-------
The area to the west of the Menomonee River that is
zoned as an industrial park is presently undergoing develop-
ment and will continue to be developed during the course of
the project. The area still to be developed in the Indus-
trial Park is divided approximately in half by a surface
watershed divide (Fig. 11). Stations G6 and G7 will be
located on open and closed drains, respectively, and will
monitor runoff from the southern and northern portions of the
developing area respectively. The southern portion will
receive land treatment to reduce sediment losses. Unlike a
residential area, an industrial park is not developed all at
once, but rather construction activities are concentrated at
individual sites as each industry makes the decision to build
in the park. Consequently, two or three additional monitor-
ing stations will be installed as the need arises to collect
runoff from individual construction sites. Decisions regard-
ing the placement of these site specific stations cannot be
made at this time.
Kewaskum watershed
Only a portion of the approximately 8,000 acre Kewaskum
Creek Watershed is amenable to monitoring the effects of con-
servation treatments. The lowland area occupying the center
of the watershed, on either side of Kewaskum Creek, has no
significant erosion problem. Much of it is not actively
farmed and is relatively flat. The slopes along the eastern
edge of the watershed and in the southern tip are steep
enough to have severe erosion problems, but surface runoff
from these areas is quite diffuse and, consequently, does not
lend itself to monitoring.
The uplands west of Kewaskum Creek offer the best possi-
bilities for demonstrating improvements in water quality
resulting from implementation of conservation techniques.
This area is actively farmed and includes row crops, small
grains, hay, and livestock operations. The slopes are steep
enough to constitute an erosion hazard, and waterways are
24
-------
Mequon Road
LEGEND
Monitoring Site
To Be Developed With Treatment
To Be Developed Without Treatment
Developed Lot
o
SCALE
y.
MILES
FIG. 11 Developing portion of Industrial Park West showing
treated and nontreated areas to be monitored.
25
-------
sufficiently well-defined to allow monitoring. An SCS Con-
servation Needs Inventory accomplished during the planning
phase of this project identified those upland areas which
are most in need of conservation practices and eliminated
from consideration those lands which are presently being
farmed under SCS guidelines and on which water quality would,
consequently, be difficult to improve. From this informa-
tion two small upland subwatersheds were selected for moni-
toring. Figure 12 shows the selected subwatersheds and their
locations in the Kewaskum Watershed.
The sites at which monitoring stations will be installed
in the Kewaskum North (K-North) and the Kewaskum South (K-
South) subwatersheds are shown in Figs. 13 and Hf, respec-
tively. Station Kl will be used to monitor drainage from
all of K-North—an area of about 34-0 acres—and K6 will
monitor drainage from the 275 acre watershed of K-South.
These subwatersheds contain mostly cropland, with some con-
centration of livestock in feedlots and barnyards. Runoff
from eroding cropland is characterized by high suspended
sediment loads and moderate concentration of nutrients.
Water draining from feedlots and barnyards generally con-
tains high levels of nutrients and oxygen demanding materials.
The sediment load from livestock areas can be quite variable.
The water quality data collected at sites Kl and K6 will
represent the composite effects of these land uses.
In order to separate the water quality effects of crop-
land and livestock operations, several additional stations
will be specifically located on drainage ways emanating from
lands having a predominant single use. Station K2 will be
located in a gully draining through cattle and hog feedlots.
Station K3 will monitor runoff from about 165 acres of cropland
with no concentration of livestock. Station KU will be installed
directly below a large barnyard area. While this area does not
actually lie in the K-North subwatershed, it will be a worth-
while site to monitor because it has both an animal waste problem
and an erosion problem due to the animals being confined on a
steep, bare slope. Station K5 will be situated on a gully in the
26
-------
FIG. 12 Kewaskum Watershed showing location (shaded) of
K-North and K-South Subwatersheds.
27
-------
SCALE
MILES
20 Ft. Contour
Interval
LEGEND
Monitoring Site
Livestock Concentration
Contributing Areas
Intermittent Streams
County Highways
o
FIG. 13 Kewaskum Subwatershed
monitoring sites.
(K-North) showing location of
28
-------
10 ft. contour interval
LEGEND
Monitoring Site O
Livestock Concentration @
SCALE
x
MILES
FIG. 14 Kewaskum Subwatershed (K-South) showing location
of monitoring sites.
29
-------
K-South subwatershed which carries runoff from an area of about
70 acres of cropland which presently has severe erosion problems
and which receives applications of animal manure during the
winter months.
These six monitoring stations will be installed during the
spring and early summer of 1975. The implementation of the
selected conservation practices will be delayed until late summer
and fall of 1976. This will allow the collection of a year's
runoff data from untreated land and will provide a comparison of
water quality before and after the application of conservation
techniques and an evaluation of the effectiveness of these
techniques in improving water quality.
Land Treatment
Germantown watershed
Land treatment measures to be employed in the urbaniz-
ing watersheds include not only soil conservation and sedi-
ment control practices but also the modification of existing
drainage ways to facilitate monitoring.
The main drainage channel through Jefferson Park, which
carries runoff from a substantial area south of Jefferson
Park, presently follows a meandering path through the south-
ern end of Legend Acres. The existing channel will be
blocked before it enters Legend Acres, and a new drainage
way will be constructed to shorten the course of this chan-
nel and bypass Legend Acres. As a result of this reversal
of drainage, site G4 will be examining only the southern
half of Legend Acres (see Fig. 10). The entire channel
through Jefferson Park will be modified to improve flow,
including a provision for additional culverts under South
Division Road, and will be stabilized with vegetation,
mulches, and rock riprap. The Village of Germantown had
planned to make these modifications eventually, perhaps over
a period of several years, as development of the area dic-
tated. To provide a stable channel that will not be subject
30
-------
to future modifications, and thus to facilitate the collection
of meaningful water quality data, this work will be completed
at the earliest possible date and before the installation
of sites G2 and G4-. Similar channel modification and stabi-
lization, on a smaller scale, will be carried out on the
drainage ways serving the northern portion of Legend Acres
and the industrial park.
The measures to control erosion and sediment will con-
sist basically of mulches and vegetation to reduce erosion
and sediment settling basins to remove eroded materials
from the runoff water. Initially, a protective cover of
vegetation will be established on the entire area to be
treated. This will be followed by grading, sloping, fertil-
izing, mulching, seeding, and sodding as required to re-
establish vegetation on lands disturbed in street construc-
tion, installation of public utility services, and the exca-
vation of basements. Disturbed areas that are scheduled for
additional disturbance within a short period of time will be
proteced by mulches alone, with no attempt to establish a
plant cover.
Since some erosion is probably unavoidable, sediment
retention basins will be constructed at the exit of the
drainage ways from the treated areas. These structures will
temporarily detain and thereby dissipate the energy of sur-
face runoff, allowing much of the suspended sediment to
settle out. Diversion channels to direct runoff waters into
sediment basins to reduce the erosion capacity of runoff
waters by shortening the effective slope length, or for such
other purposes as circumstances and project objectives may
dictate, may also be constructed. A tabulation of the esti-
mated land treatment and water pollution abatement measures
to be employed in the urbanizing watershed is given in
Table 4. Urban development in Germantown proceeds in a
controlled and orderly manner, in accord with a detailed and
comprehensive plan. Land treatment measures and water
quality monitoring are therefore constrained both in space
31
-------
Table 4. Conservation needs inventory and estimated cost of land treatment practices in the German town and Kcyaskum Watersheds
Preliminary treatments
Engineering Flood routine8 Earthmovine Finish grading
Site cost, $ cost, $ ftxlOJ $ ft^xlO-5 $
Main drainageway 4,800 1,300 26 17,300 528 8,500
North Legend Acres
drainageway 880 - 7 4,700 66 1,100
South Legend Acres 1,400 - - - 80 1,300
Middle Old Farm
(27 lots) 1,100 - - - 50 800
Drainageway 1,300 - 10 6,700 100 1,600
Treated area - - - - 100 1,600
Conservation Residue Contour Diversion or
cropping, management, strip-cropping field terraces
Farm no. acres acres acres $ ft' $
U>
N)
1 60 60 60 640
2 61 61 15 160
3 85 - 60 640 1,100 1,200
4 6 -----
5 - -----
6 - - 90 960
7 57 37 400
8 - - - - 650 700
9 - 48
10 25 -----
11 75 - 75 800
aFlood routing to be accomplished by SEWRPC.
Final treatments
Seeding Mulching Sodding Sediment basin Diversion terraces
ft^xlO3 $ ftxlO-1 $ ft^xlO-3 $ No. $ ft $
GERMANTOWN WATERSHED
Jefferson Park
528 15,700 295 6,600 -----
66 2,000 66 1,500 -----
125 14,400b 300 6,700 5 1,300 1 4,000 1,000 1,100
95 6,800b 180 4,000 3 700 1 4,000 250 300
100 3,000 100 2,200 1 300
626 33,200b 1,200 26,700 1 3,000 1 4,000 1,000 1,100
GERMANTOWN TOTAL
Minimum Grassed Manure storage Stone fence
tillage waterways facilities removalc Ponds
acres $ ft $ No. $ ft $ No. $
KEWASKUM CREEK WATERSHED
Kewaskum North (K-North)
400 400 - - 3,300 6,600 1 2,700
61 450 650 650 - - - -
3,500 3,500 1 10,700 2,200 4,400
1,100 1,100 1 10,700 -
1 10,700 -
800 800 1 10,700 -
Kewaskum South (K-South)
1,000 2,000
1 2,700
1 10,700 -
1,500 1,500 -
KEWASKUM TOTAL
PROGRAM GRAND TOTALa
Total $
54,200
10,180
30,200
17.700
112,280
15,100
69.600
84.700
196,980
Total $
10,340
1,260
20,440
11,800
10,700
12.460
67,000
2,400
700
2,700
10,700
2.300
18.800
85,800
$28_2_J80
"istone fence removal to allow installation of contour strip-cropping systems or diversion terraces.
Differs from land treatment total shown in budget ($310,000) to allow $27,220 as a contingency for land treatments which cannot be predicted.
-------
Technical assistance will be provided by UWEX. The UWEX staff
is knowledgeable in the monitoring of small watersheds and
has successfully installed and operated similar monitoring
stations on the White Clay Lake Watershed in Shawano County.
These stations, like Gl, will contain a flow control
structure such as a weir or flume with a continuous stage
height recorder on an automatic water sampler. The flow con-
trol device will be calibrated so that flow volume can be
derived directly from stage height. The sampler will be
triggered by stage height.
Monitoring Program
All of the monitoring sites will be on intermittent
streams or drains on streams with very low base flow. Most,
if not all, of the flow at these sites will consist of storm
water or snow melt runoff. The volume of flow will be measured
continuously at all sites. To insure the accuracy of^the^
data the monitoring equipment will be designed and maintained
and the measurements made in accordance with standard USGS
methods and/or procedures outlined in Agriculture Handbooks
Nos. 224 (7) and 268 (8).
An increase in stage height above any base flow due to
a runoff event will activate an automatic water sampler which
will collect samples at predetermined intervals until the
flow subsides. The samplers will have the capability to
increase or decrease sampling frequency in proportion to
flow and the relationship between sampling frequency and flow
at each site will be determined by the characteristic hydro-
graph at the site. Sampling frequency will be higher on
streams or drains with steeper gradients or which drain
smaller areas, or areas with a higher proportion of impervious
surface. At sites on continuously flowing streams, base flow
will also be sampled periodically, perhaps twice a month,
depending upon variability of flow and water quality parameters.
Immediately after each runoff event, i.e., within 24
hours, samples will be picked up from each monitoring site by
34
-------
and in time by circumstances beyond the control or influence
of project participants.
Kewaskum watershed
The land treatment measures to be evaluated by water
quality monitoring include techniques for controlling pollu-
tants from both cropland and livestock operations. Erosion
control measures generally consist of crop cultural prac-
tices, special uses of living and dead vegetative materials
the use of structures for controlling the flow of surface
waters, and combinations of these. Protection of water
quality from the deleterious effects of the great amounts of
manure and bedding produced by concentrating livestock in
barns, barnyards and feedlots will be achieved through the
use of manure storage facilities, surface water control prac-
tices and properly timed disposal by field spreading
A tabulation of the land treatments and water pollution
abatement measures to be employed is given in Table 4
These measures will be designed and applied in accordance
with the SCS Technical Guide. Manure storage facilities will
be^designed and installed in accordance with SCS engineering
criteria and WDNR regulations.
Installation of Monitoring Equipment
Station Gl (Fig. 10) will be constructed, instrumented
and maintained under a subcontracts! agreement with the USGS
Itwxii consist of: a. a concrete weir or flume and associated
embankments to control flow, b. a digital stage recorder
stripchart recorder, timer, and bubble-gage monometer to'
record flow, c. an automatic stage-activated water sampler to
take water and suspended sediment samples, and d. a 10x12x8 ft
heated, insulated building, provided with electrical power
for housing the electronic monitoring equipment.
The installation and maintenance of the remaining
stations will be subcontracted to Washington County.
33
-------
a Washington County employee, and the samples transported
for analysis to the laboratory services section of the WDNR.
Sample analysis will be subcontracted to WDNR after pick-
up, and prior to analysis, the samples will be maintamed at
Precipitation frequency, intensity, duration, and volume
will be monitored with recording rain gages placed at sev-
eral sites throughout the watersheds. Periodically, freshly
collected precipitation samples will also be sent to the
laboratory for analysis.
Parameters to be Measured
Stage recorders will provide quantified flow data;
samples of base flow and of runoff events will be analyzed
for a variety of parameters to determine the loading of
suspended sediment, the major dissolved salts, nutrients,
and organic carbon. On a seasonal basis the organic carbon
content and resultant oxygen demand of the runoff water will
be further quantified, and concentrations of pesticides and
heavy metals will be determined.
The concentrations of substances in runoff water result
from the many varied processes by which these materials are
transported across the sediment (or soil)-water interface.
By coordinating the project's efforts with those of investi-
gators in other disciplines at the University of Wisconsin,
attempts will be made to quantify these processes. To tins
end, samples of watershed soils and streambed sediments will
be taken and characterized in the laboratory.
Periodically, precipitation samples will also be analyzed
for nutrients, organic carbon, pesticides, and heavy metals.
The specific analyses to be carried out on runoff water,
sediment, soil, and precipitation are detailed in Table 5.
35
-------
Table 5. Water quality parameters to be evaluated
Frequency of
Analyses
Unfiltered
Routinely Total solids
Total N
Analyses8
On water samples
Filtered1*
Dissolved solids
Dissolved NHi,-N
By Difference
Suspended solids
Organic Nc
Seasonally
Seasonally
Initial
characterization
of soils
and annual or
semi-annual
characterization
of strea.mbed
sediments
Total P
Total organic C
Chemical oxygen demand
Total pesticides8
Total heavy metalsh
Dissolved (N02+N03)-N
Dissolved N02-Nd
Dissolved reactive P
Dissolved organic C
Dissolved chlorides
Conductivity
Alkalinity
Dissolved Ca.Mg, JJa, K
Dissolved SO^-S
Dissolved N02-Nf
Dissolved pesticides2
Particulate Pe
Particulate pesticides8
Dissolved heavy netalsh Particulate heavy metalsh
Unfiltered
Total N
Total P
Total pesticides8
Total heavy metalsf
On precipitation samples
Filtered
Dissolved NHt,-N
Dissolved (N02+N03)-N
Dissolved reactive P
On soil and sediment samples
By difference
Organic Nc
Particulate Pe
Air Dried
Particle size distribution
Total N
Exchangeable NHi,-N
(N03+N02)-N
Available P
Organic matter
Cation exchange capacity
pH
Pesticides8
Heavy metals
scesan
Which Will be carried Lt by the Unl
filtered through No. i)2 Whatman.
Total N minus inorganic N forms.
stations monitoring drainage from livestock operations
*ho..
P.
Pb, Cd, Cu, Hg, Zn, Cr, B.
WlU be ""ermined by history of pesticide applications in the
36
-------
Methods of Analysis
As previously mentioned, sample analysis will be carried
out by WDNR. Laboratory analytical techniques will follow
the standardized procedure described in the U.S. EPA Analyt-
ical Methods Manual (9). These same procedures will be used
by WDNR in the analytical work for the 1JC Menomonee River
pilot watershed study. The adoption of standard techniques
will ensure data comparability between the two projects and
provide the greatest opportunity for integration of data on
a region-wide basis.
Data Analysis, Storage and Retrieval
The stream flow data will be subjected to statistical
analysis to develop flow duration curves and high and low
flow discharge frequency relationships, which will be corre-
lated with precipitation patterns.
From this information and the concentrations of various
constituents in the water, calculations will be made of the
loading rates of sediment, nutrients, etc., per unit of water-
shed area, as a function of precipitation and stream flow
characteristics. These relationships will be evaluated and
compared for runoff from treated and untreated watersheds.
Coordination of data processing will be provided by the WDNR.
In order to be compatible with related Basin studies, all
data from the project will be formatted in compliance with
EPA guidelines and will be submitted on a regular basis to
the EPA STORET system, in the Decimal Input (DIP) format.
Tape or disk files will provide security backup for preven-
tion of accidental data destruction and will be available for
in-house data analysis and simulation.
In addition to raw data files, it is envisioned that
summary files, subfiles of specific parts of the data and
other files as necessary for informational analysis will be
created as needed by project participants. Suitable forms
37
-------
of data reporting and computer analyzed output, including
tables and plots, will be supplied as needed to support
project objectives and will be available for project reports
38
-------
Bibliography
1 International Reference Group on Great Lakes Pollution
from Land Use Activity, November 1974. Prepared by
the U.S. Section of Task Group A for the Pollution
from Land Use Activities Reference Group of the
International Joint Commission.
2 Great Lakes Basin Framework Study. 1971. Land Use and
Management—Appendix 13. Great Lakes Basin Commission,
Ann Arbor, Mich. pp. 13-91. Draft copy.
3 Daniel, T. C. 1974. Watershed Selection—Agricultural
and Urbanizing Areas. Water Resources Center, Univ.
of Wisconsin-Madison, Wis. Mimeo Report.
4. Anonymous. 1969. Germantown, Wisconsin...Comprehensive
Plan. Tech-Search, Inc., Wilmette, 111. p. 16.
5. SEWRPC Land Use Transportation Study. 1966 (November).
SEWRPC, Waukesha, Wis. Vol. 3 (#6).
6 U.S. SCS Soil Survey—Washington County, Wisconsin.
'l971. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington,
D.C.
7 Holtan, H. N., N. E. Minshall and L. L. Harrold. 1962.
Field Manual for Research in Agricultural Hydrology.
Agriculture Handbook No. 224. Soil and Water
Conservation Research Division, USDA-ARS.
8. Reinhart, K. G. and R. S. Pierce. 1964. Stream-Gaging
Stations for Research on Small Watersheds. Agriculture
Handbook No. 268. USDA For. Serv.
9. National Environmental Research Center, Cincinnati.
1974. Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and
Wastes. U.S. EPA, Off. Tech. Trans., Washington,
D.C.
39
-------
2. DEVELOPMENT OF A PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT PROGRAM FOR
SEDIMENT CONTROL
This objective is concerned with the development of a
planning and management program for sediment control on a
county-wide basis under the guidance of appropriate state
and federal institutions. This will involve basically the
preparation of an array of alternatives for the consideration
of decision makers at appropriate levels of government cover-
ing such things as institutional mechanisms, legal frameworks,
regulatory approaches, and methodologies for implementation
developed by project personnel in working associations with
local leaders and staffs of state agencies and institutions.
At this time, the legal framework under which sediment
regulation might best operate is not defined. The problem
might be handled directly by county government with increased
professional support staff to provide technical backup and
with policy direction coming from the soil and water conser-
vation district supervisors whose membership can be broadened
to insure urban representation under Chapter 92, Wisconsin
Statutes, "Soil and Water Conservation District Law". It is
possible, however, that the best long-range mechanism for
sediment control might be one similar to Wisconsin's shore-
land-floodplain management program which was initiated by
the state and obliges each county to develop its own programs
within overall state guidelines. These two alternatives, as
well as other possibile approaches to the sediment control
problem, have pros and cons, and the objective of the project
will be to evaluate the several approaches from an economic,
governmental, legal, and technical standpoint in order to
arrive at a feasible process for resolving the sediment con-
trol problem.
Initially, a review and evaluation of the existing
statutory framework within the State of Wisconsin will be
undertaken. Questions to be analyzed include, "What
constraints, if any, exist at the state level to the develop-
ment of a county-wide regulatory mechanism?" and "What legal
-------
constraints, if any, exist at the county level to the devel-
opment of a regulatory mechanism which will cover both
incorporated and unincorporated areas?"
The examination will propose legal solutions to any
statutory problems that might exist and will outline the
legal framework necessary for establishing a regulatory
mechanism. Further, the work will examine existing govern-
mental organization, particularly county level government,
and suggest possible approaches to implementation.
A second review effort will be aimed at analyzing on-
going sediment control programs in other states and their
counties. Primary emphasis will be on those areas located
within the Basin although it may be necessary to review
experiences in other areas such as the states of Maryland,
Iowa and Fairfax County, Virginia. Representative programs
will be selected for detailed study. Legislative histories
of these programs will be reviewed, support and opposition
will be identified, and institutional conflicts encountered
during enactment will be analyzed.
These operative statutes and administrative regulations
will be examined to determine the breadth of their coverage
and the processes of implementation. Analyses of enforcement
powers granted regulatory agencies and inducements for accom-
plishing program objectives will also be made. The effective-
ness of the specific programs will be looked at in detail, and
their successes and failures documented.
It is also within the scope of this study to review,
in selected instances, sediment control proposals that
failed to be enacted into law. Again, interest groups, both
pro and con, should be identified and an effort made to deter-
mine why specific proposals were defeated.
An analysis of the possible impact of related state and
federal programs on the Washington County Project would also be
germane to this review. Examples of such programs are the
Coastal Zone Management Act (P.L. 92-583), the Federal Water
Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972 (P.L. 92-500), and
any federal land use planning legislation, if enacted.
41
-------
This study will be based on reviews of legislative
histories, interviews with key legislative staff people and
elected officials and with agency personnel charged with
administering sediment control programs, and on-site visits
to selected program areas.
A summary to be developed will take into consideration
the full array of alternatives that have been identified for
sediment control so that the policymakers to whom this
material is presented for action can make their decisions
based on their review of several feasible options. This
summary will include supporting legal documentation.
To aid policymakers in their deliberations, additional
background information on the social, political, and economic
implications of the proposed sediment control alternatives
must also be developed. Attitudes of local people toward
environmental problems in general and sediment pollution
problems specifically must be carefully examined. A thorough
analysis of the costs and benefits of various sediment control
alternatives will be made and a range of inducement possi-
bilities suggested.
Potentials for funding, both public and private, must be
evaluated. In this context, it is essential to review
existing cost sharing programs in rural areas to determine
their strong and weak points and their successes and failures.
Information gleaned from this review of regulatory programs
in other areas will also be of value in this effort.
It is anticipated that much of the previously described
background information will be assembled within the first
year of the project. Development of an effective planning
and management program for sediment control should be viewed
as a continuing problem-solving process involving project
personnel, state agency staff, decision makers, and local
citizens. To assist project personnel, a group of advisors,
consisting of officials of the town of Kewaskum, the Village
of Germantown, the Washington County Board, and the State Board
of Soil and Water Conservation Districts, will be utilized.
-------
The goal of this part of the project, therefore, will be
to provide those public officials responsible for establishing
a regulatory mechanism for sediment control with a series of
alternatives for dealing with sediment control problems and
with sufficient backup information on these alternatives to
assist them in selecting the most feasible approach to
solving their particular sediment control problem. Clearly,
the process involves continuous participation of project
personnel with citizens and decision makers. Time frames for
these activities are difficult to predict although decisxons
can and will be reached through coordinated efforts of all
involved parties.
-------
3. PERSONNEL, TECHNICAL AND FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS
This section of the report is concerned with identifying
resources at the local, state and regional level required to
implement the various alternatives developed as a result of
Objective 2 and necessitates close collaboration between
all participants involved. The importance of this component
cannot be overlooked, for in part it will determine the
economic acceptability of the different alternatives and
become increasingly more critical when the results of this
project are implemented on a regional basis. In general it
may be assumed that these resources will consist of personnel
and backup support. The amount or level of personnel
required at the local, state or regional level is less well-
known than the type of personnel required. Potential areas
of need might include legal, technical, clerical, administra-
tive, regulatory or enforcement, education and information
dissemination, and political. Not only is it necessary for
the project participants to define the level and types of
new personnel required, it is perhaps most important to
clearly define their roles and relationship to existing
personnel presently employed by such agencies as SCS, SEWRPC
UWEX, WDNR, and BSWCD. Identification of the resources
required must be evaluated closely so that coordination at
the local, state and regional level is insured. Obviously,
identification of these resources at this time is prematurl;
however, the methodology used in identifying these resources
can be described.
Development of the resource needs will be accomplished
by the project staff in collaboration with project
participants. This needs inventory, not only from a personnel
requirement but cost of program administration, will be
developed for each alternative identified and will include
needs at the local, state and regional level in Objective 2.
Information and input into this objective will be derived
from consultations, conferences, workshops, and educational
programs involving local, state and federal agencies,
-------
organizations, and interested citizens. Continuous review
and revision of this aspect will result as new information
is developed through activities directly associated with
this or closely related objectives.
-------
4. EDUCATION AND INFORMATION PROGRAM
The goal of the educational phases of the project Is to
have a diverse group of target audiences-local, state, multi-
state and national-be made aware of alternative solutions to
the sediment problem in rural and urbanizing areas. The
purpose is to have these audiences modify their attitudes
and behavior on a long-term basis so that sediment control
is substantially increased and sediment pollution of the
nation's waters is reduced.
Within this broad goal several specific operational
objectives become important.
°Increase public awareness and understanding
o± the problems caused by sediment in streams.
0Increase public awareness and understanding
of the full range of possible preventive
and corrective measures for solving these
problems.
0Improve public awareness among a wide variety
of individuals and groups of the purposes
progress and significant findings of the
Washington County Project.
°Provide opportunities through which various
segments of the public can observe results
of the project and project activities.
0Provide forums through which the public can
participate in formulating and reviewing
specific aspects of the project.
0Provide forums through which the public can
participate in implementing specific program
recommendations such as land use planning
and land use regulations.
0Provide educational materials which can
serve to transfer information and method-
ology to other appropriate geographic areas.
Level of Activity Needed
M. Frank Hersman, Director of the Office of Intergovern-
mental Science and Research Utilization, National Science
Foundation, has pointed out clearly the need for active
programs to disseminate new information from research and
-------
demonstration projects and has encouraged less reliance upon
the passive techniques of collecting, indexing and dissemi-
nating scientific and technical information upon the specific
request of a potential user. The educational phase of this
project is designed to be dynamic and active. Hersman has
also pointed out the pitifully small level of support for
educational phases of research and development projects. In
this connection a portion of the recent publication, "Technol-
ogy Transferring Utilization: Recommendations for Redirecting
the Emphasis and Correcting the Imbalance", by the National
Academy of Engineering is relevant.
"The federal government should not simply_tell you
all there is about promising technology; it should
concentrate instead on actually transforming tech-
nical information into ultimate uses that fulfill
public or private socio-economic needs. This will
likely require one billion dollars annually, not
the forty three million currently being spent."
The education and information phase of this project is
planned to be an active and practical multi-level program in
the sense described in the material quoted above.
General Description of Proposed Work
An active, client-centered, problem-oriented educational
program requires six major steps:
0Identification of target audiences or clientele
groups.
0Identification of needed learning experiences_
to bring about changes in attitudes and behavior
for each target audience.
0Planning of educational programs with selected
members of each target audience.
°Development of necessary educational materials
in a form comprehensible to the user.
°Systemative execution of the planned educational
program.
"Continual evaluation of the program.
A project such as the one in Washington County must
relate to a large number of target groups and clientele. A
preliminary listing of these is identified in Table 6.
-------
Table 6. Examples of target clientele and respective audience
groups
Target Clientele^
News media
Service Clubs
Voluntary organizations
concerned with environment,
natural resources, community
development, taxation, etc.
LOCAL (Within Washington County)
Committees of the Washington
County Board
00 Soil and Water Conservation
District Supervisors
00 Planning and Zoning Committee
00 Extension Education Committee
0 Town Boards
0 City and Village Councils
0 Schools - primary and
secondary
0 Others (to be selected)
Regional Planning Commission
Area Association of Soil and
Water Conservation Districts
Southeast District - Wisconsin
Association of Agriculture
and Extension Education
Committees, Inc.
Southeast Wisconsin Counties
County Boards in Southeastern
Wisconsin
Multi-county watershed
as sociations
District office of Wisconsin
Department of Natural Resources
Region-wide voluntary
organizations
Federal and state agencies
dealing with natural resources
STATE
Wisconsin Agricultural and
Extension Education
Committees, Inc.
Wisconsin County Boards
Association
Wisconsin Association of
Conservation Districts
League of Women Voters of
Wisconsin
00 Department of Natural
Resources
00 Department of Local Affairs
and Development
00 Department of Administration
00 Department of Public
Instruction
Natural Resources
State Agencies
Council of
Wisconsin Environmental
Education Council
Federal agencies dealing with
natural resources
Statewide news media
SWC Districts
throughout the Great Lakes
Region
HULTI -STATE
Upper Mississippi Area of NACD
Federal and state agencies
in Great Lakes Basin
National Association of
Counties
National Association of
Conservation Districts
Federal agencies dealing with
natural resources
U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency
NATIONAL
US Department of Agriculture
00 So.il Conservation Service
00 Agricultural Stabilization
and Conservation Service
00 Farmers Home Administration
00 Federal Extension Service
US Department of the Interior
00 Geological Survey
00 Bureau of Sport Fisheries and
Wildlife
US Army Corps of Engineers
US Department of Health,
Education and Welfare
US Dept. of Housing and
Urban Development
INTERNATIONAL
International Joint Commission and related entitle
For full definition of abbreviations see Table 1 (page 2).
48
-------
Most of these groups will require a unique educational
program in order to achieve the goals and objectives. There-
fore, one operational education plan cannot be written—now
or in the future. Instead, a series of plans must be pre-
pared as the project proceeds with the people in the target
clientele group as definitive participants in the development
of the program.
The process for this is transferable. It is demonstrated
in Table 7, using the county boards as an example, how this
methodology of education and information dissemination can be
expanded from a local target audience through the national
level. The educational needs for each audience or client
group would be developed jointly in a practical manner.
Following this, the activities and events, such as tours,
briefings, meetings, and mass media presentations, would be
developed and presented in sequences appropriate to the
teaching objectives previously identified. Evaluation--
both formal and informal--would be carried on throughout.
Table 7 also lists the approximate duration of each activity
or event as well as the responsibilities to be assumed. A
similar kind of planning and scheduling format will be devel-
oped for each target client or audience group (or for
appropriate closely related groups) such as those listed in
Table 6. The education and information work unit of the
project will develop overall plans and work with staff of the
project and cooperating agencies to ensure completion.
This active, analytical and systemized approach to adult
education is one which has high potential for producing
behavioral changes among individuals and groups needed to
more adequately control sediment pollution of not only streams
in Washington County but throughout the state, Basin and
nation.
-------
Table 7 Example of a Teaching and Activity Outline
Ul
o
Audience or client group
o Washington County Board
Committees
oo SWCD
00 Planning
oo Ext. Education
0 County Board
° Wisconsin County
Boards Association
o National Association
of Counties
o National Association
of Conservation
Districts
Local coordinator is res
Needs for
education
o Understand Project
o Advise 6 Counsel in
project development
o Consider facts on
policies S issues
and their
consequences
o Become generally
familiar with
proj ect
o Understand impli-
cations of project
for state
o Become familiar
with the impli-
cations of the
Washington
County Project
for nationwide
uses by counties
and states
o Become familiar
with sources of
factual information
£ teaching aids
;DOnsible for wnrkina T,TI
Teaching objectives
o Acquaint County
Board Members
with project
o Allow Board to
advise on pro-
ject develop-
ment
o Give facts on
project find-
ings in terms
of alternate
policies £
their conse-
quences
o Acquaint key
county board
members
(statewide)
with project
o In-depth
education for
key committees
of Wisconsin
County Boards
Association
o Desserninate
project
findings
throughout
the nation
o Promote
nationwide
action of
local govern-
ments on sedi-
ment control
th 1 f>=tr\
Activities £ events
Time or
Type and scope duration
0 Tours, briefings, and o Throughout
reports to committees project
o Advisors Committee o Throughout
meetings project
o "Public policy" o 1976
meetings for com- 1977
mittees £ entire
county board
o Articles ° 1976
o Presentations at
state meetings
o Tours
° Television
o Movies
o One or more con- o Late
ferences £ work- 1976
shops on policy 1977
issues £ conse-
quences .
o Presentations at o 1977
national meetings, 1978
publications in
national magazines,
use of films, TV
shorts, slides, etc.
o Conferences 6 work-
shops for in-depth
consideration of
project findings
Responsibility
Lead Cooperators
o County Ext. 0 A11 agen_
staff cies
o Local o County
Coordl- Extension
natora SEWRPC
o County SCS
Ext. o Total
Staff project
staff £
contrac-
tors
o Project o UWEX
Director BSWCD staff
SCS
o Project o UWEX
Director BSWCD staff
o Project o UWEX
Director o Extension
Service
US DA
o EPA
o NACD
o SCS
agencies to set priorities and general program thrusts.
-------
Detailed Operations
Even though a large number of audience groups are
identified in Table 6 and detailed plans for working with
each have not been worked out, some general directions are
clear. An active program of information and education for
landowners in the selected watersheds is underway, and educa-
tion efforts via mass media are ongoing throughout Washington
County. On the basis of these and previous experiences the
project needs would be developed as follows:
°A series of bulletins, pamphlets and brochures
on various institutional and technical phases
of the project for local, state and national
usage.
0 Slide-tape and television series showing tech-
nical and institutional phases of project
results and activities as an aid to widespread
dissemination of project findings.
°A sound, color, 16mm motion picture (suitable
for use throughout the Basin and for television
viewing) demonstrating the significance of
this and similar projects to improve water
quality in the Great Lakes.
°Workshops and educational conferences on
significant project activities and findings.
5. APPLICATION OF RESULTS TO OTHER AREAS
The development of a sediment control management plan
for Washington County will serve as a demonstration of
technical and institutional mechanisms for conducting a
county-wide, rural-urban program. The demonstration must,
however, achieve the goal of being implementable on a much
broader geographic scale, i.e., statewide, Great Lakes
region or national. It is fully understood that this
demonstration can only serve as a basic prototype since other
areas will have to develop programs taking into account
political, legal and economic constraints placed upon them.
The important role that project personnel can play in
disseminating information on the Washington County Project
51
-------
has already been alluded to in the description of the
education program. Workshops oriented to very practical
considerations of such a program could be developed and
presented in appropriate locations after the clientele
needing and using the information have been identified.
The practical types of workshops would include discussions
of the technical and institutional mechanisms attempted
with evaluations of those processes that led to successful
implementation and those processes that did not. In cases
where information has been obtained relating to institutional
arrangements in other states, these would be highlighted in
relationship to the success or failure that such arrangements
might have encountered in Washington County. Field demonstra-
tions would be made an important aspect of the workshops.
At the national level, attempts would be made to hold a
symposium on erosion control methodologies (technical and
institutional) concomitant with the annual meeting of the
Soil Science Society of America in 1979.
In line with the role of the Water Resources Center in
disseminating information through the office of Water
Research and Technology network and the role of NACD in
providing information to states on a regional basis,
audiences for sediment control information will be carefully
defined and the information packaged in a form that is
comprehensible to the particular audience identified.
Information is frequently packaged in forms that are so
technical as to be unintelligible to the recipient, and a
particular effort will be made in the Washington County
program to avoid these pitfalls.
52
-------
E. TIME FRAME AND CONTRACTURAL ARRANGEMENTS
Individuals representing agencies, organizations and
interest groups have been identified and incorporated into
work units directed toward accomplishing specific objectives.
Contractual arrangements are identified for accomplishing
certain functions required of the program (Fig. 15). Careful
planning and coordination of activities have been demonstrated,
and Fig. 16 provides a broad time sequence through which the
project will operate.
53
-------
Monitoring
Land treatment:
implementation of
conservation measures
Development of
regulatory mechanisms
and institutional
arrangements for
implementation
Education and
information program
Installation and maintenance of one
monitoring station
Installation of 13 monitoring stations--
design, maintenance, and supervision of
installation provided by project staff
Analysis of water and precipitation
samples, except for pesticides and
heavy metals
Characterization of soils and sediments
and all pesticide and heavy metal
analyses
Design, supervision, and implementation
of identified conservation practices,
through a coordinated effort between
WCSWCD, USDA-SCS, Village of Germantown.
and SEWRPC
Study of background information, and
development and required revision of
regulatory mechanisms and institutional
arrangements for implementation, in
cooperation with appropriate UW
departments, SEWRPC, and project staff
Increase public awareness and
understanding of sediment problems, the
range of preventive and corrective
measures, and the significance of this
project
By Wisconsin statutes, UW administers and provides staff for BSWCD.
Figure 15 Contractual Arrangements
54
-------
Ul
Ln
ACTIVITY
Conceptualize project
Initial contact with cooperating agencies
rtrite initial proposal
Define relationships with cooperating agencies
Develope and write work plan
DEMONSTRATION OF WATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENT
Select watersheds __
Select water quality parameters*
Select monitoring sites'
Select land treatments
Modify drainageways in urbanizing watershed
Install monitoring sites
Collect and analyse samples
Implement land treatments in urbanizing watershed
Implement land treatments in agricultural watershed
nFVFIOPMENT OF SEDIMENT CONTROL ORDINANCE OR OTHER REGULATORY MECHANISMS
Evaluate existing statutory authority in Wisconsin
Review experiences in other states
Study social and economic implications of regulatory programs
Draft new regulatory program and/or ammendments to existing legislation
Review program with local decision makers ^_
Public review process
STUDY OF INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS FOR LEGISLATION IMPLEMENTATION
Evaluate alternative mechanisms for program development
Evaluate personnel requirements for implementation
Evaluate financial requirements for implementation
EDUCATION AND INFORMATION DISSEMINATION PROGRAM
Define audiences
Package and disseminate information
ASSESSMENT OF PROGRAM APPLICABILITY ON REGIONWIDE BASIS
SUPPLEMENTAL ACTIVITIES
Computer storage of data
Data evaluation
Transfer of data to STORET ^
Interim reports .
Final report
1973
"? 3
linn
nun
" 1974
4 1
^-
in
1975
1 1
III
II
1 Illl
1 III
III
Illl
III
II,
II,
Illl
ri
1976 1977
1 III!
i nil
1 Illl
ii in
ii in
nun
ii HI
i ii
2341234
II 1
II II II II 1 1 II II
II
Illl
III
Illl III II II II II
III III II Illl II 1 1
Illl III Illl II II 1
1 1 Illl 1 II
1111 ill ill ill mum i
III 1 1 III IN 1 I
in in HI in
iiiniii in minium i
-Ff f^\
in 'mi in mi in in i
ii ii ii ii ii n i
1978 1979
~n in mini
n n ii i n n
n n i n n i i
11 i ii
m m mi inn
miiiii n mi
iniinii in
calender year
quarter
c actually part of planning phase
d continuous, as land is disturbed
e continuous process of review and modification
FIG. 15. Time schedule of activities.
-------
F. SUMMARY
The Washington County (Wisconsin) Project has been
designed to conduct a reasearch-demonstration program dealing
with the control of diffuse sources of pollution to surface
waters. The program will demonstrate new and existing
effective land treatment measures designed to control ero-
sional and runoff losses from rural and urban lands. The
demonstration includes a monitoring program to evaluate the
effectiveness of land treatment measures in improving the
water quality of the receiving streams.
Of major importance is the necessity for developing a
county-wide management plan for the control of sediment in
urban and rural settings in an integrated manner, and this is
best approached by developing alternative schemes which are
thoroughly evaluated from the standpoint of the social, legal,
economic, and political ramifications each alternative may
hold. This can only be done wisely and effectively if the
local public and particularly their representatives are
involved in the process from the outset and on a continuing
basis. Strong local support has been developed during the
conceptualization of the project, and the willingness with
which agency personnel and government representatives and
officials have given of their time and effort to meet the
program needs has been particularly gratifying. Clearly to
be an effective program, the economic feasibility of its
implementation is of primary concern. In this regard, each
alternative will be evaluated in terms of the personnel
needs and financial obligation that will be incurred in its
implementation, and only the economically feasible alternatives
will be recommended as viable management schemes.
The project involves an educational program designed to
provide information to the public and governmental officials
with material packaged in a form that is comprehensible to
the particular clientele group under consideration. The
education program will be pursued vigorously in Washington
56
-------
County from the outset of the project to keep a continuous
connection and stream of information flowing to the public
and their representatives in local government. As information
on the project is gathered, the flow of information and educa-
tional materials must be expanded to inform statewide and
eventually Great Lakes region and national audiences. For
the Washington County Project to be completely successful, the
management methodologies proposed must be implementable on
a much broader geographic base.
57
-------
G. BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION
Following are summaries of biographical information on
the principal investigator and those persons designated as
leaders of the various work units.
58
-------
Name: T. C. Daniel
Title: Assistant Professor-Soil Science; Technical
Coordinator, Washington County Project
Education:
Degree University Date Awarded
B.S. Texas A £ M University 1963
M.S. University of Wisconsin 1966
Ph.D. University of Wisconsin 1972
Postdoc. University of Wisconsin 1972
Professional and/or Research Experience:
Teacher, Soil Science and Chemistry, School
of Agriculture, Ibadan, Nigera. _ 1966-68
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Soil Science,
University of Wisconsin. 1972--
Selected Publications:
Daniel, T. C. 1969. Soils of Western Nigeria, In
Introductory Soils by D. Schmidt. Odutola Printing
Works Ekotedo, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Graetz, D. A., G. Chesters, T. C. Daniel, L. W.
Newland, and G. B. Lee. 1970. Parathion degradation
in lake sediments. J. Water Poll. Control. Fed.
42:R76-R94.
Daniel, T. C., and G. Chesters. 1971. Design and
construction of a shallow water sediment core
sampler. Environ. Letters 1:225-228.
Simsiman, G. V., G. Chesters, and T. C. Daniel. 1972.
Chemical control of aquatic weeds and its effect on
the nutrient and redox status of water and sediment.
15th Conf. I.A.G.L.R. University of Wisconsin,
Madison, Wis.
Chesters, G., H. B. Pionke, and T. C. Daniel. _ 1974.
Sampling of soil, water and sediment for pesticide
analysis, In W. D. Guenzi, ed., Pesticides and
Their Effect on Soil and Water. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer.,
Madison, Wis.
Daniel, T. C., and J. Bouma. 1974. Column studies of
soil clogging in slowly permeable soils as a function
of effluent quality. J. of Env. Quality. 4:321-326.
59
-------
Daniel, T. C., S. Nichols, and W. Clark. 1974.
Controlling waterweeds. University of Wisconsin-
Extension, Madison, Wis.
60
-------
Name:
Title:
Gordon Chesters
Director, Water Resources Center: Professor-
Soil Science, University of Wisconsin;
Chairman-Water Chemistry Program
Education:
Degree
B.S.
M.S.
Ph.D.
University
University of Wales, G.B.
University of Wisconsin
University of Wisconsin
Professional and/or Research Experience
Research Assistant, Dept. of Soil Science,
University of Wisconsin.
Postdoctoral Fellow, Dept._of Soil Science,
University of Wisconsin.
Assistant Professor, Dept. _of Soil Science,
University of Wisconsin.
Associate Professor, Dept._of Soil Science,
University of Wisconsin.
Professor, Dept. of Soil Science, Univer-
sity of Wisconsin.
Chairman, Dept. of Soil Science, Univer-
sity of Wisconsin.
Chairman, Water Chemistry Program,
Advisory Committee, University
of Wisconsin.
Director, Wisconsin Water Resources_
Center. University of Wisconsin.
Chairman, Water Chemistry Program,
Executive Committee, University
of Wisconsin.
Selected Publications: (Total 100)
Date Awareded
1954
1956
1959
1954-59
1959-61
1961-64
1964-67
1967--
1971-73
1972-73
1972 —
1973--
Konrad, J. G., G. Chesters, and D. R. Keeney. 1970
Determination of organic- and carbonate-carbon in
freshwater lake sediments by a microcombustion
procedure. J. Thermal Anal. 2:199-208.
Graetz, D. A., G. Chesters, T. C. Daniel, L. W. Newland,
and G. B. Lee. 1970. Parathion degradation in lake
sediments. J. Water Poll. Control Fed. 42:R76-R94.
Chesters, G., and J. G. Konrad. 1971._ Effects of
pesticide usage on water quality. Invitational
Symposium paper presented at the 1st National
Biological Congress, Nov. 1970, Detroit, Mich.,
BioScience 21:565-569.
61
-------
Chesters, G., J. G. Konrad, G. D. Schrag, and
L. Everett. 1971. Gas chromatography: Techniques
and_uses in soil, plant and water analysis
Invitational chapter In: ASA Special Publication,
Instrumental methods for analysis of soil and
plant tissue," pp. 129-183.
Pionke H B and G. Chesters. 1972. Sediment-
Water-Pesticide Interactions. J. Environ. Qual.,
Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 29-45.
62
-------
Name:
Title:
Education:
Degree
B.A.
M.A.
Ph.D.
Henry C. Hart
Professor-Political Science, University
of Wisconsin
University
Vanderbilt University
University of Wisconsin
University of Wisconsin
Professional and/or Research Experience:
Instructor, Dept. of Political Science,
University of Wisconsin.
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Political
Science, University of Wisconsin.
Associate Professor, Dept. of Political
Science, University of Wisconsin.
Professor, Dept. of Political Science,
University of Wisconsin.
Director, Indian Language and Area_
Center, University of Wisconsin.
Chairman, Dept. of Indian Studies,
University of Wisconsin.
Selected Publications:
Date Awarded
1936
1947
1950
1948-50
1950-55
1955-59
1959 —
1960-63
1966-69
Hart, H. C. ADMINISTRATIVE ASPECTS OF RIVER VALLEY
DEVELOPMENT. (Delhi: Indian Institute of Public
Administration, 1961).
Hart H C. "Valley Development and Valley Adminis-
tration in the Missouri Basin." PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
REVIEW, Vol. 41, pp. 1-11 (1948).
"Legislative Abdication in Regional
JOURNAL OF POLITICS, Vol. 13, pp. 393-
Hart H C.
Development."
417 (1951).
Hart, H. C. "Governing the Missouri." IOWA LAW REVIEW,
Vol. \1, pp. 198-215 (1956).
Hart H C "Crisis, Community and Consent in Water
Politics." LAW AND CONTEMPORARY PROBLEMS, Vol. 22,
pp. 510-537 (1957).
63
-------
Name:
Title:
Education:
Degree
B.A.
M.S.
Ph.D.
Frederick W. Madison, Jr.
Specialist, Department of Soil Science
University of Wisconsin '
University
University of Wisconsin
University of Wisconsin
University of Wisconsin
Professional and/or Research Experience:
Project Assistant, Federal Project #912
(Research on Prairie and Red Clay
Soils of Wisconsin).
Teaching Assistant, Kept, of Soil Science
University of Wisconsin.
Research Assistant, Soil Survey Division
of Wisconsin Geologic and Natural
History Survey.
Legislative Assistant to Senator Gaylord
Nelson.
Special Assistant to the Federal Co-chair-
man, _ Upper Great Lakes Regional
Commission.
Specialist, Dept. of Soil Science,
University of Wisconsin.
Date Awarded
1961
1963
1972
1961
1962-63
1962-64
1967-68
1969-73
1973 —
-------
Name: Patrick E. McGuire
Natural Resources Specialist
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
Education:
Degree University Date Awarded
B S. University of Wisconsin 1970
double M'.S. University of Wisconsin 1975
Professional and/or Research Experience:
Specialist, Dept. of Soil Science, 1a^n-l^
University of Wisconsin •*-*'"
Research Assistant, Dept. of Soil Science
University of Wisconsin _ xa/a
Natural Resources Specialist, Wisconsin
Department of Natural Resources ia/&
65
-------
Name :
Title:
Education:
Degree
Ph.B.
LL.B.
Carlisle P. Runge
Professor-Urban and Regional Planning,
University of Wisconsin
University
University of Wisconsin
University of Wisconsin
Professional and/or Research Experience:
Lake Superior Project participant.
Wisconsin Land Resources Committee
Staff.
University of Wisconsin Extension
• Specialist.
Project Manager United.Nations-
Yugoslavia Development Program
Professor,_Dept. of Urban and Regional
Planning, University of Wisconsin.
Selected Publications:
Date Awarded
1946
1948
1971-73
1972-73
1973
1973-74
1974--
Runge, C. P., and W. L. Church. New Directions in
Regionalism: A Case Study of Intergovernmental
Relations in Northwestern Wisconsin.
Runge, C. P. ed. Conclusions and Recommendations
for Strengthened State Planning and Management of
Wisconsin Lands.
Runge, C. P. A Proposal for Improving the Manage-
ment of the Great Lakes of the U.S. and Canada.
(Canada-United States University Seminar).
Clarenbach, F. A., H. C. Jordahl Jr., and C. P. Runge.
Maintaining Wisconsin: State/Regional/Local Planning
Arrangements for Land Development and Environmental
Protection.
66
-------
Name: Harold F. Ryan
Title: County Board Supervisor-Washington County
Education:
Hnivprsitv Date Awarded
Degree univerbJ-Ly __
B S. University of Wisconsin- 1953
Platteville
Professional and/or Research Experience:
District Conservationist, U.S.D.A. Soil 1944.73
Conservation Service.
Interim Coordinator, Washington County 1974__
Project.
County Board Supervisor, Washington 1974__
County.
67
-------
H. BUDGET
The estimated budgets for the project are presented on
the following pages:
Budget by Agency: Page Number
BSWCD 6g
UWEX 6 g
WRC 7Q
WDNR y Q
WCSWCD ?1
SEWRPC ?1
USGS
Summary of Budget for Project 72
68
-------
BUD3ET
BOARD OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICTS
Personnel
Fringe Benefits
Indirect Costs
Total
5/24/74
to
6/30/75
$ 36,745
6,614
20,577
$ 63,936
7/01/75
to
6/30/76
$ 32,504
5,851
18,202
$ 56,557
7/01/76
to
6/30/77
$ 34,130
6,143
19,113
$ 59,386
BUDGET
7/01/77
to
6/30/78
$ 35,836
6,450
20,068
$ 62,354
7/01/78
to
12/31/78
$ 18,813
3,386
10,535
$ 32,734
Total
$ 158,028
28,444
88,495
$ 274,967
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-EXTENSION
Personnel
Fringe Benefits
Indirect Costs
Supplies
Travel
Equipment
Oth
Total
5/24/74
to
6/30/75
$ 36,017
6,686
18,175
2,900
3,950
500
1,000
$ 69,228
7/01/75
to
6/30/76
$ 78,770
13,912
36,917
4,000
5,000
10,000
30,500
$179,099
7/01/76
to
6/30/77
$ 84,213
14,608
39,607
5,000
7,000
5,000
32,000
$187,428
7/01/77
to
6/30/78
$ 86,860
15,339
40,711
5,000
6,500
2,000
12,000
$168,410
7/01/78
to
12/31/78
$ 44,771
8,066
20,907
2,000
2,500
-
7,500
$ 85,744
Total
$ 330,631
53,611
156,317-
18,900
24,950
17,500
83,000
$ 689,909
69
-------
BUDGET
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN WATER RESOURCES CENTER
Personnel
Fringe Benefits
Indirect Costs
Supplies
Travel
Equipment
Other
Total
5/21/74
to
6/30/75
$ 57,906
8,652
36,689
3,300
2,000
2,000
6,500
$117,047
7/01/75
to
6/30/76
$191,462
22,251
no, 970
11,500
9,000
51,400
17,000
$413,583
7/01/76
to
6/30/77
$202,536
23,366
117,383
11,500
7,000
5,000
18,000
$384,785
BUDGET
7/01/77
to
6/30/78
$203,689
23,211
118,958
11,300
5,000
5,000
18,000
$385,158
7/01/78
to
12/31/78
$ 96,776
10,517
56,105
8,000
4,000
2,000
8,500
$185,898
Total
$ 752,369
87,997
440,105
45,600
27,000
65,400
68,000
$1,486,471
WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
Personnel
Fringe Benefits
Indirect Costs
Supplies
Travel
EquipiTient
Other
Total
5/24/74
to
6/30/75
$ 10,222
2,045
2,058
2,000
250
20,000
500
$ 37,075
7/01/75
to
6/30/76
$ 33,538
6,707
7,981
7,000
1,000
21,000
7,000
$ 84,226
7/01/76
to
6/30/77
$ 35,209
7,041
8,114
6,000
1,000
4,000
7,000
$ 68,364
7/01/77
to
6/30/78
$ 47,168
9,437
10,246
6,000
1,000
2,000
7,000
$ 82,851
7/01/78
to
12/31/78
$ 30,107
6,023
6,660
3,500
1,000
1,000
5,000
$ 53,290
Total
$ 156,244
31,253
35,059
24,500
4,250
48,000
26,500
$ 325,806
70
-------
BUDGET
WASHINGTON COUNTY SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Personnel
Fringe Benefits
Indirect Costs
Supplies
Travel
Equipment
Total
5/24/74
to
6/30/75
$ 2,580
591
345
200
400
58,200
25,000
$ 87,316
7/01/75
to
6/30/76
$ 16,232
3,716
2,173
1,000
1,200
300
247,000
$271,621
7/01/76
to
6/30/77
$ 17,046
3,904
2,282
1,000
1,200
300
60,000
$ 85,732
BUDGET
7/01/77
to
6/30/78
$ 17,896
4,096
2,396
1,000
1,200
100
25,000
$ 51,688
7/01/78
to
12/31/78
$ 9,393
2,149
1,258
200
600
100
_1S,000
$28,700
Total
$ 63,147
14,456
8,454
3,400
4,600
59,000
372,000
$ 525,057
SOUTHEASTERN WISCONSIN REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION
Personnel
Fringe Benefits
Indirect Costs
Supplies
Travel
Equipment
Total
5/24/74
to
6/30/75
$ 6,535
1,305
1,960
300
400
200
$ 10,700
7/01/75
to
6/30/76
$ 8,000
1,600
2,400
1,000
800
500
$ 14,300
7/01/76
to
6/30/77
$ 8,400
1,680
2,520
1,000
800
500
$ 14,900
7/01/77
to
6/30/78
$ 8,820
1,765
2,645
1,000
800
500
$ 15,530
7/01/78
to
12/31/78
$ 4,630
925
1,390
1,000
800
_
$ 8,745
Total
$ 36,385
7,275
10,915
4,300
3,600
1,700
$ 64,175
71
-------
BUDGET
U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
Supplies
Equipment
Other
BSWCD
UKEX
UW-WRC
WDNR
WCSWCD
SEWRPC
uses
5/2U/74
to
6/30/75
$ 500
8,000
9,500
Total $ 18,000
5/24/74
to
6/30/75
$ 63,936
69,228
117,047
37,075
87,316
10,700
18,000
Total $403,302
7/01/75
to
6/30/76
$ 1,000
7,000
$ 8,000
SUMMARY
7/01/75
to
6/30/76
$ 56,557
179,099
413,583
84,226
271,621
14,300
8,000
$1,027,386
7/01/76
to
6/30/77
$ 1,000
_
7,000
$ 8,000
7/01/77
to
6/30/78
$ 1,000
—
7,000
$ 8,000
7/01/78
"to
12/31/78
$ 500
—
3,500
$ 4,000
_ .
$ 4,000
8,000
34,000
$ 46,000
OF PROJECT BUDGET
7/01/76
to
6/30/77
$ 59,386
187,428
384,785
68,364
85,732
14,900
8,000
$808,595
7/01/77
to
6/30/78
$ 62,354
168,410
385,158
82,851
51,688
15,530
8,000
$773,991
7/01/78
to
12/31/78
$ 32,734
85,744
185,898
53,290
28,700
8,745
4,000
$399,111
Total
$ 274,967
689,909
1,486,471
325,806
525,057
64,175
46,000
$3,412,335
72
-------
1. REPORT NO
EPA-905/9-T7-001
TECHNICAL REPORT DATA .
(Please read Instructions on the reverse before completing/
' ^__ ._^———— I nr- r
Washington County Project"
4 TITLE AND SUBTITLE ,,«.^i.*—"O- ./ ^
Development and Implementation of a Sediment Control
Ordinance or other Regulatory Mechanism: Institutional
Arrangements Necessary for Implementation of Control
7.AUTHOR(S)Methology on Urban and Kural Lands.
Thomas C. Daniel
Ralph H. Klassy . coc • •
9 PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
Wisconsin Bd. of Soil & Water Conservation Districts
1815 University Avenue
Madison, Wisconsin 53706
. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION-NO.
. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NU.
2BA645
11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
G-005139
13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
Work Plan-May '7&-Ttec. '78
14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Great Lakes Coordinator
230 South Dearborn Street
Chicago, Illinois 60604
15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
Section 108 (a) Program - Ralph G. Christensen
U.S. EPA Project Officer - Ralph V. Nordstrom
16. ABSTRACT
The primary objective of this project is to demonstrate the effectiveness_of land
control measures in improving water quality, and to devise the necessary institu-
tional arrangements for the preparation, acceptance, adoption, and implementation
of a sediment control ordinance applicable to incorporated and unincorporated
areas on a county-wide basis.
17.
KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
DESCRIPTORS
.IDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDEDTERMS
c. COS AT I Field/Group
Sediment
Erosion
Water Quality
Institutional
Socio-Economic
Nutrients
Land Treatment
13. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
Document available from performing office
or NTIS, Springfield, Virginia 22151
cport)
21. NO. OF PAGES
20. SECURITY CLASS (This page)
22. PRICE
EPA Form 2220-1 (9-73)
73
GPO 814—949-3
-------