&EPA
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Office of Water
(4301)
March 1995
EPA-820-F-95-002
FACT SHEET
GREAT LAKES WATER QUALITY IOTTIATTVE
CASE STUDIES SHOW BENEFITS OUTWEIGH COSTS
EPA evaluated three sites in the Great Lakes Basin to estimate the costs and benefits of the Great
Lakes Initiative (GLI). The three sites are the Fox River in Wisconsin, the Saginaw River in
Michigan, and the Black River in Ohio. EPA analyzed the data from every discharger in the
study areas -- over 300 facilities. The results of the analysis showed the benefits of the GLI
outweighed its costs.
One Million Pounds Cleaner Each Year
The waters in the study areas will be almost one
million pounds cleaner after the GLI is in place.
This means significantly less mercury, PCB's, and
toxic pesticides will be in our water, fish, wildlife,
and people. All of these pollutants are dangerous,
even in small amounts - they are long-lasting, toxic,
and build up as they move through the food chain.
Improved Water Quality Yields Health
and Economic Benefits
EPA estimates that implementation of the GLI will:
• improve human health;
• expand commercial and recreational fishing; and
• improve the quality of swimming and other water
recreation.
It will also improve the quality of all pursuits that
rely on the beauty and health of the Great Lakes.
The total dollar value for improvements in the case
study areas alone is $9.3 million each year. Benefits
across the Great Lakes basin will be higher.
Compliance Costs Are Reasonable
For the three case study areas, the total annual cost
of compliance for all industrial dischargers and all
municipal treatment works ranges from a low of $2.1
million to a high of $3.6 million. If the States and
Tribes use the innovative and flexible provisions of
the GLI, basinwide annual compliance costs will be
less than $100 million for all industrial dischargers
and municipal treatment works.
Benefits and Costs Compared
The estimated average benefits for the three case
studies are about $3.1 million. The average annual
costs for the three case studies are approximately
$2.8 million.
------- |