United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Office Of Water
(EN-338)
EPA831B-93-O02a
August 1993
Preparing Sewage Sludge
For Land Application Or
Surface Disposal

A Guide for Preparers of Sewage Sludge
on the Monitoring, Record Keeping, and
Reporting Requirements of the Federal
Standards for the Use or Disposal of
Sewage Sludge, 40 CFR Part 503
                   Recycled/Recyclable
                   Printed on paperthat contains
                   at least 50% recycled fiber

-------
General questions concerning the
Standards for the Use and Disposal of
Sewage Sludge should be directed to the
EPA Regional Sludge Coordinator. The
Sludge Coordinators can be reached by
calling the following numbers:
Region 1
Region 2
Region 3
Region 4
Regions
Region 6
Region 7
Region 8
Region 9
Region 10
Boston, MA
New York, NY
Philadelphia, PA
Atlanta, GA
Chicago, IL
Dallas, TX
Kansas City, KS
Denver, CO
San Francisco, CA
Seattle, WA
(617)565-3560
(212)264-5677
(215)597-9078
(404) 347-2391
(312)353-2106
(214)655-7520
(913)551-7443
(303)293-1627
(415)744-1910
(206)553-1728
                                                                               REGION 1
                                                                     MfiJ-07
 Mail compliance reports required under the Standards for the Use and Disposal of Sewage Sludge to
 the Water Compliance Branch Chief in your EPA Region at the address listed on the back cover.

-------
                              TABLE OF CONTENTS
 1. INTRODUCTION	                 l
     1.1 Definition of Person Who Prepares Sewage Sludge	     3
     1.2 Responsibilities of Preparers of Sewage Sludge	'.'.'.'/.   3

 2. MONITORING	         7
    2.1 Regulated Parameters (or what to monitor)	       7
    2.2 Monitoring Frequency (or when to monitor)	  n
    2.3 Procedures for Sampling and Analysis (or how to monitor)	  . . . .  13

 3. RECORDKEEPING	        17
    3.1 Records of Pollutant Concentrations	          17
    3.2 Records of Pathogen Reduction	   18
    3.3 Records of Vector Attraction Reduction	'm   27

 4. NOTIFICATION AND REPORTING	   33
    4.1 Notice and Necessary Information	           33
    4.2 Notice of Interstate Transport	        35
    4.3 Annual Reports	        	   35

 REFERENCES  	    38


                                  APPENDICES

 APPENDIX A - WORKSHEET FOR CALCULATING THE ANNUAL WHOLE SLUDGE
              APPLICATION RATE TO MEET THE ANNUAL POLLUTANT LOADING
              RATE

 APPENDIX B -  SAMPLE FORMAT PROVIDING NOTICE AND NECESSARY INFORMATION

 APPENDIX C -  EQUATIONS FOR CONVERTING SLUDGE VOLUME TO METRIC TONS

 APPENDIX D -  CERTIFICATION STATEMENT
                               LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1   Sludge Quality Requirements for Use or Disposal Practices  	   4

Figure 2   Expressing Pollutant Concentrations on a Dry Weight Basis	   9

Figure 3   Pathogen Reduction Alternative A3—Analysis and Operation 	  24

-------
                                    LIST OF TABLES

Table 1     Compliance Deadlines for 40 CFR Part 503	    2

Table 2     Pollutants Monitored for Land Application and Surface Disposal  	    8

Table 3     Indicator Organisms and Pathogens Monitored Under 40 CFR Part 503	   10

Table 4     Monitoring Frequency  	

Table 5     Methods for the Analysis of Metals in Sewage Sludge	   15

Table 6     Recordkeeping Requirements for Class A Pathogen Reduction Alternatives	  19

Table 7     Recordkeeping Requirements for Class B Pathogen Reduction Alternatives	  20

Table 8     Recordkeeping Requirements for Vector Attraction Reduction Sludge
           Processing Options  	   28
                                              u

-------
  Section One	^	Introduction
                                    1.  INTRODUCTION

  Under the authority  of Section 405(d) of the Clean Water Act as amended, the U.S.  Environmental
  Protection Agency (EPA) has promulgated, at 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 503, Phase
  I of the risk-based regulations that govern the final use or disposal of sewage sludge. The intent of this
  Federal program is to ensure that the use or disposal of sewage sludge occurs in a way that protects both
  human health and the environment. The Part 503 regulation establishes general requirements, pollutant
  limits, operational standards, and management practices, as well  as  monitoring, recordkeeping, and
  reporting  requirements. These requirements apply to sewage sludge that is land applied, placed  on a
  surface disposal site, or incinerated in a sewage sludge only incinerator.  The following types of sludge
  are not subject to Part 503 but are regulated under other Federal rules:

       •    Sludge generated from the treatment of industrial process waste at an industrial facility (40
           CFR Part 257 if non-hazardous)
       •    Hazardous sewage sludge (40 CFR Parts 264, 265, 267 and 268)
       •    Sewage sludge with a polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB) concentration of 50 ppm or greater (40
           CFR Part 761)
       •   Drinking water treatment sludge (40  CFR Part 257).

 Part 503 imposes requirements  on four groups:

      •   Persons who prepare  sewage sludge or material derived from sewage sludge
      •   Land appliers of sewage sludge
      •   Owners/operators of sewage sludge surface disposal sites
      •   Owners/operators of sewage sludge incinerators.

 The regulation is largely self-implementing. This means that anyone engaged hi activities covered by  this
 regulation must comply with the appropriate requirements on or before the compliance deadlines (see
 Table  1). A person who violates Part 503 is subject to administrative, civil, and/or criminal enforcement
 actions.

EPA recognizes that implementation of Part 503 requirements may be a source of confusion for those
who already have a State or local permit with sewage sludge requirements because these people now have

-------
Introduction	.	.	   Section One
                                             Table 1
                           Compliance Deadlines for 40 CFR Part 503
'^M^^^^^W^^^^^HsSK^^^^^^^^^^^
Monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements
All other requirements (i.e., general requirements,
pollutant limits, pathogen reduction, vector attraction
reduction, and management practices)

July 20, 1993
February 19, 1994*
   *If compliance requires construction of new pollution control facilities, the compliance deadline is extended to February 19,
   1995   A new pollution control facility is any building, structure, facility, or installation from which there is or may be a
   discharge of pollutants, the construction of which began after the promulgation of Part 503, and includes any building,
   structure facility, or installation that replaces or substantially upgrades the process or production equipment necessary to
   meet a standard under this Part. The definition of new pollution control facility does not include:  (1) replacement of any
   building, structure,  facility, or installation due to normal operational wear and tear; and <2)  installation of monitoring
   equipment or devices, including the purchase of computer hardware or software for monitoring purposes.
 to comply with two sets of requirements-those in their permit and those in Part 503.  To reduce some
 of this confusion, EPA developed a series of guidance documents to explain the requirements of Part 503.
 A list of these documents is provided in the references section at the end of this document.

 This particular document focuses on the monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements that apply
 to persons who prepare sewage sludge or a material derived from sewage sludge.  The remainder of this
 introduction defines  persons who  prepare  sewage  sludge  and  then  summarizes  their  general
 responsibilities. The introduction is followed by three sections that detail the monitoring, recordkeeping,
 and notification and reporting requirements, respectively.

 Separate documents explaining the monitoring, record  keeping,  and reporting responsibilities of land
 appliers and owners/operators of surface disposal sites are also available. The following documents may
 be obtained through the  EPA regional offices listed on the back cover of this document:

       •   Land Application of Sewage Sludge - A Guide for Land Appliers on the Recordkeeping and
           Reporting Requirements of the Federal Standards for the Use and Disposal of Sewage Sludge
           Management in 40 CFR Part 503 (EPA, 1993)
       •   Surface Disposal of Sewage Sludge -  A Guide for Owners/Operators of Surface Disposal
           Facilities on  the Monitoring,  Recordkeeping, and Reporting Requirements of the Federal
           Standards for the Use and Disposal of Sewage Sludge in 40 CFR Pan 503 (EPA, 1993).

-------
 S*<*i°»0»*	m	Introduction
 1.1 Definition of Person Who Prepares Sewage Sludge
 The regulation defines the person who prepares sewage sludge as "either the person who generates sewage
 sludge during the treatment of domestic sewage in a treatment works or the person who derives a material
 from sewage sludge."  This definition covers two types of operations—those that generate sewage sludge
 and those that take sewage sludge after it has  been generated and blend or  mix it with another material
 to further process or prepare it before its ultimate use or disposal.  Operations that generate sewage
 sludge include publicly owned treatment works, privately owned treatment works, and federally owned
 treatment works that treat, recycle, or reclaim either domestic sewage or a combination of domestic
 sewage and industrial waste.  Operations that  derive a material from sewage sludge include composting
 facilities and fertilizer blending facilities that  change the initial quality of the sewage sludge and create
 a product for use as a soil amendment or fertilizer. Any time the sludge quality (pollutant concentrations,
 pathogen levels, or vector attraction characteristics) is changed, the person responsible for the change is
 defined as a person who prepares sewage sludge.  For example, any sludge management facility, such
 as regional composting operation, that mixes or blends sewage sludge received from other facilities is a
 preparer.
    Stowage Sludge—Solid, semi^olid, or lit$M residue generated duilag the treatment
    sewage at a treatment works. Sewage siadge Iselades bat is not liiaited to:
         *  Domestic sep^tge (radiwlinf septage toia portabte Joiete)
         *  «**»** or solids removed la primary, seeoadary* or advanced wastewater
                  f**^*/
         *  A saaterM derived from sewage sludge.
   Sewage sludge does not Include;
        *  Ash generated ia a sewage $Wge Incinerator
        *  Grit and screenings generated during jjrelimfaary treatment of domestic sewage ia a
            treatment works*
1.2 Responsibilities of Preparers of Sewage Sludge
The person who prepares the sewage sludge is responsible for documenting sludge quality. The quality
of the sludge affects the final use or disposal practices available.  As illustrated in Figure 1, the sludge
quality requirements differ within a use or disposal practice.  For example, under surface disposal, the
sludge quality limits are affected by whether or not the active sewage sludge unit has  a liner and leachate

-------
Introduction
                                                                                        Section One
     Final Use or
      Disposal
Pathogen
Reduction
 Vector
Attraction
Reduction
                                                                       Pollutant Limits
-,,;„,- ^^ AH*! - ^^ Options ^^
LAND APPLICATION
Bulk sewage
sludge applied
to:


Class A


Any of vector
options 1-8


» Lawn or home garden
Sell or give
away in bag or
other container
Bulk sewage
sludge applied
to:




ClassA
Class AorB




Any of vector
options 1-8
Any of vector
options J-10
— te--



Limits — Table 3 of §503.13
Pollutant
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
Selenium
Zinc
Monthly Avg.
(mg/kg)
41
39
1200
1500
300
17
18
420
36
2800
Ceiling Concentration
Limits — Table I of §503.13
Pollutant
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
Selenium
Zinc
Maximum
(mg/kg)
75
85
3000
4300
840
57
75
420
100
7500
Ceiling concentration limits and annual pollutant loading
rate OR ceiling concentration limits and pollutant
concentration limits
Ceiling c

oncentratioa limits and cumulative pollutant 1
e OR ceiling concentration limits and pollutant 1
concentration limits 1
     • Agricultural land, including pasture
     • Forest land
* Reclamation site
SURFACE DISPOSAL
Unlined
sewage sludge
unit

Sewage sludge
unit with
liner/leachate
collection



ClassAorBor
daily cover

ClassAorBor
daily cover



Any of vector
options 1-11
— fc-

•Sire specific limits may be
approved by the permitting
authority, if requested.
Any of vector
options 1-11


Unit Boundary to
Property Line
Distance in Meters
Oto<25
25to<50
50to<75
75to<100
100 to < 125
125 to < 150
150 and greater
Pollutant Concentrations*
Arsenic
mg/kg
30
34
39
46
53
62
73
Chromium
mg/kg
30
34
39
46
53
62
73
Nickel
mg/kg
30
34
39
46
53
62
73
No pollutant limits
     INCINERATION
Sewage sludge
incinerator


None


None
— fc--

She specific pollutant limits 1
     CO-DISPOSAL WITH MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE
Municiapl
solid waste
landfill


None


None
•»

* Demonstrate non- 1
No pollutant limits, but must: hazardous using TCLP 1
- Perform paint filter test 1
                 Figure 1: Sludge Quality Requirements for Use or Disposal Practices
                                                                                               64642

-------
 Section One        	        Introduction
 collection system. The preparer must know what the final use or disposal practice will be and document
 that the sludge quality meets the appropriate requirements.

 EPA anticipates that most preparers generating sewage sludge are able to control the type and amount
 of pollutants that ultimately end up in the sludge through implementation of local mechanisms, such as
 pretreatment programs.   Therefore, the Part 503 regulation requires the preparer to evaluate sludge
 quality, maintain  records,  submit compliance reports,  and distribute  sludge quality information to
 subsequent users who need the information to comply with the other requirements of the sewage sludge
 regulation.  Subsequent users may include:

      •   Sludge processors, such  as  fertilizer blenders,  composting  operations, and  pelletization
          facilities, that further prepare the sludge and either land apply it themselves or distribute it for
          land application
      •   Land appliers
      •   Owners or operators of surface disposal facilities
      •   Owners or operators of sewage sludge incinerators.

 These subsequent users  will usually rely  on the preparer to provide them  with the sludge quality
 information necessary to comply with the requirements of the regulation.    However, there are several
 circumstances where the subsequent users will perform sludge monitoring in addition to or instead of the
 initial preparer.  Sometimes the preparer generating the sewage sludge transfers it to a processing facility
 where it is prepared for land application.  It is possible that the preparer generating the sludge and the
 preparer processing the sludge may enter into an agreement stipulating that the preparer processing the
 sewage sludge will be responsible for some or all of the monitoring requirements instead of the preparer
 generating the sludge.  When sewage sludge is placed on an active surface disposal unit fewer than 150
 meters from the site property line, then the owner/operator of the site is responsible for monitoring sludge
 quality instead of the preparer. Finally, regional incinerator that accepts sludge from numerous preparers
 may choose to monitor the combined sludge fed into the incinerator to verify that the mixture meets the
 sludge quality limits.

If a subsequent user derives a material from the sewage sludge, then that user is a preparer by definition,
as described in the previous section. The subsequent user/preparer who changes the quality of the sludge
is required to independently evaluate the final sewage sludge product and keep records documenting
sludge quality. However,  if the original sewage sludge meets the criteria for exceptional quality sewage

-------
Introduction
Section One
sludge (see box given below), then additional monitoring is not required as long as records document the

receipt of exceptional quality sewage sludge.
   Exceptional Quality Stowage Sludge— Sewage sludge or material derived firom sewage sludge
   classified as exeeptieaaf qsalily If i* meets &e foitewii^ criteria;
                                   pollutant concentrations [40 CFR 503. 13(bX3)]
        *   One of the Class A pathogen reduction alternatives [40 CFR 503.32(a)]
        *   One of the vector attraction reduction options accomplished during sludge treatment
                    1-$ £40 CFR

-------
 Section Two	^	Monitoring
                                    2.  MONITORING

 Monitoring sewage sludge quality is a key step to ensuring compliance with the Part 503 requirements.
 Most preparers must establish a self-monitoring program to document that sludge quality levels are met
 consistently. The following materials contain detailed guidance on the collection and analysis of sewage
 sludge samples:

      •   POTW Sludge Sampling and Analysis Guidance Document (EPA, 1989 and updates)
      •   Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater,  18th edition  (APHA,  1992)
      •   Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste Physical/Chemical Methods, EPA Publication SW-846
          (EPA, 1986)
      •   Environmental Regulations and Technology: Control of Pathogens and  Vectors in Sewage
          Sludge, EPA/625/R-92/013 (EPA, 1992)
      •   Sewage Sludge Sampling Techniques.  Demonstration Video (EPA,  1993).

 2.1  Regulated Parameters  (or what to monitor)
 Regulated parameters include inorganic pollutants (i.e., metals), pathogenic and non-pathogenic indicator
 organisms, and vector attraction characteristics.  The specific parameters to monitor vary depending on
 whether the sludge is land applied, incinerated, or placed on a surface disposal site. The parameters also
 vary depending on which pathogen reduction alternative or vector attraction reduction option is used.

 Sludge that is land applied or placed on an unlined surface disposal site must be monitored for inorganic
pollutants.  The sludge must also be monitored for pathogens, indicator organisms, and vector attraction
characteristics when called for by the pathogen reduction alternative or vector attraction reduction option.
Sludge does not have to meet pollutant limits when it is placed on a surface disposal site that is equipped
with a liner and leachate collection system, but it must meet pathogen and vector attraction reduction
requirements.  Note that sludge placed  on  a surface disposal site does not have  to meet pathogen
reduction requirements if it is covered with soil or other suitable material after placement.  Sludge that
is incinerated only has to be analyzed for inorganic pollutants.

-------
Monitoring
                                                                                   Section Two
                                                                                   organism
                        ^l^^^^^^^@^

Pollutants
The presence of inorganic pollutants in sludge is the first component of sludge quality. Table 2 lists the
inorganic pollutants regulated under 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 503 for land application
or surface disposal (unlined units). At a minimum, sludge must be monitored for these pollutants. The
preparer may have to monitor the sewage sludge for additional pollutants if specified  in a permit or
required by the person(s) responsible for the ultimate use or disposal of the sludge.  When bulk sewage
is going to be land applied, nitrogen analysis must also be conducted.
                                            Table 2
                 Pollutants Monitored for Land Application and Surface Disposal

Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
Selenium
Zinc
l!^i|itj:iiipHollll
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
^
^^M^y^fS^^
i^ii^piiiii^iiiilliiiii


/




/


 The pollutant limits are expressed as dry weight concentrations. Therefore, in addition to the pollutants,
 the percent solids content of the sludge must be determined to verify compliance with pollutant limits.

-------
 Section Two       	^	Monitoring
 The percent solids value is used to convert pollutant concentrations to a dry weight basis, as demonstrated
 in Figure 2.
     If you assume that the specific gravity of the solids is equivalent to the specific gravity of water,
     a simplified equation can be used to express the concentration of a pollutant on a dry weight
     basis:
                                  A ^ + Percent Solids = B
                                                             kg
     where:   A is the concentration of the pollutant hi the sewage sludge on a wet basis in mg/L and
              B is the concentration of the pollutant hi the sewage sludge on a dry weight basis hi
              mg/kg.
     For example, assume that the concentration of zinc hi the sewage sludge is reported as 200 mg/L
     and the percent solids content of the sewage sludge is 24 percent.  The concentration can be
     converted to a dry weight basis using the equation given above:
                                   200 ^£ - 0.24 = 8334 ^
                                         L                 kg

             Figure 2:  Expressing Pollutant Concentrations on a Dry Weigjit Basis
 Pathogenic Organisms
 The presence of pathogenic organisms, such as bacteria and viruses, is another component of sludge
 quality.  When sludge is prepared for land application or surface disposal, it must comply with applicable
 pathogen reduction requirements. There are no pathogen reduction requirements for sewage sludge that
 is incinerated.

 The Part 503 regulation allows nine pathogen reduction alternatives, which are divided into two distinct
 classes:  Class A and Class B. Class A alternatives produce a sludge that is virtually pathogen free (see
 Table 3 for allowable levels). Class B alternatives, while not as effective as Class A, significantly reduce
 the pathogen level in sludge. Both Class A and B alternatives specify maximum levels of fecal coliform,
 Salmonella sp. bacteria, enteric viruses, and/or helminth ova allowed hi the sludge.  Most alternatives
 also specify operating parameters  that must be consistently achieved  during sludge treatment.   The
operating parameters are described in Section 3.2 (Records of Pathogen Reduction) because records must
be kept to demonstrate that the operating parameters were met on a regular basis. The remainder of this

-------
Monitoring
                                                                                Section Two
section addresses monitoring for the presence of fecal coliform, Salmonella sp. bacteria, enteric viruses,
and viable helminth ova.
                                          Table 3
                     Indicator Organisms and Pathogens Monitored Under
                                      40 CFR Part 503
^^^H^ffHSi^S
All Class A Alternatives
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

All Class A Alternatives
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

Class A Alternatives
3 and 4 only
Class A Alternatives
3 and 4 only
Class B
Alternative 1
Ililiiiiiiiiialillli
Fecal Colifonn

Salmonella sp.
bacteria (in lieu of
fecal coliform)
Enteric Viruses
Viable Helminth
Ova
Fecal Coliform

1,000 Most Probable Number (MPN) per
gram (Class A) of total solids (dry
weight)
3 MPN per 4 grams total solids (dry
weight)

Less than one plaque-forming unit per 4
grams total solids (dry weight)
Less than one viable helminth ovum per 4
grams of total solids (dry weight)
Less than 2 x l(f MPN or less than 2 x
106 colony-forming units per gram of
total solids (dry weight) (expressed as
geometric mean of the results of 7
individual samples)
 All  of the Class A and one of the Class  B pathogen reduction alternatives  require monitoring to
 demonstrate that the density of pathogens or indicator organisms hi the sewage sludge is below specified
 values. Depending on which pathogen reduction alternative is used, the preparer may need to monitor
 for one or more of the following organisms: fecal coliform, Salmonella sp. bacteria, enteric viruses, and
 viable helminth ova. Table 3 describes which organisms must be monitored for each alternative requiring
 analysis.  Note that allowable pathogen levels also are expressed as dry weight.

 Vector Attraction Characteristics
 Vector attraction characteristics are the thud basic component of sludge quality. Vectors are animals and
 insects (e.g., rodents, flies, birds) that could potentially transmit pathogenic organisms from the sewage
 sludge to humans.  Vectors may be attracted to sludge by its odor and putrescibility. Therefore, these
 characteristics must be reduced by using any of the  11 options given in the  regulations.
                                              10

-------
Section Two	Monitoring
The types of parameters used to demonstrate vector attraction reduction include volatile solids reduction,
specific oxygen uptake rate, and percent total solids.  Most of the vector attraction reduction alternatives
also involve the documentation of operating parameters and evaluation of sludge management activities
to demonstrate compliance. Facilities are required to maintain records describing the methods used and
certifying that requirements for vector attraction reduction have been met.  Section 3.3 describes the
specific types of records that must be kept to demonstrate compliance.

2.2  Monitoring Frequency (or when to monitor)
The Part 503 regulations establish a monitoring frequency for sewage sludge and materials derived from
sewage sludge.  As shown in Table 4, the monitoring frequency increases as the amount of sludge used
or disposed increases. The monitoring frequency established by the regulation does not restrict preparers
from analyzing  sludge quality more often.   In fact,  more frequent sampling and analysis may be
advantageous. The results of each sampling event represent the sludge quality from the date the sample
was taken until the date of the next sample. If a preparer  samples quarterly and the results show that the
sludge quality exceeded a limit, then all the sludge used or disposed after that sample was collected will
be in violation until another sample is collected and  analyzed to show that the sludge is in compliance.
Thus, preparers who collect samples of sludge more  frequently may be able to document that in general
the sludge quality consistently meets applicable requirements and that exceedances, if any, are abnormal
events.
                                           Table 4
                                    Monitoring Frequency
Amount of Sewage Sludge Used or Disposed
(metric tons per 365-day period; dry weight)
Greater than zero but less than 290
Equal to or greater than 290 but less than 1,500
Equal to or greater than 1,500 but less than 15,000
Equal to or greater than 15,000
Monitoring Frequency
FterYear
Once
Quarterly (4 times)
Bimonthly (6 times)
Monthly (12 times)
Technically, sludge does not exceed use or disposal requirements until it is used or disposed.  A preparer
can prevent a violation from occurring by waiting for the analytical results before releasing the sludge
for use or disposal.  The concentrations of the regulated parameters (i.e., pollutants and pathogens)
                                              11

-------
Monitoring	Section Two
remain fairly constant once the sludge has been prepared for final use or disposal, with the exception of
fecal coliform and Salmonella sp. bacteria. Therefore, after a reasonable waiting period (of 3-7 weeks),
the analytical results of the sludge sampled should still reflect the quality of the sludge used or disposed.

Obviously, a preparer's  ability to use this strategy will  depend on the availability of space to store the
sewage  sludge in a manner that will protect it from contamination.  Where storage is not a feasible
alternative, preparers will have to be more conservative in how they use or dispose of the sludge until
they have generated enough historical monitoring data to demonstrate that the sludge consistently meets
sludge quality requirements.  Until preparers are confident they can consistently achieve Class A, they
may want to manage sludge as if it is Class B.

The  Part 503 regulation specifies the number of sampling events that must occur during  a year. The
interval between  sampling events is also defined.  For example, the monitoring frequency "once per
quarter  (4 times per year)" means a total of four sampling events must occur at 3-month intervals (i.e.,
one sampling event every 3 months). The four sampling events cannot occur hi 4 consecutive days (or
weeks or months) if the preparer is continuously using or disposing of sludge for 365 days. There may
be individual situations where the interval stipulated by the regulation (e.g., once every 60 days) can be
modified.

For example, sewage sludge may be prepared at a faster rate than the preparer uses or disposes of the
sludge.  It is possible for a facility to prepare, over a 12-month period, an amount of sewage sludge that
requires bimonthly sampling and analysis (e.g., 3,000 dry metric tons).  The facility may, however, only
land apply the sludge during a 3-month period because of the local growing season.  In this situation, the
preparer may  sample and analyze the  sewage sludge on a bimonthly (every 2 months) basis for all
applicable parameters that remain fairly constant in the  sludge after it has been processed and prepared
for final use or disposal (i.e., metals,  enteric viruses,  viable helminth ova). However, because fecal
coliform and Salmonella are prone to regrowth, analysis for these parameters must be performed during
the 3-month period that the sewage sludge is land applied.  The preparer should perform biweekly (every
2 weeks) monitoring during that period to comply with the monitoring frequency (six times per year) and
the timing restriction (at the time of use or disposal).

For most treatment works treating domestic sewage,  monitoring events should be performed at regular
intervals throughout the year as the sludge is being prepared rather than after it has been stockpiled or
otherwise stored.  Regular monitoring gives the preparer timely feedback on changes in sludge quality,
                                               12

-------
 Section Two	Monitoring
 thereby allowing the preparer to identify and correct problems early. However, if the sludge quality is
 likely to change between the time it is prepared and the time it is used or disposed, then the monitoring
 events should be scheduled so that the data are representative of the sludge that is ultimately used or
 disposed.  For example, if a sludge with a high liquid content is stored in a tank or lagoon, it is likely
 to produce a leachate or supernatant that will be drawn off the sludge solids as they settle.  This could
 result in increased concentrations of pollutants in the sludge since the metals bind more readily to the
 solids than the liquid fraction of the sludge.  The  monitoring events should be scheduled to collect
 representative samples of the sludge used or disposed at a frequency appropriate for the amount of sludge
 used or disposed during the calendar year.

 Another situation requiring possible modification of the monitoring interval is when the preparer has been
 stockpiling sludge for an extended period of time and, now that the regulations are in effect, needs to start
 sampling as the sludge is used or disposed.  In this case, the preparer should determine how much sludge
 will be used or disposed in a 365-day period and calculate the corresponding monitoring frequency.  The
 preparer should schedule sampling events at evenly spaced intervals during the time when sludge is used
 or disposed.

 2.3 Procedures for Sampling and Analysis (or how to monitor)
 This section describes three critical factors in the development and implementation of a self-monitoring
 program that will produce precise and reliable analytical results:

     •   Collection of representative samples of the sewage sludge
     •   Use of appropriate analytical techniques
     •   Adherence to quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) procedures for sampling and analysis.

Representative Samples
To obtain a valid sample of sewage sludge, the sample must be taken from the correct location, represent
the entire amount of sludge, and be handled properly from the time of collection through analysis. It is
important that samples be collected from a location that is representative of the final sewage sludge or
sewage sludge product.   Therefore, sludge samples must  be collected after the last treatment process
(e.g., digestion, dewatering, drying, composting). Samples should be taken at  the same point and in the
same manner each time monitoring is performed.  This location should be safe and accessible.
                                              13

-------
Monitoring       	Section Two
The technique for sampling the sludge will vary depending on whether the sludge is flowing through
pipes, moving along a conveyor, or contained in a truck, pile, or bin.  Sludge that is flowing or moving
should be sampled at equal intervals during the amount of time the unit operates in a day.  This technique
is desk-able because moving sludge is likely to be better mixed than sludge in a pile or bin.  If sludge
samples must be collected from a pile or bin, the appropriate number of sample aliquots to collect from
various points in the  pile should be determined using the statistical procedure described hi the POTW
Sludge Sampling and Analysis Guidance Document (EPA,  1989 and updates). At a minimum, full-core
samples should be taken from at least four points in the pile or bin.  Sludge sampling techniques are
described in the following references, which are available through the  Regional sludge coordinator:

     •   POTW Sludge Sampling and Analysis Guidance  Document (EPA, 1989 and updates)
     •   Environmental Regulations and Technology:  Control of Pathogens and Vectors in Sewage
         Sludge, EPA/1625/R-92/013 (EPA, 1992)
     •   Sewage Sludge Sampling Techniques. Demonstration Video (EPA, 1993).

Appropriate preservation techniques ensure that samples remain representative during the time that are
held prior to analysis.  At a minimum} all sludge samples in the field and in the laboratory should be
preserved by cooling to 4°C.  In  addition to preservation, the holding time influences the validity of
analytical results. It is important to know and respect sample holding times for each parameter being
analyzed.  With the  exception of mercury, the metals do not degrade easily and can be held up to 6
months.  Mercury can be held for  13 days hi a plastic container and 38 days in a glass container.
Bacteria have a very short holding time; if the samples cannot be delivered to the laboratory within 1
hour, they should be chilled promptly (using an ice and water bath) to 4°C and delivered within 24 hours.
Samples for viable helminth ova can be held for up to 1 month if chilled to 4°C.  Viruses can be frozen
for up to 2 weeks.

In addition, appropriate sample containers must be used. For some parameters, such as volatile organics,
glass containers are essential.  However, either plastic or glass containers can be used to collect samples
for the  analysis of metals, indicator organisms, and  pathogens.   The containers must be clean and
contaminant free. Sterile containers must be used for indicator organisms and pathogens.

Finally, sufficient sample  volumes must be collected to  perform the analyses.   The sample volumes
needed for each analysis vary depending on the percent total solids of the sewage sludge and the detection
                                              14

-------
Section Two	^^	Monitoring

level of the analytical method used.  Check with your laboratory to make sure you collect more than

enough sludge for analysis. A conservative rule of thumb is to collect 500 ml for metals analysis and

1 L for pathogens and indicator organisms.


Appropriate Analytical Techniques

All analyses performed to comply with Part 503 must be conducted using methods specified in Part 503.

Pollutant analysis for metals must be performed using  the methods provided in Test Methods for

Evaluating Solid Waste (SW-846) (EPA 1986).  Table 5 lists the methods for the analysis  of regulated

pollutants.   Methods for pathogen analysis, specific oxygen uptake rate, and total, fixed,  and volatile

solids can be found in the following references:
         Enteric Viruses:  Standard Practice for Recovery of Viruses From Wastewater Sludge, Section
         11, Water and Environmental Technology (ASTM, 1992).

         Fecal Coliform: Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, Part 9221
         E or Part 9222 D, 18th edition, (APHA, 1992).

         Helminth Ova:  W.A. Yanko,  Occurrence of Pathogens in Distribution and Marketing
         Municipal Sludges (EPA, 1987).

         Salmonella Sp. Bacteria:  Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater,
         Part 9260 D.I., 18th edition, (APHA, 1992); B.A. Kenner and H.A. Clark, Determination and
         Enumeration  of Salmonella and Pseudomonas aeruginosa,  J. Water Pollution Control
         Federation, 46(9):  2163-2171, 1974.

         Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate:  Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and
         Wastewater, Part 2710 B, 18th edition, (APHA, 1992).

         Total, Fixed, and Volatile Solids:  Standard Methods for the Examination  of Water and
         Wastewater, Part 2540 G, 18th edition, (APHA, 1992).
Qualit  Assurance/lit
QA programs are used to achieve a desired quality for activities, such as sample collection, laboratory

analysis, data validation and reporting, documentation, and recordkeeping. QA programs should address
the following major areas:


     •   Proper sample collection procedures, equipment, preservation methods, and chain-of-custody
         procedures to ensure representative samples

     •   Proper sample preparation procedures, instruments, equipment, and methodologies used for the
         analyses of samples
                                             15

-------
Monitoring
                                                                                        Section Two
                                              Table 5
                       Methods for the Analysis of Metals in Sewage Sludge
i^s^lili^^iWii^^^S^S^it
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
Selenium
Zinc
S^^^ii^l^^i^^li^^^^^FllM
EPA Methods 3050/3051 + 7061
EPA Methods 3050/3051 + 6010/7131/7130
EPA Methods 3050/3051 + 6010/7191/7190
EPA Methods 3050/3051 + 6010/7210
EPA Methods 3050/3051 + 6010/7421/7420
EPA Method 7471/7470
EPA Methods 3050/3051 + 6010/7481/7480
EPA Methods 3050/3051 + 6010/7520
EPA Methods 3050/3051 + 6010/7741/7740
EPA Methods 3050/3051 + 6010/7950
   *Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods, EPA Publication SW-846, Second Edition (1982)
   with Updates I (April 1984) and H (April 1985) and the Third Edition (November 1986) with Revision I (December 1987)
   and Update I (July 1992).  The Second Edition and Updates I and H (PB-87-120-291) are available from the National
   Technical Infoiraation Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161. The Third Edition and Revision I and Update
   I (Document number 955-001-00000-1) are available from the Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office,
   941 North Capitol Street, NE, Washington, DC, 20002.  Future updates will be noticed in the Federal Register.

      •   Proper procedures  and  schedules for the calibration and maintenance of equipment and
          instruments associated with the collection and analyses of samples
      •   Proper recordkeeping to produce accurate and complete records and reports, when required.

 QC,  which is part of the QA program, relates to the routine use of established procedures and policies
 during sample collection and analysis.  The objective of QC procedures is to ultimately control both the
 accuracy and the precision of all  analytical measurements made. QC for sample  collection includes the
 use of duplicate and spiked samples, as well as sample blanks. QC for sample analysis includes the use
 of spiked  and  split samples, proper  calibration protocols, and appropriate  analytical methods and
 procedures.  Guidance on QA/QC for  sample collection and analysis is contained in Chapter 1 of Test
 Methods for Analysis of Solid Waste (SW-846)(EPA, 1986). Each analytical method describes additional
 QC procedures for the specific method.
                                                  16

-------
 Section Three	Recordkeeping
                                  3.  RECORDKEEPING

 Persons who prepare sewage sludge are required to keep records of sludge quality.  With respect to
 pollutants, the  Part  503  regulation requires  the  preparer to maintain records  documenting  the
 concentration of pollutants in the sludge. With respect to pathogens and vector attraction, the records
 must describe how the pathogen and vector attraction reduction requirements were met and include a
 signed certification of their achievement. The regulations specify that records be maintained for a period
 of at least 5 years.

 This section provides guidance to preparers on the specific records needed to document compliance.  The
 records must be kept so that they are readily accessible to State and EPA inspectors. Preparers should
 be aware  that failure to keep adequate records  is a violation of the Part 503 regulations and subject to
 administrative,  civil, and/or criminal penalty under the Clean Water Act.

 3.1  Records of Pollutant Concentrations
 The preparer is responsible for maintaining the following documentation of sampling and analysis for
 pollutant concentrations:

      •    Date  and time of sample collection, sampling location, sample type, sample volume, name of
          sampler, type of sample container, and methods of preservation, including cooling
      •    Date  and time of sample analysis, name of analyst, and analytical methods used
      •    Laboratory bench sheets indicating all raw data used  in the analyses and the  calculation of
          results (unless a contract laboratory performed the analyses for the preparer)
      •    Name of contract laboratory, if applicable.
      •    Sampling and analytical quality assurance/quality control(QA/QC) procedures
      •    Analytical results expressed in dry weight.

When sewage sludge or the material derived from sewage sludge that is going to be land applied does
not meet the pollutant concentration limits hi Table 3 of 40 CFR Part 503.13 (see Figure 1 on page 4),
additional  records must be kept to demonstrate compliance with the pollutant limits in 40 CFR 503.13.
These records must demonstrate compliance with either the cumulative pollutant loading rate or the annual
                                              17

-------
Recordkeeping	Section Three
pollutant loading rate, as appropriate.  If the preparer plans to sell or give away the sewage sludge in a
bag or other container, he or she must develop and retain the following additional records:

     •   Calculation of an annual  whole sludge application rate  (AWSAR) that will not exceed the
         annual pollutant  loading rate in  Table 4 of 40 CFR 503.13 for each regulated pollutant.
         Appendix A of this document provides a worksheet to assist hi calculating the AWSAR. The
         AWSAR must be distributed with the sewage sludge on a label or information sheet.
     •   A copy of the label or information sheet provided to persons who will land apply the sludge.

If the preparer is going to land apply bulk sewage sludge, additional records that track the cumulative
pollutant loading rate for each land application site must be developed and maintained.  The  preparer
should refer to the guidance document for land  appliers  for  detailed  information  on additional
recordkeeping requirements for land appliers.

3.2 Records of Pathogen Reduction
The Part 503 regulation require the maintenance of records that include a description of how compliance
was achieved and a certification that the pathogen requirements were met.  In general, the description
should explain the treatment process for pathogen reduction and be supported by analytical results for
pathogens and  indicator organisms and log books  documenting operational parameters for  sludge
treatment units.  If the sludge is only Class B, the land applier must keep records describing site
restrictions to prevent public exposure to pathogens. The following paragraphs briefly explain each
pathogen reduction alternative and the types of records used to demonstrate compliance.  The Class A
alternatives are designated  Al through A6 and the Class B alternatives are designated Bl through B3.
Table 6 summarizes the recordkeeping requirement for each Class A alternative, and Table 7 covers each
Class B alternative.

Alternative Al—Time and Temperature
Alternative Al  requires that sludge treatment units  be  operated to  maintain  the sludge at a specific
temperature for a specific amount of time.  Both of these parameters are determined using one of the
formulas provided in the regulations.  The appropriate equation used to determine the time-temperature
relationship is based on the percent total solids of the  sewage sludge and on the mechanisms used by the
treatment process to heat the sludge.
                                              18

-------
Section Three
Recordkeeping
                                          Table 6
                          Recordkeeping Requirements for Class A
                              Pathogen Reduction Alternatives
Atternative Al— Time and TemDeratare
• Analytical results for density of Salmonella sp. bacteria or fecal coliform (most probable number)
• Sludge temperature (either continuous chart or two readings per day, at least one per shift)
• Time (days, hours, minutes) temperature maintained
ABeiBi^Ve A2^^aline Treatment
• Analytical results for density of Salmonella sp. bacteria or fecal coliform (most probable number)
• Sludge Ph (beginning, middle, and end of treatment)
• Time (hours) pH maintained above 12 (at least 72 hours)
• Sludge temperature (beginning, middle, and end of treatment and hourly to demonstrate 12 hours above 52°C)
• Percent solids in sludge after drying (at least 50 percent)
Alternative A3— Analysis and Operation
• Analytical results for density of Salmonella sp. bacteria or fecal coliform (most probable number)
• Analytical results for density of enteric viruses (plaque forming unit/4 grams total solids) prior to pathogen
reduction and, when appropriate, after treatment
• Analytical results for density of viable helminth ova (number/4 grams total solids) prior to pathogen reduction
and, when appropriate, after treatment
• Values or ranges of values for operating parameters to indicate consistent pathogen reduction treatment
Alternative A4-~ Analysis Onlv
• Analytical results for density of Salmonella sp. bacteria or fecal coliform (most probable number)
• Analytical results for density of enteric viruses (plaque forming unit/4 grams total solids)
• Analytical results for density of viable helminth ova (number 14 grams total solids)
Alternative A5— Processes to Further Reduce Pathoaens flHRRtt
• Heat Drying
- Analytical results for density of Salmonella sp.
bacteria or fecal coliform (most probable number)
- Moisture content of dried sludge < 10 percent
- Logs documenting temperature of sludge particles
or wet bulb temperature of exit gas exceeding 80 °C
(either continuous chart or two readings per day, at
least one per shift)
• Thermophilic Aerobic Digestion
- Analytical results for density of Salmonella sp.
bacteria or fecal coliform (most probable number)
- Dissolved oxygen concentration in digester S I
mg/L
- Logs documenting temperature maintained at 55-
60rC for 10 days (either continuous chart or two
readings per day, at least one per shift)
• Heat Treatment
- Analytical results for density of Salmonella sp.
bacteria or fecal coliform (most probable number)
- Logs documenting sludge heated to temperatures
greater than 180°C for 30 minutes (either
continuous chart or three readings at 15 minute
intervals)
• Pasteurization
- Analytical results for density of Salmonella sp.
bacteria or fecal coliform (most probable number)
- Temperature maintained at or above 70°C for at
least 30 minutes (either continuous chart or two
readings per day, at least one per shift)
• Composting
- Analytical results for density of Salmonella sp.
bacteria or fecal coliform (most probable number)
- Description of composting method
- Logs documenting temperature maintained at or
above 55°C for 3 days if within vessel or static
aerated pile composting method (either continuous
chart or two readings per day, at least one per
shift)
- Logs documenting temperature maintained at or
above 55°C for 15 days if windrow compost
method (minimum of two readings per day, at least
one per shift)
- Logs documenting compost pile turned at least five
times per day, if windrow compost method
• Gamma Ray Irradiation
- Analytical results for density of Salmonella sp.
bacteria or fecal coliform (most probable number)
- Gamma ray isotope used
- Gamma ray dosage at least 1.0 raegarad
- Ambient room temperature log (either continuous
chart or two readings per day, at least one per
shift)
• Beta Ray Irradiation
- Analytical results for density of Salmonella sp.
bacteria or fecal coliform (most probable number)
- Beta ray dosage at least 1.0 megarad
- Ambient room temperature log (either continuous
chart or two readings, at least one per shift)
Alternative A6— PFRP Equivalent
• Operating parameters or pathogen levels as necessary to demonstrate equivalency to the PFRP
• Analytical results for density of Salmonella sp. bacteria or fecal coliform (most probable number)
                                             19

-------
Recordkeeping	Section Three

                                                Table 7
                              Recordkeeping Requirements for Class B
                                   Pathogen Reduction Alternatives
     Atternatiw Bl-Fecal Cofiform Count
     •  Number of samples collected during each monitoring event

     *  Analytical results for density of fecal coliform for each sample collected
     Alternative B2—Processes to Sgnffiauitly Reduce Pathogens (PSRP)
        Aerobic Digestion
        -   Dissolved oxygen concentration
        -   Volatile solids content before and after digestion
        -   Mean residence time of sludge in digester
        -   Logs showing temperature was maintained for sufficient period of time (ranging from 60 days at 15°C to
           40 days at 20°C) (continuous charts or two readings per day, at least one per shift)

        Air Drying
        -   Description of drying bed design
        -   Depth of sludge on drying bed
        -   Drying time in days
        -   Daily average ambient temperature

        Anaerobic Digestion
        -   Volatile solids content before and after digestion
        -   Mean residence time of sludge in digester (between 15 days at 35°C to 55°C and 60 days at 20°C)
        -   Temperature logs of sludge in digester (continuous charts or two readings per day, at least one per shift)

        Composting
        -   Description of composting method
        -   Daily temperature logs documenting sludge maintained at 40°C  for 5 days (either continuous chart or two
           readings per day, at least one per shift)
        -   Hourly readings showing temperature exceeded 55 °C for 4 consecutive hours

        Lime Stabilization
        -   pH of sludge immediately and then 2 hours after addition of lime	
     Aftenmtive B3-PSRP Equivalent
        Operating parameters or pathogen levels as necessary to demonstrate equivalency to PSRP
The time and temperature requirement for sewage sludge with a solids content of 7 percent or higher is
determined using equation 1:

                                             _  131.700.000
                                                    jQ0.1400t

where:
D     =   Tune in days
t      =   Temperature in degrees Celsius.
                                                    20

-------
Section Three	Recordkeeping
This equation was developed for sewage sludges that are at least 7 percent total solid and are treated by
pasteurization or composting. To use this equation to determine pathogen reduction reliably, the sludge
temperature must be maintained at 50° C or higher and the detention time must be at least 20 minutes.

The minimum time endpoint is not appropriate for treatment processes that heat the small particles of
sewage sludge with warm gases or an immiscible liquid.  If sewage sludge particles are heated by either
warm  gases or  an immiscible liquid and the percent total  solids is 7  percent or higher, the specific
temperature and time relationship is still determined using equation (1).  However, the minimum value
for time that can be used in the equation is now 15 seconds. The shorter time is  allowed because heat
transfer is more efficient for such processes as rotary driers that use this technique for heating sludge
particles. The minimum value for the temperature variable is still 50° C.

When  the percent total solids is less than 7 percent and the detention time is greater than 15 seconds but
less than 30 minutes, then equation (1) is still used to determine the specific time and temperature values
that achieve compliance with the requirement.

When  the percent total solids is  less then  7  percent and the time is more than   30 minutes and the
temperature of the sewage sludge is 50° C or  higher, then a less stringent equation (eq. 2) may be used
to determine the specific time and temperature values.

                                      n      50,070,000                               ,    „,
                                      D  =         '                                   (eq- 2)
where:
D    =   Time in days
t     =   Temperature in degrees Celsius.

To demonstrate compliance with the operational parameters, the responsible individual should check the
temperature in the sludge treatment unit(s) and record it to demonstrate that die sludge was held at a
constant temperature for the required number of days. If the temperature is not recorded continuously,
it should be checked and recorded during each work shift or at least twice a day.

The  objective is to  obtain temperature readings that are representative of the temperature maintained
throughout the treatment process.  So, for example, if the treatment unit is operated 24 hours a day, each
                                              21

-------
Recordkeeping	Section Three
temperature reading should be evenly spaced,  if feasible.  Otherwise, temperature readings should be
taken at the beginning and end of the work day.  If the process is operated for 1 day or less, record the
sludge temperature at the beginning, middle, and end of treatment.

In addition, records must document the detention tune of the sludge in the treatment unit. Records should
also identify the daily input of sludge to the treatment unit(s) and the withdrawal of supernatant and
processed sludge. The size (gallons) of the treatment unit(s) should also be documented.

In  addition to  documenting  the treatment unit  operating   parameters, Alternative  Al  requires
documentation of monitoring for either Salmonella sp. bacteria or fecal coliform at the time of use or
disposal.  The preparer should keep the following records documenting sampling and analysis for either
Salmonella sp. bacteria or fecal coliform and percent solids:

      •    Date and time  of sample collection, sampling location, sample type, sample volume, name of
          sampler, type of sample container, and methods of preservation, including cooling
      •    Date and time  of sample analysis, name of analyst, and analytical methods used
      •    Laboratory bench sheets indicating all raw data used in the  analyses and the calculation of
          results (unless  a contract laboratory performed the analyses for the preparer)
      •    Name of contract laboratory, if applicable
      •    Sampling and analytical QA/QC procedures
      •    Analytical results expressed as dry weight.

Alternative A2—Alkaline Treatment
Alternative A2, like Alternative A1, requires the analysis of sludge quality and the evaluation of operating
parameters.  As with the time and temperature alternative, the sludge must be monitored for either
Salmonella sp. bacteria or fecal coliform. The sludge must be kept at a pH of 12 for 72 hours.  The
temperature must be greater than S2°C for at least 12 of these hours. At the end of the 72-hour period,
the sludge must be air-dried  until it is more man 50-percent solid.  When properly performed, this
pathogen reduction alternative also achieves vector attraction reduction (see Section 3.3).

Use of this alternative requires that operating logs be kept that document pH, temperature, residence time,
and percent total solids.  The temperature of the sewage sludge should be checked and recorded to
                                             22

-------
 Section Three
                                                                                 Recordkeeping
 document it is above 52°C for 12 continuous hours during the required 72-hour holding period.  If the
 temperature is not continuously monitored, it should be checked hourly when feasible.  At a minimum,
 it should be recorded at the beginning, middle, and end of treatment.  Similarly, the pH of the sewage
 sludge should be recorded at the beginning, middle, and end of the required 72-hour holding period.  The
 percent total solids also should be determined for each batch.  Analytical records (described under the
 time and temperature alternative) for pathogenic organisms must document that sludge was analyzed at
 the time of use or disposal for either Salmonella sp. bacteria or fecal coliform at the frequency specified
 in Table 4.

 Alternative A3—Analysis and Operation
 Alternative A3,  like the first two alternatives, utilizes  a combination of sludge quality analysis  and
 documentation of operating parameters. In addition to monitoring for either fecal coliform or Salmonella
 sp. bacteria, preparers must monitor for enteric viruses and viable helminth ova.  If the preparer follows
 the steps outlined hi Figure 3, he or she can substitute documentation of operating parameters for periodic
 analysis of enteric viruses and viable helminth ova. The preparer must sample sludge prior to pathogen
 reduction.  If the analytical results show that enteric viruses  and viable helminth ova are not detected,
 then  the sludge meets Class A.  Otherwise, the preparer must sample and analyze the sludge after
 pathogen reduction treatment. If this final sludge meets the  Class A requirements after treatment,  the
 preparer may document consistent maintenance of operating parameters shown to achieve appropriate
 pathogen reductions instead of analyzing samples of the sewage sludge for enteric viruses and/or viable
 helminth ova. Regardless of how the preparer demonstrates compliance with the enteric virus and viable
 helminth ova requirement, the final sludge must be sampled and analyzed at the time of use or disposal
 for either fecal coliform or Salmonella sp. bacteria according to the frequency specified in Table 4.

 Records must include documentation of sludge sampling and analysis before and after pathogen reduction
 treatment.  Refer  to the time and temperature alternative for a list of sampling and  analysis records. The
 records also must define the values used for operating parameters between the before- and after-treatment
 sludge analyses. If operating parameters are substituted for periodic sludge monitoring, records must also
 document that these values are maintained consistently.  The specific operating parameters that must be
recorded  to demonstrate compliance may  vary  depending on the particular pathogen reduction process
used (e.g., composting, pasteurization).
                                              23

-------
Recordkeeping
                                                               Section Three
                                                           a  il!
                                                           iifl1
                                                                .
           Figure 3: Pathogen Reduction Alternative A3—Analysis and Operation
                                                                      646-09
                                     24

-------
 Section Three
                                                                                  Recordkeeping
 Alternative A4—Analysis Only
 Alternative A4 relies solely on the analysis of sewage sludge for pathogens (i.e., Salmonella sp. bacteria,
 enteric viruses, and viable helminth ova) and indicator organisms (i.e., fecal  coliform) to demonstrate
 pathogen reduction.

 Records must document that these parameters were sampled and analyzed at least as often as specified
 in the Part 503 regulation (see Table 4).  The preparer should keep records documenting the following
 items for each sampling event:

      •   Date and time of sample collection, sampling location, sample type,  sample volume, name of
          sampler, type of sample container, and methods of preservation, including cooling
      •   Date and time of sample analysis, name of analyst, and analytical methods used
      •   Laboratory bench sheets indicating all raw data used in the analyses and the calculation of
          results (unless a contract laboratory performed the analysis for the preparer)
      •   Name of contract laboratory, if applicable
      •   Sampling and analytical QA/QC procedures
      •   Analytical results expressed as dry weight.

 Alternative AS—Processes to Further Reduce Pathogens
 Alternative A5 requires a combination of sludge analysis for either fecal coliform or Salmonella sp.
 bacteria and  documentation of operating parameters.  The specific operating parameters  that must be
 evaluated are defined by the Processes  to  Further Reduce Pathogens (PFRPs) that were originally
 established hi 40 CFR Part 257.  These have been modified slightly and are included in Appendix B of
 Part 503.  The seven different processes and the specific operating parameters  for each are included in
 Table 6.  Records should include a description of the pathogen reduction process, documentation of
 sampling and analysis  of the sludge for iecal  coliform or Salmonella sp. bacteria, and  log books
 documenting  proper operation of pathogen reduction processes.

 Alternative A6—PFRP Equivalent
 Alternative A6 requires a combination of sludge analysis and documentation of operating parameters.
As  with the  other Class A alternatives,  the sludge must be monitored for either fecal coliform or
Salmonella  sp. bacteria. Alternative A6 requires sewage sludge to be treated in a process equivalent to
                                              25

-------
Recordkeeping
                                                                                 Section Three
a PFRP, as determined by the permitting authority. The permitting authority should have specified the
appropriate records to  demonstrate  compliance with this  alternative.  The records could  include
temperature in sludge treatment units, retention time, pH,  solids  or moisture content, and dissolved
oxygen (DO)  concentration.

Alternative Bl—Fecal Coliform Count
Alternative Bl requires the analysis of the sewage sludge for fecal colifonn.  The responsible individual
should maintain the following records demonstrating compliance with the fecal colifonn level:

      •  Date and time of sample collection, sampling location,  sample type, sample volume, name of
         sampler, type of sample container, and methods of preservation, including cooling
      •  Date and time of sample analysis, name  of analyst, and analytical methods used
      •  Laboratory bench  sheets indicating all raw data used  in the analyses and the calculation of
         results (unless analysis was performed by a contract laboratory)
      •  Name of contract laboratory, if appropriate
      •  Sampling and analytical QA/QC procedures
      •  Analytical results expressed as dry weight
      •  Calculation of the geometric mean of the seven samples  analyzed to demonstrate compliance
         with the maximum allowable level (see Table 3).

In addition, the  use of this  alternative and any other Class B pathogen reduction alternative for bulk
sewage sludge that will be land applied requires that the land applier demonstrate compliance with specific
site restrictions.  The preparer is responsible for keeping records on the site restrictions only when he
or she is also performing the land application.

Alternative B2—Processes  to Significantly Reduce Pathogens
The Processes to Significantly Reduce Pathogens (PSRPs) were originally established hi 40 CFR Part 257.
These have been modified slightly and are included hi Appendix B of Part 503.  As with the PFRP
 alternative, the  specific operating parameters  that must be evaluated vary depending on the sludge
treatment process used, as  listed hi Table 7.  Records should include a  description of  the pathogen
 reduction  process  and log books documenting  regular and  frequent evaluations of the  operating
 parameters.
                                               26

-------
 Section Three                                                                    „    ,,
 	»	.	___	Recordkeepmg
 Alternative B3—PSRP Equivalent
 Alternative B3 requires sewage sludge to be treated in a process equivalent to a PSRP, as determined by
 the permitting authority.   The permitting authority should have specified the appropriate  records to
 demonstrate compliance with this alternative.  The records could include temperature in sludge treatment
 units, retention time, pH, solids or moisture content, and DO concentration.

 3.3  Records of Vector Attraction Reduction
 When sewage sludge is land applied or placed in an active surface disposal unit, the Part 503 regulation
 requires a certification that the vector attraction reduction requirements were met and a description of how
 these requirements were achieved.  The description should be supported  by documentation of process
 controls and management practices for treatment processes that achieve vector attraction reduction.  As
 with the pollutant and pathogen records, this documentation must  be kept for 5 years.

 There are a total of 11 options to comply  with the vector attraction reduction requirements.  The first
 eight options (see Table 8)  apply to both the land application  and surface disposal  sludge quality
 requirements. These eight options, referred to as the sludge processing options, involve sludge treatment
 to reduce vector  attraction characteristics.   They are performed primarily by  preparers during or
 immediately after pathogen reduction.   Options 9 through 11, referred to as the sludge management
 options,  are performed by land appliers  at the land application site or by owners/operators of surface
 disposal  sites after placement on the sewage sludge unit.  These sludge management options are not
 included in this guidance because they are not performed by the preparer, unless the preparer is also the
land applier or owner/operator of the surface disposal site.  However, they are discussed in the following
documents:

     •   Land Application of Sewage Sludge-A Guide for Land Appliers on the Recordkeeping and
         Reporting Requirements of the Federal Standards for the Use or Disposal of Sewage Sludge
         40 CFR Pan 503 (EPA, 1993)
     •   Surface Disposal of Sewage Sludge-A  Guide far  Owners/Operators of Surface  Disposal
         Facilities on the  Monitoring, Recordkeeping, and Reporting  Requirements of the Federal
         Standards for the  Use or Disposal of Sewage Sludge, 40 CFR Part 503 (EPA, 1993)
                                             27

-------
Recordkeeping
                                                                                       Section Three
                                               Table 8
     Recordkeeping Requirements for Vector Attraction Reduction Sludge Processing Options
    Option 1-VoIatite Solids (VS) Reduction
^JJTW1PI"H *^^* »«» »F»*^W — ** ^™-«™r-n—0* T-
Aerobk PigestJon/CaBpostiag)
       Volatile solids concentration of raw and final
       sludge streams (mg/kg)
       Calculations showing 38 percent reduction in
       volatile solids
   Sludge detention time in digester/composting
   Temperature logs (at least two readings per day)
   showing average temperature above 45 °C and
   piitiimiini temperature above 40°C for 14
   consecutive days 	                 	
     Options 2 aid 3—Bench-Scate VS Redactioa
Options 6—Alkaline Treatment
     •  One-time description of bench-scale digester
     •  Time (days) that sample was further digested in
        bench-scale digester (30 days for aerobically and
        40 days for anaerobically digested sludge)
     •  Temperature logs (at least two readings per day)
        showing temperature maintained at 20°C for
        aerobically or between 30°C and 37°C for
        anaerobically digested sludge
     •  Volatile solids concentration of sludge (mg/kg)
        before and after bench-scale digestion
   Logs demonstrating hours pH of sludge/alkaline
   mixture was maintained (12 for 2 hours and 11.5
   for an additional 22 hours)
   Amount of alkaline added to sludge (Ibs or gals)
   Amount of sludge treated
     Option 4—Specific Oxygen Update Rate
 Options 7 and ^-Drying
        Dissolved oxygen readings for sludge sample
        over 15-minute intervals (mg/L)
        Temperature logs at beginning and end of DO
        readings showing test was conducted at 20°C
        Total solids for sludge sample (g/L)
        SOUR calculations (mg/g)
    Results of percent solids (dry weight) test
    Presence of unstabilized solids generated during
    primary treatment
 Options 1 Through
                                  Solids Reduction
  Volatile solids are representative of the unstable, putrescable organic matter in the sludge. Reductions
  in organic matter reduce putrescibility and, thus, vector attraction.  Option 1 requires a demonstration
  that volatile solid concentrations are reduced by 38 percent between the raw sludge and the digested
  sludge.  Control of Pathogens and Vectors in Sewage Sludge (EPA,  1992) presents several methods of
  calculating volatile solids reduction.  The simplest equation is reproduced below:
                                                    28

-------
 Section Three
                                                                                   Recordkeeping
                 %VS
                                            %VS
                       Reduction
                            (raw)
                                    %vs(raw)  -  [%vs(raw) x %vs(sttbilized)]
 where:
 VS(raw)
 VS(stabilized)
= Percent reduction of volatile solids
= Volatile fraction in raw sewage sludge
= Volatile fraction in stabilized sewage sludge.
 The preparer needs to maintain records on the volatile solids content (mg/kg) of both of these streams
 and the calculation of volatile solids reduction.  While most preparers evaluate this parameter regularly
 to document constant process operation, records must show that volatile solids reduction was evaluated
 at least as frequently as specified in Table 4 in Section 2.

 Options 2 and 3 are methods to demonstrate that vector attraction reduction is achieved even though 38
 percent volatile solids reduction was not attained. Option 2 applies to anaerobically digested sludge, and
 Option 3  applies to aerobically digested sludge.  These  methods involve taking a sample  of the final
 digested sludge and digesting it further in a bench-scale apparatus for a specified period over a specific
 temperature range.  It is important to dilute the sample of aerobically digested sludge to 2 percent solids
 or less. Bench-scale tests run with a higher percent solids do not produce reliable results. Percent solids
 does not affect tests performed on anaerobicly digested sludge.  If the sludge sample is from an anaerobic
 digester, the bench-scale unit must be operated between 30°C and 37°C for 40 days.   Vector attraction
 reduction  is achieved if the volatile solids are reduced by less than 17 percent in the bench-scale digester.
 If the sample is taken from an aerobic digester, the bench-scale unit must be operated at a temperature
of 20°C for 30 days. Vector attraction reduction is achieved if the volatile solids are reduced by less than
 15 percent in the bench-scale digester. The following records demonstrate that these alternatives are met:

     •   A description of the bench-scale digester and its operation
     •   The  time (days) that the previously digested sludge sample was further digested in the bench-
         scale digester
     •  The  temperature (degrees Celsius) maintained in the  bench-scale digester for the time (days)
        the sample was being further digested; the temperature should either be recorded continuously
        or it  should be checked and recorded during each work shift or during at least two well-spaced
        intervals during each day.
                                              29

-------
      „   .                                              	Section Three

Option 4—Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate
The specific oxygen uptake rate (SOUR) is the rate by which oxygen is consumed by microorganisms in
the sludge. A reduction of this rate indicates a lack of organic matter to be further oxidized or broken
down and, therefore, reduced vector attractiveness. Vector attraction reduction is achieved if the SOUR
is equal to or less than 1.5 mg of oxygen per hour per gram of total solids at a temperature of 20°C.
The  preparer should perform the  SOUR  test  and  record  the following  information to  demonstrate
compliance:

      •    DO readings of the sludge taken at 1-minute intervals over a 15-minute period or until the DO
          is reduced to less than 1 mg/L and the average DO value used in the SOUR calculation
      •    Calibration records for the  DO meter
      •    Total solids determination for the sludge in g/L
      •    Temperature (degrees Celsius) taken at the beginning and end of the procedure
      •    Calculation of SOUR using the following equation:
                                                    .      (DO mg/L\
               oxygen consumption  rate per minute  	:	
   SOUR =  	    	i—5!?—L (60 minlhour)
                                  total solids (g/L).

 While most preparers evaluate this  parameter regularly to document constant process operation, the
 records must demonstrate that the SOUR was evaluated at least as frequently as specified in Table 4 in
 Section 2.

 Option 5— Aerobic Processing
 Aerobic processing, such as  thennophilic aerobic  digestion and composting, is effective for reducing
 vector attraction characteristics because the higher operating temperatures achieve higher rates of organic
 solids reduction. To achieve vector attraction reduction under Option 5, the aerobic process must be
 operated for 14 days with a minimum temperature greater than 40°C and an average temperature between
 45°C and 60°C.  The preparer should record the following information to demonstrate compliance:

      •   Sludge residence tune
       •   Temperature (degrees Celsius) of the sewage sludge; the temperature should either be recorded
           continuously or checked and  recorded at least once per work shift or at least twice a day.
                                              30

-------
Section Three                                                                   Recordkeeping
          residence tbm is determined by dividing the digester volume  (one-time measurement
   [gallons}) by &e volumetric Sow rate tojugh the digester (measured on a eontmqous basis {gpd]).
Option 6—Alkaline Treatment
The alkaline treatment process destroys or inhibits pathogens and the microorganisms that decompose
sludge. Therefore, odors and putrescibility are reduced, leading to reduced vector attraction. For Option
6, the pH of the sewage sludge must be raised to 12 and maintained there for 2 hours without adding
extra alkaline.  Then the pH must remain at or above 11.5 for  an additional 22 hours. The preparer
should maintain the following records to document alkaline treatment:

      •  pH (standard units) recorded at least at the (T, 2", and  24-hour intervals of treatment
      •  Duration of time (hours) that pH is maintained at or above specified minimum levels
      •  Amount (pounds or gallons) of alkaline material added
      •  Amount of sludge treated (e.g., gallons, kilograms).

Options 7 and 8—Prying
Heat and air drying remove moisture from the sludge, thereby reducing pathogenic organisms and odor.
Odor reduction leads to reduced vector  attractiveness.   Two vector  attraction reduction alternatives
involve drying. The primary distinction between the two is whether or not unstabilized solids generated
during primary wastewater treatment are a component of the sewage sludge.  If unstabilized primary
wastewater solids (i.e., raw sludge) are present, then the percent total solids of the final sewage sludge
must be at least 90 percent to meet the vector attraction reduction requirement.  If raw sludge  is not
present, then the percent total solids of the final sewage sludge must be 75 percent (or greater). The
preparer should determine percent total solids for each batch of sludge and keep the following records
to demonstrate compliance:
          Results of solids analysis of sewage sludge prior to mixing with other material(as dry weight)
          expressed as percent of final sludge
          Presence of unstabilized solids generated during primary treatment.
                                              31

-------
Recordkeeping
Section Three
Records must demonstrate that the analysis of percent total solids was performed at least as frequently
as specified in Table 4 in Section 2.
                     — Unstabiiized solids are organic materials in sewage s^^
                                               32

-------
Section Four                   	   	  Notification and Reporting
                       4.  NOTIFICATION AND REPORTING

Several notification and reporting requirements are directed at persons who prepare sewage sludge. These
include notice and necessary information, notice of interstate transport, and annual reports. The first two,
notice and necessary information and notice of interstate transport, are applicable when the sewage sludge
is going to be land applied.  However, if the sewage sludge that is prepared for land application meets
the exceptional  quality criteria, then the notification requirements do not apply. This section describes
all three notification and reporting requirements.

4.1  Notice and Necessary Information
When sewage sludge is prepared for land application in bulk form or for distribution in a bag or other
container, the preparer must inform the applier of the sludge quality. The notification requirements are
different if the sludge is sold or given away in a bag or other container rather than being land applied in
bulk.  The notice and necessary information requirement does not apply when the sewage sludge or the
material derived from sewage  sludge meets the  exceptional  quality criteria.   A  sample format for
providing notice and necessary information is in Appendix B.

Bulk Sewage Sludge
When bulk sewage sludge that is not exceptional quality is prepared for  land application, both the
preparer and the land applier have notification requirements.  The preparer must provide the following
sludge  quality information to the land applier:

      *   Pollutant concentrations
      •   Nitrogen concentration (TKN, ammonia, and nitrate nitrogen)
      •   Pathogen reduction level achieved  (Class A or Class B)
      •   Vector attraction reduction option used (Options 1-8).

The land applier must have this information to comply with the Part 503 regulation when land applying
the sewage sludge. If the pollutants do not meet the pollutant concentration limits hi  Table 3 of 40 Code
of Federal Regulation (CFR) 503.13, then the land applier must track the cumulative pollutant loading
rates.  If a Class B pathogen reduction alternative was used, then the land applier must ensure that the
site restrictions are met.  If the preparer did not perform one of the sludge processing vector attraction
reduction options (Options 1-8), then the land applier must perform one of the sludge management vector
                                               33

-------
 Notification and Reporting
Section Four
 attraction reduction options (Options 9-10).  For a more detailed description of the responsibilities of the
 land  applier, refer  to  Land  Application  of Sewage Sludge: A Guide for  Land  Appliers on the
 Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements of the Federal Standards for the Use or Disposal of Sewage
 Sludge (EPA, 1993).

 The land applier is also  responsible for providing the land owner or lease holder of the land notice and
 necessary information to comply with the Part 503 requirements.  For example, if the sludge only met
 Class B pathogen reduction, then the land owner or lease holder must be informed of the site use and
 access restrictions.  In addition, if the pollutant concentration limits in Table 3 of 40 CFR 503.13 are
 not met, the land applier must track the cumulative pollutant loading rates for each land application site.
 In this case, the  land applier  must document  and provide the land owner or lease holder with the
 following information:

      •    Location of land application site
      •    Date bulk sludge was applied
      •    Time bulk sludge was applied, if Vector Attraction Reduction Option 9 or 10 was used
      •    Number of hectares where the  sludge was applied
      •    Amount of bulk sludge applied
      •    Cumulative amount of each pollutant (i.e., kilograms) applied.

The land owner or tenant may  request specific information, such as analytical results on sludge quality
or documentation on how the management practices are met.  In general, the example form in Appendix
B may be used to satisfy the notice and necessary information requirements of both the preparer and the
land applier.

Sewage Sludge Sold or  Given  Awav in a Bag or Other  Container
When sludge that does not meet the pollutant concentration limits in Table 3 of 40 CFR 503.13 is  sold
or given away hi a bag or other container, it must be accompanied by a label or instruction sheet.  The
label or instruction sheet must contain the following information:

     *   Name and address of the person who prepared the sewage sludge for distribution
     *   Statement that  land application is prohibited except in accordance with the instructions
                                             34

-------
Section Four	Notification and Reporting
     •    Instructions on the annual whole sludge application rate that will comply  with the annual
          pollutant loading rates in Table 4 of 40 CFR 503.13.
4.2 Notice of Interstate Transport
When bulk sewage sludge that does not meet the exceptional quality criteria is going to be applied to land
outside the State in which the sludge was prepared, the preparer is required to provide written notice
prior to the initial application of the sewage sludge.  The written notice must include the following
information:

     •   Location, by either street address or latitude and longitude, of each land application site
     •   Approximate time when bulk sewage sludge will be applied to the site
     •   Name, address, telephone number, and National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit
          number for the person who prepares the bulk sewage sludge.

This notice must be submitted to the permitting authority for the State in which the bulk sewage sludge
is proposed to be applied. Contact the appropriate EPA Regional office for specific information on where
to send this notification.
Most preparers are required to report annually to the permitting authority under 40 CFR Part 503.
Annual reports cover information and data collected during the calendar year (January 1 to December
31).1  Reports on sludge quality must include the results from monitoring pollutant concentrations and
pathogen levels, a description of operating parameters for pathogen reduction and vector attraction
reduction, and certifications that pathogen and vector attraction reductions were achieved. Permits issued
by EPA or the State may contain additional reporting requirements.

Who Is Responsible For Submitting Reports Under 40 CFR Part 503?
Facilities responsible for reporting annually are described hi the regulation as:
    1 The first annual report required under the regulation is due February 19,  1994.  It must contain
information generated after the July 20, 1993, compliance deadline through December 31, 1993.
                                              35

-------
Notification and Reporting	Section Four
     •   Publicly owned treatment works (POTW) with an average design influent flow rate equal to
         or greater than 1 million gallons per day
     •   POTWs serving a population of 10,000 or more
     •   Class I  sludge management facilities.

Class I facilities are defined as POTWs identified under 40 CFR 403.8(a) as being required to have
approved pretreatment programs (even if they are in a State that has elected to assume local pretreatment
program responsibility). In addition, the EPA Regional Administrator and State Director may designate
any other treatment works as a Class I facility,  including sludge generators, processors, land appliers,
and owners/operators of surface  disposal sites and incinerators. All facilities defined or designated as
Class I facilities are subject to the reporting requirements described in this section.

What Information is Required
The Part 503 regulation specifies that reports cover the information that preparers are required to keep
in their records.  This includes background information on the generation, use, and disposal of sludge;
the results of sludge quality analysis; and a description and certification for pathogen and vector attraction
reduction requirements.  This section describes  the  specific data and documentation that must be
submitted.

Preparers are asked to report basic information about the sludge amount and its use or disposal.  Specific
facts needed by EPA and the State include the following:

 ,    • '  Amount of sludge generated, in metric tons expressed as a dry weight (see Appendix C for
         equations to convert sludge volume to metric tons)
                                                             .••*-,     .,,-.'            •     . "• "•'
     •   Use or  disposal practices
     •   Amount of sludge  that goes to each use or disposal practice
     •   Name and address of the preparer who will receive the sludge next, if applicable
     •   Name and address of the land applier and  owner/operator  of the surface disposal site  ,  if
         different from the generator.

The  reporting requirements  for  pollutant limits include submission of  the analytical results from
monitoring pollutant concentrations hi the sewage sludge.   Reports should include the results of all
                                              36

-------
Section Four
analyses performed during the reporting period using the prescribed analytical methods).  Analytical
results must be reported as milligrams per kilogram dry weight.  Reports should also indicate which
analytical methods were used, how frequently sludge was monitored, and the types of samples collected.
Preparers may have to report additional information regarding pollutants if they beneficially use or
dispose of the sludge themselves.

Preparers also are required to submit  a certification and description of how the pathogen reduction
requirements were met. A detailed description of the pathogen reduction treatment process should include
the type of process used and standard operating  procedures.  It should identify specific values for all
 operating parameters.  The description should also include a  schematic diagram.   The certification
 statements  required by the 503 Rule  are  listed in Section 503.17, Recordkeeping, and  have been
 reproduced in Appendix D of this document. It should be noted that the preparer of sludge meeting only
 Class B pathogen reduction requirements does not have to report records kept by the land applier, land
 owner, or  lease holder on the site restrictions used to limit public contact with the sludge once it is
 applied. In addition, if sludge is placed on an active surface disposal unit and covered daily, the preparer
 does not have to perform or report on pathogen reduction.

 Finally, preparers are required to report information regarding vector attraction reduction when one of
 the sludge processing options  is  used  (Options 1-8).  The report must contain a description and
  certification that the vector attraction reduction requirements were met.
  When and Where Are
                                 Submitted?
  Annual reports required under Part 503 are due February 19 every year beginning in 1994.  Annual
  reports must be submitted to the Permitting Authority, which is the EPA Regional Water Compliance
  Branch Chief until State sludge management programs are delegated the responsibilities of the Federal
  program. The address for each Branch Chief is provided on the inside back cover of this booklet. The
  map on the front cover shows the EPA Region in which each State is located.
                                                  37

-------
  U.S  Environmental Protection Agency.  1993.  A Guide to the Federal EPA Rule for Land Application
     of Domestic Septage to Non-Public Contact Sites. EPA/832-B-92-005.               Application

  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.  1993. Land Application of 'Sewage Sludge - A Guide
     W«rsonthe Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements of the Federal Standards f
     Disposal of Sewage Sludge, 40 CFR Part 503. Washington, DC:  Office of Wate7

  ^Environmental Protection Agency.  1993.  Sewage Sludge Sampling Techniques.  Demonstration


  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.  1993. Summary of 40 CFR Part 503.
 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.  1992. Environmental Regulations and
    of Pathogens and Vectors in Sewage Sludge.  Cincinnati, OH.
                                                                  protocoisfor

u A
                                                                    S°M

                        ADDITIONAL REFERENCES FROM EPA
                                          38

-------
                          APPENDIX A

WORKSHEET FOR CALCULATING THE ANNUAL WHOLE SLUDGE APPLICATION RATE
            TO MEET THE ANNUAL POLLUTANT LOADING RATE

-------

-------
 Applicability:
 For sewage sludge sold or given away in a bag or other container where the pollutant concentrations exceed those in Table 3 of
 §503.13 but do not exceed those in Table 1 of §503.13.
 Procedure:
 Step 1: Measure the concentration of the pollutants listed in column 1 for the sewage sludge.  Record the concentration in
       column 3 according to milligrams of pollutant per kilogram of solids in the sludge.
 Step 2; Perform the calculation as shown for each pollutant and record the annual whole sludge application rate in column 4.
   COLUMN 1
  POLLUTANT
      COLUMN 2
ANNUAL POLLUTANT
   LOADING RATE,
    kg/ha/365 days
    COLUMN 3
   POLLUTANT
CONCENTRATION,
      mg/kg
      COLUMN 4
   ANNUAL WHOLE
SLUDGE APPLICATION
RATE, tonnes/ha/365 days
 ARSENIC
 CADMIUM
 CHROMIUM
 COPPER
 LEAD
 MERCURY
 MOLYBDENUM
 NICKEL
 SELENIUM
 ZINC
          2.0
          1,9
          150
          75
          15
         0.85
         0.90
          21
          5.0
          140
                    X1000
                    X1000
                    X1000
                    X1000
                    X1000
                    X1000
                    X1000
                    X1000
                    X1000
                    X1000
Step 3: Compare each of the annual whole sludge application rates in column 4 and choose the lowest recorded rate. Record
       the number in the space provided below.
THE ALLOWABLE AWSAR* IS:
                                metric tons per hectare per 365 days.
*   Please note that any time the sludge quality changes, the annual whole sludge application rate must be reevaluated. To
    reduce the frequency that the label must be changed, the preparer may opt to base the AWSAR on the highest
    concentration recorded for each pollutant from historical data.  However, the preparer must continue to compare sludge
    concentrations data to the pollutant concentrations used to develop the AWSAR.
                                                 A-l

-------

-------
                      APPENDIX B
SAMPLE FORMAT PROVIDING NOTICE AND NECESSARY INFORMATION

-------

-------
                                 NOTICE AND NECESSARY INFORMATION

This form is to assist compliance with the bulk sewage sludge notification requirements [503.120].  Please note, however,
that if the sewage sludge meets the exceptional quality criteria, then the notification requirements do not apply. This form
can be used by preparers of sewage sludge to transmit information to land appliers and also by land apphers to transmit
information to land owners or lease holders.

Name
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Mercury 	 __J
Molybdenum
Nickel
Selenium


Concentration (mg/kg)
Dry Weight











Pollutant Concentrations
(Table 3, 40 CFR 503. 13)
(monthly average)
41 mg/kg
39tng/kg
1200 mg/kg
1500 mg/kg
300 mg/kg
17 mg/kg
18 mg/kg
420 mg/kg
36 mg/kg
2800 mg/kg
N/A
Ceiling Concentrations*
Table 1,40 CFR 503. 13)
(daily maximum)
75 mg/kg
85mg/kg
3000 mg/kg
4300 mg/kg
840 mg/kg
57 mg/kg
75 mg/kg
420 mg/kg
100 mg/kg
7500 mgteg
N/A
 *Sludge may not be land applied if any pollutant exceeds these values.

 B.   Pathogen Reduction (40 CFR 503.32) — Please indicate the level achieved

                                    LJ   Class B
J
Class A
 C.   Vector Attraction Reduction (40 CFR 503.33) — Please indicate the option performed

                                    LI  Option 2               LJ   Option 3

                                    1	]  Option 6               I—I   Option?
     Option 1

     Option 5
                                                                               1	!   Option 4


                                                                               LJ   Option 8
             No vector attraction reduction options were performed
 D.   CERTIFICATION

      I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision
      in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information
      submitted  Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system or those persons directly responsible
      for gathering die information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledp and belief, true, accurate, and
      complete. I am aware that there are  significant penalties for submitting false information, including fce possibility of
      fine and imprisonment for knowing violations.
A. Name and Official Title (type or print)
C. Signature
B. Area Code and Telephone Number
D. Date Signed
                                                       B-l

-------
A.    If the pollutant levels in the sewage sludge do not meet the pollutant concentration limits in Table 3, then the land applier must
      provide the land owner with the following information:
      1.    Location of land application site
     2.    Number of hectares where die sludge was applied,

     3.    Date and time bulk sewage sludge was applied	

     4.    Amount of bulk sludge applied	
     5.    Record the amount of each metal and nitrogen applied in pounds per acre or kilogram per hectare.
tate

AtMrfc

Ctdttfe*

CBHtttumft

. *>M*ii

tttd.

MaKtay .

MoJyMenum

Nfckrf



Sac



     1.
     2.

     3.

     4.
 B.   If a Class B pamogen reduction alternative was used (see Part I), then the following site restrictions must be met.  Please check the
      boxes if any of the site restrictions apply.

             Food crops that may touch the sewage sludge/soil mixture cannot be harvested before the end of the following waiting
             period:

             LJ a.  If harvested parts are totally absye the land, wait to harvest for 14 months after the application of nhidgft

             D b.  If harvested parts are bejow the land surface and the sludge sat on top of the soil  for 4 months before me field
                    was plowed, wait to harvest for 20 months after the initial application of sludge.

             U c.  If harvested parts are feejowthe land surface and the sludge was mcoiporated into me soU wimin 4 months of
                    being applied, wait to harvest for 38 months after the initial application.

             LJ Feed crops cannot be harvested for 30 days after application of the sludge.

             LJ Animals cannot graze on the land for 30 days after application of the sludge.

             LJ ff harvested turf is used for a lawn or other purpose where mere is a high potential for public exposure, then the turf
                 cannot be harvested for 1 year after the application of the sludge to the land.

      5.     U Public access to land with a h,jgh p"ftntiflj (parks, playgrounds, golf courses) for public exposure will be restricted
                 for 1 year after the application of the sludge.

      6.     LJ  Public access to land with a low potential (private property, remote or  restricted public lands) for public exposure
                 will be restricted for 30 days after the application of the sludge.


C.    If the preparer did not perform vector attraction reduction options (see Part I), then either option 9 or 10 must be performed by the
      land applier. Please indicate if option 9 or 10 was performed. Check appropriate box.

      LJ    Option 9—Subsurface Injection     LJ   Option 10—Incorporated (plowed) into the  Soil    CH   N/A

D.    CERTIFICATION

       I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachmeaU were prepan^ uoler my dilution or supervi^n in accordaiKe with a system
       designed to assure thai qualified personnel properly gather and evahiale the information submitted-  Btuedonmy  ioquiiy of the person or persons who
       manage the system or tfaoae penona directly rapoanble for gathering the mfomsitkia, the informatkm submhtcd is, to ^ best of my kowledge ^
       belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine
       and imprisonment for knowing violations.
A. Name and Official Title (type or print)
C. Signature
B. Area Code and Telephone Number
D. Date Signed
                                                           3-2

-------
                    APPENDIX C





EQUATIONS FOR CONVERTING SLUDGE VOLUME TO METRIC TONS

-------

-------
                          -if- *. f fl't \  ^  *•  ^*\+?.^ -% '^   '  3* %  -L** '^'rf" rt ' .  Q*f*+ v%  * , F"&  ^.S. ^b >  * ,' *" ^H'%  ^*  *- O,  *i.*^   -. "-y^v.,
                          ", **  iv  ° N  ** •#• '   ^   -y VA* i^%'-^ >\^ -1   "*1'Ai   j **^  v * s   ' n      o      /• -^ ^  "*   / '      ^ ^



                         9 ^!{
 ApDlicahilitv;


 The amount of sewage sludge used or disposed must be reported as metric tons, dry weight.

 Procedure:


 Step  1:  Convert the common measure (e.g., cubic yards or gallons) to the English System or short tons, dry
         weight.                                                                                        J
Dry short tons = gallons of sewage sludge x *
                                                                           ton
                                                               gallon    2000 Ib
                                                                                 x Percent SoUds
           8.34 Ib/gal is the density of water.  This equation is therefore applicable to liquid sludges (less
           than 5 percent solids).  Site-specific densities may be determined and substituted in this equation
           for a more accurate result.
           Dry short tons = cubic yards (wet) of sewage sludge x
                                                                ton
                                                                  cubic yard   2000 Ib
                                                                       x Percent Solids
          Y Ib/cubic yard is the site-specific bulk density of the sewage sludge.  It must be determined for
          each type of sludge prepared and substituted in the equation for accurate results.
Step 2: If you are starting with the English System or short tons, convert them to dry weight.


                                    Dry tons  = Wet tons x Percent Solids




Step 3: Convert the English System or short tons to metric tons.


                                  Dry metric tons - Dry short tons x .907
                                                    C-I

-------

-------
      APPENDIX D





CERTIFICATION STATEMENT

-------

-------
         EXAMPLE CERTIFICATION STATEMENT FOR
                PATHOGEN REDUCTION AND
             VECTOR ATTRACTION REDUCTION

   "I certify, under penalty of law, that the [insert either Class A pathogen
requirements in §503.32(a) or Class B pathogen requirements in §503.32(b)]
and the vector attraction reduction  requirement in {insert one of the vector
attraction reduction requirements in §503.33(b)(l) through §503.33(b)(8)J
[insert  either have or have not] been met. This determination has been
made under my direction and supervision in accordance with the system
designed to ensure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate
the information used to determine that the pathogen and vector attraction
reduction requirements have been met. I am aware that there are significant
penalties for false certification including fine  and imprisonment."

Note:    The exact language of the certification should be tailored to
accurately describe which requirements  have been met and which have
not been  met,  when applicable.
                             D-l

-------

-------
 Addresses
 ^^__v^_^__



 Mail compliance reports required under the Standards for the Use or Disposal of Sewage Sludge to the

 Water Compliance Branch Chief in your EPA Region at the following address:
  REGION 1
  Water Compliance Branch Chief (WCC)
  Water Management Division
  U.S. EPA Region 1
  JFK Federal Building
  Boston,  MA 02203-2211

  REGION 2
  Water Compliance Branch Chief
  Water Management Division
  Room 845
  U.S. EPA Region 2
 26 Federal Plaza
 New York, NY  10278

 REGION 3
 Water Compliance Branch Chief (3-WM50)
 Water Management Division
 U.S. EPA Region 3
 841 Chestnut Street
 Philadelphia, PA  19107

 REGION 4
 Water Compliance Branch Chief (WPEB-1)
 Water Management Division
 U.S. EPA Region 4
 345 Courtiand Street, NE
 Atlanta, GA  30365
 REGION 6
 Water Compliance Branch Chief (6W-EA)
 Water Management Division
 U.S. EPA Region 6
 1445 Ross Avenue
 Dallas, TX 75202-2733

 REGION 7
 Water  Compliance Branch Chief (WACM)
 Water  Management Division
 U.S. EPA Region 7
 726 Minnesota Avenue
 Kansas City, KS  66101
 REGION 8
 Water Compliance Branch Chief (8WM-C)
 Water Management Division
 U.S. EPA Region 8
 999 18th Street, Suite 500
 Denver, CO  80202-2466


 REGION 9
 NPDES Compliance Section (W-5-3)
Water Management Division
U.S. EPA Region 9
75 Hawthorne Street
San Francisco, CA 94105-3901
REGION 5                              1^^ 10
Water Compliance Branch Chief (WCC-15J)   Water Compliance Branch Chief (WD-135)
Water Management Division                Water Management Division
U.S. EPA Region 5                        U>S, EPA Rg^ 10
77 West Jackson Boulevard                 1200 6th Avenue
Chicago, IL 60604-3590                   Seattle, WA 98101-3188

-------

-------