United States
             Environmental Protection
             Agency
            Great Lakes National
            Program Office,, ° -
            536 South Clark Street
            Chicago, Illinois 60605
EPA-905/9-84-001
February 1984
4>EPA
An Experimental Study
Of Lake Loading by
Aerosol Transport and
Dry Deposition  in the
Lake Erie Basin

-------
                                                  EPA-905/2-84-002
                                                  June 1984
     AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF LAKE LOADING
   BY AEROSOL TRANSPORT AND DRY DEPOSITION IN
              THE LAKE ERIE BASIN
H. Sievering, D.A. Dolske, V.  Jensen, R.L. Huges
         Environmental  Science Program
          College of Applied Sciences
           Governors State University
        University Park, Illinois  60466
       Project Officer:   C.  Risley,  Chief
        Surveillance and Research Staff
      U.S.  Environmental Protection  Agency
      GREAT LAKES NATIONAL PROGRAM OFFICE
                    REGION V
      U.S.  ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
             536 South Clark Street
            Chicago, Illinois  60605

-------
                                FOREWORD
This study was supported by a Great Lakes National  Program grant to
Governors State University for investigating the rate of deposition
of atmospheric transported pollutants to Lake Erie.   The R/V Carson,
a laboratory and lake water quality sampling ship,  operated by this
office, was used to support this project.  Data in  this  report covers
a period from June 1979 to July 1982.

-------
                                 DISCLAIMER
     This report has been reviewed by the Great Lakes National  Program
Office, Region V, U.S. Environmental  Protection Agency, and approved far
publication.  Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily
reflect the views and policies of the U.S. Environmental  Protection
Agency, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products  constitute
endorsement or recommendation for use.

-------
                          EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

     A Lake Erie experimental  program to assess the contribution of
atmospheric dry loading of aerosol  trace elements  and nutrients  has
been completed.  Trace elemental  concentrations were determined  by
atomic emission spectroscopy for seventeen elements.  Nutrient species
phosphate and sulfate were determined by standard  USEPA techniques.
     The Lake Erie sampling program was successful, despite generally
poor weather conditions.  However,  any attempt to  calculate atmospheric
dry loading must be viewed with skepticism.  The very fact that  unusual
weather conditions prevailed during at least two of the three Lake Erie
ship outings means that the data base is not climatologically
representative.  Neither the aerosol elemental concentrations nor
the wind speed and direction data are sufficiently representative
to allow use of the Lake Michigan "binning" procedure (EPA-905/4-79-
016).  For example, no high wind speeds (i.e., greater than 10 m s~ )
or thermally unstable conditions were encountered.  Southwesterly
flow from the Cleveland source region was severely under-represented.
Also confounding, though, is the fact that rains (often times heavy)
and, therefore, wet soil/surface conditions prevailed during the Lake
Erie sampling program.  These conditions caused the aerosol concentrations
for soil-derived elements (e.g., Iron) to be more  than one order-of-
magnitude lower over Lake Erie than over Lake Michigan.  These "rainy"
conditions must also have affected anthropogenic source elemental
(Pb, Zn, Cd, Cu, Cr, Ni--see Table next page for explanation of
symbols) concentrations.  Yet the observed Zn, Cd, Cu, Cr, and Ni
ambient air concentrations are comparable to previous measurements
in the northeastern U.S.  This, and the fact that Zn, Cd, Cu, Cr,
and Ni are suspected to be near to toxic levels in Lake Erie waters,
provoked the calculation of atmospheric loadings below--presented in
                        3      -1
metric tons per year (10  kg yr~ ).  Results are shown along with
revised estimates for the southern basin of Lake .Michigan  (EPA-905/4-
79-016).
                                   m

-------
The range in values shown may be considered to be the  ^25% a^d
confidence limits in the estimation of mean loadings.  The full range
of uncertainty may be more than  an order of magnitude.  Thus, these
loading numbers must be "viewed with skenticisn" as stated above.
                 ATMOSPHERIC DRY LOADING, 103 kg yr"1
Element
Iron
Lead
Zinc
Cadmium
Copper
Chromium
Nickel
Sulfate
Phosphorus
(Tnt.?l-P)

(Fe)
(Pb)
(Zn)
(Cd)
(Cu)
(Cr)
(Ni)
(soj)

Lake Erie
170-330**
10-25
120-300
8-20
15-50
8-18
5-15
20-50x1 O3
< ]o**
Southern Basin
Lake Michigan
350-850
200-500
70-200
—
(10-20)*
—
—
3.5-llxlO3
75-150
Percentage Anthropogenic
Lake Erie Lake Michigan
>75 >65
>95 95
>97 >75
>99
%n5 (?)*
>80
^90
__

     A
      Parens indicate dubious nature of Lake Michigan Cu data because of
sampling contamination.
    **
      Low due to depleted soil  source during Lake Erie sampling program.

     A first point to notice is that numbers for Cd, Cu, Cr, and Ni  are
available for Lake Erie but not for Lake Michigan.  This is the result
of improved analytical  detection limits as well  as the fact that average
sampling times over Lake Erie were nearly twice  as long as over Lake
Michigan.  The Fe and total-P Lake Erie loadings are three- to ten-fold
lower than for Lake Michigan because of the markedly depleted soil  source,
                                    IV

-------
These two loading figures  are  certainly  unrepresentatively  low  estimates.
The Pb, Cr, and Ni  loading estimates  may also  be  unrepresentatively  low.
                                                                       3
(A previous Lake Erie dry  loading estimate  [IJC,  1977]  for  Pb is  600x10
kg yr~ ; this value may be an  over-estimate.)   Clearly  Pb loading, primarily
from automotive and other  combustion  sources,  is  reduced relative  to that
for the southern basin of  Lake Michigan, even  considering the order-of-
magnitude potential uncertainty.   In  light  of  this,  the estimated  Zn
loading to Lake Erie is surprisingly  large. Considering the large
uncertainty prevalent, the atmospheric dry  loading of Zn to Lake  Erie
and to the southern basin  of Lake Michigan  are about the same.   In the
case of Lake Michigan, atmospheric Zn dry loading constitutes about  one-third
of the total loading from  dry  and wet deposition  and from runoff  combined.
     One may calculate the relative contribution  of  the soil- and  lake-
derived natural aerosol sources versus anthropogenic aerosol sources,
on the assumption that all sources other than  soil and lakes are
anthropogenic.  Results of this calculation are shown in the last
two columns of the table.   Since the  percentage of anthropogenic  Pb,
Cd, and Cu is comparable to that for  Zn, it is suggested that a
substantial percentage—at least 10% to as  much as 50%--of  the  total
Lake Erie loading for these elements  may be due to dry deposition.
However, before any comparisons with  wet deposition  and runoff  are
considered valid, a larger Lake Erie  aerosol data base must be  obtained.
For  Zn and Cu alone it is  estimated that 30 to 50% of their atmospheric
dry  loading may occur during high wind speeds  (i.e., greater than
10 m s~^).  Yet no data were obtained during such conditions nor during
thermally unstable conditions  (which prevail in winter months).  It
is also  impossible to use the  combined Lakes Erie and Michigan  data
base  to  further estimate  loadings for others of the  Great  Lakes.
      Given the  difficulty in obtaining loading estimates  for Lake Erie
a  second look at the  Lake Michigan data base was  undertaken.  In particular,
the  chemical element  balance  (CEB) approach was used to evaluate the
percentage contribution to over-Lake Michigan aerosol mass  by  each of
seven  source  types:  the lake  itself, soil,  surface excavation   (e.g., rock
quarrying),  iron/steel manufacturing, residential oil-burning,  coal-
burning  and  automobile combustion.   It was  found  that  the   lake  may  be
a  large  contributor  to the total  aerosol mass observed overlake although

-------
neither of the natural  lake or soil  sources  is  a  major  contributor  to
the trace elements Cd,  Pb, or Zn  mentioned  above.
     The final area of research during this  Lake  Erie Grant  program
was an effort to better parameterize  aerosol  deposition at the  air/water
interface.  During the  Lake Michigan  Grant  program a simple  estimate of
the deposition velocity (v,) at the  air/water interface was  made  by
assuming it to be a product of wind  speed and the drag  coefficient.
One way to obtain a better parameterization  is  by estimating v, as  a
function of smooth, moderate, and rough  flow  conditions at the  air/water
interface.  Consideration of these three distinct flow  regimes  results
in an average v, about  half the value previously  used.   As a consequence,
the range in previously reported  Lake Michigan  loading  values  is  nearly
one-half of that reported in EPA-905/4-79-016 .   This approximately
twofold reduction is reflected in the Lake  Michigan southern basin
loadings shown in the table in this  Executive Summary.
                                   VI

-------
                               CONTENTS

                                                                      Page
Executive Summary	^^
List of Figures	vjii
List of Tables	.jx
     1 .  Introduction	   ]
     2.  Conclusions and Recommendations 	   5
     3.  Description of Experimental Program 	   7
         3.1   Theory and Design	   7
         3.2  Execution of the Sampling Program	15
     4.  Data, Analysis, and Basic Results	-  ig
         4.1   Aerosol Elemental Data	19
         4.2  Deposition Velocity Parameterization 	
     5.  Interpretation of Results  	  35
         5.1   Ship/Buoy Meteorological  Data Intercomparison
              and the Representativeness of Ship Sampling	35
         5.?  Aerosol Characteristics and the Estimation of
              Atmospheric Dry Loading	40
         5.3  Natural and Anthropogenic Source Contributions to
              Great Lakes Atmospheric Dry Loading and the Future of
              Atmospheric Loading Estimates	43
References	51
Appendices
A.  Lake Breeze Effects on Particle Size Spectra and Sulfate
    Concentration over Lake Michigan	53
B.  Chemical  Uniformity of Atmospheric Aerosol :  Its Violation at a
    Mid-Lake Erie Site	on
C.  Technical Note:  Trace-Element Pass-Through for Cellulose
    Impactor Substrates and Filters When Used for Aerosol Collection .  96
D.  Chemical  Elements in Atmospheric Aerosol  Over Southern Lake
    Michigan: The Contribution of the Lake Source	-IQO
E.  Some Effects  of Wind-Shift on Over-Lake Turbulence and Aerosol
    Deposition	138

                                  vii

-------
                             LIST OF FIGURES
Number                                                              Page
 1.   Data Collection Areas for GALE, 1979-1980 	   3
 2.   Location of R/V Rachel  Carson and CCIW Buoys	   9
 3.   R/V Simons and Sampling Boom	11
 4.   Aerosol  Trajectory Plot, Source Region Overlake 	  23
 5.   Aerosol  Trajectory Plot, Cleveland Area Source Region 	  24
 6.   Summary of 1979 Plotted Trajectories, End-Point is Most Likely
     Location 24-hr Back in  Time	25
 7.   Aerosol  Volume Distribution Plot for Overlake Trajectory Case .  £8
 8.   Aerosol  Volume Distribution Plot for Cleveland Source Region
     Trajectory Case	29
 9.   Diagrammatic Representation of the Surface Layer Above the
     Air-Water Interface:  (a) Smooth flow, (b) Rough flow	31
10.   Cumulative Frequency Plot of Ship-sampled and Lakes Erie and
     Michigan C1imatological  Wind Speed Conditions 	  39
                                  VI

-------
                            LIST OF TABLES


Number                                                               Page


  1.   ICAP Blanks,  Detection Limits and  Typical  Sample  (yg  1~  )  .  .  .   20


  2.   Mid-Lake Erie Aerosol, GALE 1979 Sets	21

                                                         _3
  3.   Geometric Mean Concentrations, GALE 1979 Sets,  ng m   	   26


  4.   Parameterization of Deposition Velocity, v ,  	   34


  5.   ^ass Balance  Estimate  for Lake Erie	47

-------
                               SECTION 1
                             INTRODUCTION

     The U.S.-Canada Agreement on the Great Lakes has, in the past
few years, stimulated research into the relationship between regional
air pollution and the lakes' water quality.  A part of the USEPA
effort in this regard has been grant funding, through the Great Lakes
National Program Office  (GLNPO), of studies addressing various aspects
of atmospheric-route loading.  Projected  future shoreline and inland
population gains, industrial development, and energy producing facilities
make the atmospheric route a critically important element in the
overall problem of Great Lakes pollution  loading.  The region
encompasses several  intense urban-industrial air pollution source
areas.  Prevailing winds often carry anthropogenic particles and gases
out over the lakes.   A real potential  exists for serious  detrimental
effects on Great Lakes water quality.
     In order to achieve accurate estimates of atmospheric-route
loadings, the processes of wet and dry deposition are probably best
considered separately.  Bulk (wet plus dry) sampling presently gives
no better than an order-of-magnitude accuracy in the dry  loading
estimation.  Regarding small particles (the vast majority of anthropogenic
particles are small  particles), sampling  techniques that  simulate
natural-surface particle collection efficiency do not yet exist.  Wet
deposition loadings  have been reliably known for years.   And, dry
deposition loadings  had been considered negligible until  early modelling
estimates suggested  dry loadings  could be substantial  (Winchester and
Nifong, 1971; Gatz,  1975; Sievering, 1975).  A lack of knowledge
regarding temporal  variability in ambient aerosol  concentration and
deposition rate pointed out the need for  environmental  (field)
sampling as a means  of decreasing the  uncertainty in estimates of the
dry deposition loading rate.  During a 1976-1979 study by Governors
State University (GSU) aerosol  and meteoological  data were collected
over mid-Lake Michigan (Sievering et al., 1979).   Aerosol  concentrations
and deposition rates were found to be  strongly dependent  on surface
layer meteorological conditions.   The  uncertainty in estimates of dry  *

-------
                                   2
deposition loadings for Lake Michigan was reduced; however,  the
applicability of the conclusions of that study to the other  Great
Lakes remained in question.  This present work was funded in 1979
by USEPA-GLNPO, to complement and extend the results  of the  earlier
Lake Michigan work by GSU.  A sampling program using  identical or
compatible methods was carried out during the summer  of 1979 on
Lake Erie.  Ultimately, the conclusions of this work, in conjunction
with Lake Michigan results and those obtained from the Great Lakes
Atmospheric Deposition (GLAD) network, should lead to a more generalized
understanding of aerosol  transport and deposition in  the Great Lakes
region, as well as a better estimation of atmospheric-route  Great
Lakes pollution loading.
     The principal objectives of the present work on  Lake Erie were
to obtain an overlake data base and to relate aerosol chemical
constituent loadings to climatologically-expected meteorological
conditions over Lake Erie..  In order to approach these objectives, a
data collection program was devised that covered a wide range of
spatial and temporal scales—see Figure 1.  Aerosol monitoring, at
the smallest space scales, included Active Scattering Aerosol
Spectrometer (ASAS) aerosol number concentrations, condensation nuclei
counter (CNC) number concentrations, and integrating  nephelometer  (IN)
back scattering coefficient.  Hi-volume samplers collected particles
during filter exposures which averaged about six hours.  Cascase
impactors and several types of filter material were used to  provide
appropriate media for the several chemical analyses that were done.
A separate pass-through experiment using hi-volume air sampling at
GSU and the 68th Street Crib near Chicago was performed during 1980
in order to determine the percentage of Pb, Zn, and Fe lost  (passed
through) by hi-volume filter sampling.  Results of the pass-through
experiment (PTE) are used to correct trace metal concentration data
obtained during Lake Erie hi-volume air sampling  and, also, Lake
Michigan sampling.
     A second major data  collection thrust was meteorological in
character.  Micrometeorological information was collected and processed
by GSU.  Larger space- and time-scale meteorological  data were obtained

-------
Space
Scale, meters
                10
                10
                10
                io-24
             ASAS--Active Scattering Aerosol  Spectrometer
              CNC—Condensation nouclei  counter
               IN--Integrating Nephelometer
               v .--Deposition velocity


                                     Synoptic Meteorology
                                     & Lake Erie Climatology
                                                     f1e?ometeorology
         Micrometeorology
                          Air-Water Interface
                          v, dynamics
                                            IN
     CNC
                           AS AS
                             Hi-Volume Sampling
                                                          Pas's-through  Experiment
                      10
                        -2
10
  -1
                     1        10        ItT       10J

                         Time  Scale,  minutes

Figure  1.   Data  Collection  areas  for  GALE, 1 979-1 980,
10

-------
from the U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) and National  Weather Service (NWS)
stations around the lake, Canada Centre for Inland Waters (CCIW)
Lake Erie buoys, and Atmospheric Environment Service (AES) shore
stations.  Correction and reduction of the raw meteorological data
was performed at GSU.  Climatological  data were obtained from the
National  Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA Summary of
Synoptic Meteorol.  Obser. for Great Lakes Areas, 1975).
     Information collected at each of these scales (Figure 1) is
necessary to expand our understanding of the complex aerosol transport
and deposition processes that occur over the lake.  Chemical
characterization of the aerosol, construction  of backtrajectory plots,
calculation of estimated deposition velocities, and the  relation
of those factors to Lake Erie Climatological data ultimately approach
the objectives of this study.

-------
                                  5
                               SECTION 2
                    CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

     The loading of Great Lakes'  waters by air pollutants  is an
extremely difficult process to thoroughly understand on qualitative
grounds let alone to establish quantitatively.  Yet, a number of
conclusions can be drawn from this Lake Erie study:
1.  Single point (shipboard) over lake sampling can be made to
    be representative of an entire Great Lake's meteorological
    conditions to better than ± 15% accuracy.
2.  Insufficient aerosol elemental and compound data were  obtained
    over Lake Erie to afford the detailed calculation of loading
    estimates by the procedure used in the Lake Michigan study
    (EPA-905/4-79-016).  However, rough estimates of Cu, Zn, Cd,
    Cr, and Ni loadings are warranted given their potential for
    negative ecological impact.
3.  Extrapolation and interpolation of Lake Michigan or Lake Erie
    aerosol elemental concentrations to others of the Great Lakes
    is not warranted.  Long-range aerosol transport nay veil  have
    markedly changed the absolute as well as relative concentrations
    of trace elements over Lake Erie.  It would be better  to monitor
    the anthropogenic contribution to Great Lakes'  loading at a site
    not dominated by long-range transport that is, yet, representative
    of overlake conditions on the Great Lakes.  These conditions
    were met at the midlake site on southern Lake Michigan but not
    by the mid-Lake Erie nor the Lake Michigan nearshore (water
    intake crib) site sampling.
4.  In light of 3, the Lake Michigan data have been reconsidered to
    review lake effects upon aerosol transport and, especially, trace
    element concentrations.  This reconsideration of Lake  Michigan
    concentrations has also included the determination of  aerosol  losses
    in the sampling apparatus used over Lake Michigan to then arrive at
    revised atmosphere dry "fading estimates  for Lake Michigan.

-------
Anthropogenic, soil and lake source contributions to over Lake
Michigan aerosol  concentrations have been preliminarily specified
by using a chemical element balance technique.   Results indicate
an unexpectedly large lake source contribution  to the total  aerosol
mass.  This was found to be true for both fine  and coarse aerosol
particulate matter.  However, the contribution  of steel manufacturing
and surface mining industries and of coal burning and the automobile
were by no means  insignificant.  In fact, anthropogenic contributions
(in parens)--at the Lake Michigan nearshore site were found  to  be:
Pb (99%), Zn  (95%), and Mn (90%).  It would appear that an intensive
aerosol sampling, multi-element analysis and, especially, a
multivariate statistical interpretation  (including uncertainty)--in
concert with a detailed meteorological/climatological assessment--
may best ultimately unravel anthropogenic versus natural loadings.
More important, anthropogenic contributions by source type to
overlake aerosol  concentrations (with < 50% uncertainty) may result.
The accurate determination of loadings to any of the Great Lakes
must await a reasonably accurate parameterization of aerosol
deposition velocities (v.) as-a function of aerosol particle
size (or chemical element), of wind speed and direction, of
thermal stability and of temporal or spatial changes in these
parameters.  Our understanding of over-water v, dependence on these
parameters is extremely limited and warrants the consideration of
research specifically designed to determine these dependencies.

-------
                               SECTION 3
                  DESCRIPTION OF EXPERIMENTAL
3.1  THEORY AND DESIGN
     In order to illustrate the basic concepts and data-collection
requirements of the experiment, the simple relation
                              F = vd .  C                              (1)
may be used.  F is the mass flux of particles  to the lake surface
(kg m"^ s ~^), v, is the deposition velocity (m s  ), and C is  the
                   -3
concentration (kg m" ) of particles in  air near the surface.   Note
that both v, and C are complicated functions of many environmental
factors, as discussed further in this report.   However, equation 1
does show that there are two main areas to investigate when estimating F.
     Particle and interface physics and micrometeorological  factors
enter into the determination of v,; aerosol  .chemical  transformations
and the mechanics of particle transport downwind of source regions
affect the determination of C.  Finally, the climatological  record
is used to normalize the temporal variability in F to expected  mean
annual conditions, yielding annual total dry deposition loading
estimates.  Overlake climatology is thus an  important -factor in the
determination of annual  loading rates (see Section 5.1).   In order
to relate the limited number of sampling hours (approximately two
percent of the year) to  the annual total loading, data sets taken in
periods of similar surface layer conditions  are computationally grouped
into "bins."a  Each bin is defined by a  range of values for one  of
three parameters: thermal stability, wind speed and source region,
the last identified through back-trajectory  analysis.  For each of
the j bins the annual frequency of occurrence, f , is determined for
the range of the defining parameters.  The climatological  denendence
of v, and C are then calculated from: the NOAA Summary of Synoptic
Meteorological Observations for Great Lakes  Areas (NOAA,  1975).

-------
     Annual  Dry Loading = E vd1  .  C.  .  f .  .  A .  -^7—               (2)
                          j   ^                   j   oj
where: v ,.  is the mean v, for aerosol  data  sets  in  the jth
        dj               d
       bin  (m s~'); aerosol (chemical  constituent)
       C. is the mean aerosol  (chemical  constituent) concentration
                                          1
       for  data sets in the jth  bin (kg m~6};
       f .  is the annual frequency of occurrence  for the defining
       range of the three parameters—thermal stability, wind
       speed and source region;
       A is the total water surface area of the  Lake Erie basin
       (m2);
and    t is that part of the year when no precipitation occurs
       overlake (s yr~').
Further discussion of basic concepts of the experimental program may
be found in the final report of the 1976-1979 Lake Michigan study
(Sievering et al., 1979).
      Meteorological data were collected from several U.S. and Canadian
shoreline stations and  buoys in Lake Erie.   These data were used
extensively in  the construction of aerosol  back-trajectories, by the
methods of Sievering et  al.  (1979).  In conjunction with climatological
information  (NOAA, 1975),  an attempt was made to estimate the representa-
tiveness of the year 1979  and the limited sampling periods.  The
meteorological  data  used were:  Canadian climatological  station data
for  Long Point  and  Port Col borne, Ontario; Canadian surface data  for
London  and  Dimcoe, Ontario;  three Lake  Erie  CCIW buoy  locations:  Buoy #1
 (42° 07' 42"  N, 81°  28'  42"  W), buoy #2  (42°  3R1 45"  N,  79° 56' 15" H),
buoy #3  (41°  44'  25", N, 82°  27' 04" W)--see  Figure  2;  meteorological  data
from ship outings  qf the C.S.S. Limnos.
      NWS surface  meteorological data were  for Erie,  PA,  Flint,  MI,  and
Cleveland,  OH;  airport surface meteorological data  for Burke  Lakefront
Tower,  Cleveland, OH,  Pittsburgh  International Airport,  Buffalo  Inter-
 national Airport, and Toledo Express  Airport; Coast Guard Marine  Weather
 Log  for Ashtabula Light Station,  OH  covering the  dates of the  Lake  Erie
 cruises, July 22-28, Sept. 4-8,  and  October  16-20,  1979.  We  also obtained
 upper air  soundings from the NWS  stations  at Buffalo, NY, Dayton, OH,
 Flint,  141,  and Pittsburgh, PA.

-------
              Pomte-aux-Pins
                    CCIW #1
                       A
                       +R/V

                      CARSON
                                  /  l
                                                                        40°
9  I
          f D / \/ D a /- ho 1 - Ta
                           I/ m MMT n -F Tl Q \/Q 1 a n H f/19°nn'Ni Ql ° TH ' l,| \  3 n rl rril.l Kuni/c AT

-------
                                  10
     Micrometeorological  data  and  aerosol  samples  were  collected  from
aboard the USEPA's R/V Rachel  Carson,  anchored  on  station at  42°  00' N,
81° 30'  W (Figure 2).   This  station is 55  km NNE of Cleveland,  OH in
the central  basin of the  lake, 2 to 5  km south  of  primary shipping
lanes, and 42 km SE of Pointe  aux  Pins, Ontario.   Thus,  the sampling
site was removed from major  aerosol sources  on  shore,  and upwind  of
the local (ship traffic)  sources for a large percentage  of on-station
sampling time.   The midlake  sampling site  has the  advantages  of:
micrometeorological conditions that are representative  of a large
part of the lake's surface,  long over water upwind  fetches that  enhance
the likelihood that steady-state surface layer  conditions prevail,
and well-mixed aerosol populations in  which  no  single  anthropogenic
source or pollution event is likely to dominate.   If the lake surface
appears constant to the air  passing over it, the mass  flux,  F,  within
a well-developed surface  layer is  very likely to  be constant  throughout
the vertical extent of that  surface layer (Kraft,  1977).
     To ensure that aerosol  samples and meteorological  data were  not
contaminated by the presence of the ship itself,  all sampling was done
in a bow-anchored mode.  In  that configuration, the ship faced bow-first
into the wind, ± 15°.  An open-beam lightweight aluminum boom extended
6 m ahead of the bow, at approx. 5 m above the  mean water level
(Figure 3).  Meteorological  sensors were placed at the forward
end of the boom.   Studies of bluff-body turbulence effects
by Hunt and Mulhearn  (1973)  indicate that the 6 m boom was  sufficiently
long to avoid turbulence effects due to the ship structure.   Turbulence
intensity, I, = a /u,  where u is  the running mean of wind  speed  and
             u    u
a  is the standard deviation about the mean, measured at the  forward
tip of the boom, ranged from 0.05  to 0.18, with a  mean value  of 0.11.
This is  comparable to the 0.02 to  0.14 observed by SethuRaman and
Tichler  (1977) from an air-sea interaction tower.   Thus, very little
increased turbulence  was observed  at the boom tip.
     Two  hi-volume air samplers were located on the boom,  aft of the
meteorological sensors.  The  hi-vols were 3 and 4 m ahead of the ship's
bow.  The filter holders and  heads were silicone-rubber sealed to the

-------
FIGURE 3: R/V Simons and Sampling Boom

-------
                                  12

pump motors.   The pump exhausts  were vented  through  4-m  long,  11-cm
diameter plastic hoses which  hung  below the  boom.  This  was  done  to
prevent re-entrainment of the exhaust and contamination  of aerosol
samples.  All  hi-volume sampling was conducted  either  bow-anchored
on station or, occasionally,  while underway  upwind.  The possibility
of contamination by the ship's diesel generator and  engine exhausts
was minimized.  Whenever local wind direction (WD) shifted quickly
to the point where the ship did not remain bow-first to  the  wind, hi-vol
sampling was avoided.   Continuous  WD traces  from the boom tip  vane
indicate that the boom remained ±  15° of directly upwind during all
sampling periods.
     Shipboard sampling was performed around the clock.   In  order to
divide the data into manageable time segments,  aerosol  collection was
kept to within 4-to 8-h segments.   Each data set, because of this limited
duration, correpsonds to a period  of constant and readily characterizable
meteorological conditions.  The occurrence of rain intermittently
precluded sampling during one cruise.  At the beginning of each data
set, all aerosol filters and impactors were  replaced and bulk water
samples were collected.  Thus, the samples for chemical  analyses  can
be classified according to values  of meteorological  parameters that
prevailed during each data set.  These results are then further
classified in the context of climatologically expected frequencies-
of-occurrence for those meteorological conditions.
     In general, a minimum of 4-h  elapsed time was used per data set
in order to collect enough material on the hi-vol filters to be above
the detection limits of the chemical analytical procedures.   Past that
minimum, rapid and persistent changes in the 5-m height monitored wind
speed  (Uc), WD, or thermal stability conditions were cause for the
        U
termination of a data set.  Such changes were defined  as two successive
15-minute mean values for any parameter being more than 1 a removed
from the running mean of that parameter.  A maximum time of ^ 8 h was
allowed so that no data set was biased by a widely differing run time.
Aerosol sample preparation and chemical analyses followed the procedures
of Sievering  et al . (1979).

-------
                                  13
     Three optical aerosol  sensors were located at the aft-most end
of the boom.  An Active Scattering Aerosol  Spectrometer (ASAS) monitored
aerosol number concentration in 60 size channels between 0.1  ym and
3.5 urn diameter.  An Integrating Nephelometer (IN) gave a continuous
output of aerosol backscattering coefficient, b   .,  which may be
transformed into a measure of aerosol  mass  (M) concentration  using
the formula b    . = 0.3 + 0.014 M  (Dave' et al ., 1979).  Finally, a
             scat
condensation nuclei counter (CNC) provided  relatively fast-response,
large  increase nuclei count indications of local  aerosol sources
(e.g., passing ships), in addition to monitoring ambient nuclei
number concentrations.
     In addition to the boom-mounted instruments, the forward part of
the foredeck was the site of aerosol sampling.  Two hi-volume samplers
with type A glass fiber filters were run on overlapping schedules to
collect aerosol mass concentration data.  A third hi-vol on the foredeck
was used with membrane filters to collect particles for optical analysis.
     Surface layer thermal  stability conditions were monitored by
detailed measurement of vertical temperature gradients through the use
of an  array of matched and carefully intercalibrated fan-aspirated
composite thermistor probes.  These probes  were mounted on a  light mast
at the bow, 10, 7, and 5 m above mean water level.  The sensors were
referenced to duplicate probes at the 5-m level.  Statistically
significant temperature gradients were observed during some data sets.
Additional points in the vertical temperature gradient were measured
by a hand-held infrared thermometer (IR) and a bucket thermometer.
The IR was used to scan an area of the lake surface below the boom
and, thereby, measure a surface temperature, T .   The bucket  thermometer
measured lake water temperature at Mem depth, T .   The set  and drift
of surface water currents were calculated by observing the movements of
drifters with an optical  rangefinder,  stopwatch, and  hand-bearing compass,
Air movements above the near surface layer  at the ship were crudely
observed during daylight hours by tracking  39-g pibal  (PTE) balloons
with a prism-viewing hand-held compass.

-------
                                  14




     The pass-through experiment (PTE) was  conducted  during  April  to



August, 1980 at Governors State University  and  at the City of Chicago



68th Street water intake crib on Lake Michigan.   The  PTE  was  designed



to estimate, operationally, the overall particle  collection  efficiency



of the modified Sierra 1, 3, 6 impactor using cellulose substrates/filter,



the impactor/filter combination used during all  Lake  Erie and Lake Michigan



sampling.  Meteorological parameters were monitored during sampling, and



continuous detailed records of temperature, relative  humidity,  and b    ,
                                                                   scat


were kept.



     Collection efficiency of the cellulose filter material  for Pb, Fe,



and Zn relative to the standard type A glass fiber filter was determined



by running different multiple-filter assemblies  on two hi-vols.  On the



first hi-vol , a type A glass fiber filter was placed  1 cm above a low-trace-



element content (spectrograde, SG) glass fiber filter. The  type A was



used to gravimetrically find total aerosol  mass  concentration.   The SG



filter was hot acid leached (EPA procedure) and  analyzed  for Pb, Fe, and



Zn by AA.  On the second hi-vol of the simultaneously sampling pair, a



modified Sierra 1, 3, 6 stage cascade impactor was used with cellulose



impaction substrates filter.  An SG filter  was  placed in  line 1 cm



behind the impactor.  All four stages were  prepared for Pb,  Fe, Zn



analysis.



     The collection efficiencies determined here are  relative to the



type A because it is assumed that type A glass  fiber is 100  percent



efficient, i.e., lets no particles pass through.   If this is true, or



nearly so, then the SG backup of a type A should show concentrations



near filter-blank level.  The SG backup behind the less than 100 percent

-------
                                  15





efficient cellulose filter should show concentrations at some level



inversely related to the collection efficiency of the cellulose filter.



Such multi-filter simultaneously collected pairs of filter sets were



run on co-calibrated hi-vols.  Filter exposure was at a flow-controlled



rate of 1.13 m  min~  (40 SCFM) for periods ranging up to 72 h.  This



length of time was required to allow sufficient material  to pass through



to the final SG backup for the chemical  analysis.



3.2  EXECUTION OF THE SAMPLING PROGRAM



     During the summer season, 1979 three cruises were conducted on  Lake



Erie.  The USEPA R/V Rachel Carson anchored on station at 81° 31'  W,



42° 00' N for several  days during each cruise.  A summary of shipboard



sampling activities and description of meteorological  conditions



encountered follows:



     The first cruise began 23 July 1979, with R/V Carson on site at



2300 CDT.   The evening of 23 July 79, a  weak surface front was situated



north of Lake Erie.  This was displaced  to the northeast  with the



movement of an associated low pressure area.  The morning of 24 July 79



was 80 percent overcast.   There was some clearing at mid-morning, and



by 7 PM CDT sky cover was only 50 percent.  Several  episodes of light



rain interrupted sampling the evening of 24 July 79 through the next



morning.   By daybreak on  25 July 79, there was 90 percent cloud cover.



Again, several  episodes of rain occurred during the late  afternoon and



evening of 25 July.  An associated low pressure system moved from



northern Lake Michigan on the morning of 25 July 79 to the Quebec area



by 26 July 79.   This system trailed a cold front which passed through



Lake Erie  sometime earlier on the 26th.   Ahead of the  cold front passage,



there was  an increase  of  wind speed and  the sky was  entirely overcast

-------
                                  16
the morning of 26 July 79.   The sky began clearing 0900 CDT on  26
July 79.  The night was very clear 27 July 79 and no  further sampling
was conducted.
     Of the 78 hours on-site, about 72 hours were devoted to actual
sampling.  Four to 5 hours  of the inactive time was due to periods of
rainfall, during which all  sampling temporarily halted; the remaining
time was used in adjusting equipment and changing Hi-vol  filters.
Results from the aerosol data analysis indicate that the cruise covered
two distinct aerosol regimes.  Early in the cruise, the site was generally
downwind of the Cleveland area and moderate aerosol mass concentrations
(around 40 yg m" ) were encountered.  After passage of a cold front later
in the cruise, the shift in winds brought about much lower aerosol
concentrations, by two-fold.  A total of twelve data sets were collected,
each consisting of size-fractionated aerosol samples for metal  and
nutrient analysis, a bulk water sample, as well as physical aerosol and
meteorological data.
     This cruise period was one of  generally steady, moderate winds in
the range of  3 to 6 m  s  .  Atmospheric temperature stability throughout
the period may be characterized as  neutral to slightly stable,
AT =  (Tai> -  TQ) =  0.1  to 1.5°C.
     The second cruise began 5 Sept  79.   This cruise was  shortened
first  by late arrival  of the ship at  Cleveland and later  by heavy
weather  encountered 7  Sept  79.  The  weather  during the entire
second outing was  influenced by the  presence of  hurricane  David.
On the morning of  5 Sept 79,   Lake  Erie was  under  the  influence  of a
broad  Great  Lakes  high pressure area.   By the  time sampling was  started,
winds  at the  sampling  site  were from the  ENE "at  about  5ms".   High

-------
                                  17


cirrus provided a 90% cloud cover and the horizon was very hazy.   Winds


dropped to about 3ms   during the night and shifted to the north--


but as David progressed up the East Coast, the speed increased steadily


reaching 7 m s~ .  The wind direction became progressively more westerly,


being almost due west at 1200 CDT on 6 Sept 79 and WSW by the early


afternoon.  Some light rain was encountered during the late afternoon


of 6 Sept 79.


     The windspeed began to drop again during the evening and the wind


direction moved to NNW.  Winds were too light to do any sampling  from


about 0000 CDT to 0100 CDT on 7 Sept 79   when the wind picked up from


the NNW.  Near sunrise the sky cover was about 30 percent.  This  cover


increased through the remainder of the day, becoming about 80 percent


in the afternoon.  Visibility was, however, exceptionally good.  Near


1200 CDT on 7 Sept 79, the wind shifted to the WNW and began to increase.


By 1500 CDT, winds were over 10 m s


     Of the 49 hours on-site, 45 hours were devoted to actual sampling;


there was a total of 3 hours of rain delays and low wind speeds when


no sampling could be done.  Less than one hour was necessary for  on-site


equipment adjustments and filter changes.  A total of eleven data sets


were  collected on this cruise.  This period was one of prevailing  winds


from the northern shore of Lake Erie, and aerosol  mass concentrations

             _3
of 10-25 yg m   were indicated by the Integrating Nephelometer.


     This cruise ended short of the time scheduled.  At about 1400 CDT


on 7 Sept 79 the wind speed sharply increased from a 5-6 m s"  range


to a 10-13 m s   range; wave heights promptly increased from less than


1  m to 3-5 m.  For reasons of personnel  safety and prevention of


permanent damage to  equipment the ship weighed anchor and departed


station at about 1700 CDT on 7 Sept 79.'

-------
                                   18



     The third and last cruise on Lake Erie  began  16  Oct  79,  with  the



Carson arriving on site at about midnight.   At the beginning  of  the



cruise, Lake Erie was Southeast of a rapidly occluding  front.  This


brought small amounts of scattered rain and  a generally overcast sky.



Winds were 5-6 m s"  from the SW.  As the system passed over  the lake,


winds dropped to 2 m s   with a wind shift to the  NW  accompanied by  some


clearing.  By 2100  CDT on 16 Oct 79, winds  had shifted to ENE and were



increasing.  17 Oct 79 was overcast except for a brief  period of partial



clearing in the morning.  That evening, the  lakes  began to feel  the



influence of a well-developed low pressure system west  of the lakes.


The leading warm front swept over Lake Erie  that night.  The  pressure


dropped rapidly and winds increased dramatically to 8-10  m s   .   The


morning of 18 October  79, the sky was clear, but overcast again  by 1100  CDT.


     All of  the 65 hours on-site were spent in sampling.   Mo  rain



delays were  necessary  despite scattered showers in the  area;  overlapping


aerosol  data sets  contributed to the  100% efficiency of on-site  sampling


time.  A total of  thirteen data  sets  were collected.   Aerosol concentration

                                                         -3
during this  cruise period was moderate,  in  the  30-80 yg m   range.  Wind


speed  and  direction  were, as  previously  described, quite variable.


Atmospheric  temperature  stability was neutral  to  unstable, AT = 0 to 0.2°C.

-------
                                   19

                               SECTION 4
                   DATA, ANALYSIS AND BASIC RESULTS

4.1  AEROSOL ELEMENTAL DATA
     One immediately obvious factor in examining the aerosol  trace
element data is that concentrations over Lake Trie were relatively
low, compared to expectations based on Lake Michigan data.  Despite
longer average filter run times during the Lake Erie cruises, almost
all samples initially fell  below the inductively coupled argon plasma
atomic emission spectroscopy (ICAP) detection limits set by USEPA-CRL.
Uoon careful examination of the raw (no detection limit) ICAD data
a  SEPA   rate series of reagent blanks, filter blanks, field blanks,
and spike samples were calculated.  This led to the determination of
detection limits (c + 3-a of lab DI water samples) for this group of
samples far below the USEPA-CRL values.  That calculation resulted in
the recovery of many data points which had been thought to be lost in
the ICAP instrumental noise.  The filter field blank corrections (c + a)
were also determined and analyses of replicates indicate a mean
reproducibility of about 20 percent or better for ten elements, even
at these low levels (Table  1).   Typical sample values, also in Table 1,
were derived from overall averaged concentrations and run times.
Because the typical sample  concentrations are not always too  far above
the filter blanks, it is difficult to justify, with statistical
significance, the examination of the ICAP data in individual  data set
by data set cases.  It is more  reasonable to aggregate several  data
sets,  based o.n similar values of defining parameters, and discuss mean
concentration values for the group of sets.  Recovery studies shov/ that
>90/o for all except Al ,  for which 50-70% recoveries were determined.  Al
concentrations determined by ICAP were enhanced by a factor of 60% to
compensate for its poor  recovery.
     Table 2 is based on all data sets collected at mid-Lake  Erie
during the summer and fall  of 1979.  The overall  geometric mean
concentrations are given for those elements which appeared above
detection limits and blank  corrections in 75 percent or more  of the
data sets.  These mean concentrations are generally a factor  of three
to eight lower than the  concentrations observed over Lake Michigan
during 1977.

-------
                     20
Table 1.  ICAP BLANKS, DETECTION LIMITS,
          AND TYPICAL SAMPLE (yg I"1)
Al
Ba
Cd
Cu
Cr
Fe
Mn
Ni
Pb
Ti
In
Field Blank
(c + l»a)
85
12
2.8
44
6.6
180
4.7
0.3
n
2.9
59
Detection Limit
(c + 3« a)
0.8
0.1
0.3
2.5
0.1
2.0
3.4
3.3
7.6
0.3
9.0
Typical
Sample
180
20
22
105
18
380
15
42
32
12
330

-------
                                21
        Table  2.   ^ID-LAKE  ERIE AEROSOL, GALE  1979  SETS

Al
Ba
Cd
Cu
Cr
Fe
Mn
Ni
Pb
Ti
Zn
C, ng-m
35*
1 .2
2.0
10.4
1 .8
46
0.8
3.0
3.5
1.0
37
F/C1
1.9
4.8
7.4
4.3
3.4
2.0
2.2
2.6
6.2
1 .2
6.3
M%
0.1
.004
.006
.03
.004
0.13
.003
.01
.01
.003
0.11
EF**
= 1 .0
8.0
2900
1100
3.3
2.4
2.0
140
720
- 0.8
1500
pp **
=1 .0
3.5
1800
120
n.d.
2.1
5.9
230
3200
0.9
320
  Includes 60% enhancement due to poor analytical recovery,
 4-
 'Corrected for pass-through filter loss.
**
  Approximate due to Al  recovery problem.

-------
                                   22
     It is important to interject here the results of the pass-through
experiment   (PTE).  It was found that 37 ± 7% of Pb, 32 ± 6% of Zn
and 12 ± 3% of Fe collected on the backup filter passes on through that
filter.  A significant correction factor must, then, be applied to
the observed concentrations.  This has been done in Table 2 by accounting
not only for pass-through losses but also the  5% cascade impactor wall
loss of small particles identified by the impactor manufacturer (Sierra).
Other parameters describing the composite of the aerosol also seem quite
interesting for Lake Erie.  Values of the fine to coarse (F/C) aerosol
ratio are calculated as
                   =   c (backup filter, D < 1 .0 ym)
                       c (1st stage impactor, D > 1 .0
The elemental mass percent, (M%),
                        „„/ _ c (trace element)
                             B (total aerosol )
values are much lower than the corresponding values  for the Lake Michigan
aerosol.  However, enrichment factors, EF, based on  Bowen's (1966)
midwestern soils with Al as the indicator element, correspond fairly well
with the Lake Michigan aerosol data  (Table 2).  This may suggest some
similar source types for both sites, with added source modification or
transport-dependent processes affecting the Lake Erie data.
     In order to examine the differences in aerosol  composition parameters
more closely, back-trajectory plots were used to group data sets having
similar source regions.  Figures 4 and 5 are examples of the trajectory
plots, showing horizontal extent and vertical depth of the most probable
source regions for each set.  Figure 6 is a summary of all plotted
trajectories, showing the most likely 24-hr averaged plots.  From these
data, each of the sets was grouped into one of four general source regions.
On the U.S.  side of the lake, all non-Cleveland area trajectories were
labelled US-rural.  All sets  from the Canadian side were called Canada-rural,
while all trajectories  that  did not  reach shore within 24-hr are  "Lake"
sets.   Finally, those data sets obtained while the ship was directly
downwind of  Cleveland were grouped together.  The approximate ship-to-
shore compass sectors for each  of these  four  source regions is: US-Psural ,
60°-190°; Lake, 240°-260° and 20°-60°; Canada-Rural, 260°-20°-,  and
Cleveland, 190°-240°.   The mean concentration data  (Table  3) for  each

-------
           LONDON
                                                 BUFFALO
                               ACCIW #2
                               A
      CCIW #1
         A
          R/V
        CARSON
                                                          	42
42°	
 CCIW #3
0   4
                                          Aerosol Trajectory Plot,
                                          Source Region Overlake.
CLEVELAND
                        PITTSBURGH
                    /  I
                                                          40°

-------
            LONDON
                                                    BUFFALO
                                ACCIW
      CCIW #1
          A
           R/V
         CARSON
                                         42°	
 CCIW #3
0  A
                                          Aerosol  Trajectory Plot,
                                          Cleveland Area Source
                                          Region.
CLEVELA*
           50   75   100

         Kilometers
                                 PITTSBURGH

                                   O
                     /  i
                                                             40'

-------
 1979
84
83
                                                                           	42C
                                                                    Summary of 1979 Plotted
                                                                    Trajectories,  End-Point
                                                                    is Most Likely Location
                                                                    24-hr Back in  Time.
                                                                                  41 <
-1 	 1 	 1
1 	 1
f
PITTSBL
O
RfiH ' — I I — 1 1 — > l
nun i 	 i i 	 i i
0 50 75
Kilometers
|
100
82
81
80°
79°
                                             /  I
                                                                                  40°

-------
                                26



Table 3.  GEOMETRIC MEAN CONCENTRATIONS,GALE  1979  SETS,  ng m"3

AT
Ba
Cd
Cr
Fe
Mn
Ni
Pb
Ti
Zn
US-Rural
27
3.3
1 .9
0.6
17
1 .0
0.7
2.2
0.3
18
Lake
26
0.5
0.4
0.8
30
0.8
0.4
2.6
0.3
36
Canada-Rural
25
1 .4
0.1
4.1
59
0.3
0
0.2
0.3
13
Cleveland
55
2.4
3.6
1.5
74
0.8
0.7
11 .
1 .0
147

-------
                                   27
of these source regions contains no surprises.  That is to say, the
Cleveland source clearly dominates, especially given the prevailing
winds in this area.  Note that the mean concentration of Pb and Zn in
the Cleveland source is more than twice that from all three other
source regions combined.  Additional  information about each source
region is obtained from the ASAS data.  Figures 7 and 8 are plots of
aerosol volume distribution, from the ASAS data, which show distinct
differences between the lake and Cleveland source regions.  The lake
region source has a clear bimodality suggesting that two separate source
types contribute, the small aerosol (r of 0.1-0.2 ym) source may be
similar to the Cleveland aerosol source.  The large aerosol (r of 0.4-0.5 pm)
source may be the lake itself.  A discussion of the Great Lakes as an aerosol
source is found in Appendix D.

4.2  DEPOSITION VELOCITY PARAMETERIZATION
     The largest single uncertainty in Great Lakes atmospheric loading
estimates—despite efforts to reduce  it—remains the estimation of a
deposition velocity, v..  Progress over the last two years has been made
on the modeling of the deposition process and some data on deposition
velocity as a function of aerosol diameter, v , (D) were obtained over Lake
Michigan.  Yet, the uncertainty in v, (D) is still nearly an order of
magnitude for 0.02 < D < 2 ym.  Indeed, the summary table in the Executive
Summary of the Lake Michigan final report (EPA 905/4 - 79 - 016) would
be better to have the columns "minimum dry deposition" and "mean dry
deposition" retitled to read "moderate estimate" and "high estimate,"
respectively.  This less accurate statement of loadings is the result of
a more sophisticated understanding of the deposition process obtained by
our parameterization efforts as well  as the modeling efforts by the SI inns
and by Hicks and Williams.  SI inn and SI inn (1980) have assessed the
contribution of particle growth in high RH environments and Hicks and
Williams (1980) have added the effects of diffusion, sedimentation and
growth to their own analysis of whitecapping and subsequent lake capture
of airborne particles by reducing surface transfer resistance to zero
over that percentage of the surface where whitecapping exists.  Both
of these modeling efforts suggest a fairly strong dependence of v. on

-------
                               28
                         Set 01130    (LAKE)
AV
jum3
cm 3
       10
        10
                   0.1
1.0
                           particle radius, fim
                  Figure  7.  Aerosol Volume Distribution
                           Plot for Overlake Trajectory
                           Case.

-------
                                29
                      Set 01180   (CLEVELAND)
AV

 jjm3
 cm 3
        10
                   0.1
                              1.0
                              particle radius,
     Figure 8.
Aerosol  Volume Distribution Plot for Cleveland Source

Region Trajectory Case.

-------
                                  30

D in the 0.1  < D < 1  ym particle size range,  as  have previous  modeling
efforts.  Our parameterization has accounted  for what meager  data  is
available on v. (D).   Limited profile sampling while aboard  the  R/V
Simons on Lake Michigan in 1977 showed that v . varied by only  two- to
threefold in the 0.1  < D < 1  ym particle size range.  It was  also  found
that the ratio of v.  to the aerodynamic transfer velocity (transfer
controlled by turbulence) was 1/3 to 1/2 for  eleven moderate  wind  speed
(2.4 < u < 8.2 m s  ) profile data sets.
     Any mechanism which results in a small variation in aerosol  v. for
0.1  < D < 2 yn is a candidate for explaining  the profile results  above.
Conditions near to the air/water interface are portrayed in  Figure 9,
Here, the surface layer is seen as three seoarate zones: a turbulent
layer, a buffer layer and a viscous sublayer.  The turbulent  layer
constitutes the largest portion of the surface layer depth of several
meters to several tens of meters and here v"J   = r .  A continuous  viscous
sublayer enveloping all or nearly all of the  surface roughness elements
follows the gross observable contour of the water's surface.   Mass
transfer within the viscous sublayer is dominated by molecular transport,
i.e., Brownian motion  (for small particles less affected by gravitation).
The buffer layer is a transition zone in which turbulence is  reduced by
the close proximity of the surface.  Both turbulence-induced eddies and
Brownian motion contribute to mass transfer in the buffer layer.   As
higher wind speeds and less stable air prevail within the surface layer,
a rough flow regime becomes dominate [Figure 9 (b)] in which many of the
surface roughness elements protrude outside of a now discontinuous viscous
sublayer resulting in a more efficient path for mass transfer.  The wind
speed and/or temperature stability at which this rough flow regime occurs
is  quite uncertain.   Yet it is  certain that under rough flow conditions
turbulent transfer and impaction will increase overall mass transfer
substantially.
      Kondo et  al.  (1973) found  that  30% of the roughness elements due to
high-frequency components of ocean waves protrude outside the viscous
sublayer at U,Q= 2 m  s   wind  speeds.  At  u-,0 = 8 m s~  Kondo et al . (1973)
found that over 99% of the high-frequency  roughness elements protrude outside
the remaining  discontinuous sublayer.  These  percentages should not be very

-------
           SMOOTH FLOW
             TURBULENT LAYER
                                  ROUGH  FLOW
                                    TURBULENT LAYER
              BUFER LAYER
            VISCOUS SUBLAYER
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA A
                                     BUFER LAYER
                    a
                  Figure 9.
Diagrammatic  Representation of the Surface Layer Above the
Air-Water Interface:  (a)  Smooth flow;   (b)  Rough flow.

-------
                                  32
different for the surface of Lake Michigan.   From a physical  viewpoint  it
must be concluded that the ratio of the height of the protrusions,  h  ,
to the viscous sublayer thickness should be  an important factor for
smooth or rough flow dominance (Schlichting, 1968).  Since 307, of the
high-frequency wave components can be expected to protrude outside  the
sublayer at 2 m s   and the mean surface roughness height may equal  the
viscous sublayer thickness at 3 m s~ (Kondo  et al ., 1973), smooth flow
conditions may not prevail above 2ms   and probably not above 3ms
Kondo et al.  (1973) found the roughness Reynolds  number range for transition
from smooth to rough flow as 6 < u*h / v> < 67, where u* is the friction
velocity and  v the kinematic viscosity.  SethuRaman (1979) found
20 < u*h /v < 75 for this transition region  at a  stabilized buoy off
Long Island.   This descrepancy with Kondo et al.  (1973) suggests the
transition region may not be encountered until u-, ^ reaches 4 or 5 m s
However, SethuRaman (1979) restricted his analysis to cases when the
waves propagated in the same direction as the wind.  In the 2< u,g <  5ms
range, wind speed and especially wind direction variability increase.
As a result,  the "aged-wave" condition which SethuRaman (1979) considered
may not prevail.  Indeed, Done!an (1977) found drag coefficients (C^)
of 15 x 10"  and larger in the developing wave condition and "a pronounced
minimum in this drag coefficient as the wave field approached maturity."
Boutin et al. (1977)  found a direct dependence of the drag coefficient
uoon wind speed variability below D9 = 4 m s~  with resultant drag
                                                            3
coefficient mean and standard deviation of 1.8 and 1.3 x 10  , respectively.
Wind speeds were in the 1.2 < iL < 3.6 m s   range.
     Fully rough flow for aerodynamic transfer is usually assumed to
prevail at uin = 8 m s~  and above, whereas  one may expect a transition
                        -1                             -1
flow between 3 and 8 m s~  , and smooth flow below 3ms   .  It has been
stated that aerodynamic transfer can be expected to be larger  (possibly
much larger) than mass transfer in the buffer layer during transition and
smooth flow because of what is known as the  bluff body effect  (Chamberlain,
1966).  In the immediate  vicinity of the surface, transfer to the surface
is controlled by skin friction and pressure forces, caused by fluid
impacting on the roughness elements of the surface.  Transfer by pressure
forces at  the surface is  known as form drag and  since there is no apparent

-------
                                  33

 analogue  in mass transfer, a possibly severe limitation of the near
 equality  between aerodynamic and mass transfer is encountered within the
 buffer layer and especially the viscous syblayer.
     However, Wu (1979) has shown that the "young-wave" condition observed
 by  Donelan  (1977) and Boutin et al. (1977) can generate gravity-capillary
 waves at  wind speeds of 2-3 m s"  .  This could explain the occurrence of
 high frequency wave protrusion through the viscous sublayer at
 2 < u,g < 3 m s  .  Further, Owen and Thomson (1963) have shown that
 horseshoe eddies wrap themselves around the individual roughness elements
 for those that are closely spaced.  Such eddies can be expected to result
 from high-frequency wave components.  If we now reconsider the data of
 Kondo et  al. (1973), it does not seem unlikely that transfer through the
 buffer layer and impaction to the roughness elements within a discontinuous
 viscous layer induce a low-resistance path for particle transfer when
 compared  to molecular diffusion transfer within the viscous sublayer.
 This path may be available to only a few of the particles in the buffer
 layer but may nonetheless be a relatively efficient transfer path even
 at 2 m s   wind speeds.  Further discussion may be found in Sievering
 (1981).
     The above discussion indicates  that u*h  A>  may be a key parameter
 in the estimation of aerosol  vd over the Great Lakes, h , the characteristic
 height of water surface roughness elements is the only unknown in this
 parameter.  By following the reasoning of Kitaigorodskii (1973) h  can be
 stated as                    ^   -,     2
                       \ •    Y
                                              _2
where g is the gravitational  constant, 9.8 m  s    and u*, again, is the
 friction velocity,   u^ may itself be approximated as ^- so  that we can
approximate h  over Great Lakes surfaces  as a function which  is
proportional to  the third power of the mean wind  speed during any one
 filter sampling  set.   During rough flow conditions we may still  assume
vd to equal  aerodynamic transfer (vrf = u  •  C  ^, where C~D is  the  stability
corrected drag coefficient—see App. B of the Lake Michigan final  report).
 Further,  from the Lake Michigan profile results we can estimate v, to be
1/3 to 1/2 of u  • Cg_  during moderate  flow conditions.  We  will  continue
to assume v , = 0 under smooth  flow conditions.  Table 4 shows, then, the
parameterization .resulting from our  consideration of the available
 (meager)  experimental  data plus theoretical  arguments.

-------
                               34




     Table 4.   PARAMETERIZATION OF DEPOSITION  VELOCITY,
 u*h                                               # of Lake

 - -                          v ,                   Erie Sets
  v                             d
  0-10                        0                         5



 10-25             (1/8 to 1/4) .  u .  CDD               R



 25-50             (1/3 to 1/2) .  u .  CDD               7



 50-70             (2/3 to 3/4) .  u .  CDD               6



>70                           1 .  u .  CD[)               2

-------
                                  35
                      u*hs
The available data on 	  versus flow condition indicates  that the
                       V
range of values between 10 and 25 to  be indefinite as  to  smooth or
moderate and 50-70 indefinite as to moderate  or rough.  Thus,  the
parameterization in Table 4.
     Of the twenty-eight filter sets  obtained at mid-Lake Erie (not
counting the three sets obtained while  steaming back to dock), the
                                u*ns
number falling into each of the 	  ranges  is  shown in the  last column
                                 vs                  _1
of the table.  The overall Lake Erie  average  v. ~ 0.35  cm s    obtained
                                                                      -1
by this parameterization may  be seen  to be  less than half the  0.75 cm s
had v . = u • Cnn been used.
     d        UU
     To this point in the parameterization  we have not  dealt with the
particle size dependence of v,.  Partly this  is because the  Lake Michigan
profile results (Sievering, 1981) suggest a  small  (^ twofold)  correction.
Alternatively, a review of SI inn and  SI inn  (1980), Hicks  and Williams
(1980), and, more recently, Williams  (1981)  on  the contribution of particle
growth in 100% RH environments--as over the  Great Lakes—suggests that
for particles of D > 1  ym, v, equals  the aerodynamic transfer  velocity
(u •  Cnn)-  Since our Great Lakes aerosol sampling obtained  elemental
mass  concentration in the D > 1 and D < 1 ym  size fractions  the
parameterization of Table 4 is to be  applied  only to the  D < 1  ym
aerosol fraction.  For D > 1  ym it is assumed,  as part  of this overall
parameterization, that v . = u • CDD.

-------
                                  36

                               SECTION 5

                       INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS

     Our approach to interpretation throughout this three-year
Lake Erie research effort has focused on the preparation of articles
for scientific peer review with hoped for publication in refereed
journals.  Two articles already published are:  1) Profile Measurements
of Particle Mass Transfer at the Air-Water Interface, Atmospheric
Environment, vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 123-129 (1981); 2) Air-Sea Particle
Exchange at a Nearshore Oceanic Site, Journal of Geophysical  Research,
vol. 87, No. C13, pp. 11027-37 (1982).  Several  articles are either
under review or still in preparation.  For this  reason they are
appendices to this research report.  In order of appearance in the
appendices they are (with note in parens on status and journal):
A) Lake Breeze Effects on Particle Size Spectra  and Sulfate Concentration
over Lake Michigan (submitted  reviewed  and being revised for publication
in Journal of Applied Meteorology ); B) Chemical Uniformity of Atmospheric
Aerosol:  Its Violation at a Mid-Lake Erie Site  (submitted to Atmospheric
Environment); C) Tech. Note:  Trace Element Pass-Through for Cellulose
Impactor Substrates and Filters When Used for Aerosol Collection (not
yet submitted for review); D) Chemical Elements  in Atmospheric Aerosol
over Southern Lake Michigan: The Contribution of the Lake Source
(submitted, reviewed  and being revised for publication in Journal  of
Great Lakes Research); and E) Some Effects of Wind-Shift on Over-Lake
Turbulence and Aerosol Deposition.  All these appendices will be referenced
at various points in this Interpretative Section.  A few points of major
concern to this USEP'A report will not be submitted for publication elsewhere
and are, therefore, discussed in some detail below.

5.1  SHIP/BUOY METEOROLOGICAL DATA INTEPCOMPARISON AND THE REPRESENTATIVENESS
     OF SHIP SAMPLING
     Is ship sampling at one point and for relatively brief time periods
representative of the whole lake's meteorology  and climatology?  The
Lake Erie sampling program provided a unique opportunity to assess the
question  of ship versus whole lake meteorology  thanks to the Canada

-------
                                  37

Center for Inland Waters (CCIW).  CCIW has deployed three buoys on Lake
Erie as shown in Figure 2.  The intercomparison of buoy #1  with ship
sampled meteorological data is of interest.  Yet, of greater interest
is the intercomparison of the three buoys' meteorological data during
the three ship sampling periods, since this intercomparison affords us
the opportunity to consider how meteorologically representative is the
ship's location.
     Buoy-gathered data were taken at the three Lake Erie sites
previously mentioned.  When looking at these data several points
should be kept in mind.  The measurement height was not specified but
appears (from photos) to be from 1 to 2 m.  The buoy data were taken
such that hourly-averaged values are centered on the hour whereas ship
data result in hourly averaged values centered 7.5 minuter before the
hour.  Only temperature, wind speed and direction are here considered
since they are very likely the meteorological  parameters most important
in lake loading estimates.
     Inspection of the data reveals several periods when the buoy
intercomparison shows large discrepancies but fewer periods and smaller
discrepancies between ship and buoy #1  located less than 10 km apart.
Indeed the difference between ship and buoy #1  for wind speed and
temperature averaged across one-hour periods only very rarely results
in a more than 5% difference in the bulk Richardson number (proportional
to wind speed squared divided by temperature).   This difference in
calculated Richardson number was never more than 8%.  We may conclude
differences between ship and buoy #1 data are primarily related to
instrumentation measurement errors.  The larger discrepancies between
ship (or buoy #1) data at central  Lake Erie and those data  obtained
by buoy #2 or #3 at the western and eastern ends of Lake Erie are more
likely due to synoptic or mesoscale meteorological  differences.
     There were a few cases where the buoys reported similar values, but
with a lag time between them indicating a westward or eastward moving
disturbance.   These were for temperature: 25 July 4:00 to 6:00; 5:00 to
10:00, 6 Sept  and for wind speed:  25 July  4:00 to 12:00; 28 July
8:00 to 12:00; 6 Sept 12:00 to 17:00; and 17 Oct  6:00 to 13:00.  Times
are local.  These disturbances are as would be expected with frontal
passages and require no further comment.  However, a few cases did not
seem to be associated with synoptic disturbances.  These generally had

-------
                                  38

a large spread among the  three  buoys.   For  wind  speed:  26  July  21:00 to
27 July 11:00; 6 Sept 14:00 to  7  Sept  15:00;  17  Get  almost all  of the
24-hr period; 18 Oct 14:00 to  24:00;  and  for  temperature:  26  July 7:00 to
27 July 4:00; 5 Sept 2:00 to 6  Sept  10:00;  17 Oct  4:00  to  16:00.  The
similarity of these periods of  discrepancy  with  each other for  both wind
speed and temperature point to  other  than instrumental  problems.  They
are most likely due to lake/mesoscale  effects.   Depending  on  whether one
considers wind speed or temperature  these periods  represent 13-23% of the whole
overall,   though, the meteorological  data  taken at  the shin  are representtive
of the entire open water area  (i.e.,  removed  from  nearshore)  of Lake Erie
except, of course, when synoptic  disturbances are  present.
     Regarding the question, is ship  sampling representative  of lake
climatology, a chi-square test  was  applied  to compare the  ship  station
observations of wind speed, wind  direction  and thermal  stability  (i.e.,
air-water temperature difference) with the  ten-year  NOAA Lake Erie
Climatology (Summary of Synoptic  Meteorological  Observations  for Great
Lakes Areas, Vol. 1,  Lake Ontario  and Lake Erie).  Data on wind speed
and thermal stability were grouped  into five  bins  each  (thus, 4 degrees
of freedom) and for wind direction  into eight bins (7 degrees of freedom).
Chi-square values are 42,38 and 11  for wind speed, thermal stability and
wind direction, respectively,  indicating that we can accept,  with only
0.1%, 0.2% and 25% probability, the  hypothesis that  there  is  no difference
between ship-sampled and annualized  climatological data on Lake Erie wind
speed, thermal stability and wind direction,  respectively. When only
June, July, and October climatological data are  considered the probabilities
increase to 5%, 10% and 40%.  These  very low probabilities indicate  that
a  very poor representation of Lake Erie climatology  was observed  during
ship sampling during June, July,  and October of 1979.  This is  especially
so regarding the under-represented high wind speeds  (>  9 m s   ) which
occur 12% of the climatologically average year and unstable thermal  conditions
which occur nearly 40% of the climatologically average  June,  July,  and
October as well as the climatologically average year.  A cumulative
frequency plot of the ship-sampled wind speed regime (ship sample)  versus
the lake's climatologically average wind speed regime is shown in  Figure  10
 (with Lake Michigan wind speed regime also shown).  The Southwest  (primarily

-------
CUMULATIVE FREQUENCY OF OCCURRENCE

-n
CQ
1
o
3 0
-'• c:
0 3
zr c:
CQ CU
CU c+
3 ->•
C~> (0
->• -p
3 -S
Cu fD
O C
— ' fD
0 3
CQ O
0
Cu ~O
__l ~«l
o
__i.
3 0
Q. -h
GO I/O
"O 3"
fD -••
fD -a
Q. 1
co
O Co
o 3
3 T3
Q. — '
r+ Q.
— 1.
O O)
3 3
CO Q.
r~
Cu
fD
CO
m
fD
Cu
3
CL

13
m
m
p
m
— i
m
DO
c/5
m
o






























CO
b

b
en
b
p>
b
•^ 1
b

00
b
CD
b

p
b
_L
b
ro
b


CO
b
_».
•^
b

"^^
en
b

O)
b
_L
b

CO
b
                   6£

-------
                                   40
5.2 AEROSOL CHARACTERISTICS AND THE ESTIMATION1 OF ATMOSPHERIC DRV LOADING
     Even though meteorological conditions were not representative of
Lake Erie's climatology, aerosol  characteristics may have been so.  It
was, however, noted at the close  of Section 4 that the Cleveland source
area (southwest wind direction sector) was severely under-represented.
This raises doubts about the representativeness of aerosol  data in
Tables 1, 2, and 3.  Since the major anthropogenic source area (Cleveland)
was lacking in its contribution and since no other anthropogenic sources
were within 40 km it is reasonable to expect the aerosol  character to be
similar to continental background or rural conditions.  Indeed, elemental
concentrations in Table 2 are quite low.  Yet, the enrichment factors for
Cu and Zn are high relative to those over Lake Michigan.
     Rahn (1976) has suggested that rural and remote continental aerosol
should all display the same relative elemental proportions.  Peirson et al .
(1974) observed such a uniformity at eight locations throughout the United
Kingdom.  Stolzenburg and Andren  (1981) also observed this uniformity in
rural areas of the United States.  It was concluded that  a close
comparison of the Lake Erie, Lake Michigan, and other aerosol elemental
data bases would help resolve the question of Lake Erie aerosol representa-
tiveness.  This effort has resulted in the Appendix B paper—Chemical
Uniformity of Atmospheric Aerosols: Its Violation at a Mid-Lake Erie Site.
Close scrutiny of Tables 1 and 2 of this Appendix (and the related text)
makes it clear that the Lake Erie elemental data base is  not representative
of conditions over the lake.  The violation of chemical uniformity (observed
by others: Peirson  et al., 1974; Stolzenburg and Andren, 1981; and King
et al., 1976 even in Cleveland) by, especially, the low Pb and high Cu and
Zn enrichment factors over Lake Erie make this a dubious  data base to
                    \
use in the binning analysis described in Section 3.1 (equation 2).  On
the other hand, the Lake Michigan data base fits the chemical uniformity
hypothesis quite well, supporting its use in binning analyses performed
in the past  (EPA-905/4-79-016).  The Appendix B paper suggests that the
high percentage SO* aerosol mass contribution over Lake Erie  (27%} versus
that over Lake Michigan  (12%) may have played a role in this violation of

-------
                                   41
the chemical uniformity hypothesis.  In any event, a severely restricted
use of the binning analysis must be considered in arriving at Lake Erie
atmospheric dry loading estimates.
     Before taking a close look at the Lake Erie loading estimates, it
should be noted that all elemental concentration data were corrected for
two types of sampling losses: a) cascade impactor loss of particulate
matter to the walls of the impactor   (Specified only in the last few
years); and b) aerosol pass-through loss past the Misco backup filter.
The former has been identified by the cascade impactor manufacturer
(Sierra Inc.) as 5 to 10%.  Since only two stages of the maximum five-stage
impactor were used in Lake Erie (and Lake Michigan) sampling a value of
5% loss, equally shared by the two stages' aerosol mass has been applied
to the data in Tables 2 and 3.  The second correction—aerosol pass-through
loss—was determined as a part of this Lake Erie Grant research.  Results
are fully described in Appendix C.  Overall mean percentage pass-through
loss was found to be 38,32 and 11% for Pb, Zn, and Fe, respectively.
Given the fine/coarse ratio (F/C) of these three elements and the F/C
of other elements (Table 2) a correction of 10-40% (dependent upon
element) was applied to the fine fraction mass determined by ICAP analysis.
 One final correction — to reiterate—has been applied to the comparative
presentation of Lakes Erie and Michigan dry loading estimates in the
Executive Summary; the deposition velocity parameterization at the end
of Section 4.  Thus, Lake Michigan loading estimates presented in this
document are about one-half those presented in the Lake Michigan final
report (EPA-905/4-79-016).
     As stated in the Executive Summary of. this  document, use of the
binning analysis with Lake Erie data results in  very large uncertainty
loading estimates—at least an order of magnitude.  The lack of representa-
tiveness in aerosol  elemental  concentrations and meteorological  data in
combination with the still  quite ill-determined  deposition velocity causes
one to view the Lake Erie loading estimates "with some skepticism."
Given the poor representation of high wind speeds and certain wind directions,
the comparison of Lake Erie loading figures with Lake Michigan loading
figures is not very meaningful; and it is meaningless to attempt any
extrapolation of the two lakes' loadings to others of the Great Lakes.

-------
                                   42
Cleveland source area) wind direction  sector was  very  severely  under-
represented (11% of ship sampling time as  opposed to  20% of the
climatologically average year.)  The same  statistics  when applied  to
earlier Lake Michigan data base give a much higher concordance  between
that ship samoling data base and the Lake  Michigan climatology—except
that > 9 m s   wind speeds are still under-represented.   (A cautionary
remark about probabilities calculated by the chi-square  test:  too  few
filter sets (28) are available to properly apply  the  chi-square  test.   The
probabilities stated above would likely increase  had  a larger  data base
been obtained.  Nonetheless, the stated probabilities, being so  very  low,
are a strong indication of the poor representation.)
     The mesoscale lake breeze effect on meteorological  conditions during
ship sampling was much less pronounced than during Lake  Michigan sampling.
Only during four of 28 data sets were back-trajectories  not drawn due  to-
complexities caused primarily by the lake breeze  effect.  As a result,
further analysis of the Lake Michigan lake breeze periods culminated  in
the Appendix A  Paper, Lake Breeze Effects on Particle Size Snectra and
Sulfate Concentration Over Lake Michigan, which shows that aerosol sulfate
may increase as a percentage of total aerosol mass while air parcels
traverse the lake breeze cell.
     A  "funnelling effect" over Lake Erie was not previously observed over
Lake Michigan.  This effect over Lake Erie is seen as a funnelling of the
wind flow over  the western end of the Lake causing a turning of the wind
in a direction  in accordance with the shape of the Lake.  Since the Lake
is shaped such  that the west end faces the northwest direction and curves
around  towards  the northeast,  the prevailing wind flow is observed as
following this  shape.   This over water flow is often seen as being much
stronger  (about 2-3 times  -faster) than the overland surface velocities.
It has  been noted during  the  funnelling effect that the wind velocities
were stronger on  the  windward  side  of the  Lake than on the leeward side.
The above was observed  to  occur predominantly with southerly flows.  The
speeding  up of  winds  over  the  lake  and longer traverse over water caused
by the  funnelling effect  should enhance pollutant fluxes to Lake  Erie.

-------
                                   43
 Yet,  there  is meaning  in  comparing the  relative loadings—one element
 to another.  Or, still  better,  there is meaning in considering the
 relative contribution  of  natural and anthropogenic sources to the
 aerosol elemental concentrations observed over Lake Erie and Lake Michigan.
 5.3   NATURAL AND ANTHROPOGENIC  SOURCE CONTRIBUTIONS TO GREAT LAKES
      ATMOSPHERIC DRY LOADING AND THE FUTURE OF ATMOSPHERIC LOADING ESTIMATES
      Given  the difficulties encountered in the estimation of atmospheric
 dry loading to date it may be more fruitful to pursue a different
 interpretive path.  Recent developments in receptor-oriented multivariate
 statistical analysis (Gordon, 1980; Cooper and Watson, 1980) have
 resulted in a powerful technique to quantify the contribution of
 several aerosol source types to the aerosol elemental concentrations
 observed at the midlake receptor sites.  This technique may be labelled
 chemical mass balance  if  a sufficiently large percentage of the aerosol
 mass  has been chemically  characterized.  In the case of the Lake Erie
 and Lake Michigan data bases less than one-third of the aerosol  mass has
 been  characterized by  elemental, sulfate (SO.) and nitrate (Nn ) analyses.
 Thus, a chemical element  balance (CEB) approach was considered.   Appendix D,
 Chemical Elements in Atmospheric Aerosol over Southern Lake Michigan: the
 Contribution of the Lake  Source, is the result of elemental balance across
 seven source types as  applied to the 1979 crib site data base.  The crib
 site  data base was chosen for CEB application for two reasons:  1) this
 data  base is smaller than the mid-Lake Michigan data base, making this
 first CEB application easier from a computational  standpoint; 2) the
 highest quality chemical  analyses appear to have been performed  on these
 '79 crib samples.  From a long-term Great Lakes research perspective the
 crib site CEB- results must be considered preliminary.   Nonetheless, some
 very  interesting (preliminary)  outcomes may be found in the Appendix D
 paper.  Of greatest interest is  the somewhat tentative indication of a
 substantial  lake aerosol source — both  fine  fraction (diameter, D < 1  ym) and
 coarse fraction (D > 1  ym).   See Tables VII  and VIII  as well  as  related
 text of Appendix D.
     A preliminary analysis  of  the  USEPA Great Lakes  Atmospheric Deposition
 network data suggests  the presence  of  a lake  aerosol  source (Lueck and
Sievering,  1981).   Figure 1,  an  example ASAS  number distribution  plot, had
shown  a bimodality suggesting the presence  of a lake  aerosol  source  with a mean

-------
                                   44
diameter of  ^ 1  ym.  This supports the CEB analysis result  above.   A
fine/coarse fraction comparison of midlake to crib site data on Lake "ichigan
(Table IV of Appendix D) does not violate this outcome, although it  does
show an enhanced Mg and Ca concentration in midlake large aerosol  compared
to the crib site. (Note: the SO^ and Pb fine/coarse fraction comparison
[again see Table IV of Appendix D] indicates an enhanced midlake fine
fraction.  This is probably due to the coagulation of aerosol  less than
0.1 ym which cause the crib site fine/coarse fractions to increase at
nidlake.)
       The magnitude of the lake source—both fine and coarse  fraction--
indicated by CEB analysis is from one-half to twice the soil source.  The
fine fraction lake source was found to about equal the sum of anthropogenic
source contributions to total fine fraction aerosol mass.  Of course, the
lake source does not contribute significantly to specific anthropogenic
pollutants such as Pb, Zn, and Cu.  Further, it should be noted that
fugitive dust sources were not considered in the CEB analysis.   In the
Chicago/Gary area, fugitive dust area sources contribute about  equally
with anthropogenic point sources to the suspended particulate  matter
(B. Bolka, 1982).  However, these'fugitive dust sources (primarily highway
aerosol and road dust) should not be of a similar chemical  constituency as
the lake source.
       The exercise of using multivariate statistical  analysis  (here, chemical
element balance approach) has proven to be a fruitful  one.   It  appears to
have enough merit that its application to the larger mid-Lake  Michigan data
base is planned among future research activities.  In particular,  the
determination of the relative contribution of several  anthropogenic  source
types to over Great Lakes aerosol mass or of their relative contribution  to
a particular element's overlake mass concentration would be of special interest
to the USEPA.  Another look at Table VII of Appendix D shows that  a  relative
contribution of cement manufacturing, steel production, oil  burning,
automobile exhaust and coal burning to crib site aerosol mass  concentration
has been obtained.  If CEB analysis were applied to the larger and isolated
(i.e., removed from the immediate vicinity of source types) mid-Lake Michigan
data base, the delineation of major anthropogenic source type  contributions--

-------
                                   45

at least one type relative to others--could be specified.   This could prove
immensely helpful to the USEPA in Great Lakes enforcement  strategies.
       There is yet another reason for taking this interpretive path: the
determination of over water deposition velocities for better than order-
of-magnitude Great Lakes loading estimation appears to be unreachable within
the next few years.  It may be better to apnly multivariate statistics to
a few Great Lakes pollution data bases in that more fruitful outcomes nay
be achieved from interpretation of these data bases.
       Many difficulties have been encountered with Lake Erie atmospheric
dry loading estimation.  Yet, it was also noted in the Executive Summary
that the single most uncertain factor (overwhelming all  others combined)
in the loading equation—equation 2 in Section 3.1--still  remains the
deposition velocity, v,.  As long as this situation remains so, the
estimation of atmospheric loadings to the Great Lakes by a product of
overlake concentration measurements with v, must remain  at order-of-magnitude
uncertainty.  The remainder of this section 5.3 will first digress into
the alternative method for lake loading estimation—lake mass balance
analysis—and then close with a brief discussion of some future needs in
v, measurement research.
 d
       Dolan and Bierman (1982) have recently published  a  good example
study of mass balance analysis with regard to Saginaw Ray, Lake Huron.
This is one of the few mass balance studies which have included sensitivity
analysis of the free parameters in the assumed mass balance model.  Of
the five free parameters, suspended solids and total metals were most
sensitive to variations in the settling velocity within  the water column.
Changes in this parameter result in solids' (and total  metals) leaving the
water column too soon (increased N) or staying in the  water column too long
(decreased N).  A 50% change in settling velocity caused from 24 to 110%
change in Cu, Pb, and Zn Saginaw Bay total  metal  concentrations.  This
24-110% range may be compared to uncertainties in the  mass balance model
results caused by the atmospheric loading input (fixed)  parameter,
Dolan and Bierman (1982) used the metals analysis from six bulk samplers
(collection on a monthly basis) located at several  sites around Saginaw
Bay.  These bulk samples are known to under-estimate the contribution of
dry deposition by 200% to as much as 1000% (Clough, 1973;   Ton, Eastman,-  and
Sievering, 1983).  Assuming the actual  dry deposition  loading to Saginaw
Bay to be 1/4 to 1/2 that of wet deposition,  the uncertainty in the atmospheric

-------
                                  46
loading input parameter is from  50% (200% x 1/4)  to  500%  (1000%  x  1/2).
This 50-500% uncertainty in atmospheric  loading  is to  be compared with
the 24-110% changes in modeled metals  concentrations  introduced by  the
most sensitive mass balance model  free parameter.   Clearly,  the uncertainty
in the atmospheric loading component overwhelms  all others  in  the Saginaw
Bay metals mass balance model.
       A similar—but less detailed—mass balance  calculation  for Lake
Erie was provided by Dr. J.A. Schmidt (private  communique,  1983).   Estimates
of atmospheric, tributary and shoreline  erosion  inputs (fixed  parameters)
were compared with sedimentation and outflow to  Lake  Ontario.  Table  5
shows the range in inputs and outputs for Cr, Cu,  Pb,  and  Zn.  These  ranges
are: atmospheric, 7 to 17-fold; tributary, 3 to  8-fold;  shoreline erosion,
30% to 2 1/2-fold; sedimentation, 40% to 2-fold; and  outflow,  less  than
2-fold.  These ranges, the result  of a  literature/data  review, clearly
show--again--that our knowledge of atmospheric  inputs  is  the weakest.
The order-of-magnitude uncertainty in atmospheric  inputs,  is many-fold larger
than all others except the tributary input uncertainty,  which  is  about
one-half as large as the atmospheric uncertainty.
       Having assured ourselves that a Great Lakes mass  balance approach
does not significantly increase our understanding of  nor reduce uncertainty
in the contribution of atmospheric deposition,  we can now  focus on  the
last interpretation topic of this report: Future Improvements  in  Atmospheric
Loading Estimates.  The last portion of Section 4 on  deposition velocity
(v.) parameterization suggested that for aerosol of diameter,  D  < 1 ym,
vd %  (1/3 to  1/2)  • u  ' CDp and for 0 > 1 ym, vrf £ u   • CpD. The  assumed
relative difference by size of 50 to 65% is the result of aerosol  profiling
field  studies on  Lake Michigan  (Sievering, 1981).  This  small  difference
may be contrasted with the at least ten-fold difference  in vrf  postulated
by SI inn and  SI inn  (1980)  for D = 0.1 ym versus D = 1  ym aerosol.  This
discrepancy  is at  the order-of-magnitude level  which   has plagued  the
atmospheric  dry  loading estimates throughout this report.   Slinn  and Slinn
(1980) obtain  this  very large vd difference for D = 0.1  ym versus D = 1  ym
aerosol as a  (theoretical) result of their consideration of aerosol growth
in the  high  humidity  environment near the water's surface.  Sievering (1981)
observed  the  only  two-fold difference for aerosol of  D = 0.2 ym versus  D = 2  ym

-------
                                   47

              Table 5.   MASS BALANCE ESTIMATE  FOR  LAKE  ERIE

                                Inputs
                       TOO              O  A  C                       C
Element     Atmospheric '  '       Tributary '  '       Shoreline  Erosion

   Cr            15-180             500-1800            120-220

   Cu            50-350            1000-3000            130-320

   Pb           150-2200            800-4800            240-310

   Zn           300-5200           1800-14000           390-700
         This report
        2
         International  Joint Commission,  1969.   "Pollution of  Lake  Erie,
   Lake Ontario and the International  section of the  St.  Lawrence River:
   Volume 12--Lake Erie,"  316 pp.

         Schmidt,  J.A.  & A.M. Andren,  1983.   "Atmospheric Trace Metal  Loading
   of the Great Lakes," in:  Evnironmental  Quality of  the  Great Lakes,  Jerome
   Nriage, editor, in press.
        4
         Blake, H.D., unpublished  data.   Heidelberg University.

        5Chawla, V.K.,  Y.K.  Chan,  1969.   Trace  Elements in Lake Erie.
   Proceedings, 12th Conference  on Great  Lakes  Res.,  pp.  760-765.

        6Monteith, T.J. &  W.C.  Sonzogni,  1976.   U.S.  Great Lakes Shoreline
   Erosion.   Task  D Report,  PLUARG.

                                Outputs

Element                   Sedimentation7'8'9            Outflow10

   Cr                         2300-3600                 2500

   Cu                         1700-2700                 1000-1800*

   Pb                         4500-9600                   700

   Zn                         5100-8100                 1800
         Kemp,. A.L.W.,  1975.   "Sources,  Sinks  and  Dispersion of  Fine-Grained
   Sediment in  Lake  Erie."   Proceedings  of  the Second  Federal  Conference on
   the Great Lakes,  pp.  369-377.
        p
         Kemp,  A.L.W. and  R.L.  Thomas, 1976.   "Impact  of Man's Activities
   on  the Chemical Composition  in  the Sediments of Lakes Ontario, Erie, and
   Huron."  W.A.S.P., 5;  469-490.
        9
         Walters,  L.J.,  T.J.  Wolery, and  R.D.  Myser, 1974.  In:  Proceedings,
   of  the 17th  Conference  on  Great Lakes  Res., pp.  219-234.

         International  Joint  Commission,  1978.  "Environmental Management
   Strategy for the  Great  Lakes System,"  final  report  from PLUARG, 115 pp.
        *
         Estimated from  Lake  Michigan trace metal  data and Lake  Erie river
   data.

-------
                                   48
aerosol  considering a small  number--!3--profiles  obtained during  moderate
wind speed conditions.   Thus, a question lingers  as  to whether  the  two-fold
difference is truly representative (Hicks and Williams, 1980).   Yet,  the
mechanism of surface roughness (and its variation)  with roughness element
protrusions acting as aerosol collection sites was  not considered by  Slinn
and Slinn (1980).  It was considered by Williams  (1981) in "A Model  for
the Dry Deposition of Particles to Natural  Water  Surfaces."  The  model  is
one with a broken surface resistance applied to a percentage of the water's
surface area based on oceanic observations  by Wu  (1979).  The equivalent
deposition velocity (v ,)--at the small  percentage of water's surface  which
is estimated to be broken — is assumed to be a constant value, either  1, 10,
100, or 1000 cm s" .  Williams suggests the 10 cm s~  value as  most probable,
but acknowledges that we only know that "broken surface transfer is more
efficient than turbulent transfer (vrf ^ 1 cm s~ )"  and that the broken
surface deposition velocity  is not a constant across the broken surface
area.  Further, Williams (1981) notes, "In the future, careful  measurements
of deposition velocity under a wide  range of wind speeds and particle
sizes should yield estimates of the value of this parameter [broken surface
v ,].  Until then we must make the assumption that the broken surface  transfer
is a constant.  Therefore, the effect on deposition by the broken surface
is solely contained in the fractional surface area that becomes broken."
       A major problem with  the Williams model is its steady state character.
The assumptions of a constant flux layer as well  as constant broken surface
deposition velocity allows one to mathemically model air-water aerosol
transfer—but too simplistically.  Observation of meteorological and wave
dynamics at the air-water interface of the Great Lakes should cause any
careful observer to denounce  steady state modeling as too simplistic and
unrealistic.  Models such as  that of Williams serve a very useful purpose
in pointing out areas  for further research as he states above.   However,
the dynamics at the  real air-water interface  suggest that the actual aerosol
deposition is greater  than modeling  results would have  us believe.  Enhanced
deposition due  to  the  "young wave" phenomenon  referred  to at the end of
Section  4  is to  be  expected.   That discussion  noted the  likelihood that
the  developing  wave  condition causes an  increased turbulent transfer.

-------
                                   49

Thus, a greater effect of the "young wave" phenomenon on small  aerosol  is
to be expected--possibly much greater.   Indeed, the Appendix E naper,  Some
Effects of Wind-Shift on Over-Lake Turbulence and Aerosol  Deposition,
shows that wind shifts are associated with depletion of near-surface
aerosol mass and with departures from isotropy.  Turbulence in the high
frequency range is known to normally have a ratio of vertical  velocity
spectra to longitudinal  velocity spectra of 4/3 in the isotrooic, inertia!
subrange.  Departures from isotropy caused by enhanced energy  in the
vertical velocity spectra were strongly correlated with a  "windshiftiness"
parameter (see Table 2 of Appendix E),  the rank correlation coefficient
being 0.925 (allowing one to reject the hypothesis of zero correlation  at
better than the one percent level).  The fact that aircraft measured
near-surface aerosol mass decreased in  conjunction with these  isotropy
departures as well is supporting evidence for the hypothesis that the
non-steady state dynamics at the air-water interface may enhance the
deposition of, especially, small aerosol.  The above discrepancy between
modeled ten-fold and field observed two-fold differences in large
(D > 1  ym) versus small  (D < 1 ym) aerosol deoosition may, then, be
attributed to models (to date) not accounting for the non-steady state
mechanisms of aerosol deposition at the air-water interface.
       A countervailing argument may, however, also be presented.  The
mechanism of aerosol resuspension from  the water's surface is  known to
be a contributor to large aerosol mass  above the ocean's surface (see,
for example, Cipriano and Blanchard, 1981).  Recently, Sievering, Eastman
and Schmidt (1982) have observed that resuspension may also contribute
to small aerosol mass above the ocean's surface (at 6-m height).  If large
aerosol resuspension is  more significant over Great Lakes' waters—as it
is generally considered to be over the  oceans,then the large aerosol
downflux gradients observed over Lake Michigan would have  been more reduced
by resuspension than would those for small aerosol.  Resuspension
introduces an upflux lake source gradient which was, in fact,  observed  on
more than one occasion during the profiling measurements on Lake Michigan
(Sievering, 1981).  The large aerosol mode in Figure 7   may again be
thought to be that elusive lake source  aerosol.  The important point here

-------
                                   50
is that the only two-fold difference observed in  larqe  (D  <  1  ym)  versus
small  (D < 1  vim) aerosol  deposition may be attributed more to  resuspension
of large lake-derived aerosol.   Thus, it is quite possible that  neither
the field observed two-fold nor modeled ten-fold  difference  in large  vs.
small  aerosol deposition are to be accepted.  The answer may well  lie in
between these two extremes.  Knowledge of the correct answer is  extremely
important since the magnitude of pollutant aerosol  deposition  is highly
dependent upon this answer.
     Recently El-Shoboksky (1983) found, for rough versus  smooth pipe flow,
an eight- to thirty-fold increase in v, for 1 vim  diameter  particles.
Experimental  conditions included average roughness element heights of 7 ym
                                                 4
(pipe diameter was 8 mm), a Reynolds number of 10  and  friction  velocity
of 120 cm s  .  Although turbulence characteristics were unrealistically
high (for ambient atmosphere conditions) the small  roughness elements
and steady state character were also somewhat unrealistic.  These laboratory
results certainly support the parameterization of small  difference between
large and small aerosol deposition.
     It must be concluded that "careful measurements of deposition velocity
under a winde range of wind speeds and particle sizes:  and at the (actual)
Great Lakes  air-water interface is a future  research necessity.   For the
purposes of  Great Lakes research, species  specific measurements  are also
a  necessity.  Pollutant species, e.g., Cd,  Cu, Pb, and Zn, may be observed
to be depositing into the  Great Lakes  at  the same time that Ca,  Mg, and
other potentially lake-derived elements are  emanating from the lakes'
surfaces  (see Section 4.1  and  5.2 on the  evidence for a lake  source).  Of
the presently available deposition  velocity measurement methods, i.e., eddy
flux, eddy accumulation,  variance and  gradient techniques, the most promising.
for species  specific measurement  is  the gradient technique.   Although
difficult  to utilize over  water  this technique is no more difficult,
logistically,  than  the others  mentioned;  however, a less direct measurement
of v   is  obtained and  both  vertical  temperature  and wind speed  gradients
    d
should  be  monitored in conjunction  with the aerosol gradient.

-------
                                  51

                              REFERENCES

Bolka, B.  USEPA Environmental Measurements Branch, private communique
      (1982).

Boutin, C., B. Boullery, J.P. Albignat, and H. Isaka.  Boundary-Layer
      Met., 12, 301-403 (1977)

Bowen, H.J.M.  Trace Elements in Biochemistry (Academic Press, New
      York, 1966^

Chamberlain, A.C.  Proc. R. Met. Soc., A296, 45-52 (1966).

Cipriano, R.J. and D.C. Blanchard.  J. Geonhys.  Pes.. 86, 8085-8092
      (1981).

Clough, U.S.  Aerosol Science, 4-, 227-234 (1973).

Coooer, A. and J.G. Watson.  J. Air Poll . Cont.  Assoc., 30^, 1116-
      1122 (1980).

Dave, M., D. Dolske, and H. Sievering.  Atmospheric Environment,  13,  1497-
      1600 (1979).

Dolan, D.M. and V.J. Bierman.  J. Great Lakes Pes., ^, 676-694 (1982).

Donelan, M.A.  Dynamic vs Steady-State Momentum  Drag Coefficients.  In
      Symposium on Modeling of Transport Mechanisms in Oceans  and  Lakes,
      pp. 46-54.  Dept. Fisheries and the Environment, Ottawa, Can. (1977).

El-Shobokshy, M.S.  Atmospheric Environment, 1_7_,  639-644 (1983).

Gatz, D.F.  Water, Air, and Soil Poll ., 5_, 239-250 (1975).

Gordon, G.E.  Environ. Sci. & Tech., 14, 792-799  (1980).

Hunt. J.C.R. and P.O. Mulhearn.  J. Fluid Hech.,  6]_, 245-254  (1973).

Jensen, V.E.  An Evaluation of Several  Methods of  Atmospheric Trajectories
      (Dept.  of Geog., Northern Illinois Univ., Dekalb, IL(1981).

King, R.B.,  J.S. Fordyce, A.C. Antoine, H.F. Leibecki, H.E. Neustadter,
     and S.M. Sidik.  J.  Air Poll . Cont. Assoc.,  26, 1073-1078 (1976).

Kitaigorodskii, S.A.  The Physics of Air-Sea Interaction tr.  from Russian
     by A. Baruch, Israel  Scientific Translations, Inc., Jerusalem,  237  pp.

Kondo J., Y. Fujinawa, and G. Naito.   J. Phys. Oceanogr., _3,  197-202  (1973).

Kraft, R.L.   Predictions  of Mass Transfer to Air-Land and Air-Water
     Interfaces, Penn. St.  Univ., CAES Publ., #472-77.

Lueck, D.M.  and H.  Sievering.  Great Lakes Atmospheric Deposition Network:
     Preliminary Results,  Amer. Inst.  of Aeronautics  and Astronautics
     Meeting, Orlando, FL,  January, 1982.

-------
National  Oceanic and Atmospheric Admin.  (NOAA).   Summary  of Synoptic
     Meteorological  Obs.  for Great Lakes  Areas,  Vol.  3, Lake  Michigan.
     Nat'l  Climatic  Center,  Asheville,  NC (1975).

Owen, P.R.  and W.R.  Thompson.  J. Fluid  Mech.,  1_5_,  231-334  (1963)

Peirson,  D.H., P.A.  Cawse,  and R.S.  Cambray.   Nature  251, 675-679  (1974).

Rahn, K.A.   The Chemical  Composition of  Atmospheric Aerosol  (Grad.  School
     of Oceanog., Univ. of  Rhode Island,  Kingston,  RI  (1976).

Schlichting, H.  Boundary-Layer Theory.   McGraw-Hill,  New York  (1968).

SethuRaman, S.  Boundary-Layer Met. , 1_6,  279-291  (1979).

SethuRaman  S. and J. Tichler.  J. Appl .  Met.,  1_6,  455-461  (1977).

Sievering,  H.  Atmospheric  Environment,  15, 343-351  (1976).

Sievering,  H., J. Eastman,  and J.A.  Schmidt.   J.  Geophysical  Research,
     87-C13, 1127-1137 (1982).

Sievering,  H., M. Dave, D.A. Dolske, R.L. Hughes,  and P.  McCoy.   An_
     experimental study of lake loading by aerosol  transport and dry
     deposition in the Southern Lake Michigan  Basin.   EPA-905/4-79-016
     71979).

Slinn, S.A. and W.G.N. Slinn.  Atmos. Environ., 1_4, 1013-1016 (1980).

Stolzenburg, T.R. and A.W.  Andren.  Mater, Air, and Soil  Poll.,  15,
     263-270  (1981).

Ton, N., J. Eastman, and H. Sievering.   Dry Loading Collection  Efficiency
     of Sulfate and Soil  Aerosol by a Passive  Sampler, Amer. Geophysical
     Union Spring Meeting,  Baltimore, MA, June, 1983.

Williams,  R.M.  A Model for the  Dry Deposition of Particles to  Natural
     Water Surfaces, RER Division #8106, Argonne National Lab,  Argonne,
     111.  ANL/ERC-81-06 (1981).

Winchester, J.W. and G.D. Nifong.  Water, Air, Soil Poll  'n., 1_,  50-61  (1971),

Wu,  J.  J. Phys. Oceanogr.,  9, 802-814 (1979).

-------
                      53
                 APPENDIX A

            LAKE BREEZE EFFECTS ON
PARTICLE SIZE SPECTRA AND SULFATE CONCENTRATION
              OVER LAKE MICHIGAN
                      by
    Richard L.  Hughes and Herman Si evenng
         Environmental  Science Program
         College of  Applied  Sciences
          Governors State University
         Park Forest South,  IL   60466

-------
                                  54
                                ABSTRACT



         Aircraft flights over southern Lake Michigan in September



of 1977 and May of 1978 conducted during which meterological  and



size-distributed particle data were gathered.  An anomalous local



maximum of the particle distribution in the 0.3 - 0.4 ym diameter



range occurred on those days during which a lake breeze took place.



This effect contributes more than 20 percent increase in the



particle volume across the 0.2 - 0.5 ym diameter range.   Evidence



is presented suggesting that SOp gas to sulfate particle conversion



may be responsible.

-------
                                    55
1.   Introduction
              The distribution by size  of atmospheric  particles  is  an
    important variable in the various aspects  of  air pollution,  particularly
    in the lowest layers of the atmosphere (Meszaros,  1977).   The size
    distribution of sulfate particles is  particularly  important  in  the
    investigation of acid rain in the vicinity of and  over  the Great
    Lakes.  It has only recently been realized, beginning with the  work
    of Winchester and Nifong (1972),  that dry  deposition of atmospheric
    particles constitutes a major source  of certain pollutants to large
    water bodies such as Lake Michigan.   Thus,  until the last  decade,
    there had been few in situ investigations  of  particle characteristics
    over water.
              Early measurements of  size  spectra  over  natural  water
    surfaces  were reported by Junge  (1972), who observed the typical
    -3 power  law distribution.   Bridgeman (1979)  has measured  particle
    size spectra over the midwest.   Measurements  over  Lake  Michigan
    were not  the primary focus of that  study,  but one  over-lake  flight
    was made  using instruments very  similar to  those used in this study.
    Extinction coefficients indicated the presence of  extremely  clean
    air and bore some resemblance to rural  air  extinction coefficients.
    Most evidence suggests that in the  range 0.1  < diameter (d)  < 10 ym,
    the number distribution is bimodal  with maxima around d =  0.1 - 0.3 vm
    and d = 5.0 - 8.0 ym (Whitby,  1973).    But, as  pointed out by  Whitby
    (1978), this modality is  only marginally visible in the number
    distribution,  and is most evident in  the surface area and  volume
    distributions.   In  connection with  the  Great  Lakes Atmospheric
    Loading Experiment  (GALE),  measurements of size spectra, along  with
 '   other  data,  were gathered aboard an airborne  platform in 1977 and
    1978 over the southern basin  of Lake  Michigan.

-------
                                 56

Instrumentation

       Measurements were taken aboard a Beechcraft Queen Air aircraft

provided by the Research Aviation Facility of the National  Center for

Atmospheric Research.   The aircraft departed from Midway airport and,

upon reaching the lake, proceeded at a low altitude (usually 30 m) to

the midlake sampling site, 87° OCf W, 42° OCf N.   Vertical  soundings

were taken in a square spiral  "box" pattern over this site, over a

point halfway to shore, 87° 15  W, 41° 52' N (referred to as the halfway

point) and, in 1978, over a near-shore site, a City of Chicago water

intake crib, 87° 32" W, 41° 4?' N (see Figure 1.).  The lowest data

were taken at an altitude of 15 m and the soundings extended through,

about 2000 m.  Flight times were approximately 0700-0900 CDT,  1100-1400

CDT, and occasionally 1600-1800 CDT during September 26-30 of 1977 and

May 17, 19, 22-24, and 26 of 1978.

       Particle size spectra were obtained from the Active Scattering

Aerosol Spectrometer (ASAS) manufactured by Particle Measuring Systems,

Boulder, Colorado.  The instrument measures light scattering internal

to the cavity of a He-Ne laser.  By a system of precision optics and

photomultipliers, the absolute number of particles in each of 60 size

channels is recorded.   It is described by Schuster and  Knollenberg

(1972).  The  instrument used in  1977 gathered data in the range

0.23 < d <  30.0 ym.  Ambient air was drawn through an approximately

isokinetic  sampler  (see de Pena, et al.,  1975 for  description) and

transmitted along a length of copper tubing to the intake port of the

ASAS.   Intake was flow-controlled  using  aircraft  Venturis to produce
                                            o      1
an  inflight sampling rate of 0.28  ±  0.20 cm  sec   .  The number  of

-------
                                    57
    counts in each of the 60 size channels, along with various meteorological
    data were recorded each second onto magnetic tape by the Aircraft
    Recording Instrument System (Glaser, 1973).   Location was determined
    by an inertia! navigation system.   Height above 500 m was determined
    by a pressure altimeter, and below 300 m by a radio altimeter.   A
    weighted average of the values from these two instruments was used
    between 300 m and 500 m.
           During 1978 a slightly different configuration was used.   The
    ASAS used during this period gathered data in the range 0.11  <  d < 3.0 ym
    and the copper tubing was somewhat longer and was heated to significantly
    reduce water vapor contribution to ASAS number counts.   Interpretation
    was aided by National Weather Service surface and upper air data.
    Surface high volume filter, bulk water and .meteorological data  were
    also gathered in connection with the GALE at mid-Lake Michigan  in
    1977 and at the near-shore site in 1978 (Sievering, et al., 1979).
3.   Calculation of Particle Size Spectra
           The instrumentation used and the experimental  setup produced
    several  consequences which made the calculation of the size spectra
    less than straightforward.   It was feared that the length of  copper
    tubing used to transmit the air sample would cause some loss  of measured
    aerosol  counts.   To investigate this, the original tubing from  the
    two aircraft configurations was used to sample air which was  drawn
    through  the approximately isokinetic sampler in a wind tunnel at
    Particle Measuring Systems in Boulder,  Colorado.   The spectra thus
    obtained were compared with spectra obtained without  the copper tubing
    and the  loss of aerosol  as a function of size was calculated.   In  the
    spectra  that follow, the raw number count was multiplied by the factor

-------
                                    58
    required  to compensate for this estimated loss.  These correction
    factors are shown  in  Figure 2.  Since the ambient air in Boulder,
    Colorado  was  used  to  obtain these curves their applicability is
    uncertain, but  it  should  be noted that the correction factor for
    particles with  diameters  less  than 0.5 ym is quite small.  Our attention
    was  principally directed  to this size range.
          The 60 sampling channels are  grouped into four slightly over-
    lapping "size ranges" of  15 channels each.  Because of the manner of
    operation of  the ASAS, it is possible for a size range to systematically
    measure number  counts which are higher or lower than neighboring or
    overlapping  size ranges.   This was observed to occur in  the larger of-
    the  two size  ranges  in 1977 and the  second smallest of the four size
    ranges in 1978. The signal-to-noise ratio is  higher for the larger-radius
    channels  in  any of these  size  ranges,  so the groups with anomalously
    high readings were empirically matched with the overlapping larger-
    radius channels of a neighboring  size  range.   As a  result, number
    counts in the anomalous  range  were multiplied  by 0.08 for the  1977
    data and  0.33 for  the 1978 data to bring it roughly in line with
    neighboring  ranges.   Because  of this,  while relative differences
    between individual samples and relative  numbers within a group retain
    their validity, absolute numbers  are suspect.
4.   Description  of  Data
           Five  flights in  September  of  1977 and  seven  in May of  1978 were
    chosen for concentrated  study. These  flights  were  selected  so as to
    obtain data  from air which had a  direct  trajectory  from  an  urban  area
    (September)  and from air which either  clearly  underwent  lake  breeze

-------
                                 59
circulations or from that which did not (May).  Table 1 presents
certain meteorological parameters measured at the lake's surface
during these flights.  Temperature difference between 5 m height and
the surface was obtained using an infrared thermometer.  Distributions
of aerosol number were in general unremarkable, following a typical
-3 power curve described by Junge.  In the range above 2.0 ym diameter,
particle counts were too few to accurately locate the large particle
size maxima in the bimodal surface and volume distributions.  With
an exception yet to be discussed the small particle size maxima were
near d = 0.2 ym.  Total particle volume in the range 0.11 < d < 2.0 ym
                                               -12   3   -3
near the surface was in the range 10 to 20 x 10    cm  cm   in
September, 1977 and 20 to 30 x 10"12 cm3 cm"3 in May, 1978.  Total
                                       _3
particle number counts were 15 to 90 cm   in September and 200 to 600
cm~  in May.
       Three of the May flights (18, 22, and 25) had a spectral anomaly
in the form of a local maximum located within the range 0.3 < d < 0.4 ym.
The appearance in the number spectrum is that of a minor "bump" (see
Figure 3).  This bump represents an increase in the particle number count
                      _3
on the order of 100 cm  ; this is an increase of about 30 percent in the
0.2 < d < 0.5 ym range over the number of particles counted in this
range when the bump is absent (see Figure 3).  As mentioned above, this
type of local  maximum is more obvious in the volume distribution plots.
Figure 4 shows the volume distribution corresponding to the number
spectrum plot in Figure 3.   The Whitby (1978) grand average continental
distribution has been forced to fit the small and large particle ends
of the distribution for the 1242 - 1245 CDT, 60 m altitude, near-shore
data on May 18, 1978.   For this case,  then,  the bump referred to above

-------
                                 60
is evident in the 0.25 < d < 0.5 ym range.   Clearly in this case, and
quite often otherwise, the d ^ 0.4 ym maximum exceeds the average
continental distribution volume maximum at 0.3 ym.   The bump invariably
represents an increase in particle volume of more than 20 percent in
this range.  The bump is often quite narrow in range (< 0.2 ym),
suggesting a single source for these particles.   Since surface area
and volume affect the reactivity and the air/water exchange of particles,
the anomaly may be of singificance to sulfate formation and particle
loading of the lake.
       The three flights on which these bumps were observed (May  18, 22,
and 25) took place during lake breeze episodes.   The aircraft made it
possible to directly observe the lake breeze cells (see Figure 5).
Backward-in-time trajectories were calculated for all experimental
periods by a process described in Sievering, et  al.  (1980).  These
trajectories, shown in Figure 6, also support the existence of a  lake
breeze on May 18, 22, and 25, 1978.
       There were some differences in the appearance of the bumps on
these three days.  On May 22 and May 25, the bumps usually appeared
in the range 0.35 < d < 0.45 ym, but on May 18 the bump also extended
below 0.35 ym.  The bump was always found in air samples at altitudes,
of 30 to 60 m above the surface on the three lake breeze days. This
seems to indicate that the domain of this anomalous distribution  was
spatially continuous in near-surface layers.  On May 22 the bump  was
found up to altitudes of 600 m while on May 18 and May 25 it was
found at altitudes near to 110 m and a second discrete region was
found between 220 and 800 m.  The data at higher altitudes is more

-------
                                 61




sparse because of both the flight track and  the greater length of



constant altitude data needed to obtain statistical  significance in



particle counts at higher altitudes.



       The September flights, in contrast,  showed only a half-dozen



isolated instances of a local maximum in the 0.35 <  d < 0.45 ym range.



This was true despite the fact that all of  these September flights



occurred when there was a wind directly from the heavily populated



area to the west and southwest of the sampling area.   That the urban



plume was in fact sampled during the September flights is indicated



by a time plot of the total  aerosol  volume  detected  over the lake



(Figure 7).   The abrupt increase, if extrapolated back in time using



aircraft-measured mean wind  speeds,  occurred in air  that would have



left the industrialized western shore of the lake around 0745 to



0815 CDT, just as the rush hour was  occurring.   The  aircraft measurements



indicate that the wind direction was steady  during the 0730 to 0930



CDT period; i.e., the flow was direct rather than meandering.  It



appears that advection from  an urban area is not sufficient to produce



the spectral anomaly by itself.



       Surface high1 volume air samplers equipped with three-stage



cascade impactors were in place at a 13m height above the lake surface



at the near-shore crib site  during May of 1978.  Reliable data were



available during only four of the six May flights discussed above,  but



for these days, the ratio of fine (d < 1 urn) to coarse (d > 2 ym)



particles was larger during  the lake breeze  events perhaps resulting



from greater coarse particle deposition during the long over-lake



return fetch.  Additionally, it was found that concentrations of Pb, V,



Zn, and Cu  (metals especially associated with anthropogenic sources)

-------
                                      62
     were enhanced on the lake-breeze days (see Sievering and Dolske, 1982).
     The high volume filters were analyzed for sulfates and phosphates as
     well as trace metals.  The ratio of sulfate to certain of these trace
     metals and to phosphate is shown in Table 2.   These ratios were averaged
     for the two lake breeze and the two non-lake breeze days.   It is evident
     that in the comparison of at least these four  periods, sulfates were
     strongly enhanced with respect to Pb, Fe, Mn,  and P-P04 and somewhat
     enhanced with respect to Zn.
5.   Discussion
            The appearance of a local  maximum of restricted size range in
     an otherwise ordinary particle spectrum suggests a single  source type.
     Two of these anomalous cases  occurred when there was no direct surface
     trajectory from an urban area, as determined by the back-trajectory
     analyses referred to above.   But on those non-lake breeze  days when
     the analyses indicated either urban or non-urban source regions the
     anomalies were absent.   Thus, the lake breeze  is sufficient in some
     cases to cause an otherwise normal  particle distribution to be perturbed.
     Lyons and Olsson (1973), among others, have pointed out the manner in
     which a spiral-shaped lake breeze can cause a  re-circulation of
     pollutants carried over the lake by a return flow.  These  pollutants
     are then brought back to shore by the surface  lake breeze.   They
     mention that a size-sorting of the aerosol was detected, which they
     attributed to gravitational  fallout of larger  particles.   In the case
     they reported, this caused an augmentation of  the smaller  aerosol  near
     the surface, similar to that suggested by the  high volume  air sampler
     data of Table 2.

-------
                                63

        Lyons  and  Olsson  (1972)  found that particles in the lake


 breeze  return  flow penetrated more than 20 km over-lake in a well-


 developed  lake breeze cell.  This would be consistent with the occurrence


 of  the  spectral bump found 30 - 50 km from shore.


        The fact that the bump was not present after the short (< 2 hr)


 direct  fetch  from the Chicago area suggests that the lake breeze itself


 contains a mechanism for the sulfate enhancement noted above.  Particles


 the size of those in the bump (0.2 < d < 0.5 ym) are often associated


 with the contribution of sulfate particles to the accumulation particle


 mode (Whitby,  1978).  Recent work by McMurry and Wilson (1982) in


 high humidity environments such as that over Lake Michigan shows that


 particulate sulfate predominates diameters of 0.3 to 0.5 ym whereas


 low humidity environments produce sulfate particles less than 0.2 ym.


 Airborne measurements of particle size distributions in power plant


 plumes  conducted  by Hobbs, et al.  (1979), indicate that an increase

                                                                o
 in 0.3  to 0.5^».m  diameter particles on the order of 10 to 20 cm   above


 ambient concentrations could be expected after a few hours travel time,


 presumably from gas-to-particle conversion mechanisms.   If the percentage


 increase is applied to the concentration of particles normally present

 at mid-Lake Michigan in the 0.3 <  d < 0.5 ym range, an  increase of 100
  _3
 cm   is found which is consistent  with the magnitude of the bump


 described above.   It should be noted that an urban plume would afford


more particulate surface area for  heterogeneous, catalyzed reactions


than particles from an isolated power plant plume.   Wilson,  et al.  (1977),


have shown  that the transformation rate  of gaseous  sulfur  to  particulate


sulfur  was  less than  2 percent per hr in  the Labadie power plant plume

-------
                                64
until  mixing with the St.  Louis urban plume,  at which point
transformation rates increased to as much as  5 percent per hr.
       Lyons (1975) has described the expected range of wind speeds
and the extent of a Lake Michigan lake breeze cycle.  Using these
estimates (which were consistent with the aircraft observations for
May 18, 22, and 25) and assuming subsidence to take place about 30 km
from shore, a parcel will  take 6 to 10 hr to  complete a lake breeze
cycle.  Assuming a mean travel time of 8 hr and a mean SOp to SO,
transformation rate of 2 percent per hr, well over 10 percent of the
SOp in the Chicago source region will have been transformed to SO,
upon arrival at the crib site.  Direct transport from the urban
shoreline to the crib site would produce well less than 1 percent
transformation.  To complete the S02 to SO. transformation calculation,
the rate at which growth occurs through the particle size spectrum
is needed.  McMurry and Wilson (1982) show that sulfate particle
growth per unit of time    Dp/dt) is about 0.02 ym hr~  and that
this growth is essentially independent of the initial particle size.
A nominal growth time for growth of an additional 0.3 pm in diameter
is then about 15 hr.  Although this time is about twice as long as the
8 hr mean lake breeze travel time it should be noted that the major, ,
Chicago region S02 sources are not at the lake's shoreline.  These
sources, clustered in the vicinity of Joliet, IL, were from 3 to 5 hr
removed from the lakeshore  (synoptic flow was from the southwest) on
the days of interest  (Table 1).  Further, the 8 hr mean lake breeze
travel time would afford an additional  sulfate particle growth of 0.1
to 0.2 ym which  is exactly  the size  increment needed to explain the
shift  in the peak volume distribution from the non-lake breeze cases

-------
                                  65



    of 0.2 ym to those lake breeze cases  for which the volume peak occurred



    in the d > 0.3 ym range.   It would appear that no anomalous bump



    appeared during the September flights because  of the short travel



    time from SOp sources.



6.   Summary



           Data gathered over Lake Michigan aboard an aircraft during  lake



    breeze events revealed  the occurrence of an  anomalous local maximum in



    the aerosol size distribution in the  0.3 - 0.4 ym diameter particle



    size range.  It is suggested that the re-circulation of the lake



    breeze provides a material contribution to this anomaly, perhaps



    providing sufficient time for gas-to-particle  conversion to take



    place.  Sulfate fractions appear to be enhanced relative to other



    chemicals during those  lake breeze events sampled.



7.   Acknowledgements



           Appreciation is  extended  to the personnel of the Research



    Aviation Facility and the Computing Facility of the National Center



    for Atmospheric Research.  Assistance in the manual plotting of soundings



    and trajectories was provided by Mehul Dave, Patric McCoy, and Vic



    Jensen.  Gratitude is expressed  to Dixie Butz  for her preparation  of



    the manuscript and to John Eastman for his review of a draft.



           This work was supported by the U.S. Environmental Protection



    Agency under grants R00530101 and R00542101.

-------
                               66
References
Bridgeman, Howard A., 1979:  Aerosol
       and Rural Air at Milwaukee in
       18, 105-115.
                              Extinction at 500 nm in Urban
                              April 1976.  J.  Appl.  Meteor.,
de Pena, J.A., J.M. Norman, and D.W. Thompson, 1975:
       Sampler for Continuous Airborne Measurements.
       Poll. Control Assoc.,, Boston.
                                               Isokinetic
                                               Proc.  68th
                       Air
Glaser, Walter, 1973:  The Airs III Data System.
       Technology, March, 61-66.
                                           Atmospheric
Hobbs, Peter V., Dean A. Hegg, Mark W. Eltgroth, and Lawrence F.
       Radke, 1979:  Evolution of Particles in the Plumes of Coal-
       Fired Power Plants--!.  Deductions from Field Measurements.
       Atmos. Environ., 1_2, 935-951.

Junge, C.E., 1972:  Our Knowledge of the Physico-Chemistry of Aerosols
       in the Undisturbed Marine Environment.   J. Geophys. Res., 77,
       5183-5200.
Lyons, Walter A., 1975:  Turbulent
       in Shoreline Environments.  	
       Environmental Impact Analysis,
       Mass.  American Meteorological

Lyons, Walter A. and Lars E. Olsson,
       Transport in the Chicago Lake
       Assoc.. 22, 876-881.
                            Diffusion and Pollutant Transport
                            Lectures on Air Pollution and
                               Duane A.
                               Society,
     Haugen,
     296 pp.
  ed., Boston,
                              1972:  Mesoscale Air Pollution
                              Breeze.  J.  Air Poll.  Control
Lyons, Walter A. and Lars E. Olsson, 1973:  Detailed Mesometeorologica
                      Pollution Dispersion in the Chicago Lake Breeze.
                       101, 387-403.
Studies of Air
Mon. Wea.  Rev..
                                     Detailed Mesometeorological
Meszaros, Agnes, 1977:  On the Size Distribution of Atmospheric
       Aerosol Particles of Different Composition.  Atmos. Environ., V\_
       1075-1081.

Schuster, B.G. and R. Knollenberg, 1972:  Detection and Sizing of Small
       Particles in an Open Cavity Laser.  Appl. Opt., 11, 1515-1529.
Sievering, H., M. Dave, D.A.
       Experimental Study of
                      Dolske, R.L.
                      Lake Loading
Hughes, P.
By Aerosol
       Deposition in the Southern Lake Michigan Basin.
McCoy, 1979:  An_
Transport and Dry
       U.S. Environmental
       4-79-016.  180 pp.
                   Protection Agency Pulbication
              Chicago, IL.
              No.  EPA-905/
Sievering, H., M. Dave, D.A. Dolske, and P. McCoy, 1980:  Trace Element
       Concentrations over Mid-Lake Michigan as a Function of Meteorology
       and Source Region.  Atmos. Environ., 14, 39-53.

-------
                                67


Sievering, H. and D.A. Dolske 1982:  Chemical  Elements in Atmospheric
       Aerosols Over Southern Lake Michigan:   The Contribution of the
       Lake Aerosol Source.  (Submitted to Journal  of Great Lakes
       Research.)

Whitby, K.T., 1978:  The Physical Characteristics of Sulfur Aerosols.
       Atmos. Environ., 12, 135-159.

Whitby, K.T., 1973:  On the Multimodal Nature of Atmospheric Aerosol
       Size Distribution, presented at VIII Int. Conf. on Nucleation,
       Leningrad, U.S.S.R.

Wilson, William E., Robert  J. Charlson, Rudolf B. Husar, Kenneth Whitby,
       and Donald Blumenthal, 1977:  Sulfates  in the Atmosphere, Research
       Triangle Park, North Carolina.   U.S. Environmental Protection
       Agency Publication No. EPA-600/7-77-021.
                                       1
Winchester, T.W. and C.D. Nifong, 1971:  Water Pollution in Lake
       Michigan by Trace Elements from Pollution Aerosol Fallout.
       Water, Air,  and Soil Poll., 1,  50-64.

-------
Date
Sept 26
Sept 26
Sept 27
Sept 27
Sept 27
May 17
May 18
May 19
May 22
May 24
May 25
May 25
Height of Thermal
Flight Inversion
Times (CDT) Boundary Layer (m)
0645
1641
0639
1120
1636
1130
1130
1145
1133
1130
0715
1145
- 0915
- 1810X
- 0856
- 1344
- 1826
- 1411
- 1252
- 1313
- 1352
- 1419
- 0858
- 1443
None
None
None
None
None
90 - 260
None
5 - 10
10 - 80
80 - 220
110 - 160
5-190
5-m Air Temperature 10-m Height Direction of Backward-
Minus Surface Water Wind Speed in-Time Trajectory
Temperature (°C) (m/s) (+ 15°) From Crib Site.
8.1
5.7
7.2
6.3
5.9
1.3
6.4
4.7
-0.9
-1.9
-
3.2
8.3
6.0
7.4
6.5
6.1
3.5
3.0
3.5
2.2
1.4
-
5.7
270°

250°
300°
310°
15°
45°
100°
30°
5°
-
90°
                                                                                                                CTl
                                                                                                                co
Table 1.  Meteorological parameters measured during September, 1977 and May5 1978.

-------
                        69
                     Lake-Breeze  Events   Non-Lake-Breeze  Events
"S04] / [Pb]
[S04]/[A1]
]S04] / [Zn]
[S04J/[Fe]
[S04J/[Mn]
[so4]/[p-po4]
61
52
94
4.2
67
1605
38
50
64
1.7
20
808
Table 2.   Ratio of sulfate mass  concentration  ((SOJ)  to mass
          concentration of certain  trace metals  and  phosphate
          for two lake breeze (May  18  and 25)  and  two  non-
          lake breeze (May 17 and 24)  periods.

-------
                                  70
                            Figure Captions
1.  Location of Sampling sites.
2.  Sample tubing loss correction factors as a  function  of  particle
    diameter.
3.  DN/D (log d) as a function of particle diameter.   Straight  line
    is -3 Jungian  slope, included for reference.   18  May,  1978,
    12:42    - 12:45    CDT altitude  60 m, nearshore shows  the  "bump"
    whereas 18 May, 1978, 12:12     -  12:19    CDT  altitude  1900 m,
    midlake does not.
4.  Same as Figure 3 except the  plots are of DV/D  (log d) as  a  function
    of particle diameter.
5.  Wind directions measured by  aircraft over Lake Michigan during a
    lake breeze event.
6.  Backward-in-time trajectories on  May 18, 22, and 25,  1978.
7.  Total particle volume measured in the range 0.11 < d  <  2.0  ym as
    a function of time.

-------
                           71
  43° 00'
o
o
o
00
CO
  42° 30'
o
ro
o
1^
CO
O
O
o
h
00
O
rO
o
CD
00
                  LAKE MICHIGAN
O
O
o
(£>
CO
  42°00
                MIDLAKE
                      HALFWAY POINT
  CHICAGO •
  CRIB SITE
                                   0   10  20  30  40  50
  4I°30
         Figure 1.  Location of sampling sites.

-------
b
CO
b
   CORRECTION FACTOR
^          CTI          C55
bob
                                                       O
                      00
                      0
                      I
                      I
I
           B se SJO^DEJ. UOL^DBJUOO  sso|_  6uiqn^  9[dujps
                            ZL

-------
                                    73
5000 •
                  I	
Whitby Grand Average
Continental Dist. FIT
                                                                May 18, 1978
   1

 0.5-^
                                           12:42 - 12:45 CDT
                                           60 m altitude, nearshore
                                                  12:12- 12:19 CDT
                                                  1900 m altitude, midlake-
 0.1
                        Junge
                        -3 slope
     TT~
      0.1
       —r~
        0.2
0.3    0.4
0.5    0.7
  D,yum
1.0
            Figure 3.  DN/D (log d)  as  a  function of particle diameter.
                      Straight line is  -3  Jungian slope, included for
                      reference.   18 May,  1978, 12:42 - 12:45 CDT altitude
                      60 m, nearshore  shows  the "bump" whereas 18 May 1978,
                      12:12 - 12:19 CDT  altitude 1900 m, midlake does not.

-------
                                       74
   ioo H
m
E   50-!
o

I
Q
D)  10-
                                                                  May 18, 1978
                                                        12:42- 12:45 CDT
                                                        60 m altitude, nearshore

     5-J
    0.1-J
          T
          0.1
                                 Whitby Grand Average
                                 Continental  Dist. FIT
T
0.2
0.3
1
0.4
 I  I   I  I I
0.5    0.7     1.0

  D,yum
            Figure 4.  Same as Figure  3 except  the plots are of DV/D (log d)
                      as a function of particle  diameter.

-------
                                75
r
800


850


900


950
960
970
980
99C
100C
MB
Aircraft-measured wind directions -
May 25. 1978 1145-1330 CDT ^
I = Northward w

-
-
-

-
nd \
\
\
i
1 ^ /
\ ^
\ ^
7 • t
t f
I t 1 -
N' t
: ^ , ! :
X N \ / -1
_ -«-
	 CRIE
i *"" HALFWAY | MIDLAKEl
Figure  5.   Wind  directions  measured  by  aircraft  over  Lake  Michigan
           during a  lake  breeze  event.

-------
                           76
Figure  6a.   Backward-in-time  trajectories on  May  18,  22,
            and  25,  1978.

-------
-5
ro
en
cr
                 May 22

-------
-s
ro
                May 25
c»

-------
                                  79
   34


   32


   30


   28


   26
   24
C\j
o
x 22
en

I 20
u

^
   18
   16

LL
5
O = Sept. 26, 1977

A = Sept. 27,1977
                               I
        6:30        7:00        7:30       8.00
                                TIME (CDT)
                              8:30
9:00
          Figure 7.   Total particle volume measured in the  range
                      0.11 <  d  < 2.0 ym  as  a function of time.

-------
                                   80


                              APPENDIX  B



                          SHORT COMMUNICATION



             Chemical Uniformity of Atmospheric Aerosol

                 Its Violation at a Mid-Lake Erie Site
                                  bv
              H. Sievering, D.A. Dolske, and V.E. Jensen

                        Environmental Sciences
                      College of Applied Sciences
                      Governors State University
                    Park Forest South, IL   60466
                                  USA
                               ABSTRACT

     The hypothesis of elemental  mass uniformity of continental  aerosol

is not supported by data collected over the Great Lakes.   The twofold

higher sulfate concentration in air over Lake Erie compared with that

over Lake Michigan may be the dominant factor in producing the compositional

nonuniformity.

-------
                                   81





     Peirson et al .  (1974) observed a uniformity in the  elemental



composition of aerosol   at eight locations  throughout the United Kingdom



(UK).  Rahn (1976)  also noted a striking uniformity in relative elemental



composition in remote areas of the world; a similar uniformity has been



observed in urban (Israel, 1974) and rural  (Stolzenburg  and Andren, 1981)



areas of the United  States.  Rahn (1976) has suggested that urban, rural



and remote continental  aerosol  types should all  display  the same relative



proportions of elements.  Further, it has been proposed  (Stolzenburg



and Andren, 1981) that simple dilution can  account for most of the observed



mass concentration  differences  between remote continental  and urban



aerosols.  Taken together these arguments will here be called the



compositional  uniformity hypothesis.  This  hypothesis is tested below



against two aerosol/elemental data bases gathered over the Great Lakes.



     Great Lakes sampling and analysis methods have been published



previously (Sievering et al., 1980) and will  be  restated only briefly.



Aerosol particulate  matter was  collected on three-part cellulose filters



in a three-stage cascade impactor.  This configuration provided fine



(diameter, r < 0.5  ym)  and coarse (r > 1 ym) particulate fractions for



subsequent elemental  mass analysis by inductively coupled argon plasma



emission spectroscopy (ICAP)  and for sulfate mass analysis by the  BaSO»



turbidimetric  method.  Recovery studies indicate > 90% for all  except



Al, for which  50-70% recoveries were determined.  Al  concentrations



determined by  ICAP were enhanced by a factor of  60°/ to compensate  for



poor recovery.  Gravimetric analysis for total aerosol mass was also



performed.  Shipboard sampling  was performed using a  boom approximately
5 m ahead of the ship's bow; the individual  filter sets  consisted



of air volumes from 200 to 700 m .   A light-scattering device,



the active scattering aerosol  spectrometer (ASAS), was used to

-------
                                  82
monitor the in situ number concentration distributions  for the  0.1-  to
3.5-ym diameter size range.  Meteorological  parameters  were monitored
aboard ship.  These data, in conjunction with land-based meteorological
data, afforded the construction of back-trajectories that will  be described
later in this paper.  Great Lakes data considered here  were obtained on
Lake Erie during the summer of 1979 at 81°30'W, 4?°00'N and on  Lake  Michigan
during the summer of 1977 at 87°00'W and 42°00'N (see large + symbols in
Figure 1).  Both sites are from 40 to 100 km removed from shoreline  aerosol
sources.  The Lake Michigan site was only 40 to 50 km from, and often
downwind of, the Chicago urban complex whereas the Cleveland area was
about 70 km from, and less often upwind of, the Lake Erie site.
     Comparison of the mass percents (i.e., percentage  of total aerosol
mass) for each of seven elements observed by Peirson et al. (1974--Britain),
King et al. (1976--Cleveland), the 1964-75 U.S. urban mean (Israel,  1974),
Stolzenburg and Andren (1981—U.S. rural), and the Lakes Michigan and
Erie data sets  (after corrections for poor Al recovery) are shown in Tab-le 1 .
With the occasional deviation of Na the decreasing mass order of the
elements is Fe, Al, Pb, Na, Zn, Mn, and Cu for all locations except the
Lake Erie data set.   In this  last case  the order is  Fe, Zn, Al  , Cu, Pb,
and  Mn, the Zn and  Cu relative percents being especially high.   Scrutiny
of  this last column of Table  1 indicates the soil source may have
contributed a full  order of magnitude less to Lake  Erie aerosol mass
and  chemical character compared with the other locations;  the mass
percents  for Al and Fe  (largely soil-derived elements)  are tenfold
lower  in  the Lake  Erie case.  Wet soil  conditions and washout  by rain
showers  in  the  vicinity of and over  Lake Erie  during and  before ship
outings  is  probably the  best  explanation for  the  very low  soil contribution.

-------
                                   83


                                             -3
However, the relatively high value of 35 yg m   for the total aerosol


mass observed over Lake Erie does not readily support the notion that

a major source such as soil was so lacking.  This dichotomy may be

                                                         _ O
explained by the Lake Erie sulfate (SO.) mass of 9.6 yg m~  versus

only 5.4 yg m   over Lake Michigan; the greater sulfate mass over Lake


Erie may have sufficiently offset the low soil  source contribution to

                      _3
cause the only 10 yg m   total  aerosol  mass difference over the two


lakes.


     Can the depleted soil source explain the Lake Erie data set's


violation of the compositional  uniformity hypothesis?  Closer scrutiny


of the Great Lakes data is required.   Table 2 presents a comparative

listing of enrichment factors (EF) for the Lakes Erie and Michigan and


UK data sets (including sulfate), and the mass  percents and fine/coarse


ratios (i.e., ratio of elemental  mass concentration in the aerosol  of


r < 0.5 ym to that in the aerosol of r > 1 ym)  for Lakes Erie and


Michigan.  The enrichment factor is a ratio of ratios; the numerator


is a ratio of trace elemental concentration to  Al  concentration for air,


and the denominator is the same ratio for soil .   Here we use the average

soil ratios given by Bowen (1966), but note that all  values are considered

only approximate.  This is not  only caused by the poor Al  recovery but also


by the fact that local  Ohio soil  dust is probably enriched in Zn, Cu,

Mn, and Pb compared to Bowen's  bulk soil analysis (Stol zenburq, 1982).

The EF Comparison does suggest  that,  ove>" Lake  Erie,  7n and Cu were


enhanced, whereas Mn and Pb were depleted.  Any contribution by a lake


aerosol  source could not have caused  this result (Sievering et al., 1983).


This data set's violation of the compositional  uniformity hypothesis does


not, then, appear to result wholly from the depleted  soil  source.

-------
                              84






     Stolzenburg and Andren (1981)  have shown that local  industrial



sources may cause the contribution  of Fe to the aerosol  mass  to



be greater than that of Al  and, less often, those for Zn and  f1n



to be greater than that for Pb.  This may have been the  cause for



[Fe] > [Al ] in some cases of Table 1.  However, since no  industrial



sources were within 40 km of the Great Lakes sampling sites,  a



combination of more distant anthropogenic sources, transport  and



transformation must have caused Lake Erie EF for Zn and  Cu to be so large



at the same time that EFs for Mn and Pb are so small.



     The Lake Erie data set presents a clear violation of the



compositional uniformity hypothesis, despite the fact that the



fine/coarse ratios for the elements  (except Pb) and also for  sulfate



are essentially the same over both Lakes Michigan and Erie.



Note, however, the more than twofold larger S04 mass percent



contribution over Lake Erie; the SO^ mass concentrations of



9.6 yg m   over Lake Erie and 5.4 yg m~  over Lake Michigan



constitute 27% and 12% of their respective total aerosol masses.



Although no additional chemical analyses were available to



characterize the  Great Lakes aerosol mass, the substantially



greater  S04 contribution to the aerosol mass over  Lake Erie may



provide  an explanation for the observed violation  of the compositional



uniformity hypothesis.   Further data obtained over Lake Erie  provide



clues  in this  regard:  1) aerosol size  and number  distributions



obtained by  the  ASAS and 2) meteorological  back-trajectories.

-------
                                   85
     A simple back-trajectory calculation followed the sampled aerosol

from the Lake Erie ship location back toward shore.   The back-trajectory

procedure druing traverse over water was  calculated  by a height-weighted
                                i
average of the ship's horizontal velocity and a  triangulation  average

of reported wind data at 1000 and  2000 ft from the National  Weather

Service (NWS) upper-level sounding stations  at Buffalo,  New York,
                                i
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, and Flint, Michigan.  When the aerosol  reached

shore, weighted averages of NWS station data were  used to complete  the

back-trajectory.  This overall  back-trajectory approach  has  been  compared
                                I
with seven other trajectory
techni
iques for application to the Lake Erie
data base (Jensen, 1981).   It was! found  to  be  quite  accurate  even
                                 !
relative to complex computer backj-trajectory techniques  such  as  that

of Ferber and Heffter (1977).

     Figure 1 shows the most likely 24-h,  straight-line,  back-trajectories,

More highly time-resolved  trajectories will, of course,  follow a different

path (but reach the same point after 24  h).   The figure  shows 21

trajectories; in four cases out of the 25  filter set samples  obtained
over Lake Erie the meteorological
      setting was too complex (e.g., lake
breeze events) to establish a trajectory.   Note  that numbers  from 1  to

42 appear on Figure 1  next to vertical  bars  of various  lengths.   These

bars are quantitative  indicators  of the relative magnitude  (and  the
                                 !
adjacent numbers qualitative indicators) of the  42 largest  S0~ point

sources (USEPA, 1981)  in the states of Ohio, Indiana, Illinois,  Michigan,

and Wisconsin.  The 10 largest SOU sources  on a  U.S. state-by-state
                                 !                                 I
aggregate basis (Hileman, 1982) a|^e the following (in kilotons yr  ):

Ohio (2600), Pennsylvania (2000), Indiana (1950), Illinois  (1450),

-------
                                   86
Missouri (1300), Texas (1200),  Kentucky (1100),  and  Florida,  Nest



Virginia, and Tennessee (all  1050).   Michigan  at 900 kilotons yr~  ,



Wisconsin and the lower peninsular portion of  Ontario province,  Canada



(both at 650 kilotons yr~ )  are each substantially smaller  SO-  source



areas than Ohio, Pennsylvania,  Indiana, or Illinois.  It  is well  known



that S02 gas is a precursor  for SO,  aerosol.   The back-trajectories  of



Figure 1 show that in all but a few cases (e.g., filter set 1050)



there is a very large SOo contribution (e.g.,  filter sets 1090  and  1170)



to air parcels later sampled over Lake Erie.



     Figure 2 shows a plot of the aerosol number (AN/Ar)  versus  size



(radius, r) for set 1050 averaged across more  than 6-h of ASAS  5-min



sampling periods.  The sloping solid line is  the least-squares  best



fit to the AN/Ar data for 0.13 < r < 1.3 ym.   Figures 3 and 4 are



similar plots but for sets 1090 and 1170.  The slope of the solid  lines



are the following:  for set 1050, -4.2; for 1090, -5.3; and  for 1170,



-5.35.  Junge (1956) calculated that for an aerosol  population  to  be



classified as of natural continental origin the AN/Ar slope  in  this



radius range should equal -4.0.  Other investigators have since shown



that limits of 3.5 to 4.5 are reasonable for classification  as  a natural



continental aerosol population (Israel, 1974).  On this basis the aerosol



distribution for set 1050 may be claimed to be continental, whereas the



distributions for sets 1090 and 1170 are clearly not.  Of the 21 filter



sets for which ASAS data were obtained, only five had slopes  fitting



the above  continental criterion; they  are the five that traversed  the



state of Michigan  (see Figure 1).  The mean AN/Ar slopes  for these five

-------
                                    87
sets  (including 1050) is -4.2 ± 0.2; four of these five sets have


elemental mass percents that fit the compositional uniformity hypothesis.


The mean AN/Ar slopes for the remaining 16 filter sets in the ASAS


group  (including 1090 and 1170) is -5.2 ± 0.4; this is significantly


different from that which characterizes a natural continental aerosol


population.  In all but six of these 16 cases the compositional uniformity


hypothesis is clearly violated.


     The mean SO. concentration for the ten filter sets that do not

                                  _3
violate the hypothesis is 3.8 yg m  ; for the remaining 15 sets the


mean SO. concentration is 11.9 yg m  .   This is especially noteworthy


in light of the fact that the S04 contribution is largely by small


particles as is shown by the fine/coarse ratios in Table 2.  Further,


the example comparison of Figures 3 and 4 with Figure 2 shows that


below 0.2 ym radius the aerosol population is a full  order of magnitude


greater for those sets that violate the hypothesis (sets 1090 and 1170)


than for the set that does not (set 1050).  These data suggest that the


S04 conversion process may be an important contributor to the compositional


nonuniformity observed in the case of the Lake Erie data set.  Certainly


simple dilution can not account for the observed elemental concentration


differences,  since the continental  slope criterion v;ould then be


observed.  In any event, there is a clear enhancement of < 0.2 ym radius


aerosol for those cases when the chemical  uniformity hypothesis is violated.


This in turn suggests that more distant anthropogenic source aerosol


may cause nonuniformity in chemical  composition just as local sources


are known to cause this nonuniformity.   Thus, it does not appear that


chemical uniformity of continental  atmospheric aerosol removed ^100 km


from anthropogenic sources is necessarily to be expected.  Until  further


evidence is found identifying and explaining exceptions to the "rule" as well as

-------
supporting generality of the  chemical  uniformity  hypothesis,  it



should remain a hypothesis  only.

-------
                                  89

                              REFERENCES

Bowen, H.J.M.   Trace Elements in Biochemistry  (Academic  Press,  New York,
     1966).

Ferber, G.J. and J.L.  Heffter.   Development  and  Verification  of the ARL
     Regional-Continental  Transport and  Dispersion  Model  (NOAA  Air Resources
     Lab., Washington, D.C.,  1977).~~~

Hileman, B.  Environ.  Sci .  &  Tech.  16,  323A-327A (1982).

Israel, H.  Trace Elements  in the Atmosphere (Ann Arbor  Science,  Ann
     Arbor, MI, 1974).~

Jensen, V.E.  An Evaluation of Several  Methods of Atmospheric Trajectories
     (Dept. of Geog.,  Northern  Illinois  Univ., DeKalb,  IL,  1981).

Junge, C.E.  Tellus  8, 127-139  (1956).

King, R.B., J.S.Fordyce,  A.C. Antoine,  H.F.  Leibecki,  H.E.  Neustadter,
     and S.M.  Sidik.  J.  Air  Poll.  Cont.  Assoc.  26,  1073-1078 (1976).

Peirson, D.H., P.A.  Cawse,  and  R.S. Cambray.  Nature  251 , 675-679  (1974).

Rahn, K.A.  The Chemical  Composition of  Atmospheric  Aerosol  (Qrad.  School
     of Oceanog., Univ. of  Rhode Island,  Kingston,  RI, 1976).

Sievering, H., M. Dave, D.A.  Dolske, P.L.  Huges, and  P.  McCoy,  1979.  An^
     experimental study of  lake  loading  by aerosol  transport  and  dry
     deposition in the southern  Lake Michigan basin.   EPA-905/4-79-016.

Sievering, H., M. Dave, D.A.  Dolske, and  P.A. McCoy.   Atmos.  Environ. 14,
     39-53 (1980).

Stolzenburg, T.R.(1982).  Trace  element  composition  of local  Ohio  soil
     dust.  Private  communique.

Stolzenburg, T.R. and  A.W.  Andren.   Water, Air,  and  Soil  Poll.  15,  263-270
     (1981 ).

-------
                          TABLE 1.   Percentage  of  Total  Aerosol  Mass for Each of Seven Elements
Element
Fe
Al
Pb
Na
Zn
Mn
Cu
Aerosol
Mass.,
Great Britain
0.9
0.6
0.35
2.5
0.35
0.05
0.04
-45

Clevel
Urban
3.8
2.5
0.65
0.7
0.35
0.1
0.1
115

and
Suburban
3.8
4.0
1.1
0.8
0.55
0.15
0.15
45

U.S. Urban U.S. Rural
1.5 1.8
* 2.0
0.75 0.5
* 0.4
0.65 0.1
0.10 0.06
0.09 0.05
105 40

Lake
Michigan
1.1
0,1 .0
0.5
*
0.2
0.05
0.04
45

Lake
Erie
0.13
-0.1
0.01
*
0.11
0.002 °
0.03
35

*  no data available

-------
TABLE 2.  Aerosol  statistics  for  Lakes  Erie  and  Michigan,  and comparisons  of their
          enrichment factors  with those  observed by Peirson  et al.  over Great Britian
Element
Al
Fe
Pb
Zn
Mn
Cu
SO,
Dry Mass Percent
Erie Michigan
0,0
0
0
0
0
0
27
.1
.13
.01
.11
.002
.03

0
1
0
0
0
0
12
.6
.1
.5
.2
.05
.04

Fine/ Coarse Patio
Erie Michigan
1
1
5
4
2
3
23
.8
.9
.9
.8
.1
.3

1.2
1.6
13
6.1
2.0
3.9
27
Enrichment Factors
Erie Michigan UK
1 1
o,2 . 4 0,2 . 1
o,720 o,3200
0/1500 o,320
o,2 . 0 o,5 . 9
o,l 1 00 o,l 20
n .a . n .a .
1
o,2.
3700
925
9.
165
n .a

9


9

m

-------
Figure  1.   Great Lakes  study  region with the most likely 24-h, straight-line
           back-trajectories  for each of 21 filter set samples.  The 42
           largest SO,,  point  sources in this reqion are also shown.

-------
            10'
            10'
         E

         h_
         O
              0.01
                                 93
                                   f.\
                                     i
                                               . Set # 1050
                                               On 7 Sept. 1319
                                               Off 7 Sept. 1935
0.1
1.0
10.0
Figure  2.   Aerosol  number  versus aerosol radius  for  filter set  #1050,

-------
                                   94
             108
             105
             10"
          I
             10=
              i02
              10
               0.01
                                          JL.
                                               .Set  # 1090
                                               On 17 Oct. 0500
                                               Off 17 Oct. 1157
0.1
1.0
                                                           10.0
Figure  3.   Aeorsol  number versus  aerosol  radius for  filter set  #1090.

-------
                                     95
          10'
          10s
          104
       u
         10=
         102
           0.01
                                              Set # 1170
                                             . On 19 Oct. 0748 .
                                              Off 19 Oct. 1050
0.1
                                         1.0
                                                        10.0
Figure  4.   Aerosol  number  versus  aerosol  radius for filter  set #1170,

-------
                                 96
                             APPENDIX  C

                            TECHNICAL  NOTE
   TRACE ELEMENT PASS-THROUGH FOP CELLULOSE IMRACTOR .SUBSTRATES  AMD
               FILTERS WHEN USED FOR AEROSOL COLLECTION
                  Donald A. Dolske*  and  H. Sievering
                    Environmental Science Program
                     College of Anplied  Science
                     Governors State University
                 Park Forest South,  Illinois   60466
                               ABSTRACT

     Filter papers and impaction substrates made of cellulose fibers,
such as Whatman 41 and Misco P810/252, are of considerable utility in
the collection of aerosol for subsequent trace elenental  analysis.
This experiment evaluated the performance of Misco P810/252 in collecting
trace elements, relative to a co-located standard glass fiber filter
hi-vol  collection.  Sampling was conducted in varying  meteorological
conditions, so that results might be expressed in terms of environmental
variables such as temperature and relative humidity.  The pass-throuqh
factors presented here were derived  from a series of environmental samnles
collected over land and over water.   Overall mean cellulose Mi'sco filter
collection of Pb and Zn was found to be  38% and 32?^                less
than that collected on the alass fiber filter.
      Present address:  Atmospheric Chemistry Section, Illinois Department
of Energy and Natural Resources, State Mater Survey Division, P.O. Box
5050, Station A, Champaign, Illinois   61820.

-------
                                   97



                   EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN AND EXECUTION



     The purpose of the experiment was to compare the collection efficiency



of the Misco cellulose impactor substrates and filter in a modified Sierra



1-, 3-, 6-slot impactor with the assumed near-100-percent collection



efficiency standard type A glass fiber filter.  The problem, restated,



is to determine if the total concentration computed from the sum of



impactor stages 1  and 3, and backup filter, stage 6, can be related



to the total concentration of aerosol  gravimetrically measured with



standard type A glass fiber filters.   This experiment, then, has particular



significance for data of Sievering e_t  aj_. (1980) and Puce e_t aj_. (1976),



since all  trace element and nutrient  data for aerosol  over Lakes Michigan



and Erie were collected using the ,f/isco cellulose media.



     All aerosol  collection was done  with paired flow-controlled hi-vol


      3    -1
(1.1  m  rm'n  ') samplers.  Flow rates  of the samplers were recalibrated



after each group of five sampling runs, approximately one- to two-week



intervals, to assure comparability of  sample volumes.   The samplers were



set up not loss than three meters apart, and were fitted with plastic



exhaust hoses to minimize reentrainment of cooper aerosol shed by pumn



commutators.  One pair of samplers was operated  at the Governors State



University air quality monitoring site from March to August, 1980.   A



second sampler pair collected aerosol  at the city of Chicago 68th Street



crib from June to August, 1980.  A filter holder cassette containing,



in order,  Misco slotted substrates on  stages 1 and 3 and. a 20 by 25



centimeter Misco filter on one hi-vol  sampler; a standard type A glass



fiber  20 by 25 centimeter mat was used on the other sampler.  Behind



each of these filter cassettes, separated by 0.5 centimeters and supported



by fine stainless steel screen, was mounted a "second backup," a type A



glass fiber mat, of Gelmari Spectrograde material.  The Spectrograde filters

-------
                                  98
collect aerosol  as the standard type A, but have a lower trace  element
blank.  In all,  then, there were six parts to each concurrently collected
set of filters:  the three-stage Misco impactor/backup with its  spectroqrade
second backup, and the type A filter with its Spectrograde backup.   These
parts were designated Ml, M3, M6, S^M, and A, SRA, resnectively.
Sets of filters  were exposed for periods ranging from 24 to  96  hours,
depending on variability of meteorological conditions over the  sampling
period and degree of pollution loading prevailing.  In general, an  effort
was made to conduct sampling on a given set during similar conditions,  so
that parameters  derived for that sample could be related to  meteorological
variables.  Each fifth sample was a field blank, in which the filters
were carried through the entire procedure, except that the hi-vol  motors
remained off during the exposure period, usually 24 hours for the  field
blanks.  Several unexnosed blanks were also used, where the  filters were
carried through all of the procedure except mounting on the  hi-vols.
In all, 37 samples and 16 blanks were collected during the course  of the
experiment.
      Continuous monitoring of ambient temperature, wind speed, wind
direction, barometric pressure, and relative humidity was done  at  Governors
State throughout the experiment.  In addition, wind speed, wind direction,
temperature, and relative humidity were recorded hourly at the  68th Street
Crib while sampling was being conducted there.  These data were  averaged
for each period during which a set of  filters was being exposed.  ~!"he
mean values were then used to characterize each period.  At the Governors
State site, two optical particle-counting devices continuously monitored
particulate levels.  Results fron an automatic condensation nuclei  counter
(Environment One Corn. Rich 100) and an integrating nephelometer (Meteorology
Research  Inc. Model 1550) were similarly  averaged over each sampling period.

-------
                                  99





     Analysis of the various filter stages followed several  different



procedures.  The Ml, M3, and M6 stages were first trimmed with Teflon-



coated stainless steel  scissors to renove the unexposed edges.  The



exposed portions were then placed in fused quartz conbustion boats



which had been acid washed with Ultrex HC1.  The boats were  then run in



a low temperature oxygen plasma asher (Plasmod Inc.) at 75 watts PF



for about 24 hours, i.e., until all  the cellulose filter material  was



oxidized.  The residue  was then brought into solution with hot 12N Ultrex



HC1 , and volune-normalized with distilled deionized water.  The SPA and



SGM stages were gravimetrically analyzed for total  aerosol mass, and



then were trimmed of unexposed parts, cut into strips, and leached in



a boiling HC1 + HNCL bath for 60 minutes.  These filters were then



rinsed with distilled deionized water and the leachate brought to  a



normalizing volume.  The type A filters were -gravimetrically analyzed



for total aerosol mass  only.  The liquid samples resulting from the



preparation of the Ml,  M3, M6, SGA, and SGM filters were then analyzed



by atomic absorption spectrophotometry for Pb, Zn,  and Fe.








                                RESULTS



     As can be seen in  Table 1, the overall nean concentrations of Pb,



Zn, and Fe fall within  the range of concentrations  for these elements



in aerosol in the Great Lakes region and elsev;here.   Samples in



this study were collected on a routine 24- to 96-h  run-time  basis,



while the overlake samples'  run-times were much shorter, usually 3- to 6-h,



The longer run-times for the pass-through experiment were necessary in



order to collect sufficient material on the second  stage backup filters,

-------
                                100

SGA and SGM.   Even  with  the  extended  run-times,  Fe  on  these  stages was

quite often below analytical  detection limits.   (NOTE:  detection  limits,

laboratory and field blanks  for the  pass-through samples  were  comparable

to the values reported for Lake Michigan samoling [Sievering e_t a]_. ,  1980]

     Still, the pass-through factors  (RTF)  reported here,

                     '
          PTF =
                     ,
                 Ml ,3, 6    SGM

should be representative of the percentage anounts of material  missed by

the three-stage modified Sierra 1, 3, 6 slot impactor arid Misco cellulose

media, as used in several studies.    The PTF values given here would

most likely be slight underestimates, as loading of the filter below a

critical stage should only slightly increase its collection efficiency.

     The value of PTF for Pb and Zn not only can be applied to those

elements, but also to other fine particle (n < 1.0 ym) associated elements.

Similarly, the PTF for Fe reported here could also apply to similarly

particle-size associated elements (D > 1.0 un).  Table 1 gives the overall

mean PTF for each of the three elements measured.  Table 2 shows some of

the stronger associations that could be found between the measured

parameters.  Although the correlation coefficients are very weak, expected

general  trends appear.   PTF and percent concentration fine aerosol (°tf)

seem to  be directly  related.  RH  is weakly and inversely related with PTF,

as would be expected due to the hygroscopic nature of the cellulosic

media.   Percent  fine aerosol association  is defined here as:
                           100%
      Separation of  the  five highest and lowest RH cases and computation

 of  PTF  values  for those  regimes,  shown in Table 1, again reflects the

-------
                                  101


inverse relationship,  but without strong statistical  significance.

(NOTE:   Fe was  undetectable in  most of these  ten  cases.)

     The main conclusion of this  study, then, is  that the  overall mean

RTF values in Table 1  are relevant correction factors for  the  size-

fractionate trace element in aerosol  data of  Sievering et_ al_.  (1980),

and Duce ejt al_.  (1976) and others.  Based on  %F as  a  convenient,  although

low-resolution,  size-association  indicator, the RTF results  for Pb,  Zn,

and Fe  can probably be reasonably extended to other elements in the

overlake detabase.  Applicability of these RTF values to  fine  aerosol

data collected  via cellulosic media by other  researchers  would require

a careful  evaluation of the exact sampling technique  employed, but will

hopefully be useful.



                              REFERENCES

     Duce, R.A., Ray,  B.J., Hoffman,  R.L., and Walsh, P.R. (1976).
          Trace  metal  concentration as a function of particle  size  in
          marine aerosols from Bermuda.  Geophys. Res. Lett, .3,
          339-342.

     Sievering,  H., Dave, f*., n0lske,  n., and McCoy,  P.  (1980).
          Trace  element concentrations over midlake Michigan as a
          function of Meteorology and  Source  Region,  Atmospheric
          Environment, 14, 39-53.

-------
                           102
Table 1.  Mean Pass-Through Factors (RTF) and Concentrations (f).

                    C, ng m
                              __        _____    __
                Pb      Zn      Fe        Pb       "   Zn   "" '     ce


Overall        109      61     165     37.6 ± 6.4   31.9 ± 6.1  11.9 ± 3.3


RH > 88        202      84      nd     36.1 ± 12.1  30.7 ± 10.3      nd

RH < 65         80      47      nd     42.8 ± 10.8  38.2 ± 12.6      nd
Table  2.  Some  Correlations  Between  Variables.

                         RTF  (Zn)      2F  (Pb)      *F  (Zn)      RH

RTF  (Pb)                   +.52         '-.25         +.44       -.24

RTF  (Zn)                               +.23         +.84       -.19

°/F  (Pb)                                            -.19       +.15

XF  (Zn)                                                      + .11
      F = Fine aerosol  (D < 1  vim)

-------
                    103
               APPENDIX D










CHEMICAL ELEMENTS IN ATMOSPHERIC AEROSOL



       OVER SOUTHERN LAKE MICHIGAN:



   THE CONTRIBUTION OF THE LAKE SOURCE
  Herman Sievering and Donald A. Dolske



      Envirormienta1  Science Program



       College of Applied Sciences



       Governors State University



      Park Forest South, IL   60466

-------
                                   104
                               ABSTRACT
     Chemical  element balance analysis was applied to atmospheric  aerosol
data obtained over Lake Michigan for 12 elements, in order to ascertain
the contribution of each of seven source types, especially Lake Michigan
itself.  It was found that the lake contributed about twice as much to
total aerosol  mass in both diameter d <1ym (fine) and d > lym (coarse)
aerosols as did soil, although the soil source aerosol contribution may
have been anomalously low.  The fine aerosol  lake source appears to be
dependent upon mean windspeed; the coarse aerosol lake source appears
to function most of the time.
     The samples were collected from May 1978 through January 1979, on
cellulose media with modified Sierra cascade impactors.  Summer and fall
sampling predominated.  Sampling was done at a City of Chicago water
intake crib, 3.2 km from shore on southern Lake Michigan, 87°32'W, 41°47'N.
Air concentrations were determined by inductively coupled Ar plasma
atomic emission spectroscopy.  Mean concentrations were generally 2 to
4 times higher than means observed one year earlier at midlake, 87 OO'W,
42°00'N, 50 km from the nearshore crib site.  Size distributions of the.
elements were similar at both sites, except for those of Ca and Mg which
appear to be due to the lake source.

-------
                                   105
                             INTRODUCTION
     The urban-industrial  complex surrounding the southwestern and
southern shore of Lake Michigan contributes significant amounts of
anthropogenic aerosol  to the atmosphere.   Prevailing winds in this
region give rise to particle trajectories that pass over the lake more
than 70 percent of the year (NOAA,  1975).  Mesoscale recirculation by
lake breeze events (Lyons  and Olsson,  1973),  unstable spring and autumnal
air overlake, and enhanced turbulence  during  non-steady-state conditions
(Hughes and Sievering, 1982) increase  the probability of atmospheric
pollutant aerosol contributing to the  chemical  loading of Lake Michigan.
The extent and intensity of the Chicago regional  air pollution source
(Winchester and Nifong, 1971; Gatz, 1975) is  such that moderately
efficient (^10 percent) transfer between  air  and  water would be detrimental
to water quality in the lake.  Trace metals (Eis^hreich, Emmling, and
Beeton, 1977; Dolske and Sievering, 1979) and nutrients (Murphy and Doskey,
1977; Dolske and Sievering, 1980) have been increasingly implicated as
significant atmospheric contributions  to  the  total  pollutant burden of
Lake Michigan.
     Processes affecting the overlake  transport and deposition of
pollutant aerosol are complex and not  well  understood.  In order to
expand the chemical and physical characterization of aerosols over
southern Lake Michigan, much research  has been conducted in recent years.
Sievering et al. (1979) collected aerosol and meteorological data in
1977 at a midlake site (87°00'W, 42°00'N).   Data, reported here, were
collected at the City of Chicago 68th  Street  water intake crib (87°32'W,

-------
                                  106




41°47'N) from May 1978 through January 1979.   Several  recent  aerosol



sampling programs (Williams and Muhlbaier,  1978;  Fingleton  and  Robbins,



1980} also collected data at the crib  site.   Comparison  of  these  crib



data with the 1977 midlake data is here undertaken  to  lend  insight



regarding the overlake transport and chemical  character  of  particulate



matter.  Further, chemical element balance  (Gordon, 1980; Cooper  and



Watson, 1980) analysis was undertaken  to quantify the  contribution  of



several aerosol source types to the particulate matter observed at  the



crib site.

-------
                                  107





                                METHODS



     In May and June 1978, flow-controlled high-volume samplers (General



Metal works, GMW 2000) were operated at the upper box-beam bridge which



runs between the two main buildings of the crib (see figure 1).  The



sampler intakes were 13 m above the lake surface, midway between the



two structures.  Standard meteorological sensors were also located at



the position.  A digital system recorded and printed 15-min means for



the continuously-monitored meteorological  parameters.  From July 1978



to January 1979, the hi-vol samplers were operated on the lower bridge



of the crib 6 m above the surface.  During these months, the meteorological



sensors were placed on a movable, 3-m mast which was erected on the upwind



side of the hexagonal sea wall for each day's sampling.



     In order to eliminate contamination from daily operation at the



crib, permissible wind direction (WD) sectors were defined.  Samples



were considered valid only if WD + la for the entire sampling period



was within the sectors 40° < WD < 130° or 210° < WD < 330° (see figure 1).



The samples were collected on cellulose impactor substrates (MISCO P252A)



and 20 x 25 cm backup filters (MISCO P810A).   Sierra #235 five-stage



impactors—modified to use only stages #1  and #3 along with the backup--



were exposed at 1.13 m  min   (40 SCFP1) for periods of 3 to 7 hours.  This



length of exposure was sufficient to collect enough aerosol for the



chemical analyses, yet short enough for meteorological parameters to



remain fairly constant during each sampling period.



     The exposed cellulose filters were analyzed by two separate methods.



The impactor strips and about one-half of the backup filter were oxygen-

-------
                                  108





plasma ashed at 75 watts RF.  The ash residue was dissolved in hot



6 N HNO~ and brought to a standard volume with distilled deionized



water.  This procedure gave three subsamples for each filter set:



two impactor stages (#1 and #3) collect coarse particles of diameter



(d) > 1.0 ym while the backup collects fine particles, d <1ym.  All



three subsamples were analyzed by inductively coupled Ar plasma atomic



emission spectroscopy (ICAP).  Elements identified were Al, Ca, Cd, Cu,



Fe, Mg, Mn, Mo, Na, Ni, Pb, Ti, Sn, V, and Zn.  Samples taken concurrently



and prepared by an alternate method (Dolske and Sievering,  1980) were



analyzed at USEPA-Central Regional Laboratory for total phosphorus,



nitrate, and sulfate by automated colorimetric methods.  A summary of



trace metal analytic detection limits, procedural blanks, and typical



sample values is given in Table I.  Note that Al values may be somewhat



low since HF dissolution was not used.  It should also be noted that ICAP



Cu data are considered valid not only because the procedural blank value



is small when compared with typical samples, but also because the hi-vol-^



motor exhaust was separated from the filter sampling.



     Duplicate analyses of  replicate samples and samples into which knewn



amounts of certain elements were spiked (Cu, Pb, Zn)  indicate that ICAP



results were reproducible to within + 20 percent.  A  second portion of



the backup filter from 12 filter sets was sent to Argonne National Laboratory



for x-ray fluorescence (XRF) analysis of Br, Fe, Mn,  Ni, Pb, Se, and Zn



content.  The results of this limited analytical intercomparison are given



in Table II.  For Pb, Zn, and Fe the concentrations were in fairly good



agreement, but the XRF results for Mn and Ni gave consistently higher



concentrations, resulting in large percent differences from ICAP concen-



trations.  The concentration values in the second column of Table  II  are

-------
                                  109






means of all  analytical results from both ICAP and XRF.  Br and Se were



not included  in the ICAP analyses.



     Meteorological data collected at the crib were complemented by



hourly reports from National Weather Service and U.S. Coast Guard stations



around southern Lake Michigan.  Also, during the May 1978 sampling period,



a National Center for Atmospheric Research aircraft collected meteorological



and aerosol number concentration data during flights that included the



crib site as  a sampling point (Hughes and Sievering, 1982).  From these



data, a simplified back-trajectory calculation determined the horizontal



and vertical  spread of the aerosol collected at the crib.  The horizontal



spread in the trajectory was assumed to lie within two standard deviations



about the mean wind direction.  The vertical spread was determined through



the application of stability category dispersion coefficients determined



as a function of the bulk Richardson number (Nagib, 1978).

-------
                                 no
                                RESULTS
     The back-trajectory data sets are divided into two distinct groups.
The first consists of data representing a direct Chicago-area-to-crib
traverse (figure 2a, for example).  The second group consists of data
representing aerosol trajectories strongly influenced by a lake breeze
recirculation (figure 2b).  The source area for all the data sets appears
to have been the general Chicago region (including Gary, Indiana),
regardless of the wind direction prevailing at the crib during aerosol
collection.  This was the result of restrictions placed on mean WD for
the entire set for valid, uncontaminated samples, and the small vertical
rise in trajectories upon reaching shore.
     Rahn (1976) has concluded that geometric means may be the most
appropriate representation of environmental concentrations of trace
elements for they tend to have lognormal distributions.  A direct comparison
of nearshore and midlake geometric mean concentrations of 16 elements and
compounds is shown in Table III.  The concentrations are geometric means
for all data sets collected where the wind direction was within permissible
sectors; each data set's concentration is the arithmetic sum of analytical
results for the impactor stages and the backup filter.  For aerosol
collected at the midlake site (87°00'W, 42°00'N), sampling, analytical,'
and trajectory-plotting methods used in 1977 (Sievering et al., 1979)
were the same as those used at the crib in 1978, so the two data sets
should be comparable.
     In general, mean concentrations at the crib site were two to four
times greater than the midlake means (Table III).  A few elements (Cd,
Mo, Ni, V) that were below ICAP detection limit at midlake appeared in

-------
                                 in
the nearshore samples.  This was not an unexpected result because of the
proximity of the crib site to the intense Chicago regional  aerosol source.
The mean concentrations at the midlake point were, in turn, five to more
than thirty times higher than the continental background concentrations
given by Rahn (1976).
     It is interesting to note, however, that while the concentration of
nearly all elements were much higher at the nearshore site, aerosol
elemental composition was essentially unchanged.   Enrichment factors for
each element of interest, x, were calculated using the average composition
of soils given by Bowen (1966):
          EF =
(aerosol)  /-\ $d1cator)   (soil)
                 C (indicator)
Al was used as the soil-derived or natural-background aerosol  indicator
element, with EF = 1.   Values of EF > 1  indicate that an element is present
in amounts greater than might be expected from the natural, soil-derived
source.  From Table IV, it can be seen that the most highly enriched
elements are Cd, Pb,  Zn,  Mo, Ni, and Cu.
     The impactor arrangement used allows the first impactor stage to be
taken as collecting only coarse (d > 1 ym) particles.  The second impactor
stage improves resolution between the coarse mode (1st stage)  and fine
mode (backup).  The distribution of an element with respect to particle
size can be crudely shown by a ratio between the fine and coarse particle
concentrations of that element:

          Fine/Coarse Fraction -

-------
                                 112





     In Table IV, the fine/coarse fractions for the crib samples and



midlake samples are compared.  For  most elements there are no significant



differences between the two data sets.  A fraction greater than one



indicates that the element is concentrated in the d < 1 ym or fine particle



range.  Note that this is the case for all of the high-EF, anthropogenic



elements.



     Another descriptor of the elemental content of the aerosol is percent



mass composition:





                               C (x)
          % mass composition = —L-L	
                               C (total aerosol)



where C (total aerosol) has been gravimetrically determined from standard



type-A glass fiber filters (20 x 25 cm).  The values calculated here



(Table IV) conform closely to the data of Gatz  (1975) for Chicago aerosol



and to the midlake values that had trajectories indicating the presence



of the Chicago source aerosol.

-------
                                113
                              DISCUSSION
     Comparing the 1978 crib-site  concentrations  with  the  1977  midlake-
site concentrations leads  to two observations  regarding  qualitative
effects of overlake transport on the  Chicago region  source aerosol.
(Caution is expressed regarding quantitative comparison  of the  two
data sets since a number of factors may contribute to  their differences.)
First, the fine/coarse fractions and  % mass compositions (Table IV)
reveal three groups of elements.   For Pb,  Zn,  and S  the  fine/coarse
fractions are slightly greater at  midlake  than at the  crib while their
% mass compositions are less. (Of  the elements identified  by ICAP,  these
are more strongly associated with  fine particles.) Sedimentation loss  of
coarse particles, gas-to-particle  reactions, and  coagulative growth
could all contribute to this outcome.      For Al, Cu, Fe, and  Mn (and
possibly N and P) the fine/coarse  fraction was slightly larger  nearshore.
In contrast to these two groups,  Ca  and Mg show large, significant
differences between fine/coarse fractions  at midlake and nearshore (a
factor of three or more).   The decrease in Ca  and Mg fine/coarse fractions
during overlake transport might be due to  the  generation of aerosol  by
the lake itself.
     A second qualitative observation concerns the effect of lake-breeze-
induced mesoscale recirculation on the nature  of crib-site aerosol.   Of
the 23 crib filter sets, 18 could  be separated into  two groups; those
with which no lake breeze event was  associated, and  those for which a
well-developed mesoscale recirculation was indicated by surface and aircraft
data.  For the lake breeze case data, overall  concentrations at the crib
site were slightly lower than at midlake.   This point is consistent with
large-particle sedimentation loss and dilution, as well as aerosol aging
within the recirculating plume (Lyons and Olsson, 1973).  EFs for the two

-------
                                 114

groupings of 8 lake-breeze and 10 no-lake-breeze  filter  sets  show  no
substantial differences except for Ca and Mg.   For these two  elements,
EFs are two and one-half times larger for the  no-lake-breeze  group than
for the lake-breeze group.  This appears, at first, peculiar  since
aerosol in a lake-breeze trajectory are present over the lake far  longer
than are those aerosol  in a nearly direct trajectory from shore  to the
crib site.  However, the mean windspeed at the crib was  3.4 + 1.5  ms   for
the 8 lake-breeze filter sets and 6.0 + 1.0 ms    for the 10  no-lake-
breeze filter sets.  The combination of light  winds (< 5 ms   ) and
thermally stable air present over the lake during lake-breeze events
could "shut off" the lake aerosol source whereas  winds greater than
5 ms"^  might introduce a lake source component to the total  aerosol
observed at the crib site.

-------
                                115
Chemical Element Balance (CEB)
     Since both qualitative observations above suggest a  lake  source
contribution to aerosol  chemical  character over Lake  Michigan,  a  source
reconciliation was attempted using the chemical  element balance (CEB)
approach (Gordon, 1980;  Cooper and Watson, 1980).   The computer analysis
developed by Watson (1979)  was used, affording both fine  and coarse  fraction
aerosol source reconciliation.  This particular computer  analysis  is
especially useful when considering the crib site data since  the uncertainty
in each calculated source contribution is also determined.   The reason
this latter point is useful is that the identification of a  lake  aerosol
source may be confused by the cement limestone manufacturing  (or,  less
likely, a soil-like anthropogenic) aerosol source;  or highway  or  road
dust which are all similar  to the lake source  and  also prevalent  in
the Chicago region (Gatz, 1975; Winchester and Nifong, 1971).   This
problem may be ameliorated  somewhat by adding  Na filter sets'  data
since Lake Michigan dissolved and suspended solids  are about 2%
Na by weight (Torrey,  1976) whereas the cement manufacturing source
aerosols are known to  be less than 0.001% Na by weight (Kowalcyzk
and Gordon, 1979).  Because of high blank levels,  Na  concentrations
could not be determined  for 5 of 23 filter sets'  data aggregated  to  give
Tables III and IV results.   The remaining 18 may,  however,  be  considered
in discriminating between the lake and cement  manufacturing  sources.
Seventeen of these 18  sets  were obtained before December  so  that  the
road-salting Na source may  be discounted.  Of  course, Na  in  soil,  fuel
oil, and coal  must also  be  considered.  Then there  is the ubiquitous
sea salt source.  The  purpose of the CEB approach  is  to account for
these multiple source  contributions for each of the elements monitored.

-------
                                 116





     Seven source types were here considered: the lake source (hereafter,



LAKE); a soil source (SOIL); a cement manufacturing source (CEMENT); an



iron and steel manufacturing source (STEEL); a coal burning source



(COAL); a fuel oil burning source (OIL); and an automobile source




(AUTO).  Table V lists the elemental  composition--including uncertainties--



for each of these seven source types.   Notice that Ti  was included.



(For all 18 filter sets being considered, Ti concentrations were



significantly above their procedural  blank values.)  Since Ti may help



in distinguishing between SOIL and COAL it was included in the CEB



analysis.  Ni, Mo, and Sn were not included since there were too many



instances for which their fine or coarse mode concentrations were not



sufficiently above procedural blanks.   (These three elements contribute



< 0.01% [or an unknown amount] to all  seven of the aerosol  sources in



Table V.)




     The seven source types were chosen on the basis that they probably



contribute the large majority of mass  for the 12 elements in Table V.



except Na and possibly Zn (Gatz, 1975).  The elemental composition of



each source (its "fingerprint") was determined by combining Chicago-



region data with published statements  of relative mass contribution--



primarily those of Gatz, 1975; Kowalcyzk and Gordon, 1979; Ondov et al, ,



1979.



     Detailed information on dolomite  limestone used to make cement



(Lamar and Thomas, 1956) shows that Chicago-region limestone quarries



contain, on average, only about two and  one-half times more Ca than Mg,



whereas, finished cement contains 35  to 40 times more  Ca than Mg.  The



emission source for cement manufacturing is almost entirely caused by



mining in the quarries; thus, the use  of Lamar and Thomas'  quarry analyses



instead of finished cement analyses to specify the CEMENT elemental

-------
                                 117




source composition.   Notice the large  uncertainty  in  weight  percent  for



both CEMENT Ca and Mg.   This is due  to  the  wide  variation  in their



content from quarry  to  quarry.   LAKE was  determined  using  Torrey's



(1976) review of Lake Michigan  chemical  data.   Total  dissolved solid



and total  suspended  particulate contributions  were summed  to arrive  at



each element's LAKE  contribution.   LAKE assumes  no enrichment of elements



during aerosol emission at air/water interface.



    A comparison of LAKE and CEMENT  shows that the ratio  of  Ca to Mg as



well as the weight percent for  Fe  and  Na  may afford  the separation  of



LAKE contributions from those of CEMENT.   No previous literature source



composition for LAKE is available  for  this  comparison, but most literature



cement manufacturing compositions  (Gatz,  1975; Winchester and Nifong, 1971)



assumed emissions "to have the  same  composition as the finished product"



and, thus, an inappropriate low weight percent of Mg.  There is also about



65;J and about 75" more Fe and Al ,  respectively, in CEMENT than was  indicated



by Gatz (1975).  The Mn content is about the same as was  assumed by



Kowalczk. and  Gordon  (1979) although, as in  the case of Mg, the Mn content



in quarries is quite variable or unknown.  CEMENT, as specified in



Table V, actually causes more difficulty in distinguishing it from LAKE



than if literature cement source compositions had been used.



    Distinguishing SOIL from COAL has  also  been shown to  be  quite



difficult.  In fact, Cooper and Watson (1980) point out that soil,



road dust, rock crusher, asphalt production and coal source  contributions



"cannot readily be distinguished on the basis of their elemental finger-



prints and are usually grouped  into a  common source category."  This is



especially true in the present  context since the elemental concentrations



of Br, K and  S were  not determined.   In setting out to distinguish SOIL

-------
                                 118



and COAL it was felt that COAL would be a major contributor to the fine



fraction aerosol but not to the coarse fraction (Ondov  et al.,  1979)



whereas road dust, rock crusher and asphalt production sources would



fractionate about the same as SOIL by aerosol  size.  SOIL may therefore



be seen as representing some anthropogenic soil-like aerosol  sources



as well as the natural soil source itself.



     The midwestern soil composition of Bowen  (1966) provided the elemental



fingerprint for SOIL in Table V.  This is essentially the same soil



"fingerprint" used by Gatz (1975) in previous  Chicago-region  CEB



interpretive analysis.  The coal source composition was specified using



Ondov et al. (1979) as the primary data source.  Commonwealth Edison



(1981) was contacted to confirm that cold-side electrostatic  precipitators



are used (almost exclusively) as pollution control  devices on their coal-



fired power plants and that western coal  is by far the primary coal  type



burned.  Thus, the data of Ondov et al. (1979) is especially  appropriate.



However, it was feund (Commonwealth Edison, 1981) that the concentration



of Cd and Zn are approximately 30 times and 3  times higher, respectively,



and V approximately 3 times lower in the  strains of locally burned



coal  than in that considered by Ondov et  al.  (1979).  COAL in Table V



directly reflects this in its distinction from the Ondov et al.  (1979j<



coal  "fingerprint."  A comparison of COAL (Table V) with a previously



identified Chicago-region coal  source (Gatz,  1975) shows some differences.



The ratio of Gatz's values to COAL are (in parens): Al (1.0), Ca (1.3),



Cd (2.5), Fe (2.1), Mg (0.7), Mn (0.6), Pb (12), V (2.7), Zn  (2.2),



Na (0.2) and Ti (1.1).  These differences are  primarily the result of



a more careful  consideration in COAL of the coal type and pollution



control devices used by coal-fired power  plants in the Chicago-region.

-------
                                  119





Notice again, though, the large uncertainties specified,especially for



Cd, Pb and V, due to il1-knowledge of certain elemental  weight



contri butions.



     STEEL in Table V has nearly the same source composition as was



earlier specified by Gatz (1975) and Winchester and Nifong (1971)



except that recent emission measurements from a number of steel



manufacturing plants (Lake-Porter Air Pollution Task Force, 1981)



showed one-third lower concentrations of Ca, and very slightly lower Cu,



Fe and Mg concentrations.



     OIL in Table V is almost identical  to the oil  source composition



of Kowalcyzk and Gordon (1979) since actual  oil-burning emissions



were analyzed for Al, Ca, Cu, Fe, Pb and Zn  as well as  V and Na.



Finally, AUTO is also nearly the same as the auto source composition



of Kowalcyzk and Gordon (1979) except that the weight percent of Pb



was reduced from 40% to 25% given the changing mix  of leaded/unleaded



automobile fuel  use (Illinois Chamber of Commerce,  1981).



     The Table V source types and the 18 crib filter sets for which



all 12 elemental mass concentrations are available  were used to perform



CEB analysis on  a set-by-set basis  for both  the fine fraction and



coarse fraction  elemental  masses.   It was first confirmed that each



element's mass concentration could  be fully  explained by a six-source



linear combination (excluding either CEMENT  or LAKE), except Na and Zn



concentrations.   The Table VI results show the mean ratio of CEB



calculated to observed concentrations for Ca, Fe, Mg, Mn, as well  as



for Na and Zn.   The mean percent Na  explained (across the 18 sets



considered) is  40% for the fine fraction mass and 88% in the coarse



fraction mass when LAKE is considered in linear combination with  the



last five sources of Table V.  Invoking  a sea salt  mass concentration,

-------
                                  120

                                 _ 3
in no case greater than 0.25 yg m  , completely explains the residual


Na mass with the concomitant introduction, by the sea source, of no


more than a 3% enhancement of Ca and Mg.  The explained Zn may be low


due to neglect of an incineration source because it could not be well


specified.  There is also some possibility that one of the anthropogenic


soil-like aerosol sources (such as road dust) which is enriched in Zn


may explain some of the residual Zn.  However, it will be seen below


that SOIL, representing these anthropogenic soil-like aerosol sources (partly)


as well as the natural soil source, was a relatively small contributor


to the total aerosol mass.  The otherwise exceptional fit of the six-


source linear combination (using either LAKE or CEMENT) to the elemental


mass data base for both fine and coarse fractions warrants the presentation


of the overall CEB results.


CEB Source Reconciliation


    The mean ratio of calculated CEB to  actual  observed  elemental  concen-


trations was very nearly 1.0 when  taking a six-source combination,  using


either LAKE or CEMENT separately,  as Table VI  shows.   However,  uncer-


tainty in these Table VI ratios were substantially greater when CEMENT


was used as opposed to LAKE.  In the case of Mn, an  overall  uncertainty


of 20% results from use of LAKE versus 37% from use of CEMENT;  for  Fe_ ^


these uncertainties are 14% and 29%, respectively.  Uncertainty for Mg


was 18% and 110% respectively for LAKE and CEMENT.  Clearly, LAKE better


explains the set-by-set crib-site data than does CEMENT, when one or the


other is used in combination with the remaining five sources of Table V.


    We are also interested in the relative contributions of the seven


sources to the overall elemental concentrations at the crib site.  A


linear combination of all  seven sources was used to obtain the CEB results


in Table VII for both FINE  (fine fraction) and COARSE (coarse fraction)

-------
                                   121






mass loadings--relati ve to a soil source of unit (1.0) na^nitude.




Since too few filter sets had an associated total  aerosol  mass, the results



must be presented as relative magnitudes; that is, CEB analysis was



performed instead of chemical mass balance (CMB) analysis.  The range



in relative source contributions is quite large (except for COAL).



Therefore, only approximate mean ratios are stated in Table VII, again



excepting COAL.  The Table V source contributions of COAL and SOIL  are



quite similar, so the mean ratio of FINE COAL to SOIL is a rather constant



0.55 + 0.06.      As an example of confidence in Table V source contri-



butions the mean uncertainties for FINE SOIL and FINE COAL are 32%  and



34%, respectively.  These small uncertainties justify strong confidence



in the value 0.55, considering that uncertainty in the ICAP elemental



analyses is 20% to 30% and that source elemental compositions (Table V)



are even more uncertain.



    Of greatest interest is the relative contribution of LAKE.  As  shown



in Table VII, LAKE has a mean ratio of ~2, relative to CEMENT as well as



to SOIL.  This suggests that CEMENT and SOIL together just equal, on a



total aerosol mass basis, LAKE.  It is, however, important to note  that



the percent mass composition of Al , and even of Fe, is lower at the crib



site than it was the previous year at midlake.   The 0.4% mass for Al



during the 1978 crib sampling is, in fact, one-fifth that in an elemental



composition model  for Chicago aerosol  suggested by Gatz (1975).  Thus, the



SOIL contribution was anomalously low during crib sampling.   The range



in the ratio of LAKE to SOIL observed across the 18 filter sets is  very



wide, being anywhere from 0.5 to 4.8 for FINE and 0.3 to 4.6 for COARSE.



Most of this variability is probably due to that in LAKE contribution



to crib site aerosol  mass and must be considered real  since the total



mean percent uncertainty for FINE LAKE  is 55% and for COARSE LAKE 61%.

-------
                                   122




(These total  uncertainties  are  the sum  of the  SOIL  uncertainty and LAKE



uncertainty since we are here considering a  ratio of  the  two.  The



total  mean percent uncertainty  for CEMENT is  99%  for  FINE and 101%



for COARSE.)   The equally strong contribution  of  LAKE to  fine and coarse



aerosols over Lake Michigan (double that of- SOIL) is  surprising, espe-



cially considering the qualitative observation early  in this discussion



that fine/coarse fractions  for  the largely lake-derived Ca and Mg were



reduced at the midlake site compared with the  crib  site.   However, the



fact that LAKE appears to be such a variable  source suggests that the



lake may be a strong local  aerosol source.  This  latter point is in



concert with the second qualitative observation that  filter sets for



no-lake-breeze conditions had significantly larger  Ca and Mg EF's than



the lake-breeze group of filter sets.  The short  overlake fetch of 3  to



at most 10 km for the no-lake-breeze sets was  apparently  still sufficient



to allow the lake to contribute Ca and  Mg to  the  aerosol  observed at  the



crib site so long as at least moderate  windspeeds prevailed.



    Separation into 8 lake-breeze and 10 no-lake-breeze  filter sets  results



in the LAKE/SOIL ratios shown in Table  VIII.   The FINE LAKE mass contribu-



tion during lake-breeze occurrences is  significantly below the overall



ratio of two, whereas the ratio for FINE LAKE with  no-lake-breeze  (and.



short over-water fetch) is higher than  this for most of the 10 sets  in



this group.  There is no distinguishable difference for COARSE  LAKE.   The



fact that windspeeds  were 3.4 +  1.5 m s~  during lake-breeze  sets  and



6.0 + 1.0 m s"1 during the short-fetch  no-lake-breeze sets indicates  that



a local lake source can definitely contribute to crib site aerosol  mass;



Table VIII indicates a greater lake contribution in the fine fraction.  The



Table VIII data suggest that lake-derived fine  (d < 1  ym)  aerosol  may be  much



more dependent upon mean windspeed, and  that lake-derived coarse  (d  > 1  ym)




aerosol may be omnipresent.

-------
                                    123

                              CONCLUSION
     CEB analysis was successfully applied to the 68th Street crib
site data base.   Quantitative identification of a strong lake source
(possibly local) aerosol  supports qualitative indicators, based on Ca
and Mg enrichment factors and fine/coarse aerosol fractions,  that a
lake source is significantly contributing to aerosol  mass over Lake
Michigan.  This  is true not only for coarse (diameter, d > 1  pm) aerosol
but also for fine (d < 1  ym) aerosol.        The lake  source contribution
to the fine aerosol  mass  is about equal  to the sum of anthropogenic
contributions (iron/steel manufacturing, oil burning  and automobile
exhaust).  The strength of the fine aerosol lake source appears to be
dependent upon mean  windspeed whereas the coarse aerosol lake source
appears to be much less so.  The coarse aerosol lake  source is very
probably due to  the  jet drop generated during wave breaking whereas we
may speculate that film drops are responsible for the fine aerosol lake
source.
     The lake source was  found to contribute twice as much mass as did
soil.  This was  so for both the fine and coarse fractions.  However,
the soil source  appeared to contribute one-half to one-fifth less mass
during the 1978  crib site field sampling effort than  may be considered
typical.  If a four-times larger soil source contribution had been present,
the lake source would have been found to contribute about half as much
as the more typical  soil  source.  Nonetheless, the lake as a source of
aerosol mass must be carefully considered whenever aerosol data obtained
over Lake Michigan,  or any other of the Great Lakes,  are being interpreted.

-------
                                    124





                             ACKNOWLEDGMENT



     The authors wish to thank J.  Forst,  K. Walther,  and W.  Ward



for tireless help with the field program;  V.  Jensen for his  analytical



assistance; Dixie Butz and Vera Rhimes for preparing  the manuscript.



We also wish to extend our appreciation  to Tom Tisue  of Argonne



National Lab for the XRF analysis  of our filter portions, and J. Schmidt



for review of our manuscript draft.   This  work was supported by USEPA,



Grant #R005301012.

-------
                                     125
                               REFERENCES

Bowen, H.J.M., 1966.  Trace Elements in Biochemistry, Academic Press,
     New York.

Commonwealth Edison, 1981.  Private communication.

Cooper. A.  and Watson, J.G., 1980.  Receptor oriented methods of particle
     source apportionment.  J. Air Poll.  Cont.  Assoc., 30, 1116-1122.

Dolske, D.A. and Sievering, H., 1979.   Trace element loading of Southern
     Lake Michigan by dry deposition of atmospheric aerosol.  Water,  Air,
     Soil and Poll., 12, 485-502.

Dolske, D.A. and Sievering, H., 1980.   Nutrient loading of Southern Lake
     Michigan by dry deposition of atmospheric  aerosol.  J.  Great Lakes  Res.,
     6, 184-194.

Eisenreich, S.J., Emmling, P.J. and Beeton,  A.M.,  1977.  Atmospheric
     loading of phosphorus and other chemicals  to  Lake Michigan.   CL_
     Great Lakes Res.,  3, 291-304.

Fingleton, D.J. and Robbins, J.A.,  1980.   Trace elements in  air over  Lake
     Michigan near Chicago during  September, 1973.  J.  Great Lakes Res., 6,
     22-37.

Gatz, D.F., 1975.  Relative contributions of different souces of urban
     aerosols: application of a new estimation  method to multiple sites
     in Chicago.  Atmos. Env., 9,  1-18.

Gordon, G.E., 1980.  Receptor models.   Env.  Sci. & Tech., 14, 792-799.

Hughes, R.L. and Sievering, H., 1982.   Lake  breezes on particle size
     spectra and sulfate over Lake  Michigan, submitted to Jour,  of Appl.
     Meteor.

Illinois Chamber of Commerce,  1981.   Private communication.

Lamar,  J.E. and Thomson, K.B., 1956.   A description of dolomite limestone
     by chemical  analysis in the County of Cook, 111.   Geo.  Survey Circ.
     #221.

Kowalcyzk,  G.S.  and Gordon, G.E.,  1979.   Source identification of trace
     elements and total  suspended  particulate material  in Washington, DC,
     presented at the San Francisco A.I.Ch.E. meeting,  Nov., 1979 (unpublished),

Lake-Porter Air Pollution Task Force,  1981.   Private communication.

Lyons,  W.A. and Olsson,  L.E.,  1973.   Detailed mesometeorological  studies
     of air pollution dispersion in the Chicago Lake breeze.  Month.
     Weather Rev.,  101,  387-403.

-------
                                     126


Mezaros, A., 1977.  On the size distribution of atmospheric  aerosol
     particles of different composition.   Atmos.  Env.,  11_,  1075-1081.

Murphy, T.J. and Doskey, P.V., 1977.   Inputs of phosphorus  from
     precipitation to Lake Michigan.   J.  Great Lakes Res.,  3,   305-312.

Nagib, H., 1978.  Private communication.

NOAA, 1975.  Summary of Synoptic Meteorological Observations for Great
     Lakes area., vol. 3, Lake Michigan.   Nat'l Climatic Center,
     Asheville, N.C.

Ondov, J.M., Ragaini, R.C. and Biermann,  A.M., 1979.  Elemental emission
     from a coal-fired power plant:   Comparison of a venturi wet scrubber
     system with a cold-side electrostatic precipitator.  Env.  Sci.  &
     Tech., 13. 362-371.

Rahn, K., 1976.  The Chemical Composition of Atmospheric Aerosol.   Grad.
     School or Oceanogr., U. Rhode Island, Kingston, R.I..,  265  pp.

Sievering, H., Dave, M., Dolske, D.A., Hughes, R.L., and McCoy, P.,  1979.
     An Experimental Study of Lake Loading by Aerosol  Transport and
     Deposition in the Southern Lake Michigan Basin. EPA-905/4-79-016.

Torrey, M.S., 1976.  Environmental Status of the Lake Michigan  Region,
     vol  3, Chemistry of Lake Michigan.   ANL/ES-040, Argonne National
     Lab, Argonne, 111.

Watson, J.G., 1979.  Chemical elemental balance receptor model  methodology
     for assessing the sources of fine and total  suspended  particulate
     matter in Portland, Oregon.  Ph.D. Dissertation, Oregon Graduate
     Center, Beaverton, Oregon.

Williams, R.M. and Muhlbaier, J., 1978.  Preliminary findings of wind-
     direction controlled aerosol sampling over Lake Michigan.   In  Argenne
     National Lab, RER Division Annual Report:  Ecology, Jan-Dec 1978.
     ANL-78-65-I11.

Winchester, J.W. and Nifong, G.D., 1971.   Water pollution in Lake Michigan
     from pollution aerosol fallout.   Water, Air and Soil  Poll., 1,  50-64.

-------
                               TABLE I
Element
Al
Ca
Cd
Cu
Fe
Mg
Mn
Mo
Ni
Pb
Sn
V
Zn
Detection
1 inri t
90
5000
2
9
120
100
6
6
5
45
8
2
50
Procedural
blank
290
5100
6
40
240
210
20
30
40
80
10
4
100
Typical
sample
2600
16400
120
230
6300
4900
500
75
75
4100
260
90
1800
Detection limits,  procedural  blanks,  and typical  sample concentrations
     for the ICAP  method (yg  £-1)

-------
                                   128






                            TABLE  II
Element
Fe
Mn
Ni
Pb
Zn
Mean Concentration
of ICAP and XRF
(ng m~3)
785
32
27
500
490
Mean Difference
ICAP vs. XRF
(%)
33
66
70
19
18





Results of ICAP and  XRF  analyses of  12 filter sets

-------


Element
A]
Ca
Cd
Cu
Fe
Mg
Mn
Mo
Ni
Pb
Sn
V
Zn
P
N (N03)
s (so4)
Mass
129
TABLE III
C nearshore,
1978
(ng m~^)
215
1340
10
20
520
405
40
6
6
340
20
7
150
20
3670
5660
57,600


C midlake,
1977
(ng m~3)
180
770
n.d.
6
320
200
20
n.d.
n.d.
140
10
n.d.
55
35
3100
5100
31,800
Geometric mean concentrations  of elements  in  aerosol  at  the  68th  Street
     crib and midlake.

-------


Element
Al
Ca
Cd
Cu
Fe
Mg
Mn
Mo
Ni
Pb
Sn
V
Zn
P
N (NO,)
O
s (so4)



EF
1.0
22
4300
190
4.6
26
11
580
230
5200
690
100
580


130
TABLE IV
Nearshore
Fine/Coarse % Mass
Fraction Composition
1.7 0.4
1.2 2.3
15.6 <0.1
5.5 <0.1
3.3 0.9
2.2 0.7
3.1 <0.1
5.8 <0.1
7.2 <0.1
12.7 0.6
4.7 <0.1
7.4 <0.1
4.4 0.3
7.6 <0.1
9.1 6.5
30.8, 9.8


Midlake
Fine/Coarse
EF Fraction
1.0 1.2
22 0.4

170 2.9
3.5 1.6
23 0.6
10 2.0


5200 17.3


530 6.1
4.2
8.0
37.3



% Mass
Composition
0.6
2.4

<0.1
1.0
0.6
<0.1


0.4


0.2
0.1
3.1
5.6
Comparison of parameterized characterizations of nearshore and midlake  aerosols.

-------
                                       131






                                     TABLE V



                                Percent by Weight
Element
Al
Ca
Cd
Cu
Fe
Mg
Mn
Pb
V
Zn
Na
Ti
LAKE
0.03+0.02
22+5
<0.01
0.02+0.02
0.03+0.03
7.5+1.5
0.01+0.01
<0.01
<0.01
0.02+0.02
2.1+0.4
<0.01
CEMENT
3.2±2.6
32+12
<0.01
<0.01
3.2+2.3
12+11
0.1+0.1
<0.01
<0.01
0.03+0.02
<0.01
<0.01
SOIL
6.5±1.5
1.2+.0.3
<0.01
<0.01
3.7+0.4
0.5+0.2
0.08+0.04
<0.01
0.01+0.01
<0.01
0.6+0.3
0.4+0.1
COAL
14±3
3.1+1.1
0. 01+.0. 01
<0.01
3.4+0.6
1.1+0.4
0.04+0.02
0.01+0.01
0.03+0.02
0.04+0.01
1.8+0.5
0.8+0.2
STEEL
2.3+0.7
3.6+2.0
<0.01
1.4+0.6
36+6
1.4+0.6
2.5+0.5
<0.01
<0.01
1.8+0.6
<0.01
<0.01
OIL
0.210.1
2.9+0.3
<0.01
0.09+0.06
0.9+0.7
0.15+0.05
0.02+0.01
<0.01
3.0+1.0
0.2+0.1
1.6+0.8
<0.01
	 1
AUTO
0.15+0.09
0.05+0.03
<0.01
<0.01
1.8+1.2
<0.01
<0.01
25+5
<0.01
0.07+0.05
<0.01
<0.01
Aerosol  composition for various Chicago-region source types.

-------
                                  132
                                 TABLE  VI


                    Mean  Ratio  (Calculated  to  Observed)

                       Using  LAKE	    |     |          Using  CEMENT
Element
Ca
Fe
Mg
Mn
Na
Zn
Fine Fraction
1 .24
1 .0
Q.85
0.93
0.40
0.24
Coarse Fraction
0.86
1 .01
0.78
0.95
0.88
0.37
Fine Fraction
O.P8
1 .04
0.68
0.98
0.26
0.25
Coarse Fraction
0.87
1 .04
0.82
0.94
0.39
0.38
Ratio of CEB calculated (six-source linear combination)  to observed  elemental
    concentrations.

-------
                                     133
                                   TABLE VII
                             Relative Weight (SOIL = 1.0)
Aerosol
Fraction LAKE CEMENT
FINE
(d < 1 pm)
Mean Ratio ^2 M
Range 0.5-4.8 0.2-2.8
COARSE
(d > 1 ym)
Mean Ratio ^2 >1
Range 0.3-4.6 0.2-3.3
STEEL OIL AUTO COAL
3/4 1/4 ^1 0.55
0.3-1.5 0.1-0.5 0.2-2.5 0.4-0.7
1/3 0 1/10 0
0.1-0.6 0-0.2
Relative weighting  of six source types  for fine  and  coarse  aerosol  fractions
     at the 68th Street crib site.

-------
                                  134
                                TABLE VIII
                                    Relative weight (SOIL =  1 .0;
Aerosol
Fraction
FINE
(d < 1 ym)
COARSE
(d > 1 ym)
Mean windspeed 3
X. and fetch LAKE
\. (long


.4 ± 1.5 ms'1
with lake breeze
over-water fetch)
1.0 + 0.5
2.4 + 1.0
6.0 i 1.0 ms-"1
LAKE with no lake breeze
(short over-water fetch)
3.7 + 2.2
2.2 + 2.1
Relative weighting of the lake source for fine and coarse aerosol  fractions
and as a function of fetch over the lake.

-------
Fi
gure 1.   Plan of City of Chicago 68th Street crib,
         showing permissible wind direction sector
         limits
                                                      CO
                                                      en

-------
        LAKE MICHIGAN
      68th Street Crib
Figure 2.  Plot of back-trajectory calculation for two sample periods.
        a) Direct shore-to-crib trajectory.

-------
                            137
                LAKE MICHIGAN
              68th Street Crib
   Chicago
o
o
I

oo
00
Kilometers
                     10  20 25
O
O
o

N-
co
                                                         41°30'
o
CO
o
CD
co
                                                     052678 1600Z
            Figure 2   b) Trajectory influenced by lake breeze event.

-------
                 138
              APPENDIX E
     SOME EFFECTS OF WIND-SHIFT ON



         OVER-LAKE TURBULENCE



        AND AEROSOL DEPOSITION
Richard L.  Hughes and Herman Sieverlng



     Environmental  Science Program



      College of Applied Sciences



       Governors State University



      Park  Forest South, IL   60466

-------
                                    139
Abstract

      Aircraft measurements of turbulence spectra and surface measurements
of total aerosol mass derived from size distributions were compared for
periods with and without windshift over the southern basin of Lake Michigan
in September of 1977 and May of 1978.  It was found that wind shifts are
associated with depletion of near-surface aerosol mass and with departures
from isotropy in the inertia! subrange as indicated by difference of the
ratio of vertical velocity spectra to longitudinal velocity spectra from the
isotropic value of 4/3.  Velocity spectra were measured by fixed and rotating
vanes mounted on the aircraft nose boom.   Aerosol size distributions were
measured by a laser scattering particle counter.

-------
                                     140
 I.   Introduction
       Dry  deposition of atmospheric aerosols to water bodies has, within the
 last decade,  come to be recognized as an  important and, for some substances,
 predominant route for the  influx of matter.  Winchester and Nifong  (1971)
 calculated atmospheric loading rates for  the region of the southern basin of
 Lake Michigan.  This model has been variously modified by Skibin (1973),
 Sievering  (1976) and others.  These studies and those by Gatz (1975a and
 1975b) not only found increased estimated loadings to the lake by the
 atmospheric route, but pointed out large  uncertainties in these estimates,
 stemming from a lack of understanding of  the boundary layer dynamics of
 aerosols and  lack of in situ measurements of dry deposition over the lake.
      The most direct method of measuring aerosol flux, the eddy correlation
 method, has proved to be unwieldy in the  field and especially on a lake
 surface (Williams  et al., 1980 ).  There  has been enough evidence, however,
 to note a large discrepancy between measurements done in a wind tunnel
 (Sehmel and Sutter, 1974) and those taker under field conditions.  Construction
 of a model capable of accurately predicting deposition of aerosols to a
 water surface requires consideration of all phenomena contributing to this
 discrepancy.   Several explanations have been proposed in the literature
 (see review article by SI inn  et al., 1978).  One possible phenomenon discussed
 by Slinn (1979) is the rapid uptake of water vapor by aerosols  in the high
 humidity environment near the surface and subsequent gravitational  fallout.
      Another mechanism suggested by  Sievering (1980)  involves  direct
 impaction of  particles on those  elements of the surface which protrude  through
 the laminar sub-layer.   When a continuous laminar sub-layer is  present, one
may expect more than an order of magnitude variation in aerosol  deposition for

-------
                                    141                                2
the 0.1 < d < 2 pm size range.   It was found experimentally (Sievering, 1980)
that a two-to three-fold variation prevailed in this size range under conditions
of moderate wind speed (2.4 to 8.2 m sec"1).  If these experimental  data are
truly representative of air/water aerosol exchange for moderate wind-speed
regimes, then non-steady state conditions must predominate above the interface.
That is, turbulence-induced eddies may advect aerosols to surface roughness
elements protruding outside a  possibly discontinuous  sublayer resulting in
direct impaction.
      One of the ways in which deposition to a water surface differs from
deposition to land or vegetation is that a water body adapts its surface
characteristics to the wind.  There is, particularly over large bodies of
water, a lag between a change in the wind regime and the adaptation of the
wave train (SethuRaman, 1978).   During this period of maladjustment, elements
of the water surface are most prone to protrusion .through the laminar sub-
layer.  A change in wind speed or direction perturbs  the equilibrium
between a water surface and a steady-state wind, and would be expected to
also perturb the state of isotropy which is presumed to occur within the
inertia! subrange of the momentum power spectrum in the absence of unusual
sources or sinks of kinetic energy.   One necessary,  but not sufficient,
indicator of the presence of an isotropic state is the ratio of the vertical
velocity (or lateral velocity)  spectrum to the longitudinal velocity spectrum.
In the inertial subrange, this  ratio is thought to approach the value 4/3 under
isotropic conditions.  Departures from this value in over-water environments
relative to over-land environments have been previously noted using a variety
of measurement techniques (Schmitt,  Friehe and Gibson, 1978),

-------
                                    142
                                                                       3.
2.  Instrumentation
      Turbulence measurements were taken aboard a Beechcraft £"?eenaire
aircraft provided by the Research Aviation Facility of the National Center
for Atmospheric Research.  The aircraft departed from Midway airport and upon
reaching the lake proceeded at a low altitude (usually 30 m) to the midlake
sampling site 87°00'W, 42°00'N  (see  fig.  I).  Vertical soundings were taken
in a square spiral "box" pattern over this site, over a point halfway to
shore 87°15'W, 41°55'N (referred to as the "halfway point") and over a nearshore
sampling site, a City of Chicago water intake crib 87°32 'W,  41°37'N.   Soundings
extended from about 15 m through about 1800m.  Flight times were approximately
0700-0900, 1100-1400 and occasionally 1600-1800 Central Daylight Time (CDT)
during September 26-30 of 1977 and May 17-19, 22, and 24-26 of 1978.
      Constrained and rotating vanes mounted on a nose boom of the aircraft
(Lenschow, 1971) were used to measure velocity.  Also en the aircraft were
fast-response pressure, temperature and humidity sensors.  These data were
recorded at a rate of 10 hz by an on-board data system (Glaser, 1973).
      Concurrently with the aircraft data, meteorological and aerosol data
were gathered at the surface.  During September of 1977, the data were
collected aboard the R/V -Simons at tne midlake sampling site
During May 1978, the surface sampling site was the water intake crib
                      Among other analyses of the surface data, trajectories
of the air parcels sampled were calculated backwards in time.  The  sampling site  •
wind vector was used for this trajectory as long as the parcel had not
penetrated the surface layer which was assumed to be at a height of 50 m.
The vertical velocity of the parcel was estimated by a momentum-analogue
deposition velocity calculated from the windspeed at 5m and the temperature
stability.  After penetration of the surface layer, the wind vector was

-------
                                    143
                                                                       4.
calculated from a weighted average of the surface data and a triangulation
average of National  Weater Service upper level  soundings.   The process is  more
fully described in Sievering et al.  (1979).   The trajectories, though they had
large uncertainties, were sufficiently accurate to  provide an  indication of
the source regions of the air sampled and a" means of calculating the degree
of windshift.
      An Active Scattering Aerosol Spectrometer (ASAS),  which  counted particles
in each of 60 size channels in the range 0.23 < d < 30.0 ym for September
data collection and 0.11 < d < 3.5 ym in May by scattering of  a He-Ne laser
source (see Schuster and Knollenberg, 1972), was mounted on board the aircraft.
During May 1978 a second ASAS was operated at the lake surface.   ASAS data
obtained during 1977 was collected at the midlake site.   Several instrument-
related problems make the validity of absolute numbers  suspect, but comparisons
between periods of ASAS operation should be realistic.   Integration of the
                                          o
aerosol size spectra multiplied by 4/3 )f r  and an  assumed particle density of
2 g cm"3 yields a measurement of total aerosol  mass per  volume of air sampled
 assuming sphericity of particles and uniform density.    An integrating
nephelomter (IN) allowed independent verification of mass measurements (see
Dave, Dolske,  and Sievering, 1979).

3.  Analysis
      The 10 hz values of the three velocity components  were analyzed by a
fast-Fourier transform method and the resultant spectra were plotted.  In
addition, the ratio of vertical to longitudinal velocity (SW/SU) was cal-
culated in the wavelength range 10 < X < 300m which was  presumed to lie
within the inertial  subrange.

-------
                                     144
                                                                        5.
       In  an  attempt  to  find  a  relationship  between  the  degree of  variability
    in wind  direction and  the  departure  from  isotropy,  a  "windshiftiness"
 parameter was developed.   This  parameter estimates  the  persistence of any
 one wind  direction as the  ratio of  path  length  to displacement or s/£,  where
 s  is  the  trajectory  path length and  i  is the  straight-line displacement of
 a  parcel  from start  to  end of  trajectory.   This parameter is unity for perfectly
 straight  flow and unbounded  above for  convoluted trajectories'.  A total of
 eleven flights occurred concurrently with surface sampling during September
 of 1977 and  May of 1978.   Of these,  two  could not be used because of faulty
 data  (see Table 1).  When  a  rank correlation was done between the "windshiftiness'
 parameter and   4/3  - SWSU I  , the rank correlation  coefficient was 0.925
 (see  Table 2) allowing one to reject the hypothesis of  zero correlation at
 better than  the one  percent  level.
      Comparison of  aerosol  mass measurements with  wind direction shifts is
 another method of investigating the  relationship between windshift and  near-
 surface effects.  It elucidates turbulence  behavior less directly, but  still
 involves a direct measurement of atmospheric aerosols.  ~    A case study of
midlake sampling site data for  the period from 18 May 1977 to 19 May 1977 is
 particularly relevant.  Table 3 lists six periods over which data were  collected,
and certain associated meteorological and aerosol  measurements.    In this
table, stability (AT) is the air temperature measured at a height of 5 m minus
the surface temperature (measured by infrared thermometry).   The wind speed
and wind direction were also measured at 5m.  All  values are averages of
measurements taken every fifteen mini/tes across the period indicated.  The
mass, calculated by  integration of the aerosol size spectra, allows one to
discriminate between mass due to fine particles(0.11 < d < 1 urn)  and an
estimated total  measured was by the IN (approximately 0.1 <  d <  1-0)

-------
                                    145
                                                                       6.  -
or the ASAS (0.11 < d < 3.5 ym).
      An abrupt windshift from 240° to 170° took place between  1230 and 1300
CDT on 18 May 1977, i.e.,  near the  start of data set  20080.  Before this period the
southern basin of Lake Michigan had been under west-south-westerly winds for
over 10 hours.  As a result the midlake area  and,  presumably^ points south
and southwest  were under the influence of the Chicago plume,  as  evidenced  by
the high mass measurements for data sets 20060 and  20070.   After  the windshift,
it should have taken about 4^ hours for the slightly  less  polluted  south-shore
plume, traveling at the mean wind velocity of  1.9 m sec~l,  to  reach the sampling
site.   Thus, only the last 20% of data set 20080 should have  been sampling
south shore air.  Yet, in spite of continued strong stability  and light wind
speeds, there is a sixfold drop in aerosol  mass. The large standard deviation
in the wind direction for data sets 20080 and  20090 resulted from the fact
that during this period, the wind direction swung from 180° to 100° and back
again.
      There is another abrupt windshift and, perhaps more important, a
severe decrease in the standard deviation on wind direction, between 2100 and
2200 on 18 May 1977.  A parcel which left shore at  this time would reach the
sampling site just about the time the heavily-loaded data set  20110 was begun.
In summary, the indication is that the period  of continuous windshift is
associated with a severe decrease in total  aerosol  mass near the  surface.

4.  Summary and Conclusions
      The ratio of vertical to longitudinal velocity in the inertia! subrange
was measured by aircraft over Lake Michigan.  When  near surface values of this
ratio were compared to an estimator of the degree of windshift, a correlation
was found suggesting that "windshiftiness" over Lake Michigan is  associated
with departures from isotropy, as would be expected if increased wind shifts

-------
                                    146
                                                                       7.
induced protrusions of roughness elements through the laminar sub-layer.
      A case study was presented in which wind shifts are followed by a
decrease in aerosol mass concentration, consistent with the hypothesis that
increases in the protrusion of roughness elements will promote direct impaction
of aerosols on the water surface.

-------
                                     147
                                                                            ' 8.
6.  Acknowledgements
      Appreciation is extended to the personnel of the Research Aviation
Facility (especially P. Spyers-Duran) and the Computing Facility of the National
Center for Atmospheric Research.  The plotting of trajectories was performed by
Vic Jensen and Patric McCoy.  Gratitude is expressed to Brenda Chapman for
preparation of the manuscript.
      This work was supported by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
under contracts R00530101 and R00542101.

-------
                                     148

References
Dave, Mehul, Donald Dolske, and Herman Sievering, Short Communication.
       "Atmospheric Aerosol Mass Concentration and Scattering Coefficient
       in a Midlake Region." Atmos. Environ., J.3, 1979,  1597-1600.

Gatz, D.F. 1975a:  Relative Contributions of Different Sources of Urban
       Aerosols: "Application of a New Estimation Method to Multiple Sites in
       Chicago." Atmos. Environ., 9_, 1-18.

Gatz, D.F., 1975b: "Pollutant Aerosol  Deposition into Southern Lake  Michigan."
       Water Air and Soil Poll., 5, 239-251.

Glaser, Walter, 1973:  "The Aris III Data System, Atmospheric Technology,
       March, 61-66.                                    	

Lenschow, D.H., 1971:  "Vanes for Sensing Incidence Angles of the Air from an
       Aircraft. J. Appl. Meteor.. 1Q, 1339-1343.

Schmitt, K.F., C.A. Friehe, ane C.H. Gibson, 1978:  Sea Surface Stress  Measure-
       ments.  Boundry-Layer Meteor.,  15, 215-228.

Schuster, B.G. and R. Knollenberg, 1972:   Detection and Sizing of Small  Particles
       in an Open Cavity Laser. Appl.  Opt.,  H.,  1515-1520.

Sehmel, G.A. and S.L. Sutter, 1974:  Pacific N.W. Lab Annual  Rep,  for 1971,
       Vol III, pt 1, Richland, WA. A  Batelle Northwest Laboratories.

SethuRaman, S., 1978:  Influence of Mean  Wind Direction on Sea Surface  Wave.
       Development. J.  Phys. Ocean, _8, 926-929.

Sievering, Herman, 1976:   Dry Deposition  Loading of Lake Michigan by Airborne
       Particulate Matter, Water Air and  Soil  Pollution, _5,  309-318.

Sievering, Herman, Mehul  Dave, Donald  A.  Dolske, Richard L.  Hughes and
       Patric  McCoy,  1979:  An Experimental  Study of Lake  Loading  by  Aerosol
       Transport and Dry Deposition in the Southern Lake Michigan Basin,
       Chicago, II, U.S.  Environmental Protection AGency publication No.
       EPA-905/4-79-016.

Sievering, Herman, 1980:   Profile Measurements of Particle Mass Transfer  at
       the Air/Water Interface [Accepted  for publication in  Atmospheric
       Environment].

Skibin, D. 1973:  Comment on Water Pollution in  Lake Michigan from Pollution
       Aerosol  Fallout, Water Air and  Soil Poll., 2, 405-407.

Slinn, W.G.N.,  L.  Hosse,  B.B. Hicks, A.W., Hogan, P. Lae, P.S.  Liss,  K.O.J.
       Munnich, G.A.  Sehmel  and 0.  Vittori,  1978:  Some Aspects of the
       Transfer at ATmospheric Trace Constituents Past the Air-Sea Interface,
       Atmos.  Env., 12, 2055-2087.

-------
                                    149

                                                                             10.
SI inn, W.G.N., 1979:   Predictions for Particle Deposition  on  Natural  Waters,
       private communication.

Williams, R.N., M.L.  Wesly and B.B.  Hicks,  1980:   Preliminary Eddy Correlation
       Measurements of Momentum, Heat, and  Particle  Fluxes to Lake Michigan,
       Radiological and Environmental  Research Division  Report,  Argonne
       National Laboratory report No.  ANL-78-65 part III.

-------
                                    150
                                                                            11,
Table Captions
    Various meterological parameters measured over Lake Michigan during
    September 1977 and May 1978.
    Rank of "windshiftiness" parameter and
    Lake Michigan during September 1977 and
 4/3 - Sw/Su  measured over
Nay 1978.
3.  Sample time meteorological parameters and aerosol data measured over
    Lake Michigan during May of 1977.

-------
   151
                                           12.

TABLE 1
Date
26 Sept.
17 Sept.
27 Sept.
27 Sept.
17 May
18 May
19 May
24 May
25 May
Time
1641
0639
1109
1636
0650
1130
1145
1130
1145
(CDT)
- 1810
- 0919
- 1344
- 1823
- 1810
- 1256
- 1330
- 1420
- 1447
Average
Wind
Direction
265
319
300
295
4
69
91
25
90
Average
Wind
Speed (m sec"1)
6.0
7.4
6.5
6.1
3.5
3.0
3.5
1.4
5,7
Wind-
shiftiness
Parameter
1.0
1.03
1.01
1.01
1.07
1.11
1.004
1.08
1.42

-------
 152
                                         13.
TABLE 2
Date
27 Sept
27 Sept
27 Sept
27 Sept
17 May
18 May
19 May
24 May
25 May
Time
1641
0639
1109
1636
0650
1130
1145
1130
1145
(CDT)
- 1810
- 0919
- 1344
- 1823
- 0810
- 1256
- 1330
- 1420
- 1447
Rank of
Wind- Rank of
Shiftiness 4/3 - SW/SU
9 8
5 5
6.5 7
6.5 6
4 2.5
2 1
8 9
3 4
1 2.5

-------
                      eteorology
Aerosol Mass
Data Set
20060
20070
20080
20090
20100
20110
Time (CDT)
5/18 03:00-5/18 06:00
5/18 08:20-5/18 11:20
5/18 12:00-5/18 17:25
5/18 17:45-5/18 21:00
5/18 22:00-5/19 01:30
5/19 01:45-5/19 06:15



AT
5
6
9
11
13
7
.9
.7
.5
:4
.3
.2
± 1.4
± 3.6
± 3.5
± 3.7
± 2.1
± 2.9
T-
TT(5)
(m/s)
4.5 ±
3.6 ±
1.9 ±
3.8 ±
3.7 ±
2.7 ±

0.2
0.3
0.6
0.3
0.9
0.4
lu
240
239
174
140
212
212
IN-derived
Mass
± 10
± 8
± 46
± 40
± 8
+ 26
125
266
141
110
47
141
ASAS dervied Mass
< 1.0 ym
160
174
29
29
19
133
Total
169
193
31
34
23
333
Table 3.  Sample Time, Meteorological  Parameters, and
          Aerosol Data Measured over Lake Michigan
          during May of 1977

-------
                        154
43°00'
                        o
                        o
                        o

                        00
O
ro
o
CD
00
                LAKE  MICHIGAN
O
O
o
CD
00
                           MIDLAKE
                   HALFWAY POINT
                                0   10 20 30 40 50
        Figure 1. Location of Sampling Sites.

-------
TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
(I'L ?.!, rcaJlHUnjcrit'ns o>, thrrc>ir\t bclort complctiifi
1 REPORT NO I? 3 REUP
EPA-9Q5/2-84-002 |
4 TITLE ANDSUBTiTLE 5 BEPO
An Experimental Study of Lake Loading By Aerosol J
Transport and Dry Deposition in the Lake Erie Basin S.PERF
7 AUTHORiS) 8 PERF
H. Sievering, D. A. Dolske, V. Jensen and
R. L. Huges
9 PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS 10 PRO
Governors State University
Univeibily Park, Illinois G04GC 11. CON
ROD
ROO.
12 SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS 13. TYP
Res
U. 5. Environmental Protection Agency 14. SPO
Great Lakes National Program Office gre
536 South Clark Street, Room 958 Off
Chicaao. : 1! inois 60605

lENT'S ACCESSION NO.
RT DATE
une 1984
DRMING ORGANIZATION CODE
DRMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
GRAM ELEMENT NO.
TRACT/GRANT NO.
33010!
542101
E OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
aarch 979
MSORING AGENCY CODE
at Lakes National Program
ice, U.S. EPA, Region V
15 SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
Ed Klappenbach
Project Officer
16 ABSTRACT
The purpose of this study of Lake Erie was to obtain an ove" lake data base
and to relate aerosol chemical constituent loadings. Information collected
at each scale is necessary to expand our und9rstand i nq of the complex
aerosol transport and deposition process that occur over the lake,
ft is believed these results obtained from the Great Lakes Atmospheric
Depos ition(GLAD) network, should lead to a more generalized understand ng
of aerosol transport and deposition in the Great Lakes region, as well as
a better estimation of atmospheric-route Great Lakes Pol ution loading.
T7 KE V WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
o DESCRIPTORS b. IDENTIFIERS'OPEN ENDE
Dry loading
Wet loading
Aerosol transport
Chemica I ana I ys is
Monitor! ng
Air po! ! utants
S ite samp I i ng
IS DiSTP.BJTiON STATEMENT IS SE C U R IT Y C L ASS (This t
Document is available to the public through
the National Technical Information Service 20 SECURITY CLASS cr/,,*,
(NT1S), Springfield, VA 22161 Unclassified

D TERMS v COS AT! Held Group

Report) 21 NO OF PAGES
168
lapij 22. PRICE
EPA Forrn 2220-1 (9-73)

-------