United States
        Environmental Protection
        Agency
Great Lakes
National Program Office
230 South Dearborn Street
Chicago, Illinois 60604
EPA-905/9-77-007-B
October, 1977
S-EPA
environmental impacf
       of  land use
    on wafer quality
                     Final Report on the
                     Black Creek Project
                      -Technical Report

-------
The following P.L. 92-500, Section 108(a) reports are available through
the National Technical Information Service (NTIS) U.S. Department of
Commerce, Springfield, Virginia  22161.   Prices listed for paper copy
and microfiche are prices given when placed on NTIS listing.

     ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF LAND USE ON WATER QUALITY
        A Work Plan                     EPA-G005103
        NTIS No. PB 227 112             Price:  Paper $5.50,  MF $2.25

     ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF LAND USE ON WATER QUALITY
        Operations Manual               EPA-905-74-002
        NTIS No. PB 235 526             Price:  Paper $9.25,  MF $2.25

     WATER QUALITY BASELINE ASSESSMENT FOR CLEVELAND AREA - LAKE ERIE
        Volume I - Synthesis            EPA-905-9-74-005
        NTIS No. PB 238 353             Price:  Paper $6.75,  MF $2.25

     WATER QUALITY BASELINE ASSESSMENT FOR CLEVELAND AREA - LAKE ERIE
        Volume II - Fishes              EPA-905/9-75-001
        NTIS No. PB 242 747             Price:  Paper $7.50,  MF $2.25

     ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF LAND USE ON WATER QUALITY
        Progress Report-1975            EPA-905/9-75-006
        NTIS No. PB 248 104             Price:  Paper $8.00,  MF $2.25

     NON-POINT SOURCE POLLUTION SEMINAR-NOVEMBER 1975
        NTIS: PB 250 970                EPA-905/9-75-007
        (266 pgs.)                      Price:  PC 9.00/MF 2.25

     IMPACT OF NON-POINT POLLUTION CONTROL ON WESTERN LAKE SUPERIOR
        Red Clay Project-Work Plan      EPA-905/9-76-002
        NTIS No. PB 255 293             Price:  PC 7.50/MF 3.00

     CONFERENCE ON MUSKEGON COUNTY, MICHIGAN WASTEWATER TREATMENT
     SYSTEM   -9/17-18/75               EPA-905/9-76-006
        NTIS No. PB 263 552/AS          Price:  PC A09/MF A01

     WASHINGTON COUNTY PROJECT
        Work Plan                       EPA 905/9-77-001 (Jan ?77)
        NTIS No. PB 264 189             Price:  PC A05/MF A01

     BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES FOR NON-POINT SOURCES POLLUTION CONTROL SEMINAR
        1976-Nov. 331 pgs.              EPA-905/9-76-005
        NTIS No. PB 265 731/owp         Price:  PC A15/MF A01

     ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF LAND USE ON WATER QUALITY
        Progress Report-1976            EPA-905/9-76-004
        NTIS No. PB                     Price:  PC   /MF

     ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF LAND USE ON WATER QUALITY-Summary Final  Report
        October 1977 95 pgs             EPA 905/9-77-.007-A
        NTIS No. PB 278 187/AS          PC A06/ MF A01

-------
                                                       C.'l-
October, 1977                                   EPA-905/9-77-007-B


           ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF
                     LAND USE ON
                   WATER QUALITY
                          Final Report
                           on the
                       Black Creek Project
                       (Technical Report)
                            by
                         James Lake
                       Project Director
                       James Morrison
                        Project Editor

                         Prepared for
                U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL
                PROTECTION AGENCY
                Great Lakes National Program Office
                    230 South Dearborn Street
                     Chicago, Illinois 60604
 Ralph G. Christensen                             Carl D. Wilson
 Section 108a Program                               Project Officer
                UNDER U.S. EPA GRANT NO. G005103
                             to
           ALLEN COUNTY  SOIL & WATER
              CONSERVATION DISTRICT
              U.S. Department of Agriculture, SCS, ARS
               Purdue University, University of Illinois

-------
                         DISCLAIMER
This project has been financed (in part) with Federal funds
from the Environmental Protection Agency under grant number
G-005103.  The contents do not necessarily reflect the views
and policies of the Environmental Protection Agency, nor does
mention of trade names or commercial products constitute
endorsement or recommendation for use.

-------
                        TABLE OF CONTENTS
                            SECTION I
                          Introduction

1 . 1      HISTORY ................................................. 1
1 . 2      PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS .................................... 3
1.2.1    Environmental Protection Agency ......................... 3
1.2.2    Allen County SWCD ....................................... 3
1.2.3    Soil Conservation Service ............................... 3
1.2.4    Purdue University ....................................... 3
1.2.5    University of Illinois .................................. 4
1.2.6    Additional Assistance ................................... 4
1 . 3      CONCEPT OF THE PROJECT .................................. 4
                            SECTION II
                           Conclusions

2.1      FECAL POLLUTION OF BLACK CREEK .......................... 8
2 . 2      TOXIC SUBSTANCES „ ....................................... 9
2.3      FISH [[[ 9
2.4      CONSERVATION PRACTICE INSTALLATION AND WATER QUALITY ____ 10
2 . 5      NUTRIENT AND SEDIMENT TRANSPORT ............. . ........... 1Q
2 . 6      STREAM CHANNEL STABILITY ................................ 12
2 . 7      SEDIMENT POND ........................................... 12
2.8      IN CHANNEL DESILTING BASIN .............................. 13
2 . 9      TILLAGE ................................................. 13
2 . 10     TILE DRAINAGE , . ......................................... 14
2.11     WATER QUALITY BASED ON GRAB SAMPLE DATA ................. 15
2 . 12     ALGAL BIOASSAY STUDY .................................... 16
2.13     LABORATORY INCUBATION STUDIES ........................... 16
2 . 14     RAINULATOR .............................................. 17
2 . 15     WATERSHED MODEL ......................................... 18
2 . 16     REMOTE DATA ACQUISITION ................................. 18
2 . 17     SOCIO-ECONOMIC CONCLUSIONS .............................. 18
2.18     LAND MANAGEMENT ......................................... 19
2 . 19     ADMINISTRATION .......................................... 20
                           SECTION III
                       Technical Approach

3 . 1      SELECTION OF BLACK CREEK ................................  21
3.1.1    Selection Criteria ......................................  21
3.1.2    Comparison of Area, Maumee Basin ........................  21
3.1.3    Land Capability Units ...................................  40
3 . 2      DESIGN OF LAND TREATMENT ................................  47
3.2.1    Role of SCS .............................................  47

-------
11
 3 . 3      TECHNICAL APPROACH	51
 3.3.1    Sampling	51
 3.3.2    Laboratory Analysis	66
 3.3.3    Data and Handling	76


                            SECTION IV
                           Study Results

 4 .1      SIMULATED RAINFALL	87
 4.1.1    Equipment	         87
 4.1.2    objectives	!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 87
 4.1.3    Summary of Results	I!.!!!".!!.*!!!!!! 89
 4 . 2      BANK STABILITY STUDIES	.'..'.'..'..'.'...'..'. 116
 4.3      SEDIMENT BASINS	!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 118
 4 . 4      MICROBIOLOGICAL STUDIES	120
 4.4.1    Bacterial Counts at Low Flow	'..'.... 12°
 4.4.2    Contamination at Low Flow	 121
 4.4.3    Bacterial Counts, Maumee, Wann Ditch	 125
 4.4.4    Bacterial Counts in Tile Drainage Water	126
 4.4.5    Fecal Coliform/Fecal Strep Ratios	 127
 4.4.6    Biochemical Oxygen Demand	 128
 4.4.7    Fish Kill Caused by Organic Pollution	'..'.'....'.'.'.'.'.. 129
 4.4.8    Pesticides and Heavy Metals	 130
 4 . 5      FISH STUDIES	 132
 4.5.1    Fish Sampling	!!!!! 132
 4.5.2    Habitat Structure	.'....'.'...'......'......'... 132
 4.5.3    Species Composition and Distributions	134
 4.5.4    Seasonal Changes in Fish Communities	137
 4.5.5    Habitat, Fish Community Diversity	 138
 4.5.6    Effects of Channel Modification	'.[[ 138
 4.5.7    Stream Disturbance and Fish Communities	 140
 4.6      TILE DRAINAGE	.'..'..'.. 142
 4.6.1    Initial Tile Sampling Program	 142
 4.6.2    Tile Monitoring Continued Program	 144
 4.6.3    Results of Automatic Tile Sampler	 145
 4.6.4    Pesticide and Herbicide Response	 148
 4.6.5    Stream Grab Sampling Program	 148
 4 . 7      TILLAGE STUDIES	.'........ 152
 4.7.1    Hoytville Silty Clay Loam	* [ 155
 4.7.2    Nappanee Silt Loam	 156
 4.7.3    Whitaker Loam	 157
 4.7.4    Morley Silt Loam	!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I58
 4.7.5    Haskins Loam	 159
 4.7.6    Chemicals Applied to Replicated Plots	 159
 4.7.7    Tillage Demonstrations	 160
 4 . 8      SOCIO-ECONOMIC STUDIES	 161
 4.8.1    Model:   Sociological	 162
 4.8.2    Model:   Economic	 165
 4.8.3    The Data Base	!!!!!!!!! i66
 4.8.4    Sociological Conclusion	 173
 4.8.5    Economic Conclusion	                         175

-------
                                                               Ill


4.8.6    Policy Implications	176
4 . 9      MODELING	177
4.9.1    ANSWERS	177
4.9.2    Tile Drainage Simulation Model	203
4 .10     STUDIES OF NUTRIENT AVAILABILITY	212
4.10.1   Effect of Incubation Temperature	212
4.10.2   Effect of Aeration Status and Shaking	213
4.10.3   Effect of Calcium Carbonate Addition	215
4.10.4   Addition of Soluble Inorganic Phosphorus	217
4.10.5   Addition of Soluble Inorganic Nitrogen	217
4.11     ALGAL STUDIES	221
4.11.1   Introduction	221
4.11.2   Materials and Methods	222
4.11.3   Results and Discussion	223
4 .11. 4   Conclusions	227
4 .12     STUDIES OF MAUMEE BASIN	229
4 .13     CONSTRUCTION, LAND USE DIFFERENCES	234


                            SECTION V
                           Discussion

5 .1      IMPACT OF LAND TREATMENT	237
5.1.1    Analysis of Costs	238
5.1.2    Arriving at BMP's	245
5.1.3    Engineering Observations	250
5.2      SOURCES OF SEDIMENT AND RELATED POLLUTANTS	252
5.2.1    Comparison of Subwatersheds	252
5 . 3      LOCAL VARIATIONS IN WATER QUALITY	272
5.3.1    Water Quality During a Drought	272
5.3.2    Effects of Channel Morphology	275
5.3.3    Variations in Water Quality	277
5.3.4    Effects of Construction Activities	279
5.3.5    Effects of Conservation Practices	279

-------
IV
                         LIST OF FIGURES
 Figure 1   Maume Basin Map . . ,	,	27
 Figure 2   Soil Associations  -  Maumee Basin  .  ,	,	28
 Figure 3   Black Creek Watershed 	,..,..,..,	34
 Figure 4   Location of Study  Area	,	35
 Figure 5   Soil Associations  -  Black Creek Watershed  ,	38
 Figure 6   Land Capability Units - Black Creek  Watershed  .  .  ,  42
 Figure 7   Purdue Monitoring  Sites 	,.49
 Figure 8   Illinois Monitoring  Sites ..,,,,,.„..,	,	58
 Figure 9   Automatic Pumping  Sampler	, ... 65
 Figure 10  Comparison   Suspended Solids .  ,,	73
 Figure 11  Comparison of Ammonium N .  .  .  ,	,  	74
 Figure 12  Comparison of Nitrate N	75
 Figure 13  Configuration of ALERT Hardware  ,,.,,.,	,	,.80
 Figure 14  Data Processing Scheme ,,,,,,,,,,„,.„	,,.,......86
 Figure 15  Flow Regimes in Watershed ,,,,.,,„.,,.,,.,	122
 Figure 16  Frequencies of Levels of Contamination	,..124
 Figure 17  Flow and Sediment  Hydrograph  for Automatic Tile
                Sampler .,..,,.,,.,	,,.,..,	,	,..147
 Figure 18 Nitrate Concentration vs Time  for Weekly  Grab
                Samples ,..,,.,,.,,.	, . . , 150
 Figure 19  Suspended Solids vs.  Stage ,	..,,..,	151
 Figure 20  Black Creek Sociological Model  , ,	, . . , , 164
 Figure 21  Surface and Subsurface Water  Movement Relationships  182
 Figure 22  Watershed Divided  into Elements with Channel
                Elements Shaded  . . ,	,..,,..	,	184
 Figure 23  Partitionin of Overland Flow	,	184
 Figure 24  Transport Relationships Used  in ANSWERS  Model  .,..,.191
 Figure 25  Sediment Loss 	,	,,.,,....,,	197
 Figure 26  Upper Black Creek  Watershed.  Local Net Sediment  Lossl99
 Figure 27  Effect of BMP
-------
                         LIST OF TABLES
Table 1   Land Capability Comparisons - Maumee Basin and Black
             Creek Study Area	23
Table 2   Land Use Comparisons - Maumee Basin and Black Creek
             Study Area	2J
Table 3   Soils Data By Land Capability - Black Creek Study
             Area	46
Table 4   Land Treatment Goals and Estimated Installation Costs..4**
Table 5   Degree of Difficulty for Black Creek Conservation
             Goals	50
Table 6   University of Illinois Analytic Methods	67
Table 7   Detection Limits (micrograms metal/ml water)	68
Table 8   Detection Limits in Micrograms Metal/Gram Dry Sediment.69
Table 9   Recovery of Compounds	71
Table 10  Erosion Losses	89
Table 11  Soil Loss As Aggregates	90
Table 12  Raindrop Energy vs. Surface Runoff	91
Table 13  Losses After Various Tillage Systems	91
Table 14  Losses After Various Tillage Systems	91
Table 15  Description of Experimental Conditions	93
Table 16  Nutrient Concentrations in Animal Wastes	94
Table 17  Amounts of Nutrients Added in Waste Applications
             to Three Experimental Sites	94
Table 18  Losses of Sediment and Nutrients in Runoff From
             Nappanee Soil	96
Table 19  Concentrations of Solids and Nutrients from Nappanee
             Soil	97
Table 20  Proportions of Added Nutrients in Swine Waste Lost
             in Surface Runoff	98
Table 21  Losses of Sediment and Nutrients From Morley Soil	99
Table 22  Concentrations of Solids and Nutrients From Morley
             Soil	100
Table 23  Proportions of Nutrients Added Lost in Surface
             Runoff From Morley Soil	101
Table 24  Losses of Sediment and Nutrient in Runoff From
             Overgrazed Pasture	102
Table 25  Concentrations of Solids and Nutrients From an
             Overgrazed Pasture	1°2
Table 26  Proportions of Added Nutrients Lost in Surface
             Runoff From an Overgrazed Pasture	1°3
Table 27  Characteristics of Soils Used in the Investigation	104
Table 28  Losses of Soil Phosphorus Components in Surface
             Runoff	1°5
Table 29  Losses of Nitrogen Components in Surface Runoff	1°6
Table 30  Percentage Distribution of Nitrogen and Phosphorus	1°8
Table 31  Percentage Nutrients	109
Table 32  Added Fertilizer Nitrogen and Phosphorus Lost in
             Runoff	HO
Table 33  Effect of Fertilization	HI
Table 34  Analysis of Soil Size Fraction	114

-------
VI
Table 35  Percent Sand and Sizes in Desilting Basin Deposits
             at Stations Listed	119
Table 36  Bacterial Counts From Surface Water Station 312,
             May 31, 1977	120
Table 37  Stream Discharge Class By Date for Two Sampling Sites..121
Table 38  Total Coliform, Fecal Coliform and Streptococcus
             Count - Low Discharge	121
Table 39  Surface Water Stations According to Stream Discharge
             and Organic Pollution	123
Table 40  Coliform Counts at High Stream Discharge	125
Table 41  Coliform Counts at High Stream Discharge	125
Table 42  Coliform Counts for 6 Septically Polluted and 14
             Non-septically Polluted Outlets	I27
Table 43  The Number of FC/FS Observed and Expected FC/FS
             Determinants	127
Table 44  BOD During Ascending Flow of Storm Event	128
Table 45  BOD and Ammonium N Concentrations During Fish Kill	I30
Table 46  Pesticide and Heavy Metal Concentrations	I30
Table 47  Summary of Pesticide and Heavy Metals Detected and
             Not Detected	151
Table 48  Categories for Habitat Analysis	i33
Table 49  Fish Species Collected in Black Creek	i35
Table 50  Fish Community Density During April	I38
Table 51  Percent Change - Number Species 4 Areas	141
Table 52  Summary of Initial Tile Sampling Program	142
Table 53  Concentration of Sediment and Nutrients in Tile
             Effluent	^43
Table 54  Sediment and Nutrient Concentrations by Ditch - 1974	i43
Table 55  Values for Exponential Fit - Tile Flow and Sediment-
             Nutrient Components	144
Table 56  Concentration of Sediment and Nutrients for 20 Tile
             Sites	145
Table 57  Sediment and Nutrient Losses from Tile Effluent -
             Automatic Sampling Site	145
Table 58  R-Squared Values for the Automatic Tile Sampling Site..146
Table 59  Concentration of Tile Effluent from Automatic
             Sampling Site by Year	148
Table 60  Prediction  of Loading From Complete Data Base	149
Table 61  Linear Correlation Results for Sites 2 and 6	154
Table 62  Exponential Correlation Results for Site 2 and 6	155
Table 63  Corn Response to Tillage System	155
Table 64  Soybean Response to Tillage System	156
Table 65  Corn Response to Tillage System	157
Table 66  Soybean Response to Tillage System	157
Table 67  Corn Response to Tillage System	158
Table 68  Soybean Response to Tillage System	158
Table 69  Corn and Soybean Response to Tillage System	158
Table 70  Corn Response to Tillage System	159
Table 71  Soybean Response to Tillage System	159
Table 72  Costs for Chemicals, Corn and Soybean	16°
Table 73  Corn Response to Tillage,  Roger Ehle Farm	160
Table 74  Chemicals Applied at Planting	161

-------
                                                              Vll
Table 75  Sociological Model Variables	
Table 76  Primary Tillage Practices	
Table 77  Computer Coefficients - 370 Acre Farm	
Table 78  Computer Coefficients - 580 Acre Farm	
Table 79  Average Annual Soil Loss Coefficient	
Table 80  Average Corn Yield and Moisture Coefficients	
Table 81  Average Soybean Yield	
Table 82  Production Costs	
Table 83  Net Revenue, Returns, Slopes Greater Than Two Percent..
Table 84  Interception Constants Recommended by Horton	
Table 85  Typical Surface Storage Coefficients	
Table 86  Sediment Particle Characteristics	
Table 87  Effect of Temperature on the Concentration of Soluble
             N and P	
Table 88  Effect of Aeration and Shaking on the Concentration
             of Soluble N and P	
Table 89  The Effect of Calcium Carbonate on the Level of
             Soluble N and P	
Table 90  Effect of SIP Addition on the Level of Soluble
             Phosphorus	
Table 91  Effect of Ammonium Nitrate Addition on the Concen-
             tration of Soluble N	
Table 92  Availability to Algae of Soluble Phosphorus in Stream
             Water	
Table 93  Variation of Available Soluble Phosphorus by
             Adjoining Land Use Characteristics	
Table 94  Proportion of Sediment Phosphorus Immobilized by Cells.
Table 95  Proportion of Sediment Inorganic Phosphorus Immobilized
Table 96  Proportion Immobilized by Cells Originating from
             Certain Extractable Fractions	
Table 97  Variation in Sediment Inorganic P Immobilized by
             Source of P	
Table 98  10-Year Annual Precipitation Sediment Yield and
             Discharge	
Table 99  Differing Parameters, Four Watersheds	
Table 100 Sediment Concentration Indexes - Subwatersheds	
Table 101 Cost by Practice	
Table 102 Technical Assistance Cost SCS	
Table 103 Cost of BMP Installation	
Table 104 Estimated BMPs Needed at Beginning of Black Creek
             Project	
Table 105 Projected Costs of Ideal Black Creek Land Treatment....
Table 106 Estimated Costs - Maumee Basin	
Table 107 Evaluation of Practices Applied in Black Creek Water-
             shed 	
Table 108 Characteristics of the Areas Studied	
Table 109 Rainfall and Runoff Amounts and Yields of Sediment
             and Nutrients	
Table 110 Nutrient Transport (kg/ha)	
Table 111 Percent of Nitrogen Forms Transported	
Table 112 Percent of Phosphorus Forms Transported..	
Table 113 Partitioning of Runoff, Transported Sediment and
             Nutrients - Smith-Fry Drain	
165
165
167
168
170
171
172
173
175
186
187
192

213

214

216

218

219

224

225
226
226

227

228

229
234
235
237
238
242

243
243
244

247
255

257
258
259
259

260

-------
 Vlll
Table 114 Partitioning of Runoff, Transported Sediment and
             Nutrients - Dreisbach Drain	260
Table 115 Smith-Fry Drain - Sediment and Nutrient Concentrations
             (1975)	261
Table 116 Smith-Fry Drain - Sediment and Nutrient Concentrations
             (1976)	262
Table 117 Dreisbach Drain - Sediment and Nutrient Concentrations
             (1975)	262
Table 118 Dreisbach Drain - Sediment and Nutrient Concentrations
             (1976)	262
Table 119 Sources of Runoff, Transported Sediment and Nutrients
             Smith-Fry Drain (1975)	265
Table 120 Sources of Runoff, Transported Sediment and Nutrients
             Smith-Fry Drain (1976)	265
Table 121 Sources of Runoff, Transported Sediment and Nutrients
             Dreisbach Drain (1975)	266
Table 122 Sources of Runoff, Transported Sediment and Nutrients
             Dreisbach Drain (1976)	266
Table 123 Yearly Concentrations, Transported Sediment &
             Nutrients - Smith-Fry Drain (75-76)	267
Table 124 Yearly Concentrations, Transported Sediment &
             Nutrients - Dreisbach Drain (75-76)	 267
Table 125 Yearly Concentrations of Total N and P Attached to
             Sediment (1975-76)	268
Table 126 Estimate of Annual Applied Fixed Nitrogen	269
Table 127 Estimate of Percent Applied and Fixed Nitrogen Lost.... 269
Table 128 Characteristics, Groundwater, Channel Flows, Black
             Creek	 273
Table 129 Stations with Water - Dreisbach Drain	 275
Table 130 Water Quality Characteristics - Manor Segments	 278

-------
 1.1 HISTORY

      The problem of nonpoint source pollution of the nation's  streams  and
 lakes  has  become a subject of increased attention because of the require-
 ments of Section 208 of Public Law  92-500  for  water  quality  management
 planning.

      Prior to the final passage of this act, the question of  "agricultural
 pollution"  had  been discussed in depth during a one-day conference on the
 Maumee River held in Fort Wayne, Ind.   in  early  January  of  1972.   This
 conference, sponsored by Rep. J. Edward Roush (Ind.-4),  provided one of the
 first public discussions  of  the  nonpoint  source  pollution  problem  in
 northeastern Indiana and the Maumee River Basin.

      As a result of the Maumee River Conference, local,  state  and  federal
 officials,  representatives  of  agricultural  and environmental protection
 groups, and other interested citizens  undertook a series of discussions  of
 the  problems of erosion and sediment  related pollution  of the Maumee River
 and ultimately Lake Erie.   These discussions were  arranged  by  the  Allen
 County  Surveyor,  William  Sweet,  and by then State Conservationist Thomas
 Evans of the Soil Conservation Service, USDA.

      As the result of these discussions, a proposal to study  the  problems
 of  agricultural  pollution  of the Maumee River was developed by the Allen
 County Soil and Water Conservation  District.

      The proposal called  for  the   cooperation  of  the  District,   Purdue
 University and SCS in a demonstration  project,  supported by research.   This
 proposal,  entitled "A Proposal for  the Reduction of  Sediment  and  Related
 Pollutants in the Maumee River and  Lake Erie,"  was submitted to Region Five
 of the Environmental  Protection Agency in June  of 1972.

      The proposal was assigned to the  Office  of  Great   Lakes  Coordinator
 where  funding  was  available under Section  15 of the water quality amend-
 ments of 1970.   Section 15 became Section 108(a)  with the adoption  of  the
 1972   amendments.   The Section 108 program,  administered from the Region V
 EPA office,  is a special program created by Congress to   demonstrate  means
 of improving water quality within the  Great Lakes Basin.   The act calls for
 federal participation of 75 percent of the  total  cost   for  demonstration
 projects.    Research   is funded under  the program in support of the  demons-
 tration effort.

      In October  of 1972, almost simultaneously  with the  adoption of  Public
 Law 92-500,  a six-month planning  grant was awarded  to the Allen County Soil
 and Water  Conservation District to  design,  in detail, the demonstration ef-
 fort  and related  research.

      This work was completed  and  is reported  in  Environmental   Impact  of
 Lan<3  Use on Water  Quality  -- A Work Plan.   Some of  the descriptive material
 about the  area chosen  for  the  study and  its relation  to   the  Maumee   Basin
 and to  Lake Erie  is reported  in this volume.

     This document constitutes the  final  technical  report on  the  five  years
of  effort,  beginning  with   the awarding of the planning grant  and ending
with  the close of  the project, Oct.  16, 1977.  It is one  of  four  volumes
designed to provide a complete description of the work accomplished and  the
                                                               INTRODUCTION

-------
results obtained during the course of the project.  Other volumes include a
non-technical  summary volume, a data volume in which information collected
during the project is summarized, and a volume made up of  papers  prepared
by individual researchers and administrators who worked on the project.

     Section 1.2 lists a large number of individuals and organizations  who
have been associated with the Black Creek project.  Some observations about
the success with which this diverse group has operated and the  ability  of
this project to relate to individual landowners within the project area are
in order.

     It is important to observe that the Black Creek project was  developed
by  interested persons in the local community and was not imposed from out-
side.  The specific sequence of events was as follows:

     (1)  A problem was identified by speakers  participating  in  an  open
     public meeting (the Maumee Conference).
     (2)  Interested governmental officials and private citizens  discussed
     the  problem  in a neutral forum.  At this point, there was no implied
     pressure to take any specific action, although a  realization  that  a
     problem  as  serious as this one had been described was likely to pro-
     duce governmental action was present.
     (3)  Funding to attack the problem was made available by EPA.
     (4)  A program satisfying diverse interests was proposed.
     (5)  Funding was made available for a  detailed  plan  for  a  program
     which  involved  local control through the sponsorship of the Soil and
     Water Conservation District.
     (6)  The program was funded and has been carried out.

     Particular attention was paid to the need for keeping the general pub-
lic and affected landowners involved in the project.  The Maumee Conference
was a public meeting.   Although discussions  at  the  Sweet-Evans  meetings
were not extensively covered in the local press, they were not closed meet-
ings, and all interested citizens were allowed to attend.

     The processes of proposal submission, revision, and  final  acceptance
was  reported  in  the press.  In addition, special meetings were held with
affected landowners, and contact was maintained by face-to-face  communica-
tion and by letter.

     As a result, rumors and hostilities that  could  have  developed  were
largely avoided.  At the close of the project, both environmental and agri-
cultural interests remained supportive of the concept and the project.

     Early in the conduct of the project, it was decided  to  hold  monthly
"steering  committee"  meetings  during  which  representatives of involved
agencies would be present.  These meetings included both administrative and
research personnel.  Minutes were prepared and distributed.  Discussion was
open and covered all aspects of the project.  As  a  result,  communication
among  researchers and communication between administrators and researchers
was excellent, and the project had a better focus than might otherwise have
been the case.
INTRODUCTION

-------
1.2 PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS

     The success of the Black Creek project has  depended  on  several  key
elements.   Most  important  has  been  the  coordination of the efforts of
diverse administrative and technical interests in the project.   Primarily,
agencies  involved included the Environmental Protection Agency, which pro-
vided  funding, the Allen County Soil and Water Conservation District, which
assumed  overall responsibility for the project, the Soil Conservation Ser-
vice of USDA, which provided technical assistance,  Purdue  University  and
the  University  of Illinois, which provided research support, and units of
local  and state government, which provided needed assistance.

     Key personnel from these agencies are listed in the following  discus-
sion:

1.2.1  Environmental Protection Agency

Ralph  Christensen, director Section 108 Programs, Great Lakes National Pro-
gram Office, Region V EPA.
Carl Wilson, project officer, nonpoint source coordinator, Planning Branch,
Region V EPA.

1.2.2  Allen County SWCD

Chairmen of the Board of Supervisors — Ellis MacFadden, Roger Ehle.
Members of the Board of Supervisors — Ellis  MacFadden,  Roger  Ehle,  Mic
Lomont, Eric Kuhne, John Hilger, Ray Arnold, Gilbert Whitsel.
Assistant Supervisor — Don Rekeweg.
Employees of the Board of Supervisors:
James  Lake — project director
Dan Dudley — aquatic biologist
Rex Journay — tillage research
John Pidlisny — technician
Alan Shupe — technician

1.2.3  Soil Conservation Service

Dan McCain — District Conservationist
John Dennison — area technician
C. F.  Polland — area engineer
Planners and technicians — Greg Woods, Gary Carlile,  Doene  Goettl,  Bill
Howard, Stan Steury, Darrell Brown.
Area Conservationists — Joe Branco, Ken Pyle
State  Office Personnel — Leon Kimberlin, Eugene Pope, Max Evans, Roy  Ham-
ilton, Robert Bollman.
State  Conservationists — Thomas Evans, Cletus Gillman, Buell Ferguson.

1.2.4  Purdue University

Rolland Z. Wheaton, project coordinator, studies of channel  stability  and
the effectiveness of sediment basins
Richard E. Land, field coordinator
Jerry V. Mannering, simulated rainfall research
Don Griffith, tillage trials
Harry Galloway, tillage trials
Darrell Nelson, chemistry
                                                               INTRODUCTION

-------
 Dr.  Lee Sommer,  chemistry
 Edwin J.  Monke,  data handling  and modeling
 Larry F.  Huggins, watershed  simulation  and data  acquisition
 Jack Burney, watershed modelling
 Stephen Mahler,  data acquisition
 Ralph Brooks,  socio-economic studies
 William Miller,  socio-economic studies
 William McCafferty,  aquatic  biology
 Jerry Hamelink,  aquatic biology
 James B.  Morrison, project editor and technical  writer
 Dagmar Clever, editorial  assistant
 Graduate  Instructors — David  Beasley,  Adelbert  Bottcher
 Administrative Personnel  —  Howard Diesslin, Director  Indiana  Cooperative
 Extension Service;   Bernard  J.  Liska, Director of the Indiana Experiment
 Station;  Ellsworth Christmas,  Assistant Director of  Cooperative  Extension
 Service;  Gerry Isaacs, head, Department of Agricultural Engineering; Marvin
 Phillips, head,  Department of  Agronomy; Paul Farris,  head,  Department  of
 Agricultural Economics.

 1.2.5 University of  Illinois

 James Karr, aquatic  biology  and water quality
 Illinois  Natural History  Survey Laboratory, sample analysis

 1.2.6 Additional Assistance

 William Sweet, Allen County  Surveyor
 William Jones, Allen County  Highway Department
 Elias Saamon, Northeastern Indiana Regional Coordinating Council
 Ernest Lesiuk, Allen County  Cooperative Extension Agent
 Fort  Wayne-Allen County Board of Health
 Allen County Data Processing
 Allen County Commissioners
 Allen County Council
 Agricultural Research Service, USDA, C.B. Johnson, technician


 1.3 CONCEPT OF THE PROJECT

      The Black Creek  project has been misinterpreted by some  observers  as
 an attempt to have a direct, measurable impact on water quality in the Mau-
mee River and Lake Erie.   This goal, while a worthy one, has never been the
 aim   of   the Black Creek project.  In fact, it is doubtful that any measur-
 able  impact on water quality in the river and the lake could be obtained if
 all of  the runoff water from the 12,038-acre Black Creek area were diverted
 from  the system.

      Instead, the basic concept of the Black Creek project has  been  as  a
model.   In  fact, the Black Creek Watershed is similar to 200 to 300 agri-
cultural watersheds  in the Maumee Basin.  The  question  has  been  whether
 techniques  demonstrated  in  this  watershed,  if  applied on a basin-wide
basis, would likely  improve  the quality of water in the  Maumee  River  and
Lake Erie.

     There have been  two  major  thrusts  simultaneously  underway  in  the
watershed.   The  first has been the demonstration effort itself, a project


INTRODUCTION

-------
designed to demonstrate the effectiveness  of  traditional  and   innovative
soil  and  water  conservation techniques for improving water quality.  The
second has been the research effort, directed at understanding the  mechan-
isms whereby the demonstrated techniques succeed or fail.

     Initial project goals stated that it was desirable to know if  a  con-
centrated  application  of existing methods of land treatment in  the Maumee
Basin could achieve a desired reduction in sediment.  It was  also  desired
to estimate how much such a program would cost on a basin-wide basis.

     Concurrently, the project was designed to discover what kind of  pro-
gram  might be carried out on a basin-wide basis which would convince indi-
vidual landowners to apply conservation practices for  the  improvement  of
water  quality.   Specifically, it was asked whether this can be  adequately
done on an incentive basis or whether some type  of  mandatory  control  of
pollution  from  nonpoint sources might be imposed with a reasonable chance
of success.

     The purpose of the research conducted in conjunction with the  demons-
tration  project  was  to  more fully understand the mechanisms whereby the
demonstration project could reduce the sediment load  entering  the  Maumee
River  and  to utilize this understanding to project to the Maumee Basin an
accurate estimate of methods that can be employed to achieve a desired  im-
provement in water quality and the costs of doing so.

     Robert Schneider, EPA Great Lakes  Coordinator  summarized   EPA's  in-
terest  in the Black Creek Project in light of additional developments over
the past five years, in a meeting at Fort Wayne, Ind. Oct. 26,  1977.   His
remarks included the following observations:

     "When the Environmental Protection Agency first authorized the project
back  in  May  of  1973,  the  Agency was seeking guidance for the nonpoint
source pollution control program specifically as it relates to water quali-
ty.  Under the provisions of the Federal Water Pollution Control  Act Amend-
ments of 1972 (Public Law 92-500), the United States Environmental  Protec-
tion  Agency  was  given  the  primary  responsibility for carrying out the
Federal role in water pollution control under  section  208  of   this  Act.
Nonpoint  source pollution control requires the development and implementa-
tion of area-wide waste treatment management plans that include  procedures
to reduce pollution from nonpoint sources.

     "We are acutely aware that this requirement introduces a new aspect to
our  nation's  pollution  control efforts.  Historically, pollution control
efforts have concentrated on collection and treatment of  wastes  that  are
discharged from point sources.  Nonpoint sources of pollution are not amen-
able to traditional methods of collection and treatment.  Thus the approach
recommended  is  prevention  of pollution before it occurs, EPA has gone on
record as advocating "Best Management Practices." The Black  Creek  Project
has the opportunity to answer this challenge.

     "What was not anticipated, as the Black Creek Project progressed,  was
a  General Accounting Office report on Agricultural programs.   I would like
to quote part of this report to you:
                                                               INTRODUCTION

-------
     xlf the United States is to continue to meet its own  food  needs
     and help alleviate world food shortages, it must maintain its top
     soil.  Estimates of soil losses for 283 farms GAO  visited  on  a
     random   basis  in  the  Great  Plains  Corn  Belt,  and  Pacific
     Northwest, indicate that topsoil losses are threatening continued
     crop productivity.

     "Soil scientists estimate that annual soil losses must be limited
     to  no  more  than  5 tons per acre in deep soils and one ton per
     acre in shallow soils to maintain soil fertility and productivity
     over  time.    According to Department of Agriculture technicians,
     about 84 percent of the 283 farms were losing over five tons  per
     acre  per  year on cropland for which calculations were made.  In
     addition, soil erosion was creating water and air  pollution  and
     highway maintenance problems.

     "Agriculture's Soil Conservation Service and Agricultural Stabil-
     ization and Conservation Service administers technical and finan-
     cial assistance programs — costing several hundred million  dol-
     lars  annually  —  designed  to help farmers control erosion and
     preserve topsoil.

     NThese programs have not been as effective as they  could  be  in
     establishing  enduring  soil  conservation practices and reducing
     erosion to tolerable levels.'
     "We in Environmental Protection Agency hope the  Black  Creek  Project
results  will  help  to resolve the issues in the General Accounting Office
report to Congress.  To this end, let me state some of the major EPA expec-
tations from the Black Creek Project:

          "1.  That the study will develop NBest Management Practices.1

          "2.  That from a given set of practices, a specific level of  wa-
          ter quality can be expected.

          "3.  That a model institutional mechanism to implement a nonpoint
          source program will be developed.

          "4.  That successful projects will be clearly identified and that
          the ones that have failed will be similarly identified.

          "5.  That economic data will be  developed  that  evaluates  best
          management practices in reference to water quality.

          "6.  That the social impacts from the study will be clearly iden-
          tified.

          "7.  That best management practices will be developed  so  as  to
          have a beneficial effect on the biological system of a stream.

          "8.  That guidelines for cost sharing will be developed.
INTRODUCTION

-------
     "These, then, are the highlights of EPA's expectations from this  pro-
ject.  I suggest that in the discussions over these two days,  you give con-
siderations to these expectations, and any others you believe  merit  atten-
tion."
                                References
    1.   Environmental Impact of Land Use on Water Quality — A Work  Plan;
    EPA Region V, 1973.

    2.  General Accounting Office, To Protect Tomorrow's Food Supply,   Soil
    Conservation Needs Priority Attention; 1977.

    3.  Schneider, Robert, "EPA Expectations of Black Creek"  speech,   Fort
    Wayne, Indiana, 1977.
                                                                CONCLUSIONS

-------
                           II. CONCLUSIONS


     The Black Creek demonstration and research project led to several gen-
eral  conclusions  which  are reported in this section.  Additionally, more
specific conclusions are included in the various sections of this document.
The  conclusions  reported in this section represent a consensus of the in-
vestigators and administrators in the Black Creek project.   The  order  in
which  they  are  presented is not intended to reflect the degree of impor-
tance with which the conclusion or subject is viewed.


2.1 FECAL POLLUTION OF BLACK CREEK

(See Section 4.4)
     Fecal contamination and water quality criteria have significant impli-
cations for the swimmable fishable goal of public law 92-500.  If that goal
is defined to mean water clean enough to allow whole body  contact  recrea-
tion,  then  fecal  coliforms should not exceed 200 per 100 ml.  This value
represents a threshold value above which the frequency of water borne human
pathogens  greatly  increases.   Under  current  regulations for the Maumee
River and Black Creek, the standard is a weighted average of no  more  than
1,000  fecal  coliforms  per 100 ml, and a peak value of no more than 2,000
per 100 ml.  These standards, in effect, regulate the water  quality  at  a
level  which  insures only limited body contact recreation, such as fishing
and boating.

1.  Fecal coliforms for the Black Creek in general exceed the water quality
standards for whole body contact (200 per 100 ml).

2.  Fecal coliform concentrations were not demonstrated to surpass the  ex-
isting  Maumee River standard in the portions of Black Creek not influenced
by discharges (septic tank effluent) from the town of  Harlan  (pop.  600).
However,  these  standards  were exceeded in portions of Black Creek influ-
enced by the town of Harlan.

3.  Livestock sources of fecal pollution  were  detected  during  a  runoff
event  in  March, 1977, in areas with unconfined livestock operations (pas-
ture and barnlot).

4.  High flows carried higher concentrations of bacteria than low flows  as
a result of two phenomena:

     (1)  contamination from human sources is flushed from fecally  contam-
     inated  bottom  sediment  in  channels  and/or  tile lines during high
     flows, and

     (2)  contamination from livestock sources is carried by  surface  flow
     to stream channels.

5.  Biotic communities of stream reaches below  septic  tank  outfalls  and
below livestock waste discharges were affected in the following ways:

     (1)  Only the most pollution tolerant forms are present  in  areas  of
     long-term, gross pollution (at septic tank outfalls).
CONCLUSIONS

-------
      (2)   Modified invertebrate  species  composition  and  abundances  are
      recorded   in  areas  of long-term,  moderate to low levels of pollution
      downstream of septic tank outfalls.

      (3)   The  effect on aquatic life of  short-term, moderate to high levels
      of pollution during some runoff events has not been established.

      (4)   Short-term, gross pollution caused by a discharge of manure slur-
      ry from an animal waste holding pit resulted in an extensive fish kill
      (8 km of  stream)  and a complete disruption of the aquatic community.

 6.   In  the vicinity of septic tank  outfalls,  aquatic  communities  are  ad-
 versely affected.
 2.2  TOXIC  SUBSTANCES

 (See Section  4.4.8)

 1.   Spot checks of  levels of  contamination by a  variety of  toxic substances
 (pesticides,  PCB's,   and heavy metals)  in water,  sediment,  and  fish tissue
 show these to be at levels below  those of concern  for  human health.
 2.3 FISH

 (See Section 4.5)

 1.  Thirty-five species of fish have been  collected   in  the  Black  Creek
 watershed.   However,  this  number of species does not necessarily reflect
 the decline in value of the fishery resource in Black  Creek.

 2.  Many  individuals  and  some  species  migrate  into  the  Black  Creek
 watershed each year in search of spawning and nursery  grounds.

 3.  Others reside permanently in the watershed, especially in more protect-
 ed areas associated with forested sections of streams.

 4.  Fishes in unprotected areas tend to suffer high mortality and depend on
 replacement  from  outside  areas each year.  Unprotected areas include re-
 gions of straight stream channels and areas not shaded by overhanging vege-
 tation.   Typically  they  will also have uniform bottoms, often of sand or
 silt.

 5.  Even relatively protected areas, such as wooded streams,  will  experi-
 ence massive mortality in unusually dry or cold periods.

 6.  In Black Creek all areas  are  recolonized  quickly  (during  the  next
 spring),  even after mass mortality, unless channels are obstructed by con-
 struction or other activities.  Other activities include channel  modifica-
 tion  which create unsuitable habitat — high temperatures, low oxygen con-
 tent, algal blooms, etc.   However, the recolonization is often  futile  be-
cause the fishes will soon die in the poor habitat of unprotected areas.

7.  The primary factor governing diversity of fish communities is complexi-
                                                                CONCLUSIONS

-------
 10
 ty  of  habitat.   More diverse  habitat structure will  support fish communi-
 ties of high diversity.

 8.   These  results show that it  will  take more  than  improved   water  quality
 to  insure  that  waters are "fishable." Management  for "fishable  and swimm-
 able" objective must  also   consider   suitable   habitat  structure,  trophic
 structure   of community,   allocthonous  energy inputs,  and  temperature  re-
 gimes.


 2.4 CONSERVATION  PRACTICE  INSTALLATION AND WATER QUALITY

 (See Section 4.15 and Section 5.3)


      The project  work plan did  not call for detailed study of construction
 impacts on  water quality.  It is generally agreed that erosion  is  greatly
 accelerated by construction activities including  the installation of  many
 permanent   practices.    (For  example,  stream bank protection, structures,
 grassed waterways and PTO  terraces.)  The following  fundamental points  con-
 cerning construction  and  water  quality need to be  stressed because they
 were overlooked in the planning of Black Creek.

 1.   Construction  activities associated with the installation  of   conserva-
 tion measures can result in short term concentrated delivery  of sediment to
 stream  channels and the alteration of  biotic communities.  Depending on the
 magnitude  of  the  construction, on-site and downstream  water quality, stream
 habitat, and  biotic communities are altered for   time  periods  of  several
 days up to  several years.

 2.   Streams with  aquatic resource potential need  to be identified  and  pro-
 tected  from construction induced damages.

 3.   Programs  that utilize  soil  conservation  practices  to   improve  water
 quality demand careful planning and installation  of the  practices  to reduce
 sediment delivery to  streams and other associated impacts on downstream and
 on-site aquatic resources.

 4.   Planners  and  field technicians need to be   trained  in  the  ecological
 principles  that  are  the  basis of understanding and  recognizing  sensitive
 aquatic resources.


 2.5 NUTRIENT AND  SEDIMENT TRANSPORT

 (See Section  4.6, Section  5.2, and Section 5.3)

 1.  Amounts of runoff, sediment, and   nutrients  discharged   from  a  small
watershed   are greatly affected by rainfall.  Reductions in rainfall give a
greater percentage reduction in runoff which in turn gives a  still  greater
percentage  reduction  in sediment and nutrient transport.

 2.  During  years with above average rainfall, land  slope  is  clearly  the
dominant   factor  affecting  sediment  yields.  However, with below average
 rainfall, the effect of land use on sediment yields becomes relatively more
 important.  This  reflects  the natural  sequence of the  rainfall-runoff event


CONCLUSIONS

-------
                                                                          11


 because rainfall must first meet the storage capabilities of the  soil  and
 land surface before runoff begins.

 3.   With average or above average rainfall patterns,  more than  90  percent
 of   the total phosphorus transported is sediment bound,  while only about 50
 percent of the total nitrogen transported is sediment bound.  Models  of  P
 transport  can be based on the erosion sedimentation  process.  We recommend
 that models of N transport not be based on the  erosion-sedimentation  pro-
 cess only.

 4.   Transport of sediment and nutrients is strongly associated  with  large
 storms which occur only a few times during a year.

 5.   In order to characterize  nutrient  and  sediment loading  from  small
 watersheds,  runoff from large storm events must be  well-monitored and,  with
 few exceptions,  automated sampling  is required.

 6.   During snow melt,  the transport of soluble nutrients may be  dispropor-
 tionally high when compared with snow melt runoff.

 7.   Sediment  and  sediment-associated  nutrient concentrations   increase
 markedly with large storm events.

 8.   Average  concentrations of sediment and nutrients   discharged  from  the
 Black  Creek Watershed are in line  with measured concentrations in the  Mau-
 mee River.

 9.   Losses of soluble  inorganic  phosphorus,  ammonium   and nitrate-nitrogen
 from  the watershed are  partially  due to  the input of these chemical  forms
 by  precipitation.

 10.   Most of the sediment and sediment-bound nutrients originate in  runoff
 from the land surface.  The discharge of ammonium is  also largely associat-
 ed  with runoff from land  surfaces.   However,  the discharge from septic  tank
 outlets  contributes   substantial   amounts  of soluble inorganic phosphorus
 into the streams in the watershed.

 11.   Sediments in  runoff  are nutrient enriched.   The  least  enrichment  oc-
 curs  from  subsurface  drains and  the most  from septic  tank outfalls.  The
 sediments in Black  Creek  have an enrichment  factor  of about  three  as   com-
 pared  to the uneroded  soils  in the  watershed.

 12.   Farming techniques common to the  19th century  but still  used   by  the
 Amish   did   not  seem to improve  the water  quality in  streams from that  area
 of  the  Black Creek Watershed  in  which  they reside.

 13.  The effects of agricultural nonpoint  source  pollution and point source
 pollution on our  water  resources  are sufficiently different  that direct
 comparisons  between them cannot  be made and separate  objectives   for  their
 evaluation and control  are in order.

 14.   In  the absence of surface runoff and tile  flow, quality  of ground water
 flowing   in  channels downstream changes, demonstrating that stream  channel
and  riparian environments affect water quality.

15.   During most flow conditions, large inputs of  sediment   and  nutrients
                                                                CONCLUSIONS

-------
 12
 occur  at  BarIan.

 16.  Areas remote  from  Harlan generally have   lower   nutrient  and   sediment
 concentrations  than  those  at Harlan.

 17.  Water  quality characteristic vary significantly over  short stream dis-
 tances.   This  emphasizes  the  importance of  careful  selection of monitoring
 stations  for monitoring water  quality.

 18.  A  meandering  section of stream  flowing through a woodlot acted   like   a
 natural sediment  trap.

 19.  Adjacent subwatersheds of  similar  size,  topography  and soil type   pro-
 duce  runoff of varying quality due to  differences in land use and  applica-
 tion of conservation practices.  These  results emphasize the need   for de-
 tailed experimental  analysis of the determinants of  water  quality.


 2.6  STREAM  CHANNEL STABILITY

 (See Section 4.2)

 1.   Total stream  bank  erosion  is small  although at the  site of  erosion  it
 may  appear  severe.   There is no apparent correlation  of  bank erosion with
 adjacent  land use.   Over 80 percent of  the bank erosion was reported in the
 areas  containing  Eel and Shoals type soils.

 2.   Channel bottom erosion produced  unstable  channel  banks  in  several
 areas.  Channel stabilizing structures  and bank stabilizing activities have
 eliminated many severe problems.  Rock  drop  structures  were especially suc-
 cessful for this  purpose.

 3.   Seeding of  the banks to establish vegetative cover  is   most successful
 where  slopes are 2:1 or flatter.   The  advantage of  the flatter  slopes jus-
 tify the additional  land area required  to install them.  Mulch is necessary
 to   establish   a  good  seeding.  Stone mulch  materials are  the  most  success-
 ful.   The stone mulch has  the advantage of not  being  washed   away during
 periods of high flow.


 2.7  SEDIMENT POND

 (See Section 4.3)

 1.   The sediment  pond had  a measurable  and beneficial impact on water  qual-
 ity.   However,   it  is recognized  that, in  the long  term,  a pond which re-
moves  a large quantity of  sediment  will require either  a difficult  cleanout
 or will become  ineffective.

 2. In  the first two  years  following construction of  the  sediment   pond  an
 equivalent  amount of sediment to 2.8 t/ha/yr (1.2 T/ac/yr)  from the entire
watershed was collected in the pond.  Most of this was due  to   one  50-year
 recurrence  interval storm which caused unusual erosion on  the  nearly  level
watershed.

 3. No measurable  increase  in sediment was observed from July  1976  through


CONCLUSIONS

-------
                                                                         13
July  1977.   During  this period, runoff was small and very little erosion
was occurring on the watershed.

4.  About 95 percent of the material reported above was particles less than
50 y m  in diameter.  This indicates the effectiveness of the pond in trap-
ping particles which control are difficult to  control  by  land  treatment
consistent  with  row  crop  production  and suggests the value of sediment
ponds.
2.8  IN CHANNEL DESILTING BASIN

(See Section 4.3)

1.  During the first two years following construction, the  basin  was  ap-
proximately  one-half filled due in part to channel construction activities
above the basin and to one greater than 50-year recurrence interval storm.

2.  The largest amount of material was of the coarser particles.

3.  Turbidity, total solids, and total phosphorus  increase  as  the  water
transits the basin during low flow conditions.

4.  For continued operation, periodic clean out would be required.

5.  Except in unusual circumstances, the use  of  an  in-channel  desilting
basin will have negative impacts on water quality and is not recommended.
2. 9 TILLAGE

(See Section 4.7)

1.  On soils where conservation tillage for corn is adapted and where pests
are  easily  controlled, there should be little or no cost for the benefits
gained in erosion control and water quality.

2.  Fall chiseling can replace moldboard plowing for  corn  after  corn  or
corn  after  beans,  on most Black Creek soils without limiting production,
where weeds can be controlled.

3.  Shallow tillage or no-till planting for corn after corn or  corn  after
beans  should not limit production on well or moderately well drained soils
where perennial weeds are not a serious problem.

4.  No-till planting for corn into a chemically killed sod should not limit
production,  compared to moldboard plowing, where perennial weeds are not a
serious problem.

5.  Perennial and herbicide resistant weeds, such as Canada thistle,  field
bindweed and morning glory are more likely to be yield limiting factors for
soybeans than for corn with no-plow tillage.

6.  Shallow tillage or no-till planting, is likely to lead to more  serious
phytophthora root rot problems for soybeans on poorly drained soils, unless
                                                                CONCLUSIONS

-------
 14
 resistant varieties are  available.

 7.  Farmers  are not likely  to adopt conservation   tillage  practices   until
 success can  be proven and demonstrated  in  their area.

 8.  Some form or  forms of conservation   tillage   that  have  proven   to   be
 adapted to soils  in an area should be a high priority BMP.

 9.  For corn, where perennial and resistant weeds are a problem, added her-
 bicide  costs  and/or  reduced yields with conservation tillage will  reduce
 profit.  With herbicides currently available,  the effect of  problem   weeds
 on  soybeans under conservation tillage is likely to be more severe than  on
 corn.
2.10 TILE DRAINAGE

                           (Based on Grab Samples)



 (See Section 4.6)

1.  Tile effluent yields small amounts of sediment and  sediment-bound  nu-
trients.

2.  Tile effluent is relatively high in nitrate-N  concentrations  as  com-
pared to these concentrations in the receiving streams.

3.  Nitrate concentration in tile effluent increased with intensity of  row
crop farming.

4.  Septic contamination of tile outlets is common  and  greatly  increases
the  soluble  inorganic phosphorus and ammonium yields from the Black Creek
Watershed .

5.  Sediment and nutrient concentrations are not correlated with tile  flow
for most of the tiles monitored.

6.  Tile discharge must be well monitored during storm events to get  mean-
ingful  loading  data.  Data from grab samples are not sufficient to deter-
mine storm induced loadings.

7.  The low degree of correlation emphasizes the inherent weakness with any
weekly grab sampling program especially for small watersheds.


                        (Based on Automatic  Sampler)
 (See Section 4.6)

1.  BMP's which allow more water to flow through  a  tile  drainage  system
will  significantly reduce total losses of runoff,sediment and nutrients.
Nitrate-N is the only nutrient which may increase in concentration, but the
CONCLUSIONS

-------
                                                                          15
 greater  percentage reduction in runoff yields a lower  total  loss.

 2.   Rainfall  during late  winter and early spring produces a  high percentage
 of   the  annual  water,  sediment and  nutrient loses from an agricultural tile
 drainage system.

 3.   A positive  correlation (R-squared  = 0.1 to 0.86) is shown between sedi-
 ment and nutrient concentrations and tile flow.

 4.   Initial flow  following a storm  yields higher sediment and nutrient con-
 centration levels than equivalent flow levels when discharge is receding.

 5.   The  monitored Hoytville soil is very responsive hydrologically to  sub-
 surface   drainage  and appears to have a higher  hydraulic conductivity than
 indicated in  published soil survey  reports.   This may  be  due  in   part by
 deep cracking of  the soil.

 6.   Tile flow exhibits a  diurnal variation during  freeze-thaw  periods of
 the  year.

 7.   Tile effluent yields  an insignificant amount of phosphorus  to  streams
 as compared to  surface runoff.

 8.   Nitrate is  the dominant nutrient in tile  effluent.   Losses of  total ni-
 trogen were on  the order  of 5  percent  of nitrogen applied as fertilizer for
 two  rather dry  years.

 9.   Both insecticide and  herbicide   were  detected in  the   tile   effluent
 shortly   after  a surface application.   Losses were of the order of .1 per-
 cent of  applied amounts.   Deep cracking is believed to be the  reason  for
 this pesticide  movement.


 2.11 WATER QUALITY BASED  ON GRAB SAMPLE DATA

 (See Section  4.6.5)

 1.   Annual loadings were  not accurately predicted  by   use of  weekly  grab
 samples   alone  (see  Table 60) . Weekly grab   sampling provides adequate
 description only  of base  flow  conditions .

 2.   For  accurate  loading  information during   storm events,   grab   sampling
 must  be accomplished  at   an  interval  significantly  shorter  than the time
 response of a watershed.

 3.   An annual cycle  exists  for  the concentration  level  of nitrate  and to  a
 much  less degree  for  ammonia.  Suspended  solid and phosphorus data did not
 exhibit  this  behavior.

 4.   Total phosphorus and  nitrogen concentrations have a  positive   correla-
 tion   (R-squared  =  0.11   to   0.60)  with suspended solids concentrations,
whereas  soluble forms of phosphorus  and  nitrogen are  not correlated with
 suspended solids  (see Table  61) .

 5.   Suspended solid  and sediment bound nutrient concentrations  have a posi-
 tive  correlation   (R-squared  =  0.092   to 0.41) with  stage.   Soluble com-
                                                                CONCLUSIONS

-------
16
ponents have no correlation with stage.

6.  Water quality data for streams from small watersheds  exhibits  a  high
degree of scatter, due in part to the wide variation in flow.

7. There is no simple function relationship between flow rate and suspended
solid or nutrient concentrations.
2.12 ALGAL BIOASSAY STUDY

(See Section 4.11)

1.  Maximum algal growth occurred at soluble P levels of approximately  0.1
mg/1.

2.  Not all soluble P in Black Creek drainage water was available to  algae
in a four day incubation.

3.  Phosphorus was the major limiting nutrient for algal  growth  in  Black
Creek drainage water.

4.  Addition of micronutrients increased algal growth and apparent P  avai-
lability to algae suggesting that the micronutrient content of water limits
algal growth in sediment-free systems.

5.  Approximately 20 percent of total sediment-bound P was available to al-
gae  in  a  two  week  incubation.  Samples taken in March and June yielded
similar results.

6.  Approximately 30 percent of sediment-bound inorganic P was available to
algae in a two week incubation.

7.  The ammonium flouride, sodium hydroxide, and HC1 extractable  fractions
of  sediment  inorganic P all contribute to the pool of available P for al-
gae.  The ammonium flouride and sodium hydroxide extractable sediment inor-
ganic  P fractions were the most available to algae representing an average
of 43 and 38 percent of P taken up respectively.


2.13 LABORATORY INCUBATION STUDIES

(See Section 4.10)

1.  The concentration of nitrate N in incubated Black Creek stream  samples
increased  with  time  as  a  result  of  mineralization and nitrification.
Treatments which increased microbial growth (high  temperatures,  aeration,
calcium  carbonate  amendment,  and  addition of inorganic N) increased the
rate of mineralization in samples.

2.  The concentration of soluble  inorganic  P  in  incubated  Black  Creek
stream  samples  slowly  increased  with  time.  Increased temperatures and
aeration accelerated release of soluble inorganic P from sediment.
CONCLUSIONS

-------
                                                                         17
2. 14 RAINULATOR

(See Section 4.1)

1.  Soil losses from nearly level lake plain soils under fallow  conditions
are  much  less than those of more sloping soils in the watershed.  Even on
nearly level soils, significant differences in loss can occur.   These  are
related to soil structure.

2.  Soil erosion is a highly selective process.   Sediment  shows  distinct
clay enrichment and sometimes silt enrichment.

3.  Effective measures for reducing erosion on nearly level soils should be
based on prevention of detachment of naturally occurring aggregates.

4.  Protecting the soil surface from raindrop impact is one of the most ef-
fective means of minimizing sediment concentrations in runoff.

5.  Soil losses are reduced by those tillage systems which  leave  appreci-
able crop residues on the surface.

6.  Fall chiseling after corn, although not as effective as the no-til  and
disc  treatments, significantly reduces erosion compared to moldboard plow-
ing.

7.  None of the conservation treatments are as effective following soybeans
as following corn.

8.  Sediment loads can be reduced by sod buffer strips.  The  effectiveness
of this practice is dependent on composition of sediment; rate and depth of
flow; and vigor and height of sod.

9.  Incorporation of applied annual waste will reduce  nutrient  losses  in
runoff.

10.  Waste application tends to reduce soil loss because of mulch effect.

11.  Sediments eroded from animal waste treated areas  is  highly  enriched
with nutrients because of manure particles in transported solids.

12.  Waste application to untilled soil  gave  larger  nutrient  losses  in
runoff than waste application on areas receiving some fall tillage.

13.  Surface applications of commercial fertilizers  to  fallow  soils  in-
crease  the  concentration  of  soluble  nitrate N, ammonium N, and soluble
inorganic P in runoff.  However, the portion of added fertilizer lost  with
intense rainstorms was low (less than 8% of added nutrients).

14.  The majority of N and P in surface runoff from fertilizer cropland  is
transported eroded sediment.  The bulk of sediment-bound N and P is associ-
ated with the clay fraction.

15.  The most successful approach for minimizing nutrient losses in surface
runoff  from  cropland  is a combination of soil erosion control and incor-
poration of fertilizers after application.
                                                                CONCLUSIONS

-------
18


16.  For  the purpose of modeling agriculture systems, certain parameters of
surface   runoff can be successfully estimated by analysis of the properties
of sediments or surface soils.
     a.   The concentration of soluble inorganic P in surface runoff can  be
     estimated  by  measurement of the equilibrium phosphorus concentration
     or the extractable phosphorus content of either the eroded sediment or
     original soil.
     b.   The concentration of soluble ammonium in runoff can  be  estimated
     from the exchangeable ammonium content of the eroded soil and original
     soil.
     c.   The concentration of nitrate in surface runoff was not related  to
     any  runoff  properties measured.  Modelling of nitrate loss in runoff
     will be difficult because nitrate losses are dependent  upon  a  large
     number of factors.
2.15 WATERSHED MODEL

(See Section 4.9.1)

1.  A comprehensive, distributed parameter simulator,  named  ANSWERS,  has
been developed.

2.  ANSWERS offers unique and important capabilities for use during  imple-
mentation phases of 208 planning.

3.  The importance of applying non-point source control measures on a high-
ly  site-specific basis has been clearly demonstrated by use of the ANSWERS
model on the Black Creek Watershed.

2J.6 REMOTE DATA ACQUISITION

(See Section 3.4.3.1)

1.  The feasibility has been demonstrated of operating a real-time environ-
mental  data acquisition system which supports remote field transducers and
computer activated sampling equipment under control of  a  general  purpose
time-sharing system.

2.  The concepts of the ALERT data acquisition  system  are  applicable  to
numerous  non-point  source  monitoring  requirements and result in several
operational benefits including: expanded data gathering, improved  validity
of  field data, more efficient utilization of field personnel and automated
early warning systems.


2.17 SOCIO-ECONOMIC CONCLUSIONS

(See Section 4.8)

1.  Government agencies make an important contribution in  encouraging  the
adoption  of  conservation  practices  by  providing information to farmers
about the practices.

2.  The favorable attitude of farmers and the high level  of  participation
indicate  adoption of practices can be achieved in most cases without coer-
CONCLUSIONS

-------
                                                                          19


cive legislation.

3.  A given level of water quality can be provided at  the  least  cost   to
participating farmers when they are provided as many alternatives as possi-
ble in selecting the management practices to achieve that required level  of
quality.

4.  Most economic costs are borne by those farmers who operate on the  more
erosive  land.   Therefore,  it  may be appropriate to concentrate the cost
sharing assistance on these situations.

5.  If the cost of a conservation practice is based only  on  yield  reduc-
tions,  the  yearly  dollar  loss  is  dependent on crop pieces.  When crop
prices are low, the cost of reducing soil loss is significantly lower  than
occurs in periods of high farm product prices.


2 .18 LAND MANAGEMENT

(See Section 3.3 and Section 5.1)

1.  The traditional approach to planning each acre  is  too  methodical   to
meet water quality objectives set out in 208 plans.

2.  Selection of practices must emphasize the goal of improving water qual-
ity but minimize negative effects on production.

3.  The land user must maintain practices.  Field technicians must be  able
to certify compliance on the basis of visual inspection (annual) during any
season of the year.

4.  Without the use of a simplified format (BMP),  conservation  plans  are
difficult for farmers to interpret and even more difficult for those trying
to certify compliance.

5.  The most faithfully maintained conservation practices  in  Black  Creek
were  those  that  provided a "visual reminder" of the contractual committ-
ment.  Most all permanent practices provide this visual mark  (field  bord-
ers, waterways, etc.).  Conversely, most management practices (tillage, ro-
tations, etc.) do not leave an easily observed year round mark or reminder.

6.  Planning to improve water quality alone will not leave a "showplace for
applied  conservation."  Concentrating  on  treating primarily the critical
areas on tillable land may be less apparent to the public.

7.  It is not possible to conclude that BMP's are not necessary, when aver-
age  gross  erosion from a large area is demonstrated to be small.  Neither
is it possible to conclude that because soil loss as measured by  the  USLE
is  below  the  tolerable soil loss limits, water quality will be adequate.
Losses may be large enough from relatively small critical areas to have   an
adverse  effect  on  water  quality.  (See Section 4.9.1). This further em-
phasizes the need to concentrate treatment efforts on critical areas.
                                                                CONCLUSIONS

-------
20


2.19  ADMINISTRATION

(See Section 3.3 and Section 5.1)

1.  The Allen County Soil and Water Conservation District demonstrated  its
ability  to  deal  with a complex program of water quality management.  The
availability of district personnel, paid with local funds  and  responsible
to the board of supervisors, was important to this capability.

2.  Public Information was vital to the success of the  demonstration  pro-
ject.   Because  all parts of the community were informed of plans and pro-
gress at all steps of the project, rumors and potential opposition  to  the
project did not develop.

3.  The ability of the local administration to alter cost sharing rates was
important  both  in convincing landowners to apply certain practices and in
avoiding paying higher cost-share rates than necessary  on  practices  that
proved to be popular.

4.  Cost of treating a watershed such as the Black Creek  can  be  categor-
ized.   Necessary  land  treatment involves water quality improvement, soil
protection, increasing or maintaining agricultural productive capabilities,
and  other  conservation purposes.  All of these goals should be considered
in a watershed program.  However, attempts should be made to  assign  costs
to  the appropriate category.  All soil conservation costs for a particular
watershed cannot be considered costs of improving water quality.

5.  Local leadership, such as a Soil and Water Conservation District, is in
the most favorable position to combine all state and local and federal pro-
grams into a total system which will balance the sometime conflicting water
quality improvement goals.

6.  The most cost effective method  of  achieving  improved  water  quality
through  the  best  management practice approach is to concentrate remedial
efforts on those critical areas within watersheds where maximum benefit can
be  obtained.   It  may  not  be  necessary  to  treat  every acre of every
watershed to achieve realistic water quality goals.
TECHNICAL APPROACH

-------
                           SECTION III
                       Technical Approach
Section              Title

  3.1       Selection of Black Creek
  3.2       Design of Land Treatment
  3.3       Technical Approach
Authors
J. Morrison
J. Lake
J. Lake
T. D. McCain
R. Land
Page
21
47
51
                                           D.  Nelson
                                           E.  Monke
                                           A.  Bottcher
                                           L.  Hugqins
                                           S.  Mahler

-------

-------
                                                                         21
3.1  SELECTION OF BLACK CREEK

     One of the most important tasks undertaken during the six-month  plan-
ning  phase  of  this program was the selection of a study area which would
accurately represent the Maumee Basin.

     It was originally proposed that the area to be studied contain no more
than 20,000 acres.  This represents less than one percent of the total land
area in the Maumee Basin.  Because of the small size of the study  area  in
comparison  to  the  basin, it was necessary to find a study area which was
similar to the basin in characteristics of soil type,  land  use,  cultural
practices, and anticipated future land use.

     It was also considered necessary to select a study  area  so  that  it
would  be  possible to both monitor gross results and to conduct small plot
experiments.

3.1.1 Selection Criteria

     To facilitate the selection of the most representative study area, the
following general criteria were used:

1.  The study area should include lake bed and upland soils which are  rea-
sonably representative of much of the total basin.

2.  Sufficient drainageways should be present so that  monitoring  stations
could  be  installed to evaluate erosion and sedimentation both from upland
areas as well as where the channel enters the Maumee River.

3.  Existing land uses and cultural practices should be comparable to those
of the total Maumee Basin.

4.  The anticipated future land uses should be typical  of  those  expected
throughout the Maumee Basin.

5.  The physiography of the study area should facilitate the separation  of
runoff between agricultural areas and land under other uses.

6.  It was considered desirable to have legal drains in the area with  long
time records.

7.  The study area should drain directly into the Maumee River.

8.  The area should be up to 20,000 acres in size.


     The area selected as most nearly satisfying  these  criteria  was  the
12,038 acres which drain into Black Creek in northeastern Allen County.

3.1.2 Comparison of Area, Maumee Basin

     The Black Creek watershed contains both soils and land uses which  are
representative  of  the  Basin.  Black Creek Study Area contains 36 percent
upland soils of the silty clay loam till of the Ft. Wayne  moraine  in  the
                                                         TECHNICAL APPROACH

-------
22


Blount-Morley-Pewamo  association.  Soils are 39 percent Blount, 38 percent
Morley and 16 percent Pewamo with only 7 percent minor soils.

     Below the upland, in a belt about 1-1/2 miles wide, on the lake plain,
is  an  apron  of  medium-textured  sediments  underlying  the  Rensselaer-
Whitaker-Oshtemo  association  comprising  25  percent  of  the  watershed.
Poorly-drained  Rensselaer  and Whitaker make up 28 and 21 percent, respec-
tively, and excessively drained Oshtemo 6 percent.   Soils  such  as  well-
drained Martinsville and Belmore, comprise the remaining 5 percent.

     Toward the outer edge of this apron is a small association, making  up
5  percent of the watershed, where sandy loams overlie clays at less than 3
feet.  This area, in the Haskins-Hoytville association, contains 34 percent
poorly-drained  Haskins, 31 percent poorly-drained Nappanee, and 35 percent
minor soils.

     On the main lake plain itself comprising 29 percent of  the  watershed
is  the  very  level  high clay (40-50 percent clay in subsoils) Hoytville-
Nappanee association.  About 48 percent is dark  poorly-drained  Hoytville,
23 percent is light colored Nappanee and 29 percent is of minor soils.

     Alluvial soils of overflow bottomlands comprise only 5 percent of  the
watershed  and  occur  mainly along the lower reaches of the Black Creek in
the four miles before it enters the Maumee River.  Narrow bodies  occur  in
the  upland as along Wertz Drain and the main stem of Black Creek southwest
of BarIan.  In this Shoals-Eel association, Shoals soils comprise  44  per-
cent, Eel 20 percent and minor soils 27 percent.

     These five soil associations comprise a range of soil conditions vary-
ing from those with 50 percent subsoil clay to those with less than 10 per-
cent. Surface soils range from silty clays to loamy fine sands.

     Only the Paulding and Latty clay areas, having over 50 percent clay in
the subsoils and Ottokee and Granby, on the deep sand deposits of the north
part of the lake plain east of Archbold, are not represented in  the  Black
Creek  Watershed.   Data  concerning these soil types is being collected in
another study being undertaken by Ohio State University.

     Comparing percentages by land capability classes  and  subclasses  for
the Maumee Basin with those for lands in the Black Creek Study Area reveals
how closely this watershed represents conditions in the Maumee Basin  as  a
whole.  Table 1 illustrates this comparison.

     The Maumee Basin is an area of intensive farming, producing corn, soy-
beans,  wheat, sugar beets, speciality crops including tomatoes, and others
for canning.  Amount of land in tillage-rotation varies from about 75 to 90
percent, being least in the more rolling counties and greatest in the coun-
ties which are mostly in the lake plain.  Wooded land ranges from 5  to  19
percent  among counties, being greatest in the sandiest ones, and permanent
pasture is generally low.   The  two  most  urbanized  counties  are  Lucas
(Ohio),  where 43 percent is occupied by Toledo and its environs, and Allen
(Indiana), where 12 percent is in Ft. Wayne and its surroundings.

     More than 95 percent of the Black Creek Study Area is devoted to agri-
cultural  uses.   This includes nearly 81 percent in cropland, 4 percent in
pasture, 7 percent in woodland, 4 percent  in  other  agricultural  related


TECHNICAL APPROACH

-------
                                                                         23
                                  TABLE 1
   Land Capability Comparisons - Mauraee Basin and Black Creek Study Area
Capability
Class
Subclass
I
He
Hie
IVe
IIw-IIIw
Hs-IIIs-IVs-VIe

Percent
Different
Maumee Basin
0.9
7.4
3.5
1.4
82.6
4.2
100.0
of Land Area In
Land Capabilities
Black Creek Area
2.4
12.6
3.0
1.3
79.6
1.1
100.0
uses and 4 percent in urban and built-up areas.  This distribution of  land
use compares favorably with the land use in the total Maumee River Basin as
shown in Table 2.
                                  TABLE 2
       Land Use Comparisons - Maumee Basin and Black Creek Study Area
                        Percent of Lands in Different Uses
Land Use
Cropland
Pasture
Woodland
Urban & Built-up
Other

Maumee Basin
73
4
8
9
6
100
Black Creek Study Area
80.7
4.3
7.1
3.6
4.3
100.0
     As in the Maumee Basin, corn and soybeans are the major crops produced
with  an  estimated  7,000  acres devoted to these crops.  Small grains and
meadow in rotation represent a correspondingly smaller amount  of  cropland
acreage.

     The scattered woodlands and the relatively smaller acreages of pasture
and  haylands  in the Black Creek Study Area are typical of these land uses
in the Maumee Basin.

     Urban and built-up acreages for the study area are less, on a  percen-
tage basis, than for the total basin, since data for the basin includes the
large population centers of Toledo and Lima, Ohio, and Ft. Wayne,  Indiana.
The  Black  Creek Study Area town of Harlan is fairly representative of the
small towns and villages found in the Maumee Basin.

     The Maumee Basin was one of the last areas of the Lake Erie  Basin  to
be  settled.   Although Fort Wayne and Toledo were among the outposts esta-
blished around 1800, it was not until the Erie Canal opened an  easy  water
route to the region in 1825, that settlement of the Lake Erie region really
                                                         TECHNICAL APPROACH

-------
24
flourished.  The "Great Black Swamp" was the last area to be  settled.   It
comprises  the major portion of the Maumee Basin and represents the area of
the formerly glacial Lake Maumee.

     It was primarily the German settlers, with  their  knowledge  of  farm
drainage,  who  brought the black soils of the former lake bed into produc-
tive use.  By the middle of the nineteenth century, the  dense  forests  of
this  area had been cut, and the broad, flat lands now have one of the most
extensive farm drainage systems in the nation.

     The Maumee Basin is today the largest and most productive agricultural
area within the entire Lake Erie region.  Except for some suburban!zing in-
fluences in the Toledo, Lima, and Ft. Wayne areas, the Maumee Basin is  al-
most entirely devoted to agricultural use.

     The Maumee River Basin comprises 6,608 square miles,  of  which  1,283
are in northeastern Indiana, 4,862 in northwestern Ohio and 463 in southern
Michigan.  Approximately 4,229,100 acres are involved in 26 counties: 17 in
Ohio,  6  in Indiana and 3 in Michigan.  In Ohio, the Basin includes all of
Allen, Defiance, Henry, Paulding, Putnam, Van Wert, and Williams  Counties;
substantial  portions  of Auglaize, Fulton, Hancock, Hardin, Lucas, Mercer,
and Wood Counties; and  smaller  areas  of  Seneca,  Shelby,  and  Wyandot.
Within Indiana, the Basin includes substantial portions of Adams, Allen and
DeKalb Counties and smaller portions of Noble, Steuben and Wells  Counties.
The  Michigan  portion  includes portions of Hillsdale and Lenawee Counties
and a very small portion of Branch County.

     The average annual rainfall for the Basin ranges  between  28  and  36
inches.   The  mean annual temperature is about 50 degrees Fahrenheit, with
monthly means ranging between approximately 25-30 degrees  in  January  and
February  and  70-75  degrees  in  July and August.  The mean length of the
freeze-free period ranges between 150 and 180 days for most of the Basin.

     The basin is roughly circular in shape, measuring about 100  miles  in
diameter.   The Maumee River is formed at Ft. Wayne, Indiana by the conflu-
ence of the St. Joseph River and St. Mary's River.  The  St.  Joseph  River
rises  in  Hillsdale  County,  Michigan,  and flows southwestward.  The St.
Mary's River rises in Auglaize County, Ohio and flows  in  a  northwestward
direction  to  Ft. Wayne, where it turns abruptly to a northeastward direc-
tion before joining with the St. Joseph River to  form  the  Maumee  River.
The  Maumee River flows in a northeastward direction from Ft. Wayne, across
the Basin to Toledo and its entrance to the Maumee Bay of Lake  Erie.   Two
major  tributaries,  the  Tiffin  River  and Auglaize River join the Maumee
River from the north and south respectively, at Defiance, Ohio.

     Topography ranges from a nearly flat, featureless plain across much of
the  center  and  eastern portion of the Basin to rolling hills around por-
tions of the Basin's periphery, especially in Michigan  and  Indiana.   The
altitude ranges from nearly 1150 feet (mean sea level) in Hillsdale County,
Michigan to 570 feet at the mouth of the Maumee River.  Local relief ranges
from a few tenths of a foot over much of the area to nearly 100 feet in the
rolling hills of Michigan and Indiana.  The Maumee River flows in a  tortu-
ous  channel entrenched some 25 to 40 feet below the lacustrine plain.  The
river is generally lacking any significant terrace or flood plain  develop-
TECHNICAL APPROACH

-------
                                                                         25
ment.

     The erosion rates of the Maumee River Basin are often  reported  among
the  highest  in the Great Lakes Basin.  The estimated annual gross erosion
exceeds 4-1/2 tons per acre.  By contrast, the current estimated gross ero-
sion rate for the entire Great Lakes Basin is about 2 tons per acre.  Sedi-
ment yields in the Basin are relatively large, as indicated by  Waterville,
Ohio  gage  data.  From 1951 to 1958, nearly 1-1/2 million tons of sediment
passed the Waterville gage annually.  In addition, the sediment load in the
River  fluctuates greatly.  For example, during a 3-day period in February,
1959, nearly one-half million tons of sediment passed the Waterville gage.

     Physiographically, the Maumee River Basin is essentially a nearly lev-
el  plain  that represents a portion of the abandoned floor of glacial Lake
Maumee which occupied the Lake Erie Basin in late Pleistocene time.   Aban-
doned  shoreline  deposits  diverge  in  a  northeastward and southeastward
direction from Ft. Wayne.  Dominant surficial deposits  include  lacustrine
clays  and sands and reworked, wave-scoured lake-bottom till.  Bedrock con-
sists predominantly of Silurian  and  Devonian  limestones,  dolomites  and
shales.   Depth  to bedrock in the Indiana portion of the Basin ranges from
less than 50 feet to about 150 feet.

     The Maumee River Basin is primarily agricultural, with  more  than  90
percent  of  the  land  in the Basin in agricultural use.  Approximately 73
percent is in cropland, 4 percent in pasture, 8 percent in woodland, 6 per-
cent in other agricultural related uses and 9 percent in urban and built-up
areas.  The principal crops grown are corn, soybeans, wheat, and oats, with
some  sugar  beets.  There are also significant acreages of vegetable crops
and nursery stock produced within the  Basin.   Sales  from  livestock  and
livestock  products  account  for  about one-fourth of the income from farm
sales.

     Total population in the  area  is  approximately  1,295,000  of  which
50,000 reside in Michigan, 275,000 in Indiana, and the remaining 970,000 in
Ohio.  Toledo, Ohio and Ft. Wayne, Indiana, are the major cities with Lima,
Findlay, and Defiance, Ohio, being the other major population centers.  The
remainder of the  Basin  is  primarily  rural  with  a  number  of  smaller
agriculturally-oriented communities.

     The principal industries are machinery, electrical and  transportation
equipment manufacture, metal fabrication, petroleum refining, and food pro-
cessing.  Major industrial centers within the Basin are  Toledo  and  Lima,
Ohio and Ft. Wayne, Indiana.

     Toledo ranks as the nation's third largest railroad  center,  and  the
city's  port,  which  is  the  ninth  largest  in the United States, is the
world's largest shipper of soft coal.  Major products passing  through  the
port  include  iron  ore, farm products, machinery, and petroleum products.
Lima, Ohio is the center of an oil distribution system for the Great  Lakes
and  Eastern markets, while Toledo is the largest petroleum refining center
between Chicago and the Eastern Seaboard.

     The drainage basins of the St. Joseph and St. Mary's River which  join
at  Ft.  Wayne  (where  they reverse course and head toward Lake Erie), are
largely controlled by glacial features of the Lake Erie glacial lobe.  This
lobe  pushed  across  rocks  mainly of limestone and shale and carried fine
                                                         TECHNICAL APPROACH

-------
 26
 till material  into present day northwest Ohio, northeast and  east  central
 Indiana   and   south  central Michigan.  During the last major stand of  this
 glacial lobe,  in  its retreat some 10,000 years ago, the Fort Wayne  moraine
 was  deposited concentric  to the front of  the retreating lobe  (see Figure
 1), and this dammed up a great body of water between it  and  the  eastward
 retreating  ice front of the lobe.  This water body was named by geologists
 "glacial  lake  Maumee," and the land area once covered by it is known  today
 as "the lake plain."

 3.1.2.1 GENERAL NATURE OF THE LAKE PLAIN

     Glacial Lake Maumee did not remain long enough to influence all of the
 lake  plain uniformly. In the west end and along the south border it merely
 reworked  the glacial till beneath it, leveling the surface but leaving only
 a  thin   deposit  of  fine lake-laid sediments.  Similar areas occur in the
 central part of tne bacin northeast and  east  of  Defiance.  There  are  a
 number  of areas  where clays are overlaid by sandy or loamy sediments up to
 3 feet thick.

     In areas  below the steep northeastern trending flank of the Ft.  Wayne
 moraine,  deltas  of loamy materials composed of eroded debris from the up-
 lands were deposited in Lake Maumee.  In this  and  similar  border  areas,
 temporary lake   stages  were recorded as beach ridges.  In these areas the
 material  deposited includes sandy and/or loamy beach ridges and deep  loamy
 sediments on  level  and  depressed areas.  Loamy sediments were deposited
 only thinly over  lake clays or till by action of water or wind.

     Near the  center of the glacial lake Maumee, fine sediments were  depo-
 sited most deeply as the retreating glacial lobe stood somewhat east of De-
 fiance.   Here  in  an east-facing crescent is an area known as  the  Paulding
 Basin.    These sediments  in the Paulding Basin are higher in clay content
 than any  other part of the Maumee Basin.  This area was the center of  what
 was  once called  the Maumee Swamp or Marsh.  Beach ridges developed concen-
 tric to the receding lake borders just as they did at the Fort Wayne end of
 the  glacial lake.  Between Defiance and Toledo, clay loam till reworked by
 waters of glacial lake Maumee lies east of the Paulding Basin.   The  north
 flank  of the  lake  plain  is mantled with thick to thin sands.  Sandiest
 areas occur just west of Bowling Green, southwest  of  Toledo  and  in  the
 Wauseon   vicinity.  In these same areas, sandy loam and loam mantles only a
 few feet  thick over clayey till or in  thin  mantles  of  loamy  sand  over
 clayey  till or lake-laid clays.  There is a high degree of local variation
 in these  areas in comparison with the more clayey parts of the lake plain.

 3.1.2.2 GLACIAL MORAINES AND TILL PLAINS

     Clay loam till, left by the receding glacial lobe of Lake Erie  occurs
 in parts  of nine Michigan, Ohio and Indiana counties on the northwest flank
 of the lake plain and twelve Indiana and Ohio counties on the southwest and
 south.    That  part  between St. Joseph River and the lake plain is perhaps
 the most  rolling with best expressed morainic features and is  mostly  part
 of  the   Fort  Wayne moraine.  That southeast of Fort Wayne and east toward
 Findlay lies lower and  is  less  rolling,  being  mostly  ground  moraine.
 Drainage  of   the  southwest portion is through the St. Mary's River, which
 parallels the  south flank of the Fort Wayne moraine.  The  eastern  portion
drains  toward  the  Auglaize  River  and its tributaries, which flow north
 through the lake plain.  The northern part drains through  the  St.  Joseph
TECHNICAL APPROACH

-------
                                                                           27
 M.WAYNE
              \
                \
                                                              RIVER BASIN BOUNDARY
                         Figure 1. Maumee Basin Map





River, which parallels  the  north  flank  of  the  Fort  Wayne  moraine,   and
                                                          TECHNICAL APPROACH

-------
28


through Tiffin River, which flows south across the lake plain.

     On the south flank, where the rise to the till plain is very  gradual,
it  is  hard  to  determine  the exact location of the lake plain boundary.
Since there was apparently less eroded debris from the uplands on the south
side, only a discontinuous apron of medium-textured deltaic deposits formed
on the southwestern flank.  However, there are a number of local  lake  bed
deposits and muck areas in the till plain which occupy broader depressions.
Also, there are lake border ridges like that one followed by  U.S.  Highway
30  southeast  of  Fort  Wayne,  and broader deltaic strips fringe the lake
plain in the area north of Lima and east toward Findlay.

     At the extreme north end of the St. Joseph River drainage in  Michigan
the till is sandier and more elevated and more rolling.  In this area there
are many valley train deposits along courses of glacial  meltwater  streams
which are often underlaid by sand and gravel.

3.1.2.3 SOILS ASSOCIATION — MAUMEE BASIN

     Each of the soil associations of the Maumee Basin is described  below.
Associations  1 through 5 are soils dominantly formed in glacial till.  As-
sociations 6 through 10 are soils predominantly formed  in  water-deposited
material, organic material, eolian material  (see Figure 2).

3.1.2.3.1 Blount-Pewamo
     Depressional  to  gently  sloping,  very  poorly-drained  to  somewhat
poorly-drained  soils that have clayey subsoils.  The landscape in this as-
sociation consists of a glacial-ground moraine that is  nearly  level  with
many  narrow depressions.  This soil formed in glacial till.  This soil as-
sociation occupies about 26 percent of the  watershed.   Blount  soils  are
nearly level and gently sloping and are somewhat poorly-drained.  They have
a surface layer of very dark grayish-brown and dark grayish-brown  loam  or
silt  loam  and a subsoil that is mostly dark-brown and dark grayish-brown,
mottled silty clay and clay.  Pewamo soils are depressional,  nearly  level
and are very poorly-drained.  They have a surface layer of a very dark gray
silty clay loam and a subsoil that is mostly dark  gray  or  grayish-brown,
mottled silty clay or silty clay loam.

3.1.2.3.2 Morley-Blount-Pewamo


     Depressional to moderately steep, very  poorly-drained  to  moderately
well-drained  soils that have clayey subsoils.  The landscape in this asso-
ciation consists of a glacial moraine that  is  gently  rolling  with  some
depressional  areas  near  drainageways.  The soils formed in glacial till.
This soil association occupies about 22 percent of the  watershed.   Morley
soils  are  gently  sloping  to  moderately  steep and are moderately well-
drained. They have a surface layer of very dark grayish-brown and  grayish-
brown silt loam and a subsoil that is mostly dark yellowish-brown and brown
clay and is mottled in the lower part.  Blount soils are nearly  level  and
gently  sloping and are somewhat poorly-drained.  They have a surface layer
of very dark grayish-brown and dark grayish-brown loam or silt loam  and   a
subsoil  that  is  mostly  dark brown and dark grayish-brown, mottled silty
clay and clay.  Pewamo soils are depressional nearly  level  and  are  very
TECHNICAL APPROACH

-------
                                                                        29
 clay or  silty  clay  loam.

 3.1.2.3.3 Miami-Conover
     Nearly level  to moderately  steep, well-drained   and   somewhat  poorly-
drained  soils  that have  loamy  subsoils.  The landscape  in  this  soil associ-
ation  consists of  a glacial  moraine  that  is  gently  rolling with  some
depressional  areas  near  drainageways.  The soils  formed in glacial  till.
This soil  association occupies about  2 percent  of   the watershed.    Miami
soils  are  gently sloping  to moderately steep and  are well drained.  They
have a surface layer of  dark grayish-brown loam and  a subsoil that is  dark
brown  clay loam.  Conover  soils are nearly level and  are somewhat poorly-
drained.   They have a surface  layer of very dark grayish brown  loam  and  a
subsoil  that  is  mostly yellowish-brown and dark yellowish-brown, mottled
clay loam.

3.1.2.3.4  Hillsdale-Fox
     Gently sloping to moderately steep, well-drained soils that have loamy
subsoils.   The  landscape  in  this  soil  association consists of glacial
moraines and valley trains that are rolling with nearly level areas at  the
lower  elevations.  The soils formed in glacial till and outwash.  This as-
sociation occupies about 1 percent of the watershed.  Hillsdale  soils  are
gently  sloping to moderately steep and are well-drained.  They have a sur-
face layer of dark grayish-brown sandy loam and  a  subsoil  that  is  dark
brown  and  dark yellowish-brown sandy loam and sandy clay loam.  Fox soils
are gently sloping to moderately steep and are well drained.  They  have  a
surface  layer  of dark grayish-brown loam and a subsoil that is dark brown
clay loam and gravelly loam.

3.1.2.3.5 Hoytville-Toledo-Nappanee


     Depressional to  gently  sloping,  very  poorly-drained  and  somewhat
poorly-drained soils that have clayey subsoils.  The landscape in this soil
association consists of glacial lake plain and glacial till plain  that  is
dominantly  nearly  level  with  occasional  slight rises.  The few sloping
areas in the landscape are near deeply dissected  streams.   Hoytville  and
Nappanee  soils  formed in glacial till.  Toledo soils formed in lacustrine
sediments.   This  soil  association  occupies  about  17  percent  of  the
watershed.   Hoytville soils are depressional and nearly level and are very
poorly-drained.  They have a surface layer that is  very  dark  gray  silty
clay and a subsoil of dark grayish-brown, mottled silty clay.  Toledo soils
are depressional to level and are very poorly drained.  They have a surface
layer  of  very  dark  gray  silty clay and a subsoil that is dark gray and
gray, mottled silty clay.  Nappanee soils are nearly level to gently  slop-
ing  and  are  somewhat  poorly-drained.  They have a surface layer that is
dark gray and grayish brown silt loam or silty clay loam and a subsoil that
is mostly grayish brown, mottled clay.
                                                     TECHNICAL  APPROACH

-------
 30
                              10
                       LEGEND

      SOILS DOMINATLY FORMED IN GLACIAL TILL

BLOUNT-PEWAMO ASSOCIATION: Depressional to gently sloping,
very poorly drained to somewhat poorly drained soils that have
clayey subsoils.

MORLEY-BLOUNT-PEWAMO ASSOCIATION:  Depressional to
moderately steep, very poorly drained to moderately well-drained
soils that have clayey subsoils.

Ml A Ml-CO MOVER ASSOCIATION:  Nearly level to moderately steep,
well-drained and somewhat poorly drained soils that have loamy sub-
soils.

HILLSDALE-FOX ASSOCIATION: Gently sloping to moderately steep,
well-drained soils that have loamy subsoils.

HOYTVILLE-TOLEDO-NAPPANEE ASSOCIATION:  Depressional to
gently sloping, very poorly drained  and somewhat poorly drained soils
that have clayey subsoils.

    SOILS DOMINANTLY FORMED IN WATER-DEPOSITED
 MATERIAL, ORGANIC MATERIAL, AND EOLIAN MATERIAL

CARLISLE-MONTGOMERY ASSOCIATION: Depressional and nearly
level, very  poorly drained soils that have organic and clayey subsoils.

PAULDING-LATTY-ROSELMS ASSOCIATION: Depressional and
nearly level, very poorly  drained and somewhat poorly drained soils
that have clayey subsoils.

HANEY-BELLMORE-MILLGROVE ASSOCIATION: Depressional to
strongly sloping, very poorly drained, moderately well-drained, and
well-drained soils that have loamy subsoils.

MERMILL-HASKINS-WAUSEON ASSOCIATION:  Depressional and
nearly level, very poorly  drained and somewhat poorly drained soils
that have loamy and clayey subsoils.

OTTOKEE-GRANBY ASSOCIATION: Depressional to sloping, very
poorly drained, poorly drained, moderately well-drained soils that
have sandy subsoils.
                                       Legend  Figure   2
TECHNICAL  APPROACH

-------
                                                                        31
                 Figure  2. Soil Associations - Maumee Basin
poorly-drained.  They have a surface layer of very  dark  gray  silty  clay
loam and a subsoil that is mostly dark gray or grayish-brown,  mottled silty
                                                         TECHNICAL APPROACH

-------
 32


 3.1.2.3.6  Carlisle-Montgomery


      Depressional and nearly level, very poorly-drained soils  that have or-
 ganic and  clayey subsoils.  The landscape  in  this soil association consists
 of a  local lake plain that  is flat and is  surrounded by  a  glacial  ground
 moraine.    Carlisle  soils  formed  in organic materials.  Montgomery soils
 formed in  lacustrine sediments.  This soil association  occupies  about  1
 percent of the watershed.  Carlisle soils are depressional to nearly level
 and are very poorly-drained.  They have a  surface layer of black  muck  and
 underlying  material that is black and dark-reddish brown muck.  Montgomery
 soils are  depressional to nearly level and are very  poorly-drained.   They
 have   a surface  layer of  black silty clay loam and a subsoil that is dark
 gray,  grayish-brown, and gray silty clay loam and silty clay.

 3.1.2.3.7  Paulding-Latty-Roselms


      Depressional  and  nearly  level,  very  poorly-drained  and  somewhat
 poorly-drained soils that have clayey subsoils.  The landscape in this soil
 association consists of a glacial lake plain  that is dominantly nearly lev-
 el  with occasional slight  rises.  A few sloping areas in the landscape are
 near  deeply dissected streams.  The soils  are formed in lacustrine  materi-
 al.    This  soil  association  occupies  about 15 percent of the watershed.
 Paulding soils are nearly level and are  very poorly-drained.   They  have
 surface  layers  that are dark gray clay and  subsoil that is gray and olive
 gray, mottled clay.  Roselms  soils  are   nearly  level  and  are  somewhat
 poorly-drained.  They have  a surface layer of dark gray silty clay loam and
 a  subsoil  that is light gray, brown ,  and  grayish  brown,  mottled  heavy
 clay.

 3.1.2.3.8  Haney-Belmore-Mi1Igrove


     Depressional to  strongly  sloping,  very  poorly-drained,  moderately
well-drained,  and  well-drained  soils  that  have  loamy  subsoils.   The
 landscape  in this soil association consists of long  narrow  sloping  beach
 ridges  rising  above  the  terrain and nearly level glacial deltas and lake
plain.  The soils formed in glacial and beach ridge  deltaic  deposits  and
 lacustrine  sediments.   This soil association occupies about 10 percent of
 the watershed.  Any soil named in this association is more  extensive  than
 the  many  soils of small extent not named.  Although collectively, the Ha-
ney, Belmore, and Millgrove soils do not make up the majority of the  asso-
ciation.   Haney  soils  are  gently sloping and sloping and are moderately
well-drained.  They have a surface layer of dark grayish-brown loam  and  a
subsoil  that  is  dark brown sandy clay loam and gravelly sandy clay loam.
Millgrove  soils are depressional to  nearly  level  and  are  very  poorly-
drained.  They have a surface layer of dark yellowish-brown loam and a sub-
soil that  is dark brown sandy clay loam and gravelly sandy clay loam,  very
dark-grayish-brown  loam  and  a  subsoil  that  is  dark grayish brown and
grayish-brown, mottled sandy loam and sandy clay loam.
TECHNICAL APPROACH

-------
                                                                         33
 3.1.2.3.9 Mermi11-Haskins-Wauseon
     Depressional   and   nearly   level,  very  poorly-drained  and   somewhat
poorly-drained  soils  that have  loamy and clayey subsoils.  The  landscape  in
this soil  association consists  of a glacial lake plain and  glacial ground
moraine  that  are nearly level with depressional areas and some  gently  undu-
lating rises.   The  soils formed in the outwash on glacial  till or lacus-
trine  sediments.   This soil   association occupies about 3 percent of the
watershed.  Mermill soils are depressional and nearly level  and   are  very
poorly-drained.   They   have  a surface layer of very dark gray sandy  loam.
There subsoil is mottled and is dark gray, gray, and grayish-brown.  It   is
a   sandy clay loam  in the upper part and a clay in  the lower part.  Haskins
soils are  nearly level  and are  somewhat poorly-drained.  They have a  sur-
face  layer  of dark  grayish-brown  loam.  The  subsoil is mottled and  is
yellowish-brown and light yellowish-brown.  It is sandy  clay   loam,   sandy
loam, and  loam  in the upper part and light clay in  the lower part.  Wauseon
soils are  depressional  and nearly level and are very poorly-drained.   They
have  a  surface  layer of very dark gray fine sandy loam.  The subsoil  is
mottled  and is  dark gray, grayish-brown, and gray.  It is fine  sandy  loam
in  the upper part and clay in the lower part.

3.1.2.3.10 Ottokee-Granby


     Depressional to  sloping,   very  poorly-drained,  poorly-drained,  and
moderately well-drained soils that have sandy subsoils.  The  landscape  in
this soil  association consists  of beach ridges that are nearly  level  with
gently   undulating  rises.  The soils formed in water-laid and  eolian  sedi-
ments.   This association occupies about 3 percent of  the  watershed.   Ot-
tokee soils are gently  sloping  and sloping and are moderately well  drained.
They have  a surface layer of very dark grayish-brown loamy fine sand and  a
subsoil  that   is   light yellowish-brown and yellowish brown, mottled  loamy
fine sand.  Granby  soils are depressional and nearly  level  and   are  very
poorly-drained.   They   have a  surface layer of black loamy sand and a sub-
soil that  is dark gray  and light brownish gray, mottled sand.

3.1.2.4  SOILS OF BLACK  CREEK WATERSHED

     The Black Creek  study area comprises a drainage area of  approximately
18.8  square  miles  (12,038  acres)  in northeastern Allen County,  Indiana.
The watershed is about  13 miles northeast of Ft. Wayne.  Black  Creek  ori-
ginates  about  2   miles north of  the community of Harlan and flows in a
south-southeasterly direction for about 4 miles, where it turns to  an  eas-
terly  direction  for   about  2  miles.   Thence,  after a number of abrupt
changes  in direction  the creek  flows southward for about 1-1/2 miles to the
Maumee   River.   Black  Creek is an entrenched stream throughout most of its
course particularly in  the lowermost 2 miles when it flows about 25  to  30
feet  below  the  general  level of the lacustrine plain.  Principal tribu-
taries are Smith-Fry Drain, Wertz  Drain,  Reichelderfer  Drain  and  Upper
Gorrell  Drain (see  Figure 3).

     The mean annual rainfall at Fort Wayne is 35.31 inches.   The  rainfall
is  well distributed throughout the year, with the month of December having
the least  (2.09 in.) and the month of June having the most (4.17 in.).   The
mean  annual  temperature  is 50.3 degrees Fahrenheit with a mean July tem-


                                                     TECHNICAL APPROACH

-------
34
            LEGEND
   Study Area Boundary
   Highway
   Road
   Creek or Drain
   Town
                        Figure 3. Black Creek Watershed
TECHNICAL APPROACH

-------
                                                                         35
 perature of 74.2 degrees and a mean January temperature of 27 degrees.

      The altitude of the watershed ranges from about 710 to 850 feet  above
 mean  sea  level,  a maximum relief on the order of 140 feet.  Local relief
 ranges from a fraction of a foot on portions of the lacustrine plain to  as
 much  as 40 to 50 feet in the northernmost part of the watershed and in the
 entrenched portion of Black Creek near the Maumee River.

      The Black Creek study area is largely  within  the  Maumee  lacustrine
 plain  (see  Figure 4).  Surficial deposits consist largely of wave-scoured
 lakebottom till.  A narrow (about 1,000 foot)  band of beach  and  shoreline
 deposits parallels Indiana Route 37 through the watershed.  These shoreline
 deposits are bordered on the northwest by glacial till end-moraine deposits
 and to the southeast by a rather narrow (approximately I mile wide)  band of
 lacustrine sands which  grade  into  the  wave-scoured  lake-bottom  tills.
 Bedrock consists of Devonian limestone and dolomite generally less than 100
 feet deep.
FT. WAYNE
            \
              \
                       Figure 4.  Location of  Study Area
      The Black Creek Watershed area is entirely rural except for the  small
 unincorporated community of Harlan, which is located along Indiana Route 37
 in the west central portion of the watershed.  Land ownership is character-
                                                   TECHNICAL APPROACH

-------
 36
 ized  by  numerous  small  holdings.   There  are  176 individual ownership
 tracts, of which 127 or 72% are less than 100 acres, 45  or  26%  are  from
 100-249  acres, and only 4 (2%) are 250 acres or larger.  The average value
 of land and buildings is approximately $1,400 per acre.

      The proximity of the watershed to Ft. Wayne provides excellent  oppor-
 tunities  for employment in needy industry and results in high off-farm em-
 ployment.  It is estimated that nearly 2/3 of the farm operators  work  off
 the  farm.   Of those operators who have off-farm employment, approximately
 20% work less than 100 days off the farm, and 80% work more than  100  days
 off the farm.

      The average market value of agricultural products sold is approximate-
 ly  $27,000  per  farm.   This  is  about  equally  divided between the two
 categories of cash crops and livestock, poultry and livestock  and  poultry
 products.

      Each of the soil associations are described below:
 (See Figure 5)

 3.1.2.4.1 Blount-Morley-Pewamo

      Depressional to moderately  steep,  very  poorly-to  moderately  well-
 drained soils that have clayey subsoils;  on uplands.   The landscape in this
 association consists of glacial-ground moraine and moraine that  is  nearly
 level  with many narrow depressions and is gently rolling with some depres-
 sional areas near drainageways.  The soils formed in  glacial  till.   This
 soil association occupies about 36 percent of the watershed.   About 39 per-
 cent is made up of Blount soils, 38 percent of Morley soils,  16 percent  of
 Pewamo  soils,  and 7 percent of minor soils.   Blount soils are nearly level
 and gently sloping and are somewhat poorly-drained.   They  have  a  surface
 layer  of  very dark grayish-brown and dark grayish-brown loam or silt loam
 and subsoil that is mostly dark brown and dark grayish-brown, mottled silty
 clay and clay.   Morley soils are gently sloping to moderately steep and are
 moderately well-drained.  They have a surface layer of very  dark  grayish-
 brown  and  grayish  brown  silt  loam  and  a  subsoil that  is mostly dark
 yellowish-brown and brown clay and is mottled in the  lower  part.    Pewamo
 soils  are depressional and nearly level  and are very poorly-drained.   They
 have a surface  layer of very dark gray silty clay loam and a   subsoil  that
 is  mostly  dark  gray  or  grayish-brown,  mottled silty clay or silty clay
 loam.

 3.1.2.4.2 Shoals-Eel

      Nearly level,  somewhat poorly-and moderately well-drained  soils  that
 have loamy subsoils;  on bottom lands.   The  landscape  in this  association is
 nearly level flood  plains that are adjacent to streams.   The   soils  formed
 in  alluvium.    This  soil  association  occupies  about  5  percent of the
 watershed.   About 44 percent  is made up of  the Shoals soils,  29 percent  of
 Eel  soils,   and  27 percent  of minor  soils.   Shoals  soils are nearly level
 and are somewhat poorly-drained.   They have a surface layer  of  dark  gray
 and  dark  grayish-brown  silty  clay loam  and a subsoil  that is gray silty
 clay loam.   Eel  soils are nearly level and  are  moderately   well-drained.
 They  have  a  surface layer  of dark grayish-brown and dark brown silt loam
 and loam and a  subsoil that is  brown  and  dark  yellowish-brown,   mottled
 light silty clay loam.
TECHNICAL APPROACH

-------
                                                                        37
3.1.2.4.3 Hoytville-Nappanee

     Depressional and nearly level, very poorly-and somewhat poorly-drained
soils  that  have  clayey subsoils; on uplands.  The landscape in this soil
association consists of glacial till plain that is dominantly nearly  level
with occasional slight rises.  The soils formed in glacial till.  This soil
association occupies about 29 percent of the watershed.  About  48  percent
is made up of Hoytville soils, 23 percent of Nappanee soils, and 21 percent
of minor soils.  The Hoytville soils are depressional and nearly level  and
are  very poorly-drained.  They have a surface layer that is very dark gray
silty clay and a subsoil of dark grayish-brown, mottled silty  clay.   Nap-
panee  soils are nearly level and are somewhat poorly-drained.  They have a
surface layer that is dark gray and grayish-brown silt loam or  silty  clay
loam and a subsoil that is mostly grayish-brown, mottled clay.

3.1.2.4.4 Rensselaer-Whitaker-Oshtemo

     Nearly level to moderately sloping, very poorly, somewhat poorly,  and
somewhat  excessively-drained  soils  that have loamy subsoils; on uplands.
The landscape in this soil association  consists  of  long  narrow  sloping
beach  ridges  above  the  terrain and nearly level glacial deltas and lake
plain.  The soils formed in glacial deltaic and beach  ridge  deposits  and
lacustrine  sediments.   This soil association occupies about 25 percent of
the watershed.  About 28 percent is made up of Rensselaer soils, 21 percent
of  Whitaker  soils,  6  percent  of Oshtemo soils, and 45 percent of minor
soils.  Rensselaer soils are nearly level  and  are  very  poorly  drained.
They  have a surface layer of very dark brown loam, loam to silty clay loam
or mucky silty clay loam this is mottled in the lower part.  The subsoil is
mostly  gray  or strong-brown, mottled sandy loam or sandy clay loam.  Whi-
taker soils are nearly level and are somewhat poorly drained.  They have  a
surface  layer of fine sandy loam, loam, or silt loam that is dark grayish-
brown in the upper part and pale brown in the lower part.  The  subsoil  is
yellowish-brown  and  gray,  mottled clay loam or silty clay loam.  Oshtemo
soils are nearly level to moderately sloping and are  somewhat  excessively
drained.   They have a surface layer that is dark-brown sandy loam or grav-
elly sandy loam.

3.1.2.4.5 Haskins, Hoytville

     Depressional to  gently  sloping,  somewhat  poorly-and  very  poorly-
drained  soils  that  have  loamy  and  clayey  subsoils;  on uplands.  The
landscape in this soil association consists of glacial-ground moraine  that
is  nearly  level with depressional areas and some gently undulating rises.
Haskins soils formed in outwash on glacial till.  Hoytville soils formed in
glacial  till.   This  soil  association  occupies  about 5 percent of this
watershed.  About 34 percent is made up of Haskins  soils,  31  percent  of
Hoytville  soils,  and 35 percent of minor soils.  Haskins soils are nearly
level or gently sloping and are somewhat poorly-drained.  They have a  sur-
face  layer  of  dark  grayish-brown  loam.   The subsoil is mottled and is
yellowish-brown and light yellowish brown.  It is loam or sandy loam in the
upper  part  and light clay in the lower part.  Hoytville soils are depres-
sional and nearly level and are very poorly-drained.  They have  a  surface
layer  that  is  very  dark  gray silty clay and a subsoil of dark grayish-
brown, mottled silty clay.
                                                         TECHNICAL APPROACH

-------
38
Figure 5. Soil Associations — Black Creek Watershed
TECHNICAL APPROACH

-------
                                                                                    39
                            LEGEND

BLOUNT-MORLEY-PEWAMO ASSOCIATION: Depressional to moderately steep,
very poorly drained to moderately well-drained soils that have clayey subsoils;
on uplands.
SHOALS-EEL ASSOCIATION: Nearly level, somewhat poorly drained and moder-
ately well-drained soils that have loamy subsoils; on bottom lands.

HOYTVILLE-NAPPANEE ASSOCIATION:  Depressional and nearly level, very
poorly drained and somewhat poorly drained soils that have clayey subsoils; on
uplands.
RENSSELAER-WHITAKER-OSHTEMO ASSOCIATION: Nearly level to moderately
sloping, very poorly drained, somewhat poorly drained, and somewhat excessively
drained soils that have loamy subsoils; on uplands.
HASKINS-HOYTVILLE ASSOCIATION:  Depressional to gently sloping, somewhat
poorly drained and very poorly drained soils that have loamy and clayey subsoils;
on uplands.
              Legend  Figure  5
                                                     TECHNICAL  APPROACH

-------
40
3.1.3 Land Capability Units

     The land capability unit represents a grouping of  soils  which  share
common  limitations  for agricultural uses and which respond to like treat-
ment under similar conditions of use.  There are 58 different kinds of soil
in  the Black Creek study area.  These soils make up a total of 21 Land Ca-
pability Units which are used in determining land treatment needs  (see Fig-
ure 6).

3.1.3.1 CAPABILITY UNIT I-I

This unit consists of deep,  nearly  level,  well-drained,  medium-textured
soils of the Martinsville and Rawson series.  These soils have moderate in-
filtration and permeability and a high available moisture capacity.   These
soils  are  productive  and  easy to manage and can be cropped intensively.
The proper use of crop residue maintains the content of organic matter  and
helps to keep good tilth.

3.1.3.2 CAPABILITY UNIT L-2^

This unit consists of  deep,  nearly  level,  well-drained  and  moderately
well-drained,  medium  textured soils of the Eel and Genesee series.  These
soils are flooded  occasionally  in  the  winter  and  spring.   They  have
moderate  infiltration and permeability and high available moisture capaci-
ty.

3.1.3.3 CAPABILITY UNIT IIE-1

This unit consists of deep, gently sloping,  well-drained,  medium-textured
soils.   These  soils  are  of  the Martinsville, Miami, and Rawson series.
They have moderate infiltration and permeability and high  available  mois-
ture capacity.  Erosion control is the main management need.  Contour farm-
ing, diversion terraces,  sod  waterways,  and  proper  crop  rotation  and
minimum tillage are among the measures that can be used to control erosion.

3.1.3.4 CAPABILITY UNIT IIE-6

This unit  consists  of  deep,  gently  sloping,  moderately  well-drained,
medium-textured  soils of the Morley series.  These soils have moderate in-
filtration, slow permeability, and high available moisture capacity.  Their
natural fertility is moderate.  Their content of organic matter is general-
ly moderate or low.  Erosion  is  a  hazard,  particularly  in  intensively
cropped fields.  Diversion ditches, contour tillage, stripcropping, and sod
waterways are among the measures needed for control of erosion.  Crop resi-
due  and  intercrops  help to maintain and increase the organic-matter con-
tent.  Minimum tillage helps to maintain good tilth  and  control  erosion.
Wet  spots created by springs or by seepage can be drained with random tile
lines.

3.1.3.5 CAPABILITY UNIT IIE-9

This unit consists of gently sloping, well-drained  soils  of  the  Belmore
series.  These soils are moderately deep and deep to gravel and sand.  They
have moderately rapid infiltration,  moderate  permeability,  and  moderate
available moisture capacity.  Erosion is a hazard.  Contour farming and sod
waterways are among the measures needed for  control  of  erosion.   Proper
management of crop residue is important in maintaining  the  organic-matter
content.
TECHNICAL APPROACH

-------
                                                                        41
3.1.3.6 CAPABILITY UNIT IIS-1

This unit consists of nearly level, well-drained, medium-textured soils  of
the  Belmore  series.   These soils are moderately deep to gravel and sand.
They  have  moderately  rapid  infiltration,  moderate  permeability,   and
moderate  available  moisture capacity.  Droughtiness is a major limitation
and crop residues should be left on the soil to maintain and increases  the
content of organic matter.

3.1.3.7 CAPABILITY UNIT IIW-1

This unit consists of deep, level and  depressional,  very  poorly-drained,
dark-colored,  medium-textured  to fine-textured soils.  These soils are of
the Brookston, Hoytsville, Lenawee, Mermill, Pewamo, Rensselaer, Washtenaw,
and Westland series.  They are waterlogged in periods of wet weather.  They
have moderate infiltration, slow permeability,  and  high  available  water
capacity.   Wetness is the main limitation.  An adequate drainage system is
needed if the common crops are to be grown.  Diversion terraces that inter-
cept runoff from adjacent uplands are beneficial.  Sod outlets or structur-
al outlets for the diversion terraces are needed.  Spring tillage should be
delayed  until  the  plow  layer  is dry.  Minimum tillage and crop residue
management help to maintain good tilth.

3.1.3.8 CAPABILITY UNIT IIW-2

This unit consists of  deep,  nearly  level  and  gently  sloping  somewhat
poorly-drained,  medium-textured or moderately coarse textured soils of the
Blount, Crosby, Del Rey, Raskins, and Whitaker series.   These  soils  have
moderately  slow or slow permeability and high available moisture capacity.
The gently sloping areas are erodible.  Wetness is the main limitation.  An
adequate  drainage  system  is  needed if the common crops are to be grown.
Diversion terraces that intercept runoff from higher areas are  beneficial.
Grass  waterways  are  needed.   Other practices needed include minimum and
properly timed tillage and management of crop residues.

3.1.3.9 CAPABILITY UNIT IIW-7

This unit consists of  nearly  level,  somewhat  poorly  drained  and  very
poorly-drained  soils  of the Shoals series.  These soils are flooded occa-
sionally, and they have a fluctuating water table.  They have moderate  in-
filtration  and permeability and high available moisture capacity.  Wetness
is the main limitation.  Adequate  drainage  is  important.   Other  needed
practices  include  conservation  cropping systems, crop residue management
and minimum tillage.

3.1.3.10 CAPABILITY UNIT IIIE-1

This unit consists  of  deep,  moderately  sloping,  well-drained,  medium-
textured  soils  of  the  Martinsville and Rawson series.  These soils have
moderate infiltration, moderate permeability, and high  available  moisture
capacity.   Erosion  is the main hazard.  Contouring is the erosion control
practice most applicable on the short slopes.  On the few longer  and  more
uniform slopes, stripcropping can be used. Sod waterways are needed to con-
trol erosion in drainageways.
                                                     TECHNICAL  APPROACH

-------
 42
          Figure 6. Land Capabilities Units — Black Creek Watershed
TECHNICAL APPROACH

-------
                                                                                                43
                                           LEGEND

              CLASS I     Land has few hazards that limit its use. It is nearly level, deep,
              generally well-drained and suited for intensive cultivation with good management.

      	1    CLASS I Iw   Land is very good cropland but has wetness hazards which may be
 11            overcome with proper installation of drainage practices and use of conservation
      '        management systems.

      ^r-r^i    CLASS He   Land is very good cropland but has erosion hazards which may be
  I IP £^^1    easi'y overcome with proper installation of practices and conservation manage-
      LiiJ    ment systems.

      IPJ.PI    CLASS Illw  Land is good cropland but has severe wetness hazards that will
111    loo'j    require careful soil management, and installation of more intensive drainage
IIIW \/fA    systems to be good cropland. The hazards may  limit the intensity  and choice of
              cultivated crops.

      __    CLASS Hie   Land is good cropland but severe wind and/or erosion hazards
11 I           may 'im't the intensitY of use and ch°ice of crops. Carefully selected conserva-
11 I 6 Mmi    tjon practices must be considered in use of this land for crops. The sandy soils
              also have a droughty hazard.

      • •.;.;.•.•»    CLASS Ills   Land is considered good cropland  but droughtiness is a severe
 111   F&Wa    hazard. Careful soil management including irrigation may be considered in the
      *  i™    use of this land for crops.

      moat    CLASS I Ve   Land has very severe erosion hazard due to slope which limits
I\/P FWWI    'ts use  ^or cu't'vatec' crops. It requires very careful management including
      •*""'    special conservation practices when cultivated.
                          Legend    Figure  6
                                                        TECHNICAL  APPROACH

-------
44

3.1.3.11 CAPABILITY UNIT IIIE-6

This  unit  consists  of  deep,  gently  sloping  and  moderately  sloping,
moderately well-drained, medium-textured soils of the Morley series.  These
soils range from uneroded to severely eroded.  They have moderate infiltra-
tion,  slow permeability, and high available moisture capacity.  Erosion  is
a hazard, particularly  in intensively cropped fields.   Diversion  ditches,
contour  tillage,  stripcropping, sod waterways, crop residue management and
minimum  tillage are among the measures needed for control of erosion.

3.1.3.12 CAPABILITY UNIT IIIE-9

This unit consists of Fox loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, moderately   eroded,
a   well-drained soil.   This soil is moderately deep to sand and gravel.   It
has moderate  permeability and moderate available moisture  capacity.   This
soil occurs as small areas, many of which  are managed along with less slop-
ing soils that can be used more intensively.   As  a  result,  considerable
erosion  has  taken  place.   Erosion is the main hazard.  Contour  tillage,
minimum  tillage, mulch  tillage, and a suitable cropping system help to con-
trol erosion.

3.1.3.13 CAPABILITY UNIT IIIE-11

This unit consists of deep, gently sloping, well-drained soils of   the  St.
Clair   series.  These soils range from uneroded to moderately  eroded.  They
have moderate infiltration, slow permeability, and high available   moisture
capacity.  Erosion is the main hazard.  Maintaining good tilth and  increas-
 ing the  content or organic matter are  problems.   Diversion   terraces  and
contour   tillage  help to control runoff and erosion.  Permanent grassed wa-
 terways  are  needed to prevent gullying of  natural  drainageways.    Minimum
 tillage, a  suitable cropping  system,  and proper use of crop residue help  to
 improve tilth and to increase the content  of  organic matter.

 3.1.3.14 CAPABILITY UNIT IIIE-13

 This unit consists of deep, gently  sloping and  moderately sloping, well-
 drained  and somewhat excessively drained, moderately coarse  textured soils
 for the Belmore and Oshtemo series.   These soils  have moderately rapid   in-
 filtration,   moderate   and moderately rapid  permeability,  and  low available
 moisture capacity.  Erosion is the  main hazard,  and droughtiness is a seri-
 ous limitation.   Contour tillage, crop residue management, and minimum til-
 lage help to control erosion.

 3.1.3.15 CAPABILITY UNIT IIIS-2

 This unit consists of  deep,   nearly  level,   somewhat  excessively-drained
 moderately  coarse  textured soils  of the Oshtemo series.   These soils have
 moderately rapid  infiltration and  permeability and low  available  moisture
 capacity.  Droughtiness is the main limitation to use.

 3.1.3.16 CAPABILITY UNIT IIIW-2

 This unit consists  of  deep,  nearly  level,  very  poorly-drained,  dark-
 colored,  moderately fine textured or fine textured soils of the Montgomery
 series.  These soils become waterlogged in periods of wet weather  and  are
 slow to dry  out in spring.  They have very slow infiltration and permeabil-


 TECHNICAL  APPROACH

-------
                                                                        45
 ity and high available water  capacity.  Wetness  is   the   major  limitation.
 Maintaining   good  tilth is  a  problem.   An adequate  drainage system is need-
 ed.   It is necessary to keep  tillage  to a minimum.   Crop residue management
 in the cropping  system is needed.

 3.1.3.17 CAPABILITY  UNIT IVE-6

 This unit consists  of  deep,  moderately  sloping   and   strongly  sloping,
 moderately well-drained, medium-textured  and moderately  fine textured soils
 of the Morley series.   These  soils  have been eroded so   severely  that  the
 present  surface  layer  consists almost  entirely of material from the sub-
 soil.   They  have slow to moderate infiltration,  slow permeability,  and high
 available moisture capacity.  Erosion is  the main hazard.   Contour  cultiva-
 tion,  diversion  terraces, and sod waterways help to control runoff  and ero-
 sion.    Crop  residue management and minimum tillage also improve tilth and
 reduce runoff.

 3.1.3.18 CAPABILITY  UNIT IVE-11

 This unit consists of St. Clair silty clay loam,  6  to 12  percent   slopes,
 moderately   eroded,   a  deep, well-drained or moderately well-drained soil.
 This soil has moderate infiltration, slow permeability,  and high available
 moisture capacity.    Erosion is the main hazard.   Permanent sod in natural
 drainageways helps to  control gully erosion.    Contour   cultivation,   crop
 residue  management,   and  minimum  tillage are  effective in the control of
 runoff and erosion.

 3.1.3.19 CAPABILITY  UNIT IVE-1

 This unit consists of  deep, nearly  level  and gently  sloping  well-drained,
 coarse-textured  soils  of  the  Plainfield series.   These soils have rapid
 permeability and low available moisture-holding  capacity.   Droughtiness is
 the  main limitation.   Crop  residue management minimum tillage and cover
 crops,  help  to control wind erosion.

 3.1.3.20 CAPABILITY  UNIT VIE-1

 This unit consists of  deep, strongly sloping, severely   eroded,   moderately
 well-drained, medium-textured soils of  the Morley series.   These soils have
 slow to moderate infiltration, slow permeability, and high available   mois-
 ture capacity.   The  soils are too steep and too erodible to be suitable for
 cultivation,  except what is necessary for  the  establishment of permanent
 pasture.   Erosion  is  the main hazard.   A vegetative cover  and protection
 from overgrazing help  to control erosion.

     Major land  uses in  the Black Creek Study Area  include  cropland,   80.7
 percent;  grassland,   4.3  percent; woodland, 7.1 percent;  wildlife and  re-
 creation, 2.7 percent; urban and built-up,  3.6 percent and   farmstead,   1.6
 percent.   Lands categorized as urban and  built-up  include  the acreages  oc-
 cupied  by the town of  Harlan as well as county  roads,   highways,  schools,
 and  cemeteries.  Table  3 shows present acreage for each capability unit in
 the Black Creek Study  Area.

     The pattern of land use is expected to remain relatively  stable  over
 the next  five years.   However, some minor changes can be anticipated as  in-
dicated by recent trends and in response to planned land  use.   It  is  es-
                                                     TECHNICAL APPROACH

-------
46
                                   TABLE 3
            Soils Data By Land Capability  - Black Creek Study Area
    Land
 Capability
    Unit

 1-1
 1-2
 IIe-1
 IIe-6
 IIe-9
 Ils-l
 IIw-1
 IIw-2
 IIw-7
 IIIe-1
 IIIe-6
 IIIe-9
 IIIe-11
 IIIe-13
 IIIs-2
 IIIw-2
 IIIw-6
 IVe-6
 IVe-11
 IVs-1
 VIe-1
 TOTAL
 Acres    Major Soils Series

   48     Martinsville,  Rawson
  239     Eel, Genesee
  206     Martinsville,  Miami, Rawson
 1299     Morely
   10     Belmore
    3     Belmore
 4435     Pewamo, Hoytville, Brookston
 3698     Blount, Crosby,  Haskins
  384     Shoals
    3     Martinsville,  Rawson
  127     Morley
    5     Fox
   50     St. Clair
  171     Belmore, Oshtemo
  102     Oshtemo
    3     Montgomery
 1074     Nappanee
  137     Morley
   24     St. Clair
    5     Plainfield
   15     Morley
12038
Major Hazard

None
Flooding
Erosion
Erosion
Erosion
Droughtiness
Wetness
Wetness
Wetness
Erosion
Erosion
Erosion
Erosion
Erosion, Droughtiness
Droughtiness
Wetness
Wetness
Erosion
Erosion
Droughtiness
Erosion
 timated that urban and built-up acreage will increase by 118 acres as  some
 of the better-drained woodland and cropland along county roads and highways
 are converted to residential use.  A net decrease of 143 acres of  cropland
 and  70  acres of woodland is projected.  The acreage used for wildlife and
 recreation should increase by 118 acres.
TECHNICAL APPROACH

-------
                                                                             47
3.2 DESIGN OF LAND TREATMENT

     The specific goals of the Black Creek project for treatment of land in
the  watershed  were established during the development of the work plan in
late 1972 and early 1973.

     The concept then was that no traditional practice of soil conservation
should  be  eliminated  from  the  plan  so  that each would receive a fair
evaluation as to its potential impact on water quality.  In all,  33  prac-
tices were specified for cost-sharing and potential application in the pro-
ject.

     These practices and the goals established for  them  are  reported  in
Table 4, which is based on Table A-10 of the original work plan.

     Assignment of quantities of practice within the general  framework  of
the project was based largely on the experience of members of the state and
local offices of the Soil Conservation Service.  Personnel drew heavily  on
experience  in  the design of small watershed projects and on experience in
previous programs of accelerated land treatment.

     In fact, the practices described in Table 4, cover a variety  of  con-
servation  purposes,  a  point  which is developed more completely later in
this report.  In general, practices can be classified as:

(a) those which primarily affect water quality,
(b) those which primarily result in protection of the soil resource,
(c) those which primarily lead to increased crop production, and
(d) those which primarily fulfill other conservation purposes.

     A decision not to attempt to classify practices in this manner at  the
beginning  of  the project, although most project personnel were aware that
practices could be so classified, represented both lack  of  experience  in
developing  plans primarily aimed at improved water quality and a desire to
give each practice a fair evaluation.

     In fact, none of the four categories, listed above can fairly  be  la-
beled as undesirable categories and the relative importance of each must be
considered in planning a program for a specific watershed.  In some  cases,
practices  are  complementary.   In  other  cases,  there may be a conflict
between opposing uses, e:.cj., it may not be possible to achieve both maximum
water quality and maximum crop production simultaneously.

     Similarly, while it may be desirable to consider all  four  categories
when  designing  land  treatment for a specific watershed, policy decisions
may suggest that funds or technical assistance necessary to carry out  cer-
tain practices be obtained from varying sources.  This point is also furth-
er developed in Section   5,1.

3.2.1 Role of SCS

     The Soil Conservation Service of the U.S.  Department  of  Agriculture
has  been responsible for technical assistance to landowners and to the Al-
len County SWCD during the Black Creek project.  This assistance has  taken
the  form of both planning assistance — the overall plan for watershed ap-

                                                        TECHNICAL APPROACH

-------
                                                                                                                            00
M
O
n
1
                                                           TABLE 4
                                    Land Treatment Goals and Estimated Installation Costs
Land Trent -lent Goals an] r.st ir.ir te J Installation Hosts YEARLY c;3/\LS AND PROJfrT 1 NGTALLAT 1 ON COSTS (HOLLARS)
1 tc.-.i
Land Adequately Treated
Cropland to Grassland
Cropland to Woodlnn.1
Cropland to Wildlife "i Rcc.
Cropland to Other
District Cooperators
|j i s t r i c t Cooperators
Conservation Plans
Conservation Plans
Conservation Plans Revised
Lonservation Plans Revised
Conservation Cropping System
uon tou r Fa n i i ng
Critical 'irea Planting
Crop Residue f'anaf;erien t
Diversions
Farmstead '\ Feedlot Wi ndb reaks
Field Border
Field 1,'indb real-
Grade Stab i 1 i zat i on Structures
Grassed Waterway or Outlet
Molding Ponds u Tanks
Land SMOG t h i nt^
Livestock Exclusion
Livestock Watering Facility
ii i n i nium Till ajie
Pasture "> llayland Management
Pasture a Hayland Planting
Pond
I'rotection During Development
Recreation Area Improvement
Sediment Control Basin
Stream Channe 1 3 tab i 1 i zat i on ( 1 )
Stream Channel S tab i 1 i zat i on t 2 )
Streambank Protection
Str i pcroppi n^
Surface Drains
Terraces, Gradient
Terraces Parallel
Tile Urai ns (3 )
Tree Planting
Wildlife Habitat Management
Woodland .Improved Harvesting
Woodland Improvement
Wood! and Prun i n^
SUBTOTAL
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE (SCS)
TOTAL INSTALLATION COSTS
I'n i t
Ac.
\c.
\r.
Ac.
Ac.
do .
Ac.
Mo.
Ac .
do .
Ac.
Ac.
Ac.
\c .
v~.
Ft.
Ac.
Ft.
Ft.
[Jo.
Ac.
do .
\c.
\c.
'] n ,
Ac.
Ac.
Ac.
'lo.

Ac .
ilo.
Ft.
Ft.
Ft.
Ac .
Ft.
Ft.
Ft.
Ft.
Ac.
Ac.
Ac.
Ac.
Ac.



Goal
1 ') , 5 7 3
li
11
nil
35
11(8
7,71* 7
170
10, CM
C
1 , U It J
7,I*1C
7b'J
13
7 , VJ 1
39,230
75
288,320
12,030
368
Go
11
330
215
28
7, CSC
1(02
501
39
118
J- ._
6
00,00"
6,000
122,000
300
"0, 500
11,000
11,000
200,300
10
222
200
610
50



Hn i t
Price <











1.50
2.0"
l)0o!oo
1.5"
0. 50
S3. 00
0,3n
".05
5nO. 0"
it 5 0 . 0 0
5, bOO.O"
75.0"
20.. 00
200.0"
G.5"
1 Z . 0 0
70.0"
2,500.00
100.00
200.00
5,000.00
0.50
C . 0 0
2.00
5.00
O.UO
0.25
0. 75
O.UO
80.00
70.00
15.00
20.00
30.00



Total
Tost











11,127
1,53T
i(,000
1 1 , 2 3 r
1 0 , f, " 0
r. , 0 " 0
f. r. , ii 9 G
roo
l£ii,0"0
30,G"0
G1,CO"
22,5""
i*,300
5 , G " 0
i! 0 , 7 G i»
7,23r
35,07"
97,5"0
11, ""0
2, 1*0"
3", 00"
1)5,000
3 G , 0 0 0
2'ii.,000
1,500
36,200
2,750
8,250
CO, 120
800
15,51(0
3,000
12,2"0
1,500
1,169,027
197, 3G1)
1 , 3 G 7 , 1 9 1
Oct. 72-Oct. 73
Goa 1
b/1




ItO
2, OJl*
lu
1,002
3
520
GOO
-
1
coo
2,uOO
-
25,000
-
30
j
1
-
20
2
300
20
50
2
3
-
C
3,000
-
10,000
-
3, 000
-
lu, Obo
-
-
20
20
10



Cost











900
-
'iOO
900
1,3"0
-
7,500
-
15,000
I 5 0
,, uOO
-
1)00
It 00
1,950
3GO
3,500
5,000
300
-
30,000
1,500
_
20,000
-
1,200
-
6,1,27
-
-
300
itOO
300
107,687
UG,500
15it,187
Oct. 73-Qct. 71;
(,oal
2,612
14

20
S
GJ
2 , 1 It 1
53
3,317
3
520
1,978
205
2
1 , 3 'J 7
10,000
21
5 1 , S C C
3,199
si;
18
9
80
1*7
5
2, OUl
£7
121*
8
28
3

23,591*
2,000
32,525
SO
21*, 127
2,933
2,933
50^360
3
59
1*0
11*3
10

(it)

Cost











2,9G7
1*10
800
2,995
5, 000
1,680
15,560
ICO
l)lt, 000
8,100
11,200
6,000
91*0
1,003
13, 2G6
1,566
8,G80
20,000
2,SOO
GOO

11,797
12,000
65,050
1*00
9,G51
733
2,200
20'!!*!*
21*0
l),130
GOO
2,S60
300
277,829
36,81)3
31.',, 672
Oct. 7.')-Oct . 75
Goal
3,533

10
29
11
29
1,538
57
3,589


2,637
273
i*
2,663
13,500
28
1 0 2 , 1) £ 8
1*,2G5
117
21*
1*
107
Gb
q
2,722
11*3
165
11*
1*2
i*

31,1)58
2,000
1*3,365
105
32,170
3,91"
3,911
68^360
1*
79
71)
217
13



Cost











3,955
5iiG
1,GQO
3,995
6,750
2, 2i|0
3 0 , 7 1* 7
213
58,500
10,800
22,1*00
8,025
1,320
1,800
17,691*
2,571)
11,550
35,000
1*,200
800

15,729
12,000
86,730
525
12,8GC
978
2,933
2 7 ', 3 1| 1*
320
5,530
1,110
l*,3!*0
390
395, 50G
55,291
1*50,797
Oct. 75-Oct.76
Goal
3,757


1(5
1C
19
977
'*!*
2,733


2,203
291
3
2,231
13,100
26
108, 9GG
2,536
133
17
1*
113
82
12
2,593
152
162
15
1*5
5
_
31,91,8 '
2,000
36,110
115
31,203
l*,157
1*, 1 56
G5'512
3
81)
66
230
17



Cost











3,305
582
1,200
3,31)6
R,550
2,080
32,6"9
227
G6,50"
7,650
22,1)00
8,1)75
1,61)0
2,1*00
16,851*
2,736
11,31*0
37,500
l),500
1,000
_
15,971)
12,000
72,220
575
12,l*,"l
1,039
3 117
26^205
21*0
5,880
990
1* , G 0 0
510
388,805
1*5,705
1)31*, 510
Oct.76-0ct.77
Goal















































Cost













































15,025
13,025

-------
                                                                        49

 plication,  individual conservation plans,  etc.  — and technical engineering
 assistance, j^js.,  the design of practices  to be applied.

      Over the five years of the project, SCS estimates  that  22,793  man-
 hours  were applied to the Black Creek project.   Of these hours,  14,509 in-
 volved planning or engineering  assistance.   This further  can be broken down
 into  6,099   for planning time,  4,400  hours  in  application,  and 3,577 hours
 of planning and application on  projects which involved more  than  one  lan-
 downer.  The  balance represents administration  and special sources.

      Planners developed 133 individual conservation  plans  for  landowners
 during the project.   This breaks down  to about  46 hours per  plan or  a cost,
 based on reimbursement to SCS,  of nearly $340 per plan.

      These time and cost figures are critical to understanding  the approach
 taken  to planning for improved water  quality in the Black Creek  Watershed.
 Individual conservation plans served as the  basis for contracts  with  lan-
 downers  and  resulted in the "total approach" of the Black Creek  project  as
 opposed to a  less  coordinated "practice-at-a-time" approach  which has  been
 criticized in other  areas.

      More detail on costs of technical assistance by SCS  is  included in the
 section of report  on costs.

 3.2.2 Procedures of  the SWCD Board

      Soil and Water  Conservation Districts have  cooperated with county ASCS
 Committees  for  many  years in  allocating funds for soil conservation pro-
 grams under USDA projects.   In  the  case of the Black Creek  project,   funds
 were  controlled   directly by the Soil Conservation District.   Cost  sharing
 rates were flexible,  subject only to the requirement that the federal share
 of  the total  project not exceed  75  percent of the total project cost.

      As a result,  an early responsibility of the Board of Supervisors was
 to   establish cost   sharing rates for practices to be  applied  during the
 Black Creek project.   In order  to do this, the Board ranked  project  goals
 as   easy,  normal,  moderately   difficult,   difficult or very  difficult  to
 achieve.  The initial  rankings,  as  determined by the Board,  are  listed  in
 Table 5.

      Cost-share rates  were based on this evaluation.   Higher rates were set
 on   practices which,  it was  assumed, would be difficult to convince  farmers
 to  use.   In general,  the initial determination of the Board of  Supervisors
 proved  to be  accurate.   There were  exceptions, however.   For example,  field
 borders,  which the Board thought would be very difficult  to  apply,   proved
 to   be  popular with rural  landowners.   The initial  cost-share rate,  set for
 field borders by the Board, was  reduced before the  end of the project.

      In other  cases, as  much as  90  percent cost  sharing was paid  to  achieve
 cooperation.   It is doubtful  that the  project would have  been as  successful
 as  it was if  the Board had not retained this  ability  to  make  changes  in
 cost-share rates or other  incentives.

      To make  sure that uniform procedures were followed in the  conduct of
 the  project,   an  operations  manual was prepared  by the project staff and
 adopted by the Board.  The operations manual provided  a guide   for  dealing
with  anticipated problems that  could  arise during  the program.   It spelled
out procedures for actions to be  taken  in the event a  contract was not  fol-
                                                    TECHNICAL APPROACH

-------
50
                                  TABLE 5
          Degree of Difficulty for Black Creek Conservation Goals
District Cooperators
Conservation Plans
Land Adequately Treated
Conservation Cropping System
Critical Area Planting
Crop Residue Management
Diversions
Farmstead and Feedlot Windbreak
Field Border
Field Windbreak
Grade Stabilization Structure
Grassed Waterway or Outlet
Holding Ponds and Tanks
Livestock Exclusion
Livestock Watering Facility
Minimum Tillage
Pasture and Hayland Management
Pasture and Hayland Planting
Pond
Recreation Area Improvement
Sediment Control Basin
Stream Channel Stabilization
Streambank Protection
Stripcropping
Surface Drains
Terraces, Gradient
Terraces, Parallel
Tile Drains
Tree Planting
Wildlife Habitat Management
Woodland Improved Harvesting
Woodland Improvement
Easy
Normal
Normal
Difficult
Moderately Difficult
Difficult
Difficult
Normal
Very Difficult
Normal
Moderately Difficult
Difficult
Easy
Moderately Difficult
Moderately Difficult
Difficult
Difficult
Difficult
Easy
Normal
Difficult
Moderately to Very Difficult
Moderately Difficult
Very Difficult
Difficult
Very Difficult
Very Difficult
Difficult
Very Difficult
Moderately Difficult
Moderately Difficult
Difficult
 lowed by participating landowners, what to do in the event of the death  of
 a   cooperator,  and  what  the  responsibilities of all parties were in the
 event that  land ownership changed.

     Adoption of  the operations manual made it possible to avoid ad hoc de-
 cisions.    Even   though  all of the eventualities anticipated in the manual
 did not, in fact,  take place, the Board considers that the  time  spent  on
 its preparation was worthwhile.

     Administrative control of the project was retained by the Board of Su-
 pervisors,   even   though the day-to-day operation was delegated to the pro-
 ject director.  This control was maintained by requiring Board approval  at
 several  critical  stages  in the process of working with cooperators.  The
 Board was required to approve each initial agreement in which  a  landowner
 became   a   "cooperator" of the district.  The Board further was required to
 approve  the conservation plan on which compliance and possible cost-sharing
 TECHNICAL APPROACH

-------
                                                                          51
was  based.  This approval came in the form of a contract with the landown-
er.  Finally, the Board was required to  approve  payment  of  claims  made
under the contract.  In this way, the Board was not only regularly informed
of the progress being made under the project, but also had the  opportunity
to make changes, if necessary, in procedures, payment rates, and certifica-
tion of compliance.

3.3 TECHNICAL APPROACH

     Detailed monitoring of water quality and  other  parameters  has  been
carried  out  since  the  beginning  of  the Black Creek Project.  This was
necessary to fulfill the purpose of understanding  the  mechanisms  whereby
land  use affects water quality.  Monitoring was carried out by both Purdue
and University of Illinois personnel.  Both carried out water quality moni-
toring,  and each investigated other parameters.  The monitoring scheme for
the Black Creek watershed is described in this section.

3.3.1 Sampling

3.3.1.1 MAJOR MONITORING SITES — PURDUE

     Purdue has collected regular grab samples at the  sites  listed  here.
These locations are identified in Figure 7.


3.3.1.1.1 Water Quality Sampling Sites

     1.  Killian Drain at Notestine Road
     2.  Smith-Fry Drain at Notestine Road
     3.  Wertz Drain at Notestine Road
     4.  Gorrell Drain at Notestine Road
     5.  Richelderfer Drain at Notestine Road
     6.  Black Creek at Brush College Road
     7.  Lake Drain at Bull Rapids Road
     8.  Wertz Drain at St. Hwy. #37
     9.  Dreisbach at Trammel Road
     10.  Dreisbach at St. Hwy. #37
     11.  Fuelling Drain at Ward Road
     12.  Black Creek at Ward Road
     13.  Wann Drain at Killian Road
     14.  Maumee River at St. Hwy. #101
     15.  Fuelling Drain below sediment basin
     16.  Richelderfer Drain at Stopher Road
     17.  St. Mary's River at Ferguson Road
     18.  St. Joseph River at Van-Zile Road
     19.  Dreisbach at Cuba Road (end waterway)

     Rainfall amount was measured regularly at the  following  seven  loca-
tions.   Periodically  samples  of rainfall were analyzed for water quality
parameters.
                                                   TECHNICAL APPROACH

-------
 52
                     Figure 7.  Purdue Monitoring Sites
3.3.1.1.2 Raingage Sites
TECHNICAL APPROACH

-------
                                                                        53


     1.  Approximately 1/8 mile west of Cuba  Road  on  Springfield  Center
     Road.
     2.  Southwest corner junction Springfield Center Road and Spencerville
     Road.
     3.  Approximately 1/4 miles east of Spencerville Road on Grabill Road.
     4.  Northwest corner junction of St. Hwy. #37 and Ruppert Road.
     8.  Approximately 1/4 mile south of junction Notestine Road  and  Rup-
     pert Road.
     9.  Fuelling Drain and Shaffer Road.
     20.  1/4 mile east of St. Hwy. #101 and Gar Creek Road ('75).

     Two sediment basins, the smaller being designated a  desilting  basin,
were constructed for study of the impact of this practice  on water  quality.
These were located the following locations.
                                                TECHNICAL APPROACH

-------
54
   3.3.1.1.3 Sediment Basin Study Sites

        1.  Fuelling Drain east of Shaffer Road
        2.  Desilting basin in Black approximately 3/4 mile  east  of  Shaffer
        Road and 1/4 mile south of St. Hwy. #101

        Stage recorders and other methods of measuring stream  flow  were  in-
   stalled  at nine locations in the watershed.  Stream flow data is necessary
   to convert concentrations measured of the various parameters into loadings.
   These measurements were made at the following locations.


   3.3.1.1.4 Stage Recorder, Flow Measuring Sites

        1.  Killian Drain at Notestine Road
        2.  Smith-Fry Drain at Notestine Road
        3.  Wertz Drain at Notestine Road
        4.  Gorrell Drain at Notestine Road
        5.  Richelderfer Drain at Notestine Road
        6.  Black Creek at Brush College Road
        12.  Black Creek at Ward Road
        13.  Wann Drain at Killian Road
        15.  Fuelling Drain at sediment basin outlet

        Backwater due to flow restrictions in the lower reaches of Black Creek
   has  on  occasion caused flow measurement problems at stations 2 and 12 and
   to a lesser degree at other sites.  Stream flow is determined by  measuring
   stage  and  using a flow rating curve; however, during periods of backwater
   influence the stage vs. flow relationship can change unpredictably.

        A deflection vane current meter was developed  by  the  Department  of
   Agricultural  Engineering  to  provide  improved  flow determination during
   periods of backwater influence.  The current meter measures water  velocity
   at  a fixed depth near the center of the stream.  The additional flow velo-
   city information is combined with stage data to improve the accuracy of the
   flow  rate determination.  The meter is also capable of measuring a limited
   range of back-flow velocities should such conditions occur.

        The current meter senses flow velocity by a spring-loaded  vane  which
   is  mounted perpendicular to the stream flow.  A gearing mechanism provides
   two digital lines which indicate each 3.6 degrees of  vane  deflection  and
   the  direction of that movement.  An analog signal proportional to vane de-
   flection is also available.  Of course, meter readings are  not  meaningful
   until the deflection vane is fully inundated.  A break-away mounting brack-
   et is used to prevent damage in  the  event  that  large  floating  objects
   strike the meter.

        Current meters were installed at sampling sites 2,  6  and  12  during
   January, 1978.

        A question posed at the beginning of the study concerned the impact of
   tile  drainage on water quality.  The following sites were utilized to col-
   lect samples to measure concentrations and loadings from tile drains.
   TECHNICAL APPROACH

-------
                                                                       55
 3.3.1.1.5 Tile Drain Outfall Studies  (approximate outlet locations)
     R29   Richelderfer Drain at Notestine Road
     B59   Black Creek at junction Darling Road and Bull Rapids
     L6    Lake Drain at Bull Rapids Road
     Fll   Fuelling Drain Along Ward Road 1/4 mile  west  junction  Shaffer
     Road
     G13   200 feet east of Gorrell Drain and Notestine Road along  Gorrell
     Drain
     Weo   600 feet east of Wertz Drain and Ruppert Road along Wertz Drain
     SF2   Smith-Fry Drain and Notestine Road
     K7    Killian Drain and St. Hwy. #101
     SF26  Smith-Fry Drain and St. Hwy. #101
     K65   Killian Drain and Antwerp Road
     Wa2   300 feet west Warm Drain and Killian Road along Warm Drain
     SF51  Smith-Fry Drain and Knouse Road
     SF61  Smith-Fry Drain and Ruppert Road
     SF79  Smith-Fry Drain and Springfield Center Road
     We69  Wertz Drain and St. Road #37
     G63   Gorrell Drain and Antwerp Road
     R59   Richelderfer Drain and Hamm Road
     D71   Dreisbach Drain and Antwerp Road
     D122  Dreisbach Drain and Cuba Road at waterway outlet
     D116  Dreisbach Drain at junction Grabill Road and Cuba Road
     #20   1/4 mile east junction Gar Creek Road and St.  Hwy.  #101  along
     Miller Ditch

     The effect of bank slope and mulch on ditch bank erosion was  investi-
gated  systematically at two locations.  These are identified and described
below.
3.3.1.1.6 Ditch Bank Mulch Study Sites

     1.  Joe Graber Farm
     Slopes — 2:1, 3:1, 4:1
     Mulch — Straw, stone, wood chips, no mulch, aquatain, saw dust
     Seeding — Mixture tall fescue and red top

     2.  Dick Yerks Farm
     Slopes — 2:1, 3:1, 4:1
     Mulch — Straw, stone, wood chips, no mulch
     Seeding — Mixture tall fescue and red top

     The Agricultural Research Service rainfall simulator was used to  con-
duct  several  tests  of  the  relationship between parameters such as soil
type, slope, tillage, surface cover and erosion.  Primary location of  this
work are listed below.
3.3.1.1.7 Rainulator Study Sites

     1.  Virgil Hirsch Farm
     Nappanee silt loam; 1% slope or less
     2.  Virgil Hirsch Farm
     Hoytville silty clay loam;  1% slopes or less
                                                 TECHNICAL APPROACH

-------
  56
       3.  Dick Yerks Farm
       Haskins sandy loam; 1% slope or less
       4.  Dennis Bennett Farm
       Morley silt loam; 5% slopes
       5.  Graber Farm
       Morley silt loam; 5% slopes

       Tillage research utilizing replicated plots and  several  combinations
  of tillage was carried out at the following locations.


  3.3.1.1.8 Tillage Study Sites

       1.  Max Woebbeking Farm — Nappanee silty loam
       2.  Bill Shanebrook Farm — Hoytville silty clay loam
       3.  Oliver Stieglitz Farm — Whitaker loam
       4.  Roger Ehle Farm — Rensellaer  silty clay loam,  Whitaker  loam,  Osh-
       temo fine sandy loam
       5.  Dennis Bennett Farm — Morley  silt loam
       6.  Bill Schaefer Farm — Haskins  loam

       Automatic (PS-69)  pump samplers were utilized at four  locations  to ob-
  tain  data  useful  for describing variations in concentrations  and  loadings
  during  a  storm event.   These sites are  listed here.


  3.3.1.1.9 Automatic Water  Sampling Stations

       2.   Smith-Fry  Drain  at Notestine Road
       6.   Black Creek at Brush  College Road
       12.   Black Creek  at Ward  Road
       20.   1/4  mile  east junction  Gar Creek road  and State  Hwy.   101  along
       Miller Ditch  (abandoned after six months due  to  vandalism)

       An automated station  capable of recording weather and stream flow  data
  for itself and  of recording  and reporting  data from four remote substations
 was installed.  The locations  for major elements of this system are   listed
 here.


 3.3.1.1.10 Hydrological Remote Sensoring Site

       1.  Black  Creek at Brush College Road


 3.3.1.1.11 Substations

       1.  Smith-Fry Drain at Notestine Road
      2.  Wertz Drain at Notestine Road
      3.  Gorrell Drain at Notestine Road
      4.  Richelderfer Drain at Notestine Road
TECHNICAL APPROACH

-------
                                                                        57


 3.3.1.2 SAMPLE STATIONS — U of !_

 3.3.1.2.1 Fish Sample Stations

      Twenty-nine  sampling  stations  were   established   throughout   the
 watershed  and in nearby streams for fish studies.  All (except station 14)
 included 100 m of stream channel.   Some stations were dropped after initial
 studies  because  of  special  stream  conditions,  intermittent  nature of
 stream, lack of fish or other reasons.

      1.  Killian Drain above Notestine Road
      2.  Smith-Fry Drain above Notestine Road
      3.  Wertz Drain above Notestine Road
      4.  Upper Gorrell Drain above Notestine Road
      5.  Richelderfer Drain above  Notestine Road
      6.  Dreisbach Drain above Brush College Road
      7.  Lake Drain above Bull Rapids Road
      8.  Wertz Drain above State Highway #37
      9.  Dreisbach Drain above Trammel Road
      10.   Dreisbach Drain above State Highway #37
      11.   Fuelling Drain below Ward Road
      12.   Black Creek above Ward Road
      13.   Wann Drain above Killian Road
      14.   Maumee River at State Highway #101
      15.   Black Creek Downstream from entry of Smith-Fry Drain
      16.   Wertz Drain between Notestine Road and Black  Creek
      17.   Black Creek immediately  upstream from entry of Wertz Drain
      18.   Black Creek immediately  below entry of Richelderfer  Drain
      19.   Smith-Fry Drain between  Indiana Highway #101 and   Antwerp   Road
      (northeast corner of intersection)
      20.   Dreisbach Drain above Antwerp Road
      21.   Hamm Interceptor  at Notestine Road
      22.   Black Creek below entry  of Richelderfer  Drain
      23.   Maumee River at entry of Black Creek
      24.   Black Creek above Maumee River
      25.   Black Creek below Ehle Road
      26.   Black Creek below Darling  Road
      28.   Black Creek below Wertz  Drain
      29.   Black Creek immediately  downstream of  Smith-Fry Drain

      Stations  I,  4,  5,  7, 8,  11, 14,  16,  21-25 were dropped  after  initial
studies.

3.3.1.2.2 Water  Sample Stations

      University of  Illinois water quality monitoring  stations  were  esta-
blished  on  the  main stem of Black Creek, along Wertz drain, on Dreisbach
Drain,  and at other locations  in the watershed.  These are listed below and
are located in  Figure  8.

Dreisbach Drain


101  At Springfield Center Road, North side of road above  drop  structure.
Grass waterway.
                                                      TECHNICAL APPROACH

-------
 58
  /
    /
     /
      /
s

                    Figure 8.  Illinois Monitoring Sites
 102  At Cuba Road, 50 feet above bridge east side of  road;   lower  end  of
 grass waterway.
TECHNICAL APPROACH

-------
                                                                         59
103  Ditch channel at Cuba Road east side of road.

104  Lower end of rip-rap at bridge west side of Cuba Road.

105  Along stream west of road at Cuba and Grabill Roads intersection; just
above several "rock ledges."

106  Stream channel at above intersection; several feet above entry of  wa-
ter at drop structure from field to the west.

107  Water flowing over the drop structure at northwest corner of Cuba  and
Grabill Roads.

108  Water flowing from drain tile just south of drop structure Tile D-116.

109  Stream above bridge at Grabill Road

110  At survey flag 100 feet below swimming pool and across stream from me-
tal tile.

Ill  At fence post on edge of Joe Graber farm.  Upstream about 40 feet from
marker flag 104+00.

Stations 110 and 111 on relatively straight channel with steep eroding bank
slope.

112  Just above bridge on Joe Graber farm and short distance  above  "tile"
outlet  on west side.  Downstream 30 feet from 107+00 marker flag.  Channel
above this station has shallow slope bank.

113  About 10 feet above rock area above Trammel Road on  Dreisbach  Drain.
Channel above in grass with medium slope to bank.

114  40 feet upstream from bridge at Antwerp Road at middle to low  end  of
long slow pool.

115  At lower end of rip-rap on west side of stream.

116  40 feet below sewage treatment effluent tile from trailer park.

117  10 feet north of south end of "willow" thicket along stream.

118  Just above bend in stream 3/8 mile above Notestine Road.

119  At south end of fence row but slightly above outlets  of  three  drain
tiles.  Area with medium sloped bank.

120  40 feet above bridge.  Bank with medium slope.

Stations 119 and 120 both on grassy  channel  with  field  border  on  both
sides.

121  Sample at middle of fish sample station  number  6B;   about  150  feet
above rip-rap.

122  At lower end of rip-rap.


                                                     TECHNICAL APPROACH

-------
 60
 123   Under  bridge  at Brush College Road.


 Black Creek

 124   Lower  end of  rip-rap below Brush College Road.

 125   Fourth telephone pole downstream from bridge; end of straight   channel
 section with grass channel and field border.

 126   Above  rip-rap at bend to north;  somewhat  meandering  channel;  grass
 channel with field border.

 127   30 feet west  of bridge at entry of Richelderfer Drain to Black  Creek.
 Meandering  channel with grass banks.

 128   On Richelderfer Drain 40 feet above bridge  on  Darling  Road.   Grass
 channel with field border.

 129   Downstream on Black Creek about 50 feet from  entry  of  Richelderfer;
 Station 18  of fish studies.

 130   40 feet above rock  (rip-rap) at bend.

 131   40 feet above rock  (rip-rap) area just before stream turns to east.

 132   20 feet above entry of Wertz Drain to Black Creek.

 133   At top of riffle area in Station 28 of fish studies.

 134   At bottom of  riffle area in Station 28 of fish studies.

 135   Discharge from surface flow from field to north.

 136   Discharge from tile outlet from terraces in field to west.

 137   At survey flag #395 in area with forest along both banks.

 138   At lower end  of forest on both banks.

 139   At lower end  of field on one side of stream; forest on other bank.

 140   Just above Schaeffer Road bridge; heavy sewage inflow at  house  above
 Schaeffer»Road.

 141   Black  Creek about 15 feet above entry of Smith-Fry Drain.

 142   At lower end  of Station 15A; woodland on  west  side,  field  on  east
 side.

 143   At lower end  of rip-rap and steep erosion bank.

 144   At lower end  of wooded area both sides above sediment basin.

 145   20 feet above bridge at sediment basin.



TECHNICAL  APPROACH

-------
                                                                        61


 146  At lower end of sediment basin.

 147  About 200 meters below the sediment basin.

 148  About 180 meters below station 147, and about 100 feet above flag #470
 which is where the stream turns to the west.

 149  At flag #477.

 Comment — Large pool at flag #480.

 150  Near south end of woods but above the small drainage channel  entering
 from the west.

 Comment — Flag #482 is about 300 to 400 feet south of edge of  both  sides
 forest.

 151  Just above rock (rip-rap)  area in fields.

 152  At upper end of Station 12 of fish studies.

 153  At lower end of Station 12 just above Ward  Road.

 154  At north edge of thicket area.

 155  At telephone pole in field above bridge at  Ehle Road — west side.

 156  Downstream from bridge  at Ehle Road about halfway to river

 157  Maumee River upstream from Black Creek.


 Wertz Drain

 158  Wertz Drain just above  Boger  Road;  at lower  end above woodlot.

 159  Above Springfield Center  Road.   Below area of grass  waterway.

 160  Above Spencerville Road.

 161  Overflow from drop structure  at  lower  end of grass waterway.

 162  Flow from underground pipe of  waterway; east pipe.

 163   Station  in  forest at market flag  #136; moved upstream of  terrace  #218
 outlet.

 164  At fence at  flag #138; some locale below first  rock drop.

 165  Near Bull Rapids road; flag placed on east side of stream.

 166  About 400 feet  downstream  from  Bull  Rapids  Road;  short  distance
 upstream from large shagbark hickory

167  Large pool at location of large tree on west bank.



                                                  TECHNICAL APPROACH

-------
 62
 168  At power line crossing.

 170  Flag marks location of waterfall (at upper end); one station (169)  10
 feet upstream from flag; other station (170)  30 feet downstream.

 171  (Old Station 12) — At upper end of pool about 100  meters  downstream
 from Knouse Road near metal fence post on east bank.

 172  (Old Station 11) — In pool where stream turns to  east  as  you  move
 downstream.  A pile of rocks and bricks are on the west bank at this point.

 173  (Old Station 10) — In pool about 200 meters upstream from bridge.  No
 real landmarks here so distance from forest should be measured.

 174  (Old Station 9)  — In pool about 10-20 meters  inside  woods  —  even
 with double trunk tree laying in stream channel.

 175  (Old Station 8)  — In  riffle  10  meters  below  tree  laying  across
 stream.

 176  (Old Station 7)  — In small rocky pool  5  meters  upstream  of  large
 ditch on east bank — even with triple trunk tree on west bank.

 177  (Old Station 6)  — In first pool inside south end of forest; about  20
 meters downstream of fallen tree across stream.

 178   (Old Station 5) — In pool in grove of trees 30-50 meters  downstream
 of  woods at point below two large cotton woods on east side of bank.  Also
 fallen tree on field border on west side.

 179  (Old Station 4)  — In pool at lower edge of grove of  trees  and  even
 with north edge of trees in field 100 meters east of  stream.

 180  (Old Station 3B) — In pool at lower edge of grove of trees  and  even
 with north edge of trees in field 100 meters east of  stream.

 181  (Old Station 3A) — In pool about midway between large tile downstream
 and grove of trees upstream; even with south edge of  trees in field 100 me-
 ters east of stream.   Small stump on east bank.

 182  (Old Station 2B) — In pool about midway between large erosion

 183  (Old Station 2A) — In riffle area below large west bank erosion  area
 at point where trees are not present on east bank.

 184  (Old Station 1C) — In pool, even with small  tree  on  west  side  of
 stream below grove of trees.

 185  (Old Station IB) — In pool, even with small  tree  on  west  side  of
 stream below grove of trees.

 186  (Old Station 1A) — In a small pool adjacent to tree on east bank.

 A more detailed map of water sample stations in Wertz  Woods  area  is  at-
 tached .
TECHNICAL APPROACH

-------
                                                                        63
187   100 feet downstream from fence.

188  Above bridge (some distance)  above Ruppert Road.

189  Just above Notestine Road

190  Just above entry of Wertz Drain into Black Creek Smith-Fry Drain.

191  Just upstream from Highway 37 Bridge

192  At point where stream bends to east as one moves downstream.

193  Downstream about 20-30 meters from Ruppert Road.

194  Midway between Ruppert and Krouse Roads.

195  Just above Knouse Road.

196  Just above Dean Road

197  Just west of Highway 101, above Antwerp Road.

198  Just above Antwerp Road.

199  Just west of Highway 101 below Antwerp Road.

200  Just above fence at upper end of wooded area.

201  At upper end of old field thicket, pasture  area,  drain  tile  enters
between 200 and 201.

202  40 yards above farm bridge crossing and just above two  tile  inflows;
orange marker flag at site.

203  Just above eroding edge of field of east  side  of  stream;  120  feet
above forest on east side; at lower end of pool.

204  In cleaned forest area about 20 meters upstream from the tile inflow.

205  Water from large tile inflow.

206  At lower end of cleared area on west side of stream; 10 to  15  meters
above fence; across from fallen tree.

207  In middle of forested, channeled section of  stream,  location  to  be
determined by Dan Dudley.

208  Lower end of woodland slightly upstream from large bank slippage area.

209  Lower end of eroded bank below woodland area.

210  At lower end of straight area 25 meters above upper end of  station  2
fish sample.

211  Lower end of fish sample station.



                                                     TECHNICAL APPROACH

-------
64


  212   Entry of Smith-Fry Drain into Black Creek.


  Other Stations in Watershed

  213  Wertz Ditch entry to Wertz Drain.  From east side between Route 37 and
  Knouse Road.

  214  Smith-Fry Drain above bridge at Springfield-Center Road.

  215  Warm Ditch above Knouse Road.

  216  Small terrace just south of station 136 with drains about 20 acres.

  217  Terrace area on Dreisbach Drainage located just north of Trammel  Road
  and east of stream channel.

  218  Terrace on Wertz Drain just north of station 163.

  219  Terrace on Dreisbach Drain north of station 102.

  220  Black Creek at downstream end of channel modification below Ehle Road.

  221  Warm Ditch located just upstream of first bend above station 215.

 3.3.1.3 AUTOMATIC PUMPING SAMPLERS

      Automatic  pumping samplers  (PS-69)  were installed at  stations  2,  6,
 and  12 in the  Black Creek Watershed  and have been operating since February
 22, 1975, March 17,  1975,  and April 4,  1975, respectively.    A  sampler  is
 pictured in Figure 9.   The stations are located in the lower section of the
 watershed to allow sampler data  to closely describe movement of water qual-
 ity  constituents  from  the  watershed.    The  physical   operation  of the
 samplers has been very satisfactory  (one even continued  to  operate  while
 being inundated by a severe storm).

      The samplers are  energized  only  while  the stage  in   their   respective
 stream  is  above the  one  foot level.   While energized, the samplers take  a
 500 ml water  sample  every  thirty minutes  with a seventy-two sample capacity
 (36  hours).  The samples  collected are analyzed for the  same water  quality
parameters as the "grab" samples,  namely, ammonium,  nitrate,   total   nitro-
gen,   soluble nitrogen,   inorganic   phosphorus,   total phosphorus,  soluble
phosphorus,  and suspended  solids.

3.3.1.4 AUTOMATIC TILE SAMPLER

      An automatic tile sampler has been operational  since March,  1976.  The
operation  of the   tile   sampling station  is  unique in that  discrete water
quality samples are  collected proportionally to the  tile outflow,  which is
continuously  monitored  and  recorded.  The time  in which  a  sample  is  col-
lected is also recorded on  the flow hydrograph  chart.  The  sampler has  the
capability of  collecting  72,  500 ml water samples.  The  sampling  rate is
approximately 1 sample per  30 minutes at maximum flow.

      Another  feature of the tile sampling station  is the prevention  of  the
tile  outlet from becoming  inundated.  This  is necessary to  provide reliable

TECHNICAL APPROACH

-------
                                                                         65
                Figure 9.  Automatic Pumping Sampler  (PS-69)


data during storm events in which the ditch water level is above  the  tile
outlet.   Two 200 GPM pumps used in conjunction with a sump maintain a free
                                                  TECHNICAL APPROACH

-------
66
 water  fall  over  the  flow calibrated weir.   The  tile  sampler  is  described in
 below.

 3.3.2  Laboratory Analysis

 3.3.2.1 PURDUE

      Analysis of samples at Purdue University has  been carried  out  accord-
 ing  to the  following procedures.

 1.   Suspended solids:   solids  in  an aliquot of  the water   sample  (250  ml)
 are  collected   on a tared  Nucleopore membrane  (47 mm diameter, 0.4 14m mean
 pore size),  dried at 105 degrees  C, and  filter  is  weighed.   Reported as  mg
 suspended solids per liter  of  water.

 2.   Total nitrogen:   The method of Nelson  and Sommers  (1975)   is  used  to
 determine total  N in filtered  and unfiltered aliquots of  water  samples.

 3.   Ammonium -N:  The method of Bremner  and Keeney  (1965)  was  used  to
 determine ammonium -N in filtered water  samples.

 4.   Nitrate plus nitrite -N:  The method of Bremner  and Keeney   (1965)   was
 used to determine (nitrite  + nitrate)-N.

 5.   Soluble inorganic phosphorus: Reactive inorganic phosphorus was deter-
 mined  in filtered water samples by the method of Murphy and  Riley (1962).

 6.   Total phosphorus:   Total P in filtered and  unfiltered water samples was
 determined   by   the   perchloric acid digestion  method of  Sommers and Nelson
  (1972).

 7.   Total organic carbon:  Total  organic C in filtered and unfiltered  water
 samples were determined with a Dohrman Envirotech  DC-50 Carbon  Analyzer.

 8.   Selected alkali, alkaline  earth, and transition  metals:   Ca, Mg, Na, K,
 Cu,  Ni, Zn, Cd, and Pb were determined  in filtered  water samples by atomic
 absorption  spectrophotometry.

 9.   Other water  parameters: temperature,  dissolved  oxygen,  alkalinity, pH,
 and  conductivity were determined in situ or immediately after sampling by
 methods described by the American Public Health Association  (1971) .

 Calculations used in estimating constituents in water samples:

 Soluble organic  N -  Total N(filtered) -  (nitrate + nitrite + ammonium)-N
 Sediment N  = Total N(unfiltered)  - Total N(filtered)
 Soluble organic  P =  Total P(filtered -  soluble  inorganic  P
 Sediment P  = Total P(unfiltered)  - Total P(filtered)
 Sediment organic C = Organic C(unfiltered  - Organic  C(filtered)

                                   References
  American Public Health Association,  1971.   Standard Methods for the  Exami-
  nation  of  Water and Wastewater.   13th ed. American Public Health Associa-


 TECHNICAL APPROACH

-------
                                                                        67


 tion, Washington D.C.

 Bremner, J.M. and D.R.  Keeney,  1965.   Stream  Distillation  Methods  for
 Determination  of  Ammonium,  Nitrate,  and  Nitrite.   Anal.  Chem.  Acta.
 32:485-495.

 Murphy, J. and J.P. Riley, 1962.  A modified single solution method for the
 determination  of  phosphate  in natural water.  Anal. Chem. Acta.  27:254-
 267.

 Nelson, D.W. and L.E. Sommers, 1975.  Determination of  total  nitrogen  in
 natural waters.  J. Environ. Qual.  4:465-468.

 Sommers, L.E. and D.W. Nelson, 1972.  Determination of total phosphorus  in
 soils:  A  rapid  perchloric acid digestion procedure.  Soil Sci Soc. Amer.
 Proc.  36:902-904.

 3.3.2.2 UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS

     Analysis at the University of Illinois was carried out at the Illinois
 Natural Survey according to the procedure listed in Table 6.
                                  TABLE 6
                  University of Illinois Analytic Methods
            "ParametersMethods
Total Alkalinity  (as CaC03)       Metrohm Autotitrator to pH 4.6*
Total Dissolved lonizable Solids  By Calculation from Specific Conductance
   (as NaCl)                          Table
EDTA Hardness  (as CaC03)          EDTA Colorimetric Method (Autoanalyzer)
Turbidity  (JTU)                   Monitek Model 150 Turbidimeter
Total Phosphorus  (as P)           Stannous Chloride Method*
Soluble Orthophosphate  (as P)     Ascorbic Acid Method (Autoanalyzer)*
Nitrate (as N)                    Cadmium Reduction Method (Autoanalyzer)*
Nitrite (as N)                    Diazotization Method (Autoanalyzer)
Ammonia (as N)                    Berthelot Reaction Method (Autoanalyzer)
Organic Nitrogen  (as N)           Modified Berthelot Reaction Method
                                   (Autoanalyzer)
Sulfate (as S)                    Turbidimetric Method*
Residue, Total                    Constant Weight Upon Drying @ 180 C,
                                    Unfiltered*
*  Standard Methods

American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association,
and Water Pollution Control Federation.
1975.
Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater,
14th ed. Washington, D. C.  1193 pp.
MERCURY - WATER

Procedure:  A 50-ml aliquot of unfiltered water is treated with 10-ml of 5%


                                                   TECHNICAL APPROACH

-------
68
potassium   sulfate  and  digested  for  3 hours  at  room temperature.   A 10-ml
aliquot of  the digested  sample  is  transferred  to  the   reduction  vessel  of
the Mercury Analyzer.  One ml of 5%  tin chloride  is added  to  the  vessel and
a  2 minute  reaction time is  allowed  before  the Hg vapor   is   swept   through
the   absorption cell of  the  analyzer.  Quantitative results are obtained by
comparison  with standard Hg  solutions  of  1,  10, and 50 ppb Hg treated in  a
like  manner to the samples.

Equipment:  Fisher Mercury Analyzer, Varian Model 485 Digital Integrator

Detection Limit:  0.2 ppm  (yg Hg/ml  water)

Reference:  A. A. El-Awady,  R.  B.  Miller, M. J. Carter,  Analytical   Chemis-
try 48 (1), 110-117  (1976).                              	   	


WATER CATIONS -  (Ag, Al, As, B, Ba,  Be, Cd,  Co, Cr, Cu,  Fe, Hg, Mg,  Mn, Mo,
Ni, Pb, Sb, Se, Si, Sn,  V, Zn.)

Procedure:  The sample   was  analyzed  by  emission   spectrometry  using  a
radio-frequency   inductively-coupled  argon plasma as the source of radia-
tion.  Standard solutions of the elements desired are used  in calibrating
the  instrument which  is  controlled by  a mini-computer.

Equipment:  Sartorius Membrane  Filter  Holders, Jarrell-Ash Model  975 Plasma
AtomComp

Detection limits  are  presented  in  Table  7.
                                   TABLE 7
                Detection Limits  (micrograms metal/ml water)
Ag
Al
As
B
Ba
Be
.007 ppm
.051
.045
.004
.001
.001
Cd
Co
Cr
Cu
Fe
Fe
.004 ppm
.006
.007
.004
.020
.020
Mg
Mn
Mo
Ni
Pb
Pb
.001 ppm
.002
.007
.011
.033
.033
Se
Si
Sn
V
Zn
Zn
.039 ppm
.030
.028
.007
.009
.009
 Reference:  U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Methods for the Analysis
 of Water and Wastewater, 1974.


 TOTAL Hg - SEDIMENT

 Procedure:  A sample of  sediment  is  centrifuged  at  3,000-rpn  for  ten
 minutes  and  the  interstitial  water  decanted.  A 2-g sub-sample is then
 placed in a 250-ml Erlenmeyer flask to which 25-ml of aqua regia is  added.
 The  flask  and  sample  are  heated to boiling and boiled for two minutes.
 After it has cooled to room temperature, the flask has 25-ml of 5% potassi-
 um  promangenate  and 2-ml of 5% potassium sulfate added to it.  The sample
 is then digested for 30 minutes in a 95 degree C water bath.  The  digested
 solution  is  treated  with 10% ammonium hydrochloride to reduce the excess

 TECHNICAL APPROACH

-------
                                                                        69
potassium promangenate.  The liquid is transferred to a  100-ml  volumetric
flask, the residual sediment washed several times with deionized water, the
washing added to the volumetric flask, and the solution diluted  to  volume
with deionized water.

     A 10-ml aliquot of the digested samples is transferred to  the  reduc-
tion vessel of the Mercury Analyzer.  One ml of 5% tin chloride is added to
the vessel, and a two minute reaction time is allowed before the  Hg  vapor
is swept through the absorption cell of the analyzer.  Quantitative results
are obtained by comparison of the values obtained with the results of stan-
dard  Hg  solutions of 1, 10, and 50 ppb Hg treated in a like manner to the
samples.

Equipment:  precision 67390 Centrifuge, Blue M Model 1130A Water Bath, Fish
Mercury Analyzer, Varian Model 485 Digital Integrator

Detection Limits:  2 ppb (ygHg/g dry sediment)

Reference:  I. K. Iskandar, D. R. Keeney, Environmental Science  and  Tech-
nology, 8  (2), 165-170  (1974).
L. W. Jacobs, D. R. Keeney, ibid, 8  (3), 267-268  (1974).


ACiD EXTRACTABLE CATION - SEDIMENTS AND SOILS  (Ag, Al, As, B, Ba,  Be,  Cd,
Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Hg, Mg, Mn, Mo, Ni, Pb, Se, Si, Sn, V, Zn.)

Procedure:  A 5-g representative aliquot of the sample is  weighed  into  a
50-ml  plastic  centrifuge  tube,  and 20-ml of 0.05 N acid mixture (0.01 N
sulfuric acid + 0.04 N HC1) is added.  The tube is shaken mechanically  for
one  hour and then centrifuged at 20,000-rpm for  ten minutes.  The superna-
tant is carefully decanted and analyzed by emission  spectrometry  using  a
radio-frequency  inductively-coupled  argon  plasma as the source of radia-
tion.  Standard solutions of the elements desired are used  in  calibrating
the instrument which  is controlled by a mini-computer.

Equipment:  Reciprocal shaker, Beckman Model J-2IB Centrifuge,  Jarrell-Ash
Model 975 Plasma AtomComp

Detection Limits are  presented in Table 8.
                                  TABLE  8
           Detection Limits in Micrograms Metal/Gram Dry Sediment
Ag
Al
As
B
Ba
Be
.03 ppm
.21
.18
.02
.004
.004
Cd
Co
Cr
Cu
Fe
Hg
.16 ppm
.02
.03
.02
.08
2.0
Mg
Mn
Mo
Ni
Pb
Sp
.004 ppm
.01
.03
.04
.13
.19
Se
Si
Sn
V
Zn

.16
.12
.11
.03
.60

ppm





Reference: Perkin-Elmer Analytical Methods  for Atomic  Absorption   Spectro-
photometry,  1976.
TECHNICAL APPROACH

-------
70
 MERCURY - SOFT TISSUES

 Procedure:   The  tissues  are  freeze-dried  and pulverized  so  that  a  relative-
 ly  homogeneous   0.5-g   sample  can be  removed  for  analysis.  The  sample  is
 weighed into a 125-ml Erlenmeyer  flask, which is placed  in  an ice  bath, and
 to  which is added,  in order, 20-ml of  concentrated sulfuric acid, 10-ml  of
 concentrated nitric  acid,  and 20-ml of  5% potassium promangenate.   The sam-
 ples  are   then  allowed  to stand  15 minutes at  room temperature  after  which
 10-ml of 5% potassium sulfate is  added.   The samples are then digested two
 hours  in   a  95  degree  C  water  bath. Small amounts of solid  potassium
 promangenate are added as  needed  to  maintain  an   oxidizing  environment.
 After  digestion  and  cooling, the sample is diluted to volume  in a 100-ml
 volumetric  flask with deionized water.

       A 10-ml aliquot of  the  digested  sample is  transferred  to the  reduction
 vessel  of  the Mercury Analyzer.  One ml  of 5%  tin  chloride is added to the
 vessel and  a two minute  reaction  time is  allowed before   the  Hg  vapor  is
 swept  through  the  absorption cell  of the analyzer. Quantitative results
 are obtained by  comparison of the values  obtained with the  results of stan-
 dard  Hg solutions  of  1,  10, and 50  ppb  Hg treated in a like manner to the
 samples.

 Equipment:   Blue M Model 1130A Water  Bath, Fisher Mercury Analyzer,  Varian
 Model 485 Digital Integrator

  Detection Limits:  4 ppb  (yg Hg/g wet tissue)

  Reference:   W.L. Anderson, K.  E.  Smith, Environmental Science and Technolo-
  gy, 11  (1), 75-80 (1977).


  Method of Analysis of Pesticides and PCB's in Water, Sediments,  and Fish

  Water:  The volume was measured and placed in  a   separatory  funnel.   For
  PCB's,  100  ml  of  10  percent  ether   in  hexane was added with shaking,
  separated, dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate and  reduced with   a  3  ball
  Snyder  column and the volume adjusted  for injection into GLC.   For  atrazine
  and 245-T,  the  extraction was effected with three  portions  of  100  ml  of
  methylene   chloride  which  was combined,  dried over sodium sulfate, reduced
  with a 3 ball Snyder column and  exchanged with ethyl acetate for   injection
  by flame thermionic ionization.

  Sediment:   Fifty grams  of mixed  sample were extracted by  the   addition  of
  100  ml of  ethyl  acetate, stirring  for an hour  with  magnetic stirs.   The
  ethyl acetate was decanted  with  rinsing, reduced in volume and  dried with
  the  addition of hexane,  over anhydrous  sodium sulfate. Final  results were
  reported on a dry weight  basis.

  Fish:  The whole fish was extracted  with 100 ml acetonitrile  in a  blender.
  The  acetonitrile  was   swirled  with 10  ml hexane  to remove fish  oil, blown
  dry with nitrogen and  ethyl acetate  added for  GLC  analysis.  After  initial
   injection,  they were  saponified and re-extracted  with  hexane  for confirma-
   tion of PCB's.

        Samples suspected of containing 245-T were  acidified  by addition of  a
   drop  of  hydrochloric acid before extraction and  ester ified before GLC in-

   TECHNICAL APPROACH

-------
                                                                          71
 jection.

 Detection Systems

      Lasso,  Furadan,  simazine,  atrazine,  and  malathion  were   analyzed   by
 flame  thermionic ionization on a Varian  2100 gas  chromatograph using  rubi-
 dium sulfate for detection of nitrogen and  phosphorus containing  compounds.
 Column temperature 210 degrees, Port temperature 235 degrees, Nitrogen flow
 15 ml per minute through a 6 foot glass column containing  3  percent   OV-17
 on 100-120 mesh Gas Chrom Q.

      PCB's were measured under  the same conditions using 3  percent  OV-210
 and  1.5   percent OV-17 on 100-120 mesh Gas Chrom  Q in a glass  column  and a
 Ni 63 detector.
                                  TABLE  9
                           Recovery of Compounds
Water  and  sediment:  Nitrogen containing compounds      95%+
                     Phosphorus containing compounds    97.5%
                     PCB's                              98%
Fish:                Nitrogen containing compounds      90%
                     Phosphorus containing compounds    92%
                     PCB's                              98%

Lower  Limits of Detection

Flame  thermionic  ionization:  Nitrogen containing compounds   10 nanograms
                              Phosphorus containing compounds 50 picograms
Electron Capture:             PCB's                          100 picograms
TRACE METAL ANALYSIS

Scope:  Total Cations - Cd, Fe, Zn.
Sample: Soft tissues

Procedure;  A 0.5 - 1 - g sample of freeze dried tissue is weighed  into  a
50-ml  Vycor  crucible,  covered,  and ashed at 450 degrees C for 16-hours.
After cooling, the ash is wetted with a few drops of water, and 5-ml  cone.
nitric  acid  is added.  The crucible is slowly heated to dryness on a hot-
plate and then returned to the muffle furnace for 0.5  hours.   When  cool,
5-ml cone, hydrochloric acid (nitric acid if Ag is to be determined) is ad-
ded and the sample heated on a hot plate to reflux under the inverted  cru-
cible  cover  until  dissolved.   The sample, crucible and cover are rinsed
into a 50-ml volumetric flask and diluted to volume with  deionized  water.
The  solution  is analyzed by emission spectrometry using a radio-frequency
inductively-coupled argon plasma as  the  source  of  radiation.   Standard
solutions  of  the  elements desired are used in calibrating the instrument
which is controlled by a mini-computer.

Equipment:  Muffle furnace, Hotplate, Jarrell-Ash Model 975 Plasma AtomComp
                                                     TECHNICAL  APPROACH

-------
  72
Detection Limits:  ppm  (ug metal/9 wet tissue), Cd  0.09 ppm, Fe  1.0  ppm,
Zn  0.5  ppm

Reference:  K. E. Smith, Illinois Natural History Survey, in-house.

3.3.2.3 OTHER PARAMETERS

     BOD — analysis performed by Pollution Control Systems, Inc.   (Laotto,
Ind.) following procedures of Standard Methods  (APHA 1971).

     COLIFORMS — Samples were collected in sterilized 100 ml glass bottles
by immersing them at the water's surface.  Testing procedures were initiat-
ed five hours or less after sample collection.  The Fort Wayne Allen County
Board  of  Health  Laboratory  conducted  the testing.  The membrane filter
technique was used following Standard Methods (American Public Health Asso-
ciation,  1971)  and  the  recommendations of the Millipore Company.  After
serial dilution of the samples, plates were  inoculated.   Endo  Millipore,
fecal MF-C Millipore and bacto KF dehydrated streptococcus broth (Difco La-
boratories)  were used for total coliform, fecal coliform and fecal strepto-
coccus  tests,  respectively.   The incubation and counting procedures out-
lined in Standard Methods were followed.  Throughout this report  the  bac-
terial  concentrations  are  expressed on the basis of counts per 100 ml of
water.

3.3.2.4 COMPARISON OF ANALYSES

     Comparisons of water quality analysis results  as  determined  by  the
Purdue  and  Illinois Natural History Survey laboratories are shown in Fig-
ures 10 through 12 for suspended solids, ammonium N and nitrate  N.   Water
samples  were  collected at 30-minute intervals during a rainstorm at three
locations in the watershed.   After  collection,  the  water  samples  were
frozen  and  then  alternate  samples were transported to the laboratories,
where they were analyzed according  to  standard  procedures  used  by  the
respective laboratory.

     The concentration values for suspended solids, ammonium N, and nitrate
N  suggest  that  methods  used  by  the  two  laboratories give comparable
results.  There was very close agreement between laboratories for nitrate N
concentrations.   With  ammonium  N,  close  agreement was obtained for one
site, but for the other.two sites, the concentrations obtained by the  Pur-
due laboratory were higher than the concentrations obtained by the Illinois
Natural History Survey Laboratory at one of these locations  and  lower  at
the  other.   Good agreement was obtained for suspended solid concentrations
when the level was below 1400 mg/1.  However, the values  obtained  by  the
Purdue  laboratory  were as much as 25 percent lower than those obtained by
the Illinois Natural History Survey Laboratory at high suspended solid con-
centrations.

3.3.3 Data and Handling

     The data collection procedures and equipment  utilized  in  the  Black
Creek  Project  can best be considered in three separate categories: 1) the
collection of socio-economic data, 2) data collected primarily for  fishery
and biological studies and 3) monitoring the effects of agricultural opera-
tions and loadings of various non-point  source  pollutants  in  the  Black
Creek  and its tributaries.  The first two categories are discussed in Sec-
TECHNICAL APPROACH

-------
    200
    100
(-3
M
O
ffi
n
                                       Station 2
Sample Number
                                                     2000
                                                     1800
                                                     1000
                                                     800
                                                     400
                                                      200
          21  22  23  24 25  26  27  28  29  30 31 32  33  34
                                                                                  Station 6
                                              Sample Number
                                                                                                 1700
                                                                                                 1500
                                                                                                 1300
                                                                                                  900
                                                                                                 700
                                                              14     16     18     20     22     24
                                                                                              Station 12
                                                                                                                Sample Number
                                                                                                       9  10     12     14     16    18
                        Purdue
••0
                        Illinois  >  0   <  0
O
PS
                                Figure 10.  Comparison of  Suspended  Solids
                                                                                                                                         U)

-------
 74
                                                              ja»n jad swejBi||!l/\|
                                                                             CM
                                                                              o
                                                                             '
                                                                             CO
                                     E
                                     3
                                       o
                                       o.
in
M
in
a
                                                                              J81H Jad siuejBi||||/\|
                                                                                             c
                                                                                             o
                                                                                             CO
                                                                                                   £
                                                                                                   3

                                                                                                   Z

                                                                                                   _w

                                                                                                   a.


                                                                                                   I
                                                                                                   
-------
W
O
ffi
2!
H
o
         15
         14
         13
         12
         11
                                            Station 2
Sample Number
                 22      24
                              26
                                                           15
                                                           14
                                                           13
                                                           12
                                                           11
                                                           10
                                     28     29     30     31
                                                                                       Station 6
Sample Number
                                                                                                      20
                                                                                                      18
                                                                                                      16
                                                                                                      14
                                                                                                      12
                                                                                                      10
                                                                                                      10
                                                                  14     16     18      20     22     23
                                                                                                                           Station 12
                                                                                                                    Sample Number
                                                                                10      12     14     16
                                                                                                           18
                                                                                 Purdue


                                                                                 Illinois
o
                                   Figure 12.  Comparison  of Nitrate N
                                                                                                                                            Ol

-------
76
     The concentration values for suspended solids, ammonium N, and nitrate
N  suggest  that  methods  used  by  the  two  laboratories give comparable
results.  There was very close agreement between laboratories for nitrate N
concentrations.   With  ammonium  N,  close  agreement was obtained for one
site, but for the other two sites, the concentrations obtained by the  Pur-
due  laboratory were higher than the concentrations obtained by the Illinois
Natural History Survey Laboratory at one of these locations  and  lower  at
the  other.  Good agreement was obtained for suspended solid concentrations
when the level was below 1400 mg/1.  However, the values  obtained  by  the
Purdue  laboratory  were as much as 25 percent lower than those obtained by
the  Illinois Natural History Survey Laboratory at high suspended solid con-
centrations.

3.3.3 Data and Handling

     The data collection procedures and equipment  utilized  in  the  Black
Creek  Project  can best be considered in three separate categories: 1) the
collection of socio-economic data, 2) data collected primarily for  fishery
and  biological studies and 3) monitoring the effects of agricultural opera-
tions and loadings of various non-point  source  pollutants  in  the  Black
Creek  and its tributaries.  The first two categories are discussed in Sec-
tion 0.0 and Section 0.0.  The third category is further  broken  into  two
major  subcategories.   The network of instrumentation installed at the be-
ginning of the project was based upon a combination of grab  sampling  pro-
cedures  and  independent  strip-chart recorders for measuring rainfall and
stage.  Three stage-initiated, clock driven pumping samplers were installed
to   provide a more comprehensive picture of water quality conditions in the
streams during runoff events.  The specific  equipment,  its  location  and
operation  are  discussed elsewhere in this report.  At about the mid-point
of the project an effort was initiated to develop and install an  automated
data acquisition  system to supplement this other data collection network.
A comprehensive discussion of the philosophy and nature  of  the  resulting
system is the subject of the following material.

3.3.3.1 THE ALERT SYSTEM

     One useful method of classifying data collection systems is  according
to   the  controller to which the basic sensors are attached.  This approach
allows automated systems to be divided into two broad classes: data loggers
and  real-time  computer controlled.  The primary emphasis of the following
discussion is on the latter.

     Traditional methods for  studying  natural  phenomenon  involve  data-
logging.   A data-logging system is one in which the primary function is to
record the data supplied from multiple sensors to a recording  media.   The
storage is a printed copy of values, a strip chart or, in some newer units,
computer readable punch tape or magnetic tape.  These methods imply   (1)  a
substantial  delay  between  data  recording  and  its  availability  to be
analyzed, or  (2) that media other than strip charts  and  printed  copy  be
utilized  to   (a)  reduce  labor and errors associated with transcribing to
computer readable media,  (b) eliminate time registration  errors,  and   (c)
allow more channels of data to be recorded.

     When newer technology is utilized many benefits  occur.   A  real-time
computer  is one which not only collects data from an array of transducers,

TECHNICAL APPROACH

-------
                                                                        77


 but  has  the  ability  to analyze  that  information   in  a  sufficiently  short
 time to  effect a controlled response, dependent on the results of analyzing
 current  conditions.  Thus, the  real-time computer must be able to  communi-
 cate with all transducers at all times  (this is called "on-line") through a
 communications system.

      Real-time data  acquisition inherently provides all the capabilities of
 data  logging  systems  plus  those  resulting from the expanded analytical
 capabilities of an associated on-line computer.   While  real-time  systems
 are   generally  more expensive,  the additional costs are normally a small
 percentage of the total outlay  for an environmental data  acquisition  net-
 work.    In   view of  the substantially increased benefits, they can often be
 easily justified.

      The most important factor  which determines the success of a data  col-
 lection  system  is  the fidelity of the data collected.  The fidelity of a
 data base refers to  its ability to accurately portray the complete behavior
 of the system it purports to characterize.  Data base fidelity is dependent
 upon:  1) proper positioning of  adequate numbers of sensors to  permit  con-
 tinuous  inference of the complete state of the processes under study and 2)
 the  operational reliability of  all components of the data acquisition  sys-
 tem.   Selection of  sensor location is highly process dependent and outside
 the  scope of this discussion.   However, the fact that operational reliabil-
 ity   is  strongly  influenced by system organization, as well as transducer
 hardware selection,  is inadequately appreciated.

      Assembling a system to collect data from a dispersed network of  unat-
 tended  instruments  which must operate over wide environmental extremes is
 not  easy.  It requires both careful selection of  reliable  instruments  as
 well   as proper system configuration.  This involves a configuration which
 provides redundancy  and cross-checking measurements.  An  on-line  computer
 contributes  to both  of these areas.

      First,  an on-line computer affords  a  direct  means  of  providing  a
 redundant  data  recording  system.  No real-time data acquisition which is
 intended to maintain a continuous historical data file should  solely  rely
 on the on-line computer to record incoming data.  A backup data logging ca-
 pability, preferably battery powered, which requires neither  the  computer
 nor   the communication link between the computer and the field instruments
 should be a part of  the backup  system.  Secondly, the  analytical  capacity
 of  an on-line computer makes it feasible to institute sophisticated trans-
 ducer  error detection schemes.  In addition to the simple alarm  limit  ap-
 proach,  one can incorporate tests for rates of change on single and corre-
 lated  variables.  Cross checking can also be program controlled.  For exam-
 ple, air temperature readings can be combined with net solar radiation data
 to yield independent estimates of soil temperatures adequate  to  detect  a
 questionable operational status for a soil temperature transducer.

     Since the communication link to an on-line computer is a two-way path,
 it  is a comparatively minor task to implement operational control of field
 equipment which is dependent upon environmental conditions.   Consider  the
data acquisition needs associated with monitoring nonpoint source pollution
 in a stream.  Many of these pollutant problems are storm  related  and  in-
volve  rapidly  changing  concentrations.   A real-time computer, monitoring
hydrometeorological conditions in a watershed,  can control  the  activation
of remote pumping water samplers to collect frequent samples during rapidly
                                                    TECHNICAL APPROACH

-------
78


changing conditions, but infrequent samples during slowly  changing  condi-
tions.   Such  an approach simultaneously improves the fidelity of the data
base and reduces the total number of water samples which must be  collected
and analyzed.

     An integral part of any data collection  program  is  the  "permanent"
storage  of  data  in a format suitable for subsequent intended uses.  This
function is virtually unchanged between  real-time  and  off-line  systems.
However,  the  virtually  instantaneous  availability of current as well as
historical data files with on-line systems has many ramifications for util-
izing this information.

     The real payoffs for real-time systems almost all  are  direct  conse-
quences  of  immediately applying the phenomenal analytical capability of a
general-purpose computer to data arriving from a remote sensor network.  It
is  the elimination of the time lag between the acquisition of data and its
analysis/interpretation  which  makes  real-time  systems  attractive.   Of
course, any benefits to be realized are totally dependent upon the ingenui-
ty of the persons responsible for developing the  computer  programs  which
must analyze all incoming data.

3.3.3.1.1 Configuration

     In July of 1976, a major amendment to the original Black Creek Project
was  approved.  The additional activity funded under this amendment was the
development of an automated data acquisition system and an associated  dis-
tributed  parameter hydrologic model.  The subsequent development of a sys-
tem designed to accomplish the Acquisition of Local Environmentally Related
Trends,  ALERT,  was  intended to accomplish two primary objectives:  (1) to
automate the process of collecting hydrometeorological data from the  Black
Creek  catchment in order to reduce data transcribing delay and labor while
expanding the scope of data collected and  (2) to  demonstrate  a  real-time
acquisition  system  capable  of providing a data base to permit hydrologic
simulation of watershed responses  concurrently  with  naturally  occurring
storm events.  It should be noted that the ALERT system is a combination of
both hardware  (transducers, etc) and computer software.

     An integral part of the second objective for ALERT involved using  the
computer to generate operational commands  to control pumping samplers which
collect periodic water quality samples during a runoff event.  The  availa-
bility  of  simultaneous  data from a network of sensors dispersed over the
watershed together with the predictive capabilities of the on-line computer
were  intended  to   improve  the fidelity  of these water samples.  This im-
proved fidelity is a result of using short sampling intervals  when   pollu-
tion  concentrations are likely to be changing rapidly and much slower sam-
pling rates when conditions are stable.  The rapid sampling rates make pos-
sible  an  accurate  evaluation of total quantity of pollutant  in the  runoff
while slow rates during stable conditions  reduce the number of samples col-
lected  and  the  cost  of subsequent laboratory analyses.  While the ALERT
system was designed  to satisfy the objectives of a  specific   project,  the
requirements  were   of  such a nature that the resulting system  is directly
applicable to  a large percentage of environmental data acquisition applica-
tions.

      The ALERT hardware was constrained by three major   requirements:  bat-
 TECHNICAL APPROACH

-------
                                                                          79
tery powered operation, low cost, and field maintainability.

     The system hardware must function in areas where 110 VAC line power is
not  available.   This requirement resulted in the use of solar chargers on
NICAD* batteries.  This type of energy source  resulted  in  limited  power
availability  which  restricted  the amount of electronics possible at each
site.  Second, wherever possible CMOS# logic elements were used.  CMOS log-
ic has the attribute of using very low power when it is not active.  Due to
the relatively low rates of change involved in environmental   monitoring  a
great  deal  of  power  is  conserved.   *  NICAD is an acronym for Nlckel-
CADmum.  NICAD batteries exhibit long shelf-life, high current capability,
small  size,  and are rechargeable.  # CMOS is an acronym for Complementary
Symmetric Metal Oxide Silicon.

     One objective of the project was to develop a data acquisition  system
which  would  have  general applicability to other environmental monitoring
applications.  Therefore, it was especially desirable to develop  a  system
of  low  unit  cost.  A remote site with a standard set of transducers (for
our applications) cost on the order  of  $1500.00.   This  requirement  did
somewhat restrict the choice of power supplies described above and preclud-
ed reliance on commercially available complete acquisition systems.  In ad-
dition,  certain  desirable features had to be held to a minimum.  A rather
large reduction in data transfer redundancy was made to cut power  consump-
tion and unit cost.  Naturally, this had some adverse influence on data in-
tegrity.  Since design of the remote stations, a  CMOS  microprocessor  has
become  available.  The designers believe that another project in this area
should carefully check this possibility of having at low power  consumption
a  very  high  level  of intelligence  (as needed to implement redundance in
data transfer).

     The distance between the designers and the watershed dictated that the
system  be  constructed of modular pieces.  All circuit modules plug into a
mating connector.  This allows field  personnel  with  limited  electronics
background to change systems modules and maintain an operational status.

     The configuration of the ALERT hardware as  implemented  is  shown  in
Figure 13.

     As in all data acquisitions systems the information begins at the   (1)
transducers.   The  ALERT  hardware  is  based  on an Incremental Increment
Recording system.  This  system  was  developed  by  Goodspeed  and  Savage
(1966),  evaluated  in  detail  by  Langham  (1971) and compared to the more
widely known Time Increment Recording system by Wong, et  al   (1976).   IIR
transducers  indicate whenever a fixed change occurs in current conditions,
e_.g_., a drop in temperature of   .5  degrees.   This  technique  allows  the
conversion  from  analog  to  digital  data at the earliest possible moment
which increases data integrity, ease of transmission and results in an  ex-
tremely efficient data storage format.

     Each transducer reports any incremental change of  conditions  to  its
(2) remote station.  A transducer may be up to 200 meters away from its re-
mote station.  A remote station then waits for permission from the  central
site  to transmit its data.  Permission to transmit occurs about once every
2 seconds.  After a remote station sends the transducer data to the central
site, the remote site signals the transducer that data has been sent and it
                                                      TECHNICAL  APPROACH

-------
                              Figure 13. Configuration of ALERT Hardware
fd
O
i- 1
n
o
K
FT. WAYNE
                                TERMINAL IN
                                FIELD OFFICE
PURDUE
                                                  DEDICATED
                                                  LONG-LINE
                                                   ~250 km
                                                                      REAL-TIME
                                                                    VIINI-COMPUTER
                                                        .m
                                                  DIAL-UP
                                               MODEM
                                                                              TERMINAL FOR
                                                                              PROGRAMMING
                                                                              AND DISPLAY
                                                     TERMINAL
                                                                                              oo
                                                                                              o

-------
                                                                          8JL
is ready for further information at any time.
     A remote site receives its permission to transmit data   (polling)  and
sends data to the central site on the  (3) party line.  The line consists of
2 separate circuits.   (3a) One circuit takes the  polling  information  and
distributes  it  to  the remotes.   (3b) The other circuit accepts data from
the remotes and routes it to the central site.  All remotes  are  connected
in  series with one another.  This  implies if one remote fails the communi-
cation link fails, but it saves an  enormous amount  of  power  the  remotes
could  not  supply due to power restrictions.  The party line was a special
telephone circuit that by-passed the dialing  equipment  in  the  watershed
area.

     Both lines terminate at the (4) central site, which is physically  lo-
cated  at watershed Site 6. The central site performs several functions in-
cluding:  (4a) sending continuous polling information to all  remotes  which
prevents two remotes from simultaneously transmitting data;  (4b) monitoring
the long lines  (see below) and interspersing control commands with  polling
commands;   (4c) receiving data from the remote sites and (4c,a) sending the
data to a modem* which impresses the data as serial bits on the long  lines
and  (4c,b) to a paper tape punch as a backup in case of long line failure.
*MODEM is an acronym for modulator-demodulator.  Operating in pairs,  these
devices provide a standard means of converting the voltage or currents gen-
erated and required by computers into tones suitable for transmission  over
telephone lines.

     The  (5) long  lines  are  dedicated  telephone  circuits  electrically
separate  from  the party line.  The long lines stretch 250 km from a modem
on Black Creek Watershed to a modem in the Agricultural Engineering Depart-
ment at Purdue University.  The telephone circuits link the modems 24 hours
a day and by-pass normal dialing equipment.

     The modem at the Purdue campus connects to a   (6)  mini-computer  with
real-time software. The data from the watershed appears to come from one of
up to 20 users on the computer.  As data  are  received  various  software
packages  (inter-related programs) are executed to perform the desired func-
tions of the system as described above.  The computer also has the  ability
to  establish  communications  with other  systems  on campus  (see below).
Also, the machine can answer its own telephone and connect  that  telephone
line  to  a  modem  (see  below).   The  real-time mini-computer has a disk
storage system for storing data and programs in addition to various  termi-
nals for data display and programming.

     The Black Creek installation is seen by the computer as simply one  of
several  simultaneous  users  active  on the system.  The operating program
which controls communication with the Black Creek station has four  primary
responsibilities:  (1) assembling the incoming data into suitable files and
permanent storage of these files on magnetic disk and/or tape,  (2)  mainte-
nance  of  a dynamic file of the instantaneous level of all variables being
monitored in the watershed and the  operational status of  all  transducers,
(3)  providing a preliminary analysis of water stage data in order to issue
feedback control commands to operate the water sampling equipment, and  (4)
detection  of  storm  conditions in the watershed that indicate the need to
activate a complete real-time simulation of the hydrologic behavior of  the
catchment.   During a runoff producing storm, a simulation model can be ac-
tivated which combines historical data files  describing  physical  charac-
teristics  of  the catchment with real-time, dynamically changing data con-
cerning rainfall intensity distribution and stream stage to estimate height


                                                    TECHNICAL  APPROACH

-------
82


and  times of peak  flows at all points  in the drainage network.  If the geo-
graphical location warranted such action, the computer could be programmed,
based  on predicted conditions, to automatically ALERT responsible authori-
ties in  the event  of  impending dangerous flood levels.

     The ability of the computer to answer  a telephone  allows  a  "reverse
information  circuit." The field office in  Ft. Wayne is approximately 25 km
from the watershed.   Using a computer  terminal and  a modem, the  staff  can
phone  the  real-time mini-computer at W. Lafayette.  At that point  the Ft.
Wayne office has the  ability to perform any function available on the  sys-
tem.  This includes  the  display of current conditions or of archive files.
This capability greatly enhances the efficiency of  field personnel while it
increases  the overall integrity of the data base by very quickly identify-
ing  malfunctions while simultaneously  eliminating unnecessary field  inspec-
tions of correctly working sensors.  The current status report allows quick
response by field  personnel to thundershower events which may occur  in  the
catchment, but not in the vicinity of  their office.

     Another  feature  available through the  software allows  the  real-time
mini-computer   to   link   to other computers.  A linkage is available to the
system which  logs  the most recent messages  from the NOAA  weather  service.
This service  provides   the most recent Ft. Wayne  area forecast and Maumee
River predictions, as supplied via NOAA,  as  a  supplement  to  the tools
available  to  the  Ft.  Wayne staff.

     Operational  experience with  the  system has been   only  partially  suc-
cessful.  The primary meteorological  station  at Site 6, the battery  operat-
ed paper tape punch,  the  long-lines  to W. Lafayette and the  on-line mini-
computer  have operated   together  very satisfactorily for over two years.
The area that has  involved the greatest difficulties  is a low power  method
 to  couple  the  remote  stations  to  the "party line".  Devices  that  exhibit
high reliability  in transfer  of data  have also shown a low  resistance  to
outside  destruction.  The destruction usually comes in the  form of a light-
 ing strike in the watershed  area, although  it is possible for  routine  tele-
phone  repair  procedures  in  the vicinity to damage  the  interface  boards.
 Interface boards,  which had  protection circuits  for the above  problems, ex-
 hibited   a markedly lower reliability in transmitting  the data.  Techniques
which utilize magnetic  coupling  to provide  isolation between  the  telephone
 lines and the remote station hardware are  currently being designed.

      Further projects in this area  should  have   the   following  additional
 goals.   The first goal  should be to  improve on the reliability of  the  party
 line interfaces.   A new product on  the market has been earmarked for inter-
 face  testing  by  the  designers.   The new device will  hopefully raise the
 data transfer and destruction protection reliability far   above  those  re-
 quired.    The  use of HI-VHF transceivers should be incorporated to support
 data transmission from sites where phone service is not available or  where
 the service  is unreliable or too costly.   The most extensive goal would be
 to  increase the real-time warning/simulation phase of  ALERT  and   increase
 the ability of the software to function with less  operator  intervention.

      The hardware is of no value without a software package to support  it.
 The ALERT software presently consists of no fewer  than 18 FORTRAN programs.
 Commands to the mini-computer are  fairly  simple  (although  restart  pro-
 cedures are   relatively  lengthy).    For example, to activate the  software
 display of current conditions the user (at  Purdue or  the  field  office)


 TECHNICAL APPROACH

-------
                                                                         83
types  dec (Display Current Conditions).   The terminal then responds with a
display for each transducer that informs the user of: (1)  the device  name;
(2)  current  value  or  rate; (3)  trend indicator (increasing, steady, de-
creasing); (4) today's high and low value or rate; (5) the time of  today's
high and low; and (6) a series of cross checking counters.  There is an op-
tion on the dec program to also display element (4) and (5) for  yesterday,
the  day before, and monthly totals back 2 months on those transducers that
can utilize it.  Other programs allow retrieval of data, testing  of  phone
circuits,  scanning of data files for illegal data, running special statis-
tics, and editing of data files.

     The data storage format is very space conserving considering  the  re-
quirements  put  on the data base.  The data storage technique allows a ra-
port generated at any time interval (resolution of 1 second).  Overall  the
raw  data  is stored as a site number, a channel number, and the time since
the last data arrived.  The  values  are  stored  "unformatted"  (non-human
readable  format).  Programs read the raw data and reconstruct current con-
ditions by starting at a known point  in  time  with  known  conditions  (a
benchmark), and stepping forward through the data.  A benchmark of the con-
ditions at the most recent midnight are kept in an easily  accessible  form
to  reduce  the overhead in computing current conditions which, in the case
of intelligent decision making (for control), occurs many times per day.

3.3.3.1.2 Conclusions

     The collection of comprehensive environmental data is an essential re-
quirement  for rational planning of nonpoint pollution control measures and
for  subsequent  enforcement  and  post-planning   evaluation   activities.
Several  examples of such activities underway in the Black Creek Study area
have been described.  Tne dramatic impact of utilizing real-time  computers
to collect environmental data has been outlined.

     Proper transducer selection and data network configuration  allow  ex-
isting time-sharing computer systems to serve as real-time systems for most
environmental data requirements with no additional hardware or system level
software  changes.   This approach provides  the benefits of an on-line com-
puter with no capital outlay beyond those associated with  a  data  logging
system  of  greatly  reduced  capability.   While  operating  costs will be
slightly higher  for the real-time system, these extra costs  are  primarily
proportional  to  the  degree of utilization of the on-line features of the
system and are,  therefore, subject to cost/benefit considerations  and  ad-
ministrative  control.   Furthermore, many of these associated benefits are
sufficient to significantly influence the  economic  justification  of  the
network  of field transducers required for any degree of automation of data
collection procedures.


                                 References
Goodspeed, M.J. and J.V. Savage.   1969.   A  multi-channel  digital  event-
recorder  for  field applications.   J. Sci. Instr.  v2 pp  178-182.

Langham,  E.J.   1971.  New approach to hydrologic data  acquisition.   Proc.
Am.  Soc.  Civil  Eng.  J. Hydro. Div.  HY12:1965-78.


                                                      TECHNICAL APPROACH

-------
 84
Wong, G.A., S.J. Mahler, J.R. Barrett, Jr. and L.F. Huggins.  1976.  A sys-
tematic approach to data reduction using GASP IV.  Proc. Winter  Simulation
Conf.  PP. 403-410.

3.3.3.2 PURDUE DATA HANDLING

     In the Black Creek Watershed, rainfall data was collected from  up  to
seven  recording  rain gauges and water stage data was collected from up to
nine pressure-actuated stage records.  Water quality samples were collected
both manually and mechanically.

     Three pumping samplers, each capable of collecting 72 consecutive sam-
ples,  are  located at junctions of two primary drains into Black Creek and
on Black Creek approximately one and a half miles from its confluence  with
the  Maumee River.  The pumping samplers were storm-actuated.  Grab samples
were taken at all stage recorder sites,  or  strategic  locations  upstream
from the stage recorder sites, and at selected tile outfalls.  Grab samples
were collected weekly and during storm events.

     Rainfall or water stage data and water quality samples have been  col-
lected since early 1973.  An enormous amount of information was made avail-
able for various kind of analysis.  In order to put the  data  into  useful
form  for future analysis, a procedure as illustrated by Figure 14 was ini-
tiated.  Raw data as represented by rainfall charts,  water  stage  charts,
grab  samples, and automated pump samples were processed largely by comput-
ers and then stored to be used by researchers connected  with  the  project
and  researchers  outside of the project who are interested in the regional
aspects of the data.

     Figure 14 is a schematic diagram of  data  processing  for  the  Black
Creek  Watershed  study.   Steps in this process as indicated on the figure
are as follows:
     Step 1:  Water stage and raingage charts are read on  a  chart  reader
and the data punched on paper tape.

     Step 2:  Data on paper tape are read into the digital computer file.

     Step 3:  Rainfall data, which are accumulated inches of rainfall,  are
transferred into rates in on/hr.

     Step 4:  Areal rainfall is calculated by taking the  weighted  average
of the rainfall data on an area basis between adjacent sites.

     Step 5:  Rainfall data as well as water stage and water  quality  data
are stored by year and by the site number.

     Step 6:  Water stage data are edited for comma and characters and then
stored by year and by the site number as in Step 5.

     Step 7:  Grab sample data are verified for punching errors and correc-
tions made.

     Step 8:  Grab sample data are then sorted out by time, date, and  site
  TECHNICAL APPROACH

-------
        sr
                                              Figure 14.  Data Processing  Scheme
                       CHART
                       READER
                        LAB
                       ANAL-
                        YSIS
I--3
t?J
O
hi
H
O
 GRAB
SAMPLES
CHART
READER
             PUMP
            SAMPLES
              (BY
            STORM)
ffi
             LAB
            ANAL-
             YSIS
DIGITAL
COMPUTER
FILE
2






DIGITAL
COMPUTER
FILE
2

KEY-
PUNCH
2 DECKS

STAGE
DATA
ADDED
12
	


VERIFY
FOR
PUNCH
ERROR 7
CHANGE FROM
CUMULATIVE
DATA TO RATE
DATA 3


SORTED
BY
TIME &
SITE „

KEY-
PUNCH
2 DECKS
VERIFY
FOR
PUNCH
ERROR7



AVERAGE TWO
RAINFALL
SITES ON
AREA BASIS

REFORMAT
FILE


ERROR
CHECK
9

SORTED
BY
TIME &
SITE 8
6




BEST
ESTI-
MATE
10

ERROR
CHECK
9

STOR
YEAR
E DATA
3Y
&SITE
5

STORE DATA
BY
YEAR & SITE
5

STAGE
CONVER 	
SIGN
11


STORE
DATA BY
YEAR &
SITE




BEST
ESTI- —
MATE
10
STORE
DATA BY
YEAR&
SITE

COMBINE
PREPROCESSED
DATA FILES
INTO SINGLE
FILE BY YEAR
AND SITE
13
                                                                                                                               COMPRE-
                                                                                                                               HENSIVE
                                                                                                                                 DATA
                                                                                                                                 FILES
                                                                                                                                           oo
                                                                                                                                           Ui

-------
 86
     Step 9:  Grab sample data and also pump sample data  are  checked  for
errors  and  omissions such as poor response from a site, unrealistic dates
and times, unreadable characters, abnormally high values, and bad values of
N or P constituents.

     Step 10: Best estimates are made for missing data or for water quality
parameters,  which  are flagged for possible error in analysis or for wrong
entries in the data log.  If errors are due to faulty analysis,  rules  for
obtaining the best estimate are:

Let soluble N = Nitrate + Ammonium, if Nitrate + Ammonium > soluble N
Let total N=soluble N, if soluble N > total N
Let soluble P=inorganic P, if inorganic P > soluble P
Let total P=soluble P, if soluble P > total P

     Step 11: The distance from a benchmark to the water level is converted
to  depth  of  water for the stage record water the grab samples.  The grab
sample data are now stored as in Step 5.

     Step 12: As in Step 11 for the grab samples, stage data are  added  to
the  pump sample file.  Stage data are necessary to calculate for loadings.
The pumping sample data then go through the same steps as for  grab  sample
data and are also stored as in Step 5.

     Step 13: The data files are now combined and sorted according to  time
and location and then placed on disk into a comprehensive data base.
STUDY  RESULTS

-------
                                                                            87
 4.1 SIMULATED RAINFALL

 4.1.1 Equipment

      A portable rainfall simulator, developed by the Agricultural  Research
 Service of USDA at Purdue University, produces artificial storms of approx-
 imately the kinetic energy of high intensity natural rainfall.  The simula-
 tor  was  used to compare the soil loss, water loss, and infiltration rates
 of treatments on standard-size rectangular runoff plots.

      Simulated storms may be applied to treatments being studied under  any
 condition  at  any time and as often as desired throughout the year, except
 on tall crops and during freezing weather.

      Factors well suited to tests with the simulator include:  soil  erodi-
 bility,  length  of  slope,  percent  of slope, past erosion, crop cover at
 various stages of growth, rotations, fertility  level,   tillage  practices,
 and residue management.

      Soil and water loss evaluations by natural rainfall usually take 10 to
 25  years  —  yet  it is often vital to have such information much sooner.
 The rainfall simulator frequently makes more rapid evaluations possible.

 4.1.2 Objectives

      Environmental Imgact of Land Use on Water Quality  -- A  Work  Plan,  a
 plan  to  utilize the rainfall simulator in Black Creek watershed,  wal~pub-
 lished in April of 1973.   Objectives were as follows:


      (a)   To determine the base values for the  sediment  contributions   of
      the major  soil capability units in the study area.

      (b)   To determine runoff and sediment composition  (physical  and chemi-
      cal)  from  the major  soil capability units.

      (c)   To determine the relative  importance of raindrop impact and  sur-
      face  runoff  in detaching  soil  material from nearly level  lake plain
      soil.

      (d)   To compare  the  runoff and  soil  erosion  effects of presently  used
      cultural practices to  those  conservation  cultural practices  recommend-
      ed  by the Soil Conservation  Service.   (Several  forms of  Conservation
      tillage compared  to  fall plowing,  effects  of  crop rotations,  effects
      of  various methods of  residue management, effects of winter  cover,  ef-
      fects   of  over-grazing, effects  of  fertilizer  and  manure applications
      on  cropland and pastures).

     Work was carried out in all of these areas during the  1973-1976  pro-
ject period.  In each case, the following test storms were used:

     The simulated rainfall program was started in the summer of 1973,  and
approximately  six  weeks of field testing was committed  to this study each
year for four years.  The individual studies are outlined below.
                                                           STUDY RESULTS

-------
88
4.1.2.1 BASE EROSION LOSSES

     Values for the major soils in the watershed were obtained  during  the
summer  of  1973.  Thirteen cm (5 in) of simulated rainfall were applied to
fall plots under uniform test conditions on four different soils.   Runoff,
infiltration,  sediment concentration, and total soil loss were obtained in
each study.

4.1.2.2 PARTICLE SIZE IN SEDIMENT

     Sediments in runoff from  all  four  soils  in  the  1973  tests  were
analyzed  for  particle size distribution (five sand fractions, silt, total
clay, colloidal clay, and organic matter content).  These values have  been
compared to the values that occur in the soil in place.

4.1.2.3 SOIL LOSS AS AGGREGATES

     Sediment occurring in runoff from four  soils  (each  soil  with  fall
plow,  fall chisel, fall disk, and no tillage treatments) were analyzed for
soil loss in aggregated form as constructed to that  occurring  as  primary
particles.   Field  and  laboratory work was completed during the 1975-1976
project year.

4.1.2.4 FERTILIZER LOSS IN RUNOFF

     The effects of surface applied nitrogen and phosphorus  fertilizer  on
nutrient  content  of  runoff were obtained under fallow plot conditions in
1973 and under four tillage systems  (fall plow, fall chisel, fall disk,  no
tillage)   in 1974 and 1975.  In some instances, the tests were conducted on
soybean land, and in other instances, the  tests  were  conducted  on  corn
land.   In  all  instances,  runoff  from  fertilized plots was compared to
runoff from not-fertilized plots.

4.1.2.5 RAINDROP ENERGY VS. SURFACE RUNOFF

     The relative importance of raindrop energy and runoff in the soil ero-
sion  process  on both nearly-level and sloping soils was measured in 1973.
The tests were conducted on  fallow  plots  on  four  major  soils  in  the
watershed.  The results were reported in the first annual report.

4.1.2.6 TILLAGE AND CROP RESIDUE

     Soil Erosion was determined from four basic fall land treatments  (fall
plow,  fall chisel, fall disk, no tillage) following both corn and soybeans
during 1974, 1975, and 1976.  Runoff, infiltration, and sediment concentra-
tion  of  the  runoff  were also obtained.  Percent surface covered by crop
residues were determined for all treatments.  A portion  of  the  data  was
analyzed and reported in the 1975 and 1976 progress reports.

4.1.2.7 APPLICATION OF ANIMAL WASTE

     The effects of animal waste application to land, both  on  runoff  and
soil  loss,  as  well as on water quality, were tested during the spring of
1976.  Individual tests were:

      (a)  Spring application of liquid and solid swine waste   (surface  ap-


STUDY  RESULTS

-------
                                                                          89
      plied and  incorporated)  on corn stalk land.
      (b)   Spring  application  of solid swine waste on corn stalk  land  that
      had  four different fall  treatments (plow,  chisel,  disk,  no tillage).
      (c)   Spring  application  of solid cattle waste to closely  grazed  pas-
      tures .

 4.1.2.8 SOD BUFFER STRIPS, WATER QUALITY

      The  effects  of sod buffer  strips in  reducing  the  sediment  load of
 runoff  water   was  a preliminary investigation and results obtained  are at
 best  an indication of the efficiency of the system.

 4.1.3 Summary of  Results

 4.1.3.1 BASE (BARE,  FALLOW CONDITION)  EROSION

      Runoff and soil loss values  for  four  of  the major   soils  in  the
 watershed  are  presented in  Table 10.   Thirteen  (13) cm  of simulated rain-
 fall  were applied to fallow plots under uniform test conditions.
                                  TABLE 10
                               Erosion Losses
Soil Type %
Haskins sandy loam
Nappanee clay loam
Hoytville silty clay
Morley clay loam
Slope
0.2
0.7
0.5
5.1
Runoff (cm)
8.6
6.6
7.7
9.2
Soil Loss (t/ha)
10.1
4.6
6.4
34.5
     Soil erosion losses from nearly level lake plain  soils  under  fallow
conditions  are  low  when  compared  to  the  more  sloping  soils  in the
watershed.  For example, a comparison of soil losses from nearly level Nap-
panee  and  Hoytville soils versus sloping Morley soils shows the latter to
be 6 to 7 times as erosive.  Therefore, it can be concluded that the  major
soil  erosion  problem does not occur on the nearly level lake plain soils,
but rather on the sloping, glacial till soils.

     However, even on nearly level soils, significant soil loss differences
can  occur.   Note  that  even though the Haskins soil had the least slope,
soil loss values were approximately twice those on the Hoytville  and  Nap-
panee  soils.   Laboratory tests show both Hoytville and Nappanee soils are
better structured than the Haskins, having major shrinkage cracks which in-
crease  infiltration.  The Haskins soil was prone to surface sealing, caus-
ing increased runoff, as evidenced by the runoff data in Table 10.

     Therefore, it is concluded that soil structure has a pronounced influ-
ence on soil loss — the better the structure, the lower the soil loss.
                                                            STUDY RESULTS

-------
90
4.1.3.2 PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION

     Results show the erosion process to be highly selective with the sedi-
ment  showing distinct clay enrichment and, in some instances silt fraction
enrichment as well.  Total clay content was often 30 percent or  higher  in
sediment  than in the original soil.  Sand fraction content was appreciably
lower in the sediment.  These relationships occurred on both nearly  level,
lake  plain  soils  and sloping glacial till soils.  On nearly level soils,
the clay enrichment of sediment remained  somewhat  constant  from  initial
runoff  until  the end of the storm.  On sloping soils, clay enrichment was
greatest in the initial runoff, but decreased as the test storm continued.

     Selective erosion, particularly clay enrichment of sediment, is occur-
ring  from cropland fields in the Black Creek Watershed.  This has definite
implications regarding sediment and related nutrient transport.

4.1.3.3 SOIL LOSS AS AGGREGATES

     Sediment in runoff was analyzed to determine the  percentage  of  soil
loss  occurring  as  aggregates  greater than 210 microns in diameter.  The
results are shown in Table 11.  Values presented are averages obtained dur-
ing a 6.4 cm simulated rainstorm applied to fall-turn-plowed land.


                                  TABLE  11
                          Soil Loss As Aggregates
     Soil Type        % Aggregates in Sediment>210 micron

Haskins sandy loam                 17
Nappanee clay loam                 22
Hoytville silty clay               17
Morley clay loam                   15
     These results show that less than 20 percent of the  soil  transported
in  runoff  occurs  as  aggregates  greater than 210 microns in diameter on
plowed soils.  Therefore, on these soils, effective measures  for  reducing
erosion,  at  least on nearly level soils, should be based on prevention of
detachment and dispersion of naturally occurring  aggregates  by  raindrops
since  low-velocity  runoff is not capable of transporting much of the soil
as large aggregates.

4.1.3.4 RAINDROP VS. SURFACE RUNOFF ENERGY

     The relative importance of raindrop energy and runoff  energy  in  the
soil  erosion  process is shown in Table 12.  These tests were conducted on
fallow soils, and sediment concentrations are reported for raindrop-induced
runoff and erosion vs. inflow-induced runoff and erosion.

     On all four soils tested, rainfall-induced runoff  contained  approxi-
mately  7-12  times  the sediment concentration as that found in the inflow
produced runoff.  These results provide further  evidence  that  protecting
the soil surface from raindrop impact is one of the most effective means of
minimizing sediment concentrations in runoff.
                                                              STUDY RESULTS

-------
                                                                        91
                                  TABLE 12
                     Raindrop Energy vs Surface Runoff
Soil Type

Haskins sandy loam
Nappanee clay loam
Hoytville silty clay
Morley clay loam
Slope
\
0
0
0
5
I
;>
2
.7
.5
.1
Sediment
with
1.
.
1.
3.
Concentration
of
rain with
18
98
37
81




0.
.
.
*
Runoff
inflow
18
08
14
42
4.1.3.5 TILLAGE AND CROP RESIDUE

     Soil erosion losses determined from four basic  fall  land  treatments
(fall  plow, fall chisel, fall disk and no tillage) following both corn and
soybeans are reported in Tables 13 and 14 12.7  cm  of  simulated  rainfall
were  applied to the tillage treatments prior to seedbed preparation in the
spring.  The study was performed on the four major  soils  listed  earlier,
but results from only the Hoytville and Morley soils are reported below.
                                  TABLE 13
                    Losses After  Various Tillage Systems
Tillage System
No till (check)
Disk
Chisel
Plow
(Hoytville Silty Clay
Surface Cover (%) Soil
After After After
Corn Soybeans Corn
78 24 1.1
77 12 .9
57 9 1.7
4 1 4.3
0.8% Slope)
Loss ( t/ha)
After
Soybeans
7.8
6.9
9.3
5.3
     From these results several significant conclusions can be drawn.

     a) Soil losses are greatly reduced by those tillage systems that leave
appreciable  crop  residues on the surface.  Generally, there is an inverse
relationship between surface residue cover and erosion.   Particularly  ef-
fective are no till (checks) and disk treatments following corn since large
amounts of surface residue remain through the winter and into spring.

     b) Fall chiseling following corn, although not as effective as the  no
till  and disk, significantly reduces erosion compared to plowing.  The de-
gree of erosion control is dependent  upon  the  amount  of  surface  cover
remaining  as well as the roughness of the surface.  Fall chiseling of corn
land would be expected to be much more effective  in  reducing  erosion  if
performed  across slope rather than up and down slope (this study evaluated
                                                          STUDY  RESULTS

-------
92
                                  TABLE 14
                    Losses After Various Tillage Systems
(Morley Clay Loam 4.0% Slope)
Tillage System


No till (check)
Disk
Chisel
Plow
Surface
After
Corn
69
70
25
7
Cover (%)
After
Soybeans
26
17
12
1
Soil
After
Corn
2.4
2.5
15.0
21.8
Loss (t/ha)
After
Soybeans
13.4
12.4
30.1
40.9
 up and  down slope  tillage).

      c)  None of  the  conservation  tillage  treatments are as  effective   fol-
 lowing  soybeans  as following corn primarily because of reduced surface  cov-
 er after soybeans.  Chiseled soybean  land can be particularly erosive   when
 chisel  marks run up  and down slope.

      d)  The major  soil losses occurred on the sloping land.  Therefore,   it
 is much more   important  to apply conservation tillage on the more sloping
 portions than the  nearly level portions of the watershed to achieve  signi-
 ficant   soil erosion  reductions and  resultant sediment concentration  in
 drainageways.

      e)  Although these tests were conducted over a relatively brief  period
 of the  erosion  year,  they  illustrate the major influence various  crop
 species can have on  soil erosion.

      f)  In  the only  direct comparison of  spring moldboard plowing and   fall
 moldboard plowing, soil losses from 12.7  cm of simulated rain were 6.3  t/ha
 and 17.6  t/ha for  spring and fall, respectively.  It should be  noted   that
 the   tests  were  made on a Raskins loam soil shortly after completing spring
 plowing.

 4.1.3.6  SOD BUFFER STRIPS AND WATER QUALITY

      In  a preliminary investigation the influence of 50 feet  of  bluegrass
 sod   in   reducing  sediment load of runoff water was investigated.  Sediment
 concentration of runoff decreased from 1% to  0.46%  (54%  reduction)  when
 passed  over  the  sod.  Although  this study demonstrated that sediment  load
 can be effectively reduced by sod strips, it is recognized that the  effec-
 tiveness  of  the  practice is dependent upon many factors.  These would in-
 clude original composition of sediment, rate and depth of plow,  vigor  and
 height of sod, and many others.

 4.1.3.7 APPLICATION  OF ANIMAL WASTE

     Three  experimental sites were used in the conduct of the study  (Table
 15).   Experiment  1  was conducted to evaluate the effects of two forms of
 swine waste  (liquid  and solid)  and two rates of solid swine waste  addition


STUDY RESULTS

-------
                                                                        93
(90  and 238 t/ha)  on losses of nutrients in surface runoff from corn resi-
due covered surface.  Experiment 2 was conducted to evaluate  the  interac-
tion of solid swine waste application with tillage methods on losses of nu-
trients in surface runoff from a rolling Morley soil  which  was  initially
nearly  saturated.    Experiment 3 was conducted to determine the effects of
solid cattle waste application rate (0, 90, and 180 t/ha)  on losses of  nu-
trients in surface runoff from an overgrazed pasture.  The conditions under
which the experiments were conducted are summarized in Table 15.
                                 TABLE  15
                   Description  of Experimental Conditions
Experiment Soil Tillage
No. Type Used

1 Nappanee None (residues)
None
None
Disk (after
waste added)
2 Morley No-til
No-til
Chisel
Chisel
Disk
Disk
Fall Plow
Fall Plow
3 Morley None (pasture)
None
None
Animal
Waste Used

None
Swine
Swine
Swine

None
Swine
None
Swine
None
Swine
None
Swine
None
Cattle
Cattle


(liquid)
(solid)
(solid)


(solid)

(solid)

(solid)

(solid)

(solid)
(solid)
Rate of
Waste
t/ha
0
95.6
90
238

0
90
0
90
0
90
0
90
0
90
180
     In most cases, tillage was performed on the plot area,  animal  wastes
were  applied  at rates indicated in Table 15, and three standard simulated
rainstorms were applied (see Section  4.1  for  details  of  rainstorm  se-
quence,  intensity, and duration).   In Experiment 1, plots treated with the
high rate of solid swine waste were disked prior to  application  of  rain-
storms,  and in Experiment 3, only two rainstorms were applied (total of 90
minutes of rain).  The concentrations of solids  and  nutrients  in  animal
wastes applied in each experiment are given in Table 16.  The total amounts
of nutrients added with each waste-treatment are given in Table 17.
No waste-treatment added significant amounts of nitrate N  because  of  the
low nitrate content of the wastes.

     Samples of surface runoff were collected, frozen, and  stored  at  -10
degrees  C until analyzed.  All chemical analyses were performed by methods
detailed in Section  3.3.2   Flow data from runoff plots was collected and
calculated  as  described  in  Section   3,3.3     Computer techniques were
used to integrate flow and concentration data, to  computeloadings.  Aver-
age flow-weighted mean concentrations of nutrients were determined for each
                                                          STUDY RESULTS

-------
94
                                  TABLE 16
                  Nutrient Concentrations in Animal Wastes
Type Waste

Liquid swine
Solid swine
Solid cattle
Solids
%
8.1
39.0
23.4
Amm.-N


3165
5750
1288
Nit.-N
T-vm /
Ppfu (we
27
82
38
Org. N
i i __ ' __ \
T- DaSlSj
2580
10190
3535
Total P


1370
7000
690
                                  TABLE 17
Amounts of Nutrients Added in Waste Applications to Three Experimental Sites
Experiment Type Waste
No.

1


2
3

Applied

Swine (liquid)
Swine (solid)
Swine (solid)
Swine (solid)
Cattle (solid)
Cattle (solid)
Rate Waste
Appl ied
t/ha
95.6
90.0
238
90.0
90.0
180.0
Nutrients Applied
Amm.-N


303
524
1350
524
116
332
Nit.-N
\f-t
Kg/
3
8
18
8
3
6
Org. N Total P
At *i

246 131
970 730
2244 1396
970 730
318 62
636 124
rainstorm and for all three rainstorms applied to each  plot.   All  values
are  averages  derived from data obtained from duplicate plots.  Values for
amounts of waste-derived nutrients lost in runoff were  calculated  as  the
difference  in nutrient loss between waste-treated and control plots.  Per-
centages of added nutrients lost in  runoff  were  calculated  by  dividing
amounts of waste-derived nutrients lost by amounts of nutrients added.  All
values for amounts of animal waste added are on a net  basis.   Values  for
concentrations  of  nutrients  (N & P) in eroded sediment are on a moisture-
free basis.

4.1.3.7.1 Experiment ^

     Table 18 presents data on losses of sediment and nutrients  in  runoff
from untilled Nappanee soil as affected by type and rate of swine waste ap-
plication.  On the average, waste application had little  effect  upon  the
amounts  of water running off the soil or on the loss of nitrate in runoff.
The loss of sediment was reduced, whereas the amounts of ammonium N soluble
organic  N  (SON),  sediment N, soluble inorganic phosphorus (SIP), soluble
organic phosphorus (SOP), and sediment P were markedly increased  by  swine
waste  addition.  Significantly higher losses of ammonium-N, SON, SIP, SOP,
and sediment P were obtained with solid swine waste application   (90  t/ha)
as  compared  to  liquid swine waste application (95.6 t/ha).  This was ex-
pected due to higher amounts of nutrients added in the  solid  swine  waste
application  (Table  17).  Losses of soluble nutrients from plots receiving
high amounts of solid swine waste (238  t/ha)  disked-in  were  lower  than
plots  receiving the low rate  (90 t/ha) of waste.  Incorporation of applied
 STUDY  RESULTS

-------
                                                                             95
waste is apparently very significant in  reducing  losses  of  soluble  nu-
trients.   Losses of sediment-bound nutrients were similar at both applica-
tion rates of solid swine waste.

     The concentrations in runoff of all soluble nutrients  except  nitrate
were  greatly increased by swine waste application (Table 19).  The concen-
trations of ammonium-N and SIP in runoff were  high  enough  to  constitute
significant  environmental  problems.  Disking-in solid swine waste lowered
the concentrations of SON, SIP, and SOP in runoff  as  compared  to  runoff
from undisked solid swine waste-treated plots.  The concentrations of total
N and P in sediment running off the plots were markedly increased by  waste
addition  (four  to ten times for N and three to sixteen times for P).  The
high total N and P contents of eroded sediment suggests  mass  movement  of
some  waste  particles  as well as enrichment of eroded soil particles with
waste-derived N and P.

     Calculations indicate that substantial proportions of nutrients  added
in  animal  waste  are lost in runoff if wastes are not incorporated (Table
20).  From 34 to 44 percent of added ammonium-N, 20 to 25 percent of  added
organic N, and 7 to 16 percent of added total P was lost from plots receiv-
ing 95.6 and 90 t/ha of liquid and solid swine waste, respectively.   Lower
proportions  of  added nutrients were lost from plots having a high rate of
solid swine waste (238 t/ha)  incorporated by disking.
                                                            STUDY RESULTS

-------
en
i-3
a
O
Kj
en
G
cn
                             TABLE   18
Losses of Sediments and Nutrients  in Runoff from Nappanee  Soil
Till age

ilone



None



lione



Ui sk



Waste
App 1 i cat i on

.lone



Liquid was te
(95.6 t/ha)


Sol i d \/as te
(90 t/ha)


Sol i d was te
(237.6 t/ha)


R a i n s t o r n

1
1
3
Total
1
O
3
Total
1
O
3
Total
1
2
3
Total
!hO
Runoff
en
4.30
2.17
2.44
8.91
4.41
2.14
2.19
8. 73
3.83
2.31
2.88
a.03
2.98
2.12
2.39
7.49
t\.

0.28
n.in
0 . 08
0.4G
87.22
10.88
4.88
102.98
184.82
24.86
21.95
231.64
138.37
21.95
1C. 77
177.09
no^-r.

3.43
1.60
i.7n
G.73
3.19
1.41
1 . On
5. GO
2.12
0.43
0.68
3.23
1.59
0.42
0.71
2.72
GOf!

O.G7
0.25
0.07
n.99
22.65
2.09
1.62
31.96
125.28
17.51
14.05
156.84
37.33
11. 7C
9.09
58.18
Se ' 1 M

5.19
3.89
3.46
12.54
26.11
F.7?
9.37
42. 20
21.49
] 4 . 9 3
14.09
50.51
28. 2C
13.03
13.35
54.58
SI P

0.024
O.U06
0.005
0.035
11.111
1.246
0.971
13.328
20.306
4.291
4.837
29.434
10.547
2.430
2.847
15.824
SOP

0.024
O.OOG
0.009
0.039
2.711
9.486
0. 219
3.416
4.165
1.21E
1.492
6.873
1.943
1.130
0.557
3.630
Sed P

1.470
0.5G6
0.444
2.480
5.398
O.G85
0.855
6.938
7.646
3.199
3.121
13.9G6
5.984
2.898
2.433
11.315
Sedi ment

1859
563
589
3011
1811
457
307
2575
5GO
268
223
1051
849
412
250
1511

-------
                                         TABLE 19

              Concentrations of Solids and Nutrients from Nappanee  Soil
Till age
iJonc



.June



None



Disk



Waste
Appl i cat i on
None



Liquid svvi no



Sol i d swi ne
( 1 ow )


Sol i d swi ne
(high)


Ra i nstorn
1
2
3
All
1
2
3
All
1
o
L.
3
All
1
0
3
All
Concentration in Runoff
Sol i ds ,'IH + it-N

1+323 0.7
2591* 0.5
2U11* 0.3
3379 0.5
1*116 193.2
2136 50. C
11*02 22.3
2950 118.0
1UG2 1*82.6
11GO 107.6
77k 7C.2
lift* 256.5
2 C k 9 i* C i* . 3
1943 103.5
10'iG 70.2
2017 230. '*
MO-3-.'l
	 IDS/ 1
8.0
7.1*
7.0
7.G
7.3
P. 6
U.G
G.l*
5.5
1.9
2.1*
3.G
5.3
2.0
3.0
3.G
so:1

l.G
1.2
0.3
1.1
51.5
9.8
7.1*
3C.G
327.1
75.8
1*0.8
173.7
125.3
55.5
38.0
77.7
SI P

0.06
".03
0.02
0.0'*
25.25
5.82
!;. 1*3
15.27
53.02
1C.2C
16.80
32.60
35.39
ll.i* 6
11.91
21.13
son

0.06
0.03
".01*
O.Oi*
6.16
2.27
1.00
3.91
10.87
5.2G
5.18
7.G1
6.52
5.33
2.33
l*.85
Concentration in Sediment
P

2790
6910
5870
U1G5
11*1*20
11*81*0
30520
1G1*10
38375
55709
G318U
1*8059
33216
31G26
531*00
36122
N
fl.fr 	
' '^ti
790
1005
75'i
821*
2980
1500
2785
2691*
13650
11937
13996
13288
701*8
7031*
9732
71*88
en
H
a
a
en
G
to

-------
98
                                   TABLE 20
     Proportions of Added Nutrients in Swine Waste Lost in Surface Runoff
Waste
Tillage

None
None
Disk
Application

Liquid
Solid
Solid


(low)
(high)
Amm.


33.
44.
13.
Nutrients
-N
Nit.
in
-N
	 % of added
8
1
1
0.
0.
0.
0
0
0
Swine Waste
Org
lost in
24
20
4
N
rune
.7
.0
.4
Lost

Total
^ffic

16
6
2


.1
.5
.0

P




 * Calculated as:
         (Nutrient from treated plot - nutrient from control plot) x 100
         " • •• ™ "-—»•—— — ———   _— i ___________	—	.  —1	— .._ _ ._ _ | T _	
                            Nutrient added in waste
 4.1.3.7.2 Experiment 2

      The conditions used in Experiment 2  (rolling Morley  soil  nearly  sa-
 turated  prior  to  waste application) were designed to test the effects of
 fall tillage practices and waste application on nutrient loss during winter
 and  early  spring  situations.   The  data (Table 21) indicates that swine
 waste application reduced the amounts of runoff water and amounts of eroded
 sediment  for  all  tillage treatments.  However, waste application greatly
 increased the losses of ammonium-N, SON, sediment N, SIP, SOP, and sediment
 P.   The amounts of sediment lost from waste-treated plots decreased in the
 following order of tillage method: no-till > fall plow  >  chisel  >  disk;
 whereas  from  control  plots the order was: fall plow > chisel > no-till >
 disk.  The amounts of soluble N compounds lost in runoff from waste treated
 plots  decreased in the following order of tillage method: no-till > chisel
 > disk > fall plow; whereas for soluble P components the order was:  chisel
 >  fall plow > disk not equal no-till.  Sediment N and P losses from waste-
 treated plots were highest for no-till and least  for  fall  plow  (N)  and
 chisel (P)  tillage treatments.

      The solids content of surface runoff from all tillage methods was  re-
 duced  by  waste  addition.   The greatest reduction was observed with fall
 plow tillage (Table 22).  Waste addition  increased  the  ammonium-N,  SON,
 SIP,  and SON concentrations in runoff water.   On the average, similar con-
 centrations of ammonium-N, SON,  and  SOP  were  observed  in  runoff  from
 waste-treated  plots for all tillage treatments.  Higher SIP concentrations
 in runoff from waste-treated plots were found with  chisel  and  fall  plow
 tillage  as  compared to disk or no tillage.  The N and P concentrations in
 eroded sediment were markedly increased by waste addition for each  tillage
 treatment.    The  highest enrichment of N and P in eroded sediment occurred
 with the disked plots where the N and P contents increased 13 and 29 times,
 respectively,  as  a result of waste addition.  The high N and P concentra-
 tions in eroded solids from waste-treated plots suggest that mass  movement
 of  waste particles occurred during runoff.  High BOD loadings on recurring
 streams are also possible under  conditions  of  mass  transport  of  waste
 solids.

      The proportion of added ammonium-N lost in runoff  from  waste-treated
 plots  varied  from  19  percent (fall plow tillage)  to 32 percent (no til-
 lage) , whereas none of the added nitrate-N was lost from any tillage treat-
 ment (Table 23).  From 4.5 percent to 15.6 percent of the waste-derived or-
 STUDY RESULTS

-------
                                                          TABLE 21
                                      Losses of Sediment  and Nutrients  From Morley Soil
Till age

Chi sel







Disk







Fal 1
Plow






lio-ti 1







Waste
Rate
4- / 1
t/lia
90



0



90



0



90



0



90



0



Ra i n storm

1
O
£_
3
Total
1
2
3
Total
1
o
3
Total
1
o
I.
3
Total
1
2
3
Total
1
2
3
Total
1
2
3
Total
1
2
3
Total
H20
Runoff
cm
2. 86
1.49
2. CO
6.95
3.81
2.30
2.58
8.69
2.25
1.25
2.34
5.815
3.31
2.36
2. GO
8.27
2.11
l.On
2.01
5.12
5.40
2.81
2.97
11. 1C
3.70
1.25
2.14
7.09
4.18
2.58
3.18
9.94
Sed i merit

726
224
330
1280
4980
2706
2873
10559
347
°,8
157
592
1092
1270
123C
3598
909
207
301
1417
11079
5358
5475
21912
1324
141
139
1604
780
6232
2092
4104
NHj-N

109.47
24.032
23.15
156. G5
0.27
0.09
O.OG
0.42
80.07
16.44
20.94
117.45
0.05
0.07
0.07
0.19
67.07
13.59
17.42
98.03
0.60
0.14
0.11
0.85
127.62
19.73
20.24
167.59
0.12
0.09
0.06
0.27
N07 -M
-* \,

1.43
0.09
0.17
1.69
1.07
0.53
0.44
2.04
0.50
0.08
0.13
0.71
0.34
0.46
0.34
1.14
0.78
0.09
0.18
1.05
1.17
0.64
0.34
2.15
0.80
0.11
0.10
1.01
0.53
0.51
0.48
1.52
SON
«. / !i -,
g/na 	
64.99
6.57
9.11
CO. 67
n.3l
0.13
0.22
0.66 .
48.12
11.41
11.27
70. SO
0.11
0.04
O.OG
0.21
48.57
6.31
8.73
63.61
0.42
0.37
0.16
0.95
82.85
13.40
11.42
107.67
0.22
0.18
0.04
0.44
Sed \\

23.97
12.37
7.19
43.53
12.22
7.75
8.67
28.64
20.68
6.59
8.31
35.58
3.34
4.16
li. 4 7
16.97
IS. 73
7.48
8.84
35.10
27.52
10.58
15.59
53.69
46.66
F.96
5.23
58.85
6.60
3.31
5.15
15.06
SI P

16.449
5.232
5.752
27.433
0.009
0.006
0.006
0.021
3.121
3.296
2.907
9.324
0.023
0.025
0.030
0.078
10.438
2.614
4.387
17.439
.009
.003
.001
0.013
1.888
2.203
4.354
8.445
0.007
0.013
0.014
0.034
SOP

7.587
0.300
0.281
8.168
O.U14
0.007
0.007
0.029
6.397
0.027
1.467
7.891
a. 014
0.011
0.010
0.035
3.453
U.41S
0.641
4.512
0.020
0.012
0.010
0.042
b.989
1.597
0.511
9.097
0.013
0.007
0.010
0.030
Sed P

4.520
1.930
2.555
9. 005
3.242
1.808
1.440
6.490
11.489
2.036
3.640
17.165
1.685
0. 702
1.1R5
3.572
8. 212
1.69k
1.824
11.730
5.789
2. 716
2.547
11.052
26.105
1.758
2.131
29.994
1.795
0. 609
0.490
2.894
01


K
C
i

-------
en
                                                                                                                            o
                                                                                                                            o
                                                            TABLE  22

                                     Concentrations of Solids and Nutrients From Morley Soil
c

§
Till age
Chi sel







Disk







Fal 1
P 1 ow






iJo-t i 1







Waste
Rate
t/lia
90



0



90



0



90



0



90







Ra i n storm
1
2
3
All
1
2
3
Al 1
1
2
3
Al 1
1
2
3
All
1
2
3
Al 1
1
2
3
Al 1
1
o
3
Al 1
1
2
3
Al 1
Concentration in Runoff
Sol ids

2538
1503
1269
1841
13071
117C5
11136
12151
1542
704
C71
101C
3299
53C1
4754
1*351
4308
2070
1498
2768
20517
190CS
18434
19599
3578
1128
577
22C2
1866
';775
6579
4129
NH + -i)

3S3.76
161.29
89.08
225.40
0.71
0.39
0.23
0.48
355.87
131.52
8 9 . 4 9
201.98
0.15
0 . 30
0.27
0.23
317.87
135.90
86.67
191. 5C
1.11
0.50
0.37
0.76
344.92
157.84
83.98
236.33
0.29
0.35
0.19
0.27
ilO;-Fi | COM
. ___mrr / 1
1 1 1 (_ j /
5.00
0.60
0.65
2.43
2.81
2.30
1.71
2.35
2.22
0.64
0.56
1.22
1.03
1.95
1.31
1.38
3.70
0.90
0.90
2.05
2.17
2.23
1.15
1.92
2.16
0.88
0.42
1.43
1.27
1.98
1.51
1.53
i 	
227.24
44.09
35.04
IIP. 07
0.81
0.57
0.85
0.7G
213.87
n i . 2 "
4s!lC
121.75
0.33
0.17
o.23
0.25
230.19
63.10
43.43
124.24
0.78
1.32
0.54
0.85
223.92
197.20
47.39
151.86
0.53
n. 70
0.13
0.44
51 P

57.71
35.11
22.12
39.47
0.02
0.03
0.02
0.02
13.87
26.37
12.42
16.03
0.07
0.11
0.12
0.09
49.47
26.14
21.83
3 4 . 0 fi
".02
0.01
n.003
0.01
5.10
17.62
18.07
11.91
0.02
o.05
0.04
0.03
SOP

26.53
2.01
1.08
11.75
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.03
28.43
0.22
6.27
13.57
0.04
0.05
n.04
0.04
16.37
4.18
3.19
8.81
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.04
18.89
12.78
2.12
12.83
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.03
Concentration in sediment
N 1 P
	 	 	 	 _r-,^r/'-
rng/
33020
55220
21790
34010
2450
2860
3018
2712
59600
74890
52930
60100
7637
3276
3617
4717
20660
36135
29370
24770
2484
1975
2847
2450
35240
49360
37630
36690
8460
2690
2462
3670
>-&
6230
8620
7740
7035
651
668
501
615
33110
23140
23185
28995
1543
553
959
993
9034
8184
6060
8280
523
507
465
504
19720
12470
15330
18700
2300
494
234
705

-------
                                                                           101
ganic N added was lost in soluble form or as components of eroded sediment.
The highest percentage loss of added organic N was obtained with plots hav-
ing no tillage performed.  Limited percentages of waste-derived total P   (3
to  6  percent)  were lost in surface runoff from waste-treated plots.  The
highest percentage of added P lost was obtained with no-till plots and  the
lowest percentage was observed with fall plow tillage plots.
                                 TABLE  23
  Proportions  of Nutrients Added Los  in Surface Runoff From Morley  Soil
Nutrients in Waste Lost
Tillage

No-til
Chisel
Disk
Fall Plow
Amm.-N
0
31.9
29.8
22.4
18.6
Nit.-N Org N

Total P
•^ff* - 	
0.0 15.6 6.1
0.0 9.8
0.0 9.2
0.0 4.5
5.2
4.2
3.1
* Calculated as:
    (Nutrient from treated peat - nutrient from control plot)  x 100
    	_____	__,__	_——	____——	_———	_——,_-.__—__—.____	______—________
                      Nutrient added in water
4.1.3.7.3 Experiment 3_

     Experiment 3 was conducted to evaluate the nutrient losses in  surface
runoff  from a heavily manured, overgrazed pasture.  The results (Table 24)
from two rainstorms indicate that sediment losses were  very  low  for  all
treatments.   However, waste-treated plots had higher soil losses than con-
trol plots.  This finding is likely the result of mass movement  of  manure
particles  during  intense rainstorms.  As compared to the previous results
from the other waste experiments, the losses of  all  nutrient  forms  were
low.  However, amounts of ammonium-N, nitrate-N, SON, sediment N, SIP, SOP,
and sediment P increased with increasing rate of waste application.   These
results  likely  are due to high infiltration of applied rainwater  and the
resultant low transport capacity of water running from the  plots.   It  is
particularly  noteworthy  that  ammonium-N  and SIP losses were low for all
waste-treated plots.

     Table 25 provides data on the average concentrations of solids and nu-
trients in runoff and nutrients in eroded sediment from the overgrazed pas-
ture site.  Solids and nutrient concentrations in runoff were low  as  com-
pared  to previous studies with waste-treated tilled soils.  The concentra-
tions of nitrogenous components were particularly low.  The  concentrations
of  nutrients  in eroded sediment from control plots were higher than those
from control plots of tilled soil  because  of  extreme  enrichment  during
selective  erosion  of  pasture land.  The N and P concentrations in eroded
sediment were markedly increased by waste application  (three-fold for N and
two-  to  three-fold for P).  Selective erosion of fine clay and mass move-
ment of manure solids probably explain the high N and P content  of  eroded
sediment.

     Low percentages of added ammonium-N  (1 to 29 percent), nitrate-N  (2 to
4  percent),  organic  N   (3 percent), and total P  (4 percent) were lost in
surface runoff from waste-treated plots  (Table 26).  The proportion of  ad-
ded  nutrients  lost  in runoff decreased with increasing waste application
                                                              STUDY RESULTS

-------
102
                                  TABLE 24
      Losses of Sediment and Nutrient in Runoff From Overgrazed  Pasture
Cattle
Waste Rain-
Applied storm
t/ha
0


90


180


1
2
Total
1
2
Total
1
2
Total
H20
Runoff
cm
2.07
2.29
4.36
1.61
1.99
3.60
0.93
2.98
3.91
Sed-
iment

24
21
45
63
47
110
61
103
164
Amm.-N

0.
0.
0.
1.
1.
2.
1.
2.
3.

04
10
14
34
05
39
23
54
77
Nit.-N

0.03
0.04
0.07
0.07
0.11
0.18
0.07
0.11
0.18
SON
-kg/ha
0.26
0.39
0.65
2.17
1.48
3.65
2.31
4.32
6.63
Sed N

0.44
0.66
1.10
3.96
4.51
8.47
2.48
11.50
13.98
SIP

0.073
0.010
0.083
1.122
0.793
1.915
0.920
2.232
3.152
SOP

0.013
0.007
0.020
0.061
0.047
0.108
0.132
0.108
0.340
Sed P

0.073
0.080
0.153
0.232
0.488
0.720
0.176
1.327
1.503
                                  TABLE 25
      Concentrations of Solids and Nutrients From an Overgrazed  Pasture
Cattle
Waste Rain-
Applied storm
0


90


180


1
2
Ave.
1
2
Ave.
1
2
Ave.
Concentrat
Solids Amm.-N Nit

116
92
103
391
236
306
656
346
419

0.
0.
0.
8.
5.
6.
13.
8.
9.

19
44
32
32
28
64
22
52
64

0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
ion
.-N
mg
15
18
16
44
55
50
75
37
46
in Runoff
SON SIP

1.26
1.70
1.49
13.48
7.44
10.14
24.84
14.50
16.96

0.353
0.044
0.190
6.969
3.985
5.319
9.892
7.490
8.061
SOP

0.063
0.031
0.046
0.379
0.236
0.300
1.419
0.362
0.870
Concent
in Sec
N
mg/
18330
31430
24440
62860
95960
77000
40660
111650
85240
:ration
J intent
P
'kg 	
3040
3810
3400
3680
10380
6545
2885
12880
9165
 rate.  These findings suggest that runoff from heavily  grazed   or   heavily
 manured  pasture land does not represent a large threat to water quality if
 soil infiltration rates are reasonably high.   The  limited  runoff   coupled
 with trapping of waste particles by grass plants apparently resulted in low
 nutrient and solids loss in surface runoff.
 STUDY RESULTS

-------
                                                                          103
                                  TABLE 26
Proportions of Added Nutrients Lost  in Surface Runoff  From  an Overgrazed  Pasture
Cattle Waste
Added
t/ha
90
180
Nutrients in Cattle Waste Lost
Amm.-N
c

1.9
1.1
Nit.-N
1 of added lost
3.7
1.8
Org N Total
• CC +
in runorr
3.3 4.0
3.0 3.8
P




 * Calculated as:
 (Nutrient from treated peat  : nutrient  from control plot) x  100

                Nutrient added  in waste


 4.1.3.7.4 Conclusions

 1.  Surface runoff losses of animal waste-derived nutrients  (N and  P)  will
 be  a  problem  if  intense rainstorms  occur soon  (two  to three days)  after
 waste application.

 2.  Incorporation of applied annual waste will  reduce   nutrient   losses   in
 runoff.

 3.  Waste application tends to  reduce soil loss because of mulch  effect.

 4.  Sediment eroded from animal waste-treated areas is  highly enriched with
 nutrients because of manure particles in transported solids.

 5.  Concentrations of soluble N and P compounds in runoff from waste  treat-
 ed areas are high enough to create water quality problems.

 6.  Waste application to untilled  soil gave   larger   nutrient   losses   in
 runoff than waste application on areas  receiving some fall tillage.

 7.  Large nutrient losses in runoff were observed where soils  were  nearly
 saturated before waste application due  to low infiltration and high runoff.

 8.  Sediment and nutrient losses from   waste-treated  and  untreated   over-
 grazed  pasture were low because of the rapid infiltration of applied rain-
water into the pasture soil.

 4.1.3.8 EVALUATION OF FERTILIZER LOSS

     The rainfall simulator was used to evaluate the loss of fertilizer and
 native soil nitrogen and phosphorus from four soil types found in the Black
Creek watershed.  The characteristics of the four soils used are  shown   in
Table  27.   All  plots  of  each  soil  type   were fertilized with 50 Ibs.
phosphorus/ac (54 kg/ha)  of triple superphosphate and 150 Ibs.  nitrogen/ac
 (168  kg/ha)   as ammonium nitrate.  Rainstorms  were applied at an intensity
of 2.50 in/hr (6.35cm/hr).  Two  rainstorms  were  applied  to  the   larger
plots,  one of 60 minute duration and one of 30 minute  duration.  The small
plots had one storm applied of 45 minute duration.
                                                              STUDY RESULTS

-------
104
                                  TABLE 27
             Characteristics of Soils Used in the Investigation


Characteristic*
Slope, %
Clay, %
Silt, %
Sand, %
Total N, ppm
Total P, ppm
Ext. P, ppm
EPC, ppb

Raskins
Loam
0.1-0.3%
12.5
44.5
43.0
1021
363
46
50
Soil

Nappanee
0.7-0.8%
29.5
41.5
28.9
1557
706
44
45
Type
Morley
Clay
4.7-5.2%
33.0
43.5
23.5
1240
366
12
21

Hoytville
Silty Clay
0.3-0.7%
43.8
42.0
14.2
2969
1364
116
115
* Slope is average slope of experimental area; ext. P is amount of
  dilute acid soluble P  (Bray PI) in soil.
     The treatment conditions in this study are very severe and should  re-
veal  the  losses  of nutrients under the worst possible conditions for nu-
trient loss.  High rates of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer were applied
to  the  surface  of  the soil just prior to the initiation of a 2.50 in/hr
(6.35 on/hr) rainstorm.  This type of situation presents the  greatest  po-
tential for nutrient loss in runoff water.

     The runoff losses of phosphorus and solids are shown in Table 28,  and
the  losses  of nitrogen are shown in Table 29.  The losses of soil and nu-
trients were low from these gently sloping soils as  compared  with  losses
reported  for  other rainulator studies.  It has been shown previously that
soil losses of 9.4 and 11 tons/ac (21.38 and 24.74 tons/ha)  resulted  from
two  successive storms applied to a conventionally tilled bedford silt loam
on a 8.3 percent and 12.4 percent slope.  Soil losses from  rainstorms  ap-
plied to the soils in this study ranged from .07 (.15) for the nearly level
Nappanee clay loam to .97 tons (2.18t)  for the Morley clay loam soil having
5  percent slope.  Soil losses were probably low because of the higher clay
content and reduced slope of these soils as compared to the  Bedford  soil.
The  sediment  nitrogen  and  phosphorus losses were lower than or equal to
those found on the Bedford silt loam.  Sediment phosphorus  losses  on  the
Bedford soil were 6.7 to 10 Ibs/ac (7.52 to 11.25 kg/ha) as compared to .39
to 5.3 Ibs/ac (.38 to 5.90 kg/ha) for soils in this study.  Sediment nitro-
gen  losses were also less for the soils representative of the Maumee River
basin 1.4 to 22 Ibs/ac (1.52 to 24.22 kg/ha) as compared to 19 to 26 Ibs/ac
(21.84  to  28.59  kg/ha)  for  the  Bedford silt loam.  Since the sediment
losses from the bedford soil were high, it is  logical  that  sediment  nu-
trient  losses should also be greater.   Plowing down fertilizers on Bedford
silt loam reduced the losses of soluble nitrogen and phosphorus  to  levels
equal  or  lower than the four soils used in this study.  The concentration
of soluble inorganic phosphorus was reduced the most by incorporation; how-
ever, the concentrations of nitrate and ammonium were also reduced markedly
by plowing.  Even though surface application of fertilizer  without  incor-
poration  increases  the  loss of soluble nitrogen and phosphorus, nutrient


STUDY RESULTS

-------
                                                                          105
losses, when expressed as a percentage of fertilizer applied, remain  quite
low.
      H-l
      o
      Q)

      8
      IW
      Vj
      3
      cn
      |

      I
    00 O
    CN a

    |8
      w
      D
      U
      O
      t
      o
      fi
      i-H
      •H
      cS
      w
      0)
      CO
      CO
in
n- E
O »-
O
E u-
oo CL
Q_

•
ft\
\Lf

z. ro
« r-
r— • ^.
O tC M
O
Q.

r— .
— t;
O 4-
/ r\ ^
•- J vj
c
—




tO <4-
-O 14-
— O
•— C
O 3
CO G:
Q
r— *4 _T~;
ra 4- ^
4-1 O :/>
O c c
H- 3 0
c: *->
4-1
C
o
[ 1
re
CJ
1-
c
z o ^
V- — .
O 4-> c:
4-1 ra —
co i- E
a
5 ^
^ 1 Q^
to _c
c E
ro :r
Or


to r-~ oo
-3" rA 1C
j- rA rA
CM rA rH

000
I— 1 rH J-
^t CD rA



I-- LA i-H
r-! CM rH
O rH CD
O 0 0


cn CM r*--
i-H O rH
j rA o
F o o o
re
C
	 i

in
c
— CJ O O
^ CO LA LA
I/) CM O CM
rs CM CM rH
—

LA co r^«
O O "si
rA rA CM



— i 1 1 — *
_ J Ui_ )




C3 O :A
LO IO J"



rH i— 1





CD rA rA
CD CD CM
CO CD rA
CM rH rH

000
cn LO o
J- O CM
	


O CM CO
O i-H O
CD O O
000


O t-l LA
O CM rH
J- 0 rH
000






O C O
o -3- r-»
O CM r-l
rH rH rH


LA CD -3"
-=t rA LO
CM CM CM



1 1 — i 1 1
I-L, __J LX.




LA O O
j- hA rA



^




















E
(3
O
_J

ra
^—
C-3

C
a,
c
fC
c.
a.
-5
•^
























o co LA
CO CM _3-
^ r^ r-»
O 0 0

CD CM OO
CO C CM
rA o i-^
f~> ^-^ f~*j


rA m CM
cr rH cr
CD CD O
O 0 0


rA o LA
rH J- rH
O rH O
O O CD






O L-i O
C-J rH rA
rA -it r^



CO CD CM
LO rH f-^
rH CM rH



— 1 Lt ~~i
— ' •-*- — J




O CD LA
CD CO -3"



i-H rH





CJ CM
I — 1 CD
r-< j-
rH O

CO CD
LA r~-
j- rA
_ i £^


J- r-t
0 rH
0 O
0 O


0 C J
if, r-:
C-J O
0 C






CD O
rH ^1
rA CM



i-H LA
IA cn
rH rH



t 1 " ^
U_ _y




-A 0
j- rA



CM





LA
cn
CD
0

rH
rA
CD
^^


rH
rA
CO
0


rH
LA
0
O






o
r—
r^



i-H
LA
CJ



1 1
1_L.




o
rA









to o
0 CM
01 00
O rH

CM -3-
CM cn
00 LA



O C
rA CM
o o
O 0
5
o
-^ <.O
->LA O
4-1 0 CM
— CO
(/)

a;
r—
1 —
._
> o o
4-1 rH CO
>^ j* r^.
_O
^

TA rA
LA rA
CM CJ




_ J LL>




0 0
CD CC



rH





rH
to
-*
rH

CD
O
•&



0
0
o
o


CM
LA
O
0






O
oo
CM



L3
CD
CM









LA
J-



rH





r^ cxs cn
cn rA oo
LA J- O
rH rH CM

tO CO rH
cn r-- cn
rA rA cn



O rH O
TA rH r-l
0 0 O
O 0 0


1A O CO
to ^- co
rH 0 0
000






000
O OO CO
r~* '^o oo



CM tC. rA
LO LA CO
rH CJ CM









LA O O
-^ rA rA



CJ





CD CD f^
CM J- CM
r^ o cn
CM to rH

r~\ LA r^
rH O rH
r^ cn cn

CNJ L/i r"H

CM O U3
rH CJ 0
O 0 O
000


E -i- LA -if
TC 0 rH 0
O 0 rH 0
0 0 O
>,
rc
r_
(_j

>,
C 0 0 0
i— j- co cn
\- cn rA cn
0 rA-* rH


LA CD -^-
O 03 tA
rA rA CM









CD CD LA
tO LO J"



rH rH





O lii -*
rA rH cn
j- CM rA
CM CM rA

LA OO 1^
LA O rA
CM CM rA
C^l £xj |^*


0 LA rH
O 0 O
O O O
O O O


LA rA tc
r-~ c LA
rH O O
O 0 O






O CD O
cvi cn o
^? rH r>.
rH rA rA


N~> CD CD
O CO CO
CJ CM CN









LA 0 0
J- rA rA



CJ



                                                      STUDY RESULTS

-------
106
                                  TABLE 29
               Losses  of Nitrogen Components  in Surface Runoff
Rainstorm Storm
Number Duration Treatment Amm.-N
Nit.-N
Haskins Loam
1 60
60
1 45
45
2 30
30

1 60
60
1 45
45
2 30
30

1 60
60
1 45
45
2 30
30
U
F
U
F
U
F

U
F
U
F
U
F

U
F
U
F
U
F
0.067
0.510
0.051
0.750
0.091
0.547
Nappanee
0.030
0.863
0.880
0.607
0.023
0.810
Hoytville
0.054
0.863
0.051
0.607
0.023
0.810
0.706
0.547
0.714
0.750
0.091
0.258
Clay Loam
0.198
0.295
0.298
0.864
0.074
0.732
Sol.
Org.N
kg/ha
0.088
0.270
0.000
0.000
0.248
0.193

0.092
0.353
0.000
0.000
0.131
0.000
Sed.N

5.270
5.420
3.650
2.690
3.026
3.200

1.700
4.130
1.520
3.100
1.310
3.670
Sum of
N forms

6.131
6.747
4.415
4.441
3.539
4.206

2.020
5.640
1.906
4.571
1.538
5.212
Silty Clay
1.708
3.027
0.350
4.930
0.340
0.546
0.000
0.048
0.086
0.000
0.033
0.000
3.850
3.780
2.980
3.920
3.950
5.430
5.612
7.718
3.467
3.467
4.346
7.596
Morley Clay Loam
1 60
60
1 45
45
2 30
30
U
F
U
F
U
F
0.107
1.629
0.029
0.628
0.066
1.407
0.367
0.777
0.159
0.463
0.348
0.725
0.024
0.000
0.169
0.015
0.000
0.266
20.090
24.220
10.620
7.910
11.370
13.320
20.588
26.626
20.588
9.016
11.784
15.718
     It is evident from looking at the results that fertilizer  application
does  lead  to  increased  nutrient loss from soils.  The increases are the
greatest in the soluble nitrate, ammonium and  inorganic  phosphorus  frac-
tions.   Sediment phosphorus also appears to increase with fertilizer addi-
tion, probably as a result of sorption of added inorganic phosphorus by the
clay  fraction  in soil.  The loss of sediment nitrogen does not seem to be
markedly affected by fertilization.

     The percent of the various types of nitrogen and phosphorus  found  in
the  runoff  as compared to the total amounts of nitrogen and phosphorus in
runoff is listed in Table 30.  In unfertilized plots, the large majority of
the  nitrogen  found  in  runoff is in the sediment.  On the contrary, with
fertilized plots the proportion of sediment nitrogen in runoff decreased as
the  ammonium-nitrogen and nitrate-nitrogen originating from fertilizer in-
creased.  However, the fraction of sediment  nitrogen  in  fertilized  plot
runoff  was at least 41 percent and, in most cases, greater then 50 percent
of the total nitrogen.  In unfertilized plots, almost all the phosphorus in
runoff is sediment phosphorus.  When plots are fertilized the percentage of
total phosphorus in runoff present as  sediment  phosphorus  decreases  but
STUDY RESULTS

-------
                                                                        107


stays  at  relatively  high levels.  Data from the fertilized plots reveals
that at least 85 percent of the total phosphorus in runoff was in the sedi-
ment phase.

     From the above data, it can be concluded that the most  effective  way
to  control loss of phosphorus and, to a lesser extent nitrogen, is to con-
trol soil erosion.  Substantial decreases in the total nutrient load  would
have  occurred  if soil erosion were decreased.  Most likely the amounts of
soluble nitrogen and phosphorus in runoff would decrease if the  fertilizer
were incorporated in a way that would also minimize erosion.

     The majority of soluble inorganic nitrogen and inorganic phosphorus in
runoff  is  derived from fertilizer  (Table 31).  In most cases the majority
of sediment nitrogen is derived from the soil.  The Nappanee clay loam  was
an  exception  since  the sediment nitrogen derived from fertilizer sources
was quite high.  This finding may be due to the high clay  content  of  the
soil which would increase the probability of large amounts of added ammoni-
um present on the exchange sites of the eroded soil.   Substantial  propor-
tion  of  the sediment phosphorus appears to be derived from the added fer-
tilizer.  This finding is further substantiated by the increased concentra-
tion  of  phosphorus  in  the sediment from fertilized plots as compared to
sediment from unfertilized plots.  The increases in sediment phosphorus and
nitrogen  in runoff resulting from fertilizer are apparently due to the at-
tachment of ammonium to cation exchange sites and sorption of phosphate  to
the clay mineral surfaces shortly after fertilization.  These nutrients are
then carried from the plots as components of the sediment during erosion.

     Total inorganic nitrogen removed in runoff from the two storms  varied
from  0.4 percent to 2.2 percent of  that applied  (Table 32).  losses of ap-
plied inorganic nitrogen from Haskins soils were substantially  lower  than
the  other  three soils.  This finding may have been due to the high infil-
tration rate in Haskins soil because of higher amounts of  sand  and  lower
clay  content than other solids, thus permitting ammonium and nitrate to be
moved deeper into the soil making  it  less  susceptible  to  runoff.   The
amount  of fertilizer nitrogen lost  in all forms varied from 0.8 percent to
5.9 percent of that added  (Table 32).  The losses of  added  nitrogen  from
Haskins soil again were much lower than other soils which seems to  indicate
clay content of the soil may be the  difference since the fertilizer  nitro-
gen lost  in the sediment phase was probably largely  in the form of  ammonium
on the cation exchange sites.

     The percentages of soluble inorganic phosphorus removal by runoff  wa-
ter varied from 0.3 percent to 0.7 percent of that added, and the amount of
added phosphorus  lost  in all forms in runoff varied  from 2.0 percent to 8.0
percent   (Table   32).  The losses of fertilizer phosphorus were larger than
nitrogen  losses as compared to the amounts of fertilizer nitrogen and phos-
phorus  applied.   The  greater losses of applied phosphorus are apparently
from  the  phosphate sorbed  on soil  surfaces  since  the  largest  amount  of
phosphorus in  runoff  is carried by the sediment.  The quantities of fertil-
 izer nutrients  lost  in  runoff  from the four soils do not represent  signifi-
cant  monetary  losses  to  the farmer. The nutrient losses are low consider-
 ing  the severity  of  the experimental conditions.  The  incorporation of  the
fertilizer would  have  likely substantially reduced losses.

     The  average  concentrations of sediment phosphorus and extractable sed-
 iment  phosphorus  in   runoff  increased  as a  result  of fertilization  (Table


                                                              STUDY RESULTS

-------
                                                                                      o
                                                                                      00
                     TABLE 30
Percentage distribution of Nitrogen and Phosphorus
Ra i n storm
Number

1

1

2


1

1

2


1

1

2


1

1

2

Storm
Durat i on
(min. )

GO
GO
45
45
30
3U

GO
GO
45
45
30
30

60
60
45
45
30
30

GO
60
45
45
30
30
Treatment

U
F
U
F
U
F

U
F
U
F
U
F

U
F
U
F
U
F

U
F
U
F
U
F
% of Total M in Runoff as:
MH+4-M
NO-3-N
Raskins Loam
1.1
7.6
1.1
16.9
2.6
13.0
11.5
8.1
16.2
22.5
4.9
6.1
Nappanee Clay Loam
1.5
15.3
4.6
13.2
1.5
15.5
9.8
5.2
15.6
18.9
4.8
14.0
Hoytvi lie S 1 ty Clay
1.0
11.2
1.5
6.4
0.5
10.7
30.4
39.2
10.1
52.1
7.8
7.2
Morley Clay Loam
0.5
6.1
0.3
7.0
0.6
9.0
1.8
2.9
1.4
5.1
3.0
4.6
Sol .
Org.ri

1.4
4.0
0.0
0.0
7.0
4.6

4.5
6.3
0.0
0.0
8.5
0.0

0.0
0.6
2.5
0.0
0.8
0.0

0.1
0.0
1.5
0.2
0.0
1.7
Sed.M

86.0
80.3
82.7
CO. 6
85.5
76.1

84.2
73.2
79.7
67.8
94.9
70.4

68.6
49.0
86.0
41.5
90.9
71.5

97.6
91.0
96.7
87.7
96.5
84.7
% of Total P in Runoff as:
Soil
Inorg.P

0.8
9.1
1.3
13.8
1.9
8.7

3.2
13.5
2.0
14.6
3.0
5.1

6.0
11.3
3.6
10.3
3.6
4.2

0.1
1.9
0.2
7.2
0.1
1.6
Sol .
Org.P

0.7
3.8
0.8
0.0
1.1
0.6

0.8
1.4
0.3
0.2
2.7
1.3

3.3
1.1
0.0
2.2
0.8
0.5

0.4
0.3
0.3
0.0
0.2
0.0
Sed.P

98.5
87.2
98.0
86.2
97.2
90.7

96.0
85.1
97.7
85.2
94.3
93.6

90.7
87.6
96.4
87.4
95.8
95.3

99.4
97.8
99.5
92.8
99.6
98.3

-------
                                                TABLE 31
                                           Percentage Nutrients

Soi 1
Type

Haskins Loam

iJappanee Clay Loam

Hoytvi lie Si 1 ty Loam

Morley Clay Loam


Rn i nstorm
Number

1
2
1
2
1
0
L.
1
2
Form of \\ in Runoff
Sol .
1 norg . fj
% of \\ Der
26.9
67.1
80.3
93.7
5k. 7
73.2
80.3
80.7

Sed.N
ived fn
2.8
5.1*
58.8
P4.3
n.o
27.3
17.1
Ik. 7
Sum of Al 1
N Forms
am Fertilizer
9.1
15.8
6k. 2
70.5
27.3
42.8
22.7
25.0
Form of P in Runoff
Sol .
Inorg. P
% of P Per
93.7
81.7
90.7
76.5
73.8
44.3
9U.5
9U.6

Sed.P
ived frc
17.2
11.7
75.0
59.3
48.5
30.8
54.1
33.8
Sum of All
P Forms
>m Ferti 1 izer
26.7
17.4
61.9
59.6
50.2
31.2
54.8
34.7
                        * Calculated by subtracting  the  nutrient loss from  the  un-
                        treated  plot from  that  of  the  fertilized plot, dividing the
                        difference by the nutrient  loss  from  the  fertilized  plot,
                        and multiplying the  resultant  value by 100.
en
I
                                                                                                             o
                                                                                                             vo

-------
11Q
                                    TABLE 32
             Added Fertilizer Nitrogen and Phosphorus  Lost  in Runoff
Added N lost in

Soil
Type

Rainstorm
Number
runoff
Sol.
Inorg.N
as:
All N
Forms
— % of added N—
Haskins Loam


Nappanee Clay Loam


Hoytville Silty
Clay

Morley Clay Loam


1
2
Total
1
2
Total
1
2
Total
1
2
Total
0.2
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.9
1.5
1.3
0.6
1.9
1.2
1.0
2.2
0.4
0.4
0.8
2.1
2.1
4.2
1.3
1.9
3.2
3.6
2.3
5.9
Added P lost in
runoff as:
Sol. All P
Inorg . P Forms
— % of added P—
0.5 1.6
0.2 0.4
0.7 2.0
0.2 1.1
0.1 1.1
0.3 2.2
0.3 1.6
0.1 1.2
0.4 2.8
0.2 5.9
0.1 2.1
0.3 8.0
   *  Percent of added nutrients lost  in runoff was calculated by subtracting
   the  nutrient loss from untreated plots from that of the fertilized plot,
   dividing the difference by the amount of nutrient added, and multiplying
   the  resultant value by 100.


   33).  Addition of superphosphate decreased the proportion  of  total  phos-
   phorus  in  runoff present as sediment phosphorus from 96.6 percent to 91.8
   percent.  On the average, the total phosphorus content of the sediment  in-
   creased 269 ppm, and the extractable phosphorus content of the sediment in-
   creased 97 ppm as a result of fertilization.  Superphosphate  addition  in-
   creased  the  proportion  of sediment phosphorus which was extractable with
   the  Bray PI solution from 20.6 percent to 25.2 percent  suggesting  that  a
   higher  percentage of added phosphorus associated with the sediment was ex-
   tractable than native phosphorus associated with the sediment.  The finding
   that in excess of 90 percent of the total phosphorus in runoff is sediment
   phosphorus agrees with previous work and suggests that control of soil ero-
   sion can greatly reduce the levels of total phosphorus in surface runoff.

       The concentration of sediment nitrogen in runoff was not markedly  af-
   fected  by  fertilization  although the amount of sediment exchangeable am-
  monium increased as a result of ammonium nitrate addition.  The  proportion
   of   total nitrogen in runoff present as sediment nitrogen decreased from 86
  percent to 71 percent as a result of fertilization.  The fact that sediment
   nitrogen  makes up the bulk of the nitrogen in runoff suggests that control
   of soil erosion can greatly reduce the total amounts of nitrogen in  runoff
   although  the  more  available  soluble  nitrogen components would still be
   present.  Fertilization increased the average Kjeldahl nitrogen content  of
   the  sediment  about 280 ppm and the exchangeable ammonium content about 81
  ppm.  The proportion of Kjeldahl nitrogen in the sediment  present  as  ex-
   changeable ammonium increased from 1.2 percent to 5 percent with fertiliza-
   tion.

       The soluble organic carbon content of runoff averaged  19.6  mg/1  for
  unfertilized  plots  and  28.3  mg/1  for fertilized plots.  The values are
  somewhat higher than the soluble organic carbon  contents  of  streams  and
  STUDY RESULTS

-------
                                                                        Ill
                                  TABLE 33
                          Effect of Fertilization
Effect of Fertilizati<
Composition of Sedimen
to
Soil Treat- Rain Sol.
Type ment* storm P

Haskins





Nappanee





Morley





Hoytville





Average

U


F


U


F


U


F


U


F


U
F
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3



530
454
520
643
685
661
267
422
258
547
707
828
553
513
477
665
697
823
1230
1355
1202
1375
1466
1414
607
876
Dn on
t in
Simi
c
— ppn
76
65
94
213
150
178
113
153
127
199
167
155
25
31
34
196
146
161
231
248
217
368
320
331
118
215
the Phosphorus
Runoff from Fo
ilated Rainstor
Ext. Sed.
5ed.P EPC
i 	 ppb P-
(14.7)
(14.3)
(18.1)
(33.1)
(21.9)
(26.9)
(42.3)
(36.0)
(49.2)
(36.4)
(23.6)
(18.7)
(4.5)
(6.0)
(7.1)
(29.5)
(20.9)
(19.6)
(18.8)
(18.3)
(13.1)
(26.8)
(21.8)
(23.4)
(20.6)
(25.2)
28
35
30
455
180
175
74
44
44
300
136
136
4
10
9
104
54
48
15
86
94
284
138
138
39
179
3, Nitrogen and Carbon
ur Soils and Subjected
ms
Sed . Sed . Sed .
Total N exc.NH4-N Org.C
VWMt O.

1330
1710
1590
1750
1610
1620
790
2570
1040
1840
1830
1590
1860
1650
1590
2070
1890
2030
2350
3190
3160
2870
3570
3490
1903
2180
ft*"
46
47
60
105
116
73
0
0
0
125
89
104
26
28
20
95
100
80
0
0
0
118
114
103
19
102

(3.5)
(2.7)
(3.8)
(6.0)
(7.2)
(4.5)
(0.0)
(0.0)
(0.0)
(6.8)
(4.9)
(6.5)
(1.4)
(1.7)
(1.3)
(4.6)
(4.8)
(3.9)
(0.0)
(0.0)
(0.0)
(4.1)
(3.2)
(2.9)
(1.2)
(5.0)
t
0.
1.
1.
1.
1.
2.
3.
3.
3.
2.
5.
2.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
2.
2.
5.
3.
5.
3.
2.
2.
2.

53
13
00
18
00
64
48
89
76
50
11
64
45
18
04
68
38
35
13
11
78
81
81
90
37
62
* U-unfertilized; F-fertilized

Values in parenthesis are extractable P as a % of sediment total P and
changeable ammonium as a % of sediment total N.
ex-
rivers, which are usually about 10 mg/1.  The average sediment organic car-
bon  concentration in runoff was about 200 mg/1, thus the organic carbon to
Kjeldahl nitrogen ratio (C/N) for  surface  runoff  was  approximately  11.
Soils normally have a C/N ratio of 9 to 12, so it can be seen that sediment
carbon and sediment nitrogen are being eroded in roughly the  same  propor-
                                                              STUDY RESULTS

-------
 112
 tion that they occur in the soil.

     There was a strong relationship between the solids content  of  runoff
 and  the  sediment phosphorus concentration in the runoff.  A similar rela-
 tionship was observed between solids and the sediment nitrogen  content  of
 runoff.   These  findings suggest that the solids content of surface runoff
 provides a good indication of the relative amounts of sediment nitrogen and
 phosphorus  present  in  runoff.   It  may  be  possible  to obtain a semi-
 quantitative estimate of the sediment nitrogen and  phosphorus  content  of
 runoff  based upon solids content in a given watershed if most soils in the
 watershed are similar.

     The solids content was also significantly correlated with the  soluble
 organic  phosphorus  concentration, the soluble organic carbon content, and
 the exchangeable ammonium concentration in the sediment.  Thus, it  appears
 that  the solids content of surface runoff from these soils is a key factor
 in determining the concentrations of certain forms of nitrogen, phosphorus,
 and carbon in runoff.  However, solids content may not always be related to
 sediment nitrogen and phosphorus content since  soil  type,  slope  of  the
 soil,  natural  fertility  and other soil associated factors can affect the
 composition of the sediments inducing variability.  Therefore, the nitrogen
 and  phosphorus concentration in sediment may change as related to the ori-
 ginal soil because of selective enrichment by smaller size fractions, espe-
 cially  clay.   When  prediction  of nutrient content of sediments is made,
 these factors need to be considered.

     Clay content of the runoff was  related  to  solids,  soluble  organic
 phosphorus,  sediment  total phosphorus and organic carbon in the sediment.
 It appears that the clay fraction carried a  large  portion  of  these  nu-
 trients  contained  in  the  runoff.  Clay particles especially the related
 amorphous material, have a high affinity for  phosphate  ions  and  organic
molecules.

     A very high correlation coefficient (r=0.91) was obtained for the  re-
 lationship between the soluble inorganic phosphorus concentration in runoff
 and the equilibrium phosphorus concentration (EPC) of runoff sediment.   It
 appears  that  the  concentration of soluble inorganic phosphorus in runoff
may be accurately estimated by determining the EPC of the sediment.  It  is
 interesting  to  note that the relationship between soluble inorganic phos-
phorus and sediment EPC was observed even when results from  several  soils
were  combined  and when the solids content of runoff varied from 0.17 per-
cent 2.74.  These findings suggest that the relationship between the  sedi-
ment  EPC  and  the  soluble inorganic phosphorus concentration in water is
similar for different soil types.

     The original soil EPC, when compared to soluble  inorganic  phosphorus
concentration of the runoff from unfertilized plots, resulted in a correla-
 tion coefficient of 0.81, which indicates under certain conditions the ori-
ginal soil EPC may be useful in predicting the soluble inorganic phosphorus
 in runoff.  The nature of the equilibrium between  the  soil  and  solution
makes  it  possible for the soil to buffer solution phosphorus.  Soil, when
 associated with solutions of low phosphorus status, may  desorb  phosphorus
whereas  under conditions of high concentrations of solution phosphorus the
 soil may sorb phosphorus.  If the composition of the runoff is known, pred-
 ictions  can  be  made to assess the contribution of sediment phosphorus in
STUDY RESULTS

-------
                                                                        113
runoff to the phosphorus status of lakes and streams.

     Sediment phosphorus in runoff was  related  to  the  concentration  of
soluble  phosphorus  in  runoff and to the concentration of soluble organic
carbon and sediment organic carbon in runoff.  As expected  the  concentra-
tion  of extractable phosphorus in the sediment was directly related to the
concentration of total phosphorus in the sediment.   The  concentration  of
extractable  phosphorus in sediment was also related to sediment EPC.  This
finding suggests that the EPC technique and the Bray  P-l  extraction  pro-
cedure  measure  a similar fraction of soil phosphorus which determines the
concentration of orthophosphate iji equilibrium solutions.  It has been  ob-
served  that  EPC  measures the buffering capacity of a soil for phosphate,
whereas Bray P-l extraction measures the phosphate potential of the soil.

     The soluble ammonium nitrogen concentration in runoff was  related  to
the  exchangeable  ammonium nitrogen concentration in runoff and to the ex-
changeable ammonium nitrogen content of the sediment.   This  finding  sug-
gests that an equilibrium exists between the soluble ammonium in runoff and
the exchangeable ammonium present on solids in runoff.   Thus,  it  may  be
possible  to  predict one of these forms of ammonium in runoff if the other
form is known.  Soluble organic nitrogen in runoff is related to  the  con-
centration  of  sediment nitrogen in runoff and to the concentration of ex-
changeable ammonium in the sediment.  It appears likely that a  given  pro-
portion  of  organic  nitrogen  in these soils is solubilized during runoff
events and therefore soils containing high organic nitrogen  contents  have
runoff higher in soluble organic nitrogen than soils containing low concen-
trations of organic matter.

     The four soils used in the study were separated into their sand, silt,
and clay fractions for chemical analysis.  The fractionation procedure gave
fractions which represented 94.3 percent of the weight of the original sam-
ple.   A  higher  recovery could have been achieved if the large volumes of
suspended clay could have been air-dried in a short period  of  time.   The
freezing process made recovery much faster since a major portion of the su-
pernatant could be decanted.

     The results of the chemical analysis of the soil constituents and  the
original  soils are presented in Table 34.  The analyses of samples for to-
tal phosphorus, total nitrogen, and  extractable  phosphorus  all  indicate
that  the highest concentrations of nitrogen and phosphorus in soil are as-
sociated with the clay fraction.

     Phosphorus adsorption on clays has been related  to  the  presence  of
amorphous  oxides and hydrous oxides or iron and aluminum.  The presence of
iron oxide and hydrous oxide coatings on clay mineral surfaces has been re-
ported.   Such  coatings,  along with greater surface area, may explain the
fact that a large proportion of the total phosphorus in the soil is associ-
ated with the clay fractions.  Since silt and clay are, in many cases, pre-
ferentially eroded, higher losses of sediment nitrogen and phosphorus would
be expected than if the soil were eroded in mass.  This observation has led
to the use of enrichment ratios where the concentration of sand, silt,  and
clay  in  the particulate phase of surface runoff is compared to concentra-
tions in the soil.  Previous researchers have observed  increases  in  clay
content  of  eroded materials.  For a soil containing 16 percent to 18 per-
cent clay, clay percentage in the eroded material increased from 25 percent
to  60 percent as runoff diminished from 2.7 inches to .01 inches (70 mm to
                                                              STUDY RESULTS

-------
  114
                                  TABLE  34
                       Analysis of  Soil  Size  Fraction

Soil Type

Fraction
Percent
of Soil
Total
N
P
	 u
Haskins
Loam


Morley
Clay Loam


Hoytville
Silty Clay


Nappanee
Clay Loam


whole soil
sand
silt
clay
whole soil
sand
silt
clay
whole soil
sand
silt
clay
whole soil
sand
silt
clay
100.0
43.0
44.5
12.4
100.0
23.5
43.4
33.0
100.0
14.2
42.1
43.7
100.0
28.9
41.6
29.5
1021
166
710
4406
1240
225
835
2165
2969
424
1794
4466
1557
182
972
3231
364
168
240
1135
366
90
127
739
1241
704
756
1364
706
399
335
1109
Ex tractable
P*
/g 	
46
29
36
155
12.4
10.5
10.5
16.1
117
49
102
166
44
21
34
75

EPC**
— ng/ml —

5
3
28

0
0
0

0
7
44

1
2
9
  *  Bray P,  (Jackson,  1970).

 **  EPC  - equilibrium  phosphorus concentration  (Taylor and Kunishi,  1971).


 0.25 mm) of runoff per hour.  Runoff from storms of  lesser   intensity  may
 carry   as much sediment phosphorus as  intense  storms due to greater enrich-
 ment during low runoff.

     If selective erosion occurs, the  potential for  enriching  water  with
 nutrients  is  increased because the concentration of nutrients in the clay
 fraction is much higher than the whole soil.   It is apparent  that selective
 erosion occurred in these soils because the nitrogen and phosphorus concen-
 tration of the sediment from unfertilized plots are higher  than  those  of
 the  whole soil and in some cases higher than  the concentration in the clay
 fraction of the soil.  This finding suggests that the fine  clay  particles
 are being eroded preferentially and could be a potential source of nitrogen
 and phosphorus to the solution due to  the higher nutrient concentration  of
 the fine clay.

     Phosphorus adsorption isotherm relations were determined for the three
 factions of each soil.  The isotherms  indicate clay has the greatest abili-
 ty to buffer the soluble phosphorus concentration.  The  clays,  when  sub-
 jected   to  concentrations  of soluble orthophosphate greater than the EPC,
will sorb phosphorus from solution.  Clay in stream and  lake  systems  can
 serve   as a phosphate sink during periods of high phosphorus concentration.
Even though clay may holding the largest fraction of phosphorus in  streams
and  lakes  it  also has the ability to maintain the concentration of phos-
phorus  in solution at levels lower than in runoff which enters  the  water.
The  concentration  maintained is most likely dependent upon the EPC of the


STUDY RESULTS

-------
                                                                        115
eroded material and the EPC of the material present on the stream bank  and
lake bottoms.

4.1.3.9 CONCLUSIONS

     Fertilizers increase the soluble nitrate-nitrogen,  ammonium  nitrogen
and  orthophosphate-phosphorus  content  of runoff.  These losses are small
(none greater than 8 percent) as compared to the amount of  fertilizer  nu-
trient added to the soil.  The soluble inorganic nitrogen and phosphorus in
runoff are readily available for algal growth; and therefore, reduction  of
the concentration of nutrients in runoff is desirable.

     Sediments contain the majority of nitrogen and phosphorus  in  runoff.
Sediment  nitrogen  and phosphorus are not immediately available to aquatic
plants but these forms  may  serve  as  potential  nutrient  sources.   The
greatest  portion  of  nitrogen and phosphorus associated with sediment ap-
pears to be in the clay fraction.  Soils susceptible to  selective  erosion
may yield sediment which contain more nitrogen and phosphorus than the ori-
ginal soil since clay and silt percentages of sediment  generally  increase
relative  to  the  soil during erosion.  The best approach for reducing nu-
trient loss from cropland appears to be erosion and runoff control.

     Practices such as fertilizer incorporation are important as  indicated
by  this  study  and previous investigations.  Conservation tillage methods
need to be evaluated with respect to control of erosion and runoff and sui-
tability to present day farming practices.

     The findings of this study allow one to make certain inferences  about
the  composition  of runoff from soils of the Upper Maumee River watershed.
It appears that the solids and clay content of the runoff are the most  im-
portant  parameters  in  controlling the concentrations of several forms of
nitrogen and phosphorus in runoff.  The data suggests that control of  soil
erosion  and  proper incorporation of fertilizers  (to prevent mass movement
of fertilizer in runoff water) can greatly reduce the concentrations of nu-
trients in runoff from the soils studied.

     The concentration of soluble inorganic phosphorus in runoff  (possibly
the  most important single parameter in eutrophication) can be estimated by
measurement of the EPC or the extractable phosphorus content of eroded  ma-
terial.   The  EPC  value of unfertilized soil or soils in which phosphorus
fertilizers have been incorporated can be  used  to  estimate  the  soluble
inorganic  phosphorus  concentration in runoff.  These relationships should
be very useful in development of models for prediction of nutrient loss  in
the Maumee River watershed.

     The concentration of soluble ammonium in runoff can be estimated  from
the  exchangeable ammonium content of the runoff sediment.  It also appears
likely that the exchangeable ammonium content of the soil is related to the
soluble  ammonium concentration in runoff.  The concentration of nitrate in
the runoff was not related to any runoff properties  which  were  measured.
This  is to be expected in that nitrate is water soluble and is not associ-
ated with the solid phase of the soil.  This finding suggests that develop-
ment  o  a model for loss of nitrate in runoff water will be very difficult
because nitrate losses are dependent upon a large number of hydrologic  and
soil factors.
                                                              STUDY RESULTS

-------
  116
                                 References

First Annual Report, Black Creek Project, Allen County Soil and Water  Con-
servation District.

Schroeder,Steve, Soil Aggregates Transported  in Runoff  From  Cropland  and
Their Relationship to Total Soil Loss, Purdue University, May 1976.

Kaminsky, Jr., D. B., Nitrogen and Phosphorus in Surface Runoff from  Agri-
cultural Soils, Purdue University, May 1975.


4.2 BANK STABILITY STUDIES

     Two study areas were selected to determine the  effect  of  slope  and
mulching  materials  on the revegetation of the stream banks and of the ef-
fects of the mulching materials in controlling erosion during the revegeta-
tion.   Site  1  on the upper end of the Dreisbach Drain  (on the Joe Graber
farm) was installed in September-October, 1973.  Site 2 on the Wertz  Drain
between  Notestine  Road  and  Black Creek  (on the Dick Yerks farm) was in-
stalled in April, 1974.  Three slopes,  2:1, 3:1, and 4:1 were used at each
site.   Mulch  materials of stone, straw, and wood chips along with a check
or no-mulch were used on both locations.  In addition, aquatain and sawdust
were used on the Joe Graber farm.

     The final evaluation on May 2, 1975, showed that all mulches were  ef-
fective  in  controlling  erosion and in helping to establish cover.  There
was no consistent difference in the mulch material effectiveness  with  the
exception  of  the  stone mulch.  Stone appeared to be slightly superior in
controlling erosion resulting from high water, and resulted in as  good  or
better  grass  cover  than  other mulch materials.  In May of 1974 both the
wood chip and straw mulch materials were washed away during high water flow
in  the  Wertz Drain.  While there is not a totally consistent advantage of
one mulch material over the other, all mulches improve the establishment of
the grass and help control erosion during the establishment period.

     The 3:1 slopes appeared to be slightly better than either the  2:1  or
the  4:1 slopes.  This can vary with local conditions.  For example, on the
Graber farm the 3:1 slopes are far superior to the others but this is  com-
plicated  by  the fact that there was more good soil on the 3:1 slopes than
on any of the other two slopes.  In fact, a year and a half after  the  es-
tablishment  and  planting  of  grass, the 2:1 and 4:1 slopes on the Graber
farm still showed evidences of low fertility.  Grass cover  helped  control
erosion in all cases.

     Bank stability studies were a part  of  original  plan  of  work.   To
determine  if  a  correlation  might exist between bank cover, particularly
trees vs. grass, and bank stability.  The reported data of the SCS study in
Black  Creek has been reviewed.  While this data shows a strong correlation
between soil type and bank erosion it is not possible to relate erosion and
cover in the published data.

     Three sites were initially selected for studies to  determine  if  the
channels  were  agrading  or  degrading.  Two  of the sites have since been
reconstructed and revegetated.  Observation of the third site (Wertz  Drain
south of the woods and north of Antwerp Road)  indicates that the channel is


STUDY RESULTS

-------
                                                                         117


relatively stable with little or no accumulation or loss.

     High water flow during May of 1974 deposited one to two inches of silt
and  sand  on the mulch study plots on the Wertz Drain.  Other evidences of
such  deposition  during  high  flows  has  been  observed  throughout  the
watershed.   There  is  also  evidence  of continued cutting of some of the
channels where velocities of flow are high.  This seems  to  be  especially
true  where velocities are high during normal to low flow such as occurs on
the mulch study area on the Dreisbach Drain.  Observations of channel scour
are in agreement with stability studies which showed that many of the lower
bank and channel bottoms were unstable for existing flow and  slope  condi-
tions throughout many areas of the Maumee Basin.

     Soil mechanics studies have identified several locations where channel
bottoms  are  potentially unstable.  The most likely reason for instability
is excess channel slope and a less resistant soil material in  the  profile
near  the  channel bottom.  It is evident that if a channel bottom degrades
even stable banks eventually must become unstable.

     Four sites were selected for study of channel bottom stability.   One,
on the Joe Graber farm, was known to have lowered 30 to 60 cm (1 to 2 feet)
following revegetation of the banks.  In this area, small rock drop  struc-
tures were installed in 1975.

     The Black Creek channel at Notestine Road was surveyed for a  distance
of  30  m (150 ft.) upstream and 65 m (200 ft.) downstream from the bridge.
This is an area where rock was used for channel training.  It  is  also  an
area  where soil mechanics studies indicated a potentially unstable channel
at flood flow.  This channel was shown to be unstable because of  the  soil
material  in the channel bottom and also the slope, 0.25 percent.  This 115
m (350 ft.)  degraded approximately 42 cm (1.4 ft.) between May of 1974  and
August  of  1976.   The channel has considerable grass and other water type
vegetation in the bottom.

     Another site on the Gorrell drain along Notestine Road for a  distance
of 165 m (500 ft.) downstream from the monitoring site shows the ditch bot-
tom to be almost identical with the original.  This section has an  average
slope of 0.2 m per 100 m (0.20 percent).  This is the smallest slope of any
of the four sites studied.

     Wertz drain between Notestine Road and the main channel of  the  Black
Creek, a distance of approximately 305 m (1000 ft.), was a site of the bank
slope-mulch studies.  This channel reach has an average slope of  0.4  per-
cent  (0.4  meters  per  100).  Earlier observations had indicated that the
channel bottom was eroding in several sites.  The survey conducted  in  Au-
gust  of  1976 showed that with the exception of a section about 200 meters
below the Notestine Road all of the channel had eroded.  For the first  160
m  (500  ft.)   an  average lowering of approximately 30 cm (1 ft.) occurred
between March of 1974 and August of 1976. The  last  70  meters   (200  ft.)
above  the  main  Black Creek channel eroded approximately 45 cm  (1.5 ft.).
There are several areas in this section where erosion of the channel bottom
has caused the top of the banks to slip into the channel.

     These survey results plus other observations indicate that there are a
number  of sections throughout the Black Creek watershed where channel bot-
tom erosion is producing unstable bank conditions.
                                                              STUDY RESULTS

-------
118


Survey of Streambank Erosion

     As a part  of  the  International  Joint  Commission  PLUARG  studies,
streambank  erosion  is  being surveyed under the direction of a Mr.   W.  F.
Mildner of the Soil Conservation Service.  These studies are generally made
on  a statistical sampling basis, but because of the intensity of the Black
Creek Study and the size of the basin, a complete survey was made  in  this
particular watershed.

     The study was conducted in the summer of 1975 and the data has recent-
ly  been  made  available to the author by Mr. Mildner.  The survey covered
29.3 miles on stream for a total bank miles of 58.6.  The  following  meas-
urements  are listed in bank miles.  The drainage density was determined  to
be 1.56 miles of channel per square mile.  It was determined that there are
7.2  eroding  bank  miles  producing approximately 400 tons of sediment per
year.  It was estimated that only 6.3 miles of  simple  treatment  and  0.9
miles  of armoring would solve this problem.  At the present time there are
18.4 miles of simple treatment and 1.7 miles of armoring in the watershed.

     There does not appear to be any correlation of the bank  erosion  with
use  of  the adjacent land or with whether or not the banks are fenced.  It
is interesting to note that over 80 percent of the total tons of streambank
erosion  are  produced  by two soil types, Eel 59.4 percent and Shoals 25.1
percent.  Yet the same soils account for only 18.7 and 7.3 percent  respec-
tively of the total miles of streambanks.

     While this survey shows a relatively small amount of sediment produced
by  streambank  erosion, nevertheless at the site of occurrence the erosion
may be quite severe.  Often the eroding sections can be controlled  with  a
comparatively  small  amount of simple treatment.  The need to control bank
erosion emphasizes a need for a good maintenance program  in  any  plan  to
reduce sedimentation.

4.3 SEDIMENT BASINS

     The sediment pond, a small sediment basin, was constructed on the Vir-
gil  Hirsch  farm in the fall of 1973. It filled to overflowing in November
of that year.  It serves a drainage area of 185 ha  (460 acres).   The  soil
types  are Hoytville'and Nappanee.  The land slopes are generally less than
one-half per cent.  Sediment depositions were determined by fathometer  and
by  probing.   Sediment  was  examined  for determination of particle size.
Sediment samples for laboratory analysis were collected.

     Sediment deposits were found to be uniform  is  depth  throughout  the
pond  area  with an average accumulation of 6 cm (0.2 ft.).  Particle sizes
were uniform, being primarily in the clay and silt fractions, with a  small
amount of fine sand.

     Laboratory analysis of the samples confirmed that the  sediment  is  a
silty clay texture.  The range of the sample analysis were as follows:

         Silt    52.1 — 63.9%
         Clay    31.9 — 42.0%
         Sand     4.2 —  5.9%

     The sediment pond accumulated 1880 cu m  (2400  cu  yd.)  of  sediment.


STUDY RESULTS

-------
                                                                          119
 Assuming   a dry weight  of  857  kg  per  cu meter  (55 pounds per  cubic foot)
 this  amounts to  an  average of 2.8 ton per  ha per  year (1.2 tons  of sediment
 per acre  per year).  However,  this figure cannot be projected as  a long term
 average because  of  two  factors:

      1)   The area immediately to  the north of the pond  site was  in a  tran-
      sition stage   and was  very subject  to erosion until the conservation
      practices on it were  completed  in 1975.   Thus,  this  area may have con-
      tributed  above a  normal amount of  sediment  in this  three year period.
      There has also  been some construction activity on  the west  end of  the
      pond site.

      2)   In May  of  1975, a nearly 100-year frequency storm  was  received.
      This  storm produced  the highest runoff volume and sediment concentra-
      tions yet measured at many of the stations.   It produced between  1/3
      and  1/2 of  the  1975 annual sediment transport at some of the measuring
      stations.

      The  Desilting Basin on the main stream  of the  Black  Creek  was  con-
 structed   in  September of 1974 and  was  first surveyed on July 30,  1975.  A
 second survey was conducted July  7,  1976.  Sediment samples were  collected
 from  this basin  for  particle  size determination.

      The  first survey covering a  period  of approximately  nine months showed
 an  accumulation of 770   cubic  meters  (980  cubic yards)  of material.  The
 second survey showed an additional accumulation of 416 cu meters (530 cubic
 yards)  in approximately   a   one year  additional   time.   Sediment sample
 analysis  is shown in Table 35.  This table shows  only the per cent sand by
 size  fraction   and  does not  include the finer  silt  and clay fractions.  It
 is only at stations  460 and 461 where less than one-half   of the  sediment
 accumulated was  in the  sand size  fraction.
                                  TABLE 35
   Percent Sand and Sizes in Desilting Basin Deposits at Stations Listed







Size Range in mm
Station
457+000
458+000
459+000
460+000
461+000
>2
26.58
7.94
.85
.38
0
2tol
11.68
5.15
1.09
.46
0
lto.5
17.36
11.52
2.41
.19
.13
.5to.25
27.46
46.07
14.88
1.28
.88
.25to.l
6.67
16.43
33.01
17.02
13.59
.lto.05
1.48
2.44
13.93
21.24
21.08
Total
%*
Sand
91.23
89.55
66.17
40.57
35.68
  Percent sand is based on total dry oven weight of sample.
     This would indicate that much of the material being  trapped  by  this
desilting  basin  is bed-load.  To date, no evidence has been seen of addi-
tional scour of the channel immediately below  the  desilting  basin.   The
first 50 meters (150 ft.) of this basin is nearly full.  If it continues to
trap material at the present rate, it will have to be cleaned out to remain
effective.
                                                              STUDY RESULTS

-------
120
4.4 MICROBIOLOGICAL STUDIES

     Microbiological studies were conducted on grab  samples  collected  at
stations throughout the watershed.

     To discover the variability associated with grab sampling and analysis
of the water samples, triplicate samples were collected from station 312 on
April 31, 1977.  Agreement between the samples was  good  (see  Table  36).
However,  the estimated standard deviations are, in many cases, as large as
the differences between stations  (except where septic tank effluent greatly
elevated  the  counts).  Due to this level of variability and an incomplete
data record at many stations, it was decided not to examine the  data  from
individual stations.  Instead, the general patterns of bacterial contamina-
tion in the Black Creek watershed were defined by grouping similar stations
together.   The  results,  during  conditions  of low stream discharge, are
presented in Section  4.4.1.
                                  TABLE 36
       Bacterial Counts From Surface Water Station 312, May 31, 1977
Total col i form

Mean
Standard
Deviation
2,700
1,600
1,700
2,000
608
Fecal col i form
400
700
100
400
300
Fecal streptococcus
100
100
200
133
64
4.4.1 Bacterial Counts at Low Flow

     On five of the six sampling dates, the stream discharge in Black Creek
was  considered to be low (see Table 37).  This distinction was not made on
the basis of an arbitrary numerical discharge rate but rather on the  pres-
ence  or  absence  of surface runoff from agricultural land.  At low stream
discharge there was no surface runoff, while at high stream discharge there
was substantial surface runoff.

     A total of 65 observations from 20 surface water stations  are  avail-
able to estimate the bacterial counts expected in the Black Creek watershed
given normal conditions of low stream discharge.  Table 38 summarizes  this
information.   The  mean values are unrealistically high because of unusual
environmental conditions, such as nearby septic tank outfalls, that created
a  few  extremely high values.  The median values of 3,500 total coliforms,
1,000 fecal coliforms and 200 fecal streptococcus per 100 ml of water serve
as  our  best  estimates  of  bacterial  contamination  in  the Black Creek
watershed as a whole during low stream discharge.  However,  these  figures
do not accurately describe the fecal pollution that existed at many locales
in the Black Creek watershed as some stations were far  more  polluted  and
others  had  coliform  concentrations  which  approached the most stringent
clean water guidelines.
STUDY RESULTS

-------
                                                                         121
                                  TABLE 37
           Stream Discharge Class By Date for Two Sampling Sites
Date

3-19-76
6- 7-76
8-23-76
11-29-76
3-28-77
5-31-77
Average Daily Discharge m"3/sec
Site 2
.048
.008
.004
.000
1.007
.001
Site 6
.025
.004
.000
.002
.775
.001
Discharge
class
low
low
low
low
high
low
                                  TABLE 38
   Total Coliform, Fecal Coliform and Streptococcus Count - Low Discharge
      Total coliform   Fecal coliform   Fecal streptococcus
      	Count/100 ml  wate-i?	
Range  100-2,600,000    0-2,600,000           0-890,000
Median     3,500            1,000                200
Mean     164,668          109,114             19,114
4.4.2 Contamination at Low Flow

     Because reliable estimates of bacterial contamination at specific sam-
pling  stations  could  not  be  made,  the  stations were grouped into six
categories based on levels of discharge and organic  pollution.   When  not
carrying storm runoff, some streams in the Black Creek watershed maintained
a base discharge from groundwater.  Others ceased to have any discharge and
in  the summer months became a series of isolated pools.  A few sections of
stream had an intermittent flow arising from domestic waste effluent.  Fig-
ure 15 outlines the location of these three flow regimes in the Black Creek
watershed.  The major source of sewage was the town of Harlan, but  indivi-
dual septic tank outfalls occurred throughout the watershed.

     The grouping of stations was done by assessing the locality  in  rela-
tion  to both the proximity of sewage outfalls and the stream discharge re-
gime.  Table 39 shows these groupings  along  with  mean  bacterial  counts
plus/minus the standard deviation for each group.  The large standard devi-
ations reflect the highly variable nature of the data caused in part by the
wide  range  of  environmental  conditions  encountered  during  low stream
discharge.  There were no significant differences between the  group  means
due  to  the  high  variances.  However, the mean bacterial counts did show
trends consistent with a subjective assessment of organic pollution in each
of the groups.

     In Figure 16, the data for each group is presented to  show  the  fre-
quency  of six levels of bacterial contamination.  Groups B and F, stations
with high levels of organic pollution, had  broad  distributions  of  total
                                                              STUDY RESULTS

-------
   122
         Base Flow
         "Harlen" Flow
         "No Flow"
                          Figure 15.  Flow Regimes in Watershed
STUDY  RESULTS

-------
                                  TABLE 39
 Surface Water Stations According to Stream Discharge and Organic Pollution
                                                                              123
Group
Number
of
stations Discharge Organic Mean +- stand deviation
in group Regime Pollution (Count per 100 ml water)
Total Fecal Fecal
coliform coliform
A

B

C

D

E

F

2

2

4

4

6

2

Isolated
pool
Intermittent
flow
Intermittent
flow
Base
flow
Isolated
pool
Isolated
pool
Moderate

High

Moderate

Low

Low

High

5
+-2
554
+-473
16
+-5
7
+-14
2
+-2
537
+-9 30
,333
,754
,900
,800
,010
,903
,243
,398
,316
,640
,600
,260
3
+-4
671
+-954
3
+-7
4
+-13

+-1
29
+-47
,666
,038
,450
,069
,850
,424
,079
,508
895
,030
,656
,500
streptococcus
200
+-346
116,190
+-278,800
480
+-539
300
+-568
216
+-432
7,422
+-19,000
coliform counts and median values of 435,000 and 59,000 respectively.   The
moderately polluted groups, A and C, also had wide distributions but median
total coliform counts were 4,000 and 3,450 respectively.  The remaining two
groups,  D  and  E, had low levels of pollution, a narrower distribution of
total coliform counts and median values of 2,850  and  1,750  respectively.
The  distribution  of  fecal  coliform counts was very similar to that just
described for total coliforms.  The median values were as  follow:   highly
polluted  groups,  165,000  (3)  and 7,200 (F); moderately polluted groups,
1,800  (A) and 950  (C); slightly polluted groups, 500  (D) and 400  (E).   Fe-
cal  streptococcus  contamination  was slight except in the highly polluted
areas where median counts were 5050  (Group B) and  1,600  (Group  F).   The
remaining groups of stations had median counts less than 200 fecal strepto-
cocci per 100 ml water.

     It is evident that, at low stream discharge, the degree of fecal  con-
tamination was dependent upon the proximity to sewage outfalls and the type
of flow in the stream.  The fecal coliform counts indicate that sections of
the  Black  Creek  drainage receiving septic waste have fecal contamination
far in excess of any public health standards.  Other areas of the  drainage
removed  from  nearby septic tank pollution were found to occasionally meet
federal public health standards for fecal coliform contamination  but  gen-
erally these areas had twice the allowable limit of 200 fecal coliforms per
100 ml of water.

     On 28 March, 1977, there was considerable surface runoff from agricul-
tural  land,  and  stream  discharge  in  Black  Creek was high (.775 cubic
meters/sec).  Table 40 summarizes the data  collected  during  this  runoff
event.   The mean and median values were not greatly different because sep-
tic tank effluent in the badly polluted stream sections was being  diluted.
The  median  values  for  total coliform, fecal coliform and fecal strepto-
coccus counts were 5, 3, and 17 times greater, respectively, than the medi-
an values during low stream discharge (see Table 38).

     The increase in total and fecal coliform counts was caused  by  higher
counts  at  stations  on  Black  Creek downstream of Harlan,  The tributary
drains not influenced by Harlan showed only a slight increase  in  coliform
                                                              STUDY RESULTS

-------
124
5
5
5
1O
5
1O
5
5
l
l
11
P
i
l
l
l
i




n



0

1
i

m
, —


n

•


i
i

i
i —
i
n i




	 i





L
A
• • • •
n \MI sn
| • | |
c
1 HI n
D
^ M 1 1 ^

I
n^ra n
E
ii n^ m
lifll In
1 00 1 00 - 1 ,000 1 ,000 - 1 0,000 1 0,000 - 50,000 50,000 - 500,000 500,000 - greater
	 	 ,., RflPtprifll rnnnt 	
                Cl Total Colifor
Fecal Col iform
                         Fecal Streptococcus
 Figure 16. Frequencies of  Levels of Contamination
 STUDY RESULTS

-------
                                  TABLE 40
                  Coliform Counts  at High Stream Discharge
                                                                 125
           Total      Fecal       Fecal
         coliform   Coliform   Streptococcus
         	count/100 ml water	

Range   600-92,000  0-36,000     0-10,000
Median      18,000     3,350        3,500
Mean        25,960     4,865        4,220
contamination over low stream discharge levels (see Table 41).
                                  TABLE 41
                  Coliform Counts at High Stream Discharge


Stations down-
stream of Harlan
Stations not
influenced by
Harlan
Total
low
discharge

2,850

1,800
coliform
• count per ]
high
discharge

32,000

2,500
Fecal
On ml Tiia-HoK-
low
discharge

600

500
coliform
high
discharge

5,300

700
     These observations led us to two conclusions:

     1) Storm runoff from agricultural land in the  Black  Creek  watershed
was  not  substantially  different  from low stream discharge runoff in the
levels of total and fecal coliform contamination, and,

     2) Highly organic, contaminated material deposited at septic tank out-
falls was scoured and flushed downstream during the storm event.

     The increase in fecal streptococcus contamination during high flow was
observed at all stations on the Dreisbach Drain.  A grassed waterway and an
open ditch in this section of  the  watershed  carried  between  5  and  10
thousand fecal streptococci per 100 ml of water.  A slightly lower level of
contamination (3,000-9,000) was maintained along the lower Dreisbach drain,
the Richelderfer Drain and Black Creek.  The remaining tributary drains had
from 0 to 3,500 fecal streptococci per 100 ml of  water.   Thus  the  Upper
Dreisbach  Drain  agricultural  area  and the town of Harlan were the major
identifiable areas of fecal  streptococcus  contamination  at  high  stream
discharge.   The  dominant  type  of  livestock  handling  in the Dreisbach
subwatershed is open grazing in pastures and confinement in small barnlots.
In  these  areas  the  contamination was over an order of magnitude greater
than the levels of pollution observed at low stream discharge. -  The  other
monitoring stations in the Black Creek watershed showed the storm runoff to
be only slightly more contaminated than low stream discharge runoff.  It is
concluded  that  some livestock operations were responsible for substantial
fecal pollution of storm runoff in the Black Creek watershed.
                                                              STUDY RESULTS

-------
 L26
4.4.3 Bacterial Counts,Maumee,Warm Ditch

     Surface water samples were collected from the  Maumee  River  and  the
Warm  Ditch  to  facilitate  a  comparison of the coliform contamination in
Black Creek with the coliform contamination in its receiving body of  water
(Maumee  River)  and a similar creek adjacent to the Black Creek watershed.
The Warm Ditch lacks any concentrated urban area and is comparable  to  the
tributary  drains of Black Creek not influenced by the town of Harlan  (sam-
pling Group E).  As expected, the counts were  similar  to  those  reported
from  stations  in  Group  E.  The trend for increasing fecal streptococcus
counts at high stream discharge was also observed on the Warm Ditch.

     Counts observed in the Maumee River were quite wide-ranging,  probably
being  a  function of discharge, as the highest counts were recorded in the
spring.  Fecal coliforms were generally fairly low (200-500 counts per  100
ml),  but  at  high  discharge,  the counts increased an order of magnitude
(400-15,000).  Fecal streptococci were detected only  once  at  the  Maumee
River  station  during  a  period of high stream discharge (March 28,1977).
Compared to the waters of the Black Creek drainage, the  Maumee  River  had
approximately  the  same concentration of total coliforms but lower concen-
trations of fecal coliforms and fecal streptococcus (excluding  periods  of
high stream flow).

4.4.4 Bacterial Counts in Tile Drainage Water

     Twenty tile drainage systems were chosen for sampling on the basis  of
the  soil types being drained.  The data record is too incomplete to deter-
mine if soil type was a factor affecting the level of fecal pollution  from
tile  systems.   Of  120 attempted sample collections, 55 could not be made
because the tile systems were not flowing.  In addition, six  of  the  tile
lines were found to be connected to septic tank systems.  As a result, con-
clusions about fecal pollution from tile systems  are  rather  limited  and
have been based on the following observations.

     The tile drainage stations are broken down into the septically pollut-
ed  tiles  and  the  non-septically  polluted tiles in Table 42.  A further
division is made between  the  low  flow  and  high  flow  sampling  dates.
Predictably,  the  septically-polluted  tiles  had very high average values
during low flow when there was very little dilution of septic waste by  na-
tural  drainage  water.   At  high flows these same tiles carried far lower
concentrations of all three bacteria because of the dilution by sub-surface
drainage  water.   The  non-septically polluted tile systems had fairly low
levels of coliform contamination  that  remained  unaffected  by  discharge
rates.   The  total  coliform  counts  were  very  similar  at high and low
discharge and a small increase in fecal  coliform  concentrations  at  high
flow  resulted  from  two  tile  stations  with surface water inlets having
higher values.

     The increase in fecal streptococcus  contamination  of  non-septically
polluted  tile  systems  at high flow was a general occurrence recorded for
the majority of the tiles sampled.  At low flow, only 1 of 14 stations  had
a fecal streptococcus count above 100, while at high flow 12 of 14 stations
had counts over 100.  However, the magnitude of increase was not  generally
as  great as the average figures in Table 42 indicate.  At high flow, 10 of
the 14 stations had fecal streptococcus counts between 100 and  500,  while
two  tiles  with  surface  water  inlets  had  counts an order of magnitude


STUDY RESULTS

-------
                                                                        127
                                  TABLE 42
 Coliform Counts for 6 Septically Polluted and 14 Non-septically Polluted Outlets


Low
Flow
mean
Septically Polluted


Non-septically Polluted


TC
FC
FS
TC
FC
FS
329,
60,
29,
2,


500
683
662
327
60
12
High
n
21
21
21
24
25
25

TC
FC
FS
TC
FC
FS

9
2
5
2

2
mean
,740
,340
,880
,286
430
,150
Flow
n
5
5
5
14
14
14
 greater.  Non-septically polluted  tile  drainage  systems  were   an  identifi-
 able   source  of  fecal pollution at high  stream  discharge,  although the  de-
 gree  of contamination was  not great.

 4.4.5 Fecal Coliform/Fecal Strep Ratios

      An indication of the  source of fecal pollution  is given by  the  fecal
 coliform/fecal  streptococcus  ratio  (FC/FS).  A ratio greater  than 4  indi-
 cates human sources of pollution,  a ratio less than  1 indicates  an animal
 source and a ratio between 1 and  4 indicates combined human and animal  fe-
 cal pollution.  In the Black Creek watershed, at  low  flow,   the  dominant
 source of  fecal  contamination   was   the human septic  waste  effluent,  but
 there was a significant  (p<.01) shift from human to  mixed human and animal
 sources of pollution when discharge increased (see  Table 43).   This obser-
 vation further supports  the conclusion  that  livestock operations had a sub-
 stantial impact on the fecal contamination of storm  water runoff.   Stations
 in the upper Dreisbach agricultural area exhibited the greatest  degree  of
 fecal   contamination  from livestock,  while stations in other  areas showed
 either  livestock sources or mixed  human and  animal sources.
                                  TABLE 43
        The Number of FC/FS Observed and Expected FC/FS Determinants

Human sources
Mixed sources
Livestock sources


FC/FS > 4
FC/FS 1-4
FC/FS < 1
x2=24.44,
Low flow
45(36.7)
14(15.3)
6(13)
p<.01
High flow
3(11.3)
6(4.7)
11(4)

4.4.6 Biochemical Oxygen Demand
                                                              STUDY RESULTS

-------
128
4.4.6.1  BOD

     Samples were collected for biochemical oxygen  demand   (BOD)  analyses
during  a  major storm event on June 30, 1977  (7.1 cm rainfall).  Grab sam-
ples were collected in a 2 liter polyethylene containers  and  refrigerated
until  laboratory set-up was initiated the next day.  The grab sample loca-
tions are noted in Table 44.  In addition, composite samples were made from
the water collected by automated pump samplers at sites 2 and 6.  At stream
stages above one foot, the automated pump samplers collected a water sample
every  30  minutes during the course of the storm event.  Composite samples
for BOD analysis were made at the end of the event by combining  50  ml  of
water  from each sample taken by the pump sampler.  Laboratory analysis for
BOD was done by Pollution Control System, Inc.  (Laotto, Indiana) following
the  procedures  of  Standard  Methods (American Public Health Association,
1971).                         	
                                  TABLE 44
                  BOD During Ascending Flow of Storm Event
Station
Grab samples
296
297
127
128
165
310
Composite samples
2

6
BOD (mg/1)

12.0
6.6
14.0
16.0
16.0
480.0

6.3

9.3
Predominant Feature of Watershed

Small watershed, Amish farming
Small watershed- conventional farming
Dreisbach Drain, urban buildup
Richelderfer Drain, urban buildup
Wertz Drain, Amish farming
Tile Drain, confined feeding operation

Smith-Fry Drain, conventional farming
no urban buildup
Dreisbach Drain, Amish farming, urban buildup
4.4.6.2 RESULTS

     All grab samples were taken during the ascending climb  of  the  storm
hydrograph.   Results  are  listed in Table 44.  Two samples were collected
from adjacent small watersheds (60 acres)  in  the  rolling  uplands.   The
watershed  with  Amish farming practices had twice the BOD concentration in
runoff water as the area under a conventional farming  operation.   It  ap-
pears  the  unconfined  livestock in the Amish area substantially increased
the amount of organic matter in surface runoff.

     Grab sample 310 was taken from a large tile outlet known to have  sur-
face  inlets  in  the vicinity of a large confined livestock feeding opera-
tion.  Although this operation is equipped with  properly  designed  animal
waste  holding facilities, surface runoff from the barnyard area does reach
the tile drain and eventually Black Creek.  The  BOD  at  station  310  was
exceedingly  high,  480  mg/1, equivalent in strength to raw sewage  (Hynes,
1960).  The tile outlet was sampled during the initial phase of  the  storm
and surface runoff was just beginning so the volume of discharge was small.
It is doubtful that BOD concentrations remained this high during peak storm
STUDY RESULTS

-------
                                                                        129
runoff  because  dilution would be greater.  In terms of total BOD loading,
such a confined feeding operation  cannot  be  considered  a  major  source
within  the watershed, but it is the type of source that raises BOD concen-
trations in stream above the concentrations found in runoff from  cropland.
Also, highly concentrated organic matter delivered to stream in this manner
could be damaging to the localized section of stream at the tile outlet  if
rainfall and runoff are not sufficient to dilute and flush away the organic
matter.

     The composite samples collected from the Smith-Fry drain  (site 2)  and
the  Dreisbach  drain  (site 6) also illustrate the effect of urban build-up
and Amish farming practices on BOD concentrations.  The Smith-Fry watershed
lacks  any  urban  influence  and  is  farmed predominantly by conventional
methods while the Dreisbach watershed contains the town  of  Harlan  and  a
large number of Amish farmers.  Composite BOD concentrations for site 2 and
6 were 6.3 and 9.3 mg/1 respectively.  Precise BOD  loading  data  has  not
been calculated yet, but to arrive at a first approximation, composite con-
centrations were multiplied by the average  daily  discharge  computed  for
June  30,  1977.  Estimated loadings of BOD for the storm event were 320 kg
and 220 kg at sites 2 and 6 respectively.  More rainfall and runoff in  the
Smith-Fry  watershed accounted for the greater loadings at site 2.  Averag-
ing data for both watersheds the rate of BOD export from  the  Black  Creek
watershed for this storm was approximately one-third kilogram per hectare.

     Grab samples were taken on three major drains of Black Creek prior  to
peak  flows  on June 30.  BOD concentrations were similar in all three sam-
ples ranging from 14 to 16 mg/1.  Two of the samples were taken  downstream
from  the  town  of Harlan and the other from a predominantly Amish farming
area.  The urban area with its septic effluent and the Amish  area  with  a
large  number of unconfined livestock appear to be the factors that created
high BOD concentrations in stream flows  (14-16  mg/1)  compared  to  runoff
from conventional cropland  (6.6 mg/1).

4.4.7 Fish Kill Caused by Organic Pollution

     On 28 September 1977 several thousand gallons of  manure  slurry  were
accidentally  discharged  into  Black  Creek  when  an animal waste holding
lagoon was emptied directly onto adjoining cropland.  The slurry entered  a
subsurface tile network through broken tile lines and/or surface inlets and
was delivered to the stream with very little dilution  (Table 45).  The  im-
pact at the outfall was devastating and low stream flows were  inadequate to
dilute the pollutant to non-toxic levels.  The material moved downstream as
a slug which could be visually detected.  Three downstream samples had very
high BOD  (130-300 mg/1) even prior to the arrival of the main  slug of  pol-
lutant.  Ammonia N concentrations were also greatly elevated  (Table 45).

     Fish mortality was severe in the entire 9 kilometers of   stream  below
the  spill.   Mortality  probably resulted from low oxygen levels and/or an
ammonia toxicity.  Accidental or intentional discharge  of  organic  pollu-
tants  from animal waste holding facilities can create gross organic pollu-
tion in streams when discharge is low and potential damage is  the greatest.
Wide  spread  organic pollution from other sources  (septic tanks and uncon-
fined livestock) is greatest at high stream discharge when dilution reduces
the impact on aquatic  life.
                                                               STUDY RESULTS

-------
 130
                                  TABLE 45
             BOD and Ammonium N Concentrations During Fish Kill
Sample
Location
Upstream
Source (tile line)
Downstream 100 m
Downstream 580 m
Downstream 1720 m
Downstream 2440 m
BOD
mg/1
2.1
28,000
7,200
130
220
300
Ammonia N
mg/1
1.2
2,400
600
11
18
20
 4.4.8  Pesticides  and  Heavy Metals

     Several  spot checks were made  for  the presence  of  pesticide   residue
 and  for heavy metals  in sediment, in fish and  in water samples according  to
 the  procedures outlined in Section  0.0.2.  Results  of   this  analysis  are
 presented   in Table  46 and are summarized  in Table 47.  Sampling was done
 under  low-flow conditions  and may not reflect  the  situation  during storm
 events.  Overall, a low level of contamination was found.
                                  TABLE 46
                  Pesticide and Heavy Metal Concentrations
Location Dieldrin
Sediment Samples
401 ND
402 ND
403 ND
404 ND
405 ND
406 ND
407 ND
408 ND
409 ND
410 ND
411 ND
412 ND
413 ND
414 ND
DDE
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
PCB's
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
2-4-5-T Cd
0.77
0.66
0.64
0.94
1.08
ND 1.51
2.18
ND
.34
.34
.37
ND 1.15
1.97
ND 2.65
Hg
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
.003
ND
.005
Zn
2.69
2.24
2.28
1.85
1.55
1.66
2.90
2.46
ND
1.55
1.40
1.56
4.46
4.47
Fish Samples
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
0.012
0.013
0.027
0.031
0.031
0.047
0.022
0.013
0.012
0.017
0.021
0.027
0.031
0.021
0.014
0.007
0.117
0.070
0.265
0.140
0.182
0.142
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.18
0.16
ND ND
ND
ND
0.092
0.042
0.008
0.009
0.036
0.021
0.051
0.077
14.4
20.2
21.8
19.1
19.2
12.2
16.6
18.2
STUDY RESULTS

-------
                                                                       131
                     Table 46  (continued)
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432

Water
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440

0
0
0
0
.086
.010
.011
.004
0.009
0
0
0
0
0

.014
.021
.015
.017
.009

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

.014
.015
.010
.009
.023
.008
.012
.012
.018
.010

0.
0.
0.



0.
0.
0.
0.

086
108
111
ND
ND
ND
173
211
121
113

_
-
-
ND
-
-
-
-
-
ND

ND
ND
ND
ND
0.15
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND


0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

ND
.023
.041
.050
.047
.030
.076
.102
.174
.078

13.3
24.2
17.5
23.4 i
23.9
16.4
15.7
22.6 :
17.3
22.3

Samples









ND
ND
ND
-
ND
ND
ND
ND










ND
ND
ND
-
ND
ND
ND
ND

0.

0.






0004
ND
0002
-
ND
ND
ND
ND
__._ 	
-
-
0.003
-
ND
-
-
0.001

0.113
0.099
0.052
-
0.037
0.029
0.026
0.038

0
0
0

0




.0002
.0002
.0002
-
.0002
ND
ND
ND

0.029
0.022
0.021
-
0.020
0.017
0.010 1
0.014
j
Note:  Concentrations expressed in ppm
       fish  /g  wet weight
       water  /g ml
       ND = not  detected
        - = not  determined

                                 TABLE 47
      Summary of Pesticide and Heavy Metals Detected  and Not Detected
Substances Not Substances
Medium
Water





Sedi-
ment






Fish





Detected
Atrazine
Alachlor
Carbofuran
Malathion
Dieldrin
DDE
Atrazine
Alachlor
Carbofuran
Malathion
Dieldrin
DDE
PCB's
2, 4, 5,-T
Atrazine
Alachlor
Carbofuran
Malathion
2, 4, 5,^T

Detected
2, 4, 5,-T
PCB's
Cadmium
Mercury
Zinc

Cadmium
Mercury
Zinc





Dieldrin
DDE
PCB's
Cadmium
Mercury
Zinc
Number
Samples
2
7
7
7.
•-»
/

14
14
14





18
18
18
18
18
18
Number Max.
Min.
Mean
Occur ences 	 Concentrations 	
2
2
7
4
7

12
2
13





18
18
13
3
17
18
0.003
0.0004
0.113
0.0002
0.029

2.65
0.005
4.47





0.086 0
0.031 0
0.265 0
0.18 0
0.174 0
24.2 12
0.001
0.0002
0.026
0.0002
0.010

0.34
0.003
1.55





.004
.007
.070
.15
.008
.2
0.002
0.0003
0.056
0.0002
0.019

1.19
0.004
2.39





0.022
0.016
0.140
0.16
0.053
18.8
                                                  STUDY RESULTS

-------
132
      Trace levels of 2, 4, 5,-T in water was found to persist  after  ditch
 bank  maintenance  with  herbicide sprays.  Higher concentrations may exist
 immediately after the maintenance procedure.

      Low levels of organochlorines were detected in fish, but not in  sedi-
 ment.   This  suggests  that  there  is currently no significant loading of
 these insecticides.  Fish maintain a small amount of pesticide residue, but
 this is well below acceptable levels for human consumption as determined by
 the Food and Drug Administration.  Effects on the fish life cycle are  con-
 sidered  minimal.  The level of PCB's detected in fish tissue were low, and
 are not an immediate cause for concern to humans or to fish life.  However,
 PCB's were also found in water which presents evidence of continued loading
 to the aquatic system.

      Heavy metals were found in low concentrations and are considered to be
 not  much  different  than background levels.  The concentrations are not a
 concern to human health.

 4.5 FISH STUDIES

 4.5.1 Fish Sampling

      Sample stations  (see Section „ 3.3,1      were chosen to include rif-
 fles  and  pools and were paced off to 100 m lengths.  In the Wertz Woods a
 set of three pools with combined length of approximately 30 m was  sampled.
 Minnow  seines   (1.2 x 4.5 m) with 6 mm mesh were used in most sampling.  A
 seine was placed at the lower end of a sample area and at least  two  seine
 sweeps  were made downstream through the area.  For more complex areas such
 as Wertz Woods stations were broken into smaller segments and seined  until
 capture  rates declined to near zero.  Typically this required three to six
 seine hauls in the most complex streams sampled.

      Fish samples were preserved in 20% formalin solution until a  synoptic
 collection was developed.  Thereafter, most were released immediately after
 field tabulation.  Identification  of  fishes  followed  classification  of
 Trautman  (1957) and Nelson and Gerking  (1968).

 4.5.2 Habitat Structure

      Stream habitat structure was measured in June and September 1975,  and
 March  1976  for  three dimensions:  depth, bottom type, and current.  Four
 depths, nine bottom substrates, and five current categories were recognized
 (Table 48).  Stream depth categories were chosen as representative of habi-
 tats found in the small streams sampled: 0-5  cm  corresponded  to  shallow
 edges and riffles, 5-20 cm to riffles and shallow pools, 20-50 cm to pools,
 and greater than 50 cm to deep pools.  Bottom types were  categorized  into
 physical  and  biotic structures.  Among the physical forms, categories 1-5
 corresponded to alluvial material of increasing size  from  silt  to  rocks
 with  category  6 as clay parent material  (clay pan).  Biotic categories  (7
 and 8) included vegetation   (aquatic  plants  and  filamentous  algae)  and
 litter   (leaves,  twigs  and  branches).   A miscellaneous category, 9, was
 reserved  for unusual  items such as bedrock  slabs  or  large  tree  trunks.
 Currents  were correlated with specific water velocities and were gauged by
 observing the movement of water about a measuring pole.

      Point samples were taken in a regular fashingin each study area.   Be-
 ginning   10-20  cm  from  the left bank, points were taken at 1 m intervals
 across the stream.  For very narrow stream  (maximum 1 m wide) such as Limbo
 Creek  and  Wertz  Woods at low flow, 0.33 m intervals were used.  Repeated
 STUDY RESULTS

-------
           TABLE  48
Categories for Habitat Analysis
D imens ion


Depth


Range (cm)

Descr i pt i on
1
0-5

very
Category "lumber and Description
2
5-20

shal low
3
20-50

node rate
it 5 6789
>50

deep
s h a 1 1 ow


Current


Bottoms

Flow Velocity
(m/sec )

Descr i pt ion
Diameter (mm)

Descr i pt ion

<.05

very s
<.05

silt

.05-. 2

low slow
.05-2

sand

.2-.lt

moderate
2-10

gravel

.it-1.0 >1.0

fast torrent



pebble rock clay-pan vegetation litter misc.

-------
134


sets of points were taken  across  the  stream  at   5  m   intervals  moving
upstream.   Sample  data showed that a minimum of 90 to 160 points were  re-
quired at  structurally complex sites  (Wertz Woods and Indian Creek) and   60
to 80 points  for simple areas  (Black Creek) for adequate measurement of  ha-
bitat diversity.  Habitat sampling was generally conducted on  the same   day
as  fish sampling with the exception of September 1975 when Black Creek  ha-
bitat samples were taken one week  after   fish  sampling.   No changes   in
weather conditions occurred during this interval.

     Habitat  diversity was calculated using  the  Shannon-Weiner  equation.
Diversities   were  calculated  for each habitat dimension alone and then in
combinations  of depths and bottoms (36 categories),  currents  and  bottoms
(40   categories),   and   finally   depths,  bottoms,  and  currents   (180
categories).  Only certain combinations  of  these   dimensions existed   in
these streams.  For instance, we found no  rock-bottom torrents greater than
50 cm deep, or silt-bottom riffles.

     Combinations of habitat dimensions were tried to determine  which   di-
mension  or   combinations were better predictors of  fish species diversity.
The effect of combining  dimensions  increased  the  number  of  categories
geometrically and thereby increased the habitat diversity index additively
since this index is an exponent.

     Mean  habitat indexes were calculated  for each dimension   by  averaging
the  number   of values for each category.  This allowed each stream site to
be characterized as shallow, sandy, slow,  etc.  In the  bottom-type  dimen-
sion  only the alluvial categories (1-5) represent continuous  variation,  so
calculation of mean habitat indexes was restricted to those categories.

4.5.3 Species Composition and Distributions

     A total  of 35 species of fish representing 24 genera and  11  families
have  been collected  in the Black Creek  watershed  basin  (Table 49).  This
represents about 21 percent of the species and 41 percent of   the  families
known  from   the  State of Indiana (Nelson and Gerking 1968).  A recent  IJC
report (1975) on the fishes of the Maumee  River lists 91 species  from   the
Maumee  Basin in a survey by the Ohio Department of  Conservation and Traut-
man (1957).   Therefore about 35 percent of the fishes known from the  basin
have  been collected  in Black Creek.  It is significant that most species
found in Black Creek show either stable population trends  (32  species)   or
are  decreasing  in  the  Maumee  Basin  (3  species).  The three declining
species are Northern Pike, Redear Sunfish, and Creek Chubsucker.  The sunf-
ish in Black  Creek escaped from a farm pond and the  Pike were  captured only
in the spring of 1974.  The Chubsucker was common in Wertz Woods but it  has
disappeared following siltation after bank stabilization in upstream areas.
About a dozen species collected in Black Creek  seem to  be   declining   in
abundance  although  they are not experiencing declining populations in  the
Maumee Basin  according to the IJC report.  Other species known from  Black
Creek  are  the  most  tolerant  forms to  be expected in first, second,  and
third order streams  in  an  agricultural  watershed.   The  minnow  family
(Cyprinidae)  is represented by the largest number of species  (12) with  the
sunfish family (Centrarchidae)  being  represented  by  the  second  largest
number of  species (8).  The minnows make up the largest number of individu-
als in the basin but in terms of biomass the sucker  family  (Catastomidae)
is  the  dominant group, especially during the late  spring and early summer
migration period.
STUDY RESULTS

-------
                                                                         135
                                  TABLE 49
                   Fish Species Collected  in Black Creek
Scientific  (Common) Name    Status  in  the Black Creek  Basin
                                    Distribution
                                    20 18 20 Wertz Wd
Aplodinotus grunniens
  (Freshwater Drum)

Umbra limi
  (Central Mudminnow

Semotilus atromaculatus
  (Creek Chub)
Pimephales promelas
  (Fathead Minnow)

P. notatus
  (Bluntnose Minnow)
Ericymba buccata
  (Silverjaw Minnow)

Campostoma anomalum
  (Stoneroller)

Notropis cornutus
  (Common Shiner)

N. stramineus
  (Sand Shiner)
N. spilopterus
  (Spotfin Shiner)
N. umbratilis
  (Redfin Shiner)

Phenacobius mirabilis
  (Suckermouth Minnow)

Notemigonus chrysoleucos
  (Golden Shiner)

Cyprinus carpio
  (Carp)
Very rare  fall migrant
 (One specimen)

One specimen
Distributed throughout the area;   C  V V V
some movements, especially influx
in spring.

Most abundant  in upstream areas.   V  V V V
Common throughout the basin but    C  V V V
most abundant  in small streams
below P. promelas areas.

Common throughout the basin        V  V V V
especially in  silty to sandy area.

Uncommon but distributed              U U C
throughout.

Abundant to common throughout;     R  U C V
some migration in spring.

Generally restricted to areas in      C V
the main channel of Black Creek;
move upstream  to some extent in
late spring and early summer;
often found in same areas as
E. buccata.

Common below station 12; uncommon  C  C V R
in rest of basin except in fall
when large numbers invade.

Rare throughout the basin, except  C  U C R
in early summer.

Rare in Black  Creek below station     R R
15.

Uncommon below station 12; resident      R C
population in Wertz Woods.

Common and often large in main        R U
Black Creek channel-
                                                    STUDY RESULTS

-------
136
 Erimyzon oblongus
   (Creek Chubsucker)

 Catastomus commersoni
   (White Sucker)
 Carpiodes cyprinus
   (Quillback Carpsucker)
 Moxostoma sp.
   (Redhorse)

 Fundulus notatus
   (Black-striped Topminnow)
 Percina maculata
   (Black-sided Darter)

 Etheostoma nigrum
   (Johnny Darter)

 E. spectabile
   (Orangethroat Darter)

 Lepomis cyannellus
   (Bluegill)

 L. macrochirus
   (Green Sunfish)

 L. microlophus
   (Redear Sunfish)

 L. humilis
   (Orange-spotted Sunfish)

 L. gibbosus
   (Pumpkinseed)

 Pomoxis nigromaculatus
   (Black Crappie

 P. annularis
   (White Crappie)

 Micropterus salmoides
   (Largemouth Bass)

 Labidesthes sicculus
   (Brook Silverside)

 Ictalurus natalis
   (Yellow Bullhead)
Uncommon in basin except common  in          C
Wertz Woods.

Abundant in spring migration  (esp. R  R  U  V
large individuals); permanent
residents throughout Wertz Woods.

Common in Black Creek near Maumee        U
River; sporadic in rest of area,
most abundant in late summer and
fall.

One specimen
Common to abundant, esp. in areas     C  C  R
with dense growth of aquatic plants
and in late summer and early fall.

One specimen.                            R
Common, esp. in rocky areas.          R  U
Uncommon                              u  R
Common throughout                  R  R  C  U
Common throughout                  V  U  V  V
Collected occasionally             C  U  C  R
Rare
Rare                               R
Rare
Rare summer iramatures                    R
Young sporadic in several areas    R  R  R  R
Also widely distributed in 1977.

One individual caught in Black
Creek near Maumee River.

Small individuals sporadic           U  U  R
throughout basin; some large
residents in Wertz Woods
 STUDY RESULTS

-------
I. melas                    and below station 12.                R
  (Black Bullhead)                                                      137

Esox lucius                 Several large individuals seen or
  (Northern Pike)            captured in spring 1974.

Dorosoma cepidianum         Common near Maumee River; many          R  U
                            migrate upstream in late summer
                            and fall.

Distribution at first (Station 20), second (18) , and third (12) order
stations of the watershed plus Wertz Woods using the following abundance
classes:

     V — Very Common — > 85% of samples
     C — Common      — 50 to 80% of samples
     U — Uncommon    — 20 to 50% of sampels
     R — Rare        — < 20% of samples
     Predictably, the similar physiognomies  and  geographic  proximity  of
Black  Creek and Wann Creek resulted in nearly identical fish faunas.  How-
ever, the fauna at the sample station on Wann Creek was exceptionally rich;
17  species  were common  (caught more than 50 percent of the samples) while
at Black Creek's station 18 (of similar size  and  stream  order),  only  7
species  were  common.  Overall, one station in the Wann Creek drainage had
more common species than any area on Black Creek and more species were cap-
tured  per  sampling period.  The first order stream in the Wertz Woods was
also surprisingly rich in comparison the rest of Black  Creek;  11  species
were  common  in  Wertz  Woods  while  at  station 20 in Black Creek only 8
species were common.   Only  station  12  had  more  common  species  (12).
Overall, the number of species captured per sample in Wertz Woods was simi-
lar to.station 12 but more consistent.  The Wertz Woods yielded the highest
fish  species  diversity for the Black Creek drainage.  Typically each sta-
tion on Black Creek was dominated by a few species, resulting in  low  fish
species  diversity,  while Wertz Woods and Wann Creek had consistently more
species and more equitable abundance distributions even though Wertz  Woods
was first order and Station 12 was a third-order stream.

4.5.4 Seasonal Changes in Fish Communities

     The average number of fishes per station  peaks  in  the  Black  Creek
watershed  in  early  spring but the magnitude of peaks varies from year to
year depending on the activities of man and rainfall amounts (Karr and Gor-
man  1975).  Spring peaks (March-April) are associated with spawning migra-
tions of fishes from downstream areas, including the Maumee River.   Summer
declines  in Black Creek are associated with disappearance of larger fishes
due to low water levels.  An increased capture rate in late summer and fall
results  from increased catchability of young of the year and some fall mi-
grations.  Late winter sampling show that densities decline as a result  of
some  downstream migration and natural mortality during the winter.  Larger
fishes were relatively uncommon in upstream areas except during the  spring
migration  period  of March and April.  Communities in headwaters were dom-
inated by small minnow species such as Pimephales spp.,  Ericymba  buccata,
and  juveniles  of  Semotilus atromaculatus.  Fishes at downstream stations
tended to be larger and less numerous.  Overall, upstream areas had  higher
densities  of  smaller fishes such that headwater and downstream areas sup-
port similar biomasses per meter of stream.
                                                              STUDY RESULTS

-------
138
 4.5.5 Habitat,Fish Community Diversity

      There is a significant relationship between habitat diversity and  fish
 species  diversity  when  Black  Creek data are combined with data from two
 other stream systems (Gorman and  Karr  1978).    Significantly the   relative
 importance  of the three dimensions  — bottom,  current,  and  depth  — varies
 among stream systems.   Neither  bottom  nor depth diversities  are good pred-
 ictors  of fish species diversity of Black Creek because of  the uniform na-
 ture of the habitat components  due to  ditching   activities.   Algal  blooms
 characteristic  of dry periods  with  low flow conditions  are  also correlated
 with exceptional low fish diversities.   These blooms  are associated  with
 stream  reaches  lacking  shading vegetation.   Further,  water temperatures
 tend to be very high in such areas:  28 degrees  C as compared to 19  degrees
 C   in  the  same  stream  where  it  is shaded in a woodlot  (Karr and Gorman
 1975).

 4.5.6 Effects of Channel Modification

      The effects of channel  and  bank   modifications  can most  easily be
 demonstrated  by examining changes in  the fish  communities at station 15 on
 Black Creek.

      The first 50-m sample from station 15 was  made on 12 April  1974  when
 210  fish were captured.   Fifty-nine  of  these  fish had average total  lengths
 of over 150 mm indicating the high  biomass   in  that  section  of  stream.
 Larger   individuals were creek   chubs,   white suckers,  common shiner,  and
 green sunfish.   Mean weight  per individual was  25.85 gms  and biomass densi-
 ty   was 108.6 g per meter of stream.  After bottom dipping and bank  modifi-
 cations in late spring  1974  fish densities declined and have remained  low.
 Table 50 summarizes the  fish community  data for  April.


                                  TABLE 50
                     Fish Community Density During April


April 1974
April 1975
April 1976
Number of
fish per meter
4.2
.34
.05
Mean Weight (g)
per individual
25.85
2.10
<0.5
Biomass (g)
per meter
108.6
1.0
—
     Fish densities in 1977 were also quite low at station 15 although they
were high in nearby upstream areas with little or no channel modification.

     At the time of the April 1974 samples the stream showed the effects of
earlier  channel  modification  but  erosion and deposition areas with some
segregation of particle sizes was evident.  The mean depth  of  the  stream
was  near  50  on  while following channel modification in 1974 water depth
averaged only about 10 on.  The decline in fish populations at this station
seems  primarily  attributable  to channel modifications reducing depth and
bottom diversity.  Similar patterns of change in fish  densities  have  oc-
STUDY RESULTS

-------
                                                                         139
curred at other Black Creek sample areas.

     These changes  in streams modified by man's  activities  are   in   sharp
contrast  to  the more damped oscillations of fish abundances  in Wann  Creek
and  in several pools associated with the Wertz Woods along the Wertz Drain.
In   Wertz  Woods  as a number of species characteristic of downstream  areas
persisted throughout the year.  Fish marked with a cold-branding   technique
were commonly recaptured in Wertz Woods while fish marked in other areas  in
the  Black Creek watershed were rarely recaptured.  It is not clear from our
data whether fish outside Wertz Woods disappeared due to high mortality  or
leaving the watershed; both factors are probably very important.

     Even relatively protected sections of stream like that in Wertz  Wood
may  be  subjected  to  high  mortality.   The very dry period in late 1976
resulted in almost total  mortality  throughout  upstream  areas  in  Black
Creek.  Because of deep pools fish in Wertz Woods persisted later than fish
in other areas.  However, most were killed before the onset of winter  and
the  few  remaining  individuals  were killed by the severe cold weather  of
early 1977.

     Upstream migrations in 1977 were similar to those in earlier years and
resulted  in recolonization of the whole watershed.  However,  fish have not
been able to reestablish resident populations in Wertz  Woods.   As  demon-
strated  in  1975 (Karr and Gorman 1975) the meandering pool and riffle to-
pography of Wertz Drain in Wertz Wood resulted in deposition   of  about   28
percent of sediment carried by Wertz Drain.  Although we do not have direct
evidence, indirect evidence suggests that declining sediment loads are  due
to   physical  processes (Unit Stream Power of hydrology)  rather than action
of biotic systems (Karr and Schlosser 1977).

     Construction on the Wertz Branch upstream from Wertz Woods was instru-
mental in halting the recolonization of Wertz Woods in 1977.   The construc-
tion activity itself and subsequent erosion of unstable bank and channel  in
Wertz  Branch  yielded large amounts of sediment.  Grab sampling of several
runoff events revealed that sediment concentrations from the  Wertz  Branch
were  4-8  times  greater than from undisturbed channels.  As  this sediment
moved downstream it was deposited in  downstream  areas  (especially  Wertz
Woods).   This  deposition  has  reduced the diversity of depth, bottom and
current characteristics in Wertz Woods  and  prevented  reestablishment  of
resident  fish populations.  Monitoring is continuing to determine how long
this problem will persist.

     It should be clear from these results and the more detailed  presenta-
tions of Karr and Schlosser (1977)  and Gorman and Karr (1978)   that attempts
to improve water resources must involve broad based, multi-purpose program.
Management plans which produce clean water in the absence of suitable habi-
tat diversity will not improve the biota of waterways.  Low quality  stream
biotas  may result from low water quality, poor habitat diversity, seasonal
low flows and other  factors.  All of these problems must be  addressed  be-
fore  incremental  improvement  can  be  expected  in a wide range of water
resource characteristics.
                                                              STUDY RESULTS

-------
140
 4.5.7 Stream Disturbance and Fish Communities.

     Stream environments are naturally  unstable;   i_.e.,  due  to  seasonal
 variation  in rainfall, flow volumes do not remain constant  in most streams.
 However, flow volumes are  relatively predictable in most  natural  streams.
 Environmental   extremes, such as high water and droughts, occur predictably
 from season to  season and  year  to year.  Fishes have  evolved  physiologies
 and  behaviors   to minimize mortality during  these  extremes,  ( e_.g_.  migra-
 tion to more suitable habitat,  moving into pools during dry periods, etc.).

     Structurally diverse  natural streams typically have a  great  deal  of
 buffering   capacity: meanders tend to moderate the  effects  of floods, pools
 offer excellent refuges for fishes during dry spells, and   tree  shade  de-
 creases  heat loads and minimizes the oxygen-robbing effects of decomposing
 and extensive algal blooms.

     The reliability of stream  environments is reduced by   man's  modifica-
 tions  of   these systems to suit his needs.   Ditching increases stream gra-
 dients by  meander  removal and channel  shortening.   Also,  bottoms  are
 dredged to create a uniform, pool-less, unstable substrate.  These attempts
 to  increase drainage efficiency result in little buffering  from floods  and
 droughts and increases their severity.

     Other stream modification  procedures which enhances instability is the
 removal of shade-producing vegetation, and the sloping of banks.  This max-
 imizes solar heating of the water and increases problems from algal blooms.
 Also,  massive   deforestation   of  drainage   basins enhances the impact of
 floods and causes silt pollution problems via increased soil  erosion   (see
 review  by Karr and Schlosser 1977).  The discharge of sewage effluents may
 also be detrimental to fish, but in areas below the septic  zone,  the  more
 constant   flow   of  water  may help to stabilize the downstream fish popula-
 tions during drought periods  (Karr and Dudley 1976).

     Some  indication of the effect of these factor  can be obtained by  com-
 paring  studies in  Black Creek  with work  from other stream areas.  Most
 stream reaches  in Black Creek have been modified significantly in the  past
 few  years.  The only significant exception  is Wertz Woods.  A sample sta-
 tion on Wann Creek was modified about a decade ago  but has  developed  some
 pool and riffle characteristics along with a  diverse vascular plant commun-
 ity  in and near the stream channel.  Finally, Indian  Creek  in  Tippecanoe
 County  west  of Lafayette, Ind. has also been studied.  Indian Creek is an
 agricultural watershed but most of the stream has not been  ditched.   Thus,
 natural  stream topography  has been maintained and most of  the channel is
 shaded by  trees. The degree of buffering present among our  study  streams
 was evident in  the structure and stability of the resident  fish communities
 (Table 51). Community structure in Black Creek was simple  in each area and
 unstable.   Wann Creek  usually  had a more  diverse community but seasonal
 stability  was low.  Indian Creek and Wertz Woods, however,  had both diverse
 and  relatively  stable communities.

     Even  though Wann Creek was subject to the  same  unstabilizing  influ-
 ences  as   Black Creek it  showed remarkable recovery.  The  stream's habitat
 structure  was more diverse, with greater pool formation and dense  bulrush
 thickets   which stabilized the  stream channel and provided  partial shading.
 This stream structure supported a more diverse community  but  not  a  more
 stable  one.    The unstabilizing influences of massive stream and watershed
 STUDY RESULTS

-------
                                                                         141
                                  TABLE 51
                  Percent Change - Number Species 4 Areas

Stream
Black Creek
Wann Creek
Wertz Woods
Indian Creek
Number of
Fish Species
5(1)*
14(2)
9(1)
10(1)
Number of
Stations
5(1,2,3)*
1(2)
KD
2(1,2)
Mean Percent
June-Sept.
68
70
40
33
Change
1975




* Numbers in parenthesis indicate stream order(s).


modification tend to strip'the stream ecosystem of some  equilibrium  capa-
bility   (homeostatic  mechanism).   Thus, Black Creek and Wann Creek biotic
communities and habitats changed dramatically seasonally.

     In contrast, Indian Creek and Wertz Woods  had  remarkable  complexity
and  stabilized habitat structure allowed the stream some degree of homeos-
tatic equilibrium and was reflected in the stability of the fish community.

     From this study of an assortment of streams  it is evident that natural
processes  and  structures  enhance the reliability of a basically unstable
system.  Habitat complexity increases community diversity and environmental
stability  appears  to. control community stability.  In the succession of a
ditched stream after disturbance, the habitat and community  diversity  re-
cover  first  while  stability  requires  a  longer  period or may never be
achieved as long as  overlying  unstabilizing  influences  persist  on  the
watershed.

     Since large-scale watershed modifications in the U.S.  have  continued
for  perhaps  two  centuries, it is now difficult to evaluate the extent to
which stream communities have been  altered.   Larimore  and  Smith  (1963)
found considerable changes in the fish fauna in Champaign, County, Illinois
in the past 60 years.  The changes they found were associated  with  large-
scale  modification of watersheds.  Recent deterioration of the Great Lakes
fisheries has been tied to over-exploitation of   fish  populations  and  to
massive deforestation and modification of the watersheds over the last cen-
tury (Smith 1972).
                                 References

Gorman, O.T. and J.R. Karr.  1978.  Habitat Structure and Stream Fish  Com-
munities.  Ecology.  In press.

Karr, J.R. and O.T. Gorman.  1975.  Effects of Land Treatment on the Aquat-
ic  Environment.  "Non-Point Source Pollution Seminar" Section 108a Demons-
tration Projects.  Technical Report EPA-906/9-75-007.

Dudley, D.R.  1976.  Determinants of  water  quality  in  the  Black  Creek
watershed.   "Best  Management  Practices  for  the  Control  of  Non-Point
Sources." Section 108a Demonstration Projects.  Technical Report EPA.  14p.


                                                              STUDY RESULTS

-------
 142
Schlosser, I.J.  1977.  Impact of nearstream vegetation and stream morphol-
ogy on water quality and stream biota.  Ecological Research Series U.S. En-
vironmental Protection Agency, Athens, GA.  90pp. (EPA-600/3-77-097).

Larimore, R.W. and P.W. Smith.  1963.  The Fishes of Champaign County,  Il-
linois, as Affected by 60 Years of Stream Changes.  Bull. 111. Natur. Hist.
Surv. 28: 299-382.

Nelson, J.S. and S.D. Gerking.  1968.  Annotated Key to the Fishes of Indi-
ana.  Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana.

Smith, S.H.  1972.  Factors of ecologic  succession  in  oligotrophic  fish
communities  of  the Laurentian Great Lakes.  J. Fish.  Res. Bd. Canada 29;
717-730.

Trautman, M.B.  1957.  The Fishes of Ohio.  Ohio  State  University  Press,
Columbus, Ohio.

4.6 TILE DRAINAGE

4.6.1 Initial Tile Sampling Program

     Approximately fifty percent of the Black Creek Watershed  has  subsur-
face  drainage.   This  was determined by a tile monitoring program in 1974
which entailed each tile outlet in the watershed being located and  sampled
if  flowing.  Table 52 is a summary of this sampling program.  Using an es-
timate of drained area per tile (based on its size)  an estimate of 6000  Ac
of drained land was obtained.
                                  TABLE 52
                  Summary of Initial  Tile Sampling  Program


Ditch
Black Creek
Dreisbach
Richeldfer
Gorrel
Wertz
Smith-Fry
Killian
Lake
Fuelling
Warm*
Total
Black Creek
No.# of
Tile Outlets
Located
88
126
139
95
85
81
69
21
43
102

only 747
No.# with Known
Surface Drain
Inlets
11
16
8
9
—
—
—
2
—
—

46

Tile Outlets
Sampled
29
36
29
29
49
12
10
7
0
65

201
*Not within Black Creek Watershed (adjacent)
     The above tile samples were analyzed for sediment and nutrient concen-
trations.   Table  53 provides the concentration statistics of all the col-
STUDY RESULTS

-------
                                                                         143
 lected  samples.  The water quality of the tiles were not  significantly dif-
 ferent  between  ditches  except  for the soluble nutrients  (see Table 54).
 The Dreisbach and Richelderfer drains were very high in ammonia and  soluble
 phosphorus but relatively low in nitrate.  Wertz and Smith-Fry showed oppo-
 site characteristics.  The high ammonia and soluble phosphorus  levels  are
 directly  attributed to the high septic input  (from Harlan)  to the tiles  in
 the Dreisbach and Richelderfer drains.  The  high  nitrate   levels   in  the
 Wertz   and  Smith-Fry drains result from the more intense row crop agricul-
 ture in these watersheds as compared to the other drains.
                                  TABLE 53
          Concentration of Sediment and Nutrients in Tile Effluent
Component
Sediment
Ammonia
Nitrate
Sol. Org. N
Sed. N
Sol Inorg. P
Sol Org. P
Sed. P
Range G
634
73
43
58
53
7.6
1.45
13.5
eo. Mean
- Ttig/
79
.63
5.9
3.17
6.26
.02
.01
.10
Mean
^
88
2.33
8.95
6.21
9.35
.31
.05
.56
S.D.
52.5
7.9
7.3
10
7.8
1.04
.14
1.75
                                  TABLE 54
            Sediment and Nutrient Concentrations by Ditch - 1974
Mean Concentration (mg/1)
Ditch
Black Creek
Dreisbach
Gorrel
Killian
Wertz
Smith-Fry
Richelderfer
Lake
Wann*
SS
101
101
84
91
74
98
88
110
86
Amm
2.7
9.8
.56
.55
.51
1.0
2.0
5.8
.50
Nit
9.8
7.5
4.6
7.0
10
9.6
10
6.0
10
SON
5.9
4.2
4.1
3.9
3.2
4.7
6.1
26
7.2
SED.N IP
6.3
8.3
7.8
5.2
12
5.0
11
7.4
11
.36
1.3
.05
.06
.02
.15
.19
1.0
.12
SOD
.06
.14
.01
.05
.02
.09
.05
.01
.02
SED.P
.45
.80
.08
.05
.04
.16
.22
2.7
.87
*Not in Black Creek Watershed (adjacent)
     No significant difference in sediment or  nutrient  concentration  was
observed  between  tiles  of  different flow.  This is expected because the
higher flows are achieved when larger areas are drained and not  by  a  la-
teral  system  design  or moisture difference.  It should be noted that the
sampling program took several weeks  to  complete,  but  the  general  area
remained dry for the entire period.
                                                              STUDY RESULTS

-------
144


4.6.2 Tile Monitoring Continued Program

     After the analysis of the 1974 sampling program it  was  decided  that
tile  effluent  in Black Creek needed further study.  The initial study did
not provide for any time dependence within  the  data.   Therefore,  twenty
representive tile outlets were selected for a continued monitoring program.
Septic influence, flat and rolling land, intensity of farming, artesian wa-
ter, size of drainage area, etc. were all considered.

     This additional tile data served to verify the conclusions of the ini-
tial  sampling  program  and also indicated some significant time dependent
effects.  The concentration of all sediment and nutrient components  varied
dramatically with time.  A trend could not be determined for the concentra-
tions of any component response to tile flow.  Table 55 shows the R-squared
values  of  the correlation study.  It is obvious that the flow does influ-
ence concentration but not always in the same  way.   Table  56  shows  the
overall statistical results for two years of data for the twenty sites com-
bined.  The high range in the data is evidence of the  flow  effects.   The
high range in the 1974 data (initial study) is due to the variety of tiles,
not flow.
                                  TABLE 55
  Values for Exponential Fit - Tile Flow and Sediment-Nutrient Components
Tile                 R-Squared-Value
Site   SS   Amm    Nit   TN    SN    IP    TP    SP

  1  -.076 -.086  .029 -.005 -.010 -.049 -.044 -.046
  2   .127  .004  .000  .026 -.020  .116  .187  .081
  3   .004  .003  .000  .003  .000  .009  .056  .020
  4   .083  .064  .050  .070  .056  .208  .195  .185
  5   .030  .239  .131  .167  .166  .151  .310  .335
  6   .090  .066  .014  .026  .019  .229  .225  .088
  7   .118  .051  .013  .058  .020  .406  .253  .279
  8   .014  .220 -.050 -.017 -.026  .385  .449  .553
  9  -.025  .000  .106  .093  .121  .046  .456  .034
 10   .009  .020 -.013  .000  .000  .010  .219  .013
 11   .323  .053  .083  .015  .027 -.248 -.269 -.195
 12   .004  .029  .018  .038  .019  .138  .156  .108
 13   .033  .030 -.026 -.001 -.005  .545  .449  .522
 14  -.001 -.022  .057  .002  .000  .077  .068  .093
 15  -.017 -.009  .003 -.056 -.058  .000  .000  .000
 16   .240 -.077 -.014 -.003 -.174 -.036 -.001 -.036
 17  -.178 -.021 -.046 -.039 -.036  .037  .154  .031
 18   .054  .158 -.001  .010  .000  .544  .502  .506
 19  -.012  .065  .081  .067  .081  .201  .264  .089
 20   .273  .013 -.106  .000 -.109  .409  .394  .112
                        Number of samples = 34/site
STUDY RESULTS

-------
                                                                        145
                                  TABLE 56
         Concentration of Sediment  and Nutrients  for  20 Tile  Sites
Component

Sediment
Ammonia
Nitrate
Sol. Org. N
Sed. N
Sol Inorg. P
Sol Org. P
Sed. P
Range
	
12,900
41
49
151
47
52
9.
39
Geo. Mean
	 mg/1-
76
.35
6.16
.07
.31
.03
3 .03
.07
Mean
	
Ill
1.70
8.72
.96
.93
.34
.06
.37
S.D.
	
496
4.85
6.80
6.83
2.74
2.28
.37
1.90
4.6.3 Results of Automatic Tile Sampler

     An automatic tile sampler was developed to  help  determine   the   time
dependent relationships in tile flow.  The data will also be helpful in the
calibration of a tile flow model which  is  being  developed   (see Section
0.0.2).

     The automatic tile sampler has been operational since March,  1976  on a
43  acre  Hoytville soil.  The tile drainage system is uniform with no  sur-
face inlets.  The two years of record are for a  below  average  tile   flow
period, because of the relatively low rainfall during late winter  and early
spring which is normally the high flow period for tiles.  1976 was the  dri-
est  of  the two years.  Table 57 shows the results of the sediment and nu-
trient losses from the tile site. It is estimated that a more  normal   out-
flow figure would be between 5-10 cm/year.  Note that in both years the ni-
trate losses greatly exceeded all other losses except for sediments.


                                  TABLE 57
 Sediment and Nutrient Losses from Tile Effluent - Automatic Sampling Site
Component
Sediment
Ammonia
Nitrate
Sol. Org. N
Sed. N
Sol Inorg. P
Sol. Org. P
Sed. P
Outflow
Rainfall
1976
\rn
Kg,
20.5
.011
.678
.053
.112
.002
.005
.019
1.22 cm
65.70 cm
1977*
53.9
.27
10.6
3.14
.65
.051
.019
.141
6.91 cm
45.50 cm
*Through 7/6/77
                                                              STUDY RESULTS

-------
146
     The concentration data did vary with flow but not as  dramatically  as
some  other tiles in the Black Creek Watershed.  Sediment and nutrient com-
ponents all tended to increase with increased flow.  This response  is  not
linear  and  tends  to be more dramatic during the leading edge of a hydro-
graph then during the trailing edge (see Figure 17).  An  initial  flashing
action seems to be present.  Flow vs. concentration correlation results are
given in Table 58.  Table 59 shows the average concentration  of  the  tile
effluent for the two years.
                                  TABLE 58
           R-Squared Values for the Automatic Tile Sampling Site
Variables
R-Squared
Independent Dependent Linear Fit

Stage SS
Aram
Nit
TN
SN
IP
TP
SP
Flow SS
Amm
Nit
TN
SN
IP
TP
SP
Sus. Solids Amm
Nit
TN
SN
IP
TP
SP
No.# of Samples
1976
.676
.200
.809
.801
.798
.611
.860
.538
.699
.179
.802
.795
.784
.632
.866
.524
.104
.611
.606
.592
.620
.850
.537
47
1977
.152
.336
.040
.318
.332
.408
.143
.391
.182
.371
.036
.359
.372
.454
.168
.438
.197
-.004
.203
.184
.328
.353
.330
180
Exponential Fit
1976
.715
.006
.866
.830
.841
.538
.886
.544
.733
-.007
.840
.806
.809
.545
.867
.522
-.009
.649
.565
.626
.446
.787
.567
47
1977
.121
.304
.045
.253
.261
.516
.268
.437
.145
.325
.044
.281
.286
.525
.292
.465
.148
.002
.141
.113
.169
.366
.203
180
   The R-squared values may be misleading because of times
   series dependence which exists in the data.
   It would be more realistic to assume the number of degrees of freedom
   to be less than fifteen which would yield a 5% significant
   level of R-squared = 0.3.
     The field monitored is nearly flat and has raised field borders.  This
prevents  any  surface runoff and could be considered an ideal BMP for ero-
sion control and soil conservation.  Because of this unique  situation,  we
were  able  to measure total field losses by simply monitoring the tile ef-
fluent.  As a result of forcing all the water  through  the  soil  profile,
STUDY RESULTS

-------
         suinsan AOOLS
                SUSPENDED SOLIDS  (100 X MG/LITER)
f
ro
1
CO -j
1
P* en
L. .,_ 	 I
                         FLOW  (LITERS/SEC)
     O
     ro
    CO m
o
3=
-<
CO
                                                  O    en    o

                                               RAIN (MM/HR)

-------
348                                 TABLE  59
       Concentration of Tile Effluent from Automatic Sampling Site by Year
Component


Sediment
Ammonia
Nitrate
Sol. Org. N
Sed. N
Sol. Inorg. P
Sol. Org. P
Sed. P
1976

mg/i
170
.09
5.6
.44
.92
.02
.04
.22
1977*


78
.38
15.3
4.5
.93
.07
.03
.20
   *Through 7/6/77


   sediment and nutrient losses were greatly reduced.  This is due to both the
   reduced  water loss and the reduced concentration of the nutrient and sedi-
   ment, except for nitrate-N whose concentration would  not  necessarily  de-
   crease.  However, the reduced water loss was much more significant than the
   change in nitrate-N concentration.  See Table 57  (Also Table 0  in  Section
   0.0.0) for a comparison of results.

        The amount of fertilizer nutrients lost was not large.  The field mon-
   itored received amounts of fertilizer (180 kg/ha -N and 70 kg/ha -P) in ex-
   cess of the Black Creek average.  Even at this higher fertilizer rate,  the
   annual losses of N and P as compared to the amount applied were less then 6
   and .2 percent respectively for the wetter of the two years monitored.

        The hydrologic response of the tile system on the  Hoytville  soil  is
   ver^   ^jd.  Peak flows occurred within 5 to 7 hours of all rain storms and
   generally returned to zero flow within a week.  Deep cracking may L'i a con-
   tributing factor to this rapid hydrological response of the tile system.

   4.6.4 Pesticide and Herbicide Response

        Both insecticide and herbicide contamination was detected in the  tile
   effluent  shortly  after a surface application of these chemicals.  The in-
   secticide used was Furadan and the herbicide used was Lasso II.  The  accu-
   mulative  losses of Furadan and Lasso II per hectare were  .014 and  .003 ki-
   lograms respectively with the peak concentration in ppm reaching  .213  and
   .042  respectively.  Herbicide and pesticide losses were of the order of .1
   percent of applied.  The movement of these pesticides is due mostly to  the
   deep cracking, which gives water an open channel to flow to the tiles.

   4.6.5 Stream Grab Sampling Program

        A stream  grab  sampling  program  was  started  in   the  Black  Creek
   Watershed  in  March,  1973.   Nineteen sites were selected for monitoring.
   (See Section 0.0.1.1.) The Maumee, St. Mary  and  St.  Joseph  rivers  were
   among  these selected sites.  Samples are collected at least once a week at
   each site.  Grab sites 2, 6 and 12 were monitored more intensively with the
   installation of an automatic pumping sampler.

        The additional data obtained at sites 2 and 6  showed that  the  grab
   samples  alone  could  not adequately describe the loadings of sediment and
   nutrients from the site's associated watershed.  Grab samples alone greatly
   under  predicted the annual loading for all sediment associated components.
   Soluble components were better described by the grab samples, but their as-
   STUDY RESULTS

-------
                                                                        149


sociated  error would still be high.  Table 60 gives a quantitative view of
the inherent weakness of a grab sampling at an interval  greater  than  the
time  response  of  the  watershed.   The hydrological time response of the
Black Creek Watershed is of the order of hours compared to  a  weekly  sam-
pling rate.
                                  TABLE 60
               Prediction of Loading From Complete Data Base
Loading Prediction (kg/Ha)
Weekly Grab Only*

Component
Sus. Solids
Ammonia
Nitrate
Sol. Org. N
Sed. N
Sol. Inorg. P
Sol. Org. P
Sed. P
Site
1975
572
1.21
14
1.4
3.2
.09
.09
.61
2
1976
178
.59
2.95
.63
.91
.04
.04
.20
Site
1975
869
2.4
9.4
2.0
6.7
.26
.10
1.4
6
1976
142
1.3
1.3
.88
.75
.21
.04
.27
Complete
Site
1975
2130
1.5
19.0
1.7
31
.14
.097
5.2
2
1976
640
.60
5.5
.31
3.9
.064
.034
.98
Data File
Site
1975
3740
1.8
12.0
2.3
28.0
.34
.12
4.5
6
1976
380
.85
2.4
.53
2.8
.18
.040
.73
   Flow data for computation does use the complete
   flow record, not just that associated with the given grab
   sample.
   Using the qrab flow record only would cause even larger errors
     A strong annual cycle existed for  the  concentration  of  nitrate  in
streams  as seen in Figure 18.  To a much lesser degree, the cycle also ex-
ists for ammonia.  The nitrate and  ammonia  concentrations  peaked  during
late winter or spring.  The high percent of tile flow and fertilizer appli-
cation during this period could account for some of the increase in nitrate
levels.   Also  the biomass uptake of nitrogen would tend to lower the con-
centrations of both nitrate and ammonia in the summer  months.   Phosphorus
and suspended solids showed no annual variation.

     Correlation analysis of the grab and automatic  pumping  sampler  data
combined showed a positive correlation between flow and sediment associated
components and also between suspended solids and  sediment  associated  nu-
trients.   The  soluble  nutrients are generally not correlated with either
flow, stage or sediment.  Table 61 gives a summary of the R-squared  values
from  sites 2 and 6 for the years 1975-76.  The low R-square values are in-
dicative of the high degree of scatter observed in  the  data.   Figure  19
shows  a  plot of stage vs. suspended solids.  Similar scatter was observed
for the nutrients. An exponential curve fit was also tried but did not sig-
nificantly  improve  the  R-squared  values as see in Table 62.  The low R-
squared values  also  show  that  functional  expressions  would  not  well
represent the data.

     The correlation of the sediment and sediment-bound nutrients may be  a
little  misleading because of strong time series dependence in the samples.
                                                              STUDY RESULTS

-------
                                                                                                        m
                  Figure  18. Nitrate Concentration vs. Time for Weekly Grab Samples
  25.00
  20.00-
   15.00-
CE
   10.00-
   5.00
    .00-
  -6.00
                                                                N03-N
                                                                SITE  2
                                                                1973  -  1977
156.    •  312.      468.
                                           624.      780.
                                               TIME- DflYS
936.     1092.      1248.      1404.      1560.

-------
   4.000
   3.625-
   3.250-
0_
Q_

CO
a
   2.875 -
   2.500-
Q
UJ
O
~Z.
UJ
Q_
CO
ID
CO

CD
IED
   2.125-
   1.750 -
   1.375 -
   1.000
           SITE     2.   1975
                              Figure 19. Suspended Solids vs Stage
        .000      1.000      2.000      3.000
                              STflGE  (FTJ
                                                   4.000
                                                                   151
5.000
A more realistic number of degrees of freedom would be 20 or less.  If  the
different  hydrological  conditions  of the watershed between the ascending
and receding sides of the hydrograph were  considered  separately,  an  im-
provement  is  expected  in the correlations.  This is indicated by the two
distinct scatter patterns in Figure 19.
                                                         STUDY RESULTS

-------
152

 4.7  TILLAGE STUDIES

      It was predicted,  prior to the undertaking of the Black Creek project,
 that alteration of tillage systems could have a significant impact on water
 quality in Black Creek  and by extension in the entire Maumee Basin.   These
 initial  expectations  were  confirmed by simulated rainfall investigations
 during the project (see Section

      The fact that water quality can be improved by tillage  systems  which
 increase  surface  cover  and residue and which minimize moldboard plowing,
 does not guarantee that such systems will be economically feasible or that,
 if  feasible,  they will be voluntarily adopted by landowners in the Maumee
 Basin.  The tillage studies undertaken in the Black Creek project  had  the
 dual  purpose of investigating potential costs, yields, and profits of con-
 servation tillage systems on the soils of the study area and  of  providing
 demonstrations of these tillage systems for area landowners.

      Tillage studies were begun in 1974 on individual farms with  the  work
 conducted by the landowners.  This procedure was not entirely satisfactory,
 as the experimental work often conflicted with regular farm  operations  on
 which the landowners were dependent for their livelihood.  As a result, ex-
 perimental work suffered.  Beginning with the 1976 crop year,  more  tradi-
 tional  tillage  investigations  utilizing  replicated  plots  farmed under
 closely controlled conditions were begun.

      One of the original farmer-tillage demonstrations was carried  on  for
 three  years,  1974-76.  Yields were compared on three different soil types
 in this field.  Average yields for the three years across all soils  showed
 both  chisel  and  disk  tillage systems to be very competitive with either
 fall or spring moldboard plowing.

      Five typical soil  types were selected on which to  perform  replicated
 studies.  Other areas were used as needed to obtain additional information.
 All  study areas were fertilized and limed according to Purdue soil  testing
 laboratory  recommendations. Nitrogen was applied to the corn ground at the
 rate of 170 Ibs actual  N per acre, using 28 percent liquid nitrogen.  Phos-
 phorus  and potassium were broadcast on all plots in the fall ahead of fall
 tillage every other year.  Furadan was band applied for insect  control  on
 all   corn  plots.   Herbicides were applied pre-emergence at planting.  All
 chemicals, costs, and rates are reported later.

      All 1976 tillage work was done in the spring due to  late  acquisition
 of  the  land  and equipment.  Primary tillage for the 1977 season was com-
 pleted in the fall.

      The corn hybrid used was Pioneer 3780, and the bean variety was  Amsoy
 71  in 1976 and Shawnee in 1977.  Corn seeding rate was 24,000 per acre for
 all  plots.  Soybean seeding rate was 48 Ibs/Ac for all plots.  Corn  yields
 were  corrected  to 15  1/2 percent moisture, and bean yields to 13 1/2 per-
 cent moisture.

      Four tillage systems were investigated:

      1.  NO-TIL — the only pre-plant activity was chopping the stalks.

      2.  CHISEL — the soil was chisel plowed 8" to  10"  deep  and  disked
 STUDY RESULTS

-------
                                                                         153
 once or  twice prior  to planting,  as needed  for  a satisfactory seed-bed.

      3.   DISK —  two diskings  to  a 4"  depth prior  to  planting  were  used
 with no  primary tillage.

      4.   CONVENTIONS! —   the  soil was moldboard plowed  and   disked  twice
 before planting.

      In  1976  corn was not  cultivated,  but all beans were  cultivated, except
 the   no-til   plots.    In   1977 all plots except no-til  were cultivated. All
 tillage  systems were repeated  for corn after corn,  corn  after  beans,  and
 beans after corn.  For the first  year, 1976, the previous crop was  the  same
 for  all  systems.  It was necessary to  change row direction on  two   of  the
 experiments.    On these,  early spring disking  was  necessary  for the no-til
 plots in 1976.

      Although replicated tillage  comparisons were begun in 1976, the effect
 of previous crops on tillage success could  not  be determined  until  1977 and
 is not included in this report.   For corn,  the  three  conservation   tillage
 systems   yielded  as  well as or better  than  conventional tillage on  4 of the
 5 soils  in 1976.  Yields were  not checked on Nappanee silt loam in  1976 due
 to extreme variation in the experimental area.

      1977 corn  harvest was not yet complete as  this  report   was prepared.
 Yield data   gathered   so   far shows all conservation tillage systems below
 conventional  on poorly drained Hoytville and Nappanee  soils.    Corn yield
 with  chisel   tillage  equalled conventional corn  on better drained  Whitaker
 and Haskins soils.   (Data  from Morley  soils not yet available.)

      Soybean  yields  were not significantly  different  among tillage   systems
 in  1976  on  upland  Morley   and   Haskins  soils.   Disk and no-till soybean
 yields were slightly reduced on Whitaker loam and severely reduced  on Nap-
 panee silt   loam.   Increased phytophthora root rot with disk and no-till
 systems appeared  to  be the major cause of reduced yields.

      Canada thistle, morning glory,  and field bindweed  were   a  problem  in
 spots in  the  experimental areas but had little  influence on yields.

      In 1977, dry weather after planting caused reduced and delayed  germi-
 nation  leading  to  more variation  than usual  in plant stands among  treat-
ments.  Phytophthora root rot was much less  severe  than in  1976,   but  was
 again more prevalent in disk and no-till soybeans.  Canada thistle, morning
glory, and field bindweed were greater problems in  1977, were   more   diffi-
cult  to control in soybeans than in corn, and were  usually more severe with
no-plow tillage systems.

     In 1977 bean yields with all conservation  tillage systems  were greatly
reduced  on Hoytville and Nappanee soils, slightly  reduced on Whitaker, and
equal to or greater  than conventional yields on Morley and Haskins  soils.

     Previous research in Indiana has identified the  major  factors  which
influence corn response to tillage.

     These are:

     a.   Soil drainage — the better drained the  soil,   the  less  tillage
                                                              STUDY RESULTS

-------
154
                                  TABLE 61
                Linear  Correlation Results  for  Sites  2  and 6
R-Squared Value
Variables
Independent
Stage







Dependent
SS
Amm
Nit
TN
SN
IP
TP
SP
Suspended Sol. Aram






Flow






Nit
TN
SN
IP
TP
SP
SS
Amm
Nit
TN
SN
IP
SP
No.# of Samples
Site
1975
.246
.000
-.030
.271
-.028
.013
.367
.010
-.001 -
-.106
.333
-.103 -
.033 -
.519
.022 -
.212
-.001 -
-.075
.222
-.072
.001 -
.001 -
646
2
1976
.175
.000
.078
.264
.057
.002
.272
.004
.064
.000
.170
.006
.063
.276
.080
.164
.005
.012
.127
.005
.001
.001
396
Site
1975
.413
-.030 -
-.010
.232
-.014 -
.023 -
.092
.026 -
-.007 -
-.078
.349
-.068 -
-.018 -
.114
-.010 -
.393
-.007 -
-.028
.037
-.025 -
-.006 -
-.005 -
461
6
1976
.191
.096
.050
.187
.006
.028
.173
.030
.023
.000
.600
.030
.064
.570
.065
.247
.068
.010
.173
.023
.047
.050
409
needed.

     b.  Previous crop — shallow or no-tillage planting is more likely  to
be successful for corn in rotation.

     c.  Latitude — shallow or no-tillage planting is more  likely  to  be
successful in areas with a longer growing season.

     d.  Pest control — where weeds, insects and diseases cannot  be  ade-
quately controlled with chemicals, no-plow tillage is not likely to be suc-
cessful .

     Research so far in the  Black  Creek  study  tends  to  support  these
points.

     1976 and 1977 yield results are presented in the following tables.  It
should  be  noted that tillage systems must be evaluated over several years
to accurately determine their success on different soil types.
STUDY RESULTS

-------
                                                                        155
4.7.1 Hoytville Silty Clay Loam
                                 TABLE 62
             Exponential Correlation Results for Site 2 and 6
R-Squared Value

Variables
Independent Dependent








Stage SS
Anrn
Nit
TN
SN
IP
TP
SP
Suspended Sol. Amm














No.
Nit
TN
SN
IP
TP
SP
Flow SS
Amm
Nit
TN
SN
IP
TP
SP
# of Samples
Site 2
1975
.439
.001
-.003
.328
-.007
.097
.466
.041
.000
-.048
.384
-.055
.154
.761
.157
.295
-.004
-.035
.189
-.049
.016
.307
.009
646
1976
.308
.002
.188
.349
.141
.042
.307
.038
-.046
.072
.279
.024
-.010
.338
-.033
.238
-.003
.045
.137
.025
.013
.190
.009
396
Site 6
1975
.617
-.012
.000
.301
-.005
.051
.429
.046
-.006
-.030
.430
-.041
.035
.626
.045
.218
-.007
-.018
.035
-.019
-.004
.058
-.006
461
1976
.242
-.073
.097
.241
.000
-.023
.186
-.022
-.025
.031
.484
-.012
-.062
.398
-.073
.239
-.081
.025
.173
-.013
-.040
.149
-.043
409
                                 TABLE 63
                     Corn Response to Tillage System
Tillage
No-til (b)
Double disk
Chisel
Plow
(a) Any yields
Plants/Ac
1976 1977
21,500
22,015
18,937
19,640
followed by the
8
8
11
17
,500
,600
,200
,200
Bu/Ac
1976 (a) 1977
134.9 b
139. 2ab
144. la
124.8 c
same letter are not
different at the 10% level.
(b) These plots
were disked once
in 1976
to change
92.0
90.8
105.0
120.4
significantly

row direction.
                                                             STUDY RESULTS

-------
 156
                                  TABLE 64
                     Soybean Response to Tillage System
                           Bu/Ac
  Tillage             1976(a)    1977

No-til(b)           31.8a        35.7
Double disk         32.4a        35.2
Chisel              31.Sab       33.4
Plow                28.3 b       40.4

(a)  Any yields followed by the same letter are not significantly
    different at the 10% level.
(b)  These plots were disked once in 1976 to change row direction.

Planting dates:  Corn—May 5, 1976; Soybeans—May 25, 1976
                     —May 11, 1977         —May 25, 1977
     This experimental area was in soybeans in 1975.  In 1976, chisel  pro-
vided  highest corn yield and conventional the lowest, with shallow tillage
intermediate.  Conventional bean yields were also lowest in 1976.  The con-
ventional  system  was  at  a disadvantage on this soil because of the poor
seedbed and delayed emergence associated with spring plowing.

     In 1977 the situation was essentially reversed, with all no-plow  sys-
tems  having greatly reduced germination in the early season drought.  Con-
ventional tillage gave best stands and yields for both corn and soybeans.


4.7.2 Nappanee Silt Loam


                                  TABLE 65
                      Corn Response to Tillage System
Plants/Ac
Tillage
No- til
Double disk
Chisel
Plow
1976
19,000
19,000
20,625
20,000
1977
16,000
18,700
19,500
21,800
Bu/Ac
1976
No Data
No Data
No Data
No Data
1977
76.6
105.7
111.2
126.6
     The experimental area was in  corn  in  1975.   Due  to  variation  in
drainage  and  nitrogen  deficiency, no corn yields were taken in 1976.  In
1977, stands with the conservation tillage systems were  reduced  slightly,
for  corn,  but  yield  reductions  were greater than would be indicated by
stand losses on this very poorly drained soil.

     Soybean yields with no-til and disk tillage were severely  reduced  in
STUDY RESULTS

-------
                                                                         157
                                   TABLE 66
                      Soybean Response to Tillage System
Tillage
No- til
Double disk
Chisel
Plow
(a) Yields followed
different at the
Bu/Ac
1976 (a)
7.8 c
7.9 c
17.2 b
29. 8a
by the same
90% level.
1977
28.5
32.3
36.7
48.7
letter


are not significantly
j Planting dates:  Corn—May 11, 1976; Soybeans—May 25, 1976
i                      —May 12, 1977          —May 20, 1977
 1976.  Yield with chiseling was intermediate between no-til and convention-
 al.   The  same  yield  pattern  occurred in 1977, but reductions were much
 less.  Much of the yield loss appeared to be due to phytophthora root  rot.
 This  disease is known to be more damaging in poorly aerated soils, but the
 great difference in infection related to tillage depth was surprising.


 4.7.3 Whitaker Loan
                                  TABLE  67
                       Corn Response to Tillage System
Tillage
No-til(b)
Double disk
Chisel
Plow
Plants/Ac
1976 1977
29,843
20,953
20,859
14,937
19
19
22
23
,100
,800
,300
,200
1976
142
145
150
142
.9
.7
.3
.6
Bu/Ac
(a) 1977
131.
145.
153.
155.
2
7
7
6
(a) Yields were not significantly different at the 90% level.
(b) Plots were disked once in 1976 to accomodate change in row
direction.
i
      This experimental area was in soybeans in 1975.   There was no signifi-
 cant  difference in corn yield among tillage treatments in 1976, but no-til
 yields were reduced in 1977.  Shallow seed placement  in 1977  no-til  plots
 led to delayed germination, the most likely cause of  yield loss.

      Deep tillage,  plowing and chiseling apparently improved soybean yields
 in  1976  and no-til yields were also reduced in 1977.   Again, phytophthora
                                                               STUDY RESULTS

-------
158
                                 TABLE 68
                     Soybean Response  to Tillage  System

Tillage
No-til (b)
Double disk
Chisel
Plow
Bu/Ac
1976 (a) 1977
34.2 c 42.0
39.8 b 45.6
41. lab 44.3
44. 8a 48.8
(a)  Yields followed by the same letter are not significantly
    different at the 90% level.
(b)  Plots were disked once in 1976 to accomodate change in row
    direction.

Planting dates:  Corn—April 23, 1976; Soybeans—May 21, 1976
                     —May 10, 1977            —May 26, 1977


root rot appeared to contribute to these yield losses.

     This is one of the better drained soils in the watershed and is a soil
where  we  would  expect disk and no-til yields to be competitive with deep
tillage for corn.  There is insufficient experience to make similar predic-
tions for soybeans.


4.7.4 Morley Silt Loam
                                  TABLE 69
                Corn and Soybean Response to Tillage System
Tillage (b)
No- til
Chisel
Plow
Corn,
Plant/Ac
20,281
18,812
17,609
1976 (a)
Bu/Ac (c)
91.1
89.5
88.2
Soybeans ,
1976 (c)
23.2
21.7
24.3
Bu/Ac
1977
35.1
30.1
29.1
 (a) 1977 corn plots were not harvested when this report was prepared.
 (b) Due to a space limitation the disk treatment was omitted at this
    site.
 (c) Yields were not significantly different at the 90% level.

Planting dates:  Corn—May 13, 1976; Soybeans—May 27, 1976
                     —May 17, 1977          —May 23, 1977
     The 1975 crop at this site was corn.  Yield differences for both  corn
and soybeans were not significant in 1976.  No-til bean yields were highest
in 1977.  It is important to note that conservation  tillage  systems  were
STUDY RESULTS

-------
                                                                          159
 equal to plowing on this erosive soil.
 4.7.5 Haskins Loam
                                  TABLE 70
                       Corn Response to Tillage System
Plants/Ac
Tillage
No-til
Double disk
Chisel
Plows
1976
21,156
20,453
21,000
20,500
1977
16,500
20,400
21,200
22,600
Bu/Ac
1976 (a)
121. 9a
105.8 b
111.7 b
111.5 b
1977
110.8
118.7
126.7
129.0
 (a)  Yields followed by the same letter  are not significantly
     different at the 90%  level.
                                  TABLE 71
                     Soybean Response to Tillage System
Bu/Ac
Tillage
No-til
Double disk
Chisel
Plow
1976 (a)
24.0
24.4
20.8
25.7
1977
43.3
43.5
46.5
44.5
 (a) Yields not significantly different at  the 90%  level.  •

 Planting dates:  Corn—May 12, 1976; Soybeans—May 27,  1976
                     —May 16, 1977          —May 23,  1977
     Corn was grown in this experimental area in 1975.  No-til  corn  yield
was  better than other systems in 1976, showing less drought stress in mid-
summer.  Moisture conserved by the surface residues  was  important  during
this period.  In 1977, no-til stand and yield were both lower than for oth-
er systems for corn.  There was little difference among tillage systems  in
soybean yield in either year.
4.7.6 Chemicals Applied to Replicated Plots

     The following chemicals and rates were used both years.
were typical retail prices in the area.
Prices  used
                                                              STUDY RESULTS

-------
 160
                                 TABLE 72
                   Costs for Chemicals,  Corn and Soybean

For corn
Aatrex 4L, 1 qt/Ac @ 4.08/qt
Bladex 4L, 1 qt/Ac @ 4.00/qt
Lasso, 2 qts/Ac @ 3.87/qt
Furadan, 10#/Ac @ .76/lb
Paraquat, 1 pt/Ac @ 4.99/pt
Total
For soybeans
Lorox, 2#/Ac @ 3.70/lb
Lasso, 2 qt/Ac @ 3.87/qt
Paraquat, 1 pt/Ac @ 4.99/pt
Total
Cost for plows,
chisel, disk
$4.08
4.00
7.74
6.70

$22.52

7.40
7.74

$15.14
Cost for
no-til
$4.08
4.00
7.74
6.70
4.99
$27.51

7.40
7.74
4.99
$20.13
4.7.7 Tillage Demonstrations

     This continuous corn tillage trial on the Roger Ehle farm was  one  of
the  original  farmer-cooperator  demonstrations started in 1974.  Although
not replicated, the trial is interesting because the  tillage  plots  cross
three  soil types in the same field, and because the years ranged from very
dry (1974), to very wet (1975), with 1976 being closer to "average."

     Yields from  the  soil  types  reflect  the  differences  in  seasons.
Response to tillage is not so clear-cut.  Two things stand out in the data.
First, fall chisel yields were as good as, or better  than,  other  systems
across  all conditions.  And, second, no-til yields tended to be less under
all conditions.  We cannot fully  explain  the  no-til  response.   Surface
residue  systems are usually more successful on droughty soils such as Osh-
temo.
                                  TABLE 73
              Corn Response to Tillage, Roger Ehle Farm,  Bu/Ac
                    Rensselaer CL 1.
                      74   75   76
No-Til               128  115  125
Disk, Spring & Fall  187  138  164
Fall Chisel          184  143  162
Fall Plow            118  137
Spring Plow          168  139  161
  Whitaker 1.
 74   75   76
 81  129  101
 94  152  116
111  164  122
 80  143   -
 72  151  134
              3 Year
             Average
Oshtemo FSL  All Soil
74   75   76   Types
27  137   93
30  159   96
54  166  102
64  167   -
21  166   90
104
126
134
122
 STUDY  RESULTS

-------
                                                                       161
     In 1976, corn was planted into standing red clover 8"-10"  in  height,
an  intercrop  from the previous year's wheat.  Soil types were Haskins and
Morley silt loam.  Planting date  was  May  20  and  final  population  was
19,500/Ac.   Fertilizer  applied was the same as for replicated plots.  The
following chemicals were applied at planting:
                                  TABLE 74
                       Chemicals Applied at Planting
Aatrex 4L, 1.2 qt/Ac @ 4.08/qt  =  $4.90
Bladex 4L, 1.2 qt/Ac @ 4.00/qt  =   4.80
Lasso, 2.4 qt/Ac @ 3.87/qt      =   9.29
Paraquat, 2 pts/Ac @ 4.99/pt    =   9.98
Furadan, 10#/Ac @ 0.67/lb       =   6.70
     Stand was reduced in several places in the demonstration due to rodent
damage.   The  legume growth was greater than is recommended for no-til sod
planting.  Either taking an early hay crop or chemically  killing  the  sod
when about four inches in height would have allowed easier coulter penetra-
tion and provided less cover for rodents.  Machine harvest  of  this  four-
acre demonstration yielded 98.2 bu/Ac, about equal to conventionally tilled
corn in the area.  Stress symptoms were much less severe in the sod-planted
corn during summer drought.

     Corn was no-til planted in soybean stubble in 1976.  This was a  seven
acre  demonstration  near  one  of the replicated tillage experiments, with
chemicals and fertilizer applied as in  the  replicated  study.   Corn  was
planted  on  April  22  on erosive Morley and Haskins silt loam soils.  The
machine harvest yield was 102.9 bu/Ac.  The demonstration  was  quite  suc-
cessful, with an excellent stand and good weed control.

4.8 SOCIO-ECONOMIC STUDIES

     Socio-economic studies in the Black Creek Watershed involved the  col-
lection of primary data from farmers in the watershed in order to determine
changing attitudes of farmers toward soil  conservation  practices  and  to
determine  the cost of alternative soil conservation practices.  The diver-
sity of soil types, farm sizes, cultural situations  and  management  prac-
tices  in the watershed provided information on a variety of farming situa-
tions.  The following material summarizes the approach of  the  study,  the
survey instruments used for data collection, the model design and results.

     The approach  to  the  sociological  portion  of  the  study  involves
analysis  of  those  factors  which influence the decision of the farmer to
adopt conservation practices.  These factors are related to  those  aspects
of  the  Black  Creek Project which are policy instruments which can be al-
tered to influence the rate and extent of adoption  of  conservation  prac-
tices .

     The approach to the economic portion of the study includes analysis of
the economic gain or loss to individual farmers that results from utilizing
                                                              STUDY RESULTS

-------
 162
alternative conservation practices rather than currently prevalent  methods
of  crop  production.  The results for the individual farmer are aggregated
to determine the relative  cost  of  instituting  alternative  conservation
practices in the watershed.

     Since data were needed from the farmers in the watershed, a survey in-
strument was prepared to obtain these data.  The instrument was employed at
two different time periods two years apart.  This was necessary  to  obtain
estimates of the changes in attitudes of farmers toward conservation during
the operation of the project.  The data were obtained for  the  survey  in-
strument by personal interview of farmers in the watershed.

     The model design of the study is divided L, j two sections.  One  sec-
tion  describes  the  model  used in sociological research while the second
section describes the model used in the economic research.

4.8.1 Model:  Sociological

     The questionnaires which were administered (in  1974  and  1976)  were
designed  to  measure  characteristics of the farming operation, as well as
various social, psychological, and economic characteristics of the  farmer,
including his attitudes toward pollution, government and toward the project
itself.  The specific variables used in this study are described below:


    XI  Education (EDUCA) is the level of education completed by the farmer
    in actual years.

    X2  Socio-economic status (SES) is the gross annual income of the farm-
    er, in dollars, plus the total number of acres in his farm.

    X3  Perceived need for innovation (NEED)  is an  index  of  8  questions
    aimed  at  assessing the farmer's perception of the adequacy and effec-
    tiveness of pollution control efforts prior to the project.  The lowest
    value possible was 8 and the highest possible was 32.

    X4  Off-farm employment (OFFFARM)  is measured by  the  percent  of  the
    farmer's 1973 family income which came from his off-farm employment.

    X5  Leadership score (LEADER)  is  the  actual  number  of  sociometric
    choices  the  farmer  received  when  respondents  were asked who was a
    well-respected farmer in the area.

    X6  Ethnic group (ETHGRP)  is a  dichotomous  variable  which  indicates
    whether  the  farmer  is Amish or Non-Amish.  It is coded  (1) for Amish
    and (2)  for Non-Amish.

    X7  Advice from leader (ADVICE) indicates whether the farmer has sought
    advice  about  farming practices from the person he selected as a well-
    respected farmer  —  referred  to  here  as  "LEADERS",  the  variable
    representing  community  leadership.   It is coded (0) for "no" and (1)
    for "yes".

    X8  Agency Contact (AGENCYCT) is an index of the amount of contact  the
    farmer has had with each of the agencies involved in the project during
    the past year.  For each agency the actual number of contracts was cod-
STUDY RESULTS

-------
                                                                        163

    ed  unless  the  number  exceeded four.  The scores for each agency are
    then summed to yield a total score for each farmer.

    X9  Knowledge of the project (KNOW) is an index of two questions   indi-
    cating whether the farmer had knowledge of the project and was familiar
    with its intentions as of January, 1974.  It is scored from  (0) for  no
    familiarity to (4) for much familiarity.

    Xll Participation in the project (TAKEPART) indicates  whether  and  to
    what  extent  the  farmer  has  participated in the project as of  March
    1976.  It is measured by an index of 2 questions  designed  to  measure
    the  farmer's perception of how much he had participated in the project
    since its inception.

     These variables, along with their means and standard  deviations,  are
presented  in  Table  75.  They are presented as they fit the stages of the
Black Creek Model in Figure 20.
                                                    STUDY RESULTS

-------
   RECEIVER VARIABLES
  1.  PERSONAL
        EDUCATION
        PERCEIVED NEED
  2.  SOCIAL
        SES
        OFF-FARM EMPLOYMENT
        LEADERSHIP SCORE
SOCIAL SYSTEM VARIABLES
           AMISH/NON-AMISH
                                       KNOWLEDGE
                                         OFBCP
PERSUASION
TOWARD BCP
                            Figure  20. Black Creek Scciological Model
PARTICIPATION
   IN BCP
                                       CO
                                       EH
                                       i-q
                                       D
                                       W
                                       W
                                                                                                         CO

-------
                                                                  165
                                  TABLE 75
                        Sociological Model Variables

Variable
XI Education of the farmer
X2 Socio-economic status
X3 Perceived need for innovation
X4 Off-farm employment
X5 Leadership score
X6 Amish or Non-Amish
X7 Advice from leader
X8 Agency contact
X9 Knowledge of the project
X10 Persuation toward the project
Xll Participation in the project

Mean
9.573
20275.281
27.225
77.494
2.528
1.640
1.337
6.006
2.989
14.584
8.325
Standard
Deviation
3.285
12411.972
5.011
104.067
6.455
.483
.475
7.969
.805
6.210
3.254
4.8.2 Model:  Economic

     A linear programming model was formulated to create a  static  equili-
brium cropping plan.  The model maximizes profit by selecting the most pro-
fitable combinations of crops and tillage practices  while  complying  with
resource constraints.  Proper timing of operations and resource availabili-
ty was specified in the land preparation, planting, and  harvesting  phases
of  production  for  each tillage practice.  The four primary tillage prac-
tices were moldboard plow, chisel  plow,  double  disking,  and  no-tillage
preparation   (see  Table  76).  The importance of timeliness in modern crop
production is built into the model by adjusting  yields  to  correspond  to
planting and harvest dates.  In addition, cropping operations are specified
to insure proper sequence.
                                  TABLE 76
                         Primary Tillage Practices
Operation

Moldboard plow
Chisel
Disk or Field Cultivate
Disk
Plant
No-till Plant
Tillage   Tillage   Tillage   Tillage
Practice  Practice  Practice  Practice
   1234
   X

   X

   X
X
X
X
X
X
                                                           X
     The analysis was conducted on four sets  of  data.   These  data  sets
correspond with:  (1) a 580 acre farm with less than an average two percent
land slope, (2)  a 370 acre farm with less than  average  two  percent  land
slope,  (3)  a  580 acre farm with greater than an average two percent land
                                                     STUDY  RESULTS

-------
 166

slope, and (4)  a 370 acre farm with greater than  an  average  two  percent
land slope.

     The model solutions for each data set were examined at several  levels
of  soil loss which constrained the productive activities below levels per-
mitted in the optimal unconstrained solution.  The results of the  modeling
process  were  evaluated at selected prices for the crop output.  For exam-
ple, the model solutions were compared for wheat prices at both  $3.20  per
bushel and $2.46 per bushel.  The results were further evaluated for policy
alternatives which either eliminated fall tillage or prohibited the use  of
the moldboard plow.

     The analysis was performed first for the individual farm data sets  to
examine  the change in the crop management practices and subsequent changes
in net returns to labor and management.  From these results, costs of  each
policy  alternative  were aggregated to represent modern crop management in
the Black Creek Watershed.

     The land, labor, and machinery resources of the two hypothetical farms
used in this study were based on representative findings obtained in a sur-
vey of modern operations in the Black Creek Watershed.  Model  coefficients
pertaining  to labor, machinery, and time resources used in crop production
were calculated according to procedures outlined in publications pertaining
 to  crop budgeting  (Brink et al.  1976, Doster et al.  1976).  These calcu-
 lations used labor and machinery information taken from  a  survey  of  the
watershed  and  secondary  data  pertaining  to  rates  of land, labor, and
machinery  use  (Doster e_t al.  1976).  Product prices  and  production  cost
 estimates  also came from secondary sources  (Agricultural Prices, 1974).

     Estimates of  soil losses from agricultural cropland in the Black Creek
 Watershed  were  derived  from  the Universal Soil Loss Equation  (Ohio CES,
 1975).  Crop management and yield information for  these  calculations  was
 obtained   from  both  agricultural  data  collected   in  the   survey of the
 watershed  and the  secondary information concerning soil characteristics and
 crop production.   Yield differences associated with different  tillage prac-
 tices were based on previous  studies  (Mannering et al.  1976,  Griffith   et
 al.   1973).  Similarly, secondary information showed  that different tillage
 practices  cause different amounts of  soil  loss   (Mannering  et al.    1976,
 Griffith  et al.  1973).
 4.8.3 The Data Base

      Computer coefficients which specify the resource requirements per acre
 are  given  in Table 77 and Table 78.   A descriptive sample of the calcula-
 tions used to derive these coefficients and a reprint of the field and  la-
 bor  time requirements chart from the Purdue Crop Budget Model B-93 (Doster
 et al.  1976) are given in Appendix B.  Field rates from  this  chart  were
 used~to insure consistency among field and labor time requirements.

      Coefficients that specify wage rates are based on figures used in  the
 1976  Purdue  Crop Budget Model B-93 and were $4.00 an hour for labor hired
 in and $2.00 an hour for labor hired out of the operator's own crop activi-
 ties.  Part-time labor is assumed to be only 80 percent as efficient as the


  STUDY  RESULTS

-------
                                                   TABLE  77

                                     Computer  Coefficients - 370 Acre Farm
„ ^ahor Tractor Harvest Field
Requirements Field Prep- Field Prep- Field Plant- Tield Hours
(Man per field aration Hours aration Hours ing Hours Hours Available
hours/acre/ per Acre- per Acre- per per ' per
	 — 	 !i£iLL> 	 fell 	 Spring 	 Acre Ac,e Arwi
Corn Preparation
Till a
Till 92
Till ,"3
Com Production
Till PI
Till 22
Till j?3
Soybean Preparation
Till SS\
Till 12
Till S3
Till 34
Soybean Production
Till f'l
Till 02
Till C3
Till (74
Wheat Production
Till (71
Till i'2
Till ?3
Till 54

.6486 .3093
.5097 .2062
.4516

1.1312
1.1812
1.1C12

-.4507 .3093
.3477 .2062
.2856


.9494
.9494
.9494
.9023

1.2579 .3093
1.1549 .2063
1.0963 .1667
.7912 .1586

.1833 .6521
.1833 5221
.1833 .4673
Plant Cult.
.1993 .1993 .1325
.1993 .1993 .1325
.1993 .1993 .1325
Harvest - .3333
•1333 .uis
•1233 .3303
.1833 .2840

PJnnt Cult.
.1993 .1993 .1325
.1993 .1993 .1325
.1993 .1993 .1325
.1586 .1586 .1325
Harvest - .3333
.6180
.5150
.4507
.5536





.3545
.3545
.3545






.2146
.2146
.2146
.2146

.4000
.4000
.4000
.4000
D
K
en
G
cn

-------
                                                                                                                          00
                                                   TABLE 78

                                   Computer Coefficients -  580 Acre Farm
Labor
Requirements Field Prep-
(Ilan per field aratior. Hours
hour/acres/ per Acre-
hour) 	 Fall 	
Corn Preparation
Till Si
Till 1?2
Till 63

Corn Production
Till Si
Till 12
Till 03

Soybean Preparation
Till £1
Till ?2
Till 03
Till #4

Soybean Production
Till i'l
Till £2
Till #3
Till 04

Wheac Production
Till 9i
Till i?2
Till £3
Till l?4 	 	
.5452 .1415
.4638 .1031
.3307

1.1312
1.1SI2
1.1812

13332 .1415
.3037 .1031
.2037


.9494
.9494
.9494
.9023

1.2216 .1415
1.1140 .1031
1.0259 -1072
7^12 .1536
Field Prep- Field Plant- Field
aration Hours ing Hours Hours
per Acre- per per
Srrin" Acre Acre
.1500
.1500
.1500
Plant
.1057 .1057
.1057 .1057
.1057 .1057
Harvest
.1500
.1500
.1500

Plnnt
.1057 .1057
.1057 .1057
.1057 .1057
.1536 .1556
Harvest



.5035
.4487
.1057
Cult.
.1325
.1325
.1325
- .3333
.3535
.3388
.1997

Cult.
.1325
.1325
.1325
.1325
- .3333
.4722
.4653
.3653
.5586

Hours
»v»i1»>h:e
par
Acre




.3545
.3545
.3545






.2146
.2146
.2146
.2146

.4000
.4000
' A^r*
• *+ v ^J v
.4000

a
tr1
i-3
en

-------
 operator's or full time labor.
                                                                        169
      Based on Information contained in Farm Planning and Financial  Manage-
 ment  (USD&,  1975),  machine operation direct cost per acre is assumed to be
 $18.00 for corn,   $8.75  for  soybeans,  and  $6.25  for  wheat.    Indirect
 machinery  and equipment costs  per acre are assumed to be $24 for corn, $20
 for  soybeans, and  $10 for wheat.   Indirect  machinery  costs  are  deducted
 from  the objective  function value only after the basis has been  determined
 and  are used  in calculating returns to labor and  management.

      Based on a land capability analysis of the Black Creek Study  Area  as
 given in Table A-3 of the Environmental Impact of Land Use on Water Quality
 (A Work Plan), two slope categories for the  watershed  can  be  developed.
 The   first category  includes all  the land capability units with land slopes
 less than two percent.   Of the  12,038 acres in the watershed,  6,293  defin-
 itely fit this class.   The other  more erosive category, land capability un-
 its  with slopes greater than two  percent, includes 2,047 acres.   The II W-2
 land  capability unit is characterized by land with slopes from zero to two
 percent as well as land with slopes from two to six percent.   The types  of
 soils  in  the watershed  characterized  by  these two ranges in slope are
 equally divided.   Thus, the 3,698 acres in the II W-2 capability  group were
 assumed  to  be equally  divided  between  the two slope categories.   This
 resulted in 8,142  total acres,  or 68 percent of the watershed  acres,  being
 categorized  as less than a two  percent slope.   The remaining 3,896 acres,
 or 32 percent of the watershed, are assumed to have slopes greater than two
 percent.

      For the  purposes of this study,  an estimated 7,500 acres   of  cropland
 are   characterized   by   modern  management  practices.   The estimated 5,100
 acres with land slopes  less than  two percent are  assumed to have  a  univer-
 sal   soil  loss equation length slope (SL)  factor of .128.   The 2,400 acres
 with greater  than  two percent slopes are assigned an SL factor of .6.    The
 importance of land  slope to this study becomes apparent from  the following
 discussion of the  universal soil  loss equation.

      Soil  loss coefficients  are  derived  from  calculations  based   on
 Wischmeier and Smith's  Universal  Soil  Loss Equation (Wischmeier et al.
 1972).                                                                	

      Table 79 shows   the  average  annual  soil  loss  coefficients  that
 correspond to the  various tillage practices, crop rotations,  crop manage-
 ment factors,  and  two length-slope (LS)  factors that  are  associated   with
 the   given soil type.   Soil losses were specified to correspond with common
 three year combinations of crop rotations and  tillage practices.

      Corn yields are assumed to average 118 bushels,   soybeans average  42
 bushels   and   wheat  averages 52 bushels.   Variations in yields and moisture
 correspond to  different planting  and  harvesting dates.   Table   80  presents
 these variations.

      Corn yields are reduced  for delays  in planting   at  1   bushel/acre/day
 from  May  10 to  May 23,  and  2  bushels/acre/day  from May 24  to June 6 (Doster
 et al.   1972).  A two percent harvest  field  loss   is   assumed  between  the
 first  and  second  harvest periods and  a  three to six  percent loss between
 the last  two periods.   Similar yield penalties exist  for  soybeans.   In  ad-
dition  to  planting  and harvesting dates, corn  and  soybean yields are  af-
 fected by  tillage practices.

     Corn yield variations for soil types  similar to  those located  in  Black


                                                           STUDY  RESULTS

-------
 170
                                 TABLE 79
                   Average Annual Soil Loss Coefficient
Three-Year ,
f\ r\
3asc Combination '

CTP1-CTP1-SBTP1
CTP2-CTP2-SBTP2
CTP1-SBTP1-SBTP1
CTP2-CTP2-SBTP2
CTP1-CTP1-SBTP3
CTP1-SBTP1-WTP1
CTP2-SBTP2-WTP2
CTP1-SBTP3-WTP3
CTP1-CTP1-SBTPI
CTP2-CTP2-SBTP2
CTP1-CTP1-SBTP3
CTP1-SBTP1-SBTP1
CTP2-SBTP2-SBTP2
CTP1-SBTP3-SBTP1
CTP1-SBTP4-S3TP1
CTP1-WTP1-SBTP1
CTP2-WTP2-SBTP2
CTP1-WTP3-SBTP3
SBTP1-SBTP1-WTP4
CTP1-CTP1-WTP1
CTP2-CTP2-WTP2
CTP1-CTP1-WTP3
CTP1-SBTP1-WTP1
CTP2-SBTP2-WTP2
SBTP1-SBTP3-WTP1
SBTP1-SBTP4-WTP1
SBTP1-WTP1-VTPI
SBTP2-WTP2-WTP2
SBTP3-WTP3-WTP1
SBTP3-WTP4-WTP1
Crop
Management
Factor (C)

.3519
.1720
.1362
.1720
.2368
.3000
.1320
.1501
.3519
.1720
.2368
.4362
.1694
.3204
.3204
.3000
.1320
.1501
.1549
.2227
.0952
.2328
.3000
.1320
.1549
.1549
.2234
.0847
.0847
.0847
Three Year
Average Annual
Soil Loss (Tons/Acre)
LS = .128
2.365
1.155
2.931
1.155
1.591
2.017
.887
1.008
2.365
1.155
1.591
2.931
1.125
2.153
2.153
2.016
.887
1.008
1.041
1.497
.640
1.564
2.017
.887
1,041
1.041
1.515
.555
.555
.555
LS — .6
11.086
5.414
13.739
5.414
7.459
9.450
4.159
4.725
11.086
5.414
7.458
13.739
5.273
10.092
10.092
9.450
A. 159
4.725
4.880
7.017
3.000
7.331
9.450
4.159
4.880
4.880
7.102
2.602
2.602
2.602
      C » Corn
     SB = Soybeans
      W «= Wheat

     TP1 " Tillage Practice 1
     TP2 = Tillage Practice 2
     TP3 = Tillage Practice 3
     TP4 •= Tillage Practice 4

     Refer to Table 3.1 for explanation.
STUDY RESULTS

-------
                                                       TABLE  80

                                     Average Corn Yield and Moisture Coefficients
Harvest
Period


Sept 27
to
Oct 17


Oct. 18
to
Nov. 7



Nov. 8
to
Nov. 28


Tillage-
Planting
Treatment
TP1

TP2

TP3

TP1

TP2

TP3

TP1

TP2

TP3

Planting Period
Production item
Corn Yield
Moisture Points9
Corn Yield
Moisture Points3
Corn Yield
Moisture Points3
Corn Yield
Moisture Points3
Corn Yield
Moisture Points
Corn Yield
Moisture Points
Corn Yield
Moisture Points3
Corn Yield
Moisture Points
Corn Yield
Moisture Points
April 26
to
May 2
321
1210
109
1090
108
1080
119
595
107
535
106
530
117
468
105
420
104
416
May 3
to
May 9
121
1452
109
1308
108
1298
119
838
107
749
106
742
117
585
105
525
104
520
May 10
to
May 16
114
1596
102
1428
101
1414
112
1008
100
900
99
891
110
668
98
588
97
582
May 17
to
Mav 23






105
1260
94
1128
94
1128
103
824
92
736
92
736
May 24
to
Mav 30






98
1568
88
1A08
90
1440
86
1056
56
946
80
968
tn
C
tr1
1-3
          Moisture points above 14 point base = moisture points above base x bushels/acre.

-------
Creek were estimated based on conversations with Mannering and Griffith.

     Similarly, reductions in soybean yields  are  assumed  to  occur  when
moldboard  preparation  is  replaced.   Adoption  of  chisel or double disc
preparation is assumed to cause a five percent reduction in yield  and  no-
tillage  planting is assumed to cause a 10 percent reduction.  Soybean pro-
duction activities and corresponding yields are also presented in Table 81.
                                  TABLE 81
                           Average Soybean Yield

Harvest
Period

Sept. 13
to
i
Sept. 26
Tillage
Planting
Treatment
TP1
TP2

TP3




Item
Soybean
Soybean

Soybean
Yield
Yield

Yield
May 3
to
May 9
43
41

41
May 10 May 17 May 24 May 31
to to to to
May 16 May 23 May 30 June 6
43
41

41
               TP4     Soybean Yield    39      39

Sept. 27
to
Oct. 17

TP1
TP2

TP3
TP4
Soybean
Soybean

Soybean
Soybean
Yield
Yield

Yield
Yield
41
39

39
37
41
39

39
37
40
38

38
36
38
36

36
34
34
32

32
30
      Elevator drying  costs  for  corn are  taken  from  the  Purdue  Crop  Budget
 B-93   and   are  assumed  to be  $.16 per  every ten moisture points dried down.
 Fertilizer,  insecticide, herbicide, and  credit and  miscellaneous  costs  are
 presented  in Table  82.

      Original product prices  are assumed to be $2.30 per  bushel   of  corn,
 $5.50  per bushel of  soybeans,  and $3.20 per bushel of  wheat.  Based on the
 survey findings, land market  value was assumed to be $1,500 per acre.   In-
 terest  in  land at eight percent per  acre  and an $8.00 change per acre for
 taxes and  land  maintenance  were taken  from Farm   Planning   and   Financial
 Management  (USDA,  1975).  Thus, $128.00 per  acre  is deducted from the ob-
 jective function value  when returns to labor and management are derived.

      The right-hand-side values of the linear  program  specify the  resource
 limit.   the number  of productive acres for any one crop was never allowed
 to exceed  2/3 of the  total  available acreage.  This permitted the use of  a
 three-year crop rotation.   The  right-hand-side value for the  soil loss con-
 straint equalled the  sum of the allowable soil loss per acre  multiplied  by
 the number of acres.
 STUDY RESULTS

-------
                                                                       173
                                  TABLE 82
                              Production Costs
o
Costs per Acre of Production
Item
Fertilizer
Insecticide
Herbicide
Seed Cost
Credit & Miscellaneous
Corn
$44.00
7.00
11.00
11.00
8.00
Soybean
$12.00
0
13.00
8.00
6.00
Wheat
$34.00
0
0
12.00
5.00
   Based on cost figures contained  in Purdue  Crop  Budget Model B-93,  p.
   9-12.
4.8.4 Sociological Conclusions

     The sociological model has several implications  for  government  pro-
jects which attempt to introduce innovations, in terms of understanding the
process of developing participation and adoption  among  farmers,  and  the
role  that  the  project agencies and informal social relationships play in
this process.

     To a large extent, the model  indicates  that  agencies  played  their
principal  role in simply informing farmers about the project.  Fanners who
knew about the project tended to develop a favorable  attitude  toward  it.
This  is  important,  because  it  means that it is not necessary to coerce
farmers to participate in projects of this nature.

     Another important implication of the model is indicated by  the  size-
able  affect  of ETHGRP at all three stages of the process.  The model also
indicates that the Amish  are  more  likely  to  have  a  higher  level  of
knowledge,  greater  favorability,  and  more  participation, than the non-
Amish.  It is recognized that the project and its subsidies provide special
circumstances  for  the  adoption of environmental practices, and there are
several specific considerations worth noting.

     (1) The Amish have a very integrated, effective  communication  system
within  their community, so that if contacts are made with only a few Amish
                                                           STUDY RESULTS

-------
174


fanners, many of them will know about it in a very  short  time.   This  is
very  different  from the situation among the non-Amish, where farmers tend
to know fewer of their neighbors, have less frequent contact with them, and
would be less likely to inform others.

      (2) The Amish might also  have  been  more  likely  to  have  received
knowledge  of  the project early (in 1974) because their land was generally
poorer and had more erosion problems.  Thus,  they  would  have  been  more
likely  to have been contacted by project personnel than non-Amish, who are
situated on better land, have larger farms and higher SES.

      Farmland and its surrounding roads constitute over 590  million  acres
of  land in the United States, of which about 387 million acres are cropped
 (Seneca et al., 1974).  This farmland borders on virtually all major  water
sources.   Given  this  unmense amount of land, it is readily apparent that
agricultural pollution could affect all major waterways in this country.

      The type of effort represented by the Black Creek Project  provides  a
way   for area farmers to become involved  in decision making.  It gives them
an opportunity to discuss agricultural options  open  to  them  with  their
neighbors.  Farmers who share their opinions on certain issues can work to-
gether  to help speed solutions to their problems.

      The project also provides farmers with an opportunity to work together
to help solve a problem of national significance.  By participating in this
project they can make an effective contribution to the reduction of  pollu-
tion,  while  only  slightly  reducing their profits from farming.  This is
particularly true in the present case due to the existence of the subsidies
for those adopting the  innovations.

      Because of this, the outlook for continuation of innovations  by  area
 farmers after  withdrawal  of cost-sharing  is good.  Furthermore, the gen-
erally  favorable reaction reported by the farmers  to  the  project  should
 serve  as  a positive indication that many  farmers are quite willing to ac-
 cept  and use technological  innovations  if they are made available and  their
 benefits  are  carefully explained.  The  high level of participation in the
 project among  the Amish is  a particularly good sign in this respect.

      Although  the long  term effects of   the Black  Creek  Project  on the
 farmer's  attitudes  and  behavior will  not be known for  several years, the
 conclusion that the existence of the project led  to a voluntary alteration
 of  behavior   and attitudes by  farmers  in the area  is  inescapable.  This  is
 consistent with much of the research  using  behavior modification, which has
 found that one way to modify behavior  is  to offer explicit rewards  in  early
 stages, but  that  in many  cases  after  a  sufficient period  of   time   the re-
 wards  for  the modified behavior become implicit, so that the behavior will
 continue even  after  the explicit rewards are no  longer provided.

      It should also  be  noted  that  this  research  can be  used   to  illustrate
 the  major   role which  technological  innovations can play in generating so-
 cial  development  in  rural  areas.   By initiating  community meetings  and en-
 couraging  participation  in decision-making the  existence of  a  project such
 as  the Black Creek Project is  also likely to lead to an increase an indivi-
 duals'  involvement  in the affairs  of the local community.
 STUDY RESULTS

-------
                                                                         175
 4.8.5 Economic Conclusions
      Analysis of the results show that far less than  proportional  amounts
 of  sediment come from the relatively flat, less erosive, crop land.  Based
 on the unconstrained optimal solutions to the hypothetical farms,  only  31
 percent  of  the soil loss from modern crop production came from 68 percent
 of the total acres.   Therefore, primary emphasis of controlling  soil  loss
 should be placed on those acres with steeper slopes where, according to the
 analysis, 69 percent of the watershed's soil loss from modern crop  produc-
 tion came from only 32 percent of the acres.

      At the unconstrained optimal solutions, farmers prepared corn and soy-
 bean  land  in  the  fall with the moldboard plow.  One-third of the acreage
 was put into corn production while two-thirds went into soybeans.   As  the
 soil  loss  constraints on the steeper land slopes became more restrictive,
 tillage practices tended to shift from moldboard preparation to increasing-
 ly greater amounts of chisel preparation (see Table 83).
                                  TABLE 83
            Net Revenue,  Returns;  Slopes Greater  Than Two  Percent
Farm
Size
(Acres)
580
580
580
580
580
370
370
370
370
370
Soil
Loss
Tons/Acre
12. 8a
10
8
6
4
12. 8a
10
8
6
4
Net
Revenue
Per Acre
$177.62
175.55
172.90
170.25
166.34
179.89
177.77
175.12
172.47
166.34
Acres of
Corn
Preparation
Moldboard Chisel
197
0
0
0

123
0
0
0


197
197
197
342

123
123
123
230
Acres of Soybean
Preparation
Moldboard Chisel
383
325 58
185 198
45 338
238
247
208 39
119 128
30 217
0 140
 a  — Soil loss  is unconstrained.
     Results of restricting the use of moldboard plow preparation  indicate
the  same  crop  production  patterns as in the unconstrained optimal solu-
tions.  However, corn and soybean preparation was performed with  a  chisel
plow on all of the 370 acres and most of the 580 acres.  Double disking was
used for some soybean preparation on the 580 acre farm.

     Overall the larger farm seemed to show greater flexibility in  comply-
ing  with  the  policy constraints on fall preparation and the use of mold-
board preparation than the smaller farm.  At least the economic impacts, in
terms  of costs per acre when fall preparation was constrained and cost per
ton of reduced soil lost when moldboard tillage was constrained, were  less
severe  for the larger farm.  A comparison of a soil loss constraint policy
with a crop management constraint policy revealed that the same  amount  of
soil  loss  could  be achieved at a lower economic cost when soil loss con-
                                                             STUDY  RESULTS

-------
176


straints are implemented.   The flexibility to select the  most  appropriate
crop  management combination for a particular farm and sediment problem al-
lows more timely operations and higher revenues.   For example, achieving  a
specified level of soil loss by restricting the use of a moldboard plow has
a higher cost per acre than achieving that level of soil loss without  res-
tricting the use of the moldboard plow.

4.8.6 Policy Implications

     The control of nonpoint agricultural water pollution in  general,  and
soil  losses  in particular, will have a significant impact on crop manage-
ment.  According to this study, sediment reduction can more efficiently  be
achieved  by  policies  that constrain soil loss than by policies that_con-
strain crop management practices.  However, the application  of  a  uniform
soil  loss  constraint  policy would more severely affect operators on more
erosive land.  Since these soils are generally less productive anyway,  the
disparity  between  these  and  better, less erosive land would only be in-
creased.  Consequently, operators on the more erosive, steeper sloping land
would  likely  suffer  greater  economic  impacts  from  (1) changes in crop
management that cause reduced yields or less profitable crop rotations, and
 (2) a further decline in relative land values.

     The exclusive reliance on crop management practices to meet  the  more
restrictive  soil  loss  constraints  would  have  negative economic conse-
quences.  Other methods of control, such as structural remedies, jl.e.  ter-
races,  holding  ponds, and field borders, should be assessed to supplement
changes  in  crop  management.   However,  even  with  alternative  control
methods,  soil  loss reduction on more erosive land would have to be subsi-
dized for these operations to remain at a  competitive  profit  level  with
larger farms on flat land.


                                 References
 1.    Agricultural Prices,  November  30,  1976, p.4.

 2.   Allen County Soil and  Water  Conservation District,  Environmental  Impact
 of   Land  Use  on  Water  Quality  (A Work Plan)  —  Black Creek  Study Area,
 ApriT7~1973.

 3.   Brink, Lars, Bruce McCarl and D.  Howard Doster,, Methods and Procedures
 in   the  Purdue  Crop Budget (Model B-9):  An Administrator's Guide, Station
 Bulletin No.  121, Department of  Agricultural Economics, Agricultural  Exper-
 iment Station, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana,  March, 1976.

 4.   Doster, Howard and Bruce McCarl, Purdue Crop Budget Model B-93_ Depart-
 ment of Agricultural Economics,  Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana,
 1976.

 5.   Griffith, D.R., J.V. Mannering, and Richey,   "Energy  Requirements  and
 Areas  of  Adaptation  in  Eight  Tillage-Planting Systems for Corn," paper
 presented to the Engineering and  Agriculture  Conference  on  Energy,  St.
 Louis, Missouri, 1976.
  STUDY RESULTS

-------
                                                                        177
 6.  Mannering, J.V., C.B. Johnson, and R.Z. Wheaton,  "Conservation  Tillage
 —  Effects  on Crop Production and Sediment Yield,"  Paper presented  to  the
 American  Society of Agricultural  Engineers,  Chicago,   Illinois,  December
 14-17,  1976.

 7.  Ohio  Cooperative Extension Service, Ohio Erosion  Control  and  Sediment
 Pollution Abatement Guide Bulletin 594, Columbus, Ohio,  1975.

 8.  Seneca, Joseph J. and  Michael  K.  Tanssig,  Environmental  Economics,
 Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey,  1974.

 9.  U.S.  Department of Agriculture, Farm Planning and Financial Management,
 Cooperative  Extension Service, Purdue University, West  Lafayette, Indiana,
 Revised 1975.

 10.  Wischmeier, Walter H. and Dwight D. Smith, Predicting Rainfall Erosion
 Losses  from Cropland East of the Rocky Mountains, U.S.  Department of Agri-
 culture,  Agriculture Handbook No. 282, Washington, D.C., 1972 reprint.

 4.9 MODELING

 4.9.1 ANSWERS

     Planning is a process of evaluating  the  relative  effectiveness  and
 costs   of alternative  courses  of action designed to attain stated goals.
 One of  the most effective methodologies appropriate for  planning  non-point
 source  pollution  control  programs is known as simulation.  This approach
 utilizes  a mathematical model of the system under consideration to evaluate
 the consequences of alternative control strategies.

     The  validity  of  pollution  control  programs  developed  using  the
 simulation  approach is entirely dependent upon the accuracy with which the
 model can predict  the  effectiveness  of  the  control  strategies  being
 considered.   Therefore,  a  model  capable of accurately simulating a wide
 range of  alternatives is essential if this approach to planning  is  to  be
 successful.    One  major  effort  of  the  Black  Creek  Project  was  the
 development of a comprehensive model designed to characterize the  behavior
 of  natural  watersheds  during  storm events and to  evaluate the impact of
 alternative land use practices on water quality.

     In   selecting  a  structure  for  an  agricultural  non-point   source
 pollution model,  the pollution control planning process was characterized
 as a two-stage effort.  The first step, as evidenced  by the current efforts
 in  208  planning  agencies, was considered to be an  assessment phase.  The
 budgetary and time constraints and the magnitude of the task precluded  any
 other  approach.   This  assessment  phase  is a process of determining the
 relative magnitude of the pollution problems and  identifying  the  primary
 geographic  regions  requiring  urgent  attention,  i.e.   one  of  setting
 priorities.

     The second stage of non-point source planning can  be  defined  as  an
 implementation  phase.   During  this  phase,   planning  decisions  will be
 required concerning expenditures of funds to achieve effective  treatments.
This  involves  the application of specific treatments to individual,  small
 land units.  In order to be economically viable and politically acceptable,
these   planning   decisions  must  be  accurate  and  applied  with  great

                                                         STUDY RESULTS

-------
 178

selectivity to only those areas which will yield  significant  improvements
in water quality.

     With these  considerations  in  mind,  project  personnel  decided  to
develop a model designed to be of general usefulness to the second phase of
208 planning.  The result was a distributed parameter model called ANSWERS,
Areal Non-point Source Watershed Environment Response Simulation.

     A distributed parameter watershed model is one which incorporates  the
influences  of  the  spatial  variation  of  controlling  parameters,  e^.g_.
topography, soil types, vegetation, etc.,  in  a  manner  internal  to  its
computational  algorithms.   In contrast, the more commonly employed lumped
model approach is one which incorporates, to whatever degree they  are  not
ignored, these effects by an a priori analysis on a case by case basis.  In
other words, the lumped approach uses some type of averaging  technique  to
generate  an "effective" coefficient(s) for characterizing the influence of
specific non-uniform distributions of each  parameter.   The  influence  of
this distribution is then represented by the "lumped" coefficients, and the
resulting model is treated as a mathematical transformation of  input  into
output, ^i.e., a "black box," for the subsequent simulation.

     A primary  advantage  of  a  distributed  parameter  analysis  is  its
potential  for  providing  a  more accurate simulation of natural catchment
behavior.  The term potential is used because increased accuracy is  by  no
means  a  direct consequence of using a distributed analysis; rather, it is
realized only if the model is designed to take advantage  of  removing  the
constraints imposed by lumped parameters.

     Lumped models almost invariably  employ  some  weighting  function  to
account  for  the spatial variability of watershed parameters, such as soil
type, cover and slope steepness.  Such weighting functions,  regardless  of
how elaborate, are applied to the catchment prior to modelling runoff. Tnis
constrains the parameter values to be  independent  of  the  magnitude  and
temporal  distribution of the storm event.  Such a constraint is valid only
for linear systems.  Thus, the assumptions and limitations of behaving,  at
least  to  some  degree,  as  a  linear system are subtly imposed on lumped
models.

     Another linear system assumption  implicit  to  almost  all  weighting
functions  used  with  lumped models results from ignoring the influence of
geographic placement of spatially  varying  factors  within  the  catchment
boundaries.  The magnitude of error associated with such approximations has
been demonstrated by Huggins, et al.  (1973).

     A second major advantage  of  a   distributed  model   is  its   inherent
ability  to  simultaneously  model  conditions  at  all  points  within the
watershed.  Tnis readily permits the simulation of  processes  that change
both  spatially  and temporally throughout the catchment.  The accuracy with
which interacting processes can  be  modelled   is  thereby   increased.   In
addition,  a  great  deal  more  information about the  simulated process is
available  to planners.

     Finally,  distributed  models  greatly  facilitate  incorporation  of
relationships  developed   from   small  scale   "plot-size"  studies  to  yield
predictions on a watershed  scale.  It  is much  easier   to   formulate the
individual processes  being modelled as  independent equations applicable at


STUDY  RESULTS

-------
                                                                        179
a point, letting  the  subsequent  model  integration  process  incorporate
effects  of  spatial and temporal variability, than to develop an elaborate
weighting function for each process.  This approach also directly  accounts
for process interactions that would otherwise be ignored or require complex
modifications of weighting functions.

     The development of a comprehensive watershed model such as ANSWERS can
be  subdivided  into  a  number  of  steps or phases.  A useful subdivision
consists of three stages to model building:  conceptualization,  definition
of  quantitative  (mathematical) component relationships, and verification.
Model  concepts  determine  what  is  required  in  the  way  of  component
relationships  and  define  the ultimate accuracy limits of the model.  The
process of developing component relationships for  the  various  parameters
included  in  a  model  is generally an iterative one.  In other words, the
verification  process  is  used  to  modify  and   refine   the   component
relationships of the model.  Ultimately, the accuracy and generality of the
resulting model are limited by the  adequacy  of  model  concepts  and  the
availability  of  field  data  to  validate various component relationships
incorporated into the model.

     Initial concepts of  a  distributed  parameter  watershed  model  were
reported  by  Huggins and Monke (1966) and by Huggins, et al. (1973).  That
work was restricted to predicting runoff hydrographs, although  the  unique
applicability of the approach as a framework for non-point source pollution
models was noted, Huggins, Podmore and Hood (1976).  Beasley (1977) greatly
expanded  this  basic  hydrologic model to incorporate tile inflow, channel
flow routing and the most important aspect of  non-point  source  pollution
from  cropland,  soil  erosion.   Henceforth it became known as the ANSWERS
model.  Beasley utilized the GASP simulation language,  with  its  inherent
implicit  solution  algorithms, to code the original version of the ANSWERS
model.  Dr. J. R. Burney developed a much improved method of  incorporating
channel  flow  effects,  included  the  ability  to  study spatially and/or
temporally variable rainfall and refined the infiltration and soil  erosion
relationships  used  in the model.  He also recoded the model using FORTRAN
in order to obtain a major reduction  in  the  amount  of  computer  memory
required  and  some  improvement  in  execution speed.  This version of the
model employs an explicit integration algorithm.  The detailed structure of
the  ANSWERS  model,  developed under the Black Creek Project, is presented
below.

4.9.1.1 MODEL CONCEPTS

     ANSWERS is a deterministic model based upon the fundamental hypotheses
that:
     "At every point within a catchment a  functional  relationship  exists
     between  the  rate  of  surface runoff and those hydrologic parameters
     which  influence  runoff,  e.g.,  rainfall  intensity,   infiltration,
     topography,  soil  type, etc.  Furthermore, these surface runoff rates
     can  be   utilized   in   conjunction   with   appropriate   component
     relationships  as  the  basis  for  modelling  other transport-related
     phenomenon such as soil erosion  and  chemical  movement  within  that
     watershed."
An important feature of the above hypothesis  is  its  applicability  on  a
"point"  basis.   In order to apply this approach on a practical scale, the
point concept is relaxed to refer instead to  a  watershed  "element".   An
element   is  defined  to  be  an  area  within  which  all  hydrologically


                                                        STUDY  RESULTS

-------
180

 significant parameters are uniform.   Of course,  this process of going  from
 a  point  to  an  elemental  area could be extended indefinitely until one
 assumed the  entire  watershed  was   composed of  a  single  element  with
 "averaged"  parameter  values,  i.e., a lumped model.  The actual geometric
 size of an element is not critical because there is  no  finite-sized  area
 within  which  some  degree of variation in one  or  more parameters does not
 exist.  The crucial concept is that  an element must be  sufficiently  small
 that  arbitrary  changes  of  parameter  values  for a single element have a
 negligible influence upon the response of the entire catchment.

      A watershed to be modelled is assumed  to  be   composed  of  elements,
 square   in  shape  for  computational  convenience,  with  all  hydrologic
 parameters being uniform within each element.  Parameter values are allowed
 to  vary  in  an  unrestricted manner between elements; thus, any degree of
 spatial variability within the watershed is easily  represented.  Individual
 elements  collectively  act  as  a  composite  system  because  of supplied
 topographic data for each element delineating flow  directions in  a  manner
 consistent  with  the  topography of the watershed  being modelled.  Element
 interaction occurs because surface flow (overland  and  channel),  flow  in
 tile  lines  and  groundwater  flow from each element becomes inflow to its
 adjacent elements.  In all other respects, the elements are  hydrologically
 independent.

      Mathematically, individual elemental responses  are  combined  into  a
 watershed system response by integration of the continuity equation:


                              1  - °  •  af                                  <"


               where:
               I =  inflow rate to an  element  from   rainfall  and  adjacent
               elements,
               Q =  outflow  rate,
               S =  volume of water stored  in an element,
               t =  time.

 This  equation may  be solved when it  is   combined  with  a   stage-discharge
 relationship, e_.g_.  Manning's equation.

       For  the watershed model  to  be complete,  it  is necessary to incorporate
 component  relationships   for   the  remaining   hydrologically  significant
 processes which  influence  runoff and   any  related  pollutants.   Specific
 forms  of   relationships  included  have  no   effect whatsoever   on  the
 integration  algorithm    or   distributed   model   concepts.     However,
 relationships  chosen  have a marked  impact upon  the  accuracy with which the
 model  can  characterize   real    watershed   behavior.    The   significant
 consequence is   that   to  substitute one  component  relationship for  another
 when   subsequent  research  on   component   processes   develops   improved
 relationships  is a relatively trivial  task.

       Hydrologic  processes for  which  quantifying   component  relationships
 must   be  developed  are   shown qualitatively in Figure 21.   After  rainfall
 begins, some is  intercepted by  the vegetal cover until  such  time   as  the
  interception   storage  potential is met.   When the  rainfall  rate exceeds the
  interception   rate,  infiltration  into  the soil   begins.    Since   the


 STUDY  RESULTS

-------
                                                                        181

infiltration  rate  decreases  in  an  exponential manner as the soil water
storage increases, a point may be reached when the  rainfall  rate  exceeds
the  combined infiltration and interception rates.  When this occurs, water
begins to stand on the surface in micro-depressions.

     Once surface retention exceeds the capacity of the  micro-depressions,
runoff  begins.   Water  accumulated  in  order  to produce flow across the
surface is surface detention.  Subsurface drainage begins when the pressure
potential  of  the groundwater surrounding a tile drain exceeds atmospheric
potential.  A steady-state infiltration rate may be reached if the duration
and intensity of the rainfall event are sufficiently large.

     When  rainfall  ceases,  the  surface  detention  storage  begins   to
dissipate  until  surface  runoff ceases altogether.  However, infiltration
continues until depressional water  is  no  longer  available.   Subsurface
drainage  continues  as  long as there is excess soil water surrounding the
drains.  The long recession curve on the  outflow  hydrograph,  typical  of
tile drained areas, is then produced.

     Soil detachment, transport, and deposition are very closely related to
concurrent  hydrologic  processes in a watershed.  Detachment and transport
can both be accomplished  by  either  raindrop  impact  or  overland  flow.
Detachment  by rainfall occurs throughout a storm even though overland flow
may not occur.  Thus, most of the soil particles  detached  prior  to  flow
initiation  are  deposited  and  to some extent, reattached.  Detachment of
soil particles by overland flow occurs when the shear stress at the surface
is  sufficient  to  overcome  the  gravitational and cohesive forces of the
particles.  Whether or not a detached soil particle moves, however, depends
upon the sediment load in the flow and its capacity for sediment transport.

     The transport of chemical pollutants irom a land area is  also  highly
related  to  the  hydrologic  behavior  of  a  catchment  and,  for certain
chemicals such as phosphorus and cadmium, the  soil  erosion  that  occurs.
These  processes  can  readily  be incorporated into a distributed model by
developing component relationships for individual elements.

     Natural rainfall events do not exhibit the steady appearance shown  in
Figure  21.   Furthermore,  uniformity  of  coverage  over a watershed will
usually vary during an event.  In addition, hydrologic responses of various
areas within a watershed may vary greatly.  Hence, the resultant hydrograph
for the entire watershed will contain at least some of the effects  of  all
of  these  highly  complex,  unsteady, non-uniform interactions.  For these
reasons, a distributed model must be designed and utilized as  a  means  of
describing and quantifying these processes.

     Every  hydrologic  or  erosion  component  of  the  ANSWERS  model  is
expressed as a rate.  Thus, infiltration and interception rates can both be
subtracted from the rainfall rate to provide the excess rainfall rate  used
in  satisfying surface retention and detention.  The difference between the
inflow and outflow rates is integrated to provide a volume.   When  divided
by  the  elemental  area,  this  yields  the average depth of water over an
element.  Tne depth, in turn, is used  to  determine  an  outflow  rate  by
applying a runoff function that accounts for both runoff and detention.

     The thrust of the project's modelling effort was the development of  a
new  approach  that  could  be used as a planning tool.  Father than devote
                                                              STUDY RESULTS

-------
  182
UJ
o:
ct
UJ
Q_

LU
h-
<
o:
     _  '  Figure 21. Surface and Subsurface Water Movement Relationships
  large amounts of  time  and  money  toward  basic  research  on  hydrologic
  component  relationships,  the  focus was on integrating existing, accepted
  STUDY RESULTS

-------
                                                                        183


 relationships into a  simulation 'structure  that  had  a  high  degree  of
 versatility and reliability.

      The specific component relationships selected for the current  version
 of  the  ANSWERS  model   are   outlined  below.    All   were selected  so that
 modularity  was  preserved.    Modification  or   replacement  of   component
 relationships   such  as  infiltration  or  erosion  does  not  affect  the
 computational  algorithms  of  other   components.   In  other  words,    the
 component  relationships  are sufficiently independent from each other that
 user-supplied subroutines may easily  be  substituted  for  those  originally
 used  in  the  ANSWERS  model.   This  framework also permits users to append
 additional component relationships  to simulate other  processes important to
 specific applications.

 4.9.1.2 COMPONENT RELATIONSHIPS

 4.9.1.2.1 Flow Characterization

     Within its topographic   boundary,   a   catchment   is  divided  into   an
 irregular  matrix  of  square  elements, as  shown  in  Figure  22.   Each  element
 acts as an overland  flow plane  having   a   fixed  slope  and  direction   of
 steepest  descent.   Channel  flow  is   analyzed  by  a separate pattern  of
 channel   elements   (referred  to  hereafter  as  channel  segments) ,  which
 underlie  the   grid of overland flow elements.  Elements designated  to have
 channel  flow may,  therefore, be viewed as dual elements. These elements act
 as   ordinary  overland   flow elements, with the exception that all overland
 flow out of that element goes into its "shadow" channel segment.  Flow  out
 of   a  channel  segment goes  into the next downslope channel segment.  This
 downslope channel  segment will also receive flow  from  any  other  channel
 segments which  flow into it and from its own overland flow element.

     Overland   and  tile  outflow  from  an  element  is  assumed   to   be
 proportioned as separate surface and tile line inflow into adjacent row and
 column elements according to the direction of the  slope  of  the  element.
 The  slope direction is designated on input as the angular degrees counter-
 clockwise  from the positive horizontal (row) axis.  For the  example  shown
 in  Figure  23 below, slope direction is in the fourth quadrant.  The slope
direction angle equals 270 degrees plus angle "a".

     The fraction of outflow going into the adjacent row element, RFL,  is:

                       |a)_               if. a ± 450f  and
            RFL = tana)_
            RPT  - i    tan(90-a)       .       o           o
            Ri-L  - 1  -  - - -      !f:  45^ <  a <  go"


with the remaining outflow going into the adjacent column  element.   Since
everything,  including  surface  slope,  within an element is assumed to be
constant, this method  of  partitioning  overland  flow  seems  intuitively
obvious.   Such  is  not  the  case for tile flow.  In general, records are
seldom available which delineate the  layout  of  tile  systems.   However,
limitations  on  feasible  installation  depths mean that tile slopes must
with only temporary deviations, follow the general topography.   Therefore
the  use  of  an  element's  slope  properties  would  seem  to  be a close
                                                              STUDY RESULTS

-------
184
  Figure 22. Watershed Divided into Element with Channel Elements Shaded
A2  1
                        Al +  A2
                                              Q
                                                     Direction of
                                                     steepest  slope
  Figure 23.  Partitioning of overland flow.
STUDY RESULTS

-------
                                                                           185

 approximation which eliminates the need for additional input information.

      The flow relationship utilized  in  conjunction  with  the  continuity
 equation  to  perform the overland flow routing is Manning's equation.  The
 hydraulic radius is assumed equal to the  average  detention  depth  in  an
 element.   Detention  depth  is  calculated  as the total volume"of surface
 water in an element, minus the retention volume, divided by the area of the
 element.   This  implies  that  the entire specified retention volume of an
 element be filled before any water becomes available for surface runoff.

      Although  the  channel  system  is  unrestricted  in   direction   and
 branching,  it  is  necessary  that  it be continuous and that each element
 contain only one channel segment.  To  achieve  greater  definition  it  is
 necessary  to  assume  a  smaller  element  size  for  all elements, with a
 consequent increase in core storage and execution time.

      As all flow  leaving  the  overland  section  of  a  dual  element  is
 constrained  to  enter  the  channel segment,  the slope direction  of a dual
 element is irrelevant in terms of division of  outflow.   However, the  slope
 direction  is  of vital importance in establishing channel continuity.   All
 outflow from a channel segment enters an adjacent channel  segment  located
 in  one of the eight directions of the cardinal  axes or the diagonals.   The
 specific direction is determined by the slope  direction  assigned  to  the
 dual  element.    This  slope  direction  must  be  within 22 degrees of the
 direction of the intended receiving channel segment,  and  in  view  of  the
 above  it  is recommended that only 45 degree  increments in slope  direction
 be specified for dual elements.

      It is permissible to specify the slope, width and  Manning's   roughness
 coefficient  for  each  channel   segment  independent  of the corresponding
 values for its  overland flow element.    Typically,   rather  than   having  a
 unique  set  of  values  for   each  channel segment, they are grouped  into
 reaches with similar  coefficients.   Manning's  equation  is again used  as the
 flow relationship required,  in conjunction with  the continuity equation,  to
 perform the routing  calculations.

 4.9.1.2.2 Interception

      Interception encompasses  the  total  volume of  water   removed   from   the
 incoming  rainfall  by  raindrop  contact with and  retention by the vegetal
 canopy,  and  by  evaporation during  the  storm event.  The water  retained   by
 the  vegetation,  i.e.,   interception  storage, is  held primarily by surface
 tension   forces.   This  portion   of   the   total   interception is  quickly
 satisfied,   particularly in  more   intense  storms.  Since  a  dense vegetal
 cover  can expose  an   immense   surface  area  to  rainfall,   the  amount   of
moisture   evaporating   from  this  exposed  area  can be considerable, even
during high  humidity conditions of a storm.  However, for  storm intensities
of  primary   interest  from  the  standpoint  of  non-point  pollution  from
cropland,  interception is a  relatively  minor  hydrologic  component.    In
order  to  reduce simulation costs,  interception was assumed to be uniform  in
rate and  total volume over each type of vegetation.

     Horton  (1919) did a great deal of work in the area of  estimating  the
amount  of  and  mechanisms controlling  interception.  He studied the water
intercepted by several species  of  trees  as  well  as  some  economically
important  crops.   Values  of  from  0.5  millimeter to 1.8 millimeters of
interception storage volume were found to exist for  trees  and  nearly  as


                                                              STUDY RESULTS

-------
186
much   for   well   developed  crops.    Horton  recommended  the  following
relationship as a means of describing  the  interception  for   a  particular
event:


                             V =  A(B  + CP)h
              where:
              V = interception volume per unit area — mm,
              P = precipitation — mm,
              h = height of crop — m,
              A, B and C are constants depending on  the  type  of  vegetal
              cover.

The constants referred to above are listed for several crops in  Table  84.
The  B  coefficient is a measure of the interception potential of the crop.
The C coefficient attempts to describe evaporation potential.
                                  TABLE  84
                Interception Constants Recommended by Horton
Crop
Oats
Corn
Grass
Pasture and meadow
Wheat, rye, and barley
Beans, potatoes, and cabbage
A
3.3
h/3
7
3.3
3.3
.8h
B
.18
.13
.13
.13
.13
.5
C
.07
.005
.08
.08
.05
.15
4.9.1.2.3 Retention

     Surface retention is a component that can have a pronounced effect  on
surface  runoff  and drainage characteristics of a watershed.  Rough ground
can store large amounts of water.  Huggins and Monke (1966), using  several
field   surfaces,   developed   a  dimensionally  homogeneous  relationship
describing the surface retention  storage  potential  of  a  surface  as  a
function  of  the  water  depth in the zone of micro-relief.  The resulting
relationship is of the form:


                              s_ =  a/*L.r                                (5)
                              su

              where:
              s  = volume of stored water,
              su = hu times area of element,
              h  = height above datum,
              hu = height of maximum micro-relief,
              A and B are characteristic parameters.
 STUDY RESULTS

-------
                                                                         187


 In order  for  this equation  form  to  yield  a  correct  surface  area  as  h
 approaches  hu  it is necessary that the product of A and B equal 1.  Values
 of hu, A, and B for several field surface conditions, appear in Table 85.


                                  TABLE 85
                    Typical Surface Storage Coefficients
Condition
Plowed Ground
Spring — smooth
Spring — normal
Spring — rough
Fall — smooth
Fall — normal
Fall — rough
Disked and Harrowed
Very smooth
Rather rough
Corn stubble
hu — mm
100
130
130
60
70
130

30
60
110
A
.53
.48
.59
.37
.33
.45

.42
.43
.59
B
1.9
2.1
1.7
2.7
3.0
2.2

2.4
2.3
1.7
4.9.1.2.4 Subsurface Waters

     Currently,  three  subcomponents  of  subsurface  water  movement  are
incorporated  into  the ANSWERS model: infiltration, tile drainage and base
flow.  The effort devoted to modelling each roughly  corresponds  to  their
relative importance in simulating non-point pollution from cropland.  Thus,
infiltration processes are simulated in greater detail than tile flow while
base flow is modelled only crudely.

     Infiltration  can  greatly  affect  the  hydrologic  response   of   a
watershed.   Although  many  years  of  research  have  been  conducted  on
infiltration phenomena, there is still no universally accepted  method  for
describing  infiltration  on  a watershed scale.  The method chosen for the
ANSWERS model was developed by Hoitan (1961)   and  Overton  (1964).   In  a
dimensionally homogeneous form it can be expressed as:


                                     /s  - P\P
                         f  •fc  + A(Sr)                              (6)

                where:
                 f = infiltration rate at a particular time,
                fc = final or  steady state infiltration rate,
                 A = maximum possible infiltration rate,
                 S = storage potential  of  soil   within  the  control   zone
                (total porosity minus antecedent soil moisture),
                 F = total volume of water infiltrated,
                Tp = total porosity within the  "control depth",
                 P  =  diraensionless coefficient  relating   the   rate    of
                decrease in infiltration rate with increasing  soil  moisture
                content.
                                                             STUDY RESULTS

-------
 188
This form uses the soil water content, rather than time, as the independent
variable.   It is computationally advantageous when modelling with rainfall
intensities less than the infiltration capacity and for simulating recovery
due to drainage during brief periods without rainfall.

     During periods of zero rainfall rate  any  infiltration  which  occurs
must  be  supplied  by  the  volume  of water stored as either retention or
detention.  Since the surface of an element is seldom  entirely  inundated,
the  computed  infiltration capacity is reduced in direct proportion to the
percent of the soil surface not submerged.   Tne  area  submerged  for  any
given  volume of water in an element can be computed by differentiating the
relationship developed above to characterize surface retention.

     Hoitan's equation requires six infiltration parameters to be specified
for a given soil type: total porosity, field capacity, depth of the control
zone, steady-state infiltration  rate  (fc),  and  the  two  unsteady-state
coefficients  (A and P).  Data from both large plot-sized simulated rainfall
tests, Skaggs, et al.  (1969)  and  field   rainulator  tests  conducted  in
cooperation  with  USDA-ARS  as a part of the Black Creek Project have been
used to estimate parameter values.   All  of  these  tests  indicated  that
surface   crusting   conditions   have  a  major  impact  on  the  observed
infiltration relationship.  Experience with Holtan's equation has indicated
the  influence  of  crusting can be modelled by adjustment of the specified
depth of  the control zone.   Crusting  requires  the  use  of  a  shallower
control zone.

     According to Holtan's conceptualization of the infiltration process,  a
"control  zone"  depth  of  soil  determines  the  infiltration rate at the
surface.  He defined the depth of this control zone as  the shallower of the
depth to  an impeding soil layer or that required for the hydraulic gradient
to"reach  unity.  Extending this same concept somewhat,  the  ANSWERS  model
maintains an accounting of water that leaves this control zone.

     The  rate of water movement from  the control zone  is a function of  the
moisture  content  of  that  zone.   The two conditions which can exist are
handled  according the  following rules:
        (1) when  the moisture content of the control zone is less than field
       capacity, no water moves from  this  zone,
        (2) when  the control  zone moisture  exceeds  field capacity, the water
       moves-from this zone  according to  the equation:
                                                                            (7)
                    where:
                    Dr  = drainage rate of water from the control zone,
                    Piv = volume  of  water  that  could  still  potentially
                    infiltrate into the control zone,
                    Gwc = gravitational water capacity of the control  zone,
                    i^.e.  total porosity minus field capacity,
                    N ~~ = parameter controlling rate  of  movement,  usually
                    assumed equal to 3.

 This relationship satisfies the continuity requirement that at  saturation,
 STUDY RESULTS

-------
                                                                        189


when  Piv  =  0,  the drainage rate from the control zone equals  the steady
state   infiltration  rate,  fc.   In  addition,   it  exhibits   intuitively
desirable  properties  of  decreasing moisture movement rapidly as  the soil
dries from saturation and of asymptotically  approaching  a  zero  drainage
rate.

     Water leaving the control zone contributes to tile  drainage,  if  the
element is  tiled, or to base flow.  In both cases the water is  assumed to
re-emerge into the channel segments.  Water  moves  from  the  infiltration
control zone into the "pools" available for tile  and/or base flow at a rate
equal to Dr.

     Individual elements  may  selectively  be  designated  as  being  tile
drained.   In  addition  to water coming from the control zone, tile inflow
may be  occurring from adjacent tiled elements.  The sum of these  two  rates
constitutes  the  rate  of  subsurface  inflow into an element.   Subsurface
water moves out the element's tile at this inflow  rate  up  to   a  maximum
outflow rate equal to the tile drainage coefficient.  Whenever the rate of
subsurface inflow to an element  exceeds  its  drainage  coefficient,  that
excess  water is diverted to baseflow storage.  Elements which are not tiled
have a  drainage coefficient of zero.

     Subsurface water entering  an  element  at  rates  in  excess  of  its
drainage  coefficient  is stored in a single "pool".  To simulate base flow
it is released directly into channel segments at a rate proportional to the
volume  of  water in storage.  The proportionality constant, referred to as
the base flow release fraction, is specified in the input data file.  Water
is released at an equal rate to each channel segment.  For small catchments
having  no defined channels, only overland flow will appear at  the  outlet.
Base flow will be non-zero only for watersheds with channel segments.

4.9.1.2.5 Sediment Detachment and Movement

     Soil erosion as it relates to non-point source pollution can be viewed
as  two  separate processes, detachment of particles from the soil mass and
transport of these particles into the streams  and  lakes.   Detachment  of
either primary soil particles or aggregates can result from either rainfall
or flowing water.  These same factors can cause detached  particles  to  be
transported  to  the  water supply network.  Thus, there are four  processes
for which quantifying relationships must be developed.

     The detachment of soil particles  by  water  is  accomplished  by  two
                                                              STUDY RESULTS

-------
190


processes.   The  first involves dislodging soil as a result of the kinetic
energy of rainfall.  Rainfall is the major detachment process on relatively
flat  watersheds.   The second process involves the separation of particles
from the soil mass by shear and lift forces generated by overland flow.

     Detachment of soil particles by raindrop impact  is  calculated  using
the relationship described by Meyer and Wischmeier (1969):
                             DR =  .0270K-Ai-I2                         (8)
              where:
              DR = rainfall impact detachment rate, kg/min,
              C  = cropping and management factor (from Universal Soil Loss
              Equation), Wischmeier and Smith (1965),
              K   =  soil  erosivity  factor  (from  Universal  Soil   Loss
              Equation), T/A/EIunit,
              Ai = area increment, sq m,
              I  = rainfall intensity, mm/min.

     The detachment of soil particles by overland  flow  was  described  by
Meyer and Wischmeier (1969) and modified by Foster (1976)  as follows:
                          DF »  ,018-C-K-Ai-S-Q                         (9)
               where:
               DF = overland flow detachment rate, kg/min,
               S = slope steepness,
               Q = flow rate per unit width, sq m/min.

     Once a soil particle has been  detached,  sufficient  energy  must  be
available to transport it or the particle will be deposited.  The transport
of sediment by overland flow is self-regulating, soil  particle  detachment
by_  overland flow does not occur unless there is excess energy available in
addition to the amount required to transport suspended sediments.  However,
detachment  by rainfall impact often occurs when there is little or no flow
available for transport.

     After a literature  study  which  included  Yalin  (1963),  Meyer  and
Wischmeier  (1969),  Foster and Meyer (1972), and Curtis  (1976), as well as
an inspection of soils data,  a  relationship  for  particle  transport  in
overland flow was chosen as shown in Figure 24.
The two portions of the curve generally represent the laminar and turbulent
flow regions.  Equations and their region of application are:
STUDY RESULTS

-------
                                                                          191
                    K31-
                          LAMINAR FLOW
                          T=I46 S Q-5
            TURBULENT FLOW
            T= 14600 SO2
                    IO
                                   q = rnVmin
          Figure 24. Transport Relationship Used  in ANSWERS Model
          T =  146 (S/Q)
               T =  14600(SQ)
if  Q <  .74 sq  m, and
     if Q >  .74
                                                                            (11)
where:  T = potential transport rate of sediment,  kg/min/m.

Table  86  lists  the  four  particle  sizes  that  were   considered    as
representative in making the transport calculations.


     The erosion portion of the ANSWERS model was  simplified further by  the
following assumptions:
     1.  Subsurface or tile drainage produces no sediment.  (Data  indicate
     around  two  percent  of  the  average  annual loading originated from
     subsurface systems on the Black Creek Watershed).
                                                              STUDY RESULTS

-------
192
                                 TABLE 86
                     Sediment Particle Characteristics
Particle
Group
I
II
III
IV
Mean
Diameter-mm
.01
.05
.15
.30
Specific
Gravity
2.65
2.65
2.00
2.00
     2.  Sediment detached  at  one  point  and  deposited  at  another  is
     reattached to the soil surface.
     3.  Re-detachment of sediment requires the same amount  of  energy  as
     required for the original detachment.
     4.  For channel segments rainfall detachment is assumed to be zero and
     only  deposited  sediment  is made available for flow detachment, ^.e.
     original channel linings are not erodible.
Although these assumptions were made primarily to reduce the  computational
cost  of using the model, some were also required because little or no data
were available in the literature to quantify the particular process.

     After  consideration  of  the   relative   magnitude   of   the   four
detachment/transport  processes the transport of soil particles by rainfall
was assumed negligible.

     Combining the above equations and assumptions gives a  composite  soil
movement  model  wherein soil particles are dislodged from the soil mass by
both rainfall and flowing water.  Detached solids then become available for
transport  by  overland flow.  Within an element the material available for
transport is the combination of that detached within the element  and  that
which enters with inflow from adjacent elements.

     Once the available detached sediment within an element is  known,  the
transport  capacity  is  computed.   If  it  is  insufficient  to carry the
available material, the excess is deposited in the  element.   The  overall
accounting  relationship  for  this process is the differential form of the
continuity equation as applied above to water flow.  Sediment  carried  out
of  an  element is apportioned between adjacent elements in direct relation
to overland flow.

4.9.1.3 USER CONSIDERATIONS

     The selection of a specific model for use as  a  planning  tool  is   a
difficult  process  complicated  by the  large  number of different models
developed in recent years.  The most appropriate model to use  will  depend
most  of  all on the intended application, the type of input data available
and the suitability of the output  information generated.  The accuracy of  a
model's   simulation   should  also be  an  important  consideration,  but
unfortunately this is very difficult to judge.  Primarily this must be done
intuitively  by  a  through  study of  the relationships incorporated  into  a
 STUDY RESULTS

-------
                                                                        193
model.

     ANSWERS  represents  an  attempt   to  develop  a  comprehensive  model
intended   to  be of use in quantitatively evaluating the  importance of non-
point source pollution in an  ungaged   catchment  and  in determining   the
relative   effectiveness  of  alternative  corrective  measures.  One of  its
primary strengths arises from the use of a distributed  parameter  type  of
analysis   which  inherently  accounts   for  the  importance  of  the  areal
distribution of  the  many  relevant  factors.   The  distributed  analysis
provides   a  very  complete  characterization  of  hydrologic  response  and
erosion/deposition occurring at all points in the  watershed   throughout a
storm event.

     In its present form sediment is the only pollutant for  which  ANSWERS
gives  a direct numerical estimate.  This is the result of time limitations
and  the importance of sediment to  agricultural  non-point  pollution.   Of
course any pollutant which is closely correlated with sediment loss is also
easily predicted once erosion losses are known.  The modular   structure  of
the  model together with the advantages of a distributed modelling concept
make the addition of any other pollutants for which component  relationships
can  be developed rather easy.

     It was anticipated that  the  primary  use  of  ANSWERS   would  be  to
simulate   isolated  storm  events.   This decision was based on the general
consensus  of erosion research, confirmed by data from Black Creek, that  the
majority   of  annual  sediment  losses  result for only a few  of the larger
storms which occur in a year.  In order to use  the  model  for  continuous
simulation it  would  be  necessary  to  add  component  relationships  for
evapotranspiration and a different integration  algorithm  for  use  during
periods with no surface runoff.

     Selection of an appropriate element size to use with the  ANSWERS model
is   a  significant  decision  from  the standpoint of the cost of using  the
model.  Obviously, the larger the element size the lower  the cost of  input
data file preparation (for an area which has not previously been modelled)
and  the computer costs.  Therefore, it  is desirable to chose a size  which
is   as  large a possible without serious degradation of the accuracy of  the
subsequent simulation.   The  most  suitable  size  will  depend  upon   the
accuracy   requirements  of a specific application and on the degree of non-
uniformity of topography and soils in the watershed.  For the  Black  Creek
Project  an  element  size smaller than considered optimum for ordinary  use
was  deliberately chosen in order to evaluate the influence of  element  size
as   a  parameter.   From  that experience it is recommended that an element
size in the range of 2-5 ha will be satisfactory for most  applications  in
areas with a variability comparable to Black Creek.

     The primary effort required in  preparing  a  data  base  to  use   the
ANSWERS  model  on  a  particular  watershed  concerns  characterizing   the
topography and soil type of each element.  Where computer  compatible  data
files  with  such  information  are  not  available, U.S. Geological Survey
Topographic Maps and County Soil Survey Maps must  be  used.   While  these
sources  of information are quite adequate, the effort required to digitize
the  information is not trivial.

     A frequent  complaint  voiced  by  potential  users  of  comprehensive
watershed  models is the large volume of data required concerning watershed


                                                              STUDY RESULTS

-------
 194
characteristics.  This comment is often directed at  distributed  parameter
models  because a large data base is usually required.  However, one of the
fundamental strengths of comprehensive models is their potential ability to
characterize  the  many  processes  for  which  input  coefficients must be
specified.  When data are not  available  to  quantify  some  coefficients,
assumed  values  can be supplied.  While one is never comfortable in such a
situation, it is  easy  to  use  a  comprehensive  model  to  evaluate  the
sensitivity of the prediction to changes in assumed values.

     In  contrast,  "simpler"  models  that   require   less   input   have
incorporated at creation time implicit assumptions concerning all variables
for which explicit  numerical  values  are  not  demanded  from  the  user.
Because  these  assumptions  are implicit the user has neither control over
them nor any means of evaluating  their  importance.   Thus,  while  it  is
desirable  to  have  available  hard  data  to quantify all parameters of a
comprehensive model, it is better to assume values  for  a  model  than  to
submit  to  the  rigidity  of  implicit  assumptions  inherent with simpler
models.

     It is anticipated that future versions of ANSWERS will contain default
values  for all parameters so that completely inexperienced personnel would
not be required to make assumptions about initial parameter values  in  the
absence of hard data.

4.9.1.4 RESULTS

     Verification of the accuracy with which a model such  as  ANSWERS  can
simulate  the  behavior  of  natural  watersheds  is,  in  a  strict sense,
impossible.  This situation results from the number of degrees of  freedom,
i.e.  coefficient  values,  of  the  model.   It  is true that optimization
techniques could, given enough computer time, yield a set  of  coefficients
which  would  give  an  "accurate" simulation of almost any gaged event(s).
However, since it is not feasible to obtain field data to authenticate  the
correctness  of  each of these optimized coefficients, such an effort would
not prove the model is accurate.

     Fortunately, from  the  standpoint  of  application  of  a  model  for
planning  analysis  or  design,  one  needs to simulate hypothetical future
events rather than accurately reproduce historical records.  For such  uses
massive  amounts  of  data  concerning  antecedent  conditions   (with their
associated coefficient values) are irrelevant.  Coefficient values for such
hypothetical situations must be determined from probabilistic relationships
rather  than  measured  conditions.   Therefore,  massive  data  collection
efforts are not required for operational use of the model.

     Despite the impossibility of absolute model verification, a real  need
exists  to  provide  some  measure  of the accuracy of a model's simulation
during its developmental period.  Ultimately this comes down  to  comparing
its  output  with  gaged  data  from specific events on natural watersheds.
Several complex storm events which  occurred  during  1975  and  1976  were
simulated   for   two  gaged  subcatchments  of  the  Black  Creek.   These
subcatchments were 714 and 942 ha  (1765  and  2328  A)  in  size.   Beasley
(1977)  gives  a  detailed  discussion of these results.  While  they varied
somewhat from one storm to another and on the basis of evaluation criteria,
the  results  were  generally  within  30  percent  of gaged values for all
STUDY RESULTS

-------
                                                                       195
criteria.

     From  a  pollution  control  planning  standpoint  the  most  relevant
question  is  "What  needs  to  be  done  to  achieve  stated water quality
standards for a particular area?" The first step  necessary  to  rationally
respond  to  such  a  question  is  a  quantitative  assessment  of current
conditions.  The strength of using a distributed model for this purpose  is
best illustrated with an example.

     Figures 25 and 26 illustrate  some  of  the  more  applicable  outputs
available from an ANSWERS simulation.  They were produced by simulating the
behavior of a 714 ha subcatchment of the Black Creek Watershed using  1  ha
elements  together  with  cropping,  management  and  rainfall data for the
specified date.

     Figure 25 gives output typical of a lumped model, runoff and  sediment
concentration  hydrographs  at  the watershed outlet.  The simulated volume
was within 9 percent of the gaged amount (19 mm)  and  the  total  sediment
yield  within  13  percent  of  the  observed  amount  (325000  kg).  These
quantities were produced from a storm with 64 mm of rainfall.

     Any benefits of using a  distributed  parameter  model  instead  of  a
lumped one are not obvious from Figure 25.  While it was claimed above that
the distributed approach makes  possible  a  more  accurate  simulation,  a
single  example  of  close agreement between gaged and simulated results is
totally inadequate to judge to validity of such a claim.  Furthermore, even
an  extensive  set of comparative simulations using ANSWERS and the best of
available lumped models could establish only the relative merit between the
two  specific  models.  This would not offer conclusive evidence concerning
which of the two fundamental philosophies was superior.

     Figure 26 clearly illustrates one major  advantage  of  a  distributed
model,  more  comprehensive output information.  The "contour" lines on the
map result from connecting points within the  watershed  which  experienced
equal  soil  detachment  during  the storm.  Thus areas with closely spaced
lines correspond to regions of intense erosion.  Such maps readily identify
those regions where control measures should first be considered.

     Figure 26 indicates the bulk of the erosion  occurred  in  the  upland
portion  of  the watershed (the most steeply sloping region) with two small
areas experiencing a loss of more than 14000 kg/ha.  The  general  location
of  severe  erosion  could  certainly  have  been  predicted  by any person
familiar with the area and reasonably knowledgeable of  erosion  processes.
The  reason  for  modelling  the  area's  behavior  is  not to identify the
location of problem areas, but to obtain a quantitative  estimate  of  both
the amount of soil eroded and of its impact on water quality.

     Maps similar to Figure 26 can  be  produced  upon  request  for  other
factors  in  addition  to  eroded  soil.   For example, a deposition map or
concentration hydrographs at  any  point  within  the  watershed  are  also
available to a planner or designer.

     It is worth emphasizing that ANSWERS' prediction of both field erosion
and    sediment   concentrations   in   flowing   water   is   based   upon
detachment/transport relationships used  in  conjunction  with  topographic
data  about  the  watershed.   That  approach  eliminates the need to use a
                                                              STUDY RESULTS

-------
196
    .00-,
   20.00-
UJ
I—
cr
   40.00-
CE
o;
   60.00-1
            60.00•
            50 .00 -
            40.00 -
            30.00 -
          cc
          o;
            20 .00 -
            10.00-
                                                                        SED.


                                                                        RUN.
                           540.     1080.      1620.
                                                       2160.      2700.

                                                     TIME -  MINUTES
                                                                                                 12.00
                                                                                               - 10.00
                                                                                               -  8.00
                                                                                                  6.00
                                                                                                      CD
                                                                                                      CJ
                                                                                               -  4.00
                                                                                               -  2.00
                                                                                                   .00
                                                                          324Q.      378Q.      4320.
                      Figure  25.  Runoff  Rate  vs  Time in  Minutes
STUDY RESULTS

-------
                                                 197
Contours indicate kg/ha.





Management Practice = 2
    Figure 26.  Sediment Loss
                                    STUDY RESULTS

-------
198
   "delivery ratio" concept which is difficult (some would say impossible)  to
   accurately  quantify  for the infinite variety of situations which occur in
   natural catchments.

        The second  step  in  developing  a  program  to  meet  water  quality
   standards  for  an  area involves formulating and evaluating the effects of
   alternative strategies.  The detailed output  of  a  distributed  model  is
   ideally suited to this iterative step of planning.

        Figure 27 shows what  ANSWERS  predicts  would  be  the  effect  of  a
   hypothetical  change  in  tillage  practice  for the entire catchment.  The
   actual tillage practice used on almost all grain fields in the watershed is
   fall moldboard plowing.  Figure 26 was generated with that tillage practice
   specified.  Figure 27 was generated under  the  assumption  that  moldboard
   plowing  would  be  replaced by fall chisel plowing for all cropland in the
   catchment.

        In contrast to the moldboard plow, the chisel plow  leaves  more  crop
   residue  on  the  surface and a rougher micro-relief which tends to enhance
   infiltration.  Comparison of the two simulation results shows the impact of
   such  a management change on the resulting erosion pattern.  Integration of
   the sediment concentration hydrograph at the watershed's  outlet  indicates
   only 1/3 of the sediment yield simulated for current management practices.

        The purpose of this example  is  not  to  praise  the  benefits  of  a
   specific  tillage  practice.   In  fact,  the cost effectiveness, political
   acceptability and long-term consequences (such as unforseen  weed  or  pest
   problems)   of  making  significant management changes on a widespread scale
   are often questionable.  Such a course of action for this  catchment  would
   never be recommended if the information from the simulation shown in Figure
   26 is fully utilized.  That figure clearly shows the major  erosion  occurs
   from  few  a localized regions.  It is on these specific areas that control
   measures should first be evaluated.

        Figure 28 shows an ANSWERS simulation of the  effect  of  changing  to
   chisel  plowing  in only two of the highest erosion regions, those enclosed
   by broken lines.
   The total area of these two regions is only 32 ha of the watershed area  of
   714  ha.   Integration  of  the outflow hydrographs indicates that changing
   tillage on only these two small areas  would  achieve  40  percent  of  the
   sediment  yield reduction that could be achieved by changing the management
   of the entire watershed.

        It is the ability to be very site-specific  concerning  implementation
   plans and to quantitatively demonstrate the effects of hypothetical control
   measures on both upland regions and water quality conditions throughout the
   watershed  that  makes  a  distributed  parameter  model  such an effective
   planning tool.

   4.9.1.5 CONCLUSIONS

        A comprehensive, non-point source watershed simulator, named  ANSWERS,
   has been developed.  It was designed around a distributed parameter concept
   with the intention of giving an accurate, comprehensive  description  of  a
   watershed's  behavior  during  and immediately following storm events.  The
   purpose of  this  effort  was  to  develop  a  model  for  use  during  the
   STUDY RESULTS

-------
                                                               199
           Contours  indicate  kg/ha.





           Management Practice  =  .3
Figure 27. Upper Black Creek Watershed, Local Net Sediment boss
                                                   STUDY RESULTS

-------
200


      The primary strengths of the distributed parameter  approach  are  its
 inherent accuracy, especially for ungaged situations such as evaluating the
 influence  of  hypothetical  changes  to  a  watershed,  and  its  detailed
 description  of  the  behavior  of all interior points within a catchment1s
 boundaries.  The primary disadvantage of the approach is that the cost, for
 both  data  preparation  and  computer  time,  to use it increases somewhat
 proportionally to the area being simulated.

      While it is not possible to give rigid limits as to the  maximum  area
 that  can be simulated without resorting to subdivision into smaller units,
 current computer technology would suggest an upper limit in the range of 50
 to  200  sq  km.   This  is  not considered to be a serious handicap to the
 utility of the ANSWERS model to 208  implementation  planning  because  its
 intended  use  is  on  relatively small areas where detailed information is
 needed.  Other coarser procedures can be used on a "first  pass"  basis  to
 identify  subregions  of  a  large  basin  which have significant non-point
 pollution problems and therefore warrant the use  of  a  distributed  model
 prior to spending public funds to alleviate the problem.  Solomon and Gupta
 (1977), using a model structure identical to that employed in  the  ANSWERS
 model,  but with entirely different component relationships have developed a
 distributed model intended for use on a river basin scale.

      Extrapolation of  unit  cost  data  for  various  non-point  pollution
 control  measures and the watershed simulation example discussed above lead
 to the  same conclusion.  In order to  be  feasible,  any  non-point  source
 program must be highly site specific.   Attempts to treat large areas with a
 uniform set of practices or regulations will so dilute available funds that
 the   program  will  have  little  chance  of  being  effective  or publicly
 accepted.  ANSWERS offers a unique planning tool  to  help  formulate  site
 specific non-point source programs for agricultural areas.

      Annual loading data presented  in  earlier  Black  Creek  reports  and
 elsewhere  in  this volume have shown values which, when presented on a per
 hectare basis, are relatively low (on the order of 1000 kg/ha).  This value
 has   been,   by some individuals,  contrasted with values for "tolerable soil
 loss" used  in conjunction with the Universal Soil  Loss  Equation  to  draw
 incorrect  implications  concerning the potential effectiveness of BMP's to
 improve water quality.   Such comparisons are incorrect for several reasons.
 First,   it   is  almost  always  meaningless  to use values (either for soil
 losses  or unit costs)  based on averages per nectar over an entire watershed
 to  make extrapolations  to another watershed, especially of a much larger
 size.  Secondly, the USLE tolerable soil loss values  are  for  gross  soil
 erosion  on  upland  areas, not net transport at the outlet of a watershed.
 Because of  this there is no reason  to  believe  that  those  loss  values,
 developed  with the sole criteria of preserving long-term productivity, are
 directly applicable from the standpoint of  water  quality.   Finally,  the
 ANSWERS example presented above clearly demonstrates the falsity of drawing
 a  conclusion to the effect that "because loadings (on a per  hectare  basis
 over the  watershed)  are significantly below some xacceptable level1 it is
 either  unnecessary or maybe futile to consider a BMP." The model  indicated
 that for a specific storm with an average sediment yield of 460 kg/ha more
 than 25 percent of the yield could  have  been  prevented  by  a  different
 tillage practice on only 32 ha of the 714 ha catchment.

      The ANSWERS model is operational and available to anyone interested in
 using  it.   Because of the limited number of geographic regions on which it

 STUDY  RESULTS

-------
                                                                          201
             Figure 28.  Effect  of BMP's on Only Critical Areas
has been verified it  must  still  be  considered  to  be  in  a  stage  of
development  rather   than a fully operation model ready for widespread use.

                                                        STUDY RESULTS

-------
2Q2
  The primary reason for this status is the lack of parameter  values  tested
  for  numerous  regions.   However,  it  should be emphasized that parameter
  values required by the model have been designed to be  ones  with  a  known
  physical  analogy  rather that "black box" coefficients requiring extensive
  calibration in order to establish  values.   This  means  it  is  generally
  possible  to  obtain  parameter  values which are regionally dependent from
  available  publications,  e.g.   Soil  Survey   Reports   and   publications
  containing USLE soil erodibility and cropping factor  coefficients.  Because
  of the availability of such data and because of the  great  flexibility  of
  the  model,  it is considered applicable to a broad range of conditions and
  areas.  Finally,  if hard data are not available for a few parameters it  is
  possible  to estimate their values relative to published values for similar
  conditions and then use the  model  to  evaluate  the  sensitivity  of  the
  watershed to a plausible range  for those values.

       Two kinds of materials are available to assist users  of  the  ANSWERS
  model:  a user's  manual for persons interested it the direct utilization of
  the current version of the model in a  planning/design  application 'and  a
  manual describing concepts and  the inner structure of the model for persons
  interested in changing component relations used or in adding  relationships
  to  model  additional  processes.    These  materials  are available from the
  Department of Agricultural Engineering,  Purdue University,  W.  Lafayette, IN
  47907.
                                  References
  1.  Beasley,  D.B.   1977.  ANSWERS:  a mathematical model  for  simulating   the
  effects  of   land   use  and  management  on  water quality.  Ph. D. Thesis.
  Purdue Univ.

  2.  Curtis, D.C.   1976.  A deterministic urban   storm  water  and  sediment
  discharge model.   Proceedings of  the National Symposium  on Urban Hydrology,
  Hydraulics, and Sediment Control.   Univ. of Kentucky.  Lexington, KY.  July
  26-29.

  3.  Foster, G.R. and L.D. Meyer.  1972.  Transport  of   soil  particles  by
  shallow  flow.  Trans. ASAE.  15(1):99-102.

  4.  Foster,   G.R.   1976.   Sedimentation,  general.   Proceedings  of   the
  National  Symposium on  Urban Hydrology, Hydraulics, and Sediment Control.
  Univ. of Kentucky.  Lexington, Ky.  July 26-29.

  5.  Holtan, H.N.   1961.  A concept  for infiltration estimates in  watershed
  engineering.    Agricultural   Research   Service,   U.S.   Department   of
  Agriculture.  ARS-41-51.  25 p.

  6.  Horton, R.E.   1919.  Rainfall interception.   Monthly  Weather  Review.
  47:603-623.

  7.  Huggins,  L.F.  and E.J. Monke.   1966.  The  mathematical  simulation  of
  small  watersheds.   Water  Resources  Research  Center,  Purdue Univ.  Tech.
  Rept. 1.  130 p.


  STUDY RESULTS

-------
                                                                          203
 8.  Huggins,   L.F.,  J.R.  Burney,   P.S.  Kundu   and   E.J.  Monke.     1973.
 Simulation  of  the  hydrology  of   ungaged  watersheds.   Water  Resources
 Research Center, Purdue Univ.  Tech. Rept. 38.   70 p.

 9.  Huggins,   L.F.,  T.H.  Podmore,  and  C.F.   Hood.   1976.     Hydrologic
 simulation  using distributed parameters.  Water Resources Research Center,
 Purdue Univ.   Tech. Rept.  82.  59 p.

 10.  Meyer, L.D. and W.H.  Wischmeier.   1969.   Mathematical  simulation  of
 the processes  of soil erosion by water.  Trans.  ASAE.   12(6):754-758.

 11.  Overton,  D.E.   1965.   Mathematical  refinement   of  an   infiltration
 equation  for  watershed   engineering.  Agricultural Research Service, U.S.
 Department of  Agriculture.  ARS-41-99.  11 p.

 12.  Skaggs, R.W.,  L.F.   Huggins,   E.J.  Monke   and   G.R.  Foster.    1969.
 Experimental   evaluation   of  infiltration equations.   Trans. ASAE.  12(6):
 822-828.

 13.  Solomon,  S.I. and S.K. Gupta.   1977.  Distributed numerical  model  for
 estimating  runoff  and  sediment  discharge  of ungaged rivers. II. Model
 development.   Water Resources Research.  v!3, n3.  pp.  619-629.

 14.  Wischmeier, W.H. and  D.D.Smith.    1965.   Predicting  rainfall-erosion
 losses  from   cropland  east  of the Rocky Mountains.   Agric. Handbook' 282.
 Agric. Res. Serv., USDA.   47 p.

 15.  Yalin,  Y.S.   1963.   An  expression  for   bed-load   transportation.
 Hydraulics Division, ASCE.  89(HY3):221-250.

 4.9.2 Tile Drainage Simulation Model

     A computerized simulation  model   has  been developed  to   provide  a
 predictive  tool  for  determination of sediment losses from tile effluent.
 The model provides a flow  hydrograph with associated sediment loading as  a
 function  of   the  input   variables  (rainfall   and  initial  soil moisture
 content).  The model  will  have  the  capability  of being  modified  to
 represent different tile system designs and soil  types.

     The need  for concern  of tile drainage influence on water  quality  is
 shown by the significant contribution it has to  stream flow.  Approximately
 50 percent of  the Black Creek  Watershed  is  drained   by  subsurface  tile
 systems.   A   tile  system can  contribute anywhere from 10 to 100 percent
 (typically 30  percent)  of  the  total  runoff  of  a  drained  area.   This
 indicates  that  approximately 15 percent of the runoff per year  from Black
 Creek is tile  effluent.  During non-storm  periods  tile  effluent  is  the
major  source  for stream flow in agricultural areas.  The influence of tile
 flow on stream flow may vary  greatly  depending  on   the  annual  rainfall
distribution.

     An estimate of the sediment, phosphorus and nitrogen  going  into  the
Maumee  River   from Black Creek tile effluent is approximately 19,  .036 and
2.7 kilograms per hectare per year, respectively.  This  is  based  on  the
previous  flow assumption and tile effluent data collected by grab sampling
on 266 tile outlets in the Black Creek Watershed.   The  loading  rates  of
localized  areas  can  be  much larger as shown by G.  0. Schwab (1973).  He

                                                          STUDY  RESULTS

-------
 204
measured annual sediment losses from tiles as high  as  5400  kg/hect/year.
His  results  indicate that in some critical areas the tile effluent may be
the dominant effect on stream water quality.

4.9.2.1 BACKGROUND

     Glacial tilled soils of the Midwest seem to be susceptible to  erosion
losses  through tiles.  The soils drained by tiles generally have high silt
and clay contents.  These fine  particles  are  able  to  be  detached  and
transported  within  the  soil profile by forces exerted on them by flowing
water.  The actual  detachment  and  transport  mechanisms  within  a  soil
profile are not well understood, but many studies have been done in closely
related areas such as piping effects and force balance relationships within
soils.

     A model  by  D.  Zaslavsky  (1965)  describes  the  force  balance  of
particles  in  cohesive  soils.   This  model also shows the implied inter-
relationship of flow gradients to fine particle movement.  Particularly  it
indicates  that  for  a  given particle size a threshold flow level must be
reached before particle movatient  will  occur.   The  effect  of  the  flow
channel  size  on  the  threshold flow is also provided.  Zaslavsky's model
uses these relationships to obtain an expression which relates the critical
(threshold)  flow for particle movement to a given particle size assuming a
mean pore channel size.  To extend the use  of  Zaslavsky's  model  for  an
erosion  yield  model  it  becomes  necessary  to  attach  a  probabilistic
detachment  model  to  the  basic  force  balance  relationships.   Thus  a
probability  is  associated  with  the  critical  flow and has a functional
relationship to flow above the critical flow.  So for a given particle size
and flow rate it is possible to show a distribution of detachment potential
for a particle size distribution.  The probabilistic approach used by H. A.
Einstein   (1950)  provided  excellent  results  for particle detachment and
transport in open channels.

     The particle detachment model described above  requires  knowledge  of
the  water  flux  distribution  within the soil profile.  Several tile flow
models  (4) are available, but none are uniquely suited for a  tile  erosion
model.   Therefore  a  two-dimensional  porous  medium  flow model has been
developed to provide the necessary water flux distribution within the  soil
profile.   The  flow  in  the  unsaturated  profile region is determined by
Darcy's Law which is the tension-conductivity method.  The flow at the tile
will be tentatively determined by Toksoz and Kirkham's formula  (1961) using
the watertable height above the tile.  This tile flow formula was developed
for  a constant infiltration rate passing through an unsaturated layer into
a saturated layer.  This indicates continuity at the  watertable  which  is
required  to effectively model across this transition layer.  Continuity is
expressed as:
                 Change in water storage = Inflow - Outflow


Using the assumption that a known geometric flow pattern  exists  near  the
tile,   the  magnitude of water movement near the tile can be generated as a
function of R and 0  (radian  distance  and  angular  direction  from  tile,
respectively).  Flow nets are available for several different soil profiles
above tiles  (1957).  The water flux is then used to determine the  relative
volume  of  soil  which is experiencing a certain erosion potential.  These
volumes are then summed for all erosion potentials for given particle sizes


STUDY  RESULTS

-------
                                                                          205
 to  determine   total  erosion potential.   As  indicated,  the  sediment  loss  is
 determined  as  a distribution shape  and therefore  absolute  magnitudes  are
 not  directly   provided by this approach.  Field data is needed  to quantify
 the sediment loss distribution.

 4.9.2.2  MODEL  FOR PARTICLE DETACHMENT

      The forces acting on  a soil particle can be summarized as:

                Fg —  gravitation force
                Fc —  cohesive  force (attraction between particles)
                Fh —  hydraulic forces  (caused by water  movement)
                Fp —  point forces  (caused by physical   contact   with  other
                particles)

 To get particle movement,  the  hydraulic forces Fh must  exceed  the  sum  of
 all the  other  forces, that is,
                         F   >  F   + F   + F
                          h     g     P
4.9.2.2.1 Gravitation Force

     The effective gravitation force is the submerged weight of a particle.


                           Fg =  V
-------
206
 therefore,

                                              +  AD)
                                           f(D)dD                          (16)
                                          (D.  -  AD)

 The  variables in the above expressions are described  as follows:  A is area
 of test sample, gt is failure stress of test sample,ai  is a geometric factor
 for  the  i-th  particles  shape,  A^  is  the  i~th  particle  area which is
 influenced  by the shear-stress,  a^is the stress of the i-th particles, n is
 the  number of particles in the  test layer, D is a particles size, "^is the
 fraction of particles in the i-th  particle interval  which has   a 2£Dwidth.
 The  density  function f(D)  should be proportional to  the square inverse of
 the particle size and directly proportional to the particle distribution.

 4.9.2.2.3 Hydraulic Forces

      A particle experiences drag and lift forces when  flowing  water  passes
 over  it.  The sum of these forces is equal to the overall hydraulic force,
 that is,

                            F  = F      + F
                             h     lift    drag                           (17)
 Drag forces are given by Stokes Law:

                                              2
                                                                            (18)
 Parameters  are  described  as  follows:   Ap  is the effective area factor
 (accounts for particle size exposed to the stream flow  y  fR.eis  Reynold's
 Number, and p is the density of water.                   ^

      The lift force on a particle is developed when the water flows  faster
 over  one  side  of  the  particle  than  the other.  The lift force for an
 attached particle can be expressed as a function of its exposed surface and
 the velocity   of water across its surface.


                               FL = CLV2


 Parameters  not  previously described are as follows: Cj,   lift coefficient
 and F-^is exposed surface factor.

 4.9.2.2.4 Ratio of Non-Point Forces

      For particle detachment the hydraulic force must exceed the sum of the
 cohesive and gravitational forces or expressed as a ratio.

                              F   + F
                              IS	S. = R <  1                             (20)
                                  Fh

     STUDY RESULTS

-------
                                                                         207
If  the  ratio  R is less than unity then the potential for erosion exists.
However, the above expression assumes that all particles of the  same  size
experience  the  same  cohesive  force.  This was not the case, so a normal
distribution was assumed  such  that  a  probability  exists  for  particle
detachment  for  R's  slightly greater than one.  This serves to smooth out
the computer summation of the erosion potentials.

4.9.2.2.5 Point Forces

     The point forces are impossible to describe for any one particle.  The
magnitude of these forces can be very large, but intuitively one can reason
that only the particles near a free surface will have  any  possibility  of
small  or  zero  point  forces.   Within  a  soil  profile only the smaller
particles (clay and silt) will see free surfaces in the pore  cavities  and
channels.   A  probability  p  for  detachment must be associated with each
particle size D to account for the point forces.  Now  the  probability  of
detachment  is  the probability that the point force F.is less than all the
other forces, that is,

                     Prob  [Fp < Fh(l -  R)l  - P                  ^
     This  functional relationship of p will vary by soil type and depth in
profile.

4.9.2.3 DISCUSSION

     Several of the  relationships  presented  are  not  easily  determined
experimentally.    Therefore,  some  assumed  relationships  will  be  used
initially until reliable laboratory data is available.  The accuracy of the
model  to  predict actual erosion losses will serve to validate or disprove
assumed relationships.  It should be  noted  that  all  forces  are  vector
quantities and therefore, the numeric analysis of the erosion model will be
more complex than indicated above.

     The time dependence of the detachment mechanism is represented by  the
probabilistic  relationships  of  the  point hydraulic forces.  In order to
change the erosion potential of a particle either the flow must  change  or
another  particle  near  it  must  move.   So over time the loss of surface
particles increases the probability of detachment of particles beneath  the
surface  layer.   Armoring  will  occur over time, but for this model it is
assumed that natural soil weathering will periodically recharge the smaller
particles in the pore cavities and channels.

     To use the particle detachment model, it is convenient to combine  the
probabilistic  and  force  balance relationships into one erosion potential
expression for a tile system. . The detachment model provides a  fraction
of  particles  detached  per  unit  area  per  unit  time  for the particle
distribution interval   D±AD  at  a  given  water  flux.   Define  erosion
potential  as the ratio or erosion rate at tile flow TQ to the erosion rate
at maximum tile flowf      It  is  now  possible  to  compute  the  erosion
potential  at  a TQ by making the assumptions of geometric flow net and the
                                                           STUDY RESULTS

-------
 208


  same soil texture throughout the  profile.   The  computation  requires  an
  integration  over  the  entire soil profile for each particle size interval
  used and then the addition of the results.   For  Zaslavsky's  relationship
  and  a radial flow assumotion the erosion potential is given as:
EP  =
                                                                              (22)
  The parameter QC;JJ,S the critical flow for a-'given particle size  .

  4.9.2.4  COMPUTER MODEL

       The tile  model is programmed in the GASP IV Simulation Language.  GASP
  IV  was   selected  because  of  its advanced time stepping and differential
  equation solving techniques.  The computer model breaks  the  soil  profile
  above the tile into N layers (see Figure 29).
                                     Soil Surface
Tile Depth
                         Figure 29.  Tile system Layout
  Hydraulic  conductivity for each layer can  be  provided  separately.   This
  gives   tremendous  latitude  in  the  types  of  soil profiles which can be
  analyzed.   Flow between each layer is determined for each time step by  use
  of Darcy's Law.
                             q  = k
                                     9(T +  Z)
                                        3Z
                      At
                                                    (23)
  Continuity  at  the watertable is determined by comparison of the flow into
  STUDY RESULTS

-------
                                                                    209
 the layer in which the watertable is located and the flow out the  tile  as
 determined by Toksoz and Kirkham's method.
                        TQ  (tile flow)  =    M_                           (24)
 Parameters  described above are as follows:   q is vertical  water  flux,  K is
 hydraulic conductivity,  T is tension head,  Z  is elevation head, t is  time,
 H  is  height  of watertable above tile center, S is tile spacing,  and  F is
 geometry coefficient for the tile system layout.   Initial attempts  will use
 Zaslavsky's  piping  relation,        and associated erosion potential.   The
 probabilistic model  will be added when fully  developed.

      The computer model  solves  the above relationships   for  any  rainfall
 distribution provided.   The output of the model is a plot and  table of  tile
 outflow and sediment loading rate as a function of time.  Also, at  any  time
 during  the simulation a moisture plot can  be obtained for  the soil profile
 above tile.

 4.9.2.4.1 Discussion

      A similar problem exists for the hydraulic model as  in the   detachment
 model,  that  is,  some of the parameters are  not  readily  available  and  when
 available are in  a graphic form.   Graphs are  empirically  hard  to  represent
 in  a  computer  program  if they  do  not   have a functional relationship
 (equation)  which  will represent them.   This is the problem  with many of the
 required  parameters  for  the   tile  erosion  model.   The relationship of
 tension  and  hydraulic   conductivity  exhibit hysteresis   which   further
 complicates  exact  determination.   Because of these determination  problems
 linear assumptions are made for  some of the relationships.   It will be  done
 so   that   the   parameter's  representation  will  be   within   obtainable
 experimental error.   Linearization also greatly increases the  efficiency of
 the  computer program.

 4.9.2.5 CALIBRATION  USING TILE  SAMPLER DATA

      Field data is essential  to  calibrate and verify the  computer model.
 As  indicated  the  sediment  loss potential as determined by the  model  does
 not   provide  absolute  magnitudes  of   the   sediment loss directly.    To
 calibrate  this potential  distribution  at least one water quality sample is
 needed during a significant flow period.  This in itself  does not assure
 that    the  computed  shape  of   the potential   distribution  is  correct.
 Therefore,  it is necessary to have water quality   data  for  as   many   flow
 conditions  as  possible in order  to  compare the distribution shapes of  both
 the actual  and  simulated  sediment loss  curves.  To obtain this data base an
 automatic  pumping  tile sampler was installed  on a tile draining forty- three
 acres  of  a typical soil type  (Hoytville) of the Black Creek Watershed.

 4.9.2.6 AUTOMATIC TILE SAMPLER

     An automatic tile sampler has been operational  since March,  1976.   The
peak   flow  periods  for   tiles   are  during   the winter  and spring months.
Therefore,  the  equivalent  of  two  years  of  data  for  calibration   and
verification  of the tile model should be available by late spring of 1977.
This pump sampler data has also been  analyzed  to  provide  loading  rates


                                                          STUDY  RESULTS

-------
  210
directly  for' the determination  the tile effluents effect on water quality.
The  fertilizer nutrients have also been looked at closely to  define   their
loss rate  through the tile system.

      The operation of the tile sampling station is unique in that  discrete
water  quality samples  are  collected proportionally to the tile outflow,
which is continuously monitored  and recorded.  The time at which  a  sample
is   collected  is  also recorded on the flow hydrograph chart.  The sampler
has  the  capability of collecting 72-500  ml  water  samples.   The  sampler
rates  are approximately 1 sample per 30 minutes at maximum flow decreasing
to 1 sample per 12 hours at low  flow.  Another feature of the tile sampling
station  is prevention of the tile outlet from becoming inundated.  This is
necessary to provide reliable data during storm events in which  the   ditch
water  level   is  above  the  tile  outlet.   Two  200  GPM  pumps  used in
conjunction with a sump maintain a free water fall over the flow calibrated
weir.    Pump   "on" times are also recorded to provide a check for the  water
volume passing through the station.  See Figure 30 for more detail  of the
tile monitoring station.

4.9.2.7  SUMMARY

     The hydrologic  model  is  working  for  the  assumptions  previously
mentioned and  for a modified non-linear moisture-tension relationship  which
was  determined by laboratory experiments.  The model's output is  in   close
agreement   with   field   data.    The   hydraulic   conductivity-moisture
relationship is not yet fully developed, therefore  further  refinement  of
the  model  is expected.  The sediment detachment model will be attached to
the  hydrologic model when the hydrologic model is fully calibrated.

     The sampler station has functioned well for the past two  years.   The
collected   samples   have   been   analyzed   for  sediment  and  nutrient
concentrations.  Results of this analysis are given in Section 0.0.

                                 References

     1.  Schwab, G.O.  and  E.O.  McLean.   1973.   Chemical  and  Sediment
Movement from  Agricultural  Land  into  Lake  Erie.  Ohio Water Resources
Center.  Ohio State University.  Report No.  390X.

     2.  Zaslavsky,  D. and G. Kassiff.  1965.  Theoretical  Formulation  of
Piping   Mechanism  in  Cohesive  Soils.   Geotechnique  Vol.  15.   No.  3.
Institution of Civil Engineers.  Haifa, Israel.

     3.   Einstein,   H.A.   1950.   The  bed-load  Function  for   sediment
transportation  in  Open  Channel  Flow.   U.S.  Dept.  Agric., Tech.  Bull.
No.1026.

     4.  Luthin, J.N.  1966.  Drainage Engineering.  John Wiley  and   Sons,
Inc.

     5.   Toksoz,  S.  and  D.  Kirkham.   1961.   Graphical  Solution and
Interpretation  of  a New Drain-spacing Formula.  J_. Geophys. Res.  66:509-
516.

     6.  Luthin, J.N.  1957.  Drainage of AGricultural Lands.  Published by
Am.  Soc. Agro. Madison, Wise.
 STUDY RESULTS

-------
                                                          211
                             Flow Baffles




                        Pump Float Switches




                          (2)  200 GPM Pumps









Figure 30. Automatic  Tile Sampling Station
                                            STUDY RESULTS.

-------
212
  4.10 STUDIES OF NUTRIENT AVAILABILITY

       Laboratory incubation  experiments  were  conducted  to  evaluate  the
  transformations  of  nitrogen  and  phosphorus  in  water  systems.   These
  transformations are important in determining the fate of N and  P  entering
  water resources from agricultural land.

  4.10.1 Effect of Incubation Temperature

       The temperate zone of the U.S.  is subject to wide  variations  in  air
  temperature throughout the year and  thus, the temperature regime in surface
  waters will vary diurnally  and  seasonally.   The  effects  of  incubation
  temperature on the soluble phosphorus and inorganic nitrogen composition of
  creek water are given in Table 87.  The concentration of soluble  inorganic
  phosphorus   increased   significantly   with   time   at   all  incubation
  temperatures; however, the increases were greater at  higher  temperatures.
  The  increase  in  inorganic phosphorus was approximately one-third greater
  for samples incubated at 33 degrees  C as compared to those incubated  at  5
  degrees  C.   The  soluble  organic   phosphorus  concentration  in  samples
  decreased with time, but the rate of decrease  was  slower  at  the  lowest
  incubation temperature.

       The concentration of total soluble phosphorus generally increased with
  time  of  incubation.   This  finding suggests that the increase in soluble
  inorganic  phosphorus  in  samples  is   not   entirely   the   result   of
  mineralization  of  soluble organic  phosphorus, but may in part result from
  desorption of inorganic phosphorus from the sediment or  mineralization  of
  organic phosphorus in the sediment.   During the 12 weeks of incubation 1.8,
  2.1, 3.75, and 8.25 yg of phosphorus per  sample  were  released  from  the
  sediment  to  the  solution phase of samples incubated at 5, 15, 23, and 33
  degrees C respectively.

       In all samples except those incubated at 33 degrees C,  the  ammonium-
  nitrogen  content  increased during  the first week, probably as_a result of
  mineralization of organic nitrogen.   Nitrification  was  rapid  in  samples
  incubated  at  all  temperatures  as  evidenced  by the increase in nitrate
  content  with  time.   The  nitrate   concentration  in  incubated   samples
  increased  steadily  with  time and  reached approximately the same level in
  all treatments after 12 weeks of incubation.  After 12 weeks of  incubation
  188,  224,  218,  231  yg  of  nitrogen  per  sample were released from the
  sediment to the solution phase in samples incubated at  5,  13,23,  and  33
  degrees  C,  respectively.   The  increase in soluble inorganic nitrogen is
  likely the result of mineralization  of  organic  nitrogen  present  in  the
  sediment phase of creek water.

       As stated previously, temperature has a definite effect  on  the  rate
  with  which  insoluble  nutrients become  available  and  on the amount of
  nutrients that are  converted  to water  soluble  forms.   The  increasing
  amounts  of  nitrogen  and phosphorus converted to water soluble forms were
  directly proportional to the incubation temperature.  This is a significant
  finding  since  aquatic  plants  exhibit  accelerated  growth  rates during
  periods of elevated water temperature, provided the temperature  is  within
  the  optimum range for growth.  If water temperatures increase in a lake or
  pond in which algal growth is a problem, the data obtained from  incubation
  experiments indicate that increased  amounts of nitrogen and phosphorus will
  become available to aquatic plants.   In lakes where  the  temperature  does


  STUDY  RESULTS

-------
                                                                       213
                                  TABLE 87
       Effect of Temperature on the Concentration of Solution N and P
Treatment
Degrees C
5




13




23




33




Change in
Incubation concentration
time Concentration of soluble during incubation
(weeks) Inorg-P Org. P Amm.-N Nit.-N Sol-P Sol.inorg-N
**<^. /•>

0
1
3
6
12
0
1
3
6
12
0
1
3
6
12
0
1
3
6
12

.189
.161
.182
.280
.286
.189
.210
.261
.288
.295
.189
.220
.258
.309
.314
.189
.279
.280
.315
.340

.104
.132
.123
.093
.019
.104
.076
.017
.043
.012
.104
.090
.024
.018
.004
.104
.080
.018
.024
.008

0.54
0.97
1.20
0.76
0.10
0.54
1.16
0.24
0.10
0.07
.054
1.15
0.21
0.22
0.10
0.54
0.19
0.16
0.22
0.07
i»y/A
2.88
2.92
3.19
3.86
4.57
2.88
2.92
4.28
4.59
4.84
2.88
2.97
4.36
4.84
4.77
2.88
3.82
4.10
4.93
4.89

__
.000
.012
.080
.012
_
-.007
-.015
.038
.014
__
.017
-.003
.034
.125
_
-.066
.005
.046
.055

_
.47
.97
1.20
1.25
_
.66
1.10
1.27
1.49
_
0.70
1.15
1.64
1.45
__
0.59
0.84
1.73
1.54
not exceed 5 degrees C, the nutrient status would be much lower  and  thus,
reduce the potential for the growth of aquatic plants.

4.10.2 Effect of Aeration Status and Shaking

     Sediments  are  subjected  to  various  levels  of   aeration   during
transportation and deposition in natural waters.  Aeration is known to have
a great effect upon the soluble nitrogen and phosphorus  in  water-sediment
systems.   It  is essential to determine the role of sediments in supplying
soluble nutrients in natural water systems.

     The effects of aeration status and shaking on the soluble nitrogen and
phosphorus  components  of  creek  water incubated for 12 weeks is given in
Table 88.
It was anticipated that shaking would increase the degree  of  aeration  in
samples;  however,  there was little difference in dissolved oxygen content
of static or shaken samples.  The dissolved oxygen measurements taken after
incubation  of  helium  purged  samples show that that anaerobic conditions
were  not  maintained  throughout  the  incubation  period;  however,   the
dissolved  oxygen  content  was much lower than in those samples which were
                                                           STUDY  RESULTS

-------
214
                              a.
                                4-1 O
C ft C

U 3
C O •— i—
O C O >s.
o --loo w>
c w
— c
.- o.
D i_ i
cfl 3 •—
C T3 O
(0 00
JZ
r:
1
CJ 1 rA
r- O
.0 2
,_
O
IT) "^"

c rrf
0 c.
4-1 .
fO to
1 1 f~.
*-' O ~-^
OJ p-
u e-
t— bu
O i_
«-> 0
c
73
CJ
> 4-1
.— c
o c<
LO CM 4-1
to o c
o
C2 O

c
O '-
— to
4-J C -^
tD E (U
_Q ._ QJ
o ^
c
c
(U

4J
fO
(U
V.





O LA J- LA
r~. rH to -a-
1 • • • •
O rH rH rH






r-^ fA J- LA
rH O |vA CM
1 O O O CD
• • • •
O O CD CD

co r-~ tD J" r~-
oo en IA co r-
CM CM J" J" -=T


J- LA rH CM e
LA rH CM CM rH
C rH CD O CD

-3- O -rj- CO -3"
CD CTJ CM i— 1 CD
rH O 0 O O
O O O O CD

Cl O 00 CD J"
CO CM LA O rH
rH CM CM hA hA
O O O O O





CD LA O LA
1 tO CO J" LA
. • • •
CO CO CD CD




O rH tA CD CM
rH



O O

.Q +->
o ro
L J j*
0) LO





r^ to o
r~> LA CM
i . . i
O rH CM






CM CD CO
cn j- to
1 O O 1 O
• • •
o o o

CO CM CD CO
CO rH 1 — CM
CM j- -a- LA


j- r^* cn -3*
LA O rH tA
CD 0 O O

J- O O O
O rH O CD
rH rH O 1 O
O O O O

CD LA CM rH
03 r~- -J- to
rH CM ^A 1 rA
0 C 0 0






0 LA 0
i r>> r-^ i IA
• • •
CO CO CD



CD rH hA tO OJ
-u._|




o
._ o
.Q _i^
o ra
v. ^z
0) to





r^> cn cn to
r^- CM j- to
i • • • •
O rH rH rH






CO l-~ tO 1 —
rA 0 J- LA
1 O O O O
• • • •
0 O 0 0

co cn CM to rH
co j- to r>- CD
CM I-A -3- J- -=T


j- o CD LA r^.
LA r«- O rH rH
00000

J- hA O CD O
O CD CD CD O
rH rH O 0 0
CD CD O O O

CD OO CD 1 — tO
CO CM CD -3" rA
rH CM tA CM CM
O C3 O CD CD






CD CD O CD
1 rA CD tO LA
• • • •
CM CM CM CD
*


O rH I>A tO CM




~0
E CJ 0)
3 bO -^
.— i_ ro
— 3 -C
01 Q. to
  STUDY  RESULTS

-------
                                                                       215
not helium purged. The soluble  inorganic phosphorus concentration  increased
with  time in aerobic samples; however, in helium purged samples  the  soluble
inorganic phosphorus increased  for the first three weeks and  then  decreased
during  the last nine weeks of  incubation.  The levels of soluble  inorganic
phosphorus were significantly higher in aerobic samples which were  shaken
as  compared  to  those  which  were static.  The soluble organic phosphorus
content of all samples tended to decrease with time; however, the  rate  of
decrease  of  soluble  organic  phosphorus  content  during the  11 weeks of
incubation was greatest in samples which were shaken.   The   total  soluble
phosphorus  content  of  all samples tended to reach a peak value  after one
week  of incubation and then remain relatively constant or decline  with time
thereafter.

      In aerobic samples, the decline in total  soluble  phosphorus  content
resulted  from  more  rapid  decreases  in  soluble organic phosphorus than
increases in soluble inorganic  phosphorus, whereas in helium  purged  samples
soluble   organic   phosphorus  rapidly  decreased  and  soluble   inorganic
phosphorus increased for three  weeks  and  then  decreased   giving  a  net
decrease in total soluble phosphorus. During 12 weeks of incubation  3.75 yg
and 10.2  g of phosphorus were  released to the solution phase from sediment
in  aerobic  samples  which were static and shaken, respectively.  In helium
purged samples 8.55 yg phosphorus per sample was removed from the  solution
phase during 12 weeks of incubation.

     The ammonium content of  aerobic  static  samples  and   helium  purged
samples  increased  during the  first week of incubation, decreased to a low
level during the next two weeks, and then remained low during the  remainder
of  the  incubation  period.    The ammonium concentration in  aerobic shaken
samples decreased during the first  week  of  incubation  and  then  slowly
increased  during the remaining 11 weeks of incubation. The nitrate  content
of all samples increased rapidly during the initial one to three   weeks  of
incubation and then increased slowly during the remainder of  the incubation
period.  The finding that nitrification  was  occurring  in   helium  purged
samples  is  good  evidence  that  the  samples were not anaerobic and that
nitrification is not limited by relatively low dissolved oxygen contents in
the water.

     The soluble inorganic nitrogen content of samples tended  to  increase
with  time  throughout  the incubation.  During 12 weeks of incubation 218,
330, and 249 yg  of inorganic phosphorus  per  sample  were   released  from
sediment  to  the  solution  phase  in  aerobic static, aerobic shaken, and
helium-purged shaken sample,  respectively.   This  finding   suggests  that
shaking  may  increase  the  mineralization  of organic nitrogen and that a
reduction of dissolved oxygen in water may decrease the  mineralization  of
organic nitrogen.

4.10.3 Effect of Calcium Carbonate Addition

     Sediments may contain various concentrations of calcium carbonate  and
it  has  been  reported  that  calcium  carbonate  has  the ability  to sorb
phosphate.  However,  it  has  been  found  that  the  phosphorus  sorption
capacity  of  lake  sediments  tended  to  be  inversely related to  calcium
carbonate content.  Since eroded soil  materials  may  contain  significant
amounts  of  calcium  carbonate,  it  is  desirable to study the effects of
calcium carbonate on solubility in sediment-water systems.

     The effects of adding calcium carbonate on the soluble nutrient levels
in creek water samples incubated for 12 weeks is given in Table 89.

                                                            STUDY RESULTS

-------
  216
                                  TABLE 89
      The Effect of Calcium Carbonate on the Level of Soluble N and P
Incubation

Treatment


None




CaC03*




time
(weeks)


0
1
3
6
12
0
1
3
6
12
Concentration of soluble
Inorg-P


0.189
0.220
0.258
0.309
0.314
0.185
0.203
0.260
0.270
0.289
Org.P Amm.-N
•nn/1
mg/i
0.104 0.54
0.090 1.15
0.024 0.21
0.018 0.21
0.004 0.10
0.117 0.57
0.050 0.89
0.013 0.14
0.015 0.29
0.000 0.36
Nit.-N


2.88
2.97
4.36
4.84
4.77
2.97
3.11
4.81
4.64
5.20
Change in
concentration
during incubation
Sol-P Sol


_
0.017
0.003
0.034
0.025
_
0.049
0.029
0.017
0.013
inorg-N


_
0.69
1.14
1.63
1.44
_
0.46
1.41
1.39
2.02
   2 grains of CaC03 added per sample.
The finding that addition of large amounts of  calcium  carbonate  did  not
significantly  decrease  the initial levels of soluble inorganic phosphorus
or soluble organic  phosphorus  in  water  samples  suggests  that  calcium
carbonate does not sorb soluble phosphorus in samples of Black Creek water.
The levels of soluble inorganic phosphorus  increased  with  time  in  both
calcium  carbonate  amended  and  unamended  samples.   The soluble organic
phosphorus concentration decreased with time in both amended and  unamended
samples,  but  the  rate  of  decrease  was more rapid in calcium carbonate
amended samples.  The total soluble phosphorus content of calcium carbonate
amended  samples  decreased  during  the  first week of incubation and then
increased slowly during the remainder of the incubation period.  The  total
soluble  phosphorus  content  of  unamended samples increased for the first
week of incubation, decreased during the next two weeks, and then increased
to  a  near  constant  level  for  the  remainder of the incubation period.
During the 12 week incubation period, 3.75 yg of phosphorus per sample were
released  to  the  solution  phase  of unamended sample, whereas in calcium
carbonate unamended samples,  1.95  yg  of  phosphorus  were  removed  from
solution.   The effect of calcium carbonate on the total soluble phosphorus
content of  water  samples  was  likely  due  to  decreased  desorption  of
inorganic  phosphorus  from  sediment  or  to  decreased  mineralization of
organic phosphorus by the sediment.

     The soluble ammonium  content  of  calcium  carbonate  amended  amples
increased  during  the  first week of incubation and then declined to a low
level  for  the  remainder  of  the   incubation   period.    The   nitrate
concentration  increased  with  time  in both calcium carbonate amended and
unamended samples,  amended and unamended samples.  There was little effect
of  calcium  carbonate  addition  on  the  apparent  nitrification  rate in
samples.  The total soluble inorganic nitrogen  content  of  unamended  and
STUDY RESULTS

-------
                                                                        217
calcium   carbonate  samples   increased  at  about  the same rate during  the
first six weeks of incubation.  However after twelve  v/eeks  of  incubation
216  yg nitrogen were released to the solution in unamended samples whereas
303 y'g nitrogen were released  in calcium carbonate  amended samples.

4.10.4 Addition of Soluble Inorganic Phosphorus

     Table 90 gives data on the effects of the initial inorganic phosphorus
concentration  on  the level of soluble phosphorus  in creek water subjected
to laboratory incubation.  Replacement of the liquid  phase  of  the  creek
water  samples  with  distilled  water markedly lowered the initial soluble
inorganic phosphorus content and increased the soluble  organic  phosphorus
content  of  the  samples  relative  to the untreated samples.  Addition of
organic phosphorus (34 or 84 yg per sample) markedly increased the  soluble
inorganic phosphorus content of water samples (91 percent and 63 percent of
the added inorganic phosphorus remained in solution at  the  low  and  high
addition  rates,  respectively).  Addition of 34 yg of inorganic phosphorus
per sample decreased the  level  of  soluble  organic  phosphorus,  whereas
addition  of  84  y g  phosphorus  per  sample increased the soluble organic
phosphorus concentration.  The  soluble  inorganic  phosphorus  content  of
samples  whose liquid phase was replaced by water increased with time up to
three weeks of incubation and  then remained  relatively  constant  for   the
remainder  of  the  incubation  period.   The  soluble inorganic phosphorus
content of samples amended  with  inorganic  phosphorus  tended  to  remain
relatively  constant  with  time  during  incubation.   The soluble organic
phosphorus content of most samples decreased rapidly during the first three
weeks  of  incubation  and  then  o.cureased  slowly thereafter.  In samples
amended with 34 i-g of inorganic phosphorus the soluble  organic  phosphorus
content  increased  rapidly  during  the  first week of incubation and then
decreased rapidly thereafter.  The  total  soluble  phosphorus  content  of
samples  whose  liquid  phase  was  replaced  by  distilled water decreased
throughout the period of incubation.  The total soluble phosphorus  content
of  samples  amended with 34 yg of inorganic phosphorus remained relatively
constant throughout the incubation period, however, in samples amended with
84 yg  of  inorganic  phosphorus  the  total  soluble  phosphorus  content
decreased markedly for the first three weeks and remained constant.

     The fact that  the  soluble  organic  phosphorus  content  of  amended
samples  was  decreasing  faster  than  the soluble inorganic P content  was
increasing suggests that at least a portion  of  the  decrease  in  organic
phosphorus  from  solution  is the result of sorption of organic phosphorus
compounds by sediments.  During 12  weeks  of  incubation,  the  amount  of
phosphorus  lost  from  solution  (sorbed  by  sediments  or immobilized in
microbial cells)  was 11.4, 2.25, and 22.95 yg  of phosphorus per sample  for
samples  with liquid phase replacement, amendment with 34 ug of phosphorus,
and amendment with 84 ug phosphorus respectively.

4.10.5 Addition of Soluble Inorganic Nitrogen

     The effects of the initial levels of soluble inorganic nitrogen on  the
concentrations of ammonium and nitrate in creek water samples incubated  for
12 weeks is given in Table 91.   Replacement of the  liquid phase of  samples
with  distilled  water  markedly  reduced  the  initial  concentrations  of
ammonium and nitrate in incubated samples.  Addition  of  ammonium  nitrate
(1500  or  6000  g nitrogen per sample)  increased the initial concentration
of both forms of inorganic nitrogen in solution, although  from  12  to  24


                                                          STUDY RESULTS

-------
218
                                  TABLE 90
          Effect of  SIP Addition  on  the Level  of  soluble  Phosphorus
Incubation

Treatment

Deionized
Water*



None




34 g P
added



84 g P
added



time
(weeks)

0
1
3
6
12
0
1
3
6
12
0
1
3
6
12
0
1
3
6
12
Concentration Change in
concentration
of soluble of total soluble P
Inorg.P


0.052
0.125
0.174
0.171
0.157
0.189
0.220
0.258
0.309
0.314
0.396
0.404
0.412
0.401
0.433
0.545
0.466
0.513
0.551
0.544
Org.P during
^ j /i
mg/i
0.181
0.083
0.009
0.005
0.000
0.104
0.090
0.024
0.018
0.004
0.055
0.040
0.025
0.008
0.002
0.159
0.174
0.029
0.014
0.007
incubation


_
.026
.059
.076
.076
_
.017
.013
.035
.025
_
.050
.013
.041
.015
—
.064
.162
.139
.153
    Entire  liquid phase of  sample  replaced with deionized
    water.
percent of  the  added  ammonium was   apparently  removed   from  solution   by
cation  exchange   reactions   with   sediment.   The  ammonium concentration in.
samples having  their  liquid phase replaced with  distilled  water   remained
low  throughout  12   weeks  of   incubation.    The  ammonium concentration in
samples treated with  ammonium nitrate  remained constant  for   one   week   and
then  decreased to very low values  during the  next two weeks  of incubation.
The nitrate content of  samples having   their   liquid  phase   replaced  with
distilled   water   tended to  increase slowly  during  the incubation period.
The nitrate content of  samples amended with   ammonium   nitrate increased,
slowing during  the first week of incubation, then  increasing  rapidly during
the next two weeks, and then  remained  relatively  constant  throughout   the
remainder of the  incubation period.

      The total  soluble  nitrogen  content of samples whose liquid phase   was
replaced  with  distilled  water tended to increase slightly  as a  result of
incubation  indicating that mineralization was  slow in   that   system.    The
total soluble  nitrogen content   of  samples  amended with ammonium nitrate
increased significantly during the  first three weeks  of  incubation and then
STUDY RESULTS

-------
                                                                       219
                                  TABLE 91
   Effect of Ammonium Nitrate Addition on the Concentration of Soluble N
Incubation

Treatment

De ionized
Water*



None




1500 g N
added



6000 g N
added



time
(weeks)

0
1
3
6
12
0
1
3
6
12
0
1
3
6
12
0
1
3
6
12
Concentration
of soluble
Amm.-N


0.26
0.21
0.14
0.20
0.17
0.54
1.15
0.21
0.22
0.10
4.36
4.34
0.19
0.22
0.32
18.12
18.92
0.22
0.24
0.22
Nit.-N


0.28
0.11
0.80
0.93
0.80
2.88
2.97
4.36
4.84
4.77
7.14
7.88
13.33
13.34
13.22
21.64
22.89
43.06
43.20
42.95
Change in concentration
of soluble inorganic N
during incubation
_ _TYlf"T ~\
mg/i -
_
-0.21
0.40
0.58
0.44
_
0.72
1.17
1.66
1.64
—
0.71
2.00
2.05
2.03
_
2.14
3.60
3.86
3.50
*  Entire liquid phase of sample replaced with deionized water,
remained relatively constant for the remainder of the 12 week period.   The
net amounts of inorganic nitrogen formed during 12 weeks of incubation were
66, 246, 305,  and  525  yg  per  sample  for  samples  with  liquid  phase
replacement,  no  treatment,  addition of 1500  g nitrogen, and addition of
6000 yg with liquid phase replacement  as  compared  to  untreated  samples
suggests  that  a  portion  of  the nitrogen mineralized is soluble organic
nitrogen which was lost when the liquid phase  was  removed.   The  finding
that  more nitrogen is mineralized in samples treated with ammonium nitrate
than in untreated samples suggests that a  "priming  effect"  of  inorganic
nitrogen on mineralization may be significant in aquatic systems.

     From the data collected during the incubation of  the  stream  samples
under  various environmental conditions, it can be concluded that there are
both long-term and short-term transformations occurring which influence the
amounts and forms of nitrogen and phosphorus found in the solution phase.

     Short-term transformations appear to be sorption or desorption of both
organic  and  inorganic  phosphorus  and  possibly  the  release  of sorbed
phosphorus from soil minerals and dissolution  of  phosphorus  occluded  in
                                                                 RESULTS

-------
   220
 iron and aluminum.  The short-term transformations influencing the nitrogen
 and organic phosphorus contents of water are much more dependent  upon  the
 factors  affecting  microbial  growth  since  transformations  are  largely
 carried out by microorganisms.  Microbiological transformations  may  occur
 in  very short periods of time if conditions are favorable for organisms or
 long periods when conditions are  unfavorable.   The  short-term  processes
 involving  inorganic  phosphorus transformations are more physiochemical in
 nature and therefore not so dependent on environmental factors.

      The  long-term  processes  involved   in   nitrogen   and   phosphorus
 transformations  in  water  systems  are likely to be the mineralization of
 organic nitrogen and phosphorus components in solution and in the sediment.
 Based on data obtained in this study, mineralization processes appear to be
 major long-term processes leading to higher soluble nitrogen and phosphorus
 concentrations in incubated samples.

      The  soluble  inorganic  phosphorus  concentration  in  most   samples
 increased  slowly  with time during the incubation period.  It appears this
 increase  in  soluble  inorganic  phosphorus  was   due   mainly   to   the
 mineralization  of  soluble  and  sediment  organic phosphorus.  During the
 mineralization  process  the  sorption-desorption  process   controls   the
 equilibrium obtained between the sediment and solution.

      In aquatic systems amended with calcium carbonate the concentration of
 total  soluble  phosphorus  remained  relatively  constant  indicating that
 calcium  carbonate  may  decrease  mineralization   of   sediment   organic
 phosphorus.   Increased  content of dissolved oxygen and shaking of samples
 increased the concentration of soluble inorganic phosphorus  and  decreased
 the  concentration  of  organic  phosphorus.   The  overall  effect  was an
 increase in total soluble phosphorus during the incubation.

      Addition  of  inorganic  phosphorus  to   samples   released   organic
 phosphorus  into  solution most likely by replacement of organic phosphorus
 compounds sorbed on soil colloid surfaces by  added  inorganic  phosphorus.
 The  total  soluble  phosphorus  content  of samples treated with inorganic
 phosphorus decreased during the 12  week  period  indicating  that  soluble
 organic  phosphorus  was sorbed by the sediments.  The samples in which the
 solution was replaced by deionized water were unable to attain the original
 concentration  of  inorganic phosphorus by desorption processes and part of
 the soluble organic phosphorus present in the liquid phase  was  sorbed  by
 the sediment.

      A  33  degree  C  incubation  temperature  increased   the   rate   of
 mineralization   of  phosphorus  and  increased  the  final  total  soluble
 phosphorus concentration by a significant amount.  A 5 degree C  incubation
 temperature decreased the rate of mineralization of organic phosphorus.

      The treatments applied which  would  increase  microbial  growth  also
 enhanced  the  mineralization  of  nitrogen  and  as  a  final  result  the
 concentration of nitrate-nitrogen in solution increased.  Aeration, calcium
 carbonate  amendment,  increased  temperature  and the addition of ammonium
 nitrate all had positive effects on the mineralization of nitrogen and  the
 final  total  soluble  inorganic  nitrogen  concentration.  Low temperature
 seemed to have the greatest negative effect on the concentration of soluble
 inorganic  nitrogen,  but  there  were  still  increases  in  the  solution
 concentration over the 12 week incubation period.

STUDY RESULTS

-------
                                                                          221

 4.11 ALGAL STUDIES

 4.11.1 Introduction

      The importance of  phosphorus  contamination  of  natural  waters  has
 received  an  enormous  amount  of attention in past years.   One reason for
 this  amount  of  investigation  has  been  the  "algal  bloom"  effect  of
 increasing  phosphorus  additions  to  water which normally  did not contain
 concentrations of phosphorus capable of supporting excessive photosynthetic
 biomass.    The   short-term  effects  of  an  algal  bloom   range  from  a
 degeneration in the  quality  of  drinking  water  by  algal  exudates  and
 physical  fouling  of  water  treatment  facilities,  to  the impairment of
 enjoyment of recreational  waters  by  odorous   decomposition  of  senesced
 cells,  direct inducement  of fish kills,  and depletion of aquatic aesthetic
 value.  The long-term effect of an  algal  bloom  is  the acceleration  of
 eutrophication.

      The dissolved orthophosphate ion is  the most available  form  of  P  to
 algae  (Vollenweider,   1970).    However,   in the  past,   the comparison of
 chemical analysis of orthophosphate to algal availability of  the  ion  has
 given  variable  results.    Therefore, the determination of  algal available
 soluble P is the only dependable method of ensuring knowledge  of  a  water
 sample's potential for supporting biomass.   The most frequently used method
 for  accurately determining available soluble P  is the algal  bioassay method
 developed   by  the  U.  S.   Environmental   Protection  Agency  called  the
 Provisional Algal Assay Procedure Bottle  Test (PAAP).   (1971).

      In lake systems the amount of  soluble  orthophosphate   in  the  water
 phase is a function of the equilibrium between  the inorganic P bound on the
 sediment and the interstitial  dissolved inorganic P (Syers  et  al,  1973).
 Dissolved  inorganic  P can,  therefore,  be released to the  overlying  water
 column when the  concentration  of interstitial dissolved inorganic P exceeds
 that  in  the water  column.    Because of  the  dynamic  equilibrium existing
 between sediment and solution,  the sediment of  a lake  system is  ultimately
 a  P  reservoir   capable  of  replenishing   inorganic  P taken up by aquatic
 organisms.

      Sediments normally contain  large   quantities  of   amorphous,   hydrated
 iron  oxides capable   of  sorbing   P.  Sorbed  P in sediments is capable  of
 mobility within  the  system and  rapidly sorbing  or  desorbing  in  response  to
 small   changes   in  P concentration.  Therefore,  the potential  for  P release
 in response to uptake within the  system is of   importance  and   in  essence
 will dictate  the  quantity  of supportable biomass.

     Determination of  the  fraction of  sediment  P available to algae  is  very
 difficult.    Although  dialysis   systems  have   been  used in the  past  with
 limited  success,  a method developed by Sagher and  Harris   (1975)   incubates
 algal cells  intimately with sediment and enables  the determination  sediment
 P fraction capable of supplying P  for  algal   uptake.   The  Sagher-Harris
method was  selected  for use  in this study.

     The objectives of this study were:

     1.  TO determine the availability to algae of  soluble  and   sediment-
                                                           STUDY  RESULTS

-------
222

 bound P in water samples collected from the Black Creek watershed, and

      2.  To determine the sediment P fraction  (ammonium flouride, NaOH, and
 HC1 extractable) of sediment-bound P which is most available to algae.

 4.11.2 Materials and Methods

 4.11.2.1 PAAP BOTTLE TEST

      An algal bioassay was conducted to determine the available portion  of
 soluble P in water samples obtained from seven sites within the Black Creek
 watershed on March 28 and June 30, 1977.  The bioassay method used was  the
 PAAP Bottle Test (USEPA, 1971).  The method finds its roots in Liebig's Law
 of the Minimum which states that "growth is limited by substance that is in
 minimal  quantities  in  respect to the needs of the organism." That is, if
 one nutrient is lacking, the organism's limit for  growth   (in  this  case,
 reproduction)   is  determined  by  parameters set by the amount of limiting
 nutrient.  Therefore, the PAAP method used created a reference curve  which
 related  the  number  of  cells   (or  growth  rate)  of  a test alga to the
 concentration of the nutrient being tested, phosphorus,  in  an  inoculated.
 growth  medium  in  which no other factor is limiting.  The cell numbers of
 the inoculated water sample were determined and  the  numbers  compared  to
 those  found  in  the  reference  medium  to  ascertain  the  corresponding
 concentration of available P.  In addition  to  inoculating  the  unamended
 water  samples,  three  additional  treatments  were used to attempt a more
 complete evaluation of limiting nutrients in Black  Creek  drainage  water.
 The  treatments  used were  (1) a P spike of 0.1 mg/1 to ensure that P would
 not be limiting maximal cell reproduction,  (2) a micronutrient spike  equal
 to  that  found in the PAAP reference medium to measure the response of the
 test organism to added micronutrients, and  (3) a combination spike  of  0.1
 mg  P/l  plus micronutrients equal to that found in the reference medium in
 order to create a non-limiting growth medium.

      The bioassay was conducted in a 250 ml Erlenmeyer flask containing  60
 ml  of  the  PAAP  medium or the water sample.  The standard PAAP reference
 medium contained between 0.0 and 0.2 mg P/l  (0.000,  0.005,  0.015,  0.050,
 0.075,  0.100,  0.200  mg  P/l).  Cell counts were made initially and at 24
 hour intervals  until a constant, positive relationship existed between cell
 numbers and  P concentration  (after three days of incubation for all studies
 conducted) at which time the cell densities  of  inoculated  water  samples
 were  counted   and the available P concentration determined by reference to
 the standard growth curve.

 4.11.2.2 AVAILABILITY OF SEDIMENT-BOUND P

      In determining the biologically available sediment-bound  P,  studies
 were  conducted on the amounts of sediment-bound P sequentially extractable
 with ammonium  flouride, NaOH, and HC1  before  and  after   incubating  with
 algal  cells  for  two weeks under optimum growth conditions.  Decreases in
 extractable  P  in sediments  resulting from  incubation  were  assumed  to  be
 that  P   immobilized  into cells during algal growth.  All sediment P values
 were corrected  for the  amounts  of  algal  P  in  the  system  which  were
 extracted during the  sequential extraction procedure.

      All  sediment bioassay  studies were carried out  in  250 ml   Erlenmeyer
 flasks  using   60  ml  of   standard  medium  containing  sufficient sterile


 STUDY RESULTS

-------
                                                                       223
 sediment to  provide  0.62 mg  P/l.   Flasks were  inoculated   with  Selenastrum
 capricornutum  (10,000/ml),   incubated  at  24 degrees C  for  2 and 4 weeks,
 cell  densities determined, and  the entire  contents of duplicate flasks were
 subjected to sequential extraction and  P determination.

 4.11.3 Results and Discussion.

 4.11.3.1 AVAILABILITY OF SOLUBLE  P

      A study was  conducted to   determine  the   availability  of  soluble
 phosphorus  to   algae  in  water   samples  from seven sites within the Black
 Creek watershed.  The method employed was  a  modification  of the Provisional
 Algal Assay  Procedure Bottle Test (USEPA,  1971) to provide a  rapid assay of
 available soluble P.

      S.  capricornutum exhibited  a  typical  sigmoid  growth   rate  in  the
 reference medium  at  P  concentrations   of  0.05  mg/1   or   greater.   The
 stationary phase of  growth began  after  96  hours   of  incubation  for   all
 treatments,   but    at   lower  cell densities for  each decrease  in  P
 concentration.

      The reference curves produced by plotting cell numbers after three  or
 four   days  versus   initial   P  concentration   gives a leveling off of  cell
 numbers  at P concentrations  greater than 0.1 mg/1.   The leveling off above
 0.1   mg   P/l may  be  looked  upon within  the experimental  system as the
 critical level of P  or that  concentration  at   which  nearly  maximum  cell
 production takes place.

      Table 92 presents concentrations of   soluble   inorganic   P  (SIP)   and
 total  soluble  P   (TSP)  analytically  determined  in the March and  June
 samples, as  well as  the amount  of available  P detected   by   the  bioassay
 using cell   counts  as the  determinative  criteria in amended  and unamended
 samples.   In all but one sample,  the quantity of  soluble orthophosphate
 determined  by  chemical  analysis was greater in  March as compared to  June
 samples.

      The same trends were  observed for   the   quantity   of TSP  in water
 samples.

      Also indicated  is the fact that in no  case   did the quantity of  P
 determined  as  available  by  the  bioassay procedure exceed  that detected
 chemically as SIP.   Tne chemical  analysis  of  SIP,   therefore,   detected  P
 components  which  were  unavailable to S_. capricornutum  in unamended water
 samples  during three to four  days   of  incubation.    These components   may
 soluble  polyphosphates or hydrolyzable organic P esters.

      The available P detected in  the unamended samples averaged  0.096  mg/1
 (nearly maximal biomass production)  in March samples  and  0.033 mg/1  in June
 samples  (indicating  cell production was   limited   by P).   Tne   range   in
 available  P was 0.076 to 0.128 mg P/l and  0.012  to  0.049 mg P/l  for March
 and June  samples, respectively.

     Results of March samples receiving the  P  spike seem  to  bear  out   the
 fact  that P was not limiting cell  production.   However, data from  the June
 samples  indicate a response to P addition, but  in most cases cell densities
did  not   reach  maximal  values observed  in reference curves.  The  finding


                                                           STUDY RESULTS

-------
 224
                                  TABLE 92
        Availability to Algae of Soluble Phosphorus in Stream Water
P Concentration Available P in Water Samples as

Site #

March:
2
3
4
5
6
12
14
Ave
June:
2
3
4
5
6
12
14
Ave
in Water
SIP



.106
.121
.121
.171
.259
.135
.131
.149

.069
.038
.045
.053
.072
.047
.161
.069
TSP



.123
.150
.139
.173
.280
.153
.148
.166

.100
.063
.075
.072
.091
.062
.190
.093
Determined from Cell Count Bioassy of:*
U



.080
.076
.116
.128
.102
.086
.083
.096

.035
.016
.033
.040
.045
.012
.049
.033
P

^g F/TQl -

.084
.044
.098
.106
.068
.068
.094
.080

.018
.036
.042
.080
.099
.081
.045
.048
MN



094
106
116
099
096
116
132
108

041
019
043
046
044
020
257
067
PMN



.090
—
—
_
.081
_
_
.085

.061
—
.088
_
.085
.032
—
.066
   U, unamended water sample; P, water sample spiked
   with 0.1 mg P/l; MN, water spiked with micronutrients;
   PMN, water samples spiked with phosphorus (0.1 mg P/l)
   and micronutrients.
could be an indication that another nutrient was limiting algal growth.

     The averages of the March and June samples spiked with  micronutrients
gave  growth  responses over both the unamended and P spiked samples.  That
is, the organisms incubated in the water sample were able to utilize more P
as  a result of being supplied with additional micronutrients.  This growth
stimulation from micronutrient addition occurred in  four  of  seven  March
samples and two of the seven June samples.

     The P plus micronutrient spike gave positive growth responses in  five
of  six  samples  treated,  but  in no case was the available P detected by
bioassay equal to the 0.1 mg  P/l  added.   This  is  an  indication  of  a
limiting concentration of micronutrients or P, or both, which upon adding P
and  micronutrients  disappeared  until  growth  was  limited  by   another
nutrient.

     A comparison was made  (Table 93) between amounts of available  soluble
P  detected  by bioassay in water samples from groups of sites which differ
in their land use characteristics.  In the  March  sample,  the  soluble  P
determined  by  bioassay  to  be  available was greatest in the rural-urban
STUDY RESULTS

-------
                                                                       225
 portion of the watershed.   The June samples showed the greatest available P
 concentration  in  samples  collected  from  the rural-urban portion of the
 watershed and the Maumee River.
                                  TABLE 93
 Variation of Available Soluble Phosphorus  by Adjoining  Land  Use Characteristics
 Site #
    2
    3
    4
  Ave
    5
    6
  Ave
   12


   14

 *Ave
      Sampling Time
    March        June
Available Soluble P(yg/l)

      Rural Portion
     .080       .035
     .076       .016
     .116       .033
     .091       .028

   Rural-Urban Portion
     .128       .040
     .102       .045
     .115       .042

    Entire Watershed
     .086       .012

      Maumee River
     .083       .049
     .096
.033
  Includes available soluble P from all sites sampled.
 4.11.3.2 AVAILABILITY OF SEDIMENT-BOUND P

     A study was conducted to evaluate the availability  of  sediment-bound
 phosphorus  to  algae  in  suspended  sediments  collected from seven sites
 within the Black  Creek  watershed.   A  modified  version  of  the  method
 developed  by  Sagher  and  Harris   (1975)  was employed.  This method is a
 combination chemical and biological assay which fractionates the forms  and
 quantities  of available P present.  Only data from the two week incubation
 time is reported.

     The proportion of total sediment P  immobilized  by  algae  from  each
 sample  during  a  two week incubation and the final density in each sample
 are shown in Table 94.  In March samples  an  average  of  18.1%  of  total
 sediment  P  was  available to algae and the range in availability was from
 10.5 to 27.7%.  The available P in the June samples averaged 21.1%  of  the
 total sediment P with a range from 10.5 to 30.0%.  These results tend to be
higher than some other previously measured  values  (Wildung  and  Schmidt,
 1973)  and lower than others (Sagher and Harris, 1975).

     Table 95 presents the final cell densities and the available  P  as  a
percent  of  the  sediment inorganic P (Pi)  after incubation for two weeks.
                                                          STUDY RESULTS

-------
 226
                                 TABLE  94
           Proportion of  Sediment Phosphorus  Immobilized by Cells


Site #
2
3
4
5
6
12
14
Ave

Cell
Density
xl 0-6 A»l
8.529
9.599
4.242
5.225
6.500
-
-
6.819
Sampling
March
Available P
as % of Total
14.7
19.4
10.5
27.7
20.6
-
-
18.6
Time
Cell
Density
xlO-6A»l
5.175
8.551
5.954
5.000
6.591
5.900
8.408
6.511
June
Available P
as % of Total
10.5
20.2
16.8
16.6
29.0
24.6
30.0
21.1
The averages of the March versus June samples show an  increase  (26.9  vs.
33.1%,  respectively)  in  the  percent  of  sediment  Pi  of  which become
available after two weeks of  incubation.   This  suggests  that  a  higher
percentage  of  sediment  Pi is available to algae during storm events with
low sediment transport (June sample)  as compared  to  more  intense  storms
with more soil erosion.
                                  TABLE 95
          Proportion of Sediment Inorganic Phosphorus Immobilized
Sampling Time
March

Site #

2
3
4
5
6
12
14
Ave
Cell
Density
xlO-6/ml
8.529
9.599
4.242
5.225
6.500
-
—
6.819
Available P
as % of Pi

26.6
27.9
15.0
34.7
30.7
-
-
26.9
June
Cell
Density
x!0-6A»l
5.175
8.551
5.954
5.000
6.591
5.900
8.408
6.511
Available
as % of

26.7
29.0
34.1
31.1
37.7
32.7
40.9
33.1
P
Pi









     The average proportions of Pi to become available are  again  slightly
higher  than  Wildung  and  Schmidt  (1973) reported in lake sediments.  The
percentage of the total available P derived from each inorganic Pi fraction
is presented in Table 96.
 STUDY  RESULTS

-------
                                                                            227
                                  TABLE 96
Proportion Immobilized by Cells Originating from Certain Extractable Fractions
Sampling Times
March
Inorganic P Fraction
Extracted By

Site #

2
3
4
5
6
12
14
Ave
Available
P
pg P/flask
3.45
4.70
2.62
6.84
4.84
-
-
4.49

Amm.F
% of
33.1
43.7
22.9
36.6
52.0
-
-
37.7

NaOH
Available
39.2
47.0
0
38.8
40.7
-
-
33.1

HC1
Pi
27.7
9.3
77.0
24.5
7.2
-
-
29.1
Available
P
y g P/flask
4.03
4.54
4.63
3.73
8.21
6.51
6.40
5.44
June
Inorganic P Fraction
Extracted By

Amm.F
% of
73.3
28.2
32.5
51.6
43.6
32.4
61.8
46.2

NaOH
Available
7.0
36.6
67.5
48.2
39.0
49.4
28.0
40.8

HC1
Pi
20.6
35.1
0
0
13.6
18.2
10.2
14.0
     On an average, in both March and June samples, the highest  proportion
 (37.7  and  46.2%,  respectively)  of  the  available  Pi originated in the
ammonium flouride extractable fraction (range was 22.9 to 57.0%,  and  28.2
to 73.3% respectively).  Ranking second in availability is NaOH extractable
fraction which contributed an average of 33.1% and 40.8% of  the  available
Pi  in  March and June samples, respectively.  The HC1 extractable fraction
also contributed to available P in both the March and  June  samples  (29.1
and  14.0%  respectively).   This finding suggests that all Pi fractions in
sediment are at least partially available to algae, however,  the  aluminum
and iron bound P fractions (ammonium flouride and NaOH extractable) seem to
be the most important.

  ,   Table 97 compares the proportion of Pi which becomes  available  after
two  weeks in sediments from sites with differing land use characteristics.
There was a higher proportion of Pi which was available in the samples from
the  rural-urban  portion  of  the  watershed as compared to those from the
rural portion (over 9% greater in  March  and  4%  in  June  samples).   In
addition,  the  highest proportion of available Pi was observed in the June
samples taken from the Maumee River site.  Most of the  available  sediment
Pi originated in the ammonium flouride extractable fraction (Table 95).

4.11.4 Conclusions

4.11.4.1 AVAILABILITY OF SOLUBLE PHOSPHORUS

     To study the availability of soluble P to algae a modification of  the
PAAP  Bottle Test was used and provided a consistent, positive relationship
between cell numbers and P concentration.

     The soluble P determined  as  available  by  bioassay  for  all  sites
sampled  and  both  sampling  times  was  always  less  than  that measured
chemically as SIP and TSP.  Algal growth in June samples was limited by low
                                                            STUDY  RESULTS

-------
 228
                                  TABLE  97
        Variation in Sediment Inorganic  P Immobilized by Source of  P
Site #


2
3
4
Ave

5
6
Ave

12

14
*Ave
Sampl ing
March
Available P as
Rural Portion
26.6
27.9
15.0
23.2
Rural-Urban Portion
34.7
30.7
32.7
Entire Watershed
-
Maumee River
-
26.9
Time
June
% of inorg.P

26.7
29.0
34.1
29.9

31.1
37.7
34.4

32.7

40.9
33.1
 * Includes values available from all  sites.
 concentrations of available P,  but in most cases some  nutrient  or   factor
 other  than  P  or  micronutrients  also  limited growth.   In addition,  the
 rural-urban portion of the watershed contained  higher levels of available P
 than did the rural portion in both March and  June sampling  periods.

 4.11.4.2 AVAILABILITY TO ALGAE

      Algal growth was shown to  be limited by  P  in treatments in  which   the
 sediment  was  the  sole source of P.   However, the  sediments did supply in
 most cases sufficient P to support substantial  growth of S.   capricornutum.
 The  proportion of total sediment P which became available  in the March  and
 June samples were 18.6 and 21.1%, respectively, and  the proportion   of   Pi
 which  became  available  was  26.9  and  33.1%, respectively.   The  largest
 portion of the available P originated in the  ammonium flouride  extractable
 fraction,  while  both the NaOH and HC1 extractable  fraction contributed to
 the total available P pool.  Sediments from the rural-urban portion  of   the
 watershed  had higher proportions of the Pi available for algae as compared
 to agricultural portions.  Maumee River sediment  from the  June sampling
 displayed the highest (40.9%) proportion of Pi  as available to algae.

                                  References
 United States Environmental  Protection Agency.    1971.    Provisional  Algal
STUDY RESULTS

-------
                                                                          229
 Assay  Procedure:    Bottle  Test.   Washington, D.C. Eutrophication Research
 Program.

 Volleneweider,  R.A.   1970.  Scientific Fundamentals of  the  Eutrophication
 of  Lakes  and   Flowing  Waters,  With Particular Reference to Nitrogen and
 Phosphorus  as   Factors  in  Eutrophication.    Organizations  for  Economic
 Cooperation and Development, Paris.

 Syer, J.K., R.E. Harris,  and D.  E.  Armstrong.   1973.   Phosphate  Chemistry
 in Lake Sediments.   Journal of Environmental Quality.   2* 1-13.

 Sagher, A.  and  R. Harris.  1975.  Availability of  Sediment  Phosphorus  to
 Microorganisms.   Water Resources  Center (Also Technical Report WIS WRC 75-
 01),  Madison, Wisconsin.

 Wildung,  R.E. and  R.L.  Schmidt.    1973.   Phosphorus  Release  from  Lake
 Sediments.   Office of Research and Monitoring.  United States Environmental
 Protection Agency  (EPA-660/3-73-015).


 4.12  STUDIES OF MAUMEE BASIN

      The  annual precipitation for  the  Maumee River   Basin  and  the  annual
 sediment   yield  and   discharge  from  the Maumee River into Lake Erie for  a
 ten-year  period, October  1961 to October 1972, are  presented in  Table 98.


                                  TABLE 98
          10-Year Annual Precipitation  Sediment Yield and Discharge
Precipitation* Discharge
Year
1970-71
1969-70
1968-69
1967-68
1966-67
1965-66
1964-65
1963-64
1962-63
1961-62
Average
(mm)
739
898
938
980
835
807
826
716
656
683
808
(mm over basin)
198
267
320
345
348
181
196
150
109
186
230
Ratio of Discharge
to Precipitation (%)
27
30
34
35
42
22
24
21
17
27
28
Sediment
Yield (kg/ha)
304
609
662
989
763
202
516
427
159
323
495
*Average of three locations:  Fort Wayne, Defiance and Toledo.
This table is based on data provided by the U.S.
Environmental Data Service and the U.S. Geological
Survey.
     The annual precipitation for the 10-year period seems to  be  part  of
some  cyclical  pattern.  Less than normal precipitation occurred from 1961
to 1966 and above normal precipitation from 1967 to 1971.  The  years  with
the  highest  precipitation  had  the  highest  runoff and also the highest

                                                              STUDY RESULTS

-------
 230


percentage of precipitation occurring as runoff.   As  a  consequence,  the
average  annual  sediment yield for the last five years was 665 kg/ha, more
than twice the 325 kg/ha yield for the first five years.

     Monthly precipitation patterns at Fort Wayne in the  western  part  of
the  Maumee  River Basin, at Defiance in central part, and at Toledo in the
eastern part near the mouth of the river are shown in  Figure  31  for  the
ten-year  period.   Low  precipitation months are October, February and for
the growing season, August.  High precipitation months are  usually  April,
May, June and July.

     The average monthly discharge of the Maumee River  given  as  a  depth
over  the basin and the sediment yield on an area basis are shown in Figure
32.

     Comparison of the monthly patterns of  discharge  and  sediment  yield
shows  a  disproportionally  high  sediment  yield  occurring  in December.
Usually  the  first  winter  storm  of  any  magnitude   carries   a   high
concentration  of sediment.  The winter storms are generally frontal storms
which may be basin-wide.  Much of the sediment is already deposited in • the
channels or lower portions of slopes from localized, convective-type storms
which occurred in the spring and early summer months.  While the  intensity
of  the  localized  storms  may  be  high,  they often do not have an areal
coverage which is great enough to  cause  significant  flow  in  the  major
streams  of the basin.  During the six-month period, June through November,
only 16 percent of the total flow and  8  percent  of  the  sediment  yield
occurred  for the 10-year period.  On the other hand, the six-month period,
December through May, had 84 percent and 92 percent of the total  flow  and
sediment yield, respectively.

     In general, those months with the highest discharge or runoff are also
the  months with the highest sediment yield.  For the years with relatively
high precipitation, the highest sediment yield usually occurs  in  December
or  early  January or later in February and early March; for the years with
low precipitation, the highest sediment yields are likely to occur in March
or April.

     The average annual sediment yield of nearly 500 kg/ha from the  Maumee
River   into   Lake  Erie   is  not   large when compared to many  river basins.
However, considering the  special nature of  the  receiving  body  of  water
yields  of   this  magnitude  may still have a detrimental  impact.  Although
 this yield  is caused by much larger  field erosion rates,   these  rates  may
yet  be  within  the natural restoration limits of most of the basin  soils.
The sediment load  also consists mostly of suspended particles  with  a  high
colloidal   fraction.  Streams  in  the basin  tend  to remain murky even during
 low flow.  And sediment plumes often extend 60  km or more  into Lake Erie.

 4.12.1  Sources of  Sediment

     The major sources of sediment  from  agricultural  watersheds  in   the
 Maumee  Basin are cultivated fields which are subject  to rainfall  impact  and
 runoff  turbulence.   Ditch bank sloughing   and   channel   scouring  probably
 account for  less than  five percent of  the total sediment  load. Tile  drains
 in some sections of  the   Maumee   Basin have  been   reported   to  discharge
 substantial   amounts of  sediments into ditches  or  streams.   However,  in  the
 Black  Creek Watershed, only about one  to  two percent of the  total   sediment

 STUDY RESULTS

-------
                                                                   231
120

100
| 80
Z
560
£
5 40
LU
tr
Q_
20
0

FT. WAYNE

































































































































120

100
| 80
Z
o
P 60
2
0 tO
LU
or
a.
20
0

DEFIANCE













































•>•!••
























MM

















































• —










        ONDJFMAMJJAS
ONDJFMAMJJAS
i<:u
100
£ 80
I"
540
LU
o:
CL
20
o












TOLEDO


















• • — •_-














_


PRECIPITATION (mm)
        ONDJFMAMJJAS
IOJ
100
80
60
40
20
0
AVERAGED FT. WAYNE,
DEFIANCE $ TOLEDO






._.

—
—




__




—



—




— :



—



- —







_..

ONDJFMAMJJAS
Figure 31. Monthly Precipitation  Pattern — Fort Wayne,  Defiance, Toledo
                                                       STUDY  RESULTS

-------
 232
   60
   50
to
o
UJ
O
or

x
o
c/5
Q
tr
<
or
UJ
   30
    10
    o
                                         150
                                       -125
                                        o>
                                          50
                                       UJ
Q 25
UJ
      ONDJFMAMJJAS
                                             ONDJFMAMJJAS
       (a)  Average monthly discharge  (left) and sediment yield  (right)
71
70
69
68
67
66
65
64
63
62
2
2
1
1
-
6
-
-
1
2
4
12
3
3
7
3
1
1
1
5
9
4
9
25
32
15
1
-
1
2
3
3
27
7
4
13
7
2
1
18
30
14
15
17
II
8
16
1
2
14
21
16
5
9
21
12
31
28
58
44
4
24
15
8
II
8
30
49
17
6
15
15
II
13
10
22
8
9
4
4
8
3
6
9
2
3
2
7
8
2
2
4
6
4
1
7
1
1
4
1
1
2
1
3
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
-
1
2
-
1
1
71
70
or 69
UJ 68
>-67

-------
                                                                      233
yield  originates  from  tile drainage  systems.  Even  though yields  from   tile
drains  are   relatively  small,  it should be pointed out  that  the  discharged
sediments  are mostly colloidal  and are delivered  directly  to  ditches or
streams  for  ready transport.

     The  potential  for rainfall   and  field  runoff   to  cause  erosion
correlates  closely with a statistic consisting of  the product value of two
rainstorm  characteristics, namely, the total kinetic energy of a  storm   and
its maximum  30-minute  intensity.  This statistic, called the  erosion index,
allows for comparisons of the annual erosion  potential of  rainfall   and
field  runoff between  different  regions and for  the determination of the
distribution of  the  annual   erosion  potential   within  a  region.    For
instance,  the  annual erosion  potential for the Maumee  River Basin is  only
one-fourth of the erosion potential  for lands in the United States near the
Gulf   of  Mexico.  Of  greater interest, however, is the  distribution of the
annual erosion potential for the Maumee River Basin.  The distribution,  in
general,   follows an  S-shaped  curve  in  which 80 per cent of  the annual
erosion  potential occurs in the five-month period,  May through September.

     May and  June are  particularly critical months  as far as  soil  erosion
is  concerned.    This  is the time when seed beds are prepared and new crops
established.  In  the Black Creek Watershed, over 70 percent of  the  annual
sediment  load  into the Maumee River occurred during these months in 1975.
For the  year, the total  sediment yield from the watershed  was  about   2400
kg/ha.   However,  1976  was an  abnormal year with very little runoff during
May and June.  Only about 2 percent  of the annual sediment  yield  occurred
during   these months  and quite predictably the sediment yield for 1976 was
low averaging about 500  kg/ha.

     The erosion-sedimentation process in a river basin  can,  in general, be
divided  into upland  and  in-channel phases.  The upland phase  is closely
related  to rainfall events and  the   nature  of  the receiving  land  area.
Major  variables  are  the degree of slope and slope length; surface cover;
soil type, tilth, and  water content; and the rainfall  pattern,   intensity,
duration,  and  amount.   Temperature  may also be  an important variable in
areas where a significant number of  freeze-thaw cycles occur.  Erosion  is a
selective  process.    Runoff  from   eroded  land  will   usually  contain  a
progressively higher percentage of smaller particles than the original  soil
mass.   The   in-channel  phase  is   little  influenced   by  rainfall and is
dependent mostly  on the  nature  of   the  bed  material   and   the  transport
capacity  of  the  flow.   In  this  phase,  the  channel  flow can usually
transport all the fine material supplied.

     The Black Creek Watershed is an upland area.   Sediment yield has  been
monitored  and  some portions of the watershed have been modeled.  However,
neither the actual or modeling results can be extended to the Maumee  Basin
as  a  whole.   On  a  long term basis, we might reasonably assume the major
streams  in the basin to be  in  dynamic  equilibrium  so  that  the  annual
sediment  discharged   into Lake Erie, except for man-made traps, equals the
average annual sediment yield from the upland areas into the main channels.
The average sediment yield into the main channels of the Maumee Basin might
be predicted  if more watersheds similar to the Black  Creek  Watershed  are
selected  so  that  the  soil,  topographic, and land use conditions of the
basin are adequately represented and then a  random  generation  of  storms
representative of an average year is applied to the Basin.

                                                         STUDY  RESULTS

-------
 234


4.13 CONSTRUCTION, LAND USE DIFFERENCES

     Two sets of data are included in this section.  The first  illustrates
water  quality  differences  arising  because of small scale differences in
land use.  The second shows the impact of construction activities on  water
quality.

     On 28 March 1977 four discrete watershed areas (3 at 100 acres,  1  at
500  acres)  of  the  Dreisbach  Drain  were  sampled  following a 1.5 inch
rainfall.  At  the  outlet  of  each  watershed,  four  grab  samples  were
collected at one-half hour intervals.  No estimates of discharge were made,
and only concentration data are reported here.  Samples  were  analyzed  by
the  Illinois  Natural  History Survey Laboratory.  General land use, soils
and slopes were as nearly  identical  as  could  be  expected  under  field
conditions.   However,  there  were  differences  in conservation practices
applied to the  four  areas:   watersheds  A  and  B  had  no  conservation
practices applied, watershed C was treated with an extensive terrace system
and the largest watershed, D, contained a grass waterway and a  variety  of
other practices, including terraces.

     Water quality parameters that differed significantly  among  the  four
watersheds are shown in Table 99.  Dissolved solids and nitrate were lowest
from watershed A, moderate from B and D, and  highest  from  C.   The  tile
outlet  of  the terrace system was enriched with dissolved ions and soluble
nitrogen.  Factors responsible for this observation may include the greater
leaching  of  soluble ions due to the subsurface tile drainage acting alone
or  in  combination  with  heavier  fertilizer  application   within   this
watershed.
                                  TABLE 99
                   Differing Parameters, Four Watersheds
Watershed
A
B
C
D
Dissolved
Solids
126 +- 4
185 +- 10
250 +- 7
170 +- 10
Nitrate
mg/1
2.2 4- 2.0
6.4 4- 1.1
8.8 +- .2
3.8 +- .5
Sediment
(Total Residue)
300 +- 65
1700 +- 458
700 4- 87
500 +- 71
     Sediment   (total  residue)  concentrations  also  were   lowest   from
watershed  A,  moderate  from C and D, and highest from watershed B.  Again
the factors responsible for these differences are  complex  and  cannot  be
precisely  identified.   In  this  situation other land use factors besides
conservation practices seemed to exert  the  greatest  influence  on  water
quality.   Watershed  A  had  a high percentage of cropland with vegetative
cover, including the field immediately upstream from  the  sampling  point,
and  had  the lowest sediment concentration.  Conversely, watershed B had a
lower percentage of cropland with vegetative cover, including a fall plowed
field  immediately  upstream  from  the sampling point, and had the highest
sediment concentrations.  The two watersheds  with  conservation  practices
installed  had  sediment  concentrations  between  these  two extremes.  To
STUDY RESULTS

-------
                                                                         235
conclude, this small data set illustrates differences in the concentrations
of  some  water quality parameters resulting from small differences in land
use.  Such data cannot establish cause-effect relationship between land use
and  water  quality,  but  are  useful  tests of the principles established
through more controlled experimentation.

     Ten discrete watershed areas (350-550 acres) were sampled on 3  March,
4  March, 28 March and 23 April, 1977.  At the outlet of each watershed two
samples were collected at two hour intervals on each of the sampling dates.
All  sampling  was  done during moderate runoff events caused by one to two
inches of  rainfall.   Again  only  concentration  data  are  reported  and
analysis  was  conducted by the Illinois Natural History Survey Lab.  Soils
and slopes differed considerably among the  ten  watersheds  while  general
land  use  and  application  of conservation practices differed to a lesser
degree.  All these watershed characteristics  certainly  influence  surface
runoff  water  quality,  so  an  evaluation  of  the interactions of such a
complex set of variables with a small data set is difficult.  However,  the
data  reveals  a striking parallel between high sediment concentrations and
recent construction activities  (jobs completed in September 1976).

     To   facilitate   an   easier   pair-wise   comparison   of   sediment
concentrations among the watersheds a sediment index was formed.  Watershed
1 was consistently assigned an index value of 1.00.  Index values for other
watersheds  (2-13)   were  formed by dividing the sediment concentrations of
watersheds 2-13 by the sediment concentration of  watershed  1.   This  was
done  separately  for  all  eight sampling intervals.  The average sediment
indexes and standard deviations of the ten watersheds are  shown  in  Table
100.   Well  established grass waterways tended to have the lowest sediment
indexes (1.0-1.6)  and therefore had relatively low sediment concentrations.
Stable  open  ditches  with  good  vegetative cover had higher index values
(1.6-3.0).
                                 TABLE 100
               Sediment Concentration  Indexes -  Subwatersheds
Watershed
Name
Dreisbach
Wertz
Richelderfer
West Gorrell
East Gorrell
Smith-Fry
Lake
Killian
Wertz Branch
Fuelling

No.
1
5
2
3
4
7
11
13
6
12
Channel
Classification
Grassed waterway
(upland)
Stable open ditch
(upland)
Stable open ditch
(lake bed)
Reconstructed open
ditch
Average
Sediment
Index
1.00
1.62
1.59
2.01
3.04
1.91
2.09
2.32
7.85
3.71

S. D.
0.00
0.40
0.30
0.30
1.19
0.65
0.53
1.36
3.33
1.71
                                                              STUDY RESULTS

-------
236
     The East Gorrell watershed had the highest sediment  index  among  the
stable  open  ditches.   It  is  significant to not that a major in-channel
erosion control structure (drop structure) washed out on this ditch in  the
spring of 1977.  Failure of this structure resulted in rapid erosion of the
upstream channel as the excessive grade  attempted  to  re-stabilize.   The
data  indicate  that  this process raised the sediment concentration of the
stream by 50% compared to the adjacent  West  Gorrell  drainage.   Recently
reconstructed open ditches with poor vegetative cover had the highest index
values (3.7, 7.9).  The ditch banks were an obvious source of sediment  and
the  sampling  reveals that in-stream sediment concentrations were elevated
4-8 times above the levels in  surrounding  streams.   The  large  sediment
export  from  the  Wertz Branch Ditch altered fish populations in the Wertz
Woods.

     It  is  generally  agreed   that   construction   activities   greatly
accelerates  soil  erosion.  Evaluating the degradation of water quality by
construction site runoff was not specifically addressed in the Black  Creek
project.    However,   in  a  grab  sampling  program  of  ten  watersheds,
construction associated disturbances  were  an  identifiable  influence  on
water  quality  (sediment  concentrations).   These findings raise concerns
about  temporary  negative  effects  on  water  quality  created   by   the
installation of some soil conservation measures.

     In the situations described above, the  post-construction  precautions
against  erosion  (seeding,  mulching,  etc.)  were  certified  to meet SCS
specifications.  However, an extremely  dry  fall  resulted  in  very  poor
vegetative  cover so that erosion was greater than normal.  Regardless, the
concerns about water quality degradation remain justified.  Both  near-site
and   downstream  changes  in  the  stream  ecology  could  damage  aquatic
resources.

     To  lessen  the  environmental   impact   of   conservation   practice
installation,  planners  and  field  technicians need to be aware of stream
reaches with aquatic resource potential.  In cases where aquatic  resources
are  judged worth protecting, more stringent precautions should be taken to
minimize construction damages.  Personnel training programs stressing basic
ecological  principles may be the shortest route to achieving maximum water
quality benefits from soil conservation practices.
DISCUSSION

-------
                                                                        237
5.1 IMPACT OF LAND TREATMENT
     The cost of land treatment in the Black Creek Watershed was not trivi-
al.
     Costs by practice are included in Table 101.   Total  costs  listed  in
the  table  include  contributions of individual landowners.   These totaled
nearly $150,000 for the project.

     Also included must be the cost of technical assistance furnished under
the  grant  by  the  Soil  Conservation Service.  Soil Conservation Service
costs are listed in Table 102.
                                 TABLE 101
                             Cost by Practice


PRACTICE
District Cooperators
Conservation Plans
Landowner-District Contracts
uroup Contracts
Land Adequately Treated
Land Adequately Protected
Conservation Cropping System
Contour Farming
Critical Area Planting
Crop Residue Management
u i ver s i ons
Farmstead Windbreaks
Field Border
Field Wi ndbreak
Grade Stabilization Structure
(Including tile outlet CMP)
Grassed Waterway
Holding Ponds it Tanks
Land Smoothing
Livestock Exclusion
Livestock Watering Facility
Minimum Till age
Pasture Management
Pasture Planting
Pon.l
Protection Burins Developnent
Recreation Area Improvement
Sediment Control Basins
Stream Channel Stabilization
Streahbank Protection
St r i pcropp i ng
Surface D ra i ns
Terraces
Tile Drains
Tree PI an t i n^
Wildlife Habitat Management
Woodland Improved Harvesting
Woodland Improvement
Woodland Pruning
TOTAL (WATERSHED)


UMIT
No
Ho
No
Ho
Ac
Ac
Ac
Ac
Ac
Ac
Ft
Ac
Ft
Ft
!Jo

Ac
ilO
Ac
Rd
;io
Ac
Ac
Ac
.'In
Ac
Ac
Mo
Ft
Ft
Ac
Ft
Ft
Ft
Ac
Ac
Ac
Ac
Ac
Ac


GOAL
148
170
148

10,573

7, 'tis
7G9
10
7,491
39,200
75
288,370
12,003
3G8

C8
11
300
2,050
28
7 , D 5 G
1(02
501
39
118
12
0
6,000
122,000
300
90,500
22,000
200,300
10
222
200
BIO
50
12,038

ACCOMP-
Ll SMMEHT
I'll
133
11D
19
7,975
10,025
G,5iiS
10
15
2,952
1,860
I*
132, CCS
0
51C

6U
10
0
15,8GQ
7
P8P
17
n:
10
li
10
J
IB, 093
D9,30lj
0
t
22
20
3
•?3
50
268
31
0
10
23 U
r-7
0
G7
9
0
0

TOTAL COST
( 1 nc 1 udes
Landowner Costs)






55,91(8
20
3,41(0
3,857
1,906
386
38,071
0
105,527

1(8,332
1(5,120
n
12,795
1,715
2,670
1 , !( 1 G
10,695
20,71(0
313
1,187
5,931
127,660
7S,CS2
0
3,71(1
39,031
152, 08G
0
1,952
0
0
0
$709.791
% OF
COST
SHARE






70
80
80
65
70
75
70
70
75

80
50
70
70
70
80
65
70
60
65
50
75'
80
70
SO
65
90
70
70
GO
65
70
70

HI STRICT
PAYMENT




518,876.59
513,876.59
i(,16it.OO
16.00
2,752.57
2,507.15
1,331(.81
289.79
26,G50.3C
0.00
79,11(5.91

38,666.21
22,560.09
0. 00
8,956.88
1,200.50
2,126.65
920.40
7,486.72
12,444.21
203.62
593.81
4,448.90
102,128.51
55,077.itO
0. 00
2,431.99
35,127.95
106,460.79
0.00
1,171.37
0.00
0.00
0.00
Av.$73 518,876.59
TOTAL
UMIT
COST






0.90
2.00
229.38
1.30
1.02
96.59
0.30
0. 00
294.51

755.19
4,512.91
0.00
0. 80
245.00
3.38
14.59
95.49
2,074.03
78.31
118.76
1,977.29
7.93
0.79
0.00
n.39
0. 75
1.13
0. 00
13.19
0.00
0. 00
0.00

DISTRICT
UNIT
COST




65.05
51.75
0.63
1.60
183.50
0.84
0.71
72.44
0.20
0.00
153.38

604.15
2,256.00
0. 00
0. 56
17l'.50
3.10
9.48
66.84
1,244.42
50.90
59.38
1,482.96
6.34
0.55
0. 00
0. 25
0.68
0. 79
0. 00
7. 91
0. 00
0. 00
0.00

                                                                 DISCUSSION

-------
238
                                  TABLE 102
                        Technical Assistance Cost SCS
Assistance
Professional
Subprofessional
Total
Planning time
Application time
Group application time
Cartographic
Soils Mechanics Lab
Travel and support
GRAND TOTAL
Hours
14,509
8,284
22,793
6,099
4,400
3,557




Dollars
$159,345.47
70,746.90
230,092.37*
44,736.44
33,677.28
29,639.92
1,223.53
1,761.75
2,147.35
235,225.00
 *Includes employee benefits and overhead.
      Costs for land treatment thus total nearly  $910,000  for  the  12,000
 acre Black Creek watershed.  The analysis of this cost and its relationship
 to the Black Creek watershed, the  Maumee  Basin,  and  other  agricultural
 watersheds is included in the next section.

 5.1.1 Analysis of Costs

      As previously stated, a total conservation approach to  any  watershed
 must involve more than a consideration of water quality.  The initial plan-
 ning for the Black Creek project listed 33 categories in  which  the  costs
 could be incurred for specific conservation practices.  These were outlined
 in Table A-10 of the initial work plan according  to  estimated  costs  per
 year.  Table A-10 is reproduced here as Table 101.

      The practices listed in Table 101 were described in detail in the work
 plan as follows:

 5.1.1.1 CONSERVATION CROPPING SYSTEMS

      Growing crops in combination with needed cultural and management meas-
 ures.   Cropping systems include rotations that contain grasses and legumes
 as well as rotations in which the desired benefits are achieved without the
 use of such crops.

 5.1.1.2 CONTOUR FARMING

      Farming sloping cultivated land in such a way that  plowing  preparing
 and planting, and cultivating are done on the contour.   (This includes fol-
 lowing established grades of terraces, diversions, or contour strips.)
 DISCUSSION

-------
                                                                       239


5.1.1.3 CRITICAL AREA PLANTING

     Stabilizing silt-producing and severely eroded areas  by  establishing
vegetative  cover.   This  includes  woody plants, such as trees, shrubs or
vines, and adapted grasses or legumes established by seeding or sodding  to
provide long-term ground cover.  (Does not include tree planting mainly for
the production of wood products.)

5.1.1.4 CROP RESIDUE MANAGEMENT

     Using plant residues to protect cultivated fields during critical ero-
sion periods.

5.1.1.5 DIVERSIONS

     A channel with a supporting ridge on the lower side constructed across
the slope.

5.1.1.6 FARMSTEAD AND FEEDLOT WINDBREAKS

     A belt of trees or shrubs established next to a farmstead or feedlot.

5.1.1.7 FIELD BORDER PLANTING

     A border or strip of perennial vegetation established at the edge of a
field  by planting or by converting from trees or crop production to herba-
ceous vegetation or shrubs.

5.1.1.8 FIELD WINDBREAKS

     A strip or belt of trees or shrubs established to reduce wind erosion.

5.1.1.9 GRADE STABILIZATION STRUCTURE

     A structure to stabilize the grade or to control head cutting  in  na-
tural  or  artificial  channels.  (Does not include stream channel improve-
ment, streambank protection, diversion, or structure for water control.)

5.1.1.10 GRASSED WATERWAYS

     A natural or constructed waterway or outlet shaped or graded and esta-
blished  in  vegetation  suitable to safely dispose of runoff from a field,
diversion, terrace or other structure.

5.1.1.11 HOLDING PONDS AND TANKS

     A fabricated structure or one made by constructing a pit  dam  or  em-
bankment for temporary storage of animal or agricultural wastes, associated
runoff and waste water.

5.1.1.12 LAND SMOOTHING

     Removing irregularities on the land surface by use of  special  equip-
ment.
                                                               DISCUSSION

-------
 240


 5.1.1.13 LIVESTOCK EXCLUSION

     Excluding livestock from an area where grazing is not wanted.

 5.1.1.14 LIVESTOCK WATERING FACILITY

     A trough or tank with needed devices  for  water  control  to  provide
 drinking water for livestock.

 5.1.1.15 MINIMUM TILLAGE

     Limiting the number of cultural operations  to  only  those  that  are
 properly timed and essential to produce a crop and prevent soil damage.

 5.1.1.16 PASTURE AND HAYLAND MANAGEMENT

     Proper treatment and use of pastureland or hayland.

 5.1.1.17 PASTURE AND HAYLAND PLANTING

     Establishing and re-establishing long-term stands of  adapted  species
 of  perennial, biennial, or reseeding forage plants.  (Includes pasture and
 hayland renovation; does not include grassed waterway or  outlet  on  crop-
 land.)

 5.1.1.18 PONDS

     A water impoundment made by constructing a dam across  a  water-course
 or a natural basin, or by excavating a pit or "dugout".  (Such ponds do not
 include spring development or irrigation reservoirs.)

 5.1.1.19 PROTECTION DURING DEVELOPMENT

     Treatment based on a plan  to  control  erosion  and  sediment  during
development  for  residential,  commercial-industrial,  community services,
 transportation routes or utility uses.

 5.1.1.20 RECREATION AREA IMPROVEMENT

     Establishing grasses, legumes, vines, shrubs, trees, or  other  plants
or managing woody plants to improve an area for recreation.

 5.1.1.21 SEDIMENT CONTROL BASINS

     A barrier or dam constructed across a waterway or  at  other  suitable
 locations to form a silt or sediment basin.

 5.1.1.22 STREAM CHANNEL STABILIZATION

     Stabilizing the channel of a stream with suitable structures.

 5.1.1.23 5TREAMBANK PROTECTION

     Stabilizing and protecting banks  of  streams  or  excavated  channels
against scour and erosion by the use of vegetative or structural means.

DISCUSSION

-------
                                                                        241


 5.1.1.24 STRIPCROPPING

      Growing crops in a systematic  arrangement of strips or  bands  on  the
 contour to reduce erosion.

 5.1.1.25 SURFACE DRAINS

      A graded channel for collecting excess water  within  a  field.    This
 does not include grassed waterway or outlet.

 5.1.1.26 TERRACE, GRADIENT

      An earth embankment or  a  ridge  and   channel  constructed  across  the
 slope  at a suitable  opening and  an acceptable grade to reduce erosion dam-
 age  and pollution by  intercepting surface  runoff  and  conducting  it  to  a
 stable outlet.

 5.1.1.27 TERRACE, PARAT.T.FL

      An earth embankment or  a  ridge channel constructed in  parallel   across
 the   slope at a  suitable spacing  and acceptable grade to reduce erosion and
 pollution and provide a more farmable terrace  system.

 5.1.1.28 TILE DRAINS

      A conduit,  such  as tile,  pipe  or tubing,  installed beneath ground sur-
 face  and  which  collects and/or conveys  drainage  water.   The project goal
 was  approximately 200,300 lineal  feet needed only for  erosion and  sediment
 control of surface drains and  grassed waterways.

 5.1.1.29 TREE PLANTING

      Planting tree seedlings or cuttings.

 5.1.1.30 WILDLIFE HABITAT MANAGEMENT

      Retaining,  creating, or managing wildlife  habitat for  both upland  and
 wetland.

 5.1.1.31 WOODLAND IMPROVED HARVESTING

      Systematically removing some of  the merchantable  trees  from  an   imma-
 ture  stand  to improve  the conditions  for forest growth.

 5.1.1.32 WOODLAND IMPROVEMENT

      Improving woodland  by  removing  unmerchantable   or  unwanted   trees,
 shrubs  or vines.

 5.1.1.33 WOODLAND PRUNING

     Removing all or parts of selected branches from trees.


     The Black Creek project was an experimental project.  It was begun  as
an  attempt   to evaluate several practices.  Of an initial list of 32 prac-


                                                               DISCUSSION

-------
242


tices, previously described, 12 have been selected as best management prac-
tices.   These  are  listed in Table 103, along with total unit cost of in-
stallation.  These costs are based on the actual contracts awarded in Black
Creek.
                                 TABLE 103
                          Cost of BMP  Installation
Practice
Field Border
Holding Tanks
Sediment Basins
Contour Farming
Critical Area Planting
Crop Residue Management
Grassed Waterways
Livestock Exclusion
(fencing)
Reduced Tillage
Pasture Renovation
and Planting
Terraces

Unit
Mile
Each
Each
(1)
Acre
(2)
Acre
Foot

(3)

Acre
Foot of terrace
(with tile)
Cost
1,584
5,600
5,000
(1)
400
(2)
1,200
0.50

(3)

100
1.75

 (1) very little application in Black Creek Area or
    Maumee Basin.
 (2) can be applied by management techniques without
    additional cost.
 (3) considered only on soils where reduced tillage should not
    result in significant yield penalties.
     At the completion of the  project  new  estimates  were  made  of  the
amounts of each of these practices which should have been installed to meet
water quality goals.

     It should be emphasized that these amounts do not represent totals ac-
tually installed, but rather the amounts that should have been installed if
the designers of the project could have known the results  from  the  Black
Creek  project when it began.  In some cases the amount is greater than the
amount actually applied.   These  amounts  as  estimated  for  Black  Creek
watershed are set out in Table 104.

These amounts can be multiplied by the cost of land treatment practices  to
derive  estimated  costs  for  the project if all recommended practices had
been applied and if no practice were applied that were not  needed.   These
results are presented in Table 105.

     Amounts of tnese practices can be projected to the total basin  on  to
the  basis  of  the  similarities between the Black Creek Watershed and the
basin.  This projection is made in the following discussion, not as a  plan
for  the  Maumee,  but as an example of how Black Creek cost figures can be
 DISCUSSION

-------
                                                                    243
                                 TABLE  104
          Estimated BMPs Needed  at Beginning of Black Creek  Project
    Practice

 Field  Borders
 Holding Tanks
 Sediment Basins
 Critical Area Planting
 Grassed Waterways
 Livestock Exclusion
   (fencing)
 Pasture Renovation
   and  Planting
 Terraces
  Amount Needed

    40 miles
    10
     6
    10 acres
    68 acres

15,000 feet

   400 acres
44,000 feet
                                 TABLE 105
            Projected Costs of Ideal Black Creek Land Treatment
    Practice                 Cost

Field Border                63,360
Holding Tanks               56,000
Sediment Basins             30,000
Critical Area Planting       4,000
Grassed Waterways           81,600
Livestock Exclusion
   (fencing)                  7,500
Pasture Renovation           4,000
Terraces                    77,000
  Total                    323,460
applied.  The following rationale was used.

     Field Borders:  In Black Creek, a field border is defined as a 16-foot
strip  of vegetation (usually sod) placed along a water course in cropland.
It is estimated, based on figures supplied by the Soil Conservation Service
in  Ohio,  that  13,800 miles of such stream bank exists in the basin.  The
total amount of field border needed would thus be 13,800 miles times two or
27,000  miles.  This amount multiplied by a unit cost of 1584 yields an es-
timated basin cost of $42.7 million.

     Holding Tanks:  In Black Creek, about 1/5  to  1/4  of  the  livestock
operations  needed holding tanks to improve water quality.  If the same ra-
tio holds in the Maumee Basin, the amount needed would be 800 to 1000.

     Sediment Basin:  There were six sites  in  Black  Creek  for  sediment
basins.  Multiplication this by the ratio of Black Creek area to basin area
would result in 2100 sites.  Since the erosive area  of  the  watershed  is
                                                           DISCUSSION

-------
244


 only 2/3  that  of  the basin,  the number of  sites could be as  low as  1400.

      Critical  Area Planting:  It was estimated  that   10  acres  of   critical
 area  planting were needed  in the Black Creek  area.  Projecting this  amount
 to  the total basin by  the previously described method results  in  an   esti-
 mate of 2500 to 3500 acres  for the basin.

      Grassed Waters:   Applying the same types  of estimates to  grassed wa-
 terways results in the following estimates:  16,000 - 24,000.

      Livestock Exclusion:   Applying these  factors plus  a  correction   based
 on   the fact that livestock is more common in  Black  Creek than in the Basin
 by  about  a 3/2 ratio,  results in an estimate of 500  miles of fencing   need-
 ed.    This is higher by a factor of 10 than  the amount estimated  in other
 studies,  which may indicate that extensive fencing has  already been done.

      Pasture Planting:  In  Black Creek, it was determined that about  4/5 of
 the  existing   pasture  needed replacement or  renovation.  Applying this to
 the 125,000 acres of pasture results in an estimated 100,000 acres.

      Terraces: Applying the standard corrections to the  44,000   feet of
 terrace  needed  in Black   Creek  results in  12,000,000 to  15,000,000 feet
 needed in the  Basin.

      These estimates,  multiplied by the Black  Creek  costs give a cost esti-
 mate for  the basin. This is shown in Table 106.
                                  TABLE 106
                       Estimated Costs - Maumee Basin

     Practice                     Cost

 Field Borders                 43,700,000
 Holding Tanks            4,480,000-5,600,000
 Sediment Basins          7,000,000-10,500,000
 Critical Area Planting   1,000,000-1,400,000
 Grassed Waterway        19,200,000-28,000,000
 Livestock Exclusion            1,300,000
 Pasture Planting              10,000,000
 Terraces                21,000,000-26,250,000
    Total                107,480,000-126,250,000
      In the preceding analysis,  no costs are assigned for   systems  related
 to  conservation tillage,  although crop residue management and conservation
 tillage are both considered to be important water  quality  management  prac-
 tices  in  the  Black Creek Watershed and the Maumee Basin.  In fact,  it is
 estimated that most of the approximately 4,600 acres of land in  the  Black
 Creek  Watershed which has an erosion problem and  which is utilized for row
 crop production and most of the  1.4 million acres  in the Maumee Basin  which
 is in crop production and which  is subject to erosion, would benefit from a
 water quality standpoint from conservation tillage practices.  However,  it
 is  further  believed that careful selection of the areas  where this is un-

DISCUSSION

-------
                                                                       245
dertaken and a willingness to phase-in new tillage systems  can   result   in
achieving  this practice at virtually no cost.

     Capital costs associated with changes of  tillage — such  as   an  esti-
mate  of   the cost of chisel plows or no-till  planters  that would be  needed
— have been included in some estimates of cost of conservation application
in the Maumee Basin.  However, if the purchase of this  equipment  is allowed
to be phased-in so that it can be obtained as  a part  of  normal   equipment
replacement  system  of  individual  farms,  the costs  are greatly reduced.
Landowners regularly replace equipment to maintain  complex  modern   farms.
The  cost  of electing to purchase a new chisel plow rather than a new mold-
board plow is not a significant one.

     Other costs associated  with  changes   in tillage relate   to   normal
operating  costs  and any yield reduction that might be associated with the
new tillage.

     In the Maumee Basin and Black Creek it  can be  expected   that certain
operational  costs — those associated with  depreciation of equipment, fuel
for tillage operations and labor in tillage  operations  will be reduced  by
reducing   the  amount  of  tillage done.  On the other  hand, certain  costs,
largely those associated with chemical weed  or pest control, will be  higher
in  reduced  tillage systems.  As a rule of  thumb, for  both corn  and  soybe-
ans, it can be assumed that the savings on one hand and the increased chem-
ical costs on the other will likely balance, leaving the impact on yield as
the cost most associated with conservation tillage.

     In the total basin, a relatively  small  amount  of  the  land,  about
170,000  acres,  can  be considered suitable for greatly reduced  tillage or
no-till systems.  This represents cropland that can be  expected to have  an
erosion  problem, but which does not have a  wetness hazard.  About 1.2 mil-
lion acres of the basin has both an erosion  hazard and  a  wetness hazard.
Tillage systems which leave large quantities of surface residue will  reduce
drying of  these soils in the spring and will  slow  warming  of   the  soil.
During years with wet and cool springs, significant yield reductions  can be
anticipated on this type of land.

     In the Black Creek project, conservation  tillage was defined as  a til-
lage  system which included one primary tillage operation (spring or  fall),
one secondary tillage operation (spring, no  more than   one  field cultiva-
tion,  and no  moldboard plowing.  This system reduced erosion and was, in
some cases, superior to conventional tillage.

     It is believed that this type of tillage  system could be  extended into
most of the erosive areas of the Maumee Basin  without danger of significant
yield reduction, particularly in corn and soybean rotations.   In  any  long-
term  attempt  to  introduce  conservation   tillage, however,  the option to
periodically moldboard plow to aid in weed or  disease  control   should  be
given landowners.

5.1.2 Arriving at BMP's

     The best management practices recommended for water  quality improve-
ment  in   the  preceding  discussion were selected in relationship to water
quality.  Water quality is not, however, the only goal  that  needs   to  be
considered  in  the  planning  of  the best  land use within an agricultural

                                                               DISCUSSION

-------
246

watershed.

     Conservation practices in the Black Creek project have been arbitrari-
ly categorized in four separate classification:

    1.  Those which benefit water quality
    2.  Those which protect the soil resource
    3.  Those which enhance production capability
    4.  Those which accomplish other conservation purposes

     The wise use of the land resource requires that all  of  these  objec-
tives  be  considered  when  planning  is undertaken.  In fact, a watershed
which has been properly  managed  will  have  elements  of  each  of  these
categories  and an ideally managed watershed can be considered one in which
all of the four classifications is maximized.  Unfortunately, in  the  real
watershed  which must be considered, these classifications can be conflict-
ing.  It may not, for example, be possible to have maximum crop  production
and maximum water quality at the same time.  It may also not be possible to
have maximum water quality, as defined by concentrations of nutrients,  and
maximum wildlife production in the same watershed at the same time.

     For example, as has been previously discussed, sediment may be reduced
by placing large quantities of stone on eroding channel banks and degrading
channel bottoms.  This, on the other hand, may interfere with fish communi-
ties through the reduction of habitat diversity.

     Conversely, some practices may serve more than one of the  four  clas-
sifications,   h practice may, for example, serve to both preserve the soil
resource and improve water quality.  A practice such as converting  erosive
crop  land  into a wildlife habitat might serve the purpose of soil protec-
tion, improvement of water quality, and the additional conservation purpose
of wildlife protection.

     While this is very useful from an environmental viewpoint, it is  much
less simple from an administrative viewpoint.  Precisely, if a practice can
be said to have both a water quality benefit and a soil protection benefit,
and  some  agency  is funding water quality improvement programs only, does
that practice meet the requirement of water quality improvement.   Similar-
ly,  if  a  project  improves  water  quality, but has an adverse effect on
wildlife, and these two aspects are being regulated by different  agencies,
how  is  a  conflict  to be resolved?  In order to obtain some insight into
these kinds of administrative questions, all of the practices in the  Black
Creek  project  were evaluated on the basis of each of the four classifica-
tions.  These results are included in Table 107.

     This analysis was then utilized to  assign  Black  Creek  actual  land
treatment  costs  to each of the four categories.  The results are included
in Figure 33.
DISCUSSION

-------
                                                                    247
     As can be  seen from Table 107 and Figure 33,  a large  share  of  funds
spent in the Black Creek demonstration project went for practices that were
not directly related to water quality.  On the other hand, according to the
                               TABLE 107
         Evaluation of Practices Applied in Black Creek Watershed
Practi ce
Conservation Cropping Cystcn
Contour Farming
Critical Area Planting
Crop Residue Management
Di vers i ons
Farmstead Windbreaks
Field Border
Field Windbreaks
Grade Stabilization Structures (1)
(a) aluminum toewall overfall str.
(b) surface water inlet pipes
(c) tile outlet protection pipes
Grassed Waterway
Holding Pond and Tanks (Animal '/aste)
Land Smoothing
Livestock Exclusion
Livestock Watering Facility
Mi n imum Till age
Pasture Management
Pasture Planting
Pond
Protection During Development
Recreation Area Improvement
Sediment Control Has ins
Stream Channel Stabilization (2)
Strear.ibank Protection (3)
Str i pcroppi r\r.
Surface Drains
PTO Terraces
Ti le Drains ( k )
(a) it inch
(b) b inch
(c) G inch
(d) 8 inch
(e) 10 inch
(f) 12 inch
(g) Ik inch
(h) 15 inch
Tree Planting
Wildlife Habitat Management
Woodland Improved Harvesting
Woodland Improvement
Woodland Pruning
Water
Qual i ty
2
1
1
1
2
1>
1
2
o
L.



1
1
k
1
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
2
3
2
3
1
3








2
3
3
3
3
So] 1
Protect ion
1
1
1
1
1
i
•)
1
1



1
3
3
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
2
3
1
2
1
3
1
2








2
3
3
2
2
Crop
Product i on
j
3
3
2
3
i*
it
3
3



3
2
1
1*
It
3
2
2
it
It
it
it
3
1
2
1
2
1








k
k
2
2
2
Other
Conservation
Uses
2
3
2
2
1*
1
o
2
it



3
it
it
2
3
2
3
2
1
2
1
2
3
2
2
it
2
3








1
1
1
1
1
                            (footnotes Next  Pagel
                                                                 DISCUSSION

-------
248
Pi rect Benefi t

1 -- Primary Benefit 2 -- Secondary Benefit 3 -- Very little,   if
any Benefit  k -- Ho Benefit


(1)  Includes both over-fall structures and surface inlet  pipes.
     If  we only considered over-fall structures we might justify
     primary benefit (1) to water quality, however, surface pipes
     are definately not primary for water quality.

(2)  Stream channel stabilization includes  all  use  of  rip-rap
     stone  for stabilizing channel  banks and bottoms.  Rock drop
     structures are included here.  The practice should be limit-
     ed to critical eroding areas only.

(3)  Streambank protection  involved using mechanical hoes to pull
     channel banks back to  stable slope and vegetating with grass
     mixtures.  In some case material v/as removed from the  chan-
     nel bottom to improve  drainage capacity of the channel.

(U)  Tile drains are primarily for removing subsurface  water   to
     improve  crop  production  by  reducing the wetness problems
     however, tile drains are a  necessary  part  of  some  water
     quality BMP's such as  grass waterways and terraces.

 *  Total cost for W/Q BMP's Applied = 211,383.49.
**  Total District  Payment  for  water  quality  BMP  applied  =
152,229.88.

Total  BMP cost per acre in watershed (12,000 Ac) over five  years
= 17.bl or 3.52/yr.

District Payment for BMP per acre in watershed  over  5  years  =
12.68

-------
                              1. Field Border
CO
                                                                                   WATER
                                                                                   QUALITY
                                                                                     ONLY
                                                                                    WATER
                                                                                   QUALITY
                                                                                     AND
                                                                                     SOIL
                                                                                 RESOURCE
                                                                                PROTECTION
                                                                                     SOIL
                                                                                PROTECTION
                                                                                    ONLY
                                                                                PRODUCTION
                                                                                    CROP
                                                                                   OTHER
                                                                              CONSERVATION
                                                                                    USES
                                                                                                    Black CreekCost Shai
                                                                                                      (Total per Practice)
                                                                                                          26,650.36
                                                                                                           4,448.90
                                                                                                          38,666.21
                                                                                                          70,020.21  (with
                                                                                                          71,200.45 (with
                                                                                                           1,334.81
                                                                                                          78.822.00
                                                                                                          55,077.40
  District Cost for
    $53.659.35
 Water Quality Only
  District Cost for
     Practices
   with Primary
   $66,003.53
  Benefit to Both
  Water Quality
and Soil Protection
  District Cost for
   $186,652.94
Soil Protection Only
                                                                                                                                        District Cost for
                                                                                                                                        Crop Production
                                                                                                                                          $96,537.18
 District Cost for
   $13.327.81
     Other
Conservation Uses
                                                                                                                                                            Cost
                                                                                                                                                         by Catagory
                                                                                                                                                                      Funding Sources
EPA 208 Funds
Culver Amendment
Clean Water Grants
EPA 208 Funds
Culver Amendment
Clean Water Grants
                            ACP Funds
                            Great Plains Funds
                            566 Watershed Funds
                            State Cost-Share
                            Fund for Erosion
                            Control Programs
ACP Funds
Great Plains Funds
566 Watershed l-unds
State Funds
                            USDA Loans
                            Production Credit
                                   Loans
                            Small Business Loans
                            Department of
                                   Interior Funds
                            Natural Resource
                                   Funding
                            Fishery Incentives
                            Wildlife Incentive
                                   Programs
                                                                                                                                                                                          Technical and
    SWCD's SCS
   Extension, EPA
Water Quality Agencies
                           EPA
                         SWCD's
                           SCS
                        Extension
                          ASCS
                     State Conservation
                         Agencies
                       Water Quality
                      Agencies Others
      SWCD's
     SCS ASCS
  Extension State
    Conservation
     Agencies
                        SWCD-SCS
                     Extension. ASCS
                   Private Lending Firms
                   Department of Interior
                       State Natural
                        Resources
                       SWCD's SCS
                     Extension, Others
                                                                                                                                                                                                            mplrance Mechanism
                                                                  Cost-Sharing Incentives
                                                                   Education. Tech. Ass.
                                                                     208 Regulations
                                                                                                                                                                                                         Cost-Sharing Incentives
                                                                                                                                                                                                          Education Technical
                                                                                                                                                                                                              Assistance
                                                                                                                                                                                                           State and County
                                                                                                                                                                                                          Erosion Control Laws
                                                                  Cost-Sharing Incentives
                                                                       Education
                                                                   Technical Assistance
                                                                     Erosion Control
                                                                       Regulation
                    Production Stimulus
                        Education
                      Financing Profit
                   Cost-Sharing Incentive:
                        Education
                    Technical Assistance,
                       Ordinances
                                                             Watershed
                                                               System
                                                             Adequately
                                                               Treated
                                                                                            Figure  33.   Assignment  of  Costs   to  Categories
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          NJ

-------
250
previous  analysis, only slightly more than $320,000 is now thought to have
been necessary to have  achieved  water  quality  objectives  through  land
treatment.   The  primary  reason  for  the substantial differences between
these two cost figures is the research and demonstration nature of the pro-
ject.

     One weakness of all of the above analyses from the standpoint of water
quality  is  the  inability  at this time to precisely relate costs of land
treatment to levels of water quality.  It is not possible, for example,  to
state that the $212,000 spent on water quality practices in the Black Creek
Watershed improved the quality of water in Black Creek by some  percentage.
It  is also not possible to project what spending $323,000 on water quality
practices, would have accomplished; and it is not possible to make an esti-
mate  of  how  much the Maumee River or Lake Erie would benefit by carrying
out all of the recommended practices.

     The ANSWERS model, which is discussed in detail elsewhere in this  re-
port, provides a mechanism by which these benefit and costs can be predict-
ed for small watersheds, and through  the  judicious  selection  of  sample
watersheds  (as  the  Black Creek area was selected to represent the Maumee
Basin) to much larger areas.  The ANSWERS model will, in its final form, be
capable of predicting improvements in water quality accomplished by specif-
ic land treatment practices.  By a technique similar  to  that  with  which
Black  Creek  costs  were  projected to the entire basin, water quality im-
provements can be projected from carefully modelled sample watersheds.

5.1.3 Engineering Observations

     Three engineering practices  were  investigated  in  the  Black  Creek
Watershed  which  were previously not common practices within the Soil Con-
servation Service in Indiana.  Two of these practices involved the  use  of
stone  for  channel protection.  The third involved the application of ter-
races in areas where terraces had not been normally be applied in the past.

     Terraces applied in the Black Creek project were of the parallel  type
with tile outlets, PTO.  A typical arrangement is shown in Figure 34.

     These terraces, with tile outlets, differ from graded terraces in that
they  are  laid  out  parallel to each other across the water course graded
slope.  They use tile to carry away the water.  They serve the dual purpose
of  reducing  slope length (and thereby erosion) and temporary retention of
surface water which in turn allows some sediment and attached pollutants to
settle out of the water before it enters the subsurface drain.

     PTO terraces as used in Black Creek are, in general, shorter than con-
ventional PTO terraces.  They are not necessarily constructed perpendicular
to the slope but are perpendicular to the minor water courses.  A series of
terraces  are  installed,  designed  according  to  SCS  standards so as to
prevent overtopping during a 10 year frequency storm event.

     The number and size of terraces needed is dependent on the size of the
drainage area being treated.  Outflow from the terrace is accomplished by a
riser pipe, upstream from the terrace.  An  orifice  plate  determines  the
rate  at which water will be discharged from the ponding behind the terrace
into the subsurface outlet.  The size of  the  orifice  determines  maximum
flow.   Outlet  tile  need  be designed only large enough to accomodate the
DISCUSSION

-------
                                                                        251

                 Figure 34. Typical PTO Terrace Arrangement
flow through this metered orifice.  Orifice size and tile size  are  deter-
mined on the basis of that necessary to allow discharge of all of the pond-
ed runoff from the design storm in a 24 hour period.

     Longer versions of the PTO terrace serve the same purpose as  do  con-
ventional  grass-back or broad-based parallel terraces,perpendicular to the
field slope.  In some cases, terraces were installed  in  the  Black  Creek
area  specifically  for  their  sediment control functions.  These terraces
generally involve smaller areas of steeper side slopes  and  function  pri-
marily as temporary sediment basins.

     Rock was used in the Black Creek project, both as an attempt to remove
velocity  from areas of rapid fall in stream channels and in unstable soil,
                                                                 DISCUSSION

-------
252


to prevent undermining of the channel at the seepage line.

     Details of one of these structures, intended  for  protection  of  un-
stable  channels are included in Figure 35.  In Black Creek, stone for pro-
tection was established to elevations above the seepage line  of  one,  two
and  three  feet  for experimental purposes.  Cost of this installation was
roughly $3 per lineal foot for the one foot series, $6  for  the  two  foot
series, and $9 for the three foot series.  Observations have indicated that
all three types of installations are equally satisfactory in reducing chan-
nel  instability.  It is therefore as successful to use the one foot eleva-
tion as it is the three foot elevation resulting in a  potential  practical
saving of $6 per linear foot in areas suited to the practice application.

     Structures called rock-drop structures were included in the project at
areas where rapid change in channel elevation produced erosion or bank sta-
bility problems through the high velocity of the water.

5.2 SOURCES OF SEDIMENT AND RELATED POLLUTANTS

5.2.1 Comparison of Subwatersheds

5.2.1.1 INTRODUCTION

     The Maumee River is usually a gently flowing river and even  in  flood
periods  the  velocities  are  relatively  low  because the gradient is not
steep.  However, the waters in the Maumee River never appear clear  because
of  its  suspended sediment load.  For a 10-year period of record, 1961-71,
the sediment rate from the Maumee River into Lake Erie averaged  about  500
kg/ha   (a  kilogram  per hectare is roughly equivalent to a pound per acre)
annually  (1,2).  However, sediment yields even of this rather low order  of
magnitude  may  be important in lowering the water quality in Lake Erie be-
cause they are composed mostly of colloidal-sized particles.  For  a  small
volume,  the  sediments  can carry a high nutrient load, particularly phos-
phorus.  Unknown at this time, however, is  the  contribution  which  phos-
phorus  attached  to sediments actually makes to the eutrophication rate of
Lake Erie.  It is implicitly assumed in this study that  some  of  the  at-
tached phosphorus becomes available to the eutrophication process occurring
in Lake Erie.

     This section reports on the sediment  and  nutrient  yields  from  the
Black  Creek  Watershed  into the Maumee River.  In particular, it compares
the data collected from  two major  drainage  areas  within  the  watershed.
However,  the  reported  results  are  based  only  on a  two-year period of
record, 1975 and 1976, which is a rather short hydrological period on which
to  make  definite  conclusions.  As a consequence, the conclusions reached
are subject to further modification with succeeding years of record.

5.2.1.2 STUDY AREA AND METHODS

     The Black Creek Watershed was chosen  as being  fairly representative of
the  soils  and  agricultural  practices of the Maumee Basin although it is
only 4950 ha  in  size compared to 1,711,500 ha for   the  Maumee  Basin.   An
outline map of the experimental watershed  together with instrumentation and
sampling  sites is shown  in  Figure 36.
 DISCUSSION

-------
                                                                 253
        Channel Bottom
«*• • *    #1 Crushed Stone
                                     «•    *     •       •-•«•
                                     •  o•° «'„• •••••• o • • • • •
                                            •  ..„ • •  .%.•«*.*.



                                            #1 Crushed Stone
           #1 Crushed Stone
Figure 35. Details of Channel Protecting Structure
                                               DISCUSSION

-------
254
                                                          Kaingage sites

                                                          Stage recorder sites
                                                       A  Sampling sites
                                               	 ^  FUELLING DRAIN
                                                                          MAUMEE
                                                                          RIVER
                         Figure 36. Instrumentation Sites
         The soils in the  Black Creek Watershed can be  roughly divided  into two
    categories  —  those   soils which were  formed entirely  in glacial  till and
    DISCUSSION

-------
                                                                        255


 those  soils which were  also  influenced  at various stages in their  formation
 by shallow water cover  or  by wave  action.   These soil  categories are subse-
 quently referred to  as  glacial  till  soils and  lake plain  and   beach  ridge
 soils,   respectively.    Indiana Highway  37   as shown in Figure 36  divides
 these  soils fairly well with the glacial till  soils to the  north  and  the
 lake   plain and beach ridge  soils  to the south.   The glacial till  soils  are
 gently rolling while the lake plain  soils are  nearly level.

     Two of the major drainage  areas which empty into  Black Creek, that   of
 the Dreisbach  Drain   and  Smith-Fry Drain, were studied intensively.   The
 Dreisbach  Drain is located along the western boundary  of the watershed  and
 the Smith-Fry Drain is located along the eastern boundary.  Their drainage
 areas,  of  comparable size, represent the greatest  contrast in soils  and
 land   use  within  the  watershed.  The  drainage  area of the Dreisbach Drain
 contains 74 percent  rolling  and 26 percent nearly  level  topography  while
 that of the Smith-Fry Drain  contains only 29 percent rolling and 71  percent
 nearly level  topography.   The land use  is also quite different  with  35 per-
 cent   of  the drainage  area  of  the Dreisbach Drain in  row crops as compared
 to 63  percent for the drainage  area  of  the Smith-Fry Drain.   The  drainage
 area   of  the Dreisbach Drain also contains the  town of Harlan  which has an
 effect on  water quality in  that   stream.   Characteristics of these  two
 drainage  areas as well as those for the Black Creek Watershed  are given in
 Table  108.  Note that characteristics of the total watershed are very simi-
 lar to those  for the drainage area for  the Smith-Fry Drain.
                                 TABLE  108
                    Characteristics of the Areas Studied

Characteristics
Drainage area:
Soil groups:
Lake plain & beach ridge
Glacial till
Land use:
Row crops
Small grain & pasture
Woods
Urban, roads, etc.
Homes :
Black Creek
Watershed
4950 ha

64%
36%

58%
31%
6%
5%

Smith-Fry
Drain
942 ha

71%
29%

63%
26%
8%
3%
28
Dreisbach
Drain
714 ha

26%
74%

35%
48%
5%
12%
143
     Sediment and nutrient yields from the Black Creek  Watershed  and   the
drainage  areas for the Dreisbach Drain and Smith-Fry Drain were determined
by integrating  sediment  and  nutrient  concentrations  with  flow  rates.
Stage-discharge relationships were developed for the outlets of these study
areas to give flow rates.  Water stages were recorded continuously at these
locations with a pressure-type stage recorder  (Model 12 Flow Recorder, Fox-
boro).  (Product descriptions and manufacturers are given for reader infor-
mation and should not be construed as endorsements.)

     Water samples for determining the concentrations of sediment  and   nu-


                                                                 DISCUSSION

-------
 256


trients  were  collected  either manually or with automated samplers.  Grab
samples were collected each week and also during  storm  events.   The  au-
tomated  samplers  were triggered at a set minimum stage and then continued
to operate automatically until the sample  storage  was  exhausted  or  the
stage  fell  below  the set minimum stage.  The water samples were normally
collected and the automated sampler reset before the sample storage was ex-
ceeded.

     Three automated pumping samplers (PS-69, U.S.  Interagency  Sedimenta-
tion  Project)  were installed at the junctions of the Dreisbach and Smith-
Fry Drains with Black Creek and on the main stem of Black  Creek  near  its
entrance  into the Maumee River.  Each sampler was capable of automatically
collecting 72 samples of 500 ml each at a chosen time interval.

     After the samples were collected, they were frozen  within  24  hours.
Before  analysis,  the  samples were thawed and one-half of the sample fil-
tered.  Suspended sediment was determined  by  passing  200  ml  of  runoff
through  a  tared membrane filter (0.40 pore diameter, Nucleopore) and then
weighing the collected solids after oven drying at 105  degrees  C  for  24
hours.

     The nutrients analyzed were nitrogen and phosphorus and their  consti-
tuent  forms.   Ammonium and nitrate in the filtrate were determined by the
method of Bremner and Kenney (3).  Total nitrogen in the filtered  and  un-
filtered  samples  were determined by the method of Nelson and Sommers (4).
Soluble inorganic phosphorus in the filtrate  was  analyzed  by  procedures
outlined  by  Murphy and Riley  (5).  And total phosphorus was determined by
the method described by Sommers and Nelson  (6).  A detailed description  of
the analyses procedures is given in the Section 0.0.2.1 of this volume.

5.2.1.3 RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

     The results and conclusions  associated  with  sediment  and  nutrient
yields  are  based  on two years of record — 1975 and 1976.  Precipitation
for 1975 was about 20 percent over normal, but for 1976  it  was  about  20
percent  less than normal.  Fortunately these two years represent as wide  a
variation in precipitation amounts and patterns as will likely occur over  a
lengthy period of record.

     For better comprehension of the data, the reader should remember  that
1975  was  a  wet year and 1976 was a relatively dry year.  Also the reader
should remember that the drainage area for the  Dreisbach  Drain  was  more
rolling  and  less intensively  farmed than the drainage area for the Smith-
Fry Drain.  Also as an aid to the reader, conclusions  are  reported  under
each  subheading  while  the information upon which they are based is still
apparent to the reader.

5.2.1.3.1 Values of Important Parameters

     The rainfall, runoff, sediment yields and  total  nitrogen  and  phos-
phorus  yields  for the Black Creek Watershed and the drainage areas of the
Dreisbach Drain and Smith-Fry Drain are given in Table 109.

     Note under the column for  Black Creek  Watershed  that  a  40  percent
reduction in  rainfall from 1975 to 1976 resulted  in 60 percent reduction  in
runoff, a greater than fourfold reduction in sediment yield, a greater than
DISCUSSION

-------
                                                                        257
                                 TABLE 109
     Rainfall and Runoff Amounts  and  Yields  of  Sediment and Nutrients

Parameter
Rainfall

Runoff

Sediment

Total N

Total P


Year
1975
1976
1975
1976
1975
1976
1975
1976
1975
1976
Black
Creek
Watershed
112
70
27.5
11.2
2370
530
48.7
8.6
5.2
1.1
cm
cm
cm
cm
kg/ha
kg/ha
kg/ha
kg/ha
kg/ha
kg/ha
Smith-Fry
Drain
112
70
29.1
12.4
2130
640
53.2
10.3
5.4
1.1
cm
cm
cm
cm
kg/ha
kg/ha
kg/ha
kg/ha
kg/ha
kg/ha
Dreisbach
Drain
112
70
26.0
10.1
3740
380
44.1
6.6
5.0
1.0
cm
cm
cm
cm
kg/ha
kg/ha
kg/ha
kg/ha
kg/ha
kg/ha
fivefold reduction in total  nitrogen  discharged,  and  about  a  fivefold
reduction  in  total  phosphorus discharged from the watershed.  These data
clearly demonstrate the adverse effects of excess rainfall.

     Conclusion: Amounts of runoff, sediment, and nutrients discharged from
a small watershed are greatly affected by rainfall.  Reductions in rainfall
give a greater percentage reduction in runoff which in turn gives  a  still
greater percentage reduction in sediment and nutrient transport.

     The runoff and sediment yield data  for  the  drainage  areas  of  the
Smith-Fry Drain and the Dreisbach Drain present an interesting comparison.

     The runoff from the drainage area for the Smith-Fry Drain was  greater
than  that  for  the  Dreisbach  Drain in both 1975 and 1976.  Although the
drainage area for the Smith-Fry Drain was more level than the drainage area
for  the  Dreisbach  Drain, it also had better subsurface drainage and base
flow also seemed to be sustained for longer periods of times from interflow
through the ditch banks.

     In 1975, the year with above normal rainfall, the  sediment  yield  at
the outlet of the Dreisbach Drain was about twice that at the outlet of the
Smith-Fry Drain.  However, in 1976, the reverse  was  true.   Although  all
values  were  much lower, the sediment yield at the outlet of the Smith-Fry
Drain was about twice that at the  outlet  of  the  Dreisbach  Drain.   The
better  land use in the drainage area of the Dreisbach Drain was apparently
sufficient to retard  runoff  and  subsequent  erosion  more  than  in  the
drainage  area  of  the  Smith-Fry  Drain with its more intensive land use.
However, when rainfall was excessive, as in 1975, greater runoff and subse-
quent  erosion occurred on the drainage area of the Dreisbach Drain than on
the drainage area of the Smith-Fry Drain because of steeper slopes  on  the
drainage area of the Dreisbach Drain.

     Conclusion: During years with above average rainfall,  land  slope  is
clearly the dominant factor affecting sediment yields.  However, with below
average rainfall, "the effect of land use on sediment yields  becomes  rela-
tively  more  important.   This  reflects the natural sequence of rainfall-
                                                                 DISCUSSION

-------
258


runoff  events because  rainfall must first meet  the storage capabilities   of
the soil and land surface before runoff begins.

5.2.1.3.2 Nutrient Transport

     The total nutrient yields for 1975  and  1976  from  the  Black  Creek
Watershed and the drainage areas of the Smith-Fry and Dreisbach Drains were
given in Table 109.  Their constitutive forms in kg/ha are shown   in  Table
110.
                                 TABLE 110
                         Nutrient Transport (kg/ha)
Smith-Fry
Component
Soluble inorganic P
Soluble organic P
Sediment P
Ammonium N
Nitrate N
Soluble organic N
Sediment N
1975
0.14
0.10
5.2
1.5
19
1.7
31
1976
0.06
0.03
0.98
0.60
5.5
0.31
3.9
Dreisbach
1975
0.34
0.12
4.5
1.8
12
2.3
28
1976
0.18
0.04
0.73
0.85
2.4
0.53
2.8
     All of the forms of nitrogen and phosphorus  transported  greatly  de-
creased  from  1975 to 1976 due primarily to decreased runoff.  The amounts
transported from one drainage area are roughly similar to the other  except
for soluble inorganic phosphorus and perhaps nitrate nitrogen.

     The larger amounts of soluble inorganic phosphorus from  the  drainage
area  of  the  Dreisbach  Drain  were caused by the larger number of houses
discharging domestic sewage into the Dreisbach Drain  as  compared  to  the
Smith-Fry  Drain.  On the other hand, larger amounts of nitrate-N on a area
basis were being discharged from the Smith-Fry Drain in comparison  to  the
Dreisbach  Drain  very likely because of more extensive subsurface drainage
and row crop farming in the drainage area of the Smith-Fry Drain.

     Percentages of nitrogen and phosphorus forms  which  were  transported
past the outlets of the two drains are given in Tables 111 and 112.

     Of interest in Table 111 is the shifting which takes place between the
various  nitrogen  forms  from 1975 to 1976.  Sediment nitrogen was high in
1975 because excess rainfall caused more runoff during that year.  In 1976,
the relative dry year, ammonium and nitrate-N constituted a greater percen-
tage of the total nitrogen transported than in 1975.

     With regard to phosphorus transport, most of that which was transport-
ed was sediment-bound, as shown in Table 112.

     Conclusion: With average or above average rainfall amounts, more  than
90 percent of the total phosphorus transported is sediment-bound.  However,
only about 50 percent of the total nitrogen is sediment-bound.   Models  of
DISCUSSION

-------
                                                                        259
                                  TABLE 111
                    Percent of Nitrogen Forms  Transported
Form of N transported
Drain
Smith-Fry

Dreisbach

Year
1975
1976
1975
1976
Amm.-N
2.8
5.8
4.1
12.9
Nit.-N
35.7
53.4
27.2
36.5
Sol Org N
3.2
3.0
5.2
8.1
Sed N
58.3
37.8
63.5
42.5
                                 TABLE  112
                  Percent of Phosphorus Forms Transported
Form of P transported
Drain
Smith-Fry

Dreisbach

Year
1975
1976
1975
1976
Sol Inorg P
2.6
5.9
6.9
19.0
Sol Org P
1.8
3.2
2.4
4.2
Sed P
95.6
90.9
90.7
76.8
P-transport can be based on models of  the  erosion-sedimentation  process.
We  recommend  that  models of N-transport should not be based on models of
the erosion-sedimentation process only.

5.2.1.3.3 Partitioning of Certain Parameters

     The runoff and transported sediment and nutrients were separated  into
different categories dependent essentially on the size of the runoff event.
These categories were:  base flow, small events,  large  events,  and  snow
melt.

     Snow melt was a lumped flow event of base flow and small events  which
occurred  during  thaw  periods.  In many instances, the outlet drains were
then blocked by ice and snow and  the  recorded  water  stages  were  high.
Under  these  conditions,  the snow melt flow reported is our best estimate
based on the depth of snow over the drainage area and the amount  of  rain-
fall  which may have occurred simultaneously with the thaw.  Unfortunately,
the actual water stage and its uncorrected runoff  were  reported  in  some
earlier project reports.  The data below supersedes that reported earlier.

     Base flow can easily be identified from the runoff hydrograph  because
it  is  a  longtime,  steady (depth does not vary with time) flow event.  A
large event was arbitrarily established as an  event  which  produced  more
than  2.5 cm (1 inch)  of runoff from an entire drainage area.  Small events
were those flow events which occurred between  base  flow  and  large  flow
                                                                 DISCUSSION

-------
260
 events.

      The results of partitioning the runoff and transported  sediments  and
 nutrients  for  the  Smith-Fry and Dreisbach Drains are given in Tables 113
 and 114.
                                  TABLE 113
 Partitioning of Runoff, Transported Sediment and Nutrients - Smith-Fry Drain

Component


Runoff
Sediment
Sol Inorg P
Sol Org P
Sed P
Amm.-N
Nit.-N
Sol Org N
Sed N
Base
1975


17
3
7
14
1
15
13
18
1
Flow
1976


23
5
13
12
5
20
13
18
8
Small
1975


35
19
43
38
26
34
40
18
18
Event
1976


14
6
15
14
6
29
21
20
9
s Large E
1975
ii_ j
L.L cuiSpOL uGQ
34
73
37
34
69
40
27
37
77
vents
1976


54
86
41
62
80
36
60
41
80
Snow
1975


14
5
13
14
4
11
20
27
4
Melt
1976


9
3
31
12
9
15
6
21
3
                                  TABLE 114
 Partitioning of Runoff, Transported Sediment and Nutrients - Dreisbach Drain

Component


Runoff
Sediment
Sol Inorg P
Sol Org P
Sed P
Amm.-N
Nit.-N
Sol Org N
Sed N
Base
1975


10
1
o
8
2
13
8
9
1
Flow
1976


22
6
22
23
7
20
10
31
4
Small
1975


37
14
49
42
32
35
37
27
23
Event
1976


11
4
5
12
4
29
7
18
3
s Large E
1975
• — — .— , «—,». I- — J
ur cinspOL ueo
38
78
26
33
58
28
34
48
68
vents
1976


56
84
41
52
78
31
75
36
83
Snow
1975


15
7
19
17
8
24
21
16
8
Melt
1976


11
6
32
13
11
20
8
15
10
      The large flow events only occurred a few times during either 1975  or
 1976.  In 1975 only three storms produced over 2.5 cm of runoff from an en-
 tire drainage area and in 1976 only two such storms  occurred.   Yet  these
 storms  accounted for the major sediment and sediment-bound nutrients tran-
 sported from the two drainages areas.  Less than 6 percent of the  sediment
 was transported by base flow and over 70 percent by large flow events.

      Conclusion: Transport of sediments  and  sediment-bound  nutrients  is
 strongly associated with large storms which occur only a few times during a
 DISCUSSION

-------
                                                                          261
year.

     With small watersheds, the runoff period  is  relatively  short.   The
time  from  the  beginning of a storm to the time peak runoff occurs at the
outlets of the two drains is between two and three hours.  With only a grab
sample program it would be very likely that all or parts of the major storm
events would have been missed.  As a consequence, the sediment and nutrient
yields  from  a  small  watershed may be grossly underestimated if based on
grab sample data.  In our case if the  large  events  had  been  completely
missed  by  a  sampling program only about one-third of the actual sediment
yield would have been reported.  High concentrations in  grab  samples,  if
sustained,  will  still  indicate a serious pollution problem.  However, an
analysis such as we are presenting here would be impossible because of data
gaps.

     Conclusion: In order to characterize nutrient  and  sediment  loadings
from  small  watersheds,  runoff  from  large  storm  events  must be well-
monitored and, with few exceptions, automated sampling is required.

     During certain snow melt periods, it was noticed that high loadings of
soluble  inorganic  phosphorus  frequently  occurred.   This  may have been
caused by a release from decayed vegetative matter at this time.   Whatever
the  exact  causes,  however, the levels of soluble inorganic phosphorus as
well as the other soluble forms of phosphorus and nitrogen were higher dur-
ing  snow  melt  events  than  the percentage of runoff during these events
would indicate.

     Conclusion: During snow melt, the transport of soluble  nutrients  may
be disproportionally high when compared with snow melt runoff.

5.2.1.3.4 Sediment and Nutrients in Runoff

     The average concentrations of sediment and nutrients given as a  total
and  also  partitioned  according  to runoff events are given in Tables 115
through 118.  Tables 115 and 116 are for the Smith-Fry Drain for  1975  and
1976,  respectively, Table 117 and 118 are for the Dreisbach Drain also for
these two years.
                                 TABLE 115
       Smith-Fry Drain - Sediment and Nutrient Concentrations  (1975)

Component


Sediment
Sol Inorg P
Sol Org P
Sed P
Amm.-N
Nit.-N
Sol Org N
Sed N

Total


730
0.05
0.03
1.8
0.52
b.5
0.58
11
Base
Flow


130
0.02
0.03
0.11
0.46
2.1
0.61
0.40
Small
Events
««_ /I
mg/i
400
0.06
0.04
1.3
0.51
7.4
0.39
5.6
Large
Events


1570
0.05
0.03
3.7
0.61
5.2
0.63
25
Snow
Melt


260
0.04
0.03
0.51
0.41
9.3
1.1
3.1
                                                       DISCUSSION

-------
262
                                   TABLE 116
         Smith-Fry Drain - Sediment and Nutrient Concentrations (1976)

Component


Sediment
Sol Inorg P
Sol Org P
Sed P
Amm.-N
Nit.-N
Sol Org N
Sed N

Total


520
0.05
0.03
0.79
0.48
4.5
0.25
3.2
Base
Flow


110
0.03
0.01
0.17
0.42
2.5
0.20
1.1
Small
Events

-mg/j.
230
0.06
0.03
0.35
1.0
6.8
0.36
2.1
Large
Events


830
0.04
0.03
1.2
0.32
5.0
0.19
4.7
Snow
Melt


170
0.19
0.04
0.79
0.80
3.0
0.58
1.1
                                   TABLE 117
         Dreisbach Drain - Sediment and Nutrient Concentrations (1975)

Component


Sediment
Sol Inorg P
Sol Org P
Sed P
Amm.-N
Nit.-N
Sol Org N
Sed N

Total


1430
0.13
0.05
1.9
0.70
4.5
0.88
11
Base
Flow


140
0.08
0.04
0.38
0.91
3.6
0.79
1.1
Small
Events
rnn/l
mg/j.
540
0.17
0.05
1.6
0.74
4.5
0.64
6.8
Large
Events


2900
0.09
0.04
2.9
0.52
4.0
1.1
20
Snow
Melt


670
0.16
0.05
1.0
1.1
6.3
0.94
5.9
                                   TABLE 118
         Dreisbach Drain - Sediment and Nutrient Concentrations (1976)

Component


Sediment
Sol Inorg P
Sol Org P
Sed P
Amm.-N
Nit.-N
Sol Org N
Sed N

Total


380
0.18
0.04
0.72
0.84
2.4
0.52
2.8
Base
Flow


120
0.18
0.04
0.23
0.75
1.1
0.73
0.51
Small
Events
/-i
mg/i
140
0.08
0.04
0.26
2.2
1.5
0.85
0.76
Large
Events


580
0.13
0.04
1.0
0.47
3.2
0.33
4.2
Snow
Melt


210
0.52
0.05
0.72
1.5
1.8
0.71
2.6
  DISCUSSION

-------
                                                                        263
      These tables reinforce the previous conclusions with regard to the ef-
 fect of large storm events on sediment and nutrient transport.   In addition
 to amounts, concentrations also increase for large events.

      Conclusion:  Sediment and sediment-associated  nutrient  concentrations
 increase markedly with large storm events.

      In 1975, these concentrations (sediment,  sed P, sed N)   were  approxi-
 mately  double  that  of  the  average  yearly  concentrations  in the total
 discharge.  Even in 1976, which was a relatively dry year, these concentra-
 tions  were approximately 50 percent higher than the average yearly concen-
 trations.  However, the concentrations of the  soluble forms of  nitrogen and
 phosphorus  for  the large events were in general about equal to the average
 yearly concentrations in the total discharge.   This was probably due to di-
 lution  by  large runoff volumes.   On the other hand, the concentrations of
 soluble forms in snow melt were in general higher than the  average  yearly
 concentrations in the total discharge.

      It would be difficult just by looking at  these average  concentrations
 to  judge  whether the streams in the Black Creek Watershed are meeting the
 "fishable and swimmable" criteria set forth in PL 92-500,  the  clean  water
 bill.   During critical low flow periods which  normally occur in late summer
 and fall, the flow remaining in the streams often  collects  into  shallow,
 stagnating  pools.   If sunlight is available,  considerable blue-green algal
 growth may occur.   What through-flow occurs is sometimes augmented by  sep-
 tic tank discharge which should actually be classified and treated as point
 source pollution.   Septic tank  discharge  may  keep  the  streams  in  the
 watershed from drying up completely,  but on the other hand,  it  provides the
 nitrogen and phosphorus necessary for algal growth.

      It is difficult to compare our  records  with  those  for   the  Maumee
 River.   In 1976,  the sediment loss from the Black Creek Watershed was about
 the same as the  longterm average from the Maumee River as measured  at  Wa-
 terville,  Ohio.    In 1975,  however,  the sediment loss from the Black Creek
 Watershed was over  four  times the  longterm average recorded  at  the  station
 in  Waterville.    The total  phosphorus  concentration in the  Maumee River at
 New Haven which  is  just above the  entrance of  Black  Creek into   the  Maumee
 River   as measured  by the Water  Pollution Control Plant of Fort Wayne aver-
 aged about 0.45 mg/1 for  1975-76.   Their average measured  sediment 'concen-
 tration  for   these two  years was  around 80 mg/1.  Our measurement of total
 phosphorus concentrations at the State  Route 101 bridge across   the  Maumee
 River   and  just below the entrance of  Black Creek into the  river were 0.48
 mg/1 and 0.43 mg/1  for  1975  and  1976, respectively.   Our   average  measured
 sediment  concentrations  were  240  mg/1  and  140 mg/1 for these two years.
 All  of  the water samples, those  collected  by the  Water   Pollution  Control
 Plant of Ft. Wayne  and by us,  were  grab samples  and  the concentrations were
 not  flow weighted.  We collected more  samples   particularly during  storm
 events.    This  could account for much  of  the difference between the values
 for  sediment concentrations.

     The  total phosphorus concentrations agree closely.  Both sets  of  data
also  indicate that  total phosphorus  concentrations  in the Maumee River  are
not correlated closely to sediment  concentrations.  Our data for  the Maumee
River  show  that   21 percent of the  total phosphorus  concentration in 1975
and 42 percent of the total phosphorus concentration  in  1976  was   soluble
                                                                 DISCUSSION

-------
264


 phosphorus.   The  total phosphorus concentrations in the Maumee River seem
 to be greatly influenced by soluble phosphorus; on the other hand, the  to-
 tal  phosphorus concentrations in the Black Creek Watershed are greatly in-
 fluenced by sediment-bound phosphorus.

      The average suspended sediment concentration at Waterville, Ohio, near
 the  entrance of the Maumee River into Lake Erie is approximately 200 mg/1.
 This corresponds to the sediment concentrations reported  above  and  indi-
 cates that if comparisons with our data can be made they should be with our
 base flow and some part of our small flow events and certainly not with ei-
 ther  our  total flow or large flow event categories.  If we did this, then
 the concentrations of total phosphorus and suspended sediments seem  to  be
 in rough agreement.

      Conclusion:  Average  concentrations  of   sediments   and   nutrients
 discharged from the Maumee River are in line with measurable concentrations
 in the Maumee River.

      This conclusion seems to skirt the issue of  the  source  of  the  nu-
 trients  in  the Maumee River.  However, there is a scarcity of data, espe-
 cially of data which were gathered and analyzed the  same  way,  for  valid
 comparisons  to  be made.  Certainly, we do not wish to give the impression
 that reductions of nutrient loadings from agricultural watersheds into  the
 Maumee  River  are  not desirable.  On the other hand, the relatively large
 concentrations of soluble phosphorus in the  Maumee  River  would  indicate
 that industries and municipalities still have a job to do also.

 5.2.1.3.5 Runoff,Sediment,Nutrient Sources

      The probable sources of runoff and transported sediment and  nutrients
 in  the Smith-Fry and Dreisbach Drain for 1975 and 1976 are given in Tables
 119 through 122.  The waste treatment facility  for  almost  all  non-Amish
 homes in the watershed is a septic tank which is discharged directly with a
 tile drain or a stream.  The sewage column  reflects  the  contribution  of
 outfalls  for  septic  tanks.   Calculations  were  made  by  assuming  the
 discharge from each home to be 100 gallons per day.  The  column  for  rain
 shows  those  chemical components which were measured in rainfall as a per-
 centage of the total amount which was discharged for that particular  year.
 It does not represent the proportion of the soluble forms which was contri-
 buted by rainfall, but it merely indicates that rainfall is also  a  poten-
 tial  source  for  these phosphorus or nitrogen forms.  The contribution of
 soluble inorganic phosphorus by rainfall would be included  in  the  column
 for  land, and the contribution of ammonium or nitrate-nitrogen by rainfall
 might be included under the tiles, interflow or land columns.

      Conclusion: Losses  of  soluble  inorganic  phosphorus,  ammonium  and
 nitrate-nitrogen from the watershed are partially due to the input of these
 chemical forms by precipitations.

      The land surface was the major source of  the  sediment  and  nutrients
 which  were  transported in the Smith-Fry and Dreisbach Drains during 1975.
 Over 90 percent of the sediment  and  sediment-bound  nutrients  originated
 from  the  land  surface  during  that  year.   This also held true for the
 Smith-Fry Drain in 1976.  However, in  the  Dreisbach  Drain  during  1976,
 sewage  outflow  which  constituted   only 3 percent of the  runoff contained
 substantial percentages of the soluble  nutrients as well as some  sediment-
 DISCUSSION

-------
                                                                         265
                                 TABLE 119
Sources of Runoff, Transported Sediment and Nutrients - Smith-Fry Drain  (1975)
Component


Runoff
Sediment
Sol Inorg P
Sol Org P
Sed P
Amm.-N
Nit.-N
Sol Org N
Sed N
Tiles


15
1.3
4
8
0.6
9
25
9
0.2
Interflow


17
—
5
9
. —
10
28
10
—
Sewage
1 «»*k^V -1- J-l
tr anspor tea —
0.3
0.2
27
5
6
5
1.1
—
0.4
Land


64
97
64
78
93
76
46
81
99
Rain*




(115)


(340)
(35)


   Percentage of soluble nutrient as measured in the storm which could
   have been supplied by rainfall.
                                 TABLE 120
Sources of Runoff, Transported Sediment and Nutrients - Smith-Fry Drain  (1976)
Component


Runoff
Sediment
Sol Inorg P
Sol Org P
Sed P
Amm.-N
Nit.-N
Sol Org N
Sed N
Tiles


8
1.4
2
15
0.4
5
18
11
0.3
Interflow


18
—
5
16
—
12
43
13
—
Sewage
4- if it v^nnxs. 
-------
266
  from the Black Creek Watershed.

       Conclusion: Most of the sediment  and  sediment-bound  nutrients  ori-
  ginate  in runoff from the land surface.  The discharge of ammonium  is also
  largely associated  with  runoff  from  the  land  surface.   However,   the
  discharge from septic tank outlets contributes substantial amounts of solu-
  ble inorganic phosphorus into the streams in the watershed.

  5.2.1.3.6 Average Yearly Concentrations
                                   TABLE 121
  Sources of Runoff, Transported Sediment and Nutrients - Dreisbach Drain  (1975)
Component


Runoff
Sediment
Sol Inorg P
Sol Org P
Sed P
Amm.-N
Nit.-N
Sol Org N
Sed N
Tiles


23
1.1
7
15
0.9
7
25
13
0.8
Interflow


8
—
2.4
5
—
2.4
9
5
—
Sewage
J_ r\f^ *- A- r^s3
CL cinspo L ueu
1.2
0.4
37
14
5
13
6
—
1.1
Land


68
98
54
66
94
78
60
82
98
Rain*




(46)


(280)
(56)


   * Percentage of soluble nutrient as measured in the stream which
    could have been supplied by rainfall.
                                   TABLE 122
  Sources of Runoff, Transported Sediment and Nutrients - Dreisbach Drain  (1976)
Component


Runoff
Sediment
Sol Inorg P
Sol Org P
Sed P
Amm.-N
Nit.-N
Sol Org N
Sed N
Tiles


12
2
3
10
1
3
24
11
2
Interflow
g.
t>
13
—
3
11
—
4
26
12
—
Sewage
•4- *- ai"^G7"V\ Y" ^fis^ 	
UL cinbpoi. neu
3
7
71
44
35
28
30
—
16
Land


72
91
23
35
64
65
20
77
82
Rain*




(54)


(380)



    * Percentage of  soluble nutrient as measured  in  the stream which
     could have been supplied by rainfall.
   at
 The average yearly sediment and nutrient concentrations in the  runoff
the  outlets  of the Smith-Fry and Dreisbach Drains are given in Tables
  DISCUSSION

-------
                                                                         267


 123 and 124, respectively.
                                  TABLE 123
 Yearly Concentrations, Transported Sediment & Nutrients-Smith-Fry Drain (75-76)
Component


Sediment
Sol Inorg P
Sol Org P
Sed P
Amm.-N
Nit.-N
Sol Org N
Sed N
Stream


630
0.05
0.03
1.3
0.50
5.5
0.42
7.1
Tiles


60
0.01
0.02
0.04
0.31
11
0.35
0.12
Interflow
«%~*. /T
— -nig/i
—
0.01
0.02
—
0.31
11
0.35
—
Sewage


470
4.2
0.57
8.4
8.0
24
—
15
Land


1060
0.05
0.03
2.1
0.59
5.9
1.0
13
Rain



0.014


0.46
.59


                                  TABLE 124
 Yearly Concentrations,  Transported  Sediment  & Nutrients-Dreisbach Drain (75-76)
Component


Sediment
Sol Inorg P
Sol Org P
Sed P
Amm.-N
Nit.-N
Sol Org N
Sed N
Stream


910
0.16
0.05
1.3
0.77
3.5
0.70
6.9
Tiles


70
0.04
0.03
0.07
0.22
4.9
0.48
0.36
Interflow
	 __-nrt /I
"KJ/-L

0.01
0.02
—
0.22
4.9
0.48
—
Sewage


470
4.2
0.57
8.4
8.0
24
—
15
Land


1570
0.14
0.04
1.7
0.97
3.6
0.75
10
Rain



0.014


0.46
0.59


     The concentrations in the column for  stream  are  the  average  flow-
weighted  concentrations  from the sources: tiles, interflow, sewerage, and
runoff.  The concentrations of soluble nutrient forms  in  the  column  -for
rain are given as reference values only.

     The ye rly concentrations are averages of the concentrations for a re-
latively  wet and a relatively dry year and so might well be good estimates
of the longtime  yearly  concentrations  in  the  Smith-Fry  and  Dreisbach
Drains.   As  such  they  tend to reinforce the conclusion that the average
concentrations seem to be in line with the measurement of  similar  concen-
trations in the Maumee River.

5.2.1.3.7 Average  Nutrients on Sediments

     The average yearly concentrations of total nitrogen and phosphorus  in
suspended  sediments from the Black Creek Watershed are shown in Table 125.
Also shown are these concentrations with respect to relatively  undisturbed
soils in the watershed.
                                                                 DISCUSSION

-------
268
                                   TABLE 125
     Yearly Concentrations of Total N and P Attached to Sediment  (1975-76)
    Soil and Sediment          Total N             Total P
                               	g/1	

  Watershed Soils                1760                 680
  Sediment:
     Stream                      8900                1800
     Tile drains                 3600                 950
     Septic tanks               24000               19000
     Surface runoff              8800                1600
       The average yearly concentrations of the nutrients attached   to   sedi-
  ments in Black Creek, in the outflow from tile drainage underlying portions
  of  the watershed, in the effluent from  septic  tanks  into  the   watershed
  streams,  and  from  surface runoff can be compared to these concentrations
  which are attached to relatively undisturbed soils in the watershed.

       Conclusion: Sediments in runoff are nutrient enriched.  The  least  en-
  richment  occurs  from subsurface drainage systems and the most from  septic
  tank outfalls.  The sediments in Black Creek have an enrichment   factor   of
  about three as compared to the uneroded soils in the watershed.

  5.2.1.3.8 Estimate of Added Nutrients Lost

       The estimation of nutrients which were added as commercial fertilizers
  or  manures lost from the Black Creek Watershed is a tenuous undertaking  but
  certainly one which should be  addressed.   Estimates  of  the  application
  rates for fertilizers and manures were based on a questionnaire  (8).

       A nitrogen balance for the entire watershed subdivided  between   Amish
  and non-Amish farms is shown in Tables 126 and 127.  The amount of nitrogen
  applied as commercial fertilizer and manure and fixed by  legumes  was  re-
  garded  as the same for both 1975 and 1976.  We assumed that mineralization
  of  nitrogen was balanced by that which was fixed in the soil mass. The  in-
  put of  nitrogen  caused by that portion of the precipitation which  infil-
  trated into the soil was added to the subtotal for both years.    The   total
  applied  or  fixed  nitrogen  was then estimated as 329,500 kg for 1975  and
  316,500 in 1976.

       The applied or fixed nitrogen  lost  from the watershed was the measured
  amount  of  soluble  inorganic nitrogen discharged from the watershed minus
  the contribution from septic tank outfalls and that portion of the percipi-
  tation  which  occurred  as  runoff.  The loss of applied or  fixed nitrogen
  from the Black Creek Watershed was  then estimated as 66,000 kg for 1975  and
  10,700 kg for 1976.

       If we assume  that  the same proportion of  the applied or  fixed nitrogen
  was lost, then 20 percent of  the nitrogen applied as commercial  fertilizer
  and manure was lost in  1975, a very wet year,  and 3  percent  was  lost   in
  1976, a relatively dry  year.  The loss of soluble inorganic phosphorus ori-
   DISCUSSION

-------
                                                                         269
                                  TABLE 126
                  Estimate of Annual Applied Fixed Nitrogen
Nitrogen Source


Commercial fertilizer or manure:
Corn
Soybeans
Small grain
Hay and pasture
Fixation:
Soybeans
Forage legumes
Total
Amish



12,200
-
5,400
13,800

-
11,000
42,400
Non-Ami sh
IT,.,
Kg

153,200
5,700
23,400
3,000

57,900
1,200
244,400
Total



165,400
5,700
28,800
16,800

57,900
12,200
286,800
                                 TABLE  127
        Estimate of Percent Applied  and  Fixed Nitrogen Lost (1975-76)
   Nitrogen  Input or  Loss
Applied  and  fixed nitrogen  inputs
Input  due  to infiltrated precipitation
Total  nitrogen  input
Total  nitrogen  loss  (measured)
Loss due to  precipitation runoff
Loss due to  septic tank discharge
Applied  and  fixed nitrogen  loss

Percent  applied and fixed nitrogen lost
  1975        1976
  	kg	
286,800
 42,700
329,500
 87,400
 14,100
  7,300
 66,000

   20%
286,800
 29,700
316,500
 22,700
  5,800
  6,200
 10,700

    3%
ginating as commercial fertilizer or manure was estimated to average  about
0.3 percent per year for 1975 and 1976.

     The estimated loss of soluble inorganic nitrogen from commercial  fer-
tilizers  or manures is in line with estimated losses from other areas with
similar application rates.  The loss of added phosphorus in a soluble  form
is  relatively  low and suggests that most of it was immediately tied up in
the soil complex.  However, more phosphorus could be expected  to  be  lost
through  the  erosion process.  We did not attempt to evaluate this because
of our imprecise knowledge of where erosion was occurring  in  relation  to
the areas which received phosphorus fertilization.

     The total nitrogen loss per hectare from the Smith-Fry Drain was  only
about  20  percent  higher  than  from the Dreisbach Drain (see Table 109).
However, the percentage of the drainage area of the Smith-Fry Drain in  row
crops  was  about double that for the Dreisbach Drain.  It is probably rea-
sonable to expect that most of this difference was  due  to  the  increased
usage  of  commercial  fertilizers  on the lands contributing runoff to the
                                                                 DISCUSSION

-------
270
Smith-Fry Drain.  Improved fertilizer management techniques may  still  de-
crease  the  amounts  of soluble inorganic nitrogen reaching the streams in
the Black Creek Watershed, but the level to which it can be reduced is cer-
tainly  bounded  and  the effect of improved techniques may not be all that
noticeable in loadings from the watershed into the Maumee River.

5.2.1.3.9 Another Factor — The Farming Community

     The Black Creek Watershed is somewhat atypical of similar sized  areas
in  the  Maumee Basin in relation to its comparatively larger settlement of
Amish farmers.  Most of them have farms on the glacial till soils which oc-
cur in the northern part of the watershed.  The land farmed by the Amish in
the drainage areas of the Smith-Fry and Dreisbach Drains is roughly in pro-
portion  to  the  percentages of glacial till soils in these two areas  (see
Table 108).  Some aspects of their farming operations which  would  have  a
beneficial  effect on the level of non-point source pollution from agricul-
tural lands were  (1) a rotational type agriculture which  included  pasture
and  small  grains  and   (2) limited usage of commercial fertilizers.  Some
negative factors were (1) fall plowing of erosive soils, (2) overgrazing of
pastures,  (3)  low  crop yields which would increase the erosion potential
from their farms, and (4) use of streams for watering livestock.

     The lands which are farmed by the Amish are in general mostly rolling.
Practices for reducing nonpoint source pollution are particularly effective
on these lands.  As reported elsewhere in this volume, good cooperation was
generated  with the Amish community and many beneficial practices including
parallel tile outlet terraces have been installed on their farms.

     During the period of record reported on here, however, and in particu-
lar for 1975, very few of these practices had been installed.  Based on our
records and also on observation of lands on which severe erosion was occur-
ring, we have concluded that the 19th century farming techniques as used by
the Amish did not seem to improve the water quality in  streams  from   that
area of the Black Creek watershed in which they reside.  On the other hand,
we expected the greatest reduction of nonpoint source pollution  from   that
area  in  the future.  We have in the Black Creek Watershed a unique oppor-
tunity to study "old and modern" agriculture and their relative effects  on
the quality of our water resources.  Further analyses will be made based on
our water sampling program and also on our modeling effort as  reported  in
Section 0.0.

5.2.1.3.10 Effect of Agricultural NFS Pollution

     The actual impact of sediment, phosphorus and nitrogen discharged  from
the  Black  Creek Watershed and other agricultural watersheds in the Maumee
Basin on the eutrophication process in the Maumee River and  Lake  Erie is
speculative  and needs further study.  Phosphorus is largely sediment-bound
and would have  to be released  in order to enter into the nutrient cycle of
the algal biomass.  In a  study reported elsewhere in this report only about
15 percent of  the phosphorus which was  bound  to  sediments  could  become
available  for  algae  growth.   This  was for a laboratory situation where
light was not  limiting as it would in fact be in a lake  environment.   Re-
garding  nitrogen,  a large percentage of the total nitrogen discharged oc-
curs  in  the late  winter  and spring months during high  flows.  Just how  much
would  remain   and  be   available  later  in  the year for usage  by the algal
 DISCUSSION

-------
                                                                        271
biomass is also largely unknown at this time.

     Nonpoint source pollution from the Black Creek Watershed  occurs  pri-
marily  from  large  storm  events.  These large storm events usually occur
during the spring and early summer months.  Also the chances are  that  the
Maumee River is at a moderately high stage during the period when the large
storm event occurs.  On the other hand, the input of point source pollution
is  most  critical  in the Maumee River during its low flow periods.  While
there may be some residual chemicals remaining from high flow periods,  the
effect of agricultural nonpoint source pollution by-and-large should not be
evaluated using low flow criteria as is  characteristic  for  point  source
pollution.

     Conclusion: The effects of agricultural nonpoint source pollution  and
point  source  pollution  on our water resources are sufficiently different
that direct comparisons between them can not be made  and  separate  objec-
tives for their evaluation and control are in order.

5.2.1.4 SUMMARY

     An analysis of rainfall, runoff, and transported  nutrients  from  the
Black  Creek  Watershed  for 1975 and 1976 was made.  Rainfall was about 20
percent over normal in 1975 and, to the other  extreme,  about  20  percent
less  than normal in 1976.  We were fortunate from a data collection stand-
point to have experienced these extreme rainfall conditions since there  is
no  guarantee that a much longer period of record would have produced these
rather extreme weather conditions.  Future years of record will be used  to
verify our conclusions.

                                 References
1.  Geological Survey.  1971.  Water Resources  Data  for  Ohio.   Part  1.
Surface  Water  Records.  U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C.
223p.

2.  Monke, E.J., D.B. Beasley, and A.B. Bottcher.  1975.  Sediment  Contri-
butions to the Maumee River.  EPA-905/9-75-007, Proc. Non-Point Source Pol-
lution Seminar, November 20, 1975 in Chicago, IL. pp.71-85.

3.  Bremner, J.M. and D.R. Keeney.  1965.  Steam distillation  methods  for
determination  of ammonium, nitrate, and nitrite.  Anal. Chem. Acta 32:485-
495.

4.  Nelson, D.W. and L.E. Sommers.  1975.  Determination of total  nitrogen
in natural waters.  ,J. Environ. Quality 4:465-468.

5.  Murphy, J. and J.P. Riley.  1962.  A modified  single  solution  method
for  determination  of  phosphate  in  natural  waters.   Anal.  Chem. Acta
27:254-267.

6.  Sommers, L.E. and D.W. Nelson.  1972.   Determination  of  total  phos-
phorus  in  soils:  A rapid perchloric acid digestion procedure.  Soil Sci.
Soc. Amer. Proc.  36:902-904.
                                                                 DISCUSSION

-------
272


7.  Schwab, G.O., E.G. McLean, A.C.  Waldron, R.K.  White, and S.W.   Michner.
1973.   Quality  of drainage water from a heavy textured soil.  Trans. ASAE
16(6): 1104-1107.

8.  Brooks, R.M. and D.L. Taylor.  1975.  Leadership  important  to  accep-
tance  of conservation.  EPA-905/9-76-006, Environmental Impact of Land Use
on Water Quality,  pp. 155-196.

5.3  LOCAL VARIATIONS  IN WATER QUALITY

     Water quality in the Black  Creek  watershed  varies  strikingly  over
space  and  time.   Spatial  variation results from differing typographies,
soil types, land use, and channel characteristics.  Temporal variation  in-
cludes changes due to the seasons with added variation due to changing flow
regimes.  The following discussion illustrates several patterns  of  varia-
tion.

5.3.1 Water Quality During a Drought

     The Black Creek watershed experienced a prolonged dry period in summer
1976 and, thus, provided an excellent opportunity to determine water quali-
ty characteristics at base flow.  During this period rainfall  events  were
generally  less than one inch and were quickly absorbed by dry soil result-
ing in very little or no surface runoff.  Most  suspended  solids  and  nu-
trients  carried  in Black Creek were from within streams, drain tiles, and
domestic sewage sources.  Furthermore, by late summer most of  the  streams
in the watershed were reduced to isolated pools with no surface flow.

     Because of the low flow conditions on the Black Creek watershed during
July,  August,  and  September 1976 it was possible to divide the watershed
into several distinct units (Figure 37).  The lower reaches of Black  Creek
had a base flow maintained by groundwater all summer.  Estimated flow rates
during these base flow  conditions  ranged  from  0.0005  to  0.0040  cubic
meters/sec.  Most of the water for this flow originates at two distinct lo-
cations; Gorrell Drain at Notestine Road and about 150  m  downstream  from
station  131   (east  of Bull Rapids road on Black Creek).  Water samples of
this outflow reflect lower phosphorus, ammonia, and turbidity  levels  than
found at downstream stations  (Table 128).  Data for Table 128 were collect-
ed on August 24 and 25 after a period of at least one  week  without  flows
from  any  tributary drain or from the upper reaches of Black Creek.  Since
there was no surface runoff or upstream channel flow, the changes in  water
chemistry  indicated by Table 128 result from the accumulation of materials
from the stream channel and riparian environment of Black Creek.  A hog wa-
tering  facility a short distance above station 132 may have been responsi-
ble for some of the changes in concentrations of  some  nutrients.   Unfor-
tunately,  we  did  not  have  any  sample stations between the groundwater
source and the hog lot.

     Two sources of pollutants in the lower section  of  Black  Creek  were
tile  lines  near  stations  140  and 154 which carried domestic sewage ef-
fluent.  No significant shifts in water  chemistry  could  be  detected  at
these  locations,  suggesting that these sources were of little consequence
in affecting water chemistry at base flow conditions.

     Immediately following the few rainfall events of summer 1976 Dreisbach
and Richelderfer Drains experienced increased runoff rates while other tri-
DISCUSSION

-------
                                                                          273
                                    TABLE 128
            Characteristics, Groundwater, Channel Flows, Black Creek
Parameter (c)
Alkalinity
Conductivity
Dissolved Solids
Hardness
Turbidity
Total Phosphorus
Soluble Orthophosphate
Nitrate
Nitrite
Ammonia
Organic Nitrogen
Total Residue
(Suspended Solids)
Sulfate
Groundwater
267
702
512
357
27
0.047
0.003
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.29

532
88.1
Stagnant Stream Water (a)
268.7 +- 6.35
783.7 +- 35.01
571.3 +- 25.00
358.3 +- 3.51
58.0 +- 4.00(b)
0.64 +- 0.02(b)
0.04 +- 0.008(b)
0.01
0.01
0.087 +- 0.005(b)
0.313 +- 0.095

578.7 22.7
88.8 1.15
   (a)  Stations  132-134, Mean +- standard deviation
   (b)  Groundwater and channel  flow concentrations significantly
       different at p<0.05
   (c)  mg/1 except turbidity in Jackson Turbidity Units
butaries were little affected by the rains.  These intermittent flows iden-
tify  a second major area of the watershed: areas with very low flow or in-
termittent flow through most of the summer but  with  an  occasional  spate
originating  in  Harlan  (Figure  37).  We do not have any regular sampling
stations on Richelderfer Drain near Harlan but  a  series  of  stations  on
Dreisbach  Drain yields interesting results.  Virtually all water chemistry
parameters increase sharply as the stream passes Harlan (Stations  115  and
116).   As  the stream continues south beyond Harlan all parameters decline
                                                                   DISCUSSION

-------
274
         Base Flow
         "Harlen" Flow
         "No Flow"
         Summer, 1976
   Stagnant Pools
       Organic Pollution

       Clean Water
                      Figure  37  Flow Regimes in Watershed
 DISCUSSION

-------
                                                                        275
 and reach levels similar  to those above Harlan.   This generally happens  at
 or  slightly below station 118  about 1  km south of Harlan.   This seems to be
 a result of settling out  of organic matter  between stations  115  and  118.
 Apparently,  this  particulate  matter  cannot be metabolized by the stream
 ecosystem during low flow periods.   It accumulates in  anaerobic  sediments
 and  is  later   washed  downstream during rainfall events  (see discussion of
 microbiological  sampling).   A  population of fish is able  to persist at sta-
 tion 118 but very few persist  above that sample  station.

      The dynamics of nutrients in this section of stream   are  less  clear.
 Perhaps  the decline  in  nutrients  is due  to  incorporation into algal
 biomass, which settles  to the  bottom.   It is then flushed   out  with  other
 organic matter during runoff events.

      Observations of Richelderfer Drain in  late  September  and October indi-
 cate that channel flow  from Harlan is  considerably more turbid than that in
 the main Black Creek channel.

      The third major situation in the  watershed  existed upstream of  Harlan
 on   the  Dreisbach  and  throughout Wertz and  Smith-Fry Drains.   Generally,
 flow conditions  in these  areas were very low or  stagnant.   Upper  Dreisbach
 (above   station   113)   remained dry through much of the summer (Table 129).
 Some flow occurred in Smith-Fry Drain  in late  June and  July and  flow  rates
 in  Wertz Drain were lower  and  more  intermittent.   Most  areas along the tri-
 butaries were reduced to  standing pools many of  which dried  up   completely
 by   the  end of the summer.   This  resulted in progressive concentration of
 fishes  and ultimately death for  many as  habitat  deterioration   made  them
 especially  susceptible  to raccoon   and other  predators.   The  most severe
 condition occurred in early September  when   the   isolated   pools  could  be
 classed  into two groups.   Many pools were maintained  by  septic tile flows
 which commonly contained  significant amounts of  organic effluents  (Figure
 37).    Pools in  areas  not  receiving such effluent maintained relatively
 better  water quality.
                                 TABLE 129
                   Stations with Water - Dreisbach Drain


Stream Segment
Upper Segment
(Springfield
Center to
Antwerp Roads
Lower Segment

Total Number
of Stations



11
9
No
June
10



2
0
. of Stations Without Water
June July July Aug
29 13 26 9



4899
0010
On
Aug
24



10
4
5.3.2 Effects of Channel Morphology

     The general program of water sampling in the  Black  Creek  Study  in-
volves  routine  and often automated sampling of water at a number of loca-
tions around the watershed.  This sampling protocol has  been  supplemented
                                                              DISCUSSION

-------
276
   with   detailed  surveys of water quality throughout the  watershed.   Initial-
   ly, we sampled  the  segment of Wertz Drain between  Knouse  and Antwerp Roads.
   Between  those   two roads there is about 1800 m of stream channel,  of which
   about 550 m meanders through a small patch of mixed forest.  Tree dominants
   in the forest include oaks  (Quercus),  hickories (Carya),  maples (Acer),  and
   beech (Fagus).   Within the 1800 m section of stream,   12  sample   stations
    (later  expanded to 16)  were established.  Three upstream stations  (#10-12)
   are in a region of  grass waterway bordered by agricultural land.    Stations
   6-9  are  within the main woodlot area and 4-5 are in  a  small extension of
   forest bordering the stream. The remaining stations (1-3)  are in a  region
   of grass waterway bordered by agricultural land.  Station 2 is on a bend in
   the stream in an area with several large cottonwoods  (Populus).    A  steep
   badly  eroded  bank  is  located just above station 2.   Inside  the forest no
   grass stabilizes the bank, and the stream forms a  complex of pools  and rif-
   fles   meandering widely through the  forest.   Just below station 7 a badly
   eroded tile drain enters the main channel.

         Since February 1975 we  have  collected water samples  regularly  from the
   Wertz  Drain.   Briefly  our  results demonstrate that sediment  loads decline
   as the water flows  through the area.    Furthermore,  very  soon after  the
   stream  leaves   the  forest, sediment load increases and stabilizes near a
   level characteristic of  the  Wertz Drain above  the  forest.

         Variations within the agricultural and forested section of the  stream
   are  also of interest.   For  example, a typical  increase at station  5 is ap-
   parently due to the nearby entry  of  a  large drainage  tile  from   adjacent
    fields.  Considerable erosion is  evident at that point.  Note  that  even the
   presence of a small finger of forest extending  south from station  5 results
    in  a decline of sediment load  to station 3.  As the stream continues south
    to station 2 sediment loads  increase significantly until  they approach lev-
    els above those in  the forest.

         A series of t-tests to  determine  the significance  of variation in sed-
    iment loads shows that stations  above  the forest are not significantly dif-
    ferent in suspended solid content from the lower  two  stations.    Stations
    10-12,  and  1-2 are significantly higher than stations at the lower end of
    the forest  (stations 4 and  6)  indicating that the forest acts as an  effec-
    tive sediment trap in reducing  suspended solids by about 28%.

         At very high stream flows,  the forest apparently has little impact  on
    reducing  sediment  loads.   We obtained water samples shortly after a very
    heavy rain  (about 10 cm in 2 hours)  in 20 May 1975.  From station 12  to   1
    there  was  a  gradual  increase in suspended solids through the Wertz Drain
    Study Area.  Furthermore,  the increased  load of sediment seems to be a gen-
    eral phenomenon as the load increased  from the headwaters of the streams to
    near the junction of Black Creek and the Maumee River.   These results  sug-
    gest  that  the forest acts as a very efficient trap for removing suspended
   . solids during most flow rates (>95%, Beasley, pers. comm.) but at very high
    flow rates  the forest has no value as a  sediment trap.

         Initially, we were not able to determine the factors  responsible  for
    declining   sediment  loads.    However,   we  are now convinced that sediment
    reductions  are due to the physical processes obtaining in the forested sec-
    tion  of  the watershed.  From unit stream power theory  sediment reductions
    on the order of 25% are expected in a  meandering  pool-and-riffle  channel
    like  that   in  Wertz  Woods  and observed sediment declines were 28%.  The
    DISCUSSION

-------
                                                                       277


roughness coefficient (n) is the likely  factor  responsible  for  the  de-
creased  sediment  loads  since  the  slopes (S) are lower  (.25 ) above and
below the woodlot than in the woodlot (.40).

5.3.3 Variations in Water Quality

     From an initial sampling base of 12 stations on a small section of the
Wertz  Drain we have expanded to an intensive series of 120 sample stations
throughout the Black Creek  watershed  (Figure  0).   These  stations  were
selected to allow intensive sampling on four major areas of the watershed.

     1.  Dreisbach Drain.  Since the initiation of the Black Creek Sediment
Control Project, Dreisbach Drain has been the subject of intense efforts to
improve agricultural and conservation practices.  A series  of  20  channel
stations  between Springfield Center and Brush College Roads has been esta-
blished to monitor the impact of changes in agricultural  and  conservation
practices on water quality.

     2.  Wertz Drain.  Our original sampling included 12  stations  between
Knouse  and  Antwerp  Roads.  The number of stations in that reach has been
expanded to 16 and an additional 18  stations  have  been  located  in  the
remainder  of the Wertz Drain between Boger Road and Black Creek.  This ex-
pansion is designed to clarify the changes in stream quality resulting from
several planned conservation activities initiated in the summer of 1976.

     3.  Smith-Fry Drain.  Little or no conservation planning work had been
initiated on the Smith-Fry Drain by summer 1976.  As a result, water quali-
ty in this channel may reflect that of other Black Creek tributaries before
initiation  of  the  Black  Creek  Sediment Control Project.  A total of 23
channel stations is located along the Smith-Fry Drain.

     4.  Black Creek.  Thirty-two stations  have  been  located  along  the
Black  Creek  channel between Brush College Road and the Maumee River.  The
deeper waters and increasing flow volumes of the Black Creek  channel  will
help  to  clarify the dynamics of sediment and nutrient movements in larger
streams.

     In addition to these stations  a  number  of  other  sites  have  been
selected  to  measure  such  areas  as  tile  outflows from fields with and
without parallel tile outlet terrace systems.  The sample  sites  for  this
expanded effort have been selected to sample areas of different stream mor-
phology, land use, vegetation cover, and other factors.

     As demonstrated by earlier studies of  the  Wertz  Woods  area,  local
variation in streamside vegetation, channel morphology, and land use affect
water quality characteristics.  Water quality varies strikingly within  and
between waterways within the Black Creek watershed (Table 130).  At present
all of the cause and effect relationships which account for this  variation
are not known.

     However, some small scale variation can be accounted for.  At  station
189  at  the  lower  end of Wertz Drain suspended solids loads increased by
about 200/mg/l as a result of domestic ducks feeding in the channel at that
location.

     In the case of phosphorus spikes are especially high at  Harlan  where


                                                              DISCUSSION

-------
 278
                                 TABLE 130
              Water Quality Characteristics - Major Segments
Parameter
Phosphorus
Total Phosphorus
Soluble
Or thophosphate
Nitrogen
Nitrate
Nitrite
Ammonia
Organic Nitrogen
Other Parameters
Turbidity
Total Residue
(Susp. Solids)
Alkalinity
Hardness
Conductivity
Dissolved Solids
Sulfate
Dreisbach
High
High
Very High
Very High
Very High
Very High

I
High
High
High
High
High
High
Stream Segment Index
Wertz Smith-Fry Black Creek Value*
Low
Very Low
Very High
I
Low
I

Low
Low
High
I
Low
Low
Low
Very Low
Very Low
High
High
Low
Low

Low
Low
I
High
Low
Low
Low
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
(D)**
(D)
(D)
(D)



(D)
(D)
(D)

0.70
0.15
0.01
0.03
0.40
0.50

50
600
140
220
700
500
30
** I=Index Value
   (D) = Decreasing trend through this segment of the watershed.
 * Concentration in water in mg/1 except for turbidity which is measured
   in Jackson Turbidity Units.


concentrations are up to 10 and 100 times higher than the index  value  for
total phosphorus and soluble orthophosphate, respectively.

     We are conducting analysis and continuing monitoring efforts to demon-
strate how specific land use and channel characteristics affect water qual-
ity parameters.  However, one point is clear.  Variation  in  sediment  and
nutrient loads over short stream distances may be striking for a  large com-
plex of reasons.  Clearly, when sediment and nutrient  loads  may  vary  by
orders of magnitude over relatively short distances, it is important to use
caution in the selection of sampling localities  for  monitoring   of  water
quality.   This  is  obviously  true where point-source inputs are present.
However, evidence that channel structure and other factors have effects  on
transport and deposition suggests that care should be taken in selection of
monitoring sites even where non-point sources predominate.  Ideally, a  set
of  recommendations  should be developed to aid researchers in selection of
monitoring sites.  At the present time it is only possible to suggest  that
caution be exercised.  Concentration and loading estimates will be affected

DISCUSSION

-------
                                                                    279


by carelessness in site selection.

5.3.4 Effects of Construction Activities

     Short term effects of construction may cause  significant  changes  in
water  quality.  Activities of heavy equipment in pulling channel banks and
bottom-dipping commonly created visible changes in water quality.  This  is
especially true of suspended solids which increase markedly downstream from
construction areas.

5.3.5 Effects of Conservation Practices

     As discussed in Section 0.0.6, channel modification activities on  the
Wertz  Bank  upstream from Wertz Woods on Wertz Drain has had a significant
affect on downstream channel characteristics.  Erosion of unstable bank and
channel  bottom after construction in Wertz Branch yielded large amounts of
sediment.  As this sediment moved downstream it was deposited in downstream
areas   (especially  Wertz  Woods).  This deposition has all but obliterated
many of the pool and riffle areas.   Implementation  of  this  conservation
practice has over the short term  increased sediment loads and affected down
stream biotic communities by destroying several habitat  types   (pools  and
riffles)  and  by creating very unstable substrates (shifting sand and silt
bottoms) in a number of downstream reaches.

     Another example of a conservation  practice  affecting  water  quality
comes  from the desilting basin constructed on the main Black Creek Channel
below Station 15.  While large amounts of sand have been deposited in  this
basin  since  its  construction  our  data show that during low flows total
residue, total phosphorus and turbidity are  significantly  higher  at  the
outlet  than  at  the entry of the basin  (Table 131).  Total residue is in-
creased by 8% while total phosphorus and turbidity increase by 58% and  41%
respectively.   The  ratio of total residue to turbidity declines from sta-
tion 145 to 146.  This ratio can be viewed as coefficient  of  fineness  of
suspended materials where a decreasing value indicates increased proportion
of fine particles in suspension.  The reason for this cannot be  definitely
established  but  may  be due to  such factors as increased turbidity due to
wind fetch or feeding activities of fish  although  feeding  activities  of
fish  seems  unlikely  as  ammonia  levels do not increase in the desilting
basin.  Another possibility  is   that  algal  populations  have  increased.
Without  knowledge of carbon fractions, it is difficult to distinguish that
possibility from the more likely effect of wind fetch.  The desilting basin
seems to be functioning as a turbid pond.

     The accumulation of sand size particles in the desilting basin suggest
that  bed load is reduced by deposition in the basin but evidence described
above shows that fine particle material increases.  The rapid rate of  fil-
ling the basin with sands shows that regular maintenance activities will be
required to maintain  an  efficient  operation.   Such  costly,  repetitive
maintenance  combined  with the high sediment movement associated with con-
struction and increased fine particle concentrations  associated  with  the
basin suggest that this may not be a sound practice for improvements in wa-
ter quality.
                                                              DISCUSSION

-------
                                   TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
                            (Please read Instructions on the reverse before completing)
1. REPORT NO.
  EPA-905/9-77-007-B
             3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION NO.
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
  Environmental Impact of Land Use on Water Quality-
  Final Report on the Black Creek Project (Volume  2-
  Tehnical Report)
             5. REPORT DATE

                        1 Q77
             6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
7. AUTHOR(S)

  James B. Morrison- Technical Writer and Editor
             8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
  Allen County  Soil and Water Conservation District
  Executive Park,  Suite 103
  2010 Inwood Drive
  Fort Wayne, Indiana 46805
              10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.

               2RA645	
              11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.


               EPA Grant G005103
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS

  U.S. Environmental Protection Agecy
  Great Lakes National Program Office
  230 South Dearborn Street
  Chicago. Illinois 60604	
              13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
               Final  Report-1972-1977
              14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
  Carl D. Wilson- EPA Project Officer
  Ralph G. Christensen- Section 108  (a)  Program Coordinator
16. ABSTRACT
  This is the Final Technical Report of the Black Creek sediment control project. This
  project is to determine the environmental impact of  land use on water quality and has
  completed its four and one half years of watershed activity. The project,  which is
  directed, by the Mien County Soil  and Water Conservation District, is an attempt
  to determine  the role that agricultural pollutants play in the degradation of water
  quality in the Maumee River Basin  and ultimately in  Lake Erie.
17.
                                KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
                  DESCRIPTORS
b.IDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS  C.  COSATI Field/Group
  Sediment
  Erosion
  Land Use
  Water Quality
  Nutrients
  Socio-Economic
  Land Treatment
18. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
                                               19. SECURITY CLASS (ThisReport)
                                                                          21. NO. OF PAGES
  Document is  available to the public
  through the  National Technical  Infor-
  mation Service,  Springfield, VA 22161
20. SECURITY CLASS (Thispage)
                            22. PRICE
EPA Form 2220-1 (Rev. 4-77)
                       PREVIOUS EDITION IS OBSOLETE
                                                                * U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1978—753-066

-------