FINAL REPORT
   NEARFIELD MONITORING OF SLUDGE
   PLUMES AT THE 106-MILE DEEPWATER
        MUNICIPAL SLUDGE SITE:
    RESULTS OF A SURVEY CONDUCTED
  AUGUST 31 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 5, 1987
               June 17, 1988
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    Office of Marine and Estuarine Protection
              Washington, DC
    Prepared Under Contract No. 68-03-3319

-------

-------
                               EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

     The U.S.  Environmental  Protection Agency  (EPA)   under the Marlw
Protection,  Research,  and Sanctuaries Act of 1972  (MPRSA .PL 92-53^  ,  s
monitoring the 106-Mile Oeepwater Municipal  Sludge Site J^-Mile Site).   ne
objective of the 106-Mile Site monitoring program  is  to ensure that  P™^'ons









Effects.

     This report presents the results from nearfield fate studies  conducted  at

                                                arsa
 to guide monitoring activities to assess  short-term biological effects of
 sludge disposal .

      The 106-Mile Site monitoring plan presents  several  M>Jthe«s related to
 nearfield fate of sludge plumes,  and these hypotheses were  tested during the
 survey.  Results from the survey indicated the following.


 Permit Compliance

      Ho3: Concentrations of sludge and sludge constituents  are below the
           permitted LPC and WQC outside the site at all  times.

           Results  from the survey indicated that sludge plumes can  be
           transported outside the site before all constituents are  diluted to
           levels below WQC.

       H«4- Concentrations of sludge  and sludge constituents are bellow the
        °  pitted LPC  and WQC  values within the site 4 h after disposal.

           Although the  conditions at  the  site during the survey jere
           dispersive,  measured  concentrations of two sludge co nstitu ejts
           copper and lead,  exceeded water quality criteria 4  h after disposal

-------
      H05: Pathogen  levels  do  not  exceed ambient levels 4 h after disposal.

           Concentrations of Clostridium perfrinqens. a microbial tracer,
           exceeded  ambient levels after 4 h in all sludge plumes monitored
           during the survey.

 Impact Assessment
      H06: Sludge particles do not settle in significant quantities beneath the
           seasonal pycnocline or to the 50-m depth at any time, within the site
           boundaries or in an area adjacent to the site.

           Sludge penetration below 20 m was not observed at any time during
           the survey.  Because a strong current "jet" occurred within the
           pycnocline throughout the survey, sludge may have been transported
           quickly from the survey area, precluding observations of settling.

           Throughout the region,  vertical  profiles of natural  turbidity
           exhibited a subsurface maximum situated  within the seasonal
           pycnocline.  This suggests  that  surface-dumped particulate matter may
           accumulate within the seasonal  pycnocline during  summer'and  coexist
           with  natural  planktonic species.

      H07:  The concentration of sludge constituents is not detectable in the
           site  one day  after disposal.

           Although  sludge  plumes  were not tracked  for longer than  9  h  after
           disposal,  calculations  of dispersion  indicated  that  all  measured
           sludge  constituents  would reach ambient  levels  within  1  day.

      Ho8:  The concentration of sludge constituents at the site boundary or  in
           the area  adjacent to the site is  not detectable one day  after
           disposal.

           Calculations  indicated that concentrations of sludge constituents
           would be  diluted  to  ambient levels within 1 day for all plumes
           monitored.

      H09:  The disposal  of sludge does not cause a significant depletion in the
           dissolved oxygen  content of the water nor a significant change in the
           pH  of the seawater in the area.

           Any depression of oxygen levels in sludge plumes was minor.  pH was
           not monitored during the survey.

     Results of the survey  have provided the first  complete  assessment of
sludge plume behavior and transport under summer conditions.   Many of the
measurements will be repeated during the winter,  when  vertical  dispersion is
expected to be much greater than in the summer.   The measurements will  also be
repeated in the summer,  so that we can develop  an understanding of variability
of measurements  of plume behavior.  These results will also  be  used to plan
acoropnate measurements of short-term effects  of sludge dumping and  will  ouide
5 ans for assessing fe -field fate of sludge  constituents.

                                      i i

-------
                               TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0  INTRODUCTION	 •  •  •  •	'	1"1

2.0  SURVEY OBJECTIVES AND STRATEGY	.2-1

3.0  SAMPLE COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS METHODS.  .	  .  .  . ,.3-1

     3.1   PHYSICAL OCEANOGRAPHIC  MEASUREMENTS	.3-1

           3.1.1   Water Column  Profiling	•  •  •  «3-l
           3.1.2   Current Measurements	3-4
           3.1.3   Aerial Photography	«3-6

     3 2   WATER QUALITY SAMPLE  COLLECTION	  .  .  .	.3-7
     33   ENDANGERED SPECIES OBSERVATIONS .  .	.3-8
     3*.4   ANALYTICAL METHODS	-3-8

           3.4.1    Trace Metals	•	•  •  -3-8

                    3.4.1.1    Cadmium, Copper,  Iron,  Lead,  Nickel, and
                              Zinc	3-10
                    3.4.1.2    Silver.  . .  •	3-10
                    3.4.1.3    Chromium	3-10
                    3,4.1.4    Mercury 	3-10
                    3.4.1.5    Selenium and Arsenic	  ..3-11

            3.4.2   Organic  Compounds	?~H
            3.4.3   Total  Suspended Solids (TSS).  .	3-11
            3.4.4   Clostridium perfrinqens.	3-11

 4.0  RESULTS AND DISCUSSION	4~1

      4.1   OCEANOGRAPHIC  CONDITIONS	.  . .	.4-1

            4.1.1   Water  Mass Characteristics	.4-1

                    4.1.1.1    CTD Transect to the 106-Mile Site	.4-2
                    4/1.1.2    Satellite Thermal Imagery	4-5
                    4.1.1.3    Hydrographic Conditions at the Site	.4-5

             4.1.2   near-Surface Currents	-4-7

                    4.1.2.1    XCP Current Profile Results 	  .4-8
                    4.1.2.2    Near-Surface Drifter Results	4-11

       4  2   BACKGROUHD WATER QUALITY	  4-13
       4*.3   BARGE RECORDS	•  -	J-J°
       4.4   SLUDGE PU1ME BEHAVIOR	• *-20

-------
                         TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
                                                                           Page
           4.4.1   Lateral and Vertical Spreading 	  4-20

                   4.4.1.1   Lateral Spreading. ...-..'	4-20
                   4.4.1.2   Vertical Spreading 	  4-25

           4.4.2   Sludge Dilution and Transport	4-28

                   4.4.2.1   Dilution Based on Plume Volume 	  4-28
                   4.4.2.2   Dilution Based on Transmissometry Data . . .  4-29
                   4.4.2.3   Dilution Based on TSS Data	„ . 4-33
                   4.4.2.4   Dilution Based on Chemical Tracer Data . . .  4-35
                   4.4.2.5   Plume Transport	4-41

     4.5   HATER QUALITY MEASUREMENTS	  4-45

           4.5.1   Comparison to Water Quality Criteria 	  4-46
           4.5.2   Dissolved Oxygen 	  4-48
           4.5.3   Clostridium perfrinqens	•	4-50

     4.6   OBSERVATIONS OF CETACEANS AND MARINE TURTLES	  4-53

5.0  CONCLUSIONS	 . .	5-1

     5.1   DISCUSSION OF NULL HYPOTHESES	5-1
     5.2   EVALUATION OF MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES. . :.	5-3

6.0  REFERENCES	6-1

-------
                              TflRI F OF CONTENTS
                                 (Continued)
                                 TST  OF TABLES
                                                                          Page
Table 2-1. Elements and Compounds for Which There Are Marine Water          _
           Quality Criteria ........ • ............... *
                                                                            2-4
Table 2-2. Monitoring Activities ........... ..........

Table 2-3  Barges That Dumped Municipal Sewage Sludge at the 106-Mile
Table i 6. t*arg ^.^ the Survey Operations From August 31 Through
           September 4, 1987  ................. ...... I**1"0

Table 3-1. Measurement Specifications for CTD Sensors. . .........  -3-3

Table 3-2. Objectives for Analytical Measurements of Water Samples  ....  .3-9

Table 4-1. Background Water Quality Measurements in Seawater at the         _
           106-Mile Site, September 1-4, 1987 ............ ...  .4 is
           106

      4-2  Summary of Dumping Information for  Barges  Dumping
      42.  Sunmry          y            Site  From
           August 31 Through September 4,  1987
 Table 4-3
 Table 4 .i.
                 Suspended Solids in Sludge Plumes and Estimates of
                            at the 106-Mile Site . .
Table 4-4  Total Suspended Solids in Sludge Plumes at the 106-Mile
           Site Monitored After Dumping. ...
Table 4-5. Estimates of Dilution at T=0 h and T=4.3 h Based on Metal
           Tracer Concentrations 	
4-18


,4-34


4-37


4-39
 Table 4-6. Comparison of Metal Measurements in Sludge Plumes DB-2 and

            SS WSSii ^&Z&£^ ™^*	4-47

 Table 4.7. J^4*j^                                            !
            Non-Compliance  Based  on  Mean  Contaminant Concentrations
             in Sludges  From 19  Sewaae Treatment  Plants  in  the New
             York Metropolitan Area (Santoro and  Fikslin, 1987),  and
             Mean Dispersion Rates (From Metal  Tracer Data,  Sludge
             Plume 'OB-3)	

  Table 4-8. Concentrations  of C.  perfrinqens in  the Sludge Plumes
             at T=0 and Between  4 and 7 h  After Disposal.   (Results
             are Based on the Maximum Observed in the Set ot
             Replicate Samples for the Sample Period).	
                                                                            4-49

-------
                               LIST OF APPENDICES

Appendix A.  Data Quality Assessments for Analytical Measurements ...... A-l

Appendix B.  CTD Transect to the 106-Mile Site and
             Water Masses During Plume-Tracking Surveys ........... B-l
Appendix C.  Background Data ........................ c_j

Appendix D.  Summary of Laboratory Analyses For Dumping Events DB-1
             DB-2, and DB-3, 106-Mile Site, September 1987 ....!...  .D-l

-------
                               TABLE OF CONTENTS
                               "(Continued)
                                                                         Paqe
                                LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1-1.  Location of the 106-Mile Deepwater  Sewage  Sludge  Site  ....  .1-2

Figure 3-1.  Schematic Diagram of Shipboard Data Acquisition System	3-2

Figure 4-1.  Vertical Transect of Hydrographic Properties  Along  Eastbound^  ^
             CTD Transect	

Figure 4-2.  Composite of Hydrographic Profile Results  from Stations     ^  ^
             1, 4, and 5	• • •	
                               ^_._ ~* u,+^ M«C Boundaries   onq ^ ^ ^ ^g


                                            ,_J, Current Direction,
                                            No.  6 on September 4, 1987 . .  .4-9


                                                                      .  . .4-10

 Figure 4-6.   Composite of  Current and  Water Temperature Profiles Obtained
 ngure •* u   ^< ^^ Launched  During the  Four  Plume  Surveys	 . i ;i«

 Figure 4-7.   Summary of Near-Surface Drifter  Trajectories  from  Plume        ^
              Surveys DB-1, DB-2. and DB-3	

 ngur.,4-8.   Barge Dumping ^^gc,^  tjj  Four Princi^

              (DZ^l) thafoumped on the Day Prior to Survey DB-1.  ..... 4-19

 Figure 4-9.  Results from Analyses of Aerial  Photography  for                j
   9          Plume Surveys DB-1 through DB-3  	

 Figure 4-10. Analysis of  Plume Width for Plumes DB-2 and  DB-4.  .  	 4-23

 Figure 4-11. Composite of Vertical Turbidity (Beam Attenuation) Profiles
              made Within  Plume  DB-3	'



               Events DB-1  and DB-4	

  Figure 4-13, TSS Concentration^and^TSS^oad^Ca  cuj^e^ ^ ^ ?^^ ^  ^ ^ 4_32

-------
                               TABLE OF CONTENTS
                                  (Continued)
                                LIST OF FIGURES
                                  (Continued)


Fiaure 4-14A. Total Suspended Solids Concentrations Monitored During
              Dumping Event DB-1 (Sludge From Wards Island Sewage
              Treatment Plan, New York, NY)	 4-36

Fiaure 4-14B. Total Suspended Solids Concentrations Monitored During
              Dumping Event DB-3 (Sludge From Port Richmond Sewage
              Treatment Plant, New York, NY) 	 4-36

Fiaure 4-15.  Copper,- Lead, and Zinc Concentrations Monitored During
              Dumping Event DB-3 (September 3, 1987) 	 4-40

Figure 4-16.  Diagnostic Tracer Ratios for Sludge Plumes DB-2 (Sludge
              From Wards Island Sewage Treatment Plant, New York City,
              NY) and DB-3  (Sludge From Port Richmond Sewage Treatment
              Plant, New York City, NY)	•	4-42

Figure 4-17.  Summary of Plume Advection for Plumes DB-1 and DB-2	4-43

Figure 4-18.  Summary of Plume Advection for Plumes DB-3 and DB-4	4-44

Fiaure 4-19.  Variations in Water Properties Along a Transect of Plume
              DB-4 that Was made 55 Minutes After Discharge from the
              Barge.  Reductions in Salinity, Sigma-t,  and Oxygen
              Correspond With High Turbidity and  (Beam  Attenuation)
              Within the Plume	4"51

-------
                               1.0  INTRODUCTION

     Under the Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act of 1972 (MPRSA,
PL 92-532), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is responsible for
regulating disposal of wastes, including sewage sludges, in ocean waters.
Under this authority, EPA has published ocean dumping regulations (40 CFR Parts
220-229) that specify procedures for monitoring ocean dumpsites.  EPA's
responsibility for developing and maintaining monitoring programs for
designated ocean disposal sites is described in these regulations.
     In carrying out the responsibility for developing monitoring programs,
EPA has prepared a monitoring plan for the 106-Mile Deepwater Municipal Sludge
Site (106-Mile Site) (   EPA   , 1992a).  The site is located off the coast from
New York and New Jersey  (Figure 1-1) (   EPA  , 1987a).  Data generated by the
program will be used by site managers to make decisions about site
redesignation or dedesignation; continuation, termination, or modification of
permits; and continuation, termination, or modification of the monitoring
program itself.
     The objective of the 106-Mile Site monitoring program is to ensure that
the regulations are met through assessment of compliance with permit
conditions and assessment of potential impacts on the marine environment.  The
program is being implemented according to a tiered approach, whereby data
collected  in each tier are not only used in making site management decisions
but are also required as the foundation for the design and extent of
monitoring activities in the next (lower) tier.  Four tiers are included in
the monitoring program:  (1) Sludge Characteristics and Disposal Operations;
(2) Nearfield Fate  and Short-Term Effects; (3) Farfield Fate; and (4) Long-
Term Effects.                                                            ;
     Nearfield fate  studies being conducted under Tier 2 of the monitoring
program address both the permit compliance and the impact assessment     '
components of monitoring at the site.  Currently, dumping at the site is
conducted  under court order.  When permits for di.sposal of sludges are  issued,
they will  stipulate that water quality criteria  (WQC), where they exist, may
not  be  exceeded within the site  4 h after  dumping or  outside the site at any
time.   When  WQC do  not exist,  the permits  will require  that the concentration

                                       1-1

-------
                                                    106—Mil* D««pwattr
                                                    Municipal SJudg*  Sit*
T5URE 1-1.    LOCATION OF THE  106-MILE DEEPWATER MUNICIPAL SLUDGE SITE.
                                       1-2

-------
of the sludge not exceed a factor of 0.01  tlme^.Ct^Cente^^b"ne°Wn *" "' :
                                                  potent,,  for impacts .thin
 the site.   Monitoring  behavior  and movement of sludge ,-ediately after
    posa!  is necessary  to eonflr. assumptions regarding di.persion and  , u  on
 that will  be used in issuing permits.   This information will also be used to
 gufde litoring activities to  assess  short-term biological effects of sludge
               ile Site monitoring plan presents  the  following hypotheses
 related to neat-field. fate of. sludge plumes:
      it  Compliance
:  --rations
                                        ^e.nstitue.s^ide the
       H05: Pathogen leve!s do not exceed ambient  levels 4 h after disposal
         Assessment

             the site one day after  disposal
                                         1-3

-------
     H09: The disposal of sludge does not cause a significant depletion
          in the dissolved oxygen content of the water nor a significant
          change in the pH of the seawater in the area.
     The activities being conducted under Tier 2 have been selected to test

these hypotheses.  These activities include direct studies of sludge plumes

under varied oceanographic and meteorological  conditions.   Specifically,  Tier 2

includes the following activities designed to  assess nearfield fate, as

described in an implementation plan that supplements the monitoring plan  for

the site (   EPA   , 19925):


Permit Compliance
     Measure sludge constituents in the water column to determine
     fate of sludge constituents, with respect to permit conditions
     and ambient conditions.  Measurements of water quality, chemical
     and microbiological parameters are being made to determine
     whether concentrations of sludge constituents meet permit
     conditions and are at background levels within one day after
     disposal.  These measurements address null hypotheses 3 through
     5 and 7 through 9.
Impact Assessment
     Conduct sludge plume observations to define the seasonal
     patterns of sludge dispersion at the 106-Mile Site.  Nearfield
     fate studies include use of a variety of methods to track sludge
     plumes under summer and winter conditions.  These studies are
     being used to determine when and where samples should be taken,
     when and where the sludge plume crosses the site boundary, and
     where to sample to determine whether sludge constituents are
     detectable one day after disposal.  They also provide
     information on whether sludge particles settle beneath the
     pycnocline.  The studies provide information to guide sampling
     for sludge constituents in the water column and also address
     H06.
     Preliminary observations of plume transport at the site were made during

an EPA survey of the site  in September 1986  (   EPA  , 1988 ).  Visual

observations and measurements of sludge tracers  (total suspended solids and

                                      1-4

-------
spores of the microbe Clostridium perfrinqens)  indicated  that  sludge  pTu.es
could be tracked to the boundaries of the 106-Mile Site.   These preliminary
observations indicated that there is a potential  for violating permit
conditions and for adverse short-tern impacts from disposing sludge at the
         then developed a strategy for comprehensive assessment of nearfield,
short-term fate of sludge constituents (   EPA '. 1987.) .  This strategy
outlined a plan for assessing various methods of tracking sludge plumes and
for measuring compliance with expected permit conditions.  It presented the
following  specific  information  to  be obtained during a plume-tracking exercise
at the site:
 Permit Compliance
within 4 h after doping and outside the site boundaries
times.
                                                                    all
  Impact Assessment
       • Determination of the dilution of sludge  in  seawater  immediately
         upoHumping and during the first hour after  dumping.
       • Determination of the short-term effects  of  sludge on the dissolved
         oxygen levels at the site.
                                                                    surface
        •  Determination  of  the  extent of horizontal dispersion of the plume.
        •  Determination  of  the  extent of vertical dispersion of the dissolved
          and parti cul ate components of the plume.
        .  Determination  of  whether sludge  constituents settle below the summer
          pycnocline.
                                         1-5

-------
     This information was obtained through repeated sampling of sludge plumes
during a survey at the 106-Mile Site in September 1987.  Results of that survey
are presented in this report.  Chapter 2 presents the strategy for making
measurements of sludge constituents and tracers of the plume.  Chapter 3
describes the sample collection and analysis methods.  Chapter 4 describes the
oceanographic conditions in the region of the site at the time of the survey
and presents the results of the analyses.  The conclusions of the study,
including an assessment of methods used to track sludge plumes and an
assessment of behavior and transport of plumes in terms of the null hypotheses
are presented in Chapter 5.
     Results of the survey have provided the first complete assessment of
sludge plume behavior and transport under summer conditions.  Many of the
measurements will be repeated during the winter, when vertical dispersion is
expected to be much greater than  in the summer.  The measurements will also be
repeated in the summer, so that we can develop an understanding of the
variability of measurements of plume behavior.  These results will also be used
to plan  appropriate measurements  of short-term effects of sludge dumping and
will guide plans for assessing farfield fate of sludge constituents.
                                       1-6

-------
                      2.0  SURVEY  OBJECTIVES AND STRATEGY

     The objectives of the survey  of the 106-Mile  Site were to employ  a
variety of methods to (1) assess the movement,  dilution, and  setting  of sewage
sludge as sludge plumes are transported towards and beyond the sue boundary,
and (Z) determine whether water quality requirements that will be included  ,n
permits for dumping at the site are being met  during ongoing  disposal
operations.  Because this survey was the first field appHca^on of P™^
technical guidance for plume-tracking activities to be conducted as part  of the
106-Mile  Site monitoring  program, an additional objective was to test equipment
and protocols for future  plume-tracking activities that may be conducted  by EPA
or by  permittees.                                                 .
      EPA  strategy to  accomplish these objectives  involved conducting the
following methods in  the survey:                                            •
     '• identification and tracking  of  a sludge plume with dye and           \
        surface  and subsurface drogues.
        and a contracted aircraft.
      • Acauisition of in situ transmissometry and acoustics  data  and
        shipboard Sv/fluSrescence data to monitor the movement and
        dispersion of the plume.
                  p                       «
         sludge  components  and dilution of these components.
       • Collection  of samples for  analysis °^h
         have marine water  quality  criteria (WQC,
       • Acquisition of satellite-derived  ocean  frontal analyses,

         the survey.
        • Acquisition  of real-time navigation  data to support plume-
         tracking activities.
                                       2-1

-------
     TABLE 2-1.  ELEMENTS AND COMPOUNDS FOR WHICH THERE ARE MARINE
                WATER QUALITY CRITERIA&
Inorganic Elements
Organic Compounds
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium (hexavalent)
Copper
Cyanide
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Zinc

Aldrin/Dieldrin
Chlordane
DDT and Metabolites
Endosulfan
Endrin
Heptachlor
PCBs
Toxaphene
     samples on  this work  assignment were  analyzed for total chromium  instead
 of hexavalent chromium.   Cyanide'was  not  analyzed.
                                           2-2

-------
      Observations  of endangered  species  of ce taceans  ™|Hne
       Site.
       The primary method for tracking sludge plumes was use of
transmissometry, which measured turbidity resulting from high levels of total
suspended solids in sludge.  Both horizontal and vertical transmissometry
profiles were used to monitor nearfield fate of disposed sludge in a marked
volume  (by surface drifters and Rhodamine dye) of sludge plume.  Horizontal
profiling techniques provided data on the horizontal and vertical dispersion of
sludge,  and  resulted in  relatively more data on lateral  spreading.  Vertical
profiling  resulted  in  data on vertical dispersion.   Both profiling  techniques
were supported  with  the  collection of samples  for  chemical  and microbiological
tracers.  However,  relatively more samples  were collected  during  vertical
profiling.   Surveying  operations were also  supported with  aerial    .
photoreconnaissance provided by Aero-Marine Surveys, Inc.   The aerial
 photoreconnaissance provided information on lateral plume  spreading and plume
 orientation.  A summary of horizontal and vertical profiling activities is
 presented in Table 2-2.                              '
      The survey was extremely successful in achieving objectives and
 performing  all survey activities.  Several CTD profiles were made during^the
 transit to  the site to  characterize  the water masses  at the site and vicinity.
 At  the  site before  surveying operations began, all  equipment  and procedures
 were tested and  samples were collected for background water quality.   The
  survey monitored four sludge plumes,  identified as DB-1 through  08-4,  on
  September 1 through 4,  1987 (Table  2-3).   The sludge  plumes were monitored from
  3 5 to 9 3  h each,  allowing EPA to  gather  information on  short-term  and
  nearfield physical, chemical,  and microbiological  characteristics  of sludge
  dumped at the site.  A fifth sludge plume  (DZ-1)  was monitored  for a short
  period of time on August 31,  1987.   Data from DZ-1 are incomplete and do not
  contribute  significantly to this report.
        A complete description of the  survey is presented in the initial survey
   report and in the  site condition report for the survey (   EPA   , 1987d and
     EPA   ,  1987e).
                                        2-3

-------
    Activity
                       TABLE 2-2.  MONITORING ACTIVITIES
                 Subactivity
Transect CTD Profiles

Shakedown Exercises
Vertical Profiling
Horizontal Profiling
None

Use of all oceanographic gear to track dye.
Activities include horizontal and vertical
profiling with in situ and pumping equipment
and collection of water samples for WQC contam-
inants.

CTD/transmissometer and acoustic vertical pro-
filing; pumping water from surface to 50 m,
collection of pumped samples for tracers, WQC
contaminants, TSS, and C. perfringens; XCP
profiling.

Towed  fish with CTD/transmissometer, transmis-
someter;  pumping water from  surface to 50 m
(fluorometry measurements),  collection of
pumped samples for tracers,  WQC contaminants,
TSS, and  C. perfrinqens; XCP profiling.
                                          2-4

-------
Buster
Bouchard
Sea
Trader II

Spring
Creek
1340  9/1 to
0335  9/2

1642  9/2 to
1950  9/1

1010  9/2 to
1400  9/2
                            1055  9/3  to
                            1535  9/3
                                           26th Ward,  New York City
Graves End Bay, Brooklyn


Ward's Island, New York City


Wards Island, New York City.


Port  Richmond,  New  York  City
                              2-5

-------

-------
                 3.0  SAMPLE COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS METHODS

                   3.1 ' PHYSICAL OCEANOGRAPHY MEASUREMENTS

     Physical  oceanographic data were acquired during the survey by vertical
and horizontal profiling of the water column,  vertical profiling of surface
currents, and dep' Dying near-surface drifters.  Aerial reconnaissance and
photography were also employed to document the behavior of the plume.

                         3.1.1  Water Column Profiling

    Vertical  and horizontal water column profiling was performed with a Sea-
Bird Electronics conductivity-temperature-depth  (CTD) system  interfaced to an
IBM-compatible  personal computer.   A Sea-Bird Electronics dissolved  oxygen
sensor  and  a  Sea Tech  25-cm pathlength  transmissometer were also  interfaced to
the  CTD underwater  unit for concurrent,  in  situ  measurements  of oxygen  and
turbidity (derived  from percent light  transmission).
      The CTD underwater unit  transmits digital  information  to a deck control
 unit via a Kevlar electromechanical (E/M)  profiling cable.   The CTD deck
 control unit passes the raw CTD data to the computer of the shipboard data
 acquisition  system for real-time display and data storage.   A Northstar Model
 7000 Loran-C receiver was  also interfaced to the computer system to obtain and
 record  vessel  position information  (Loran-C time delays, latitude,  and
 longitude) at  6-second intervals during surveying operations.  Figure 3-1
 illustrates  the hardware  configuration  of  the hydrographic data  system
 developed  by Battelle for the operations.  Measurement  specifications  for each
 of  the sensors are presented  in  Table 3-1.
       For all profiling operations, the stainless  steel  support frame of  the
  CTD underwater unit was  attached to the lower side of  a 3-foot (wingspan)
  Endeco V-Fin towed depressor.  For horizontal  profiling (towing) the E/M cable
  was attached-to the top of the V-Fin such that the CTD was towed horizontally
  with sensors pointing forward to ensure undisturbed flow past the sensors.   Fo
  v-tlcal  profiling the mechanical  termination of the E/M cable was attached  to
 V-e -op end of the CTD support frame, with the V-Fin still attached to the CTD
                                       3-1

-------
   Loran-C
  Navigation
Computer
                              CTD
                           Deck Unit
                                   E/M
                                  Cable
                              V-Fin
                               CTD
                             Profiler
                             Depth
                                                    «  Plotter
                                                      Printer
                         Disk Storage
                                                      Monitor
               Underwater
                  Unit
                             Temperature
                             Salinity
                             Dissolved Oxygen
                             Turbidity	
FIGURE 3-1.  SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM OF SHIPBOARD DATA ACQUISITION  SYSTEM
                                  3-2

-------
      TABLE 3-1.  MEASUREMENT SPECIFICATIONS FOR CTD SENSORS
Parameter
Depth
Temperature
Salinity
Oxygen
Light Transmission
   Range
 0 to 3000
-5 to 35°C
 0 to 40 ppt
 0 to 15 mL/L
 0 to 100 %
                                        Accuracy
+60 cm
+0.004°C
±0.005 ppt
+0.1 mL/L
+0.5 %
                                                        Resolution
12 cm
 0.0003°C
 0.0005 ppt
 0.01 mL/L
 0.01 %
Sampling rate:   24 samples per second (averaged to 4 samples per
Vertical resolution during profiling: ~40 cm
Horizontal  resolution during towing: -40 cm at 3-knot ship speed
                                  3-3

-------
frame.  Leaving the V-Fin attached to the CTD allowed faster CTD lowering rates
due to the added mass of the V-Fin.
     Following the survey, binary data files of the digital CTD data were
returned to the laboratory for processing and review.  The binary files of raw
data are stored on the hard disk of Battelle's IBM-compatible physical
oceanographic data processing computer system.  Backup copies of the raw CTD
data are also stored on 5-1/4 inch floppy disks and archived.  Hard copies of
printouts and graphic plots of CTD data that were generated in real time during
the cruise are also archived with the backup disks of raw data.
     The package for processing CTD data from vertical profiles and horizontal
tows was used to perform  the following functions:

      •  Conversion  of raw  (binary) CTD data  into engineering units:
        depth  (m),  temperature  (*C), salinity  (ppt), oxygen  (mL/L), and
        light  transmission (%  light extinction).
      •  Removal of  data  points  that  lie outside reasonable,  site-
        specific  ranges  for each measurement parameter.
      •  Retention of data  points only when  the depth  series  is
        monotonically  increasing  (because  good quality CTD  data  can only
        be  obtained when the sensors  are  descending through  the  water
        column and  passing through  undisturbed water).

 For CTD data  files acquired during  horizontal profiling  operations, the
 processing procedures  were identical  to  those described  above,  except that data
 were not excluded  on the basis of depth  changes  because  the sensors are
 continually towed  through undisturbed  water.

                           3.1.2  Current Measurements

      Vertical profiles of horizontal  currents in the upper 1500 m of  the water
 column were acquired using an expendable current profiling (XCP)  data
 acquisition system and XCP probes manufactured by Sippican Ocean Systems.  The
 XCP data acquisition system consisted of a Hewlett-Packard Model  9816
 sr'croromputer, an XCP controller unit containing a radio receiver,  and a radio
 antenna mounted on the upper deck of the survey vessel.  For profiling
 operations,  an XCP probe  was launched behind the vessel and data were

                                 .  •   3-4

-------
transmuted via the radio link to the on-board XCP data acquisition system.
During each profile, which lasted roughly 6 minutes,  engineering information
was stored in computer memory for near real-time analysis.  After the profile
cycle was complete, a processing program was used to convert the raw data into
engineering units of current speed, current direction, and water temperature
versus depth.  These results were plotted within one-half hour after the launch
to provide information on current shear in the upper water column which would
affect plume advection and tracking operations.  XCP data are stored on floppy
disks for easy access from analysis programs.
      A comparison  of current  vectors  obtained  from an  XCP and a 2-h trajectory
of  a  drogue  situated at  30 m  (plume  survey  DB-2)  indicated that current speeds
agreed to within a few centimeters per second and current directions agreed to
+5  degrees.   This  comparison  suggested that both current  measurement techniques
worked  remarkably well,  and  that the XCP was a good  indicator of  absolute
 currents in the upper  water  column.                                         ;
      Near-surface drifters,  designed to maximize the cross-sectional  area  of
 the drogue while minimizing  the surface area and windage of the surface
 markers, were fabricated specifically to track sludge plumes.  For each plume
 tracking operation/one "shallow'' drifter was deployed with a drogue tethered 5
 m below  the surface.  These drifters  remained with both the surface expression
 of the sludge plumes and the dye released within the  plumes for periods of
 several  hours.  A  "deep" drifter, having a  drogue tethered at a depth of 30 m,
 was  deployed  alongside  a shallow drifter for  one of the plume operations to
 observe  the currents beneath the seasonal  pycnocline.  Because the sludge
 plumes  were  apparently  confined to  the upper 20 m of  the water column, there  -
 was  no  operational need for  tracking water beneath  the pycnocline, and the use
  of "deep" drifters was  terminated.
       Drifters were tracked  visually from the survey vessel.   During vertical
  profiling operations,  the vessel  would periodically stop alongside the drifter
  to obtain a Loran-C position.   During horizontal  profiling,  drifter positions
  were obtained when the vessel  passed the drifter during  repeated transects of
  the plume.  All Loran-C drifter positions and times were recorded by  the
  computer system used to acquire the  hydrographic data.  For each drifter,  *
  file of positions and  times has been  archived  to facilitate analyses  of
  trajectories and  current vectors.
                                        3-5         .             '•'•''•

-------
                           3.1.3  Aerial Photography

     Reconnaissance by aerial photography was provided for three of the four
plume tracking events.  Using twin Hasselblad cameras mounted in the base of a
twin-engine survey plane, a total of 169 photographic images were acquired
during 9 h of photoreconnaissance at the 106-Mile Site.  The majority of these
images were taken directly over the survey vessel and dye patch in order that
the images could be used to determine the rate of spreading of the sludge
plume.  To facilitate quantitative analyses, a computerized data file was
established for management of the following information for each photograph:
time, date, aircraft  Loran-C position,  aircraft elevation, and aircraft
heading.
     Of the 169 photographic images obtained, a subset of 55  images were
selected  for  detailed analysis,  and a~10 x  10-1n color print  was made  of each
image.  The selection of images  was based upon (1)  the requirement that the  dye
patch and/or  survey vessel be within the field of view;  (2) the need for
distinct  surface  boundaries  of  the  sludge plume; and  (3)  the  need  for  a
reasonable time  series  of images throughout the  reconnaissance  survey.
      Quantitative analyses of the photographic prints consisted  primarily  of
measurements  of  plume width  and plume  heading.   Accurate measurements  of  plume
width were obtained  because  the elevation of the aircraft was recorded with
 each image and,  therefore,  a distance  scale could  easily be made to  convert
 from millimeters on  the photographic  print  to meters across the plume  in  full
 scale.   Having the OSV  Anderson in the field of  view for most of the images
 provided a useful calibration check on the  measurements  of plume width because
 the vessel's length could be measured on the photograph  and compared with the
 vessel's actual  length.  We estimate that the error in distance measurements
 from the aerial  photographs is on the order of ±5  m.  This error is
 significantly less than the actual small-scale variability in plume width that
 is observed  as the plumes spread behind the barges.
      Thirty  minutes  after discharge,  most of the plumes  exhibited a noticeable
 sinuous  behaviour with  surface  filaments extending downwind, which made it
 difficult to.accurately determine the  true width of the plume.  Care was taken
 to measure plume width  at the  same position  (in the vicinity of the dye patch)
                                      3-6

-------
in order to minimize interpretation errors,  but  after  about  one  hour
uncertainties in plume width were on the order ±25 m and  useful,  quant,tat,ve
results could no longer be obtained.
     Analyses of plume heading were performed using  the aircraft heading  the
geographic orientation of the photographic image)  and  the or1ent.t,on of the
pluL as measured on the photographic image.  The combined error in the
determination of plume heading is estimated to be ±5 degrees.

                      3.2

      Seawater sables  for  analysis  of trace metals, organics. total suspended.
 solids  (TSS), and  C.  oerfrinoens were collected from  several depths «th two
     ing sysL.   One system,  designed  for  Election of  surface -te-amples,
 consisted of a  10- Teflon tube connected to either a polypropylene  bellows
 metering pump or a stainless steel pump. Samples for metals, TSS, and
 C. serfrinaens  analysis were obtained from  the  polypropylene pump; the      _
                 pump was used to collect water  samples for analysis  of      -
 tase  pump w
chemicals.  A second system for collecting subsurface water  samp     m   oy  ^77
. of Teflon tubing housed on a stainless steel  hose w,nch.   The inlet for the.
tube was connected to the CTD system to deploy  it to  the desired  depth.
Subsurface water was pumped through either the  bellows  pump  or, when samples
for organics were collected, to a stainless steel centrifugal pump.
     unfiltered samples collected for trace metals analysis  were preserved
with high  purity  nitric acid  (1 mL/L or 5 mL/L for mercury samples).  Samples
  or TSS were  processed on  board the survey vessel by filtering seawater samp es
 through 0.4-^, Nuclepore  filters.  The  filters were precleaned and Prewe,9hed
 to within 1 «.   The particulate  sample was  rinsed three times with 30 m   of
 deionized water adjusted to pH 8.0 with NH4OH  to remove res,dual sea salts.
 Filters were labeled and stored for  shipment to  the  laboratory.
      Samples for organic contaminant analysis  were collected in  150-1 sta,n  ess
 steel  tanks and extracted with dichloromethane,  The dichloromethane extracts
 were stored for shipment to the laboratory.
                                       3-7

-------
                      3.3   ENDANGERED SPECIES OBSERVATIONS    .

     Because of concern for the possible impact of ocean dumping activities on
endangered or threatened species of marine mammals and turtles, the presence of
these species in the area was recorded.  Observations were made by a qualified
observer on the OSV Anderson.  These observations were recorded along
predetermined survey paths in 15-min periods,  where each period represented a
transect.
     The data were recorded into two major categories—location/environmental
and species/behavior.  Information in each category was recorded for each 15-
min observation period and both categories were identified by a unique survey
and observation number.  Location/environmental data included latitude-
longitude, start time, elapsed time, vessel speed and course, water depth and
temperature, barometric pressure trend, visibility, and wind direction and
speed.  Species/behavior data included species group (mammal, turtle), species
identification, number of  animals observed, age, distance and angle to
sightings, heading, animal association, debris association, and behavior.

                            3.4  ANALYTICAL METHODS

     Summaries  of  the  data requirements for shipboard and laboratory analytical
methods  are  presented  in Table 3-2.  Quality control methods used to verify  the
accuracy  and precision  of  these methods are presented in the Work/Quality
Assurance project  plan  for this work assignment.   Results of the  laboratory
analytical  quality control program  are  discussed  in  Appendix A  and  presented in
Tables  A-l through A-8 in  Appendix  A.   Analytical  methods are  presented  below.

                               3.4.1 Trace Metals

      Methods for the extraction and analysis  of trace metals varied for  some
 elements and are summarized  below.
                                      3-8

-------
  TABLE 3-2. OBJECTIVES FOR ANALYTICAL MEASUREMENTS OF WATER SAMPLES
   parameters
      ^=I^^raffim^=^=j=«-»—
       Detection   Percent   Percent
Units    Liarits    Accuracy  Precision
                                                                   Method
Seawater Oroanics

  PCB congeners,
   pesticides

SeawaterMetals
          .001
50
                               100
Ag, Cd, Zn
Cr, Pb, Cu
Fe
Hg
As
Se
Seawater TSS
^g 1 L .015
pg/L .030
ng/l -050
(ig/L .0005
pg/L -02
pg/LL .7
mg/L .01
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
Solvent extraction,
 GC-ECDa
                                                          Chelation extraction,
                                                           GFAAa
                                                          Chelation-extraction,
                                                           GFAAa
                                                          Chelation-extraction,
                                                           GFAAa
                                                          Gold  trap.  Hg
                                                           analyzer^
                                                          Hydride,  CVAAS
                                                          Hydride,  CVAAS

                                                           Filtration, gravime-
                                                            tric determination0
 a  EPA   ,  1987b.
 b  EPA   ,  1987f.
                                       3-9

-------
3.4.1,1  Cadmium. Copper. Iron. Lead. Nickel, and Zinc

     Unfiltered seawater samples were extracted at pH 5 with a 1 percent
solution of purified ammoniurn-1-pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate diethyl ammonium
diethyldithiocarbamate  (APDC-DDDC) and Freon (Danielsson et al., 1982).  Each
sample was extracted three times with 5-mL aliquots of Freon; all Freon
extracts were combined.  The metals were back-extracted into 2 ml of 10
percent nitric acid.  The nitric acid solutions were analyzed for cadmium,
copper, iron, lead, nickel, and zinc by graphite furnace atomic absorption
spectrometry (GFAAS) with Zeeman background correction.

3.4.1.2  Silver

     Unfiltered seawater samples were extracted at pH 1.8 using the APDC-DDDC
procedure outlined above.  Silver was analyzed using GFAAS.

3.4.1.3  Chromium

     Total chromium was determined using a modification of the methods
described by Cranston and Murray  (1977).  Chromium was coprecipitated with
0.01 N Fe(OH)2 after an aliquot of seawater was adjusted to pH 8 with NH40H.
The resulting precipitate was filtered and digested with 6 N nitric acid.
After dilution with deionized water to a known volume, the acid digests were
analyzed for total chromium by GFAAS.

3.4.1.4  Mercury

     Mercury in  seawater was  determined according to the method of Gill and
Fitzgerald  (1987).  Mercury  in a  known volume of seawater was reduced with
stannous chloride  in a  closed vessel.  The sample was purged with nitrogen and
the  resulting  elemental  mercury was  concentrated on gold-coated quartz  sand.
Using  heat,  the  amalgamated  mercury  was quantitatively desorbed from the gold
trap  into  a  stream of  helium and  analyzed with  a Laboratory  Data Control UV
mercury monitor.
                                     3-10

-------
3.4.1.5  Selenium and Arsenic

     Selenium and arsenic were determined by hydride generation of aliquots of
unfiltered seawater.  Selenium and arsenic were reduced with a 3 percent
solution of sodium-borohydride.  The elements were subsequently purged from
the sample into a heated quartz cell and quantified by AAS.

                            3.4.2  Organic Compounds

     High-volume  seawater  samples  (100  L) were extracted with 4 L
dichloromethane  (DCM)  in  150-L  stainless  steel extraction  vessels  on  board
ship.   The solvent  layer  was  removed and  the  aqueous  sample was reextracted
twice  with 2-L  aliquots of DCM.   Extracts were shipped  to  the  laboratory for
analysis.   In the laboratory, the extracts  from  each  sample were  combined and
reduced in volume.   Concentrated extracts were fractionated on  silica-alumina
columns to  remove matrix  interferences.
      Pesticides and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)  were  analyzed by electron
 capture detection capillary column gas chromatography (GC-ECD)  (   EPA   ,
 1987b).  Response factors for each compound were determined relative to the
 internal standard dibromooctafluorobiphenyl.   Field and laboratory recoveries
 were determined through the use of surrogate materials.

                       3.4.3  Total  Suspended  Solids  (TSS)

       In the  laboratory, samples were air dried in a Class-100 clean  room and
 the mass of  the  loaded filter determined.  The concentration of TSS  was
 calculated based on the weight of solids collected on the  filter  divided by
 the volume of  seawater filtered  (   EPA  , 1987c).

                          3.4.4  Clostridium perfrinoens

       Enumeration of C. perfrlnqens  in  seawater was performed according  to the
  methods of  Bisson  and.Cabelli  (1979).   C.  oerfrinqens-spores were collected  by
  filtering  0.1-,  0.5-,  and 1-L  aliquots of  seawater through 0.4-Atm polycar-
                                      3-11                                 :

-------
bonate filters immediately after collection.  The filters were cultured
anaerobically on modified C. perfrinoens (m-CP) medium.  Confirmation was
obtained by exposing the incubated plates to ammonium hydroxide vapors which
turn C. oerfrinaens colonies a magenta color.  The bacteria were quantified as
number of colonies per 100 ml of filtered seawater.
                                      3-12

-------
                          4.0  RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

          Results of the September 1987 survey are presented and discussed in
this section.  The results are discussed in terms of the background physical
oceanographic characteristics of the site at the time of the survey (Sections
4 1 and 4.2).  Sludge spreading and mixing are then discussed (Sections 4.3
and 4 4).  Impacts of sludge dumping on water quality are presented in Section
4.5.  Finally, results of the cetacean and marine turtle survey are presented
in Section 4.6.

                         4.1  OCEANOGRAPHIC CONDITIONS.

                        4.1.1  Water Mass  Characteristics

      The hydrographic  data  acquired during the  survey  represent a  high-
 resolution  data  set that is ideal  for analyses  of water mass characteristics
 and mixing.    These data, which include water temperature,  salinity,  density,
 dissolved oxygen,  and  turbidity,  were acquired with the high-resolution
 conductivity/temperature depth (CTD)  profiling system described in Section 3.
 This type of data set  can be utilized and presented in a variety of ways to
 provide information relevant to the objectives of the survey.  Examples  of such
 hydrographic analyses are listed below:

      •  Analyses of the vertical density  structure as  it relates
         to  mixing  of sludge plumes discharged at the 106-Mile
         Site.
      •   Analyses of temperature/salinity  data  for  identification
          of  shelf water,  slope  water,  and  Gulf  Stream warm-core
          eddies  in  the  vicinity of  the site.
       •   Comparisons between  shipboard observations of  water mass
          boundaries and those derived from satellite thermal
          imagery.
               *
       •  Analyses of background oxygen and turbidity
          characteristics at the site for comparison with water
          properties within  sludge plumes.

                                        4-1

-------
        Oceanographic characterization  of  the  site  to  allow
        comparisons  with past and future surveys, and  which  can
        ultimately lead to seasonal  descriptions  of the  106-Mile
        Site for use in establishing appropriate  rates for
        dumping of sewage sludge.
4.1.1.1  CTD Transect to the 106-Mile Site

     During the eastbound transit to the 106-Mile Site on August 31,  1987,  a
series of seven CTD profiles were made along a line extending from the edge
of the continental shelf, through the northern end of the 106-Mile Site, to a
position roughly 8 miles northeast of the site (see station positions in
Appendix B).  The primary objectives of this CTD transect were to locate the
position of the shelf water/slope water front (west of the 106-Mile Site),
and determine whether a warm-core Gulf Stream eddy was situated near the
eastern boundary of the site, as suspected from interpretations of satellite
thermal imagery.  A detailed discussion of the hydrographic conditions along
this transect  is given  in Appendix B; a summary of the most pertinent results
is provided below.

     •  Hydrographic conditions within the upper  150 m of the water
        column  along the transect were typical for summer conditions, as
        deduced by comparison with past studies along the u.b.  tast
        Coast.
      •  A  thin (~20  m)  layer of  relatively  fresh  shelf water extended
        eastward  from  the  continental shelf  such  that the shelf
        water/slope  water  boundary  lies 25  nmi to the west  of the  106-
        Mile  Site.
      »  Despite extensive  temperature/salinity variability  in the  upper
        water column,  vertical  profiles  of  density were  very similar at
         all stations (see  Figure 4-1).   Beneath  a surface mixed layer,  a
         sharp seasonal pycnocline extended  from  roughly  20  to 40 m along
         the entire transect that included the northern portion  of the
         106-Mile Site.
      »  Throughout the region,  vertical  profiles of natural turbidity
         exhibited a subsurface maximum situated within the seasonal
         pycnocline  (see beam attenuation profiles in Figure 4-2).
                                       4-2

-------
                               TEMPERATURE   (C)
                                        -3       .4.        .5
                 1 50
                  72°56-W
Longitude
                         71° 56'W
                                   SALINITY   (PPT)
                 1 5O
                  72°56'W
                                        Longitude
                          7 1 ° SB'W
                    o i*
               5   SO
                                       SIGMA —T
                                             .    .4.
                  1 5O
                   72°56'W
                                        Longitude
                          7 1 ° 56'W
FIGURE 4-1.    VERTICAL TRANSECT OF  HYDROGRAPHIC PROPERTIES ALONG EASTBOUND
               CTD TRANSECT  (SEE APPENDIX B FOR STATION LOCATIONS);
               TEMPERATURE  (UPPER);  SALINITY (MIDDLE); SIGMA-T (LOWER).
                                      4-3

-------
                                         SIGMA-T
                    22

                    0-1—
                   50-
                                                                  28
                 £. 100-

                 r
                   150
                   200
                   .  0.0

                     0
                    50-
                  £. 100-


                  r
                  *-
                  a.
                  uj
                  a
                    150
                    200
                    50-1
                  3. 100-
                    150-
                              0.2
                                    BEAM ATTENUATION tl/m)

                                       0.4       0.6       0.8
                                        OXYGEN  (al/1)
                                                       1.0
                    200-
E 4-2.
COMPOSITE OF  HYDROGRAPHIC PROFILE RESULTS FROM  STATIONS  1,  4

AND  5:   SIGHA-T PROFILES (UPPER); BEAM ATTENUATION PROFILES

(MIDDLE); OXYGEN  (LOWER).
                                      4-4

-------
     •   Dissolved  oxygen profiles  exhibited maximum values  exceeding 6
        mL/L within  the seasonal  pycnocline (see F'9ure 4-2);  percent
        saturation values within  this maximum reached 110%.  These hign
        natural  oxygen levels are associated with high biological
        productivity and relatively high natural turbidity  within  the
        pycnocline.

4.1.1.2  Satellite Thermal Imagery

     As discussed in the site condition report  (  EPA   , 1987e),  the Ocean
Frontal Analyses of the U.S. East Coast, prepared by the Marine
Climatological Investigation of the National Marine Fisheries Service in
Narragansett, Rhode Island,  frontal analyses are marginally useful for
locating ocean thermal  features during summer months.  These weekly,  low-
resolution  analyses provide  a composite view of the Gulf Stream position, the
location of the shelf  water/slope water front,  and the positions  of warm-core
and  cold-core eddies  formed  by Gulf  Stream meanders,  but during summer,
surface warming greatly reduces the  thermal  contrast  between  these  water
masses.
     During a 3-week  period  prior  to the  survey,  a warm-core  eddy named  "87-
E»  approached the 106-Mile Site  from the  northeast,  but  satellite tracking  of
this feature became increasingly  difficult because  of (1)  the weak surface
thermal expression  of the eddy,  and  (2)  extensive cloud  cover which greatly
 reduced the number o' useful satellite images.   Figure 4-3 presents a
 simplified version of the ocean  frontal  analysis for August 31,  1987, the
 first  day of the survey.  This analysis suggests that eddy "87-E" was
 situated only 50 km to the east  of the site, such that currents at the site
 would  be directed toward the northeast,  Hydrographic and  current data
 presented  elsewhere in this report illustrate that water properties and near-
 surface dynamics at the site were being affected by the outer edges of eddy
 "87-E" during the  5-day survey.

 4.1.1.3   Hydrographic Conditions  at  the Site

       Although  the  majority  of the CTD profiles during the survey were made
  within sludge  plumes,  analyses  of data  from stations  outside  of  the  plumes
                                        4-5

-------
     40 N  —
     35 N
                   73 K
                                            70 W
                                                                      65  W
FIGURE 4-3.    SCHEMATIC REPRESENTATION OF WATER MASS BOUNDARIES ALONG THE
               U.S. EAST COAST ON SEPTEMBER 1, 1987, AS DERIVED FROM
               SATELLITE THERMAL IMAGERY.  WARM-CORE EDDIES ARE LABELED "87-
               E",' "87-C", AND "87-F".
                                        4-6

-------
illustrate the background hydrographic conditions  of  the  receiving  water at
the site:
           relatively salfte water of GuUStream origin from the
        periphery of warm-core eddy  87-E.
         properties
         Dissolved oxygen concentrations  were  consistently high  (>6 mL/L,
         and ~110% saturation)  within the seasonal  pyqnocline.
                           4.1.2   Near-Surface Currents

      Near-surface current observations during the survey were obtained from
 (1) expendable current profilers (XCPs), and (2) tracking of surface markers  .
 that were attached to subsurface drogues.  The XCPs were the primary current
 .easurement tool, as they provided accurate, high-resolution profile, of _
 current  shear  from the surface to depths of 1500 m.  Because the XCPs worked
 well   only  one or two drifters were  deployed during each plume tracking
  survey/  The  drifters were  primarily used  (in conjunction with dye) to mark
  the specific  portion  of  the sludge plume that would be  the  focus of the
  individual  survey.                                                            !
       The current profile data have  been analyzed with the  objective of
  resolving the local  current regime  at the  time  of the survey.   As .will  be     ,
  shown below,  the field measurements were adequate for resolving              .

        .   The profile of current  speed and direction over the upper 1500 m of
           the water column;
        •   The  vertical structure  of an  intense current "jet" situated within the
           seasonal pycnocline;
        •   The  rate  at  which  sludge plumes were advected  out  of the site.       :
                                         4-7

-------
4.1.2.1  XCP Current Profile Results

     All six of the expendable current profiler (XCP) probes that were
launched during the survey provided good-quality,  high-resolution current data
from the surface to depths of approximately 1500 m.  Due to an inherent design
limitation, XCPs generally do not provide good quality data within the upper 5
to 7 m of the water column.  Therefore, the results presented below are based
upon current profiles that begin at a depth of 7 m.  Note also that the high-
resolution data have been vertically averaged to provide current observations
at 3-m intervals throughout the profile range.
     Figure 4-4 presents vertical profiles of current speed, current
direction, and water temperature that were acquired during XCP profile 6,
which was launched at the northern boundary of the site on the final day of
the survey, September 4, 1987.  This profile is representative of the current
conditions observed at the site throughout the survey.  Figure 4-4 illustrates
that current speeds were weak (<10 cm/s) and relatively constant below 600 m
(the base of the main thermocline), but speeds above that level generally
increased toward the surface.  The highest current speeds (~0.9 kn) were
observed above 50 mt apparently within the strong seasonal thermocline that
ranged from roughly 12 to 22°C.  Current directions were eastward above 300 m,
and northeastward below that level.
     To illustrate the variability in upper ocean currents during the survey,
Figure 4-5 presents a composite of current profile data obtained from the four
XCPs (3 through 6) launched during the four plume tracking events (DB-1
through DB-4).  This composite of current vectors presents data from six depth
levels to allow detailed comparison between individual profiles.  Each current
vector illustrates the direction of flow using the standard compass
convention, with north pointing upward.  The length of each vector is
proportional to current speed with a scale given at the bottom of the figure.
Note, that the current vectors at 5 m are derived from drifter trajectories
because the XCPs do not provide good quality data at the surface.
     From the composite of current vectors presented in Figure 4-5, the
following characteristics of the local current regime emerge:
                                      4-8

-------
a
a
a
L.
c
o
u
c.
                                                                                                                    O CO
                                                                                                                    a  -
                                                                                                                       UJ
                                                                                                                       
UJ VO
a.
                                                                                                                     UJ O.
U. C£
ou.

(/> UJ
UJ C£
                                                                                                                     o eg
                                                                                                                     figUJ
                                                                                                                     a. a.
                                                                                                                       ,s
                                                                                                                      ee.
                                                                                                                      UJ
                                                          4-9

-------
 OBSERVED  CURRENT  VECTORS
            DB-l  DB-2  DB-3  DB-4
          5n
     Maxlnun
     Current
     ( 1 3- 16n)
      50-250n
      250-500n
     500-1OOOn
    1 0 0 0 - 1 5 0 0 n
   0   25   50
      Cr+* / c O
      t t / S S
             z_ ^    j«
:!GURE 4-5.
                               ^
       ARE REPRESENTED BY AN ARROW POINTING UPWARD.

                   4-10

-------
    •  For all profiles, the maximum current speed was observed at 13 to
       16 m; current directions within this "jet" were highly variable,
       but the easterly component was pronounced.
    •  Currents at 5 m were much less intense than currents within the
       "jet" located only 10 m deeper.
    •  Currents between 50 and 250 m were very constant and directed
       toward the east.
    •  Currents at lower  levels were weak and more variable in direction,
       but  most had  an  eastward component.

    The  most striking  feature  evident  from  the current profile data  is  the
intense current  "jet" situated  at  roughly 15 m.   These intense currents  were
apparently situated within the  seasonal  pycnocline, but further  inspection is
required  to demonstrate this  vertical  correspondence.   Figure  4-6 presents
current and temperature profile data from the  upper 100 m of the  four XCPs
presented in Figure  4-5.  All  four profiles  demonstrate maximum current speeds
within a depth range from 15 to 20 m,  which  coincides with the near-surface
thermocline  (and pycnocline).   This "jet" was  most intense during the first two
days of the  survey,  possibly because of the sharp (8° to 20°C) thermocline that
was observed at that time; warmer (12°C) water displaced the temperature
minimum during the final two days of the survey, causing a weaker seasonal    .
thermocline.  It is  unknown whether the  "jet" was associated with the perimeter
of  the warm-core eddy situated to the east  of the site or if the  "jet"  is a
persistent  feature that will be present  during other  seasons, or  during the
summer every year.   Implications of the  pycnocline current  "jet"  with regard  to
mixing and  transport of sludge dumped  at the  106-Mile Site  are discussed  later
 in  this  report.

 4.1.2.2  Near-Surface Drifter  Results

      Real-time current profile data from the  XCPs provided  valuable  real-time
 information during the plume-tracking operations, but deployment of  near-
 surface drifters proved helpful  (1) as visual markers within  the specific
 portion of  the sludge plume being tracked,  and (2) for determination of
 currents 5  m below  the surface, where XCPs cannot provide good quality data.
                                       4-11

-------
O
*-*
UJ
(T



1
         CM
CM
 I
CD
O
 S
o

CM

O
CO
         O
         CTJ
     8
     UJ
                  o
                  CM
                            O
                            ID
                             O
                             CO
o
o
                             Hld30
                                                        UJ
                                                        CK


                                                        1
                                                        a:
                                                             in
                                                             CM
                                                             o
                                                             CM
                                                m
            Z   "
            o   o
            P   2
            o   ~
                                                     E
                                                     o

                                                     a
                                                     UJ
                                                     UJ
                                                     a.
                                                                                                          O
                                                                                                          LU CO
o
CM
                                                                                    O
                                                                                    (£>
                                                                                      O
                                                                                      03
                                                                                        O
                                                                                        O
                                                                                                           _
                                                                                                          O LU
                                                                                                          QC >
                                                                                                          a. ce

                                                                                                          LU 00
                                                                                                          Of
                                                                                                          =3 LU
                                                                                                      >— O t—
                                                                                                         Cu LU

                                                                                                      LU LU  '
                                                                                                      h- X CS)
                                                                                                      < I— I
                                                                                                      36   CO
                                                                                                         OJ O
      a
      n
  3£


  <


  a
      O

      U
      p

      fM
 o
 a
       I   £
                                   o

                                   Q.

                                   X
                                        c
                                        33
                                                  I
                                                 CD
                                                 Q
                                                          UJ
                                                          ee
                                                          OL

                                                 o
                                                 UJ
                                                              o  .
                                                           u

                                                           I
                                                           to
                                                              O
                                                              r-^
                                                              CM
                                                                                                 LU O
                                                                                                 Of LU  •
                                                                                                 Of S O
                                                                                                 => O 3=

                                                                                                 °i^

                                                                                                 fe5^
                                                                                                 UJ  fc-»  .
                                                                                                 H- O. ^H
                                                                                                 — <_3  I
                                                                                                 t/ix eo
                                                                                                      2:
                                                                                                  §i§
                                                                                                  <_> U. U_
                                                                                                           LU
                                                                                                           OL
                                                                                            O
                                                                                            00
                                                                                               O
                                                                                               O
                                                     4-12

-------
       ,
,f the wat" coiu»,  the drifters provided viable infon.at,on on
rr rru

     . Near-surface (5-.) currents varied great!, over the 3-day period.
     . currents at 30 ..were nuch stronger than 5-. currents during plume
       event DB-1.
     . Hear-surface currents for plujes DB-2 and DB-3 were directed
       toward the east at speeds of  0.6 kn.
     . The drifter results generally agreed with near-surface current
        data from the  XCPs.
      water collected at reference sites was analyzed for water quality criteria
      water, con ec                    total suspended solids, and C. Eerfru^
 (WQC) contaminants  (Table 2-1), iron,  low     v            Clirvev





           prior to or i-ediately following each plu^e-trac ,n, eve    A
           concentrations of «,t trace .etals were unifo^ly low in all
                                     4-13

-------
                     ^
        I  o

        1s/
                                                           i	r
                                         n

                                         is
                                         am
         f e-
         s i


         ii
                                                      J	L
                                                                          uj LU ae
                                                                          ZZO
                                                                           o«»i
                                                                           8*.
                                                                           UJ CO I/O
                                                                           UJ UJ O
                                                                           H- > a-
                                                                           u. UJ
                                                                           » _j o

                                                                           O fl£ UJ

                                                                           UJ H- O
                                                                           C_> U_ Z

                                                                           If S<
                                                                           ce o t—
                                                                           UJ   UJ
i	r

I-
O E
a in
                                                                           UJ
                                                                           ee.
                                                                           CD
                                     4-14

-------
     TABLE 4-1.
                  1987
                                                           .-4.
     Parameter

Metals

   Arsenic, total
   Cadmium
   Chromium, total
   Copper
   Lead
   Mercury
   Nickel
  • Selenium
   Silver
   Zinc

 Organic  Compounds

   Aldrin
   Chlordane
   Dieldrin
   p.p'-DDT
   p,p'-DDE
   a-Endosulfan
   Endrin
   Heptachlor
   Total PCB
   Toxaphene
    a-BHC
    7-BHC

 Total Suspended Solids
 r. perfrinqens
Concentration*
    Range

    fjto/L)

  0.93-1.29
 0.013-0.028
  0.11-0.15
  0.17-0.23
  0.033-0.12
 0.004-0.013
  0.23-0.27
     <.03
 0.002-0.020
  0.02-0.20

    (no/I)

      ND
      ND
      ND
      ND
      ND
      ND
      ND
      ND
    ND-  0.066
      ND
    ND-  9.4
    ND-  2.5

     (mo/I)

 0.16 to 0.93C

   f»/100 ml)
                                                              EPA Marine
                                                             Water Quality
                                                               Criteria
                                                          Chronic
              Acute
2,
9.3

2.9
5.6
0.025
8.3
54

86
43
l.lOOb
2.9
140
2.1
75
410
2.3
95
_
4
1.9
1
8.7
2.3
3.6
3.0
0.2
1,300
90
710
130
34
37
53
10,000
210
  "TWO background   mples collected prior to event  DB-2  are  not  included  m  the
   ranqe   Metals and C. perfringens levels in these two samples were elevated.
   Sam^ng equipment was thought to be contaminated with sludge from DB-1.
  bvalues for arsenic V and chromium VI are reported.
  CHigh"t values were in the particle maximum located in the pycnocl^ne
  doptpctable concentrations were found in two sets of background samples,
   but~are throught to be from carryover in sampling equipment.
                                       4-15

-------
criteria.  Metals levels in background water were lower than previously
reported at the 106-Mile Site (  EPA   ,  1987c,   EPA   ,  1988 ).  The lower
reported concentrations are the result of improved collection and analysis
techniques required for determination of ambient open-ocean levels of these
elements.
     Ambient concentrations of organic contaminants were also uniformly low.
All WQC pesticides were below detection limits.  Analysis  for PCB revealed no
distinct elution pattern by gas chromatography.  However,  a single PCB isomer
was found and quantified in some samples.  Two pesticides  (alpha BHC and gamma
BHC) that are not on the EPA water quality criteria list were identified in
almost all background water samples.  Those compounds were also found
previously in site waters  (   EPA  •, 1987c,   EPA   , 1988 ).
     TSS concentrations in surface waters at the 106-Mile  Site were relatively
constant, ranging between 0.18 and 0.56 mg/L during the survey.  Concentrations
in the pycnocline (starting at 15-m and ending at 20-m depth) were consistently
elevated relative to those at 6-m depth.  The TSS data are consistent with in
situ transmissometry, which showed a particle maximum in the pycnocline.
Several background samples collected after plume tracking  was initiated
contained measurable levels of C. perfringens.  However, no C. perfringens
colonies were found in the control station sampled prior to plume tracking.
Low C. perfringens counts may have resulted from contamination of sampling
equipment during plume tracking events.

                               4.3  BARGE RECORDS

     An essential component in the analyses of sludge plume behavior is the
information contained in the Ocean Dumping Notification Forms submitted to EPA
following each dumping event.  From the information given on these forms, it is
possible to determine the  volume of sludge dumped, the length of the plume, the
speed  of the barge, and the average rate of dumping (volume divided by elapsed
time),   This information is extremely  important for analyses of sludge plume
behavior because the initial size of the plume, the concentration of sludge
within the plume, and the  rate of initial mixing are all highly dependent upon
the dumping characteristics of the barge.
                                      4-16

-------
     Table 4-2 presents a summary of dumping information for the barges which
used the site from August 31 through September 4, 1987.  In addition to the
four plume events (DB-1 through DB-4) addressed in this report, dumping
characteristics are also given for a fifth sludge plume (DZ-1) which was dumped
on the afternoon prior to survey DB-1.  Information for plume DZ-1 has been
included for comparison because the sludge volume and plume length of DZ-1 were
so much greater than the other four plumes surveyed.
     Figure 4-8 graphically presents information from Table 4-2 to illustrate
significant differences between the individual dumping events.  The upper panel
in  Figure 4-8 presents a plot of sludge volume dumped versus barge speed for
the  five dumping events.  This figure illustrates a number of differences
between the various dumping events: dumping event DZ-1 had much greater sludge
volume  than the other  four events  (DB-1 through  DB-4), whereas barge speed was
the lowest of all five'barges; sludge volumes of events DB-1, DB-2 and DB-3
were nearly  identical, but barge speed for  DB-3  was significantly greater than
for all other barges.
     Of more  importance  in the analysis of  plume behavior are  (1) the  actual
sludge  dumping  rate,  and  (2)  the  initial  concentration  of sludge within the
plume.  The  average  rate  of  sludge dumping  can  be calculated  from each barge
record  by dividing the total  volume of sludge dumped  by the time spent during
dumping.   The initial  concentration of sludge within  the plume  is related  to
 the amount of sludge that is  dumped along the entire  track  (plume)  length.
 The volume of sludge per meter of track  length  can  be obtained  by simply
 dividing  "the volume  of sludge by the total  length of  the plume.
         The lower panel  of Figure 4-8 presents  a plot of these two  calculated
 quantities,  dumping  rate (gallons/min)  and  sludge volume per  unit  of track
 length (gallons/meter),  for each of the  five dumping  events.   Dumping event
 DB-1 was the only one of the five events in which sludge  dumping rates exceeded
 15,500 gal/min.  In terms of sludge dumped per unit of track  length, event DB-1
 also had the highest values.  In contrast,  event DB-3 had  the lowest value of
 sludge per unit of track length, and presumably, this plume would initially
 have the  lowest sludge concentrations (and highest dilutions) of all plumes
 surveyed.  As will  be shown  in following sections,  sludge volume per unit track
  length is  an  important parameter  affecting of plume dilution.
                                       4-17

-------
TABLE 4-2.  SUMMARY OF DUMPING INFORMATION FOR BARGES DUMPING
            SEWAGE SLUDGE AT THE 106-MILE SITE FROM
            AUGUST 31 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 4, 1987
Survey
Date
Tug
Barge
Sludge
Volume
(gal)
Barge
Speed
(kn)
Dumping
Time
(h)
Plume
Length
(nmi)
Average
Dumping
Rate
(gal/min)
(gal/meters)
(m3/m)
DZ-1
8/31
Buster
Bouchard
Sea
Trader
9,200,000
• 4.2
13.9
58.3

11,018
85
0.32
DB-1
9/1
Alice
Moran
Spring
Creek
3,291,428
5.3
3.1
16.5

17,506
108
0.41
DB-2 DB-3
9/2 9/3
Ester Kate
Moran
Tibbetts Morris
Brook Berman
3,328,831 3,342,893
5.0 7.3
3.8 4.7
19.2 34.0

14,473 11,939
94 53
0.36 0.20
DB-4
9/4
Dragon
Lady
Leo
Frank
1,309,090
5.7
1.7
9.5

13,091
74
0.28
                                    4-18

-------
           10
        D
        cn
        LJ
        O

        UJ
        O
        O
        in
       8-
             6-
             0
               0
                                            DZ-1
                                 DB-2
                                                        DB-3
                                            DB-V
                                               DB-4
                     2     3      45     6     7

                         BARGE SPEED  (kts)
                                                                 8
         20000
 E
\
 o

 .LJ
         18000-
         16000--
0   14000--
Z
D_
          12000-
      O
          10000
                0
                                             • DB-1
                                               •  DB-2
                                   DB-4
                           DB-3
                                              DZ-1
                  25      50      75      TOO     125

                       GALLONS / METER OF TRACK
                                                                 150
FTPIRF 4-8     BARGE DUMPING CHARACTERISTICS FOR THE FOUR PRINCIPAL PLUME
             SURVEYS  (DB-1 THROUGH DB-4), AS WELL AS A BARGE (DZ-1) THAT
             DUMPED ON'THE DAY PRIOR TO SURVEY DB-1.
                              4-19

-------
                           4.4  SLUDGE PLUME BEHAVIOR
                     4.4.1  Lateral and Vertical Spreading
     To determine the short-term mixing and dispersion characteristics of
sludge plumes that were dumped at the 106-Mile Site, it is first necessary to
quantify their spatial scales and the rates at which they vary.  The following
sections present analyses of sludge plume width and thickness, as determined
from aerial photography and shipboard profiling with the CTD/transmissometer
system.

4.4.1.1  Lateral Spreading

     Plume width data were obtained from four separate plumes, and repeated
observations within each plume allow analysis of the rate at which plumes
spread laterally.  Plume width data were obtained from horizontal profiling for
two plumes (DB-2 and DB-4) and from aerial photography for three plumes (DB-1,
DB-2, and DB-3).
     Figure 4-9 presents a summary of results obtained from aerial photographs
of three plumes.  The upper panel presents estimates of plume width versus time
during the first 2 min following sludge dumping from the barge.  The results
from plumes DB-1 and DB-3 were each obtained from a single photograph of the
sludge plume immediately behind the barge.  The data were derived by (1) using
the known speed of the barge to convert from distance-behind-the-barge to
time-since-dumping, and (2) measuring the plume width (corrected for aircraft
elevation) at various distances behind the barge.  This figure illustrates that
plume DB-1 was initially much wider than plume'DB-3 (29 m versus 11 m,
respectively), but their rates of spreading were very similar over the 2-min
duration of the analysis.
        The average rate of spreading during the first 2 min of plumes DB-1 and
DB-3 was 43 cm/s.  This period of rapid plume spreading and intense mixing is
attributed to wake dispersion, where the initial mixing is driven by (1)
turbulent dispersion within the wake of the barge (proportional to the speed of
the barge), (2)  the velocity at which the sludge is being dumped or pumped
from the barge, and (3) density differences between the sludge and the
                                      4-20

-------
  en
Q


£

LJ
       75
       50--
       25--
        0
                  25
                                              DB-3
                         50      75      100     125     150


                            TIME (seconds)
   to
   l_
   
-------
receiving water.  Csanady  (1981) and other investigators have estimated plume
spreading rates during this period of initial mixing, but the observations
presented here represent direct measurements from which accurate mixing
calculations can be based.
     The lower panel of Figure 4-9 presents additional measurements of plume
width over a 1-h period following each event.  These results were derived from
repeated aerial photographs of the plume at the location of the dye patch.
This ensured that variations in plume width were associated with the rate of
p'lume spreading, rather than variations in width at different positions along
the plume.  On this and subsequent figures, T=0 h represents the time at which
the survey vessel initially stopped behind the barge to deploy the drogues and
dye, and begin profiling measurements.  This T=0 h for surveys DB-1 through DB-
3 was generally 2 to 3 min after that specific portion of sludge had been
discharged from the barge.
     The lower panel of Figure 4-9 illustrates that the three plumes had
roughly the same widths, and their rates of spreading were remarkably similar.
Plume DB-2 was the widest of the three plumes; plume DB-3 was initially the
narrowest but its width was equivalent to that of DB-1 within 1 h of dumping.
The fact that plume DB-3 was the narrowest of the three plumes is consistent
with the computed volume of sludge discharged per unit of plume length (lower
row in Table 4-2): 0.20 m3/m for plume DB-3 compared to roughly 0.4 m3/m for
plumes DB-1 and DB-2.
     Horizontal profiling of turbidity proved to be an accurate method for
determining plume width because the natural turbidity of the near-surface
receiving water was low and remarkably constant within the dumpsite.
Measurements of plume width were obtained by (1) identifying the beginning and
end of the turbid plume water from the horizontal profile data, (2)
calculating the distance along the vessel track, and (3) making a cosine
correction for the  angle between the vessel track and the orientation of the
plume axis.
     Plume width estimates from horizontal profiling within plume DB-4 are
presented in Figure 4-10.  The upper panel of Figure 4-10 illustrates that,
during the first hour after dumping, plume widths at 5 m increased quite
sharply to values of roughly 350 m.  Measurements during the next 1/2 h
revealed that plume widths at 5 m stopped  increasing, and widths began to vary
                                      4-22

-------
       to
       l_
       cu
I
I—
Q


LJ
          400-
          300-
          200 T
       LT:   iooT

             o
              0
                                 DB-4  Towed Data
                                    5m  •	•
                                    10m A	A
                                    15m •	•
                 50
                                                  \

  100       150

  TIME  (minutes)
200
250
          500
       0)
           400-
            004-
           200 +
LJ
S
ID
_J
Q_
                                        Towed Data — 5m
                                        DB-2  A	A
                                        DB-4  •	•
               0
                20
40      60      80

   TIME (minutes)
  100
 120
FIGURE 4-10.
       ANALYSIS  OF PLUME WIDTH  FOR PLUMES DB-2 AND DB-4:  RESULTS OF
       TOWED DATA FOR DB-4 (UPPER); COMPARISON OF TOWED DATA FROM
       PLUMES DB-2 AND DB-4 (LOWER).
                                  4-23

-------
 significantly from tow to tow.   Subsequent tows (between 1.5 and 2.0 h)  at
 greater  depths indicated that plume widths at 10 m were roughly equivalent to
 those  at 5 m,  and  plume width at 15 m was less than at  shallower depths.   As
 time progressed, plume widths became equal at all  three levels  (~220 m),  but
 this width was significantly less than the maximum observed  width of the  piume
 (at T*l  h).   Beyond 3  h,  parcels of the plume could be  tracked,  but  meaningful
 measurements  of plume  width  could no longer be obtained.
     Because  sludge concentrations certainly had not  increased within  the
 plume, the reduction in  plume width  (and  volume) indicates that  sludge had
 escaped  from  the specific  volume (plume transect)  that  was being  surveyed.
 The vertical  current shear,  imposed  by the strong  currents within  the  seasonal
 pycnocline, was apparently the mechanism  for this  dispersion.
     The  lower panel of  Figure 4-10  presents  a  comparison of plume widths for
 plume surveys  DB-2  and DB-4,  as  derived from  horizontal profile  results from a
 depth of 5 m.  This  figure illustrates  that plume  DB-4 was roughly 50. percent
wider than plume DB-2 which was  the  broadest  of plumes DB-1 through  DB-3.
Within 1 h, minutes  after discharge, plume DB-4 had reached widths in  excess of
300 m.
     The results of  the various  aerial and horizontal profiling analyses of
plume width are summarized below.

        The rates  of lateral  spreading were generally similar for the
        four plumes studied,  although their initial widths differed by a
        factor of  five or more.
        Analyses of plume width revealed four stages of lateral
        spreading:
        1)  From 0  to ~5 min, turbulent mixing due  to wake momentum
            resulted in rapid spreading with rates  of approximately
            40 cm/s.  Turbidity within the plume was high,  yet  boluses of
            clear  receiving water were observed within the plume.
        2)  From 5  to ~30 min, gradual  mixing due to buoyancy and oceanic
            mixing  processes  resulted in spreading  rates of ~5  cm/s.
            Turbidity was relatively homogeneous across  the axis  of the
            plume.
        3)  From ~30 min to 2-4 h, lateral spreading of  the surface plume
            was slow (~1 cm/s),  but the base of the plume  was  elongated
            due to  vertical shear in the seasonal pycnocline.   Thus,  the
            cross-sectional area  of the plume increased  rapidly  although
                                     4-24

-------
             the width  of  the  surface  plume  remained nearly  constant.
             Turbidity  values  decrease greatly during this phase.
         4)   A  few hours after dumping (actual time dependent  upon mixing
             conditions),  the  quasi-linear plume broke  into  parcels  of
             various  sizes and concentrations.
         The  effective  lateral  spreading rate during the first hour
         following a  dump  was  approximately  5 cm/s; beyond 1 h, spreading
         rates  were less than  1 cm/s.
         Both the  width and turbidity  concentration within plume DB-4 were
         much greater than the characteristics of the other three plumes
         surveyed,  which suggests that the dumping rate for plume DB-4 was
         significantly greater than that of  the other plumes.
4.4.1.2  Vertical Spreading

     Vertical profile measurements were effective for determining the depth to
which sludge plumes penetrated during the summer survey.  Results from plumes
DB-1 and DB-3 were used for analyses of the physical processes that govern the
vertical spreading of sludge plumes.
     Figure 4-11 presents a composite of six vertical profiles of turbidity
(beam attenuation) obtained for plume DB-3.  These profiles represent a time
series of vertical profiles that extends from the beginning of the survey
(T=0 h)  to the last profile within the plume (T=8.5 h).  At T=0 h within the
axis of the plume, high turbidity values (>5 m-1) extended downward from the
sea surface to a depth of approximately 9 m, below which turbidity dropped
sharply, reaching background values at a depth of about 13 m.   At 0.2 h after
dumping, mixed-layer turbidity values had decreased slightly (to <5 m-1) but
relatively high values were seen to penetrate to depths of about 14 m.  After
0.9 h,  the plume had penetrated to 16 m and mixed-layer turbidity values
continued to decrease.
     These results indicate that, within the first hour, plume DB-3 penetrated
to a depth of roughly 15 m, which corresponded with the top of the seasonal
py.nocline.  Turbidity concentrations were relatively constant throughout the
mixed layer, even though concentrations were observed to decrease significantly
during the first hour.
                                     4-25

-------
  10'


L
i

  30-
  40
                  KAM ATTENUATION (!/•)
                   a              4
                              t = 0.0 h
                                                      to
                                                    5
                                                     30-
                                                     40
                                                                    KAM ATTENUATION II/.J

                                                                     '             4
                                                                                  t »  02 h
  10-
§
  30-
                     ATTENUATION  (t/«»
                  a             4
                             t = 0.9 h
                                                     10-
                                                   x
                                                   i
                                                     30-
                                                     40-
                                                                   BCAM ATTENUATION tl/«|
                                                                    a              4
                                                                                 t =  1.8 h
  10


t
I**
£

i
  30-
                 BCAM ATTEHUTIOM (!/•!
                  2              4
                             t  = 3.1  h
                                                    30-
                                                    40
                                                                   KAM ATTENUATION ll/al
                                                                    2             4
                                                                                 t = 8.5 h
   FIGURE 4-11.
                   COMPOSITE OF  VERTICAL TURBIDITY  (BEAM ATTENUATION)  PROFILES
                   HADE WITHIN PLUME  DB-3; TIMES AFTER DUMPING  FROM THE BARGE ARE
                   INDICATED.
                                            4-26

-------
     Beyond 1 h, a number of vertical profiles of plume DB-3 revealed that an
appreciable quantity of sludge was being transported laterally away from the
main, surface portion of the sludge plume.  Vertical turbidity profiles within
this displaced portion of the plume revealed large subsurface maxima in
turbidity (1.8 h in Figure 4-11).  The profile taken at T-1.8 h illustrates a
concentrated layer of sludge centered near a depth of 11 m, with maximum sludge
penetration to 18 m; surface turbidity values above this layer of sludge were
only slightly above background.
     An additional six vertical profiles were obtained during the remaining 7 h
of event DB-3.  Some of these profiles were made within the surface expression
of the plume, but after a few hours, the surface expression of the plume was no
longer evident, and horizontal profiling was used to locate concentrated
portions of sludge water, in which vertical profiles were made.  The lower-
right panel of Figure 4-11 presents a turbidity profile that was made 8.5 h
after sludge dumping from the barge.  This profile reveals a subsurface
turbidity maximum near 12 m, above which lies a mixed layer of very dilute
plume water.
     Vertical profile results from survey DB-1 were similar to those presented
for survey DB-3.  A.limited number of tows at a depth of 15 m in sludge plumes
DB-2 and DB-4 suggest that these plumes had similar vertical characteristics to
DB-1 and DB-3.
     In summary, the vertical profile results from the individual plume events
indicate that

     *  The vertical distribution of suspended solids (as turbidity) in
        the four plumes surveyed were very similar.
     *  Initial mixing  (within 5 min after Dumping) resulted in sludge
        penetration to roughly 10 m.
     •  Vertical mixing over the first 2 h resulted in sludge penetration
        to  roughly  18 m, which corresponded with the top of the seasonal
        pycnocline.
     *  After 8 h for plume DB-3, the highest concentrations of sludge
        were  located at a depth  of  12 m, which suggests that dilution
        processes above  (due to  winds and waves) and below-this level  (due
        to  the  strong current  shear within the "jet") were stronger than
        at  the  12 m depth.
                                      4-27

-------
     *  There was no  indication that sludge settled to depths greater than
        20 m, with penetration beneath the seasonal pycnocline.

                      4.4.2  Sludge Dilution and Transport

     Calculations of  sludge dilution are necessary to determine that LPCs are
being met at the site 4 h after sludge disposal, and to estimate concentration
of WQC contaminants when those contaminants cannot be measured directly in
sludge plumes.  Plume volume, transmissometry, TSS, and chemical tracer data
were used in the calculation of sludge dilution for plumes monitored during the
survey.  Dilution calculations presented in subsections 4.4.2.1 (plume volume)
and 4.4.2.2 (transmissometry analysis) provide estimates of dilution for the
entire plume.  In contrast, dilution estimates based upon analyses of TSS data
(subsection 4.4.2.3)  and chemical tracer data (subsection 4.4.2.4) from
discrete water parcels yield significantly lower dilutions, as shown below.

4.4.2.1  Dilution Based On Plume Volume

     The ratio of plume volume to the volume of sludge dumped into the plume
provides the most basic method for calculating the dilution of sludge.  The
volume of the plume per meter of track length was calculated from the observed
width and thickness of the plume, multiplied by a 1-m length.  The volume of
sludge dumped per meter of plume length was estimated from the total volume of
sludge dumped, and the overall length of the plume (Table 4-2).   This rate may
vary greatly along a  single plume, but for the purpose of this analysis,  the
average dumping rate  is treated as a constant, average value.
     This simple volume dilution analysis has inherent limitations because it
does not require conservation of mass, but it does reveal  a number of basic
results which are summarized below:
     •  Dilution 3 min after discharge from the barge was
        approximately 2500:1 for all plumes.  Dilutions ranged from
        6,000:1 to 12,000:1 0.5 h after discharge.
     •  Dilution progressed at a constant rate for roughly 1.0 h,  but.
        rates of dilution varied by a factor of 3 for the plumes
        surveyed.
                                      4-28

-------
     *  For plumes DB-1,  2,  and 3,  the dilution  (plume volume)  and the
        rate of change of dilution  (increase in  plume volume)  both
        varied inversely  with the effective dumping rate;  dilutions
        were highest when less sludge was dumped along a unit  track
        length.
     *  Because plume DB-4 had the largest plume volume and highest
        turbidity concentrations, we can deduce  that the dumping rate at
        the beginning of  the plume (the location of the survey event)
        was significantly greater than the average dumping rate (0.28
        m3/m) over the entire plume length.
     •  Dilution estimates based upon plume volume calculations were
        not useful >1.0 h after discharge because the current  jet
        within the seasonal  pycnocline appeared  to advect sludge
        constituents away from the bottom of the plume.

4.4.2.2 Dilution Based On Transmissometry Data

     Turbidity (transmissometry) data were also  used to calculate dilution.
Horizontal transmissometry profile data from DB-4 were calibrated to
corresponding TSS data and were used to estimate a time-series of mass loading
in the plume throughout the monitoring event. Mass loading information was
then compared to initial  mass loading calculated from barge discharge records
and average sludge particulate concentrations (Santoro and Fikslin, 1987) to
derive sludge dilution.
     The relationship between TSS and transmissometry data was calculated for
each dumping event to verify that light transmission monitoring techniques
accurately reflected particle concentrations in  sludge plumes.  To develop the
relationship,  individual  TSS sample concentrations from each of the plumes were
plotted against the beam attenuation obtained for that sample.  Figure 4-12
shows the  relationship between these two parameters for each plume.  Although
there is much  scatter in the data, the slopes for each relationship are
similar.   AH  plumes display a relationship that is consistent with the
expected  response  of the transmissometer to suspended matter.   Within the
statistical  limits  of this  relationship, it appears that the sludge from these
four  disposal  events gives  similar beam  attenuation, suggesting that the
transmissometer  output can  be  used to  directly  estimate sludge concentrations
with  sewage  sludge plumes.   However, most  of the data  reflect sampling of low
turbidity  water,  and  hence,  statistically  derived  slopes of the relationship
                                      4-29

-------
                                                                         o
                                                                        U5
                                                                         o

                                                                         V
                                                                         E
                                                                         3
                                                                         V
                                                                         QD
                                                                    l-o
                                 So
                                 a »•»
                                 UJ Z

                                 uj
                                 fez*
V6uj '
1/Buj 'SSI
                            o
                            3
                            C
                            V
                            E
                            o
                            0)
                            CO
                                                     in   o   in    o
                                                                               uj x ca
                                                                               3 < o
                                                                               P UJ
                                                                               UJ CO O
                                                                               Q.Z
                                                                               527
                                                                               O >— '
                                                                               CC. h-
                                                                               LU
                                                                               oc.
                                4-30
                                               V'5uj 'SSi

-------
between total suspended solids and turbidity may have considerable error.  A
best estimate of the relationship of TSS to beam attenuation is used to
calculate mass balance based on transmissometry data.
     Figure 4-13 presents a time series of the average particulate
concentration and the particulate mass loading within a complete transect of
plume DB-4, based on transmissometry data.  This figure illustrates that total
suspended solids are being lost during the time between the repeated crossings
of the plume.  The rate of sludge loss from the plume appears to start
gradually, but after about 1 h, the loss is quite rapid.
     Roughly 20 min after discharge, the total mass of suspended solids with a
1-m wide transect of the plume was approximately 42 kg (estimated TSS
concentration of 15 mg/L and a plume cross-sectional area of roughly 2800 m2).
This load was reduced to 7 kg about 1.5 h later, which corresponds with an 83
percent loss of solids over this time period.
     The explanation for this rapid loss of sludge is that the strong currents
within the seasonal pycnocline were an effective mechanism for lateral
transport of sludge away from the axis of the plume.  During plume event DB-4,
currents above 10 m were relatively weak (<15 cm/s), but between 10 and 15 m,
currents were in excess of 40 cm/s within the current "jet."  In addition to
this strong vertical shear in current speed, the direction of the "jet" (~125°)
was significantly different from the direction of the near-surface flow (~60°).
The combined effect of this speed and directional shear apparently had a major
effect upon the transport of sludge within plume DB-4.  The results indicate
that the bottom of the plume was rapidly and continually being advected away
from the main body of the plume, but this layer was so thin (<5 m) that it was
not evident during the horizontal profiling operations.
     To determine the effect that this current "jet" had on the lateral
dispersion and dilution of the plume, the calculated TSS load information can
be used to obtain an independent calculation of plume dilution versus time.
Using the particulate load (41,760 g) calculated for the transect of plume (DB-
4) at 20 min after dumping, we obtain the following results.

     *  If the effective dumping rate at the position of the plume
        transect was equal to the average rate over the entire plume (0.28
        m3/min, see Table 4-2), then the initial TSS concentration of the
        sludge within the barge would have been (~149,000 mg/L).  Because

                                      4-31

-------
    cn
    If)
    CO
       20
       15--
       10--
        0
       50
    en
    .x


    Q
    <
    O
    _J

    GO
       40--
30 J-
20 r
        10-
                                              DB-4
                                              Towed Data
                                    DB-4

                                    Towed Data
          0     20     40    60    80    100   120    140   160

                             TIME (minutes)
                 20  '	40     60    80    100    120   140    160


                            TiME (minutes)
-ISURE 4-13.
      TSS CONCENTRATION AND TSS LOAD CALCULATED FROM TRANSMISSOMETRY

      WITHIN A 1-ra HIDE TRANSECT OF THE PLUME.


                        4-32

-------
       this TSS concentration is excessively high,  we suspect that the
       instantaneous dumping rate was much higher than the average value.

    •  If the initial TSS concentration of the sludge from plume DB-4
       (from the New York 26th Ward facility) was ~25,000 mg/L as
       reported by Santoro and Fikslin (1987), the particulate load
       estimate can be used to calculate an effective dumping rate of
       1.67 m3/m.  This rate is roughly 6 times the average dumping rate
       (0 28 m3/m) for the entire plume length.  Using an average TSS
       concentration of 15 mg/L within the plume at 20 min, the average
       plume dilution would be ~2,000:1, a low value for the entire
       plume.  ,

    •  In the absence of direct measurements of  (1) the TSS concentration
       within the barge and  (2) the actual dumping rate from the barge
       accurate plume-averaged dilution rates cannot be determined.  The
       results do, however, suggest that  (1) the effective dumping rate
       of plume DB-4 was roughly  twice the average rate for the plume,
       and  (2) the initial TSS concentration of  the sludge may have been
       on the order  of 90,000 mg/L, or 2  to  3 times the published
       estimates.

     •  Given the  large uncertainties  in the  above method,  rough estimates
       of  the plume-averaged  dilution for plume  DB-4  are:

               ~6,000:1    20  min  after dumping
              ~15,000:1     1  h  after  dumping
              ~80,000:1     2  h  after  dumping
             ~100,000:1     3  h  after  dumping
4.4.2.3  Dilution Based on TSS Data


     Dilution was also estimated by dividing typical sludge TSS concentrations

(Santoro and Fikslin, 1987) by the measured increase in TSS concentration over

background levels.  Although actual TSS data from sludge in the barges would be
more appropriate for the calculation, the difficulty in obtaining these samples

for the survey precluded this approach.  However, the use of published data

does provide mixing  estimates to compare with estimates determined by other

methods.
     TSS  concentrations  in  sludge  plumes at T=0  h ranged from  17 to 32 mg/L,

corresponding  to initial  sludge  dilutions  ranging from  1,030:1 to 810:1
 (Table 4-3).   Thus,  dilutions  based  on  TSS  data  from discrete  samples are  lower
 than  dilutions based upon  the  entire plume.   Flocculation  of organic matter  and

 nietal  species, occurring when  freshwater mixes with saltwater  (Stumm and

                                      4-33

-------
    TABLE 4-3. TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS IN SLUDGE PLUMES AND ESTIMATES
               OF  INITIAL DILUTION AT THE 106-MILE SITE
                  Total Suspended Solids,
                   Concentration (mq/L)
Plume    Sludge*
                    Plume Maximum
                       at T-0 h
Background^
 Increase
    Over     Dilution
Backgroundc    at T=0
DB-1
DB-2
DB-3
DB-4
18,100
18,100
26,400
24,200
17.4
19.2
32.6
24.8
0.18
0.23
0.18
0.34
96
83
180
73
1,050:1
1,010:1
810:1
1,030:1
      from Santoro and Fikslin, 1987.
t»Mean of DB-1, DB-3, and DB-4 6.0 m background TSS results.
CTSS concentration for plume divided by background concentration.

DB-1 = Sludge from Wards Island sewage treatment plant, New York City, NY.
DB-2 - Sludge from Wards Island sewage treatment plant, New York City, NY.
DB-3 3 Sludge from Port Richmond sewage treatment plant, New York City, NY.
DB-4 - Sludge from 26th Ward sewage treatment plant, New York City, NY.
                                     4-34

-------
Morgan, 1981) and a process similar to that occurring naturally in estuaries.
may increase the apparent particulate concentrations relative to actual
dilution.  If the process is occurring, initial mixing calculations based on
TSS may underestimate the extent of initial mixing.  However, variations in
sludge dumping rates or discrepancies between actual sludge TSS content and
that reported in Santoro and Fikslin (1987) may also account for the difference
in mixing calculated by TSS concentrations.
     The change in TSS concentration in the plume following dumping is
presented in Figure 4-14 for plumes DB-1 and DB-3.  The TSS data suggest that
after 0.5 h, the decrease in TSS with time was linear for plume DB-1.  Based on
the rate of  decrease (linear regression fit; r= 0.9, n= 14), plume DB-1 would
reach  ambient TSS concentrations in approximately 3 h.  However, at the end  of
both monitoring events, measured TSS levels remained elevated over ambient
levels.  TSS concentrations determined at the end of each dumping event were
used to calculate final dilution of the sludge (Table 4-4).  Dilution
estimated ranged from  11,000:1 to  25,000:1.
     The TSS data displayed high variability among  sample replicates collected
as the ship  drifted through sludge plumes.  Because of the  consistency of  light
transmission data over the  same time period, the  TSS variability probably
reflects the difficulty  in  collecting  discrete samples in and  at the edge  of a
sludge plume rather than  TSS heterogeneity  in  a given parcel of the plume.
The data demonstrate the  difficulty  in obtaining  adequate replication  using
conventional sampling  techniques.   Because  of  the variable  nature of TSS data,
the above  calculations were based  on  individual samples  rather than average
values of  several  replicates.                     ,

 4.4.2.4   Dilution  Based  on Chemical  Tracer Data

      Chemical  signatures of sludge to trace the  sludge  as  it was  dispersed at
 the site were also used  to measure dilution.   Copper,  iron, lead,  and  zinc were
 selected as chemical  tracers based on their relatively  high concentrations in
 sludge dumped at the site (O'Connor et al., 1985) and their ease  of analysis.
 Chemical tracer data are used to support and confirm nearfield fate analyses
 based on other measurement techniques.  Additional analyses were, performed on
                                       4-35

-------
            20
            15-
        en
        tn
        in
    O
            10-
             5-
                  8
                §
  0
   0.0
                     0-5     1.0     1.5     2.0     2.5     3.0

                                       TIME, h
                                                         3.5
FIGURE 4-14A.   TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS CONCENTRATIONS MONITORED DURING DUMPING

               ^NJnS?'U?LUDGE FROM WARDS ISUND SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT
               ntH TuKK..  Nil.                                            *
35


30 -*
    jt

25-
                  o
                                                                DB3
        o
10-      3

 5-   °
                                    §
             0.0'
	1	.0
                        2.0         3.0

                           TIME, h
                                                         4.0
 IGURE 4-14B.  TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS CONCENTRATIONS MONITORED DURING DUMPING
              EVENT DB-3 (SLUDGE FROM PORT RICHMOND SEWAGE TREATMENT PLAN,
              NhH YORK, NYJ.
                                    4-36

-------
     TABLE 4-4.  TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS IN SLUDGE PLUMES AT THE
                 106-MILE SITE MONITORED AFTER DUMPING
Plume
DB-1
DB-2
DB-3
DB-3
DB-4
DB-4
Time
After
Dilution
(h)
2.88
4.3
4.18
4.35
4.72
4.72
TSS
Depth Concentration
(m) (mg/L)
6
6
6
10.4
6
10.4
1.06
0.95
2.5
1.9
3.5
1.6
Increase
Over
Background*
4.9
3.1
12.9
9.2
10.3
3.6
Dilution
of Sludge^
2.1x104
2.5x104
1.1x104
• 1.5x104
2.4x104
1.9x104
aCalculated by dividing final sludge plume TSS concentrations by ambient
 TSS values.
bCalculated by dividing source levels (Santoro and Fikslin,  1987)  by final
 sludge plume TSS concentrations.
                                     4-37

-------
chemical tracers to determine which, if any, element is more suitable for
tracing the sludge.
     Dilutions at T=0 h for two dumping events were calculated by comparing
concentrations of chemical tracers in sludge plumes with average concentrations
of those tracers in the sludges being dumped (Santoro and Fikslin, 1987).  As
with similar calculations based on TSS data, actual tracer data from sludge in
the barges dumping at the site would be more appropriate for mixing
calculations, but the difficulty in obtaining sludge samples for the summer
survey precluded this approach.  However, the use of published data does
provide mixing estimates to compare with estimates determined by other methods.
As with TSS, the variability in chemical tracer data made it difficult to
calculate mass balances.  Dilution calculations are presented below.
     Concentrations of the metal tracers, copper, lead, and zinc, in sludge
plumes DB-2 and DB-3, and estimates of dilution are presented in Table 4-5.
The calculated initial dilution varied both between plumes and for each tracer
within a plume.  Initial dilutions calculated for DB-2 ranged between 2,600:1
and 6,300:1.  Initial dilution calculated for DB-3 was lower, ranging between
400:1 and 1,100:1 dilution depending on the element used in the calculation.
Dilutions calculated from samples collected at T=4.3 h range from 25,000:1 to
52,000:1 for plume DB-2, and from 1,900:1 to 6,300:1 for plume DB-3.
     Metal concentrations in the receiving water within the sludge plumes DB-2
and DB-3 increased between 90:1 and 2,340:1 above background at T=0 h.  The
amount of increase varied with the sludge being monitored and with each metal
for a given sludge.  No one tracer gave consistently high relative increases
between the two events being monitored, reflecting the variability in metal
concentrations of the source material.  However, of the three metals analyzed
at TsO h, copper showed the lowest relative increase over ambient
concentrations for both dumping events.
     Metal concentrations within the plumes monitored behaved similarly after
initial dilution and decreased exponentially with time as illustrated in Figure
4-15.  The mean exponential decay rate derived from the rate of decay for each
element for plume DB-3 was relatively constant (0.51 * 0.02 h-1).  Thus, under
the conditions found at the 106-Mile Site during this one event,  the
concentration of tracers in the sludge plume decreased by a factor of 2
(halved) every hour following disposal.
                                      4-38

-------
     TABLE 4-5.  ESTIMATES OF DILUTION AT T=0  h AND T=4.3 h BASED ON
                METAL TRACER CONCENTRATIONS
T=0 h
Source'
Event Concentrations3

DB-2
DB-3

DB-2
DB-3

DB-2
DB-3'

52,
50,

20,
19,

35,
48,

700
900

700
300

100
400
T=4.3 h
Initial Initial
Sludge Sludge Sludge Sludge
Plume Dilution Plume Dilution
Concentrations Concentrations

14
50

3
51

13
48

.7
.0

.3
.5

.4
.4

3,600:
1,000:

6,300:
400:

2,600:
1,000:
Copper.
1
1
Lead. \
1
1
Zinc. \
1
1
£Q/L
2
11
tq/L
0
10
*q/L
1
7
.1
.2

.4
.4

.3
.7
25
4

52
1

27
6
,000:
,500:

,000:
,900:

,000:
,300:
1
1

1
1

1
1
aSantoro and Fikslin,  1987.
                                     4-39

-------
    60


    50


    40 A






    20-


    .0--
                                                         •  6m
                                                         010m
                             \
                               V

                       D.O       2.0      4.0       6.0

                                      Time after disposal, h
                     60
                  5
a.
"5
                     40-\
                     20-
                                                         •  6m
                                                         o 10 m
                            \
                              \
                                                            '-+•
      0.0       2.0       4.0       6.0      8.0

                     Time after disposal, h
                     60
                     40 f
M
"5
£  20 T
                                          8.0      10.0
                                                                    10.0
                                           • 6 m
                                           010m
                            \
                              \
                       0.0       2.0       4.0       6.0

                                      Time after disposal, h
                                          8.0
10.0
i:J?T 4-15.      COPPER,  LEAD, AND ZINC CONCENTRATIONS  MONITORED  DURING
                DUMPING  EVENT DB-3 (SEPTEMBER 3, 1987).   DASHED  (--) LINE
                DEPICTS  MEAN EXPONENTIAL FIT.

                                        4-40

-------
     To determine which, if any, element was significantly more useful as a  •
chemical tracer of sewage sludge, metal concentrations from individual samples
were plotted against one another to determine how well the results for one
metal predicted the behavior of the other tracer metals.  Metals were plotted
against iron, the metal with the highest concentration in plumes DB-2 and DB-3
at T=0 h.  A strong correlation between iron and the other three metals
analyzed was found for each plume event (Figure 4-16).  These results show
striking consistency in metal behavior within each plume and tentatively
suggest that analysis of one metal can be used to predict the nearfield fate of
the  other metals  in sludge plumes over similar time frames, provided metal
ratios  are established for each plume.
     Figure 4-16  also' illustrates that metal ratios may be used to develop.
sludge  "signatures" that can be used to trace and identify individual sludge
plumes  throughout the nearfield, short-term monitoring,  the characteristic
ratios  have significant potential for  identification  of individual sludge
plumes  when multiple barges  are dumping at the site.  The signature concept
also has potential  for  long-term fate  studies  (i.e.,  monitoring the change in
sediment trap metal ratios against oceanic  "control"  values) and  potential  for
monitoring the  operation of  individual  treatment plants in relation to  the
effectiveness of  point-source  control  measures.

4.4.2.5 Plume  Transport

      Knowledge  of the  time required  for sludge plumes to  leave the 106-Mile
 Site is of critical concern  because  water quality  criteria must not  be
 exceeded at  any time outside of the  site.  In  addition to the  use of current
 profile data for prediction of rates of sludge plume advection,  continual
 contact with the plumes during the four sampling events (DB-1  through DB-4)
 yields a direct measurement of the time that each of the plumes crossed the
 site boundaries.  Figure 4-17 illustrates the movement of sludge plumes DB-1
 and DB-2 during  the individual plume-tracking events; Figure 4-18 illustrates
 the movement of  plumes DB-3 and DB-4.  The information shown for each plume
 includes  (1) the positions of initial  (T=0 h) and final contact with the plume,
 (2) elapsed time (in hours) since dumping from the barge, and (3) the initial
 orientation of the plume at the initial  position of  the tracking event.
                                       4-41

-------
                   5
                   o  20 ••
                                      100    150    200
                                         Total Fe, pq/L
                                          250
                            300
                               •4
                               50
100    150
   Total Fe.
                                   200
250
300
FIGURE 4-16.
                                        i	•  -	,.	<...•	i	 ^ O
                                50     100    150     200
                                         Total Fe, pq/L
                                          250
                             300
DIAGNOSTIC TRACER  RATIOS FOR SLUDGE PLUMES DB-2  (SLUDGE
FROM WARDS ISLAND  SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT, NEW YORK  CITY,
NY) AND DB-3  (SLUDGE FROM PORT RICHMOND SEWAGE TREATMENT
PLANT, NEW YORK CITY,  NY).
                                      4-42

-------
                  33"
                  39* O'N
                 38'55'N
                                                           DB-1
                            t-4.0
                          t-0
              .  INITIAL
               ^ PLUME
                 HEADING
"I
  i
  i
                     72 5' W
                                               106-Mile Site
                                           72  O1 H
                                                                 71 55'  W
                 39' 2'N
                 39  O'N
                 3B 55'N
                                                           DB-2
                                t-0

                               INITIAL
                               PLUME
                               HEADING
                                                  t - 4.1
                                               106-Mile Site
                     72  5' W
                                           72  0'  X
                                                                 71 55'  X
FIGURE 4-17.
SUMMARY  OF PLUME AOVECTION FOR PLUMES DB-1 AND DB-2.  HOURLY
POSITIONS OF THE PLUME ARE INDICATED, AS WELL  AS THE INITIAL
HEADING  OF THE PLUME.
                                          4-43

-------
                    39  2'N
                    39  O'N
                    38 55'N
                                                              DB-3
                                                  106-Mllt Site
                                 INITIAL I
                                 PLUME
                                 HEADING
                       72  5' W
72' 0' W
                   t-8.6
                                                                   71 55' W
                    39  2'N
                   39  O'N
                   38 55'N
                                INITIAL
                                PLUME
                                HEADING
                              -1	1	1
                                                         r-	1	r
                                                             DB-4
                                                        t-3.3
                       72  5'
                                                 106-Mile Site
                                            72  0'
                                                                  71*55' W
FIGURE  4-18.    SUfHARY-OF PLUME ADVECTION FOR  PLUMES DB-3 AND  DB-4.  HOURLY

              ,  POSITIONS OF THE PLUME ARE INDICATED, AS WELL AS THE INITIAL
                HEADING  OF THE PLUME.
                                        4-44

-------
     The  results  of  plume  advection  can  be  summarized as  follows:

     •   Plume  DB-1 remained  within the site for  at  least  4  h  after  it  was
        dumped at the northern  boundary  of  the site.
     •   The  remaining three  plumes crossed  the eastern  boundary  of  the
        site within  2 to 3 h after they  were dumped near  the  center of the
        site (near 72°02'W).
     •   Plume  advection toward  the east  was in direct opposition to the
        expected  mean (westward)  flow direction  of  slope  water at the
        site.   Eastward advection was probably related  to the anticyclonic
        flow around  the warm-core eddy situated  to  the  east (or  southeast)
        of the site.
     *   Had  real-time current data been  used to  direct  dumping operations
        toward the western boundary  of the  site,  all plumes would have
        remained  within the  site  boundaries for  at  least  4  hours after
        dumping.
     The current  regime that was  encountered during the survey may  have been
atypical  for the  106-Mile Site, but  during  these events,  strong  near-surface
currents can move sludge plumes out  6f the  site  in  a few  hours.   The observed
currents may have represented a worst-case  for plume advection because the
currents were directed across the narrow,  east-west dimension of the 106-Mile
Site.  However, during the passage  of a  warm-core Gulf  Stream eddy, near-
surface currents  can reach speeds 3  to 4 times greater  than those observed
during  the survey,  and plume residence times within the site  may be reduced to
an hour or less.
                        4.5  HATER QUALITY MEASUREMENTS

     A primary concern of the 106-Mile Site monitoring program is to verify (1)
that the adverse impacts of sludge dumping on water quality at the site, as
measured by increased metal and organic contaminant concentrations, and
increased pathogen counts, are not in excess of those permitted by the ocean
dumping regulations and permit requirements; and (2) that sludge dumping has no
significant effect on dissolved oxygen levels or pH at the site.  The survey
addressed water quality issues through the analysis of water samples collected
in  sludge plumes for WQC contaminants. Although samples for the analysis of
contaminants  for which there are  EPA water quality criteria were collected in

                                      4-45

-------
all four sludge plumes monitored, only two sets of samples, those from DB-2 and
DB-3, were analyzed.  Additional monitoring was conducted to verify that the
disposal of sludge does not cause a significant depletion of dissolved oxygen
content of the water and to monitor the levels of the  microbiological tracer,
C. perfringens; pH was not monitored.  A summary of water quality findings is
presented below.  A complete set of water quality data is presented in
Appendix D.

                  4.5.1  Comparison to Water Quality Criteria

     Results of the analysis of samples collected within plumes DB-2 and DB-3
indicate that all organic contaminants and all but two metal contaminants
(copper and lead) were below water quality criteria approximately 4 h after
disposal.  Copper levels exceeded WQC in both plumes studied, but lead
concentrations exceeded WQC only in DB-2.  Mercury concentrations in both
sludge plumes were within a factor of 2 of WQC at 4 h, whereas nickel
concentrations were within a factor of 2 of WQC after 4 h in plume DB-3 (Table
4-6).  Concentrations of other metal WQC contaminants and all organic WQC
contaminants were well below WQC levels in both sludge plumes.
     Sludge plume DB-3 was advected outside the site within 4 h, and although
water samples were not collected at the site boundary, concentrations of
contaminants in the plume could be calculated based on chemical tracer.  Using
the mean tracer dilution rate for sludge plume DB-3 (Section 4.4.4) and
reported contaminant concentrations in sewage sludge (from the Port Richmond
sewage treatment plant), (Santoro and Fikslin, 1987), copper met marine WQC 5.2-
h after disposal, whereas lead, mercury, and nickel met WQC 4.1 h, 3.25 h, and
0.9 h after disposal, respectively.  Because sludge plume DB-3 was advected
outside of site boundaries at 2.5 h, calculated concentrations of copper,  lead,
and mercury exceeded WQC outside the site.  Other metal and organic
contaminants were calculated to be below marine WQC when the plume was
transported beyond site boundaries.
     Because Santoro and Fikslin (1987) presents contaminant information for
all 19 sewage treatment plants using the 106-Mile Site, the data can be used
to predict contaminant  levels in site waters assuming sludges from other
plants were Humped under the same conditions, resulting in the same initial and
                                      4-46

-------




•f LU
-J O
LU '_%
il^C
>< oe
O LU
o. •— >
at as

*'.* ^^ _^
CO M ••
o — i o
< LU
as ee
CM LU LU
1 H- O
O 3C O

VO LU LU
55s
_J < <

LU < LU
C.? Q. t—
25 LU —
Boo
*/? H- ^_
» £ «
to i^ «c
Z LU O-
UJ «J
£-« OS
Z LU
ee i »—
=5 10 <:
 0 36
Z LU O.
Z LU
^U ^"
LU < >— i
Z O
-J LU
U. < LU
O to <_>
Z S LU
o to
to •— to
oe ° 0
<: as —
Q- LU (—
O t OS
c_j <: i—

^
0
^*

«*J
CO
L__
n™



















«
e
^o
+j
(O
w
e
u
'O

















g*

e
i*^

01



ja
o.

z


O)
u.



g




U


s


<




<*
^^_
_J
*e5>
c

















^
en
•*^















. ^« •
§o>
•MO
•^ >*- II
h— < H—


0)
'c.5 ^~ t.
I S"-S.
(^ O



IT) PO CM
PO CM r»
CM O «3" LD
-H — < *-* CM
§O
VO
CM O Cft
•— 1 CM P*- IO
CO
O 00
• • •
v V V *"
CO C7« CO
PO «er LD
^- vn PO ^o
O CM O «•>
VD O W
^- — CM
PO VD «• **?
o o -< co


r-^ o
PO CM VO •
PO PO «• <
V— 4 ^H ^ ^Z

«• into
PO CM —<
»•«• CM CM eyi
CM PO — < CM

— If)
^ o o;
O CM v£> O
u->
^r — • o
PO PO O
O — < «3- PO
o o o en

J3
PO w* ^".
er> cr> o
O O — v£>
PO

vo un PO
O O CM * PO
0 00 "C CM
4^

CO f ^
PO — i PO O
• • •
^^ *3* ^^ ^"
4-»
^z
?
° R"*. 0
l^ L^^ ^^
CM PO 4>
1 1 *±
co co J2
O Ol ^
























•o
•M
u
•5
c>
0)
0!
-i
t
0.
O)
u
X
0)

•1—
I/)
•^
c
(O
0)

u ••-
•I- If)
•— >>
3 fO
~& c
M-
o o>
c cy>
fX3 CZ
QJ •<-
%£
4-47

-------
 continuing dispersion as determined for event DB-3.  The average concentration
 of eight metals in sludge from each treatment plant was used to determine the
 T=0 h concentration (assuming initial dilution of 1000), and the mean
 exponential rate of tracer decay in the plume (0.51  x 0.02 h-1, Section
 4.4.2.4) was used to calculate the expected concentration of each metal in the
 plume 4 h after disposal.  These estimates were compared to EPA WQC.  For the
 19 sewage treatment plants reported in Santoro and Fikslin (1987),  18 would not
 meet the marine water quality criteria for copper under the conditions
 prevailing during dumping event DB-3.   The results of this exercise are
 presented in Table 4-7.
      Because the calculated  rate of tracer decay with time in  plume DB-3 is
 based on few data points,  and because  the  published  data may not reflect
 changes  in contaminant  levels in current sludges,  the results  in Table 4-7  must
 be considered  an estimate.   TSS  data show  a more rapid  rate of  dispersion
 during dumping  event DB-3, and using TSS dispersion  rates,  fewer sludges would
 exceed HQC.  Because different oceanographic conditions  may be  more or less
 dispersive,  caution must be  used  in  drawing conclusions  from dispersion  rates
 calculated  from  dumping event DB-3.  However,  Table  4-7  does illustrate  that
 of  the contaminants for which there  are marine water quality criteria, only
 arsenic  and cadmium are not  of concern vis-a-vis the 106-Mile Site  monitoring
 program.  Calculations show  that  other elements, to  varying  degrees, exceed or
 approach marine  WQC 4 h after disposal of one.or more typical sludges  at the
 106-Mile Site.
                            4.5.2  Dissolved Oxygen

     Dissolved oxygen concentrations were monitored continuously during
vertical and horizontal profiling operations using an in situ oxygen probe
interfaced to the CTD/transmissometer profiling system.  Analyses of oxygen
data from within the various plumes revealed extremely small  reductions
(0.3 ml/L) of oxygen during the first hour after sludge discharge,  but the
magnitude of these variations was well below the expected accuracy  of the
sensor (±0-1 ml/I).   These oxygen reductions could only be attributed to the
sludge plumes when the data were analyzed along horizontal transects through
the plumes.

                                      4-48

-------
    TABLE 4-7  NUMBER OF SLUDGE PLUMES NOT MEETING EPA WATER
               QUALITY CRITERIA 4 h AFTER SLUDGE DISPOSAL AT THE
               106-MILE SITE.  NON-COMPLIANCE BASED ON MEAN
               CONTAMINANT  CONCENTRATIONS IN SLUDGES FROM 19 SEWAGE
               TREATMENT PLANTS IN THE NEW YORK METROPOLITAN AREA
                 Santoro and Fikslin,  1987), AND MEAN DISPERSION
               RATES (FROM  METAL TRACER  DATA, SLUDGE PLUME DB-3)
Element
                                             Number of Sludoe Plumes
                                    Above WQC
                    Within 3x WQC
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Mercury
Nickel
Lead
Zinc
 0
 0
 0
18
 5
 0
 4
 0
 0
 0
 2
19
13
 1
 8
 1
                                       4-49

-------
     Figure 4-19 presents a stackplot of horizontal profile measurements versus
distance along a transect through plume DB-4.  The top of this figure
illustrates the high turbidity (beam attenuation) within the plume.  Visual
inspection of the salinity, sigma-t, and oxygen profile results reveals reduced
values for each parameter at the same location as the high turbidity values.
These results demonstrate that sludge plumes are less saline and have lower
oxygen values than receiving water.  The observed temperature variability is
presumed to be associated with natural variability, as the sludge apparently
had temperatures equivalent to the receiving water.  Thus, salinity is the
controlling factor in plume density, and therefore, the plumes were less dense
than the receiving waters near the sea surface.  This information also supports
the observation that sludge plumes did not sink beyond the seasonal pycnocline.

                         4.5.3  Clostridium perfringens
                                                   , ''i
     A microbiological tracer of sewage sludge, C. perfringens, was found at
elevated levels in sludge plumes throughout each plume tracking event
(Table 4-8).  For one sludge plume  (DB-1), C. perfrinqens levels throughout the
survey remained too numerous to count, indicating that C. perfrinqens may be
the most sensitive sludge tracer used on the survey.  The data also indicate
that C. perfrinqens concentrations  in sludges may vary dramatically, suggesting
that levels of pathogens in sludges may also vary.  C. perfrinqens is a spore-
forming anaerobe thought to be associated with forms of food poisoning  (Higgins
and Burns,  1975).  Because it exists as a cyst, this species is thought to be
more viable than other bacteria and is useful as a sewage tracer (Cabelli and
Pederson,  1982).  C. perfrinqens levels in  sludge plumes at the site may not
reflect levels of other more  harmful pathogens.   C. perfrinqens was not found
in any out-of-site control samples  analyzed.  Complete C. perfrinqens data are
presented  in  Tables C-5  through C-8 in Appendix D.
                                      4-50

-------
                                LENGTH OF TRANSECT (meters)
                              100
                                      ISO
                                               200
     o
     I
  2 -


  1 -


  0


21.70


21 .ta


21.M


21.55


21 JO







 315



 SS.4
      O
          2X0
          4.U
           4.50
FIGURE 4-19.
       VARIATIONS IN WATER PROPERTIES ALONG A TRANSECT  OF PLUME DB-4
       THAT WAS MADE 55 MINUTES  AFTER DISCHARGE FROM  THE BARGE.
       REDUCTIONS IN SALINITY, SIGMA-T, AND OXYGEN  CORRESPOND WITH
       HIGH TURBIDITIES  (BEAM ATTENUATION) WITHIN THE PLUME.
                                     4-51

-------
     TABLE 4-8. CONCENTRATIONS OF C  perfrinoens IN THE SLUDGE PLUMES
                AT T=0 AND BETWEEN 4 AND 7 h AFTER DISPOSAL   (RFSIII TS
                ARE BASED ON THE MAXIMUM OBSERVED IN THESE* 0F
                REPLICATE SAMPLES FOR THE SAMPLE PERIOD.)
         DB-1

         DB-2

         DB-3

         DB-4
TNTCa

>20?c

257

TNTC
TNTCb

292d

150f

 209
3006
TNTC - Colonies too numerous to count.
"Number of colonies estimated as >1500/100 mL
^Number of colonies estimated as >820/100 mL

           '           repl1cate' coloni« ^ two of the three replicates
   r
dCollected at T=4.3 h.
eCollected at 10 meters, T=7.25 h.
^Collected at 6m, at T=4.18 h.
9Collected at 6m, T=4.72 h.
                                     4-52

-------
               4.6  OBSERVATIONS OF CETACEANS AND MARINE TURTLES

     Five species of cetaceans, including two species of whales and three
species of dolphins, were observed in slope and shelf-edge waters.   There were
no marine turtles observed during the survey.  A complete discussion of results
is included in the site condition report (   EPA  ,  1987f).
                                      4-53

-------

-------
                                5.0   CONCLUSIONS
                      5.1  DISCUSSION OF NULL HYPOTHESES
     Monitoring the nearfield fate of sludge plumes is one component of Tier 2
monitoring activities presented in the 106-Mile Site monitoring plan (EPA
1987a).  Nearfield fate monitoring addresses both permit compliance and impact
assessment.  It addresses permit compliance because the permits for disposal of
sludges at the 106-Mile Site will stipulate that Water Quality Criteria (WQC),
where they exist, may not be exceeded within the site 4 h after dumping and
outside the site at any time.  When WQC do not exist, the permits will  require
that the waste concentration not exceed a factor of 0.01 of a concentration
known to be acutely toxic after initial mixing, i.e., the limiting permissible
concentration (LPC).  The combined conformance to LPCs and WQC is thought to be
protective of the marine environment.
     Nearfield fate (and short-term effects) monitoring also addresses the
potential for impacts within the immediate vicinity of the site and in the
short-term, defined for convenience as 24 h.  Nearfield fate determinations
address the horizontal and vertical behavior and movement of sludge within and
immediately adjacent to the site.  Monitoring the behavior and movement of
sludge immediately after disposal is necessary to confirm assumptions made
about dispersion and dilution when issuing permits.
     The 106-Mile Site monitoring plan (   EPA   , 1992a) uses site and waste.
characteristics to predict possible impacts of sludge disposal and formulate
testable null hypotheses that these predictions  suggest.  Results of the
summer survey are discussed in terms of hypotheses addressing issues
associated with Tier 2 of the monitoring plan.   The hypotheses H03 through H09
are divided into two categories:  permit compliance and impact assessment.

                       Permit Compliance:   Nearfield Fate

     H03:  Concentrations of sludge and sludge constituents outside
           the site are below the permitted  LPC and WQC at all times.
           The summer survey demonstrated that sludge dumped in the
           site can be transported outside site boundaries .before all
                                     5-1                                '

-------
      constituents are diluted below LPC and WQC.  This was
      demonstrated for the sludge constituents copper and lead
      and are predicted for mercury and nickel.  Organic sludqe
      constituents were significantly below WQC.

 H04: Concentrations of sludge and sludge constituents within the
      site are below the permitted LPC and WQC 4 h after
      disposal.

      Although oceanographic conditions at the site during the
      summer survey were considered dispersive,  concentrations of
      the sludge constituents copper and lead  exceeded WQC 4 h
      after disposal.   WQC for mercury  would also be  exceeded in
      sludge plumes, from some sewage treatment  plants  using  the
      5 1 L 6 •                   '•

 H05:  Pathogen levels  do  not  exceed  ambient levels  4  h  after
      disposal.

      The microbial tracer, C. perfrinoens. exceeded ambient
      levels  in  all sludge plume water collected  4  h or more
      after  disposal.  C. perfrinoens is not a pathogen, but  a
      conservative microbial  tracer of sewage;  therefore  C
      perfrinoens data are not conclusive proof that pathogen
      levels  are being exceeded 4 h after disposal.  The data
      suggest  that a suitable replacement for C. perfrinoens be
      developed for future nearfield fate surveysT       -
                  Impact  Assessment;   Nearfield Fate

H06: Sludge particles do not settle in significant quantities
     beneath the seasonal pycnocline (50 m)  or to the 50-iu depth
     at any time, within the site boundaries or in an area
     adjacent to the site.

     Sludge penetration below 20 m was not  observed on the
     S™2'.?V!2 * h^fter Slu?9e dischar9e.   Because of the
     strong  jet" in the pycnocline during  the time of the
     survey,  sludge could have been carried  away  in the
     pycnocline and potential  settling not  observed.
0
                th\re9lon.  vertical  profiles of natural  turbidity
               a subsurface  maximum  situated within the seasonal
     pycnocline.  This  suggests  that  surface-dumped particulate
     matter may accumulate within  the seasonal pycnocline durinq
     summer and coexist  with  natural  pi anktonic species.

     The  concentration of sludge constituents within the site
     does not  exceed  the LPC  or WQC 4 h after disposal and is
     not  detectable  in the site  1  day after disposal
                               5-2

-------
          Concentrations  of  the  sludge  constituents copper  and  lead
          exceeded WQC 4  h  after disposal.  WQC  for mercury would
          also be exceeded  in  sludge  plumes from some  sewage
          treatment plants  using the  site.  Although sludge could  not
          be tracked for  more  than  9  h  after  disposal,  calculations
          of sludge dispersion, indicate that  all  measured sludge
          constituents would reach  ambient concentrations within 1
          day after disposal.

     H08:  The concentration  of sludge constituents at  the site
          boundary or in  the area adjacent to the site does not
          exceed the LPC  or WQC  at  any  time and  is not detectable  1
          day after disposal.

          The summer survey  demonstrated that sludge dumped in  the
          site can be transported outside site boundaries before all
          constituents are  diluted  below LPC  and WQC.   This was
          demonstrated for  the sludge constituents copper and lead
          and predicted for  mercury and nickel.   Organic sludge
          constituents were  significantly below  WQC.   Calculations of
          dispersion indicate  that  all  measured  constituents would
          reach ambient concentrations  within 1  day after disposal.

     H09:  The disposal of sludge does not cause  a significant
          depletion in the  dissolved  oxygen content of the  water nor
          a significant change in the pH of the  seawater in the area.

          The observed depression in  dissolved oxygen  levels in
          sludge plumes is  minor and  at the limit of instrument
          resolution.  The  observed depression of dissolved oxygen is
          that predicted  by  simple  mixing models, and  not the result
          of depletion caused  by chemical oxygen demand (COD) or
          biological oxygen  demand  (BOD). During the  summer survey,
          pH was not monitored in sludge plumes.
                   5.2  EVALUATION OF MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES
            (

     Because the September 1987 survey was the first field  application  of

proposed technical  guidance for plume-tracking activities to be conducted  as

part of the 106-Mile Site monitoring program,  an objective  of the survey was  to

evaluate methods that may be used in the future by EPA or by permittees.  The

following methods (originally presented in Section 2.0)  are evaluated in terms

of the success of the September 1987 survey:
                                     5-3

-------
                K*         of a sludge Plume with dye and
  surface and subsurface drogues.

  Both dye and drogues worked well  for identifying  a portion of
  a sludge plume for surveying.   Dye mixed  in  from  the  OSV
  Andgrssa resulted in only a surface expression, and thus
  could not be used to monitor dispersion.   Dye introduced  from
  the  barge would be more useful  as  a sludge tracer.
 U?Uli°r-IH  t!?e m?vePent and  dispersion of the marked sludge
             Swift *Servations  froro the OSV Anderson and I
 mo                      were successful in monitoring the
 movement and dispersion of the plume.  Aerial photo-
 ufo^?^""06 Proved to be a usef"l tool for determining
 lateral dispersion and orientation of the plume.

 Acquisition of in situ transmissometry and acoustics data
                               data *•
 Transmissometry was the most sensitive and reliable real-
 time tracking method and provided the most data for
 nearfield fate analyses.  Horizontal  transmissometry
 profiling (transmissometer on a V-fin depressor)  allowed
 continuous profiling while the ship was  under  power and
 making  reciprocal  passes through the  sludge  plume.
 Acoustics pr filing (27 and 300 kHz)  of  two  sludge  plumes
 I   EPA   ,  I987f)  provided good quality  data.   However  the
 data were not quantitative,  and because  the  acoustics
 profiler  and the transmissometer could not be  used  at the
 same time on the OSV Anderson,  acoustic  profiling was not
 hSrZmt0!! the SUr-ey'   If aPP™P^ate transducers can be
 hull -mounted,  acoustic  profiling may provide useful
 supplemental  information to  transmissometry.  However
 aSS??r°nrn5?i?OWe?  °f ^ransmi'ssometry for plume tracking,
 method    profl1in9  1S not  recommended as a primary survey


 For the September 1987 survey, seawater was pumped throuoh a
conventional UV fluorometer.  Air bubbles in  thS seawSe?
an3 ?hP°^!!UHlly injer^ered with fluorescence  measurements
and the method was  abandoned before its utility for plume
tracking was  uly  investigated.  A flurometer  would be
                             5-4

-------
Collection of samples for chemical and biological tracers
and total suspended solids to determine actual
concentrations of sludge components and dilution of these
components.

The chemical tracers and TSS proved to be valuable
measurements for determination of nearfield fate of disposed
sludge.  Without these measurements, transmissometry data
could not be related to actual contaminant levels at the
site.

Acquistion of satellite-derived ocean frontal analyses, CTD
profiles, and measurements of current shear to determine the
oceanographic conditions that may have impacted the data
generated during the survey.

In addition to providing critical information for post-
survey data analysis, the above oceanographic measurements
also provided data that was extremely useful at sea for
predicting sludge plume behavior.  CTD profiles and current
shear measurements proved necessary for interpretation o.f
plume-tracking data.

Acquisition of real-time navigation data to support plume-
tracking activities.

Real-time navigation provided critical information necessary
for positioning the ship during plume tracking.  By showing
the positiot of the ship in relation to the plume, real-time
navigation was an indispensible aid to the plume-tracking
survey.
                             5-5

-------

-------
                                6.0 REFERENCES

Bisson, J.W. and V.J. Cabelli.  1979.  Membrane Filter Enumeration
      Method of Clostridium perfrihgens.  Applied Environmental
      Microbiology.  37:55-66.

Cabelli,.V.J. and D. Pedersen.  1982.  The movement of sewage sludge
      from the New York Bight dumpsite as seen from Clostridium
      oerfringens spore densities.  In:  Conference Proceedings of the
      Marine Pollution Sessions of Oceans '82.  Pp. 995-999.  Marine
      Technology Society and the Institute of Electrical and Electronic
      Engineers Council on Ocean Engineering, Washington, DC.

Csanady, G.T.  1981.  An analysis of dumpsite diffusion experiments.
      In: Ocean Dumping of Industrial Wastes.  Ketchum, Kester, and Dark
      (eds.), Plenum Press, NY.  12:109-129.

Cranston, R.E. and J.W. Murray.  1977.  The determination of chromium
      species in natural waters.  Anal. Chem. 99:275-282.

Danielsson,  1., B. Magnusson, S. Westerlund,  and K. Zhang.   1982.  Trace
      metal  determinations in estuarine waters by electrothermal  atomic
      absorption spectrometry after extraction of dithiocarbamate
      complexes into freon.  Anal. Chim. Acta 144:183-188.
EPA.
 EPA.
 EPA.
 EPA.
 EPA.
1987a.  Strategy for Plume Tracking Methods at the 106-Mile Site.
Environmental Protection Agency Oceans and Coastal Protection
Division (formerly OMEP), Washington, DC.

19875.  Analytical Procedures in Support of the 106-Mile Deepwater
Municipal Sludge Site Monitoring Program.  Environmental
Protection Agency Oceans and Coastal Protection Division (formally
OMEP), Washington, DC.

1987c.  Final Report on Analysis of Baseline Seawater and Sediment
Samples from the  106-Mile Deepwater Municipal Sludge Site.
Environmental Protection Agency Oceans and Coastal Protection
Division (formally OMEP), Washington, DC.

1987d.  Draft Initial Survey Report for  Plume Tracking  Survey for
the  106-Mile Deepwater Municipal Sludge  Site in Support of the  EPA
106-Mile Site Monitoring Program.  August  29 - September 5,  1987.
Environmental Protection Agency Oceans and Coastal Protection
Division  (formally OMEP), Washington, DC.

1987e.   Site Condition Report  for  Plume  Tracking  Survey for  the
106-Mile Deepwater Municipal Sludge  Site in  Support  of  the EPA
106-Mile Site Monitoring  Program.  -August  29 - September  5,  1987.
Environmental Protection  Agency Oceans and Coastal Protection
Division  (formerly  OMEP), Washington, DC.
                                       6-1

-------
 EPA.
EPA.
EPA.
EPA.

 1987f.   Final  Report  on  Analytical  Results of Samples Collected
 During the  1985  North Atlantic  Incineration Site (NAIS) Survly
 Environmental  Protection Agency Oceans and Coastal Protection
 Division  (formerly OMEP), Washington, DC.

 1988.  Final Report of Analytical Results of the 106-Mile
 Deepwater Sludge Dumpsite Survey-Summer 1986.  Environmental

 OMEP)   Wash?nnton°CDCnS ^ C°aStal Protection Division (formally

 1992a.  Final Draft Monitoring Plan for the 106-Mile Deepwater
cUSJ°i!!n  Slud9e site-  Environmental Protection Agency.   EPA 842-
o— 32— 009.
                         *               Plan for the 106-Mile Deepwater
                Sludge Site Monitoring Program.   Environmental
      Protection Agency.  EPA 842-S-92-010
      ?n «J2Jt!; inJ^JS8"";    9?7'   Picomolar  mercury measurements
      in seawater and other materials  using  stannous  chloride  reduction
            ™S!afeJ?ld amal9amation  with gas  phase  detection.  Mar.
            tUi2Z7— 243.
        n        ,R'5  B-rns>   1975>  The C^mistry and Microbiology of
      Pollution,  Academic  Press, New York, NY.   148 pp.

        rnfM M-Jke-s J-£- Pau1' and V-J- B1erman-  1985-  A
      strategy  for Monitoring  of Contaminant Distributions Resulting
      From Proposed Sewage Sludge Disposal at the 106-Mile Ocean
      Disposal  Site.   Mar. Env. Res. 16:127-150.
             atd'J- F^slin.  1987.  Chemical and lexicological
                                                   in

                                   Aquatic chemistry'
                                    6-2

-------
APPENDIX A

-------

-------
                 A.I  DATA QUALITY  REQUIREMENTS AND OBJECTIVES

     The data requirements for chemical analysis are summarized in Table 3-2.
Accuracy of the chemical analyses were determined by analysis of procedural
blanks and certified reference materials, when available.  Samples were also
spiked with known amounts of the analyte of interest and the recovery of the
spike monitored to determine extraction efficiencies.  For organic compounds,
both field and laboratory extraction efficiencies were monitored through
addition of surrogate compounds.  Precision of analysis were determined by
analysis of duplicate samples.
     The accuracy of Clostridium perfrinqens and total suspended solids (TSS)
results could not be determined from independent standards because certified
reference standards are not available.  Analysis of spiked samples for these
parameters is not feasible.

                          A.2 QUALITY CONTROL RESULTS

                         A.2.1  Total Suspended Solids

     Analysis of duplicate TSS samples showed precision of less than 10
percent relative percent difference (RPD).  The precision was consistent
throughout the wide range in TSS concentrations; e.g., TSS mean = 24, RPD =
6.0; TSS mean = 0..79, RPD = 3.8.  Six blank filters processed in the field
resulted in mean TSS concentrations of 0.3 * 0.9 mg/L, reflecting the
difficulty in obtaining accurate TSS determinations of low turbidity water.
The procedural blank values are thought to result from changes in humidity
affecting both tare and final filter weights.  TSS results were not corrected
for blanks.  The precision was within the objectives for the analysis of TSS.
However, because of tne absence of reference material, accuracy could not be
determined.

                                  A.2.2 Metals

       The method detection  limits,  determined during the  analysis.of the
samples  for  trace metal concentrations are listed in Table A-l.  All detection
                                       A-l

-------
limits are sufficient to determine the concentration of the metals analyzed at
background oceanic levels.  The detection limits obtained are within the
objectives listed for this project, except for arsenic and mercury.  The
detection limits achieved for these two elements were, however, sufficient to
provide detectable concentrations of these elements for all samples analyzed.
Results of procedural blanks (Table A-2) indicate most metals were analyzed
without significant contaminant contribution to the sample.  A consistent
contribution from the analytical procedure was found for iron, mercury, and
zinc.  Sample results were corrected for these blanks.  Results of duplicate
analyses indicate excellent precision (<10 percent as the RPD) was obtained in
the laboratory (Table A-3).  Silver (67% as the RPD) and cadmium (24% as the
RPD) had relatively poor precision due to the extremely low concentrations
found in the samples.  Chromium results were also more variable (RPD = 24).
     Recovery of matrix spikes (Table A-4) was excellent, generally ranging
between 80 and 120 percent of the known addition.  Lower recoveries of silver
(51%) were observed, and iron and lead recoveries were variable, with
                                               V '              .  '            ' , •  i
significant overrecovery observed in several samples.  Metal recoveries from
certified seawater samples (Table A-5) were higher than observed for matrix
spikes.  Silver is not certified in standard seawater, therefore no estimate
of accuracy is available from this quality control check.

                            A.2.2 ORGANIC COMPOUNDS

     Method detection limits for the pesticides and polychlorinated biphenyl  .
(PCB) analysis are shown in Table A-6.  Detection limit objectives were met
for these compounds.  Recoveries of organic compounds were determined at two
steps of the extraction procedure, during field extractions and within the
laboratory.  Field recoveries were determined by the addition of a known
amount of decachlorobiphenyl to each sample.  The recoveries determined for
this compound were low and variable (Table A-7), ranging between 6 and 58
percent.  Sample results are not corrected for this extraction efficiency.  In
tue laboratory, a suite of compounds were spiked into a sample and the recovery
efficiency determined (Table A-8).  Recoveries were excellent, with the
exception of cc-endosulfan and /S-endosulfan.  The results indicate that the
cleanup step (silica-alumina column chromatography) necessary to achieve the
                                      A-2

-------
required detection limits allowed successful recovery of all  analytes except
for the two with low recoveries.
                                       A-3

-------
                               OO CM 00 CM VO «3- VD CO
                                                              CM r-* f*.
 fcO
 LU
 1/1
    to
    UJ
a: a.
UJ
to co
to
LU
_J
CO
                •—  o
                •— CB
                >
                fO H-
                to
                                   i   i
                                            I   I   I
                                                              CO CM PO
                                                               I  I  I
                                                              oococo
                                  IO O O O «-H •—I ^N «—4    ,—I _H _|
                                  V V V V     V     V     V V V  i
                                                             un LD in
                                                              V V V  t
                                -Q -a .a .a

                                CM CM CO 5

  I   .1  I  I   I   I   I   I   I     O O O O
                                                                r»» in
                              coeoeooooaococo
                              OOOOOOOOO    CMCMCM

                              •"•* ^^ *™^ '•^ '•^ •"•* ^H »~^ 9*H    ^^ *•* t«ri
                              VVVVVV     VV    VVV
                              i   i   i   i   i   i   i  t  i     V  i   i
                               oo r-» in

    Illlllll    OOCOI
                                                                                 U  U
                                                                                .=  10
                                                                                2  u
                                 I   I   I   I   I   I
                              I   I   I  I  I   I   I   I
                                                                    I   I
                                                            vo
U
                               O) r—

                               4-> fO

                               ra 3
                                                                               •— o
                                                                               •M 2
                                                                                C  £-
                                                   a> ^£
                                                  J=  C
                                                  •M  (O

                                                   o la
                                                                               S-  I-
                                                                               2  S
                                                                               a>  a.
U  C
*J  fO
T3  
-------
TABLE A-l. METHOD DETECTION LIMITS FOR ANALYSIS OF SAMPLES
           FOR TRACE METAL CONCENTRATIONS DURING PLUME-
           TRACKING EXERCISES SEPTEMBER 1987
    Analyte
Detection
Liarit 0»g/L)
    Arsenic
    Cadmium
    Chromium
    Copper
    Iron
    Lead
    Mercury
    Nickel
    Selenium
    Silver
    Zinc
  0.68
  0.0009
  0.009
  0.006
  0.06
   .009
   .002
  0.03
  0.03
  0.002
  0.003
0.
0.
                                  A--

-------
 LU
 LU
 tO
to

LU
to
t—l
tS)
to
                    to
                CL a.
               to
                             •^ CM CM
                              I  I  I
                                «-i *r    in
                                 I   I
                              I   I   I
                            in r*. CM    rs.
                            oo CM MD    in
                             i  t  i
                             i  i  i
                                         CM
                                        CM
                                        o>
                             iii    vo
                             i  i  i
                            -^ CM OO    «-i
0)
u
    •»
                                                              O  0)
                                                     in    m —
                                                     CM O CM U

                                                     r- CM «er m '
r»»o CM o  -
  •   •   •   • 65
O VO O «*•
~<    CNJ CM *O


CM PO co ro CM
 I  I  I  I   I

O O O O O

QJ  tt)  tt)  O QJ
s  e  e  e e
33333
                                  A-6

-------

^t
LU
U.
O
^
|
.a*
t—
S
eT
LU
O.
•S
§
er
U.
3
LU
Ll_
U*»
o
LU
Q£
LU
O
LU
cc
H- '
UU
1 1 1
UU
0.
•
"W
1
<
LU
_l
CO
H"









u.
s
o
w

^
w
<

J*
^te
U
c
o>
Q. Q.
S >v
C^ CO P^* CO
^H
u
III CM
<— 1
co o to «r
CT* P*^ CTi rO


III Z

co P^. co «-^
^«4 ««4
§r^ o *O
f*^ O^ C^*
^H
'.'I CO

III ~H
iti z:

111 LO

— i CM ro -^
>>
s- -u
0) 5- —
fO 4_J fQ
S- ro 3
i— 3 Cr










• •
a> a>
^_1 ^_)
*^ ^*
i i
O) OJ
u u
C C
^ ft)
i- S-
A> V
4> fl)
S- J- •
•o -a ai
a> a> in
••- -f- >,
^» ^» ^^
^j ^J ^*
^* ^^ &»
• a; a;
A> U O O>
-O CM ~H ro
it} < < O.
> 2= C_5 3

«C (/•> i-o S
A-7

-------
LU

i
  LU
 LU
 OS
 LU
           ft

          1
_

i
LU


§
LU =
ZED
LU
O Z
o: u
LU <
a. LU
LO
CD
    u
    4->

 ^5  CO

<


 0)

'o. CL
                           c-. r-j co ir> vo    «a-
                           vo o CD —< -H    -H
                            i  i   i   i
                           CM CO CM CM ^    ^-i
                           Of 9> O CM O    O
                         I   I   I   I  I  I    CM
                        I   I   I   I   I   I
                          »-« cy> -H o CM    —<
                          r^ o o CM m    o%
                     oo
                     c?>
                                CM «a- in    vo
                                o o o    CM
                        i   i   i   i   i  i    en
                        i   i   i   i
                                           CO
                                           CO
                    CM CM —' <—l •—l «-H    —<
                      I   I   I   I  I  I      I
                    oo to to oo u^ i>o    c/o
                    to to co to co m    to
                    <:<<:<:<:<     PO    —i
                       S-
                       ai
                       o
                                           S- -f-
                                           0) r—
                                            «3
                                                       0)

                                                       J3
                                                       (O
 o
z

 II
                                         A-8

-------
TABLE A-6.  METHOD DETECTION LIMITS FOR ANALYSIS OF ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
            FROM 100-L SAMPLES DURING THE PLUME-TRACKING EXERCISES.
            SEPTEMBER 1987
Analyte
Cl2(8)a
C13U8)
Cl3(28)
Heptachlor
C14(52)
Aldrin
C14(44)
Cl4(66)
o,p'-DDE
Cl5(101)
Chlordane
Dieldrin
p.p'-DDE
. C14(74)
o,p'-DDD
C15(118)
p,p'-DDD
o.p'-DDT
Cl6(153)
Cl5(105)
p.p'.-DDT
Cl6(138)
C15U26)
Cl7(187)
C16U28)
Cl7(180)
Cl7(170)
Cl8(195)
Clg(206)
a-Endosulfan
Endosulfan sulfate
Detection Limit (ng/L)
0.004
0.001
0.003
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.002
0.003
0.001
0.002
0.002
0.001
0.002
0.013
0.008
0.002
0.004
0.003
0.002
0.007
0.001
0.003
0.010
0.005
0.007
0.000
0.001
0.001
0.000
Not determined
Not determined
             	  refer to  PCB  level  of  chlorination.  The  number

             refers  to the  isomer  number,  IUPAC  nomenclature.
                               .A-Q

-------
    TABLE A-7. RECOVERY OF DECACHLOROBIPHENYL SPIKED INTO 100-L
               SAMPLES OF SEAWATER PRIOR TO EXTRACTION IN THE FIELD
Plume
or
Event
S8
S8
DB-2
DB-2
DB-2
DB-2
DB-2
DB-2
DB-2
DB-2
DB-2
DB-2
DB-2
DB-2
DB-3
DB-3
DB-3
DB-3
DB-3
DB-3
DB-3
DB-3
Depth
(•)
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
24.5
24.5
24.5
6.0
6.0
6.0
10.1
10.5
10.3
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
7.0
5-7
••^•I^^KKEB
Rep.
No.
1
2
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
,3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
Start
Time
2051
2057
0722
0730
0738
2133
2212
2236
1456
1505
1510
1822
1833
1847
0900
0911
0918
1535
1543
1551
1613
1644
Tine
After
T-0 (h)
BKG
BKG
BKG
BKG
BKG
BKG
BKG
BKG
4.5
4.6
4.7
7.9
8.1
8.3
BKG
BKG
BKG
4.4
4.5
4.7
5.0
5.6

Not
Not
37.6
30.6
33.2
36.0
15.3
25.6
57.9
11.8
11.3
6.4
7.6
22.4
28.7
30.5
30.8
23.5
27.0
15.2
Percent
Recovery
available
available


















33.73
23.3

     of two replicate analyses.
BKG denotes background samples.
                                    A-10

-------
      TABLE A-8.  RESULTS OF BLANK SPIKE ANALYSIS,  ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
        Compound
Percent
Recovery
Pesticides
PCBs
        Heptachlor
        Aldrin
        Heptachlor epoxide
        cc-Endosulfan
        Dieldn'n
        4,4'-DDE
        Endrin
        /?-Endosu1fan
        4,4'-DDD .
        Endrin aldehyde
        Endosulfan sulfate
        4,4'-DDT
        Methoxychlor
        Cl2(8)
        Cl3(18)
        Cl3(28)
        C14(52)
        Cl4(44)
        Cl4(66)
        cisdoi)
        Cl5(118)
        Cl6(153)
        C15(105)
        Cl6(138)
        C17(187)
        Cl6(128)
        C17(170)
        Cl8(195)
        Clg(206)
  110
  111

    8.6

  120
  114
    9.6
   91.8
   96.4
  117
   96.7
  105
  102
  92.7
  144
  110
  162
  145
  105
  101
  102
  101
  96.2
  89.3
                                     A-11

-------

-------
                APPENDIX B



     CTD  TRANSECT TO THE  106-MILE SITE



WATER MASSES DURING PLUME-TRACKING SURVEYS

-------

-------
                      CTD Transect to the 106-Mile Site

     During the eastbound transit to the 106-Mile Site on August 31, 1987, a
series of seven CTD profiles was made along a line extending from the edge of
the continental shelf, through the northern end of the 106-Mile Site, to a
position roughly 8 miles northeast of the site (Figure B-l).  The primary.
objective of this transect was to locate the position of the shelf water/
slope water front (east of the 106-Mile Site), as well as to determine
whether a warm-core Gulf Stream eddy was situated near the eastern boundary
of the site, as suspected from interpretations of satellite thermal imagery.
     To illustrate variations in water properties along the eastbound CTD
transect, Figure B-2 presents vertical profiles of temperature (top panel)
and salinity (middle panel)  versus depth for Stations 1,  4, and 5 along the
transect.  Stations 1 and 5 are located at the edge of the continental shelf
and within the 106-Mile Site, respectively;  Station 4 is  shown for comparison
because it exhibited anomalous water mass properties.
     The upper panel of Figure B-2 illustrates that the surface mixed layer
at the offshore stations was more than 1°C warmer than surface waters at
Station 1, and that the mixed layer deepened toward shore.  Profiles of all
stations revealed a sharp,  seasonal thermocline beneath the shallow, surface
mixed layer.  Although temperatures were relatively constant (between 11 and
14°C) over the depth range between 50 and 150 m,  large variations were
observed between 25 and 50 m. The most extreme temperature variation was at  .
Station 4, where an isothermal layer of 8°C-water was observed between 30 and
40 m.
     The middle panel of Figure B-2 illustrates that salinities at Station 4
were also relatively low within this isothermal layer (between 30 and 40 m).
This specific water type (8°C, 33.2 ppt) is normally associated with a well-
known east coast hydrographic feature named the "cold pool."  This water mass
obtains its properties during late winter when the mixed  layer at the edge of
the continental shelf is relatively cool and fresh.  As the surface waters
warm during spring and summer, the lower portion of this  water mass (the
prior winter's mixed-layer)  becomes isolated from the surface, and its
properties remain uncianged for many months.
                                     B-l

-------
          39 10'N
          39' O'N
          2* 30'N
            73  3' H
                            n 43- x
                                             29' M
                                                          78' 3- H
FIGURE B-l.
LOCATIONS  OF CTD PROFILE STATIONS OCCUPIED ALONG THE EASTBOUND
TRANSECT TO  THE 106-MILE SITE ON AUGUST  31,  1987.
                                        B-2

-------
     The cold, fresh layer of "cold pool" water observed at Station 4 appears
to be a small, isolated water parcel because water properties at the
surrounding stations were distinctly different.  This isolated parcel of
water may have been attached to a larger parcel extending north or south of
the transect.  This theory, however, could not be confirmed by the existing
station data.
     The lower panel of Figure B-2 presents a composite of temperature/
salinity (T/S) diagrams from Stations 1, 4, and 5.  The highest temperature
of each profile represents the surface properties at each station.  This
figure illustrates that the near-surface waters (>15°C) at Station 1 were
significantly fresher than offshore surface waters or, in other words, near-
surface waters at Station 1 were representative of shelf water whereas slope
water was observed at the offshore stations.  Note, however, that the layer
of shelf water at Station 1 penetrated to only 25 m and that relatively
saline slope water was found below this depth.  Shelf water was observed
within the upper 18 m of the water column at Station 2 but none was found
farther offshore.  From this analysis, it appears that the offshore (surface)
boundary of the shelf water was situated approximately 25 nm west of the 106-
Mile Site on August 31, 1987.
     The T/S diagrams presented in Figure B-2 also illustrate the extremely
cold, fresh characteristics of the "cold pool" water (8°C, 33.2 ppt) at
Station 4.  Beneath this anomalous layer, slope water characteristics are
observed at all three transect stations  (1, 4, and 5).
     Figure B-3 presents vertical profiles of density (sigma-t), light
transmission  (beam attenuation), and dissolved oxygen for the three stations
presented in  Figure B-2.  Despite the large variability in T/S structure at
the three stations, vertical profiles of sigma-t (top panel) are relatively
similar showing strong vertical density  gradients of the seasonal pycnocline
extending from the base of the shallow,  surface mixed layer to depths of
roughly 40 m. ' Below this depth, weak vertical gradients are similar at all
stations.
     The middle panel of Figure B-3 presents vertical gradients of
transmissometry data, presented in  terms of the beam attenuation coefficient,
for  Stations  1, 4, and 5.  Beam attenuation is linearly proportional to total
suspended solids or turbidity.  The Sea  Tech transmissometer interfaced to
                                      B-4

-------
                                 50
                              3 100-
                              x
                                ISO-
                                200-
                                               10
  TEMPERATUF1E  (C5
        15
                             i 100-
                             5
                             a.
                               150-
                               200
                               20-
                             UJ
                             !-
                             UJ
                               10-
                                             33
SALINITY (PPT)
     34
                                                                     35
                                                                                    25
                                                                                 33
FIGURE B-2.

                                                    (MIDDLE);
                                                                                          4
                                                B-3

-------
                                                SIGMA-
FIGURE  B-3.
                          50-
                        £ 100
                        I
                        h-
                        a.
                        8
                          150
                          200
                           . 0.0
                            0-
                           50-
                         1 100'
                           150-
                           200
                           50-
                         £ 100-
                         x
                         H-
                         a
                         5

                           150-
                           200
                                           BEAM ATTENUATION  tl/«)
                                     0.2       0.4       0.6       O.S
                                              OXYGEN (1*1/1)
                                           4              6
                                              4\_VI
                                                      i.o
COMPOSITE OF  HYDROGRAPHIC PROFILE  RESULTS  FROM STATIONS 1,  4
AND  5:  SIGMA-T PROFILES  (UPPER); BEAM ATTENUATION  PROFILES
(MIDDLE); OXYGEN PROFILES (LOWER).
                                            B-5

-------
 the CTD  profiling  system measured  the  percent  extinction  of light  along  a 25-
 cm pathlength,  but light extinction  (L)  is  exponentially  related to  total
 suspended solids and  is,  therefore, misleading for quantitative
 interpretations of sludge concentrations.   The relationship between  the  beam
 attenuation coefficient  (A) and measured light extinction  (L) is given by the
 expression:
                             L « e-0.25A
                                 or
                             A = -4 In L

 where L ranges from 0 to 1.0,  0.25 represents the pathlength in meters, and
 A is expressed in units of meters-1 (m-1).
      The vertical profiles of  beam attenuation shown  in Figure B-3 exhibit
 consistent  values within the surface  mixed  layer and  below 50 m but,  within
 the  seasonal  pycnocline,  a great  deal  of  variability  was  observed among the
 three transect stations.   Between  20  and  50  m,  beam attenuation was
 significantly greater than values  above and  below the pycnocline,  and  at  the
 offshore  stations (4  and  5), a  very thin  (<10  m)  layer of relatively high-
 beam attenuation  was  highly pronounced.   These  high values  were associated
 with  the  base of  the  seasonal pycnocline  and,  at  Station  4,  the highest
 values were observed  at the upper  boundary of  the  "cold pool" water.
      Relatively high  values  of beam attenuation  in the  seasonal  pycnocline
 off  the U.S.  east  coast have been  observed by other investigators.  As part
 of the Shelf  Edge  Exchange  Program  (SEEP), Churchill  et al.  (1988) reported
 similar values along  a cross-slope  transect south of  New  England.  The
 relatively high beam  attenuation values were attributed to natural
 particulate matter, but additional  sampling and laboratory analyses are
 required to ascertain the composition of this material.  From the work of
Churchill et  al.  (1988), it can be  determined that beam attenuation values of
0.7 m-1 correspond to suspended particulate concentrations on the order of
0.5 mg/L.  These concentrations are low compared to suspended loads in
coastal and shelf waters, but in a water column composed of relatively  clear
s'ope *3ter, elevated concentrations of participates  are an excellent

                                     B-6

-------
indication of physical and biological processes governing the vertical
transport of particulate material.
     Vertical profiles of dissolved oxygen concentration at Stations 1 and 4
are presented in the lower panel of Figure B-3.  These profiles illustrate
that mixed-layer oxygen concentrations are on the order of 4.5 ml/1, but
within the seasonal pycnocline  (at 20 to 25 m) oxygen concentrations exceed
6 ml/1.  These oxygen concentrations represent approximately 110 percent
saturation which is maintained by high biological productivity within the
pycnocline.  Below this near-surface oxygen maximum, concentrations at
Station 1 decrease nearly monotonically to 150 m.  In contrast, oxygen
concentrations below the pycnocline at Station 4 exhibit large inversions due
to lateral interleaving of water masses.  Note, for example, that the oxygen
minimum near 35 m coincides with the cold, fresh water of the "cold pool"
water mass discussed above.'  Relatively low oxygen concentrations within the
"cold pool" are consistent with the hypothesis that this water parcel*has
"aged" since contact with the sea surface during the prior winter, and that
biological consumption has significantly reduced its dissolved oxygen
concentration.
     It is important to point out that dissolved oxygen concentrations within
and below the seasonal pycnocline at the 106-Mile Site (in summer) are highly
variable due to natural biological processes and water mass advection.
Horizontal variations within the mixed layer may be small, but variations of
0.5 ml/I over horizontal distances of a few kilometers may be expected
beneath the pycnocline.  This background variability must be better
understood if estimates are to be made of the depletion of oxygen due to the
discharge of sludge at the 106-Mile Site.
     To illustrate the vertical and horizontal variations in hydrographic
properties along the eastbound CTD transect, Figure B-4 presents vertical
sections of temperature (top), salinity (middle), and sigma-t (bottom) along
a line connecting Stations 1 through 6 (see Figure B-l for positions).  These
two-dimensional diagrams have been objectively contoured using a spline
function for vertical and horizontal smoothing.  Consequently, some of the
most extreme (and thin) property anomalies have been smoothed out, but the
general characteristics of each property field are well represented.
                                     B-7

-------
      The temperature section presented in Figure B-3 illustrates the sharp
 seasonal thermocline situated between approximately 15 and 30 m.  Vertical
 temperature gradients vary somewhat across the transects, but the near-
 surface thermocline is relatively horizontal across the entire transect.  The
 only major temperature feature that is evident beneath the thermocline is the
 parcel  of "cold pool" water situated at 35 m beneath Stations 4 and 5.  This
 coincides with the low-salinity feature observed in the salinity section
 (middle panel) of Figure B-4.  In general,  salinities increase with depth
 over the upper 150 m of the water column  in  this region.   The increase in
 near-surface salinities from Station 1 to Station 3 represents the  boundary
 between shelf and slope waters  along the  transect.
      The lower panel  of Figure  B-4 presents  the  two-dimensional  density
 (sigma-t)  field along  the eastbound CTD transect.   Sharp  vertical density
 gradients  between 15  and 35 m correspond  with  the seasonal pycnocline;
 vertical  gradients  below this level  are much weaker.    The density  transect
 reveals  a  relatively consistent  pycnocline across the entire  transect  from
 Station  1  to  Station 6.   Only a  gradual rise in  the pycnocline depth can  be
 detected  from Station  1  to  Station  5.   If there  were no currents in the  lower
 part of  the water column, then the  offshore rise of the pycnocline would  be
 indicative of a  southward current within  the near-surface layers across the
 transect, but  additional, wide-area current information would be required to
 resolve  this  current structure.  Likewise, deepening of the pycnocline from
 Station  5 to  Station 6 may  represent northward near-surface flow, but a
 longer transect would be required to support this assumption.  Both the
 temperature and density fields do, however, clearly illustrate that a warm-
 core Gulf Stream  eddy did not occupy the northern portion of the 106-Mile
 Site on August 31, 1987.  Had an eddy been present, isotherms and isopycnals
would have sloped sharply downward due to the relatively warm and less-dense
waters contained within warm-core eddies.
     Figure B-5 presents vertical sections of beam attenuation and  dissolved
oxygen similar to those presented in Figure B-4.   The upper panel  clearly
 illustrates that beam attenuation (natural turbidity)  is highest within the
seasonal pycnocline (20 to 40 m).  Maximum values are observed at Stations 4
and 5, in association with the "cold pool" as discussed previously.
                                     B-8

-------
                           TEMPERATURE   (C)
                           2.	.3        >      	5
             1 SO
              72°S6'W
                                   Uongltud*
71 e 56'W
               o .•
            1 SO
             72«36'W
                              SALINITY  (PPT)
                                   Longitud*
71 ° S6'W
            1 SO
             72°S6'W
                                                            7 1 e SS'W
E B-4.    VERTICAL  TRANSECT OF HYDROGRAPHIC  PROPERTIES  ALONG  EASTBOUND
         CTD  TRANSEa  (SEE FIGURE 4.1  FOR STATION  LOCATIONS):
         TEMPERATURE  (UPPER);  SALINITY (MIDDLE); SI6MA-T  (LOWER).

                                    B-9

-------
             Jj   50
             •





             "a- 100
                1 50
                        BEAM   ATTENUATION   (1/m)

                     Jl         J2	3	>          5        6
                 72°56'W
                                         Long!tuci<
                                                      71°5S'W
            J- 100
               1 SO
                72°56'W
                               OXYGEN   (ml/l)
                                         .3
                                                                        SS'W
FIGURE B-5.
        c         °F "YDROSRAPHIC PROPERTIES ALONG EASTBOUND

CTD TRANSECT: BEAM ATTENUATION (UPPER); OXYGEN (LOWER).
                                      B-10

-------
     The lower panel  of Figure B-5 .presents oxygen data for Stations 1
through 4 and Station 6 (oxygen data are not available from Station 5 due to

a problem with the pump which delivers water to the oxygen sensor of the Sea

Bird CTD system).   The highest oxygen concentrations (>6 ml/1)  are found
within a thin layer that coincides with the seasonal pycnocline.  Horizontal

gradients are rather weak, as observed for the other water properties.
     To summarize, the hydrographic data collected along the eastbound CTD
transect to the 106-Mile Site revealed the following background conditions:


     •  All hydrographic observations were typical for summer
        conditions at the 106-Mile Site, as deduced by comparison
        with past studies along the U.S. East Coast.

     •  A sharp seasonal pycnocline was situated between roughly
        20 and 40 m along the entire transect that included the
        northern portion of the 106-Mile Site.

     •  The upper 150 m of the water column at the 106-Mile Site
        was composed of slope water; only a thin (20 m) layer of
        shelf water was observed east  (inshore) of 72°40'W
        longitude, a distance of 25 nm west of the 106-Mile Site.

     •  Temperature/salinity and oxygen analyses indicated
        extensive lateral (isopycnal) mixing of water masses
        within and below the seasonal pycnocline.

     •  Natural turbidity levels were highest within the seasonal
        pycnocline.

     •  The water column  structure  and properties in the vicinity
        of the 106-Mile Site  indicate  that a warm-core Gulf Stream
        eddy was  not present,  at  least during the first day of the
        survey (August 31,  1987).
                  Water  Masses  During  Plume-Tracking Surveys



      Because  the  primary  objective  of the hydrographic profiling made during

 the individual  plume tracking  surveys was to acquire data within the sludge

 plumes,  few hydrographic  profiles were made in  "clean" background water.   It

 is, however,  informative  to look  at data from a few stations  during each  of

 the three days  of survey  operations for the purpose of illustrating the •

 var-.aDility in  background properties'of temperature, salinity,  density, and

                                      B-ll

-------
  dissolved  oxygen.   Figure B-6 presents  a composite  of four density (sigma-t)

  profiles,  each  obtained  during one  of the four plume  tracking  surveys  (DB-1,

  DB-2,  DB-3,  and DB-4).   The  individual  profiles were  separated  by  roughly 20
  h as  indicated  below:
       Survey

        DB-1 '
        DB-2
        DB-3
        DB-4
CTD
Profile
1-5
2-1
3-6
4-2
Profile
Depth (m)
59
67
55
56
                             Date

                            9-1-87
                            9-2-87
                            9-3-87
                            9-4-87
              Time

              1710
              1556
              1140
              0639
      Figure B-6 illustrates that the depth (thickness)  of the surface mixed
 layer remained very constant (between 11 and 14 m)  over the four days of

 surveying.   The shape of the seasonal pycnocline varied somewhat but, in

 general,  strong vertical  density gradients were evident between  15 and 35  m.

 It  will be  shown in Section 4.3.3 that initial  mixing within  the sludge
 plumes penetrated  to the  base  of the  mixed layer, but the sludge was

 apparently  less  dense  than  the waters of the  seasonal pycnocline and,

 consequently,  plume waters  were  not observed  below  approximately 20 m.

     Figure B-7  presents  a  composite  of  temperature/salinity  (T/S) profiles
 from each of the four  plume  surveys.   These profiles demonstrate  that  near-
 surface T/S properties varied greatly  during  individual  plume surveys, as
well as from survey  to survey (day to  day).  Profile depths and times are
given below:
      Survey

       DB-1
       DB-1

       DB-2
       DB-2

       DB-3
       DB-3

       DB-4
CTD
Profile
1-2
1-6
2-1
2-3
3-1
3-6
Profile
Depth (m)
45
26
67
67
67
55
4-2
                                  56
 Date

9-1-87
9-1-87

9-2-87
9-2-87

9-3-87
9-3-87

9-4-87
Time

1407
1732

1556
2054

0816
1140

0639
                                    B-12

-------
                                                                                         UJ
                                                                                         i
                                                                                          z
                                                                                          UJ
                                                                                          
 UJ
i 3C

i _j
> CL.
i
; Q£

io
                                                                                           CO
                                                                   M.U30
                                      B-13

-------
                                               I
                                               > '
                                               tv t
                                               z

                                               I
                                                       I
                                                      CD
                                                      O
                                                            (3)
                                           _) LU



                                           LU ^^
                                           0£
                                           =1 Of


                                           ii
                                           LU
                                           O- LU
I

> •
»» <

X


i
X

3
                                                     fO

                                                      I

                                                     03

                                                     O
                                                                                        LLJO
                                          >. H- <_»

                                          •gs

                                           LU CJJ
                                           OO Z
                                           LU •—i
                                           Of Of
                                           O- 3
                                             to
                                                                                        i
                                                                                       CO
                                                         13)
                                     B-14

-------
During the first plume survey (DB-1),  seven of nine total CTD profiles
exhibited nearly isohaline (constant salinity) properties from the surface to
approximately 40 m (a temperature range from 22 to 10°C).  These
characteristics are represented by profile 1-6.  Profile 1-2, which was made
a few hours earlier and 4 miles to the south of profile 1-6, had near-surface
salinities that were more than 1 ppt greater than shown by the other
profiles.  These high salinities indicate that waters of Gulf Stream origin
resided within the 106-Mile Site on September 1,  1987, most likely as a
result of water that had been advected into the region during the earlier
passage of warm-core eddy "87-E,"  (Note that the two profiles shown for
survey DB-1 did not extend as deep as those shown for other surveys in Figure
B-8.)
     The near-surface T/S profiles obtained during plume survey DB-2
exhibited a similar trend of normal slope water (nearly isohaline from 22 to
8°C) interrupted by subsurface layers of relatively saline Gulf S-tream waters
within the temperature range from 9 to 17°C.  The upper right panel of Figure
B-8 illustrates a typical slope water T/S profile (2-1) and a profile with
highly saline waters from 17 to 9°C (2-3).  The T/S properties at the surface
and at depths greater than 40 m were,  however, the same at both stations.
The L-shaped T/S profile of cast 2-1,  having temperature and salinity minima
near 8°C, is typical of slope water characteristics during summer.
     The T/S characteristics during plume surveys DB-3 and DB-4 (lower panels
of Figure B-7) indicate that, within the upper 60 m of the water column,
slope waters had been displaced by relatively saline waters of Gulf Stream
origin.  For survey DB-3, all 16 CTD profiles had T/S properties that were
bracketed by the properties of the two profiles shown (3-1 and 3-6).  The
temperature and salinity minima of the slope water were clearly absent, and
the highest salinities were observed near 16°C, similar to profile 2-3 made
during survey DB-2.  Only one CTD profile (No. 4-2) to a depth of 50 m was
obtained during survey DB-4, but it also had T/S characteristics similar to
those  of survey DB-3.
     These  T/S results illustrate that, during the 4-day period from
September  1 through 4, 1987, near-surface waters of Gulf Stream origin
entered  the northern portion of  the 106-Mile Site, probably as a result of .
                                     B-15

-------
 warm-core eddy "87-E" that was situated southeast of the site and presumably
 moving toward the southwest.
      Although the T/S properties of the upper 50 m of the water column at the
 106-Mile Site varied greatly during the 4-day survey,  temporal  variations in
 the dissolved oxygen profile were small,  as had been observed for density
 (sigma-t)  profiles shown  in Figure B-6.   For example,  Figure B-8 presents
 vertical  profiles of oxygen and  percent  oxygen  saturation for profile  1-1 of
 survey DB-1  and  for profile 3-6  of survey DB-3.   Small  variations  can  be
 observed  in  the  thickness  of the subsurface oxygen maximum (near 20 m
 depth), but  oxygen  concentrations  above and below this  level  were  very
 similar.  Oxygen  characteristics of the other 28  CJD profiles made during the
 four-day survey were  very  similar  to those  shown  in  Figure B-8.
     Profiles of  percent oxygen  saturation,  calculated  from  the  equation  of
 Weiss  (1970), are shown in  the two  right panels of Figure B-8.   For these  and
 other profiles, surface oxygen concentrations were roughly 90 percent
 saturated, whereas, at the  depth of  the subsurface oxygen maximum, saturation
 values exceeded 110 percent.  This  is a common feature within the seasonal
 pycnocline of the slope water and the entire northwestern Atlantic during
 summer.  The high oxygen concentrations are simply a result of exceptionally
high photosynthetic productivity within the nutrient-rich seasonal
pycnocline.
                                    B-16

-------
 3
 15
  s-
s
iS
                                               Is
I
                                            to
                                                                                             o
                                                                                           Sao
                                                                                           00
                                                                                           UJ(/>
                                                                                             UJ
I
3
1
                                                                                             cV
                                                                                           «_»: 3,-
                                            oo
                                            CO
                                            UJ
                                            o:
                                   B-17

-------

-------

-------
  APPENDIX C



BACKGROUND DATA
                                            III: '

-------
UJ

UJ

o
£
   UJ
LU an
of LU
O LU

P O.
< LU
LU LU
LU Of
CD 3
h- O
CO O£
  -CD

a ce
— o
oo o
    LU
O I—
UJ CJ
O LU
Z —I
LU —I
a. o
    UJ
                       i
                       o
                    4)
             S -M
                                      •-* o o
                                   <: — o o
                                   3E  •  *   •
                                      000
                                      CO Csj ro
                                     ' ^3 ^O ^^
                                     '  *   •   •
                                      o o o
                                                            uDror«»i— ivoco
                                                            OOCMCMCM-^
                       OOOOOO



                       co r-> en o co CM


                       o o o o o o
                            <£  <:
    CO CO
 CM 01 r^
: r-» o O
   *   *   •
 CM O O
                                      CO —«
                                        i CM
                                                            OOOOOO
O O O -* VO O


OOOOOO




o o o m co pn


O O O O O O









o o d o as o
                                   z             	
                                      •—" CM CM              —i —« .« ro PO «»•             •—i •—i  -^ CM (•••> CM






                       ^

                       _                                                                                    o
                       p





                             ro«a-po-*.-^.-«CMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCM
                 3Wa>    aacococococa      111111111     111111111
                 ^- o >     i  i   i   i   i   i     cpcacacacQcocQcpra    cocococQCQCQcncQca
                 CU    LU    OO OO OO i
                                                     C-l

-------
        TABLE C-2.  BACKGROUND WATER QUALITY C.oerfrinoens
                   ANALYSES,  106-MILE SITE,  SE
             m                        Time
             Plume
Sample
ID
"• i in
AAD855
AAD855
AAD855
AAD856
AAD856
AAD856
AAD857
AAD857
AAD857
AAD859
AAD859
AAD859
AAD874
AAD874
AAD874
AAD879
AAD879
AAD879
AAD883
AAD883
AAD883
AAD884
AAD884
AAD884
AAD916
AAD916
AAD916
AAD917
AAD917
AAD917
AAD918
AA0918
AAD918
«i LCI
or Rep. Depth Start T=0
Event No. (m) Time (h)
"^ — — —
S-8
S-8
S-8
S-8
S-8
S-8
DB-1
DB-1
DB-1
DB-1
DB-1
DB-1
DB-2
DB-2
DB-2
DB-2
DB-2
DB-2
DB-2
DB-2
DB-2
DB-3
DB-3
DB-3
DB-4
DB-4
DB-4
DB-4
DB-4
DB-4
DB-4
DB-4
DB-4
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
6.0
6.0
6.0
41.0
41.0
41.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
33.0
33.0
33.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
20.4
20.4
20.4
24.0
24.0
24.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
19.1
19.1
19.1
2119
2119
2119
2048
2048
2048
0758
0758
0758
0826
0826
0826
0752
0752
0752
2108
2108,
2108
2118
2118
2118
0839
0839
0839
0640
0640
0640
0650
0650
0650
0701
0701
0701
NA
NA
NA
i in
NA
NA
NA
-8.83
-8.83
-8.83
-8.37
-8.37
-8.37
-2.58
-2.58
-2.58
a
a

-2.53
-2.53
-2.53
h
kJ
h
LJ
h
LJ
b
b
b
b
LJ
b
b
                                              C.  perfrinoens
                                              (Counts/100  mL)
                                                   0.00
                                                   0,
                                                   0,
                                                   0.
   00
   00
   00
                                                   0.00
                                                   0,
                                                   0.
                                                   0.
   00
   00
   00
                                                   0.00'
                                                   0,
                                                   0,
   00
   00
                                                  	0.00

                                                  17.94
                                                  29.31
                                                  82.94
                                                   1.31
                                                  5.13
                                                  9.31
                                                  4.81
                                                   .44
                                                   .63
1,
5.
1.44
1.38
1.06
                                                  0.00
                                                  0.00
                                                  0.00
                                                  0,
                                                  0,
  06
  13
                                                 0.06
                                                 0.00
                                                 0.13
                                                 0.00
JIntitial Sampling For Plume DB-2
Dinit^al Sampling For Plumes DB-3 and DB-4.
                          C-3

-------
o>
 o
CJ
so
•s.
         19  3
         D  e
        CQ  CO
               fl-

               z
                C  4>
          4)  4> O
          a •*->  ii
                &.
                IB
                en
                4)
                a.  •
                v  o
                cc. z
                 ex s

                a
 5  4-  4>
^-  0  >
O.     LU
                            «*<:<:
                                        ,_ ^ —i  ,—i ^ ^.ICMCMCM
                                        OOOOOOOOO
                                        OOOOOOOOO

                                        ooooooooo
                           ^•^^*T^^^^^

                           ooooooooo



                                     r». P»» f«« CO CO CO

                           ooooooooo

                           ooooooooo
                                        ooooooooo
                                         •a -o -a
                            i—i —• CM

                            o o o
                            ooooooooo
                            LD
                     IT)
               CM CM CM
                I   I   I

               ^y\ c^ C^

               CO CO CO
               o o o
               «r «a- «s-
               CO CO CO
               CO CO CO
               o o o
                                CM
                             o o o
                                         to vo vo vO vo ^O r*^ P^ r>^
                                         ooooooooo
                                         ooaoooooo
ro <*o ro
  >   i   i
za CD co
.0 o o
 i   i   i  i   i   i   i   i   i
CQ co CQ co co co co co CD
QQOOOQQOQ
                                                                                      0)
                                               V
                                               •*->        c
                                               o        o
                                               a>       •»-

                                               CO     l/>  t.
                                               S_     CO  O
                                                     4->  ex
                                               <9     (Q  O
                                               4->     US-
                                               iC    **^  Ok


                                               '^  g- =
                                               =" a>  s-

                                               •^ tj  OJ -—

                                               *O -F-J CO •*"
                                               c  co jz  v>
                                               (O  t-  •«-» •*•
                                               r—        >•
                                               ex «3  t-
                                               X +•»  O  ul
                                               CO  ra "*—  CO
                                                                            i.  o  a>

                                                                                   O)
                                                '

                                                  +J CO
                                                 - C -C
                                                4->  O
                                                t—  ^j CO
                                                en    •—
                                                •--  CO Q.

                                                S  U f9
                                                  •f- Irt
                                                CO  •(->
                                                S-  4- T3
                                                03  ^ ^^
                                                -•->  ex c
                                            s-   •
                                            CO i/>
                                               CO

                                            "~'&
                                            ^1
                                            c <^
                                            o
                                               CO

                                            fO CO
                                                                         CO
                                                                         4-1  i-
                                                                         ea  o
                                                                                          a>
                                                                                       O  3
-o  c  
 03  c: x
 > -^ co
                                                                               -a  o
                                                                                       o i-o
                                                                                       C— t/1)
                                                                                      
-------






i
Q£
LU
Q.
LU
CO
»
LU
h~*
CO
LU
10
o

CO
LU
CO
^jj
z
CO
LU
£•
**<
_J
O*
o:
LU
<
*
z
i
e?
o
«c
03

*
ro
I
0
tu


*2*






o>
=

NJ

.0
V
CO

£


^^
z

ro



2

«J
5-


fO
2

-0
«c

«s


1
a
V
ce.
i.
^ ^^ ^^
^"^ t__
^™ iT? ^™

0)
E~ C
'O 2J
wO C

^.^
_J
O)
C













^>
o>















*
. o
•as.



••^
*"** "


-~.
•— '

CM
O»
•

«3- «S"
PO PO
o o
o o
CO CO
0 0
??

O T
CM CM
O O
0 0
in t-i
vo m
CM CM
0 0
VO CM
«r o
CM CM
o o

vo ~H
"7 '"t
o o
CO CM
^r PO
cs o
PO PO
i—4 i-H
o o
o o
CM in
O C7>
—* o
CM PO
0 O
o o
1
C CM PO
o
0

•f  «-4 
O PO P^

r*. CO 10
CM O CM
CM in o
O O — i
CM *T «3-
«3- CM CO
•— I CM CM
ooo
«r CM PO
•— i CM PO
ooo
ooo
CO «*•  o o

>O PO
O «— i
ooo
* •
o o

•— 4 CM PO


CO CO CO
in in in
• * •
CM CM CM
1 1 1



o o o
^o **o *o

0>«3-
^ CO CO
co m CM
o ao «a-
CM "< ^H
ooo
PO PO PO
000
?o o
V V

Lf) CM CM
«— 4 t— 1 I— 1
ooo
ooo
co o> in
CM PO «3-
CM CM CM
ooo
cr> p** «-H
r-* CM o
un r^. r-.
ooo

O O Cft
in o in
~H f-4 CM
O O CS
co co in
O CM CM
ooo
in PO o
i-H i-H I— 4
ooo
ooo
&\ co un
cr* cr^ CT^
000
PO O
O CM
ooo
o o

r-4 CM PO


PO PO PO
in m in
CM CM CM
1 1 1



ooo
vc^vo"


























.
c
13
-Q
i — PO
fC 1
i. CO
• 3 Q
e -o
O QJ "O
•i- O C
4-1 O fO
S- CXCM
Q^ I
C C CO
4>  s-
* 4^ O

^W vl *4—
jQ • t- O> en
 >, -i—
i — o o 'a.
Q. 4) >vr- E
Q. S- JD -t-J fO
fO L- fV3 (Si
O T3 S_
-*-> o o •*-> »^
O isl C rC
Z -* >^ O) • —
C i — U *->
. — c o c
— '
21 fl3 J2 O "O
C-4

-------
  UJ
   UJ
  ' VO
  > o
   UJ
s?
UJ  I
t§
co a.
O UJ
Z 19

  -S

£"
So
CO U.
=3 O
h- UJ

urS^:
O —i eo
>—i —i o
o uj uj
111   i gp
Q Q. Z

UJ < H-
Ck. bO O.
CO   LU
3 UJ 10

   UJ C3
—i oe z
•< o >—
1— (^) OS

I— O O
  I
 o
 aa
               CO C
                     I/I
                  I
                   Sc?
                ^_ 4jC3-~.

                P < H-^5.




                     •4-1
                     U «

                      V O
                     ae. z
                      a. B
                   1,
                   s°
                               oo<:oocooo
                                    z ,_ ^ ^H ro ro
                                      O O O OO

                                      OO OO O
                               CM C\J   O O O O O
                                      CM CM CNJ P^ r^

                                      O O O O O
                               CM CM   I-N. r*. !•«» lf> IT)
                               «^     •—

                          .O fO  £ t4~
                           3  -M a>
                          *-  TS <9
                          o o  a> s-
                          3E    r— 1O
                             c  a. a>
                          ii 
-------
TABLE C-5.  BACKGROUND HATER QUALITY PESTICIDE ANALYSES,
            106-MILE SITE, SEPTEMBER 1987
Event
S8
S8
DB-2
DB-2
DB-2
DB-2
DB-2
DB-2
DB-3
DB-3
DB-3
Depth
(•)
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
24.5
24.5
24.5
6.0
6.0-
6.0
Rep.
No.
1
2
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
Time
After
T=0
BKG
BKG
BKG
BKG
BKG
BKG
BKG
BKG
BKG
BKG
BKG
a-BHC
0.068
-
1.10
1.05
1.24
1.15
0.26
0.16
3.41
9.41
2.20
7-BHC
0.046 .
-
0.65
0.47
0.72
0.99
0.46
0.31
1.74
2.52
1.22
BKG denotes background samples.

Compounds not found:  heptachlor,  aldn'n,  heptachlor epoxide,
  cc-endosulfan,  dieldrin, p,p'-DDE,  endrin aldehyde,
  ^-endosulfan sulfate, p,p'-DDD,  endrin,  endosulfan,
  p.p'-DDT,
                             C-6

-------
     TABLE C-6.  CONCENTRATION OF PCBs FOUND AT BACKGROUND STATIONS
                 AT THE 106-MILE SITE, SEPTEMBER 1987 (ng/L)
Plume
S8
S8
DB-2
DB-2
DB-2
DB-2
DB-2 .
DB-2
DB-3
DB-3
DB-3
Depth
(»)
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
24.5
24.5
24.5
6.0
6.0
6.0
Rep.
No.
1
2
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
Time After
T=0 (h)
BKG
BKG
BKG
BKG
BKG
BKG
BKG,
BKG
BKG
BKG
BKG
Clg(206)

-
^,
~
-
0.035
_
0.027
0.055
0.066
0.062
Compounds not found:   Cl2(08),  Cl3(18),  Cl3(18),  CU(52),  Cl4(44),  CU(66),
  ClsUOl),  Cl5(118),  Cl6(153),  Cl5(105),  Cle(138)f  Cl6(187),  Cl6(128),
  Cl7(180),  Cl7(170),  Cl8(195)
                                     C-7

-------

-------
                     APPENDIX  D
 SUMMARY OF LABORATORY ANALYSES FOR DUMPING EVENTS
DB-1, DB-2, AND DB-3, 106-MILE SITE, SEPTEMBER 1987

-------

-------
UJ

UJ
ex

to

O CJ

a: •—
o a:
u. =5
   o

t— UJ
to to
LU
a. LU
o Z

h^ v£>
LU UJ
CD  I
   CD
o a

< LU
— a.
a
l_ UJ
CD O
OC <
   to



8S
<— 0£
_J U.

to o
   LU
O t— («•.
LU LJ CO
O LU CTi
Z —I —i
LU _J
O. O   •
tO O Q£
2    LU
tO tO CD
   LU an
      to
 I
o
               o


            ^5 ^5
            fl5 tS
            ft) C
            CD 0>


               <
               T?

               ?
   u

   a>
             E -u  it  2"
 0.0
 E *M>4

to
                   o.  •
                   a>  o
                   c. E
                   a>—'
                35-0)
               —  o  >
               Q_    LU
         »3-<3-«s-iocy»CT>CT»m «^ PO


                  CMCMCMOOO-«~*"-CMCMCMLncO-^


                  ^rt^OCJO^-^— r^*
                                                                                            ' O <-O PO
                                                                                          -^ -* o o
                                                                                                CO PO
                                                                                                CO O
                           oooooooooooo
                                                                                          CM CM CM PO
                           COCOCOCMCMCMCOCOCOOOOPOPOPO>O r«^ PV P*. r»». r^.cococococococococo cr< cr> cr^ p">
CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO
aoooooooooo
                                                               COCOCOCO CO CO CO CO CO
                                                               ooooooooo
      VO P^

     ;i§-
                           "- CM PO »-« CM
                                             -^CMPO-^CMPO" CD CD
                                                                            =200
                                                                                                               -a
                                                                                                                (B
                                                                                              o
                                                                                              ex
                                                                                              o
                                                                                                          a>    -i-
                                                                                        u    i—
                                                                                        o     -a  ex
   •t-5 eu -i-
  - aj  s_  s_
*j  i-  a>  a>
-C    -U  Q-  •

-•- *j -r-  a> •—
 a>  (o H-  E -a
 5 ~o     3  13

 a;   - o 'cx^
 S-  C        13
 rC  S-  OJ 4-i  >


T3     IB T3 -M
•^  s-  s-  o  o
.—   '—  cx E  ii
 C —  CX IB
•—' U_ < OO 
-------
    LU
                 63  e
    IO
    UJ
 => CM


 UJ CO
                         V
                      s a.
                         — >—
   uj a.
o —
UJ
                      S.  0)

                      «  e
                     4_l ••-
                     fcO H-
                      0)


                     Is
                      (B
                     to
                      Q. ••
                  5 s_ cj
                  — o >
                                  oc\j
                                  O O
                                     CM
                                  CM CM
                                  10
                                 CM —<
                                                       — « — • vn no co
                                                       — M p>-| •- • — < O
                                                    O O O O O O
                                                       — O -^ O
                                                    O O O O O O
                                                      oo r>^ ~* rn •-•
                                                   —• O O O C3 C5
                                                      in CT> —* •—i >
                                                   u-> 10
                                                               «D in  II    —
                                    »^ o^ un *~*
                                 oooooovnunmooo
                                 O O O ro mrocsiCMCMOOO
                                 CM CM CM
                                                           CM CM CM
                                 eococo—"— ''-•CMCMCMOOO
                                                                           OJ
                                                  -
                                 cooocococococoooaocococo
                                 o o o o o o o
                                                              a o
                                                                              OJ
CMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCM
 i   i  J^  i   i   i   i   i   i   i   i  i
                                                                           O)
                                                                           o c.

                                                                           SJ •_>
                                                                          4. _i>


                                                                          O 2.
                                 D-2

-------
   to
S O
to —«
UJ
C£ UJ
g<

Z  I
UJ CO
c- a
h-
«C UJ
uj a.
cs
   UJ

II
   UJ
^ to
2g
cc u.
c:
to uj
a —' r*-
— _J co
_j o en
o <-> —
to
   to cs
O UJ UJ
UJ «C f-
Cu tO UJ
to    c.
9 UJ to
<    —
<•")

a
                c!
                01:

               *J
            6  
            <0  3
            0>  C
            CO  O
               4->
               4-J
                  to.
                     o>
                     CJ
                 to -^.
                 to c?>
            fl^ 0^ C^
            E 4-* u •—»
                  U OJ
                  <9 E
                  C.O
                  E —

                  to


                  c. •
               = 1- O
               — c >
               c_    __•
                           ozoozzoooooo^^^oooooooooooo
                           o    oo       o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
                           — ur)Lr)^-^-«3-»T^-iDcyicricri*r^r<3-
                            • JS««ZZ»»»«  ••••••••	
                           l^    ^f ^^       p^) p^) fo ^^ (^t ^^ ^^ »i«^ w«^ ^^ f*^ f*^ ^*^ ^5 ^^ ^"^ ^^^ ^"^ ^^ c^ C"*
                           CsJ    LO C7^

                            • Z  •  •
                           o    o o
                           in < un vo
                            • z  •  •

                           f^    10 1^
                                                           O"i
                                             OOOOOOCMCMCSIOOOOOOOOOOOO





                                             «-<—H^<«-ip^.irjmroroO'-<--r«» — r-.OOOCO«—< ^O


                                             unmtn-M—-^*rororo—H—<»-<»-<-H»-«CNJCSJCSJ--«'—•—
                                                                             -0*0
                           CM
                                 CM ro o
                           ro    —
                           OOOOOOOOOOOO-" —


                              Lnufty3iOvDOOO'~>r*»f^.»— — ^O'lOiC^OOO— «—<— "Cvd'CSJCM
                              cococococoooococococ?s(yva^coooco<^cno^oooooo
                              CO CO CO CO CO CT> O"> CTi CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CTi CT> CT> CT< C^ CT>
                                             vO WO vO O O O *O O vO O C3 O i-O LO eft vD
                                                      CSJCMCS)          c\!C\jcsicororo
                                          Itp C2 d^ -^ CC^ d^ dO CC CO CD CCt CO CO CO CO CO CO
                                          1'^ r^ f^ ^i **""• r^* _*^ -*~^ -^ 1*""'; i^^ J^t f~^ ^^ ^^ if^ "^^
                                                                                                   O O O
                                                                                                   CVICSJCM
                                                    D-3

-------
 ^E rt3
 to •s
 ft) C
03 0>
                E
                0)
                O
•st
 o
o
                      csj CM c\j co CO CO esJ eo «r csj r^ vo r^ r^ r^»
                      0 o o in in in in PO — i — . m ro CM csj CNJ
                      C300 C500000 OC5COOC5
                           C3 — < -< « 0 C5 C3 O
                                                      O O C3 O
                                                                                      c\j en «• «s- «- ro
                                                                                      r< S o o o 2
                                                                                             C5 C5 C5 O C3 O
                                                                                            CD -^ — 4
                                                                                                     O O 0
      CO.           _             _
              vbvoCocricncy>CMcriCMCMcri(ciininin                           Co Co CM S m
     ^       CJooinunincM*CMCM  '  '  ' — ^« o
                                                                                        CM CM «••* f—t <-*
         «/»

         C



        cS




              Z^    J^S^?*^!^^      """2   *"*    CM«3-Or-»-^CO»3-rO>OO^OCM    O
               .1^^^^               •—.-^r<.OOO      OO   O    OOOOOOO--*—^CM'-io'o


      H^:                                          *"* f"> """"" "^ 'v' ^' ^' "^ "" "" ~~          ~'


     «-)

     '"e    5:^^^Z3H^cM^S222rx'r^rv*Lnir'Lni:OOOcOv?'£?y:? — r? -   coeoco
              cw ^^j ^^ co co PO co co co co co co co co co co co co co co co
              r~* *™« i~i i-"^ ^"K »^H ^^ r-^ *-^ ^—H ^—< r-H ^^ *«^ ^^ r"^ ^^ »«««4 r~^ ^^H (••'H


              ^^^CMCMr^^M^^^-'W'Lni.ni.nvpvpirjr^f^r^.

     f 2  '

     to

     c.  .
     *•: _p



              CM CM CM O O O


     ft3 *"**^    ro ro ro          CM CM CM on f»") ro          »-H »-H «—< ro ro ro
         E    C
         =3 5- 
               i   >   i   i   >   i   i  i  i  i   i   i   i   i   t   i   i   i   i   i   i   i   i
              o^gagcccscaescacscacocacacoco.coeoeQcs -co ca ca
                                                      0-4

-------
 5
r->
 I
                 O '
                 u g
     o        ooooooooo    ~«     OOOOOOOOO         •  O O O O

 O)  3
 eo  e
     OJ  _
        IB
       _4?

               'QOO-*—« — OOO           O — "-4 O








    >4v>--»

           c

           u
           ^*     ^^* ^^ ^^ ^7*1 ^y\ ^^ ^^ ^y *B^                 ^P CO

                  •   •••••••• ^^ ^^ *^^   •  •  •   •

                 CSJCMCMCMCMCM-H— •—          —t «SI CM ^







                        CU    O)           JD

          o






                  •   •I   •  I    ...........
                 O —*     O    OCM-^OO-^CMOO—"O

 CU  0) O'~>


H-«c            ^ "^ "^ °^ °^ °? ^ ^ ^ 1" ~ ^7 **! **2 ^
                 mmrnmmr^fompo*r«3-



       0)	
                 ooooooooooooooo-^

       ="Q     poooaappopoooooo
       re *~         "-_,,I__^^^



       a..     —"Csiro — csim—"CMPO—^CMm — CMroro
           o
                                    — — « — • CNJ CM CM
                                                                  — — — CM
                 """i <^™> ro ro  f") ro r^ r*^ m n"} p*^ ro <*o ro ro f*"^
                  i   i   i   i   i   i   i    i   i   i   i   i   i   i   i    i
                                                                                                   •o
                                                                                                    cu
                                                                                                    u
                                                                                                    cu
                                                                                                    a>
                                                                                             l/l    •«-
                                                                                             0)     £
                                                                                            •—     CO)
                                                                                             d.    •— *J
                                                                                             cu     do
                                                                                             s-     c  cu

                                                                                             t.     J="a?
                                                                                             O     — *J
                                                                                                   •C (O
                                                                                             C     •— -53

                                                                                            J=     (O   -
                                                                                            •+*     t- c
                                                                                                      o
                                                                                             trt     O •*—

                                                                                             O)        T3
                                                                                            •—     CU C
                                                                                         L. •-  >,^: cu

                                                                                        .= -— — — o
                                                                                         a. >  cu  cu c
    cu ••—  cr; cu  «->
  •  CL     O  s-  jc
 cu     *—  i-  PO  CT)
F—  CU fQ  CU 4-*  •••
-3  E -r- 4_)     OJ
 o  =! s_  cu  i-  s


 13     rs -O i—  4.
 > •*•» s  cu -<^  tj
<  IT3     C >4—  4-»
       •o —
•J -S CU  03 -O  -B
 O  CU i- i— —  • —
1Z — CU  SLi	

 H  ="—  cu  >  >
                                                 D-5

-------


LU
^»
M«
ce. co
o
U_ LU
co —
_j "r
•=> o
CO O
LU -H
jg
LU
O f—

< <
£a
•S ^T
LU 1
^ ea
j_0
zs1
< S
Wi
••J
ca a.
a LU
< <
>^to

Si
— cc
CO LU
=> O
1— LU
co LU r^.
O ^ CO
— _i en
_i O —
O  OTM
a; = E
CD C *—
Q) C
4W fO
4W O
^C «C





la
4^ ^^
•^ e
••- o
ja u.
i. C O>
3 
S
i
«
^
_j
co «»»
co en
H- E

w
&) —


4)
^
s a
CO


' d. .
O) O
cc z
Jf
(-. e;
bM* ES
o> -—^
a
CJ 4J
5 U 4J
•— O >
£. LU


0 O CO O O
O O —< <—< •— i ro ro
«t O O O O O
o o o o o




CO CO Ot Cft O^ r<»« r^
^* ^^ «^ r^» r*^ ^^ vo  UT> LT5 LT>
< CM CM CM r^ f>»
0 0 O O 0




CM CM »»• T O
OO<:COCOCO«T«T
CM CM rx r>» r^ un un



ns ja ja



f— 1^ ^^ ^A «^ a,^^ .^^ .^ ^.
OOro<5T—*^mr>.
ro ^ O ro O i - i CD
— < CM
OOOCMCMCMCMCM

^^

-«4 ^^ <~^ n^ c^ r**^ fO ro
f~~i g**, f^ ^, ^— ^~ ^A ^^
;^-^ f-^ f—^ v^ ^« ^^ ^^ ^p
OOOOOOOC3


CM CM CM CO CO OO *T ^
oooooooo

^c ^c ^c ^c ^c ^c *^ «^

•^CMCO>— «CMrO«-O
^
•o
ja

3
4-1

.^

^^
4-1
If3
.O
"^
2
o
4-1
C
o
4_)

o
Q.

C


B

flM*
cn
•r—
U
. dj .
>^*-> CO
£f £ to
^^*3 ^^mL1
•^ QJ CO
t- 5- =
O) OJ 03
. d.-uJ
OJ f— OJ
T3 3 U

ng Q.
> *-> 0) 3
4J -!3 ^ U-
O O) 1- O
Ci. C) d
II ' " *^ ^2
03 C. O)
ZO?^.^
D-6

-------
 TABLE  D-5.   C.  perfn'nqens RESULTS FOR SAMPLES
COLLECTED IN SEWAGE PLUME DB-1 AT THE
106-MILE SITE DURING SEPTEMBER 1987

Sample
ID
AAD869
AAD869
AAD869
AAD870
AAD870
AAD870
AAD866
AAD866
AAD866
AAD871
AAD871
AAD871
AA0876
AAD876
AAD876
AAD858
AAD858
AAD858
AAD867
AAD867
AAD867
AAD872
AAD872
AAD872
AAD877
Plume
or
Event
DB1
D81
DB1
DB1
DB1
DB1
DB1
DB1
DB1
DB1
DB1
DB1
DB1
DB1
DB1
DB1
DE
DB1
DB1
DB1
DB1
DB1
DB1
DB1
DB1

Rep.
No.
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1

Depth
(ra)
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
19.4
19.4
19.4
21.8
21.8
21.8
22.3
22.3
22.3
20.3

Start
Time
1648
1648
1648
1702
1702
1702
1738
1738
1738
1823
1823
1823
1941
1941
1941
0818
0818
0818
1740
1740
1740
1826
1826
1826
1950
Time
After
T-0
(h)
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.23
0.23
0.23
0.83
0.83
0.83
1.55
1.55
1.55
2.88
2.88
2.88
-8.50
-8.50
-8.50
0.87
0.87
0.87
1.60
1.60
1.60
3.03
c.
perfn'nqens
(Counts/
100 mL)
TNTC
TNTC
TNTC
TNTC
TNTC
TNTC
TNTC
TNTC
TNTC
TNTC
TNTC
TNTC
TNTC
TNTC
361.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
87.38
17.56
26.94
3.06
3.00
3.81
33.19
TNTC= Too Numerous To Count
                          D-7

-------
  TABLE  D-6.  C.  perfringens  RESULTS FOR SAMPLES
             COLLECTED  IN SEWAGE  PLUME DB-2 AT THE
             106-MILE SITE DURING SEPTEMBER 1987
Sample
ID
AAD878
AAD878
AAD878
AAD881
AAD881
AAD881
AAD882
AAD882
AAD882
AAD880
AAD880
AAD880
Plume
or
Event
DB-2
DB-2
DB-2
DB-2
DB-2
DB-2
DB-2
DB-2
DB-2
DB-2
DB-2
DB-2
Rep
No.
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
Depth
(«)
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
10.7
10.7
10.7
34.0
34.0
34.0
Start
Time
1027
1027
1027
1445
1445
1445
1742
1742
1742
1927
1927
1927
Tine
After
T=0
(h)
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.30
4.30
4.30
7.25
7.25
7.25
9.00
9.00
9.00
C.
perfrTngens
(Counts/
100 *L)
TNTC
207.00
TNTC
292.00
71.17
43.56
201.44
265.44
299.75
6.56
16.00
5.25
TNTC • Too Numerous To Count.
                            D-8

-------
TABLE D-7.  C. perfringens RESULTS FOR SAMPLES
            COLLECTED IN SEWAGE PLUME DB-3 AT
            THE 106-MILE DEEPWATER DUMPSITE
            DURING SEPTEMBER 1987
Sample
ID
AAD885
AAD885
AAD885
AAD886
AAD886
AAD886
AAD900
AAD900
AAD900
AAD891
AAD891
AAD891
AAD892
AAD892
AAD892
AAD904
AAD904
AAD904
AAD908
AAD908
AAD908
AAD909
AAD909
AAD909
AAD898
AAD898
AAD898
AAD887
AAD887
AAD887
AAD889
AAD889
AAD889
AAD893
AAD893
AAD893
AAD899
AAD899
AAD899
Plume
or
Event
DB-3
DB-3
DB-3
DB-3
DB-3
DB-3
DB-3
DB-3
DB-3
DB-3
DB-3
DB-3
DB-3
DB-3
DB-3
DB-3
DB-3
DB-3
DB-3
DB-3
DB-3
DB-3
DB-3
DB-3
DB-3
DB-3
DB-3
DB-3
DB-3
DB-3
DB-3
DB-3
DB-3
DB-3
DB-3
DB-3
DB-3
DB-3
• DB-3
Rep
No.
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
Depth
(m)
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
5.0
6.0
6.0
10.4
10.4
10.4
10.7
10.7
10.7
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.6
20.6
20.6
20.1
20.1
20.1
20.7
20.7
20.7
Start
Time
1111
1111
1111
1130
1130
1130
1147
1147
1147
1211
1211
1211
1311
1311
1311
1415
1416
1416
1522
1522
1522
1532
1532
1532
1431
1431
1431
1148
1148
1148
1222
1222
1222
1326
1326
1326
1418
1418
1418
Time
After
T=0
(h)
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.32
0.32
0.32
0.60
0.60
0.60
1.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
3.08
3.08
3.08
4.18
4.18
4.18
4.35
4.35
4.35
3.33
3.33
3.33
0.62
0.62
0.62
1.18
1.18
1.18
2.25
2.25
2.25
3.12
3.12
3.12
C.
perfrTngens
(Counts/
100 ml)
16.13
0.44
257.00
231.00
166.00
187.00
62.33
171.00 .
TNTC
121.00
100.00
80.00
TNTC
43.40
27.00
20.00
4.25
33.94.
153.00
149.00
140.00
0.25
4.56
21.38
83.67
280.00
133.00
0.81
0.88
1.06
1.63
1.75
1.13
4.00
69.67
29.31
21.25
22.00
2.88
                      D-9

-------
    TABLE D-7.  (Continued)
Sample
ID
AAD910
AAD910
AAD910
AAD890
AAD890
AAD890
AAD894
AAD894
AAD894
Plume
or
Event
DB-3
DB-3
DB-3
DB-3
DB-3
DB-3
DB-3
DB-3
DB-3
Rep
No.
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
Depth
(»)
20.2
20.2
20.2
35.8
35.8
35.8
33.2
33.2
33.2
Start
Time
1525
1525
1525
1233
1233
1233
1314
1314
1314
Time C.
After perfrTngens
T=0 (Counts/
(h) 100 ml)
4.23
4.23
4.23
1.37
1.37
1.37
2.05
2.05
2.05
0.44
0.31
0.19
2.31
2.19
1.88
52.00
57.67
9.13
TNTC = Too Numerous To Count.
                          D-10

-------
 TABLE D-8.  C. perfrinqens RESULTS FOR SAMPLES
COLLECTED IN SEWAGE
106-MILE SITE DURING
Sample
ID
AAD912
AAD912
AAD912
AAD913
AAD913
AAD914
AAD914
AAD914
Plume
or
Event
DB-4
DB-4
DB-4
DB-4
DB-4
DB-4
DB-4
DB-4
Rep
No.
1
2
3
1
2
1
2
3
Depth
6
6
6
6
6
10
10
9
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.50
.50
.50
Start
Time
0001
0001
0001
0443
0443
0443
0443
0457
PLUME DB-4 AT THE
SEPTEMBER 1987
Time
After
T=0
(h)
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.72
4.72
4.72
4.72
4.72
C.
perfrTnqens
(Counts/
100 ml)
TNTC
TNTC
110.00
18.88
21.19
11.06
12,75
10.56
TNTC = Too Numerous To Count.
                           D-ll

-------
  TABLE D-9.  RESULTS OF TRACER SAMPLES ANALYZED FROM PLUME DB-2,
              106-MILE SITE, SEPTEMBER 1987

Depth
(«)
6.0
6.0
6.0
10.7
10.7
10.7
Time
After
T-0
0.0
0.0
0.0
7.25
7.25
7.25

Rep.
No.
1
2
3
1
2
3b

Cu
Gtg/U
14.74
7.87
0.26
1.07
1.88
2.00

Fe*
Ug/U
117.73
58.52
1.24
7.02
16.00
15.85

Pb
G*g/0
3.25
1.61
0-05
0.19
0.38
0.38

Zna

13.37
6.93
0.16
1.90
2.20
2.00
aSamples are blank corrected.
lvalue is an average of duplicate samples.
                                D-12

-------
TABLE D-10.
RESULTS FROM TRACER SAMPLES ANALYZED FROM PLUME
DB-3, 106-MILE-SITE, SEPTEMBER 1987
Time After
Depth T=0 Rep.
(m) (h) No.
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
10.7
10.7
10.7
10.9
10.9
10.9
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.1
20.1
20.1
20.2
20.2
20.2
20.5
20.6
20.6
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.32
0.32
0.32
0.60
0.60
0.60
1.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
3.08
3.08
3.08
3.33
3.33
3.33
8.40
8.40
8.40
0.62
0.62
0.62
2.25
2.25
2.25
4.23
4.23
4.23
1.18
1.18
1.18
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3b
1
2c
3
' 1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3c
1
2
. 3
Cu
(*3/L)
0.14
0.14
50.01
32.27
16.87
19.22
28.65
1.13
0.14
1.90
4.25
14.39
17.00
7.63
5.68
0.19
0.32
0.40
2.62
5.32
6.26
0.62 ,
0.64
0.66
0.16
0.15
0.14
0.20
0.78
0.27
1.06
0.40
0.55
0.14
0.15
0.13
Fe*
G»9/L)
0.56
0.07
295.14
192.89
107.19
122.58
174.10
7.20
0.12
11.05
23.04
92.54
98.21
43.65
38.21
0.81
1.29
1.86
15.46
27.30
33.18
3.19
2.84
3.01
0.54
1.35
0.23
0.60
6.87
2.78
7.53
2.09
2.74
0.25
0.40
0.22
Pb
to/L)
0.02
0.02
51.51
35.71
18.87
22.63
32.45
1.37
0.02
2.05
4.22
16.07
19.78
8.89
7.59
0.09
0.28
0.35
3.29
6.32
11.22
16.38
0.61
0.70
0.31
0.04
0.02
0.07
0.68
0.22
0.98
0.33
0.49
0.03
0.04
0.02
Zna
G*g/U
•0.03
0.02
49.16
39.69
16.24
17.92
23.83
1.00
0.04.
1.88
3.91
14.60
16.26
7.59
6.16
0.06
0.17
0.20
4.75
6.02
5.72
4.18
0.52
0.59
0.53
0.37
0.06
0.12
0.91
0.20
1.07
0.37
0.60
0.08
0.10
0.03
                                   D-13

-------
 TABLE  D-10.  (Continued)
Depth
(n)
20.7
20.7
20.7
33.2
33.2
33.2
35.8
35.8
35.8
Time After
T=0
00
3.12
3.12
3.12
2.05
2.05
2.05
1.37
1.37
1.37
Rep.
No.
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
Cu
0.14
0.18
0.31
0.14
0.26
0.14
0.12
0.11
0.15
Fea
(rt/U
0.67
0.75
1.81
1.66
1.82
1.07
0.55
0.51
0.50
Pb
0.04
0.55
0..21
0.07
0.20
0.05
0.02
0.02
0.02
Zna
0.05
0.06
0.20
0.09
0.20
0.09
0.11
0.04
0.09
^Results are blank corrected.
bA hole was found in the neck of the sample bottle.
cValue is an average of duplicate samples analysis.
                                   D-14

-------






•
^^
c?
«H
ee
,UJ
CO
5
a.
UJ
to
•
UJ
^
to
LU
J
> MM
1
V0
2

CM"
i
CO
a
^
UJ
>
UJ
o
Q.
0

fc^T
to
^*
	 t
«^
SE
<
>-
h-
«e
o*
cc i
UJ I
^^ r
< [
X 1
r
i
^*
^^
^•4
i
ca
UJ
__i
so
<
h—







2*
""


cc



cu &
E *->
H- <
w
^^ JZ!
g-"i
«5 U
CO O

^>
"w
c

















J
^^
^















" d
^c



0
u
>—


*Z|-
">—


in 'ro «s-
ro r*^ ^-«
CM — f^
•— CM — «
in in
en in CM
CM CM CM
•-« OO
o o o
000
V V V

CO«TO
ro co co
«• o o
000
VO ^ O
«s- ao m
PO CM CM
000
CM CM
m co PO
PO CM CM
•

^F CD P*")
m CM in
-« tn «r
CM O O

*^y PO C^
c»» co o
V — « CM
0 O O

^ in «r
en — « — «
O O 0
o o o

•o
ro ^f r***
•CT> CTt C7t
o o o
vo va in
o «s- o
o o o
* • •
o o o
u
— « CM PO




O 0 O



o o o
L^*i ^_^~j L^


«J3CftO
vo «-4 m
vo c?< r^

wo r*. — <
O O —
CM ^ «T
O O O
O OO
000
V V V

«s-e*e*
o o o
000
^ CM VO
in r^ to
CM CM CM
o o o
IO PO O
\O PO ^Q
en co o
o o o


PO co' co
*~ 1 -^ — <
000

CM CM CM
0 O O

O CM Pn
P1*) f*} CM
O O O
OO O


CM in «r

-,« —
CM
"O 4) A)
O
^•^ CM PO I]
II
|j
II
II
0 O O
O 0 O ||
^y^ ^y% CT\


0 O O
<=• «S- «3-
m ro m

























CJ
c-o
^
B
«
«/>
• U
i/> O
f- t*_
>-, a> •
^ 4-> ^f.
«s n c
c u >-o o
*j i. a> o
fO O fsl U
i. •*-> >^ a.
a>  JE
Q 4-»
(D i— *J
•T3 O (A
••- O> C trt
• S_ *J 0)
•O "O IB to •—
0> >> U <0
, » ^K ^^ ^^ j^
4-* ^^ •*- f. C
U •— O
a; >, o.  •— •*->
s- s- a. «s
o -o E s-
U O >*- fO *J
sj o m c
-iJ >. 0)
c i — s: 1/1 u
^J fljj fl3 *^" 5^
— c: o JE: o
C2 < S •— C_J
fc ja u -o a>
D-15

-------


r««.
g
• ^
£
UJ
•
UJ
h—
UJ
cS
««4
•
§
H-
LU
UJ
g
flu
i
O
ANALYSI!
_j
h-
_l
(—v
O£
LU
CM
Q

LU
CD
«c





£
.^
w
3
l_
^3
£_J
-Q
^p
«
^r
c
a
(.
•>— •*-
h- <
V
^— ^
C.4-1
ro &
oo a
' _J
c





&>




L •
o
•V


^^^
CJ
^O O^ ^D
CM un csj
o o m
CD ^^ Ot
^ UT) IT)
^ csj r^
Csj ^ O
ro m in
OOO
c^ c^ ^^
«»• in vo
in vo tn
CM — O
o o m
•^ in r>.
VO V PO
ooo
p^ r** in
r*+ ao in
CM CO «•
PO r*. «•
in in r*.
CM Ol CM
PO «— l i— <
^i •»• r*»
VO O CM
CM — < O
'-• in CM
PO CO VO
— * o o
ooo
CT^ CO CO
O"* CT^ O>
ooo
m PO o^
ooo
ooo
•— " CM PO
CO CO CO

ooo
VO vo vo
O VO CM
PO CO l-»
CM CO "O"
in in o
Ot O VO
eo m o\
O O r^
CO CO CO
in PO co
o tnpo
— « o o
PO r*. *r
•-H PO CM
««r PO v
o o —
in r-«. o
^^ G^ ^^
>•* vo vo
m CM «r
XT
«f O O
CO •— i f— i
CM CO CM
-H O -^
vo in in
in CM in
vo *r «r
f~* ^^ tf^
CM O» O
VO PO O
0 O «T
OOO
^^ ^^ ^^
^5 ^^ ^3
^ O -H
f^«» CO PO
CM O T
O O CM
OOO
•^ CM PO
in m m


ooo











•
o
4-> >
C^>,
o 
C^ >*i CJ

ft) >k g^
I- -Q 3
s- -o
O T3
U O) •*.
M O
-^ >-,
C •— C
i— c: a>
CD < s:
D-16

-------
    TABLE D-13. WATER QUALITY PESTICIDE ANALYSES.  DUMPING EVENTS
                DB-2 AND DB-3,  106-MILE SITE,  SEPTEMBER 1987
Plume
DB-2
DB-2
DB-2
DB-2
DB-2
DB-2
DB-3
DB-3
DB-3
DB-3
DB-3
MBBV=m
Depth
(»)•
6.0
6.0
6.0
10.1
10.5
10.3
6.0
6.0
6.0
7.0
5 - 7
ammmmtmeam
Rep.
No.
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
OMHBOM
Tine After
T«0 (h)
4.5
4.6
4.7
7.9
8.1
8.3
4.4
4.5
4.7
5.0
5.6
c-BHC
_
—
*
1.09
1.35
1.37

—
^
^

7-BHC
1.95
0.73
0.27
w • te /
0.32
0.41
1,0
1.59
1.26
0.52
0.493
0,38
•mmi^^^^^m
Oieldrin
(ng/L)



0.14
0.16
0.019




-
""• • ^— -• i sj^as^
p.p'-DDE



0.11
0.16
0.015




-
aMean of two repicate analyses.
-Means Not detected.
Compounds not found: heptachlor, aldrin, heptachlor epoxide,
                     oc-endosulfan, endn'n aldehyde, ^-endosulfan
                     sulfate, p.p'-ODD,  endn'n,  ^-endosulfan,
                     p.p'-DDT.
                                0-17

-------
      TABLE 0-14.   WATER QUALITY PCS ANALYSES,  DUMPING EVENTS DB-2 AND DB-3,
                   106-MILE SITE,  SEPTEMBER 1987 (Concentration in ng/L)
Plume
DB-2
DB-2
DB-2
DB-2
DB-2
DB-2
DB-3
DB-3
DB-3
DB-39
DB-3
JMHOBMCE
Depth
(•)
6.0
6.0
6.0
10.1
10.5
10.3
6.0
6.0
6.0
7.0
5-7
mmatammmtm
Rep.
No.
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
•MRBMBM
Ti»e
XMh)
4.5
4.6
4.7
7.9
8.1
8.3
4.4
4.5
4.7
5.0
5.6
••MBKHmMn

PCS Isomer
CI6U53) C16(138) C17U87) Cl7(180

0.056
0.024
^
-
0.08
0.16 0.12

-

f
0.032
0.048
^••^•^ i

0.21
OA4

0.02
0.22
0.10
0.08
0.14
) Cl7(l70) Clg(206;

0.026
0.21
"
-
0.21
0.15
0.08
aMean of two replicate analyses.
-Means Not Detected.
Compounds not found:  C12(08). Cl3(18)t C13(18),  C14(52), C14(44), C14(66),
                                C15(105), C15(118),  C16(128); Cls(195)
                                    D-18

-------