Si%iJ|ซj";0TO
gifiฅa'}iiliSiiai


-------

-------
     Life-Cycle Assessment  of
     Desktop Computer Displays:
     Summary of Results
This summary document is based on information presented in the project report, Desktop
Computer Displays: A Life-Cycle Assessment, written by University of Tennessee under a grant from
EPA. Some information in the Life Cycle Assessment was provided by individual technology
vendors and has not been independently corroborated by EPA. The identification of specific
products or processes in.this document is not intended to represent an endorsement by EPA or
the U.S. Government. This summary document has not been through a formal exteneral peer
review process.
      Electronic Industries Alliance


-------
 Acknowledgments

 This document was prepared for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Design for the
 Environment (DfE) Computer Display Project by Abt Associates under contract #68-W-01-039.
 This document is based primarily on the full project report, Desktop Computer Displays: A Life-.
 Cycle Assessment, prepared by Maria Leet Socolof, Jonathan G. Overly, Lori E. Kincaid, and Jack
 R. Geibig of the University of Tennessee Center for Clean Products and Clean Technologies,
 under a grant from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Design for the Environment \
 Program, in the Economics, Exposure, and Technology Division of the Office of Pollution   ;
 Prevention and Toxics.                                 •                           ;

 The Life-Cycle Assessment would not have been possible without the assistance  of the technol-
 ogy suppliers and their customers who voluntarily participated in the project. The project Core
 Group provided valuable guidance and feedback throughout the preparation of the report. Core
 Group members include: Kathy Hart and Dipti Singh, U.S. EPA; Holly Evans and Heather
 Bowman, Electronic Industries Alliance; Frank Marella, Sharp Electronics Corp.; Maria Socolof
 and Lori Kincaid, University of Tennessee Center for Clean Products and Clean  Technologies;;
John Lott, Dupont Electronic Materials; Bob Pinnel, U.S. Display Consortium;  Greg Pitts,   •"
 Ecolibrium; Doug Smith, Sony Electronics Inc.; Ted Smith, Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition;
 David Thompson, Matsushita Electronic Corporation of America; and Dani Tsuda, Apple
 Computer, Inc.

-------


Contents
Introduction
Question 1:
   What is a life-cycle assessment?
                                                         .....3
Question 2:
'.   Which computer displays were investigated
   during the project?	•	•••••5

Question 3:                                        .
   How were environmental and health impacts evaluated?	11

                                                                       ^•'j.j.j.yxt


                                                                 =,-_^SS5.-s JM? -^'KigrSgSi^sis^sPfe;-j-'
 Question 4:
   What are the environmental and health impacts of CRTs?	15

 Questions.:                              .             -          mw**^^-	n*^^ป
   What are the environmental and health impacts of LCDs?	20

 Question 6:
   Overall, where were the greatest environmental
   and health impacts?	•	25

 Question 7:
   What are the performance and cost differences
   between the two technologies?	.27

• Question 8:                                                     •^moa^r*****
   Can the lead, mercury, and liquid crystals in
   computer displays pose health risks?	30

 Question 9:
   What can computer display manufacturers do to
   reduce environmental impacts?	••—	34

 Question 10:
   Where can I find more information about the
   computer display industry?	36
                                                                  ^^^^i^i^ii^K~ '"'"

-------

-------
Introduction
This report summarizes the results of an analysis conducted by U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency's Design for the Environment (DfE) Computer Display Project (CDP). The DfE
Computer Display Project is a voluntary, cooperative partnership among the DfE Program, the
University of Tennessee Center for Clean Products and Clean Technologies, the electronics
industry, and other interested parties. The partnership assessed the life-cycle environmental
impacts of two technologies that can be used for desktop computer displays.  Specifically, it
evaluated the traditional cathode ray tube (CRT) technology and the newer liquid crystal display
(LCD) technology.

PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF THE PROJECT
The purpose of the Computer Display Project was twofold:
   1) to assess the life-cycle environmental impacts of CRT and LCD technologies used in
      desktop computer displays; and
   2) to develop a model that will expedite future environmental life-cycle analyses for computer
      display analyses.

To conduct this analysis, a life-cycle assessment (LCA) was used as the environmental evaluation
tool. LCA looks at the full life cycle of the product being evaluated, from materials acquisition
to manufacturing, use, and end-of-life (i.e., final disposition). While this project assesses CRT
and LCD  technologies specifically, the model in this study provides a baseline LCA upon which
other technologies can be evaluated in the future.

NEED FOR  THE PROJECT
At present, CRT computer displays are used far more than any other display technology. CRT
monitors are relatively inexpensive and provide a rich, high-resolution display well suited to a
wide range of uses. CRT displays are bulky, however,  and are associated with disposal problems
with respect to with their leaded components. Newer technologies, collectively referred to as flat
panel displays (FPDs), exhibit desirable qualities, such as reduced size and weight and greater
portability, but currently are more expensive than CRT displays.  CRTs currently dominate the
desktop monitor market. At present, FPDs are used mainly in notebook computers, but their
, use in desktop monitors is increasing rapidly.  Of the several types of FPD technologies, this
study focused on active-matrix LCDs. Other FPD technologies were not included in the study
because they make up a small fraction of the market and are not targeted for desktop applica-
tions.  Market predictions indicate continued growth in  LCD market share, as shown in the  table
below.

Jpedfe

-------
           Desktop display markets — actual for 1998 and projected for 2001

Technology
CRT
Worldwide
North America
LCD
Worldwide
North America
Number of displays (thousands of units)
1998
88,600
33,801
1,300
229
2001
119,100
42,609
14,300 .
3,787
Source: DisplaySearch 200 J.                                                                ]

Given the expected market growth of LCDs, the various environmental concerns throughout the
life cycle of computer displays, and the fact that the relative life-cycle environmental impacts of
CRTs and LCDs had not been scientifically established to date, there was a need for an environ-
mental life-cycle analysis of both desktop computer display technologies.  As companies or
consumers consider investing in certain displays, they can refer to the results of this study to
assist them in making environmentally informed decisions.  Although this study does not make
recommendations or comparative assertions as to which display type is environmentally prefer-
able, manufacturers can use its results to identify areas for improvement concerning the product's
environmental burdens.  With this information, the U.S. electronics industry may be more
prepared to meet the global marketplaces growing demands of extended product responsibility,
becoming better able to meet competitive challenges worldwide.                           :

This booklet summarizes the key findings of the DfE Computer Display Project study. The
information is presented in ten sections, or questions.  The questions summarize:
   •   the study's life-cycle assessment methodology;                                      :
   •   the environmental impacts associated with the technologies evaluated;
   •   additional information on the health risks associated with lead, mercury, and liquid
      crystals;
   •   information on cost and performance; and                                         ;
   •   guidance on where to find more information.                                      r

For more detailed information on any of these topics, the reader is encouraged to reference the
full project report, Desktop Computer Displays: A Life-Cycle Assessment (EPA/744-R-01-004a and
b); Thedocumentmaybeviewedatwww.epa.gov/dfe.

-------
Question   1:
             is  a
The DฃE Computer Display Project (CDP) conducted this analysis of computer displays using a
life-cycle assessment (LCA) approach, which allows for a comprehensive analysis of the environ-
mental consequences of a product system over its entire life. LCA, which is increasingly being
used by industry, contains four major steps:
;   1.  Goal Definition and Scoping lays out why the LCA is being conducted, its intended use,
      and the system or data categories to be studied.
   2.  Life-Cycle Inventory (LCI) involves quantifying inputs (e.g., raw materials and fuel) and
      outputs (e.g., emissions, effluents, and products).
;   3.  Life-Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA) involves characterizing the effects of the inputs
      and outputs (as identified in the life-cycle inventory step) on the environment and human
      and ecological health.
   4.  Improvement Assessment or Life-Cycle Interpretation uses findings from the analysis to
      identify and evaluate opportunities for reducing life-cycle environmental impacts or to
      reach conclusions and recommendations. This step  is left to the electronics industry and
      others to complete, using the results of this study.

In the LCI and LCIA steps, the inputs and outputs and environmental  impacts associated with
the product throughout its life are quantified and characterized for each life-cycle stage: raw
material extraction, materials processing, product manufacturing, product use, and end-of-life.
Each of these major stages of the product life-cycle are described in Figure 1.1.

In addition to the LCA, the study incorporated some methodologies more typical of the EPA
Design for the Environment (DfE) Program's Cleaner Technologies Substitutes Assessment
(CTSA) approach.  Such an approach includes a more detailed assessment of the impacts of
specific chemicals, and an evaluation of comparative cost and performafice of different displays.
For this analysis, the DfE streamlined CTSA approach was incorporated by analyzing three
specific chemicals found  in computer displays (lead, mercury, and liquid crystals), and by
including a consideration of product costs and performance.

-------
Figure 1.1. Life-cycle stages of a computer display
Inputs Life-cycle stages Outputs
->
->
Materials
-ป
Energy
->
Resources .
->
Raw materials extraction/acquisition
Activities related to the acquisition of naturalresources, such as
mining and transporting raw materials to processing facilities.
Materials processing
Processing natural resources by reaction, separation,
purification, and alteration steps in preparation for the
manufacturing stage; and transporting processed materials to
product manufacturing facilities.
Product manufacture
Processing materials and assembling component parts to make
a computer display.
Product use, maintenance, and repair
Displays are transported to and used by customers.
Maintenance and repair may be conducted either at the
customer's location or taken back to a service center or
manufacturing facility.
End-of-life
At the end of its useful life, the display is retired. If reuse and
recycle of usable parts is feasible, the product can be
transported to an appropriate facility and disassembled. Parts
and materials that are not recoverable are then transported to
appropriate facilities and treated (if required or necessary)
and/or disposed of. ••'-..
-ป
-ป
Wastes
->
-^
Products
-ป

-------
Question   2:
Which
                                             the
This study evaluated two types of computer display technologies: cathode ray tubes (CRTs) and
liquid crystal displays (LCDs). In a life-cycle assessment (LCA), a "functional unit" is defined to
delineate the functional characteristics of the products being evaluated and allow them to be
'evaluated on an equivalent basis. For this study, die functional unit was defined as one desktop
computer display over its life. Data collected in diis project were normalized to. a display that
meets die functional unit specifications presented in Table 2.1.
                       Table 2.1.  Functional unit specifications
Specification
display size a
diagonal viewing area a
viewing area dimensions
resolution
brightness
contrast ratio
color
Measure
17" (CRT); 15" (LCD)
1 5.9" (CRT); 15" (LCD) ; •
12.8" x 9.5" (1 22 in2) (CRT); 12" x',9" (108 in2) ;:
(LCD) ....- : . :-.-• . -- '•;. :•" .
1 024 x 768 color pixels
200cd/m2 '.,.::--.
100:1 . -•; ; : . ;.. : :: :. : : , .•_..
262,000: colors : .
 "An LCD is manufactured such that its nearest equivalent to the 17" CRT display is the 15" LCD. The viewing area of a
 17" CRT is about 15.9' inches and the viewing area of a 15" LCD is 15 inches. LCDs are not manufactured to be exactly
 equivalent to the viewing area of the CRT.

 In addition to LCDs, several othes flat panel display technologies were considered for inclusion
 in the project; however, as these other technologies are not used for standard desktop computer
 displays (this study's functional unit), they were ultimately not included in die study. Each of
 the technologies included, CRTs and LCDs, is discussed in more detail below.

 CATHODE RAY TUBE DISPLAY
 CRT Technology
 CRT monitors are a mature technology and are the current industry standard for desktop
 computer displays.  The technology is the same as that for a television.  CRT displays use high
, voltages to accelerate electrons toward a luminescent material (phosphor) that is deposited on a
 faceplate. The phosphor converts the kinetic energy of die electrons into light.  The CRT must
 have excellent electrical insulating properties because die high voltages used to accelerate the
 electrons must be insulated from the external surfaces of the tube. The decelerating electrons
 produce X-rays, so the CRT must also be a good X-ray absorber. Leaded glass therefore sur-
 rounds the cathode ray tube to absorb the X-rays.

-------
The major parts of the CRT display are a faceplate (glass panel), a shadow mask (also referred to
as the aperture mask), a leaded glass funnel, and an electron gun with a deflection yoke. Various
connectors, wiring, an implosion band, printed wiring boards, and the casing comprise most of
the rest of the display. The overall project report, Desktop Computer Displays: A Life-Cycle
Assessment, provides a detailed list of each part in the CRT assembly, the subassemblies that make
up that part, and the materials in the manufacture of each component. To illustrate the level of
detail examined, an example of this detailed materials list is presented in Table 2.2 for the tube —
just one component of'the CRT display.                                               I

              Table 2.2. CRT display components and materials (excerpt)
Component parts
Tube

Faceplate
assembly
Frit
(lead solder
glass)
Conductively
coated funnel
Neck
Implosion
band
Phosphor-coated
faceplate
Internal electron
shield
Shadow mask
assembly
Glass
faceplate '*"
Phosphors -— >-
Photoresist — -- V
Black
matrix 	 .^.
coating
Lacquer
coating ~ ^
Aluminum
coating ~^"

^



Glass funnel
Conductive
coating
Frit
Binder
Neck glass
Deflection yoke
Base & top neck,
rings
Brass ring,
' brackets
Rubber gaskets
Screws, washers
Neck clamp
Insulating rings
Neck printed
wiring board
>'
^


	 w




w~
"^
	 , 	 	 _. • ^
"P"

^
	 -r

* - . w~.
Materials
Glass (1-2.5%>bO alkali/ alkaline
earth aluminosilicate)
ZnS, Y2O2S (powders): Sn, Si, K,
Cd
Polyvinyl alcohol . „
Aquadag
Mixture of alcohol and plastics
Aluminum
Aluminum
Steel, Ni
Lead oxide, zinc borate
(-70% PbO)
Leaded glass (- 24% PbO) :
Aquadag (may also add iron
oxide)
PbO, zinc oxide, boron oxide
Nitrocellulose binder, amyl
acetate- . .
Leaded glass (30% PbO
alkali/alkaline earth silicate)
Cu, ferrite
Polystyrene
Brass :
Rubber
Zn-plated steel
Steel
Polysulphone •'.
Misc. electronics and resin board
Steel ... '..

-------
CRT Manufacturing
The traditional CRT manufacturing process is generally composed of the steps shown in
Figure 2.1.
                        Figure 2.1. CRT manufacturing process.
                                                                                                  9ff*;ii?r?irii'Sปl"! ^ i'l-'I!frr"' ^Hj^^
                                                                                                                 ~~ T~a^ T"' ppr ~uT^F7Hfp I
                                    Glass fabrication
                             Faceplate (screen) preparation
                                     Shadow mask
                                  fabrication/assembly
                                   Funnel preparation
                                      Bulb joining
                                 Electron gun fabrication
                                     Final assembly
 Glass fabrication. The manufacturing process of the CRT monitor involves first preparing the
 glass. In glass manufacturing, raw materials (e.g., sand, soda ash, limestone, boron) are con-
 verted to a homogeneous melt at high temperatures and then formed into the panel (the face-
 plate on the front of the CRT) and the funnel (the back half of the CRT vacuum shell).

 Faceplate preparation. The faceplate, also referred to as a screen or panel, is coated with a
 conductive material known as aquadag. The aquadag acts as an anode, attracting the electrons
 emitted from the electron guns.  Luminescent phosphor materials are also applied to the inside
 surface of the faceplate. Using photolithography, the.phosphor is applied in a pattern of dots or
 stripes where red, green, and blue phosphors are deposited in subsequent steps. The result is a
 patterned luminescent screen with the emissive elements separated by non-reflecting material. A
 lacquer coating is applied to the phosphor-coated glass to smooth and seal the inside surface of
 the screen, and an aluminum coating is added to enhance brightness.

 Shadow mask fabrication and assembly. The shadow mask makes color images possible as
 electrons pass through the mask before hitting the precisely located colored regions of the
 faceplate.  The shadow mask is a thin steel panel with a mask pattern of either round or slotted
 openings applied through photolithography. The flat mask is fitted to the contour of the
 faceplate and supported in the faceplate on a heavy frame. Alignment fixtures and an internal
 magnetic shield are added to complete the faceplate assembly.
 Funnel preparation. The funnel provides the back half of the vacuum shell and electrically
 connects the electron gun and the faceplate to the anode button (a metal connector button in

-------
 the funnel provided for attachment of the power supply). A conductive coating similar to the
 type used on the faceplate is applied to the inner surface of the glass funnel. Frit (solder glass) is
 applied to the edge of the funnel to be joined with the faceplate.

 Bulb joining.  The faceplate assembly is placed on the fritted edge of the funnel in a fixture that
 carries the two halves in precise alignment through a high temperature oven, where the frit is;
 cured.  The resulting assembly is a vacuum tight bulb, ready to receive the electron gun and to be
 evacuated to become a finished CRT.                                                  i

 Electron gun fabrication. The electron gun is an assembly of glass and a number of electrostatic
 electrodes made of steel. The electrodes, along with cathodes, ribbon conductors, and electrical
 feed-through pins are heated to embed the metal parts in the glass.

 Final assembly. The frit-sealed bulb assembly and the electron gun assembly are joined by
 fusing a glass stem on the electron  gun with the neck tubing in a machine that melts the two
 glasses together in precise alignment. Final steps are conducted to remove the air from the CRT
 to form a vacuum, before the entire monitor is assembled with other necessary parts (e.g.,   -
 printed wiring boards, power cord, casing).                                             !

 LIQUID CRYSTAL  DISPLAY                                                      ;
 LCD Technology
 The two most common types of LCDs are passive matrix (PMLCD) and active matrix      ;
 (AMLCD). This project focused on AMLCDs because PMLCDs are used primarily for low-end
 products (e.g., products that cannot perform video applications) and are forecasted to decline to
 less than one percent of the LCD desktop display market by 2002. The most common type of
 AMLCD, and the one that meets the functional unit specifications of this project, is called an
 amorphous silicon thin-film transistor active matrix LCD.                                I

 In general, an LCD is composed of two glass plates surrounding a liquid crystal material that;
 filters external light.  LCDs control the color and brightness of each pixel (picture element)
 individually, rather than from one source, such as the electron gun in the CRT. The orientation
 of the liquid crystal molecules either allows or does not allow light from a backlight source to!
 pass through the display cell.  When no electrical current is present, the liquid crystals align  *
 themselves parallel to an alignment layer on the glass. When a current is applied, .the liquid
 crystals turn perpendicular to the glass. The combination of the alignment layer, electrical   ;
 charge, and polarizers that are laminated to the glass panels determine the on or off state of the
 LCD cell. The backlight supplies the light source for the display and generally has fluorescent
 tubes that contain small amounts of mercury vapor.  Because the LCD technology essentially
 regulates passage of a backlight through the display,  LCDs are considered non-emitting display
technologies. CRTs, on the other hand, emit electrons to illuminate appropriate phosphors and
are considered to be emitting displays.

-------
LCD Manufacturing
The LCD manufacturing process is more complex than the CRT process in terms of the types of
materials used and how the process steps are completed. A general overview of the manufactur-
ing process is shown in Figure 2.2 and described below.

                        Figure 2.2.  LCD manufacturing process
                                    Glass fabrication
                                 Front panel patterning
                                  Rear panel patterning
                                 Display cell assembly
                                    Module assembly
                                                                                                .


 Glass fabrication.  Molten glass (e.g., soda lime or borosilicate glass) is prepared into flat
 substrates. The glass sheets are trimmed to the required size and cleaned, which is a critical step
 in reliable manufacturing.

 Front panel patterning. The front panel electrode is created by sputtering indium tin oxide
 onto the glass. Next, a black matrk and red, green, and blue color filters is deposited and
 patterned (using a photolithography process) onto the panel. The black matrix creates a border
 around the color filters for contrast. The color filter process results in a non-uniform surface, so
 a layer of polyimide is added to create a planar surface. The last material added to the front
 panel is an alignment layer, which is a polyimide applied by roll coating and then rubbed to the
 desired molecular orientation.

 Rear panel patterning. The rear panel is where the transistors are created, requiring more
 complex  steps than the front panel. In the case of LCDs, the fast response speed required for
 computer displays is achieved by having a switch at each pixel, which is the basis for active-
 matrix addressing.  This switch is a transistor that basically consists of a gate, source and drain,
 and channel.  Electrons flow through the channel between the source and drain when voltage is
 applied to the gate. There is an insulating layer between the gate the source/drain region,
 referred to as  a dielectric.  The gate metal is applied first to the glass substrate and patterned.
 Next, a silicon-based dielectric, channel, and a doped silicon layer are applied and patterned as
 needed.  The pixel electrode is formed by sputtering indium tin oxide (also used to  create the
 front panel electrode). The source/drain metal is sputtered and patterned, and a contact is
 formed between this layer and the doped silicon layer.  The substrate is cleaned and a thin
 polymer  alignment layer is deposited onto the surface.  This layer is then rubbed in the direction
 desired for the liquid crystal orientation.

-------
Display cell assembly. At this stage of the process, the color filter substrate (front glass) and: the
transistor substrate (rear glass) are joined with an adhesive seal material. Before sealing the two
substrates, spacers are deposited to maintain a precise gap of five to ten micrometers between'the
two surfaces. The substrates are aligned and laminated using heat and pressure. Liquid crystal
material is then injected into the small space in between the substrates. The last step in the
display cell assembly is attaching polarizers (from rolls or precut sheets) to the outside of each
glass panel.

Module assembly. The module  assembly step includes attaching the backlight unit, which is
the light source for the LCD. A typical desktop unit has four backlights, which are placed
around the edges of the display. The light projects across a difruser screen to provide uniform
illumination. The printed wiring boards, the power supply assembly, and the plastic cover and
stand are added to make an assembled monitor.

-------
Question  3:

How                                                and



The environmental and health impacts of computer displays throughout their life cycles were
evaluated through two sequential processes: a life-cycle inventory (LCI) and a life-cycle impact
analysis (LCIA).

LIFE-CYCLE INVENTORY,
The LCI is the process of collecting information about the quantity of materials used (inputs)
and outputs of processes in each life-cycle stage. Quantitative inventory data for the processes in
the life cycles of the displays were provided by 22 display manufacturers.  Input information
included the materials found in the actual display, as well as energy requirements and ancillary
materials used during manufacturing.  Because there are not established guidelines in standard
LCA methodologies for determining where boundaries should be drawn for the analysis,, it was
decided the study would evaluate the impacts of inputs that met one or more of the following
criteria:
   •   constitutes more than one percent to the mass of a display;
   •   is known or suspected to have environmental significance (e.g., it is toxic);
   •   is known or suspected to have large energy requirements;
   •   is functionally significant to the display; and
   •   is physically unique to one of the displays (i.e., the material is found in a CRT but not in
       an LCD or vice versa).                                   .

 The following diagram demonstrates this selection process graphically.

                         Figure 3.1. Criteria for selecting inputs
                           MATERIAL/COMPONENT INPUTS:	
                                 • >5% of total mass,
                               • environmental concern
                                  • energy concern
                                 functionally significant
                                  • physically unique
                                 • 1 -5% of total mass
                _
               OJ

               1
               ฃ
               U
ซ <1 % of total mass
  • not otherwise
    significant
Excluded from
   sor unique*/  analysis
  *For example, materials are excluded if they are not of known environmental significance (e.g., toxic) or are not
  physically unique.
                                                                         pgjPi

                                                                                                     SB
                                                                                                                11

-------
 EPA also determined the outputs from each of the five life stages (i.e., materials extraction,   [
 materials processing, product manufacturing, product use, and end-of-life; see Figure 1.1) for
 each process included in the analysis. These outputs included air emissions, solid waste releases,
 and water effluents whenever appropriate and possible. Some information was collected specifi-
 cally for this study; for example, much of the material and energy use data for the product
 manufacturing stage was provided by display and component manufacturers.  Other data, such' as
 outputs from material extraction, were obtained from existing information sources.

 LIFE-CYCLE IMPACT ASSESSMENT
 Life-cycle impact assessment (LCIA) is the process in which the input and output data from an
 LCI are aggregated across all life stages and translated into impacts on human health and the
 environment. There were two steps in the CDP LCIA: classification and characterization.

 Classification
 In order to evaluate similar impacts together, each input and output in the LCI was placed into
 one or more of 20 impact categories.  These categories cover a range of effects that address
 natural resource impacts, abiotic ecosystem impacts, and human health and ecotoxicity.  Some:
 inputs and outputs can have multiple effects or impacts and are included in multiple categories.
 For example, methane is both a global warming gas and a photochemical smog contributor; this
 material is therefore represented in both of these impact categories.                        '

 Characterization
 The impacts of inputs and outputs are not necessarily commensurate with their weight or     :
 volume. For example, methane and carbon dioxide are both global warming gases, but methane
 is much more potent on a mass basis.  Conversion factors or scoring systems were therefore used
 for some impact categories to place different inputs  and outputs in common units.

The 20 impact categories and a description of each are presented in Table 3.1.

-------
Table 3.1. Impact categories

Impact Category

renewable resource
use
nonrenewable
resource
use/depletion
;energy use , .
solid waste landfill
use . :
tazardous waste
landfill Use
radioactive waste
landfill use

jlobal warming
stratospheric.ozone
depletion
jhotochemical smog
acidification
air quality (air
particulates)
water eutrophication
(nutrient enrichment)
water quality: BOD
water quality: TSS
radioactivity
Inventory Type
Input
Output
Description
Natural Resource Impacts
material,
water : - ".
material,
fuel . :
• - "
electricity,
fuel ;
• . __ — -
. • . •_.„ ,
-. • „„-.•. :

•]:"-- ; ;
. . - . • -. . • .
solid waste to
landfill-' •."•.'.:•:
hazardous, waste to
landfill
radioactive waste
to landfill •
Materials found in nature that are replenished through
natural processes. .:- , -.
Materials, such, as metals or fossil fuels, that are. not
regenerated naturally. . ;.. : .. ..
The amount of energy consumed. The impacts
associated with energy are included under other
impact categories. . ........... .
The volume of landfill space required for solid waste.
The volume of space required in a hazardous waste
landfilJ: "; '.": •••'..' . . : ' : :'.. 'v' :
The volume of waste disposed of at a radioactive waste
disposal facility, .''•.. . ; .,; : . ••. .. '.
Abiotic Ecosystem Impacts

—- _
- ____-
- ^ . , —

•• — — ;
- • 	 : .
	
• ,.__---.:••
air
air . _ .
air , .-:."'
air : v: ''.."•••
air •
water .
water V . " ••. :
• • - .
•-..'.'•'.'•• ' ' '•
'
water ,:
radioactivity to air,
water, or land
The mass of greenhouse gases emitted (chemical
amounts are weighted according to their potency
relative to carbon dioxide). -.-....
The .mass of ozone depleting chemicals emitted
(chemical amounts are weighted according to their
potency relative to CFC-1 1 ), .... .;•
The- mass of smog-producing chemicals emitted
(chemjcal amounts are weighted according to their
potency relative to, efhene). ...... ..
The mass of acidifying chemicals, emitted (chemical
amounts are weighted according to their potency
relative to sulfur dioxide). . _
The mass of particulates emitted that have a diameter
less than 1 0 micrometers.
The mass of eutrophication chemicals released .. . :
(chemical amounts are weighted according to their
potency relative to phosphate).
Amount of oxygen-consuming material released to
water [converted to Biological Oxygen Demand
(BOP)]... -.,; :• .-...: •-• ;•--.•
'Amount of suspended solids released to water.
The amount of radioactive chemicals released
(measured in Bequerels).
Human Health and Ecotoxicity
chronic human health
effects - occupational
chronic human health
effects- public
aesthetic impacts
(odor)
aquatic ecotoxicity
terrestrial ecotoxicity
material
.... -_-
-•-._... .
. .— .. .-
: ' "™" "•-'.
. •._„.-...
air, water.
air -.. .
water
air, water
. ".--'-•. ' . • ' •
Weighted score based on the amount and toxicity of
releases affecting workers4 . . .
Weighted score based on the amount and toxicity of
releases affecting the general public.
Volume of air released that is above odor detection
threshold. . . . :
Weighted score based on the amount and toxicity of
releases .affecting fish. ..
Weighted score based on the .amount arid toxicity of
releases affecting terrestrialorganisms.


-------
In addition to the general considerations of the LCA method discussed in Question 1, it should
also be noted that because display technology is constantly improving, displays often are dis-
carded while they are still functional.  To reflect this situation, the analysis was based on the
"effective" or typical life span of a display rather than the designed life span. Also, due to a lack
of transportation data for the manufacturing, use, and end-of-life stages, transportation impacts
were excluded for these stages, but in some instances were included in the existing data used for
the materials extraction and materials processing stages.        -                            :



-------
Question  4:

           are the                                and

                                                            •           '     .

This section presents a summary of the results for each impact category described in Question 3,
for which CRTs had associated impacts. Although some LCAs assign importance ranks or
weights to impact categories, this step was intentionally excluded from dais study because it
requires subjective choices that might not be appropriate for all stakeholders with an interest in
this project. Table 4.1 identifies the process that contributes most significantly to each impact
category.                                       •

               Table 4.1. Summary of most significant CRT processes
Impact category
Most significant process
Associated
life stage
Percent
contribution to
category score
Natural Resource Impacts
renewable resource
use
nonrenewable
resource use/depletion
energy use
solid waste landfill use
fazardous waste
landfill use
radioactive waste
landfill use
LPG production for glass ~ , -
manufacturing
LPG production for glass
manufacturing
LPG production for glass
manufacturing
coal waste from electricity generation
landfilled CRT monitor ,
low-level radioactive waste from
electricity generation
manufacturing
manufacturing
manufacturing
use
end of life,
use
Abiotic Ecosystem Impacts
jlobal warming
stratospheric ozone
depletion
Dhotochemical smog
acidification ; .
air quality (air
particulatesj
water eutrophication
(nutrient enrichment)
water quality: BOD
water quality: TSS
radioactivity
carbon dioxide from electricity
generation
bromomethane from coal burned for
electricity generation .
hydrocarbons from energy generation
used for LPG production for glass
manufacturing
sulfur dioxide from electricity
generation
particulate matter from energy
generation used for LPG production
for glass manufacturing
chemical oxygen demand from energy
generation used for LPG production
for glass manufacturing
BOD from energy generation used for
LPG production for glass
manufacturing ..-••-
TSS from energy generation used for
LPG production for glass
manufacturing
Plutonium released from energy
generation used for steel production
use
use
manufacturing
use
manufacturing
manufacturing
manufacturing
manufacturing
upstream
79%
56%
72%
38%
91%
61 % - . -

64%
. 49%
36%
47%
43%
72%
96%
97%
62%




	 ' . continued on next page

-------
             Table 4.1. Summary of most significant CRT processes (continued)
Impact category
Most significant process
Associated
life stage
Percent
contribution to
category score
Human Health and Ecotoxicity
chronic human health
effects - occupational
chronic human health
effects - public
aesthetic impacts
(odor)
aquatic ecotoxicity
terrestrial ecotoxicity
LPG used for glass manufacturing
Sulfur dioxide from fossil fuels burned
for electricity generation
Hydrogen sulfide from energy
generation used for LPC production
for glass manufacturing
phosphorous used in CRT tube
manufacturing 	
Sulfur dioxide from fossil fuels burned
for electricity generation
manufacturing
use
manufacturing
manufacturing
use
78%
83%
. 94% -.
26%
83%

 "Acronyms: liquified petroleum gas (LPG), paniculate matter with diameter less than 10 micrometers (PM ), biological
 oxygen demand (BOD), total suspended solids (TSS).                            .                   i.

 NATURAL RESOURCE IMPACTS                                                 :
 Renewable resource use. Renewable resources are materials-found in nature that generally are
 replenished through natural processes. The most significant examples are water and forest   '
 products. The CRT manufacturing life stage creates the largest impact with respect to renewable
 resource consumption, representing 87 percent of the total in this impact category.  More
 specifically, the production of liquified petroleum gas (LPG),, which is subsequently used as an
 energy source in the glass manufacturing process, contributed nearly 80 percent alone to the  *
 impact score due to the water requirements of LPG manufacturing.                       • •'

 Nonrenewable resource use/depletion. Nonrenewable resources are materials, such as metals or
 fossil fuels, that are not readily regenerated naturally. The depletion of LPG reserves for glass ;
 manufacturing creates the largest impact in the CRT life cycle. The petroleum used to make
' LPG contributed 56 percent of the mass of nonrenewable resources used. Much of the remain-
 ing resource use is associated with  other fuels.  Less than two percent by weight of the nonrenew-
 able resources used were actually incorporated into the CRT (i.e., were processed into metals, \
 plastics, or other materials).                                                             ;

 Energy use. This impact category considers only energy consumed during a display's life cycle;
 it does not include the releases associated with energy production. (Those effects are reported
 under other appropriate impact categories.)  Most of the energy use associated with  the CRT life
 cycle is consumed during the glass/frit manufacturing process (72 percent on a megajoule basis).
 Electricity consumed during die use of CRTs represented an additional 11 percent.           -

 Solid waste landfill use.  By consuming space in a landfill, solid waste necessitates the use of ',
 open land. The largest demand for solid waste space is caused by the use life stage.  Solid wastes
 (primarily coal wastes) are created during the generation of electricity.  Interestingly, based on ah
 end-of-life scenario assuming that 15 percent of CRTs are incinerated, 71 percent are landfilled
 (46 percent as hazardous waste, 25  percent as solid waste),  and 14 percent are recycled or     '
 remanufactured, the end-of-life stage of the CRT has a beneficial effect on solid waste landfill

-------
\xse. Ttxe solid waste avoided by recovering energy to generate electricity during CRT incinera-
tion (i.e., the solid waste that would have been generated from fossil fuel-burning electricity
plants) more than offsets the volume of a CRT that is landfilled.

Hazardous waste landfill use. Hazardous waste consists of materials that are regulated under
the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. Like solid waste, this material contributes to the
: consumption of open land but also demands additional safety and environmental protection
precautions.  In contrast to the results for solid waste landfill use, the largest life stage for this
impact category is the end-of-life stage.  Over 90 percent of the weight disposed of in a hazard-
ous waste landfill is attributed to the CRT itself.

Radioactive waste landfill use.  Like hazardous waste, radioactive waste contributes to the
consumption of open land and creates safety and environmental challenges.  Nearly 80 percent
of the CRT material disposed of in a radioactive waste landfill results from the electricity con-
; sumed during CRT use. This material principally is low-level radioactive waste and depleted
uranium produced by nuclear power plants.

ABIOTIC ECOSYSTEM  IMPACTS
'. Global warming. Gases such as carbon dioxide and methane trap heat in the atmosphere. It is
• believed that by increasing the concentrations of these gases, humans are causing the atmosphere
to become warmer and induce global climate change. Electricity consumption during the use of
CRTs is the largest contributor of global warming impacts; carbon dioxide produced by power
! plants contributed 64 percent of the global warming potential associated with CRTs. This result
should be compared with the energy use findings. Although CRT use is not the most significant
life stage for energy use, electricity production generates considerably more carbon dioxide per
 unit of energy than LPG or other fossil fuels used directly.

 Stratospheric ozone depletion. The stratospheric ozone layer blocks harmful ultraviolet (UV)
 sunlight from reaching the earth's surface. Chemicals such as chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) may
 destroy ozone in the stratosphere, causing an increase in UV radiation on the earth's surface.
 The largest contributor to ozone depletion (weighted according to potency) is electricity produc-
 tion for CRT use. Bromomethane, an ozone depleting compound, is produced during the
 combustion of coal,  CFCs  used in  the manufacture of some CRT materials are also an issue. It
 should be noted  that the calculations for this impact category are uncertain because some
 secondary data for materials processing were collected prior to the phase-out of CFCs.

, Photochemical smog. Photochemical smog is produced in the atmosphere by the reaction of
 hydrocarbons and nitrogen oxides in the presence of sunlight.  Smog may cause or aggravate
 health problems, toxicity in plants,  and deterioration of materials. The largest contributor to this
 impact category  was the production of LPG used to manufacture glass.  This process emitted
 chemicals that accounted for 67 percent of the photochemical smog.

 Acidification. The release  of acids into the  air causes acid rain. Acid rain in turn harms surface
 water, soil, and plants. The production of electricity for the use of CRTs was the largest source
 of acidifying emissions. This process produced sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and hydrochloric
 acid to contribute 63 percent to the overall score for this category.



"^•fSKiS^^S I
       I



-------
 Air quality (participate matter). Particulates in the air, especially those that have a diameter
 smaller than 10 micrometers (PM10), can cause respiratory illnesses in humans and animals.
 Two processes that significantly affect this impact category are LPG production for glass manu-
 facturing, and steel production (in the materials processing life stage). It should be noted that
 because some of the output data did not specify the size of the particulates, some of the results
 for PM10 might be overestimated.

 Water eutrophication (nutrient enrichment).  In most surface water, the level of biological ;
 activity is limited by the concentration of nitrogen and phosphorous. When these two nutrients
 are released to water, fast-growing organisms such as algae outcompete established organisms
 such as fish. LPG production for glass manufacturing was the source of roughly 90 percent of!
 the impacts in this category.  This process released chemical oxygen demand-related chemicals^
 and ammonia ions.                                                                '     i

 Water quality (BOD).  Organic chemicals that are released to water ultimately lead to a deple-
 tion of dissolved oxygen, which in turn reduces the survival rate of organisms such as fish. One
 measure of this impact is biological oxygen demand (BOD). As for water eutrophication, LPG
 production was the source of most (96 percent) of the impacts in this category.               ;

 Water quality (TSS).  In turbid (cloudy) water, only a fraction of the usual amount of sunlight
 penetrates the water. As a result, less sunlight reaches plants and other dependent organisms and
 less biological activity occurs.  Total suspended solids (TSS) indicates the magnitude of this effect
 for a stream of wastewater. LPG production is the primary influence (97 percent) for this impact
 category.

 Radioactivity. Radioactive materials  released to the environment can cause cancer in humans ,
• and animals. Nearly all of the radioactivity releases are associated with materials processing,
 particularly steel, invar, and ferrite. Specifically, the impacts result from reprocessing nuclear fuel
 used to generate electricity at steel, invar, and ferrite facilities outside the United States. Because
 reprocessing is-not conducted in the U.S., only a minute amount of radioactivity release is
 associated with electricity consumption during CRT use.

 HUMAN HEALTH AND ECOTOXICITY                                          <
 Chronic human health effects - occupational. Workers might experience health effects,
 including cancer, from long term exposure to materials associated with computer displays. LPG
 used in glass manufacturing accounted for much of the impact score in this category.

 Chronic human health effects - public.  Members of the general public might be at risk of
 developing adverse health effects, including cancer, due to air or water releases from the life cycle
 of computer displays. The largest impact on the public is the sulfur dioxide (SO2) released due
 to electricity generation for CRT use.  SO2 produced for the product use stage contributed 83
 percent of the score because of this pollutant's relatively high non-cancer hazard value and high
 release rate.

Aesthetic impacts (odor). Some air emissions may be released in concentrations that are
 detectable by smell. Odor does not by itself represent a human health or environmental prob- ,

-------
 iem, but it is considered a nuisance. Hydrogen sulfide produced during the production of LPG
 for glass manufacturing generated the largest odor impact. This chemical accounted for 94
 percent of the impacts in this category.

 Aquatic ecotoxicity.  Organisms that live in water, particularly fish, can be harmed by toxic
 chemicals released to water.  The results were broadly distributed.  Phosphorous, used in the
 manufacturing life-cycle stage to produce the CRT tube, was the most significant contributor but
 accounted for only 26 percent of the impact score.  Other materials contributing significantly to
 •the aquatic ecotoxicity score included aluminum, copper, and zinc from the materials processing
 stage.                                                                     ,

 Terrestrial ecotoxicity. Organisms living on land can be adversely affected by toxic chemicals, in
 the air or in surface water. Results for this impact category are based on the effects on rodents.
 As for chronic public health effects, SO2 produced during electricity generation for CRT use was
 •the most significant material. In large part, this similarity resulted because the same non-cancer
 toxicity rating for SO2 applies for both impact categories.

  COMPARISON ACROSS CRT LIFE STAGES
 As shown in Figure 4.1, the manufacturing life-cycle stage was the largest contributor in  11 of
 the 20 impact categories. In most cases, this was due to the very high requirements of LPG in
•. the glass manufacturing process and the associated environmental impacts of processing that
 LPG. CRT use was important in seven of the impact categories, due mainly to the diverse
 : impacts of electricity generation. It is important to note that the figure does not indicate the
 ^overall magnitude of impacts in each life-cycle stage; it was beyond the scope of the project to
 weigh the relative importance of each impact category.  Instead, the figure indicates the areas in
  the CRT life cycle where the effects of certain processes may be more multifaceted or wordry of
  further investigation.
                      Figure 4.1. Distribution of Largst CRT  Impacts
-a
|
ฃ 10 -
CC
_y
DO 8
ts
o
26"
DO 4 ~
s
U
tJ 2
(0
Q_
E


















IS"


s

I
^^™"


i
ฎ
ป
Ilksssw"*
^MI
gfci.j""







IP
IP
I*





^^fe':-|^:->_'|[
^^.•^j^ty -fl

2 Materials^ Materials Manufacturing Product Use End of Life
-| Extraction Processing
z ' ' '.


-------

 Question  5:
 What  are  the                                     '      :
 health  impacts of
 Like CRTs, LCDs had impacts associated with each impact category; this section presents a
 summary of the results. Table 5.1 identifies the processes that contribute most significantly to
 each impact category.
              Table 5.1. Summary of most significant LCD processes
Impact category
Most significant process
Associated
life stage
Percent
contribution
to category
score ;
Natural Resource Impacts
renewable resource use
nonrenewable resource
use/depletion
energy use
solid waste landfill use
hazardous waste landfill
use
radioactive waste landfill,
use
water use in LCD module manufacturing
natural gas extraction
electricity consumed for LCD use
coal waste from electricity generation
landfilled LCD monitor
low-level radioactive waste from electricity
generation
upstream
upstream
use.
. . use
end of life
use
38%
65% '
30%
44%
' 97%
44%
Abiotic Ecosystem Impacts
global warming
stratospheric ozone
depletion
jhotochemical smog
acidification
air quality (air particulates)
water eutrophication
nutrient enrichment)
water quality: BOD
water quality: TSS
radioactivity
sodium hexafluoride in LCD module
manufacturing
HCFC-225 in LCD component manufacturing
non-methane hydrocarbons from natural gas
production
sulfur dioxide from electricity generation
particulate matter from energy generation used
for steel production
nitrogen from LCD module manufacturing
BOD from LCD module manufacturing
TSS from LPG production for LCD glass
manufacturing
plutonium released from energy generation
used for steel production
manufacturing
manufacturing
upstream
use
use
manufacturing
manufacturing
manufacturing
.upstream
Human Health and Ecotoxicity
chronic human health
effects - occupational
chronic human health
effects - public
aesthetic impacts (odor)
aquatic ecotoxicity
terrestrial ecotoxicity
LPG used for LCD glass manufacturing
sulfur dioxide from fossil fuels burned for
electricity generation
phosphine from LCD module manufacturing
phosphorous from LCD module manufacturing
sulfur dioxide from fossil fuels burned for
electricity generation
manufacturing
use
manufacturing
manufacturing
manufacturing
29%
, 34%
45%
31%
45% :
67%
61%
66%
96%

58% :
68%
89%
98%
68% :
'Acronyms: liquified petroleum gas (LPG), hydrochlorofluorocarborv(HCFC), particulate matter with diameter less than
10 micrometers (PM10), biological oxygen demand (BOD), total suspended solids (TSS).


-------
 NATURAL RESOURCE IMPACTS
 Renewable resource use. Renewable resources are materials found in nature that generally are
 'replenished through natural processes. The most significant examples are water and forest
 products. The manufacturing life stage accounted for over 75 percent of the renewable resource
 .use. The most water-intensive manufacturing steps were LCD monitor manufacturing and the
 production of liquified petroleum gas (LPG)  used in glass manufacturing.

 Nonrenewable resource use/depletion. Nonrenewable resources are materials, such as metals or
 fossil fuels,  that are not readily regenerated naturally. The vast majority of nonrenewable re-
 source use (97  percent on a mass basis) is associated with the depletion of fossil fuels. The largest
. single process step is the  depletion of natural gas in the materials processing life stage.

 Energy use. This impact category considers  only the energy consumed during a display's life
 cycle; it does not include the releases associated with energy production. (Those effects are
 reported under other appropriate impact categories.) The electricity consumed during LCD use
 is the largest single contributor to the energy use results.  Other energy-intensive processes
 i include LCD glass manufacturing, which uses LPG and electricity, and natural gas production,
 which uses unprocessed natural gas.

 Solid waste landfill use. By consuming space in a landfill, solid waste necessitates the use of
 . open land.  Most of the solid waste  (65 percent by weight)  is associated with electricity produc-
 tion for LCD use. This solid waste  material includes coal waste, dirt/sludge, and fly/bottom ash.
 Like CRTs, LCDs are calculated to  reduce solid waste landfill use in the end-of-life stage, because
 the incineration of some LCDs and the resulting energy offsets the solid waste impacts of
 landfilled displays and fossil fuel-derived energy.

 \ Hazardous waste landfill use. Hazardous waste consists of materials regulated under  die
 Resource Conservation and Recovery Act.  This material has the same space requirements as solid
 i waste and also demands  additional  safety and environmental protection precautions. The
 landfilling  of LCDs produced most of the impacts in this category, even though only five percent
 of LCDs were expected to be landfilled. Hazardous waste from LPG production and acedc acid
 from LCD monitor manufacturing represent the remaining amount.

 Radioactive waste landfill use. Like hazardous waste, radioactive waste contributes to the
 consumption of open land and creates safety and environmental challenges.' The wastes in this
 impact category are low-level radioactive waste and depleted uranium generated during electricity
 production at nuclear power plants.

 ABIOTIC ECOSYSTEM  IMPACTS
 Global warming. Gases such as carbon dioxide and methane trap heat in the atmosphere. It is
 believed that by increasing the concentrations of these gases, humans are causing the atmosphere
 to grow warmer and induce global  climate change.  Several processes contributed to the global
 warming impact of LCDs. Sulfur hexafluoride used in the LCD module manufacturing process .
 contributed 29 percent of the global warming potential of LCDs.  Most of the remaining
 1 impacts were caused by  carbon dioxide released during electricity generation for LCD  use and
 during natural gas production.


-------
 Stratospheric ozone depletion. The stratospheric ozone layer blocks harmful ultraviolet (UV)
 sunlight from reaching the earth's surface. Chemicals such as chlorofluorocarbons may destroy
 ozone in the stratosphere, causing an increase in UV radiation on the earth's surface.  Roughly
 60 percent of the impacts in this category were caused by hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs)
 used in manufacturing LCD panel components.  Unlike the CFCs that contributed significantly
 to CRT ozone depletion impacts, the HCFCs used to manufacture LCD panel components are
 not scheduled for phaseout until 2015. Another 27 percent of ozone depletion impacts was !
 contributed by electricity generation for LCD use, which released bromomethane during the
 combustion of coal.

 Photochemical smog.  Photochemical smog is produced in the atmosphere by the reaction of
 hydrocarbons and nitrogen oxides in the presence of sunlight.  Smog may cause or aggravate  ;
 health problems, toxicity in plants, and deterioration of materials.  Approximately 75 percent of
 the photochemical smog results were caused by natural gas production in the materials process-
 ing life-cycle stage.  Important releases included methane, benzene, and other non-methane   ',_
 hydrocarbons.

 Acidification. The release of acids into the air causes acid precipitation, which in turn harms '
 surface water, soil, and plants.  Roughly 40 percent of the impacts in this category were caused
 by sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides released during electricity generation for product use.
 Other important processes include natural gas production, which released nitrogen oxides,
 ammonia, and sulfur oxides; and LCD module manufacturing, which produced nitrogen oxides,
 ammonia, hydrofluoric acid, and hydrochloric acid.                                       ;

 Air quality (particulate matter). Particulates in the air, especially those that have a diameter
 smaller than 10 micrometers, can cause respiratory illnesses in humans and animals. The largest
 contributor to this impact category was steel production in the materials processing life stage. '
 This process accounted for 45 percent of the particulate matter released by weight. Natural gas
 production contributed an additional 25 percent to the overall amount of particulate matter.
                                                                                      I
Water eutrophication (nutrient enrichment).  In most surface water, the level of biological
 activity is limited by the concentration of nitrogen and phosphorous. When these two nutrients
 are released to water, fast-growing organisms such as algae outcompete established organisms  i
 such as fish. Most of the nutrient enrichment (94 percent) was caused during the LCD module
 manufacturing process; nitrogen and phosphorous were both released.

Water quality (BOD).  Organic chemicals that are  released to water ultimately lead to a depler
 tion of dissolved oxygen, which in turn reduces the survival rate of organisms such as fish. One
 measure of this impact is biological oxygen demand (BOD). The LCD module manufacturing
process generated most of the BOD output from the LCD life cycle; it accounted for 61 percent
of the score in this impact category.  LPG  production was another significant source of BOD. \

Water quality (TSS). In turbid (cloudy) water, only a fraction of the usual amount of sunlight
penetrates the water. As a result, less sunlight reaches plants and other dependent organisms  and
less biological activity occurs.  Total suspended solids (TSS)  indicates the magnitude of this effect

-------
for a stream of wastewater. LPG production generated the largest amount of TSS; 66 percent of
the TSS resulted from this process.

Radioactivity.  Radioactive materials released to the environment can cause cancer in humans
and animals.  As with CRTs, nearly all of the estimated radioactivity impacts of LCDs were
associated with  steel produced in countries that reprocess nuclear fuel.  Only a small amount of
radioactivity is released by nuclear power plants in the United States.

HUMAN HEALTH AND ECOTOXICITY
.Chronic human health effects - occupational. "Workers might experience health effects,
including cancer, from long-term exposure to materials associated with computer displays.
Liquified natural gas, which is used in LCD module manufacturing, was the single most signifi-
cant material for this impact category. The sulfuric acid used in the same process also was
significant. Together, these two chemicals accounted for 81 percent of the score.

Chronic human health effects - public. Members of the general public might be at risk of
developing adverse health effects, including cancer, due to air or water releases from a life-cycle
stage of computer displays.  The SO2 released during electricity production was the largest
contributor to the public health effects category. The largest share was attributed to electricity
consumed for LCD use (68 percent of the score), and another 21 percent was attributed to
•electricity use in LCD manufacturing.

Aesthetic impacts (odor).  Some air emissions may be released in concentrations that are
detectable by smell. Odorjioes not by itself represent a  human health or environmental prob-
lem, but it is considered a nuisance. Most of the odor generated in the LCD life cycle was
^attributed to phosphine, which was emitted in the LCD module manufacturing process. Hydro-
gen sulfide released during LPG production also contributed a small amount to the total im-
pacts.

Aquatic ecotoxicity.  Organisms that live in water, particularly fish, can be harmed by toxic
chemicals released to water. Nearly all of the aquatic ecotoxicity impacts were from phospho-
'. rous, which was released to wastewater during the LCD  module manufacturing process.

Terrestrial ecotoxicity. Organisms living on land can be adversely affected by toxic chemicals in
the air or in surface water.  Results  for this impact category are based on the effects on rodents.
As with the public health impact category, SO2 from electricity generation is the primary source
of toxicity to land-based organisms. The electricity used in the LCD use life stage accounted for
68 percent of the indicator score, and the electricity used in manufacturing accounted for an
additional 21 percent.

 COMPARISON ACROSS LCD LIFE STAGES
Figure 5.1 indicates the number of impact categories for which each life stage was the largest ,
contributor.  As with CRTs, manufacturing and product use most frequently were the largest
contributors for an impact  category. Glass manufacturing and the associated fuel requirements
were a significant cause of impacts  in the manufacturing life stage.  Other materials used in LCD
ฐ!i;^Hiซ?%i4!^^

 "iiiLflTrji^piii:^




-------
manufacturing, such as phosphorous- and nitrogen-containing compounds, were also important


contributors to some of the impacts related to water quality. In the product use life stage, energy


consumption significantly affected several of the impact categories.                        '
                    Figure 5.1. Distribution of Largest LCD Impacts
   I
    c

    s
   ^

    Dp
   In
    _
    o
    QO
   u
   4—1
   u
   CO
   Q.

   E
   3

   z
Materials      Materials

Extraction     Processing
Manufacturing   Product Use     End of Life

-------
Question  6:
                                               the
                                  and
CRTs have greater life-cycle impacts than LCDs in most impact categories. The results of the
LCIA show that the CRT has greater total life-cycle impacts than the LCD in 18 of the 20
impact categories. The LCD has greater impacts in only two categories: eutrophication and
aquatic toxicity. Note, however, that these results do not indicate the magnitude of die impact
itself or the magnitude of die difference between impacts for the CRT and LCD. Additionally,
in die ozone depletion category, the analysis included substances that were phased out of produc-
tion by 1996 by the countries that were signatories to the Montreal Protocol.  When phased-out
substances are removed from the inventories, the results for die p/one depletion category are
reversed, with die LCD having the greatest impacts.

Manufacturing is the life-cycle stage with the greatest impacts.  When considering which life-
cycle stage has greater impacts, die LCIA results showed that the manufacturing life-cycle stage
dominates impacts for most impact categories for both the CRT and LCD. Table 6.1 summa-
rizes which life-cycle stages have the greatest impacts for each impact category. As shown in the
table, nine out of the 20  impact categories showed the greatest impacts during the manufacturing
stage for the CRT, and 11 of the 20 categories showed die greatest impacts during the manufac-
turing stage for the LCD. Impacts were greatest from the use stage for six of the 20 categories
for the CRT, and for four of the 20 categories for the LCD. Impacts were greatest from the
upstream life-cycle stage  (i.e., raw material extraction plus materials processing) in three catego-
ries for both the CRT and LCD.  Impacts were greatest from the end-of-life stage for the same
two impact categories (hazardous waste landfill use and radioactive waste landfill use) for both
the CRT and LCD..

Energy generation and  use in  the CRT life-cycle is the largest contributor in almost all
impact categories. The largest contributor in 18 of the 20 impact categories for CRTs is related
to energy generation and use. Energy use in glass manufacturing and associated production of
LPG drive the CRT results in ten impact categories, including overall life-cycle energy use. The
generation of electricity for the  use stage dominates seven impact categories. The only categories
in which energy is not a  major contributor are hazardous waste landfill use (where landfilled
CRTs have the greatest impact)  and aquatic ecotoxicity (where phosphorous used in CRT
manufacturing is the largest contributor).

More information is needed on energy used in CRT glass manufacturing. The large amount
of LPG reported for glass manufacturing was originally questioned during the data collection
and verification stage of this project. A sensitivity analysis was conducted where the glass energy
data were modified. The overall energy required to produce a kilogram of CRT glass in the
original analysis was nearly 100 times greater than that in the modified scenario. As a result, the

-------
CRT modified glass energy scenario had greater energy use impacts in the use stage than in the
manufacturing stage. It is likely that the actual energy inputs are somewhere between the
baseline and modified glass scenarios, but additional information is needed to verify this assump-
tion.

Energy use and generation also impacted many categories in the LCD life-cycle. Impact;
results for LCDs were, less sensitive than those for CRTs to an individual input or output,
although energy still played a prominent role. The most significant contributor in 12 of the 20
impact categories was energy related.
 Table 6.1.  Life-cycle stage with greatest impact for each display, by impact category
Impact category
Renewable resource use
Nonrenewable resource use
Energy use
Solid waste landfill use
Hazardous waste landfill use
Radioactive waste landfill use
Global warming
Ozone depletion
Photochemical smog
Acidification
Air particulates
Water eutrophication
Water quality, BOD
Water quality, TSS
Radioactivity
Chronic health effects, occupational
Chronic health effects, public
Aesthetics (odor)
Aquatic toxicity
Terrestrial toxicity
TOTALS
Life-cycle stage with greatest impacts
Upstream
LCD






__J
LCD


CRT


CRT, LCD

Manufacturing .
CRT
CRT/LCD
CRT, LCD



LCD
LCD
CRT


LCD
CRT, LCD
CRT, LCD

CRT/LCD
f
i CRT, LCD
CRT

CRT=3
LCD=3
LCD -
CRT, LCD
CRT=9
LCD=11
Use



CRT, LCD
, t, i i* ' f

CRT
CRT

CRT/LCD
CRT, LCD





CRT, LCD
'•• '•••• 	 ••


CRT=6
LCD=4
EOL;

•


CRT, LC.D
CRT, LCD

<


•

;.:-'.:V;; |v-


;..-."",;."' I ;-^l".


• .; .. -• ' •',- ' <• '-

CRT=2
'1CR=2_'.,

-------
Question  7:

What are  the                            and

                                          the  two

technologies!

Although the study summarized in this booklet focused on the environmental effects associated
with computer displays, comparative cost and performance information are the other obvious
considerations in a company's or consumer's decision-making. A complete analysis of cost and
performance was beyond the scope of this study; however, summary performance and cost
information are presented here.

COMPUTER DISPLAY PERFORMANCE
Performance data and costs for monitors on the market at the time of the study were collected
(summer, 2001) and are presented in Table 7.1.
  Table 7.1. Performance data and cost collected for some currently selling displays3
Monitor3
Display size
(inches)
Resolution
(pixels)
Brightness
(cd/m2)
Contrast ratio
Number of
colors
CRTs
vtonitor 1
Monitor 2
Monitor 3
17/1.6 -
17/16.1
17/16
1280x1040
1280x1040
• •- ' .'.-
1600x1200
- _. •---• •;•;•"-
'.-'".' "'• :
".'. '"••("' • ': •'
..'.'. - :
:- "High contrast, antir
'•' '•'_ static, anti-glare • .- .
coating.":: .
1 '." '• ". : '___ • '•' ' .
-•-.-- : .,: .
• . . — —
.;._::.•->'•-,-. '•'•
2001
cost

$158
$171
$316
LCDs
Monitor 1
Monitor 2b
Monitors
Monitor 4b
Monitor 5
15.1 .
15.1
15.1
15.1 :
15
1024x768
1024x768
1024x768 '".
1024x768
1 024x768
•v' --"-:. '• •
J 200 :
200C
200 :
21 Oc
200:1
:' 250:1:
-.--.- . :
, ::200:1c:;
:.•;• v..:.-.-.250:T.-.;- •.:.-..-
':•.:• ...;350:1 \
16.7 million
16.7 million
16+ million
16.7 million
' / • , ' ' ' /
$349
$400
$439
$499
$554
 a All information from Vol. EC23 of the eCOST.com catalog, except where noted otherwise.
 b Data from manufacturer's web site except for prices, which were obtained from http://www.cdw.com.
 c Data from manufacturer's web site.


 Performance of computer displays can be based on many factors, but is focused mainly on the

 ' quality of the image on the screen. This quality can be measured in terms such as display size,

 resolution, dot pitch, brightness, and contrast ratio.  The performance characteristics presented

 in the table above include the following.



-------
 Display size. The CRT size advertised is generally not the size of the image on the screen, but
 the nominal size of the entire faceplate, including the part that is not visible. Instead, the
 viewable-image size (VIS), which is the diagonal measurement of the image on the screen, is the
 more meaningful metric.  The VIS is typically about an inch smaller than the nominal size. An
 LCD's VIS is the same as its nominal size, making a 15-inch LCD nearly the equal of a 17-inch
 CRT. (The 17-inch CRT provides about 14 percent more viewable area than the 15-inch LCD.)

 Resolution. This refers to the number of picture  elements,  or pixels, that constitute an image.
 Computer displays can usually can be set at various resolutions, with the higher resolutions
 showing more detail.  A resolution of 1,024x768 can render flicker-free images.  Displays may
 have noticeable image degradation when set at any resolution lower than 1,024x768 pixels, where
 images look smeared and text can become harder to read.

 Brightness. Reported in cd/m2 (candela per square meter), dais is a measurement of the    |
 display's maximum brightness.  A range of brightness allows the user to adjust the brightness for
 well-lit uses (where maximum brightness is  needed) to  dark settings.

 Contrast ratio. The contrast ratio of an LCD is defined as the ratio of brightness (or luminance)
 of the pixel to the background, or the ratio of peak white to  black level. The larger the contrast
 ratio, the deeper the blacks and the brighter the whites, improving the display's ability to show
 subde color details and tolerate  extraneous room light.

 Number of colors. Refers to the total number of colors possible.

 2001 Cost. Prices were obtained from  the website of CDW Computer Centers, Inc.        '
 (www.cdw.com) on August 29, 2001.

 COMPUTER DISPLAY COSTS — USE STAGE                                    ;
 Costs from the use stage of the computer display life are primarily electricity costs.  The average
 cost of residential and commercial electricity in the U.S. is approximately $0.021/MJ and the :
 CRT and LCD monitors use about 2,290 and 853 MJ/functional unit, respectively, in the use!
 stage. The electricity costs to consumers during the use stage are therefore $48 for the CRT and
 $18 for the LCD. The amount of electricity consumed and the associated cost of that electricity
 for each life-cycle stage are presented in  Table 7.2.                                        ;

This cost information represents only a  small part of all the components of cost that would be
considered in a thorough cost analysis. A complete cost analysis would require assessing the costs
from each life-cycle stage, and would include both  direct costs (e.g., material costs) and indirect
costs (e.g., environmental costs to society). While such a detailed analysis was beyond the scope
of this study, some of the costs that should be considered in a complete cost analysis include:
  •  material costs;
  •  production costs (e.g., labor, transportation of material);
  •   maintenance costs (e.g., equipment maintenance, line set-up);
  •   capital costs (e.g., equipment procurement, installation, and facility floor space);

-------
      utility costs (e.g., water, electricity, natural gas);
      licensing/permit cost (e.g., wastewater discharge, air emissions); and
      environmental treatment costs (e.g., wastewater, air, hazardous waste treatment).

                          Table 7.2.  Life-cycle electricity costs
.
Life-cycle
stage
Upstream
Manufacturing
Use
End-of-life
Total
CRT
Electricity use
(MJ/functional
unit)
73.2
129
2,290
0.229 ,.-.
2,492
Unit
cost
($/MJ)
0,01 2a
0.012a
0.02 1b
0.0 i2a
—
Cost
($US)
$1.3
$1,5
$48
$0.003
$51
LCD
Electricity use
(MJ/functional
unit)
8.55 :
278. .
853
• ;0 : '.'.
- '. - . ' ' - -
1,140
Unit
cost
($/MJ)
0.01 2a
0.01 2a
0.02 1b •
0.01 2a
...
Cost
($US) '
$0.10
$3.4.
$18
$0
$22
H999 U.S. average cost of electricity for the industrial sector is $0.0443/kWh. Assuming 3.6
MJ/kWh, ($0.0443/kWh)/(3.6 MJ/kWh)= $0.012/MJ. Source: www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electric-
ity/esr/tll.txt.                        .
b!999 U.S. average cost of electricity for the residential and commercial sectors is $0.0771/kWh.
Assuming 3.6 MJ/kWh, ($0.0771/kWh)/(3.6 MJ/kWh)= $0.021/MJ.  Source: www.eia.doe.gov/
cneaf/electricity/esr/tl 1 .txt.

                                                                                                             SBฎ


-------



 Question  8:

 Can  the  lead,                    and                   :

 crystals  in  computer

 health  risks?

 In addition to the environmental life-cycle assessment of desktop computer displays, a more
 detailed analysis was conducted for a few select materials of interest to EPA, industry, and others
 who participated in the project. This additional analysis provides more detailed information on
 the potential exposures and chemical risks of these materials to both human and ecological  !
 populations. The materials selected for further analysis were lead, mercury, and liquid crystals.
 Having chosen these three materials a priori does not presume that these are the only materials
 worthy of additional analyses.                                                  :    ,

 LEAD                                                                   '*
 Lead is found in glass components of CRTs and in electronics components (e.g., printed wiring
 boards and their components) of both CRTs and LCDs. It is also a top priority toxic material at
 EPA and the subject of electronics industry efforts to reduce .or eliminate its future use. The
 following section summarizes the conclusions drawn from a focused look at lead's role in the life
 cycle of the computer display, and its affects on human health and the environment.

 CRTs contain over 25 times more lead than LCDs. Lead is a significant material in current
 CRTs, accounting for up to eight percent of the overall composition of the CRT by weight. As
 shown in Table 8.1, lead is used in the CRT glass parts (funnel, panel, and neck glass), the   •
 sealing frit, and the solder on the printed wiring boards within the CRT. Lead is not as prevalent
 in LCDs,'being found only on printed wiring boards.

                Table 8.1. Computer display  parts that contain lead
Part
Funnel
Front panel
Neck
Frit
Printed wiring boards (total)
Printed wiring boards (total)
Display type
CRT
CRT
CRT
CRT
CRT
LCD
Quantity
(kg)a
0.91
0.18 :
0.012
0.026
0.051
0.043
% lead content of part
(by weight) '
22-28% b'c
0-4 >c
26-32 b'c
70-80 b'c-d
NA
. NA
1 Quantity of lead in a 17" monitor (Monchamp et. al., 2001).
bMenad,1999.
c lee ef. al., 2000.
d Busio and Steigelmann, 2000.
NA= Not applicable


-------
"Lead-Wsed impacts were greater in CRTs than in LCDs.  Impacts from lead were found in the
following eight categories: non-renewable resources, hazardous waste landfill use, solid waste
landfill use, radioactivity, chronic public health effects, chronic occupational health effects,
aquatic toxicity, and terrestrial toxicity. Lead-based impacts from the CRT ranged from moder-
ately to significantly greater than those from the LCD in every category, with the exception of
solid waste landfill use.  The most significant difference was in non-renewable resource consump-
tion, resulting primarily from the lead (a non-renewable resource) used in manufacturing the
CRT glass.  In this impact category the CRT (989 grams) used over 40 thousand times more
lead over the course of its life cycle than LCD (0.025 grams). Other categories where CRTs had
notably greater differences in impacts were in hazardous waste landfill use, chronic public health
effects, and terrestrial toxicity.

Even in  CRTs, lead-based impacts are low relative to impacts from other materials. While
the use of lead in a computer display life cycle does contribute to several impact categories, in
relation  to other materials used in computer displays, such as glass and copper wire, lead's
impacts  are relatively low.  For example, the lead impacts for CRTs in the non-renewable re-
sources category account for only 0.2 percent of the overall impact score in the category.

For workers, inhalation is the most likely route of exposure to lead. Many of the processes
 required to manufacture computer displays use lead in the workplace; correspondingly, there is
' the potential for worker exposure. Exposure occurs through inhalation, dermal contact (when
 lead or materials containing lead .come into contact with workers' skin), or through ingestion
 (e.g., ingestion of lead-bearing dust). The greatest potential for high-level occupational exposure ,
 occurs in lead smelting and refining operations, where lead is vaporized during high-temperature
 heating. This heating releases lead fumes and small respirable lead particles.  Existing studies of
 smelting and refining operations have found mean concentrations of lead in the air nearly 90
 times higher than the OSHA recommended safety levels for worker exposure. Exposures to lead
 dust may also occur during lead mining, frit manufacturing, CRT glass manufacturing,  or
 processes in which metallic lead is heated in the presence of air.              •

 Many occupational exposures can be minimized or avoided. The presence of lead in the
 workplace does not mean that occupational exposures are unavoidable. Worker exposures to lead
 can be reduced or even eliminated through the use of personal protective equipment, sound
 operating practices, or advanced machinery that protects workers from exposure (e.g., an en-
 closed and vented wave solder machine). To determine actual worker exposures to  lead, a
 complete exposure assessment specific to each manufacturing process would be required. Addi-
 tionally, alternatives are being developed, such as lead-free solders and glass components, that
 will potentially minimize the future lead content in both CRTs and LCDs.

 MERCURY
 Mercury is contained widiin the fluorescent tubes that provide the source of light in the LCD.
 : Mercury is also emitted from some fuel combustion processes, such as coal-fired power plants,
 ; which contribute to  the life-cycle impacts of both CRTs and LCDs. Because of mercury's
 toxicity to both'humans and the environment, a more detailed analysis of mercury in this study
 :was warranted. The following conclusions were drawn from a focused look at mercury's role in
 the life  cycle of the computer display, and its effects on human health and the environment.


-------
 Life-cycle mercury emissions are similar for CRTs and LCDs.  The mercury emitted from the
 generation of power consumed by the CRT during manufacturing and use (7.75 mg), is slightly
 greater than the entire amount of mercury emissions from the LCD, including both the mercury
 used in LCD backlights (3.99 mg) and the mercury emissions from electricity generation (3.22
 mg). Although this was not expected because mercury is intentionally incorporated into LCDs,
 but not in CRTs, the results are not surprising because mercury emissions from coal-fired power
 plants are known, to be one of die largest anthropogenic sources of mercury in the United States.
                                                                                    !
 Mercury outputs from LCDs had a broader effect on the environment than those from
 CRTs.  The life-cycle mercury-based outputs from LCDs affected six impact categories, while
 those from CRTs showed impacts in three categories, as shown in Table 8.2. LCD impacts to;
 both solid  and hazardous waste landfill use, as well as to the chronic health effects of workers,' all
 result directly from die use of mercury in the LCD backlights. No mercury is required in CRT
 fabrication. Aldiough the quantities of mercury are not large, they cannot be discounted given
 die toxicity of mercury to both human health and the environment.                       I

            Table 8.2. Mercury-based impact categories for CRTs and LCDs        :
Impact category
Hazardous Waste Landfill Use (m3)
Solid Waste Landfill Use (m3)
Chronic Health Effects-Public (tox-kg)
Chronic Health Effects-Occupational (tox-kg)
Aquatic Toxicity (tox-kg)
Terrestrial Toxicity (tox-kg)
Impact calculated
for CRT life-cycle
0
0
5.22E-04
0
9.02E-04
5.21 E-04
Impact calculated
for LCD life-cycle
•7.73E-15
1.98E-11 ;
3. 11 E-04
3.99E-06
5.43E-04
3. 11 E-04
Overall, mercury-based impacts are low relative to impacts from other materials. Contribu-
tions from mercury-based impacts are not significant relative to the total life-cycle impacts from
odier materials (e.g., glass, copper wire), with the greatest contribution of mercury-based outputs
occurring in die aquatic toxicity category (contributing 0.4 percent for CRTs, 0.01 percent for
LCDs).                                                                             !

Worker exposure may occur during backlight fabrication for LCDs. About 4 mg of elemen-
tal mercury is used to manufacture the fluorescent backlight for die LCD. Possible pathways of
worker exposure during backlight fabrication include inhalation of mercury vapors, dermal   '
exposure, or ingestion.  Occupational chronic healdi effect scores from mercury exposures    I
(3.99e-06 tox-kg for LCD, none for CRT) likely underestimate the chronic occupational impacts
for mercury, because they are based on inputs only and do not consider chronic occupational !
impacts from outputs in other processes, such as aluminum production or fluorescent lamp   I
recycling, which may result in emissions of mercury that originate widiin the workplace.

The most likely pathway for general population exposure to mercury is inhalation. Per
functional unit, LCDs are responsible for approximately 4 mg of mercury releases to the air and
CRTs are responsible for approximately 12 mg. Mercury is naturally present in coal and becomes

-------
airborne when coal is burned to generate electricity for the manufacturing and use of the com-
puter displays. Airborne mercury can stay in the atmosphere for up to a year and can travel
thousands of miles, potentially resulting in general population exposures.

Alternative backlights could reduce the mercury impacts of LCDs. Alternative backlights
have been developed that not only eliminate mercury from the light, but also improve many of
the optical characteristics of the displays.  Current development is focused on improving the
energy efficiency of the alternative lights.

LIQUID CRYSTALS
Liquid crystals'are organic compounds responsible for generating an image for the LCD. The
toxicity of the liquid crystals in LCDs has been alluded to in the literature, yet there is very little
known about the toxicity of these materials. The following conclusions were drawn from a
focused look at the role of liquid crystals in the life cycle of the computer display, and its effects
on human health and the environment.

Liquid crystals are not used in CRTs.  Liquid crystals are not used to fabricate CRTs and so
have no environmental impacts in the CRT life cycle.

Toxicological data on liquid crystals are limited. There are several hundred liquid crystal
substances that may be used in an LCD; therefore, comprehensive toxicological data are not
available. However, limited tests that have been conducted by manufacturers indicate that few
liquid crystals have acute toxic potential to humans.  The study also reviewed toxicological data
from eight liquid crystal compounds identified as part of the life-cycle inventory. The review
failed to identify toxicological thresholds, indicating that the testing of these chemicals is prob-
 ably insufficient to determine their potential for chronic human effects.

 Liquid crystals do not appear to contribute significantly to any of the impact categories for
 LCDs.  When no toxicity data were available, the study used a default average toxicity value.
 This practice prevents the study from assuming there are no toxic impacts just because there are
 no data.  Of the 20 impact categories designed for this study, liquid crystals contribute only to
 the category of "chronic occupational health effects." Relative to other materials used in LCDs,
 however, the  impact of liquid crystals on this impact category is very small.  Specifically, the
 impacts from liquid crystals  on overall chronic occupational health effects represent less than
 0.01 percent of the total impact for the functional unit  of one LCD.  Impacts were not calcu-
 lated for liquid crystal releases because data regarding liquid crystal outputs were not available to
 the project.

-------
                                                                       .Taanaaanil
  Question  9:                        —

  What  can  computer                             .      ; •

  manufacturers do  to

  environmental

  The final step of an LCA is an "improvement assessment" or "interpretation of results." An
  improvement assessment is the systematic evaluation of opportunities for reducing the environ-
  mental impacts of a product, process, or activity. In this LCA, the improvement assessment is
  left to individual computer display manufacturers.                                   !  -.

  The improvement assessment can be done at various levels of effort, beginning with looking :at
  the overall results  as presented in the CDP report by life-cycle stage, or looking at individual
  material contributions to impacts. Using the LCIA data reported in the CDP, one would first
  apply individual subjective importance weights to each impact category to help determine where
  to focus improvements.  This can be done at the life-cycle stage level, the process or process '
•  group level, or individual material level.  All the data presented in the CDP report should allpw
  for this type of assessment, with the exception of the subjective importance weights. The   ;
  importance weights simply mean looking at which impact categories have greater importance to
  the decision-maker and weighing those impacts accordingly. This will assist in making decisions
  about where the greatest impacts of particular interest to a company are and where one would
  choose to target improvements.

 If more analyses are desired about a certain process, a company may perform the analysis inter-
 nally with additional data they have collected or they may contact the University of Tennessee to
 determine if additional analyses can be done and still protect confidentiality of data. Additional
 analyses by the University of Tennessee beyond those presented in the final report would be done
 for a fee as negotiated with the University of Tennessee.                               :

 The LCA results do identify several areas manufacturers should consider as part of their improve-
 ment assessment. Regardless of whether a manufacturer is conducting a complete improvement
 assessment, the LCA methodology itself provides a systematic process for considering the envi-
 ronmental and health impacts of the computer display's life. Specifically, manufacturers should
 consider the following when conducting an improvement assessment or evaluating potential
 process improvements:

 Of the various life-cycle stages, the actual manufacturing process presents the most oppor-
 tunities for improvement. Opportunities for improvement in CRT manufacture could include
 improved energy efficiency during glass manufacturing and reductions in lead content.  Oppdr-
 tunities for improvement in manufacturing LCDs could also include improved energy efficiency.
 Certain materials, such as sulfur hexaflouride, are of concern due to their contribution to global
warming, and should be an area of focus in an improvement assessment.

-------
Consider the impacts of manufacturing changes on other stages of the product's life cycle.
Computer display manufacturers will likely have the most control over the manufacturing life-
ycle stage, but they should also recognize the influences on the other stages on total environ-
mental impacts. Any improvement assessment should consider how changes in one life-cycle
stage will affect impacts in other stages. For example, the mercury inputs and outputs from the
intentional use of mercury in an LCD backlight are less (by mass) than the mercury emissions
from the CRT use stage, due to the relative energy inefficiency of the CRT and the emissions of
mercury from electricity generation. This example illustrates that on a pure mass basis, a
product's energy efficiency is a key consideration, and any changes in manufacturing should be
examined to determine whether they will increase energy use.  In general, life-cycle trade-offs
must be considered in any improvement assessment.

Identify opportunities by evaluating the relative environmental impacts of different process
steps and components. The LCA provides an accounting of the relative, potential environmen-
tal and health impacts of various components of the computer displays.  This information can
help computer display manufacturers identify opportunities for product improvements to reduce
potential adverse environmental impacts and costs. Identification of impacts from the computer
display technologies can also help manufacturers determine where their best opportunities lie for
implementing pollution prevention options. .

Manufacturers can use this study as a basis to evaluate company-specific processes. One of
the objectives of this study was to. provide a model for future analyses. Companies that have-
more current data for the CRT or  LCD can apply them to the study's model. For example,
changes in an individual process can be identified and incorporated into the results. The other
processes that are not expected to change significandy can be left unchanged, and only limited
data would need to be altered.  This method would reduce the time and resources that would
normally be required for a complete analysis.  Companies may examine their processes internally
or contact the University of Tennessee to discuss opportunities to conduct additional analyses.

Manufacturers can weigh criteria to reflect site-specific factors. Those interested in compar-
ing the results of the two computer display technologies can apply their own set of importance
weights to each impact category to make their site-specific decision.  For example, if energy
impacts are considered to be much more important than aesthetics, energy can be weighed more
heavily in concluding which monitor may have fewer environmental impacts.  When applying
the study results, it is also important to keep in mind the data limitations and uncertainties, as
well as cost and performance considerations.
                                                                                                     ira^

-------

36

                            Question   10:

                            Where  can  I  find

                            about  the computer

                            DOCUMENTS                                                            i
                            In addition to the LCA report and this summary booklet, the Design for the Environment (DfE)l
                            program has supported the development of several documents specifically for the computer
                            display industry. These documents can be downloaded from the DfE website at www.epa.gov/
                            dfe, or hardcopies may be ordered through the Pollution Prevention Information Clearinghouse
                            (PPIC), at the address below. Additional copies of this booklet and a limited number of copies
                            of the overall Life-Cycle Assessment report can also be obtained through the DfE website or
                            through PPIC.                                                               !

                            Pollution Prevention Information Clearinghouse (PPIC)
                            U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (Mailcode 7407)
                            1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW                                                   •
                            Washington, DC 20460                                                       :
                            Phone: (202) 260-1023              '                              '      "     '.
                            Fax: (202) 260-4659                                                          !
                            E-mail: ppic@epa.gpv             .                                            ;
                            web site: www.epa.gov/opptinti71ibrary/libppic.htm
                                                                                                      I
                            Document titles available and their EPA document numbers are as follows:

                            Computer Display Project Fact Sheet (EPA/744-F98-010)                          ;
                           August 1998; 2 pages                                                          >
                           This fact sheet provides basic information about the Computer Display Project. It explains the
                           EPA partnership with the industry, examines the nature and goals of the project, and provides an
                           overview of work conducted by the project team, including the Life-Cycle Assessment/Cleaner
                           Technologies Substitutes Assessment study.                                        !

                           Computer Display Industry and Technology Profile (EPA/744-R-98-005)
                           December 1998; 67pages         .    '     "    '                                 ]
                           This report contains an overview of the cathode ray tube (CRT) and liquid crystal display (LCD)
                           computer monitor markets, and explains the basic operation and manufacturing of CRTs and
                           thin-film transistor LCDs.                                                     <

                           Desktop Computer Displays: A Life-Cycle Assessment (EPA/744-RO1 -004a and b)      ;
                           December2001; LCA:383pages (EPAl74A-'Rฃ>l-OQ4z)+Appendices: 566pages           ' \
                           (EPA/744-R01-004b)                                                          ;
                           This report presents the results of the Life-Cycle Assessment developed for DfE's Computer !
                           Display Project.  The study assessed the life-cycle environmental impacts of two technologies
                           that can be used for desktop computer displays: the traditional cathode ray tube (CRT) technol-
                           ogy, and the newer liquid crystal display (LCD) technology. The LCA examined the full life I
                           cycle of the computer displays from materials acquisition to manufacturing, use, and end-of-life.

-------
  RELEVANT TRADE ASSOCIATIONS AND  RESEARCH INSTITUTIONS
 Jniversity of Tennessee Center for Clean Products and Clean Technologies
 $ 11 Conference Center Building
[Cnoxville, TN 37996-4134     -    -   '     .   -
 Phone: (865) 974-8979
 Pax: (865) 974-1838
 ^erc. ra. utk. edu/clean
    Center for Clean Products and Clean Technologies is located at the University of Tennessee,
  loxville. The Center's mission is to develop, evaluate, and promote cleaner products and
 cleaner technologies that minimize pollution at the source and contribute to long-term sustain-
 ale development.

 ilectronics Industries Alliance   '             -   .
 Z500 Wilson Boulevard                                  .
 rlington,VA 22201                                                •
1(703)907-7966
    r. eia.org       ,
 The Electronic Industries Alliance (EIA) is an alliance of electronic and high tech associations
 committed to shared knowledge and shared influence.  EIA's mission is to promote the competi-
 tiveness and market development of the U.S. high tech industry, through domestic and interna-
 tional policy efforts.                                 '

 U.S. Display Consortium
 60 S. Market Street, Suite 480
 San Jose, CA 95113
 Phone:(408)277-2400
 Fax: (408) 277-2490
www.usdc.org
The United States Display Consortium (USDC)  is an industry-led  public/private partnership
providing a forum for flat panel manufacturers, developers, users, and equipment materials
suppliers.                                                               :

Asian Technology Information Program
P.O. Box 9678
Albuquerque, NM 87119-9678
Phone:(505)842-9020
Fax:(505)766-5166                                .    -
www.atip.or.jp                                        :
Asian Technology Information Program's objective is to help bridge the technology information
gap by promoting collaborations and other profitable interactions between "Western and Japan/
Asian organizations. This organization assisted the DfE.CDP project by collecting life-cycle
inventory data from computer display manufacturers in Japan and Korea.
                                                                                                               3 1;

-------

-------

-------

-------

-------

-------