sgs^^,aii^s«afe«jp,:«j
" *"-&"""
!M&feS£& ^w^^'g''"^" v*1'. V'-T"^ '^J ^•'tW'ffe.&B't T^JSRSP ST
mmmm
tegS*
- Enwbnffler® Rrptecficiri
-
im
A Framework that Improves Decision Making
The Clean Water Act (CWA) requires that states and tribes monitor and report on
the condition of all waters of the United States, including jurisdictional wetlands.
Scientists and resource managers rely upon wetland monitoring data to assess
wetland health and to guide decision-making. Understanding the causes and
effects of wetland impairment can help improve management decisions in
watersheds. Wetland monitoring is important to gauge the effectiveness of
wetland restoration projects and to help measure the environmental health of
watersheds.
Often, the most direct and effective way of evaluating the ecological condition of a
wetland is (1) to directly measure the condition of the wetlands biological community
and (2) to observe and measure the chemical and physical characteristics of a wetland and its surrounding
landscape.
Specific Applications of Monitoring Information
1. Evaluate the performance of protection and restoration activities - Wetland
monitoring data can be used to evaluate the success of management activities by '
including follow-up monitoring and assessments as a component of management
plans. By periodically conducting wetland assessments, managers can learn which
;.., activities work as planned and which do not work.
2. Support permitting decisions - Wetland monitoring data can be used to help
support permitting decisions made under CWA Sections 401 and 404 and other state,
tribal and local wetland programs. Information from wetland monitoring can be used
to ensure that a permitted activity is likely to comply with a state's water quality
standards. Monitoring information can also be used to define performance standards
for wetland mitigation sites. '
Scientists with the
Maine Department of
Environmental
Protection sample
macrqinvertebrates to
test wetland condition.
Intensive wetland monitoring helps
to test and refine the indicators
used in rapid wetland assessment.
-------
'!•• i I
Landscape wetland assessment methods are
used to evaluate cumulative impacts on
wetlands in a watershed.
A comprehensive wetland monitoring and assessment program ijs
implemented through three levels of effort. Work may begin at any
level, but each level builds upon the other. (
1. Landscape Assessment '
• Landscape assessments are used to characterize land uses and the
distribution and abundance of wetland types across an area.
• This level of assessment is used to determine the geographical
priorities where more intensive wetland monitoring is to Occur,
as well as identify environmental indicators that can be \
monitored to approximate wetland condition. ;
• The resulting data layers and landscape profiles provide valuable
information to guide wetland protection and restoration |
decisions, including the.location and design of compensatory
mitigation projects. i
2. Rapid Wetland Assessment \
• Rapid wetland assessments evaluate the general condition of individual wetlands using relatively simple indicators.
These assessment are based upon identifying stressors, such as road crossings, encroachment, tile drainage and pipe
discharges. I
• Rapid wetland assessment methods are used to monitor and report on the cumulative condition of wetlands in a
watershed, as well as identify sites where more intensive monitoring is needed.
• Results are also used in CWA Section 401/404 permitting and other wetland decisions and can be used to evaluate
the performance of compensatory wetland mitigation andiother restoration projects.
3. Intensive Site Assessment ,
• Intensive wetland monitoring is necessary to test the indicators used in rapid wetland assessments and to validate
landscape level assessments. Intensive Site Assessment requires the identification of wetland reference condition.
• This level of assessment is also used to determine the attainment of water quality standards at individual wetlands.
Monitoring data is used to refine wetland restoration or other management practices where degradation is found.
Office of water
Wet and Monitoring & Assessmen
,'•«; E!OTVr»V!i;y^^*SF »1 B ill "wtf'Mfifc
;.;,$!jst^ii;iiqpleiCp^i;ij^n|[Jj^,^;;,;;:K:^.;i
:;Pip|P;pM
,• Teachin9. aMylVMlOTlfc?."." v^ltei
On the Internet
Biological Assessment of "Wetlands www.epa.gov/owow/wetlands/bawwg
Bibliography: Hydrogeomorphic Method for Assessment of Wetlands http://itre.ncsu.edu/CTE/hgmbib.html
In Print ' ; - '
Bartoldus, Candy C. 1999. A Comprehensive Review of Wetland Assessment Procedures: A Guide for Wetland
Practioners. Environmental Concern, Inc. 196 pp. Available; from Environmental Concern, Inc., call (410) 745-9620,
orvisitthewebatwww.wetland.org. ;
U.S. EPA. 2002 Methods for Evaluating Wetland Condition Modules, Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC. Available online at http://www.epa.gov/ost/standards.
------- |