— i £
CO I o
•o o °
111
Z5 LU D-
•o
0
CD
8-0
CO
3
"co
O> C £
egg
Jog
^ CO LU
N CD
ell
"^ i
Co Q) 4-i
CO CD J5
^ Q ^
United States
Environmental Protection Agency
(4204)
Washington, DC 20460
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use
$300
. Bulk Rate
Postage and Fees Paid
EPA
G-35
2
506
CO iu
1
TO
O>
U
i
.0
u.
"TO
"ro
O
1
j>>
1
.a
"e
.2
i>
•s
^
CSI
g"
^
S
M
O
S
^f
§
vo
X
O
CQ
C)
(^
1624-8301
0
o
oo
Web Sites
-------
To address these barriers, EPA is working wi
partners to implement an initiative to promo
m ^g benefits of onsite/decentralized wastei
""""" systems.
!|*
sr £&•
OJ *v
, liability concerns and engineering fees
, financial constraints
CjJ tO h— i
, lack of knowledge and public mispercepti<
. legislative and regulatory constraints
, lack of management programs
B
OT
IN \ 996 CONGRESS requested EPA to exa
the benefits of onsite/decentralized wastewa
system alternatives versus centralized wastev
collection and treatment. In its response to
Congress in April 1997, EPA concluded that
"adequately managed decentralized wastewa
systems are a cost-effective and long-term opi
for meeting public health and water quality g
Five barriers to the successful implementatic
onsite/decentralized wastewater systems we:
identified:
s g g |- g 3 S g.
° F B fi 8
Report to Congress
promote proper management of such system:
.
swimmable" waters for all Americans. Inch
the CWAP are several initiatives to address tl
of onsite/decentralized wastewater systems <
as &
sS?
EPA work with other federal agencies and th
public to develop a Clean Water Action Plan
(CWAP) to fulfill the act's goal of "fishable a
g. "
ON THE 25TH anniversary of the 1972 Cle
Water Act, Vice President Al Gore requestec
p^^ tj
P
«-f
Clean Water Action Plan
\
I
\
\
\
1
How is EPA involved?
3 ff tf
II
------- |