&EPA
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Office of Pollution
Prevention and Toxics
7408
November 1994
EPA 745-K-94-018
EPA's 33/50 Program
Company Profile
Eastman Kodak Company
Printed on Recycled Paper
-------
-------
EPA's 33/50 PROGRAM
COMPANY PROFILES .
This Company Profile is pan of a series of reports
being developed by EPA to highlight'the accom-.
plishments of companies participating in the 33/50
Program. The 33/50 Program is an EPA voluntary
pollution reduction initiative that promotes reduc-
tions in direct environmental releases and offsite
transfers of 17 high-priority toxic chemicals. The,
program derives its name from its overall goals
an interim goal of a 33% reduction by 1992 and
an ultimate goal of-a 50% reduction by 1995. The
program uses 1988 Toxics Release Inventory (TRI)
reporting as a baseline. In February, 1991, EPA
began contacting the parent companies pf TRI
. facilities that reported using 33/50 Program
chemicals since 1988 to request their participation
in the 33/50 Program. As of November, 1995,
nearly 1,300 companies had elected to participate
in the Program, pledging to reduce emissions of
the 17 target chemicals by more than 380 million
pounds by 1995. Companies set their own reduc-
tion targets, which may vary from the Program's
national 33% and 50% reduction goals.
t A&&ETEB
BYTHE33/50PROGRAM/
BENZENE r
CHLOROFORM
CHROMIUM &, COMPOUNDS -
MCKLOROMETHAMB*
JJ3A»&
MERCUKY
' MEIBXL. E
, METHYL ISpBOTYL'KEfQNE
T0L!2EHE ..
* Aiso reMred to as rnethylene chloride
Industry exceeded the 33/50 Program's interim 33%
reduction goal by more than 100 million pounds in
1992. National emissions of Program chemicals
were reduced by an additional 100 million pounds
in 1993, bringing total reductions since 1988 to
more than 685 million pounds (46%). Facilities' TRI projections suggest that the'Program's ultimate 50%
reduction goal will be observed to have been achieved or exceeded in the 1994 TRI data, a full year ahead
of^chedule. The 1,300 companies enrolled in the 33/50 Program have accounted for most of the Progra-
m's pollution reductions. Representing just 15%ofeligible companies and owning'only a third of the facil-
ities reporting Program chemicals to TRI, participants are responsible for 78% of the reductions since '_
1988 and 98% of the 100 million pounds reduced in 1993. , _.. .
EPA is committed to recognizing companies for their participation in the 33/50 Program and for the
emissions reductions they achieve. The Program issues periodic Progress Reports, in which participat-
ing companies are listed and highlighted. In addition, Company Profiles, such as this one, are being
prepared to provide more detailed information about how companies have achieved their emissions
reductions. Information presented in these profiles is drawn from a number of sources, including the-
conipany's written communications to the 33/50 Program, extensive interviews with company representa-
tives, the annual TRI reports submitted by the company's facilities (including Pollution Prevention Act
data reported to TRI in Section 8 of Form R), and, in many cases, site visits to one or more of the com-
pany's facilities. Mention of trade names, products, or services in this document does not convey, and
should not be interpreted to convey, official EPA approval, endorsement, or recommendation.
Copies of other 33/50 Program Company Profiles, as well as Reductions Highlights documents
summarizing all of these Profiles, maybe obtained by contacting the Program as specified in the box
below. In addition, all written company communications to EPA regarding the 33/50 Program are avail-
able to the public upon request.
' - For mjbrmatten-OK tlm 33/58 J?r&grtm, intact tke TSCA £feiKw #t{2&2} 554~Mf)4 dr&onta^i 33/59
Program* stt$ directly by phone at f202) 26Q-&9Q7 or by mall at Maz| Code 740$, Office of Pollution
, ,',,,. .,
33/50 PROGRAM COMPANY PROFILE: EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY
-------
1(1 111 III I I I I 11I
iiini n i ill n
in i i
"illiiii ii1 11'. in i
i in
!!!,!
i Hi in
I lllll Jill >
I 1 II
111111 II
-------
Eastman Kodak Company
Eastman Kodak Company reduced releases
and transfers of 33/50 Program Chemicals by 54%
or 8 million pounds between 1988 and 1992. The
installation of a dichloromethane recovery system
and implementation of process changes at the
Kodak Park facility in Rochester, NY accounted
for 4.7 million pounds of this amount.
I. CORPORATE BACKGROUND
Eastman Kodak Company, headquartered in
Rochester, NY, is the world's largest manufacturer
of photographic products and supplies. The
company's products include imaging equipment
and supplies (37% of sales), information systems
(20%), synthetic textile fibers, plastics and chemi-
cals (18%), and health and phahnaceuticals (25%).
U. S. based operations accounted for 55% of the
company's revenues. On December 31, 1993,
Eastman Chemical Company, a subsidiary of
Eastman Kodak, was formed as a separate compa-
ny.
The company has been known for its tradition-
al film business, not only for amateur and profes-
sional photographers, but also for the motion
picture industry, aerospace, and scientific research.
Recently it has been moving into various forms of
electronic data and imaging systems. Eastman
Kodak has 13 facilities in,the United States that
report use of most chemicals in the 33/50 Program.
Eastman Kodak Company reduced re-
leases and transfers of 33/50 Program
Chemicals by 54% (8 million pounds)
between 1988 and 1992.
Releases of TRI Chemicals Reported by
Eastman Kodak Company
(1,000 Ibs)
1988 1992
'33/50 Program Chemicals
Benzene
Cadmium Compounds
Carbon Tetrachioride
Chloroform
Chromium Compounds
Cyanides
. Dichloromethane
Lead & Compounds
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
* Methyl Isobutyl Ketone
Nickel Compounds
Tetrachloroethylene
Toluene
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
Trlchloroethylene
Xylenes
33/50 Subtotal*
Other TRI Chemicals
Total* <
" 84
. 1
<1
. 36
63
-------
(Illllll I III III
mil
Illllll
actively working to control and reduce multi-media
releases and transfers worldwide,
111
Prior to setting its 33/50 Program goals,
Eastman Kodak had developed the following
explicit schedules for reduction and elimination of
use and release of ozone depleting chemicals:
y, Elimination of 1,1,1-trichloroethane by 1998,
with an interim goal of a 50% reduction" m'
I releases and transfers by 1995. Kodak has
since advanced this goal to 'elimination""by
1995. M/ , ' ,
Elimination of CFCs covered by the 1987
Montreal Protocol from use in direct manu-
facturing (i.e., not refrigeration) by 1995. The
company set an interim goal of a 50% reduc-
tion by 1993.
II11 I '111)
in, 33/50 PROGRAM GOALS
In May of 1991, Eastman Kodak set a corpo-
rate goal to reduce total releases and transfers of
33/5Q Program chemicals by 55% by 1995 from the
1988 TRI baseline. Kodak's decision to participate
in the 33/50 Program was made by the company's
^a-gjg^g^ j'O^jj^jj onTEnvironmentai Responsi-
bility, which provides direction and review of
health, safety, and environmental policies and
practices for the company worldwide.
The company's goal translates to a pledged
reduction of over 8.2 million pounds. The compa-
ny stated that it planned to achieve this reduction
through the following priority sequence: source
reduction, solvent recovery, other methods of
recycling or re-use treatment, and disposal.
1,1,1-TrichIoroethane is an ozone depleting
chemical that is also included in the 33/50 Pro-
gram's list of 17 targeted chemicals. CFCs
(chlorpfluorocarbons) are not a 33/50 Program
targeted chemical, and companies were not re-
quired to"report releases and transfers of CFCs to"
TRI in 1988, the base year of the 33/50 Program.
Eastman Kodak has developed a set of
nine broad principles representing its
vision of environmental commitment
and responsibility.
The company also measures its pollution pre-
vention progress and reports annually on its
environmental record to shareholders and the
general public In a^gjt{on) the company is com-
mitted to recognizing and responding to communi-
ty concerns about its operations.
Eastman Kodak also places emphasis on
shared ^p0-n"gHjj|jjy Of companies, industries, and
government in safeguarding the workplace and the
environment. To this end, the company subscribes
lo the Chemical Manufacturers Association's
"Responsible Care" Pollution Prevention Code.
The company also participates in many governmen-
III,"Industry, and trade groups dealing with envj_
ronmental issues.
,,,,,,
The company developed these goals in con-
junction with permitting requirements for air
emissions of toxic chemicals at its facilities, as well
as its goals for ozone depleting chemicals devel-
oped in conjunction with the Montreal Protocol.
IV. RECOVERY OF DICHLOROMETHANE
AT THE KODAK PARK FACILITY
Kodak Park is a large manufacturing facility
adjacent to corporate headquarters in Rochester,
NY. Among its operations is film base manufac-
turing which uses large quantities of dichioro-
methane. The facility uses dichioromethane as the
principal solvent in manufacturing cellulose
triacetateTbased films, for modern cameras. In
1988, 95% of the dichioromethane used at the
facility was reused or recycled and only 5% was
released or transferred off-site. However, this 5%
constituted 9.0 million of the 24.6 million pounds
(37%) of total TRI releases and transfers for the
facility in 1988. Over 97% of the total release of
dichlpromethane from this operation are air emis-
sions. ' ~ ' '
Dichioromethane has been the solvent of
choice in film manufacturing since 1944, when it
was substituted for acetone, which is more flamma-
ble.. To produce the film base, cellulose triacetate
is dissolved in a solvent mixture containing mostly
dichioromethane, resulting in a solution with the
consistency roughly of honey. The solution, known
as "dope" is filtered and then thinly coated onto
large highly-polished casting wheels in equipment
that is 60 feet long and more than 3 stories high
3f3/50 Program Profile: Eastman Kodak Company
i
11 in i
-------
(see diagram). The solvents,gradually evaporate,
leaving the film base behind. Finally, after curing
and hardening steps, this clear film is coated with
light-sensitive chemicals to give it photographic
properties.
In the late 1980s Eastman_Kodak initiated a
program to reduce the air emissions of
dichloromethane from its Kodak Park facility.
This was part of a program to expand its film base
manufacturing. First, the company explored
substitutes for this solvent in its film making
operations. Various solvents have been studied
but, thus far, none has been found to be suitable,
mostly because of inadequate solvent capability for
the cellulose triacetate, increased flammability and
toxicity, and increased potential for environmental
impact.
The next option explored was modifying or
substituting cellulose triacetate with other materi-
als to make the base of the film, in the hope of
finding one that would allow the use of other
solvents. To date, the company has been unable to
identify a satisfactory substitute material with the
desired mechanical properties of cellulose
triacetate. Modern cameras are built around the
properties of the film as currently used; film with"
different mechanical properties can damage deli-
cate camera- parts or, alternatively, may not be
sturdy enough for rigorous use.
While the company continues to search for
more environmentally, desirable alternatives to
dichloromethane at Kodak Park, it has taken an
interim ' step to increase recovery of
dichloromethane from the current film base pro-
cesses. .' " .
Acetate Film Base Manufacturing Machine!
(A) Dope Hopper
(B) Revolving Wheel
(Q Air Sections
(D) Subhoppers
(E) Windup Area
33/50 Program Profile: Eastman Kodak Company
-------
/nlllliiiiirlii;i>;ivi,i i fi'iiiii"1
.' . ;»u. L/wifrnJiif'iiNi iiii 11 iiiiii i mi ill mi in i i it ill nil i i i i
In 1988 aiyf 1989 the Company negotiated a
fmlf from the New York State Department of
wonmental ..... Conservation to a||pw^Kcpansipn of | '
"'' '" ' KcTdak" - ....... *-""
INI I III j I II III
often and more ngorously. It also replaces defec-
tive equipment parts as early as possible.
i in
mt included a requirement that Kodak imple-
ment measures developed previously to reduce
js ...... ifE i!i i dichloromethane air releases by 30% before expan-
sion took place, and reduce fugitive air emissions
::::;:; by 50% by June 1996. With substitutions deemed
;::;:;;;;;,:;,, ;;;;;; Jgfeasible ....... at ^jie ........ time ...... Of permitting, the 'company
i: -'::::;;'dfici(|eA .......... to ...... ijnplement a program" to reduce
dfchiorornethane emissions through several equip-
ment and process modifications, described below.
'Mi'":!:!!!1*'flNIS,!!''!:!!!, ,;:!,
The 33/50 Program has accelerated the
'fate of reductions by providing a frame-
These measures gave leaH"to a 'steady decline-
in releases and transfers of dichloromethane from
9.0 million pounds in 1988 to 4.4 million pounds
in 1992, a decrease of more than 50%. The com-
pany anticipates that by 1996 it will be able to
undertake source reduction activities in the form
of product design changes and raw materials
substitutions to achieve more than a 70% reduc-
' tion in dichloromethane releases and transfers, and
also reach a 99% reuse/recycle efficiency of the
chemical.
IV. PROGRESS TOWARDS 33/50
REDUCTION GOALS
Eastman Kodak to implement
'. ''prfwen&on program fa"coh.
a common^ recognized nation-
g| goal and timetable.
The company identified two sources of air
emissions to target for reduction: point source air
rfeleages torn a solvent recovery process resulting
fjconi inefficiencies in extracting vapor from the
''Citing air stream) and fugitive air emissions
'^llnbutable to leaks in equipment, handling or
storage.
Eastman Kodak has reduced company-wide
releases and transfers of 33/50 chemicals by 54%
from 1988 to 1992, through elimination of over 8
million pounds of releases and transfers. Over the
same time period, the Company reduced total
releases and transfers of all TRI chemicals by 34.8
million pounds, a reduction of 38%. Of this
amount, the dichloromethane process changes
described above at the Kodak Park facility account-
ed for 4.7 million pounds, or 13% of the reduction.
To reduce both types of air releases, the
company" installed a closed loop recovery system to
capture and reclaim solvent vapors for reuse. The
solvent recovery system involves collecting solvents
evaporating '"from the ""film base rroln''enclosures
around the processing machinery, along with
machine air. The system cools the vapor/air
mixture to approximately -85°F and condenses the
vapor out of the air. The air is returned to the
machinery enclosures. The liquids are pumped to
a distillation area for exfraction of the individual
solvent components, which are returned for use in
formulation. As a resul^of this addition of on-site
recycling, the company now recaptures 98.9% of
the dichloromethane used in film base manufac-
turing.
Distribution of Reductions
of 33/50 Chemicals
Dichloromethane
Recovery at
Kodak Park
58%
Other Projects
23%
MIBK Recovery
at Tennessee Eastman
19%
To further reduce fugitive air emissions, the
Implemented an aggressive monitoring
^,,,--, _,__ ...... _ ~" '
ny performs leak and equipment inspections more
; Similar solvent recovery techniques have been
employed at the company's Kingsport, Tennessee
facility (an Eastman Chemical plant) to reduce
releases and transfers of methyl isobutyl ketone
(MIBK) by over 1,500,000 pounds.
Er ji: TiliJ LIKE,,
iiii;1, LSI'!,ii'i" ;, :»'ii>!'i "»' ill!1': 'i
I.'!,: ;!:'; iiir i1:::, :»E 'il A, r::1: " iw;AiBsa >
I '
i ,1 iinriCi: I"'1:!!!1 IKiilliiLilill i« ;<«I'll J IHilli:,,:-' IM '!!:.:', '..; ? iul! 'Ill: I1, "!<,'!,::" A ^,I
'4 1- X:
'rogram Profile: Eastman Kodak Company
:" " ' -' ^ :l: =|:'=": =:" "'7 "::"::"""*?-!"' ""::'':~~,\r "' ":''''
-------
While the company expects to expand its US
manufacturing operations over the next few years,
it anticipates exceeding its 55% 33/50 Program
goal by the end of 1995.
In addition, as shown in Table III, company-
wide waste generation of 33/50 Program chemicals
declined from 1991 to 1992 by more than 11.1
million pounds (27%). Moreover, in 1992, the
company projected an additional 1 million pound
drop by 1994, an objective company representatives
say Kodak has achieved. A drop in waste genera-
tion occurring at the same time as anticipated
increases in production suggests that the on-site
recycling solvent recovery processes will become
more efficient and that the implementation of
source reduction activities may take place prior to
1994. - . ' ,. .
V. SUMMARY OF KODAK'S
EXPERIENCE
The Eastman Kodak Company has significantly
reduced its releases and transfers of TRI chemicals,
especially of those covered by the 33/50 Program.
The company has established a 55% release and
transfer reduction goal for 1995 and expects to
exceed it. Much of this reduction already has been
achieved, primarily through improved solvent
recovery systems, although the company has plans
to implement various source reduction techniques
to reach its final goal.
Although part of the company's 33/50 Program
goals were created from company projections and
permit requirements already in place at the time of
the program's inception, Eastman Kodak's experi-
ence with the 33/50 Program has been a positive
one.
Eastman Kodak's Progress Towards
Meeting 33/50 Goals .
16000
14000
« 12000
£.
s. 10000
re
M
O)
in
re
._aj
0)
te
"re
_o
0)
O
o
in
8000
6000
4000
2000
0
33/50
' Goal
1988 1989 1990 1991 1992
The 33/50 Program has accelerated the rate of
reductions by providing a framework for Eastman
Kodak to implement its pollution prevention
program in concert with a common, recognized
national goal and timetable. The 33/50 Program
also fits well with Eastman Kodak's principle of
shared responsibility in environmental issues by
allowing industry and government to work together
to create voluntary reductions, rather than relying
on mandated solutions.
33/50 Program Profile: Eastman Kodak Company
-------
Table!
Eastman Kodak Company
"Releases and Transfers of TRI Chemicals, 1988-1992
, Chemical
Dichloromethane
Other 33/50 Chemicals
total 33/50 Program Chemicals
Non 33/50 .Program Chemicals
- -
<
All TRI Chemicals
. '
''- ' ' »
Percent Change. 1988-1992
33/50 Program Chemicals
- Non 33/50 Program chemicals
All TRI Chemicals
Year
1988
1989,
1990
1991
1992 .
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1988 .
1989
1990
1991
1992
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
Total Air
Emissions
(pounds)""
8,976,062
7,060,965
5,766,137 .
4,726,702
.4,404,803
5,318,183
3,187,835
2,659,918
2,332,340
2,152,444
14,294,245
10,248,800
8,426,055,
7,059,042
6,557,247
71,059,193
68,963,802
.. 60,130,479
57,969,542
. 46,823,108
85,353,438
79,212,602
68,556,534
65,028,584
53,380,355
-54%
-34%
-37.%
Surface
Water
Discharges
(pounds)
21,058
8,110
4,106.
. 6,402
7,667
44,246
15,836
10,906
, 24,686
20,218
65,304
23,946
15,012
31,088
27,885
2,115,018
3,649,1309
3,098,574
1,187,805
1,180,781
2,180,322
3,672,955
3,113,586
1,218,893
1,208,666
*
-57% '
-44%
-45%
Releases
to Land
(pounds)
120,000
, 1,500
9,200
"' -°
:55
60,332 1
70,512
182,186
46,005
. 45,38.8
180,332
72,012
191,386
46,005
45,443
166,930
208,644 '
329,733
118,886
206,937
347,262
280,656
521,119
164,891
252,380
' -75%
24%
-27%
Transfers
Off-site
Transfers for Treatment/
to POTW Disposal/Other
~ (pounds) (pounds)
; 6
20
~3
6 ;
760.
77,332
9,225
3,394
,9,828
.4,468
77,338
9,245
"3,397
9,828
5,228 .
1,532,411
1,030,306
821,790
986,035
817,330
1,609,749
1,039,551
825,187
995,863 "
822,558
-----
-93%
-47%
'^9%
54,486
115,920, .
16,671
40,321
109,377 -
"303,806
519,994
289,690
, 54,109
192,310 .
358,292
635,914
306,361
94,430
301,687
_ '2,147,813
2,561,588
1,805,612
925,142
1,190,803
2,506,105
3,197,502
.2,111,973
1,019,572
1,492,490
-16%
.. -45%
-40%
Percent
Change
Total Releases 1988-1992
and Transfers Total Releases
(pounds) (1) and Transfers
9,171,612
7,186,515
- .5,796,117 .
4,773,425
4,522,662 ,-51%
5,803,899 ""
3,803,402
3,146,094
2,466,968 '.
.2,414,828 -58%"
14,975,511
10,989,917
8,942,211
. 7,240,393
6,937,490 -54%
77,021,365
76,413,349
66,186,188
61,187,410
- 50,218,959 -35%
91,996,876
87,403,266
75,128,399
68,427,803
57,156,449 ' , : -38%.
- . - : . .
-54% "
. . -35%
-38%
(1) Total Releases and Transfers for 1991 and 1992 do not include on- or off-site recycling or energy recovery.
-------
'! j" ' ' ' ' ''- ' ' .'
" ! " ; "": ' "' """"" im : i :: '
":
1 ' ill iillllll ! T't'l'sa1!*1" 'Wi'll!1!!""!:: iiS ! "I , ' i " ' ' ' 1 IIBf 1'"!': ' f\t\ '1 , ' V ' »!L'li> '!" KAt' ' '' J'lSaiimBl ' '
' ' '"'1' " "' ' ! " ' '" ' '' ' ' '""'' '' ''"'' ' ' ' " '" ' ' " ' " jj ' "' '
,:!' ,.j " "" ^ ,;
iSi Si
SK ss^f^r:s?£:^BS!s:.l.;ll3^
'" :, ,
I ' .
ll. ,. , I l
1 n, . .. . ! , ., ,, :,
::::? ' -: : -tSficrafcd"
: ^'"~ KODAK PARK - ROCHESTER
l iiillllllll!liillllllllli!Li|.'il" ,li Til1! MB'1 illllllF " : ' T IIIIIII" ! ' h illlllllPil'lili!!' T LID!,!* ,i IBiM Km ' '1 riBlCIIPP1 : "
i,'iiiiiiiiliii!iiiini|. 1 1 ,ii PP'PiiiPPiP'iiniiiiiiJiPiitip iP'typp"!' .,'lil'ii:|iiil|i'lli|i|llil;l!|,> . '
ff^'; » "»" ' """"' ; 1- ' -"- ;"; -:~»'::
Other 33/50 Program Chemicals
, iliillllililii", :h" 'i'p.p'iiipi 1 L ;i, in inih iiiiiii'i, : '» .' .pup ' 'if ' ."iiiiiiii"! ill1 " 'Hi1; i >'!iiii " iliiiii ' :. H!' ' lii'iipiii iiiiM h ' '.
'I'"" - = ": ':' ""'!:" " ". :""":'""!"'" "'"" ' "'::'
i" IlilllllBii i, F .; ,!l!::i"ii:!, H' KM Hi1 ! t'1 '" ' "H : ,n ailWIililiili; , , 'J . , "' ": liu'1'"1 >, !! I!!.; 1 T1 J'LlljliHIIIEI!:!!1!.!.
HI 1
,,
=1= ' Total 33/50 Program Chemicals
"jiiiwijiiiiiiii'ii" fipppiiiiiit'''.''*!!!*!'''!!*'!!! " t ppii'i1 , ippppinjiiPii. !!:!nn»i .PS 'iiiiieivUid,'! i:''>i. >.in PPPPPPPPPPI
|i
1
1 Non 33/50 Progratn Chemicals
i
i|iiiilii i n iin ii in in inn inn ni in n ii i n n
ii ii i PI in nun iiiiiii ni n
All TRI Chemicals
i
ill '|H 1 iPlI P ( 'llllll
1 '' ,!!
'^ '! |lfl1'" ^ipp> *'
lilllillM^
v" ;.::
mS-°: i:,!;: '.tr*
Mi!1!!!!!!!' I1'!! .I..".!!!! 'I'1!!1'
' p ! "
Year
Jiv
iniiii^ .'!"W;
1988
IJSJJ^I.' 1990
;,;, ;,:=, 1992
1988
; i OQQ
iiliilllil i i,.i<22, .
" " '":'. 1^98
ISISIIJI''.'!'!..!11! 'I,, A^rtf,^-, ,
1 QQrt
1988
: 1990
1991
1992
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
n 1 1 1 i i
19*88
1989
1990
1991
' 1992
1
ill ll
' III
" , .
-:;,:-. ,!,;:«-<: /.. , :,,v;/M
"""""" :":"":"""' ".."; ' "'
r ..!« /" t !!' ;;... r. ' Eastman Kodak C
"!'!', Releases and Transfer
* ». «;,:.*..- -, '.: ...»
/ :' Surface
iptai AIT waier
'' " TV tf
Emissions Discharges
(pounds) (pounds)
|!|» lii'"'!!'*!!',!1 ."ilS'SiH, i,i"'"r|iiii L '"Hi1."!:, :,,i nil '. »: ',:: I'll1;: i IP
fT8,900,OOpT r 21,000
"'''' '7^6^8,"b&tf ""' " '"'"'"t'loo
5,730,000 4,100
4,670,000 6,400
4,380,000 7,600
133,531 13,056
1,102,317 13,564
g72)94S g)767
692,867 15,643
536,736 17,148
10,233,531 34,056
8,122,317 21,664-
6,502,945 12,867
5,362,867 22,043
4,916,736 24,748
13,480,263 579,299
11,146,442 396,130
9,279,148 322,828
8,363,035 610,960
8,148,227 715,034
II 1 1 1 1
"23,713,794 613,355
19,268,759 417,794
15,682,093 335,695
13,725,902 633,003
13,064,963 739,782
i
l
1
, ll '
1 III 1 1 1 l| III! 1 II ll 1
Table H
Company, Selected Facilities
rs of TRI Chemicals, 1988-1992
L h
Releases'
to Land
(pounds)
120,000'
1,500
9,200
- ' ' '-o
55
6,170
4,199
0
1,533
126,170
5,699
9,261
0
1,588
38,940
. 2,773
3,343
396
0
j
165,110
8,472
12,604
3£6'
1,588
1
> Transfers
Off-site
Transfers for Treatment/
to POTW Disposal/Other
(pounds) (pounds)
«' ' ; . i ; 1 " r
III 1
1 , "
0 3,413
0 ' 69,251
0 " 2,050
6 221
6 ' 372
2,600 9,915
431 ' . 139,226
238 ' 5,951
,135 1,481
56 l 6,967
2,600 13,328
431 208,477
238 8,00l'
135 ' 1,702
56 7,339
1,203 42,520
4,514 629;497
2,093 ' 5,192
3,138 " 9,296
2,886 ' 4,846
3,803 55,848
4,945 837,974
2,331 " ' 13,193
3,273 10,998
2,942 12,185
,
° ' h
, in n i 1 '
1 n h "t
1
I i ii in H illl| iiiiiiii ii
i
i n n i r
Total Releases
and Transfers
(pounds) (1)
1 !" "j"1!" '"
9,044,413
7,098,851
5,745,350
4,676,621
4,388,027
'i
1,365,272
1,259,737
687,962
710,126
562,440
' 10,409,685
8,358,588
6,433,312 ' II""=''":'
5,386,747
4,950,467
i m i
14,142,225
12,179,356 .
9,612,604 ' ". *
8,986,825 '
8,870,993
24,551,910
20,537,944
16,045,916
14,373,572
13,821,460 '
1 ii -Ifi
'
r
/,!..
-------
Table H
. Eastman Kodak Company, Selected Facilities
Releases and Transfers of TRI Chemicals, 1988-1992
Chemical ' ' Year
TENNESSEE EASTMAN CO. - KINGSPORT
Methyl isobutyl ketone 1988
1989
1990
J / . 1991
; ' 1992
Other 33/50 Program Chemicals 1988
."1989
^ 1990
, " " 1991
' . 1992
Total 33/50 Program Chemicals 1988
' . "1989
1990
1991
' ' 1992
Non 33/50 Program Chemicals " 1988
-,.1989
1990
1991
. , " " 1992
All TRI Chemicals - ' ' 1988
1989
. 1990
"*
1991
1992
Total Air
Emissions
- (pounds)
,TN
1,527,000
135,000
375,000
240,000
27,000
1,388,976
911,995
826,766
685,273
i;050,684
2,915,976
1,046,995
.1,201,766
925,273
1,077,684
43,162,082
44,848,032
39,392,914
39,192,-588
30,846,786
46,078,058
45,895,027
40,594,680
. 40,'l 17,861
31,924,470
Surface
Water
Discharges
(pounds)
23,000
8
18
1,200
560
7,973
1,745
1,802
7,491
2,406
30,973
1,753
1,820
8,691
2,966
1,505,026
3,019,351
2,585,191
373,915
298,588
1,535,999 ,
3,021,104
2,587,011
382,606
^ 301,554
Releases
to Land
(pounds)
" . ' . 75
0
0
29
. ' 3 "
36,270
35,729
155,000
35,200
;. 35,800.
36,345
35,729
155,000
35,229
35,803
75,080
163,302
290,759
46,884
. 160,640
111,425
199,031
445,759
82,113
196,443 "
Transfers
toPOTW
(pounds)
0
o
0
0 .
0
2,946
1,332
3
0
1,069
2,946
1,332'
3
0
1,069
27,929
12,224
14,700
10,731
3,375
30,875
"13,556
14,703
10,731
4,444
Transfers
Off-site
for Treatment/ Total Releases
Disposal/Other and Transfers
(pounds) (pounds) (1)
0
.", ""_' 0 -
, 0
0
0.
. . 65,601
226,683
12,673 '
,7,449
'. : 72,662 .
. 65,601
, 226,683
12,673
7,449
72,662
800,249
842,118
. 17,203
17,971
57,762
865,850 ,
1,068,801
29,876
25,420
130,424
'1,550,075
135,008
375,018
241,229
27,563
1,501,766
1,177,484
996,244
735,413
1,162,621
3,051,841
1,312,492
1,371,262
976,642
1,190,184
45,570,366
48,885,027
42,300',767
39,642,089
31,367,151
48,622,207
50,197,519
43,672,029
40,618,731 .-
32,557,335
-------
1
lit
I *L I
to vo o\
* CO O
^H° V^ OO
IT> ^^ *-H
00 t- f-
o o vo
* t CN
O en o
en -^ en
o vi o
c-- r~- oo
s a 5
O\ O f-
-< -H CM
O * \o" vT
^t-
en
vo
B/~* t> OO VO Tii-HOO OO ON -3-
J3 vo vo vi vo^i-vo CM o CM
o *-* en r-- *< o^ oo^ cn^ -^
JTi , vi \o c»l ON CM t"* ^" oo ON
£ S § oovovo vo oo vo vj rj- CM
EH Q ^ CM "3- °^ °V. *~J, °\ 91 ^
»« ** iI ^< C*l ^H
o /-^ T-X oo t-~ t^-ONen ooc o,
-£ S iX* fC" oo" . en o ON ON r^ oo
oooi ooof-- oooo
C- oo t-^ en^ O^ oo^ o^ oo^ \o^
c^o"o" ^ *^ fc oCm'oo"
j-H,!,-! t-HOO CS'^1''-'
^H^-toJ enenen 1^'Ti"*O
c^ envo ONtriTf ONOOO
T-H »i VD ^-< VO O CS t^ C~^
{A 3 cT xrT c^T o" c^ en" ol t-- »n
Sg ^0000 VO^-<1> OONIO
O £j f- ON ON ON^ ^ O^ t^ O^ O^
^ en" en c^ ^ *^
^^ Q s~* ^ G o ** VD vi r-t vo in
E?.-SJ2 C^OO ONONt VOONC--
^ V? a envovo 'vot*-vi oen*-^
a § en" en" en" "of vo" ^f vq o" co"
r^Q a\enr-- en*no CSONC*-
O .& ON t-{ o^ en^ T-^ o^ en^ oo^ o^
c»f i-T c^T vo" en CM ON -^t- ^4-
*1-~-4*-« *-HCMCM cMenm
Vi C^ CO CO CO CO VI CO CO
CO I""- C""- ^i" CO ^^ ^J" f^" f*^
en CM CM vo ^ oo ,ON^ vo^ o^
ult 9 CM CO vi C~^ v> V) ON vi ^~^
S9 cM-^rvj cMenen ^j-r-ON
O ^Pj CM*--<*-« vot-^t^- oooooo
a o '» o^'t- ON'-
------- |