United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Office of Water
(4303)
EPA-821-B-98-013
May 1998
&EPA
Cost - Effectiveness Analysis Of
Proposed Effluent Limitations
Guidelines And Standards For
The Transportation Equipment
Cleaning Category
-------
-------
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of
Proposed Effluent Limitations Guidelines
and Standards for the Transportation
Equipment Cleaning Industry
Point Source Category
Prepared for:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Water
Office of Science and Technology
Engineering and Analysis Division
Economic and Statistical Analysis Branch
401 M Street SW (4304)
Washington, DC 20460
Prepared by:
Eastern Research Group, Inc.
110 Hartwell Avenue
Lexington, MA 02173-3198
May 1998
-------
-------
CONTENTS
Page
SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION 1-1
SECTION! METHODOLOGY ........ 2-1
2.1 Selection of Pollutants Effectively Removed . . . . ... . . . . . . . .2-3
-.( ......
2.2 Toxic Weighting Factors . . , . . . .'.-'.' , . . . . 2-3
2.3 POTW Removal Factors 2-10
2.4 Pollutant Removals and Pound-Equivalent Calculations '. 2-10
2.5 Annualized Costs of Compliance . . 2-12
2.6 Calculation of fee Cost-Effectiveness Values . . . . 2-12
2.7 Comparison of Cost-Effectiveness Values . 2-13
SECTIONS POLLUTION CONTROL AND MONITORING OPTIONS 3-1
3.1 Pollution Control Options 3-1
, 3.2 Monitoring Options , 3-1
SECTION 4 RESULTS OF COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS 4-1
4.1 Truck Chemical . , . . . .-...' 4-1
4.2 Rail Chemical . . 4-3
•v • .. . '
4.3 , Barge Chemical and Petroleum . . . .....:....... 4-3
4.4 Truck Petroleum 4-8
4.5 Rail Petroleum . . . , ... . ., 4-8
4.6 TruckFood 4-8
4.7 Rail Food . . . ; 4-13
i • •
-------
CONTENTS
Page
4.8 Barge Food 4-17
4.9 TruckHopper 4-17
„ , •, • , ' . ,f , ' t
4.10 Rail Hopper . 4-17
4.11 Barge Hopper . . . • 4-22
SECTIONS COMPARISON OF COST-EFFECTIVENESS VALUES WITH
PROMULGATED RULES . . 5-1
SECTION 6 COST-REASONABLENESS OF CONVENTIONAL
POLLUTANTS REMOVED . 6-1
6.1 BCT Cost-Reasonableness Test 6-1
6.1.1 POTWTest 6-1
6.1.2 Industry Ratio Test ; .6-2
6.2 Subcategory BCT Tests 6-2
6.2.1 TruckFood 6-3
6.2.2 Rail Food 6-3
6.2.3 Barge Food 6-3
6.2.4 Truck Chemical . 6-7
6.2.5 RailChemical . 6-7
6.2.6 Barge Chemical and Petroleum 6-7
6.2.7 Barge Hopper 6-11
SECTION? REFERENCES 7-1
APPENDIX A
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION FOR COST-
EFFECnVENESS ANALYSIS: POLLUTANT LOADINGS
AND POUND EQUIVALENTS REMOVED
APPENDIX B
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION FOR COST-
EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS: BASELINE POLLUTANT
DISCHARGES IN POUNDS AND POUND EQUIVALENTS
11
-------
CONTENTS
Page
APPENDIX C
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION FOR COST-EFFECTIVENESS
ANALYSIS: CONVENTIONAL POLLUTANT REMOVALS
APPENDIX D
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION FOR COST-EFFECTIVENESS
ANALYSIS: BASELINE CONVENTIONAL POLLUTANT
DISCHARGES
m'
-------
IV
-------
SECTION 1
INTRODUCTION
**• . - /
This cost-effectiveness analysis presents an evaluation of the technical efficiency of pollutant control
options for the proposed Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Transportation Equipment
Cleaning Industry based on Best Available Technology Economically Achievable (BAT) and Pretreatment
Standards for Existing Sources (PSES).1 For the purposes of this analysis, the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) has divided the Transportation Equipment Cleaning (TEC) industry into 11 subcategories on
lie basis of the commodity transported and the mode of transportation:
• Truck Chemical (TT/CHEM) ,
• Rail Chemical (RT/CHEM)
• Barge Chemical and Petroleum (TB/CHEM)2
• Truck Petroleum (TT/PETR) ;
• Rail Petroleum (RT/PETR)
• truck Food (TT/FOOD)
• Rail Food (RT/FOOD)
• h i
• Barge Food (TB/FOOD)
• Track Hopper (TH/HOPPER)
1 Best Available Technology Economically Achievable (BAT) is required under Section 304(b)(2) of the
Clean Water Act These rules control the discharge of priority and non-conventional pollutants and apply to
existing industrial dischargers. Pretreatment Standards for Existing Sources (PSES) are analogous to BAT;
these rules apply to indirect dischargers (whose discharges flow to publicly owned treatment works (POTWs).
2 Effluent sampling found no significant difference between Barge Chemical and Barge Petroleum
subcategories; therefore, these two subcategories were combined into a single Barge Chemical and Petroleum
subcategory; see the Development Document (U.S. EPA, 1998b) for details.
1-1
-------
• Rail Hopper (RH/HOPPER)
• Barge Hopper (BH/HOPPER)
In this analysis, EPA compares the total pretax annualized cost of each regulatory option to the
corresponding effectiveness of that option in reducing the discharge of pollutants. EPA evaluates the
effectiveness of each option in terms of costs per pound of pollutant removed, weighted by the relative
toxicity of the pollutant. EPA also provides the rationale for using this measure, which is referred to as
pound equivalents removed.
This cost-effectiveness analysis is based on two surveys conducted by EPA. The first, called the
scrcener survey, listed 16 questions and was sent to 3,267 industry participants that might be affected by the
rule (LJ.S. EPA, 1993). From the results of the screener survey, EPA identified 734 facilities with TEC
operations that might be affected by the rule. These facilities formed the universe from which a stratified
sample was drawn for the second survey, a detailed questionnaire (U.S. EPA, 1995).
In general, EPA estimated cost-effectiveness and economic impacts for subcategories and discharge
status using data from the detailed questionnaire. Cost-effectiveness is also estimated for subcategories where
certain types of dischargers are represented only by screener data. Unless otherwise specified in the text,
however, cost-effectiveness is estimated on the results of the detailed questionnaire.
Section 2 discusses EPA's cost-effectiveness methodology and identifies the pollutants included in
the analysis. This section also presents EPA's toxic weighting factors for each pollutant and considers the
removal efficiency of each pollution control option. Section 3 describes the options evaluated for each
subcatcgory. Section 4 presents the results of the cost-effectiveness analysis. In Section 5, cost-effectiveness
values for proposed TEC industry options are compared to cost-effectiveness values for other promulgated
rules. Section 6 discusses the two-part cost-reasonableness test for BCT options. Appendix A presents data
on pollutants, pollutant removals, and pound equivalents removed. Appendix B presents data on pollutants
discharged at baseline. Appendixes C and D present data on conventional pollutant removals and discharges,
respectively.
1-2
-------
SECTION 2
METHODOLOGY
The cost-effectiveness of the TEC Industry Guidelines and Standards is evaluated as the incremental
annualized cost of a pollution control option in an industry or industry subcategory per incremental pound
equivalent of pollutant (i.e., pound of pollutant adjusted for toxicity) removed by that control option. EPA
uses the cost-effectiveness analysis primarily to compare the removal efficiencies of regulatory options under
consideration for a rule. A secondary and less effective use is to compare the cost-effectiveness of the
options for the TEC Industry Guidelines and Standards to that of effluent guidelines and standards for other
industries.
EPA ranks pollution control options in order of increasing pound equivalents removed in order to
identify the point at which increased removal of pollutants is no longer cost-effective. Generally, EPA
determines this to be where the marginal cost per pound equivalent removed increases sharply; that is, where
relatively few incremental pounds are removed for steady increases in cost. Figure 2-1 shows this point as
Point A, where the cost-effectiveness curve becomes nearly vertical. Increases in removals beyond Point A
come only at relatively high unit costs, which, in many cases, EPA may determine exceeds the relative benefit
to society.
"..'•'.• ' ' " f
To develop a cost-effectiveness study, the following number of steps must be taken to define the
analysis or generate data used for calculating values:
• Determine the pollutants effectively removed from the wastewater
• Estimate the relative toxic weights (the adjustments to pounds of pollutants to reflect
toxicity) of the pollutants effectively removed
• Estimate the POTW removal factors the adjustments to pounds of pollutant to reflect the
ability of a POTW to remove specified pollutants
• Define the regulatory pollution control options
• Calculate pollutant removals for each pollution control option
2-1
-------
•§
8.
I
Range of
noncost-
effective
removals
"^ Range of
v '« cost-effective
H removals
1.00
Percentage of pound equivalents removed.
Figure 2-1. Cost effectiveness
2-2
-------
• Determine the annualized cost of each pollution control option
Once cost-effectiveness values are calculated, various regulatory options under consideration can be
compared. The following seven sections discuss each of the six preliminary steps and the cost-effectiveness
calculation and comparison methodologies.
2.1 SELECTION OF POLLUTANTS EFFECTIVELY REMOVED
EPA considers several factors in selecting pollutants for regulation, including toxicity, frequency of
occurrence in wastestream effluent, and amount of pollutant in the wastestream. The list of pollutants
considered, therefore, differs by subcategory. Table 2-1 is a master list of the pollutants effectively removed
and the'subcategories in which they are considered.
2.2 TOXIC WEIGHTING FACTORS
Cost-effectiveness analyses account for differences in toxicity among the pollutants using toxic
weighting factors. Accounting for these differences is necessary because the potentially harmful effects on
human and aquatic life are specific to the pollutant For example, a pound of zinc in an effluent stream has a
significantly different, less harmful effect than a pound of PCBs. Toxic weighting factors for pollutants are
derived using ambient water quality criteria and toxicity values. For most industries, toxic weighting factors
are developed from chronic freshwater aquatic criteria. In cases where a human health criterion has also been
established for the consumption offish, the sum of both the human and aquatic criteria are used to derive
toxic weighting factors. The factors are standardized by relating them to a "benchmark" toxicity value, which
was based on the toxicity of copper when the methodology was developed.3 Table 2-1 presents the toxic
weighting factors used for the regulated pollutants in this cost-effectiveness analysis.
3 Although the water quality criterion has been revised (to 12.0 /*g/l), all cost-effectiveness analyses for
effluent guideline regulations continue to use the former criterion of 5.6 pg/l as a benchmark so mat cost-
effectiveness values can continue to be compared to those for other effluent guidelines. Where copper is
present in the effluent, the revised higher criterion for copper results in a toxic weighting factor for copper
of 0.467 rather than 1.0.
' ' •' • '' 2-3 - • ' '
-------
I .*,
S
.j
* 1
.
f
ft
•I!
J
xx
XXXX XXXX X XX XX XXX XX
X X XXXXXXXXXXXX
X
X X
X X
X XX X
X
xxxx
.Si
1 8 >
I 2 i
i I
I L
X X XX XXXXXXXXXX
XXX X
t
ft ?!
u I,
I
1
X X
< <
ii
5 CT.
1
o
, »
-
X XXXXXXXXXXX XX
0999
I 9
\o«*lsmfif^»n55r4nc2f^r3Qr2
8999999999999999
gooooooooogoogoo
S
•s
i if 21
u
o
g2N
«O —
g ">. s
•= ^ n
111
81
|1
E 4
X XXX XX
8888995 S'? S 5 8 S
UJUJWUJUJPJUitUUJLTiWtUPJ
S888SSSS. S. g§SS
5 S S S S ? S ^^9 9 ? 9
uiiuuiumu
*
2
1
i
'II
'!!
SI
n 1
en S
*N CO
I
%
1 I1
iff'
|-1 a.
u .& .2
CQ CQ CQ '
I
o a
^s
2-4
-------
I
o
S
ta
u. •
f I
u "*•
J U
a g
u
.1
|
I
1
•
ot
Tank Barge
Rail Tank Cat
S
£
s
&
. 1
Chemical
Petroleum
1
1
. - • 1
: Til
2| •£
1
=" ,- ~
i2 -5 |2 H
Pollutant
SEM1VOLATILES (continued)
XX XX XXX XXX X X X X X X X X X X X X X
XXXX XXXX X XXXXX • X X X X
X
X
XX XXXX
XXXXX XX XXXXX
XXXX X XX X X XX XX X XXXX
X
XXX X X XXX ,XX X X X X
S S o 5
XXXX
<<<<<<
-------
DO
i nr
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'xxx
a
xxxx xxxxx
XX
XX
<<<<» <<<<<
-------
s
1 n
o
X
a
«
CO
1
^^
1
i
w
J
CO
£•
1 i Pi
s
1
J
O .
S
bl ,
E
2
a
•z.
•A
ACTORS, ,
b-
U
Z
M
|
I
%
u
. a
m
' 1
1
£
'n
a!
Truck Tank
-
, H
' 1
&
1
Petroleum
|
tt.
Is
•s
J
, u
g
1
I
.^
3
*E
S
S.
CJ i
o ^ -
i
1
j
2
•gjl
^
f±
BO .
•ilag
£1! E
' • I
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXX
<•. 't .s .a .a
p jr f a a &
.5
s ^
a E .1 a s s-'fl '
i£Uai££s5oriHHt-H
2-7
-------
\\
ll
II
M i
I
4
f
£ •?
XXX XXXXXX
XXX XX
X XX XX
XXX XX
X X XX XXX XXXX
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXXXXXXXXXX X X
X X
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X XX XX
i r
i 5
i i i i i i i 1 i 1 i
V)w»-iv^MMM~«'<*'>n
rti UJ UJ
UJ
•g
•S
a.
• a
9 9 = 9 9 99 9 9
999999999
«
i
I
•Hill Igajss 21 Ji| fill I lllc-s allfll
5S Ss g -s s s S SS £ 1111II 3 3 fl 6 3 II 5 i i i I 2!
2-8
-------
•g!
3
en
et
1
Id
flS
£
"S 5
a~
1
T
^
A
Id
oa
'U
I
o
X
o
n "So u
(2-|£
• X
X X
xxxxxxxxxxx
XXXXXXXXX XX
X X
1111
II
"* *"*
o
<,CQCQ<"CQ<
g §
N K
iiiir
£*'
2-9
-------
Examples of the effects of different aquatic and human health criteria on freshwater toxic weighting
factors are presented in Table 2-2. As shown in this table, the toxic weighting factor is the sum of two
criteria-weighted ratios: the former benchmark copper criterion divided by the human health criterion for the
particular pollutant and the former benchmark copper criterion divided by the aquatic chronic criterion. For
exaniple, using the values reported in Table 2-2,11 pounds of the benchmark chemical (copper) pose the
,i , i : jjj, i. t , ' / '.'.'' ;;' '•'.•• ' ' • i " ', ' ' •' ! : ,' !• .! . , !,
same relative hazard in freshwater as one pound of cadmium because cadmium has a freshwater toxic weight
11 times greater than the toxic weight of copper (5.16 divided by 0.467 equals 11.05).
• t
2.3 POTW REMOVAL FACTORS
Calculating pound equivalents for direct dischargers differs from calculating for indirect dischargers
because of the ability of POTWs to remove certain pollutants. The POTW removal factors are used as
follows: If a facility is discharging 100 pounds of cadmium in its effluent stream to a POTW and the POTW
has a 38 percent removal efficiency for cadmium, then the cadmium discharged to surface waters is only 62
pounds (1 minus 0.38 equals 0.62). If the regulation reduces cadmium discharged in the effluent stream to
the POTW by 50 pounds, then the amount discharged to surface waters is calculated as 50 pounds multiplied
by the POTW removal factor (50 pounds times 0.62 equals 31 pounds). The cost-effectiveness calculations
then reflect the fact that the actual reduction of pollutant discharged to surface water is not 50 pounds (the
change in the amount discharged to the POTW), but 31 pounds (the change in the amount actually discharged
to surface water). A pollutant discharge that is unaffected by the POTW has a removal factor of 1. Table 2-1
presents the POTW removal factors for pollutants included in this analysis.
2.4 POLLUTANT REMOVALS AND POUND-EQUIVALENT CALCULATIONS
The pollutant loadings have been calculated for each facility under each regulatory pollution control
option for comparison with baseline (i.e., current practice) loadings. Pollutant removals are calculated simply
as the difference between current and post-treatment discharges. These pollutant removals are converted into
pound equivalents for the cost-effectiveness analysis. For direct dischargers, removals in pound equivalents
are calculated as:
2-10
-------
TABLE 2-2
• • , ^ „• « , '
EXAMPLES OF TOXIC WEIGHTING FACTORS
BASED ON COPPER FRESHWATER CHRONIC CRITERIA
Pollutant
Copper
Cadmium
Naphthalene
Human Health
Criteria
fcg/1)
84
41,026
Aquatic
Chronic
Criteria (jig/l)
12.0
1.1
370
Weighting
Calculation
5.6/12,0
5.6/84 + 5.6/1.1
5.6/41,026 +f5.6/370
Toxic
Weighting
Factor
0.467
5.16
0.015
Notes: Human health and aquatic chronic criteria are maximum contamination thresholds. Units for
criteria are micrograms of pollutant per liter of water. ,
Source: Versar, Inc., 1995. . .
2-11
-------
RemovalSp,. = RemovalSp,,,^ x Toxic weighting factor
For indirect dischargers, removals in pound equivalents are calculated as:
Removals = Removals^^ x Toxic weighting factor x POTW removal factor
Total removals for each option are then calculated by adding up the removals of all pollutants included in the
cost-effectiveness analysis for a given subcategory. Total pollutant and pound-equivalent removals estimated
for each option are presented by subcategory in Appendix A.
' !"! " ' ' ' ' ''....',
2.5 ANNUALIZED COSTS OF COMPLIANCE
Annualized costs of compliance have been developed for each regulatory pollution control option
(see the Economic Analysis for proposal (U.S. EPA, 1998a). In brief, the annualized cost considers the
capital investment needed to purchase and install new equipment, the annual cost of operating and
maintaining the equipment, and the cost of money needed to finance the investment. The annualized costs
presented in Section 4 represent the pre-tax costs to the TEC industry.
*/
2.6 CALCULATION OF THE COST-EFFECTIVENESS VALUES
Cost-effectiveness ratios are calculated separately for direct and indirect dischargers and by
subcategory. Within each of these many groupings, the pollution control options are ranked in ascending
order of pound equivalents removed. The incremental cost-effectiveness value for a particular control option
is calculated as the ratio of the incremental annual cost to the incremental pound equivalents removed. The
incremental effectiveness may be viewed primarily in comparison to the baseline scenario and to other
regulatory pollution control options. Cost-effectiveness values are reported in units of dollars per pound
equivalent of pollutant removed.
2-12
-------
For the purpose of comparing cost-effectiveness values of options under review to those of other
promulgated rules, compliance costs used in the cost-effectiveness analysis are adjusted to 1981 dollars using
Engineering News Records Construction Cost Index (CCI). This adjustment factor is calculated as follows:
Adjustment factor = 1981 CCI/1994 CCI - 3,535/5,408 - 0.654
The equation used to calculate incremental cost-effectiveness is:
where:
CElc= Cost-effectiveness of Option k
ATCk= Total annualized treatment cost under Option k
PEk= Pound equivalents removed by Option k
Cost-effectiveness measures the incremental unit cost of pollutant removal of Option k (in pound
equivalents) in comparison to Option k-1. The numerator of the equation, ATC^. minus ATC^i, is simply the
incremental annualized treatment cost in moving from Option k-1 (an option that removes fewer pound
equivalents of pollutants) to Option k (an option that removes more pound equivalents of pollutants).
Similarly, the denominator is the incremental removals achieved in going from Option k-1 to k.
2.7 COMPARISON OF COST-EFFECTIVENESS VALUES
Because the options are ranked in ascending order of pound equivalents of pollutants removed, any
pollution control option that has higher costs but lower removals than another option can be immediately
identified (the cost-effectiveness value for the next option becomes negative). When negative values are
computed for Option k, Option k-1 is considered "dominated" (having a higher cost and lower removals than
Option k). Option k-1 is then removed from cost-effectiveness calculations, and all cost-effectiveness values
within a regulatory grouping are then recalculated without the dominated option. This process continues until
2-13
-------
all dominated options are eliminated. The remaining options can then be presented as viable in terms of their
incremental cost-effectiveness values for regulatory consideration.
2-14
-------
SECTION 3
POLLUTION CONTROL AND MONITORING OPTIONS
EPA may subcategorize an industry to establish effluent limitations guidelines based on untreated
wastewater characteristics, commodity transported, mode of transportation, or other factors. EPA divided the
TEC industry into 11 subcategories, listed in Section 1, based on the commodity transported and the mode of
transportation. In addition to subcategories;, facilities are also identified by discharge status: direct or
indirect. BAT applies to direct dischargers; PSES applies to indirect dischargers. Additional pollutants may
be controlled or reduced by BAT and PSES, but are not part of the cost-effectiveness analysis because 1) a
toxic weighting factor is not available for the pollutant, or 2) reliable estimates of pollutant removals are not
available.
3.1 POLLUTION CONTROL OPTIONS
The Development Document (U.S. EPA, 1998b) presents a detailed description of the TEC industry
subcategories and pollution control options for each subcategory. Table 3-1 outlines the technology options
for each of the TEC industry subcategories. EPA developed between one and three technology options for
each subcategory based on incremental technology additions to a wastewater treatment train. Each
succeeding option builds on the previous option. The incremental or differentiating technology for a
succeeding option is in italics. •
3.2 MONITORING OPTIONS
EPA considered each technology option with up to six monitoring options:
• No monitoring
• Quarterly
3-1
-------
TABLE 3-1
TECHNOLOGY OPTIONS FOR TEC INDUSTRY SUBCATEGORIES
Option
Description
Truck Chemical Direct Dischargers
1'
2
Flow reduction, equalization, oil/water separation, chemical oxidation, neutralization,
coagulation, clarification, biological treatment, and sludge dewatering
Flow reduction, equalization, oil/water separation, chemical oxidation, neutralization,
coagulation, clarification, biological treatment, activated carbon adsorption, and sludge
dewatering
Truck Chemical Indirect Dischargers
1
2
Flow reduction, equalization, oil/water separation, chemical oxidation, neutralization,
coagulation, clarification, and sludge dewatering
Flow reduction, equalization, oil/water separation, chemical oxidation, neutralization,
coagulation, clarification, activated carbon adsorption, and sludge dewatering
Rail Chemical Direct Dischargers
I2
2
3
Flow reduction, oil/water separation, equalization, biological treatment, and sludge
dewatering
Flow reduction, oil/water separation, equalization, dissolved air flotation (with
flocculation and pH adjustment), biological treatment, and sludge dewatering
Flow reduction, oil/water separation, equalization, dissolved air flotation (with
flocculation and pH adjustment), biological treatment, or gano-clay /activated carbon
adsorption and sludge dewatering
Rail Chemical Indirect Dischargers
1
2
3
Flow reduction, and oil/water separation
Flow reduction, oil/water separation, equalization,' dissolved air flotation (with
flocculation andpH adjustment), and sludge dewatering
Flow reduction, oil/water separation, equalization, dissolved air flotation (with
flocculation and pH adjustment), or gano-clay /activated carbon adsorption, and sludge
dewatering
3-2
-------
TABLE 3-l(continued)
TECHNOLOGY OPTIONS FOR TEC INDUSTRY SUBCATEGORIES
Barge Chemical Direct Dischargers
1
2
Flow reduction, oil/water separation, dissolved air
treatment, and sludge dewatering
Flow reduction, oil/water separation, dissolved air
treatment, reverse osmosis, and sludge dewatering
flotation, filter press, biological
flotation, filter press, biological
; Barge Chemical Indirect Dischargers
1
2
3
Flow reduction, oil/water separation, dissolved air
Flow reduction, oil/water separation, dissolved air
biological treatment, and sludge dewatering
Flow reduction, oil/water separation, dissolved air
treatment, reverse osmosis, and sludge dewatering
flotation, and in-line filter press
flotation, in-line filter press,
flotation, in-line filter press, biological
Food Grade
1
2
Flow reduction, and oil/water separation
Flow reduction, oil/water separation, equalization,
dewatering <
biological treatment, and sludge
• '•'•:•••••'•••- •-•. ••.-':;-.•:;..;.': :i •:•• ..:::.'vV ;i:.:, , •:,::::;*. :r ;;:;;:•,:;•:>:;;':,• Petroleum - • ,—y.--:/; .
I3
2
Flow reduction,equalization, oil/water separation, and chemical precipitation
Flow reduction, equalization, oil/water separation, activated carbon adsorption, and
recycle/reuse .
: : -.. ; • . v\;'';^-->?;V"-^^x^H^per^ V'^ ^^M^"^ . ^ :': :? . : " 'v-
1 .
Flow reduction, and gravity separation
Note: EPA developed options based on incremental technology additions to a wastewater treatment train.
Each succeeding option builds on the previous option. The incremental, or differentiating, technology
for a succeeding option is in italics.
1 Option 1 has identical costs and removals as Option 2.
2 Equalization was originally costed with Option 2, but later moved to Option 1; costs have not been adjusted.
3 Because Option 1 would result hi higher costs and lower removals than Option 2, it was not completely
costed.
3-3
-------
» .. Bimonthly
• Monthly
• Combination of weekly and monthly
« \yeekly
For example, EPA developed three technology options for the Rail Chemical subcategory (see Table 3-1)
•with four monitoring options. This results in 12 separate cost combinations. This cost-effectiveness analysis
'•'. • , f I'iijj .' • • .•''', , _ " '•:'•,' l' • '' ,' •• ' •':•'•': ;;• i , 'I .•:••• • ' • . . ,
presents costs and pollutant removals associated with monthly monitoring for all indirect dischargers, and
: ,h i j'^i M n i, • , / j „ i , • •, 11 , ;• i , ' „ \ „, ', , , i : •
costs and removals for a combination of monthly and weekly monitoring for direct dischargers.
3-4
-------
SECTION 4
RESULTS OF COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS
EPA calculated cost-effectiveness (CE) ratios for direct and indirect dischargers in the 11 TEC
industry subcategories. This section presents the ratios by subcategory. (Section 3 outlines technology
options for each subcategory.) Costs are presented on a pre-tax basis in 1981 dollars; costs are estimated in
1994 dollars and deflated to 1981 dollars to facilitate comparison with effluent guidelines of other industries.
The CE ratios are expressed on an incremental and average basis. Average CE is equal to total option costs
divided by total option removals. Although the decision on the relative cost-effectiveness of an option is
based on the incremental CE ratio, average CE also provides useful information about removal efficiencies.
The monitoring frequency included in the costs is listed for each table. Because the primary purpose
of cost-effectiveness analysis is the comparison of the removal efficiencies of technology options, and
monitoring adds costs but no pollutant removals, the CE comparison needs .to be made using the same
monitoring option for all technology options in the comparison.
Where data are based on fewer than three unweighted facilities, the removal and/or the cost data may
be suppressed in order to protect confidential business information. Such entries are marked "ND" for not
disclosed.
4.1 TRUCK CHEMICAL
All Truck Chemical facilities contained in the detailed questionnaire database are indirect
dischargers; however, direct dischargers were identified in the screener questionnaire data.
Table 4-1 presents the results of the CE analysis for direct dischargers. This analysis is based on
unweighted data because the facilities are only present in the screener database. There are two technology
options for direct dischargers in this subcategory (see Table 3-1). Option 1 results in identical costs and
4-1
-------
I11
"
CO
O O
P —
O n
*~ w
J H
-i 1
z § *
IBSS
z 5 w n
o 3 o S
JSOFPOLLUTI
HEMICAL SUB'
IECTDISCHAR
MONTHLYAVI
!Ss§
Cd U (21
>; p O g <^
; w ^
•„. .ts t> pj
Sto > ^^
.. O •£} CO
g U g 2
C ^^ €^
A p3 ""^
Pre-tax
Annualized
Cost
($1981)
•all-
§1 1 P
,£ -| | 2i
t F^ *^2 to OO
I 03 ^j ^^
!•«
'•2J £ ~
S 13 o W
o .S S 5i
PL, S o ^^
[if1*
O C
•-. .-Q.O
H
- • < ta
.2 S
S J5 S o
co
•s s
g.s
a S
co jo
"O co
— o
i"S
a -5
•22
a, ..
O P
4-2
-------
removals as Option 2. The incremental CE ratio is $602 under Option 2. Option 2 is the proposed option for
direct dischargers in the Truck Chemical subcategory.
Table 4-2 presents the results of the CE analysis for the indirect dischargers. There are two
technology options for the Truck Chemical Indirect Dischargers subcategory (see Table 3-1). The
incremental CE ratio ranges from $86/pound equivalents (pe) under Option 1 to $309/pe under Option 2.
Option 2 is the proposed option for indirect dischargers in the Truck Chemical subcategory,
4.2 RAIL CHEMICAL
All Rail Chemical facilities in the detailed questionnaire database are indirect dischargers; however,
1'
direct dischargers were identified in the screener questionnaire data. Table 4-3 presents the results of the CE
analysis for direct dischargers. This analysis is based on unweighted data, because the facilities are only
present in the screener database. There are three technology options for the Rail Chemical Direct Dischargers
subcategory (see Table 3-1). The incremental CE ratio ranges from $84 under Option 1 to $526 under
Option 3. Option 1 is the proposed option for direct dischargers in the Rail Chemical subcategory.
Table 4-4 presents the results of the CE analysis for the indirect dischargers. There are three
technology options for the Rail Chemical Indirect Dischargers subcategory (see Table 3-1). The incremental
CE ratio ranges from $56/pe under Option 1 to $362/pe under Option 3. Option 1 is the proposed option for
indirect dischargers in the Rail Chemical subcategory.
4.3 BARGE CHEMICAL AND PETROLEUM
: - ' ' . %,
The Barge Chemical and Petroleum subcategory includes both direct and indirect dischargers. Table
i
4-5 presents the results of the CE analysis for the direct dischargers. There are two technology options for
direct dischargers in this subcategory (see Table 3-1). The incremental CE ratio ranges from $104/pe under
Option 1 to $l,444/pe under Option 2. Option 1 is the proposed option for direct dischargers in the Barge
Chemical and Petroleum subcategory.
4-3
-------
TABLE 4-2
\
j/}
O
P
cu
o
Q
Z
ENESS OF POLLUTION CO
g
C*
fa
i
t™J
O
u
S
O
CK CHEMICAL SUBCATEG
1
INDIRECT DISCHARGERS
.
Bf
2
.. ,L. 0
I
MONTHLY MONITORING
- "
w
C3
i
§
G
HH
Incremental
3
J
"^
2
£
a
*r
£
1
o
OH
1
|
O
OH
co
O
O
.^
O
o
u
^
^
Equivalents
"N
CN
*c3
-------
CO
r<->
TABLE 4-3
cc
. Z
0
NH
£
0
N CONTRO
S OF POLLUTIO
C/2
Z
H"M
1
1
l*H
S
0
u
TEGORY
EMICAL SUBCA
ffl
U
3
'
Ed
ECT DISCHARG
a
3
.
O
•
-------
TABLE 4-4
•
^ so oo ON
»-i 10 r^» ON
4> pij|
a tls £ S
;:
O O -^! OO
> O o <^
"^ *** co
W ^
CO
Z
g
0
L
S 0
OF POLLUTION CC
MICALSUBCATEGi
SCT DISCHARGERS
HLY MONITORING
rr\ r-rl S P— I
^ BC H Z
E3 H_} fe 2
^y_ ^2
gS
fa
&•<
w
oo
o
U
,:
CO
*2 CO ••— \
.' ..S JJ W
e c OL,
0 -i 0 *i!
g CO > •— I
2 O "5 o\
•9 w^
Incremental
"3
s
J
_j
•*-*
* N C1
S ~ to oo
2 g 6 2
*3
Pound
Equivalents
Removed
(PE)
•o
.
-------
TABLE 4-5
C0
£ .
•o o
H 5
ft «•
o S
w
i-Q H
•SB" 1
*| -3
§g2§
£3B§
5S OF POLLUTI
HEMICAL SUB
lECT DISCHAR
MONTHLYAVI
rs CJ ^ to
W.w 2 S
2 U O °
wo 'z •
n 1
U tt < \
1 -. 1
H O
g U
-U
i
1
1-1
.1
12
"o
H
C/3 '•"•
C5 QJ
_j .J* -4> ^
- 5 w ^ ^"^
(D O '^ OO
^ ° 8 2
'< -Saw
3- | w
C , C Cb
53 *1» so
; . . i—i
.<3 CS 00
J2| ^H O
r~* oo"
co r-~
^t* ^O
1 »s *\
, ,_H »— 1
^^ «Hl4 f^
O SO CN
<0 (N
00^ O^.
en" ^
0 -* CS
.Sac
"3 o o
%%%
CQ O O
4-7
-------
Table 4-6 presents the results of the CE analysis for the indirect dischargers in the Barge Chemical
and Petroleum subcategory. There are three technology options for the Barge Chemical and Petroleum
Indirect Dischargers subcategory (see Table 3-1). The incremental CE ratio ranges from $838/pe under
Option 2 to $15,364/pe under Option 3. EPA has chosen not to set pretreatment standards for existing
indirect dischargers in the Barge Chemical and Petroleum subcategory at this time.
4.4 TRUCK PETROLEUM
' ,11 ' '' , „ ' ' , , ;
All Truck Petroleum facilities in the detailed questionnaire database are indirect dischargers. Table
4-7 presents the results of the CE analysis for the indirect dischargers. There are two technology options for
indirect dischargers in the Petroleum subcategory (see Table 3-1). Option 1 results in higher costs and lower
removals than Option 2, and therefore was not completely costed. The incremental CE ratio is $24,3 62/pe •
under Option 2. EPA has chosen not to regulate the Truck Petroleum subcategory at this time.
4.5 RAIL PETROLEUM ,
i •! , „ • ' ' , • ,s '
• '' • i, „,,',,.'',
All Rail Petroleum facilities in the detailed questionnaire database are indirect dischargers. Table
4-8 presents the results of the CE analysis for the indirect dischargers. There are two technology options for
indirect dischargers in this subcategory (see Table 3-1). Option 1 results in higher costs and lower removals
than Option 2, and therefore was not completely costed. The incremental CE ratio is ($l,450)/pe under
Option 2 due to the fact that the technology option results in a cost savings for the modeled facility. EPA has
chosen not to regulate the Rail Petroleum subcategory at this time.
4.6 TRUCK FOOD
All Truck Food facilities in the detailed questionnaire database are indirect dischargers; however,
EPA believes direct dischargers, though rare, do exist in this subcategory. Table 4-9 presents the results of
the CE analysis for direct dischargers, this analysis assumed that direct discharger faculties have the same
characteristics as indirect dischargers; therefore, facility data for indirect dischargers can be used as a proxy
4-8
-------
TABLE 4-6
02
Z
O
•E
0
^^
H
25
OF POLLUTION CONTI
C0
<»
W
z
• .y
SH
H
,U
^
ta
• fc
1^
53
O
u
EMICAL SUBCATEGOR
ECT DISCHARGERS
:HLY MONITORING
Np^ Qg ^^
r^ ^^ Z
Q O
o S S
oc
^TJ
^<
*S
, §
CH
g
- S
Incremental
1 3
C
' ^*
' *-<
'1
^
I
•a
1
jlj
•2
i
'O
1
-
. i.
co
0
O
•4-*
co
O
O
•s
_N
"w
C
Equivalents
OJ
N
^•M
C3
^
CO
w
'3
cr
W
CO
CO
u
C
U
_>
"o
eg
w
CO
CO
u
C
•<-;
1>
w
• '
CO
a
Removed
to
a
•o
u
o
u
^>
^^
60
jg
*g
u
u
H
^_^
w
t^
v«^
oo
ON
^
W
r-H
oo
ON
52-
^_f
oo
ON
§
^,
V^H
bo
1
W
fe
§
o.
O
— <" •— "
_ •
S
3
i:
^o
"o
CO
•3
"^
12
Q
2
r
4-9
-------
S tn > i—<
« ,9 '-a oo
B*IS
g o "1 os
•o
8
~
1
M OO
"
5
:3
•s
8
0 .S
OH 3
CT
e
I
•all
3 5* o
VO
ts
55 S5
ts
§
oo
00
ower r
i
o> ^H cs
c
00
.Se
'•§,'•§,
PQ 0 0
1
I
K
O
4-10
-------
TABLE 4-8
CO
| ..'.
£
.
n3
i>
is
O O S3 O
W g g g
§5 11
2u|o-
J ^ W ft
o?-i
O B p *
* SH ^
55b|
CQ C4 3 H
C/3 Ui P Z
i 5 P o
ld*s •
W
18
8
CO
CO "•?•
u W W
V . ^H K^
.•gpj,ge;
2 W > 'I-!
1 a •« s
< £ g
W ^
. - CO
3 s sr
g j, § es
c o .c Iw!
§all
w ^
"«3
I
1
1
^N
1
H
Vi-=
3 ^ to eo
HH g v.^
.
•gll-
§ 1 & «
o .s S fe
ft 3 § °
O" t^
W
Pre-tax
Annualized
Cost
($1981)
•§!l~
l.sig
OH 3 53 <**^
W >vt
W
^ g
Jl
1o
H
gos^
"*.
55
• s.^-
gg cT
^
g
•< O j^
E .:
-
•< 0 g
SS|
• '• -— ^
o y -
o 55 o
.1 _B C
"« • « •«
. ffl 0"^
tN
«4
i
Jg
CO
1
W
bl
_O
"O
§
s
en
8
1
BO
2
d
i
i
u.
2
3 •.
1
CO
O
>>
TR
1
"o,
1
55
O
z
4-11
-------
1
' 1
^
c
O ^*
oo
O «r>
M OO
OO ON
ON'TT"
m r-*
t*~ <-<
•t *'
<<•> rf
<*.
o
O >n
cs o
ON" ^
**i °°.
r_f\ ^£±
O vo
O O
ON
O"
.lc-2
lit
moo
4-12
-------
for direct dischargers. In order to represent direct dischargers, the POTW removal factors were deleted from
the calculation of pound equivalents removed. There are two technology options for direct dischargers in the
Truck Food subcategory (see Table 3-1). The incremental CE ratio ranges from $81/pe under Option 2 to
$6,233,033/pe under Option 1. EPA has chosen not to set BAT standards for direct dischargers in the Truck
Food subcategory at this time.
Table 4-10 presents the results of the CE analysis for the indirect dischargers. There are two
technology options for indirect dischargers; in the Food Grade subcategory (see Table 3-1). The incremental
CE ratio ranges from $610/pe under Option 2 to $30,588,400/pe under Option 1. EPA has chosen not to
regulate indirect dischargers in the Truck Food subcategory at this time.
4.7 RAIL FOOD
All Rail Food facilities in the detailed questionnaire database are indirect dischargers; however, EPA
believes direct dischargers, though rare, do exist in this subcategory. Table 4-11 presents the results of the
CE analysis for direct dischargers. This analysis assumed that direct discharger facilities have the same
characteristics as indirect dischargers; therefore, facility data for indirect dischargers can be used as a proxy
for direct dischargers. In order to represent direct dischargers, the POTW removal factors were deleted from
the calculation of pound equivalents removed. There are two technology options for direct dischargers in the
Rail Food subcategory (see Table 3-1). The incremental CE ratio is undefined under Option 1 since this
option results in no incremental pollutant removals. The incremental CE under Option 2 is $234/pe. EPA
has chosen not to set BAT standards for direct dischargers in the Rail Food subcategory at this time.
Table 4-12 presents the results of the CE analysis for the indirect dischargers. There are two
technology options for indirect dischargers in the Food Grade subcategory (see Table 3-1). The incremental
CE ratio is undefined under Option 1 since; this option results in no incremental pollutant removals. The.
incremental CE under Option 2 is $l,766/pe. EPA has chosen not to regulate'indirect dischargers in the Rail -
Food subcategory at this time. .
4-13
-------
U
.
00
j2
"o
1
u
H
ST
oo
ON
oo
ON
ST
B
I
V-H
oo
ON
f«4
&^
ST
&
c
.2
5
00
o"
Tt OO
oo^ ON^
oo *£
en
*> ^ i
r~
0 co
m r~-
o «—i
p ^H in
o o" o
.5 C C
"522
en '•£ 'Z>
« (S'O'
4-14
-------
'
TABLE 4-11
t/2
O
g
o
NTROL
.O
U
55
>S OF POLLUTIO
^j
z
S
H
U
U
1
H
02
O
1
o
FOOD SUBCATE
d
S
2
M
IECT DISCHARG
»
3
D
00
2
CO
>;
**<
. * «
>
t ^ ,
' ' • j5
o
1 "
o
MONIT<
>
*
MONTHLYAVEE
O
O
&j
z
3
o.
u
c
C3
§
C
\
13
"g
H
o
1— 1
C3
J
13
•4— »
O
H
i
s
CL,
1
1
£
?
§
Qj
,
CO
CO
ID
i ^
.4_> 4>
CO >
O -.3
u 8
Ss
w
CO
CO
u
1 c
*1> u
CO >
o -5
O o
w
!•«
1 ^
^
Equivalents
Removed
•a
.§«-
•— CO
S o
| U
^
1^9
S.-s
13 £
•S:. S
3 S
8*
&
^o
' *o
.1
'- H
». Z m
W1
^
oo
ON
*"• !
V V i j
^ ' 1
1 i • • i-
V3
^^
oo
ON
^
oo
ON
I
ob
ON
m
a.
c
o
i
^f1 Tf ' '
S * co i
A< CN ;
vj i
.*i§
sii
'gg'g
'
o P pi
f^i j^^ ^y^
0) ^ CS
.Sec
*^T? O ^5 *
CO *•*— * *•*-»
,5 £• ,&•
OQ O O
co
1
_2
10 incremental pollu
»
§
g
^S
^
CO
8
-Q
1
to.
3
c
^
CO
co
co
g
1
0)
O
U.
. ..'.'.:*
^
1
1
<*H
O
0
business
o'
"^
o
T3
0
"o
i
§"
4-15
-------
ijl
III 1
Tf\
y*
'ff^
2
o
^•f
j
o
•B
TABLE 4-12
OF POLLUTION CON
OOD SUBCATEGORY
ECT DISCHARGERS
ULY MONITORING
wa fe eg g
w d p o
P 3 S S
5
SJ
rV
W
§
c/l
55 fi}
M i g SH
2 to > t— c
« o -£j oo
c/l ^
S U [I]
e , G SH
53 J» 4} ^
§CO ^fr ^"1
0 -^ 00
JUIS
S §~
Incremental
e
1
-Q
B ^ to 00
69 O ON
t, 2 {j ~*
-ll^
§1 1?
fii|
•o
S .S *» ^
S ^ t/3 OO
CW S j^*.
^2
^^
-ll^
Illg
-JM
^ e
^ -5
J a
1°
H
S * CN
^ 00
fN*
v»
•< VO
j2? » \o
§Q
^
«,
° O O
o 2 2
« ^ ts
.See
13 .9 .2
a S.K
« O O
at
| '
i_
*j
3
Q,
1
Ui
J
o
e
Q>
*.£
O v^M
4> *rt
*.l
U -o
a 'H
c8 e
§ S
is undefined b
lue to business
M "O
(S *p
SO)
> J
"43 O
T3 tc«
SM ^O
P
U Q
* 55
4-16
-------
4.8 BARGEFOOD
All Barge Food facilities in the detailed questionnaire database are indirect dischargers; however,
EPA believes direct dischargers, though rare, do exist in this subcategory. Table 4-13 presents the results of
the GE analysis for direct dischargers. This analysis assumed that direct discharger facilities have the same
characteristics as indirect dischargers; therefore, facility data for indirect dischargers can be used as a proxy
for direct dischargers. In order to represent direct dischargers, the POTW removal factors were deleted from
the calculation of pound equivalents removed. There are two technology options for direct dischargers in the
Barge Food subcategory (see Table 3-1). The incremental CE ratio is undefined under Option 1 since this
option results in no incremental pollutant removals. The incremental CE under Option 2 is $13 8/pe. EPA
has chosen not to set BAT standards for direct dischargers in the Barge Food subcategory at this time.
Table 4-14 presents the results of the CE analysis for the indirect dischargers. There are two
technology options for indirect dischargers in the Food Grade subcategory (see Table 3-1). Because the
modeled facility has sufficient treatment in place, no incremental pollutant removals exist under Option 1;
therefore the CE for Option 1 is undefined. The incremental CE under Option 2 is $l,721/pe. EPA has
chosen not to regulate indirect dischargers in the Barge Food subcategory at this time.
4.9 TRUCKHOPPER
! • . •
All Truck Hopper facilities in the detailed questionnaire database are indirect dischargers; Table
4-15 presents the results of the CE analysis for the indirect dischargers. There is one technology option for
indirect dischargers in the Hopper subcategory (see Table 3-1). The incremental CE ratio is $183,823/pe
t
under Option 1. EPA has chosen not to regulate the Truck Hopper subcategory at this time.
4.10 RAIL HOPPER
All Rail Hopper facilities in the detailed questionnaire database are indirect dischargers. Table 4-16
presents the results of the CE analysis for the indirect dischargers. There is one technology option for indirect
dischargers in the Hopper subcategory (see Table 3-1). Because the modeled facility has sufficient treatment
4-17
-------
TABLE 4-13
CO
2
E
O
5S OF POLLUTION CONTRO
vrj
w
6
w
fa
1
8
S FOOD SUBCATEGORY
^•^
i
CQ
UECT DISCHARGERS
M
5
• CJ
^
( " :
O
z
o
s
MONTHLYAVEEKLY MONI
S
Z
O
H
Z
S
8
f"
a
P-J
S *i>
SCO
« 0
S u
•S
Incremental
3
J
1
H
Pre-tax
Annualized
Pound
Equivalents
|
"*7* cd
^ •<
CO
T3 ^S
|.|
w
CO
<3
>
•^^
ts
^a
w
CO
s
G
(D
H
w
ts
o
o
Removed
to
O
O
H"l
£o
^j
Q
^
H
. '• :";: :«T* c 1"
g
^
oo
2 ^f
<*> |
2!
&^:
w"
^ .
<— 1
oo
52-
r— 1
OO
Os
PQ
oo
i—t
^^
w
fe
o
i
•:.'. ••. |
-------
TABLE 4-14
02
Z
O
p
PH
0
J
o
•*
OF POLLUTION CONT
03
03
w
w
^
B
a
6^
rvi
•3
O3
O
u
^OOD SUBCATEGORY
M*
w
o
Sj
CQ
iCT DISCHARGERS
S
M*4
NN
A
0
l_l
0
_>
^1
1
HLY MONITORING
H
Z'
O
•
r*
' §
J3
Incremental
."3
^M
j|
- |
^
\
^
"1
p-i
T3
O
PH
• x
03
2
PH
1
O
PH
"co
O
U
,'
S
•o
0
M
Annuali;
Equivalents
u
^3
cS
^*^<
42
,g
-•a
>
'3
cr
W
g? ^-J Z —1
•3 oo
0 O\
-. '.
j*H- 6^1 I
w M . . .
0) -H CN "S
.Sec
13 22
co '-S -3
cQ Cl* C^
CQ O P
CO
,
.2
1
T3
U3
C
8
e
1
o
"*^
15
D
"8
v
CO
O
1
•3
1
•
@"
4-19
-------
12
CO
§
E
o
o
iS
>S OF POLLUTION COI
HOPPER SUBCATEGO
IRECT DISCHARGERS
CTIVENEJ
TRUCK
INDl
1
CO
O
U
i
• u
&£
rrt
j^
0
i "***
i" • "
i
11 i
•" •" J§
"c
1
g
1— 1
i
\
i
i
I
^THLY MONITORING
Incremental
O
S
f
13
3
H
r
i
£
•o
1
_x 1-7 ^ ^
w , ^ oo
O rf) i ff^
. G OL,' 00
•J-t w ^ • 1— 1
«">>—<" «i
O -J3 OO
U 8 2'
«H rr;
M— I ^J
w ^
;
en
en ^^
i OH
"55 > ~H
0 -J3 00
O o ON
5a &S
**"* y-L
PQ ^^^
"S
J3 In 00
CO Q O\
g 0^;
Equivalents
Removed
(PE)
u1-»
•2 '-3 "55 oo
„', 9 O ON
(£ 1 ° 5»
1
0
OH
''i;
:
n
S 1 ^-s
*« 0 CU
.s! S fc,
=3 S ^
CT" p5
_0 C
"o .2
P
H
<* co
S «N
(«C OO^
co"
oo
°*
S co
»Zi r^
t-
-------
TABLE 4-16
1
2 ^
E
O-
• j •
o
ig
slag-
OF POLLUTION <
PPERSUBCATEC
ECT DISCHARGE
HLYMONITORII
oa O g.C
•50 g P Z
§i
i
«
• H
C»
8 • ,
S i5^
«) j, g 5;
§ O -~ oo
^"ll
. OT
•"•3 c/j. >^*«.
g fl> fTl
§ ^'S'g
: | o -^ oo
o {§ JS
S pj ^
-=s
Incrementa
1
- ,S
_
o
H
. T3
-S 43 w <»
• j, S3 o <7\
£|°S
<
Pound
Equivalents
Removed
(PE)
B!~-
£ | 3 |
•8*1^
lll.fi
<^od
w
fe !
o e
"3--S
IS
H
^*
s *: •
§•
,
18
< e
•» g-
0 Q
o z
c
IS o
S Q<
« O
i %
•a °«
fl V3
sS °^
|S
g"
4-21
-------
in place, no incremental pollutant removals exist under Option 1; therefore, the CE for Option 1 is undefined.
EPA has chosen not to regulate indirect dischargers in the Rail Hopper subcategory at this time.
4.11 BARGE HOPPER
The Barge Hopper subcategory includes both direct and indirect dischargers. Table 4-17 presents
the results of the CE analysis for the direct dischargers. There is one technology option for direct dischargers
in the Hopper subcategory (see Table 3-1). The incremental CE ratio is $27,674/pe under Option 1. EPA
has chosen not to regulate direct dischargers in the Barge Hopper subcategory at this time.
Table 4-18 presents the results of the CE analysis for the indirect dischargers. There is one
technology option for indirect dischargers in this subcategory (see Table 3-1). The incremental CE ratio is
$165,190/pc under Option 1. EPA has chosen not to regulate indirect dischargers in the Barge Hopper
subcategory at this time.
4-22
-------
TABLE 4-17
t»
Z
O
• *-<
K
o
l_3
o
ON CONTR
5SOFPOLLUTI
w.
w
H
u-
fa
fa
'•S
t/J
o
'"
ATEGORY
GERS
3RING
HOPPER SUBC
IECT DISCHAR
miLY MONIT<
H B O
a «'g •
Ci
«
•• ' ••
3
g
2
- Jj
. =3'
J
13
S
bO
s
. <
.3
c
o
I
Jj
HH
eS
H
I
- OH
I
T3
O
OH
CO
O
o
00
c3
-a
Annualize
Equivalents
"^
N
'•a
3
'3
cr.
|w
CJ ^^
•^ oo
O Cf\
(P «— '
W ^
CO ^~>
u tij
C Oj
O ^
•J3 «3
0 ON
m ^
,
•*j ^^
w OO
O ON
u -
1~
o W
^_^
to 00
O O\
U £
"O
CH r~^
D *""'
o° e
•— O
o •«
15
H
^^ *****
^^ r^**
; . ^
;
r-"
cs
'
(N
o -r-
o ^
s «
.— c
vT? O
QJ •£
co "-S
CO QH
PQ O,
4-23
-------
op
•4-
1
co
z
o
1— 1
H
cu
O
J
O
^
£
ESS OF POLLUTION COP
z
63
><^
g
w
S
S
u
J^
S
E HOPPER SUBCATEGO]
C^
^"*|3
M
DIRECT DISCHARGERS
2
(•N
(D '-'
ff* i *'
2 CO
So
•$ ^
ONTHLY MONITORING
5!
^— '
»
,!!!
U -i
g U
(— «
t— (
Incremental
"es
Z3
1
•a
•§ "3
M
Pound
Equivalents
•o
B
(U
>
U
W
CO
1
>
• ^4
•*-*
f j"^
rjl
CO
°
Removed
o
U
•o
o
S
S
Pi
§B
o
1
8
H
J S'S'
W~ >n"
ti^ i
^""^ ro
OO
ONI
vS-'
i
j ..
|
t— (
CO
ON
^^
S— ^
^
OO
X— '
W
^
^_^
oo
ON
^-^
ST
OH
^•^
§
•4-^
ct
g
r^
-
<; ON
jz; In
vo"
^
^^ ^^
•< ON
^'in
»*
^^
S
o *-<
C5 CJ
U <— i
J C
13 -^
m o*
4-24
-------
SECTIONS
COMPARISON OF COST-EFFECTIVENESS VALUES WITH
PROMULGATED RULES
In addition to subcategory-specific cost-effectiveness ratios, this analysis also includes cost-
effectiveness ratios for BAT and PSES for the TEC industry as a wiiole. EPA calculates the cost-
effectiveness ratio for the entire industry using two factors: the incremental annualized cost and incremental
removals for the proposed options for each subcategory. The incremental values are totaled to provide the
cost-effectiveness ratio for the industry. The proposed options are:
• Truck Chemical: Option 2 for both direct and indirect dischargers
• Rail Chemical: Option 1 for both direct and indirect dischargers
• Barge Chemical and Petroleum: Option 1 for direct dischargers (Indirect dischargers are not
regulated at this time.)
• Truck Petroleum: not regulated at this time
• Rail Petroleum: not regulated at this time
• TruckFood: not regulated at this time'4
• Rail Food: not regulated at this time4
, • Barge Food: not regulated at this time4 •
• Truck Hopper: not regulated at this time
• Rail Hopper: not regulated at this time
'• Barge Hopper: not regulated at this time
Tables 5-1 and 5-2 illustrate the process for calculating the industry cost-effectiveness for BAT and PSES,
respectively.
4 At mis time EPA is proposing BPT and BCT, but not BAT for the Food subcategories.
5-1
-------
TABLE 5-1
INCREMENTAL COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF POLLUTANT CONTROL OPTIONS
TRANSPORTATION EQUIPMENT CLEANING INDUSTRY
DIRECT DISCHARGERS
Incremental
.
if!
Subcategory
Truck Chemical
Rail Chemical
Barge
Truck
Chemical
Petroleum
Rail Petroleum
Truck Food
Rail Food
Barge
Truck
Food
Hopper
Rail Hopper
Barge Hopper
•' : ; . : Pre-tax
Annualiized Cost
($f981)
ND
ND
$1,437,712
NA
NA
NA .
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
PE Cost-Effectiveness
Removed ($/PE)
ND
ND
13,856.1
'NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
$602
$84
$104
• NA
NA
NA.
NA
NA
- NA
NA
NA
Industry Total
$1,549,180
14,399.2
$108
ND: Not disclosed due to business confidentiality.
NA: Not applicable.
Note: Incremental costs and removals are calculated from the selected option and preceding
option in the subcategory cost-effectiveness analysis.
5-2
-------
TABLE 5-2
INCREMENTAL COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF POLLUTANT CONTROL OPTIONS
TRANSPORTATION EQUIPMENT CLEANING INDUSTRY
INDIRECT DISCHARGERS
"
Subcategory
Truck Chemical
Rail Chemical ,
Barge Chemical
Truck Petroleum
Rail Petroleum
Truck Food
Rail Food
Barge Food
Truck Hopper
Rail Hopper
Barge Hopper
Pre-tax
Annualized Cost
($1981)
$6,712,559
$1,173,145
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Incremental
PE
Removed
21,691.1
20,825.6
; NA
NA
NA
.•' NA
NA
NA
. NA
• NA
NA
"-*
Cost-Effectiveness
($/PE)..
$309
$56
NA
- NA
1 '- • , NA
NA
NA
. NA
NA
NA
NA
Industry Total
$7,928,221
42,882.5
$185
Note: Incremental costs and removals are calculated from the selected option and preceding
option in the subcategory cost-effectiveness analysis.
5-3
-------
Table 5-1 presents the incremental cost-effectiveness of proposed pollution control options for direct
. i ' ' ''' . , .1 „ ' i . „: „ ', ,
dischargers in the TEC industry. The incremental cost-effectiveness resulting from the proposed options for
direct dischargers in the Truck Chemical, Rail Chemical, and Barge Chemical and Petroleum subcategories is
$108/pe.
Table 5-2 presents the incremental cost-effectiveness of proposed pollution control options for
indirect dischargers in the TEC industry. The incremental industry cost-effectiveness resulting from the
proposed options for indirect dischargers in the Truck Chemical and Rail Chemical subcategories is $185/pe.
Tables 5-3 and 5-4 present the cost-effectiveness values for effluent limitations guidelines and
standards in other industries for direct dischargers under BAT and indirect dischargers under PSES. The
numbers presented for this rulemaking are pre-tax costs, whereas many of the numbers presented for other
effluent guidelines are post-tax costs—that is, the actual costs faced by the firms, not just the total cost of the
.• ' :''! - i: • • ',•• •"••:• :"' • • <•',••. ";, • ...
equipment (which is subsidized by reductions in taxable income). Thus, direct comparisons between this
rulemaking and others cannot be made easily. An equivalent post-tax cost-effectiveness, however, is
approximately 60 to 70 percent of pre-tax cost-effectiveness. Appendix B contains the supporting
i ' ' , ,!•<*' , , ' '• ' , , ' :• ' ' ' ' i
information for baseline discharges.
5-4
-------
TABLE 5-3
INDUSTRY COMPARISON OF BAT COST-EFFECTIVENESS
FOR DIRECT DISCHARGERS
(Toxic and Nonconventional Pollutants Only; Copper-Based Weights*; $ 1981)
Industry
Aluminum Forming
Battery Manufacturing
Canmaking
Centralized Waste Treatment1
Coal Mining
Coil Coating
Copper Forming
Electronics I •
Electronics II
Foundries
Inorganic Chemicals I
Inorganic Chemicals II
Iron & Steel
Leather Tanning
Metal Finishing
Metal Products and Machinery1
Nonferrous Metals Forming
Nonferrous Metals Mfg I _
Nonferrous Metals Mfg II
Oil and Gas: Offshore"
Coastal— Produced Water/TWC
Drilling Waste
Organic Chemicals
Pesticides
Pharmaceuticals1 A/C
B/D
Plastics Molding & Forming
Porcelain Enameling
Petroleum Refining
Pulp & Paper1
Textile Mills
Transportation Equipment
Cleaning1
PE Currently Discharged
(thousands)
1,340
. 4,126
12
' . . 3,372
BAT=BPT
2,289
70
.9
NA
2,308
32,503
605
40,746
259
3,305 .
140
34
6,653
-- . .. 1,004
3,809
951
BAT = Current Practice
54,225
2,461
897
90
44 •
l',086
BAT=BPT
61,713
BAT=BPT
15
PE Remaining at Selected
Option
(thousands)
90
5
0.2
1,261-1,267
BAT=BPT
9
8
3
NA.
39
1,290
• 27
1,040
112
3,268
70
2
313
12
2,328
239
BAT = Current Practice
9,735
371
47
0.5
41
63
BAT=BPT
2,628
BAT=BPT
0.8
Cost-Effectiveness of
Selected Option(s)
($/PE removed)
121
2
10
' ' 5-7
BAT=BPT
49
27
404
NA
84
<1
6
2 -.
BAT=BPT
12
50
69
4
6
33
35
BAT - Current Practice
- • . 5
• ' .14
47
96
BAT=BPT
,6
BAT=BPT
39
BAT=BPT
108
'Although toxic weighting factors for priority pollutants varied across these rules, this table reflects the cost-effectiveness at the tune of
regulation. ,
'Produced water only; for produced sand and drilling fluids and drill cuttings, BAT=NSPS.
"Proposed.
5-5
-------
TABLE 5-4
INDUSTRY COMPARISON OF PSES COST-EFFECTIVENESS
FOR INDIRECT DISCHARGERS
(Toxic and Nonconventional Pollutants Only; Copper-Based Weights*; $ 1981)
Industry*
Aluminum Forming
Battery Manufacturing
Canmaking
Centralized Waste Treatment1
Coal Mining
Coil Coating
Copper Forming
Electronics I
Electronics II
Foundries
Inorganic Chemicals I
Inorganic Chemicals II
Iron & Steel
Leather Tanning
Metal Finishing
Metal Products and Machinery0
Nonferrous Metals Forming
Nonferrous Metals Mfg I
Nonferrous Metals Mfg II
Organic Chemicals
Pesticide Manufacturing
Pesticide Formulating
Pharmaceuticals'
Plastics Molding & Forming
Porcelain Enameling
Pulp & Paper1
Transportation Equipment Cleaning
PE Currently Discharged
(To Surface Waters)
(thousands)
1,602
1,152
252
689
NA
2,503
934
75
260
2,136
3,971
4,760
5,599
16,830
11,680
1,115
189
3,187
38
5,210
257
7,746
340
NA
1,565
9,539
426
PE Discharged at Selected
Option (To Surface
Waters)
(thousands)
18
5
5
328-330
NA
10
4
35
24
18
3,004
6
1,404
1,899
755
234
5
19
0.41
72
19
112
63
NA
96
103
383
Cost-Effectiveness of
Selected Option(s)
Beyond BPT
($/PE removed)
155
15
38
70-110
NAC
10
10
14
14
116
9
<1
6
111
10
127
90
15
12
34
18
<3
1
NA
14
65
185
•Although toxic weighting factors for priority pollutants varied across these rules, this table reflects the cost-effectiveness at the time of
regulation,
'No known indirect dischargers at this time for offshore oil and gas and coastal oil and gas.
'Proposed.
5-6
""'II
•I .ii!f ii
-------
SECTION 6
COST-REASONABLENESS OF
CONVENTIONAL POLLUTANTS REMOVED
6.1 BCT COST-REASONABLENESS TEST
EPA evaluates the cost-reasonableness of control technologies for conventional pollutants for direct
dischargers using the Best Conventional Pollutant Control Technology (BCT) cost test. After setting Best
Practicable Control Technology (BPT), EPA uses the BCT cost test to evaluate whether it can set BCT at a
more stringent level. The test evaluates the cost-reasonableness of BCT options compared to BPT options.
Like BPT, BCT applies only to direct dischargers.
The test is composed of two parts, the POTW test and the industry cost-effectiveness test A
pollution control technology must pass both parts in order to pass the test. If it does not pass, then BCT
limitations are set at a level equal to BPT limitations. This is also done if there are no candidate technologies
for BCT at a more stringent level than BPT. In the latter case, the BCT cost test is not performed
6.1.1 POTWTest
The POTW test compares the incremental cost of removals incurred by switching from BPT to BCT
against the cost of upgrading POTWs from secondary to advanced secondary treatment In order to pass this
test, the incremental cost for the TEC industry to comply with BCT (measured in dollars per pound of
conventional pollutants removed) must be less than the cost of upgrading POTWs to achieve similar
removals. This benchmark cost for POTWs is set at $0.56 in 1994 dollars. Cost per pound of conventional
pollutant removals is calculated as:
Cost per Pound = Pre Tax AnnuaUzed Cost / Pounds Removed
To pass this part of the test, the TEC industry cost per pound removed must be less than $0.56.
6-1
-------
6.1.2 Industry Ratio Test
The industry cost-effectiveness test compares the rate of cost increase for an industry to move from
BPT to BCT to the rate of cost increase for POTWs to upgrade from secondary to advanced secondary
treatment. To pass this test, the rate of cost increase for the industry must be less than the rate of cost
increase associated with upgrading POTWs. This rate is benchmarked at 1.29. In effect, this part of the test
requires that the cost of removals must increase by less than 29% in moving from BPT to BCT. The industry
cost-effectiveness is calculated as the ratio of the incremental cost of BCT to the incremental cost of BPT
(which is incremental from the baseline level of treatment):
Industry Cost-Effectiveness = BCT Incremental Cost per Pound / BPT Incremental Cost per Pound
62 SUBCATEGORY BCT TESTS
The following seven tables present the cost-reasonableness of BCT options by subcategory for the
TEC industry effluent guidelines. All costs are presented in 1994 dollars. Each table presents figures based
on a combination of monthly and weekly monitoring.
For three subcategories—Truck Food, Rail Food, and Barge Food—all facilities in the detailed
'" >r"! " . "' • "! ' ' .•'; . • .' "••• •':•'. ;; ',:: ; '
questionnaire database are indirect dischargers; however, EPA believes direct dischargers, though rare, do
exist in these subcategories, and identified several direct dischargers in the screener questionnaire database.
This analysis assumes that direct discharger facilities in these subcategories have the same characteristics as
the indirect dischargers in the detailed questionnaire database; therefore, facility data for indirect dischargers
can be used as a proxy for direct dischargers. To accurately represent direct dischargers in calculating pounds
: ,,:! , -• - ; ', V ••'.. , :•'.' .• ' •' • •', '"••'• • ' '''•• '•'•
removed, the POTW removal factors were deleted.
. ' ^
For two subcategories—Truck Chemical and Rail Chemical—all facilities in the detailed
questionnaire database are indirect dischargers; nonetheless, direct dischargers were identified in the screener
questionnaire database. EPA performed this analysis on the facilities identified from the screener survey.
6-2
-------
6.2.1 TruckFood
Table 6-1 presents the results of the BCT cost test for direct dischargers in the Truck Food
subcategory. Two technology options for direct dischargers exist in this subcategory (see Table 3-1). The
cost per pound ranges from $0.0006 under Option 2 to $0.0799 under Option 1. The incremental cost per -
pound is $0.0003 under Option 2. The BCT test was not performed for this subcategory because EPA chose
Option 2 for the candidate BPT, and there are no more stringent candidate technologies for BCT. EPA has
set Option 2 for BPT and BCT for this subcategory.
6.2.2 Rail Food
Table 6-2 presents the results of the BCT cost test for direct dischargers in the Rail Food
subcategory. Two technology options for direct dischargers exist in this subcategory (see Table 3-1). The
cost per pound ranges from $0.13 under Option 2 to $32,539.92 under Option 1. The incremental cost per
pound is $0.07 under Option 2. The BCT test was not performed for this subcategory because EPA chose
Option 2 for the candidate BPT, and there are no more stringent candidate technologies for BCT. EPA has
set Option 2 for BPT and BCT for this subcategory.
6.2.3 Barge Food
Table 6-3 presents the results of the BCT cost test for direct dischargers in the Barge Food
subcategory. Two technology options for direct dischargers exist in this subcategory (see Table 3-1). The
cost per pound is undefined under Option 1 because no pounds of conventional pollutants were removed, and
is $0.003 under Option 2. The incremental cost per pound is $0.001 under Option 2. The BCT test was not
performed for this subcategory because EPA chose Option 2 for the candidate BPT, and there are no more
stringent candidate technologies for BCT. EPA has set Option 2 for BPT and BCT for this subcategory.
6-3
-------
o ^
U
CQ
3
3
3
^gg^
ST
£2^1
ea
w
i
cremental
jj
'S-eS"
P. c ON
•^^ 3 O\
o <£ M
U *• S
Pounds
Removed
ill
i 3 ^
£ g «
<6
[
i
CQ
3
C
C
<
1 ~a
pO
*"'
^ T3 -q-
P- e o\
•" 3 OS
V? O ~—
c3°-^
T3
c i5
O g
Pi
T3 ?"
cQ ^2 »— ^
l||
^
o c
V
o\ (*"i
o\ o
p- o
O 0
0 O
^C *"!
cT t-^
oo oo
p~ r~
tN
rr oo
**\. ^i
C") O\
r-, CM_
tn vcT
o\ o
!*••• CD
O O
o o
Tf O\
r^- -*• «
^ oo
o" r-"
oo xo
fl ft
t^ 5
*>
C**4
m o
m vo
— " VO*
«X" ts"
— (S
II
.
c
o
cu
o.
1
"3
§
1
u
c
E
§
g;
3
£
1
1 %
« S
2 v
C -n
JU ^
E 3
£_• P O
rb a, c3\
i! e t. ts
2Q Jg 5
II H f-w
»vj O w »
.1? 51
*- *- ^5 ID
/^" i> "c ^
o f_ c •«-
1 w 1 £
A M -X-* U PJ
lliif
.y W *^ w
"S. "^ rj ^ -3
§-c3« S.S
|f|S®
<1 i
6-4
-------
-
TABLE 6-2
H
1
• -1
2
^
2
2
z.
Ed
>
O
u
ND BCT COST TEST FOR
<
c^
Ed
Ed
&
Ed
St.
.b
COST-E
g
Q
RAIL FOOD SUBCATEG
»3
£
DIRECT DISCHARGE!
'
.
.
U
Z
2
g ;
z
i'
^
TION MONTHLYAVEEKL
<
^
BQ
1
U
^
1
u
o
°e3
3
C
j3
I
o
' U
ca
us
CO
-^ I)
C , c
ws to >
•a- ° '•C
»^
•*-* 3
CO Q
• o ^
CO
T3
Q
°"
istper Pre-tax
ound Annualized
. ,<3fc
(A
"O
c
3
Q
Pre-tax
Annualized
1
"o
1
•*-*
C/3
#
s
o\
&O-
1
fc
0
(S
Cost ($1994)
§
I
Z
• . - ^
Z
M r~-
ON O
OS C>
>o
cs"
fl
• , .*!*
Q Q -
' Z Z
ii;
ts m
o\ o
fi &e
v^
sf
V*
' Q Q .
Z Z ,
Q Q
Z Z
c: c
o o .
SJ
'•i
6:1
03-0
jcause Option 2 - '.
e to business confi
*f
3 ^
cd u
O O
11
11
< Q
Z Z
r^ ' i
\
•0
§
1 .
a.
Pound/BPT Incremental Cost
fc '-
CL.
% &
O o
3 v
1" §
C
•J-! C^ ^f
O "££ OS
i ° &
cSffl «_
to i
•§ i
» H
«
t-Effectiveness < 1
5®
^
£
^
0-5
-------
a
TABLE 6-3
"
' ! £• , 8
G *lt U *•*
" -3 w ^ <8
•o r^ f— •
12
CD
1
H
1
0
CL,
I I
i §
Pd 5
T COST TEST FOR CONV
E FOOD SUBCATEGORY
RECT DISCHARGERS
V10NTHLYAVEEKLY MOi
5 3 Q z
<(? ^5
|« g
8 2
W O
w
1
8
1
u
y
*™
il Annual
^
S-a^
°? S °^
*^ S3 O\
ll
§ i
Pre-tax
Annualized Po
Cost ($1994) Ren
>-• X—
•> *o n-
o. c o\
*S 3 O\
S o —
0 ^S
CO fl>
ll
x "^ «
g | t2
« S *-
DH g CO
.2 B
II
H
o
C)
O O
OO
00
o_
oC
OS
m
•*,
" cT
o o
OO
00
O
cC
pollutant removals.
&
g.
to
6
•3
Inc
al p
PT
a l
§ <£
s
O Q^
H *r
O m
a
s g
4J C
S H "
S cu °
T3 CQ £
C I! H
IS
O. g g « ^ *L
S -0 -S H TT rq
^3^12^.
8 •§ w P ?* «
3 O
f
6-6
-------
6.2.4 Truck Chemical
Table 6-4 presents the results of tlie BCT cost test for direct dischargers in the Truck Chemical
subcategory. Two technology options for direct dischargers exist in this subcategory (see Table 3-1). Costs
and removals were not calculated for Option 1. The cost per pound is $0.48 under Option 2. The BCT test
was not performed for this subcategory because EPA chose Option! for the candidate BPT, and there are no
more stringent candidate technologies for BCT. EPA has set Option 2 for BPT and BCT for this
subcategory.
6.2.5 Rail Chemical
Table 6-5 presents the results of tiie BCT cost test for direct dischargers in the Rail Chemical
subcategory. Three technology options for direct dischargers exist in this subcategory (see Table 3-1). The
cost per pound ranges from $35.55 under Option 2 to $96.87 under Option 1. The incremental cost per
pound is $20.66 under Option 2 and $27.81 under Option 3. The industry cost-effectiveness ratio ranges
from 0.21 with Option 1 as BPT and Option 2 as BCT to 0.29 with Option 1 as BPT and Option 3 as BCT.
Both Option 2 and Option 3 fail the POTW test and, consequently, fail the BCT cost test EPA has set
Option 1 for BPT and BCT for this subcategory.
6.2.6 Barge Chemical and Petroleum
Table 6-6 presents the results of the BCT cost test for direct dischargers in the Barge Chemical and
Petroleum subcategory. Two technology options for direct dischargers exist in this subcategory (see Table
3-1). The cost per pound ranges from $0.35 under Option 1 to $0.39 under Option 2. The incremental cost
per pound is $1.64 under Option 2. The industry cost-effectiveness ratio is 4:73 with Option 1 as BPT and
Option 2 as BCT. Option 2 fails the BCT cost test; it passes neither the POTW test nor the industry cost-
effectiveness test EPA has set Option 1 for BPT and BCT for this subcategory.
6-7
-------
3
S
^•^
£
4-*
CO
O
U M
0 ^
CQ
, -fa *L o *-•
M t5 > «!
,
1
g
I
-------
TABLE 6-5
S
1
, J
o
•^
• z
o
^
2n
r ^
1 COST TEST FOR (
z
^
CO
CO
Ed
Z
Ed
P
- ^T
Ed
fa
Ed
i
u
>
PH
O
r.i.1
[EMICAL SUBCATI
FW
NH
J
2
ff
2
JECTDISCHARGEF
BS
C
-t-*
S
o
• m
CO
! .' ;^_ S
- . . . j - £ j, S
• ' '3 0 'S
O
NITORIIN
S
•^
[ONTHLYAVEEKL1
g
M
H
•<
:OMBIN
^^
w
u
S
u
^
S^,
Pu c3
*•• =3
o ^
CO
•o
(2
Pre-tax
Annualized
3
^
2
H
,
b'-o
o. a
•fe* ^
r\ &*
-1
o
&*
13
II
&* S
^
^
00
- . _O
a
is
.H
•4-t
C/]
-t-*
y-
f-1
^
ON
^
T3
i
u
DH
Cost ($1994)
o\
<-H
^S-
•o
0
S
^>
^
^
S
4-1
0
1
S
m Is
b b •.
-. • , .
--< o\
..
'
. CS CN
• . ' o . o , !
^ " •
r** vo •• p^ i— <
oq vo oo oo
ON cs ov CN
Q O O O
Q Q Q Q '
Z Z Z Z
oo */*> oo' in
vo *o vo o
^ 2? S S
§a Q. Q '
Z Z Z
Q Q D Q
Z Z .Z Z
' •
^•^ ^Nl v^ »^^
e a a e •
00 00
'&'$ IS
•§-
§
cu
. 4>
a,
' , tn
d/BPT Incremental Cr
e
3
'£
a.
CO
. O
t|
•~ u •
c o
TJ J3
*i u
o CQ
B JL
.s s
_O CO
-° ™
2 • g ii
(11 fli *"
3 ,> £_<
"§•*-•
^3 flj .^
"o J* ^"?
(O CO ^J
? 6 ffl
>2 &* CO
ai °
1 ' -
vo
O
6^
V
a .
§
Cw ON
s 2
— V
r9 CO
— e
43 g
S —
S QJ
U t±3
o W
C3 .'.
^•H (o
ON O
H 3
O "2
CTJ ^^
6-9
-------
i,
TABLE6-6
CO
z
&
>-3
fcj
g
1
i
Ed
AND BCT COST TEST FOR CONV
CO
C/3
1
Cc<
&Cl
&y
H*
~2
o
0
S
tARGE CHEMICAL SUBCATEGO!
w
DIRECT DISCHARGERS
•'I -
'!
»•
- ;s
O
z
%
1
^^
z
ATION MONTHLYAVEEKLY MO
lyr
£ij
PQ
8
' , •" O
H
o
CQ
CO
•C ^1* 1>
w
•t
t_l
1
B
§
a
"to
^*
3
o
£
&
0
E-
en
1
^>
OS
OS
s
1
o
i
&
^
OS
OS
»<-4
6O,
en
a
I
a^
5
1
QJ
K
^-N
^f
s
2,
ff
\^
V
£
\
)
.5;
c
OS
C5 C5
OS CO
O rj-
PT" oo"
^*x ^\
VO VO
VO O
f- u~t
•*$: m
os" t-^1
OS VO
rf cs"
a a
O 0
•S -G
&$
|
l.ri
st per Pound/BPT Incremental Cost pe
o
^"^
1
p"5
£
^
n^
W
||
•*•*
t/3
r"
w
i
i
o
s£
2
&
&*
s
'S
£
VO
*o
o
«%
v
1
P-.
u
to
O
rj
^ ... ,
cfl
^si
o3
E
-U 0
CO e
o £
to Gs
u ^
H H
« CO
*G ^^
C3 ^2
o"
>
H
OS
V
CO
cS
c*
o
^
*j3
si
W
Q
£
CO
•li
/^^
'£'
6-10
-------
6.2.7 Barge Hopper
Table 6-7 presents the results of the BCT cost test for direct dischargers in the Barge Hopper
subcategory. One technology option for direct dischargers exists in this subcategory (see Table 3-1). The
cost per pound is $13.57 under Option 1. The BCT test was not performed for this subcategory because EPA
chose Option 1 for the candidate BPT, and there are no more stringent candidate technologies for BCT. EPA
has chosen not to set BPT or BCT for this subcategory.
6-11
-------
TABLE 6-7
,
! 1
• ' .1
t5
6 V
H £
OQ
03
I1 ^* £*
i" i3 • '• 4) •*_>
' M « > S?
CO
H
H
O
6«
_
^ o
25 M
o S
C O
S AND BCT COST TEST FOR CONVEN1
BARGE HOPPER SUBCATEGORY
DIRECT DISCHARGERS
[NATION MONTHLYAVEEKLY MONIT
£ 3
g S
w o
^ u
••H
^
I
' ''• ,
T3 O § H
C ^ o>
" w
Incremental
•jo
Total Annu
&•§£
w 3 2
y P-1 SS
Cost per Pre-tax
Pound Annualized Pounds
($1994) Cost ($1994) Removed
a> u
11
fi|
t3 ^
X .§ ON
i 13 55
JJ 3 v.^
^^ r)
^^
Technology
Option
Z,
^^
z
u-i
M
^^
VO .
cs
oo1
VO
V— 1
VO
oo1
VO
«\
&o
i
o
•o
c
3
1 Cost per Pound/BPT Incremental Cost per P<
$0.56
w v
1 1
Si fg
11 h «v
— CJ g w
e « cj SS
.2 II -. c
•*•» a_* CO (U
?* I!
w w rt UH
3 en JJ 53
a H i; o w
O C eo g i
0> (U U HM ^Q
J3 > f-> _». o
NA: Not applicable
Industry Cost-Effect
Two-part BCT Cost
(a) BCT $199-
(b) Industry C
6-12
-------
SECTION?
REFERENCES
Engineering News Record. 1996. Construction cost index history, 1907-1996. Engineering News Record.
March 25. page 72.
SAIC. 1996. Transportation equipment cleaning industry detailed questionnaire sample design report
(interim draft). Prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water by SAIC. McLean,
Virginia. April 12.
U.S. EPA. 1993, Tank and container interior cleaning screener questionnaire. OMB No. 2040-0166.
Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water.
U.S. EPA. 1995. 1994 Detailed questionnaire for the; transportation equipment cleaning industry. OMB No.
2040-0179. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water. April.
U.S. EPA. 1998a. Economic analysis of proposed effluent limitationsguidelines and standards for the
transportation equipment cleaning industry. EPA-821-B-98-012. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Office of Water. May.
U.S. EPA. 1998b. Development document for the proposed effluent limitations guidelines and standards for
the transportation equipment cleaning industry. EPA-821-B-98-011. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Office of Water. May.
L • . f •
Versar,Inc. 1995. TWF and categorization information for TEC analytes. Prepared for U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Office of Water. February 1995.
7-1
-------
7-2
-------
APPENDIX A
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION FOR
COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS:
POLLUTANT LOADINGS AND POUND EQUIVALENTS REMOVED
A-l
-------
A-2
-------
z •
o .
ft- •'
0
Q
CK]
s
'"•^
en
*
0
Z
Ii
S o
t^
>^r ^rf
^1 C
^^ MN
^ H
I<"3 ^
^j 5i
^j -C3 '
o ^
3 *"
i
z
>
^
o r
u
'Z-
o
^
H
E
o
13
*i
H
£ •
PH
1
13
^
cr
W
"O
c
3
O
09
* w
• - £3
O
PH
,
1
'••3
c
•4-*
.2
Q.
-^-»
', H
t5
0 '7 '75'"
00 CN -^ ^ ^
T^" OO
' —" o"
@9 VD "7 *7
.1^-* |^K ^-" ^-*
°S.
2
§Q ON O O
Z
C K3 03 C rt 03
H & PQ H Pi PQ
VO
0
.NO"
•• o
tN
i - '
1 •-
S 1
r~f ! tn
ON -
-------
TABLE A-2
POLLUTANT REMOVALS
TRUCK CHEMICAL SUBCATEGORY
DIRECT DISCHARGERS
1,
I1 I ' "
Chemical
Acetone
Benzene
Chloroform
1,2-Dichloroethane
Ethylbenzene
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methy! isobutyl ketone
Methylene chloride
Tetrachloroethylene
Toluene
1 , 1 ,1 -Tnchloroethane
Trichloroethylene
m-Xylene
o+p-Xylene
alpha-Terpineol
Benzoic acid
Benzyl alcohol
bis (2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate
2-Chlorpphenol
o-Cresol
p^Crcso]
p-Cymene
n-Decane
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene
Di-n-octyl phthalate
n-Docosane
n-Dodecane
n-Eicosine
n-Hexacosane
n-Hexadecane
2-Isopropylnaphthalene
2-Methylnaphthalene
Naphthalene
n-Octadecane
Styrene
n-Tctracosanc
n-Tetradecane
n-Triacontane
Azinphos ethyl
Azinphos methyl
Coumaphos
Dichlofenthion
Pollutants Removed
(grams)
Option 1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Pound Equivalents
Conversion Factors Removed
i'
Grams/
Pounds
2.21 E-03
2.21E-03
2.21 E-03
2.21 E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03,
2.21E-03
2.21 E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21 E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21 E-03
2.21 E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2^21 E703
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21 E-03
2.21 E-03
2.21 E-03
2.21 E-03
2.21 E-03
2.21 E-03
2.21 E-03
2.21E-03
2.21 E-03
2.21 E-03
2.21 E-03
2.21 E-03
2.21 E-03
2.21 E-03
2.21E-03
Toxic
Weighting
Factor
7.60E-06
1.80E-02
2.10E-03
6.20E-03
1.40E-03
2.20E-05
1.20E-04
4.20E-04
7.40E-02
5.60E-03
4.30E-03
6.30E-02
1.50E-03
8:50E-03
1*OOE-03
3.30E-04
5.60E-03
1.10E-01
3.30E-02
3.30E-03
2.40E-03
4.30E-02
4.30E-03
UOE-02
2.20E-61
8.20E-05
4:30E-03
4.30E-03
8.20E-05
4.30E-03
9.82E-02
L80E-02
1.50E-02
4.30E-03
1.40E-02
8.20E-05
4.30E-03
8.2QE-05
5.10E+03
2.80E+01
5.60E+03
1.40E+01
Option 1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
A-4
-------
TABLE A-2 (continued)
POLLUTANT REMOVALS
TRUCK CHEMICAL SUBCATEGORY
DIRECT DISCHARGERS
Pollutants Removed
(grams)
.
Chemical
Disulfoton
EPN
Leptophos
Merphos
Tetrachlorvinphos
Beta-BHC
Gamma-BHC
Gamma-Chlordane
Chlorobenzilate
4,4'-DDT
Diallate
Dieldrin
Endosulfan II
Endosulfan Sulfate
Nitrofen
Pentachloronitrobenzene
Simazine
Terbuthylazine
2,4-D
Dalapon
2,4-DB (Butoxon) •
Dinbseb
MCPA
MCPP
Picloram . . • ,
2,4,5-T
2,4,5-TP
Aluminum
Boron .
Chromium
Copper
Manganese
Mercury
Tin
Titanium
Zinc . •
Fluoride
Total Cyanide
Total .
Option 1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
. ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
. ND
ND
ND
ND
Conversion Factors
Grams/
Pounds
2.21E-03 .
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
. 2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
. 2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
. 2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
1 2^1E-03
2:21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03,
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2^1E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
Toxic
Weighting
Factor
1.20E+02
7.60E+02
1.10E+01
2.50E401
1.40E-01
1.20E-HH
7-OOE401
2.30E+03
1.60E-01
6.50E-H)3
8.40E-03
5.70E-H14
l.OOE+02
l.OOE+02
4.80E-02
2.70E-01
5.60E-01
1.20E-02 •
3.10E-03
5.10E-03
3.60E-02
1.90E+00
1.60E-02
6.90E-03
2.10E-HM)
2.80E-01
1.80E-01
6.40E-02
1.80E-01
2.70E-02
4.70E-01
1.40E-02
5.00E-H)2
3.00E-01
2.90E-02
5.10E-02 ,
3.50E-02
1.10E-KK)
Pound Equivalents
Removed
Option 1
ND
. ND
ND
ND
ND
- ' ND '
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
. ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Note: Pound Equivalent Removals are rounded to the nearest 0.1 pounds.
ND: Not disclosed due to business confidentiality.
A-5
-------
TABLE A-3
POLLUTANT REMOVALS
TRUCK CHEMICAL SUBCATEGORY
INDIRECT DISCHARGERS
Chemical
Acetone
Benzene
Chloroform
1,2-Difhloroclhinc
Ethylbcnzene
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methyl isoburyl ketone
Methylene chloride
TctracMoroethylene
Toluene
1 , 1 ,1 -Trichloroethane
Trichlorocthylene
m-Xytene
o+p-Xylcne
alpha-Terpineol
Benzoic acid
Benzyl alcohol
bis (2-Elhylhexyl) phthalate
2-ChlorophcnoI
c-Cresol
p-Cresol
p-Cyrncne
n-Dccar.c
1,2-Dichlorobcnzene
Di-n-octyl phthalate
n-Docosane
n-Dodecane
n-Eicosane
n-Hexacosane
n-Hexadecane
2-lsopropylnaphthalene
2-Methylnaphthalene
Naphthalene
n-Octadecane
Styrene
n-Tetracosane
n-Tetradccinc
n-Tnacontane
Azinphos ethyl
Azinphos methyl
Coumaphos
Dichlofenthion
Disulfoton
EPN „ " , '.!!
Leptophos
Mcrphos
Tcirachlorvinphos
BcU-BHC
Garnma-BHC
11 ' i ' I i,
Pollutants Removed (grams)
Option 1 Option 2
5,339,900
47,644
86,035
872,084
694,101
959,988
2,126,203
11,277,856
1,895,281
2,675,315
1,166,864
25,246
3,323,103
1,696,641
87,218
4,440,034
462,452
885,667
96,988
119,379
13,203
88,348
609,225
166,571
289,842
177,778
1,953,996
496,207
245,016
1,225,579
312,255
116,143
518,448
665,257
4,968,651
306,652
833,354
368,287
3,691
2,634
6,850
3,098
3,073
6,419
8,660
408
2,337
657
43
77,546,967
47,644
86,035
1,069,385
922,804
13,319,798
4,691,831
28,216,148
2,056,639
3,618,728
1,328,083
25,246
3,718,177
1,941,937
777,520
43,439,088
462,452
885,667
96,988
119,379
212,386
88,348
609,225
166,571
289,842
177,778
1,953,996
496,207
245,016
1,225,579
312.255
116,143
518,448
665,257
6,658,645
306,652
833,354
368,287
3,691
2,634
6,850
3,098
42,982
6,419
8,660
3,450
2,337
657
563
Conversion Factors
Grams/
Pounds
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
.2.21E-03
" 2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
. 2.21E-63
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-63
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-63
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
Toxic
Weighting
Factor
7.60E-06
1.80E-02
2.10E-03
6.20E-03
1.40E-03
2.20E-05
1. 206-04
4.20E-04
7.40E-02
5.60E-03
4.30E-03
6.30E-02
1.50E-03
8.50E-03
l.OOE-03
3.30E-04
5.60E-03
1.10E-01
3.30E-02
3.30E-03
2.40E-03
4.30E-02
4.30E-03
1.10E-02
2.20E-01
8.20E-05
4.30E-03
4.30E-03
8.20E-05
4JOE-03
9.80E-02
1.80E-02
1.50E-02
4.30E-03
1.40E-02
8.20E-05
4.30E-03
8.20E-05
5.10E-H)3
2.80E+01
5.60E+03
1.40E+01
1.20E+02
7.60E-K)2
lllOE'+Ol
2.50E-H11
1.40E-01
1.20E+01
7.00E+01
POTW
Removal
Factor
1.63E-01
5.24E-02
2.66E-01
1.10E-01
6.21E-02
8.17E-02
1.21E-01
4.57E-01
1.54E-01
3.82E-02
9.55E-02
1.30E-01
3.46E-01
4.93E-02
5.40E-02
1.95E-01
2.20E-01
4.02E-01
5.00E-02
4.75E-01
2.83E-01
2.10E-03
9.10E-01 '
1.10E-01
1.70E-01
1.20E-01
4.95E-02
7.60E-02
2.89E-01
2.89E-01
7.20E-01
7.20E-01
5.31E-02
2.89E-01
6.35E-02
2.89E-01
2.89E-01
2.89E-01
l.bOE-KX)
2.60E-01
l.OOE+00
l.OOE+00
1.00E-HM)
l.OOE+00
l.OOE+00
l.OOE+00
l.OOE+00
5.70E-01
4.80E-01
Pound Equivalents Removed
'i
Option 1 Option 2
0.0
0.1
0.1 ,
1.3
0.1
0.0
0.1
4,8
47.7
1.3
1.1
0.5
3.8
1.6
0.0
0.6
. 1.3
86.6
0.4
0.4
0.0
0.0
5.3
0.4
24.0
0.0
0.9
0.4
0.0
3.4
48.7
3.3
0.9
1.8
9.8
0.0
2.3
0.0
41,602.7
42.4
84,778.6
95.8
815.0
10,781.2
210.5
22.5,
0.7
9.9
" 3.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
1.6
0.2
0.1
0.2
12.0
51.8
1.7
1.2
0.5
4.3
1.8
0.1
6.2
1.3
86.6
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.0
5.3
0.4
24.0
0.0
"0.9
0.4
0.0
3.4
48.7
3.3
0.9
1.8
13.1
0.0
2.3
0.0
41,602.7
42.4
84,778.6
95.8
11,398.9
10,781.2
210.5
190.6
0.7
9.9
41.8
A-6
-------
TABLE A-3 (continued)
POLLUTANT REMOVALS
TRUCK CHEMICAL SUBCATEGORY
INDIRECT DISCHARGERS
• Pollutants Removed (grams)
Chemical
Gamma-Chlordane
Chlorobenzilate
4,4'-DDT
Diallate
Dieldrin
Endosulfan II
Endosulfan Sulfate
Nitrofen
Pentachloronitrobenzene
Simazine
Terbuthylazine
2,4-D
Dalapon
2,4-DB (Butoxon)
Dinoseb
MCPA
MCPP
Picloram
2,4,5-T*
2,4,5-TP
Aluminum
Boron
Chromium
Copper
Manganese
Mercury
Tin
Titanium
Zinc
Fluoride
Total Cyanide
Total
Option 1
312
6,502
545
22,734
240
5,451
545
1,146
13,412
50,330
'27,814
771
163
2,045
464
602,972
32,352
1,717
505
618
9,701,403
600,194
3,348,407 '
358,712
310,770
2,518
2,219,944
312,691
1,001,177
3,785,250
3,482
74,085,872
Option 2
312
6,692
545
39,515 '
240
5,451
545
1,146
. 13,412
50,330
27,814
771
1,912
15,679
• 464
893,365
302,355
1,717
505
618
12,037,074
10,322,761
3,348,407
358,712
310,770
2,577
27,404,992
312,691
1,001,177
68,308,331
42,227
324,508,'954
Conversion Factors
Grams/
Pounds
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-Q3
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
' 2.21E-03
2.21E4)3
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
Toxic
Weighting
Factor
2.30E+03
.1.60E-01
6.50E+03
8.40E-03
5.70E404
l.OOE+02
l.OOE+02
4.80E-02
2.70E-01
5.60E-01
1.20E-02
3.10E-03
, 5.10E-03 ..
3.60E-02
1.90E+00
1.60E-02
6.90E-03
2.10E-HM)
2.80E-01
1.80E-01
6.40E-02
1.80E-01
2.70E-02
4.70E-01
1.40E-02
5.00E-+02
3.00E-01
2.90E-02
• 5.10E-02
3.50E-02
1.10E-KIO
POTW
Removal
Factor
5.00E-01
l.OOE+00
4.00E-01
1.00E400
1.40E-01
5.00E-01
4.20E-01
l.OOE+00
l.OOE+00
l.OOE+00
l.OOE+00
5.10E-01 .
l.OOE+00
l.OOE+00
l.OOE+00
l.OOE+00
l.OOE+00
1.00E+Od
4.40E-01
5.60E-01
U20E-01
7.70E-01 '
3.30E-01
1.60E-01
5.90E-01
4.00E-01
3.50E-01
3.12E-01
2.20E-01'
3.90E-01
2.96E-01
Pound Equivalents Removed
Option 1
792.4 '
. 2.3
3,131.9
0.4
4,240.4
602.3
50.6
0.1
8.0
62.3
0.7
0.0
0.0
0.2
1.9
21.3
0.5
8.0
0.1
O.I
164.7
183.8
65.9
59.6
5.7
1,113.2
515.1
6.3
24.9
114.2
2:5
149,794.8
Option 2
792.4
2.4
3,131.9
0.7
4,240.4
602.3
50.6
0.1
8.0
62.3
0.7
0.0
0.0
1-2
1.9
31.6
4.6
8.0
0.1
0.1
204.3
3,161.9
65.9
59.6
5.7
1,139.1
6,359.3
6.3
24.9
2,060.6
30.3
171,485.9
Note: Pound Equivalent Removals are rounded to the nearest 0.1 pounds.
A-7
-------
TABLE A-4
POLLUTANT REMOVALS
RAIL CHEMICAL SUBCATEGORY
DIRECT DISCHARGERS
Pollutants Removed (grams)
Cbcmkal
Acetone
Ethylbcozene
Methyl ethyl Icctooc
m-Xytene
o+p-XyUne
Anthracene
Beazoic acid
Bipiienyl
Cubuote
p-CrtJol
2,4-Dumiaotoluenc
a-Docounc
n-Dodecanc
n-Eicoune
Fluonntisenc
n-Hcxicoionc
B*Hcxadecane
2-Metbylaapbdulrae
l-Melhylpbeninthrene
Naphthalene
n-Ocucosine
n-Ocudccinc
PBenintErcne
Phenol
Pyicoc
Stytcne
B-TetncotiBC
n-Tetradccane
n-TriacoQUac
Dioxjthioo
Tetrachlorvrnphoi
Tofcuthioa
Triehtoribo
Trichlorooate
Trimctbyipboipbite
Accpiutc
AlicWor
Atraane
Bcncflunlin
Alpfaa-BHC
BeU-BHC
Dclu-BHC
Gamma-BHC
Bromacil
Bromoxynil ocunoate
BuucUot
Optafol
Captan
CubophCTOthioa
AJpha-Chlorfine
Gtniina»ChJ0rdane
Chlorobcaxilitc
Chtoroocb
Dicthil (DCPA)
4,4'-DDD
Option 1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Option 2 Option 3
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Conversion Factors
Grams/
Pounds
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.2IE-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
. 2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.2IE-03
2.21E-03
2.2IE-03
^lE-OS
2.21E-03
2.2IE-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
- 2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.2IE-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
' 2J1E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2J1E-03
2J1E-03
^
Toxic
Weighting
Factor
7.60E-06
1.40E-03
2.20E-05,
1.50E-03 -
8.SOE-03
2.50E+00
3.30E-04
3.70E-02
2.70E+01
2.40E-03
1.80E-01
8.20E-05
4.30E-03
4.30E-03
9.20E-01
8.20E-05
4.30E-03
1.80E-02
1.40E-01
l.SOE-02
8.20E-OS
4.30&103
1.90E+01
2.80E-02
7.SOE-02
1.40E-02
8.20E-05
4.30E-03
8.20E-05
6.22E+01
" '1.40&01
9JOE-03
7.00E+02
5.60E+03
1.90E-03
1.30E-02
1.60E-02
' 9.40E-02
I.60E-01
4.30E+01
1.20E-H)1
8.60E-02
7.00E+01
5.60E-03
1.10E+00
7.40E-03
2.70E+00
1.60E+00
6.60E-01
2.30E+03
2.30E+03 •
1.60E-01
4.70E-03
9.50E-03
7.60E-H)2
Pound Equivalents Removed
Option 1 Option 2'
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Options
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
"- ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
"•ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
N6
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
A-8
-------
TABLE A-4 (continued)
POLLUTANT REMOVALS
RAIL CHEMICAL SUBCATEGORY
DIRECT DISCHARGERS
Pollutants Removed (grams)
Chemical
4,4'-DDE
4,4'-DDT
Diallate
Dicblonc
Dicofol
Dicldrin
Endosulfan I
Endosulfan Sulfate
Endrin
Endrin aldehyde ..
Endrin ketone
Ethalfluralin
Etradiazolc
Fenarimol
Heptachlpr epoxide
Isodrin
Isopropalin
Methoxychlor
Metribuzin
Mirex
Nitrofen
Pendametbalin
Pentacbloionitrobcnzene .
ClS-Peimethrin
Perthane
Propachlor
Propazine
Simazine
Strobanc
Terbacil
Terbuthylazine
Triadimefon
Trifluialin
2,4-D
Dalapon
2,4-DB (Butoxon)
Dicamba
Dichloroprop
Dinoseb
MCPA
MCPP
Picloram
2,4,5-T
2,4,5-TP
Aluminum
Barium
Chromium
Copper
Titanium
Zinc
Fluoride
Tool
Option 1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND '
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND -^ '
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
' ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
' ND
ND
Option 2 Option 3
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND'
ND
'. ND
ND
ND
ND
ND.
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND ,
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND . '
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
•ND
• ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND_
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Conversion Factors
Grams/
Pounds
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
" 2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
231E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
, 2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-Q3
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.2IE-03
' 2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
Toxic
Weighting
Factor
9.50E+02
6.50E+03
8.40E-03
4.00E+01 .
5.70E+02
5.70E+04
l.OOE+02
l.OOE+02
9.80E+01
9.80E+0!
9.80E+01
7.50E+00
4.60E-03
6.20E-02
6.80E+03 '
, 1.40E+01
S.80E-01
1.90E+02
1.30E-03
5.60E+03
4.80E-02
1.SOE-OI
2.70E-01
3.40E+00
1.40E+01
3.30E-01
4.70E-03
5.60E-01
1.10E+02
8.00E-01
1.20E-02
5.80E-03
4.20E+00 ,'
3.10E-03
5.10E-03
3.60E-02
1.50E-02
9.30E-02
1.90E+00
1.60E-02
6.90E-03
2.10E+00
2.80E-01
1.80E-01
6.40E-02 -
2.00E-03
2.70E-02
4.70E-01
2.90E-02
5.10E-02
3.SOE-02
Pound Equivalents Removed
Option 1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND -
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Option 2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
, ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
. ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
' ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
, ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Option 3
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND '
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
'ND '
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
"ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
' ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Note: Pound Equivalent Removals are rounded to the nearest 0.1 pounds.
ND: Not disclosed due to business confidentiality.
A-9
-------
TABLE A-S
: . ''•'';' ',.•'.•''
POLLUTANT REMOVALS
RAIL CHEMICAL SUBCATEGORY
INDIRECT DISCHARGERS
Pollutants Removed (grams)
Chemical
Ethylbenzene
Methyl ethyl ketone
rn-Xyferte
o+pOtylene
Anthracene
BenzoJG acid
Carbazole
p-Cresol
2,4-Diaminotoluene
n-Docosane
n-Dodecanc
n-Eicosane
Fluoranthene
rtrHexacosane
n-Hexadecane
i-Mclhylphenanthiene
Naphthalene
n-Octacosane
n-Octadccane
Fttcnanthrcne
Phenol
Pyrcne
Serene
nrTetraeoiane
n-Tetradeeane
n-Triacontane
Dtoxathion
Tetrachlorvinphos
Toicuthion
Triehlorfon
Trkhloronate
Trimethylphosphate
Acephatc
Alachlor
Atnrinc
Benefluralin
Alpha-BHC
Bcu-BHC
D«lU-BHC
Gamma«BHC
Bramacil
Btomoscynil octanoate
Biiuchlor
Capiafoi
Captan
Carbophcnothion
Alpha-Chlotdane
Gunmi-Chlordinc
Chlorobenzilate
CWoroneb
Dtethal(DCPA)
4,4'-DDD
4,4'-DDE
4,4'-DDT
Diallite
Option 1
'(i "
227
847
512
336
25.156
6351
19.193^
107
3,935
75,837
94.129
313,631
29,607
39,782
637,418
25.016
4,124
22.610
374351
63,656
1.101
22.698
47,209
64,766
429.663
23.826
970
215
438
1,053
161
521
14330
35
206
143
7
7.982
91
27
58
30
51
205
58
117
10
5
" , M
48
78
35
0
28
53,876
Option 2
"
227
847
512
336
25,156
6351
19,193
107
3.935
75,837
99^963
317,494
29,607
39.782
637,418
25,016
14342
22,610
377,403
63,656
1,101
22.698
47,209
64,766
432,950
23,826
970
215
438
1,053
161
521
17,760
35
4,787
292
25
7,990
95
31
144
84
53
205
143
117
10
15
1J2
1,093
83
35
0
38
59,594
. .,,.•
Option 3
29,971
97,956
68,604
44,656
25,156
860,040
19,193
13,189
547,875
75,837
99,963
317,494
29,607
39,782
637,418
25,016
14342
22.610
377,403
63,656
154,730
22,698
47,209
64,766
432,950
23,826
970
215
438
1,053
161
521
201,222
35
15,978
411
26
7,991
95
83
'144
84
53
205
171
117
10
15
182
6,796
83
35
30
38
59,594
Conversion Factors
Grams/
Pounds
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-d3
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
: Toxic
Weighting
Factor
1
1.40E-03
2.20E-05
1.50E-03
8.50E-03
2.50E+00
330E-04
2.70E-01
2.40E-03
1.80E-01
8.20E-05
430E-03
430E-03
9.20E-01
8.20E-OS
430E-03
1.40E-01
1.50E-02
8.20E-05
430E-03
1.90E+01
2.80E-02
7.50E-02
1.40E-02
8.20E-05
430E-03
8.20E-05
6.22E+01
1.40E-01
930E-03
7.00E+02
5.60E+03
1.90E-03
130E-02
1.60E-02
9.40E-02
1.60E-01
430E+01 '
1.20E+01
2.80E-01
7.00E+01
5.60E-03
1.10E400
7.40E-03
2.70E+00
i.eOE-HK)
6.60E-01
230E+03
230E403
1.60E-01
4.76E-03
9.50E-03
7.60E+02
9.50E+02
6.50E+03
•8.40E-03
POTW
Removal
Factor
: ,,
6.21E-02
8.17E-02
3.46E-01
4.93E-02
4.00E-02
I.95E-01
l.OOE+00
2.83E-01
l.OOE+00
1.20E-01
4.95E-02
7.60E-02
5.80E-01
2.89E-01
2.89E-01
5.00E-02
531E-02
2.89E-01
2.89E-01
5.ME-02
4.75Er02
5.00E-02
635E-02
2.89E-01
2.89E-01
2.89E-01
l.OOE-MX)
l.OOE+00
l.OOE+00
l.OOE+00
l.OOE+00
l.OOE+00
l.OOE+00
l.OOE+00
5.80E-01
l.OOE+00
3.60E-01
5.70E-01
l.OOE+00
4.80E-01
l.OOE+00
l.OOE+00
l.OOE+00
l.OOE+00
l.OOE+00
l.OOE+00
5.00E-01
5.00E-01
l.OOE+00
l.OOE+00
l.OOE+00
l.OOE+00
l.OOE+00
4.00E-01
l.OOE+00
Pound Equivalents Removed
Option 1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
5.6
0.0
11.5
0.0
1.6
0.0
0.0
0.2
34.9
0.0
1.7
0.4
0.0
0.0
1.0
136.6
0.0
0.2
0.1
0.0
1.2
0.0
1333
0.1
0.0
1,629.1
1,989.6
0.0
0.4
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.2
120.7
0.1
2.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
1.2
0.2
0.2
25.2
11.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
58.1
0.7
163.4
I'JO
Option 2
0.0
0.0
0.0'
0.0
5.6
6.0
11.5
0.0
1.6
0.0
0.0
0.2
34.9
0.0
1.7
0.4
0.0
0.0
1.0
136.6
0.0
0.2
0.1
0.0
1.2
0.0
133.3
0.1
0.0
1.629.1
1,989.6
0.0
0.5
0.0
0.6
0.1
0.9
120.8
0.1
2.3
0.0
0.2
0.0
1.2
0.5
0.2
25.2
36.9
0.1
0.0
0.0
58.1
0.7
216.0
1.1
Option 3
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
5.6
0.1
11.5
0.0
217.9
0.0
0.0
0.2
34.9
0.0
1.7
0.4
0.0
0.0 '
1.0
136.6
0.5
0.2
0.1
0.0
1.2
0.0
133.3
0.1
0.0
1,629.1
1,989.6
0.0
5.8
. 0.0
1.9
0.1
0.9
120.8
0.1
6.1
0.0
0.2
0.0
1.2
0.6
0.2
25.2
36.9
O.I
0.1
0.0
58.1
63.9
216.0
1.1
A-10
-------
TABLE A-5 (continued)
POLLUTANT REMOVALS
RAIL CHEMICAL SUBCATEGORY
INDIRECT DISCHARGERS
Pollutants Removed (grams)
Chemical
Dichlone
Dicofol
Dieldrin
Endosulfan I
Endosuifan Sulfate
Endrin
Endrin aldehyde
Endrin ketone
Ethalfluralin
Etradiazole
Fenarimol
Heptachlor epoxide
Isodrin
Isopropalin
Methoxychlor
Metribuzin
Mirex
Nitrofen
Pendamethalin
Pentachloronitrobenzene
ClS-Permethrin
Perthane
Propachlor
Propazine
Simazine
Strobane
Terbacil
Terbuthylazine
Triadimefon
Trifluralin ,
2,4-D
Dalapon
2,4-DB (Butoxon)
Dicamba
Dichloroprop
Dinoseb
MCPA
MCPP
Picloram
2,4,5-T
2,4,5-TP
Aluminum
Barium
Chromium
Copper
Titanium
Zinc
Fluoride
Total
Option 1 ,
2
77
- 323
6
34
12
74
, 7
169
0
18
7
28
29
1
22
2
143
36
IS
221
10,539
3,672
3,123
5,527,713
13,571
5,665
5,030
89
81
10,203
3,082
4,320
4,533
10,518
3,885
58,670
645,846
44
1,602
187
1,659,717
23,466
5,044
2,469
1,726
7,616
6,154'
10,426,724
Option 2
56
207
355
14
42
30
80
18
455
0
56
22
28
80
1
22
36
170 ,
104
71
718
10,539
3,672
3,123
5,73 1,258
13,571
5,665
119,083
101
207 .
11,686
3,082
17,029
66,905
11,499
4,630
343,090
4,634,697
44
1,884
, 1,579
1,659,717
121,891
• 22303
17,684
17,095
76,451
6,154
15355,713
OptionS
56
207
368
18
42
38
109
18
1,312
3!
56
22
28
108
63
22
36
176
107
81
718 '
10,607
3,672
3,123
6,675,665 •
13,571
5,665 .
' 727,211
101
253
11,686
3,082
21,095
67,021
13,678
4,630
368398
5,186,698.
6,233
2,027
. 1,579
3,789,760
121,891
22303
17,684
17,095
. 76,451
687,802
22315,298
Conversion Factors
-
Grams/
Pounds
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
. 2.21E-03
2.21E-03
' 2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
. 2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
, 2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
, 2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
Toxic
Weighting
Factor
4.00E+01
5.70E+02
5.70E+04
I.OOE+02
l.OOE+02
9.80E+01
9.80E+01
9.80E-01
7.50E+00 ,
4.60E-03
6.20E-02
6.80E+03
1.40E+01
5.80E-01
1.90E+02
130E-03
5.60E+03
4.80E-02
1.50E-01
2.70E-01
3.40E+00
1.40E+01
330E-01
4.70E-03
5.60E-01
1.10E+02
8.00E-01
1.20E-02
5.80E-03
4.20E-HX)
3.10E-03
5.10E-03
3.60E-02
1.50E-02
930E-02
1.90E-HX)
. 1.60E-02
6.90E-03
2.10E+00
2.80E-01
1.80E-01
6.40E-02
2.00E-03
2.70E-02
4.70E-01
2.90E-02
5.10E-02
3.50E-02
POTW
Removal
Factor
l.OOE+00
l.OOE-KK) ,
1.40E-01
S.OOE-01
4.20E-01
5.00E-01
l.OOE+00
l.OOE+00
l.OOE+00
l.OOE+00
l.OOE+00
l.OOE+00
l.OOE+00
l.OOE+00
4.20E-01
l.OOE+00
l.OOE+00
l.OOE+00
l.OOE+00
l.OOE+00
l.OOE+00
l.OOE+00
l.OOE+00
. l.OOE+00
l.OOE+00
l.OOE+00
l.OOE+00.
, l.OOE+00
l.OOE+00
2.90E-01
5.10E-01
l.OOE+00
l.OOE+00
l.OOE+00
l.OOE+00
l.OOE+00 .
l.OOE+00
l.OOE+00
l.OOE+00
4.40E-01
5.60E-01
1.20E-01
6.40E-01
3.30E-01
1.59E-01 -
3.12E-01
2.20E-01
3.90E-01
Pound Equivalents Removed ,
Option 1
0.2
97.3
5,696.9
0.6
3.2
1.3
16.0,
0.0
2.8
0.0
0.0
111.7
0.9
0.0
0.1
0.0
20.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.7
326.1
2.7
0.0
6,841.1
3,299.0
10.0
0.1
0.0
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.3
0.2
22
16.3
2.1
9.8
0.2
0:4
0.0
28.2
0.1
0.1
0.4
0.0
0.2
0.2
20.825.6
Option 2
5.0
260.6
6,255.2
• 1.5
3.9
3.2
.17.3
0.0
7.5
0.0
0.0
335.3
0.9
0.1
0.1
0.0
443.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
5.4
326.1
2.7
0.0
7,093.0
3,299.0
10.0
3.2
0.0
0.6
0.0
0.0
1.4
2.2
2.4
19.4
12.1
70.7
0.2
0.5
0.4
28.2
0.3
0.4
2.9
03
1.9
0.2
22,630.8
•Option3
5.0
260.6
6,487.7
2.0
3.9
4.1
23.6
0.0
21.8
0.0
0.0
335.3
0.9
0.1
11.2
0.0
443.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
5.4
328.2
2.7
0.0
8,261.8
3,299.0
10.0
19.3
0.0
0.7
0.0
0.0
1.7
2.2
2.8
19.4
13.0
79.1
28.9
0.6
0.4
64.3
0.3
0.4
2.9
0.3
1.9
20.7
24,470.0
Note: Pound Equivalent Removals are rounded to the nearest 0.1 pounds.
A-ll
-------
TABLE A-6
'.., v '" ||H :
PQLLIJTANT REMOVALS
BARGE CHEMICAL SUBCATEGORY
DIRECT DISCHARGERS
1
Chemical
Acetone
Acrylonitrile
Benzene
Chloroform
Ethylbenzene
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methyl isobutyl ketone
Mcthylcnc chloride
Toluene
ra-Xylcne
o+p-Xylene
Acenaphihene
Acenaphthylene
Anthracene
2,3-Beozofluorene
Benzoic acid
Biphcnyl
bis (2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate
p-Cymene
n-Decane
3,6-Dimethylphenanthrcne
Di-n-octyl phthalate
n-Docosinc
n-Dodecane
n-Eicosinc
Fluorenc
n-Hcxacosinc
n-Hexadecane
i-Mcthylfluorene
2-Mcthylnaphthalene
1-Methylphenanthrene
Naphthalene
n-Octacosane
n-Octmdecane
Penttmethylbenzene
Phenanlhrene
Phenol
Pyrene
Styrene
n-tetracosane
n-Tetradeeane
D»Upon
Aluminum
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Hexavalent Chromium
Iron
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Pollutants Removed (grams)
Option 1 Option 2
2,434,613
2,265,455
255,727
4,958
174,257
2,625;822
1,034,816
2,042
375,373
136,744
115,739
61,498
50,807
41,233
17,813
37,339
230,862
84,472
57,377
5,804,201
38,443
55,164
291,322
3,111,416
898,961
94,496
• 33,127
3,405,439
82,616
616,462
189,808
6,327,446
14,583
1,741,022
276,205
144,952
15,630
78,242
15,392,801
176,309
5,988,921
680
1,739,789
91
5,352
27,025
141,243
6,228
40,055,479
47,952
201,760
383
3,432,577
2,265,455
299,036
4,958
238,038
2,689,349
1,034,816
2,042
447,222
220,292
230,304
61,498
50,807
41,233
17,813
37,339
230,862
84,472
57,377
5,809,280
38,443
55,164
291,322
3,129,225
898,961
94,496
33,127
3,410,129
82,616
632,606
189,808
6,352,165
14,583
1,741,022
276,205
144,952
15,630
78,242
15,450,225
176,309
5,995,600
686
2,068,475
91
5,352
27,025
141,243
6,228
41,182,205
47,952
331,409
383 '
Conversion Factors
Grams/
Pounds
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
. 2.21E-03
* 2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
, 2.21E-03
2.21E-03
Toxic
Weighting
Factors
7.6E-06
8.5E-01
1.8E-02
2.1E-03
1.4E-03
2i2E-05
1.2E-04
4.2E-04
5.6E-03
1.5E-03
8.5E-03
2.5E-01
8.4E-03
2.5E+00
2.2E-01
3.3E-04
3.7E-02
l.lE-01
4.3E-02
4.3E-03
4.7E-01
2.2E-OI
8.2E-05
4.3E-03
4.3E-03
7.0E-01
8.2E-05
4.3E-03
8.9E-02
1.8E-02
1.4E-01
1.5E-02
8.2E-05
4.3E-03
2.9E-01
1.9E-K)!
2.8E-02
7.5E-02
1.4E-02
8.2E-05
4.3E-03
5.1E-03
6.4E-02 ,
5.3E+00
5.2E+00
2.7E-02
4.7E-01
5.1E-01
5.6E-03
1.8E-H)0
\AE-OZ
5.0E+02
Pound Equivalents Removed
Option 1
0.0
4,255.7
10.2
0.0
0.5
0.1
0.3
0.0
4.6
0.5
2.2
34.0
0.9
227.8
8.7
0.0
18.9
20.5
5.5
55.2
39.9
26.8
0.1
29.6
8.5
146.2
0.0
32.4
16.2
24.5
58.7
209.8
0.0
16.5
177.0
6,086.5
1.0
13.0
476.3
0.0
56.9
0.0
246.1
1.1
61.5
1.6
146.7
7.0
495.7
190.8
6.2
423.7
Option 2
0.1
4,255.7
11.9
0.0
0.7
0.1
0.3
0.0
5.5
0.7
4.3
34.0
0.9
227.8
8.7
0.0
18.9
20.5
5.5
55.2
39.9
26.8
0.1
29.7
8.5
146.2
0.0
32.4
16.2
25.2
58.7
210.6
0.0
16.5
177.0
6,086.5
1.0
13.0
478.0
0.0
57.0
0.0
292.6
1.1
61.5
1.6
146.7
7.0
509.7
190.8
10.3
423.7
A-12
-------
TABLE A-6/continued)
POLLUTANT REMOVALS
BARGE CHEMICAL SUECATEGORV
DIRECT DISCHARGERS
Pollutants Removed (grams)
Conversion Factors
Pound Equivalents Removed
Chemical
Molybdenum '
Nickel
Tantalum
Titanium
Zinc
Zirconium
Fluoride
Option 1
120
. 116,673
23,762
3,124
1,749,307
211
947
Option 2
59,013
, 172,872
23,762
3,124
2,306,634
211
947
Grams/
Pounds
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
Toxic .
-. Weighting
Factors
2.0E-01
3.6E-02
6.0E-02
2.9E-02
5.1E-02
5.4E-01
3.5E-02
Option 1
0.1
9.3
3.2
0.2
197.2
0.3
0.1
Option 2
26.1
13.8
3.2
0.2
260.0
0.3
0.1
Total
98,904,640 102,733,203
13,856.1
14,022.7
Note: Pound Equivalent Removals are rounded to the nearest 0.1 pounds.
A-13
-------
TABLE A-7
• POLLUTANT REMOVALS
BARGE CHEMICAL SUBCATEGORY
INDIRECT DISCHARGERS
1 Pollutants Removed (grams)
*
Owmkal
AMtOOC
XayfenMe
BeUE«
OwJIUIOtlH
EAy!tcutTK
M«M ethyl kewoe
Methyl iiotxjylketone
Mohytaechfaide
Totunx
m-X)kne
e*p-Xjtoe
Atoujihihene
AwiUffcthytaK
AmhnicDX
ZJ-BtKBflyortne
BtWDKJCKl
BSptetf
til (I-EAj Dirt>i) phthilaie
p-Cymnx:
nDranc
XS-Dimeihylphenanthrtne
DifHXt>1phthi!tt
n-Dococwc
a-Dodccane
a-Seocine
Ouocroe
R-Heuceonc
n-Hcudecanc
l-Mcthjinuocnx
I-MohySrapWukne
l-,V(«h>!phcTUni)urnc
%**»>««
n-Octacoune
a-Qctadecane
Penumohylticnane
rbcnarTOftrxf ,
«*nol
F)TOK
®«yrcsie
n-Tctncocifle
a*Ton&cane
Dil*pcn
Aluminum
BffyHwn
Cadmknt
CflfOfwurn
Cooper
Hcxjvslcnt Ovon&um
ken
Lad
Maafanac
Mcrctiy
Molybdenum
NKld
Twufam
TiUiWJm
Ztoe
Zireorarara
T«U1
Option 1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Option 2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
. ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Option 3
ND "
' ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Conversion Factors
,, Grams/
Pounds
2ilE-03
2.21E-03
2.2IE-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21 E-03
2.21 E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
121 E-03
121 E-03
2.2IE-03
, 2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.2I&03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E^)3
121E-03
121E-03
Z21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
121E-03
• 121E-03
2.21E-03
2.2IE-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21&03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
121E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
121E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21 E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21 E-03
2.21E-03
Toxic
Wcigh'ting
Factors
7.60E-06
8.50E-01
1.80E-02
2.10E-03
1.40E-03
2.20E-05
1.20E-04
4.20E-04
160E-03
1 JOE-03
8.SOEJH
2.50E-01
8.40E-03
2.50E+00
2.20E-01
3.30E-04
3.70E-02
1.10E-01
4.30E-02
4.30E-03
4.70E-01
2.20E-01
8.20E-05
4.30E-03
4.30E-O3
7.00E-01
820E-05
4.30E-03
8.90E-02
I.80E-02
1.40E-01
I.50E-02
8.20E-05
4.30E-03
2.90E-01
1.90E+01
2.80E-02
7.50E-02
1.40E-02 '
8.20E-OS
4.30E^)3
5.10E-03
6.40E-02
5.30E+00
5.20E+00
2.70E-02
4.70E-01
5.IOE-01
5.60E-03
I.SOE+00
1.40E-02
5.00E+02
2.00E-01
3.60E-02 ^
6.00E-02
2.90E-02
5.10E-02
5.40E-OI
POTW
Removal
Factor
I.63E-01
5.00E-02
' 5 24E-02
2.66E-01
6.21E-02
8.17E-02
1.21E-01
4.57E-01
3.82E-02
3.46E^>1
4.93E-02
2.00E-02
5.00E-02
4.00E-02
3.00E-01
. I.95E-01
4.00E-02
4.02E-01
l.OOE-02
9.10E-01
5.00&O2
1.70E-01
1.20E-OI
4.95E-02
7.60E-02
3.00E-01
2.89E-01
2.89E-01
3.00E-01
7.20E-01
5.00E-02
5.3IE-02
2.90E-01
2.89E-01
9.00E-02
S.OOE-02
5.00E-02
5.00E-02
'6.35E-02
2.89E-01
.2.89E-01
I.OOE4OO
1.20E-01
5.40E-01
l.OOE-01
3.30E-01
1.60E-01
9.40E-01
1.70E-01
8.00E-02
5.90EX)i
4.00E-01
4.80E-01
4.90E-01
4.50E-01
3.I2E-01
2.20E-01
i.OOE+OO
Pound Equivalents Removed
Option 1
ND
ND
ND
ND ,
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
"ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Ni>
ND
ND
Option 2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
i ND
ND
ND
ND '
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Option 3
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
• ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Note: Powd Equivalent Removite are rounded to the nearest 0,1 pounds.
ND No* (£&ck«Gd due to business confidentiality.
A-14
-------
TABLE A-8
POLLUTANT REMOVALS
TRUCK PETROLEUM SUBCATEGORY
INDIRECT DISCHARGERS
Pollutants
": Removed (grams)
Chemical Option 1
Acetone
Benzene
1,2-Dichloroe thane
Ethylbenzene
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methyl isobutyl ketone
Methylene chloride
Tetrachloroethylene
Toluene
1 , 1 , 1 -Trichloroethane
Trichloroethylene
Vinyl Acetate
m-Xylene
o+p-Xylene
Benzoic acid
Biphenyl
bis (2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate
4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol
n-Decane
Diphenyl Ether
n-Docosane
n-Dodecane
n-Eicosane
h-Hexacosane
n-Hexadecane
Hexanoic Acid
2-Isopropylnaphthalene .
2-Methylnaphthalene
Naphthalene
n-Octacosane
n-Octadecane
Pentamethylbenzene
Phenol
n-Tetracosane
n-Tetradecarie
n-Triacontane
Tripropyleneglycol Methyl Ether
Aluminum
Antimony ' . ,
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium • '
Boron
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
364,973
13,733
701
10,254
32,958
3,493
2,226
961
54,707
• 3,274
702
3,766
16,445
8,016
17,370
385
103
17,578
46,633
11
3,185
34,547
16,550
3,235
21,426
6,022
4,151
3,711
3,513
2,259
7,248
3,909
2,705
3,445
10,209
87
113,949
13,642
55
143
2,410
29
38,658
175
107,780
1,359
Crams/
Pounds
2:21E-03
.2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03 ;
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
, 2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03 .
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03 .
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
Conversion Factors
Toxic
Weighting
Factors
7.6E-06
1.8E-02
6.2E-03
1.4E-03
2.2E-05
1.2E-04
4.2E-04
7.4E-02
5.6E-03
4.3E-03
6.3E-02
4.0E-03
1.5E-03
8.5E-03
3.3E-04
3.7E-02
1.1E+01
4.3E-03
4.3E-03
2.6E-02
8.2E-05
4.3E-03
4.3E-03
8.2E-05
4.3E-03
3.4E-04
9.8E-02
1.8E-02
1.5E-02
8.2E-05
4.3E-03
2.9E-01
2.8E-02
8.2E-05
4.3E-03
8.2E-05
8.2E-06
6.4E-02
, 1.9E-01
4.0E+00
2.0E-03
5.3E-HH)
1.8E-01
5.2E+00
2.8E-05
2.7E-02
, POTW
Removal
Factor
1.6E-01
5.0E-02
1.1E-01
6.0E-02
8.0E-02
1.2E-01
4.6E-01
- 1.5E-01
4.0E-02
l.OE-01
1.3E-01
1.0E400
3.5E-01
5.0E-02
1.9E-01
4:OE-02 '
4.0E-01
2.9E-01
9.1E-01
3.0E-01
1.2E-01
5.0E-02
8.0E-02
2.9E-01
2-9E-01 *
1.6E-01
7.2E-01
7.2E-01
5.0E-02
2.9E-01
2.9E-01
9.0E-02
5.0E-02
2.9E-01
2.9E-01
, • 2.9E-01
5.3E-01
1.2E-01
4.4E-01
l.OE-HM)
- 6.4E-01
5.4E-01
7.7E-01
l.OE-01
4.5E-01
3.3E-01
Pound Equivalents
Removed
Option 1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0 '
1.6
0.0
0^4
0.0
0:0
o.o
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.6
0.1
0.0
0.0
. 0.0
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0,0
0.2
0.0
1.3
0.0
0.2
11.8
0.2
0.0
0.0
,A-15
-------
TABLE A-8 (continued)
POLLUTANT REMOVALS
TRUCK PETROLEUM SUBCATEGORY
INDIRECT DISCHARGERS
Conversion Factors
Chemical
Cobalt
Copper
Hcxivalcnt Chromium
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
Phosphorus
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Sulfur
Tantalum
Thallium
Tin
Titanium
Tungsten
Vanadium
Zinc
Zirconium
Fluoride
Total Cyanide
Total
Pollutants
Removed (grams)
Option 1
546
11,839
1,900
160,398
8,332
39,177
4,160
2
1,429
42,143
2,360
4,901
18
132
1,864,821
6,314
67
6
685
324
181
193
11,674
11
38,859
48
3,203,208
Grams/
Pounds
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21Er03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
Toxic
Weighting
Factors
1.1E-01
4.7E-01
5.1E-01
5.6E-03
1.8E+00
8.7E-04
1.4E-02
5.0E+02
2.0E-01
3.6E-02
aCE+00
1.1E-03
1.1E+00
4.7E-01
5.5E-06
5.6E-06
6.0E-02
1.4E-01
3.0E-01
2.9E-02
5.3E-03
6.2E-01
5.1E-02
5.4E-01
3.5E-02
1.1E+00
POTW
Removal
Factor
6.3E-01
1.6E-01
9.4E-01
1.7E-01
8.0E-02
7.4E-01
5.9E-01
4.0E-01
4.8E-01
4.9E-01
3.1E-01
8.0E-01
5.4E-01
2.2E-01
4.5E-01
8.8E-01
4.5E-01
7.3E-01
3.5E-01
3.1E-01
4.5E-01
5.7E-01
2.2E-01
l.OE+00
3.9E-01
3.0E-01
Pound Equivalents
Removed
Option 1
0.1
2.0
2.0
0.3
2.7
0.1
0.1
0.7
0.3
1.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.3
0.0
1.2
0.0
28.2
Note: Pound Equivalent Removals are rounded to the nearest 0.1 pounds.
A-16
-------
TABLE A-9
POLLUTANT REMOVALS
RAIL PETROLEUM SUBCATEGORY
INDIRECT DISCHARGERS
Conversion Factors
Chemical
Acetone
Benzene
1 ,2-Dichlorbethane
Ethylbenzene
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methyl isobutyl ketone
Methylene chloride
Tetrachloroethylene -
Toluene
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethylene
Vinyl Acetate ,
m-Xylene
o+p-Xylene
Benzoic acid
Biphenyl
bis (2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate
4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol
ri-Decane
Diphenyl Ether
n-Docosane
n-Dodecane
n-Eicosane
n-Hexacosane •
n-Hexadecane
Hexanoic Acid
2-Isopropylnaphthalene
2-Methylnaphthalene
Naphthalene
n-Octacosane
n-Octadecane
Pentamethylbenzene
Phenol
n-Tetracosane
n-Tetradecane
n-Triacontane
Tripropyleneglycol Methyl Ether
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Boron
Cadmium
Calcium,
Chromium
Pollutants
Removed (grams)
Option 1
• 1,337
50
3
38
121
13
8
4
200
12
3
14
60
29
64
1
0
64
171
' 0
12
127
61
12 ,-
78
22
15
14
13
8
27 .
14
10
13
37
0
417
50
0 .
1
9
0
142
1
395
^5
Grams/
Pounds
2.21E-03
2.21 E-03
2.21 E-03
2.21 E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
. 2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21 E-03
2.21 E-03 ;
2.21 E-03
2.21 E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
• 2.21 E-03
2.21 E-03
2.21 E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21 E-03
2.21 E-03
2.21E-03
2:21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21 E-03
2.2 1 E-03
2.21 E-03
2.21 E-03
2.21E-03
2.21 E-03
2.21 E-03
2.21 E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21 E-03
2.21E-03
2.21 E-03
2.21 E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
Toxic
Weighting
Factor
7.6E-06
1.8E-02
6.2E-03
1.4E-03
2.2E-05
. 1.2E-04
4.2E-04
7.4E-02
5.6E-03
4.3E-03
6.3E-02
4.0E-03
1.5E-03
8.5E-03
3.3E-04
. 3.7E-02
1.1E-H)!
4.3E-03
4.3E-03
2.6E-02
8.2E-05
4.3E-03
4.3E-03
8.2E-05
4.3E-03
3.4E-04
9.8E-02
1.8E-02
1.5E-02
8.2E-05
4.3E-03 '
2.9E-01
2.8E-02
8.2E-05
4.3E-03
8.2E-05
8.2E-06
6.4E-02
1.9E-01
4.0E+00
2.0E-03
5.3E+00
1.8E-01
5.2E+00
2.8E-05
2.7E-02
POTW
Removal'
Factor
1.6E-01
5.0E-02
1.1E-01
6iOE-02
8.0E-02
1.2E-01
4.6E-01
1.5E-01 .
4.0E-02
l.OE-01
1.3E-01
l.OE+00
3.5E-01
5.0E-02
1.9E-01
4.0E-02
4.0E-01
2.9E-01
9.1E-01
3.0E-01
1.2E-01
- 5.0E-02
8.0E-02
2.9E-01
2.9E-01
1.6E-01
7.2E-01
7.2E-01
5.0E-02
2.9E-01
2.9E-01
9.0E-02
5.0E-02
2.9E-01
-.. 2.9E-01
2.9E-01
5.3E-01
1.2E-Q1
4.4E-01
l.OE+00
6.4E-01
5.4E-01
7.7E-01
l.OE-01
4.5E-01
3.3E-01
Pound Equivalents
Removed
Option 1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
. 0.6
. 0.0
• o.o
0.0
J3.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
, 0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Q.O
0.0
0.0
. ,0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
A-17
-------
TABLE A-9 (continued)
POLLUTANT REMOVALS
RAIL PETROLEUM SUBCATEGORY
INDIRECT DISCHARGERS
• ; ' Conversion Factors
Chemical
Cobalt
Copper
Hcxivalcnt Chromium
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mmganesc
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
phosphorus
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Sulfur
Tantalum
Thallium
Tin
Titanium
Tungsten
Vanadium
Zinc
Zirconium
Fluoride
Total Cyanide
Total
Pollutants
Removed (grams)
Option 1
2
43
7
587
31
143
15
0
5
154
9
18
0
0
6,830
23
0
•o
3
1
1
1
43 ,
0
142
0
11,732
Grams/
Pounds
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
Toxic
Weighting
Factor
1.1E-01
4.7E-01
5.1E-01
5.6E-03
1.8E+00
8.7E-04
1.4E-02
5.0E+02
2.0E-01
3.6E-02
O.OE+00
1.1E-03
1.1E+00
4.7E-01
5.5E-06 .
5.6E-06
6.0E-02
1.4E-01
3.0E-01
2.9E-02
5.3E-03 ,
6.2E-01
5.1E-02
5.4E-01
3.5E-02
1.1E+00
POTW
Removal
Factor
6.3E-01
1.6E-01
9.4E-01
1.7E-01
8.0E-02
7.4E-01
5.9E-01
4.0E-01
4.8E-01
4.9E-01
• 3.1E-01
8.0E-01
5.4E-01
2.2E-01
4.5E-01
8.8E-01
4.5E-01
7.3E-01
3.5E-01
3.1E-01
4.5E-01
5.7E-01
2.2E-01
l.OE+00
3.9E-01
3.0E-01
Pound Equivalents
Removed
Option 1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
o.o
0.0
0.0
0.1
Note; Pound Equivalent Removals are rounded to the nearest 0.1 pounds.
A-18
-------
TABLE A-10
POLLUTANT REMOVALS
TRUCK FOOD SUBCATEGORY
INDIRECT DISCHARGERS
' Conversion Factors
Pollutants Removed (grams)
Chemical
Benzoic acid
Hexanoic Acid
Phenol
Total
Option 1
' 23,557
532,692
2,491
558,740
Option 2
2,072,585,949
48,275,577,659
213,126,140
.' 50,561,289,748
Grams/
Ppunds
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
Toxic
Weighting
Factor
3.30E-04
3.40E-04
2.80E-02
POTW
Removal
Factor
1.90E-01
1.60E-01
5.00E-02
Pound Equivalents
Removed
Option 1
0.0
0.1
. Olo'
0.1
Option 2
287.2
5,803.9
659.4
6,750.5
Note: Pound Equivalent Removals are rounded to the nearest 0.1 pounds.
A-19
-------
TABLE A-I1
POLLUTANT REMOVALS
RAIL FOOD SUBCATEGORY
INDIRECT DISCHARGERS
Conversion Factors
Pollutants Removed (grams)
Chemical
Dcoroic acid
Kexxnoic Acid
Phenol
Total
Option 1
ND
ND
ND
"I
ND
Option 2
ND
ND
ND
• ND
; Grams/
Pounds
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
Toxic
Weighting
Factor
3.30E-04
3.40E-04
2.80E-02
POTW
Removal
Factor
1.90E-01
1.60E-01
5.00E-02
Pound Equivalents
Removed
Option 1
ND
ND
ND
ND
Option 2
ND
ND
ND
ND
Note: Pound Equivalent Removals are rounded to the nearest 0.1 pounds.
ND; Not disclosed due to business confidentiality.
A-20
-------
TABLE A-12
POLLUTANT REMOVALS
BARGE FOOD SUBCATEGORY
INDIRECT DISCHARGERS
Conversion Factors
Pollutants Removed (grams)
Chemical
Benzole acid
Hexanoic Acid -
Phenol
Total
Option 1
ND
ND
ND
ND
Option 2
ND
ND
ND
ND
Grams/
Pounds
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
Toxic
Weighting
Factor
3.30E-04
3.40E-04
2.80E-02
POTW
Removal
Factor
i;90E-01 '
1.60E-01
5.00E-02
Pound Equivalents
Removed
Option 1
ND
ND
ND
ND
Option 2
ND
ND
ND
ND
Note: Pound Equivalent Removals are rounded to the nearest 0.1 pounds.
ND: Not disclosed due to business confidentiality.
A-21
-------
Total
TABLE A-13
POLLUTANT REMOVALS
TRUCK HOPPER SUBCATEGORY
INDIRECT DISCHARGERS
Chemical
Aluminum
Beryllium
Calcium
Chromium
Iron
Manganese
Titanium
Zinc
Pollutants
Removed
(grams)
Option 1
39,775
18
599,274
49
236,812
7,125
1,512
559
Conversion Factors
Grams/
Pounds
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
Toxic
Weighting
Factor
6.40E-02
5.30E+00
2.80E-05
2.70E-02
5.60E-03
1.40E-02
2.90E-02
5.10E-02
POTW ,
Removal
Factor
1.20E-01
5.40E-01
4.50E-01
3.30E-01
1.70E-01
5.90E-01
3.10E-01
2.20E-01
Pound
Equivalents
Removed
Option 1
0.7
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.5
0.1
0.0
0.0
885,123
1.5
Note: Pound Equivalent Removals are rounded to the nearest 0.1 pounds.
A-22
-------
TABLE A-14
POLLUTANT REMOVALS
RAIL HOPPER SUBCATEGORY
INDIRECT DISCHARGERS
Chemical
Aluminum
Beryllium
Calcium
Chromium
Iron (
Manganese
Titanium
Zinc
Total
Pollutants
Removed
(grams)
Option 1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Conversion Factors
Grams/
Pounds
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
Toxic
Weighting
Factor
; 6.40E-02
5.30E+00
2.80E-05
2.70E-02
5.60E-03
1.40E-02
2.90E-02
5.10E-02
POTW
Removal
Factor
1.20E-01
5.40E-01
4.50E-01
3.30E-01
1.70E-01
5.90E-01
3.10E-01
2.20E-01
Pound
Equivalents
Removed
Option 1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Note: Pound Equivalent Removals are rounded to the nearest 0.1 pounds.
ND: Not disclosed due to business confidentiality.
. A-23
-------
TABLE A-15
POLLUTANT REMOVALS
BARGE HOPPER SUBCAT EGORY
DIRECT DISCHARGERS
Chemical
Aluminum
Beryllium
Calcium
Chromium
Iron
Manganese
Titanium
Zinc
Total
Pollutants
Removed
(grams)
Option 1
50,865
22
773,702
79
302,141
9,125
1,913
720
1,138,567
Conversion
Grams/
Pounds
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03 .
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
Factors
Toxic
Weighting
Factor
6.40E-02
5.30E+00
2.80E-05
2.70E-02
5.60E-03
1.40E-02
2,90E-02
5.10E-02
Pound
Equivalents
Removed
Option 1
7.2
0.3
0.0
0.0
3.7
0.3
0.1
0.1
11.7
Note: Pound Equivalent Removals are rounded to the nearest 0.1 pounds.
A-24
-------
TABLE A-16
POLLUTANT REMOVALS
BARGE HOPPER SUBCATEGORY
INDIRECT DISCHARGERS
Chemical .
Aluminum
Beryllium
Calcium
Chromium
Iron
Manganese
Titanium
Zinc
Total
Pollutants
Removed
(grams)
Option 1
3,950
1
86,820
25
20,903
759
76
76
112,609
Conversion Factors
: Grams/
Pounds
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
Toxic
Weighting
Factor
6.40E-02
5.30E+00
2.80E-05
2.70E-02
5.60E-03
1.40E-02
2.90E-02
5.10E-02
POTW
Removal
Factor
1.20E-01
5.40E-01
4.50E-01
3.30E-01
1.70E-01
5.90E-01
3.10E-01
2.20E-01
Pound
Equivalents
Removed
Option 1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
Note: Pound Equivalent Removals are rounded to the nearest 0.1 pounds.
A-25
-------
A-26
-------
APPENDIX B
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION FOR
COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS:
BASELINE POLLUTANT DISCHARGES IN
POUNDS AND POUND EQUIVALENTS
B-l
-------
B-2
-------
Ed
5
H
V&H
Z
HH
.J
W^^
"
<
»
Q
O
%
B'
U
cc
N"^
Q . ' •
UTANTS
TOTALS
Jg
O H'
^^ ^-^
3«
S Z
0~
(•M
u
o
z
o
z
o
eu
^
' w
%
-t— •
c
cd
. . ^
• I-N
3
w
•o
1
^2
^
1
3
- o
H
' .
Q
QJ
• i3
'"rt
CH '
, ^
2
S
•4— »
•*— »
^_J
1
t3
-Q
o
ec
"' 1
GO
OO
1 oo
oo"
in
. '
t--
Os
- O
CS
in
ro
'
in
>n"
oo
oo
co^
m"
Os
OO
CO
Os
co*
Os
oo
• %
oo^
*
*rt
u
• 1~4
•§
6
•a
S
p >n
F^ vo
vo" •*"
CO »•""
rt Tl"
co O
«— i CO
in^ — -> .
in
co
in co
vo m
2"'
os oo
r- -T"
r~- os
o" r~"
in •*
cs
oo cs
O~ oo"
in i-i'
S|
oC
cs
cs
* -a'
Rail Chemical
Barge Chemic
cs
00
cs
oo
cs
1
OS
r-~
Os
t~-
p.
t-T
i
£
u
1
p-l
H
^ •
o
•*-* .
p
£'
vo
cs
>VP
1
-
i
co 'in oo
O vo cs
in co --i
.vo" ~*
.
co in bo
O vo' cs
m co •— i
t~~ Os
VO —
2$$.'
OO CO OO
cs rr r.T.. (£
g na S3
C Clj . 03 •
t> O
cs o
t--. p
cs' p
,
"^
'$.&.
t~- CO
CS "*
P~ CO
cs •*
^^
2%
Truck Hopper
Rail Hopper
o
cs
cs
oo
0
cs
cs
<
CO
00
VO
vo" -
OS
5
f— t
rj-
CO
in"
Barge Hopper
p' ' •
in
r-."
*"?
r-;
^3"
oo
vp^
vo
OS
co
CO
cs'
r-
cs
^j-
t--
in"
^«»
r~-
o
Os"
I —
i"
«\
VO.
CO
cs
'
'
Industry Total
flj
'.&
CQ
c
c
.2
en
J3
CT
53
1
1 "•
;g
"c
0
•o
o
-ti
§
;ers were id
a1
6?J
^3
1
"3
t>
e-
•3
3
1
S
.£?
'53
S
H
!
"i
"3
^JJ
0 S
U CQ
* Pollutants dir
NA: Not applic
B-3
-------
TABLE B-2
BASELINE NONCONVENTIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGES
•TRUCK CHEMICAL SUBCATECORY
DIRECT DISCHARGERS
Conversion Factors
: , Pollutants
Discharged
at Baseline
Chemical (grams)
Acetone
Benzene
Chloroform
1,2-Dichloroethane
Ethylbenzene
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methyl isobutyl ketone
Methylene chloride
Tetrachioroethylene
Toluene
1 , 1 , 1 -Trichlorpethane
Trichloroethylenc
m-Xylene
o-fp-Xylene . '
alpha-Terpineol
Bcnzoic acid
Benzyl alcohol
bis (2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate
2-Chlorophenol
o-Cresol
p-Cresol
p-Cymene
n-Decane
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene
Di-n-octyl phthalate
n-Docosane
n-Dodccane
n-Eicosane
n-Hexacosane
n-Hexadecane
2-IsopropyInaphthalcne
2-Mcthylnaphthalene
Naphthalene
n-Octadecanc
Styrene
n-Tetracosane
n-Tetradecane
n-Triacontane
Azinphos ethyl
Azinphos methyl
Coumaphos
Dichlofenthion
Disulfoton
EPN
Lcptophos
139,244.2
5.8
102.9
716.9
, 336.3
8,345.3
9,508.9
99,646.9
589.6
579.7
593.7
809.4
589.6
589.6
589.5
125,488.9
1,143.1
263.1
783.5
785.3
795:9
196.6
47.2
589.5 '
589.5
171.0
76.7
351.0
589.5
50.1
589.5
141.5
57.3
100.2
787.3
589.5
23.6
589.5
117.9
294^8
294.8
117.9
206.3
117.9
117.9
Grams/
Pounds
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03 s
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.2iE-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
Pound
Toxic , . Equivalents
Weighting Discharged
Factor at Baseline
7.60E-06
1.80E-02
2.10E-03
6.20E-03
1.40E-03
2.20E-05
1.20E-04
4.20E-04
7.40E-02
5.60E-03
4.30E-03 '"
6.30E-02
1.50E-03
8.50E-03
l.OOE-03 >
3.30E-04 '
5.60E-03
1.10E-01
3.30E-02
3.30E-03
2.40E-03
4.30E-02
4.3QE-03
1.10E-02
2.20E-01
8.20E-05
4.30E-03
4.30E-03
8.20E-05
4.30E-03 '
9.80E-02
1.80E-02
1.50E-02
4.30E-03
1.40E-02
8.20E-05
430E-03
8.20E-05
5.10E+03
2.80E+01
5.60E+03
1.40E+01
1.20E+02
7.60E+02
•l.lOE+01
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
0.0
, 0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1,328.9
18.2
3,648.1
3.6
54.7
198.6
2.9
B-4
-------
TABLE B-2 (continued)
BASELINE NONCONVENTIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGES
TRUCK CHEMICAL SUBCATEGORY
DIRECT DISCHARGERS
'' '. . ••
Chemical
Merphos
Tetrachlorvinphos
Beta-BHC
Gamma-BHC
Gamma-Chlordane
Chlorobenzilate
4,4'-DDT
Diallate
Dieldrin
Endosulfan II
Endosulfan Sulfate
Nitrofen
Pentachloronitrobenzene
Simazine
Terbuthylazine
2,4-D
Dalapon
2,4-DB (Butoxon)
Dinoseb • • '
MCPA
' MCPP
Picloram -
2,4,5-T
2,4,5-TP
Aluminum
Boron -
Chromium
Copper
Manganese
Mercury
Tin
Titanium
Zinc
Fluoride
Total Cyanide
Total
Pollutants .
Discharged
at Baseline
(grams)
1 17.9
117.9
5.9
6.3
2.9
59.0
5.9
274.0
2,4
59.0
5.9
11.8
2.9
471.6
294.8
249.5
2.4
117.9
182.6
21,484.3
4,480.5
29.5
59.9
29.5
11,496.3
16,065.0
1,147.9
5,103.4
12,282.1
12.4
381,824.8
1,124.3
672.1
1,081.7
629.0
857,829
(1,896 pounds)
Conversion
Grams/
Pounds
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21 E-03
2.21 E-03
2.21E-03 ,
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03.
. 2.21E-03
2.21E-03 '
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21 E-03
2.21 E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
. 2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21 E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21 E-03
-• 2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
Factors
Toxic
Weighting
Factor
2.50E+01
1.40E-01
1.20E+01
7.00E+01
2.30E+03
1.60E-01--
6.50E+03
8.40E-03
5.70E+04
l.OOE+02
l.OOE+02
. - 4.805-02
2.70E-01
5.60E-01
1.20E-02
3.10E-03
5.10E-03
3.60E-02
1.90E+00
1.60E-02
6.90E-03
2.10E+00
2.80E-01
. ' 1.80E-01
6.40E-02
1.80E-01
2.70E-02
4.70E-01
1.40E-02
5.QOE+02
3.00E-01
2.90E-02
5.10E-02
3.50E-02
1.10E+00
Pound
Equivalents
Discharged
at Baseline ,
6.5
0.0
0.2
1.0
15.0
0.0
84.7
0.0
297.1
13.0
1.3
0.0
0.0
0.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.8
0.8
,0.1
, : o.i .
0.0
0.0
1.6
6.4
0.1
5.3
0.4
13.7
253.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
1.5
5,959.1
Note: Pound Equivalent Discharges are rounded to the nearest 0.1 pounds.
B-5
-------
TABLE B-3
BASELINE NONCQNVENTIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGES
TRUCK CHEMICAL SUBCATEGORY
INDIRECT DISCHARGERS
Conversion Factors
Chemical
Acetone
Benzene
Chloroform
1 ,2-Dich!oroethane
Ethylbcnzene
Meihy] ethyl ketone
Methyl isobutyl ketone
Methylene chloride
Tetrachlorocthylene
Toluene
1 , 1 , 1 -Trichloroethane
Trichloroethylene
m-Xylene
o+p-Xylene
alpha-Terpineol
Benzole acid
Benzyl alcohol
bi| (2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate
2-Chlorophenol
o-Cresol
p-Cresol
p-Cymene
n-Dccanc
1 ,2-Dichlorobcnzenc
Di-n-ocryl phthalate
n-Docosane
n-Dodccane
n-Eicosanc
n-Hexacosanc
n-Hcxadecanc
2-Isopropylnaphthalenc
2-Methylnaphthalene
Naphthalene
n-Octadccane
Stytcnc
n-Tctracosanc
n-Tctradecane
n-Triacontane
Azinphos ethyl
Azinphos methyl
Coumaphos
Dichlofcnthion
Disulfoton
EPN
Lcptophos
Pollutants
Discharged
at Baseline
(grams)
96,442,328
85,882
171,522
1,093,205
942,392
17,338,690
5,285,811
31,527,325
2,076,223
3,638,316
1,347,806
52,142
3,737,758
1,961,522
797,114
80,202,259
500,434
915,812
123,022
145,472
238,831
122,727
628,812
186,160
309,430
197,367
1,973,579
549,214
264,605
1,245,164
331,843
135,731
556,528
684,844
6,712,512
326,240
852,940
387,875
7,609
12,428
16,645
7,015
49,838
10,337
12,578
Toxic
Grams/ Weighting
Pounds Factor
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21 E-03
2il E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21 E-03
2.21 E-03
2.21E-03
2.21 E-03
2.21E-03
2.21 E-03
2.21 E-03
2.21 E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21 E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21 E-03
2.21 E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21 E-03
. 2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21 E-03
2.21E-03
7.60E-06
1.80E-02
2.10E-03
6.20E-03 •
1.40E-03
2.20E-05
1.20E-04
4.20E-04
7.40E-02
5.60E-03
4.30E-03
6.30E-02
1.50E-03
8.50E-03
l.OOE-03
3.30E-04
5.60E-03
1.10E-01
3.30E-02
3.30E-03
2.40E-03
4.30E-02
4.30E-03
1.10E-02
2.20E-01
8.20E-05
4.30E-03
4.3QE-03
8iOE-05
4.30E-03
9.80E-02
1.80E-02
1.50E-02
4.30E-03
1.40E-02
8.20E-05
4.30E-03
8.20E-05
5.10E+03
2.80E+01
5.60E+03
1.40E+01
1.20E+02
7.60E+02
1.10E+01
POTW
Removal
Factor
1.63E-01
5.24E-02
2.66E-01
1.10E-01
6.21E-02
8.17E-02
1.21E-01
4.57E-01
1.54E-01
3.82E-02
9.55E-02
1.30E-01 '
3.46E-01
4.93E-02
5.40E-02
1.95E-01
2.20E-01
4.02E-01
5.00E-02
4.75E-01
2.83E-01
2.10E-03
9.10E-01
1..10E-01
1.70E-01
1.20E-01
4.95E-02
7.60E-02
2.89E-01
2.89E-01
7.20E-01
7.20E-01
5.31E-02
2.89E-01
6.35E-02
2.89E-01
2.89E-01
2.89E-01
l.OOE+00
2.60E-01
.OOE+00
.OOE+00
.OOE+00
.OOE+00
.OOE+00
Pound
Equivalents
Discharged
at Baseline
0.3
0.2
0.2
1.6
0.2
0.1
0.2
13.4,
52.3'
1.7
1.2
0.9
4.3
1.8
0.1
11.4
1.4
89.5
0.4
0.5
0.4
0.0
5.4
0.5
25.6
0.0
0.9
0.4
0.0
3.4
51.7
3.9
1.0
1.9
13.2
0.0
2.3
0.0
85,761.1
200.0
205,996.7
217.1
13,217.1
17,361.5
305.8
B-6
-------
TABLE B-3 (continued)
BASELINE NONCONVENTIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGES
TRUCK CHEMICAL SUBCATEGORY
INDIRECT DISCHARGERS
Conversion Factors ' •••
Chemical
Merphos
Tetrachlorvinphos '
Beta-BHC
Gamma-BHC
Garrima-Chlordane
Chlorobenzilate
4,4'-DDT
Diallate
Dieldrin
Endosulfan II
Endpsulfan Sulfate
Nitrofen
Pentachloronitrobenzene
Simazine
Terbuthylazine
2,4-D
Dalapon
2,4-DB (Butoxon)
Dinoseb
MCPA
MCPP
Picloram
2,4,5-T
2,4,5-TP
Aluminum
Boron
Chromium
Copper
Manganese
Mercury
Tin
Titanium
Zinc
Fluoride
Total Cyanide
Total
Pollutants
Discharged
at Baseline
(grams)
7,368
6,255
853
772
410
8,651
741
48,621
319
7,410 •
741
1,538
13,510
66,001
37,608
8,445
3,t)71
19,596
6,842
' 1,607,248
451,233
2,696
2,497
1,598
12,419,050
10,856,556
3,386,535 •
528,289
718,880
2,989
40,092,193
350,047
1,023,506
68,344,188
63,128
404,295,270 .
(893,493 pounds)
Grams/
Pounds
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21 E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03 .
- '2.21 E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21 E-03
2.21E-03 '
2.21E-03
2.21 E-03
2.21 E-03
.., 2.21E-03
2.21 E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.2} E-03
2.21 E-03 .
2.21E-03
2.21 E-03
2.21E-03
2.21 E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21 E-03
2.21 E-03
2.21 E-03
Toxic
Weighting'
Factor
2.50E+01
1.40E-01
1.20E+01
7.00E+01
2.30E+03
1.60E-01
6.50E+03
8.40E-03
5.70E+04
l.OOE+02
l.OOE+02
4.80E-02
2.70E-01
5.60E-01
1.20E-02
3.10E-03
5.10E-03
3.60E-02
1.90E+00
1.60E-02
6.90E-03
2.10E+00
2.80E-01
1.80E-01
6.40E-02
1.80E-01
2.70E-02
4.70E-01
'-. 1.40E-02
5.00E+02
3.00E-01
2.90E-02
5.10E-02
3.50E-02
1.10E+00
POTW
Removal
Factor
l.OOE+00
l.OOE+00
5.70E-01
4.80E-01
5.00E-01
l.OOE+00
4.00E-01
l.OOE+00
1.40E-01
5.00E-01
4.20E-01
.OOE+00
. .OOE+00
.OOE+00
.OOE+00
5.10E-01
.OOE+00
.OOE+00
.OOE+00
.OOE+00
.OOE+00
.OOE+00
4.40E-01
5.60E-01
1.20E-01-
7.70E-01
3.30E-01
1.60E-01
5.90E-01
4.00E-01
3.50E-01
3.12E-01
2.20E-01
. 3.90E-01
2.96E-01
Pound
Equivalents
Discharged
at Baseline
407.1
1.9
12.9
57.4
1,041.3
3.1
4,257.6
0.9
5,622.3
818.8
68.8
0.2
8.1
81.7
1.0
0.0
0.0
1.6
28.7
56.8
. ,6'9
. 12.5
0,7
. 0.4
210.8
3,325.4
66.7
87.8
13.1
1,321.0
9,303.4
7.0
25.4
2,061.7
45.4
352,309.7
Note: Pound Equivalent Discharges are rounded to the nearest 0.1 pounds.
B-7
-------
TABLE B-4
BASELINE NONCONVENTIONAL ppLLUTANT DISCHARGES
RAIL CHEMICAL SUBCATEGORY
DIRECT DISCHARGERS
' , Conversion Factors ' . ,.
" ' '" • , ' , :
Chemical
Acetone
; ; Ethylbenzene
Methyl ethyl ketone
m-Xylene
o+p-Xylene
:, Anthracene
Benzoic acid
Biphenyl
Caibazole
p-Cresol
„ 2,4-Diaminotoluene
n-Docosane
n-Dodecane
n-Eicosane
Fluoranthene
n-Hexacosane
n-Hexadecane
2-Methylnaphthalene
1 -Methylphenanthrene
Naphthalene
n-Octacosane
n-Octadecane
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Pyrene
Styrene
n-Tetracosane
:i' " ' „, , n-Tettadecane
n-Triacontane
HI, ,» ' ' , , „
Dioxathion
Tetiachlorvinphos
Tokuthion
Trichlorfbn
Trichloronate
Trimethylphosphate
Acephate
Alachlor
Atiazine
; Benefluralin
; ,{ "•; , , . „ AIpha-BHC
Beta-BHC
I ; "" " i ' belta-BHC
• ' . , ' „ „ , , Ganima-BHC '
Bromicil
Bromoxyni! octanoate
Butachlor
Caplafol
Captan
; Caibophenothion
Alpha-Chlordane
Gamma-Chlordane
Chlorobenzilate
Chloroneb
Dacthal (DCPA)
4.4--DDD
Pollutants
Discharged at
Baseline
(grams)
58
7
314
14
17
240
228
51
203
85
3,330 t
156
99
488,
"222 "
277
'''362
44
179
7
165
440
481
,,98
174
1
462
118
172
14
4
6
14
4
6
-1,369
0
174
4
0
54
" 1
1 "
2 "
'l
1
4
2
2
0
0
- . 2
41
1
0
Grams/
Pounds
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21 E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21 E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21 E-03
2.21E-03
241E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21 E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
'2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.2IE-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21 E-03
2.21E-03
2.21 E-03
2.21 E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21 E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21 E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.2 1 E-03 .
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
B-8
Toxic
Weighting
Factor
7.60E-06
1.40E-03
2.20E-05
1.50E-03
8.50E-03
2.50E+00
3.30E-04
3.70E-02
2.70E+01
2.40E-03
1.80E-01
8.20E-05
4.30E-03
4.30E-03
9.20E-01
8.20E-05
4.30E-03
1.80E-02
1.40E-01
1.50E-02
8.20E-OS
4.30E-03
1.90E+01
2.80E-02
7.50E-02,
1.40E-02
8.20E-05
4.30E-03
8.20E-05
6.22E+01
1.40E-01
9.30E-03
7.00E+02
5.60E+03
1.90E-03
1.30E^02
1.60E-02
9.40E-02
1.60E-01
4.30E+01
1.20E+01
8.60E-02
7.00E+01
5160E-03
1.10E+00
7.40E-03
2.70E+00
1.60E+00
6.60E-01
2.30E+03
2.30E+03
L60E-01
4.70E-03
9.SOE-03
7.60E+02
'i -, .' ,•
Pound
Equivalents
Discharged
at Baseline
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.3
0.0
0.0
12.1
0.0
1.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
20.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0 ;
0.0
1.9
0.0
0.0
21.8
48.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.4
0.0
0.1
0-0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.9
0.8
.0.0
0.0
0.0
0.7
-------
TABLE B-4 (continued)
BASELINE NONCONVENTIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGES
RAIL CHEMICAL SUBCATEGORY
DIRECT DISCHARGERS
r ' Conversion Factors
Chemical
4,4'-DDE
4,4'-DDT
Diallate
Dichlone
Dicofol
Dieldrin
Endosulfan I
Endosulfan Sulfate
Endrin "
Endrin aldehyde
Endrin ketone
Ethalfluralin
Etradiazole
Fenarimol
Heptachlor epoxide
Isodrin
Isopropalin
Methoxychlor
Metribuzin
Mirex
Nitrofen
Pendamethalin
Pentachlbronitrobenzene
CIS-Pennethrin
Perthane
Propacblor
Propazine
Simazine
Strobane
Terbacil
Terbuthylazine
Triadimcfon
Trifluralin
2,4-D
Dalapon .
2,4-DB (Butoxon)
Dicamba
Dichloroprop
Dinoscb
MCPA
MCPP
Picloram
2,4,5-T
,2,4,5-TP
Aluminum
Barium '
Chromium
Copper
Titanium '
Zinc
Fluoride
Total
Pollutants
Discharged at
Baseline
(grams)
'0
0
592
2
3
3
0
. 0
0
1
0
8
0
1
.0
0"
1
1
. 0
1
2
. 1
0
9
81
26
28
49,949
96
41
4,255
2
3
118
28 '
203
888 '
. 115
' . - - 50
4,255
59V199
37
20
20
25,118
1,472
103
208
235
961
4,682
163,023
Grams/
Pounds
2.21E-03
2.21E:03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
/2.21E-03
2.2IE-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
, 2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
- 2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
Toxic
Weighting
Factor
9.50E+02
6.50E-H)3
8.40E-03
4.00E+01
S.70E+02
• 5.70E+04
l.OOE+02
l.OOE+02
9.80E+01
9.80E+01
9.80E+01
7.50E+00
4.60E-03
6.20E-02
6.80E+03
1.40E+01
5.80E-01
1.90E+02
1.30E-03
5.60E+03
4.80E-02
1.50E-01
2.70E-01 '
3.40E+00
1.40E+01
3.30E-01
4.70E-03
5.60E-01
1.10E+02
8.00E-01
1.20E-02
5.80E-03
4.20E+00
3.10E-03
5.10E-03
3.60E-02
1.50E-02
9.30E-02
.1.90E+00
1.60E-02
6.90E-03
2.10E+00
2.80E-01
1.80E-01
6.40E-02
2.00E-03
• 2.70E-02
4.70E-01
2.90E-02
5.10E-02
3.50E-02
Pound
Equivalents
Discharged
at Baseline
0.6
6.9
0.0
0.2
3.5
419.5
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
4.2
0.0
0.0
0-2
0.0
17.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
O.I
2.5
0.0
pe 0.0
61.8
23.4
1 0.1
0.1
0.0
6.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.2
0.9
0.2
0.0'
0.0
3.6
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.0
0.1
0.4
657.9
Note: Pound Equivalent Removals are rounded to the nearest 0.1 pounds.
B-9
-------
TABLE B-5
BASELINE NONCONVENTIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGES
RAiL CHEMicAL SUBCATECORY
INDIRECT DISCHARGERS
Conversion Factors
Chemical
Ethylbenzene
Methyl ethyl ketone
m-Xylene
d+p-Xylene
Anthracene
Benzole acid
Carbazole
p-Cresol
2,4-Diaminotoluene
n-Docosane
n-Dodecane
n-Eicosane
Fluoranthene
n-Hexacosane
n-liextdecane
1 -Iviethy Iphenanthrene
Naphthalene
n-Octacosane
n-Octadccanc
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Pyrene
Styrcne
n-Tetracosane
n-Tetradecane
n-Triacontane
Dioxathion
Tetrachlorvinphos
Tokuthion
Trichlorfon
Trichloronate
Trimethylphosphate
Acephate
Alachlor
Atrazine
Benefluralin
Alpha-BHC
Beta-BHC
Dclta-BHC
Gamma-BHC
Pollutants
Discharged at
Baseline
(grams)
32,167
114,008
70,800
46,852
36,487
. ' 879,737
30,963
15,385
569,614
81,843
102,159
319,690
33,406
43,405
645,916
27,585
19,634
26,475
379,599
73,736
156,926
26,189
49,647
71,662
435,146
28,482
2,068
654
877
2,151
600
960
217,802
71
29,747
445
35
8,008
129
91
Grams/
Pounds
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2-21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2T21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
Toxic
Weighting
Factor
1.40E-03
2.20E-05
1.50E-03
8.50E-03
2.50E+00
3.30E-04
2.70E-01
2.40E-03
1.80E-01
8.20E-05
4.30E-03
4.30E-03
9.20E-61
8.20E-05
4.30E-03
1.40E-01
1.50E-02
8.20E-05
4.30E-03
1.90E+01
. 2.80E-02
7.50E-02
1.40E-02
8.20E-05
4.30E-03
8.20E-05
6.22E+01
1.40E-01
9.30E-03
7.00E+02
, 5.6PE-HJ3
1.90E-03
1.30E-02
1.60E-02
9.40E-02
1.60E-Q1
4.30E+01
1.20E+01
2.80E-01
7.00E401
POTW
Removal
Factor
6.21E-02
8.17E-02
3.46E-01
4.93E-02
4.00E-02
1.95E-01
l.OOE+00
2.83E-01
l.OOE+00
1.20E-01
4.95E-02
7.60E-02
5.80E-01
2.89E-01
2.89E-01
5.00E-02
5.31E-02
2.89E-01 ,
2.89E-01
5.11E-02
4.75E-02
5.00E-02
6.35E-02
2.89E-01
2.89E-01
2.89E-01
l.OOE+00
.OOE+00
.OOE+00
.OOE+00
.OOE+00
.OOE+00
l.OOE+00
l.OOE+00
5.80E-01
l.OOE+00
3.60E-01
5.70E-01
l.OOE+00
4.80E-01
Pound
Equivalents
Discharged
at Baseline
Q.O
,0.0
0.1
0.0
8.1
0.1
18.5
0.0
226.6
0.0
0.0
0.2
39.4
0.0
1.8
0.4
0.0
0.0
1.0
158.2
0.5
0.2
0.1
0.0
1.2
0.0
284.3
0.2
0.0
3,327.6
7,425.0
0.0
6.3
o.o
3.6
0.2
1.2
121.0
0.1
6.8
B-10
-------
TABLE B-5 (continued)
BASELINE NONCONVENTIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGES
RAIL CHEMICAL SUBCATEGORY
INDIRECT DISCHARGERS
Conversion Factors
Chemical
Bromacil
Bromoxynil octanoate
Butachlor
Captafol
Captan
Carbophenothion
Alpha-Chlordane
Gamma-Chlordane
Chlorobenzilate
Chloroneb
Dacthal (DCPA)
4,4'-DDD
4,4'-DDE
4,4'-DDT
Diallate
Dichlone
Dicofol
.Dieldriri"
Endosulfan I
Endosulfan Sulfate
Endrin
Endrin aldehyde
Endrin ketone
Ethalfluralin
Etradiazole
Fenarimol
Heptachlor epoxide
Isodrin
Isopropalin
Methoxychlor
Metribuzin
Mirex
Nitrofen
Pendamethalin
Pentachloronitrobenzene
CIS-Permethrin
Perthane
Propachlor
Propazine
Simazine
Pollutants
Discharged at
Baseline
(grams)"
336
168
137
540
. 338
284
,28
. - 23'
348
6,962
91
68
47
55
70,417
348
426
375
35
59
71
126
35-
1,329
47
90
38
45
.157
98
40
237
209
191
89
1,058
12,263
3,927
4,201
6,678,059
Grams/
Pounds
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
•2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
, 2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
. 2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
Toxic POTW
Weighting Removal
Factor Factor
5.60E-03 l.OOE+00
1.10E+00 l.OOE+00
7.40E-03 l.OOE+00
2.70E+00 l.OOE+00
1.60E+00 l.OOE+00
6.60E-01 l.OOE+00
2.30E+03 5.00E-01
2.30E+03 5.00E-01
1.60E-01 l.OOE+00
4.70E-03 l.OOE+00
9.50E-03 l.OOE+00
7:60E+02 l.OOE+00
9.50E+02 l.OOE+00
6.50E+03 4.00E-01
8.40E-03 l.OOE+00
4.00E+01 l.OOE+00
5.70E+02 l.OOE+00
5.70E+04 1.40E-01
l.OOE+02 5.00E-01
l.OOE+02 4.20E-01
9.80E+01 5.00E-01
9.80E+01
9.80E-01
7.50E+00
4.60E-03
6.20E-02
6.80E+03
1.40E+01
5.80E-01
1.90E+02
1.30E-03
5.60E+03
4.80E-02
1.50E-01
2.70E-01
. •
3.4QE+00
1.40E+01
3.30E-01
.OOE+00
.OOE+00
.OOE+00 ,
.OOE+00 .
.OOE+00
.OOE+00
.OOE+00
.OOE+00
4.20E-01
.OOE+00
.OOE+00
.OOE+00
.OOE+00
.OOE+00
.OOE+00
.OOE+00
.OOE+00
4.70E-03 l.OOE+00
5.60E-01 l.OOE+00
Pound
Equivalents
Discharged
at Baseline
0.0
0.4
0.0
3.2
- 1.2
0.4
71,2
59,0
0.1
0.1
0.0
113.9
99.7
314.5
1.3
30.8
537.3
6,609.7
3.8
5.4
7.7
27.3
•0.1
22.0
0.0
. ' 0.0
568.6
1-4
0.2
17.3
0.0
2,937.3
0.0
0.1
0.1
8.0
379.4
2.9
: 0.0
8,264.8
B-ll
-------
TABLE B-5 (continued)
BASELINE NONCONVENTIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGES
RAIL CHEMICAL SUBCATEGORY
INDIRECT DISCHARGERS
Conversion Factors
Chemical
Strobane
Terfaacil
Terbuthylazine
Triadimefon
Trifluralin
2,4-D
Dalapon
2,4-DB (Butoxon)
Dicamba
Dichloroprop
Dinoscb
JviCPA
MCPP
Picloram
2,4,S-T
2,4,5-TP
Aluminum
Barium
Chromium
Copper
Titanium
Zinc
Fluoride
Total
4 in
Pollutants
Discharged at
Baseline
(grams)
14,444
6,114
728,051
274
,273
12,400
' 4,213
22,522
67,164
14,445
5,003
404,082
5,222,382
6,343
2,170
1,722
3,796,352
147,364
24,499
19,440
17,754
79,744
852,497
22,813,796
(50,418 pounds)
Grams/
Pounds
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21 E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
Toxic
Weighting
Factor
1.10E+02
8.00E-01
1.20E-02
5.80E-03
4.20E+00
3.10E-03
5.10E-03
3.60E-02
1.50E-02
9.30E-02
1.90E+00
1.60E-02
6.90E-03
2.10E+00
2.80E-01
1.80E-01
6.40E-02
2.00E-03
2.70E-02
4.70E-01
2.90E-02
5.10E-02
3.50E-02
POTW
Removal
Factor
l.OOE+00
l.OOE+00
l.OOE+00
l.OOE+00
2.90E-01
5.10E-01
l.OOE+00
l.OOE+00
l.OOE+00
l.OOE+00
l.OOE+00
l.OOE+00
l.OOE+00
l.OOE+00
4.40E-01
5:60E-01
1.20E-01
6.40E-01
3.30E-01
1.59E-01
3.12E-01
2.20E-01
3.90E-01
Pound
Equivalents
Discharged
at Baseline
3,511.4
10.8
19.3
0.0
0.7
0.0
0.0
1.8
2.2
3.0
21.0.
14.3
79.6
29.4
0.6
0.4
64.4
0.4
0.5
3.2
0.4
2.0
25.7
35,513.1
Note: Pound Equivalent Discharges are rounded to the nearest 0.1 pounds.
B-12
-------
TABLE B-6
BASELINE NONCONVENTIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGES
BARGE CHEMICAL SUBCATEGORY
DIRECT DISCHARGERS
Conversion Factors
Chemical
Acetone
Acrylonitrile .
Benzene
Chloroform
Ethylbenzene
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methyl isobutyl ketone
Methylene chloride
Toluene
m-Xylene
o+p-Xylene
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Anthracene
2,3-Benzofluorene
Benzole acid
Biphenyl
bis (2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate
p-Cymene
n-Decane
3 ,6-Dimethylphenanthrene
Di-n-octyl phthalate
n-Docosane
n-Dodecane
n-Eicosane
Fluorene
n-Hexacosane
n-Hexadecane
1 -Methylfluorene
2-Methylnaphthalene
1 -Methylphenanthrene
Naphthalene
n-Octacosane
n-Octadecane
Pentamethylbenzene
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Pollutants
Discharged
at Baseline
(grams)
3,480,118
2^30,312
301,039
6,961
242,380
2,710,319
1,055,425
5,392
454,692
230,905
246,181
64,163
54,951
43,236
20,038
48,771
235,018
86,475
59,531
5,811,283
41,508
57,969
294,904
3,131,228
906,896
98,167
35,068
3,412,132
85,877
634,952
193,224
6,356,997
16,462
1,749,875 '
279,101
148,958
17,640
Toxic
Grams/ Weighting
Pounds Factors
2.21E-03
'' 2.21E-03
2.21E-03
.2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
, 2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
7.6E-06
8.5E-01
1.8E-02
2.1E-03 ;
1.4E-03
2.2E-05
1.2E-04
4.2E-04 '
5.6E-03
1.5E-03
8.5E-03
2.5E-01
8.4E-03
2.5E+00
2.2E-01
3.3E-04
3.7E-02
1.1E-01
4.3E-02
4.3E-03
4.7E-01
2.2E-01
8.2E-05
4.3E-03
4.3E-03
7.0E-01
8.2E-05
4.3E-03
8.9E-02
1.8E-02
1.4E-01
1.5E-02 .
8.2E-05
4.3E-03
2.9E-01
1.9E+01
2.8E-02
Pound r
Equivalents
Discharged
at Baseline
0.1
4,377.5
12.0
0.0
0.7
0.1
0.3
0.0
5.6
0.8
4.6
35.5
1.0
238.9
9.7
0.0
193.
21.0
5.7
55.2
43.1
28.2
0.1
29.8
8.6
151.9
0.0
32.4
16.9
.25.3
59.8
210.7
0.0
16.6
178.9
6,254.7
1.1
B-13
-------
TABLE B-6 (continued)
BASELINE NONCONVENf IONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGES
BARGE CHEMICAL SUBCATEGORY
DIRECT DISCHARGERS
'ifj
•i
Chemical
Pyrene
Styrene
n-Tetracosane
n-Tetradecane
Dalapon
Aluminum
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Hexavalent Chromium
Iron
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
Tantalum
Titanium
Zinc
Zirconium
Fluoride
Total
Pollutants
Discharged
at Baseline
(grams)
80,245
15,452,374
178,913
5,997,603
i.iio
2,075,445
165
6,008
31,410
149,326
9,978
41,201,903
55,349
334,530
465
60,115
174,650
61,691
3,581
2,322,950
4,294
472,593
103,622,849
(229,006 pounds)
Conversion
Grams/
Pounds
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
. 2.21E-03
2.21E-03
)'. .'.•••
Factors
Toxic
Weighting
Factors
7.5E-02
1.4E-02
8.2E-05
4.3E-03
5.1E-03
6.4E-02
5.3E+00
5.2E+00
2.7E-02
4.7E-01
5.1E-01
5.6E-03
'1.8E+00
1.4E-02
5.0E+02
2.0E-01
3.6E-02
6.0E-02
2.9E-02
5.1E-02
5.4E-01
3.5E-02
v
Pound
Equivalents
Discharged
at Baseline
13.3
478.1
0.0
57.0
0.0
293.6
1.9
69.0
1.9
155.1
11.2
509.9
220.2
10.4
514.0
26.6
13.9
8.2
0.2
261.8
5.1
36.6
14,534.1
Note: Pound Equivalent Discharges are rounded to the nearest 0.1 pounds.
B-14
-------
TABLE B-7
BASELINE NONCONVENTIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGES
BARGE CHEMICAL SUBCATEGORY
INDIRECT DISCHARGERS
Conversion Factors
Chemical
Acetone
Acrylonitrile
Benzene
Chloroform
Ethylbenzene
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methyl isobutyl ketone
Methylene chloride
Toluene
m-Xylene
o+p-Xylene
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Anthracene ,
2,3-Benzofluorene
Benzoic acid
Biphenyl
bis (2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate
p-Cymene
n-Decane
3,6-Dimethylphenanthrene ~~
Di-n-octyl phthalate
n-Docosane
n-Dodecane
n-Eicosane
Fluorene
n-Hexacosane
n-Hexadecane
l-Methylfluorene
2-Methylriaphthalene
1 -Methylphenanthrene
Naphthalene '
n-Octacosane
n-Octadecane
Pentamethylbenzene
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Pyrene
Styrene
n-Tetracosane
n-Tetradecane
Dalapon
Aluminum
Beryllium \
Cadmium
Pollutants
Discharged
at Baseline
(grams)
732,763
769,974
81,054
393
52,735
892,145
, 352,791
1,648
121,776
37,109
24,029
2,964
2,472
1,783
1,135
14,507 '
13,784
5,328
19,459
332,346
2,360
3,302
17,033
182,493
52,717
4,869
2,002
202,707
4,863
.40,533
10,948
405,285
948
101,357
15,805
7,712
4,633
3,890
1,054,021
10,152
368,833
182
118,230
9
, 229
Grams/
Pounds
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03'
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
. 2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2:21E-03"
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
Toxic
Weighting
Factors
7.60E-06
8.50E-01
"1.80E-02
2.10E-03
1.40E-03
2.20E-05
1.20E-04
4.20E-04
5.60E-03 -
1.50E-03
8.50E-03
2.50E-01
8.40E-03
2.50E+00
2.20E-01
3.30E-04
3.70E-02
1.10E-01 .
4.30E-02
4.30E-03
4.70E-01
2.20E-01
8.20E-05
4.30E-03
4.30E-03
7.00E-01
8.20E-05 ,
4.30E-03
8.90E-02
1.80E-02
1.40E-01
1.50E-02
8.20E-05
4.30E-03
2.90E-01
1.90E+01
2.80E-02
7.50E-02
1.40E-02
8.20E-05
4.30E-03
5.10E-03
6.40E-02
5.30E+00
5.20E+00
POTW
Removal
Factor
1.63E-01
5.00E-02
5.24E-02
2.66E-01
6.21E-02
'8.17E-02
1.21E-01
4.57E-01
3.82E-02
3.46E-01
4.93E-02
2.00E-02
5.00E-02
4.00E-02
3.00E-01
1.95E-01
4.00E-02
4.02E-01
l.OOE-02
9.10E-01
5.00E-02
1.70E-01
1.20E-01
4.95E-02
7.60E-02
3.00E-01
2.89E-01
2.89E-01
3.00E-01
7.20E-01
5.00E-02
5.31E-02
2.90E-01
2.89E-01
9.00E-02
5.00E-02
5.00E-02
5.00E-02
6.35E-02
2.89E-01
2.89E-01
l.OOE+00
1.20E-01
5.40E-01
l.OOE-01
Pound
Equivalents
Discharged
at Baseline
0.0
72.3
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.4
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.5
.0.0
2.9
0.1
0.3
0.0
i ai
0.0
2.3
0.0
0.6
0.3
1.2
0.2
0.7
0.0
0.3
0.9
16.2
0.0
0.0
2.1
0.0
1.0
0.0
2.0
0.1
0.3
B-15
-------
1 111
I
TABLE B-7 (continued)
BASELINE NONCONVENTlONAi POLLUTANT DISCHARGES
• ' BARGE CHEMICAL SUBCATEGORY
INDIRECT DISCHARGERS
Conversion Factors
:.'
,,l
Chemical
Chromium
Copper
Hexavalent Chromium
Iron
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
Tantalum
Titanium
Zinc
Zirconium
Total
Pollutants
Discharged
at Baseline
• (grams')
1,682
5,296
1,772
2,312,045
2,556
17,051
• 27
3,413
8,537
3,520
224
125,694
247
. * . ••. •
8,557,371
(18,912 pounds)
"
Grams/
Pounds
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
1 •" ' ' '
•
Toxic
Weighting
Factors
2.70&02
4.70E-61
5.10E-01
5.60E-03
1.80E+00
1.40E-02
5.00E+02
2.00E-01
3.60E-02
6.00E-62
2.90E-02
5.10E-02
5.40E-01
POTW
Removal
Factor
3.30E-01
' 1.60E-01
9.40E-01
1.70E-01
8.00E-02
5.90E-01
4.00E-01
4.80E-01
4.90E-01
4.50E-01
3.12E-01
2.20E-01
l.OOE+00
Pound
Equivalents
, Discharged
at Baseline
0.0
0.9
1.9
4.9
0.8
0.3
11.7
0.7
0.3
0.2
0.0
3.1
0.3
130.4
Note: Pound Equivalent Discharges are rounded to the nearest 0.1 pounds.
B-16
-------
TABLE B-8
BASELINE NONCONVENTIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGES
TRUCK PETROLEUM SUBCATEGORY
INDIRECT DISCHARGERS
,. Conversion Factors
Chemical
Acetone
Benzene
1,2-Dichloroethane
Ethylbenzene
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methyl isobutyl ketone
Methylene chloride
Tetrachloroethylene
Toluene .
1 , 1 , 1 -Trichloroethane
Trichloroethylene
Vinyl Acetate
m-Xylene
o4p-Xylene
Benzoic acid
Biphenyl
bis (2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate
4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol
n-Decane
Diphenyl Ether
n-Docosane
n-Dodecane
n-Eicosane
n-rHexacosane
n-Hexadecane
Hexanoic Acid
2-Isopropylnaphthalene
2-Methylnaphthalene
Naphthalene
n-Octacosane
n-Octadecane
Pentarhethylbenzene
Phenol
n-Tetracosane
n-Tetradecane • •
n-Triacontane
Tripropyleneglycol Methyl Ether
Aluminum ,
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Boron
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Pollutants
Discharged
at Baseline
(grams)
, 364,973
13,733
701
10,254
32,958
3,493
2,226
.961
54,707
. 3,274
702
3,766
16,445
8,016
17,370
385
103
17,578
46,633 ' .
11
3,185
34,547
16,550
3,235
21,426
6,022
4,151
3,711
3,513
2,259
7,248
3,909
2,705
3,445
10,209
87
1 13,949
. 13,642
55
143
2,410
29
38,658
175 ,
107,780
1,359
Grams/
Pounds
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.2l'E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
. 2.21E-03
• 2.21E-03
2.21E-03,
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03 '
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
"2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
Toxic
Weighting
Factors
7.6E-06
1.8E-02
6.2E-03
1.4E-03
2.2E-05
1.2E-04
4.2E-04
7.4E-02
5.6E-03
4.3E-03
6.3E-02
4.0E-03
1.5E-03
8.5E-03
3.3E-04
3.7E-02
1.1E+01
4.3E-03
4.3E-03
2.6E-02
8.2E-05
4.3E-03
4.3E-03
8.2E-05
4.3E-03
3.4E-04
9.8E-02 -
1.8E-02
1.5E-02
8.2E-05
4.3E-03
2.9E-01
2.8E-02
8.2E-05
4.3E-03
8.2E-05
8.2E-06
6.4E-02
1.9E-01
4.0E+00
2.0E-03
5.3E+00
1.8E-01
5.2E+00
2.8E-05
2.7E-02
Pound
POTW Equivalents
Removal Discharged
Factor at Baseline
1.6E-01
5.0E-02
1.1E-01
6.0E-02
8.0E-02
1.2E-01
4.6E-01
1.5E-01
4.0E-02
l.OE-01
1.3E-01
l.OE+00
3.5E-01
5.0E-02
1.9E-01
4.0E-02
4.0E-01
2.9E-01
9.1E-01-
3.0E-01
1.2E-01
5.0E-02
8;OE-02
2.9E-01
2.9E-01
1.6E-01
7.2E-01
7.2E-01
, 5.0E-02
2.9E-01
2.9E-01
9.0E-02
5.0E-02
2.9E-01
2.9E-01
2.9E-01
5.3E-01
1.2E-01
4.4E-01
l.OE-HX)
6.4E-01
5.4E-01
7.7E-01
l.OE-01
4.5E-01
3.3E-01
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
, 0.0
o.o -
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
. . 1.0
/ 0.0
• '0.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.6
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0,0
0.2
0.0
1.3
. 0.0
0.2
11.8
0.2
0.0
0.0
B-17
-------
TABLE B-8 (continued)
BASELINE NONCONVENTIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGES
TRUCK PETROLEUM SUBCATEGORY
INDIRECT DISCHARGERS
• ; . Conversion Factors
Chemical
Cobalt
Copper
Hexavalent Chromium
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
Phosphorus
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Sulfur
Tantalum
Thallium
Tin
Titanium
Tungsten
Vanadium
Zinc
Zirconium
Fluoride
Total Cyanide
Total
Pollutants
Discharged
at Baseline
(grams)
546
11,839
1,900
160,398
8,332
39,177
4,160
2
1,429
42,143
2,360
4,901
18
132
1,864,821
6,314
67
6
685
324
• 181
193
11,674
11
38,859
48
3,203,208
(7,079 pounds)
Grams/
Pounds
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
Toxic
Weighting
Factors
1.1E-01
4.7E-01
5.1E-01
5.6E-03
1.8E+00
8.7E-04
1.4E-02
5.0E+02
2.0E-01
3.6E-02
O.OE+00
1.1E-03
1.1E+00
4.7E-01
5.5E-06
5.6E-06
6-.OE-02
1.4E-01
l.QE-01
2.9E-02
5.3E-03
6.2E-01
5.1E-02
5.4E-01
3.5E-02
1.1E+00
POTW
Removal
Factor
6.3E-01
1.6E-01
9.4E-01
1.7E-01
8.0E-02
7.4E-01
5.9E-01
4.0E-01
4.8E-01
4.9E-01
3.1E-01
8.0E-01
5.4E-01
2.2E-01
4.5E-01
8.8E-01
4.5E-01
7.3E-01
3.5E-01
3.1E-01
4.5E-01
5.7E-01
2.2E-01
l.OE+00
3.9E-01
3.0E-01
Pound
Equivalents
Discharged
at Baseline
0.1
2.0
2.0
0.3
2.7
0.1
0.1
0.7
0.3
1.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.3
0.0
1.2
0.0
28.2
Note: Pound Equivalent Discharges are rounded to the nearest 0.1 pounds.
B-18
-------
TABLE B-9
BASELINE NONCONVENTIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGES
RAIL PETROLEUM SUBCATEGORY
INDIRECT DISCHARGERS
Chemical
Acetone ' .
, Benzene
1,2-Dichloroethane
Ethylbenzene
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methyl isobutyl ketone
Methylene chloride
Tetrachloroethylene
Toluene
1 , 1 , 1 -Trichloroethane
Trichloroethylene
Vinyl Acetate
m-Xylene
o+p-Xylene
Benzole acid
Biphenyl
bis (2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate
4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol
n-Decane
Dipheriyl Ether
n-Docosane
n-Dodecane
n-Eicosane
n-Hexacosane
n-Hexadecane
Hexanoic Acid
2-Isopropylnaphthalene
2-Methylnaphthalene
Naphthalene
n-Octacosane
n-Octadecane
Pentamethylbenzene
, Phenol
n-Tetracosane ; '
n-Tetradecane
n-Triacontane
Tripropyleneglycol Methyl Ether
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium '
Boron
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Pollutants
Discharged
at Baseline
(grams)
1,337
50
3
38
121
13
8 ,
4
200
'12
3
14
60
29
'. 64
1
0
64
171
6
12
127
61
12
78
•. 22
15
14
,13
8
27
14
10
13
37,
0
417
50
0
1
9
0
142
1
395
5
Grams/
Pounds
2.21E-03
- 2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
- 2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03,
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.2iE-03
2.21E-03
2.2.1E-03
Conversion Factors
, Toxic
Weighting
Factor
7.6E-06
1.8E-02
6.2E-03
1.4E-03
2.2E-05
'1.2E-04
4.2E-04
7.4E-02
5.6E-03
4.3E-03
6.3E-02
4.0E-03
1.5E-03
' 8.5E-03
3.3E-04
3.7E-02
; 1.1E+01
4.3E-03
4.3E-03
2.6E-02
8.2E-05
4.3E-03
. 4.3E-03
8.2E-05
4.3E-03'
3.4E-04
• - 9.8E-02
1.8E-02
1.5E-02
8.2E-05
4.3E-03
2.9E-01
2.8E-02
8.2E-05
4.3E-03
8.2E-05
8.2E-06
6.4E-02
1.9E-01 •
4.0E+00
2.0E-CJ3
5.3E+00
1.8E-01
5.2E+00
2.8E-05
2.7E-02
Pound
POTW Equivalents
Removal Discharged
Factor at Baseline
1.6E-01
5.0E-02
1.1E-01
6.0E-02 ' . i .
8.0E-02
1.2E-01
4.6E-01
1.5E-01
4.0E-02
l.OE-01
K3E-01
. l.OE-MM)
3.5E-01
5.0E-02
, 1.9E-01
. 4.0E-02
4.0E-01
, 2.9E-01
9.1E-01 .
3.0E-01
1.2E-01
5.0E-02
8.0E-02
2.9E-01
2.9E-01
1.6E-01
7.2E-01
7.2E-01
5.0E-02
2.9E-01
2.9E-01
9.0E-02
5.0E-02
2.9E-01
2.9E-01
2.9E-01
5.3E-01-
1.2E-01 ,
4.4E-01
l.OE+00
6.4E-01
5.4E-OT
7.7E-01
l.OE-01
4.5E-01
3.3E-01
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
. 0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
. 0.0
do
'0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
, 0,0
0.0
.0.0
0.0
B-19
-------
TABLE B-9 (continued)
BASELINE NONCONVENTIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGES
RAIL PETROLEUM SUBCAtEGORY
INDIRECT DISCHARGERS
1
Chemical
Cobalt
Copper
Hexavalent Chromium
Iron
Lead '
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
phosphorus
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Sulfur
Tantalum
Thallium
T>n
Titanium
Tungsten
Vanadium
Zinc
Zirconium
Fluoride
Total Cyanide
Total
'. ' : •> "IK
Pollutants
Discharged
at Baseline
(grams)
2
43
v 7
587
31
143
15
0
5
154
9
18
0
0
6,830
23
0
0
3 . "
i
i
i
43
0
142
0
11,732
(26 pounds)
Grams/
Pounds
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2^21 E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
Conversion Factors
Toxic
Weighting
Factor
1.1E-01
4.7E-01
5.1E-01
5.6E-03
1.8E+00
8.7E-04
1.4E-02
5.0E+02
2.0E-01
3.6E-02
O.OE+00
1.1E-03
1.1E+00
4.7E-01
5.5E-06
5.6E-06
6.0E-02
1.4E-01
3.0E-01
2.9E-02
5.3E-03
6.2E-01
5.1E-02
5.4E-01
3.5E-02
1.1E+00
POTW
Removal
Factor
6.3E-01
1.6E-01
9.4E-01
1.7E-01
8.0E-02
7.4E-01
5.9E-01
4.0E-01
4.8E-01
4.9E-01
3.1E-01
8.0E-01
5.4E-01
2.2E-01
4.5E-01
8.8E-01
4.5E-01
7.3E-01
3.5E-01
3.1E-01
4.5E-01
5.7E-01
2.2E-01
l.OE+00
3.9E-01
3.0E-01
Pound
Equivalents
Discharged
at Baseline
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0 .
0.0
0.0
\
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
Note: Pound Equivalent Discharges are rounded to the nearest 0.1 pounds.
B-20
-------
TABLE B-10
BASELINE NONCONVENTIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGES
TRUCK FOOD SUBCATEGORY
INDIRECT DISCHARGERS
Conversion Factors
.
Chemical
Benzoic acid
Hexanoic Acid
Phenol
Pollutants
Discharged
at Baseline
(grams)
2,072,555,307
48,273,877,828
213,127,187
Grams/
Pounds
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
Toxic
Weighting
Factor
3.30E-04
3.40E-04
2.80E-02
POTW
Removal
Factor
1.90E-01
1.60E-01
5.00E-02
Pound
Equivalents
Dischargee!
at Baseline
287.2
5,803.7
659.4
Total
50,559,560,322
(111,736,628 pounds)
6,750.3
Note: Pound Equivalent Discharges are rounded to the nearest 0.1 pounds.
B-21
-------
TABLE B-ll
BASELINE NONCONVENTlbNAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGES
RAIL FOOD SUBCATEGORY
INDIRECT DISCHARGERS
Conversion Factors
Chemical
Benzole acid
Htexanoic Acid
Phenol
Total
Pollutants
Discharged
at Baseline
(grams)
'1 ;',"",.',.
594,567,143
13,848,655,349
61,141,066
"i ' . ': ' • ' ,1
14,504,363,558
, (32,054,643 pounds)
Toxic
Grams/ Weighting
Pounds Factor
2.21E-03 3.30E-04
2.21E-03 3.40E-04
2.21E-03 2.80E-62
POTW
Removal
Factor '
1.90E-01
1.60E-01
5.00E-02
Pound
Equivalents
Discharged
at Baseline
i1
82.4
1,664.9
189.2
1,936.5
Npte: Pound Equivalent Discharges are rounded to the nearest 0.1 pounds.
B-22
-------
TABLE B-12
BASELINE NONCONVENTIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGES
BARGE FOOD SUBCATEGORY
INDIRECT DISCHARGERS
Conversion Factors
•
Chemical
Benzoic acid
Hexanoic Acid
Phenol
Pollutants
Discharged
.at Baseline
(grams)
3,937,080
91,702,454
404,861
Grams/
Pounds
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
Toxic
Weighting
Factor
3.30E-04
3.40E-04
2.80E-02
POTW
Removal
Factor
1.90E-01
1.60E-01
5.00E-02
Pound
Equivalents
Discharged
at Baseline
0.5
11.0
1.3
Total
96,044,395
(212,258 pounds)
12.8
Note: Pound Equivalent Discharges are rounded to the nearest 0.1 pounds.
B-23
-------
TABLE B-13
BASELINE NONCONVENTIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGES
TRUCK HOPPER SUBCATEGORY
INDIRECT DISCHARGERS
Conversion Factors
Chemical
Aluminum
Beryllium
Calcium
Chromium
Iron
Manganese
Titanium
Zinc
Total
Pollutants
- Discharged
at Baseline
(grams)
74,225
23
1,356,462
605
419,112
13,742
2,174
1,219
1,867,563
(4, 127 pounds)
Grams/
Pounds
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
: . .
Toxic
Weighting
Factor
6.40E-02
5.30E+00
2.80E-05
2.70E-02
5.60E-03
1.40E-02
2.90E-02
5.10E-02
" ' „ , :; ;
POTW
Removal
Factor
1.20E-01
5.40E-01
4.50E-01
3.30E-01
1.70E-01
5.90E-01
3.10E-01
2.20E-01
Pound
Equivalents
Discharged
at Baseline
1.3
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.9
0.3
0.0
0.0
2.7
Note: Pound Equivalent Discharges are rounded to the nearest 0.1 pounds.
B-24
-------
TABLE B-14
BASELINE NONCONVENTIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGES
RAIL HOPPER SUBCATEGORY
INDIRECT DISCHARGERS
Conversion Factors
Chemical
Aluminum
Beryllium
Calcium
Chromium
Iron
Manganese
Titanium
Zinc
Total
Pollutants
Discharged
at Baseline
(grams)
689
0
15,134
11
3,644
132
13
13
19,635
(43 pounds)
Grams/
Pounds
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
Toxic
Weighting
Factor
6.40E-02
5.30E+OQ
2.80E-05
2.70E-02
5.60E-03
1.40E-02
2.90E-02
5.10E-02
POTW
Removal
Factor
1.20E-01
5.40E-01
4.50E-01
3.30E-01
1.70E-01
5.90E-01
3.10E-01
2.20E-01
Pound
Equivalents
Discharged
at Baseline
0.0
0.0
0.0
. 0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Note: Pound Equivalent Discharges are rounded to the nearest 0.1 pounds.
B-25
-------
; -S •''• : .'. TABLE B-is '
. . ]|i! " • ', •"•','. ! ". , '.,,' i.' , " ' ''
BASELINE NONCONVENTIpNAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGES
I ;' BARGE HOPPERSUBCATEGORY ''"''[
DIRECT DISCHARGERS
Conversion Factors
-;;;
Chemical
Aluminum
Beryllium
Calcium
Chromium
Iron
Manganese
Titanium
Zinc
Total
; „ jj|..
Pollutants
Discharged
at Baseline
(grams)
93,992
29
1,721,537
775
530,356
17,409
2,743
1,547
2,368,387
(5,234 pounds)
Grams/
Pounds
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
:••- ..::•.•„.;
Toxic
Weighting
Factor
6.40E-02
5.30E+00
2.80E-05
2.70E-02
5.60E-03
1.40E-02
2.90E-02
5.10E-02
Pound
Equivalents
Discharged
at Baseline
13.3
0.3
0.1
0.0
6.6
0.5
0.2
0.2
21.2
Note: Pound Equivalent Discharges are rounded to the nearest 0.1 pounds.
B-26
-------
TABLE B-16
BASELINE NONCONVENTIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGES
BARGE HOPPER SUBCATEGORY
INDIRECT DISCHARGERS
Conversion Factors
Chemical
Aluminum
Beryllium
Calcium
Chromium
Iron
Manganese
Titanium
Zinc
Total
Pollutants
Discharged
at Baseline
(grams)
22,992
4
505,338
333
121,664
4,416
442
441
655,629
(1,449 pounds)
Grams/
Pounds
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
2.21E-03
Toxic
Weighting
Factor
6.40E-02
5.30E+00
2.80E-05
2.70E-02
5.60E-03
1.40E-02
2.90E-02
5.10E-02
POTW
Removal
Factor
1.20E-01
5.40E-01
4.50E-01
3.30E-01
1.70E-01
5.90E-01
3.10E-01
2.20E-01
- ,
Pound
Equivalents
Discharged
at Baseline
0.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.8
Note: Pound Equivalent Discharges are rounded to the nearest 0.1 pounds.
B-27
-------
B-28
-------
APPENDIX C
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION FOR
COST-EFiraClTVENESS ANALYSIS:
CONVENTIONAL POLLUTANT REMOVALS
C-l
-------
C-2
-------
^3
i o^
• ! .. >
o ..
S3
, § • cq
* c
fi
&l cia c»
2 H QS
.H •< W
z u p
3. gll
W N-J »j -y
.j ^J ]^J ^5
eg " O' u H
S§g.
O W S1
• zy
>l •
Z H
0
u
'
,
' " 0
OH
(H
^
$
version F
G
O
y
^^.
c
o
'•I—I
a.
O
CO
"§
O
.%
a
1
o
S /*^^
ECO
!••
c2
§
-^*
Q.
O
^^
nt
'§
(U
O
§Q Q
• Z S
ro o^ fo
O O O
WWW
CN cN CN
CN cN «S
III
'1 '
S'
0
Q
0
CT CO
g^ *X3
• — ."o
S 4> (D
X! CJ rf
O 4' 1>
O ^"* fe
pA ^) ^^
• ^5 ,*O
Q *•' i
wn H O
S
s
co
c
I
•8
O
co
••3'
C-3
-------
,
3
*'
r_j
^
|e2
•ft O
« w C§
E- H U
^3 CJ fy*
H °3 •<
3 5a S
||s
ill
w3
^^ CC
z
u
, ''":!
>
E <- v
<3 "a
•11
a
s.
u.
O
1
—
_0
1
I
1
4> tn
22 S
C 00
I
(2
„,
c
0
•J=
C§
cs
c
.2
s
§
§
t/5
•o
§
0
1
S2
O
ro
C
.2
O
ts
c
o
s
l
c
0
i
_
"1
U
Q Q Q
Z Z Z
Q Q Q
Z ZZ
§o o
z z
f> CO CO
o o o
WWW
?3 fl CS
fN CN tS
Q Q Q
Z Z Z
Hi
Q Q Q
Z Z Z
•a
c
ra
E
0
g
00
>> M
X -n
o S
— o
T3 (J5
_o ,1;
S *O an
•** F
.2 &o
^OT •«
111 .
a
z
.. - ..
z
g
Q
Z
Q
Z
Q
Z
1
^
Is
?
c
o
o
CA
OJ
C
'S
X)-
o
-§
1
Q
1
•3
Z
C-4
-------
CO
1*.
is
(2 H jG
' i^^
3 111
W . *J' *j 'U
CO O r ^ ^T1
^2 ^^ ^^ ^2
•< • « B ,
H ' J S.g
0 U H
S w O
y pj
> «•
5k
(^)
u •.
1 •
"S
o
E'/-
S M
K ^
1 1
_3
*»«
O
2
u
onversion 1
U
tN
c
o
•,£
Q
O
I 1~~C
J
"c
O
V
C
Grams/Poi
T3
U
Q
E
<1> 'w1
p^ g
c ci
^3
^
^^ . ,
' g
O
.&
o
H
O
"§
's
u
x;
U
r- TT IN
, .»-H •Sf (»
^*v ^J^ ^-J^
>O tN O
0 VO •-!
so oo •-<_
, tN fN so
ON so in
m
'^-
• ^
oo
l/l
ON,
0
-^ en" oo~ rn'
ON IO (^
Tf t~" i— ^
co fO ro
O cp o
WWW
cN fS f ^
tN' tN f-4
^i in -•<
ro CO I**-
oC -T ^h"
ON ON 'st*
00^ CN^ f\
co" o r-T
r-- ON r-t
. tN ro co^
r-T
- ON .ON Tf
»22 1:
/^ *S • *
(•H ' Q ^H
•A H o
V)
so"
-
s
" p)
CO
in
so"
°i.
-------
^.
0
1
•<2
to
*_*
c3
13
CO
•g
=3
O
•3
1
-------
APPENDIX D
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION FOR
COST-EF3FECHVENESS ANALYSIS:
BASELINE CONVENTIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGES
D-l
-------
! i
D-2
-------
O c«
LE
00 '
c3
Q .o
•S -S
c 13
5 8
ged
s
ts .'Disch
line r
5 ffl
O
o en
•* ys.
O\ -
CN
ON
00"
cs
m m "m
o o o
WWW
CS CN CS
in
~S o"
cs
,00
A
oo
c
0>
Q
-------
B
g
$5
u
i— i >•<
£•* p^
H O
5 § g
.i; ..^ "^
;, .' £P *2
^ .3
.a <3
:: 'Q o
-" "2 ^
<» 2
T3 O
G ^
g g
e '^
§ (U
H ^
O o
U
H H W 1
IONAL POLLU
MICAL SUBCA
CTDISCHARG
t"* E&I Cxi]
w * a
> Jj W
o ^
U K
i
2
ta^
M
1
its Discharged
eline (grams)
c3 J§
M m
CL, '*
T3
o
'I
6
ON CS t-
O CS CO
T}- ^- vo
cs"
co co co
O O O
WWW
CS CS 01
cs oi oi
uo c*^ co
vi \,Q oo
oo ON oo
»-< O^ es
•a
g
u
Q
c
So
x* M
t— i *O
i^§ «
(D ^ W
•g § I
C3 C^4 ^**
•^ g O
f^ *O
cd grt w
9 1- -a
«A H 0
oo
vo
*3-
co"
00
vo
oC
VO
?-^
3
f2
D-4
-------
TABLE D-3
*T3 ,^
O CO
OO -O
11
.Q ^
• -
w -
O
3
S
u
Ig
H y
.H -rf H
NVENTIONAL POLLU
GE CHEMICAL SUBC
DIRECT DISCHARG
05
rj •<
Cfi
W
Z
3
03
W
3:S
S
in
-. « •« *
SSS
VO
. MD
Os"
oo
"T.
\o"
oo
vo
oo
05.
CN
'
"e3
•+— *
E2
D-5
-------
t
o
9
o§
«
ll
a.9
J"a3
w
^^ C3
oo
oo
CO -2
*° y
a ,w
3 ^
o g
o5 '§
§ u
CQ ^»
Og
u
•a
-------
|