&EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water (4301) March 1995 EPA-820-F-95-002 FACT SHEET GREAT LAKES WATER QUALITY IOTTIATTVE CASE STUDIES SHOW BENEFITS OUTWEIGH COSTS EPA evaluated three sites in the Great Lakes Basin to estimate the costs and benefits of the Great Lakes Initiative (GLI). The three sites are the Fox River in Wisconsin, the Saginaw River in Michigan, and the Black River in Ohio. EPA analyzed the data from every discharger in the study areas -- over 300 facilities. The results of the analysis showed the benefits of the GLI outweighed its costs. One Million Pounds Cleaner Each Year The waters in the study areas will be almost one million pounds cleaner after the GLI is in place. This means significantly less mercury, PCB's, and toxic pesticides will be in our water, fish, wildlife, and people. All of these pollutants are dangerous, even in small amounts - they are long-lasting, toxic, and build up as they move through the food chain. Improved Water Quality Yields Health and Economic Benefits EPA estimates that implementation of the GLI will: • improve human health; • expand commercial and recreational fishing; and • improve the quality of swimming and other water recreation. It will also improve the quality of all pursuits that rely on the beauty and health of the Great Lakes. The total dollar value for improvements in the case study areas alone is $9.3 million each year. Benefits across the Great Lakes basin will be higher. Compliance Costs Are Reasonable For the three case study areas, the total annual cost of compliance for all industrial dischargers and all municipal treatment works ranges from a low of $2.1 million to a high of $3.6 million. If the States and Tribes use the innovative and flexible provisions of the GLI, basinwide annual compliance costs will be less than $100 million for all industrial dischargers and municipal treatment works. Benefits and Costs Compared The estimated average benefits for the three case studies are about $3.1 million. The average annual costs for the three case studies are approximately $2.8 million. ------- |