COOS) I eui|io|f
-------
Cover Photo: the Kakagon Sloughs is located
in northern Wisconsin, on the Bad River
Chippewa Indian reservation. The Tribe
depends on its waters for wild rice harvesting,
fishing, and hunting. The integrity of this
wetland is also important to drinking water
sources in Lake Superior's Chequamegon Bay
region. USEPA Region 5, Great Lakes
National Program Office.
i
<
Office of Ground Water and
Drinking Water (4606-M)
EPA816-K-02-002
www.epa.gov/safewater
June 2002
Printed on Recycled Paper
IV.
V.
VI.
VII.
VIII.
IX.
X.
XI.
Introduction ^
Ensuring Safe Drinking Water Through the Multiples-Barrier Approach 2
SDWA and the Source Water Assessment and Protection Program 5
Tools, Resources, and Actions Useful In Protecting Your Drinking Water Supplies 17
Additional Resources Available Under the Clean Water Act 20
Financing for Source Water Assessment and Protection Programs : 23
The Underground Injection Control (U1C) Program and SWAP 26
SWAP Milestones 28
Best Management Practices (BMPs) Available for SWPAs 29
Glossary 44
Contacts \
Safe Drinking Water Hotline 1 (800) 426-4791 - www.epa.gov/safewater
-------
1
Virtually every stream, lake, river and aquifer in this country is used as a drinking water source.
Protecting these source waters from contaminants is a major national priority in protecting public
health through ensuring a clean, safe drinking water supply. Reducing the threat of waterborne
illnesses helps save hundreds of millions of dollars annually by eliminating costly health care
expenses, lost wages, work absences, decreased job productivity, and additional treatment costs
incurred by Public Water Sytems (PWSs) required to meet federal drinking water quality stan-
dards. The Source Water Protection Program, authorized by the 1996 Amendments to the Safe
Drinking Water Act (SDWA), outlines a comprehensive plan to achieve maximum public health
protection. According to the plan, it is essential that every community take these six steps:
DELINEATE your drinking water source protection area
« INVENTORY known and potential sources of contamination within these areas
DETERMINE THE SUSCEPTIBILITY of your water supply system to these contaminants
NOTIFY AND INVOLVE THE PUBLIC.about threats identified in the contaminant source in-
ventory and what they mean to their PWS.
° IMPLEMENT MANAGEMENT MEASURES to prevent, reduce, or eliminate threats
DEVELOP CONTINGENCY PLANNING STRATEGIES to deal with water supply contamina-
tion or service interruption emergencies
Whether your tap water comes from surface or ground water, all drinking water sources are
vulnerable to a variety of contaminants from a variety of activities. The origin of .contaminants
might be in your neighborhood or many miles away. When rain falls or snow melts, it picks up
and carries away pollutants, depositing them into lakes, rivers, wetlands, coastal and even un-
derground sources of drinking water. Because we know these activities have the potential to
Safe Drinking Water Hotline 1 (800) 426-4791 ° www.epa.gov/safewater
-------
contaminate the source of our drinking water, we have created four major barriers to protect our
rwate from contamination. Preventing pollution is critical to protectmg dnnkir,, water
from contamination and reducing the need for costly treatment. Community involvement and
individual action are key to providing a safe supply of drinking water.
IluB^sMTO. a » ** *" ^W>H » «»n "w " " «>«-« - -
The best way to protect drinking water is to keep contaminants from entering source water.
MultS Sal, state, and local laws and programs and individual action help communfles
identify the sources of drinking water and potential threats. This work enables community to
take appropriate steps to protect the watershed.
The public water system is the first line of defense to reduce or eliminate con ammants_.nsource
water. The Safe Drinking Water Act, which regulates these ^^^^^^^^"tf"^
Sance to help them reach the goal of providing safe and reliable drmkmg water.They must
collect and treat water, hire trained and qualified operators and have an emergency response
plan in case of natural disaster or terrorist attack.
Dealing effectively with risks to drinking water requires constant evaluation of the water quality.
Water is monitored at the source; at the treatment plant, after it has been treated and disin-
fected- at the distribution system, which delivers water through pumps and pipes to your home;
and in'some cases, at the consumer's tap. If systems have difficulty meeting regulations and
providing safe, reliable drinking water, assistance can be provided to help them. If all this tails,
enforcement action can be taken against the system.
Constant vigilance to protect water before it becomes your drinking water is essential and in-
volves all of us. An informed, involved and supportive public is the foundation of drinking water
protection What we do in the watershed can directly impact the quality of water that arrives at
the treatment plant The more you know about drinking water, the better equipped you are to
help protect it. See what you can do in the next section, titled, "What You Can Do to Protect Your
Drinking Water."
Safe Drinking Water Hotline 1 (800) 426-4791 www.epa.gov/safewater
-------
cally, and has resulted in the need for a - »*^,«»»^^
combined and coordinated interdisciplinary
approach in order to address the problem
in a cross-media fashion. Conse-
quently, lessons learned over the
last two decades have enabled
a more comprehensive
understanding of the
concept of cumulative
risk (e.g., net im-
pact from many
media such as air, water, and land uses) and we have modified preventive programs to meet
those changing needs.
The 1996 amendments to the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA 1996) established EPA's Source
Water Assessment and Protection Programs. They are the Agency's newest programs targeted
at providing clean safe drinking water, but they build on programs developed to carry out EPA s
original mission. Congress recognized the need for a more comprehensive and integrated ap-
Zch to the problem of cumulative risk reduction, and SDWA 1996 mandated specific program
elements to address the areas of risk identification (delineation and source inventories), risk
ranking and screening (susceptibility analyses), risk management measures (prevention Programs)
and preparation for unexpected drinking water supply replacement emergencies (contingency
planning).
The SDWA Amendments of 1996 outline six steps for prevention programs to protect and benefit
public drinking water systems. Together, they form the basis of comprehensive (tanking water
source protection.
Safe Drinking Water Hotline 1 (800) 426-4791 www.epa.gov/safewater
-------
STEP 1. - DELINEATE the Source Water Protection Area (SWPA).
PURPOSE: Delineating the SWPA shows the area to be protected and prescribes the bound-
aries of the area from which drinking water supplies are drawn.
This step also designates the area within which contaminant source inventories are con-
ducted, identifying substances or activities that may pose potential risks to the drinking water
supplies withing that area. Delineations may be performed using a variety of accepted meth-
ods (e.g., calculated fixed radius; computer modeling, etc.), and are most protective when
they include all sources of water and potential contaminants and activities affecting them
within the prescribed area.
This map shows the delineation of a Source Water Protection Area.
Safe Drinking Water Hotline 1 (800) 426-4791 www.epa.gov/safewater
-------
STEP 2 - INVENTORY known and potential sources of contamination.
PURPOSE: The source inventory lists all documented and potential contaminant sources or
activities of concern that may be potential threats to drinking water supplies.
The source inventory indicates the level of concern assigned to each potential risk by ranking,
rating, or prioritzing management measures to reduce or eliminate them.
A contaminant source list may look like this:
Potential
Contaminant/Activity Threat or Risk Level of Concern
Agricultural Crop
Spraying
Excess amounts of
material or improper
application methods
Low to moderate, depending on
proximity to source waters
Industrial Waste
Disposal Wells
(e.g., Class V Wells)
Introduction of
chemicals directly into
or above USDWs
Moderate to high, depending on
surrounding hydrogeology
Storm water runoff;
car washes; service
stations
Introduction of
contaminants into
ground or surface water
Low to moderate, depending on type
of surrounding facilities (e.g., parking
lots) and proximity to source waters.
This map inventories known and potential sources of contamination.
Safe Drinking Water Hotline 1 (800) 426-4791 www.epa.gov/safewater
10
-------
; 77
STEP 3 - DETERMINE THE SUSCEPTIBILITY of the PWS to contaminant sources or activi-
ties within the SWPA.
PURPOSE: Determining susceptibility of the PWS to inventoried threats relates the nature and
severity of the threat to the likelihood of source waters serving that system being contaminated.
Mitigating factors taken into account when determining susceptibility include potency or toxicity
of the contaminant, volume of discharge or release, distance from wells or intakes, and the
likelihood of entry of the contaminant into the source waters.
A susceptibility determination for an individual PWS may look like this:
Contaminant/
Activity
Leaking Underground
:, Storage tanks .' :
Concentrated Animal
Feeding Operations
Road SaltStorage Shed
Level of
Concern
V,;High-;; ;..,;
Moderate
Moderate
Risk Reducing
Factors
Remove or Repair Tanks
New/Upgraded Facility
and Equipment
Diked facility with berms
Susceptibility
Rating
High ,
Low
^Moderate
Rails .& High Level of Risk
.&. Medium Level of Risk
Straams A Low Level of Risk
Rivers ^& Stirfaca Water Intaka
This map rates the susceptibility of a PWS to inventoried threats.
Safe Drinking Water Hotline 1 {800} 426-4791 * www.epa.gov/safewater
12
-------
; 13
STEP 4 - NOTIFY AND INVOLVE THE PUBLIC about threats identified in the contaminant
source inventory and what they mean to their PWSs.
PURPOSE: To ensure that the public has information necessary to control and modify their
own actions to prevent contamination and to participate effectively in community activities to
protect drinking water.
- Use plain English in reports
.- Provide maps of the SWPA
- List, show or indicate potential sources/threats to the PWS identified within the SWPA
- List, rank, or otherwise prioritize importance of threats identified to the individual PWS and,
explains what it means to your water supply
- Reports are unique to each individual PWS
- Public meetings are effective methods of involving the community.
STEP 5 - IMPLEMENT MANAGEMENT MEASURES to prevent, reduce, or eliminate risks to
your drinking water supply.
PURPOSE: Using the information gathered from the assessments allows specific manage-
ment measures to be formulated and put in place. By examining the results of the contami-
nant source inventory and the susceptibility determination for each PWS, these measures can
be tailored to address each threat or array of.
risks specific to each PWS.
A successful drinking water contamination
prevention plan is tailored to the unique
concerns and circumstances of the local
community. Effective involvement is a critical
component to a successful public health plan.
- Every PWS's source water is unique.
- Management measures need to tailor local
actions to address threats to your water
supplies.
Safe Drinking Water Hotline 1 (800) 426-4791 B www.epa.gOT/safewater
14
-------
15
- Early involvement in the source water protection process and consensus on need for action
is essential you can help!
- Many players make for broad application and coverage of management strategies that
bring the best individual programs into play. .
- Some key players and tools are:
- local business communities
- media
- parent-teacher associations ,
- citizen activists
- state, county, and local governments
- sanitary surveys
- zoning regulations
- voluntary best management practices (BMPs)
STEP 6 -.DEVELOP CONTINGENCY PLANNING STRATEGIES to deal with water supply
contamination or service interruption emergencies.
PURPOSE: In the event of short- or long-term water drinking water supply disruption as a
result of natural causes (e.g., biological contamination or floods) or intentional destruction
(e.g., vandalism or terrorism), water supply replacement strategies that coordinate all avail-
able efforts to restore service to single or multiple PWSs are an indispensible part of any
drinking water protection program.
- Outline emergency plans for short or long-term drinking water supply replacement
- Direct plan towards water supply interruption due to contamination or physical damage to'
supply system
- Coordinate the efforts of water supply managers with those of civil defense, iocai emer-
gency response, hazmat/spill cleanup, and local area disaster response networks
Safe Drinking Water Hotline 1 (800) 426-4791 www.epa.gov/safewater 16
-------
11
The Safe Drinking Water Act provides for a number of resources to help local communities protect
their drinking water:
Source Water Assessments States are required to complete source water assessments
for every public water supply in the U.S. Congress provided for funds under Section 1453
through the Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (DWSRF) for support.
Drinking Water State Revolving Fund Set Asides States may set aside funds under
1452(g) from the DWSRF up to 10 percent of a state's allotment for the DWSRF to administer
or provide technical assistance. States must match, dollar-for-dollar, the 10 percent set aside
(see Section VIII).
a Drinking Water State Revolving Fund Set Asides States may set aside funds under
1452(k) from the DWSRF up to 15 percent of the state's capitalization grant for more than one
of several source water protection activities (i.e., land acquisition/easements, voluntary
protection and petition activities, source water assessments and well head protection).
° Wellhead Protection Each state must establish a program under Section 1428 to protect
the land areas around water supply wells from contaminants that may enter the ground water
and adversely affect human health.
0 Source Water Petition Program A state may establish a source water protection partner-
ship petition program under 1454 of the Act designed to assist in the local development of a
voluntary, incentive-based partnership between water supplies and community members.
States can use DWSRF funds for loans to water supplies to implement local programs.
9 Water Conservation Planning Guidelines EPA issued guidelines under Section 1455 for
Water conservation plans for public water systems. States may require systems to. submit
water conservation plans as a condition of receiving a DWSRF loan.
° SoSe Source Aquifer Protection Entities may petition EPA for protection of an aquifer that
is the sole or principal source of drinking water for 50 percent or greater of the local population
served (see "Petition's Guidance for Sole Source Aquifers", EPA 44016-87-003 Feb. 1987).
s State Underground Injection ControS ProgramsEPA must review applications under Section
1422 of the Act for state or tribal primacy (primary enforcement responsibility). Approved
programs will be adopted by the state or tribe, which will promulgate rules to ensure non-
endangerment of drinking water sources.
Safe Drinking Water Hotline 11 (800) 426-4791 www.epa.gov/safewater 18
-------
19
Oil and Gas Programs Section 1425 of the Act allows EPA approval of existing state oil
and gas programs if the state can show that the program is effective in preventing endanger-
ment of drinking water supplies.
More Information "State Source Water Assessment and Protection Program Guidance"
(EPA 816-R-97-009 Aug. 1997) on www.epa.gov/safewater/Pubs/index.html discusses these
and other statues and provisions pertaining to Source Water Assessment and Protection.
The Clean Water Act was established by Congress in 1972 and is the primary federal law that
protects our nation's waters, including lakes, rivers, aquifers and coastal areas. The Clean Water
Act's primary objective is to restore and maintain the integrity of the nation's waters. This objec-
tive translates into two fundamental national goals: eliminate the discharge of pollutants into the
nation's waters, and achieve water quality levels that are fishable and swimmable.
a Federal Assistance to States Under Section 106 of the Act, EPA may provide money to
states (including territories, the District of Columbia, tribes) and interstate agencies to establish
and implement ongoing water pollution control programs, including ground water programs.
« Water Quality Standards Under Section 303{C)(1) define water quality goals for a water
body by designating the use of the water, setting criteria to protect those uses, and setting
anti-degradation provisions for the water body. States must update their water quality standards
every three years.
New and revised water quality standards "shall be submitted" to EPA for review. Under Section
303(c)(2) of the Act, water quality standards "shall consist of" designated uses and water
Safe Drinidng Water Hotline 1 (800) 426-4791 www.epa.gov/safewater 20
-------
, - 21
quality criteria. In setting water quality standards, states shall consider the use and value of
public water supplies.
Point Source Effluent Limits, or Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) Under Section
303(d), States "shall identify those waters for which" the point source effluent limits [see
§§301 (fa)(l)(A)-(B)] are not stringent enough to implement a water quality standard, and
establish a ranking of such waters taking into account the severity of pollution and the uses
made of such waters.
Section 303(d)(1) provides for the establishment of TMDLs for pollutants that EPA has listed
under §304(a)(Z) as "suitable for such calculation." States shall set the TMDLs "at a level
necessary to implement the applicable water quality standards with seasonal variation and a
margin of safety taken into account."
Section 303(d)(2) requires States to submit to EPA for approval "from time to time" their list of
impaired and threatened waters and the TMDLs they have established for those waters.
The National Water Quality Inventory Report to Congress Under 305(b) States must
report to EPA on the quality of their waters.
Publishing of TMDLs 304(a)(2) of the Act requires EPA to publish information on, "and the
identification of, pollutants suitable for maximum daily load measurement correlated with the
achievement of water quality objectives."
WPS ProgramStates must 1) conduct statewide assessments of their waters under Section
319 to identify those that were either impaired or threatened because of NPSs; 2) develop
NPS management programs to address the impaired or threatened waters.
Under 212, 319, and 320, funding is provided through the Clean Water State Revolving Fund
(CWSRF) funding is provided for non point source, point source and estuary source water
protection projects, depending on priorities determined by each State.
Dredge and Fill Section 404 regulates the discharge of dredged or fill material into waters
of the U.S.
NPDES ProgramThe National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Programregulates
point source discharges to surface waters under Section '402 of the Act.
Safe Drinking Water Hotline 1 (800) 426-4791 www.epa.gou/safewater 22
-------
There are two major avenues of funding for the drinking water source water assessment and
protection programs. They are the Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (DWSRF) and the Clean
Water Act State Revolving Fund (CWSRF).
Section Description
SDWA 1452 The 1996 Amendments to the Safe Drinking Water Act authorized.the DWSRF
to assist public water suppliers to finance the cost of infrastructure needed
to achieve or maintain compliance with SDWA requirements and to protect
public health. In addition, states may use a portion of their capitalization
grants to fund various state and local water systems management pro-
grams and projects including SWP activities. States may elect to use up to
31 percent of the funds available to them under Section 1452 for eligible
"set-aside" activities. The DWSRF program has made available billions of
dollars in assistance since 1997 to finance infrastructure improvements for
drinking water utilities. States have also reserved $575 million from the
$3.6 billion in federal grants they have received to fund other programs and
activities that support their drinking water programs through these "set-
asides;"
CWA 106; 319 Subchapter VI of the CWASRF provides a powerful partnership between EP
A and the states, providing states with the flexibility to fund projects that
will address the highest priority water quality needs (see Sections 601-
607). CW A funds may be used to fund certain source water protection
activities, and cost savings can be realized through combining SWP and
CWA efforts. CWASRF loans can be used for watershed protection; funds
allocated under Section 106 of the Act may be set aside for state ground
water programs, and Section 319 funds, which are aimed at non-point source
pollution prevention, may also be used for source water protection. Nation-
ally, the CWSRF program has more than $37 billion in assets and has pro-
vided $34 billion in assistance since 1988. The CWSRF program currently
funds nearly $4 billion annually in water-quality related projects, including
more than $1 billion to fund projects addressing non-point sources of pollu-
tion that can often negatively impact sources of drinking water.
Safe Drinking Water Hotline 1 (800) 426-4791 www.epa.gov/safewatss-'
-------
: : _ _ _25
In addition to federal resources, these tools bolster protection at the local level.
- Education: Consumer awareness and citizen advocacy highlight the problem
Voluntary Best Management Practices (BMPs): Once individuals understand they may be
part of the problem, they also understand they can be part of the solution
Sanitary Setbacks are prescribed by local health codes for the placement of individual private
waste disposal systems (septic tanks) and community waste-treatment systems,
6 Zoning has proven to be a very powerful tool in preventing siting of potential contaminant
threats or activities adjacent to public drinking water supply source'waters
The UIC program is a crucial component of the source water assessment and protection program,
because it identifies, permits, and regulates the design, siting, operation, and maintenance of
injection wells that are designed to dispose of waste underground. It is the major federal and
state program to control some 800,000 wells with the potential to contaminate drinking water
sources if not properly managed. The program identifies, as such, these wells are considered
potential contaminant sources in any source water assessment and protection program
contaminant source inventory. For example, ail new motor vehicle waste disposal wells (e.g.,
service station bay floor drains) and all new large-capacity cesspools (e.g., serving multiple
dwellings or single units serving more than 20 persons per day) were banned as of April 2000.
The Safe Drinking Water Act requires EPA to provide safeguards so that injection wells or other
similar conveyance systems do not endanger current and future underground sources of drinking
water (USDWs). .
Through the DIG program, EPA has developed minimum federal standards to regulate wells that
range from deep, technically-sophisticated and highly-monitored wells, to shallow on-site drain-
age systems such as septic systems, cesspools, and storm water drainage wells. These require-
Safe Drinking Water Hotline 1 (800) 426-4791 www.epa.gov/safewater
25
-------
merits also cover wells that discharge a variety of hazardous and nonhazardous fluids above
into, or below aquifers. A comprehensive description of the five different classes of UIC wells
may be found in "Protecting Drinking Water Through Underground Injection Control," EPA 816-K-
EPA's main concern relative to the source water assessment and protection program is the large
inventory of Class V UIC wells - typically shallow on-site drainage systems such as septic
systems, cesspools, and storm water drainage wells. They are a concern because their simple
construction provides little or no treatment of the injected fluids. There are more than 500 000
Class V wells in operation. Some examples are agricultural drainage wells, aquifer recharge and
aquifer storage and recovery wells, industrial waste disposal wells, large capacity cesspools
large capacity septic systems, motor vehicle waste disposal wells, and storm water drainage
wells. There are many other subcategories of Class V wells.
Amendments
toSDWA
Create SWAP
EPA Final
Guidance
for State
SWAPS
to i
en en
co co
States submit
SWAPs for
EPA Review
and Approval
SDWA
1429GW
Report to
Congress
CO CO
EPA's National DW
Contamination
Prevention
Strategy Released
States Begin
Implementing
SWAP Programs
§ 5
CD CD
State SWAs
Due for
Completion
05/03
Transition to
State SWAPS
ill
CX,
The focus of many of EPA's efforts in the 1990s shifted from a cleanup and remediation-oriented
approach to one of prevention. In the next few years, citizens, local, state, tribal, and federal
officials will work together to collect information and take action to protect our precious drinking
water sources. Because of the changing nature of potential threats and local needs, communi-
ties will need to periodically revise their strategies.
Safe Drinking Water Hotline 1 (800) 426-4791 www.epa.gov/safewater
-------
25
In addition to federal resources, these tools bolster protection at the local level.
Education: Consumer awareness and citizen advocacy highlight the problem
0 Voluntary Best Management Practices (BMPs): Once individuals understand they may be
part of the problem, they also understand they can be part of the solution
8 Sanitary Setbacks are prescribed by local health, codes for the placement of individual private
waste disposal systems (septic tanks) and community waste-treatment systems
8 Zoning has proven to be a very powerful tool in preventing siting of potential contaminant
threats or activities adjacent to public drinking water supply source waters
The U1C program is a crucial component of the source water assessment and protection program,
because it identifies, permits, and regulates the design, siting, operation, and maintenance of
injection wells that are designed to dispose of waste underground. It is the major federal and
state program to control some 800,000 wells with the potential to contaminate drinking water
sources if not properly managed. The program identifies, as such, these wells are considered
potential contaminant sources in any source water assessment and protection program
contaminant source inventory. For example, all new motor vehicle waste disposal wells (e.g.,
service station bay floor drains) and all new large-capacity cesspools (e.g., serving multiple
dwellings or single units serving more than 20 persons per day) were banned as of April 2000.
The Safe Drinking Water Act requires EPA to provide safeguards so that injection wells or other
similar conveyance systems do not endanger current and future underground sources of drinking
water (USDWs).
Through the U!C program, EPA has developed minimum federal standards to regulate wells that
range from deep, technically-sophisticated and highly-monitored wells, to shallow on-site drain-
age systems such as septic systems, cesspools, and storm water drainage wells. These require-
Safe Drinking Water Hotline 1 (800) 426-4791 www.epa.gov/safewater 26
-------
: ...__ ; 27
ments also cover wells that discharge a variety of hazardous and nonhazardous fluids above,
.into, or below aquifers. A comprehensive description of the five different classes of UIC wells
may be found in "Protecting Drinking Water Through Underground Injection Control," EPA 816-K-
02-001. '
EPA's main concern relative to the source water assessment and protection program is the large
inventory of Class V UIC wells typically shallow on-site drainage systems such as septic
systems, cesspools, and storm water drainage wells. They are a concern because their simple
construction provides little or no treatment of the injected fluids. There are more than 500,000
Class V wells in operation. Some examples are agricultural drainage wells, aquifer recharge and
aquifer storage and recovery wells, industrial waste disposal wells, large capacity cesspools,
large capacity septic systems, motor vehicle waste disposal wells, and storm water drainage
wells. There are many other subcategories of Class V wells.
Amendments
to SDWA
Create SWAP
EPA Final
Guidance
for State
SWAPs
to r~
en en
en en
States submit
SWAPs for
EPA Review
and Approval
SDWA
1429GW
Report to
Congress
co en
en en
EPA's National DW
Contamination
Prevention
Strategy Released
States Begin
Implementing
SWAP Programs
CM CM CN
State SWAs
Due for
Completion
. 05/03
Transition to
State SWAPs
k
m » u/
So o
o o
CM C"«l CN)
The focus of many of EPA's efforts in the 1990s shifted from a cleanup and remediation-oriented
approach to one of prevention. In the next few years, citizens, local, state, tribal, and federal
officials will work together to collect information and take action to protect our precious drinking
water sources. Because of the changing nature of potential threats and local needs, communi-
ties will need to periodically revise their strategies.
Safe Orinkiisg Water Hotline 1 (800) 426-47S1 ° www.epa.gov/safewater
-------
Category, Activity,
or Threat
impacts, implications,
or Risk
Possible BWIPs Available
Septic Systems
Improper siting, maintenance and
use may contaminate both
surface and ground water by
percolation or runoff.
Bacteria, protozoa, and viruses
present in sanitary wastewater
can cause gastrointestinal illness,
cholera, hepatitis A and typhoid if
consumed.
8 Establish proper siting criteria
° Specify-appropriate design and
construction criteria
a Establish operation and
maintenance protocols
("Septic System Ground Water
Protection" EPA, July 1986
GPO 1991-517-003-28046)
Analyze assimilative capacity
of soils and receiving water to
Category, Activity,
or Threat
Impacts, Implications,
or Risk
Possible BWIPs Available
determine appropriate density
of septic system units.
Consider connecting to a
public water system
Lawn and Garden
Fertilizer
Field leaching or runoff into
surfaee'and ground water.
Nitrogen leaching into drinking
water supplies at levels above
MCLs may cause "blue baby
syndrome" in infants under 6
months: life-threatening
without immediate medical
1 Eliminate excess uses
Ensure proper application
> Select appropriate fertilizer
Avoid application near wells
used for drinking water,
agricultural drainage wells;
surface waters
Safe Drinking Water Hotline 1 (800) 426-4791 www.epa.gov/safewater
30
-------
Category, Activity,
or Threat
Impacts, implications,
or Risk
Possible BMPs Available
attention, Symptoms are
shortness of breath and blue skin
color.
Phosphorus may affect taste and
odor of drinking water and may
require treatment.
1 Plant native plants and
grasses requiring less
fertilizer and water
Pet Waste
Watershed runoff or direct
contact can introduce wastes
into drinking water supplies.
Cryptosporidium; Giardla lamblia,
Salmonella, and £ coli pose the
greatest threats
Pick up after pets
Category, Activity,
or Threat
impacts. Implications,
or Risk
Possible BMPs Available
Pesticide, V - Runoff to surface waters.due to
Application ' rainfall or irrigation return flow.
(Large Scale} ' Soil injection threatens ground
water sources. :
Possible health from exposure to
large amounts of pesticides in
drinking water over a long period
of time include: effects include
cancer, liver and kidney damage,
reproductive difficulties, and
nervous system effects.
tabei
directions
Reduce techniques such as
soil incorporation, pre- and
post-plant emergence
applications, spot treatments;
split applications
Proper storage and disposal
Safe Drinking Water Hotline 1 (800) 426-4791 www.epa.gov/safewater
32
-------
Category, Activity,
or Threat
Impacts, implications,
or Risk
Possible BWiPs Available
Avoid application around
wells used for drinking water,
agricultural drainage wells,
and surface water
Turfgrass/
Agricultural!
Fertilizer
Application
Field leaching or runoff into
surface and ground water.
Nitrogen leaching into drinking
water supplies at levels above
MCLs may cause "blue baby .
syndrome" in infants under 6
months life-threatening
without immediate medical
Utilize application rates and
fertilizer types consistent with
actual plant needs.
' Time applications with periods
of maximum crop uptake
Impede runoff by using tillage
buffer strips, or filter strips
Category, Activity,
or Threat
Impacts, Implications,
or Risk
Possible BSVIPs Available
attention. Symptoms are
shortness ofbreath and blue skin
color.
Phosphorus may affect taste and
odor of drinking water and may
require treatment.
Store and dispose fertilizers
properly
0 Avoid application near wells
used for drinking water
Livestock and
Poultry Waste
High Nitrogen and pathogens
(Cryptosporidium; Giardia
lamblia, Salmonella, and E. coli
can enter both ground and
surface water sources used for
drinking water via runoff or
percolation.
Prevent animal waste contact
with water
1 Ensure proper land application
of manure
Safe Drinking Water Hotline 1 (800) 426-4191 « www.epa.gov/safewater
34
-------
35
Category, Activity, impacts, Implications,
or Threat or Risk
Possible BMPs Available
Avoid application near
drinking water wells and
surface waters
Use pasture, management
techniques such as fencing
and planting legumes
Avoid siting animal waste
lagoons near drinking water
wells or flood plains
Use low-permeability lagoon
.liners: ;
Aerobically compost horse.
manure .
Category, Activity,
or Threat
Impacts, implications,
or Risk
Possible BMPs Available
Piyert wildlife.from serisitye
areas by fencing, mowing,
landscaping, tree pruning, and
drainage devices
Sanitary and
Combined Sewer
Overflows
(SSOs/CSOs)
SStis .discharge untreated
sewage through brokea pipes,
equipment failures and overloads
CSOs discharge untreated .
sewage and storm water when
system capacity is exceeded
Contaminants are bacteria,
molds, ,fungi, protozoa and
helminths
Non-structural prevention
methods such as visual
inspections, monitoring and
maintenence programs,
employee training and public
education
> Consider structural preven-
tion methods such as
upgrading of collection
Safe Drinking Water Hotline 1 (800) 426-4791 ° www.epa.gov/safewater
36
-------
37
Category, Activity,
or Threat
impacts. Implications,
or Risk
Possible BWlPs Available
Chief threats are gastroenteritis,
cholera, dysentery and infectious
hepatitis
systems, wet-weather storage
facilities, and new sewer
collection systems
Injection Wells
(UlC Program),
Ciasses I-!V
Misuse or discharge of
hazardous chemicals into Class
V Wells
See companion Pocket Guide for
descriptions of well classes arid
regulations that apply to each
Injection Wells
(UIC Program),
Class V
Injection of nonhazardous fluids
into or above USDWs
(Available BMPs for selected .
representative examples below)
See vehicle washing, small
. quantity chemical use, and
underground storage tanks
Category, Activity,
or Threat
impacts, implications,
or Risk
Possible BMPs Available
Storm Water Runoff
- Rain or snow runoff
carrying sediments
and contaminants
into surface or
ground waters
- Pathways include
excess volume
runoff from settling
ponds, municipal
storm drains,
parking lots, truck
stops, gas stations,
airports (fuel and
Possible contaminants include
gasoline, oil, automotive fluids,
sediment, pesticides, nutrients,
animal wastes, and hazardous
wastes. Nationally, 77 of 127
priority pollutants have been
detected in urban runoff.
Potential health effects from
these contaminants include
gastrointestinal illness, reproduc-
tive and developmental effects
and increased cancer risk.
Basic pollution prevention
practices such as erosion
control and sedimentation
control measures; land use
controls; grassed swales; buffer
strips; filter strips; storm water
capture and retainment ponds,
and constructed wetlands.
Safe Drinking Water Hotline 1 (800) 426-4791 www.epa.gov/safewater
38
-------
3S
Category, Activity,
or Threat
impacts, Implications,
or Risk
Possible BMPs Available
deicing fluids) and
rqad chemical .
storage
- Sediment and
contaminants
carried to surface
and Aground
waters via ,
infiltration, through
soil of drainage to.
..subsurface dwells
; or .septic systems.;
Category, Activity,
or Threat
impacts, implications,
or Risk
Possible BMPs Available
Vehicle Washing
- Nationally, States
estimate that there
are in excess of
7,200 facilities of
this type currently
in operation.
Contaminants include used oil,
degreasers,-antifreeze and :
synthetic oils. ... :.
Patrons may use solvents or
degreasers at unmanned washing
facilities, thereby contributing to
contamination of rinse waters
entering Class V wells.
Potential health effects from
.these contaminants include
kidney damage; circulatory
problems, increased cancer risk;
delays in physical or mental
development.
1 Use alternative cleansing
agents such as phosphate- .
free, biodegradable
detergents.
1 Discourage use of solvent
and emulsifier-based agents
Install water-recycling
systems
1 Train employees on spill
control and response to
problems
> Control and manage spills
Safe Drinking Water Hotline 1 (800) 426-4791 ° www.epa.gov/safewater
40
-------
41
Category, Activity,
or Threat
Impacts, Implications,
or Bisk
Possible BMFs Available
Small Quantity
Chemical Use
Chemicals of
concern may reach
ground and surface
waters through
improper disposal
practices via
discharge to
sewers, septic
systems, dry wells,
or through improper
handling, hauling
and disposal.
Includes chemicals used in
cleaning, degreasing, polishing,
paint preparation, rust removal,
photo processing, medical
practices.
Avoid excess use of
chemicals
Follow label directions on
proper use, storage and
disposal
9 Train employees on spill
control and response
protocols
> Refer to manufacturer's
Material Safety Data Sheets
for specific hazard
descriptions
Category, Activity,
or Threat
impacts, implications,
or Risk
Possible BiVlPs Available
Underground
Storage Tanks
(USTs}
National inventory
shows approximately
714,000 USTs on
269,000 sites.
Releases of petroleum fuel
substances'through corrosion of
parts, improper installation,
failure of piping systems, sloppy
fuel deliveries, and improper
operation and maintenance
»Ensure compliance with
federal UST requirements
(see: www.epa.oov/oilspill)
Consider local registration
programs for exempt tanks
Consider local land-use
controls such as zoning, use
restrictions, permits and
setbacks
Safe Drinking Water Hotline 1 (800) 426-4791 ° www.epa.gov/safewater
-------
Category, Activity,
or Threat
Impacts, Implications,
or Risk
Possible BMPs Available
Above Ground Release of petroleum fuel
Storage tanks substances mainly through leaks
(ASTs) or spills may enter drinking water
supplies via soil accumulation or
runoff in storm waters to surface
Follow federal AST
requirements
(see: www.epa.gov/oilspiji)
Periodic cleanup of
containment areas
1 Consider local registration
programs for exempt tanks
Consider local land-use
controls such as zoning, use
restrictions, permits and
setbacks .
Aquifer - A natural underground layer, often of sand or gravel, that contains water.
Assessment - An analysis of the susceptibility of drinking water sources to contamination,
communicated effectively to the public.
Ground Water - The water that systems pump and treat from aquifers^
Potential Contaminant Source - Specific point or nonp'oint sources from which contamination
of drinking water may originate; activities that may result in drinking water contamination.
Public Water System (PWS) - Any water system which provides water to at least 25 people for
at least 60 days annually. There are more than 170,000 PWSs providing water from wells, rivers
and other sources to about 250 million Americans. The others drink water from private wells.
There are differing standards for PWSs of different sizes and types.
Risk Ranking - Rating or prioritizing levels of concern of potential contaminant sources based on
susceptibility of public water systems.
Sole Source Aquifer - A drinking water supply in an area with few or no alternative sources to
the ground water resource, and where if contamination occurred, using an alternative source
Safe Drinking Water Hotline 1 (800) 426-4791 www.epa.gov/safewater
44
-------
would be extremely expensive. If such an aquifer supplies a public water system on which at
least 50 percent of the population depends, it may be designated as a sole source aquifer.
Source Water Protection Area - The area delineated by the state for a public water system, or1
including numerous PWSs, whether the source is ground water, surface water, or both. Delineat-
ing the source water protection area is part of the state source water assessment plan approved
by EPA under section 1453 of the Safe Drinking Water Act.
Surface Water - The water that systems pump and treat from sources open to trie atmosphere,
such as rivers, lakes, and reservoirs.
Susceptibility - The level of risk of drinking water contamination, based on the nature and
severity of contaminants, and the likelihood of the contaminants getting into a drinking water
source.
Underground Injection Control Program - A program to prevent injection activities from
endangering underground sources of drinking water.
Wellhead Protection Area - The surface and subsurface area surrounding a well or well field,
supplying a public water system, through which contaminants are reasonably likely to move
toward and reach such water well or field.
The following list includes regional office contacts for Source Water Assessment and Protection
and Underground Injection Control. For state contacts, regional and local contacts at other fed-
eral agencies, and other partners, see www.epa.aov/safewater/prdtect/contacts.html. The Safe
Drinking Water Hotline (bottom of page) also maintains the list of these contacts.
EPA Region 1 - Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont,
Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and Connecticut (617) 918-1578
EPA Region 2 - New York, New Jersey, Puerto Rico
and the U.S. Virgin Islands (212) 637-3822
EPA Region 3 - Pennsylvania Delaware, Maryland,
Virginia, West Virginia, and Washington, DC (215) 814-5779
EPA Region 4 - Kentucky, Tennessee, North Carolina,
South Carolina, Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, and Florida (404) 562-9459
EPA Region 5 - Minnesota, Wisconsin, Illinois,
Michigan, Indiana, and Ohio (312) 886-9262
Safe Drinking Water Hotline 1 (800) 426-4791 www.epa.gov/safewater 46
-------
47
EPA Region 6 - New Mexico, Texas, Oklahoma,
Arkansas, and Louisiana (214) 665-7129
EPA Region 7 - Nebraska, Kansas, Iowa, and Missouri (913) 551-7423
EPA Region 8 - Montana, North Dakota, Wyoming,
South Dakota, Utah and Colorado (303) 312-6753
EPA Region 9 - California, Nevada, Arizona, Hawaii,
Guam, and American Samoa ;.. (415) 744-1829
EPA Region 10-Washington, Oregon, Idaho, and Alaska (206) 553-1563
Headquarters - Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water (202) 564-3867
------- |