-------
                                                                         DRAFT
                                                                       9/22/93
                                    NOTICES
      This document has been reviewed by the Environmental Research
Laboratories, Duluth, MN and Narragansett, RI, Office of Research and
Development and the Health and Ecological Criteria Division, Office of Science
and Technology, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and approved for
publication.

      Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute
endorsement or recommendation for use.

      This document is available to the public through the National Technical
Information Service (NTIS), 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161.
                                       11

-------
                                                                          DRAFT
                                                                        9/22/93
                                    FOREWORD
       Section  304(a)  (1)  of  the  Clean Water Act of  1977  (P.L. 95-217)  requires
 the Administrator of  the  Environmental  Protection Agency to  publish water
 quality criteria that accurately reflect  the  latest scientific  knowledge on
 the kind and extent of all  identifiable effects on  health and welfare  that
 might be expected from the  presence  of  pollutants in any body of  water,
 including ground water.   This  document  is a revision of  proposed  criteria
 based upon consideration  of  comments received from  other federal  agencies,
 state agencies,  special interest groups,  and  individual  scientists.  Criteria
 contained in this document  replace any  previously published  EPA aquatic  life
 criteria for the same pollutant(s).

       The term "water quality  criteria" is used in  two sections of  the Clean
 Water Act,  section 304(a)(l) and section  303(c){2).   The term has a different
.program impact in each section.   In  section 304, the term represents a non-
 regulatory,  scientific assessment of ecological effects.   Criteria  presented
 in  this document are  such scientific assessments.   If water  quality criteria
 associated with specific  stream  uses are  adopted by a state  as  water quality
 standards under section 303, they represent maximum acceptable  pollutant
 concentrations in ambient waters within that  state  that  are  enforced through
 issuance of discharge limitations in NPDES permits.   Water quality  criteria
 adopted in state water quality standards  could have the  same numerical values
 as  criteria developed under  section  304.   However,  in many situations  states
 might want to  modify  water  quality criteria developed under  section 304 to
 reflect local  environmental  conditions  and human exposure patterns.
 Alternatively,  states may use  different data  and assumptions than EPA  in
 deriving numeric criteria that are scientifically defensible and  protective of
 designated uses.   It  is not  until their adoption as part of  state water
 quality standards that criteria  become  regulatory.   Guidelines  to assist the
 states and Indian tribes  in  modifying the criteria  presented in this document
 are contained  in the  Water Quality Standards  Handbook (December 1983).  This
 handbook and additional guidance on  the development of water quality standards
 and other water-related programs of  this  Agency have been developed by the
 Office of Water.

       This  document,  if finalized, would  be guidance only.   It  would not
 establish or affect legal rights or  obligations.  It would not  establish a
 binding norm and would not be  finally determinative of the issues addressed.
 Agency decisions in any particular situation  will be made by applying  the
 Clean Water Act  and EPA regulations  on  the basis of specific facts  presented
 and scientific information then  available.
                                    Tudor T. Davies
                                    Director
                                    Office of Science and Technology

-------
                                                                         DRAFT
                                                                       9/22/93
                               ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Daniel J. Call
(freshwater author)
University of Wisconsin-Superior
Superior, Wisconsin
David J. Hansen
(saltwater author)
Environmental Research Laboratory
Narragansett, Rhode Island
Robert L. Spehar
(document coordinator)
Environmental Research Laboratory
Duluth, Minnesota
Suzanne M. Lussier
(saltwater coordinator)
Environmental Research Laboratory
Narragansett, Rhode Island
                                       IV

-------
                                                                         DRAFT
                                                                       9/22/93

                                   CONTENTS


                                                                           Page

Notices	    11

Foreword	•	,	     0.11.

Acknowledgments	    i-v

Tables	    vi-


Introduction	     1

Acute Toxicity to Aquatic Animals 	     3

Chronic Toxicity to Aquatic Animals  	  	     4

Toxicity to Aquatic Plants  ... 	     6

Bioaccumulation	     6

Other Data	     7

Unused Data	     8

Summary	     8

National Criteria		     9

Implementation	    10
References
                                                                             24

-------
DRAFT
9/22/93

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
TABLES


Ranked Genus Mean Acute Values with Species Mean Acute-Chronic


Other Data on Effects of 2 , 4-Dimethylphenol on Aquatic Organisms .

Page
12
15
17
20
21
22
vi

-------
                                                                         DRAFT
                                                                       9/22/93

Introduction    '

      2,4-Dimethylphenol  (2,4-DMP) is a naturally occurring, substituted

phenol derived from the cresol fraction of petroleum or coal tars by

fractional distillation and extraction with aqueous alkaline solutions (Gruse'

and Stevens 1942; Lowry 1963; Rudolfs 1953; U.S. EPA 1976).  2,4-DMP, also

known as'l-hydroxy-2,4-dimethylbenzene, m-xylenol, 2,4-xylenol or m-4-xylenol,

has the empirical formula C8H,0O  (Weast 1972).   2,4-DMP  is  used  commercially as

an important chemical feedstock or constituent for the manufacture of a wide

range of commercial products for industry and agriculture.  It is also used in

the manufacture of phenolic antioxidants, disinfectants, solvents,

Pharmaceuticals, insecticides, fungicides, plasticizers, rubber chemicals,

polyphenylene oxide, wetting agents, and dyestuffs; and is an additive or

constituent of lubricants, gasolines, and cresylic acid.  No direct commercial

application for 2,4-DMP appears to exist at present.

      Five other positional isomers of dimethylphenol or xylenol exist and

include 2,3-, 2,5-, 2,6-, 3,4-,  and 3,5-dimethylphenol.  Since these isomers

result from the different positioning of the two methyl groups on the phenol

ring, they are referred to as positional isomers.  As would be expected,  there

are variations in their physical, chemical, and biological properties.

      2,4-DMP has a molecular weight of 122.17 and in its normal state exists

as a colorless, crystalline solid (Bennet 1974; Weast 1972).  It has a melting

point of 27 to 28°C, a boiling point of 210°C (760 mm Hg), a vapor pressure of

1 mm Hg at 52.8°C, and a density of 0.9650 at 20°C (Bennet 1974; Jordan 1954;

Weast 1972).  2,4-DMP is slightly soluble in water and, as a weak acid (pK. of

10.6), is also soluble in alkaline solutions (Sober 1970).  2,4-DMP readily

dissolves in organic solvents such as alcohol and ether (Weast 1972).

      A large number of products utilize 2,4-DMP as a feedstock or

constituent.  Hence, disposal of chemical and industrial process wastes and

distribution from normal product applications represent feasible routes for

entry of 2,4-DMP into the environment.  Examples of the latter route include

pesticide applications, asphalt and roadway runoff, and the washing of dyeJ

-------
                                                                         DRAFT
                                                                       9/22/93
materials (U.S. EPA 1975).
      Information regarding the concentration, persistence, fate and effects
of 2,4-DMP in the environment is limited.  However, its presence in petroleum
distillate fractions and coal tars, together with its use as a chemical
feedstock or constituent for the manufacture of many products, clearly
indicate the potential for both point and nonpoint source water contamination.
2,4-DMP has been detected in the effluent from coal gasification plants and in
finished drinking water (Shackelford and Keith 1976).  The concentration of
2,4-DMP in sediments collected near the Los Angeles County Sanitation
District's sewage outfall located off of Palos Verdes, California, was 40
/jg/kg (Schwartz et al. 1985).  It was below detection limits at six other
stations located further away from the outfall (Schwartz et al. 1985).
      It is inferred that 2,4-dimethylphenol will undergo some photolysis in
well-aerated surface waters in spite of its apparent persistence (Callahan et
al. 1979).  Richards and Shieh (1986) rank it as a persistent, volatile and
accumulative chemical.  Callahan et al. (1979), on the other hand, indicate
that there should be little tendency for it to volatilize from water.  The
complete biodegradation of 2,4-DMP has been reported to occur in approximately
two months,  although the conditions were not stated (Rodd 1952).
      2,4-DMP can be oxidized to form pseudoquinone (Rodd 1952).  However, the
conditions required for this reaction generally are not found in the
environment.  2,4-DMP reacts with aqueous alkaline solutions to form the
corresponding salt.  Such salts are readily soluble in water, provided that an
alkaline pH is maintained.  The free position on the aromatic ring, ortho to
the hydroxyl group, may be alkylated (Kirk and Othmer 1964) or halogenated
(Rodd 1952).  However, such reactions have not been reported to occur under
normal environmental conditions.
      2,4-DMP causes a detectable odor in water when present at relatively low
concentrations  (Buikema et al. 1979).  Hoak  (1957) reported an odor threshold
of 55.5 jug/L.
      All concentrations reported herein are expressed as 2,4-DMP. The

-------
                                                                         DRAFT
                                                                       9/22/93

criteria presented herein supersede previous aquatic life water quality

criteria for 2,4-DMP (U.S. EPA 1980) because these new criteria were derived

using improved procedures and additional information.  Whenever adequately

justified, a national criterion may be replaced by a site-specific criterion

(U.S. EPA 1983a) that may include not only site-specific concentrations (U.S.

EPA 1983b) but also site-specific frequencies of allowed excursions (U.S.  EPA

1985).

      A comprehension of the "Guidelines for Deriving Numerical National Water

Quality Criteria for the Protection of Aquatic Organisms and Their Uses"

(Stephan et al. 1985),  hereafter referred to as the Guidelines, and the

response to public comment (U.S. EPA 1985) is necessary to evaluate the

following text, tables, and calculations.

      The latest comprehensive literature search for information for this

document was conducted in September, 1992.  Some more recent information is

included.
Acute Toxicitv to Aquatic Animals

      The data that are available according to the Guidelines concerning the

acute toxicity of 2,4-DMP are presented in Table 1.  Freshwater Species Mean

Acute Values were calculated according to the Guidelines as geometric means of

the available acute values.  Of the 12 freshwater genera for' which mean acute

values are available, the most sensitive genus, Ceriodaphnia, is about 20

times more sensitive than the most resistant, Lumbriculus.  Both the most

sensitive and most resistant genera are invertebrates.  Fish were intermediate

in sensitivity with a range in Genus Mean Acute Values from 6,300 ^g/L to

19,300 /^g/L.  The freshwater Final Acute Value for 2,4-DMP was calculated to

be 2,670 /jg/L using the procedure described in the Guidelines and the Genus

Mean Acute Values in Table 3.  The Final Acute Value is lower than the lowest

available freshwater Species Mean Acute Value.

      The acute toxicity of 2,4-DMP to resident North American saltwater

animals has been determined with six species of invertebrates and three

-------
                                                                         DRAFT
                                                                       9/22/93

species of fish (Table 1).  The acute toxicity of 2,4-DMP differs by a factor

of 42 for saltwater animals, with acute values based on 96-hr LCSOs ranging

from 1,320 pg/L for juvenile inland silversides, Menidia bervllina, to 55,900

pg/L for adult archiannelid worms, Dinophilus gyrociliatus (Thursby and Berry

1987a).  Mortality increased with increased duration during 96-hr tests with

six of seven species for which daily survival data are available.  The

saltwater Final Acute Value, based on nine Genus Mean Acute Values, is 548.8

fjg/L.  The Final Acute Value is lower than the lowest available saltwater

Species Mean Acute Value.
Chronic Toxicitv to Aquatic Animals

      The data that are available according to the Guidelines concerning the

chronic toxicity of 2,4-DMP are presented in Table 2.  The freshwater

cladoceran, Ceriodaphnia dubia, was tested in a 7-day life-cycle chronic

exposure (Spehar 1987).  Mean 2,4-DMP concentrations were 210, 470, 810, 1,870

and 3,410 /^g/L.  Survival was slightly reduced, but not significantly at these

concentrations.  However, young production was significantly lower (p <0.05)

than controls at the two highest concentrations, with reductions of about 64

and 90 percent in young produced at 1,870 and 3,410 jug/L, respectively.  The

chronic limits for this test were between 810 and 1,870 pg/L, which results in

a chronic value of 1,230 pg/L  (Table 2).  Division of the companion acute

value for Ceriodaphnia of 3,340 pg/L by the chronic value results in an

acute-chronic ratio of 2.715.

      Fathead minnows  (Pimephales promelas) were exposed to 2,4-DMP in a

32-day early life-stage test at concentrations of 900, 1,360, 1,970, 3,110,

and 5,130 pig/L (Holcombe et al. 1982).  The percentage of normal appear ir.v-

larvae at hatch was similar for each exposure as in the control.  Survival  of

juvenile fish was reduced at the highest exposure and weight was reduced

(S15.6%) at the two highest exposures.  The control fish at the end of  the

study averaged 72.6 mg in wet  weight which is low for fathead minnows of this

age in a toxicity test.  Based upon growth, the chronic limits were 1,97C  *:: i

-------
                                                                          DRAFT
                                                                        9/22/93

3,110 /jg/L.  The  chronic  value  is  2,475  pg/L.   Division  of  the  companion  acute

value of  17,000 /jg/L  by this  value results  in  an  acute-chronic  ratio  of 6.869.

      LeBlanc  (1984)  published  an  early  life-stage  study in which  fathead

minnows were exposed  to 750,  1,500,  3,200,  7,400, and  15,000 A/g/L  2,4-DMP.   No

fish survived  at  15,000 pg/L, and  only 12 percent survived  at 7,400 pg/L.

Length and weight were significantly less than controls  at  7,400 and  3,200

Hg/L.  Based upon growth, the chronic limits were 1,500  and 3,200  ^g/L.   The

chronic value  is  2,200 A/g/L.  No corresponding acute value  is available to

determine an acute-chronic ratio.

      Fathead  minnows were exposed to 2,4-DMP  in a  third 32-day life-stage

test at concentrations of 398,  605,  966, 1,573, 2,580, and  4,052 /jg/L (Russom

1993).  The study was conducted in the same laboratory as the Holcombe  et al.

(1982) study,  but ten years later.   Significant negative effects were observed

for percentage of normal appearing larvae at hatch, and  in  survival at  the end

of the study at the highest exposure concentration  of 4,052 A605 i^gfL.  Wet weight and total length were

reduced 10.4%  and 4.8%, respectively, at the exposure concentration of  605

pg/L.  The mean wet weight of the  control fish was  144 mg.  Based upon  growth,

the chronic limits were 398 and 605  /^g/L.  The chronic value is 491 ^iqfL.  A

corresponding  acute value for this  test was not measured; therefore,  an acute

chronic ratio  cannot be calculated.

      The chronic toxicity of 2,4-DMP has been determined in an early

life-stage toxicity test with the  saltwater inland  silverside, Menidia

bervllina (Thursby and Berry  1987b).  Ninety percent of  the embryos exposed  to

722 pg/L diea  prior to hatch; all  hatched fish died.  Survival of fish  hatched

in 296 A
-------
                                                                         DRAFT
                                                                       9/22/93

companion acute value of 1,320 /ug/L results in an acute-chronic ratio of

6.704.

      The Final Acute-Chronic Ratio of 5.000 is the geometric mean of the

acute-chronic ratio of 2.715 for the freshwater cladoceran, Ceriodaphnia

dubia; 6.869 for the freshwater fathead minnow, Pimephales promelas; and 6.704

for the saltwater inland silverside, Menidia bervllina.  Division of the Final

Acute Value of 2,670 pg/L for freshwater species by the ratio of 5.000 results

in a Final Chronic Value of 534.0 pg/L for freshwater aquatic life.  The value

of 534.0 /jg/L is a factor of 2.3 less than the chronic value for the

life-cycle test with Ceriodaphnia dubia and is slightly greater than the

lowest chronic value of 491 pg/L reported for the fathead minnow.

      Division of the Final Acute Value of 548.8 pg/L for saltwater species by

the ratio of 5.000 results in a Final Chronic Value of 109.8 /jg/L for

saltwater aquatic life.  The value of 109.8 pg/L is a factor of 1.8 less than

the chronic value of 196.9 /^g/L determined from the early life-stage test with

inland silversides.
Toxicitv to Aquatic Plants

      Results of a test with one species of freshwater algae and 2,4-DMP is

shown in Table 4.  A four-day exposure with the alga, Scenedesmus guadricauda,

indicated that 2,4-DMP concentrations of 40,000 /jg/L and above inhibited

growth (Bringman and Kuhn 1959a,b) .  No acceptable saltwater plant data with

2,4-DMP were found in the literature.  A Final Plant Value, as defined in the

Guidelines, cannot be calculated for 2,4-DMP.
Bioaccumulation

      A study to determine the bioconcentration of 2,4-DMP with one freshwater

species is shown in Table 5.  UC radiolabelled 2,4-DMP bioconcentrated

150-fold in the whole body of the bluegill, Lepomis macrochirus (Barrows et

al. 1980; Veith et al.  1980)  (Table 5).  A BCF determined on the basis of

radiolabelling may contain some radiolabelled metabolites; therefore, the BCF

-------
                                                                         DRAFT
                                                                       9/22/93

of 150 may be greater than that for parent 2,4-DMP.  2,4-DMP has a measured

partition coefficient (log n-octanol/water) of 2.42, and the BCF of 150

appears to be a reasonable estimate when compared to other chemicals (Veith et

al. 1980).

      No U.S. FDA action level or other maximum acceptable concentration in

tissue, as defined in the Guidelines, is available for 2,4-DMP.  Therefore, no

Final Residue Value can be calculated.
Other Data

      The incipient inhibition concentration for the bacterium, Escherichia

coli, was in excess of 100,000 pg/L (Bringman and Kuhn 1959a) (Table 6).

Exposure of the alga, Chlorella pyrenoidosa, to 100,000 pg/L for 72 hr

resulted in a 52 percent reduction of chlorophyll a (Huang and Gloyna

1967,1968).  A 28-hr exposure of the protozoan, Microregma heterostoma,

produced an incipient inhibition concentration of 70,000 pg/L (Bringman and

Kuhn 1959b), while a 60-hr EC50 of 130,510 pg/L (based on cell number) was

obtained with the protozoan, Tetrahvmena pyriformis (Schultz and Riggin 1985).

      Spehar (1987) and Norberg-King (1987) reported 48-hr LCSOs ranging from

3,100 /jg/L to 6,300 pg/L for Ceriodaphnia dubia in eight separate tests in

which daphnids were fed.  Bringman and Kuhn (1959a,b)  reported immobilization

of Daphnia maqna at 24,000 pg/L.

      Rainbow trout, Oncorhvnchus mvkiss, were exposed to acutely lethal

concentrations of 2,4-dimethylphenol to determine the symptomology of

poisoning (Bradbury et al. 1989).  At an exposure concentration of 9,040 pg/L,

the trout had a mean survival time of 6 hr.  They exhibited a significant

increase from pre-exposure measurements in cough frequency, and significant

decreases in gill oxygen uptake efficiency, total blood carbon dioxide

(arterial) and hematocrit.  These responses were consistent with a toxic mode

of action referred to as type- II (polar) narcosis.  The mean LC50 for fathead

minnows after 8 days was 13,500 pg/L (Phipps et al. 1981).

      The number of sporophytes was reduced in brown kelp, Laminaria

-------
                                                                         DRAFT
                                                                       9/22/93
saccharina, exposed for two days to 12,000 pg/L of 2,4-DMP in two tests which
began with either five- or seven-day-old plants (Thursby and Steele 1987;
Table 6).  Reproduction of kelp in 7,200 pg/L was not reduced.

Unused Data
      A screening study by Applegate et al. (1957) was not used because not
enough fish were tested per concentration.  High control mortalities occurred
in some tests reported by Thursby and Berry (1987a,b), and these results were
not included in the data tables.  2,4-DMP toxicity was reported in cell
cultures only by Babich and Borenfreund (1987).  Methods were not adequately
described in some studies (e.g., Curtis et al. 1982; Grushko et al. 1975).
Data were not used when 2,4-DMP was a component in a mixture  (e.g., Giddings
and Franco 1985; Swartz et al. 1985) or effluent (Horning et al. 1984;
Pickering 1983).  Studies were not used if the exposure duration was not
specified (e.g., Blum and Speece 1991).
      Reports of 2,4-DMP toxicity were not used when the data had been
compiled from other sources (e.g., Alexander et al. 1983; Enslein 1987; Hall
and Kier 1984a,b; Kenaga 1982; Sabljic 1987; Schultz et al. 1986; Veith and
Broderius 1987).  Similarly, reviews on bioconcentration (Davies and Dobbs
1984) and taste or odor (Persson 1984) were not used.
Summary
      The acute toxicity of 2,4-DMP has been determined for 12 species of
freshwater animals.  Acute values ranged between 3,340 pg/L and
67,600 /jg/L.  Of the eight invertebrate and four fish species tested, two
cladocerans, Ceriodaphnia dubia and Daphnia maqna, were the most sensitive.
Acute values for freshwater fish ranged from 6,300 pg/L to 19,300 fjg/L. The
bluegill, Lepomis macrochirus, was the most sensitive freshwater species.
      The chronic value for Ceriodaphnia dubia was 1,230 pg/L.  In three tests
with the fathead minnow, Pimephales promelas, chronic values of 2,475, 2,200
and 491 ftg/L were obtained.  Acute-chronic ratios were 2.715 and 6.869 for

-------
                                                                         DRAFT
                                                                       9/22/93



Ceriodaphnia and Pimephales, respectively.


      The acute toxicity of 2,4-DMP has been determined for nine species of


saltwater animals.  Acute values ranged from 1,320 /ug/L for juvenile inland


silversides, Menidia bervllina, to 55,900 /jg/L for archiannelid worms,


Dinophilus gyrociliatus.  Of the six invertebrate and three fish species


tested, no taxonomic group appeared particularly sensitive.


      Chronic toxicity data for saltwater organisms are available from an


early life-stage test with the inland silverside, Menidia beryllina.  Survival


of hatched fish was reduced in 296 /^g/L of 2,4-DMP.  No effects on survival or


growth were observed at 131 ^g/L.  The acute-chronic ratio for this species is


6.704.


      Limited plant data indicate that concentrations of 40,000 /ug/L or more


result in reduced growth of freshwater algae.  No acceptable saltwater plant


data were found in the literature.


      One test showed that the BCF for 2,4-DMP was 150 based on data for the


bluegill, Lepomis macrochirus.  No acceptable saltwater BCFs were found in the


literature.


      The freshwater Final Acute Value and Final Chronic Value for 2,4-DMP are


2,670 and 534 /jg/L, respectively.  The value of 534 pg/L is slightly greater


than the lowest chronic value of 491 pg/L reported for the fathead minnow,


indicating that this species might not be adequately protected if ambient


water concentrations exceed this concentration for long periods of time.  The


saltwater Final Acute Value and Chronic Value are 548.8 and 1*09.8 pgfL,


respectively.  Chronic adverse effects to the only saltwater species exposed


to 2,4-DMP occurred at concentrations that are higher than the Final Chronic


Value which should be protective of saltwater species.
National Criteria


      The procedures described in the  "Guidelines for Deriving Numerical


National Water Quality Criteria for the Protection of Aquatic Organisms and
    e*

Their Uses" indicate that, except possibly where a locally  important  species

-------
                                                                         DRAFT
                                                                       9/22/93

 is very  sensitive,  freshwater  aquatic organisms and their uses should not be

 affected unacceptably  if the four-day average concentration of 2,4-DMP does

 not exceed  530 A/g/L more than  once every three years on the average and  if the

 one-hour average concentration does not exceed 1,300 ^g/L more than once every

 three years on the  average.

      The procedures described in the "Guidelines for Deriving Numerical

 National Water Quality Criteria for the Protection of Aquatic Organisms  and

 Their Uses" indicate that, except possibly where a locally important species

 is very  sensitive,  saltwater aquatic organisms and their uses should not be

 affected unacceptably  if the four-day average concentration of 2,4-DMP does

 not exceed  110 ljg/l> more than  once every three years on the average and  if the

 one-hour average concentration does not exceed 270 ^g/L more than once every

 three years on the  average.



 Implementation

      As discussed  in  the Water Quality Standards Regulation (U.S. EPA 1983a)

 and the  Foreword to this document, a water quality criterion for aquatic life

 has regulatory impact  only when it has been adopted in a state water quality

 standard.  Such a standard specifies a criterion for a pollutant that is

 consistent with a particular designated use.  With the concurrence of the U.S.

EPA,  states designate  one or more uses for each body of water or segment

 thereof and adopt criteria that are consistent with the use(s) (U.S. EPA

 1983b, 1987).  Water quality criteria adopted in state water quality standards

 could have the same numerical  values as criteria developed under Section 304,

of the Clean Water Act.  However, in many situations states might want to

 adjust water quality criteria  developed under Section 304 to reflect local

 environmental conditions and human exposure patterns.  Alternatively, states

may use different data and assumptions than EPA in deriving numeric criteria

 that are scientifically defensible and protective of designated uses.  State

water quality standards include both numeric a'nd narrative criteria.  A state

may adopt a numeric criterion  within its water quality standards and apply it
                                      10

-------
                                                                         DRAFT
                                                                       9/22/93

either state-wide to all waters designated for the use the criterion is

designed to protect or to a specific site.  A state may use an indicator

parameter or the national criterion, supplemented with other relevant

information, to interpret its narrative criteria within its water quality

standards when developing NPDES effluent limitations under 40 CFR

122.44(d)(1)(vi).2

      Site-specific criteria may include not only site-specific criterion

concentrations (U.S. EPA 1983b), but also site-specific, and possibly

pollutant-specific, durations of averaging periods and frequencies of allowed

excursions (U.S. EPA 1991).  The averaging periods of "one hour" and "four

days" were selected by the U.S. EPA on the basis of data concerning how

rapidly some aquatic species react to increases in the concentrations of some

aquatic pollutants, and "three years" is the Agency's best scientific judgment

of the average amount of time aquatic ecosystems should be provided between

excursions (Stephan et al. 1985; U.S. EPA 1991).  However, various species and

ecosystems react and recover at greatly differing rates.  Therefore, if

adequate justification is provided, site-specific and/or pollutant-specific

concentrations, durations, and frequencies may be higher or lower than those

given in national water quality criteria for aquatic life.

      Use of criteria, which have been adopted in state water quality

standards,  for developing water quality-based permit limits and for designing

waste treatment facilities requires selection of an appropriate wasteload

allocation model.   Although dynamic models are preferred for the application

of these criteria (U.S. EPA 1991), limited data or other considerations might

require the use of a steady-state model (U.S. EPA 1986).

      Guidance on mixing zones and the design of monitoring programs is also

available (U.S. EPA 1987, 1991).
                                      11

-------
                         £
                         1
                                  c.
                                  'fi
     c.
     I
                c
                •c

                                                  ii
     g
     *3
•a
                8
         8
t
S

i5
        I
     s
     uT
S
uT
S
u."
S
u."
S
tu'
                2 5
                2 .S
                  ~
2 2
a"
                     II
G
^ T> ^ 'C1 -T _?-•
_C2 03
S
Snail (adult;
Aplexa hyp
-r to
S!
Cladoceran
Ceriodaphn
.C -C .£ J= C3
§1
Cladoceran
Daphnia m;
rf
Sa
Cladoceran
Daphnia m:
!(
Cladoceran
Daphnia m:
•i'i
fl. J*
& s
Glass shrim
Palaemonel

.«
c
3
?l
Crayfish (a<
Orconectes
C .—

•s 1
•* -K
«'5
Midge (3rd
Tanytarsus
'S «
y 'J^
ll
3 3
o _e
Rainbow lr<
Oncoihyncl
                                      12

-------
                                                                             03
                                                                  1
                                                       f «
                                                        fc« f*«.
                                                        = 00
                — —    C/i
Ol
                                         s
                                         u."
                                                                             OS
        = 3
               LL
                        •3  S
•5 8
 >
                                J  g
                                03 J
                       a
      c


S    I

£ ^  £

E  g.1
a  i  S
      2
    • U
Ea
•  § .
 'O» ,
                                                                                        •o -^  -
                                                                                         ° = a
I-
<  .
•g ^
S 3
i I
o €.
                                                      13

-------
                      1,8
1,8
                                 £2       (52
                                            S
                                            uT
I
3
C
W

3
Sea urchin
(embryo-larva),
Arbacia punctulata
Sheepshead minno'
(juvenile),
Cvprinodon varieg
S
C3
V)
Inland silversidc
(juvenile),
Menidia bervllina
Winter flounder
(larva),
Pseudopleuronecte





11
u. _.
1 1
U O
!•§
• S = static; R =
b Purity of the test
                                                                    1
                                                                    II
                                                                    s
                                                               14

-------
                        g



                        3.
                   g
                   8
                        o
                        -9
U
                O
            u
_,
•5
C3
G G
5 •£
§ 1
i •=
_ o
u o
i
i
'§
•o
u
£
^5
U-
J
9UIOJ
C
v;
"n
j^
c
-j
c

ix

1
c
c

•o
o

a.
ca
2

v
_g
c

(X

!
G
's
•a
1

11,
ra
£
C
_5
«
JS


CL
                                     S £
                                    all

-------
£
c

6
> 3

« "5
J>


I
         ^ c
         •J 0!

         = "c


         1'S
         U
               3 I

              i!
                    s.i
                    U. O.
                          £  Z
                          j>  S
                         "i «
                          S c
                         .2 M
                                  16

-------
       s'l
w  «

•s -
2  a
w *>
       c. 3.
       CO <
                                            8
o











."H
1
c





•-n
3
«
Si
'u
>
3
3
0
•c
|

Jj





*T
2
4>
J>
*4J
O
0









.—
i
.-
"c
2
t3
>-
X
"5
3
s


11
II
"s
•5
U3
3
CO
« 3
OD >-
•a c
2«2
3
|!
13 5
o *-^
— , CO
11
J3 n
U S
                                                                 £  «
                                                                               If

                                                                               .S O
                                                                                 C
                                                                                 
-------
     « o -fa
    ,a i '—
                                                                     8
    »

     3
     e,
                              [2

                              S
                              c.
                              en

                              SI
                               <
                               ft
        I'S
        u u


o
."H
1
c
•F
<
1

"o
£
>-
Bl
trt
^
*.£
c
c
c
5


1>
•o
c
3
"
V
C
?
v;
-j
1

p
c
-a
I



K
i
«
a merit
c'
a
3
(3
-J


3
c
c
c
1
V)
.. 3
SI
• - a
c >
•0 g
«) O
S -a
i!

-------
II
  <-> "o
3  §
S J3
•3  3 a
g.3 3
«  <

D <
                                           a.
                                           o
                                           3
                                           |

                                           U
                                           S
                                                0
                                                    1
                                                                   a,   2

                                                                  =   c
                                                                           *2   CO
                                       -
                       S 2 2
                       QiU.ll.
                                           .
                                           U
U

1
E
                                              19

-------
I



1

9
•T
»»l

 >-.
        —  C
        c  o
        •J  *—
£2
o:
UJ
                                s
                               &
                       UJ
                                o
         < in
                                            •c
                                            (2
                                                     20

-------
             CO >
  &.
12

11
k* ti*
                        o
.-= 5


J I
ca -J
                                c

                               i
                               •si
                               M Cl.
                               c ^=
                               •2 c

                               I a
                               £ o
                               « "5


                               If
                             •3   o
                              0 2

                              "
                             S 5
                               21

-------
                                                 •3,
                                                 •e
                                                 o
                                                              2

                                                              £?
                                                              •u
                                                              •e
                                                              o
                                                                    2
                                                -e
                                                o
                                                                           2
                                                €

                                                z
                                                                                 2
2

S?

•I
o
       s a

       6
g
1
2
a
C. .C


11
  It
tg =  °
                                      1
                            o ^
                                     I  a
                                                                                  o

                                                                                  21
VO


.2
                        II
                      ca ui
                            < U
§
jO
>
c
03
c
1i
a E
§ >
g-g
Is
C
i
—
j-
1
ca w
II
II
y^ x-"v
•^ 15

V


1 "§
1 '5
u u
j: .a
CM "5
V
I'l
t- C
•U C3
= 1
I'S
o u
Cl
.c n
•a- 3
V "°
il
u n
0 -0
•§ -8
a fe
u u
js a
J* 3
V "^
II
11
u u
J3 .2
cs s
v?
il
1!
CJ U
•*- .2
cs 3
iS'
II
« a
o "S
1'i
CJ U
                                                   22

-------
.1°
CO
        S
        oa
 2
CO
                        c.
                        c,

                       "JE
                       a.
                                                             I
                c a-
1
•S  g  S  f 2 §
c *  s  f x -e
        c 8 -
S3 J3
«§?.

!§•
                c



             W £^* O
        g-5 ^
        5-S5 J
        O  o J3
                               C  c
                               Sj?
                                                                «
                                                                  •j
                                                                  ~Sb
                                                             € r.g
                                                                2-0 n
                                                                iU  ••
                                                             o  3 r--
                                                             cx. 3 ^>
                                                             C/3  *O «
                                                                  -o
                                                                  .2
                                                                          = 8
^_
^
s
V
c
2
•u
'X

u
^4^
C-3
3
"«
'5
js
w
•o
'?
CJ
J2
S
V
c

u
y
ra
U
— r
(.^
s|
c
OJ

c
«8
"5
•g
Q
3
0
•-
j5
O
C
ctf
«
15
>
s
3
J=
C
>•
*s
c
o
C
^
                                      'i jj
                                              s  i
                                              O  C
                                              o."E.

                                              "S 2 .2
                                                                        I
                                                                       ca
                          23

-------
                                                                         DRAFT
                                                                       9/22/93
                                  REFERENCES



Alexander, H.C., K.M. Bodner and M.A. Mayes. 1983. Evaluation of the OECD

"Fish prolonged toxicity study at least 14 days." Chemosphere 12:415-423.


Applegate, V.C., J.H. Howell, A.E. Hall, Jr. and M.A. Smith. 1957. Toxicity of

4,346 chemicals to larval lampreys and fishes. 'Special Scientific Report -

Fisheries No. 207. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, D.C.


Babich, H. and E. Borenfreund. 1987. In vitro cytotoxicity of organic

pollutants to bluegill sunfish (BF-2) cells. Environ. Res. 42:229-237.


Barrows, M.E., S.R. Petrocelli, K.J. Macek and J.J. Carroll. 1980.

Bioconcentration and elimination of  selected water pollutants by bluegill

sunfish  (Lepomis macrochirus). In: Dynamics, exposure and hazard assessment of

toxic chemicals. Hague, R.  (Ed.). Ann Arbor Science Publ., Inc., Ann Arbor,

MI. pp. 379-392.


Bennet, H. 1974. Concise chemical and technical dictionary. 3rd ed. Chemical

Publishing Co., Inc., New York, NY.


Blum, D.J.W. and R.E. Speece.  1991.  A database  of chemical toxicity  to

environmental bacteria and  its use  in interspecies comparisons and

correlations.  J. Water Pollut. Control Fed.  63:198-207.


Bradbury, S.P., T.R. Henry,  G.J.  Neimi, R.W.  Carlson  and  V.M.  Snarski.   1989.

Use of  respiratory-cardiovascular responses of  rainbow  trout  (Salmo qairdneri.)

in identifying  acute toxicity  syndromes  in fish:   Part  3.   Polar  narcotics.

Environ.  Toxicol. Chem.  8:247-261.
 Bringman,  G.  and R.  Kuhn.  1959a.  Comparative water - toxicological
                                       24

-------
                                                                         DRAFT
                                                                       9/22/93


investigations on bacteria, algae, and Daphnia. Gesundh. Ingen. 80:115-120.



Bringman, G. and R. Kuhn.  1959b. Water - toxicological  investigations with

protozoa as test organisms. Gesundh. Ingen. 8:239-242.



Buccafusco, R.J., S.J. Ells and G.A. LeBlanc. 1981. Acute toxicity of priority

pollutants to bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus^. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol.

26:446-452.



Buikema, A.L., Jr., M.J. McGinniss and J. Cairns, Jr. 1979. Phenolics in

aquatic ecosystems: A selected review of recent literature. Marine Environ.

Res. 2:87-181.



Callahan, M.A., M.W. Slimak, N.W. Gabel, I.P. May, C.F. Fowler, J.R. Freed, P.

Jennings, R.L. Durfee, F.C. Whitmore, B. Maestri, W.R. Mabey, B.R. Holt and C.

Gould. 1979. Water-related environmental fate of 129 priority pollutants. Vol.

II. EPA-440/4-79-029b. National Technical Information Service, Springfield,

VA. pp. 91-1 to 91-9.



Curtis, C., A. Lima, S.J. Lozano and G.D. Veith. 1982. Evaluation of a

bacterial bioluminescence bioassay as a method for predicting acute toxicity

of organic chemicals to fish. In: Aquatic toxicology and hazard assessment.

Pearson, J.G., R.B. Foster and W.E. Bishop (Eds.). ASTM STP 766. American

Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA. pp. 170-178.



Davies, R.P. and A.J. Dobbs. 1984. The prediction of bioconcentration in fish.

Water Res.  18:1253-1262.
Enslein, K., T.M. Tuzzeo, H.H. Borgstedt, B.W. Blake and J.B. Hart.  1987.

Prediction of rat oral LD50 from Daphnia maqna LC50 and chemical structure.

In:  QSAR in environmental toxicology-II.  Kaiser, K.L.E.  (Ed.). D. Re'idel


                                      25

-------
                                                                         DRAFT
                                                                       9/22/93
Publ. Co., Dordrecht, Holland.  pp. 91-106.


Giddings, J.M. and P.J. Franco. 1985. Calibration of laboratory bioassays with

results from microcosms and ponds. In: Validation and predictability of

laboratory methods for assessing the fate and effects of contaminants in

aquatic ecosystems. Boyle, T.P. (Ed.). ASTM STP 865. American Society for

Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA. pp. 104-119.


Gruse, W.A. and D.R. Stevens. 1942. The chemical technology of petroleum.

McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc., New York, NY.



Grushko, Y.M., O.M. Kozhova and D.I. Stom. 1975. Waste effluent of kraft pulp

mills and its toxicity. Hydrobiol. J. 11:93-99.


Hall, L.H. and L.B. Kier. 1984a. A molecular connectivity study of phenols and

their toxicity to fish. In: QSAR in design of bioactive compounds: Proceedings

of the first telesymposium on medicinal chemistry. Kuchar, M. (Ed.). J.R.

Prous Publishing Co., Barcelona, Spain, pp. 53-59.



Hall, L.H. and L.B. Kier. 1984b. Molecular connectivity of phenols and their

toxicity to fish. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 32:354-362.


Hoak, R.D. 1957. The causes of tastes and odors in drinking water. In: Proc.

llth Ind. Waste Conf., Purdue Univ., Eng. Bull. Series 91:229-241.



Holcombe, G. and G. Phipps. 1987. U.S. EPA, Duluth, MN. (Memorandum to N.

Thomas, C. Stephan, B. Spehar and S. Broderius, U.S. EPA, Duluth, MN),

March 2.
Holcombe, G.W.,  G.L.  Phipps  and  J.T.  Fiandt.  1982. Effects of phenol,

2,4-dimethylphenol,  2,4-dichlorophenol,  and pentachlorophenol on embryo,
                                       26

-------
                                                                         DRAFT
                                                                       9/22/93
larval,  and early  -  juvenile  fathead minnows  (Pimephales promelas1) . Arch.

Environ. Contam. Toxicol.  11:73-78.



Horning, W.B., E.L.  Robinson  and A.C. Petrasek, Jr. 1984. Reduction in

toxicity of organic  priority  pollutants by pilot-scale conventional wastewater

treatment process. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 13:191-196.



Huang, J.C. and E.F. Gloyna.  1967. Effects of toxic organics on photosynthetic

reoxygenation. Center for  Research of Water Resources, Texas University,

Austin, TX. PB216-749. Available from National Technical Information Service,

Springfield, VA.



Huang, J.C. and E.F. Gloyna.  1968. Effect of organic compounds on

photosynthetic oxygenation. I. Chlorophyll destruction and suppression of

photosynthetic oxygen production. Water Res. 2:347-366.



Jordan, T.E. 1954. Vapor pressure of organic compounds. Interscience

Publishers, Inc., New York, NY.



Kenaga, E.E. 1982. Predictability of chronic toxicity from acute toxicity of

chemicals in fish and aquatic invertebrates. Environ.  Toxicol. Chem.

1:347-358.



Kirk, R.E.  and D.F. Othmer (Eds.). 1964. Kirk-Othmer encyclopedia of chemical

technology. 2nd ed. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York,  NY.



LeBlanc, G.A.  1980. Acute toxicity of priority pollutants to water flea

(Daphnia maqna). Bull. Environ. Contam.  Toxicol. 24:684-691.
LeBlanc, G.A. 1984. Comparative structure-toxicity relationships between acute

and chronic effects to aquatic organisms. In: QSAR in environmental


                                      27

-------
                                                                         DRAFT
                                                                       9/22/93
toxicology. Kaiser, K.L. (Ed.)- D. Reidel Publ.  Co.,  Dordrecht,  pp.  235-260.



Lowry, H.H. 1963. Chemistry of coal utilization. John Wiley and Sons, Inc.,

New York, NY.


Norberg-King, T.J. 1987. Environmental Research Laboratory-Duluth, U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency, Duluth, MN. (Memorandum to C. Stephan,

Environmental Research Laboratory-Duluth, D. Call and L. Brooke, University of

Wisconsin-Superior, Superior, WI), August 31.



Persson, P.E. 1984. Uptake and release of environmentally occurring odorous

compounds by fish. A  review. Water Res.  18:1263-1271.



Phipps,  G.L., G.W. Holcombe and J.T. Fiandt. 1981. Acute toxicity of phenol

and substituted  phenols to the fathead minnow.  Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol.

26:585-593.


Pickering, Q.H.  1983. Chronic  toxicity to fathead minnow Pimephales promelas

of wastewater from a  conventional wastewater treatment  system receiving

organic  priority pollutants. Environ. Pollut.  (Series A) 31:105-117.



Randall, T.L. and P.V.  Knopp.  1980.  Detoxification of specific  organic

substances by wet oxidation. J.  Water Pollut.  Control Fed.  52:2117-2130.



Redmond, M.S. and K.J.  Scott.  1987.  Acute toxicity tests with dimethylphenol.

 (Memorandum  to  D.J.  Hansen,  U.S.  EPA,  Narragansett,  RI), April  17.



Richards,  D.J.  and W.K. Shieh. 1986. Biological fate of organic priority

pollutants in the aquatic environment.  Water Res.  20:1077-1090.



 Rodd, E.H. 1952. Chemistry of carbon compounds. Elsevier Publishing Co., New


                                       28

-------
                                                                          DRAFT
                                                                        9/22/93


 York,  NY.



 Rudolfs, W.  1953.  Industrial wastes,  their disposal  and treatment.  Reinhold

 Publishing Corp.,  New York,  NY.



 Russom, C.   1993.   U.S.  EPA, Duluth,  MN (Memorandum  to  R.  Spehar,  U.S.  EPA,

 Duluth, MN.   June  21.)



 Sabjlic, A.   1987.   The  prediction of fish bioconcentration  factors of  organic

 pollutants  from the molecular connectivity model.  Z. gesam'te  Hyg.  33:493-496.



 Sabourin,  T.D.  1987.  Battelle Columbus  Division, Columbus, OH.  (Memorandum to

 D.J. Call, University of Wisconsin-Superior, Superior,  WI),  July 29.



 Schultz, T.W.,  G.W.  Ho'lcombe and G.L. Phipps. 1986.  Relationships of

 quantitative  structure-activity to comparative toxicity of selected phenols  in

 the Pimephales  promelas  and  Tetrahvmena pyriformis test systems. Ecotoxicol.

 Environ. Saf. 12:146-153.



 Schultz, T.W. and G.W. Riggin. 1985.  Predictive correlations for the toxicity

 of alkyl- and halogen-substituted  phenols. Toxicol.  Letters  25:47-54.



 Shackelford, W.M. and L.H. Keith.  1976. Frequency of organic compounds  in

water.  EPA 600/4-76-062.  National  Technical Information Service, Springfield,

VA.



 Sober,  H.A. 1970. Handbook of biochemistry. Selected data for microbiology.

 2nd ed. CRC Press, Cleveland, OH.
Spehar, R.L. 1987. U.S. EPA, Duluth, MN. (Memorandum to C. Stephan, U.S. EPA,

Duluth, MN), June 24.
                                      29

-------
                                                                         DRAFT
                                                                       9/22/93


Stephan, C.E., D.I. Mount, D.J. Hansen, J.FK Gentile,  G.A.  Chapman and W.A.

Brungs. 1985. Guidelines for deriving numerical national water quality

criteria for the protection of aquatic organisms and their uses. PB85-227049.

National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA.



Swartz, R.C., D.W. Schults, G.R. Ditsworth, W.A. DeBen and F.A. Cole. 1985.

Sediment toxicity, contamination, and macrobenthic communities near a large

sewage outfall. In: Validation and predictability of laboratory methods for

assessing the fate and effects of contaminants in aquatic ecosystems. Boyle,

T.P. (Ed.). ASTM STP 865. American Society for Testing and Materials,

Philadelphia, PA. pp. 152-175.



Thursby, G.B. and W.J. Berry. 1987a. University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI.

Acute toxicity of 2,4-dimethylphenol to saltwater animals. (Memorandum to  D.J.

Hansen, U.S. EPA, Narragansett, RI), August 19.



Thursby, G.B. and W.J. Berry. 1987b. University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI.

Chronic toxicity of 2,4-dimethylphenol to Menidia bervllina.  (Memorandum to

D.J. Hansen, U.S. EPA, Narragansett, RI), August 19.

                                          *

Thursby, G.B. and R.L. Steele.  1987. University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI.

Toxicity of 2,4-dimethylphenol  to saltwater plants. (Memorandum to D.J.

Hansen, U.S. EPA, Narragansett, RI), August 19.



U.S. EPA.  1975. Identification  of organic compounds in  effluents from

industrial sources. Prepared  for U.S.  Environ.  Prot. Agency,  Versar, Inc.,

Springfield, VA.



U.S. EPA.  1976. The  industrial  organic chemicals  industry, Part I. Prepared

for U.S. Environ.  Prot.  Agency.  Res.  Triangle Inst., Monsanto Research Corp.,

Dayton, OH.


                                       30

-------
                                                                          DRAFT
                                                                       9/22/93
U.S. EPA.  1980.  Ambient water  quality  criteria for 2,4-dimethylphenol.

PB81-117558.  National  Technical  Information Service, Springfield, VA.



U.S. EPA.  1983a. Water quality standards regulation. Federal Regist.

48:51400-51413.  November  8.



U.S. EPA.  1983b. Water quality standards handbook. Office of Water Regulations

and Standards, Washington, D.C.



U.S. EPA.  1985.  Appendix  B - Response  to public comments.on "Guidelines  for

deriving numerical national water quality criteria for the protection of

aquatic organisms and  their uses." Federal Regist. 50:30793-30796. July  29.



U.S. EPA.  1986.  Chapter I - Stream design flow for steady-state modeling.  In:

Book VI -  Design conditions. In: Technical guidance manual for performing

waste load allocation. Office  of Water, Washington, D.C. August.



U.S. EPA.  1987. Permit writers guide to water quality-based permitting for

toxic pollutants. EPA-440/4-87-005. Office of Water, Washington, D.C.



U.S. EPA.  1991. Technical support document for water quality-based toxics

control. Office of Water, Washington, DC, March.  EPA-505/2-90-001 or PB-

127415. National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA.



Veith,  G.D. and S.J. Broderius.  1987.  Structure-toxicity relationships for

industrial chemicals causing type (II) narcosis syndrome.  In:  QSAR in

environmental toxicology - II.  Kaiser, K.L.E. (Ed.).  D. Reidel Publ. Co.,

Dordrecht, Holland.  pp. 385-391.
Veith, G.D., K.J. Macek, S.R. Petrocelli and J. Carroll. 1980. An evaluation

of using partition coefficients and water solubility to estimate


                                      31

-------
                                                                         DRAFT
                                                                       9/22/93


bioconcentration factors for organic chemicals in fish. In: Eaton, J.G., P.R.

Parrish and A.C. Hendricks  (Eds.)- Aquatic Toxicology, ASTM STP 707. American

Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA. pp. 116-129.



Weast, R.C. 1972. Handbook  of chemistry and physics. CRC Press, Cleveland, OH.
                                       32

-------
                                -R-33-02.1-
                                                      DRAFT
                                                    9/22/93
AMBIENT AQUATIC LIFE WATER QUALITY CRITERIA FOR

                   ANILINE

         (CAS Registry Number  62-53-3)
                SEPTEMBER 1993
     U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

               OFFICE OF WATER
       OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
    HEALTH AND ECOLOGICAL CRITERIA DIVISION
               WASHINGTON, D.C.

      OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
      ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORIES
              DULUTH, MINNESOTA
          NARRAGANSETT, RHODE  ISLAND

-------

-------
                                                                         DRAFT
                                                                       9/22/93
                                    NOTICES
      This document has been reviewed by the Environmental Research
Laboratories, Duluth, MN and Narragansett, RI, Office of Research and
Development and the Health and Ecological Criteria Division, Office of Science
and Technology, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and approved for
publication.

      Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute
endorsement or recommendation for use.

      This document is available to the public through the National Technical
Information Service (NTIS), 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA  22161.
                                      ii

-------
                                                                         DRAFT
                                                                       9/22/93
                                   FOREWORD
      Section 304(a) (1) of the Clean Water Act of 1977 (P.L. 95-217) requires
the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to publish water
quality criteria- that accurately reflect the latest scientific knowledge on
the kind and extent of all identifiable effects on health and welfare that
might be expected from the presence of pollutants in any body of water,
including ground water.  This document is a revision of proposed criteria
based upon consideration of comments received from other federal agencies,
state agencies, special interest groups, and individual scientists.  Criteria
contained in this document replace any previously published EPA aquatic life
criteria for the same pollutant(s).

      The term "water quality criteria" is used in two sections of the Clean
Water Act, section 304(a)(l) and section 303(c)(2).  The term has a different
program impact in each section.  In section 304, the term represents a non-
regulatory, scientific assessment of ecological effects.  Criteria presented
in this document are such scientific assessments.  If water quality criteria
associated with specific stream uses are adopted by a state as water quality
standards under section 303, they represent maximum acceptable pollutant
concentrations in ambient waters within that state that are enforced through
issuance of discharge limitations in NPDES permits.  Water quality criteria
adopted in state water quality standards could have the same numerical values
as criteria developed under section 304.  However, in many situations states
might want to modify water quality criteria developed under section 304 to
reflect local environmental conditions and human exposure patterns.         {
Alternatively, states may use different data and assumptions than EPA in
deriving numeric criteria that are scientifically defensible and protective of
designated uses.  It is not until their adoption as part of state water
quality standards that criteria become regulatory.  Guidelines to assist the
states and Indian tribes in modifying the criteria presented in this document
are contained in the Water Quality Standards Handbook (December 1983).  This
handbook and additional guidance on the development of water quality standards
and other water-related programs of this Agency have been developed by the
Office of Water.

      This document, if finalized, would be guidance only.  It would not
establish or affect legal rights or obligations.  It would not establish a
binding norm and would not be finally determinative of the issues addressed.
Agency decisions in any particular situation will be made by applying the
Clean Water Act and EPA regulations on the basis of specific facts presented
and scientific information then available.
                                    Tudor T. Davies
                                    Director
                                    Office of Science and Technology
                                      iii

-------
                                                                         DRAFT
                                                                       9/22/93
                               ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Larry T. Brooke
(freshwater author)
University of Wisconsin-Superior
Superior, Wisconsin
David J. Hansen
(saltwater author)
Environmental Research Laboratory
Narragansett, Rhode Island
Robert L. Spehar
(document coordinator)
Environmental Research Laboratory
Duluth, Minnesota
Suzanne M. Lussier
(saltwater coordinator)
Environmental Research Laboratory
Narragansett, Rhode Island
                                       iv

-------
                                    CONTENTS
                                                                         DRAFT
                                                                       9/22/93
                                                                          Page
Notices  ............  .  ...............
Foreword  .  .' . " ................  .........
Acknowledgments  .............................   iv
Tables   ............  ....  .................   vi

Introduction  ..............................    l
Acute toxicity to Aquatic Animals  ......... ...........    2
Chronic  Toxicity to Aquatic Animals  ...................    4
Toxicity to  Aquatic Plants  .......................    6
Bioaccumulation  .............................    7
Other Data   ...............................    7
Unused Data  ...........  .......  .............   XO
Summary  .................................
National Criteria ............................   13
Implementation   .............................   13
References
                                                                            33

-------
                                                                         DRAFT
                                                                       9/22/93
1.

2.

3.



4.

5.
                                TABLES

                                                                   Page

Acute Toxicity of Aniline to Aquatic Animals.	  15

Chronic Toxicity of Aniline to Aquatic Animals	..  19

Ranked Genus Mean Acute Values with Species Mean Acute-Chronic
  Ratios.
21
Toxicity of Aniline to Aquatic Plants.	  24

Other Data on Effects of Aniline on Aquatic Organisms.	  26
                                      vi

-------
                                                                         DRAFT
                                                                       9/22/93
introduction
      Aniline (aminobenzene,  benzenamine, phenylaraine) is the simplest of the
aromatic amines (C^KSKH2).   It  occurs  naturally in  coal-tars  (Shelford  1917)
and is manufactured by the catalytic reduction of nitrobenzene, amination of
chlorobenzene and ammonolysis of phenol.
      The major users of aniline are the polymer,  rubber, agricultural and dye
industries.  Demand for aniline by the dye industry was high prior to the
1970's but decreased markedly in the United States thereafter because of the
increased use of synthetic fabrics.  Aniline  is used today primarily by the
polymer industry to manufacture products such as polyurethanes.  The rubber
industry uses large amounts of aniline to manufacture antioxidants,
antidegradants and vulcanization accelerators.  The pharmaceutical industry
uses aniline in the manufacture of sulfa drugs and other products.  Important
agricultural uses for aniline derivatives include herbicides,  fungicides,
insecticides, repellents and defoliants.  Aniline has also been used  as an  •
antiknock compound in gasolines  (Kirk-Othmer  1982).
      Aniline is soluble in water up to  34,000,000 A/9/L  (Verschueren  1977).
The Iog10 of the octanol-water partition  coefficient  for  aniline is 0.90  (Chiou
1985a).  Through direct disposal, such  as industrial  discharges and non-point
sources associated•with agricultural uses,  it enters  the aquatic environment.
It is removed  from the  aquatic  environment  by several mechanisms.  The major
pathway of  removal from water is by  microbial decomposition (Lyons et al.
1984, 1985).   Several minor  pathways have been identified  including
evaporation, binding to humic substances and autoxidation.
      Additions  to the  aniline molecule of  certain functional groups  have been
found to  increase toxicity (Brooke et  al.  1984; Geiger  et  al. 1986,  1987).
Tests with the fathead  minnow fPimephales promelas)  have demonstrated that
substitutions with halogens, (chlorine, fluorine, and bromine) increased
toxicity.   The addition of alkyl groups also increased toxicity;  the toxicity
 increases in proportion to the increase in chain length.  Twenty-four
 substitutions were tested and all except EiEE additions of methyl and nitro

-------
                                                                         DRAFT
                                                                       9/22/93
groups increased the toxicity to the fathead minnow.
      All concentrations reported herein are expressed as aniline.  Results of
such intermediate calculations as recalculated LCSO's and Species Mean Acute
Values are given to four significant figures to prevent round-off error in
subsequent calculations, not to reflect the precision of the value.  Whenever
adequately justified, a national criterion may oe replaced by a site-specific
criterion (U.S. EPA 1983a) that may include not only site-specific
concentrations (U.S. EPA 1983b) but also site-specific frequencies of allowed
excursion (U.S. EPA 1985).
      A comprehension of the "Guidelines for Deriving Numerical National Water
Quality Criteria for the Protection of Aquatic Organisms and Their Uses"
(Stephan et al. 1985), hereinafter referred to as the Guidelines, and the
response to public comment (U.S. EPA 1985), is necessary to understand the
following text, tables, and calculations.  The latest comprehensive literature
search for information for this document was conducted in September 1992; sime
more recent information is included.
Acute toxicitv to Aquatic Animals
      The data that are available according to the Guidelines concerning the
acute toxicity of aniline are presented in Table 1.  Cladocera were the most
sensitive group of the 19 species tested.  Several species of larval midges
and embryos and larvae of the clawed toad, Xenopus laevis. were  the most
resistant to aniline in acute exposures.  Fish tended to be  in the mid-range
of sensitivity for aquatic organisms.
      Forty-eight-hour ECSOs for the cladocerans Ceriodaphnia dubia and
Daphnia maona were 44 nq/l. and  530 pg/L,  respectively.  Several  independent
exposures conducted with both species  showed consistency among the tests
(Table 1).  However, there appears to  be  a large increase  in tolerance of
aniline between cladocerans and other  aquatic species.  The  96-hr LC50 for the
next most sensitive species, a  planarian, Duaesia tiorina. was 31,600 j/g/L.
      Ninety-six-hour LCSOs for fish ranged from 10,600 to 187,000 ^g/L.   The

-------
                                                                         DRAFT
                                                                       9/22/93
rainbow trout fOncorhvncus mvkisa) was the most sensitive species of fish
tested, with 96-hr LCSOs ranging from 10,6«0 to 41,000 ftg/l>.  The bluegill
(Lepomia macrochirusl was slightly more tolerant of aniline with a 96-hr LC50
of 49,000 pg/L.  Fathead minnows, Pimephales promelas, and goldfish, Carassius
auratua. were the most tolerant of aniline of the fish species tested.
Ninety-six-hour LCSOs for tests with fathead minnows ranged from 32,000 to
134,000 pg/L.  A 96-hr LC50 for the goldfish was 187,000 /jg/L.
      Franco et al.  (1984) exposed four species of midge larvae to aniline and
found them to be the most tolerant of aniline of all species tested.  The
midge, clinotanvpus pinquis. was the most tolerant of the four species tested;
a 48-hr LC50 of 477,900 A«g/L was calculated for this species.  LCBOs for other
midge species tested by Franco et al. (1984), ranged downward to 272,100 /ng/L.
Holcombe et al. (1987) tested another species of midge (Tanvtarsus disslmilis)
and reported a 48-hr LC50 >219,000 ^g/L.
      The African clawed frog, Xenopus laevis, was relatively tolerant of  •»
aniline.  In a series of three tests, Davis et al. (1981) found that embryos
of African clawed frogs were more tolerant than the larvae.  The 96-hr LCSOs
for embryos and tailbud embryos were 550,000 and 940,000 A«g/L, respectively,
compared to 150,000 pg/L for the larvae.
      Genus Mean Acute Values (GMAVs) are ranked from most  sensitive to most
resistant for the nineteen freshwater genera tested (Table  3).  The freshwater
Final Acute Value  (FAV) of 56.97 pg/L was calculated using  the GMAVs  for the
four most sensitive  genera, Ceriodaphnia, paphnia. Duqesia, and Oncorhvnchus
which differ from one another within a factor of 251.  The  Final Acute Value
is 2.2 times less than the acute value for the most sensitive freshwater
species.
      The acute toxicity of aniline to resident North American saltwater
animals has been determined with  five species of invertebrates and  three
species of fish  (Thursby and Berry 1987a,  I987b; Redmond and Scott  1987;
Table  1).  Grass shrimp, tested as larvae, was the most sensitive' species
based on an acute  value of  610 figfL.  Crustaceans comprised the three most

-------
                                                                         DRAFT
                                                                       9/22/93
sensitive species tested; acute values ranged from 610 to 16,500 pg/L.   Acute
values for three fishes,  a mollusc and an echinoderm ranged from 17,400 to
>333,000 pg/L.  Mortalities in acute tests with mysids, grass shrimp,
sheepshead minnows and inland silversides increased during 96-hr tests.  GMAVs
are ranked from the most sensitive to the most resistant (Table 3) for the
eight saltwater genera tested.  The Final Acute Value for saltwater species is
153.4 pg/L which is four times less than the acute value for the most
sensitive saltwater species tested.
Chronic Toxicitv to Aquatic Animals
      The data that are available according to the Guidelines  concerning the
chronic toxicity of aniline are presented in Table 2,  Four chronic toxicity
tests exposing freshwater organisms to aniline have been reported.  The
cladoceran, ceriodaphnia dubia, was exposed to initial concentrations ranging
from 1.07 to 26.5 pg/L for seven days with daily renewed exposures  (Spehar  •
1987).  Survival was not significantly affected at any exposure concentration;
however, effects on young production were observed at 12.7 yg/L,  but not at
8.1 pg/L.  The chronic value,  based upon reproductive impairment, is 10.1
pg/L.  This number may be under-protective since it  is based  upon initial
measured concentrations of aniline  and did not take  into  consideration  that
the study  showed nearly 100%  loss of  aniline  from solution  in 24 hr.  A
companion  acute test was conducted  with  the chronic  study and resulted  in  a
48-hr  EC50 of 44 pg/L.  Division of this value by the  chronic value generates
an acute-chronic ratio of  4.356 for Ceriodaphnia dubia.
       Daphnia maona were exposed to aniline  for  21  days in a renewal test
 (Gersich and Milazzo  1988}.   Mean concentrations  for the exposures ranged  from
 12.7  to 168.6 pg/L for  the five concentrations  tested.   Mean total
 young/surviving adult and  mean brood size/surviving adult were not
 significantly different from the control organisms at 24.6 A/g/L  but were
 significantly different at 46.7 pg/L.  Based"upon these two reproduction
 endpoints, the chronic value  is 33.9 »g/l.  The companion acute  value  (48-hr

-------
                                                                         DRAFT
                                                                       9/22/93
EC50) used to compute an acute-chronic ratio was 170 yg/L (Gersich and Mayes,
1986).  Division of this value by the chronic value of 33.9 pg/L results in an
acute-chronic ratio of 5.015.
      A 90-da'y early life-stage test was conducted with rainbow trout (Spehar
1987).  The test was started with newly fertilized embryos.  After 56 days
(swim-up stage), wet weight was significantly reduced at concentrations of
4,000 pig/L and above.  After 90 days of exposure, an effect was not seen at
4,000 pg/L but weight was reduced at 7,800 pg/L.  Survival was reduced at only
the highest exposure concentration  (15,900 pg/L).  The chronic value  for
rainbow trout is 5,600 pg/L, based  upon growth.  Spehar  (1987) also conducted
a 96-hr acute test which resulted in an acute value of 30,000 pg/L.   Division
of the acute value by the chronic value generates an acute-chronic ratio of
5.357.
      The fathead minnow was exposed to aniline concentrations that ranged
from  316 to 2,110 pg/L  in 32-day exposures  (Russom  1993).   Percentage normal
fry  at hatch and survival at the end of the test did  not differ  significantly
from the control fish at any aniline concentrations.   Growth (weight  and
length) was significantly  (p<0.05)  reduced at aniline concentrations  of 735
pg/L and greater, but not at 422 pg/L.  Wet weight  was reduced by 13.3% and
total length by 6.4% compared  to control  fish wet weight and total length at
735  jig/I..   The chronic  value for this  test, based  upon growth,  is 557 /ig/L.
The  companion  acute test resulted in a 96-hr LC50  of 112,000 pg/L (Geiger et
al.  1990).   Division of this value by the chronic  value results in an acute-
chronic ratio  of 201.1.
       The only chronic toxicity test with aniline and saltwater species was
 conducted with the mysid,  Hvsidopsis bahia  (Thursby and Berry 1987b).
 Ninety-five percent of the mysids  exposed during a life-cycle test to 2,400
 pg/L died and no'young were produced by the survivors.  Reproduction of mysids
 in 1,100 pg/L was reduced 94 percent relative  to controls.  No significant
 effects were detected on survival, growth,  or  reproduction  in mysids exposed
 to <540 pg/L for 28 days.  The chronic value for this species is  770.7 pg/L,

-------
                                                                         DRAFT
                                                                       9/22/93
based upon reproductive impairment.  A comparison acute test was conducted
with the chronic test which resulted in an "acute value of 1,930 ^g/L.
Division of this value by the chronic value results in an acute-chronic ratio
of 2.504.
      The Final Acute-Chronic Ratio of 4.137 is the geometric mean of the
acute-chronic ratios of 4.356 for the freshwater cladoceran, Ceriodaphnia
dubia. 5.015 for the freshwater cladoceran,  Daphnia maqna. 5.357 for the
rainbow trout, Oncorhvnchus mvkiss, and 2.504 for the saltwater mysid,
Mvsidopsis bahia (Table 2).,  The acute-chronic ratio of 201.1 for the fathead
minnow was not used in this calculation because, as described in the
Guidelines, this species is not acutely sensitive to aniline and its Species
Mean Acute Value is not close to the Final Acute Value (Table 3).  Division of
the freshwater Final Acute Value of 56.97 ^g/L by 4.137 results in a
freshwater Final Chronic Value of 13.77 Aig/L.  Division of the saltwater Final
Acute Value of 153.4 pg/L by 4.137 results in a saltwater Final Chronic Value
of 37.08 A/g/L.  The freshwater Final Chronic Value is approximately 1.4 times
greater than the lowest freshwater chronic value of 10.1 pg/L for Ceriodaphnia
dubia.  The saltwater Final Chronic Value is a factor of 21 times less than
the only saltwater chronic value of 770.7
Toxicitv to Aquatic Plants
      Results of tests with two species of freshwater green alga exposed to
aniline are shown in Table 4.  Sensitivity to aniline differed between the two
species.  Four-day exposures with aniline and Selenastrum capricornutum showed
that the ECSOs ranged from 1,000 $*g/L  (Adams et al. 1986) to 19,000 pg/L
(Calamari et al. 1980, 1982) with reduced growth as the effect.  Slooff (1982)
determined an EC50 of 20,000 pg/L for  an unidentified species of Selenastrum
with reduced biomass as the effect.  The studies by Adams et al. (1986) were
conducted both with and without a carrier solvent  (acetone).  The  lowest 96-hr
ECSOs were obtained from exposures using acetone.  However, this relationship
was reversed when the exposure duration was increased to five and  six days

-------
                                                                         DRAFT
                                                                       9/22/93
(Table 4).  The green alga, Chlorella vulaaris, is considerably more tolerant
to aniline than selenastrum.  In 14-day exposures, growth of £. vulaaris was
reduced 58% by 306,000 pg/l and 16% by 184,000 fjg/l, (Ammann and Terry 1985).
The study also demonstrated that aniline had significant effects upon
respiration and photosynthesis of the species.  There are no acceptable plant
data for saltwater species for aniline.  A Final Plant Value, as defined in
the Guidelines, cannot be obtained for aniline.

Bioaecumulation
      Studies to determine the bioconcentration of aniline with three species
of organisms have been reported (Table 5).  In all these studies, steady-state
bioconcentrations were not demonstrated.  Daphnia macma bioconcentrated
aniline five times in a 24-hr exposure (Dauble et al. 1984, 1986), a green
alga 91 times in a 24- to 25-hr exposure  (Hardy et al. 1985) and rainbow trout
507 times in a 72-hr exposure (Dauble et  al. 1984).  Because tests were not-of
sufficient duration according to the Guidelines, and no U.S. FDA action level
or other maximum acceptable concentration in tissue is available for aniline,
no Final Residue Value can be calculated.
Other Data
      Other data available concerning aniline  toxicity are presented  in Table
5.  Effects on two species of bacteria were  seen  at aniline  concentrations
ranging  from  30,000 to  130,000  j/g/L.
      Three genera of algae were exposed to  aniline.  One species  of  bluegreen
algae, Microcvstis aeruainosa.  (Bringmann and  Kuhn 1976, 1978a,b),  showed more
sensitivity to aniline  than other species.   Inhibition of cell  replication of
this species  was observed after an 8-day exposure to  160 /ig/L.   Fitzgerald et
al.  (1952) reported a 24-hr LC50 of 20,000 ngfL with  the name species.  A 66%
reduction of  photosynthesis by  the green algae, Selenastrum  capricornutum, was
reported by Giddings  (1979) after a 4-hr exposure to  100,000 pg/L of  aniline.
      Several species of protozoans were exposed  to aniline. A 28-hr aniline

-------
                                                                         DRAFT
                                                                       9/22/93
exposure with Microreoma heterostoma showed that food ingestion was reduced at
20,000 /jg/L (Bringmann and Kuhn 1959a).   Other species of protozoa were tested
and showed less sensitivity to aniline (Table 5).
      The hydrazoan, Hvdra olicractis. showed sensitivity to aniline in a 48-hr
test.  The LC50 for this species of 406 A«g/L was determined by Slooff (1983)
in a static, unmeasured test using river water.  Other organisms such as
planarians fDuqesia luqubris), tubificid worms fTubificidael, and snails
(Lvmnea staanalis) were also tested and had much higher 48-hr LCSOs of
155,000, 450,000 and 800,000 nq/l>, respectively.
      Cladocera appeared to be the group most sensitive to aniline.  Spehar
(1987) reported a 48-hr LC50 of 132 pg/L for Ceriodaohnia dubia in an exposure
in which the organisms were fed their culturing ration.  In the same study, a
LC50 of 44 ^g/L was determined for unfed Ceriodanhnia dubia.  The difference
in results could have been due to the complexation of aniline by the food
and/or increased hardiness of the fed organisms.  Daphnia maana was affected
(acoustic reaction and mortality) at aniline concentrations ranging from 400
to 2,000 A«g/L  (Bringmann and Kuhn 1959a,b, 1960; Lakhnova 1975) for 48-hr
exposures.  Calamari et al.  (1980, 1982) found this  species to be more
resistant to aniline with a reported 24-hr EC50 of 23,000 A/g/L.
      Insects  showed varying sensitivities to aniline.  Puzikova and Markin
(1975) exposed the midge, Chironomus dorsalis. to aniline through  its  complete
life cycle and reported 100% survival at 3,000 jig/L  and 5%  survival at  7,800
Aig/L.  Slooff  (1983) exposed mayfly  and mosquito larvae to  aniline  for  48  hr
and reported LCSOs  of 220,000  and 155,000 vq/1*,  respectively.
      The toxicity  values for  rainbow trout  in Table 5 are  in general
agreement with those used in Table  1.  Rainbow trout were exposed  to  aniline
by several workers  using different  exposure  durations.  Shumway and Palensky
 (1973)  found 100% mortality  of rainbow trout at  100,000 /^g/L in a  48-hr
exposure  and 100% survival at  10,000 pg/L.   Lysak  and Marcinek (1972)  also
reported  100%  mortality for  a 24-hr exposure at  21,000 jig/L and observed no
mortality at 20,000 ^g/L.  Abram and Sims  (1982) determined the 7-day LCSO to

-------
                                                                         DRAFT
                                                                       9/22/93
be 8,200 pg/L in two separate tests using rainbow trout.
      Several tests were run with aniline in dilution waters of different
water quality.  Water hardness appeared to have little, if any, impact on
aniline toxicity -(Birge et al. 1979a,b).  Young channel catfish, Ictalurus
punctatus, were exposed to aniline in waters with a four-fold difference in
hardness  (53.3 and 197.5 mg/L as CaGO,).   The resulting LCSOs indicated only a
slight decrease in toxicity with increasing hardness.  In a similar test they
also exposed goldfish and largemouth bass, Micropterus salmoides, and reported
the opposite effect on toxicity.  pH does not appear to affect toxicity of
aniline with aquatic organisms (Table 5).
      The African clawed frog demonstrated varied effects over a broad range
of concentrations of aniline.  Davis et al.  (1981) and Dumpert (1987) observed
that aniline concentrations of 50 and 70 pg/L resulted in reduced epidermal
pigmentation or failure of larvae to develop normal pigmentation.  In a
12-week exposure, Dumpert (1987) showed that 1,000 pg/L of aniline slowed
metamorphosis and reduced growth.  At an exposure concentration of 10,000 pg/L
for 96-hr, 6% of the frog larvae developed abnormalities (Dumont et al. 1979;
Davis et al. 1981).  Frog embryos had 50% teratogeny in 120- and 96-hr
exposures at 91,000 and 370,000 pg/L, respectively (Table 5).  One hundred
percent mortality of immature frogs occurred during a 12-day exposure to
90,000 pg/L (Dumpert 1987) and 50% mortality during a 48-hr exposure to
560,000 pg/L (Slooff 1982; Slooff and Baerselman 1980).
      Concentrations of the free amino acids aspartate, glutamate and alanine
in the sea anemone, Bunodosoma cavernata. increased after seven days of
exposure to aniline at 500,000 pg/L (Kasschau et al. 1980; Table 5).  The
lethal threshold (geometric mean of the highest concentration with no
mortality and the next higher concentration) was 29,400 pg/L for sand shrimp,
Cranqon septemspinosa, and >55,000 for soft-shelled clams, My_a arenaria
(McLeese et al. 1979).

-------
                                                                         DRAFT
                                                                       9/22/93
Unused Data
       Some data on the effects of aniline on aquatic organisms were not used
because the studies were conducted with species that are not resident in North
America or Hawaii  (Freitag et al. 1984; Hattori et al. 1984; Inel and Atalay
1981; Juhnke and Ludemann 1978; Lallier 1971; Slooff and Baerselman 1980;
Tonogai et al. 1982; Yoshioka et al. 1986a).  Chiou (1985b); Hermens et al.
(1985); Hodson (1985); Koch (1986); Newsome et al. (1984); Persson (1984);
Schultz and Moulton (1984); Slooff et al. (1983); Vighi and Calamari (1987)
compiled data from other sources.  Results were not used where the test
procedures or test material, were not adequately described  (Buzzell et al.
1968; Canton and Adema 1978; Carlson and Caple 1977; Clayberg 1917; Demay and
Menzies 1982; Kuhn and Canton 1979; Kwasniewska and Kaiser 1984; Pawlaczyk-
Szpilowa et al. 1972; Sayk and Schmidt 1986; Shelford 1917; Wellens 1982).
Data were not used when aniline was part of a mixture (Giddings and Franco
1985; Lee et al.  1985; Winters et al. 1977) or when the organisms were exposed
to aniline in food (Lee et al. 1985; Loeb and Kelly 1963).
      Babich and Borenfreund (1988), Batterton et al. (1978), Bols et al.
(1985); Buhler and Rasmusson (1968), Carter et al. (1984), Elmamlouk et al.
(1974), Elmamlouk and Gessner (1976), Fabacher (1982), Lindstrom-Seppa et al.
(1983), Maemura and Omura (1983), Pedersen et al. (1976), Sakai et al. (1983),
and Schwen and Mannering (1982) exposed only enzymes, excised or homogenized
tissue, or cell cultures.  Anderson (1944), and Bringmann and Kuhn (1982)
cultured organisms in one water and conducted tests in another.  Batterton et
al. (1978) conducted a study in which organisms were not tested in water but
were tested on agar in the "algal lawn" test.
      Results of one laboratory test were not used because the test was
conducted in distilled or deionized water without addition of appropriate
salts (Mukai 1977).  Results of laboratory bioconcentration tests were not
used when the test was not flow-through or renewal (Freitag et al. 1985; Geyer
et al. 1981; Geyer et al. 1984) and BCFs obtained from microcosm or model
ecosystem studies were not used where the concentration of aniline in water
                                      10

-------
                                                                         DRAFT
                                                                       9/22/93
decreased with time (Lu and Metcalf 1975; Yount and Shannon 1987).   Douglas et
al. (1986) had insufficient mortalities to Calculate an LC50 and Sollmann
(1949) conducted studies without control exposures.
Summary
      Data on the acute toxicity of aniline are available for nineteen species
of freshwater animals.  Cladocera were the most acutely sensitive group
tested.  Mean 48-hr ECSOs ranged from 125.8 ngfL for Ceriodaphnia dubia to 250
fjg/L for Daphnia macma.  The planarian, Duqesia tiqrina. was the fourth most
sensitive species to aniline with a 96-hr LC50 of 31,600 pg/L.
      Freshwater fish 96-hr LCSOs ranged from 10,600 to 187,000 ^g/L.  Rainbow
trout, Oneorhvnchus mvkiss, were the most sensitive fish tested, with species
mean acute values of 26,130 pg/L.  The bluegill, Lepomis macrochirus, was
nearly as sensitive to aniline as rainbow trout, with a 96-hr LC50 of 49,000
pg/L reported for this species.  The fathead minnow, Pimephales promelas. and,
goldfish, Caraasius auratus. were the most tolerant fish species exposed to
aniline, with species mean acute values of 106,000 /jg/L and 187,000 pg/L,
respectively.
      The most tolerant freshwater species tested with aniline was a midge,
Clinotanvpus pinquis, with a 48-hr LC50 of 477,000 pg/L.  Developmental stages
of an amphibian, Xenopus laevis, had differing sensitivities to aniline.  The
embryos were the most tolerant with a 96-hr LC50 of 550,000 pg/L and the
larvae had a 96-hr LC50 of 150,000 pg/L.
      Data on the acute toxicity of aniline are available for eight species of
saltwater animals.  Species Mean Acute Values ranged from >333,000 /jg/L  for
larval winter flounder, Pseudopleuronectes americanus. to 610 /jg/L for larval
grass shrimp, Palaemonetes ouaio.  Arthropods appear particularly sensitive to
aniline.  There are no data to support the derivation of a  salinity- or
temperature-dependent Final Acute Equation.
      Chronic tests have been conducted with  four  species of  freshwater
organisms.  A chronic value of 10.1 pqfL  for  the cladoceran,  Ceriodaphnia
                                       11

-------
                                                                         DRAFT
                                                                       9/22/93
dubia, was based upon reproductive impairment:.  A chronic value of 33.9 pg/L
for another cladoceran, Daohnia maona, was also based on reproductive
impairment.  Rainbow trout were exposed for 90 days to aniline and the results
showed that survival was reduced at 15,900 pg/L and growth (wet weight) at
7,800 pg/L.  The chronic value for trout of 5,600 /jg/L was based upon growth.
The fathead minnow was exposed for 32 days in an early life-stage test.  The
chronic value of 557 pg/L was also based upon growth.
      One saltwater chronic value was found.  A chronic value of 770.7 pg/L
for the mysid, Mvsidopsis bahia. was based upon reproductive impairment.
      Effects due to aniline have been demonstrated with two freshwater plant
species.  The green alga, Selenastrum capricornutum. had ECSOs ranging from
1,000 to 19,000 .pig/L in 4-day exposures.  Another green alga, Chlorella
vulgaris. was considerably more resistant to aniline, showing a growth
reduction of 58% by 306,000 pg/L in a 14-day exposure.  No acceptable
saltwater plant data have been found.  Final Plant Values, as defined in the •
Guidelines, could not be obtained for aniline.
      No suitable data have been found for determining the bioconcentration of
aniline in freshwater or saltwater organisms.
      Acute-chronic ratio data that are acceptable for deriving numerical
water quality criteria are available for three species of freshwater animals
and one species of saltwater animal.  The acute-chronic ratios range from
2.504 to 5.357 with a geometric mean of 4.137.
      The freshwater Final Acute Value for aniline is 56.97 jug/L and the Final
Chronic Value is 13.77 /jg/L.  The Freshwater Final Chronic Value is 1.4 times
greater than the lowest chronic value observed for one species of Cladocera
indicating that sensitive species of this group may not be adequately
protected if ambient water concentrations exceed this value.  The saltwater
Final Acute Value for aniline is 153.4 pg/L and the Final Chronic Value is
37.08 Aig/L.  Chronic adverse effects to the only saltwater species exposed to
aniline occurred at concentrations that are higher than the saltwater Final
Chronic Value which should be protective of saltwater organisms.
                                      12

-------
                                                                         DRAFT
                                                                       9/22/93
National Criteria
      The procedures described in the "Guidelines for Deriving Numerical
National Water Quality Criteria for the Protection of Aquatic Organisms and
Their Uses" indicate that, except for certain sensitive species of Cladocera,
freshwater organisms and their uses should not be affected unacceptably if the
four-day average concentration of aniline does not exceed 14 pg/L more than
once every three years on the average and if the one-hour average
concentration does not exceed 28 pg/L more than once every three years on the
average.
      The procedures described in the "Guidelines for Deriving Numerical
National Water Quality Criteria for the Protection of Aquatic Organisms and
Their Uses" indicate that, except possibly where a locally important species
is very sensitive, saltwater organisms and their uses should not be affected
unacceptably if the four-day average concentration of aniline does not exceed
37 pg/L more than once every three years on the average and if the one-hour  •
average concentration does not exceed 77 pg/L more than once every three years
on the average.

Implementation
      As discussed in the Water Quality Standards Regulation (U.S. EPA 1983a)
and the Foreword to this document, a water quality criterion for aquatic life
has regulatory impact only after it has been adopted in a state water quality
standard.  Such a standard specifies a criterion for a pollutant that is
consistent with a particular designated use.  With the concurrence of the U.S.
EPA, states designate one or more uses for each body of water or segment
thereof and adopt criteria that are consistent with the use(s)  (U.S. EPA ,
1983b,  1987).  Water quality criteria adopted in state water quality standards
could have the same numerical values as criteria developed under Section 304,
of the Clean Water Act.  However, in many situations states might want to
adjust water quality criteria developed under Section 304 to reflect local
environmental conditions and human exposure patterns.  Alternatively, states
                                      13

-------
                                                                         DRAFT
                                                                       9/22/93
may use different data and assumptions than EPA in deriving numeric criteria
that are scientifically defensible and protective of designated uses.  State
water quality standards include both numeric and narrative criteria.  A state
may adopt a numeric criterion within its water quality standards and apply it
either state-wide to all waters designated for the use the criterion is
designed to protect or to a specific site.  A state may use an indicator
parameter or the national criterion, supplemented with other relevant
information, to interpret its narrative criteria within its water quality
standards when developing NPDES effluent limitations under 40 CFR
122.44(d)(1)(vi).2
      Site-specific criteria may include not only site-specific criterion
concentrations (U.S. EPA 1983b), but also site-specific, and possibly
pollutant-specific, durations of averaging periods and frequencies of allowed
excursions (U.S. EPA 1991).  The averaging periods of "one hour" and "four
days" were selected by the U.S. EPA on the basis of data concerning how      •
rapidly some aquatic species react to increases in the concentrations of some
pollutants, and "three years" is the Agency's best scientific judgment of the
average amount of time aquatic ecosystems should be provided between
excursions (Stephan et al. 1985; U.S. EPA 1991).  However, various species and
ecosystems react and recover at greatly differing rates.  Therefore, if
adequate justification is provided, site-specific and/or pollutant-specific
concentrations, durations and frequencies may be higher or lower than those
given in national water quality criteria for aquatic life.
      Use of criteria, which have been adopted in state water quality
standards, for developing water quality-based permit limits and for designing
waste treatment facilities requires selection of an appropriate wasteload
allocation model.  Although dynamic models are preferred for the application
of these criteria  (U.S. EPA 1991), limited data or other considerations might
require the use of a steady-state model (U.S. EPA 1986).
      Guidance on mixing zones and the design .of monitoring programs is
available  (U.S. EPA 1987, 1.991).
                                      14

-------
                                                                                                                                                   
                                        I
                                       UJ
                                                09

                                                O>
•5
«*
o


XI
                  o
         <0
         00
         en
                           00
                           en
                           ?
                  «       J2

                  I       I
                  I       i
oo
en
 f
-B
 o
00
en
                                                                                             oo
                                                                                             en
                                    I       I
No
                                                                        r-.
                                                                        oo
                                                                        en
                           •2

                            S

                           I

                           I
                                                                                                               r-
                                                                                                               09
                                                                                                               Cn
                                                                o
                                                                a
                                                               CO
                                                                                          09
                                                                                          an
                                                                                          i*.
                                                                                          00
                                                                                                   I

                                                                                                   "1
                                                               
                                                      o
                                                      fl—
                                                      CM
                              in
                              op

                              in
                              
-------
 CO
te.
                                       (O
                                       09
                                       m
•5

 c


"5


ILI
CO

09
e»
                                  00
                                  on
         
         To

         c

         o
                                                   00
                                                   en
                                           eg



                                           o


                                          1
                                           o



                                          I
                                                                                                  CM

                                                                                                  00
                                                                                                  04
                                                                                                           CM
                                                                                                           09
                                                                                                           at
                                                                                    §
                                                                                    en
                                                                                             CM
                                                                                             00
                                                                                             en
                                                           o
                                                           00
                                                           en
                                                                                                  W       "»
                                                                                                  1
                                                                                                           a
                                                                                                           O
                                                   CO
                                                   en
                                                                                                     •5


                                                                                                      o

                                                                                                      c
                                                                                                      o
                                                                                                      en
                                                                                                     •D
                                                                                                      O
                                                                                                                                    oo
                                                                                                                                    en
                                                                                     09
                                                                                     o>
                                                                                     a
                                                                                     a
                                                                                     CO
                               q
                               o
                               in
                               (M
O
o
o


8

A
                         o

                         8

                         A
                                                        8
en

-------
                             CO
                                en
-j o>   en
«* ^   V-




J-   -
•9 c   «

i %   s
U O   CB

"3 '5   '5
X U   (9
                                                              CO
                                                              CT)
I
                                CO
                                en
                                                                      •s

                                                                      c
                                 CO
                                 en
                                                                                      CO
                                                                                      en
                                                    eo
                                                    en
                                                                                                 Q
                                              CO
                                              en
                                                                                                            •3
                                                               'I
                                                               O
                                                                                                                             a
                                                                                                                             r-
                                                                                                                             co
                                                                                                                             O)
                                                                                                                             •o
                                                                                                                             c
                                                                                                                             a
                                                                                               CO
                                                                                               en
                                                                                               00

                                                                                               1
                                                                                                O


                                                                                               •i
                                                      O
                                                      O
                                                      CD

                                                      O
                                                                       o
                                                                       o
                                                                       o
                                                                       in
                                                                               o
                                                                               o
                                                                               o

                                                                               o
                                                                               to
                                                                               A
                             o
                             o
                             o
o
o
o
cj
co
o
o
en
O
O

q
                                                                              00
                                                                              r-.
                                         b


                                         §

                                         g
                                         in
                                                    §
                                                    en
                                                       o
                                                       o
                                                       o

                                                       o"
                                                       co
                                                       A
o
en
O
                                     U)

                                     CO

                                     in

                                     
                                     O
                                      S
                                     tr
                en
                en
                                                                                                                             o
                                                                                                                             o
                                      M
                                                                                      CA
                                                                                                 (A
                                                                                                             (A
                                                                                                                             3

                                                                                                                             09
                                                                                                3

                                                                                                of
o
o


                                        l
                                              •at
                fi
                                                      •8
                                                              I 2
                                                               c a

                                                               5 1
                                                                  l
                                                              o u
i!
II
 3  Q
a
                                          a
                                          o
                                                  i
                                                    £ x
                                                                                                  o
                                                            •s  I-
                                                             o  c
                                                                « S
                                                               •5
                                                                   I
                                                                                        i
                                                                                        111 U
                                                                                        5 .2
                                                                                        a' . >

                                                                                        55
                                                                         17

-------
.o
00
o>
£
• &-
c
«
1
|

00
0>

I
(0
1

1
0
K
a
r»
00

£•
1
1
a
1
J
>•
a
r-
00
en
£•
I
•w
c
o
f
ij
H*
a
on
o>
K
&
1!
49
f
J!
H*
                     OB
                     a>
                     o
                     00
                     00
                     en
                     I
e>
g

-------
                                CO
                                00
                                O)
                                                      eo
                                                      eo



                                                      I
                c
                I
                         eo
                         en
                          Q.

                          W
      00
      en
o

(9
             c

             I
             u
O
09

C9
ro
                                      in
                                            in
                                            in
a
•5
I


O
a
.£
•s
s.
•3
•s
                         f.

                         oi
      8
      «    8
      f»    r-
      p    «
      o    ^
                      O
                      O
                                                      §
                                                      in
op

CO
      ».     S
      «•*     »:
u
                         in
                         en
                         o>
0>
o>
      in

      en
      en
on
en
          8
                            i
                          u o
Ij
ii
       II
       K O
 i 2
1 S

n
                         a
                        . o
                       S S
                                                            19

-------
                   rt

                   iri
o
10
                               
                         n
                 •^
                 6
         a
        a.
         o

         o


        6
£     "*"
                 o
                 CO
                 ei
                                          
-------
            s-i
            .? §
            Q. U

            W  <
 i

 §
'i
 a.
in
 B


 §



I
 c
 a
 b
                               8
                               en
o
§
                                       CM
                                       «*•
8


CM

CM
                         §
                         o

                         m

                         CM

                         A
                                 8
                                 o
                o

                8

                S
O
O
O

o"
O
                                                                                 O
                                                                                 o
                                                                                 o

                                                                                 o"
                                                                                 o
                                         o
                                         o
                                         o
                                         o"
                                         o
o

8
o
o
o

§
CO
.SS
c
e>
1
c
'o
Midga,
ClinotanvDUB
a
0
o
o

1
a
li
lii
c
09
C
n
c
c
Midge,
Chironomua 1
S
1
i
Midge,
TanvDUs neo

09
ja
1
.1
Midge,
Tanvtarsus d
a
£
Q
1
_-S
•5 «
C 0
w <
„
3
05
Goldfish,
2 j. J
"8-8
African claw
Xenopus lasv
II
Fathead mini
Pimephales c
f
g
1
Annelid,
Lumbriculus '

09
i
s
Amphipod,
Gammarus fi
                                                                                                                        S <
Snail,

Heliso
                                                                                                     o
                                                                                                  >; o
                                                                                                  o
                                                                                                  .X
                                                                                                  u
                                                                                                  3 _
                                                                                                  0) O

                                                                                                  o «

                                                                                                  i 2
                                                                                                  5^- o
                                                                                                     o
•g
 o
e
CO
 a


S
8
en
S
o
en
ro
                                                       o
                                                       o
                                                       (M      i-
                                                                       8
(M

A
I      I
6      S
                                                                 8
                                                                 q
                                                                 8
                                                                 o
                                                                 8

                                                                 8
                                                 o

                                                 8
                                                 o"
                                                 o
                                o
                                o
                                                                         21

-------
           c o

             2
           5 S
           9 3
           a o
           co <
                              in
                              ro
      in
      
                       
                        
-------
           ^ -c .S  O

           1 9 o  ">.
           •g s cd  rj


           Q. U
           W <
 .1
Tl Tl
'!'!
II


II
                        o

                        CO
_o


CO
                  CM
                               a


                              I
O

c
o
                              c
                              i
                              O
                                                 "a
                                                 s
                                                 U

                                                 CM
                                                     (O
                                                     t«.

                                                     II
                      I
                                                                      '3   !
                                                             a
                                                             q
                                                 TO

                                                 U

                                                 co   m
                                                 in   •-
                                             en

                                             
                                 E E
                              ill
                           I  I   1
                           s  I   K
                           •S  S
                           iZ  U
                                      t>-
                                      
o
3
O
<
|


»*
C3
C
o
u
1
1

e
o
•E
1


.S
c
S
u
1
<
•E
iZ



(PHI

II
a
•i
o
'c
o
0
1
if



-------
                           CO
                           OQ
 
                                    •o
                           

                                              (O
                                              CO
                                              0)
                                    •5

                                    «
                                                                                  cs
                                                                                  CO
                                                                                  CD
                                                                                                          I
                                                                                                          a
                                                                                                          c
                                                                                                          c
                                                                                                          a
                                                                                                          E !S
                           8
                           o
                           1C
                           V
                                    o
                                    o
                                    in
                                                                        §
                                                                        in
                                                                      o
                                                                      o
                                                                      o
£
o


I
<

'o


'5

'§
                  O S
                  in 2
                  o 2
                  in ^

J
                                     il
          a


         I?


         II

                                             |1
                                             £ o
                                                                                          11
                                                                                          i  2
                                                                                          '5. S
                                                                           _   o
                                                                           <«   o  —

                                                                        in I   •§  o


                                                                        *" §   #  .£
                                                                               
-------
                        e-

                        3
         ne
           fin   cm
           co   2 ^

        <2   |2
£!   §
        m
~ x:

§1
•a o
• ~
w Q

# £
co
in
§
^e
                        g
                        -s j=

                        §?
                        -o o
!
a
                                     a '



                                «    I
                       *       !
                                     I
                                     •5
                                     o





_
^

c
J
*
c
1
t-
1
1
6






1
W

1*1






1
roan alga,
hlorolla vul
•
1
0
raan alga,
hlorelta vu!

1
41
II



o o o o o m



•s
i .
j? •»
^ «
0 a
•< 3
I|
€ u
if
• •* .
                                                       25

-------
                                CO


                                t TJ
                 C
                •c
 n  a c f»    '•»    & «M
 e  c  .c rx     Srv    ff in
•c -c  3 8>     o o>    -    o>
                                                                      a i<:  -•    oo
                                                                                                                        e>
                                                                                                                        ix
                                                                                                                        o>
                                §
                                O

                                o"
                                m
                         O

                         §


                         8
                      o
                      «>
§
o
o
§
CO
to
8
o

8
o

§
 a)

O
 O

I

'c
UJ

 o
j:

 c
 o

s

a
                                o
                               •s
                               3
                                s

                               'a.
                               '5
it
                         8R
                         o
                         in
                                                               c
                                                               o
                                                               •s

                                                               1
                                                                                     I
                                                                                     2
                                                                            o

                                                                            Q.
                                                                                                                                                  c
                                                                                                                                                  o
                                                         CM
                                                                      I           I
                                                               •o

                                                               CO
                                                           in
                                                           CM


                                                           CM
                                                                                                                                     00
                                               oo

                                               cd
                                                                                  to
                                                                                                                        1
                                                                                                                        (9

                                                                                                                        i
                                a  S
                               ffl  0.
I
=
Bacterium,
Spirillum vo
• 0 _
o o a
•S ~S _-3
Blue-green i
Microcvsiis
e
eg
Blue-green i
Microcvstis
aeruainosa
Green algan
Scenedesm

quadricaudi
. y
Green algae
Scenedesm
•H
quadricaudi
5
Green alga,
Scenedesm
•fl
quadricaudi

Green algae
Selenastruri
fc
capricornutl
.. a
Protozoan,
Chilomonaa
paramaeciu

Protozoan,
Entosiphon
sulcatum
                                                                                         26

-------
             in
           o m

           ii
                                 oo
                                 en
 • «   «
 §8   g
 o en   X-


III
CO *   O)
«
co
en



o
°
                                                    oo
                                                    a>
                             oo
                             a>
                             CM
                             eo
                             o>
                             o
                             £

                             (O
                                                                  00
                                                                  en
                                                                   c
                                                                   a
                                                                  (0
                                                                                                         in
                                                                                                         r-
                                                                                                         o>
                                                                                  in
                                                                                  i—
                                                                                  en
.1
                                                    O
                                                    o
                                                    o
                             O

                             8

                             8
                             00
                                                                  CM
                                                                  CO
                                                     8
                                                     in
                                                                           o
                                                                           O
                                                                    8
                                                                    o_
                                                                    oo"
   1     1
   j:

u> 3
u 2
UJ CD
                              c
                              o
                              •s
                              a
                              :§•
       S
       u
o
in
u
                      o
                      in
                      u
                                    O
                                    in
                                    a
                                               o
   a


§1
S^   8
                                                                                                  q
                                                                                                  tri
                                       o
                                       in
                      o
                      in
          CO
          CM
               §
                      00
                      «*•
                             00
                             1-
                        If
                        CM
                                                                                                  CM
                    co

                    (O
en

-------
in
en
a
c
I
in
. en-
a
c
I
in
en
a
c
1
in
en
a
1
O
1? en
a ^
O N
£ 3
51
o
•a en
E en
is •-
O N
S S
19 •=
U 2
•5
e
e
o .a
2 S
a 00
o en
is
5 •"
o.£
Is
Zz
a 2
ll
II
IE
c en
§ "
il
li
CO
o
01
CM
00
en
1
in
                                                                                        M
                O
                o
                             eft
                  o
                  o
                  o
                  o"
                  o
                  o
                                         §
                 o
                 §
                  o

                  8

                  8
                                                                                §
                                                                                in
                                                                                in
                    O

                    8
                S
      o
      in
o
£
o

12
                        u

                        <
                                             u
      o
      in
      U
                                         >


                                         c
                                                         tn
                                                         en
                                                               >•

                                                               I
                                               #
                                               o
                                               m
            I     s
            I     2
            o
            s
•o
o
                      I
                     •o

                     in
                           o
                           oi
                  eg
                  •o

                  in

                  n
I
13
'>•
•o


N
                                               I
                                               •o
I
•o

*?•
s
                                               £


                                               00
                                       en
                                                           00
                                                           e>

                                                           A
.o


in
   a



If
u a
                     o o
                                  §1
                                 •S Q
                  s i
                                                                 "S   "^
                                                                 s

                                                                 I   II
                                                                 = -j a
                                                                 |2-§
                                                                 1.14
                                            I
                                            s •»
                                            51
                                                       28

-------
                             09
                             CD
                                            CM
                                            IX
                                            en
               CM
               ix
               on
e

M
c
e

"o
K
                   2
            iS 2

            11
                                                                   S n
                                                                  5-1
                                                                  M a.
                                                                                      s     s
                                                                             o>
                                                                             r-
                                                                             
-------
                      .O
                      O>
                               o>
                               IV
                             .o
                             m
        o>
        rv
        o>
                                 .Q
                                 O>
                                                      O>
                                                      |v
                                                      
                                                  .0

                                                  0)
                                                  fv

                                                  O)
                                                                             .O
                                                                             O)
                                                                             fv

                                                                             O>
           £

          I

                             o

                             o
                               ffi
                                      o

                                     m
                                 -5

                                 c

                                 a
                                                                •5

                                                                «5
                                          c
                                          a

                                          a
                                                  c
                                                  c
                                                                             o
                                                                             o

                                                                             m
                               8s
                               8 o
                               o m-
                               ° s.
                             o
                             o
                             
u
o
in
O
                 u
                                 §
                                 o
                g
                o
s
o
g
o
g
a
o
in
u
              2 8"
              e -a

              * to
            •o
            in
            co
                 >• ° —

                 •8 el
                                                          'S
                                                          ~*
                                                  £ I

                                               2  « "i
                                                                                            §. »
                                                                                            w o
                                                                                    o _
                                                                                  Ti Q. j;

                                                                                  U) « 2
                       fv


                       IV
                     IV


                     fv
                         IV


                         fv
                         IV


                         fv
                                                          IV


                                                          fv
                                          |v

                                          fv
                           rv

                           fv
•g
o
in
c
||1



ill
5-o-2
               O •£• £
                         — S
             111
                         II
                         c o
                       O .£ .2
                                 -S O
|   |




Ll

111
                                                  ^ 3
                              «•
                         •o -S a
                         •s 1 s
                         U £ U
                                                                   •£• O
                                                                           f 2

                                                                              i
                                          <

                                          11

                                          O £. O
                                                         30

-------
                   .Q

                   O)
           "a

           o


           |

           (5
                           r-
                           c>
        o

        O
                .o
                o>
                r-
                en
                CO
                en
              09

              O)
                               t»


                               i
                                                                     CO
                                                                     o>
                                                  t:
                                                  9
                                                 O
                                                 00

                                                 
                                        o
                                        g
        I
        uj|

O
in
O
S
O
O
in

O
O S
uj a

  o
  So
  o>

a *
                                 •5
                                  o


                                 I
             O _
           in

           o'S
  €3


ft
a in

•f «?•

^«
  CM
I
                                     o „
o-
o.
        
                                          •I.
                                          Ill
                                          < S X
                                                 I

                                                 i
                                                 s
                                                 a

                                                         •t
                                                         
-------
              I O
              £ oo
              a m
          SB
        II
  n • — ^

5 § 2 g. rf


1 5 I S I
55 .£ i g §


     *
1
              a
              •o
          .c

          CD
          
•o
oa


•a
in

o
              W CO
                        §i 2
                        w S. o
                     « €


                     I!
                     — CL




                     II
                                 32

-------
                                                                         DRAFT
                                                                       9/22/93
                                  REFERENCES
Abram, F.S. and  I.R. Sims. 1982. The toxicity of aniline to rainbow trout.
Water Res. 16:1309-1312.

Adams, N., K.H.  Goulding and A.J. Oobbs. 1985. Toxicity of eight water-soluble
organic chemicals to Selenastrum capricornutum; A study of methods for
calculating toxic values using different growth parameters. Arch. Environ.
Contain. Toxicol. 14:333-345.

Adams, N., K.H.  Goulding and A.J. Dobbs. 1986. Effect of acetone on the
toxicity of four chemicals to Selenastrum capr icornutum. Bull. Environ.
Contain. Toxicol. 36:254-259.

                                                                            1
Ammann, H.M. and B. Terry. 1985. Effect of aniline on Chlorella vulaaris.
Bull. Environ. Contain. Toxicol. 35:234-239.

Anderson, B.C. 1944. The toxicity thresholds of various substances found in
industrial waters as determined by the use of Daphnia magna. Sew. Works J.
16:1156-1165.

Babich, H. and E. Borenfreund. 1988. Structure-activity relationships for
diorganotins, chlorinated benzenes, and chlorinated anilines established with
bluegill sunfish BF-2 cells. Fundament. Appl. Toxicol. 10:295-301.

Batterton, J., K. Winters and C. Van Baalen. 1978. Anilines: Selective
toxicity to blue-green algae. Science 199:1068-1070.

Biesinger, K.E.  1987. U.S. EPA, Duluth, MN.  (Memorandum to L.T. Brooke,
University of Wisconsin-Superior, Superior, WI. February 10).
                                      33

-------
                                                                         DRAFT
                                                                       9/22/93
Birge, W.J., J.A. Black and D.M. Bruser. 1979a. Toxicity of organic chemicals
to embryo-larval stages of fish. EPA-560/11-79-007 or PB80-101637. National
Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA.

Birge, W.J., J.A. Black, J.E. Hudson and D.M. Bruser. 1979b. Embryo-larval
toxicity tests with organic compounds.. In: Aquatic toxicology. Marking, L.L.
and R.A. Kimerle (Eds.). ASTM STP 667. American Society for Testing and
Materials. Philadelphia, PA. pp. 131-147.

Bols, N.C., S.A. Boliska, D.G. Dixon, P.V. Hodson and K.L. Kaiser. 1985. The
use of fish cell cultures sis an indication of  contaminant toxicity to  fish.
Aquat. Toxicol.  6:147-155.

Bowdre, J.H. and N.R. Krieg.  1974. Water  quality monitoring:  Bacteria  as    ^
indicators. VWRRC Bull. No  69.  Virginia Water  Resources Research Center,
Blacksburg, VA.  or  PB 237-061.  National Technical  Information Service,
Springfield, VA.                      •

Bringmann,  G.  1973.  Determination  of the  biological damage from water
pollutants  from the inhibition of  glucose assimilation in the bacterium
Pseudomonas fluorescens.  Gesundh.-Ingen.  94:366-369.

Bringmann,  G.  1978. Determination of the biological toxicity of water-bound
 substances towards protozoa. I. Bacteriovorous flagellates (Model organism:
 Entosiohon aulcatum Stein). Z. Wasser Abwasser Forsch. 11:210-215.

 Bringmann, G. and R. Kuhn. 1959a. Water-toxicological investigations with
 protozoa as test organisms. Gesundh. Ingen. 8:239-242.

 Bringmann, G. and R. Kuhn. 1959b. Comparative water-toxicological
 investigations  on bacteria, algae,  and Daphnia. Gesundh.-Ingen.  80:115-120.
                                        34

-------
                                                                         DRAFT
                                                                       9/22/93

Bringmann, G. and R. Kuhn. 1960. Results of water-toxicological tests of

insecticides. Gesundh.-Ingen. 81:243-244.

          B

Bringmann, G. and R. Kuhn. 1976. Comparative results of the damaging effects

of water pollutants against bacteria (Pseudomonas putidal and blue-green algae

(Hicrocvstis aeruginosal. Gas-Wasserfach, Wasser-Abwasser 117:410-413.



Bringmann, G. and R. Kuhn. 1977a. The toxicity of water-borne contaminants

towards Daphnia magna. Z. Wasser Abwasser Forsch. 10:161-166.



Bringmann, G. and R. Kuhn. 1977b. Limiting values for the damaging action of

water pollutants to bacteria  (Pseudomonas putida) and green algae  (Scenedesmus

guadricauda) in the cell multiplication test. Z. Wasser Abwasser Forsch.

10:87-98.                                                                   *



Bringmann, G. and R. Kuhn. 1978a. Studies on the effects of water pollutants

on blue-green algae (Microcvstis aerucrinosal and green algae  (Scenedesmus

quadricaudal using the cell replication test. Vom Wasser 50:45-60.



Bringmann, G. and R. Kuhn. 1978b. Testing of substances for their toxicity

threshold: Model organisms Microcvstis  (Diplocvstisl aerucrinosa and

Scenedesmug quadrieauda. Mitt.  Int. Ver. Theor. Angew. Lirnnol. 21:275-284.



Bringmann, G. and R. Kuhn. 1980a. Determination of the biological effect of

water pollutants in protozoa. II. Bacteriovorous cilliatea. Z. Wasser Abwasser

Forsch. 13:26-31.



Bringmann, G. and R. Kuhn. 1980b. Comparison of the  toxicity  thresholds of

water pollutants to bacteria, algae, and protozoa in the cell multiplication

inhibition test. Water Res.  14:231-241.
                                       35

-------
                                                                         DRAFT
                                                                       9/22/93
Bringmann, G. and R. Kuhn. 1981. Comparison of effect of harmful substances on
flagellates and ciliates as well as on bacteriovorous and saprozoic
protozoans. Gas-Wasserfach, Wasser-Abwasser 122:308-313.

Bringmann, G. and R. Kuhn. 1982. Results of toxic action of water pollutants
on Daphnia maana Straus tested by an improved standardized procedure. Z.
Wasser Abwasser Forsch. 15:1-6.

Bringmann, G., R. Kuhn and A. Winter. 1980. Determination of the biological
effect of water pollutants in protozoa. III. Saprozoic flagellates. Z. Wasser
Abwasser Forsch. 13:170-173.

Brooke, L.T., D.J.  Call, D.L. Geiger and C.E. Northcott  (Eds.). 1984. Acute
toxicities of organic chemicals to fathead minnows  (Pimephales promelas). Vql.
1. Center  for Lake  Superior Environmental Studies,  University of Wisconsin -'
Superior,  Superior, WI. 414 p.

Buhler, D.R. and M.E. Rasmusson.  1968. The oxidation of  drugs by fishes. Comp.
Biochero.  Physiol. 25:223-239.

Buzzel, J.C., Jr.,  R-H. Young  and D.W. Ryckman.  1968.  Behavior  or  organic
chemicals in the  aquatic  environment.  Part  II.  Behavior in dilute  systems.
Research  Report.  Environmental and Sanitary Engineering Laboratories.
Washington University,  St. Louis, MO.

Calamari, D.,  R.  DaGasso, S.  Galassi,  A.  Provini and M. Vighi.  1980.
Biodegradation and toxicity of selected amines on aquatic organisms.
Chemosphere 9:753-762.

 Canton,  J.H. and D.M. Adema. 1978. Reproducibility of short-term and
 reproduction toxicity experiments with Danhnia maqna and comparison of the
                                       36

-------
                                                                         DRAFT
                                                                       9/22/93
sensitivity of Daphnia maqna with Daphnia pulex and Daphnia cucullata in
short-term experiments. Hydrobiologia 59:135-140.

Carlson, R.M.-and R. Caple. 1977. Chemical/biological implications of using
chlorine and ozone for disinfection. EPA-600/3-77-066. National Technical
Information Service, Springfield, VA.

Carter, F.D., R.L. Puyear and J.D. Brammer. 1984. Effects of Aroclor 1254
treatment on the in vitro hepatic metabolism of toluene, aniline and
aminopyrine. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 78C:137-140.

Chiou, C.T. 1985a. Partition coefficients of organic compounds in environment.
In: Kaiser, L.E. (Ed.). QSAR in environmental toxicology. D. Reidel Publ. Co.,
Dordrecht, West Germany.                                                    ^

Chiou, C.T. 1985b. Partition coefficients of organic compounds in lipid-water
systems and correlations with fish bioconcentration factors. Environ. Sci.
Technol. 19:57-62.

Clayberg, H.D. 1917. The effect of ether and chloroform on certain fishes.
Biol. Bull. 32:239-249.

Dauble, D.D., D.W. Carlile and R.W. Hanf, Jr. 1986. Bioaccumulation of  fossil
fuel components during  single-compound and  complex-mixture exposures of
Daphnia maqna. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol.  37:125-132.

Dauble, D.D., R.G. Riley, R.M. Bean, E.W. Lusty and R.W. Hanf, Jr. 1984.
Uptake  and  fate of phenol and aniline in rainbow trout  and daphnids during
single-compound and  complex mixture  exposures.  U.S. Department of Energy.
DE85002802. National Technical Information  Service, Springfield, VA.
                                       37

-------
                                                                         DRAFT
                                                                       9/22/93

Bavi.3, X..R., T.W. Schultz and J.N. Dumont. 1981. Toxic and teratogenic effects

of selected aromatic amines on embryos of the amphibian Xenopus laevis. Arch.

Environ. Contain. Toxicol. 10:371-391.



DeMay, D.J. and R.A. Menzies. 1982. Evidence for a cytochrome P-450 mixed

function oxidase system in algae. Abst. No. 6008, Fed. Proc. 41:1298.



Douglas, M.T., D.O. Chanter, I.B. Pell and G.M. Burney. 1986. A proposal for

the reduction of animal numbers required  for the acute toxicity to  fish test

(LC50 determination). Aquat. Toxicol. 8:243-249.



Dumont, J.N., T.W. Schultz and R.D. Jones. 1979. Toxicity  and teratogenicity

of aromatic amines to Xenopus laevis. Bull. Environ.  Contam. Toxicol.

22:159-166.



Dumpert, K. 1987. Embryotoxic effects of  environmental chemicals:  Tests with

the South  African clawed toad  IXenopus  laevis). Ecotoxicol.  Environ.  Safety

13:324-338.



Elmamlouk, T.H.  and T. Gessner.  1976. Mixed  function oxidases  and

nitroreductases  in hepatopanereas of  Homarus  americanus.  Comp.  Biochem.

Physiol.  53C:57-62.



Elmamlouk, T.H., T. Gessner  and A.C.  Brownie.  1974.  Occurrence of cytochrome

P-450 in hepatopanereas  of Homarus americanus.  Comp. Biochem.  Physiol.

488:419-425.



Ewell,  W.S.,  J.W.  Gorsuch, R.O.  Kringle,  K.A.  Robillard and R.C. Spiegel.

 1986. Simultaneous evaluation of the acute effects of chemicals on seven

 aquatic species. Environ.  Toxicol. Chem.  5:831-840.
                                       38

-------
                                                                          DRAFT
                                                                        9/22/93
 Fabacher,  D.L.  1982.  Hepatic  microsomes from freshwater  fish.  I.  In  vitro
 cytochrome P-450 chemical  interactions. Comp.  Biochem. Physiol.  73C:277-
 283.

 Fitzgerald/  G.P.,  G.C.  Gerloff  and F.  Skoog.  1952.  Stream pollution.  Studies
 on  chemicals with selective toxicity to blue-green  algae. Sew.  Ind.  Wastes
 24:888-896.

 Franco, P.J., K.L. Daniels, R.M.  Cushman and G.A. Kazlow. .1984.  Acute toxicity
 of  a synthetic  oil, aniline and phenol to laboratory and natural populations
 of  chironomid (Diptera) larvae. Environ,  pollut.  (Series A) 34:321-331.

 Freitag, D.,  J.P.  Lay and  F.  Korte.  1984.  Environmental  hazard  profile -  test
 results as related to structures  and translation  into the environment.  In:
 QSAR in environmental toxicolgy.  kaiser,  L.E.  (Ed.). D.  Reidel  Publ.  Co.     »
 Dordrecht, W. Germany,  pp. 111-131.

 Freitag, D.,  L.  Ballhorn,  H.  Geyer  and F.  Korte.  1985. Environmental  hazard
 profile of organic chemicals. An  experimental method for the assessment of the
 behavior of organic chemicals in  the ecosphere by means  of simple laboratory
 tests with 14C  labelled chemicals.  Chemosphere 14:1589-1616.

 Geiger, D.L., L.T. Brooke  and D.J.  Call (Eds.). 1990. Acute toxicities of
 organic chemicals to fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas). Vol.  5.  Center for
Lake Superior Environmental Studies, University of Wisconsin-Superior,
Superior, WI. 332 p.

Geiger, D.L., D.J. Call and L.T.  Brooke (Eds). 1988. Acute toxicities  of
organic chemicals to fathead minnows (Pimephales jorornelas). Vol.  4. Center for
Lake Superior Environmental Studies, University of Wisconsin - Superior,
Superior, Wi. 350 p.
                                      39

-------
                                                                         DRAFT
                                                                       9/22/93

Geiger, D.L., S.H. Poirier, L.T. Brooke and D.J. Call (Eds.). 1986. Acute

toxicities of organic chemicals to fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas). Vol.

3. Center for Lake Superior Environmental Studies, University of Wisconsin -

Superior, Superior, WI. 328 p.



Gersich, F.M. and M.A. Mayes. 1986. Acute toxicity tests with Daphnia maqna

Straus and Pimephales promelas Rafinesque in support of national pollutant

discharge elimination permit requirements. Water Res. 20:939-941.



Gersich, F.M. and D.P. Milazzo. 1988. Chronic toxicity of aniline and

2,4-dichlorophenol to Daphnia magna Straus. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol.

40:1-7.



Gersich, F.M. and D.P. Milazzo.  1990.  Evaluation of a 14-day static renewal

toxicity test with Daphnia magna Straus. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol.

19:72-76.



Geyer, H., R. Viswanathan, -D. Freitag and F. Korte. 1981. Relationship between

water solubility of organic chemicals and their bioaccumulation by the alga

Chlorella. Chemosphere 10:1307-1313.



Geyer, H., G. Politzki and D. Freitag. 1984. Predition of ecotoxicological

behavior of chemicals: Relationship between n-octanol/water partition

coefficient and bioaccumulation of organic chemicals by alga Chlorella.

Chemosphere 13:269-284.



Giddings, J.M. 1979. Acute toxicity to Selenastrum caprieornutum of aromatic

compounds from coal conversion. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 23:360-364.



Giddings, J.M. and P.J. Franco. 1985. Calibration of laboratory bioassays with

results from microcosms and ponds. In: Validation and predictability of
                                      40

-------
                                                                         DRAFT
                                                                       9/22/93

laboratory methods for assessing the fate and effects of contaminants in

aquatic ecosystems. Boyle, T.P. (Ed.). ASTM" STP 865. American Society for

Testing and Materials. Philadelphia, PA. pp. 104-119.



Hardy, J.T., D.D. Dauble and L.J. Felice. 1985. Aquatic fate of synfuel

residuals: Bioaccumulation of aniline and phenol by the freshwater

phytoplankter Scenedesmus ouadricauda. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 4:29-35.



Hattori, M., K. Senoo, S. Harada, Y. Ishizu and M. Goto. 1984. The Daphnia

reproduction test of some environmental chemicals. Seitai Kagaki 6:23-27.



Hermens, J., P. Leeuwangh and A. Musch. 1984. Quantitative structure-activity

relationships and mixture toxicity studies of chloro- and alkylanilines at an

acute lethal toxicity level to the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Ecotoxicol.

Environ. Safety 8:388-394.



Hermens, J., P. Leeuwangh and A. Musch. 1985. Joint toxicity of mixtures of

groups of organic aquatic pollutants to the guppy 
-------
                                                                         DRAFT
                                                                       9/22/93

Inel, Y. and M. Atalay. 1981. Biological activity of simple CS-hydrocarbons on

crayfish Astacus leptodactvlus and correlation with physicochemical

parameters. Bogazici Univ. Dergisi, Kim. 8-9:27-43.



Juhnke, I. and D. Ludemann. 1978._ Results of the investigation of 200 chemical

compounds for acute fish toxicity with the golden orfe test. Z. Wasser

Abwasser Forsch. 11:161-164.



Kasschau, M.R., M.M. Skaggs and E.C.M. Chen. 1980. Accumulation of glutamate

in sea anemones exposed to heavy metals and organic amines. Bull. Environ.

Contam. Toxicol. 25:873-878.



Kirk-Othmer. 1982. Encyclopedia of chemical technology. Third ed. Vol. 2.

Wiley, New York, N.Y.



Koch, R. 1986. On the characterization of the danger potential of water

pollutants. Acta. Hydrochim. Hydrobiol. 14:527-537.



Kuhn, R. and J.H. Canton. 1979. Results of hydrobiological toxicity tests with

micro- and macroorganisms of the biological spectra. In: Reinhalt Wasser.

Aurand, K. and J. Spaander  (Eds.). Inst. Wasser-Boden, Germany, pp. 58-68.



Kwasniewska, K. and K.L. Kaiser. 1984. Toxicities of selected chloroanilines

to four strains of yeast. In: QSAR in environmental toxicology. Kaiser, K.L.

(Ed.). D. Reidel Publ. Co., Dordrecht, pp. 223-233.



Lakhnova, V.A. 1975. Effect of aniline on Daphnia magna Straus. Tr. Sarat.

Otd. Cos. Nauchno-Issled Inst. Ozern. Rechn. Rybn. Khoz. 13:102-104.



Lallier, M.R.  1971. Inhibition par 1'aniline et des derives de substitution de

1'aniline de la stabilisation de la membrane de fecondation chez  1'oeuf de
                                      42

-------
                                                                         DRAFT
                                                                       9/22/93
1'Oursin Paracentrotus lividus. C.R. Acad. Sc. Paris 273:1524-1526.
Lee, v.-z., F.A. Leighton, D.B. Peakall, R.J. Norstrom, P.J. O'Brien, J.F.
Payne and A.D. Rahimtula. 1985. Effects of ingestion of Hibernia and Prudhoe
Bay crude oils on hepatic and renal mixed function oxidase in nestling herring
gulls (Larus aroentatusK Environ. Res. 36:248-255.

Lindstrom-Seppa, L., J. Koivusaari and O. Hanninen. 1983. Metabolism of
foreign compounds in freshwater crayfish (Astacus astacus Jj.) tissues. Aquat.
Toxicol. 3:35-46.

Loeb, H.A. and W.H. Kelly. 1963. Acute oral toxicity of 1,496 chemicals
force-fed to carp. Special Scientific Report-Fisheries No. 471. U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, Washington, D.C.
                                                                             }
Lu, P.Y. and R.L. Metcalf. 1975. Environmental fate and biodegradability of
benzene derivatives as studied in a model aquatic ecosystem. Environ. Health
Perspect. 10:269-284.

Lyons, C.D., S.E. Katz and R. Bartha. 1984. Mechanisms and pathways of aniline
elimination from aquatic environments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 48:491-496.

Lyons, C.D., S.E. Katz and R. Bartha. 1985. Persistence and  mutagenic
potential for herbicide-drived aniline residues in pond water. Bull. Environ.
Contain. Toxicol 35:696-703.

Lysak, A. and J. Marcinek. 1972. Multiple toxic effects of simultaneous action
of some chemical substances on fish. Rocz. Nauk Roln. Ser. H. 94:53-63.

Maemura, S. and T. Omura. 1983. Drug-oxidizing mono-oxygenase system in liver
microsomes of goldfish (Carassius auratusl. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 76C:45-51.
                                      43

-------
                                                                         DRAFT
                                                                       9/22/93

HcLeese, D.W.,  V. Zitko and M.R. Peterson. 1979. Structure-lethality

relationships for phenols, anilines, and other aromatic compounds in shrimp

and clams. Chemosphere 2:53-57.



Mukai, H. 1977. Effects of chemical pretreatment on the germination of

statoblasts of the freshwater bryozoan, Pectinatella oelatinosa. Biol. Zbl.

96:19-31.



Newsome, L.D.,  R.L. Lipnick and D.E. Johnson. 1984. Validation of fish

toxicity QSARs for certain non-reactive non-electrolyte organic compounds. In:

QSAR in environmental toxicology. Kaiser, K.L.E. (Ed.). D. Reidel Publ. Co.,

Dordrecht, pp.  279-299.



Norberg-King, T.J. 1987. U.S. EPA, Duluth, UN.  (Memorandum to C. Stephan, U.S.

EPA, Duluth, MN., August 31).                                                .



Pawlaczyk-Szpilowa, M., M. Moskal and J. Weretelnik. 1972. The usefulness of

biological tests for determining the toxicity of some chemical compounds in

waters. Acta Hydrobiol. 14s115-127.



Pedersen, M.G., W.K. Hershberger, P.K. Zachariah and M.R. Juchau. 1976.

Hepatic biotransformation of environmental xenobiotics in six strains of

rainbow trout  (Salmo gairdneri.). J. Fish. Res.  Board Can. 33:666-675.

Persson, P.E.  1984. Uptake and  release of environmentally occurring odorous

compounds by fish. A review. Water Res.  18:1263-1271.



Puzikova, N.B. and V.N. Markin.  1975. Effect of aniline and  aniline

hydrochloride  on the larvae of  Chironoumus dorsalis Meig. Tr. Sarat.  Otd. Cos.

Nauchno-Issled Inst. Ozern. Rechn. Rybn.  Khoz.  13:104-109.



Redmond, M.S.  and K.J.  Scott.  1987. Acute toxicity test with aniline.
                                       44

-------
                                                                         DRAFT
                                                                       9/22/93
 (Memorandum to G. Thursby, SAIC, and D. Hansen, U.S. EPA, Narragansett, RI.
September 3).

Russom, C. 1993. U.S. EPA, Duluth, MN.  (Memorandum to R. Spehar, U.S. EPA,
Duluth, MN., June 21)..

Sakai, T., H. Kawatsu and S. Umemura. 1983. Effects of pH and temperature on
mixed-function oxidases in the liver of cultured fish. Bull. Jap. Soc. Sci.
Fish. 49:1839-1842.

Sayk, F. and C. Schmidt. 1986. Algae fluorescence autometer, a computerized
bioassay. Z. Wasser Abwasser Forsch. 19:182-184.

Schultz, T.W. and T.C. Allison. 1979. Toxicity and toxic interaction of
aniline and pyridine. Bull. Environ. Contain. Toxicol. 23:814-819.            »

Schultz, T.W. and B.A. Moulton. 1984. Structure-activity correlations of
selected azaarenes, aromatic amines, and nitroaromatics. In: QSAR in
environmental toxicology. Kaiser, K.L.  (Ed). D. Reidel Publ. Co., Dordrecht,
W. Germany, pp. 337-357.

Schwen, R.J. and G.J. Mannering. 1982. Hepatic cytochrome P-450-dependent
monooxygenase systems of the trout, frog and snake. I. Components. Comp.
Biochem. Physiol. 718:431-436.

Shelford, V.E. 1917. An experimental study of the effects of gas waste upon
fishes, with especial reference to stream pollution. Bull. 111. St. Lab. Nat.
Hist. 11:381-410.

Shumway, D.L. and J.R. Palensky. 1973. Impairment of the flavor of fish by
water pollutants. EPA-R3-73-010. National Technical Information Service,
                                      45

-------
                                                                         DRAFT
                                                                       9/22/93
Springfield, VA.
Slooff, W. 1982. A comparative study on the short-term effects of 15 chemicals
on  freshwater.organisms of different trophic  levels. PB83-200386. National
Technical information Service, Springfield, VA.

Slooff, W. 1983. Benthic macroinvertebrates and water quality assessment: Some
toxicological considerations. Aquat. Toxicol. 4:73-82.

Slooff, W. and R. Baerselman. 1980. Comparison of the usefulness of the
mexican axolotl  (Ambvstoma mexicanum) and the clawed toad  (Xenopus laevis)  in
toxicological bioassays. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 24:439-443.

Slooff, W., J.H. Canton and J.L.  Hermens. 1983. Comparison of the
susceptibility of 22 freshwater  species to 15 chemical compounds. I.  (Sub)
acute toxicity tests. Aquat. Toxicol. 4:113-128.

Sollmann, T.  1949. Correlation of the aquarium goldfish toxicities of  some
phenols, quinones, and other benzene derivitives with their  inhibition of
.autooxidative reactions. J. Gen.  Physiol. 32:671-679.

Spehar, R.L.  1987. U.S. EPA, Duluth, MN.  (Memorandum to C. Stephan, U.S. EPA,
Duluth, MN. June 24).

Stephan, C.E., D.I. Mount, D.J.  Hansen, J.H.  Gentile, G.A. Chapman and W.A.
Brungs. 1985. Guidelines for deriving numerical national water  quality
criteria for  the protection of aquatic  organisms and their uses.  PB85-227049.
National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA.

Thursby, G.B. and W.J. Berry. 1987a. Acute toxicity of aniline  to saltwater
animals.  (Memorandum to D.J. Hansen, U.S. EPA, Narragansett, RI.  October 14).
                                       46

-------
                                                                         DRAFT
                                                                       9/22/93

Thursby, G.B. and W.J. Berry. 1987b. Acute and chronic toxicity of aniline to

Hvsidopsis bahia; flow through. (Memorandum to D.J. Hansen, U.S. EPA,

Narragansett, RI. November 30).



Tonogai, Y., S. Ogawa, Y. Ito and M. Iwaida. 1982. Actual survey on TLM

(median tolerance limit) values of environmental pollutants, especially on

amines, nitrites, aromatic nitrogen compounds and artificial dyes. J. Toxicol.

Sci. 7:193-203.



U.S. EPA. 1983a. Water quality standards regulation. Fed. Regist.

48:51400-51413. November 8.



U.S. EPA. 1983b. Water quality standards handbook. Office of Water Regulations

and Standards, Washington, DC.                                               .



U.S. EPA. 1985. Appendix B-Response to public comments on "Guidelines for

deriving numerical national water quality criteria for the protection of

aquatic organisms and their uses." Fed. Regist. 50:30793-30796. July 29.



U.S. EPA. 1986. Chapter 1-Stream design flow for steady-state modeling. In:

Book VI-Design conditions. In: Technical guidance manual for performing waste

load allocation. Office of Water, Washington, DC. August.



U.S. EPA. 1987. Permit writer's guide to water quality-based permitting for

toxic pollutants. EPA-440/4-87-005. Office of Water, Washington, DC.



U.S. EPA. 1991. Technical support document for water quality-based toxics

control. Office of Water, Washington, DC, March.  EPA 505/2-90-001 or PB 91-

127415, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA.



Verschueren, K. 1977. Handbook of environmental data on organic chemicals. Van
                                      47

-------
                                                                         DRAFT
                                                                       9/22/93
Nostrand Reinhold Co. New York, NY.
Vighi, M. and D. Calamari. 1987. A triparametric equation to describe QSARs

for heterogeneous chemical substances. Chemosphere 16:1043-1051.



Wellens, H. 1982. Comparison of the sensitivity of Brachvdanio rerio and

Leuciscus idus by testing the fish toxicity of chemicals and wastewaters. Z.

Wasser Abwasser Forsch. 15:49-52.



Winters, K., C. Van Baalen and J.A.C. Nichol. 1977. Water soluble extractives

from petroleum oils: Chemical characterization and effects on microalgae and

marine animals. Rapp. P.-v. Reun. Cons. Int. Explor. Her. 171:166-174.



Yoshioka, Y., T. Mizuno, Y. Ose and T. Sato. 1986a. The estimation for

toxicity of chemicals on fish by physio-chemical properties. Chemosphere

15:195-203.



Yoshioka, Y., Y. Ose and T. Sato. 1986b. Correlation of the five test methods

to assess chemical toxicity and relation to physical properties. Ecotoxicol.

Environ. Safety 12:15-21.



Yount, J.D. and L.J. Shannon. 1987. Effects of aniline and three derivatives

on laboratory microecosystems. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 6:463-468.
                                       48

-------

-------