EPA/540/2-89/051
     SUPERFUNDTREATABILITY
           CLEARINGHOUSE
              Document Reference:
IT Corporation. "Laboratory Feasibility Testing of Prototype Soil Washing Concepts.'
        Prepared for U.S. EPA, OHMSB. 47 pp. December 1983.
             EPA LIBRARY NUMBER:

          Super-fund Treatability Clearinghouse - FRET

-------
                SUPERFUND TREATABILITT CLEARINGHOUSE ABSTRACT
Treatment Process:

Media:

Document Reference:



Document Type:

Contact:
Site Name:
Location of Test:
Physical/Chemical - Soil Washing

Soil/Sandy

IT Corporation. "Laboratory Feasibility Testing of
Prototype Soil Washing Concepts."  Prepared for
U.S. EPA, OHMSB.  47 pp.  December 1983.

EPA ORD Report

Franklin Freestone
U.S. EPA, ORD
HWERL - Releases Control Branch
Woodbridge Avenue
Edison, NJ  08837-3579
201-340-6630

Clarksburg Soil
OHMSETT, Leonardo, NJ (Non-NPL)

Knoxville, TN
BACKGROUND;  This draft document reports on laboratory testing of several
washing solutions to decontaminate soils contaminated vith dioxins.  The
following extractants were evaluated;  surfactant mixtures of 0.5% to 3%
Adsee 799 and  0.5* to 3% Hyonic NP90 in distilled water,  Freon TF with
and without methanol, and kerosene/diesel fuel-water mixtures.  A spiked
soil was used for the study.
OPERATIONAL INFORMATION;  One kilogram of soil was spiked with a solution
of TCDD and isooctane.  TCDD concentrations were measured using a Soxhlet
extraction procedure.  The average starting concentration was 0.671 ug
TCDD/g soil with a relative standard deviation of 3.78%.   The spiked soil
was placed into a centrifuge tube,  and the solvent to be tested was added
at a 3 to 1 ratio of solvent to soil (weight percent).  The centrifuge tube
was then sealed and placed in the reciprocating shaker for 4 hours at low
speed.  After shaking,  the tube was placed in a centrifuge for ten minutes
at 2000 rfi.  The clear supernatant was decanted and the residue in the
tube veij&pd*  A quantity of solvent equal to the first extract was added
to the tute and the procedure repeated until three solvent extractions and
a water v**h (where appropriate) were completed.  The supernatant and the
residual foil were extracted and analyzed for TCDD,  and a material balance
was calculated for the experiment.  No analytical QA/QC procedures are
described.
PERFORMANCEt  The extraction efficiency was measured by Soxhlet extraction
of the soil residue after it had undergone three simple batch extractions
with a specific solvent system.  The study summarizes the data for each of
the soil washing solutions.  The overall material balance for the extract
systems ranged from 94% to 117% with a mean of 101.7% and a relative
standard deviation of 6.6%.
3/89-44                                              Document Number:  FRET

   NOTE:  Quality assurance of data »ay not be appropriate for all uses.

-------
     The test results indicated that the Freon and Freon/methanol
extraction systems were the most effective extractants for the removal of
TCDD from the soil.  After three batch extractions, 7.4% (50 ppb) and 2.9%
(20 ppb), respectively, of TCDD remained on the soil.  The overall material
balances for these extractions were 101.2% and 96.3%, respectively.
    Increasing the concentration of the extractant decreased the residual
TCDD concentrations significantly.  For example,  the residual concentra-
tion of TCDD decreased from 27.2% to 13.2% as the concentration of the
Adsee/Hyonic increased from 0.5%/0.5% to 3%/3%.
    Other variables which may impact the extraction efficiency include the
organic content and the soil moisture content of the soils.  The organic
content of the soil will affect the amount of organics that the soil will
absorb, and the ability to desorb these organics.  The soil used in this
test contained 0.2% organic matter.  The moisture content of the soil will
significantly affect the final process design for extractants  such as
methanol which are non-aqueous and have a limited capacity to absorb
water.

CONTAMINANTS:

Analytical data is provided in the treatability study report.  The
breakdown of the contaminants by treatability group is:

Treatability Group             CAS Number       Contaminants

W02-Dioxins, Furans, and       1746-01-6        2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-
     and PCBs                                    p-dioxin (TCDD)
3/89-44                                              Document Number:  FRET

   NOTE:  Quality assurance of data may not be appropriate for all uses.

-------
                                                           
-------
                                 IT ENVIROSCIENCE
  IT CORPORATION

                                 DRAFT

                      LABORATORY FEASIBILITY TESTING OF
                       PROTOTYPE SOIL  WASHING CONCEPTS
                              Prepared for the
                               USEPA - OHMSB
                     Richard  P. Traver, Technical Advisor
                                    by:

                               E. S. Alperin
                               IT Corporation
                             312 Director's Drive
                             Knoxville, TN 37923
                               December  1983
0141-EA
                          Division ol IT Corporation
         IT Enviroscience -312 Directors Drive • Knoxville. Tennessee 37923 -615-690-321

-------
                                    CONTENTS

                                                                     Page

I.     INTRODUCTION                                                    1

II.    CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS                                 2

III.   EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE                                          4

       A.  Stock Solution Preparation                                  4
       B.  13Ci2 TCDD Spiking Solution Preparation                     4
       C.  Soli  Spiking Procedures                                     4
       D.  Typical  Extraction Procedure                                5

IV.    EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS AND DISCUSSION                             7



                                   APPENDICES


       A.  SOXHLET  EXTRACTION PROCEDURE
           TCDD  SAMPLE CLEAN-UP PROCEDURES

       B.  TCOD  INSTRUMENT PROCEDURE

       C.  CAT TANK SOIL CHARACTERIZATIOK

       D.  SURFACTANT PRODUCT DATA SHEETS
           FREON TF PRODUCT DATA SHEET

-------
                             I.  INTRODUCTION

 One  of  the objectives of the OHMS Branch of the EPA is to develop a mobile^pro-
 cess whereby excavated soils can be cleaned sufficiently to make the soil
 suitable for redeposition.  A contract was issued to Rexnord to develop and
 construct mobile soil washers.  As part of that contract (68-03-2696) Rexnord
 did  limited laboratory developnent on the decontamination of soils by con- »
 tacting (washing) thorn with aqueous fluids. »The-laboratory work led to the «
 design and construction of two prototype mobile treating units. *

 During the construction of this equipment, it became apparent that cleanup of
 solids or stodges contaminated with toxic, politically sensitive compounds such*
 as 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-d1ox1n (TCDO) er polychlorinated biphenyls
 (PCS) 1s a major potential application for this type of equipment.  Recent
 discoveries of TCDO contamination 1 n*W9H9H& have heightened interest in
 developing techniques for dealing with these compounds.

 This Laboratory Feasibility Testing Program was undertaken at the request of
 the  EPA to evaluate the soil washer concept for removing TCDD from contaminated
 soils.  The work was limited to the use of relatively nontoxic, non-hazardous,
 and  non-flammable extractant system.  The extractants evaluated under the work
 plan were:  surfactant mixtures of 1/2% to 3t«M«ee 799»(see Appendix D) and
 1/2% to 3% Hyonlc NP90»(see Appendix 0) 1n distilled watco, Free** Tf* (see
 Appendix D) with and without methancA, and kerosene/d1 esel fuel-water mix-
 tures*  All extracttnts were compared using three successive batch extractions
with fresh extractant and a water wash (where appropriate^ followed by a Soxn*
 let extraction of the residue to measure residua* c«*a*1nant concentration*
and for material balance calculations*

-------
                                          -2-

                         II.   CONCLUSIONS  AND  RECOMMENDATIONS

      The experimental  results from this preliminary  investigation  into  the  extrac-
      tion of TCDD from "Cat  tank"  (see Appendix  C) soil  (spiked  with  671  ppb TCDD)
      show that  75 to 85% of  the TCDD  can  be recovered  by  three simple batch extrac-
      tions with a surfactant solution containing equal  volumes of  Adsee 799 with
      NP90, each at V2 to 3%  1n deionlzed  water followed by a  water wash.  The  data
      also show  that greater  than 90%  of the TCDD can be extracted  from  the  soil
      using a Freon solvent system.  The extractant system of  kerosene/water 1:4 v/v
      (20% kerosene/80% H20)  removed about 80% of the TCDD from the soil and the
      toluene/IPA (4:1  v/v) system  recovered approximately 85% of the  TCDD from the
      soil.
     <>
      This  preliminary  work should  be  expanded to include  the  investigation  of
      several  variables  which could affect the recovery of TCDD from soils under
      actual  field  conditions.   The variables  to  be Investigated  are:

1.    Organic  Content of the  So1t - The "Cat tank" soil  which  the EPA  supplied  for
      use   in  the preliminary experiments  had  an  organic content  of 0.12%  as reported
      in the  "Chemical Countermeasures  for In-s1tu Treatment of Hazardous  Material
      Releases"  report.   The  organic content of soils varies from less than  0.2% as*
      in the  "Cat tank"  soil  to  approximately  MH found in peaty  top soils.  Experts
      in soil  chemistry  predict  that the organic  content of the soil will  have  »
     direct effect on the Mount of organlcs  that the  soil will  adsorb  and  the ajbi-
      I1ty to desorb these
2.   M1x1n§. - The laboratory feasibility testing was performed using  batch  extrac-
     tions on a reciprocating shaker table for 4 nr per extraction*   The  scope  of
     this work did not Include studying the effect of mixing  Intensity  or duration
     on the kinetics of the extraction.

3.   Soil Moisture Content • The moisture content of the soil will significantly
     affect the final process design for e«t«actant* which are non-aqueou* and  have
     a limited capacity to absorb watet.  For the surfactant  systems  the  moisture
     content  of the soils will  serve as a diluent for the Initial  surfactant  con-
     centration.  For the Freon system adequate methanol will be  required to  absorb
     moisture and promote good soil /Freon contact.

-------
4.   Initial TCOO Concentration - The Initial experiments were conducted using "Cat
     tank" soil spiked with 671 ppb native TCDO.  Lower Initial  concentrations of
     TCDO should be evaluated for their effect on the extraction efficiency of the
     solvent systems.

5.   Organic Contaminants on the Soil*- The effect of other organic contaminants on
     the soil and their competition or Interference with the ability of the extrac-
     tant system to recover the dioxin should be Investigated.

6.   W«»t*«r4*g Eff«ct~- The preliminary laboratory feasibility  testing program was
     completed 1n the course of 6 months from Initial spiking of the soil  to analy-
     sis of the final  samples. ^w^orrg--terw Vf«ct. of co»Uct  with tfee soil *nd»
              to sunlight and th* elements on the «xtracti«r «ff1«t«wcy*«f th«*
             ^yst«K should be investigated by using actual samples of soil from
     contaminated sites 1n Missouri.

-------
                                         -4-
                           III.  EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

 A.    STOCK  SOLUTION PREPARATION
      Native 2,3,7,8 tetrachlorod1benzo-p-d1ox1n {TCDD) Lot #TD-199 was purchased
      from Kor  Isotopes  (Cambridge, Massachusetts).  The TCOO was received 1n sealed
      vials containing 1 mg TCDO/1.1 mL of anlsole.  A 40 ppm stock solution of TCDO
      was prepared by quantitatively transferring the contents of two vials and rin-
      ses to a  50 mL volumetric flask and diluting with Isooctane to volume.

 B.    13Ci2 TCOD SPIKING SOLUTION PREPARATION
      13Ci2 TCDO - Lot No. AWN-1203-65 - was received 1n a sealed vial containing
      50 ug TCDD 1n 1.2 mL of 1soctane from Cambridge Isotope Laboratories
      (Cambridge, Massachusetts).  The ampule was allowed to come to equilibrium and
     lightly sonicated before being opened.  The solution was quantitatively trans-
     fered with multiple rinses of Isooctane to a 50 mL volumetric flask and made up
     to volume with Isooctane.  The solution obtained was 1 ug/mL 13Ci£  TCDD.
     Samples were spiked using 100 uL or 50 uL (100 ng and 50 ng respectively) of
     this stock solution before cleanup (see Appendix A).

C.   SOIL SPIKING PROCEDURE
     One kilogram of Clarksburg soil  (obtained from Mason & Hanger - Silas Mason
     Co., Inc., EPA - OHMSETT Facility, Leonardo, New Jersey) was placed In a 2 L
     round bottom flask.  Added to the flask were 700 mL of pesticide grade methy-
     lene chloride and 15 mL of the 40 ppm native TCDD spiking solution.  The 2 L
     flask containing soil, methylene chloride, and TCDO spiking solution was placed
     on a Buchl rotary evaporator (Buchler Instrument Company) and agitated at room
     temperature for 16  hours.  Vacuum was then applied to the system to remove the
     methylene chloride.  When no more methylene chloride was being removed at room
     temperature,  the system was heated to 50°C with a water bath and held under
     vacuum  for 4 hours.  The dry spiked soil  was then removed from the flask and
     placed  1n a 1 gallon wide-mouth  sample container.  This entire procedure was
     repeated  using another kilogram  of Clarksburg soil.  Upon completion of the
     second  batch  of  soil  the two samples were composited In a jar roller at 30 rpm
     for  16  hours.   Four allquots of  the spiked composited soil were removed from
     the  sample container and analyzed by Soxhlet extraction for TCDD to ensure the
     uniformity of  the spiking procedure.  The results of this analysis are pre-

-------
                                         -b-

     sented in Table 1.  These data indicate an average starting  concentration  of
     0.671 wg TCDO/g soil  with a relative standard deviation of  3.78%.   This  value
     will be used as the starting concentration of TCOO on the soil  to  calculate all
     results using this batch of spiked Clarksburg soil.

D.   TYPICAL EXTRACTION PROCEDURE
     The typical  extraction procedure was to place^Wfltu of spiked  soil  into a
     tared 50 mL centrifuge tube (with screw cap^.  The appropriate  solvent at  a
     «««*M*tt*/w solvent te*e*l  ratio was added to the centrifuge tube  which  was
     then sealed  and placed in a horizontal  position on the reciprocating shaker
     table for 4*Hours at  lew speed4iM cycles/«1n at * in-ae*Utu4e).   After
     shaking,  the tube was placed in  a centrifuge f or ~tt
-------
                       -6-
Table 1.  Soxhlet Extraction of Spiked Soil
Sample
1
2
3
4



Spiked Sample
Wt (q)
1.984
2.010
1.947
1.961
7.902
Level of
5.30
13C12TCDD
Added (nq)
100
100
100
100

Native TCOO Spike orH
H9 TCO° = n fi71,,n TPI
13C12TCDO
% Recovered
71.7
45.5
54.5
84.9

» 1 WJcSBWB0'"80;TT '
in/n «nil
Native TCDD
Recovered (yg)
1.306
1.394
1.276
1.324
5.30
»

     7.902g soil
     Relative Standard Deviation 3.78%

-------
                                     -7-

                  IV.  EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

 The data presented In Table 2 are a summary of the experimental.results for the
 Soil Washer Laboratory Feasibility Study.  These data show that Freon and
 Freon/methanol are the most effective extractants for the removal  of TCDD from
 Clarksburg soil.  The extraction efficiency was measured by Soxhlet extraction
 of the soil residue after 1t had undergone three simple batch extractions with
 a specific solvent system.  In the case of Freon and Freon/methanol extractant
 systems 7.4% and 2.9% respectively of the Initially spiked TCDO remained on the
 soil after three batch extractions (corresponding to 50 ppb and 20 ppb respec-
 tively on the soil).   The overall material balances for these extractants were
 101.2% and 96.3% respectively.  The data 1n Table 3 show the specific details
 of each stage for each extractant system Including sample weight,  nanograms of
 13Ci2 added,  nanograms of 13Ci2 recovered, mlcrograras of native TCOD recovered
 and mlcrograms of native TCDD recovered corrected for l3Ci2  recovery.  The
 mlcrograms of native  TCDD recovered corrected are compared with the starting
 concentration of 0.671 ug TCDD/g soil  to calculate the % native TCDD recovered
 from the soil  for each stage.  The sum of the recoveries for each  stage of
 extraction plus the recovery from the Soxhlet extraction of the residue give
 the overall material  balance for the experiment.  The data In Table 2 show that
 the overall material  balance for the extractant systems ranged from 94 to 117%
 with  a  mean of 101.7% and a  relative standard deviation of 6.6%.

 The data  1n Table 4 show the effect of surfactant concentrations  on the ability
 to  extract the TCDD from the soil.   It can be seen that with the  1/2% Adsee 799
 and  1/2%  Hyonlc NP90  the third stage of the extract contains -22%  of the Ini-
 tial TCDD.  With  the  2%/2% mixture  and the 3%/3% mixture the third extracts
 contain 6.1% and  5.8% of  the Initial  TCDD respectively.  It should also be
 noted that with Increasing concentration of surfactant the residual TCDO on the
 soil decreased  from 27.2% with the  l/2%/l/2% mixture to 13.2% with the 3%/3%
mixture.

The data 1n Table 5 are  results  of  Soxhlet extractions of the unsplked
Clarksburg soil as  received  at the  IT  Technology Development Laboratory.  These
data show that  native  dloxln was  undetected 1n the virgin soil.  The detectable

-------
Table 2.  Soil Washer Laboratory Feasibility Study Experimental  Summary
       Starting Concentration of Native TCDD on Soil  is 671  ng/g


Toluene/lPA
4:1 v/v


Freon

Freon/HeOH
4:1 v/v
Diesel Fuel/
H20
4:1 v/v
Kerosene/H^O
1:4 v/v
Hj,0

|S NP 90
IS Adsee 799


21 NP90
21 Adsee 799
3S NP 90
31 Adsee 799

JjjS
N *f
» !
2. 2
* 3
1 «
A" 1
*=> 2
7 1
? 2
1 1
i'o 2

'I 1
'2-2
'3l
.42
tf 1
1^ 2
<7 3
if 4
'1 1
^o 2
fy 3
21.4
1 u2

J
as
89
75.9
78.1
76.6
76.2
76.5
81.2
64.5
60.0

52.9
46.1
0.05
0.06
18.4
45.2
32.4
35.0
60.5
51.1
55
54
57.0
57.3

Stage 1


* *"5* .V <&
<"^ ^r *< >c» <* «, *V£ «» A
*$* 
-------
Table 3. Soilwasher Stuoy 9713.
Sample
No.
367-54-1
367-54-2
367-54-3
367-54-4
367-48-0
367-48-1
367-48-2
367-75-1
367-75-2
1 367-58-1
2, 367-58-2
"3 367-96-1
A 367-96-2
•3 367-96-3
^ 367-96-4
3 367-96-5
2L. 367-96-6
J 367-98-1
^ 367-98-2
1 367-85-1
•0 367-85-2
l< 367-93-1
It. 367-93-2
'I 367-97-1
»u 367-97-2
11 367-97-3
H- 367-97-4
M 367-99-1
,V- 367-99-2
Solvent
System
Toluene
Toluene
Toluene
Toluene
Toluene
Toluene
Toluene
Toluene
Toluene
Tol/lPA
4:1 v/v
To V/ 1 PA
4:1 v/v
Tol/lPA
4.1 v/v
Tol/IPA
4:1 v/v
Tol/lPA
4:1 v/v
Diesel /H-0
1:4 v/v '
Ker/H20
1:4 v/v
Ker/HoO
1:4 v/v
Ker/HoO
1:4 v/v
Ker/HzO
1:4 v/v
Extract* Sample 13Ci? TCOO
No. wt (g) Added (nq)
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
S
1
1
1
1
2
2
3
3
5
5
1
1
1
1
2
a
3
3
5
5
1.984
2.010
1.947
1.961
10.16
10.18
10.0
10.5
1.9924
1.9917
8.33
8.33
8.33
8.33
8.33
8.33
8.33
8.33
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
100
100
100
100
50
50
50
100
100
100
100
50
SO
50
50
50
50
50
SO
SO
SO
SO
50
50
SO
50
SO
50
SO
13Ci2 TCOO
Recovered (nq)
71.7
45.5
54.4
84.9
38.5
37.0
36.3
69.3
72.1
77.7
84.7
38.1
35.0
35.8
35.0
33.8
37.6
41.1
35.9
7.83
5.08
23.9
6.7
12.3
18.6
14.5
25.0
18.2
NA
X13Ci2 TCDD
Recovered
71.7
45.5
54.4
84.9
77
74.0
72.7
69.3
72.1
77.7
84.7
76.2
70.0
71.6
70.0
67.6
75.2
82.2
71.8
15.7
10.2
47.8
13.4
24.6
37.2
28.9
50.0
36.4
NA
03 Shaker Extraction Data
Native TCDD Native TCDD XNatlve TCDOb
Recovered (ug) Recovered Corrected fua) Recovered From Soil
0.937
0.634
0.695
1.124
NO
NO
NO
0.677
0.718
0.884
1.008
3.233
3.056
0.436
0.430
0.0597
0.0654
0.57
0.491
0.680
0.410
1.698
0.4143
0.235
0.229
0.102
0.147
0.524
NA
1.306
1.394
1.276
1.324

0.977
0.996
1.137
1.190
4.243
4.366
0.609
0.614
0.0883
0.0870
0.693
0.684
4.33
4.03
3.55
3.092
0.954
0.616
0.356
0.294
1.44
NA

**



85.0
89! 0
75 9X
78.' IX
10 9X
11. OX
1.6X
1.6X
12.41
13.31
64.5
60.0
52.9
46.1
14.2
9.2
5.3
4.4
21.5
NA
 Extract 1 « Solvent    Extract 2 « Solvent   Extract 3 - Solvent   Extract 4
bbased on starting concentration of 0.671|ig 2,3.7,8-TCOD/grara soil.   .
NA - Not analyzed (Sample not available for analysis).
NO - Not detected.
•• - Used to establish startlnq concentration.
Water Wash   Extract 5 - Soxhlet of Residue

-------
                                                      Table 3.    u~«itinued)
Sample
No.
Ij 367-60-1
i^ 367-60-2
^ 367-65-3
'k> 367-65-4
if 367-78-1
It 367-78-2
*- 367-67-3
//• :;7-67-4
'^367-70-3
'« 367-70-4
- 367-72-3
l» 367-72-4
£ 367-74-3
 367-74-4
'7 367-44-1
2-o 367-44-2
^ 367-65-1
^4-367-65-2
11 367-44-3
-U> 367-44-4
^ 367-67-1
1*1, 367-67-2
1 367-62-1
^ 367-62-2
U 367-72-1
2,1*367-72-2
^ 367-74-1
^l, 367-74-2
Solvent
System
II20

IX/|»d
IX/IX
IX/IX
IX/IX
IX/IX
IX/IX
IX/IX
IX/IX
IX/IX
IX/IX
IX/IX
IX/IX
2X/2XC
2X/2X
2X/2X
2X/2X
2X/2X
2X/2X
2X/2X
2X/2X
2X/2X
2X/2X
2X/2X
21/21
2X/2X
2X/2X
2X/2X
2X/2X
2X/2X
2X/2X
Extract
No.



2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
5
5
3 Sample '
wt (g) t
9.92
9.91
8.91
10.77
3.8
3.8
8.91
10.77
8.91
10.77
8.91
10.77
8.91
10.77
9.22
9.14
8.98
9.55
9.22
9.14
8.98
9.55
9.22
9.14
8.98
9.55
9.22
9.14
8.98
9.55
8.98
9.55
3Ci? TCOO
idded (nq)
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
13Ci2 TCOD %
Recovered (ng)
45.3
44.4
28.0
30.0
14.0
17.2
41.2
39.4
26 (15.6)*
26.1
29.3
29.0
25.7
34.9
13.1
46.0
43.2
38.0
41.0
50.6
37.2
41.8
36.0
31.0
38.7
38.9
36.1
40.8
46.8
36.3
27.2
30.7
C]2 TCDD
lecovered
90.6
88.8
56.0
60.0
28.0
34.4
82.3
78.8
52
52.2
58.6
58.0
51.4
69.8
26.2
92.0
86.4
1 76
82.0
101
74.4
83.6
72
62
77.4
77.8
72.2
81.6
93.6
72.6
54.4
61.4
Native TCDD
Recovered fug)
0.0033
0.0036
1.51
0.799
0.231
0.307
1.26
1.39
0.812
0.682
0.067
0.097
0.848
1.353
0.982
2.89
2.87
2.63
1.03
1.21
1.12
1.10
0.218
0.288
0.325
0.263
0.12K
0.135
0.101
0.0823
0.724
0.791
Native TCOO
Recovered Corrected (uQ
0.003f
0.0040
2.70
1.33
0.825
0.892
1.53
1.76
1.56
1.31
0.114
0.167
1.65
1.94
3.75
3.14
3.32
3.46
1.25
1.20
1.51
1.31
0.30
0.46
0.420
0.338
0.173
0.164
0.108
0.113
1.33
1.29
XNative TCDnb
) Recovered From Soil
0.05
0.06
45.2
18.4
32.4
35.0
25.6
24.?
26.1
18.1
1.9
2.3
27.6
26.8
60.5
51.1
55.0
54.0
20.2
19.6
25.0
HA C
20.5
4.8
7f
.5
7.0
50
.2
2.77
2.65
1.78-
1.75
22.1
20.1
'Extract  1  • Solvent    Extract 2 • Solvent    Extract  3  - Solvent
bBased on storting concentration of 0.671|ig 2,3.7.8-TCDD/gra* soil.
C2l Adsce 799/2X  Hyonlc NP 90.
dU Adsee 799/IX  Hyonic  NP 90.
Extract 4  - Hater Wash     Extract 5 « Soxhlet of Residue

-------
                                                     Table  3.    (Continued)

*a
iXj
?-*>
11
£
l*>
'^]
^
•Wj
/
^
f
if
5
4



Sample
No.
367-78-3
367-78-4
367-91-1

367-91-2
367-91-3

367-B4-4

367-59-3
367-59-4
367-86-1
367-86-2
367-86-3
367-86-4
367-84-5
367-84-6
367-78-5
' 367-78-6
367-88-1
367-88-2
367-88-3
367-88-4

Solvent
System
3X/3X e
3X/3X
3X/3X
3X/3X
3X/3X
3X/3X
3X/3X
3X/3X
3X/3X
3X/3X
Freon
Freon
Freon
Freon
Freon
Freon •
Freon
Freon
Freon/HeOH
4:1 v/v
Freon/HeOH
4:1 v/v
Freon/HeOH
4:1 v/v
Freon/HeOH
4:1 v/v
Extract*
No.
.1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
S
1
1
2
2
3
3
5
5
1
1
2
2
3
3
S
5
Sample
wt (a)
3.8
3.8
3.85
NA
3.8
NA
3.8
NA
3.8
NA
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
3.8
3.8
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
Ci? TCDD
Added (nq)
50
50
50
NA
50
NA
50
NA
100
NA
50
50
50
SO
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
I3Ci2 TCOD
Recovered (nq)
18.5
20.8
16
NA
21.3
NA
14.5
NA
'59
NA
44.8
46.2
46.6
29.5
49.2
47.8
43.9
41.8
37.4
33.6
43.7
44.3
45.3
45.3
30.8
32.9
% Ci2 TCDD
Recovered
37
41.6
32
NA
42.6
NA
29.1
NA
64
. NA
89.7
92.3
93.2
59.0
98.3
96.6
87.9
83.6
74. B
87. 2
07.4
88.6
90.6
90.5
61.6
65.8
Native TCDD
Recovered (i»q)
0.54
0.604
0.167
NA
0.063
NA
0.0091
NA
0.199
NA
4.60
4.72
0.897
0.479
0.272
0.264
0.432
0.426
1.46
1.39
0.766
0.800
0.089
0.093
0.124
0.125
Native TCDD
Recovered Corrected (vq]
1.46
1.452
0.522
NA
0.148
NA
0.0313
NA
0.338
NA
5.13
5.11
0.962
0.811
0.277
0.276
0.491
0.510
1.95
2.07
0.876
0.903
0.098
0.103
0.201
0.190
XNatlve TCDDb
Recovered From Soil
57.3
57.0
20.5
NA
5.8
NA
1.2
NA
13.2
NA
76.6
76.2
14.3
12.1
4.09
4. OB
7.3
7.6
76.5
B1.2
13.0
13.4
1.45
1.51
3.0
2.8
C3I Adsee 799/3Z llyonlc NP 90.

-------
                    Table 4.   Effect  of Surfactant Concentration on TCDD Recovery
                                   Starting Concentration 671 ng/g on Soil





% TCDD Recovered
Surfactant
Concentration
1% + JXa
2% + 2%
3% + 3%
Stage
1
32. 8b
55.2
57.2
Stage
2
25.0
21.3
20.5
Stage
3
22.1
6.1
5.8
Stage
4
2.1
2.2
1.2
Nominal
Residue
Concentration
(ng/g)
121
102
103
% TCDD
Recovered
Stage
5
27.2
21.1
13.2
True
Residue
Concentration
( ng/g )
182
142
89

Total
X TCDD
Recovered
109.1
106
97.9
a% - Adsee 799 + Hyonlc NP 90 1n Delonlzed water.

 All recoveries based on average of available data  points.

-------
     11mlt for those experiments was 0.2 ppb TCOO  on  the  soil.   This  table  also
     Includes a glassware system blank.

     The data in Table 6 show that when 1024 yg of  native TCDO  was  spiked on  virgin
     soil and the soil was extracted by the Soxhlet procedure,  an average of
     986.5 ug of native TCOO was recovered or a 96.3% recovery  of the spike after
     correction for 13Ci2 recovery.
D141-EA-4

-------
Table 6.  Soxhlet Virgin Soil  Spikes
Sample
1
2,

13C12TCDD
Added (nq)
100
100

Native TCDO
Added (nq)
1024
1024

C12TCOO Native TCDD
% Recovered Recovered (nq)
69.3 977
72.1 996
Average 986.5

-------
                          Soxhlet Extraction Procedure

 1.  The Soxhlet apparatus containing a clean glass thimble must be thoroughly
 rinsed with solvent before using.  It must be operated for 2 hours with toluene
 prior to use.

 2.  Transfer a 10-g aliquot of a1r-dr1ed soil directly Into a suitable glass
 container such as a beaker or flask.

 3.  Add 50 uL of a 1.00 ng/uL solution of 13Ci£ Isotoplcally labeled
 2,3,7-8-TCDO directly to the soil.

 4.  If the soil has not been a1r-dr1ed, add 20 g of sol vent-extracted anhydrous
 sodium sulfate and mix thoroughly using a stainless steel spoon or spatula.
 (Extremely wet samples may require prior centrlfugatlon to remove excess water.)
 Allow the mixture to stand under ambient conditions.  Mix again after 2 hours
 and allow to stand for at least 6 additional hours.  Mix again just before
 adding solvent.

 5.  Add 10 g of anhydrous sodium sulfate to the thimble.  Transfer the sample
 (soil  plus sodium sulfate) to the thimble and cover with a layer of clean glass
wool.   Rinse the container with toluene and transfer to the apparatus.

 6.  Introduce 130 wL of pesticide grade toluene Into the extractor and operate
the apparatus for a minimum of 25 cycles (18 to 24 hours).

 7.  The toluene extract Is transferred to a 500-mL round bottom flask followed
by two 20-mL toluene rinses.  Toluene 1s removed by attaching a snyder column to
the round bottom flask and heating with a heating mantle.  Concentrate to
approximately 10 ml.  Then quantitatively transfer the toluene to a 20 ml vial
using  3 X 3 mL MEClg rinses.  Evaporation of toluene 1s continued using filtered
N2 gas.   When the volume 1s reduced to about 200 to 300 uL, an aliquot of 1 ml
of hexane 1s added to the 20 ml vial.  Reduce the volume to 200 to 300 wL with
N? gas.   Repeat the addition of 1 mL of hexane and again reduce to 200 to
300 uL.   This concentrated hexane extract 1s ready for cleanup according to the
procedures 1n the following section.

-------
                          TCOO Sample Clean-up Procedure
 Option A
 1.  Pack a 1 X 10 cm chromatography column with 1.0 g of silica gel* and 4.0 g
 of 40% w/w sulfurlc acid-modified silica gel.  Pack a second chromatography
 column (1 X 30 cm) with 6.0 g of alumina* and a 1-cm layer of sodium sulfate.
 Add hexane to the columns until free of channels or air bubbles.  This can be
 readily achieved using a small positive pressure (5 ps1) of clean nitrogen.

 *S1l1ca gel  (for column chromatography. type 60, EM Reagent, 100 to 200 mesh) and
 alumina (add alumina, AG 4, BIO-RAD Laboratories)  are Soxhlet-extracted with
 CH2C1? for 21 hours and activated at 130°C and 190°C, respectively, before use.
 Each Batch should be tested for proper recovery of  2,3,7,8-TCDO before use.

 2.  Place the hexane extract on top of the silica gel and rinse the culture tube
 with 2 X 0.5 ml of hexane onto the column and elute directly onto the alumina
 column with  45 ml of hexane.  Discard the silica gel.

 3.  Place 20 ml of hexane on the alumina column and elute until the liquid has
 dropped below the sodium sulfate layer.  Discard the eluted hexane.

 4.  Place 20 ml of 20% v/v methylene chlorlde/hexane solution on top of the
 aluminum.  Collect this fraction 1n a 125 ml Erlenmeyer flask.

 5.  The volume of this eluate which contains TCDD 1s reduced by a gentle stream
 of filtered  nitrogen gas.   When the volume 1s down  to about 1 to 2 ml, allquots
 are transferred,  one at a  time, to a 2-mL conical m1n1-v1al for further concen-
 tration until  the entire fraction  1s transferred.  One ml of hexane 1s used to
 r1<«e  the  Erlenmeyer flask and 1s  transferred, 1n portions, to the m1n1-v1al.
 Repeat this  procedure once more.  At no time must the extract be allowed to go
 to dryness.   Finally 500 uL of hexane 1s used to rinse the walls of the mlnl-
 vlal.   The sample 1s stored at this point 1n a freezer until analysis.  Just
 before analysis begins,  the hexane volume 1s reduced to almost dryness and
 Isooctane  (or  other  Cg to  CH hydrocarbon) 1s added to obtain a final  volume of
 50 uL.  This  final addition of Isooctane includes the Internal standard
 37Cl4-2,3,7,8-TCDD.

 Option  B

 1.  Prepare a  glass  macro-column,  20 mm 00 X 230 mm 1n length, tapered to 9 mm
 00  on  one end.  Pack  the column with a plug of sllanlzed glass wool, followed
 successively by 1.0  g  silica  gel,  2.0 g silica gel  containing 33% (w/w) IN NaOH,
 1.0 g  silica gel,  4.0  g  silica gel  containing 44% (w/w)  concentrated H2S04 and
 2.0 g  silica gel.  Add  hexane to the columns until  free of channels or air
 bubbles.  Quantitatively transfer  the concentrated  sample extract to the column
 and elute with 90 ml hexane.   Collect the entire eluate and concentrate to a
 volume of <1 ml 1n a centrifuge tube.

 2.  Construct a chromatography column by packing a  5 ml  disposable plpet (cut
off at the 2.0 ml mark)  with  a plug  of  sllanlzed glass wool  and add 1 g or
activated Woelm basic alumina  (activated at 600° for 24  hours) to the tube.

-------
                   TCDD Sample Clean-up  Procedures  (Continued)



 3.  Quantitatively transfer the concentrated  extract from Step 1 to the top of
 the column using 2 ml hexane.


 4.  Elute the column with 5 ml of  3% methyl ene  chlo£1de-1n-hexane and discard
 the eluate.
                                                  r;

 5.  Elute the column with 20 ml of  50%  methylene cflor1de-1n-hexane and retain
 the entire column eluate for analysis.      -     ^   «„
                                          i      ^1-   -T

 6.  Concentrate the eluate to a volume  <1 ml  and quantitatively transfer 1t to a
 2 ml conical  ra1n1-v1al.


 7.  Further concentrate  the extract In  the  m1n1-v1al t* near dry ness, and store
 the extract at 5°C until $ist before GC/MS  analysis.    .   ^           "
                                                           ~-3F~

 8.  Prior to  GC/MS analysis,  reconstitute the extract by adding Isooctane (or
 other Co to Ci4 hydrocarbon)  and adjusting  the  final volume to 50 uL.  This
 final  add1t1ofcof Isooctane Includes the internal  standard 37Cl4-2,3,7.8-TCOO.
       ____                ~Tf                            <£.   -.,,.
 Option C

 Certaln  very dirty  samples may  require preliminary, cleanup before column
 chronatography.  For those situations, the following-procedure 1s suggested:
                                                    ~~             _    * -3&
 1.  Wash the organ1% extract with 30 ml of 20% aqueous jK>tass1unrt>ydrox1de by
 shaking Tor 10 minutes and then remove, and disetrd the"$qt»eous layer.  -


 2. "iasfc the organic extract with 25 ml of doubly distilled water by shaking for
 2 mlnutH and again remove and discard the aqueous layer.
                                      -^
 3.  CAUTIOUSLY add  50 ml concentrated sulfuMc acid to the organic extract and
 shake ror lu minutes.  Allow the mixture to stand until the aqueous and ouanlc
 layers separate  (approximately 10 minutes) and remove and discard* the aqufwjs
 acw layer.  Repeat add washing until no color is visible In U£ add layer.
       -T                                         IT
4.  Add 25 ml of doubly distilled water to tht organtc extract and shake for
2 minutes, remove and discard the aqueous layer and dry th«-organic lajftr by
adding 10 g of anhydrous sodium sulfate.
5.  Transfer the organic extract to a centrifuge tube and concetiPite to near
dryness by placing the tube In a water bath: at 55°C, wh1le*f>ass1ng a gentle
stream of filtered, prepuMfled N2 over the surface of the extract.

Reconstitute 1n hexane before proceeding with the column chromatography
(Option A or B).                                          .,=



D141-EA-AP-6           *

-------
APPENDIX B


-------
                            TCDD  INSTRUMENT PROCEDURE


 INTRODUCTION
 This 1s a qualitative and  quantitative  (high  resolution) GC/(1ow resolution) MS
 analysis specific for tetrachlorod1benzo-p-d1ox1n using selected 1on monitoring.
 The soil sample extract  1s spiked with  I3c12  2,3,7,8-TCDD before concentration
 and cleanup.   The recovery of  this  Isotoplcally labeled compound corrects for
 the cleanup procedure and  concentration steps.  The final concentrate containing
 the native and Isotoplcally labeled TCDD Is taken to near dryness and brought
 back to a known volume with an Isooctane solution containing a known con-
 centration of  37Cl4.2,3,7.8-TCDD.   This Isotoplcally labeled compound acts as
 an analytical  Instrument Internal standard to correct for small variations 1n
 Injections and Instrument  performance.  Quant1tat1on 1s based on the response of
 the native and "C^  labeled TCDO relative to 37CU-TCDO as the Internal stan-
 dard.   Nominal  detection limit 1s 1 part per  billion based on the original
 sampl e.

 SAFETY

 Samples  generated during the experiments are  handled by qualified personnel
 only.  The experimenter  and the analyst must  be adept at safety procedures and
 have a working knowledge of safety  protocols.  GC/MS Instruments used for dloxln
 analysis must  be equipped  with vapor contamination traps on the capillary split
 and sweep vents  and on the roughing pumps' effluent lines before use.


 INJECTION PROCEDURE - HOT  NEEDLE TECHNIQUE

 The syringe must be thoroughly cleaned between Injections to avoid cross con-
 tamination.  Remove the  plunger between Injections and wipe 1t thoroughly with a
 K1mw1pe.   Rinse  the syringe with ten to fifteen full syringe volumes of hexane
 solvent  wash.  Replace the solvent  wash with  pesticide quality hexane dally.  If
 a  Hamilton  syringe cleaner Is  available that  Is equipped with a vacuum source,
 use this  also.   Do not use the Hamilton syringe cleaner 1f there 1s no vacuum
 pump attached.   Insert the needle Into the septum port, wait approximately ten
 seconds  for the  needle to  heat, then pump the plunger back and forth a few
 times. Rinse with the solvent  wash  hexane again.  Work the plunger up and down
 1n  the syringe barrel  to reduce excess hexane wash.  There should be approxi-
mately 0.5  uL  of  solvent left  1n the syringe  barrel following this final rinse.

Draw back  the  plunger so that  about 2 uL of air 1s 1n the barrel.  Draw 1.0 of
sample Into the  needle.  Usually to get a total of 2 uL of sample, 1t 1s
necessary  to pull the plunger  back  approximately 1.2 uL.  The sample should be
drawn up  Into  the barrel and the amount confirmed to be 2 uL.  If 1t 1s not, the
sample should be  expelled  and  the process repeated.

After getting  2.0 uL  of  sample Into the barrel, Insert the needle Into the
Injector port and wait 6 seconds.   Rapidly make the Injection.

After making the Injection,  remove  the needle as quickly as possible.  As soon
as the Injection 1s made,  start the GC.

-------
 METHOD

 Setup  and  Installation

 Step  1   Install  a  60-meter,  0.25-mm  ID fused silica SE54 capillary column.
         Set the  head pressure to approximately 15-20 ps1 and the split and
         sweep  flows to  30 mL/m1n and 6 mL/m1n respectively.

 Step 2  Establish  the appropriate MS Instrument conditions by optimizing the
         sensitivity for a low TCOD standard.  The optimization technique
         requires sequential  adjustments of the MID descriptor (Ion scanning
         rate), electron multiplier voltage, and Instrument resolution based on
         FC43 tune.  Instrument zero should be adjusted to give a reasonable
         background collection without serious loss of analytical signal.

 Step 3  Set GC conditions
            Injector temperature                         300°C
            Initial oven  temperature                     80°C
            Initial time                                 2.5 mln
            Secondary oven temperature                   200°C
            Ramp rate 1                                  20°C/m1n
            Final oven temperature                       300°C
            Ramp rate 2                                  !OaC/m1n
            Hold time at  final temperature               5 mln
            Separator temperature                        300°C
            Split/sweep time                             90 sec
            Filament/multiplier off time                 600 sec
            Filament/multiplier mode                     Auto
            Insert mode                                  Capillary
            Manifold temperature                         100°C

Step 4   Standards Calibration
         A  three-point Instrument calibration curve 1s created to establish
         linearity of Instrument response.  Standards containing 400,  1000,
         5000 pg/uL of native TCDD respectively with 100 pg/uL 37Cl4-TCDO  each
         and 200 pg/uL 13C12-TCDO each are run under the conditions  established
         1n Step 2.  Response factors are calculated and subsequent  analyses
         require only one standard (usually 5000 pg/jiL) 1f the response  factors
         do not change from the original calibration.  Response factors  are
         calculated as follows:

R   » Area  for native TCDPa x Cone of 37Cl4-TCDD
 fn "  Area for 37Cl4-TCDD    Cone of native TCDD
R   , Area for 13Ci2-TCDD x Cone of 37Cl4-TCDD
      Area for37Cl4-TCDOb   Cone of l3Ci2 TCDO

-------
 Step 5   Sample  calculations

 Native rrnn  in m Area for native TCDD8 Y  1  v u~i  *   *.   ^ • . % - -
 native TCDD  m »	_	_  x	X Vol of extract (yL) X 0.1 ng/yL
                  Area for  37Cl4TCDDb    RfN


     0.1  ng/uL -  Concentration of 37Cl4-TCDD 1n sample extract (ng/yL)
      TCDO 1. - *™ ;°r    ,12-TCO°   X -L X vol of «tnct {*) X 0.1
                Area for 37Cl4-
    X 13C12 TCOO recovered - "9 "C12 TCDD recovered 1n extract x 100%
                                ng ISC12 TCOO added to sample
Corrected native TCOO recovered - "*\\™ TcjO 1n extract (ng) x 10°
                                  * "^12 TCDO recovered 1n extract

% native TCDO recovered In sample - Corrected native TCDO recovered (ng) X 100
                                    Metgnt or original sample igj A starting
                                                cone (ng/g)
Where:
      a - Sum of areas for 1on 320 and 1on 322
      b - Area for Ion 328 -(0.009 X area for 1on 322)
      c * Sum of areas for 1on 332 and 334
          Response factor for nature TCOO
    Rf I » Response factor for l3Ci2-TCOO

-------
 8.2  SOIL CHARACTERIZATION
          Preliminary  soil  characterizations were completed  by  Raamot Associ-
 ates  (Raamot,  1983).   Grain size analyses, determinations of natural moisture
 content,  and  Modified  Proctor  compaction  tests were  undertaken  to  develop
 moisture/density  characteristics and  determine  optimum moisture  content  for
 permeability testing  at  various  densities.   Figure  24 presents  the grain size
 distribution  curve  of  the  Freehold  series soil  as  determined  by  Raamot.
 Figure  25 presents the  compaction  test report  showing maximum  compaction  of
 approximately  1890 kg/m3 (118  lbs/ft3) at US moisture content.   Permeability
 and density data  are  presented  in  Figure  26.   All of these  procedures were
 completed  using ASTM methods as  noted  in the figures.

          After these Initial  tests,  SAI/JRB  completed additional  soil
 characterizations.  The  additional testing  Included

         •     Grain  size distributions determined  by  wet and dry  sieve pro-
               cedures and pi pet  analyses;
         •     Percolation rates  under  constant  head versus  compaction/density
               relationships as expected in the  soil  columns used  to simulate
               CAT  tank testing;
         •     Mineraloglcal determinations  by X-ray diffraction;
         •     Total Organic Carbon (TOC);
         t     Cation Exchange  Capacity (CEC).

         Table 36. presents  the grain  size  distribution  obtained by wet sieve
 and  pipet analyses.   In  comparison  with  the  Raamot  analyses,  as the data
 illustrate, significantly  higher percentages of fines  (15S silt and 8* clay)
 were obtained  using the  wet sieve and  pipet techniques.  Approximately  95*  of
 the  theoretical  surface  area  1s represented by  these  fine  particle  sizes.
 This calculation  assumes spherical  particle  shapes and 1s  based on the mass
 and surface area  relationship  of each  size Interval (I.e.,  diameters of 4,  2,
 1, 0.5, 0.25,  0.125, 0.062, 0.031, 0.016, 0.008, 0.004, 0.002 and 0.001  mm).

         To determine the  effect of   the  degree of  soil   compaction  on the
percolation rates  in the soil   columns  being used to simulate CAT tank
                                     8-18

-------
                                                 U.A •TANOAIIO SIEVf NUWUR

                                                          » • » t> !•«•*•
00
I

VO
           •UMIMSUII   |  COMLCS
         CLAttiriCAliON
                                   tMJUOl MMIIM/TKATMUT UM   HUM   THIM fAUI. KM JI»U»
«* r MM. tr«ci
                                                             Ht
                                                                Silt. U.c« r Orwl.
                                                       GRADATION  CURVES

                                                 RAAMOT    ASSOCIATES
           FIGURE 24  Standard Grain Size  Gradation Curve from Raamot  Associates (Raamot.  198.1).

-------
00
I
M/l





|4O



t,.n
3IS°

1

E«o
||IZO
•
M
t
I







too




vu












































































































































1


































1*1

































\
ri


































•


































ec


































INI



















/













|
rn


















,/














o
T.


















^















P


















x















M


































Cl



















>>













|
NT

































6
or


































0


































•Y


































•

































2
IM

































o
NT










































































































































y
















.

















A







































COMPACTION TEST REPORT


PROJECT'
OKMCU. IMITin/tKMKNI UW
KIM INIH mil. NfM Jf«UI



SOURCE* ,,'....
curtttarf rit
TYPE FILL1



DESCRIPTION i M-|T*M c»» r MM. •

TFftT UFTMnni ASIN t-KSI. Mtfthorf C

SAMPLE NO.: |


tyfl.^M.if. 1U.I.M III
y«. D>i. OMiHi lli>e»
a^i.i.. tf^.f CMMI Cm. lit 	 	
HOT "rr «t-«"f *•" f««

RAAMOT ASSOCIATES
COMCULTINf tmiNUIIS

DATE* ftkriMry I. INI
•



































                FIGURE 25   Compaction Test Results from Raamot Associates (Raaraot, 1983)

-------
00

f\J
                     !.• i
                             lllllilliiiimillllllllMIIIIIIMIIIIIIIIIUIIIIIIIIIIMIIIIIIM
                                      i!!!!:1.1.1,1,:!!1.!;::::::::!:::::::::!::::::!!!:::!::!::
                             iiiiiiiiii iiiiiiiimiiiiiii.:«iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!ii!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
                             iiiiiiiiilllliillliiiilliliiiiiiiiiiiiliii!!!!!!!!!;!!!!!!!!!!!!!
                             • i  i i  i ii iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiniiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiijiiii ii ii
                             iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiniiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii   !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
                       i ir1
IN   IN  l«   IM   IM   IU  III  . Ill   111    ll«   IK   Hi  IU

•>.•  M.« N.I  •!.«  M.«   M.l  N.I  M.I  M.l   M.I  W.I   M.I. M.I
                                               DRY UNIT WEIGHT, IJ ,  (pel)

                                      COMPACTION (P«rc«n» ModlfUd Preolor Otnilly)
                                   PERMEABILITY VS. DENSITY

                                      RAAMOT ASSOCIATES,  RA.
                                                                                    8AUR.C SOURCEICimSMM Ml
                                                        PROJECT: CNHHOL
                                                        ™"    nwmum
                                                               I HIM fttU. KM JHSH
             FIGURE  ?6   Permeability Versus Density Relationship from Raamot Associates (Raamot. 1983)

-------
TABLE 36  Grain size distribution of  Freehold Sill by  .        ^
          Wet Sieve and PI pet Analyses  (Modified ASTlfD-422    9
      ~   using U.S. Bureau  of Soils Sieve  sizes).   ^
Class
Gravel
Sand
Silt
Clay 7
:|pkze Range
>1000ym
- 62yro to lOOOim
8un to 62yro
<8udi
Mass
(percent)
16
61
15
8
Theoretical
Surface Area^H
^C percent)
<.05 ,
5
«*
"" *? 61 ' "^ ,
                            8-22

-------
 performance,  the  soil was packed (as received) with a natural moisture content
 of 10 to  12%.   Using a percent moisture content of 115 and compacting the soil
 1n the columns  to a density of 1680 kg/m3  (105  Ibs/ft3),  an optimum percola-
 tion  rate  of  1.5  x 10"3  cm/sec   (4.9  x  10"5ft/sec)  (I.e.,  discharge  rate
 divided by  column diameter) was obtained  under a constant  60 on head (24 in).
 The  soil  column experiments and  percolation rate measurements were undertaken
 to provide  an  estimate  of  the expected  aqueous surfactant  flow  under field
 conditions.

          To  determine the  mineralogical   composition  of  the  Freehold soil,
 X-ray  diffraction"studies were undertaken by Technology of Materials Company,
 Santa  Barbara,  California.  The sample was  prepared by grinding and  sieving an
 aliquot of  soil  to 200 mesh  particle  size.  This  powder was then  run  1n  a
 Phillips  Electronics  X-ray  d1ffractometer, equipped with  a crystal monochro-
meter.  The X-ray diffraction charts were  analyzed  and phase  Identifications
were  made by comparison with  standard  data  in  MCPDS/ASTM diffraction files.
 (The  report  1s presented  in  Appendix  F.)   The  results  showed  quartz and
 feldspar  to be  the  only measurable constituents.  Quartz  was the major phase,
 representing at least 98% of the total weight.   Measurable  amounts  of any clay
minerals  did  not  appear in  the  native  sample  or  1n  an  additional   sample
 prepared  using  a  separation  of  the  clay  s'lzed  particles  by suspension in
water.  The color of the  Freehold  soil  suggested iron carbonate or  a hydrated
 iron  oxide;  however,  this color  is evidently caused by an Morpheus iron oxy*
hydroxide or  hydroxide,  because  measurable  peaks  were  not found  representing
the suspect phases.

         The total  organic  carbon  content  (TOC) of the  soil, as measured by
Laucks Testing  Laboratories,  Inc.  (using a Dohrraann  DC 80 TOC Analyzer), was
determined  on   a  sample  of  soil  prepared  by grinding  and  suspending 1n an
aqueous solution  of phophorlc add  and sodium  phosphate,  in  accordance with
EPA Method  415.1.   Th*  TOC valirt  MS  O.IK by Might,   This relatively  low
level  of  organic  matter  In the soil  Implies a relatively  low contribution by
organic matter to the adsorption potential  for organic contaminants.

         The cation exchange capacity (CEC)  of the soil was also  determined by
Laucks Laboratories.  The soil was  dried  and sieved through  an 18  mesh screen
                                     S-23

-------
and  the CEC  was  determined  by the  methods of  Jackson  (1960).    The  totarl
exchangeable metallic  cations and the  exchangeable  hydrogen were determined,
and  the results were combined  to  yield the total  CEC.   3w result  was  8.6  •
aiUiequiv«l«*ts ?«r  101) gnu,*an extremely  low  value, confirming the absence »
of wlneralogls  «Uy  1n the soil jt  The  reports  of the soil  characterizations
performed by Laucks Laboratories are presented 1n Appendices G and H.

-------
                                APPENDIX G

                                TOC ANALYSIS
 -tfing Laboratories, Inc
jcuih Hamey 5m«.5e«it>J*ahin?lcn 98X38 '206)757-5:60
                                                      Certificate
            andlechrucalGa VJUM
    Associates
476 Prospect- St.
La Jolla, CA  9-2038
ATTN:  Daniel Jf. Baxter

     SOIL
                                                                80702

                                                           April 22, 1!

                                                        P-0- 288677
            Marked:   Clarksburg Sediment
  Total Organic Carbon,  %
                                          —  0.12
                                        Respectfully submitted,
                                         » • *

                                        Laucks Testing Laboratories,  I:
  JMO: vb
                                      I ««•>*•» MM 01 I

-------
'L
,  *sting Laboratories, Inc
APPENDIX H

CEC ANALYSIS
                              Certificate
    juih Hamey 5iM«t. Seattle Ufcshinqjon 98108 (206) 767-5060
." misryMkJofcacio^y and Technical Ss vk.es
      Science Applications,  Inc.
      1200 Prospect St.
      P. 0. Box 2351
      La Jolla, CA  92038
   HTQN
          SOIL
                                         30971

                                   May  31.  1332

                                   P0=  365203
» "U
C
               Marked:   Clarksburg Soil
                        Dried  and sieved through an 18 mesh  screen
'I  PffMFQftMCD
«  SSULTS.
     Cation Exchange Capacity  • 8.6 meq Na/100 grains
                                              Respectfully submitted,

                                              Laucks Testing/Laboratories, Inc.
                                              Mike Nelson
     MN:bg
                         «•• e« iix utne*. nni*mt*. m i«n«r«i««
                               •TMM«««nT
                                              M *««MI«<• I

-------
;                            Adsee      799

                                Spreader-Penetrant

Organics Division, Witco Chemical Corporation

Bulletin 255	   	    September 1981

Adsee 799 surfactant is a multipurpose spray tank additive developed for use as a penetration aid and
wetting agent. One of the major uses of Adsee 799 surfactant is as a penetration aid for
"hydrophobia" or hard-to-wet soils. The addition of this surfactant to aqueous systems increases the
rate at which water is able to penetrate these soils.

Penetration modifiers offer the advantages of decreased soil erosion, unproved water drainage,
decreased water runoff and increased utilization of soil moisture by plants during hot weather condi-
tions. Other potential areas of research include its use as a soil conditioner for plants and trees and as.
a germination aid for seeds and bulbs.
Typical Properties
        Appearance	Slightly hazy liquid
        pH,5%in 1:3isbpropanol/water  	5-7
        PourPoint,°C(°F)	0 (38)
        FlashPoint, PMCC, °F	>200
        Specific Gravity at 25/4eC(77/39°F)	1.04
Suggested Use Rates
  Per 100 Gallons of Water


        General Soil Conditioner	 1 -2 pints (per 1000 sq.ft.)
        Penetration Aid for Irrigation	2-4 pints
        Preplant Conditioner for Trees and Shrubs	4-6 pints
Storage

        This product should be stored in tightly closed containers in a cool, dry area.
                                  Witco

-------
 Ptocaaa ovamtcaia Ptvtxon
 'Diamond Shamrock Cotputafaon
 350MtKembteAv«nue
 Mocrtstown. New Jersey 07960
 Diamond Shamrock
               Hyonic' NP  Series
                                           Product Bulletin
                                           OEN-tt
 The Hyonic NP Series of nonionic surfactants
 are potyethoxytated nonylphenols with
 average ethylene oxide contents off-12 moles
 per mole of nonylphenol. Each surfactant
 provides a unique combination of detergent,
 emulsifying and wetting properties which
 depend on the amount of ethylene oxide on the
 lipophilic portion of the molecule.
               The Process Chemicals Division currently
               offers six Hyonic NP nonionic surfactants
               which can be used alone or with other
               surfactants for a variety of uses involving
               detergency and wetting problems.
               This brochure is designed to assist in selecting
               the Hyonic NP surfactant best suited to each
               application.
Typical Properties
Product
Appearance
Moles E.O.
HLB
Activity. %
Density, Ib/gal
g/ml
Solubility, aqueous
Cloud point. «F/»C
(1% aqueou* solution)
Pour point. *F/°C
pH. 1% aqueous solution
Hyonic
NP-40
Clear
Liquid
4
9
>99
8.5
1.02
Dispersible
127/53
-21/-29
7.0
Hyonic
NP-60
Clear
Liquid
6
12
>99
8.7
1.04
Dispersible
127/53
-18/-28
7.0
Hyonie
NP-90
Clear
Liquid
9
13
>99
8.8
1.06
Clear
Solutions
129/54
36/2
7.0
Hyonie
NP-100
Clear
Liquid
10=
132
>99
8.9
1.07
Clear
Solutions
154/68
40/4
7.0
limniln
nyonic
NP-110
Clear
Liquid
11
13.6
>99
8.9
1.07
dear
Solutions
162/72
55/13
7.0
Hyonie
NP-120
Liquid to
semisolid;
Clear liquid
melt
12
14
>99
8.9
1.07
Clear
Solutions
196/91
59/15
7.0
           10 «copBonoicona»oniore»e>»nBinroi
      NOTMt
                                             noy ov nocMUOf
                      rge
                             •*
Prirftad in U.S.A.
•Diamond Shamrock Corporation 1983

-------
  Product Bulletin
 Surface Active Properties
 Product

 Surface Tension
  Dynes/cm 0.01%
  solution at 77*F/25°C

 Wetting Test (Draves)
  3 g hook, % required
  for a 25 second test

 Ross Miles foam Test
  77°F, 0.05% solution
  in distilled water
   mm Initial Foam
   mm foam after 5 min

Applications
 Hyonlc
 NP-40
   28
Insoluble
Insoluble
Insoluble
Hyonlc
NP-M
  30
 0.21
  10
  7
Hyonlc    Hyonlc    Hyonlc
NP-90    NP-100    NP-110
               Hyonlc NP-40

 Hyonlc NP-40 surfactant is a nonionic
 emulsifier useful in many formulated products.
 Among its applications are. the following:
    Emulsifier for solvent cleaning compounds
    Emulsifier for "waterless- hand cleaners
    Low foaming emulsifier for silicone
    products
    Solvent based metal cleaners
    Detergent for petroleum oils
    Viscosity reducer for plastisols
    Intermediate for production of anionic
    surfactants
    Emulsifier in agricultural emulsifiable
    concentrate formulations

               Hyonic NP-60
Hyonic NP-60 is a multi-purpose nonionic
surfactant which has found application in the
following areas:

•  Emulsifier for textile lubricants
•  Wetting agent for textile fibers
•  Intermediate for textile antistats
•  Detergent for all phases of textile
   processing
•  Color development enhancement in latex
   paint
•  Polymerization post - add stabilizer
•  Emulsifier in agricultural emulsifiable
   concentrate formulations
•  Color acceptance agent for tinted coatings
  31
 0.04
  52
  47
 32
0.05
 90
 80
 34
0.07
105
 95
                   Hyonlc
                   NP-120
 36
0.12
 115
 105
                    •  Eliminates color-pull in tinted coatings that
                       results from defoamer use
                    •  Helps eliminate "fish eyes" and other
                       wetting problems in coatings caused by
                       excess defoamer

                                  Hyonlc NP-90

                    Hyonic NP-90 has many uses involving
                    detergency and wetting problems. It will
                    continue to perform satisfactorily even if its
                    cloud point is slightly exceeded. Hyonic NP-90
                    has found favor as a co-emulsifier. It may be
                    used as follows:
                       Detergent for household and industrial
                       cleaning compounds
                       Detergent-penetrant for acid cleaning
                       solutions
                       Alkaline salt cleaners
                       Degreasing compounds
                       Detergent for all phases of textile
                       processing
                       Wetting agent for paper towelling or tissue
                       Paper deinking
                       Emulsifier and wetting agent in agricultural
                       applications

                         Hyonlc NP-100 and Hyonlc NP-110
                    Hyonic NP-100 and Hyonlc NP-110 are
                    versatile surfactants which strike the optimum
                    balance between solubility and detergent
                    properties. Their range of application is
                    broader than other members of the series and
                    includes:

-------
  Product Bulletin
''  »  Bases for liquid dishwashing detergents
  •  Detergents for low temperature laundry
     preparations
  •  Wetting agents in mineral acid and alkali
     solutions
  •  Bases for household and industrial
     formulated cleaners
  »  Penetrants for corrosion inhibitors
  >  Emulsifier adjuvants  in liquid formulations
  •  Stabilizers for latex preparations
  •  Rewetting agents for paper, towelling and
     tissue
  >  Hide soaking
  •  Paper deinking
  •  Emulsifiers and wetting agents in
     agricultural applications

               Hyonte NP-120

  tyonic NP-120 consists  of approximately 12
  .notes of ethylene oxide  per mole of nonyl
  phenol. This ratio permits excellent detergency
   nd wettability for

  *   High temperature detergent formulations
  *   Detergent-penetrant  use in concentrated
 ,,    olutions of electrolytes
     Vetting agents in caustic solutions
  *   Coemuisifiers  for oiMn-water emulsions

   DA  and EPA Status

  Food Packaging Use

   he Hyonte NP series of nonionic surfactants
  Jiscussed in this brochure comply with the
  following indirect food-contact applications of
   I CFR:

  175.105   Adhesives
  176.180   Components of Paper and
           Paperboard in Contact with Dry
           Food
  176.210   Defoaming Agentt Used in the
           Manufacture of Paper and
           Paperboard
  .78.3120  Animal Glue
  178.3400  Emulsifiers and/or Surface-Active
           Agents
 Agricultural Use

 Hyonte NP emulsifiers are cleared by the EPA
 under 40 CFR. 180.1001 (c) and (e). Paragraph
 (c) of this regulation exempts residues from the
 requirement of a tolerance when used in
 accordance with good agricultural practice as
 inert (or occasionally active) Ingredients in
 pesticide formulations applied to growing
 crops or raw agricultural commodities after
 harvest Furthermore, clearance, under this
 section enables a grower or applicator (by
 reference to 21 CFR  182.99) to add these
 surfactants to a pesticide use dilution prior to
 applying it to a raw agricultural commodity.

 In addition,  these nonionic surfactants also
 comply with FDA regulation 21 CFR 172.710
 which permits a grower or applicator to add
 them to a pesticide use dilution  before
 application to a growing crop.

 All Hyonte NP emulsifiers comply with
 180.1001 (e). a list of exempt inert ingredients
 which can be used in pesticide formulations
 applied to animals. They should be evaluated in
 your toxicant formulations for this application.
Packaging, Storage and Handling

Hyonte NP surfactants are shipped in 55 gallon
(200 liter) steel drums and bulk. No special
handling or storage precautions are necessary.
Additional handling information is contained in
material safety data sheets which are available
on request
Freight Classification

Members of the Hyonte NP series are classified
as: Cleaning, Scouring or Washing
Compounds NOI; or Soap, NOI Liquid or other
than Liquid or Soap Powders.
                                                                                    QEN-M
                                                                                      2/83

-------
Product Bulletin

-------
                                                                    SOLVENT
                                                                                DATA
                                                                                       BULLETIN NO. FST-1
                                 "FREON"  TF  SOLVENT
INTRODUCTION
  "Freon" TF is trichlorotrifluoroftharm, a member of the
family of fiuorocarbon chemicals developed and marketed
under Ou Font's trademark, "Freon". Originally developed
as refrigerants,  these compounds are now widely used as
solvents and cleaning agents, fire extinguishing  agents, di-
electric fluids, aerosol propeUants, chemiral reaction media
and coolants. In common with other memben of the flooro-
-arbon family, "Fieon" TF is nonflammable, chemically and
 jermally stable, low in toxicity and recoverable  by distilla-
flbn without decomposition.
  This same chemical is also marketed as "Preon" Precision
OgMimj Agent under a different product' specification that
controls particulates and sets a slightly higher standard for
nonvolatile matter.
  The applicable military specification for trichlorouifluoro-
ethane is Mil-OS 1302B (Type  I applies to "Freon"  PCA
and Type II applies to "Freon" TF).
     sensitive parts from damage. This property also helps
     to bold soils in the boiling solvent and prevent distil-
     lation into  the vapor zone where they may  be  re-
     deposited on  objects  being given a final vapor rinse.
Since the chemistry of soils varies greatly, the chemistry
of the cleaning agent must be similarly adjusted to remove
them. For this reason, "Freon" TF is also used as the base
for a variety of "Freon" solvent formulations, all of which in-
herit  desirabk properties of their parent  and extend the
cleaning action of "Freon" deaning systems  to cover a
significant range of the spectrum  of soils.  This  bulletin
describes  only the properties  and uses of  "Freon" TF;
bulletins giving similar  information for "Freon" solvent
formulations can be obtained by calling one of the phone
numbers on the last page  or from  an authorized "Freon"
solvent  distributor.
"FREON" TF AS A CLEANING SOLVENT
  "Freon" TF is useful not only because of the properties
enumerated above but
   1. It has a very low surface tension, enabling it to wet
     surfaces and  get between soils and  the surfaces on
     which they are deposited, thus assisting hi removal of
     the soil
  2. It has a high density, which  helps to displace soils
     from surfaces of parts  being cleaned and to float
     these soils to the surface of the solvent.
  3. It has an unusually low latent beat  of vaporization,
     which means that the condensing vapor  necessary
     in vapor degreasing processes  can be generated with
     low energy input
  4. It has a low boiling point (117.6T  at sea level) so
     parts being cleaned in boiling solvent are cool enough
     to handle immediately while protecting temperature-
   TaMe of Contents                           Page
   Introduction                                   1
   "Freon" TF as a Cleaning Solvent                1
   Physical Properties                             2
   56MCDM SOfWfn PDWGT                         2
   Effect on Materials of Construction               3
   Electrical Properties                            7
   Penetration and Wetting Power                  7
   Surface Tension                               8
   Stability                                      8
   Purity                                        9
   Cleaning Processes, Equipment and Uses          9
   Applications                                   9
   Safety                                       10
   Environmental and Occupational Legislation      11
   Specifications                                11
   Packaging and Availability                     11
•FREON is Ou Font's r«cist«r««l tr»d«m»rk tor its Huorocartton compounds.

-------
 PHYSICAL PROPERTIES

   "Freon" TF is a pure, stable, chemical compound. It is a
 clear, dense, colorless liquid having a faint solvent odor.
 Table  I lists the physical properties which characterize
 "Freon" TF.  Liquid density and vapor pressure curves of
 "Freon" TF as a functioa of temperature are given-in Figures
 land!
                FIGURE 1 liquid Density vs. TempertriureT?
  Table I. Physical Properties
            of "FREON" TF
Chemical Formula
Molecular Weght
Boiioi Point at OM Atmosphere, f
                        •C
Fraeanf Point, f
           •C
Critical Temperature, *F
               •C
Critical Pressure, psii
             atm
Density at 77*F(2S*C)
  Liquid. fes/fiL
       Ibs/m
CCItF-CClFi
  187.4
  117.6
   47.6
 -31
 -35
  417.4
  214.1
  495.0
   317

   13*
   S2.C9
  Saf d Vapor at boiinf point. lbs/R>
                    grams/Stw
Lstmt Hist of Vaporization at b.p, Btu/Ib
                         csl/|nm
Spacific Heat at TtTF (2L1*C). Bht/Ob) CO or csl/f ran CQ
'Liqaid
  Saf d Vapor (Cp)
Thermal Conductivity at
  Uqyid
  SaTd Vapor
Vlseoaty at TVf (21.1'C). Cenbpaists
  Uqoid
  SaTd Vapor
Rtfradh* Index of IJqwd at Mff (21SX)
Sarfact Tenson at 77T (ZS^ftM/oi
Rtlalno Oieioctrie StraMfOi (sfTnis*- 0

  Li««d it 77^(25^ 100 Hi
  SaTd Vapor (0.5 atm) it
Sohtbiity of ««tr it 7(rr (2U*CX X by wt
Solubility in wattr at saturation pressura < TtTF
  (21.lt) % by wt
Oifnjswity in sir at 7TF (2S*C) and I atm, cn*/ssc
                               ft1/hour
Toiicrry
  (TWM»pm)
   0.4619
   7J99
   S3.12
   3SJI7

   (L213
   0.152

   (L043
   0.00430

   0.694
   00102
   L355
   17J
   4.4

   2.41
   1JJ10
   0.009

   0.017
   OJKI
   0.264

    1000
                      0  20   40  *0   SO  100 1M  140  1*0 ISO  900
                                     TSMfVATUM. *P.

                FIGURE 2 Vapor Pressure vs.  Temperature
                 too
                  •0
                                                                   0  10  M M 40 SO M 70  M  110 130 ISO
                                                                                                                300
                                                               Figure 3 gives psycfarometric curves for "Freon" TF vapors
                                                             in air. At room temperature, one pound of air is capable of
                                                             holding four pounds of "Fnon" TF vapors. The tremendous
                                                             appetite of air for -Ficon" TF means that drying will take
                                                             place rapidly at room temperature. In forced air drying sys-
                                                             tems or ventilation systems, the size and cost of air handling
                                                             equipment is kept to an absolute minimum.
                                                             SELECTIVE 'SOLVENT POWER
                                                               An outstanding advantage of "Freon" TF is its abihty to
                                                             dean without ^iMgfag any of toe materials of construction
                                                             of the article being dsened. It • selective in its cleaning acuon
                                                             because it wul dissolve or flush away the contaminants on the
                                                             article and yet wul not attack metals, plastics, or elastomers.
                                                               Table II gives typical  guJdeposn on the compatibtlm  of
                                                             "Freon" TF with a variety of materials. In general it B com-
                                                             pletely mtscibte with petroleum hydrocarbons, chkmruied
                                                             hydrocarbons, lower aliphatic alcohols, ketones, ethers, esters.
                                                             animal, vegetable and mineral oils.
                                                               Thus "Freon" TF is compatible with most organic systems.
                                                             When they are present on articles, as soils or contaminants,
                                                             "Freon" TF wul remove them leaving a residue-free surface.
                                                             Most  of  the materials in the "miscibfc" column are  also
                                                             cleaning media. "Freon" TF can be substituted for these in
                                                             most cases or used as a final cleaning step to remove tracts of
                                                             these cleaning media or residues they leave behind.

-------
             FIGURE 3 PsydirofiMtric Chart
                                   '
               It

               17
              11
              12


              10
               f
               I
               r
               *
               s
               4
               3
               I
               1
, J'FIEON" TF VAPO* IN All;
 AT ATMOSFHUIC FtESSURt
               fee***".
"%}&/•&&*$*&£•?* ,
 -r "-•••  •.••"'••"• -:v^?s- I]
 ...  _^.;.:/.._. .. j/.^i,^;. 5J
                         MT tuu numKAnitf. •*.
       The solvent power of "Freon" TF k intermediate between
     aliphatic hydrocarbons and chlorinated hydrocarbon solvents.
 _   Since there is no single scale which can rate solvent power on
  )> an absolute basis, it is always recommended that specific sot-
     vent tests be run for a specific soil However, a general guide
,,    » relative solvent ratings can be  obtained by the  OM of
     Kauri-Butanol  (KB) numbers and  sohibflity parameters.
     These guides are two independent empirical systent for esti-
     mating solvent power and are given in Table in for a number
     orsolvents. In general, the higher the munben on these sol-
     vent scales, the stronger the solvent. In actual practice then
     an many exceptions to the relative ratings suggested by these
     guides. Solvent power is only one of a number of physical and
                                           chemical factors involved in the selection of a cleaning agent.
                                           It should be used only for the purpose of the crudest possible
                                           screening of candidate cleaning materials.
                                            Table III. Guides to Relatfv«~'
                                                       Solvent Power~
                                                                   Kaurl-Butanol    Solubility
aoiwrn nunia«r rarwnvnr
Kerosene
"Freon" TF
n-Heptan*
Stoddard Solveirt
"Freon" TA
"Freon" TMC
Benzene
1.1.1-Triehloroethane*
Trichloroathylene
Methytone Chloride
Chloroform
29
31
35
37-39
51
86
105
120
130
136
208
7*
72
7.4
7.4-7.5
—
—
9.2
—
9.3
9.7
9.3
inallul nMnmfnrm
                                           EFFECT ON MATERIALS OF CONSTRUCTION
                                             A clear-cut distinction must be made between the following
                                           when using the term "materials of construction" hi rfainhig
                                           applications:
                                               1. The materials used in construction of the article being
                                                 cleaned which is exposed for relatively brief time inter-
                                                 vals to the cleaning agent under, a specific set of
                                                 conditions.
                                               2. The materials used in construction of  the cleaning
                                                 equipment which involves continuous exposure to the
                                                 solvent under a variety of conditions.
                                             With few exceptions "Freon" TF can be used to dean
                                           articles made of any material of construction. However, clean-
                                           ing equipment construction materials should be selected to
                                           withstand an use conditions, ^r"1*"" steel is the most com-
                                           monly used construction material
       Table II. Solubility of Various Substances in
                 "FREON" TF Solvent at Room Temperature
         Misctbto
                                  Moderately Soluble
                                                        Slightly Soluble
                                                                                            Insoluble
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon Tetrachlortde
Ckl^M^MMW
nwfvforni
Diethyl Ether
Ethanol
Hexane
Kerosene
Methyl Alcohol
Mineral Oil
Ethyl Acetate
Azobeflzene
Benzophefwne
Camphor
Cocoa Butter
Cottonseed Oil
Naphthalene
Thymol
Trlbromophenol
Silteone Oils


AcstanilM*
BenzJI
Benzole Acid
Diphenyl
Oiphenyl Carbinol
Ester Gum
Hexachtoroethane
Pnthalic Anhydride
Stearto Acid
Paraffin Wax
(MP 126T)
Aoatamide
Antnric0n<
Gum Mastic
1 n ft nMn f^n
Ivwwvvffl
Phenol
Salicylic Acid
TartartcAcId
Urea
Paraffin Wax
(MP 141«F)

Agar
Caeein
Canutes* Acetate
Oetatin
Nitrocellulose
Shellac
Starch
Sugar
Water
Gryceral ft Most
Polyhydric Alcohols
                                                               'WON to 0»

-------
  SAFETY
              -Tram" TF is not flammable or explosive
  and has no flash point To illustrate the beneficial effect of
  "Freon" TF solvent's nonflammable characteristics, a num-
  ber of flammable solvents were blended with "Ficon"  TF
  at  various ooocenusrieni, Data in Table XIV show  the
  extent to which "Freon" TF elevates the initial flash point
  of these other solvents. It must be borne in mind, however.
  that "Freon" TF may hare a higher rate of evaporation
  than the flammable solvents. Consequently, if a significant
  amount of evaporation occurs, the flammability  property
  of the mixture, as measured by flash points, tends to return
  to the more hazardous condition. Generally, however, some
  beneficial elevation of initial flash point is usually retained,
  at least until more than 50% of the blend has evaporated.
 Table XIV.  Effect of "FREON" TF In
                Suppressing Flash Points of
                Flammable Solvents  • •- -
                          Initial Flash Point *f*
   "Freon" TF         Weight % "Freon" TF in Blend
   Blended with         0    10   20    30  40   60
   Acetone
   Ethanoi
   Toluene
   VM4P Naphtha
                     3         36
                    55   100  115
                    40   83  103
                    35   46   57
      70   104
120
     107
 67   72
  Stoddard  Solvent  150   155  178
  Mineral Spirits     130   147  165
•Ctavotantl Opon Cup
                                     182
 Toxidty—"Freon" TF is low in toxkity and its TWA (8-
 hour Tune-Weighted Average value), as calculated accord-
 ing to OSHA procedures, is 1.000 ppm. This is the maximum
 Time-Weighted Average  vapor concentration allowed by
 OSHA regulations for continuous exposure  of workers hi
 an eight-hour day, 40-hour week.
   "Freon" TF solvent is less toxic than most other commer-
 cial solvents (see Table XV) and therefore can be used with
 fewer restrictions;  but as with all solvents,  inhalation of
 high concentrationsjs daflfvoos and can prove fatal Any>
 one suffering from the uo£ effects of the vapor should im-
 mediately move or be asjjjfpd to  fresh air. When  treating
 persons suffering toxic effects due to exposure to vapors of
 "Freon" TF and most other commercial solvents, the use
 of tpinephrine and similar drugs should be avoided be-
 cause they may produce  cardiac arrhythmias, including
 ventricular fibrillation.
   In most plant situations, existing ventilation systems may
 be adequate for keeping "Freon" TF vapors  at a safe con-
centration (less than 1,000 ppm).* However, each and every
 case should  be scrutinized carefully  to make sure that
 •*ood safety practice is being followed. Special ventilation
 nould be provided in work areas where high concentra-
 tions are likely to occur (e.g. spraying operations) and in low
 places where heavy vapors may collect Storage tanks, vapor
                                                          degreascrs, and other confined spaces must not be entered
                                                          (even if only for making an inspection) without observing
                                                          standard safe tank entry procedures.
                                                                                         .
                                                         Tabje_XV. 8-Hour Time-Weighted Average
                                                         JT-.III *Aeheaa««fc>-_iv   -      -•-    .. «*• » *    — . • fc    •: *.'    »**
                                                                      Concentrations for Some^C?:
                                                                      Common Solvents' as Allowed * '
                                                                      by. Occupational Safety and- ^
                                                                      Health Administration  — -,
Substance *
"Freon" TF
Ethyl alcohol
Hexane
Stoddard solvent
Methytene chloride
1,1.1 Trichloroethene (Methyl ehlorol
rvrcnioroemyMne
Trichtoroethylene
Benzene
Carbon Tetrachloride
TWA1
(ppm)
1,000
1.000
500(100)*
500(100)*
500K100)*
term) 350
100*
100*
50*(10)»
10*<10)»
                                                            1. tipnmtt •• pvti ptr MMtan * vapor In cmnnlimu itr
                                                              mtutc OMte» M aS*C «nd no mm Hf gnmun. (So* Co* of
                                                              ^•gmtucitt, as (Ubor). PM§ isoo M isit (My. itit).
                                                            2. Th»»»
   1. MmKxr» to
                                          |.
             Binngiini M ThrMkeM UnN VafeM OLV« ta ppw)
             M Ittl by •»• AiMricjo ContocMM of Qo»^n<^n<»<
  The preceding information shows that "Freon" TF is
unique among commercial solvents because it is both ooo-
fiainmable and. low in toxictty. To our knowledge there have
been no implications to date of caxctoogenicity, mutagenic-
iry.orteratofeakiryajsociatedwUitrichlcfocrinuo^
                                                         in animal studies and human experience. A summary chart
                                                         comparing these safety properties with other solvents is given
                                                         in Figure 4.
                                                           The Du Pont Company and its authorized agents will
                                                         gladly supply •fr't^ntt in analyzing use conditions and in
                                                         specifying equipment, handling and monitoring procedures
                                                         needed to assure safe operation with "Freon" TF solvent

                                                         Deeoeapo«lne«—Although  "Freon" TF solvent  is non-
                                                         flammable and will not support combustion, it can be de-
                                                         composed by open flame or hot surfaces such as inr space
                                                         heaters,  The  decomposition products are corrosive  and
                                                         toxic,  but they  an so irritating mat persons working in
                                                         their presence find them almost impossible to ignore. Good
                                                         ventilation minimizes hazards from decomposed solvent
                                                           Concentratiom of  "Freon" TF vapors wen  below  the
                                                         TWA level win, in time,  severely damage space healers if
                                                         vapors an drawn into the healer combustion  area.  Pro-
                                                         vision should be made for an indrpcnoVnt supply of air or
                                                         the  use of another type of heating system.

                                                         SUn and Ey» Contact—If "Freon" TF is splashed in the
                                                         eyes, it may cause irritation. Should this occur, immediately
                                                         flush the eyes with water  and obtain medical  attention.
                                                           Since "Freon" TF  dissolves natural ofls, it may lead to
                                                         skin cracking and irritation. Prolonged contact should be
                                                         avoided. Hands should be protected with  neoprene gloves
                                                         if prolonged or repeated contact is expected. Clothing that
                                                         becomes wet with "Freon" TF should be removed at once.

-------
          MnmuMt CMMBBC
                               I
NAFHTMA
noooAto sotvwt
       mm
                                                         earth metals neb as sodium, potassium, and barium ia their
                                                         free metallic form. These materials become more reactive
                                                         when finery 'ground or powdeied and, in this state,  mag-
                                                         nesium and aluminum may react with fiuorocarbons  espe-
                                                         cially at  high  temperatures. Highly  reactive  materials
                                                         should not be brought into contact with fluorocarboos until
                                                         a  careful  study is made and appropriate safety  precau-
                                                         tions an taken.

                                                         ENVIRONMENTAL AND OCCUPATIONAL LEGISLATION
                                                            "Preen" TF is a saturated fluorocarboo and is not photo-
                                                         chemkaDy reactive. This b reflected in minimum restrictions
                                                         on its use imposed by federal and stale regulations under the
                                                         dean Air Act of 1970, and the Environmental  Protection
                                                         Agency.
                                                            The tow order of toxiehy and general safety inherent in the
                                                         us*  of "Freon" TF provides a wide margin of safety for
                                                         employees and racilitates compliance  with the Occupational
                                                         Safety and Health Act of 1970 (OSHAX

                                                         SPECIFICATIONS
                                  Ecuiototvi
                                  TtnAMVOaOWSAN
Appearance

ComposWan (by weight)
  TriduoroWfluoroethsne
Chloride ion, expressed as a
Moisture (by weight)
Acidity (mg KOH per gram of sample)
Residue (Soluble and (insoluble, combined)
  (by weight)
deer color-
less liquid

99.80% min.
0.1 pom max.
lOppm max
0.003 max,
2 pom max.
          "Freon" TF should not be taken internally.
Reactivity—Those doing unusual experimental and devel-
opmental  work with "Freon"  TF should be  aware that
fluoracarbons, like other hatocarbons, may react violently
with highly reactive materials, including alkali and alkaline
                        PACKAGING AND AVAILABILITY
                        Treon" TF solvent is available in 5- and 55-gallon drums
                        and in tank truck and tank car quantities. Prompt delivery
                        is assured  by the easy availability of many Authorized
                        Distributors located throughout the country.
NOTES
                                                          FftfON M On *•*•• «••**•<•« tndMMrt tar Hi •Miacartin ce«i»«ui>di

-------
Table 2.  Soil Washer Laboratory Feasibility Study Experimental Summary
       Starting Concentration of Native TCDD on  Soil  is  671  ng/g

 Tl
loluene/IPA
4:1 v/v
Freon

Freon/MeOH
4:1 v/v
Diesel Fuel/
M^O
4:1 v/v
Kerosene/H^O
1 :4 v/v
H20

It NP 90
IX Adsee 799


21 HP 90
2i Adsee 799

31 NP 90
31 A.lsee 799



Stage 1


Stage 2


Stage 3
Stage 4
(Wash)
Stage b
(Residue by Soxliltl )

» 1
* !
1 4
^ 1
#3 2
7 1
P 2
1 1
•0 2

'1 1
'2-2
'3 1
'< 2
// ,
iV-2
n 3
IP 4
'•» 1
?o 2
'*4 3
un
2-3 i
•M?
85
89
75.9
78.1
76.6
76.2
76.5
81.2
64.5
60.0

52.9
46.1
0.05
0.06
18.4
45.2
32.4
35.0
60.5
51.1
55
54
57.0
57.3
100
74
162
147
157
160
158
122
238
268

316
362
671
671
548
368
454
436
268
325
302
309
288
286
85.0
89.0
75.9
78.1
76.6
76.2
76.5
81.2
64.5
60.0

52.9
46.1
0.05
0.06
18.4
45.2
32.4
35.0
60.5
51.1
55
54
57.0
57.3
10.9
11.0
14.3
12.1
13.0
13.4



14.2
9.2


24.3
25.6


20.2
19.6
25.0
20.5
20.5
NA
89
73
61
78
70
36



221
300


384
196


130
197
134
171
151

86.8
89.1
90.9
88.3
89.5
94.6



67.1
55.3


42.7
70.8


80.7
70.7
80.0
74.5
77.5
NA
1.6
1.6
4.1
4.1
1.4
1.5



5.3
4.4


26.1
18.1


4.8
7.5
7.0
5.2
5.8
NA
79
62
33
51
61
26



185
270


209
74


97
146
87
136
112

88.4
90.7
95.0
92.4
90.9
96.1



72.4
59.7


68.8
88.9


85.5
78.2
87.0
79.7
83.3
NA
12.4
13.3
7 3
7.6
3.0
2.8
'


21.5
NA


2.3 194 71.1 27.6
1.9 62 90.8 26.8


2.77 78 88.3 NA
2.65 128 80.9 NA
1.78 75 88.8 22.1
1.75 124 81.5 20.1
1.2 104 84.5 13.2
NA NA NA
83
89
49
51
21
19



144



IBS
ISO



148
133
08

101
104
102 3
100
93 9
9B.9



93.9
NA


go.;
117.6


NA
NA
110.9
101.4
9;.;
NA

-------
Table 2   Soil  washer  Laboratory Feasibility St.idy Experimental Sugary
       Starting Concentration of Native TCDD on Soil is 671 ng/g

A,
lolnene/lPA
4:1 v/v


Freon

Freon/MeOII
4:1 v/v
Diesel Fuel/
1120
4:1 v/v
Kerosene/MzO
1:4 v/v
II20

|I NP 90
IX Adsee 799


21 HP 90
21 Adsee 799
31 HP 90
31 Adsee 799

Stage 1


Stage 2

Stage 3
Stage 4
(Hash)
Staqe 'j
(Des nine l>y Soxlilcl )

* 1 85
^2 89
9 3 75.9
"[ 4 78. 1
^ 1 76.6
"=• 2 76.2
71 76.5
(,' 2 81.2
9 1 64.5
'0 2 60.0

'1 1 52.9
'L~2 46.1
'3 1 0,05
'4 2 0.06
'* 1 18.4
l<,2 45.2
r/ 3 32.4
IP 4 35.0
'1 1 60.5
7°2 51.1
^ 3 55
24.4 54
^-3 1 57.0
2.<,2 57.3
100 85.0
74 89.0
162 75.9
147 78.1
157 76.6
160 76.2
158 76.5
122 81.2
238 64.5
268 60.0

316 52.9
362 46.1
671 0.05
671 0.06
548 18.4
368 45.2
454 32.4
436 35.0
268 60.5
325 51.1
302 55
309 54
288 57.0
286 57.3


10.9
11.0
14.3
12.1
13.0
13.4



14.2
9.2


24.3
25.6


20.2
19.6
25.0
20.5
20.5
NA


89
73
61
78
70
36



221
300


384
196


130
197
134
171
151


86.8
89.1
90.9
88.3
B9.5
94.6



67.1
55.3


42.7
70.8


80.7
70.7
80.0
74.5
77.5
NA


1.6 79
1.6 62
4.1 33
4.1 51
1.4 61
1.5 26



5.3 185
4.4 270


26.1 209
18.1 74


4.8 97
7.5 146
7.0 87
5.2 136
5.8 112
NA


88.4
90.7
95.0
92.4
90.9
96.1



72.4
59.7


68.8 2.3
88.9 1.9


85.5 2.77
78.2 2.65
87.0 1.78
79.7 1.75
83.3 1.2
NA NA















194
62


78
128
75
124
104


12 4
13.3
7.3
7.6
3.0
2.8



21.5
NA


71.1 27.6
90.8 26.8


88.3 NA
80.9 NA
88.8 22.1
81.5 20.1
84.5 13.2
NA NA


83
89
49
51
21
19



144



185
180



148
133
88


101
104
102 1
100
93.9
on. 9



93.9
NA


98.7
117.6


NA
NA
110.9
101.4
97.7
NA

-------
                         Table  2.   Soil  Washer  Laboratory  Feasibility Study  Experimental  Summary
                                  Starting Concentration  of  Native  TCDD on  Soil is  671  ng/g
                                                                                                           Stage  4
                                                                                                           (Hash)
                                                                                                              Stdy SnxMt-l )
Toluene/I PA
  4:1  v/v
freofi       -i
            K J


rreon/MeOII   7
  4:1 v/v     tf

Diesel Fuel/  9
  11^0        'C
  4:1 v/v

Kerosene/H^
  1:4  v/v

11^0
21 NP90
21 Adsee  799
3% HP 90
31 Adsee  799
              '1  1
             '1-2
|X NP 90       tf 1
|X Adsee  799   \(, 2
              rf 3
              if 4
             ^ 3
             ii.4
76.
76.

76.
81.
                      64.5
                      60.0
52.9
46.1

 0.05
 0.06

IB.4
45.2
32.4
35.0
60
51
55
54
57.0
57.3
157
160

158
122

238
268
316
362

671
671

548
368
454
436

268
325
302
309

288
286
                                      76.6
                                      76.2
                                      76
                                      81
                64.5
                60.0
52.9
46.1

 0.05
 0.06

IB.4
45.2
32.4
35.0

60.5
51.1
55
54

57.0
57.3
14.3
12.1

13.0
13.4
                        14.2
                         9.2
                        24.3
                        25.6
20.2
19.6
25.0
20.5

20.5
 HA
61
78

70
36
         221
         300
         384
         196
                                 130
                                 197
                                 134
                                 171

                                 151
                                        90.9
                                        88.3

                                        (19.5
                                        94.6
                                        67.1
                                        55.3
                                        42.7
                                        70.8
                                BO. 7
                                70.7
                                80.0
                                74.5

                                77.5
                                 NA
                                          4.1
                                          4.1

                                          1.4
                                          1.5
                                         5.3
                                         4.4
                                        26.1
                                        18.1
                                                                        4.8
                                                                        7.5
                                                                        7.0
                                                                        5.2

                                                                        5.8
                                                                        NA
                                           33
                                           51

                                           61
                                           26
                                                                                185
                                                                                270
                                                                               209
                                                                                74
                                  97

                                 146
                                  67
                                 13G

                                 112
95.0
92.4

90.9
96.1
                                         72.4
                                         59.7
                                        6B.8
                                        BO. 9
                               85.5

                               78.2
                               87.0
                               79.7

                               83.3
                                HA
                                         2.3
                                         1.9
                                                                                                2.77

                                                                                                2.65
                                                                                                1.78
                                                                                                1.75

                                                                                                1.2
                                                                                                NA
                                                                                                        194
                                                                                                         62
                                                                                   78

                                                                                  128
                                                                                   75
                                                                                  124

                                                                                  104
                        71.1
                        90.fi
                        88.3

                        BO.9
                        88.8
                        81.5

                        84.5
                         HA
                                                                                                                         7.3
                                                                                                                         7.6

                                                                                                                         3.0
                                                                                                                         2.n
                                                                21.5
                                                                 NA
27.6
26. B
 NA

 NA
22.1
20.1

13.2
 NA
                                                                                                           49
                                                                                                           51

                                                                                                           21
                                                                                                           19
                                                                                                          141
ins
I no
148
133

 88
                                                                                          I02.3
                                                                                          UK)

                                                                                           91.9
                                                                                           911.9
                                                  9J.9
                                                   NA
                                                                                                                   W.I
  NA

  NA
110.9
101.4

97.7
 NA

-------