&EPA
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Office of Water
(4303)
EPA821-R-00-005
March 2000
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis for the
Final Action Regarding Pretreatment
Standards for the Industrial Laundries
Point Source Category
(Revised March 2000)
-------
COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS FOR THE
FINAL ACTION REGARDING
PRETREATMENT STANDARDS FOR THE
INDUSTRIAL LAUNDRIES POINT SOURCE CATEGORY
(REVISED MARCH 2000)
FINAL REPORT
Carol M. Browner
Administrator
J. Charles Fox
Assistant Administrator, Office of Water
Sheila Frace
Director, Engineering and Analysis Division
Marvin B. Rubin
Chief, Energy Branch
George Denning
Work Assignment Manager
Engineering and Analysis Division
Office of Science and Technology
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Washington, D.C. 20460
-------
FOREWORD
This document delineates the cost-effectiveness analysis of the final action regarding
pretreatment standards for the Industrial Laundries Point Source Category. Based on revised analytical
data for semivolatile organic compounds for two sampling episodes conducted in 1996 and 1998, EPA
revised this document in March 2000. The following sections and appendices have been revised:
Section 2
—footnote #2;
—Table 2-2.
Section 3
—Table 3-1.
• Section 4
—Table 4-1.
• Appendix A
Appendix B
—Table B-l and B-2; reference date of 1999 deleted.
-------
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This report has been reviewed and approved for publication by the Engineering and
Analysis Division, Office of Science and Technology. This report was prepared with the support
of Eastern Research Group, Inc. (Contract No. 68-C6-0022), under the direction and review of
the Office of Science and Technology.
-------
CONTENTS
Page
SECTION ONE INTRODUCTION 1-1
SECTION TWO BACKGROUND AND METHODOLOGY 2-1
2.1 Pollutants of Concern 2-3
2.2 Toxic Weighting Factors 2-3
2.3 Pollution Control Options 2-4
2.4 Pollutant Removals 2-5
2.5 Annualized Costs of Compliance 2-6
2.6 Calculation of the Cost-Effectiveness Values 2-8
SECTION THREE COST-EFFECTIVENESS RESULTS 3-1
SECTION FOUR COMPARISON OF COST-EFFECTIVENESS VALUES WITH
PROMULGATED RULES 4-1
APPENDIX A SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION FOR COST-EFFECTIVENESS
ANALYSIS: POLLUTANT LOADING ANALYSIS A-l
APPENDIX B SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION FOR COST-EFFECTIVENESS
ANALYSIS: COST ANALYSIS B-l
-------
SECTION ONE
INTRODUCTION
This report supports the analysis of options and cutoffs considered as pretreatment standards for
the industrial laundries industry. In this document, the total annualized cost of each of two regulatory
options are compared to the corresponding effectiveness of that option, at the cutoffs, considered in
reducing the discharge of pollutants. EPA evaluates the effectiveness in terms of costs per pound of
pollutant removed, weighted by the relative toxicity of the pollutant (toxic weighting factor). The rationale
for this measure, referred to as "pounds-equivalent removed," is described later in this document.
Section Two discusses EPA's cost-effectiveness methodology and identifies the pollutants included
in the analysis. This section also presents EPA's toxic weighting factors for each pollutant and considers
the removal efficiency of each option. Section Three presents the results of the cost-effectiveness analysis.
In Section Four, the cost-effectiveness value for the regulatory option and cutoff considered for the
pretreatment standards is compared to cost-effectiveness values for other proposed and promulgated rules.
Appendix A and B present the pollutant reduction and costs for all cutoffs considered under the two
options that EPA considered during its decisionmaking process.
1-1
-------
SECTION TWO
BACKGROUND AND METHODOLOGY
Cost-effectiveness (CE) is evaluated as the incremental and average annualized cost of a pollution
control option in an industry or industry subcategory per incremental and total pound equivalent of
pollutant (i.e., pound of pollutant adjusted for toxicity) removed by that control option. The cost-
effectiveness analysis primarily enables EPA to compare the removal efficiencies of regulatory options
under consideration for a rule. A secondary use is to compare the cost effectiveness of the proposed option
for the pretreatment standards to that of pretreatment standards for other industries.
EPA generally ranks options in order of increasing pound equivalents removed to identify the point
at which increased removal of pollutants is no longer cost-effective. EPA typically determines this to be
where costs (per pound equivalent removed) increase sharply, that is, where relatively few incremental
pounds are removed for steady increases in cost. The accompanying figure (Figure 2-1) shows this point
as Point A, where the cost-effectiveness curve becomes nearly vertical. Increases in removals beyond this
point come only at relatively high unit costs, which, in many cases, EPA will determine exceed the benefit
of the increased removals to society. In this analysis, for reasons discussed below, EPA presents average
cost-effectiveness values only.
A number of steps must be undertaken before a cost-effectiveness analysis can be performed.
There are five steps that define the analysis or generate data for use in the cost-effectiveness calculation:
• Determine the wastewater pollutants of concern (priority and other pollutants).
• Estimate the relative toxic weights (the adjustments to pounds of pollutants to reflect
toxicity) of the pollutants of concern.
• Define the regulatory pollution control options.
• Calculate pollutant removals for each pollution control option.
• Determine the annualized cost of each pollution control option.
2-1
-------
ji
o
Range of
noncost-i
effective
removals
Range of
cost-effective
removals
100
Percentage of pound equivalents removed
Figure 2-1. Cost effectiveness
2-2
-------
All of these factors are used in the calculation of the cost-effectiveness values, which can then be
compared for each regulatory option under consideration. The following sections discuss the five
preliminary steps and the cost-effectiveness calculation and comparison methodologies.
2.1 POLLUTANTS OF CONCERN
Under the pretreatment standards, a number of priority and other nonconventional pollutants are
regulated. Some of the factors considered in selecting pollutants for regulation include toxicity, frequency
of occurrence in wastestream effluent, and amount of pollutant in the wastestream. The list of regulated
pollutants for each option is presented in Appendix A.
2.2 TOXIC WEIGHTING FACTORS
Cost-effectiveness analyses account for differences in toxicity among the pollutants using toxic
weighting factors. These factors are necessary because different pollutants have different potential effects
on human and aquatic life. For example, a pound of zinc in an effluent stream has a significantly different
effect than a pound of PCBs. Toxic weighting factors for pollutants are derived using ambient water
quality criteria and toxicity values. For most industries, toxic weighting factors are derived from chronic
freshwater aquatic criteria. In cases where a human health criterion has also been established for the
consumption offish, the sum of both the human and aquatic criteria are used to derive toxic weighting
factors. The factors are standardized by relating them to a "benchmark" toxicity value that was based on
the toxicity of copper when the methodology was developed.1 Appendix A presents the toxic weighting
factors used for the regulated pollutants in the cost-effectiveness analysis of the industrial laundries
industry.
1 Although the water quality criterion has been revised (to 12.0 (jg/1), all cost-effectiveness analyses for
effluent guideline regulations continue to use the "old" criterion of 5.6 (jg/1 as a benchmark so that cost-
effectiveness values can continue to be compared to those for other effluent guidelines. Where copper is
present in the effluent, the revised higher criterion for copper results in a toxic weighting factor for copper of
0.467 rather than 1.0.
2-3
-------
Examples of the effects of different aquatic and human health criteria on freshwater toxic
weighting factors are presented in Table 2-1. As shown in this table, the toxic weighting factor is the sum
of two criteria-weighted ratios: the "benchmark/old" copper criterion divided by the human health criterion
for the particular pollutant and the "benchmark/old" copper criterion divided by the aquatic chronic
criterion. For example, using the values reported in Table 2-1, 11 pounds of the benchmark chemical
(copper) pose the same relative hazard in freshwater as one pound of cadmium because cadmium has a
freshwater toxic weight 11 times as large as the toxic weight of copper (5.16/0.467=11.05).
Table 2-1
Examples of Toxic Weighting Factors
Based on Copper Freshwater Chronic Criteria
Pollutant
Copper3
Cadmium
Naphthalene
Human Health
Criteria
(us/1)
84
41,026
Aquatic
Chronic
Criteria (jig/1)
12.0
1.1
370
Weighting Calculation
5.6/12.0
5.6/84 + 5.6/1.1
5.6/41,026 + 5.6/370
Toxic
Weighting
Factor
0.467
5.16
0.015
aAlthough the water quality criterion for copper has been revised (to 12.0 (jg/1), the cost effectiveness
analysis used the previous criterion (5.6 (jg/1) to facilitate comparisons with cost-effectiveness values for
other effluent limitations guidelines. The revised higher criteria for copper results in a toxic weighting
factor for copper equal to 0.467 instead of 1.0, which was the result of the previous criterion.
Notes: Human health and aquatic chronic criteria are maximum contamination thresholds. Units for
criteria are micrograms of pollutant per liter of water.
Sources: EPA, 1997. Toxic and Pollutant Weighting Factors for Pretreatment Standards for the
Industrial Laundries Point Source Category. June.
2-4
-------
2.3 POLLUTION CONTROL OPTIONS
Pretreatment Standards for Existing Sources (PSES) and Pretreatment Standards for New
Sources (PSNS) options would have been issued had EPA promulgated a rule. Because there are no direct
discharges in the industrial laundry industry, Best Available Technology (BAT), New Source Performance
Standards (NSPS), and Best Practicable Control Technology (BPT) are not considered. This cost-
effectiveness analysis was performed for two pollution control options, at each cutoff, for indirect
dischargers: CP-IL, chemical precipitation treatment of wastewater from industrial laundry items; and
DAF-IL, dissolved air flotation treatment of wastewater from industrial laundry items. A zero-discharge
option is not considered within the analysis.
The cutoffs are defined as:
• A cutoff excluding all facilities laundering less than 1 million pounds of incoming laundry
(total) and less than 255,000 pounds of shop and/or printer towels per calender year (this
cutoff is identical to that proposed). This cutoff is called the 1 MM/255K cutoff for the
purposes of this EA.
• A cutoff excluding all facilities that launder between 1 and 3 million pounds of incoming
laundry (total) and less than 120,000 pounds of shop and/or printer towels per calender
year, in addition to those facilities laundering less than 1 million pounds of incoming
laundry (total) and less than 255,000 pounds of shop and/or printer towels per calender
year. This cutoff is called the 3MM/120K cutoff for the purposes of this EA.
• A cutoff excluding all facilities laundering less than 5 million pounds of incoming laundry
(total) and less than 255,000 pounds of shop and/or printer towels per calender year. This
cutoff is called the 5MM/255K cutoff for the purposes of this EA.
EPA's selected option and cutoff is CP-IL under the 3MM/120K cutoff.
2.4 POLLUTANT REMOVALS
The pollutant loadings have been calculated for each facility under each regulatory cutoff and
option for comparison with baseline loadings. The postregulatory removals under each regulatory cutoff
and option are presented in Appendix A.
2-5
-------
Pollutant removals are calculated directly as the difference between current and post-treatment
discharges. Removals are then weighted using the toxic weighting factors and are reported in pound
equivalents (see Appendix A for pound-equivalent removals for all pollutants by pollutant and cutoff).
Total removals for each cutoff are then calculated by summing the removals for all pollutants under each
cutoff.
One additional step is undertaken to calculate final reductions in pollutant loadings for indirect
dischargers because of the ability of POTWs to remove pollutants, measured as POTW removal
efficiencies. Appendix A presents the POTW removal efficiencies for 72 pollutants.
POTW removal efficiencies are used as follows. If a facility is discharging 100 pounds of
cadmium in its effluent stream to a POTW and the POTW has a removal efficiency for cadmium of
38 percent, then the cadmium discharged to surface waters is only 62 pounds. If the regulation results in a
reduction of cadmium in the effluent stream such that total cadmium discharged to the POTW is
50 pounds, then the amount discharged to surface waters is calculated as 50 pounds multiplied by the
POTW removal efficiency factor (1 - 0.38 or 0.62 times 50 pounds equals 31 pounds). The cost-
effectiveness calculations then reflect the fact that the actual reduction of pollutant discharged to surface
water is not 50 pounds (the change in the amount discharged to the POTW), but 31 pounds (the change in
the amount actually discharged to surface water). Pollutant removals calculated in this way are presented
in Table 2-2.
2.5 ANNUALIZED COSTS OF COMPLIANCE
Under each regulatory cutoff, annualized costs of compliance have been developed.2 The
derivation of these costs is summarized briefly below.
2 U.S. EPA, 2000. Technical Development Document for the Final Action Regarding Pretreatment
Standards for the Industrial Laundries Point Source Category (Revised March 2000) .821 -R-00-006. March,
and U.S. EPA, 2000. Economic Assessment for the Final Action Regarding Pretreatment Standards for the
Industrial Laundries Point Source Category (RevisedMarch 2000). 821-R-00-004. March.
2-6
-------
Table 2-2
Total Pollutant Removals by Option and Cutoff
Option
Pounds
Removed
Pounds-Equivalent
Removed
CP-IL
no cutoff
1MM/255K cutoff
3MM/120K cutoff
5MM/255K cutoff
143,410,775
139,765,321
129,736,310
108,573,146
42,917
42,155
38,483
31,403
DAF-IL
no cutoff
1MM/255K cutoff
3MM/120K cutoff
5MM/255K cutoff
157,363,650
153,652,407
140,768,046
115,088,807
35,245
34,542
31,577
25,774
Source: Tables A-l through A-8.
2-7
-------
EPA derived the pretax costs (including the state and federal governments' share of compliance
costs)3 of purchasing, installing, and operating pollution control equipment. EPA annualized any capital
costs at 7 percent4 over 16 years and added these costs to the annual costs of operating the pollution control
equipment. The aggregate annual pretax costs by option are presented in Table 2-3. Appendix B presents
the calculations used to arrive at the aggregate annual costs figures presented in Table 2-3.
2.6 CALCULATION OF THE COST-EFFECTIVENESS VALUES
Cost-effectiveness values are calculated separately for each regulatory option. Generally,
options first are ranked in ascending order of pounds equivalent of pollutants removed. The incremental
cost-effectiveness value for a particular control option is calculated as the ratio of the incremental annual
cost to the incremental pounds equivalent removed. Average cost-effectiveness values for each option are
calculated as total dollars for the option divided by total pounds equivalent removed by the option. The
incremental cost-effectiveness values are viewed in comparison to the baseline (zero costs/zero removals)
for the first option and to the preceding regulatory option. Cost-effectiveness values are reported in units of
dollars per pounds equivalent of pollutant removed. In this report, EPA presents average cost-effectiveness
values, as discussed below.
For the purpose of comparing cost-effectiveness values of options under review to those of
other promulgated rules, compliance costs used in the cost-effectiveness analysis (which are in 1993
dollars) are adjusted to 1981 dollars using Engineering News Records Construction Cost Index (CCI) (see
Table 3 for compliance costs in 1981 dollars). This adjustment factor is calculated as follows:
Adjustment factor = (1981 CCI)/(1993 CCI) = 3,535/5,210 = 0.6785
The equation used to calculate incremental cost effectiveness is:
3 Every dollar spent on compliance can be applied against a firm's taxable income. Due to various tax
mechanisms such as accelerated depreciation, this reduction means that firms face only about 70 percent of
compliance costs after taxes.
4 Source of real cost of capital: Office of Management and Budget (OMB), 1996. "Memorandum to the
regulatory working group on economic analysis of federal regulations under Executive Order 12866." Sally
Katzen.
2-8
-------
Table 2-3
Aggregate Annual Cost by Option and Cutoff
Option
Pretax Annualized
Cost
($1993)
Pretax Annualized
Cost
($1981)
CP-IL
no cutoff
1MM/255K cutoff
3MM/120K cutoff
5MM/255K cutoff
$179,038,176
$170,554,625
$130,174,744
$77,651,658
$121,477,403
$115,721,313
$88,323,564
$52,686,650
DAF-IL
no cutoff
1MM/255K cutoff
3MM/120K cutoff
5MM/255K cutoff
$194,646,184
$186,452,404
$145,061,785
$88,648,588
$132,067,436
$126,507,956
$98,424,421
$60,148,067
Source: see Tables B-l and B-2.
2-9
-------
CEk =
ATC, - ATC,
where:
CEk= Cost-effectiveness of Option k
ATCk= Total annualized treatment cost under Option k
PEk= Pound equivalents removed by Option k
The numerator of the equation, ATCk minus ATCk.1; is simply the incremental annualized
treatment cost in going from Option k-1 (an option that removes fewer pound equivalent pollutants) to
Option k (an option that removes more pound equivalent pollutants). The denominator is similarly the
incremental removals achieved in going from Option k-1 to k. Thus, cost effectiveness measures the
incremental unit cost of pollutant removal of Option k (in pound equivalents) in comparison to
Option k-1.
Because the options are ranked in ascending order of pound equivalents of pollutants removed,
any option that has higher costs but lower removals than another option immediately can be identified (the
cost-effectiveness value for the next option becomes negative). When negative values are computed for
Option k, Option k-1 will be noted as "dominated" (having a higher cost and lower removals than Option
k). Option k-1 is then removed from the cost-effectiveness calculations, and all cost-effectiveness values
within a regulatory grouping are then recalculated without the "dominated" option. This process continues
until all "dominated" options are eliminated. The remaining options can then be presented in terms of their
incremental cost-effectiveness values and are considered viable options for regulatory consideration.
Average cost-effectiveness values can also be derived by setting ATCk_! to zero and by setting
the pollutant loadings (PEk_]) to the current loading. These values can be used, with caution, to compare an
option to previously promulgated effluent limitations guidelines. Because the DAF-IL option removes fewer
pollutants at a higher cost than the CP-IL option, DAF-IL is dominated. Because DAF-IL is dominated
incremental cost-effectiveness is not meaningful. Thus EPA presents, in Section Three, the average cost-
effectiveness results for CP-IL and DAF-IL at each cutoff.
2-10
-------
SECTION THREE
COST-EFFECTIVENESS RESULTS
In this cost-effectiveness analysis, EPA evaluates two PSES options, assuming only that
wastewater from industrial laundry items will be treated (linen supply wastewater would not have required
treatment). If untreated, the treated and untreated streams are combined prior to discharge. Table 3-1
presents the cost-effectiveness data and results. As Table 3-1 shows, the average cost-effectiveness value
for the CP-IL 3MM/120K option is $2,295/lb-eq. Note that because DAF-IL is dominated, the average
cost-effectiveness value of CP-IL under the 3MM/120K cutoff is also the incremental cost-effectiveness
value for that option and cutoff.
Table 3-1
Cost-Effectiveness Results by Option and Cutoff
Option
Total Annual
Pound
Equivalents
Removed
(Ibs.)
Cost
($1981)
Average
Cost
Effectiveness
($1981)
($/lb. equiv.)
CP-IL
No cutoff
1MM/255K
3MM/120K
5MM/255K
42,917
42,155
38,483
31,403
$121,477,403
$115,721,313
$88,323,564
$52,686,650
$2,831
$2,745
$2,295
$1,678
DAF-IL
No cutoff
1MM/255K
3MM/120K
5MM/7.55K
35,245
34,542
31,577
7.5 774
$132,067,436
$126,507,956
$98,424,421
$60 148067
$3,747
$3,662
$3,117
$7. 334
3-1
-------
SECTION FOUR
COMPARISON OF COST-EFFECTIVENESS VALUES WITH
PROMULGATED RULES
As discussed in Section Two, incremental cost-effectiveness is the appropriate measure for
comparing one regulatory option to an alternative, less stringent regulatory option for the same rule. Some
believe that it may also be used to compare cost-effectiveness across rules when considering how the last
increment of stringency in one rule compares to the last increment of stringency in another. For comparing
the overall cost-effectiveness of one rule to another, average cost-effectiveness may be a more appropriate
measure, but must be considered in context with caution. (Average cost-effectiveness can be thought of as
the "increment" between no regulation and the selected option, for any given rule.) In this case, because
only two options are considered and one is dominated, the average and incremental values of the selected
option under the 3MM/120K cutoff are the same.
Table 4-1 presents the incremental cost-effectiveness value for the regulatory option considered
(CP-IL under the 3MM/120K cutoff) and pretreatment standards issued for other industries. The numbers
presented here for this rulemaking are pretax costs, whereas many of the numbers presented for other
effluent guidelines are after-tax costs—that is, the costs actually faced by the firms, not the total cost of the
equipment (which is subsidized by reductions in taxable income). Because of these factors and the fact that
EPA could only conduct and average cost effectiveness for this industry, direct comparisons between this
rulemaking and others cannot be made easily. The equivalent after-tax cost, however, is approximately 70
percent of pretax costs. As Table 3-1 shows, the cost-effectiveness of the primary regulatory option is
$2,295 per pound equivalent removed. Compared to other effluent guidelines, EPA does not consider this
rule to be cost-effective.
4-1
-------
TABLE 4-1
INDUSTRY COMPARISON OF PSES INCREMENTAL COST-EFFECTIVENESS
FOR INDIRECT DISCHARGERS
(Toxic and Nonconventional Pollutants Only; Copper-Based Weights3; $ 1981)
Industry
Aluminum Forming
Battery Manufacturing
Canmaking
Coal Mining13
Coastal Oil and Gasb
Coil Coating
Copper Forming
Electronics I
Electronics II
Foundries
Industrial Laundries
Inorganic Chemicals I
Inorganic Chemicals II
Iron and Steel
Leather Tanning
Metal Finishing
Nonferrous Metals Forming
Nonferrous Metals Manufacturin
Nonferrous Metals Manufacturin
Offshore Oil and Gasb
OCSPSFC
Pharmaceuticals A/C
B/D
Plastics Molding and Forming
PE Currently Discharged
(thousands)
1,602
1,152
252
NA
NA
2,503
34
75
260
2,136
181
3,971
4,760
5,599
16,830
11,680
189
>I 3,187
>II 38
NA
5,210
897
90
NA
PE Remaining at Selected
Option
(thousands)
18
5
5
NA
NA
10
4
35
24
18
142
3,004
6
1,404
1,899
755
5
19
0.41
NA
72
614
9
NA
Cost-Effectiveness of
Selected Option(s)
(S/PE removed)
155
15
38
NA
NA
10
10
14
14
116
2,295
9
<1
6
111
10
90
15
12
NA
34
96
66
NA
4-2
-------
TABLE 4-1 (continued)
Industry
Porcelain Enameling
Pulp and Paper4
Transportation Equipment
Cleaning4
PE Currently Discharged
(thousands)
1,565
9,539
426
PE Remaining at
Selected Option
(thousands)
96
103
383
Cost-Effectiveness of
Selected Option(s)
(S/PE removed)
14
65
185
aAlthough toxic weighing factors for priority pollutants varied across these rules, this table reflects the cost-effectiveness at the time
of regulation.
Industry has no known or expected indirect discharges.
'Reflects costs and removals of both air and water pollutants.
dProposed.
4-3
-------
Appendix A
Supporting Documentation for
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis:
Pollutant Loadings Analysis
-------
Table A-l
Industry Loads and Removals By Pollutant
CP-IL Option, No Cutoff
Pollutant
Code
Til
T37
N34
N38
N42
T22
N54
N58
AL
SB
AS
BA
N64
N66
BE
T66
BOD
B
T67
CD
COD
T7
T23
CR
CO
CU
T68
T69
T38
N90
FE
T54
PB
N95
MN
HG
T44
MO
N102
N103
N104
N105
N106
N107
N114
N115
N116
N117
N118
T55
NI
N119
HEM
N125
N126
N130
T65
SE
AG
T85
TL
SN
TI
T86
TOG
SHEM
TS
T30
T87
V
Y
ZN
Industry Baseline Industry Treated
Analyte Load (Ibs/yr) Load (Ibs/yr)
1,1,1 -TRICHLOROETHANE
1 ,2-DIPHENYLHYDRAZINE
2-BUTANONE
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
2-PROPANONE
4-CHLORO-3-METHYLPHENOL
4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE
ALPHA-TERPrNEOL
ALUMINUM
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BENZOIC ACID
BENZYL ALCOHOL
BERYLLIUM
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
BOD 5-DAY (CARBONACEOUS)
BORON
BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
CADMIUM
CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND (COD)
CHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROFORM
CHROMIUM
COBALT
COPPER
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE
ETHYLBENZENE
HEXANOIC ACID
IRON
ISOPHORONE
LEAD
M-XYLENE
MANGANESE
MERCURY
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
MOLYBDENUM
N-DECANE
N-DOCOSANE
N-DODECANE
N-EICOSANE
N-HEXACOSANE
N-HEXADECANE
N-OCTACOSANE
N-OCTADECANE
N-TETRACOSANE
N-TETRADECANE
N-TRIACONTANE
NAPHTHALENE
NICKEL
0+P XYLENE
OIL AND GREASE (AS HEM)
P-CRESOL
P-CYMENE
PENTAMETHYLBENZENE
PHENOL
SELENIUM
SILVER
TETRACHLOROETHENE
THALLIUM
TIN
TITANIUM
TOLUENE
TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON (TOC)
TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON
TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS
TRANS-1 ,2-DICHLOROETHENE
TRICHLOROETHENE
VANADIUM
YTTRIUM
ZINC
Totals
44,354
0
37,079
11,420
139,704
10,048
15,946
11,666
731,628
27,706
13,064
72,023
68,837
71,863
39
143,930
111,166,461
34,933
39,666
5,345
259,751,769
2,487
128,187
15,303
4,940
132,972
16,435
13,633
38,046
8,077
1,275,369
47,778
73,428
17,712
25,269
182
29,221
9,542
673,669
16,653
186,284
146,471
16,085
88,172
10,047
71,627
22,929
112,400
15,088
41,634
15,287
11,110
38,519,591
0
52,508
0
12,686
403
4,535
42,301
0
5,854
17,716
66,379
78,340,477
13,109,842
62,531,426
3,358
2,971
2,040
783
199,400
568,575,789
24,961
0
35,068
3,026
85,958
3,544
15,946
7,759
491,296
17,615
13,050
50,147
68,837
52,597
37
79,273
102,558,482
33,031
13,169
3,077
197,873,919
1,708
127,943
9,375
2,809
72,944
4,787
10,108
12,064
8,072
531,645
24,228
27,292
14,657
12,823
161
11,728
9,488
347,700
5,872
128,584
12,320
4,279
24,316
3,877
11,910
8,936
21,622
7,456
19,075
10,686
9,824
15,314,139
0
14,907
0
12,685
247
3,428
27,571
0
2,595
11,656
51,536
72,196,038
2,377,260
32,147,990
3,358
1,757
1,822
771
68,172
425,165,014
POTW Removals
Removals Removal After POTW
(Ibs/yr) Efficiency (%) (Ibs/yr)
19,393
0
2,011
8,394
53,746
6,504
0
3,907
240,332
10,091
14
21,876
0
19,265
2
64,656
8,607,980
1,902
26,497
2,268
61,877,850
779
244
5,928
2,131
60,028
11,648
3,524
25,982
5
743,724
23,550
46,137
3,056
12,446
22
17,493
54
325,970
10,780
57,700
134,150
11,806
63,856
6,170
59,717
13,993
90,778
7,632
22,560
4,601
1,286
23,205,452
0
37,601
0
0
156
1,107
14,730
0
3,259
6,061
14,842
6,144,439
10,732,581
30,383,436
0
1,214
218
11
131,228
143,410,775
24%
62%
18%
28%
85%
63%
18%
18%
88%
72%
40%
35%
81%
33%
61%
60%
91%
14%
86%
91%
82%
24%
24%
91%
4%
84%
75%
33%
33%
33%
83%
62%
92%
33%
41%
33%
18%
52%
33%
94%
33%
33%
94%
33%
94%
33%
94%
33%
94%
18%
52%
33%
87%
72%
99%
91%
95%
34%
80%
33%
28%
65%
69%
33%
71%
74%
91%
33%
33%
42%
58%
77%
14,739
0
1,649
6,044
8,062
2,407
0
3,204
28,840
2,826
8
14,219
0
12,908
1
25,863
774,718
1,636
3,710
204
11,138,013
592
186
534
2,046
9,604
2,912
2,361
17,408
4
126,433
8,949
3,691
2,047
7,343
15
14,344
26
218,400
647
38,659
89,881
708
42,784
370
40,010
840
60,821
458
18,499
2,208
861
3,016,709
0
376
0
0
103
221
9,869
0
1,140
1,879
9,944
1,781,887
2,790,471
2,734,509
0
813
126
5
30,182
23,130,926
Toxic
Weighting PE
Factor Removals
4.30E-003
1.20E+000
2.20E-005
1.80E-002
7.60E-006
4.30E-003
1.20E-004
l.OOE-003
6.40E-002
1.90E-001
4.00E+000
2.00E-003
3.30E-004
5.60E-003
5.30E+000
1.10E-001
O.OOE+000
1.80E-001
2.30E-002
5.20E+000
O.OOE+000
2.90E-003
2.10E-003
2.70E-002
1.10E-001
4.70E-001
1.20E-002
2.20E-001
1.40E-003
3.40E-004
5.60E-003
7.30E-004
1.80E+000
1.50E-003
1.40E-002
5.00E+002
4.20E-004
2.00E-001
4.30E-003
8.20E-005
4.30E-003
4.30E-003
8.20E-005
4.30E-003
8.20E-005
4.30E-003
8.20E-005
4.30E-003
8.20E-005
1.50E-002
3.60E-002
8.50E-003
O.OOE+000
2.40E-003
4.30E-002
2.90E-001
2.80E-002
1.10E+000
4.70E+001
7.40E-002
1.40E-001
3.00E-001
2.90E-002
5.60E-003
O.OOE+000
O.OOE+000
O.OOE+000
9.30E-005
6.30E-002
6.20E-001
O.OOE+000
5.10E-002
63
0
0
109
0
10
0
3
1,846
537
34
28
0
72
4
2,845
0
294
85
1,061
0
2
0
14
225
4,514
35
519
24
0
708
7
6,644
3
103
7,254
6
5
939
0
166
386
0
184
0
172
0
262
0
277
80
7
0
0
16
0
0
113
10,406
730
0
342
54
56
0
0
0
0
51
78
0
1,539
42,917
Source: Development Document.
A-l
-------
Table A-2
Industry Loads and Removals By Pollutant
CP-IL Option, 1MM/25SK Cutoff
Pollutant
Code
Til
T37
N34
N38
N42
T22
N54
N58
AL
SB
AS
BA
N64
N66
BE
T66
BOD
B
T67
CD
COD
T7
T23
CR
CO
CU
T68
T69
T38
N90
FE
T54
PB
N95
MN
HG
T44
MO
N102
N103
N104
N105
N106
N107
N114
N115
N116
N117
N118
T55
NI
N119
HEM
N125
N126
N130
T65
SE
AG
T85
TL
SN
TI
T86
TOG
SHEM
TS
T30
T87
V
Y
ZN
Industry Baseline Industry Treated
Analyte Load (Ibs/yr) Load (Ibs/yr)
1,1,1 -TRICHLOROETHANE
1 ,2-DIPHENYLHYDRAZINE
2-BUTANONE
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
2-PROPANONE
4-CHLORO-3-METHYLPHENOL
4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE
ALPHA-TERPrNEOL
ALUMINUM
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BENZOIC ACID
BENZYL ALCOHOL
BERYLLIUM
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
BOD 5-DAY (CARBONACEOUS)
BORON
BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
CADMIUM
CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND (COD)
CHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROFORM
CHROMIUM
COBALT
COPPER
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE
ETHYLBENZENE
HEXANOIC ACID
IRON
ISOPHORONE
LEAD
M-XYLENE
MANGANESE
MERCURY
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
MOLYBDENUM
N-DECANE
N-DOCOSANE
N-DODECANE
N-EICOSANE
N-HEXACOSANE
N-HEXADECANE
N-OCTACOSANE
N-OCTADECANE
N-TETRACOSANE
N-TETRADECANE
N-TRIACONTANE
NAPHTHALENE
NICKEL
0+P XYLENE
OIL AND GREASE (AS HEM)
P-CRESOL
P-CYMENE
PENTAMETHYLBENZENE
PHENOL
SELENIUM
SILVER
TETRACHLOROETHENE
THALLIUM
TIN
TITANIUM
TOLUENE
TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON (TOC)
TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON
TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS
TRANS-1 ,2-DICHLOROETHENE
TRICHLOROETHENE
VANADIUM
YTTRIUM
ZINC
Totals
43,682
0
36,490
11,262
137,556
9,930
15,687
11,504
726,162
27,540
12,972
71,175
68,136
70,980
39
142,454
110,170,372
34,572
39,223
5,281
256,658,823
2,448
127,263
15,133
4,879
131,381
16,193
13,478
37,203
8,033
1,263,722
47,075
72,288
17,418
25,012
181
28,698
9,423
663,185
16,466
183,028
143,083
15,821
86,604
9,903
70,187
22,677
110,160
14,928
40,915
15,148
10,933
37,893,390
0
51,855
0
12,588
400
4,494
41,317
0
5,799
17,597
65,145
77,640,746
12,851,536
61,742,432
3,308
2,929
2,024
777
197,065
562,050,106
24,791
0
34,548
3,006
85,282
3,523
15,687
7,707
487,891
17,494
12,958
49,799
68,136
52,268
37
78,718
101,859,551
32,796
13,078
3,056
196,546,125
1,695
127,041
9,312
2,791
72,449
4,754
10,038
11,985
8,027
528,021
24,095
27,106
14,553
12,734
160
11,651
9,393
345,248
5,832
127,690
12,235
4,250
24,147
3,850
11,828
8,874
21,472
7,403
18,944
10,613
9,746
15,207,566
0
14,803
0
12,587
246
3,405
27,387
0
2,578
11,575
51,127
71,706,500
2,361,108
31,926,179
3,308
1,743
1,810
766
67,710
422,284,785
POTW Removals
Removals Removal After POTW
(Ibs/yr) Efficiency (%) (Ibs/yr)
18,890
0
1,942
8,257
52,274
6,406
0
3,798
238,270
10,046
14
21,376
0
18,712
2
63,736
8,310,821
1,776
26,146
2,226
60,112,698
753
221
5,821
2,089
58,932
11,440
3,440
25,217
5
735,701
22,979
45,182
2,865
12,279
21
17,047
30
317,937
10,635
55,338
130,848
11,572
62,457
6,053
58,359
13,803
88,689
7,524
21,972
4,535
1,186
22,685,824
0
37,052
0
0
154
1,089
13,930
0
3,221
6,022
14,018
5,934,246
10,490,428
29,816,253
0
1,186
214
11
129,355
139,765,321
24%
62%
18%
28%
85%
63%
18%
18%
88%
72%
40%
35%
81%
33%
61%
60%
91%
14%
86%
91%
82%
24%
24%
91%
4%
84%
75%
33%
33%
33%
83%
62%
92%
33%
41%
33%
18%
52%
33%
94%
33%
33%
94%
33%
94%
33%
94%
33%
94%
18%
52%
33%
87%
72%
99%
91%
95%
34%
80%
33%
28%
65%
69%
33%
71%
74%
91%
33%
33%
42%
58%
77%
14,357
0
1,592
5,945
7,841
2,370
0
3,114
28,592
2,813
8
13,894
0
12,537
1
25,494
747,974
1,527
3,660
200
10,820,286
572
168
524
2,005
9,429
2,860
2,305
16,896
4
125,069
8,732
3,615
1,919
7,244
14
13,978
15
213,018
638
37,076
87,668
694
41,846
363
39,100
828
59,421
451
18,017
2,177
795
2,949,157
0
371
0
0
102
218
9,333
0
1,128
1,867
9,392
1,720,931
2,727,511
2,683,463
0
794
124
5
29,752
22,523,797
Toxic
Weighting PE
Factor Removals
4.30E-003
1.20E+000
2.20E-005
1.80E-002
7.60E-006
4.30E-003
1.20E-004
l.OOE-003
6.40E-002
1.90E-001
4.00E+000
2.00E-003
3.30E-004
5.60E-003
5.30E+000
1.10E-001
O.OOE+000
1.80E-001
2.30E-002
5.20E+000
O.OOE+000
2.90E-003
2.10E-003
2.70E-002
1.10E-001
4.70E-001
1.20E-002
2.20E-001
1.40E-003
3.40E-004
5.60E-003
7.30E-004
1.80E+000
1.50E-003
1.40E-002
5.00E+002
4.20E-004
2.00E-001
4.30E-003
8.20E-005
4.30E-003
4.30E-003
8.20E-005
4.30E-003
8.20E-005
4.30E-003
8.20E-005
4.30E-003
8.20E-005
1.50E-002
3.60E-002
8.50E-003
O.OOE+000
2.40E-003
4.30E-002
2.90E-001
2.80E-002
1.10E+000
4.70E+001
7.40E-002
1.40E-001
3.00E-001
2.90E-002
5.60E-003
O.OOE+000
O.OOE+000
O.OOE+000
9.30E-005
6.30E-002
6.20E-001
O.OOE+000
5.10E-002
62
0
0
107
0
10
0
3
1,830
534
33
28
0
70
4
2,804
0
275
84
1,042
0
2
0
14
221
4,432
34
507
24
0
700
6
6,506
3
101
7,154
6
3
916
0
159
377
0
180
0
168
0
256
0
270
78
7
0
0
16
0
0
112
10,236
691
0
338
54
53
0
0
0
0
50
77
0
1,517
42,155
Source: Development Document.
A-2
-------
Table A-3
Industry Loads and Removals By Pollutant
CP-IL Option, 3MM/120K Cutoff
Pollutant
Code
Til
T37
N34
N38
N42
T22
N54
N58
AL
SB
AS
BA
N64
N66
BE
T66
BOD
B
T67
CD
COD
T7
T23
CR
CO
CU
T68
T69
T38
N90
FE
T54
PB
N95
MN
HG
T44
MO
N102
N103
N104
N105
N106
N107
N114
N115
N116
N117
N118
T55
NI
N119
HEM
N125
N126
N130
T65
SE
AG
T85
TL
SN
TI
T86
TOG
SHEM
TS
T30
T87
V
Y
ZN
Industry Baseline Industry Treated
Analyte Load (Ibs/yr) Load (Ibs/yr)
1,1,1 -TRICHLOROETHANE
1 ,2-DIPHENYLHYDRAZINE
2-BUTANONE
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
2-PROPANONE
4-CHLORO-3-METHYLPHENOL
4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE
ALPHA-TERPrNEOL
ALUMINUM
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BENZOIC ACID
BENZYL ALCOHOL
BERYLLIUM
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
BOD 5-DAY (CARBONACEOUS)
BORON
BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
CADMIUM
CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND (COD)
CHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROFORM
CHROMIUM
COBALT
COPPER
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE
ETHYLBENZENE
HEXANOIC ACID
IRON
ISOPHORONE
LEAD
M-XYLENE
MANGANESE
MERCURY
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
MOLYBDENUM
N-DECANE
N-DOCOSANE
N-DODECANE
N-EICOSANE
N-HEXACOSANE
N-HEXADECANE
N-OCTACOSANE
N-OCTADECANE
N-TETRACOSANE
N-TETRADECANE
N-TRIACONTANE
NAPHTHALENE
NICKEL
0+P XYLENE
OIL AND GREASE (AS HEM)
P-CRESOL
P-CYMENE
PENTAMETHYLBENZENE
PHENOL
SELENIUM
SILVER
TETRACHLOROETHENE
THALLIUM
TIN
TITANIUM
TOLUENE
TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON (TOC)
TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON
TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS
TRANS-1 ,2-DICHLOROETHENE
TRICHLOROETHENE
VANADIUM
YTTRIUM
ZINC
Totals
40,464
0
33,983
10,198
131,729
8,850
14,651
10,908
669,275
25,088
12,470
66,280
63,203
66,640
34
132,825
104,120,680
32,242
37,307
4,886
236,114,575
2,334
122,751
14,070
4,594
121,275
15,102
12,588
34,107
7,312
1,143,483
43,507
66,481
16,244
22,988
170
26,294
8,980
624,681
14,748
165,833
128,002
14,359
78,869
8,887
62,912
20,654
99,447
13,750
38,379
13,973
10,270
35,269,760
0
49,931
0
11,871
352
4,250
37,725
0
5,133
16,066
61,674
72,968,740
11,766,277
56,330,170
3,146
2,820
1,890
737
178,466
521,262,341
21,771
0
32,042
2,809
79,572
3,084
14,651
7,153
459,847
16,613
12,457
46,738
63,203
48,148
32
75,404
95,859,747
30,466
12,546
2,886
179,609,548
1,582
122,530
8,606
2,540
67,715
4,507
9,410
10,354
7,306
495,084
21,043
25,349
13,392
12,027
151
10,235
8,949
332,492
5,537
112,032
11,687
3,996
22,975
3,577
11,169
8,464
20,406
7,045
17,820
9,914
9,084
14,441,421
0
14,211
0
11,871
215
3,224
24,074
0
2,238
10,776
47,706
67,073,873
2,195,097
29,835,581
3,146
1,634
1,684
726
62,860
391,526,031
POTW Removals
Removals Removal After POTW
(Ibs/yr) Efficiency (%) (Ibs/yr)
18,694
0
1,942
7,389
52,157
5,766
0
3,755
209,428
8,475
14
19,542
0
18,492
2
57,420
8,260,933
1,776
24,761
2,000
56,505,027
753
221
5,464
2,054
53,560
10,595
3,178
23,753
5
648,399
22,464
41,131
2,853
10,961
19
16,059
30
292,189
9,212
53,801
116,315
10,363
55,894
5,311
51,743
12,190
79,041
6,705
20,559
4,059
1,186
20,828,339
0
35,720
0
0
137
1,026
13,650
0
2,895
5,290
13,968
5,894,867
9,571,180
26,494,589
0
1,186
205
11
115,606
129,736,310
24%
62%
18%
28%
85%
63%
18%
18%
88%
72%
40%
35%
81%
33%
61%
60%
91%
14%
86%
91%
82%
24%
24%
91%
4%
84%
75%
33%
33%
33%
83%
62%
92%
33%
41%
33%
18%
52%
33%
94%
33%
33%
94%
33%
94%
33%
94%
33%
94%
18%
52%
33%
87%
72%
99%
91%
95%
34%
80%
33%
28%
65%
69%
33%
71%
74%
91%
33%
33%
42%
58%
77%
14,207
0
1,592
5,320
7,824
2,133
0
3,079
25,131
2,373
8
12,702
0
12,390
1
22,968
743,484
1,527
3,467
180
10,170,905
572
168
492
1,972
8,570
2,649
2,129
15,914
4
110,228
8,536
3,291
1,911
6,467
13
13,169
15
195,767
553
36,047
77,931
622
37,449
319
34,668
731
52,958
402
16,859
1,948
795
2,707,684
0
357
0
0
91
205
9,146
0
1,013
1,640
9,358
1,709,511
2,488,507
2,384,513
0
794
119
5
26,589
21,001,969
Toxic
Weighting PE
Factor Removals
4.30E-003
1.20E+000
2.20E-005
1.80E-002
7.60E-006
4.30E-003
1.20E-004
l.OOE-003
6.40E-002
1.90E-001
4.00E+000
2.00E-003
3.30E-004
5.60E-003
5.30E+000
1.10E-001
O.OOE+000
1.80E-001
2.30E-002
5.20E+000
O.OOE+000
2.90E-003
2.10E-003
2.70E-002
1.10E-001
4.70E-001
1.20E-002
2.20E-001
1.40E-003
3.40E-004
5.60E-003
7.30E-004
1.80E+000
1.50E-003
1.40E-002
5.00E+002
4.20E-004
2.00E-001
4.30E-003
8.20E-005
4.30E-003
4.30E-003
8.20E-005
4.30E-003
8.20E-005
4.30E-003
8.20E-005
4.30E-003
8.20E-005
1.50E-002
3.60E-002
8.50E-003
O.OOE+000
2.40E-003
4.30E-002
2.90E-001
2.80E-002
1.10E+000
4.70E+001
7.40E-002
1.40E-001
3.00E-001
2.90E-002
5.60E-003
O.OOE+000
O.OOE+000
O.OOE+000
9.30E-005
6.30E-002
6.20E-001
O.OOE+000
5.10E-002
61
0
0
96
0
9
0
3
1,608
451
33
25
0
69
4
2,526
0
275
80
936
0
2
0
13
217
4,028
32
468
22
0
617
6
5,923
3
91
6,356
6
3
842
0
155
335
0
161
0
149
0
228
0
253
70
7
0
0
15
0
0
100
9,643
677
0
304
48
52
0
0
0
0
50
74
0
1,356
38,483
Source: Development Document.
A-3
-------
Table A-4
Industry Loads and Removals By Pollutant
CP-IL Option, SMM/25SK Cutoff
Pollutant
Code
Til
T37
N34
N38
N42
T22
N54
N58
AL
SB
AS
BA
N64
N66
BE
T66
BOD
B
T67
CD
COD
T7
T23
CR
CO
CU
T68
T69
T38
N90
FE
T54
PB
N95
MN
HG
T44
MO
N102
N103
N104
N105
N106
N107
N114
N115
N116
N117
N118
T55
NI
N119
HEM
N125
N126
N130
T65
SE
AG
T85
TL
SN
TI
T86
TOG
SHEM
TS
T30
T87
V
Y
ZN
Industry Baseline Industry Treated
Analyte Load (Ibs/yr) Load (Ibs/yr)
1,1,1 -TRICHLOROETHANE
1 ,2-DIPHENYLHYDRAZINE
2-BUTANONE
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
2-PROPANONE
4-CHLORO-3-METHYLPHENOL
4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE
ALPHA-TERPrNEOL
ALUMINUM
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BENZOIC ACID
BENZYL ALCOHOL
BERYLLIUM
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
BOD 5-DAY (CARBONACEOUS)
BORON
BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
CADMIUM
CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND (COD)
CHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROFORM
CHROMIUM
COBALT
COPPER
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE
ETHYLBENZENE
HEXANOIC ACID
IRON
ISOPHORONE
LEAD
M-XYLENE
MANGANESE
MERCURY
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
MOLYBDENUM
N-DECANE
N-DOCOSANE
N-DODECANE
N-EICOSANE
N-HEXACOSANE
N-HEXADECANE
N-OCTACOSANE
N-OCTADECANE
N-TETRACOSANE
N-TETRADECANE
N-TRIACONTANE
NAPHTHALENE
NICKEL
0+P XYLENE
OIL AND GREASE (AS HEM)
P-CRESOL
P-CYMENE
PENTAMETHYLBENZENE
PHENOL
SELENIUM
SILVER
TETRACHLOROETHENE
THALLIUM
TIN
TITANIUM
TOLUENE
TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON (TOC)
TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON
TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS
TRANS-1 ,2-DICHLOROETHENE
TRICHLOROETHENE
VANADIUM
YTTRIUM
ZINC
Totals
33,432
0
28,704
8,074
113,260
6,888
12,341
9,354
537,651
19,694
10,704
54,111
52,420
56,807
26
107,755
87,450,551
26,941
32,124
4,002
189,588,950
2,053
105,870
11,402
3,907
97,610
12,228
10,317
26,947
5,762
895,613
36,677
53,467
13,596
18,489
141
21,649
7,642
517,127
11,271
128,980
99,826
11,166
62,162
6,844
48,883
16,413
77,866
11,128
31,341
11,300
8,716
28,563,674
0
43,735
0
9,985
264
3,591
30,356
0
3,893
12,641
51,118
60,704,055
9,349,866
44,708,381
2,793
2,543
1,556
621
141,259
424,150,513
15,838
0
26,763
2,277
64,625
2,122
12,341
5,750
379,438
13,900
10,691
38,159
52,420
38,730
24
64,163
79,935,733
25,173
10,699
2,393
140,233,731
1,320
105,654
6,840
1,970
55,004
3,762
7,673
6,884
5,757
404,754
14,969
20,616
10,891
9,966
126
7,229
7,614
285,672
4,633
81,131
9,894
3,280
19,295
2,858
9,244
7,146
17,101
5,916
14,635
8,050
7,570
12,089,837
0
12,142
0
9,984
151
2,685
17,410
0
1,552
8,672
38,492
55,307,428
1,763,841
24,186,232
2,793
1,375
1,375
612
50,361
315,577,367
POTW Removals
Removals Removal After POTW
(Ibs/yr) Efficiency (%) (Ibs/yr)
17,593
0
1,942
5,798
48,634
4,766
0
3,604
158,214
5,794
13
15,952
0
18,077
2
43,592
7,514,818
1,767
21,425
1,608
49,355,219
733
216
4,562
1,936
42,605
8,465
2,644
20,064
5
490,858
21,708
32,851
2,706
8,523
15
14,420
28
231,455
6,638
47,849
89,933
7,885
42,867
3,987
39,639
9,267
60,765
5,212
16,706
3,251
1,146
16,473,837
0
31,593
0
0
114
906
12,945
0
2,341
3,969
12,626
5,396,627
7,586,025
20,522,150
0
1,168
181
10
90,897
108,573,146
24%
62%
18%
28%
85%
63%
18%
18%
88%
72%
40%
35%
81%
33%
61%
60%
91%
14%
86%
91%
82%
24%
24%
91%
4%
84%
75%
33%
33%
33%
83%
62%
92%
33%
41%
33%
18%
52%
33%
94%
33%
33%
94%
33%
94%
33%
94%
33%
94%
18%
52%
33%
87%
72%
99%
91%
95%
34%
80%
33%
28%
65%
69%
33%
71%
74%
91%
33%
33%
42%
58%
77%
13,371
0
1,592
4,174
7,295
1,764
0
2,955
18,986
1,622
8
10,369
0
12,111
1
17,437
676,334
1,520
2,999
145
8,883,939
557
165
411
1,859
6,817
2,116
1,771
13,443
4
83,446
8,249
2,628
1,813
5,028
10
11,824
14
155,075
398
32,059
60,255
473
28,721
239
26,558
556
40,712
313
13,699
1,560
768
2,141,599
0
316
0
0
75
181
8,673
0
819
1,230
8,460
1,565,022
1,972,367
1,846,993
0
783
105
4
20,906
17,725,696
Toxic
Weighting PE
Factor Removals
4.30E-003
1.20E+000
2.20E-005
1.80E-002
7.60E-006
4.30E-003
1.20E-004
l.OOE-003
6.40E-002
1.90E-001
4.00E+000
2.00E-003
3.30E-004
5.60E-003
5.30E+000
1.10E-001
O.OOE+000
1.80E-001
2.30E-002
5.20E+000
O.OOE+000
2.90E-003
2.10E-003
2.70E-002
1.10E-001
4.70E-001
1.20E-002
2.20E-001
1.40E-003
3.40E-004
5.60E-003
7.30E-004
1.80E+000
1.50E-003
1.40E-002
5.00E+002
4.20E-004
2.00E-001
4.30E-003
8.20E-005
4.30E-003
4.30E-003
8.20E-005
4.30E-003
8.20E-005
4.30E-003
8.20E-005
4.30E-003
8.20E-005
1.50E-002
3.60E-002
8.50E-003
O.OOE+000
2.40E-003
4.30E-002
2.90E-001
2.80E-002
1.10E+000
4.70E+001
7.40E-002
1.40E-001
3.00E-001
2.90E-002
5.60E-003
O.OOE+000
O.OOE+000
O.OOE+000
9.30E-005
6.30E-002
6.20E-001
O.OOE+000
5.10E-002
57
0
0
75
0
8
0
3
1,215
308
31
21
0
68
4
1,918
0
274
69
753
0
2
0
11
204
3,204
25
390
19
0
467
6
4,731
3
70
4,953
5
3
667
0
138
259
0
124
0
114
0
175
0
205
56
7
0
0
14
0
0
82
8,514
642
0
246
36
47
0
0
0
0
49
65
0
1,066
31,403
Source: Development Document.
A-4
-------
Industry Loads and Removals By Pollutant
DAF-IL Option, No Cutoff
Pollutant
Code
Til
T37
N34
N38
N42
T22
N54
N58
AL
SB
AS
BA
N64
N66
BE
T66
BOD
B
T67
CD
COD
T7
T23
CR
CO
CU
T68
T69
T38
N90
FE
T54
PB
N95
MN
HO
T44
MO
N102
N103
N104
N105
N106
N107
N114
N115
N116
N117
N118
T55
NI
N119
HEM
N125
N126
N130
T65
SE
AO
T85
TL
SN
TI
T86
TOG
SHEM
TS
T30
T87
V
Y
ZN
Industry Baseline Industry Treated
Analyte Load (Ibs/yr) Load (Ibs/yr)
1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
1,2-DIPHENYLHYDRAZINE
2-BUTANONE
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
2-PROPANONE
4-CHLORO-3-METHYLPHENOL
4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE
ALPHA-TERPINEOL
ALUMINUM
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BENZOIC ACID
BENZYL ALCOHOL
BERYLLIUM
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
BOD 5-DAY (CARBONACEOUS)
BORON
BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
CADMIUM
CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND (COD)
CHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROFORM
CHROMIUM
COBALT
COPPER
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE
ETHYLBENZENE
HEXANOIC ACID
IRON
ISOPHORONE
LEAD
M-XYLENE
MANGANESE
MERCURY
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
MOLYBDENUM
N-DECANE
N-DOCOSANE
N-DODECANE
N-EICOSANE
N-HEXACOSANE
N-HEXADECANE
N-OCTACOSANE
N-OCTADECANE
N-TETRACOSANE
N-TETRADECANE
N-TRIACONTANE
NAPHTHALENE
NICKEL
O+P XYLENE
OIL AND GREASE (AS HEM)
P-CRESOL
P-CYMENE
PENTAMETHYLBENZENE
PHENOL
SELENIUM
SILVER
TETRACHLOROETHENE
THALLIUM
TIN
TITANIUM
TOLUENE
TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON (TOC)
TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON
TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS
TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
TRICHLOROETHENE
VANADIUM
YTTRIUM
ZINC
Totals
44,354
0
37,079
11,420
139,704
10,048
15,946
11,666
731,628
27,706
13,064
72,023
68,837
71,863
39
143,930
111,166,461
34,933
39,666
5,345
259,751,769
2,487
128,187
15,303
4,940
132,972
16,435
13,633
38,046
8,077
1,275,369
47,778
73,428
17,712
25,269
182
29,221
9,542
673,669
16,653
186,284
146,471
16,085
88,172
10,047
71,627
22,929
112,400
15,088
41,634
15,287
11,110
38,519,591
0
52,508
0
12,686
403
4,535
42,301
0
5,854
17,716
66,379
78,340,477
13,109,842
62,531,426
3,358
2,971
2,040
783
199,400
568,575,789
2,377
0
37,078
9,803
139,280
9,364
15,786
11,643
489,482
19,540
13,063
43,084
68,014
71,862
39
85,188
105,943,546
34,376
25,872
3,607
180,887,567
1,616
128,182
11,193
3,704
89,894
12,065
9,687
5,741
8,077
614,767
47,778
33,574
16,512
12,989
155
27,554
8,803
377,128
6,818
52,336
14,929
4,796
27,715
3,383
15,051
9,701
24,465
7,317
20,447
10,763
10,799
16,035,628
0
19,495
0
12,678
403
4,063
20,512
0
4,934
9,132
46,162
72,858,026
2,671,268
29,879,620
3,358
2,971
1,790
740
112,848
411,212,139
POTW Removals
Removals Removal After POTW
(Ibs/yr) Efficiency (%) (Ibs/yr)
41,976
0
0
1,618
424
684
159
23
242,147
8,167
0
28,939
823
0
0
58,741
5,222,915
557
13,795
1,737
78,864,203
871
5
4,110
1,237
43,078
4,370
3,946
32,305
0
660,602
0
39,854
1,200
12,280
28
1,667
740
296,541
9,834
133,947
131,541
11,289
60,457
6,664
56,576
13,228
87,934
7,771
21,188
4,524
311
22,483,963
0
33,013
0
7
0
472
21,790
0
920
8,584
20,217
5,482,451
10,438,574
32,651,807
0
0
249
42
86,553
157,363,650
24%
62%
18%
28%
85%
63%
18%
18%
88%
72%
40%
35%
81%
33%
61%
60%
91%
14%
86%
91%
82%
24%
24%
91%
4%
84%
75%
33%
33%
33%
83%
62%
92%
33%
41%
33%
18%
52%
33%
94%
33%
33%
94%
33%
94%
33%
94%
33%
94%
18%
52%
33%
87%
72%
99%
91%
95%
34%
80%
33%
28%
65%
69%
33%
71%
74%
91%
33%
33%
42%
58%
77%
31,902
0
0
1,165
64
253
131
19
29,058
2,287
0
18,811
156
0
0
23,497
470,062
479
1,931
156
14,195,556
662
4
370
1,187
6,892
1,092
2,644
21,645
0
112,302
0
3,188
804
7,245
18
1,367
355
198,683
590
89,745
88,133
677
40,506
400
37,906
794
58,916
466
17,374
2,172
209
2,922,915
0
330
0
0
0
94
14,599
0
322
2,661
13,545
1,589,911
2,714,029
2,938,663
0
0
145
18
19,907
25,689,012
Toxic
Weighting PE
Factor Removals
4.30E-003
1.20E+000
2.20E-005
1.80E-002
7.60E-006
4.30E-003
1.20E-004
l.OOE-003
6.40E-002
1.90E-001
4.00E+000
2.00E-003
3.30E-004
5.60E-003
5.30E+000
1.10E-001
O.OOE+000
1.80E-001
2.30E-002
5.20E+000
O.OOE+000
2.90E-003
2.10E-003
2.70E-002
1.10E-001
4.70E-001
1.20E-002
2.20E-001
1.40E-003
3.40E-004
5.60E-003
7.30E-004
1.80E+000
1.50E-003
1.40E-002
5.00E+002
4.20E-004
2.00E-001
4.30E-003
8.20E-005
4.30E-003
4.30E-003
8.20E-005
4.30E-003
8.20E-005
4.30E-003
8.20E-005
4.30E-003
8.20E-005
1.50E-002
3.60E-002
8.50E-003
O.OOE+000
2.40E-003
4.30E-002
2.90E-001
2.80E-002
1.10E+000
4.70E+001
7.40E-002
1.40E-001
3.00E-001
2.90E-002
5.60E-003
O.OOE+000
O.OOE+000
O.OOE+000
9.30E-005
6.30E-002
6.20E-001
O.OOE+000
5.10E-002
137
0
0
21
0
1
0
0
1,860
434
1
38
0
0
0
2,585
0
86
44
813
0
2
0
10
131
3,239
13
582
30
0
629
0
5,739
1
101
9,239
1
71
854
0
386
379
0
174
0
163
0
253
0
261
78
2
0
0
14
0
0
0
4,437
1,080
0
97
77
76
0
0
0
0
0
90
0
1,015
35,245
Source: Development Document.
-------
Industry Loads and Removals By Pollutant
DAF-IL Option, 1MM/255K Cutoff
Pollutant
Code
Til
T37
N34
N38
N42
T22
N54
N58
AL
SB
AS
BA
N64
N66
BE
T66
BOD
B
T67
CD
COD
T7
T23
CR
CO
CU
T68
T69
T38
N90
FE
T54
PB
N95
MN
HO
T44
MO
N102
N103
N104
N105
N106
N107
N114
N115
N116
N117
N118
T55
NI
N119
HEM
N125
N126
N130
T65
SE
AO
T85
TL
SN
TI
T86
TOC
SHEM
TS
T30
T87
V
Y
ZN
Industry Baseline Industry Treated
Analyte Load (Ibs/yr) Load (Ibs/yr)
1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
1,2-DIPHENYLHYDRAZINE
2-BUTANONE
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
2-PROPANONE
4-CHLORO-3-METHYLPHENOL
4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE
ALPHA-TERPINEOL
ALUMINUM
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BENZOIC ACID
BENZYL ALCOHOL
BERYLLIUM
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
BOD 5-DAY (CARBONACEOUS)
BORON
BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
CADMIUM
CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND (COD)
CHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROFORM
CHROMIUM
COBALT
COPPER
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE
ETHYLBENZENE
HEXANOIC ACID
IRON
ISOPHORONE
LEAD
M-XYLENE
MANGANESE
MERCURY
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
MOLYBDENUM
N-DECANE
N-DOCOSANE
N-DODECANE
N-EICOSANE
N-HEXACOSANE
N-HEXADECANE
N-OCTACOSANE
N-OCTADECANE
N-TETRACOSANE
N-TETRADECANE
N-TRIACONTANE
NAPHTHALENE
NICKEL
O+P XYLENE
OIL AND GREASE (AS HEM)
P-CRESOL
P-CYMENE
PENTAMETHYLBENZENE
PHENOL
SELENIUM
SILVER
TETRACHLOROETHENE
THALLIUM
TIN
TITANIUM
TOLUENE
TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON (TOC)
TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON
TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS
TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
TRICHLOROETHENE
VANADIUM
YTTRIUM
ZINC
Totals
43,682
0
36,490
11,262
137,556
9,930
15,687
11,504
726,162
27,540
12,972
71,175
68,136
70,980
39
142,454
110,170,372
34,572
39,223
5,281
256,658,823
2,448
127,263
15,133
4,879
131,381
16,193
13,478
37,203
8,033
1,263,722
47,075
72,288
17,418
25,012
181
28,698
9,423
663,185
16,466
183,028
143,083
15,821
86,604
9,903
70,187
22,677
110,160
14,928
40,915
15,148
10,933
37,893,390
0
51,855
0
12,588
400
4,494
41,317
0
5,799
17,597
65,145
77,640,746
12,851,536
61,742,432
3,308
2,929
2,024
777
197,065
562,050,106
2,372
0
36,490
9,731
137,160
9,309
15,573
11,482
486,090
19,407
12,972
42,786
67,346
70,980
39
84,589
105,209,109
34,111
25,686
3,583
179,662,938
1,605
127,257
11,119
3,678
89,281
11,978
9,620
5,705
8,033
610,539
47,075
33,345
16,380
12,899
154
27,348
8,734
374,463
6,771
52,010
14,825
4,763
27,522
3,360
14,946
9,633
24,295
7,266
20,306
10,689
10,696
15,923,719
0
19,359
0
12,580
400
4,035
20,388
0
4,903
9,069
45,834
72,361,602
2,653,006
29,673,939
3,308
2,929
1,778
735
112,070
408,397,699
POTW Removals
Removals Removal After POTW
(Ibs/yr) Efficiency (%) (Ibs/yr)
41,310
0
0
1,531
396
621
114
23
240,072
8,132
0
28,389
790
0
0
57,865
4,961,263
460
13,537
1,699
76,995,885
843
5
4,014
1,201
42,100
4,216
3,858
31,498
0
653,182
0
38,943
1,038
12,114
27
1,349
690
288,722
9,696
131,018
128,258
11,058
59,082
6,544
55,240
13,044
85,866
7,662
20,609
4,459
237
21,969,671
0
32,496
0
7
0
459
20,929
0
897
8,528
19,311
5,279,144
10,198,530
32,068,493
0
0
245
42
84,995
153,652,407
24%
62%
18%
28%
85%
63%
18%
18%
88%
72%
40%
35%
81%
33%
61%
60%
91%
14%
86%
91%
82%
24%
24%
91%
4%
84%
75%
33%
33%
33%
83%
62%
92%
33%
41%
33%
18%
52%
33%
94%
33%
33%
94%
33%
94%
33%
94%
33%
94%
18%
52%
33%
87%
72%
99%
91%
95%
34%
80%
33%
28%
65%
69%
33%
71%
74%
91%
33%
33%
42%
58%
77%
31,396
0
0
1,102
59
230
93
19
28,809
2,277
0
18,453
150
0
0
23,146
446,514
396
1,895
153
13,859,259
641
4
361
1,153
6,736
1,054
2,585
21,104
0
111,041
0
3,115
696
7,147
18
1,106
331
193,444
582
87,782
85,933
664
39,585
393
37,011
783
57,530
460
16,900
2,140
159
2,856,057
0
325
0
0
0
92
14,023
0
314
2,644
12,938
1,530,952
2,651,618
2,886,164
0
0
142
18
19,549
25,069,242
Toxic
Weighting PE
Factor Removals
4.30E-003
1.20E+000
2.20E-005
1.80E-002
7.60E-006
4.30E-003
1.20E-004
l.OOE-003
6.40E-002
1.90E-001
4.00E+000
2.00E-003
3.30E-004
5.60E-003
5.30E+000
1.10E-001
O.OOE+000
1.80E-001
2.30E-002
5.20E+000
O.OOE+000
2.90E-003
2.10E-003
2.70E-002
1.10E-001
4.70E-001
1.20E-002
2.20E-001
1.40E-003
3.40E-004
5.60E-003
7.30E-004
1.80E+000
1.50E-003
1.40E-002
5.00E+002
4.20E-004
2.00E-001
4.30E-003
8.20E-005
4.30E-003
4.30E-003
8.20E-005
4.30E-003
8.20E-005
4.30E-003
8.20E-005
4.30E-003
8.20E-005
1.50E-002
3.60E-002
8.50E-003
O.OOE+000
2.40E-003
4.30E-002
2.90E-001
2.80E-002
1.10E+000
4.70E+001
7.40E-002
1.40E-001
3.00E-001
2.90E-002
5.60E-003
O.OOE+000
O.OOE+000
O.OOE+000
9.30E-005
6.30E-002
6.20E-001
O.OOE+000
5.10E-002
135
0
0
20
0
1
0
0
1,844
433
1
37
0
0
0
2,546
0
71
44
795
0
2
0
10
127
3,166
13
569
30
0
622
0
5,608
1
100
9,125
0
66
832
0
377
370
0
170
0
159
0
247
0
253
77
1
0
0
14
0
0
0
4,311
1,038
0
94
77
72
0
0
0
0
0
88
0
997
34,542
Source: Development Document.
-------
Industry Loads and Removals By Pollutant
DAF-IL Option, 3MM/120K Cutoff
Pollutant
Code
Til
T37
N34
N38
N42
T22
N54
N58
AL
SB
AS
BA
N64
N66
BE
T66
BOD
B
T67
CD
COD
T7
T23
CR
CO
CU
T68
T69
T38
N90
FE
T54
PB
N95
MN
HO
T44
MO
N102
N103
N104
N105
N106
N107
N114
N115
N116
N117
N118
T55
NI
N119
HEM
N125
N126
N130
T65
SE
AO
T85
TL
SN
TI
T86
TOC
SHEM
TS
T30
T87
V
Y
ZN
Industry Baseline Industry Treated
Analyte Load (Ibs/yr) Load (Ibs/yr)
1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
1,2-DIPHENYLHYDRAZINE
2-BUTANONE
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
2-PROPANONE
4-CHLORO-3-METHYLPHENOL
4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE
ALPHA-TERPINEOL
ALUMINUM
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BENZOIC ACID
BENZYL ALCOHOL
BERYLLIUM
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
BOD 5-DAY (CARBONACEOUS)
BORON
BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
CADMIUM
CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND (COD)
CHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROFORM
CHROMIUM
COBALT
COPPER
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE
ETHYLBENZENE
HEXANOIC ACID
IRON
ISOPHORONE
LEAD
M-XYLENE
MANGANESE
MERCURY
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
MOLYBDENUM
N-DECANE
N-DOCOSANE
N-DODECANE
N-EICOSANE
N-HEXACOSANE
N-HEXADECANE
N-OCTACOSANE
N-OCTADECANE
N-TETRACOSANE
N-TETRADECANE
N-TRIACONTANE
NAPHTHALENE
NICKEL
O+P XYLENE
OIL AND GREASE (AS HEM)
P-CRESOL
P-CYMENE
PENTAMETHYLBENZENE
PHENOL
SELENIUM
SILVER
TETRACHLOROETHENE
THALLIUM
TIN
TITANIUM
TOLUENE
TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON (TOC)
TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON
TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS
TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
TRICHLOROETHENE
VANADIUM
YTTRIUM
ZINC
Totals
40,464
0
33,983
10,198
131,729
8,850
14,651
10,908
669,275
25,088
12,470
66,280
63,203
66,640
34
132,825
104,120,680
32,242
37,307
4,886
236,114,575
2,334
122,751
14,070
4,594
121,275
15,102
12,588
34,107
7,312
1,143,483
43,507
66,481
16,244
22,988
170
26,294
8,980
624,681
14,748
165,833
128,002
14,359
78,869
8,887
62,912
20,654
99,447
13,750
38,379
13,973
10,270
35,269,760
0
49,931
0
11,871
352
4,250
37,725
0
5,133
16,066
61,674
72,968,740
11,766,277
56,330,170
3,146
2,820
1,890
737
178,466
521,262,341
2,255
0
33,983
8,683
131,334
8,229
14,537
10,885
458,327
18,264
12,470
40,820
62,413
66,640
34
80,421
99,172,611
31,782
23,856
3,342
165,442,212
1,493
122,746
10,171
3,397
82,192
10,939
9,058
5,031
7,312
566,093
43,507
30,729
15,206
12,167
146
24,944
8,290
357,429
6,345
48,770
13,916
4,438
25,876
3,162
13,862
9,114
22,833
6,929
18,987
9,979
10,033
15,052,637
0
18,155
0
11,864
352
3,793
17,821
0
4,255
8,665
42,501
67,714,343
2,446,918
27,935,334
3,146
2,820
1,659
696
101,143
380,494,295
POTW Removals
Removals Removal After POTW
(Ibs/yr) Efficiency (%) (Ibs/yr)
38,210
0
0
1,515
396
621
114
23
210,948
6,824
0
25,460
790
0
0
52,404
4,948,069
460
13,451
1,544
70,672,363
841
5
3,898
1,198
39,082
4,163
3,530
29,076
0
577,390
0
35,752
1,038
10,821
24
1,349
690
267,251
8,403
117,063
114,086
9,921
52,992
5,726
49,051
11,540
76,614
6,821
19,392
3,994
237
20,217,122
0
31,776
0
7
0
457
19,904
0
878
7,400
19,173
5,254,397
9,319,359
28,394,836
0
0
231
41
77,323
140,768,046
24%
62%
18%
28%
85%
63%
18%
18%
88%
72%
40%
35%
81%
33%
61%
60%
91%
14%
86%
91%
82%
24%
24%
91%
4%
84%
75%
33%
33%
33%
83%
62%
92%
33%
41%
33%
18%
52%
33%
94%
33%
33%
94%
33%
94%
33%
94%
33%
94%
18%
52%
33%
87%
72%
99%
91%
95%
34%
80%
33%
28%
65%
69%
33%
71%
74%
91%
33%
33%
42%
58%
77%
29,039
0
0
1,091
59
230
93
19
25,314
1,911
0
16,549
150
0
0
20,962
445,326
396
1,883
139
12,721,025
639
4
351
1,150
6,253
1,041
2,365
19,481
0
98,156
0
2,860
696
6,384
16
1,106
331
179,058
504
78,432
76,438
595
35,505
344
32,864
692
51,331
409
15,902
1,917
159
2,628,226
0
318
0
0
0
91
13,335
0
307
2,294
12,846
1,523,775
2,423,033
2,555,535
0
0
134
17
17,784
23,056,868
Toxic
Weighting PE
Factor Removals
4.30E-003
1.20E+000
2.20E-005
1.80E-002
7.60E-006
4.30E-003
1.20E-004
l.OOE-003
6.40E-002
1.90E-001
4.00E+000
2.00E-003
3.30E-004
5.60E-003
5.30E+000
1.10E-001
O.OOE+000
1.80E-001
2.30E-002
5.20E+000
O.OOE+000
2.90E-003
2.10E-003
2.70E-002
1.10E-001
4.70E-001
1.20E-002
2.20E-001
1.40E-003
3.40E-004
5.60E-003
7.30E-004
1.80E+000
1.50E-003
1.40E-002
5.00E+002
4.20E-004
2.00E-001
4.30E-003
8.20E-005
4.30E-003
4.30E-003
8.20E-005
4.30E-003
8.20E-005
4.30E-003
8.20E-005
4.30E-003
8.20E-005
1.50E-002
3.60E-002
8.50E-003
O.OOE+000
2.40E-003
4.30E-002
2.90E-001
2.80E-002
1.10E+000
4.70E+001
7.40E-002
1.40E-001
3.00E-001
2.90E-002
5.60E-003
O.OOE+000
O.OOE+000
O.OOE+000
9.30E-005
6.30E-002
6.20E-001
O.OOE+000
5.10E-002
125
0
0
20
0
1
0
0
1,620
363
1
33
0
0
0
2,306
0
71
43
723
0
2
0
9
126
2,939
12
520
27
0
550
0
5,148
1
89
8,002
0
66
770
0
337
329
0
153
0
141
0
221
0
239
69
1
0
0
14
0
0
0
4,296
987
0
92
67
72
0
0
0
0
0
83
0
907
31,577
Source: Development Document.
-------
Industry Loads and Removals By Pollutant
DAF-IL Option, 5MM/255K Cutoff
Pollutant
Code
Til
T37
N34
N38
N42
T22
N54
N58
AL
SB
AS
BA
N64
N66
BE
T66
BOD
B
T67
CD
COD
T7
T23
CR
CO
CU
T68
T69
T38
N90
FE
T54
PB
N95
MN
HO
T44
MO
N102
N103
N104
N105
N106
N107
N114
N115
N116
N117
N118
T55
NI
N119
HEM
N125
N126
N130
T65
SE
AO
T85
TL
SN
TI
T86
TOC
SHEM
TS
T30
T87
V
Y
ZN
Industry Baseline Industry Treated
Analyte Load (Ibs/yr) Load (Ibs/yr)
1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
1,2-DIPHENYLHYDRAZINE
2-BUTANONE
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
2-PROPANONE
4-CHLORO-3-METHYLPHENOL
4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE
ALPHA-TERPINEOL
ALUMINUM
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BENZOIC ACID
BENZYL ALCOHOL
BERYLLIUM
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
BOD 5-DAY (CARBONACEOUS)
BORON
BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
CADMIUM
CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND (COD)
CHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROFORM
CHROMIUM
COBALT
COPPER
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE
ETHYLBENZENE
HEXANOIC ACID
IRON
ISOPHORONE
LEAD
M-XYLENE
MANGANESE
MERCURY
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
MOLYBDENUM
N-DECANE
N-DOCOSANE
N-DODECANE
N-EICOSANE
N-HEXACOSANE
N-HEXADECANE
N-OCTACOSANE
N-OCTADECANE
N-TETRACOSANE
N-TETRADECANE
N-TRIACONTANE
NAPHTHALENE
NICKEL
O+P XYLENE
OIL AND GREASE (AS HEM)
P-CRESOL
P-CYMENE
PENTAMETHYLBENZENE
PHENOL
SELENIUM
SILVER
TETRACHLOROETHENE
THALLIUM
TIN
TITANIUM
TOLUENE
TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON (TOC)
TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON
TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS
TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
TRICHLOROETHENE
VANADIUM
YTTRIUM
ZINC
Totals
33,432
0
28,704
8,074
113,260
6,888
12,341
9,354
537,651
19,694
10,704
54,111
52,420
56,807
26
107,755
87,450,551
26,941
32,124
4,002
189,588,950
2,053
105,870
11,402
3,907
97,610
12,228
10,317
26,947
5,762
895,613
36,677
53,467
13,596
18,489
141
21,649
7,642
517,127
11,271
128,980
99,826
11,166
62,162
6,844
48,883
16,413
77,866
11,128
31,341
11,300
8,716
28,563,674
0
43,735
0
9,985
264
3,591
30,356
0
3,893
12,641
51,118
60,704,055
9,349,866
44,708,381
2,793
2,543
1,556
621
141,259
424,150,513
1,719
0
28,704
6,721
112,864
6,290
12,227
9,331
378,481
15,002
10,704
34,436
51,630
56,807
26
67,470
82,919,296
26,481
19,564
2,699
130,590,755
1,236
105,865
7,964
2,752
65,063
8,654
7,451
3,533
5,762
452,699
36,677
24,289
12,597
10,057
123
20,359
7,003
302,042
5,173
39,205
11,384
3,576
21,226
2,597
11,063
7,574
18,716
5,843
15,414
8,094
8,480
12,491,092
0
14,814
0
9,977
264
3,153
12,418
0
3,089
7,330
33,985
55,892,337
1,935,173
22,990,267
2,793
2,543
1,354
584
76,854
309,061,707
POTW Removals
Removals Removal After POTW
(Ibs/yr) Efficiency (%) (Ibs/yr)
31,712
0
0
1,354
395
598
114
23
159,170
4,692
0
19,675
790
0
0
40,286
4,531,255
460
12,560
1,303
58,998,195
817
5
3,438
1,155
32,547
3,574
2,866
23,414
0
442,913
0
29,178
999
8,432
18
1,290
639
215,085
6,098
89,775
88,442
7,590
40,936
4,247
37,820
8,839
59,149
5,284
15,927
3,206
237
16,072,582
0
28,922
0
7
0
438
17,937
0
805
5,312
17,132
4,811,719
7,414,694
21,718,114
0
0
202
37
64,405
115,088,807
24%
62%
18%
28%
85%
63%
18%
18%
88%
72%
40%
35%
81%
33%
61%
60%
91%
14%
86%
91%
82%
24%
24%
91%
4%
84%
75%
33%
33%
33%
83%
62%
92%
33%
41%
33%
18%
52%
33%
94%
33%
33%
94%
33%
94%
33%
94%
33%
94%
18%
52%
33%
87%
72%
99%
91%
95%
34%
80%
33%
28%
65%
69%
33%
71%
74%
91%
33%
33%
42%
58%
77%
24,101
0
0
975
59
221
93
19
19,100
1,314
0
12,789
150
0
0
16,114
407,813
396
1,758
117
10,619,675
621
4
309
1,109
5,207
893
1,920
15,688
0
75,295
0
2,334
669
4,975
12
1,058
307
144,107
366
60,149
59,256
455
27,427
255
25,339
530
39,630
317
13,061
1,539
158
2,089,436
0
289
0
0
0
88
12,018
0
282
1,647
11,479
1,395,398
1,927,820
1,954,630
0
0
117
16
14,813
18,995,720
Toxic
Weighting PE
Factor Removals
4.30E-003
1.20E+000
2.20E-005
1.80E-002
7.60E-006
4.30E-003
1.20E-004
l.OOE-003
6.40E-002
1.90E-001
4.00E+000
2.00E-003
3.30E-004
5.60E-003
5.30E+000
1.10E-001
O.OOE+000
1.80E-001
2.30E-002
5.20E+000
O.OOE+000
2.90E-003
2.10E-003
2.70E-002
1.10E-001
4.70E-001
1.20E-002
2.20E-001
1.40E-003
3.40E-004
5.60E-003
7.30E-004
1.80E+000
1.50E-003
1.40E-002
5.00E+002
4.20E-004
2.00E-001
4.30E-003
8.20E-005
4.30E-003
4.30E-003
8.20E-005
4.30E-003
8.20E-005
4.30E-003
8.20E-005
4.30E-003
8.20E-005
1.50E-002
3.60E-002
8.50E-003
O.OOE+000
2.40E-003
4.30E-002
2.90E-001
2.80E-002
1.10E+000
4.70E+001
7.40E-002
1.40E-001
3.00E-001
2.90E-002
5.60E-003
O.OOE+000
O.OOE+000
O.OOE+000
9.30E-005
6.30E-002
6.20E-001
O.OOE+000
5.10E-002
104
0
0
18
0
1
0
0
1,222
250
1
26
0
0
0
1,773
0
71
40
610
0
2
0
8
122
2,448
11
422
22
0
422
0
4,202
1
70
6,046
0
61
620
0
259
255
0
118
0
109
0
170
0
196
55
1
0
0
12
0
0
0
4,114
889
0
84
48
64
0
0
0
0
0
73
0
755
25,774
Source: Development Document.
-------
Appendix B
Supporting Documentation for
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis:
Cost Analysis
-------
Table B-l
Computation of Annualized Costs for CP-IL in 1993 and 1981 Dollars
Costs
CP IL
CP IL
CP IL
CP IL
no cutoff 1MM/255K 3MM/120K 5MM/255K
Capital Cost ($1993)
Annual O&M Cost ($1993)
Total Annualized Capital Cost ($1993)
Total Annual Cost ($1993)
Deflator
Total Cost ($1981)
$528,827,868
$123,057,702
$55,980,474
$179,038,176
0.6785
$121,477,403
$507,469,980
$116,835,047
$53,719,578
$170,554,625
0.6785
$115,721,313
$387,491,478
$89,155,808
$41,018,936
$130,174,744
0.6785
$88,323,564
$234,139,808
$52,866,169
$24,785,489
$77,651,658
0.6785
$52,686,650
Source: Capital and O&M Costs: Development Document; Deflator: Engineering News Record
Construction Cost Index, March 31, 1997.
B-l
-------
Table B-2
Computation of Annualized Costs for DAF-IL in 1993 and 1981 Dollars
Costs
DAF IL
DAF IL
DAF IL
DAF IL
no cutoff 1MM/255K 3MM/120K 5MM/255K
Capital Cost ($1993)
Annual O&M Cost ($1993)
Total Annualized Capital Cost ($1993)
Total Annual Cost ($1993)
Deflator
Total Cost ($1981)
$435,352,966
$148,560,743
$46,085,441
$194,646,184
0.6785
$132,067,436
$417,313,882
$142,276,538
$44,175,866
$186,452,404
0.6785
$126,507,956
$313,173,435
$111,909,982
$33,151,803
$145,061,785
0.6785
$98,424,421
$180,570,477
$69,533,822
$19,114,766
$88,648,588
0.6785
$60,148,067
Source: Capital and O&M Costs: Development Document; Deflator: Engineering News Record
Construction Cost Index, March 31, 1997.
B-2
------- |