vvEPA
             United States
             Environmental Protection
             Agency
            Great Lakes
            National Program Office
            536 South Clark Street
            Chicago, Illinois 60605
EPA 905/9-80-006-A
September 1980
Post-Pluarg Evaluation
Of Great Lakes Water
Quality Management
Studies and  Programs
            Volume I

-------
                                   FOREWORD

The United States Environmental  Protection Agency was created because of
increasing public and governmental  concern about the dangers of pollution
to the health and welfare of the American people.  Noxious air, foul  water,
and spoiled land are tragic testimony to the deterioration of our  natural
environment.

The Great Lakes National  Program Office (GLNPO) of the U.S.  EPA, was.
established in Region V,  Chicago to provide a specific focus on the water
quality concerns of the Great Lakes.   GLNPO provides funding and personnel
support to the International Joint  Commission activities under the U.S.-
Canada Great Lakes Water  Quality Agreement.

Under the terms of the Agreement a  series of studies were funded to examine
the relationship between  land use and water quality.  The studies  were con-
ducted by the IJC Pollution from Land Use Activities Reference Group (PLUARG),
In order to further build upon the  accomplishments of the PLUARG effort,
GLNPO contracted with the Great  Lakes Basin Commission to prepare  this
report which describes the work  which is continuing to address the problem
of pollution from land.

We hope that the information and data contained herein will  help planners
and managers of pollution control agencies make better decisions for
carrying forward their pollution control responsibilities.

                              Madonna F. McGrath
                              Director
                              Great Lakes National Program Office

-------
                                                      EPA-905/9-80-006-A
                                                      March  1980
                  POST-PLUARG  EVALUATION OF GREAT  LAKES

             WATER  QUALITY MANAGEMENT STUDIES AND PROGRAMS

                                 Volume  I

                                    by
                           Rose  Ann  C.  Sullivan
                             Paul  A.  Sanders
                           William C.  Sonzogni
                    Great  Lakes  Basin  Commission  Staff
                           Ann Arbor,  Michigan

                                  for

                   U.S.  Environmental  Protection  Agency
                            Chicago, Illinois
                             Project  Officer
                               Kent Fuller
                   Great Lakes National  Program Office
              Prepared for the Great Lakes National  Program
              Office, EPA, in partial  fulfillment of U.S.
              Environmental  Protection Agency Interagency
              Agreement No.   EPA-79-D-F0857 with the Great
              Lakes Basin Commission.
This report presents information based in part on the result to date of
Great Lakes Water Quality Management studies.   Because these studies are
ongoing, the findings and conclusions in this  report will  need to be
periodically updated to reflect progress that  has been made.  This report
is intended to promote discussion and further  coordination of Great Lake
planning effort.

                   GREAT LAKES NATIONAL PROGRAM OFFICE
              U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, REGION V
                     536 SOUTH CLARK STREET, ROOM 932
                         CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60605

-------
                       ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors express  their  appreciation  to Timothy Monteith and
Thomas Heidtke of the Great Lakes Basin Commission staff, and
to William Skimin,  formerly of  the  Basin Commission staff, for
their assistance with this report.   We also wish to thank the
numerous  federal,  state,   and  regional agency  personnel who
contributed information.   The  secretarial  support of Ann  Davis
is very much appreciated  as well.
                          DISCLAIMER
This study was carried out by the Great  Lakes  Basin  Commission
staff in partial  fulfillment of  an Interagency Agreement  with
the  Great  Lakes  National  Program Office, U.S.  Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA).   The findings,  conclusions  and
recommendations   are  those  of  the  authors  and  do   not
necessarily reflect the  views  of U.S.  EPA or the Great  Lakes
Basin Commission.
                             11

-------
                               TABLE OF CONTENTS



                                                                     Page No.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 	     i:L

DISCLAIMER	     ii

LIST OF TABLES  	     v

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 	     1

CONCLUSIONS  	     5

RECOMMENDATIONS 	    ll

1.  INTRODUCTION 	    15

2.  UPDATE ON WATER QUALITY  STUDIES AND  RESOURCE  PLANNING  AND
      MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS  	    19
         Pilot  Watershed Studies  	    19
         Lake Erie Wastewater Management  Study  	    25
         Section 108(a) Demonstration  Projects  	    27
         Cuyahoga River Restoration Study 	    27
         The Wisconsin Nonpoint  Source Water  Pollution Abatement
             Program  	    29
         Agricultural Conservation Program 	    31
         Rural  Clean Water Program  	    38
         Nationwide Urban  Runoff  Program 	.	    41
         The Soil and Water  Resources  Conservation  Act 	    41
         Update on 208 Water Quality Management Planning 	    46
             Great Lakes Basin  Commission 208  Report Bibliography 	    46
         Five Year Strategies  	    51
         U.S. Air Quality  Control Programs -  Implications  for
             Improvement of Great  Lakes Water  Quality 	    51
         Status of the Phosphorus Management  Strategies Task Force
             Recommendations  	    54

 3.   POLLUTANT LOADINGS TO  THE  LAKES  	    63
         Update on Tributary Monitoring  Projects	    63
          1977-78  River Mouth Loadings  	    65
         Overview Modeling Activities  	    68

 4.   SURVEY  OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH ON THE CAUSES AND CONTROL
       OF NONPOINT  SOURCE  POLLUTION  	    73

 5.   UPDATE  ON PLUARG FINDINGS  AND RECOMMENDATIONS  	    79

 REFERENCES    	    85
                                       ill

-------
                          TABLE OF CONTENTS (cont'd.)
                                                                     Page No.

APPENDICES

A.  Lake Erie Wastewater Management Study: Honey Creek Watershed
    Management Proj ect  	   39

B.  Section 108(a) Demonstration Projects:  The Washington County,
    Wisconsin, Project  	     99

C.  GLBC 208 Bibliography Retrieval 	   107

D.  1977-1978 River Mouth Loadings  	   113

E.  Selected Descriptions of Current Agricultural Research Projects
    on the Causes and Control of Nonpoint Source Pollution 	   123
ATTACHMENTS

1.  "Pollution from Land Runoff," feature article published in
    Environmental Science and Technology on PLUARG

2.  "An Update of Water Quality Planning Activities in the Great Lakes
    Basin - A Review of State and Areawide Agency Five-Year Strategies,
    and Work Programs"

3.  "U.S. Air Quality Control Programs - Implications for Improvement
    of Great Lakes Water Quality"

4.  "Methodology for Choosing Among Alternatives to Reduce Pollutant
    Contributions from Watersheds"
                                      IV

-------
                                 LIST OF TABLES



Table No.                                                            Page No.



    1    Status of 208 Planning in the Great Lakes Basin  	 47

    2    208 Bibliography Key Word Dictionary  	 52

    3    Documents Received  for Final Report of  the Phosphorus
         Management Strategies Task  Force as of  December  12,  1979  	 56

    4    "Best" Estimate of  1976 Phosphorus Load 	 59

    5    A  Comparison of Total Phosphorus Loadings to  the Great  Lakes  .. 60

-------

-------
                              EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
         This  report  presents  the  results  of  recent  efforts  by the  Great  Lakes
Basin  Commission   staff  to  update  and   integrate  the  findings   and
reconmendations  of  the  International  Joint  Commission's  Pollution  from  Land
Use Activities Reference  Group (PLUARG) with  other  related  studies.   It  is one
of a series of  U.S.  Post-PLUARG  activities  recommended  by  the Reference  Group
to ensure that the initiatives begun  under PLUARG are not lost.

         The report concentrates  on  four different areas:

         1.  update  of major water  quality  studies  and  resource
             planning and management programs and projects related to
             Great Lakes  water quality  concerns;

         2.  update of pollutant  loadings  to  the  Great Lakes  from U.S.
             sources;

         3.  results of a survey of current  agricultural  research into
             the causes and control of  nonpoint source pollution; and

         4.  reconsideration of PLUARG  findings and  recommendations  in
              light of new information.

 Five  appendices  and four   attachments  provide  detailed  discussions and
 information to  support this report.

         The  nonpoint  source  technical  findings  that have emerged   since
 completion of PLUARG1s  final  report generally continue to  reaffirm  the  PLUARG
 conclusions.   Some local differences  in  management  recommendations have
 emerged,  however.   For  example,  while minimum  or  no-tillage  techniques  show
 great  promise  for  reducing  sediment  and  phosphorus  losses  from  northwestern
 Ohio,  these techniques do not appear as applicable  (or  as  publicly acceptable)
 in southwestern Wisconsin.

-------
         Some  PLUARG  recommendations for  information needs  still  require
attention.   Additional  data are  needed  on  atmospheric  inputs  of  toxic
substances,  since  evidence  continues  to  mount  that  atmospheric  fallout  is
perhaps  the major  source  of  toxic  chemicals  in  the  lakes.    Additionally,
quantitative comparisons  of the incremental  water  quality benefits  and costs
associated with alternative control measures are still required.

         A  number  of  national  and  regional  financial assistance  programs  are
contributing to the development and  implementation  of nonpoint  source remedial
measures throughout the basin.  It will  be  important  to  integrate results from
these  programs  into  an overall Great  Lakes management  strategy.   An approach
such  as  the  Wisconsin  Nonpoint   Source Pollution  Abatement  Program,  which
provides  state  funding  for developing  and  implementing control  programs  for
priority watersheds,  merits consideration for use elsewhere in the basin.

         The potential  exists  for  integration  of major resource  planning  and
management  programs in the basin.    Programs administered  under  the  Clean  Air
and  Clean  Water  Acts   are  an  obvious starting  point.  A closer correspondence
also  needs to  be  developed  between  state water  quality  standards  and  the
objectives established in the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement.

         The phosphorus  management  strategy recently  suggested  by  the Great
Lakes  Basin Commission, which  calls  for  implementation (at  present)  of the 1.0
mg/L phosphorus effluent  limitation  for sewage  treatment plants  discharging  1
million  gallons  per  day  or  greater,  still  appears  to  be  desirable.   The
International Joint Commission's  Phosphorus Management  Strategies  Task Force,
which  is  in the  process  of  determining whether  or  not  a  0.5  mg/L  P limit
should  be  set,  may recommend  that municipal  plants  be  encouraged  to control
phosphorus  at   an  intermediate  level  (between 0.5 and  1.0  mg/L).    This
reduction  would  be achieved  through more  efficient  management  of  phosphorus
removal  processes.    Thus,  it  would  involve little  additional  cost.   Such  a
recommendation, if made,  is  consistent  with the Basin  Commission's  suggested
strategy.

-------
         Because  of  recent  changes   in  federal  program  direction,  Areawide
Water  Quality  Management  (208)  programs  will  likely  emphasize  projects
addressing  nonpoint  source  pollution.   It  appears  that  those programs  which
can  be  developed at  low cost  (i.e.,  voluntary programs)  are  still  the  most
desirable  in  terms  of cost-effectiveness.    Toward  this  end,  transfer of  the
information and  technology  developed by PLUARG  and  under  other  studies  (both
completed  and ongoing) will assume an even higher priority.

         While  the  five-year  strategies  of  state and  208  planning  agencies in
the  Great  Lakes basin   generally  do  not   specifically  address  Great  Lakes
concerns,  the results of their work  will  likely have  a major  impact  on the
Great Lakes.

-------

-------
                                 CONCLUSIONS
NONPOINT SOURCE  POLLUTION MANAGEMENT

 1. Results of the Pollution from Land Use Activities Reference  Group (PLUARG)
    technical  studies recently  completed  tend  to reinforce  the PLUARG
    recommendations published  in  1978.

 2. Nonpoint  pollution management recommendations  resulting  from local studies
    cannot  always  be  applied  to  other  areas.   This  is  illustrated by  the
    differences  in management recommendations,  based on  local  physical  and
    social  factors,  that  are  evident when  comparing the  Washington County,
    Wisconsin,  (108) Project  with  the partially completed Honey  Creek,  Ohio,
    Project.   For example, results  from the  Washington  County (108) Project
    indicate  that  the  water quality benefits  attributable  to  grass  waterways
    and subsurface drainage systems  in  relatively  flat watersheds  were
    minimal.    In  contrast,  studies  in  the  relatively  flat  Maumee  basin in
    northwestern  Ohio  indicated  that  such measures  had  a definite  beneficial
    water  quality  impact.

  3. Additional  information  is  needed  to  relate  the  costs  of  various
     agricultural  management practices  to  the  incremental  water quality
     benefits  obtained.

  4.  The Agricultural Conservation Program,  in conjunction  with technical
     assistance from  the  Soil  Conservation  Service,   Forest  Service,  and
     agricultural   extension  services,  appears  to  be an  effective  means of
     implementing  many  PLUARG  recommendations at the  local  level,  especially in
     the area  of sediment  control from  agricultural land use.

  5.  Objectives  and  activities  proposed  for  the new Soil and  Water Resources
     Conservation   Program  concerning  soil resources,  water  quality,  and  fish
     and  wildlife habitat  (specifically,  wetlands)  are  consistent  with
     recommendations made  by PLUARG.  Activities already  underway in the  basin,
     such  as  the  Wisconsin Nonpoint Source  Water Pollution  Abatement Program,
     may  serve  as  useful   prototypes  for future nationwide efforts  under  this
     program.

-------
 6. The  Nationwide  Urban Runoff Program  is  expected  to  provide needed
    information on  the benefits  and  effectiveness of  urban  controls so  that
    the  necessity for  controls  beyond  those  recommended by PLUARG can  be
    ascertained.

 7. Results  from  the  Washington  County  (108)  Project  indicate  that   local
    sediment control regulations  could  put resident fanners and  developers  at
    a competitive disadvantage  with  those of other areas  of  the  state.    Some
    type of minimum  statewide  standard  for regulating  erosion may,  therefore,
    be necessary.

 8. Minimum or no-till  methods,  strongly  advocated in the U.S. portion of the
    Lake Erie  basin, may  not  be  applicable  in  all parts  of  the Great  Lakes
    basin.   In contrast with preliminary  findings  from  the  Honey  Creek Project
    under  the  Lake  Erie Wastewater  Management  Study  (LEWMS),  results of  the
    Washington County  (108) Project  indicated that grain yields  from no-till
    sites  were  significantly  lower  than  from  sites  prepared by  other  plow
    methods.

 9. PLUARG1s   conclusions  regarding  the   significance  of  the   sediment
    contribution   from  developing  lands  are   substantiated  by  recent  modeling
    efforts under  the  Menomonee  Pilot  Watershed  Study  and  results   from  the
    Washington County (108) Project.

10. PLUARG1s  conclusion  that  streambank  erosion  does  not  appear  to   be  a
    significant  source of sediment  or  phosphorus  to  the   Great   Lakes  is
    substantiated  by the   initial  results of  the  Cuyahoga River Restoration
    Study which indicate that  streambank  erosion  along the Cuyahoga  is a  much
    less significant  source of  sediment  than  was  previously  thought.

11. Recent  work  involving  PLUARG1s  overview modeling  process  emphasizes  the
    importance of evaluating remedial programs on a comprehensive basis.   For
    example,  measures  to  control  phosphorus  associated  with  urban runoff may
    not  be  cost-effective  strictly in  terms of  reducing  phosphorus  loading.
    However,  urban runoff  controls may  have  other  benefits,  such as  reducing
    heavy  metal  loads, which  should  be  considered  in  a cost-effectiveness
    analysis.

-------
POINT SOURCE POLLUTION MANAGEMENT

 1. Based on  recent  information,  it  appears that the August,  1979,  resolution
    of the  Great  Lakes  Basin Commission is still appropriate.   The  resolution
    calls  for  a  phosphorus  management  strategy  that,  at present,  emphasizes
    implementation of  the 1.0 mg/L  phosphorus  effluent  limitation  for  sewage
    treatment plants discharging 1 million gallons per day or greater.

 2. The  International Joint  Commission's  Phosphorus  Management Strategies  Task
    Force  is  in the  process  of determining whether  or  not  a 0.5 mg/L P limit
    should  be  established.    They  may  recommend   that  municipal  plants  be
    encouraged  to control  phosphorus  at  an intermediate level, between 0.5 and
    1.0  mg/L,  through  more  efficient  management   of  phosphorus  removal
    processes.   Such  a recommendation,  if  made,  would  be consistent  with the
    Basin Commission's resolution.

AREAWIDE WATER QUALITY PLANNING

 1. Areawide Water Quality Management Plans (208  plans) have been prepared and
    certified  for almost  every  area of  the basin.    A  sizeable number  have
    received EPA  approval as well.   Because  they identify  management  agencies
    responsible  for water quality  improvements  at the  local  level,  these plans
    form a  comprehensive  basis on which to  build  a management  program.

 2. Generally,  the   five-year  strategies  and  work  programs  developed  by the
    Great  Lakes states  and areawide planning agencies  (208  agencies)  focus on
    (1)  point  and  nonpoint  sources  of  pollution,  (2)  residuals   and  sludge
    management,  (3)  toxics,  (4)  updating  land  use and  population projections,
    and  (5)  implementation  of  water  quality  studies.    Few  studies  are
    specifically  designed  to address Great  Lakes  issues.

 3. Due  to recent changes in  federal program  direction  for Section 208 Water
    Quality Management,  highest  funding priority   in  the  future  will  be
    assigned to  programs  addressing nonpoint source pollution.

-------
UPDATE ON POLLUTANT LOADINGS TO THE LAKES

 1. It appears  that  the loads developed  by PLUARG  (given  an  updated estimate
    of  the  Lake  Erie   load)  will  be adopted  by  the  Phosphorus  Management
    Strategies Task Force as the best  estimates of 1976 loadings to the lakes.

 2. Evidence  to  date  still  confirms  PLUARG1s   finding  that  a  substantial
    portion  of  the  phosphorus   in  tributary loadings   is  not  biologically
    available.   This  fact  must  be  taken into  account  as  future  phosphorus
    management strategies are developed.

 3. 1975  and  1976 were  years  of  very high  flows  (relative to  the  long-term
    historical  flow)  for all of  the  lakes except  Superior.   1977 was  a very
    low flow year  for all of the lakes.   In 1978,  flows returned to average or
    above  average   conditions.    Generally,  associated  tributary loadings  of
    total  phosphorus,  ortho  phosphorus,   suspended  solids, and  chloride were
    greater during water year  1978 than  1977.   In fact,  tributary  loads for
    1977 appear  to be  the lowest over the period 1975 through  1978.   (A more
    detailed  assessment of  1977   and  1978  tributary  loads  is  planned  for  a
    future report)  .

EFFECT OF U.S. AIR QUALITY CONTROL PROGRAMS ON GREAT LAKES WATER QUALITY

 1. Air  and  water  pollution  control  programs   in  the   United  States  have
    developed  independently,   resulting  in  separation  of  enforcement,
    monitoring  and administrative  responsibilities,  especially  at  the  state
    and local  levels.   As  a result,  it  may be difficult to reconcile  the two
    in areas  of common  concern  (for  example, toxic  substances entering the
    Great Lakes via air deposition).

 2. Although mechanisms  for  air and water  quality  planning coordination are
    available,  they  have been  little used.   The major  involvement of  local
    agencies,  some of which  are  preparing  areawide  (208)  water  quality plans,
    has been with  respect to transportation-related  problems.   Coordination at
    the federal  level has  been  carried  out by the  Intermodal Planning Groups
    in each federal region.

-------
3.  The Great  Lakes  states  are  in  various  stages  of  progress  in preparing
   State Implementation Plans  for  the criteria air pollutants.   There are no
   indications  at  this time  that  any  of  the  states  will not  fulfill  their
   regulatory obligations in this area.

4.  It does not  appear  that  the National Emissions Standards  for Hazardous  Air
   Pollutants  (NESHAPS)  program  will  have  a  significant  effect  on  reducing
   atmospheric  inputs  of key  hazardous substances  to  the Great Lakes,  since
   air  pollutants  regulated under the  NESHAPS  program do not appear  to  cause
   serious problems  in the  lakes.   At this time,  all  basin states  do  not have
   authority  to enforce current  NESHAPS regulations   and  several  do  not have
   authorization  to  adopt  new  standards as they are promulgated  by EPA.

 5. It  does not  appear that the  release of  PCB,  an  important  airborne  Great
   Lakes  contaminant,  can  be  effectively   controlled  through  existing  and
   proposed   air  quality  regulations.   More  information  is  needed on  the
   relative  contribution  of PCB from different sources.

-------

-------
                               RECOMMENDATIONS
         The  following  are offered as recommendations, in addition to the many
implicit  reconmendations  included  in  the  "Conclusions".

 1.  To most   effectively  reduce  nonpoint  source  pollution,   more   attention
    should be directed  toward  implementing  remedial measures.   Toward this
    end,   improvements  should  continue  to be  made in  the  areas of  technology
    and information transfer.

 2.  Nonpoint  source  control  programs which   advocate  implementation   of
    voluntary measures should be instituted immediately.

 3. Measures  should be   taken  to determine  how state,  regional,   and  local
    governments  can  keep  the  water  quality management  continuing  planning
    process  active,  as federal "208" monies are directed elsewhere.

 4. Complete implementation of  the  1.0  mg/L phosphorus limitation at municipal
    treatment plants of  1  million gallons  per  day or  greater  should continue
    to be encouraged.   The effect of  this  control measure should be carefully
    evaluated.

  5. A workshop should  be planned for the near  future to evaluate the progress
     that has  been made  toward  understanding nonpoint  source  pollution since
     the  PLUARG  report  was completed,  and  to evaluate  the progress that   has
     been made   in   implementing  nonpoint  source controls.    Invitees   should
     include  key PLUARG investigators as well as  representatives  from other  key
     nonpoint source  studies,   such  as  the  "108"  studies,  the  Lake Erie
     Wastewater Management Study,  the Nationwide  Urban Runoff Program, etc.

  6. The  "overview modeling" process should be adapted for use  by land managers
     both  within  and  outside  of  the  Great  Lakes  basin  to  aid  them  in
     determining  the most  cost-effective mix  of management  techniques for  a
     watershed.   This  could be  accomplished  by  preparation of a handbook  for
     the  land manager's use.
                                        11

-------
  7. Information  from the  large  number  of ongoing agricultural  research
     projects  addressing  nonpoint  pollution  in  the  basin  should be  used  to
     update  PLUARG  findings  and,  if  appropriate,  to  modify  strategies  for
     managing nonpoint inputs  to the Great  Lakes.

  8. To  help  maximize  utilization  of  "208"  planning  information   in   other
     Planning  and  management  activities,  a bibliography  of Great Lakes   area
     water quality  management  planning  reports  should be  completed.    Such a
     bibliography has already been  partially  prepared  by  the Great Lakes  Basin
     Commission staff.

  9.  Results  from the several  regional studies and demonstration projects which
     will  begin or be completed over  the next few years (e.g.,  the Saginaw Bay
     Special  Project,  and  the  Saline Valley Project) should  be  utilized  in the
     evolution   and  maintenance  of  a  Great  Lakes  management  strategy.
     Additionally,   as  mentioned  in  the  first  Post-PLUARG   report,   the
     feasibility  of  the  Wisconsin  Nonpoint  Source  Water Pollution  Abatement
     Program  approach to  developing and  implementing  nonpoint   source  control
     programs  for priority  watersheds  should be evaluated  for use  elsewhere in
     the basin.

10.  Results  from the U.S.  Post-PLUARG tributary  monitoring  programs,  such as
     those  in  Ohio  and  Wisconsin,  should be integrated  into  the  overall  PLUARG
     data base.

11. Better coordination is  needed between  air  and  water  quality  planning  and
    management programs.   Inclusion of air  pollution control  programs in  state-
    EPA agreements  and  five-year  strategies would  be  an  important first  step
    in achieving this.    The  potential  role  of  local  water quality  planning
    agencies  in air pollution  control  programs should also  be explored.

12. Research   and  planning  activities  aimed   at  clarifying  the  sources   and
    impacts of  airborne  contaminants  (particularly PCBs)  to the  Great  Lakes
    should be expanded.   Of special concern are toxic substances not currently
    included   or  proposed   for  NESHAPS  control.   Evidence  is   mounting   that
    atmospheric fallout  is the  major  source of toxic  substances to the Great
    T _ 1	
    Lakes.
                                       12

-------
13.  Efforts to  reduce atmospheric  emissions of  PCBs should  place additional
    emphasis  on  landfill  disposal   sites.    NESHAPS-type  controls  should  be
    implemented where feasible.
                                         13

-------

-------
                                   CHAPTER  1
                                  INTRODUCTION
         The multimillion  dollar  study  conducted  by  the  International  Joint
Commission's Pollution  from  Land  Use Activities Reference  Group (PLUARG)  was
initiated as  a result  of  the 1972  United  States-Canadian  Agreement on  Great
Lakes Water  Quality.    It  was one of  the most  extensive  studies of  nonpoint
sources of  pollution ever conducted  (see  Attachment  l).  PLUARG's final report
was  presented  to  the  U.S.-Canadian International  Joint Commission (IJC)  in
July of  1978.    The  IJC has  completed  their review of PLUARG's  findings  and
recommendations, but their comments are not yet  available.

         Under an  Interagency Agreement  with  the U.S.  Environmental  Protection
Agency (EPA),  the Great  Lakes  Basin  Commission  (GLBC),  in cooperation  with the
Great Lakes  National Program  Office  (GLNPO) of  EPA,  has undertaken a number of
activities  to  ensure   that  the  findings and  recommendations  of PLUARG  are
considered  and incorporated  into  ongoing water  quality planning and  management
programs  in the basin.   The  first  Post-PLUARG report, entitled "Post-PLUARG
Evaluation  of  Great  Lakes Water Quality  Management  Studies,"  was completed in
July of  1979  (Skimin  et al._, 1979).   This  report  updates  a number  of work
efforts  initiated  under the  previous  Agreement  and  provides  information on
recent activities, both  completed and ongoing.

         Chapter 2  of  this report provides updated  information on a number of
significant  studies  and programs of  relevance to  Great  Lakes  water  quality
problems.   Results  of  PLUARG pilot watershed  studies that  have recently become
available  are  described.   Recent  developments from  the  U.S.  Army  Corps of
Engineers'  Lake Erie Wastewater Management   Study  (LEWMS)  are discussed.
Recent  efforts under  the  Wisconsin  Nonpoint  Source Water  Pollution Abatement
Program  (Wisconsin  Fund)   and  the   Corps of  Engineers'   Cuyahoga  River
Restoration Study  are  presented.
                                        15

-------
         A number of  nationwide  programs  are  currently addressing the  problem
of  nonpoint   source   pollution  either  directly  or  indirectly.     Chapter  2
includes reviews of  projects  being  conducted  in  the  basin under the  auspices
of  the  Rural  Clean  Water  Program,  the Agricultural  Conservation Program and
the Nationwide Urban  Runoff  Program.   A draft  appraisal  and  program  plan for
soil and  water  conservation  under  the  Soil  and  Water Resources Conservation
Act  (RCA)  of  1977  has  recently  been  released   by   the  U.S.  Department  of
Agriculture.   Objectives  and program  activities  outlined  in  this  report are
reviewed in light of PLUARG's recommendations.

         Chapter 2 also presents updated  information  on the status of Section
208 water  quality management  planning  activities   underway  in  the basin.  The
function of  the five-year  strategies  in  the  planning  process  is  discussed.
The bibliography of  208  documents  being  prepared by  the  Basin Commission  is
described.   This work effort is  expected  to continue over  the next few months.

         The potential for  improvement  of Great Lakes water quality  resulting
from implementation of U.S. air quality control programs,  is discussed in this
section.   Although  the final  report  of  the  Phosphorus Management  Strategies
Task Force has   not  yet  been  completed,   several  preliminary  subreports  have
been  developed.   Major   conclusions  reached  in these  reports   have  been
summarized.

         Chapter 3 describes  current  efforts  to  assess  pollutant loadings  to
the  Great   Lakes  from  U.S.  sources.     The  status  of  tributary   monitoring
programs recommended  by PLUARG  is  discussed.    Recent  work efforts,  under the
Great  Lakes  Environmental  Planning  Study   (GLEPS),  utilizing  the  overview
modeling  process  are  reviewed  and  summarized.   The  modeling  process's
potential  for  use  as a  planning  tool  outside  of  the Great  Lakes  basin  is
discussed.   River mouth loadings calculated by  GLBC staff  for  water  years 1977
and 1978 are also presented.

         The results  of a  survey of current  research  efforts  into  the causes
and  control  of  nonpoint  source pollution are  presented  in  Chapter  4.   The
survey   focused on  agricultural   research  activities   being conducted  at
universities  and  research  stations,   primarily   in   the  Great  Lakes  basin.

                                       16

-------
Findings  of  projects particularly  relevant to  Post-PLUARG interests  are
discussed and future  research  needs  highlighted.

         Finally,   Chapter  5  attempts  to  draw  everything  together.    Study
findings, conclusions and recommendations which support or contradict those of
PLUARG are highlighted.

         A great deal of additional  information has  been  included  in a series
of five Appendices.  Also, because  portions of this  final  report were supplied
to  the  Great Lakes  National  Program  Office  as  they  were  completed,  it  was
judged to be more  expeditious to  include  these self-contained  sub-reports as a
series of four Attachments.
                                       17

-------
                                   CHAPTER 2

             UPDATE  ON WATER QUALITY  STUDIES AND RESOURCE PLANNING
                            AND MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS
         The first Post-PLUARG report (Skimin et al.,  1979) discussed a number
of water  quality  studies and  programs  in the  process  of developing detailed
information on  the  causes  and  control  of  nonpoint  source  pollution.   These
included  the  PLUARG  pilot  watershed  studies,  the  Lake  Erie  Wastewater
Management Study,  the 108(a) Demonstration Projects and the Wisconsin Nonpoint
Source Water Pollution Abatement Program (Wisconsin Fund) on  a  regional level;
and  the  Nationwide  Urban Runoff  Program and Rural  Clean Water  Program  on  a
national  level.   This chapter  updates  information contained  in the previous
Post-PLUARG report  and  describes  a  number  of  additional  studies and programs
which   are   addressing   problems   relevant   to  Post-PLUARG   interests.
Additionally,  initial  information available from  the  work  of  the  Phosphorus
Management Strategy Task Force is  reviewed  and  summarized.

PILOT WATERSHED STUDIES

         Task  C  of  the  Pollution  from Land  Use Activities  Reference Group
(PLUARG) was  to determine the  locations  and  characteristics  of  diffuse  sources
of  pollutants  entering   the  Great  Lakes   basin  from  a  range  of  land   use
activities.   The  relative  significance  of  the pollutants and processes
involved  in  their  transmission  to  the  lakes   were  to be  identified.   Pilot
watersheds  representative  of physiographic  features and  land uses  present  in
the basin were  selected  for  intensive investigation.   Summaries  of  these eight
studies were  completed  at  the time PLUARG reported to  the  International Joint
Commission  (IJC).    Since   then,   a number  of  detailed  reports  have   been
published.
                                       19

-------
Menomonee River Pilot Watershed Study

         The Menomonee  River watershed  in  Wisconsin was  selected  to  examine
the diffuse  source contributions  of  urban-residential   land  uses.  A  summary
report was  published  in May, 1978.  Since  then,  a number of draft  reports  of
detailed  studies  have  become  available.    The  draft  reports  on groundwater
hydrology and  atmospheric  chemistry were  reviewed in  "Post-PLUARG  Evaluation
of Great  Lakes Water Quality Management  Studies"  (Skitnin et al. ,  1979).   Two
additional reports have been received since then.

         A  detailed  study  was  put out  in  October,  1979, on  the  effects  of
inputs from  the Menomonee,  Milwaukee and Kinnickinnic  Rivers on  Lake  Michigan
water  quality  (PLUARG,  1979a).   The  study focused on  the  area  around  the
Milwaukee Harbor.   The  effect  of  the  Menomonee  River  on lake  water  quality
could  not be  isolated  from that  of  the  Milwaukee  and  Kinnickinnic  rivers.
However,  estimates  indicated  that 50  percent  of the  annual  river  loadings
reaching the harbor were contributed by the Menomonee.

         Water quality  surveys  were conducted  in  the  inner  and  outer  harbors
and  inshore  and  offshore  zones  during  periods of  high  and  low flow  in  the
rivers.   Surveys  indicated  that concentrations of nutrients,  suspended solids
and metals   decreased  with  increasing  distance   from  the confluence  of  the
rivers.   Wisconsin  researchers  found  that runoff  events  had   an immediate
effect on harbor  water  quality.   Water quality  of  the inshore zone was usually
not degraded during high flow events.

         Mechanisms  controlling the  transport  of pollutants  between  regions
were  studied.   It  was  determined that  net transport   of event  and  baseflow
water  to  the  inshore  zone  was primarily  dependent on harbor  current patterns,
and that  a  significant  portion  of the annual loadings  of pollutants  from the
Jones  Island sewage treatment plant  and  the rivers were retained   in the harbor
due  to deposition.    Percentages  of  the  total annual loadings  entering  the
inshore zone were estimated  as  45  percent for suspended solids, 61 percent for
total  phosphorus,  and  35 percent  for  soluble phosphorus.   About  70 percent of
the  suspended solids  discharged from  the Menomonee  River were retained
annually  in the inner harbor.

                                       20

-------
         A  two-part  draft report  on  studies utilizing  the LANDRUN model  was
made  available in  November,   1979  (PLUARG,  1979b) .    The model  was used  to
simulate  runoff  and  sediment  loadings  from 48  subwatersheds of  diverse  land
uses  and  physiographic  features  in  the  Menomonee  River  watershed.    Nine
subwatersheds, consisting  of  16  percent  of  the  total  area,  were  identified as
critical  source  areas.   Developing  lands  were  identified as  the  primary
contributors  (50-85  percent)  of sediments.  Thus, management of  these sources
can be  particularly  cost-effective.    This  confirms PLUARG1s conclusion
regarding  the  importance  of controlling erosion  from urban  construction sites.

         A Model  Enhanced Unit  Loading  method  (MEUL) utilizing  LANDRUN was
developed  to  simulate  pollutant  loadings from urban  and  non-urban land  uses.
 Simulated  loadings  were  evaluated as  if the  land  uses were  located  on  four
hydrologically  different  soils,  representative  of  standard hydrologic
 categories.    Pollutant loadings varied  by several orders  of magnitude  among
 land uses.

          Sensitivity analyses tested various  parameters  as to their effect  on
 loadings.     The  most   significant  facts   were  found  to  be  the  extent  of
 imperviousness of urban  areas,  fraction  of  impervious  areas  directly connected
 to  surface  runoff,  interception  and  depression  storage,  average duration  of
 the  dry  period before  a rain, curb  height  for  urban areas,  and  soil  type,
 slope  and vegetative  cover  for  pervious  urban and  non-urban  areas.   Again,
 this further  supports  the findings of PLUARG.

          The  applicability   of  the  unit  loading  data  obtained by the  MEUL
 method was  tested on a number  of  subwatersheds.   Simulated and  measured values
 for  sediment  and phosphate-P were  of  the  same  order  of  magnitude.   The MEUL
 model  provides  a  more  detailed  approach  for estimated nonpoint  pollutant loads
 than  the  "overview model"  approach  (Johnson  et al. , 1978)  used  in  PLUARG.
 However,  the  data  requirements  are  much  more  restrictive.    As  the  name
 implies,  overview  modeling  is  designed  to  address   a  large area  (i.e.,  the
 entire Great  Lakes  basin),  while  MEUL  is most appropriately applied to smaller
 areas.   Because of  the  urban focus  of  the Menomonee  study,  MEUL is likely  to
 be especially useful in  future  analyses  of urban  areas.
                                         21

-------
Maumee River Pilot Watershed Study

         The Mautnee  River  Basin  is  primarily  agricultural.    Studies by  the
U.S.  Army  Corps  of  Engineers  and  the  Great   Lakes  Basin  Commission  have
indicated that nonpoint sources account  for  about  75  percent  of the phosphorus
and nitrogen  entering  Lake Erie  from  this  watershed.  It was  thus  decided to
emphasize soil and  nutrient losses  from small agricultural watersheds in this
study  and  to  conduct  special  investigations  on sediment  transport.    The
project  focused  on the Ohio  portion  of  the Maumee  to  supplement  work  being
conducted in  the Black Creek,  Indiana, 108(a)  Demonstration Project.   Black
Creek is tributary to the Maumee.

         As reported  in  Skimin et al.  (1979),  a  summary  report of  the  major
findings from the Maumee  Pilot Watershed Study was published  in April of 1978.
A two-volume detailed report  describing the results  was published  in March of
last year (Logan and  Stiefel, 1979; Logan,  1979).  The  following is a summary
of the highlights of these  recent  reports.

Study Objectives.  The specific objectives  of the study were:

         1.   "To  determine  the  effects  of  land-use  practices  on the
             loss   of  sediment   and   associated   chemicals   from
             representative small  agricultural watersheds in the basin
             and  to  compare  these  data   with  downstream  reference
             samples.

         2.   To  study and determine  the  physical, chemical,  and
             mineralogical  properties  of major soils  in  the basin and
             relate these data to their susceptibility  to  erosion and
             fluvial transport.

         3.   To  determine  the  physical,  chemical, and  mineralogical
             properties of  suspended sediments and bottom sediments in
             order  to identify  fluvial transport  mechanisms  and  to
             evaluate equilibrium stabilities of minerals in suspended
             and bottom sediments.

                                        22

-------
         4.   To   determine   phosphate   sorption-desorption   and
             precipitation interactions with sediment  characteristics
             and concentration levels.

         5.   To  determine heavy  metals  leaving  small  agricultural
             watersheds   as   contrasted  to  downstream  reference
             sources."  (Logan,  1979)

Study Approach.  The  basic approach  of the  study  was  to measure sediment  and
nutrient losses from  small agricultural watersheds and  plots  on major  soils in
the Maumee River  basin  and  compare these  losses  with  those  from larger  areas
in  the  watershed.    The study   investigated  the  differences  in  pollutant
generation on  several of the major  soils  of the  Maumee basin and  determined
the  effects  of  seasonal  changes  and  soil  characteristics  on  sediment  and
nutrient  generation.  Pollutant transport  by tile  drainage  was  also  studied
because of the extensive use  of this  practice in the  basin.

         Five  small  sites  were  chosen in  Defiance  County to monitor  soil  and
nutrient  losses  under  the  prevailing crop  management  practices.   Each  site
chosen  was  dominated by  one  of the  four most  important  soil  series in  the
basin.    Surface  runoff  was  monitored  from May  1975  to  May  1977,  using  a
continuous flow monitoring system.   All  sites were  fall-plowed and  planted in
soybeans.   Any differences  in  sediment and  nutrient  losses were  therefore  a
function of differences in soil type.

Results.  Monitoring  results  obtained  during  1975  to 1977 indicated that  there
were  significant  differences in sediment  and nutrient  losses  among different
soil  types  in  the  Maumee basin.    Greatest sediment  losses occurred on  the
poorly  drained,  high clay, lake plain soils.   Lowest  losses were  reported on
soils with good internal drainage characteristics which were  tile drained.

         Total phosphorus  content   of   soils  was  determined  to  be high
(approximately 700 ug P/g sediment) as a  result  of their high clay  content  and
phosphorus enrichment in  the  clay  fraction of mineral  soils.   Soils and bottom
sediments demonstrated  a  large  capacity to  adsorb phosphorus,  while suspended
sediments  were  high in  phosphorus  that  could  be  desorbed  into  solution.

                                       23

-------
Stream  sediments,  therefore,  had  the  capacity to  reduce  high  point  source
contributions  of  soluble   phosphorus   and  were  capable  of  releasing  large
amounts of phosphorus to aquatic vegetation.

         Heavy metals  were  measured  in  soils,  sediments,  and waters.   Levels
of trace  metals  in  the Maumee River were  low  and  reflected background levels
in  the  soil  and  normal   metal   contributions  from  groundwater.    Although
scattered  point  sources  of  heavy metals contributed  little  to the total load,
their  effect  on  near-downstream water  quality could  be  severe.    A pesticide
scan of agricultural  soils  and stream-bottom  sediments revealed  only traces of
persistent chlorinated hydrocarbons  such as DDT and dieldrin.

Recommendations.    The  authors  of   the  study made  several  recommendations
concerning  the Maumee  basin  in  particular and  the  Great  Lakes  system  as  a
whole:

          1.   Point  source  phosphorus   reductions  must  be   continued,
              with emphasis  on  lakeshore  dischargers (e.g., Toledo)  and
              those  located   on main  stem  tributaries.   Point source
              phosphorus  reductions  are  vital  in  the Toledo  area  if
              nearshore  water  quality  problems  are to be  improved  in
              Lake Erie.

          2.   Fertilizer  and manure  management  should more  accurately
              reflect crop  requirements and  soil-test  levels.    Soil
              test  results should  be  used to monitor available  nutrient
              levels  in regions of intensive cultivation.  Educational
              programs should  stress the importance  of  following  soil
              test  recommendations,  as plant-available  phosphorus
              levels  in  the Maumee  soils   are  generally adequate  for
              maximum crop  production.   Fertilizer mismanagement  only
              results in the enrichment of suspended  sediment.
                                        24

-------
        3.  Programs to  reduce  soil  loss  resulting  from  intensive
            agriculture activity should  be accelerated,  with emphasis
            on  medium-  and   fine-textured  soils  on  sloping  land.
            Depending  on  the particular  soil/slope  combination,
            various agricultural conservation  practices  are  advocated
            to  reduce  transport of the  generally  fine-grained  Maumee
            soils.   These  include  no-till plowing,  grassed  waterways
            and buffer   strips,  subsurface  tile  drainage,   and
            establishment of residue cover.

        4.  Cropland erosion  control  should be geared  to  the months
            of  January through April  when snowmelt  and  runoff result
            in   maximum   erosion   and   transport  of   sediment.
            Conservation  practices  which maximize residue  cover
            during  this  period are likely  to  be  more  effective than
            measures to  reduce  sediment transport.

         5.  A  tributary monitoring  program  should  be  developed  to
             periodically  scan water and sediment  for toxic  chemicals.
LAKE ERIE WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT  STUDY

         The results of Phases I and II of the Lake Erie Wastewater Management
Study  (LEWMS)  were  discussed  in "Post-PLUARG Evaluation of  Great  Lakes Water
Quality Management  Studies"  (Skimin et al.,  1979).   Phase III  of LEWMS will
run through October, 1981, when the final report,  presenting a management plan
for the U.S. portion of  the Lake Erie  watershed,  will  be published.   In Phase
III,  methods   are  being developed  to   implement  management  practices  and   to
measure progress in reducing pollutant  loading  to the  lake.

Honey Creek Watershed Management Project

         The  Honey Creek  Watershed Management  Project is  one of  the major
programs  of Phase  III  of  LEWMS.    The end  result will  be  a  work  plan  for
management  of  the  entire watershed  with emphasis  on problem  identification  and
development of  site specific management practices.
                                       25

-------
         As  one  of  the  components  of  the   study,  mulch-till   and  no-till
demonstration plots were  established on several  farms  representing a range of
soils  and  management  systems.    Crop productivity,  time savings,  costs, and
effect on  water  quality are all  being documented.   In  October of  1979, a two-
day  seminar/tour  was  held in  Bucyrus,  Ohio,  in  the  Honey  Creek watershed.
Initial results were  presented  from  several of  the demonstration  farms in the
area.  A  summary  of the major  findings  is included  in  Appendix  A, "Lake Erie
Wastewater  Management  Study:     Honey  Creek   Watershed Management  Project."
Generally,  time  and  money-saving   benefits  were  realized   by  those  farmers
utilizing  the no-till  practice.   Improvements  in water  quality attributable to
implementation of no-till  farming are still being monitored.

         Information  from productivity  tests  has  become available  since the
seminar/tour was conducted.  The  results appear very promising.  The 1979 corn
harvest ranged  from 90  to  185 bushels per acre, with an  average of 135 for no-
till.  Yields from conventional  farming  normally range  from 104 to  107 bushels
per acre.   The  soybean harvest ranged from  25  to 49 bushels per acre, with an
average of 40 bushels  per  acre  reported  for  no-till.  Normal yields ordinarily
range from 33 to 35 bushels per acre  (Crumrine and  Wurm,  1980).

Five Additional Basin Studies

         Because there  are many  critical land  forms, land uses, and soil  types
not  found  in the Honey Creek  watershed,  five  additional watersheds have been
selected to  provide complete  representation  of conditions existing  in  the Lake
Erie basin.  The five watersheds  are:

                   Bean Creek - Michigan
                   South Branch of the Cattaraugus  - New York
                   West Branch of the Rocky River - Ohio
                   Sandusky River Basin  -  Ohio
                   Ottawa  River - Ohio
                                       26

-------
         Baseline  water  quality  and  quantity  data  are  currently  being
collected.   This  data  will  be  utilized  to  calibrate and  verify  a diffuse
source model for each  watershed.   The  Land Resource  Information System (LRIS),
developed  for  the  Lake  Erie  drainage  basin,  is   presently  being used  to
formulate a data base  for  each  watershed.   Present basin conditions,  potential
gross  erosion  sources,   and  opportunities  for  implementing  best  management
practices (BMPs) will be summarized in map and tabular form using LRIS.

         In the  future,  model management  programs will be developed for each
basin.  Final  reports  will detail opportunities  for  improving water  quality by
altering  farm management  practices  and applying  soil  conservation  practices.
Information will  be  sufficient  for land  managers to  begin  implementation of
select BMPs, perhaps under  the auspices of the Rural Clean Water Program.

SECTION 108(a) DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS

         Section  108(a)  of the 1972 Amendments  to the  Federal Water  Pollution
Control  Act  (P.L.  97-500)  authorizes  the administrator of EPA "to  enter  into
agreements... to carry  out one or more  projects  to demonstrate new methods  and
techniques  and to  develop  preliminary  plans  for the elimination or  control of
pollution, within  all  or any part of  the watersheds of  the  Great Lakes."   The
first  Post-PLUARG report   (Skimin  et  al.,  1979)  discussed the major  findings
and  recommendations  contained  in  the final  reports  of  three of  the  108(a)
demonstration  projects  which  have studied  nonpoint  source  pollution problems
and  solutions:    Black  Creek,  Western Lake  Superior   Red   Clay  Erosion,  and
Rochester,  New York.   Since then, the  final technical report of  the  Washington
County  Project has become  available (Madison  et al., 1980).   A summary  of  its
major  findings, conclusions and recommendations  is presented  in Appendix  B.

CUYAHOGA RIVER RESTORATION STUDY

          The   Cuyahoga  River  Restoration  Study  was  initiated  by  the  Flood
Control  Act of  1968  (Section 219) which  authorized  a  survey of the  river  "in
the  interest   of  flood control,  pollution  abatement,  low-flow  regulation,  and
other  allied  water  purposes."   The  scope  of  the  study  was broadened  under
Section 108  of the  1970  Flood  Control Act where  "water quality,  environmental
quality,  recreation,  fish  and  wildlife"  values  were recognized in  addition to
 flood  control.
                                        27

-------
         The First Interim Report  was completed  in  September  of  1971  (U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers, 1971).  It identified a long-range plan of action and
presented  an early-action  program  to  be   implemented  in  1973.    The  plan
recommended recreational and aesthetic improvements, debris removal, and flood
control along the river.

         The Second Interim  Report  was published  in  December,  1975.   It
identified  significant  flooding  problems and  developed corrective  plans  for
these areas.

         A Revised Plan of Study was  issued  in July,  1977  (U.S.  Army Corps of
Engineers,  1977).    Study  plans  for alleviating  erosion  and  sedimentation
problems,  flood  control,   and   debris   removal  were  included.     A  detailed
investigation of  the  erosion and  sediment  problem  will be made  in the Third
Interim Report.

         A  number  of work  efforts have  already been  undertaken.    The U.S.
Geological Survey (USGS) completed a  sediment sampling program in the Cuyahoga
basin  in  FY '78 between Old  Portage  and Independence.   The program verified
results of  a previous  study which  indicated that areas within this reach were
contributing inordinate amounts of sediment.  They  determined the total  annual
sediment yield  to be expected  from  this reach.

         The  U.S.  Soil   Conservation   Service   (SCS),   under  a  two-year
Interagency  Agreement  with  the  U.S.  Army   Corps  of  Engineers,  has recently
completed  their  portion of the  investigation.   Their work effort  included  a
study of  streambank and upland erosion on the  river and  two of its  tributaries
(Brandywine Creek and Tinkers Creek).  SCS  has  also analyzed the results of  a
stream  cross-section  survey  (designed  to  determine  the  relative  amounts of
sheet  and channel  erosion),  and  the results of  the USGS sediment  sampling
program.

          Study  results indicate  that  streambank erosion is  a much less
significant  source  of  sediment  than  previously  thought.    It is now  estimated
that streambank  erosion contributes 52,000  cubic yards of  sediment  per  year  to
the  river  (approximately 78,000  tons  annually).  Of this,  roughly  47,000 cubic

                                       28

-------
yards actually  reaches the  river mouth  at the  Cleveland  Harbor.   Dredging
performed by the Corps of Engineers and private interests removes 860,000 tons
of  sediment  per year  from the  harbor.    Thus,  it is  estimated that  only  5
percent   of  this  dredged  material  is  attributable   to streambank  erosion.
Future studies have  been proposed which will  attempt to verify this figure.

         The  upland   erosion  study  conducted  by  the SCS  divided  the  reach
between  Old  Portage  and  Independence  into   seven  subwatersheds  for
investigation.  Results were obtained  from only five  of  these subwatersheds  at
the  conclusion of this  portion of  the  study.   Initial results indicate  that  as
much  as 41 percent  of  the harbor sediment  is  contributed  by upland erosion.
Corps personnel feel  that an additional 20 to 40 percent  of  the  sediment may  be
derived  from point  sources  such as municipal  treatment facilities  and  steel
mills  in  the area  (Aguglia,  1980).   This  hypothesis  will be addressed  in
future  work  efforts.

          The  final  product  of  the Cuyahoga Restoration Study will  identify the
prime  sources of  sediment in this reach  of  the  river (between  Old Portage and
Independence)  and  recommend  areas  where  erosion  control   efforts  should  be
instigated.   Alternative  methods for control will  be  analyzed and  the relative
benefits  versus   cost  determined.    This  is  consistent  with  PLUARG's
 recommendation  that   sedimentation  of  watercourses   be controlled  by  first
 identifying the problem areas, then  implementing cost-effective  control
measures on a priority basis.

 THE WISCONSIN NONPOINT SOURCE WATER POLLUTION ABATEMENT PROGRAM (WISCONSIN
FUND)

          The Wisconsin Nonpoint  Source  Water Pollution  Abatement Program  was
 established by the Wisconsin  legislature  in 1978.   The purpose of the program
 is  to  provide  the  administrative framework and  technical  and  financial
 assistance  necessary  for  implementing  measures  designed   to  meet  the needs
 identified in water quality management plans.
                                        29

-------
         Cost-sharing monies are available  to  municipalities,  land owners  and
land operators  for  installing  best management  practices.   Grants are made  on
the basis of  expected  water quality benefits  and  financial  need.  Funding  is
concentrated on selected "priority watersheds"  where  nonpoint  source  pollution
is  a  critical  problem.  Watersheds  are selected  through  a three-step  review
process involving planning  and pollution control  personnel, elected  officials
and members  of  the  public.  Only  those portions  of  the watersheds  impacting
water quality are eligible  for  funds.

         The  Wisconsin Nonpoint Source  Water  Pollution  Abatement Program  is
probably  the first  example of implementation of nonpoint  control  measures
consistent with the PLUARG  recommendations.   Such  an  implementation  initiative
is  related  to  the  direct   participation  of  State of Wisconsin  staff  in  the
PLUARG study.  The effectiveness of this program should  be  watched closely,  as
it will likely serve as a prototype for programs in other states.

Lower Manitowoc River Watershed Study

         The  Lower  Manitowoc River watershed  is  one  of  the  first  five
"priority watersheds"  selected  for  inclusion in the 1979  program.  A watershed
management  plan and  implementation  program  were   published  in  October,  1979
(WDNR,  1979) .   The  objective of the  program is  to  reduce  the   amount  of
phosphorus entering the nearshore  waters of Lake Michigan  by 50 percent.  This
is  consistent  with  PLUARG1s recommendation  that  control   programs  be
implemented  to  reduce  phosphorus loadings  to Lake  Michigan and that additional
reductions  of  phosphorus   be   implemented  "to  reduce  local   nearshore water
quality problems and to prevent future degradation."

         Manure carried in  runoff  from barnyards or frozen or saturated fields
was  identified  as  the  most serious nonpoint  source of phosphorus.  Additional
sources  of concern  included:   erosion  from  streambanks and  agricultural  and
construction  activities;  septic system malfunctions;  and  urban  runoff.  Best
management  practices  were  identified  to  control pollution  from significant
sources.   Projects  included  installation  of  barnyard runoff  control  systems
and  storage  systems  for  manure,   as well as  initiation  of  reduced  tillage
practices,  strip-cropping  and  installation  of  terraces on cropland.

                                        30

-------
         The  Lower  Manitowoc  River  Watershed  study will  provide  a  good
demonstration project to supplement the  108(a)  projects sponsored by U.S. EPA.
The focus on  manure runoff  is  important,  since this  is  a key  problem  in the
Wisconsin portion  of the Great  Lakes  basin where dairy  farms  abound.   Manure
runoff is also  a problem in  parts  of  the  Canadian  basin as well  as  in other
parts of the U.S. basin.

         Anywhere  from  one to  five  watersheds will be selected for inclusion
in  the  program  in  1980, depending  on the  1980-1981  state  legislative budget
appropriations  for  the  program.   The Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
has completed  the  first phase of  selection,  identifying  the top 20 percent of
the  state's 330 watersheds  with  potential water  quality  problems  caused by
nonpoint  sources.    Twenty-four  of the  63 eligible   priority  watersheds are
within the  Lake  Michigan drainage  basin.

AGRICULTURAL CONSERVATION PROGRAM  (AGP)

         The  Agricultural  Conservation Program is the  oldest and  largest  cost-
sharing  program for the voluntary implementation of conservation  practices on
farms.   The  ACP is administered  by  the  USDA Agricultural  Stabilization  and
Conservation  Service (ASCS)  in  each county of a  state.   Local control  of ACP
funds is  assured through a county committee composed  of  agency representatives
and three  farmers.   The  committee has complete  responsibility  for  selecting
the practices  to be cost-shared, the  rates  of  cost-sharing,  and the proportion
of the  county's  ACP   program  to  be   spent on  each  practice.   Farmers  and
ranchers  who  receive ACP  funds are responsible  for sharing a portion  of  the
costs,  for completing  the  practice according to specifications,  for  complying
with   state  laws   and   other  regulatory  measures,  and  for  maintaining  the
 practice.

Conservation Practices

          Environmentally approved  practices  for  each  locality  are recommended
by state and county ACP development groups.   These practices are in accordance
with PLUARG's  recommendations  for  control programs to reduce  sediment  loading
 to the Great Lakes system.  Several categories are listed below:

                                        31

-------
         • Prevention of Soil  Loss
           - establishment of  long-term  grasses and  legumes through  seeding,
             fertilizer, and  liming materials
           - construction  of  terraces  and   use  of  strip or  contour  farming
             operations
           - construction of  water runoff diversions
           - restoration and  establishment of wind  breaks
           - encouragement of minimum tillage practices  and  residue  management
             systems

         • Improvement of Water Quality
           - installation  of  sediment retention and  water  control  structures
             such as  erosion  control  dams and desilting  reservoirs  to dispose
             of excess water
           - establishment of vegetative cover to buffer streambanks
           - construction  of   sod  waterways  to  prevent  erosion  from  excess
             water runoff
           - installation of  animal waste control facilities  below feedlots

         • Conservation of Soil and Water Through Forestry
           - planting  of  trees and  shrubs  for  forestry  purposes and erosion
             control
           - improvement of established stands

         • Water Conservation
           - construction of  reservoirs  and  ponds  for  erosion  control,
             livestock water,  and irrigation
           - leveling of land
           - installation  of  structures  to  conserve  water, prevent  erosion,
             and permit more  efficient use of irrigation water (ASCS,  1979).

         Any county farmer may apply  for  cost-sharing  funds  under  the ACP.  As
of 1979, an  individual  could  receive  a maximum of  $3,500 in a given year.  The
government's share of  the  cost  ranges from  30 to 80 percent, depending  on the
fanner's financial status.  Farmers may  also request  funding as a group, which
is useful for installing practices that involve adjoining parcels of land.

                                       32

-------
Small Farmer Projects^

         PLUARG  recommends  that  water  quality  plans  be  developed  for  each
farm, and  that  the  plan be "commensurate with the  fanner's ability to  sustain
an  economically  viable operation."   Although the  cost-sharing  provisions  of
the  ACP  are generous, many small  farmers are still  financially  excluded  from
the  program's  benefits.    This  concern  is  addressed   by the  Small  Farmer
Projects,  funded by  reserve  funds from the  ACP.  The incentive for low income
farmers  to participate  is  the 90  percent  cost  share  which   is  paid  by  the
government  under this program.

         A  Small  Fanner Project  is  underway in  the  Great  Lakes  basin  in  the
upper peninsula  of  Michigan  — one of  ten  pilot  projects nationwide.  Farmers
in  Baraga  and Houghton Counties face severe  soil  erosion  problems  due  to  the
extremely  high acidity  of  the  soil  which  deters  the establishment of long-term
vegetative  cover.   A  three-year  allocation of $265,000  is being  spent  on 49
farms.   Problems  being addressed include:   correction  of high soil acidity by
the  application of  liming materials  (an average  of 4.5  tons/acre versus  a
statewide  average  of  1  ton/acre);  erosion  control  through planting  of  long-
lived legume cover  and  development  of  a  forest management  plan  (where
applicable);  and better water control through  improved drainage and ponds.

Special Projects

         Special  projects  are  designated  by  the ACP to  solve community-wide
agricultural  water  pollution problems.   One of  the  largest of these projects
is   located  in the  Saginaw  Bay  basin.   This  area is  highly  desirable  for
implementation  of  an  agricultural  conservation  pilot  project  due  to  the
intensity  of  agricultural  land use in  the  area,  its relationship to sensitive
portions  of Saginaw Bay,  and  because of the  generally  degraded  nature of the
inner bay.

         Saginaw  Bay  is  highly enriched  due to  excessive  nutrient loadings
which  result  in  significant  algal  growth.   Siltation  and  sedimentation  are
creating  a problem  in the nearshore  zone  and  in   the  tributaries.   This is
evidenced   by  the  proliferation  of  rough  fish  species  such  as  carp  and
bullhead.   Waterfowl  habitat  has  also  been degraded  due  to  excessive
sedimentation  (ECMPDR,  1980) .
                                        33

-------
         The ASCS has designated $400,000  for  the  first year of  this  project,
less $20,000 which will  be  transferred  to the Soil  Conservation  Service  (SCS)
for  technical  assistance  to  farm  owners and  operators  in  the area.    The
remaining $380,000 will  provide cost-share incentives to farmers  for utilizing
best  management  practices to  reduce  sediment  and  nutrient  runoff  from
hydrologically active  areas.    It  is anticipated  that project  funding will
continue for a total  of five years.

         This AGP project  is designed to provide cost-sharing funds for  areas
with severe wind  or  water  erosion problems.   Soil loss based on  the Universal
Soil Loss  Equation  (USLE)  is  estimated   to  average  2  tons/acre/year  for  the
flat lakeshore plains.   Winds are  thought to play  a  significant role in  the
delivery of  nutrient   enriched sediments  to  the  drainage  network  and,
ultimately,  to Saginaw Bay.   In  the water erosion areas,  the  predominant soil
erosion problem is attributable to overland runoff over base  soils  on  moderate
slopes.   Prior to this  project,  this area  lacked the necessary conservation
tillage  practices and   cover  cropping   as  well  as  control  structures   for
effectively reducing  water-related erosion of  these soils.

         Three work programs will  address the  following  project  objectives:

         1.   To  demonstrate the  cost-effectiveness  of conservation
             tillage  practices  on the clay loam soils of the area; and
             to encourage  more widespread,  voluntary  utilization  of
             conservation  tillage without the  availability of  cost-
             share incentives.

         2.   To demonstrate that an  agricultural  nonpoint source
             pollution control  strategy  can measurably   improve the
             aquatic  community  of the streams  within  the project  area,
             and   within  the nearshore zone  of Saginaw Bay (directly
             impacted by the project area).
                                       34

-------
3.   To demonstrate  that  the  reduction of  loadings  from
    agricultural  lands under  best  management  practices
    (especially  conservation   tillage)   will  result  in
    measurable  improvement  of  the water  quality  of  Saginaw
    Bay;  and  to project the long  term  impacts  on the water
    quality of Saginaw Bay based  upon  the implementation  of  a
    state  agricultural  nonpoint  source  control strategy  for
    critical areas.

Work elements include:

1.  Cost-Effectiveness of Conservation  versus  Conventional
    Tillage

         An effective means of reducing  sediment  loss  due to
    wind  and  water  transport is  through the use  of  tillage
    systems  which retain  surface  cover  and  promote  surface
    roughness.   In this manner,  wind and water energy capable
    of eroding  the  soil  is buffered,  and a reduction in soil
    loss  as well  as associated  nutrients  occurs.   Although
    conservation tillage  is  now  being  utilized  within  the
    project  area, it  appears  that farmers  will  discontinue
    this  practice  once  federal cost-share funds run out.

          In  the hopes of  encouraging  implaaentation  of this
    practice  without   cost-share  incentives,  the  economic
    viability of widespread conservation  tillage systems in
    the  Saginaw  Bay area  will  be  determined.    Model farms
    will  be characterized and  an economic model developed to
    study the costs  of  the farms.  Conventional, minimum, and
    no-till   practices  will  be   analyzed   in  terms  of  crop
    production  on the model farms.   A  computer program will
    be  developed, in conjunction with the economic model, to
    consider  various inflation and  interest  rates,  as well as
    changing  commodity prices,  in  order  to model  future
    trends.
                               35

-------
 2.  Aquatic Community Monitoring

         Baseline data of  the  aquatic  community  was  gathered
    during  the  Fall  of  1979.    efforts  to  implement
    agricultural  best  management  practices  are  currently
    being  intensified  in  hydrologically  active  areas  (within
    1/2 mile of  each  bank  of  the stream or drain).   This  is
    consistent    with    PLUARG    management    strategy
    recommendations for this area, which was  identified as  a
    major  contributor of  agricultural  nonpoint  loads to
    Saginaw Bay.

         Resampling of identical  stations  will  begin in the
    Spring of 1982.  Data will be analyzed and compared with
    the baseline data  collected in  1979.  Biological sampling
    will include: periphyton, benthic organisms, macrophytes,
    and fish from tributaries  and drains; and phytoplankton,
    zooplankton,   benthic  organisms, macrophytes, and  fish
    from Saginaw Bay.   This  project  will  demonstrate  that
    best management practices  implemented  in critical areas
    can have a  beneficial  impact  on  the aquatic community.

3.  Water  Quality Monitoring

        PLUARG  has determined  that  the  most cost-effective
    approach  for  treating  agricultural  nonpoint  source
    contributions is to implement best  management practices
    in hydrologically   active areas.    The  objective  of  the
    final  work  element  is  to demonstrate  that implementation
    of  best  management practices,  especially  conservation
    tillage,  in  priority  agricultural areas  subject  to  wind
    and  water  erosion  will  result  in measurable improvement
    of the  water  quality of  Saginaw Bay.
                             36

-------
     Two  demonstration  plots  will  be   located   in  the
Wiscoggin Creek watershed on soils representative of the
project area.   These  plots will be  used  to analyze the
cost-effectiveness  of  conservation  tillage  versus
conventional tillage,  and  to  monitor drain runoff, wind
transport,  and  incremental  loadings  of sediment and
nutrients.    Wiscoggin  Creek  will  be  monitored  for
suspended  sediments,   total   phosphorus,   dissolved
phosphorus,  ortho phosphorus, nitrate, nitrite,  kjeldahl
nitrogen, and ammonia.

     Six  sample  sites  will be  established to  determine
the  current  loadings  to  Saginaw  Bay.    These  will  be
compared  with  the  loads  developed  by  the  Sea  Grant
program from  1973 to 1975.  Parameters to  be  sampled are
the  same  as  for  Wiscoggin Creek,  with  the addition of
dissolved oxygen.  The  loadings  will  be  incorporated into
the Saginaw Bay nutrient model which  will  be adjusted  for
the  zone  of the bay adjacent to the project  area.  The
model will determine the water quality impacts associated
with   existing   agricultural   loadings   and  impacts
associated  with  the reduced loads  based  upon information
from the  treated area.

     The  East  Central  Michigan  Planning  and  Development
Region has developed a strategy  to address their nonpoint
source  problem  which  mirrors  PLUARG's  recommendations
concerning  treatment  of  high  priority  areas with best
management  practices.    The  regional  staff hopes  to
demonstrate  to  the  agricultural producer,  the state,  and
local  units  of government  that  the water   quality  of
Saginaw Bay  can be significantly improved by implementing
best management practices  in hydrologically active areas.
Producers will be informed of the savings associated with
minimizing  soil  erosion  and   will be   encouraged  to
implement conservation  tillage practices  based on  the

                           37

-------
             results  of  this   project.    Government  units  will   be
             requested  to  develop  tax  incentives  and  to  enact
             legislation to further assist individuals  in implementing
             these practices.

The Long Term Agreement Program

         The  Food and  Agriculture  Act   of  1977  directs   the  ASCS  to  place
greater  emphasis  on  long-term  conservation problems.    Farmers interested  in
improving  their  entire farm over  several years  may participate  in  the Long
Term  Agreement   Program,  in  which  they  agree  to  follow  a comprehensive
conservation plan  in  return for a guaranteed commitment of ACP funds and SCS
technical  assistance.    The law  requires county  committees  to  provide more
funding for enduring conservation and environmental practices,  rather than for
production-oriented  practices.    Many  county  committees  have  responded  by
devoting  more   cost-sharing dollars  to  practices  that  will  enhance   water
quality.

         The Agricultural  Conservation Program,  in conjunction with technical
assistance from  the  Soil  Conservation  Service,  the Forest Service, and
agricultural extension  services,  is an  effective  means of implementing many
PLUARG recommendations at  the local level, especially in the areas  of sediment
control from agricultural  land  use.

RURAL CLEAN WATER  PROGRAM

         Section  208(j)  of the  Federal Water  Pollution Control  Act,  as
amended, authorizes the Secretary of Agriculture,  with  the concurrence  of the
EPA Administrator, to  establish  and administer  a program to enter into 5  to  10
year  contracts  with  owners  or  operators  of rural lands "for  the  purpose of
installing and maintaining measures incorporating best  management practices  to
control nonpoint  source  pollution."  An  additional requirement  is that BMPs
must be contained  in  certified  and  approved  Water Quality Management Plans.
                                       38

-------
         The Agricultural  Stabilization  and  Conservation  Service  (ASCS)  has
responsibility  for   administering  the  Rural  Clean  Water  Program  which  has
received initial  funding  from  Congress  for FY 80  on a special  one-year basis
as part  of  the  USDA budget separate  from 208(j).   At the  time  of  this review
(February,  1980), final  regulations  had not been  published,  but were expected
to be available in the near future.

The Saline Valley Project

         The  Mill  Creek  (tributary to   the  Huron  River)  and Saline River
 (tributary  to  the  River  Raisin)   watersheds  in  southeastern  Michigan  have
 recently been  designated  as project  areas under the  Rural  Clean Water  Program.
 The  Saline Valley  Project is  one  of  13  pilot  conservation projects  selected
 nationwide, and has received  initial  funding  of roughly $2.5  million.  It  is
 expected to run over the  next  five to six years.

          The  Mill  Creek  and  Saline  River  watersheds  are  predominately
 agricultural  in land  use.    They   are   tributary  to  heavily-used,  polluted
 waters.   Both  the  Huron  River and  River Raisin  are  public  drinking  water
 sources  and  are extensively  used  for partial and  total body contact.   The
 project  area  was identified  as  southeast Michigan's most  concentrated source
 of rural  nonpoint  pollution in the  Southeast Michigan  Council of  Government's
 "208 Water Quality Management  Plan."   A number  of  problems  currently exist,
 including  areas  subject  to inordinate amounts of  sedimentation, an area  prone
 to  extreme  wind erosion,  cases  of  road  and  streambank  erosion,  and  many
 problems  with  animal waste management.   The  area also  has  a  variety of  soil,
 slope  and  drainage  characteristics.

           The  objectives  of the project are  as  follows:

           1.   To  improve water  use  in  Mill  Creek and the  Saline River
               for recreational and  drinking   purposes   and  to  reduce
               sediment  collection in impoundments.

           2.   To meet state water quality standards  and  areawide water
               quality goals in the project area.

                                         39

-------
          3.   To  reduce nonpoint source contributions to Lake Erie from
              the  project  area  to  levels  consistent  with  goals  set
              forth by the  International Joint Commission.

          4.   To meet  Soil  Conservation District  goals  for application
              of  best management  practices  to  the  extent  that  they
              contribute  to improve water quality in the project area.

          5.   To  achieve  a functional,  cooperative  and continuing
              institutional program  for solving  water  quality  problems
              in the project area.

          6.   To  acquaint  local  and  state  level  funding bodies  of  the
              potential  of  local   agencies   to  fulfill  the  nonpoint
              source  control   requirements  as set   forth  in  approved
              water quality plans.

          A  number  of  pollution  abatement  practices  have  been  selected  for
implementation under this  program.  All of the  BMPs were  previously identified
in  the  208 planning  process  as  components  of  a  comprehensive water quality
management  plan.    Practices  include  strip  cropping,  minimum  tillage,
construction  of debris basins, and livestock  exclusion,  among  other things.

          Consistent with  PLUARG's recommendations, the  Saline Valley Project
will  reduce   the amount  of nutrients  (especially   phosphorus),  sediment,  and
fecal coliform entering  Lake  Erie.   Reduced  levels of pesticide contamination
are  also  expected.   The  project  is  a  good  example of  the  type  of  nonpoint
program  recommended  by  PLUARG  to  achieve  individual  lake  target phosphorus
loads.   Final results  are expected  to  exceed  Lake  Erie  phosphorus loading
reductions  substantially,  assuming  total  compliance  by  landowners.    Water
quality  in-stream,  as  well   as  nearshore  Lake  Erie,  will  be  improved  for
drinking water  supplies, total  body  contact, and recreational activity.
Although  no  attempt  was  made to  quantify  cost-effectiveness,  it  is certain
that  the  objectives  are manageable  and  will  have benefits  to  a  large
population of users.
                                      40

-------
NATIONWIDE URBAN RUNOFF PROGRAM

         EPA  is  continuing  its  efforts  to  control  nonpoint  source  pollution
under  the  Nationwide Urban  Runoff  Program.   As  discussed in  the  first Post-
PLUARG report, the program lists the following objectives (EPA, 1978):

       1.  To  ascertain  "what  is   known  about  urban  runoff
           mechanisms,  problems  and  controls"  and  present "a
           holistic  view of  the current  state  of  the art  and  a
           strategy  for  action."

       2.  To  present  findings  to  Congress on the  nature, crisis
           and  severity  of urban runoff problems and opportunities
           for control (i.e., descriptions  of  control measures  will
           be  included).

       In  FY  79-80, EPA  will  be   funding 30  urban  storm  runoff  prototype
projects  nationwide with  208  grants.   The  projects  will test  various best
management  practices  (e.g.,  street   sweeping,  detention  basin   storage)   and
determine  the  resultant  impact  on water quality.   Projects will generally last
three  years,  with  funding  on a  year-to-year basis.

       By  the end of FY 82,  EPA hopes to have developed a number of effective
control  measures.   The  program  will  culminate  with  a report to  Congress  in
1983  on  effects,  causes  and controls, and  will  continue thereafter to  assure
implementation.

THE SOIL AND  WATER RESOURCES CONSERVATION ACT
          The  Soil  and Water Resources Conservation Act  (RCA) of  1977  (P.L.  95-
 192)  was  passed  by  Congress  "(t)o  provide  for  furthering  the  conservation,
 protection,  and enhancement of the Nation's soil, water,  and related  resources
 for  sustained  use."    The Act   requires  USDA  conservation  programs  to  be
 responsive to the long-term needs  of the nation.  An appraisal  of  and program
 plan  for soil  and  water conservation were required to be  developed  by December
 31,  1979.   The  appraisal  and  program  plan  are  to be  updated at  five-year
 intervals.
                                        41

-------
         A draft Appraisal  and Program  Report  have  recently  been  made
available  for  public review  and comment  (USDA,  1980).   The  draft Appraisal
discusses the status, conditions, and  trends  of  the nation's soil,  water, and
related resources and presents a demand analysis for the resources.  Data were
analyzed relating to resource  supplies  and demands  in  terms of soil resource
quantity and quality, water quality conservation and supply, fish and wildlife
habitat,  upstream  flood  damages,  energy  conservation  and  production,  and
related natural resources.  Of particular  interest  are  the analyses concerning
soil  resources,  water  quality,  and  fish   and  wildlife  habitat  (specifically,
wetlands) .

         Objectives proposed for nondegradation  of  soil  resources,  based
largely  upon  factors contained  in the  Universal Soil  Loss  Equation,  include
the following:
         1.   On agricultural  lands  where  erosion is  currently  less
             than  the  T value,  mail
             does  not exceed T value.
than the  T value,  maintain  conditions  so that erosion
             On lands  presently  eroding  at rates greater  than  the T
             value and  less  than 14 T/A/Y  (tons  per  acre per year),
             utilize  the most  cost-effective  approach to  reduce
             erosion to a level approaching the T value.

             Where erosion exceeds  14 T/A/Y,  reduce  it  to  T value.

         2.   Minimize conversion of  prime  farmlands  to  other uses.
1-  T value:   Soil  loss tolerance is defined as the maximum rate of annual  soil
   erosion  that  will   permit  a  high  level  of  cropland  and  rangeland
   productivity to be  obtained  economically and indefinitely.   For cropland,
   forest land, pastureland,  and native  pasture,  the estimated  average  is 5
   tons per  acre per  year.   For rangeland, the estimated average is 2 tons  per
   acre per  year.
                                       42

-------
         Proposed  activities  to  accomplish  the  objectives  include  the
following:

         1.   Utilize data  on soil  and water  resources  to  identify
             priorities  to  be addressed by  conservation  programs .

         2.   Provide land  owners  with information  and  assistance  to
             evaluate and implement conservation needs.

         3.  Install conservation  practices on  141  million  acres of
             cropland nationwide  losing in  excess  of  5  tons  of  soil
             per  acre per  year.

          The  aforementioned objectives  and  activities  are  particularly
 relevant to the following  PLUARG recommendations:
          "...that erosion  and  sediment control  programs  be  imP^
          and expanded to reduce  the movement of  fine-grained  sediment
          from land surfaces...;
             (retain) for agricultural purposes .. .those farmlands which
          have the least natural limitations for this use;
           ...(develop) regional  priorities  for  implementing management
           plans . . . ;
            ..(strengthen  and  expand)  existing  technical assistance .and
           extension   programs  dealing  with  the   protection of  water
           quality,  including  rural .. .land management practices.

           Objectives proposed  for water resources  from the RCA draft Appraisal
  and Program Report  include the following:

           1.  Approach  zero  discharge  of  toxic  pollutants  at the
               earliest date possible.

           2.  Minimize loadings  of  organic waste  (e.g.,  animal  manure,
               urban sewage and sludge   applied  as fertilizer)  by
                focusing efforts on critical areas to:
                                         43

-------
               (a)  reduce  loadings of animal waste 60 percent and  total
                   organic  waste  loadings  by 40  percent  from the  1977
                   level;
               (b)  emphasize  reductions  in critical  areas  above  lakes
                   and reservoirs.

          3.   Reduce  nutrient  and  dissolved  solids  loadings  from
               agricultural sources  nationally by  30  percent.

          4.   Where sediment prevention is  critical  to the protection
               of  surface  waters,   reduce sediment  by  the   amount
              necessary to achieve  the  designated uses  as determined by
              the states.

          Activities  proposed  to   accomplish  the  objectives   include  the
 following:
          1.  Research  to  develop  and transfer  cost-effective  nonpoint
              pollution  control technology.
          2.  Elimination  of excessive  applications  of nutrients  and
              pesticides,  use of alternative chemicals,  etc.
          3.  Runoff  and   control  measures  to control  pollutants
              typically  attached to soil.
          4.  Animal waste  control  measures.
          5.   Irrigation  water  management;  tailwater  recovery;  water
              conservation.

          These  activities  and   objectives   are   consistent   with  PLUARG
 recommendations that:

          "...actions be taken to  reduce inputs  of toxic substances...;
          (c)onsideration (be given  to)...all potential  nonpoint source
          problems  related  to  agricultural  practices,   including
          erosion,  fertilizer and  pesticide use,  livestock operations
          and drainage..."

Additionally,  PLUARG  concluded  that future  research  was  needed   on  remedial
measures  and their cost-effectiveness.
                                      44

-------
         The  objectives  proposed  under  the  analysis  of  fish  and  wildlife
habitat include reducing the  net  loss of wetlands resulting  from  agricultural
uses to  zero.   PLUARG recognized  the unique  pollution-reduction  capabilities
of wetlands and also recommended their preservation.

         Seven  alternative  strategies  to accomplish  the objectives  proposed
 for  each  resource  area  are  presented  in  the  draft Appraisal  and  Program
 Report.    Detailed  studies  of  these  strategies  will  be  made  during  and
 subsequent  to the  public  review and  comment  period which runs  through March
 28,  1980.

          In  comparison with the rest of  the nation,  the  Great  Lakes region  is
 already  advanced  in recognizing  the  necessity  for,  and  implementing,  both
 physical  and  cultural  practices  for  nonpoint  source control.   As previously
 discussed,  the Wisconsin Nonpoint Source Water Pollution Abatement Program and
 the Lake Erie Wastewater Management Study are currently  addressing  the  problem
 of  nonpoint  source pollution  abatement in different  sections of  the basin.
 Section  108(a)  Demonstration Projects have  provided the  opportunity  to
 evaluate  a  wide  range of  land  management  practices  in  terms  of their
 effectiveness in  reducing  nonpoint  source  problems.   Specifically, studies  at
 Black Creek,  Allen  County,  Indiana,  and  Washington  County,  Wisconsin,  have
 focused   on  best  management  practices  for  agricultural   activities  and  rural
 sediment control.

          Additional  efforts  have   included  work with   models  to  investigate
 nonpoint  source   pollution and methods  of  abatement, as  well as  to  identify
 critical  areas  in the  Great Lakes  basin watersheds.  The  "overview  modeling"
 process,  for  example, has  been used to identify the most cost-effective mix of
 point and nonpoint  controls  for the  basin.    The  research  survey,  discussed
 subsequently  in  this report,  found  a  considerable  number  of  ongoing studies
 into  the  causes  and control of  nonpoint pollution  located  in  the  Great Lakes
 region.
                                         45

-------
  UPDATE  ON 208  WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLANNING

           Since 1973,  208  water  quality  management  agencies  have  identified
  regional  water quality  problems,  developed  solutions  and identified units  of
  government  responsible  for implementation  of  solutions.   During  FYs  80-83
  emphasis  will  be  placed  on  filling  in  the gaps  in  areawide  water  quality
  management  plans.   This will  be accomplished  primarily  through the  use  of
  prototype  problem-solving  projects,  with  the  U.S.   Environmental   Protection
  Agency  (EPA)  providing funding, technical  expertise  and information  transfer
  The  Nationwide Urban Runoff Program,  previously  discussed,  is illustrative of
  this new, more active management approach.

          EPA has  established  four  priority  problem  areas  to be  addressed in
 FYs  80-84:   urban  storm runoff,  nonpoint  sources,  groundwater  quality  and
 waste  treatment   facilities.    Generally,  highest funding  priority will  be
 assigned to programs  addressing urban  stormwater  runoff,  agricultural runoff
 and groundwater protection.   Programs  involving nonpoint source  pollution from
 construction,   mining,  or  silvicultural  activities   will  generally  receive
 secondary priority.   EPA anticipates completion of the  208 grant  program by FY
 83,  given  adequate  funding   for FYs  81,  82 and 83.   At  that  time,  EPA will
 decide  on  the  future direction  of  the Water Quality Management  Program.

         Table  1  shows  the current  status  of  the   water  quality management
 Plans  being  prepared  by each  of  the  agencies  carrying  out  water  quality
 Planning  in the Great  Lakes basin.   To date, 23  of  the completed plans  have
 received state  certification.   Of these,  17  have received EPA approval as  well.

Great Lakes Basin Commission 208 Report Bibliography

         In an  effort  to maximize  the  utilization  of  208 planning information
in  other planning  and management   activities in  the  basin,  a  key-word  coded
bibliography of 208  reports  is  being developed by  the Basin  Commission staff.
The bibliography of  all water quality management  planning reports in  the Great
Lakes basin is  being entered into  the Basin Commission's computer.  Initially,
the bibliography will  contain between 700 to  800  reports,  with additions madl
as necessary.   This  information base will be available  for  use by the  Great
                                       46

-------
                                         TABLE 1

                     STATUS OF 208 PLANNING IN THE GREAT LAKES BASIN
DESIG- FINAL
NATION PLAN
AGENCY DATE DATE
ILLINOIS -
NIPC
Northeastern Illinois Planning Commission 6/13/75 5/79
INDIANA -
ISPCB *
Ind iana Stream Pollution Control Board 5/28/76 5/80
MACOG
Michiana Area Council of Governments 6/11/75 5/78
NIRPC
Northwestern Indiana Regional Planning Comm. 6/06/75 5/78
MICHIGAN
CUPPAD
Central Upper Peninsula Planning & Develop-
ment Regional Commission 5/28/76 3/78
ECMPDRC
East Central Michigan Planning & Development
Regional Commission 6/06/75 9/78
EUPRPDC
STATE
CERTI-
FICATION EPA
DATE APPROVAL

5/80* 6/80*
8/79 10/79
8/79 9/79
9/78 1/79
10/78 2/79

  Development Commission

GLS-V
Genesee-Lapeer-Shiawassee Region V Planning
  Commission

NEMCOG
Northeast Michigan Council of Governments


NMRPC
Northwest Michigan Regional Planning &
  Development Commission

REG.II
Reg ion II Planning Commission
                                               5/28/76    9/78
6/06/75



5/28/76




5/28/76



6/06/75
 9/78


 9/78




12/78


 9/78
10/78



10/78


10/78




 7/78


11/78
 3/79




 2/79



 2/79




11/78



 3/79
                                             47

-------
                                     TABLE 1  (cont'd.)

                       STATUS OF 208 PLANNING  IN THE GREAT LAKES BASIN
AGENCY
MICHIGAN (cont'd.)
SMPC
Southcentral Michigan Planning Council
SEMCOG
Southeast Michigan Council of Governments
SMRPC
Southwestern Michigan Regional Planning Coram.
TCRPC
Tri-County Regional Planning Commission
WMRPC
West Michigan Regional Planning Commission
WMSRDC
West Michigan Shoreline Regional Development
Commission
WUPPDRC
Western Upper Peninsula Planning & Development
Regional Commission
MINNESOTA
MPCA
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
NEW YORK
NYSDEC
New York Department of Environmental
Conservation
CNYRPDB
DESIG-
NATION
DATE
6/06/75
6/06/75
5/28/76
6/19/75
6/19/75
6/19/75
5/28/76
5/28/76
5/28/76

FINAL
PLAN
DATE
10/78
8/78
4/78
4/78
2/78
9/78
9/78
1/80
3/79

STATE
CERTI-
FICATION
DATE
5/78
9/78
9/78
2/78
5/78
11/78
10/78
2/80
12/79

EPA
APPROVAL
9/78
1/79
1/79
7/78
9/78
3/79
2/79
4/80*


Central New York Regional Planning &
  Development Board                            6/09/75    4/79       1/80

ENCRPB
Erie-Niagara Counties Regional Planning Board  6/23/75    2/79       1/80
3/80
4/80
                                             48

-------
                                       TABLE 1 (cont'd.)

                        STATUS OF 208 PLANNING IN THE GREAT LAKES BASIN
AGENCY
OHIO
  OEPA
  Ohio Environmental Protection Agency

  NOACA
  Northeast Ohio Areawide Coordinating Agency

  TMACOG
  Toledo Metropolitan Area Council of
    Governments

PENNSYLVANIA

  PDER
  Pennsylvania Department of Environmental
    Resources

WISCONSIN

  WDNR
  Wisconsin Department  of Natural  Resources

  FVWQPA
  Fox Valley  Water  Quality Planning  Agency

  SEWRPC
  Southeast Wisconsin Regional  Planning  Comm.
                                                  DESIG-    FINAL
                                                  NATION    PLAN
                                                   DATE     DATE
5/28/76


6/16/75



6/25/74    1/77
6/01/76




5/28/76


6/19/75


6/06/75
 /80C


6/79


8/79
                     STATE
                     CERTI-
                    FICATION     EPA
                     DATE      APPROVAL
           3/80
          10/79
          11/78
  /80C


 7/79


12/79
              3/79
/80C
 *  Expected  Date

 a.  The OEPA  Plan is composed  of 13  separate basin reports.   Some have already
    been certified.   All  13 are expected  to be certified by  3/80.

 b.  The Cuyahoga portion  of the Plan is expected to be certified 2/80.

 c.  The WDNR  Plan is composed  of management plans from 21 different planning
    areas. The status of reports from planning areas within the basin is shown
    on the following page:
                                                49

-------
                                     TABLE 1 (cont'd.)

                      STATUS OF 208 PLANNING IN THE GREAT LAKES BASIN
Planning Area

Upper Green Bay
Wolf River Basin
Upper Fox River Basin
Lower Fox River Basin
Twin-Door-Kewaunee
Manitowoc River Basin
Sheboygan River Basin
Upper Milwaukee River Basin
Southeast Wisconsin Regional
  Planning Area
4/80*
4/80
8/79
8/79
(Nonpoint
source
element
only)

9/80*
8/79*
4/80
4/80

8/79
               State
           Certification   EPA
               Date	 Approval
12/79
12/79
(Nonpoint
source
element
only)
9/79
   9/79
(Conditional
approval of
nonpoint source
element only)
12/79
                                         50

-------
Lakes National Program  Office,  as well as by  planning and management agencies
and  the  general  public.   The  bibliography should  be  completed  and  ready  for
outside use by September,  1980.

         A complete list of  the  keywords  presently in use is included in  Table
2.   Reports can be selectively  retrieved from the  system by:   (1) state,  (2)
lake,  (3)  river basin  group,  (4) agency, or  (5) topic  (key  word).   Multiple
specification  retrievals are also possible.   Appendix C  contains  an example of
a  partial  retrieval utilizing  the  keywords:    "Remedial  Measures", "Unit  Area
Loads/Models", and  "Costs" under  "Nonpoint Sources".

FIVE YEAR STRATEGIES

         According  to  Water Quality Management  regulations (40  CFR Part  35,
Subpart  G  [1979]), each  state  must  prepare  and  update annually a  five-year
strategy for controlling  pollution  from  point and  nonpoint sources.   In some
 instances,  designated  208 areawide  planning agencies  prepare  individual  five-
year strategies for  input to  the overall state  report.   A review of programs
 developed  by  state and areawide planning agencies  in  the  basin (Attachment 2)
 identified  a  number  of  study  proposals with  particular  relevance to  Great
 Lakes issues  and   problems.   As results  become  available  from these regional
 studi'es and demonstrations, it  will  be  important to incorporate their findings
 into the evolution and maintenance  of a  comprehensive management strategy  for
 the Great Lakes.

 U.S. AIR QUALITY CONTROL PROGRAMS - IMPLICATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF GREAT
 LAKES WATER QUALITY

          The  Great Lakes  are  particularly susceptible to atmospheric inputs  of
 pollution.    The   following  factors have  been  identified  as  contributing  to
 their sensitivity:

          •  the lakes  are close  to  and often  downwind  of major  sources
             of  pollution;
                                         51

-------
                                  TABLE 2

                              208 BIBLIOGRAPHY
                            KEY WORD DICTIONARY
100  Point Sources
    110  Sources
    120  Projections
    130  Alternatives
    140  Recommendations
    150  Facility Plans

200  Nonpoint Sources
    210  Problems
    220  Remedial Measures
    230  Recommendations
    240  Unit Area Loads/Models
    250  Other
    260  Costs

300 Toxic Substances
    310  Problems
    320  Special Studies
    330  Management Programs

400 Atmospheric Loads

500 Great Lakes Issues
    510  CZM
    520  Great Lakes Water Quality
         521  Recommendations

600 Land Factors
    610Inventory
    620  Projections
    630  Soils/Geology

700 Population
    710   Current
    720   Projected

800 Sludge
    810   Quantity
    820   Disposal Plan
    830   Alternatives/Techniques

 900 River and Lake Basin
     910   Water Quality Assessments
     920   Detailed Studies
     930   Modeling Activities
     940  Wast Load Allocations
     950  Other
1000 Biological Studief

1100 Other Special Studies
     1110 Groundwater
     1120 Water Conservation
     1130 Phosphorus
     1140 Rainfall
     1150 Inland Lakes
     1160 Maps

1200 Wetlands^

1300 Dredging

1400 Management Plan
     1410 Existing Framework
     1420 Alternatives
     1430 Recommendations
     1440 Objectives
     1450 Other
          1451 Economics
          1452  Implementation
          1453 Legislation/Legal Issues
          1454  Report  Summaries

1500 Public Participation

1600 Work Program/5-yr Strategy
     1610 Annual  Work Program
     1620 Five  Year  Strategy

1700 Other
     1710 Environmental  Assessment
                                       52

-------
        •  the  lakes  have  comparatively long  retention times,
           resulting in  relatively  high concentrations  of  even  low
           level inputs;

        •  atmospheric  inputs to  the  Great Lakes  are large  and  are
           readily borne  by runoff;

        •  the low suspended sediment  load  per  unit volume to each of
           the Great Lakes, except Lake  Erie, may contribute to their
           sensitivity.  Higher  volumetric  sediment loads may provide
           more  opportunity for  sorption  of  toxics  and subsequent
           settling out of the water column.  Higher  solids  loads may
           also  serve  to   "dilute"  toxic  concentrations  in  bottom
           sediments; and

        •  The  Great  Lakes region  has considerable potential  for
           further industrial development with  associated deleterious
           effects.

        The  significance of atmospheric  pollutant inputs on Great Lakes water
quality makes consideration of air  pollution control  programs a key element in
the development  of  a Great  Lakes environmental management  strategy.

        The   Great Lakes   Water  Quality Agreement of  1978  provided  for
consideration of atmospheric  inputs  in  Article Vl(l)(L),  stating  that "(i)n
cases  where significant   contributions  to  Great Lakes pollution  from
atmospheric   sources  are   identified,  the Parties  agree  to  consult  on
appropriate  remedial programs."    Similar  concern  was  expressed  in PLUARG's
recommendation that "the role  of atmospheric  inputs  should  be  considered in
the evaluation of  Great  Lakes  pollution,  with  special consideration given to
the sources of major  atmospheric pollutants."

        The   U.S.   national  air  pollution  control  effort  embodies  two
complementary approaches:   the  National Ambient  Air Quali"the role of
atmospheric  inputs  should   be  considered  in   the  evaluation  of  Great Lakes
pollution,  with  special   consideration  given  to  the  sources  of  major
atmospheric pollutants."
                                      53

-------
         The  U.S.  national  air  pollution  control   effort  embodies   two
complementary approaches:   the  National  Ambient Air Quality  Standards  (NAAQS)
program  and  the  National  Emissions  Standards  for  Hazardous  Air  Pollutants
(NESHAPS)  program.    Program regulations  include provision  for  coordination
with  areawide  water  quality management  planning ("208")  programs.   However,
these  provisions  have  generally  not  been  implemented.   Most  inter-program
coordination presently  takes  place at the  federal  level through  the  regional
Intermodal Planning Groups.

         Because U.S.  air  and  water  pollution  control  programs have  evolved
independently,  it may  be extremely difficult to reconcile the  two  in areas of
common concern (e.g.,  toxic  substances  pollution via atmospheric  deposition).
Attachment  3,  "U.S.   Air   Quality  Control   Programs  -  Implications   for
Improvement  of Great   Lakes  Water  Quality,"  examines  ongoing  air  quality
control  programs,  focusing  on  the statutory  and  regulatory requirements  for
air and water pollution control  program coordination.   Air quality programs in
each  of  the Great Lakes  states are  reviewed.   Finally,  the efficacy  of  air
pollution control  programs  in reducing PCB inputs to  the lakes is examined.

STATUS OF THE PHOSPHORUS MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES  TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATIONS

         In  the  1978 Great Lakes  Water Quality  Agreement  between  the  United
States  and  Canada,  the two governments  tentatively agreed  to the  following
target loads for phosphorus  entering Great Lakes surface waters:

                                              Target  Load
                   Basin                    (metric  tons/yr)

                   Lake Superior                  3,400
                   Lake Michigan                  5,600
                   Main Lake Huron                2,800
                   Georgian Bay                     600
                   North Channel                    520
                   Saginaw Bay                      440
                   Lake Erie                     11,000
                   Lake Ontario                   7,000

                                       54

-------
Annex 3  of the  Agreement also  specifies  that the  U.S.  and  Canadian  federal
governments, "in cooperation  with  the State and Provincial  Governments,  shall
...confirm  the  future  phosphorus  loads,  and  based  on  these establish  load
allocations  and compliance   schedules."    The  confirmed  set  of  phosphorus
loading objectives  is due by May 22,  1980.

         The  Phosphorus  Management  Strategies  Task  Force   (PMSTF) ,  a  joint
Water Quality  Board-Science  Advisory Board work group,  is  currently reviewing
the  methodology utilized in  determining the  loading  objectives  and  the
programs and technology  necessary  to  meet  the  objectives.   The final report of
the Task Force  was  expected  in  January,  1980,  but has  not  yet been completed.
However, several  preliminary  subreports,  which presumably will  form the basis
of the final report, have been developed.  These are listed in Table 3.

The  Task  Force  completed  an   Interim  Report  for   the  International  Joint
Commission (UC) in December of  1979.  The  following  is a summary of the major
conclusions  reached in  this  report.   It should be  noted that  these  are only
preliminary  findings which may  be modified  as the  Task Force  continues  its
work.

Phosphorus Loadings

         Total  phosphorus loads to  the  Great  Lakes (for  1976),  considered by
the  Task  Force to be   the  best estimates,  given  the  available data,  are
presented  in Table  4 (PMSTF,  1979).   These estimates  are based  on data from  a
number of  different  sources  and  include  any corrections or updates to the data
base  not  available  in previous  estimates.   These  estimates  were  judged  to be
within  10  to  20  percent of  the actual load  for  the  sources  included  in the
estimates.

         Several  factors were  not  included  in the  Task Force's  estimate of
variability.   These  included  high  flow event sampling data (except  for Lake
Erie)  and  consideration  of  shoreline erosion contributions.   In  the  case of
shoreline  erosion,  the  total  phosphorus  loads  from this source were given (see
Table 4),  although  they  were not counted as part of  the total  load.
 1. The  contribution  of shoreline erosion was  excluded  based on the  assumption
   that  it  is  primarily a  source of unavailable  phosphorus.
 2. These  figures are  also  based  on  an  accumulation of  information from many
   summary  sources.    The  majority  of the  information  was available for water
   years  1975  and  1976.
                                       55

-------
                                    TABLE  3

                     DOCUMENTS  RECEIVED FOR  FINAL  REPORT  OF
                THE PHOSPHORUS  MANAGEMENT  STRATEGIES  TASK FORCE
                            AS  OF DECEMBER 12,  1979
Chapter I.     BACKGROUND

              •     The Laurentian Great Lakes - Ecological  Perspectives
                    5 pages. (Beeton - February 19,  1979)

              •     Phosphorus as Related to Great Lakes Eutrophication -
                    5 pages.  (Beeton - April 3, 1979)
Chapter II.   PHOSPHORUS TARGET LOADS

              •     Development of Target Loads - 23 pages. (Salbach & Rast)


Chapter III.  EVALUATION OF PHOSPHORUS INPUTS TO THE GREAT LAKES

              •     PLUARG Report on Differences in Great Lakes Phosphorus
                    Load Estimates - 27 pages.  (Rast & Gregor - February,
                    1979)

              •     Analysis of Phosphorus Loads - 6 pages.  (Mancini)

              •  •  Draft of Chapter III - (Mancini et al.) - 25 pages,
                    December 6, 1979.
Chapter IV.   IMPACT OF PHOSPHORUS LOADS ON PHOSPHORUS, ALGAL, OXYGEN LEVELS
              IN GREAT LAKES

              •     Review and Evaluation of Models - 30 pages.  (O'Connor)

              •  •  Revised Chapter IV - Review and Evaluation of Models -
                    38 pages.  (O'Connor - November 28, 1979)
Chapter V.    COSTS AND TECHNOLOGIES OF PHOSPHORUS CONTROL

              •     Outline - Costs and Technology for Phosphorus Control -
                    7 pages.  (Schmidtke)

              •     Point  Sources - 11 pages.  (Van Fleet - November 1, 1979)

              •     Detergent Phosphorus Substitutes (Carlson - November 1,
                    1979)
                                        56

-------
                               TABLE 3 (cont'd.)
Chapter V.  (cont'd.)
                    Gross Estimates of POTW Phosphorus  Load to the Great Lakes
                    and Cost of Alternative Strategies  (U.S. EPA - MERL)

                    Phosphorus Removal Using Land Treatment Systems -
                    13 pages.  (Loehr - August 17,  1979)

                    Sludge Production as a Result of Phosphorus Removal -
                    16 pages.  (Loehr & Naylor - September 17, 1979)

                    Management of Nonpoint Sources of Phosphorus - 17 pages.
                    (Bangay - October, 1979 - revised draft)

                 •  Chapter V - Costs and Technologies  of Phosphorus Control
                    (Schmidtke) - preliminary consolidation of above reports -
                    December 5, 1979.
Chapter VI.   STRATEGIES AND RECOMMENDATIONS

              •     Strategies for Assessing the Social and Economic Impacts
                    of Great Lakes Phosphorus Management - 13 pages.  (Bangay
                    & Peskin - October, 1979)
Chapter VII.  SUMMARY
                                       57

-------
Table  5  compares  the  Task  Force's  initial  estimates  with  annual  total
                                                                             2
phosphorus loads  for  the mid-1970s  compiled  by Chapra  and  Sonzogni (1979).
As shown, the  figures are very  close in value.  In  fact,  they are within the
+20 percent  error noted  previously.

         Differences between the two estimates may be largely explained by the
time frame difference  (1976 versus  mid-1970s).   As  discussed  in Sonzogni et
al. (1980),  considerable differences exist from year to year in  tributary flow
and, therefore, the phosphorus  load.

         Not   surprisingly,  the  PMSTF  loads  are, with  the  exception  of Lake
Erie,   identical  to  the  loads reported  in PLUARG.   The  difference in the Lake
Erie load can be explained by  a  revised estimate of point  source inputs,  as
explained in  Sonzogni et al. (1980).  Overall, given  the update  for  Lake Erie,
the PMSTF appears to have agreed that  the  loads  developed  by PLUARG (the U.S.
loads were compiled by  GLBC  staff)  are the  best  available at  this time.

Phosphorus Availability

         The  Task  Force  is  also   evaluating  the  question  of  phosphorus
availability  and  its significance in formulating management  strategies  for the
Great   Lakes.   A  review  of  recent   studies  concerned  with  phosphorus
availability  highlighted  the paucity  of research  in this  area.    Additional
information  is needed  on the relationship of the operationally-defined  forms
of  phosphorus (non-apatite  inorganic P, organic P,  apatite  inorganic  P, NaOH
extractable  P,  etc.)   and  their  relation  to   the   form  utilized  by  algae.
Studies  are   needed  to  compare chemical  and biological methods of measuring
phosphorus  availability  and  to  determine the  correlation  between algal
bioassay  data and  lake  biomass  response.   Additional  research  efforts  are  also
needed  to determine  the  significance of the  proximity of  the phosphorus source
to  the  receiving water in terms of in-lake phosphorus availability.

          Although   it  did  not   arrive   at   a  firm  conclusion  regarding  its
significance,  the PMSTF has clearly highlighted the  importance  of considering
phosphorus  availability in management  decisions.   They did  not  indicate  that
evidence  to  date suggests that a large  portion  of  the  phosphorus delivered  to

                                       58

-------
                                    TABLE 4
                    "BEST" ESTIMATE OF 1976 PHOSPHORUS LOAD
                                 (metric tons)
          Direct    Direct  Tributary          Urban  Upstream       Shoreline
Lake     Municipal Industrial Total Atmosphere Direct   Load   Total  Erosion
SUPERIOR
MICHIGAN
HURON
ERIE
ONTARIO
72
1,041
126
6,292
2,093
103
38
38
275
82
2,455
3,596
2,901
9,960
4,047
1,566
1,682
1,129
774
488
16
—
16
44
324
—
—
657
1,080
4,769
4,212
6,357
4,867
18,425
11,803
3,800
3,700
794
10,526
1,280
*   consists  of  indirect  point  sources  and  nonpoint  sources  in  tributary  basin.
                                    TABLE  5
              A COMPARISON  OF ESTIMATES OF  TOTAL  PHOSPHORUS  LOADING
                                TO  THE GREAT  LAKES
                                (metric tons/year)
                 Total  Loading  Excluding
               	Shoreline Erosion	
               PMSTF     Chapra & Sonzogni
 Lake          (1976)        (mid 1970s)
	Shoreline Erosion
PMSTF     Chapra & Sonzogni
(1976)       (mid 1970s)
 SUPERIOR       4,212          4,000
 MICHIGAN       6,357          6,950
 HURON          4,867          5,472
 ERIE          18,425         19,047
 ONTARIO       11,803         10,444
 3,800          3,800
 3,700          3,700
   794            700
10,526         10,450
 1,280          1,300
                                        59

-------
the Great Lakes via tributaries is not  biologically  available.   This  point  was
made in  the  PLUARG  report  as well as  in  Sonzogni  et al.  (1980).  While  it  is
agreed that  additional research  is  needed on  the  biological availability  of
phosphorus,  there  is   enough  information  in existence  to  indicate that  fine-
tuning of  our phosphorus management  strategies must  include the fact that  a
significant  portion of  the  nonpoint  source  phosphorus  input  is in  a  non-
available form.  Moreover,  it would  seem  to  indicate that  our current emphasis
on  controlling  point   sources appears  to  be  a correct one.   Some  additional
information  on  the  effect  of phosphorus  availability  on management  strategies
is being prepared as  part  of the Basin Commission's  Great  Lakes Environmental
Planning  Study (GLEPS).    Preliminary  information  is  being  supplied  to  the
PMSTF.

Assessment of Phosphorus Models

         As  one of its  work  efforts,   the   Task   Force   is   conducting  an
assessment of  the models  used in the development of  the  target  loads proposed
in  the Agreement.   Based  on  an initial  assessment,  it has  concluded  that  the
models can provide  reasonable estimates of the total phosphorus  concentrations
for  Lake  Ontario  and  dissolved  oxygen  concentrations  for Lake   Erie.
Uncertainties  in  the   model  structure  are in  the  range of  10  to 30 percent,
insufficient  to preclude  their  use in the formulation  of  alternate  management
strategies.

Point Source Control

         One  of the major  objectives  of the  PMSTF's study  is  to  determine
whether  or  not  it  would   be  advisable to   require  phosphorus  removal  at
municipal  treatment  plants  in the Erie  and  Ontario  basins  to  the 0.5 mg/L  P
level.   At the  present time this  question is unresolved.   However, preliminary
indications  are that  across-the-board  requirements   for  the 0.5 mg/L  limit
would not  be practical.   Rather,  it  appears that  a  stepped or staged approach
will be  advocated, wherein  the 1.0 mg/L limit  is emphasized  for  the  time being
and the  effects of  this action  evaluated.  This might be accomplished by using
a  demonstration program whereby  the  effect of  phosphorus control  on  a portion
of  the   Great  Lakes (e.g.,   Saginaw  or  Green  Bay  which have  relatively  short

                                       60

-------
response times)  could be carefully evaluated.  The demonstration  program might
include  testing  of  different  removal  efficiencies  at  municipal  treatment
plants.   Another  possibility  would  be  to encourage  an  intermediary  control
level between 1.0  or 0.5  mg/L P,  since  some  plants  can achieve  somewhat  less
than 1.0 mg/L simply by efficient plant  operation  (i.e.,  no additional cost is
likely to be involved).  While  this  should  surely  be encouraged,  the reduction
in loading which would be achieved is small.

         The  above possibilities are  consistent  with the  Great  Lakes  Basin
Conmission's  reconmendation  (GLBC,   1979a;  GLBC  1979b)  for  phosphorus control
at  municipal  plants.     A  staged   implementation  program  designed   to  meet
regional  needs  could  provide  the feedback  information necessary  to  fill  the
gaps  in  the  current  status  of our  knowledge  regarding  effects,  costs,  and
benefits  of various phosphorus control  strategies.    In  this  manner,  the most
cost-effective  control  measures  could  be  identified  and  recommended  for
implementation.

Nonpoint  Source  Control

          The  PMSTF  is  also  considering  how,  or  to  what  extent,   nonpoint
 sources should  be  reduced.   At  present,  no  information is available  from the
 PMSTF which  might result in  their  reaching  a  conclusion  different   from the
 PLUARG   findings.     Furthermore,  the   IJC's   response  to  the  PLUARG
 recommendations  may have  a  bearing on  any recommendations on nonpoint  source
 control  that  the  PMSTF  may  make.1   It  is  thus  expected  that  the  nonpoint
 source  control  recommendations  of  the  PMSTF  will be  similar   to  the  Basin
 Conmission's  recommendation  regarding   implementation of  a  nonpoint  source
 control  program  (i.e.,  implementation  of  essentially voluntary  measures  that
 will not require large public or private expenditures).
 1.  At the  time of  this writing,  the  IJC  review  was complete  but  not  yet
     available.
                                        61

-------

-------
                                   CHAPTER 3

                        POLLUTANT LOADINGS TO THE LAKES
UPDATE ON TRIBUTARY MONITORING PROJECTS

         PLUARG's  final  report  to the  IJC  underscored the  need  for expanding
tributary monitoring  programs to  improve the  accuracy  and precision  of load
estimates (IJC,  1978).   Additionally,  such studies would  serve  to monitor the
effectiveness of  point  and nonpoint source pollution  control  programs, aid in
setting  priorities for  future control  programs,  and  provide  baseline  data by
which  the  effectiveness of  future  programs may be assessed.  At  this  time, a
number of tributary monitoring programs are underway in the  basin.

Ohio

         The  river mouth  sampling program for Ohio tributaries to Lake Erie  is
 approximately 50  percent  complete  (as of February,  1980)  (Baker, 1980).   The
 sampling  program  will  include  the spring  runoff events   of  1980.    In  this
 study,  storm  event  transport  of  sediments,  nutrients  and metals  are  being
 monitored  by the  USGS  at 13 river  mouth stations.   Sample analysis  is  being
 conducted  at the  Heidelberg  Water  Quality  Laboratory.  The resulting  chemical
 data, along  with  the associated stream  flow data, will be used to calculate
 annual  loadings  of materials to Lake  Erie  from Ohio  streams.   Data  from  the
 program will  be  incorporated   into  the  USGS  annual  publication  of  Water
 Resources  Data  for Ohio.   The data will  also  be placed in the  STORET system,
 making it available  for  use by a wide range  of  agencies,  including local  and
 regional planning authorities.

          An  important  part  of  the  Heidelberg Water Quality Laboratory's Post-
 PLUARG  work  is to generate  additional  information   on  the  biological
 availability of  the  phosphorus  associated with  the tributary  load.   Apparently
 no  information  has been  generated to  date  on phosphorus  availability.
 Hopefully this information will be forthcoming in the near  future.

                                        63

-------
         As previously mentioned, water quality monitoring  is  also underway in
the  upper  Honey  Creek  watershed  to  determine   the  effect  of  agricultural
pollutant  abatement  demonstration  projects on water  quality.    The  Heidelberg
Water  Quality Laboratory,  under  contract with the  U.S.  Army  Corps  of
Engineers,  is  conducting  a biological  survey at   six  points within  the upper
drainage reaches to  provide baseline  data  for subsequent  studies of the effect
of widespread  adoption of  no-till  practices  on the stream community structure.
The  study  is  scheduled for completion  by  July 1,  1980,  and will  also  include
information on phosphorus loading from rural  septic systems.

         The Heidelberg  Water Quality  Laboratory is  also  under contract with
the U.S.  Army  Corps  of Engineers  to  continue their detailed  stream transport
studies  of nutrients  and  sediments  at six  locations in  the  Sandusky River
basin  for  the  1980 water  year.   A component of   the  third phase of  the Lake
Erie Wastewater  Management Study  (LEWMS), data  will  be  utilized  to evaluate
the  water  quality   effects  of  tillage demonstration projects  and  modeling
efforts  underway  in  the  basin.   Storm  transport  studies  are also scheduled to
be conducted during spring  runoff events at  Bean  Creek,  the West Branch of the
Rocky  River,  and  the Ottawa  River  (three  of the  five additional  basins to be
studied under Phase III of LEWMS).

         The final report  of  Heidelberg College Water  Quality  Laboratory's two
and  one-half  year   study   for  EPA on  "Fluvial   Transport  and  Processing  of
Sediments  and  Nutrients   from Nonpoint  Sources"  in northwestern  Ohio  and the
Sandusky basin is currently in  preparation.   A detailed  study of  the data will
be conducted utilizing the  fluvial transport model developed  by the U.S. Army
Corps  of  Engineers.    Annual  variability  in  nutrient  and  sediment   yields,
sediment  delivery  ratios  and  variations in nutrient/sediment  ratios  will also
be investigated.

Wisconsin

         Another  Post-PLUARG  tributary monitoring program has  recently been
funded  for Wisconsin.   The  activity is  being   carried  out by  the Wisconsin
Department  of  Natural Resources (WDNR)  in cooperation with USGS.   The Water
Chemistry  Laboratory  at  the  University  of  Wisconsin-Madison  will  also  be

                                       64

-------
utilized  to  determine  the   biological  availability  of  phosphorus  and  the
particle  size  distribution  in  the  suspended  solids  of  a  select  number  of
samples.

         Runoff event  and baseflow  samples  will be collected  at  the mouths of
seven  Lake  Michigan tributaries:   the East  Twin, Pigeon,  Branch,  Manitowoc,
Sheboygan,  Cedar,  and  the  Milwaukee.   EPA  is currently  considering funding
monitoring  activities  on the  Fox and Menomonee  rivers also.   Water quality/
quantity monitoring  will begin  on  the first  group of  tributaries  within the
next few months.

         All of  the  tributaries included in  the monitoring  program drain  land
use  activities  identified  as  potential  contributors  of  nonpoint  source
pollution.   Large  portions  of  all   of  the  watersheds  support  agricultural
activities  (identified by PLUARG as   the major diffuse source  contributor of
phosphorus).   Additionally,   the Pigeon River  watershed is  dominated by  clay
soils  which were identified  by  PLUARG as  contributing the greatest amounts of
phosphorus.  Monitoring  of  the Pigeon River will  provide particularly valuable
information on unit  phosphorus loadings for  agricultural  activities  on  fine-
textured  soils.

1977-78 RIVER  MOUTH  LOADINGS

          In 1978,  the  IJC  published  a report prepared by the Great  Lakes  Basin
Commission  staff for  U.S. EPA, Region V,  entitled "United States  Great  Lakes
Tributary  Loadings."   In  that  report,  a  detailed  analysis of  1975  and  1976
U.S.  tributary  loads  was  presented.    Much valuable  information was obtained
from  this  work, but it  was   recognized  that  additional data  for future  years
were  needed to more fully  understand the  impact  of  tributary loadings.   This
became another  task  of  the  Post-PLUARG   Agreement:    to  calculate  tributary
 loads   from U.S.  tributaries  for  water   years   1977  and  1978.    Appendix  D
presents  the  results of  the  loading  calculations  which  can  be  compared
directly  with Appendix A of  Sonzogni et al.  (1978).  A more  detailed analysis
of these  loads will be  conducted under  the  second portion of the  Post-PLUARG
Agreement to be  completed by  September of  1980.
                                        65

-------
         A quick examination of Appendix D will  reveal  that  there are no loads
for Lake Erie.  As was  discussed  in  Sonzogni et al.  (1978),  it is important to
utilize  the  Lake  Erie  Wastewater  Management  Study  (LEWMS)  work  in obtaining
tributary  loads  for  Lake  Erie.     Individual   river  mouth  loads  were  not
available  from  the U.S.  Army  Corps  of  Engineers at  this  time,  but  will  be
presented in the upcoming report.

Data Sources

         River  mouth  loads  were   calculated   using  the  best   available
concentration and flow  information.   Every  effort was  made to utilize all data
available  for  any given tributary  to  maximize  the confidence  in  a  loading
estimate.  Primary sources  of  data  included  state water surveillance programs,
U.S.  Geological  Survey  programs,  and  other  work  done  by  universities  and
special state or federal  projects.

         In general,  data on the  four parameters considered  were available for
major U.S.  Great  Lakes  tributaries.   Appendix D  indicates  the  number  of flow
and concentration data  pairs that were used  in each  loading calculation.

         The primary  source of  daily and mean  annual flow information was U.S.
Geological  Survey Water  Resources  Data  reports.    Some  state  surveillance
programs  also  collected  flow data (generally   at  the  time  of   the  sample
collection).  These were  used where  appropriate.

Base Years

         All  loadings  were  calculated  by  water  year  as standardized  by the
U.S. Geological Survey.

Watershed Areas

         In  this  report, tributaries and their  watersheds have  been organized
according  to  individual tributaries, hydrologic areas,  river basin  groups, and
lake  basins  following  the  procedure used  in  Subactivity  2-1  of U.S.  Task D,
PLUARG  (Hall  et al.,  1976) .   Each  of  the  72 hydrologic areas  consists of  a

                                       66

-------
single major  watershed  or  a  complex of  small  watersheds draining  individual
tributaries.  Hydrologic  areas  are grouped  into  15  larger river  basin groups
(River  Group in  Appendix D)  which  contain  anywhere from one  to  eight
hydrologic areas.  Each lake basin consists  of  two  or  more river basin groups.
A  description of  the U.S.  tributaries,  their  organization and maps  of their
drainage basins has been previously recorded in Hall et al. (1976).

         Additional  information  on the watershed areas used  in this study may
be  found  in  Sonzogni  et al. (1978).   Watershed  area measurements were  obtained
primarily  from  the Great  Lakes  Basin Framework  Study,  Appendix  1, "Alternative
Frameworks".    Additional  drainage  area  information,   especially   for  areas
containing  the  smaller  rivers,  was   obtained  from  a  computerized  list  of
watershed  areas  compiled  for  the Conservation Needs Inventory by the U.S. Soil
Conservation  Service.

Correcting Loads  to the River Mouth

          Not  all  chemical  stations and flow gaging stations are located  at  the
 river  mouth.    In  order  to   present   a  total  river  mouth  load  in  these
 situations,   it  was necessary  to adjust  flow  to  account for  the  area  below
monitoring stations.

          In  order  to  adjust  flow measurements  to the  river  mouth, gage  flow
 was multiplied by  the ratio of  the  total drainage  area over  the gaged drainage
 area.  For example, if  a river  drains  a  total  area of 1,000  square  kilometers,
 but  the  farthest  downstream  flow gage is located  15  river  kilometers upstream
 from the  mouth and  accounts  for only 900  square kilometers,  the  gaged  flow
 would  be  multiplied by  1,000/900 or  1.11  to  provide a corrected  flow.   All
 flows  used   in  loading  calculations  in  this  report  were  corrected   in  this
 manner, if not already reported as  accounting  for the total watershed drainage
 area.
          In most  cases,  chemical monitoring  stations were  located  at  or very
 near  the  river mouth.   Consequently,  no concentration  adjustments  were made;
 and  it  was assumed  that  concentrations  at  the mouth  were the  same  as those
 measured  at  the monitoring  station.   An exception  to  this procedure occurred
                                        67

-------
 if  the  monitoring station was above  a major impoundment.  In those  few  cases,
 the  load was calculated  at the point  above  the  impoundment.

 Method  of Calculating Loadings

         Loadings  for  this  report  were calculated  using  the  ratio  estimator
 method,  employing a computer  program developed  specifically  for applying  the
 calculation method (Clark, 1976).   This method has been widely reviewed  and is
 generally  accepted  by  the Great  Lakes research  and  surveillance community  as
 the  preferred  and,  importantly,  standard  method  for  calculating  tributary
 loads.   For  a  further  explanation of the ratio estimator  used, see  Sonzogni et
 al.  (1978).

         The quantity  of rainfall  and runoff varies significantly from year to
 year  and among the  lakes.   Because watershed  yield  is an important  factor  in
 determining  the  tributary  load,   runoff   conditions  should  be examined   in
 ascertaining  the  significance  of the  load.   A detailed  examination of flow
 variations will be  presented in the  next  Post-PLUARG  report.   At present,  it
 should  be noted that the year  1975,  and in  particular  1976, were years of very
 high  flows  (relative to  the  long-term historical  flow)  for  all  of  the  lakes
 except  Superior.   1977  was  a very  low flow year for all of the  lakes.   In
 1978, flows returned to  average or above average  conditions.

         In  calculating  river mouth  loads, an understanding  of  the  influence
 of high flow events is  also  crucial.   For example,  for  tributaries draining
 into parts of  Lake  Erie it is clear  that  high  flow events have  a major  impact
 on the  total  load of sediment and  certain chemical  substances.   However,  the
 relationship between flow and  concentration varies widely over  the  U.S.  Great
Lakes basin.   It should  be noted here  that  all  data,  including high  flow event
data that were available, were used in calculating river mouth loads.

OVERVIEW MODELING ACTIVITIES

         At  the  request  of  U.S.  EPA's Great  Lakes  National Program Office,
 Basin  Commission  staff  have  proposed  ways in  which  the overview modeling
 process developed as part of the PLUARG study (Johnson  et  al., 1978; Heidtke  et

                                       68

-------
al.,  1979a)  could  be presented  for  use  by local decision makers  in choosing
among alternative point  and nonpoint pollution control strategies.   The unique
potential of  this  process for  use  as  a planning tool  in localized long-term
watershed  management,  both  within  and  outside  the  Great  Lakes   basin,  is
discussed  in Attachment  4,  "Methodology  for Choosing Among  Alternatives  to
Reduce Pollutant Contributions  from Watersheds."

         The overview modeling  process has also recently  been used  to generate
estimates  of  U.S.  current and   future  total  phosphorus  and heavy metal  inputs
to  the Great Lakes  under a variety  of  management  scenarios (Heidtke  et a^. ,
1979b;  Heidtke  et al. ,  1980).    An updated  information base  was compiled  for
these  studies,  primarily  from local water quality management ("208") plans.

Total  Phosphorus Loadings

          Results  of the  study  on  future U.S. phosphorus  loadings  reveal  that
 achievement of a  1.0  mg/L  total  phosphorus effluent limitation at municipal
 sewage  treatment  plants  (greater  than  1 mgd)  would  result in  almost a  60
 percent reduction in U.S. municipal  input of phosphorus  between the mid-1970s
 and 1990.   Although a gradual  increase in  the  annual U.S. municipal  load  is
 expected between  1990  and  2000,  the  input   should remain  well  below mid-1970
 levels.    Full  implementation of  the  1  mg/L  phosphorus limitation  was
 identified  as the most critical  step  in a  cost-effective  reduction  of
 phosphorus loadings to the Great Lakes.

          Very  little  change  is  projected  in  the  total  phosphorus  load
 contributed  from  rural  runoff (assuming no   additional runoff control measures
 are  implemented).   Based on  projected  land use changes,  it  is expected that
 the  rural  runoff load  will exhibit  a  downward  trend in  the  future with the
 greatest decrease expected  in  the  Lake  Erie  basin.   Remedial  programs  designed
 to  reduce the input from rural  runoff  were studied  and  compared  on the basis
 of  cost-effectiveness  (cost  per metric  ton  reduction  in  lake loading).
 Voluntary  sound management  practices  such as proper  application of fertilizers
 and manure,  general  conservation  plowing   techniques,  mulching,  etc.,   were
 determined  to  be  extremely  cost-effective but  generally   unlikely  to
 significantly  reduce   phosphorus  loadings.    More extensive control  programs

                                         69

-------
were not  determined  to be  cost-effective.   However, preliminary  results  from
the Lake Erie Wastewater Management Study (LEWMS) have  shown  that  costs may be
much less and that a net benefit may result  for some regions.

         The  study  revealed that the  phosphorus  loading contributed  by urban
runoff will  remain  relatively  constant over the next two  decades  (assuming no
additional  remedial  measures  are  implemented).    Mechanisms  for  controlling
urban  runoff were not  found to  be cost-effective  in  terms  of the  reduction
achieved  in  the annual  total  phosphorus load  to   the  Great  Lakes.   However,
such programs may significantly reduce heavy metal  loadings to the  lakes.

Heavy Metal Loadings

         The overview modeling process was  used  to  generate  annual loadings of
lead,  zinc,  copper  and  cadmium  to the  Great  Lakes from U.S. municipal point
sources  and  land drainage.   Estimates  revealed  that  Lake  Erie  receives  the
largest  input  of heavy metals  from municipal  point sources  and urban runoff,
while Lake Michigan receives the greatest loading from rural  land drainage.

         Implementation  of phosphorus  control  programs  should  result  in
increased  metal  removal  efficiencies,   significantly  reducing  heavy  metal
loadings  to   Lake  Erie  and Lake  Ontario  over  the  next  few  years.   It  is
expected  that  by the  year  1990 municipal  inputs  to these  two  lakes  will  be
roughly 25 to 30 percent  less  than  mid-1970 levels.  Municipal  inputs of heavy
metals  to Lakes  Superior,  Michigan   and  Huron  are not  expected  to  change
significantly over the next two decades.

         Heavy  metal  loadings  from  rural  runoff  are expected  to  remain
relatively constant (assuming no  additional  remedial measures  are  implemented)
over  the  next  few  years.    Estimates  obtained  from  running  a  low-cost,
voluntary land management  scenario  indicate that metal  inputs from  rural  land
would be  reduced by less  than  7  percent.  More  extensive  management  practices
result  in an  additional  load  reduction of  less   than  10 percent.    Thus  it
appears  that  remedial programs  to  control   rural  runoff,  although  desirable,
are not likely to significantly reduce metal loadings to the  lakes.
                                       70

-------
         Study results  indicate  that  heavy  metal   loadings  associated  with
urban runoff  will  increase  from 10 to  20  percent  in the Lake  Michigan,  Lake
Huron, Lake Erie and Lake Ontario basins (without additional remedial programs
to control urban runoff).  While urban runoff controls result in comparatively
small  phosphorus  load  reductions,  they appear  to   be  effective  in reducing
metal   inputs  to  the  lakes.    Remedial  programs,   such  as   frequent
steeetsweeping, could be  expected  to  reduce metals  input by approximately 40
percent  by the  year  2000.   Estimates  indicate  that more  extensive control
programs,  such  as  streetsweeping in conjunction with  detention and  treatment
of  stormwaters and  combined  sewer  overflows,  result  in a 60 percent  reduction
in metal  loadings.

          These studies emphasize the  importance   of  evaluating  remedial
programs  on  a  comprehensive  basis .    Management  programs shown  to  be
comparatively  cost-effective in  reducing phosphorus   loading  from land drainage
may  have  little  effect  on  the  input  of  heavy  metals  to  the  lakes.
Alternatively, measures  which  may result  in  significant  reductions   in metals
loading  may  not  be of  critical  importance,  in view of the current lack of
evidence  that metal inputs are  creating  problems in  the Great Lakes.  Further,
the  high cost of  urban runoff  control  must be  considered  in  relation  to the
potential benefit  from  decreased metal inputs to the  Great Lakes.
                                       71

-------

-------
                                  CHAPTER 4

                        SURVEY OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH
             ON THE  CAUSES AND CONTROL OF NONPOINT SOURCE POLLUTION
         A survey  was  conducted  by  the  Basin  Commission staff  to summarize
current  research  efforts on  the  causes and  control  of  nonpoint  source
pollution.    The  review focused  on  research  activities being  carried  out at
universities  and research stations,  primarily  in  the Great Lakes states.

         Several  sources  were  utilized  to  obtain  information on  ongoing
                  2
research projects.    A retrieval made on  WRE, the Water Resource  Research data
base of  the  Water  Resource Scientific Information Center  (part  of the Office
of  Water  Research  and  Technology,  U.S.  Department  of  Interior)  accessed
information  from the Smithsonian  Science  Information Exchange.  Another source
of  information was  the   "Catalog  of  Federal  Ocean  Pollution  Research
Development  and Monitoring  Programs,  Fiscal Years  1978-1980".  Studies funded
by  National   Oceanic  and   Atmospheric  Administration  programs  (Great Lakes
Program,  Sea Grant)  and  Environmental  Protection Agency programs  (Great Lakes
Program,  Great  Lakes  National  Program)   were reviewed  for research  involving
nonpoint source pollution.

         The  greatest  number of  ongoing research projects were  obtained from  a
retrieval  made  on  the  Current  Research   Information  System (CRIS), maintained
by  the USDA  Cooperative  State Research Service.   The  search was  limited to  the
eight  basin  states and  uncovered  a  number of pertinent  studies  (roughly  400)
sponsored or  conducted  by  USDA  research  agencies,   state  agricultural
experiment   stations,  state  forestry  schools,  and  other  cooperating  state
institutions.  Approximately 50 of the projects  identified,  dealing with
 1. Atmospheric  sources  of  pollution,  with the exception of wind  erosion,  were
   not  included  in the subject matter.   It was  felt  that  this  would  involve  a
   whole other  realm of study.
 2. Projects  active during the years 1979-1980 were included.
                                       73

-------
phosphorus and  sediment  control,  agricultural  land use,  and  the economics of
implementing  pollution  control  measures,   were  singled   out  as  being
particularly  relevant  to Post-PLUARG  interests.   Descriptions of  these
research  projects  are  contained   in  Appendix  E.    Detailed  information was
requested from the  researchers  involved  in a  number  of these projects.

POLLUTION FROM AGRICULTURAL LAND USE

         Agricultural  land use is  the  major   diffuse  source  contributor of
phosphorus to  each  of  the Great  Lakes,  with  the  exception  of Lake  Superior
(PLUARG,  1978).   Its significance is underscored  by  the proportionally  large
number of research  projects involving  agricultural  sources of  pollution.

         Modeling activities underway include studies  of the dynamics  of  water
and  pollutant  movement  in  rural soils,  estimation of  the volume of  runoff and
sediment  yield  from small  agricultural  watersheds,  and  estimation  of the
magnitude  of  nitrogen  and phosphorus in  runoff  from agricultural  land.   At
Cornell  University,  modeling  of  phosphorus  inputs  to upper  New York  State's
Finger  Lakes  is  currently  underway.   Schaffner  and Oglesby (1978)  determined
phosphorus loadings  to  the   13   lakes,  based  on a  composite  species of
phosphorus and  by  expressing  loadings  as the  amount  added to  the  lake mixed
zone.   Further work  by  Oglesby and  Schaffner (1978) examined  lake response to
mixed zone loading as an interrelated series of regression models.   The use of
simple  components  in  the  models,  and   the  fact   that  the  parameters (e.g.,
transparency)   can be  directly  observed  by the  public,  make this a potentially
useful  tool for developing  strategies  for water  quality management.

         Other  agricultural   studies   are  evaluating  various  management
techniques' effects  on  water quality.   These include:    effects of  removal of
crop   residues;   tillage-mulch   effects   on   erosion  and   infiltration;
effectiveness   of soil  and  water conservation practices  for pollution  control;
effects  of different feedlot  waste management  systems on water quality,   soil
loss  and  nutrient   transport   under  various  conditions;  and  the  effects of
different  pasture  and  crop management  systems  on the   levels  of  nutrients,
pesticides, and sediments contributed  from watersheds.
                                       74

-------
POLLUTION FROM FEEDLQTS

         Several  projects  in the region  are  investigating the  feasibility of
using  different  management  treatments  to control the  discharge  of pollutants
below active feedlots.    Runoff   from  livestock  feedlots  has  long  been
recognized  as a  potential  source  of  pollution,  and  runoff  catchment basins
have  been  used  as  the  best method  of  control.   However,  these  basins are
expensive   and   often  require  the  purchase  of   additional   equipment.
Additionally,  they can present  odor  problems  if  not  maintained properly.  The
use  of non-structural methods,  especially  vegetated  buffer strips, has  proven
effective   in  reducing  both nutrients  and microorganisms  in  feedlot  runoff
 (Thompson  et al._, 1978; Young  et al..  1980).   Previous work by Young  and Holt
 (1977) and Young and Mutchler  (1976)  indicates  that  the  practice  of  spreading
manure on  frozen  soil  or  on  top  of  snow may  not  be  as hazardous  as  once
 thought,  depending  on the  conditions  under  which  it  is  applied   (soil  type,
 slope, plowed  or unplowed  land, cover type,  etc.).   However, there  has been
 insufficient  research  on  the  extent  to  which  winter spreading  causes  water
 pollution.

          The use of buffer  strips is considered  by many 208 agencies  to be one
 of  the best  available management  practices  for  controlling  pollution from
 livestock  waste  and  agricultural   runoff.    However,   the  parameters  for the
 design  of buffer  strips  are  generally  unavailable.    A study by  Aull  (1979)
 compares  two  types  of  buffer configurations.   Cropland runoff is viewed  on the
 scale  of  one  farm  or  field,  in  which  case  runoff  acts less  like a nonpoint
 source  and more  like  an  intermittent  point  source.   The use of  a discrete
 vegetated  buffer  area,  instead  of  a  filter  strip  along  the  length  of  a
 watercourse,  appears promising  for reducing  pollution loadings  while  at the
 same  time  occupying a  smaller  land  area.

 ECONOMICS  OF  CONTROLLING  POLLUTION  FROM  AGRICULTURAL ACTIVITIES

           One  of PLUARG's  recommendations  under  agricultural  land use was that
 any water  quality  plans   to be implemented  by  farmers  must  be  "commensurate
 with the  farmers'  ability to  sustain an  economically viable operation."  The
  economics  of  a number   of   agricultural  source  control methods  are  being
                                         75

-------
                         OI             ncuae:    aetemmatlon  o£  .COM
  .H.ei..t methods available  to  achieve  alternate  levels of        im
  an, ysis of  eh.  af£.ct.  of  pestic.de ^^.^  ibatement  poiici^   •
  produce.. costs  and   £ood  and  fiber
                                                                  o     e  cost_
  effective.*.. of various  control ..easures  for nitrogen and phosphorus runoff
  an  investigation  of  alternative ^etnods  and rates of  disposal  ol Micip^
  and £eedlot  ua8tes „„  agricultural  land  (to detemine lh.  ee
-------
consisting  of  technical  assistance,  federal  cost  sharing,  and  local  level
management.   It is  assumed  that, because  SWCPs  reduce  the amount   of  eroded
soil  and  runoff (the principal  carriers  of potential water  pollutants),  they
therefore  improve  water  quality.   This hypothesis  has not  been  well studied.
While  SWCPs  may reduce  some  water  pollutants, they may  not be cost-effective
mechanisms  for  nonpoint   source   control.    Cultural  measures,  such  as
controlling  the  application  of manure,  fertilizer,  and pesticides, may be more
effective  and efficient  than  control of runoff in some situations.

          The Section 208 program and several large demonstration  projects have
 illustrated  that  BMPs  can  be planned  and  that  conservation  programs  can be
 implemented.  However,  the actual water  quality  benefits attributable to many
 of  these  best  management   practices,  and the  impact  resulting  from   their
 installation,  still  remains  largely  unknown.
                                         77

-------

-------
                                  CHAPTER 5

                UPDATE ON PLUARG FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
         The  preceding  chapters  have  summarized  and  provided  updated
information on  a number  of  activities  and  programs  concerned  with  the
abatement  of  nonpoint  source  pollution.    It  is  apparent  that progress
continues to be made in developing a  technical  and  management  base upon which
to build an  environmental  management  strategy  for  the  Great  Lakes  system.
This chapter will examine the  relationship of  the activities described earlier
to the findings and recommendations made by PLUARG.

POLLUTION FROM LAND USE ACTIVITIES

         PLUARG studies identified a  number of diffuse  source  pollutants which
were  either a  present  or  potential   water quality  problem.   These  substances
included phosphorus,   sediment,  PCBs,  organochlorine  pesticides  used  in  the
past,  industrial  organic   compounds,  mercury,  and,  possibly,  heavy metals.
Microorganisms  were  considered a minor problem.   Results made  available  from
recently completed studies have not changed this finding.

         Post-PLUARG tributary monitoring  programs  in Ohio  and  Wisconsin  will
 soon generate additional information on  pollutant  loadings to  the  lakes.   As
 previously mentioned,  the  Ohio program is  already 50 percent  complete.    An
 important  function of  these  sampling  programs  will be  to  provide additional
 information on the percentage  of biologically available  phosphorus associated
 with the  tributary  load.   Recent evidence indicates  that  40  to 50 percent or
 more  of  the  total   phosphorus  contributed  by Great  Lakes  tributaries  is
 unavailable for plant  growth (Sonzogni  et al.,  1980).

          The  Phosphorus   Management  Strategies  'Task  Force  (PMSTF)  has
 highlighted  the  need  for  additional  research on phosphorus availability.   Of
 particular importance are  studies which will  identify  sources of  phosphorus  in
 terms  of  their  relative  bioavailability.    It  is  only  with  such  information
 that those activities having  the moat  substantial  impact on  Great Lakes water
                                        79

-------
 quality can  be  identified  and  targeted  for  diffuse  source  control.    Such
 information  is  essential  for  development of  a  cost-effective  pollution
 abatement  strategy.

 SOURCES OF DIFFUSE POLLUTANTS

         A major  conclusion  of  the  PLUARG  study was that land  factors  such  as
 land  form (e.g.,  soil  texture  and  type, physiography,  etc.),  land use
 intensity  and  materials   usage  must  be  considered  along  with  land  use  in
 determining the relative  magnitude  of pollution to  be  expected  from any  given
 area.   Meteorological  conditions  also need to be  considered in  determining
 those  portions  of a  watershed which  are "hydrologically active".   A great deal
 of  attention  is being  focused on this set  of factors affecting  pollution from
 land.

         The  research  survey highlighted  a  number  of  efforts underway in  the
 basin  which  are  addressing  such  things  as  the   influence  of  soil  type  on
 pollutant  loadings, mitigating  effects of  various  crop  cultivation  practices,
 and  the  effects  of  silvicultural   practices  on  water  quality.     Computer
 modeling  to  describe   pollutant  loading  and  transport  and  the  effects  of
 alternate management strategies  is also receiving considerable attention.

         Additional information from PLUARG1s Menomonee  and Maumee  pilot
 watershed  studies  has contributed   to  our  knowledge  of  fluvial   transport
 mechanisms, the  effectiveness of  various BMPs in controlling erosion,  and  the
 effects of  seasonal  changes  on nutrient and sediment  loading.  These  studies
 have also  underscored  the importance of considering soil characteristics  when
 evaluating the diffuse  source contribution  to be expected  from any given area.

         Results  obtained from  the   technical  studies  conducted   under the
 Washington County 108(a) Demonstration  Project  generally  supported and
 reinforced  the   conclusions  of  PLUARG  (i.e.,   significance   of  construction
 activities  in urbanizing   areas).    It will  be important to  integrate  study
 results concerning  the feasibility  and acceptability  of,  and  water  quality
 improvements  associated with, conservation  tillage  practices with those of the
Honey Creek study and  the  Saginaw Bay ACP  Special  Project as more information

                                       80

-------
becomes  available.    Results  obtained  from  the  Honey  Creek water  quality
monitoring activity will be  of  special  interest  in light of the Demonstration
Project's finding that the highest available phosphorus  losses were  associated
with the no-till sites.

         PLUARG concluded  that  streambank erosion  was  not  a  major  pollutant
 source  to the  lakes,  accounting  for  only about  7 percent of  the  estimated
 total  tributary load.   Initial  results  from the  Cuyahoga River  Restoration
 Study  support  this  finding,  albeit on  a localized  level.  It will  be important
 to  monitor  future  efforts  conducted  under this  study  and  an  additional  study
 proposed  by   the  Corps of  Engineers  to  reduce   sediment transport  to  the
 Lorraine  Harbor.    The study  would  focus   on  Ohio's  Black  River,  closely
 paralleling work conducted under the Cuyahoga River Study.

 MANAGEMENT STRATEGY

          Progress  continues to  be made  toward  development of  a  Great  Lakes
 environmental  management  strategy.     The  IJC  has  completed its  review  of
 PLUARG's  recommendations  and  will  soon be  transmitting  its  comments  to
 governments.    The  PMSTF  will  be  completing  its  work within  the  next  few
 months.    Establishment   of   final  target  loads,  coupled with  the  IJC
 recommendations,   should   provide  a  strong  framework  for development  of  a
 management  strategy.

          As previously discussed, future funding under  the 208 program will be
 primarily directed  toward  prototype  projects  for control  of nonpoint  source
 pollution.     The   study  conducted  by Heidtke  et al.  (1979b)   utilizing  the
 overview modeling  process,  found  that  mechanisms  to  control urban  runoff were
 not  cost-effective  in terms  of  the  reduction  achieved  in  the  annual total
 phosphorus load to the Great Lakes,  but  may significantly reduce  heavy metal
 loadings.   The capability  of  urban  controls for  reducing heavy metal  inputs
 must  be  further   evaluated from the standpoint  of   cost and  the  potential
 benefits  to  be  derived   from  decreased   metal  inputs.   There  is  still
 insufficient  evidence  that metal inputs  are creating  problems  in the  lakes.
 Results of   the  Nationwide  Urban  Runoff Program  should  provide  needed
 information  on the benefits  and cost-effectiveness  of  urban controls.   With

                                        81

-------
 this  additional   information,  the  need  for  further  controls  beyond  those
 recommended by PLUARG can be  ascertained.

          As 208 monies are directed away from point  source  control  and  general
 planning  activities,  state  and  local  governments   should  be  encouraged  to
 provide  additional funding to  maintain the  regional  water quality  management
 programs.   This will  help  ensure  that the solutions  to water  quality  problems
 developed   in  the  management   plans  are  implemented   by  the network of  local
 designated management agencies.  A continuing planning process  is necessary  to
 address  new water  quality problems  as  they  arise.

          State and  regional   five  year  strategies  recommended only  a  small
 number of programs specific to the Great Lakes.   However,  a number  of  studies
 were identified which are of particular  relevance to Great Lakes concerns and
 which  would address  water quality problems utilizing  a systems  approach  (e.g.,
 studies  of atmospheric sources  of pollutants).  A number of these studies will
 likely receive low priority for 208 funding  in  the  immediate  future.   Funding
 from alternate sources should be encouraged.

         PLUARG concluded that  "atmospheric  loads are a  significant source  of
 many pollutants to the  Great  Lakes and  constitute  a potentially controllable
 source."   It  is,  therefore, important  that additional efforts  be made by U.S.
 EPA  and  the states to coordinate air and water quality planning  and  management
 programs.    Inclusion of air  pollution control  programs  in  some state-EPA
 agreements  and state  and  regional  five year  strategies  is an important  first
 step in   achieving  this.    Additional  efforts   are  also  needed   to   expand
 international  cooperation in the area of air  pollution control.

           A number  of  financial  assistance  programs  are now  available   to
 provide  funds  for the  implementation of  nonpoint   source  remedial measures.
 These  include  the  Rural  Clean  Water Program  and  the  Agricultural Conservation
 Program  on a  national  level,  and  the Wisconsin Nonpoint Source Water Pollution
 Abatement  Program  on  a regional level.   Projects  such as  the Washington  County
 Demonstration  Project  and the Lake   Erie  Wastewater Management  Study have
 provided  considerable  technical  information  on BMPs  and  developed  model
management  programs.   The  Washington  Project went  on to  explore  local legal

                                        82

-------
and  institutional   arrangements   for  effecting  nonpoint  source  control  and
public  relations  programs.   PLUARG  recognized  both of  these  as essential
activities.

         Proposed objectives  and  activities  under   the  new  Soil  and Water
Reosurces  Conservation  Program   are  consistant  with  a  number  of PLUARG  s
recommendations,  as previously discussed.   This  developing  program will
provide  an  additional   framework  within  which  to   develop  components  of   a
management strategy.

         PLUARG included  wetland  preservation in  its  recommendations for
development  of  an environmental management  strategy.   An important development
in  this  area  occurred  in January  of   this  year  when  the  Michigan  Wetland
Protection  Act  (Act No.  203)  was  signed  into  law.   The State  Department  of
Natural  Resources,  working  with  the   U.S.   Fish  and  Wildlife  Seryice,   is
proceeding  with an  inventory of  wetland areas.   It  is expected  that,  by  the
end  of  1980, 60 percent  of the  state will be  completed.   Prompt completion  of
the  inventory  is  imperative  in  counties  of 100,000  people  or  less.   Inland
wetlands  in these  areas are generally  not  subject to the requirements  of  the
Act  prior to completion  of  the inventory.

          The following  recommendations were  recently included  in the Great
Lakes  Basin Plan's  water  quality  element.   They effectively  summarize areas
where  emphasis  should  be directed in the coming months in light of  information
currently available.

          1.   Rapid  implementation of the 1 mg/L phosphorus limitation
              (for  sewage treatment plants 1 mgd or greater)  should  be
              encouraged.  Further evaluation  of more  stringent  control
              options should continue to be evaluated via research  and
              demonstration projects.

          2.   Nonpoint  source  control programs  which  emphasize  minimal
              costs  should  be  implemented immediately.

          3.   Additional study  of the significance of  atmospheric
              inputs of toxics  is  necessary.

                                        83

-------
4.  Additional  resources  should be  provided  to  state  and
    regional water  quality planning agencies  to assist  them
    in participating more  fully  in Great Lakes planning.

5.  Major resource  planning and  management  programs (such as
    those  under  the  Clean  Air  and  Water  Acts)  should be
    integrated.

6.  Remedial programs should be  evaluated  on a  comprehensive
    basis to fairly compare  their overall cost-effectiveness
    (e.g.,  urban  runoff   controls  to  reduce  phosphorus or
    metals loadings).
                              84

-------
                                   REFERENCES
Aguglia, D., Project Manager, Cuyahoga River Restoration Study, U.S. Army
    Corps of Engineers, Buffalo District, New York (1980).  Personal
    communication.

Aull, G.H., Loudon, T.L.,  and J.B. Gerrish (1979).  "Cropland, Buffer, and
    Stream:  A Field Study," Paper No. 79-2010.  Joint meeting of American
    Society of Agricultural Engineers and Canadian Society of Agricultural
    Engineering, Winnipeg, Canada.

Baker, D.B., Director, Water Quality Laboratory, Heidelberg College, Tiffin,
    Ohio (1980).  Personal communication.

Chapra,  S.C., and W.C. Sonzogni (1979).  "Great Lakes Total Phosphorus Budget
     for  the Mid  1970s."  JWPCF, 5J_(10),  p. 2524.

Clark, J.,  International Joint Commission, Great Lakes  Regional Office,
    Windsor, Ontario (1976).  Personal communication.

Corbett, E.S., Lynch,  J.A.,  and W.E.  Sopper  (1978).  "Timber Harvesting
     Practices and Water Quality in  the Eastern  United States."  Journal  of
     Forestry, 76(8) .

Crumrine,  J., Honey Creek Project Manager,  and  D.  Wurm, Project
     Conservationist, Honey Creek, Tiffin,  Ohio  (1980).   Personal  communication.

East  Central Michigan  Planning  and  Development  Region  (ECMPDR)  (1980).   "Work
     Plan for EPA Continuing  Planning  Monies."  Saginaw, Michigan, 26 p.

Great Lakes Basin Commission (1979a).   "Water Quality  Recommendations -  As
     Adopted, August,  1979."  Great  Lakes Basin  Commission,  Ann Arbor, Michigan.

 Great Lakes Basin Commission (1979b).   "Great Lakes  Basin Plan,  Water Quality
     Plan and Draft  Environmental  Impact  Statement (90-Day Review Document)."
     Great  Lakes  Basin Commission, Ann Arbor, Michigan,  119  p.

 Hall, J.R., Jarecki,  E.A., Monteith,  T.J., Skimin, W.E., and W.C. Sonzogni
     (1976).  "Existing River Mouth Loading Data in the U.S. Great Lakes
     Basin."  Prepared by  the Great  Lakes Basin Commission staff  for the
     International Joint Commission, Windsor, Ontario,  713 p.

 Heidtke, T.M.,   Sonzogni,  W.C., and T.J.  Monteith (1979a).  "Management
     Information Base and  Overview Modeling:  Update of Projected Loadings to
     the Great  Lakes."  Great Lakes Basin Commission, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 38 p.

 Heidtke, T.M.,   Monteith,  T.J., Sullivan R.A., Scheflow, D.J., Skimin, W.E.,
     and W.C. Sonzogni (1979b).   "Future U.S. Phosphorus Loadings to the Great
     Lakes:  An  Integration of Water Quality Management Planning  Information."
     Great Lakes Basin Commission, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 71 p.


                                         85

-------
Heidtke, T.M., Scheflow,  D.J.,  and  W.C.  Sonzogni (1980).   "U.S.  Heavy Metal
    Loadings to the Great Lakes:   Estimates of Point and  Nonpoint
    Contributions."  Great Lakes  Basin Commission,  Ann Arbor,  Michigan,  34 p.

International Joint Commission Pollution from Land  Use Activities Reference
    Group (PLUARG) (1978).  "Environmental Management Strategy for the Great
    Lakes System."  International Joint Commission, Windsor, Ontario, 173 p.

    (1979a).  "Menomonee River Pilot Watershed Study - Effects of Tributary
    Inputs on Lake Michigan During High Flows, Draft Final Report, Vol.  10."
    International Joint Commission, Windsor, Ontario, 7 p.

    (1979b).  "Menomonee River Pilot Watershed Study - Simulation of Pollutant
    Loadings and Runoff Quality,  Draft Final Report, Vol. 5."  International
    Joint Commission, Windsor, Ontario.

Johnson, M.G., Comeau, J.C., Heidtke, T.M., Sonzogni, W.C., and B.W. Stahlbaum
    (1978).  "Management Information Base and Overview Modelling."  Prepared
    for the International Joint Commission Pollution from Land Use Activities
    Reference Group (PLUARG), International Joint Commission, Windsor,
    Ontario, 90 p.

Joint Water Quality/Science Advisory Boards' Task Force on Phosphorus
    Management Strategies (PMSTF) (1979).  "Interim Report on Several
    Phosphorus Issues."  International Joint Commission, Windsor, Ontario,
    Unpublished, 8 p.

Logan,  T.J.,  and R.C. Stiefel (1979).  "The Maumee River Basin Pilot Watershed
    Study, Volume I:  Watershed Characteristics and Pollutant Loadings."  U.S.
    Environmental Protection Agency, Region V, Great Lakes National Program
    Office, Chicago,  Illinois, 135 p.

Logan,  T.J. (1979).   "The Maumee River Basin Pilot Watershed  Study, Volume  II:
      Sediment, Phosphates,  and Heavy Metal Transport."  U.S.  Environmental
    Protection Agency, Region V, Great Lakes National Program Office, Chicago,
    Illinois,  133 p.

Madison,  F.W., Arts,  J.,  Berkowitz,  S.,  Salmon, E.,  and B. Hagman (1980).
    "The  Washington County  Project:  A Final Report."  Unpublished.

Oglesby,  R.T., and W.R.  Schaffner  (1978).  "Phosphorus Loadings  to Lakes  and
    Some  of Their Responses, Part  2  - Regression Models of  Summer
    Phytoplankton Standing  Crops,  Winter  Total P,  and Transparency of New York
    Lakes with Known  Phosphorus  Loadings."  Limnology and Oceanography, 23(1) .

Schaffner,  W.R.,  and  R.T. Oglesby  (1978).  "Phosphorus Loadings  to Lakes  and
    Some  of Their Responses, Part  1  - A  New  Calculation of  Phosphorus Loading
    and Its Application  to  13 New  York Lakes."  Limnology  and Oceanography,
    23U).

Skimin, W.E.,  Stevenson,  R.W., and W.C.  Sonzogni (1979).   "Post-PLUARG
    Evaluation of Great  Lakes Water  Quality  Management  Studies." Great  Lakes
    Basin Commission, Ann Arbor, Michigan,  129  p.


                                       86

-------
Sonzogni,  W.C.,  Monteith,  T.J.,  Bach,  W.N.,  and V.G.  Hughes (1978).   "United
    States Great Lakes Tributary Loadings."   Prepared for the International
    Joint Comnission, Windsor, Ontario, 187  p.

Thompson, D.B.,  Loudon, T.L., and J.B. Gerrish (1978).  "Winter and Spring
    Runoff from Manure Application Plots."  ASAE Technical Paper No. 78-2032,
    American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St. Joseph, Michigan, 19 p.

U.S. Department of Agriculture (1980).  "Summary of Appraisal, Parts I and II,
    and Program Report - RCA, Review Draft."  Washington, D.C., 35 p.

U.S. Department of Agriculture,  Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation
    Service (1979).  "The Agricultural Conservation Program."  Washington,
    D.C.', 29 p.

U.S. Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers, Buffalo District (1971).
    "Cuyahoga River Basin - Ohio - Restoration Study, First Interim Report."
    Buffalo, New York, 104 p.

    (1977).  "Cuyahoga River Restoration Study - Revised Plan of Study."
    Buffalo, New York, 44 p.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1978).  "1978-1983 Work Plan  for the
    Nationwide Urban Runoff Program."  Washington, D.C., 74 p.

Washtenaw County Soil  Conservation District  and Monroe County Soil
    Conservation District (1979).  "Nonpoint  Source  Control Measures for
    Portions of the Huron and Raisin River  Basins -  The  Saline Valley Project
    - A Proposal."  81 p.

Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (1979).  "The  Lower Manitowoc River
    Priority Watershed Plan."  Madison, Wisconsin, 63 p.

Young, R.A., and C.K.  Mutchler  (1976).  "Pollution Potential  of Manure Spread
    on Frozen Ground."  Journal of Environmental Quality,  5J.2) .

Young, R.A., and R.F.  Holt  (1977).  "Winter-Applied  Manure:   Effects on Annual
    Runoff, Erosion  and Nutrient Movement."   Journal of  Soil  and Water
    Conservation,  32(5).

Young, R.A., Huntrods, T.,  and  W. Anderson  (1980).   "Effectiveness  of
    Vegetated Buffer  Strips  in  Controlling  Pollution."   Accepted  for
    publication in Journal  of Environmental  Quality.
                                        87

-------

-------
                                   APPENDIX A

                     LAKE ERIE WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT STUDY:
                    HONEY CREEK WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PROJECT
         The  following  is  an informal  GLBC staff  summary of  the  Honey Creek
Watershed Management  Seminar/Tour held in  Bucyrus,  Ohio, on  October 22nd and
23rd, 1979.   Data and information were  presented on  the  initial  results  from
several  farms  in  the  area that had  used  the no-till or mulch-till approach to
fanning.  A complete list of attendees  is attached.

INTRODUCTION

         As  part  of  the  U.S.  Army  Corps  of  Engineers'   Lake  Erie  Wastewater
Management  Study,  funds  were made  available  to  examine the  feasibility of
reducing pollution  runoff  from  agricultural land.  To evaluate various  farming
practices  and their  impact  upon  water  quality  as well  as  the  economics of
farming,  a joint board  of  supervisors  was  formed  representing  the Soil  and
Water  Conservation  Districts  of three  counties   in  Ohio.    These counties
contain  a  187-square-mile  watershed   called  Honey  Creek,  tributary  to  the
Sandusky River.   The Corps  of  Engineers  helped finance farmers to plant  crops
using conventional  tillage,  mulch-till and no-till procedures  in  the spring of
1979.

MULCH-TILL

         The  term "mulch-till"  is used to  describe  the practice of maintaining
a  ground cover over a field as long as possible  over the year.   If  a mulch  is
present,  it will protect  the  ground  from  raindrop  impact  and soil movement
during  heavy  rainfalls.    There   is no  other significant  difference  between
mulch-till  and  conventional-till  in  terms of  farming  practices,   machinery
needed  or,  apparently,  costs (although only one  farm  reported costs  for mulch-
till).   There will  still  be times  when the  entire  field  will  be  plowed and
produce  significant  pollution runoff.
                                        89

-------
NO-TILL

         No-till farming differs  significantly  from conventional tillage.   A
comparison of  the  two  practices  shows  that expenditures for  seed,  lime,  and
miscellaneous overhead  are  roughly the  same,  along with dollars  outlaid  for
various  fertilizers.   The  no-till  approach  requires  several  different
chemicals, such  as  a herbicide designed to  burn  off the ground  cover  at  the
time  of  planting.    There  is  no  appreciable  difference  in insecticide
expenditures.   The  machinery  requirements,  and thus  capital  outlay,  interest
payment,  and  depreciation,  vary  significantly.   The no-till approach requires
planter  equipment,  spray  equipment,  and  harvesting equipment,  while  the
conventional-till  requires  a  plow,  tandem  disc,  harogator,  planter,  spray,
cultivator, and  harvesting  equipment.   Conventional-till also  requires  a much
larger tractor to pull the  plows.

         The  cost  per  acre  for  conventional-till   ranges  from  $201/acre  to
$224/acre,  and for  no-till,  from  $183  to $209/acre (see attachments).
Depending  upon  the chemicals  required  or  chemical  availability,  the no-till
operation  is  almost  always  less than  the conventional-till  approach  in terms
of  cost  per  acre (data were  obtained  from  three test  farms  and presented at
the  seminar).    Two  figures  that  were  not presented,  but  came out  in
discussion, were the amount of time required to perform the two  operations and
the  fuel  consumption  difference  between  the  two  procedures.    One  farmer
reported that it took  him  six  hours  and 20  minutes  (not including  harvesting)
for  a  15-acre   plot  in no-till,  and  34  hours  for  the  same  size  plot  in
conventional-till.   The no-till  accomplished  about  the same yield  (harvesting
had  not  yet  occurred,  although standing crops  looked very  similar  for both
practices)  for just  under  20  percent  of  the  time  needed  to  perform
conventional-till operations.   For 15 acres of no-till  planting,  15 gallons of
fuel  oil  were needed.  For 15  acres of conventional  planting,  99  gallons of
fuel  oil  were needed.  This  was  primarily  due to  the number of extra passes
the  tractor must make  and  the  horsepower required  to pull  a conventional plow
through the soil.
                                       90

-------
         The no-till  planter  performs  several  operations in  one.    It has  a
disc or chisel  device  that  separates a ridge down  the  field  approximately two
to three  inches  wide  and several inches deep.   This  disc is then  followed by
fertilizer, seed  application,  and  usually  a herbicide  to burn off  the  cover
that may be competing with the new  seedlings  (cover is  replanted  in the fall).
No  other  soil  is disturbed other  than the  small  opening needed to  plant the
seed.   The  burned  cover acts  as  a  mulch  over  the  summer.    Conventional
operations  turn  over all of  the soil  to  much  greater depths, and  pass  with
discs and harogators to smooth out the  soil before the planter inserts seed.

         An interesting  fact  was brought  up  concerning  the  planters.  Some of
the  farmers in  the  area  have  a planter that could now  be  used  for  the no-till
operation.   Some equipment manufacturers  have  begun  to  make  no-till planters
available  by  modifying  existing planters.   A no-till  planter  can be  used in
both  no-till  and conventional-till  practices,  while  the conventional planter
can  only  be  used  under conventional  settings.    As  a  result,  to  gain
flexibility  for  future  development, a  number of  farmers have bought a no-till
planter,  although they had not used  it  in no-till before.

         Because  of the  large  difference  in equipment  requirements,  both in
size  and  in  number  of  pieces, equipment  manufacturers  have been  somewhat
reluctant  to  promote this  form  of  farming.  A  no-till farmer  would no longer
need  a  huge $80,000 four-wheel-drive tractor to perform his plowing  operation;
nor  would  he  need  a  number   of the  additional  implements  that are used  for
grooming  the  fields.   On the  other  hand,  chemical manufacturers and  fertilizer
producers  have  been most  helpful  in  developing  no-till  farming.   More
chemicals  are  required to promote the  no-till approach.

          It  is possible  that  no-till  farming could  be promoted on  energy  and
time  savings.    With  the tremendous  rise  in fuel  oil  and  gasoline  prices,  a
considerable  savings can be   realized  using lighter tractors  and  fewer  runs
across  a  field.   As mentioned  earlier, an 85 percent fuel savings was  realized
between two test plots.   Additionally, because of  the  tremendous time  savings,
a fanner can  have  time   to crop more  land  or  to  diversify  into  livestock or
other  farm-related  business.
                                        91

-------
          The farmers who participated  in  the program were very  optimistic  and
 encouraged  about  the  no-till  approach.    A number  of  their  neighbors  were
 somewhat  skeptical.   It was interesting to  note  that,  as  the crop came  up  and
 the  time  and  money  savings  were  documented,  a  number of  the neighboring
 farmers  were won over to the  program  and  are interested  in  participating  next
 year.   A  program  such  as  this may significantly  improve  water quality  without
 issuance   of  stringent  water  quality  regulations  or  laws  designed  to  direct
 farming  activities because  of  the  economic  benefits that a farmer can grasp.

         Productivity tests had not  yet  been  completed  at  the  time  of  the
 tour.   However,  it appeared that crop emergence  and the health of the crop  was
 virtually  identical  between the  conventional field and  the no-till field.

 IMPLICATIONS  FOR WATER QUALITY

         Heidelberg  College (Tiffin, Ohio), along with the Corps  of  Engineers,
 has   set   up  sampling  stations  in  Honey  Creek  watershed.    They will   be
 attempting to document  change over years  in sediment, phosphorus,  and other
 parameter  concentrations and  loads due to no-till  approaches.    Because  of
 limited  funding,  they  were   not  able  to  significantly   sample  conventional
 fields  before they  went to   no-till.   Because  of  the   wide  fluctuations  in
 rainfall,  the loading data  have  been extremely erratic  and do not  allow  for  an
 interpretation of  the effect  of no-till  farming.  Some  general  observations
 were  offered.  From  May  through October, 1979, a  record 32  inches of rainfall
 fell on the  Honey  Creek  watershed.   A  survey of two fields side by side — one
 no-till, one  conventional-till  —  showed   that  significant   soil  movement  and
 loss occurred in the  conventional-till  field relative  to  the no-till.  This  is
 particularly noticeable on  sloping fields in the area.

         It  may be   difficult  to  produce numbers   for some   time  on  the
 improvement in water  quality due to no-till  farming.   The  participants in this
 program feel  very  strongly that more  time  and much  more  money  should  be  put
 into this  project  or similar  projects  to do a proper analysis of the effects
of no-till  farming  on water  quality and on the long-term effects on soil.
                                       92

-------
         The  biggest questions facing farmers at this time are:

         - What will happen to the soil after 10 or 20 years of no-till?
         - What will happen after repeated herbicide applications?
         - How will the soil behave without being turned over  after a  long
           time?
         - What will cover crops do to the soil over time?

These and other questions can only be answered by future research.
                                        93

-------
                  HONEY CREEK WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PROJECT

                            Seminar Participants
Adams, John, COE, Chemist,  17?6 Niagara St<» B-.'Jfalo, N.Y. 14127
Angelo, C. G,, Geological Survey, Water Rer.rv.,^ss Oiv., 975 West Third Ave.
               Columbus, Ohio  43212
Baker, David, Heidelberg College, Tiffin, Ohio  .''4833
Baltes, Gene, B.C., S.C.S., 155 E, Perry Ctr'.-et, Tiffin, Ohio  44883
Bishop, Dolloff F., 6995 Goldengate D.rire, Cincinnati, Ohio 45244
Bernard, Charles, 6801 S. SR 231, Tiffin, Ohio  44333  (ASCS - Seneca Co.)
Bone, Samuel, 1885 Neil Ave., Dept. of Agronomy, OSU, Columbus, Ohio 43210
Burns, Dennie, SCS, Director, Office of Hater Duality, Washington, D.C.
Clark, John, Ohio State ASCS, USDA, Columbus,  Ohio  43215
Crumrine, John, Honey Creek Project Mgr., 155 E. Perry St., Tiffin, OH 44883
Davis, Steve, SCS, AI, 219  W. Northern Ave,, Lima, Ohio  45801
DeGrand, M. J», Geological  Survey, Hater Resources Div., 975 W. Third Ave,,Cols,,
Fleischer, Fred C., Ontario Ministry of Environment, Water Resources Branch,
               135 St, Glair Ave. W, Toronto Ontario M4V195
Drynan, W, R., 100 Ouellette Ave., Windsor Ontario Canada  N9J  1C9
Forster, D, Lynn, Dept. of Agricultural Economics, OSU, Columbus, Ohio 43210
Foster, James H., Ohio Dept. of Agriculture, 65 Front St., Columbus, Ohio 43215
Fuller, Kent, EPA, 230 South Dearborn, CVticago, Illinois 60604
Gist, George R,, 2120 Fyffe Road, Columbus, Ohio  43210
Haddan, William J., P. 0. Bos 2, Danville, Ohio 43014, (Chevron Chemical)
Hale, Phil, Long Point Region Conservation Authority, Simcoe Ontario
Haskett, Tom, Gen. Supt,, Long Point Region Conservation Authority, Route 1,
               Vittoria, Canada
Hastings, Charles L,, Fremont Area Extension Center, 1401 Walter Ave,
               Fremont, Ohio  43420
Heft, Floyd, ODNR, Fountain Square, Columbus, Ohio  43214
Hooker, John E», D.C., SCS, Medina, Ohio
Iliffe, Frank J., Ministry of the Environment, Queen's Park, Toronot, Ontario
Kile, SCS, Columbus, Ohio
King, Arnold, SCS, Washington, D.C.
KLeman, Bill, Extension Service, Court House, Bucyrus, Ohio  44820
Kline, Phillip A., Heidelberg College, Tiffin, Ohio  44883
Krieger, Dr, Kenneth A., Research Associate, Water Quality Laboratory,
               Heidelberg College, Tiffin, Ohio  44883
Krueger, Charles R,, OARDC, Wooster, Ohio
Lake, Jim, NACD, Program Specialist, Route 1, Woodburn, Ind,
Logan, John D., Ohio State ASCS, USDA, Columbus, Ohio  43215
Logan, Terry J., Agronomy Dept., OSU, Columbus, Ohio
MacMuilen, Michael, EPA, Chicago, Illinois
McClusky, Jim, SCS, AI, Route 2, Box 11, 66N, Defiance, Ohio  43512
McCormack, Donald, SCS, Director, Soil Survey Interpretations Division,
               Washington, D.C.
Manz, William L., Ohio EPA/OPC, Box 1049, 361 E. Broad St., Columbus, OH 43216
Monteith, Timothy, Great Lakes Basin Commission, 3475 Plymouth Road, P.O.
               Box 944, Ann Arbor, MI  48106
Moon, Robert W,, Ohio State ASCS, USDA, Columbus, Ohio  43215
Noonan, Kenneth, SCS, P, 0, Box 549, Clarion, PA 16214
Pow, John, Long Point Region Conservation Authority, Route 3,  Simcoe, Ontario
Reinhart, Floyd, ASCS County Exec. Dir,, 4950 Marion Melmore Rd., Sycamore, OH
Sallee, William J., Chief, Env. Activities Br., Cons, & Envir, Protection
               Division, ASCS, Washington, D.C.
Savory, Frank, Long Point Region Cons. Authority, Timcoe, Ontario
Schindler, Ray, Area Extension Service, 1401 Walter Ave,, Franont, OH 43420
                                  94

-------
           HONE* CREEK WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PROJECT   (con't)

                        Seminar Parti cap
Schmidt, Berlie L., Dept. of Aaraeny, U.-U.  1*33 Neil Ave.,  Columbus, OH 43210
Schmidt, John V., As at. Extension Editor.  '^1-: -bJcn, Cooperative Extension
               Servi.ce, 2120 i'y?f> Hca-j, C^-rouc,  Ohio  43210
Schultz, Thomas J., 7KACCG, Suite 725, A-"' 'n.=.o:l»oa  Ave.,  Toledo,  Ohio 43604
Smith, Bill E., 10685 E TP. 10o, AtLicr*. Ciiio 44^7  (Seneca SHOD)
Smith, Robert U., D.C., SCS, Crawford Corjay,  aicj-na,  Ohio  44820
Smith, Robert E,, Jr., BttlS Court >cuse .;.-. ;-'9d.  Bldg.,  100  S. Clinton St.,
               Roon 771, Syracuse, N/f. "0260
Stamatel, Henry 3-, US Courthouse &  Fed. BJ.dg.,  100 S.  Clinton St., Room
               77If Syracuse, N.Y. 15^60
Stem, George, Resource Conservationist, SCS, Medina,  Ohio
Tootle, Dick, Ohio Stats ASCS, UoDA, Colxir/oas,  Ohio  43215
Urban, Don, SCS, SPA, Cbicft/p, Uiinois 60172
Wager, Jerry, Ohio EPA. 36! a. Brcid Sti(  Columbus, Ohio  A'2l6
Wallace, Dave, Ohio State ASCS, 'JSDA., Colvrob'is,  Ohio  ^3215
Weaver, Willis, Long Point Region Ccnservaoion Author5.ty, Simcoe, Ontario
VJelsh, Gerald B., SCS, Wa.«hii-.«?ton, D»C. 20013
Wilson, Carl, EPA, Chicago, ILtinoio
Wittmann, Warren L., CourAy B".'.d.^c #:., 3^37 W. Main  Rd., Batavia N.Y. 14020
Wurm, Dave, Project Consarvaiiocist, Honey Creek,  155 E.  Perry St., Tiffin, OH
Yaksich, Steve, Corps of Engineers,  1776 Niagara St., Buffalo, Nex^r York, 14207
Young, Paul, 2979 Lakewood Av-., Iaaa.y Ohio  45B05
Zech, Mike, 7870 Olentangy liiver Rd., Uorthington,  Ohio  (Chevron Chemical Co.)
                                   95

-------
                                          STOP #1
                                  Honey Creek Seminar-Tour
                                    October 22,  23,  1979
Bill Smith  (no-till)

Seed, lime, misc.
Fertilizer: 30-18-13  (blend)
            9-27-3+2
Chemicals:  1 qt. Paraquat  2  CL
            X-77 Spreader 302/ac
            1-5 qt. Aatrex  4L
            2-5 qt. Bladex  4L
Insecticide:  Diazinon ssed treater
              15iP Furadon   106
     TOTAL VARIABLE COSTS
                                      $40.00
                                       66.00
                                        9.36
                                       10.00
                                         .30
                                        4.31
                                        8.16
                                         .50
                                       11.25

                                     $149.88
 Bill Smith (conventional)

 Seed, lime,  misc.                   $40.00
 Fertilizer:   Broad  same            66.00
              Starter  sane           9.36
 Chemicals:    3.3 pt Dual 6E         10.93
              2.5 qt. Bladex 4L       8.16
 Insecticide:   Diazinon seed tre.       .50
               10i?  Furadon 106 w/plane
                                     11.00
     TOTAL VARIABLE  COSTS         $145.95
Machinery
           (custom  rates)
            Plant
            Harvest
            Spray  1
            Spread fertilizer
                                      10.00
                                      18.00
                                       3.00
                                       2.50
     TOTAL MACHINERY

TOTAL COSTS

Time:
   1 hr. 40 min. fertilize
   3 hr. 40 min. plant
   1 hr. 00 min. spray
TOTAL
   6 hr. 20 min. for 15 ac.
   /J 5«.l  fuel    •£•«/- IS" nt.
Machinery  (custom  rates)
             Plant                    7,00
             Harvest                 18.00
             Spray   1                 3.00
             Spread  fertilizer  1     2.50
             Plow                    10.00
             Hardgator w/packer       4.50
             Disc w/packer            4.00
             Rotary hoe               2.50
             Cultivate                4.00
     TOTAL MACHINERY                $55.50

TOTAL COSTS                       $201.45

Time:
   32 hr. 00 min. plo , till, plant,  etc.
    2 hr. 00 min. spr 7 Furadan
                                                 TOTAL
                                                    34 hours for 15 ac.
                                                    
-------
                      PAUL PRICE
         TILLAGE SYSTEMS ECONOMIC COMPARISONS
     Expense Items
-'	Per Acre Costs	
 No Till   Mulch Till  Convent.
                         Till
Seed, Lime, Misc.;
 (Soil Test, Phones/etc.)
     40.00
                                                      40.00
Fertilizer;
            N   P   IL
           223 196 139

 Start 240* 9 - 27 - 3+2s     21.60
 Broadcast 600# 7-26-26   48.00
 W/ Herb.  (53gal.) 28-0-0 31.42
   Sub Total:                101.02
Chemicals;
 2 qt. Roundup 4 EC
 2 qt. Bladex  4L
 2 qt. Attrex  4L
     29.00I/
      7.50
      6.50
                            21.60
                            48.00
                            31.42
                           101.02
                                                       7.50
                                                       6.50
Insecticides;
 Isotox "F" Seed Treater
 14# Furadan 10E

Total Variable Costs:
Machinery (Custom Rates)
 Plow
 Tandem Disk
 Harogator
 Plant
 Spray, Spread Fert.
 Cultivate
 Harvest

Total :
     10.00
      8.00

     18.00
     36.00
   $232.47
    Conv.
    No-Till (w/ Roundup)
    223.97
  -  232.47
                                        (  ''                223.97
                                        '                            M
                                         ^N.T. w/ Paraquat - 209.47   *
                                                             14,SO< }
                                                                 ConV
I/ - Roundup used to control quackgrass.  Would          __
     1 qt. of Paraquat instead.   (Paraquat costs normally
     $6.00, this would be $23.00 less.)
2/ - Using No Till with paraquat instead of Roundup would be
     $14.50 cheaper than conventional.
                                 97

-------
                     DON PHENICIE

         TILLAGE SYSTEMS ECONOMIC COMPARISONS
      Expense Items
	 Per  Acre  Costs 	
 No Till   Mulch Till  Convent.
                         Till
 Seed, Lime, Misc.
    (soil test.phones/etc.)
     4QOO
4QOO
                            4QOO
 Fertilizer;
            200# 0-44-0
            joo* 0-0-60
  Starter   225* 14-21-9
  w/Herb.  (65gal:) 28-0-0
 Chemicals;
  2 qt. Roundup 4 EC*

  2.5 qt. Bladex 4L

  2 qt. Attrex 4L
   Post Apply - 3oz.-3anvel
     3300
     15.75
     39.27

     87.02
                                          87.02
                            87.02
     29.00-Mlpt.Para)
                  6.00        	
      8.13(3.3pt.Dual)
                10.93(2qt.)  8.13
      5.50        5.50        5.50
      4.16      	        4.16
                               46.79
                                           22.43
                           17.79
 Insecticides:
  Diazinon
  14# Furadan
   4# Sevin
 Total Variable Costs;
1.25 1.25
11.20 11.20
5.40
1.25
11.20

                              186.26
                                          167.30
                           157.00
Macninerv (Custom Rates) :
Plow
Tandem Disk
Cultimulcher
Plant
Spray, Spread Pert.
Cultivate
Harvest

Total Costs
l/_- _Rgundup used to con-crol



(1-F;
_ ___
10.00
11.00


la.oo
39.00
$225.26
Quackgrass



i n ns\
111)4.00 (2) 8.00
	
10.00
8.00


18.00
40.00
$207.30
- normally
4.00
7.00
8.00
3.50
18.00
58.50
$215.76
use 1 qt.
               215.76                     215.76
^N.T.  w/Para.   207.26 vN.T.  w/ Roundup    225.26
                 8.50rconv;                  9.50>Co
     Conv.

     N.T. w/ Roundup
        6                 215.76
   225.26     M.T.  w/ Para207.30
     9.50>Conv.              8.46
-------
                                  APPENDIX B

                     SECTION  108(a) DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS:
                   THE  WASHINGTON COUNTY, WISCONSIN, PROJECT
         Washington  County  is   located  in  southeastern  Wisconsin,  just
northwest of  Milwaukee.   Farmland  currently accounts  for 60  percent  of the
land  area,  but  is  under  intense  urbanizing  pressure  from  the  nearby
metropolitan  area.   Washington County  was  selected as  an  excellent location
for  developing  rural  and  urban  sediment  control programs transferrable  to
similar developing areas  in the basin.

         The  project  was  composed  of  three  ongoing  studies:     legal  and
institutional arrangements,  technical  study, and  development  of  an education
and information program.   Summaries  of  their final  reports are  presented below.

LEGAL AND INSTITUTIONAL UNIT

         The  goal of this unit was  to design and implement programs  to  control
pollution  caused  by  sedimentation.   The  project  was  designed  to  determine
whether  local  governments  would  be  likely  to  enact  and  implement  sediment
control  programs   given  both  technical  and   financial  support.    The
effectiveness of  such programs was also studied.

         Programs were  designed  to  control  the  two major sources of  sediment
in the county:    construction  site  erosion  and erosion  from cropland.   Their
development  followed these general guidelines:

         1.   Programs must be  developed with the advice and  consent of
              local officials  who  would eventually  be  responsible for
              their implementation.

         2.   Ordinances  should be easy  to understand and administer.

         3.   Regulation  should only be imposed to control  excessive
              sedimentation.

                                        99

-------
          4.   Programs   should  be  developed  which  could   readily  be
              adopted  by  local  governments  lacking  the  financial  and
              technical  support which makes  this project unique.

          5.   Programs  must be within  the  scope  of  existing  enabling
              legislation.

          Project  personnel  reviewed  local  sediment  control  and  zoning
 ordinances  and  recommended modifications.   New ordinances were also drafted.
 Their  effort  was  only  partially successful.   For  example,  the county board
 enacted  a construction  site  erosion control ordinance, but  was unwilling  to
 proceed  with  an ordinance for rural erosion  control.   The  experience suggests
 that  local  governments  will enact  sediment  control  regulations  only  in limited
 circumstances.

          The   construction   site  ordinance  required   little   additional
 administrative  expense,  added  a  small  cost  to developers and home buyers,  and
 would  have  successfuly controlled  erosion.  Conversely,  the   rural  ordinance
 was  perceived  as imposing an  additional cost on the county as  well  as  on  some
 farmers,  requiring  them to operate  at  a competitive disadvantage with  farmers
 from other  parts of the state.   Local officials did not perceive a  benefit  to
 match  this  extra cost.    Researchers  felt  that this  experience indicated  the
 need for minimum statewide standards to regulate erosion from farmland.

         The  researchers  also  investigated  the  roles of  the  various  agencies
 with  responsibility  for  programs   dealing  with  sediment  control.    To
 effectively coordinate  programs in the county, the authority for and  resources
 available to  the agenices needed  to be  defined  and,   in  some  instances,  new
 interagency  relationships  designed.    A common  situation  emerged.    Although
 several  agencies  were  involved  in programs  clearly related  to  sediment
 control,   the  goal  of  improvement  of water  quality was not  actively pursued.
 State  and federal  agencies  generally   held responsibility for  water quality
 protection,  with responsibility for land use  control held  at  the local  level.
The  researchers  emphasized that,  in  the  future, effective sediment control
programs   for  improvement  of  water  quality  will  require  that  these separate
 functions be  united  in some manner.
                                      100

-------
         At  the  conclusion of  their  review,  project  personnel were  able to
develop an  institutional  arrangement  considered to be  the  most desirable  for
achieving  sediment control  goals.   The  following  requirements  were viewed as
necessary for effective administration of a  sediment control  program:

         1.  Recognition  that  local  personnel,  familiar  with   local
             social  and  physical   conditions,  are  the  key to  the
             success  of either  a voluntary  or  a regulatory  program.
             Funding  for  local technical  and  administrative  personnel
             should receive high  priority.

         2.  The  state  should provide  financial  assistance to  local
             agencies  for  the manpower   necessary  to  implement   their
             program.

         3.  Training   programs  are  necessary  for   local  agency
             personnel unfamiliar  with  methods for  controlling
             sediment pollution problems.

         4.  Ongoing conservation  programs  should  be  instigated
             statewide.   Short-term  programs  to control  pollution  in
             priority areas are not the  final solution to a  long-term
             problem.

         5.  Local personnel must be sensitive to the concerns of  the
             farmer  and  developer   if they  hope to convince them  to
             adopt alternative management practices.

         Consistent  with  PLUARG's   recommendations, the   researchers advocated
focusing institutional  resources on "critical areas"  first.   In  this manner,
the maximum  improvement in  water quality will be obtained  for each  investment
dollar.   Land  use  and  water quality  data, as  well   as public  input,   were
recognized  as essential information for  identifying "critical  areas".
                                       101

-------
 TECHNICAL UNIT
          The primary  goal  of  this  portion  of  the  study  was  "to  demonstrate  the
 relationship of  certain  land  uses to water pollution and - in specific  areas -
 to determine the  effectiveness  of  several  sediment  and erosion  control
 techniques  for improving water quality."  Major objectives were  as  follows:

          1.   "To measure the  amount of water and the concentrations of
              sediment and  associated pollutants in surface runoff  from
              agricultural  and  urbanizing  areas,  and  to  compute
              pollutant loadings.

          2.   To  identify those characteristics of different  land  uses
              and  management  practices  that  contribute  to  sediment-
              related water pollution problems.

          3.   To  investigate  the effectiveness  of erosion control
             measures in reducing runoff and  pollutant discharges  from
              specific  agricultural  sources  —  particularly cropped
              fields and  barnyards  —  by  using a "before  and  after"
             treatment approach.

         4.  To  examine  methods   for  reducing soil   erosion  and
             sedimentation  from housing construction in a residential
             subdivision."

         The researchers collected  and  analyzed data for  two years from eight
monitoring stations established in  the agricultural  and  developing residential
watersheds in Washington County.   Relationships between  precipitation,  runoff,
land use  and water quality were  studied.   A  series  of  farm best management
practices were  implemented  and  their  effectiveness  and  acceptability
evaluated.    Methods  of  erosion  control   at   construction  sites  were  also
evaluated.  Study findings  included  the  following:
                                      102

-------
1.  "Well-managed  croplands  on dairy farms showed relatively
    low losses.  Contour  strip-cropping proved to be a highly
    effective  sediment  and nutrient control  practice  on
    steep-sloped  croplands.  The  water  quality   benefits  of
    grass  waterways  and  subsurface  drainage  systems  in
    relatively flat watersheds, however, were questionable."

    (This conclusion differs  from  studies  in the Maumee basin
    in  northwestern  Ohio,  where  these measures on  flat
    watersheds were judged to be benefical to water quality.)

2.   "Unmanaged barnyards  were  the  largest  contributors  of
    pollutant  loads  in  the  dairy farming watersheds.   The
    experimental management system installed  in one watershed
    demonstrated that effective management is possible.

3.  Sediment  carried  most  of  the  phosphorus  and nitrogen
    measured  in  runoff  from rural  and  urbanizing  sites.
    However,  land  management  practices  could   successfully
    reduce  loads of sediment and  their associated pollutants,
    although dissolved loads were  often increased.

4.  Excessive  sedimentation  and other  water  quality  problems
    associated with intensive  housing construction were
    documented.     Pollutant  concentrations   and  loads
    diminished  as  the  monitored  subdivisions   stabilized.
    Erosion control  alternatives  were   identified  but   the
    effectiveness  of  the  control  measures  were   not
     successfully demonstrated during the most critical phases
    of development.

 5.  The feasibility  and  acceptability of conservation tillage
     practices  were  evaluated  in  detail.    "No-tillage"  has
    been poorly received in Wisconsin.   On  research  plots in
     Washington County,  technical  limitations  were  observed
     with  the  "no-tillage"  system.  Other  reduced  tillage

                              103

-------
              systems,  in  particular  chisel-plow  systems,  showed
              greater  promise.   Water  quality  improvements are possible
              but dependent  on how  the  previous  year's residue  was
              managed.    Yield reductions  were   small,   and  most
              importantly,  farmers  expressed  more  interest   in  these
              systems  because of their labor and soil saving features.

          6.   Models   and   predictive   methods   addressing   many
              agricultural  aspects  of  sediment  and  related water
              quality  problems  were  developed  and  applied.    These
              included:   (a) a  series of  computer  programs  to predict
              watershed  sediment   yield  using  the  USLE;   (b)   an
              optimization  model that  predicts  farm-level impacts  of
              alternative  sediment  control policies;  (c)  a  hydrologic
              model  for  predicting watershed  soil  losses on  an  event
              basis;  (d)   a  multiple-regression model  for  predicting
              annual soluble phosphorus losses from cropped fields;  and
              (e) a methodology  for  predicting  total  phosphorus  losses
              from confined livestock and winter-spread manure."

         The  study of conservation  tillage systems is  particularly  interesting
 in  light  of  current work  in  the  Honey  Creek watershed  under  LEWMS.    The
 systems  evaluated in  the  Washington County Project were:  conventional  tillage
 (moldboard  plowed  and disked   prior  to  planting),  chisel  plow  (soil chisel
 plowed only  prior  to planting), and  no-till  (no  tillage  operations prior  to
 planting).  Effects  of  applying manure  prior  to  tillage operations were also
 studied with  reference to sediment  and nutrient  losses.

         Results indicated  that  the  manured,  no-till  plots had  the lowest
 sediment  and  total  phosphorus losses.   However, a significant finding was that
 the highest  available phosphorus  losses  were  from the  no-till  sites.   Grain
yields  at no-till sites were significantly  lower;  however,  it was  not
determined whether  the difference  in yield was due to the effect of  tillage on
yield  or  an effect  on population.    In  contrast,  preliminary  findings at Honey
Creek  indicate more  favorable yields from  no-till operations.
                                      104

-------
         Large or consistent differences were not observed in runoff,  sediment
or  phosphorus  losses  between  the chisel  and  conventional  plow  methods.
However, it was  noted  that  several factors  may  have  masked differences which
would  ordinarily have  occurred.   Chisel  plowed  sites were  found  to have
somewhat lesser crop yields  than conventionally  tilled  sites.

         A survey was conducted  of 50  farmers who had participated in a cost-
sharing  program  for  conservation  tillage   in  Dane County,  Wisconsin.   The
purpose  of  the  survey  was  to assess  farmers'  experiences  with and  attitudes
toward  conservation tillage  systems.    Results  indicated  that  farmers were
generally  pleased with conservation  tillage,  but  somewhat  dissatisfied with
the  no-till  method.    Most   farmers  did  not  experience   significant  yield
reductions  from  conservation tillage  as compared  to  conventional   tillage.
Forty  percent of  those  surveyed  experienced  a significant yield  reduction with
no-till  (however,  this  may  have  been  attributable  to  severe  drought
conditions).  Generally, the  farmers felt that  conservation  tillage saved time
and  soil.   Forty percent  felt there was no  financial  saving over  conventional
tillage.  It was  noted  that an average  reduction  of only one tillage  operation
(compared  to  conventional  tillage) was achieved with  the conservation methods
employed by those interviewed.   Further  reduction  is possible  and  would  result
in  larger time,  soil, and money savings.

EDUCATION AND INFORMATION PROGRAM

         The goal of this phase  of the Washington County Project  was  "to have
a  diverse  group of  target  audiences  made aware  of  the magnitude  of  and
alternative solutions  to  the  sediment  problem in  rural  and  urbanizing areas."
The  program  was  divided   into   informational  and  interactional  activities.
Informational  strategies  included the  publication  of  brochures  describing
nonpoint  source  problems and  the project in  general;  displays for  state  and
county  fairs;  a  slide  program and  short   film;   press  releases,  etc.
Interactional  activities  included  numerous  presentations  before various
community  groups, public  participation meetings,  workshops, etc.   Results  of
the  educational  and information program were  generally very  satisfactory.
                                       105

-------

-------
                                   APPENDIX C
                        GLBC 208  BIBLIOGRAPHY  RETRIEVAL
         The following  is  a sample  of a  retrieval  made from  the  GLBC  "208"

Bibliography discussed  in  Chapter IV.   As  previously  mentioned,  only a  very

limited  number  of  entries  have  been made  into  the   system  thus  far.    The

keywords chosen  for  this  example were  nonpoint  sources:  "remedial  measures"

(key word  #220),  "unit area  loads/models"  (key  word   #240)  and "costs"  (key
word #260) .    The search  included  reports  from  every 208  agency  for  which

information has been  entered.   The  format  selected  for this  sample  retrieval
included  specification  of  the  208  agency  acronym, state of  location,

applicable lake basin(s) and the title and date of the   report.
    STATE: Minnesota
    LAKE(S): Superior
    208 AGENCY: MPCA

         Forestry. Package 1. August, 1979,
    STATE: Minnesota
    LAKE(S): Superior
    208 AGENCY: MPCA

         Preliminary Identification of Literature Models and Data for
         Evaluating Rural Nonpoint Nutrient, Sediment and Pathogen Sources
         May,  1977.
     STATE: Minnesota
     LAKE(S):  Superior
     208 AGENCY: MPCA

          Construction Activities. Package  1. August, 1978.
     STATE: Minnesota
     LAKE(S):  Superior
     208 AGENCY: MPCA

         Highway  De-icing  Chemicals. Package  1, Supplement. June, 1978.
                                        107

-------
 STATE:  Minnesota
 LAKE(S):  Superior
 208 AGENCY:  MPCA

      Highway De-icing Chemicals.  Package 2.  May,  1978.


 STATE:  Minnesota
 LAKE(S):  Superior
 208 AGENCY:  MPCA

      Roadside Erosion.  Package  2,  Supplement to:  Description of
      Existing Institutions  and  Programs  Related  to  Water  Quality
      Management  Planning  Study  Topics.   January,  1979.


 STATE:  Wisconsin
 LAKE(S):  Michigan
 208 AGENCY:  WDNR

      Upper Fox River  Basin  Water Quality Management Plan.  Appendix  D:
      Nonpoint  Source  Information.   1977.
STATE: Wisconsin
LAKE(S): Michigan
208 AGENCY:  FVWQPA

     Report  No. 5:   Instream Alteration Study.  October,  1977.


STATE: Wisconsin
LAKE(S): Michigan
208 AGENCY:  SEWRPC

     Technical Report No. 18:  State of the Art of Water Pollution
     Control in Southeastern Wisconsin.  Volume 4:  Rural Stormwater
     Runoff.  December, 1976.
STATE: Illinois
LAKE(S): Michigan
208 AGENCY: NIPC

     Areawide Water Quality Management Plan Part I Chapters 1-10
     June, 1978.
STATE: Illinois
LAKE(S):  Michigan
208 AGENCY: NIPC

     Areawide Water Quality Management Plan, Summary.  (Adopted by
     Northeastern Illinois Planning Commission, January 4  1979)
     March, 1979.
                                   108

-------
STATE:  Indiana
LAKE(S):  Michigan
208 AGENCY: MACOG

     Plate Book.  1978.
STATE: Michigan
LAKE(S): Huron
208 AGENCY: ECMPDR

     Development of Management Alternatives:  Control of Pollution from
     Individual Waste Treatment Systems (Preliminary Draft).  July,
     1977.
 STATE: Michigan
 LAKE(S):  Huron
 208 AGENCY: ECMPDR

      Alternative  Structural  and  Non-Structural Tactics  (Preliminary
      Draft).  Region  VII  Areawide  Waste  Treatment Management  Study.
      September,  1977.
 STATE:  Michigan
 LAKE(S):  Huron
 208 AGENCY:  ECMPDR

      Alternative Structural and Non-Structural  Plans and Their
      Consequences (Preliminary Draft).   Region  VII Areawide Waste
      Treatment Management Study.  March, 1978.
 STATE:  Michigan
 LAKE(S):  Huron Erie
 208 AGENCY: GLS-V

      Urban Nonpoint Source Pollution in GLS Region V - A Background
      Report (First Draft).  February, 1978.
 STATE: Michigan
 LAKE(S): Huron Erie
 208 AGENCY: GLS-V

      208 Areawide Water Quality Plan.  Volume I - Plan Summary (Draft)
      May, 1978 (Revised, August, 1978).
                                    109

-------
STATE: Michigan
LAKE(S): Huron Erie
208 AGENCY: GLS-V

     Urban Nonpoint Source Pollution in GLS Region V - A Background
     Report (Draft).  April, 1978.
STATE: Michigan
LAKE(S): Huron Erie
208 AGENCY: GLS-V

     Agricultural Nonpoint Source Pollution in GLS Region V - A
     Background Report (Draft).  April, 1978.
STATE: Michigan
LAKE(S): Huron Erie
208 AGENCY: GLS-V

     The Impact of Unsewered Development on Water Quality in Region V
     (Draft).  May, 1978.
STATE: Michigan
LAKE(S): Huron
208 AGENCY: NEMCOG

     Appendices 1-9:  Working Papers of the Clean Water Program.  1978,


STATE: Michigan
LAKE(S): Michigan Huron
208 AGENCY: NMRPDC

     Working Papers .


STATE: Michigan
LAKE(S): Michigan Huron
208 AGENCY: Reg II

     Selected 208 Plan.  December, 1977 (Revised, April, 1978).


STATE: Michigan
LAKE(S): Michigan Erie
208 AGENCY: Reg II

     Nonpoint Source Inventory (Draft).  March, 1977.
                                   110

-------
STATE: Michigan
LAKE(S): Michigan Erie
208 AGENCY: Reg II

     Relationships Between Regional Activities and Water Quality
     Conditions (Preliminary Draft).  May, 1977.
                                    Ill

-------

-------
                                  APPENDIX D

                        1977-1978 RIVER MOUTH LOADINGS
         The  following are  the  results  of the  loading  calculations described
in  Chapter  3.    Information  given  is  for  water years  1977 and  1978.   As
previously mentioned,  a  more  detailed  analysis  of  these loads will  be
conducted under the next portion of the Post-PLUARG Agreement.   Information is
presented  by  tributary  and the  associated   lake  basin  and  river  group (as
explained  in  Chapter  3) .    The  load is  presented  in  metric  tons  per year
(mt/yr)  followed  by the mean  square  error (in mt/yr)  squared.   Finally,  the
number of samples utilized to calculate the load is specified.
                                         113

-------
                          TOTAL PHOSPHORUS 1977
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 .11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 TO
 X-, *—
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
 28
 29
 30
 31
 32
 33
 34
 35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
TRIBUTARY
NAME
ST LOUIS
BO IS BRULE
NEMADJI
BAD
NEMADJI
MONTREAL
TAHttUAMENON
LAKE
BASIN
SUPE
SUPE
SUPE
SUPE
SUPE
SUPE
SUPE
RI
GR
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
PRESQUE ISLESUPE 2
STURGEON
CARP
ON TON AG AN
FORD
0 CON TO
SHEBOYGAN
PESHTIGO
FOX
PENSAUKEE
MANITOWOC
KEWAUNEE
E TWIN
SHEBOYGAN
ROOT
MENOMINEE
MILWAUKEE
ST JOSEPH
KALAMAZOO
GRAND
MUSKEGON
MANISTEE
BOARDMAN
*MANISTIQUE
WHITEFISH
ESCANABA
THUNDER BAY
RIFLE
AU GRES
CHEBOYGAN
AU SABLE
PINE
SAGINAW
GENESEE
OS W EGO
BLACK NY
RAQUETTE
GRASS
OSWEGATCHIE
SUPE
SUPE
SUPE
MICH
MICH
MICH
MICH
MICH
MICH
MICH
MICH
MICH
MICH
MICH
MICH
MICH
MICH
MICH
MICH
MICH
MICH
MICH
MICH
MICH
MICH
HURO
HURO
HURO
HURO
HURO
HURO
HURO
ONTA
ONTA
ONTA
ONTA
ONTA
ONTA
2
2
2
.1.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
*i.
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
3
3
3
3
LOAD
MT\YR

  70,3
   9,5
  37.2
  52.9
  37.2
  34.9
  21.2
   5.9
  37,3
  21,1
 141,1
   7.5
  45,6
  33,4
  20,8
 356,0
   1.8
  18.4
   4.7
  18.0
 335.7
  17.6
  50.6
  38.4
 305.1
 173.8
 513.3
  38,4
  50,4
   4,0
  39,5
   4,4
  33,0
  10,8
  13.2
   1.9
  18,0
  14.5
  84,9
 510.6
 298.9
 799,4
 146,0
  91,1
  78,1
  69.0
SQUARE
F\YR>**2
44,0
8.7
80,4
308.2
88.0
23.0
10.2
1.6
31.8,0
20,4
2667.5
2.0
196.8
7.4
3.0
1708.0
0.0
8.6
0.1
1,0
7.4
14.0
79,6
31,2
716.2
136.6
1094.2
18.9
30,8
0,4
12.8
1.2
24.9
1,1
16,9
0,1
9.2
4.4
1779,1
2282.4
2233.0
71146.0
167.7
435.0
129.2
260.8
NUM OF
SAMPLES
13
9
23
23
'->'•)
12
24
12
12
8
24
24
11
11
11
25
11
1.1
10
11
11
10
12
12
12
24
242
24
24
12
24
12
24
12
24
12
24
12
12
36
17
22
21
8
8
8
                                114

-------
TOTAL PHOSPHORUS 1978
1
9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
TRIBUTARY LAKE
NAME BASIN
ST LOUIS SUF'E
NEMAEUI SUPE
BO IS BRULE SUPE
MONTREAL SUPE
BAD SUPE
OCONTO SUPE
PRESQUE ISLESUPE
STURGEON SUPE
TAHQUAMENON SUPE
ONTONAGON SUPE
FORD MICH
MENOMINEE MICH
PESHTIGO MICH
PENSAUKEE MICH
KEWAUNEE MICH
E. TWIN MICH
MANITOWOC MICH
SHEBOYGAN MICH
ROOT MICH
FOX MICH
MILWAUKEE MICH
ST JOSEPH MICH
KALAMAZOO MICH
GRAND MICH
MUSKEGON MICH
BOARDMAN MICH
WHITEFISH MICH
MANISITEE MICH
*MANISTIQUE MICH
ESCANABA MICH
THUNDER BAY HURO
AU GRES HURO
AU SABLE HURO
PINE HURO
RIFLE HURO
CHEBOYGAN HURO
SAGINAW HURO
GENESEE ONTA
OSWEGO ONTA
BLACK NY ONTA
RIVER
GROUP
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
o
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
3
              LOAD
              MTXYR

               307,2
                86.8
                 9.8
                13.7
                54.9
                42.0
                 6.4
                29.4
                24.5
               119.0
                10.6
               102.6
                27.2
                 5.3
                22.1
                12.9
                86.0
                93.0
                50.3
               779.9
                97.4
               296.2
               200.0
               478.9
                33.7
                  3.4
                  6.4
                60.5
                52.5
                38.3
                 10.8
                  7.1
                22.4
                 72.0
                 15.8
                 30.5
                602.3
                481.8
                605.2
                113.9
 MEAN SQUARE
ERR(MTXYR)**2
NUM OF
SAMPLES
9983.4
274 . 0
19,5
2.5
49.1
46.2
0.2
71.1
8.4
1060.5
2.4
216,9
8.0
0.4
55.2
1,5
685,9
576.3
251.6
5948.4
99.0
1504.2
150.6
2891,8
43.0
0.1
2.6
81.4
26.0
49.8
1.3
1,3
3,6
1689.5
12.0
163.2
7070,2
3845,9
1746,1
397.4
8
24
7
12
12
14
11
11
24
23
24
12
4
12
27
12
12
12
12
24
12
12
24
22
24
12
12
24
24
24
12
12
12
12
23
23
35
a
11
11
        115

-------
                       SOLUBLE ORTHO PHOSPHORUS 1977
  1
  3
  A
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 13
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
 28
 29
 30
 31
 32
 33
 34
 35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
TRIBUTARY
  NAME

 ST LOUIS
 BOIS BRULE
 NEMADJI
 BAD
 NEMADJI
 MONTREAL Wl
 TAHQUAMENOf
 ONTONAGAN
 PRESQUE  I SI.
 STURGEON
 CARP
 ONTONAGAN
 0CONTO
 PESHTIGO
 FOX
 PENSAUKEE
 MANITOWOC
 KEWAUNEE
 E  TWIN
 SHEBOYGAN
 ROOT
 MENOMINEE
 ST JOSEPH
 KALAMAZOO
 GRAND
 MUSKEGON
 MANISTEE
 BOARDMAN
 *MANISTIGUE
 UHITEFISH
 ESCANABA
FORD
THUNDER-
RIFLE
AU GRES
CHEBOYGAN
AU SABLE
PINE
SAGINAW
GENESEE
OSWEGO
BLACK NY
RAQUETTE
GRASS
                     LAKE  RIVER-
                     BASIN GROUP
SURE
SURE
SURE
SURE
SURE
SSUPE
SURE
SURE
ZSUPE
SURE
SURE
SURE
MICH
MICH
MICH
MICH
MICH
MICH
MICH
MICH
MICH
MICH
MICH
MICH
MICH
MICH
MICH
MICH
MICH
MICH
MICH
MICH
HURO
HURO
HURO
HURO
HURO
HURO
HURO
ONTA
ONTA
ONTA
ONTA
ONTA
ONTA
1
1.
1
1
1
1
2
'-t
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
3
3
3
3
LOAD
MT\YR
17.2
3.3
3.5
15.9
3.5
4.2
2.6
17.1
0.8
2.5
13.5
17.1
10.0
5.0
69,6
0.5
7,2
10,7
8.0
13,5
6,7
6,6
61,0
72,0
268.5
6.5
16.2
1.2
7.2
0.7
16,2
1.2
2,1
2.0
0,6
2.0
4,5
7,1
292,4
90.9
714,8
26,6
13.5
28.6
14.8
MEAN SQUARE
ERR(MT\YR>**2
136.6
0.2
0.5
213.8
0.6
0,9
0,9
5,8
0,0
0,2
17,7
5,8
83,5
4,3
227,2
0,0
13.4
19,5
0,6
18.8
14,7
0,8
382,4
39,0
108,5
1.9
9.5
0.1
3.2
0,0
36,3
1,2
0.3
0.1
0.0
0.1
0,9
0.2
2589.3
237.8
114769.9
78,1
35.4
6,7
17.5
NUM OF
SAMPLES
4
9
10
10
9
9
12
12
12
12
8
12
11
11
12
11
11
10
11
11
10
12
12
12
243
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
24
9
11
8
7
7
8
                                116

-------
                     SOLUBLE ORTHO PHOSPHORUS 1978
 1
 2

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
 32
 33
 34
 35
TRIBUTARY LAKE
NAME BASIN
BOIS BRULE SURE
NEMADJI SURE
MONTREAL SURE
OCONTO SURE
BAD SURE
TAHQUAMENON SURE
PRESQUE ISLESUPE
STURGEON SURE
ONTONAGAN SURE
FORD MICH
MENOMINEE MICH
PESHTIGO MICH
PENSAUKEE MICH
KEWAUNEE MICH
E. TWIN MICH
MANITOWOC MICH
SHEBOYGAN MICH
ROOT MICH
FOX MICH
ST JOSEPH MICH
KALAMAZOO MICH
GRAND MICH
MANISTEE MICH
MUSKEGON MICH
BOARDMAN MICH
*MANISTIQUE MICH
WHITEFISH MICH
ESCANABA MICH
THUNDER BAY HURO
RIFLE HURO
AU GRES HURO
AU SABLE HURO
PINE HURO
CHEBOYGAN HURO
SAGINAU HURO
RIV
GRO
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
9
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
LOAD
MTXYR

   3.5
   5.4
   6.2
   3.1
  10.6
   4.7
   0.6
   6.2
  16.4
   0.5
  18.9
  31.6
   2.9
  11.6
   5.4
  41.3
  44,0
  29.4
  189.1
  48.7
  66.9
  232.9
   12.2
   11.4
    1.5
   11.0
    0.4
   16,0
    1.8
    2.8
    2.0
    3.8
   12.3
    2.7
  240.0
 MEAN SQUARE
ERR**2
NUM OF
SAMPLES
1,1
0.7
0.2
0.0
1.5
1.4
0.0
4.3
9.3
0,0
25,9
394,0
0,4
4,2
5,7
102,4
188,9
115,8
1188.7
139.4
51,9
568,5
3.0
4,1
0,1
15,1
0,0
41.0
0.2
0.2
0,2
0,2
5.0
0.3
859.5
7
8
12
13
12
12
11
11
11
12
12
4
12
13
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
22
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
23
                                  •\T!

-------
                           SUSPENDED SOLIDS 1977
  1
  2
  3
  A
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
 28
 29
 30
 31
 32
 33
 34
 35
 36
 37
 38
 39
 40
 41
 42
 43
44
TRIBUTARY
NAME
ST LOUIS
BO IS BRULE
BAD
NEMADJI
MONTREAL
TAHQUAMENON
LAKE
BASIN
SUPE
SUPE
SUPE
SUPE
SUPE
SUPE
PRESQUE ISLESUPE
STURGEON
CARP
ONTONAGAN
FORD
OCONTO
PESHTIGO
FOX
PENSAUKEE
MANITOWOC
KEUAUNEE
E TWIN
SHEBOYGAN
ROOT
MENOMINEE
MILWAUKEE
ST JOSEPH
KALAMAZOO
GRAND
MUSKEGON
MANISTEE
BOARDMAN
*MANISTIQUE
WHITEFISH
ESCANABA
THUNDER BAY
RIFLE
AU ORES
CHEBOYGAN
AU SABLE
PINE
SAGINAW
GENESEE
OSWEGO
BLACK NY
RAQUETTE
GRASS
OSUEGATCHIE
SUPE
SUPE
SUPE
MICH
MICH
MICH
MICH
MICH
MICH
MICH
MICH
MICH
MICH
MICH
MICH
MICH
MICH
MICH
MICH
MICH
MICH
MICH
MICH
MICH
HURO
HURO
HURO
HURO
HURO
HURO
HURO
ONTA
ONTA
ONTA
ONTA
ONTA
ONTA
RIVER
GROUP
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
r>
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
3
3
3
3
LOAD
MTXYR
9089,7
2063,6
42851,0
62033,4
1185,1
20875,6
1079,9
40503,2
483.8
217354.5
2313,1
7690,8
3506,9
46105,8
214,7
1464,9
544,3
.1.943,6
4334,8
4762.2
7275,4
9960,1
68767.9
23008.2
47046.9
15583,7
12903.0
483.3
10855.1
2131.6
3382.1
2548.7
5807,2
1168,1
4331,3
2735,2
114697,8
64408,5
331790,0
85778,8
24756,8
4693,8
3853,2
11446,0
MEAN SQUARE
ERR ( MTXYR )**2
1948354,0
83040.6
835567872.0
1.0
89920,0
72768160,0
2:1.2137.1
672361472,0
36500,6
6751281152.0
202748,8
11942845.0
1544790.0
50877792.0
6347.7
24563,6
15974,4
21974,4
1090685,0
9028218.0
1492029,0
2908796.0
181685968.0
6343270,0
8685259,0
29611.1.04,0
2009144,0
9383,2
7513681,0
404750,7
185289,4
295204,1
1185211,0
63280.9
770389.8
259207,5
3859277312,0
149306144.0
8261558272.0
286345472.0
10119396.0
1426200.0
85489.8
731309.7
NUM OF
SAMPLES
1 2
1.1.
24
365
12
24
12
1 2
8
24
24
1 .1.
11
25
11
11
10
11
11
12
12
12
12
24
'~>A'~>
A- **T AU
24
24
12
24
12
24
12
24
12
.23
12
12
36
9
16
15
3
8
8
                                  118

-------
                         SUSPENDED SOLIDS 1978
 1
TRIBUTARY
  NAME
LAKE  RIVER
BASIN GROUP
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
O'!>
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
 BOIS BRULE  SUPE   1
 MONTREAL    SUPE   1
 OCONTO      SUPE   1
 BAD         SUPE   1
 ST LOUIS    SUPE   1
 NEMADJI     SUPE   1
 PRESQUE ISLESUPE   2
 STURGEON    SUPE   2
 TAHQUAMENON SUPE   2
 ONTONAGON   SUPE   2
 MENOMINEE   MICH   1
 FORD        MICH   1
 PESHTIGO    MICH   1
 PENSAUKEE   MICH   1
 KEWAUNEE    MICH   1
 E. TWIN     MICH   1
 MANITOWOC   MICH   1
 SHEBOYGAN   MICH   1
 ROOT        MICH   1
 FOX         MICH   1
 MILWAUKEE   MICH   2
 ST JOSEPH   MICH   3
 KALAMAZOO   MICH   3
 GRAND       MICH   3
 MUSKEGON    MICH   4
 MANISITEE   MICH   4
 *MANISTIQUE MICH   4
 ESCANABA    MICH   4
 BOARDMAN    MICH   4
 WHITEFISH   MICH   4
 CHEBOYGAN   HURO    1
 THUNDER BAY HURO    1
 AU GRES     HURO    1
 AU SABLE    HURO    1
 PINE        HURO    1
 RIFLE       HURO    1
 SAGINAW     HURO    2
 GENESEE     ONTA    1
 OSWEGO      ONTA    2
 BLACK  NY    ONTA    3
LOAD
MTXYR
3858,1
873.7
4361.1
19835,1
102791,1
122145,8
1510,2
18867,8
4367.5
119178.6
20842,6
8840.4
5970.7
357.3
3543.0
2521.4
13622.2
18632.5
5481.1
170370.8
38988.7
71771.6
30821.8
62931.4
24107.8
14997.8
11905.7
6376.8
710,2
2397,6
3175.1
2445,6
3761.2
5864,1
81048.3
13906.1
148927.7
541773.8
1754859.0
97522,0
MEAN SQUARE
ERR < MTXYR >**2
6293354.0
39486.0
3574437.0
14110186.0
404097280.0
1.0
386464,1
75845680,0
851029,6
4508045312.0
47809648.0
18321872.0
13177562.0
19902.6
7616410.0
2319370.0
75933712.0
62755536.0
6395605,0
1519745024.0
457587712.0
206378240.0
7821415.0
615050496.0
101734000.0
2351714.0
2462751.0
3067304.0
44856.0
651620.2
136764.1
232684.2
403842.3
530202,6
3366283520,0
15346037.0
1682731264.0
5814403072.0
1063638466560.0
2624797696.0
NUM OF
SAMPLES
7
12
9
12
8
365
11
11
22
19
12
24
4
12
27
12
12
12
12
23
12
12
24
22
24
24
23
23
12
12
23
12
12
12
12
23
35
8
7
12
                                119

-------
CHLORIDE 1977
.1.
2
1
2
3
A
5
6
7
&
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
IS
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
TRIBUTARY LAKE
NAME BASIN
ST LOUIS SURE
BO IS BRULE SURE
NEMADJI SURE
BAD SURE
MONTREAL SURE
TAHQUAMENON SURE
PRESQUE ISLESURE
STURGEON SURE
CARP SURE
ONTONAGAN SURF
FORD MICH
OCONTO MICH
FOX MICH
PESHTIGO MICH
MANITOWOC MICH
PENSAUKEE MICH
SHEBOYGAN MICH
KEWAUNEE MICH
E TWIN MICH
ROOT MICH
MENOMINEE MICH
ST JOSEPH MICH
KALAMAZOO MICH
GRAND MICH
MUSKEGON MICH
MANISTEE MICH
BOARDMAN MICH
*MANISTIQUE MICH
WHITEFISH MICH
ESCANABA MICH
THUNDER BAY HURO
RIFLE HURO
AU ORES HURO
CHEBOYGAN HURO
AU SABLE HURO
PINE HURO
SAG IN AW HURO
GENESEE ONTA
OSWEGO ONTA
BLACK NY ONTA
RAQUETTE ONTA
GRASS ONTA
OSWEGATCHIE ONTA
RIVER
GROUP
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
3
3
3
3
LOAD
MTXYR
15616*9
159,6
809,5
1993,5
5659,4
2037,5
411,4
1054,5
922, 2
2435.1
552 , 4
4759,6
36054,1
2487,1
1265,7
407,8
3402,8
662,1
1649,1
3826,1
5254,4
68252,9
48568,1
95561,2
35364,2
74895,2
1698,0
2983,9
916,8
6994,9
3107,2
3788,5
2465,1
5197.5
6900,1
509,7
156433,6
141060.0
965441,2
10050,5
3106,1
4131,3
5738,6
MEAN SQUARE
ERR
.1 *•_
24
12
23
12
24
12
12
36
17
23
21
8
8
8
  120

-------
                            CHLORIDE 1978
2
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
TRIBUTARY LAKE
NAME BASIN
ST LOUIS SURE
NEMADJI SUPE
TAHQUAMENON SUPE
ONTONAGON SUPE
PRESQUE ISLESUPE
STURGEON SUPE
FORD MICH
MENOMINEE MICH
FOX MICH
MILWAUKEE MICH
ST JOSEPH MICH
KALAMAZOO MICH
GRAND MICH
MUSKEGON MICH
MANISITEE MICH
*MANISTIQUE MICH
ESCANABA MICH
BOARDMAN MICH
UHITEFISH MICH
THUNDER BAY HURO
AU GRES HURO
AU SABLE HURO
PINE HURO
RIFLE HURO
CHEBOYGAN HURO
SAGINAW HURO
GENESEE ONTA
OSUEGO ONTA
BLACK NY ONTA
RIVER
GROUP
1
1
o
2
2
r>
1
1
1
^
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
i
ti*
1
2
3
LOAD
MT\YR
25044*5
1125*0
2453*3
4075*3
606*5
2353*3
1028.0
7793*5
52688*1
17144.2
73069.6
57381*6
115942*4
39154*7
71765.8
4202.0
7636.0
2114.3
659.9
3825.4
3959.6
7838.7
689.2
5678.2
6821.5
202946.5
180482.2
1154653.0
9404.4
 MEAN SQUARE
ERR(MT\YR)**2

   10710756.0
      31860.7
     273370.9
     426324*8
       5766.9
     372009.9
       7504.1
     555200.3
    4387524.0
   37398480.0
   40175392*0
    7487332*0
  417755904*0
    1905141.0
   11505364.0
     176220.2
    3358910.0
        1329.6
        3983.9
     142194*7
     369314.9
       273.79.3
       15867.4
       38973.6
     158284.5
  1172546560.0
  3400893440*0
  6204534784.0
     1990879.0
NUM OF
SAMPLES

  8
 12
 24
 23
 11
 11
 24
 12
 24
 12
 12
 24
 ??
 24
 24
 24
 24
 12
 12
 12
 12
 12
 12
 23
 24
 35
   8
  12
  12
                                 121

-------

-------
                                   APPENDIX E

        SELECTED DESCRIPTIONS OF CURRENT AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH PROJECTS
             ON THE CAUSES AND CONTROL OF NONPOINT SOURCE POLLUTION
         This Appendix  contains descriptions  of  the select  group  of research
projects referred to in Chapter 4.  All of  the listings,  with the exception of
the first two,  were  obtained from CRIS and  are  presented in the format of the
original retrieval.  Information given includes:

         1.  sponsoring agency
         2.  period of investigation
         3.  name of the researcher
         4.  project location
         5.  description of project objectives, approach and  progress; and
         6.  recent publications.
                                        123

-------
AGENCY:  NOAA (SEA GRANT)
PERIOD:  FY 78,  FY 79
INVEST:  BROMLEY D W
LOCATION:  UNIV  OF WISCONSIN

NONPOINT SOURCE POLLUTION  IN  GREEN  BAY AND  ITS  IMPLICATION FOR WATER QUALITY
MANAGEMENT

OBJECTIVES:   To analyze  the implications  of current  and conservation-oriented
land use practices  on  the  quality of  receiving  waterways in the Green Bay
area.  To  simulate  alternative  comprehensive management policies and evaluate
their impact  on water  quality in the  lower  Fox  River-Green area.
AGENCY: OHIO STATE GOVERNMENT
INVEST: NOLTE B
PERF ORG: OHIO AGRI R&D CTR
LOCATION: COLUMBUS OHIO

PHOSPHORUS BIOAVAILABILITY STUDY FOR LAKE ERIE TRIBUTARIES

OBJECTIVE:  Determine the fraction of total P in  suspended  sediments  entering
Lake Erie that is biologically available.  Develop  a  simple model  to  predict
available P loadings to Lake Erie from suspended  sediments.

APPROACH:  Suspended sediments will be sampled during  storm events  in eight
tributaries draining into Lake Erie.  The biologically available P  in the
sediment will be determined by algae bioassay and chemical  extraction
procedures and the results correlated.  P bioavailability will also be
correlated with routine sediment characteristics  and  predictive equations  for
available P flux will be developed.
1.  Project description obtained  from  the publication, Catalog of Federal Ocean
   Pollution Research Development and Monitoring Programs, Fiscal Years 1978-
   T98?T                        —	_

2.  Project description obtained from WRE.
                                       124

-------
DIALOG FileGO: USDA/CRIS 75-79/OEC (Item   29 of  263) User 2oS1 IBjanBO
                                                                                                                              205
0073469
AGENCY: CSRS  wis
PERIOD: 01 JUL 77 TO so SEP 79
INVEST: HILSENHOFF  w L
PROJECT*: WIS0233B
PERF ORG: ENTOMOLOGY
LOCATION: UN IV OF WISCONSIN
          MADISON   WIS

EFFECTS OF LIVESTOCK GRAZING PRACTICES ON THE WATER QUALITY OF
STREAMS

OBJECTIVES:  Document effects of pasturing cattle on the fauna
and water quality of streams.   Determine  factors  associated
with   the  congregation  of  cattle  In  streams.   Determine
relationships of cattle weight.  stream flow,  cattle  access.
and water quality.

APPROACH:   Replicated laboratory tests will be carried out in
artificial  streams  at  various  temperatures   and   current
velocities to determine effects of different amounts of cattle
manure   in  the  water on selected aquatic insects known to be
sensitive to organic pollution.   The  arthropod  rauna  of  a
stream   from  which  cattle  have been fenced will be compared
before and after fenci.ng and with  a  control  stream.   Other
streams  will  be observed  to determine how many'catt1e cun be
pastured and under what conditions before the ecosystem  of  a
stream is altered.
KEYWORDS:    CATTLE   MANURE   WATER-QUALITY  STREAMS  INSECTS
POLLUTION    LIVESTOCK    GRAZING    WATER     WATER-POLLUTION
PASIEURIZATION AQUAT1C-INSECTS WATER-FLOW ANIMAL-WASTE

PROGRESS:77/01  77/12
 One   artificial  stream  with  two  8-foot  sections has  been
constructed from 3/4  inch plywood covered with several   layers
of  fiberglass to maUe it waterproof.  (he stream channels are
supported.  one above  the other.  on a frame of  2-inch   ingle
iron   with  a  movable  support   that allows the pitch of  each
stream to be varied,  thus changing the current.   Plastic  pipe
and  rubber  hoses have been used for the circulation of water
to avoid  contact with metal  ions.

PUBLICAT10NS:77/01   77/12
 NO PUBLICATIONS REPORTED THIS  PERIOD.
AGENCY: CSRS  HLU
PERIOD; 12 JUL 70 10 so SEP 79
INVEST: VANDERHOI.M  D n
PROJECT*'! ILLU-10-031 I
PERF ORG: AGRl ENGINEERING
LOCATION: UNIV OF ILLINOIS
          URDANA    ILL

HOME  SEWAGE  SYSTEMS  FOR  AREAS  WITH  SOILS  UNSUITABLE  FOR
SUBSURFACE SEEPAGE  FIELDS

OBJECTIVES:   Identify alternative home   sewage  systems   which
indicate potential  for satisfactory performance  in  area-,  where
soil  conditions are unsuitable  for subsurface seepage  fields.
Evaluate the  performance of alternative  homo  sowjiuo   •..yslcms
under  field  conditions.    Modify   and  adapt promising home
sewage systems to enhance  their  performance  and acceptability.
If necessary,  develop home sewage systems with   new   concepts
,,.i,,i,i^,  fnr. ,,oo  uhone  »iiih«,iir f ace  disooi>al  is  unfeasible or
               use  where  subsurface  disposal
suitable   for
impract ical .

APPROACH:   Install  and monitor  sewage  systems identified in  1
above.     Augment   field   studies   with   laboratory  study  of
individual  components  or   processes.     Modify  systems  v.h^ .
monitoring indicates changes  are adv i sen!) I u .

KF.YWORDS:  SEWAGE  AEROBIC-TREATMENT  SEPTIC-TANKS SEWAGE-TREATM-
ENT   OXIDATION   LAGOONS   SAND FILTERS  ALTERNATIVES PERFORMANCE
SEPTIC-SYSTEMS  SOILS EVALUATION WATER-POLLUTION SO I L-F-OL LUT 1 ON
WASTE-DISPOSAL

PROGRESS:?7/Ot   77/12
  Two  commercial  aerobic  treatment  units  and one  rec i rc.u 1 a t i ng
sand   filler   treatment   unit  were installer! at Dixon Springs
                        These  are being tested under  different
                        for evaluating acceptability of treated
                         Several filter  sands  with  different
                        are  being   tested,   both in laboratory
                       the field system.    Operational  problems
                        new  systems  are  being solved and the
Agricultural Center.
operating  conditions
sewage for discharge.
s\ ze  characteristics
column studies ond  in
associated  with  the
 coming
 data.
        year will  be
                     devoted  to  collection  and  analysis  of
 PUBLICATIONS:77/01   77/12
  NO PUBLICATIONS REPORTED THIS PERIOD.
 0070930

-------
 DIALOG File60: USDA/CRIS 75-79/DEC (Item  127 of  263) User 26t1 18Jan80
                                                                                                                               290
 0058307
 AGENCY: SAES  NY.C
 PERIOD: 01  JUL ?o TO 03 OCT 79
 INVEST: OGLESBY  R T
 PROJECT*:  NYC-14730B
 PERF ORG:  NATURAL RESOURCES
 LOCATION:  CORNELL UNIV
           ITHACA   NY

 EUTROPHICATION AND COMPERATIVE LIMNOLOGY OF  THE  FINGER  LAKES

 OBJECTIVES:    Develop  quantitative  models   applicable to  the
 marvtgenent  of  Phytoplankton levels,  water   clarity   and  fish
 production   in  the  Finger  Lakes.   Continue verification of
 hypothesis  that  soluble phosphorus inputs are   the   principal
 determinants   of   water   quality.      Continue   work with
 interdisciplinary group studying  the  origins   of  phosphorus
 entering lakes with emphasis on  diffuse sources.

 APPROACH:     Intensive   review   of  information on  globally
 distributed  lakes to ascertain validity  of   models   developed
 for   the  Finger  Lakes.    Institute a new surveillance  program
 for  the Finger Lakes to determine if   the 1973  abolition   of
 Phosphate containing detergents  In New York  State has produced
 the   predicted changes.   Participated in exchanges with other
 scientists   and   administrators   of  water   quality   programs
 through special conferences and  workshops.

 KEYWORDS:    MODELS    ALGAE   PLANKTON  WATER-QUALITY   STREAMS
 NUTlilENTS  WATER-POLLUTION  LIMNOLOGY   RUNOFF    EUTROPHICATION
 LAKES    NITROGEN   MANAGEMENT    NUTRIENT-MOVEMENT   WATERSHEDS
 PHYTOPLANKTON  200PLANKTON   PHOSPHORUS   SOURCES   DETERGENTS
 WATERSHED-MODELS  WATERSHED-MANAGEMENT

 PROGRESS:77/OI  77/12
 The  principal   activities carried   out  under  this project
 during  1977  consisted of   additional   data  analyses  and   the
 final   preparation  of  material  for publishing.   Samples were
 collected from nine of  the  lakes  on one  occasion  during   the
 winter  for total  phosphorus analysis and on three occasions  in
 the   summer   for   more   complete  chemical  and  biological
 examination.   The objective  was  to  determine what effects,    if
 any,    the   New York State  1973 ban on phosphorus in household
 laundry detergents may have  had on  water  quality.     Results
 were  ambiguous.   A study  of data collected  in previous years
 suggests that  levels of variability due to causes  other  than
phosphorus   loading  are  high enough  to mask effects  unless a
number of years of data are obtained.

PUBLICATIONS:77/01  77/12
 OGLESBY, R. T.   1977.  Phytoplankton summer  standing  crop  and
    annual  productivity as  functions of phosphorus  loading  and
    various physical factors.  J.   Fish.   Res.    Board Can.
    34:2255-2270.
 OGLESBY. R.  T.   1977.   Relationships of  fish  yield to lake
    Phytoplankton standing crop,  production,  and  morphoedaphic
   factors.  J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 34:2271-2279
BOULDIN. D. R.; CAPENER. H. R.j CASLEH. G. L.; DURFEE  A   E'
   LOEHR. R. C.; OGLESBY, R.  T.;  and YOUNG,  R.  J.   1977
   Lakes  and  phosphorus  input:   a  focus  on  management'
   Information   Bulletin   127.    N.Y.   State  College  of
   Agriculture and

-------
   DIALOG File60: USDA/CRIS 75-79/OEC (Item   26 of   28) Usoi- 2691 11JanBO
                                                                                                                                 2416
   0001617
   AGENCY: CSRS  wis
   PERIOD: 01 JUL 63 TO 30 SEP BO
   INVEST: CONVERSE  J C; BUBENZER  G 0
   PROJECT*: WIS05000-6008
   PERT ORG: AGRI ENGINEERING
   LOCATION: UNIV OF WISCONSIN
             MADISON   WIS

   ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS FOR THE 1980'S

   OBJECTIVES:   Develop optimal animal manure management systems
   to meet the evolving environmental and  economic  requirements
   and  be compatible with the  increasing needs of our nation and
   the world for animal protein.   Investigate use of by-products
   of  animal  manure  management  systems for energy source feed
   ingredients,  plant nutrients for crop  production  and  other
   potential  uses  with  consideration of the human,  animal and
   plant health factors.   Characterize the non-point  population
   water runoff sources from livestock and poultry enterprises on
   pasture   production   systems  and  land  areas  with  manure
   application and  to further develop guidelines for abatement of
   non-pollution sources from animal manure.
h-"
-j  APPROACH:  Anaerobic digesters for poultry  and ''dairy  cuttle
   manure  are  being  evaluated  for  energy inputs and outputs,
   solids degradation,  of gas composition and fertilizer  volue.
   A  liquid  manure handling system  is being developed for dairy
   replacements  utilizing  manure  scraping  with  and   without
   slatted   floors.    A  manure  nutrient  runoff model is being
   developed to  predict  nutrient  movement  of  winter  applied
   manure  during   spring  runoff.   Barnyard runoff and nutrient
   movement  is bt-ing evaluated  for medium  size  dairy  herd'.,  on
   earthen   lots  for  five  different soil conditions.   Protein
   production  utilizing  photosynethic  bacteria  and  anaerobic
   digested  effluents  is being evaluated.

   KEYWORDS:      MANURE    MANURE-MANAGEMENT    WASTE-COLLECTION
   WASl E-TRANSI'DRr  WASTE-MANAiUMENT WAS 1 E- 1 TREATMENT WAST E-UT I L 1 Z~
   ATIuN     WASTE-DISPOSAL    ANIMAL-WASTE    ANAEROBIC-DIGESTION
   POULTRY-MANURE   ENERGY  *ENS  LIQUID-MANURES  PROTEINS METHANE
   ANIMAL-NUTRITION PLANI-NUTRITION  RUNOFF  POLLUTION  PASTURES
   LAND-APPLICATION BYPRODUCTS  *ERP
obtain a range of expected concetrat ions.    Liquid  manure   is
being  applied at rates of 30 tons/acre  (equivalent to 5,   2.5
and 5 fert.)  to corn land with  fall and  spring  applications.
Manure   is   applied   by   surface   spreading  and  without
incorporation and injection.   150  Ibs.   of   18-40-0  starter
fertilizer is applied.  Corn yields and  soil  fertility v/i I I  be
evaluated  over  a  3 years period.   A  96 m(3)   layer poultry
digester with floating cover and operated at  35 degrees  C   has
been operating for 2 years.   Detention  tSHIPS  range from 30-50
days with loading rates of 1.6 - 2.9 kg  vs/m./d.  Total  solids
of leed ranged   from  8  -   13%    with   63-67%   V.S.    NH(3)
concentration  was  6500-8000  nig/1 and  pH of  7.7 -  8.0.   Gas
production ranged from 0.6 -  0.8 m./m./d.    Net energy  output
ranged from 49)£  during winter to 75% during  summer.

PUBLICAT10NS:77/01  77/12
 STEENHIJ1S, T.S., BUBENZER, G.D. and WALTER,  M.F.  1977.   Water
    movement and infiltration in frozen  soil:   theoretical  and
    experimental considerations. ASAE Paper  No. 77.2545.
 CONVERSE,   J.C.,   GRAVES,   R.E.,   and EVANS,  G.W.   1977.
    Aneaerobic degradation of dairy manure   under  mesophilic
    and thermophiIic  temperatures.  Trans of  ASAE  20:336-340.
 CONVERSE,   J.C.,   EVANS.   G.W.,   VERHOEVCN,   C.R.   1977.
    Performance  of large size anaerobic  digester   for  poultry
    manure. ASAE Paper No. 77-0451.
 STEENHUIS,  T.S.  1978.  Modeling  nigrogen  and other  nutrient
    losses from  winter spread manure PHD Thesis,  University of
    Wisconsin -  Madison.
   PROC.UESS: 77/01   77/12
    Sediment  dcpsition  patterns  and  nutrient  reductions  in  a
   gra;->s  filter   loaded  >vith  dairy  barnyard  runoff   is  ho i nij
   evaluated  on  a  runoff  table  1 meter wide and '5 meters  long.
   The grass  filter is cut sod,  placed over  100 mm of   sand   and
   soil   incorporating  a  suction  system   to approximate actual
   infiltration characteristics.   Barnyard sediment is applied at
   rates  of 0.5 and 1.0% total solids concentration.  Preliminary
   analysis of runoff  indicates removal of 87-95%  total  solids,
   88-98%. of Kheldahl nitrogen and 90-97%   total phosphoruous t>\
   the grass  filter.   Solid,  liquid  and   semi-   i>olid  manure
   storages   arc-  being  evaluated  for nutrient concentration to

-------
     DIALOG File60:  USDA/CRIS 75-79/DEC (Item   14  of    28)  User  2691  lljanBO
                                                                                                                                  2406
NJ
oo
 0057926
 AGENCY: CSRS  MICL
 PERIOD: 01  JUL 70 TO 30 SEP BO
 INVEST: GERRISH  j e
 PROJECT*:  MICL01066
 PERF ORG:  AGRI ENGINEERING
 LOCATION:  MICHIGAN STATE UNIV
           EAST LANSING   MIC

 ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS FOR THE 1980'S

 OBJECTIVES:   Develop optimal animal manure  management  systems.
 Characterize atmospheric contaminants  and  develop  abatement
 methods  to   eliminate  the contaminants'   potentially harmful
 effects on human  and  animal   health.    Investigate   us*   of
 by-products   of   animal  manure  management systems  for energy
 sources,  feed ingredients,  plant-nutrients  and other potential
 uses.    Characterize  the  non-point  pollution  water runoff
 sources  from  livestock  and  poultry   enterprises on pasture
 production systems and land areas with  manure application  and
 to   further   develop  guidelines   for  abatement  of non-point
 pollution sources from animal  manures.

 APPROACH:  Study hydraulic  transport  of  manure as practiced  in
 flushing  systems.     This  will  lead  to  design -rocommendaI ions
 and  workable  plans.     Modelling  studies  are  already  well
 underway.     In  odor  control,   we  are  studying the- effects  of
 ozone  on swine waste.    Also studying the  culture  of  purple
 sulfur  bacteria  as   an odor  modifier in anaerobic  lagoons.
 Hope  to develop  procedures  to   foster such  a  culture  under
 Michigan     climatic    conditions.     Studying   liquid-solid
 separation for its  potential   as   a  step   in  a  fermentation
 process leading  to   a re-fed  product.   Have two year's data
 from some spring-thaw  runoff events at a system  of   12  plots
 where   manure  was  applied on  the  frozen ground.    This study
 will continue  in an  attempt   to   develop  control   strategies
 which  would  minimize non-point  source pollution.    (20%  basic
 research; 60%  applied  research; 20% development effort).

 KEYWORDS:      POLLUTION-ABATEMENT     DAIRY-CATTLE      MANURES
 WATER-POLLUTION   AIR-POLLUTION  ODOR-CONIROL  TRANSPORT  SWINE
 RUNOFF  WASTE-MANAGEMENT  OZONE ANIMAL-WASTE ANAER011IC-CONDITIO-
 NS MODELING  ENERGY-SOURCES  »ENS FEED  PLANT-NUTRIENTS  LAGOONS
 SOIL-APPLICATION  FROZEN-SOILS BYPRODUCTS #ERP

 PROGRESS:78/01   78/12
 Woi-k with the anaerobic swine waste  lagoons at MSU  has led  to
 new  insights  in  design   and management of such  lagoons.    A
 system  involving  two   lagoons  has  been  shown  effective   in
 reducing  the  time  during  which odors can be produced;   the
 basic  features of the system include  a strategy to preserve   a
 population  of purple sulfur bacteria during the  cold Michigan
 winter by maintaining one of the  two  lagoons  in   a  lightly
 loaded  state  throughout   the  winter.    In the  spring It has
 little scum,   good  light penetration,   and  warms  up  quickly  so
bacteria  become active early.   A mathematical model  has been
                                                                        developed to provide  a  quantitative  analysis  of  the  purple
                                                                        sulfur   bacterial   processes  in a lagoon.   The model  predicts
                                                                        hydrogen sulfide production.     Purple  sulfur  bacteria  show
                                                                        promise   of   being  a  useful  odor control  mechanism for lagoons
                                                                        even  in  our  cold Michigan  climate.    Analysis of data  from  an
                                                                        iconic model  of under slat  swine waste flushing has led to the
                                                                        development   of  a  mathematical   approach  for designing under
                                                                        slat  flushing systems.   This  approach should  be  a   valuable
                                                                        tool  for  accurately   predicting  the performance of
                                                                        before it  is  bu i I t .

                                                                        PUBLICATIONS:78/01  78/12
                                                    system
                                                                        VAN  LOTR1NGEN,
                                                                           Odors   from
                                                                           Unpublished
             T.J.M.  (1978).  Control of Hydrogen  Sulfide
             Anaerobic  Lagoons by Purple Sulfur Bacteria.
             Ph.D.   Thesis.    Agricultural   Englnaorlng
Department, Michigan State University.
            T.J.M. and GERRISH, J.B.   (1970).  H2S Removal
                                                                        VAN LOTRINGEN,
                                                                           by Purple Sulfur Bacteria  in Swine Waste  Lagoons.

-------
DIALOG File60: USDA/CR1S 75-79/DEC (Item
7 of   28) User 2691 lljanBO
                                                                                                                             2399
                                                                    NO PUBLICATIONS REPORTED THIS PERIOD.
007P425
AGENCY: SAES  OHO
PERIOD: 01 NOV 76 TO 31 OCT 79
INVEST: WHITE  R K; VAN KEUREN  R w;  EDWARDS  w
PROJECT*: OH000255
PERI  ORG: AGR1 ENGINEERING
LOCATION: OHIO AGRICULTURAL R AND D CENTER
          COLUMBUS   OHO

EFFLCT OF PASTURING ON NON-POINT SURFACE RUN-OFF

03JLCTIVES:   Establish  the  contribution  of pollutants from
livestock  pasturing   (non-point   sources),     to   identify
man.ige iient  practices that can be used lo significantly reduce
non-point surface runoff pollution and to  predict  what  will
happen to hydrologic and water Duality parameters ir> non-point
surl.ice   runoff  from  livestock  pastures.    The  following
specific objectives will be addressed:  Obtain hydrologic  and
chemical  data  for  each  runoff event on selected watershed.
Evaluate  hydro-chemical  data  for  selected  watersheds  and
compare  with hydrologic history of the watersheds to identify
hydi-uloglc factors and management practices that contribute to
or decrease contribution of pollutants  to  non-point  surface
runoff.    Establish the degree of bacterial pollution present
in  non-point  surface  runoff  from  cattle  pastures  during
different periods of the year.

APPROACH:  Samples will be taken periodically throughout storm
events from watersheds  where  beef  cattle  are  pastured  as
follows:   Summer rotational pasturing and winter feeding with
hay brought lo the cattle;  only summer  rotational  pasturing
and  winter   feeding  on   field  stored  hay  and saved autumn
regrowth.   The samples will be analyzed for N,P,  TOC,   BOD,
COD, sediment yield and sediment N and P.

KEYWORDS:     WATER-CHEMISTRY   ROTATIONAL-GRAZING   MANAGEMENT
SEDIMENT-YIELD BACTERIA WATER-POLLUTION PREDICTION SEASONAL-H-
ISTORY NON-POINT-POLLUTION WATERSHEDS SURFACE-WATER  POLLUTION
F'HO:;(WJRUS  HYDROLOGY  NITROGEN WATER-QUALITY WASTE-MANAGEMENT
CATTLE PASTURES SEDIMENTS  RUNOFF

PROGR£SS:70/OI  70/12
  Two years of data have been  collected  on   three  watersheds
with different pasturing regimes.  A control  watershed  is also
being  monitored.    Runoff  samples  are being analyzed for  N
(NH(3),  N0(2)/N0(3), and total N),  total P.  TOC.  COD,  BOD.
sediment  yield and sediment N and  P.  Also monthly samples  for
microbiological  analyses  are  collected and testc-d for total
coliform,   fecal col I form  and fecal streptococci.   A complete
record   of  pasture  and   livestock  management  is being kept.
Data are being analyzed for effects  of  pasturing  on  runoff
quantity and  quality.   Data collection will end on October  31,
1979.    Project will continue for  an additional  five months  to
allow  for data reduction,  summarization and evaluation.

PUBLICATIONS:78/01   78/12

-------
    DIALOG Flle60: USDA/CRIS 75-79/DEC (Item   81 of  263) User 2ti91 ISJanBO
                                                                                                                                   249
U)
o
    0064026
    AGENCY: CSRS  PEN
    PERIOD: 01 JUL 74 TO 30 SEP 79
    INVEST: SOPPER  W E; LYNCH  J A; CORBETT  E S
    PROJECT*: PEN02113
    PERF ORG: FOREST RESOURCES
    LOCATION: PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY
              UNIVERSITY PARK   PA
    EFFECTS  OF  FOREST
    YIELD AND QUALITY
                      WATERSHED   MANAGEMENT  PRACTICES ON WATER
OBJECTIVES:   Evaluate  the  effects  of  forest  clearcutting  and
herbicide  vegetation control  on  water  yield and water quality.

APPROACH:  Three  completely  instrumented experimental forested
watersheds will be  used  in the study.   One of the  watersheds
is  approximately  50  percent clearcut.  Herbicides are being
used   to   control   vegetation   regrowth.     Streamflow   and
precipitation  records   will  be  used  to determine changes  in
water  yield quantity.  Water  samples will be collected  weekly
at  four   locations along  the stream channel in each watershed
to evaluate the effects  of   the  progressive  cleancutting  on
water  qua'i ty.

KEYWORDS:     REVEGETATION    WATER   HYDROLOGY   PRECIPITATION
MANAGEMENT  RUNOFF  FORESTRY  WATERSHEDS   FOREST-CLEARCUTT1NG
HERBICIDES CLEARCUTTING  WATERSHED-MANAGEMENT FOREST-MANAGEMENT
WATER-QUALITY WATER-YIELD  FOREST-WATERSHEDS STREAM-FLOW

PROGRESS:78/01  78/12
  1978  nutrient  concentration data indicated that N0(sub 3)-N
and  K  continued   to    be    significantly   higher   on   the
clearcut-herbicided   watershed    than   on   the  undisturbed
watershed,   but  at  levels  lower  than  recorded  in  1977.
Interestingly,    the  highest N0(oub 3)-N data occurred at  the
headwaters and progressively  decreased towards  the  mouth   of
the watershed.  This apparently  resulted because  of the larger
amount  of  logging residue and  undecomposed organic matter on
the  more  recently  cut-herbicided  upper  portion   of   the
watershed  than on  the lower  portion and the greater potential
for increased nutrient leaching due to  soil   condition.    In
addition,   some  dilution occurred batween the headwaters  and
the mouth of  the watershed due to  increasing streamflow.   Mg,
Na.   Ca,  and SO(sub 4)  concentration data and trends did  not
appear to be  significantly  different   from  those  previously
reported.    Turbidity continued to be significantly higher on
the treated watershed as a result of increased channel  erosion
due to increased stream discharge.    This  is   partly  due   to
increased stability of the stream channel.   Monitoring  of  Na,
Mg,  K.   N0(sub 3)-N,  SOfsub 4),   Ca.   turbidity.   alkalinity,
specific conductance,  and stream temperatures  is  continuing.

PUBLICATIONS:78/01  78/12
  CORBETT.  E.  S..  J. A.  LYNCH, W. E.  SOPPER.    1978.    Timber
    harvesting  practices  as  related  to  water   quality   i"
  eastern United States.  J.  For.  76(8):  484-488.
   K-   p-     1978.    Local  perceptions of  problem-solving
  auspices.  NE-89 Working   LULOFF, A.  E..   STOKES,   C.   S.
  1977.     A   Note   on    Population  Size   and   Community
  Differentiation  in NonmetropoIitan Communities.   Soc.   and
  Social Res. 61(4):486-496.
MILLER. M. K.. STOKES, C. S.  1978.   Health  Status.   Health
  Resources   and   Consolidated   Structural    Parameters:
  Implications for Public Health  Care Policy.  J.  Health  and
  Social Behavior  19(3):263-279.
WILKINSON, K. p.   1978.  Rural Community  Change.    Chapter  7
  in T. R. Ford (ed.),  Rural USA:   Persistence and Change.
  Iowa State University Press, pp. 115-125.
WILKINSON, K.  p.   1979.   Social Well-Ueing  and Community.
  J. Community pevulopinent Society 10(Juno) (In

-------
DIALOG File60: USDA/CRIS 75-79/DEC (Item  239  of   263)  User  26£1  18jan80
                                                                                                                              385
0010833
AGENCY: SAES  MIN
PERIOD: 01 c;ipacities of
Minnesota's forest,  apply procedures to selected  counties or
regions    in   Minnesota,    and  analyze  the  forest  policy
implications of results obtained when  procedure   is  applied.
Problen   analysis   will    involve'  review   of  literature,
consultation with researchers, administrators and others,  and
preparation  of  report  specifying  problems and  the research
needed  to alleviate such problems.

KEYWORDS: POLICY-FORMULATION COSTS OPPORTUNITIES  FINANCIAL-AN-
ALYSIS  ECONOMICS FOREST-PRODUCTION   POLICIES  lA'.V  LEGISLATION
FORESTRY  ECONOMIC-IMPACT  ANALYSIS  MLASUREMENI   PRODUCTIVITY
FORES I-ECONOMICS WATER-POLLUTION

PROGRESS:77/01  77/12
  Two public timber sales  are  being evaluated   for  economic
consequences of managing non-point  sources of water pollution.
Costs   of  pollution  curbing  practices  have been  gathered and
related to timber  sale  revenues.    17  state   forest  practice
acts   and  implementing  rules are  being analyzed  to  determine
forest  practices   addressed,   notification  system   employed,
composition  of   forest  practice   board  and nature  of  agency
authority-   25 personal  interviews  to  identify  preference  for
a state forest practice  and  means of implementing  it  have  been
completed.     Final   reports  on  the  biological  and economic
timber producing   potential   of   Minnesota's   forests  and   on
Minnesota  special   interest groups  important  to forest  policy
development are being prepared.   Problem analysis of  political
forces  important   to  development   of   forest   policies    has
 identified agenda-building,   criteria,   methods  of   policy
research,  information sources  and types, and  institutions  (eg.
special  Interest  groups)  as  broad research areas.    Peliminary
report  on  use  and  management of forest 1 and sold by Itasca
County has been completed.   474 individuals  purchased  13355
ha.   between 1960 and 1977.   72 corporations purchased 37232
ha.  during same  period.  Research  has  been  undertaken  \.u
define  status  of  vertical and horizontal integration in the
wood-based industry,  analyze consequences of such  integration
and identify problems in need of research.

PUBLICATIONS:77/01  77/12
 ELLEFSON, P.V. and SPUHR.  S.H.  "Forest Policy Research:  An
    Examination of Research Needs".  (1977).  In:   Rese.jrch in
    Forest  Economics  and  Forest  Policy  Resources   for the
    Future. Washington, D.C.
 PALM.  S.L.  and ELLQFSOM,  P.V.  Paricipants   In   the  Youth
    Conservation  Corps:   Case  Study of the Bald  Eagle Camp.
    Minnesota Forestry Note No. 265. June 1977.
 WALLING, T.K.  1977. Special Interest Groups and Forest Policy
    Formation:  A Case Study of Minnesota.  (M.S.   Manuscript)
    Univ. of Minn., St. P.iul, MN 70 p.
 JAKES,   P.J-   1977.  The UioIogicaI and  Economic Potential of
    Minnesota's Commercial  Forest  Land  to  Produce   Timber.
    (M.S. Manuscript) Univ. of Minn., St.
 Paul, MN 76 p.
 ELLEFSON, P.V. "Focus on Forest  Investments:  What Policy  for
    SAF?"  1977. Journal of  Forestry 75:429-430

-------
    DIALOG Flle60: USDA/CRIS  75-79/DEC  (Item   25 of   28) User 2691 11JanBO
                                                                                                                                  2415
LO
    0010830
    AGENCY: SAES  MIN
    PERIOD: 01 JUL 68 TO 30 JUN 79
    INVEST: BROOKS  K N
    PROJECT*: MIN-42-035
    PERF ORG: FORESTRY
    LOCATION: UNIV OF MINNESOTA
              ST PAUL   MIN

    FOREST-WATERSHED MANAGEMENT EFFECTS ON QUANTITY AND QUALITY OF
    RUNOFF
    OBJECTIVES:
                  Develop  methodology  to  evaluate  and
 -j""t>_ i i vcj.    ueveiop  meinoaoiogy  to  evaluate   and   predict
 quantity  of  runoff  from forested and other  wildland  watersheds
 in  Minnesota.    Assess forest  management  and  related land   use
 impacts    on  the  quality  of  runoff  in  order  to   develop
 management   guidelines  to  minimize  non-point    sources    of
 pollution from forested lands.

 APPROACH:    Snowmeit  and rainfa I 1-runoff  prediction  models  for
 forested  watersheds will  be  evaluated and modified   as  needed
 to   conform  with  data/information  availability and Minnesota
 conditions.    Model sensitivity  will  be  tested to determine  if
 land  nanagement   impacts  on   the  quantity  of runoff can  be
 predicted.     Non-point  pollution  problems  associated  with
 forestry  will  be  assessed   initially   on  a  broad-scale  to
 identify  types  of quality  problems and  locations  of  problem
 areas  in  Minnesota.    Water quality  of runoff from undisturbed
 forests will be evaluated  and  contrasted  to quality  of  runoff
 from managed forests  and causative factors will be identified.
 Prediction   models    will  be developed  to  facilitate  the
 establishment of  management guidelines.

 KEYWORDS: FORESTRY  FOREST-MANAGEMENT  RUNOFF RAINFALL-RUNOIF-R-
 ELATION   WATER-QUALIIY    WATER-POLLUTION   LAND-USE    MODELS
 PREDICTION WATERSHEDS  LAND-MANAGEMENT  HYDROLOGY

 PROGRESS:77/OI   77/12
 Study  of  applications   of aerial photography to assess lake
 water quality on  trophic   state   is  completed.     B&W  aerial
 photography  was  used   to  predict  Seechi  disk transparency.
 turbidity,  and color.   Procedures were developed to use film
 transmitlance—Secchi  disk relationships to estimate  Carlson's
 Trophic  State  Index  (TS1).   Predicted TSI value for 6 lakes
 were not different  from TSI values  determined  directly  from
 field  data.     Methods  of evaluating base-line water qu.ility
data from  undisturbed  watersheds  are  being  studied.    In
addition.    onsite evaluation procedures for identifying areas
 "sensitive"   to  forest  management   activities    are   being
developed.     Applications  of  aerial  photography   will   be
 investigated.  Meteorological and hydorlogic measurements will
be made for an  undisturbed peat land and for  sites   which  will
undergo   changes   associated   with  peat I and   drainage  and
harvesting.      Study    sites   have    been     selected    and
 instrunentation  is  in  place  for  the  next   field  season.
Stormflow,  water yield and water  quality  will   be   studied.
Three  snowmelt  prediction  models  have  been   tested  under
different vegetation  types  in  Minnesota.    An   accumulated
degree-d iy approach.  a modified Corps of Engineer  generalized
snowmelt equation approach.  ancl a modified   Leaf-Brink  model
were investigated.   Survival and growth of vegetation  planted
on iron-ore  overburden  material  which  was  irrigated   with
secondary sewage effluent will continue to be measured.    3  to
4 years ol data will be collected.

PUBLICAIIONS:77/01  77/12
 BROOKS.  K.N.  et al.  1977.  FeasibiIity of  using   iron-ore
    overburden  material  as a media for disposal of secondary
    sewage effluent in northeastern Minnesota.
 Bulletin 93,  Water Resources  Research  Center.   Univ.   of
    Mlnnsota.
 BROOKS, K.N. et al. 1977.   Assessment of water quality status
    and trends in Minnesota by remote sensing techniques. OWRT
    Project  Completion Report.  College of Forestry. University
    of  Minnesota.
 WERTH. L..  MEYER.  M.  and BROOKS.  K.N.  1977.  A wetlands survey
    of  the Twin Cities 7-County Metropolitan   Area-West  Half.
    Institute  of  Agriculture,    Forestry and Home Economics.
    Remote Sensing Laboratory Re^cu, v,,. n^,j^, i  77-10.

-------
DIALOG F1le60: USDA/CR1S 75-79/DEC (Item  182 of  263) User 2091 18janOO
                                                                                                                               333
00422-10
AGENCY: ARS  3505
PERIOD: 2? FEB 75 TO 27 FEB 79
INVLST: YOUNG  R A; ONSTAO  c A; HOLT
PROJECT*: 3505-20000-002
PERF ORG: USOA-ARS TILLAGE WATER USE &
          SOIL-PLANT-ATMOS RES
LOCATION: MC SOIL CONSERVATION RES LAB
          MORRIS   WIN
R F
MECHANICS  AND  CONTROL
ASSOCIATED SOILS
                         OF  SOIL  EROSION BY tfATER-BARNES AND
OBJECTIVES:  Particle size distribution of  Soil  oroclecl  from
rill and interrill zones and the deposition characteristics of
soil  particles  of  various  sizes.    Study  the  effect  of
impacting raindrops on the erosion process in  a  small  rill.
Provide  data  for  developing  and  verifying a comprehensive
erosion mode I.

APPROACH:  Using simulated rainfall on  laboratory  and  field
plots,   study erosion,  runoff,  and infiltration on a.t least
throe soils  in a fallow condition on slopes ranging from 4  to
10%.   Instrument  the outlets and distributed upland points of
two small watersheds,   one  primarily  agricufturaI  and  one
forested, and collect soil, water, and nutrient movement data.

KEYWORDS:  DEPOSITION INFILTRATION SLOPES SOIL-EROSION EROSION
EROSION-CONTROL SOIL-TRANSPORT  SOIL-PARTICLES SOIL-LOSS RUNOFF
RAINFALL RAINDROP-EROSION SOIL-PROPERTIES SPLASH-EROSION SOILS
WATERSHEDS RILL-EROSION MODELS  PARTICLE-SIZE

PROGRESS-.77/01  77/12
 Soil loss from  3  different   soils  subjected  to  simulated
rainfall was separated  into that portion originating  in rills
and that originating  in  interrill areas.  The relative amounts
of  rill  and   interril  eroded soil  were  related   to  soil
properties such as aggregation,  aggregate stability,  organic
matter, and  particle  size distribution.  A modified rainulator
combined with a sprinkler system was used to measure soil  loss
and   runoff   from  22.9 in,  15.7 in,  91.4 m,  and  137.2 m  long
plots.   Results will be  used   to  modify   the  slope   length
exponent  of   the  USLE  for  long slope  lengths.   Three Pacific
Northwest soils were  tested under simulated  rainf.ill   in   the
 laboratory.     Erosion   from  rill  and   interrill  areas   was
measured separately and  sediment   characteristics  determined
 for   compariosn  with midwest  soils.   Techniques  to  estimate
sediment yields  from  watersheds have undergone  limited testing
with  good   success.     In  addition   to  predicting   sediment
quantities,   magnitudes  of  upland sources  are a I ;.o predicted
 for   the  purpose  of  economic application  of   conservation
pract ices.

PUBLICATIONS:77/01  77/12
 YOUNG.  R.A.  and MUTCHLER,  C.K. Erodibility of some Minnesota
    soils. Jour.  Soil  and W.;Uer Consev. 32( 1977) : UiO-102.
GILLEY. J.E., GEE. G.W., BAUER,  A..  WILLIS  W.O.   and  YOUNG.
   R.A.  Infiltration at surface-mined  sites  in  western North
   Dakota. North Dakota Farm Research 34(1976):32-34.
GILLEY. J.E., GEE, G.W., I1AUER,  A., WILLIS,   W.O.   and  YOUNG,
   R.A.   Runol f ciruJ erosion characteristics  of  surface-mined
   sites   in   western   North   Dakota.      Trans.      ASAE
   20 ( I 377) :6>J7-700-
ONSTAD, C.A.. YOUNG, R.A.. and MOLDENHAUER. W.C.  Implementing
   soil  loss limits:  some considerations.   In  Soil  Erosion:
   Prediction and Control. SCSA, Ankeny,  Iowa (1977):332-335.
FOSTER.  G.R.,  MEYER,  L.D.  and ONSTAD,   C.A.    An   erosion
   equation  derived  from  basic erosion principles.   Trans.
   ASAE 20(4):67B-6B2.  (1977).

-------
 DIALOG File60: USDA/CRIS 75-79/DEC (Item  157 of  263)  User 2691  IBjanBO
                                                                                                                               311
 0075177
 AGENCY:  SAES   wis
 PERIOD:  01  JUL 77  TO  30  JUN  BO
 INVEST:  PETERSON   A E; CONVERSE   J c; SWANSON  R A
 PROJECT*: WIS00023-M
 PERF  ORG: SOIL SCIENCE
 LOCATION: UNIV OF  WISCONSIN
          MADISON   WIS

 EFFECTIVENESS  OF WATER CONTROL PRACTICES FOR PROTECTING RUNOFF
 WATER QUALITY  FROM TURKEY  EXERCISE YA

 OBJECTIVES: Evaluate  the sediment, nutrient and fecal coliform
 bacteria  contributions  to  surface waters from surface runoff
 associated  with   animal   feeding/exercise  nreas.    Evaluate
 movement  of   nitrates   in   ground  waters  in the vicinity of
 storage  ponds,  disposal  fields used for Irrigation purposes or
 in  the grassed waterways.    Evaluate changes in  physical  and
 chemical properties of soils.

 APPROACH:   A   nutrient  budget will be determined by measuring
 and calculating turkey manure production in the exercise areas
 and by measuring   nutrient   losses  by  runoff  and  leaching.
 Measure  the   nutrients  lost by runoff,  wator stage recorders
 will  be  installed  in  the waterways at both protluction unite, to
 measure  total  runoff  volume.   Ths runoff will be sampled with
 an  I SCO  automatic   sampler  to  get  uniform sampling of the
 runoff In the  waterway when  it occurs.   Monitor  leaching  of
 nutr i ent s   observalion   we 1 1s  w i I 1 be estab I i shed in e  !
 analysis.   Water  analysis will be done,  using the  "Standard
 Methods  of  Water  Analysis"   of  the American Public Health
 Association.    All soil  samples will be analyzed  through  the
 routine procedure  for pH, organic matter,   avail.   P,  avail  K
 and S.

 KEYWORDS:   RUNOFF  WATER-POLLUTION  FECAL-COLIFORMS   IURKEYS
 NITRATES  GROUND-WATER   WATER-QUALITY HYDROLOGY SOIL-CHEMISTRY
 SOIL-PHYSICS    NUTRIENT-BUDGET    ANIMAL-WASTE    POULTRY-MANURE
 NUTRIENT-LOSSES WATER-ANALYSIS SOIL-ANALYSIS SEDIMENTS

 0040370
 AGENCY:  ERS  NRE
 PERIOD:  17 JUL  74  TO  17  JUL  ?e
 INVEST:  MCDRITT  J
 PROJECT*: NRE-41-300-26-01
 PERF ORG: NATURAL  RESOURCE ECON DIV ERS
 LOCATION: MICHIGAN STATE UNIV
          EAST  LANSING   MIC

 ECONOMICS OF CONTROLLING AGRICULTURAL NONPOINT  POLLUTION

OBJECTIVES:  Analyze the aggregate level, alternative  sediment,
plant   nutrient  and nestirine mil lut 1nn nhatf>cnr»:it nniirinc m\
 production costs,  food and  fiber  prices.   and  comparative
 production  advantages  among regions;  determine economically
 efficient  methods available to farmers to achieve  alternative
 levels  of  pollution  control;   and  develop  information
 prospective  effects  of  nonpoint  pollution   abatement
 agriculturally related sectors.
on
on
 APPROACH:    Information  will   be  collected  on the extent of
 agricultural  nonpoint  pollutants and measures to  control  it.
 Analytical   techniques  will   range from a partial  analysis of
 the   cost   effectiveness  of   various  control  techniques  to
 regional   and national  linear  programming model.   Included in
 the  one. lysis  will  ho on evaluation of I oast-cost  nHorm. t I ve-»
 for   limiting nonpoint  pollutants and an appraisal  of regional
 and  Interregional  production effects resulting from  pollution
 control.

 KEYWORDS:    LEAST-COST   ALTERNATIVES POLICIES PRODUCTION-COSTS
 PRICES  POLLUTANTS  COMPARATIVE-ADVANTAGE  POLLUTION-ABATEMENT
 ECONOMICS   POLLUTION  PESTICIDES SEDIMENTATION PLANT-NUTRIENTS
 PRODUCTION-EFFICIENCY  WATER-POLLUTION SOIL-POLLUTION
0043994
AGENCY: ARS  3502
PERIOD: 23 AUG  ?/  TO 23  AUG 92
INVEST: LARSON  w  E; HOLT  R  f; ONSTAD  C  A
PROJECT*: 3502-20700-OO3
PERF ORG: USDA-ARS SOIL  & WATER RESEARCH
          RM201 SOIL SCIENCE  BLDG
LOCATION: UNIV  OF MINNESOTA
          ST PAUL   MIN

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES OF REMOVAL OF CHOP RESIDUES

OBJECTIVES:   Determine  the  environmental  impact of removing
crop residue from the land for the major Land  Resource  Areas
of the United States.

APPROACH: Crop  residue production will be computed.  Water and
wind  erosion,    water  runoff,   and nutrient removal will be
calculated for  five ti I I age-res I due management systems.   Crop
production data will  be obtained from Agricultural Statistics.
The  Universal   Soil Loss Equation,  the Wind Trosion Equation,
and the SCS runoff procedure will  be used.    Areas where  crop
residues can be safely removed will be determined.

KEYWORDS:  MANAGEMENT  SOIL-EROSION SOIL-LOSS WATER WIND-EROSION
EROSION   ENVIRONMENTAL-IMPACT  CROP-RESIDUES  SOIL-MANAGEMENT
NUTRIENT-REMOVAL RUNOFF TILLAGE EROSION-CONTROL

-------
DIALOG FileGO: USDA/CRIS 75-79/DEC (Item   27 of   263)  User 2o9l  IBjanOO
                                                                                                                              204
007H)59
AGENCY: CSRS  MIN
PERIOD: 01 DEC 76 TO 30 JUN 82
INVEST: SCHULER  R T; BLAKE  G R; CROOKSTON
PROJECT*: MIN-12-028
PERF ORG: AGRI ENGINEERING
LOCATION: UNIV OF MINNESOTA
          ST PAUL   MIN

REDUCED  TILLAGE STUDIES EMPHASIZING ENERGY.
CONSERVATION ON A SANDY LOAM SOIL
    R  K
     SOIL,   AND WATER
OBJECTIVES:  To develop reduced  tillage  practices  with  low
energy  requirements,  erosion control,  moisture con&orvntI on
and maxtmum yield.   Reduced  tillage systems will be compared
to  conventional methods.   Special emphasis will be placed on
corn, soybeans and potato production on sandy loam soils.
APPROACH:  Four tillage treatments with five cropping  syste
will  be  established.    All test plots will be irrigated a
chemical weed control will be utilized.
water  consumption,  soil water levels,
will be collected.   Susceptibility to wind
evaIuated.
                 t eniG
                   nil
  Data on energy use,
temperature and yield
    eros i on  will   be
KEYWORDS:      #EMP     0EMR    EROSION-CONTROL    CROP-YIELDS
SANDY-LOAM-SOILS   CROPP1NG-SYSTEMS   HERBICIDES    SOIL-WATER
TEMPERATURE    ENERGY-REQUIREMENTS    NON-TILLAGE   IRRIGATION
CONSERVATION   TILLAGE   WATER-CONSERVATION    MINIMUM-TILLAGE
SOIL-CONSERVATION ENERGY-CONSERVATION REDUCED-TILLAGE SOYBEANS
CORN EROSION ENERGY POTATOES

PROC,RESS:77/OI  77/12
 The   cropping  systems  and  tillage  treatments  have  been
established  at  the  OecKer  Experiment  Farm.    Data   wero
collected  from  field  plots  and  analyzed  but  niay  not be
meaningful as all plots had been  fall  plowed  and  seeded  to
winter rye.   Data collected were yield (potatoes,  corn,  and
soybeans),  plant population (corn and  soybeans)   and  early
plant  growth (corn).   The yield for the two potato varieties
(Norland and Russet Bur-bank) and  the soybeans was not affected
significantly by tillage treatments.   Tillage did affect corn
yield at the 90% significance level where the chisel treatment
yield   was  higher   than  trie  other  tillage   treatments  of
nioldooard plow,  till  plant  and  no  till.     Equipment  and
Instrumentation were  obtained or  fabricated which will t>e used
to evaluate the energy requirement of the field  operations.

PUBLICATIONS:77/01  77/12
 NO PUBLICATIONS REPORTED THIS PERIOD.
006G720
AGENCY: SAES  NY.C
PERIOD: o« OCT 74 TO 30 SEP 79
INVEST: HAITH  D A
PROJECT*: NYC-123325
PERF OH(j: AGRI ENGINEERING
LOCATION: CORNELL UNIV
          ITHACA   NY

LAND USE AND WATER QUALITY

OBJtCTIVES:    Methods  will  be  developed   to  estimate   the
magnitudes of nonpoint sources of nitrogen and  phosphorus   in
runoff  waters  from  agricultural   and   rural   land.  Control
measures will be evaluated  for effectiveness  and costs.

APPROACH: A  linear programming model  will be  used  to determine
cost-effective management plans.    The general  approach  will
rely   on  existing  and  readily  available   data   and will  be
suitable  for use  in regional water  quality and  land management
planning.    Particular  attention   will  be  given  to   crop
selection  and  management  practices,    suitable  to New  York,
which  can reduce  runoff and improve runoff quality.    The   use
of  buffer   areas  along  waterways  to   filter  nutrients  from
runoff will  be  investigated.   The  project will  utilize  data
from previous and ongoing studies.   No  field  experimental work
will   be  undertaken.   Data requirements  for  implementation of
the approach in any given   study  are  land   use,    soils   and
topographic   maps    and    agricultural   census    and   daily
precipitation summaries.

KEYWORDS:   BUFFERS ENGINEERING SOILS TOPOGRAPHY   PRECIPITATION
RUNOFF COSTS LINEAR-PROGRAMMING  LAND-MANAGEMENT  WATER-POLLUTI-
ON  MODELS WATER-QUALITY  PLANNING  NITROGEN PHOSPHORUS  LAND-USE

PROGRESS:77/01   77/12
  The   accuracy  of  a  simple   loading  function  approach   to
estimating  nutrient  losses  from  agricultural  land  in  rainfall
and  snoa.melt   runoff has been  tested using  water  quality data
 from  a 330  km.  watershed.    A  continuous simulation model   has
been  developed  to predict  losses  of nitrogen and phosphorus in
cropland  runoff  and  percolation.   The model does not require
calibration and has been validated using data  from  monitored
 field plots.

 PUBLICAT10NS:77/01   77/12
  TUBBS.  L.  J.  and HA1FH.  D. A.   1977.   Simulation of nutrient
     losses from cropland.  Amer.  Soc. of Agr. Engineers.   Paper
     No.  77-2502.

-------
     DIALOG FileGO:  USDA/CR1S 75-79/DEC (Item   II of  263) Use
                                                                 2G<)1  IBJanfJO
                                                                                                                                     193
UJ
     007-1954
     AGENCY:  CSRS  ILLU
     PERIOD:  01  APR  70 TO 30 SEP 79
     INVEST:  SCOTT   d T OR
     PROJECT*:  1LIU-05-0320
     PCiJF ORG:  AGRI  ECONOMICS
     LOCATION:  UNIV  OF ILLINOIS
               UROANA   ILL
    ECONOMIC
    ILLINOIS
           FEASIBLITY  OF  SUPPLEMENTAL  IRRIGATION IN SOU liltRN
OBJECTIVES:  Collect  and project a set of  phys
uat,,   for    on-fonm    r;i|n-fnl|   c,,i tr.hmont
supple nen t a I   irrigation  costs  based on a  p
I oc.it (ons  In  the  claynan soils in southern Il
yield  ctata  on  corn  and soybeans and rainfall
project  yields  for   adequate  water-   availabi
potential  reduction  in pollutants  into  stre
of  catchment   reservoirs  for  water  reuse.
reduction  of   risk   when adequate water  is  a
production.   Estimate  aggregate supply respo
at  different   levels of  water availability  a
benefit  to society as a whole.
                                                  ical  and economic
                                                   rueorvolrs   ,inU
                                                  robability  sample
                                                  linois.   Col loot
                                                   pattern data  
-------
                                                                                                                             2411
DIALOG Ftle60: USOA/CRIS 75-79/DEC (Item   21  of    28)  User 2691  IIJanBO



0040644
AGENCY: ARS  3505
PERIOD: 02 NOV 73 TO 02 NOV 79
INVEST: YOUNG  R A; ONSTAD  c A
PROJECT*: 3505-20790-001
PERF ORG: USDA-ARS POLLUTION SEROSION RE
          S
LOCATION: NC SOIL CONSERVATION RES LAB
          MORRIS   MIN

FIELD  DETERMINATION  OF NUTRIENTS AND SEDIMENT FROM NON-I'OINT
SOURCES

OBJECTIVES: Assess the  impact of man on nutrient enrichment of
lakes and streams.  Develop hydro logic arid nutrient budget fop
agricultural and  nonagricultural  watersheds.   Relate  -taler
quality  and  sediment   yield to watershed land use practices.
Model agricultural chemical transport.

APPROACH:   Locate and map watersheds one square mile  or   less
that contain  agricultural, nonagricultural, and urban  land use
practices.  Ontain soil  surveys,  from plans, animal, cropping.
and   other   use  practices.   and  environmental  parameters.
Hydrological,   soil,  and water quality will be  monitored  at
points    of    cultural,     geological.    ands topographic
di scout inui t ies.

KEYWORDS:      EUTROPHICATION     LAKES    STREAMS     POLLUTION
WATER-POLLUTION     WATER-RESOURCES     WATER    NUTRIENT-CYCLE
HYDROLOGIC-BUDGET  WATER-QUALITY  SEDIMENT-YI ELD LAND-USE MODELS
SOIL-SURVEYS  NUTRIENTS  SEDIMENTS  RUNOFF WATERSHEDS

PROGRESS:77/01   77/12
  The  forested watershed was  closed out  in  the  spring   of   IS//
after  three years  of data  accumulation.    Watershed monitoring
and data collection  continued on the   agricultrual watershed.
although,    due  to  extremely  dry conditions  going  into  1977.
 there  was almost  no  snowmelt  runoff   and   rainfall  from   only
 three  rainfall  events.    Data analysis from  both  watersheds is
underway and will   be   used  to  develop   water   and   nutrient
budgets for the watersheds.   relate  water  quality and  sediment
yield to land use practices,   and to  provide  test  data  for
 watershed modeling.

 PUBL1CATIONS:77/01   77/12
  NO PUBLICATIONS REPORTED THIS PERIOD.

-------
DIALOG File60: USOA/CR1S 75-79/DEC (Item   11 of   28) User 2691 lljanBO
                                                                                                                             2403
0060255
AGENCY: CSRS  OHO
PERIOD: 01 JUL 75 TO so SEP 79
INVLST: FORSTER  D L
PROJECT*:  OH000539
PERF ORG:  AGRI ECONOMICS & RURAL SOCIOL
LOCATION:  OHIO AGRICULTURAL R AND D CENTER
          COLUMBUS   OHO

ECONOMIC  ANALYSIS  OF  THE  CONTROL  OF  WATER  POLLUTION  IN
AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION

OBJECTIVES:   Investigate  alternative  methods  of  disposing
municipal   and  feedlot waste on agricultural land,  determine
economic optimum allocation of resources for the  disposal  of
feeulot  and municipal wastes on agricultural lands,   evaluate
alternative policy mechanisms to be used  in  the  control  of
water pollution from feedlot and municipal waste disposal.

APPROACH:  Identify and evaluate the cost structure of disposal
techno Iogies   and   identify  the  effects  of  the   disposal
technologies on the characteristics of  waste.    Identify  the
input/output  relationship between waste and crop  production.
Determine economic optimum waste disposal systems and rates of
application  for  farmers   and   municipalities^     Evaluate
alternative  mechanisms to control water pollution from animal
and municipal wastes.

KEYWORDS:  COSTS CROP-PliODUCTION INPUT-OUTPUT-ANALYSIS POLICIES
LAND-DISPOSAL APPLICATION-RATE RESOURCE-ALLOCATION ANIMAL-WAS-
TE  MUNICIPAL-WASTE  WASTE-DISPOSAL  WATER-POLLUTION    MANURES
ALTERNATIVES FARM-MANAGEMENT SLUDGE ECONOMICS

PROGHESS:78/01  78/12
 The   focus  of  this  research  is  on  three  separate areas:
livestock waste disposal,  1andspreading sewage  sludge,   and
non-point pollution control.   In the livestock wai.te disposal
area,   work  was  completed  which  describes   and   analy/es
alternative  systems  used  to  handle  waste  from  livestock
facilities.   Some of the conclusions from the  study  are,   a)
substantial economies of size are present for nearly  all 'Maste
disposal systems; b) waste management costa are substantial to
producers  and vary widely between waste disposal systems;  c)
waste  is a source of plant nutrients and benefits  from  these
nutrients  accrue  to the producer;  and d)  a  large  number of
waste  nanagemont technologies are available to   control  'later
pollution   and   odor;    thus,   design  standards   to  meet
environmental goals are  Impractical.    The  second   area  of
study,  landspreading of sewage sludge,  focuses primarily on a
four city sludge landspreading demonstration  project.     This
demonstration  porject is a muIti-discip1inary  effort aimed at
demonstrating acceptable management systems  in  landspreading
sewage sludge.  A computer algorithm  is available to  recommend
appropriate  sludge  application  rates for Individual  farmers
and to value the benefits of sludge for these  farmers.    The
third  area  of  research,   non-point  pollution control,  is
concerned with the economic impacts of reducing soil   loss   in
the  Lake  Erie Basin.   One study investigates the effects  of
reducing soil loss in the Honey Creek Watershed.

PUBLICATIONS:78/01  78/12
 FORSTER, D.L. and BECKER, G.S. 1979. Costs and ln,-ome affects
    of alternative erosion control strategies: The Honey Creek
    Watershed. North Central Journal  of Agricultural Economics
1978.   Landsprading an alternative
 American  Journa I  of Agricultural
 OTT, S. and FORSTER,  D.L.
    for  sludge  disposal.
    Economics G0:555-b50.
 FORSTER, D.L.  1978. Economic comparisons of alternative waste
    management  systems for swine and  d.iiry.   American  Dairy
    Science   Association   annual  meetings.   East  Lansing,
    Mi chi gan.
 FORSTER,  D.L.  1978.  Economic impacts of  changing  tillage
    practices in the Lake Erie Basin. Technical Report Series.
    U.S. Army Engineer District, Buffalo, N.Y.
 FORSTER,   D.L.   1978.  Higher energy prices,  where are they
    leading agriculture.
 Ohio Soil  and  Water Conservation Districts  annual  meetings,
    Columbus, Ohio.

-------
DIALOG FlleBO: USDA/CRIS 75-79/DEC (Hen,    8 of   28) User 2691 11JanBO
                                                                                                                              2400
0071887
AGENCY: SAES  NY.C
PERIOD: as OCT 76 TO so SEP 79
INVEST: WALTER  M E; STEENHUIS  T s; LOEHR
PROJECT*: NYC-1 23379
PERF ORG: AGIH ENGINEERING
LOCATION: CORNELL UNIV
          ITHACA    NY
EFFECTIVENESS  OF   SOIL  AND  WATER CONSERVATION PRACTICES  FOR
POLLUTION CONTROL
OBJECTIVES:   Evaluate  the  impacts   of   soil   and
conservation  practices  (SWCP)   on nonpoint source poll ut,
     non-irrigated cropland agriculture  m  the  Easte. n
     "    the  cost-effectiveness  of  SWCP  in  preventing or
                  source water pollution.  Assess the
                      and costs of implementing SWCP.
    ute
reducing nonpolnt
environmental impacts
                                                           U.S.
                                                       mdirect
APPROACH:  First develop a general methodology  for  estmating
the  envirOiunontal  or  economic parameters of interest.   I he
second step is to apply the methodologies to examples or crises
of Tnleres?,  using'avai > ab, e data from previous and  on-«o,no
studies.    The  basic  unit  of ana I ys i s w. I I bea so i /cover
complex-  i.e.,  a  field-size plot with homogenebu-i  soil  and
p°a    cover  characteristics.   Pollutant  losses v, , 1   thus be
•edge-of-fleld-  and cost analyses will be  partial rather  than
full  farm or regional budgets.   Project Phasing:   Phase l
development of  the  technical   information   (pollutant   losses.
          .)  and methods needed  to evaluate  the effectiveness
          in  controlling   nonpolnt  source  po I 1 ut i on   f or HI
son/cover complexes.   Phase  II -  cost-ef f ec t i veness of S.WCP .
This will include systematic   evaluation  of  comb. nat .Oho  of
SWCP, pollutant  transport and indirect impacts.

KEYWORDS: ESTIMATES ECONOMICS METHODOLOGY ENVIRONMENTAL-IMPACT
EVALUATION    TRANSPORT   ENGINEERING  COST-EFFECT I VtNESS COSTS
WATER-CONSERVATION   IMPACT   NON-POINT-POLLUTION    CONSERVATION
POLLUTION PLANNING  WATER-QUALITY  WATER-POLLUTION  SOI L-CONbL-RV-
AT10N
 coss  ec.
 of  SWCP
                          had   indicated   that   soil   and   ,«ter
 conservation  practices  can be  effective  mean,  of   con , ro llmg
 water   oollution  associated  with  sediment  and  pollutants  which
 are  strongly  adsorbed to sediment  (e.g..  DDT).    The practices
 may  be  considerably  -ess  effective  in controlling poll., .on
 due  to dissolved  chemicals  (nitrates)  or  moderately  ads< , bed
 chemicals  (most  pesticides  currently  .n use).    Cost ana yses
  indicate that except for terracing  and   sod-based  ro tat ons
 most  soil   and water conservation pract.ces  are not likely to
  significantly increase former costs.

  PUBLICATIONS:77/01  77/12            U.ITIJ  n  .   1077    Soil
   WALTER  M. f., STEENHUIS.  T.S.,  and HAITH. D. A.  1977.   So I
      and'waier conservation practices  for  pollution  control.
                                                                       Amer.
                                                                             Soc. of Agr. Engineers  Paper  No.  77-2506.

-------
 DIALOG File60: USDA/CRIS 75-79/DEC (Item  167 of  263) User 2691 IBjanBO
                                                                                                                               318
 0043388
 AGENCY: ARS  3305
 PERIOD: 12 OCT 76 TO 12 OCT ai
 INVEST: OWEN  L B; EDWARDS  w M
 PROJECT*:  3305-20790-001
 PERF ORG:  USDA-ARS N APPALACHIAN EXP
 LOCATION:  WATERSHED RESEARCH
           COSHOCTON   OHO

 RELATION  OF  AGRICULTURAL  PRACTICE TO WATER QUALITY IN NORTH
 APPALACHIAN REGION

 OBJECTIVES:  Bolter define the significance  of   fertilizer  *
 pesticide   treatments   associated with beef-cattle  production
 on downstream water quality.
 APPROACH:    Measure
 pesticide   residues
 sediments,   4  spring waters &  relate
 treat.nents.    Treat pasture watersheds
 nitrogen fertilizer,   grass species &
 plus   alternate  winter  occupancy.
 quality  to  antecedent soil  moisture,
concentrations  of  plant    nutrients   &
in   samples  of  soil,  plants,   runoff,
        &  relate to  chemical  management
                  with different  rates ot
                  gazing  concentrations.
                  Relate  runoff  amount &
                 surface roughness,   soil
 compaction.     rainfall    &     cattle   management.     Evaluate
 persistence  &   runoff  transport  of  herbicides & *  insecticides
 protecting corn &  meadow crops,   following surface application
 on  watersheds  & 1ysimeters.   Use findings to develop &  refine
 hydro-chemical  models.

 KEYWORDS:    ANIMAL-WASTE  NON-POINT-POLLUTION GRAZING  PASTURES
 MODELS  TRANSPORT WATER-QUALITY  PHOSPHORUS NITROGEN GROUNDWATER
 SURFACE-WATER    INSECTICIDES    PESTICIDES   WATERSHEDS   WATER
 POLLUTION    SEDIMENTS    WATER-POLLUTION   FERTILIZERS   RUNOFF
 WATERSHED-MANAGEMENT EUTROPH1CATION

 PROr.RESS:77/01   77/12
 The  pathway   and  amount  of   chemicals   transported   from
 watersheds were affected by different pasture feeding systems.
 For the pasture used for winter  feeding,  significant chemical
 sediment transport occurred over the surface  flow.   but  the
 chemical   concentrations   did   not   exceed  water  quality
 standards.   Little  impairment to water quality occurred on the
 pastures used only for summer graz-ng.    The  persistence  of
 prominent  herbicides  were   studied  under  field conditions.
 Atrazine  and   simazine   under   conventional   and   no-tillago
 managenent,   degraded   through   3  or A ha If-lines during the
 160-day growing season.   Degradation rates were  consistently
 high  during  the  warm  months and slowed markedly under cool,
 fall temperatures.    Under similar soil pH conditions,    there
 was  no  consistent  effect  of  surface mulch on the herbicide
 degradation rate.   On 0.4 to 3.5 ha agricultural  watersheds.
 hignest  concentrations  of  atrazine (0.48 ppm)  and siimizine
 (1.2  ppm)    were  present  in   runoff  occurring  soon  after
application  and declined rapidly for later events.   A  maximum
of  6%  and an average of about 2%  of the  applied  herbicides
were  transported  in  the runoff.   Less runoff and herbicide
loss occurred from no-tillage than from  conventionally-tilled
corn.    Herbicide  concentration in runoff was predicted from
data on days after application and a tillage times
rate.   Proper  management  of  herbicide
information on probable transport in
                                                                                         use
                                                                                   runoff.
                                                                                                 applicat ion
                                                                                              requires  such
                                              PU8LICATIONS:77/01  77/12
                                               CHICHESIER. F.H. 1977.  Effects of increased fertilizer rates
                                                  on nitrogen content of runoff and percolate from  monolith
                                                  Iysimeters. Journal of Environmental Quality G(2)'2I1-217
                                               OWENS.   L.B..   NELSON.   D.W.   and  SOMMEHS.   L.E.  197?!
                                                  Determination of inorganic phosphorus In oxalate  extracts
                                                  of soils. Soil Scl. Soc. Am. J. Vol. 41. No. 1. Jan.-Feb.

-------
                                                                                                                               *? 1 7
DIALOG File60: USDA/CRIS 75-79/DEC (Item  166 of  263) User 2fi£1  IBJanOO



0043423
AGENCY: ARS  3305
PERIOD: 12 OCT 76 TO 12 OCT 79
INVC.ST : EDWARDS  W M
PROJECT*:  3305-20790-002
PERF ORG:  USDA-ARS N APPALACHIAN EXP
LOCATION:  WATERSHED RESEARCH
          COSHOCTON   OHO

MANAGEMENT OF WASTES AND WASTE WATERS FROM SMALL FEEDLOTS

OBJECTIVLS°. Determine the amounts and concentrations of animal
wasios  in  runoff  from  small  cattIc-confiiiouent operations
typical of the Eastern U.S.   Evaluate effects  on  downstream
water  quality from runoff management systems below the lots a
from manure spreading.

APPROACH:   Evaluate runoff quality from a 30-cow herd wintered
on  a  high-roughage  ration  in  an unpavecl barnlot &  from <\
50-itoor  fattening operation  in a paved feedlot. Study effects
of  lot management &  runoff management  treatments  below   the
lots.   Measure  i   sample   runoff Immediately below:   Lots,
settling  ba-oliis,  different lengths  of  grassed  ,/ateruays  &
small  watersheds  whore  manure  is applied.    Relate nutrient
transport  to management practices & use results "plus  long-term
hydrologic records to  improve water-quality  models.

KEYWORDS:   BARNYARDS  MODELS  HYDROLOGY    NUTRIENT-TRANSPORT
CONFINEMENT   WASTE-WATER   CATTLE   MANURES  hASlE-MANAGEMENT
WATER-QUALITY  SURFACE-WATER  AN IMAL-V. ASTE   WATERSrlEDS   WATER
FEEDI.OTS  WATER-POLLUTION RUNOFF

PROGRESS:77/01   77/12
 Construction  was  completed on  feedlot  (2650  sq.   ft.)   with
addition  of a concrete wanure push-off; on  settling basin  (300
ft.).   including a semi-automatic gate  for  release of   feecllot
effluent   after  settling  of solids;   and  on two grass  filter
strips (I51   x  100').    Each  of  these  four  units   were
instrunented  for measuring and  sampling runoff.   Sampling and
analysis  has  begun.    The parameters  initially  being   measured
are:  total solids, total N.   N0(3). -N,   NH(4)..  -N.   soluble-
(ortho) P, total P, soluble K,  COD, Total C,  inorganic  C,   and
BOD.

PUBLICATIONS:77/01  77/12
 NO PUBLICATIONS REPORTED  THIS  PERIOD.

-------
 DIALOG Flle60: USDA/CRIS  75-79/DEC  (Item  164 of  263) User 2691  18JanBO
                                                                                                                                315
 0043733
 AGENCY: ARS  3505
 PERIOD: 03 MAY 77 TO 03 MAY 82
 INVtST: YOUNG  R A; HOLT  R F
 PROJECT*: 3505-20790-006
 PERF ORG: USDA-ARS POLLUTION SEROSION RE
           S
 LOCATION: NC SOIL CONSERVATION RES LAB
           MORRIS   MIN

 EFFECT OF ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS ON RUNOFF.
 AND WATER
              YOUNG. R. A.  AND  R.  F.  HOLT.   Effect of  winter applied manure
                 on annual  runoff,  erosion,   and nutrient  movement.   Jour.
                 Soil and Water Conserv.  32  (1977):219-222.
EROSION,
 OQJLCTIVES:   Determine the  effect  of  various  animal  >««3to
 inan.,geiient  systems  on quality and quantity of surface runoff
 and soil  loss.    Evaluate the  ability  of  various  land  and
 cropping   treatments to absorb and retain pollutants in runoff
 from livestock  feedlols.    Evaluate the effectiveness of these
 land  treatments  in  controlling  the discharge of pollutants
 from a livestock feedlot  under spring snow melt conditions.

 APPROACH:  Use  simulated  and natural  rainfall  to induce runoff
 and erosion  on  standai-d runoff plots  and four  small  watersheds
 2   to 4 acres  in size.    Both runoff  plots and watersheds will
 be  fully  instrumented to  measure and   sample  soil   and  ^/ater
 losses.    Systems   to be tested will  be disposal of  manure  on
 frozen ground at  different  times during the winter.   different
 rates of  manure application,   and various cropping  treatments
 below feedlots  to  absorb and retain  pollutants in  runoff.

 KEYWORDS:    CONTROL   MANAGEMENT  CROPPING-SYSTEMS    ABSORPTION
 WIN1ER WASTE-DISPOSAL  LAND-APPLICATION  MEASUREMENT  RAINFALL
 SOIL-LOSS    SOILS   POLLUTION     fEEDLOTS    EROSION     RUNOFF
 WASTE-MANAGEMENT  WATER-QUALITY MANURES  ANIMAL-WASTE

 PROGI(ESS:77/01   77/12
 Duo   to extremely dry  soil  conditions  going into 1977,   there
 was  very little  snoiume I t  runoff  from  plots  to  which   0.33",
 0.7',  and  1.1"   of dairy  manure  had been applied in midwinter.'
 Relative amounts  of  runoff,  however,   were  the same as  in the
 two   previous  years  with   the  check plot having the greatest
 runoff and the two heaviest  manure  applications  having  the
 least.     Four   small watersheds,  2 to  4  acres  in size,  were
 treated with the  same manure applications  in midwinter as  the
 runoff plots.  Again,   the  lest  amount of  runoff from sno/melt
 or sunnier  rainfall was  from  the   2  acres  with  the  highest
 manure applications.  Three different cropping  treatments were
 tested under simulated  rainfall  to determine their ability  to
 absorb  and retain pollutants  in runoff.   Runoff and sediment
 were  reduced 80%  and 93%,  respectively.  by passing from the
 feedlot through 90 feet of vegetated buffer strip.    TN and TP
were  reduced 70% and 73%,   respectively.   There was also of  a
significant reduction in  the movement  of coliform organisms in
 the feedlot as it passed  through the vegetated buffer strips.

PUBLICATIONS:77/01  77/12

-------
DIALOG Flle60: USDA/CR1S 75-79/DEC (Item   49 of   263)  User 26£1  IBJanBO
                                                                                                                              221
0068692
AGENCY: CSRS  OHO
PERIOD: 01 JUL 75 TO 30 JUN uo
INVEST: VAN KEUREN  R w; OWENS  L B; WHITE
PROJECT*: OH000545
PERF ORG: AGRONOMY
LOCATION: OHIO AGRIC RES AND DEVLP CENTER
          WOOSTER   OHO

WATER QUALITY AFFECTED BY CROP CULTURE AND ANIMAL OCCUPANCY

OBJECTIVES:   Determine pretreatment levels of N,  P,  K,  Cl,
pesticides,  sediment BOD.  COD,  TVS,  TOC  from  watersheds.
Determine  post-treatment  levels of some materials from summer
and  winter  pastures,   barnlots,   and  cropped  watersheds.
Compare   the  effectivenes  of  pasture  management  systems,
barnlot  runoff   handling   systems   and  cropping  systems  for
maintenance of water quality.

APPROACH:   Instrumented watersheds  will be used  to measure and
sample  runoff and  ground   water   from  beef  cattle  pastures.
barnlots.   and  cropping   systems.    Water   samples  will  be
analyzed as appropriate  to determine water quality.

KEYWORDS: QUALITY-MAINTENANCE  WATER GROUNDWATER' CROPPING-SYST-
EMS  PASTURES  RUNOFF OXYGEN-DEMAND   WATER-POLLUTION   WATERSHEDS
WATER-QUALITY  ANIMAL-WASTE NITROGEN PHOSPHORUS PASTURE-MANAGE-
MENT POTASSIUM  CHLORINE  PESTICIDES

 PROGRESS:78/01   78/12
  Smill  watersheds  (.25  to  3 ha)   were  used  in  a summer grazing
 (May-Nov.)   and winter  feeding (Nov.-May)    program   for  beef
 cows.     The   levels  of   N fertiI'zation  used were  56 and 22*
 kg/ha/yr     Water  flow   measurements  were  made   for    each
 watershed    and   chemical   analyses   were    performed   on
 precipitation,   surface runoff and sediment,    and   subsurface
 water samples.    Data from the 1974-77 study period  show N an.1
 P losses ranging from  16  to  34  Kg/ha/yr   and  0.5  to  2.b
 kg/ha/yr, respectively.  Approximately 00% of  the N  and  67^ of
 the  P  was  lost   during  the  November through April  period.
 These preliminary results indicate that N and  P  losses  were
 negligible  during  the  summer  grazing  period.   During the
 winter feeding period  when  cattle  were  concentrated  in  a
 smaller  area and  for longer periods and when there was '1tll<:
 or no vegetative growth,  N and P  losses were higher.  with  P
 losses  much  smaller  than  N  losses.    N was lost in --ater
 running off the surface and in water than filtered  through the
 soil (subsurface  flow).  When the  greatest   losses  occurred
 most of the nutrients  lost came off in the surface  water.  but
 at  these times.   soil erosion  was  almost  nonexistent.     It
 appears   that    cattle   grazing  managed  pastures  are  not
 contributing  significantly   to  surface   or   ground   'later
 pollut ion.
                                                                       of medium and high fertility  small  pastured  watersheds.
                                                                       Amer. Soc. Agron. Abst.:33. Chicago. IL. Dec. 3-0. 1978.
  PUBL1CAT10NS-.78/01   78/12
  OWENS.  L.B.  and  VAN KEUREN.  R.W.
1978.   Water quality aspects

-------
 DIALOG File60: USDA/CRIS 75-79/DEC  (Item   48 of  263) User 2CS1 18jan80
                                                                                                                                220
 0060970
 AGENCY: CSRS  wis
 PERIOD: 30 SEP 75 TO 30 SEP 79
 INVEST: DANIEL  T c; PETERSON  j o; POWELL  R D
 PROJECT*: WIS05112
 PERF ORG: SOIL SCIENCE
 LOCATION: UNIV OF WISCONSIN
           MADISON   WIS

 DEVELOPMENT  AND  DEMONSTRATION OF METHODOLOGY FOR THE CONTROL
 OF BARNYARD EFFLUENT

 OBJECTIVES:  Develop and demonstrate on  selected  soil   types
 cost-effective   methodology  for  controlling  nutrients  and
 sediment in runoff  water  from  barnyards,    rest  areas  and
 feedlots associated with 40 to 100 cow dairy operations.

 APPROACH:  Study involves research and extension personnel  from
 the  University  as  well   as   representatives  of  the   state
 regulatory agency (DNR) and the Federal  agency responsible  for
                    with  conservation  practices  (ASCS/USDA).
                   county Extension and SCS-ASCS personnel will
                   Monitoring will  quantify water,  nutrient  and
                   before  and   after  control   methodology   is
 designed  and  installed  to   assess the effectiveness of  the
 control   measures.     Laboratory   analyses   will   be   made   to
 determine    species    of  nitrogen.    phosphorus,   chlorides,
 electrical   conductivity,    oxidant  demand    and    residue.
 Cost/benefit   analyses   will   weigh   the  effectiveness of  the
 abatement  methodology  vis-a-vis  improvements  in  water
 and economic  effects on fanners.
                                                                    PUBLICATIONS!76/01   76/12
                                                                    NO  PUBLICATIONS  REPORTED  THIS  PERIOD.
           age
assisting farmers
Local   farmers,
also participate.
sediment  movement
                                                       qua Ii t y
 KEYWORDS:      ELECTRICAL-CONDUCTIVITY   ECONOMICS   SOIL-IYPES
 OXIDANTS  NITROGEN  CHLORIDES   POLLUTION-ABATEMENT  PHOSPHORUS
 SEDIMENTS RUNOFF DAIRY-CATTLE WATER-QUALITY NUIRIENTS FEEDLOTS
 ANIMAL-WASTE   WATER-POLLUTION COST-BENEFIT-ANALYSIS MONITORING
 METHODOLOGY EFFLUENTS

 PROGRESS:76/01  76/12
 The Barnyard  Effluent Project  was  set  up  to  evaluate  the
 effectiveness  of  various  management techniques for reducing
 the outflow of sediments  and   nutrients  from  barnyards  and
 feedlots  commonly associated with Wisconsin dairy operations.
 During spring  runoff samples  were  collected  from  the  five
 monitoring  sites  which  had   been established in the Fall  of
 1975.  Generally speaking, rainfall ceased statewide after the
 16th of May so only a very few  samples were  collected  during
 the  summer  and  fall  months.    It was determined by project
 personnel that because of the lack  of  good  background  data
 (due  to  the  lack  of  rainfall)   that   all   sites would  be
maintained as untreated through the Spring of  1977  at   "/hidi
 time management practices would be installed.  Management plans
were developed for each barnyard site.  In the  Fall  of 1976  an
additional   site  was  added  on coarse sandy soils in Waupaca
County in accordance with the project  plan.

-------
DIALOG FileGO: USDA/CRIS 75-79/DEC (Item   42 of   263)  User 2691  IBjanBO
                                                                                                                              214
0069209
AGENCY: SAGS  MICL
PERIOD: 02 SEP 75 TO 01 SEP oo
INVEST: LOUDON  T L
PROJECT*: MICL03142
PERF ORG: AuMl ENGINEERING
LOCATION: MICHIGAN STATE UNIV
          EAST LANSING   MIC

LAND APPLICATION OF ANIMAL WASTE

OBJECTIVES:   Apply  animal  wastes  of  known  composition to
agricultural soils.   Evaluate crop response to waste  applied
In   various  quantities  and  at  various  times.    Identify
satisfactory methods of applying liquid waste to growing crops
through  irrigation systems.   Identify  practices  which  will
minimize  water pollution resulting from application of animal
wasle  to  frozen soil.
APPROACH:
nuti- ient
           Liquid swine  arid  dairy  waste  are  analyzed  for
           content   and  applied  to  growing  crops  through
irrigation  systems  with  application   rate,    amount   and
distribution  measured.   Crop response is monitored by visual
observations and final yield.   Various  types  of  irrigation
equipment  are  being  tried.    Plots 400 ft. in area receive
bedded dairy  manure  during  wintor  months.     Various  soil
surface   conditions   are   included.    Runoff  is  monitored
quantitatively and qualitatively at  intervals down 3-5X slopes
for up to 200 ft.

KEYWORDS:   MANURE  LAND-APPLICATION  WATER-POLLUTION   RUNOFF
IRRIGATION ANIMAL-WASTE WASTE-DISPOSAL SOILS WASTE-UTILIZATION
LIQUID-MANURES LIQUID-WASTE  WINTER FROZEN-SOILS NUIRIENT-CONT-
ENT APPLICATION-RATE NUTRIENT-LOSSES CROP-RESPONSE PLANT-RESP-
ONSE
                                                                  significant  difference   in   background   runoff   quality  among
                                                                  control P'ots  of  the  three surface conditions.     The  project
                                                                  has   been  expanded   to   look  at  the influence  of  buffer area
                                                                  associated with  field scale  livestock waste spreading.     This
                                                                  type   of  information  is  needed for non-point  pollution  control
                                                                  pianning*

                                                                  PUBLICATIONS:77/01  77/12
                                                                    THOMPSON. O.R.  (1977).  Nutrient Movement During Winter Runoff
                                                                       from  Manure   Treated  Plots.   unpublished  M.S.    Thesis,
                                                                       Agricultural    Engineering   Department.    Michigan  State
                                                                       University.
  	j:77/01   77/12
  Field  plot  runoff from manured and control  areas  was  sampled
 for  three different plot surface  conditions   during sno-jmelt
 and   spring  rainfall  events.     Runoff   was coI Itcted at  two
 locations downslope from the  manured  area.     Twelve   meters
 dpwnslope  from  the  manured area,   water quality  data show a
 high reduction  in nutrient concentration.   Runoff collected 34
 meters downslope was comparable to control-plot  quality-   For-
 grass, the data indicates that soluble nitrogen  and phosphorus
 forms  are  removed  more  readily  from  runoff  than materials
 which contribute to COD.  This is also true for   corn  stubble
 plot   surfaces.     Variation  in  concentrations   among  the
 different  surface  conditions   was   generally   small   and
 statistically  insignificant  at  sampling locations 34 meters
 down slope from the area  receiving  the   manure  application;
 however, significant differences in ammonia and  COD were noted
 within 'the  manured  area  for  different surface  conditions.
 Compared with other  surface  conditions.    a  shorter   buffer
 length  of  disked  corn  stubble  was  required to reduce all
 nutrient parameters  to  background  levels.     There  was  o-

-------
  DIALOG Flle60:  USOA/CRIS 75-79/DEC (Item   51  of   263,  User 2691  18Jan80
                                                                                                                                223
  0068255
  AGENCY:  CSRS   OHO
  PERIOD:  Ot  JUL 75 TO 30 SEP  79
  INVEST:  FORSTER   o u
  PROJECT*: OH000539
  PERF ORG: AGHI  ECONOMICS & RURAL  SOCIOL
  LOCATION: OHIO AGRICULTURAL  R AND D CENTER
           COLUMBUS   OHO
 OBJECTIVES:   Investigate  alternative  methods  of  disposing
 municipal  and  feedlot waste on agricultural land.  d«te«ni ne
 economic optimum allocation of resources for the  disposal  of
 feedlot  and municipal wastes on agricultural land*,  evaluate
 alternative policy mechanisms to be used  in  the  control  of
 water pollution from feedlot and municipal  waste disposal.

 APPROACH: Identify and evaluate the cost structure of disposal
 techno ogies   and   identify  the  effects  of   the  disposal
 technologies on the characteristics of  waste.    Identify  the
 input/output  relationship between waste and crop  production
 Determine economic optimum waste disposal  systems and rates of
 application  for  farmers   and   municipalities.      Evaluate
 alternative  mechanisms to control  water pollution from animal
 and municipal  wastes.

 KEYWORDS:  COSTS  CROP-PRODUCTION INPUT-OUTPUT-ANALYSIS POLICIES
 LAND-DISPOSAL  APPLICATION-RATE  RESOURCE-ALLOCATION ANIMAL-WAS-
 TE   MUNICIPAL-WASTE  WASTE-DISPOSAL  WATER-POLLUTION   MANURES
 ALTERNATIVES FARM-MANAGEMENT  SLUDGE ECONOMICS          MANURES

 PROGRESS:78/01   78/12
 The  focus  of   this   research   is  on   three separate  areas:
 livestock  waste  disposal,   landspreading sewage   sludge.    and
 non-point  pollution control.    In  the  livestock  waste disposal
 area,   work   was   completed  which  describes   and   analyzes
 alternative  systems  used   to  handle   waste  from   livestock
 facilities.    Some  of the conclusions  from the study are    a)
 substantial  economies of size are present for nearly all  *aste
 disposal systems; b) waste management costa are  substantial to
 producers  and vary widely between  waste disposal systems'  c)
 waste  is a source of plant nutrients and benefits  from   these
 nutrients  accrue   to the producer;  and d)  a |arc,e number of
 waste .nanagement technologies are available to  control   vater
 pollution   and   odor;    thus,    design  standards  to  meet
 environmental goals are  impractical.    The  second  area  of
 study,  landspreading of sewage sludge.   focuses primarily on a
 four city sludge landspreading demonstration  prouct.    This
demonstration  porject  is a n.ul t i -di scipl inary effort aimed at
demonstrating acceptable management systems  in  landspreading
sewage sludge.   A computer algorithm is available to reco ...... end
appropriate  sludge  application  rates for  individual farmers
and to value the benefits of sludge for these  farmers.     The
third  area  of  research.    non-point  pol I ut ion control ,  i -,
concerned with the economic  impacts of reducing  son   loss   in
the  Lake  Erie Basin.   One study Investigates  the effects  of
reducing soil loss in the Honey Creek Watershed.    effect*  of

PUBLICATIONS:78/OI  78/12
 FORSTER  D.L. and BECKER. G.S. 1979. Costs nnd  income affects
    2L UhArt M™ enosion c°ntrol strategies: The Honey Creek
    Watershed. North Centra. Journal  of Agricultural Economics

 OTT'  S"  aild°RSTER>  D-U  '97B-   "-andsprading an alternative
                        .
 FORSTER.  D.L.  1978.  Economic comparisons of alternative waste
    manj-jcmont  systems for swine and  dairy.   Aroeric.n
 FORSTER,   D.L.   1978.   Economic impacts of  changing  tillage
    practices  ,n  the  Lake  Erie Basin.  Technical  Report Series
    U.S. Army  Engineer  District,  Buffalo,  N Y
                               °"  Districts   annual   meetings.

-------
DIALOG Flle60: USDA/CRIS 75-79/DEC (Item   65 of   263)  User 2661  18jan80
0065448
AGENCY: CSRS  wis
PERIOD: 01 OCT 78 TO 30 SEP 8i
INVEST: BUBENZER  G o
PROJECT*: WIS05090
PERF ORG: AGRI ENGINEERING
LOCATION: UNIV OF WISCONSIN
          MADISON   WIS
SEDIMENT SOURCE AREA DETERMINATION USING CESIUM 137
OBJECTIVES:
137-sccliment
erosin  rules
balances  fop
  Investigate   the   mechanics   of   the  Cesiur.i
erosion process in order to predict more reliably
from Cesium 137 observations.    Dc-velop  sediment
small watersheds using Cesium 137 levels.
 APPROACH"    Tilled  and  unt i I I ed  plots  wi 1 1  be  establ i shed  to
 stud?  the   mechanics  of   the   Cesium   137-sediment   transport
 process     Rill   patterns will  be imposed on a  portion of  the
 P?ms?   Sediment and Cesium loss  will  be  determ.ned  for  the
 two  tillage  conditions  and type  of erosion  pattern deveoped
 on the pots    Cesium  137  and  sediment balances  will   be
 developed  for seven small agricultural  watershed,    Sedunent
 yie\d estimates will be made for each  of the  watersheds  based
 upon  the  loss of cesium 137.    The  est imatecT sediment y i e I ds
 wm be compared with the sediment trapped in the  farm  ponds
 at the outlets of the watersheds.

 KEYWORDS'    WATERSHEDS  SEDIMENTS  SEDIMENT-YIELD S°< L-
 RUNUFF CESIUM SOIL-LOSS MECHANICS  EROSION  SEDIMENT-
 TILLAGE SEDIMENT-TRAPS RADIOISOTOPES


                  o^'ldiments  on an agricultural watershed  in

                         and*^^
 has   been  established   for  the  watershed based  upon  -a,ured
 concentration  levels  and  land use patterns.   soil   Cesium  u/
 levels  were  u-arsh  greater   than forest  greater than  pas ure
 greater than  cultivated  land.   Excluding  natural  decay.   . t  i s
 Lifted   that   94%   of   the   Cesium-137   deposited  on  the
 waterthed  is  still  within the  watershed.   "s^-137 Jeve  s  «„
 the  marsh  indicate  that the  marsh is  acting as  a filtei  and
 deposition area  which prevents  fine   sediments   '™™  '"^J^
 the take.   There is little evidence of  a  bu.ldup  ol  Ces.u.n  13
  in the lake.    Within the cultivated  area,   Cesium- 137  >CVV"

                                                appro imite,   ,
   or Cesium-137 analysis.  All watersheds drain into farm ponds
  with very high trap efficiencies.    Cesium-137  samples  have
  been collected from the watersheds and ponds ana
  being  analyzed.    Erosion  rates and sediment
                                                                   correlated to land use.
                                                                       an,   J.C.   1077.    Estimating
                                                          erosion losses from fallout Cesium-137  measurements.
                                                          of  Sym. Sedimentation of Inland Waters.
                                                       Int.  Assoc.  of Sci.  Hydr. Paris, France.
                                                                                                                              233
f lei J
Proc.

-------
        DIALOG  Flle60:  USDA/CHIS 75-79/DEC (Item   113  of   263)  User  2691  lajanBO
                                                                                                                                      277
-P-
oo
 OOC03G2
 AGENCY: CSRS  IND
 PERIOD: 01  JUL 71 TO 30 SEP ei
 INVEST: WHEATON  R z
 PROJECT*:  IND046029
 PERF  ORG:  AGRI ENGINEERING
 LOCATION:  PURDUE UNIV
           LAFAYETTE   IND

 WATER MANAGEMENT IN A RURAL-URBAN  COMMUNITY

 OBJECTIVES:     Apply   conservation    measures   to   the   land.
 Determine  the  effects of  these  measures on   the   runoff   -later
 quality.     Dot ermine  in so far as  is posalble  the  eourcoa  of
 the pollutants which are  measured  in  Number   2.    Learn   what
 factors  encourage  or  prevent   land owners   from  applying
 conservation measures to   the   land.    Evaluate  the  various
 methods for  stabilization of  stream channels.

 APPROACH:    Soil   conservation  measures  will be designed and
 installed.   Stream gauging and stream sampling sites  will   bo
 established.      The  water analysis  will   be  made  in  the
 laboratory.  Insofar as possible pollutants  identified will  be
 traced  to find their source.    Subsurface drainage plans   will
 be analyzed  to determine  their  contribution.  Land owners  will
 be  surveyed   to   determine their  attitudes adbut the  need for
 soil  conservation.     Various   vegetative   and   mechanical
 approaches   to stabilize  stream channels will be  installed and
 studied  to determine their  effectiveness.

 KEYWORDS:      WATER     WATER-ANALYSIS     SUBSURFACE-DRAINAGE
 STABILIZATION  SOURCES  CHANNELS-(WATERCOURSES) CHANNEL-STAU1LI-
 ZATION  ENGINEERING  RUNOFF STREAM-FLOW-RECORDS DRAINAGE-SYSTEMS
 CONSERVATION WATER-QUALITY  EROSION SEDIMENTATION WATER-POLLUT-
 ION SOIL-CONSERVATION  POLLUTANTS

 PROGRESS:78/01   78/12
 The    second   phase   of  the  project   which  involves  the
 application of  Land  Treatment  Measures  came  to  an  end   in
October  of  1977.   Monitoring  for  water  quality evaluation  is.
              Also,  more detailed  monitoring to evaluate  the
               individual  practices  has   been  initiated
             being  installed.   The year  1978 was a   very
             most  no  water  samples  were obtained  after
        Spring  storms.   Of additional interest   is   the
          pract ices   in
       cont i nu i ng.
       effect    of
       equipment is
       year   and  a
       initial
       owners'
                                keeping,    (nstalI ing  add!tional.
 and
 dry
 the
land
  or
       plowing  up  some  of   the  land  treatment   measures   that   wore
       installed  in  Phase 2.   All  the contracts  with  the  land o-vners
       for  the  installation of materials  have  expired,   therefore the
       results   of    their   activities   may  be  very  valuable  in
       determining what  may  happen  when  208   Plans   start  to  be
       implemented.    A  review in  the  Fall  of  1978  indicated  that  the
       original  practices  as installed are being  maintained.     There
       does   not   seem   to  be  an   additional  land   treatment  being
       installed now  that  the   promotional   activities   have   ceased.
       There  does appear  however,   to  be a  need  for an educational
                                                                           program to encourage maintenance of the various measures.

                                                                           PUBLICATIONS:78/OI   78/12
                                                                            MORRISON.  J.  (Editor).  1978.  August.  Environmental Impact of
                                                                               Land   Use   on   Water   Quality  Project  Data.   EPA  -
                                                                               905/9-77-007C.  274 pages.

-------
DIALOG F1le60: USDA/CRIS 75-79/DEC (Item  129  of   263)  User  2091  IBjanOO
                                                                                                                              292
005RI59
AGENCY: CSRS  IND
PERIOD: 01 JUL 70 TO 30 SEP 80
INVEST: NELSON  o w
PROJECT*: 1ND050054A
PERF ORG: AGRONOMY
LOCATION: PURDUE UNIV
          LAFAYETTE   IND
ENVIRONMENTAL  ACCUMULATION
AND CROP MANAGEMENT
                             OF  NUTRIENTS AS AFFECTED BY SOIL
                                                           and
OBJECTIVES:  Evaluate tho contribution  of  soil  erosion
water  runoff   to  nitrogen and phosphorus enrichment of 'vater
resources;  seek management techniques  to   control  nutrient
enrichnent of sediments; evaluate the availability of nitrogen
and  phosphorus  associated  with  eroded  soil  materials  to
aquatic  organisms.

APPROACH!  A rainfall simulator will be used apply water at  a
specified  rate  and  intensity   to  fertilized  field  plots.
Samples  of  runoff  water  and   sediment  will  be  collected
throughout   each   rainstorm   and  subsequently  analyzed   for
nitrogen and phosphorus  components.   Factors  to be  evaluated
 in   the study  include soil  type,  soil slope.*   fertilizer  rate
and  form.  methods of fertilizer  application.   methods  of  soil
tillage    rate of  mulching.    and  intensity  and  duration of
simulated  rainstorm.    Based   on  data  obtained.    management
practices  which reduce  soil  nutrient  losses  in surface runoff
will  be developed  and tested.    Laboratory  incubation   studies
using algae   as  an  indicator organism will be established to
determine  the   availability  of   nutrients  attached  to   soil
particles  entering natural  waters through erosion.

 KEYWORDS:      WATER-QUALITY   AQUATIC-LIFE    ALGAE    NUTRIENTS
 FERTILIZER-RATES  MULCHING  WATER  MANAGEMENT   SOIL-MANAGLMENf
 RAINFALL      SEDIMENTS      SOIL-EROSION     RUNOFF     NITROGEN
 WATtR-RESOURCES   SOIL-TYPES   SLOPE     TILLAGE    FERTILIZERS
 NUTRIENT-LOSSES SOILS  NITROGEN PHOSPHORUS APPLICATION-METHODS

 PROGR£SS:7B/01   78/12
  Monitoring  studies  in  a 5000 ha watershed in Allen County,
 IN  continued.    Soil  and nutrient  losses during 1978 were low
 because of limited rainfall and runoff.   Laboratory studies of
 the  avilability of P in the suspended sediments in streams of
 the Black Creek Watershed established that  about 20%   of  tho
 total  sediment   P  and 30%  of the sediment  inorganic P -/ould
 ultimately be available to algal cells.   Phosphorus associated
 with anorphous  iron and aluminum in sediments was   the  source
 of  the  majority  of  P  assimilated  by  algal  cells  unda
 substantial proportion of  the P  (60%) present  in this  fraction
 was taken up by   algal   cells  during  a  2  week   incubation.
 Rainfall  simulator  trials   showed  that  (1)  surface runoff
 losses of animal  waste-derived nutrients (N and  P)    will  be
 high  if intense rainstorms occur soon after waste application,
 (2)   incorporation  of  applied  animal  wastes will  markedly
reduce nutrient losses in runoff. (3)  waste application tends
to  reduce soil loss because of a mulch effect,  (4)  sediment
eroded from animal waste-treated areas is highly enriched with
nutrients because of manure particles in  transported  solids.
and (5)  concentrations of soluble N and P compounds in runoff
from waste treated areas  are  high  enough  to  create  water
quality problems. /9-78-001. pp. 179-198.

PUBLICAT10NS:78/01  78/12
 DOR1CH. R.A.  and NELSON.  D.W.  1978.  AIgal ava,lab,I,ty of
    soluble and sediment phosphorous in drainage water of  the
    Black  Creek  Watershed.    In:   Voluntary  or  Regulatory
    Approaches to Nonpoint Pollution Control.  Proceedings of a
    USEPA

-------
      DIALOG Flle60: USDA/CRIS 75-79/DEC (Item  130 of  263) User 2691 18jan80
                                                                                                                                    293
Ln
O
      0057984
      AGENCY: CSRS  wis
      PERIOD: 01  JUL 70 TO so SEP eo
      INVEST: KECNEY  0 R; HARRIS  R
      PROJECT*:  WIS01722
      PERF ORG:  SOIL SCIENCE
      LOCATION:  UNIV OF WISCONSIN
                MADISON   WIS
      ENVIRONMENTAL  ACCUMULATION
      AND CROP MANAGEMENT
                              OF  NUTRIENTS AS AFFECTED BY SOIL
 OBJECTIVES:   Evaluate  the  nonpoint  sources  of   nutrients
 (primarily  N and P)  to waters and develop management systems
 that  .pinimize  nutrient  losses  and   thereby   reduce   the
 environmental   impact   of   man's  activities  and  maximize
 efficiency  of  resource  use.    Specific   objectives   are:
 Evaluate   agricultural    production   practices   controlling
 mobility and transport of N and P in soiI-plant-water systems.
 Develop management techniques to control   nutrient  enrichment
 of waters and maximize N and P fertilizer  use efficiency.

 APPROACH:      Determination    of   the   relative   phosphate
 intensity-capacity and  phosphate  uptake   characteristics  of
 soils  and  algal   cells will  be stressed.    factors affecting
 availability of  P  In  soil   runoff  will   be  evaluated as   a
 function  of  the   relative  rate  and extent   of inorganic P
 release  from  soil   particulates   and   uptake   by   algae.
 Managenent recommendations  on  the use of N-sei ve to increase N
 fertilizer    efficiency   and   reduce   N   losses   through
 den Itrification  and    I eachi fig  will   be   evaluated  in field
 trials  and periodic  sampling of  the  fertilizer  band.

 KEYWORDS:  NUTRIENT-UPTAKE NUTRI£NT-UPTAKE-(PLANTS)  ALGAE SOILS
 MANAGEMENT  FERTILIZERS   WATER  WATER-QUALITY   MATER-POLLUTION
 NITROGEN  RUNOFF  NUTRIENT-LOSSES   DENITRIFICATI0f4   LEACHING
 PHOSPHORUS EUTROPHICATION NITROGEN-TRANSFORMATIONS  NUTRIENT-T-
 RANSPORT

 PROGRESS:77/01   77/12
 Analyses   of  runoff  from  20   rainfal!-simulator   plots   in
 microwatersheds  with different  land  uses showed  highest  total
 P.    but   lowest soluble P concentrations were associated with
 row crops  and highest  soluble   P  but  lowest   total   P  with
 alfalfa  fields  after  frost  in October.   A routine method for
 estimating  "algal-available" P was developed.    in  this method
 a   1:1000   suspension  of the less  than  20Mu size fraciton of a
 soil  is  shaken for 24  hrs with a  20-40  mesh  cation  exchange
 resin containing adsorbed polynuclear complexes of hydroxy-AI.
 After a  sieve separation.  the P  adsorbed on the resin complex
 is determined. Resin extractable  P was  highly related (r equal
 to 0.98)  with algal extractable  P,  with mean values  of  162
Mug/g for resin, 169 Mug/g by algal extraction.  Field studies
with  Nitrapyrin   (NI)   have   shown   good   inhibition   of
nitrification on a silt  loam and a sandy soil.  However, in an
experiment  with   fall and spring applied anhydrous NH(3),   NI
                                                                    did not affect  yield or  N  uptake  by  corn.   Potato yields on  an
                                                                    irrigated  sand were  consitently   depressed  by  NI      This
                                                                    apparently was  due  to  the  excess  of  NH(4)    to   N0(3),    which
                                                                    interfered  with  plant  nutrition.    Laboratory studies  sho*tj
                                                                    that sorption to organic matter  is a major   factor   decreasing
                                                                    NI   effectiveness.    Chemical   hydrolysis   is  the dominant
                                                                    hydrolysis mechanism .ind is not affected by  PH  or sorption   to
                                                                    organic  surgaces.   but   decreases   with  water   content  and
                                                                    increases with  temperature.
                                                                                                              and WALSH,   L.M.   1977.
                                                                                                              in  irrigated  sands with
                                                                                                                Agron.
PUBLICATIONS:77/01  77/12
 HENDRICKSON,  L.L.,  KEENEY,  D.R.
    Improving  nitrogen  efficiency
    Nitrapyrin or suIfur-conted urea
 Abstroctb 1977,  p.  159.
 HENDRICKSON,   L.L.   1977.   Persistence  and  activity   of
    Nitrapyrin  and   its  effect  on  nitrification  and plant
    growth.  Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. Wisconsin-Madison. 217 p
 SAFFIGNA. P.G..  KEENEY. D.R. and TANNER.  C.B. 1977.  Nitrogen.
    chloride and  water balance with irrigated  Russet  Bur-bank
    potatoes in central  Wisconsin.  Agron.  J.  69:251-257
 SAFFIGNA, P.G. and  KEENEY,  D.R.   1977.   Nitrogen and chloride
    uptake by irrigated Russet Buruai,* potatoes.    Agron    J
    69:258-264
 SAFFIGNA. P.G..  KEENEY,  D.R. and TANNER,  C.B. 1977.  Lysimeter
    and  field measurements of chloride and bromide leaching in
    an   uncultivated  loamy   sand.    Soil   Sci.   Soc.  Am.   J
    41:478-482.

-------
DIALOG File60: USDA/CRIS 75-79/DEC (Item   146  of   263)  User  2691  IBjanOO
                                                                                                                              306
005b253
AGENCY: CSRS  NY.G
PERIOD: 01 OCT 77 TO 30 SEP 02
INVtST: PECK  N H; VITTUM  M T
PROJECT*: NYG33480
PERF ORG: SEED & VEGETABLE SCIENCES
LOCATION: N Y AGRICULTURE EXPT STATION
          GENEVA   NY
ORIGIN,  TRANSFORMATION,
WATERS, AND PLANTS
                          AND MANAGEMENT OF NITROGEN IN SOILS,
OBJECTIVES:   Develop  management  practices  for
enrichnent  of  waters  and  optimizing  nitrogen
product ion.
 minimizing
use In crop
APPROACH:  Several aspects of vegetable production relating to
optimal  nitrogen fertilization and cultural practices will be
Investigated. Emphasis will be given to evaluating rate, time,
and placement of urea, ammonium nitrate, diamraonium phosphate,
and slow-release nitrogen fertilizer as  base-.;  for  achieving
optimil I nitrogen nutrition of certain vegetable crops.  Use of
cover crops and  interplanted  crops  to  minimize  losses  and
maximize carry-over of nitrogen will be studied.  The nitrogen
contribution of  legumes (snap beans,  peas,   and alfalfa)   in
rotation  as  revealed  in  nitrogen  release and availability
during  the  growing  season  will  receive  some   attention.
Evaluation of experiments will include nitrate  tissue analysis
to  monitor  the  balance  between rates of nitrate uptake and
assimilation by  plants at variour growth stages. Intensity and
duration of solar radiation and other site variables  will  be
measured as a basis for interpreting optimal nitrogen needs.

KEYWORDS:   NITROGEN  NITRATES  FERTILIZATION   PLANT-NUTRIENTS
WATER-POLLUTION  VEGETABLES  SOILS  WATER   CULTURAL-PRACTICES
FERULIZER-APPLICATION UREA AMMONIUM-NITRATE AMMONIUM-PHOSPHA-
TE     SLOW-RELEASE-FERTILIZERS    COVER-CROPS   INTER-PLANTING
NUTRIENT-LOSSES   NUTRIENT-UPTAKE-(PLANTS)      PLANT-NUTRITION
LEGUMES CROP-ROTATION

PROGRESS:77/OI   77/12
  Seedling   responses   to   sources  of  N  fertilizers   were
determined  for  sweet corn  variety Jubilee.   Ammonium   nitrate
(AN),   urea  (U),   ammonium sulfate  (AS),   and  calcium  nitrate
(CN)   were  applied  in a band zone &  cm  to the side  and 5 cm
below  the steeds  at  planting time,   at rates of  0  to 20  g N per
m of row. Constant  rates of 5 g P from  CSP  plus 5 g K  from KOI
per m  of row were also applied  in the band.   The soil  was   a
fine   sandy   loam   derived   from  calcareous glacial till.   AS
caused the  lowest concentration of  nitrate  in the plants.   AN
and  AS  produced   seedlings with greater dry weight  than  U or
CN.  Plants grown with CN  had high  concentration  of Ca  and low
concentration  of P.   Rates of  about 4  g N  per  m  row   produced
the    greatest    dry   weight   per   plant  and   the   highest
concentration  of P  in  the  plants.    Equipment was  constructed
 in  a   greenhouse   to expose plants  to  gradually  increasing or
                decreasing light  coming from different angles  or  directions,
                thus simulating natural  outdoor conditions,   in order to study
                the diurnal  variation of  nitrate  in  plants.    Responses  of
                vegetable;,  to  nitrogen will be determined  by  measuring plant
                growth and uptake of nitrate-N  and  total   N  during  growth,
                development,  and maturation.

                PUBLICATIONS:77/01  77/12
                 NO PUBLICATIONS REPORTED THIS PERIOD.
0015395
AGENCY: ARS  3505
PERIOD; 25 JUN 79 TO 25 JUN ea
INVEST: LINDSTROM  M J: HOLT  R F
PROJECT*: 3505-20750-008
PERF ORG: USDA-ARS TILLAGE WATER USE &
          SOIL-PLANT-ATMOS RES
LOCATION: NC SOIL CONSERVATION RES LAB
          MORRIS   MIN
                ASSESSMENT
                SYSTEM
                            OF  THE  EFFECT  OF RESIDUE HARVESTING ON THE SOIL
                OBJECTIVES:  To determine the effect of  residue  removal  for
                energy  production  on  water runoff,  soil erosion,  nutrient
                transport, and soil physical and chemical changes.

                APPROACH:  Triplicate runoff plots equipped to measure runoff,
                sediment,   and  nutrient   transport  will  be  established at
                Madison, South Dakota and Morris,  Minnesota.  Residue removal
                will  be  based  on  the calculated  (USLE)  amounts of residue
                needed  (Y)  to maintain soil loss   levels  at  the  soil   loss
                tolerance  (T)   level  for  a  conservation  tillage  system.
                Residue  levels will be Y, 2Y,  and  1/2Y.  Tillage systems  will
                include a conventional fall plow, spring disk,  and harrow,  a
                conservation,  and a no till system.   Base soil physical  and
                chemical  properties will be measured at the  initiation of the
                experiment and monitored for changes with time for  the various
                residue and tillage systems.

                KEYWORDS: *REVIEW-PENDING-79228

-------
  DIALOG FII.60I USDA/CRIS 75-79/DEC (Item  ,55 of  263) U.ar 269, ,8janao
                                                                                                                                 310
  004/1004
  AGENCY: ARS  3302
  PERIOD: 02 OCT va TO 02 OCT ei
  INVEST: BRADFORD  j M
  PROJECT*:  3302-20000-004
  PERF  ORG:  USDA-ARS-WATER EROSION RES
            AGRONOMY DEPT
  LOCATION:  PURDUE UNIV
            LAFAYETTE   IND

  SOIL  CHARACTERIZATION FOR ERODIBILITY
                                                             and
                                                      detachment
                                                   which  reduce
                                     procedure*  to measure  thu
     -  	....,,  to resist  soil detachment.  Determine soil
      properties responsible   for  differences   In
processes.   Define  tillage or management me
soil erod.biMty  and  surface  runoff  and  improve  seedling
env.ronn.cnt.     Relate  erosion  processes  to  soil
strength differences within a. particular soil profile
different  strat(graphic   and  geomorphic settings.   Separate
rill and interill erodibility factors on  the           P^'aie
propert ies.
                                                        hoi- i zoo
                                                       and   for
                                                basi s  of  soiI
 APPROACH:    Laboratory   shear  strength  determinations  and
 raindrop impact studies will be used to study sol. detachment.
 Field studies will  Include  a  characterization  of  hydiulic
 properties in relation to soil detachment.  Stress-deformation
 propert.es  of  soils under various loading conditions will bo
 determ.ned for particular soil horizons  within  a  particular
 son   profile  and for soils under different st rat i graphic and
 geo,,,orphic settings.    These proper t i es  will   be  related  to

 tes?TtnPn0<;eS5e8',,   Manaaenlent  °r   tillagesystemswll.be
 tested to reduce soil  erosion and surface water-runoff.
           MFASUPPMPMTn               LABOHATOHY-TECHN.QUES
           MEASUREMENT   SOIL-PROPERTIES  DETACHMENT-MECHANISMS
 TILLAGE   EROSION-CONTROL  RUNOFF  SOIL-HORIZONS   SOIL-PROF  LES
 IMPACT   RAIN   RAINDROP-EROSION SURFACE-WATER  SOI L-BULK-DENS 1 T\
 SOU-STRUCTURE RILL-EROSION SOI L-CHARACTERIST ICS  CHARACTER ul-
 eroslon and infiltration.  Determine the effect of
 on infiltration and hydraulic conductivity   Deve op a
 component  for  an  agricultural  chemical  transport   mod
 Deve op  so,)   conditioners  and  stabilizers  for  contro? of
 eros.on on critical areas.    Determine  size  distribution  of
 transport"'^'3'  .""?,  '""  """"»"« «f this dtstMbuUon on
 transport  of   agricultural  chemicals.     Develop   practical
 farming systems for conservation.            ^veiop   practical


 measuring soi ! *' V^' " "'"  ' "C ' Ude "Se °f  a "a'nulator for
 measur  ng soil  and water  losses  and a sprinkling i nf i I trometer

                   -
maera                           size   di str ibut ion   of  eroded
materials.  and  for chemical and  physical analyses.     Crosion
Cs?na0on-oo ^MVeneSS  °f   f a-" "9  =VS«e,,,s w i H  be  deter^ned
using on going experiments at Purdue University   and  Woosler,

KEYWORDS:    TILLAGE   MULCHES    SOILS    EROSION  son-rnnci,
INFILTRATION  COMPACTION  SOIL-COMPACTION   MODELS    TRAr SPOR^
                 ^^
004-1803
AGENCY: ARS   3302
PERIOD: 02 OCT  ?a  TO  02  OCT  ei
INVEST: MOLDENHAUER   w c
PROJECT*: 3302-20800-003
PERF ORG: USDA-ARS-WATER EROSION  RES
          AGRONOMY DEPT
LOCATION: PURDUE UNIV
          LAFAYETTE   IND

TILLAGE-MULCH EFFECTS ON EROSION  AND INFILTRATION

OBJECTIVES:    Determine  the tillage-mulch Interaction on soil

-------
DIALOG File60: USDA/CRIS 75-79/DEC (Item  161  of   263)  User  2691  IBjanBO
                                                                                                                              313
0043789
AGENCY: ARS  3505
PERIOD: 23 MAY 77 TO 23 MAY oo
INVEST: ONSTAD  C A; HOLT  R F;  YOUNG  R A
PROJECT*: 3505-20800-004
PERF ORG: USDA-ARS POLLUTION 4EROSIQN RE
          S
LOCATION: NC SOIL CONSERVATION RES LAB
          MORRIS   WIN

ASSESSMENT   OF  SEDIMENT  ATTRIBUTED  TO  UPLAND  EROSION  IN
MINNESOTA AGRICULTURAL AREAS

OBJECTIVES:  Develop,  tost,  and i-eftne mathematical  modeling
techniques  for  estimating  erosion  and sediment yields from
ung^ged agricultural watersheds for time periods ranging  from
a   single   storm   to  annual   amounts.    Soil,   physical,
hydrological and meteorological  characteristics  and  cultural
practices  will  also  be related to sediment source areas for
given basins.

APPROACH:  This study will rely heavily on the use of  readily
available data for  the model watershed parameters.  These data
include  the Conservation Needs Inventory data county land use
data.  geomorphlc soil  landscape descriptions,  fegional  soil
associations,  and  USGS  topographic maps.   Other model Inputs
include  the   traditional  USLE  parameters.    Existing  data
obtained   from  state  and  federal  agencies  will be used to
calibrate  the models so  that  they  can  be  used  on  ungagcd
watersheds.   When  satisfactory validation Is reached on  large
basins,  smaller areas will be  investigated with  the  intent of
isolating  and  characterizing  sediment sources  for county or
sub-county sized areas.

KEYWORDS:  STREAMS GULLIES SEDIMENT-SOURCES SOILS  SEOIMENTAIION
MATHEMATICAL-MODELS DATA-COLLECTION   HYDROLOGY   CALIBRATION
RILL-EROSION MODELS WATERSHEDS  SEDIMENTS EROSION  PRECIPITATION
SEDIMENT-TRANSPORT  RUNOFF

PROGRESS:77/04  77/12
 Average annual sediment yields have been determined  for  broad
areas   in  Minnesota.    These  determinations were made  using
estaolished   techniques  with   available   land  use,    soils,
streamHow,    and   sedimentation  data.
yield  of of over  1050   kg/ha  occurs   In
extreme  southeast Minnesota.    In general,
of   southeastern    Minnesota    had    the
agricultural   areas of  southern   and western Minnesota  range
from 56  kg/ha  in  the  lower  rainfall   areas   of   West   Central
Minnesota  to  560  kg/ha  in  South Central  Minnesota.    Thoughout
the state,   the  largest  amount  of   sealment   is   lost   in the
months  of  March   through  June.     This  amounts  to about 75
percent  of  the total yield.   Nearly  30 percent of  the  average
annual  sediment  !oss occurs in  the  month of  April  alone.   The
sediment  yield peak does not  coincide  with   that   of   rainfall
but more   closely   coincides  with  streamflow.    The time of
The highest sediment
the  Root  River  in
  the ariftless area
 highest   intensive
highest sediment yield coincides with the occurrence of spring
tillage operations, however,  channel cleanout from streambank
or  gully  erosion  also  occurs  during  high  flow  periods.
Detailed investigation of the sediment sources are continuing.

PUBLICATIONS:77/04  77/12
 NO PUBLICATIONS REPORTED THIS PERIOD.
0043788
AGENCY: AHS  3505
PERIOD: 01 JUN 77 TO 01 JUN BO
INVEST: YOUNG  R A: VOQRHEES  w B
PROJECT*! 3505-20800-003
PEHF ORG: USDA-ARS TILLAGE WATER USE A-
          SOIL-PLANT-ATMOS RES
LOCATION: NC SOIL CONSERVATION RES  LAB
          MORRIS   MIN

EFFECTS  OF  AGRICULTURAL  WHEEL  TRAFFIC  ON SOIL EROSION AND
RUNOFF

OBJECTIVES:  Study the effect of controlled  wheel traffic  a.-1
subsequent  soil compaction on  infiltration,  runoff,   surface
sealing, and soil erosion.

APPROACH:  A rainulator will be used  to apply known  amounts  of
rainfall  energy  on plots  in which a  history of wheel  traffic
has been established.   Standard runoff collection   procedures
will  be  modified  to separate wheel  track  erosion  and runoff
from  that occurring in the non-tracked areas.   Various  field
and   laboratory  measurements   will be made  to  determine basic
cause and effect  relationships  between   wheel  traffic  soil
compaction,    and  erosion.     This  includes   the density and
stability of soil clotls,  surface roughness and  porosity.  clod
size  distribution etc.

KEYWORDS:      SOIL-POROSITY   CLODS   SOILS    TRAFFIC    WHEELS
SOIL-SURFACE SOIL-ERODIBIL1TY SOIL-CHARACTERISTICS  SOIL-EROSI-
ON INFILTRATION  SOIL-COMPACTION RUNOFF EROSION

PROGRESS '.77/OB  77/12
  Sixteen  plots  were   established   and planted  to   soybeans.
Particle  size  distributions and  aggregate  size distributions
were  determined  and random roughness   was measured   for  the
soil   areas  within   the   wheel   tracks   and between the wheel
tracks.   Runoff  and soil  loss  from these  areas  will  be studied
under simulated  rainfall  in 1978.

PUBLICATIONS-.77/OB  77/12
  NO PUBLICATIONS REPORTED THIS  PERIOD.

-------
 DIALOG FlleGO: USDA/CRIS 75-79/DEC  (Item  206 of  263) User 2G£ 1 ISjanBO
                                                                                                                                353
 0032529
 AGENCY: CSRS  OHO
 PERIOD: 01 OCT ea TO 31 DEC BO
 INVEST: SCHWAB  G o; FAUSEY  N R; TAYLOR
 PROJECT*:  OH000064
 PERT ORG:  AGRI ENGINEERING
 LOCATION:  OHIO AGRICULTURAL R AND D CENTER
           COLUMBUS   OHO

 DRAINAGE   SYSTEMS  DESIGN  FOR  POLLUTION  CONTROL  AND  CROP
 PRODUCTION

 OBJECTIVES:   Determine the effectiveness of various systems on
 crop  production  under  field  conditions.    Determine  tile
 outflow,  surface runoff,  and the quantity and kinds, of  soluble
 and suspended  materials  in  drainage  water  resulting  from
 pesticide,   and fertilizer applications.   Compare  crop yields
 with and without irrigation in order  to  adjust  prior  yield
 data for excess water.

 APPROACH:  Proposed crop,  and water  management practices to  end
 of  project are a rotation of corn,   oats and soybeans  in split
 plot  design,   using no irrigation on one group  and  6  inches of
 water   applied  in  two applications on  the others.   Rainfall,
 surface runoff,  tile flow,  solar  radiation,  and temperature of
 soil  and air  will  be recorded as  has  been   done  for   several
 years.     Drainage  water  and  sediment  in the  water  will  be
 analyzed for  plant  nutrients (N0(3).,  P0(4).,  K., Ca..,   Mg..,
 Na.,  C1.).    Sediment  content,   pH  and electrical conductivity
 will  also  be  measured.    A  high,  uniform  fertilization  rate
 will   be   maintained  on   all   plots.     Crop response  will  be
 measured by stand   counts  and  crop  yields.   Lysimeters   of
 undisturbed   soil   from  4   soil  types  -  Toledo,  Hoytville,
 Brookston  and Genesee,  will  be used  also.

 KEYWORDS:      DRAINAGE;     DRAINAGE-SYSTEMS      CROP-PRODUCTION
 CROP-YIELDS TILE-DRAINAGE  WATER-QUALITY  SEDIMENTS WATER-POLLU-
 TION    RUNOFF   PESTICIDES   FERTILIZERS   IRRIGATION  CORN  OATS
 SOYBEANS CROP-RESPONSE  SOILS  ENGINEERING NUTRIENTS

 PROGRESS:78/01   70/12
 The  tile drainage  field  experiment  was  in  corn, soybeans,  and
 oats  (split plot).   Average corn yields  in  1978  were  75B9
 kgs/ha  for   surface  drainage  only.    87B1  kgs/ha  for tile
 drainage only,  and  9283  kgs/ha for  combination  of   tile   and
 surface  drainage.    These  are more  than 30%  higher than  the-
 10-year average,  partly due to higher nitrogen fertilization.
 Soybean yields were  2680, 3226, and  3360  kgs/ha, respectively.
 They  were nearly  the same as  the 3-year  average.    Oat yields
 were 2688,  3405,  and 3620 kgs/ha,   respectively.    These were
 all   more  than 85%  higher  than  the 4-year average.   Average
 annual sediment  losses  for the 9-year period  (1969-1977)  were
 2678  and  1676  kgs/ha   for   surface  runoff  and  tile flow,
 respectively.    Corresponding  losses for NO(3)-N for the  same
period were 16 and 25 kgs/ha;  for P,  2.2 and 1.2  kgs/ha;  and
 for  K, 32 and 24 kgs/ha.  Lysimeter  plots were in  corn in 1973
with yields varying from 8655  to  11,164 kgs/ha  among  the   four
soil  types.    Yields  were nearly  the same  for  the  two  water
table levels.

PUBLICATIONS:78/01  78/12
 SCHWAB.  G.O.  1978.   Effect of  openings  on  drain   inflow.
    Drainage Contractor 4(12):40. June.
 SCHWAB,   G.O.  1978.  Age effects on sub-surface drain  flow
    Drainage Contractor 4(12):24. June.
 SCHWAB.  G.O.  1978.   Environmental water management research
    and  practices  in  Ohio.  FuIbright-Hays lecture given at
    University of  Ljubljana, Yugoslovia. May.

-------
DIALOG File60: USDA/CRIS 75-79/DEC (Item  213 of   263)  User 2o91  18jan80
                                                                                                                              360
0027533
AGENCY: CSRS  ILLU
PERIOD: 01 MAY 78 TO 30 SEP 02
INVEST: LEMBKE  W D; MITCHELL  J K;  WALKER  P N
PROJECT*:  ILLU-10-0319
PERF ORG:  AGRI ENGINEERING
LOCATION:  UN IV OF ILLINOIS
          URBANA    ILL

SOIL AND WATER CONTROL SYSTEMS APPLIED TO ILLINOIS

OBJECTIVES:  Study  soil and water control systems fop Illinois
in order to optimize crop production while preserving soil and
water resources.

APPROACH:  Develop and use mathematical, electrical,  hydraulic
and  hydrologic models of evaluate the performance of soil and
water control systems  in Illinois.  Evaluate the  benefits  of
irrigation  and  drainage  systems on Illinois soils.  Surface
depression storage  will be quantified as a  function  of  soil
permeability, rainfall intensity-duration and runoff.  Erosion
and  deposition  of soil aggregates and soil particles will be
studied   in   the   laboratory  and  in  the  field  to   define
manage nent conditions causing excessive erosion ^and depostion.
Crusting of soil will be studied as a factor determined by the
soil aggregate stability and rainfall energy.

KEYWORDS:      SOIL   WATER    CONTROL    MODELS    HYDROLOGY
HYDKOLOGIC-MOOELS  IRRIGATION-SYSTEMS DRAINAGE-SYSTEMS SOIL-PE-
RMEABILITY    EROSION   SOIL-PARHCLES   DRAINAGE     IRRIGATION
CONTROL-SYSTEMS    ENGINEERING   RESOURCE-CONSERVATION  RAINFALL
RUNOFF WATER-STORAGE

PROGRESS-.77/01   77/12
 A cooperative project between  the Department of  Agricultural
Engineering   and  the Department of Agronomy has been initiated
to study  irrigation and drainage on claypan so1Is.   Irrigation
treatments are sprinkler,   furrow and no  irrigation.  Drainage
treatments  are  surface,   Subsurface,  surface plu'^  subsurface
and  no drainage.    During  1977  irrigated  plot yields  averaged
9.3   tonnes/ha.    while  nonirrigated plot yields averageJ 4.3
tonnes/ha.    A study was also  initiated  to determine  at  what
vertical  deflection failure  of  corrugated plastic drain  tubing
occurs.     This   study  includes the determination of hydraulic
capacity,   tubing  stiffness   and   load   carrying  capacitv  as
functions  of   tubing  deflection.   A   study of  soil crusting
involved  the  emergence  of   soybean  plants   through  a   crust
formed  by   the   application  of  simulated   rainfall.     Soil
texture,   organic  matter,    rainfall   intensity   and rainfall
energy  are  the  independent  variables being controlled  in this
study.

PUBLICATIONS:77/01   77/12
 DRAULOS,  C.J.W.,  WALKER,   P.N.   and SCARBOROUGH.  J.N.   1977.
     Field  Evaluation  of   Corrugated  Plastic   Drain   Tubing.
     Proceedings  of  Third National Drainage  Symposium. American
   Society of Agricultural Engineers.   ASAE,   St.   Joseph,
   WALKER, P.N. and LEMBKE, W.D. 1977. Recycling Agricultural
   Runoff.   University  of  Illinois  Water Resources Center
   Research Report No. 119. 88 pages.
ELLIOTT,  R.L., LEMBKE, W.D. and HUNT, D.R. 1977. A Simulation
   Model  for Predicting  Available  Days  for  Soil  Tillage.
   Transactions of ASAE 20(1):4-8.
VOORHEES, M.L. and WALKER,  P.N.  1977.  TractionabiIity as a
   Function  of  Soil   Moisture.    Transactions   of   ASAE
   20(5):006-809.

-------
 DIALOG File60: USDA/CfllS 75-79/DEC (Hera  253 of  263) User 2S91 ISjanBO
                                                                                                                                400
 0001860
 AGENCY: CSRS  ILLU
 PERIOD: 13 JUL 55 TO 30 SEP 79
 INVEST: MITCHELL  d K;  DICKEY,  E c
 PROJECT*:  ILLU-10-0312
 PERF  ORG:  AGRI ENGINEERING
 LOCATION:  UNIV OF ILLINOIS
           URBANA   ILL

 RUNOFF  FROM SMALL AGRICULTURAL AREAS IN ILLINOIS

 OBJECTIVES:    Determine  the  frequencies  of   peak  rates and
 volumes of runoff from  agricultural  watersheds of  25  to  1000
 acres  located  on permeable soils with mild slopes In Central
 Illinois.    Test and evaluate the usefulness  of  mathematical
 hydro logic  models  to  small agricultural  watersheds with mild
 topography.    Provide benchmark watersheds in  Central  Illinois
 for  the study  of the quality of runoff  water.

 APPROACH:    Four  fully  instrumented   watersheds  are  being
 maintained near  Monticello,   Illinois.     To  supplement   data
 obtained at  Monticello,   maximum stage  recorders are installed
 on watersheds  ranging in size from 45 to 1400   acres.     Model
 studies and field calibrations have been  conducted on several
 field structures.

 KEYWORDS:  MANAGEMENT-SYSTEMS SOIL-PERMEABILITY MATHEMATICAL-M-
 ODELS FREQUENCY  SOIL-WATER-RELATIONS RATE-DETERMINATION VOLUME
 WATER-FLOW WATER-QUALITY HYDROLOGY CROPPING-SYSTEMS WATERSHEDS
 RUNOFF  ENGINEERING SLOPES

 PROGRESS:77/01   77/12
 The  1975  and  1976 rainfall  and runoff  data  from the   Allerton
 watersheds  have  been  reduced,   tabulated,  and assembled fop
 analysis.    The  temperature-humidity   data   is   transcribed
 through  1970.    The  total  rainfall  for 1975 was 1080  nun  -«hich
 was 130  mm greater than  normal.   The rainfall  for  1976 was 820
 mm,   a  lower than  normal  rainfall  total.   Runoff  events   were
 quite   numerous   in   1975  with  59  mm  of  runoff recorded from
 Watershed  B1.  However,   only 12 mm of runoff was recorded from
 Watershed  A1.  Although  total  rainfall  was less  than normal  in
 1976,   runoff  from Watershed A1   and B1   was  32   and 26 nun
 respectively.    The  rainfall  deficiencies  occurred  in  January,
 April, November  and December.   Rainfalls occurring  the last of
 February   and  in  March  produced 95  percent of the  runoff.   A
 study  was  completed   that   provides   rainfall  iritensi ty-aiid
 runoff  depth-duration   frequency  data  for   the  rainfall  and
 runoff  events   at   the   Allerton  Watersheds.      Statistical
 analysis   were   conducted on  rainfall  and runoff data  through
 1975.    These analysis  indicated that the  length of record for
 annual rainfall,   annual  maximum intensity,  annual exceeclance
 runoff and other weather  data  is  adequate.    The   length  of
 record   is  not  adequate   for   monthly  rainfall analyses and
annual exceedance  runoff  analysis  for Watershed W1. A  study is
 in progress using  the rainfall-runoff records  from  Watersheds
A1   and  B1  as  a  basis  for   comparing watershed models  for
agricultural areas of mild topography.

POBLICATIONS:77/01  77/12
 HAROJOAMIDJOJO,  S.  1977.  Hydro logic  frequency   study   and
    analyses for Allerton agricultural watersheds. Unpublished
    M.S.    Thesis,    Library,   University  of  Illinois  at
    Ur bana-Chair.pa i gn.

-------
     CIALOG  FileGO:  USDA/CHIS 75-79/OEC (Item  258 of  263) User 2li£ 1 iBjanSO
                                                                                                                                    404
ui
--j
000)407
AGENCY: CSRS  IND
PERIOD: 01 JUL 68 TO 110 SEP 03
INVESI: MONKE  E J
PROJECT*: INDO-1C020
PEHF ORG: AGRI ENGINECRING
LOCATION: PURDUE UNIV
          LAFAYETTE    IND

IMPROVING THE QUALITY  Of LLAND AND WATER RESOURCES

OBJECTIVES:   To  study  the  effect  of drainage practices  on
cropping management,   crop response.  and water,  sediment and
nutrient yields, to  Investigate  factors affecting soil  erosion
and   crusting,    to   measure   and   predict  sediment  and
related-chemical pollution of streams  and   lakes   from  rural
sources,   and  to   study  the dynamics of water 31,d  pollutant
movement  in so I 1 .

APPROACtl: The general  approach is to simulate  the movement and
reactions of w3ter and waterborne pollutants  through  the  soil
and  overland  into streams or  lakes.   The models will  be used
to establish  field experiments to validate the   models   or   to
suggest  ir.od-j I  changes.     In   addition,  seperate  laboratory
expert ne'-,ts  will  be  conducted to  study   specific  factors
concerning soil erosion and  crusting.

KEYWORDS: /'REV I EW--PUN!) 1110-7921 1

PROGRESS:va/oi  78/12
 Collection  ,-:nd  analysis   tit   runoff.    sediment   yield  arid
nutrient  loisr.  data  fro,:, a 4900 ha agricultural  watershed  have
been  cunt inus'J.     A  computer model was developed  to identify
source  areas of the  sediment  and related   chemical   pollutants
baootl   on  the  output data.   soils and  topographic  information,
and  land  use.   Several smaller, single   practice   water-.ned:.
have   n.iw  been   i n ~> triur.ente-d within   the  larger  water-shod to
verify  the model  results and to  provide  baseline   inrorm.il  ion
for    effects   of    land    use    in    runoff  water  quality.
Ba t lery-powtirod sampling  instrumentation   w'  developed
and  tested.   Di sch.urg-.- of  sedin.ent  from  tile outfalls dra \ r, i ng
heavy  lakebed  soils  in the Maumeo  Das in  has  boon   previously
no led.     Subsequently discharge   from  a   17  ha   subsurface
drainaoo  system in  Hoytville silty  clay  was  monitored.    After
an   initial   flush   which  did  not   always   occur,   soil iment
concentrations  tended  to   remain   uniform   i rreripec t  t ve   of
c)iscji.-irge rates.  A  computer mod-.'1  was  ca I i Cr,3 li-rj and verified
using  this  discharge data.   A coir.r-ar i son  laboratory experiment
employing  intermittent   wetting  2nd   drying  of  soil  columns
showed  that  Hoytville  «ilty  trlay (a  I akebed-a-.iioc i a ted  soil,
44%    clr.y)   and  Latty silty clay (a  lakebed soil,   48%  clay)
discharged  approximately  6 and 8  times,    respectively,    the
weight   of  sediment  a=> discharged from a column of  Blount soi'
 loan (a glacial  till soil,  30% clay).
                                                                         MONKE, E.J. and  WHEATON,  R.Z.  1978.  Sediment contributions to
                                                                            the Mauinee  River.
                                                                         What  level of  sediment  control  is feasible? EPA-905/9-78-001.
                                                                            Proc. of Conference  on Voluntary  and Regulatory Approach^..
                                                                            for Nonpomt  Source  Pollution MONKE,  E.J.  and  BOUCHER,
                                                                            A.B.  1978.  Tile  drainage studies. In:  EnvironmenlcI  Impact
                                                                            of  Land Use  on  Water  Quality -  Final Report un the Black
                                                                            Creek Project.
                                                                         d.   Lake (dir.)   and  J.   Morrison (ed).   EPA-905/9-77-007-B.
                                                                            USEPA,  Region V,  130TTCHER,  A.B. 1978.  Si n.ua I t i on of a tile
                                                                            drainage system  with associated sediment transport.   Ph.D.
                                                                            Thesis. Purdue University,  W. Lafayette, IN 137p.
                                                                         /9-77-007-B,  USEPA,  Region V.  Chicago,  IL. pp. 2S2-272.
                                                                         MONKE, E.J.,  NELSON,  O.W.. DOTTCHER, A.B.  find 50MMERS,  L.E.
                                                                            1978-   Sources   of   sediment  and  related  pollutants   *
                                                                            Comparison of subwatershods.  In:  Environmental Impact of
                                                                            Land  Use on Water  Quality - Final Report on the black
     PUBL1CATIONS:70/OI   79/12

-------
     DIALOG Flle60:  USDA/CRIS 75-79/DEC (Item   15  of    28)  User  2S'J1  MjanUO
                                                                                                                                  2407
Ln
CO
0057925
AGENCY: CSRS  MICL
PERIOD: 01 JUL 70 TO 30 SEP eo
INVEST: ZINOEL  H C
PROJECT*: M1CL01064
PERF ORG: POULTRY SCIENCE
LOCATION: MICHIGAN STATE UNIV
          EAST LANSING   MIC

ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS FOR THE 1900'S

OBJECTIVES:   Develop optimal animal manure management systems
to meet evolving environmental and economic  requirements  and
be  conpatible  with  increasing  needs  for  animal  protein.
Characterize atmospheric contaminants  and  develop  abatement
methods  to eliminate contaminants potentially harmful effects
on human and animal health.  Investigate use of by products of
animal  manure  management  systems  for energy sources,  feed
ingredients,  plant nutrients for crop  production  and  other
potential  uses.    Characterize  non-point  population  'vater
runoff sources  from  Iivestock  and  poultry  enterprises  on
pasture   production   systems  and  land  areas  with  m.inure
application and further develop guidelines  for  abatement  of
non-point pollution sources from animal manures.

APPROACH:   Waste  management  systems  presently  employed in
Michigan will be monitored and evaluated for  improved  design
for  machinery  management technique and collection alleyways.
Determine the influence of  feeding  an  odor  suppressant   to
broilers  and  laying hens in relationship to feed efficiency,
weight gain, and fecal  odors.  Study of anaerobic organisms in
poultry anaphage.   Upgrading the crude protein  of  anaphage.
Study  the  calcium  and  postasium  availability from poultry
anaphage.   Study the amino  acid  availability  by  employing
turn-over rate estimates, involving radio labeled iimino acids.

KEYWORDS:     MANURE-MANAGEMENT    POLLUTION    #EWU   POULTRY
ANIMAL-WASTE    ODOR    WASTE-UTILIZATION     ANIMAL-NUTRITION
POULTRY-MANURE    CALCIUM   RUNOFF   PASTURES   ENERGY-SOURCES
POTASSIUM  PliOTEIN-SOUUCES  WASTE-MANAGEMENT  FEED  GUIDELINES
PLANI-NUTR1TION   AMINO-ACIDS   FEED-EFFICIENCY   WEIGHT-CAINS
WATER-POLLUTION BYPRODUCTS flERP

PROGI)ESS:78/OI  78/12
 A flat-plate 110m 2 solar collector was used for supplemental
heating of ventilation  air entering  a  poultry  layer  house.
This  supplemental   heat  made  it possible to maintain higher
in—house  temperatures    in   Michigan   without   temperature
stratification.     Further  work  is underway to establish the
humidity gradient across the house.

PUBLICATIONS:78/01   7B/12
 HALL, F.W., ESMAY, M.L., FLEGAL,   C.J.,  SHEPPARD,  C.C.  and
    ZINDEL, H.C. 1978.
 Solar  heating;  impact on poultry layer house.  Paper number
    78-4550, 1978.
                                                                         Annual  Meeting,  American Society of Agricultural Engineers.
                                                                         RICHMOND.  D.  and CHANG,  T.S. 1978. A comparison of drop-plate
                                                                            and  pour-plate methods for bacterial population counts  of
                                                                            poultry anaphage (dehydrated caged layer excreta). Poultry
                                                                            Science 57:293-295.
0070237
AGENCY: CSRS  ILLU
TO 30 SEP 79
INVEST: WALTERS  c s; GILMORE  A R
PROJECT*: ILLU-55-033G
PERF ORG: FORESTRY
LOCATION: UNIV OF ILLINOIS
          URBANA   ILL

POLLUTION  OF  SOIL AND GROUNDWATER BY WOOD PRESERVATIVES AS A
FUNCTION OF RAINFALL

OBJECTIVES:  Determine the amount of arsenic  leached  from wood
treated   with   four  commercially-important.   water-soluble
preservatives.   Determine the extent of  pollution   of  soil,
surface  runoff,   and  soil  filtrate  by  woods treated with
chruinated  copper  preservatives  containing  arsenic  or   a
fluor-chrome-arsenate-phenol formulation.

APPROACH: Pressure treated pine post stubs with a known amount
of preservative will be exposed in a teflon box.  The box will
permit the collection of surface runoff, filtrate and soil for
quantitative  analyses.    Three soil types will be exposed to
"rain"  from a raintowcr facility to  facilitate  leaching  of
arsenic from the wood.

KEYWORDS:   SOIL-WATER  GROUNDWATER WOOD-TREATMENT RUNOFF RAIN
RAINFALL  PRECIPITATION  SOILS  SOIL-POLLUTION   PRESERVATIVES
ARSENIC LEACHING POLLUTION

PROGRESS:77/01  77/12
 Soil  pans  were  constructed  so  that  Douglas  fir plywood
specimens  treated  with  copperized  chrome   arsenate   wood
preservatives  could  be  exposed  in a raintower.  Samples of
surface  runoff  and  leachate  were  collected  at   intervals
ranging  from  15  minutes to 27 hours.   About 600 samples of
soil, wood, cheesecloth (filter), leachate, and surface runoff
were   collected   for   arsenic   analysis.     The   arsenic
determinations will be completed by February  1978.

PUQLICATIONS:77/01  77/12
 NO PUBLICATIONS REPORTED THIS PERIOD.

-------
                                    TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
                            (Pleate nad Instructions on the went before completing)
 .REPORT NO.
 EPA 905/9-80-006-B
                                                            3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION NO.
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
 Post-PLUARG Evaluation of Great  Lakes
 Water Quality Management Studies  and Programs
                                                            6. REPORT DATE
                                                              March 1980
                                                             . PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
  AUTMOR(S)
           Rose Ann  C.  Sullivan,
           Paul A. Sanders and
           Nil 1 tarn
                                                             i. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
                                                             10. PROGRAM ELEMENt NO.
                                                              A42B2A
                                                             H.C6KITRAC1V6RANTN6.
. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION
Great Lakes  Basin Commission
3475 Plymouth Road
P.O. Box  999
Ann Arbor. Michigan  48106
                               ADDRESS
                                                              EPA-79-D-F0857
12. SPONSORING AOENCV NAME AND ADDRESS
 Great Lakes National  Program  Office
 U.S. Environmental  Protection Agency
 536 South  Clark  Street,  Rm 932
 Chicago. Ill Inn-i
                                                            13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
                                                             Progress   Oct. 79'/Mar.  80'
                                                            14. SPONSORING AOENCV CODE
                                                              U.S. EPA-GLNPO
IB. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
 This study is  to  provide an update of activities  since PLLIARG  was presented to  the
 Water Quality  Board.
IB. ABSTRACT	

This report represents the results  of recent efforts by the Great Lakes Basin
Commission staff  to update and  integrate the findings and recommendations of
the International  Joint Commission's Pollution  from Land Use Activities.
17.
                                 KEV WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
                   DESCRIPTORS
                                                b.IDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS
                                                                           c.  COSATl Field/Group
  Sediment
  Phosphorus
  Atmospheric inputs
  Toxic  substances
  Nonpoint source pollution
                                                Lake Erie Wastewater
                                                Management
                                                Honey Creek
                                                Washington County
                                                River Mouth Loading
                                                Cyuahoga River
                                                Restoration Study
 18. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
                         Document is avail-
  able  to  the public through the National
  Technical  Information  Service, Springfield
                                     VA 22161
                                               19. SECURITY CLASS (This Report}
                                               None
21. NO. OF PAGES
     166
                                               20. SECURITY CLASS (Thispage)
                                               None
                                                                           22. PRICE
 EPA Fwn 2220-1 (R»v. 4-77)   PREVIOUS EDITION is OBSOLETE
                                                       U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE:  1981-750-744/79

-------