0.010
ND
<0.010
0.040
<0.010
0.016
<0.005
<0.0005
0.020
0.040
0.080
0.86
0.050
0.21
<0.02
2.0
.. . • 
-------
                                           Table V-146 (Continued)
                         REFRACTORY METALS SAWING OR GRINDING CONTACT COOLING WATER
                                       RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
00
O
U)
           Pollutant

Toxi c Pol 1utants  (Continued)


127.  thallium


128.  zinc


Nonconventional Pollutants -

Acidity

Alkalinity

Aluminum

Ammonia Nitrogen

Barium

Boron

Calci um

Chemical Oxygen Demand  (COD)

Chloride

Cobalt

Fluoride

Iron

Magnesium

Manganese

Molybdenum


Phenolics
Stream
Code
M-12 .
N-4
M-12
N-4
M-12
M-12
M-12
M-12
M-12
M-12
M-12
M-12
M-12
M-12
M-12
M-12
M-12
M-12
M-12
N-4
M-12
N-4
Sampl e
Concentrations (mg/1)
Type Source Day 1 Day 2
1 <0.010
1 <0.001 0.007
1 <0.
1 0.
1 " <1
1 100
1 0
1 <0.
1 <0.
1 <0.
1 36.
1 <5
1 10
1 <0.
1 0.-
"1 	 <0.
1 11.
1 <0.
1 <0.
1 0.
1 <0.
1 0.
010
20 0.90


.200
1
050 .
100
5


050
85
050 	 ~ ~ 	
3
050
050
10 5,470
005 V
0017 0.019

Day 3
<0.010
0.240
<1
56
1 .20
0.50
, <0.050
<0. 100
78.2
58
35
<0.050
1 .5
1.3-. 0 '-
12.1
0.050
<0. 100
<0.005

-------
                                           Table V-146  U'loiTliuiHtO

                        REFRACTORY METALS  SAW1NU OR GRINDING  CONTACT  COOt-INCi WATCR
                                      RAW  WASTEWATEK SAMPLING DATA
00
o
            Pollutant

 Nonconvent-ional  Pol lutants (Continued)


 Phosphate

 Sodium

 Sulfate

 Tin

 Ti tani urn

 Total  Dissolved  Solids (TDS)


 Total  Organic Carbon (TOO

 Total  Solids (TS)

 Vanadi urn

 Yttrium


 Conventional Pollutants

 Oi1  and Grease


.Total  Suspended  Solids (TSS)


 pH  (standard units) ~ ~
Stream
Code
M-12
M-12
M-12
M-12
M-12
M-12
N-4
M-12
M-12
M-12
M-12
M-12
' N-4
M-12
N-4
-• M-12
N-4
Sample Concentrations (mg/1)
Type Source Day 1 Day 2
1 <4
1 5.20
1 43
1 <0.050
1 <0.050
1 270
1 360 ' 25,000
1 <1
1 280 1
1 <0.050
1 <0.050
1 3
1 14 7.3
1 14
1 <1 240
1 7.30
1 7.4 5.7

Day 3
<4
6.00
200
<0.200
0.050
580
4
,200
<0.050
<0.050
2.9
380
"' 6.40
       1.  Toxic pollutants 89-113 were analyzed  in  this  waste  stream.

       2.  The following toxic pollutants were not detected  in  this  waste  stream:   1-10,  12-14,
           16-22, 24-28, 30-33, 35-38, 40-43, 45-54,  56.  59-62.  64.  67.  70-77.  79-83.  85-103.
           and 105-113.
       3.  No analyses were performed on the following  toxic  pollutants:   116  and  129.

-------
                           Table V-147
           REFRACTORY METALS SAWING OR GRINDING RINSE
Plant
1
1
Water
L/kkg
135
NR
Use
gal/ton
32.5
NR
Percent
Recycle
0.0
0.0
Wastewater
L/kkg
135
NR
Discha
gal/t
32.5
NR
Average     135         32.5                 135    '.     32.5
NR - Data not reported
*Discharge from operation.
                              805

-------
                           Table V-148

       REFRACTORY METALS DYE PENETRANT TESTING WASTEWATER
 Plant

   1

Average
    Water Use
L/kkg     gal/ton
  77.6

  77.6
18.6

18.6
Percent
Recycle

  0.0.
                   'Wastewater Discharge*
                      L/kkg     gal/ton
77.6

77.6
18.6

18.6
*Discharge from operation.
                              806

-------
                    Table V-149

REFRACTORY METALS DYE PENETRANT. TESTING WASTEWATER
           RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
Tox i c
1 1 .
13.
23.
29.
35.
39.
44.
00
0 55.
-J
56.
58.
60.
62.
65.
66.
69.
77.
78.
80.
81.
85.
95.
104.
Pol lutant
Pol 1 utants
1 , 1 , 1 -trichl oroethans
1 ,'1 -di ch 1 oroethane
chl orof orm
1 ,.1-dichloroethylene
2, 4-dini.t rotol uene
f 1 uoranthene
me.thylene chloride
naphthalene
ni t robenzene
4-ni t rophenol
4,6-dinitro-o-cresol
N~ni t rosodi pheny 1 amine
phenol
bis(2-ethy Ihexyl ) phthalate
di-n-octyl phthalate
acenaphthy 1 ene
anthracene (a)
f 1 uorene
phenanthrene (a)
tetrachloroethylene
al pha-endosul f an
gamma-BHC
Stream
Code
N-5
N-S
N-5
N-5
. N-5 . - .
N-5
N-5
N-5
N-5
N-5
N-5
N-5
N-5
N-5
. N-5
N-5
N-5
N-5
N-5
• N-5
N-5
N-5
Sample Concentrations (mg/1)
Type Source
1 ND
1 ND
1 0.015
1 ND
1 . . . ND . -
1 ' ND
1 ND
1 ND
1 ND
1 ' 0.010
1 ND
1 ND
1 ND
1 -. <0.010
1 ND
1 ND
1 ND
1 ND
1 ND
1 ND
1 ND
1 ' <0.005
Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
0.170
<0
<0
<0
.0
0
<0
0
0

0
0
0
0
<0
0
0
0
" 0
<0

<0
.010
.010
.010
..143
.284
.010
. 134
.019
ND
.039
.039
.049
.019
.010
.021
.049
.021 .
.049
.010
**
.005

-------
               Table V-149 (Continued)

REFRACTORY METALS DYE PENETRANT TESTING WASTEWATER
           RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
Toxic
1 14.
115.
1 17.
118.
119.
120.
CD
g
122.
123.
124.
125.
126.
127.
128.
Pol lutant
Pollutants (Continued)
ant imony
arsenic
beryl 1 ium
cadmium
chromium (total )
copper
cyanide ( total )
lead
mercury
ni ckel
selenium
si 1 ver
thai 1 ium
zinc
Stream
Code
N-5
N-5
N-5
N-5
N-5
N-5
N-5
N-5
N-5
N-5
N-5
N-5
N-5
N-5
Sample
Concentrations (mg/1)
Type Source Da
1 <0.002
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
1 - <0
1 0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 0
.001
.0005
.001
.10
.030
.003
.084
.0002
.11
.008
.002
.001
.20
y 1 Day 2 Day 3
<0.002
<0
<0
<0
3
0
<0
0
<0
1
<0
<0
<0
1
.001
.0005
.001
.7
.28
.001
.055
.0002
.6
.008
.002
.001
.2
Nonconvent i onal Pollutants
Molybdenum
Phenol
Total
ics
Dissolved Solids (TDS)
N-5
N-5
N-5,
1 0
1 0
1 360
.10
.0017

0
0
440
.50
.025


-------
                                          Table  V-149  (Continued)

                           REFRACTORY  METALS  DYE PENETRANT  TESTING WASTEWATER
                                      RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING  DATA
                 Pollutant
                                             Stream
                                              Code
                                                               Concentrations (mg/1)
                                                           Source    Day 1    Day 2
      Conventional  Pollutants

      Oi1  and  Grease

      Total  Suspended Solids  (TSS)

     . pH  (standard  units)
                                        N-5        1

                                        N-5     -   1

                                        N-5        1
                                                           14
                                                            7.4
72

22

 7.5
00
o
ID
(a)  Reported together.

**Present, but not quantifiable.

1.  Toxic pollutants 89-113 were  analyzed in this waste stream.

2.  The following toxic pollutants were not detected in this waste stream:  1-10, 12,
    14-22, 24-28, 30-34,'36-38, 40-43,  45-54,  57. 59,  61,  63,  64,  67,  68,  70-76, 79,
    82-84, .86-94, 96-103,  and 105-113.
      3.   No  analyses  were  performed  on  the  following  toxic  pollutants:   116 and 129.

-------
                           Table V-150

         REFRACTORY METALS EQUIPMENT CLEANING WASTEWATER
 Plant

   1
   1
   1
   2
   2
   3
Average   4,435
    Water Use
L/kkg     gal/ton
32.36
13.9
66.1
2,673
2,687
21,140
7.76
3.34
15.8
641.0
644.2
5,070
Percent
Recycle

  100
  0.0
  0.0
  0.0
  0.0
  0.0
  Wastewater Discharge*
    L/kkg     gal/ton
          1,064
     0.0
    13.9
    66.1
 2,673
 2,687
21,140

 5,316
    0.0
    3.34
   15.8
  641.0
  644.3 ,
5,070

1,275
*Discharge from operation.
                              810

-------
                                                  Table V-151
                              REFRACTORY METALS EQUIPMENT CLEANING WASTEWATER
                                        RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
00
           Pollutant

Toxic Pol 1utants


117. . beryl 1i urn

118.  cadmi urn

119.  chromium (total)

120.  copper

121.  cyani de

122.  lead

124.  nickel

128.  Zinc


Nonconventi onal  Pol 1utants

Fluoride

Molybdenum
Stream Sarnpl e .
Code Type
BG-2 1
BG-2 1 '
BG-2 1
BG-2 1
BG-2 . 1 ,
BG-2 1
BG-2 1
BG-2 1
BG-2 1
BG-2 1
Concentrations (mg/U
Source Day
<0.
0.
0.
1 .
- - o:
0.
0.
0.
2.
<0.
1 Day 2 Day 3
002
001
070
400
340
600
050
500
600
03

-------
                                            Table V-151 (Continued)

                              REFRACTORY METALS EQUIPMENT CLEANING WASTEWATER
                                       RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
                 Pollutant
                                             Stream
                                              Code
        Sample
         Type
                                                                     Concentrations  (mg/1)
Source    Day 1     Day 2    Day 3
      Nonconventiona1 Pollutants  (Continued)
      Tungsten
                                               BG-2
                                                                             2.40
00
M
CO
      ConventionaI Po1lutants

      Oi1 and Grease

      Total Suspended  Solids  (TSS)
BG-2

BG-2
           5.00

          64.00
       1.  No analyses were  performed  on  the  following  toxic  pollutants:
       1-116, 123 and  125-127.

-------
                         ;  Table V-152
       REFRACTORY METALS MISCELLANEOUS WASTEWATER SOURCES
Plant
1
2
3
Water
L/kkg
NR
3,459
NR
Use
gal/ton
NR
829.6
NR
Percent
Recycle
100
0
NR
Wastewater
L/kkg
0.00 :
3,459
NR
Discharge*
gal/ton
0.00
829.6
NR
Average   3,459
829.6
3,459
829.6
NR - Data not reported
*Discharge from operation.
                              813

-------
                           Table V-153

      REFRACTORY METALS WET AIR POLLUTION CONTROL SLOWDOWN
 Plant

   1
   2
   1
   3
   4
   5
   6
   7
   8
         Water Use
     L/kkg     gal/ton
       NR
       NR
   14,330
    2,622
    6,672
2,502,000
       NR
       NR
       NR
Average 631,400
     NR
     NR
  3,436
    628.8
  1,600
600,000
     NR
     NR
     NR

151,400
Percent
Recycle

  100
   P
 93.2
  0.0
  0.0
                         Wastewater Discharge*
                           L/kkg     gal/ton
    0.00
    8.32
  977.8
2,622
6,672
  0.0 2,502,000
  0.0        NR
  0.0        NR
   P         NR

        502,500
      0.00
      2.00
    234.5
    628.8
  1,600
600,000
     NR
     NR
     NR

120,500
 P - Periodic discharge
NR - Data not reported

*Discharge from operation.
                               814

-------
                     Table.V-154

REFRACTORY METALS WET AIR POLLUTION CONTROL SLOWDOWN
           RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA

Po 1 1 utant
Stream
Code
Sample
Type
Concentrations (mg/1)
Source
Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
Toxic Pollutants ' -•
1 1 .
23.
44.
1 14.
115.
00 "7-
H
(Jl
118.
119.
120.
121 .
122.
123.
1 24 .
125.
126.
127.
1,1,1-trichl oroe thane
chl orof orm
methylene chloride
ant imony
arsenic •
beryl 1 i um
cadmium
chromium (total )
copper
cyanide (total )
lead
mercury
nickel
sel enium
si 1 ver
thai Hum
M-1 1
•M-1 1
M-1 1
M-1 1
Z-2
- M-1 1
Z-2
'M-1 1
Z-2
M-1 1
Z-2
M-1 1
Z-2
M-11
Z-2
M-1 1
M-1 1
Z-2
M-1 1
Z-2
M-"l 1
Z-2
M-1 1
Z-2
M-11
Z-2
M-1 1
Z-2
1
1
1 .
1
1
• . 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 .
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
<0
0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
0
<0
0
<0
<0
0
<0
<0
<0
0
<0
0
<0
0
<0
<0
.011
.016
.002
.010
.0004
.010
.001
.005
.01
.020
.01
.020
.038
.050
.013
.02
.050
.097
.0002
.005
.050
.038
.010
.0004
.010
.0005
.010
.001
0

0
0
0.0005
- 	 
-------
00
H
                     REFRACTORY
           Pollutant

Toxic Pollutants (Continued)


128. zinc


Nonconventional Pollutants

Acidity



Alkalinity



Aluminum



Ammonia  Nitrogen

Barium



Boron



 Calcium


 Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD)


 Chloride

 Cobalt



 Columbi urn

 Fluoride



 Iron



 Magnesi urn
                                         Table V-J54  (Continued)

                                      METALS WET AIR POLLUTION  CONTROL SLOWDOWN
                                      RAW WAST6WATER SAMPLING DATA
Stream Sample
Code Type
M-11 1
Z-2 1
M-11 1
Z-2 1
M-l 1 1
Z-2 1
M-11 1
Z-2 1
M-11 1
M-11 1
Z-2 1
M-11 1
Z-2 -1
M-1 1 1
Z2 1
M-11 1
M-11 1
M-1 1 1
Z-2 1
Z-2 1
M-11 1
Z-2 1
M-1 1 1
. Z-2 1
M-11 1
Z-2

Oon«~»nt rat ions (mg/1)
Source Day 1 Uay 1 pay J .
0.080 0.120
<0.25 0.046
<1
<10
100
69
0.
0.
<0.
'<0.
0.
<0.
0.
36.
79
<5
10
<1
<10
80
4,400
200 0.300
11 .5.7
! 0.67
050 <0.050
04 0.02
100 0.200
5 18
5 29.9
3.5
47
17
<0.050 <0.050
<0
.01 <0.01
ND ND
0
0
<0
0
11
8
.85 	 130- -
.2 1,050
.050 0.150
.24 0.8
.3 14.6
.0 0.35

-------
               Table V-154 (Continued)

REFRACTORY METALS 'WET AIR POLLUTION CONTROL SLOWDOWN
           RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
Pol lutant
Stream
Code
Sampl e
Concentrations (mg/1)
Source Day 1
Day 2 Day 3
Nonconvent ional Pollutants (Continued)
Manganese
Mol ybdenum
Phenol i cs
Phosphate
Sodi um
Sulfate
Tantal um
00
1-4 Tin
-J
Ti tani um
Total Dissolved Solids (TDS)
Total Organic Carbon (TOC)
Total Solids (TS)
Vanadium
Yttrium •" " ~ ......
Zirconium
M-1 1
Z-2
M-1 1
Z-2
M-11
M-1 1
M-1 1
Z-2
M-1 1
Z-2
M-1 1
Z-2
M-1 1
Z-2
M-1 1
Z-2
M-1 1
M-1 1
Z-2
M-1 1
Z-2
	 'M-11 ' '
Z-2
Z-2
1
1
1
1
1 '
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
' ' V
1
1 -
<0
0
<0
<0
<0
<4
5
27
43
<0
<0
<0
<0
270
110
<1
280
390
<0
<0
<0
<0
0
.050
.012 0.11-
.050
.03 <0.03
.005

.20
7,600 ..

ND ND
.050
.28 <0.28
.050
.25 <0.25
170

200
.050
.02 <0.02
.050 : " '
.25 <0.25
.26 1.1
<0.050
<0
<0
<4
154
41
<0
<0
540
50
780
<0
"" <0

. 050 .
.005



. 100
.050



.050
'.050


-------
                                          Table V-154 (Continued)

                           REFRACTORY METALS WET AIR POLLUTION CONTROL SLOWDOWN
                                      RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
                 Pol lutant
Stream
 Code
Sample
 Type
                                                                     Concentrations (ma/1)
                                                                 Source    Day 1     Day 2    Day 3
00
H
00
      Conventional  Pollutants

      Oi 1  and Grease

      Total  Suspended Solids (TSS)


      pH (standard units)
 M-1 1
M-1 1
Z-2
M-1 1
Z-2
1 14
1 100
1 7.30
1 6

20

12
150

6.60

      1.  The following toxic pollutants were not detected in this waste stream:  1-10, 12-22,
          24-43, and 45-88.

      2.  No analyses were performed on the following toxic pollutants:  89-113, 116, and 129.

-------
                           Table V-155

                TITANIUM ROLLING SPENT NEAT OILS
 Plant

   1
   2

Average
    Water Use
L/kkg     gal/ton
  NR
  NR

  NR
NR
NR

NR.
Percent
Recycle

  100
  NR
                    Wastewater Discharge*
                      L/kkg     gal/ton
0.00 ,
0.00

0.00
0.00
0.00

0.00
NR - Data not reported

*Discharge from operation.
                               819

-------
                           Table V-156

             TITANIUM ROLLING CONTACT COOLING WATER

Plant
1
2
3
4
Water
L/kkg
NR
4,884
NR
NR
Use
gal/ton
NR
1,171
NR
NR
Percent
Recycle
0.0
0.0 •
P
100
Wastewater
L/kkg
NR
4,884 1
NR
NR
Discharg-
gal/ton1
NR
,171
NR
NR
Average   4,884
1,171
4,884
1,171
 P - Periodic discharge
NR - Data not reported

*Discharge from operation.
                               820

-------
                                                                         1
                           Table V-157

                TITANIUM DRAWING SPENT NEAT OILS
 Plant

   1
   2

Average
    Water Use
L/kkg     gal/ton
  NR
  NR

  NR
NR
NR

NR
Percent
Recycle

  NR
  NR
                    Wastewater Discharge*
                      L/kkg,     gal/ton
NR
NR

NR
NR
NR

NR
NR - Data not reported

*Discharge from operation.
                               821

-------
Average
                           Table V-158
               TITANIUM EXTRUSION  SPENT NEAT  OILS
Plant
1
2
3
4
5
Water
L/kkg
NR
NR
NR
3.56
NR
Use
gal/ton
NR
NR
NR
0.85
NR
Percent
Recycle
NR
0.0
0.0
0.0
NR
Wastewater
L/kkg
0.00
0.00 :
0.00
0.00
0.00
Discharge*
gal/ton
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.56
0.85
0.00
0.00
NR - Data not reported
*Discharge from operation.
                               822

-------
                           Table V-159




               TITANIUM EXTRUSION SPENT EMULSIONS
Plant
1
Average
Water
L/kkg
71.90
71.90
Use
gal/ton
17.20
17.20
Percent
Recycle
, 0.0 .

Wastewater
L/kkg
71.90
71.90
Dischar
gal/to
17.20
17.20
*Discharge from operation,
                              823

-------
                           Table V-160

        TITANIUM EXTRUSION PRESS HYDRAULIC FLUID LEAKAGE
 Plant

   1

Average
    Water Use
L/kkg     gal/ton
 178.3

 178.3
42.77

42.77
Percent
Recycle

.  0.0
                    Wastewater Discharge*
                      L/kkg     gal/ton
178.3

178.3
42.77

42.77
*Discharge from operation.
                               824

-------
                                                 Table V-161


                            TITANIUM EXTRUSION PRESS HYDRAULIC  FLUID  LEAKAGE
                                      RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
                 Pol 1utant


      Noneonventi onal  Pollutants



      Fluoride



      Convent i onal  Pa 11utants


      Oi1  and Grease


      Total Suspended  Solids (TSS)


      pH                      " - " "
                                             Stream
                                              Code
AK-1    .   3






AK-1       3


AK-1       3


AK-1       3
                      Concentrations  (mg/1)
                                                                  Source
Day 1





 2.30





10.0


 7.0


 6.8
                                      Day
09
K)
cn

-------
                           Table V-162

                TITANIUM FORGING SPENT LUBRICANTS
 Plant

   1
   2
   1
   3
   4
   5
   6
   7

Average
    Water Use
L/kkg     gal/ton
   2.10
  NR
   6.80
  NR
  NR
  NR
 339.4
  NR

 116.1
 0.50
NR
 1.63
NR
NR
NR
81.37
NR

27.83
Percent
Recycle

  0.0
  0.0
  0.0
  0.0
  NR
  0.0
  0.0
  NR
                    Wastewater Discharge*
                      L/kkg     gal/ton
 0.00
 0.00
 0.00
 0.00
 0.00
 0.00
 0.00
NR

 0.00
 0.00
 0.00
 0.00
 0.00
 0.00
 0.00
 0.00
NR

 0.00
NR - Data not reported

*Discharge from operation.
                               826

-------
                           Table V-163             !




             TITANIUM FORGING CONTACT COOLING WATER
Plant
1
2
3
4
Water
L/kkg
5,252
417.0
323
NR
Use-
gal/ton
1,259
100.0
77.5
NR
Percent
Recycle
95'. 0
0.0
0.0
NR
Wastewater
L/kkg
245.1 :
417.0 •
323
NR
Discharge*
gal/ton
58.77
100.0
77.5
NR
Average   1,997
479.0
328.4
78.76
NR - Data not reported



*Discharge from operation.
                               827

-------
                           Table V-164

         TITANIUM FORGING EQUIPMENT CLEANING WASTEWATER
 Plant

   1
   1

Average
    Water Use
L/kkg     gal/ton
  13.92
  66.10

  40.01
 3.34
15.86

 9.60
Percent
Recycle

  0.0
  0.0
                    Wastewater Discharge*
                      L/kkg     gal/ton
13.92
66.10

40.01
 3.34
15.86

 9.60
*Discharge from operation.
                               828

-------
                         ,  Table V-165

         TITANIUM FORGING PRESS HYDRAULIC FLUID LEAKAGE
 Plant

   1
   2
     Water Use
 L/kkg     gal/ton
1,010
   NR
Average   1,010
242.3
 NR

242.3
Percent
Recycle

  0.0
  NR
                     Wastewater Discharge*
                       L/kkg     gal/ton
1,010
   NR

1,010
242.3
 NR

242.3
NR - Data not reported

^Discharge from operation.
                               829

-------
                           Table V-166
             TITANIUM TUBE REDUCING SPENT LUBRICANTS
Plant
1
2
3
2
Water
L/kkg
2,356
1,050
7,359
NR
Use
gal/ton
565.0
251.9
1,765
NR
Percent
Recycle
0.0
0.0
0.0
NR
Wastewater
L/kkg
294.3 :
1,050
7,359 ' 1
NR
Discharg
gal/ton
70.57
251.9
,765
NR
Average   3,588
860.6
2,901
695.7
NR - Data not reported
^Discharge from operation.
                              830

-------
                                                Table V-167

                                   TITANIUM TUBE REDUCING SPENT LUBRICANT
                                        RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
00
Pol lutant
Toxic Pol lutants
117. Beryl I i urn
118. Cadmium
119. Chromium (total)
120. Copper
121 . Cyanide
122. Lead •.-•:.
124. NVckel
128. Zinc
Nonconventi onal Pollutants
A 1 umi num
Ammonia (as N)
Fl ouri de
I ron
Titanium
Vanadium
Convent io.nal . Po 1.1 utants _ . . .
Oi 1 and Grease
Total Suspended Solids (TSS)
pH
Stream
Code
AX-1
AX-1
AX-1
AX-1
AX-1
AX- 1
AX-1
AX-1
AX-1
AX-1
AX-1
AX-1
AX- 1
AX-1
AX-1
AX-1
AX-1
Sample Concentrations (mg/1)
Type Source Da
1 <0.
1 - <0.
1 - <0.
1 - 4.
1 - <0.
-.- i- -•• - 
-------
                           Table V-168

          TITANIUM HEAT TREATMENT CONTACT COOLING WATER
               Water Use
 Plant     L/kkg     gal/ton
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
110,840
NR
214.3
1,747
2,067
3,233
12,530
23,070
NR
NR
26,580
NR
51.40
418.9
495.7
775.4
3',006
5,531
NR
NR
            Percent
            Recycle

             99.9
              NR
              0.0
              0.0
              0.0
              0.0
              0.0
              0.0
              0.0
              NR
 Wastewater  Discharge*
   L/kkg      gal/ton
13 .
19.
214.
1,747
2,067
3,233
12,530
23,070
NR
NR
58
25
3







3.26
4.62
51.40
418.9
495.7
775.4
3,006
5,531
NR.
NR
Average  21,957
5,265
5,362
1,286
NR - Data not reported

*Discharge from operation,
                               832

-------
                                               Table V-169

                               TITANIUM HEAT TREATMENT CONTACT COOLING WATER
                                       RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
00
U)
'CO
           Pollutant

Toxi c Pol 1utants


117.  beryl 1i urn




118.  cadmi um




119.  chromium (total)




120.  copper




121.  cyanide

122.  lead




124.  nickel




128.  zinc
                                            Stream
                                             Code
AK-2
AW-1
BW-2
BK-2
AK-2
AW- 1
BW-2
BK-2
AK-2
AW-1
BW-2
BK-2
AK-2
AW-1
BW-2
BK-2
3
1


' 3
1


3
.1


3
1


                                              AW-1

                                              AK-2
                                              AW-1
                                              BW-2
                                              BK-2

                                              AK-2
                                              AW-1
                                              BW-2
                                              BK-2

                                              AK-2
                                              AW-1
                                              BW-2
                                              BK-2
                                                               Concentrations (mg/1)
                                                                Source
<0.020
<0.100
 0.006
<0.001

<0.010
<0.050
 0.033
<0.005

<0.020
<0.010
 0.460
 0.010

 0.420
<0.050
11.000
 0.033

 0.036

<0.020
<0.100
 0.510
<0.050

<0.020
 0. 100
 1 .300
 0.360

 0.170
<0.050
 6.700
 0.008

-------
                                    Table V-169  (Continued)

                          TITANIUM  HEAT TREATMENT CONTACT  COOLING WATER
                                 RAW  WASTEWATER  SAMPLING  DATA
Pol lutant
Nonconventional Pol lutants
al uminum
ammonia
cobal t
flouride
i ron
03
OJ
magnesium
manganese
mo 1 ybdenum
t i tanium-
vanadi urn
Stream
Code

AW-1
BW-2
BK-2
AW-1
BW-2
BK-2
AW-1
AW-1
BW-2
BK-2
BW-2
BK-2
BW-2
BK-2
BW-2
BK-2
AK-2
AW-1
BW-2
BK-2
AW-1
BW-2
BK-2
Sample Concentrations (mg/1)
Type Source Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
1 - <1.00
24.00
0.096
1 - <0.100
0.330
0.009
1 - 1.200
1 - 0.340
440 . 0
0.960
14.00
7.80
6.400
0.017
0.450
0.069
3 - <0.050
1 - 2.000
0.810
0.012
1 - <0.200
0.600
0.061-
zi rconium
                                         AK-2
                                                                    <0.100

-------
00
u>
Ul
                                           Table V-169 (Continued)

                                TITANIUM HEAT TREATMENT CONTACT COOLING WATER
                                        RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
                 Pol 1utant
                                             Stream
                                              Code
                      Concentrations  (mg/1)
                                                                 Source
                            Day "1
                                                                                    Day
      Conventional  Pollutants

      oi1  and Grease

      total  Suspended Solids (TSS)

      pH
AW-1

AW-1

AW-1
  1.10

390.0

  7.4
      1.   No analyses were performed on the following toxic pollutants:
      1-116, 123 and 125-127.   •                             '

-------
                           Table V-170

             TITANIUM SURFACE TREATMENT SPENT BATHS
                  Plant
                Average
Wastewater Discharge*
 L/kkg     gal/ton
1
2
3
4
5
6
7.
8
9
10
5
11
12
10
13
14
11
10
14
15
16 '
14
11
17
18
11
19
11
20
21
22
21
0.00
7.15
9.13
27.73
37.23
39.89
50.73
52.29
100.1
103.3
111.2
208.0
219.4
239.7
255.4
492.3
500.8
694.8
881.9
1,187
2,502
5,466
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.00
1.71
2.19
• 6.65
8.93
9.57
12.17
12.54
24.00
24.78
26.67
49.88
52.62
57.47
61.25
. 118.1
120.1
166.6
• 211.5
284.6
600.0
1,311
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
599.4
NR - Data not reported

*Discharge from operation.
143.7
                              836

-------
                                                  Table V-171 .

                                    TITANIUM SURFACE TREATMENT  SPENT BATHS
                                        RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA*
00
CO
           Pol 1utant

Toxic Pollutants

114.  antimony .


115.  arsenic


117..  beryl 1 i urn


1 18.  cadmium


119.  chromium (total)


120.  copper


122.  lead


123.  mercury


124.  nickel


125.  seleni urn


126.  silver
Stream
Code
L-2
L-4
L-2
L-4
L-2
L-4
: L-2
L-4
L-2
L-4
L-2
L-4
L-2
L-4
L-2'
L-4
L-2
L-4
L-2
L-4
L-2
-L-4
Sample Concentrations (mg/1)
Type Source . Da^
1 <0.010
1 <0.010
1 <0.010
1 <0.010
1 <0.005
1 <0.005 -
1 <0.020
1 <0.020
1 <0.020
1 <0.020
1 <0.050
1 <0.050
1 <0.050
1 <0.050
1 <0.0002
1 <0.0002
1 <0.050
1 <0.050
1 <0.100
1 <0. 100
1 <0.010
	 1 <0.010
I 1 Day 2
<0. 10
1 .6.0
<5.00
<2.00
18.0
5.00
65.0
<0.002
5.00
<1 .00
<0. 10
Day 3
0.30
1 .80
<5.00
<0.20
12.8
4.00
214
<0.002
10.0
<1 .00
<0. 10

-------
                                          Table V-171 (Continued)

                                  TITANIUM SURFACE TREATMENT SPENT BATHS
                                      RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA*
00
W
00
           Pollutant

Toxic Pollutants (Continued)

127.  thallium


128.  zinc


Nonconventional Pollutants

Acidity


Alkalinity


A 1uminum


Barium


Boron


Calci urn


Chloride


Cobalt


Fluoride
Stream
Code
L-2
L-4
L-2
L-4
L-2
L-4
L-2
L-4
L-2
L-4
L-2
L-4
L-2
L-4
L-2
L-2
L-4
L-2
L-4
L-2
L-4
Samp 1 e
1
1
- 1
1
1
1
1
1
. 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Concentrations (mg/1)
Source
<0.010
<0.010
<0.020
<0.020
;;
250
250
0.200
0.200
0. 100
0. 100
<0. 100
<0. 100
77.6
77.6
50
50
<0.050
<0.050
1 . 1
1 . 1
Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
<0.40
0.20
166
<2.00
4,700
9,000
<10
< 10
5,850
2,490
5.00
1 .50
40.0
891
240
48.0
3,300
1 TO '
41 .0
98,000
74,000

-------
                                          Table V-171  (Continued)


                                  TITANIUM SURFACE TREATMENT SPENT BATHS
                                      RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA*
00
w
           Pol Iutant


Nonconventional  Pollutants  (Continued)



Iron



Magnesium



Manganese



Mo 1ybdenum



Sodium



Sulfate



Tin



Ti tani urn



Total Dissolved Solids (TDS)



Total Solids (TS)
Stream
Code
L-2
L-4
L-2
L-4
L-2
L-4
L-2
L-4
L-2
L-4
L-2
L-4
L-2
L-4
L-2
L-4
L-2
L-4
L-2
L-4
Sample Concentrations (mg/1)
Type Source
. 1 <0.050
1 . <0.050
1 34.0
1 34.0
1 <0.050
1 <0.050
1 <0.050
1 <0.050
1 19.6
1 19.6
1 21,000
1 21,000
1 <0.050
1 <0.050
1 <0.050
1 <0.050
1 390
' 1 390
- 1 400
1 400
Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
31 ,200
2,840
270
20.0
50.0
16.0
495
126
140
753
430,000
150
<50.0
<50.0
- 60,300
27,900
280,000
150,000
302,000
151 ,000

-------
                                    Table V-171 (Continued)

                            TITANIUM SURFACE TREATMENT SPENT BATHS
                                RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA*
           Pollutant
                                       Stream
                                        Code
Nonconventional Pollutants (Continued)
Sample
 Type
                                                                	Concentrations (mg/1)	
                                                                Source    Day 1     Day 2 ~  Day 3
CO
Vanadium


Yttrium


Conventional Pollutants

Total Suspended Solids (TSS)


pH (standard units)
L-2
L-4
L-2
L-4
L-2
L-4
L-2
L-4
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 7
1 7
1 7
1 7
.050
.050
.050
.050

.61
.61
                                                                          1 , 150
                                                                                  <5.00
                                                                               3,360
                                                                                   2.20
                                                                                          757
                                                                                          <0.50
                                                                                          480
                                                                                       1 .80
*Sample concentrations for Streams L-2 (Day 2) and L-4 (Day 3) have been adjusted to account
 for the ten-fold dilution of the sample which was performed on-site at the time of
 co11ecti on.

NA - Not analyzed.

1.  No analyses were performed on the following toxic pollutants:  1-113, 116, 121, and 129.

-------
 Plant
                           Table V-172

                TITANIUM SURFACE TREATMENT RINSE
    Water Use
L/kkg     gal/ton
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
7
4
10
7 '
11
12
8
13
7
14
7
15
14 4,
11
16
17
18
19
20
21
Average
NR
NR
350.
1,456
1,769
2,946
3,376
5,752
7,217
7,846
8,530
NR-
17,809
NR
33,989
50,040.
50,040
110,505
81,740
83,686
444,391
969,215
971,365
NR
NR
- NR
NR
NR
NR
360,633


2




1,
If
1,
2,

4,

8,
12,
12,
26,
19,
20,
106,
1,191,
232,






86,
NR
NR
84.0
349.2
424.2
706.5
809.5
379
731
881
046
NR
271
NR
151.
000
000
500
602
069
569
658
941
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR1
483
 P - Periodic discharge
NR - Data not reported

*Discharge from operation.
Percent
Recycle
P
P
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
P
0.0
P
0.0
0.0
0.0
40.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
P
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
Wastewater Dischar
L/kkg
100.1
222.8
350.2
1,456
1,769
2,946
3,376
5,752
7,217
7,846
8,530
10,878
17,809
19,624
33,989
50,040
50,040
66,370
79,521
83,686
444,391
662,562
971,365
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
gal/to
24.00
53.44
83.99
349.2
. 424.2
706.5
809.5
1,379
1,731
1,881
2,046
! 2 , 609
4,271
4,706
8,151
12,000
12,000
15,916
, 19,070
20,069
106,569
158,888
232,941
NR
NR
i NR
NR
NR
NR
                                         109,993
                                          26,377
                               841

-------
           Table V-173

TITANIUM SURFACE TREATMENT RINSE
  RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
                 Pollutant

      Toxic Pollutants

      114.   antimony



      115.   arsenic



      117.   bery11ium



00    118.   cadmium



      119.   chromium  (total)



      120.   copper



      121.   cyanide (total)

      122,   lead



      123.   mercury
        Stream
         Code
         L-3
         L-5
         L-6

         L-3
         L-5
         L-6

         L-3
         L-5
         L-6

         L-3
         L-5
         L-6

         L-3
         L-5
         L-6

         L-3
         L-5
         L-6

         L-7

         L-3
         L-5
         L-6

         L-3
         L-5
         L-6
           Concentrations (mg/1)
6
6
1

6
6
1

6
6
1

6
6
1

6
6
1

6
6
1
Source
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.03
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.0002
<0.0002
<0.0002
Day 1
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.050
<0.005
<0.005
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
0.060
<0.020
0.380
0. 150
<0.050
0.450
<0.02
0.550
0.050
5.90
<0.0002
<0.0002
<0.0002
Day 2
<0.010
<0.010

<0.010
<0.010

<0.005
<0.005

<0.020
<0.020

0.020
<0.020

0.050
<0.050


0.400
0.200


-------
                                          Table  V-173  (Continued)

                                     TITANIUM  SURFACE  TREATMENT RINSE
                                       RAW WASTEWATER  SAMPLING  DATA
00
£>
u>
           Pollutant

Toxic Pollutants (Continued)


124.  nickel



125.  selenium



126.  si 1ver



127.  thallium



128.  zinc



Nonconventional  Pollutants

Acidity



Alkalini ty



Aluminum
                                             Stream
                                              Code
 L-3
 L-5
 L-6

 L-3
 L-5
-L-6

 L-3
 L-5
 L-6

 L-3
 L-5
 L-6

 L-3
 L-5
 L-6
                                              L-3
                                              L-5
                                              L-6

                                              L-3
                                              L-5
                                              L-6

                                              L-3
                                              L-5
                                              L-6
                                                                Concent.rat ions (mg/1)
             6
             6
             1

             6
             6
             1

             6
             6
             1
Source
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0. 100
<0. 100

-------
                                          Table V-173  (Continued)

                                     TITANIUM  SURFACE  TREATMENT RINSE
                                       RAW WASTEWATER  SAMPLING DATA
00
           Pollutant

Nonconventional Pollutants (Continued)


Ammonia Nitrogen



Barium



Boron



Calcium



Chemical Oxygen Demand  (COD)



Chloride



Cobalt



Fluoride                   ,



Iron
                                             Stream
                                              Code
L-3
L-5
L-6

L-3
L-5
L-6

L-3
L-5
L-6

L-3
L-5
L-6

L-3
L-5
L-6

L-3
L-5
L-6

L-3
L-5
L-6

L-3.
L-5
L-6

L-3
L-5
L-6
                                                               Concentrations  (mg/1)
6
6
1

6
6
1

6
6
1

6
6
1

6
6
1

6
6
1

6
6
1

6
6
1

6
6
1
Source
0
0
0
0
0
0
<0
<0
<0
77
77
77
<1
<1
<1
50
50
50
<0
<0
<0
1
1
1
<0
<0
<0
.08
.08
.08
.100
.100
.100
.100
.100
.100
.6
.6
.6






.050
.050
.050
.1
. 1
. 1
.050
.050
.050
Day 1
18
1
52
0
0
0
0
<0
0
71
71
162
3
<1
34
47
45
94
0
<0
0
170
12
215
75
0
119

.7

. 100
.100
.200
.400
. 100
.700
. 1
.6

.1





.350
.050
.100



.3
.550

Day 2
19
13

0.100
0. 100

0.200
<0. 100

74.6
74.3

43
31

45
46
•
0.100
<0.050

130
46

20.4
2.35 '

Da
18
20

0.
0.

0.
0.

72.
73.

25
17

40
45

0.
0.

1 . 1
1 .

36.
6.

y 3



100
100

400
100

5
2







150
U50


3

6
15


-------
                                          Table V-173 (Continued)


                                     TITANIUM SURFACE TREATMENT RINSE
                                       RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
00
£*
Ul
           Pol 1utant

Nonconvent iona1 Po11utants  (Continued)

Magnesium




Manganese




Molybdenum




Phosphate




Sodium




Sulfate




Tin




Titanium           	  "  ~ "




Total Dissolved Solids (TDS)
Stream
Code
L-3
L-5
L-6
L-3
L-5
-L-6
L-3
L-5
L-6
L-3
L-5
L-6
L-3
L-5
L-6
L-3
L-5
L-6
L-3
L-5
L-6
L-3
L-5
L-6
L-3
L-5 .
L-6
Samp}
Type
6
6
1
6
6
1
6
6
1
6
6
1
6
6
1
6
6
1
6
6
1
~ 6
6
1
6
6
1
e
Concentrations (mg/1)
_ Source
34
34
34
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
1
1
1
19
19
19
21 ,000
21 ,000
21 ,000
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
390
390
390
.0
.0
.0
.050
..050
.050
.050
.050
.050



.6
.6
.6
3
5

.050
.050
.050
. 050 "
.050
.050


1
Day 1
32.
32.
72.
0.
4
7
1
150
Day 2
33.
33.

0.
<0.050 <0.
2.
1 .
<0 .
0.
3
1
1 .
55.
20.
50.
,500
,400
240
0.
0.
0.
"186
3.
15.
300
440
,400
10
60
050
050


9
9
1
2
4
3

050
650
050

55
1




0.
0.

2.
0.

20.
19.

,000
,000

<0.
<0.

47.
20.

900
900

6
4

050
050

200
200

2
5

1
9




050
050

9
3




Day 3
32
32

0
0

0
0

<0
<0

17
17

460
760

<0
<0

79
34

660
640

. 1
.5

. 100
.050

.550
.200

.5
.5

.9
.9




.050
.050

.7
.4





-------
                                          Table V-173 (Continued)


                                     TITANIUM SURFACE TREATMENT RINSE
                                       RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
00
•fo
a\
                 Pollutant
      Nonconventiona]  Pollutants  (Continued)
      Total  Organic  Carbon  (TOC)
      Total  Solids  (TS)
      Vanadium
      Yttrium
      Conventional  Pollutants
      Total  Suspended  Solids  (TSS)
      pH  (standard units)
Stream
Code
L-3
L-5
L-6
L-3
L-5
L-6
L-3
L-5
L-6
L-3
L-5
L-6
L-3
L-5
L-6
L-3
L-5
L-6
Sample
Type
6
6
1
6
6
1
6
6
1
6
6
1
6
6
1
6
6
1
Concentrations (mg/1)
Source
2
2
. 2
400
400
400
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
.7
7
7
7
7
7





1
.050
.050
.050
.050
.050
.050



.61
.61
.61
Day 1
4
4
15
370 1
550 1
,540
3.85
0. 100
0.350
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
40
32

-------
                                                                         1
                           Table V-174

             TITANIUM ALKALINE CLEANING SPENT  BATHS
                  Plant

                    1
                    2
                    3
                    4
                    5
                    3
                    5
                    6

                Average
  Wastewater Discharge*
   L/k.kg .    gal/ton
   52.10
   57.08
  229.9
  239.6
1,962
3,679
9,812
   NR

2,290
   12. 50
   13. 69
   55.14
   57.46
  470.6
  882.4
2,353
   NR

  549.2
NR - Data not reported

*Discharge from operation.
                              847

-------
             Table V-175

TITANIUM ALKALINE CLEANING SPENT BATHS
     RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
                 Pollutant

      Toxic Pollutants


      117.  beryl 1ium



      118.  cadmi urn



      119.  chromium (total)



00    120.  copper
it-
CD

      121.  cyanide


      122.  lead



      124.  nickel



      128.  zinc
          Stream
           Code
            AQ-1
            AX-2
            AX-5

            AQ-T
            AX-2
            AX-5

            AQ-1
            AX-2
            AX-5

            AQ-1
            AX-2
            AX-5

            AX-2
            AX-5

            AQ-1
            AX-2
            AX-5

            AQ-1
            AX-2
            AX-5

            AQ-1
            AX-2
            AX-5
                                  Concentrations (mg/1)
Source
         <0.001
         <0.100
         <0.100

         <0.005
         <0.100
         <0.100

          0.011
         <0.500
         <0.500

          0.770
          4.300
          6.300

          0.700
         <0.500

         <0.050
         <0.500
         <0.500

         <0.012
         <0.500
         <0.500

          0.491
         <0.100
         <0.100

-------
                                          Table  V-175  (Continued)

                                  TITANIUM ALKALINE  CLEANING  SPENT  BATHS
                                        RAW WASTEWATER  SAMPLING  DATA
                 Pollutant
                                             Stream
                                              Code
                                                                .Source
                                                               Concentrations  (nig/1 )
00
*»
vD
Nonconvent i ona1  Pollutants

A1umi num



Ammonia (as N)


Cobalt

Fluoride


Iron



Ti tanium



Vanadium



Conventional  Pollutan'ts
AQ-1
AX-2
AX-5

AX-2
AX-5

AQ-1

AX-2
AX-5

AQ-1
AX-2
AX-5

AQ-1
AX-2
AX-5

AQ-1
AX-2
AX-3
 0. 123
<2.00
<2.00

<0.500
<0.500

 0.021

 1 .070
 0.780

 1 .530
 5.400
 1 .900
                                                                          <1
                                                                           6.500
                                                                           4.800
                                                                             100
                                                                           0.0026
                                                                          <0.100
                                                                          <1 .00
     Oi1  and Grease
     Total Suspended"Solids  (TSS)
     pH
                                         AQ-1
                                         AX-2
                                        . AX-5

                                         AX-2"
                                         AX-5

                                         AX-2
                                         AX-5
                          720.00
                          930.00
                           <2.0 .

                          400.00
                            9.00

                            9.5
                            2.7
      1.  No analyses were performed on the following toxic pollutants:
      1-116, 123,  125-127 and  129.

-------
                           Table V-176

                TITANIUM ALKALINE CLEANING RINSE
 Plant

   1
   2
   3
   4
   5
   5
   6
       Water Use
   L/kkg     gal/ton
    348.0
    350.3
  5,177
 82,320
166,800
314,000
     NR
             Percent    Wastewater Discharge*
             Recycle      L/kkg     gal/ton
Average  94,830
    83.40
    84.00
 1,241
19,740
40,000
75,290
    NR

22,740
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
NR


5
79
166
314

348.
350.
,177
,290
,800
,000
NR
0
3







1
19
40
75

83.
84.
,241
,010
,000
,290
NR
40
00





                                  94,330
22f620
NR - Data not reported

*Discharge from operation.
                              850

-------
                                                Table V-177

                                      TITANIUM ALKALINE CLEANING RINSE
                                        RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA

00
U1
           Pol 1utant

Toxic Pol 1utants


117.  bery11i urn


118.  cadmium-


119.  chromium (Total)


120.  copper


121.  cyanide

122.  lead


124.  nickel


128.  zinc



Nonconventional  Pol 1utants

Aluminum


Ammonia

Fluoride

Iron


Ti tani um
Stream Sample
Code Type
•AQ-2
AX-3/ 1
AQ-2
AX-3 1
AQ-2
AX-3 1
AQ-2
AX-3 1
AX-3 1
AQ-2
AX-3 1
AQ-2
AX-3 1
AQ-2
AX-3 1
AQ-2
AX-3 1
AX-3 1
AX-3 "" 1
AQ-2
AX-3 1
AQ-2
AX-3 1
Concentrations (mg/1)
Source Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
<0.001
<0.100
0.0120
<0 . 1 00
<0.003
<0.500
- 0.270
6.300
<0.500
0.072
ND
<0.012
<0.500
0.309
ND
0.113
<2.00 .
<0.500
" '0.990 	 ""
0.536
1.900
0.825
- <1 . 10

-------
                                           Table  V-177  (Continued)
                 Pollutant
                                      TITANIUM ALKALINE  CLEANING RINSE

                                        RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
                                             Stream
                                              Code
                                                                 Source
                                                                     Concentrations Cmg/1)
                                     Day 2
      Conventional  Pollutants


      Oil  and  Grease


      Total  Suspended  Solids  (TSS)


      pH
AX-3      1


AX-3-     1


AX-3      1
<2.0


 9.00


 7.4
00
«J1
to
      1.   No  analyses  were  performed on the following toxic pollutants:

      1-116,  123,  125-127 and 129.

-------
                           Table V-178

                    .TITANIUM MOLTEN SALT RINSE
 Plant

   1

Average
    Water Use
L/kkg     gal/ton
 954.9

 954.9
229.0

229.0
Percent
Recycle

  0.0
                     Wastewater Discharge*
                       L/kkg     gal/ton
954.9

954.9
229.0

229.0
*Discharge from operation.
                              853

-------
                           Table V-179

                  TITANIUM TUMBLING WASTEWATER
 Plant

   1

Average
    Water Use
L/kkg     gal/ton
 790.0

 790.0
189.4

189.4
Percent
Recycle

  0.0
                     Wastewater Discharge*
                       L/kkg     gal/ton
790.0

790.0
18-9.4

189.4
*Discharge from operation.
                               854

-------
         Table V-180

TITANIUM TUMBLING WASTEWATER
RAW WASTEWATER. SAMPLING DATA
Pol lutant
Toxic Pollutants
114. antimony
115. arsenic
117. beryl 1 i urn
118. cadmi urn
11.9. chromium (total)
120. copper
00 121. cyanide (total)
(Jl

-------
                                         Table V-180  (Continued)

                                       TITANIUM TUMBLING WASTEWATER
                                       RAW WASTEWATER  SAMPLING DATA
00
Ul
O\
           Pollutant

Nonconventional  Pollutants (Continued)



Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD)

Chloride

Cobalt

Fluoride

Iron

Magnesium

Manganese

Molybdenum

Phosphate

Sodium

Sulfate

Tin

Ti tani um

Total Dissolved Solids (TDS)

Total Organic Carbon (TOC)

Total Solids  (TS)

Vanadium

Yttrium
Stream
Code
L-9
L-9
L-9
L-9
L-9
L-9
L-9
L-9
L-9
L-9
L-9
L-9
L-9
L-9
L-9
L-9
L-9
L-9
Sample
Type
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 21
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Concentrations (mg/1)
Source
<1
50
<0.050
1.1
<0.050
34.0
<0.050
<0..050
1
19.6
,000
<0.050
<0.050
390
2
400
<0.050
<0.050
Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
21,000
120
<0.500
1 10
1 1 1
13.0
1 .50
8.00
<1
2,730
900
12.0
156
18,000
380
18,000
1 .50
<0.500

-------
                                          Table  V-180  (Continued)


                                      TITANIUM  TUMBLING  WASTEWATER

                                      RAW WASTEWATER  SAMPLING  DATA
Pol 1 utant
Conventional Pollutants
Oi 1 and Grease
Total Suspended Solids (TSS)
pH (standard units)
Stream
Code
L-9
L-9
L-9
Sample Concentrat'i ons (mg/1)
Type Source
1 <1
1 7
1 7.61
Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
17
6,800
10.50
CO
ui
      1.  "No analyses were performed on  the  following  toxic  pollutants:   1-113,  116,  and 129.

-------
Average
                           Table V-181
           TITANIUM SAWING'OR GRINDING SPENT NEAT OILS
Plant
1
2
Water Use
L/kkg gal/ton
2.36 0.57
NR NR
Percent
Recycle
0.0
' NR
Wastewater I
L/kkg
0.00
NR '
Dischar
gal/to
0.00
NR
2.36
•0.57
0.00
0.00
NR - Data not reported
*Discharge from operation.
                               858

-------
                           Table V-182

           TITANIUM SAWING OR GRINDING SPENT EMULSIONS
Plant
               Water Use ,
                     gal/ton
Percent    Wastewater Discharge*
Recycle      L/kkg     gal/ton
1
1
2
3
3
2
4
5, .
6'
7
8
9
10
10
11
11
6
6
11
39.60
164.5.
NR
15,040
15,030
NR '
NR
NR
35,400
NR "
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
9.50
39.46
NR
3,606 .
3,603
NR
NR
NR
8,490
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
100
100
100
100
NR
NR
100
100
100
.0.0
100
0.0
100
100
NR'
NR .
100
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00:
0.00
0.00
0.00
o.oo
21.25
27.02
75.47
97.87
352.4
521.3
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR '
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
5.10
6.48
18.10
23.47
84.51
125.0
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
Average  13,140
                    3,150
            182.5
43.78
NR - Data not reported

*Discharge 'from operation.
                               859

-------
                Table V-183

TITANIUM SAWING OR GRINDING SPENT EMULSIONS
        RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
Toxic
6.
23.
44.
48.
51 .
1 14.
CD
S 115-
1 17.
1 18.
1 19.
120.
121 .
122.
Pol lutant
Pol lutants
carbon tetrachl oride
chl orof orm
methylene chloride
dichl oro bromomethane
ch 1 orodi bromomethane
antimony
arsenic
beryl 1 ium
cadmi urn
chromium (total )
copper
cyanide (total )
lead
Stream
Code
L-10
L-10
L-10
L-10
L-10
L-10
L-10
L-10
L-10
L-10
L-10
L-10
L-10
Sample Concentrations (mg/1)
Type Source
1 0.004
1 0.123
1 ND
1 0.023
1 0.002
1 <0.010
1 <0.010
1 <0.005
1 <0.020
1 <0.020
1 <0.050
1 0.03
1 <0.050
Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
0.002
ND
0.005
ND
ND
0.010
<0.010
<0.050
<0.200
1.20
<0.500
3.8
<0.500

-------
          Table V-183 (Continued)

TITANIUM SAWING OR GRINDING SPENT EMULSIONS
        RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA








00
cr»
M







Po 1 1 utant
Toxic Pollutants (Continued)
123. mercury
124. nickel
125.- seleriiucfi- - ' -
126. silver
127. thai 1 iun.i

128. zinc
Nonconvent i ona 1 Pol-lutants
Acidity
Al kal ini ty
Al umi num
Ammonia Nitrogen
Barium
Stream Sample
Code Type

L-10 1
L-10 1
,L.1.0 -,.-1. .
L-10 1
L-10 1

L-10 i

.L-10 1
L-10 1
L-10 1
L-10 1
L-10 1
Concentrations (tng/1)
Source Day 1 Day 2 Day 3

<0
<0
<0
<0
<0

<0

<1
250
0
0
0

.0002
.050
.100
.010
.010

.020



.200
.08
. 100

<0
9
	 <0
<0
<0

0

<1
2,000
33
3
<0

.0004
.50
..100.
.010
.010

.40



.0
.8
.500

-------
          Table V-183 (Continued)

TITANIUM SAWING OR GRINDING SPENT EMULSIONS
        RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA

Pol lutant
Stream
Code
Sample
Concentrations (mg/1)
Type Source
Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
Nonconventional Pollutants (Continued)




00
cn
N)






Boron
Calcium
Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD)
Chloride
Cobalt
Fl uoride
Iron
Magnesium
Manganese
Molybdenum
Phosphate
Sodi um
L-10
L-10
L-10
L-10
L-10
L-10
L-10
L-10
L-10-
L-10
L-10
L-10
1 <0
1 77
1 <1
1 50
• 1 
-------
                                          Table V-183 (Continued)
                                TITANIUM SAWING OR GRINDING SPENT EMULSIONS
                                        RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
00
a\
U)
           Pol 1utant


Nonconventional  Pol 1 utan.ts  (Continued)



Sulfate

Tin

Ti tanium

Total Dissolved So:l ids (TDS)

Total Organic Carbon (TOO

Total Sol ids  (TS)

Vanadi urn

Yttriurn

Conventional  Pollutants

Oi 1 and Grease

Total Suspended Solids (TSS)
Stream
Code
L-10
L-10
L-10
L-10-
L-10
L-10
L-10
L-10
L-10
L-10
Sample ' Cone
Type Source
1 21,000
1 <0.050,
1' <0.050
1 390
1 2
1 400
1 <0.050
<0.050
1 <1
1 7
(>ntrat ions (mg/1 )
Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
20,000
<0-.500
6.00
1 1 ,500
1 ,400
14,000
2.50
<0.500
34
244

-------
                                         Table V-183 (Continued)

                               TITANIUM SAWING OR GRINDING SPENT EMULSIONS
                                       RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
                Pollutant
     Conventional  Pollutants (Continued)
                                            Stream
                                             Code
                                                 Samp1e
                                                  Type
Concentrations (mg/1)
                                                                Source
      Day 1
Day 2
Day 3
     pH (standard units)
                                        L-10
                                                            7.61
                                                                                  10.30
00
1.   The following toxic pollutants were not detected in this waste stream:   1-5,  7-22,
    24-43,  45-47, 49,  50,  and 52-88.

2.   Note that stream codes Y-7 and Y-8 also appear on the nickel-cobalt sawing or grinding
    spent emulsions raw wastewater sampling data table.  The wastewater is  derived from an
    operation in both  subcategories.

3.   No analyses were performed on the following toxic pollutants:   89—113,  116,  and 129.

-------
                         .  Table V-184

        TITANIUM SAWING OR GRINDING CONTACT COOLING WATER


             .  Water Use         Percent    Wastewater Discharge*
 Plant     L/kkg     gal/ton     Recycle   .   L/kkg    • gal/ton

   1      4,760      1,141         0.0     4,760      1,141

Average   4,760      1,141                 4,760   '.'  1,141
*Discharge from operation.
                               865

-------
                                               Table V-185
                              TITANIUM  SAWING OR GRINDING  CONTACT  COOLING VIATER
                                        RAW WASTEWATER  SAMPLING  DATA
00
0\
           Pollutant

Toxic Pollutants


117.  beryl Mum

118.  cadmium

119.  chromium (total)

120.  copper

122.  lead

124.  nickel

128.  zinc


Nonconvantional  Po11utants

A1uminum

Cobalt

Iron

Magnesium

Manganese

Molybdenum

Titanium

Tin

Vanadium
Stream
Code
BS-1
BS-1
BS-1
BS-1
BS-1
BS-1
BS-1
BS-1
BS-1
BS-1
BS-1
BS-1
BS-1
BS-1
BS-1
BS-1
Sample Concentrations Cmg/1)
Type Source Da
<0.
<0.
0.
0.
<0.
<0.
0.
1 .
0.
1 .
13.
0.
<0.
7.
0.
0.
y 1 Day 2 Day ;
001
005
0034
093
050
012
009
190
0066
340
50
224
020
060
222
4560
      1.     No    analyses   were   performed   for   the   following
      pollutants:   1-116,  121,  123,  125-127  and  129.
                                                            toxi c

-------
                          < Table V-186




            TITANIUM DYE PENETRANT TESTING WASTEWATER
Plant
1
2
3
3
3
4
Water
' L/kkg
384.6
1,848
NR
NR
NR
NR
Use
gal/ton
92.23
443.1
NR
. NR
NR
NR
Percent
Recycle
0.0
0.0
NR
0.0
NR
NR
Wastewater
L/kkg ,
384.6
1,848
NR
NR
NR
NR
. Discharge*
gal/ton
92.23
443.1
NR
NR'
NR •
NR
Average   1,116
267.7
1,116
267.7
NR - Data not reported



*Discharge from operation.
                               867

-------
                           Table V-187

                TITANIUM HYDROTESTING WASTEWATER
               Water Use
 Plant     L/kkg     gal/ton

   1     56,240     13,490

Average  56,240     13,490
Percent
Recycle

  0.0
  Wastewater Discharge*
    L/kkg     gal/ton
56,240

56,240,
13,490

13,490
*Discharge from operation.
                               868

-------
                           Table V-188

           TITANIUM WET AIR POLLUTION CONTROL SLOWDOWN
              .Water Use         Percent
 Plant     L/kkg     gal/ton     Recycle
                        Wastewater Discharge*
                          L/kkg ;    gal/ton
1
2
2
3
4
2
5 ,
2
6
7
8
9
10
11



25
7

1
2
53
85
554



175.2
88.13
273.5
,020
,660 .
892.8
,459
,146
,740
,320
,300
NR
NR
NR



6
1



12
20
132



42.
21.
65.
,000
,837
214.
349.
514.
,890
,460
,900
NR
NR
NR
01
14
60


1
9
5






91.0
0,0
0.0
P
95.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
90.0
92.0
95.0
NR
NR
NR

"




1
2
3
6
6



15.
88.
273.
285.
403.
892.
,459
,146
,583
,872
,929
NR
NR
NR
01
13 ,
5 !
9
3
8 ;








3.
21.
65.
68.
96.
214.
349.
514.
859.
1,648
1,662
NR
NR
NR
60
14
60
57
71
1
9
5
2





Average  66,460
15,940
2,086
500.3
 P - Periodic discharge
NR - Data not reported

*Discharge from operation.
                              869

-------
                                               Table V-189
                             TITANIUM WET AIR POLLUTION CONTROL SLOWDOWN
                                     RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
00
-J
O
           Pollutant

Toxic Pollutants

114.  antimony

115.  arsenic

117.  beryl 1ium

118.  cadmium

119.  chromium (total)

120.  copper

122.  lead

123.  mercury

124.  nickel

125.  selenium

126.  silver

127.  thallium

128.  zinc
Stream Sample
Code Type
L-8 1
L-8 1
L-8 1
L-8 1
L-8 1
L-8 1
L-8 1
L-8 1
L-8 1
L-8 1
L-8 1
L-8 1
L-8 1
Concentrations
Source Day 1
<0.010
<0.010
<0.005
<0.020
<0.020
<0.050
<0.050
<0.0002
<0.050
<0.100
<0.010
<0.010
<0.020
(nw/n
Day 2 Day 3
<0.010
<0.010
<0.005
<0.020
<0.020
<0.050
0.100
<0.0002
<0.050
<0. 100
<0.010
<0.010
0.300

-------
                                         Table V-189 (Continued)

                              TITANIUM WET AIR POLLUTION CONTROL SLOWDOWN
                                      RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
00
Pol lutant
Nonconvent i onal Pollutants
Acidi ty
Alkalinity
A ) uminum
Ammonia Nitrogen
BaM-urn . . . • - -
Boron
.Ca 1 cium
Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD)
Chi oride
Cobalt
Fluoride
Iron
Magnesium
Manganese
Molybdenum
Stream
Code
L-8
L-8
L-8
L-8
L-8
. L-8
L-8
L-8
L-8
L-8
L-8
L-8
L-8
L-8
L-8
Sample
Concentrations (mg/1)
Type Source Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
1 <1
1 250
1 0.
1 0.
1 0.
1 <0.
1 - 77.
1 <1
1 50
1 <0.
1 1 .
1 <0.
1 34.
1 <0.
1 <0.


200
08
100
100
6


050
1
050
0
050
050

390
. 0.400
0.15
<0-.050
<0.100
19.8
220
55
0.050
33
1 .80
30.0
<0.050
<0.050

-------
                                         Table  V-189  (Continued)

                              TITANIUM WET AIR  POLLUTION CONTROL  SLOWDOWN
                                      RAW WASTEWATER  SAMPLING DATA
00
^J
to
           Pollutant

Nonconventional  Pollutants (Continued)


Phosphate

Sodium

Sulfate

Tin

Titanium

Total Dissolved Solids (TDS)

Total Organic Carbon (TOO

Total Solids  (TS)

Vanadium

Yttrium

Conventional  Pollutants


Total Suspended Sol ids (TSS)

pH (standard  units)
Stream
Code
L-8
L-8
L-8
L-8
L-8
L-8
L-8
L-8
L-8
L-8
L-8
L-8
Sample Concentrations (mg/1)
Type Source
1 1
1 19.6
1 21,000
1 <0.050
1 <0.050
1 390
1 2
1 400
1 <0.050
1 <0.050
1 7
1 7.61
Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
<2
253
6,000
<0.050
2.75
720
40
870
0.100
<0.050
40
9.81
     1.   No analyses were performed on the following toxic pollutants:  1-113, 116, and 129.

     2.   Note that stream code Y-5 also appears on the nickel-cobalt wet air pollution control
         blowdown raw wastewater sampling data table.  The wastewat_er is derived from an
         operation in both subcategories.

-------
                            Table v-190             ;

               URANIUM EXTRUSION SPENT LUBRICANTS


              Water Use         Percent     Wastewater Discharge
Plant     1/kkg     gal/ton     Recycle      1/kkg    •  gal/ton

  1         NR   '  .    NR '        NR         0 '(• + )!       0  ( + )
+ - Loss due to evaporation and drag-out
                               87.3

-------
                            Table V-191

          URANIUM EXTRUSION TOOL CONTACT COOLING WATER
Plant

  1
    Water Use
1/kkg     gal/ton
 344
82.5
Percent
Recycle

  0
                       Wastewater Discharge
                        1/kkg      gal/ton
                                   344
                                    82.5
•f - Loss-due to evaporation and drag-out
                               874

-------
                            Table V-192

                URANIUM FORGING SPENT LUBRICANTS
Plant

  1
    Water Use
1/kkg     gal/ton
  NR
NR
Percent
Recycle

 . NR
                     Wastewater Discharge
                      1/kkg   ;   gal/ton
0
0
+ -' Loss due to evaporation and drag-out
                               875

-------
                            Table  V-193



          URANIUM HEAT  TREATMENT CONTACT COOLING  WATER
Plant
1


2

Water Use
1/kkg gal/ton
NR
NR
NR
948
2,846
NR
NR
NR
227
682
Percent
Recycle
P
P
P
0
0
Wastewater
1/kkg
6.21
' 18,6
69.2
948
2,846
Discharg
gal/ton
1.
4.
16.
227
682
49
47
6


P - Periodic discharge
                               876

-------
                                               Table V-194

                              URANIUM HEAT TREATMENT CONTACT COOLING WATER
                                      RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
. 00

           Pollutant

Toxic Pollutants


114.  antimony



115.  arsenic



117.  beryl 1ium



118.  cadmium



119.  chromium (total)



120.  copper



121.  cyanide (total)



122.  lead



123.  mercury



124.  nickel



125.  selenium
Stream
Code
V-14
V-15
V-16
V-14
V-15
V-16
V-14
V-15
V-16
V-14
V-15
V-16
V-14
V-15
V-16
V-14
V-15
V-16
V-14
V-15
V-16
V-14
V-15
V-16
V-14
V-15
V-16
V-14
V-15
V-16
V-14
V-15
V-16
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
'1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Sample Concentrations (mg/1)
Type Source Day 1
<0.0006
<0.0006
<0.0006 .
<0.001
<0.001 '
<0.001
0.012
0.012
0.012
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
0.061
0.061
0.061
0 . 088
0.088
0.088
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
0.036
0.036
0.036
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
0.055
0.055
0.055
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
Pay 2 Day 3
0.0023
<0.0006
<0.0006
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
0.017
0.014
0.013
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
0.099
<0.03
0.051
0. 14
0.8
0 . 095.
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
14.0
0. 15
4.9
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
2.3
0.055
<0.03
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001

-------
                                      Table V-194  (Continued)

                          URANIUM HEAT TREATMENT CONTACT  COOLING  WATER
                                   RAW WASTEWATER  SAMPLING  DATA
                Pollutant

     Toxic  Pollutants
                                            Stream
                                             Code
                       Source
                                                                    Concentrations (mg/1)
     126.   silver
     127.   thallium
     128.   zinc
00
«-J
00
V-14
V-15
V-16

V-14
V-15
V-16

V-14
V-15
V-16

-------
                                       Table V-194  (Continued)

                             URANIUM HEAT TREATMENT  CONTACT COOLING WATER
                                    RAW WASTEWATER  SAMPLING DATA
                 Pol 1utant
                                             Stream
                                              Code
                                                               Concentrations (mg/1)
                                                                Source
      Nonconventional  Pollutants
00
«J
vo
      Acidity
      Alkalini ty
      Aluminum
Ammonia Nitrogen
      Barium
     Boron
      Calcium
      Chemical Oxygen Demand  (COD)
     Chloride
     Cobalt
V-14
V-15
V-16
V-14
V-15
V-16 1
V-14 • 1
V-15 1
V-16 V
V-14 1
V-15 1
V-16 /I
V-14 1
V-15 1
V-16 1
V-14 1
V-15 1
V-16 1
V-14 1
V-15 1
V-16 1
V-14 1
V-15 1
V-16 1
V-14 1
V-15 1
V-16 1
V-14 1
V-15 1
V-16 1
<10.0
<10.0
<10.0
33.0
33.0
33.0
0.131
0.131
0.131
0.07
0.07
0.07
0.2
0.2
0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
0 . 045
0.045
0.045
<50.0
<50.0
<50.0
36.0
36.0
36.0
0.044
0 . 044
0.044
                                                                                  270
    62
    77

     0.5
     0. 14
     0.3

    27
    <0. 1
     0.21

   987.0
     1.3
     0.8

     0. 16
     0.077
    <0.03

   477.0
   1 10.0
     9.8

-  .40
    50
    <5

 5,300
    12
    30

     0.24
     0.06
     0.053

-------
                                         Table V-194 (Continued)

                              URANIUM HEAT TREATMENT CONTACT COOLING WATER
                                      RAW WASTEV/ATER SAMPLING DATA
                  Pollutant
                                              Stream
                                               Code
         Concentrations (mg/1)
     Source
       Nonconventional Pollutants (Continued)
00
00
O
       Fluoride
       Iron
       Magnesium
       Manganese
       Molybdenum
V-14
V-15
V-16
V-14
V-15
V-16
V-14
V-15
V-16
V-14
V-15
V-16
V-14
V-15
V-16
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
 0.41
 0.41
 0.41

 0. 16
 0.16
 0.16
   0
   0
   0

   058
   058
   058
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
 1.8
 0.35
 0.9

77.0
 0.4
 1 .6

 8.4
 0.8
10.0

 7.2
 0.2
 0.2

 0. 15
 0.05
<0.03

-------
                                         Table V-194 (Continued)

                              URANIUM HEAT TREATMENT CONTACT COOLING WATER
                                      RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
00
CO
                  Pol 1utant
      Noneonventional  Pol 1utants  (Continued)

      Ni trate
      Phosphorus
      Sodium
      Sulfate
      Tin
      Titanium
      Total Dissolved Solids  (TDS)
      Total Organic Carbon  (TOC)
      Total Solids  (TS)
      Urani um
Stream
Code
id)
V-14
V-15
V-16
V-14
V-15
V-16
V-14
V-15
V-16
V-14
V-15
V-16
V-14
V-15
V-16
V-14
V-15
V-16
V-14
V-15
V-16
V-14
V-15
V-16
V-14
V-15
V-16
V-14
V-15
V-16


1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1-
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Sampl e
Type
<0
<0
<0
0
0
0
74
74
74
2
2
2
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
300
300
300
<10
<1 0
<10
330
330
330
0
0
0
Concentrations
Source Day 1
.09
.09
.09
.5
.5
.5 -
.0
.0
.0
.8
.8
.8
.25
.25
.25
.2
.2
.2
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.89
.89
.89
(mg/1)
Day 2

7
0
2
1
1
45
120
183
4
7
8
0
<0
<0
0
<0
<0
7,800
140
4,000
<,
<1
3
7,900
86
2,000
51
9
10

Day 3
.09
.9
.46
.0
.0
.7
.0
.0
.0
.9
.9
.2
.25
.25
.25
.2
.2
.2









.5
.6
.0

-------
                                         Table V-194 (Continued)


                              URANIUM HEAT TREATMENT CONTACT COOLING WATER
                                      RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
                  Pollutant
       Nonconventional  Pollutants (Continued)
       Vanadium
       Yttrium
00
00
to

Gross Alpha
       Gross Beta
       Radium-226
Stream
Code
:d)
V-14 1
V-15 1
V-16 1
V-14 1
V-15 1
V-16 1
V-14 1
V-15 1
V-16 1
V-14 1
V-15 1"
V-16 1
V-14 1
V-15 1
V-16 1
Sample Concentrations (mg/1)
Type Source Day 1 Day
<0 . 03
<0.03
<0.03
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Concentrations (nCi/L)
0.014
0.014
0.014
<0.013
<0.013
<0.013
<0.0008
<0.0008 . .
<0.0008
_2 Day 3
0.15
0.05
0.045
<0.1
<0.1
<0. 1

33.5
6.7
7.8
66.7
10.2
10.3
<0.0017
0.04
0.01 18

-------
00
00
U)
                                        Table V-194 (Continued)

                             URANIUM HEAT TREATMENT CONTACT COOLING WATER
                                     RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
                 Pollutant
      Conventional Pollutants
      Oi1  and Grease
      Total Suspended Solids (TSS)
      pH (standard units)
Stream
Code
V-14
V-15
V-16
V-14
V-15
V-16
V-14 1
V-15
V-16
Sample Concentrations
Type Source Day 1
<1 .0
<1 .0
<1 .0
<1 .0
<1 .0
<1 . 0
6
6
6
(mg/1)
Day 2
7
<
8
10

2




Day 3
1
1
4
0
1
5
7
7
7
      1.  No ana-lyses were performed on the following toxic pollutants:   1-113,  116,  and  129.

-------
              Table V-195

URANIUM SURFACE TREATMENT SPENT BATHS
   Plant

     1

     2

     3
Wastewater Discharge
 1/kkg      gal/ton
  27.2

  NR

  NR
 6.52

NR

NR
                  884

-------
             Table V-196

URANIUM SURFACE TREATMENT SPENT BATHS
    RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
'' Pol lutant
Toxic Pol lutants
114. antimony
115. arsenic
117. beryllium
118. cadmium
119. chromium (total)
120. copper
00
00 122. lead
123. mercury
124. nickel
125. selenium
126. silver
127. thallium
128. zinc
Nonconvent ional Pol lutants
Aluminum
Barium
Boron
Calcium.
Cobalt
Iron
Magnesium
Stream
Code
V-2
V-2
V-2
V-2
V-2
V-2
V-2
V-2
V-2
V-2
V-2
V-2
V-2

V-2
V-2
V-2
V-2
V-2
V-2
V-2
Sample Concentrations (mg/1)
Type Source
1 <0.0006
1. <0.001
1 0.012
1 <0.03
1 0.061
1 0.088
1 0<036
1 <0.005
1 0.055
1 <0.001
1 <0.0005
1 
-------
       Table V-196 (Continued)

URANIUM SURFACE TREATMENT SPENT BATHS
    RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA






00
00
Pol lutant
Nonconventi onal Pol lutants
Manganese
Molybdenum
Sodium
Tin
Titanium
Vanadium
Yttrium
Stream
Code
(Continued)
V-2
V-2
V-2
V-2
V-2
V-2
V-2
Sample
Type
1 0
1 <0
1 74
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
Concentrations (mq/1)
Source
.058
.03
.0
.25
.2
.03
. 1
Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
2.8
2.1
4.5
0.9
7.3
1.8
6.0

-------
                                      fable  V-196  (Continued)

                               URANIUM SURFACE  TREATMENT  SPENT  BATHS
                                   RAW WASTEWATER  SAMPLING  DATA
               Pollutant
                                           Stream
                                            Code
Source
    Concentrations (mg/1)
    Conventional  Pollutants
    pH  (standard  units)
                                          V-2
                                                                       <1
00
00
    1.   No  analyses  were  performed  for  the  following  toxic pollutants:   1-113,  116,  121,  and
        129.

-------
                            Table V-197

                  URANIUM SURFACE TREATMENT RINSE
Plant

  1

  2
    Water Use
1/kkg     gal/ton
 268

 406
64.3

97.5
Percent
Recycle

   0

   0
                      Wastewater Discharge
                       1/kkg      gal/ton
268

406
64.3

97.5
                              888

-------
           Table V-198

URANIUM SURFACE TREATMENT RINSE
  RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
Stream Sample Concentrations (mg/1)
Toxic
1 14.
1 15.
1 17.
1 18.
00 ng
00 ' la-
VO
120.
121 .
122.
123.
124.
125.
126.
127.
128.
Pol lutant
Pol 1 utants
antimony
arsenic
beryl 1 ium
cadmium
chromium (total)
copper
cyanide (total )
lead
mercury
nickel
selenium
si 1 ver
thai 1 ium
zinc
V-3
V-4
V-3
V-4
V-3
V-4
V-3
V-4
V-3
V-4
V-3
V-4
V-3
V-4
V-3
V-4
V-3
V-4
V-3
V-4
V-3
V-4
V-3
V-4
V-3
V-4
V-3
V-4
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
Code Ty
<0.0006
<0.0006
<0.001
<0.001
0.012
0.012
<0.03
<0.03
0.061
0.061
0.088
0.088
<0.01
<0.01
0.036
0.036
<0.005
<0.005
0.055
0.055
<0.001
<0.001
<0.0005
<0.0005
<0.001
<0.001
0.101
0.101
pe Source
<0.0006
<0.001
0.7
0.4
0.6
12.0
<0.1
110.0
<0.005
3.4
<0.001
0.0009
•<0.001
0.6
Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
<0.0006 <0.0006
<0.001 <0.001
0.2 0.3
0.13 0.25
0.17 0.4
3.0 4.7
0.05
6.0 14.0
<0.005 <0.005
"0:8 1.7
<0.1 0.0015
<0.0005 <0.0005
<0.001 <0.001
0.8 0,6

-------
     Table V-198  (Continued)

URANIUM SURFACE TREATMENT RINSE
  RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
Stream Sample Concentrations (mg/1)

Pol lutant


Nonconventioal Pollutants




00
VO
O
Acidity
Alkal inity
Al uminum
Ammonia Nitrogen
Barium
V-4
V-4
V-3
V-4
V-3
V-4
V-3
V-4
2
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
Code _Jj
<10.0
33.0
0. 131
0.131
0.07
0.07
0.2
0.2
/oe Source Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
1,200 3,500
<1 <1
165.0
9.4 2.1
<0.3
0.68 0.24
195.0
3.7 39.0

-------
     Table V-198 (Continued)

URANIUM SURFACE TREATMENT RINSE
  RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA

Pol lutant
Stream
Code
Nonconventional Pol lutants
Boron
Calcium
Chemical Oxygen Demand
(COD)
Chloride
Cobalt
Fluoride
Iron
Magnesium
Manganese
Molybdenum
Nitrate
Phosphorus
Sodium
Sulfate
Tin
V-3
V-4
V-3
V-4
V-3
V-4
V-4
V-3
V-4
V-4
V-3
V-4
V-3
V-4
V-3
V-4
V-3
V-4
V-4
V-3
V-4
V-3
V-4
vr4
V-3
V-4
(Cont inued-)-
1
2
1
2
.1
2
2
1
2
2
1
2
. 1
2
1
2
1
2
2
1
2
1
2
2
1
2

<0 .
<0 .
0.
0.
<50.
<50.
36.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
8.
8.
0.
0.
<°:
<0.
0.
0.
74.
74.
2.
<0 .
<0 .

2
2
045
045
0
0
0
044
044
41
16
16
0
0
058
058
03
03
09
5 . ..
5
0
0
B
25
25
Sample Concentrations (mg/1)
Type Source
3.2.
120.0
50

4. 1

19.0
1 .2
3.3
1 .5

	 3.4
68.0

0.8
Day 1
0.7
69.0
<50
33
1 . 1
0.73
2.9
110.0
1 .4
0.6
2,200
25
21 .0
17
<0.2
Day 2
1
48
50
160
2
1
20
2
0
1
4,600
60
33
28
0
Day 3
.5
.0


.3
.5
.0
.4
.073
.4


.0

.4

-------
00
vo
to
                                      Table V-198 (Continued)


                                URANIUM SURFACE TREATMENT RINSEWATER
                                    RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
                                            Stream    Sample
Concentrations (mg/1)
Pol lutant

Nonconventional Pollutants
Titanium
Total Dissolved Solids
TDS
Total Organic Carbon
(TOO
Total Solids (TS)
V-3
V-4
V-4
V-3
V-4
V-4
(Continued)
1
2
2
1
2
2
Code

<0.2
<0.2
300.0
<10.0
<10.0
330.0
Type Source Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
21.0
1.5 7.6
5,600 9,800
180
30 <1
6,000 11,000

-------
                                  Table V-198 (Continued)

                             URANIUM SURFACE TREATMENT RINSE
                               RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
                                       Stream    Sample
Concentrations (mg/1)'
Pol lutant
Nonconventional (Continued)
Uranium
Vanadium
Yttrium
Gross Alpha
Gross Beta
00
<£>
UJ
Radium-226
Conventional Pollutants
Oi 1 and Grease
Total Suspended Solids
(TSS)
pH (standard units)
V-3
V-4
V-3
V-4
V-3
V-4
V-3
V-4
V-3
V-4
V-3
V-4
V-3
V-4
V-4
V-3
V-4
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
1
2
1
2
Code

0
0
<0
<0
<0
<0

0
0
<0
<0
<0
<0

<1
<1
<1
6
6
Type Source Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
.89 2,700
.89 900 760
.03 140.0
.03 2.9 5.8
. 1 2.4
.1 0.5 0.7
Concentrations (nCi/L)
.014 9,920
.014 794 1,960
.013 22,727
.013 1,150 2,700
.0008 0.105
.0008 0.018 0.00813
Concentrations (mg/1)
.0 <1
.0 10
.0 52 430
<1
4 4
1.   No analyses were performed on the following toxic pollutants:   1-113,  116,  and 129.

-------
                        Table  V-199



       URANIUM  SAWING  OR  GRINDING SPENT  EMULSIONS
Plant
1
2
3
Water
1/kkg
NR
NR
NR
Use
gal/ton
NR
NR
NR
Percent
Recycle
P
P
P
Wastewater
1/kkg
3.23
8.14
NR
Dischar
gal/to
0.774
1.95
NR
Periodic batch discharge
                           894

-------
                Table V-200

URANIUM SAWING OR GRINDING SPENT EMULSIONS
       RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
Pol 1 utant
Tox ic Pol lutants
23. chloroform
81. phenanthrene
114. antimony
115. arsenic
117. beryllium
118. cadmium
0° 119. chromium (total)
vo
01 120. copper
121. cyanide (total )
122. lead
123. mercury
124. nickel
1 25. sel enium
126. silver
127. thai 1 ium
" 1'28: zinc ' " 	
Nonconventional Pollutants
Acidity
Alkal inity
A 1 umi num
Ammonia Nitrogen
Barium
Stream
Code
V-6 1
V-6 1
V-6 1
V-6 1
V-6 1
V-6 1
V-6 1
V-6 1
V-6 1
V-6 1
V-6 1
V-6 1
V-6 1
V-6 1
V-6 1
' V-6 ' "" 1
V-6 1
V-6 1
V-6 1
V-6 1
V-6 1
Sample
0

<0
<0
0
<0
0
0
<0
0
<0
0
<0
<0
<0
0
<10
33
0
•o
0
Concentrations
Source
. 103
ND
.0006
.001
.012
.03
.061
.088
.01
.036
.005
.055
.001
.0005
.001
.'101
.0
.0
. 131
.07
.2
Day 1
ND
32.
0.
<0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
7.
<0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
7.
130
210
2.
<0.
Q.
(mg/1)
Day 2 Day 3
607
0014
001
028
07
1
9
03
3
005
2
001
0013
0018
5 	


4
02
2

-------
                                      Table V-200 (Continued)

                            URANIUM SAWING OR GRINDING SPENT EMULSIONS
                                   RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
00
Pol lutant
Stream
Code
Sample Concentrations (mg/1)

Type Source
Day 1 Pay 2 Day 3
Nonconventional Pol lutants (Continued)
Boron
Calcium
Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD)
Chloride
Cobal t
Fl uoride
Iron
Magnesium
Manganese
Molybdenum
Nitrate
Phosphorus
Sodium
Suifate
Tin
Ti tani urn
Total Organic Carbon (TOC)
Uranium
Vanadium
Yttrium
V-6
V-6
V-6
V-6
V-6
V-6
V-6
V-6
V-6
V-6
V-6
V-6
V-6
V-6
V-6
. V-6
V-6
V-6
V-6
V-6
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
<0.2
0.045
<50.0
36.0
0.044
0.41
0. 16
8.0
0.058
<0.03
<0.09
0.5
74.0
2.8
<0.25
<0.2
<10.0
0.89
<0.03
<0. 1
0.6
32.0
<50
260
0.2
10
14.0
23.0
0.7
0.15
280
3.3
750.0
31
<0.25
0.5
1,500
37.5
0.3
<0. 1

-------
                                      Table V-200  (Continued)


                            URANIUM SAWING OR GRINDING  SPENT  EMULSIONS

                                   RAW WASTEWATER  SAMPLING  DATA
               Pol 1utant
                                           Stream
                                            Code
                           Concentrations  (mg/1)
                                                                Source
                                                                          Day  1
                                          Day
    Nonconventional Pol 1utants  (Continued)


    Gross  Alpha                        V-6        1         0.014*


    Gross Beta                          V-6        1        <0.013*


    Radium-226                          V-6        1        <0.0008*
                                       70.3*


                                       176*


                                        0.0212*
00
to
>J
    Convent 1onal Po11utants


    Oi1  and Grease


    Total Suspended  Solids (TSS)


    pH (standard units)
V-6       1        <1.0


V-6       1        <1.0


V-6       1         6
7,500


  510


  7-8
    *concentrations are reported in nanocuries/1iter
    1.  The following toxic pollutants "were not-detected  i.n "this  waste  stream:   1-22,  24-80,

        and 82-88.


    2.  No analyses were performed on the following toxic .pollutants:   89-113,  116,  and 129.

-------
                           Table V-201

        URANIUM SAWING OR GRINDING CONTACT COOLING WATER
Plant

  1
    Water Use
1/kkg     gal/ton
  NR
NR
Percent
 Recycle

   NR
                    Wastewater Discharge
                      1/kkg      gal/ton
1,647
                                                395
                               898

-------
                           Table V-202

                URANIUM SAWING OR GRINDING RINSE
Plant

  1
    Water Use         Percent
1/kkg     gal/ton     Recycle
                     Wastewater Discharge
                      1/kkg k     gal/ton.
  NR
NR
4.65
1.12
P - Periodic batch discharge
                               899

-------
          Table V-203



URANIUM AREA CLEANING WASHWATER
Plant
1


Water
1/kkg
NR
NR
NR
Use
gal/ton
NR
NR*
NR
Percent
Recycle .
P
P
P
Wastewater
1/kkg
1.37
30.1
97.2
Dischar
gal/to
0.33
7.28
23.3
              900

-------
                                              Table V-204

                                   URANIUM AREA CLEANING WASTEWATER
                                     RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
u>


Toxic
22.


23.
66.


114.


115.


1 17.


118.


119.
-

120.


121 .



Pol lutant
Pol lutants
p-chloro-m-cresol


chloroform
bis(2-ethylhexyl)
phthalate

antimony


arsenic


beryl 1 ium


cadmium


chromium (total)
..-,--.

copper


cyanide (total )





V-8
V-18
V-19
V-8
V-8
V-18
V-19
V-8
V-18
V-19
V-8
V-18
V-19
V-8
V-18
V-19
V-8
V-18
V-19
V-8
	 V-18 -
V-19
V-8
V-18
V-19
V-8
V-18
V-19
Stream
Code

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
SampVe Concentrations (mg/1)
Type Source

ND
ND
ND
0.103
ND
ND
ND
<0.0006
<0.0006
<0.0006
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
0.012
0.012
0.012
<0.03_
<0.03
<0.03
0.061
0.061
0.061
0.088
0.088
0.088
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
Day 1 Day 2 Day 3

15.031
ND
. ND
ND
4.879
0.085
0.989

-------
                                        Table V-204 (Continued)

                                   URANIUM AREA CLEANING WASTEWATER
                                     RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
                 Pollutant

      Toxic Pollutants (Continued)
                                             Stream
                                              Code
                                                                     Concentrations (mg/l)
                                                           Source
\D
o
to
      122."  lead
      123.  mercury
      124.  nickel
125.   selenium
V-8
V-18
V-19
V-8
V-18
V-19
V-8
V-18
V-19
V-8
V-18
V-19
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
                                                 0.036
                                                 0.036
                                                 0.036
                                                <0.005
                                                <0.005
                                                <0.005
 0.055
 0.055
 0.055

<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
                                                                            3.4
                                                                           <0.005
                                                                            0.3
                                                                      0.0018
                                                                                          3.07
                                                                                          4. 1
                                                                                         <0.0005
                                                                                         <0.0005
                                                                                           0.5
                                                                                           0.5
                                                                                   <0.001
                                                                                    0.0033

-------
     Table V-204 (Continued)

URANIUM AREA CLEANING WASTEWATER
  RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
Pollutant
Toxic Pollutants (Continued)
126. silver V-8
V-18
V-19
127. thallium V-8
V-18
V-19
128. zinc V-8
V-18
- _ V-19
Nonconvent ional Pollutants
Acidity V-8
vo v~18
0 ' V-19
U)
Alkal inity V-8
V-,18
V-19
Aluminum V-8
V-18
V-19
Ammonia Nitrogen V-18
V-19
Barium V-8
V-18
V-19
Boron"" ~~ "'' "' ' V-8
V-18
V-19
Calcium V-8
V-18
V-19
Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) V-8
V-18
V-19
Stream Sample
Code Type
1 <0.0005
1 <0.0005
1 <0.0005
1 <0.001
1 <0.001
1 <0.001
1 0.101
1 0.101
1 0.101.
1 <10.0
1 <10.0
1 <10.0
1 33.0
1 33.0
1 33.0
1 0.131
1 0.131
1 0.131
1 0.07
1 0.07
1 0.2
1 0.2
1 0.2
r <0.2
1 <0.2
1 <0.2
1 0.045
1 0 . 045
1 0.045 '
• 1 <50.0
1 <50.0
1 • <50.0
Concentrations (mg/1)
Source Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
0.0011
0.001
O.OOQ8
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
11.0
5.2
4.0
<10
<10
<10
634
1,060
618
54.0 .
23.0
34.0
1 .2
2.1
1 .0
36.0
8.7
0:4
0.6
0.1
416.0
320.0
739.0
, <50
10
. 15

-------
                                      Table V-2Q4 (Continued)

                                 URANIUM AREA CLEANING WASTEWATER
                                   RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
               Pollutant

    Nonconventional Pol lutants  (Continued)
                                           Stream
                                            Code
           Source
                                                                   Concentrations  (mg/l)
    Chloride
    Cobalt
    Fluoride
V-8
V-18
V-19
V-8
V-18
V-19
V-B
V-18
V-19
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
36.0
36.0
36.0

 0.044
 0 .044
 0.044

 0.41
 0.41
 0.41
                                                                         97
                                                                           0.23
                                                                           6.4
                                                                                      445
                                                                                       74
                                                                                         0.4
                                                                                         0.4
                                                                                         1 .6
                                                                                         1.8
VO
O

-------
                                         Tabler V/-204 (Continueci)

                                    URANIUM AREA CLEANING .WASTEWATER
                                      RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
                  Pol 1utant
                                              Stream
                                               Code
Concentrations (mg/1)
                                                                  Source
VO
O
Ul
       Nonconventional  Pollutants (Continued)
       Iron
       Magnesium
       Manganese
       Molybdenum
       Nftrate
       Phosphorus
       Sodium
       Sulfate
       Tin
       Ti tanium
V-8
V-18
V-19
V-8
V-18
V-19
V-8
V-18
V-19
V-8
V-18
V-19
V-8
V-18
V-19
V-8
V-18
V-19
V-8
V-18
V-19
V-8
V-18
V-19
V-8
V-18
V-19
V-8
V-18
V-19
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0. 16
0.16
0.16
8.0
8.0
8.0
0.058
0.058
0.058
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<0.09
<0.09
<0.09
0.5
0.5
0.5
74.0
74.0
74.0
2.8
2.8
2.8
<0.25
<0.25
<0.25
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
                                                                            50.0
     151 .0
       1 .6
       0.5
                                                                           790
       2.5
                                                                         1 ,769.0
                                                                            21
                                                                            <0.25
                                                                             3.7
                                                                                          66.0
                                                                                          48.0
                                                                                         330.0
                                                                                       1,499.0
                     1 .8
                     2.3
                                                                                           0.5
                                                                                           0.6
                                                                                          77
                                                                                          75
                                                                                          39
                                                                                           2.6
                                                                                       3, 145.0
                                                                                      10,298.0
                                                                                           2.4
                                                                                           8.8
                                                                                          <0.25
                                                                                          <0.25
                                                                                           2.8
                                                                                           1.8

-------
                                       Table V-204 (Continued)

                                  URANIUM AREA CLEANING WASTEWATER
                                    RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
10
O
a\
                Pollutant
     Nonconventional Pol lutants (Continued)
     Total Dissolved Solids (TDS)
     Tota'l Organic Carbon  (TOO
     Total Solids (TS)
Urani um


mtinued
V-8
V-18
V-19
V-8
V-18
V-19
V-8
V-18
V-19
V-8
V-18
V-19
Stream
Code
)
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Sample
Type
300.0
300.0
300.0
<10.0
<10.0
<10.0
330.0
330.0
330.0
0.89
0.89
0.89
                                                                    Concentrations  (mg/1)
                                                                Source
                                                                       6,600
                                                                       2,700
                                                                       9,500
                                                                     49
                                                                                     3,400
                                                                                        680
                                                                                      4,400
                                                                                      3,100
                                                                                        130
                                                                                         79

-------
                                  Table V-204 (Continued)

                             URANIUM AREA.CLEANING  WASTEWATER
                               RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING  DATA
Pol lutant
Stream
Code
Samp] e
Type
Concentrations (mg/1)
Source Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
Nonconvent ional Pollutants (Continued)
Vanadium
Yttrium
Gross Alpha
Gross Beta
Radium-226
Conventional Pollutants
Oi 1 and Grease
Total Suspended Solids
pH (standard units)
V-8 1
V-18 1
V-19 1
V-8 1
V-18 1
V-19 1
V-8 1
V-18 1
V-19 1
V-8 1
V-18 . 1
V-19 1
V-8 1
V-18 1
V-19 1
V-8 1
V-18 1
V-19 1
(TSS) V-8 1
V-18 1
V-19 1
V-8 1
V-18- 1
V-19 1
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<0. 1
<0. 1
<0. 1

0.014
0.014
0.014
<0.013
<0.013
<0.013
<0.0008
<0.0008
<0.0008
<1 .0
<1 .0
<1 .0
<1 .0
<1 .0
<1 .0
6
6
6
<0.3
0.8
0.8
2.0
11.0
14.0
Concentrations (nCi/L)
76.4
227
315
109 .
314
479
0.03
0. 143
0. 183
6,000
17
25
775
60
1,600
10
10
9
1.   The following toxic pollutants were not  detected in this waste stream:  1-21, 24-65,
    and 67-88.

2.   No analyses were performed on the following toxic pollutants:   89-113, 116, and 129.

-------
                            Table V-205

          URANIUM WET AIR POLLUTION CONTROL SLOWDOWN
Plant

  1

  2
    Water Use
1/kkg     gal/ton
  NR

  NR
NR

NR
Percent
Recycle

  NR

   P
                     Wastewater Discharge
                      1/kkg      gal/ton
0

3.49
0

0.836
                               908

-------
                Table V-206

URANTUM-WET-AIR-POL.LUTION" CONTROL^BLOWboWN
       RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING  DATA
Pol 1 utant

Toxic Pollutants
114. ant imony
115. arsenic
1 17. beryl 1 ium
118. cadmium
119. chromium (total)
\O 120. copper
O
*° 121. cyanide (total)
122. lead
123. mercury
124. nickel
125. selenium
126. silver
"127. thallium
128. zinc


V-5
V-5
V-5
V-5
V-5
V-5
V-5
V-5
V-5
V-5
V-5
V-5
V-5
V-5
Stream Sample Concentrations (mg/1)
Code Type Source Day 1 Day 2 Day 3

1 <0.0006 <0.0006
1 <0.001 <0.001
1 0.012 0.02
1 <0.03 <0.03
1 0.061 <0.03
1 0.088 0.15
1 <0.01 <0.1
1 0.036 0.6
1 <0.005 <0.005
1 0.055 0.081
1 <0.001 <0.001
1 <0.0005 0.0007
1 <0.001 <0.0078
1 0.101 1.1
Nonconventional Pollutants
Acidity
Alkal inity
Al uminum
Ammonia Nitrogen
Barium
V-5
V-5
V-5
V-5
V-5
i 2,000
1 0.131 0.6
1 0.07 2.0
1 0.2 <0.1

-------
                                       Table V-206 (Continued)

                            URANIUM WET AIR POLLUTION CONTROL SLOWDOWN
                                    RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
vo
Po 1 1 ut ant

Stream Sam
Code Ty
pie Concentrations (mg/1)
pe Source Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
Nonconvent ional Pollutants (Continued)
Boron
Cal cium
Chemical Oxygen Demand
(COD)
Chloride
Cobalt
Fl uoride
Iron
Magnesium
Manganese
Mol ybdenum
Phosphorue
Sodium
Sulfate
Tin
V-5 1
V-5 1
V-5 1

V-5 1
V-5 1
V-5 1
V-5 1
V-5 1
V-5 . 1
V-5 1
V-5 1
V-5 1
V-5 1
V-5 1
<0.2
0.045
<50.0

36.0
0.044
0.41
0.16
8.0
0 . 058
<0.03
0.5
74.0
2.8
<0.25
0.6
0.8
120

4,100
0.088
31
0.4
0.78
0.1
0.23
3.4
141 .0
5.3
<0.2

-------
                                    Table  V-206  (Continued)

                         'URANIUM""WET AIR POLLUTION CONTROL SLOWDOWN
                                  RAW WASTEWATER  SAMPLING DATA
              Pollutant
Stream    Sample
 Code
                                                                  Concentrations  (mg/1)
Nonconvent ional Pollutants (Continued)
Titanium
Total Dissolved Solids
. • . " (TDS)
Total Organic Carbon
(TOC)
	 Total bo lids (.TbJ
VD
l_a Uranium
; ' -. Vanadi urn
" -"Yttrium
V-5
V-5
V-5
V-5
V-5
V-5
V-5
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
<0.2
300.0
<10.0
330.0
0.89
<0.03
<0. 1
Nonconvent ional Pollutants (Continued)

1 .2
510,000
280
510,000
1,000
0.16
0.2
Concentrations (nCi/L)
   Gross  Alpha             V-5        1

   Gross  Beta               V-5        1

-—Radium-226               V-5     — 1
  Conventional  Pol 1utants

  :0i1 and Grease          V-5

  Total Suspended  Solids  V-5
     (TSS)

  pH (standard  units)
   0.014       134

  <0.013     1,970

  <0.0008       0.011	

 	Concentrations  (mg/1)
    .0

    .0
              650
  1.  No analyses were performed on the following toxic pollutants:   1-113,  116,  and  129.

-------
                            Table V-207

                     URANIUM DRUM WASHWATER
Plant

  1
    Water Use
1/kkg     gal/ton
  NR
NR
Percent
Recycle

  >0
                     Wastewater Discharge
                      1/kkg      gal/ton
44.3
10.6
                                912

-------
         Table V-208

   URANIUM DRUM WASH WATER
RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA

- Pol lutant
Toxic Pol lutants
114. ant imony
115. arseni c
117. beryl 1 i urn
118. cadmium
119. chromium (total)
120. copper
121 . cyanide (total )
122. lead
1 23 . mercury
124. nickel
125. selenium
126. silver
127. thallium
128. zinc
Noncohvent iohaT Pollutants
Acidity
Alkal inity
Al uminum
Ammonia Nitrogen
Barium
Boron
Cal cium
Stream
Code

V-9 1
V-9 1
V-9 1
V-9 1
V-9 1
V-9 1
V-9 1
V-9 1
V-9 1
V-9 1
V-9 1
V-9 1
V-9 1
V-9 1
V-9 1
V-9 1
V-9 1
V-9 1
V-9 1
V-9 1
V-9 1
Sample Concentrations
Type Source Day 1

<0.0006 -
<0.001
0.012
<0.03
0.061
0.088
<0.01
0.036
<0.005
0.055
<0.001
<0.0005
<0.001
0.101
<10.0
33.0
0.131
0.07
0.2
<0. 2
0.045
(mg/1)
Day" 2

<0
<0
0
<0
0
0
<0
0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
0
<10
779
2
0
0
0
56

Day 3

.0006
.001
.013
.03
.06
.6
.1
.22
.005
.03
.001
.0005
.001
.8


.2
.30
.3
.04
.0

-------
                                       Table V-20B (Continued)

                                       URANIUM DRUM WASH WATER
                                    RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
                Pol 1utant

     Nonconventional Pollutants (Continued)


     Chemical Oxygen Demand  (COD)

     Chioride

     Cobalt

     Fluoride

     Iron

     Magnesium
                                            Stream
                                             Code
                                                                    Concentrations  (mg/1)
Source
                   Dav
V-9
V-9
V-9
V-9
V-9
V-9
1 <50.0
1 - 36.0
1 0 . 044
1 0.41
1 0. 16
1 8.0
                        10

                       850

                         0.041

                         3.5

                         4.3

                        28.6
VD
H

-------
                                         Table  V-208 (Continued)
VD
-- --- - 	 -- 	 	 	 - 	 URA"NrUIWTDR'UlvrWASH WATER"
RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
Pol 1 utant wu^c
Stream
TriHo
Nonconvent ional Pollutants ("Continued)
Manganese
Mol ybdenum
Nitrate
Phosphorus
Sodium
Sulfate "-.'-. ..
Tin
Ti tanium
Total Dissolved Solids (TDS)
Total Organic Carbon (TOC)
Total Solids (TS)
Uranium
Vanadi urn
Yttrium ;
Gross Alpha
Gross Beta
Radium-226
V-9
•V-9
V-9
V-9
V-9
V-9
V-9
V-9
V-9
V-9
V-9
V-9
V-9
V-9
V-9
V-9
V-9
Sample
Concentrations (mg/1)
Type Source Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
1 0.058 0.2
1 <0.03
1 <0.09
1 0.5
1 74.0
1 2.8
1 <0.25
1 <0.2
1 300.0
1 <10.0
1 330.0
1 0.89
1 <0.03
1 <0.1

1 0.014
1 <0.013
1 <0.0008
<0.03
4.3
310
678.0
5.4
<0.2
<0.2
2,100
2
2,300
5.7
	 0.03 	
0. 1
Concentrations (nCi/L)
3.7
4.5
0.0019

-------
                                       Table V-208 (Continued)
                                       URANIUM DRUM WASH WATER
                                    RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
                Pollutant


     Nonconventional Pollutants (Continued)

     Conventional Pollutants

     Oi1 and Grease                      V-9

     Total Suspended Solids (TSS)        V-9

     pH (standard units)                 V-9
Stream
Code
1
1
1
Sample Concentrations (mg/1)
Type Source Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
Concentrations (mg/1)
<1.0 12
<1.0 23
6 9-10
vo
     1.  No analyses were performed for the following toxic pollutants:   1-113,  116, and  129.

-------
                           Table V-209

                    URANIUM LAUNDRY WASHWATER
Plarit

  1 '
              Water Use
         liters/    gallons/
        employee-   employee-
day
52.4
day

12.6
Percent
Recycle
                                     Wat'er Use
                                libers/    gallons/
                               employee-   employee-
day
                                             52.4
                                              day
                                              12.6
                              917

-------
                                            Table V-210

                                     URANIUM LAUNDRY  WASH  WATER
                                    RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
00
Pol lutant
Toxic Pollutants
114. antimony
115. arsenic
117. beryl 1 ium
118. cadmium
119. chromium (total)
120. copper
121 . cyanide (total )
122. lead
123. mercury
124. nickel
1 25 . sel enium
126. silver
127. thallium
128. zinc
Nonconvent ional Pollutants
Acidity
Alkal inity
Aluminum
Ammonia Nitrogen
Barium
Boron
V-7
V-7
V-7
V-7
V-7
V-7
V-7
V-7
V-7
V-7
V-7
V-7
V-7
V-7

V-7
V-7
V-7
V-7
. V-7
V-7
Stream
Code
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

1
1
1
1
1
1
Sample Concentrations (mg/1)
Type Source
<0.0006
<0.00l
0.012
<0.03
0.061
0.088
<0.01
0.036
<0.005
0.055
<0.001
<0.0005
<0.001
0.101

<10.0 <
33.0
0.131
0.07
0.2
<0.2
Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
<0.0006
0.028
0.015
<0.03
<0.03
0.25
<0.1
0.042
<0.005
<0.03
<0.001
0.0048
<0.001
0.7

:10
59
0.9
2.3
0.2
0.3

-------
                                     Table V-210  (Continued)
                                   URANIUM LAUNDRY WASH WATER
              Po1 1 utant
   Nonconvent i onal Pol lutants (Continued)
   Calcium
   Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD)
   Chloride
   Cobal t
   Fl uoride
   Iron
   Magnesium
   Manganese
SW -WAS i -CWft i CK -inMHi--i r.u
Stream Sample
Code Tvoe
inued)
V-7
V-7
V-7
V-7
V-7
V-7
V-7
V-7
1 0
1 <50
1 36
1 0
1 0
1 0
1 8
1 0
ISA i rc-
Concentrations (mg/1)
Source
.045 17.
.0
.0
.044
.41
.16
.0
.058
<50
210
0.
0.
0.
5.
0.
Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
0


25
79
16
3
2
VO

-------
                                       Table V-210 (Continued)

                                     URANIUM LAUNDRY WASH WATER
                                    RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
t>J
Pol lutant
Stream
Code
Sample
Concentrations (mg/1)
Source Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
Nonconventional Pol lutants (Continued)
Mol ybdenum
Nitrate
Phosphorus
Sodium
Sulfate
Tin
Ti tanium
Total Dissolved Solids (TDS)
Total Organic Carbon (TOC)
Total Solids (TS)
Uranium
Vanadium
Yt tri urn
Gross Alpha
Gross Beta
Radium-226
Conventional Pol 1 utants
Oi 1 and Grease
Total Suspended Solids (TSS)
pH (standard units)
V-7 1
V-7 1
V-7 1
V-7 1
V-7 1
V-7 1
V-7 1
V-7 1
V-7 1
V-7 1
V-7 1
V-7 1
V-7 1
V-7 1
V-7 1
V-7 1

V-7 1
V-7 1
V-7 1
<0.03
<0.09
0.5
74.0
2.8
<0.25
<0.2
300.0
<10.0
330.0
0.89
<0.03
<0.1

0.014
<0.013
<0.03
<0.09
12
133.0
14
<0.2
<0.2
590
46
630
0.51
<0.03
7.3
Concentrations (nCi/L)
13.7
18.5
<0.0008 3.6


<1 .0
<1 .0
6
Concentrations (mg/1)

42
1 1
6
      1.  No analyses were performed on the following toxic pollutants:  1-113,  116, and  129.

-------
                             Table  V-211     ;

                   ZINC  ROLLING  SPENT  NEAT  OILS
Plant

  i ;
    Water Use
1/kkg     gal/ton
 NR
NR
Percent
Recycle

  100
                      Wastewater Discharge
                       1/kkg     • gal/ton
                                     0
                                                            0
NR -'Data not reported
                               921

-------
                            Table V-212

                  ZINC ROLLING SPENT EMULSIONS
Plant

  1

  2

  3
    Water Use
1/kkg     gal/ton
 NR
 NR
NR

NR

NR
Percent
Recycle

  100

    P

   NR
                     Wastewater Discharge
                      1/kkg      gal/ton
0

1.39 (CH)

NR (LA)
0

0.334 (CH)

NR (LA)
NR - Data not reported
CH - Contract hauled
LA - Land application
 P - Periodically discharged
                               922

-------
                           Table V-213

               ZINC ROLLING CONTACT COOLING. WATER
   ;   '  ./   i  ' Water Use
Plant ,.   1/kkg     gal/ton
           ,471

            600

           1  NR
113

144

 NR
Percent
Recycle

   0

   0

   P
                    : Wastewater Discharge
                    :  1/kkg      gal/ton
471

600

 NR
113

144

 NR
NR -iData not reported
 P -;Periodically discharged
                               923

-------
                            Table V-214

                  ZINC DRAWING SPENT EMULSIONS
Plant

  1

  2

  3

  4
    Water Use
1/kkg     gal/ton
  NR

  NR

  NR

  NR
NR

NR

NR

NR
Percent     Wastewater Discharge
Recycle      1/kkg      gal/ton

   P         5.80 (CH)  1.39 (CH)

   P         NR (CH)    NR (CH)

   P         NR         NR

   P         NR         NR
NR - Data not reported
CH - Contract hauled
 P - Periodically discharged
                                924

-------
                             Table V-215

         'ZINC DIRECT CHILL CASTING CONTACT COOLING WATER
Plant ;
      •i

  1

  2
    Water Use
1/kkg     gal/ton
  NR!

 505
 NR

121
Percent
Recycle

  100

    0
                      Wastewater Discharge
                       1/kkg      gal/ton
.  0

:505
  0

121
NR - Data not reported
                               925

-------
                            Table V-216

          ZINC STATIONARY CASTING CONTACT COOLING WATER
Plant

  1
    Water Use
1/kkg     gal/ton
 NR
NR
Percent
Recycle

  100
                      Wastewater Discharge
                       1/kkg      gal/ton
0 (+-)
0 ( + )
NR - Data not reported
 + - Loss due to evaporation
                               926

-------
                           Table V-217       ,;

            ZINC HEAT TREATMENT CONTACT COOLING WATER
Plant

  1 •
    Water Use         Percent
l/.kkg     gal/ton     Recycle
                      Wastewater Discharge
                       l/kkg      gal/ton
 NR
NR
763
183
NR - Data not reported
 P - Periodically discharged
                               927

-------
                              Table V-218

                 ZINC  SURFACE  TREATMENT SPENT BATHS
            Plant

              1
Wastewater Discharge
 1/kkg      gal/ton
                                       65.1

                                       70.9

                                     130

                                       NR
               15.6

               17.0

               31.2

               NR
NR - Data not reported
                               928

-------
                             Table .V-219

                    ZINC SURFACE TREATMENT
                                RINSE
 Plant
  .  Water Use
1/kkg     gal/ton
           4,170

           5,000

           1/570
           1,000

           1,200

             376
Percent
Recycle

   0

   0

   0
NR - Data not reported
                               929
Wastewater Discharge
 1/kkg      gal/ton
 4,170

 5,000

 1,570
1,000

1,200

  376

-------
                                               Table V-220
                                      ZINC SURFACE TREATMENT RINSE
                                      RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
VD
OJ
O
           Pollutant

Toxic Pollutants

  3.   aery 1oni triIe

  4.   benzene'

  6.   carbon  tetrachloride

  7.   chlorobenzene

 10.   1 , 2-dichloroethane

 11.   1 , 1 , 1-trichloroethane

 13.   1 , 1-dichloroethane

 14.   1,1,2-trichloroethane

 15.   1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane

 18.   bis(2-chloroethy1)ether

 23.   chloroform

 29.   1,1-dichloroethy1ene

 30.   1 , 2-trans-dichloroethy1ene

 32.   1 , 2-dichloropropane

 33.   1 ,3-dichloropropene

 34.   2,4-dimethylphenol

 36.   2,6-dinitrotol uene

 37.   1,2-dipheny1hydrazine

 38.   ethylbenzene

 39.   fluoranthene

 43.   bis(2-ch1oroethoxy)methane

 44.   methylene  chloride
Stream
Code
G-3
G-3
G-3
G-3
G-3
G-3
G-3
G-3
G-3
G-3
G-3
G-3
G-3
G-3
G-3
G-3
G-3
G-3
G-3
G-3
G-3
G-3
Sample Concentrations (mg/1)
Type Source
1 0.002
1 0.017
1 0.004
1 **
1 **
1 0.003
1 0.001
! **
1 0.001
1 NO
1 0.051
1 0.002
1 0.002
1 0.002
1 **
1 ND
1 0.002
1 **
1 0.011
1 0.001
1 **
1 0.003
Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
0.001
0.015
0.003
**
** .!
ND
0.001
**
0.001
0.001
0.015
0.002
0.002
**
* *
0.005
0.002
**
0.011
ND
0.001
o: 008

-------
                                       Table  V-220  (Continued)

                                  "ZINC SURFACE TREATMENT 'RTNSE
                                  RAW  WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
            Pol lutant

 Toxi c Pol 1 utants -(Continued) -	


  46.   methyl  bromide (bromomethane)

  47.   bromoform (tribromomethane)

  48.   dich1orobromomethane

  51.   chlorodibromomethane

  55.   naphthalene

  66.   bis(2-ethyIhexy1) phthalate

  67.   butyl  benzyl  phthalate

  68.   di-n-butyl phthalate

  69.-  di-n-octyl phthalate:          -

  70.   diethyl  phthalate

  72.   benzo(a)anthracene

  74.   benzo(b)f1uoranthene

	7.5., _. ._b.e.Qza£.klf-Luoj:.aathan.e		-

  76.   chrysene  •

  78.   anthracene

  79.   benzo(ghi)pery 1 ene

  80.   fluorene

  81.   phenanthrene

  83.   indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene

  84. :  pyrene

  85.   tetrach1oroethy1ene

  86.   to 1uene
Stream Sample
Code Type
G-3 1
G-3 1
G-3 1
G-3 1
G-3 1
G-3 ' -1
G-3 1
G-3 1
G-3 1
G-3 1
G-3 ' 1
G-3 1
.S--3- 	 7—1 	 -
G-3 . 1
G-3 1
G-3 _ _ 1:;
G-3 1
G-3 '-I
G-3 1
G-3 ' ;i
G-3 ; 1
G-3 '< ' \
Concentrations (mg/1)
Source
**
0.002
0.005
0.031
**
0.003
0.001 '
0.017
**
0.009
0.001
0.002
— -0-.-002-
0.001
0.001
0.007
0.001
0.001
0.016
0.001
0.009
0.007
Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
ND
0.002
0.001
0 . 1 40
0.001
**
0.002
0.037
ND
0.016
0.001
ND
	 — N0— : — 	 - — 	 —
0.001 .
* *
ND : . . : .
ND
* *; • '
ND
ND
0.009
0.002

-------
                                            Table V-2:.'U I continued)

                                        ZINC SURFACE TREATMENT RINSE
                                        HAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
                                            .  S t p earn 	Samp,l e
Concentrations (mg/1]
               'Day 2
VO

Toxic
87.
1 14.
115.
117.
118.
1 19.
120.
121.
122.
123.
124.
125.
126.
127.
128.
Po 1 1 utant
Pollutants (Continued)
trichloroethylene
antimony
arseni c
bery 1 1 iurn
cadmi um
chromium (total )
copper
cyanide (total )
lead
mercury
ni eke 1
se! eni um
si 1 ver
thai 1 i um
zinc
Code

G-3
G-3
G-3
G-3
G-3
G-3
G-3
G-3
G-3
G-3
G-3 •
G-3
G-3
G-3
G-3
Type Source

1 0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 <0
1 0

.009
.010
.010
.005
.020
.020
.050
.07
.050
.0002
.050
.010
.010
.010
. 100
Day 1

0.008
<0.010
<0.010
<0.005
<0.020
0. 160
<0.050
<0.03
<0.050
<0.0002
8.10
<0.010
<0.010
<0.050
42.3
Nonconvent i ona 1 Pollutants
Acidity
Alkalinity
A 1 umi num
Aminoni
Bari um
a Nitrogen

G-3
G-3
G-3
G-3
G-3
1 <1
1 67
1 0
1 <0
1 <0


.100
.02
.050
<1
26
0.500
<0.02
<0.050

-------
     Table V-220 (Continued)

-ZING -SURFACE -TREATMENT RINSE
 RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
Pol lutant
Stream
Code
Sample Concentrations (mg/1)
Type Source
Nonconvent ional Pol lutants (Continued)
Boron
Calcium
Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD)
Chloride
Cobal t
\O F 1 uoride
CO
**> Iron
Magnesium
Manganese
Mo 1 ybdenum
Pheno 1 i cs
Phosphate
Sodium
Sulfate
Tin
Titanium
Total Dissolved Solids (TDS)
Total Organic Carbon (TOC)
Tota.l Solids (TS)
Vanadium
Vttrium
G-3
G-3
G-3
G-3
G-3
G-3
G-3
G-3
G-3
G-3
G-3
G-3
G-3
: G^3
; G-3
G-3
G-3
G-3
G-3
: G-3
G-3
1 0.100
1 29. 1
1 560
1 36
1 <0.050
1 96
1 < 0.050
1 4. 10
-- '-- 1 - < 0.050
1 < 0.050
1 < 0.005
1 1.6
1 6 00
1 47
1 < 0.050
1 < 0.050
1 160
1 < 1
1 92
1 < 0.050
;i < 0.050
Day 1 Day 2 Day 3

0.100
30.0
<1
<1
<0.050
108
0. 150
4.30
< 0.050 -- •"• 	
< 0.050
< 0.005
300
Q_ . i.rv - 	 	 — 	 	 - — • 	 — -• - -------- 	 _....._. — — ... . , ... - ... — . . — .._,._ .-„-...__,
CJ-". (-y- . , • : ,
1
49 ; '
< 0.050
< 0.050 . . ^ 	 	 . .. : :, 	 . .
380 . . '. :
< i ' • .. :
400
< 0.050
< 0.050

-------
                                         Table V-220 (Continued)

                                     ZINC SURFACE TREATMENT RINSE
                                     RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
                Pol 1utant

     Conventional  Pollutants

     011  and  Grease

     Total  Suspended  Solids  (TSS)

     pH  (standard  units)
Stream
Code
G-3
G-3
G-3
Sample Concentrations (mg/ 1 )
Type Source
1 4
1 10
1 7.98
Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
< 1
20
5.72
CO
**Present,  but not quantifiable.

1.   The following toxic pollutants were not detected in this waste stream:   1,  2,  5,  8,  9,
    12, 16,  17, 19-22, 24-28,  31,  35,  40-42, 45,  49, 50,  52-54,  56-65,  71,  73,  77,  82,  and
    88.

2.   No analyses were performed on  the  following toxic pollutants:   89-113,  116, and 129.

-------
              Table V-221     :
                              i


 ZINC ALKALINE CLEANING SPENT ;BATHS
Plan.t


  1



  2
Wastewater Discharge

 1/kkg      :gal/ton
 1.67


 5.42
0.400


1.30
                 935

-------
                           Table V-222

                   ZINC ALKALINE CLEANING RINSE
Plant
1
2
Water
1/kkg
2,290
1,080
Use
gal/ton
549
260
Percent
Recycle
CCR2
0 (S)
Wastewater
1/kkg
2,290
1,080
Discha
gal/t
549
260
CCR2 - Two-stage countercurrent cascade rinsing
   S - Spray rinsing
                               936

-------
                                              Table V-223

                                     ZINC ALKALINE CLEANING  RINSE
                                     RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
W
Tox i c
1 .
3.
4.
6.
7.
10.
1.1 .
13.
14.
15.
18.
23.
29.
30.
32.
33.
36.
37.'
•38.
39.
43.
44 .
Pol lutant
Pol lutants
acenaphthene
aery 1 oni t r i 1 e
benzene
carbon tet rachl ori de
chlorobenzene
1 , 2-di chl oroethane
1 , 1 , 1-trichloroethane
1 , 1 -di chl oroethane
1 ,1 ,2-trichloroethane
1,1,2, 2-tet rachl oroethane
bis(2-chloroethyl )ether
ch 1 orof orm
1 ,1-dichloroethylene
1 ,2-trans-dichloroethylene
1 ,2-dichloropropane
1 , 3-di ch 1 oropr'opehe
2 , 6-dini troto 1 uene
1 ,2-diphenyl-hydrazine
ethyl benzene "
f luoranthene
bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane
m&thylene chloride
S Cream
Code
G-2 •
G-2 "
G-2 '
G-2
G-2
G-2
G-2
G-2
G-2
G-2
G-2
G-2
G-2
G-2
G-2
G-2
G-2
G-2
	 ; -'G-2 '
, G-2
G-2
• G-2
Sarnpl e
1
- ; 	 1 " "
1
1
1
1
1
i
1
i
i
; i
i
i
i
i
. .- 1
; : i
1 	 ' 1
: "!
1
. 1
Concentrations (mg/lj
Source
ND
0.002
0.017
0.004
**
**
0.003
0.001
**
0.001
ND
0.051
0.002
0.002
0.002
**
0.002
**
0.011
0.001
**
0.003
Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
**
0.001
0.004
0.003
**
**
0.003
0.001
**
0.001
**
0.013
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.001 ;
0.003 '
** ',.
0.011,
0.001 -
0.001
0.008

-------
                                         Table V-223 (Continued)

                                      ZINC ALKALINE CLEANING RINSE
                                      RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
VD
OJ
CO
           Pol 1utant

Toxic Pol 1utants (Continued)

 46.  methyl bromide (bromomethane)

 47.  bromoform (tribromomethane)

 48.  dichlorobromomethane

 51.  chlorodibromomethane

 55.  naphthalene

 66.  bis(2-ethy1hexyl) phthalate

 67.  butyl benzyl phthalate

 68.  di-n-butyl phthalate

 69.  di-n-octyl phthalate

 70.  diethyl phthalate

 72.  benzo(a)anthracene

 74.  benzo(b)f)uoranthene

 75.  benzo(k)f1uoranthene

 76.  chrysene

 78.  anthracene

 79.  benzo(ghi)perylene

 80.  fluorene .

 81.  phenanthrene

 83.  indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene

 84.  pyrene

 85.  tetrachloroethy 1 ene

 86.  toluene
                                                                    Concentrations  (mg/1)
Code
G-2
G-2
G-2
G-2
G-2
G-2
G-2
G-2
G-2
G-2
G-2
G-2
G-2
G-2
G-2
G-2
G-2
G-2
G-2
G-2
G-2
G-2
Type
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1.
Source
**
0.002
0.005
0.031
**
0.003
0.001
0.017
**
0.009
0.001
0.002
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.007
0.001
0.001
0.016
0.001
0.009
0.007
Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
**
0.002
0.002
0.090
0.002
0.075
0.001
ND
ND
0.011
0.005
ND
ND
ND
0.001
ND
ND
0.003
0.016
• ND
0.009
0.004

-------
   Table V-223  (Continued)

ZINC ALKALINE CLEANING RINSE
RAW-WASTEWAT.ER'  SAMPLING-DATA"
Pol 1 utant .
Toxic Pollutants (Continued)
87. t ri ch 1 oroethy 1 ene
114. ant i mony
115. arseni c
117. bery 1 1 i um
118. cadmi um
119. chromium (total)
120. copper
^ 121 . cyani'de : (total )
^ 122. lead;
123. mercury -
124. nickel
1.25. selenium
126. silver
12 7 thallium
128. zinc
Nonconvent i onal Pollutants
Acidi ty
' Al kal ini ty
Aluminum
Ammonia Nitrogen
Bari um
Boron
Stream Sample
Code Type
G-2 1
G-2 1
G-2 1
G-2 1
G-2 1
G-2 1
G-2 1
G-2 1
G-2 1
- G-2 1
G-2 1
G-2 1
G-2 1
G-2 1
G-2 1
G-2 1
G-2 1
G-2 1
G-2 1
G-2 1
Concentrations (mg/1)
Source
0.009
<0.010
<0.010
<0.005
<0.020
<0.020
<0.050
0.07
<0.050
<0.0002
<0.050
<0 . 0 1 0
<0.010
- <0.-0-10---
0. 100
<}
67
0. 100
<0.02
<0.050
0. 100
Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
0.006
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
1 .
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
1 .
<1
84
0.
<0.
<0.
0.
010
010
005
020
020
050
3
050
0002
050
010
010
12

:
100
02
050
100

-------
   Table V-223 (Continued)

ZINC ALKALINE CLEANING RINSE
RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
Pol 1 utant
Nonconvent ional Pollutants (Continued)
Cal cium
Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD)
Chloride
Cobalt
Fl uoride
Iron
Magnesium
VD
^ Manganese
O
Mol ybdenum
Phenol ics
Phosphate
Sodium
Sulfate
Tin
Ti tani uin
Total Dissolved Solids (TDS)
Total Organic Carbon (TOC)
TotaV Sol ids (TS)
Vanadi urn
Yttrium
Stream
Code
G-2
G-2
G-2
G-2
G-2
G-2
G-2
G-2
G-2
G-2 .
G-2
G-2
G-2
G-2
G-2
G-2
G-2
G-2
G-2
G-2
Sample Concentrations (mg/1)
Type Source
1 ' 29 . 1
1 560
1 36
1 <0.050
1 96
1 <0.050
1 4. 10
1 <0.050
1 <0.050
1 <0.005
1 1 .6
1 6.00
1 47
1 <0.050
1 <0.050
1 160
1 <1
1 92
1 <0.050
1 <0.050
Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
29.0
<1
<1
<0.050
95
0.550
4. 10
<0.050
<0.050
<0.005
3.5
14.2
53
<0.050
<0.050
190
54
280
<0.050
<0.050

-------
                                           Table V-223 (Continued)


	 -- - -
Pol lutant
ZINC ALKALINE
- - RAW WASTEWATER
Stream
Code
CLEANING
-SAMPLING
Sample
RINSE
DATA

Concentrations (mg/1)
Source
Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
Conventional Pollutants
Oil
and Grease
Total Suspended Solids (TSS)
PH
(standard units)
G-2
G-2
G-2
1
1
1
4
10
7.98
23
90
7.55
VD
       **Present, but not quantifiable.

       1.  The following toxic pollutants were not detected in this waste stream:  2,  5,  8,  9,  12,
           16, 17,  19-22, 24-28,  31,  34,  35,  40-42,  45,  49, 50,  52-54,  56-65, 71, 73,  77,  82,  and
           88.             .
       2.  No analyses were performed on the following toxic pollutants:  89-113, 116,  and 129.

-------
                           Table V-224

             ZINC SAWING OR GRINDING SPENT EMULSIONS
Plant

  1
    Water Use
1/kkg     gal/ton
 NR
NR
Percent
Recycle

100 (P)
                      Wastewater Discharge
                       1/kkg      gal/ton
23.8
5.71
NR - Data not reported
 P - Periodically discharged
                               942

-------
                             Table V-225

                      ZINC ELECTROCOATING RINSE
Plant

  1 '
    Water Use
1/kkg     gal/ton
2,294
                      550
Percent
Recycle

   0
Wastewater Discharge
; 1/kkg  •'    gal/ton
                                             2,294
                                                550
                             943

-------
                           Table V-226

            ZIRCONIUM-HAFNIUM ROLLING SPENT NEAT OILS
 Plant

   1

Average
    Water Use
L/kkg     gal/ton
  NR

  NR
NR

NR
Percent
Recycle

  0.0
                    Wastewater Discharge*
                      L/kkg     gal/ton
0.00

0.00
0.00

0.00
NR - Data not reported

*Discharge from operation.
                               944

-------
                           Table V-227        :

           ZIRCONIUM-HAFNIUM DRAWING  SPENT  LUBRICANTS
 Plant:

   1
   2
   3

Average
    Water Use
L/kkg     gal/ton
  NR
  NR
  NR

  NR
NR
NR
NR

NR
Percent
Recycle

  0.0
  NR
  NR
                    Wastewater Discharge*
                      ;L/kkg     gal/ton
  0.00
  R
 NR

:  o.oo
 o.oo
NR
NR

 0.00
NR - Data not reported

*Discharge from operation.
                              945

-------
                           Table V-228

          ZIRCONIUM-HAFNIUM EXTRUSION SPENT LUBRICANTS
 Plant

   1
   2
   3
   3
   4

Average
    Water Use
L/kkg     gal/ton
  NR
   4.74
  NR
  NR
  NR

   4.74
NR
 1.14
NR
NR
NR

 1.14
Percent
Recycle

  0.0
  0.0
  0.0
  0.0
  0.0
                    Wastewater Discharge*
                      L/k'
-------
     •                      Table V-229

    ZIRCONIUM-HAFNIUM EXTRUSION PRESS HYDRAULIC FLUID LEAKAGE
 Plant

   1

Average
    Water Use
L/kkg     gal/ton
 237.4

 237.4
56.94

56.94
Percent
Recycle

  0.0
                    Wastewater Discharge*
                      L/kkg     gal/ton
237.4

237.4
56.94

56.94
*Discharge from operation.
                               947

-------
                                         Table V-230

                  ZIRCONIUM-HAFNIUM EXTRUSION PRESS HYDRAULIC FLUID LEAKAGE
                                   RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
                 Pol 1utant
                                             Stream
                                              Code
                                                           	Concentrations  (mg/1)
                                                           Sounds    Day  1     Day  2
      Noneonvent ional Po11utants

      Fluoride
                                         AK-3
                                                                       2.3
vo
•J5.
OS
Conventi onal Po11utants

011  and Grease

Total Suspended Solids  (TSS)

pH
AK-3

AK-3

AK-3
10.0

 7.0

 6.8

-------
 Plant -

   1 '

Average
                           Table V-231
                                             ]

            ZIRCONIUM-HAFNIUM SWAGING SPENT NEAT OILS
    Water Use
L/kkg     gal/ton
  NR

  NR
NR

NR
Percent
Recycle

  0.0
                    Wastewater Discharge*
                      L/kkg     gal/ton
NR - iData not reported

*Discharge from operation.
0.00

0.00
0.00

0.00
                               949

-------
                           Table V-232

        ZIRCONIUM-HAFNIUM TUBE REDUCING SPENT LUBRICANTS
 Plant

   1
   2
   3
   4
   5
   3
     Water Use
 L/kkg     gal/ton
   NR
2,364
1,051
3,315
7,359
   NR
Average   3,522
   NR
  566.9
  252.0
  794.9
1,765
   NR

  844.6
Percent
Recycle

  0.0
  0.0
  0.0
  0.0
  0.0
  NR
                       Wastewater Discharge*
                         L/kkg     gal/ton
    0.00
  298.3
1,051
3,315
7,359
   NR

3,006
    0.00
   71.52
  252.0
  794.9
1,765
   NR

  720.8
NR - Data not reported

*Discharge from operation.
                               950

-------
        :               Table V-233

     'ZIRCONIUM-HAFNIUM HEAT TREATMENT CONTACT COOLING WATER
Plant
1 ;
2
1 ,
1
3
3
Water
L/kkg
135.2
285.4
400.7
6,0,05
'NR
NR
Use
gal/ton
32.43
68.43
96.10
1,440
NR
NR
Percent V
Recycle
P
P
0.0
0.0 6,
NR
NR
astewater
L/kkg
135.2
285.4
400.7
005
NR
NR
Discharge*
gal/ton
32.43
68.43
96.10
1,440
NR
NR
Average   1,707
409.2
 P - .Periodic discharge
NR - Data not reported

*Discharge from operation.
1,
                               951
707
409.2

-------
                                           Table  V-234

                    ZIRCONIUM-HAFNIUM  HEAT TREATMENT CONTACT COOLING WATER
                                   RAW  V/ASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
                Pollutant

     Toxic Pollutants
                                             Stream
                                              Code
                                                               Concentrations (mg/1)
                                                           Source    Day 1    Day 2
      117.     beryllium
      118.     cadmi urn
      119.     chromiurn (total)
vo
U1
NJ
120.
      122.
      1 24.
      128.
        copper
              lead
              nickel
BV-1
BV-2
BV-3
AK-4

BV-1
BV-2
BV-3
AK-4

BV-1
BV-2
BV-3
AK-4

BV-1
BV-2
BV-3
AK-4

BV-1
BV-2
BV-3
AK-4

BV-1
BV-2
BV-3
AK-4

BV-1
BV-2
BV-3
AK-4
<0.010
<0.001
<0.001
<0.020

 0.061
<0.005
<0.005
<0.010

 0.670
 0.110
 0. 280
<0.020

 0. 180
 0.012
 0.080
 0.420

 3.500
<0.050
<0.050
<0.020

 0.490
 0.031
<0.012
<0.020

 ,0.035
 0.024
 0.040
 0. 170

-------
            Table V-234 (Continued)

ZIRCONIUM-HAFNIUM HEAT TREATMENT CONTACT COOLING WATER
              RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
iv • • - ,-„_.-,.. , . , - - , - ... g-j. ream
Po 1 1 utant Code
Tox ic Pol 1 utants
Aluminum . BV-1
BV-2
-BV-3
AK-4
- Hafnium BV-1
BV-2
BV-3
Iron BV-1
VO BV~2

-------
                                   Table V-234 (Continued)

                       ZIRCONIUM-HAFNIUM HEAT TREATMENT CONTACT COOLING WATER
                                     RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
                   Pollutant
                                               Stream
                                                Code
Concentrations (nig/1)
                                                                   Source
        Toxic Pollutants
        Zi rconi urn
                                                 BV-1
                                                 BV-2
                                                 BV-3
                                                 AK-4
      1 .600
     87.000
      0.052
     <0.100
VD
Ul
        1.     No   analyses  were  performed  for  the  following   toxic
        pollutants:   1-116, 121, 123, 125-127 and 129.

-------
                           Table V-235

         ZIRCONIUM-HAFNIUM SURFACE TREATMENT\SPENT BATHS
                  Plant

                    1
                    2
                    1
                    3
                    4
                    5
                    6
                    1
                    6
                    3
                    7
                    8
                    4
                    8
                    4

                Average
  Wastewater Discharge*
   L/kkg     gal/ton
 ..101.8
   235.6
   239.2
   282.7
   340.0
   375.9
   493.4
   693.9
   883.7
64,260
    NR
    NR
    NR
    NR
    NR

 6,791
    24,40
    56;49
    57136
    67; 78
    8ll54
    90*14
   118,3
   166,4
   2111 9
15,410!
    NR;
    NR;
    NR
    NR:
    NR,

 1,628'
NR - Data not reported

*Dis(?harge from operation.
                               955

-------
                                                Table V-236

                              ZIRCONIUM-HAFNIUM SURFACE TREATMENT SPENT BATHS
                                        RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
O\
           Pollutant


Toxic Pollutants

2.    acroleln


4.    benzene


7.    chlorobenzene


11.   1,1,1-trichloroethane


13.   1,1-dichloroethane


23.   chloroform


38.   ethylbenzene


44.   methylene chloride


48.   dichlorobromomethane


57.   2-nitrophenol


66.   bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
Stream
Code
P-2
P-3
P-2
P-3
P-2
P-3
P-2
P-3
P-2
P-3
P-2
P-3
P-2
P-3
P-2
P-3
P-2
P-3
P-2
P-3
P-2
Sample Concentrations (mg/1)
Type Source
1 ND
1 ND
1 ND
1 ND
1 ND
1 ND
1 ND
1 ND
1 ND
1 ND
1 0.023
1 0.023
1 ND
1 ND
1 ND
1 ND
1 0.002
1 0.002
1 ND
1 ND
1
Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
ND
0.021
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
0.023
0.390
ND
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
0.018
0.480
0.016
ND
ND
ND
<0.010
<0.010

-------
Table V-236 (Continued)
ZIRCONIUM-HAFNIUM SURFACE TREATMENT SPENT BATHS
	 	 RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA 	 	
Pol lutant
Toxic Pollutants (Continued)
68. di-n-butyl phthalate
70. diethyl phthalate
78. anthracene (a)
81. phenanthrene (a)
VQ 85. tetrachl oroethy l.ene
U1
86. tol.uene
87. trichloroethylene
Stream
Code
P-2
P-3
P-2
P-3
P-2
P-3
P-2
P-3
P-2
P-3
P-2
P-3
P-2
P-3
Sample Concentrations (mg/1)
Type Source Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
1 <0.010
1 <0.010
1 <0.010
1 <0.010
1 <0.010
1 ND
1 <0.010
1 ND
1 ND ND
1 ND <0.010
1 ND <0.010
1 ND 0.015
1 ND <0.010
1 ND <0.010

-------
                                          Table V-236  (Continued)

                               ZIRCONIUM-HAFNIUM SURFACE TREATMENT  SPENT  BATHS
                                         RAW  WASTEWATER SAMPLING  DATA
Ul
C»
           Pollutant


Toxic Pollutants (Continued)

114.  antimony


115.  arsenic


117.  beryl 1ium


118.  cadmium


119.  chromium (total)


120.  copper


121.  cyanide (total)


122.  lead
Stream
Code
P-2
P-3
P-2
P-3
P-2
P-3
P-2
P-3
P-2
P-3
P-2
P-3
P-2
P-3
P-2
P-3
Sample Concentrations (mg/1)
Type Source
1 ND
1 ND
1 ND
1 ND
1 ND
1 ND
1 0.010
1 0.010
1 ND
1 ND
1 0.008
1 0.008
1
1
1 ND
1 ND
Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
5
6
3
0.6
<0.2
<0.2
0.09
<0.07
24
12
1 .2
0.1
0.118
0.356
1 .4
0.53

-------
ZIRCONIUM-HAFNIUM SURFACE TREATMENT SPENT BATHS
.•---• . .. - . - RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA ' 	 -..-.. 	
Stream
Pol 1 utant Code
Toxic Pol 1 utants (Continued)
123. mercury P-2
P-3
124. nickel P-2
P-3
125. selenium P-2
P-3
126. silver P-2
VD P-3
CD
VQ 127. thallium P-2
P-3
128. zinc P-2
P-3
Sample Concentrations (mg/1)
Type Source

1
1
1 ND
1 ND
1 0.013
1 0.013
1 ND
1 ND
1 ND
1 ND
1 ND
1 ND
Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
0.0056
<0.0022
3.6
0.64
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
0.57 '
<0.5
7.5
0.17

-------
ID
a\
o
                                            Table V-236  (Continued)


                               ZIRCONIUM-HAFNIUM SURFACE TREATMENT SPENT BATHS

                                         RAW WASTEWATER  SAMPLING DATA
           Pollutant



Nonconventional  Pollutants



Alkalinity



Ammonia Nitrogen



Ca1c i urn



Fluoride



Magnesium



Phenolics



Sulfate
Stream Sample
Code Type
P-2 1
P-3 1
P-2 1
P-3 1
P-2 1
P-3 1
P-2 ,1
P-3 1
P-2 1
P-3 1
P-2 1
P-3 1
P-2 1
P-3 ! 1
Concentrations (mg/1)
Source Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
0.0
8,910
<0.1 6.81
<0.1 104
208
5.60
<0.10 17,100
<0.10 6,500
1 1 .7
2.90
0.026
0.053
1 ,080
142

-------
vo
                                           "" TagVe~ V-236  (Continued) ".

                               .ZIRCONIUM-HAFNIUM SURFACE TREATMENT  SPENT BATHS
                                          RAW WASTEWATER  SAMPLING  DATA
                   Pollutant
                                               Stream
                                                Code
Nonconventional Pollutants  (Continued)


Total Dissolved Solids  (TDS)


Conventi onal Pol 1utants

Oi1  and Grease


Total Suspended Solids  (TSS)


pH (standard units)
                                                P-2
                                                P-3
                                                                Concentrations  (mg/1)
                                                                    Source
140,000
 36,400
P-2
P-3
P-2
P-3
P-2
P-3
1 1.1
1 1.1
1 <0.5
1 <0.5
1
.1
83.9
1..87
8.70
12.6
3.7
        (a)   Reported  together

        1.    Toxic  pollutants 89-113 were analyzed in this waste stream.

       -2.	The -fo-l T&wing  tdxi-c pol Itrtarrts were rrot de-texrted-in ttiis waste" stream:"  1,  3,'5,  6,
             8-10,  12,  14-22,  24-37, 39-43, 45-47, 49-56, 58-65, 67, 69,  71,  77,  79,  80,  82-84.

       ,3.    No analyses  were performed on the following toxic pollutants:   116  and 129.

-------
                        Table V-237

          ZIRCONIUM-HAFNIUM SURFACE TREATMENT RINSE
 Plant

   1
   2
   1
   2
   3
   4
   5
   3
   6
   7
   8
   8
Average 114,300
    Water Use
L/kkg     gal/ton

I/
2,
2,
5,
12,
18,
50,
79,
971,


296.7
302
057
266
738
020
110
040
740
500
NR
NR




1
2
4
12
19
233


71.
312.
493.
543.
,376
,881
,343
,000
,120
,000
NR
NR
14
2
3
5








Percent
Recycle
0.0
0,6
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
NR
NR
Wastewater Dischar
L/kkg
296.7
1,302
2,057
2,266
5,738
12,020
18,110
50,040
79,530
971,500
NR
NR
gal/to
71.14
312.2
493.3
543.5
1,376
2,881
4,343
12,000
19,070
233,000
NR
NR
         27,410
114,300
27,410
NR - Data not reported

*Discharge from operation.
                               962

-------
                            Table V-238

          ZIRCONIUM-HAFNIUM ALKALINE CLEANING
                 SPENT BATHS
                   Plant

                     1
                     2
                     2
                     3
                     4
                     2
                     5
                     1
                     1
                     6
                     3
                     6
                     5

                Average
 Wastewater Discharge*
  L/kkg     gal/ton








1
1
3
9

12.
37.
64.
232.
239.
321.
632.
955.
,244
,962
,689
,812
NR
44
16
96
0
8
1
0
2





2i98
s;9i
15^58
55.63
57,50
77.00
151/3
229.
298.
470.
884.
2,353
NR
1
3
6
8


1,600
383.
NR - ''Data not reported

*Disqhar.ge from operation.
                              963

-------
                           Table V-239

           ZIRCONIUM-HAFNIUM ALKALINE CLEANING RINSE
 Plant

   1
   2
   1
   3
   2
   2
   4
   5
   6
   5
   7
       Water Use
   L/kkg     gal/ton
    321.1
    597.0
    815.0
  5,176
  7,589
  8,955
 80,150
166,800
181,600
313,900
     NR
Average  31,390
    77.00
   143.2
   195.5
 1,241
 1,820
 2,148
19,220
40,000
43,560
75,280
    NR

 7,530
             Percent    Wastewater Discharge*
             Recycle      L/kkg     gal/ton
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
NR
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0




5
7
8
79
166
181
313

321.
597.
815.
,176
,589
,955
,410
,800
,600
,900
NR
1
0
0











1
1
2
19
40
43
75

77.
143.
195.
,241
,820
,148
,040
,000
,560
,280
NR
00
2
5








                                  31,390
7,530
NR - Data not reported

*Discharge from operation.
                              964

-------
                           Table V-240        i
                                              j

               ZIRCONIUM-HAFNIUM MOLTEN SALT RINSE
 Plant

   1
   2
      Water Use
  L/kkg     gal/ton
    20.86
15,090
Average   7,556
    5.00
3,619

1,812
Percent
Recycle

  0.0
  0.0
                       Wastewater Discharge*
                         ;L/kkg     gal/ton
    20.86
15,090

 7,556
     5.00
 3,619

,1/812
*Discharge from operation.
                              965

-------
                           Table V-241

      ZIRCONIUM-HAFNIUM SAWING OR GRINDING SPENT NEAT OILS
 Plant

   1

Average
    Water Use
L/kkg     gal/ton
  NR

  NR
NR

NR
Percent
Recycle

  0.0
                    Wastewater Discharge*
                      L/kkg     gal/ton
0.00

0.00
0.00

0.00
NR - Data not reported

*Discharge from operation.
                              966

-------
                           Table V-242

      ZIRCONIUM-HAFNIUM SAWING OR GRINDING SPENT EMULSIONS
 Plant

   1
   2
   2  s
   2  ;
   3  i
   3  !
   3  i

Average
    Water Use
L/kkg     gal/ton
  39.6 2
  NR
  NR
  NR
  NR
  NR
  NR

  39.62
 9.50
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR

 9.50
Percent
Recycle

  0.0
  NR
  0.0
   P
  NR
  NR
  NR
                    Wastewater Discharge*
                      :L/kkg     gal/ton
  0.00
 ; 0.00
 ! 0.00
281.1
 ;NR
 !NR
            281.1
 0.00
 0.00
 0.00
67.42
NR
NR
NR

67.42
 P - Periodic discharge
NR - Data not reported

*Dischjarge from operation
                              967

-------
                           Table V-243

   ZIRCONIUM-HAFNIUM SAWING OR GRINDING CONTACT COOLING WATER
 Plant

   1
   2

Average
    Water Use
L/kkg     gal/ton
 321.1
  NR

 321.1
77.00
NR

77.00
Percent
Recycle

  O.Q
  NR
                    Wastewater Discharge*
                      L/kkg     gal/ton.
321.1
 NR

321.1
77.00
NR

77.00
NR - Data not reported

*Discharge from operation.
                              968

-------
                          Table V-244

           ZIRCONIUM-HAFNIUM SAWING OR GRINDIN
-------
                           Table V-245
       ZIRCONIUM-HAFNIUM INSPECTION AND TESTING WASTEWATER
Plant
1
2
3
3
Water Use
L/kkg gal/ton
15.43
56,270
NR
NR
3.70
13,490
NR
NR
Percent
Recycle
0.0
0.0
NR
NR
Wastewater Discharge*
L/kkg gal/ton
15.43
56,270
NR
NR
3.
13,490
NR
NR
70



Average  28,140
6,749
28,140
6,749
NR - Data not reported
*Discharge from operation.
                              970

-------
                      Table V-246




ZIRCONIUM-HAFNIUM INSPECTION AND TESTING WASTEWATER,


Pol lutant
Toxi c Pol 1 utants
117. beryl Hum

118. cadmi urn

119. chromium (total)

^ 1 20. copper
^J
H
121 . cyanide
122. lead

124. nickel

128. zinc

RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
Stream Sample
Code Type

BV-8
AX-4 1
BV-8
AX-4 1
BV-8
AX-4 1
BV-8
AX-4 1

AX-4 1
BV-8
AX-4 1
BV-8
AX-4 1
BV-8
AX-4 1

Concentrations (mg/1)
Source Day 1 Day 2 pay 3

<0.001
<0.100
<0.005
<0.500
0.003
<0.050
0.. 018
0.050

<0.500
<0.050
<0.100
- <0.012
<0.100 .
0.160
1.000

-------
            Table V-246 (Continued)

ZIRCONIUM-HAFNIUM INSPECTION AND TESTING WASTEWATER
              RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA






VD
-4
tO

Pol lutant
Nonconvent i onal Pol lutants
Al umi num
Ammonia (as N)
Cobalt
F 1 uoride
Haf ni um
I-ron
Mo 1 ybdenum
Ti tani um
Stream
Code

BV-8
AX-4
BV-8
. AX-4
BV-8
BV-8
AX-8
BV-8
BV-8
AX-4
Samole Concentrations (mg/1)
Type Source Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
0.030
1 - <0.05
<0.004
1 - 1.150
ND
0 . 040
1 - <0.100
0.077
<0.010
1 - <0.500

-------
Table V-246 (Continued)
ZIRCONIUM-HAFNIUM INSPECTION AND TESTING WASTEWATER
RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
Stream Sample
Pollutant . Code Tvpe
Nonconventiona'l Pollutants (ContinuedY
Vanadium BV-8
AX-4 i
Zirconium BV-8
AX-4 1
Convent i ona 1 Pol lutants
Oi 1 and Grease BV-8
AX-4 1
Total Suspended Solids (TSS) AX-4 i
\O
-J PH AX-4 1
i .1
Concentrations (mg/1)
Source Day 1 Dav 9 n=,,, 3
<0.002
<1.00
<0.020
- <2.5


<2.00
4.000

- 7.3

-------
                           Table V-247

           ZIRCONIUM-HAFNIUM DECREASING SPENT SOLVENTS
Plant
1
2
3
Water
L/kkg
NR
85.57
NR
Use
gal/ton
NR
20.52
NR
Percent
Recycle
100.0
P
P
Wastewater
L/kkg
0.00
85.57
NR
Discharge*
gal/ton
0.00
20.52
NR
Average
85.57
                        20.52
                                 85.57
                                                         20.52
 P - Periodic discharge
NR - Data not reported

*Discharge from operation,
                                974

-------
                            Table V-248

                 ZIRCONIUM-HAFNIUM  DECREASING RINSE
 Plant
Average
 ;    Water Use
 L/kkg     gal/ton
4,054

4,054
972.3

972.3
Percent
Recycle

  0.0
                    I Wastewater Discharge*
                    j   L/kkg     gal/ton
;4,054

:4,054
972.3

972.3
*Discharge from operation.
                             975

-------
                           Table V-249

      ZIRCONIUM-HAFNIUM WET AIR POLLUTION CONTROL SLOWDOWN
 Plant

   1
   2
   3
   4
   3
   5
   5
   5
      Water Use
  L/kkg     gal/ton
 2,650
    NR
   558.9
10,200
    NR
    NR
    NR
    NR
Average   4,470
  636,0
   NR
  134.0
2,446
   NR
   NR
   NR
   NR

1,072
Percent
Recycle

 100.0
   P
 83.3
 94.7
 80.0
  0.0
  0.0
  0.0
                       Wastewater Discharge*
                         L/kkg     gal/ton
  0.00
  8.17
 93.16
536.9
 NR
 NR
 NR
 NR

212.7
  0.00
  1.96
 22.34
128.8
 NR
 NR
 NR
 NR

 51.03
 P - Periodic discharge
NR - Data not reported

*Discharge from operation.
                                976

-------
              ;             Table V-250        ;
                                              i -
              METAL POWDERS METAL POWDER PRODUCTION
              ;       ATOMIZATION WASTEWATER   ;
Plant I
I [
2

3
4 \
5
6 ;
Water
1/kkg
125
1,450
2,24,0
2,740
6,670
17,000
NR
Use
gal/ton
30.0
348
538
656
1,600
4,080
NR
Percent
Recycle
0
0
0
0
0
0
NR
Waistewater
i/kkg
125
1,450
2,240 '
2,740
6,670
!
17,000
i , NR ;
Discharge
gal/ton
30.0
348
538
656
1,600
4,080
NR
NR - Dkta not reported
                               977

-------
                         Table V-251

METAL POWDERS METAL POWDER PRODUCTION ATOMIZATION WASTEWATER
                RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
Pol lutant
Toxi c Pol lutants
115. arsenic
118. cadmium
119. chromium (total)
120. copper
121. cyanide (total)
122. lead
VQ
»J
00
123. mercury
124. nickel
128. zinc
Nonconvent i onal Pollutants
Acidity
A 1 umi num
Cobalt
Fl uoride
Iron
Conventional Pollutants
Oi 1 and Grease
S-1
S-1
S-1
T-l
S-1
T-l
S-1
T-1
S-1
T-1
S-1
S-1
T-l
S-1

T-1
S-1
T-1
S-1
T-1
S-1
T-l
S-1
T-1
S-1
T-1
Stream
Code
2
2
2
6
2
6
1
1
2
6
2
2
6
2

6
2
6
2
6
2
6
2
6
1
1
Sample
<0.01
<0.05
<0.005
<0.01
<0.05
0.048
<0.01
<0.01
<0.'l
<0.005
<0.0002
<0.200
0.075
<0.05

**
<0.2
0. 14
<0. 1
<0.01
<0. 1
1 .01
0.122 1
0.27
<1
<0. 1 ;0.4
Concentrations (nia/l)
Source Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
<0.01
<0- 05
1 .95
8.3 0.022 0.026
1 .090
45.000 5.400 0.0044
0.026
<0.01 <0.01
0.523
<0.005 <0.005 0.0054
<0.0002
9.200
81.0 1.600 1.100
0.607

** ** **
0.407
0.630 0.110 0.041
<0.1
11.000 0.250 0.240
0. 14
' 0.89 0.95
,210
40.000 0.46 0.280
3.1
0. 1 ; 1 . 1 0.1;6.1 0.3;5.1

-------
                                     Table V-251  (Continued)

                  METAL POWDERS METAL POWDER PRpDUCTION_AJOMI,ZATION . WAS.IEWATER
                  '"'  	    """ "RAW"WASTEWATER  SAMPLING"DATA
              Pol 1utant

   Convent i onal  Po11utants) (Continued)

   Total Suspended Solids (TSS)


   pH (standard units)
Stream
 Code
Sample
 Type     Source
                                                                  Concentrations  (mg/1)
S-1
T-1
S-1
T-1
2
6
1 .
6
<0. 1
1 .0

7.7
2, 127

8

                                                                8.1-8.2
                                10.0
                                                                            7.7
                                           12.0


                                            7.76
-J
VO
   **Less than detection limit.  Detection limit not known.

   1. "No analyses were performed on the following toxic pollutants:   1-114,  116,  125,  126,
       127,  and 129.

   2.  Note that stream code T-1 also appears on ;the nickel-cobalt metal powder  production
       wet atomization wastewater raw wastewater sampling data table.  The  wastewater  is
       derived from an operation in both subcategories.

-------
            Table V-252

METAL POWDERS TUMBLING, BURNISHING
      OR CLEANING WASTEWATER

Plant
1

2
3


4
5
6
7
8

9
10
11
12
13
14

15
16
Water
1/kkg
NR
NR
27.8
59.2
173
446
83.4
125
174
4,380
NR
If660
653
1,660
834
1,010
1,040
1,240
11,400
1,540
3,270
Use
gal/ton
NR
NR
6.67
14.2
41.6
107
20,0
30.0
41.7
1,050
NR
398
158
397
200
243
250
297
2,730
370
783
Percent
Recycle
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 ( + )
90.9
P
0
0
0 ( + )
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Wastewater
1/kkg
0
NR
27.8
59.2
173
446
83.4
125
156
397
397
1,660
659
663
834
1,010
1,040
1,240
11,400
1,540
3,270
Discharge
gal/ton
0
NR
6.67
14.2
41.6
107
20.0
30.0
37.5
95.2
95.2
399
158
159
200
243
250
297
2,730
370
783
                 980

-------
I

1 ••
i
\
Plant
17 ; '4,
18 ! 6,
; : 6,
; is,
19 ; 7,
20 ' 16,
21 22,
22

i
23 ; ;
24 I
25 ;
26 1
,
; :
27 |

28 !
29 :
I
i
NR -j Data
+ -; Loss






Table V-
METAL POWDERS

-252 (Continued;
i



TUMBLING, BURNISHING
OR CLEANING WASTEWATER j
i
i
Water Use
1/kkg gal/ton
300
380
960
600
760
300
800
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR

NR
NR

not
due


1,030
1,530
1,670
3,750
1,860
3,920
5,460
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR

NR
NR

reported
to drag-out


Percent
Recycle
0 ( + )
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
NR
0
0
0
NR
NR
NR
NR

NR
NR

981

i
Wastewater
1/kkg '
3,840
6,380
6,960
15,600
7,760
16,300
i . .
22,800
NR
NR
; NR
I
] NR
i NR.
i
! NR
NR
i !
\ NR
; NR
t
NR
i • •
t
; NR
j ,,i , ,„ , , , 1 ,
-j ' ' .
j
I .
i
i •
Discharge
gal/ton
922
1,530
1,670
3,750
1,860
3,920
5,460
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR

NR
NR




-------
                                                 Table V-253

                         METAL POWDERS TUMBLING,  BURNISHING, OR CLEANING WASTEWATER
                                        RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
VD
09
tsJ
           Pollutant

Toxic Pollutants

  4.  benzene



  6.  carbon tetrachloride



 1i;  1,1,1-trichloroethane



 23.  chloroform



 44.  methylene chloride



 48.  dichlorobromomethane



 86.  toluene



114.  ant imony



115.  arseni c



117.  bery1 1i urn



118.  cadmium
                                              Stream
                                               Code
J-2
J-3
J-4

J-2
J-3
J-4

J-2
J-3
J-4

J-2
J-3
J-4

J-2
J-3
J-4

J-2
J-3
J-4

J-2
J-3
J-4

J-2
J-3
J-4

J-2
J-3
J-4

J-2
J-3
J-4

J-2
J-3
J-4
                                                               Concentrations Cmg/1)
Source
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.027
0.027
0.027
ND
ND
ND
0.004
0.004
0.004
ND
ND
ND
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010

-------
                                            Table V-253  (Continued)
                        ~METAL POWDER'S  TUMBONG'," BURNTSHTNG ,~~OR CLEANING" WASTEWATER'
                                         RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
VD
03
W

Pol 1 utant
Toxic Pol 1 utants (Continued)
119. chromium (total)


120. copper


121. cyanide (total)


122. lead


1 23 . mercury


124. nickel


1~25..~ se 1 erTTum 	 ~~ - •— - -.-• 	
126.- silver


127. thai 1 ium


128. zinc


Stream
Code

J-2
J-3
J-4
J-2
J-3
J-4
J-2
J-3
J-4
J-2
J-3
J-4
J-2
J-3
J-3
J-2
J-3
J-4
1 r-l
	 j -z
J-3
J-4
J-2
J-3
. J-4
J-2
J-3
J-4
J-2
J-3
J-4
Sampl e
Type

1
2
6
1
2
6
1
1
1
1
2
6
1
2
6
1
2
6
1
	 	 r
2
6
1
2
6
1
2
6
1
2
6
                                                                        Concentrations (mg/1)
Source
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0

<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
0
<0
<0
.020
.020
.020
.050
.050
.050
.02
.02
.02
.050
.050
.050
.0002
.0002
.0002
.050
.050
.050

.010
.010
.010
.010
.010
.010
.010
.010
.080
.050
.080
Day 1
<0
0
0
<0
253
34
0
0
1
<0
45
5
<0
<0
<0
<0
0
0

<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
0
1
0
.020
.080
. 1 60
.050

.0
. 1 1
.04
.8
.050
. 1
.20
.0002 '
.0002
.0002
.050
.500
.600
r\ * r\
.-Lrl LT
.0.10
.010
.010
.010
.010 ._
.,010
.010 '
.010
. 100
. 18
.600
Day 2
<0
0
0
<0
16
21
<0
0
1
<0
2
3
<0
<0
<0
<0
3
0
.020
.200
. 180
.050
.5
.2
.02
.39
.6
.050
.00
.15
.0002
.0002
.0002
.050
.00
.550
Day 3
<0
0
0
<0
5
10
<0
• 0
0
<0
1
7
<0
<0
<0
<0
2
0
.020
.060
.060
.050
.50
.5
.02
. 15
.10
.050
.00
.50
.0002
.0002
.0002
.050
.65
.400
^nriiri^-r\AiA

-------
                                          Table V-253 (Continued)

                        METAL POWDERS TUMBLING, BURNISHING,  OR CLEANING WASTEWATER
                                       RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
vo
09
           Pollutant


Nonconvent1onal  Pollutants

Acidity



Alkalinity



Aluminum



Ammonia Nitrogen



Barium



Boron



Calcium



Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD)



Chloride



Cobalt



F1uoride
                                             Stream
                                              Code
J-2
J-3
J-4

J-2
J-3^
J-4

J-2
J-3
J-4

J-2
J-3
J-4

J-2
J-3
J-4

J-2
J-3
J-4

J-2
J-3
J-4

J-2
J-3
J-4

J-2
J-3
J-4

J-2
J-3
J-4

J-2
J-3
J-4
1
2
6

1
2
6

1
2
6

1
2
6

1
2
6

1
2
6

1
2
6

1
2
6

1
2
6

1
2
6

1
2
6
                   	Concentrations (mg/1)
                   Source    Day 1     Day 2
13
13
13
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
<0
<0
<0
10
10
10
70
70
70
<1

-------
Table V-253 (Continued)
METAL POWDERS TUMBLING, BURNISHING, OR CLEANING WASTEWATER
. . .- . . . . . RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA .. 	
Stream Sample Concentrations (mg/1)
Pol 1 utant Code
Nonconvent i onal Pollutants (Continued)
Iron J-2
J-3
J-4
Magnesium J-2
J-3
J-4
Manganese J-2
J-3
J-4
VD Molybdenum J-2
C» J-3
en . j-4
Phenol ics J-2
J-3
J-4
- Phosphate J-"2
J-3
J-4
Sodium J-2
; : J-3
J-4
Sulfate J-2
	 ...:...:.. 	 , ..- . .. . -J-3
J-4
Tin ' J-2"
J-3
• J-4
Titanium J-2
• - J-3
J-4
: Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) J-2
J-3
: J-4
Type

1
2
6
1
2
6
1
2
6
1
2
6
1
1
1
1
2
6
1
2
6
1
	 2
6
1
2
. 6
1
. 2
6
1
2
6
Source

0
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
1 1 1
1 1 1
1 1 1
90
90
90
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
76
76
76

. 100
. 100
.100
.40
.40
.40
201'
.200
.200
.050
.050
.050
.005
.005
.005
.5
.5 1
.5




2
2
.050
.050
.050
.050
.050
.050
1
1
2
Day 1

0.
49.
94.
1 .
3.
9.
<0.
0.
1 .
<0.
<0.
0.
3.
2.
0.
<1
,200
130
2.
288
278
600
,400
,400
<0.
15.
3.
<0.
1 .
1 .
,500
,740
,500

100
2
2
40
20
30
050
450
00
050
050
400
6
1
96



30
1

1
, 1
4
050
8
40
050
90
20
3
1
2
Day 2

0.
21 1
1 15
1 .
4.
8.
<0.
0.
0.
<0.
0.
0.
• 33
0.
0.
<1
<1
80
10.
,820
390
,500
,500
,500
<0.
4.
1 .
<0.
2.
1 .
,050
,800
,000

300


30
00
30
050
500
650
050
100
500

33
56



7
1

1
1-1-
1
050
50
75
050
50
40

8
2
Day 3

0
50
68
1
1
5
ll
0
0

-------
                                          Table V-253 (Continued)

                        METAL POWDERS TUMBLING, BURNISHING, OR CLEANING WASTEWATER
                                       RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
00
           Pollutant


Nonconventional  Pollutants (Continued)


Total Organic Carbon (TOC)



Total Solids  (TS)

Vanadi um



Yttrium




Conventional  Pollutants

Oil and Grease



Total Suspended Solids (TSS)



pH (standard  units)
Stream
Code
J-2
J-3
J-4
J-2
J-2
J-3
J-4
J-2
J-3
J-4
J-2
J-3
J-4
J-2
J-3
J-4
J-2
J-3
J-4
Sample
Type
1
2
6
1
1
2
6
1
2
6
1
1
1
1
2
6
1
2
6
Concentrations (mg/1)
Source
3
3
3 2
123 1
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<}
<1
<1
42
42 1
42
2.71
2.71
2.71
Da
50
300
,600
,600
<0.
0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
850
88

99
,300
260
6.
9.
9.
y 1 Da_
600
820
3,600
3,940
050 <0.
100 <0.
050 0.
050 <0.
050 <0.
050 <0.
2, 100
22
27
144
874
1 ,370
50 7.
41 8.
60 9.
y 2 Da
98
1 ,850
3,620
410
050 <0.
500 <0.
050 <0.
050 <0.
500 <0 .
050 <0.
520
4
6
390
3,000
900
60 6.
93 9.
21 9.
y 3




050
050
050
050
050
050






20
10
10
      1.  The following toxic pollutants were not detected  in this waste  stream:   1-3,  5,  7-10,
          12-22, 24-43, 45-47, 49-85, 87, and 88.

      2.  No analyses were performed on the following toxic pollutants:   89-113,  116,  a'nd  129.

-------
                            Table V-254
                 METAL POWDERS  SAWING OR GRINDING
                          SPENT NEAT OILS
 Plant

   1!
          Water  Use
      1/kkg      gal/ton
       NR
NR
Percent
Recycle

  NR
Wastewater Discharge
 1/kkg      gal/ton

 6.17 (CH)  1.48 (CH)
NR -
CH -
Data not reported
Contract haul
                               987

-------
                           Table V-255

                METAL POWDERS SAWING OR GRINDING
                         SPENT EMULSIONS
Water Use
Plant 1/kkg gal/ton
1 4,590
2 NR
3 NR
NR
4 NR
59,200
5 550
1,100
NR
NR
NR
NR
14,200
132
Percent
Recycle
0 ( + )
P>
P
P
P
P
0 ( + )
Wastewater
1/kkg
0
4
6
26
11
41
221

.63
.13
.7
.8
.1

Discharg
gal/ton
0
1.11
1.47
6.40
2.83
9.85
52.9
NR - Data not reported
 + - Loss due to drag-out
 P - Periodic discharge
                               988

-------
                    Table  V-256

 METAL POWDERS SAWING  OR GRINDING SPENT EMULSIONS
-•"•  	  RAW WA-STEWATER"SAMPLING~DATA"~ "  	
Toxi c
6.
1 1 .
23.
48.
86.
S "<•
vo
115.
1 17.
. 118.
1 19.
1.20..
12 1 .
122.
123.
124.
Pol lutant
Pol lutants
carbon tetrachl oride
1 , 1 , 1-trichl oro ethane
chloroform ;
di ch 1 o rob romo me thane
toluene
antimony
arseni c "
bery 1 H urn
cadmi um
chromium (total ) - •
copper
cyani de (total ) '
•1 ead ;
mercury
nickel
Stream
Code
J-5
J-6
J-5
J-6
J-5
J-6
J-5
J-6
J-5
J-6
J-5
J-6 .
J-5
J-6
J-5
J-6
J-5
J-6
J-5
J-6
J-5
J-6
J-5
J-6
J-5
J-6
J-5
J-6
J-5
J-6
Samp) e
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
: r,
i
i
1
1
1
Concentrations (mg/1)
Source
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.027
0.027
0.004
0.004
ND
ND
<0.010
= <0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.005
<0.005
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.050
<0.;050
<0.02
<0.02
<0.050
<0.050
<0.0002
<0.0002
<0.050
<0.050
Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
0.015
ND
0.055
0.019
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.007
0.002
<0.010
<0.01Q
<0. 010
<0.200
<0.005
<0.050
<0.020
<0.200
,0.080 : i - -, . -
<0. 200 .
, 1 .55
<0 . 500 , . . : : . '
2.5 . -
<0.02 • . ' . ' . • .
0.200 - '
<0.500
<0.002
<0.002
0. 150 •'.•..
<0.500 • '

-------
                                         Table  V-256  (Continued)

                            METAL  POWDERS  SAWING  OR GRINDING SPENT EMULSIONS
                                       RAW  WASTEWATER  SAMPLING DATA
V£>
VO
O
           Pol 1utant

Toxic Pollutants  (Continued)

125.  selenium


126.  silver


127.  thai 1ium


128.  z.inc



Nonconventional Pollutants

Acidity


Alkalini ty


.Al umi num


Ammonia  Nitrogen


Barium


Boron


Calcium


Chemical Oxygen Demand  (COD)


Chloride
Stream
Code
J-5
J-6
J-5
J-6
J-5
J-6
J-5
J-6
J-5
J-6
J-5
J-6
J-5
J-6
J-5
J-6
J-5
J-6
J-5
J-6
J-5
J-6
J-5
J-6
J-5
J-6
Sample
Concentrations (mg/1)
Type Source
1 <0.010
1 <0.010
1 <0.
1 <0.
1 <0.
1 <0.
1 0.
1 0.
1 <1
1 <1
1 13
1 13
1 0.
1 0.
1 0.
1 0.
1 0.
1 0.
1 <0.
1 <0.
1 10.
1 10.
1 70
1 70
1 <1
1 <1
010
010
010
010
080
080

1
300
300
16
16
050
050
100
100
4
4
7
24

Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
<0.010
<0. 100
<0
<0
<0
0
3
1
<1
4
,920
<1
1
7
0
5
0
0
.0
166
15
22
,000
,000
<1
91
.010
.010
.010
.010
.26
.56
.30

.60
.00
. 16
.5
.050
.500
.400
.7
.0



-------
             Table V-256 (Continued)



METAL POWDERS SAWING OR GRINDING SPENT EMULSIONS
	 	 	 .-_ 	 	 	 RAW- WASTEWATER "SAMPLING
- - • - -
Pol lutant
Nonconvent i onal Pollutants (Continued)
Cobalt

F 1 uoride

Iron

Magnesi um

Manganese
U3
£2 Molybdenum

Phenol ics

Phosphate

Sodi um

Sulfate - ; ' -

} Tin ";' '
r
Ti tani um ' '

Total Dissolved Solids (TDS)

Total Organic Carbon (TOC)


Total Solids (TS)

Stream - Sample
Code Type

J-5 1
J-6 1
J-5 1
J-6 1
J-5 1
J-6 1
J-5 1
J-6 1
J-5 1
J-6 1
J-5 1
J-6 1
J-5 1
J-6 1
J-5 1
J-6 1
J-5 1
J-6 1
• J-5 - - 1
J-6 1
J-5 1
• J-6 1
; J-5 1.
J-6 1
J-5 , 1
J-6 • ' 1
, J-5 . 1
; j-e 1
!
- J-5 1
;j-e 1
DATA



Concentrations (mg/1)
Source

<0
<0
1
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
• 1 1 1
11 1
90
90
<0
.. 
-------
                                           Table  V-256  (Continued)

                             METAL  POWDERS SAWING  OR GRINDING  SPENT  EMULSIONS
                                        RAW WASTEWATER  SAMPLING DATA
VO
VO
NJ
           Pollutant

Nonconventional  Pollutants (Continued)

Vanadium


Yttrium



Conventional Pollutants

Oi1  and Grease


Total Suspended  Solids (TSS)


pH (standard units)
Stream
Code
J-5
J-6
J-5
J-6
J-5
J-6
J-5
J-6
J-5
J-6
Sample Concentrations (mg/1)
Type Source
1 <0.050
1 <0.050
1 <0.050
1 <0.050
1 <1
1 <1
1 42
1 42
1 ?./1
1 2.71
Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
<(K050
<0.500

-------
                           Table V-257
                METAL POWDERS SAWING OR GRINDING
                      CONTACT COOLING WATER  '
Plant

  1  i

  2  I
        . Water Use
     1/kkg     gal/ton
   162,000

        NR

        NR

        NR
38,900

    NR

    NR

    NR
Percent
Recycle

    0

   NR

   NR

   NR
                       yjtestewater Discharge
                        11/kkg      gal/ton
1^2,000
 ! _
 j
 •    NR


 ;    NR


 !    NR
38,900

    NR

    NR

    NR
NR -
Data not reported
                               993

-------
                                         Table V-258

                   METAL POWDERS SAWING OR GRINDING CONTACT COOLING WATER
                                RAW WASTEWATER SAMPLING DATA
Pol lutant
Toxic Pol 1 utants
117. beryl 1 ium
118. cadmium
119. chromium (total)
120. copper
122. lead
124. nickel
VD 128. zinc
VD
•Ps.
Nonconvent ional Pollutants
Al umi num
Iron
Magnesium
Manganese
Tin
Stream
Code
AH-3
AH-3
AH-3
AH-3
AH-3
AH-3
AH-3
AH-3
AH-3
AH-3
AH-3
AH-3
Sample Concentrations (mg/1)
Type Source Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
0.028
<0.050
<0.030
230.000
<0.500
0.310
0.910
40.00
0.800
1 1 .00
0.320
0.360
1 .
No analyses were performed for the following toxic pollutants:  1-116,  121,  123,  125,  127  and  129.

-------
                            Table V-259
                                             !
                                             |

               METAL POWDERS SIZING SPENT NEAT  OILS
 Plant

   1  I
     j
   2
    Water Use
1/kkg     gal/ton
 NR

 NR
NR

NR
Percent
Recycle

  100

  100
                     Wastewater Discharge
                      il/kkg      gal/ton
jO  ( + )
 o  (+
0 ( + )

0 ( + )
NR -.Data not reported
 + - Loss due to evaporation and drag-out
                              995

-------
                           Table V-260

              METAL POWDERS SIZING SPENT EMULSIONS
Plant

  1
    Water Use
1/kkg     gal/ton
 14.6
3.50
Percent
Recycle

  100
                      Wastewater Discharge
                       1/kkg      gal/ton
0
0 ( + )
 4- - Loss due to evaporation and drag-out
                               996

-------
                            Table V-261      '

               METAL POWDERS STEAM TREATMENT!WET
                 AIR POLLUTION CONTROL SLOWDOWN
Plant

  1  '
    Water Use
1/k'kg     gal/ton
 792
                      190
Percent
 Recycle

    0
W4stewater Discharge
  jl/kkg      gal/ton
                                    792
                                                          190
                              997

-------
METAL POWDERS
             Table V-262

STEAM TREATMENT WET AIR POLLUTION CONTROL SLOWDOWN
    RAW WASTEV/ATER SAMPLING DATA

Toxic

4.
6.

1 1 .

23.
44.
48.

86.
*° 114.
VD
00
115.
1 17.

1 18.
1 19.

120.
121 .
122.

123.
124.

125.
126.

127.

128.
Pol lutant
Pol lutants

benzene
carbon tetrachl oride

1,1,1-trichl o roe thane

chl orotorm
•methylene .chloride
di chl orobromomethane

toluene
ant imony

arsenic
beryl 1 i um

cadmium
chromium (total)

copper
cyanide (total
lead

mercury
ni ckel

se 1 eni um
si 1 ver

thai 1 i um

zinc
Stream
Code

J_ i
i
J-1

J-1

J-1
J-1
J-1
	 i
1
J-1
J— 1

J-1
	 1
1
J-1
1— 1
O 1
J-1
J-1
1- 1
vj 1
J-1

J-1
J-1
1 _ 1
J 1
J_ 1
1
Sample Concentrations (mg/1)
Type Source

1 ND

1 ND
1 Nn
I MU
1 0 . 027

1 ND
1 0.004
1 MD

6 <0.010
6 <0.010

6 <0.005
6 <0.020

6 <0.020
6 <0.050

1 <0.02
6 <0.050
6 <0.0002

6 <0.050
6 <0 . 01 0

6 <0.010
6 <0 .010

6 0.080

Day 1

0.004

ND
0.007

ND

O.OOB
ND
0.002

<0.010
<0.010

<0.005
<0.020

<0.020
<0.050

0. 13
<0.050
<0.0002

<0.050
<0.010

<0.010
<0.010

0.040

Day 2

ND

0.005
0.005

ND

0.005
ND
0.004

<0.010
<0.010

<0.005
<0.020

<0.020
<0.050

<0.02
<0.050
<0.0002

<0.050
<0.010

<0.010
<0.010

0.030

Day 3

0.003

0.006
0.006

ND

ND
ND
II ln)2

<0.010
-.U.UlO

<0.005
<0.020

<0.020
<0.050

0.03
<0.050
<0.0002

<0.050
<0.010

<0.010
<0.010

0.020


-------
                     Table V-262  (Continued)
METAL POWDERS
              STEAM TREATMENT WET AIR POLLUTION  CONTROL  SLOWDOWN
                  RAW WAST.EWATER SAMPLING DATA
Pol lutant
Nonconventional Pollutants
Acidity
Al kal ini ty
Aluminum

Ammonia Nitrogen
Barium

Boron

Cat ci um

Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD)
\O Ch 1 or i de
VO
^0 Cobalt

Fl uoride
Iron

Magnesium

Manganese

Mo 1 ybdenum
i •
Phenol ics

Phosphate

Sodium

Sulfate

Tin

Ti tanium

Total Dissolved Solids (TDS)
c...ream sample . Concentrations (mg/1)
Code Type Source
J-1 6 <1
J-1 6 13

J"1 6 0.300
J-1 6 0.16

J"1 i 6 0.050

J"' , 6 <0.100

J-1 6 10.4
J-1 6 70

J-l 6 <1

J"1 6 <0.050
J-l 6 "- 1.2

J-1 6 0.100

J-1 6 1.4Q
J— 1 f*
1 6 0.200
1-1
	 ~ " ~™~ ~' 	 ~ "~ 6"H' - '; ,<0'."0"5O
"'• "
J"1 , . •; '- 1 L1 ; 0.005
! ,
J-] . 6 _: ..0.5

J-l ,„.. '. 	 '. 6 .:__ ,1.1 1

J-1 ' "6 -90 i ,

J-1 6 <0.050

J"1 6 " " <0.050
J-1 : ^6 76
Day 1
< 1
10

0. 200
0.64

0.050

<0. 100

10.7
380

110

<0.050
1 .0

0. 100

1 .50

<0.050

" 
-------
                                           Table  V-262  (Continued)

                      METAL  POWDERS  STEAM TREATMENT  WET AIR  POLLUTION  CONTROL  SLOWDOWN
                                        RAW WASTEWATER  SAMPLING DATA
H
O
O
O
           Pollutant



Nonconventional  Pollutants (Continued)



Total Organic Carbon (TOC)

Total Solids (TS)

Vanadium

Yttri um


Conventional Pollutants

Oi1  and Grease

Total Suspended  Solids  (TSS)

pH (standard units)
Stream
Code _
J-1
J-1
J-1 .
J-1
J-1
J-1
J-1
Sample
6
6
6
6
1
6
6
Cnnrentrations (mg/ 1 )
Source
3
125
<0.050
<0.050
<1
42
2.71
Day 1_
15
180
<0.050
<0.050
35
15
5.81
Day 2
27
134
<0.050
<0.050
42
80
6.21

Day 3
16
350
<0.050
<0.050
31
200
6.00
        1.   The following  toxic  pollutants  were not  detected in this waste stream:   1-3;  5,  7-10,

            12-22,  24-43,  45-47,  49-85,  87,  and 88.

        2.   No analyses were performed on the following toxic pollutants:   89-113,  116,  and  129.

-------


Plant
1
2
3
.4
5
6
7






NR - Da
+ - Lo
CH - Co






i
Table V-263
i '
METAL POWDERS OIL-RESIN IMPREGNATION
SPENT NEAT OILS |
i
Water Use Percent Wa'stewater Discharge
1/kkg gal/ton Recycle lAkg gal/ton
NR NR 100
NR NR 100
NR NR NR
36.8 8.83 0
NR NR NR
NR NR NR
NR NR NR

'
•



d (+) o (+)
I - . -
d c+j o < + )
10.9 (CH) 2.61 (CH)
36;. 8 (CH) 8.83 (CH)
NR (CH) NR (CH)
NR NR
! •" - '
NR; ; NR
j " ' ' : ", - -
1 :
i
i
! '- '.
i
j - T
• ! ' .'•' 	 ' • 	
, '_-!*, ' - -

v l " ' 7
ta not reported
ss due to evaporation and drag-out :
ntract hauled j ...





; 1001
j -
I'* ' ' '
J T -, . -= - - . ' -


.1 ...
i
j ^ ^ - i
j ,:.;_,
i 	 •<"
j ^

-------
                            Table V-264

                   METAL POWDERS HOT PRESSING
                      CONTACT COOLING WATER
Plant

  1
    Water Use
1/kkg     gal/ton
8,800
2,110
           Percent
           Recycle

              0
                                            Wastewater Discharge
                                             1/kkg      gal/ton
                                   8,800
2,110
                                 1002

-------
                                           Table  V-265
METAL POWDERS
RAW
Pol lutant
toxic Pollutants
117. beryl 1 ium
118. cadmi um
119. chromium (total)
120. copper
122. lead
H 124. nickel
O
O .128. zinc
Nonconventional Pollutants
Aluminum
, Cobalt
Iron
Magnesium
Tin ! ", • '
i; Titanium
Vanadium
HOT PRESSING CONTACT
WASTEWATER SAMPLING
Stream Sample
-, , . '.,
AH-2 .
AH-2
AH-2
AH-2
AH-2
AH-2
AH-2

AH-2
AH-2
AH-2
AH-2
AH-2
'AH- 2
• AH-2 :
COOLING WATER
DATA
Concentrations (mg/ 1 )
Source Day 1 Day 2 nay 3
0.002
<0.005
0.010
2.200
<0.050
0.043
0.079

0.490
0.008
5.300
- - -- 3 500. -- _ . - - - . - 	 - 	 - .-- 	 - ... - - - 	 	 	 --
0.046 ' • - . -
- 0.01 i
0.006 ' . :. ... ' L
1.  No  analyses  were performed  for  the  following  toxic pollutant:  1-116,  121,  123,  125-127
                                                                                         and  129.

-------
                            Table V-266

                  METAL POWDERS MIXING WET AIR
                   POLLUTION CONTROL SLOWDOWN
Plant

  1
     Water Use
 1/kkg     gal/ton
79,000
18,900
Percent
Recycle

   90
                       Wastewater Discharge
                        1/kkg      gal/ton
7,900
1,890
                               1004

-------
                                           Table V-267
                     METAL
RAW
Pollutant
Toxic Pollutants
117. beryllium
118. cadmium
119. chromium (total)
120. copper
122. lead
<.
124. nickel
M 128. zinc
O
O
tn Nonconvent ional Pollutants
Al umi num
Iron

Magnesium
Manganese
	 	 .Mpjybdenum 	 : 	

Titanium
WASTEWATER
Stream
Code

AH-1
AH-1
AH-1
AH-1
AH-1
AH-1
AH-1


AH-1

AH-1
AH-1
AH-1

....... ^^)-^-[-
AH-1
SAMPLING DATA
Sample Coru.ent rat ions (mg/1)
Type Source Day 1 Day •? pay 3
<0.001
<0.005
<0.003
1.200
<0.050
<0.012
0.031


0.058

0.570
'(
4.500
0.300

<0.020
; 
-------
WASTEWATER
                   Table V-268



           TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA - PLANT A
Pol lutant
Toxic Pollutants
114. antimony
115. arsenic
117. beryllium
118. cadmium
119. chromium (total)
120. copper
O
O 122. lead
OT
124. nickel
128. zinc
Nonconventional Pollutants
Aluminum
Barium
Boron
Calcium
Cobalt
Stream
_Code ._
A-4
A-5
A-4
A-5
A-4
A-5
A-4
A-5
A-4
A-5
A-4
A-5
A-4
A-5
A-4
A-5
A-4
A-5

A-4
A-5
A-4
A-5
A-4
A-5
A-4
A-5
A-4
A-5
3
4
3
4
3
4
3
4
3
4
3
4
3
4
3 •
4
3
4

3
4
3
4
3
4
3
4
3
4
Samp 1 e
Type
<0.003
<0.003
<0.003
<0.003
<0.0005
<0.0005
<0.002
<0.002
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.084
<0.084
<0.003
<0.003
0.72
0.72

<0.050
<0.050
0. 15
0.15
<0.009
<0.009
69
69
<0.006
<0.006
Concentrations (mg/1)
Source Day
0.021
0.044
0.017
0.043
<0.0005
<0.0005
0.009
0.007
0.66
<0.001
0.2
0.023
4.8
<0.084
0.47
0.31
2.8
0.15

0.87
<0.050
0.060
0.029
1 .7
1 .8
91
73
<0.006
0.009
1 pay 2 Day 3
0.017
0.060
0.006
0.037
<0.0005
<0.0005
<0.002
0.003
0.51
<0.001
0.089
0.012
4.3
<0.084
0.39
0.35
0.34
<0.003

0.54
<0.050
0.055
0.049
1 .2
1 .4
62
75
<0.006
<0.006

-------
                           	     Table-V-268 (Continued)	

                            WASTEWATER TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA - PLANT A
                 Pollutant
                                       Stream
                                        Code
      Nonconventiona1 Po Mutants (Continued)
H
O
O
Iron


Magnesium


Manganese


Molybdenum


Sodium


Tin
A-4
A-5

A-4
A-5

A-4
A-5

A-4
A-5

A-4
A-5

A-4
A-5
3
4

3
4

3
4

3
4

3
4

3
4
<0.008
<0.008

27
27

<0.001
<0.001

<0.002
<0.002

10
10

<0. 12
<0. 12
                              Concentrations  (mg/1)
                          Source    Day 1     Day 2
                                                                    23
                                                                    <0.008

                                                                    34
                                                                    29

                                                                     0.23
                                                                     0. 10

                                                                     0.011
                                                                     0.037
                                                                   540
                                                                 3,000
   18
   <0.008

   24
   30

    0.17
    0. 13

   <0.002
    0.015
  330
2,700
                                                                    <0. 12
                                                                    <0.12
                                                                           <0. 12
                                                                           <0. 12

-------
H
O
O
00
                                         Table  V-268  (Continued)

                             WASTEWATER  TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA - PLANT A
Pol lutant
Stream
Code
Sample
Concentrations (mg/1)
Source D_aj
i 1 Day 2 Day 3
Nonconventional Pollutants (Continued)
Titanium
Vanadium
Yttrium
A-4
A-5
A-4
A-5
A-4
A-5
3
4
3
4
3
4
<0.005
<0.005
<0.003
<0.003
<0.002
<0.002
<0.005
0.013
<0.003
0.028
<0.002
0.003
<0.005
<0.005
<0.003
<0.003
<0.002
<0.002
Conventional Pollutants

Oi1  and Grease


Total Suspended Solids (TSS)


pH (standard units)
A-4
A-5
A-4
A-5
A-4
A-5
1 <1
1 <1
3 23
4 23
6.5
6.5
<1
<1
26
33
1 .40
NA
<1
<1
26
25
1
7




.31
. 1 1
       NA - Not Analyzed.

       Footnote:   No analyses were performed on the following toxic pollutants:  1  - 113, 116,
                  121,  123,  125-127, and 129.

-------
                  Table  V-269




WASTEWATER TREATMENT  PERFORMANCE DATA - PLANT B
Pol lutant
Toxic Pollutants .
6. carbon tetrach 1 ori de
	 	 	 .. '_. . .
11. 1 , 1 , 1-trichloroethane

23. chl orof orm

26. 1 , 3-d i ch 1 orobenzene

38. ethylbenzene

44. methylene chloride
H
O 62. N-ni t rosodipheny lamine
O
\D
65. phenol -

66. bis(2-ethylhexyl ) phthalate

72. benzo(a)anthracene

'86.. toluene - '

114. antimony
•
:••-•- : vis. -arsenic 	 : : ( 	 ?'
t -
117. beryl Hum

118. cadmium ., -,

srream
fnriei
»- uu c
B-7
B-8
B-7
B-8
B-7
B-8
B-7
B-8
B-7
B-8
B-7
B-8
B-7
B-8
B-7
B-8
B-7
B-8
B-7
B-8
B-7
rB-8
B-7
B-8
~B-7
B-8
B-7
B-8
.B-7
B-8
Sample Concentrations (mg/1)
Typs
1
1
1
1
1
1
6
6
1
1
1
1
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
1
. 1
6
6
"::'~ 	 6
6
6
6
= 6
6
oource
ND
ND
0.003
0.003
ND
ND
0.039
0.039
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.061
0.061
ND
ND
<0 . 0 1 0
<0.010
<0,010
<0.010
<0.005
<0.005
<0.020
<0.020
Day 1
ND
ND
ND
0 . 004
ND
0.005
ND
ND
0.054
0.018
0. 105
0.027
ND
ND
0.014
ND
0.021
ND
ND
ND
0.046
0.020
0.040
0.010 .
0.020
<0.010
<0.005
<0.005
<0.020
<0.020
Day 2
ND
ND
0.003
ND
0.005
0.005
ND
ND
0.027
0.015
0.017
0.014
ND
ND
ND
ND
.ND
0.015
ND
ND
0.046
0.025
0.090
0.030
0.020
<0.010
<0.005
<0.005
<0.020
<0.020
Day 3
0.013
.-0.012 . . .. . ----.- 	 -.
0.045
0.037
0.005
0.006
ND
ND
0.032
0.039
0.017
0.021
0.013
ND
NL>
ND
0.023
ND
ND
ND
0.084
0.096 ; '
0.040
0.050
.0.030
0.010 : -
<0.005 :
<0.005
<0.020
<0.020

-------
            Table V-269 (Continued)



WASTEWATER TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA - PLANT B


Pol lutant
Toxic
1 19.

120.

121 .

122.

123.

H
O 124.
H
O
125.

126.

127.

128.

Pollutants (Continued)
chromium (total )

copper

cyanide (total )

1 ead

mercury


ni ckel


se 1 eni um

si 1 ver

thai 1 i um

zinc

Stream
Code







B-7
B-8
B-7
B-8

B-7
B-8

B-7
B-8
B-7
B-8
B-7
B-8
B-7
B-8
Sample
Type

B-7
B-8
B-7
B-8
B-7
B-8
6
6
6
6

6
6

6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
Source

6
6
6
6
1
1
<0
<0
<0
<0

<0
<0

<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0

<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
.050
.050
.0002
.0002

.050
.050

.010
.010
.010
.010
.010
.010
.020
.020
Concentrations
Day 1

.020
.020
.050
.050
.02
.02
1
0
<0
<0

0
0

<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
2
0

0.
0.
1 .
0.
<0.
<0.
.85
.450
.0002
.0002

.200
.050

.010
.010
.010
.010
.010
.010
.22
.460
(mg/1)
Day 2

860
120
35
250
02
02
3
0
<0
<0

0
0

<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
2
0

0.980
0.160
2.00
0.250
0. 18
0.21
.45
.450
.0002
.0002

. 100
.050

.010
.010
.010
.010
.010
.010
.88
.440

Day 3

0.780
0. 100
3.35
0.600
0.34
0.82
2.70
0.300
<0.0002
<0.0002

0.100
0. 100

<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.020
3.88
0.400
Nonconvent i onal Pollutants
Acidi

Alkal

ty

inity

Al umi num


Ammonia Nitrogen


B-7
B-8
B-7
B-8
B-7
B-8
B-7
B-8
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6

-------
            Table V-269 (Continued)



WASTEWATER TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA - PLANT B
Pol 1 utant
- btream •-
Code
	 iamp-i e-
-- — — — - uoncen L ra L i ons (.ma/~iv~ — 	 	 	 • — 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 — - 	 •
Source
Day 1
Day 2
Day 3
Nonconvent ional Pollutants (Continued)
Barium
Boron
Cal cium
Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD)
Chloride
Cobalt
O
l-j Fluoride
	 Iron
Magnesium
Manganese
Mol ybdenum
Phenol i cs
Phosphate
Sodium
Sulfate
B-7
B-8
B-7
Br8
B-7
B-8
B-7
B-8
B-7
B-8
B-7
B-8
B-7
B-8
B-7
B-8
B-7
B-8
B-7
B-8
B-7
B-8
B-7
B-8
B-7
B-8
B-7
B-8
B-7
B-8
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
" 6
6
6
' 6
• 6
1
1
6
6
6
6
6
<0
<0
<0
<0
62
62
<5
<5
6
6
<0
<0
1
1
1
1
19
19
0
0
<0
<0
0
0
" 56
56
6
6
7
7
.050
.050
. 100
. 100
.0
.0


.050
.050
.2
.2
.00
.00
.7
.7
. 100
. 100
.050
.'050
.010
.010

.80
.80
.8
.8
1 .85
0.300
0.700
0.600
47
71
490
330
67
62
<0
<0
2
2
4
0
15
14
0
<0
0
0
0
0
92
19
108
98
67
180
. 1
.5


.050
.050
.6
.4
.50
.850
.5
.7
.200
.050
. 150
. 100
.021
.031

.5

3.20
0.400
0.800
0.700
55
64
280
310
81
70
<0
<0
5
3
3
0
17
13
0
<0
0
0
0
0
130
<4
127
1 19
72
160
.4
.2


.050
.•050
. 1
.3
.90
.750
.2
.9
. 150
.050
.200
. 150
.020
.034



2.70
0.300
1 .00
0.900
57
57
440
460
91
79
<0
<0
0
0
4
0
18
13
0
<0
0
0
0
0
170
9
149
134
72
120
. 1
.8


.050
.050
.47
.97
.15
.650
.5
.2
. 150
.050
.300 '
.250
.030
.030
.6



-------
                                   Table V-269 (Continued)

                       WASTEWATER TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA - PLANT B
Pol lutant
Stream
Code
Sample
Concentrations (mg/lj
Source
f),iy 1
Day 2
D.iy 1
Nonconventional Pollutants (Continued)
Tin

Titanium
Total
Total
Total
Dissolved Solids (TDS)
Organic Carbon (TOC)
Solids (TS)
Vanadium
H
O
M Yttrium
to
B-7
B-8
B-7
B-8
B-7
B-8
B-7
B-8
B-7
B-8
B-7
B-8
B-7
B-8
6
6
6
6
'6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
390
390
12
12
490
490
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
0.100
<0.050
320
300
150
110
790
660
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
0.050
<0.050
730
730
120
130
1 , 100
1 ,000
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050

-------
                  Table V-270




WASTEWATER TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA - PLANT D
Toxic
1 1 .
22.
23.
34.
44.
66.
£ 81."
H
OJ
86.
1 14.
115.
117,
1 18.
119.'
120.
121 .
. . Pol lutant . 	
Pol lutants
1,1, 1-tri chl oroethane
p-chl oro-m-cresol <
ch 1 orof orm
2 , 4-dimethy 1 pheno 1
methylene chloride
bis(2-ethy 1 hexy 1 ) phthalate ;
phenanthrene :
to 1 uene
ant imony
arsenic
beryl 1 i urn ' . * 1
cadmium • :
chromium (tota:l) :-' ;
copper
cyanide (total)
Stream Sampl e
	 Code .. . Type
D-20
	 D-21" "
D-20
D-21
D-20
D-21
D-20
D-21
D-20
D-21 '
D-20
D-21
D-20
D-21
D-20
D-21
D-20
D-21 -
D-20
D-20 " . -
D-21.
D-20 :.
.. . '. .D-21. . :, ......
D-20
D-21
D-20
D-21
D-20
D-21
1
-•,•--••-
6
6
1
1
6
6
1
1
6
6
6
6
1
1 ,
6
6
6
6
-6
6
.6 .... ...
6
6
6
6
1
1
Concentrations (mg/1)
. Source
0.009
" 0 . 009
ND
ND
0.144
0. 144
: ND
ND
0.002
'0.002
; 0.009
0.009
ND
ND
ND
ND
<0.003
<0.003
<0.003
<0.0005
<0.0005
<0.002
:.; <0.002
0.042
0.042
0.068
0.068
<0.02
<0.02
Day 1
0.007
0 . 0"1 3 '
ND
ND
0.001
0.013
ND
0.048
0.001
0.002
1 .260
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
<0.003
<0.003
<0.003
<0.0005
<0.005
7.3
0.051
718
0.83
4.8
0.40
0.41
0. 1 1
.Day 2
0.006
0.008
ND
ND
ND
0.012
: ND
ND
0.002
0.003
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
<0.003
<0.003
<0.003
~r-<0."003 "
<0.0005
0.002
5.3
0.017
120
0.20
3.5
0.050
1 .5
0.51
Day 3 ... . . .
0.008
6.014" .-.---..
ND
0.375
0.002
0.01 1
0.028
ND
0.007
0.012
ND
ND
0.002
NO
0.002
ND
<0.003
<0.003
<0.003
- ;f0.003~
<0.0005
<0.0005
7.6
0.002 - ..-- -
1.60 ' . .
0.18
5.1
0.029
1 .6
0.33

-------
            Table V-270 (Continued)



WASTEWATER TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA - PLANT D
Pol lutant
Toxic Pollutants (Continued)
122. lead
123. mercury
1 24. nickel
125. selenium
126. silver
127. thallium
128. zinc
Nonconvent i ona 1 • Pol lutants
Acidity
Al kal ini ty
A 1 umi num
Ammonia Nitrogen
Barium
Boron
Cal c i urn
Stream
Code
Sample
D-20
D-21
D-20
D-21
D-20
D-21
D-20
D-21
D-20
D-21
D-20
D-21
D-20
D-21
D-20
D-21
D-20
D-21
D-20
D-21
D-20
D-21
D-20
D-21
D-20
D-21
D-20
D-21
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
Concentrations
Source Day 1
6 <0.084 0.
6 -<0.084 <0.
6 <0.0002 <0.
6 <0.0002 <0.
6
6
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
0
0
<,
180
180
<0
<0
<]
0
0
<0
<0
63
63
<0.003
<0.003
.003
.003
.001
.001
.003
.003
.038
.038


.050
.050

. 12
. 12
.009
.009

<0
<0
0
0
<0
<0
1
0
80
96
32
0
0
0
0
0
14
<0
1 ,900
960
340
3.
.003
.003
.013
.008
.003
.003
.9
.021


. 14
. 15
.35
.83
.23
.009

(ma/1
)

Day 2 Day 3
72 0.66 0.80
084 0.19 <0.084
0002 <0.0002 <0.0002
0002 <0.0002 <0.0002
5
<0
<0
0
0
<0
<0
1
0
' -
1 ,600
1 1 1
37
0
0
1
0
0
9
<0
1 ,600
900
300 340
0.82 0.83
.003
.003
.012
.008
.003
.003
.4
.007


. 15
.35
.2
.72
.22
.7
.009


-------
              Table V-270  (Continued)




_WASTEWATER TREATMENT__PERFORMANCE^ DATA _-_.PLANT, D_

Pol 1 utant
Nonconvent i onal Pollutants (Cont
Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD)

Chloride

Cobalt

Fl uoride

Iron

H
O Magnesium
H
tn
Manganese

Mo 1 ybdenum

Phosphate :

Sbffi urn
Sulfate ' •
,
•• • • Tin 	

Ti tanium

Total Dissolved Solids (TDS)

Total Organic Carbon (TOO

Stream
Code
inued)
D-20
D-21
D-20
D-21
D-20
D-21
D-20
D-21
D-20 .
D-21
D-20
D-21

D-20
D-21
D-20
D-21
D-20
D-21
D-20 	
D-21
D-20
D-21
D-20 '
D-21
D-20
D-21
D-20
D-21
D-20
D-21
Sampl e
Type

6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6

6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
...'..6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
Concentrations (mg/1 ) - - - 	
Source

<5
<5
34
34
<0.006
<0.006
0.45
0.45
0.066
0.066
24
24

0.012
0.012
0.030
0.030
<4
<4
"-" "9.5 	
9.5
53
53
<0 . 1 2
<0. 12
<0.005
<0.005
393
393
8
8
Day 1

130
80
200
170
55
0.34
2. 1
2.7
190
1 .2
43
20

5.2
0.087
44
19
21
<4
770" "
600
2,200
3,600

-------
                                    Table V-270 (Continued)

                        WASTEWATER TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA - PLANT D

Pol 1 utant
Stream
Code
Sample
Concentrations (mg/1)
Source
Day 1
Day 2
Da
y 3
Nonconvent ional Pollutants (Continued)



H
O
a\

Total Solids (TS)
Vanadium
Yttrium
Conventional Pollutants
Oi 1 and Grease
Total Suspended Solids
pH (Standard Units)
0-20
D-21
D-20
D-21
D-20
D-21
D-20
D-21
(TSS) D-20
D-21
D-20
D-21
6
6
6
e
6
6
1
1
6
6
6
6
395
395
0.016
0.016
<0.002
<0.002
<1
<1
<1
<1
7. 14
7. 14
12,000 10
6,200 6
4.3
0.056
0.099
0.006
91
5
8,300 5
53
3.90
6.73
,000
,000
3.1
0.11
0.043
0.020
120
5
,200
30
9.02
6.43
5,700
5,600
4.
0.
0.
0.
790
10
770
23
7.
6.

6
035
051
007


81
47
1.   The following toxic pollutants were not detected at this plant:   1-10, 12-21, 24-33,
    35-43, 45-65, 67-80,  82-85,  87,  and 88.

2.   No analyses were performed on the following toxic pollutants:  89-113, 116, and 129.

-------
Tab le_V-27.1
WASTEWATER TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA -
Pol 1 utant
Toxic "Pol r'uta'rits"
5 . benzidi ne


11. 1 , 1 , l -tri ch 1 oroethane


12. hexach 1 oroethane


13. 1 , 1-dichI oroethane
H
O
1 — '
<1 22. p-chl oro-m-cresol


23. chloroform


27. 1 ,4-di chl orobenzene


28. 3,3'-dichlorobenzidine


77 " '" 34. 2,4-dimethylphenol


36. 2,6-dini tnotoluene


37. 1 , 2-dipheny 1 hydrazine


Stream
Code

E-6
E-7
E-8
E-6
E-7
E-8
E-6
E-7
E-8
E-6
E-7
E-8
E-6
E-7
E-8
E-6
E-7
E-8
E-6
• • , -• •£•-7" 	 " "
E-8
E-6
E-7
E-8
E-6
E-7
E-8
E-6
E-7
E-8
E-6
E-7
E-8
Sampl e
Type

3
3
1
1
1
1
3
3
1
1
1
1
3
3
1
1
1
1
3
- 	 T3 "" 	 '
1
3
3
1 -
3
,3
. '
3
3
•1
3
3
1
PLANT E
Concentrat i
Source

0.762
0.762
0.762
0.005
0.005
0.005
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.015
0.015
0.015
ND
" 	 ND " ""
ND
0.001
0.001
0.001
ND
ND
ND
0.002
0 . 002
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.001
Day 1

0.010
**

0.540
0.490

ND
0.006

ND
0.040

0.680
**

ND
ND

ND
ND

0.810
0.001

**
0.046

0.001
0.002

0.001
0.001


ons (mg/ 1 )
Day 2

1 . 159
**

0.720
0.490

0.006
0.006

ND
0.035

ND
ND

ND
0.015

ND
ND

0.010
0.001

**
0.053

0.001
0.003

0.001
0.001



Day 3

0.576
' 0.033
0.965
0.820
0.960
0.020
ND
ND
0.006
0.005
0.025
ND
**
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.005
ND / :
0.019
0.519 • . . '
ND
ND
0.046
ND
0.001
0.001
0.002
0.001
0.001
ND

-------
                                         Table V-271  (Continued)

                            WASTEWATER  TREATMENT  PERFORMANCE  DATA  -  PLANT E
O
H
00
Pollutant

Toxic Pollutants (Continued)



 39.  fluoranthene




 43.  bi s (2-choroethoxy)rnethane




 44.  methylene chloride




 55.  naphthalene




 61.  N~nitrosodimethy1 amine




 62.  N-nitrosodipheny1amine




 63.  N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine




 65.  phenol
      66.  bis(2-ethyIhexy1)
           phthalate
      67.  butyl  benzyl  phthalate
      70.  diethyl  phthalate
Stream
Code
E-6
E-7
E-8
E-6
E-7
E-8
E-6
E-7
E-8
E-6
E-7
E-8
E-6
E-7
E-8
E-6
E-7
E-8
E-6
E-7
E-8
E-6
E-7
E-8
E-6
E-7
E-8
E-6
E-7
E-8
E-6
E-7
E-8
Sample
Type
3
3
1
3
3
1
1
1
1
3
3
1
3
3
1
3
3
1
3
3
1
3
3
1
3
3
1
3
3
1
3
3
1
Concentrations (mg/1)
Source
ND
ND
ND
0.001
0.001
0.001
ND
ND
ND
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
ND
ND
ND
0.024
0.024
0.024
ND
ND
ND
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
<0. 00001
<0. 00001
<0. 00001
Day 1
0.001
ND

ND
0.001

0.160
ND

0.002
0.001

0.001
ND

ND
ND

0.018
0.016

**
**

**
0.030

0.003
0.004 .

ND
0.0001

Day 2
0.001
0.001

0.001
0.0002

ND
ND

0.001
0.001

0.001
ND

ND
ND

0.021
0.020

**
**

0.003
0.002

0.002
0.002

0.001
0.0001

Day 3
0.001
ND
ND
0.002
0.0003
0.0001
ND
ND
ND
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.001
ND
0.001
ND
ND
0.196
0.016
0.032
0.023
**
**
ND
**
0.001
0.002
0.005
0.003
0.001
ND
ND
0.0001

-------
             Table V-271 (Continued)




WASTEWATER TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA - PLANT E
Stream
• • Pol lutant ' - . . . Code
Toxic Pollutants (Continued)
71. dimethyl phthalate E-6
E-7
E-8 '
72. benzo('a)anthracene E-6
E-7
E-8
73. benzo(a)pyrene E-6
E-7
E-8
75. benzo(k)f 1 uoranthene E-6
E-7
. |_i E-8
O
H 76. chrysene - E-6
VD E-7
- E-8
78. anthracene E-6
E-7
E-8
81. phenanthrene E-6
E-7
E-8
83. indeno( 1 , 2 , 3-c ,d)py rene 'T E-6
E-7
; : . E-8
84. pyrene : E-6
	 :• •-•'- ' ' " ~ ~ ' ' ' ---- £-7 ' - ''-
; E-8
?
86. toluene E-6
-. E-7
, E-8
114. antimony E-6
• E-7
E-8
E-9
Sampl e
Type


3
3
1
3
3
1
3
3
1
3
3
1

3
3
1
3
3
1
3
3 .
1
'3
3 ' i
, 1
"''.I 3 ;
- 3
i ;

1 ;
i
. i
3
3
1
3
Concentrations (mg/1)
Source


ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND

ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
HQ
ND'
ND
ND :
ND
' - ND
ND :

ND
ND
ND
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
Day 1

ND
ND

ND
0.0002

1 7 . 40
ND

**
ND


ND
ND

0.002
ND

ND
0.001

ND
ND

0.001
o.oor :


ND
ND

<0.005
<0.005
<0.005

Day 2

0.004
0.001

ND
0.0001

ND
ND

ND
**


ND
ND

ND
0.001

0.001
0.001

ND
ND

0.001
0.001 "


ND
ND

<0.005
<0.005

<0.005
Day 3

ND
ND
0.003
**
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
**
ND

**
**
ND
0.002
0.001
ND
. ND
ND
. 0-rOQ-l -
0.001
ND
ND
0.001
0.001
ND

ND
0.015
ND
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005


-------
                                          Table V-271  (Continued)

                             WASTEWATER TREATMENT  PERFORMANCE  DATA  -  PLANT  E
      Pollutant
      Toxic Pol 1utants  (Continued)
                                      Stream
                                       Code
                                                                    Concentrations  (mg/1)
                                                             Source
O
N)
O
      115.  arsenic
      117.  beryl 1ium
      118.  cadmi um
      1 19 .  chromium  ( total)
      120.  copper
      121.  cyanide  (total)
      122.  lead
      123.  mercury
E-6
E-7
E-8
E-9

E-6
E-7
E-8
E-9

E-6
E-7
E-8
E-9

E-6
E-7
E-8
E-9

E-6
E-7
E-8
E-9

E-6
E-7
E-8
E-9

E-6
E-7
E-8
E-9

E-6
E-7
E-8
E-9
3
3
• 1
3

3
3
1
3

3
3
1
3

3
3
1
3

3
3
1
3

1
1
1
1

3
3
1
3

3
3
1
3
0
0
0
:0
:0
0
0
0
:0
:0
0
:0
:0
:Q
:0
:0
0
0
0
0
:.0
:Q
:Q
:Q
:0
:0
:0
:0
.0
:0
:0
:0
.005
.005
.005
.005
.010
.010
.010
.010
.050
.050
.050
.050
. 100
. 100
.100
. 100
.080
.080
.080
.080
.02
.02
.02
.02
. 100
. 100
. 100
. 100
.0010
.0010
.0010
.0010
<0
<0
<0

<0
<0
<0

<0
<0
<0

<0
<0
2

0
0
14

<0
<0
<0

0
0
<0

<0
<0
<0

.005
.005
.005

.010
.010
.010

.050
.050
.050

. 100
. 100
.15

.620
. 100
.0

.02
.02
.02

.240
. 100
. 100

.0010
.0010
.0010

<0
<0

<0
<0
<0

<0
<0
<0

<0
<0
<0

<0
0
0

0
<0
<0

<0
0
<0

<0
<0
<0

<0
.005
.005

.005
.010
.010

.010
.050
.050

.050
. 100
. 100

. 100
. 180
. 110

. 140
.02
.02

.02
.220
.100

. 100
.0010
.0010

.0010
<0
<0
<0

<0
<0
<0


-------
                                            Table  V-271  (Continued)

                               WASTEWATER  TREATMENT  PERFORMANCE DATA - PLANT E
O
tO
        Pol 1utant

        Toxi c  Po;l 1 utants  (Continued)

        124.   nickel
        1 25.  seleni urn
        126.  silver
        1 27.  th.al 1 ium-
        128.  zinc
       Nonconventional Pollutants
                                        Stream-
                                         Code
E-6
E-7
E-8
E-9

E-6
E-7
E-8
E-9

E-6
E-7
E-8
E-9

E-6
E-7
E-8
E-9

E-6
Er-7
E-8
E-9
                         	Concent rat Ions - (tng/ l.J
 3
 3
. 1
 3

 3
 3
 1
 3

 3
 3
 1
 3

 3
 3
 1
 3

 3
 3
 1
 3
                                                              Source
<0. 100
<0.100
<0.100,
<0.100

<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010

<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002

<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002

<0.050
<0.050-
<0.050
<0.050
                                                                         0.510
                                                                        <0.100
                                                                        24.6-  -
                                                                        <0.010
                                                                        <0.010
                                                                        <0.010
                                                                        <0.002
                                                                        <0.002
                                                                        <0.002
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
                                                                         0.310
                                                                         0.080
                                                                         0.370
<0.100
<0. 100

<0.100

<0.010
<0.010

<0.010

<0.002
<0.002

<0.002

<0;002
<0.002

<0.002

 0. 100
 0.110

<0.050
                      1 .30
                      0.100
                   183
                    <0.010
                    <0.010
                    <0.010
                    <0.002
                    <0.002
                    <0.002
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
                     0.240
                     0.080
                     1 .40
Acidi ty
A 1 kal i ni ty
. .-- . i :~ ~ - -
; ~ = .
A 1 uminum ,



Ammonia Nitrogen



E-6
E-7
E-8
E-9
E-6
E-7
E-8
E-9
E-6
E-7
E-8
E-9
E-6
E-7
E-8
E-9
3
3
1
3
3
3
1
3
3
3
1
3
3
3
1
3
<1
<1
<1
<1
83
83
83
8:3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0



.300
.300
.300
.300
.22
.22
.22
.22
<1
<1
130
120
230
<1

0
0
0

0
0
0




.800,
. 140
.960

.19
. 14
.55

<1
<1
-<1
T50
reo
250
0
0



.200
. 160
<1
<1
198
150
160
<1

0
0

",

.500
. 150
<0.020
0
0
0

30
.040
. 19
. 14



0
9
130


.37
.3



-------
                                           Table V-271  (Continued)

                              WASTEWATER TREATMENT  PERFORMANCE  DATA  - PLANT E
       Pollutant
                                       Stream
                                        Code
                                                                     Concentrations (mg/1)
       Nonconventional Pollutants  (Continued)
       Barium
       Boron
       Calcium
o
to
N)
       Chemical Oxygen Demand  (COD)
       Chloride
       Cobalt
       F1uori de
       Iron
       Magnes i urn
E-6
E-7
E-8
E-9

E-6
E-7
E-8
E-9

E-6
E-7
E-8
E-9

E-6
E-7
E-8
E-9

E-6
E-7
E-8
E-9

E-6
E-7
E-8
E-9

E-6
E-7
E-8
E-9

E-6
E-7
E-8
E-9

E-6
E-7
E-8
E-9
3
3
1
3

3
3
1
3

3
3
1
3

3
3
1
3

3
3
1
3

3
3
1
3

3
3
1
3

3
3
1
3

3
3
1
3
Source
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
33
33
33
33
34
34
34
34
26
26
26
26
<0
<0
<0
<0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
15
15
15
15
.060
.060
.060
.060
. 170
. 170
. 170
.170
.0
.0
.0
.0








. 100
. 100
. 100
. 100
.44
.44
.44
.44
.00
.00
.00
.00
.8
.8
.8
.8
Day 1
0
0
0

0
0
0

34
34
18

330
470
50

24
31
35

<0
<0
<0

0
0
0

3
2
31

14
15
6

. 120
. 110
.030

.400
.590
.200

.2
.6
.4









.100
. 100
. 100

.39
.44
.40

.50
.50
.0

.4
.6
.00

Day 2
0
0

<0
0
0

0
32
36

9
18
460

<0
24
29

40
<0
<0

<0
0
0

0
1
2

0
15
15

3
.080
. 100

.020
. 140
.480

. 100
.8
.5

.70



.05




. 100
. 100

. 100
.69
.30

.39
.60
.60

. 120
.0
.8

.00
Da
0.
0.
0.

0.
0.
0.

30.
32.
18.

890
460
52

21
28
78

<0.
<0.
<0.

0.
0.
0.

2.
4.
32.

13.
13.
6.

y a
070
080
040

460
510
470

4
5
9









100
100
100

64
75
52

40
40
5

3
8
20


-------
             Table V-271 (Continued)




WASTEWATER TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA - PLANT E
Stream
	 Pol lutant" • - Code
Nonconvent i onal Pollutants (Continued)
- . ... Manganese .....,., , ... E-6
E-7
E-8
E-9
Molybdenum E-6
E-7
E-8
E-9
Phenol ics E-6
E-7
. E-8
E-9
H
O Phosphate E-6
ISJ E-7
LO E-8
E-9
Sodium E-6
E-7
E-8
E-9
Sulfate E-6
E-7
E-8
: • • - • ' E-9
; Tin £-6
E-7
E-8
: E-9
Titanium E-6
E-7
E-8
: E-9
Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) E-6
E-7
E-8
E-9
Sampl e
Type

	 3
3
1
3
3
3
1
3
1
1
1
• 1
3
3
1
3
3
3
1
3
3
3
1
3
3
3
1
3 ,
3
3
1 , •
3
3
3
1
3
Concentrat
Source

0.
0.
0.
0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
16
16
16
16
33.
33.
33.
33.
170
170
170
170
: <0 .
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
.330
330
330
330

140
140
140
140
200
200
200
200
014
014
014
014




0
0
0
0




200
200
200
200
020
020
020
020




Day 1

0
0
0

<0
<0
<0

8
13
0

21
2:i
<4

71
83
58

170
120
7QO

<0
<0
<0

<0
<0
0

470
720
920


.-100
. 170
.630

.200
.200
.200

.5

.016





.0
.0
.0





.200
.200
.200

.020
.020
.090





i ons
(nig/1
Day 2

... o
0

0
<0
<0

<0
2
1 1

0
18
28

13
75
80

292
190
150

580
<0
<0

<0
<0
<0

<0
360
420

860

;080
. 160

.018
.200
.200

.200
.4


.032




.0
.0






.200
.200

.200
.020
.020

.020




1)
Da

	 0.
0.
2.

<0
<0
<0

9
13
0

30
27
<4

80
73
133

190
130
- -laoo.


-------
                                    Table V-271 (Continued)

                       WASTEWATER TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA - PLANT E

Pol lutant
Stream
Code
Sample
Type
Concentrations (mg/l]
Source
Day 1
Day 2
1
Day 3
Nonconventional Pollutants (Continued)
Total Organic Carbon



Total Solids (TS)



Vanadi urn



Yttrium



Conventional Pollutants
Oi 1 and Grease



Total Suspended Solids



pH (standard units)



E-6
E-7
E-8
E-9
E-6
E-7
E-8
E-9
E-6
E-7
E-8
E-9
E-6
E-7
E-8
E-9

E-6
E-7
E-8
E-9
E-6
E-7
E-8
E-9
E-6
E-7
E-8
E-9
3
3
1
3
3
3
1 '
3
3
3
1
3
3
3
1
3

1
1
1
1
3
3
1
3
3
3
1
3
<,
<1
<1
.<'
380
380
380
380
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020

<,
< i
<1
<1
29
29
29
29
6.71
6.71
6.71
6.71
68
110
10

590
830
930

<0.010
<0.010
<0.010

<0.020
<0.020
<0.020


350
76
3

220
13
7.4

6.12
6.01
2.71

89
150

<1
470
600

900
<0.010
<0.010

<0.010
<0.020
<0.020

<0.020

340
32

5
33
16

2.3
6.56
6.24

8.50
110
67
3.9

800
690
2070

<0.010
<0.010
<0.010

<0.020
<0.020
<0.020


420
45
<1

250
74
7.3

6.91
6.10
2.74

1.   The following toxic pollutants were not detected at this plant:   1-4, 6-10, 14-21,
    24-26, 29-33, 35, 38,  40-42,  45-54, 56-60,  64, 68, 69,  74, 77,  79,  80, 82, 85, 87,
    and 88.

2.   No analyses were performed on the following toxic pollutants:   89-113, 116, and 129.

**Present, but not quantifiable.

-------
                    Table V-272




.-WASTEWA-T-ER-TREATMENT—PERFORMANCE- DATA - -PLANT- F

Pol 1 utant
Toxic Pollutants
11. 1 , 1 , 1 -trichl oroetnane



23. chloroform



44. methylene chloride


H'
O 55. naphthalene
NJ
CJ1


58. 4-ni tropheno 1



64. pentach 1 orophenol



66. bis(2-ethy Ihexyl ) phthalate



:: . 68. di-n-buty 1 ' phthal ate



81 . phenanthrene



Stream
Code

F-31
F-32
F-33
F-34
F-31
F-32
F-33
F-34
F-31
F-32
F-33
F-34
F-31
F-32
F-33
F-34
F-31
F-32
' F-33
F-34
F-31
F-32
F-33
F-34
F-31
- F-32
; F-33
; "F-34
'. • F-31
F-32
F-33
F-34
F-31
F-32
F-33
; F-34
S atrip 1 e
Type

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
4
1
1
4
4
1
1 	 :
4
4
1 -
1
4
' 4
1 -
1
' 4
4
1
1
4
4
Concent rat ions
Source Day 1

0.014 -ND
0.014
0.014
0.014
ND ND
ND
ND
ND
0.002 1.170
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.001 ND
0.001
0.001
0.001
ND ND
ND
ND
ND
ND 0.818
.. ._ ND ! . - 	 - 	 . — ... -
ND *
ND
ND NO
ND ! :
ND
ND .- ; "
ND ND
• ND ' .
ND
ND
ND 0.364
ND
ND
ND
(mg/1)
Day 2

ND
ND
ND
0.012
ND
ND
ND
0.006
4.940
1 . 150
0.040
0.005
0.398
ND
0.001
0.001
0.250
ND
ND
ND
0.981
- ND - -
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.004
ND "
-ND
0.105
0.001
ND
0.896
ND
ND
ND

Day 3

ND
ND
0.01 1
ND .
ND
ND
ND
ND '.
0.494
0.095
0.002
ND
0.744
0.353
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.080
_. -NO 	 	 - - _ 	 	 - - - -• - — . - 	 — -
. ND . .
ND
ND
ND
0.004 '',..
ND _-.--- . .- .--
. ND -
ND '
ND
ND
'0.947
ND
ND
ND - . -

-------
                                          Table V-272 (Continued)

                              WASTEWATER TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA - PLANT F
O
E-O
                 Pollutant
      Toxic Pollutants (Continued)
       86.  toluene
      114.  antimony
      115.  arseni c
117.   beryl 1i urn
      118.  cadmi urn
      119.  chromium (total)
      120.  copper
      121.  cyanide (total)
      122.  lead
                                             Stream
                                              Code
F-31
F-32
F-33
F-34

F-31
F-32
F-33
F-34

F-31
F-32
F-33
F-34

F-31
F-32
F-33
F-34

F-31
F-32
F-33
F-34

F-31
F-32
F-33
F-34

F-34
F-34
F-34
F-34

F-31
F-32
F-33
F-34

F-31
F-32
F-33
F-34
                                                                     Concentrations
1
1
1
1

1
1
4
4

1
1
4
4

1
1
4
4

1
1
4
4

1
1
4
4

1
1
4
4

1
1
1
1

1
1
4
4
Source
ND
ND
ND
Day 1
ND
ND
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
0
0
0
0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
.002
.002
.002
.002
.005
.005
.005
.005
.010
.010
.010
.010
.050
.050
.050
.050
.100
. 100
. 100
. 100
.170
. 170
. 170
. 170
.02
.02
.02
.02
. 100
. 100
. 100
.100
0.015

<0.002
0.005
0.025

<0.005
<0.005
<0.010

<0.010
<0.010
<0.050

<0.050
<0.050
<0. 100

3. 16
0. 170
4.10

21.2
0.630
<0.02

<0.02
<0.02
2.40

<0. 100
<0. 100
Day 2
ND
ND
0.047
ND
0
0
0
0
0
<0
0
0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
4
0
3
0
5
0
26
0
<0
<0
<0
<0
2
1
0
<0
.015
.015
.003
.004
.016
.005
.021
.020
.010
.010
.010
.010
.050
.050
.050
.050
. 15
.870
.82
. 110
. 17
.590
.5
.450
.02
.02
.02
.02
.69
.73
.110
. 100
Day 3
ND
ND
ND
ND
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
0.
0.
0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
0.
0.
7.
0.
1 .
0.
52.
0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
0.
1 .
0.
<0.
002
002
002
002
005
005
009
010
010
010
010
010
050
050
050
050
940
980
78
100
10
280
0
360
02
02
02
02
530
46
190
100

-------
                                     Table V-272 (Continued)

                        -WAS-TEWATER-  TREATMENT- PERFORMANCE -DATA - PLANT F
           Pollutant
Toxic Pollutants  (Continued)
123.   mercury
124.   nickel
125.   selenium
126.   silver
Stream
 Code
 F-31
 F-32
 F-33
 F-34

 F-31
 F-32
 F-33
 F-34

 F-31
 F-32
 F-33
 F-34

 F-31
 F-32
 F-33
 F-34
1
1
4
4

1
1
4
4

1
1
4
4

1
1
4
4
i'l-ft KUAN 1 1- 	 . . -
Concentrations (mg/1)
Source
<0
<0
<0
<0
0
0
0
0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
.0020
.0020
.0020
.0020
.200
.200
.200
.200
.010
.010
.010
.010
.002
.002
.002
.002
Day 1
<0.0020

<0.0020
<0.0020
23.6

113
3.79
<0.010

0.011
0.019
0.003

<0 . 002
<0.002
Day 2
<0
<0
<0
<0
39.
18.
190
2.
<0.
<0 ,

-------
r
                                                       TaDle \f-272  (Continued)

                                           WASTEWATER TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA - PLANT F
             O
             to
             00
                              Pollutant
                   Toxic Pollutants  (Continued)
                   127.  thallium
                   128.  zinc
                   Nonconventional  Po11utants
                   Acidity
                   Alkalinity
                   Alumi num
                   Ammonia Nitrogen
                   Barium
                   Boron
St
ream Sample
Code
F-31
F-32
F-33
F-34
F-31
F-32
F-33
F-34
F-31
F-32
F-33
F-34
F-31
F-32
F-33
F-34
F-31
F-32
F-33
F-34
F-31
F-32
F-33
F-34
F-31
F-32
F-33
F-34
F-31
F-32
F-33
F-34
1
1
4
4
1
1
4
4
1
1
4
4
1 -
1
4
4
1
1
4
4
1
1
4
4
1
1
4
4
1
1
4
4
Type
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<1
<1
<1
<1
61
61
61
61
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
<0
<0

-------
                                            Table V-272  (Continued)

                                WASTEWATER TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA -  PLANT  F
                   Pollutant

        Nonconvent i ona1  Pollutants (Continued)

        Calcium                          F-31
         -   -            	' -  ' '"      F-32
                                         F-33
                                         F-34
        Stream
         Code
O
M
AQ
       Chemical  Oxygen  Demand (COD)
       Chloride
       Cobalt
       Fluoride
       Iron-
       Magnesium
      Manganese
      Molybdenum
  F-31
  F-32
  F-33
  F-34

  F-31
  F-32
  F-33
  F-34

  F-31
  F-32
  F-33
  F-34

  F-31
  F-32
  F-33
  F-34

  F-31
  F-32
  F-33
- -F-34- -

  F-31
  F-32
  F-33
  F-34

 F-31
 F-32
 F-33
 F-34

 F-31
 F-32
 F-33
 F-34
                             Source
                                                                       Concentrations  (mg/1)
1
1
4
4
1
1
4
4
1
1
4
4
1
1
4
4
1
1
4
4
1
1
4
- 4"
1
1
4
4
1
1
4
4
1
1
4
4
46.2
46.2
46.2
46.2
<1
<1
<1
<1
12
12
12
12
<0.100
<0. 100
<0.100
<0. TOO
0.43
0.43
0.43
. 0.43
1 .37
1 .37
1 .37
T.37 "
12.7
12.7
12.7
12.7
0.080
0.080
0.080
0.080
<0.200
<0.200
<0.200
<0.200
30.1

34.9
22.2
46,000

8
<1
30

130
120
0. 130
<0. 100
<0. 100
37

31
24
58.4

25.2
1 .33
6.44

10.5
7.02
0.980
3.88
0. 120
0.420
0.440
<0.200
~34.7
34.7
25.0
21.9
18,000
7,900
55
43
61
20
180
170
0.310
0. 120
<0. 100
<0. 100
13
19
40
27
80.0
49.0
50.0
0.790
9.29
6.80
8.03
7.83
1 .40
0.860
5.34
0.070
0.830
<0.200
0.610
<0.200
- -9.30 • •• -• -.-..--. .- - 	
44.5
31.4
36.8
23,000
4,900
93
8
34
22
330
310
<0. 100
0.140
<0.100
<0. 100
16
1 2
108
160
16.6
48 . 1
. - as-.j .- _ 	 .. _.. . - 	 	 .. _ ._ .
0. 180 ;. : i
1 . 46 • ;
7.63 "
9.03
13.8,'
0.260 • - '
1 .02
5.20
0.230
<0.200
<0.200
1 .99
1.51

-------
                                         Table V-272  (Continued)

                             WASTEWATER TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA - PLANT f
                Pollutant
     Nonconventiona1  Pollutants  (Continued)
O
OJ
O
      Phenolics
      Phosphate
      Sodi urn
      Sulfate
      Tin
       Ti tanium
       Total  Dissolved Solids (TDS)
       Total Organic Carbon (TOO
       Total Sol ids (TS)
Stn
Coi
nued)
F-31
F-32
F-33
F-34
F-31
F-32
F-33
F-34
F-31
F-32
F-33
F-34
F-31
F-32
F-33
F-34
F-31
F-32
F-33
F-34
F-31
F-32
F-33
F-34
F-31
F-32
F-33
F-34
F-31
F-32
F-33
F-34
F-31
F-32
F-33
F-34

Concentrati
de Type Source Day 1
1 <0.005
1 <0.005
1 <0.005
1 <0.005
1 <4
1 <4
4 <4
4 <4
1 154
1 154
4 154
4 154
1 130
1 130
4 130
4 130
1 <0.200
1 <0.200
4 <0.200
4 <0.200
1 <0.020
1 <0.020
4 <0.020
4 <0.020
1 320
1 320
4 320
4 320
1 2
1 2
4 2
4 2
1 330
1 330
4 330
4 330
0.49
<0.005
<0.005
53
<4
<4
31 .2
640
1 ,010 1 ,
330
640
610
<0.200
<0.200
<0.200
0. 100
0.310
0.020
5,070 130
8
2,500 3
3,000 3
4,600 3
1

4

ons V">R/
Day
1.2
0.12
<0.005
<0.005
23
40
<4
<4
14.2
26.4
820
200
230
930
850
940
<0.200
<0.200
<0.200
<0.200
0.200
0.020
0.440
<0.020
,000
,110
,400
,900
,800
, 600
4
4

41 ,800 340,000
8,200
2,700 3,900
3,140 3,900
i i
2 Day 5
0. 15
0.12
<0.005
<0.005
39
34
<4
<4
5 50
27.8
1 ,580
4,200
370
750
1 ,400
1 ,400
<0.200
<0.200
<0.200
<0.200
0.040
<0.020
0.960
<0.020
3,040
1 ,700
6, 100
6,800
3,600
25
1 1
5

70,000
4,000
6,600
6,800

-------
                                      Table V-272 (Continued)
	 WAbltWATER TREATMENT PERFORMANCE "DATA - PLANT F - - - -
pnii,,tnnt S*ream Sfmple -• Concentrations (ma/11
—
Nonconventional Pollutants (Continupril
Vanadium F-31
F-32
F-33
F-34
Yttrium F-31
F-32
F-33
F-34
Conventional Pollutants
Oi 1 and Grease F-31
H c-32
° F 11
w h -^
l_i F-34
Total Suspended Solids (TSS) F^-31
F-32
F-33
F-34
pH (standard .uni ts) F-31
F-32
F-33
F-34


1
1
4
4
1
1
4
4

1

1
1
1
1
4
4
1
1
' 4
4
i yue i

<0. 010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020

<1
<1
<1
<1
22
22
22
22
6.64
6.64
6.64
6.64
>ource Da^

0.030
<0.010
<0.010
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020

4,700 12

17
4
8,400 2
100
30
5. 14
4.29
8.89
'. 1. Day

<0.010
<0. 010
<0.010
0.010
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020

,000 59
310
18
<1
,400 16
144
240
27
4.88
2.36
7. 13
. . 9 -.4.1 ..
2 Day 3

<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020

,000
380
10
<1
,500 - -
260
700
58
4.78
2.38
7.27
9.20
"1.   The following toxic pollutants were not  detected at  this plant:   1-10,  12-22, 24-43,
     45-54,  5.6,  57,  59-63,  65,  67,  69-80,  82-85,  87,  and  88.


 2 .  : No  analyses were  performed on  the  following  toxic pollutants:   89-113,  116,  and 129.

-------
                                             Table V-273

                           WASTEWATER TREATMENT PERFORMANCE
                DATA - PLANT I
CO
              Pol lutant

   Toxic  Pol lutants

     11.   1 , 1 , 1-trichloroethane
     14.   1 , 1 , 2-trichl oroethane
     29.   1 , 1-dichl oroethyl ene
     30.  1 , 2-trans-dichl oroethyl ene
     44.  methylene chloride
     65.  phenol
      66.   bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
      85.   tetrachloroethylene
      86.   toluene
      87.  trichloroethylene
     114.  antimony
                                          Stream
                                           Code
1-11
1-12
1-13

1-11
1-12
1-13

1-11
1-12
1-13

1-11
1-12
1-13

1-11
1-12
1-13

1-11
 1-12
 1-13

 1-11
 1-12
 1-13

 1-11
 1-12
 1-13

 1-1 1
 1-12
 1-13

 1-1 1
 1-12
 1-13

 1-11
 1-12
 1-13
1
1
1

1
1
1

1
1
1

1
1
1

1
1
1

4
1.3
4

4
1 ,3
 4

 1
 1
 1

 1
 1
 1

 1
 1
 1 "

'4
 3
 4
	 Concentrat i ons
Source Day 2
0.022
0.022
0.022 0.012
ND
ND
ND ND
ND
ND
ND ND
ND
ND
ND 0.022
0.003
0.003
0.003 0.028
ND
ND
ND 0.004
ND
ND
ND ND
ND
ND
ND ND
ND
ND
ND ND
ND
ND
ND 0.252
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010 <0.010
(mg/1)
Day 3
0.058
0.007
0.024
0.004
ND
0.001
ND
ND
ND
0.096
ND
0.051
0.082
0.003
0.026
0.011
ND
ND
**
ND
ND
0.015
ND
0.005
ND
0.001
0.001
0.972
ND
0.346
<0.010
<0.010

Day 4
0.057
0.010
0.023
0.004
ND
ND
0.015
ND
0.007
.0.139
ND
0.037
0.101
0.005
0.030
0.024
ND
0.007
ND
0.002
ND
0.020
ND
0.004
ND
0.001
0.001
1 .250
0,018
0.391
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010

-------
                                                      Table V-273 (Continued)

                                          WASTEWATER TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA - PLANT I
           O
           u>
           OJ
            Pollutant



 Toxic  Pollutants (Continued)

 115.  -arsenic • -




 117.   beryl 1iurn




 118.   cadmium



 119.  chromium  (total)




 120.  copper




121.  cyanide (total)




122.  lead
	1 2.3 .  _ mercury:	
                124.  nickel
                .125.  'selenium
                                                         Stream
                                                          Code -
Concentrations (mg/1)
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
0.200
0.200
0.200
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
~<0 ."01562
<0.0002
; <0.0002
<0.050
'<0.050
<0.050
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010

<0.010 <0.010
<0.005

<0.005 <0.005
0.050

0.120 0.080
<0.020

<0.020 <0.020
, 0.700

1.70 0.750
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02 <0.02
0.050

0.200 0.150
<0.0002
<0.0002 <0.0002
0.050

0.200 0.050
<0.010

<0.010 <0. 010
<0.010
6.030
0.020
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
0.020
<0.020
0.020
<0.020
0.040
<0.020
0.450
1.10
0.450
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
0. 050
0.300
0. 100
<0.0002 . '•'.
<0.0002
<0.0002 ,
<0.050
0. 100
<0.050 •...-•;••
<0.010
<0.010 -. '
•<0.010

-------
                                         Table  V-273  (Continued)


                             WASTEWATER TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA  -  PLANT  I
                Pollutant


     Toxic Pollutants (Continued)



     126.   si 1ver




     127.   thai 1ium




     128.   zinc




     N o nconventional Pollutants
H
°   Acidity
U>
     Al kalini ty
     Aluminum
Stream
Code
1-1 1
1-12
1-13
1-1 1
1-12
1-13
1-1 1
1-12
1-13
1-1 1
1-12
1-13
1-1 1
1-12
1-13
1-1 1
1-12
1-13
Samp 1 a
Type
4
3
4
4
3
4
4
3
4
4
3
4
4
3
4
, 4
3
4
Concentrations
Source Day 2
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010 0.110
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010 <0.010
0.040
0.040
0.040 1.42
<1
<1
<1 <1
40
40
40 32
<0. 100
<0.100
<0.100 0.400
(mg/1)
Day 3
0.020

<0.010
<0.010

<0.010
0.140

0.340
<1

<1
44

59
<0.100

0.200

Day 4
0.060
0.030
0.030
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
0.320
0.620
0.320
<1
140
<1
39
<1
70
<0. 100
0.100
0.200

-------
            Table V-273  (Continued)




WASTEWATER TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA - PLANT  I
' - D ,, . , ' Stream Sample'/ " Concentrations^ (mq/1
Pollutant Cnrip T 	 " 	 	 - 	 	 	 	 — ^^
Nonconventional Pol lutants (Continued)
Ammbma Nitrogen 1-11
1-12
1-13
Bar i um 1-11
1-12
1-13
Boron 1-11
1-12
1-13
Ca 1 ci um 1-11
o l~^l
OJ J~13
(Jl
Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) 1-11
1-12
1-13
Chi oride 1-1 \
1-12
1-13
Cobalt I-n
1-12
1-13
F 1 uoride 1-11
1-12
1-13
Iron 1-11
	 _ . -.- : - - : -1-12-;,
1-13
Magnesium - 1-11
1-12
1-13
Manganese 1-1 i
1-12
1-13
4
3
4
4
3
4
4
3
4
4
3
4
4
3
4
4
3
4
4
3
4
4
3
4
4
: 3 - : •
4
4
3
4
4 •
3
4
)
i ype source uay z Day 3 Day 4
0.06
0.06
0.06
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0. 100
<0. 100
<0. 100
13.8
13.8
13.8
150
150
150
30
30
30
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
0.32
0.32
0.32
0. 100
0.100
0.100
2.70
2.70
2.70
0.100
0. 100
' 0. 100
0.06

1.1 0.05
<0.050

<0.050 <0.050
1 .50

0.170 1.70
11.8

15.1 12.6
1,800

180 1,500
26

<1 27
<0.050

	 
-------
            Table V-273 (Continued)



WASTEWATER TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA - PLANT I
Stream
Pollutant Code
Nonconventional Pollutants (Continued)
Molybdenum 1-1 1
1-12
1-13
Phenol ics 1-1 1
1 — 12
1-13
Phosphate 1-11
1-12
1-13

i_i Sodium 1-1 1
T 1 1
O 1-12
W I - 1 3
a\
Sulfate 1-11
T 1O
1 I £.
1-13

Tin 1-11
11 O
1 ^
1-13
Titanium 1-1 1
1-12
1-13
tal Dissolved Solids (TDS) 1-11
1-12
1-13
Total Organic Carbon (TOC) 1-11
T _ 1 O
i 1 £.
1-13
Total Solids (TS) 1-11
11 *7
— 1 £.
1-13

4
3
4
1
1
1
4
3
4

3
4


3
4

3
4
4
3
4
4
3
4
4
3
4
4
3
4
Sample Concentrations (mg/1)
Type Source Day

<0.050
<0.050
<0.050 <0.050
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005 <0.005
2.7
2.7
2.7 30
28.0
28.0
28.0 68.3

740
740
740 460
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050 <0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050 <0.050
850
850
850 300
63
63
63 20
1 1 ,500
11 ,500
11,500 500
_2 Day

<0.050
<0.050
0.25
<0.005
<0.005
13
17
34.9

84.8

480

390
<0.050

<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
850
440
36
17
900
450
_3 Day 4

<0.050
<0.050
<0.050

-------
                                    Table V-273 (Continued)
Stream
Pol lutant Code
Nonconventi onal Pollutants (Continued)

Vanadi um 1-11
1-12
1-13
Yttrium 1-11
1-12
1-13
Conventional Pollutants
01 1 and Grease 1-1 1
- 1-12
. 1-13
H1
O Total Suspended Solids (TSS) 1-11
W 1-12
-J 1-13
pH "(Standard Units) 1-11
1-12
1-13
1. The following toxic pollutants were not
31-43, 45-64, 67-84, and 88.
Sampl e -
Type


4
3
4
4
3
4

1
1
1

4
3
4
4
3
4
detected


Source


<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050

<,
<1
<1

300
300
300
6.10
6. 10
6. 10
at this

Concentrations (mg/1)
Day 2 Day 3


<0.050

<0.050 <0.050
<0.050

<0.050 <0.050

59
66
3 49

48

200 <1
6. 10

6.10 6.80
plant: 1-10, 12, 13,


Pay 4


<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050

<^
<1
<1

16
16
4
6.20
2.80
8.40
15-28,
. 	 	 	
2.   No analyses were performed on the following toxic pollutants:   89-113,  116,  and 129.
**Present,  but not quantifiable.

-------
                  Table V-274
WASTEWATER TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA - PLANT J
Pol lutant
Toxic Pol lutants
114. antimony
115. arsenic
117. bery 1 1 i urn
118. cadmium
119. chromium (total)
120. copper
121. cyanide (total )
122. lead
H1
O 123. mercury
U)
00 124. nickel
1 25 . Se 1 eni urn
126. silver
127 . thai 1 ium
128. zinc
Nonconvent i onal Pollutants
Acidity
Alkal ini ty
A 1 uminum
Ammonia Nitrogen
Bar i um
Boron
Calcium
Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD)
Stream
Code
J-7
J-7
J-7
J-7
J-7
J-7
J-7
J-7
J-7
J-7
J-7
J-7
J-7
J-7
J-7
J-7
J-7
J-7
J-7
J-7
J-7
J-7
Samole Concentrations (mg/1)
Type Source Da;
1 <0.010
1 <0.010
1 <0.005
1 <0.020
1 <0.020
1 <0.050
1 <0.02
1 <0.050
1 <0.0002
1 <0.050
1 <0.010
1 <0.010
1 <0.010
1 0.080
1 <1
1 13
1 0.300
1 0.16
1 0.050
1 <0.100
1 10.4
1 70
/ i Day 2 Day 3
<0 . 0 1 0
<0.010
<0.005
<0.020
<0.020
0.950
<0.02
0.200
<0.0002
<0.050
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
0. 100
<1
44
0.300
0.40
0.050
^0. 100
9.30
740

-------
            Table V-274 (Continued)




WASTEWATER TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA - PLANT J
	 • ; Pol 1 Ufa n't 	
Stream Sample
Code 	 Type
Concentrations (mg/1)
Source
Day 1 Day 2 ' "Day 3 	 . . -.
Nonconvent ional Pollutants (Continued)
Chloride
Cobalt
Fluoride
Iron
Magnesium
, Manganese
Mol ybdenum
i— i
Q Phenol ics
\Q Phosphate
- - - Sodium - . ...... _ .
Sulfate
Tin
Ti tani um
Total Dissolved Solids (TDS)
: Total Organic Carbon (TOO
Total Solids (TS)
: Vanadi um
Yt t ri um
J-7 . 1
J-7 1
J-7 1
J-7 1
J-7 1
J-7 1
J-7 1 .
J-7 1
J-7 1
J-7 	 1
J-7 1
J-7 1
J-7 1
J-7 1
J-7 ; 1
J-7 r 1
• . J-7 : 1
J-7 ' 1
'<,
<0
1
0
.1
0
<0
<0
<0
1 11
90
<0
<0
76
3
125

-------
                                        Table V-274 (Continued)


                            WASTEWATER TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA - PLANT J
                Pol lutarit



     Conventional Pollutants


     Oi1  and Grease


     Total Suspended Solids (TSS)


     pH (standard units)
                                            Stream
                                             Code
J-7


J-7


J-7
                                                                    Concentrations (mg/I)
Source
<1
42
2.71
Day 1 Day 2
200
500
7.90
Day 3



o
£»
O
     1   No analyses were performed on the following toxic pollutants:  2-4, 6, 7,  10,  11

         13-17, 19, 23, 29, 30, 32, 33, 38, 44-51, 85-113, 116, and  129.


     2.  The following toxic pollutants were not detected at  this plant:   1, 5, 8,  9,  12,

         18, 20-22, 24-28, 31, 34-37, 39-43, and 52-84.

-------
                   Table V-275




WASTEWATER-TREATMENT-PERFORMANCE-DATA~—  PLANT-M
Stream
Pol 1 utant Code
Toxi c Pol 1 utants
11. aery 1 oni t ri 1 e M-14
M-15
M-16
M-17
M-18
M-19
14. 1 , 1 ,2-trichl oroethane M-14
M-15
M-16
M-17
M-18
M-19
23. chloroform M-14
M-15
• M-16
M-17
- - - M-18
M-1'9
26. 1 ,3-di chl orobenzene M-14
M-15
M-16
M-17
M-18
_ .. 	 ._ .._._. 	 	 .- 	 	 .. _. . ,M=-,19--
44. methylene chloride M-14
'M-15
M-16
M-17
M-18
••---- • • ^ M-19
55. naphthalene . M-14
M-15
M-16
M-17
M-18
M-19 ,
Sampl e

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
;1
1
1
1
3
3
1
1
f 1
1
1
1
. 1
V"1 "~
1
1
' 3
3
1
1
                                          Concentrations  (ing/I)
Source
0.01 1
0.01 1
0.01 1
0.01 1
0.011
0.01 1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.016
0.016
0.016
0.016
0.016
0.016
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
	 ND —
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.002
: 0.002
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Day 1
	 -

0.010
0.011
0.016
0.011


ND
0.001
0.001
ND


ND
ND
ND
ND


0.001
ND
ND
	 ND--—- -.

'
0.003
0.003
0.003
"0'. 003"


ND
ND
ND
ND
Day 2
0.008

0.008
0.010
0.010
0.009
ND

ND
ND
0.001
. ND
0.005

ND
ND
ND
ND
ND

ND
ND
ND
.— ND 	
?0.002

0.003
0.003
0.003
"0.002
ND

ND
ND
ND
ND
Day 3
-, , ._.,
0.017
0.015
0.013
0.019
0.018

ND
ND
ND
ND
ND

0.005
ND
ND
"ND
ND

ND
ND
NO
ND
	 NO- 	 	

0.004;'
0.002:
0.001
0 . 00-3
~ 0.005

ND
ND
0 . 003
ND
ND

-------
                                         Table V-275  (Continued)

                             WASTEWATER TREATMENT  PERFORMANCE DATA  -  PLANT M
      Pollutant

      Toxic Pollutants  (Continued)
                                       Stream
                                        Code
                                                                    Concentrations (mg/1)
       66.   bis(2-ethy)hexyl)  phthalate
        86.   toluene
O
*>
to
       114.   antimony
       115.   arseni c
       117.   beryl 1iurn
       118.   cadmi urn
M-14
M-15
M-16
M-17
M-18
M-19

M-14
M-15
M-16
M-17
M-18
M-19

M-14
M-15
M-16
M-17
M-18
M-19

M-14
M-15
M-16
M-17
M-18
M-19

M-14
M-15
M-16
M-17
M-18
.M-19

M-14
M-15
M-16
M-17
M-18
M-19
Source Da
1
1
3
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
1
1
1
1
3
3
1
1
1
1
3
3
1
1
1
1
3
3
1
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.020
<0.020
"<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
y 1 Day 2


ND
ND
ND
ND


ND
ND
ND
ND


<0.010
<0.010
0.040
<0. 100


<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.020


<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.050


0.300
0.080
<0.020
<0.200
ND

0.002
ND
ND
ND
ND

ND
ND
ND
ND
0.010

<0.010
<0.010
0.270
<0.200
<0.010

0.050
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.005

<0.010
<0.005
<0.200
<0.050
0.060

1 .80
0.020
<0.040
<0.200
Day 3

ND
0.005
0.001
ND
ND

ND
ND
ND
0.001
0.003

<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.050

<0.010
0.080
0.020
<0.010
<0.020

<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.010

0.020
2.10
0.020
<0.020
<0.050

-------
                                         Table V-275 (Conti-nued)

                             WASTEWATER TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA - PLANT M
     Pol lutant     -   .-..._

     Tox i c Pol 1utants (Continued)


     119.  chromium  (total)
Stream
 Co'de
                      Source
                                                                   Concentrations  (mg/1)
     1 20.   copper
        M-14
        M-15
        M-16
        M-17
        M-1B
        M-19

        M-14
        M-15
        M-16
        M-17
        M-18
        M-19
O
^
U)
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020


0.020
<0.020
0.060
<0.200
0.220

0.200
0.020
0.240
<0.200

0.220
0. 240
0.040
0.040
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050.


1 .20
0. 200
<0.050
<0.500
9.25

25.6
0.300
0.300
<0.500

<0.050
29.0
0.400
0.050
0. 100

-------
                                         Table V-275 (Continued)

                             WASTEWATER TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA - PLANT M
      Pollutant

      Tox1c Po11utants (Continued)

      121.   cyanide (total)
      122.  lead
      123.  mercury
O
>&«
£>•
      124.   nickel
      125.   seleni um
      126.   silver
                                      Stream
                                       Code
M-14
M-15
M-16
M-17
M-18
M-19

M-14
M-15
M-16
M-17
M-18
M-19

M-14
M-15
M-16
M-17
M-18
M-19

M-14
M-15
M-16
M-17
M-18
M-19

M-14
M-15
M-16
M-17
M-18
M-19

M-14
M-15
M-16
M-17
M-18
M-19
                            Concentrations (ing/1)
1
1
1
1
1
1

1
1
3
3
1
1

1
1
3
3
1
1

1
1
3
3
1
1

1
1
3
3
1
1

1
1
3
3
1
1
Source
<0.02
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
.02
.02
.02
.02
.02
.050
.050
.050
.050
.050
.050
.0002
.0002
.0002
.0002
.0002
.0002
.050
.050
.050
.050
.050
.050
.010
.010
.010
.010
.010
.010
.010
.010
.010
.010
.010
.010
Day 1

<0
<0
<0
<0


<0
<0
<0
<0


<0
<0
0
0


28
2
0
<0


<0
<0
<0
<0


0
0
<0
0

.02
.02
.02
.02


. 100
.050
.500
.500


.0002
.0002
.0008
.0032


.4
.80
.750
.500


.010
.010
.010
.010


.040
.040
.010
.040
Day 2
<0.02

<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
<5.00

<1 .00
<0.500
0.200
<0.500
<0.0002

0.0004
<0.0002
0.0018
<0.0002
3.95

585
5. 10
8.20
<0.500
<0.010

<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.040
0. 160

0.080
0.060
0. 170
0.030
Day 3
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0

<5
<1
<0
<0
<0

<0
0
<0
0
0

<0
693
5
0
<0

<0
<0
<0
<0
<0

<0
0
0
<0
0
.02
.02
.02
.02
.02

.00
.00
.500
.500
. 100

.0002
.0004
.0002
.0002
.0002

.050

.85
.900
.200

.010
.010
.010
.010
.020

.010
.090
. 160
.010
.030

-------
                                   Table V-275  (Continued)

                      ..WASTEWATER. TREATMENT  PERFORMANCE ...DATA __-_ ..PLANT M
Pol 1utant
Toxic Pollutants  (Continued)
                                Stream
                                 Code
Source
       Concentrations  (ing/1)
           (i.iv 1     Day  2
127. thai Hum M-14
M-15
M-16
M-17
M-18
M-19
128. zinc M-14
M-15
M-16
M-17
M-18
M-19
i •
Q Nonconvent ional Pollutants
(jl Acidity M-14
. . . . . .. ... . ._., ... . . .M-.15 .
M-16
M-17
M-18
M-19
Alkalinity . M-14
M-15
M-16 ,
- f M— 1-7 >
: ; - M-18
;! ''M-19.
A 1 uminum M-14
'_ ' .M-15
- . - . .. . . ,,..... 	 _ JL '..,.. -M--T6 - - 	
; ." :. M-17
M-18
M-19
Ammonia Nitrogen M-14
M-15
-M-16
M-17
M-18
M-19
1
1
3
3
1
1
1
1
3
3
1
1


1
1
3
3
1
1
1
1
3
3".
1
1
1
1
-.- 	 -3- 	
3
. 1
1 '
1
1
3
3
1
1
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
0
0
0
0
.: 0
0


"<1
< 1
<1
<1
<1

-------
                                          Table V-275 (Continued)

                              WASTEWATER TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA - PLANT M
       Pollutant
                                Stream
                                 Code
                                                                    Concentrat i ons (nig/1)
       Nonconvent i onal  Pol 1utants (Continued)
       Barium
       Boron
H
O
a\
Calcium
       Chemical  Oxygen  Demand  (COD)
       Chioride
      Cobalt
M-14
M-15
M-16
M-17
M-18
M-19

M-14
M-15
M-16
M-17
M-18
M-19

M-14
M-15
M-16
M-17
M-18
M-19

M-14
M-15
M-16
M-17
M-18
M-19

M-14
M-15
M-16
M-17
M-18
M-19

M-14
M-15
M-16
M-17
M-18
M-19 •
Source
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
36
36
36
36
36
36
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
10
10
10
10
10
10
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
.050
.050
.050
.050
.050
.050
. 100
. 100
. 100
. 100
. 100
. 100
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5












.050
.050
.050
.050
.050
.050
D_ay 1


<0
<0
<0
<0


2
. 1
1
<1


37
26
30
390


62
10
20
98


187
130
14
140


<0
<0
<0
<0


.05.0
.050
.050
.500


.10
.60
.60
.00


.3
.6
. I















.050
.050
.050
.500
Day 2
0

0

-------
            Table V-275  (Continued)

WASTEWATEFTTRFATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA ~-  PLANTr MT
Stream
Pol lutant Code
Nonconvent i onal Pollutants (Continued)
Fluoride . M- 1 4
M-15
M-16
M-17
M-18
M-19
Iron M-14
M-15
M-16
M-17
M-18
M-19
*•? Magnesium M-14
^ M-15
M-16
	 	 ' -. -- M-17
M-18
M-19
Manganese M-14
M-15
M-16 "
M-17
- — -- - 	 — 	 : • .-•--- — •- 	 — - 	 	 -M V8 • ••
- - .' , M-19
! Molybdenum M-14
:.M-15
: : . M-16
.I ..;: 	 	 ..., . . , 	 M-17. ..
M-18
M-19
Phenol i cs M-14
M-15
M-16
M-17
M- 1 8
M-19
Sampl e
Type

1
1
3
3
1
1
1
1
3
3
1
1
1
1
3
3
1
1
1
1
3
3
— - -i — - ••
1
1
1
3
. 3 _
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
                                      Concentrations  (tng/1)
                               Source
                               0.85
                               0.85
                               0.85
                               0.85
                               0.85
                               0.85

                              <0.050
                              <0.050
                              <0.050
                              <0.050
                              <0.050
                              <0.050
                              1 1
                              1 1
                              1 1
                              1 1
                              1 1
                              1 1 .3

                              <0.050
                              <0.050
                              <0.050
                              <0.050
                              <0.050

                              <0.050
                              <0.050
                              <0.050
                              .
-------
r
                                                      Table V-275 (Continued)

                                          WASTEWATER TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA - PLANT M
                   Pollutant
                                                   Stream
                                                    Code
                   Nonconventipnal Pollutants  (Continued)
                   Phosphate
                   Sodium
             O
             •&.
             00
                   Sulfate
                   Tin

                   Ti tani um
                   Total  Dissolved  Solids  (TDS)
M-14
M-15
M-16
M-17
M-18
M-19

M-14
M-15
M-16
M-17
M-18
M-19

M-14
M-15
M-16
M-17
M-18
M-19

M-14
M-15
M-16
M-17
M-18
M-19

M-14
M-15
M-16
M-17
M-18
M-19

M-14
M-15
M-16
M-17
M-18
M-19
          Sample
           Type
1
1
3
3
1
1

1
1
3
3
1
1

1
1
3
3
1
1

1
1
3
3
1
1

1
1
3
3
1
1

1
1
3
3
1
1
                                                                                Concentrations  (mg/1)
Source
<4
<4
<4
<4
<4
<4
5
5
5
5
5
5
43
43
43
43
43
43
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
270
270
270
270
270
270





.20
.20
.20
.20
.20
.20






.050
.050
.050
.050
.050
.050
.050
.050
.050
.050
.050
.050






Da'

24
17
17
17


178
441
61 .
5,570


100
75
230
8,700


<0 .

-------
            Table V-275 (Continued)




WASTEWATER TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA - PLANT M
	 . ... 	 	 	 . -. . . .. . . Stream
Pollutant Code
Nonconvent 1 onal Pollutants (Continued)
•"• - 1 - - -- Total Organic Carbon (TOC) M-14
M-15
M-16
M-17
M-18
M-19
Total Solids (TS) M-14 :
M-15"
M-16
M-17
M-18
M-19
Vanadium : M-14
H - ' M-15
O M-16
*J M-17
W> . : M-18
---------- M-19
Yttrium M-14
M-15
. M-16
M-17
M-18
M-19
. ' . Conventional Pollutants. -- ""
' - . • Oil and Grease :i F; M-14
; ' ' M- 1 5
'"'->'. : M-1,6
: . , M-17
", '. "' 	 : 	 " M-18
: M-19
Total Suspended Solids (TSS) :,M-14
- M-15
' M-16
M-17
M-18
M- 1 9 -:
Sampl
Type

1
1
3
3
1
1
1
1
3
3
1
1
1
1
3
3
1
1
1
1
3
3
1
1

.• 1
1
1
. . 1 .
1
1
1
1
3
3
1
1
e
	 Concentrations
_ Source Dav 1

"~
-------
                                        Table V-275 (Continued)


                            WASTEWATER TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA - PLANT M
     Pollutant


     Conventional Pol 1utants (Continued)
     pH (Standard Units)
Stream
Code
led)
M-14
M-15
M-16
M-17
M-18
M-19
Samp 1 e
Type
1
1
3
3
1
1
Concentrations
Source
7
7
7
7
7
7
.30
.30
.30
.30
.30
.30
Da


7.
1 1 .
1 .
1 1 .
y 1


90
50
90
60
(mg/1)
Day 2
6

10
1 1
1
9
.50

.JO
.70
.60
.90

Da

7.
10.
1 1 .
2.
1 1 .

y 3

10
10
70
80
40
o
Ul
o
     1.  The following toxic pollutants were not detected at this plant:  1-10, 12, 13, 15-22,

         24, 25, 27-43, 45-54, 56-65, 67-85, 87, and 88.


     2.  No analyses were performed on the following toxic pollutants:  89-113, 116, and 129.

-------
                                                 Table V-276
H
O
cn
WASTEWATER TREATMENT
Stream
Pol 1 utant Code
Toxic Pollutants - • - -•- - . ~ -
11. 1 , 1 , 1-trichloroethane Q-11
Q-14
- Q-15
Q-16
Q-17
22. p-ch 1 oro-m-cresol Q-11
Q-14
Q-15
: Q-16
Q-17
30. 1 , 2-trans-di chl oroethy 1 ene Q-11
Q-14
Q-15
Q-16
Q-17
44. methylene chloride Q-11
Q-14
Q-15
Q-16
Q-17
65. phenol Q-11
Q-14
« Q-15
Q-16
r - • Q-17
66. bis(2-ethy Ihexyl ) phthalate Q-11
; Q-14
f - •: ' - i : - Q-15
Q-16
Q-17
85. tetrach 1 oroethy 1 ene Q-11
Q-14
Q-15
: Q-16
Q- 1 7
PERFORMANCE
Sampl e
Type

1
1
1
1
1
3
4
4
4
1
1
1
1
n
i
1
i
i
i
i
3
4
4
4
1
3
4
4
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
DATA - PLANT Q
Concentrations (mg/1)
Source

0.018
0.018
0.018
0.018
0.018
0.011
0.01 1
0.01 1
0.011
0.011
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.002
ND
ND . . ...
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND •
Day 1 Day 2

ND
0.008 **
0.012 0.007
0.009
ND
ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND
ND
ND
ND ND
ND ND
0.023
ND
0.004
0.016 0.014
0.004 0.005
0.004
0.004
0.001
... ND.- ._ ND
0.016 "0.0061 " -
0.003 '-.
ND _": '
ND , - !•*
ND 0.003;
ND 	 ~ ND "J;
ND -
ND ! "-
ND
ND 3.660' =
0.399 - 0.555 :
0.031
ND ;
Day 3
	 	 	
0.008
* *
0.006
0.007
0.009
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.014
ND
0.013
0.019
0. 122
0.007
0.004
ND
_NO- 	 - 	 - 	 -- - - 	 - 	 	 - -
0.009 -
0.005
ND : . . .
ND
ND . ."
0.002 "" "" ' " "" ":
ND ' .
ND
ND
5.770
0.460
0.131
ND

-------
                                           Table  V-276  (Continued)

                             WASTEWATER  TREATMENT  PERFORMANCE DATA  - PLANT  Q
                                       Stream
                                        Code
       Pollutant

       Toxic  Pollutants  (Continued)


        87.   trichloroethy1ene
        88.   vinyl  chloride  (chloroethy1ene)
Q-11
Q-14
Q-15
Q-16
Q-17
Q-1-1
Q-14
Q-15
Q-16
Q-17
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
                                                                    Concentrations  (mg/1)

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Source Day
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
_L Day
ND
ND
ND
0.001
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.002
ND
2

ND
ND



ND
ND


Day 3
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
H
O
U1

-------
Table V-276 (Continued)
WASTEWATER TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA
Stream
Pol lutant Code
-To xie Po-1 1 utants (Continued) - - •-- •
114. antimony Q-11
Q-14
Q-15
Q-16
Q-17
115. arsenic Q-11
Q-14
Q-15
Q-16
Q-17
: H 117. beryllium Q-11
O Q~ ! 4 . .
Ul Q-15
OJ " Q-16
- 0-17
\u{ I 1
118. cadmium Q-11
Q-14
'- Q-15
Q-16
Q-17
.._ - J 1_9_,_ chromium (_total) Or 1 1
Q-12' '
• - ••'-."' Q-is
: '• ' .: . Q-14
: "• Q-15
Q-16
. :• . Q-17
119. chromium (hexavalent) 'Q-12 .
Q-13
120. ' copper Q-11
Q-14
Q-15
Q-16
Q-17 -
Sample
Type

3
4
4
4
1
3
4
4
4
1
3
4
4
4
_ . . i 	
3
4
4
4
1
3
3
3
4
4
4
1
3
3
3
4
4
. 4
1

Source

<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0 . 005
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
- PLANT Q
Concentrations (mg/1
Day 1 Day 2


<0.010
<0.010 <0..010
<0.200 <0.200
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010 <0.010
<0.050
<0.010
<(l.(J10-
<0.005
<0.050 <0.050
<0.005 <0.005
<0.005.
<0 005
<0.020
<0.200 £0.200
<0.020 <0.020
<0.020
<0.020
0.020
1 ,800 :•-'..;
1 ,900 ; ' :
1 ,720 1 ,590
0.080 0-.il 00
0.040 ,
0.020 ,
1,700 :
o.6o :
<0.050
0.500 1.00 ,
<0.050 <0'.050
<0.050 -;
<0.050

) 	 "
Day 3


^0.010
<0 .010
<0.100
<0.050
<0.010
<0.010
<0: 010
<0.080
•< 0.010
<0 . 0 1 U
<0.005
<0.050
<0.005
<0.005
-
-------
                                           Table V-276 (Continued)

                              WASTEWATER TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA - PLANT Q
O
Ul
       Pollutant
       Toxic Pollutants (Continued)
       121.   cyanide (total)
       122.  lead
       123.  mercury
       124.  nickel
       125.   selenium
       126.   si 1ver
       127.   thai 1ium
                                       Stream
                                        Code
Q-11
Q-14
Q-15
Q-16
Q-17
Q-11
Q-14
Q-15
Q-16
Q-17
Q-11
Q-14
Q-15
Q-16
Q-17
Q-11
Q-14
Q-15
Q-16
Q-17
Q-1 1
Q-14
Q-15
Q-16
Q-17
Q-11
Q-14
Q-15
Q-16
Q-17.
Q-11
Q-14
Q-15
Q-16
Q-17
1
1
1
1
1
3
4
4
4
1
3
4
4
4
1
3
4
4
4
1
3
4
4
4
1
3
4
4
4
1
3
4
4
4
1
Concentrations (tng/1)
Source










0.
0.
0.
0.
0.







0 .

0.
0.
0.

0 .






02
02
02
02
02
050
050
050
050
050
0002
0002
0002
0002
0002
050
050
050
050
050
010
010
010
0.10
010
010
oib
010
010
010
010
010
010
010
010
Da

<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<5.
0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.

-------
                                    Table V-276 (Continued)

                       WASTEWATER TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA - PLANT Q
Pol 1utant
To'x i c Pollutants (Continued)
                                Stream
                                 Code
Concentrations (mg/1)
                                                      Source
128. zinc Q-11
Q-14
Q-15
Q-16
Q-17
Nonconvent i ona 1 Pollutants
Acidi ty Q-11
Q-14
Q-15
Q-16
H Q-17
0
H!l Al kal ini ty Q-11
Q-14
-----. 	 — - 	 Q-15
Q-16
Q-17
Al uminum Q-11
Q-14
Q-15
Q-16
Q— i 7
Ammonia Nitrogen. Q-11
, - ' : Q-14
Q-15
Q-16
, 	 	 ; . . .:..;.. :. 	 Q-17 .
: Barium Q-11
-. • .Q-14
Q-15
: , Q-16
Q-17
Boron Q-11
Q-14
Q-15
- Q-16
: Q-17
3
4
4
4
1

3
4
4
4
1

3
4
4
4
1
3
4
4
.4
*,
3
4
4
4
1
3
• 4
4
4
1
3
4
4
4
.1
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.


-------
                                          Table V-276 (Continued)

                             WASTEWATER TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA - PLANT Q
                                      Stream
      Pollutant                        Code

      Nonconventional  Pollutants  (Continued)
                                                                   Concentrations  (mg/1)
      Calcium
H
O
       Chemical  Oxygen Demand  (COD)
       Chloride
       Cobalt
       Fluoride
       I ron
       Magnesium
 Q-11
 Q-14
 Q-15
 Q-16
 Q-17

 Q-11
 Q-14
 Q-15
 Q-16
 Q-17

 Q-11
 Q-14
 Q-15
 Q-16
 Q-17

 Q-11
' Q-14
 Q-15
 Q-16
 Q-17

 Q-11
 Q-14
 Q-15
 Q-16
 Q-17

 Q-1 1
 Q-14
 Q-15
 Q-16
 Q-17

 Q-11
 Q-14
 Q-15
 Q-16
 Q-17
3
4
4
4
1

3
4
4
4
1

3
4
4
4
 1

3
4
4
4
 1

 3
 4
 4
 4
 1

 3
 4
 4
 4
 1

 3
 4
 4
 4
 1
Source
3.70
3.70
3.70
3.70
3.70
500
500
500
500
500
7
7
7
7
7
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
0.3
0.3
0.3
0 . 3
0.3
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
0.900
0.900
0.900
0.900
0.900
Day 1
5.00
15.0
191
28.3
5.00
180
15,000 22
13,000 15
3,500
33
<1
<1
80
31
<1
<0.050
<0.500
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
0.5
8.9
2.6
2.7
1 .2
0.500
30.5
0.250
0.500
0.600
16.0
600
<0.100
28.4
1 .00
Day ? Day 3
5.00
14.0 13.0
249 199
47.2
5.60
780
,000 23,000
,000 17,000
770
<10
<1
<1 <1
76 80
44
<1
<0.050
<0.500 <0.500
<0.050 <0.050
<0.050
<0.050
1 .9
8.1 9.2
2.7 3.4
1 . 1
0.29
0 . -1 00
30.5 30.5
0.400 0.350
0.300
0.750
42.4
487 437
<0. 100 ' <0. 100
27.8
1.10

-------
                Table V-276 (Continued)




JWASXEWATER.. TREATMENT. J>ERFORMANCEJ3ATA...-_.PLANT.:,Q	
• • • - Stream •
Pol lutant Code
Nonconvent i onal Pollutants (Continued)
Manganese Q-1 1.
Q-14
Q-1 5
Q-16
Q-17
Mol ybdenum Q-1 1
Q-14
Q-1 5
Q-16
Q-17
Phenol ics Q-11
:. Q-14
H Q~15
C5
• en Q-17
. ;. _ Phosphate .. . . . . " _ Q-11 . .
Q-14
Q-1 5
Q-16
Q-17
Sodi urn Q- 1 1
Q-14
Q-1 5
, . , ! ' - . , : . Q-16
Q-17
Sulfate = ; : Q-11
. Q-14
L Q-1 5
--- "- \ ' •'- ' ' -'- ••••- - • 	 : 	 Q-16 '."-
•; Q-17
: Tin ; Q-11
Q-14 '
Q-15
Q-16
Q-17
Sampl e
Type

3
4
4
4
1
3
4
4
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
3.
4
4
4
1
3
4
4
4
1
3
4
4
' 4
1
3
4
4
4
1
" " •• Concent rat i ons' (mg/ 10 "" 	 ' "
Source

<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
. 
-------
                                          Table V-276 (Continued)

                             WASTEWATER TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA - PLANT Q
      Pol lutajrt
                                      Stream
                                       Code
                                                                   Concentrations  (mg/1)
      Nonconventional Pollutants CContinued)
H
O
LT
CO
      Ti tani urn
      Total Dissolved Solids (IDS)
      Total Organic Carbon (TOC)
      Total Solids  (TS)
      Vanadi urn
      Yttrium
      Conventional  Pollutants
      Oi1 and  Grease
Q-11
Q-14
Q-15
Q-16
Q-17

Q-11
Q-14
Q-15
Q-16
Q-17

Q-11
Q-14
Q-15
Q-16
Q-17

Q-11
Q-14
Q-15
Q-16
Q-17

Q-11
Q-14
Q-15
Q-16
Q-17

Q-11
Q-14
Q-15
Q-16
Q-17
 Q-11
 Q-14
 Q-15
 Q-16
 Q-17
3
4
4
4
1

3
4
4
4
1

3
4
4
4
1

3
4
4
4
1

3
4
4
4
 1

3
4
4
4
 1
Source Day 1
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
260
260
260
260
260
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.2
200
200
200
200
200
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<0.050
<0.500
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
380
8,100 7
13,000 12
2,700
230
69
2,500 2
1,300 1
310
<1
330
9,000 8
13,000 12
2,800
140
<0.050
<5.00
<0.050
<0 050

-------
H
O
U1
vo
                                            Table V-276 (Continued)


                               WASTEWATER TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA - PLANT Q
       Pol 1utant
                                        Stream
                                         Code
       Conventional PoIIutants  (Continued)

       Total ,,S.ujsLpendejcL.5Q.li-ds  CT.SS)..
       pH (Standard Units)
                                                              Source
                                                              Concentrations  (mg/1)
Q-1 .1 . _ -
Q-14
Q-1 5
Q-1 6
Q-1 7
Q-ll
Q-14
Q-1 5
Q-16
Q-1 7
	 3 - -
.4
4
4
1
3
4
4
4
1
. ... 31
.. 31
31
31
31
7
7.
7.
7.
• 7





.90
.90
.90
.90
.90
- 50
92
150
77
45
6.
4.
5.
7.
7.
_- „„,_




80
40
50
80 L -:
40

70
36



4.40
5.30


- -1-2.
32
2
38
3
7
4
5
- 7
7
=, - -




.30
.40
.30
.30
.80
1. ..  The following toxic pollutants  were  not  detected- at this plant:   1-TO,  12-21,  23-29,
    31-43, 45-64, 67-84, and  86.


2.   No analyses were performed  on the  following toxic pollutants:  89-113,  116,  and 129.


**Present but not quantifiable.                     ,

-------
                                               Taoie v-277

                              WASTEWATER TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA - PLANT R
                   Pollutant
                                               Stream
                                                Code
                                                           	Concentrations (mg/1)
                                                           Source    Day 1    Day "i
o
0>
o
Toxic Pollutants

119.  chromium (total)




124.  nickel




Nonconventional Pol 1utants

Acidity




Fluoride




Iron




Conventional Pol 1utants

Oi1 and Grease
                                         R-1
                                         R-2
                                         R-3
                                         R-4

                                         R-1
                                         R-2
                                         R-3
                                         R-4
R-1
R-2
R-3
R-4

R-1
R-2
R-3
R-4

R-1
R-2
R-3
R-4
                                         R-1
                                         R-2
                                         R-3
                                         R-4
            7
            6
            6
            6

            7
            •6
            6
            6
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01

 0.022
 0.022
 0.022
 0.022
 0.890
 0.340
<0.01
<0.01

35.0
 0.240
<0.02
 0.096
7
6
6
6
7
6
6
6
7
6
6
6
0
0
0
0
0.
0.
0.
0.
1 .
1 .
1 .
1 .




19
19
19
19
6
6
6
6
20
0
0
-
0.23
0.22
0.18
0.26
7.6
0.21
<0.1
0.38
                   <5.0
                   <5.0
                   <5.0
                   <5.0
           <5.0
           <5.0
           <5.0
           <5.0
 0.740
 0.300
<0.01
<0.01

25.0
 0.440
 0.022
 0.10
                                                                                           27
                                                                                            0
                                                                                            0
                                                                                            0.17
                                                                                            0.19
                                                                                            0.18
                                                                                            0.29

                                                                                            6.8
                                                                                            0.28
                                                                                           <0.1
                                                                                            0.36
                    <5.0
                    <5.0
                    <5.0

-------
                             ,	Table V-277 (Continued)	

                              WASTEWATER TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA - PLANT R_
                   Pollutant
        Conventional  Pollutants (Continued)

        Total  Suspended Solids (TSS)



        pH (standard  units)
Stream
 Code
                                                                   Source
                                                                       Concentrations (mg/1)
R-1
R-2
R-3
R-4
R-1
R-2
R-3
R-4
7
6
6
6
1
1
1
1
14
14
14
14
_
-
-
-
55
6.0
6.0
9.0A
4.8
9.8
6.8
7.4
                                            25
                                             7.2
                                             1 .0
                                             7.5

                                             6.0
                                             9.3
O
a\
       A - Average Value.

       1.  No analyses were performed on the following toxic pollutants:  1-118, ' 120-123,
           and 125-129.

-------
I
                                                            Table  V-278



                                          WASTEWATER TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA - PLANT S

Pol lutant
Toxic Pol lutants
115. arsenic
118. cadmium
119. chromium (total)
120. copper
121. cyanide (total)
H
° 122. lead
to
123. mercury
124. nickel
1 28 . zi nc

Nonconvent i onal Pollutants
Aluminum
Cobalt
Fluoride

I ron




S-2
S-4
S-2
S-4
S-2
S-4
S-2
S-4
S-2
S-4

S-2
S-4

S-2
S-4
S-2
S-4
S-2
S-4

S-2
S-4
S-2
S-4
S-2
S-4
S-2
S-4
Stream
Code

2
5
2
5
2
5
2
5
2
5

2
5

2
5
2
5
2
5

2
5
2
5
2
5
2
5
Samp11? Concentrations (mg/1)
Type Source

<0.01
<0.01
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.01
<0.01

<0.1
<0.1

<0.0002
<0.0002
<0.200
<0.200
<0.05
<0.05

<0.2
<0.2
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0. 1
0. 122
0. 122
Day 1 Day 2 Day 3

<0.01
<0.01
<0.05
<0.05
0.582
<0.050
0.236
<0.050
<0.01
<0.01

0.101
<0. 100

<0.0002
<0.0002
2.44
<0.200
0.155
0.058

0.263
<0.200
<0. 100
<0.100
0.16
0.18
244
1.17

-------
                                         Table  V-278  (Continued)

                             WASTEWATER TREATMENT  PERFORMANCE  DATA  - PLANT S
                  Pollutaht "


       Conventional Pol 1utants

       Oi1  and Grease


       Total Suspended  Solids (TSS)


       pH (standard units)
S-2
S-4

S-2
S-4

S-2
S-4
Stream
 Code
                             Concentrations  (mg/1)
                         Source     Day  1     Dav  2
              <0. 1
                           1 .6
                         347
                           5.2

                         8.0-8.2
                         7.5-8.7
O
CT>
U>
       Footnote:
               :   No analyses were performed on the following toxic pollutants:   1 -  114,  116,
                  117,  125~~127,  and 129.

-------
                                       Table  V-279
                     WASTEWATER  TREATMENT  PERFORMANCE  DATA  -  PLANT T
Pol 1 utant
Toxic Pol lutants
119. chromium (total)
120. copper
121. cyanide (total)
122. lead
124. nickel
Nonconventional Pollutants
Acidity
Aluminum
Cobalt
Fluoride
Iron
Conventional Pollutants
Oi 1 and Grease
Total Suspended Solids (TSS)
pH (standard units)
Strej
Code

T-2
T-2
T-2
T-2
T-2

T-2
T-2
T-2
T-2
T-2

T-2
T-2
T-2
jm Samp 1 e
Concentrations (mg/1)
j Type Source Day

6 <0.01
6 0.048
1 <0.01
6 <0.005
6 0.075

6 **
6 0.14
6 <0.01
6 1 .01
6 0.270

1 <0.1;0.4
6 1
6 7.70

0.019
0.300
<0.01
<0.005
0.260

**
0.027
0.310
-
0.320

0.2;<0.1
4
8.2
_L Day

0.023
1 .400
<0.01
<0.005
0.510

**
0.220
0.240
0.87
0.210

1 .4;2.0
6
8.2
2_ Day 3

<0.010
1 .300
<0.01
<0.005
0.340

**
0.072
0.220
0.92
0.220


6
7.83
**Less than detection limit.   Detection limit  not known.
1.  No analyses were performed on the following toxic pollutants:   1-118,  123,  and
    125-129.

-------
Table V-280
WASTEWATER TREATMENT PERFORM/i
Pollutant mn'o T





Toxic Pol lutants
11 .
23.
44.
48.
M
S 114.
Ul
115..
1 17.
.118.
1,1, 1-trichlo-
ethane
chl orof orm
methylene chloride
dichl orobromo-
methane
ant imony
arsenic
beryl 1 ium
cadmium
U-15
U-18
U-15
U-18
U-15
U-18
U-15
U-18
U-15
U-18
U-15
U-18
U-15
U-18
U-15
U-18
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
6
3
6
3
6
3
. 6
ND
ND
0.089
0.089
ND
ND
0.006
0.006
<0.0006
<0.0006
<0.001
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
0.064
0.064
                        oncentrations (me,/,)
                  0.008


                  0.016


                 ND


                 ND


                  0.0067


                 <0.001


                 <0.01


                 0.15
 0.216


<0.001


<0.01


 2.9
               1 .800


               0.097


               0.082


             ND
 0.0016
 0. 151

<0.001
<0.001

<0.01
<0.01

 0.031
 0.79

-------
            Table V-280   (Continued)



WASTEWATER TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA - PLANT U





H
O
a\
a\

Toxic
119.
120.
121 .
122.
123.
124.
125.
Pol lutant


Stream Sample
Code Type
Concentrations (mq/1)
Source
Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
Pol lutants (Continued)
chromium (total )
copper
cyanide (total)
lead
mercury
nickel
sel eni urn
U-15
U-18
U-15
U-18
U-15
U-18
U-15
U-18
U-15
U-18
U-15
U-18
U-15
U-18
3
6
3
6
1
1
3
6
3
6
3
6
3
6
0.033
0.033
0.35
0.35
<0.01
<0.01
0.19
0.19
<0.005
<0.005
0.022
0.022
<0.001
<0.001
0.031
1 . 1
<0.01
0.31
<0.005
0.09
<0.001
0.026
0.059 0.16
0.29
1.7 5.1
<0.01
<0.01 0.034
0.15
0.23 1.3
<0.005
0.021 0.006
0.05
1.2 2.4
<0.001
0.002 0.001

-------
            Table V-280   (Continued)



WASTEWATER TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA - PLANT  U
Pol lutant- .



Toxic
126.
127.
128.
Pol 1 utants
si 1 ver
thai 1 ium
zinc
Nonconventional

H
O
a\
Acidi
Alkal
ty
i ni ty
(Continued)
U-15
	 U-18
U-15
U-19
U-15
U-18
Pol 1 utants
U-15
U-18
U-15
U-18
3
• - 6
3
6
3
6
3
6
3
6
Stream
Code
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
20
20
25
25
Sample Concentrations (mg/1)
Type .Source
.0005
.0005" ' 0.012
.001
.001 0.002
.01
.01 1.7
.0
. 0 < 1 0 . 0
.0
.0 120.0
.Day. 1 Day 2
0.
"• "0.0025 0.
0.0022 0.
0.
0.38 3.
10.
<10.0 30.
24.
380.0 136.
Day 3 . . .
01 1
01 1 • • 	 •• •- 	 " 	 - ••-
001
0027
81
0
0
0
0
0

-------
            Table V-280 (Continued)



WASTEWATER TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA - PLANT U
Pol lutant
Nonconventional Pollutants
Aluminum
Ammonia Nitrogen
Barium
Boron
Calcium
Chemical Oxygen Demand
O

-------
            Table V-280 (Continued)






WASTEWATER TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA - PLANT U
Pol lutant

Nonconvent i ona 1 Pi
Fluoride


Gold
Iron

Magnesium

Manganese

Mol ybdenum
O
to Phosphorus

ol lutants fConti
U-15
. . U-18 -

U-15
U-18
U-15
U-18
U-15
U-18
U-15
U-18
U-15
U-18
U-18
rl°° -sanif
—
i riued)
3
- 6

3
6
3
6
3
6
3
6
3
6
6
v*uuic | VL

1 .4
1.4

<0.25
<0.25
0.23
0.23
2. 1
2.1
<0.02
<0.02
<0.03
<0.03
0.78
Jle Concent rat ions (mq/1)
>e_ Source Day 1 Day 2 Day 3


- .._... 1 -.3
3- ' 7.6 25.0
<0.25
<0-25 <0.25 <0.25

'. « °-25
'•2 1.7 2.3

1-9 2.0 2\9

0.17
0.46 0.12 0.32

<0.03
<0.03 <0.03 <0.03
3-5 3.8 6.5

-------
            Table V-280 (Continued)



WASTEWATER TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA - PLANT U
Pol lutant
Stream
Code
Sample
Type I
Concentrations
Source Day 1
(mg/1)
Day 2

Day 3
Nonconventional Pollutants (Continued)
Sodium
Sulfate
Tin
Titanium
Total Dissolved Solids
(TDS)
O Total Organic Carbon
-J (TOO
O
Total Solids (TS)
U-15
U-18
U-15
U-18
U-15
U-18
U-15
U-18
U-15
U-18
U-18
U-15
U-18
3
6
3
6
3
6
3
6
3
6
6
3
6
7
7
3
3
<0
<0
<0
150
150
132
150
150
.2
.2
.3
.3
.25
.25
.25
.25
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
400
120
<0
<0
2,400
27
2,400
.0
.0
.25
.25
.0
.0
.0
1 ,100
200
<0
<0
8 , 600
9
9,100
.0
.0
.25
.25
.0
.0
.0
8
730
7
150
<0
<0
<0
<0
140
2,900
25
150
3,000
.5
.0
.5
.0
.25
.25
.25
.25
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0

-------
H
O
-J
                                          Table V-280 (Continued)

                              WASTEWATER TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA - PLANT U
Pol lutant
Nbnconventidnal Pollutants
Vanadium
Yttrium
Conventional Pollutants
Oi 1 and Grease
Total Suspended Sol ids
(TSS)
pH (standard units)
"'
„.,
3t ream 	 Samp 1 e
Code Type
(Continued)
U-15
U-18
U-15
U-18
U-15
U-18
U-15
U-18
U-15
U-18
3
6
3
6
1
1
3
6
3
6
<0.02
<0.02
<0.12
<0. 12
24.0
24.0
<1 .0
<1 .0
5
5
                                                                       Concent rat ions '(mgYl)
                                                                   Source
                                                                 <0.02
                                                                 <0.12
                                                                300.0
                                                                 14.0
<0.02


<0. 12




63.0


53.0
 <0.02
 <0.02

 <0. 1 2
 <0. 12
160.0
 <1 .0

  2.0
 20.0

  4
  5
        1.   The following  toxic  pollutants  were  not  detected  at  this  plant:   1-10,  12-22  24-43
            45-47,  and  49-88.
        2.   No  analyses  were  performed  on  the  following  toxic  pollutants:   89-113,  116,  and 129.

-------
r
                                                                         Table V-281

                                                        WASTEWATER TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA - PLANT V

                                                                                      Concentrations (mg/1)
             O
             -J
                   Pollutant
                   Toxic Pollutants

                    22.  p-chloro-m-
                           cresol
                    23.  chloroform
66.  bis(2-ethylhexyl )
       phthalate
                    68.  di-n-butyl
                           phthalate
                    85.  tetrachloro-
                           ethylene
                   114.  antimony
                   115.  arseni c
                   117.  beryllium
                                           Steam
                                           Code
V-10
V-1 1
V-12
V-13

V-10
V-1 1
V-12
V-13

V-10
V-11
V-12
V-13

V-10
V-11
V-12
V-13

V-10
V-1 1
V-12
V-13

V-10
V-11
V-12
V-13

V-10
V-11
V-12
V-13

V-10
V-1 1
V-12
V-13
                                Sample
                                 Type
Source

ND
NO
ND
ND
0. 103
0.103
0.103
0. 103
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
<0.0006
<0.0006
<0.0006
<0.0006
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
0.012
0.012
0.012
0.012
Day 1 , Day 1 ,
Batch 1 Batch 2
0.227
ND


0.098
0.044


ND
ND


ND
0.015


0.059
ND


<0.0006 <0.0006
<0.0006 <0.0006


<0.001 <0.001
<0.001 <0.001


0.3 0.2
0.012 0.015


Day 2



189.655
26.3'95


ND
ND


4.416
ND


ND
ND


<5.000
ND


0.0018
<0.0008


0.0035
0.0067


0.02
0.035
Day 3,
Batch 1
1 .047
0. 187


0.035
0.011


0.055
ND


0.019
ND


0.310
0.047


<0.0006
<0.0006


0.001 1
<0.001


0. 1
0. 13


Day 3,
Batch 2




















<0.0006
<0.0006


<0.001
<0.001


0.086
0.033



-------
            Table V-281 (Continued)



WASTEWATER TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA - PLANT V

Steam
Pol 1 utant Code
Toxic Pollutants (Continued)
118. cadmium V-10
V-1 1
V-12
V-13
119. chromium (total) V-10
V- 1 1
V-12
H V-13
0
!j 119a. chromium (hexa- V-10
valent) V-11
	 	 ""120. copper V-10
'V-11
V-12
V-13
121. cyanide (total) V-10
V-1 1
V-12
	 - 	 --• -.--.- 	 	 .- . v-13 -
122. lead V-10
V-1 1
V-12
V-13
123. mercury V-10
V-1 1
V-12
V-13
124. nickel V-10
V-1 1
V-12
V-13

Sampl e
Type

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 -
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

Source


<0 . 03
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
0.061
0.061
0.061
0.061

NA
NA
" 0.088
0.088
0.088
0.088
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
- - <0.01 .--..-
0.036
0.036
0.036
0.036
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
0.055
0.055
0.055
0.055

Day 1 ,
Batch 1

0. 18
0. 14


0.4
0.08



<0.001
<0.001
4.2
0.09


0.21
0.21

......
9.2
0.2


<0.005
<0.005


1 .4
0.06


Concentrations (mg/1) 	
Day 1 , Day 2
Batch 2

0. 17
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
0.4
<0.03
0. 1
0.09


<0.001
4.4
0.039
2. 1
0. 18
<0.1
o!21
0.21
------ <0.1
8.8
0.2
4.8
0. 1
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
1.3
0.038
0. 17
0. 18

Day 3,
' Batch 1

0.08
<0.03


0..2
0.044



<0.001
<0.001
2.3
0.049


0.13
<0. 1


5.2
0.2


<0.005
<0.005


0.7
0.047



Day 3,
Batch 2

0.05
<0.03


0.21
0.07




<0.001
1.7
<0.03


0.27
0.38

-
3.8
0.16


<0.005
<0.005


0.6
0.03



-------
                                                 Table V-281 (Continued)

                                     WASTEWATER TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA - PLANT V
Pollutant
                        Steam
                        Code
Sample
 Type
                                           Source
                                                                   Concentrations Cmg/1)
  Day 1,
  Batch 1
Day 1,
Batch 2
                           Day  2
Day 3,
Batch 1
Day 3,
Batch 2
Toxic Pollutants (Continued)
125.  selenium
126.  silver
127.  thallium
128.  zinc
Nonconventional Pol 1utants
Acidity
Alkalini ty
Aluminum
V-10 1
V-1 1 1
V-12 1
V-1 3 1
V-10 1
V-11 1
V-12 1
V-1 3 1
V-10 1
V-1 1 1
V-12 1
V-1 3 1
V-10 1
V-11 1
V-12 1
V-1 3 1
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.0005
<0.0005
<0.0005
<0.0005
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
0.101
0.101
0.101
0. 101
<0.001
<0.001


0.0011
'<0.0005


<0.001
<0.001


0.5
0.7


V-10
V-1 1
V-12
V-1 3
V-10
V-11
V-12
V-1 3
V-10
V-11
V-12
V-1 3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
<10.0
<10.0
<10.0
<10.0
33.0
33.0
33.0
33.0
0.131
0. 131
0.131
0.131
4,700
                        33
                       196
29.0
 3.1
                                      <0.001
                                      <0.001
                                       0.0019
                                       0.0005
                                      <0.001
                                      <0.001
                                       0.5
                                       0.033
                                      120
                                      20
                                                                       62
                                      34.0
                                       3.7
                                                                                     <0.001
                                                                                     <0.001
                                                                                      0.0007
                                                                                      0.0008
                                                                                     <0.001
                                                                                     <0.0019
                                                                                      3.9
                                                                                      0.3
                                                                                     71
                                                                                    663
                                                                                     93
                                                                                      5.9
                                                                                      18.0
                                             <0.001
                                             <0.001
                                              0.0018
                                              0.001 1
                                             <0.001
                                             <0.001
                                              0.5
                                              0.057
                                                                                                 1 ,890
                                                                                                  294
                                             15.0
                                              1 .1
                                            <0.001
                                            <0.0012
                                             0.001
                                            <0.0005
                                            <0.001
                                            <0.001
                                             0.6
                                             0.054
                                                                                                                940
                                                                                                                963
                                             12.0
                                              1 . 1

-------
                                                         Table V-281 (Continued)

                                             WASTEWATER TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA -  PLANT  V
        Pollutant
                                Steam
                                Code
                                 Samp!e
                                  Type
        Nonconventional  Pollutants (Continued)
H
O
-J
Ul
        Ammonia Nitrogen
       'Barium
Boron
        Calcium
V-10
V-11
V-12
V-13

V-10
V-11
V-12
V-13

V-10
V-1 1
V-12
V-13

V-10
V-11
V-12
V-13
        Chemical  Oxygen Demand   V-10
          (COD)                   V-11
       .  		 ..   ...	V-t2
                                 V-13
        Chloride
        Cobalt
        Fluoride
                         V-10
                         V-11
                         V-12
                         V-13

                         V-10.
                         V-1 1
                         V-12
                         V-13

                         V-10
                         V-11
                         V-12
                         V-13

Source

0.07
0.07
0.07
0.07
0.2
0.2
.0.2
0.2
<0.2 ,
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
0.045
0.045
0.045
0.045
<50.0
<50.0
<:.50>0 	
<50.0
36.0
36.0
36.0
36.0
. 0.044
0.044
0.044
0.044
0.41
0.41
0.41
0.41

Day 1 ,
Batch 1
0.92
1 .3


2.6
0.8


1 .6
0.4


268.0
1,418.0


<50
<50


385
100


2.2
0.073


12
0.75


Concent rat ion;
Day 1 ,
Batch 2
0.9
1 .5


2.3
0. 13


1 .4
0.3


230.0
1 ,750


80
10
.

210
55


.: -. ,2,. i
0.049


7.4
5. 1


5 (mg/1
Day



<0
16


0
1


0
0


68
47


<50



230
120


0
0


4
4
)
2



.02



.5
.0


.6
.6


.0
.0










.18
.15


.7
.7

Day 3,
Batch 1
<0.02
1 .6


1 .4
0. 1


0.8
0. 14


457.0
1 ,336.0


<50



38
60


0.9
0.079


9.4
1 .9



Day 3,
Batch 2
1 .3
1 .5
,

0.8
0.195


0.8
0. 102


492.0
1 ,350.0


15

	 .„, . .... ;..„ _ ., 	

30
42


0.8
0.05


6.35
2.4



-------
                                                         Table V-281 (Continued)

                                             WASTEWATER TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA - PLANT V
        Pollutant
                                Steam
                                Code
Sample
 Type
                                                   Source
                                                                           Concentrations (mg/1)
Day 1.
Batch 1
Day 1,
Batch 2
Day 2
Day 3,
Batch 1
Day 3,
Batch 2
        Nonconventional Pol 1utants  (Continued)
o
-o
a\
        Iron
        Magnesium
        Manganese
        Molybdenum
        Nitrate
        Phosphorus
        Sodium
        Sulfate
V-10 1
V-11. 1
V-12 1
V-13 1
V-10 1
V-1 1 1
V-12 1
V-13 1
V-10 1
V-1 1 1
V-12 1
V-13 1
V-10 1
V-1 1 1
V-12 1
V-13 1
V-10 1
V-11 1
V-12 1
V-10 1
V-11 1
V-12 1
V-13 1
V-10 1
V-1 1 1
V-12 1
V-13 1
V-10 1
V-1 1 1
V-12 1
V-13 1
0.16
0.16
0.16
0.16
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
0.058
0.058
0.058
0.058
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<0.09
<0.09
<0.09
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
74.0
74.0
74.0
74.0
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
8
0


24
1


1
1


9
2


6,600
5,400

60
1


860
778


84
73


                                       7.6
                                       0.4
                                       5.7
                                       0.42
                                       0.058
                                       0.6
                                       9.2
                                       4.0
                                                                            6,200
                                       5.8
                                      <0.18
                                     220.0
                                     217.0
                                       8.8
                                      97
                                                                                             37.0
                                                                                             44.0
                                                                                             50.0
                                                                                          2,400.0
                                                     0.8
                                                     1 .2
                                                                                              2.1
                                                                                              0.094
                                                                                             46
                                                                                              2.9
                                                                                              2.3
                                                                                           1,519.0
                                                                                              11 .2
                                                                                              12
                                                                                           1,100
                                            7.8
                                            0.17
                                           31 .0
                                            4.8
                                            1 .1
                                            0.081
                                            4.3
                                            1.6
                                                               3,300
                                             1.9
                                             0.88
                                         1,030.0
                                         1,033.0
                                            10
                                           97
                                             8.7
                                             0.15
                                             6.4
                                             0.25
                                             0.7
                                             0.042
                                             5.1
                                             1 .4
                                                                                                                       3,100
                                             16
                                             2.1
                                           305.0
                                          1,072.0
                                            93
                                            91

-------
            Table V-281 (Continued)



WASTEWATER TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA - PLANT V
Concentrations (mg/1)
Steam
Pol 1 utant Code
Sampl e
Type
Source

Day 1 ,
Batch 1
Day 1 ,
Batch 2
Day 2

Day 3,
Batch 1
Day 3,
Batch 2
Nonconventi onal Pol 1 utants (Continued)
Tin V-10
V-1 1
V-1 '2
V-13
Titanium V-10
V-11
V-12
V-13
Total Dissolved Solids V-10
"£j (TDS) V-11
° V-12
-J ' V-13
• — - Total Organic Carbon V-10
(TOO V-11
V-12
V-13
Total Solids (TS) V-10
V-11
V-12
	 : 	 ••-• • - 	 - v~13 -
Uranium V-10
V-11
V- 1 2
, V-13
: : Vanadium V-10
- V-11
V-12
V-13
Yttrium V-10
V-11
V-12
V-13
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
- 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
. 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
<0.25
<0.25
<0.25
<0.25
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
300.0
300.0
300.0
300.0
<10.0
<10.0
<10.0
< 1 0 . 0
330.0
330.0
330.0
330.0
0.89
0.89
0.89
0.89
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
. <0.03
<0.1
<0. 1
<0. 1
<0. 1
0.3
<0.25


24.0
<0.2


11,000
6,850


320
50 .


12,000
7,300

	
2,300
3.4


6.0
0.04


1 .7
<0. 1


0.3
<0.2


23.0
<0.2


11,000
7,600


45
,.'

12,000
7,400

- - - • - 	
2,100
4.6


5.3
<0.03


1.6
0.1




<0.25
<0.25


0.9
1 .3


7,900
11 ,000

1 ,800
<1


1,500
14,000


37
0.427


0.245
0.11


0.3
<0. 1
<0.25
<0.25


15.0
0.3


7,000
6,100


39
2


7,100
900


1,300
30


2.7
0.041


1.3
<0. 1


<0.2
<0.25


6.8
<0.2


5,600
6,600


<]


6,200
6,800

-• - •-; 	 -
6.4
5.1


1.8
0.12


0.8
<0. 1



-------
I
                                                                      Table  V-281  (Continued)

                                                         WASTEWATER  TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA  - PLANT V
                     Pollutant
                                             Steam
                                             Code
                                 Sample
                                  Type
                                           Source
                                                                                        Concentrations (mg/1)
Day 1,
Batch 1
Day 1,
Batch 2
Day 2
Day 3,
Batch 1
Day 3,
Batch 2
              O
              -J
              00
                    Nonconventional  Pol 1utants  (Continued)
                    Gross Alpha
                    Gross  Beta
Radium-226
                     Conventional  Pollutants
                    Oi1  and  Grease
V-10 1
V-11 1
V-12 1
V-13 1
V-10 1
V-l 1 1
V-12 1
V-13 1
V-10 1
V-l 1 1
V-12 1
V-13 1
0
0
0
0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
.014
.014
.014
.014
.013
.013
.013
.013
.0008
.0008
.0008
.0008
2,250
3.0


3,310
4.6


0.0087
<0.0008


2, 160
2.8


3.079
4.4


O.OI
O.OI


                                              V-10
                                              V-1 1
                                              V-12
                                              V-13
                                             .0
                                             .0
                                             .0
                                             .0
                                                                                             Concentrations (nCi/L)
                                                                                                          25.4
                                                                                                           0.23
                                                                                                          38.3
                                                                                                           1 .0
                                                                                                           0.0045
                                                                                                          <0.0009
                                                                                             Concentrations (mg/1)
                                                                                                  994
                                                                                                    0.94
                                                                                                                     1 ,520
                                                                                                                         2.6
                                                                                                    0.0049
                                                                                                   <0.0011
                                                         96.7
                                                          1 . 1
                                                                                                                 154
                                                                                                                  2.0
                                                          0.0060
                                                         <0.0013
 83
  7
                                                                                            60
                                                                                                                       220
                                                                                                                                      10
                         15,000
                              1

-------
H
O

-------
                  Table V-282



WASTEWATER TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA - PLANT W
                                         Concentrations (mg/1)


Pol lutant
Code Type
Source
Day 1 Da
y 2 Day 3
Toxic Pollutants






H
O
00
O






11 .
14.
22.
23.
44.
66.
69.
86.
1 14.
115.
1 17.
118.
119.
120.
121 .
1 , 1 ,1-trichloro-
ethane
1 , 1 ,2-trichloro-
ethane
p-chl oro-m-cresol
chl orof orm
methylene chloride
bis(2-ethylhexyl)
phthalate
di-n-octyl phthalate
toluene
antimony
arsenic
beryl 1 i urn
cadmium
chromium (total )
copper
cyanide (total)
W-3
W-3
W-3
W-3
W-3
W-3
W-3
W-3
W-3
W-3
W-3
W-3
W-3
W-3
W-3
1
1
6
1
1
6
6
1
6
6
6
6
6
6
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
<0.0006
<0.001
0.2
<0.03
0.052
<0.03
<0. 1
ND
0.210
ND
ND
31 .000
ND
ND
3.400
0.0006
<0.001
0.059
<0.03
<0.04
0.032
0.63
0.360
ND
0.048
ND
9.700
0.016
0.012
8.900
0.0006
0.002
<0.01
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<0. 1






<0.0006
<0.001
<0.01
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03


-------
                                Table V-282 (Continued)



                    WASTEWATER TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA - PLANT W
Pol lutant

Stream Sample
Code Type
Concentrations (mg/1)
Source
Day 1
Da
y 2
Day 3
Toxic Pollutants (Continued)
122. lead
123. mercury
124. nickel
1 25 . sel eni urn
126. silver
127. thai 1 ium
128. zinc
Nonconvent ional Pollutants
l_i Acidity
O
00 Alkalinity
H
"" Aluminum
Ammonia Nitrogen
Barium
Boron
- 	 - 	 Cal-cium - -
Chemical Oxygen Demand
W-3
W-3
W-3
W-3
W-3
W-3
W-3
W-3
.W-3
- W-3 	
W-3
W-3
W-3
W--3 	
W-3
6 0.1
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
<0
0
<0
<0
<0
0
10
12
— o
<0
1
0
-_ 8
<50
.005
.039
.0004
.005
.001
.036
.0
.0
.089 	
.02
.6
. 19
,5 -- -
.0
0
<0
0
<0
0
<0
0
70
25
0
1
0
0
28
<50
. 13
.005
. 1 1
.0004
.005
.001
.046
.0
.0
.9
.6
. 1
. 083
.0
.0
0.
<0.
0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
0.
20.
18.
1-.
1 .
0.
0-
- - 1 .
<50.
1
5
053
0004
005
001
048
0
0
3
1
067
3
5
0
0
<0
0
<0
0
<0
0
10
18
1
0
0
13

. 12
.005
.045
.0004
.008
.001
.047
.0
.0
.2 " " 	 — •• . . . -. —
.061
.12
-0 - - 	 - 	 - 	 - 	 ..-.- r--- 	 - 	

(COD)

-------
            Table V-282 (Continued)



WASTEWATER TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA - PLANT W









H
O
00
to
Pol lutant
Nonconventional Pol lutants
Chloride
Cobalt
Fluoride
Iron
Magnesium
Manganese
Mol ybdenum
Phosphorus
Sodium
Sulfate
Tin
(Continued)
W-3
W-3
W-3
W-3
W-3
W-3
W-3
W-3
W-3
W-3
W-3
Stream
Code

6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
Samp 1 e
3.0
<0.03
0.2"
0.072
2.0
11.0
0.08
<0. 18
14.0
6.2
<0.25
Concentrations
Source
520.0
<0.025
34.0
0.3
0.06
<0.1
<0.03
<0. 18
390.0
8.5
<0.25
Day 1
73.0
<0.03
31 .0
<0.03
3.4
0.3
<0.03
<0. 18
170.0
8.5
<0.25
(mg/1)
Day 2 Day 3
28.0
<0.03
26.0
0.11
2.9
0.2
<0.03

110.0
25.0
<0.25

-------
                                  Table V-282 (Continued)

                      WASTEWATER TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA - PLANT W

" Pollutant
Stream Sample
	 Code Type
Concentrations (mg/1)
Source
- Day
1 Day 2 Day 3
Nonconventional Pollutants (Continued)







H
O
00
U)

Titanium
Total Dissolved Solids
(TDS)
Total Organic Carbon
(TOO
Total Solids (TS)
Vanadium
Yttrium
Zi rconium
Conventional Pollutants
Oi 1 and Grease
Total Suspended Solids
. W-3 -
W-3
W-3
W-3
W-3
W-3
W-3
W-3
W-3
	 6. ..
6
6
6
6
6
6
1
6
.... <0
52
250
80
<0
<0
140
6
1
.2 .
.0
.0
.0
.03
. 1

.0
.0
<0
1 ,400
20
1 ,300
<0
<0
13
71
1
.25
.0
.0
.0
.03
. 1

.0
.0
.. 
-------
                   Table V-283



WASTEWATER TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA - PLANT X
Toxic
114.
115.
1 17.
1 18.
1 19.
£ 120.
00
it*
122.
123.
124.
Pol lutant
Pol lutants
antimony
arseni c
beryl 1 ium
cadmium
chromium (total )
copper
lead
mercury
ni ckel

X-4
X-6
X-4
X-6
X-4
X-6
X-4
X-6
X-4
X-6
X-4
X-6
X-4
X-6
X-4
X-6
X-4
X-6

1
4
1
4
1
4
1
4
1
4
1
4
1
4
1
4
1
4
Stream Sample
Code Tvoe

<0.2
<0.2
<0.005
<0.005
<0.02
<0.02
<0.03
<0.03
<0.02
<0.02
<0.05
<0.05
<0.1
<0.1
<0.005
<0.005
<0.1
<0.1
Concentrations
Source

<0.2
<0.2
<0.005
<0.005
<0.02
<0.02
0.07
<0.03
0.02
<0.02
0.8
<0.05
7.1
0.12
<0.005
<0.005
7.0
0.17
Day 1
<0.2
<0.2
<0.005
<0.005
<0.02
<0.02
0.05
<0.03
<0.02
<0.02
0.5
0.02
7.0
<0.1
<0.005
<0.005
6.8
0.14
(mg/1)
Day 2 Day 3
<0.2
<0.2
<0.005
<0.005
<0.02
<0.02
0.04
<0.03
<0.03
<0.02
0.4
0.024
4.5
0.11
<0.005
<0.005
4.6
0.3

-------
            Table V-283 (Continued)



WASTEWATER TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA - PLANT X
Stream Sample Concentrations (mg/1)
. . _ . . .. Pollutant- _ 	
Code . _Iyp
e Source
Day 1 - Day 2 - Day 3 - ...
Toxic Pol 1 utants (Continued)
125. selenium
126. silver
127. thallium
128. zinc
Nonconvent i onal
Acidity
H
O
00 Alkalinity
Ul
~ Aluminum
Barium
X-4
X-6 • ' ' -
X-4
X-6
X-4
X-6
X-4
X-6
Pol 1 utants
X-4
X-6
X-4
X-6
X-4
X-6
X-4
X-6
1
4
1
4
1
4
1
4
1
4
1
4
-t
4
1
4x
<0.005
<0.005
0.002
0.002
<0.005
<0.005
0.074
0.074
11
11
122
122
0.12
0. 12
<0.02
<0.02
<0.005
<0.005
0.57
<0.002
0.11
0.075
<0.02
0.025
11
<10
129
362
0 . 22
1 .0
<0.02
<0.02
<0.005
<0.005
0.37
0.006
0.075
0.055
<0.03
0. 1
11
<10
135
119
0.1
2.1
<0.02
<0.02
<0.005
<0.005 - ~ '
0.48
1 .9
0.082
0.052
<0.03
0.2
130
<10
172
75
<0.1 •" 	
1.8
<0.02
<0.02

-------
            Table V-283 (Continued)



WASTEWATER TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA - PLANT X


Pol lutant

Stream Sample
Code Type
Concentrations (mg/1)
Source
Day 1
Day 2 Day 3
Nonconventional Pol lutant (Continued)





H
O
00
a\
Boron
Cal cium
Cobalt
Columbium
Fl uoride
Iron
Magnesium
X-4
X-6
X-4
X-6
X-4
X-6
X-4
X-6
X-4
X-6
X-4
X-6
X-4
X-6
1
4
1
4
1
4
1
4
1
4
1
4
1
4
0.073
0.073
31
31
<0.02
<0.02
ND
ND
1 . 1
1 . 1
0.052
0.052
10
10
2.6
1 .6
30
17
<0.02
"<0.02
ND
0.12
1 .6
170
2.3
0.1
9. 1
0.91
3.0
17
36
25
<0.03
<0.03
ND
1 .8
1 .5
200
2.0
0.3
1 1
6.0
4.2
3.4
36
35
<0.03
<0.03
ND
3.4
1 .0
160
1.1
0.3
1 1
8.2

-------
            Table V-283 (Continued)



WASTEWATER TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA - PLANT X
Stream Sample Concentrations (mg/1)
Pbriuta'ht

Nonconventional Pol 1 utants
- Manganese

Molybdenum

Sodium

Tantal urn

Tin

Ti tanium
H
O
^j Total Dissolved Solids
	 - - - (TDS)
Total Solids (TS)

Tungsten

X-4
X-6
X-4
X-6
X-4
X-6
X-4
X-6
X-4
X-6
X-4
X-6

X-4
X-6
X-4
X-6
X-4
X-6

(Cont i ntred)
-1 . . .
4
1
4
1
4
1
4
1
4
1
4

1
4
1
4
1
4
Code TV

. . <0.01
<0.01
<0.03
<0.03
23
23
ND
ND
<0.5
<0.5
<0.2
<0.2

2,400
2,400
2,600
2,600
ND
ND
'pe Source

. . 0.05 ..
<0.01
0.7
<0.03
2,000
980
ND
5.8
<0.5
<0.5
<0.2
1 .0

5,200
3, .100
5,200
3,000
14
0.42
Day 1 —

0 .07
<0.01
0.6
<0.03
1 ,400
830
ND
6. 15
<0.5
<0.5
<0.2
0.7

3,700
2,900
3,700
3,000
8.9
1 .45
- Day 2 Day"3 -- - -

	 0.04 	 	
<0.01
0.6
<0.03
1,600
840
ND
12
<0.5
<0.5
<0.2
0.6

4,200
2,600 	 ._. 	 . 	 ___
8,100
2,800
13.5
2.2

-------
                                  Table V-283 (Continued)

                      WASTEWATER TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA - PLANT X

Pol lutant
Stream Sample
Code Type
Concentrati ons
Source Day 1
Cmg/ 1 )
Day 2 Day 3
Nonconventional Pol lutants (Continued)





O
CO
CO
Vanadium
Yttrium
Conventional Pol lutants
Oi 1 and Grease
Total Suspended Solids
pH (standard units)
X-4 1 <0.1
X-6 4 <0.1
X-4 1 <0.0001
X-6 4 XQ.OOOI
(Continued)
X-4 1 4
X-6 1 4
X-4 1 <1
X-6 4 <1
X-4 1 7.06
X-6 4 7.06
<0.1 <0.1
<0. 1 <0 . 1
<0. 1 <0 . 1

7 2
15 <1
5 17
<1 200
7.95 8.03
11.58 " 10.87
<0. 1
<0. 1

-------
Table V-284







H
0
00
Toxic
114.
115.
1 17.
1 18.
1 19.
120.
121 .
122.
WMO 1 E
Pol lutant
Pol lutants
antimony
arsenic
beryl 1 ium
cadmi um
chromium (total )
copper
cyanide (total)
lead
LVVM i c.r\ i r\t.n t
Y-13
Y-13
Y-13
Y-13
Y-13
Y-13
Y-13
Y-13
IVIUIl 1 r L.I
Stream
Code
6
6
6
6
6
6
1
6
0
0
<0
<0
<0
<0
0
0
Sample
Type
.0002
.002
.02
.03
.02
.02
.03
.067
Concentrations (mg/T)
Source Day 1
0
0
<0
<0
<0
0
0
0
.0002
.002
.02
.03
.02
.02
.48
. 14
<0
<0
<0
<0
0
<0
0
0
Day 2 Day 3
.0002
.001
.02
.03
.02
.02
.45
. 14
<0.0002
0.005
<0.02
<0.03
0.032
<0.02
0.07
0.15

-------
             Table V-284 (Continued)



WASTEWATER TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA - PLANT Y







H
O
ID
O
Pol lutant
Toxic Pol lutants (Continued)
123. mercury
124. nickel
125. selenium
126. silver
127. thallium
128. zinc
Nonconventional Pollutants
Acidity
Alkalinity

Y-13
Y-13
Y-13
Y-13
Y-13
Y-13
Y-13
Y-13
Stream
Code

6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
Samp 1 e
<0.005
0.1
<0.001
<0.0005
<0.001
0.08
1 1 .0
31 .0
Concentrations (mg/1)
Source Day
<0.005
0.3
<0.001
<0.0005
<0.001
<0.03
<10.0
44.0
_1 Day 2
<0.005
0.3
<0.001
0.0006
<0.001
<0.03
21 .0
28.0
Day 3
<0.005
0.7
<0.001
<0.0005
0.003
<0.03
40.0
31 .0

-------
                                            Table V-284 (Continued)
O
VO
H
                  Pol 1utant

       Nonconventional  Pol 1utants (Continued)

       Aluminum                       Y-13

       Barium                         V-13

       Boron                          Y-13

       Calcium                        Y-13

       Cobalt                         Y-13

       Fluoride                       Y-13

       Iron                           Y-13

       Magnesium                      Y-13
IENT* PERFORMANCE DATA -
Stream Sample
Code Type
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
0
<0
2
12
<0
290
0
1
.03
.02
.2
.0
.03
.0
.061
.8
PLANT Y
Concent rat Tons (mg/1) - -
Source
0.2
<0
2
8,000
0
20
0
23
.02
. 1
.0
.03
.0
.2
.0
Day 1
0
<0
0
3, 100
<0
11
0
23
Da
.5
.02
.7
.0
.03
.0
. 1
.0
y 2 Day 3
0. 1
<0.
1 .
4,300.
0.
11 .
ti.
30.
02
0
0
042
0
2
0

-------
                                       Taiy.e V-*8'i U-mtlnued)

                            WASTEWATER TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA - PLANT Y
o
IO
                                       Stream    Sample    	Cor
           Pollutant                    Code      Type     Source


Nonconventional  Pollutants (Continued)

Manganese                      Y-13     6       <0.01       <0.01


Molybdenum                     Y-13     6        0.056       1.5


Sodium                         Y-13     6       14.0       880.0


Tin                            Y-13     6       <1.0        <1.0


Titanium                       Y-13     6        0.5         0.2


Total Dissolved Solids (TDS)   Y-13     6      120.0     9,984.0


Total Solids  (TS)              Y-13     6      120.0     9,500.0


Vanadium                       Y-13     6       <0.1        <0.1


Yttrium                        Y-13     6       <0.1        <0.1
                                                                     Concentrations (ma/1)
                                                                           Day 1
                                                                                    Day 2
   Day 3
                                                                               <0.01


                                                                                1.1


                                                                            1,200.0


                                                                               <1 .0


                                                                                0.4


                                                                              110.0


                                                                              160.0
  0.02


  0.9


960.0




  0.2


 84.0


200.0

-------
                                         Table V-284 (Continued)

                             WASTEWATER TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA - PLANT V
                  Pollutant

       Conventional  Pollutants

       011  and Grease             " "  Y-13

       Total  Suspended Solids (TSS)   Y-13

       pH (standard  units)            Y-13
                                              S-t ream
                                               Code
 1.0

54.0

 6
               Concentrations (mg/1)
Source



  2.0

 65.0

 10
 7.0

40.0

 7
<1 .0


15.0

 7
O
vo
10
       NA - Not analyzed.

       1.  No analyses were performed on the following toxic pollutants:  1-113, 116, and 129.

-------
                                        Table V-285

                      WATERWATER TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA - PLANT Z
           Pollutant
Toxic Pollutants

114.  antimony



115.  arsenic



117.  beryl 1ium



118.  cadmium



119.  chromium  (total)



120.  copper



 122.   lead



 123.   mercury



 124.   nickel



 125.   selenium



 126.   silver
Z-5
Z-6
Z-7

Z-5
Z-6
Z-7

Z-5
Z-6
Z-7

Z-5
Z-6
Z-7

Z-5
Z-6
Z-7

Z-5
Z-6
Z-7

Z-5
Z-6
Z-7

Z-5
Z-6
Z-7

Z-5
Z-6
Z-7

Z-5
Z-6
 Z-7

 Z-5
 Z-6
 Z-7
Stream
Code
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Samp 1 e
Concentrations (mg/1)
Type Source Day 1 Day z uay a
0.0004
0.0004
0.0004
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
0.038
0.038
0.038
0.013
0.013
0.013
0.097
0.097
0.097
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
0.038
0.038
0.038
0.0004
0.0004
0.0004
0.0005
0.0005
0.0005
0.0066
0.00025
0.00025
0.34
0.0053
<0.001
0.03
<0.01
<0.01
0.074
<0.01
0.026
13
1
0.07
0.5
0.042
0.031
1 .102
0.62
0. 15
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
0.48
0.084
0.059
0.0011
0,0016
0.0004
0.0022
0.057
0.044

-------
                 Pollutant
                                        Table  V-285  (Continued)

                           "WSTERWATER "TREATMENT "PERFORMANCE "DATrA  -"PLANT"Z~~

                                                                     Concentrations (mg/1)
     Toxic  Pollutants  (Continued)
H
O
vo
 127.  thallium



 128.  zinc



 Nonconventional Pollutants

 Acidi ty


 Alkalinity


 A1umi num



 Barium



 Boron



 Calcium



 Cobalt



Columbium



Fluoride
                                  Z-5
                                  Z-6
                                  Z-7

                                  Z-5
                                  Z-6
                                  Z-7
Z-6
Z-7

Z-6
Z-7

Z-5
Z-6
Z-7

Z-5
Z-6
Z-7

Z-5
Z-6
Z-7

Z-5
Z-6
Z-7

Z-5
Z-6
Z-7

Z-5
Z-6
Z-7

Z-5
Z-6
Z-7
                                       .Stream
                                         Code
                     Samp 1e-
                     Type
                      <0.001
                      <0.001
                      <0.001

                      <0.25
                      <0.25
                      <0.25
                                                                 Source
                                                         0.04

                                                         0.5
                                                         0.5
                                                         0.5

                                                        79
                                                        79
                                                        79 •

                                                        <0.01
                                                        <0.01
                                                        <0.01

                                                        ND
                                                        ND
                                                        ND

                                                         0.2
                                                         0.2
                                                         0.2
     0.0036
     0.064
     0.027

     0.41
     0.053
     0.036
                                                                     27
69
69
0.11
0.11
0.1 1
0.04
0.04
925
57
36
2
0
0
0



.4
.23
.34
.2
     0. 128

     7.7
     3.4
     1 .2
28,000
 9,300
 1,400
     0.5
     0.059
     0.031

    98
     3.5
    ND

    10
     5.3
     5.9

-------
                                       Table V-285  (Continued)

                           WATERWATER TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA -  PLANT  Z
                Pol lotant
                                            Stream
                                             Code
                                                               Concentrations (mg/1)
                                                           Source    Day 1    Day 2
     Nonconvent-ional Pol lutants  (Continued)
H
O
U3
a\
     Iron
     Magnesium
     Manganese
     Molybdenum
Sodi urn
     Tantalurn
      Tin
      Titanium
Z-5
Z-6
Z-7

Z-5
Z-6
Z-7

Z-5
Z-6
Z-7

Z-5
Z-6
Z-7

Z-5
Z-6
Z-7

Z-5
Z-6
Z-7

Z-5
Z-6
Z-7

Z-5
Z-6
Z-7
0.24
0.24
0.24
8.0
8.0
8.0
0.012
0.012
0.012
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
27
27
27
ND
ND
ND
0.53
83
0.52
83
4.6
0.31
81
3.2
0. 11
0.26
0.12
0.13
760
1 ,200
1,200
90
3
ND
                                                    <0.28
                                                    <0.28
                                                    <0. 28

                                                    <0.25
                                                    <0.25
                                                    <0.25
  0.87
 <0.28
 <0.28
170
 11
 <0.25

-------
                                  Table V-285 (Continued)

                      WATERWATER TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA - PLANT Z

Pol lutant
Nonconventional Pol 1 utants j[
Total Dissolved Sol ids (TDS)
Total Solids (TS)
Vanadi um
Yttrium
1— ' Zirconium
O
VO
Conventional Pollutants
Oi 1 and Grease
Total Suspended Solids (TSS)
^pH ^standard, units)



Cont.)
Z-6
Z-7
Z-6
Z-7
Z-5
Z-6
Z-7
Z-5
Z-6
Z-7
Z-5
Z-6
Z-7

Z-5
Z-6
Z-7
Z-6
Z-7
Z-6
Z-7
- — at ream iamp i e
Code Type

- 1- •- - 1 10 -
1 110
1 390
1 390
1 <0.02
1 <0.02
1 <0.02
1 <0.25
1 <0.25
1 <0.25
1 0.26
1 0.26
1 0.26

1 <1
1 <1
1 <1
1 100
1 100
__.•).---.. - -- - 6
1 6
1 : 6
	 -Concentrations i,mg-/ : j
Source Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
- - - - • • •
1 ,000- - • - • - 	 	
39
1 ,800
1 10
7.9
0.55
0.02
<0.25
<0.25
<0.25
6.7
1.4 . .
<0.25

1
2
3
570
45
12 - ~ - ,_..--.. 	
12 • ' -
6
1.   No analyses were performed on the  following  toxic pollutants:   1  - 113,.116,
121,  and 129.

-------
                               A-3
LEAD ROLLING
EMULSIONS



HOLDING
TANKS
BATCH
DUMP
^-

LEAD CONTINUOUS
 STRIP CASTING
CONTACT COOLING
    WATER
   NON-SCOPE
    PROCESS
  WASTEWATER
                               A-2
                                                CONTRACT
                                                 HAULED
EQUALIZATION
                                                               A-4
                                                       NEUTRALIZATION
                  •CAUSTIC
                                                     PRESSURE FILTRATION
                                                              A-5
                                                        DISCHARGE
                                 FIGURE V-1

                       WASTEWATER SOURCES AT PLANT A
                                      1098

-------
LEAD SEMI-
CONTINUOUS
INGOT
CAST|NG
CONTACT
COOUNG
WATER
I
i
 B-3
                         LIME
                        ALUM
                     POLYMER
                        H2S04-
                                   EQUALIZATION
                                          B-7
   FLASH
   MIXING
                                   FLOCCULATION/
                                   CLARIFICATION
    pH
ADJUSTMENT
                                          B-8
                                   DISCHARGE
          FIGURE V-2

WASTEWATER SOURCES AT PLANT B
              1099

-------
    LEAD
    SEMI-
 CONTINUOUS
INGOT CASTING
  CONTACT
  COOLING
   WATER
   LEAD
  DRAWING
   SPENT
  EMULSION
        C-2
B..7CH
                                              DISCHARGE
DUMP
   SOURCE
    WELL
   WATER
      C-1

 	9
                         FIGURE V-3

               WASTEWATER SOURCES AT PLANT C
                           1100

-------
  .NICKEL ROLLING CONTACT
      COOLING WATER
  NICKEL FORGING CONTACT
      COOLING WATER
 NICKEL FORGING PRESS
HYDRAULIC FLUID LEAKAGE
                               0-12
  NICKEL GRINDING RINSEWATERS
   NICKEL MOLTEN SALT BATH
                           BLEED
      NICKEL MOLTEN SALT
         RINSEWATER
  NICKEL SURFACE TREATMENT
           BATH
  NICKEL SURFACE TREATMENT
        RINSEWATER
    NICKEL WET AIR
  POLLUTION CONTROL
                                 n.11
                                 -&
                                     SLOWDOWN
  NICKEL ALKALINE CLEANING
          BATH
  NICKEL ALKALINE CLEANING
       RINSEWATER
                             0-14
                            -«-
                              D-1S
                            —O-
                     90-19
   NICKEL/COBALT POWDER
  ATOMIZATION WASTEWATER
                         BATCH
                         DUMP
        LAB WASTES
! GROUNOWATER INFILTRATION
                                                                      EQUALIZATION
                                                                          &D-20

                                                                CHROMIUM REDUCTION
                                                                      ANDpH
                                                                    ADJUSTMENT
                                                                                        .HiSC-4
                                                                                        -SO,
                                                                                        -LIME
                                                                                   -POLYELECTROLYTE
                                                                      CLARIFICATION
                                                                        »D-21
                                                                                   ^ TO WET AIR
                                                                                  •*• POLLUTION
                                                                                      CONTROL
                                                                       DISCHARGE
i NICKEL VACUUM MELTING STEAM CONDENSATE

: NICKEL ANNEALING CONTACT COOLING WATER




COOLING
TOWER
ISCHARGE
D-S^BLOWDOWN^
® *'

                                                                          • DISCHARGE
     NICKEL ROLLING CONTACT COOLING WATER
                                                            0-2
                                                                 SLOWDOWN
                                                                .-••"•'   i. & DISCHARGE
                                                        I 0-4




HOLDING
TANK


NICKEL SAWING SPENT EMULSIONS
ȣ
0-16
*-«—
PAPER
FILTRATION
BATCH
DUMP


                                                                         CONTRACT
                                                                          HAULED
                                                                         CONTRACT
                                                                          HAULED
                                           )0-17. D-18
' NICKEL SAWING. GRINDING
SPENT EMULSIONS


**
HOLDING
TANKS
BATCH
DUMP


! NICKEL ROLL GRINDING
; EMULSION

0-5^
MAGNETIC
FILTRATION
BATCH
DUMP


                                                               CONTRACT
                                                                HAULED
                                                                CONTRACT
                                                                 HAULED
                          FIGURE V-4

          WASTEWATER SOURCES AT PLANT D
                                1101

-------
NICKEL MOLTiN SALT
BATH
NICKEL MOLTEN SALT
RINSEWATER

NICKEL SURFACE
TREATMENT BATHS
NICKEL SURFACE
TREATMENT RINSEWATER

NON-SCOPE PROCESS
WASTEWATER

NICKEL VACUUM MELTING
STEAM CONDENSATE
BATCH CONTRACT — —
DUMP " "AULfcO | -
BATCH T
	 .£ DUMP *~ . E-8 E-9 :
MIXIIMfi
BATCH CONTRACT cCn,™V,n,
DUMP HHULCU
E-2 1 '

1 r :

_fci OVERFLOW
-*_— _ TOWER ' '

="» bUUALUA 1 IUN I
NON-SCOPE PROCESS
WASTEWATER

NICKEL EXTENSION PRESS
AND SOLUTION HEAT
TREATMENT CONTACT
COOLING WATER

NICKEL ANNEALING
CONTACT COOLING WATER

NON-SCOPE PROCESS
WASTEWATER

NICKEL EXTRUSION
PRESS HYDRAULIC
FLUID LEAKAGE

„„ V

SEDIMENTATION •*— ALUM, POLYMER
BATCH
DUMP ' | 	 ' ,
— ® SAND FILTRATION
E-3 (OPTIONAL) :
__ , 	 , |
^ 	 ?
	 »• rnni.NR SLOWDOWN ^ DISCHARGE
.* 	 TOWER

CLAY
POLYMERS HYPOCHLORITE ,
* 1
E-6 OIL E-7 SEDIMEN-
a HOLDING <> EXTENDED TATION », CHLORINATIOK \
' TANK RATOR AERATION 1 	 — 	 1 * 1 	 1 j
/
1 • RIVER '
LIGHT AND HEAVY
OILS CONTRACT
HAULED
NICKEL BATCH CONTRACT
fltvtwiGNlA pyYjp *• HAULED
RINSEWATER

	 	 E-
SOURCE RIVER 	 $
WATER
1
ft
         FIGURE V-5
WASTEWATER SOURCES AT PLANT E


-------
NICKEL STAIONARY CASTING
CONTACT COOLING WATER

NICKEL HEAT TREATMENT
. CONTACT COOLING WATER

NON-CONTACT COOLING
WATER

NICKEL SURFACE
TREATMENT BATHS
NICKEL SURFACE
TREATMENT RINSEWATER

NON-SCOPE RROCESS
WASTEWATER

LUBRICANT

NICKEL AMONIA
RINSEWATER
NICKEL ALKALINE
CLEANING BATHS

NICKEL SURFACE
• TREATMENT BATHS

NICKEL ROLL
GRINDING EMULSION

NICKEL SAWING.
GRINDING EMULSIONS

NICKEL ROLLING EMULSION

NICKEL GRINDING RINSEWATER


^RECIHCULA
WATER

riNG t ;e ' 	
^ TO NICKEL SURFACE TREATMENT AND
— »• SYSTEM '°' ALKALINE CLEANING BINSE OPERATIONS

®F30 SODA ASH


|
F-7 F-8.F-9.F-10.F-1t
LAKE TO
NON-SCOPE :
OPERATIONS

' r
~ 	 ' 	 ' "•• v
EQUALIZATION. MIXING
•* 	 »8ATCH^F'18
"*™ , gf'9 »,
DUMP ^
BATCH 4*F'27
DUMP **
F-ZB. F-29
BATCH ffl
DUMP '**
f* t BATCH
DUMP
—f-ZS. M4. MS. F-26
T BATCH
DUMP
~* ,ft f BATCH
W F'33
1 F
pH ADJUSTMENT
*



SEDIMENTATION
•i--
DISCHARGE
I
STEAM.

,-f BATCH, „ 1 	 1 I °"C7'"" 1
^' DUMP , T
                                                                                                4— SODA ASH
                                                                                                 -POLYMER
                                                                     'OILTO ,
                                                                   RECLAIMER
NICKEL ROLLING CONTACT
COOLING WATER



OIL
SKIMMING
t
OIL TO
RECLAIMER


NICKEL ROLLING CONTACT
COOLING WATER

                                                      -»• DISCHARGE
                                    OIL TO
                                  RECLAIMER
| NICKEL WET AIR POLLUTION CONTROL  |	»-| MAGNETIC SEPARATION [
	  F-6
|  NICKEL MOLTEN SALT RINSEWATER  [—<^—*• DISCHARGE
-»• DISCHARGE
  MICKEL ALKALINE CLEANING BATHS
     MICKEL ALKALINE CLEANING
         ! RJNSEWATER
                                                      DISCHARGE
     NICKEL DIRECT CHILL CASTING CONTACT COOLING WATER
  NICKEL FORGING PRESS HYDRAULIC FLUID LEAKAGE
                                               -••DISCHARGE
                                                     F 17
    MICKEL HEAT TREATMENT CONTACT COOLING WATER
                                                              DISCHARGE]
   NICKEL ULTRASONIC TESTING WASTEWATER
                                                »• DISCHARGE
   NICKEL DRAWING NEAT OIL
                                 BATCH
  SOURCE RIVER WATER ^J	®
                                 DUMP
                                                               »• OIL RECLAIMER
                                 FIGURE V-6

                 WASTEWATER SOURCES AT PLANT F
                                        1103

-------
    ZINC SURFACE
   TREATMENT BATH
    ZINC SURFACE
TREATMENT RINSEWATER
                                G-3
TO WASTEWATER
  TREATMENT
-•-DISCHARGE
     ZINC ALKALINE
    CLEANING BATH
    ZINC ALKALINE
 CLEANING RINSEWATER
                               G-2
TO WASTEWATER
  TREATMENT
-•-DISCHARGE
  SOURCE CITY WATER
                                G-1
                                FIGURES V-7

                      WASTEWATER SOURCES AT PLANT G


                                   1104


-------
PRECIOUS METALS SHOT
CASTING CONTACT COOLING
i WATER

1-3

PRECIOUS METALS CONTINUOUS
CASTING CONTACT COOLING
WATER
1
PRECIOUS METALS
TUMBLING WASTEWATER
1
PRECIOUSJMETALS SURFACE
TREATMENT BATH '
PRECIOUSi'METALS SURFACE
TREATMIENT RINSEWATER
i
PRECIOUS METALS ALKALINE
CLEANING PRE-BONDING
WASTEWATERS

*&
1-2
<9\ *-
 •'
1-4
(0, ,
(351 B.
1-10
^a.
^
1-8. 1-9
	 	 a- — -*

i
STEAM CONDENSATE




(» 1-11,1-12
EQUALIZATION AND
pH ADJUSTMENT

SEDIMENTATION
!
SEDIMENTATION
y 1-13
PRECIOUS METALS ROLLING
    SPENT EMULSION
                          BATCH
DUMP
              DISCHARGE
                      I-7
PRECIOUS METALS DRAWING
SPENT EMULSION
BATCH
DUMP


  PRECIOUS METALS ROLL
GRINDING SPENT EMULSION
                          BATCH
DUMP
            •*- DISCHARGE
    SOUFJICE
   CITY WATER
                       1-1
                               DISCHARGE
                                                                           • CAUSTIC
                                                                            •COPPER
                                                                             IRON
                                                                           "FILINGS
                                    FIGURE V-8
                                              I
                          WASTEWATER SOURCES AT PLANT I
                                       1105

-------
   IRON STEAM TREATMENT
     WET AIR POLLUTION
         CONTROL
IRON CLEANING
 WASTEWATER
 IRON/COPPER
  TUMBLING
 WASTEWATER
IRON/COPPER
 GRINDING
 EMULSIONS
                                                                DISCHARGE
  SOURCE
 CITY WATER
                   J-8
                           FIGURE V-9

                 WASTEWATER SOURCES AT PLANT J
                               1106

-------
 PRECIOUS METALS
PRESSURE BONDING
 CONTACT COOLING
     WATER
 PRECIOUS METALS
ALKALINE CLEANING
   PREBONDING
   WASTEWATER   !
 PRECIOUS METALS
    TUMBLING
  WA5JTEWATER  '.
K-2
                                        K-4
                                                    TO WASTEWATER
                                                      TREATMENT
                                               DISCHARGE
                           K-3
                        TO WASTEWATER
                          TREATMENT
DISCHARGE
   SOURCE;CITY
     WATER
                          K-1
                                FIGURE V-10

                      WASTEWATER SOURCES AT PLANT K
                           -   .      .   ..  [ .

                                    1107

-------
              L-10
 TITANIUM SAWING
SYNTHETIC COOLANT
                   BATCH
                    DUMP
                                              *»  DISCHARGE
TITANIUM
TUMBLING
WASTEWATER


SEDIMENTATION
L-9
®^
*
~i
                                                      SOLIDS TO
                                                       LANDFILL
                                                         DISCHARGE
            L-2. L-4
  TITANIUM
  SURFACE
 TREATMENT
   BATHS
  TITANIUM
  SURFACE
 TREATMENT
RINSEWATERS
BATCH
DUMP
 TITANIUM WET
 AIR POLLUTION
   CONTROL
        L-3, L-5, L-6
          L-8
                                       SLUDGE
                                      CONTRACT
                                       HAULED
             SLOWDOWN
                                               CAUSTIC
L-7
                                    PH
                               ADJUSTMENT
                                                                   DISCHARGE:
   SOURCE
 CITY WATER
                    L-1
                        FIGURE V-11

              WASTEWATER SOURCES AT PLANT L
                           1108

-------
" — "
| sepAcroflY METALS
1 TUMBLING WASTEWATER

' REFRACTORY METALS MOLTEN
1 SALT BATH
! REFRACTORY METALS MOLTEN
SALT RINSEWATER
,
'
REFRACTORY METALS
! BURNISHING WASTEWATER
1
! REFRACTORY METALS SURFACE
i : TREATMENT BATHS
! REFRACTORY METALS SURFACE
TREATMENT RINSEWATERS
1
! PRECIOUS METALS SURFACE
TREATMENT BATH
1 PRECIOUS METALS SURFACE
TREATMENT RINSEWATER
M-Z , erirp ' M'14
<^l '*" StUIMblMIAOON ' " ^> > **

BATCH CONTRACT
DUMP HAUVED
M-4
35
M3 '

05)
M ft '
BATCH ^ ^
DUMP ® *"

Q$J ^
i
BATCH
DUMP
M-5
09 *





I
(O) M-16
T

FLASH MIXING
V

SEDIMENTATION

®M-17

,r
DISCHARGE


                                                                                        ^-CAUSTIC
REFRACTORY METALS SAWING
 CONTACT COOLING WATER
   REFRACTORY METALS
 BURNISHING WASTEWATER
                          M-13
                                 CHILLER
                                               M"15 SLOWDOWN'
UNIT

SEDIMENTATION
"^


ii«t


2-STAGE
SEDIMEN-
TATION



CLOTH
FILTRA-

   REFRACTORY METALS
   DRAWING LUBRICANT
                        BATCH
                        DUMP
                                     CONTRACT
                                      HAULED
                                                                       DISCHARGE
                                                                                            M-15
I
! REFRACTORY METALS SURFACE
i TREATMENT BATH
I REFRACTORY METALS SURFACE
I TREATMENT RINSEWATER

REFRACTORY METALS WET
1 AIR POLLUTION CONTROL

i REFRACTORY MEALS MOLTEN
i SALT BATH
j REFRACTORY METALS MOLTEN
BATCH
DUMP
M-10
| '^1 SLOWDOWN
BATCH CONTRACT
DUMP *" HAULED
M-9
«\ 	 , BB
; LIME,
M-18 RUSTIC.
/£> H5?°«
	 & —
~T *
EQUALIZATION,
FLUORIDE
COMP'LEXATION.
RAPID MIXING,
SEDIMENTATION
SJ) M-19

REFRACTORY METALS
GRINDING EMULSION
   SOURCE CITY WATER
                        BATCH
                        DUMP
                              M-1
                                        CONTRACT
                                         HAULED
                             FIGURE V-12

                WASTEWATER SOURCES AT PLANT M
                                   1109

-------
REFRACTORY METALS
 EXTRUSION PRESS
 HYDRAULIC FLUID
     LEAKAGE
REFRACTORY METALS
   MOLTEN SALT
   RINSEWATER
REFRACTORY METALS
 SAWING, GRINDING
 CONTACT COOLING
      WATER
REFRACTORY METALS
  DYE PENETRANT
     TESTING
   WASTEWATER
 N-2
                           N-3
N-4
 N-5
                                                    DISCHARGE
 SOURCE CITY WATER
                           N-1
                             FIGURE V-13

                   WASTEWATER SOURCES AT PLANT N
                                1110

-------
REFRACTORY METALS
SURFACE TREATMENT
   RINSEWATER
                          0-2
DISCHARGE
SOURCE CITY WATER
                          0-1
                       FIGURE V-14

              WASTEWATER SOURCES AT PLANT 0
                           1111

-------
 ZIRCONIUM, HAFNIUM
 SURFACE TREATMENT
      BATHS
P-2, P-3
                  TO WASTEWATER
                    TREATMENT
DISCHARGE
SOURCE RIVER WATER
                           P-1
                             FIGURE V-15

                    WASTEWATER SOURCES AT PLANT P
                                  1112

-------
 MAGNESIUM
  SURFACE
 TREATMENT
   BATHS
MAGNESIUM
  SURFACE
TREATMENT
RINSEWATER
 NON-SCOPE
  PROCESS
WASTEWATER
BATCH
       Q-2, Q-5, Q-18
DUMPS
       Q-3, Q-4, Q-6, Q-7, Q-8, Q-9, Q-10
                                                             EQUALIZATION
                                                      Q-12, Q-14
                                                              CHROMIUM
                                                              REDUCTION
                                                               • S02
                                                               •H2 S04
                                                      Q-13
                                                             RAPID MIXING
                                                             --LIME
                                                             ---CAUSTIC
                                                             FLOCCULATION
                                                             -(-POLYMER
                                                            SEDIMENTATION
                                                            PH ADJUSTMENT
                                                               -H2 S04
                                                                    Q-15
                                                           POLISHING LAGOON
                                                                    Q-16
                                                              DISCHARGE
                                    FIGURE V-16

                          WASTEWATER SOURCES AT PLANT Q
                                        1113

-------
IN-SCOPE
NICKEL
•PROCESS
WASTEWATER

NON-SCOPE
WASTEWATER



 NON-SCOPE

WASTEWATER
                                  SODA ASH, POLYMER
                       R-1
 EQUALIZATION,
   MIXING
SEDIMENTATION
                                                     R „
                                             EQUALIZATION
           SEDIMENTATION  fcZ
                                            SAND FILTRATION
                                                    R-3
SOURCE RIVER
   WATER
                                              DISCHARGE
PRETREATED
NICKEL
PROCESS
WASTEWATER

PLANT SANITARY
WASTEWATER




CLAY, POLYMERS HYPOCHLOR


EXTENDED
AERATION


SEDIMEN-
TATION



CHLORI-
IMATION

                  R-5
                                                                    R-4
                                                                        DISCHARGE
                              FIGURE V-17

                    WASTEWATER SOURCES AT PLANT R
                                 1114

-------
    IRON
 METAL POWDER
  PRODUCTION
     WET
  ATOMIZATION
  WASTEWATER
 SEDIMENTATION
                                        COOLING
                                        TOWER
  SAND
FILTRATION
                                                BACKWASH
                                               WASTEWATER


                                                S-1
 NON-PROCESS
 WASTEWATER
   NICKEL
METAL POWDER
 PRODUCTION
     WET
 ATOMIZATION
 WASTEWATER
 NON-PROCESS
 WASTEWATER
  ^NON-SCOPE
   PROCESS
 WASTEWATER
                                      | SEDIMENTATION  |
                                               IS-2
  FABRIC
FILTRATION
               S-3
                                             NON-PROCESS
                                             WASTEWATER
                                                             1
                                      SEDIMENTATION
                      S-5
SOURCE CITY WATER {—	®
                                                                   S-4
                                                             DISCHARGE
                           FIGURE V-18

                 WASTEWATER SOURCES AT PLANT S;
                             1115

-------
IRON, COPPER,
   NICKEL
  PROCESS
WASTEWATER
NON-PROCESS
WASTEWATER
                             T-1
                                       SEDIMENTATION
                                                         T-2
DISCHARGE
 SOURCE CITY
   WATER
                      T-3
                                FIGURE V-19

                       WASTEWATER SOURCES AT PLANT T
                                   1116

-------
   URANIUM SAWING,
 GRINDING EMULSIONS
                                   FeSO*     ACTIVATED CARBON
                               CAUSTIC ^ V-12    I   «V-13
   'URANIUM AREA
CLEANING WASTEWATER
                     V-8.V-18,V-19
  URANIUM SURFACE
   TREATMENT BATH
  URANIUM SURFACE
TREATMENT RINSEWATER
BATCH
                     DUMP
                            V-3, V-4
t


\ION-CONTACT
PROCESS
WASTEWATER

SOURCE
CITY WATER
                       V-17

                   I	®
                        V-1
                                      EQUALIZATION
URANIUM WPT
AIR POLLUTION
, CONTROL

URANIUM DRUM
WASH WATER
& v"14
URANIUM HEAT
TREATMENT CONTACT
COOLING WATER
I
URANIUM LAUNDRY
i WASnWATcn

i

NON-SCOPE PROCESS
'WASTEWATER

A ^SLOWDOWN
V-5
\l Q
®,., 	 ljac

,V-15, V-16
BATCH
DUMPS """
V-7
— ?

HOLDING
TANK












I
LIME
1

,^ LIME
SLAKER ^



                                                     m
                                                                        V'10
                                                           PRECIPITATION,
                                                          SEDIMENTAT.ON
                                                        ACID
                                                                          FeSQ,, POLYMERS
                                                          pH ADJUSTMENT
                                                            DISCHARGE
                                 FIGURE V-21  ;

                      WASTEWATER SOURCES AT PLANT V


                                       1117

-------
REFRACTORY METALS MOLTEN
        SALT BATH
REFRACTORY METALS MOLTEN
     SALTRINSEWATER
                                 Z-4
                  2-3
REFRACTORY METALS ALKALINE
      CLEANING BATH
REFRACTORY METALS ALKALINE
  CLEANING AND SURFACE
  TREATMENT RINSEWATER
 REFRACTORY METALS WET
  AIR POLLUTION CONTROL
    NON-SCOPE PROCESS
       WASTEWATER
   SOURCE CREEK WATER
BATCH
                           DUMP
          Z-1
           BATCH
                                       DUMP
                              2-2
                                  Z-8
                                                              ±
                                                         HOLDING TANK
                                           2-5
                               MIXING TANK
.LIME
                                                           FILTRATION
                                                                      Z-6
                              HOLDING TANK
                                POLISHING
                                 LAGOON
                                                          pH ADJUSTMENT
                                                                            ACID
                                                                  2-7
                                                           DISCHARGE
                                   FIGURE V-25

                         WASTEWATER SOURCES AT PLANT Z
                                        1118

-------
                            SECTION VI
                SELECTION OF POLLUTANT PARAMETERS
The  Agency has studied nonferrous metals forming wastewaters  to
determine the presence or absence of priority,  conventional, and
selected nonconventional pollutants.  The priority and nonconven-
tional  pollutants  are subject to B'PT and BAT  effluent  limita-
tions,  as  well  as NSPS,  PSES,  and  PSNS.;  The  conventional
pollutants  are subject to BPT and BCT effluent  limitations,  as
well a:s NSPS. , ,                               :     -

One hundred and twenty-nine pollutants (known as the 129 priority
pollutants)  were  studied  pursuant, to the requirements  of  the
Clean Water Act of 1977 (CWA).  These pollutant parameters, which
are  listed in Table VI-1,  are members of the 65 pollutants  and
classeis   of  toxic pollutants referred to as Table 1 in  Section
307(a);(l) of the CWA.               ,

From the original list of .129 pollutants,  three pollutants  have
been  deleted in two separate amendments to 40 CFR Subchapter  N,
Part  401.   Dichlorodifluoromethane  and  trichlorofluoromethane
were deleted first (46 FR 2266,  January 8, 1981) followed by the
deletion  of bis-(chloromethyl) ether (46 FR 10723,  February  4,
1981).•        '.

Past  :studies  by  EPA and others  have  identified  many
nonpribrity,        nonconventional  pollutant  parameters useful
in    characterizing        industrial   wastewaters    and    in
evaluating    treatment    process        removal   efficiencies.
Certain   of  these  and  other  parameters-  may        also   be
selected    as   reliable  indicators  of   the    presence    of
specific  priority pollutants.   For these reasons,  a number  of
nonpribrity   pollutants  were  also studied  for the  nonferrous
metals ; forming category.             '.
      }                               i
The  conventional pollutants considered (total suspended  solids,
oil and grease,,  and pH) traditionally have been studied to char-
acterize industrial wastewaters   These parameters are especially
useful  in evaluating the effectiveness of  wastewater  treatment
processes.     '                                :
      !               .                I         =
Several nonconventional,  nonpriority pollutants were considered.
As  discussed in Section V,  raw wastewater samples were analyzed
for  the  following:     acidity,  alkalinity,  aluminum,  ammonia
nitrogen,  barium,  boron, calcium, chemical oxygen demand (COD),
chloride,  cobalt,  columbium,  fluoride,  gold, iron, magnesium,
manganese,  molybdenum,  nitrate,  phenolics,   phosphate,  phos-
phorus,  sodium, sulfate, tantalum, tin, titanium, total dissolved
solids ' (TDS),  total organic carbon (TOC),  total  solids  (TS),
tungsten,  uranium,  vanadium,  yttrium,  zirconium,   radium-226,
gross-alpha,    and   gross-beta.    Of   these   nonconventional
pollutants,   ammmonia,   fluoride,  gold,  and'  molybdenum  were
                               1119

-------
considered for limitation in particular subcategories,  since they
are found in significant concentrations in some nonferrous metals
forming  process  wastewater  streams  and  are  not  effectively
controlled simply by controlling the priority metal pollutants;.

RATIONALE FOR SELECTION OF POLLUTANT PARAMETERS

Exclusion of Toxic Pollutants

The  Settlement  Agreement in Natural Resources Defense  Council,
Inc.  vs.  Train,  8 ERC 2120 (D.D.C. 1976), modified 12 ERG 1833
(D.D.C.  1979), modified by orders of October 26, 1982, August 2,
1983,  January 6,  1984,  July 5, 1984 and January 7, 1985, which
preceded the Clean Water Act, contains provisions authorizing the
exclusion  from  regulation in certain  instances  of  particular
pollutants, categories, and subcategories.

Paragraph 8(a)(iii) of the Settlement Agreement allows the Admin-
istrator  to  exclude  from regulation  priority  pollutants  not
detectable  by Section 304(h) analytical methods or other  state-
of-the-art  methods.   Accordingly,  pollutants  that were  never
detected,  or that were never found above their analytical  quan-
tification level,  are excluded from regulation.   The analytical
quantification level for a pollutant is the minimum concentration
at  which  that  pollutant can be  reliably  measured.    For  the
priority pollutants in this study,  the analytical quantification
levels  are:   0.005 mg/1 for pesticides,  PCB's,  and beryllium;
0.010 mg/1 for antimony, arsenic, selenium, silver, thallium, '• and
the  remaining  organic  priority  pollutants;   0.020  mg/1  for
cadmium,  chromium,  cyanide,  and zinc;  0.050 mg/1 for  copper,
lead, and nickel; and 0.0002 mg/1 for mercury.

Since  there was no reason to expect TCDD (2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodi-
benzo-p-dioxin) in nonferrous metals forming process  water,  EPA
decided that maintenance of a TCDD standard in analytical labora-
tories  was too hazardous.   Consequently,  TCDD was analyzed  by
GC/MS  screening,  and  compared  to EPA's GC/MS  computer  file.
Samples  collected by the Agency's contractor were  not  analyzed
for  asbestos.   Asbestos is not expected to be a part of nonfer-
rous  metals forming wastewater since the category only  includes
metals  that have already been refined from any ores  that  might
contain  asbestos.   In  addition,  asbestos is not known  to  be
present in any process chemicals used in any forming operations.

Paragraph 8(a)(iii) also allows the Administrator to exclude from
regulation  priority pollutants detected in amounts too small  to
be  effectively reduced by technologies known to the  Administra-
tor.   Pollutants which were detected below levels considered  to
be   achievable  by  specific  available  treatment  methods  are
excluded.   For the priority metals,  the chemical precipitation,
sedimentation,  and filtration technology treatment effectiveness
values,  which are presented in Section VII were used.    For  the
priority organic pollutants detected above their analytical quan-
tification  level,  treatment effectiveness values for  activated
carbon  technology  were  used.   These  treatment  effectiveness


                               1120

-------
values  represent the most stringent treatment options considered
for  pollutant removal.   This allots for the  most  conservative
exclusion for;pollutants detected below treatable levels.

Treatment effectiveness concentrations and analytical quantifica-
tion concentrations are presented for the 129 priority pollutants
in Table VI-2i                       '         i

Paragraph  8(a)(iii)  allows  for  the exclusion  of  a  priority
pollutant  if it is detected in the source water of  the  samples
taken.

In addition to the provisions outlined above, Paragraph 8(a)(iii)
of  the  Settlement  Agreement (1) allows  the  Administrator  to
exclude .from  regulation priority pollutants detectable  in  the
effluent  from only a small number of sources within the subcate-
gory because they are uniquely related to those sources,  and (2)
allows  the  Administrator to exclude  from  regulation  priority
pollutants  which will be effectively controlled by the technolo-
gies upon whiqh are based other effluent limitations  guidelines,
or by .pretreatment standards.
      I                              i
Waste;streams in the nonferrous metals forming category have been
grouped •together  by the subcategorization scheme  described  in
Section  IV.   The pollutant exclusion procedure was applied  for
each of the following subcategories:;

      '      (1)  Lead-Tin-Bismuth Forming
      i  !    (2)  Magnesium Forming
      :      (3)  Nickel-Cobalt Forming
      :      (4)  Precious Metals Forming
      1      (5)  Refractory Metals Forming
            (6)  Titanium Forming
            (7)  Uranium Forming
            (8)  Zinc Forming
      i      (9)  Zirconium-Hafnium Forming
      |     (10)  Metal Powders

Priority  pollutants remaining after; the application of the above
exclusion  process  were selected Edr  further  consideration  in
establishing specific regulations.

DESCRIPTION OF POLLUTANT PARAMETERS

The  following discussion addresses pollutant parameters detected
above  their  analytical quantification level in  any  sample  of
nonferrous  metals forming wastewater.   The description of  each
pollutant provides the following information:   the source of the
pollutant;  whether it is a naturally occuring element, processed
metal,  or manufactured compound; general physical properties and
the  form  of the pollutant;  toxic effects of the  pollutant  in
humans and other animals; and behavior of the pollutant in a POTW
at   concentrations  that  might  be  expected  from   industrial
discharges.   ;
                               1121

-------
Acenaphthene   (1) .   Acenaphthene  ( 1, 2-dihydroacenaphthylene,  or
1, 8-ethylene-naphthalene)  is a polynuclear aromatic  hydrocarbon
(PAH)   with   molecular   weight  of  154  and  a   formula   of
Acenaphthene occurs in coal, tar produced during high  temperature
coking  of  coal.   It has been detected in cigarette  smoke  and
gasoline exhaust condensates.                                 !

The  pure compound is a white crystalline solid at room  tempera-
ture  with  a melting range of 95C to 97C and a boiling range  of
278C  to 280C.   Its vapor pressure at room temperature  is  less
than 0.02 mm Hg.   Acenaphthene is slightly soluble in water (100
mg/1), but even more soluble in organic solvents such as ethanol,
toluene,  and chloroform.  Acenaphthene can be oxidized by oxygen
or  ozone  in the presence of certain catalysts.   It  is  stable
under laboratory conditions.

Acenaphthene is used as a dye intermediate, in the manufacture of
some plastics, and as an insecticide and fungicide.

So  little  research has been performed on acenaphthene that  its
mammalian  and human health effects are virtually  unknown.   The
water  quality criterion of 0.02 mg/1 is recommended  to  prevent
the  adverse effects on humans due to the organoleptic properties
of acenaphthene in water.

No  detailed study of acenaphthene behavior in a POTW  is  avail-
able.   However, it has been demons tratd that none of the organic
toxic  pollutants studied so far can be broken down by biological
treatment processes as readily as fatty acids,  carbohydrates, or
proteins.   Many of1 the toxic pollutants have been  investigated,
at  least in laboratory-scale studies,  at concentrations  higher
than  those  expected  to be contained by most  municipal  waste-
waters.   General  observations relating molecular  structure  to
ease  of  degradation  have been developed for all of  the  toxic
organic pollutants .

The conclusion reached by study of the limited data is that  bio-
logical  treatment produces little or no degradation of  acenaph-
thene.   No  evidence is available for drawing conclusions  about
its possible toxic or inhibitory effect on POTW operation.

Its  water  solubility  would allow acenaphthene present  in  the
influent to pass through a POTW into the effluent.  The hydrocar-
bon character of this compound makes it sufficiently  hydrophobic
that adsorption onto suspended solids and retention in the sludge
may  also be a significant route for removal of acenaphthene from
the POTW.

Acenaphthene has been demonstrated to affect the growth of plants
through  improper  nuclear division  and  polyploidal  chromosome
number.   However,  it  is not expected that land application  of
sewr. ge  sludge containing acenaphthene at the low  concentrations
 Men  are  to  be expectd in a POTW sludge would result  in ; any


                               1122                          :

-------
adverse effects on,animal& .ingesting plants grown in such soil.

Acrolfein  (2)«   The  available data for acrolein  indicate  that
acute  and chronic toxicity to freshwater aquatic life  occur  at
concentrations as low as 0.068 and 0.021 mg/1,  respectively, and
would; occur at lower concentrations among species that are  more
sensitive than those tested.        ,
      i               •               ' .   •      I
For   the protection of human health ;from the  toxic-properties  of
acrolein  ingested  through contaminated aquatic  organisms,  the
ambient water criterion is determined to be 0.320. mg/1.   For the
protection of human health from the toxic properties of  acrolein
ingested  though contaminated aquatic organisms alone,  the  ambi
ent water criterion is determined to be 0.780 mg/1.

Acroleisin has a wide variety of applications.  'It is used directly
as a biocide for aquatic weed control;  for algae, weed, and mol-
lusk  !control in recirculating process water  systems;  for  slime
control  in  the  paper industry;  and to  protect  liquid  fuels
against  microorganisms.   Acrolein  is  also.used  directly  for
crosslinking  protein collagen in leather tanning and for  tissue
fixation in histological samples.  It is widely used as an inter-
mediate in the chemical industry.   Its dimer,  which is prepared
by  a 'thermal,;  uncatalyzed reaction,  has several  applications,
including use as an intermediate for crosslinking agents,  humec-
tants,;  plasticizers,  polyurethane intermediates, copolymers and
homopolymers, and Greaseproofing cotton.  The monomer is utilized
in  synthesis via the Diels-Alder reaction as a dienophile  or  a
diene.   Acrolein  is  widely used ih copolymerization,  but-  its
homopolymers do not appear commercially important.   The  copoly-
mers of acrolein are used in photography,  for textile treatment,
in  the  paper [industry,  as builders in laundry  and  dishwasher
detergents,  and  as coatings for aluminum and steel  panels,  as
well  as other; applications.   In 1975,  worldwide production was
about 59 kilotons.   Its largest market was for methionine  manu-
facture.   Worldwide capacity was estimated at 102 kilotons/year,
of whilch U.S. capacity was 47.6 kilotons/year.

Acrolein  (2-propenal)  is a liquid with a structural formula  of
CH2   =  CHCHO.and. a molecular weight of 56.07.    It melts at .-
86.95C,  boilsiat 52.5 to 53.5C,  and has a. density of 0.8410  at
20C.  !  The   vapor   pressure at 20C is 215  mm  Hg,   and   its
water  solubility is 20.8 percent by weight at 20C.

A flammable liquid with a pungent odor,  acrolein is an  unstable
compound  that undergoes polymerization to the plastic solid dis-
acryl,!  especially  under light or in the presence, of  alkali  or
strongi  acid.   It is the simplest member of  the class of unsatu-
rated aldehydes, and the extreme reactivity of acrolein is due to
the  presence  of a vinyl group (H2C=H-) and an  aldehyde   group
on such a small molecule.   Additions to the carbon-carbon double
bond of acrolein are catalyzed by acids and bases.   The addition
of halogens to this carbon-carbon double bond proceeds readily.

Acrolein  can  enter  the aquatic environment by its  use  as  an


                               1123

-------
aquatic herbicide,  from industrial discharge, and from the chlo-
rination  of  organic compounds in wastewater and drinking  water
treatment.   It is often present in trace amounts in foods and is
a component of smog,  fuel combustion,  wood,  and possibly other
fire, and cigarette smoke.  An evaluation of available data indi-
cates that, while industrial exposure to manufactured acrolein is
unlikely,  acrolein  from nonmanufactured sources  is  pervasive.
Acrolein  exposure will occur through food ingestion and  inhala-
tion.   Exposure through the water or dermal route is less likely
However ,  analysis of municipal effluents of Dayton,  Ohio showed
the  presence of acrolein in six of 11 samples,  with  concentra-
tions ranging from 0.020 to 200 mg/1.
Benzene ( 4 ) .  Benzene (CsHg) is a clear, colorless liquid
obtained  mainly  from 'petroleum feedstocks by several  different
processes.   Some is recovered from light oil obtained from  coal
carbonization gases.  It boils at 80C and has a vapor pressure of
100  mm Hg at 26C.   It is slightly soluble in water (1.8 g/1  at
25C)  and  it  dissolves in hydrocarbon  solvents.   Annual  U.S.
production is three to four million tons.                     ;

Most of the benzene used in the U.S.  goes into chemical manufac-
ture.   About half of that is converted to ethylbenzene which \ is
used to make styrene.  Some benzene is used in motor fuels.

Benzene  is harmful to human health,  according to numerous  pub-
lished  studies.   Most studies relate effects of inhaled benzene
vapors.   These effects include nausea,  loss of muscle coordina-
tion,  and excitement, followed by depression and coma.  Death is
usually the result of respiratory or cardiac failure.   Two  spe-
cific  blood disorders are related to benzene exposure.   One  of
these,  acute  myelogenous  leukemia,  represents a  carcinogenic
effect of benzene.  However, most human exposure data is based on
exposure  in occupational settings and benzene carcinogenesis  is
not considered to be firmly established.

Oral  administration . of benzene to laboratory  animals  produced
leukopenia,  a  reduction in number of leukocytes in  the  blood.
Subcutaneous injection of benzene-oil solutions has produced sug-
gestive, but not conclusive, evidence of benzene carcinogensis .

Benzene  demonstrated teratogenic effects in laboratory  animals,
and mutagenic effects in humans and other animals.           :

For maximum protection of human health from the potential carcin-
ogenic  effects of exposure to benzene through ingestion of water
and contaminated aquatic organisms,  the ambient water concentra-
tion  should  be zero.   Concentrations of benzene  estimated  to
result in additional lifetime cancer risk at levels of  10~~ , :
10~6,   and  10~5  are  0.00015  mg/1,   0.0015  mg/1,  and  0.015
mg/1, respectively.

Some studies have been reported regarding the behavior of benzene
in  a  POTW.   Biochemical oxidation of benzene under  laboratory
conditions,  at concentrations of 3 to 10 mg/1,  produced 24, 27,


                               1124                          :

-------
24, and 20 percent degradation in 5, 10, 15, and 20 days, respec-
tively,  using unacclimated seed cultures in fresh water.  Degra-
dation of 58,  67,  76,  and 80 percent was produced in the  same
time periods using acclimated seed cultures.   Other studies pro-
duced similar results.  The EPA's most recent study of the behav-
ior of' toxic organics in a POTW indicates that benzene is 78 per-
cent removed.   Other reports indicate that most benzene entering
a  POTW is removed to the sludge and that influent concentrations
of 1 g/1 inhibit sludge digestion.  There is no information about
possible effects of benzene on crops grown in soils amended  with
sludge! containing benzene.                    :

Benzidine  (5).   Benzidine (NH2(CsH4)2NH2) is  a
grayish-yellow,  white  or reddish-gray crystalline  powder.   It
melts at 127C (260F), and boils at 400C (752F).  This chemical is
soluble  in  hot water,  alcohol,  and ether,  but only  slightly
soluble in water.   It is derived by:   (a) reducing nitrobenzene
with zinc dust in an alkaline solution followed by  distillation;
(b)  the electrolysis of nitrobenzene,  followed by distillation;
or, .(c)  the nitration of diphenyl followed by reduction of  the
product with zinc dust in an alkaline solution,  with  subsequent
dis  tillation.   It  is  used in the synthesis of a  variety  of
organic   chemicals,   such  as  stiffening  agents   in   rubber
compounding.

Available  data indicate that benzidine is acutely toxic to fresh
water  aquatic  life at•concentrations as low as  2.50  mg/1  and
would  |occur at lower concentrations among species that are  more
sensitive than .those tested.  However, no data are available con-
cerning  the  chronic toxicity to sensitive freshwater  and  salt
water aquatic life.                  ;
       I                    i

For  the  maximum protection of human health from  the  potential
carcinogenic  effects due to exposure: to benzidine,  through  the
ingestion  of contaminated water and contaminated aquatic  organ-
isms,   the ambient water concentration should be  zero.   Concen-
trations  of  this  pollutant estimated to result  in  additional
lifetime  cancer  risk at levels  of  10",   10~~6,   and
10~7  are 0.0000012 mg/1,   0.00000012 mg/1,  and 0.000000012
mg/1,  respectively.

With respect to treatment in POTWs, laboratory studies have shown
that  benzidine is amenable to treatment via  biochemical  oxida-
tion.   The expected 30-day average treated effluent concentration
is 0.025 mg/1.                       ]
       i

Carbon ' Tetrachloride (6).    Carbon tetrachloride  (CC14),  also
called tetrachloromethane, is a colorless liquid produced primar-
ily  by the.chlorination of hydrocarbons - particularly  methane.
Carbon  tetrachloride boils at 77C and has a vapor pressure of 90
mm Hg at 20C.   It is slightly soluble in water (0.8 g/1 at  25C)
and soluble in many organic solvents.  Approximately one-third of
a millicpn tons is produced annually in the U.S.:

Carbon tetrachloride, which was displaced by perchloroethylene as

       i                               i
       !                        1125

-------
a  dry  cleaning agent in the 1930's,  is used principally as  an
intermediate for production of chlorofluoromethanes for refriger-
ants,  aerosols,  and blowing agents.  It is also used as a grain
fumigant.                                                     :

Carbon  tetrachloride  produces  a variety of  toxic  effects  in
humans.  Ingestion of relatively large quantities — greater than
five grams — has frequently proved fatal.   Symptoms are burning
sensation  in  the mouth,  esophagus,  and stomach,  followed  by
abdominal pains, nausea, diarrhea, dizziness, abnormal pulse, and
coma.   When death does not occur immediately,  liver and  kidney
damage are usually found.   Symptoms of chronic poisoning are not
as well defined.    General fatigue,  headache,  and anxiety have
been  observed,  accompanied  by digestive tract and kidney  dis-
comfort or pain.

Data concerning teratogenicity and mutagenicity of carbon  tetra-
chloride are scarce and inconclusive.  However, carbon tetrachlo-
ride  has  been  demonstrated to be  carcinogenic  in  laboratory
animals.  The liver was the target organ.                     ;

For maximum protection of human health from the potential carcin-
ogenic effects of exposure to carbon tetrachloride through inges-
tion  of  water and contaminated aquatic organisms,  the  ambient
water  concentration should be zero.   Concentrations  of  carbon
tetrachloride  estimated to result in_additional lifetime  cancer
risk   at   risk levels of 10~7,   10~6,   and   10~5
are 0.000026 mg/1, 0.00026 mg/1, and 0.0026 mg/1, respectively.

Many  of the toxic organic pollutants have been investigated,  at
least in laboratory-scale studies,  at concentrations higher than
those expected to be found in most municipal wastewaters. General
observations have b'een developed relating molecular structure  to
ease of degradation for all of the toxic organic pollutants.  The
conclusion   reached  by  study  of  the  limited  data  is  that
biological  treatment  produces a moderate degree of  removal  of
carbon  tetrachloride  in  a  POTW.    No  information  was  found
regarding the possible interference of carbon tetrachloride  with
treatment processes.  The EPA's most recent study of the behavior
of  toxic organics in a POTW indicates that carbon  tetrachloride
is  50 percent removed.   Based on the water solubility of carbon
tetrachloride,  and  the vapor pressure of this compound,  it  is
expected  that some of the undegraded carbon  tetrachloride  will
pass through to the POTW effluent and some will be volatilized in
aerobic processes.

1,1,1-Tfichloroethane (11).   1,1,1-Trichloroethane is one of the
two possible trichlorethanes.  It is manufactured by hydrochlori-
nating vinyl chloride to 1,1-dichloroethane which is then chlori-
nated to'the desired product.   1,1,1-Trichloroethane is a liquid
at  room temperature with a vapor pressure of 96 mm Hg at 20C and
a  boiling  point  of 74C.    Its formula  is  CC13CH3.    It  is
slightly  soluble  in  water (0.48 g/1) and is  very  soluble  in
organic solvents.   U.S.  annual production is greater than  one-
third of a"million tons.
                               1126

-------
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
degreasing agent.
   is  used  as \ an  industrial  solvent  and
Most  human  toxicity data for 1,1,1-trichloroethane  relates  to
inhalation  and dermal exposure routes.   Limited data are avail-
able for determining toxicity of ingested  1,1,1-trichloroethane,
and those data:are all for the compound itself,  not solutions in
water.   No data are available regarding its toxicity to fish and
aquatic  organisms.   For the protection of human health from the
toxic .properties of 1,1,1-trichloroethane ingested  through  the
comsumption  of  water and fish,  the ambient water criterion  is
15.7  mg/1.   The  criterion is based on bioassays  for  possible
carcinogenicity.                     :
      '                         '      !         -
Biochemical oxidation of mamy of the toxic organic pollutants has
been  investigated,  at  least in laboratory  scale  studies,  at
concentrations  higher than commonly expected in municipal  waste
water.;  General observations relating molecular structure to ease
of  degradation have been developed for all of these  pollutants.
The  ccanclusion  reached by study of these limited data  is  that
biological treatment produces a moderate degree of degradation of
1,1,1-trichloroethane.  No'evidence is available for drawing con-
clusions  about its possible toxic or inhibitory effect  on  POTW
operation.   Hqwever, for degradation to occur/ a fairly constant
input of the compound would be necessary.
      i
Its  water solubility would allow 1,1,1-trichloroethane,  present
in   the  influent and not biodegrada'ble,   to pass  through   a
POTW       into   the  effluent.    The  Agency  s   most  recent
study   of   the       behavior  of  toxic  organics in  a   POTW
indicates   that  1,1,1-trichlorethane  is  87  percent  removed.
One  factor   which  has      received some  attention,   but  no
detailed  study,   is the volatilization of the  lower  molecular
weight organics from a  POTW.   If   ;   1,1,1-trichloroethane  is
not  biodegraded,   it   will   volatilize       during  aeration
processes in the POTW.   It has been demonstrated      that  none
of the toxic organic pollutants of this type  can  be      broken
down  by  .biological  treatment  processes as  readily  as  fatty
acids, carbohydrates, or proteins.   ',

I,1-Dichloroethane (13).  1,1-Dichlorpethane, also called ethyli-
dene  dichloride and ethylidene chloride,  is a colorless  liquid
manufactured by reacting hydrogen chloride with vinyl chloride in
1,1-dichloroethane  solution in the presence of a catalyst.   How
ever,  it is reportedly not manufactured commercially in the U.S.
1,1-Dichloroethane  boils at 57C and has a vapor pressure of  182
mm Hg at 20C.  ; It is slightly soluble in water (5.5 g/1 at  20C)
and very soluble in organic solvents.

1,1-Dichloroethane  is  used as an extractant for  heat-sensitive
substances and as a solvent for rubber and silicone grease.
1,1-Dichloroethane
ethane)>  but  its
is less toxic than its isomer  (1,2-dichloro-
use  as an anesthetic has  been  discontinued
                               1127

-------
because  of marked excitation of the heart.   It  causes  central
nervous system depression in humans.  There are insufficient data
to derive water quality criteria for 1,1-dichloroethane.

Many  of the toxic organic pollutants have been investigated,  at
least in laboratory scale studies,  at concentrations higher than
those  expected  to be contained by most  municipal  wastewaters.
General  observations  have  been  developed  relating  molecular
structure  to  ease of degradation for all of the  toxic  organic
pollutants.   The conclusion reached by study of the limited data
is that biological treatment produces only a moderate removal  of
1,1-dichloroethane  in  a POTW by degradation.   The  EPA's  most
recent  study  of the behavior of toxic organics in a POTW  indi-
cates that 1,1-dichloroethane is 76 percent removed.

The  high  vapor pressure of 1,1-dichloroethane  is  expected  to
result  in  volatilization of some of the compound  from  aerobic
processes in a POTW.  Its water solubility will result in some of
the  1,1-dichloroethane  which  enters the POTW  leaving  in  the
effluent from the POTW.

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane    (15).      1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
(CHC12CHC12)  is  a  heavy,   colorless,   mobile,  nonflammable,
corrosive, toxic liquid.  While it has a chloroform-like odor, it
is  more  toxic  than chloroform.   It is soluble in  alcohol '• or
ether,  but insoluble in water.   It has no flash point, boils at
146.5C  (296P) and has a vapor pressure of 5 mm Hg at  20.7C,.  It
results  from  the interaction of acetylene  and  chlorine,  with
subsequent distillation.   This chemical is used in organic  syn-
thesis, as a solvent, and for metal cleaning and degreasing.

Available  freshwater data indicate that acute toxicity occurs at
concentrations of 9.32 mg/1,  and that chronic toxicity occurs at
4.000  mg/1.    Available  saltwater  data  indicate  that  acute
toxicity occurs at 9.020 mg/1.

For  the  maximum protection of human health from  the  potential
carcinogenic  effects-  due to  exposure  to  1,1,2,2-tetrachloro-
ethane,  through  contaminated  water  and  contaminated  aquatic
organisms,  the ambient water concentration should be zero.  Con-
centrations  of this pollutant estimated to result in  additional
lifetime  cancer risk at risk levels of 10
                                          -5
10 '    are   0.0017 mg/1,   0.00017   mg/1,
mg/1, respectively.
  10~b
and
 and
0.000017
                               1128

-------
With respect to treatment in POTW,  laboratory studies have shown
that  1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane is not amenable to treatment  via
biochemical oxidation.   As this pollutant is insoluble in water,
any removal of'this pollutant which would occur in a POTW,  would
be related to physical treatment processes.

Para-chloro-meta-cresol   22).
	 	                              Para-chloro-meta-cresol
(CICyHgOH)   is ^thought to be a  4-chloro-3-methyl-phenol
(4-chloro-meta-cresol,  or  2-chloro-5-hydroxy-toluene),  but  is
also  used  by  some authorities to refer  to  6-chloro-3-methyl-
phenoll  (6-chloro-meta-cresol,   or  4-chloro-3-hydroxy-toluene),
depending on whether the chlorine is considered to be para to the
methyl;or to the hydroxy group.   It is assumed for the  purposes
of this document that the subject compound is 2-chloro-5-hydroxy-
toluene.   This compound is a colorless crystalline solid melting
at  66  to 68C.   It is slightly soluble in water (3.8  g/1)  and
soluble  in  organic solvents.   This phenol reacts with  ,4-amino
antipyrene to give a colored product and therefore contributes to
the   nonconventional  pollutant  parameter   designated   "Total
Phenols."    No  information on manufacturing methods  or  volumes
produced was found.                  ;

Para-chloro-meta cresol (abbreviated here as PCMC) is marketed as
a microbicide, and was proposed as an antiseptic and disinfectant
more tljian 40 years ago.  It is used in glues, gums, paints, inks,
textiles,  and leather, goods.         '
      i                        •       •         :
Although  no human toxicity data are available for PCMC,  studies
on  laboratory  animals have demonstrated that this  compound  is
toxic tyhen administered subcutaneously and intravenously.   Death
was  preceded by severe muscle tremors.   At high dosages  kidney
damage!  occurred.   On the other hand,  an unspecified isomer  of
chlorocresol,  presumed to be PCMC, is used at a concentration of
0.15 percent to preserve mucous heparin, a natural product admin-
istered intravenously as an anticoagulant.   The report does  not
indicate the total amount of PCMC typically received.   No infor-
mation '  was found regarding possible teratogenicity,  or carcino-
genicity of PCMC.                    ',
      ['        :            '   -     ~  *         ' ' '
Two   reports  indicate  that  PCMC  undergoes   degradation   in
biochemical  oxidation 'treatments carried out at  concentrations
higher '•  than  are expected to be encountered in  POTW  influents.
One  study  showed   50 percent degradation in 3.5 hours  when  a
phenol4adapted  acclimated seed culture was used with a  solution
of 60 mg/1 PCMC.  The other study showed 100 percent  degradation
of  a 120  mg/1  solution  of  PCMC in two weeks  in  an  aerobic
activated   sludge   test  system.     No   degradation  of  PCMC
occurred under  anaerobic  conditions.
                                          The  EPA's most .recent
study of the.behavior of  toxic
that PGMC is 89 percent removed.
                                     organics in a POTW indicates
Chloroform (23).   Chloroform, also called trichloromethane, is a
colorle;ss  liquid  manufactured commercially by  chlorination  of
methane.  Careful control of conditions maximizes chloroform pro-
duction,  but other products must be separated.  Chloroform boils
                               1129

-------
at   61C  and  has a vapor pressure of 200 mm Hg at  25C.   It  is
slightly  soluble in water  (8.22 g/1 at 20C) and readily  soluble
in organic solvents.

Chloroform is used as a solvent and to manufacture  refrigerants,
Pharmaceuticals, plastics, and anesthetics.  It is seldom used ;as
an anesthetic.

Toxic  effects  of chloroform on humans include  central  nervous
system depression,  gastrointestinal irritation, liver and kidney
damage and possible cardiac sensitization to adrenalin.  Carcino-
genicity  has  been  demonstrated for  chloroform  on  laboratory
animals.

For  the  maximum protection of human health from  the  potential
carcinogenic  effects of exposure to chloroform through ingestion
of  water and contaminated aquatic organisms,  the ambient  water
concentration  should  be  zero.   Concentrations  of  chloroform
estimated  to  result in additional lifetime cancer risks at  the
levels of 10~7,  10~6,  and 10~5 were 0.000021  mg/1,
0.00021 mg/1, and 0.0021 mg/1, respectively.
The  biochemical  oxidation of this compound was studied  in  one
laboratory  scale  study  at  concentrations  higher  than  those
expected to be contained by most municipal wastewaters.  After 5,
10r  and 20 days no degradation of chloroform was observed.   The
conclusion  reached is that biological treatment produces  little
or no removal by degradation of chloroform in a POTW.

The  high vapor pressure of chloroform is expected to  result  in
volatilization  of the compound from aerobic treatment steps in a
POTW.   Remaining chloroform is expected to pass through into the
POTW  effluent.   In addition,  the most recent EPA study of  the
behavior of toxic organics in a POTW indicates that chloroform is
61 percent removed.

3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine (28).    3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine  (DCB)  or
dichlorobenzidine(4,4'-diamino-3,3'-dichlorobiphenyl)  is used  in
the  production • of dyes and pigments and as a curing  agent  for
polyurethanes.   Th^  molecular formula of  dichlorobenzidine  is
C12H10C12N2 and the molecular weight is 253.13.

DCB  forms brownish needles with a melting point of 132 to  133C.
It  is readily soluble in alcohol,  benzene,  and glacial  acetic
acid,  slightly  soluble in HC1,  and sparingly soluble in  water
(0.7 g/1 at 15C).   When combined with ferric chloride or bleach-
ing powder, a green color is produced.

The  affinity  of DCB for suspended particulates in water is  not
clear;  its  basic nature suggests that it may be fairly  tightly
bound to humic materials in soils.  Soils may be moderate to long
term reservoirs for DCB.

Pyrolysis  of  DCB will most likely lead to the release  of  HC1.
Because of the halogen substitution,   DCB compounds probably bio-
                               1130

-------
degrade at a slower, rate than benzidine alone.
try  of  DCS is not completely known.   DCB may
benzidine.    ;       .
                                                 The photochemis-
                                                 photodegrade  to


Assuming the clean air concentrations of ozone (2 x 10~9) and
an  average atmospheric concentration of hydroxyl radicals  (3  x
10~15 ';MJ",  the: half life for oxidation of DCB by either  of
these ; chemical , compounds is on the order of one and one  to  10
days,  .respectively.   Furthermore,  assuming  a  representative
concentration  of  10    M for  peroxy  radicals  in   sunlit
oxygenated water,  the half-life for oxidation by these compounds
is approximately 100 days, given the;variability of environmental
conditions.               :           ;
      I    ..

The  data  base available for dichlorobenzidines  and  freshwater
organisms  is  limited to one test on bioconcentration  of  3,3'-
dichloirobenzidine.   No statement can be made concerning acute or
chronic toxicity of this pollutant.

No  saltwater organisms have been tested with any  dichlorobenzi-
dine;  no  statement  can  be made concerning  acute  or  chronic
toxicity for that pollutant on saltwater organisms.

For  the  maximum protection of human health from  the  potential
carcinogenic effects due to exposure of dichlorobenzidine through
Ingestion  of contaminated water and ^contaminated aquatic  organ-
isms, the ambient water concentration should be zero based on the
non-threshold assumption for this chemical.   However, the levels
that  may result in incremental increase of cancerrisk over  the
lifetime  were 'estimated at 10 5 ,  10~6 ,  and 10~7.
The      corresponding  recommended  criteria are 0.000103  mg/1,
0.00003,      m9/1 and 0.000001 mg/1,  respectively.  If the above
estimates are  ','-•   made  for  consumption  of  aquatic  organisms
only,    excluding       consumption  of water,   the levels  are
0.000204    mg/1,    0.000020       mg/1,   and  0.000002   mg/1,
respectively.              ;

1,1-Dichloroethylene (29).   1,1-Dichloroethylene (1,1-DCE), also
called Vinylidene chloride,   is a clear colorless liquid manufac-
tured  |by dehydirochlorination of 1,1,2-trichloroethane.   1,1-DCE
has  trie  formula  CC12CH2-     It has a  boiling  point  of  32C,
and  a vapor pressure of 591 mm Hg at 25C.   1,1-DCE is  slightly
soluble  in  water  (2.5 mg/1) and is  soluble  in  many  organic
solvents.  U.S.;  production  is  in  the  range  of  hundreds  of
thousands of tons annually.,    •      ,
       i   '   ,  i
1,1-DCE  is  used as a chemical intermediate  and  for  copolymer
coatings or films.   It may enter the wastewater of an industrial
facility  as the result of decomposition of  1,1,1-trichloroethy-
lene used in decreasing operations,  or by migration from vinyli-
dene  chloride  copolymers ejxposed to the process  water.   Human
toxicity of i;i-DCE has not been demonstrated;  however,  it is a
suspected  human  carcinogen.   Mammalian toxicity  studies  have
focused  on  the  liver and kidney damage  produced  by  1,1-DCE.
                               1131

-------
Various changes occur in those organs in rats and mice  ingesting
1,1-DCE.

For  the  maximum protection of human health from  the  potential
carcinogenic  effects of exposure to 1,1-dichloroethylene through
ingestion of water and contaminated aquatic organisms,  the ambi-
ent  water concentration is zero.   The concentration of  1,1-DCE
estimated to result in an additional lifetime cancer risk of 1: in
100,000 is 0.0013 mg/1.   '                                    \

Under laboratory conditions, dichloroethylenes have been shown to
be  toxic to fish.   The primary effect of acute toxicity of  the
dichloroethylenes  is depression of the central  nervous  system.
The  octanol/water partition coefficient of 1,1-DCE indicates i it
should not accumulate.significantly in animals.

Biochemical oxidation of many of the toxic organic pollutants has
been  investigated in laboratory scale studies at  concentrations
higher  than would normally be expected in municipal wastewaters-
General  observations  relating molecular structure  to  ease  of
degradation have been developed for all of these pollutants.  The
conclusion  reached by study of the limited data is that biologi-
cal treatment produces little or no degradation of  1,1-dichloro-
ethylene.  No evidence is available for drawing conclusions about
the possible toxic or inhibitory effect of 1,1-DCE on POTW opera-
tion.  Because of water solubility, 1,1-DCE which is not volatil-
ized or degraded is expected to pass through a POTW.  Very little
1,1-DCE is expected to be found in sludge from a POTW.

The  most recent EPA study of the behavior of toxic organics in a
POTW indicates that 1,1-DCE is 80 percent removed.  The very high
vapor  pressure  of 1,1-DCE is expected to result in  release: of
significant percentages of this material to the atmosphere in any
treatment involving aeration.  Degradation of dichloroethylene in
air is reported to occur, with a half-life of eight weeks.
                                                              i
2,4-Dimethylphenol  (34).    2,4-Dimethylphenol  (2,4-DMP),  also
called  2,4-xylenol/  is a colorless,  crystalline solid at  room
temperature (25C),  but melts at 27C to 28C.  2,4-DMP is slightly
soluble  in water and,  as a weak acid,  is soluble  in  alkaline
solutions.   Its  vapor  pressure  is less than 1 mm Hg  at  room
temperature.

2,4-DMP  is a natural product,  occurring in coal  and  petroleum
sources.  It is used commercially as an intermediate for manufac-
ture of pesticides,  dye stuffs, plastics and resins, and surfac-
tants.  It is found in the water runoff from asphalt surfaces. It
can  find  its way into the wastewater of a  manufacturing  plant
from any of several adventitious sources.

Analytical  procedures specific to this compound are used for, its
identification and quantification in wastewaters.   This compound
does  not  contribute  to "Total Phenols" determined  by  the  4-
aminoantipyrene method.
                               1132

-------
Three , methylphenol  isomers  (creso,ls)  and  six  dimethylphenol
isomers (xylertols) generally occur together in natural  products,
industrial processes/  commercial products,  and phenolic wastes.
Therefore,  data  are not available ,for human exposure to 2,4-DMP
alone.  In addition to this, most mammalian tests for toxicity of
individual  dimethylphenol  isomers  have  been  conducted   with
isomers other than 2,4-DMP.
                                    :

In general,  the mixtures of phenol,  methylphenols, and dimethyl
phenols  contain  compounds  which produced  acute  poisoning  in
laboratory  animals.   Symptoms were difficult  breathing,  rapid
muscular  spasms,  disturbance of motor coordination,  and  asym-
metric^l  body position.   In a 1977 National Academy of  Science
publication  the  conclusion was reached that,  "In view  of  the
relative  paucity of data on the  mutagenicity,  carcinogenicity,
teratogenicity,  and  long  term oral toxicity  of  2,4-dimethyl-
phenol!,  estimates of the effects of; chronic oral exposure at low
levels;  cannot  be made with any confidence."  No  ambient  water
quality  criterion can be set at this time.   In order to protect
public: health,  exposure to this compound should be minimized  as
soon as possible.                   ;

Toxicity  data for fish and freshwater aquatic life are  limited;
however,  in  reported  studies of 2,4-dimethylphenol at  concen-
trations as high as 2 mg/1 no adverse effects were observed.

Biological  degradability of 2,4-DMP as determined in one  study,
showed^  94.5  percent  removal based on  chemical  oxygen  demand
(COD).I   Another study determined that persistance of 2,4-DMP  in
the  environment  is  low,  and thus any of  the  compound  which
remained  in  the  sludge  or passed through the  POTW  into  the
effluent  would  be  degraded  within  moderate  length  of  time
(estimated as two months in the report).   The EPA's most  recent
study  of the behavior of toxic organics in a POTW indicates that
2,4-DMP is 59 percent removed.                :

As a weak acid, the behavior of 2,4-DMP may be somewhat dependent
on the|pH of the influent to the POTW.   However, over the normal
limited range of POTW pH, little effect of pH would be expected.
      I                     ,          i
2,4-Dinitrotoluene   (35). !   2,4-Dinitrotoluene  [(N02)2
CQ  H4'CH3],    a  yellow  crystalline  compound,  is
manufactured  as a coproduct with the 2,6-isomer by nitration  of
nitrotoluene.  i It melts at 71C.  2,4-Dinitrotoluene is insoluble
in  water  (0.27 g/1 at 22C) and soluble in a number  of  organic
            Production  data  for the 2,4-isomer  alone  are  not
             The 2,4-and 2,6-isomers are manufactured in an 80:20
           ratio,  depending on the process  used.   Annual  U.S.
            production  is  about 150 thousand tons  of  the  two
          Unspecified amounts are produced by the U.S. government
solvents.
available.
or  65s35
commercial
isomers.
and  further nitrated to trinitrotoluene (TNT) for military  use.
The  major use of the dinitrotoluene mixture is for production of
toluene diisocyanate used to make polyurethanes.  Another use  is
in.production of dyestuffs.
                               1133

-------
The  toxic  effect of 2,4-dinitrotoluene in humans  is  primarily
methemoglobinemia  (a blood condition hindering oxygen  transport
by the blood).   Symptoms depend pn-severity of•the disease,  -but
include cyanosis,  dizziness,  pain in joints,'headache, and loss
of appetite in workers inhaling the compound.  Laboratory.animals
fed  oral doses of 2,4-dinitrotoluene exhibited many of the  same
symptoms.  Aside from the effects in red/blood cells, effects 'rare
observed in the nervous system and testes^         ,

Chronic  exposure to 2,4-dinitrotoluene.may produce liver  damage
and  reversible anemia.   No data were.found on teratogenicity of
this  compound.   Mutagenic data are limited and,are regarded  as
confusing.   Data  resulting from studies of  carcinogenicity  of
2,4-dinitrotoluene  point to a need for' further testing for  this
property.                                     :                !

For  the  maximum protection of human health from  the  potential
carcinogenic  effects  of exposure to 2,4-dinitrotoluene .through
ingestion of water and contaminated aquatic organisms,  the ambi-
ent water concentration should be zero.   Concentrations of  2,4-
dinitrotoluene  estimated toresult in additional lifetime cancer
risk   at  risk levels of 10~7  10~6 and  10~5    are         :  .
0.0074 mg/1, 0.074 mg/1, and 0.740 mg/1, respectively.

Data  on  the behavior of 2,4-dinitrotoluene in a  POTW  are  not
available.   However,  biochemical oxidation of 2,4-dinitrophenol
was  investigated  on a laboratory scale.   At 100 mg/1  of  2,4-
dinitrotoluene,  a  concentration  considerably higher than  that
expected  in municipal wastewaters,  biochemical oxidation by  an
acclimated,  phenol-adapted  seed  culture  produced  52  percent
degradation  in three hours.   Based on this limited  information
and general observations relating molecular structure to.ease  of
degradation  for  all the toxic organic pollutants,  it was  con-
cluded  that biological treatment in a POTW removes  2,4-dinitro-
toluene  to  a  high degree or  completely.   No .information  is
available  regarding possible interference by ;2,4-dinitrotoluene
in  POTW  treatment processes,  or on  the  possible  detrimental
effect  on  sludge  used to amend soils in;which food  crops  are
grown.                                     ;

2,6-Dinitrotoluene  (36).  .  2,6-Dinitr9tpluene   [(N©2)2
Cg  H4  CH3],   a  yellow  crystalline  compound,- is
manufactured  as a coproduct with the 2,4-isomer by nitration , of
nitrotoluene.   It melts at 71C.  2,6-Dini.trotoluene is. insoluble
in  water  (0.27 g/1 at 22C) and soluble in a number  of  organic
            Production  data  for  the 2,6-isomer alone  ,are  ;not
            The 2,4- and 2,6-isomers"are manufactured in an 80:20
           ratio,  depending ,on the process -used.   Annual  U.S.
            production  is  about 150 thousand tons  of  the  two
isomeirs.  Unspecified amounts are produced by the U.S. government
and  further nitrated to trinitrotoluene (TNT)'for military  use.
The major use of the dinitrotoluene mixture,is for production  of
toluene  diisocyanate used to make polyurethan.es.  Another use .is
in production of dyestuffs.         , • ^ .   .                  . • .'
solvents.
available.
or  65:35
commercial
                               1134

-------
Data  on  the behavior of 2,6-dinitrotoluene in a  POTW  are  not
available.   However,  biochemical  Qxidation of the 2,4-dinitro-
toluene  isomer was investigated in a laboratory scale.   At  100
mg/1 of 2,4-dinitrotoluene,,  a concentration considerably  higher
than  that expected in municipal wastewaters,  biochemical oxida-
tion  by an acclimated,  phenol-adapted seed culture produced  52
percent degradation in three hours.  Based on this limited infor-
mation'  and general observations relating molecular structure  to
ease of degradation for all the toxic organic pollutants,  it was
concluded  that biological treatment in a POTW. removes  2,4-dini-
trotoluene to a high degree.   It is not known if ths  conclusion
can  be  expanded to include the 2,6-isomer.  'No information  is
available  regarding possible interference by  2,6-dinitrotoluene
in  POTW  treatment processes,  or on  the  possible  detrimental
effect  on  sludge  used to amend soils in which food  crops  are
growno        !                       ;

Ethylbenzene (38).  Ethylbenzene is a colorless, flammable liquid
manufactured  commercially from benzene and  ethylene.   Approxi-
mately half of the benzene used in the U.S.  goes into the  manu-
facture of more than three million tons of ethylbenzene annually.
Ethylbenzene boils at 136C and has a .vapor pressure of 7 mm Hg at
20C.  ;it  is slightly soluble in water (0.14 g/1 at 15C) and  is
very soluble in organic solvents.

About  98 percent of the ethylbenzene; produced in the  U.S.  goes
into  the  production of styrene,  much of which is used  in  the
plastics and synthetic rubber industries.   Ethylbenzene is a cdn-
stituerit  of xylene mixtures used as diluents in the paint indus-
try, agricultural insecticide sprays, and gasoline blends.

Although  humans  are exposed to ethylbenzene from a  variety  of
sources  in  the environment,  little information on  effects  of
ethylbenzene  in  man or animals is  available.    Inhalation  can
irritate eyes, affect the respiratory tract, or  cause vertigo. In
laboratSory  animals ethylbenzene exhibited low  toxicity.   There
are no idata available on teratogenicity,  mutagenicity,  or  car-
cinogeriicity of ethylbenzene.        ,
       !        ,                      I
Criteria  are  based  on data derived  from  inhalation  exposure
limits.;   For the protection of human health from the toxic prop-
erties ; of  ethylbenzene ingested through water  and  contaminated
aquatic:  organisms,  the ambient water quality criterion  is  1.1
mg/1.                      '  •     '   !

Laboratory  scale studies of the biochemical oxidation of  ethyl-,
benzene; at concentrations greater than would normally be found in
municipal wastewaters have demonstrated varying  degrees of degra-
dation.    In  one study with phenol-acclimated seed cultures,  27
percent degradation was observed in a half day at 250 mg/1 ethyl-
benzene.   Another study at unspecified conditions showed 32, 38,
and  45; percent degradation after 5,  10,   and 20  days,  respec-
tively.   Based on these results and general observations relating
molecular  structure of degradation,  the conclusion was  reached
                               1135

-------
that  biological  treatment  produces only
ethylbenzene in a POTW by degradation.
moderate  removal  of
Other  studies  suggest that most of the ethybenzene  entering  a
POTW  is  removed from the aqueous stream  to  the  sludge.   The
ethylbenzene  contained  in the sludge removed from the POTW  may
volatilize.

In addition,  the most recent EPA study of the behavior of  toxic
organics  in  POTW indicates that ethylbenzene  is  approximately
84 percent removed.

Fluoranthene (39).  Fluoranthene (1, 2-benzacenaphthene) is one of
the compounds called polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH).   A
pale yellow solid at ^ room temperature, it melts at 111C and' has a
negligible  vapor pressure at 25C.   Water solubility is low (0.2
mg/1).  Its molecular formula is
Fluoranthene,  along with many other PAH's,  is found  throughout
the  environment.   It  is  produced by pyrolytic  processing  of
organic raw materials,  such as coal and petroleum,  at high tem-
perature (coking processes).  It occurs naturally as a product of
plant  biosyntheses.    Cigarette  smoke  contains  f luoranthene.
Although it is not used as the pure compound in industry,  it has
been found at relatively higher concentrations (0.002 mg/1)  than
most  other PAH's in at least one industrial  effluent.   Further
more,  in  a  1977 EPA survey to determine levels of PAH in  U.S.
drinking water supplies,  none of the 110 samples analyzed showed
any PAH other than f luoranthene.

Experiments  with laboratory animals indicate  that  fluoranthene
presents  a  relatively low degree of toxic potential from  acute
exposure,  including oral administration.   Where death occurred,
no information was reported concerning target organs or  specific
cause of death.                                               i

There  is  no  epidemiological  evidence to  prove  that  PAH  in
general,  and  fluoranthene,  in particular,  present in drinking
water are related to the development of cancer.  The only studies
directed toward determining carcinogenicity of fluoranthene  have
been  skin tests on laboratory animals.   Results of these  tests
show  that fluoranthene has no activity as a complete  carcinogen
(i.e.,  an  agent which produces cancer when applied by  itself),
but exhibits significant cocarcinogenicity (i.e.,  in combination
with a carcinogen, it increases the carcinogenic activity) .

Based  on the limited animal study data,  and following an estab-
lished procedure,  the ambient water quality criterion for fluor-
anthene  alone (not in combination with other PAH) is  determined
to be 200 mg/1 for the protection of human health from its  toxic
properties.

There  are  no  data on the chronic effects  of  fluoranthene ! on
freshwater  organisms.   One saltwater invertebrate shows chronic
toxicity  at  concentrations below 0.016 mg/1.   For  some  fresh
                               1136

-------
water  fish species the concentrations producing  acute  toxicity
are substantially higher, but data are very limited.
       F                              ' -
Results  of  studies of the behavior of fluoranthene  in  conven-
tional' sewage, treatment  processes found in a  POTW  have  been
published.   Removal of fluoranthene during primary sedimentation
            to  be  62 to 66 percent (from an  initial  value  of
             O.:04435 mg/1 to a final lvalue of 0.00122  to  0.0146
             the  removal was 91 to 99 percent:(final  values  of
             0.00026  mg/1) after  biological  purification  with
was  found
0.00323  to
mg/1), ': and
0.00028  to
activated sludge processes.

A reviejw was made of data on biochemical oxidation of many of the
toxic organic pollutants investigated in laboratory scale studies
at  concentrations  higher  than would normally  be  expected  in
municipal wastewaters.   General observations relating  molecular
structure  to ease of degradation have been developed for all  of
•these pollutants.  The conclusion reached by study of the limited
data  is that biological treatment produces little or no degrada-
tion of fluoranthene.   The same study,  however,  concludes that
fluoranthene would be readily removed by filtration and oil-water
separation and other methods which rely on water insolubility, or
adsorption on other particulate surfaces.  This latter conclusion
is  supported by the previously cited study  showing  significant
removal by primary sedimentation.

No  studies were found to give data on either the possible inter-
ference of fluoranthene with POTW operation,  or the  persistance
of  fluoranthene  in sludges or POTW  effluent  waters.   Several
studies! have documented the ubiquity of fluoranthene in the envi-
ronment1  and it cannot be readily determined if this results from
persistence  of anthropogenic fluoranthene or the replacement  of
degraded  fluoranthene by natural processes such as  biosynthesis
in plants.                           i
       i                    '          " '
Methylene Chloride (44).  Methylene chloride, also called dichlo-
romethane  (CH2C12),   is  a  colorless  liquid  manufactured  by
chlorination of methane or methyl chlpride.followed by separation
from  the  higher  chlorinated  methanes  formed  as  coproducts.
Methylene chloride boils at 40C,  and has a vapor pressure of 362
mm Hg at 20C.  ,It is slightly soluble in water (20 g/1 at  20C),
and very soluble.in organic solvents.   U.S. annual production is
about 250,000 tons'.

Methylene chloride is a common industrial solvent found in insec-
ticides •, metal cleaners, paint, and paint and varnish removers.
       i        ;         '             I      :    :        '
Methylene  chloride is not generally regarded as highly toxic  to
humans.  Most human toxicity data are,for exposure by inhalation.
Inhaled;  methylene  chloride;  acts as a  central  nervous  system
depressant.   There  is  also evidence that the  compound  causes
heart failure when large amounts are inhaled.

Methylene  chloride  does  produce  mutation in  tests  for  this
effect.|   In  addition,  a bioassay recogni2ed for its  extremely
                               1137

-------
high sensitivity to strong and weak carcinogens produced  results
which  were marginally significant.   Thus potential carcinogenic
effects  of methylene chloride are not confirmed or  denied,  but
are  under  continuous study.   These studies  are  difficult  to
conduct for two reasons.   First,  the low boiling point (40C) of
methylene chloride makes it difficult to maintain the compound at
37C during incubation.   Secondly, all impurities must be removed
because  the  impurities themselves may be  carcinogenic.   These
complications also make the test results difficult to interpret.

For  the protection of human health from the toxic properties  of
methylene  chloride  ingested  through  water  and   contaminated
aquatic organisms, the ambient water criterion is 0.002 mg/1. The
biochemical  oxidation  of  this  compound  was  studied  in  one
laboratory  scale  study  at  concentrations  higher  than  those
expected  to be contained by most municipal  wastewaters.   After
five days no degradation of methylene chloride was observed.  The
conclusion  reached is that biological treatment produces  little
or no removal by degradation of methylene chloride in a POTW.

The  high  vapor  pressure of methylene chloride is  expected  to
result  in volatilization of the compound from aerobic  treatment
steps  in a POTW.   It has been reported that methylene  chloride
inhibits anaerobic processes in a POTW.   Methylene chloride that
is  not volatilized in the POTW is expected to pass through  into
the effluent.                                                 :

The  most  recent  EPA study of POTW removal  of  toxic  organics
indicates  that  methylene chloride is approximately  58  percent
removed.

Methyl    Chloride   (45) .     Methyl  chloride  (CHsCl)  is    a
colorless,  noncorrosive liquifiable gas which is transparent  in
both  the  gaseous and liquid states.   It has a  faintly  sweet,
ethereal  odor.   It  boils  at -23.1C (-11F).   It  is  slightly
soluble  in  water  (by which it is decomposed)  and  soluble  in
alcohol,  chloroform,  benzene, carbon tetrachloride, and glacial
acetic acid.  It is derived by:  (a) the chlorination of methane;
and,  (b) the action of hydrochloric acid on methanol,  either in
vapor or liquid phase.   It is used as an extractant and solvent,
as  a pesticide,  in the synthesis of organic chemicals,  and  in
silicones.

The  available data for this- pollutant indicate that  acute  tox-
icity  to freshwater aquatic life occurs at concentrations as low
as 11.0 mg/1.   No data are available concerning this pollutant's
chronic  toxicity  to sensitive  freshwater  aquatic  life.   The
available data for this pollutant indicate that acute and chronic
toxicities  to saltwater aquatic life occur at concentrations  as
low  as 12.0 mg/1 and 6.40 mg/1,  respectively.   With respect to
saltwater  aquatic  life,  a decrease in algal cell  numbers  was
found to occur at concentrations as low as 11.5 mg/1.

For  the  maximum protection of human health from  the  potential
carcinogenic effects due to exposure to this  pollutant,  through
                               1138

-------
the  ingestion of contaminated water and aquatic, organisms,  the
ambient  water concentration should be zero.   Concentrations  of
in  additional  lifetime  cancer  this   pollutant _estimated  to
result,  risks  at risk levels of 10^5 10~6 and  10~7
are 0.0019 mg/1, 0.00019 mg/1, and 0.000019 mg/1, respectively.
      1    •    '              '        '.         -   '
Concerning treatment in POTW,  laboratory studies have shown that
methyl   chloride  is not amenable tp treatment  via  biochemical
oxidation.    :   ,     '  ,    ,        , '              '.....'

Chlorodibromomethane  (51).
	   51).   Chlorodibromomethane  (CHBr2Cl)  is
a clea'r, colorless, heavy liquid.  it boils at 116C (241F).  This
pollutant.. is used in the synthesis of various organic compounds.
              r                      1       -
The  available data for this .pollutant indicate that  acute  tox-
icity  to freshwater aquatic life occurs at concentrations as low
as 11.0 mg/1.   No data are available concerning this pollutant's
chronic  toxicity  to sensitive  freshwater  aquatic  life.   The
available, data for this pollutant indicate that acute and chronic
toxicities  to saltwater aquatic life occur at concentrations  as
low  as 12..0 mg/1 and 6.40 mg/1,  respectively.   With respect to
saltwater  aquatic  life,  a decrease in algal cell  numbers  was
found to occur at concentrations as ^Low as 11.5 mg/1.
     "I        '            . ' ••        I  '  •      '        .'
For  the  maximum protection of human health from  the  potential
carcinogenic effects due to exposure;to this  pollutant,  through
the  ingestion of contaminated water and aquatic  organisms,  the
ambient  water concentration should be. zero.   Concentrations  of
this  pollutant estimated to resultfiin,additional lifetime cancer
risks  at risk; levels'of 10.  ,  10~6r  and  10 '  are
0.0019! mg/1, 0.00019 mg/1, and 0.000019 mg/1, respectively.
With  respect to treatment in POTW, ', laboratory studies  indicate
that  this pollutant is not'amenable!to treatment via biochemical
oxidation.    ,                      :,

Naphthalene  (55).   Naphthalene is an aromatic hydrocarbon  with
two  orthocondensed  benzene  rings and a  molecular  formula  of
C10H8-:    As  such  it  is  properly'classed  as  a   polynuclear
aromatic   hydrocarbon  (PAH).   . Pute  naphthalene  is  a  white
crystalline  solid  melting  at 80C.   For  a  solid,  it  has  a
relatively high vapor pressure (0.05 mm Hg at 20C),  and moderate
water  solubility  (19  mg/1 at 20C),    Napthalene  is  the  most
abundant single component of coal tar.   Production is more than a
third bf a million tons annually in the U.S.  About three fourths
of  the  production is used as feedstock for  phthalic  anhydride
manufacture.    Most   of  the  remaining  production  goes  into
manufacture   of   insecticide,    dyestuffs,    pigments,    and
Pharmaceuticals.     Chlorinated   and   partially   hydrogenated
naphthalenes are used in some solvent mixtures,.   Naphthalene  is
also used as a:moth repellent.    .  •
                                    I    '      ~  •
Naphthalene,  ingested  by humans,  has reportedly caused  vision
loss (cataracts),  hemolytic anemia, iand occasionally, renal dis-
ease. .;  These  effects of naphthalene ingestion are confirmed  by
                               1139

-------
studies  on laboratory animals.   No carcinogenicity studies  are
available which can be used to demonstrate carcinogenic  activity
for  naphthalene.   Naphthalene  does bioconcentrate  in  aquatic
organisms.

For  the protection of human health from the toxic properties  of
naphthalene  ingested  through  water  and  through  contaminated
aquatic  organisms,  the ambient water criterion is determined to
be 143 mg/1.

Only a limited number of studies have been conducted to determine
the effects of naphthalene on aquatic organisms.   The data  from
those studies show only moderate toxicity.

Biochemical oxidation of many of the toxic organic pollutants has
been  investigated in laboratory scale studies at  concentrations
higher  than would normally be expected in municipal wastewaters.
General  observations  relating molecular structure  to  ease  of
degradation have been developed for all of these pollutants.  The
conclusion  reached by study of the limited data is that biologi-
cal treatment produces a high removal by degradation of  naphtha-
lene.  One recent study has shown that microorganisms can degrade
naphthalene,  first to a dihydro compound, and ultimately to car-
bon dioxide and water.

Naphthalene  has been detected in sewage plant effluents at  con-
centrations  up to 0.022 mg/1 in studies carried out by the  U.S.
EPA.   Influent  levels were not reported.   The most recent  EPA
study  of  the behavior of toxic organics in POTW indicates  that
naphthalene is approximately 61 percent removed.
Nitrobenzene  (56).    Nitrobenzene  (CgH5NO2),  also      called
nitrobenzol  and  oil  of mirbane,   is  a  pale   yellow,   oily
liquid,  manufactured  by reacting benzene with nitric  acid  and
sulfuric  acid.   Nitrobenzene  boils  at 210C and  has  a  vapor
pressure  of 0.34 mm Hg at 25C.   It is slightly soluble in water
(1.9  g/1 at 20C),   and is miscible with most organic  solvents.
Estimates of annual U.S. production vary widely, ranging from 100
to 350 thousand tons.                                         ',

Almost the entire volume of nitrobenzene produced (97 percent) is
converted to aniline,  which is used in dyes, rubber, and medici-
nals.   Other uses for nitrobenzene include:  solvent for organic
synthesis, metal polishes, shoe polish, and perfume.          :

The  toxic effects of ingested or inhaled nitrobenzene in  humans
are  related  to  its action  in  blood:   methemoglobinemia  and
cyanosis.  Nitrobenzene administered orally to laboratory animals
caused degeneration of heart,  kidney,  and liver tissue;   para-
lysis; and death.  Nitrobenzene has also exhibited teratogenicity
in laboratory animals,  but studies conducted to determine  muta-
genicity  or  carcinogenicity  did  not reveal  either  of  these
properties.
                               1140

-------
For  the  prevention of adverse effects due to  the  organoleptic
properties of nitrobenzene in water, the criterion is 0.030 mg/1.

Data ;on the behavior of nitrobenzene in POTW are not  available.
However,  laboratory  scale studies.have been; conducted  at  con-
centrations  higher than those expected to be found in  municipal
wastewaters. ;Biochemical oxidation produced no degradation after
5,  10, and 20 days.  A second study also reported no degradation
after 28 hours,  using an acclimated, phenol-adapted seed culture
with nitrobenzene at 100 rag/1.   Based on these limited data, and
on  general observations relating molecular structure to ease  of
biological  oxidation,  it is concluded that little or no removal
of nitrobenzene occurs during biological treatment in POTW.   The
low water solubility and low vapor pressure of nitrobenzene  lead
to the expectation that nitrobenzene will be removed from POTW in
the effluent and by volatilization during aerobic treatment.
2-Nitrophenol (57) .   2-Nitrophenol
called  ortho-nitrophenol,  is a li
manufactured  commercially by hydro
with ; aqueous; sodium hydroxide.   2
has  a  vapor  pressure of 1 mm  Hg
slightly soluble in water (2.1 g/1
solvents.   This  phenol  does not
aminoantipyrene,   and  therefore
nonconventional pollutant parameter
production is,5,000 to 8,000 tons.
 (NO2C6H40H), also
ght yellow crystalline  solid,
lysis of 2-chloro-nitrobenzene
-Nitrophenol melts at 45C  and
  at  49C.;   2-Nitrophenol  is
at 20C) and soluble in organic
react to give a color with  4-
does  not  contribute  to  the
 "Total Phenols."  U.S. annual
The  principal  use of ortho-nitrophenol is to synthesize  ortho-
aminophenol,  ortho-nitroanisole,  and other dyestuff  intermedi-
ates.                    ,          •

The  toxic  effects  of  2-nitrophenol on humans  have  not  been
extensively  studied.   Data  from :experiments  with  laboratory
animals indicate that exposure to this compound causes kidney and
liver;  damage.   Other  studies indicate that the  compound  acts
directly on cell membranes,  and inhibits certain enzyme  systems
in  vlitro.   No information regarding potential teratogencity was
found'.   Available data indicate that this compound does not pose
a  mutagenic hazard to humans.   Very limited data  for  2-nitro-
phenol do not reveal potential carcinogenic effects.

The  available data base is insufficient to establish an  ambient
water  criterion for protection of human health from exposure  to
2-nitrophenol.   No  data are available on which to evaluate  the
adverse effects of 2-nitrophenol on1aquatic life.
     !                              •                         :
Data ion the behavior of 2-nitrophenol in POTW were not available.
However,  laboratory-scale studies have been conducted at concen-
trations  higher  than  those expecjbed to be found  in  municipal
wastewater.  ' Biochemical  oxidation using adapted cultures  from
various  sources produced 95 percent degradation in three to  six
days  in  one study.   Similar results were  reported  for  other
studies.   Based on these data, and, general observations relating
molecular  structure  to  ease of  biological  oxidation,•  it  is
                               1141

-------
expected  that 2-nitrophenol will be biochemically oxidized to  a
lesser  extent  than domestic sewage by biological  treatment  in
POTW.

4-Nitrophenol (58)   4-Nitrophenol (NO2CeH4OH), also      called
paranitrophenol,   . is  a  colorless  to  yellowish   crystalline
solid  manufactured  commercially  by  hydrolysis  of   4-chloro-
nitrobenzene with aqueous sodium hydroxide.    4-Nitrophenol melts
at  114C.  Vapor pressure is not cited in the  usual sources.   4--
Nitrophenol  is  slightly soluble in water (15 g/1  at  25C)  and
soluble in organic solvents.   This phenol does not react to give
a color with 4-aminoantipyrene, and therefore  does not contribute
to the nonconventional pollutant parameter "Total Phenols."  U.S.
annual production is about 20,000 tons.

Paranitrophenol is used to prepare phenetidine, acetapheneticiine,
azo and sulfur dyes, photochemicals, and pesticides.

The toxic effects of 4-nitrophenol on humans have not been exten-
sively  studied.   Data from experiments with  laboratory  animals
indicate that exposure to this compound results in  methemoglobi-
nemia,   shortness   of  breath,   and  stimulation  followed  by
depression.   Other  studies  indicate  that   the  compound  acts
directly on cell membranes,  and inhibits certain enzyme  systems
in vitro.   No information regarding potential teratogenicity was
found.   Available data indicate that this compound does not pose
a  mutagenic  hazard  to  humans.    Very  limited  data  for  4-
nitrophenol   do  not  reveal  potential  carcinogenic   effects,
although  the  compound has been selected by the national  cancer
institute for testing under the Carcinogenic Bioassay Program.

No U.S.  standards for exposure to 4-nitrophenol in ambient water
have been established.

Data  on the behavior of 4-nitrophenol in a POTW are  not  avail-
able.   However,  laboratory scale studies have been conducted at
concentrations  higher than those expected to  be found in munici-
pal  wastewaters.    Biochemical oxidation using adapted  cultures
from various sources produced 95 percent degradation in three  to
six  days in one study.   Similar results were reported for other
studies.   Based  on  these data,  and  on  general  observations
relating molecular structure to ease of biological oxidation, ,it
is  concluded  that  complete or nearly complete  removal  of  4-
nitrophenol occurs during biological treatment in a POTW.

4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol  (60).   4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol  (DNOC)  is:  a
yellow  crystalline solid derived from o-cresol.   DNOC melts  at
85.8C and has a vapor pressure of 0.000052 mm Hg at 20C.   DNOC is
sparingly soluble in water (100 mg/1 at 20C), while it is readily
soluble- in  alkaline  aqueous  solutions,  ether,  acetone,  and
alcohol.  DNOC is produced by sulfonation of o-cresol followed;by
treatment with nitric acid.

DNOC is used primarily as a blossom thinning agent on fruit trees
and  as  a fungicide,  insecticide,   and miticide on fruit  trees


                               1142   •

-------
during the dormant season.   It is highly toxic to plants in  the
growing stage.   DNOC is not manufactured in the U.S. as an agri-
cultural  chemical.   Imports have been decreasing recently  with
only 30,000 Ibs being imported in 1976.

While  DNOC is highly toxic to plants,  it is also very toxic  to
humans and is considered to be one of the more dangerous agricul-
tural'  pesticides.   The  available literature concerning  humans
indicates  that  DNOC may be absorbed in  acutely  toxic  amounts
through  the respiratory and gastrointestinal tracts and  through
the  skin,  and  that it accumulates in the blood.   Symptoms  of
poisoning  include  profuse sweating,  thirst,  loss  of  weight,
headache, malaise, and yellow staining to the skin, hair, sclera,
and conjunctiva.

There is no evidence to suggest that DNOC is.  teratogenic,  muta-
genic!,  or carcinogenic.  The effects of DNOC in the human due to
chronic  exposure are basically the:same as those effects result-
ing from acute exposure    Although DNOC is considered.a  cumula-
tive ; poison  in humans,  cataract formation is the only  chronic
effect  noted in any human or experimental animal study    It  is
believed  that DNOC accumulates in the human body and that  toxic
symptoms may develop when blood levels exceed 20 mg/kg.

For  the protection of human health from the toxic properties  of
dinitro-o-cresol ingested through water and contaminated  aquatic
organisms, the ambient water criterion is determined to be 0.0134
mg/1.   If  contaminated  aquatic organisms alone  are  consumed,
excluding  the consumption of water,  the ambient water criterion
is determined to be 0.765 mg/1.   N<3 data are available on  which
to   evaluate;   the  adverse  effects   of   4,6-dinitro-o-cresol
on aquatic life.

Some studies have been reported regarding the behavior of DNOC in
POTW.   Biochemical oxidation of DNOC under laboratory conditions
at a concentration of 100 mg/1 produced 22 percent degradation in
3.5  hours,  using acclimated phenol adapted seed  cultures.   In
addition,  the  nitro group in the number 4 (para) position seems
to impart a destabilizing effect on^the molecule.  Based on these
data and general conclusions relating molecular structure to bio-
chemical oxidation, it is expected that 4,6-dinitro-o-cresol will
be biochemically oxidized to a lesser extent than domestic sewage
by biological treatment in POTW.   \

N-nitrosodiphenylamine  (62).    N-nitrosodiphenylamine  [(Cs
135)2  NNO],  also  called  nitrous  diphenylamide,  is  a  yellow
crystalline  solid manufactured by nitrosation of  diphenylamine.
It melts at 66C and is insoluble in water, but soluble in several
organic solvents other than hydrocarbons.  Production in the U.S.
has  japproached/1,500 tons per year.   The compound is used as  a
retarder  for rubber vulcanization and as a pesticide for control
of scorch (a fungus disease of plants).

N-nitroso  compounds  are acutely toxic to every  animal  species
tested and are also poisonous to humans.   N-nitrosodiphenylamine


     :        ;                  1143:

-------
toxicity in adult rats lies in the mid range of the values for 60
N-nitroso compounds tested.   Liver damage is the principal toxic
effect.   N-nitrosodiphenylamine,  unlike  many other  N-nitroso-
amines, does not show mutagenic activity.  N-nitrosodiphenylamine
has  been  reported by several investigations to be  non-carcino-
genic.   However  in  a  recent  study  by  the  National  Cancer
Institute,  the  compound  was  found  to  induce  a  significant
incidence of urinary bladder tumors in both male and female rats.
Few urinary bladder tumors were observed in mice,  although there
was  a  high incidence of  non-neoplastic  bladder  lesions.   In
addition,  N-nitrosodipheylamine  is capable of trans-nitrosation
and  could  thereby  convert  other  amines  to  carcinogenic  N-
nitrosoamines.   Sixty-seven  of 87 N-nitrosoamines studied  were
reported  to  have  carcinogenic  activity.    No  water  quality
criterion have been proposed for N-nitrosodiphenylamine.

No  data are available on the behavior of  N-nitrosodiphenylamine
in  a POTW.   Biochemical oxidation of many of the toxic  organic
pollutants have been investigated,  at least in laboratory  scale
studies,  at concentrations higher than those expected to be con-
tained in most municipal wastewaters.   General observations have
been  developed relating molecular structure to ease of  degrada-
tion  for  all  the toxic  organic  pollutants.   The  conclusion
reached by study of the limited data is that biological treatment
produces  little  or  no removal of N-nitrosodiphenylamine  in  a
POTW.   No information is available regarding possible  interfer-
ence  by  N-nitrosodiphenylamine  in POTW processes,  or  on  the
possible  detrimental  effect on sludge used to  amend  soils  in
which crops are grown.   However,  no interference or detrimental
effects  are expected because N-nitroso compounds are widely dis-
tributed  in the soil and water environment,  at  low  concentra-
tions,   as   a  result  of  microbial  action  on  nitrates  and
nitrosatable compounds.

N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine (63).   No physical properties or usage
data  could be found for this pollutant.   It can be formed  from
the interaction of nitrite with secondary and tertiary amines :

The  available data for this pollutant indicate that  acute  tox-
icity  to freshwater aquatic life occurs at concentrations as low
as 5.85 mg/1.   No data are available concerning this pollutant's
chronic toxicity to freshwater and saltwater aquatic  life.   The
available  data indicate that acute toxicity to saltwater aquatic
life occurs at concentrations as low as 3,300 mg/1.

For  the  maximum protection of human health from  the  potential
carcinogenic effects due to exposure to this  pollutant,  through
the  ingestion  of contaminatd water and aquatic  organisms,  the
ambient  water concentration should be zero.   Concentrations  of
this pollutant estimated to result in additional lifetime  cander
risks  of  risk levels of 10~ ,  10  ,  and 10~'  are
0.00016 mg/1, 0.000016 mg/1, and 0.0000016 mg/1, respectively.
                               1144

-------
 With  : r.espect  to  treatment  in  POTW, ;  laboratory  studies   indicate
 that  jthis  pollutant  is  not  amenable'to  treatment via   biochemical
 oxidation.

 Pentachlorophenol   (64).    Pentachlorophenol   (CgClsOH)   is    a
 white  crystalline solid produced  commercially by chlorination  of
 phenol or  polychlorophenols.   U.S.  annual  production  is  in  excess
 of  20,000  tons.   Pentachlorophenol.melts  at  190C and is slightly
 soluble in water  (14 mg/1).  Pentachlorophenol is not detected  by
 the  4-aminoantipyrene  method  and  so does  not contribute to the
 nonconventional pollutant parameter  "Total Phenols".
      !                              |
 Pentachlorophenol is a bactericide'and fungicide and is used for
 preservation of wood and wood  products.   .It  is  competitive with
 creosote in that  application*    It  is also used  as a  preservative
 in  glues,   starches, and photographic papers.  It is  an  effective
 algicide and herbicide.             ;

 Although data  are available on the  human toxicity effects of pen-
 tachlorophenol,   interpretation of  data is frequently uncertain.
 Occupational   exposure  observations must  be  examined  carefully
 because exposure to pentachlorophenol  is  frequently   accompanied
 by  exposure to other wood preservatives    Additionally,  experi-
 mental  results   and occupational  exposure observations  must   be
 examined  carefully  to  make sure that observed effects  are pro-
 duced  by  the  pentachlorophenol itself  and not by the by-products
 which usually  contaminate pentachlorophenol.

 Acute  and chronic toxic effects of  pentachlorophenol in   humans
 are  similar;   muscle  weakness,   headache,  loss of  appetite,
 abdominal  pain,   weight loss,   and  irritation of skin,   eyes, and
 respiratory tract.   Available literature indicates  that   penta-
 chlorophenol   does not  accumulate  in body  tissues to  any signifi-
 cant   extent.   Studies on  laboratory animals of distribution   of
 the compound in body tissues showed  the highest  levels of   penta-
 chlorophenol in liver,  kidney, and intestine,   while the  lowest
 levels were in brain, fatr  muscle,  and  bone.

 Toxic•  effects of pentachlorophenol;in  aquatic organisms are much
 greater at pH 6 where this weak  acid  is   predominantly in the
 undissociated  form  than at pH 9  where the ionic  form  predomi-
 nates.  Similar  results   were observed  in  mammals   where oral
 lethal  doses:of  pentachlorophenol  were lower when the  compound
 was  administered in. hydrocarbon solvents  (un-ionized form)  than
 when  jit  was•administered  as  the  sodium salt (ionized  form)   in
 water.                   ,      •    |

 There appear to be no significant  teratogenic, mutagenic, or car-
 cinogenic  effects of pentachlorophenol.

 For  the protection  of  human health  from the  toxic properties   of
 pentachlorophenol ingested  through  water and  through  contaminated
 aquatic organisms,   the ambient water quality criterion  is  deter-
• mined to be 0.140 mg/1.                       /
                                1145

-------
Some data are available on the behavior of pentachlorophenol in a
POTW.   Pentachlorophenol  has  been found in the influent  to:  a
POTW.   In  a  study of one POTW the mean removal was 59  percent
over a seven day period.  Trickling filters removed 44 percent at
the influent pentachlorophenol, suggesting that biological degra-
dation occurs.   The same report compared removal of pentachloro-
phenol at the same plant and two additional POTW facilities on,  a
later  date  and obtained values of 4.4,  19.5 and  28.6  percent
removal,  the last value being for the plant which was 59 percent
removal in the original study.  Influent concentrations of penta-
chlorophenol  ranged from 0.0014 to 0. 0046 mg/1 .   Other studies?
including the general review of data .relating molecular structure
to biological oxidation,  indicate that pentachlorophenol is  noh
removed  by biological treatment processes in a POTW.   Anaerobic
digestion processes are inhibited by 0.4 mg/1  pentachlorophenol.
The  most recent EPA study of the behavior of toxic organics in a
POTW indicates that pentachlorophenol is 52 percent removed.  :

The low water solubility and low volatility of  pentachlorophenol
lead  to the expectation that most of the compound will remain in
the sludge in a POTW.  The effect on plants -grown on land treated
with pentachlorophenol-containing sludge is unpredictable.   Lab-
oratory studies show that this compound affects crop  germination
at  5.4 mg/1.   However,  photodecomposition of pentachlorophenol
occurs in sunlight.   The effects of the various breakdown  prod-
ucts  which  may  remain  in  the  soil  was  not  found  in  the
literature.

Phenol  (65) .   Phenol,  also called hydroxybenzene and  carbolic
acid,  is a clear,  colorless, hygroscopic, deliquescent, crystal
line solid at room temperature.  Its melting point is 43C and its
vapor  pressure  at room temperature is 0.35 mm Hg.   It is  very
soluble  in water (67 gm/1 at. 16C) and can be dissolved  in  ben-
zene, oils, and petroleum solids.  Its formula is
Although  a  small percent of the annual production of phenol  is
derived  from coal tar as a naturally occur ing product,  most  of
the phenol is synthesized.  Two of the methods are fusion of ben-
zene  sulfonate with sodium hydroxide,  and oxidation  of  cumene
followed  by cleavage with a catalyst.   Annual production in the
U.S.  is in excess of one million tons.  Phenol is generated dur-
ing distillation of wood and the microbiological decomposition of
organic matter in the mammalian intestinal tract.             ;

Phenol is used as a disinfectant,  in the manufacture of  resins,
dyestuffs,  and  in Pharmaceuticals,,  and in the photo processing
industry.   In this discussion,  phenol is the specific  compound
which  is  separated  by  methylene  chloride  extraction  of  an
acidified sample and identified and quantified by GC/MS.   Phenol
also  contributes  to  the "Total Phenols,"  discussed  elsewhere
which are determined by the 4-AAP colorimetric method.

Phenol  exhibits  acute  and sub-acute  toxicity  in  humans  and
laboratory  animals.   Acute oral doses of phenol in humans cause
sudden collapse and unconsciousness by its action on the  central


                               1146

-------
nervous system.   Death occurs by respiratory arrest.   Sub-acute
oral |doses  in mammals are rapidly 'absorbed and quickly  distri-
buted;  to various organs/  then cleared from the body by  urinary
excretion and.metabolism.   Long term exposure by drinking phenol
contaminated  water  has resulted" in  statistically  significant
increase in. reported cases of diarrhea,  mouth sores, and burning
of the mouth.;   in laboratory'animals, long term oral administra-
tion ;at low levels produced slight |liver and kidney damage.   No
reports  wereifound regarding-carcihogenicity of phenol  adminis-
tered! orally --.all carciriogeriicity'studies were skin test.  •

For  the protection of human health from phenol ingested  through
water:  and through contaminated aquatic  organisms,  the  concen-
tration in:water .should not exceed 3.4 mg/1.
Fish:iand  other aquatic organisms demonstrated a wide  range  of
sensitivities'to phenol concentration.   However,  acute toxicity
values  were iat  moderate levels when compared  to  other  toxic
organic pollutants;  ;     ;     '     '
    ' ' '   ' "     '   - '..•    ' . ''  t '":".. ' "r        '         •'
Data ihave. .been:developed on the behavior of phenol in  a  POTW.
Phenol is biodegradable by biota present in a POTW.   The ability
of a POTW to treat phenol-bearing influents depends upon acclima-
tion  of the Ipiota and the constancy of the phenol concentration.
It  'appears ttiat,an induction period is required to build up   the
population  Of organisms'which can degrade phenol.   Too large a
concentration  will-result in>upset:or pass though in  the  POTW,
but" |^he  specific level causing upset depends on  the  immediate
past fhistory,-of phenol "concentrations in the  influent.   .Phenol
levels  ,as  high  as 200 "riig/1-have been treated with  95  percent
removal in a POTW,'but moire of'less continuous presence of phenol
is  , necessary>to maintain .the population of  microorganisms  that
degrade "phenol.    1--".V- '-'• '"'";" " '   !         :     '

Phenol which is not degraded is expected to pass through the POTW
because  of its vefy high 'water solubility.   However,  in a POTW
where   .chlorination  is practiced for disinfection  of  the  POTW
efflu>bnt, chlorination ,of phenol may occur.  The products of that
reaction may be : toxic, pollutants.   '    .     '•'

The .'EPA  hasl developed delta on influent and effluent  concentra-
tions! of total phenols -'in a study of 103 POTW  facilities.   How-
ever,!  the * analytical  procedure was the 4-AAP method  mentioned
earlier  and ,not  the'  GC/MS; method  specifically  for  phenol.
Discussion  of the study,  which oficourse. includes  phenol,  is
presented  under the pollutant heading "Total Phenols."  The most
recent  study by EPA,on the"behavior of toxic organics in a  POTW
indicates that phenol is 96 percent removed.
Phthalate  Esters  (66-71).
Phthalic  acid,   or   1,2-benzene
dicarboxylic racid,  is one of three isomeric benzenedicarboxylic
acids produce^ by the' chertiical industry.   The other two isomeric
forms1 are called isophthalic'and terephthalic acids.  The formula
for  i all  three  acids  is  C6H4(COOH)2.     Some   esters    of
phthalic  acid are designated as toxic pollutants.   They will be

-------
discussed as a group here,  and specific properties of individual
phthalate esters will be discussed afterwards.

Phthalic  acid esters are manufactured in the U.S.  at an  annual
rate in excess of one billion pounds.   They are used as  plasti-
cizers   — primarily  in  the production of  polyvinyl  chloride
(PVC)      resins.    The  most widely used phthalate plasticizer
is  bis  (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (66) which accounts for  nearly
one-third   of       the   phthalate  esters   produced.     This
particular ester  is  commonly  referred  to as dioctyl phthalate
(DOP) and should not  be      confused with one of the less  used
esters,   di-n-octyl  phthalate      (69),  which is also used as
a  plasticizer.   In addition to these      two  isomeric dioctyl
phthalates,   four other esters,   also  used      primarily   as
plasticizers,   are  designated as toxic   pollutants.       They
are:    butyl   benzyl  phthalate  (67),   di-n-butyl   phthalate
(68), diethyl phthalate (70), and dimethyl phthalate (71).

Industrially,  phthalate esters are prepared from phthalic  anhy-
dride and the specific alcohol to form the ester.   Some evidence
is  available  suggesting that phthalic acid esters also  may  be
synthesized  by certain plant and animal tissues.   The extent to
which this occurs in nature is not known.

Phthalate  esters used as plasticizers can be present in  concen-
trations up to 60 percent of the total weight of the PVC plastic.
The  plasticizer is not linked by primary chemical bonds  to  the
PVC resin.  Rather, it is locked into the structure of intermesh-
ing  polymer  molecules and held by van der  Waals  forces.   The
result is that the plasticizer is easily extracted.  Plasticizers
are  responsible for the odor associated with new plastic toys or
flexible sheet that has been contained in a sealed package.

Although  the phthalate esters are not soluble or are  only  very
slightly soluble in water, they do migrate into aqueous solutions
placed in contact with the plastic.    Thus, industrial facilities
with tank linings, .wire and cable coverings,  tubing,  and sheet
flooring  of PVC are expected to discharge some phthalate  esters
in  their raw waste.   In addition to their use as  plasticizers,
phthalate  esters are used in lubricating oils and pesticide car-
riers.   These  also  can contribute to industrial  discharge  of
phthalate esters.

From  the accumulated data on acute toxicity in  animals,  phtha-
late  esters  may be considered as having a rather low  order  of
toxicity.   Human toxicity data are limited.   It is thought that
the  toxic effect of the esters is most likely due to one of  the
metabolic products, in particular the monoester.  Oral acute tox-
icity in animals is greater for the lower molecular weight esters
than for the higher molecular weight esters.

Orally administered phthalate esters generally produced enlarging
of liver and kidney, and atrophy of testes in laboratory animals.
Specific esters produced enlargement of heart and brain,  spleen-
itis, and degeneration of central nervous system tissue.


                               1148                           ;

-------
Subacute doses administered orally to laboratory animals produced
some decrease in growth arid degeneration of the testes.   Chronic
studies in animals showed similar effects to those found in acute
and  subacute< studies,  but to a much lower  degree.   The  same
organs were enlarged,  -but pathological changes were not  usually
detected.     .                      '..'''

A recent study of several phthalic esters produced suggestive but
not conclusive evidence that dimethyl and diethyl phthalates have
a cancer liability.   Only four of the six toxic pollutant esters
were  included in the study.   Phthalate esters do bioconcentrate
in  fish.   The  factors,  weighted;for relative  consumption  of
various  aquatic and marine food groups, -are used  to  calculate
ambient  water quality criteria for four phthalate  esters.   The
values are included in the discussion of the specific esters.

Studies  of  toxicity of phthalate esters in freshwater and  salt
water'organisms are scarce;.   A chronic toxicity test with bis(2-
ethylhexyl)   phthalate  showed  that  significant   reproductive
impairment  occurred at 0,.003 mg/1 in the freshwater  crustacean,
Daphnia  magna.   In acute toxicityistudies,  saltwater fish  and
organisms  showed sensitivity differences of up to eight-fold  to
butyl;benzyl,  diethyl,  and dimethyl phthalates.   This suggests
that isach ester must be evaluated individually for toxic effects.

The biochemical oxidation of many of the toxic organic pollutants
has  been investigated in laboratory scale studies at  concentra-
tions  higher  than  would  normally  be  expected  in  municipal
wastewaters.   Three of the phthalate esters were studed.  Bis(2-
ethylhexyl) phthalate was found to be degraded slightly or not at
all and its removal by biological treatment in a POTW is expected
to be slight or zero.  Di-n-butyl phthalate and diethyl phthalate
were degraded1to a moderate degree and their removal by  biologi-
cal  treatment  in  a  POTW is expected to occur  to  a  moderate
degree.  Using these data and other observations relating molecu-
lar  structure to ease of biochemical degradation of other  toxic
organic pollutants,  the conclusion was reached that butyl benzyl
phthalate and dimethyl phthalate would be removed in a POTW to  a
moderate degree by biological treatment.   On the same basis,  it
was  concluded  that di-n-octyl phthalate would be removed  to  a
slight degree or not at all.   An EPA study of seven POTW facili-
ties ! revealed that for all but di-n-octyl phthalate,  which  was
not  Istudied,  removals ranged from; 62 to 87 percent.   The  most
recent  EPA  study  of  the behavior of toxic  organics  in  POTW
indicates removals ranging from 48 percent to 81 percent for  the
six phthalate; esters designated as toxic pollutants.

No information was found on possible interference with POTW oper-
ation  or the; possible effects on slludge by the phthalate esters.
The  water insoluble phthalate esters — butyl benzyl  and  di-\n-
octyl  phthalate — would tend to remain in sludge,  whereas  the
other  four toxic pollutant phthalate esters with water solubili-
ties ranging from 50 mg/1 to 4.5 mg/1 would probably pass through
into :the POTW effluent.
     i                              i          ...

     1                    :      1149!          ;

-------
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)  Phthdlate
	6) .   In addition to  the  general
remarks and discussion on phthalate esters,  specific information
on  bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate is provided.   Little information
is  available about the physical properties of  bis(2-ethylhexyl)
phthalate.   It  is  a liquid boiling at 387C at 5mm  Hg  and  is
insoluble       in       water.        Its       formula       is
CgH^COOCgHiy) .    This  toxic  pollutant  format
constitutes  about one-third of the phthalate ester production in
the U.S.   It is commonly referred to as   dioctyl phthalate,  or
DOP,  in  the plastics industry where it is the most  extensively
used compound for the plasticization of polyvinyl chloride (PVC).
Bis{2-ethylhexyl) phthalate has been approved by the FDA for  use
in plastics in contact with food.   Therefore, it may be found in
wastewaters   coming  in  contact  with  discarded  plastic  food
wrappers  as well as the PVC films and shapes normally  found  in
industrial plants.   This toxic pollutant is-also a commonly used
organic  diffusion pump oil,  where its low vapor pressure is  an
advantage.

For  the protection of human health from the toxic properties . of
bis(2-ethylhexyl)  phthalate  ingested through water and  through
contaminated aquatic organisms, the ambient water quality criter-
ion is determined to be 15 mg/1.   If contaminated aquatic organ-
isms alone are consumed,  excluding the consumption of water, the
ambient water criteria is determined to be 50 mg/1.

Biochemical oxidation of this toxic pollutant has'been studied^ on
a  laboratory scale at concentrations higher than would  normally
be expected in municipal wastewater.   In fresh water with a non-
acclimated  seed  culture no biochemical oxidation  was  observed
after 5,  10, and 2,0 days.  However, with an acclimated seed cul-
ture,  biological oxidation occured to the extents of 13,  0,  6,
and  23  percent of theoretical after 5,  10,   15 and  20  days,
respectively.   Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate concentrations were 3
to 10 mg/1.   Little or no removal of bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
by biological treatment in a POTW is expected.   The most  recent
EPA  study of the behavior of toxic organics in a POTW  indicates
that bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate is 62 percent removed.

Butyl Benzyl Phthalate (67) .   In addition to the general remarks
and discussion on phthalate esters, specific information on butyl
benzyl  phthalate is provided.   No information was found on  the
physical properties of this compound.

Butyl  benzyl  phthalate is used as a plasticizer for  PVC.   Two
special  applications  differentiate  it  from  other   phthalate
esters.   It  is  approved by the U.S.  FDA for food  contact .in
wrappers,  and  containers;  and it is the industry  standard  for
plasticization  of  vinyl  flooring  because  it  provides  stain
resistance.

No  ambient water quality criterion is proposed for butyl  benzyl
phthalate.
                               1150

-------
Butyl  benzyl: phthalate resmoval in a POTW by biological treatment
is expected to occur to a moderate degree.   The most recent  EPA
study  of the,behavior of toxic oroanics in POTWs indicates  that
butyl benzyl phthalate is 59 perce.it removed.

Di-n-butyl  Phthalate (68}..   In .addition to the general  remarks
and discussion on phthalat?e esters, 'specific information on di-n-
butyl'  phthalate  (DBP) isj provided.   DBF is  a  colorless,  oil
liquid,  boiling at 340C. t  Its water solubility, at room tempera-
ture is reported to be 0.4 g/1 and 4.5 g/1 in two different chem-
istry!    handbooks.   The/   formul4    for    DBP,  05114
(COOC,4H)2   is  the same sis for its \ isomer,  di-isobiityl
phthalate.   DBP  production /is  1,to 2 percent  of 'total  U.S.
phthalate ester production'.  /       i         :...'..'
                        /     '       i         .
                        i •    •       i        	i      •    -
Dibutyl  phthalate is usfed to a limited extent as  a  plasticizer
for  polyvinyl  chloride'  (PVC) .   It is not approved for  contact
with food.   It is used;in ,liquid lipsticks and as a diluent  for
polysulfide dental impression materials.   DBP is used as a plas-
ticizer for nitrocellulose in making gun powder, and as a fuel  in
solid;  propellants for rockets.   Further uses are  insecticides,
safety  glass manufacture,  textile .lubricating agents,  printing
inks, adhesives, paper cocitings, an4 resin solvents.

For  protection  of  human health from the  toxic  properties   of
dibutyl  phthalate  ingested through water and  through  contami-
nated: aquatic organisms,  the ambient water quality criterion   is
determined  to  be 34 mg/1.   If contaminated  aquatic  organisms
alone  are  consumed,  excluding the consumption  of  water,  the
ambient water:criterion is 154 mg/1.

Biochemical oxidation of this toxic pollutant has been studied  on
a  laboratory scale at concentrations higher than would  normally
be  expected in municipal wastewaters.   Biochemical oxidation  of
35,  43,  and  45 percent of theoretical oxidation"were  obtained
after  5,   10,   and  20  days,   respectively,   using   sewage
microorganisms as an unacclimated seed culture.      \

Biological  treatment in a POTW is expected to remove ^dijn
phthalate to a moderate degree.  The most recent EPA study' 6E the
behavior  of  toxic organics in a PQTW indicates that  di-n-butyl
phthalate is 48 percent removed.

Di-n-octyl  phthalate (69).   In addition to the general  remarks
and discussion on phthalate esters, specific information on di-n-
octyl\ phthalate is provided.   Di-n-octyl phthalate is not to   be
confused  with the isomeric bis (2-et;hylhexyl) phthalate which   is
commonly referred to in the plastics industry as OOP.  Di-n-octyl
phthalate  is  a liquid which boils at 220C at 5 mm  Hg.   It   is
insoluble    in   water.      .    It;s   molecular   formula     is
CsH4 ;     (COQCQRij)2'        Its  production
constitutes   about   1       percent  of  all  phthalate   ester
production in;the U.S.                                '    ,   ,
                               1151

-------
Industrially/  di-n-octyl  phthalate is used to plasticize  poly-
vinyl chloride (PVC) resins.                                  ;

No  ambient  water quality criterion is proposed  for  di-n-octyl
phthalate.

Biological  treatment in a POTW is expected to lead to little  or
no removal of di-n-octyl phthalate.  The most recent EPA study, of
the behavior of toxic organics in POTWs indicates that di-n-octyl
phthalate is 81 percent removed.

Diethyl  phthalate (70).   In addition to the general remarks and
discussion on phthalate esters,  specific information on  diethyl
phthalate is provided.  Diethyl phthalate, or DEP, is a colorless
liquid boiling at 296C, . and is insoluble in water.   Its molecu-
lar formula is C^S.^(COQC2^s)2'  Production of
diethyl  phthalate  constitutes  about 1.5 percent  of  phthalate
ester production in the U.S.

Diethyl phthalate is approved for use in plastic food  containers
by the U.S.  FDA.  In addition to its use as a polyyinyl chloride
(PVC)  plasticizer,  DEP is used to plasticize cellulose  nitrate
for  gun powder,  to dilute polysulfide dental impression materi-
als,  and  as an accelerator for dyeing  triacetate  fibers.   An
additional use which would contribute to its wide distribution in
the  environment  is as an approved special denaturant for  ethyl
alcohol.   The  alcohol-containing products for which DEP  is  an
approved  denaturant include a wide range of personal care , items
such as bath preparations,  bay rum, colognes, hair preparations,
face and hand creams,  perfumes and toilet soaps.   Additionally,
this  denaturant is approved for use in biocides,  cleaning solu-
tions,  disinfectants, insecticides, fungicides, and room deoder-
ants which have ethyl alcohol as part of the formulation.   it is
expected,  therefore,  that people and buildings would have  some
surface  loading of this toxic pollutant which would find its way
into raw wastewaters.

For  the protection of-human health .from the toxic properties  of
diethyl phthalate ingested through water and through contaminated
aquatic organisms,  the ambient water quality criterion is deter-
mined  to be 350 mg/1.   If contaminated aquatic organisms  alone
are  consumed,  excluding the consumption of water,  the  ambient
water criterion is 1,800 mg/1.

Biochemical oxidation of this toxic pollutant has been studied on
a  laboratory scale at concentrations higher than would  normally
be expected in municipal wastewaters.   Biochemical oxidation  of
79r  84,  and 89 percent of theoretical was observed after 5, 15,
and  20  days respectively.   Biological treatment in a  POTW  is
expected  to  lead  to a moderate degree of  removal  of  diethyl
phthalate.   The  most recent EPA study of the behavior of  toxic
organics  in POTWs indicates that diethyl phthalate is 74 percent
removed.
                               1152

-------
Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (72-84).    The polynuclear aro-
matic hydrocarbons (PAH) selected as toxic pollutants are a group
of 13;compounds consisting of substituted and unsubstituted poly-
cyclic: aromatic rings.  The general ;class of PAH includes hetero-
cyclies, but none of those were selected as toxic pollutants. PAH
are  formed as the result of incomplete combustion  when  organic
compounds are burned with insufficient oxygenJ   PAH are found in
coke oven emissions,  vehicular emissions,   and volatile products
of oil and gas burning.  The compounds chosen as toxic pollutants
are  listed  with  their  structural formula  and  melting  point
(m.p.).   All are insoluble in water.
      72   Benzo(a)anthracene (1,2-benzanthracene)
m.p. 162C
      73   Benzo(a)pyrene (3,4-benzopyrene)
m.p. 176C
      174   3,4-Benzofluoranthene
m.p. 168C
      75   Benzo(k)fluoranthene (11,,12-benzofluoranthene)
                                                         m.p. 217C
      ,16   Chrysene (1,2-benzphenanthrene)
 m.p. 255C
      77   Acenaphthylene
 m.p.  92C
                               1153

-------
      78   Anthracene
                                             m.p. 216C
      79   Benzo(ghi)perylene (1,12-benzoperylene)
                                                  m.p. not reported
       80   Fluorene (alpha-diphenylenemethane)
                                             m.p. 116C
       81
Phenanthrene
m.p. 101C
       82
       83
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene (1,2,5,6-
              dibenzoanthracene)
Indeno (1,2,3-cd)pyrene
   (2,3-o-phenylenepyrene)
       84   Pyrene
                                                          m.p. 269C
                                                   m.p. not available
                                              m.p. 156C
Some  of  these toxic pollutants have  commercial  or  industrial
uses.   Benzo(a)anthracene, benzo(a)pyrene, chrysene, anthracene,
dibenzo(arh)anthracene,  and pyrene are all used as antioxidants.
Chrysene, acenaphthylene, anthracene, fluorene, phenanthrene, and
py^ne  are all used for synthesis of dyestuffs or other  organic
charu^-cals.   3,4-Benzofluoranthrene,  benzo(k)fluoranthene, benzo
(ghi)perylene,  and  indeno (l,2,3-cd)pyrene have no known indus-
                               1154

-------
trial; uses,  according  to the results of  a  recent  literature
search.                        •     j •         : '              "
      !        !                ....  I         • '    . .  -

Several of the PAH toxic pollutants 'are found in smoked meats, in
smoke flavoring mixtures, :in vegetable oils, and in coffee.  Con-
sequently,  they  are also found in many drinking water supplies.
The  wide  distribution of these pollutants in  complex  mixtures
with the many other PAHs which have not been designated as  toxic
pollutants  results in exposures by |humans that cannot be associ-
ated with specific individual compounds.
The  screening and verification analysis procedures used for  the
toxic  organic pollutants are based on gas  chromatography  (GC).
Three ipairs of the PAH have identical elution times on the column
specified in the protocol, which means that -the parameters of the
pair  are not differentiated.   For [these three pairs [anthracene
(78)  - phenarithrene (81); 3,4-benzofluoranthene (74) - benzo(k)-
fluoranthene (.75);  and benzo(a)anthracene (72) - chrysene  (76)]
results  are  obtained and reported as "either-or."  Either  both
are  present in the combined concentration reported,  or  one  is
present in the concentration reported.

There  are no studies to document the possible carcinogenic risks
to humans by direct ingestion.  Air pollution studies indicate an
excess  of lung cancer mortality among workers exposed  to  large
amounts of PAH containing materials ;such as coal gas,  tars,  and
coke-oven emissions.   However, no definite proof exists that the
PAH  present  in these materials are responsible for the  cancers
observed.     ••       .               •.          :
      j   •     :         '   '          I   • '      :
Animal studies have demonstrated the toxicity of PAH by oral  and
dermal,  administration.   The  carcinogenicity  of PAH  has  been
traced to formation of PAH metabolites which,  in turn,  lead  to
tumor  formation.   Because the levels of PAH which induce cancer
are very low,  little work has been done on other health  hazards
resulting  from  exposure.   It  has been established  in  animal
studies that tissue damage and systemic toxicity can result  from
exposure to non-carcinogenic PAH compounds.

Because  there  were no studies available regarding chronic  oral
exposures to PAH mixtures,,  proposed^water quality criteria  were
derived using data on exposure to a single compound.  Two studies
were  selected.,  one  involving benzp(a)pyrene ingestion and  one
involving  dibenzo(a,h)anthracene  ingestion.    Both  are  known
animal carcinogens.                .;

For  the  maximum protection of human health from  the  potential
carcinogenic  effects of exposure to polynuclear aromatic  hydro-
carbons (PAH) through ingestion of water and contaminated aquatic
organisms,  the ambient water concentration is zero.   Concentra-
tions  of  PAH  estimated to result in additional risk  of  1  in
100,00;0  were  derived by the EPA and the Agency  is  considering
setting  criteria at an interim target risk level in the .range of
10~ ,  10~ ,  or 10~^ with corresponding criteria  of
0.000000097   nig/1 r   0.00000097   mfl/1,   and  0.0000097   mg/1,
respectively. , '                     \
      '•                              i

                               1155

-------
No  standard toxj.city tests have been reported for freshwater
saltwater organisms and any of the 13 PAH discussed here.
or
The  behavior of PAH in a POTW has received only a limited amount
of study.  It is reported that up to 90 percent of PAH entering a
POTW  will  be retained in the sludge generated  by  conventional
sewage  treatment processes.   Some of the PAH can  inhibit  bac-
terial  growth when they are present at concentrations as low  as
0,018  mg/1.   Biological treatment in activated sludge units has
been  shown  to  reduce the  concentration  of  phenanthrene  and
anthracene to some extent;  however,  a study of biochemical oxi-
dation  of  fluorene on a laboratory scale showed no  degradation
after 5, 10, and 20 days.  On the basis of that study and studies
of other toxic organic'pollutants, some general observations were
made relating molecular structure to ease of degradation.   Those
observations  lead to the conclusion that, the 13 PAH selected  to
represent  that  group as toxic pollutants will be  removed  only
slightly or not at all by biological treatment methods in a POTW.
Based on their water insolubility and tendency to attach to sedi-
ment  particles very little pass through of PAH to POTW  effluent
is expected    The most recent EPA study of the behavior of toxic
organics  in POTW indicates that removals for five of the 13  -PAH
range from 40 percent to 83 percent.                          :

No  data  are available at this time to support  any  conclusions
about   contamination  of  land by PAH on  which  sewage   sludge
containing PAH is spread.

Tetrachloroethylene          (85).            Tetrachloroethylene
(CCl2CCl2)r  also called perchloroethylene and PCE,  is a
colorless,  nonflammable liquid produced mainly by two methods —
chlorination   and   pyrolysis  of  ethane   and   propane,   and
oxychlorination  of  dichloro  ethane.   U.S.  annual  production
exceeds 300,000 tons.  PCE boils at 121C and has a vapor pressure
of  19  mm Hg at 20C.   It is insoluble in water but  soluble  in
organic solvents.

Approximately  two-thirds of the U.S.  production of PCE is  used
for  dry cleaning.   Textile processing and metal degreasing,  in
equal amounts consume about one-quarter of the U.S. production.

The  principal toxic effect of PCE on humans is  central  nervous
system  depression  when  the  compound  is  inhaled.   Headache,
fatigue,  sleepiness,  dizziness,  and sensations of intoxication
are  reported.   Severity of effects increases with vapor concen-
tration.  High integrated exposure (concentration times duration)
produces  kidney  and liver damage.   Very limited  data  on  ,PCE
ingested  by laboratory animals indicate liver damage occurs when
PCE  is administered by that route.   PCE tends to distribute: to
fat in mammalian bodies.

One  report found in the literature suggests,  but does not  con-
clude,  that PCE is teratogenic.  PCE has been demonstrated to be
a liver carcinogen in B6C3-P1 mice.                           :
                               1156

-------
For  the  maximum protection of human health from  the  potential
carcinogenic  effects of exposure to', tetrachlorethylene  through
ingestion of water and contaminated aquatic organisms,  the ambi-
ent  water  concentration  should  b0  zero.   Concentrations  of
tetrachloroethylene  estimsitgd to result in  additional  lifetime
cancer  risk  levels  of 10" ,
                                10'
and  10
                                               •o
                                                  are
0.000020 mg/1, 0.00020 mg/1, and 0.0020 mg/1, respectively.

Many  of the toxic organic pollutants have been investigated,  at
least in laboratory scale studies,  at concentrations higher than
those 'expected  to be contained by most  municipal  wastewaters.
General  observations  have  been  developed  relating  molecular
structure  to  ease of degradation for all of the  toxic  organic
pollutants.   The conclusions reached by the study of the limited
data is that biological treatment produces a moderate removal  of
PCE  in a POTW ,by degradation.   No information was found to indi
cate that PCE accumulates in the sludge, but some PCE is expected
to be adsorbed onto settling particles.   Some PCE is expected to
be volatilized in aerobic treatment processes and little, if any,
is expected to pass through into the effluent from the POTW.  The
most re?cent EPA study of the behavior of toxic organics in  POTWs
indicates that 'PCE is 81 percent removed.

Toluene  (86).
	   86).    Toluene  is  a clear,  colorless liquid  with  a
benzenes-like odor.   It is a naturally occuring compound  derived
primarily  from  petroleum  or  petrochemical  processes.    Some
toluene  is obtained from the manufacture of metallurgical  coke.
Toluene is also 'referred to; as totuoL,  methylbenzene, methacide,
and  phenylmethane.   It  is  an aromatic  hydrocarbon  with  the
formula    C6H5CH3.     It  boils  at  111C  and  has  a    vapor
pressure  of 30 mm Hg at room temperature.   The water solubility
of  toluene  is 535 mg/1,  and it is miscible with a  variety  of
organic; solvents.   Annual production; of toluene in the  U.S.  is
greater  than two million metric tons'.   Approximately two-thirds
of  the  toluene  is converted to benzene and  the  remaining  30
percent   is   divided  approximately;   equally   into   chemical
manufacture,  and  use  as a paint solvent and aviation  gasoline
additive.   An  estimated 5,000 metric tons is discharged to  the
environment anually as a constituent in wastewater.

Most  data on the effects of toluene in human and  other  mammals
have been based; on inhalation exposurfe or dermal contact studies.
There  appear to be no reports of oral administration of  toluene
to  human  subjects.   A long term toxicity study on female  rats
revealed no adverse effects on growth,  mortality, appearance and
behavior,  organ  to  body  weight  ratios,  blood-urea  nitrogen
levels,  bone marrow counts,, peripheral blood counts, or morphol-
ogy of major organs.   The effects of;inhaled toluene on the cen-
tral nervous system,  both at high and low  concentrations,  have
been studied in humans and animals.  However, ingested toluene is
expected  to  be  handled differently'. by the body because  it  is
absorbed more slowly and must first pass through the liver before
reaching the nervous system,;   Toluen^ is extensively and rapidly
metabolized in the liver.   One of th^ principal metabolic- prod-
                               1157

-------
ucts  of  toluene  is benzole acid,  which itself seems  to  have
little potential to produce tissue injury.

Toluene  does not appear to be teratogenic in laboratory  animals
or  man.   Nor is there any conclusive evidence that  toluene  is
mutagenic.   Toluene  has not been demonstrated to be positive in
any in vitro mutagenicity or carcinogenicity bioassay system, nor
to be carcinogenic in animals or man.

Toluene  has  been found in fish caught in harbor waters  in  the
vicinity of petroleum and petrochemical plants.  Bioconcentration
studies  have not been conducted,  but  bioconcentration  factors
have  been calculated on the basis of the octanol-water partition
coefficient.

For  the protection of human health from the toxic properties ; of
toluene  ingested through water and through contaminated  aquatic
organisms,  the ambient water criterion is determined to be  14.3
mg/1.   If  contaminated  aquatic  organisms alone  are  consumed
excluding the consumption of water,  the ambient water  criterion
is  424  mg/1.   Available.data show that the adverse effects ' on
aquatic life occur at concentrations as low as 5 mg/1.

Acute  toxicity  tests  have been conducted with  toluene  and  a
variety of freshwater fish and Daphnia magna.  The latter appears
to  be significantly more resistant than fish.   No test  results
have  been  reported  for  the  chronic  effects  of  toluene  on
freshwater fish or invertebrate species.

The  biochemical  oxidation of many of the toxic  pollutants  has
been  investigated in laboratory scale studies at  concentrations
greater  than  those.expected to be contained by  most  municipal
wastewaters.   At  toluene concentrations ranging from 3  to  250
mg/1 biochemical oxidation proceeded to 50 percent of theoretical
or  greater.   The time period varied from a few hours to 20 days
depending  on  whether or not the seed  culture  was  acclimated.
Phenol  adapted acclimated seed cultures gave the most rapid  and
extensive biochemical oxidation.

Based  on study of the limited data,  it is expected that toluene
will  be biochemically oxidized to a lesser extent than  domestic
sewage  by biological treatment in a POTW.   The  volatility  and
relatively  low water solubility of toluene lead to the  expecta-
tion  that aeration processes will remove significant  quantities
of  toluene  from the POTW.    The EPA studied toluene removal1  in
seven  POTW  facilities.   The  removals ranged from  40  to  100
percent    Sludge  concentrations  of toluene ranged  from  54  x
10"^   to  1.85  mg/1.    The most recent EPA  study  of  the;
behavior  ^of toxic  organics  in a POTW indicates that toluene is
90  percent   removed.                                       !

Trichloroethylene (87).  Trichloroethylene (1,1,2-trichloroethyl-
ene or TCE) is a clear,  colorless liquid boiling at 87C.  It; has
a vapor pressure of 77 mm Hg at room temperature and is  slightly
soluble in water (1 g/1).   U.S.  production is greater than 0.25


                               1158

-------
million  metric tons annually.   It is produced from tetrachloro-
ethanejby treatment with lime in the presence of water.

TCE isiused for vapor phase degreasing of metal  parts,  cleaning
and drying electronic components,  as a solvent for paints,  as a
refrigerant, for extraction of oils, fats, and waxes, and for dry
cleaning.   Its  widespread  use and relatively  high  volatility
result I in detectable levels in many parts of the environment.

Data  on the effects produced by ingested TCE are limited*   Most
studies have been directed at inhalation exposure.   Nervous sys-
tem disorders and liver damage are frequent results of inhalation
exposure.   In  the short term exposures,  TCE acts as a  central
nervous  system depressant — it was used as an anesthetic before
its other long term effects were defined.

TCE has been shown to induce transformation in a highly sensitive
in vitro Fischer rat embryo cell system (F1706) that is used  for
identifying  carcinogens.   Severe and persistent toxicity to the
liver  ;was  recently demonstrated when TCE was shown  to  produce
carcinoma  of the liver in mouse strain B6C3F1    One  systematic
study of TCE exposure and the incidence of human cancer was based
on 518 men exposed to TCE.   The authors of that study  concluded
that  although . the  cancer  risk to man  cannot  be  ruled  out,
exposure   to   low  levels of TCE probably does  not  present  a
very serious and general cancer hazard.

TCE is ;bioconcentrated in aquatic species, making the consumption
of such species by humans a significant source of TCE.   For  the
protection  of 1 human  health  from  £he  potential  carcinogenic
effects  of  exposure to trichloroethylene through  ingestion  of
water and contaminated aquatic organisms,  the ambient water con-
centration .   is  zero.     Concentrations  of : trichloroethylene
estimated  to  result  in  additional lifetime  cancer  risks  of
10~7,  10~6,  and 10~5 are 0.00027 mg/1, 0.0027 mg/1,
and 0.027 mg/1,  respectively.  If contaminated aquatic organisms
alone  'are  consumed excluding the consumption :  of  water,   the
water  concentration should be less than 0.807 mg/1      to  keep
the additional lifetime cancer risk below 10" .
       !                              '
Only  a  very  limited amount of data, on the effects  of  TCE  on
freshwater aquatic life are available.    One species of fish (fat
head  minnows)  showed  a loss of equilibrium  at  concentrations
below those resulting in lethal effects.
       [        ;            '          i     ,        "          " '
In laboratory scale studies of toxic organic pollutants,  TCE was
subjected to biochemical oxidation conditions.   After 5, 10, and
20 days| no biochemical oxidation occurred.   On the.basis of this
study  bnd general observations relating molecular  structure  to
ease  of  degradation,  the conclusion is reached that TCE  would
undergo;  no  removal  by biological treatment  in  a  POTW.   The
volatility and relatively low water solubility of TCE is expected
to result in volatilization of some of the TCE in aeration  steps
in  a POTW.   The most recent EPA study of the behavior of  toxic
organics in a POTW indicates that TCE'is 85 percent removed.
                               1159

-------
Antimony (114).   Antimony (chemical name - stibium,  symbol Sb),
classified as a non-metal or metalloid, is a silvery white, brit-
tle  crystalline  solid.   Antimony is found in small ore  bodies
throughout the world.   Principal ores are oxides of mixed  anti-
mony valences,  and an oxysulfide ore.   Complex ores with metals
are  important because the antimony is recovered as a by-product.
Antimony  melts at 631C,  and is a poor conductor of  electricity
and heat.

Annual U.S. consumption of primary antimony ranges from 10,000 to
20,000 tons.   About half is consumed in metal products — mostly
antimonial lead for lead acid storage batteries,  and about  half
in non-metal products.  A principal compound is antimony trioxide
which  is used as a flame retardant in fabrics,  and as an opaci-
fier in glass, ceramics, and enamels.  Several antimony compounds
are used as catalysts in organic chemicals synthesis,  as fluori-
nating agents (the antimony fluorides),  as pigments, and in fire
works.  Semiconductor applications are economically significant.

Essentially  no  information  on  antimony-induced  human  health
effects has been derived from community epidemiology studies. The
available  data are in literature relating effects observed  with
therapeutic   or   medicinal  uses  of  antimony  compounds   and
industrial  exposure studies.   Large therapeutic doses of  anti-
monial  compounds,  usually used to treat  schistisomiasis,  have
caused  severe nausea,  vomiting,  convulsions,  irregular  heart
action,   liver  damage,  and  skin  rashes.   Studies  of  acute
industrial  antimony  poisoning have revealed loss  of  appetite,
diarrhea,  headache,  and  dizziness in addition to the  symptoms
found in studies of therapeutic doses of antimony.            ;

For  the protection of human health from the toxic properties  of
antimony ingested through water and through contaminated  aquatic
organisms  the ambient water criterion is determined to be  0.146
mg/1.   If contaminated aquatic organisms are consumed, excluding
the  consumption of water,  the ambient water criterion is deter-
mined to be 45 mg/1.- Available data show that adverse effects on
aquatic life occur at concentrations higher than those cited  ,for
human health risks.

The  limited solubility of most antimony compounds expected in  a
POTW,  i.e., the oxides and sulfides, suggests that at least part
of the antimony entering a POTW will be precipitated and incorpo-
rated  into the sludge.   However,  some antimony is expected  to
remain  dissolved  and pass through the POTW into  the  effluent.
Antimony  compounds  remaining  in  the  sludge  under  anaerobic
conditions  may  be connected to stibine (SbH3),  a very  soluble
and  very  toxic compound.   There are no data to  show  antimony
inhibits  any POTW processes.   The most recent EPA study of  the
behavior  of toxic pollutants in POTW indicates that antimony  is
60 percent removed.  Antimony is not known to be essential to the
growth  of plants,  and has been reported to be moderately toxic.
Therefore,  sludge containing large amounts of antimony could  be
detrimental  to  plants  if  it is applied in  large  amounts ; to
                               1160

-------
cropland.
      ;        j                      I

Arsenib (115).    Arsenic (chemical symbol As), is classified as a
non-metal or metalloid.  Elemental arsenic normally exists in the
alpha-crystalline metallic,form which is steel gray and  brittle,
and  in the beta form which is dark gray and amorphous.   Arsenic
sublimes at 615C.   Arsenic is widely distributed throughout  the
world in a large number of minerals.   The most important commer-
cial  source  of  arsenic is as a by-product  from  treatment  of
copper', lead, cobalt, and gold ores.  Arsenic is usually marketed
as  the  trioxide  (AS2O3),.     Annual  U.S.   production  of  the
trioxide approaches 40,000 tons.    '.

The principal use of arsenic is in agricultural chemicals (herbi-
cides)  for controlling weeds in cotton fields.   Arsenicals have
various  applications  in medicinal and vetrinary  use,  as  wood
preservatives,  and in semiconductors,
           •                         i                   :
The effects of arsenic in humans were known by the ancient Greeks
and  Romans.   The principal toxic effects  are  gastrointestinal
disturbances.   Breakdown of red blood'cells occurs.  Symptoms of
acute ;poisoning  include  vomiting,  diarrhea,  abdominal  pain,
lassitude,  dizziness,  and  headache.   Longer exposure produced
dry, falling hair, brittle,-  loose nails, eczema, and exfoliation.
Arsenicals  also  exhibit teratogenic and  mutagenic  effects  in
humans;.   Oral  administration  of  arsenic  compounds  has  been
associated  clinically  with skin cancer for nearly  one  hundred
years..   Since  1888  numerous studies have  linked  occupational
exposure  and therapeutic administration of arsenic compounds  to
increased incidence of respiratory and skin cancer.

For  the  maximum protection of human health from  the  potential
carcinogenic  effects of exposure to arsenic through ingestion of
water and contaminated aquatic organisms,  the ambient water con-
centration should be zero.    Concentrations of arsenic estimated
to result in additional lifetime cancer risk levels of  10~',
10~6, [and  10 5 are_2.2 x 10 7  mg/1,  2.2  10 5
mg/1, : and  2.2 x 10 5 mg/1,  respectively.   If contaminated
aquatic organisms alone are; consumed,   excluding the  consumption
of_ water,  the  water concentration, should be less than  1.75  x
10_   :to  keep  the  increased lifetime  cancer  risk  below
10~.         :   Available  data show that adverse effects on
aquatic   life       occur  at concentrations higher  than  those
cited for human health      risks.
      i        ;                      !           "        -   -   ''

A few studies have been made regarding the behavior of arsenic in
a POTWi,  One EPA survey of nine POTW^facilities reported influent
concentrations ranging from 0.0005 to 0.693 mg/1;  effluents from
three ,| POTW having biological treatment contained 0.0004 to  0.01
mg/1; itwo POTW facilities showed arsenic removal efficiencies of
50 and 71 percent in biological treatment.   Inhibition of treat-
ment  processes  by sodium arsenate is reported to occur,  at  0.1
mg/1  in activated sludge, '  and 1.6 mg/1 in  anaerobic  digestion
processes.   In  another study based on data from 60 POTW facili-

-------
ties,  arsenic , in sludge ranged from 1.6 to 65.6 mg/kg  and  the
median  value  was 7.8 mg/kg.   The most recent EPA study of  the
behavior  of  toxic  pollutants  in  POTW  indicates  that  total
trivalent  arsenic  is 65 percent  removed.   Arsenic  in  sludge
spread  on cropland may be taken up by plants grown on that land.
Edible plants can take up arsenic,  but normally their growth  is
inhibited before the plants are ready for harvest.

Beryllium (117).   Beryllium is a dark gray metal of the alkaline
earth family.   It is relatively rare,  but because of its unique
properties  finds  widespread use as an alloying  element,  espe-
cially for hardening copper which is used in springs,  electrical
contacts,  and non-sparking tools.   World production is reported
to  be in the range of 250 tons  annually.   However,  much  more
reaches  the  environment as emissions from coal  burning  opera-
tions.   Analysis  of coal indicates an average beryllium content
of 3 ppm and 0.1 to 1.0 percent in coal ash or fly ash.

The  principal ores are beryl        (3BeO'Al2O3*
6Si02) and bertrandite [Be4Si20y(OH)2]•  Only
two  industrial      facilities  produce  beryllium in the   U.S.
because  of  limited      demand  and the highly toxic character.
About two-thirds of the      annual production goes into  alloys,
20  percent into heat  sinks,       and 10 percent into beryllium
oxide (BeO) ceramic products.

Beryllium has a specific gravity of 1.846, making it the lightest
metal  with a high melting point (1,350C).   Beryllium alloys are
corrosion  resistant,  but the metal corrodes in aqueous  environ
ments.   Most common beryllium compounds are soluble in water, at
least to the extent necessary to produce a toxic concentration of
beryllium ions.

Most data on toxicity of beryllium is for inhalation of beryllium
oxide  dust.   Some studies on orally administered  beryllium  in
laboratory animals have been reported.   Despite the large number
of  studies  implicating beryllium as a carcinogen,  there is  -no
recorded  instance of cancer being produced  by  ingestion.   How
ever,  a  recently convened panel of uninvolved experts concluded
that  epidemiologic  evidence is suggestive that beryllium  is • a
carcinogen in man.

In  the  aquatic environment beryllium is  chronically  toxic  .to
aquatic  organisms  at 0.0053 mg/1.   Water softness has a  large
effect on beryllium toxicity to fish.   In soft water,  beryllium
is reportedly 100 times as toxic as in hard water.             l

For  the  maximum protection of human health from  the  potential
carcinogenic  effects of exposure to beryllium through  ingestion
of  water  and contaminated aquatic organisms the  ambient  water
concentration  should  be  zero.    Concentrations  of  beryllium
estimated to result in additional lifetime cancer risk levels  >of
10~7,  10~6,  and 10~5 are 0.00000068 mg/1, 0.0000068
mg/1,  and 0.000068 mg/1, respectively.    If contaminated aquatic
organisms  alone are consumed excluding the consumption of water,
                               1162

-------
the  concentration should be less than 0.00117 mg/1 to  keep  the
increased lifetime cancer risk below ,.10".  .

Information  on  the behavior of beryllium in a POTW  is  scarce.
Because beryllium hydroxide is insoluble in water, most beryllium
entering a POTW will probably be in the form of suspended solids.
As a result most of tiie beryllium will settle and be removed with
sludge,,   However,'• beryllium  has been shown to inhibit  several
enzyme  systems,  to. interfere with PNA metabolism in the  liver,
and to induce chromosomal and mitotic? abnormalities.  This inter-
ference  in  cellular  processes  may extend  to  interfere  with
biological treatment processes.  The ^concentration and effects of
beryllium  in sludge which could be applied to cropland  has  not
been studied.

Cadmium  (118).   Cadmium  is a relatively rare metallic  element
that is seldom 'found in sufficient quantities in a pure state  to
warrant  mining  or extraction from the earth's surface.   It  is
found,  in  trace amounts of about 1 ppm  throughout  the  earth's
crust.   Cadmium is,  however, a valuable by-product of zinc pro-
duction,                             i

Cadmium is used primarily as an electroplated metal, and is found
as  an : impurity in the secondary refining  of  zinc,  lead,  and
copper.        i

Cadmium  is an extremely dangerous cumulative  toxicant,  causing
progressive  chronic  poisoning in mammals,  fish,  and  probably
other organisms.  The metal, is not excreted.

Toxic effects of cadmium on man have been reported from  through-
out  the  world.   Cadmium may be a factor in the development  of
such human pathological conditions as: kidney disease,  testicular
tumors,   hypertension,   arteriosclerosis,   growth  inhibition,
chronic  disease of old age,  and cancer.   Cadmium  is  normally
ingested by humans through food and water as well as by breathing
air  contaminated by cadmium dust.   Cadmium is cumulative in the
liver, kidney, pancreas, and thyroid of humans and other animals.
A severe bone and kidney syndrome known as itai-itai disease  has
been  documented  in ,Japan as caused!by  cadmium  ingestion  via
drinking  water and contaminated irrigation water.   Ingestion of
as little as 0.6 mg/day has produced the disease.   Cadmium  acts
synerglstically with other metals.  Copper and zinc substantially
increase its toxicity.          -      •

Cadmium   is  concentrated  by  marine  organisms,   particularly
molluscs,  which accumulate cadmium in calcareous tissues and  in
the viscera.  A concentration factor pf 1,000 for cadmium in fish
muscle has been reported,  as have concentration factors of 3,000
in marine plants and up to 29,600 in Certain marine animals.  The
eggs  and larvae of fish are apparently more sensitive than adult
fish to poisoning by cadmium,  and crustaceans appear to be  more
sensitive than fish eggs and larvae. |

For  the protection of human health from the toxic properties  of
                               1163

-------
cadmium  ingested through water and through contaminated  aquatic
organisms,  the ambient water criterion is determined to be 0.010
mg/1.   Available  data show that adverse effects on aquatic life
occur  at  concentrations in the same range as  those  cited  for
human health, and they are highly dependent on water hardness.

Cadmium  is not destroyed when it is introduced into a POTW,  and
will either pass through to the POTW effluent or be  incorporated
into  the POTW sludge.   In addition,  it can interfere with  the
POTW treatment process.                                       :

In  a  study of 189 POTW facilities,  75 percent of  the  primary
plants,  57 percent of the trickling filter plants, 66 percent of
the  activated  sludge plants,  and 62 percent of the  biological
plants  allowed over 90 percent of the influent cadmium  to  pass
through  to the POTW effluent.   Only two of the 189 POTW facili-
ties  allowed less than 20 percent pass-through,  and  none  less
than  10  percent  pass-through.   POTW  effluent  concentrations
ranged from 0.001 to 1.97 mg/1 (mean 0.028 mg/1,  standard devia-
tion  0.167 mg/1).   The most recent EPA study of the behavior of
toxic  pollutants  in POTW indicates that cadmium is  38  percent
removed.                                                      :

Cadmium  not  passed  through the POTW will be  retained  in  the
sludge where it is likely to build up in concentration.   Cadmium
contamination  of sewage sludge limits its use on land  since  it
increases  the  level  of cadmium in the soil.   Data  show  that
cadmium can be incorporated into crops,  including vegetables and
grains, from contaminated soils.  Since the crops themselves show
no  adverse effects from soils with levels up to 100  mg/kg  cad-
mium, these contaminated crops could have a significant impact on
human  health.   Two Federal agencies have already recognized the
potential adverse human health effects posed by the use of sludge
on cropland.   The FDA recommends that sludge containing over  30
mg/kg of cadmium should not be used on agricultural land.  Sewage
sludge  contains 3 to 300 mg/kg (dry basis) of cadmium mean =  10
mg/kg;  median     16 mg/kg.   The USDA also  recommends  placing
limits  on  the total cadmium from sludge that may be applied  to
land.

Chromium (119).   Chromium is an elemental metal usually found as
a chromite (FeO'C^Os).   The metal is normally  produced      by
reducing  the oxide with aluminum.   A significant proportion  of
the  chromium  used  is in the form of compounds such  as  sodium
dichromate  (Na2CrO4),  and chromic acid (CzOj) — both       are
hexavalent chromium compounds.                                !

Chromium  is  found  as  an alloying  component  of  many  steels
(especially  high nickel stainless steels) and its compounds  are
used  in electroplating baths,  and as corrosion  inhibitors  for
closed water circulation systems.

The  two  chromium forms most frequently found in industry  waste
waters  are  hexavalent  and  trivalent   chromium.    Hexavalent
chromium  is the form used for metal treatments.   Some of it  is
                               1164

-------
reduced  to  trivalent chromium as part of the process  reaction.
The  raw  wastewater containing both valence  states  is  usually
treated  first to reduce remaining hexavalent to trivalent  chro-
mium, and second to precipitate the trivalent form as the hydrox-
ide.  The hexavalent form is not removed by lime treatment.

Chromium, in its various valence states, is hazardous to man.  It
can produce lung tumors when inhaled, and induces skin sensitiza-
tions.   Large  doses of chromates have corrosive effects on  the
intestinal  tract  and  can cause inflammation  of  the  kidneys.
Hexavalent chromium is a known human carcinogen.  Levels of chro-
mate  ions  that show no effect in man appear to be so low as  to
prohibit determination, to' date.

The  toxicity ' of chromium salts to fish and other  aquatic  life
varies widely with the species,  temperature,  pH, valence of the
chromium, and synergistic or antagonistic effects, especially the
effect  of  water hardness.   Studies have shown  that  trivalent
chromium  is more toxic to fish of some types than is  hexavalent
chromium.  Hexavalent chromium retards growth of one, fish species
at  0.0002 mg/1.   Fish food organisms and other lower  forms  of
aquatic  life  are extremely sensitive to  chromium.   Therefore,
both hexavalent and trivalent chromium must be considered harmful
to particular fish or organisms.

For  the protection of human health from the toxic properties  of
chromium (except hexavalent chromium) ingested through water  and
contaminated aquatic organisms,  the ambient water quality crite-
rion  \is 170 mg/1.   If contaminated, aquatic organisms alone  are
consumed,  excluding the consumption of water,  the ambient water
criterion  for  trivalent chromium is 3,443  mg/1.   The  ambient
water quality criterion for hexavalent chromium is recommended to
be  identical  to the existing drinking water standard for  total
chromium which is 0.050 mg/1.

Chromium  is not destroyed when treated by a POTW  (although  the
oxidation state may change),  and will either pass through to the
POTW effluent or be incorporated into the POTW sludge.  Both oxi-
dation  states  can cause POTW treatment inhibition and can  also
limit the usefulness of municipal sludge.

Influent concentrations of chromium to POTW facilities have  been
observed  by EPA to range from 0.005 to 14.0 mg/1,  with a median
concentration of 0.1.mg/1.  The efficiencies for removal of chro-
mium by the activated sludge process can vary greatly,  depending
on  chromium concentration in the influent,  and other  operating
conditions at.the POTW.   Chelation of chromium by organic matter
and  dissolution  due  to the presence of  carbonates  can  cause
deviations from the predicted behavior in treatment systems.

The systematic presence of chromium compounds will halt  nitrifi-
cation in a POTW for short periods, .and most of the chromium will
be. retained in the sludge solids.   Hexavalent chromium has been
reported to severely affect the nitrification process,  but  tri-
valent  chromium  has little or no toxicity to activated'  sludge,
                               1165

-------
except at high concentrations.  The presence of iron, copper, and
low  pH  will  increase the toxicity of chromium  in  a  POTW  by
releasing  the  chromium into solution to be ingested
organisms in the POTW.
by  micro-
The  amount of chromium which .passes through to the POTW effluent
depends on the type of treatment processes used by the POTW.  . I.n
a study of 240 POTW facilities,  56 percent of the primary plants
allowed more than 80 percent pass-through to POTW effluent.  More
advanced treatment results in less pass through.   POTW  effluent
concentrations ranged from 0.003 to 3.2 mg/1 total chromium (mean
= 0.197,  standard deviation = 0.48),  and from 0.002 to 0.1 mg/1
hexavalent  chromium (mean = 0.017,  standard deviation'= 0.020).
The most recent EPA study of the behavior of toxic pollutants  in
POTWs indicates that hexavalent chromium is 18 percent removed.

Chromium  not  passed  through the POTW will be retained  in  the
sludge,  where it is likely to build up in concentration.  Sludge
concentrations of total chromium of over 20,000 mg/kg (dry basis)
have  been observed.   Disposal of sludges containing  very  high
concentrations  of trivalent chromium can potentially cause prob-
lems  in  uncontrolled  landfills.    Incineration,   or  similar
destructive oxidation processes,  can produce hexavalent chromium
from  lower valence states.   Hexavalent chromium is  potentially
more toxic than trivalent chromium.  In cases where high rates of
chrome  sludge  application on land  are  used,  distinct  growth
inhibition and plant tissue uptake have been noted.

Pretreatment  of discharges substantially reduces the  concentra-
tion of chromium in sludge.   In Buffalo,  New Yo