&EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water (4303) EPA821-R-00-005 March 2000 Cost-Effectiveness Analysis for the Final Action Regarding Pretreatment Standards for the Industrial Laundries Point Source Category (Revised March 2000) ------- COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS FOR THE FINAL ACTION REGARDING PRETREATMENT STANDARDS FOR THE INDUSTRIAL LAUNDRIES POINT SOURCE CATEGORY (REVISED MARCH 2000) FINAL REPORT Carol M. Browner Administrator J. Charles Fox Assistant Administrator, Office of Water Sheila Frace Director, Engineering and Analysis Division Marvin B. Rubin Chief, Energy Branch George Denning Work Assignment Manager Engineering and Analysis Division Office of Science and Technology U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington, D.C. 20460 ------- FOREWORD This document delineates the cost-effectiveness analysis of the final action regarding pretreatment standards for the Industrial Laundries Point Source Category. Based on revised analytical data for semivolatile organic compounds for two sampling episodes conducted in 1996 and 1998, EPA revised this document in March 2000. The following sections and appendices have been revised: Section 2 —footnote #2; —Table 2-2. Section 3 —Table 3-1. • Section 4 —Table 4-1. • Appendix A Appendix B —Table B-l and B-2; reference date of 1999 deleted. ------- ACKNOWLEDGMENT This report has been reviewed and approved for publication by the Engineering and Analysis Division, Office of Science and Technology. This report was prepared with the support of Eastern Research Group, Inc. (Contract No. 68-C6-0022), under the direction and review of the Office of Science and Technology. ------- CONTENTS Page SECTION ONE INTRODUCTION 1-1 SECTION TWO BACKGROUND AND METHODOLOGY 2-1 2.1 Pollutants of Concern 2-3 2.2 Toxic Weighting Factors 2-3 2.3 Pollution Control Options 2-4 2.4 Pollutant Removals 2-5 2.5 Annualized Costs of Compliance 2-6 2.6 Calculation of the Cost-Effectiveness Values 2-8 SECTION THREE COST-EFFECTIVENESS RESULTS 3-1 SECTION FOUR COMPARISON OF COST-EFFECTIVENESS VALUES WITH PROMULGATED RULES 4-1 APPENDIX A SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION FOR COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS: POLLUTANT LOADING ANALYSIS A-l APPENDIX B SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION FOR COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS: COST ANALYSIS B-l ------- SECTION ONE INTRODUCTION This report supports the analysis of options and cutoffs considered as pretreatment standards for the industrial laundries industry. In this document, the total annualized cost of each of two regulatory options are compared to the corresponding effectiveness of that option, at the cutoffs, considered in reducing the discharge of pollutants. EPA evaluates the effectiveness in terms of costs per pound of pollutant removed, weighted by the relative toxicity of the pollutant (toxic weighting factor). The rationale for this measure, referred to as "pounds-equivalent removed," is described later in this document. Section Two discusses EPA's cost-effectiveness methodology and identifies the pollutants included in the analysis. This section also presents EPA's toxic weighting factors for each pollutant and considers the removal efficiency of each option. Section Three presents the results of the cost-effectiveness analysis. In Section Four, the cost-effectiveness value for the regulatory option and cutoff considered for the pretreatment standards is compared to cost-effectiveness values for other proposed and promulgated rules. Appendix A and B present the pollutant reduction and costs for all cutoffs considered under the two options that EPA considered during its decisionmaking process. 1-1 ------- SECTION TWO BACKGROUND AND METHODOLOGY Cost-effectiveness (CE) is evaluated as the incremental and average annualized cost of a pollution control option in an industry or industry subcategory per incremental and total pound equivalent of pollutant (i.e., pound of pollutant adjusted for toxicity) removed by that control option. The cost- effectiveness analysis primarily enables EPA to compare the removal efficiencies of regulatory options under consideration for a rule. A secondary use is to compare the cost effectiveness of the proposed option for the pretreatment standards to that of pretreatment standards for other industries. EPA generally ranks options in order of increasing pound equivalents removed to identify the point at which increased removal of pollutants is no longer cost-effective. EPA typically determines this to be where costs (per pound equivalent removed) increase sharply, that is, where relatively few incremental pounds are removed for steady increases in cost. The accompanying figure (Figure 2-1) shows this point as Point A, where the cost-effectiveness curve becomes nearly vertical. Increases in removals beyond this point come only at relatively high unit costs, which, in many cases, EPA will determine exceed the benefit of the increased removals to society. In this analysis, for reasons discussed below, EPA presents average cost-effectiveness values only. A number of steps must be undertaken before a cost-effectiveness analysis can be performed. There are five steps that define the analysis or generate data for use in the cost-effectiveness calculation: • Determine the wastewater pollutants of concern (priority and other pollutants). • Estimate the relative toxic weights (the adjustments to pounds of pollutants to reflect toxicity) of the pollutants of concern. • Define the regulatory pollution control options. • Calculate pollutant removals for each pollution control option. • Determine the annualized cost of each pollution control option. 2-1 ------- ji o Range of noncost-i effective removals Range of cost-effective removals 100 Percentage of pound equivalents removed Figure 2-1. Cost effectiveness 2-2 ------- All of these factors are used in the calculation of the cost-effectiveness values, which can then be compared for each regulatory option under consideration. The following sections discuss the five preliminary steps and the cost-effectiveness calculation and comparison methodologies. 2.1 POLLUTANTS OF CONCERN Under the pretreatment standards, a number of priority and other nonconventional pollutants are regulated. Some of the factors considered in selecting pollutants for regulation include toxicity, frequency of occurrence in wastestream effluent, and amount of pollutant in the wastestream. The list of regulated pollutants for each option is presented in Appendix A. 2.2 TOXIC WEIGHTING FACTORS Cost-effectiveness analyses account for differences in toxicity among the pollutants using toxic weighting factors. These factors are necessary because different pollutants have different potential effects on human and aquatic life. For example, a pound of zinc in an effluent stream has a significantly different effect than a pound of PCBs. Toxic weighting factors for pollutants are derived using ambient water quality criteria and toxicity values. For most industries, toxic weighting factors are derived from chronic freshwater aquatic criteria. In cases where a human health criterion has also been established for the consumption offish, the sum of both the human and aquatic criteria are used to derive toxic weighting factors. The factors are standardized by relating them to a "benchmark" toxicity value that was based on the toxicity of copper when the methodology was developed.1 Appendix A presents the toxic weighting factors used for the regulated pollutants in the cost-effectiveness analysis of the industrial laundries industry. 1 Although the water quality criterion has been revised (to 12.0 (jg/1), all cost-effectiveness analyses for effluent guideline regulations continue to use the "old" criterion of 5.6 (jg/1 as a benchmark so that cost- effectiveness values can continue to be compared to those for other effluent guidelines. Where copper is present in the effluent, the revised higher criterion for copper results in a toxic weighting factor for copper of 0.467 rather than 1.0. 2-3 ------- Examples of the effects of different aquatic and human health criteria on freshwater toxic weighting factors are presented in Table 2-1. As shown in this table, the toxic weighting factor is the sum of two criteria-weighted ratios: the "benchmark/old" copper criterion divided by the human health criterion for the particular pollutant and the "benchmark/old" copper criterion divided by the aquatic chronic criterion. For example, using the values reported in Table 2-1, 11 pounds of the benchmark chemical (copper) pose the same relative hazard in freshwater as one pound of cadmium because cadmium has a freshwater toxic weight 11 times as large as the toxic weight of copper (5.16/0.467=11.05). Table 2-1 Examples of Toxic Weighting Factors Based on Copper Freshwater Chronic Criteria Pollutant Copper3 Cadmium Naphthalene Human Health Criteria (us/1) 84 41,026 Aquatic Chronic Criteria (jig/1) 12.0 1.1 370 Weighting Calculation 5.6/12.0 5.6/84 + 5.6/1.1 5.6/41,026 + 5.6/370 Toxic Weighting Factor 0.467 5.16 0.015 aAlthough the water quality criterion for copper has been revised (to 12.0 (jg/1), the cost effectiveness analysis used the previous criterion (5.6 (jg/1) to facilitate comparisons with cost-effectiveness values for other effluent limitations guidelines. The revised higher criteria for copper results in a toxic weighting factor for copper equal to 0.467 instead of 1.0, which was the result of the previous criterion. Notes: Human health and aquatic chronic criteria are maximum contamination thresholds. Units for criteria are micrograms of pollutant per liter of water. Sources: EPA, 1997. Toxic and Pollutant Weighting Factors for Pretreatment Standards for the Industrial Laundries Point Source Category. June. 2-4 ------- 2.3 POLLUTION CONTROL OPTIONS Pretreatment Standards for Existing Sources (PSES) and Pretreatment Standards for New Sources (PSNS) options would have been issued had EPA promulgated a rule. Because there are no direct discharges in the industrial laundry industry, Best Available Technology (BAT), New Source Performance Standards (NSPS), and Best Practicable Control Technology (BPT) are not considered. This cost- effectiveness analysis was performed for two pollution control options, at each cutoff, for indirect dischargers: CP-IL, chemical precipitation treatment of wastewater from industrial laundry items; and DAF-IL, dissolved air flotation treatment of wastewater from industrial laundry items. A zero-discharge option is not considered within the analysis. The cutoffs are defined as: • A cutoff excluding all facilities laundering less than 1 million pounds of incoming laundry (total) and less than 255,000 pounds of shop and/or printer towels per calender year (this cutoff is identical to that proposed). This cutoff is called the 1 MM/255K cutoff for the purposes of this EA. • A cutoff excluding all facilities that launder between 1 and 3 million pounds of incoming laundry (total) and less than 120,000 pounds of shop and/or printer towels per calender year, in addition to those facilities laundering less than 1 million pounds of incoming laundry (total) and less than 255,000 pounds of shop and/or printer towels per calender year. This cutoff is called the 3MM/120K cutoff for the purposes of this EA. • A cutoff excluding all facilities laundering less than 5 million pounds of incoming laundry (total) and less than 255,000 pounds of shop and/or printer towels per calender year. This cutoff is called the 5MM/255K cutoff for the purposes of this EA. EPA's selected option and cutoff is CP-IL under the 3MM/120K cutoff. 2.4 POLLUTANT REMOVALS The pollutant loadings have been calculated for each facility under each regulatory cutoff and option for comparison with baseline loadings. The postregulatory removals under each regulatory cutoff and option are presented in Appendix A. 2-5 ------- Pollutant removals are calculated directly as the difference between current and post-treatment discharges. Removals are then weighted using the toxic weighting factors and are reported in pound equivalents (see Appendix A for pound-equivalent removals for all pollutants by pollutant and cutoff). Total removals for each cutoff are then calculated by summing the removals for all pollutants under each cutoff. One additional step is undertaken to calculate final reductions in pollutant loadings for indirect dischargers because of the ability of POTWs to remove pollutants, measured as POTW removal efficiencies. Appendix A presents the POTW removal efficiencies for 72 pollutants. POTW removal efficiencies are used as follows. If a facility is discharging 100 pounds of cadmium in its effluent stream to a POTW and the POTW has a removal efficiency for cadmium of 38 percent, then the cadmium discharged to surface waters is only 62 pounds. If the regulation results in a reduction of cadmium in the effluent stream such that total cadmium discharged to the POTW is 50 pounds, then the amount discharged to surface waters is calculated as 50 pounds multiplied by the POTW removal efficiency factor (1 - 0.38 or 0.62 times 50 pounds equals 31 pounds). The cost- effectiveness calculations then reflect the fact that the actual reduction of pollutant discharged to surface water is not 50 pounds (the change in the amount discharged to the POTW), but 31 pounds (the change in the amount actually discharged to surface water). Pollutant removals calculated in this way are presented in Table 2-2. 2.5 ANNUALIZED COSTS OF COMPLIANCE Under each regulatory cutoff, annualized costs of compliance have been developed.2 The derivation of these costs is summarized briefly below. 2 U.S. EPA, 2000. Technical Development Document for the Final Action Regarding Pretreatment Standards for the Industrial Laundries Point Source Category (Revised March 2000) .821 -R-00-006. March, and U.S. EPA, 2000. Economic Assessment for the Final Action Regarding Pretreatment Standards for the Industrial Laundries Point Source Category (RevisedMarch 2000). 821-R-00-004. March. 2-6 ------- Table 2-2 Total Pollutant Removals by Option and Cutoff Option Pounds Removed Pounds-Equivalent Removed CP-IL no cutoff 1MM/255K cutoff 3MM/120K cutoff 5MM/255K cutoff 143,410,775 139,765,321 129,736,310 108,573,146 42,917 42,155 38,483 31,403 DAF-IL no cutoff 1MM/255K cutoff 3MM/120K cutoff 5MM/255K cutoff 157,363,650 153,652,407 140,768,046 115,088,807 35,245 34,542 31,577 25,774 Source: Tables A-l through A-8. 2-7 ------- EPA derived the pretax costs (including the state and federal governments' share of compliance costs)3 of purchasing, installing, and operating pollution control equipment. EPA annualized any capital costs at 7 percent4 over 16 years and added these costs to the annual costs of operating the pollution control equipment. The aggregate annual pretax costs by option are presented in Table 2-3. Appendix B presents the calculations used to arrive at the aggregate annual costs figures presented in Table 2-3. 2.6 CALCULATION OF THE COST-EFFECTIVENESS VALUES Cost-effectiveness values are calculated separately for each regulatory option. Generally, options first are ranked in ascending order of pounds equivalent of pollutants removed. The incremental cost-effectiveness value for a particular control option is calculated as the ratio of the incremental annual cost to the incremental pounds equivalent removed. Average cost-effectiveness values for each option are calculated as total dollars for the option divided by total pounds equivalent removed by the option. The incremental cost-effectiveness values are viewed in comparison to the baseline (zero costs/zero removals) for the first option and to the preceding regulatory option. Cost-effectiveness values are reported in units of dollars per pounds equivalent of pollutant removed. In this report, EPA presents average cost-effectiveness values, as discussed below. For the purpose of comparing cost-effectiveness values of options under review to those of other promulgated rules, compliance costs used in the cost-effectiveness analysis (which are in 1993 dollars) are adjusted to 1981 dollars using Engineering News Records Construction Cost Index (CCI) (see Table 3 for compliance costs in 1981 dollars). This adjustment factor is calculated as follows: Adjustment factor = (1981 CCI)/(1993 CCI) = 3,535/5,210 = 0.6785 The equation used to calculate incremental cost effectiveness is: 3 Every dollar spent on compliance can be applied against a firm's taxable income. Due to various tax mechanisms such as accelerated depreciation, this reduction means that firms face only about 70 percent of compliance costs after taxes. 4 Source of real cost of capital: Office of Management and Budget (OMB), 1996. "Memorandum to the regulatory working group on economic analysis of federal regulations under Executive Order 12866." Sally Katzen. 2-8 ------- Table 2-3 Aggregate Annual Cost by Option and Cutoff Option Pretax Annualized Cost ($1993) Pretax Annualized Cost ($1981) CP-IL no cutoff 1MM/255K cutoff 3MM/120K cutoff 5MM/255K cutoff $179,038,176 $170,554,625 $130,174,744 $77,651,658 $121,477,403 $115,721,313 $88,323,564 $52,686,650 DAF-IL no cutoff 1MM/255K cutoff 3MM/120K cutoff 5MM/255K cutoff $194,646,184 $186,452,404 $145,061,785 $88,648,588 $132,067,436 $126,507,956 $98,424,421 $60,148,067 Source: see Tables B-l and B-2. 2-9 ------- CEk = ATC, - ATC, where: CEk= Cost-effectiveness of Option k ATCk= Total annualized treatment cost under Option k PEk= Pound equivalents removed by Option k The numerator of the equation, ATCk minus ATCk.1; is simply the incremental annualized treatment cost in going from Option k-1 (an option that removes fewer pound equivalent pollutants) to Option k (an option that removes more pound equivalent pollutants). The denominator is similarly the incremental removals achieved in going from Option k-1 to k. Thus, cost effectiveness measures the incremental unit cost of pollutant removal of Option k (in pound equivalents) in comparison to Option k-1. Because the options are ranked in ascending order of pound equivalents of pollutants removed, any option that has higher costs but lower removals than another option immediately can be identified (the cost-effectiveness value for the next option becomes negative). When negative values are computed for Option k, Option k-1 will be noted as "dominated" (having a higher cost and lower removals than Option k). Option k-1 is then removed from the cost-effectiveness calculations, and all cost-effectiveness values within a regulatory grouping are then recalculated without the "dominated" option. This process continues until all "dominated" options are eliminated. The remaining options can then be presented in terms of their incremental cost-effectiveness values and are considered viable options for regulatory consideration. Average cost-effectiveness values can also be derived by setting ATCk_! to zero and by setting the pollutant loadings (PEk_]) to the current loading. These values can be used, with caution, to compare an option to previously promulgated effluent limitations guidelines. Because the DAF-IL option removes fewer pollutants at a higher cost than the CP-IL option, DAF-IL is dominated. Because DAF-IL is dominated incremental cost-effectiveness is not meaningful. Thus EPA presents, in Section Three, the average cost- effectiveness results for CP-IL and DAF-IL at each cutoff. 2-10 ------- SECTION THREE COST-EFFECTIVENESS RESULTS In this cost-effectiveness analysis, EPA evaluates two PSES options, assuming only that wastewater from industrial laundry items will be treated (linen supply wastewater would not have required treatment). If untreated, the treated and untreated streams are combined prior to discharge. Table 3-1 presents the cost-effectiveness data and results. As Table 3-1 shows, the average cost-effectiveness value for the CP-IL 3MM/120K option is $2,295/lb-eq. Note that because DAF-IL is dominated, the average cost-effectiveness value of CP-IL under the 3MM/120K cutoff is also the incremental cost-effectiveness value for that option and cutoff. Table 3-1 Cost-Effectiveness Results by Option and Cutoff Option Total Annual Pound Equivalents Removed (Ibs.) Cost ($1981) Average Cost Effectiveness ($1981) ($/lb. equiv.) CP-IL No cutoff 1MM/255K 3MM/120K 5MM/255K 42,917 42,155 38,483 31,403 $121,477,403 $115,721,313 $88,323,564 $52,686,650 $2,831 $2,745 $2,295 $1,678 DAF-IL No cutoff 1MM/255K 3MM/120K 5MM/7.55K 35,245 34,542 31,577 7.5 774 $132,067,436 $126,507,956 $98,424,421 $60 148067 $3,747 $3,662 $3,117 $7. 334 3-1 ------- SECTION FOUR COMPARISON OF COST-EFFECTIVENESS VALUES WITH PROMULGATED RULES As discussed in Section Two, incremental cost-effectiveness is the appropriate measure for comparing one regulatory option to an alternative, less stringent regulatory option for the same rule. Some believe that it may also be used to compare cost-effectiveness across rules when considering how the last increment of stringency in one rule compares to the last increment of stringency in another. For comparing the overall cost-effectiveness of one rule to another, average cost-effectiveness may be a more appropriate measure, but must be considered in context with caution. (Average cost-effectiveness can be thought of as the "increment" between no regulation and the selected option, for any given rule.) In this case, because only two options are considered and one is dominated, the average and incremental values of the selected option under the 3MM/120K cutoff are the same. Table 4-1 presents the incremental cost-effectiveness value for the regulatory option considered (CP-IL under the 3MM/120K cutoff) and pretreatment standards issued for other industries. The numbers presented here for this rulemaking are pretax costs, whereas many of the numbers presented for other effluent guidelines are after-tax costs—that is, the costs actually faced by the firms, not the total cost of the equipment (which is subsidized by reductions in taxable income). Because of these factors and the fact that EPA could only conduct and average cost effectiveness for this industry, direct comparisons between this rulemaking and others cannot be made easily. The equivalent after-tax cost, however, is approximately 70 percent of pretax costs. As Table 3-1 shows, the cost-effectiveness of the primary regulatory option is $2,295 per pound equivalent removed. Compared to other effluent guidelines, EPA does not consider this rule to be cost-effective. 4-1 ------- TABLE 4-1 INDUSTRY COMPARISON OF PSES INCREMENTAL COST-EFFECTIVENESS FOR INDIRECT DISCHARGERS (Toxic and Nonconventional Pollutants Only; Copper-Based Weights3; $ 1981) Industry Aluminum Forming Battery Manufacturing Canmaking Coal Mining13 Coastal Oil and Gasb Coil Coating Copper Forming Electronics I Electronics II Foundries Industrial Laundries Inorganic Chemicals I Inorganic Chemicals II Iron and Steel Leather Tanning Metal Finishing Nonferrous Metals Forming Nonferrous Metals Manufacturin Nonferrous Metals Manufacturin Offshore Oil and Gasb OCSPSFC Pharmaceuticals A/C B/D Plastics Molding and Forming PE Currently Discharged (thousands) 1,602 1,152 252 NA NA 2,503 34 75 260 2,136 181 3,971 4,760 5,599 16,830 11,680 189 >I 3,187 >II 38 NA 5,210 897 90 NA PE Remaining at Selected Option (thousands) 18 5 5 NA NA 10 4 35 24 18 142 3,004 6 1,404 1,899 755 5 19 0.41 NA 72 614 9 NA Cost-Effectiveness of Selected Option(s) (S/PE removed) 155 15 38 NA NA 10 10 14 14 116 2,295 9 <1 6 111 10 90 15 12 NA 34 96 66 NA 4-2 ------- TABLE 4-1 (continued) Industry Porcelain Enameling Pulp and Paper4 Transportation Equipment Cleaning4 PE Currently Discharged (thousands) 1,565 9,539 426 PE Remaining at Selected Option (thousands) 96 103 383 Cost-Effectiveness of Selected Option(s) (S/PE removed) 14 65 185 aAlthough toxic weighing factors for priority pollutants varied across these rules, this table reflects the cost-effectiveness at the time of regulation. Industry has no known or expected indirect discharges. 'Reflects costs and removals of both air and water pollutants. dProposed. 4-3 ------- Appendix A Supporting Documentation for Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Pollutant Loadings Analysis ------- Table A-l Industry Loads and Removals By Pollutant CP-IL Option, No Cutoff Pollutant Code Til T37 N34 N38 N42 T22 N54 N58 AL SB AS BA N64 N66 BE T66 BOD B T67 CD COD T7 T23 CR CO CU T68 T69 T38 N90 FE T54 PB N95 MN HG T44 MO N102 N103 N104 N105 N106 N107 N114 N115 N116 N117 N118 T55 NI N119 HEM N125 N126 N130 T65 SE AG T85 TL SN TI T86 TOG SHEM TS T30 T87 V Y ZN Industry Baseline Industry Treated Analyte Load (Ibs/yr) Load (Ibs/yr) 1,1,1 -TRICHLOROETHANE 1 ,2-DIPHENYLHYDRAZINE 2-BUTANONE 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE 2-PROPANONE 4-CHLORO-3-METHYLPHENOL 4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE ALPHA-TERPrNEOL ALUMINUM ANTIMONY ARSENIC BARIUM BENZOIC ACID BENZYL ALCOHOL BERYLLIUM BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE BOD 5-DAY (CARBONACEOUS) BORON BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE CADMIUM CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND (COD) CHLOROBENZENE CHLOROFORM CHROMIUM COBALT COPPER DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE ETHYLBENZENE HEXANOIC ACID IRON ISOPHORONE LEAD M-XYLENE MANGANESE MERCURY METHYLENE CHLORIDE MOLYBDENUM N-DECANE N-DOCOSANE N-DODECANE N-EICOSANE N-HEXACOSANE N-HEXADECANE N-OCTACOSANE N-OCTADECANE N-TETRACOSANE N-TETRADECANE N-TRIACONTANE NAPHTHALENE NICKEL 0+P XYLENE OIL AND GREASE (AS HEM) P-CRESOL P-CYMENE PENTAMETHYLBENZENE PHENOL SELENIUM SILVER TETRACHLOROETHENE THALLIUM TIN TITANIUM TOLUENE TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON (TOC) TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS TRANS-1 ,2-DICHLOROETHENE TRICHLOROETHENE VANADIUM YTTRIUM ZINC Totals 44,354 0 37,079 11,420 139,704 10,048 15,946 11,666 731,628 27,706 13,064 72,023 68,837 71,863 39 143,930 111,166,461 34,933 39,666 5,345 259,751,769 2,487 128,187 15,303 4,940 132,972 16,435 13,633 38,046 8,077 1,275,369 47,778 73,428 17,712 25,269 182 29,221 9,542 673,669 16,653 186,284 146,471 16,085 88,172 10,047 71,627 22,929 112,400 15,088 41,634 15,287 11,110 38,519,591 0 52,508 0 12,686 403 4,535 42,301 0 5,854 17,716 66,379 78,340,477 13,109,842 62,531,426 3,358 2,971 2,040 783 199,400 568,575,789 24,961 0 35,068 3,026 85,958 3,544 15,946 7,759 491,296 17,615 13,050 50,147 68,837 52,597 37 79,273 102,558,482 33,031 13,169 3,077 197,873,919 1,708 127,943 9,375 2,809 72,944 4,787 10,108 12,064 8,072 531,645 24,228 27,292 14,657 12,823 161 11,728 9,488 347,700 5,872 128,584 12,320 4,279 24,316 3,877 11,910 8,936 21,622 7,456 19,075 10,686 9,824 15,314,139 0 14,907 0 12,685 247 3,428 27,571 0 2,595 11,656 51,536 72,196,038 2,377,260 32,147,990 3,358 1,757 1,822 771 68,172 425,165,014 POTW Removals Removals Removal After POTW (Ibs/yr) Efficiency (%) (Ibs/yr) 19,393 0 2,011 8,394 53,746 6,504 0 3,907 240,332 10,091 14 21,876 0 19,265 2 64,656 8,607,980 1,902 26,497 2,268 61,877,850 779 244 5,928 2,131 60,028 11,648 3,524 25,982 5 743,724 23,550 46,137 3,056 12,446 22 17,493 54 325,970 10,780 57,700 134,150 11,806 63,856 6,170 59,717 13,993 90,778 7,632 22,560 4,601 1,286 23,205,452 0 37,601 0 0 156 1,107 14,730 0 3,259 6,061 14,842 6,144,439 10,732,581 30,383,436 0 1,214 218 11 131,228 143,410,775 24% 62% 18% 28% 85% 63% 18% 18% 88% 72% 40% 35% 81% 33% 61% 60% 91% 14% 86% 91% 82% 24% 24% 91% 4% 84% 75% 33% 33% 33% 83% 62% 92% 33% 41% 33% 18% 52% 33% 94% 33% 33% 94% 33% 94% 33% 94% 33% 94% 18% 52% 33% 87% 72% 99% 91% 95% 34% 80% 33% 28% 65% 69% 33% 71% 74% 91% 33% 33% 42% 58% 77% 14,739 0 1,649 6,044 8,062 2,407 0 3,204 28,840 2,826 8 14,219 0 12,908 1 25,863 774,718 1,636 3,710 204 11,138,013 592 186 534 2,046 9,604 2,912 2,361 17,408 4 126,433 8,949 3,691 2,047 7,343 15 14,344 26 218,400 647 38,659 89,881 708 42,784 370 40,010 840 60,821 458 18,499 2,208 861 3,016,709 0 376 0 0 103 221 9,869 0 1,140 1,879 9,944 1,781,887 2,790,471 2,734,509 0 813 126 5 30,182 23,130,926 Toxic Weighting PE Factor Removals 4.30E-003 1.20E+000 2.20E-005 1.80E-002 7.60E-006 4.30E-003 1.20E-004 l.OOE-003 6.40E-002 1.90E-001 4.00E+000 2.00E-003 3.30E-004 5.60E-003 5.30E+000 1.10E-001 O.OOE+000 1.80E-001 2.30E-002 5.20E+000 O.OOE+000 2.90E-003 2.10E-003 2.70E-002 1.10E-001 4.70E-001 1.20E-002 2.20E-001 1.40E-003 3.40E-004 5.60E-003 7.30E-004 1.80E+000 1.50E-003 1.40E-002 5.00E+002 4.20E-004 2.00E-001 4.30E-003 8.20E-005 4.30E-003 4.30E-003 8.20E-005 4.30E-003 8.20E-005 4.30E-003 8.20E-005 4.30E-003 8.20E-005 1.50E-002 3.60E-002 8.50E-003 O.OOE+000 2.40E-003 4.30E-002 2.90E-001 2.80E-002 1.10E+000 4.70E+001 7.40E-002 1.40E-001 3.00E-001 2.90E-002 5.60E-003 O.OOE+000 O.OOE+000 O.OOE+000 9.30E-005 6.30E-002 6.20E-001 O.OOE+000 5.10E-002 63 0 0 109 0 10 0 3 1,846 537 34 28 0 72 4 2,845 0 294 85 1,061 0 2 0 14 225 4,514 35 519 24 0 708 7 6,644 3 103 7,254 6 5 939 0 166 386 0 184 0 172 0 262 0 277 80 7 0 0 16 0 0 113 10,406 730 0 342 54 56 0 0 0 0 51 78 0 1,539 42,917 Source: Development Document. A-l ------- Table A-2 Industry Loads and Removals By Pollutant CP-IL Option, 1MM/25SK Cutoff Pollutant Code Til T37 N34 N38 N42 T22 N54 N58 AL SB AS BA N64 N66 BE T66 BOD B T67 CD COD T7 T23 CR CO CU T68 T69 T38 N90 FE T54 PB N95 MN HG T44 MO N102 N103 N104 N105 N106 N107 N114 N115 N116 N117 N118 T55 NI N119 HEM N125 N126 N130 T65 SE AG T85 TL SN TI T86 TOG SHEM TS T30 T87 V Y ZN Industry Baseline Industry Treated Analyte Load (Ibs/yr) Load (Ibs/yr) 1,1,1 -TRICHLOROETHANE 1 ,2-DIPHENYLHYDRAZINE 2-BUTANONE 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE 2-PROPANONE 4-CHLORO-3-METHYLPHENOL 4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE ALPHA-TERPrNEOL ALUMINUM ANTIMONY ARSENIC BARIUM BENZOIC ACID BENZYL ALCOHOL BERYLLIUM BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE BOD 5-DAY (CARBONACEOUS) BORON BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE CADMIUM CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND (COD) CHLOROBENZENE CHLOROFORM CHROMIUM COBALT COPPER DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE ETHYLBENZENE HEXANOIC ACID IRON ISOPHORONE LEAD M-XYLENE MANGANESE MERCURY METHYLENE CHLORIDE MOLYBDENUM N-DECANE N-DOCOSANE N-DODECANE N-EICOSANE N-HEXACOSANE N-HEXADECANE N-OCTACOSANE N-OCTADECANE N-TETRACOSANE N-TETRADECANE N-TRIACONTANE NAPHTHALENE NICKEL 0+P XYLENE OIL AND GREASE (AS HEM) P-CRESOL P-CYMENE PENTAMETHYLBENZENE PHENOL SELENIUM SILVER TETRACHLOROETHENE THALLIUM TIN TITANIUM TOLUENE TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON (TOC) TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS TRANS-1 ,2-DICHLOROETHENE TRICHLOROETHENE VANADIUM YTTRIUM ZINC Totals 43,682 0 36,490 11,262 137,556 9,930 15,687 11,504 726,162 27,540 12,972 71,175 68,136 70,980 39 142,454 110,170,372 34,572 39,223 5,281 256,658,823 2,448 127,263 15,133 4,879 131,381 16,193 13,478 37,203 8,033 1,263,722 47,075 72,288 17,418 25,012 181 28,698 9,423 663,185 16,466 183,028 143,083 15,821 86,604 9,903 70,187 22,677 110,160 14,928 40,915 15,148 10,933 37,893,390 0 51,855 0 12,588 400 4,494 41,317 0 5,799 17,597 65,145 77,640,746 12,851,536 61,742,432 3,308 2,929 2,024 777 197,065 562,050,106 24,791 0 34,548 3,006 85,282 3,523 15,687 7,707 487,891 17,494 12,958 49,799 68,136 52,268 37 78,718 101,859,551 32,796 13,078 3,056 196,546,125 1,695 127,041 9,312 2,791 72,449 4,754 10,038 11,985 8,027 528,021 24,095 27,106 14,553 12,734 160 11,651 9,393 345,248 5,832 127,690 12,235 4,250 24,147 3,850 11,828 8,874 21,472 7,403 18,944 10,613 9,746 15,207,566 0 14,803 0 12,587 246 3,405 27,387 0 2,578 11,575 51,127 71,706,500 2,361,108 31,926,179 3,308 1,743 1,810 766 67,710 422,284,785 POTW Removals Removals Removal After POTW (Ibs/yr) Efficiency (%) (Ibs/yr) 18,890 0 1,942 8,257 52,274 6,406 0 3,798 238,270 10,046 14 21,376 0 18,712 2 63,736 8,310,821 1,776 26,146 2,226 60,112,698 753 221 5,821 2,089 58,932 11,440 3,440 25,217 5 735,701 22,979 45,182 2,865 12,279 21 17,047 30 317,937 10,635 55,338 130,848 11,572 62,457 6,053 58,359 13,803 88,689 7,524 21,972 4,535 1,186 22,685,824 0 37,052 0 0 154 1,089 13,930 0 3,221 6,022 14,018 5,934,246 10,490,428 29,816,253 0 1,186 214 11 129,355 139,765,321 24% 62% 18% 28% 85% 63% 18% 18% 88% 72% 40% 35% 81% 33% 61% 60% 91% 14% 86% 91% 82% 24% 24% 91% 4% 84% 75% 33% 33% 33% 83% 62% 92% 33% 41% 33% 18% 52% 33% 94% 33% 33% 94% 33% 94% 33% 94% 33% 94% 18% 52% 33% 87% 72% 99% 91% 95% 34% 80% 33% 28% 65% 69% 33% 71% 74% 91% 33% 33% 42% 58% 77% 14,357 0 1,592 5,945 7,841 2,370 0 3,114 28,592 2,813 8 13,894 0 12,537 1 25,494 747,974 1,527 3,660 200 10,820,286 572 168 524 2,005 9,429 2,860 2,305 16,896 4 125,069 8,732 3,615 1,919 7,244 14 13,978 15 213,018 638 37,076 87,668 694 41,846 363 39,100 828 59,421 451 18,017 2,177 795 2,949,157 0 371 0 0 102 218 9,333 0 1,128 1,867 9,392 1,720,931 2,727,511 2,683,463 0 794 124 5 29,752 22,523,797 Toxic Weighting PE Factor Removals 4.30E-003 1.20E+000 2.20E-005 1.80E-002 7.60E-006 4.30E-003 1.20E-004 l.OOE-003 6.40E-002 1.90E-001 4.00E+000 2.00E-003 3.30E-004 5.60E-003 5.30E+000 1.10E-001 O.OOE+000 1.80E-001 2.30E-002 5.20E+000 O.OOE+000 2.90E-003 2.10E-003 2.70E-002 1.10E-001 4.70E-001 1.20E-002 2.20E-001 1.40E-003 3.40E-004 5.60E-003 7.30E-004 1.80E+000 1.50E-003 1.40E-002 5.00E+002 4.20E-004 2.00E-001 4.30E-003 8.20E-005 4.30E-003 4.30E-003 8.20E-005 4.30E-003 8.20E-005 4.30E-003 8.20E-005 4.30E-003 8.20E-005 1.50E-002 3.60E-002 8.50E-003 O.OOE+000 2.40E-003 4.30E-002 2.90E-001 2.80E-002 1.10E+000 4.70E+001 7.40E-002 1.40E-001 3.00E-001 2.90E-002 5.60E-003 O.OOE+000 O.OOE+000 O.OOE+000 9.30E-005 6.30E-002 6.20E-001 O.OOE+000 5.10E-002 62 0 0 107 0 10 0 3 1,830 534 33 28 0 70 4 2,804 0 275 84 1,042 0 2 0 14 221 4,432 34 507 24 0 700 6 6,506 3 101 7,154 6 3 916 0 159 377 0 180 0 168 0 256 0 270 78 7 0 0 16 0 0 112 10,236 691 0 338 54 53 0 0 0 0 50 77 0 1,517 42,155 Source: Development Document. A-2 ------- Table A-3 Industry Loads and Removals By Pollutant CP-IL Option, 3MM/120K Cutoff Pollutant Code Til T37 N34 N38 N42 T22 N54 N58 AL SB AS BA N64 N66 BE T66 BOD B T67 CD COD T7 T23 CR CO CU T68 T69 T38 N90 FE T54 PB N95 MN HG T44 MO N102 N103 N104 N105 N106 N107 N114 N115 N116 N117 N118 T55 NI N119 HEM N125 N126 N130 T65 SE AG T85 TL SN TI T86 TOG SHEM TS T30 T87 V Y ZN Industry Baseline Industry Treated Analyte Load (Ibs/yr) Load (Ibs/yr) 1,1,1 -TRICHLOROETHANE 1 ,2-DIPHENYLHYDRAZINE 2-BUTANONE 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE 2-PROPANONE 4-CHLORO-3-METHYLPHENOL 4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE ALPHA-TERPrNEOL ALUMINUM ANTIMONY ARSENIC BARIUM BENZOIC ACID BENZYL ALCOHOL BERYLLIUM BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE BOD 5-DAY (CARBONACEOUS) BORON BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE CADMIUM CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND (COD) CHLOROBENZENE CHLOROFORM CHROMIUM COBALT COPPER DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE ETHYLBENZENE HEXANOIC ACID IRON ISOPHORONE LEAD M-XYLENE MANGANESE MERCURY METHYLENE CHLORIDE MOLYBDENUM N-DECANE N-DOCOSANE N-DODECANE N-EICOSANE N-HEXACOSANE N-HEXADECANE N-OCTACOSANE N-OCTADECANE N-TETRACOSANE N-TETRADECANE N-TRIACONTANE NAPHTHALENE NICKEL 0+P XYLENE OIL AND GREASE (AS HEM) P-CRESOL P-CYMENE PENTAMETHYLBENZENE PHENOL SELENIUM SILVER TETRACHLOROETHENE THALLIUM TIN TITANIUM TOLUENE TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON (TOC) TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS TRANS-1 ,2-DICHLOROETHENE TRICHLOROETHENE VANADIUM YTTRIUM ZINC Totals 40,464 0 33,983 10,198 131,729 8,850 14,651 10,908 669,275 25,088 12,470 66,280 63,203 66,640 34 132,825 104,120,680 32,242 37,307 4,886 236,114,575 2,334 122,751 14,070 4,594 121,275 15,102 12,588 34,107 7,312 1,143,483 43,507 66,481 16,244 22,988 170 26,294 8,980 624,681 14,748 165,833 128,002 14,359 78,869 8,887 62,912 20,654 99,447 13,750 38,379 13,973 10,270 35,269,760 0 49,931 0 11,871 352 4,250 37,725 0 5,133 16,066 61,674 72,968,740 11,766,277 56,330,170 3,146 2,820 1,890 737 178,466 521,262,341 21,771 0 32,042 2,809 79,572 3,084 14,651 7,153 459,847 16,613 12,457 46,738 63,203 48,148 32 75,404 95,859,747 30,466 12,546 2,886 179,609,548 1,582 122,530 8,606 2,540 67,715 4,507 9,410 10,354 7,306 495,084 21,043 25,349 13,392 12,027 151 10,235 8,949 332,492 5,537 112,032 11,687 3,996 22,975 3,577 11,169 8,464 20,406 7,045 17,820 9,914 9,084 14,441,421 0 14,211 0 11,871 215 3,224 24,074 0 2,238 10,776 47,706 67,073,873 2,195,097 29,835,581 3,146 1,634 1,684 726 62,860 391,526,031 POTW Removals Removals Removal After POTW (Ibs/yr) Efficiency (%) (Ibs/yr) 18,694 0 1,942 7,389 52,157 5,766 0 3,755 209,428 8,475 14 19,542 0 18,492 2 57,420 8,260,933 1,776 24,761 2,000 56,505,027 753 221 5,464 2,054 53,560 10,595 3,178 23,753 5 648,399 22,464 41,131 2,853 10,961 19 16,059 30 292,189 9,212 53,801 116,315 10,363 55,894 5,311 51,743 12,190 79,041 6,705 20,559 4,059 1,186 20,828,339 0 35,720 0 0 137 1,026 13,650 0 2,895 5,290 13,968 5,894,867 9,571,180 26,494,589 0 1,186 205 11 115,606 129,736,310 24% 62% 18% 28% 85% 63% 18% 18% 88% 72% 40% 35% 81% 33% 61% 60% 91% 14% 86% 91% 82% 24% 24% 91% 4% 84% 75% 33% 33% 33% 83% 62% 92% 33% 41% 33% 18% 52% 33% 94% 33% 33% 94% 33% 94% 33% 94% 33% 94% 18% 52% 33% 87% 72% 99% 91% 95% 34% 80% 33% 28% 65% 69% 33% 71% 74% 91% 33% 33% 42% 58% 77% 14,207 0 1,592 5,320 7,824 2,133 0 3,079 25,131 2,373 8 12,702 0 12,390 1 22,968 743,484 1,527 3,467 180 10,170,905 572 168 492 1,972 8,570 2,649 2,129 15,914 4 110,228 8,536 3,291 1,911 6,467 13 13,169 15 195,767 553 36,047 77,931 622 37,449 319 34,668 731 52,958 402 16,859 1,948 795 2,707,684 0 357 0 0 91 205 9,146 0 1,013 1,640 9,358 1,709,511 2,488,507 2,384,513 0 794 119 5 26,589 21,001,969 Toxic Weighting PE Factor Removals 4.30E-003 1.20E+000 2.20E-005 1.80E-002 7.60E-006 4.30E-003 1.20E-004 l.OOE-003 6.40E-002 1.90E-001 4.00E+000 2.00E-003 3.30E-004 5.60E-003 5.30E+000 1.10E-001 O.OOE+000 1.80E-001 2.30E-002 5.20E+000 O.OOE+000 2.90E-003 2.10E-003 2.70E-002 1.10E-001 4.70E-001 1.20E-002 2.20E-001 1.40E-003 3.40E-004 5.60E-003 7.30E-004 1.80E+000 1.50E-003 1.40E-002 5.00E+002 4.20E-004 2.00E-001 4.30E-003 8.20E-005 4.30E-003 4.30E-003 8.20E-005 4.30E-003 8.20E-005 4.30E-003 8.20E-005 4.30E-003 8.20E-005 1.50E-002 3.60E-002 8.50E-003 O.OOE+000 2.40E-003 4.30E-002 2.90E-001 2.80E-002 1.10E+000 4.70E+001 7.40E-002 1.40E-001 3.00E-001 2.90E-002 5.60E-003 O.OOE+000 O.OOE+000 O.OOE+000 9.30E-005 6.30E-002 6.20E-001 O.OOE+000 5.10E-002 61 0 0 96 0 9 0 3 1,608 451 33 25 0 69 4 2,526 0 275 80 936 0 2 0 13 217 4,028 32 468 22 0 617 6 5,923 3 91 6,356 6 3 842 0 155 335 0 161 0 149 0 228 0 253 70 7 0 0 15 0 0 100 9,643 677 0 304 48 52 0 0 0 0 50 74 0 1,356 38,483 Source: Development Document. A-3 ------- Table A-4 Industry Loads and Removals By Pollutant CP-IL Option, SMM/25SK Cutoff Pollutant Code Til T37 N34 N38 N42 T22 N54 N58 AL SB AS BA N64 N66 BE T66 BOD B T67 CD COD T7 T23 CR CO CU T68 T69 T38 N90 FE T54 PB N95 MN HG T44 MO N102 N103 N104 N105 N106 N107 N114 N115 N116 N117 N118 T55 NI N119 HEM N125 N126 N130 T65 SE AG T85 TL SN TI T86 TOG SHEM TS T30 T87 V Y ZN Industry Baseline Industry Treated Analyte Load (Ibs/yr) Load (Ibs/yr) 1,1,1 -TRICHLOROETHANE 1 ,2-DIPHENYLHYDRAZINE 2-BUTANONE 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE 2-PROPANONE 4-CHLORO-3-METHYLPHENOL 4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE ALPHA-TERPrNEOL ALUMINUM ANTIMONY ARSENIC BARIUM BENZOIC ACID BENZYL ALCOHOL BERYLLIUM BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE BOD 5-DAY (CARBONACEOUS) BORON BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE CADMIUM CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND (COD) CHLOROBENZENE CHLOROFORM CHROMIUM COBALT COPPER DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE ETHYLBENZENE HEXANOIC ACID IRON ISOPHORONE LEAD M-XYLENE MANGANESE MERCURY METHYLENE CHLORIDE MOLYBDENUM N-DECANE N-DOCOSANE N-DODECANE N-EICOSANE N-HEXACOSANE N-HEXADECANE N-OCTACOSANE N-OCTADECANE N-TETRACOSANE N-TETRADECANE N-TRIACONTANE NAPHTHALENE NICKEL 0+P XYLENE OIL AND GREASE (AS HEM) P-CRESOL P-CYMENE PENTAMETHYLBENZENE PHENOL SELENIUM SILVER TETRACHLOROETHENE THALLIUM TIN TITANIUM TOLUENE TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON (TOC) TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS TRANS-1 ,2-DICHLOROETHENE TRICHLOROETHENE VANADIUM YTTRIUM ZINC Totals 33,432 0 28,704 8,074 113,260 6,888 12,341 9,354 537,651 19,694 10,704 54,111 52,420 56,807 26 107,755 87,450,551 26,941 32,124 4,002 189,588,950 2,053 105,870 11,402 3,907 97,610 12,228 10,317 26,947 5,762 895,613 36,677 53,467 13,596 18,489 141 21,649 7,642 517,127 11,271 128,980 99,826 11,166 62,162 6,844 48,883 16,413 77,866 11,128 31,341 11,300 8,716 28,563,674 0 43,735 0 9,985 264 3,591 30,356 0 3,893 12,641 51,118 60,704,055 9,349,866 44,708,381 2,793 2,543 1,556 621 141,259 424,150,513 15,838 0 26,763 2,277 64,625 2,122 12,341 5,750 379,438 13,900 10,691 38,159 52,420 38,730 24 64,163 79,935,733 25,173 10,699 2,393 140,233,731 1,320 105,654 6,840 1,970 55,004 3,762 7,673 6,884 5,757 404,754 14,969 20,616 10,891 9,966 126 7,229 7,614 285,672 4,633 81,131 9,894 3,280 19,295 2,858 9,244 7,146 17,101 5,916 14,635 8,050 7,570 12,089,837 0 12,142 0 9,984 151 2,685 17,410 0 1,552 8,672 38,492 55,307,428 1,763,841 24,186,232 2,793 1,375 1,375 612 50,361 315,577,367 POTW Removals Removals Removal After POTW (Ibs/yr) Efficiency (%) (Ibs/yr) 17,593 0 1,942 5,798 48,634 4,766 0 3,604 158,214 5,794 13 15,952 0 18,077 2 43,592 7,514,818 1,767 21,425 1,608 49,355,219 733 216 4,562 1,936 42,605 8,465 2,644 20,064 5 490,858 21,708 32,851 2,706 8,523 15 14,420 28 231,455 6,638 47,849 89,933 7,885 42,867 3,987 39,639 9,267 60,765 5,212 16,706 3,251 1,146 16,473,837 0 31,593 0 0 114 906 12,945 0 2,341 3,969 12,626 5,396,627 7,586,025 20,522,150 0 1,168 181 10 90,897 108,573,146 24% 62% 18% 28% 85% 63% 18% 18% 88% 72% 40% 35% 81% 33% 61% 60% 91% 14% 86% 91% 82% 24% 24% 91% 4% 84% 75% 33% 33% 33% 83% 62% 92% 33% 41% 33% 18% 52% 33% 94% 33% 33% 94% 33% 94% 33% 94% 33% 94% 18% 52% 33% 87% 72% 99% 91% 95% 34% 80% 33% 28% 65% 69% 33% 71% 74% 91% 33% 33% 42% 58% 77% 13,371 0 1,592 4,174 7,295 1,764 0 2,955 18,986 1,622 8 10,369 0 12,111 1 17,437 676,334 1,520 2,999 145 8,883,939 557 165 411 1,859 6,817 2,116 1,771 13,443 4 83,446 8,249 2,628 1,813 5,028 10 11,824 14 155,075 398 32,059 60,255 473 28,721 239 26,558 556 40,712 313 13,699 1,560 768 2,141,599 0 316 0 0 75 181 8,673 0 819 1,230 8,460 1,565,022 1,972,367 1,846,993 0 783 105 4 20,906 17,725,696 Toxic Weighting PE Factor Removals 4.30E-003 1.20E+000 2.20E-005 1.80E-002 7.60E-006 4.30E-003 1.20E-004 l.OOE-003 6.40E-002 1.90E-001 4.00E+000 2.00E-003 3.30E-004 5.60E-003 5.30E+000 1.10E-001 O.OOE+000 1.80E-001 2.30E-002 5.20E+000 O.OOE+000 2.90E-003 2.10E-003 2.70E-002 1.10E-001 4.70E-001 1.20E-002 2.20E-001 1.40E-003 3.40E-004 5.60E-003 7.30E-004 1.80E+000 1.50E-003 1.40E-002 5.00E+002 4.20E-004 2.00E-001 4.30E-003 8.20E-005 4.30E-003 4.30E-003 8.20E-005 4.30E-003 8.20E-005 4.30E-003 8.20E-005 4.30E-003 8.20E-005 1.50E-002 3.60E-002 8.50E-003 O.OOE+000 2.40E-003 4.30E-002 2.90E-001 2.80E-002 1.10E+000 4.70E+001 7.40E-002 1.40E-001 3.00E-001 2.90E-002 5.60E-003 O.OOE+000 O.OOE+000 O.OOE+000 9.30E-005 6.30E-002 6.20E-001 O.OOE+000 5.10E-002 57 0 0 75 0 8 0 3 1,215 308 31 21 0 68 4 1,918 0 274 69 753 0 2 0 11 204 3,204 25 390 19 0 467 6 4,731 3 70 4,953 5 3 667 0 138 259 0 124 0 114 0 175 0 205 56 7 0 0 14 0 0 82 8,514 642 0 246 36 47 0 0 0 0 49 65 0 1,066 31,403 Source: Development Document. A-4 ------- Industry Loads and Removals By Pollutant DAF-IL Option, No Cutoff Pollutant Code Til T37 N34 N38 N42 T22 N54 N58 AL SB AS BA N64 N66 BE T66 BOD B T67 CD COD T7 T23 CR CO CU T68 T69 T38 N90 FE T54 PB N95 MN HO T44 MO N102 N103 N104 N105 N106 N107 N114 N115 N116 N117 N118 T55 NI N119 HEM N125 N126 N130 T65 SE AO T85 TL SN TI T86 TOG SHEM TS T30 T87 V Y ZN Industry Baseline Industry Treated Analyte Load (Ibs/yr) Load (Ibs/yr) 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 1,2-DIPHENYLHYDRAZINE 2-BUTANONE 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE 2-PROPANONE 4-CHLORO-3-METHYLPHENOL 4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE ALPHA-TERPINEOL ALUMINUM ANTIMONY ARSENIC BARIUM BENZOIC ACID BENZYL ALCOHOL BERYLLIUM BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE BOD 5-DAY (CARBONACEOUS) BORON BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE CADMIUM CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND (COD) CHLOROBENZENE CHLOROFORM CHROMIUM COBALT COPPER DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE ETHYLBENZENE HEXANOIC ACID IRON ISOPHORONE LEAD M-XYLENE MANGANESE MERCURY METHYLENE CHLORIDE MOLYBDENUM N-DECANE N-DOCOSANE N-DODECANE N-EICOSANE N-HEXACOSANE N-HEXADECANE N-OCTACOSANE N-OCTADECANE N-TETRACOSANE N-TETRADECANE N-TRIACONTANE NAPHTHALENE NICKEL O+P XYLENE OIL AND GREASE (AS HEM) P-CRESOL P-CYMENE PENTAMETHYLBENZENE PHENOL SELENIUM SILVER TETRACHLOROETHENE THALLIUM TIN TITANIUM TOLUENE TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON (TOC) TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE TRICHLOROETHENE VANADIUM YTTRIUM ZINC Totals 44,354 0 37,079 11,420 139,704 10,048 15,946 11,666 731,628 27,706 13,064 72,023 68,837 71,863 39 143,930 111,166,461 34,933 39,666 5,345 259,751,769 2,487 128,187 15,303 4,940 132,972 16,435 13,633 38,046 8,077 1,275,369 47,778 73,428 17,712 25,269 182 29,221 9,542 673,669 16,653 186,284 146,471 16,085 88,172 10,047 71,627 22,929 112,400 15,088 41,634 15,287 11,110 38,519,591 0 52,508 0 12,686 403 4,535 42,301 0 5,854 17,716 66,379 78,340,477 13,109,842 62,531,426 3,358 2,971 2,040 783 199,400 568,575,789 2,377 0 37,078 9,803 139,280 9,364 15,786 11,643 489,482 19,540 13,063 43,084 68,014 71,862 39 85,188 105,943,546 34,376 25,872 3,607 180,887,567 1,616 128,182 11,193 3,704 89,894 12,065 9,687 5,741 8,077 614,767 47,778 33,574 16,512 12,989 155 27,554 8,803 377,128 6,818 52,336 14,929 4,796 27,715 3,383 15,051 9,701 24,465 7,317 20,447 10,763 10,799 16,035,628 0 19,495 0 12,678 403 4,063 20,512 0 4,934 9,132 46,162 72,858,026 2,671,268 29,879,620 3,358 2,971 1,790 740 112,848 411,212,139 POTW Removals Removals Removal After POTW (Ibs/yr) Efficiency (%) (Ibs/yr) 41,976 0 0 1,618 424 684 159 23 242,147 8,167 0 28,939 823 0 0 58,741 5,222,915 557 13,795 1,737 78,864,203 871 5 4,110 1,237 43,078 4,370 3,946 32,305 0 660,602 0 39,854 1,200 12,280 28 1,667 740 296,541 9,834 133,947 131,541 11,289 60,457 6,664 56,576 13,228 87,934 7,771 21,188 4,524 311 22,483,963 0 33,013 0 7 0 472 21,790 0 920 8,584 20,217 5,482,451 10,438,574 32,651,807 0 0 249 42 86,553 157,363,650 24% 62% 18% 28% 85% 63% 18% 18% 88% 72% 40% 35% 81% 33% 61% 60% 91% 14% 86% 91% 82% 24% 24% 91% 4% 84% 75% 33% 33% 33% 83% 62% 92% 33% 41% 33% 18% 52% 33% 94% 33% 33% 94% 33% 94% 33% 94% 33% 94% 18% 52% 33% 87% 72% 99% 91% 95% 34% 80% 33% 28% 65% 69% 33% 71% 74% 91% 33% 33% 42% 58% 77% 31,902 0 0 1,165 64 253 131 19 29,058 2,287 0 18,811 156 0 0 23,497 470,062 479 1,931 156 14,195,556 662 4 370 1,187 6,892 1,092 2,644 21,645 0 112,302 0 3,188 804 7,245 18 1,367 355 198,683 590 89,745 88,133 677 40,506 400 37,906 794 58,916 466 17,374 2,172 209 2,922,915 0 330 0 0 0 94 14,599 0 322 2,661 13,545 1,589,911 2,714,029 2,938,663 0 0 145 18 19,907 25,689,012 Toxic Weighting PE Factor Removals 4.30E-003 1.20E+000 2.20E-005 1.80E-002 7.60E-006 4.30E-003 1.20E-004 l.OOE-003 6.40E-002 1.90E-001 4.00E+000 2.00E-003 3.30E-004 5.60E-003 5.30E+000 1.10E-001 O.OOE+000 1.80E-001 2.30E-002 5.20E+000 O.OOE+000 2.90E-003 2.10E-003 2.70E-002 1.10E-001 4.70E-001 1.20E-002 2.20E-001 1.40E-003 3.40E-004 5.60E-003 7.30E-004 1.80E+000 1.50E-003 1.40E-002 5.00E+002 4.20E-004 2.00E-001 4.30E-003 8.20E-005 4.30E-003 4.30E-003 8.20E-005 4.30E-003 8.20E-005 4.30E-003 8.20E-005 4.30E-003 8.20E-005 1.50E-002 3.60E-002 8.50E-003 O.OOE+000 2.40E-003 4.30E-002 2.90E-001 2.80E-002 1.10E+000 4.70E+001 7.40E-002 1.40E-001 3.00E-001 2.90E-002 5.60E-003 O.OOE+000 O.OOE+000 O.OOE+000 9.30E-005 6.30E-002 6.20E-001 O.OOE+000 5.10E-002 137 0 0 21 0 1 0 0 1,860 434 1 38 0 0 0 2,585 0 86 44 813 0 2 0 10 131 3,239 13 582 30 0 629 0 5,739 1 101 9,239 1 71 854 0 386 379 0 174 0 163 0 253 0 261 78 2 0 0 14 0 0 0 4,437 1,080 0 97 77 76 0 0 0 0 0 90 0 1,015 35,245 Source: Development Document. ------- Industry Loads and Removals By Pollutant DAF-IL Option, 1MM/255K Cutoff Pollutant Code Til T37 N34 N38 N42 T22 N54 N58 AL SB AS BA N64 N66 BE T66 BOD B T67 CD COD T7 T23 CR CO CU T68 T69 T38 N90 FE T54 PB N95 MN HO T44 MO N102 N103 N104 N105 N106 N107 N114 N115 N116 N117 N118 T55 NI N119 HEM N125 N126 N130 T65 SE AO T85 TL SN TI T86 TOC SHEM TS T30 T87 V Y ZN Industry Baseline Industry Treated Analyte Load (Ibs/yr) Load (Ibs/yr) 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 1,2-DIPHENYLHYDRAZINE 2-BUTANONE 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE 2-PROPANONE 4-CHLORO-3-METHYLPHENOL 4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE ALPHA-TERPINEOL ALUMINUM ANTIMONY ARSENIC BARIUM BENZOIC ACID BENZYL ALCOHOL BERYLLIUM BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE BOD 5-DAY (CARBONACEOUS) BORON BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE CADMIUM CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND (COD) CHLOROBENZENE CHLOROFORM CHROMIUM COBALT COPPER DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE ETHYLBENZENE HEXANOIC ACID IRON ISOPHORONE LEAD M-XYLENE MANGANESE MERCURY METHYLENE CHLORIDE MOLYBDENUM N-DECANE N-DOCOSANE N-DODECANE N-EICOSANE N-HEXACOSANE N-HEXADECANE N-OCTACOSANE N-OCTADECANE N-TETRACOSANE N-TETRADECANE N-TRIACONTANE NAPHTHALENE NICKEL O+P XYLENE OIL AND GREASE (AS HEM) P-CRESOL P-CYMENE PENTAMETHYLBENZENE PHENOL SELENIUM SILVER TETRACHLOROETHENE THALLIUM TIN TITANIUM TOLUENE TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON (TOC) TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE TRICHLOROETHENE VANADIUM YTTRIUM ZINC Totals 43,682 0 36,490 11,262 137,556 9,930 15,687 11,504 726,162 27,540 12,972 71,175 68,136 70,980 39 142,454 110,170,372 34,572 39,223 5,281 256,658,823 2,448 127,263 15,133 4,879 131,381 16,193 13,478 37,203 8,033 1,263,722 47,075 72,288 17,418 25,012 181 28,698 9,423 663,185 16,466 183,028 143,083 15,821 86,604 9,903 70,187 22,677 110,160 14,928 40,915 15,148 10,933 37,893,390 0 51,855 0 12,588 400 4,494 41,317 0 5,799 17,597 65,145 77,640,746 12,851,536 61,742,432 3,308 2,929 2,024 777 197,065 562,050,106 2,372 0 36,490 9,731 137,160 9,309 15,573 11,482 486,090 19,407 12,972 42,786 67,346 70,980 39 84,589 105,209,109 34,111 25,686 3,583 179,662,938 1,605 127,257 11,119 3,678 89,281 11,978 9,620 5,705 8,033 610,539 47,075 33,345 16,380 12,899 154 27,348 8,734 374,463 6,771 52,010 14,825 4,763 27,522 3,360 14,946 9,633 24,295 7,266 20,306 10,689 10,696 15,923,719 0 19,359 0 12,580 400 4,035 20,388 0 4,903 9,069 45,834 72,361,602 2,653,006 29,673,939 3,308 2,929 1,778 735 112,070 408,397,699 POTW Removals Removals Removal After POTW (Ibs/yr) Efficiency (%) (Ibs/yr) 41,310 0 0 1,531 396 621 114 23 240,072 8,132 0 28,389 790 0 0 57,865 4,961,263 460 13,537 1,699 76,995,885 843 5 4,014 1,201 42,100 4,216 3,858 31,498 0 653,182 0 38,943 1,038 12,114 27 1,349 690 288,722 9,696 131,018 128,258 11,058 59,082 6,544 55,240 13,044 85,866 7,662 20,609 4,459 237 21,969,671 0 32,496 0 7 0 459 20,929 0 897 8,528 19,311 5,279,144 10,198,530 32,068,493 0 0 245 42 84,995 153,652,407 24% 62% 18% 28% 85% 63% 18% 18% 88% 72% 40% 35% 81% 33% 61% 60% 91% 14% 86% 91% 82% 24% 24% 91% 4% 84% 75% 33% 33% 33% 83% 62% 92% 33% 41% 33% 18% 52% 33% 94% 33% 33% 94% 33% 94% 33% 94% 33% 94% 18% 52% 33% 87% 72% 99% 91% 95% 34% 80% 33% 28% 65% 69% 33% 71% 74% 91% 33% 33% 42% 58% 77% 31,396 0 0 1,102 59 230 93 19 28,809 2,277 0 18,453 150 0 0 23,146 446,514 396 1,895 153 13,859,259 641 4 361 1,153 6,736 1,054 2,585 21,104 0 111,041 0 3,115 696 7,147 18 1,106 331 193,444 582 87,782 85,933 664 39,585 393 37,011 783 57,530 460 16,900 2,140 159 2,856,057 0 325 0 0 0 92 14,023 0 314 2,644 12,938 1,530,952 2,651,618 2,886,164 0 0 142 18 19,549 25,069,242 Toxic Weighting PE Factor Removals 4.30E-003 1.20E+000 2.20E-005 1.80E-002 7.60E-006 4.30E-003 1.20E-004 l.OOE-003 6.40E-002 1.90E-001 4.00E+000 2.00E-003 3.30E-004 5.60E-003 5.30E+000 1.10E-001 O.OOE+000 1.80E-001 2.30E-002 5.20E+000 O.OOE+000 2.90E-003 2.10E-003 2.70E-002 1.10E-001 4.70E-001 1.20E-002 2.20E-001 1.40E-003 3.40E-004 5.60E-003 7.30E-004 1.80E+000 1.50E-003 1.40E-002 5.00E+002 4.20E-004 2.00E-001 4.30E-003 8.20E-005 4.30E-003 4.30E-003 8.20E-005 4.30E-003 8.20E-005 4.30E-003 8.20E-005 4.30E-003 8.20E-005 1.50E-002 3.60E-002 8.50E-003 O.OOE+000 2.40E-003 4.30E-002 2.90E-001 2.80E-002 1.10E+000 4.70E+001 7.40E-002 1.40E-001 3.00E-001 2.90E-002 5.60E-003 O.OOE+000 O.OOE+000 O.OOE+000 9.30E-005 6.30E-002 6.20E-001 O.OOE+000 5.10E-002 135 0 0 20 0 1 0 0 1,844 433 1 37 0 0 0 2,546 0 71 44 795 0 2 0 10 127 3,166 13 569 30 0 622 0 5,608 1 100 9,125 0 66 832 0 377 370 0 170 0 159 0 247 0 253 77 1 0 0 14 0 0 0 4,311 1,038 0 94 77 72 0 0 0 0 0 88 0 997 34,542 Source: Development Document. ------- Industry Loads and Removals By Pollutant DAF-IL Option, 3MM/120K Cutoff Pollutant Code Til T37 N34 N38 N42 T22 N54 N58 AL SB AS BA N64 N66 BE T66 BOD B T67 CD COD T7 T23 CR CO CU T68 T69 T38 N90 FE T54 PB N95 MN HO T44 MO N102 N103 N104 N105 N106 N107 N114 N115 N116 N117 N118 T55 NI N119 HEM N125 N126 N130 T65 SE AO T85 TL SN TI T86 TOC SHEM TS T30 T87 V Y ZN Industry Baseline Industry Treated Analyte Load (Ibs/yr) Load (Ibs/yr) 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 1,2-DIPHENYLHYDRAZINE 2-BUTANONE 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE 2-PROPANONE 4-CHLORO-3-METHYLPHENOL 4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE ALPHA-TERPINEOL ALUMINUM ANTIMONY ARSENIC BARIUM BENZOIC ACID BENZYL ALCOHOL BERYLLIUM BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE BOD 5-DAY (CARBONACEOUS) BORON BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE CADMIUM CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND (COD) CHLOROBENZENE CHLOROFORM CHROMIUM COBALT COPPER DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE ETHYLBENZENE HEXANOIC ACID IRON ISOPHORONE LEAD M-XYLENE MANGANESE MERCURY METHYLENE CHLORIDE MOLYBDENUM N-DECANE N-DOCOSANE N-DODECANE N-EICOSANE N-HEXACOSANE N-HEXADECANE N-OCTACOSANE N-OCTADECANE N-TETRACOSANE N-TETRADECANE N-TRIACONTANE NAPHTHALENE NICKEL O+P XYLENE OIL AND GREASE (AS HEM) P-CRESOL P-CYMENE PENTAMETHYLBENZENE PHENOL SELENIUM SILVER TETRACHLOROETHENE THALLIUM TIN TITANIUM TOLUENE TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON (TOC) TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE TRICHLOROETHENE VANADIUM YTTRIUM ZINC Totals 40,464 0 33,983 10,198 131,729 8,850 14,651 10,908 669,275 25,088 12,470 66,280 63,203 66,640 34 132,825 104,120,680 32,242 37,307 4,886 236,114,575 2,334 122,751 14,070 4,594 121,275 15,102 12,588 34,107 7,312 1,143,483 43,507 66,481 16,244 22,988 170 26,294 8,980 624,681 14,748 165,833 128,002 14,359 78,869 8,887 62,912 20,654 99,447 13,750 38,379 13,973 10,270 35,269,760 0 49,931 0 11,871 352 4,250 37,725 0 5,133 16,066 61,674 72,968,740 11,766,277 56,330,170 3,146 2,820 1,890 737 178,466 521,262,341 2,255 0 33,983 8,683 131,334 8,229 14,537 10,885 458,327 18,264 12,470 40,820 62,413 66,640 34 80,421 99,172,611 31,782 23,856 3,342 165,442,212 1,493 122,746 10,171 3,397 82,192 10,939 9,058 5,031 7,312 566,093 43,507 30,729 15,206 12,167 146 24,944 8,290 357,429 6,345 48,770 13,916 4,438 25,876 3,162 13,862 9,114 22,833 6,929 18,987 9,979 10,033 15,052,637 0 18,155 0 11,864 352 3,793 17,821 0 4,255 8,665 42,501 67,714,343 2,446,918 27,935,334 3,146 2,820 1,659 696 101,143 380,494,295 POTW Removals Removals Removal After POTW (Ibs/yr) Efficiency (%) (Ibs/yr) 38,210 0 0 1,515 396 621 114 23 210,948 6,824 0 25,460 790 0 0 52,404 4,948,069 460 13,451 1,544 70,672,363 841 5 3,898 1,198 39,082 4,163 3,530 29,076 0 577,390 0 35,752 1,038 10,821 24 1,349 690 267,251 8,403 117,063 114,086 9,921 52,992 5,726 49,051 11,540 76,614 6,821 19,392 3,994 237 20,217,122 0 31,776 0 7 0 457 19,904 0 878 7,400 19,173 5,254,397 9,319,359 28,394,836 0 0 231 41 77,323 140,768,046 24% 62% 18% 28% 85% 63% 18% 18% 88% 72% 40% 35% 81% 33% 61% 60% 91% 14% 86% 91% 82% 24% 24% 91% 4% 84% 75% 33% 33% 33% 83% 62% 92% 33% 41% 33% 18% 52% 33% 94% 33% 33% 94% 33% 94% 33% 94% 33% 94% 18% 52% 33% 87% 72% 99% 91% 95% 34% 80% 33% 28% 65% 69% 33% 71% 74% 91% 33% 33% 42% 58% 77% 29,039 0 0 1,091 59 230 93 19 25,314 1,911 0 16,549 150 0 0 20,962 445,326 396 1,883 139 12,721,025 639 4 351 1,150 6,253 1,041 2,365 19,481 0 98,156 0 2,860 696 6,384 16 1,106 331 179,058 504 78,432 76,438 595 35,505 344 32,864 692 51,331 409 15,902 1,917 159 2,628,226 0 318 0 0 0 91 13,335 0 307 2,294 12,846 1,523,775 2,423,033 2,555,535 0 0 134 17 17,784 23,056,868 Toxic Weighting PE Factor Removals 4.30E-003 1.20E+000 2.20E-005 1.80E-002 7.60E-006 4.30E-003 1.20E-004 l.OOE-003 6.40E-002 1.90E-001 4.00E+000 2.00E-003 3.30E-004 5.60E-003 5.30E+000 1.10E-001 O.OOE+000 1.80E-001 2.30E-002 5.20E+000 O.OOE+000 2.90E-003 2.10E-003 2.70E-002 1.10E-001 4.70E-001 1.20E-002 2.20E-001 1.40E-003 3.40E-004 5.60E-003 7.30E-004 1.80E+000 1.50E-003 1.40E-002 5.00E+002 4.20E-004 2.00E-001 4.30E-003 8.20E-005 4.30E-003 4.30E-003 8.20E-005 4.30E-003 8.20E-005 4.30E-003 8.20E-005 4.30E-003 8.20E-005 1.50E-002 3.60E-002 8.50E-003 O.OOE+000 2.40E-003 4.30E-002 2.90E-001 2.80E-002 1.10E+000 4.70E+001 7.40E-002 1.40E-001 3.00E-001 2.90E-002 5.60E-003 O.OOE+000 O.OOE+000 O.OOE+000 9.30E-005 6.30E-002 6.20E-001 O.OOE+000 5.10E-002 125 0 0 20 0 1 0 0 1,620 363 1 33 0 0 0 2,306 0 71 43 723 0 2 0 9 126 2,939 12 520 27 0 550 0 5,148 1 89 8,002 0 66 770 0 337 329 0 153 0 141 0 221 0 239 69 1 0 0 14 0 0 0 4,296 987 0 92 67 72 0 0 0 0 0 83 0 907 31,577 Source: Development Document. ------- Industry Loads and Removals By Pollutant DAF-IL Option, 5MM/255K Cutoff Pollutant Code Til T37 N34 N38 N42 T22 N54 N58 AL SB AS BA N64 N66 BE T66 BOD B T67 CD COD T7 T23 CR CO CU T68 T69 T38 N90 FE T54 PB N95 MN HO T44 MO N102 N103 N104 N105 N106 N107 N114 N115 N116 N117 N118 T55 NI N119 HEM N125 N126 N130 T65 SE AO T85 TL SN TI T86 TOC SHEM TS T30 T87 V Y ZN Industry Baseline Industry Treated Analyte Load (Ibs/yr) Load (Ibs/yr) 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 1,2-DIPHENYLHYDRAZINE 2-BUTANONE 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE 2-PROPANONE 4-CHLORO-3-METHYLPHENOL 4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE ALPHA-TERPINEOL ALUMINUM ANTIMONY ARSENIC BARIUM BENZOIC ACID BENZYL ALCOHOL BERYLLIUM BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE BOD 5-DAY (CARBONACEOUS) BORON BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE CADMIUM CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND (COD) CHLOROBENZENE CHLOROFORM CHROMIUM COBALT COPPER DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE ETHYLBENZENE HEXANOIC ACID IRON ISOPHORONE LEAD M-XYLENE MANGANESE MERCURY METHYLENE CHLORIDE MOLYBDENUM N-DECANE N-DOCOSANE N-DODECANE N-EICOSANE N-HEXACOSANE N-HEXADECANE N-OCTACOSANE N-OCTADECANE N-TETRACOSANE N-TETRADECANE N-TRIACONTANE NAPHTHALENE NICKEL O+P XYLENE OIL AND GREASE (AS HEM) P-CRESOL P-CYMENE PENTAMETHYLBENZENE PHENOL SELENIUM SILVER TETRACHLOROETHENE THALLIUM TIN TITANIUM TOLUENE TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON (TOC) TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE TRICHLOROETHENE VANADIUM YTTRIUM ZINC Totals 33,432 0 28,704 8,074 113,260 6,888 12,341 9,354 537,651 19,694 10,704 54,111 52,420 56,807 26 107,755 87,450,551 26,941 32,124 4,002 189,588,950 2,053 105,870 11,402 3,907 97,610 12,228 10,317 26,947 5,762 895,613 36,677 53,467 13,596 18,489 141 21,649 7,642 517,127 11,271 128,980 99,826 11,166 62,162 6,844 48,883 16,413 77,866 11,128 31,341 11,300 8,716 28,563,674 0 43,735 0 9,985 264 3,591 30,356 0 3,893 12,641 51,118 60,704,055 9,349,866 44,708,381 2,793 2,543 1,556 621 141,259 424,150,513 1,719 0 28,704 6,721 112,864 6,290 12,227 9,331 378,481 15,002 10,704 34,436 51,630 56,807 26 67,470 82,919,296 26,481 19,564 2,699 130,590,755 1,236 105,865 7,964 2,752 65,063 8,654 7,451 3,533 5,762 452,699 36,677 24,289 12,597 10,057 123 20,359 7,003 302,042 5,173 39,205 11,384 3,576 21,226 2,597 11,063 7,574 18,716 5,843 15,414 8,094 8,480 12,491,092 0 14,814 0 9,977 264 3,153 12,418 0 3,089 7,330 33,985 55,892,337 1,935,173 22,990,267 2,793 2,543 1,354 584 76,854 309,061,707 POTW Removals Removals Removal After POTW (Ibs/yr) Efficiency (%) (Ibs/yr) 31,712 0 0 1,354 395 598 114 23 159,170 4,692 0 19,675 790 0 0 40,286 4,531,255 460 12,560 1,303 58,998,195 817 5 3,438 1,155 32,547 3,574 2,866 23,414 0 442,913 0 29,178 999 8,432 18 1,290 639 215,085 6,098 89,775 88,442 7,590 40,936 4,247 37,820 8,839 59,149 5,284 15,927 3,206 237 16,072,582 0 28,922 0 7 0 438 17,937 0 805 5,312 17,132 4,811,719 7,414,694 21,718,114 0 0 202 37 64,405 115,088,807 24% 62% 18% 28% 85% 63% 18% 18% 88% 72% 40% 35% 81% 33% 61% 60% 91% 14% 86% 91% 82% 24% 24% 91% 4% 84% 75% 33% 33% 33% 83% 62% 92% 33% 41% 33% 18% 52% 33% 94% 33% 33% 94% 33% 94% 33% 94% 33% 94% 18% 52% 33% 87% 72% 99% 91% 95% 34% 80% 33% 28% 65% 69% 33% 71% 74% 91% 33% 33% 42% 58% 77% 24,101 0 0 975 59 221 93 19 19,100 1,314 0 12,789 150 0 0 16,114 407,813 396 1,758 117 10,619,675 621 4 309 1,109 5,207 893 1,920 15,688 0 75,295 0 2,334 669 4,975 12 1,058 307 144,107 366 60,149 59,256 455 27,427 255 25,339 530 39,630 317 13,061 1,539 158 2,089,436 0 289 0 0 0 88 12,018 0 282 1,647 11,479 1,395,398 1,927,820 1,954,630 0 0 117 16 14,813 18,995,720 Toxic Weighting PE Factor Removals 4.30E-003 1.20E+000 2.20E-005 1.80E-002 7.60E-006 4.30E-003 1.20E-004 l.OOE-003 6.40E-002 1.90E-001 4.00E+000 2.00E-003 3.30E-004 5.60E-003 5.30E+000 1.10E-001 O.OOE+000 1.80E-001 2.30E-002 5.20E+000 O.OOE+000 2.90E-003 2.10E-003 2.70E-002 1.10E-001 4.70E-001 1.20E-002 2.20E-001 1.40E-003 3.40E-004 5.60E-003 7.30E-004 1.80E+000 1.50E-003 1.40E-002 5.00E+002 4.20E-004 2.00E-001 4.30E-003 8.20E-005 4.30E-003 4.30E-003 8.20E-005 4.30E-003 8.20E-005 4.30E-003 8.20E-005 4.30E-003 8.20E-005 1.50E-002 3.60E-002 8.50E-003 O.OOE+000 2.40E-003 4.30E-002 2.90E-001 2.80E-002 1.10E+000 4.70E+001 7.40E-002 1.40E-001 3.00E-001 2.90E-002 5.60E-003 O.OOE+000 O.OOE+000 O.OOE+000 9.30E-005 6.30E-002 6.20E-001 O.OOE+000 5.10E-002 104 0 0 18 0 1 0 0 1,222 250 1 26 0 0 0 1,773 0 71 40 610 0 2 0 8 122 2,448 11 422 22 0 422 0 4,202 1 70 6,046 0 61 620 0 259 255 0 118 0 109 0 170 0 196 55 1 0 0 12 0 0 0 4,114 889 0 84 48 64 0 0 0 0 0 73 0 755 25,774 Source: Development Document. ------- Appendix B Supporting Documentation for Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Cost Analysis ------- Table B-l Computation of Annualized Costs for CP-IL in 1993 and 1981 Dollars Costs CP IL CP IL CP IL CP IL no cutoff 1MM/255K 3MM/120K 5MM/255K Capital Cost ($1993) Annual O&M Cost ($1993) Total Annualized Capital Cost ($1993) Total Annual Cost ($1993) Deflator Total Cost ($1981) $528,827,868 $123,057,702 $55,980,474 $179,038,176 0.6785 $121,477,403 $507,469,980 $116,835,047 $53,719,578 $170,554,625 0.6785 $115,721,313 $387,491,478 $89,155,808 $41,018,936 $130,174,744 0.6785 $88,323,564 $234,139,808 $52,866,169 $24,785,489 $77,651,658 0.6785 $52,686,650 Source: Capital and O&M Costs: Development Document; Deflator: Engineering News Record Construction Cost Index, March 31, 1997. B-l ------- Table B-2 Computation of Annualized Costs for DAF-IL in 1993 and 1981 Dollars Costs DAF IL DAF IL DAF IL DAF IL no cutoff 1MM/255K 3MM/120K 5MM/255K Capital Cost ($1993) Annual O&M Cost ($1993) Total Annualized Capital Cost ($1993) Total Annual Cost ($1993) Deflator Total Cost ($1981) $435,352,966 $148,560,743 $46,085,441 $194,646,184 0.6785 $132,067,436 $417,313,882 $142,276,538 $44,175,866 $186,452,404 0.6785 $126,507,956 $313,173,435 $111,909,982 $33,151,803 $145,061,785 0.6785 $98,424,421 $180,570,477 $69,533,822 $19,114,766 $88,648,588 0.6785 $60,148,067 Source: Capital and O&M Costs: Development Document; Deflator: Engineering News Record Construction Cost Index, March 31, 1997. B-2 ------- |