United States
            Environmental Protection
            Agency
             Office of Research and
             Development
             Washington DC 20460
EPA/600/2-91/006
February 1991
c/EPA
Techniques to Determine
Spatial Variations in
Hydraulic Conductivity of
Sand and Gravel

-------
                                                   EPA/600/2-91/006
                                                   February 1991
TECHNIQUES TO DETERMINE SPATIAL VARIATIONS IN HYDRAULIC
              CONDUCTIVITY OF SAND AND GRAVEL
                                by

                           Kathryn M. Hess
                         U.S. Geological Survey
                    Marlborough, Massachusetts 01752

                            Steven H. Wolf
                   Massachusetts Institute of Technology
                     Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139
                        Interagency Agreement
                            DW14932020
                            Project Officer

                            Robert W. Puls
                  Processes and Systems Research Division
              Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Laboratory
                         Ada, Oklahoma 74820
     ROBERT S. KERR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY
             OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
             U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                       ADA, OKLAHOMA 74820

                                              (£jy Printed on Recycled Paper

-------
   r                             DISCLAIMER

    The information in this document has been funded wholly or in part by the United
States Environmental Protection Agency under Interagency Agreement DW14932020 to
the U.S. Geological Survey.  The report has been subjected to the Agency's peer and
administrative review, and has been  approved for publication as an EPA  document.
Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement  or
recommendation for use.
                                       11

-------
                                   FOREWORD

    The Environmental Protection Agency was established to coordinate administration of
the major Federal programs designed to protect the quality of our environment.
    An important part of the Agency's effort involves the search for information about
environmental problems, management techniques,  and new technologies through which
                                                    t
optimum use of the Nation's' land and water resources can be assured and the threat
pollution poses to the welfare of the American people can be minimized.
    EPA's Office of Research and Development conducts this search through a nationwide
network of research facilities.
    As one of the facilities, the Robert S.  Kerr Environmental Research Laboratory is the
Agency's center  of expertise for investigation of the soil and subsurface  environment.
Personnel at the laboratory are responsible for management of research programs to: (a)
determine the fate, transport, and transformation rates of pollutants  in  the  soil, the
unsaturated zone, and the saturated zones of the subsurface environment; (b) define the
processes to be used in characterizing the soil and subsurface environment as a receptor of
pollutants; (c) develop techniques for predicting the effect of pollutants on ground water,
soil, and indigenous organisms; and  (d) define and demonstrate the applicability and
limitations of using natural processes,  indigenous to the soil and subsurface  environment,
for the protection of this resource.
    This  report contributes  to that knowledge which is  essential in  order for EPA to
establish and enforce pollution control standards which are reasonable, cost effective, and
provide adequate  environmental protection  for the  American public.   It  provides an
assessment of state-of-the-art methods for determining small-scale variations in important
aquifer properties needed for accurate modeling of contaminant transport in subsurface
systems.
                                      Clinton W. Hall, Director
                                      Robert S. Kerr Environmental
                                      Research Laboratory
                                        111

-------
                                   ABSTRACT

    Methods for determining small-scale variations in aquifer properties were investigated
for a sand and gravel aquifer on Cape Cod, Massachusetts.  Measurements of aquifer
properties, in particular hydraulic conductivity, are needed for further investigations into
the effects of  aquifer heterogeneity on macrodispersion, or the enhanced dispersion of
solutes in aquifers.  The primary methods used to measure vertical profiles of hydraulic
conductivity were multiple-port  permeameter  analysis  of cores and  impeller-flowmeter
hydraulic  tests  in  long-screened  wells.    More  than  1,600  hydraulic-conductivity
measurements have been made using these methods.  Several other methods of measuring
aquifer properties also were investigated, including piezometer tests, geophysical borehole
logs, and ground-penetrating radar.
    This report was submitted in fulfillment of Interagency Agreement No. DW14932020
by the U.S. Geological Survey under the partial sponsorship of the U.S.  Environmental
Protection Agency.  This report  covers a period from August 15, 1986, to December 31,
1987.
                                        IV

-------
                                   CONTENTS

Foreword	iii
Abstract	iv
Figures	vi
Acknowledgements	vii

       1. Introduction	1
       2. Purpose and scope	3
       3. Sampling locations	5
       4. Coring procedure	5
       5. Permeameter analysis of cores	8
             Tests of analytical procedure	10
             Hydraulic conductivity of cores	12
       6. Flowmeter measurements	15
       7. Preliminary analysis of spatial distribution of hydraulic conductivity	16
       8. Other techniques for determining hydraulic conductivity	19
       9. Summary	23

References	25

-------
                                    FIGURES

Number                                                                       Page
   1   Location of study site on Cape Cod, Massachusetts	2
   2   Longitudinal section of nonreactive bromide cloud, 33 days after injection	4
   3   Location of ground-penetrating radar lines, trenching, and boreholes for
         coring and hydraulic tests	6
   4   Multiple-port, constant-head permeameter used to analyze hydraulic
         conductivity of core sections	9
   5   X-ray images of core after analysis on permeameter	11
   6   Vertical profile of hydraulic conductivity in core TT3 measured with
         constant-head, multiple-port permeameter	14
   7   Vertical profile of horizontal hydraulic conductivity around well F417-64
         measured with borehole flowmeter technique (a), and natural gamma log
         from well F417-64 (b)	17
   8   One-dimensional variogram analysis of hydraulic-conductivity
         measurements from well F417-64	18
   9   Vertical profile of horizontal hydraulic conductivity measured in six wells
         in cluster F347 using piezometer  method	21
  10   Ground-penetrating radar images from study site	22
                                        VI

-------
                            ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

    Although only two names appear on the author list, this report reflects the work of
many, including Stephen P. Garabedian and Denis R. LeBlanc of the Geological Survey,
and Michael A. Celia and Lynn W. Gelhar of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology
(MIT). The authors would also like to thank Richard D. Quadri and John L. Organek of
the Geological Survey for their assistance in the field operations and Kenneth Rehfeldt,
now with the Illinois Water Survey, for his patience in teaching us the borehole flowmeter
technique.
    This work was a joint effort of the Geological Survey and MIT. The MIT part of this
work was supported through Cooperative Agreement  No. 14-08-0001-A0460 with the
Geological Survey.  Funding for this project was provided by the U.S. Environmental
Protection  Agency  Robert  S.  Kerr Environmental  Research  Laboratory,  through
Interagency Agreement No. DW14932020, and the U.S. Geological Survey Toxic Waste
Ground-Water Contamination Program.
                                      VII

-------
                                1. INTRODUCTION

    An understanding of the effects of aquifer heterogeneity on solute-transport processes
is needed to improve the ability to predict the movement and attenuation of contaminants
in the subsurface (Anderson, 1979,1987). This report outlines an effort to develop and test
laboratory  and field  techniques  for  determining the spatial heterogeneity of aquifer
hydraulic conductivity.   Several techniques were  investigated  and  measurements of
hydraulic conductivity and other aquifer properties were obtained at a field site on Cape
Cod, Massachusetts. A sampling strategy was designed so that sufficient data would be
collected to accurately represent the variability of properties  in the aquifer statistically.
These measurements of aquifer properties compose a comprehensive data base which will
be used to investigate the relation between macrodispersion, or the enhanced dispersion of
solutes in aquifers, and the heterogeneity of aquifer properties.
    The aquifer that is the focus of this study is within a sand and gravel outwash plain on
Cape Cod, Massachusetts (fig. 1).  The stratified glacial outwash at the Cape Cod site is
approximately 30 meters thick and is underlain by finer, less permeable sand. The aquifer
is unconfined, and the water table is approximately 6 meters below land surface.  This
aquifer is typical of many  glaciofluvial  aquifers in  the northeastern part of the United
States. Many sites designated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency as Superfund
sites are located in this type of aquifer.
    Part of the sand and gravel aquifer is contaminated by more than 50 years of land
disposal  of treated sewage  from  Otis Air Base  (LeBlanc, 1984).   The  plume of
contaminated  ground water  extends  more  than 3,500 meters  downgradient from the
sewage-treatment plant, is  as much  as  1,100 meters wide and  25 meters thick, and is
overlain  by as much  as 15  meters of  uncontaminated water.  This  aquifer has been
designated a sole-source aquifer, serving as a source of drinking water for Cape Cod (U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, 1982).
    Investigations into the relation between macrodispersion of solutes in the aquifer and
heterogeneity of hydraulic conductivity have  been an integral part of the U.S. Geological
Survey's research at the Cape  Cod site since it was chosen in 1983 as a research site for the
Geological Survey Toxic Waste Ground-Water Contamination Program. As part of the

-------
                                7IW

        war    ma    rns
       MASSACHUSETTS

     0     25     SO MILES
     I  . i . . I	[_
                   TOO KllOlttTOB
                         41MOT -
                         41'3(r
                                                                          I
                                                                         10 KILOMETERS
Figure 1.    Location of study site on Cape Cod, Massachusetts.

-------
 dispersion studies, a large-scale,  natural-gradient tracer test was conducted at the site.
Reactive (lithium and molybdate) and nonreactive (bromide) tracers were injected in July
1985 and monitored as they travelled about 280 meters during a 3-year period. The tracers
were monitored by using more than 600 multilevel samplers, each with 15 sampling ports in
the vertical direction.
    Figure 2  shows a  longitudinal  cross-section  of concentrations  of  the nonreactive
species, bromide, in the tracer cloud after 33 days of travel through the aquifer.  The
complex nature of the cloud, as indicated by the irregular shapes of the bromide contours,
was probably produced by variations in ground-water velocity that resulted from the spatial
variability  of  hydraulic conductivity.  These velocity variations  are likely causing  the
macrodispersion observed in the field.   Dispersivity values  of 0.96  meters,  1.8  cm
(centimeters), and 0.15  cm were obtained from this field experiment for  the, longitudinal,
transverse   horizontal,  and  transverse  vertical   dispersivities,  respectively.    These
dispersivities were calculated using 16 synoptic views of the tracer cloud as it traveled 280
meters downgradient over 17 months (Garabedian and others, 1987; Garabedian, 1987).
    Recently,  several theories have been  developed that relate  macrodispersion and  the
statistical  properties of the  spatial  distribution of hydraulic conductivity  (Gelhar and
Axness, 1983; Dagan, 1984; Neuman, 1987). The data on aquifer heterogeneity collected in
this project will be used to test the application of these theories to field situations.  The
dispersivity values calculated from these theories can then be compared with those values
measured in the aquifer by the tracer test.
                             2. PURPOSE AND SCOPE

    The major purposes of this project were to develop,  test, and compare methods for
measuring hydraulic conductivity, or other aquifer properties which  may correlate with
hydraulic  conductivity, and to  obtain  enough measurements using these methods from
representative locations in the aquifer so that a statistically based, three-dimensional data
base would be created. This comprehensive data base will be used later to investigate the
relation between macrodispersion and the heterogeneity of aquifer properties, in particular
hydraulic conductivity.
    Two primary methods—permeameter analysis of cores and borehole flowmeter logs—
and  several other methods-piezometer tests, borehole  geophysical logs, and ground-

-------
  CO
O Hi
LU
Q
h-j
  UJ
  CO
          NORTH
       11 -
                       F415
           VERTICAL EXAGGERATION 2X
10                 20

DISTANCE, IN METERS
                                                     SOUTH
                                                                                    30
40
                                                EXPLANATION

                                  -10—LINE OF EQUAL BROMIDE CONCENTRATION-
                                        Concentratlons in milligrams per liter.
                                        Interval varlea.
                 Figure 2.    Longitudinal section of nonreactive bromide cloud, 33 days after injection (from
                            Garabedian, 1987, fig. 53).

-------
penetrating radar-were used in this study to obtain measures of hydraulic conductivity and
other aquifer properties at the site on Cape Cod, Massachusetts.  This report outlines the
testing and application of each of these techniques.  A summary of the data, as well as a
description of the variability in aquifer properties determined from these measurements,
will be included in future publications.
                            3.  SAMPLING LOCATIONS

    The site of the aquifer heterogeneity investigations,  as well as the natural-gradient
tracer test, is an abandoned gravel pit immediately south  of Otis Air Base on Cape Cod,
Massachusetts (fig. 1).  The locations within the gravel pit of boreholes for coring and for
flowmeter testing were selected to maximize the number  of spatial comparisons between
measurements and to vary the horizontal separation between measurement sites.  This
sampling scheme will permit the construction of a three-dimensional statistical description
of the variability of hydraulic conductivity.  Figure 3 shows  the location of these boreholes;
most are concentrated in the central area shown in the figure inset. Three flowmeter wells
are located outside the central area-two at the northern end of the gravel pit and one at
the southern end. The boreholes in the central area were installed in three  groups. Ten
coring locations were spaced between 1 to 8  meters apart  along a 22-meter-long transect.
The second group included ten flowmeter wells spaced along a line as an approximate
mirror image of the core transect.  Both of these transects were alined approximately
parallel to the  mean  direction of ground-water flow and the  hypothesized  direction of
deposition of the outwash. The third group included six coring locations and six flowmeter
wells in a cluster at the intersection of the  two  lines. One flowmeter well was placed in a
hole from which cores had also been collected  for a direct comparison between hydraulic
conductivities measured using the flowmeter and permeameter methods.
                            4. CORING PROCEDURE

    The aquifer is an unconsolidated sand and 'gravel deposit, typically containing less than
one percent finer-grained silt and clay.  Standard coring techniques, such as wire-line, mud-
rotary  coring,  were  not  successful  in  recovering  samples  of this  noncohesive,

-------
OS
~l U -
-80-

-90 -

100

110 •

i
o
o
0
o
o
- 1

X
X
X
X
X
	 l_
                   -20
-10
                     DISTANCE FROM F343
                         IN METERS
                                                                  GRAVEL  PIT
    EXPLANATION

•  WELL OR WELL CLUSTER

O  FLOWMETER WELL

X  CORING  LOCATION
                                                              Feet
                                                         100    200
                                                                                                   300
                                                                                          50
                                                                                         Meters
                                                                          100
                     Figure 3.   Location of ground-penetrating radar lines, trenching, and boreholes for coring and
                               hydraulic tests.

-------
unconsolidated aquifer material.  Samples obtained with the split spoon technique were
found to be disturbed and not representative of the aquifer material.  A new coring
technique developed at the University of Waterloo for sampling cohesionless sand and
gravel below the water table (Zapico and others, 1987) was successfully tested at the site
and was used to collect representative, relatively undisturbed cores for this study.
    This coring technique involved hollow-stem augering (8.3-cm-inside-diameter augers),
with a center bit in place, to the top of the interval to be cored.  The augers were filled with
drilling mud or water to balance formation pressures. The center bit was removed and the
core barrel, which had been loaded with a 5-cm-diameter aluminum liner, was lowered on
drill rod through the augers.  A piston was positioned in the drive shoe of the core barrel.
A cable running from the piston, through the barrel and up  the augers to the drill rig, was
held in place while the  core barrel was driven 1.5 meters into  the formation,  past the
piston. A vacuum was  created on  the  sample in the liner  using this  procedure.  The
vacuum was maintained by the piston as the barrel was retrieved using the attached cable.
Because of this vacuum, formation water was retained in the core.  The core remained
saturated for hydraulic-conductivity analysis if the liner was properly sealed after removal
from the barrel.
    Core recovery averaged approximately 90 percent of the 1.5 meters that the barrel was
driven (Hess and others,  1987). Recovery tended to be better when drilling mud filled the
augers; however, some infiltration of mud into the sample typically occurred. When water
was used as the drilling fluid, some core material usually fell out of the bottom of the barrel
as it was brought  to the  surface;  therefore,  total recovery  tended to be  less.   Both
procedures were used to obtain cores for this study. Six holes for coring were drilled using
only water; ten were drilled using drilling mud.
    The extent of the mud contamination of core samples  was investigated before cores
were obtained for measurement of hydraulic conductivity. The bentonite drilling mud was
labeled with fluorescent rhodamine dye. Recovered test cores were sectioned and the pore
fluid was extracted from each section.  This fluid was analyzed  using a fluorometer to
determine if fluorescent mud had infiltrated into the sample.  Major mud contamination
was  observed in the upper section of the cores.   This was expected because of the
unavoidable delay between removing the center bit from the augers and coring, during
which  time mud was in direct contact with the top of the interval to be cored.  Some
infiltration was also  detected in the bottom of the cores because of contact with the mud as
the barrel was brought to land surface.  The hydraulic conductivity of these end sections

-------
was not measured by the permeameter method described later in this report, so the mud
infiltration was  thought  to be inconsequential  for  this study.    For  geochemical
investigations, such as determining distribution coefficients for the sediment, even minor
infiltration of  the bentonite  drilling mud  could have significant  effects on  results.
Therefore, six cores were obtained using only water so that these cores could be analyzed
for hydraulic  conductivity  and  then  used for a separate investigation into chemical
heterogeneity of the aquifer.
    A total of 95 meters of core was obtained from 16;boreholes (fig. 3). From 6 to 7.5
meters of aquifer were cored at each location. All coring occurred below the water table.
                     5. PERMEAMETER ANALYSIS OF CORES

    A standard laboratory technique for determining saturated hydraulic conductivity is to
repack a sample of the aquifer into a permeameter, establish  a flow through the sample,
and then measure the head loss across  the  sample.   By applying Darcy's equation,  a
laboratory value for the hydraulic conductivity can then be calculated from the flow rate
and the head loss  across the sample.  Two problems were  identified with this standard
procedure: (1) Small-scale variabilities in hydraulic conductivity are not measured because
of the large sample volume needed for the test, and (2) sedimentary structure is destroyed
because the sample is repacked into the permeameter. The permeameter analysis method
developed in this study at the Ralph M. Parsons Laboratory of the Massachusetts Institute
of Technology (MIT) eliminates these two problems.
    A multiple-port permeameter (fig. 4) was developed to measure hydraulic conductivity
of small subsections of the undisturbed cores  in the aluminum liners in which  the cores
were collected.  The permeameter design and procedure were modified from those used to
measure hydraulic conductivity of fine-grained soil cores taken at  Columbus  Air  Force
Base, Mississippi  (Boggs, in preparation).   With this  design  the saturated  core was
connected directly into the permeameter  with the aluminum liner serving as the sample
vessel.   As a result, the  sample remained in the state in which it was removed from the
aquifer.  Along the length of the  core, thin pneumatic needles, connected to manometers,
were inserted through the liner  and into the  center of the core.  As with the standard
permeameter procedure, a constant hydraulic-head gradient was maintained after flow was
established up through the core.  Head loss was then measured between manometer ports.
                                        8

-------
                                  Manometers
   Constant Head
Effluent Reservoir
                                                     Constant Head
                                                     Supply  Reservoir
    Figure 4.   Multiple-port, constant-head permeameter used to analyze hydraulic conductivity of
              core sections.

-------
Because hydraulic conductivity is inversely proportional to head loss, hydraulic conductivity
for each 8- to 12-cm section of core between manometer ports was calculated using Darcy's
equation.

TESTS OF ANALYTICAL PROCEDURE

    Hydraulic-conductivity measurements  were first performed  on nine test cores to
evaluate the permeameter and to develop an efficient procedure to minimize measurement
errors. A major concern was the effect the presence of needles in the samples would have
on measurements of hydraulic conductivity. Control tests included varying the location and
alinement of the needles along the core, inserting multiple needles at the same level of the
core, and varying the depth of needle penetration into the core. Comparison of measured
hydraulic conductivities showed no significant differences among the control tests. X-rays
of a core after measurement showed no visible disturbances around the needles (fig. 5).
    Cores that remained on the permeameter more than several days displayed  decreasing
hydraulic conductivity in sections near the inlet. This trend was reversed with the addition
of chlorine or sodium azide to the influent water,  which suggested biological growth and
concomitant clogging of  the  pore channels as the  cause  of  the decrease  in hydraulic
conductivity . These clogging problems could be avoided by making the measurements of
hydraulic conductivity within a period of 6 to 12 hours after the cores were set up on the
permeameter.
    Most  cores appeared to be still saturated when the endcaps were removed; that is,
standing water was found on the top  of most cores.   However, in several  test cores,
desaturation of up to 50 percent, which had occurred during handling and storage, resulted
in the measurement of lower and somewhat variable unsaturated hydraulic conductivities.
Hence, greater care was taken to preserve the saturation of the cores by insuring that end
seals were water tight during storage.  In those few  instances where cores  appeared
unsaturated when opened, hydraulic-conductivity measurements were not made.  Instead,
these  cores have been allowed to dry completely and will be resaturated by the method
outlined by Rad and Clough (1984) before measurements are made.
    The presence of large gravels in the cores was hypothesized to adversely affect the
results of permeameter analyses.  X-ray photographs and visual inspection of extruded test
cores showed a heterogeneous structure ranging from fine sand to gravels approaching the
diameter of the core liner (fig. 5). Several core sections containing large gravels were
                                        10

-------
    large
    gravel
       cross
       bedding
       in sand
                                          interbedded
                                          sands and
                                          gravels
                                                               permeameter
                                                               needles
                   ACTUAL  SIZE
Figure 5.   X-ray images of core after analysis on permeameter.

-------
repacked to test for the effects on measured hydraulic conductivity.  Repacked sections
with the gravels removed showed significantly higher conductivity when the  gravel size
exceeded one-half of the core diameter, 5-cm. Below this size, the gravels had  little effect
on the measured value of hydraulic conductivity for the 8- to 12-cm sections of core used in
this study.
    Hydraulic-conductivity measurements were found to be stable over flow rates ranging
from 0.005 to 0.02 cm/s (centimeters per second). Flow through cores on the permeameter
was varied by changing the level of the influent reservoir.  Although these flow rates are
typically 10 to 50 times the estimated average field flow rate, they are well within the range
where the Darcy equation is valid.  However, to  reduce the chance of displacing fine
sediments within the  core,  hydraulic-conductivity measurements  were  made  at the
minimum flow necessary to establish a measurable head drop over individual  sections  of
core.

HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY OF CORES

    Based on these and other tests, the following procedure for measuring hydraulic
conductivity of the study cores was adopted:
    1.  Sealed, saturated cores arriving from  the field were first X-rayed with a one
minute  exposure at 160 kilovolts and 3.8 milliamps.  Cores were  logged by  identifying
sections of similar gross  morphological features on the X-ray negatives.  Sections that
contained gravels larger than one-half the core liner diameter or  that included significant
void spaces were identified because hydraulic-conductivity measurements of these sections
were considered invalid and were not included in the data base.
    2.  Holes were drilled through the  core liner at intervals selected using the X-ray
logs.  Rubber ports were glued  over these holes,  and pneumatic needles were inserted
through the ports into the center of the core.
    3.  Endcaps were placed on the core, manometer  tubes  were connected  to the
needles, and flow was initiated through the core.  The flow rate was increased  until a
minimum of 1 cm of head loss was measured over each section of core. At least three pore
volumes of water were passed through the core to allow the flow to stabilize.
    4.  Manometer levels were measured and the water temperature was recorded  so
that all results could be corrected for viscosity variations and  reported at  a common
                                        12

-------
temperature.  Temperature-corrected hydraulic-conductivity values were  calculated for
each section.
    5.   Manometer levels were measured several times at each flow rate to test for the
stability of the measurements over time.  The arithmetic mean and the standard deviation
of the temperature-corrected hydraulic-conductivity values for each section were added to
a computer data base along with the three-dimensional coordinates of the midpoint of the
section. An anomalously high standard deviation for a given section often indicated that a
manometer port was clogged.  In this case, corrective action was taken and the test was
repeated.
    To date (March 1988), the permeameter has been used to make about 600 individual
hydraulic-conductivity measurements from 11 boreholes.  Values range from 0.008 to 0.1
cm/s at 10 °C , with most falling between 0.02 and 0.04 cm/s. A typical vertical profile of
hydraulic conductivity is shown in figure 6.  The blank parts of the profile result from the
loss of core during drilling, from the inability to measure  the hydraulic conductivity of the
4- to 5-cm sections at each end of the core, and from the  unreliability of measurements of
sections containing large gravels or voids. For example,  5.4 meters of core were collected
over a 6-meter vertical interval of the aquifer for the core  shown in figure 6, and hydraulic-
conductivity measurements were made on sixty-three 5- to 10-cm sections, totaling 4.3
meters.  Measurements were not included for the ends of the cores  and for five sections
containing  large gravels.  Large voids or disturbances associated with coring have been
detected in only a few instances for short sections of core.
    A bias may be introduced in the data base by the exclusion of trie sections containing
large gravels.   Gravelly  zones in glacial outwash may have  the  highest  hydraulic
conductivities  in the aquifer.  A larger diameter core would have increased the number of
valid measurements made on cores that contained gravels by increasing the sample volume.
    When  all  analyses are  completed, a  data base  of more than  1,000 hydraulic-
conductivity measurements will exist for points ranging  from approximately 0.05 to 7.5
meters apart in the vertical and from 0.9 to 24.0 meters apart in the horizontal.  This data
base will allow determination of the statistical structure of the hydraulic-conductivity
variability (the horizontal and vertical correlation scales and the mean and variance of the
natural logarithm of hydraulic conductivity) which can be compared with that determined
by other techniques.
                                         13

-------
           13
           12  -
           11  -
       z
       rf
           10
       UJ
       §
       m
            6
            0.001                        0.01                         0.1
              HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY, IN CENTIMETERS PER SECOND

Figure 6.    Vertical profile of hydraulic conductivity in core TT3 measured with constant-head,
           multiple-port permeameter. Location of coring shown on figure 3.
                                         14

-------
                        6. FLOWMETER MEASUREMENTS

    The second method used to obtain vertical profiles of hydraulic conductivity is the
impeller-flowmeter hydraulic test.  Nineteen long-screened wells were installed at the Cape
Cod site for these single-well aquifer tests.  All but one of these wells were installed by a
drive-and-wash technique.  This procedure involved augering to the water table, which is
approximately 6 meters below land surface; pulling the augers straight out;  lowering 8.8-
cm-diameter steel casing into the open hole; then driving the casing, in stages, to the
desired depth of the well. Three meters of casing were driven into the aquifer at a time,
followed by washing out of almost all the sediment driven into the casing. Some sediment
was left in the drive shoe to insure that material outside of the casing did not get washed
into the casing.  After completion depth was reached, the plastic well casing was lowered
into place and the steel drive casing was removed.
    Each well was constructed of 5-cm-diameter, flush-joint threaded polyvinyl-chloride
casing which was screened over a 12-meter interval below the water table.  The drive-and-
wash technique was used for well installation because it was determined at this site to cause
the least disturbance of the aquifer of the three techniques compared--drive-and-wash,
hollow-stem augering, and mud-rotary (Morin and others, 1988).  One well was installed in
conjunction with coring in  an augered hole.  Comparison of flowmeter results and  core
analyses from this borehole will allow us to further evaluate the impact of drilling methods
and to make a direct comparison of these two methods of measuring hydraulic conductivity
in a future report.
    To date (March 1988), vertical profiles of horizontal hydraulic conductivity have been
obtained in 13 of the  19 boreholes using  the flowmeter  technique.  This method was
originally developed by Hufschmied (1986) and further  refined at MIT (Rehfeldt and
others, 1989).  The well was pumped at a known, constant rate with the pump intake
positioned just below the water level. After an apparent steady-state pumping condition
was achieved in the well, vertical volumetric  flow was  measured at 0.15-meter intervals
over the screened section  of  the well using  a highly sensitive impeller flowmeter.  In
addition, drawdown in the pumped well was measured.  From these measurements, mean
radial flow to the well was calculated for the set  of 0.15-meter-thick horizontal layers.
Piezometric head  values were calculated  for  each layer,  using  results  of  a  laboratory
calibration procedure of the flowmeter in 5-cm diameter casing during which head losses
                                        15

-------
along the borehole were  determined.   Hydraulic conductivity  in each layer was then
calculated from the estimates of head and measurements of flow rate.
    Figure 7a shows a  typical profile  of hydraulic conductivity as measured with the
flowmeter  in  long-screened boreholes at  the  site.   The measurements of hydraulic
conductivity shown in this profile range over an order of magnitude, from 0.02 to 0.26 cm/s,
with a geometric mean of 0.06 cm/s. The short blank sections in the profile correspond to
the location of unscreened sections of the casing at the threaded joints.   About  70
measurements of hydraulic conductivity are typically obtained in each borehole. When all
boreholes are  logged using the flowmeter technique, a'data base of approximately 1,300
hydraulic-conductivity values will be assembled.  To date (March 1988), almost 1,000 data
points have been obtained. As with the data base of permeameter values, this flowmeter
data base will permit a comprehensive statistical analysis of the three-dimensional variation
in hydraulic conductivity at this site.
    7.  PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS OF SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF HYDRAULIC-
                                 CONDUCTIVITY

    The  major purposes  of  this project  were to develop  and compare methods for
measuring hydraulic  conductivity  and  to obtain enough  measurements using these
techniques so that a  statistically based, three-dimensional data base would  be created.
Complete analysis of this data base will be done in a future project. A preliminary analysis
has been completed at this point and therefore will be reported below.
    Qualitative  analysis  of  available  hydraulic-conductivity   data  from   completed
permeameter and flowmeter tests reveals  several zones of similar hydraulic conductivity
traceable between boreholes.  Some of these zones span as much as 4 meters horizontally,
but only 0.5 meters vertically.
    Preliminary statistical  analyses of the hydraulic-conductivity data also have  been
performed.  Correlation within the spatially varying field of hydraulic conductivity can be
identified using the variogram analysis technique (Olea, 1975).  In particular, correlation
scales  can be resolved.  Figure  8  shows a typical vertical variogram developed for the
flowmeter data from  one borehole.  This example is a one-dimensional  analysis of the
natural logarithm of hydraulic-conductivity measurements  shown in figure 7a.  Over 50
                                        16

-------
   20
to
o:
    15
UJ

UJ


5  10
to
UJ

O
CD


UJ
Q



1   5
<
                         DISCHARGE = 1.04 L/S
                         DRAWDOWN = 0.17 M
                                                                                                20
                                                         b)
                                                                   20            40

                                                                 COUNTS PER SECOND
     0.01                  0.1                   10

HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY, IN CENTIMETERS PER SECOND

          Figure 7.   (a) Vertical profile of horizontal hydraulic conductivity around well F417-64

                    measured with borehole flowmeter technique, (b) Natural gamma log from well

                    F417-64. Location of borehole shown on figure 3.
                                                                                                15
                                                                                                10
60

-------
                0.30
oo
                                                        FITTED EXPONENTIAL MODEL:
                                                          7 = tr-
                                                             = Variance = 0.26
                                                          X = Correlation Scale
                o.oo
                                             1.0            1.5           2.0
                                           X, SEPARATION OF PAIRS, IN METERS
                      Figure 8.   One-dimensional variogram analysis of hydraulic-conductivity measurements from
                                well F417-64. Measurements were made with borehole flowmeter. Location of
                                borehole shown on figure 3.

-------
 pairs of data were used to calculate each point on the variogram. A vertical correlation
 scale of about 0.8 meters is calculated from this variogram by fitting a negative-exponential
 model to the variogram data. Values of vertical correlation scale, obtained by this method
 to  date (March 1988), range from 0.2 to 1  meter, with a mean of about 0.3 meters.
 Preliminary vertical correlation scales  determined from the permeameter data are of a
 comparable magnitude.
    The variogram analysis method can be expanded to a three-dimensional analysis of the
 results  from many boreholes and  can be used to estimate correlation scales in three
 directions. A preliminary analysis of a limited number of hydraulic-conductivity data from
 the flowmeter tests and permeameter tests of cores suggests a horizontal correlation scale
 of  several meters.  The  three principle  correlation scales  are needed, along with the
 variance of the natural logarithm of hydraulic conductivity, to apply the stochastic theories
 which relate macrodispersion to the statistical properties of the hydraulic-conductivity
 distribution (Gelhar and Axness, 1983; Dagan, 1984; Neuman, 1987).
    8. OTHER TECHNIQUES FOR DETERMINING HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY

    A study is underway to correlate profiles of hydraulic conductivity, as measured using
the flowmeter technique, with other geophysical logs taken in the same boreholes. Figure 7
shows a hydraulic-conductivity profile and a natural-gamma log from the same borehole.
Both profiles exhibit a decreasing trend with depth.   The gamma log records natural-
gamma emission from aquifer minerals, especially potassium-containing clays and feldspar.
The apparent correlation between gamma counts and hydraulic conductivity may be due to
a relationship between mineral composition and grain size.   The use of gamma logs in
conjunction with neutron  logs,  which  are an indirect  measure  of porosity,  is  being
investigated to determine if these logs can be used to determine the hydraulic-conductivity
distribution indirectly.
    Although this correlation approach may be site specific, transferable only to  other
aquifers of similar composition and structure, the use of natural gamma and neutron logs to
infer  the  hydraulic-conductivity distribution has advantages.   The geophysical logging
techniques are widely used and the borehole can be a standard monitoring well. Standard
logging techniques also do not require pumping  of the  wells.   Because the flowmeter
                                        19

-------
method requires constant pumping of the well, it may not be feasible for use at highly
contaminated sites because of the problem with disposal of the discharge.
    Another method used to determine aquifer hydraulic conductivity at the Cape Cod site
is  the  slug  or piezometer test.  Standard piezometer tests  were performed in several
monitoring wells at the test site.  A profile of horizontal hydraulic conductivity resulting
from tests in a cluster of six 5-cm-diameter wells, each screened at a different depth over a
0.6-meter interval, is shown in figure 9. The test is performed by instantaneously dropping
the water level in the well and then recording the subsequent rise back to the static level.
Because of the high permeability of the aquifer, this recovery occurs rapidly, and a highly
sensitive pressure  transducer and fast recording data logger must be used to measure it.
The analysis method  of Bouwer and Rice  (1976) was used to calculate the average
hydraulic conductivity over the screened interval of aquifer from this recovery response.
    Plans were  drawn for a packer  system which  could be used to  perform similar
piezometer tests in long-screened wells, such as those installed for the flowmeter tests. The
tests may be run on short sections of the screen (0.15 meters) which are  isolated with the
packers. By repeating the packer-piezometer test along the length of the screen, a profile
of hydraulic conductivity with the same resolution as that from the flowmeter test could be
obtained.
    To investigate the relation between the  variability in  hydraulic conductivity and the
sedimentary structure of the aquifer, two methods were used to define the structure  of the
outwash deposit:  ground-penetrating radar and geologic logging of trench exposures.  In
January 1987, several ground-penetrating radar lines were run across  the study site.  As
shown in figure 10, broken horizontal reflectors were recorded by the radar in the northern
end of the site and a large bowl-shaped structure was recorded in the  southern end. The
locations of these  two lines are indicated on figure 3.  All coring and flowmeter tests were
conducted in the northern end of the site in the area of broken horizontal  reflectors.  These
reflectors may indicate a gross horizontal bedding structure, and the length of the reflectors
may correlate with the horizontal length of sedimentary structures,  such as the length of
interfingering gravel lenses.
    In November 1987, two intersecting trenches were dug at the site so that a  three-
dimensional description of the sedimentary structure could be obtained (Byron Stone, U.S.
Geological  Survey, oral commun., 1987). The east-west and north-south oriented trenches
were 20 meters and 15 meters long, respectively, and 2 meters deep.  Sedimentary troughs,
                                         20

-------
                   10
ETERS


«fl
2
z

_r





C/)
UI

o
00
               UI
               a
                  -10
                  -15
                                           | 0.080
                                          ^\ 0.088
                                    ^•
                                  K..0.032
                                      ••-..
                                          "
                                                       -J0.27
                                          r'o.G74
                                           •
                                            i
                                            •
                                                I 0.13
                       I SCREENED INTERVAL
                    0.01                      0.1                        1

                     HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY, IN CENTIMETERS PER SECOND
Figure 9.    Vertical profile of horizontal hydraulic conductivity measured in sk wells in cluster

            F347 using piezometer method. Location of well cluster shown on figure 3.
                                              21

-------
N     Line  1
                                                                             LINE 2

                      Line 2
LINE 1
                                                                                                     w
                                                                                                      Water table
                                                                                                        APPROXIMATELY
                                                                                                        6 METERS BELOW
                                                                                                        LAND SURFACE
                                                                 \
                                                     APPROXIMATELY
                                                      15 METERS

                   Figure 10  Ground-penetrating radar images from study site, no, corrected for variations in land

                              surface altitude or horizontal distance. Location of lines shown m figure 3.

-------
 1- to 2-meters wide, were exposed in the east-west trench, suggesting a braided-stream
 depositional environment.  These troughs  displayed a tabular form in the north-south
 trench  and  extended several meters  in  length.   The  shapes of  troughs  and  other
 sedimentary structures observed in the trenches  indicate  that the source of this braided
 stream deposit was  the moraine to the north. Detailed  photographs of exposed trench
 faces were taken for further analysis.  Short horizontal cores were taken from the trench
 walls for hydraulic conductivity and grain-size analyses.
    To aid in calibration of ground-penetrating-radar records, several additional lines were
 run over the area prior to trenching.  The gain was set on these radar runs to maximize the
 detail in the upper 3 meters of the outwash so that the records could be later correlated
 with the sedimentary structures exposed in the trenches.
                                   9. SUMMARY

    This  report  summarizes  the  progress  of a project to investigate the  small-scale
variability of  hydraulic conductivity  in a  sand  and  gravel  aquifer  on  Cape  Cod,
Massachusetts. This study is part of interdisciplinary research being conducted at the Cape
Cod site  under the USGS Toxic Waste Ground-Water Contamination Program.   The
overall objective  of this program is to  understand the processes controlling the transport
and fate of contaminants in the subsurface.
    Two primary methods to measure small-scale variations in hydraulic  conductivity,
permeameter analysis of cores and in-situ impeller flowmeter tests, have been applied and
refined at the site. Significant effort was spent early in the study developing methods to
obtain representative samples of the noncohesive, unconsolidated aquifer sediments. A
total of 95 meters of core was obtained from 16 boreholes,  and the hydraulic conductivity
of the  cores was measured using a multiple-port permeameter. Long-screened wells were
installed  at  19  locations for impeller flowmeter tests. To date (March 1988), about 600
permeameter and 1000 flowmeter measurements of hydraulic conductivity  have  been
made.  Both methods yield detailed profiles of hydraulic conductivity with depth.
    Secondary  methods which were investigated  include correlation of geophysical logs
with hydraulic conductivity, piezometer  tests in monitoring wells, ground-penetrating radar,
and analysis of stratigraphy exposed in surface trenches.
                                        23

-------
    The extensive data base  that  is being assembled will  be used  to determine the
statistical  properties  of  the  three-dimensional   hydraulic-conductivity   distribution.
Preliminary variogram analyses of the data suggest that the vertical correlation scale is less
than 1 meter and the horizontal correlation scales are several meters. From the statistical
properties-variance  and  correlation scales-dispersivity can be  calculated using the
stochastic theories of Gelhar and Axness (1983) and others, which relate macrodispersion
to the hydraulic-conductivity distribution. Because dispersivity values have already been
measured in this aquifer through a large-scale natural-gradient tracer test (Garabedian and
others, 1987), the application of these stochastic theories to field situations can be tested.
                                          24

-------
                               REFERENCES CITED

Anderson, M. P., 1979, Using models to simulate the movement of contaminants through
    groundwater flow systems: CRC Critical Reviews in Environmental Control, v. 9, p.
    97-156.
Anderson, M. P., 1987, Field studies in groundwater hydrology--A new era: U.S. National
    Report to International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics, Reviews of Geophysics, v.
    25, no. 2, p. 141-147.
Boggs, J. M., Young, S. C., Hopkins, R. A., and Chung, Y. C, in preparation, Interim
    hydrogeologic characterization of the macrodispersion experiment site: Topical
    Report, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, Calif.
Bouwer, Herman, and Rice, R. C., 1976, A slug test for determining hydraulic conductivity
    of unconfined aquifers with completely or partially penetrating wells: Water Resources
    Research, v. 12, no. 3, p. 423-428.
Dagan, Gideon, 1984, Solute transport in heterogeneous porous formations:  Journal of
    Fluid Mechanics, v. 145, p. 151-177.
Garabedian, S. P., LeBlanc, D. R., Hess, K. M., and Quadri, R. D., 1987, Natural-gradient
    tracer test in sand and gravel: Results of spatial moments analysis, in Franks, B. J., ed.,
    U.S. Geological Survey Program on Toxic Waste-Ground-Water Contamination:
    Proceedings of the third technical meeting, Pensacola, Florida, March 23-27,1987,
    Chapter B:  U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 87-109, p. B13-B16.
Garabedian, S. P., 1987, Large-scale dispersive transport in aquifers.  Field scale
    experiments and reactive transport theory: Massachusetts Institute of Technology,
    Dept. of Civil Engineering, unpublished Ph.D. thesis, 290 p.
Gelhar, L. W., and Axness, C. L., 1983, Three-dimensional stochastic analysis of
    macrodispersion in aquifers: Water Resources Research, v. 19, no. 1, p. 161-180.
                                       25

-------
Hess, K. M., Wolf, S. H., LeBlanc, D. R., Garabedian, S. P., and Celia, M. A., 1987,
    Natural-gradient tracer test in sand and gravel: Preliminary results of laboratory and
    field measurements of hydraulic conductivityvin Franks, B. J., ed., U.S. Geological
    Survey Program on Toxic Waste-Ground-Water Contamination: Proceedings of the
    third technical meeting, Pensacola, Florida, March 23-27,1987, Chapter B: U.S.
    Geological Survey Open-File Report 87-109, p. B25-B26.
Hufschmied, Peter, 1986, Estimates of three-dimensional statistically anisotropic hydraulic
    conductivity field by means of single well pumping tests combined with flowmeter
    measurements:  Hydrogeologie, v. 2, p. 163-174.
LeBlanc, D. R., 1984, Sewage plume in a sand and gravel aquifer, Cape Cod,
    Massachusetts:  U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 2218,28 p.
Morin, R. H., LeBlanc, D.  R., and Teasdale, W. E., 1988, A statistical evaluation of
    formation disturbance produced by well-casing installation methods:  Ground Water, v.
    26, no. 2, p. 207-217.
Olea, R. A., 1975, Optimal mapping techniques using regionalized variable theory:
    Lawrence, Kansas, Kansas Geological Survey, 137 p.
Neuman, S. P., Winter, C. L., and Newman, C. M., 1987, Stochastic theory of field-scale
    fickian dispersion in anisotropic porous media: Water Resources Research, v. 23, no.
    3, p. 453-466.
Rad, N. S., and Clough, G. W., 1984, New procedure for saturating sand specimens:
    Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, v. 110, no. 9, p. 1205-1218.
Rehfeldt,  K. R., Hufschmied, P., Gelhar, L. W., and Schaefer, M. E, 1989, Measuring
    hydraulic conductivity with the borehole flowmeter: Topical Report EN-6511, Electric
    Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, Calif.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1982, Cape Cod determination: Federal Register,
    v. 47,  no. 134, p. 30282-30284.
Zapico, M. M., Vales, S., and Cherry,  J. A, 1987, A wireline piston core barrel for sampling
    cohesionless sand and gravel below the water table: Ground Water Monitoring
    Review, v. 7, no. 3, p. 74-82.
                                         _ ,      -trV.a. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1991 - 548-187/20573
                                         20

-------