-------


p
R 60^
0
B
A
B
f 20-^
I
L -20-
I
M
I -40-
T
S-60H
X
-80 -1
40-
P
R 30-
0
; »-
B
I -
I
J -
L -10-
M
I -20-
T
S
-30-
X


















1 1 1
\ 1 -J
N02 PRECISION
1982-1985















-.-•



1








1 1
* <> «




P
R 30-
0
B „„

;
1
:
'•
•


A «"-
I B




L l0-
I
L -10-
§82 I
R M
H83 I -20-
fl84 T
iU84 s
1 85 -30-


1 1 1 1
N02 ACCURACY LEVEL 2
1982-1985














• 40 | | !





!
i
!


V,
1 p
1 E




• a
r 1






1 1 1






9
•


















X
-40 J
40-
R 30-
0
B
A
B
J 10-
j
Y 8"
- L -10-
|82 I
!.» M
83 j _20_
84 T
85 S -30-

N02 ACCURACY LEVEL 1








I
1







1 1 1
1982-1985





rf





1 r
j

jT

141
j i
u
























a

I"




II 1 1 1 1
N02 ACCURACY LEVEL 3
1982-1985





|
W
1






1 1 1 1 -w— 1 1 1







1 —


-1 !
1 i
;M


L Bn
1 gi B
f f^
1

















|es









§82
!83

84
85

1 I 1 l
> ». «, e 1 6 a s»
Figure 10.  Manual N02 precision and accuracy by region
            for 1982 through 1985.
                           29

-------
                                 Relative
               Regions            Score

               III, IX              9       Most improved
               VII                  8
               I, VI, VIII          7
               V                    1
               IV                   0       No change
               II                  -1
               X                   -4       Worse than 1984

The most improved measurement method was determined  by  combining the  rank-
ings across regions and across precision and accuracy.

                                 Relative
               Pollutant          Score

               Ozone                25      Most improved
               CO                    8
               S02                   7
               N02                   4
               N02 (manual)          3
               Pb                    1
               S02 (manual)         -2
               TSP                  -3      Least improved

     General comparisons  among  regions  can  be made  on  several  different
bases.  One basis  is  that of improvement,  as shown  by  the above analysis.
However, comparisons of improvement may  not  be  fair to  those regions  which
already demonstrate a  history  of  good precision and  accuracy  --  they have
little further  room  for  improvement and may  be approaching  the  inherent
limitations or  capabilities  of the measurement methods.   On the contrary,
the regions that  have  shown poorer precision  and  accuracy have more room
for improvement.

     A better measure  for comparison may be the magnitude of  the accuracy
assessments.  Not considering any  significant  biases reflected by the mean
of the upper  and  lower probability limits, the  spread  of the limits  would
be a  good  measure of  how well the  precision  and  accuracy  of measurement
systems are being  controlled.   The following analysis  using  the spread of
the limits provide this additional and perhaps  better way of making gener-
al comparisons across regions.

     Ranking comparisons  were  also  made   to   determine   the  regions  and
pollutant-measurememt methods which  were best  based on the widths  of the
probability limits for 1985.  These  comparisons were made  separately for
the continuous methods and manual methods and also separately for precision
and accuracy.  The rankings were:
                                     30

-------
                             Continuous  Methods
                Precision
             Region     Rank
             VI
             III.
             I
             II
             v,  x
             IX
             VIII
             VII
    IV
 1
 2.5
 4
 5
 6.5
 8
 9
10
                 Best
                              Accuracy
                           Region     Rank
                 Worst
          III
          II
          VIII,
          I
          X
          VII
          V, VI
          IV
                                 IX
 8
10
1
2
3.5
5
6
7
  5
       Best
      Worst
                    Manual  Methods (TSP and Pb Only)
                 Precision
              Region    Rank
                              Accuracy
                           Region     Rank
                 III
I,
X
IX
II
              IV, V
              VI
              VIII
              VII
 1.5
 3
 4
 5

 6.5
 8
 9
10
Best
                 Worst
V
II
IV
VI,
X
III
I
IX
VII



VIII





 1     Best
 2
 3
 5

 7
 8
 9
10     Worst
The above rankings are similar to those for previous years.

     It could be said  that  the comparisons of improvement relate to measures
of progress, whereas the comparisons of variabilities,  i.e., the  spread  of
the limits, relate to measures of achievement.

General
     Taking into account the minor trends of improvement, the  general  con-
sistency from year to year  of  the differences of results among  pollutants
and among levels of the same pollutants on a  national  basis,  and among re-
gions for given pollutants,  is  truly surprising.   These appreciable differ-
ences which  persist  from  year  to  year  strongly  indicate  that  whatever
forces or causal factors are in action in  each region and in  each pollutant
measurement system are  persistent  over the  years.  These significant  dif-
ferences between  regions  should be  investigated  to   identify  the major
causal factors, since  some  regions consistently  produce more precise  and
accurate data than other regions.
                                     31

-------
     Further, each region should  evaluate  the  differences  among the states
and reporting organizations in a  similar graphical manner  as  shown by Fig-
ures 3 through 10 and  the  ranking comparisons of improvement and accomplish-
ment as shown above.  Then investigations  should  be  conducted to determine
why some  states  or  reporting organizations produce better  precision  and
accuracy than others.  Appropriate  corrective  actions  should  then be taken
to improve the precision and accuracy of the reporting organizations having
the worst results.
                                     32

-------
                                 SECTION 4

                     RESULTS BY REPORTING ORGANIZATIONS
     Table 11 shows  the  total  number of Reporting  Organizations  reporting
data to EMSL in  1985.   By comparing  the  numbers between Tables 9  and  11,
one can see the  extra  effort  exerted by some of the State  and local  agen-
cies to provide  quality  assurance  information  in cases where  they  have no
SLAMS or NAMS sites.   There are an additional  2  reporting organizations  for
continuous S02,  3 for continuous N02, 1  for TSP, 4 for  Pb, 4 for manual  S02
and 5 for manual  N02.  The number of reporting organizations reporting data
for CO is 3  less than the number which should  have reported data.   Appar-
ently, these additional sites  are special  purpose monitoring sites or addi-
tional local sites not in the  SLAMS/NAMS network.
          TABLE 11.  NUMBER OF REPORTING ORGANIZATIONS HAVING DATA
                     IN THE PARS MASTER FILE FOR THE YEAR 1985
Automated
Region
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
Nation
CO
C42101
6
3
10
21
20
10
11
5
8
4
98
S02
C42401
6
3
12
28
26
11
9
4
7
3
109
pollutants
N02
C42602
4
2
11
14
13
10
5
3
7
2
71

03
C44201
6
2
12
30
25
10
10
3
8
2
108

TSP
111101
6
4
16
36
30
14
14
9
10
4
143
Manual pol
Pb
112128
5
3
9
15
17
11
8
3
7
4
82
lutants
SO 2
142401
0
0
0
5
0
1
0
0
1
0
7

N02
141602
0
0
0
3
1
1
1
0
0
0
6
     Appendix D shows the annual combined upper and lower probability limits
for each reporting  organization.   Each reporting organization  can compare
their values  with  those  of  other  reporting  organizations  and with  the
regional and national  values.  Also  given for each  reporting organization
are the following informational items:
                                     33

-------
     Continuous methods

     No. of SLAMS and NAMS sites
     No. of analyzers
     No. of precision checks
     No. of accuracy audits
Manual methods

No. of SLAMS and NAMS sites
No. of samplers
No. of collocated sites
No. of accuracy audits
     Any user of  monitoring data  from some  specific  site  and time  period
should obtain,  from the local air monitoring  agency,  the precision  and accu-
racy data for the specific sites  and time  periods  involved.
                                      34

-------
                                 SECTION 5

                      FURTHER EVALUATION OF PARS DATA
     Some  interesting  comparisons  can be made by considering the correspond-
 ing  national  averages  of Tables 6 and 7  and the 50-percentile values of the
 probability limits  of  Table 8.  Table 12 compares  these  limits by consider-
 ing  the  spread, or  range, of the limits.
     TABLE 12.  COMPARISON OF THE 50-PERCENTILE FREQUENCY DISTRIBU-
                TION VALUES WITH THE NATIONAL LIMIT VALUES FOR 1985

Manual methods
TSP
Pb
N02
S02
Precision
Accuracy*
Precision
Accuracy
Precision
Accuracy
Precision
Accuracy
Continuous methods
CO
03
N02
S02
Precision
Accuracy
Precision
Accuracy
Precision
Accuracy
Precision
Accuracy
National values
Lower
limit
-15
- 8
-18
-10
-27
2
-42
-18
- 9
- 8
-10
-11
-12
-13
- 9
-12
Upper
limit
16
8
19
8
29
5
35
9
9
8
9
9
12
12
7
12
Range
31
16
37
18
56
8
77
27
18
16
19
20
24
25
16
24
50-percentile
Lower
limit
-10
- 5
-10
- 5
-16
- 3
-33
- 9
- 6
- 5
- 8
- 7
-10
- 8
-11
- 8
Upper
limit
10
6
10
3
17
4
29
5
6
5
7
5
10
7
7
8
values
Range
20
11
20
8
33
7
62
14
12
10
15
12
20
15
18
16
*A11 accuracy values for all  pollutants are for Level  2.

                                      35

-------
MANUAL METHODS

     For the manual methods, 1n all  cases the spreads (ranges)  of the prob-
ability limits are  considerably greater  for  precision than for  accuracy.
These differences  are  consistent for  both the  National  averages  and  the
50-percentile values.  These same relationships also existed for all previ-
ous years.  This means that the short-term within-sampler variability (pre-
cision) is  larger  than the  variability  of accuracy  which would  normally
include variations between, or among, samplers as well as imprecision with-
in samplers.  This may seem contradictory at first, but giving consideration
to exactly how the results are obtained and what the results represent will
provide a rational explanation.

     TSP.  In the case of TSP, the precision results are obtained from col-
located sampler data.  They include  variability  from  the  sample collection
process, the  analytical  filter weighing  process,  the filter  handling  and
conditioning process,  and  also  the  flow rate  measurement  process;  whereas
the accuracy audit is a check  only  on  the flow rate measurement.  Further,
the collocated sampler results are  obtained  at  all  ambient concentrations
above 1 yg/m^, the detection limit  for  the method.  At  low  concentration
levels the  relative  variability is  greater than  at  higher concentrations.
The combined  effects  of  these  two  causes  explain   the  wider  limits  for
precision.

     Manual SO? and NO?.  Similar to the TSP  data,  the  precision  results
are obtained  from  collocated sampler data.   They  include variability from
the flow measurement,  absorbing solutions, sampling,  sample  handling,  and
storage effects  (stability)  of the  samples as well as  the laboratory ana-
lytical portion  of  the method;  whereas the accuracy  audit  is  a check only
on the  laboratory analytical portion  of the  method.  Further,  the collo-
cated sampler  results  are  obtained  at all ambient concentrations above the
detection limits  of the methods.   Many  of these  concentrations  are below
the concentrations  of  the  accuracy  audits.  At  lower  concentrations,  the
relative variability is greater than at higher concentrations.

     As noted  from Table 12, these differences are considerable, indicating
that only  a small portion  of  the  variability results  from the laboratory
analytical  part of the method.  A very considerable amount of variability of
the method  is  attributed to other portions  of  the measurement  process.  The
very wide limits of  uncertainty attributed  only to the imprecision  of these
methods strongly  emphasizes that the manual methods  should be replaced by
the continuous anlayzers.   Alternatively,  if any  reliance  is  to be placed
on individual  daily data from  the manual  methods,  all  of the various por-
tions of  the  measurement processes must  be  much more  closely controlled, if
possible.

     £b_.  The precision  estimates  for Pb are  obtained from the analysis of
duplicate  strips  from  the  same hi-vol  filter.  Consequently,  actual varia-
bility  of Pb  content across the length of  the  filter, filter handling (with
possible  loss of particulate),  variation in cutting  filter strips,  and the
                                      36

-------
extraction of real -world parti cul ate are involved in addition to the chemi-
cal analytical portion of the method.  The accuracy audit data are obtained
from the  chemical analysis  of  strips to which known amounts of water-solu-
ble Pb  salts have been  added and thus  do  not involve the other portions of
the measurement  process,  nor  do  they involve  real -world  parti cul ates.
     Further, similar to the other  manual  methods (TSP,  N02, and SOa), the
precision estimates are  obtained at all concentrations above the detection
limit.  Many  of these concentrations  are  less than those  of  the accuracy
audits.  At lower  concentrations, the  relative  variability is  expected to
be greater than at higher concentrations.

Manual Methods  (General).  To make  valid comparisons  of  the precision and
accuracy data,  such  comparisons  should be made at the  same concentration
levels.  Only then will it be possible  to determine whether the larger var-
iabilities of the precision  estimates  are  due to differences in concentra-
tion level  or  to  the larger  scope  of the  measurement  system  involved.

     Such comparison studies can be accomplished when the raw concentration
data are obtained from the  State and local agencies for each precision and
accuracy check as specified  by the proposed regulation revisions to Appendix
A of 40  CFR,  Part 58 promulgated March 19,  1986.  Now  only the reporting
organizations could perform such studies, since only they have the raw data
available.

     The estimation of the  magnitude  of the  contributions  of  the  various
sources of  variability  to  the  total  measurement  processes could  also  be
systematically studied in specially designed experiments.

CO, S02, N02, 03 (Continuous Methods).  The national  values  for  precision
for the  continuous methods  are   nearly  the  same as the accuracy  values  at
level 2.  For these  continuous  measurement methods,  the  precision  assess-
ments reflect the  within- instrument  variability  obtained  from  bi-weekly
checks at relatively low concentrations, namely
                        8-10 ppm for CO
                and   .08 -.10 ppm for S02, N02, and 03.
In comparison, the accuracy audits include between-instrument variability as
well as imprecision, but  are  conducted  at higher  (level  2)  concentrations.
                       15 - 20 ppm for CO
                      .15 -.20 ppm for SOe, N02, and 03.
Thus, the added  between-instrument  variability  for  the  level   2  accuracy
audit is almost exactly offset by the improved percentage within-instrument
variability for the precision.
                                     37

-------
     Level 1 accuracy audits are conducted at concentrations of

                      .03 -.08 for CO
                        3-8 for S02, N02, and 03.

     At Level 1,  concentrations  less than those for  the  precision checks,
the probability limits  for  accuracy  are wider  than  for  precision.   (See
Table 7.)

COMPARISON OF NATIONAL LIMIT VALUES AND 50-PERCENTILE  VALUES

     With reference again to Table 12, in all cases the spreads (ranges) of
the national values  for both precision  and  accuracy  are  greater  than  for
the corresponding 50-percentile  values.   For the continuous S02 method the
ranges of the national  values and the 50-percentile  values  are  nearly  the
same for 1985.  For  all  previous years the  ranges  for  the national  values
were wider than  for  the 50-percentile  values.   There are two  reasons  why
the spreads  of  the  national  values  are much wider than  the 50-percentile
values.  First, the  presence of significant differences  between  quarters
within reporting  organizations,  between  reporting  organizations  within
states, between states  within regions, and  between regions  cause  some  in-
crease in the total  variability over and above that which would be obtained
from only random  variability.   Second, the  national  values  are  unduly  in-
fluenced by  extreme  or  outlier  values.  If  there were  no significant dif-
ferences and  no  outlier  values, the  50-percentile  values  should closely
agree with the national  values.

     An evaluation of the shape of the distributions does in fact show that
the distributions are not normal due to an excessive number of extreme val-
ues (i.e., values in the tails of the distribution).

     All of  the distributions of the upper and lower probability limits are
generally symmetric  about zero.  The  only  exception  is  for  the  S02 meth-
ods.  For prior years  the  accuracy  audits  for  the manual  method and the
precision and accuracy  audits for the continuous  methods were biased neg-
atively.  For  1985,  the  accuracy audits  for the  manual method  is  still
biased negatively from  4  to 9 percent.  And,  the  precision checks for the
continuous method is  biased negatively from 2 to  4 percent.  However,  the
accuracy results  for the continuous method are unbiased.  A possible expla-
nation for  the negative  bias  for  precision  is  that  the  relatively  low
concentrations of S02  (0.08 0.10 ppm)  in  cylinders  specially prepared for
precision checks  may degrade after preparation.  These  biases for  S02 were
observed previously in the  1981, 1982, and 1983  data and  seem to be consis-
tent in magnitude and direction.  These consistent biases should be invest-
igated and corrected, if possible.

     A review of  Table  8 clearly shows  the  large  variability of  precision
data for  the manual  methods  and,  in particular, the presence  of  many ex-
treme values for  the  S02  and N02 methods.   Table 8 and  Figure 2 show more
variability  of  the accuracy audit results from  the continuous S02 and N02
methods than for  CO and 03.
                                     38

-------
     Based on  the percentiles  of  Table  8,   quarterly  probability  limit
values which exceed those listed in Table 13 should be considered excessive
or outlier values and  should  initiate  immediate investigation  to determine
and, hopefully,  correct  the  cause  of  such excessive values.   The  values
given in Table 13 are slightly tighter  in some cases than  the corresponding
values given in the report for the  1984 data.
        TABLE 13.  VALUES OF QUARTERLY PROBABILITY  LIMITS CONSIDERED
                   AS EXCESSIVE BASED ON 1985  DATA

Manual methods
TSP
Pb
NOa
S02
Continuous methods
CO
03
N02
SO?
Precision limits

± 26
± 35
± 50
± 70

± 15
± 17
± 27
± 20
Level

_..
± 20
± 13
± 21

± 25
± 25
± 44
± 28
Accuracy
1 Level

± 15
± 15
± 10
± 18

± 17
± 18
± 23
± 23
limits
2 Level 3

MW ••
	
± 9
± 15.

± 15
± 17
± 20
± 22
                                     39

-------
                                 SECTION 6

        COMPARISON OF  RESULTS FROM  THE  PARS  AND  THE  PA  AUDIT  PROGRAM
     A general comparison between the accuracy data of the PARS program and
the Performance Audit (PA)  data is included in this report.  The Performance
Audit data are the results of an independent check conducted by the Quality
Assurance Division (QAD)  of  the EMSL under the National  Performance  Audit
Program (NPAP).

     In the NPAP, specially prepared audit samples or devices are sent from
QAD to the participating  ambient air monitoring agencies.  The  samples  or
devices are carefully  and  accurately assessed by EMSL  utilizing  NBS  Stan-
dard Reference  Materials  (SRM's)  or standards.   The monitoring  agencies
analyze or measure the samples  or devices as  unknowns  or  blinds and report
their results to QAD for  evaluation.  Audit programs  are  conducted for the
following pollutant measurements, using the materials indicated:

                                                      Portion of measure-
Measurement           Audit materials                 ment system audited

S02 (manual)       Freeze-dried sodium sulfite         Chemical analytical
N02 (manual)       Aqueous sodium nitrite              Chemical analytical
Pb                Filter strip with lead nitrate      Chemical analytical
TSP               Reference flow device               Flow
CO                Cylinders containing CO gas         Continuous instrument
S02               Cylinder containing S02 gas         Continuous instrument

     The audit materials or  devices  are prepared  at three to six different
concentrations or flow levels.   Seoarate reports on  the  evaluation of the
PA data  are   published  by EMSL.6-9   Also, other reports10'11  have  dealt
with the use  of PA and PARS data.

     As indicated above,  the NPAP does  not yet  include  an  audit for the
ozone or continuous  N02 methods.  Therefore,  no  comparisons of the NPAP  or
PA data with  the PARS data are possible for those pollutants.

     Since precision  assessments are   not  made  in  the  PA  program,  only
accuracy can  be compared across the PARS and the PA programs.  For the pur-
pose of this  report, the results from PARS and the PA system are compared
at approximately  the same levels  by  matching laboratories  and  reporting
organizations.   (See Appendix E for a more detailed discussion of the prob-
lems involved in  comparing  the PARS and PA data.   Since  the PARS data are
presented with  outliers,  the same approach was taken  with  the audit data.
Knowledge of  the past  audit  data   reports,  however,  indicates  that  the
presence of outliers may make a significant difference in the audit results
for some agencies.
                                     40

-------
     Comparisons of the national  values  of the probability limits (Table 14)
exhibit fairly  good  agreement  between  the  results  of  the  two  programs.
Variations due to many  sources  of error for both data  sets  are  averaged to-
gether to obtain the  national values,  thereby  masking  any  correlations which
may have  existed  for the  results  of individual agencies.  There  is  consid-
erable variation between the results of the two programs when comparisons are
made on Regional and  reporting  organization  bases.   Lack of better agreement
results from several  factors.   First,  the  inclusion  of outlier values in the
PA and PARS  data appears  to have  introduced   some  excessive distortion  of
general trends.  Second, the concentration levels for  the  two  systems do not
coincide exactly at each   of the  audit  levels.   Third, the PA data  are the
results of  independent  external  audits, while  the PARS  accuracy data  are
based on the results of independent internal  audits.  The expected effects of
the last-mentioned  factor  would cause  the  spread of the limits for the PA to
be wider  than  that  for  the PARS.   Examination  of the  results  (see Table 14)
confirm these  expectations.  The  PA data for  1985 are  generally  better than
the corresponding data for 1984.
          TARLE 14.  SUMMARY COMPARISON OF EMSL PERFORMANCE AUDITS
                     (PA) vs. PARS ACCURACY AUDIT DATA FOR YEAR 1985
Pollutant
CO
PA
PARS
S02
PA
PARS
TSP
PA
PARS
Pb
PA
PARS
S02 (manual)
PA
PARS
N02 (manual)
PA
PARS
Audits

388
667

756
1326

3772
5928

432
777

15
55

15
40
National values
95% probability limits (%)
Level 1
Lower Upper

-14
-13

-20
-17




-16
-12

-24
-21

0
-20

10
13

26
14




16
9

25
20

3
20
Level 2
Lower Upper

-10 9
- 8 8

-18 22
-13 12

-10 12
- 8 8

-15 10
- 9 7

- 9 22
-10 12

- 0 7
-10 15
Level
Lower

- 8
- 8

-17
-13







- 1
-10

- 2
-14
3
Upper

9
7

20
12







9
11

4
19
     Comparisons of the 95 percent probability limits for the PA and the PARS
results by Region are  shown  in  Figures lla  through f for selected concentra-
tion levels.  The figures show considerable variation among Regions.
                                     41

-------
C(3.  (Figure lla)

     The width of the PARS probability limits for level 3 exceed those for PA
for six  of  the  ten  Regions.   The PARS  limits  are  considerably wider  for
Region VII  than  for other Regions.   For previous years, the  PA  limits have
generally been wider than the PARS limits.

JSP.  (Figure lib)

     For seven Regions, the width  of  the probability  limits  for PARS is less
than for PA.  This  may  be explained  by  the fact that  within  each reporting
organization the  flow rate  checks are  not as  completely  independent from
their internal standards  as  are the PA audits.  Regions  II  and IX have more
variability of PA audit data than other Regions.

N02 (manual).  (Figure lie)

     The variability  for  PARS  for  Region IV is  considerably larger  than for
1984

S02 (manual).  (Figure lid)

     Region IV PA data is about as variable for 1985 as for 1984.

Pb_.  (Figure lie)

     There  is considerable  variation in  the  results  from Region  to Region.
However, for  most Regions,  the PARS variability  is  considerably  less than
for PA.   This may  be explained by  the  fact  that the  local  independently-
prepared standards  for  PARS have  close  traceability  to the  materials used
for calibration,  whereas  the  standards  for PA,  since  they  are  prepared at
EMSL/RTP, are more completely  independent.

     Regions VI  and  VIII  results have much more  variability for  PA than the
other Regions,  indicating a need  for investigations to  determine the major
causes and  appropriate corrective actions.
                                     42

-------
IH
12
10
8
6
4
2


-2
-4
~ -6
1 -8
W
^^
3 -14
^ .1R
_
—
— -i
_


—
—


:I

1

•T




JL


•T
?A |l
1
1
1

T




1
j.


5ARS
•
|
1

T
1 -
1
I
1
j
j .
1
i
•
1
1

•






.

1


' '






.


1

rT -I
l


j

!
1


i
i

•
T




1


•
1
1 •
•T








•
i
»
l
•' ' 'co_
—
T T
T! T .-
1 -
1 T
l
j- 1 —
i !
i i _

—
t i i
00
-------
uu
20
10
0
-10
•20
•30
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 IN02
— —
_
T IT
1 ll
IT
PA 'PARS —
i
— o. —
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Figure 1 1c. Comparison of PA and PARS for manual N02 (level 3).
30
wll
| 20
E
MP
f/f
£ 10
§
_i
>• o
t- u
_j
5
2 -10
^3
oc
'•20
1 1 1 '
-


—
IT
1

i
J.
—
•' ' ' 1 ' ' 'so2
__

T
m~.





_ j_ —

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Figure 11d. Comparison of PA and PARS for manual SO2 (level 2).
uu
20
10
n
U
-10

-20
-30
-40
^f U

—
—



—
—


I

T
r i
i
i
i
±



|
i
I

T
1 -i
l
I
1
X



|
2
1

"T

i
\_



\
3
1

1
|
1



|
4
1

T
1
1
1


•
|
5
1

T 1
1
i
1


•
|
6
1


7
1
1



| -
7
11 1 Pb
—
hiii"
i i > —
k U-
l
—
—
.1 i i
8 9 10
                       REGIONS
    Figure 11e. Comparison of PA and PARS for Pb (level 2).
                         44
-------
2 (level 3).
                           45
-------
S02 (Continuous).  (Figure llf)

     Figure llf shows the  available  comparisons  of the PA and  PARS  data  for
the continuous S02 method.

     Regions IV, VI  and  VII show  considerably  more variation  of  PA results
than other Regions.  Except for Region  X, the data do not show the consistent
negative biases evident for previous years.

National Comparison

     Figure 12 gives  the  available  PA and PARS comparisons on a national basis
for all levels for each pollutant method.  For the continuous S02 method,  the
PA limits are consistently wider than  for PARS.   For CO, they are nearly  tte
same.
                                         the PA limits are  consistently  wider
                                         the  manual  S02  and  NO? methods  are
                                        of  the  limited  amount  of  data  for
     For the manual TSP and Pb methods,
than the PARS  limits.   The  results for
somewhat inconsistent,  partly  because
comparison.

Missing PA and PARS Comparisons.

     Comparsion of  the  results  from  PARS  and  PA are,  of  course,  possible
only when  the  data  are available  from  both  systems  for  paired  reporting
organization-laboratory combinations.    Paired  data  were  not available  for
140 comparisons.  Of  these,  data was  not available  because  of  missing data
from the PARS for 20 comparisons:
                            Reporting       Laboratory
      Region     State     organization       number

       II         VI          55001           310001
       IV         FL          10018           432002
                  NC          34003           418006
                  TN          44005           417001
       V          OH          36014           427008
       VII        MO          26003           438003
                  ME          28003           435002
       VIII       AZ          03200           447001
       IX         CA          05036           445003
                  HI          12120           348001
                  NV          29100           346001
                  NV          29200           446001
                  NV          29300           446002
                  GU          54100           349001
 *Also missing for 1984
**Also missing for 1983 and 1984
                                                           Pollutant(s)

                                                           S02,* TSP**
                                                           S02*
                                                           S02
                                                           CO
                                                           CO
                                                           Pb**
                                                           S02
                                                           S02
                                                           Pb**
                                                           CO, TSP, S02
                                                           CO**
                                                           CO, TSP
                                                           Pb*
                                                           S02,* TSP,**
                                                           S02 (manual)*
                                     46
-------
                        PROBABILITY LIMITS, percent
           CO     t

D.
O)
c-t_

o'
9L
c
(D
CO
00
CJI

-»

ISJ
CO

—

N)
CO

ro

—

Nl
CO


-•

ro

"
1 1 '

h_ _
1 	
, ^
j 1
U _
1
| 	
, ' H-r —

1 1
~ 1 	
H
i »-r--n
I 1
1 —
H_
t— «
1 	
i-
r , r-
I , '
U

1 ' I»---J
1 1
r , l^11
j 1 1 1 „
1 0_

— 1
h^HI 	 1
_,... 	 1 2 -o
1 g > —
' 1 1 1 " 1
1 1 . 1 1 „
1 o—

	 1
r1 i i i

	 i i i i \ z
	 1 ff-
-H
	 1 	 1, | ,
1 1 i I
i ">
_l N?-

«. — . — — 1 "~
	 1
^1 ~^~
1 1 1 1
' 1 ' ' ' -

— . -1
L-^ i , , -, ~
' \ 1 1 _,
, *> —
	 1 -a
1 1 1 1



n
0
z
^
**
c
o
f^
CO
5
m
i
0
LJ
CO




T>
2
C
J>
<:
m
-1
X
O
CO






-------
     Lack of laboratory participation  in the National Performance Audit Pro-
gram is the reason  there  is no paired data  available  for  135 cases compared
to 89  for  1984.   In  these cases, the laboratories  (reporting organization)
did not comply with the requirements  of  the federal  regulations.   In some of
these cases, the laboratory  requested the  audit  samples but  did  not report
any results.  A listing of missing PA audit  data follows:
       Region

        I

        II

        III
        IV
           Reporting
State     organization

 MA          22001
 NH          30001
 NJ          31001
 VI          55001
 DC          09001
 MD          21001
 MD          21003
 PA          39002
 PA          39003
 VA          48002
 WV          50002
 AL          01012
 AL          01013
 AL          01016
 FL          10001
 FL          10003
 FL          10004
 FL          10007
 FL          10011
 FL          10012
 FL          10014
 FL          10015
 FL          10017
 FL          10018
 FL          10020
 NC          34003
 TN          44001
 TN          44002
 TN          44003
 TN          44004
 TN          44005
 IL          14001
 IN          15005
 IN          15008
 IN          15009
 IN          15010
 IN          15100
Laboratory
number
304001
302001
308001
310001
312100
312001
412004
411002
411001
415005
314002
419001
419003

323005
323004
323008
323010
423003
423004
423005
423005
423001
423002


418006
317001
417004
417003
417002
417001
328001
429005
429004
429008
429011
329002

Pollutant
CO
CO
TSP
SO 2*
CO, TSP, Pb**
TSP
SO 2*
CO, Pb
CO, Pb
TSP
CO**
S02*
TSP,** S02*
TSP
CO,* S02
CO*
TSP
S02
CO, Pb
Pb, N02 (manual)
TSP, S02 (manual)
S02
CO,*, Pb,
S02,* CO,* Pb
CO, TSP, S02
S02
Pb
S02,* CO, Pb
CO,* Pb
CO*
TSP
CO, Pb
S02*
Pb*
TSP*
TSP,** Pb, S02
CO,* Pb*
                                                                   (continued)
                                      48
-------
                             Reporting
       Region     State     organization

        V          MI          23002
                   OH          36001
                   OH          36005
                   OH          36006
                   OH          36007
                   OH          36008
                   OH          36009
                   OH          36010
                   OH          36014
        VI         AR          04002
                   LA          19001
                   NM          32002
                   OK          37101
                   OK          37102
                   OK          37103
                   TX          45001
                   TX          45002
                   TX          45003
                   TX          45004
                   TX          45007
        VII        IA          16001
                   IA          16002
                   MO          26002
                   MO          26003
                   MO          26004
                   MO          26005
                   MO          26006
                   MO          26007
                   NE          28001
        VIII       CO          06001
                   MT          27002
                   MT          27004
        IX         AZ          03200
                   AZ          03300
                   CA          05004
                   CA          05036
                   CA          05061
                   HI          12120

                   NV          29100
                   NV          29200
                   NV          29300
                   GU          54100

        X          ID          13001
                   WA          49001

 *Also missing for 1984
**Also missing for 1983 and 1984
Laboratory
number
426001
327001
327006
427001
427002
427003
427004
427005
427008
332001
334001
430001
331002
431001
431002
333001
433002
433002
433004
433010
436001
436002
438004
438003
438002
438005




335001
344002
439001
439003
447001
447002
445001
445003
445002
348001

346001
446001
446002
349001

354001
352001

Pollutant
CO, Pb
CO, TSP
Pb
Pb**
CO
CO, Pb**
CO, TSP, Pb**
CO, Pb**
CO*
Pb
Pb,** CO
TSP
CO
CO,** Pb
TSP,** CO, PB
Pb,** CO
CO, Pb
CO, Pb
TSP**
TSP
CO
CO
CO, Pb
CO, TSP, Pb
TSP**
CO
TSP, CO
TSP, CO
TSP
Pb,** TSP**
CO*
CO
S02,* CO Pb
S02,* CO, Pb
CO, Pb
Pb*
S02*
CO,** S02, Pb
S02 (manual )
TSP
CO, TSP
TSP,** CO,* Pb*
TSP,** S02*
S02 (manual)
S02*
CO, Pb
                                     49
-------
     In 15 cases, data were unavailable from both PARS and PA:
                             Reporting       Laboratory
       Region     State     Organization       number

        II         VI          55001           310001
        IV         FL          10018           432002
                   NC          34003           418006
        V          OH          36014           427008
        VII        MO          26003           438003
        VIII       AZ          03200           447001
        IX         CA          05036           445003
                   HI          12120           348001
                   NV          29200           446001
                   NV          29300           446002
                   GU          54100           349001
 *Also missing for 1984
**Also missing for 1983 and 1984
Pollutant

S02*
S02*
S02
CO
Pb**
S02*
Pb**
CO, S02
CO, TSP
Pb*
TSP,** S02*
S02 (manual)
                                     50
-------
                                 SECTION 7

                      CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
     The results of PARS data for 1985 indicate some general improvement over
the data for  previous years.  However,  considerable  differences exist among
Regions and individual  reporting  organizations  for most measurement methods.
Investigations should be made  by  the Regions and the States to determine the
causes of these significant differences.

     The PA data for  TSP  and Pb show  more  variability  than for PARS.  These
differences are presumably due to the  fact  that  the  external  PA accuracy au-
dits are more  completely  independent than  the internal  PARS accuracy audits.
These differences  have  been  consistent  for past years  except that  in  1984
and 1985 the  differences  for continuous CO and  S02  have  been about the same
for PA and PARS.

     Further improvement  in  the  data  quality  assessments,  which are  mea-
sures of the  monitoring data quality,  can  be achieved only  through  contin-
uing efforts  of  State and local  agency  personnel  involved  (first-hand)  with
the operation  and  quality control  of  their  measurement systems.   Regional
QA Coordinators can  also  assist through their  review of the  operations and
quality control practices across the States in their Regions.

     Each Regional  QA Coordinator  should   evaluate  the  PARS  data from  all
the reporting  organizations  within  his Region  to  identify  those  organiza-
tions having  excessively  large variations  of probability  limits.   Investi-
gation should  be made to determine  the  causes  and correct  them to preclude
future excessive  deviations.   Similarly,   Regional  QA  Coordinators  should
review the  operations of  the reporting  organizations having  significantly
better precision and  accuracy results  in  order to identify  specific proce-
dures which should be uniformly  used throughout the  Region and  the Nation
to further  improve the reliability  of the monitoring  data in  the National
Aerometric Data Base.
                                     51
-------
                                 REFERENCES


1.   Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Part 58,  "Ambient Air Quality and
     Surveillance."

2.   Rhodes, R.C.  "Guideline on the Meaning and Use  of Precision and Accu-
     racy Data Required  by 40 CFR  Part  58, Appendices A  and B."   U.S.  En-
     vironmental  Protection Agency  Report, EPA 450/4-84-006.  Research  Tri-
     angle Park,  NC 27711.  June 1983.

3.   Evans, E.G., R.C. Rhodes, W.J.  Mitchell and J.C. Puzak.   "Summary of
     Precision and Acuracy Assessments for the  State and Local  Air  Monitor-
     ing Networks, 1982."  U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency  Report,  EPA-
     600/4-85-031.  Research Triangle Park, NC  27711.  April  1985.

4.   Rhodes, R.C. and E.G. Evans.  "Precision and Accuracy  Assessments for
     State and Local Air Monitoring  Networks, 1983."   U.S.  Environmental  Pro-
     tection Agency  Report,   EPA-600/4-86-012.   Research  Triangle  Park, NC
     27711.  February 1986.

5.   Rhodes, R.C. and E.G. Evans.  "Precision and Accuracy  Assessments for
     State and Local Air Monitoring  Networks, 1984."   U.S.  Environmental  Pro-
     tection Agency  Report,   EPA-600/4-86-031.   Research  Triangle  Park, NC
     27711.  August 1986.

6.   Rhodes, R.C., B.I. Bennett and  J.C.  Puzak.   "EPA's National  Performance
     Audit Program  for  Ambient Air Pollution Measurements."   In Proceedings
     of the  75th Annual  Meeting  of the  Air Pollution Control  Association,
     New Orleans, LA, June 1982.   Presentation  82-23.

7.   Lampe, R.L., B.F. Parr,  G. Pratt,  O.L. Dowler and W.J. Mitchell.   "Na-
     tional Performance  Audit Program:   Ambient  Air Audits  of Analytical
     Proficiency-1983."  U.S.   Environmental  Protection Agency   Report,  EPA-
     600/4-84-077.  Research Triangle Park, NC  27711.  October 1984.

8.   Parr, B.F.,  R.L. Lampe,  G. Pratt,  O.L. Dowler and W.J. Mitchell.   "Na-
     tional Performance Audit Program:   Ambient Air Audits  of Analytical  Pro-
     ficiency, 1984."  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency  Report,  EPA-600/
     4-86-013.  Research Triangle Park, NC 27711.   February 1986.

9.   Parr, B.F.,  R.L. Lampe,  G. Pratt,  O.L. Dowler and W.J. Mitchell.   "Na-
     tional Performance Audit Program:   Ambient Air Audits  of Analytical  Pro-
     ficiency, 1985.  U.S.  Environmental  Protection  Agency  Report,  EPA-600/
     4-86-xxx.  Research Triangle Park, NC 27711.   December 1986.
                                     52
-------
10.  Rhodes, R.C., W.J. Mitchell, J.C. Puzak and E.G. Evans.  "Comparison of
     Precision and Accuracy Estimates from State and  Local  Agency Air Monitor-
     ing Stations with Results of EPA's  National Performance Audit Program."
     Journal of Testing  and  Evaluation,  JTEVA, Vol.  13,  No.  5, September
     1985, p. 374-378.

11.  Thrall, A.D.  and C.S.  Burton.    "Special  Report,  Issues Concerning the
     Use of  Precision and  Accuracy  Data."   U.S.   Environmental  Protection
     Agency Report, EPA-450/4-84-006.   Research  Triangle Park, North Carolina
     27711.  February 1984.
                                       53
-------
                                 APPENDIX A

                                  GLOSSARY


State and Local Air Monitoring Stations (SLAMS) --  monitoring  stations  se-
lected by  the states  and  included in  the  State  Implementation  Plans.   The
stations and  the  plans  are  approved  by  the  Regional  Administrator.   The
purposes of the monitoring  are  to  determine  compliance to  the National  Ambi-
ent Air Quality  Standards  (NAAQS)  and to determine background  levels  of the
criteria pollutants.

National Air Monitoring Sites (NAMS) — a  subset  of  the SLAMS,  selected by
the states  in collaboration with  the Regional Offices  and approved  by the
Administrator.  The  purpose of the  sites  is  to  monitor in the  areas  where
pollution concentration and population exposure are expected to be highest in
terms of the  NAAQS.   Although,  in  actuality  the NAMS are a  subset of  SLAMS,
the NAMS  sites and  the  non-NAMS  SLAMS  sites  are often  referred to  as two
separate groups, the NAMS and SLAMS sites,  respectively.

Reporting Organization ~  a state,  or subordinate  organization  within the
state, that is  responsible  for  a  set  of  SLAMS stations, monitoring for the
same pollutant and for which PARS data can  be logically pooled (statistically
combined).  It  is  important to emphasize  that a  reporting  organization is
pollutant- and site-specific and is responsible for the sampling, calibration,
analysis, data quality assessment,  and reporting  of the monitoring  data for
the specific  pollutant.  It is  possible that a particular  SLAMS  station may
belong to two  different  reporting  organizations,  but the likelihood of  this
occurring is small.

Precision (Continuous Analyzers) — a measure  of  repeatability  obtained  from
repeated measurements of a  standard concentration in a  gas  cylinder and the
values indicated by the analyzer.  For S02,  NOa, and 03 analyzers,  the gas con-
centration used for the precision  check must be between 0.08 and 0.10 ppm and
for CO it must  be  between 8 and 10  ppm.  The data  from all  biweekly analyzer
checks for a  given  pollutant are  combined,  and 95% probability  limit  values
are reported  to  EPA each quarter  by  each  reporting  organization.   For  this
report, the quarterly  values for 1985 were  combined, and overall  95%  proba-
bility limits  were  calculated  for  each  reporting  organization,  for  each
Region, and for the nation,  as described in  Appendix  B.

Precision (Manual  Methods)  — a measure of  repeatability  for TSP, N02,  and
S02 manual  methods (bubblers) determined by  operating  collocated  samplers at
selected sites.  At  each collocated  site  one   sampler  is  designated as  the
"actual" sampler and  the other as  the "check"  sampler,  and the difference
between the two samplers provides  the  precision estimate.   For  Pb, precision
                                    A-l
-------
estimates are  obtained  by  analyzing  duplicate  strips  from  a  high  volume
filter sample collected  at a  site where  high  Pb  concentrations exist.   These
precision checks are made from  samples,  usually  taken every 6 days, and  are
reported quarterly.  The data  from  the manual methods  were calculated in  a
similar manner as the automated (continuous)  analyzers.

Accuracy (Continuous Analyzers)  ~   the  agreement  between  an  analyzer mea-
surement and  a  known audit  standard  concentration.   Accuracy  estimates  are
obtained at least once per year  for each  analyzer  by  introducing  blind audit
standards into  the  analyzer.  The  audit  samples  must  span  at least  three
concentration levels  and,  whenever  possible, must  be  traceable  to  NBS  or
other authoritative reference.  At least 25%  of the analyzers in each  report-
ing organization must be audited each quarter.  The percentage difference  for
each audit  concentration is  determined,  and the  average  for all  analyzers
checked within that quarter is calculated for each  level.   The standard devi-
iation for  each  level  is then  used to calculate  the 95%  probability  limits
for the reporting organization, which in turn are submitted quarterly  to EPA.
These quarterly values were combined to determine the annual values presented
here.  They  were calculated  in the  same manner  as described earlier  for
precision.

Accuracy (Manual Methods) --  the agreement between  an  observed or measured
value and a  known  or  reference  value.   For  N02  and S02 manual  methods,  the
accuracy of the analytical portion of the method is  assessed at three levels by
the analysis of known audit materials.  For Pb, the accuracy of the analytical.
portion of the method  is assessed at  two  levels.   For TSP,  the flow rate (or
air volume)  portion  of  the  method  is assessed  at the  nominal   flow  rate.

Compl eteness  ~  the  number  of the precision  and accuracy  checks  reported as
compared to  the  number that  should  have  been reported if all  checks had been
done in  accordance with the  regulations.  This value,  expressed  as  a per-
centage, is  not corrected  for  instances  where equipment  failure prevented
conducting the  check,  or for periods when monitoring data were invalidated.

National Ambient Air Audit Program  (NAAAP) —  an  external  performance audit
program conducted  by  EPA on State  and  local  agency  organizatons.   Organiza-
tions operating  SLAMS stations  are required to participate  in this  program
directed by  the Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory (EMSL) of the EPA
at Research  Triangle  Park,  NC.   In this  program,  blind  audit materials pre-
pared by  EMSL  are  sent to  participating  laboratories.   The  laboratories
analyze the  samples  and return the results to EMSL.  Shortly after the audit
is completed each  participant receives a  report that compares his performance
to that of all other participants.   The audit  materials for the manual  methods
for  S02,  N02 and Pb are used to evaluate the accuracy of only the  analytical
laboratory  portion of  the method, and  are  as  follows:

             Method            Audit Materials
             Manual  S02         Freeze-dried
             Manual  NO?         NaN02  solution
             Pb                 Filter strips spiked with Pb $04
                                    A-2
-------
The reference flow  device  used in the TSP  sampler audit evaluates  only  the
accuracy of the flow calibration.  However,  the CO and S02 continuous analyzer
audits evaluate the entire  measurement system.  As explained above, the exter-
nal NAAAP audits are conducted in essentially the same manner as the internal
audits (accuracy checks) for  the PARS program.  The  audits  for the Pb method
are conducted semi-annually and those for flow (TSP),  and continuous CO and S02
monitors are conducted at least once per year.
                                     A-3
-------
                                 APPENDIX B

                 FORMULAS FOR COMBINING PROBABILITY LIMITS
     Section 5.2, Annual Reports, of Appendix A  of  40  CFR Part 58 required
that simple  unweighted  arithmetic averages  of  the probability  limits  for
precision and  accuracy  from  the four  quarterly periods  of  the  calendar
year be  reported with  the  annual  SLAMS  report.  The   simple  unweighted
arithmetic averages  were  specified to  simplify  the  calculations  for  the
states.  Such limits would be essentially correct if only random variations
occurred between quarters within a  reporting organization  and between  re-
porting organizations within a state,  i.e., if no statistically significant
differences occurred between quarters  within reporting organizations or be-
tween reporting organizations within states.  However, experience has shown
that significant differences do  occur.   Because  of this fact,  it is most
correct to combine the  data  across  quarters and  across  reporting organiza-
tions within states  (and  also  across  states within regions  and  across  re-
gions within the  nation)  in  the manner  described  below.   These formulas
determine the  yearly probability  limits  for the  reporting  organization
which would  have been  computed from all  the  individual  percent difference
values, d-f,  obtained during the year.   To  accomplish  this,  from each quar-
terly pair of probability  limits, the average,TJ,  and standard deviation, Sa,
are back-calculated:

                        LL + UL
                    -= 	                           (D
                           2

                        UL - LL
                   S  = 	                           (2)
                    a   2(1.96)

where  LL = lower probability limit
       UL = upper probability limit

Except for the  effect of  the round-off of  the reported  probability limits
to integer values, the above equations determine the original D and Sa val-
ues used by  the  reporting organizations to compute the originally reported
limits.

     Yearly average, D,  and standard deivation,  S, values are computed from
the quarterly values as follows:
                                    B-l
-------
                   D =
                          (3)
where n-j = the number of individual  percent difference,  d-j,  values  for  each
           quarter
             S =
                   £(nrl)sf +. In
                              -  1
                          (4)
     The appropriate yearly probability limits  for  the  reporting  organiza-
tion are computed using the formulas:
                   UL = D + 1.96 S

                   LL = 5 - 1.96 S
                          (5)

                          (6)
NOTE:  The same formulas are used for combining yearly  reporting  organiza-
       tion limits into State limits, State limits  into Region  limits,  and
       Region limits into National  limits.

Example:  Suppose that the lower and upper  95% probability  limits for CO
          for precision for the four quarters of  a  year are:
                                            Lower
              Number of
Quarter    Precision Checks
                           Upper
                                         Probability    Probability
            Limit
                                                           Limit
1
2
3
4
10
9
13
7
-8
-5
-6
-12
+6
+9
+4
+11
for Quarter 1:
              LL + UL   -8+6
          D =
              UL - LL   6-(-8)
          S =
              2(1.96)   2(1.96)
= 3.6
                                        by equation (1)



                                        by equation (2)
     Similar computations for the other quarters, give values in the follow-
ing table.
                                    B-2
-------
             Quarter      _n       D       S       D-D

                1         10     -1       3.6      -0.78
                2          9+2       3.6       2.22
                3         13     -1       2.6      -0.78
                4          7     -0.5     5.9      -0.28
     Then

              TniDi
                                                        by equation (3)


              10(-1)  + 9(2)  + 13(-1)  + 7(-0.5)
                           39

              -8.5
              	 = -0.22
               39
           l) S+ In1(D1-D)
c =  /	                          by equation (4)
            (Ini) - 1


     f9(3.6)2+8(3.6)2+12(2.6)2+6(5.9)2+10(-0.78)2+9(2.22)2+13(-0.78)2+7(-0.28)2

                                   39 - 1
      510.30 + 58.90

            38


  = >/14.98   =  3.87


The upper and lower 95% probability limits are then computed as:

          UL = D + 1.96 S                               by equation (5)

             = -0.22 + 1.96(3.87)

             = 7.37 or 7 rounded off to nearest integer
                                    B-3
-------
          LL = D - 1.96 S                               by equation (6)
             = -0.22 - 1.96(3.87)
             = -7.81 or -8 rounded off to nearest integer
     In this particular example, the results by the weighted combined form-
ulas are very close to the simple unweighted arithmetic averages.  However,
in many cases the weighted combined formulas result in wider limits than
the simple unweighted arithmetic averages and more correctly reflect the to-
tal variability exhibited by the individual percent differences.
Alternate Method of Computation
     An alternate method which eliminates the need to compute U"-j - D, the
differences between the quarterly averages and the weighted annual average,
f ol 1 ows .
     1.  Compute TTj and Saj for each quarter according to equations (1) and
         (2) as above.
     2.  Compute for each quarter.
              zd = ni Ui                                            (7)
     3.  Compute for each quarter.
                9              7
              id2 = (r\i - 1) Sa^ + -                            (8)
                                    "i
     4.  Compute:
              zn-j  = the sum of n for all quarters                  (9)
              zzd  = the sum of zd for all quarters                 (10)
              zzd2 = the sum of zd2 for all quarters                (11)

     5.  Compute D according to equation (3) above, or
                  Eld
              D = —                                               (12)
                  zn
                                    8-4
-------
     6.  Compute S:
                             En
              S =  /	                                   (13)
                      (En) - 1

     7.  Then compute the probability limits, UL and LL, according to equa-
         tions (5) and (6).

Example

     The data for the previous example on page B-2 will be used.


Quarter
1
2
3
4

Number of
Precision Checks
10
9
13
7
Lower
Probability
Limit
-8
-5
-6
-12
Upper
Probability
Limit
+6
+9
+4
+11
         U.J and Saj are computed as before.  Compute Ed and Ed2 by equations
         (7) and (8) respectively.

              Quarter     n       "D"       S       Ed
1
2
3
4

10
9
13
7
— •
-1
+2
-1
-0.5

3.6
3.6
2.6
5.9

-10
+18
-13
-3.5
^575"
126.64
139.68
94.12
210.61

         For quarter 1:
                                 (sd)2
              Ed2 = (n - 1) $2 + 	                             (8)
                                   n

                                (-10)2
                  = (9)(3.6)2 + 	
                                  10

                  = 116.64 + 10

                  = 126.64
                                    B-5
-------
     2.  By equation (12):

                  EEd   -8.5
              D = — = 	
                  En     39

     3.  By equation (13):
= -0.22
the same as before
              S =
                     EEd2 -
                            (EEd)2
                              in
                       (zn) - 1
                                       (13)
                     571.05 -
 (-8.5)2

   39
              S =
                          39 - 1
                     571.05 - 1.85
                          38
                     3.87
            the same as before
     4.  The probability limits are then calculated as before using equa-
         tions (5) and (6).

A Second Example

     The following example more clearly shows computationally and graphi-
cally that the arithmetic averages of the quarterly upper and lower proba-
bility limits do not correctly reflect the total  variability when signifi-
cant differences occur between quarters.  Suppose the following individual
percent differences have been obtained for the precision checks for a con-
tinuous instrument during the past year.
          Quarter

             1
             2
             3
             4
  Individual Percent Differences

    -12, -9, -5, -5, -1, 2
      1, 4.5, 5, 5, 5.5, 9
     -6, 0, 5, 5, 10, 16
    -17, -14, -10, -10, -6, -3
From the previous formulas, the following IT, S,  and probability limits for
each quarter are calculated.
                                    B-6
-------
          Quarter      D       S       n        LL        UL
1
2
3
4
-5
5
5
-10
5.10
2.55
7.64
5.10
6
6
6
6
-15
0
-10
-20
5
10
20
0
                                             -11.25      8.75
                                              (-11)      (+9)

     As indicated above, the simple arithmetic averages of the lower and
upper probability limits are -11.25 and 8.75, or -11  and 9 when rounded-
off.

     The calculations of the annual probability limits by equations (3)
through (6) are shown below.


     EnD"   -30
 D = — = — = -1.25                                              (3)
     En     24
       E(n, - 1)S,2 + zn (fl-  _ 5)2
 S=  / - ] - ] - 1— 1 -                                  (4)
                    - 1
       5(5. 10)2+5(2. 55)2+5(7.64)2+5(5. 10)2+6(-3. 75)2+6(6. 25)2+6(6. 25)2+6(-8.75)2
                                      24 - 1
       (1596.961
        	 = 8.333
          23
               UL = D + 1.96 (S)                                    (5)

                  = -1.25 + 1.96 (8.333)

                  = 15.083 or (15)


               LL = D - 1.96 (S)                                    (6)

                  = -1.25 - 1.96 (8.333)

                  = -17.583 or (-18)
                                    B-7
-------
     The individual percent  differences,  the quarterly  probability limits,
the arithmetic annual  probability  limits  and the combined  annual  probabil-
ity limits are shown graphically on the following figure.
                  LLJ

                  cc
                  <
            LIMITS:
     ARITHMETIC AVERAGE
         COMBINED DATA
                                                    JU
                      L •   •
•  •
JU
                                 I
                                      ••
        I
      I

                    -20    -15    -10     -50      5     10

                                      PERCENT DIFFERENCE
                          15     20
     It is  clear from the above  figure that the  combined limits more cor-
rectly represent the  total  spread  of the  individual  percent differences
during the  year.  In fact,  the calculated values of  the  average and stan-
dard deviation  for all 24 of  the individual percent  differences are -1.25
and 8.333,  respectively,  which  are  in exact  agreement with  the prev-ious
calculations  as  they must be  because  of  the exact equality  of the mathe-
matical formulas involved.
                                     B-8
-------
            APPENDIX C



LISTING OF REPORTING ORGANIZATIONS
Region
01
01
01
01
01
01
02
02
02
02
03
03

03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04

No.
07
20
22
30
41
47
31
33
40
55
oa
09

21
21
21
21
21
39
39
39
48
48
48
48
50
50
01
01
01
01
01
01
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
State
Name
CONNECTICUT
MAINE
MASSACHUSETTS
NEW HAMPSHIRE
RHODE ISLAND
VERMONT
NEW JERSEY
NEW YORK
PUERTO RICO
VIRGIN ISLANDS
DELAWARE
DISTRICT OF
COLUMBIA
MARYLAND
MARYLAND
MARYLAND
MARYLAND
MARYLAND
PENNSYLVANIA
PENNSYLVANIA
PENNSYLVANIA
VIRGINIA
VIRGINIA
VIRGINIA
VIRGINIA
WEST VIRGINIA
WEST VIRGINIA
ALABAMA
ALABAMA
ALABAMA
ALABAMA
ALABAMA
ALABAMA
FLORIDA
FLORIDA
FLORIDA
FLORIDA
FLORIDA
FLORIDA
FLORIDA
FLORIDA
FLORIDA
FLORIDA

No.
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001

001
002
003
005
006
001
002
003
001
002
003
005
001
002
Oil
012
013
014
015
016
001
002
003
004
005
006
007
Oil
012
013
Reporting Organization
Name
AIR MONIT. SEC. DEPT. OF ENV. PROTECT.
BUREAU OF A.Q.C. DEPT. OF ENV. PROTECT.
DIV. OF AQC. DEPT. OF ENV. QUAL. ENG.
AIR RESOURCES AGENCY
DIV. OF A. HAZ. MAT. DEPT. OF ENV. MANAGE
AIR & SOLID WASTE PROGRAMS
DEPT. OF ENV. PROT., DIV. OF ENV. QUAL.
DEPT. OF ENV. CONSERV., DIV. OF AIR
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY BOARD
DEPT. OF CONS. AND CULTURAL AFFAIRS
STATE OF DELAWARE, DNR & EC
WASHINGTON, DC DC & RA

STATE OF MARYLAND
ALLEGANY COUNTY
ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY
BALTIMORE COUNTY
PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY
PENNSYLVANIA DER
ALLEGHENY CO. BAPC
PHILADELPHIA AMS
VIRGINIA STATE AIR POLL. CONTROL BOARD
CITY OF ALEXANDRIA
FAIRFAX COUNTY
ROANOKE COUNTY
STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA
WVA NORTHERN PANHANDLE REGIONAL OFFICE
ALABAMA DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL MGT.
AL, JEFFERSON CNTY. BUREAU OF ENV. HLTH.
AL DEPT. OF ENV. MANAGEMENT - MOBILE
AL, HUNTSVILLE AIR POLL. CONTROL DEPT.
AL, TRICOUNTY DIV. OF AIR POLL. CONTROL
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY - ALABAMA
FDER, NORTHWEST DISTRICT
FDER, NORTHEAST DISTRICT
FDER, ST. JOHNS RIVER DISTRICT
FDER, SOUTHWEST DISTRICT
FDER, SOUTH FLORIDA DISTRICT
FDER, SOUTHEAST FLORIDA DISTRICT
FDER, NORTHEAST DISTRICT BRANCH OFFICE
FL, JACKSONVILLE BIO-ENV. SERVICES DIV.
FL, HILLSBOROUGH CO., ENV. SERVICES DIV.
FL, PINELAS CO. DEPT. OF ENV. MANAGEMENT
                C-l
-------
Region
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05

No.
10
10
10
10
10
11
18
18
18
25
34
34
34
34
42
44
44
44
44
44
44
14
14
14
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
23
23
24
36
36
36
36
36
36
36
36
36
36
36
36
36
State
Name
FLORIDA
FLORIDA
FLORIDA
FLORIDA
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
KENTUCKY
KENTUCKY
KENTUCKY
MISSISSIPPI
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH CAROLINA
SOUTH CAROLINA
TENNESSEE
TENNESSEE
TENNESSEE
TENNESSEE
TENNESSEE
TENNESSEE
ILLINOIS
ILLINOIS
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
INDIANA
INDIANA
INDIANA
INDIANA
INDIANA
INDIANA
INDIANA
MICHIGAN
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
OHIO
OHIO
OHIO
OHIO
OHIO
OHIO
OHIO
OHIO
OHIO
OHIO
OHIO
OHIO
OHIO

No.
014
015
016
017
018
010
001
002
003
100
001
002
003
004
001
001
002
003
004
005
006
001
002
003
001
002
003
005
008
009
010
100
001
002
001
001
002
003
004
005
006
007
008
009
010
012
013
014
Reporting Organization
Name
FL, MANATEE COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT
FL, SARASOTA CO. AIR POLL. CONTROL DIV.
FL, PALM BEACH COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT
FL, BROWARD CO. ENV. QUAL. CONTROL BOARD
FL, DADE CO. DEPT OF ENV. RESOURCES MGT.
GEORGIA AIR QUAL. EVALUATION SECTION EPD
KENTUCKY DIV. OF AIR POLL. CONTROL
KY, JEFFERSON CO. AIR POLL. CONTROL DIST.
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY - KENTUCKY
MISSISSIPPI BUREAU OF POLLUTION CONTROL
NC NATURAL RESOURCES & COMMUNITY DEVEL.
NC, FORSYTH COUNTY ENV. AFFAIRS DEPT.
NC, MECKLENBURG CO. DEPT. OF ENV. HEALTH
NC, WESTERN REGIONAL AIR POLL. CONTROL
SC DEPT. OF HEALTH & ENV. CONTROL
TENNESSEE DIV. OF AIR POLL. CONTROL
TN, MEMPHIS-SHELBY CO. HEALTH DEPARTMENT
METRO HEALTH DEPT. NASHVILLE-DAVIDSON CO.
TN, KNOX COUNTY DEPT. OF AIR POLL. CONTROL
TN, CHATTANOGGA-HAMILTON CO. AIR POLL. CONT
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY - TENNESSEE
DIV. OF AIR POLL. CONT., ILLINOIS EPA
CHICAGO DEPT. OF CONSUMER SERVICES
COOK COUNTY DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONT.
AIR POLL. CONT. DIV. OF INDIANA STATE
DIV. OF AIR POLL. CONT., EVANSVILLE
ST. JOSEPH COUNTY
AIR POLL. CONT. DIV., VIGO COUNTY
INDIANAPOLIS APC DIVISION
ANDERSON LOCAL AGENCY
PORTER COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT
LAKE COUNTY CONSOLDTD. AQ MONIT. WRK. GRP.
AIR QUAL. DIV., MI DEPT. OF NAT. RES.
AIR POLL. CONT. DIV., WAYNE COUNTY
MINNESOTA POLL. CONT. AGENCY, AIR MO
OHIO EPA, CENTRAL DISTRICT OFFICE
OHIO EPA, NORTHEAST DISTRICT OFFICE
OHIO EPA, NORTHWEST DISTRICT OFFICE
OHIO EPA, SOUTHEAST DISTRICT OFFICE
OHIO EPA, SOUTHWEST DISTRICT OFFICE
AKRON AIR POLLUTION CONTROL
AIR POLL. CONT. DIY., CANTON CITY
SOUTHWESTERN OHIO AIR POLL. AGENCY
CLEVELAND DIV. OF AIR POLL. AGENCY
REGIONAL APC AGENCY, DAYTON
AIR POLL. CONT. DIV. OF LAKE COUNTY
AIR POLL. UNIT, PORTSMOUTH CITY
NORTH OHIO VALLEY AIR AUTHORITY
C-2
-------
Region
05
05
05
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
08
08
08
08
08
08
08
08
08
09
09
09
09
09
09
09

No.
36
36
51
04
04
19
32
32
37
37
37
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
16
16
16
17
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
28
28
28
06
27
27
27
27
35
43
46
52
03
03
03
05
05
05
05
State
Name
OHIO
OHIO
WISCONSIN
ARKANSAS
ARKANSAS
LOUISIANA
NEW MEXICO
NEW MEXICO
OKLAHOMA
OKLAHOMA
OKLAHOMA
TEXAS
TEXAS
TEXAS
TEXAS
TEXAS
TEXAS
TEXAS
IOWA
IOWA
IOWA
KANSAS
MISSOURI
MISSOURI
MISSOURI
MISSOURI
MISSOURI
MISSOURI
MISSOURI
NEBRASKA
NEBRASKA
NEBRASKA
COLORADO
MONTANA
MONTANA
MONTANA
MONTANA
NORTH DAKOTA
SOUTH DAKOTA
UTAH
WYOMING
ARIZONA
ARIZONA
ARIZONA
CALIFORNIA
CALIFORNIA
CALIFORNIA
CALIFORNIA

No.
015
016
001
001
002
001
001
002
101
102
103
001
002
003
004
005
006
007
001
002
003
001
001
002
003
004
005
006
007
001
002
003
001
001
002
003
004
001
001
001
001
100
200
300
001
004
036
061
Reporting Organization
Name
TOLEDO POLL. CONTROL AGENCY
MAHONING TRUMBULL AIR POLL. CONTROL
HI. DEPT. OF NAT. RES., AIR MONIT. UNIT
DEPT. OF POLL. CONT. & ECOLOGY CONT. MON
DEPT. OF POLL. CONT. & ECOLOGY
DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES, NEW ORLEANS
ENV. IMPROVEMENT DIV., SANTA FE
CITY OF ALBUQUERQUE ENV. HEALTH DIV.
OK STATE DEPT. OF HEALTH
OKLAHOMA CITY-CNTY. HEALTH DEPT.
TULSA CITY-CNTY. HEALTH DEPT.
TEXAS AIR CONTROL BOARD
DALLAS ENV. HEALTH & CONSERVATION DEPT.
EL PASO CITY-CNTY. HEALTH DEPT.
FT. WORTH PUBLIC HEALTH DEPT.
GALVESTON COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT
HOUSTON DEPT. OF PUBLIC HEALTH
SAN ANTONIO METRO. HEALTH DISTRICT
POLK COUNTY PHYSICAL PLANNING
LINN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT
UNIVERSITY HYGIENIC LABORATORY
STATE OF KANSAS
LABORATORY SERVICES PROGRAM
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
ST. LOUIS CITY
KANSAS CITY
SPRINGFIELD
AMAX LEAD CO. OF MO, BOSS, MO
ST. JOE LEAD CO., HERCULANEUM, MO
STATE OF NEBRASKA
LINCOLN
OMAHA
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
MT AIR QUAL. BUREAU, DEPT. OF H&ENV.
YELLOWSTONE CNTY. AIR POLL. CONT. AGY.
GREAT FALLS CITY-CNTY. HEALTH DEPT.
MISSOULA CITY-CNTY HEALTH DEPT.
STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
DEPT. OF HEALTH, DIV. OF ENV. HEALTH
STATE BUREAU OF AIR QUALITY
DEPT. OF ENV. QUAL., AIR QUAL. DIV.
ARIZONA DEPT. OF HEALTH SERVICES
MARICOPA COUNTY
PIMA COUNTY
CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD
BAY AREA AIR QUAL. MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
SAN DIEGO AIR POLL. CONTROL DISTRICT
SOUTH COAST AIR QUAL. MANAGEMENT DIST.
C-3
-------
               State                         Reporting Organization
Region   No.      Name          Wo.               Name

  09     05    CALIFORNIA       061   SOUTH COAST AIR QUAL. MANAGEMENT DIST.
  09     12    HAWAII           120   STATE OF HAWAII, DEPT. OF HEALTH
  09     29    NEVADA           100   NEVADA DIV. OF ENV. PROTECTION
  09     29    NEVADA           200   WASHOE COUNTY
  09     29    NEVADA           300   CLARK COUNTY
  09     54    GUAM             100   GUAM EPA
  10     02    ALASKA           020   DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION
  10     13    IDAHO            001   DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND WELFARE
  10     38    OREGON           001   DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
  10     49    WASHINGTON       001   DEPT. OF ECOLOGY
                                     C-4
-------
                                  APPENDIX D

            PRECISION AND ACCURACY DATA BY REPORTING ORGANIZATION
NOTE:  In Tables D-l  through  D-8,  the number of accuracy  audits  listed  con-
       sider each audit level  as a separate audit.  For example,  consider  CO
       audits for Massachusetts, Reporting Organization 22001.   The number  of
       audits is 12, which would  indicate that four CO instruments were au-
       dited at each of the three levels.   Also,  the number of  analyzers  (NO.
       ANALYZERS),  number of samplers (NO. SAMPLERS) and number of collocated
       sites (NO. COLL.  SITES) have  been summed  across  the  four  quarters,
       thereby being four times the actual number.  In those cases  where the
       numbers given are not multiples of  four,  the number of analyzers,  sam-
       plers, or sites were not the same for  all  four quarters.
                                    D-l
-------
 Explanation of Column Heading Abbreviations for Tables D-l, D-2, D-3, D-4
                            (Continuous Methods)
     Column
No.    Heading abbreviation
 1     REP. ORG.
       STATE
       REGION
 2     NO. SITES  SLAMS
 3     'NO. SITES  NAMS
 4     NO. ANALYZERS
 5     NO. PRECISION CHECKS

       PROBABILITY LIMITS
            Explanation
6
7
8
9

10
11

12
13

14
15

16
17
LOW
UP
NO. AUDI
NO. AUDI
LEVEL 1
LOW
UP
LEVEL 2
LOW
UP
LEVEL 3
LOW
UP
LEVEL 4
LOW
UP
Reporting organization SLAMS number
Two letter state abbreviation
EPA regional office number (RGO#)
Number of SLAMS sites, not including NAMS
Number of NAMS sites
Number of analyzers
Number of precision checks performed and
reported
Probability limits
Lower probability limits
Upper probability limits
Number of accuracy audits per
Number of audits of level 4

Lower probability limits
Upper probability limits

Lower probability limits
Upper probability limits

Lower probability limits
Upper probability limits

Lower probability limits
Upper probability limits
    D-2
-------
                        TABLE  D-l.    CO  PRECISION  AND ACCURACY  ANNUAL  VALUES
                                         FOR REPORTING ORGANIZATIONS
                                                    AUTOMATED ANALYZERS
                          --------------- PRECISION ---------------       ------------------------- ACCURACY -------------------------
REP.ORG./  NO.   SITES                     NO.        PROBABILITY               NO.  AUDITS  ---------- PROBABILITY LIMITS ----------
STATE/    ------------        NO.        PRECISION       LIMITS            NO.    AT  LEVEL   LEVEL  1  LEVEL   2  LEVEL  3  LEVEL  4
REGION    SLAMS   NAMS     ANALYZERS      CHECKS      LOH      UP       AUDITS      4      LOU   UP  LOU   UP  LOU   UP  LOU   UP
07001        50           ZO           1*1      -10     +09           6        0     -06  +1*  -OS +05  -02  +03
XXCT         50           20           141      -10     +09           6        0     -06  +14  -05 +05  -02  +03

20001        10           4            42      -02     +08           4        0     -02  +10  -07 +11  -10  +11
XXME         10           4            42      -02     +08           4        0     -02  +10  -07 +11  -10  +11

22001        44           32           248      -03     +09          12        0     -06  +13  -07 +12  -08  +09
KXMA         44           32           248      -03     +09          12        0     -06  +13  -07 +12  -08  +09

30001        20           8           195      -06     +06           9        0     -11  +09  -06 +07  -02  +06
x«NH         20           8           195      -06     +06           9        0     -11  +09  -06 +07  -02  +06

41001        02           8           123      -06     +04          11        0     -01  +06  -03 +02  -03  +03
XKRI         02           8           123      -06     +04          11        0     -01  +06  -03 +02  -03  +03

47001        10           4            42      -07     +04           4        0     -11  +09  -07 +07  -06  +10
XXVT         10           4            42      -07     +04           4        0     -11  +09  -07 +07  -06  +10

XR601        13     6           76           791      -06     +08          46        0     -07  +11  -06 +08  -05  +07

31001        12     2           56           384      -09     +09          28        0     -08  +13  -04 +10  -08  +10
XXNJ         12     2           56           384      -09     +09          28        0     -08  +13  -04 +10  -08  +10

33001        67           52           465      -07     +04          69        0     -11  +10  -06 +06  -03  +03
XXNY         67           52           465      -07     +04          69        0     -11  +10  -06 +06  -01  +03

40001        12           10           105      -03     +10           7        0     -05  +10  -08 +09  -08  +10
XXPR         12           10           105      -03     +10           7        0     -05  +10  -08 +09  -08  +10

XRG02        19    11         118           954      -08     +07         104        0     -10  +11  -06 +08  -05  +05

°»°°1        10           8            54      -06     +10           8        0     -07  +16  -07 +08  -04  +08
XXDE         10           8            54      -06     +10           8        0     -07  +16  -07 +08  -04  +08

09001        02           9            59      -02     +03           4        0     +00  +06  -02 +01  -02  +00
             02           9            59      -02     +03           4        0     +00  +06  -02 +01  -02  +00
             42          25           304       -05     +05           24        0      -07  +08  -06  +04  -05  +04
"""TO         42          25           304       -05     +05           24        0      -07  +08  -06  +04  -05  +04
             5     »          85           549       -06     +10           24        0      -15  +08  -12  +04  -12  +05
             12           8           108       -07     +02           10        0      -05  +01  -02  +03  -03  +04
             42          22           128       -08     +06            8        0      -12  +10  -09  +09  -09  +07
**p*        I'     4         115           785       -08     +09           42        0      -13  +07  -II  +06  -10  +06

*80°1        52          32           239       -05     +05            8        0      -05  +04  -07  +03  -07  +03
*80"        30          16            94       -08     +07           13        0      -04  +04  -03  +05  -03  +09
•"*'*         82          48           333       -06     +06           21        0      -05  +04  -05  +05  -06  +08

50001        10           8            47       -19     +05            3        0      -10  +03  -04  +00  -08  -02
50002        10           8            93       -10     +07            6        0      -14  -03  -06  +02  -06  +02



                                                                                               (continued)


                                                             D-3
-------
TABLE  D-l   (Continued)
       AUTOMATED  ANALYZERS
REP.OR6.
STATE/
REGION
•KUV
MKG9S
81812
K*AL
10061
10993
18811
18812
10813
19816
19017
19918
15326
KKFl
111)10
KKGA
18901
18892
«*KY
25180
**«*
34881
34862
34863
KCHC
*Z801
a»5e
44982
4--M5
44894
44805
K»TN
KRS04
14081
14863
XMIL
15661
15982
15898
15196
*«IN
23991
23892
K»HI
/ NO.

SLAMS
2
25
3
3
1
8
3
3
2
1
3
2
2
17
4
4
7
1
8
1
1
4
2
3
f
2
S
3
£
1
1
8
52
8
4
12
1
1
3
2
7
*
4
8
SITES
._» 	
NAMS
8
18
2
2
i
0
2
2
2
8
2
2
6
19
2
2
9
2
2
8
8
f
i
I
2
8
8
2
2
S
6
4
22
1
1
2
2
0
0
i
t
0
2
2

NO.
ANALYZERS
16
221
16
H
4
2
20
20
16
4
19
16
6
107
17
17
24
12
Si
4
4
IS
8
20
43
8
i
20
IK
4
f
42
273
36
20
56
12
4
11
9
36
20
17
57
NO.
PRECISION
CHECKS
140
1.675
93
93
48
17
342
145
112
48
114
173
46
1.837
208
208
157
76
233
36
36
91
60
124
275
52
92
123
105
29
J
257
2.191
324
160
484
66
22
65
45
198
135
£41
219
PROBABILITY
LIMITS
LOU
-14
-08
-10
-18
-15
-28
-10
-07
-04
-08
-07
-08
-24
-18
-11
-11
-06
-17
-11
-04
-04
-09
-07
-04
-87
-12
-12
-03
-06
-07
W
-05
-10
-13
-09
-12
-13
-09
-15
-14
-11
-07
"IB
-10
UP
+07
+88
+89
+89
+11
+10
+07
+04
+05
+02
+06
+08
+14
+88
+82
+82
+87
+87
+89
+05
+85
+06
+06
+05
+85
+87
+87
+t4
484
+05
If?
+04
+07
+06
+87
+86
+88
+89
+83
409
+07
+83
+15
+89
                                 NO.  AUDITS	PROBABILITY LIMITS	—	•
                           NO.    AT  LEVEL   LEVEL  1  LEVEL  Z  LEVEL   3   LEVEL  4
                         AUDITS      4      LOU   UP  LOM   UP  LOU   UP   LOU   UP
108

 26
 28

  8
  1
 15
  6
 19
  6
  8
 11
  4
 76

  6
  6

 24
  5
 29

  4
  4

 18
  8
 23
 49

 52
 32

 SB
 29
  8

 75

311

  9
  8
 17

 14
 12
 11
  8
 45

  8
  7
 15
                                            -14  +01  -OS  +01  -68  +01

                                            -11  +09  -Oft  +05  -08  +06

                                            -19  +12  -16  +10  -17  +12
                                            -19  +12  -16  +11  -S7  +12

                                            -11  +11  -07  +09  -13  +14
                                             -11  +16  -0
                                                           +68  -08  +9*
                                             -16  +96  -12  +64  -07  +94
                                             -IS  +11  -18  +05  -88  +86
                                             -Z8  +21  -13  410  -12  +6S
                                             -18  +47  -08  +23  -84  414
                                             -28  +2*  -16  +19  -15  +16
                                             -11  +22  -14  +15  -17  488
                                             -18
                                                      -It  412  -10  410
                                             -SO  -06  -12  403  -07  405
                                             -3«  -96  -12  403  -07  +85

                                             -11  +21  «S6  +08  -05  484
                                             -17  +66  -09  +07  -87  +65
                                             -14  +20  -07  497  -06  405

                                             -08  +64  -04  +00  -11  +64
                                             -08  +04  -04  +00  -11  4JH

                                             -08  46g  -OS  +06  -OS  +85
                                             -06  +13  -85  408  -§4  +34
                                             -07  +86  -OS  +96  -01  +04
                                             -01  498  -04  +98  -S3  Ȥ5

                                             -18  +13  -11  +8?  -18  +85
                                             -18  +13  -11  +9?  -18  +8S

                                             -87  +10  -65  +87  -82  +«»
                                             -88  +05  -07  +65  -66  48«
                                             -09  484  -S3  +8S  -65  4§S
                                             ft?  W  111  !»»  f!?  Ttt
                                             -OS  +86  -06  +86  -94  4«4

                                             -IS  414  -IS  +89  -88  +87
                                             -13  411
                                             -68  +66
                                             -10  +08

                                             -21  +84
                                             -IS  +11
                                             -97  *96
                                             -31  +14
                                             -29  +11

                                             -11  +10
                                             -13  +19
                                             -12  +14
-05  *St
-95  +95
-65  +66

-97  +11
-6*  +69
-85  +85
-89  +15
-08  +1®

-11  +07
-11  *69
-11  +SS
-65  *84
-65  403
-85  +05

-05  412
-10  +68

-96  +11
-97  *10

-12  *8?
-96  486
-99  467
                                                   (continued}
                 D-4
-------
                                                 TABLE D-l  (Continued)
                                                     AUTOMATED ANALYZERS
REP.ORG.
CT A TC y
9 1 A 1 C'
REGION
24001
XXMN
36001
36006
36007
36008
16009
36010
36012
36014
36015
36016
XXOH
51001
XXUI
KR605
19001
HULA
32001
32002
XXNM
37101
37102
37103
XXOK
45001
45002
45003
45006
XIITX
XRG06
16001
16002
16003
XMIO
17001
XNKS
26001
2*002
26003
26004
26005
XKHO
/ NO.
SLAMS
5
5
1
(
1
3
1
0
1
1
2
1
10
5
5
47
1
1
4
3
7
2
1
2
4
3
1
1
1
5
17
2





0
4
0
2
1
7
SITES
NANS
2
2
2
2
0
2
2
2
t
1
•
0
It
2
2
20
2
2
0
2
2
0
2
0
2
5
2
1
1
8
14
•
1
8
8
8
8
1
8
2
1
8
4

NO.
ANALYZERS
1*
1«
12
8
4
17






74
28
28
250
12
12
15
If
34
8
8
8
24
48
8
4
8
48
138
11
3
3
17
12
12
7
20
8
14
5
54
	 FRtCISION-
NO.
PRECISION
CHECKS
349
34*
67
52
26
102
54
4*
30
10X
79
18
487
187
187
1.924
81
81
87
99
184
48
58
47
153
1.728
61
22
51
1.862
2.282
184
18
15X
137
64
44
46
137
52
79
38
344
PROBABILITY
LIMITS
LOU UP
-08
-88
-08
-09
-11
-13
-04
-10
-08
+80
-05
-04
-18
-87
-87
-18
-12
-12
-11
-08
-89
-18
-88
-05
-08
-88
-08
-07
-18
-08
-88
-11
-15
-83
-12
-84
•84
-15
-16
-15
-08
-05
-14
+88
+88
+14
+84
+88
+12
+86
+81
+85
+15
+83
+86
+89
+89
+89
+88
+07
+87
+09
+87
+08
+12
+13
+86
+11
+89
+11
+84
+03
+89
+89
+84
+85
+11
+87
+18
+18
+11
+18
+21
+08
+11
+15
28002
                                            44
                                                     -06
                                                            +16
	ACCURACY	
        HO.  AUDITS  	PROBABILITY  LIMITS	
  HO.     AT  LEVEL   LEVEL  1  LEVEL  2  LEVEL  3  LEVEL  4
AUDITS      4       LOU   UP  LOU   UP  LOU   UP  LOU   UP

                   -15  +13  -14  +07  -05  +04
                   -15  +13  -84  +07  -05  +04

                   -18  +19  -87  +12  -05  +15
                   -11  +14  -04  +08  -82  +08
                   -18  +04  -08  +06  -08  +04
                   -04  +11  -IS  +07  -09  +04
                   -12  +17  -08  +06  -05  +04
                   -29  +22  -13  +11  -06  +05
                   -04  +18  +00  +05  -05  +04

                   -11  +01  -08  +01  -03  +02
                   -05  +04  -03  +05  -04  +03
                   -13  +14  -87  +08  -07  +07

                   -11  +21  -04  +09  -04  +05
                   -11  +21  -06  +09  -04  +05

                   -16  +14  -07  +18  -87  +87

                   -13  +81  -18  +14  -18  +87
                   -13  +01  -It  +04  -08  +07

                   -07  +11  -14  +17  -17  +17
                   -12  +17  -19  +16  -17  +19
                   -11  +18  -88  +17  -1]  +19

                   -SS  +15  -27  +19  -25  +18
                   -12  +13  -18  +19  -18  +89
                   -18  +09  -05  +03  -01  +03
                   -16  +13  -13  +10  -11  +10

                   -29  +24  -14  +15  -12  +12
                   -15  +08  -14  +11  -13  +10
                   -05  +06  -01  +04  +00  +04
                   -11  +10  -06  +04  -04  +03
                   -19  +14  -18  +10  -09  +09

                   -14  +12  -18  +88  -11  +19

                   -14  +19  -16  +02  -11  +03
                   -14  +04  -15  +01  -09  +05
                   -22  +03  -08  -II  -13  +11
                   -14  +16  -06  +01  -17  +15

                   -21  +34  -17  +11  -17  +89
                   -21  +34  -17  +11  -17  +19

                   -It  +16  -1*  +15  -17  +18
                   -25  +15  -11  +19  -19  +05
                   -41  +25  -22  +13  -23  +09
                   -10  +08  -18  +06   -11  +02
                   -0«  +15  -03  +07   -04  +06
                   -22  +18  -12  +11   -14  +09

                   -11  +19  -18  +81  -18  +12
16
16
5
5
5
6
4
4
5
OX
4
4
46
18
It
149
12
12
12
14
26
4
12
9
25
18
6
4
8
28
91



2







32
8
1
t
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
t
8
8
8
8
t
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
t
t
8
8
8
                                                                                                  (continued)
                                                               D-5
-------
                                               TABLE  D-l  (Continued)
                                                      AUTOMATED ANALYZERS
                          --------------- PRECISION ---------------        ------------------------- ACCURACY -------------------------
REP.ORG./  NO.   SITES                      NO.         PROBABILITY                NO. AUDITS  ---------- PROBABILITY  LIMITS ----------
STATE/    ------------        NO.        PRECISION      LIMITS             NO.    AT LEVEL   LEVEL  1   LEVEL   2   LEVEL  3  LEVEL  4
REGION    SLAMS   HAMS     ANALYZERS      CHECKS       LOU      UP        AUDITS      4       LOU   UP   LOU   UP   LOU   UP  LOU   UP
28003         t     *            3            28       -08     +07            4        0      -08  +03   -07  +03   -05  +02
*»n          30           13            74       -Oi     +0*           12        0      -12  +07   -06  +02   -09  +03

«R607        17-4           94           (If       -12     +13           if        0      -1»  +15   -10  +07   -10  +07

04001        11     2           51           300       -08     +10           23        4      -12  +20   -07  +12   -0*  +10  -25  +15
""CO         11     2           51           300       -08     +10           23        4      -12  +20   -07  +12   -0*  +10  -25  +15

27002         1     •            *            52       -15     +17            i        0      -25  +20   -13 ^+08   -11  +02
2700!         10            4            40       -04     +05            7        0      -15  +1»   -0»  +12   -05  +08
27004         28            4            27«      -00     +13            4        0      -1»  +12   -13  +10   -05  +07
"«"          48           12           128       -11     +13           It        0      -18  +17   -11  +10   -08  +08

*"01         *     2           2«           325       -04     +84           24        0      -Of  +12   -04  +05   -04  +05
"""          t     2           24           325       -04     +04           24        0      -Of  +12   -04  +05   -04  +05

•RG08        21     4           8*           733       -07     +8»           43        6      -13  +14   -08  +10   -04  +08  -25  +15
              >     •            •            38»      -03     +04            4        4      -03  +04  -0?  +11   -04   +08  -09  +11
»»M         72           35           184       -12     -81            8»       8      -12  +11  -04  +04   -07   +04
03JOO         12           12            42       -04     +05            3        0      +00  +02  -04  +03   -05   +04
***Z         "     «           33           284       -12     +04           17        4      -08  +0f  -04  +04   -04   +04  -Of  +11

05001        30     3          10!           592»      -04     +12           33        8      -0»  +14  -08  +0»   -08   +07
OS004        11     4           44           417       -04     +04           31        0      -04  +04  -03  +02   -02   +02
•50«         52           28           172       -02     +08            8        8      -05  +08  -02  +07   -03   +05
03061        18     3           11           343       -03     +11           24        8      -07  +12  -06  +07   -07   +02
M*CA         64    12          284         1.744       -05     +10           f6        0      -08  +10  -06  +07   -06   +05
mzo         02            t             t       TTT     TTT
"HI          02            T             t       TTT     m
2*100         20            t             T       m     ttt
2*200         11            T             t       TTT     TTT
2«00         01            6            35       -13     +07
?      TTT  TTT  TTT  TTT   TTT   TTT
T      TTT  TTT  TTT  TTT   TTT   TTT

T      TTT  TTT  TTT  TTT   TTT   TTT
T      TTT  TTT  TTT  TTT   TTT   TTT
6      +00  +02  +03  +12   -03   +08  -02  +04
I"IHW          52            4            35«      -13     *i7            4M       4      +00  +02  +03  +12  -OS  +08  -02  +04

KRGOt        78    20          347         2.045       -08     +10          117       10      -08  +10  -04  +08  -04  +05  -05  +07

02020         «     •            4            43M      -03     +01           12        0      -05  +04  -02  +03  -03  +04
"*R          *     •            4            43H      -03     +01           12        0      -05  +04  -02  +03  -03  +04

13011         20            8            75       -30     +lf            8        0      -08  +01  -08  +01  -07  +03
«*ID          20            8            75       -30     +1*            8        0      -08  +01  -08  +01  -07  +03

"001         42           31           388       -04     +07           4t        0      -14  +15  -09  +07  -08  +05
""OR          42           31           388       -04     +87           49        8      -14  +15  -09  +07  -08  +05

49001        14     2           40           70S       -08     +01           32        0      -10  +08  -07  +05  -08  +03
"*"*         1*     2           40           70S       -08     +81           32        0      -10  +08  -07  +05  -08  +03

KRG10        28     4          105         1.211       -11     +07          101        0      -13  +11  -08  +04  -08  +05

NATION      317    115        1.705        14.445       -09     +89        1.159       14      -14  +13  -08  +08  -08  +07  -19  +14
                                                               D-6
-------
                   TABLE D-2.   CONTINUOUS  S02  PRECISION AND ACCURACY  ANNUAL
                                  VALUES  FOR  REPORTING ORGANIZATIONS
                                               AUTOMATED ANALYZERS
REP.ORG./ NO.   SITES
STATE/    	
REGION    SLAMS  NANS
07001       16    2
XXCT        16    2
20001
XXME

2Z001
XXMA

30001
XXNH

41001
XXRI

47001
XXVT

XRG01
XRG02

08001
XXDE

09001
XXDC

21001
21003
21005
XXMD

39001
39002
39103
MXPA

48001
           29
     11
     11
                21
31001
XXNJ
33001
XXNY
40001
XXPR
55001
XXVI
11
11
13
13
3
3
3
3
8
8
17
17
0
0
0
0
30

 1
 1
25

 1
 1

 2
 2

 5
 0
 0
 5

12
 5
 5
22

HO.
ANALYZERS
72
72
8
8
68
68
27
27
19
19
12
12
206
76
76
120
120
18
18
t
214
32
32
8
8
24
5
4
33
125
34
27
186
NO.
PRECISION
CHECKS
565
565
106
106
538
538
752
752
401
401
103
103
2.465
535
505
749
749
123
123
T
1.377
305
305
55
55
293
36
45
374
811
587
151
1.549
PROBABILITY
LIMITS
LOU
-11
-11
-09
-09
-12
-12
-11
-11
-07
-07
-10
-10
-11
-13
-13
-06
-06
-12
-12
TTT
-10
-07
-07
-13
-13
-09
-07
-07
-09
-10
-08
-12
-10
UP
+07
+07
+05
+05
+07
+07
+07
+07
+07
+07
+06
+06
+07
+13
+13
+08
+08
+04
+04
m
+10
+09
+09
+02
+02
+07
+05
+03
+06
+11
+07
+10
+09
ImnTTC
. AUUJ. 1 9
T LEVEL
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
" 	 AttUKAtT 	 	 	 ~ 	 ~ 	
LEVEL
LOU
-07
-07
-04
-04
-12
-12
-11
-11
-20
-20
-12
-12
-13
-13
-13
-11
-11
-14
-14
1
UP
+04
+04
+ 07
+07
+ 10
+10
+07
+07
+ 19
+19
+06
+06
+10
+12
+12
+14
+14
+05
+ 05
rnvoAOALAil LAniia 	
LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL
LOU
-05
-05
-06
-06
-13
-13
-10
-10
-13
-13
-09
-09
-10
-10
-10
-10
-10
-09
-09
UP
+04
+04
+ 05
+05
+ 10
+10
+08
+ 08
+13
+13
+06
+ 06
+09
+ 10
+10
+12
+12
+04
+04
LOU
-06
-06
-05
-05
-12
-12
-09
-09
-13
-13
-08
-08
-10


-10
-10
-09
-09
UP LOU
+02
+ 02
+03
+03
+11
+11
+ 10
+ 10
+12
+ 12
+06
+06
+09


+12
+12
+03
+03
                                                 NO.
                                               AUDITS      4      LOU   UP  LOU  UP  LOU   UP  LOU  UF
                                                  19
                                                  19

                                                   9
                                                   9

                                                  26
                                                  26

                                                  27
                                                  27
                                                       23
                                                       23
                                                       11
                                                       11
                                                                 115
                                                                  47
                                                                  47
                                                                 173
                                                                 173
                                                                  15
                                                                  15
»
T
235
8
8
4
4
22
8
7
37
31
34
8
73
' ???
' ???
1 -12
+02
+ 02
-09
-09
-14
-11
-07
-12
-11
-12
-18
-13
??»
?»?
+13
+08
+08
+02
+02
+06
+11
+01
+07
+13
+ 06
+03
+10
???
»?•
-10
-03
-flS
-11
-11
-12
-09
-04
-10
-11
-10
-09
-11
??»
???
+11
+08
+ 08
+ 06
+06
+07
+07
+02
+06
+ 13
+ 06
+01
+ 10
???
??T
-11
-03
-83
-13
-13
-12
-10
-04
-10
-11
-10
-05
-10
???
»?»
+11
+05
+05
+09
+09
+07
+05
+ 02
+06
+ 12
+ 07
+03
+09
                           36
                                      268
                                               -09
                                                      +04
                                                                  10
                                                                                -11  +07  -08  +05  -10  +03
                                                                                    I continued)
                                                      D-7
-------
       TABLE  D-2  (Continued)
               AUTOMATED ANALYZERS
REP.ORG./
STATE/
REGION
48003
XXVA
50001
50002
MXUV
HO.
SLAMS
0
1
1
4
5
SITES
HAMS
8
7
3
2
5
KRG83

01012
01013
01015
81016
XXAL

10001
10002
10003
10004
10005
10007
10011
10012
10013
10015
10016
10018
10020
MXFL

11010
XXGA

18001
18002
*XKY

25100
XXMS

34001
34002
34003
XKNC

42001
HXSC

44001
44002
44003
XXTN

HRG04

14001
14003
17

 1
 0
 1
 0
 2
 2
 1
 2

 1
 3
 3
 1
 a
 i
 i
 i
18

18
18

 8
 0
 8

 2
 2

 4
 1
 0
 5

 4
 4

 2
 1
 8
 3

52

10
 6
      42

       8
       1
       8
       8
 8
 6
 8
 8
 8
 8
 1
 2
 2
 6
 8
 8
 8
 5

 1
 1

 8
 4
 4

 1
 1

 6
 6
 1
 1

 1
 1

 8
 8
 1
 1

15

18
 3
   HO.
AHALYZERS

     16
     52

     24
     24
     48

    359

      3
      6
      4
     36
     49

      4
     18
      5
      4
      4
      7
     16
     28
     16
      8
      4
      1
      3
    116

     36
     36

     32
     16
     48

     12
     12

     31
      8
      8
     39

     17
     17

      7
      4
      4
     15

    326

     84
     36
—PRECISION-
    NO.
 PRECISION
  CHECKS

      77
     345

     142
     275
     417

   s.o*«
   31
   24
2,957
3.829

   35H
  121
   61

   21
   25
  375
  179
  208
   81
   47
    4X
   23
1.196

  373
  373

  193
   93
  286

  131
  131

  245
   49
    OH
  294

   76H
   76*

  115
   27
   24
  166

5.551

  852
  266
                                         PROBABILITY
                                           LIMITS
                                         LOU      UP
                                                                                NO.
                                                                          NO.    AT LEVEL
                                                                        AUDITS      4
                                         -27
                                         -15
                                                             +14
                                                             +05
                                         -10     +18
                                         -08     +11
                                         -09     +11
              -11
                      +09
              -08     +08
              -15     +11
              -13     +11
              -06     +09
              -87     +89
              -15
              -18
              -13
              -18
              -28
              -22
              -15
              -13
              -09
              -12
              -12
              -25
              -12
              -15

              -16
              -16

              -16
              -15
              -64

              -14
              -14

              -07
              -20

              -18

              -14
              -14
                                                 +13
                                                 +11
                                                 +07
                                                 +05
                                                 +12
                                                 +10
                                                 +01
                                                 +07
                                                 +05
                                                 +09
                                                 +06
                                                 +09
                                                 +07
                                                 +06

                                                 +06
                                                 +06

                                                 +03
                                                 +10
                                                 +03

                                                 +08
                                                 +08

                                                 +04
                                                 +11

                                                 +06

                                                 +11
              -05     +08
              -08     +05
              -07     +05
              -01     +01
              -06
              -11
              -09
                      +05
                                                +11
                                                +12
 14
 24

 20
 22
 42

188

  8
  2
  5
  9
 24

  6
  6
  6
  6
  6
  7
 20
  8
 18
  6
  6
  OK
  4
 99

  9X
 30
 32
 62

 11
 11

 15
  8
  OH
 23

 83
 83

  6
  8
  8
 22

333

 21
 13
 8
 8
 8
 7
 7

 8
 6
 0
 8
 8
 8
 6
 2
 8
 8
 8
 6
 8
 2

 I
 1

 8
 0
 0

 6
 6

 2
 6
 6
 2

 6
 0

 3
 0
 8
 3

15

 2
 0
	ACCURACY	
 	PROBABILITY LIMITS	
 LEVEL  1  LEVEL  2  LEVEL  3  LEVEL  4
 LOU   UP  LOU   UP  LOU   UP  LOU   UP

 -11  +10  -11  +12  -09  +13
 -11  +08  -10  +09  -11  +10

 -12  +08  -07  +08  -08  +07  -07  +05
 -12  +11  -05  +07  -06  +06
 -12  +10  -06  +08  -07  +06  -87  +05

 -12  +09  -10  +09  -10  +08  -07  +05

 -08  +06  +01  +03  +01  +07
 -26  +05  -23  +07  -22  +05
 -IS  +14  -14  +18  -09  -02
 -10  +07  -15  +12  -14  +10  -08  +05
 -12  +09  -12  +12  -12  +11  -88  +05

 -34  +27  -17  +12  -12  +13
 -27  +17  -08  +11  +00  +05
 -23  +05  -17  +11  -16  +11
 -16  +27  -05  +22  +01  +18
 -37  +61  -04  +22  -07  +21
 -22  +17  -12  +16  -12  +11
 -21  +15  -12  +10  -II  +12
 -09  +07  -06  +07  -87  +10  -92  +04
 -16  +05  -15  +08  -15  +09
 -14  +18  -06  +12  -39  +25
 -18  +10  -09  +15  -05  +11

 -10  +05  -04  +11  -02  +11
 -22  +17  -13  +13  -13  +14  -82  +04

 -16  +15  -15  +08  -09  +10
 -16  +15  -15  +08  -09  +10

 -11  +12  -12  +07  -14  +87
 -28  +14  -0*  +06  -13  +06
 -14  +12  -09  +07  -11  +07

 -29  +07  -19  +00  -15  -02
 -29  +07  -19  +00  -15  -02
 -14  +09  -16  +10   -16   +12  -11
 -21  +05  -15  +06   -14   +05
                                   +14
 -17  +09  -16  +08  -15  +18  -11  +14

 -20  +11  -11  +10  -11  +10
 -20  +11  -11  +10  -11  +10

 -11  +12  -10  +12  -09  +10  -14  +11
 -05  +04  -04  +03  -03  +01
 -08  +09  -05  +05  -OS  +11
 -04  +04  -02  +06  -01  +09  +00  +07

 -17  +12  -10  +10  -11  +10  -02  +08

 -17  +14  -14  +12  -13  +12  -15  +16
 -17  +14  -10  +10  -10  +11
                                                          (continued)
                       D-8
-------
                                            TABLE  D-2  (Continued)
                                                     AUTOMATED ANALYZERS
REP.ORG.S  NO.   SITES
STATE/    «.•—-.«,«»«—
REGION    SLAMS   NANS
MIL
                  13
15001
15002
15005
15008
15010
15100
MNIH
23001
23002
KHMI
24001
HKNN
36001
36002
36003
36004
36006
36007
36008
36009
36010
36012
36013
36014
36015
36016
XKOH
51001
KKUI






10
2
4
4
3
3
0
2
2
3
t
(
4
8
1
2
3
4
0
0
21
3
3
3
0
0
1
1
2
4
7
4
11
7
7
2













23
12
12
NRG05
            59
                  72
04001
NXAR
19001
• KLA
3ZOG1
32002
m>Nn
37101
37102
37103
MKOK
45901
45002
45003
45006
1
1
5
5
9
0
9
4
1
1
4
4
1
1
1
   NO.
ANALYZERS

    120

     37
     4
     4
     9
     6
     21
     81

     37
     26
     63

     35
     35

     8
     18
     6
     12
     12
     8
     28
     20
     8
     8
     8
     12
     12
     6
    166

     60
     40

    525

     8
     8

     24
     24

     33
     3
     36

     12
     4
     8
     24

     66
     4
     4
     17
—PRECISION-
    NO.
 PRECISION
  CHECKS

   1,118

     178
     23
     21
     54
     27
     106
     409

     241
     111*
     352

     508
     508

     39
     92
     44
     82
     80
     55
     168
     117
     46
     53
     37H
     56*
     153
     40
   1.062

     393
     393

   3.842

     48
     48

     158
     158

     180
      5*
     185

     45«
     21
     48
     134

   2.413
     31
      8»
     103
PROBABILITY
  LIMITS
LOU      UP
-11

-11
-17
-03
-04
-08
-12
-11

-13
-14
-15

-10
-10

-01
-10
-11
-13
-12
-09
-08
-18
-16
-08
-18
-09
-14
-07
-13

-09
-09

-12

-23
-23

-13
-13

-15
-12
-16

-14
-26
-09
-15

-06
-10
-22
-13
+11

+10
+05
+13
+08
+06
+07
+10

+08
+19
+12

+09
+09

+18
+09
+10
+11
+08
+09
+08
+12
+03
+07
+18
+07
+11
+08
+11

+06
+06

+10

+16
+16

+07
+07

+13
-04
+13

+08
+18
+08
+11

+05
+10
+10
+06

-HCtUKUtT—- 	 	 	 	 	 	
NO. AT LEVEL LEVEL 1
UDITS 4 LOU
34 2 -17
38 -12
f -IS
5 -05
• -06
* +03
16 -10
80 -12
12 -20
8 -08
20 -17
22 2 -07
22 2 -07










»


5
73
16
16
2*5
8
8
18
18
41
6
47
6
4
8
18
23
4
3
14
-28
-23
-33
-2»
-It
-24
-10
-24
-08
-04
-34
-14
-14
-42
-25
-07
-07
-17
-50
-50
-11
-11
-11
-16
-13
-17
-0»
-14
-15
-26
-15
-1»
-17
UP
+14
+11
+05
+14
+11
+06
+06
+11
+09
+12
+12
+10
+10
+28
+09
+46
+43
+11
+13
+27
+20
+04
+07
+42
+14
+03
+58
+25
+11
+11
+17
+35
+35
+16
+16
+13
-03
+13
+09
+17
+06
+09
+16
+17
-05
-05
~rt\VBflBAI._ 1 1 L.DJ, I 9
LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3
LOU
-13
-Ot
-13
-06
-05
-04
-07
-0*
-17
-08
-15
-06
-06
-26
-27
-30
-30
-10
-13
-06
-13
-12
-04
-43
-15
-08
-47
-24
-03
-03
-16
-44
-44
-01
-09
-07
-17
-10
-1»
-08
-07
-12
-15
-03
-12
-16
UP
til
+10
+0*
+17
+11
+09
+07
+10
+09
+10
+11
+09
+09
+25
+ 14
+38
+45
+16
+10
+15
+16
+07
+12
+46
+17
+04
+80
+28
+06
+06
+17
+35
+35
+13
+13
+10
+ 02
+10
+12
+01
+07
+09
+07
+ 08
+04
-05
LOU
-12
-07
-13
-05
-03
-05
-09
-09
-18
-07
-15
-07
-07
-31
-34
-31
-29
-09
-12
-11
-16
-13
-05
-42
-14
-07
-43
-25
-05
-05
-16
-44
-44
-08
-08
-08
-20
-11
-17
-14
-05
-11
-13
-03
+03
-14
UP
+11
+09
+05
+18
+08
+07
+06
+ 10
+10
+09
+11
+08
+08
+30
+18
+36
+40
+17
+07
+14
+20
+08
+15
+45
+17
+02
+77
+29
+05
+ 05
+17
+37
+37
+13
+13
+09
+01
+10
+10
+07
+04
+07
+08
+11
+04
-02
LEVEL 4
LOU UP
-15 +16










+02 +04
+02 +04















-08 +02
-08 +02
-08 +10











-19 +12

+01 +04

                                                                                              (continued)
                                                            D-9
-------
TABLE D-2 (Continued)
     AUTOMATED ANALYZERS
REP.ORG.
STATE/
REGION
HNTX
MRG06
16002
16003
KMIO
17001
««S
26001
26002
26003
26004
26005
•MHO
28003
MMNB
MRG07
06001
KXCO
27001
KXHT
35001
•UNO
46001
MKUT
«RG08
13100
03200
03300
KHAZ
05001
05004
05036
05061
MMCA
12120
KKHI
54100
x»GU
K»609
13001
/ NO.


SLAMS
7
28
1
2
3
1
1
3
4
1
1
2
11
1
•
14
|
I
2
2
4
4
4
4
11
6
I
1
7
22
7
1
14
49
I
1
1
1
57
3
SITES


HANS
4
8
1
2
3
2
2








11
2
2
1
1
1
1
2
2
5
I
1
1
2
2
2
1
4
8
1
1
I
1
11
1

NO.
ANALYZERS
91
183
4
25
29
8
8
24
22
12
12
8
78
1
1
114
7
7
12
12
16
16
24
24
59
29
4
3
36
76
36
24
75
211
t
t
,
t
247
8
NO.
PRECISION
CHECKS
2.755
3.281
23*
118
131
45
45
139
128
87
72
54
481
2*
2*
158
33*
3511
169
169
111
111
319
319
413
181
0*
15K
195
466
223
133
452
1.274
T
t
T
t
1.449
89
PBflRARTI TTV
rKUDnDm I I
LIMITS
LOU
-17
-19
-19
-11
-11
-18
-18
-25
-11
-14
-17
-11
-18
-22
-22
-17
-24
-24
-17
-17
-18
-18
-18
-18
-12
-11

-18
-11
-11
-17
-19
-13
-13
Tt!
ttt
ttt
m
-13
-11
UP
+15
+07
+04
+12
+11
+07
+07
+14
+13
+18
+08
+05
+14
-09
-09
+14
+21
+21
+19
+09
+16
+16
+16
+06
+09
+02

+04
+02
+11
+04
+13
+10
+11
ttt
tit
ttt
m
+11
+17

-ACCURACY
NO. AUDITS —•»—••— 	 rKUDABALA 1 I LlltJ. 1 a~
NO. AT LEVEL LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3
AUDITS
44
135
12
11
22
5
5
8
8
6
6
6
34
0«
I*
61
7
7
12
12
6
6
25
25
51
11
0*
5
15
26
17
9
21
72
t
t
t
t
87
6
4
8
8
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
1
12
12
1
I
IS
13
25











t
t
V 1
8
LOU
-25
-21
-19
-08
-11
-26
-26
-22
-22
-08
-09
-21
-19


-17
-31
-31
-32
-32
+12
+12
-11
-11
-21
-21

-15
-19
-21
-06
-15
-14
-14
ttt
ttt
ttt
ttt
-17

UP
+11
+16
+02
+10
+17
+16
+16
+23
+14
+23
+15
+11
+17


+14
+13
+13
+19
+19
+11
+11
+11
+14
+14
+02

+02
+05
+15
+14
+24
+17
+17
ttt
ttt
m
ttt
»lt

LOU
-17
-17
-06
-07
-17
-17
-17
-17
-11
-14
-17
-14
-14


-12
-23
-23
-22
-22
-12
-12
-19
-19
-15
-14

-15
-15
-15
-05
-04
-14
-13
Tt?
???
ttt
???
-13
-12
UP
+06
+13
+05
+19
+14
+12
+12
+14
+11
+21
+13
+07
+14


+11
+13
+13
+11
+11
+11
+11
+07
+07
+11
+04

+07
+07
+09
+12
+17
+11
+13
tt?
???
tt?
ttt
+12
+11
LOU
-15
-16
-17
-10
-19
-12
-12
-22
-14
-18
-18
-14
-17


-14
-21
-21
-21
-21
-17
-17
-19
-09
-14
-17

-07
-07
-17
-05
-04
-17
-15
tt?
t?t
ttt
ttt
-14
-12
UP
+08
+13
+11
+07
+11
+11
+11
+19
+11
+19
+19
+13
+19


+11
+14
+06
+08
+08
+08
+18
+16
+16
+18
+13

+06
+04
+10
+11
+16
+07
+13
ttt
ttt
ttt
ttt
+12
+09
LEVEL 4
LOU
-18
-18
















-21
-21


-08
-18
-14
-19


-09

-02


-12




-17
-01
UP
+13
+13
















+16
+16


+17
+67
+19
+19


+19

+13


+13




+08
+11
                                      (continued)
            D-10
-------
                                              TABLE  D-2  (Continued)
                                                     AUTOMATED ANALYZERS
                          	PRECISION	        	ACCURACY	
REP.ORG./  NO.   SITES                     NO.        PROBABILITY                NO.  AUDITS  	PROBABILITY LIMITS	
STATE/    	        NO.        PRECISION       LIMITS             NO.    AT  LEVEL   LEVEL  1  LEVEL  2  LEVEL  3  LEVEL  4
REGION    SLAMS   NAMS     ANALYZERS      CHECKS       LOU     UP        AUDITS      *       LOU   UP  LOU   UP  LOU  UP  LOU   UP
KMID
             3     ,           «            S9       -10     +07            6       8                -12  +10   -12  +0t  -01  +11

             12           5            21*      -22     +13            7       0      -12  +05  -10  +08   -11  +06
             I     2           3            21«      -22     +13            7       0      -12  +05  -10  +08   -11  +06

4,001        83           38           453       -07     +08           it       4      -10  +0t  -10  +10   -11  +10  -14  +11
             s     j           J8           433       -07     +08           It       4      -10  +0t  -1C  +10   -11  +10  -14  +11
MR610        12     3           31          363       -Ot     +08           32       12      -11  +08  -10  +10  -11  +0»   -12  +12

NATION      308   21*        2,284       22.863       -Ot     +07        1.481       84      -16  +14  -12  +12  -IS  +12   -08  +10
                                                              D-ll
-------
                    TABLE D-3.    CONTINUOUS  N02  PRECISION AND  ACCURACY ANNUAL
                                     VALUES FOR  REPORTING  ORGANIZATIONS
                                                   AUTOMATED ANALYZERS
REP.ORG./  NO.   SITES
STATE/    	
REGION    SLAMS   NAMS
07001         3     0
XXCT         3     0
   NO.
ANALYZERS
     11
     11
--PRECISION-
    NO.
 PRECISION
  CHECKS
      42*
      42*
PROBABILITY
  LIMITS
LOU     UP
-11    +12
-11    +12
                  NO.  AUDITS  	PROBABILITY LIMITS	
            NO.    AT  LEVEL   LEVEL  1  LEVEL  2  LEVEL  3   LEVEL  4
          AUDITS      4      LOU   UP  LOU   UP  LOU   UP   LOU   UP
              5        4      -15  +12  -08  +03  -08  +02   -08  +01
              5        *      -15  +12  -OS  +03  -08  +02   -08  +01
22001
                              24
                              24
                 198
                 198
              -14
              -14
       +12
       +12
                             -24  -02  -20  +03  -22  +07
                             -26  -02  -20  +03  -22  +07
30001
XXHH
                          m
                          TI?
                                                   ?»?   ?»»  ?!»  ?»»  ???  *!»
                                                   !?t   ???  t?T  It!  ???  ???
41001
                                           44
                                           44
                          -02
                          -02
                      +16
                      +16
                                     -05  +20  -03  +12  -03  +11
                                     -05  +20  -03  +12  -03  +11
47001
XXVT
                   5*
                   5X
              -13
              -13
        +03
        +03
XR601
                              41
                                          289
                                                   -13
                                                           +14
                                                                        21
                                                                                        -25  +20  -16  +12  -16  +12  -88  +81
31001
XXNJ
     32
     32
     209
     209
-14
-14
+13
+13
IS
13
-09  +15  -12  +08  -12  +03
-09  +15  -12  +08  -12  +03
33001
XXNY
     20
     20
      97
      97
-10
-10
+11
+11
59
59
-12  +14  -89  +88  -88  +07
-12  +14  -09  +08  -08  +07
XRG02
                              52
                                          306
                                                   -13
                                                           +13
                                                                        72
                                                                                        -11  +14  -09  +08  -09  +07
88801
XKDE

09801
XXDC

21001
21005
XXMD

39001
39002
39003
48001
48002
48003
XXVA
50082
xxuv
      8
      8

      8
      8

      8
      5
     13

     76
      8
     12
     96

     20

     15
     35
      8
     20
      55
      55

      47
      47

      77
      49
     126

     497
      89
      68
     654

     142

      87
     229

      88
      £4
     164
-13
-13
-12
-12
-89
-88
-89
-10
-09
-09
-10
-10
»?*
-21
-15
-10
-08
-IB
+11
+11
+09
+09
+10
+08
+09
+11
+ 09
+89
+11
+09
}»»
+16
+12
+18
+26
+ 17
                      8       0      -10  +06  -04  +83  -02  +02
                      8       0      -10  +86  -04  +03  -02  +02

                      4       0      -08  +11  -12  +23  -07  +11
                      4       8      -88  +11  -12  +23  -87  +11

                      8       6      -83  +14  -84  +18  -84  +89
                      6       t      -13  +12  -83  +84  -83  +03
                     14       t      -89  +14  -84  +88  -84  +07

                     20       0      -IS  +18  -11  +12  -18  +11
                      7       0      -11  +12  -18  +87  -85  +07
                      4       0      -08  +09  -03  +83  -04  +02
                     31       0      -12  +15  -18  +09  -88  +89

                      8       0      -07  +23  -05  +08  -84  +05
                      »       I      ?»t  ???  ??J  ???  fit  TJT
                     15       0      -03  +04  -01  +02  -03  +02
                     23       0      -08  +15  -04  +05  -03  +83

                      8       8      -07  +21  -84  +14  -83  +11
                      6       8      -84  +26  -05  +17  -89  +15
                     14       0      -86  +23  -04  +15  -05  +13
XRG03
            15
                             180
                                        1.275
                                                    -11
                                                           +12
                                                                        94
                                                                                        -10  +16  -08  +11  -86  +08
                                                                                               (continued)
                                                             D-12
-------
                                   TABLE  D-3  (Continued)
                                          AUTOMATED ANALYZERS
REP.ORG./  NO.   SITES
 REGION

 10001
 10003
 10011
 10012
 10013
 10016
 10018
 10020
 KXFL

 11010
 HHGA

 18001
 18002
 HKKY

 34002
 34003
 KKNC

 44002
 MMTN

 DRG04

 14001
 14003
 HHIL

 15001
 15008
 KKIN

 23002
 **MI

 24001
 H*MN

 36001
 36007
 36008
 36009
 36014
 36016
 HXOH

51001
HXUI

MRG05

04001
M*AR

19001
          SLAMS   NAMS
 0
 8

 6
 1
 7

 I
 1
 1

 1
 1

14

 3
 4
 9

 2
 1
 3

 I
 g

 o
 0

 1
 1
 0
 0
 1
 1
 4

 0
 0
15
 1
 1
 2

 8
 I
 0

 2
 2

 2
 2

 0
 g
 2
 2
 0
 g
 4

 2
 2

12

 0
 0
   NO.
ANALYZERS

      4
      1
      7
      8
      2
      4
      2
      3
     31

      6
      6

     21
      4
     25

      8
      4
     12

      4
      4

     78

     16
     27
     43

     5
     4
     9
                    8
                    8

                    4
                    4
                    8
                    8
                    4
                    0
                   28

                    8
                    8

                   «6

                    4
                    4

                   It
—PRECISION-
    NO.
 PRECISION
  CHECKS

      28
      12
      54
      51
      21
      47

      21
     237

      71
      71

     109
       OH
     109K

      45
      21
      66

      27
      27

     510

      91
     148
     239

      22*
      26
      48M

      OH
      OH

     113
     113

      30
      28
      48
      33H
      23
      OH
     162

      51
      51

     613

      32
      32

     105H
PROBABILITY
  LIMITS
LOU      UP

-16     +13
-18     +11
-16     +28
-09     +12
-14     +14
-18     +23
-18     +18
-29     +26
-17     +21
                                                            	ACCURACY	
                                                                    NO. AUDITS  	PROBABILITY LIMITS	
                                                              NO.    AT LEVEL   LEVEL  1  LEVEL  2  LEVEL  3  LEVEL  4
                                                            AUDITS      4       LOU   UP  LOU   UP  LOU   UP  LOU   UP
                                          -11
                                          -11

                                          -12

                                          -06

                                          -15
                                          -10
                                          -14

                                          -85
                                          -04

                                          -12

                                          -86
                                          -07
                                          -07
        +13
        +13

        +13

        +18

        +27
        +22
        +25

        +85
        +00

        +14

        +11
        +09
        +10
                                         -11     +20
                                         -12     +07
                                         -13     +15
                                                     -14
                                                     -14

                                                     -08
                                                     -12
                                                     -11
                                                     -24
                                                     -17

                                                     -17

                                                     -09
                                                     -09

                                                     -13

                                                     -03
                                                     -03

                                                     -10
                                   +10
                                   +10

                                   +30
                                   +15
                                   +10
                                   +24
                                   +16

                                   +21

                                   +06
                                   +06

                                   +14

                                   +02
                                   +02

                                   +08
  6
  1
  6
  4
  3
  4
  OH
  3
 21

  4
  4

 18
  0«
 18

  8
  4
 12

  8
  8

 71

  7
 10
 17

  8
  4
 12

  1*
  1*

  4
  4

  5
  4
  4
  6
  5
  0*
26

  4
 4

64

 6
 6

15*
                                                                                            -51  +55   -11   +36  -20  +47

                                                                                            -37  +35   -16   +09  -12  +10
                                                                                            -06  +09   -02   +10  -01  +09
                                                                                            -32  -13   -23   +15  -20  +27
                                                                                            +00  +00   +00   +06  -03  +07

                                                                                            -33  -01   -27   -11  -26  -17
                                                                                            -36  +29   -22   +23  -23  +27

                                                                                            -05  -01   -12   +08  -19  +12
                                                                                            -05  -01   -12   +08  -19  +12

                                                                                            -15  +30   -10   +22  -16  +17

                                                                                            -15  +30   -10   +22  -16  +17

                                                                                            -16  +22   -08   +13  -11  +12
                                                                                            -35  +18   -21   +11  -11  +07
                                                                                            -24  +22   -14   +14  -11  +10

                                                                                            -12  +12   -03   +06  -05  +05
                                                                                            -11  +11   -03   +05  -05  +05

                                                                                            -24  +26   -15   +18  -17  +18

                                                                                            -08  +25   -01   +11  -03  +08
                                                                                            -13  +08   -11   +13  -13  +13
                                                                                            -15  +18   -08   +13  -10  +12

                                                                                            -18  +26   -08   +12  -07.  +08
                                                                                            -07  +17   -05   +06  -03  +03
                                                                                            -14  +23   -07   +10  -04  +07
                                      -41   +40   -14  +11  +00  +00
                                      -41   +40   -14  +11  +00  +00

                                      -21   +28   -10  +14  -06  +13
                                      -15   +36   -11  +12  -05  +02
                                      -01   +27   -17  +36  -14  +16
                                      -38   +91   -18  +23  -09  -05
                                      -52   +46   -14  +18  -11  +04

                                      -32   +51   -14  +21  -13  +09

                                      -12   +13   -06  +03  -06  +01
                                      -12   +13   -06  +03  -06  +01

                                      -26   +35   -11  +15  -10  +09

                                      -20   +00   -19  -02  -17  -04  -17  -05
                                      -20   +80   -19  -02  -17  -04  -17  -OS

                                      -08   +15   -08  +12  -09  +11
                                                                                      (continued)
                                                D-13
-------
                                               TABLE  D-3  (Continued)
                                                      AUTOMATED ANALYZERS
REP.ORG./  NO.   SITES
STATE/    	
REGION    SLAMS   HAMS
 HULA
             15
                NO.
             ANALYZERS

                  It
                  	PRECISION-
                       NO.
                    PRECISION
                     CHECKS

                         105K
                       PROBABILITY
                         LIMITS
                       LOU      UP
                                                                        	ACCURACY	
                                                                                NO.  AUDITS  	PROBABILITY LIMITS	
                                                                          NO.     AT  LEVEL   LEVEL  I  LEVEL  2  LEVEL  3  LEVEL  4
                                                                        AUDITS       4       LOU   UP  LOU   UP  LOU   UP  LOU   UP
                                                      -10
                                                              +08
                                                                            13*
                                                                                            -08  +15  -08  +12  -0»  +11
 32001
 32002
 NXHN
                                 5*
                                 5X
                                10*
                                  -12
                                  -12
                                  -14
                               +10
                               -01
                               +06
                                                                            3        0      +13  +15  -1*   +06  -07  -0*
                                                                            3        0      -06  -02  -08   +01  -06  +04
                                                                            6        0      -15  +25  -10   +03  -09  +03
37101
37102
37103
XXOK

45001
45002
45006
XXTX

XRG06

17001
XXKS

26001
26002
26003
26004
26005
XXMO

XRG07

06001
KXCO
              2
              0
              3
              5

              2
              1
              2
              5

             28

              1
              1
                   8
                   2
                  12
                  22

                  50
                   8
                  13
                  71

                 118

                   t
                   t
            20
            10
            11

            54

            54


            14
   43
    9
   72
  124

2,111
  .65
   72
2,248

2.519

    t
    t

   43
  122
   43
   69
   25
  302

  302

   SON
-07
-02
-12
-10

-08
-10
-03
-08

-09

m
w

-47
-10
-33
-16
-18
-25

-25

-35
-35
+05
+02
+07
+06

+07
+15
+ 05
+07

+07

W
m

+47
+11
+39
+15
+16
+25

+25

+28
+28
                                                         8
                                                         2
                                                         *
                                                        1*

                                                        16
                                                         7
                                                        10
                                                        33

                                                        71
                                                                            33

                                                                            33
                                                             -24  +12  -17  +05  -15  +04
                                                             -07  +04  -04  +01  -01  +02
                                                             -13  +02  -07  +07  -04  +08
                                                             -18  +07  -13  +08  -12  +09

                                                             -34  +27  -19  +17  -17  +13
                                                             -23  +25  -16  +13  -18  +07
                                                             -06  +12  -05  +04  -04  +03
                                                             -25  +24  -15  +13  -14  +10

                                                             -21  +19  -14  +11  -13  +10  -17  -05

                                                             »T  TIT  ??f  ??!  t?»  T?»
                                                             T?t  t?T  T?T  ???  tt»  ???
                                                                                            -31  +66
                                                                                            -16  +13
                                                                                            -26  +03
                                                                                            -09  +14
                                                                                            -22  +25
                                                                                            -28  +28
                                                                                         -18  +31   -16   +18
                                                                                         -08  +07   -07   +06
                                                                                         -13  +11   -12   +09
                                                                                         -09  +17   -18   +28
                                                                                         -25  +18   -23   +15
                                                                                         -14  +16   -14   +14
                                                                                            -28  +28  -14  +16  -14  +14
                                                                                            -27  +14
                                                                                            -27  +14
                                                                                         -17  +08  -17  +06   -14   +04
                                                                                         -17  +08  -17  +06   -14   +04
 35001
 NXND

 46001
 KKUT

 XRG08
                   8
                   8

                  12
                  12

                  34
                          50
                          50

                         135
                         135

                         235
                       -08
                       -08

                       -08
                       -08

                       -17
                                                              +07
                                                              +07

                                                              +10
                                                              +10

                                                              +14
                                  3
                                  3

                                  10
                                  It

                                  21
                                      +05  +19
                                      +05  +19
                                       -11  +09
                                       -11  +09
                                         -02  +10  -05  +07
                                         -02  +10  -05  +07

                                         -09  +05  -10  +05
                                         -09  +05  -10  +05
                                                                                            -19  +16  -13  +08  -13  +06  -14  +04
 OiZOO
 03300
 KXAZ

 05001
 05004
 05036
 05061
 ft*CA

 29300
 KXHV

 XRG09

 38001
34     0
 8     4
 5     2
15     4
62    10
64

 1
12

 0
  0
  1
  1

102
 48
 28
 83
261

  6
  6

268

  4
                                              OK
                                              8X
                                              8*

                                            558"
                                            307
                                            171
                                            511
                                          1.547

                                             38
                                             38

                                          1.593

                                             22
            -05
            -05

            -13
            -06
            -11
            -17
            -13

            -06
            -06

            -13

            -21
        +09
        +09

        +12
        +08
        +09
        +12
        +12

        +06
        +06

        +11

        +14
               4
               4

              37
              24
               8
              24
              93

               3
               3

             100

               7
-01  +02  -01  +04  +00   +05
-01  +02  -01  +04  +00   +05

-18  +10  -16  +06  -14   +06
-10  +09  -08  +07  -08   +07
-11  +13  -06  +07  -08   +08   -09   +08
-18  +03  -16  +04  -16   +05
-17  +10  -14  +07  -14   +07   -09   +08

+00  +00  -10  -07  -09   -04   -08   -01
+00  +00  -10  -07  -09   -04   -08   -01

-16  +10  -14  +07  -13   +07   -10   +06

-43  +27  -10  +13  -08   +12
                                                                                                   (continued)
                                                             D-14
-------
                                             TABLE  D-3 (Continued)
                                                    AUTOMATED ANALYZERS
                         	PRECISION	        	ACCURACY	
REP.ORG./  NO.   SITES                     NO.        PROBABILITY               NO. AUDITS  	PROBABILITY LIMITS	
STATE/    	       NO.        PRECISION       LIMITS             NO.     AT LEVEL   LEVEL  1  LEVEL  2  LEVEL  3   LEVEL  4
REGION    SLAMS   NAMS    ANALYZERS     CHECKS       LOU     UP        AUDITS     4       LOU   UP  LOU   UP  LOU   UP   LOU   UP

»*OR         10           4            22       -21    +14            7        0      -43  +27  -10  +13  -08  +12

                                                                                         -18  +2t  -12  +13  -08  +0»
                                                                                         -18  +2i  -12  +13  -08  +0*

                                                                                         -2*  +2*  -11  +13  -08  +10

                                                                                         -20  +21  -13  +12  -12  +10   -14  +«
4*001
KXUA
KRG10
NATION
0
0
1
170
2
2
2
58
4
4
8
*28
31*
53«
7,6*5
-15
-15
-18
-12
+10
+10
+12
+12
11
11
18
573
0
1
«
23
                                                          D-15
-------
                       TABLE D-4.   OZONE  PRECISION AND ACCURACY  ANNUAL
                                      VALUES FOR REPORTING ORGANIZATIONS
REP.OR6./  NO.  SITES
STATE/   	
REGION   SLANS  HAMS
070(11       3    6
KXCT        3    £
29001
*XME
22891
30081
x»NH
41001
47001
XXVT
KRG01
31081
»«NJ
33001
40001
*XPR
XRG02
 2
 2

 5
 5

 3
 3

 1
 1

 2
 2

16
     U

     i
     6

     11
     11

     1
     1

     18
08001
KiiDE
09091
x*DC
21 SHI
21003
219C5
*XMD
39001
39002
39083
XXPA
48081
48003
x%VA
4
4
1
1
6
2
3
11
19
£
2
23
6
4
18
1
1
I
1
2
8
1
S
8
2
1
11
5
S
5


NO.
ANALYZERS
27
27
14
"
44
44
14
14
6
6
4
4
169
59
59
76
76
t
T
135
16
16
8
8
43
6
16
65
109
11
10
130
«
16
48

NO.
PRECISION
CHECKS
147*
147*
198
198
331
331
319
319
92
92
34*
34*
1.113
489
489
445
445
t
t
854
149
149
59
59
444
44
187
£75
710
121
55
886
276
91
367
AUTOMATED ANALYZERS
PRflRARTl TTY
r KUDHD J.L III
LIMITS
LOU
-86
-86
-08
-88
-12
-12
-10
-10
-18
-18
-03
-05
-II
-11
-11
-11
-11
?lt
?!»
-11
-07
-07
-06
-86
-86
-OS
-05
-86
-09
-08
-68
-09
-07
-13
-09
UP
+10
+10
+ 06
+86
+18
+18
+86
+06
+ 86
+06
+10
+ 18
+08
+12
+12
+88
+08
fit
3!T
+10
+08
+08
+89
+89
+86
+06
+05
+95
+06
+ 87
+13
+07
+05
+11
+03



NO. AT LEVEL LEVEL I
AUDITS
18
10
IS
15
19
19
14
14
8
8
4
4
70
51
51
128
128
,
*
179
7
7
4
4
45
18
17
72
27
14
4
45
19
11
38
4
8
8
0
8
8
0
0
0
8
0
0
0
0
&
8
0
0
i
•t
8
0
8
0
8
8
8
0
8
8
0
8
8
16
0
16
LOU
-07
-07
-08
-08
-09
-09
-89
-09
-05
-05
+ 61
+81
-08
-07
-87
-13
-13
??f
???
-12
-05
-05
-08
-88
-IB
-85
-14
-11
-05
-18
+03
-67
-14
-63
-11
UP
+06
+ 06
+ 09
+09
+69
+ 09
+ 11
+11
+11
+11
+07
+07
+09
+12
+ 12
+89
+ 09
m
??»
+16
+86
+86
+05
+05
+06
+07
+ 67
+87
+ 68
*07
»3S
+09
+13
+ 06
+11
LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4
LOU
-09
-09
-07
-07
-07
-07
-11
-11
-09
-09
+61
+ 61
-08
-66
-06
-13
-13
??f
???
-11
-08
-08
-67
-87
-07
-06
-08
-07
-86
-08
-83
-66
-08
-04
-07
UP
+ 07
+67
+69
+ 69
+ 10
+10
+89
+09
+ 18
+18
+01
+01
+69
+10
+ 18
+89
+89
???
?»?
+18
+ 88
+88
+65
+85
+ 06
+ 05
+ 07
+06
+07
+ 88
»C7
+67
+07
+ 04
+06
LOU
-10
-10
-06
-06
-09
-09
-12
-12
-08
-08
-01
-01
-09
-89
-09
-12
-12
»??
*!*
-12
-08
-68
-66
-66
-67
-65
-86
-86
-07
-07
-83
-06
-05
-04
-05
UP LOU UP
+11
+11
+68
+ 08
+12
+12
+18
+ 10
+88
+88
+03
+03
+10
+65
+ 05
+18
+ 18
???
?»T
+89
+89
+09
+06
+06
+86
+ 06
+06
+06
+06
+ 09
+84
+
-------
TABLE D-4 (Continued)
       AUTOMATED ANALYZERS
REP.ORG./ NO.
REGION SLAM!
50001 '
50002 !
«XHV 1
XRG03 5!
01011
01012
01013
01015
KXAL
10011
10003
10005
10011
10012
10013
10014
10015
10016
10017
10018
10020
MXFL
11011
XXGA
18101 li
18002 1
XXKY 1,
25100 i
x»NS !
34111
34002
34003
34004
KHNC
42001
XMSC
44011
44002
44003
44004 i
44005 1
XXTN <
*RG04 43
14101 r
14003 1
**IL 2.
SITES
> HAMS
^ 9
I 9
I 1
I 21
1 1
2
2
I
4-
,
1
8
2
1
2
I
1
2
2
2
1
13
4
4
! I
I 1
I 1
e i
I 9
9
9
Z
9
2
4
4
1
2
1
! I
1 2
t 6
I 34
r 11
t i
> 12
un
nu •
ANALYZERS
IS
4
19
286
12
12
8
4
36
12
5
3
8
12
12
3
9
8
8
15
3
94
11
11
43
8
51
29
29
42
4
17
3
ft
27
27
15
t
8
t
8
43
357
lit
23
139
-PRECISION-
   NO.
CHECKS

   104
    46
   151

 2.286

    58
    54
    37
    24
   173

    88
    41
    15
    95
    81
    91
    It
    41
    89
    51
   177
    22
   82t

   118
   188

   207*
    39
   246 »

   267
   267

   253
    32
    78
    19
   382

   127
   127

   174
    33H
    48
    26 M
    59
   340

 2.4f9

 1,094
   ISO*
 1.244
             PROBABILITY
               LIMITS
             LOU      UP
-II
-03
-09

-08

-12
-09
-18
-35
-18

-12
-10
-13
-20
-16
-18
-44
-17
-19
-15
-OS
-18
-14

-II
-II

-11
-16
-18

-II
-II

-17
-13
-06
-15
-18
       -07

       -10
       -14
       -05
       -11
       -11
       -11

       -11

       -08
       -09
       -08
                     +11
                     +11
                     +11

                     +17
                     +09
                     +07
                     +32
                     +15

                     +11
                     +09
                     +15
                     -02
                     +08
                     +05
                     +31
                     +04
                     +11
                     +03
                     +04
                     +18
                     +11

                     +08
                     +08

                     +09
                     +19
                     +06

                     +09
                     +09

                     +05
                     +02
                     +05
                     +09
                     +06

                     +09
                     +09

                     +12
                     +14
                     +05
                     +06
                     +13
                     +07

                     +09

                     +09
                     +09
                     +09
                         	ACCURACY	
                                 NO.  AUDITS  	PROBABILITY  LIMITS	
                           NO.    AT  LEVEL   LEVEL  1  LEVEL  2  LEVEL  3  LEVEL  4
                         AUDITS      4      LOU   UP  LOU   UP  LOU   UP  LOU   UP

                            12        8     -07  +12  -09  +14  -11   +11
                             4        0     +00  +14  -03  +14  -05   +12
                            16        I     -05  +14  -07  +14  -09   +12

                           174       16     -10  +1»  -87  +08  -07   +07  -05  +04
15
18
8
5
46
8
t
6
11
f
16
4
t
6
9
t
4
87
5
5
32
4
36
19
19
26
4
18
2
SO
134
134
16
18
14
t
15
61
0
8
2
9
2
9
9
9
7
1
•
t
t
9
9
9
9
7
1
9
9
9
9
9
9
«
8
1
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
-10
-38
-24
-20
-28
-10
-34
-11
-26
-10
-05
-07
-03
-02
-26
-19
-43
-20
-09
-09
-12
-09
-11
-05
-05
-10
-06
-09
-20
-11
-11
-11
-16
-05
-20
-09
-13
-15
+09
+12
+12
+16
+15
+08
+30
+03
+08
+15
+05
+01
+04
+05
+14
+15
-06
+ 11
+11
+11
+11
+15
+11
+04
+04
+11
+04
+08
-04
+09
+12
+12
+07
+02
+17
+06
+07
+10
-06
-19
-09
-22
-16
-09
-19
-10
-19
-07
-03
-13
-07
-03
-24
-10
-31
-16
-05
-05
-11
-08
-10
-04
-04
-07
-07
-07
-16
-08
-08
-08
-12
-04
-16
-07
-07
-10
+07
+04
+06
-01
+08
+05
+06
-01
+04
+09
+04
+07
+06
+01
+12
+09
-17
+11
+12
+12
+09
+11
+09
+02
+02
+06
+09
+06
+00
+07
+11
+11
+04
+02
+11
+04
+05
+06
-06
-15
-03
-28
-16
-10
-21
-10
-13
-07
-02
-06
-41
-02
-2t
-06
-29
-17
-03
-03
-11
-08
-10
-07
-07
-02
-09
-08
-15
-06
-09
-09
-12
-13
-14
-07
-06
-10
+06
-01
+02
+02
+07
+06
+06
+00
+04
+09
+04
+06
+26
+11
+12
+06
-18
+11
+10
+18
+17
+09
+07
+02
+02
+04
+09
+07
+04
+06
+10
+10
+05
+13
+07
+06
+06
+06


-12 +11

-12 +11



-09 +06








-09 +06




















                    438

                     30
                     13
                     43
                                     -It  +13  -12  +10  -12  +19  -08  +0t
-13  +15
-15  +13
-14  +14
-11  +08
-08  +06
-11  +18
-11  +17
-10  +08
-10  +17
                                                  (continued)
             D-17
-------
                                      TABLE D-4 (Continued)
                                            AUTOMATED ANALYZERS
REP.ORG./ NO.
STATE/ 	
REGION SLAM
15001
15002 .
15001
15005
15008
15010
15100
»«IN
23001
21002
»*HI
24001
«*HN
36001
36002
36003
36006
36007
36008
3600*
36010
36012
3601*
36015
36016
**OH 1
51001 1
MHUI 1
XRG05 7
04001
»*AR
1*001
*«LA
32001
32002
HKNH
17101
17132
17101
KXOK
45001
45002
45006
«*TX 1
SITES

> NANS
1
I





1
7
1
•
2
2
2
t
1
2
2
t
1
2
I
1
Z
I
t 13
! 4
J 4
I 46
1 2
1 2
1 t
1 «
1 •
» 2
t 2
I I
0 1
1 2
3 4
1 13
2 1
6 1
6 14

NO.
ANALYZERS
24
t
3
3
11
4
«
5*
3«
It
55
1«
If
12
12
1
8
8
28
10
14
7
4
8
3
117
5»
5*
448
8
8
SO
50
12
It
28
12
4
12
28
86
It
24
126
	 PRECISION--
NO.
PRECISION
^CHECKS
11*
33M
1J«
15«
3*
15
43*
27f
211
80
2»0
264
264
5«
56
17*
50
43
168
77
77
4t
22
51
21
687
330*
310»
1.0*4
52
52
1*7
1*7
77
76*
153
64
24
f*
157
1,466
115
151
3.754
PROBABIL
LIMITS
LOU
-10
-0*
-11
-07
-0*
-07
-12
-18
-«»
-08
-1*
-07
-07
-12
-11
-20
-05
-14
-10
-12
-10
-10
-12
-08
-08
-11
-0*
-0*
-0*
-01
-01
-08
-08
-11
-0*
-10
-«»
-10
-11
-10
-07
-11
-15
-08
I TV

UP
+08
+08
+01
+08
+ 07
+0*
+07
+08
+ 84
+06
+ 05
+ 10
+10
+14
+11
+0*
+ 05
+ 10
+ 10
+ 07
+ 04
+ 07
+17
+04
+06
+0*
+06
+06
+0*
+01
+01
+06
+06
+06
+11
+05
+08
+11
+10
+10
+07
+0*
+06
+07

NO. AT LEVEL LEVEL
AUDITS 4 LOU
28
17
5
7
8
t
11
82
15
5
20
12
12
5
4
4
4
5
*
7
4
7
5
4
t
64
21
21
242
8
8
47
47
12
10
22
t
t
8
20
11
18
24
71
-14
-14
-It
-Ot
-08
-15
-17
-11
-08
-05
-08
-12
-12
-24
-14
-0!
-18
-18
-0*
-17
-15
-12
-07
-02
-It
-15
-10
-10
-11
-05
-05
-14
-14
-07
-11
-11
-as
-02
-Ot
-05
-17
-1*
-15
-17
ACCURACY 	
1
UP
+11
+12
+01
+0*
+01
+12
+07
+10
+05
+12
+07
+08
+08
+0*
+11
+01
+20
+ 06
+1*
+05
+28
+14
+04
+07
+05
+14
+07
+07
+11
+06
+06
+05
+05
+11
+08
+12
+08
+05
+12
+08
+11
+11
+0*
+10
LEVEL 2 LEVEL 1 LEVEL 4
LOU
-08
-12
-08
-05
-0*
-12
-11
-10
-07
+01
-07
-10
-10
-23
-12
-04
-85
-Oi
-11
-08
-11
-88
-01
-03
-0*
-11
-0*
-0*
-10
-Ot
-Ot
-10
-10
-07
-13
-It
-•8
-02
-08
-Ot
-13
-15
-14
-14
UP
+07
+11
+04
+08
+02
+07
+09
+08
+04
+04
+05
+05
+05
+0*
+0*
+04
+11
+02
+1*
+05
+20
+07
+04
+07
+06
+11
+05
+05
+08
+05
+05
+07
+07
+0*
+07
+0*
+07
+01
+10
+07
+12
+12
+08
+11
LOU
-08
-12
-07
-07
-05
-12
-12
-0*
-06
-01
-Ot
-07
-07
-23
-08
-05
-03
-04
-10
-0*
-11
-05
+00
-05
-20
-11
-08
-08
-1*
-08
-08
-08
-08
-07
-14
-10
-07
-02
-0*
-07
;12
-15
-13
-14
UP LOU UP
+05
+10
+03
+0*
+02
+0t
+0*
+07
+04
+0*
+06
+02
+02
+09
+08
+04
+10
+00
+21
+05
+17
+01
+05
+08
+0*
+12
+05
+05
+08
+04
+04
+08
+08
+07
+08
+08
+05
+01
+11
+07
+15
+12
+05
+ 12
HRGOt
          14
               28
                         240
                                  4.511
                                            -08
                                                  +07
                                                             170
                                                                            -14  +10  -11  +0*  -11  +10
                                                                                 (continued)
                                                 D-18
-------
                                                TABLE D-4 (Continued)
                                                      AUTOMATED ANALYZERS
                          	PRECISION	        	ACCURACY	
REP ORC.X  NO.   SITES                      NO.         PROBABILITY                NO. AUDITS  	PROBABILITY LIMITS	
STATE/    	        HO.        PRECISION       LIMITS             NO.    AT LEVEL   LEVEL  1  LEVEL  2  LEVEL  3  LEVEL  *
REGION    SLAMS   NAMS     ANALYZERS      CHECKS       LOU      UP        AUDITS      4       LOU   UP  LOU   UP  LOU   UP  LOU   UP

16001         12           II            »1       -14     +1*            '        •      -1*  **«  -*'  *1Z  -••  *04
16002         20            8            48       -OS     +13           24        I      -OJ  +06  -03  +03  -04  +03
16003         II            4            12«      -21     +14            2        0      -OS  +04  -04  +01
mtlO          43           23           141       -06     +07           33        0      -08  +01  -07  +06  -05  +03

17001         12           12            75       -15     +23            4        0      -52  +44  -01  +08  -11  +14
KXKS          12           12            75       -15     +23            4        0      -52  +44  -09  +08  -11  +14

26001         22           25           147       -12     +12            8        t      -13  +12  -10  +10  -0»  +08
26002         50           15            73»      -10     +04
26003         31           13            68«      -14     +0»
26004         11            8            50       -08     +07
26005         20            8            51       -08     +04
•XHO         13    4           61           381       -12     +01           3

28002         10            T             t       tt?     TTT
28003         12           11            61       -05     +08
»»hB          22           11            61»      -05     +08
I      -11  +27  -01  +18  -11  +11
•      -07  +07  -06  +06  -02  +03
•      -12  +13  -06  +07  -05  +06
0      -08  +01  -07  +08  -04  +04
0      -12  +15  -08  +10  -08  +01

T      TTT  TTT  HI  TTT  TT?  TTT
0      -11  +11  -12  +10  -10  +07
0      -11  +11  -12  +10  -10  +07
XRG07        20    11          Hi           666       -11     +11           72        0      -14  +16  -08  +08  -07  +07

06001         74           44           254       -01     +12           16        0      -21  +10  -10  +04  -01  +04
unco          74           44           254       -01     +12           16        0      -21  +10  -10  +04  -01  +04

35001         21            8            50       -01     +11            4        0      -08  +02  .-08  +02  -16  +01
HXND          21            8            50       -01     +11            4        1      -08  +02  -08  +02  -06  +01

46001         32           13           112       -08     +08           18       15      -07  +01  -06  +05  -05  +15  -05  +03
«XUT          32           13           112       -08     +08           18       15      -07  +01  -06  +05  -15  +05  -05  +13

MR608        12     6           65           416       -11     +11           38       15      -16  +11  -18  +05  -07  +05  -05  +03

03100         31            1            45«      -11     +14            5        3      -11  +23  -17  +21  -14  +14  -14  +12
03200         72           36           177       -10     +04            1        1      -12  +06  -10  +02  -12  +12
S3300         32            8            42*      -06     +07           21        0      -08  +10  -03  +07  -13  +07
MXAZ         13     4           53           264«      -11     +08           33        3      -11  +13  -01  +11  -10  +01  -14  +12

05001        55     8          118         1,231       -11     +11           63        0      -18  +01  -13  +05  -12  +14
05004        17     4           76           461       -11     +13           42       41      -11  +05  -08  +04  -07  +03  -08  +14
05036         52           32           112       -11     +08            8        6      -08  +06  -03  +05  -03  +05  -04  +04
05061        27     4          130           763       -16     +08           37       18      -20  +07  -01  +16  -06  +06  -07  +06
MXCA        104    IB          436         2.657       -13     +01          151       64      -17  +18  -10  +05  -10  +06  -07  +05

12120         01            T             T       TTT     TTT            T        T      TT?  ?TT  TT?  ??T  TTT  TTT
**HI          01            T             ?       ???     TTT            T        ?      ???  TTT  TTT  TTT  TTT  TTT

21100         21            T             T       TTT     TTT            T        T      TTT  TTT  TTT  TTT  TTT  TTT
29200         12            T             T       TTT     TTT            T        T      TTT  TTT  TTT  TTT  TTT  TT?
29301         11            8            44       -05     +03            4        6      -01  +01  -18  +11  -17  +10  -14  +07
*»NV          33            8            44M      -05     +03            4«       6      -01  +01  -18  +11  -17  +10  -14  +07

MRG01       121    26          417         2,165       -13     +11          181       73      -16  +11  -11  +17  -10  +06  -18  +15

38001         52           18           100X      -15     +03           32        0      -22  +25  -18  +16  -18  +15
•»OR          52           18           100«      -15     +03           32        0      -22  +25  -18  +16  -18  +15
                                                                                                  (continued)

                                                            D-19
-------
                                               TABLE D-4  (Continued)
                                                     AUTOMATED ANALYZERS
                          	-—PRECISION—	        	ACCURACY	
REP.ORG./  NO.   SITES                     NO.        PROBABILITY               NO. AUDITS  	PROBABILITY LIMITS	
STATE/    	-—        NO.        PRECISION      LIMITS             NO.    AT LEVEL   LEVEL  1  LEVEL  2  LEVEL  i  LEVEL
REGION    SLAMS   NAMS     ANALYZERS      CHECKS       LOU      UP        AUDITS      4       LOU   UP  LOU   UP  LOU   UP  LOU   U

4*901        49           Zt           266       -Ot     +tt           It        «      -05  *18  -Ot  +08  -06  +05
K»UA         45           Zt           2ft       -Ot     +0*           It        8      -05  +10  -Ot  +08  -04  +05

KRGlt        *     7           44           Stt       -10     +10           48        0      -18  +21  -15  +14  -15  +13

NATION      Stt   213        Z.ZM        18.822       -It     +0t        1.620      121      -14  +12  -11  +0t  -It  +88  -07  +(
                                                         D-20
-------
 Explanation of Column Heading Abbreviations  for Tables  D-5,  D-6,  D-7,  D-8
                              (Manual  Methods)

     Column
No.    Heading abbreviation     	Explanation    	


 5     NO. COLL.  SITES          Number of sites  where two  samples  are
                                samples are collocated.

 6     NO. RESULTS              Number of paired data sets from  collocated
       < LIMIT                  samplers with  either  result  less than  the
                                tabulated values on Form 1:
                                      TSP:   20  yg/m3
                                      S02'.   40  yg/m3        NOTE:  These are
                                      NOa:   30  yg/m3        not  the  detection
                                       Pb:   0.15  yg/m3     Tfmits.

 9     NO. VALID  COLLOCATED
       DATA PAIRS               Number of pairs  of data from collocated
                                sites with both  valid data values  above
                                the detection  limit.
                                   D-21
-------
                           TABLE D-5.   TSP PRECISION AND ACCURACY  ANNUAL
                                          VALUES FOR REPORTING ORGANIZATIONS
                                                      MANUAL METHODS
REP.ORG./  NO.    SITES
STATE/    	»	
REGION    SLAMS   HAMS
07001        IS   22
XXCT        18   22
20001
XXME

22001
ttXMA

30001
NXNH

41001
MXRI

47001
*XVT

MRG01

31001
XXNJ

33001
KXNY

40001
XXPR

55001
xxvi

XRG02

08001
XKDE

09001
XXOC

21001
21002
21003
21005
21006
 39001
 3S002
 39003
 XXPA
10
10
4
4
11
11
5
5
5
5
53
22
22
72
72
7
7
5
5
106
0
0
2
2
10
5
1
2
1
19
43
14
9
66
1
1
17
17
1
1
6
6
1
1
48
9
9
25
25
7
7
0
0
41
3
3






1
9
33
7
4
44

NO.
SAMPLERS
155
155
40
40
84
84
57
57
48
48
24
24
NO.
COLL.
SITES
12
12
16
16
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
— - — PRECIS
NO.
RESULTS
-------
TABLE D-5 (Continued)
REP.ORG./
CT A TCX
9 1 A 1 C.S
REGION
48001
48002
48003
48005
XKVA
50001
50002
XXUV
XRG03
01011
01012
01013
01014
01015
01016
XXAL
10001
10002
10003
10004
10005
10006
10007
10011
10012
10013
10014
10015
10016
10017
10018
10020
XXFL
11010
XXGA
18001
18002
XXKY
25100
<
-------
              TABLE D-5  (Continued)
REP.ORG.S
CTATC./
9 1 A 1 £'
REGION
44001
44002
44003
44004
44005
MKTN
KR604
14001
14002
14003
«NIL
15001
15002
15003
15005
15008
15009
15010
15100
KXIN
23001
23002
xxril
24001
MMMN
36001
36002
36003
360G4
36005
36006
36007
36008
36009
36010
56012
36013
36014
36015
36016
MMQH
51001
NKUI
KRG05
04002
KNAR
NO.
SLAMS
22
4
7
7
7
47
382
49
9
15
73
17
3
7
10
16
7
8
19
87
38
14
52
32
32
10
8
17
18
5
9
1
22
17
13
11
17
20
9
10
193
58
58
495
23
23
SITES
HAMS
3
6
6
2
4
21
95
21
4
1
26
8
4
2
1
2
0
0
3
20
16
5
21
12
12
5
3
2
a
0
4
5
7
4
7
1
1
1
3
4
47
16
16
142
3
3
MANUAL METHODS
NO. NO. PDnBlRTI TTV
NO.
SAMPLERS
166
40
60
22
52
3*8
COLL. RESULTS LIMITS
..SITES  33
\ 0
1 33
3
3
7
24
6
0
12
1
1
0
0
8
11
8
30
6
8
122
13
13
-11
-13
-18
-13
-14
-11
-09
-15
-09
-08
-12
-12
-13
-10
-20
-13
-08
-08
-13
-12
-08
-07
-38
-07
-06
-11
-32
-16
-15
-10
-14
-04
-09
-17
-06
-06
+13
+10
+13
+13
+08
+10
+11
+14
+18
+08
+18
+25
+17
+09
+27
+14
+09
+09
+17
+15
+09
+08
+48
+09
+11
+14
+26
+07
+20
+04
+16
+10
+09
+18
+08
+08
229
99
92
420
107
111
103
89
107
29*
100
149
795
208
52
260
118
118
109
71
82
79
109
103
125
117
ON
65*
97
114
75
108
56*
1.310
103
105
89
26
20
135
28
34
28
36
19
4*
28
27
204
59
15X
74
65
65
17
6»
19
21
10
17
14
34
17*
28
10M
18
12«
17
18
258
84
84
2,017

  114
  114
248

 11
 11
263

 81
 81
-15

-21
-21
+16

+14
+14
3.008

  146
  146
820

116
116
ACCURACY	
 PROBABILITY LIMIT
   1  LEVEL  Z
  UP  LOU   UP

      -05   +11
      -07   +04
      -03   +04
      -11   +08
      -05   +06
      -06   +08

      -07   +08

      -05   +10
      -05   +06
      -12   +06
      -07   +10

      -06   +04
      -04   +06
      -05   +04
      -03   +03
      -03   +06
      -03   +03
      -04   +07
      -04   +06
      -04   +05

      -05   +03
      -10   +09
      -06   +06

      -04   +05
      -04   +05

      -09   +06
      -13   +10
      -14   +06
      -10   +07
      -10   +12
      -02   +03
      -04   +10
      -12   +08
      -14   +12
      -Of   +06
      -12   +05
      -14   +11
      -16   +02
      -10   +08
      -07   +10
      -11   +08

      -06   +06
      -06   +06

      -08   +08

      -06   +06
      -06   +06
                                                              (continued)
                            D-24
-------
                                    TABLE D-5 (Continued)
REP.ORG./
CTATPV
a 1 A 1 C'
REGION
19001
XMLA
32001
32002
KXNN
37101
37102
37133
KKOK
45001
45002
45003
45004
45605
45006
45007
XXTX
KRG06
16001
16002
16003
XXIQ
17001
XXKS
26001
26002
26003
26004
26005
26006
26007
XKMO
28001
28002
28003
XXNB
MRG07
06001
XXCO
27001
27002
27003
27004
XXMT
NO.
SLAMS
22
22
40
7
47
8
6
S
19
12
2
7
2
3
4
1
31
142
5
2
29
36
12
12
11
2
3
4
6
0
0
28
19
2
9
30
106
39
39
18
3
2
3
26
SITES
HAMS
7
7
0
4
4
2
3
3
8
31
4
1
2
0
5
2
45
67
3
3
8
14
8
8
3
3
3
3
2
0
0
14
0
3
3
6
42
12
12
1
0
1
0
2
35001
MANUAL METHODS

NO.
SAMPLERS
120
120
151
44
195
40
48
40
128
314
133
74
28
34
88
21
694
1.251
61
26
157
243
80
80
7






40
88
24
76
188
un
nu •
COLL.
,. SITES
8
8
15
12
27
8
8
8
24
16
11





67
137
8
8
10
26
11
11
7






40
11
8
8
27
un BBnnABYi f-r\t
nu •
RESULTS
-------
                                             TABLE  D-5 (Continued)
REP.ORG./  NO.
STATE/    	
REGION    SLAMS
KMND

43001
HUSO

46001
MNUT

52001
KMUY

MRG08

03100
03200
033CO
MMAZ

05001
05004
05036
05061
MXCA

12120
NNHI

29100
29200
29300
•XNV

54100
MX6U

HRG09

0202C
M*AK

13001
MKID

38001
•NOR

49001
NXUA

KR610

NATION
     SITES

      NAMS

 18     1
                                                         MANUAL METHODS
                                                   -PRECISION	
 21
 21

  6
  6
118

 20
  4
  7
 31

 61
  3
  4
 15
 83

  5
  5
 2
 2

 8
 8

 1
 1

26
 3
 7

22
 9
 3
10
44

 4
 4
  12     a
   3     2
   4     5
  19     7
 14*    62
  12
  12

  18
  18

  21
  21
 2
 2

 2
 2

 9
 9
  23    12
  23    12

  74    25

1752   636
  NO.
SAMPLERS

     67

     92
     92

     62
     62

     43
     43

    494

     62
     40
     16
    118

    320
     60
     28
    130
    538

     23
     23

     52
      t
     37
     89

      t
      t

    768

     25
     25

     79
     79

    120
    120

    117
    117

    341

  9.821
                      NO.
                     COLL.
                    .SITES
   8
   8

   8
   8

  12
  12

  67

   6
   8
   8
  22

  29
   8
   8
  12
  57

   4
   4

   6
   t
   8
  14

   T
   t

  97

   8
   8

  12
  12

  23
  23

   11
  11

  54

1.324
  NO.
RESULTS
-------
                            TABLE D-5.   PB PRECISION AND  ACCURACY  ANNUAL
                                            VALUES FOR  REPORTING  ORGANIZATIONS
REP.ORG.X  NO.   SITES
STATE/    	
REGION    SLAMS   NAMS
07001       18     2
NNCT        18     2
20001
XXME

22001
30001
XXNH

41001
XXRI

XRG01

31001
XXNJ

3J001
x*NY

40001
XXPR

XRG02

08001
XXDE

09001
XXDC

21001
XXMD

39001
39002
39003
XXPA

48001
48003
XMVA

50001
XXUV

XRG03
 2
 2

 2
 2

 6
 6

 2
 2

30

 8
 8

 7
 7

 2
 2

17

 0
 0

 0
 0

 4
 4
 2
 2

 t
 6

 3
 3

11

 0
 0

 2
 2

 2
 2
 9     0
 1     2
 3     2
13     4
 0
 2
 2

12
12

31
 2
 0
 2

 0
 0

10
  NO.
SAMPLERS
    80
    80

      4
      4

    24
    24

    18
    18

    16
    16

    142

    38
    38

    54
    54

    17
    17

    109

      8
      8

      8
      8

    24
    24

    72
    49
    20
    141

      5
    24
    29

    103
    103

    313
                     NO.
                    COLL.
                    SITES
                        9
                        9

                        2
                        2

                        4
                        4

                        4
                        4

                        4
                        4

                       23
                                           MANUAL METHODS
                                   	PRECISION	
                                     NO.      PROBABILITY
                                   RESULTS      LIMITS
                                   
-------
                                   TABLE D-5 (Continued)
MANUAL METHODS
REP.OR6.
STATE/
REGION
01011
01012
»NAL
10011
10012
10013
10017
10018
XXFL
11018
KXGA
18001
18002
KXKY
25188
«XMS
42081
KMSC
44001
44002
44003
KMTH
/ NO.

SLAMS
1
2
3








5
0
S
4
4






SITES

HAMS
0
a
2
2
9
9
2
2
i
2
2
,
2
2
9
«
8
9
9
2
9
2
NO.
SAMPLERS
4
12
It
8
28
8
It
39
99
4
4
28
3
23
29
29
44
44
S
8
ftS
71
NO.
COLL.
* SITES
3
5
8
4
9
0
2
0
t
3
3
4
t
4
„
•
12
12
1
9
8
8
NO. PROBABILITY
RESULTS LIMITS
-------
                                              TABLE D-5  (Continued)
REP.ORG./  HO.   SITES
STATE/    	
REGION    SLAMS   HAMS
51001
MKUI

HRG09
HRG06
KRG07

06091
MXCO

27001
**MT

44901
MMUT

XRGOB
       2
       2

      22
  NO.
SAMPLERS

     10
     10

    319
  NO.
 COLL.
..SITES

     4
     4

    47
                                            MANUAL METHODS
                                   	PRECISION	
                                      NO.      PROBABILITY
                                    RESULTS      LIMITS
                                    •CLIMIT     LOU      UP
 39
 39

229
-07
-07
+05
+05

+17
NO. VALID
COLLOCATED
DATA PAIRS

      22
      22

     491
04002
KHAR
19001
XMLA
32001
32002
MMNN
37101
37102
37103
MMOK
45001
45002
45003
45006
KXTX
2
2
2
2
2
0
2
9
1
2
3
9
1
7
»
17
0
•
2
2
1
2
2
1
1
•
2
t
2
1
1
10
             26
                   16
16003
MKIO
17081
»«KS
26901
26002
26003
26004
26006
26007
NKMO
28803
HKNB
2
2
1
1
1
a
1
1
2
1
6
2
2
•
B
I
1
•
2
8
1
I
•
3
2
2
11

 9
 5

 7
 7

 3
 3

15
«
8
16
16
•
a
16
3
•
8
19
104
12
32
ft
196
3
3
4
4
6
4
10
0
2
0
2
80
0
4
4
88
77
77
40
40
33
1
34
12
14
12
38
26
46
0
33
105
-13
-13
-19
-19
-10
-23
-16
-26
-23
-12
-19
-18
-21
-06
-35
-21
+17
+17
+24
+24
+11
+12
+13
+20
+25
+16
+21
+34
+24
+07
+36
+26
98
98
55
SS
83
52
140
15
48
60
123
82
288
69
33
463
                               219
                                         107
                                                    294
                                                            -19
                                                                   +22
6
6
8
ft
4
3
1
4
4
4
19
28
28
i
t
4
4
a
2
t
4
a
a
6
4
4
18
18
33
33
0
7
?
e
3
a
10
27
27
-15
-15
-23
-23
-13
-25
?!?
-34
-28
-28
-26
-OS
-95
+13
+13
+38
+38
+99
+38
f?f
+38
+16
+28
+26
+05
+05
                                                                                879

                                                                                 12
                                                                                 12

                                                                                 37
                                                                                 37
     61

     44
     44

     ft
     8

     15
     15

     67
   28

    4
    4

    4
    4

    3
    3

   11
 88

  0
  0

  2
  2

 15
 15

 17
-24

-08
-98

-31
-31

-27
-27

-29
+25

+11
+11

+19
+19

+20
+29

+19
      68
      $0

     117

      12
      12

     IJ.K
     119

      4%
      44

     166
	—ACCURACY	
           	PROBABILITY LIC
  NO.      LEVEL  1   LEVEL  2
AUDITS     LOU   UP   LOU   UP

   24      -97  +08   -02  +06
   24      -97  +08   -02  +06

  521      -09  +07   -10  +06

   25      -05  +15   -09  +06
   25      -05  +15   -09  +06,

   23      -09  +12   -03  +07
   23      -09  +12   -03  +87

   20      -08  +06   -05  +07
   17      -09  + 8i   -05  +07
   37      -08  +06   -05  +07

    9      -12  +10   -13  +03
   12      -04  +04   -06  +08
   28      -03  +05   -05  +04
   49      -06  +06   -88  +06

   12*     -21  +24   -09  +25
   24      -09  +10   -09  +87
   24      -09  +83   -19  +86
   18      -12  +11   -06  +83
   78      -13  +12   -12  +12

  212      -18  +11   -89  +8f

   12      -05  +01   -86  +02
   12      -05  +01   -06  +02

   24      -13  +11   -II  -92
   24      -IS  +11   -11  -02

   12      -11  +01   -OS  -OS
   19      -84  +04   -03  +64
    t      ???  ???   ???  ???
   20      -21  +07   -12  +85
   26      -09  +86   -10  +94
   47      -12  +18   -87  +18
  144      -14  +14   -12  +14

   16      -13  -01   -08  +87
   16      -13  -81   -08  +87

  196      -14  +12   -13  +12

   16      -18  +19   -09  +15
   16      -18  +18   -99  +15

   25      -86  +83   -86  +83
   25      -06  +03   -86  +03

   19      -87  +14   -16  +10
   18      -07  +14   -16  +18

   51      -09  +09   -12  +12
                                                                                           (continued)
                                                        D-29
-------
                                           TABLE D-5  (Continued)
REP.ORG./  NO.
STATE/    	
REGION    SLAMS
     SITES
                 HAMS
03100
03200
03300
MXAZ

05001
05004
05036
05061
NMCA

12120
 9     •
 7     2
 2     0
18     2

29     2
 9     4
 1     2
20     3
59    11

 0     2
 0     2
29300
KMNV

KRG09

02020
N«AK

13001
MNID

38001
»KOR

49001
KMUA

KR610

NATION
  1
  1

 78

  2
  2

  9
  S

 11
 11

  7
  7
       0
       0

      19
MANUAL METHODS

NO.
SAMPLERS
33
2
4
39
123
4
1
130
257
3
3
T
t
NO.
COLL.
..SITES
4
2
0
«
11
4
t
•
15
i
i
T
t
NO. PROBABILITY
RESULTS
-------
TABLE D-7.   MANUAL S02  PRECISION AND ACCURACY ANNUAL
               VALUES FOR  REPORTING ORGANIZATIONS
MANUAL METHODS
REP.ORG./
NO. SITES
REGION SLAMS
10001
10004
10012
10014
10017
XXFL
XRG04
52001
XXNM
XRG06
12120
XXHI
54100
XXGU
XRG09
NATION
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
4
4
3
3
7
9
un
NAMS SAMPLERS
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
a
0
0
0
ti
0
0
0
0
24
6
28
14
0
72
72
0
»
t
8
8
I
!
8
80
NO.
COLL .
SITES
8
2
8
4
0
22
22
0
?
!
2
2
?
*
2
24
NO. PROBABILITY NO. VALID
RESULTS ' TMTT4 CHI 1 OCATFD
-------
TABLE D-8.  MANUAL  NOa  PRECISION AND ACCURACY ANNUAL
            VALUES  FOR  REPORTING ORGANIZATIONS
                     MANUAL METHODS
REP.ORG./
STATE/
REGION
10001
10012
10017
XXFL
XRG04
14002
S!!fIL
KRG05
19001
»»LA
XRG06
16002
XXIQ
XRG07
NATION
NO. SITES
SLAMS
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
a
13
13
13
0
9
9
IS
tin
NAMS SAMPLERS
9
0
0
0
0
a
9
9
9
a
e
9
9
9
s
18
29
29
58
58
32
32
32
52
52
52
2
2
2
144
NO.
COLL .
SITES
6
a
8
22
22
8
8
8
8
8
8
2
2
2
4$
	 fKtti:
NO.
RESULTS
1UN 	
PROBABILITY
LIMITS
LOU UP
-51
-15
-05
-28
-28
-16
-16
-16
-28
-28
-28
-49
-49
-49
-27
+65
+17
+ 97
+32
+32
+18
+18
+18
+25
+25
+25
+42
+42
+42
+29
NO. VALID
COLLOCATED
DATA PAIRS
62
87
129
269
269
190
190
190
190
190
199
0
9
9
469

NO.
AUDITS
7
39
61
98
98
23
23
23
31
31
31
9
9
9
161


ACCURACY 	
-PROBABILITY LIMITS-
LEVEL 1
LOU UP
-93
-05
-08
-07
-07
-06
-06
-06
-03
-93
-93
-99
-99
-09
-07
+ 03
+04
+ 12
+ 10
+ 10
+06
+ 06
+ 06
+ 93
+ 93
+ 93
+96
+06
+96
+ 98
LtVtL 2
LOU UP
-94
-04
-03
-04
-04
-02
-02
-02
-02
-02
-02
-06
-06
-06
-03
+ 97
+ 94
+ 96
+ 96
+ 06
+ 94
+ 94
+ 94
+02
+ 02
+02
+05
+95
+95
+05


LtvtL. J
LOU UP
-06
-03
-03
-03
-03
-92
-02
-02
-01
-01
-01
-07
-07
-07
-03
+ 06
+ 04
+ 95
+ 05
+05
+ 05
+ 05
+05
+ 92
+ 02
+02
+ 07
+07
+ 07
+05
                        D-32
-------
                                 APPENDIX E

     PROBLEMS INVOLVED  IN THE  COMPARISON  OF  PERFORMANCE  AUDIT  (PA)  DATA
                   AND PRECISION AND ACCURACY (PARS) DATA
     Several problems are encountered when attempting to compare Performance
Audit (PA) data and Precision and Accuracy (PARS)  data.  Obviously, compari-
sons can  be made  only  where  the   same  pollutant measurement  methods  are
audited In both programs.  The  following pollutant measurement methods  are
audited in both programs.

             Continuous Methods       CO
             Manual Methods           TSP
                                      Pb
                                      S02
                                      N02

Further, only the accuracies of the PARS  system  can  be compared because no
precision assessments are currently made from the PA data.

     Other factors to consider in making comparisons are:

     1.  source of data (organization performing the audits),
     2.  time of audit, and
     3.  concentration level (or flow rate level  for TSP).

     Valid comparisons can  only  be made for  those  organizations where both
the PA  and  the  PARS audits are performed.   The  PARS data are  reported  by
Reporting Organization, whereas  the PA  data are  reported  by  Laboratory.

     A cross-reference listing has been prepared to match up each Reporting
Organization number with its corresponding Laboratory number.  The compari-
sons made on a state, regional, or national basis are made using only those
Reporting Organization-Laboratory match-ups where  both  have  reported accu-
racy audit data.

     Good agreement should  be  expected  between  the PARS and PA data  for a
given Reporting Organization-Laboratory combination  if  the  two  audits were
performed at nearly  the  same time.  However, the  PA audits are  scheduled
at various times during the year.  And, the  regulation  requirement for the
PARS accuracy audit is that (1)  at least one audit per year shall  be con-
ducted on each instrument (or site)  for continuous  instruments  (CO and $02)
and for the TSP  method and  (2)  at least two audits  per quarter  shall  be
                                    E-l
-------
conducted at the laboratory for the manual Pb, S02, and N02 methods.   Fur-
ther, there is  no  requirement  or  planned schedules to assure that  the two
types of audits are conducted at nearly the same  time.  The comparisons can
therefore be made  only on  an annual  basis for a given Reporting  Organiza-
tion-Laboratory matchup.    Comparisons  for the continuous  methods,  CO  and_
S02, and TSP cannot be made on an individual site (instrument)  basis  because"
the PARS data are  not  reported on a  site basis  although  the PA  data  are.
(Beginning January 1, 1987, these  PARS data will be reported to EMSL by  site
so that it will be  possible  to make comparisons on a  site  basis.   However,
because of the possible large differences in  times  of  the audits,  such  com-
parisons may not be meaningful.)

     Because of the relatively small  amount of data for comparison on a Re-
porting Organization-Laboratory basis  and the time differences, study of the
comparisons of PA  and PARS data has  been limited to  comparisons  of larger
samples or  aggregates  of  data, i.e.,  on a  Regional or  National basis.

     Another bothersome problem in comparing  PA  and PARS  data is  that the
concentration levels do not correspond.  The  concentration  levels  are fixed
by regulation for  the PARS accuracy  audits whereas the levels for  PA  vary
from year to year and in some cases from audit to audit.   Because of these
variations in concentration for the PA audits, the  concentration  levels for
PARS are used as a  basis for defining  concentration ranges for comparison.

     The following  tables  present  the  concentration  levels for PARS  as
specified by the regulation  and the concentration levels actually used for
PA audits during calendar year 1985.

               TABLE E-l.  CONCENTRATION LEVELS FOR PARS AND
                           PA AUDITS FOR 1985 FOR THE  CONTIN-
                           UOUS METHODS
Pollutant
CO
S02
Concentration
PARS
3- 8
15-20
35-45
80-90
.03-. 08
.15-. 20
.35-. 45
.80-. 90
levels, ppm
PA
6.70
16.50
39.90
.05-. 08
.17-. 20
.22-. 26
.40-. 49
                                                        .62-.69
                                    E-2
-------
         TABLE E-2.  CONCENTRATION (OR FLOW)  LEVELS FOR
                     PARS AND PA AUDITS FOR 1985 FOR
                     MANUAL METHODS
Concentration (or flow) levels
Pollutant PARS PA
TSP f t3/mi n
50
( nomi nal )
40-60



Pb yg/strip
100- 300
600-1000




S02 yg/ml
0.2-0.3
0.5-0.6
0.8-0.9


N02 yg/ml
0.2-0.3
0.5-0.6
0.8-0.9


m3min
1.416*

1.133-1.699



yg/m3
0.6-1.8*
3.5-5.9




PPM
.013-. 020*
.033-. 040
.053-. 059


PP"i
.018-. 028*
.046-. 055
.074-. 083


m3/min
.7
.9
1.1
1.2
1.3
1/85
yg/m3
0.53
1.06
3.03
4.31
4.83
6.65
yg/m3
44.30
61.00
90.60
124.50
271.90
yg/ml
.345
.434
.686
.944
1.114
ftVmin
24.7
31.8
38.8
42.4
45.9
7/85
yg/m3
0.45
1.00
1.15
2.00
2.70
5.40
PPM
.017
.023
.034
.0473
.103
yg/m3 ppm
59.90 .032
75.35 .040
119.10 .063
163.89 .087
193.40 .103
*See conversion factors on following page.
                              E-3
-------
                             Conversion Factors
        To convert

        ft3 to in3

        yg/m3 to ppm
           S02
           CO
           03

        yg/strip to yg/m3  for Pb
Multiply by

  0.02832
  0.00038
  0.00053
  0.00087
  0.00051

  0.00589

3/4
12 exposed
yg strips
"x8" strip 8"xlO" filter 50
= .00589 yg/m3
1
ft3/min
1 filter/day
1440 min/day
1
.02832 m3/ft3
         yg/ml  to yg/m3
  173.61
ug
ml
50 ml
sample
1 sample/day
.2 L/min
1
1440 min/day
1000 L
m3
                 = 173.61  yg/m3


         yg/ml  to ppm

              S02  (173.61)(0.00038)  = 0.066

              N02  (173.61)(0.00053)  = 0.092
     The following example illustrates the procedure for establishing the
concentration ranges for comparison purposes.   For CO the four accuracy
audit levels for the PARS are 3-8,  15-20,  35-45,  and 80-90 ppm.   During
1985 the three concentration levels for the performance audits were 6.70,
16.50, and 39.90 ppm.  The calculated midpoints between the adjacent con-
centration levels for the PARS are  considered the boundaries of the ranges
for comparison:
                                    E-4
-------
Comparison
levels
1
2
3
4
Cone.
levels,
ppm
3-8
15-20
35-45
80-90
Calculated
midpoints,
ppm
11.5
27.5
62.5
Ranges for
comparison,
ppm
0-11.5
11.5-27.5
27.5-62.5
62.5-
Performance
audit levels,
ppm
6.70
16.50
39.90
     As shown above the calculated midpoint between 8,  the upper limit of
PARS level 1, and 15, the lower limit of  PARS  level 2,  is
Similarly the calculated midpoint between  comparison  levels 2 and 3 is 27.5
ppm, and between levels 3 and 4,  62.5  ppm.   Thus,  the newly defined CO
ranges for comparison are

                  0   to 11.5
                 11.5 to 27.5
                 27.5 to 62.5
       a nd       62.5 and above.

Therefore, the results of PA audits  at 6.70  ppm  are compared with the re-
sults of PARS audits at 3 to 8 ppm,  etc.,  shown  in the above table.

     Following the same procedure,  the comparison  ranges  for all the pol-
lutant methods have been computed and  are  summarized  in Tables E-3 and E-4.

     The problem in comparing results  within the defined  ranges are illus-
trated by Figures E-l and E-2.
                                    E-5
-------
   1   I
CO    I
PARS
PA

(
PARS
PA

C
9 9


] 1
1
S02
r *~~*
• jm—

0.
A A ' ^ ~
1 * *
1
• i B
i ! i
1-5 27.5 50 62.5 1(
ppm
213 4
1 1
• • ] • • • •
" ! " " "
115 0.275 0.5 0.625 1
ppm
Figure E-l.  Concentration levels for comparing  PARS  and
             PA data,  continuous methods.
                          E-6
-------
PARS
  PA
TSP
• • |
1 1
• A

1 1 1 1 1 1
   20
30
40
50
60
     Pb
HAKS
PA
1
1
1
1 111 I 1 1 1
} 2.65 5
pg/m3

1 1 1
10
PARS
  PA
so2 1

I I
I 2 I 3
I I
i ^ * i A — ^
] W W \ W W
1 1
1 1
• 1 • •
' • •
1 i
! i ill i i


1 1 1
                   0.027
                0.047 0.05
                   ppm
                                       0.1
PARS
PA

[
I\I02 1
A . .A

I I I
) 0.0
2
	 .,,.^
• •
I I
37 0.05 0.0
ppm
3
• »
• m .
I 1 I I
65 0.1
    Figure E-2.   Concentration or  flow levels for comparing PARS
                  and PA data, manual  methods.
                                 E-7
-------
          TABLE E-3.  CONCENTRATION RANGES FOR COMPARISON OF PARS
                       AND PA DATA - CONTINUOUS METHODS
                            PARS                          ~~~
                            cone.    Calculated     Ranges for       PA
             Comparison    levels,    midpoints,    comparison,    levels,
Pollutant	level	ppm         ppm	ppm	ppm

  CO            1            3-8                        0-11.5       6.70
                                        11.5
                2           15-20                    11.5-27.5      16.50
                                        27.5
                3           35-45                    27.5-62.5      39.90
                                        62.5
                4           80-90         '          62.5-
  S02           1          .03-.08                      0-.115     .05-.08
                                        .115
                2          .15-.20                   .115-.275    T.17-.20
                                                                  L-22-.26
                                        .275
                3          .35-.45      "             .275-.625     .40-.49
                                        .625
                4          .80-.90                   .625-
                                    E-8
-------
TABLE E-4.  RANGES FOR COMPARISON OF PARS AND PA DATA -
            MANUAL METHODS
Comparison PARS Calculated Ranges for Performance
Pollutant level level mid-point comparison audit levels
ft3/min
TSP 2 40-60 NA




yg/m3
all |~24.7





31.8
38.8
42.4
45.9

1/85 7/85
Pb 1 0.6-1.8


2.65
2 3.5-5.9 2.


ppm
S02 1 .013-. 020
.027
0-2.65 f .
U-



65- f3.
4.
4.
J.

53 f .45
06 1.00
1.15
2.00

03 f2.70
31 [5.40
83
65

0-.027 f.017
\_.023


2 .033-. 040 .027-. 047 .034
.047


3 .053-. 059 .047- C .0473
N02 1 .018-. 028
.037
•*••
0-.037 .032


2 .046-. 055 .037-. 065 f .040
(_.063
.065


3 .074-. 083 .065- f .087
.103
                          E-9
-------
     As shown in  Table  E-3, the  results  of  level  2 PARS  continuous  S02
accuracy audits  at concentrations  .15-.20  ppm are  compared with  the  results
of performance  audits  at  concentration   levels  .17-.20 and  .22-.26  ppm.

     And, from Table E-4,  the results  of level  1 PARS Pb accuracy  audits at
concentrations 0.6-1.8 yg/m3 are compared with the results of  performance
audits at concentration levels  .53 and 1.06 yg/m3 of  the  1/85 audit  and
.45, 1.00, 1.15, and 2.00  yg/m3  of the 7/85  audit.

     It has been recommended that  the  concentration levels  for the perform-
ance audits be  adjusted to more closely correspond to those of  the  PARS in
order to provide more valid comparisons.

     Another factor which  makes the PA and  PARS comparisons  somewhat  com-
plicated is the  reporting  units  which  differ for some of the pollutant mea-
surement methods and  which require the conversion of units.  Further,  the
persons submitting  data are required  to  convert  some  informational  items
to computer codes:   methods, units,  laboratory names/addresses,  reporting
organization names/addresses, audit levels (for PARS only),  etc.   These con-
versions could be the source of  some errors  in proper identification of the
data used in snaking the comparisons.
                                    E-10
-------
                                 APPENDIX F

                COMPARISONS DF PARS AND PERFORMANCE AUDIT DATA
NOTE:   For Tables F-l and F-2,  the  number of audits listed for both PA and
       PARS consider each individual  audit at each level as a separate audit.
       For example,  consider  CO for Connecticut, Reporting Organization 07001,
       Table E-l  lists  3  audits for PA and 6 audits for PARS.  The 6 audits
       for PARS could have been 2 audits at level 1, 2 at level 2, and 2 at
       level 3, or some other combination totalling 6 audits.
                                    F-l
-------
                 TABLE F-l.  PARS AND PA DATA FOR CO, PB, TSP,
                            N02 (MANUAL) AND S02 (MANUAL) METHODS


ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY   EMSL  PRECISION/ACCURACY  REPORTING SYSTEM

             COMPARISON REPORT  OF BADHS  ACCURACY AUDITS & PARS
DATE 11/17/86               DATA SELECTED FOR YEAR 1985           PAGE NO.     1
REGION  01   STATE  07  CONNECTICUT                REP ORG   001   LAB  306001

                       	PROBABILITY LIMITS	

 POL.CD.     AUDITS     LEVEL 1        LEVEL 2       LEVEL  3       LEVEL H
                       LOW    UP      IOW    UP     LOW     UP      LOU    UP

C42101 CO        3      +1    +1
   PARS      (    6)  (  -6)( +14)   (   -5)(  +5)  (  -2)(   + 3)

111101 HIV       5                     -9    +5
   PARS      (   58)                 (   -7)(  +5)

112128 LEAD     12     -11    +6       -6    +3
   PARS      C   21)  ( -10H  +7)   (   -8H  +6)
REGION   01   STATE  20  MAINE                      REP ORG   001  LAB  301001

                       	PROBABILITY LIMITS	

 POL. CD.     MJ3TT:;     LEVZ".  1        LEVEL 2       LFVKL  ?       LFVEI- '*
                       LCi:     liF      LOU    Ui>     LOU     UP     LOU    UP

C42101 CO        3      +7     +7       +5    +5      +5     +5
   PARS      t    

112128 LEAD      6      -2     •»-•?      -13    -i^
   PARS      C   23)  ( -13X +10)   t   -7) C  +3)
                                                  (continued)

                                     F-2
-------
                           TABLE F-l  (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY
       EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING  SYSTEM
             COMPARISON REPORT OF 2ADHS  ACCURACY AUDITS £ PARS
DATE 11/17/86
DATA SELECTED  FOR  YEAR 1985
PAGE NO.
REGION  01   STATE   22  MASSACHUSETTS
                       SUP CRG  oa:  LAB   20^001
POL. CD.

111*01 HIV
PARS
112128 LEAD
PARS
AUDITS

28
( 96)
12
( 12)
LEVEL 1
LOU UP


-5 +10
C -3)( +4)
LEVEL
LOU
-7
( -14)(
-19
( -13H
Rcj.iij.j.1 4jj.nj.io 	
2 LEVEL 3
UP LOU UP
+ 6
+ 9)
+ 5
+ 10)
LEVEL 4
LOU UP




HEGIOX  01  STATE   30  NEW HAMPSHIRE
                       REP ORG  001  LAB   302001
POL. CD.

11

11


1101 HIV
PARS
2128 LEAD
PARS
AUDITS

29
( 35)
6
C 15)
LEVEL
LOU


+ 8
( -20)C
1
UP


+ 29
+ 25)
	 fKUB
LEVEL
LOU
-2
( -6)(
-6
( -3)C
ABj.iij.ii iij.nj.is 	
2 LEVEL 3
UP LOU UP
+ 1
+ 3)
+ 4
+ 12)
LEVEL 4
LOU UP




                                                (continued)
                                   F-3
-------
                            TABLE  F-l  (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
       EMSL  PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING SYSTEM
            COMPARISON REPORT OF 2ADHS  ACCURACY AUDITS £  PARS
DATE 11/17/86
DATA SELECTED  FOR YEAR 1985
PAGE NO.
REGION  01   STATE   41   RHODE ISLAND
                       REP ORG   001   LAB  305001
POL. CD. AUDITS

C42

111

112


101 CO
PARS (
101 HIV
PARS (
128 LEAD
PARS (

6
11)
28
55)
12
24)
	 f KUB
LEVEL 1 LEVEL
LOU UP LOW
-3 +5 +0
( -1)( +6) ( -3)(
-1 1
( -7)(
-7 +7 -10
( -14)( +11) ( -7)C
ABJ..LJ.TX .LJ.ri.LJL:> 	
2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4
UP LOW UP LOW UP
+3 -1 +1
+2) ( -3)( +3)
+ 9
+7)
+ 3
+ 8)
REGION   01   STATE  47  VERMONT
                       REP ORG   001  LAB  303001
POL. CD.

CUj; -j o 1 CO
PARS
111101 HIV
PARS
AUDITS

3
( 4)
42
( 35)
LEVEL 1
LOU UP
+ 5 +5
( -11)( +9)


	 PKUBJ
LEVEL
LOU
+ 3
( -7)(
-8
( -1 ) (
USJ.I.J.J.
2
UP
+ 3
+ 7)
+ 6
+ 4)
i juj.ru.T:>
LEVEL
LOU
+ 3
( -6)(


3
UP
+ 3
+ 10)


LEVEL 4
LOU UP




                                                 (continued)
                                    F-4
-------
                           TABLE F-l  (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY
       EMSL  PRECISION/ACCURACY  REPORTING SYSTEM
             COMPARISON REPORT OF  2ADHS ACCURACY AUDITS  £  PARS
DATE 11/17/86
DATA SELECTED  FOR YEAR 1985
PAGE NO.
REGION  02   STATE  31  NEW JERSEY
                       REP ORG   001   LAB  308001
POL. CD.
C42101 CO
PARS
112128 LEAD
PARS
REGION 02
POL. CD.
C42101 CO
PARS
111101 HIV
PARS
112128 LEAD
PARS
AUDITS
24
( 28)
12
( 21)
STATE
AUDiTS
6
( 69)
73
( 150)
12
( 12)
LEVEL 1
LOU UP
-3 +2
( -8)( +13)
-15 +10
( +1)( +8)
33 NEU YORK
LEVEL 1
LOU UP
( -11)( +10)

-10 +26
( -2)( +10)
LEVEL
LOU
+ 0
-9

r KU D
LEVEL
LOU.
-1
-12
( -3H
-14
A1JXX,X.I I
2
UP
+ 5
+ 10) (
+ 6
+ 5)
ABILITY
2
UP
+ 4
+ 6) (
+ 21
+ 6)
+ 19
+ 9)
iixnx-ra 	
LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4
LOU UP LOU UP
+ 2 +7
-8)( +10)

REP ORG 001 LAB 307001
TTMTT1^? — — » » » _ «..««_«_.-.» _
LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4
LCU UP LOU UP
-2 +4
-3)( +3)


                                                 (continued)
                                    F-5
-------
                            TABLE  F-l (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY
                       EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING  SYSTEM
             COMPARISON REPORT OF  2ADHS ACCURACY AUDITS  £  PARS
DATE 11/17/86               DATA SELECTED FOR YEAR  1985
                                                      PAGE  NO.
REGION  02   STATE  40  PUERTO RICO
                                       REP ORG  001  LAB   309001
POL. CD.

C42101 CO
PARS
111101 HIV
PARS
112128 LEAD
PARS
AUDITS

6
( 7)
29
( 53)
12
( 25)
LEVEL
LOU
-1
( -5)(


-6
C -14M
1
UP
+ 1
+ 10)


+ 6
+ 10)
	 VK.VB
LEVEL
LOU
«_ O
( -8)(
-6
( -6)C
-3
( -7) (
ADJ.I.J.II iij.nj.id 	
2 LEVEL 3
UP LOU UP
+3 -2 +6
+9) ( -8)( +10)
+ 9
+ 8)
+ 3
+ 10)
LEVEL 4
LOU UP






REGION   02   STATE  55  VIRGIN ISLANDS
                                       REP ORG  001  LAB   310001
                                       -PROBABILITY LIMITS-
 POL.CD.
AUDITS
 LEVEL 1
LOU    UP
 LEVEL 2
LOU    UP
 LEVEL 3
LOU    UP
 LEVEL 4
LOU    UP
              ** DATA FOR COMPARISON HAS UNAVAILABLE  **
                                                  (continued)
                                    F-6
-------
                           TABLE F-l (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  AGENCY    EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING  SYSTEM

            COMPARISON  REPORT  OF 2ADKS ACCURACY AUDITS £ PARS
DATE 11/17X8C               DATA  SELECTED FOS YEAR 1985           PAGE NO.
REGION  03  STATE   08   DELAWARE                  REP ORG  001   LAB   313002

                       	PROBABILITY LIMITS	

 POL.CD.    AUDITS      LEVEL  1        LEVEL 2       LEVEL 3        LEVEL  4
                       LOU     UP     LOW    UP     LOW    UP      LOW     UP

C42101 CO       6      -12     +9      -3    +2      -1    +1
   PARS     (   8)   (   -7)C +16)   (   -7)(  +8)  (  -4H  +8)

111101 HIV     28                     -9   +12
   PARS     (  11)                 (  -12)C +11)

112128 LEAD    12      -19   +12      -8    -3
   PARS     (   8)   (  -21H +14)   (   -9)(  +9)
REGION  03  STATE   09   DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA      REP ORG  001   LAB   312100

                       	PROBABILITY LIMITS	

 POL.CD.    AUDITS      LEVEL  1        LEVEL 2       LEVEL 3        LEVEL  H
                       LOW     UP     LOW    UP     LOW    UP      LOW     UP

             ** DATA FOR COMPARISON WAS UNAVAILABLE **
                                                (continued)

                                   F-7
-------
                            TABLE F-l (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY
                       EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY  REPORTING SYSTEM
            COMPARISON REPORT OF BADHS  ACCURACY AUDITS £ PARS
DATE 11/17/86
               DATA  SELECTED FOR YEAR  1985
PAGE NO.
REGION  03  STATE   21   MARYLAND
                                      REP  ORG   001  LAB  312001
POL. CD.

C4210I CO
PARS
112128 LEAD
P'iP.S
AUDITS

15
( 24)
12
( 53)
LEVEL 1
LOU UP
-9 +10
( -7)C + 8)
-24 +17
C -10M +2)
	 rttuBi
LEVEL
LOU
-3
( -6)(
-7
( -8) (
1-BJ.XiX
2
UP
+ 5
+ 4)
+ 5
+ 0)
ii iiXnxii-
LEVEL
LOW
-1
( -5H


3
UP
+ 5
+ 4)


LEVEL 4
LOW UP




REGION  03   STATE  21  MARYLAND
 POL. CD.
AUDITS
 LEVEL 1
LOU    UP
 :1U01 HIV      64
   PARS      (   10)
                                       REP  ORG  002  LAB  312001

                          -PROBABILITY LIMITS	
   LEVEL 2
  LOU    UP

   -7    +8
(  -12M +15)
 LEVEL 3
LOU    UP
 LEVEL  4
LOU     UP
                                                  (continued)
                                    F-8
-------
                           TABLE F-l  (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY
                       EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING SYSTEM
            COMPARISON REPORT OF BADHS  ACCURACY AUDITS £ PARS
DATE 11/17/86
                DATA SELECTED FOR YEAR  1985
                                            PAGE NO.
REGION  03  STATE   21   MARYLAND
 POL.CD.
AUDITS
 LEVEL 1
LOW    UP
111101 HIV      32
   PARS      (   14)
                                       REP  ORG  003  LAB

                          -PROBABILITY LIMITS	
   LEVEL 2
  LOW    UP

  -11   +16
(  -13)( +24)
 LEVEL 3
LOU    UP
 LEVEL 4
LOU    UP
REGION  03  STATE   21   MARYLAND
 POL.CD.
AUDIT:
 LEVEL  1
LOW     UP
111101 HIV      30
   PARS      (    9)
                                      REP  ORG  005  LAB  412002

                          -PROBABILITY  LIMITS	
   LEVEL 2
  LOW    UP

   -4    +6
(   -8)C +11)
 LEVEL 3
LOW    UP
 LEVEL 4
LOW    UP
                                                 (continued)
                                    F-9
-------
                           TABLE F-l  (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING  SYSTEM

            COMPARISON REPORT OF 2ADHS ACCURACY AUDITS £ PARS
DATE 11/17/86               DATA SELECTED  FOR YEAR 1985           PAGE NO.
REGION  03  STATE   21   MARYLAND
                                                   REP ORG  006  LAB   412006
                                       -PROBABILITY
 POL. CD.
            AUDITS
 LEVEL 1
LOW    UP
111101 HIV      32
   PARS      (    6)
   LEVEL 2
  LOW    UP

   -7   +10
(   -6M  +9)
                                     LEVEL  3
                                    LOW     UP
 LEVEL 4
LOW    UP
REGION  03  STATE   39   PENNSYLVANIA               REP ORG  001  LAB   311002

                       	PROBABILITY LIMITS	
 POL.CD.
C42101 CO
   PARS
            AUDITS
 LEVEL 1
LOW    UP
Id      -8    +3
24)  ( -15M  +8)
111101 HIV      35
             (  126)
112128 LEAD     12      -20    +6
   PARS      (   28)   (  -11M  +8)
   LEVEL 2
  LOW    UP
                                     -11
                                      -6
                                     -10
                      + 3
                      + 4)

                      + 8
                      + 9)

                      -t-7
                      + 4)
                                     LEVEL  3
                                    LOW     UP
                 -11
                                                           + 5)
 LEVEL 4
LOW    UP
                                     F-10
                                                  (continued)
-------
                            TABLE F-l (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY   EMSL  PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING  SYSTEM

             COMPARISON REPORT OF 2ADHS  ACCURACY AUDITS £ PARS
DATE  11/17/86               DATA SELECTED  FOR YEAR 1985           PAGE NO.    10
REGION  03   STATE  39  PENNSYLVANIA               REP ORG  002   LAB   411002

                       	PROBABILITY LIMITS	

 POL.CD.     AUDITS     LEVEL 1        LEVEL  2        LEVEL 3        LEVEL 4
                       LOW    UP     LOW     UP     LOW    UP     LOW     UP

111101 HIV      39                     -6     +7
   PARS      (  113)                 (   -9)(   +6)
REGION  03  STATE   39   PENNSYLVANIA               REP ORG  003  LAB   411001

                       	PROBABILITY LIMITS	

 POL.CD.    AUDITS      LEVEL 1       LEVEL  2        LEVEL 3       LEVEL  4
                       LOW    UP     LOW     UP      LOW    UP     LOW     UP

111101 HIV      31                     -4     +3
   PARS     (   15)                 (  -6)(   +7)
                                                 (continued)

                                    F-ll
-------
                           TABLE F-l (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   EMSL  PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING SYSTEM
            COMPARISON REPORT OF BADHS  ACCURACY AUDITS £ PARS
DATE 11/17/86
               DATA SELECTED FOR YEAR  1985
                                                                   PAGE NO.
                                                       11
REGION  03  STATE   48  VIRGINIA
                                      REP ORG   001   LAB  315001
POL. CD.

C42101 CO
PARS
111101 HIV
PARS
112128 LEAD
PARS
AUDITS

18
( 8)
32
( 61)
12
( 16)
LEVEL 1
LOU UP
-4 +4
( -5)( +4)


-31 +33
( -19)( +12)
	 PKUHJ
LEVEL
LOU
-3
( -7)(
-4
( -7)(
-12
( -10K
IBJ.LJ.
2
UP
+ 1
+ 3)
+ 5
+ 8)
HI
+ 4)
1 1 iiJ.nj.Ti 	
LEVEL 3
LOU UP
-2 +1
( -7M +3)




LEVEL 4
LOU UP






REGION   03   STATE  48  VIRGINIA
 POL.CD.
                                       REP  ORG

                           -PROBABILITY LIMITS-
                                      002   LAB  415005
AUDITS
 LEVEL 1
LOU    UP
 LEVEL 2
LOU    UP
 LEVEL 3
LOU    UP
 LEVEL 4
LOU    UP
              ** DATA FOR COMPARISON UAS UNAVAILABLE  **
                                                  (continued)
                                    F-12
-------
                             TABLE F-l (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  AGENCY
       EMSI  PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING  SYSTEM
             COMPARISON  REPORT OF op.DHS  ACCURACY AUDITS  £ PARS
DATE  11/17/86
DATA SELECTED FOR YEAR  1985
f  PAGE NO.
12
REGION   03   STATE  48   VIRGINIA
                                            415004
POL. CD.
C42101 CO
PARS
111101 HIV
PARS
112128 LEAD
PARS
REGION 03
POL. CD.
111101 HIV
PARS
AUDITS
15
( 13)
40
( 20)
12
( 25)
STATE
JUDITS
30
( 10)
LEVEL
LOU
-13
( -4)C

-8 +
( -3)(
1
UP
11
+ 4)

11
+ 4)
48 VIRGINIA
LEVEL
LOU

1
UP

	 rtiVB
LEVEL
LOU
-15
( -3)(
-5
( -8)(
-6
( -1)(
2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4
UP LOU UP LOU UP
-10 -13 -11
+5) ( -3)( +9)
+ 4
+ 3)
+ 1
+ 3)
REP ORG 005 LAB 415001
LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4
LOU UP LOU UP LOU UP
-5
( -3H
+ 8
+ 4)
                                                  (continued)
                                     F-13
-------
                           TABLE F-l (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY   EMSL  PRECISION/ACCURACY  REPORTING SYSTEM
             COMPARISON REPORT OF 2ADHS  ACCURACY AUDITS £  PARS
DATE 11/17/86
DATA SELECTED  FOR YEAR 1985
                                                                   PRGE MO,
REGION 03 STATE 50 UEST VIRGINIA REP ORG 001 LAB 314001
POL. CD. AUDITS
C42
101 CO
PARS C
142401 S02
PARS (
111
112
101 HIV
PARS (
128 LEAD
PARS (
6
3)
5
24)
30
16)
12
61)
LEVEL 1
LOU UP
-19 +9
( -10)( +3)
-24 -24
( -12)( +8)

-3 +8
( -6)( +7)
LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4
LOW UP LOU UP LOU UP
-7 +10 -2 +5
( -4)( +0) ( -8)( -2)
-19 +13 +2 +2 +3 +3
( -7)( +8) ( -8)C +7) ( -7)( +5)
-6 +8
( -7)( +4)
-10 +5
( -9)( +3)
REGION  03   STATE   50  WEST VIRGINIA
                       REP ORG  002   LAB  314002


I

POL. CD.

11101 HIV
PARS
AUDITS

35
C 16)
	 rKuui
LEVEL 1 LEVEL
LOU UP LOU
-6
C -4)(
IBJ..LJ.1X .LJ.nj.T5 	
2 LEVEL 3
UP LOU UP
+ 9
+ 5)
LEVEL 4
LOU UP


                                                 (continued)
                                    F-14
-------
                            TABLE F-l  (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY   EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING SYSTEM

             COMPARISON REPORT OF 2ADHS ACCURACY  AUDITS £ PARS
DATE ' 1/17/86               DATA SELECTED FOR  YEAR 1985          PAGE NO.
REGION  04  STATE   01   ALABAMA
               REP  ORG   011   LAB  319001


I

I

POL. CD.

11101 HIV
PARS
12128 LEAD
PARS
AUJjT.TS

29
C 41)
12
( 22)
LEVE
LOW


-7
( -18H
L 1
UP


+ 5
+ 11)
	 fKUVl
LEVEL
LOW
-2
C -5)(
-12
( -6 ) (
2 LEVEL 3
UP LOW UP
•*-3
+8)
+ 2
+ 3)
LEVEL 4
LOW UP




REGION  04  STATE   01   ALABAMA
               REP  ORG   012  LAB  419001
LEVEL 1
LOW UP
	 rKUJOAfiJ.liJ.J
LEVEL 2
LOW UP
LI JjJ.nj.TS> 	
LEVEL 3
LOW UP
LEVEL 4
LOW UP
 POL. CD.    AUDITS
C42101 CO       12       -9    +9      -5    +5       -6    +10
   PARS      (   20)   (  -19M  +12)  C -16M +10)   (  -17M  +12)
111101 HIV      38
   PARS      ( 450)
   -6   +13
C   -4)(  +3)
112128 LEAD     12       -9    +6      -1    +2
   PARS      (   20)   (   -8)(   +1)  (  -2)(  +2)
                                                (continued)
                                   F-15
-------
                           TABLE F-l  (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING SYSTEM

            COMPARISON  REPORT OF 2ADHS ACCURACY  AUDITS C PARS
DATE 11/17/86
               DATA  SELECTED FOR YEAR 1985
                                           PAGE  NO.    15
REGION  01  STATE   01   ALABAMA
                                      REP ORG   013  LAB  319001

                          -PROBABILITY LIMITS	
 POL.CD.
AUDITS
 LEVEL 1
LOW    UP
 LEVEL 2
LOW    UP
 LEVEL 3
LOU    UP
 LEVEL 1
LOU    UP
             **  DATA  FOR COMPARISON WAS UNAVAILABLE **
REGION  04  STATE   01   ALABAMA
             AUDITS
111101 HIV      28
   PARS      (   11)
                                      REP  ORG   014  LAB  41S004

                          -PROBABILITY  LIMITS	
            LEVEL  1
           LOU     UP
                LEVEL 2
               LOW    UP

                -5    +6
             (   -2)(  +11)
                L£V£L 3
               LOW    UP
                LEVEL «*
               LOW    UP
                                                 (continued)
                                    F-16
-------
                             TABLE F-l (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  AGENCY
       EMSL  PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING  SYSTEM
             COMPARISON  REPORT OF 2ADHS  ACCURACY AUDITS  £  PARS
DATE  11/17/86
DATA SELECTED FOR YEAR  1985
PAGE NO.
16
REGION   04   STATE  01   ALABAMA
                       REP  ORG  015  LAB   419005
POL. CD.
111101 HIV
PARS
REGION 04
POL. CD.
142401 S02
PARS
142602 N02
PARS
111101 HIV
PARS
142401 S02
PARS
142602 N02
PARS
AUDITS
29
( 12)
STATE
AUDITS
5
( 6)
5
( 6)
29
( 16)
5
( 12)
5
( 7)
LEVEL
LOU

1
UP

10 FLORIDA
LEVEL
LOU
+ 12
( -34H
f -51 )(

+ 12
( -14M
( -3)(
1
UP
+ 12
+ 27)
+ 55)

+ 12
+ 12)
+ 3)
LEVEL
LOU
-4
f — 1 Q 5 f
_____1>T>AD
LEVEL
LOW
-13
+ 2
( -1 1)C
-7
( -10H
-13
+ 2
( -4)C
A JD J. JL< J. 1 I
2
UP
+ 5
+ 8)
ABILITY
2
UP
+ 27
+ 12) (
+ 2
•J-36) (
+ 9)
+ 27
+ 4) (
+ 2
+ 7) (
LEVEL 3
LOU UP

REP ORG 001
T XMTT 
-------
                           TABLE F-l  (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY
                       EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING SYSTEM
            COMPARISON REPORT OF 8ADHS  ACCURACY AUDITS £ PARS
DATE 11/17/86
                            DATA SELECTED  FOR  YEAR 1985
                                                      PAGE NO.
                                                       17
REGION  04  STATE   10   FLORIDA
 POL.CD.
AUDITS
111101 HIV      35
   PARS      (    9)
                                      REP  ORG   002  LAB  323003
LEVEL 1
LOW UP
	 i'KUBABJ.l.X J
LEVEL 2
LOW UP
LI LJ.nj.i5 	
LEVEL 3
LOU UP
LEVEL 4
LOU UP
                         -10   +17
                       (   -9M  +6)
REGION  04  STATE   10   FLORIDA
 POL.CD.
111101 HIV
   PARS
AUDITS
   31
   22)
 LEVEL 1
LOW    UP
                                      REP  ORG   003  LAB  323004

                          -PROBABILITY LIMITS	
 LEVEL 2
LOU    UP
 LEVEL 3
LOW    UP
 LEVEL 4
LOW    UP
                -5
             C   -8) (
       + 8
       +7)
                                                 (continued)
                                    F-18
-------
                           TABLE F-l  (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY  REPORTING SYSTEM

            COMPARISON  REPORT OF BADHS ACCURACY AUDITS  £ PARS
DATE 11/17/86               DATA SELECTED FOR YEAR  1985           PAGE NO.
                                                                 18
REGION  04  STATE   10   FLORIDA
                                      REP ORG  004  LAB   323008

                          -PROBABILITY LIMITS	
 POL.CD.
AUDITS
 LEVEI 1
LOW    UP
   LEVEL 2
  LOW    UP
 LEVEL 3
LOW    UP
IH2401 S02      5                    -13   +19       -4     -4
   PARS      (   6)   (  -16H  +27)  (  -5H +22)   (   +1)C  +18)

142401 S02      5                    -13   +19       -4     -4
   PARS      (   7)   (  -37)(  +42)  (  -5M +14)   (   -7) (  +13)
 LEVEL 4
LOW    UP
                                                       + 1
                                                       + 1
                                                  + 1
                                                  + 1
REGION  OH  STATE   10   FLORIDA
 POL.CD.
AUDITS
 LEVEL 1
LOW    UP
111101 HIV      33
   PARS      (   19)
                                      REP ORG  005   LAB   323002

                          -PROBABILITY LIMITS	
   LEVEL 2
  LOW    UP

   -7   +11
(   -7)(  +9)
 LEVEL 3
LOW    UP
 LEVEL 4
LOW    UP
                                                (continued)
                                   F-19
-------
                           TABLE F-l  (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY   EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING  SYSTEM
            COMPARISON REPORT OF 2ADHS ACCURACY AUDITS £ PARS
DATE 11/17/86
                DATA  SELECTED FOR YEAR  1985
                                                                   PAGE  NO.
                                                       19
REGION  04  STATE   10   FLORIDA
                                      REP  ORG   006  LAB  323006
POL. CD.

111101 HIV
PARS
AUDITS

35
( 14)
	 f KUBA0.LJL.J.TX ii-tH-LiZs 	
LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3
LOW UP LOW UP LOW UP
-6 +10
( -4)( +7)
LEVEL 4
LOW UP


REGION  04  STATE   10   FLORIDA
 POL.CD.
AUDITS
 LEVEL 1
LOW    UP
111101 HIV      27
   PARS      (   10)
                                      REP  ORG

                          -PROBABILITY LIMITS-
                                     007   LAB  323010
 LEVEL 2
LOW    UP
                                                     LEVEL 3
                                                    LOW    UP
                                                       LEVEL 4
                                                      LOW    UP
                          -3
                          -7)C
                      + 8)
                                                 (continued)
                                    F-20
-------
                           TABLE F-l  (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                       EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING SYSTEM
            COMPARISON REPORT OF CADHS ACCURACY  AUDITS £ PARS
DATE 11/17/86
               DATA  SELECTED FOR YEAR 1985
                                           PAGE NO.
                                                                              20
REGION  04  STATE   10   FLORIDA
 POL.CD.
AUDITS
 LEVEL 1
LOU    UP
111101 HIV      47
   PARS      (   75)
               LEVEL  2
              LOU     UP
               -5
             (  -6)(
                                +9
                                +9)
                                      REP ORG   011   LAB  423003
                 LEVEL  3
                LOU     UP
 LEVEL 4
LOU    UP
REGION  04  STATE   10   FLORIDA
 POL.CD.
AUDITS
 LEVEL 1
LOU    UP
111101 HIV      38
   PARS      (   76)
                                      REP ORG   012   LAB  423004

                          -PROBABILITY LIMITS	
   LEVEL 2
  LOU    UP

   -8   +16
(  -12)(  +7)
                              LEVEL 3
                             LOU    UP
 LEVEL 4
LOU    UP
                                                 (continued)
                                    F-21
-------
                           TABLE F-l (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY
                       EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING SYSTEM
             COMPARISON REPORT OF BADHS  ACCURACY AUDITS  £  PARS
DATE 11/17/86
                DATA  SELECTED FOR YEAR  1985
                                            PAGE NO.
                                         21
REGION  OH   STATE  10  FLORIDA
                                       REP  ORG  013  LAB   423016
POL. CD. AUDITS

C42

111

112


101 CO
PARS (
101 HIV
PARS (
128 LEAD
PARS (

9
19)
36
35)
12
12)
LEVEL 1
LOW UP
-2 +5
( -15M +11)


-15 +15
( -1 1)( +13)
LEVEL 2
LOW UP
-5 +1
( -10H +5)
-9 +17
( -4)( +1)
-2 +5
( -6)( +6)
LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4
LOW UP LOW UP
-5 +1
( -8)( +6)




REGION  04   STATE  10  FLORIDA
                                       REP ORG

                           -PROBABILITY LIMITS-
                                      014  LAB  423005
 POL.CD.
AUDITS
 LEVEL 1
LOW    UP
 LEVEL 2
LOW    UP
 LEVEL 3
LOW    UP
 LEVEL 4
LOW    UP
              ** DATA FOR COMPARISON WAS UNAVAILABLE  **
                                                 (continued)
                                    F-22
-------
                            TABLE F-l (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY
       EMSL  PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING SYSTEM
             COMPARISON REPORT OF 2ADHS  ACCURACY AUDITS  £  PARS
DATE 11/17/86
DATA SELECTED  FOR YEAR 1985
PAGE NO.
22
REGION  04   STATE  10  FLORIDA
                       REP ORG  015   LAB  423015
POL. CD.
•J\ i 10"! IJIV
PARS
REGION 04
POL. CD.
C42101 CO
PARS
111101 HIV
PARS
AUDITS
26
( 6)
STATE
AUDITS
3
( 6)
31
( 16)
LEVEL 1
LOU UP

10 FLORIDA
LEVEL 1
LOU UP
-7 -7
( -20H +21)

	 JT.KUJB
LEVEL
LOU
-10
( -5H

LEVEL
LOU
-9
( -13M
-5
C -7)(
AJSJ.JjJ.lJ
2
UP
+ 9
+ 2)
ABILITY
2
UP
-9
+ 10) (
+ 8
+ 5)
juj.no.ia 	
LEVEL 3
LOU UP

REP ORG 016
LEVEL 3
LOU UP
-12) ( +8)

LEVEL 4
LOU UP

LAB 423008
LEVEL 4
LOU UP


                                                 (continued)
                                   F-23
-------
                            TABLE F-l (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY
                       EflSL PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING SYSTEM
             COMPARISON REPORT OF  BADHS ACCURACY AUDITS  C PARS
DATE 11/17/86
                DATA SELECTED FOR  YEAR 1985
                                            PAGE NO.
                                           23
REGION  04   STATE  10  FLORIDA
 POL.CD,
AUDITS
 LEVEL  1
LOU     UP
111101 HIV      38
   PARS      (   14)
                                       REP ORG  017   LAB  423001

                           -PROBABILITY LIMITS	
   LEVEL 2
  LOU    UP

   -9   +16
(   -4)(  +7)
 LEVEL 3
LOU    UP
 LEVEL 4
LOU    UP
REGION   04   STATE  10  FLORIDA
 POL.CD
J.'JDITS
 LEV El-  1
LOU     UP
111101 HIV      31
   PARS      (   74)
                                       REP ORG   018   LAB  423002

                           -PROBABILITY LIMITS	
   LSVEi 2
  LOU    UI>

   -8   +11
(  -7X +14)
 LEVEL  3
LOU     UP
 LEVEL  4
                                                  (continued)
                                    F-24
-------
                            TABLE F-l (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY
       EMSL  PRECISION/ACCURACY  REPORTING SYSTEM
             COMPARISON REPORT  OF  BADHS ACCURACY AUDITS  £ PARS
DATE 11x17/86
DATA SELECTED  FOR YEAR 1985
PAGE NO.
REGION  04   STATE  11  GEORGIA
                       REP ORG   010  LAB  321001
POL. CD.

C42101 CO
PARS
142602 N02
PARS
111101 HIV
PARS
112128 LEAD
PARS
AUDITS

£
( 6)
5
( 4)
30
( 48)
12
( 11)
LEVEL
LOU
-7
( -30M

( -5)C


-6
( -6) (
1
UP
-6
-6)

-1)


+ 10
+ 5)
	 rKvai
LEVEL
LOU
-6
( -12M
+ 7
( -12M
-5
( -7)(
-6
( -5) (
ICXliJ.
2
UP
-2
+ 3)
+ 7
+ 8)
+ 8
+ 8)
+ 4
+ 3)
ii jjj.nj.ia
LEVEL
LOU
-3
( -7)(
-5
( -19M




3
UP
+ 2
+ 5)
+ 6
+ 12)




LEVEL 4
LOU UP








REGIOH   04   STATE  18  KENTUCKY
                       REP ORG   001  LAB  316001
 POL.CD.     AUDITS
LEVEL 1
LOW UT
	 rKUBABXJjJ.:
LEVEL 2
LOW UP
LI iij.nj.i£> 	
LEVEL 3
LOW UP
LEVEL 4
LOW UP
   ilOi HIV      43
   PARS      C  183)
          -•21    +33
        (   -6X  -M2)
                                                 (continued)
                                    F-25
-------
                           TABLE F-l  (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY
       EMSL  PRECISION/ACCURACY  REPORTING SYSTEM
             COMPARISON REPORT OF  BADHS ACCURACY AUDITS  £  PARS
DATE 11/17/86
DATA SELECTED  FOR YEAR 1985
PAGE NO.
25
REGION  04   STATE  18  KENTUCKY
                       REP ORG   002   LAB  416001
POL. CD. AUDITS

C42

111

112


101 CO
PARS (
101 HIV
PARS (
128 LEAD
PARS (

12
5)
32
17)
12
12)
LEVEL 1
LOW UP
-9 +0
( -17H +6)


-4 +12
( -3)( +4)
LEVEL 2
LOW UP
-5 +7
( -9)( +7)
-8 +13
C -11M +27)
-11 +11
( -4)( +4)
LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4
LOW UP LOW UP
-3 +7
( -7)( +5)




REGION  04   STATE  25  MISSISSIPPI
                       REP ORG   100  LAB  322001
POL. CD.

C42101 CO
PARS
!121'S LEAD
PARS
AUDITS

3
( 4)
6
( 24)
LEVEL
LOW
+ 3
( -8)(
-13
( -4)(
1
UP
+ 3
+ 4)
+ 10
+ 5)
LEVEL
LOW
+ 2
( -4)(
-14
( -3) (
2 LEVEL 3
UP LOW UP
+ 2
+ 0) ( -11H +4)
-6
+ 4)
LEVEL 4
LOW UP




                                                  (continued)
                                    F-26
-------
                            TABLE F-l (Continued)
ENVIRONMEKTAL PROTECTION  AGENCY
       EMSL  PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING  SYSTEM
             COMPARISON  REPORT OF BADHS  ACCURACY AUDITS  £  PARS
DATE  11/17/86
DATA SELECTED FOR YEAR  1985
                                                                    PAGE NO.
2€
REGION   04   STATE  34  NORTH CAROLINA
                       REP  ORG  001  LAB   318001
POL. CD.
C42101 CO
PARS
111101 HIV
PARS
REGION 04
POL. CD.
C42101 CO
PARK
111101 HIV
PARS
AUDITS
12
( 18)
84
( 202)
STATE
AUDITS
6
( 3)
31
( 17)
LEVEL
LOW
-3
( -8K

34 NORTH
LEVEL
LOW
+ 0
( -6)C *

1
UP
+ 4
+ 6)

~"~"~"JrjtUUA
LEVEL
LOW
-5
C -« )(
-9 +
( -6)(
8J.li
2
UP
+ 2
+ 6)
19
+ 6)
CAROLINA
•••»•,••_ »%****.»•»»»»•»•»
1
UP
+ 4
13)

LEVEL
LOW
+ 0
-8 +
DXJj
2
UP
+ 5
+ 8)
12
+ 4)
                                                      LEVEL  3
                                                     LOW     UP

                                                      -4     +0
                                                      -5M   +5)
                                        LEVEL  4
                                       LOW     UP
                                                    REP ORG   002  LAB  418003
                                                      LEVEL  3
                                                     LOW     UP
                                                      "5
                                + 8
                                + 6)
                                        LEVEL  4
                                       LOW     UP
                                                 (continued)
                                    F-27
-------
                            TABLE F-l (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
       EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING  SYSTEM
            COMPARISON REPORT OF BADHS  ACCURACY AUDITS £ PARS
DATE 11/17/86
DATA SELECTED  FOR  YEAR 1985
PAGE NO.
REGION  04  STATE   34  NORTH CAROLINA
                       REP ORG  003   LAB   418006
POL. CD.

C42101 CO
PARS
111101 HIV
PARS
AUDITS

15
( 23)
41
( 24)
LEVEL
LOU
-4
( -7)(


1
UP
+ 4
+ 6)


	 fK.ua
LEVEL
LOU
+ 0
( -2)(
-5
( -2)C
A a j. ii x i
2
UP
+ 1
+ 6)
+ 10
+ 10)
i jjj.nj.id-
LEVEL
LOU
-1
( -1)(


3
UP
+ 1
+ 4)


LEVEL 4
LOU UP




REGION  04   STATE  34  NORTH CAROLINA
                       REP ORG  004   LAB  418008
POL. CD.

111101 HIV
PARS
AUDITS LEVEL 1
LOU UP
31
( 8)
LEVEL
LOU
-3
( -3) (
iBXijj.ii iixnxia 	
2 LEVEL 3
UP LOU UP
+ 2
+ 6)
LEVEL 4
LOU UP


                                                 (continued)
                                    F-28
-------
                            TABLE F-l (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY
       EMSL  PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING SYSTEM
             COMPARISON REPORT OF CADHS  ACCURACY AUDITS £  PARS
DATE 11/17/86
DATA SELECTED  FOR YEAR 1985
PAGE NO.
28
REGION  04   STATE  42  SOUTH CAROLINA
                       REP ORG   001   LAB  320001
POL. CD.
C42101 CO
PARS
111101 HIV
PARS
112128 LEAD
PARS
REGION 04
POL. CD.
111101 HIV
PARS
AUDITS
9
( 52)
31
( 253)
12
STATE
AUDITS
31
( 207)
LEVEL
LOU
-1
( -18M +

-5
( -24M +
44 TENNES
LEVEL
LOU

1
UP
13)

+ 9
12)
SEE
1
UP

LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4
LOU UP LOU UP LOU UP
-3 +6 -1 +0
( -11)( +7) ( -10M +5)
-8 +12
C -4)( +5)
-6 +5
( -10M +12)
REP ORG 001 LAB 317001
LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4
LOU UP LOU UP LOU UP
-8 +13
f -5)( +11)
                                                 (continued)
                                    F-29
-------
                            TABLE F-l (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY   EKSL PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING  SYSTEM
             COMPARISON REPORT OF BADHS  ACCURACY AUDITS £ PARS
DATE 11/17/86               DATA SELECTED  FOR  YEAR 1985
                                                                  PAGE  NO.
                                                       29
RSGIOH  04  STATE   44  TENNESSEE
 POL. CD.
            AUDITS
 LEVEL 1
LOU    UP
111101 HIV      31
   PARS      (   90)
                                                   REP ORG  002  LAB   417004
 	PROBABILITY

   LEVEL 2
  LOU    UP
                                                     LEVEL 3
                                                    LOU    UP
                                      -4
                      + 6
                      + 4)
                                                                   LEVEL  4
                                                                  LOU     UP
REGION  04  STATE   44  TENNESSEE
 POL.CD.
111101 HIV
   PARS
            AUDITS
                41
                90)
 LEVEL 1
LOU    UP
                                                   REP ORG  003  LAB   417003

                                       -PROBABILITY LIMITS	
   LEVEL 2
  LOU    UP

   -6   +14
(   -3)C  +4)
 LEVEL 3
LOU    UP
                                                                   LEVEL  4
                                                                  LOU     UP
                                                 (continued)
                                    F-30
-------
                           TABLE  F-l (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY
                       EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY  REPORTING SYSTEM
            COMPARISON REPORT OF 2ADHS ACCURACY AUDITS £ PARS
DATE 11/17/86
                DATA SELECTED FOR YEAR  1985
                                            PAGE NO.
                                         30
REGION  04  STATE   44  TENNESSEE
                                      REP  ORG   004  LAB  417002
POL. CD.

111101 HIV
PARS
AUDITS

30
( 18)
LEVEL 1 LEVEL
LOU UP LOW
-6
( -11X
2 LEVEL 3
UP LOU UP
+ 9
+ S)
LEVEL 4
LOW UP


REGION  04  STATE   44   TENNESSEE
 POL.CD.
                                      REP ORG

                          -PROBABILITY LIMITS-
                                     OC5   LAB   417001
AUDITS
 LEVEL 1
LOW    UP
 LEVEL 2
LOU    UP
 LEVEL 3
LOU    UP
 LEVEL 4
LOW    UP
             **  DATA  FOR COMPARISON WAS UNAVAILABLE **
                                                 (continued)
                                    F-31
-------
                           TABLE F-l (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY   EMSL  PRECISION/ACCURACY  REPORTING SYSTEM

            COMPARISON REPORT OF BADHS  ACCURACY AUDITS £ PARS
BflTE 11/17/36               DATA SELECTED FOR YEAX 1985           PAGE NO.
REGION
 POL. CD..
            SXA1K   *»«*  TEHHZSSEE
             AUDITS
 LEVEL 1
LOU    UP
111101 HIV      37
   PARS      (   '48)
                            REP ORG   006  LAB  417001
                                       -PROBABILITY
 LEVEL 2
LOU    UP
 LEVEL 3
LOU    UP
 LEVEL 4
LOU    UP
                                       -u
                                             +7
                                             + 8)
REGION  05   STATE  It  ILLINOIS
 POL.CD.
111 <^ KXV
             AUDITS
                89)
 LEVEL  1
LOU     UP
                                                   REP  ORG   001  LAB  328001

                                       •PROBABILITY LIMITS	
 LEVEL 2
LOU    UP

 -7   -M2
 -5M +10)
 LEVEL ?
LOW    UP
 LEVEL  t
LOU     UP
                                                  (continued)
                                    F-32
-------
                           TABLE F-l (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY
                       EMSL PRECISIONXACCURACY REPORTING SYSTEM
            COMPARISON REPORT OF 2ADHS ACCURACY AUDITS £ PARS
DATE 11/17/86
                DATA SELECTED FOR YEAR  1985
                                            PAGE NO.
                                         32
REGION  05  STATE   11  ILLINOIS
POL. CD.

112128 LEAD
PARS
112602 N02
PARS
AUDITS

6
( 12)
5
( 23)
LEVEL 1
LOU UP
-2 +11
C -3)( +1)

( -6)( +6)
	 rKUB
LEVEL
LOU
-7
( -3H
+ 2
( -2) (
fi.OJ.liJ
2
UP
+ 20
+ 1)
+ 2
+ 1)
.11 iij.nj.ra-
LEVEL
LOU


-5
C -2)(
3
UP


+6
+5)
LEVEL 1
LOU UP




REGION  05  STATE   11   ILLINOIS
                                      REP  ORG

                          -PROBABILITY LIMITS-
                                     003   LAB  128001
 POL.CD.
AUDITS
 LEVEL 1
LOU    UP
 LEVEL 2
LOU    UP
 LEVEL 3
LOU    UP
 LEVEL 4
LOU    UP
             **  DATA  FOR COMPARISON UAS UNAVAILABLE **
                                                 (continued)
                                    F-33
-------
                           TABLE  F-l (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                                  EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING  SYSTEM
            COMPARISON  REPORT OF 2ADHS ACCURACY AUDITS  £  PARS
DATE 11X17/86
                           DATA SELECTED FOR YEAR 1985
                                                                  PAGE NO.
REGION  05  STATE   15   INDIANA
                                                 REP ORG   001   LAB  329001

                                     -PROBABILITY LIMITS	
POL.CD.    AUDITS      LEVEL  1        LEVEL 2       LEVEL  3
                      LOU     UP     LOU    UP     LOU     UP
C42101 CO       6      -12     -3      +0    +7
   l-ARS     (   14)   (  -21M   +4)

111101 HIV      33                     -5    +8
   PARS     (   28)                 (  -6)(  +4)

112128 LEAD     12      -11    +15     -15    + 7
   PARS     (   28)   (  -12)(   +5)   ( -13)(  +6)
                                                    + 3
                                                        +11
                                      -7)C +11)   (  -5)(  +12)
                                                                   LEVEL H
                                                                  LOU    UP
REGION  05  STATE   15   INDIANA
                                                 REP ORG   002   LAB  429002
POL. CD.

C42101 CO
PARS
111101 HIV
PARS
AUDITS LEVEL 1
LOU UP
3
( 12) ( -13)( +11)
35
( 34)
	 rilUBJ
LEVEL
LOU
+ 4
( -9)(
-7
( -4)(
ICJ.X.X
2
UP
+ 4
+ 9)
+ 7
+ 6)
ii iij.nxi£>-
LEVEL
LOU
+ 5
( -10)C


3
UP
+ 5
+ 8)


LEVEL 4
LOU UP




                                    F-34
                                                 (continued)
-------
                          TABLE F-l  (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                       EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING SYSTEM
            COMPARISON REPORT OF BADHS ACCURACY AUDITS  £  PARS
DATE 11/17/86               DATA SELECTED FOR YEAR  1985
                                                      PAGE NO.
                                                       34
REGION  05  STATE   15   INDIANA
                                      REP ORG   003   LAB  429007
 POL.CD.
AUDITS
111101 HIV      31
   PARS      (   28)
LEVEL 1
LOW UP


LEVEL
LOU
-4
C -5H
2 LEVEL 3
UP LOW UP
+ 5
+ 4)
LEVEL 4
LOW UP


REGION  05  STATE   15   INDIANA
 POL.CD.
AUDITS
 LEVEL 1
LOW    UP
111101 HIV     37
   PARS      (  36)
                                      REP ORG  005   LAB   429005

                          -PROBABILITY LIMITS	
 LEVEL 2
LOU    UP

 -4    +6
 -3H  +3)
 LEVEL 3
LOU    UP
 LEVEL 4
LOW    UP
                                                (continued)
                                   F-35
-------
                            TABLE F-l (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING SYSTEM
            COMPARISON REPORT OF 2ADHS ACCURACY  AUDITS £ PARS
DATE 11/17/86               DATA SELECTED FOR  YEAR 1985
                                                      PAGE NO.
                                                       35
REGION  05  STATE   15   INDIANA
                                      REP ORG   008  LAB  429004
POL. CD.

C42101 CO
PARS
111101 HIV
PARS
AUDITS


(

(

9
11)
32
19)
LEVEL
LOU
-6
( -7M


1
UP
-2
+ 6)


	 fKUBJ
LEVEL
LOU
-5
( -5K
-5
( -3) (
IBJ.LJ.
2
UP
+ 3
+5)
+ 6
+ 6)
xx iij.nj.xs-
LEVEL
LOU
-4
( -6)(


3
UP
+ 5
+ 6)


LEVEL 4
LOU UP




REGION  05  STATE   15   INDIANA
                                      REP  ORG   009  LAB  429008

                          -PROBABILITY LIMITS	
 POL. CD.
AUDITS
 L^VEL 1
LCU    UP
 LEVEL 2
LOU    UP
 LEVEL 3
LOU    UP
                                                                   LEVEL  4
                                                                  LOU     UP
             ** DATA  FOR COMPARISON HAS UNAVAILABLE **
                                                 (continued)
                                    F-36
-------
                           TABLE F-l (Continued)
              PROTECTION AGENCY   EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING SYSTEM
            COMPARISON REPORT OF SADHS ACCURACY  AUDITS £ PARS
DATS 11/17/86
               DATA SELECTED FOR YEAR 1985
                                                                  PAGE NO.
                                                       36
REGION  05  STATE   15   INDIANA
 POL.CD.    AUDITS
                                      REP ORG  010   LAB  429001
LEVEL 1
LOU UP
	 FKUBABJ..LXJ
LEVEL 2
LOU UP
LI ifj.n±xa 	
LEVEL 3
LOU UP
LEVEL 1
LOU UP
             **  DATA  FOR COMPARISON UAS UNAVAILABLE **
REGION  05  STATE   15  INDIANA
                                      REP ORG

                          -PROBABILITY LIMITS-
                                     100  LAB   329002
 POL.CD.
AUDITS
 LEVEL 1
LOU    UP
 LEVEL 2
LOU    UP
 LEVEL 3
LOU    UP
 LEVEL 4
LOU    UP
              **  DATA FOR COMPARISON UAS  UNAVAILABLE **
                                                 (continued)
                                    F-37
-------
                            TABLE F-l (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY    EMSL PRECISIONXACCURACY REPORTING  SYSTEM
             COMPARISON REPORT  OF  BADHS ACCURACY  AUDITS £ PARS
DATE 11/17/86
                            DATA  SELECTED FOR YEAR  1985
PARTS KO.
REGION  05   STATE  23  MICHIGAN
POL. CD.
C42101 CO
PARS
111101 HIV
PARS
112133 LEAD
PARS
REGION 05
POL. CD.
111101 HIV
PARS
AUDITS
9
( 8)
( 59)
12
( 26)
STATE
AUDITS
35
C 15)
LEVEL
LOW
-9
( -11H

-17
( -11H
1
UP
+ 4
+ 10)

-4
+ 5)
23 MICHIGAN
LEVEL
LOW

1
UP

	 f KUBJ
LEVEL
LOW
-2
C -5M
-24

LEVEL
LOW
-7
C -10)(
iaxjjj.ii
2
UP
+ 2
+7) (
+ 4
+5)
-4
+ 3)
IBILITY
2
UP
+ 9
+ 9)
LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4
LOW UP LOW UP
+ 0 +1
-12 )( +7)


REP ORG 002 LAB 426001
T TUT1?1 ^*
LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4
LOW UP LOW UP

                                                  (continued)
                                    F-38
-------
                            TABLE  F-l  (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
       EMSL  PRECISION/ACCURACY  REPORTING SYSTEM
             COMPARISON REPORT  OF fiADHS ACCURACY  AUDITS £ PARS
DATE 11/17/86
DATA SELECTED  FOR YEAR 1985
PAGE NO.
38
REGION  05   STATE  2'4  MINNESOTA
                       REP ORG   001   LAB  324001
POL. CD

C42101 CO
PARS
111101 HIV
PARS
112120 T..KAB
PARS
AUDITS

9
( 16)
33
( 65)
12
( 11)
LEVEL
LOU
-20
( -15H


-3
( -8) (
1
UP
+ 16
+ 13)


+ 15
+ 12)
	 rxuDi
LEVEL
LOU
+ 1
( -4)(
-7
( -4)(
+ 1
( -4) (
IBJ.JL..L
2
UP
+ 3
+7)
+ 8
+ 5)
+ 4
+ 6)
ii iiJ-nxra 	
LEVEL 3
LOU UP
+ 1 +2
( -5)( +4)




LEVEL 4
LOU UP






REGION  05   STATE  36  OHIO
                       REP ORG   001   LAB  327001
 POL.CD.
112128 LEAD
   PARS
AUDITS

12
( 15)
LEVEL 1
LOU UP
-47 +21
( -9)( +5)
LEVEL
LOU
-6
( -9) (
2 LEVEL 3
UP LOU UP
+ 1
+ 4)
LEVEL 4
LOU UP


                                                 (continued)
                                    F-39
-------
                           TABLE F-l  (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  AGENCY   EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY  REPORTING SYSTEM

            COMPARISON  REPORT OF BADHS ACCURACY AUDITS £ PARS
DATE 11/17/86               DATA SELECTED FOR YEAR  1985           PAGE NO.   39
REGION  05  STATE   36   OHIO
 POL.CD.
AUDITS
 LEVEL 1
LOU    UP
111101 HIV     36
   PARS     (   6)
                                      REP ORG  002  LAB   327003

                          -PROBABILITY LIMITS	
   LEVEL 2
  LOU    UP

   -7    +9
C  -13M +10)
 LEVEL 3
LOU    UP
                                                                   LEVEL 4
                                                                  LOU    UP
REGION  05  STATE   36   OHIO
 POL.cr
AU3ITS
111101 HIV      32
   PARS      (   19)
 LE"SL 1
LOU    UP
                                      REP ORG  003  LAB   327005

                          -PROBABILITY LIMITS	
   LEVEL 2
  LOU    UP

   -H    +5
( -14H  +6)
 LEVEL 3
LOU    UP
 LEVEL 4
LOU    UP
                                                 (continued)
                                    F-40
-------
                           TABLE F-l (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY  REPORTING SYSTEM
            COMPARISON  REPORT OF BADHS ACCURACY AUDITS  £  PARS
DATE 11/17/86
               DATA SELECTED  FOR YEAR 1985
                                                                  PAGE NO.
REGION  05  STATE   36   OHIO
 POL.CD.
AUDITS
 LEVEL 1
LOU    UP
111101 HIV      29
   PARS      (   21)
                                      REP ORG  001  LAB   327007

                          -PROBABILITY LIMITS	
   LEVEL 2
  LOU    UP
                          -4
                      + 6
                      +7)
 LEVEL 3
LOU    UP
 LEVEL 4
LOU    UP
REGION  05  STATE   36   OHIO
 POL.CD.
AUDITS
 LEVEL 1
LOU    UP
111101 HIV      34
   PARS      (   10)
                                      REP ORG  005  LAB   327006

                          -PROBABILITY LIMITS	
   LEVEL 2
  LOU    UP

   -5    +5
(  -10)( +12)
 LEVEL 3
LOU    UP
 LEVEL 4
LOU    UP
                                                (continued)
                                   F-41
-------
                            TABLE F-l (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY   EMSL PRECISIONXACCURACY REPORTING  SYSTEM
            COMPARISON REPORT OF 2ADHS ACCURACY AUDITS £ PARS
DATE 11/17/86               DATA SELECTED  FOR  YEAR 1985
                               PAGE NO.
REGION  05  STATE   36  OHIO
               REP ORG   006   LAB  427001
POL. CD.
C42101 CO
PARS
111101 HIV
PARS
REGION 05
POL. CD.
AUDITS
5
( 5)
45
( 17)
STATE
AUDITS
LEVEL 1
LOU UP
+ 1 +1
( -11H +14)

36 OHIO
LEVEL 1
LOU UP
	 PKUB/
LEVEL
LOU
-10
-5
C -2)(
»» « f\ « i
LEVEL
LOU
lBJ.i.J.1 X
2
UP
+7
+8) C
+ 6
+ 3)
1 B T T T 1* V
lOXliJL 1 I
2
UP
LEVEL
LOU
+ 2
-2)C

REP ORG
LEVEL
LOU
3
UP
+ 3
+ 8)

007
3
UP
LEVEL 4
LOU UP


LAB 427002
LEVEL 4
LOU UP
111101  HIV      39
   PARS     (   14)
   -3    +3
(  -4)( +10)
                                                 (continued)
                                    F-42
-------
                           TABLE F-l  (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                       EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING SYSTEM
            COMPARISON REPORT OF BADHS ACCURACY  AUDITS £ PARS
DATE 11/17/86
               DATA  SELECTED FOR YEAR 1985
                                           PAGE  NO.
REGION  05  STATE   36   OHIO
 POL.CD.
AUDITS
111101 HIV     51
   PARS      (  34)
                                      REP ORG   008   LAB  427003
LEVEL 1
LOU UP
	 rKUBABJ.li.LJ
LEVEL 2
LOU UP
LI i,j.nxi£> 	
LEVEL 3
LOU UP
LEVEL 4
LOU UP
                         -15   +13
                       (  -12H  +8)
REGION  05  STATE   36   OHIO
 POL.CD.
AUDITS
 LEVEL 1
LOU    UP
                                      REP ORG

                          -PROBABILITY LIMITS-
                                     009  LAB   427004
 LEVEL 2
LOU    UP
 LEVEL 3
LOU    UP
 LEVEL 4
LOU    UP
             **  DATA  FOR COMPARISON UAS UNAVAILABLE **
                                                (continued)
                                   F-43
-------
                           TABLE F-l (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  AGENCY   EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY  REPORTING SYSTEM
            COMPARISON  REPORT OF 2ADHS ACCURACY AUDITS £  PARS
DATE 11/17/86
               DATA SELECTED FOR YEAR 1985
                                                                  PAGE NO.
REGION  05  STATE   36   OHIO
 POL. CD.
AUDITS
                        LEVEL 1
                       LOU    UP
111101 HIV     28
   PARS     (  28)
                                      REP ORG  010   LAB   427005

                          -PROBABILITY LIMITS	
 LEVEL 2
LOU    UP
                                      -5
                                + 6
                                + 6)
 LEVEL 3
LOU    UP
 LEVEL 4
LOU    UP
REGION  05  STATE   36   OHIO
                                      REP ORG  012   LAB   427007
POL. CD.

C42101 CO
PARS
111101 HIV
PARS
AUDITS

3
( 5)
37
( 'iU>
LEVEL
LOU
-14
( -4)(


1
UP
-14
+ 18)


	 r*tu0j
LEVEL
LOU
-3
( +0)(
-11
C -12M
\OJilMj.
2
UP
-3
+5)
+ 6
+ 5)
ii iij.nj.ia>-
LEVEL
LOU
-1
( -5)(


3
UP
-1
+ 6)


LEVEL 4
LOU UP




                                    F-44
                                                 (continued)
-------
                           TABLE F-l (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING  SYSTEM
            COMPARISON  REPORT OF CADHS ACCURACY AUDITS £ PARS
PATE 11/17/86
               DATA  SELECTED FOR YEAR 1985
                                                                  PAGE  NO.
                                                      44
REGION  05  STATE   36   OHIO
 POL.CD.
AUDITS
111101 HIV     33
   PARS     (  18)
                                      REP ORG  013  LAB  427010
LEVEL 1
LOU UP
	 rKUCABJ-ltJ-j
LEVEL 2
LOU UP
LI JjJ.nj.TS 	
LEVEL 3
LOU UP
LEVEL 4
LOU UP
                          -6     +9
                       (  -14H  +11)
REGION  05  STATE  36   OHIO
 POL.CD.
AUDITS
 LEVEL 1
LOU    UP
111101 HIV     31
   PARS     (  12)
                                      REP ORG  014  LAB  427008

                          •PROBABILITY LIMITS	
   LEVEL 2
  LOU    UP

  -19   +18
( -16K  +2)
                                                    LEVEL 3
                                                   LOU    UP
                                                      LEVEL 4
                                                     LOU    UP
                                               (continued)
                                   F-45
-------
                            TABLE F-l (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY
       EMSL  PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING SYSTEM
             COMPARISON REPORT OF fiADHS  ACCURACY AUDITS £  PARS
DATE 11/17/86
DATA SELECTED  FOR YEAR 1985
PAGE NO.
45
REGION  05   STATE  36  OHIO
                       REP ORG  015   LAB  427009
POL. CD.
C42101 CO
PARS
111101 HIV
PARS
REGION 05
POL. CD.
C42101 CO
PARS
111101 HIV
PARS
AUDITS LEVEL 1
LOU UP
6 -18 +11
( 4) ( -11M •»•!>
37
( 17)
STATE 36 OHIO
AUDITS LEVEL 1
LON UP
3
( 6) ( -5)( +4)
36
( 18)
	 fKUB
LEVEL
LOU
-8
( ~S)C
-4
( -10M
_ m, .OL T> T> A 1>
LEVEL
LOU
-1
C -3)C
-2
( -7)C
A0J.Jj.Li i
2
UP
+5
+ 1} C
+7
+ 8)
ft 11 TT TT V
AoXiiJLI X
2
UP
-1
+5) (
+ 4
+ 10)
ixniia 	
LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4
LOW UP LOU UP
+ 0 +4
-3)( +2)

REP ORG 016 LAB 427012
LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4
LOU UP LOU UP
-4)( +3)

                                                 (continued)
                                    F-46
-------
                            TABLE  F-l (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY    EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING SYSTEM

             COMPARISON REPORT  OF  CADHS ACCURACY AUDITS £ PARS
DATE  11/17/86              DATA SELECTED FOR YEAR  1985          PAGE NO.
REGION   05   STATE  51  WISCONSIN
                                       REP ORG  001   LAB  325001
POL. CD.

C42101 CO
PARS
111101 HIV
PARS
112128 LEAD
PARS
AUDITS

3
( 10)
48
( 84)
12
( 24>
LEVEL
LOU
+ 2
( -11K


-6
( -7) (
1
UP
+2
+ 21)


+ 15
+ 8)
	 rxu&A
LEVEL
LOU
+ 1
( -6)(
-7
( -6)(
-10 +
( -2) (
BJ.JJX.IX jjj.nj.rs 	
2 LEVEL 3
UP LOU UP
+ 1
+9) ( -4)( +5)
+ 8
+ 6)
15
+ 5)
LEVEL 4
LOU UP






REGION  06   STATS  O't  AHKAMSS.S
                                       REP OEG  001  LAB   332001

                           -PROBABILITY LIMITS	
 POL.CD.
AUDITS
 LEVEL  1
LOU     UP
 LEVEL 2
LOU    UP
                                                     LEVEL  3
                                                    LOU     UP
              **  DATA FOR COMPARISON  HAS UNAVAILABLE **
                                                        LEVEL 4
                                                      LOU     UP
                                                 (continued)
                                   F-47
-------
                            TABLE F-l (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING SYSTEM
            COMPARISON REPORT OF 2ADHS ACCURACY  AUDITS £ PARS
DATE 11/17/86
                DATA  SELECTED FOR YEAR  1985
                                            PAGE  NO.
                                          47
REGION  06  STATE   04  ARKANSAS
 POL.CD.
AUDITS
111101 HIV      32
   PARS      (  116)
                                      REP ORG   002  LAB  332001
LEVEL 1
LOW UP
•' 	 rKUBABJ.ii.LJ
LEVEL 2
LOU UP
LI jjj.no. is 	
LEVEL 3
LOU UP
LEVEL 4
LOW UP
                         -10   +15
                       (   -6H  +6)
REGION  06  STATE   19  LOUISIANA
 POL.C").
I V I 1C1 HIV
   PAPS
AUDITS
(  28)
 LEVEL 1
LOU    UP
                                      REP  ORG   001  LAB  334001

                          •PROBABILITY LIMITS	
   LEVEL 2
  LOU    UP

  -16   -H8
(   -7)(  +9)
 LEVEL 3
LOU    UP
 LEVEL 4
LOU    UP
                                                 (continued)
                                    F-48
-------
                            TABLE F-l (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                       EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY  REPORTING SYSTEM
            COMPARISON REPORT OF 2ADHS ACCURACY  AUDITS £ PARS
DATE 11/17/86
               DATA  SKLF-CTED FOR YEAR 1985
                                            PAGE  NO.
REGION  06  STATE   32   NEW MEXICO
                                      REP ORG   001   LAB  330001
POL. CD.

C42101 CO
PARS
111101 HIV
PARS
112128 LEAD
PARS
AUDITS

9
( 12)
30
( 155)
12
( 20)
LEVEL
LOU
-18
( -7 ) (


-1
{ -8) (
1
UP
+ 14
+ 11)


+7
+ 6)
	 f KUB
LEVEL
LOU
-16
C -6)C
-14
( -7)(
-8
( -5H
ABJ.ii J.
2
UP
+8
+7)
+ 20
+7)
+7
+7)
ii iij.nj.ra 	
LEVEL 3
LOU UP
-16 +10
C -7)C +7)




LEVEL 4
LOU UP






REGION  06   STATE   32  NEU MEXICO
                                      REP  ORG   002  LAB  330001

                          -PROBABILITY LIMITS	
 POL.CD.
AUDITS
 LEVEL 1
LCU    UP
 LEVEL 2
LOU    UP
 LEVEL 3
LOU    UP
 LEVEL 4
LOU    UP
              **  DATA FOR COMPARISON UAS  UNAVAILABLE **
                                                 (continued)
                                   F-49
-------
                           TABLE F-l  (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING SYSTEM
            COMPARISON REPORT OF 2ADHS ACCURACY  AUDITS £ PARS
DATE 11/17/86
               DATA SELECTED  FOR YEAR 1985
                                           PAGE NO.
REGION  06  STATE   37   OKLAHOMA
 POL.CD.    AUDITS
                                      REP ORG  101   LAB   331001
LKVEL 1
LCiAj UP
	 fKOBAKJ.LJ.-J
LEVEL 2
LOU UP
rx LJ.nj.rs 	
LEVEL 3
LOU UP
LEVEL 4
LOU UP
              **  DATA FOR COMPARISON UAS  UNAVAILABLE **
REGION   06   STATE  37  OKLAHOMA
 POL.CD.
AUDITS
 LEVEL 1
LOU    UP
111101 HIV      38
   PARS      (   21)
                                      REP ORG   102   LAB  431001

                          -PROBABILITY LIMITS	
 LEVEL 2
LOU    UP

 -6    + 9
 -5)(  +6)
 LEVEL 3
LOU    UP
 LEVEL H
LOU    UP
                                                  (continued)
                                     F-50
-------
                           TABLE F-l (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING SYSTEM

            COMPARISON REPORT OF 2ADHS ACCURACY  AUDITS  £ PARS
DATE 11/17/86               DATA SELECTED FOR YEAR  1985           PAGE NO.   50
REGION  06  STATE   37   OKLAHOMA                   REP  ORG   103  LAB  431002

                       	PROBABILITY LIMITS	

 POL.CD.    AUDITS      LEVEL 1        LEVEL 2        LEVEL  3       LEVEL 4
                       LOU    UP     LOU    UP      LOU    UP     LOU    UP

             ** DATA FOR COMPARISON UAS UNAVAILABLE **



REGION  06  STATE   45   TEXAS                      REP  ORG   001  LAB  333001

                       	PROBABILITY LIMITS	

 POL.CD     AUDITS      LEVEL 1        LEVEL 2        LEVEL  3       LEVEL 4
                       LOU    UP     LOW"    UP      LCM    UP     LOW    UP

111101 HIV     36                     -6    +8
   PARS     ( 460)                 (  -8)(  +7)
                                                (continued)

                                   F-51
-------
                           TABLE F-l (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                       EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING SYSTEM
            COMPARISON REPORT OF BADHS ACCURACY  AUDITS £ PARS
DATE 11/17/86
               DATA  SELECTED FOR YEAR 1985
                                           PAGE  NO.
                                          51
REGION  06  STATE   45   TEXAS
 POL.CD!
AUDITS
 LEVEL 1
LOU    UP
111101 HIV      36
   PARS      (  131)
                                      REP ORG   002   LAB  433002

                          -PROBABILITY LIMITS	•	
   LEVEL 2
  LOU    UP
 LEVEL 3
LOU    UP
                          -4
                      + 6
                      + 5)
 LEVEL 4
LOU    UP
REGION  06  STATE   45  TEXAS
 POL.CD.
AUDITS
 LEVEL  1
LOU     UP
111101 HIV      43
   PARS      (   86)
                                      REP ORG   003  LAB  433001

                          -PROBABILITY LIMITS	
   LEVEL 2
  LOU    UP

   -6    +9
(   -6)( +10)
 LEVEL 3
LOU    UP
 LEVEL 4
LOU    UP
                                                  (continued)
                                     F-52
-------
                           TABLE F-l  (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY   EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING  SYSTEM
            COMPARISON REPOUT OF 2ADHS ACCURACY AUDITS £ PARS
DATE 11/17/86
               DATA  SELECTED FOR YEAR  1985
                                                                  PAGE  NO.
                                                       52
REGION  06  STATE   45  TEXAS
 POL.CD.    AUDITS
                                      REP ORG   001  LAB  4B300'4
LEVEL 1
LOU UP
	 VK.UBABJ.liJ.1
LEVEL 2
LOU UP
LI iixnj-ia 	
LEVEL 3
LOU UP
LEVEL 4
LOU UP
              **  DATA FOR COMPARISON UAS  UNAVAILABLE **
REGION  06   STATE   45  TEXAS
 POL.CD.
                                      REP  ORG   005  LAB  433005

                          -PROBABILITY LIMITS	
AUDITS
 LEVEL 1
LOU    UP
 LEVEL 2
LOU    UP
 LEVEL 3
LOU    UP
 LEVEL 4
LOU    UP
111101 HIV      37
   PARS      (   45)
                          -5
                      + 9
                      +8)
                                                 (continued)
                                    F-53
-------
                            TABLE F-l (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY
                       EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING SYSTEM
             COMPARISON REPORT OF BADHS  ACCURACY AUDITS £ PARS
DATE 11/17/86
               DATA  SELECTED FOR YEAR  1985
PAGE NO.
53
REGION  06   STATE  45  TEXAS
                                      REP  ORG  006  LAB  433008
POL. CD.

C42101 CO
PftRS
111101 HIV
PARS
112128 LEAD
PARS
AUDITS

£
( 8)
33
C 68)
12
( 18)
LEVEL 1
LOU UP
— 4 + '!
( -11)( +10)


-5 +21
( -12)( +11)
LEVEL
LOU
-2
( -6)C
-3
( -8K
-37
( -6) (
2 LEVEL 3
UP LOU UP
-2 -5 -1
+ 4) ( -4X +3)
+ 3
+ 9)
+ 32
+ 3)
LEVEL 4
LOU UP






REGION   06   STATE
 POL.CD.
AUDITS
TEXAS
LEVEL 1
LOW UP

LEVEL 2
LOU UP
REP ORG 007
LEVEL 3
LOU UP
LAB 43301
LEVEL 4
LOU UP
              ** DATA FOR COMPARISON  WAS UNAVAILABLE **
                                                  (continued)
                                     F-54
-------
                           TABLE F-l (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY   EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING SYSTEM

             COMPARISON REPORT OF BADHS ACCURACY  AUDITS £ PARS
DATE  11/17/86               DATA SELECTED FOR  YEAR 1985          PAGE NO.
REGION  07   STATE   16  IOWA
                                      REP ORG   001   LAB  136001
 POL.CD.
AUDITS
 LEVEL 1
LOU    UP
111101 HIV      36
   PARS      (   16)
                LEVEL 2
               LOU     UP
                                                     LEVEL 3
                                                    LOU    UP
                                                       LEVEL 1
                                                      LOU    UP
               -17
                               +20
                                +5)
REGION  07  STATE   16   IOWA
 POL.CD.
AUDITS
 LEVEL 1
LOW    UP
Till 01 KIV     33
   PARS     (  22)
                                      REP ORG  002   LAB   136002

                          •PROBABILITY LIMITS	
               LEVEL  2
              LOW     UP
                                                     LEVEL  3
                                                    LOW     UP
                                                       LEVEL 1
                                                      LOW    UP
                          -8
                          -9K   -M)
                                                (continued)
                                   F-55
-------
                           TABLE F-l  (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  AGENCY   EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING SYSTEM

            COMPARISON  REPORT  OF fiADHS ACCURACY AUDITS £ PARS
DATE 11/17/86               DATA SELECTED FOR YEAR 1985           PAGE NO.
REGION  07  STATE   16   IOWA
                                                  REP ORG   003   LAB   336001
roi.cn .

£42101 CO
PARS
111101 HIV
PARS
112128 LEAD
PARS
AUDITS


(

(

(

3
3)
31
51)
12
12)
LEVEL
LOU
-10
( -22X


-13
( -5H
1
UP
-10
+ 3)


+ 11
+ 1)
	 PKUJS
LEVEL
LOU
-3
( -8)(
-3
( -9)(
-15
( -6) (
ABJ.LXTX LiniTS 	
2 LEVEL 3
UP LOU UP
-3 -2 -2
-1) ( -3)( +1)
+ 2
+ 17)
+ 12
+ 2)
LEVEL 4
LOU UP






REGION  07  STATE   17  KANSAS
                                                  REP ORG   001   LAB  337001
 POL. CD.
C42101 CO
   PARS

111131 HIV
   F<S
            AUDITS
LLVEL 1
LOU UP
	 fKUBABJ.JjJLJ
LEVEL 2
LOU UP
rr LJ.ru.xs 	
LEVEL 3
LOU UP
LEVEL 4
LOU UP
                3      -33    -33
                5)   (  -20)(  +34!

               35
            (  22)
112128 LEAD     12       -3     +8
   PARS     (   24)   (  -13)(  +11)
  -21   -21     -15   -15
(   -7i( +11)  (  -7)(  +9)

  -15   +21
(  -20M t-20)

   -8    +4
(  -11)C  -2)
                                                (continued)
                                   F-56
-------
                           TABLE F-l  (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING SYSTEM
            COMPARISON REPORT OF 2ADHS ACCURACY  AUDITS £ PARS
DATE 11/17/86
               DATA SELECTED  FOR YEAR 1985
                                                                  PAGE NO.
56
REGION  07  STATE   26   MISSOURI
                                      REP ORG  001   LAB   338001
POL. CD.

C42101 CO
PARS
111101 HIV
PARS
112128 LEAD
FiUS
AUDITS

6
( 6)
34
( 19)
12
( 12)
LEVEL
LOU
+ 2
( -6)(


-13
( -11M
1
UP
+ 3
+ 16)


+ 6
+ 1)
	 PKUB
LEVEL
LOU
+ 2
( -9)(
-12
( -19H
-9
( -9)(
ABJ.JjJ.TI l.J.nj.1^ 	
2 LEVEL 3
UP LOU UP
+2 -4 +8
+ 15) ( -17H +18)
+ 21
+ 23)
-1
-3)
LEVEL 4
LOU UP






REGION  07  STATE   26   MISSOURI
                                      REP ORG   002   LAB  438004
 POL.CD.
AUDITS
LEVEL 1
LOU UP
	 F KUBABJ.LJ.J
LEVEL 2
LOU UP
LI iij.nj.it> 	
LEVEL 3
LOU UP
LEVEL 4
LOU UP
111101 HIV      31
   PARS      (   11)
                          -i»    +2
                       (  -12M +10)
                                                 (continued)
                                   F-57
-------
                            TABLE F-l (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING SYSTEM

            COMPARISON REPORT OF 2ADHS ACCURACY AUDITS  £  PARS
DATE 11/17/86               DATA SELECTED FOR YEAR  1985           PAGE NO.   57
REGION  07  STATE   26   MISSOURI                  REP  ORG   003  LAB  438003

                       	PROBABILITY  LIMITS	

 POL.CD.    AUDITS      LEVEL 1        LEVEL 2        LEVEL  3       LEVEL 4
                       LOU    UP     LOU    UP      LOU    UP     LOU    UP

             ** DATA FOR COMPARISON WAS UNAVAILABLE **
REGION  07  STATE   26   MISSOURI                  REP  ORG   004  LAB  438006

                                                    LIMITS	
 POL.CD.    AUDITS      LEVEL 1        LEVEL 2        LEVEL  3       LEVEL 4
                       LOU    UP     LOU    UP      LOU     UP     LOU    UP

C42101 CO        9      -10   +10      -5    +4       -3     +3
   PARS     (    6)   (  -10H   +8)  ( -10M  +6)   (  -11M   +2)
                                                 (continued)
                                   F-58
-------
                           TABLE F-l  (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY
                       EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING SYSTEM
            COMPARISON REPORT OF BADHS ACCURACY AUDITS £ PARS
DATE 11/17/86
                DATA SELECTED FOR YEAR  1985
                                            PAGE NO.
                                         58
REGION  07  STATE   26  MISSOURI
 POL.CD.
AUDITS
 LEVEL  1
LOU     UP
111101 HIV      38
   PARS      (   13)
 LEVEL 2
LOU    UP
                          -H
                      + 3
                      + 3)
                                      REP  ORG   005  LAB  438005
 LEVEL 3
LOU    UP
 LEVEL tj
LOU    UP
REGION  07  STATE   28  NEBRASKA
 POL.CD.
AUDITS
 LEVEL 1
LGN    UP
                                      REP  ORG   001   LAB  335001

                          -PROBABILITY LIMITS	
 LEVEL 2
I, CM    UP
 LEVEL 3
LOU    UP
 LEVEL t
LOU    UP
             ** DATA  FOR COMPARISON UAS UNAVAILABLE **
                                                 (continued)
                                    F-59
-------
                           TABLE F-l (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                       EWSL  PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING  SXSTEM
            COMPARISON  REPORT OF 2ADHS ACCURACY AUDITS  £  PARS
DATE 11/17/86
               DATA  SELECTED FOR YEAR 1985
                                                                  PAGE NO.
                                                       59
REGION  07  STATE   28   NEBRASKA
 POL.CD.
AUDITS
 LEVEL 1
LOU    UP
111101 HIV      39
   PARS      (    6)
                                      REP ORG  002   LAB   335001

                          -PROBABILITY LIMITS	
 LEVEL 2
LOU    UP

 -8   +11
 -5H  +5)
 LEVEL 3
LOU    UP
 LEVEL 4
LOU    UP
REGION  07   STATE   28  NEBRASKA
 POL.CD.
AUDITS
 LEVEL  1
LOU     UP
                                      REP ORG   003   LAB  435002

                          -PROBABILITY LIMITS	
 LEVEL 2
LOU    UP
 LEVEL 3
LOU    UP
 LEVEL  4
LOU     UP
              **  DATA FOR COMPARISON HAS UNAVAILABLE **
                                                 (continued)
                                    F-60
-------
                           TABLE F-l  (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY  REPORTING SYSTEM

            COMPARISON  REPORT 07 2ADHS ACCURACY AUDITS  £ PARS
DATE 11/17/86               DATA SELECTED FOR YEAR  1985           PAGE NO.   60
        CO  STATE   Of.   COLORADO                  REP ORS   001   LAB  344001
 POL.CD.    AUDITS      LEVEL 1        LEVEL 2       LEVEL  3        LEVEL 4
                       LOU    UP     LOU    UP     LOU     UP      LOU    UP

C42101 CO       18      -24    +4      -8    +1      -7     +5
   PARS     (   29)   (  -12K  +20)   (  -7) ( +12)  (  -6)( +10)   (  -25H +15)
REGION  08  STATE   27   MONTANA                   REP ORG   001   LAB  339001

                       	PROBABILITY LIMITS	

 POL.CD.    AUDITS      LEVEL 1       LEVEL 2       LEVEL  3       LEVEL 4
                       LOU     UP     LOU    UP     LOU     UP      LOU    UP

             ** DATA FOR COMPARISON HAS UNAVAILABLE **
                                                (continued)
                                   F-61
-------
                            TABLE F-l (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY    EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY  REPORTING SYSTEM
             COMPARISON REPORT OF 2ADHS ACCURACY AUDITS  £  PARS
DATE 11/17/86
DATA SELECTED  FOR YEAR 1985
PAGE NO.
61
REGION  08   STATE  27  MONTANA
                       REP ORG   002   LAB  439001
POL. CD.

111101 HIV
PARS
FvZSIGH 08
POL. CD.

CH2101 CO
PARS
111101 HIV
PARS
AUDITS

27
( 9)
STATE
AUDITS

3
( 7)
28
( 12)
LEVEL 1
LOU UP


27 MONTANA
LEVEL 1
LOU UP
+ 1 +1
( -15H +19)


	 V KUB
LEVEL
LOU
-5
( -10)C
AUj.ijj.ii jjj.nj.xa 	
2 LEVEL 3
UP LOU UP
+7
+ 9)
REP ORG 003
LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3
LOU

( -9M
-2
( -4)(
UP LOU UP

+12) ( -5)( +8)
+ 1
+ 5)
LEVEL 
-------
                           TABLE F-l  (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY  REPORTING SYSTEM

            COMPARISON  REPORT OF 2ADHS ACCURACY AUDITS  £ PARS
DATE 11/17/36               DATA SELECTED FOR YEAR  1985           PAGE NO.   62
REGION  08  STATE   27   MONTANA                   REP  ORG   004  LAB  439003

                                                    LIMITS	
 POL.CD.    AUDITS      LEVEL 1        LEVEL 2        LEVEL  3        LEVEL 4
                       LOU    UP     LOU    UP      LOU     UP     LOU    UP

111101 HIV     27                    -20   +17
   PARS     (  26)                 (  -8H  +5)
REGION  08  STATE   35   NORTH DAKOTA              REP  ORG   001   LAB  341001

                       	PROBABILITY  LIMITS—	

 POL.CD.    AUDITS      LEVEL 1       LEVEL 2        LEVEL  3       LEVEL 4
                       LOW    UP     LOU    UP      LOW    UP     LOU    UP

111101 HIV      30                     -7    +5
   VA2S     (20)                 (  -4H  +5)
                                                (continued)

                                   F-63
-------
                            TABLE F-l (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING  SYSTEM
            COMPARISON REPORT OF BADHS ACCURACY AUDITS £ PARS
DATE 11/17/86
               DATA SELECTED FOR YEAR 1985
                                                                   PAGE NO.
                                                 63
REGION  08  STATE   43  SOUTH DAKOTA
POL. CD.
111101 HIV
PARS
REGION 08
POL. CD.
C42101 CO
PASS
111101 HIV
PARS
AUDITS
30
( 113)
STATE 46
AUDITS
15
( 24) (
39
( 66)
LEVEL 1
LOW UP

UTAH
LEVEL 1
LOU UP
-8 +13
-9H +12)

	 fKUBAUJLLJ-i I
LEVEL 2
LOU UP
-7 +5
( -3)( +3)

LEVEL 2
LOU UP
-12 +23
( -4H +5) (
-3 +4
( -8)( + 6)
LXHJ.XS 	 	 	
LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4
LOU UP LOU UP

REP ORG 001 LAB 340001
V VM Yffl««
LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4
LOU UP LOU UP
-9 +20
-4)( +5)

112128 LEAD
   PARS
          -23
+ 15
-38
+ 17
(   10)  (  -7H +14)   (  -16M +10)
                                                 (continued)
                                    F-64
-------
                           TABLE F-l  (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  AGENCY    EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING  SYSTEM
            COMPARISON  REPORT  OF  2ADHS ACCURACY AUDITS £ PARS
DATE 11/17/86
               DATA SELECTED  FOR  YEAR 1985
                                                                 PAGE  NO.
REGION  OS  STATE   52  WYOMING
 POL.CD.
AUDITS
        LEVEL 1
       LOU    UP
111101 HIV     34
   PARS      (  20)
                                      RE? ORG  001  LAB  343001

                          -PROBABILITY LIMITS	
   LEVEL 2
  LOU    UP

  -10   +13
(   -7H  +4)
                                                    LEVEL 3
                                                   LOU    UP
              LEVEL 4
             LOU    UP
REGION  09  STATE   03   ARIZONA
 POL. CD.
AUDITS
C42101 CO
   PARS

111101 HIV
   PARS

112128 LEAD
   PARS
 G)

33
18)

12
        LEVEL 1
       LOU    UP
                        -6
                 -4
                                      REP ORG  100  LAB  347001

                          -PROBABILITY LIMITS	:-
   LEVEL 2
  LOU    UP
                      -3
         +0
                              +8
                28)   (   -7H   +1)
                          -7
         + 2
         + 3)
                                                    LEVEL 3
                                                   LOU    UP
              LEVEL  4
             LOU     UP
                        -3H   +6)   (   -9)( +11)  (

                                     -16   +25
                                   (  -17M +13)
-1    -1
-6H  +8)  {  -9H  +11)
                                                 (continued)
                                    F-65
-------
                           TABLE F-l (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                       EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING  SYSTEM
            COMPARISON REPORT OF 2ADHS ACCURACY  AUDITS  £ PARS
DATE 11/17/86
               DATA  SELECTED FOR YEAR 1985
                                           PAGE NO.
                                          65
REGION  09  STATE   03   ARIZONA
 POL.CD.
AUDITS
111101 HIV      38
   PARS      (   55)
                                      REP ORG   200   LAB  447001
LEVEL 1
LON UP
	 rKU.BA.BJ.JLiJ. j
LEVEL 2
LOU UP
LI iij.nj.j.a 	
LEVEL 3
LOW UP
LEVEL U
LOU UP
                          -7   +13
                       (  -10K +13)
REGION  Q9  STATE   03   ARIZONA
 POL.CD.
AUDITS
 LEVEL 1
LOU    UP
111101 HIV      31
   PARS      (   12)
                                      REP ORG   300   LAB  447002

                          -PROBABILITY LIMITS	
   LEVEL 2
  LOW    UP

  -18   +26
(  -14M +13)
 LEVEL 3
LOU    UP
 LEVEL H
LOU    UP
                                                 (continued)
                                    F-66
-------
                           TABLE F-l  (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING SYSTEM
            COMPARISON REPORT OF BADHS ACCURACY  AUDITS £ PARS
DATE 11/17/86
               DATA  SELECTED FOR YEAR 1985
                                                                  PAGE NO.
                                                       66
REGION  09  STATE   05   CALIFORNIA
                                      REP ORG   001   LAB  315001
 POL.CD.
C42101 CO
   PARS
AUDITS
112128 LEAD     12
   PARS      (   32)
LEVEL 1
LOW UP
	 JTKUBAB.Llj.LJ
LEVEL 2
LOW UP
LI juj.ri.Lr:> 	
LEVEL 3
LOW UP
LEVEL 4
LOW UP
          -18
      -18
 -4
                                            -4
 + 1
(  33)  (  -9)(  +14)   (   -8)(  +9)  C  -8)(  +7)

          -32    +25
               -8    +11
             ( -14M   +9)
REGION  09  STATE   05   CALIFORNIA
 POL.CD.
111101 HIV
   PARS
AUDITS
   30
   40)
 LEVEL 1
LOui    UP
                                      REP ORG   004   LAB  445001

                          -PROBABILITY LIMITS	
 LEVEL 2
LOW    UP

 -3    +4
 -7)(  +6)
 LEVEL 3
LOW    UP
 LEVEL 4
LOW    UP
                                                 (continued)
                                    F-67
-------
                           TABLE F-l (Continued)
       KEM-JAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                       EMSL  PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING SYSTEM
            COMPARISON REPORT OF 2ADHS ACCURACY  AUDITS £ PARS
DATE 11/17/86
               DAT?, SSLSCTEtt FCH YEAR "385
                                           PAGE  NO.
                                          67
REGION  09  STATE   05   CALIFORNIA
                                      REP ORG   036   LAB  445003
POL. CD.

C42101 CO
PARS
111101 HIV
PARS
AUDITS

11
( 8)
35
( 10)
LEVEL
LOU
+ 4
( -5)(


1
UP
+ 9
+ 8)


	 rKUBfl.BJ.li J.T
LEVEL 2
LOU UP
+ 2 +7
( -2)( +7)
-22 +21
( -3)C +9)
i jj.tnxid 	
LEVEL 3
LOU UP
+ 1 +5
( -3)( +5)


LEVEL 4
LOU UP




REGION  09  STATE   05  CALIFORNIA
 POL.CD.
111101 HIV
   PARS
AUDITS
   29
(  37)
 LEVEL 1
LOU    UP
                                      REP ORG   061   LAB  445002

                          -PROBABILITY LIMITS	
   LEVEL 2
  LOU    UP

  -22   +31
(  -11H  +6)
 LEVEL 3
LOU    UP
 LEVEL 4
LOU    UP
                                                 (continued)
                                    F-68
-------
                           TABLE F-l  (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  AGENCY   EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY  REPORTING SYSTEM

            COMPARISON  REPORT OF BADHS ACCURACY AUDITS  £ PARS
DATE 11/17/86               DATA SELECTED FOR YEAR  1985           PAGE NO.   68
REGION  09  STATE   12   HAWAII                    REP ORG   120   LAB  348001

                       	PROBABILITY LIMITS	

 POL.CD.    AUDITS      LEVEL 1        LEVEL 2       LEVEL  3        LEVEL 4
                       LOW     UP     LOW    UP     LOW     UP      LOW    UP

             ** DATA FOR COMPARISON WAS UNAVAILABLE **



REGION  09  STATE   29   NEVADA                    REP ORG   100   LAB  346001

                       	PROBABILITY LIMITS	

 POL.CD.    AUDITS      LEVEL 1        LEVEL 2       LEVEL  3        LEVEL 4
                       LOW     UP     LOW    UP     LOW     UP      LOW    UP

             ** DATA FOR COMPARISON WAS UNAVAILABLE **
                                                (continued)

                                   F-69
-------
                           TABLE F-l (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY  REPORTING SYSTEM

            COMPARISON  REPORT OF 2ADHS ACCURACY AUDITS  £ PARS
DATE 11/17/86               DATA SELECTED FOR YEAR  1985           PAGE NO.
                                                                             69
REGION  09  STATE   29   NEVADA
                                                  REP  ORG   300  LAB  446002

                                       -PROBABILITY LIMITS	
 POL.CT).
            AUDITS
 LEVEL 1
LOU    UP
 LEVEL 2
LOU    UP
 LEVEL 3
LOU    UP
 LEVEL 4
LOU    UP
             ** DATA  FOR COMPARISON WAS UNAVAILABLE  **
REGION  10  STATE   02   ALASKA
                                                   REP  ORG   020  LAB  351001
 POL.CD.
            AUDITS
111101 HIV      32
   PARS      (    8)

112128 LEAD     12
   PARS      C    9)
LEVEL 1
LOU UP
	 Jf KUSABJ. iiJ. J
LEVEL 2
LOW UP
LI Jjxnj-ia 	
LEVEL 3
LOU UP
LEVEL 4
LOU UP
                                      -7    +7
                                   C  -5H  +4)

                       -19   +12     -10   +11
                        -2)( +10)  C -11M +15)
                                                 (continued)
                                    F-70
-------
                           TABLE F-l  (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY
       EMSL  PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING SYSTEM
             COMPARISON REPORT OF 2ADHS  ACCURACY AUDITS £ PARS
DATE 11/17/86
DATA SELECTED  FOR YEAR 1985
PAGE NO.
70
REGION   10   STATE  13  IDAHO
                       REP ORG  001   LAB  354001
POL. CD. AUDITS

C42

111

112


101 CO
PARS (
101 HIV
PARS (
128 LEAD
PADS (

3
8)
30
74)
12
12)
LEVEL 1
LOU
-4
( -8)(


-7
( -13)(
UP
-4
+ 1)


+ 4
+ 14)
	 jrjHU.BABJL.bJL i ;i JUJLnjL12> 	
LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4
LOU
-3
( -8)(
-2
( -6M
-9
( -14M
UP LOU UP LOU UP
-3 -4 -4
+1) ( -7)( +3)
+ 2
+ 10)
+ 1
+ 9)
REGION   10   STATE  38  OREGON
                       REP ORG  001   LAB  353001
POL .ri>. /.'JDITS

C42

111

112


101 CO
PARS (
101 HIV
PARS (
128 LEAD
PARS (

21
H9)
37
318)
12
12)
l-r.VZ'L 1
LOU
-7
( -16 K


-7
( -1H
UP
+ 4
+•15)


+ 9
+8)
	 rKUBABJLJUJLU I JUJLnjLld 	
LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4
LON UP LOW >JF LOW UP
-? +1 ~1 +0
( -9)C +7) ( -8)( +5)
-6 +7
( -4)( +5)
11 +10
C -DC +8)
                                                 (continued)
                                    F-71
-------
                           TABLE F-l (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL P'OTSCTIOtf AGZ.NCY   EHSL PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING SYSTEM

            COMPARISON REPORT OF 2ADHS ACCURACY  AUDITS £ PARS
DATE 11/17/86               DATA SELECTED FOR YEAR  1985          PAGE NO.    71
REGION  10  STATE   49   WASHINGTON                 REP ORG  001  LAB  352001

                       	PROBABILITY LIMITS	

 POL.CD.    AUDITS      LEVEL 1       LEVEL  2        LEVEL 3       LEVEL  1
                       LOU    UP     LOU     UP      LOU    UP     LOU     UP

111101 HIV      57                    -15     +9
   PARS     (   H9)                 ( -11M +12)
                                                 (continued)

                                    F-72
-------
                           TABLE F-l (Continued)

                  EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING SYSTEM

             COMPARISON REPORT OF QADHS ACCURACY AUDITS & PARS
                        DATA SELECTED FOR YEAR 1985

                              REGIONAL SUMMARY
REGION
        AUDITS
POL. CD.  142401  S02
03   PA
     PARS

04   PA
           5
          24

          10
POL. CD. 142602
04
05
PA
PARS

PA
PARS
10
17

 5
23
POL. CD. C42101  CO
01


02


03


04


05


06
     PA
     PARS

     PA
     PARS

     PA
     PARS

     PA
     PARS

     PA
     PARS

     PA
     PARS
          15
          25

          36
         104

          78
          80

          87
         161

          56
          91

          15
          20
              LEVEL 1
             LOW     UP
             -31
             -12

              -2
  0
-30

  2
 -6
              -3
              "™O

              -2
             -10

             -15
             -10

              -8
             -17

             -14
             -15

             -14
              -9
         4
         8

        18
                                     3
                                    30

                                     2
                                     6
         9
        10

         2
        11

         8
         9

         6
        12

         8
        13

        11
        11
no 11.1 1 i
LEVEL
LOW
3
_y
-12
0
-14
1
-2
-1
-5
-1
-6
-14
-9
-6
-10
-5
-7
-12
-6
1 L. 1 1'l 1 1 O
2
UP
7
8
28
8
23
5
4
6
5
5
8
7
5
5
8
6
8
6
6
LEVEL
LOW
3
-8
-2
-2
-21
-2
-2
-3
-5
0
-5
-13
-9
-5
-9
-3
-7
-13
-6
3
UP
3
7
11
4
29
6
5
6
6
7
6
8
7
5
7
7
8
7
6
                                                                 (continued)
                                    F-73
-------
REGION
                           TABLE F-l (Continued)

                  EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING SYSTEM

             COMPARISON REPORT OF QADHS ACCURACY AUDITS & PARS
                        DATA SELECTED FOR YEAR 1985

                              REGIONAL SUMMARY
        AUDITS
POL. CD. C42101  CO
07


08


09


10
PA
PARS

PA
PARS

PA
PARS

PA
PARS
  21
  20

  36
  60

  20
  49

  24
  57
POL. CD. 111101  HIV
01


02


03


04


05


06
PA
PARS

PA
PARS

PA
PARS

PA
PARS

PA
PARS

PA
PARS
 166
 355

 102
 203

 458
 427

1056
2105

 827
 681

 319
1110
LEVEL 1
LOW UP
-30 19
-17 20
-21 13
-11 17
-19 17
-8 12
-7 4
-16 14












LEVEL
LOW
-18
-10
-14
-6
-6
-7
-3
-9
_y
-9
-11
-4
-7
-9
-9
-7
-7
-8
-9
-8
[ l_ It'll 1 O
2
UP
12
10
15
10
9
9
1
6
6
7
18
7
8
9
13
8
9
8
12
7
LEVEL 3
LOW UP
-13 10
-12 10
-10 14
-5 8
-2 5
-7 7
-3 1
-8 5












                                                                (continued)
                                    F-74
-------
                           TABLE F-l (Continued)

                  EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING SYSTEM

             COMPARISON REPORT OF QADHS ACCURACY AUDITS & PARS
                        DATA SELECTED FOR YEAR 1985

                              REGIONAL SUMMARY

                            	PROBABILITY LIMITS-
REGION
AUDITS
POL. CD. 111101  HIV
 LEVEL 1
LOW     UP
 LEVEL 2
LOW
                                                       UP
07
08
09
10
POL.
01
02
03
04
05
06
PA
PARS
PA
PARS
PA
PARS
PA
PARS
CD.
PA
PARS
PA
PARS
PA
PARS
PA
PARS
PA
PARS
PA
PARS
277
160
215
266
196
172
156
449
112128 LEAD
48
95
36
61
72
191
78
125
66
116
24
38





-12
-14
-14
-9
-20
-11
-9
-14
-24
-10
— O
-10





17
12
17
12
17
8
10
10
21
7
16
9
-11
-13
-9
-6
-16
-11
-10
-6

-12
-9
-10
-6
-10
-9
-10
-6
-18
-9
-26
-6
14
15
9
5
22
10
8
7

5
8
11
9
5
4
7
6
13
6
23
6
 LEVEL 3
LOW     UP
                                    F-75
                                                                (continued)
-------
                           TABLE F-l (Continued)

                  EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING SYSTEM

             COMPARISON REPORT OF QADHS ACCURACY AUDITS & PARS
                        DATA SELECTED FOR YEAR 1985

                              REGIONAL SUMMARY

                            	PROBABILITY LIMITS-
REGION
       AUDITS
POL. CD. 112128  LEAD
07


08


09


10
PA
PARS

PA
PARS

PA
PARS

PA
PARS
36
48

12
10

24
60

36
33
              LEVEL 1
             LOW
-11
-12

-23
 -7

 -7
 -7

-12
 -7
                                    UP
10
 7

15
14

 8
 1

11
12
                    LEVEL 2
                   LOW
-12
-11

-38
-16

 -9
-11

-11
-10
                                                 UP
 6
 0

17
10

 8
 7

 8
12
                              LEVEL 3
                             LOW     UP
                                                                 (continued)
                                     F-76
-------
              TABLE F-l (Continued)

     EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING SYSTEM

COMPARISON REPORT OF QADHS ACCURACY AUDITS & PARS
           DATA SELECTED FOR YEAR 1985

                 NATIONAL AVERAGES
POL. CD.

C42101 CO
PA
PARS
111101 HIV
PA
PARS
112128 LEAD
PA
PARS
142401 SO?
PA
PARS
142602 N02
PA
PARS
AUDITS


388
667

3772
5928

432
777

15
55

15
40
LEVEL
LOW

-14
-13




-16
-12

-24
-21

0
-20
1
UP

10
13




16
9

25
20

3
20
•rr\UDHDiui i i
LEVEL
LOW

-10
-8

-10
-8

-15
9

-9
-10

0
-10
1 L. J.1'11 1 -3
2
UP

9
8

12
8

10
7

22
12

7
15
LEVEL
LOW

-8
-8







-1
-10

-2
-14
3
UP

9
7







9
11

4
19
                       F-77
-------
            TABLE F-2.  PARS AND  PA DATA FOR S02  CONTINUOUS MONITORS
ENVI&OKKEXTAL  PROTECTION AGSHCY
                                   ZKSi  PRECISION/ACCURACY  REPORTING SYSTEM
             COMPARISON REPORT OF  2ADHS ACCURACY AUDITS  £  PARS
DATE 11/17/86
                            DATA SELECTED FOR YEAR 1985
                                                      PAGE NO.
REGION  01   STATE  07  COKNSCTICUI
 POL. CD.
C42401 S02
   PARS
            AUDITS
           LEVEL  1
          LOU     UP
    H      -7
(   19)  (  -7H
                              -7
                                                   REP ORS   001   LAB  306001

                                       -PROBABILITY LIMITS	
   LEVEL 2
  LOU    UP

   -3    -1
(   -s)(  +H:
 LEVEL 3
LOU    UP
                                                  C  -6)(   + 2)
 LEVEL *»
LOU    UP
REGION   01   STATE  20  MAINE
                                                   REP ORG   001  LAB  301001
POL. CD. AUDITS LEVEL 1

C42401 S02
PARS (
LOU UP
8 +1 +2
9) ( -UH +7)
	 PROBABX1.J.
LEVEL 2
LOU UP
-6 +1
( -6)( +5)
TI Linj.i& 	
LEVEL 3 LEVEL 1
LOU UP LOU UP
-6 +0
( -5M +3)
                                                 (continued)
                                    F-78
-------
                           TABLE  F-2 (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING SYSTEM
            COMPARISON REPORT OF 2ADHS ACCURACY  AUDITS £ PARS
DATE 11/17/86
                DATA  SELECTED FOR YEAR 1985
                                           PAGE NO.
REGIOK  01  STATE   22   MASSACHUSETTS
 POL.CD.
                                      REP ORG

                          -PROBABILITY LIMITS-
                                     001  LAB   304001
AUDITS
 LEVEL 1
LOU    UP
 LEVEL 2
LOU    UP
 LEVEL 3
LOU    UP
             ** DATA  FOR COMPARISON UAS UNAVAILABLE  **
 LEVEL t
LOU    UP
REGION  01  STATE   30   NEU HAMPSHIRE
                                      REP ORG   001   LAB  302001
 POL.CD.
C42401 S02
                                       -PROBABILITY  LIMITS-
AUDITS
 LEVEL 1
LOU    UP
 LEVEL 2
LOU    UP
 LEVEL 3
LOU    UP
 LEVEL 1
LOU    UP
   12      -6
(  27)  ( -11H
                              +7)
                -2     + t      +0    +«*
             ( -10K   +8)   (   -9M +10)
                                                 (continued)
                                   F-79
-------
                           TABLE F-2 (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY  REPORTING SYSTEM

            COMPARISON  REPORT OF SADHS ACCURACY AUDITS  £ PARS
DATE 11/17/86               DATA SELECTED FOR YEAR  1985           PAGE NO.
REGION  01  STATE   41   RHODE ISLAND              REP  ORG   001  LAB  305001

                       	PROBABILITY LIMITS	

 POL.CD.    AUDITS      LEVEL 1        LEVEL 2        LEVEL  3       LEVEL 4
                       LOU    UP     LOU    UP     LOU    UP     LOU    UP

             ** DATA  FOR COMPARISON UAS UNAVAILABLE **



REGION  01  STATE   47   VERMONT                    REP  ORG   001  LAB  303001

                       	PROBABILITY LIMITS	

 POL.CD.    AUDITS      LEVEL 1        LEVEL 2        LEVEL  3       LEVEL «*
                       LOU    UP     LOU    UP     LOU    UP     LOU    UP

             ** P»?A  FOX COMPARISON UAS UNAVAILABLE **
                                                 (continued)

                                    F-80
-------
                            TABLE F-2 (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
       EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING  SYSTEM
            COMPARISON REPORT OF SADHS ACCURACY  AUDITS £ PARS
DATE 11/17/86
DATA SELECTED FOR  YEAR 1985
PAGE NO.
REGION  02  STATE   31   NEW JERSEY
                       REP ORG  001  LAB   308001
POI.CD. AUDITS

C42401 S02 8
PARS ( 47)
LEVEL 1
LOU UP
-1 +3
( -13K +12)
LEVEL 2
LOU UP
+ 0 +2
( -10X +10)
LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4
LOU UP LOU UP
+ 0 +2

REGION  02  STATE   33   NEU YORK
                       REP ORG  001  LAB   307001
POL. CD.

C42401 S02
PARS
AUDITS

4
( 173)
LEVEL
LOU
+ 4
( -11H H
1
UP
+ 4
H4)
	 rKUBABXl.J.
LEVEL 2
LOU UP
+ 4 +5
( -10H +12)
ii i.j.nj.ia
LEVEL
LOU
+ 4
( -10)(
3
UP
+ 4
+ 12)
LEVEL 4
LOU UP


                                                 (continued)
                                    F-81
-------
                           TABLE F-2  (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING SYSTEM
            COMPARISON REPORT OF BADHS ACCURACY  AUDITS  £ PARS
DATE 11/17/86
               DATA  SELECTED FOR YEAR 1985
                                                                  PAGE NO.
REGION  02  STATE   40   PUERTO RICO
 POL.CD.
C42401 S02
   PARS
LEVEL 1
LOU UP
	 rilU.BABJ.li.LJ
LEVEL 2
LOU UP
LI jjj.nj.jL:> 	
LEVEL 3
LOU UP
LEVEL 4
LOU UP
AUDITS
    8      -7   +43
(  15)  ( -14M   +5)
               + 2    +20
             (  -9H   +4)
               + 1    +13
             (  -9)(   +3)
REGION  03  STATE   08   DELAWARE
 POL.CD.
AUDITS
 LEVEL 1
LOU    UP
                                      REP ORG   001   LAB  313002

                          -PROBABILITY LIMITS	
 LEVEL 2
LOW    UP
 LEVEL 3
LOU    UP
 LEVEL 4
LOW    UP
             ** DATA  FOR COMPARISON WAS UNAVAILABLE  **
                                                 (continued)
                                    F-82
-------
                           TABLE F-2 (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY  REPORTING SYSTEM

            COMPARISON  REPORT OF 2ADHS ACCURACY AUDITS  £ PARS
DATE 11/17/86               DATA SELECTED FOR YEAR  1985           PAGE NO.
REGION  03  STATE   09   DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA      REP  ORG   001   LAB  312100
 POL.CD.    AUDITS
             ** DATA  FOR COMPARISON WAS UNAVAILABLE  **
REGION  03  STATE   21   MARYLAND                  REP ORG   001   LAB  312001
LEVEL 1
LOU UP
	 rKU0A0X.li.LJ
LEVEL 2
LOU UP
LI Jjin-Lis 	
LEVEL 3
LOU UP
LEVEL t
LOU UP
LEVEL 1
LOU UP
	 rKUOACAliJL J
LEVEL 2
LOU UP
LI jjxnj.j.:> 	
LEVEL 3
LOU UP
LEVEL 4
LOU UP
 POL.CD.    AUDITS


C42401 S02      14       -H    +22      -3   +13      -6    +13       -9   +17
   PARS     (   22)   (  -14H   +6)   (  -12H  +7)  ( -12H   +7)
                                                 (continued)

                                   F-83
-------
                           TABLE F-2 (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                      EMSL  PRECISIONXACCURACY REPORTING SYSTEM
            COMPARISON  REPORT OF 2ADHS ACCURACY AUDITS  £  PARS
DATE 11/17x86
               DATA SELECTED  FOR YEAR 1985
                                             PAGE NO.
REGION  03  STATE   21   MARYLAND
 POL.CD.    AUDITS
                                      REP ORG  003  LAB   412004
LEVEL 1
LOU UP
	 rKUDfl.DjLi.J-J
LEVEL 2
LOU UP
LEVEL 3
LOU UP
LEVEL 4
LOU UP
             ** DATA  FOR COMPARISON UAS UNAVAILABLE  **
REGION  03  STATE   21   MARYLAND
 POL.CD.
C42401 S03
   PARS
AUDITS
    4
    7)
   LEVEL 1
  LOU    UP
(   -7K
+ 9
+ 1)
                                      REP ORG  005  LAB   412002

                          -PROBABILITY LIMITS	
        LEVEL 2
       LOU    UP
   + 1
(  -4M
+5
+ 2)
   LEVEL 3
  LOU    UP

   + 5    +5
(   -4M  +2)
                                LEVEL 4
                               LOU    UP
                                                 (continued)
                                    F-84
-------
                           TABLE F-2  (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  AGENCY
                       EMSL  PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING SYSTEM
            COMPARISON  REPORT OF 2ADHS ACCURACY AUDITS £ PARS
DATE 11/17/86
               DATA  SELECTED  FOR YEAR 1985
                                             PAGE NO.
REGION  03  STATE   39   PENNSYLVANIA
                                      REP ORG  001  LAB   311002
POL. CD. AUDITS LEVEL 1
LOU UP
C42401 S02 16 -5 +17
PARS ( 31) ( -11)C +13)
LEVEL 2
LOU UP
+ 3 +10
( -11)( +13)
xx i*j.rii. ti> 	
LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4
LOU UP LOU UP
+ 0 +14
( -11M +12)
REGION  03  STATE   39   PENNSYLVANIA
 POL.CD.
C42401 S02
   PARS
                                      REP ORG  002  LAB  411002

                          -PROBABILITY LIMITS	
AUDITS
   27
   34)
   LEVEL 1
  LOU    UP

   + 0   +10
(  -12H  +6)
   LEVEL 2
  LOU    UP

   + 0    +7
(  -10M  +6)
   LEVEL 3
  LOU    UP
   + 0
(  -10H
+7
+7)
 LEVEL 4
LOU    UP

 -1    +7
                                                (continued)
                                   F-85
-------
                           TABLE F-2  (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY
       EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING  SYSTEM
            COMPARISON REPORT OF BRDHS  ACCURACY AUDITS £ PARS
DATE 11/17/86
DATA SELECTED  FOR YEAR 1985
PAGE NO.
REGION  03   STATE  39  PENNSYLVANIA
                       REP ORG  003  LAB   411001
POL. CD.
C42401 S02
PARS
REGIOK 03
POL. CD.
C42401 S02
PARS
AUDITS
8
( 8)
STATE
AUDITS
8
( 10)
LEVEL
LOU
+ 2
( -18K
1
UP
+7
+3)
48 VIRGINIA
LEVEL
LOU
-2
( -11M
1
UP
+ 4
+7)
L£V£L
LOU
+ 0

LEVEL
LOU
-2
( -8)(
,C J.iiJ.1 I
2
UP
+ 8
+ 1) (
ABILITY
2
UP
+ 3
+ 5) (
iij.nj.ia-
LEVEL
LOU
+ 0
REP ORG
LIMITS-
LEVEL
LOU
-2
-10H
3 LEVEL 4
UP LOU UP
+ 8
+ 3)
001 LAB 315001
3 LEVEL 4
UP LOU UP
+ 4
+ 3)
                                                  (continued)
                                    F-86
-------
                           TABLE F-2  (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY
                       EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING SYSTEM
            COMPARISON REPORT OF 2ADHS  ACCURACY AUDITS L PARS
DATE 11/17x86
                DATA SELECTED FOR YEAR  1985
                                            PAGE NO.
                                         10
REGION  03  STATE   48  VIRGINIA
                                      REP  ORG   003  LAB  415004
	 rKUJSABJ-ljJ.
POL. CD. AUDITS LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2
LOW UP LOW UP
C42401 S02
PARS (
12 +0 +19 +5 +11
14) ( -IDC +10) ( -11M +12)
xi jjjLnxis 	
LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4
LOU UP LOW UP
+ 2 +13
( -9K +13)
        03  STATE   50   WEST VIRGINIA
                                      REP  ORG   001  LAB  314001
                                       -PROBABILITY LIMITS-
 POL. CD.
AUDITS
 LEVEL 1
LOW    UP
 LEVEL 2
LOW    UP
 LEVEL 3
LOW    UP
 LEVEL 4
LOW    UP
             ** DATA  FOR COMPARISON WAS UNAVAILABLE **
                                                (continued)
                                   F-87
-------
                           TABLE F-2  (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  AGENCY   EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY  REPORTING SYSTEM

            COMPARISON  REPORT OF SADHS ACCURACY AUDITS £ PARS
DATE 11/17/86               DATA SELECTED FOR YEAR  1985           PAGE NO.   11
REGION  03  STATE   50   WEST VIRGINIA             REP ORG   002   LAB  314002

                       	PROBABILITY
 POL.CD.    AUDITS      LEVEL 1        LEVEL 2       LEVEL  3        LEVEL <*
                       LOW    UP     LOW    UP     LOW     UP      LOW    UP

C42H01 S02      8       -7    +0      -5    +2      -3     +1
   PARS     (  22)   (  -12H  +11)  (  -5)C  +7)   (  -6)(   +6)
REGION  OH  STATE   01   ALABAMA                   REP  ORG   012  LAB  419001

                       	PROBABILITY
 POI-.CD.    AUDITS      LEVEL 1        LEVEL 2        LEVEL 3       LEVEL 4
                       LOW    UP     LOW    UP      LOW     UP     LOW    UP

              **  DATA  FOR COMPARISON WAS UNAVAILABLE **
                                                 (continued)

                                    F-88
-------
                           TABLE F-2  (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   EMSI PRECISION/ACCURACY  REPORTING SYSTEM

            COMPARISON  REPORT OF BADHS ACCURACY AUDITS  £ PARS
DATE 11/17/86               DATA SELECTED FOR YEAR  1985           PAGE NO.   12
REGION  04  STATE   01   ALABAMA                   REP ORG   013  LAB  319001

                       	PROBABILITY LIMITS	

 POL.CD.    AUDITS      LEVEL 1       LEVEL 2       LEVEL  3       LEVEL 4
                       LOU    UP     LOU    UP     LOU     UP      LOU    UP

             ** DATA FOR COMPARISON UAS UNAVAILABLE **
REGION  04  STATE   01   ALABAMA                   REP ORG   015  LAB  419005

                       	PROBABILITY LIMITS	

 POL.CD.    AUDITS      LEVEL 1       LEVEL 2       LEVEL  3       LEVEL 4
                       LOU     UP     LOU    UP     LOU     UP      LOU    UP

C42401 S02      4      +44    +44      + 2    +3      -2     -2
   PARS     (   5)   (  -13H  +14)   ( -14H +18)   (  -9M   -2)
                                                (continued)
                                   F-89
-------
                           TABLE F-2  (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING SYSTEM
            COMPARISON REPORT OF BADHS ACCURACY  AUDITS £ PARS
DATE 11/17/86
                           DATA SELECTED FOR YEAR  1985
                                                                  PAGE NO.
13
REGION  04  STATE   10   FLORIDA
                                                  REP  ORG  001  LAB  323005
POL. CD.
            AUDITS
LEVEL 1
LOU UP
LEVEL 2
LOU UP
LEVEL 3
LOU UP
LEVEL 4
LOU UP
             ** DATA  FOR COMPARISON UAS UNAVAILABLE  **
REGION  04  STATE   10   FLORIDA
                                                  REP  ORG  002  LAB  323003
POL. CD.
C42401 SOS
PARS
	 rKUBABiJjJ.XI i.j.nj.15 	
AUDITS LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4
LOU UP LOU UP LOU UP LOU UP
i 9 -3 +34 +2 +19
( 6) ( -27H +17) ( -8)( +11) ( +OH +5)
                                                (continued)
                                   F-90
-------
                           TABLE F-2 (Continued)
LEVEL 1
LOU UP
LEVEL 2
LOU UP
LEVEL 3
LOU UP
LEVEL 4
LOU UP
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING SYSTEM

            COMPARISON REPORT OF 2ADHS ACCURACY  AUDITS  £  PARS
DATE 11/17/86               DATA SELECTED FOR YEAR  1985           PAGE NO.
REGION  04  STATE   10   FLORIDA                    REP  ORG   003  LAB  323004
 POL. CD.    AUDITS
C42401 S02       4       +2     +2      -1    +4      -1     -1
   PARS      (    6)   (  -23M   +5)  ( -17)( +11)   ( -16)(  +11)
REGION  04  STATE   10   FLORIDA                   REF  ORG   004  LAB  323008

                       	PROBABILITY LIMITS	

 POL.CD.    AUDITS      LEVEL 1       LEVEL 2       LEVEL  3       LEVEL 4
                       LOU    UP     LOU    UP     LOU    UP     LOU    UP

             ** DATA FOR COMPARISON UAS UNAVAILABLE **
                                                (continued)

                                   F-91
-------
                           TABLE  F-2 (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY  REPORTING SYSTEM

            COMPARISON  REPORT OF CADHS ACCURACY AUDITS  £ PARS
DATE 11/17/86               DATA SELECTED FOR YEAR  1985           PAGE NO.   IS
REGION  04  STATE   10   FLORIDA                   REP ORG   005  LAB  323002

                       	PROBABILITY LIMITS	

 POL.CD,    AUDITS      LEVEL 1       LEVEL 2       LEVEL  3       LEVEL 4
                       LOU    UP     LOU    UP     LOU     UP     LOU    UP

             ** DATA FOR COMPARISON UAS UNAVAILABLE **



REGION  01  STATE   10   FLORIDA                   REP ORG   007  LAB  323010

                       	PROBABILITY LIMITS	

 POL.CD.    AUDITS      LEVEL 1       LEVEL 2       LEVEL  3       LEVEL 4
                       LOU    UP     LOU    UP     LOU     UP     LOU    UP

             ** DATA FOR COMPARISON UAS UNAVAILABLE **
                                                 (continued)

                                    F-92
-------
                            TABLE F-2 (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGEKCY
EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING SYSTEM
            COMPARISON REPORT OF SADHS  ACCURACY AUDITS £ PARS
DATE 11/17/86               DATA SELECTED  FOR  YEAR 1985           PAGE  HO.
REGION  04  STATE   10  FLORIDA
                REP  ORG  011  LAB  423003
POL. CD. AUDITS LEVEL 1
LOU UP
C42401 S02 12 -74 +12
PARS ( 20) ( -21M +15)
	 rK.UBABJ.liX
LEVEL 2
LOU UP
-66 +7
( -12)( +10)
ri 4jJ.ru. is 	
LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4
LOU UP LOU UP
-72 +12
( -11H +12)
REGION  04  STATE   10   FLORIDA
                REP  ORG  012  LAB  423004
POL. CD.

C42401 S02
PARS
C42401 S02
PARS
AUDITS

22
( 10)
22
( 31)
LEVEL
LOU
-4
( -9H
-4
( -13) (
1
UP
+ 12
+7)
+ 12
+ 10)
	 fK
LEVEL
LOU
-6
( -7M
-6
( -7) (
3
UP
+ 8
+ 10)
+8
+ 6)
LEVEL
LOU
-4
( -2)(
-4

4
UP
+ 1
+ 4)
+ 1

                                   F-93
                                                (continued)
-------
                            TABLE F-2 (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY    EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING  SYSTEM
             COMPARISON REPORT  OF 2ADHS ACCURACY  AUDITS £ PARS
DATE 11/17/86
                            DATA  SELECTED FOR YEAR  1985
                                                                    PAGE NO.
REGION   04   STATE  10  FLORIDA
                                                    REP ORG  013   LAB   423016
,01. ».
C42401 S02
PARS
REGION 04
POL. CD.
AURITS LEVEL
LOU
13 -12
( 18) ( -16)(
1
iJP
+ 8
+5)
STATE 10 FLORIDA
AUDITS LEVEL
LOU
1
UP
LEVEL 2
LOW UP
-8 +4
( -15)C +8) C

LEVEL 2
LOU UP
LEVEL 3
LOU L'F
-6 +1
-15)( +9)
REP ORG 014
LEVEL 3
LOU UP
LEVEL 4
LO?A! UP

LAB 423005
LEVEL 4
LOU UP
              ** DATA FOR COMPARISON HAS UNAVAILABLE **
                                                 (continued)
                                    F-94
                                   : , r.-iigjipsi'toi
-------
                           TABLE F-2 (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                       EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING  SYSTEM
            COMPARISON  REPORT OF 8ADHS ACCURACY AUDITS  £  PARS
DATE 11/17/86
               DATA  SELECTED FOR YEAR 1985
                                             PAGE NO.
REGION  04  STATE   10   FLORIDA
 POL.CD.
AUDITS
   LEVEL 1
  LOU    UP
                                      REP ORG  015  LAB   423015

                          -PROBABILITY LIMITS	
 LEVEL 2
LOU    UP
 LEVEL 3
LOU    UP
 LEVEL 4
LOU    UP
             ** DATA  FOR COMPARISON UAS UNAVAILABLE  **
REGION  04  STATE   10   FLORIDA
 POL.CD.
C42401 S02
   PARS
AUDITS
    4
    6)
   LEVEL 1
  LOU    UP
                                      REP ORG  016  LAB   423008

                          -PROBABILITY LIMITS	
 LEVEL 2
LOW    UP
 LEVEL 3
LOU    UP
 LEVEL 4
LOW    UP
   + 2    +2      +7    +9       + 8    +8
C  -10H +10)  (  -9H +15)   (   -5)(  +11)
                                                (continued)
                                   F-95
-------
                           TABLE F-2  (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING SYSTEM

            COMPARISON REPORT OF BADHS ACCURACY  AUDITS C PARS
DATE 11/17/86               DATA SELECTED FOR YEAR  1985          PAGE NO.    19
REGION  04  STATE   10   FLORIDA                    REP  ORG  017  LAB  423001

                       	PROBABILITY LIMITS	

 POL.CD,    AUDITS      LEVEL 1       LEVEL 2        LEVEL 3       LEVEL 4
                       LOU    UP     LOU    UP      LOU    UP     LOU    UP

             **  DATA FOR COMPARISON UAS UNAVAILABLE **
REGION  04  STATE   10   FLORIDA                    REP ORG  018  LAB  423002

                       	PROBABILITY LIMITS	

 POL.CD.    AUDITS      LEVEL 1       LEVEL  2        LEVEL 3       LEVEL  4
                       LOU    UP     LOU     UP      LOU    UP     LOU     UP

             **  DATA  FOR COMPARISON HAS UNAVAILABLE **
                                                 (continued)

                                    F-96

-------
                           TABLE F-2 (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY
       EMST, PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING  SYSTEM
             COMPARISON REPORT OF 2ADHS  ACCURACY AUDITS £ PARS
DATE 11/17/86
DATA SELECTED  FOR  YEAR 1985
PAGE NO.
20
REGION  04   STATE  11   GEORGIA
                       REP ORG  010  LAB   321001
POL. CD.
C42401 S02
PARS
REGION 04
POL. CD.
C42401 S02
PARS
AUDITS
8
( 10)
STATE
AUDITS
3
( 30)
LEVEL 1
LOU UP
+ 7 +26
( -16H +15)
18 KENTUCKY
LEVEL 1
LOU UP
+ 3 +3
( -11H +12)
	 rKUHAOXliJLJLI
LEVEL 2
LOU UP
+ 8 +28
( -15H +8) (
nTinv 11 VTT T i1 v
LEVEL 2
LOU UP
+ 3 +4
( -12M +7) (
iixnxia
LEVEL
LOU
-2
REP ORG
T TMT TO
LIMITS
LEVEL
LOU
-14M
3 LEVEL 4
UP LOU UP
+ 32
+ 10)
001 LAB 316001
3 LEVEL 4
UP LOU UP
+7)
                                                 (continued)
                                    F-97
-------
                           TABLE F-2  (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY
                       EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY  REPORTING SYSTEM
            COMPARISON REPORT OF 2ADHS  ACCURACY AUDITS £ PARS
DATE 11/17/86               DATA SELECTED  FOR  YEAR 1985
                                                      PAGE NO.
REGION  04  STATE   18  KENTUCKY
                                      REP ORG   002  LAB  416001
 POL.CD.
C42401 S02
   PARS
AUDT.TS
   12
LEVEL 1
LOU UP
+ 2 +17
-20H +11)
LEVEL 2
LOU UP
+ 6 +10
( -9)( +6)
ii ii±nj.t:>-
LEVEL
LOU
+ 5
( -13M
3
UP
+8
+ 6)
LEVEL 4
LOU UP

REGION  t)H   STATE   25  MISSISSIPPI
 POL.CD.
       S02
   PARS
AUDITS
 LEVEL 1
LOU    UP
                                      REP  ORG

                          -PROBABILITY LIMITS-
                                      100   LAB   322001
 LEVEL 2
LOU    UP
 LEVEL 3
LOU    UP
    A      -6     +8
(  11)  C -29H   +7)
                              + 0    +1
             (  -19H   +0)  ( -15H  -2)
 LEVEL 4
LOU    UP
                                                 (continued)
                                    F-98
-------
                           TABLE F-2  (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY
                       EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING  SYSTEM
             COMPARISON REPORT OF BADHS ACCURACY  AUDITS  £ PARS
DATE 11/17/86
                DATA  SELECTED FOR YEAR 1985
                                           PAGE NO.
                                          22
REGION  04  STATE   34   NORTH CAROLINA
                                      REP ORG  001   LAB   318001
POL. CD. AUDITS LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2

C42401 S02
PARS (
LOU UP LOU UP
17 -10 +2 -5 +6
17) ( -14)( +9) ( -16M +10)
LEVEL 3
LOU
-8
( -16M
UP
+ 9
+ 12)
LEVEL
LOU
-1
( -11H
4
UP
-1
+ 14)
REGION  01  STATE   34   NORTH CAROLINA
                                      REP ORG  002   LAB   418003
 POL.CD.
C42401 S02
   PARS
                                       •PROBABILITY  LIMITS-
AUDITS
 LEVEL 1
LOU    UP
    8      -9   +13
    8)  ( -21H  +5)
   LEVEL 2
  LOU    UP

  -10    -1
(  -15M  +6)
   LEVEL 3
  LOU    UP

  -11    -4
(  -14H  +5>
 LEVEL 4
LOU    UP
                                                (continued)
                                   F-99
-------
                           TABLE F-2  (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY  REPORTING SYSTEM
            COMPARISON  REPORT OF 2ADHS ACCURACY AUDITS  £  PARS
DATE 11/17/86
DATA SELECTED FOR YEAR  1985
                                                                  PAGE NO.
                                                                             23
REGION  OH  STATE
 POL. CD
            AUDITS
                        NORTH  CAROLINA            REP ORG   003  LAB  118006

                       	PROBABILITY
           LEVEL  1
          LOW     UP
          LEVEL  2
         LOW     UP
                              LEVEL 3
                             LOW    UP
             **  DATA  FOR COMPARISON WAS UNAVAILABLE  **
                                                                  LEVEL 1
                                                                 LOW    UP
REGION  OH  STATE   H2   SOUTH CAROLINA
                                                   REP ORG  001  LAB  320001
POL. CD.
C42401 S02
   PARS
                                       PROBABILITY  LIMITS
AUDITS
 LEVEL 1
LOW    UP
           LEVEL  2
         LOW     UP
                                                     LEVEL 3
                                                    LOW    UP
                                                                   LEVEL  4
                                                                  LOW     UP
                16      -26   +18      -3     +6       -1    +7
             (   83)   (  -20M +11)  ( -11M  +10)   (  -11M +10)
                                                 (continued)
                                    F-100
-------
                           TABLE F-2 (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  AGENCY    EMSL PRECISIOHXACCURACY REPORTING  SYSTEM
            COMPARISON REPORT  OF  £ADHS ACCURACY AUDITS £ PARS
D.IT:: n/ 17/86
                           DATA  SELECTED FOR YEAR 1985
                                                                  PAGE  NO.
REGION  OH  STATE
 POL. CD.
C<4£ti01 S02
   PARS
            AUDITS
13
                       TENNESSEE
                                                  REP ORG  001   LAB   317001
LEVEL 1
LOW UP
	 PROBABXI.il
LEVEL 2
LOW UP
ri L-Lnxis 	
LEVEL 3
LOW UP
LEVEL 1
LOW UP
                     -16
                             +25
                                      -9
                               +23
                                                   -16
                                          +28
                                                                  -16
                                                                        +28
             (    9)   (  -11H  +12)   (  -10H +12)  (  -9)( +10)   (  -14H  +11)
REGION  OH  STATE  HH   TENNESSEE
POL. CD.
AUDITS
                        LEVEL  1
                       LOW     UP
                                                  REP ORG   002   LAB

                                       PROBABILITY LIMITS
                      LEVEL  2
                     LOW     UP
                                                    LEVEL 3
                                                   LOW    UP
                                                                   LEVEL H
                                                                  LOW    UP
             **  DATA  FOR COMPARISON WAS UNAVAILABLE **
                                                (continued)
                                   F-101
-------
                            TABLE F-2 (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING SYSTEM

            COMPARISON  REPORT OF 2ADHS ACCURACY AUDITS  £ PARS
DATE 11/17/86               DATA SELECTED FOR YEAR  1985           PAGE NO.   25
REGION  04  STATE   44   TEKKESSEE                  REP  ORG  003  LAB  417003
 POL. CD.    AUDITS
       S02       4       +4    +4      +9   MO       +7     +7
   PARS      (    8)   (   -8H   +9)  (  -5H  +5)   (   -6)C  +11)
REGION  04  STATE   44   TENNESSEE                  REP  ORG  006  LAB  417001

                       	PROBABILITY LIMITS	

 POL.CD.    AUDITS      LEVEL 1       LEVEL  2        LEVEL 3       LEVEL 4
                       LOU    UP     LOU     UP      LOU    UP     LOU    UP

              **  DATA FOR COMPARISON UAS UNAVAILABLE **
LEVEL 1
T-OW UP
	 i'KUBflBJ.iiJL J
LEVEL 2
LOW U?
LI .Lin-LiS 	
LEVEL 3
LOU UP
LEVEL 4
LOU UP
                                                 (continued)

                                    F-102
-------
                           TABLE F-2  (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY
                       EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING SYSTEM
             COMPARISON REPORT OF BADHS  ACCURACY AUDITS £ PARS
DATE 11/17X86
                DATA SELECTED FOR YEAR  1985
                                            P7.GE NO.
REGION  05  STATE   11  ILLINOIS
                                       REP  ORG  001  LAB  328001
POL. CD. AUDITS LEVEL 1
LOW UP
C42401 S02 12 -30 +61
PARS ( 23) C -17)( +14)
LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4
LOU UP LOU UP LOU UP
-10 +20 -12 +19
( -14H +12) ( -13M +12) ( -15H +16
REGION  05  STATE   14  ILLINOIS
                                      REP  ORG

                          -PROBABILITY LIMITS-
                                      003   LAB  428001
 TCL.CD.
AUDITS
 LEVEL  1
LOU     UP
 LEVEL 2
LOW    UP
 LEVEL 3
LOU    UP
 LEVEL 4
LOU    UP
              **  DATA FOR COMPARISON WAS  UNAVAILABLE **
                                                (continued)
                                   F-103
-------
                            TABLE F-2 (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY   EMSL  PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING SYSTEM
            COMPARISON REPORT OF BADHS  ACCURACY AUDITS £ PARS
DATE 11/17/86               DATA SELECTED  FOR YEAR 1985
                PAGE NO.
27
REGION  05  STATE   15  INDIANA
REP ORG  001   LAB  329001
POL. CD.
C42101 S02
PARS
REGION 05
POL. CD.
C42401 S02
PARS
AUDITS LEVEL
LOU
12 -2
( 38) ( -12M
1
UP
+ 1
+ 11)
STATE 15 INDIANA
AUDITS LEVEL
LOU
4 +2
1
UP
+ 2
+5)
	 FKUBA
LEVEL
LOU
*- <
( -9)( +
nn n B ff
LEVEL
LOU
-3
( -13K
BJ.LJLTZ
2
UP
+5
10) (
BILITY
2
UP
+ 0
Juinxii-
LEVEL
LOU
+ 1
-7M
REP ORG
LIMITS-
LEVEL
LOU
-13H
3
UP
+ 3
+ 9)
002
3
UP
+5)
LEVEL 4
LOU UP

LAB 1(29002
LEVEL H
LOU UP

                                                 (continued)
                                    F-104
-------
                           TABLE F-2  (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY  REPORTING SYSTEM

            COMPARISON  REPORT OF 2ADHS ACCURACY AUDITS  C PARS
DATE 11/17/86               DATA SELECTED FOR YEAR  1985           PAGE NO.   28
REGION  05  STATE   15   INDIANA                   REP  ORG   005  LAB  429005

                       	PROBABILITY LIMITS	

 POL.CD.    AUDITS      LEVEL 1       LEVEL 2        LEVEL  3       LEVEL 1
                       LOU    UP     LOU    UP     LOU    UP      LOU    UP

             ** DATA FOR COMPARISON HAS UNAVAILABLE **



REGION  05  STATE   15   INDIANA                   REP  ORG   008  LAB  429004

                       	PROBABILITY LIMITS	

 POL.CD.    AUDITS      LEVEL 1       LEVEL 2        LEVEL  3       LEVEL H
                       LOU    UP     LOU    UP     LOU    UP      LOU    UP

C42401 S02      8       +0    +5      +2    + H       -2    +5
   PARS     (   8)   (   -6)(  +11)   (  -5)C +11)   (   -3)(   +8)
                                                (continued)

                                   F-105
-------
                           TABLE F-2  (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY   EMSI PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING SYSTEM

            COMPARISON REPORT OF 2ADHS ACCURACY  AUDITS £ PARS
DATE 11/17/86               DATA SELECTED FOR  YEAR 1985          PAGE NO.    29
REGION  05  STATE   15  INDIANA                    REP ORG  010  LAB   429001

                       	PROBABILITY LIMITS	

 POL.CD.    AUDITS      LEVEL 1       LEVEL  2        LEVEL 3       LEVEL  4
                       LOU    UP     LOU     UP      LOU    UP     LOU     UP

             **  DATA FOR COMPARISON UA£ UHAVAILABLE **
REGION  05  STATE   15   INDIANA                    REP ORG  100  LAB  329002

                       	PROBABILITY LIMITS	

 POL.CD.    AUDITS      LEVEL 1       LEVEL  2        LEVEL 3       LEVEL  4
                       LOU    UP     LOU     UP      LOU    UP     LOU     UP

              **  DATA FOR COMPARISON HAS UNAVAILABLE **
                                                (continued)

                                   F-106
-------
                            TABLE F-2 (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                                   EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY  REPORTING SYSTEM
            COMPARISON REPORT OF 2ADHS ACCURACY AUDITS  £  PARS
DATE 11/17/86
                            DATA SELECTED FOR YEAR  1985
                                                 PAGE NO.
                                                         30
REGION  05  STATE   23   MICHIGAN
 POL.CD.
            AUDITS
       LEVEL  1
      LOU     UP
                                                  REP  ORG   001   LAB  326001

                                       -PROBABILITY LIMITS	
                 LEVEL  2
                LOU     UP
 LEVEL 3
LOU    UP
C42401 S02       H       +7     +7      +6   +12     +11    +11
   PARS      (   12)   (  -20M   +9)  ( -17M  +9)   ( -18H  +10)
 LEVEL 
-------
                            TABLE F-2 (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING  SYSTEM
            COMPARISON REPORT OF CADHS ACCURACY AUDITS £ PARS
DATE 11/17/86
DATA SELECTED  FOR  YEAR 1985
PAGE NO.
31
REGION  05  STATE   24  MINNESOTA
                       REP ORG  001  LAB   324001
POL. CD. AUDITS LEVEL 1
LOU UP
C42401 S02 17 -2 +13
PARS ( 24) ( -7M +10)
	 rKUJ5A0J.J.J.
LEVEL 2
LOU UP
-2 +9
( -6)( +9)
ri ijxnxia 	
LEVEL 3
LOU UP
-2 +10
( -7H +8)
LEVEL 4
LOU UP
+ 4 + 4
( +2)( + 4)
REGION  05   STATE  36  OHIO
                       REP ORG  001   LAB  327001
	 rKUBABJ.LJ.TX LiHiTi 	
POL. CD. AUDITS LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3

C42401 S02
PARS (
LOU UP LOU UP LOU UP
8 -22 +9 -24 +11
5) ( -28H +28) ( -26H +25) ( -31M +30)
LEVEL 4
LOU UP
-29 -27

                                                 (continued)
                                    F-108
-------
                            TABLE F-2 (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGSHCY
                       EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING SYSTEM
             COMPARISON REPORT OF SADHS  ACCURACY AUDITS £ PARS
DATS 11/17/86
                DATA SELECTED FOR YEAR  1985
                                            PAGE NO.
                                         32
REGION  05   STATE  36  OHIO
                                       REP ORG  002  LAB  327003
	 ritUJBABJ.liJL
POL. CD. AUDITS LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2

C42401 S02
PARS (
LOU UP LOU UP
8 -16 +8 -11 -1
8) ( -23)( +9) ( -27)( +14)
ii iij.nj.ii 	
LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4
LOU UP LOU UP
-10 +1
( -34H +18)
REGION  05  STATE   36  OHIO
                                       REP  ORG  003  LAB  327005

                          -PROBABILITY LIMITS	
 POL.CD.
AUDITS
 LEVEL  1
LOU     UP
 LEVEL 2
LOU    UP
 LEVEL 3
LOU    UP
 LEVEL 4
LOU    UP
              **  DATA FOR COMPARISON HAS  UNAVAILABLE **
                                                 (continued)
                                   F-109
-------
                           TABLE F-2  (Continued)
EHVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING SYSTEM
            COMPARISON REPORT OF 2ADHS ACCURACY  AUDITS £ PARS
DATE 11/17/86
               DATA SELECTED  FOR YEAR 1985
                                                                  PAGE NO.
                                                        33
REGION  05  STATE   36  OHIO
                                      REP ORG  004   LAB   327007
	 PROS ABILITY LJ.nj.TS 	
POL. CD. AUDITS LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4
LOW UP LOW UP LOU UP LOW UP
C42401 S02
P&P.S <
8 -16 +28 -11 + 24 -13 +25
kt ( -23)C +43) ( -30H +45) ( -29K +40)
REGION   05   STATS  36  OHIO
 POL.CD.
C42401  S02
   PARS
AUDITS
   12
    4)
   LEVEL 1
  LOW    UP
                                      REP ORG   006   LAB  427001

                          -PROBABILITY LIMITS	
 LEVEL 2
LOW    UP
 LEVEL 3
LOW    UP
 LEVEL 4
LOW    UP
   -6   +16      -5     +6       -8    +6
(  -19H +11)  ( -10)(  +16)   C   -9)( +17)
                                                 (continued)
                                    F-110
-------
                           TABLE F-2  (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING SYSTEM

            COMPARISON REPORT OF CADHS ACCURACY  AUDITS  £  PARS
DATE 11/17/86               DATA SELECTED FOR YEAR  1985           PAGE NO.
REGION  05  STATE   36   OHIO                       REP  ORG   007  LAB  427002
 POL.CD.    AUDITS
C42401 S02      8       -8    +6      -6    +3       -5     +1
   PARS     C   5)   {  -24M  +13)  ( -13H +10)   (  -12M   +7)
REGION  05  STftTS   36   OHTO                      REP  OSG   008  LAB  427003

                       	PROBABILITY  LIMITS	

 POL.CD.    AUDITS      LEVEL 1        LEVEL 2        LEVEL  3       LEVEL 4
                       LOW    UP     LOW    UP      LOW    UP     LOW    UP

     i S02      12       +4    *9      +2    +8       +2    +8
   PARS     (   7)   (  -10)( +27)   (  -6)( +15)   (  -11)( +14)
LEVEL 1
LOU UP
	 fK
-------
                           TABLE F-2  (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  AGENCY   EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY  REPORTING SYSTEM
            COMPARISON  REPORT OF 2ADHS ACCURACY AUDITS £ PARS
DATE 11/17/86
               DATA SELECTED  FOR YEAR 1985
                                             PAGE NO.
                                          35
REGION  05  STATE   36   OHIO
                                      REP ORG  009  LAB  427004
	 rKUBAUilii
POL. CD. AUDITS LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2

C42401 S02
PARS (
LOU UP LOU UP
8 -8 +18 +0 +6
*) C -24H +20) ( -13K +16)
ri jjxnxis 	
LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4
LOU UP LOU UP
+ 0 +6
( -16K +20)
REGION  05  STATE   36   OHIO
 POL.CD.
C42401 S02
   PARS
AUDITS
    8
    4)
   LEVEL 1
  LOU    UP

  -11   +13
I   -8)(  +4)
                                      REP ORG  010  LAB   427005

                          -PROBABILITY LIMITS	
   LEVEL 2
  LOU    UP
   -7
(  -12H
+ 6
+7)
   LEVEL 3
  LOU    UP

  -13   +10
(  -13)(  +8)
                       LEVEL 4
                      LOU    UP
                                                 (continued)
                                    F-112
-------
                           TABLE F-2 (Continued)
ENVIROKMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY    EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING SYSTEM

            COMPARISON REPORT  OF  BADHS ACCURACY AUDITS £ PARS
DATE 11/17/86               DATA SELECTED FOR YEAR 1985          PAGE NO.    36
REGION  05  STATE  36  OHIO                       REP ORG  012  LAB  427007

                      	PROBABILITY LIMITS	

 POL.CD.    AUDITS     LEVEL  1        LEVEL 2       LEVEL 3       LEVEL  4
                      LOU     UP      LOU    UP     LOU    UP     LOU     UP

C42401 S02      8     -13   + 34       -3   +17      -4   +13
   PARS     (   5)   (  -4)(   +7)   (   -4)(  +12)  (  -5M +15)
REGION  05  STATE  36   OHIO                       REP ORG  013  LAB   427010

                      	PROBABILITY LIMITS	

 POL.CD.    AUDITS      LEVEL  1        LEVEL 2       LEVEL 3       LEVEL  4
                      LOU     UP      LOU    UP     LOU    UP     LOU     UP

C42401 S02      4                    -28   +16
   PARS     (   2)   ( -34H +42)   C  -43)( +46)  ( -42M +45)
                                                (continued)
                                   F-113
-------
                           TABLE F-2 (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY   EMSL  PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING  SYSTEM
            COMPARISON REPORT OF BADHS  ACCURACY AUDITS £ PARS
DATE 11X17/86
               DATA  SELECTED FOR YEAR  1985
                                            PAGE  NO.
                                        37
REGION  05  STATE   36  OHIO
                                      REP ORG   014  LAB  427008
POL. CD. AUDITS LEVEL 1

C42401 S02
PARS (
LOU UP
8 -13 +15
8) ( -n)C +14)
	 i'KUBABXljJ.
LEVEL 2
LOU UP
+ 1 +6
( -15H +17)
ii iiJ.nj.ia 	 • 	
LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4
LOU UP LOU UP
+ 3 +9
( -14M +17)
REGION  05   STATE  36  OHIO
                                      REP  ORG

                          -PROBABILITY LIMITS-
                                     015   LAB  427009
 POL.CD.
AUDITS
 LEVEL 1
LOU    UP
 LEVEL 2
LOU    UP
 LEVEL 3
LOU    UP
 LEVEL 4
LOU    UP
              **  DATA FOR COMPARISON  UAS  UNAVAILABLE **
                                                 (continued)
                                    F-114
-------
                            TABLE F-2 (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY
       EMS!  PRECISION/ACCURACY  REPORTING SYSTEM
             COMPARISON REPORT  OF  BADHS ACCURACY  AUDITS £ PARS
DATE 11/17/86
DATA SELECTED  FOR YEAR 1985
PAGE NO.
38
REGION  05   STATE  36  OHIO
                       REP ORG   016  LAB  127012
POL. CD.
CH2H01 S02
PARS
REGION 05
POL. CD.
C42401 S02
PARS
AUDITS
8
( 5) (
STATE 51
AUDITS
'it*
( 21) (
LEVEL
LOU
-2
-42H
1
UP
+ 3
+ 58)
UISCONSIN
LEVEL
LOU
- 11
-7)(
1
UP
+ 11)
	 fKUB
LEVEL
LOU
-6
( -47M

LEVEL
LOU
( -3)(
ABJ..LJ, j ;i
2
UP
-1
+80) (
ABILITY
2
UP
+ 6) (
iij.nj.i2>
LEVEL
LOU
-10
REP ORG
LIMITS
LEVEL
LOU
-n
3
UP
+ 1
+77)
001
3
UP
•>-'*
+5)
LEVEL
LOU

4
UP

LAB 32500
LEVEL
LOU
-3
( -8M
UP
+ 2
+ 2


1
)
                                                 (continued)
                                    F-115
-------
                           TABLE F-2 (Continued)
EHVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                      EMSL  PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING  SYSTEM
            COMPARISON REPORT OF 2ADHS ACCURACY  AUDITS  £ PARS
DATE 11/17X86
               DATA SELECTED  FOR YEAR 1985
                                             PAGE NO.
                                        39
REGION  OS  STATE   04   ARKANSAS
                                      REP ORG  001   LAB   332001
POL. CD. AUDITS LEVEL 1

C42401 S02
PARS (
LOU UP
8 -3 +2
8) ( -50H +35)
LEVEL 2
LOU UP
-5 +2
( -44H +35)
-jri jjj.nx.ta 	
LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4
LOU
-3
( -44M
UP LOU UP
-2
+ 37)
REGION  06  STATE   19   LOUISIANA
 POL.CD.
C42401 S02
   PARS
AUDITS
    8
   18)
   LEVEL 1
  LOU    UP

   -4   +12
(  -11H +16)
                                      REP ORG  001   LAB  334001

                          •PROBABILITY LIMITS	
 LEVEL 2
LOU    UP

 -3   +13
 -9)( +13)
   LEVEL 3
  LOU    UP

   -2   + 14
(   -8)( +13)
 LEVEL 1
LOU    UP
                                                 (continued)
                                   F-116
-------
                           TABLE F-2  (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY  REPORTING SYSTEM

            COMPARISON  REPCHT OF 2ADHS ACCURACY AUDITS  £ PARS
DATE 11/17/86               DATA SELECTED FOR YEAR  1985           PAGE NO.
REGION  06  STATE   32   NEK MEXICO                REP ORG   001   LAB  330001

                       	PROBABILITY LIMITS	

 POL.CD.    AUDITS      LEVEL 1        LEVEL 2       LEVEL  3        LEVEL H
                       LOU     UP     LOU    UP     LOU     UP      LOU    UP

C42401 S02      12      -13     +7      -8    +5     -11     +3
   PARS     (   m)   (  -11)(  +13)   (   -7M +10)  (  -8)(   +9)
REGION  06  STATE  32  NEU  MEXICO                REP ORG  002   LAB   330001

                      	PROBABILITY LIMITS	—

 POL.CD.    AUDITS     LEVEL  1        LEVEL 2       LEVEL 3        LEVEL t
                      LOU     UP      LOU    UP     LOU    UP      LOU    UP

             ** DATA FOR COMPARISON UAS UNAVAILABLE **
                                                (continued)
                                   F-117
-------
                           TABLE  F-2 (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  AGENCY
                                   EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING  SYSTEM
            COMPARISON  REPORT  OF BADHS ACCURACY AUDITS £ PARS
DATE 11/17/06
                            DATA SELECTED FOR YEAR 1985
                                             PAGE NO.
REGION  06  STATE   37   OKLAHOMA
                                                  REP ORG   101   LAB   331001
 POL. CD.
C42401 S02
   PARS
            AUDITS
                6)
LEVEL 1
LOW UP
LEVEL 2
LOU UP
LEVEL 3
LOU UP
LEVEL 4
LOU UP
  +36   +36
(  -17M  +9)
   + 0   +23      +6    +6
(  -19)( +12)  ( -17M +10)
REGION  06  STATE   37   OKLAHOMA
                                                  REP ORG   102   LAB   H31001
 POL. CD.
C42401 S02
   PARS
            AUDITS
   LEVEL 1
  LOU    UP

  +17   +17
(   -9K +17)
                                      -PROBABILITY
                 LEVEL  2
                LOU     UP
                 LEVEL  3
                LOU     UP
                +13   +1U
              (  -8)(  +1)   (  -14H
                                                          +7)
 LEVEL H
LOU    UP
                                                (continued)
                                   F-118
-------
                           TABLE F-2  (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                       EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY  REPORTING SYSTEM
            COMPARISON REPORT OF QADHS ACCURACY  AUDITS C PARS
DATE 11/17/86
                DATA  SELECTED FOR YEAR  1985
                                             PAGE NO.
                                                42
REGION  06  STATE   37   OKLAHOMA
                                      REP ORG   103   LAB  431002
POL. CD. AUDITS LEVEL 1

C42401 S02
PARS (
LOU UP
8 -3 +22
8) ( -14U +6)
LEVEL 2
LOU UP
+ 2 +17
( -7H +7)
LEVEL 3 LEVEL t
LOU
+ 0
( -5M
UP LOU UP
+ 21
+ 4)
REGION  06  STATE   45   TEXAS
 POL.CD.
C42401 S02
   PARS
AUDITS
   36
   27)
   LEVEL 1
  LOU    UP
  -13
+8
                                      REP ORG

                          -PROBABILITY LIMITS-
                                       001  LAB   333001
        LEVEL 2
       LOU    UP
               LEVEL  3
             LOU     UP
-6
+ 5
C  -26M +16)  ( -15M   +7)
   -7
(  -13H
+5
+ 8)
                       LEVEL 4
                      LOU    UP
                                  ( -19M +12)
                                                (continued)
                                   F-119
-------
                           TABLE F-2  (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY   EMSL  PRECISIONXACCURACY REPORTING SYSTEM
            COMPARISON REPORT OF BADHS  ACCURACY AUDITS £ PARS
DATE 11/17/86
DATA SELECTED  FOR YEAR 1985
PAGE NO.
REGION  06  STATE   45  TEXAS
                       REP ORG  002   LAB   433002
POL. CD,
C42401 S02
PARS
REGION 06
POL, CD.
C42401 S02
PARS
AUDITS
( 4)
STATE
AUDITS
5
( 7)
LEVEL
LOU
-2
( -15H
45 TEXAS
LEVEL
LOU
+ 10
( -19H
1
UP
-2
+ 17)

1
UP
+ 10
-5)
	 fKUB/
LEVEL
LOU
+ 2
( -3H

LEVEL
LOU
+ 3
C -12H
ICJ-ljJLil
2
UP
+ 3
+ 8) C
IBILITY
2
UP
+8
+ 4) (
jjj.ru. la
LEVEL
LOU
+ 2
-3)(
REP ORG
LIMITS
LEVEL
LOU
+ 4
+ 3M
3
UP
+ 2
+ 11)
003
3
UP
+ 4
+ 4)
LEVEL
LOU

4
UP

LAB 433001
LEVEL
LOU
+ 3
4
UP
+ 3
+ 4)
                                                 (continued)
                                    F-120
-------
                           TABLE F-2 (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  AGENCY
                       EMSL  PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING  SYSTEM
            COMPARISON  REPORT OF SADHS ACCURACY AUDITS  £  PARS
DATE 11/17/86               DATA SELECTED FOR YEAR  1985
                                                     PAGE  NO.
                                                       44
REGION  06  STATE   45   TEXAS
                                      REP ORG  006  LAB   433008
POL. CD. AUDITS LEVEL 1
LOU UP
C42401 S02
PARS (
12 -25
14) ( -17H
+ 11
-5)
LEVEL 2
LOU UP
-50 +111
( -16H -5)
LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4
LOU UP LOU UP
+ 2
( -14M
+ 69
-2)
REGION  07  STATE   16   IOUA
 POL.CD.
C42401 S02
   PARS
AUDITS
    8
 LEVEL 1
LOU    UP
 -1
+ 16
                                      REP ORG  002  LAB   436002

                          -PROBABILITY LIMITS	
         LEVEL 2
        LOU    UP
-11
+ 11
(  12)  (  -9H  +2)   (   -6H   +5)
   LEVEL 3
  LOU    UP

  -12    +4
(   -7H +11)
                              LEVEL 4
                             LOU    UP
                                                (continued)
                                   F-121
-------
                           TABLE F-2 (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  AGENCY
                      EMSL  PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING SYSTEM
            COMPARISON REPORT  OF  2ADHS ACCURACY AUDITS £ PARS
DATE 11/17/86
               DATA SELECTED  FOR  YEAR 1985
                                             PAGE  NO.
                                          45
REGION  07  STATE   16  IOWA
 POL.CD.
C42401 S02
   PARS
AUDITS
   LEVEL 1
  LOU    UP
    6     + 29   +51
   10)  (  -8M +10)
                                      REP ORG  003  LAB  336001

                          -PROBABILITY LIMITS	
   LEVEL 2
  LOU    UP

  +33   +46
(   -7)(  +9)
   LEVEL 3
  LOU    UP

  +31   +45
(  -10H  +7)
 LEVEL 4
LOU    UP
REGION  07  STATE   17  KANSAS
 POL.CD.
C42401 S02
   PARS
AUDITS
    8
    5)
   LEVEL 1
  LOU    UP

   -9   +15
(  -26)( +16)
                                      REP CRS  001  LAB  337001

                          -PROBABILITY LIMITS	
   LEVEL 2
  LOU    UP

   -7    +0
(  -17)( +12)
   LEVEL 3
  LOU    UP

   -6    -5
( -12)( +11)
 LEVEL 4
LOU    UP
                                                 (continued)
                                    F-122
-------
                           TABLE F-2 (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
              EMSL  PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING SYSTEM
            COMPARISON  REPORT OF BADHS ACCURACY  AUDITS  £ PARS
DATE 11/17/86
       DATA SELECTED  FOR YEAR 1985
                             PAGE  NO.
REGION  07  STATE   26   MISSOURI
                              REP ORG  001  LAB  338001
POL. CD.
C42401 S02
PARS
REGION 07
POL. CD.
AUDITS
12
( 8)
STATE
AUDITS
LEVEL
LOU
-6
( -22H
1
UP
+ 2
+ 23)
26 MISSOURI
LEVEL
LOU
1
UP
	 fKUlSA13Xi,J.XI
LEVEL 2
LOU UP
-6 +3
( -17)( +14) (

LEVEL 2
LOU UP
i*j.nj.is>-
LEVEL
LOU
-7
-22M
REP ORG
LIMITS-
LEVEL
LOU
3
UP
+ 2
+ 9)
002
3
UP
LEVEL 4
LOU UP

LAB 438004
LEVEL 4
LOU UP
C42401 S02      12
   PARS     (   8)
   + 6   + 14
(  -22X +14)
 -3    +10      -2    +8
-11)(  +11)   ( -14K +11)
                                                (continued)
                                   F-123
-------
                           TABLE F-2 (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY    EMSL  PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING SYSTEM

            COMPARISON REPORT  OF  CADHS  ACCURACY AUDITS £ PARS
DATE 11/17/86               DATA SELECTED FOR YEAR 1985          PAGE  NO.    47
REGION  07  STATE  26  MISSOURI                   REP ORG  003  LAB   438003

                      	PROBABILITY LIMITS	

 POL.CD!    AUDITS     LEVEL  1        LEVEL 2       LEVEL 3        LEVEL  4
                      LOU     UP      LOU    UP     LOU    UP     LOU     UP

C42401 S02      7      + 4   +27       -6   +20      +3    +3
   PARS     C   6)   (  -8)( +23)   C   -4)( +20)  (  -8)(  +9)
REGION  07  STATE  26  MISSOURI                   REP ORG  004  LAB   438006

                      	PROBABILITY LIMITS	

 POL.CD.    AUDITS     LEVEL  1        LEVEL 2       LEVEL 3        LEVEL 4
                      LOU     UP      LOU    UP     LOU    UP      LOU    UP

             ** DATA FOR COMPARISON HAS UNAVAILABLE **
                                                (continued)

                                   F-124
-------
                           TABLE F-2  (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGEKCY
                       EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY  REPORTING SYSTEM
            COMPARISON REPORT OF 2ADHS ACCURACY  AUDITS £ PARS
DATE 11/17/86
                DATA  SELECTED FOR YEAR  1985
                                            PAGE NO.
	 PROBABILITY LIMITS 	
POT, .CD. AUDITS LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3
LOU UP LOU UP LOU UP I
C42U01 S02
PARS (
9 -1 + 3 +0 +3 -1 +5
6) C -20M +10) ( -14M +7) ( -16H +3)
LEVEL 4
+ 3 +3
REGION  07  STATE   28   NEBRASKA
                                      REP ORG   003  LAB  435002

                          -PROBABILITY LIMITS	
 POL.CD.
AUDITS
 LEVEL 1
LOU    UP
 LEVEL 2
LOU    UP
 LEVEL 3
LOU    UP
 LEVEL 4
LOU    UP
              **  DATA  FOR COMPARISON UAS UNAVAILABLE **
                                                (continued)
                                   F-125
-------
                           TABLE F-2  (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  AGENCY    EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING  SYSTEM

            COMPARISON  REPORT  OF  2ADHS ACCURACY AUDITS £ PARS
DATE 11/17/86               DATA SELECTED FOR YEAR 1985          PAGE NO.
REGION  08  STATE   06   COLORADO                   REP ORG  001   LAB   344001
 POL.CD.    AUDITS      LEVEL  1        LEVEL 2       LEVEL 3        LEVEL 4
                       LOW     UP     LOW    UP     LOW    UP      LOW    UP

C42401 S02      8       -3     +7      -7    +2      -8    + 3
   PARS     (   7)   (  -30H +13)   C -23)( +13)  ( -20M  +6)
REGION  08  STATE   27   MONTANA                   REP ORG   001   LAB  339001

                       	PROBABILITY LIMITS	

 POL.CD.    AUDITS      LEVEL 1       LEVEL 2       LEVEL  3       LEVEL 4
                       LOW    UP     LOW    UP     LOW     UP      LOW    UP

C42401 S02      20      -43   +35     -26   +17     -24   +13
   PARS     (   24)   (  -32)(  +19)  ( -22)( +11)   ( -20)(   +8)   ( -20)(  +6)
                                                 (continued)

                                    F-126
-------
                           TABLE F-2 (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY   EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING SYSTEM

             COMPARISON REPORT OF fiADHS ACCURACY  AUDITS  £  PARS
DATE  11/17/86               DATA SELECTED FOR YEAR  1985           PAGE NO.   50
REGION  08   STATE   35  NORTH DAKOTA              REP  ORG   001   LAB  341001

                       	PROBABILITY LIMITS	

 POL.CD.     AUDITS      LEVEL 1       LEVEL 2       LEVEL  3       LEVEL 4
                       LOW    UP     LOW    UP     LOW    UP      LOW    UP

C42401 S02      12       +1   +15      +2    +8      -2  +11
   PARS      (    6)   (   +2)(  +11)  (  -2M +11)   (  -7)C   +8)
REGION  08  STATE   46   UTAH                      REP ORG   001   LAB  340001

                       	PROBABILITY LIMITS	

 POL.CD.    AUDITS      LEVEL 1        LEVEL 2       LEVEL  3        LEVEL 4
                       LOW    UP     LOW    UP     LOW     UP      LOW    UP

C42401 S02      18       +1    +5      -1    +5      -4     +5
   PARS     (   38)   (  -11)C  +&)   (   -9)(  +7)  (  -9K   +6)   (   -8K   +7)
                                               (continued)
                                  F-127
-------
                           TABLE  F-2 (Continued)
EKVIROHMEKTAL PROTECTION  AGENCY   EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY  REPORTING SYSTEM
            COMPARISON  REPORT  OF 2ADHS ACCURACY AUDITS &  PARS
DATE 11/17x86
               DATA SELECTED  FOR  YEAR 1985
                                           PAGE NO.
                                        51
REGION  09  STATE   03   ARIZONA
                                      REP ORG  100  LAB   347001
POL. CD. AUDITS

C42401 S02 20
PARS ( 18)
LEVE]
LOU
-16
( -21H
b 1
UP
+ 18
+2)
	 rKUBABJ.XiJ.X
LEVEL 2
LOU UP
-9 +9
( -16H +«*)
i Xij.nj.xd 	
LEVEL 3
LOU UP
-5 +8
( -7)( +3) l
LEVEL 4
LOU UP
-8 +9
t -9)( +9)
REGION  09  STATE   03   ARIZONA
                                      REP ORG

                          •PROBABILITY LIMITS-
                                     200  LAB  447001
 POL.CD.
AUDITS
 LEVEL 1
LOU    UP
 LEVEL 2
LOU    UP
 LEVEL 3
LOU    UP
 LEVEL 4
LOU    UP
              **  DATA  FOR COMPARISON HAS UNAVAILABLE  **
                                                 (continued)
                                    F-128
-------
                            TABLE F-2 (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                       EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY  REPORTING SYSTEM
            COMPARISON REPORT OF BADHS ACCURACY  AUDITS £ PARS
DATE 11/17/86
                DATA  SELECTED FOR YEAR  1985
                                           PAGE  NO.
                                        52
REGION  09  STATE   03   ARIZONA
 POL.CD.
AUDITS
 IEVEL 1
LOW    UP
                                      REP ORG

                          •PROBABILITY LIMITS-
                                     300  LAB   447002
 LEVEL 2
LOU    UP
                                        LEVEL 3
                                       LOW    UP
             **  DATA  FOR COMPARISON WAS UNAVAILABLE **
                 LEVEL  4
                LOU     UP
REGION  09  STATE   05   CALIFORNIA
 POL.CD.
C42401 S02
   PARS
AUDITS
 LEVEL 1
LOU    UP
    4      -8
<  26)  ( -2GK
                  -8
                                      REP ORG   001   LAB  345001

                          -PROBABILITY LIMITS	
 LEVEL 2
LOU    UP
 -7
-15M
                      -6
   LEVEL 3
  LOU    UP

   -7    -7
(  -17M +10)
                                                       LEVEL 4
                                                      LOU    UP
                                                (continued)
                                   F-129
-------
                           TABLE  F-2 (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  AGENCY    EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING  SYSTEM

            COMPARISON REPORT  OF  2ADHS ACCURACY AUDITS £ PARS
DATE 11/17/86               DATA SELECTED FOR YEAR 1985           PAGE NO.    53
REGION  09  STATE  05   CALIFORNIA                REP ORG  004   LAB   445001

                       	PROBABILITY LIMITS	

 POL.CD.    AUDITS      LEVEL  1        LEVEL 2       LEVEL 3        LEVEL  4
                       LOW    UP     LOW    UP     LOW    UP      LOW     UP

C42401 S02      4                     -1-1
   PARS     (  20)   (   -6H +14)   (   -5)( +12)  C  -5)( +11)   (   -2)(   +3)
REGION  09  STATE   05   CALIFORNIA                REP ORG   036   LAB   445003

                       	PROBABILITY LIMITS	

 POL.CD.    AUDITS      LEVEL 1        LEVEL 2       LEVEL  3       LEVEL 4
                       LOW    UP     LOW    UP     LOW     UP      LOW    UP

C42401 S02      20      -29   + 26     -11   +12     -12   +18
   PARS     (    9)   (  -15H  +24)  (  -6H +17)  (  -4)C +16)
                                                 (continued)

                                    F-130
-------
                           TABLE F-2  (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY
                       EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING SYSTEM
            COMPARISON REPORT OF 2ADHS ACCURACY  AUDITS £ PARS
DATE 11/17/86
                DATA SELECTED FOR YEAR  1985
                                            PAGE NO.
REGION  09  STATE   05  CALIFORNIA
 POL.CD.    AUDITS
                                      REP  ORG   061   LAB  445002
LEVEL 1
LOU UP
LEVEL 2
LOU UP
LI Ii-Lnxia 	
LEVEL 3
LOU UP
LEVEL 4
LOU UP
             **  DATA FOR COMPARISON UAS UNAVAILABLE **
REGION  09  STATE   12   HAUAII
                                      REP  ORG   120  LAB  348001

                          -PROBABILITY LIMITS	
 POL.CD.
AUDITS
 LEVEL 1
LOU    UP
 LEVEL 2
LOU    UP
 LEVEL 3
LOU    UP
 LEVEL 4
LOU    UP
             ** DATA  FOR COMPARISON UAS UNAVAILABLE **
                                                (continued)
                                   F-131
-------
                           TABLE F-2 (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  AGENCY    EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING  SYSTEM
            COMPARISON  REPORT  OF  OADHS ACCURACY AUDITS £ PARS
DATE 11/17/86
       DATA SELECTED FOR YEAR  1985
                                                                  PAGE NO.
                                                                             55
REGION  10  STATE   13   IDAHO
                                                  REP ORG  001   LAB   354001
 POL. CD.    AUDITS
LEVEL 1
LOU UP
	 f KUBABX.LXJ
LEVEL 2
LOU UP
n ijJ.nj.ra 	
LEVEL 3
LOU UP
LEVEL 4
LOU UP
             ** DATA FOR  COMPARISON UAS UNAVAILABLE **
REGION  10  STATE   38   OREGON
 POL. CD.
C42401 S02
   PARS
            AUDITS
                 4
                 7)
                        LEVEL  1
                      LOU     UP
                                                  REP ORG   001   LAB  353001
                                      -PROBABILITY
                 LEVEL 2
                LOU    UP
                                                    LEVEL  3
                                                   LOU     UP
   +8    +8     -14   -12
(  -12H  +5)  ( -10H  +8)
                                                    -20
                                                  (  -11
                                                          -20
                                                           +6)
 LEVEL 4
LOU    UP
                                                 (continued)
                                    F-132
-------
                           TABLE F-2 (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY
                       EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING SYSTEM
            COMPARISON REPORT OF 2ADHS  ACCURACY AUDITS £ PARS
DATE 11/17/86               DATA SELECTED  FOR YEAR 1985
                                                      PAGE NO.
56
REUICN
                                       REP  ORG  001  LAB  352001
 POL.CD.
   PARS
AUDITS
C  23)
LEVEL
LOU
-«»
-10K
1
UP
-«*
+ 9)
— — 	 fK.ua
LEVEL
LOU
-5
( -"-ion
ABJ.J.J.
2
UP
-3
+ 10)
ii jjj.nj.r2>-
LEVEL
LOU
-3
( -11X •(
3
UP
-7.
HO )
LEVEL H
LOU UP

f -IHM +11
                                                (continued)
                                   F-133
-------
                           TABLE F-2 (Continued)

                  EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY REPORTING SYSTEM

             COMPARISON REPORT OF QADHS ACCURACY AUDITS & PARS
                        DATA SELECTED FOR YEAR 1985

                              REGIONAL SUMMARY
REGION
        AUDITS
               LEVEL 1
              LOW     UP
POL. CD. C42401  S02
01


02


03


04


05


06


07


08


09


10
PA
PARS

PA
PARS

PA
PARS

PA
PARS

PA
PARS

PA
PARS

PA
PARS

PA
PARS

PA
PARS

PA
PARS
 24
 55

 20
235

 97
148

160
310

179
208

100
137

 62
 55

 58
 75

 48
 73

  8
 30
 -9
 -9

-14
-12

 -5
-13

-28
-18

-17
-17

-19
-22

-15
-17

-23
-22

-22
-19

-11
-11
12
 6

30
13

16
 9

31
12

23
16

22
16

33
15

26
15

20
16

15
 8
no 11.1 i i
LEVEL
LOW
-5
-8
-5
-10
-2
-10
-22
-12
-10
-16
-28
-17
-19
-12
-15
-16
-10
-14
-18
-10
i u i ri i i o
2
UP
4
6
16
11
11
9
24
9
12
17
39
13
29
12
14
11
10
12
1
9
LEVEL
LOW
-5
-8
0
-10
-3
-10
-25
-12
-10
-16
-22
-15
-21
-14
-15
-15
-10
-12
-29
-11
3
UP
5
7
12
12
11
8
24
9
12
17
32
13
27
10
13
8
13
12
6
9
                                                                 (continued)
                                    F-134
-------
                            TABLE F-2  (Continued)

                   EMSL PRECISION/ACCURACY  REPORTING SYSTEM

              COMPARISON REPORT OF QADHS  ACCURACY AUDITS & PARS
                         DATA SELECTED  FOR  YEAR 1985

                               NATIONAL AVERAGES

                             	PROBABILITY LIMITS-
POL. CD.
AUDITS
C42401  S02
   PA           756
   PARS        1326
 LEVEL 1
LOW     UP
                -20
                -17
        26
        14
 LEVEL 2
LOW     UP
-18
-13
22
12
           LEVEL  3
          LOW     UP
-17
-13
20
12
                                     F-135
                                                      4 US QOVERNMENTPRINTINGOFFICE.1987 - 748-121/40716
-------