oEPA
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Solid Waste And
Emergency Response
(5201 G)
SUPERFUND:
EPA/540/R-95/087 V
PB95-962919
9200.5-717 C
May 1995
Progress at
National
Priority
List Sites
. i.—
KANSAS
1995 UP DATE
Printed on Recycled Paper
-------
How to Use the NPL Book
')
f ""
o
T
A
The site fact sheets presented in this book
are comprehensive summaries that cover a
broad range of information. The fact sheets
describe hazardous waste sites on the NPL and
their locations, as well as the conditions
leading to their listing ("Site Description").
The summaries list the types of contaminants
that have been discovered and related threats
to public and ecological health ("Threats and
Contaminants"). "Cleanup Approach" pres-
ents an overview of the cleanup activities
completed, underway, or planned. The fact
sheets conclude with a brief synopsis of how
much progress has been made in protecting
public health and the environment. The
summaries also pinpoint other actions, such as
legal efforts to involve polluters responsible
for site contamination and community con-
cerns.
The fact sheets are arranged in alphabetical
order by site name. Because site cleanup is a
dynamic and gradual process, all site informa-
tion is accurate as of the date shown on the
bottom of each page. Progress is always being
made at NPL sites, and the EPA periodically
will update the site fact sheets to reflect recent
actions. The following two pages show a
generic fact sheet and briefly describe the
information under each section.
How Can You Use
This State Book?
You can use this book to keep informed
about the sites that concern you, particu-
larly ones close to home. The EPA is commit-
ted to involving the public in the decision
making process associated with hazardous
waste cleanup. The Agency solicits input from
area residents in communities affected by
Superfund sites. Citizens are likely to be
affected not only by hazardous site conditions,
but also by the remedies that combat them.
Site cleanups take many forms and can affect
communities in different ways. Local traffic
may be rerouted, residents may be relocated,
temporary water supplies may be necessary.
Definitive information on a site can help
citizens sift through alternatives and make
decisions. To make good choices, you must
know what the threats are and how the EPA
intends to clean up the site. You must under-
stand the cleanup alternatives being proposed
for site cleanup and how residents may be
affected by each one. You also need to have
some idea of how your community intends to
use the site in the future, and you need to know
what the community can realistically expect
once the cleanup is complete.
The EPA wants to develop cleanup methods
that meet community needs, but the Agency
only can take local concerns into account if it
understands what they are. Information must
travel both ways in order for cleanups to be
effective and satisfactory. Please take this
opportunity to learn more, become involved,
and assure that hazardous waste cleanup at
"your" site considers your community's
concerns.
-------
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Provides the dates when the
site was Proposed, made Final,
and Deleted from the NPL.
SITE RESPONSIBILITY
Identifies the Federal, State,
and/or potentially responsible
parties taking responsibility
for cleanup actions at the site.
ENVIRONMENTAL
PROGRESS
Summarizes the actions to
reduce the threats to nearby
residents and the surrounding
environment and the progress
towards cleaning up the site.
SITE NAME
STATE
EPA ID# ABCOOOOOOO
Site Description
EPA REGION XX
COUNTY NAME
LOCATION
Other Names:
: xxx xxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxx :
: xxxxxxxxxx xxxx xxxxxxxx xxxx xx xxxxxxxxx xx xxxxxx xxxxxxxx 1
: xxx xxxxxxxxxxxxx xx xxxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx x xxx :
XXXXXXX XXX XXXXX*^(XXXXX XXXXX XXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXXXXXXXX ;
xxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxx^femj^x xxx xx xxxxxxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxxxx xxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxx xxxx xxxx^x^mxxxxx xxxxxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxx xxx xxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxx xx xxxxxxx xxx JLJI "-Jiji juPDai ILJIJL xxxxxx xx xxxx xxx xxxxx xxx xxxxx xxx xxxxx
Site Responsibility:
xxxxxx xxx xxxxx :
xxxxxx xxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxx
NPL Listing History
Proposed XX/XX/XX
Final. XX/XX/XX
Threats and Contaminants
XXXXXX XXX XXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XX XXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXX XXX XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXX XXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX XX XXXXXX XXXX
XXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXX XXXXXX XXXXXX XXXXX XXXXXX
XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXX X XXX XX
XXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXX
Cleanup Approach
xxxxxx xxx xxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XX XXXXXXXXX XX XXXXXX XXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXX XXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX XX XXXXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXX X XXX XXXXXXXX
Response Action Status
xxxxxx xxx xxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxx :
XXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XX XXXXXXXXX XX :
XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXX XXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX XX XXXXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXX X :
XXXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXX XXXXXX XXXXXX XXXXX XXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX :
XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX-iX XXXXXXXXX XXXX X XXX XX XXXXXXXXX XXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXX
XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXX XXXX XXXXX XXX
XXX XXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX XX XXXXXXX XXX XXXXXX XX XXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXX :
Site Facts:
XXXXXX XXX XXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XX XXXXXXXXX XX XXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXX XXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX XX XXXXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXX X XXX
xxx xxxxxx
Environmental Progress
xxxxxx xxx xxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxx
XXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XX XXXXXXXXX XX XXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXX
XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXX XXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX XX XXXXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXX X XXX XXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXX XXXXXX XXXXXX XXX XXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX
Site Repository
XXXXXX XXX XXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX
SITE REPOSITORY
Lists the location of the primary site repository. The site
repository may include community relations plans, public
meeting announcements and minutes, fact sheets, press
releases, and other site-related documents.
-------
SITE DESCRIPTION
This section describes the location and history of the site. It includes descrip-
tions of the most recent activities and past actions at the site that have con-
tributed to the contamination. Population estimates, land usages, and nearby
resources give readers background on the local setting surrounding the site.
THREATS AND CONTAMINANTS
The major chemical categories of site contamination are noted, as well as
which environmental resources are affected. Icons representing each of the
affected resources (may include air, groundwater, surface water, soil, and
contamination to environmentally sensitive areas) are included in the margins
of this section. Potential threats to residents and the surrounding environ-
ments arising from the site contamination also are described.
CLEANUP APPROACH
This section contains a brief overview of how the site is being cleaned up.
RESPONSE ACTION STATUS
Specific actions that have been accomplished or will be undertaken to clean
up the site are described here. Cleanup activities at NPL sites are divided
into separate phases, depending on the complexity and required actions at the
site. Two major types of cleanup activities often are described: initial,
immediate, or emergency actions to quickly remove or reduce imminent
threats to the community and surrounding areas; and long-term remedial
phases directed at final cleanup at the site. Each stage of the cleanup strategy
is presented in this section of the summary. Icons representing the stage of
the cleanup process (initial actions, site investigations, EPA selection of the
cleanup remedy, engineering design phase, cleanup activities underway, and
completed cleanup) are located in the margin next to each activity descrip-
tion.
SITE FACTS
Additional information on activities and events at the site are included in this
section. Often details on legal or administrative actions taken by the EPA to
achieve site cleanup or other facts pertaining to community involvement with
the site cleanup process are reported here.
-------
Guide to the NPL Book Icons
The "icons," or symbols, accompanying the text allow the reader to see at a glance which envi-
ronmental resources are affected and the status of cleanup activities at the site.
Icons in the Threats
and Contaminants
Section
Icons in the Response
Action Status Section
Contaminated Groundwater re-
sources in the vicinity or underlying
the site. (Groundwater is often used
as a drinking water source.)
Contaminated Surface Water and
Sediments on or near the site.
(These include lakes, ponds,
streams, and rivers.)
Contaminated Air in the vicinity of
the site. (Air pollution usually is
periodic and involves contaminated
dust particles or hazardous gas
emissions.)
Contaminated Soil and Sludges on
or near the site. (This contamination
category may include bulk or other
surface hazardous wastes found on
the site.)
Threatened or contaminated Envi-
ronmentally Sensitive Areas in the
vicinity of the site. (Examples
include wetlands and coastal areas
or critical habitats.)
Initial, Immediate, or Emergency
Actions have been taken or are
underway to eliminate immediate
threats at the site.
Site Studies at the site to determine
the nature and extent of contamina-
tion are planned or underway.
Remedy Selected indicates that site
investigations have been concluded,
and the EPA has selected a final
cleanup remedy for the site or part
of the site.
Remedy Design means that engi-
neers are preparing specifications
and drawings for the selected
cleanup technologies.
Cleanup Ongoing indicates that the
selected cleanup remedies for the
contaminated site, or part of the site,
currently are underway.
Cleanup Complete shows that all
cleanup goals have been achieved
for the contaminated site or part of
the site.
-------
EPA ID
Number Site Name
KSD007241656 29TH & MEAD GROUND WATER CONTAMINATION
KSD981710247 57TH AND NORTH BROADWAY STREETS SITE
KSD980500789 ARKANSAS CITY DUMP
KSD980686174 BIG RIVER SAND CO
KSD031349624 CHEMICAL COMMODITIES, INC.
KSD980741862 CHEROKEE COUNTY
KSD980632301 DOEPKE DISPOSAL (HOLLIDAY)
KS6214020756 FORT RILEY
KSD0071 35429 HYDRO-FLEX CORPORATION, INC.
KSD980631980 JOHNS' SLUDGE POND
KSD980631766 OBEE ROAD
KSD000829846 PESTER REFINERY CO.
KSD980862726 STROTHER FIELD INDUSTRIAL PARK
-------
29TH & MEAD
GROUND WATE
CONTAMINATIO
KANSAS
EPA ID# KSD007241656
REGION 7
wick County
Wichita
Site Description
The 29th & Mead Ground Water Contamination site covers approximately 1,440 acres at the
intersection of 29th and Mead Streets in a highly industrialized area of Wichita. Studies
conducted from 1983 to 1986 by the Kansas Department of Health and the Environment (KDHE)
and the U.S. Geological Survey confirmed heavy metals and organic contamination in shallow
wells on and around the site. The actual boundary and the extent of ground water contamination
have not been clearly defined. There are several potential industrial sources of contamination in
the area that include facilities currently in operation and facilities that have ceased operations. An
estimated 3,300 people obtain drinking water from public and private wells drawing from the
shallow aquifer within 3 miles of the site.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal, State, and potentially
responsible parties' actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 06/24/88
Final Date: 02/21/90
Threats and Contaminants
The ground water and soil are contaminated with volatile organic compounds (VOCs)
including trichloroethylene (TCE), carbon tetrachloride, toluene, and vinyl chloride.
People who come in direct contact with or ingest contaminated ground water may be
at risk. Also, the contamination on site could pollute Chisholm Creek, which is used
for recreational purposes.
December 1994
-------
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in two long-term remedial phases focusing on cleanup of the entire
site and the Coleman area.
Response Action Status
Entire Site: The parties potentially responsible for the ground water contamination
are carrying out an investigation to determine the nature and extent of contamination
and to identify cleanup alternatives. The investigation is expected to be completed by
1995.
Coleman Area: In 1991, the potentially responsible party began an investigation to
determine the nature and extent of soil and ground water contamination and to
identify cleanup alternatives at the Coleman area. The primary contaminant at this
location is TCE. A remedy to address cleanup was selected in late 1992 and includes: ground
water pump and treatment, air stripping, and soil vapor extraction. Design of the remedy began
in 1994. Cleanup is scheduled to begin in 1995.
Site Facts: The Kansas Department of Health and the Environment (KDHE) has identified more
than 70 parties potentially responsible for the wastes associated with ground water contamination
at and in the vicinity of the site. In 1987, the parties organized a steering committee to negotiate
future investigations and cleanup activities. In 1989, the steering committee signed a Consent
Agreement with the KDHE to complete an investigation of the site. KDHE has signed several
coordinate and cooperate type Administrative Orders with additional parties to investigate areas of
potential sources that may contribute to the ground water plume.
Environmental Progress
While cleanup investigations for the entire site continue, the EPA has determined that the site
currently does not pose an immediate threat to the neighboring communities or the environment
as long as the contaminated wells are not used.
Site Repository
KDHE, District Office, 1919 Amidon, Wichita, KS 67203
December 1 994 2 29TH & MEAD GROUND
WATER CONTAMINATION
-------
57TH AND NORTH
BROADWAY
SITE
KANSAS
EPA ID# KSD981710247
EPA REGION 7
Sedgewick County
ichita Heights, near Wichita
Site Description
The 57th and North Broadway Streets site is a 180-acre area that is both residential and
commercial. The sources of contamination in this area are close to the intersection of these two
streets. Local and State officials were first alerted to the presence of contamination in 1983 when
a resident complained about the poor quality of the drinking water. Subsequent investigations led
to the detection of contamination in the soil, and in residential and industrial wells. In 1989, the
Kansas Department of Health and the Environment (KDHE) identified four parties potentially
responsible for site contamination in 1989: an oil refining plant, a trucking company, an
abandoned gas station, and an abandoned paint factory which generated paint sludge and cooling
water. Other sources of contamination may have originated from local tire companies, trucking
companies, and gas stations as well as an area landfill. The Derby Costal Pipeline, which
transects the site, potentially contributed to the site contamination.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal and State actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 02/07/92
Final Date: 10/14/92
Threats and Contaminants
Volatile organic compounds (VOCs), including benzene, toluene, and xylene, and
heavy metals, including arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, and lead, have been
detected in on-site soil and residential and industrial wells. Exposure to contaminated
soils or ground water could pose a health risk.
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in two stages: immediate actions and one long-term remedial phase
focusing on cleanup of the entire site.
November 1 994
-------
Response Action Status
Immediate Actions: In 1990, the EPA provided bottled water to residents and
small businesses affected by site contamination. A water supply line was constructed
in 1992.
Entire Site: An investigation into the nature and extent of groundwater contamination
at the site began in 1994. Once the investigation is completed, scheduled for 1996, the
EPA will select remedies for final cleanup of the site.
Environmental Progress
Immediate actions such as the provision of bottled water and the construction of a water supply
line to affected residences and small businesses have reduced the risks posed to the safety and
health of the nearby population while investigations are being completed by the EPA. Hook-ups
to the new water system are being arranged and financed by private companies in the Wichita
Heights area.
Site Repository
Not established.
November 1 994
57TH AND NORTH BROADWAY
STREETS SITE
-------
ARKANSAS
CITY DUMP
KANSAS
EPA ID# KSD98050078&
EPA REGION 7
Cowley County
n southwest Arkansas City,
3 112 miles north of the
Oklahoma State Line
Other Names:
Millikin Refinery
Site Description
The Arkansas City Dump is a 200-acre site in southwestern Arkansas City. From 1916 until the
mid-1920s, an oil refinery on site created an acidic sludge waste. Operators disposed of about V/i
million cubic feet of sludge in the northern waste area. Municipal wastes were disposed of at the
site after an explosion and fire in 1927 destroyed the oil refinery. Between 500,000 and 1 million
gallons of residual oil product from the refinery operation were present in the subsurface soils
which contain polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Much of the organic contamination
was related to the release of petroleum products and could not be addressed under the Superfund
program because the Superfund "Petroleum Exclusion" excludes cleanup of petroleum products.
In addition, the organic contaminants do not present a threat to public health or the environment.
The remainder of the wastes at the site consisted of domestic and municipal solid wastes. These
wastes also do not appear to present a threat to public health or the environment. The site lies
within the 100-year flood plain of the Arkansas River and is separated from the river by a levee.
The surrounding land includes commercial and residential areas. Approximately 6,500 people live
within a 3-mile radius of the site. About 60 homes are located within V4 mile of the eastern
boundary. A city park lies to the west, and several nearby businesses employ up to 100 people.
There were no known or suspected uses of groundwater at or near the site. Municipal drinking
water, which is available to all homes or gullys near the site, is obtained from a well field on the
other side of the Arkansas River, upriver of this site. The drinking water supply was not at risk
of contamination by this site. All cleanup has been completed at the site.
Site Responsibility:
This site was addressed through
Federal actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 10/23/81
Final Date: 09/08/83
Threats and Contaminants
The undisturbed sludge contained sulfuric acid, significant concentrations of PAHs,
other organics, heavy metals, amonia and sulfur which could have been toxic to
humans if exposed. Contaminants were not detected in the Arkansas River.
Groundwater and sediments are contaminated with oil, but do not pose a risk to the
public or environment. No drinking water wells were at risk of contamination.
December 1994
-------
Cleanup Approach
Response Action Status
Groundwater and Sediments: By 1991, the EPA had assessed the oil-
contaminated sediments and groundwater, and determined that they did not pose a
threat. Therefore, no further cleanup action was selected for these areas.
Source Control: In 1988, the EPA selected a remedy for the northern waste area
to clean up acidic sludges by neutralizing them with high pH materials and covering
the area with soil after treatment was complete. Cleanup began in 1991 and was
completed in 1992.
Site Facts: The EPA lacks jurisdiction to clean up petroleum-related problems under the
Superfund program due to the "Petroleum Exclusion" clause in the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA).
Environmental Progress
All construction has been completed at the Arkansas City Dump site and the EPA is considering
the site for deletion.
Site Repository
Arkansas City Public Library, 120 E. Fifth Ave., Arkansas City, KS 67005
December 1994
ARKANSAS CITY DUMP
-------
BIG RIVER
COMPANY
KANSAS
EPA ID# KSD980686174
EPA REGION 7
Sedgwick County
Wichita
Site Description
The Big River Sand Company site is a 123-acre sand and gravel mining operation that lies l/i
mile west of the Arkansas River and next to the Wichita Valley Center Floodway. The western
half of the site has been, and continues to be, extensively mined. The eastern half belongs to the
former owner of the entire property. During the 1970s, roughly 2,000 drums of paint-related
waste were disposed of on the site, next to a 5-acre sand quarry lake. In 1978, the Big River
Sand Company bought 80 acres of the site and, in 1982, under the sales agreement and a court
order, the previous owner started moving the drums to his side of the property. Nearly 200
drums had been transferred before the Kansas Department of Health the and Environment
(KDHE) stopped the action. The facility was not licensed to store or dispose of the waste and
on-site workers did not use protective equipment. The State's intervention in 1982 showed that
drums on site were damaged, corroded, and leaking. Waste solvents and paint sludges from
several drums contained metals and volatile organic compounds (VOCs), which were flammable.
In 1984, the State and the property owner completed a surface cleanup. All paint wastes were
taken off site, as were about 2,000 barrels and four large solvent storage tanks. State analysts
found solvents and heavy metals in nearby residential wells in 1982 and 1984. Approximately 25
homes lie within 1/4 mile to the west of the property. Two offices and three homes are located
on the site's southern edge. An estimated 1,000 people draw drinking water from wells within a
3-mile radius of the site. Groundwater also is used for crop irrigation and industrial processes.
Site Responsibility:
This site was being addressed through
Federal and State actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 10/15/84
Final Date: 06/10/86
Deleted Date: 10/14/92
Threats and Contaminants
This site presents no significant threat to human health or the environment, since
cleanup actions and natural processes have reduced contaminant levels; however,
people using private wells in the area should be advised that the natural levels of iron,
manganese, and selenium in their wells are higher than State and Federal standards
recommend.
November 1994
-------
Cleanup Approach
Response Action Status
Immediate Actions: In 1984, under a state order, a party potentially responsible
for site contamination cleaned up surface contamination at the site.
Entire Site: After an intensive study of the site in 1988 and consultation with the
State of Kansas, the EPA determined that no further actions were required for the Big
River Sand Company site at this time.
Site Facts: The State ordered a potentially responsible party to conduct cleanup of surface
contamination in September 1982.
Environmental Progress
After intensive investigations, the EPA and the State determined that the Big River Sand
Company site does not pose a threat to the community or the environment. The site was deleted
from the NPL on October 14, 1992.
Site Repository
Wichita Public Library, 223 S. Main Street, Wichita, KS 67202
November 1994
BIG RIVER SAND COMPANY
-------
CHEMICAL
COMMODITIES
KANSAS
EPA ID# KSD031349624
EPA REGION 7
Johnson County
Olathe
Site Description
The Chemical Commodities Inc. (CCI) site is located in a commercial and residential area of
central Olathe, a suburb of Kansas City. The CCI site occupies approximately IVi acres and
borders the Burlington Northern railroad right-of-way, a vacant lot, and single family residences.
CCI is an inactive chemical recycling facility that handled, stored, repackaged, and distributed a
variety of chemicals. Before 1951, the site was occupied by an ice manufacturer. CCI operated
the facility from 1951 to 1989. In 1980, CCI acquired a Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act (RCRA) permit allowing the facility to generate and transport hazardous waste. During the
facility's operation, poor housekeeping, inappropriate material handling and storage practices,
and facility conditions that allowed materials to migrate off site were documented. Concerns for
public health and the environment were raised during the facility's operation due to emanating
odors, contaminated rain water runoff from the site, and fires. Investigations by CCI, the Kansas
Department of Health and Environment, and the EPA have indicated that soil and groundwater
are contaminated with a wide range of metals, volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds
(VOCs), and pesticides. Other substances have migrated off site via air and surface water runoff.
A covered mound of excavated, contaminated soil is also present at the site. Approximately
60,000 people live in the city of Olathe; about 7,100 live within one mile of the site.
Groundwater is not used as a source of municipal drinking water; however, private wells are
found within 3 miles of the site.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal and potentially responsible
party's actions.
ISIPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 01/18/94
Final Date: 05/31/94
Threats and Contaminants
The soil and groundwater are contaminated with the following: various metals,
including chromium; VOCs and semi-VOCs, such as trichloroethylene (TCE), carbon
tetrachloride, and tetrachloroethylene; and pesticides. Groundwater also is
contaminated with high concentrations of halogenated organic compounds. High
concentrations of two hazardous wastes found in the soil were detected in an air sample
collected downwind of the site. The site is secured to limit public access. Ingesting or
touching contaminated soil or groundwater could pose a public health threat. Inhaling
contaminated air is also a risk.
November 1 994
-------
Cleanup Approach ——
The site is being addressed in two stages: immediate actions and a long-term remedial phase
focusing on cleaning up the entire site.
Response Action Status
Immediate Actions: In 1989 the EPA began to dispose of chemicals and
contaminated soil, decontaminate buildings, and assess and treat groundwater
contamination. An interceptor trench was constructed to capture contaminated water
from the groundwater table. The groundwater is then treated on-site prior to discharge.
Entire Site: The EPA is planning to begin an intensive investigation into the nature
and extent of contamination at the site. Final cleanup actions will address subsurface
soil and further groundwater contamination.
Environmental Progress
After investigating the site, EPA determined that the groundwater poses no immediate threat to
the community due to its limited use. In addition, disposing of chemicals and contaminated soil,
decontaminating buildings, and assessing and treating groundwater contamination has eliminated
any likely threats while investigations leading to final cleanup of the site are underway.
Site Repository
Olathe City Library, 201 E. Park Street, Olathe, KS 66061
November 1994
CHEMICAL COMMODITIES, INC.
-------
CHEROKEE
COUNTY
KANSAS
EPA ID# KSD98074186?
EPA REGION 7
Cherokee County
Galena
Other Names:
Tar Creek Area Site
Tri-State Mining District
Tar Creek-Cherokee County
Site Description
The Cherokee County site is a mining area covering about 110 square miles. It is part of a larger
area sometimes called the Tri-State Mining District, which encompasses Cherokee County in
Kansas, Jasper County in Missouri, and Ottawa County in Oklahoma. One hundred years of
widespread lead and zinc mining created piles of mine tailings, covering 4,000 acres in
southeastern Cherokee County alone. The mine tailings, containing lead, zinc, and cadmium,
have leached into the shallow groundwater. Runoff from the waste piles also moves contaminants
into nearby streams. The EPA has divided this site into six subsites that correspond to six general
mining locations. Cleanup work is further along at the Galena subsite, hi the east-central portion
of the entire site, than at the other subsites. This 25-square-mile area has large tracts of mine and
mill wastes, water-filled craters where the ground has collapsed, open mineshafts, and pits.
Wastes have affected the quality of the shallow groundwater, a primary drinking source for the
residents of the area, and the surface water. Several heavy metals were found in water samples
from private wells. Surrounding lands are used for residences, business, light industry, farming,
and grazing. Of the 22,320 people living in Cherokee County, 3,600 of them reside in Galena.
Galena's city water does not contain contaminants. Another 1,100 residents live outside the town
and depend on groundwater from the contaminated aquifer for drinking supplies.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal and potentially responsible
parties' actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 12/30/82
Final Date: 09/08/83
Threats and Contaminants
Radon gas from the mining operations has been detected in the air around the Galena
subsite. Private wells in Galena contain lead, cadmium, selenium, zinc, and
chromium. Acidic waters in mine shafts throughout the site, tailing piles and surface
waters in the mine pits, and streams across the site contain significant concentrations
of lead, zinc, and cadmium. Risks to public health include accidentally ingesting soil
or mine wastes; inhaling contaminated household dust; stirring up and inhaling
metal-laden dusts while motorbiking on the tailings piles; touching contaminated soils,
wastes, or surface waters; or ingesting contaminated surface waters, foodstuffs, or
groundwater. Acid mine drainage containing dissolved heavy metals contributes to the
transport of heavy metals into the Spring River, Short Creek, and Shoal Creek;
analysts have found contamination in fish from local surface waters. Polluted mine
water also surfaces hi Oklahoma's Tar Creek.
December 1994
-------
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in six stages: immediate actions and five long-term remedial phases
directed at an alternate water supply; cleanup of the Spring River, Treece, and Baxter Springs
subsites; and cleanup of the Galena groundwater and surface water.
Response Action Status
Immediate Actions: The EPA installed water treatment units on eight
contaminated wells in Galena in 1986. In 1987, the EPA conducted a county-wide
study of wells and a water supply monitoring program for public and private sources
of water. This study showed that two more homes needed the treatment units. These units were
installed, and along with the other units, continue to be maintained by the EPA.
Alternate Water Supply: The EPA selected an approach for supplying an alternate
source of water to Galena in 1987. It features: collecting clean groundwater through
existing wells owned by the City; distributing that water through a pipeline network to
the houses, businesses, and farms within the subsite, but outside the municipal water system;
rehabilitating two wells needed for the project; and drilling a new well if the existing ones cannot
be fixed. The remedy also includes construction and equipment necessary to establish an alternate
water supply to the area. Based on public comments, the EPA decided to amend the cleanup
actions to include construction of two deep aquifer wells to collect water and two water storage
tanks. These wells will be maintained and operated independently of the City of Galena.
Construction of the two deep aquifer wells and the two water storage tanks was completed in
1992. Water line easement acquisition activities began in 1991 and were completed in 1993.
Spring River Subsite: The Spring River runs through all of the other subsites and
will be handled appropriately, pursuant to each respective subsite cleanup plan.
Treece Subsite: The EPA initiated investigation activities at the Treece subsite in
1988. The parties potentially responsible for contamination of this area took over the
study in early 1990. This investigation is exploring the nature and extent of soil and
water pollution at the subsite and will recommend the best strategies for final cleanup. The
investigation was completed in the summer of 1994, and a remedy is expected to be selected in
late 1994.
Baxter Springs Subsite: The EPA initiated an investigation at the Baxter Springs
subsite in 1987. The parties potentially responsible for contamination of this area took
over the study in conjunction with the Treece investigation in early 1990. This study
is exploring the nature and extent of soil and water pollution at the subsite and will recommend
the best strategies for final cleanup. As with the Treece subsite, a remedy is scheduled for
selection hi late 1994.
December 1994 2 CHEROKEE COUNTY
-------
Galena Groundwater and Surface Water: In 1989, the EPA, with the agreement
of the State, selected a remedy for cleaning up the ground water and surface water in
the Galena subsite. It includes: removing and selectively placing mine waste below the
ground surface; diverting surface streams away from the contaminants; recontouring the land
surface to control runoff and erosion; and investigating deep aquifer wells. The investigation and
design of activities have been completed. Implementation of cleanup activities began in June
1993 and involved plugging four wells and cleaning up one well. The site clean up was
completed in late 1994.
Site Facts: The EPA issued a Unilateral Administrative Order to the potentially responsible
parties in May 1990 to design the groundwater and surface water cleanup activities at the Galena
subsite. However, the EPA assumed control of the remedy design in July 1990, because the
parties failed to comply with the Order.
Environmental Progress
The alternate water supply for the Galena subsite has been completed and a rural water district
was formed. Approximately 450 homes have been connected to the system. Cleanup of the
surface mine wastes in Galena has been completed. These activities have reduced the potential
for exposure to contaminants while cleanup investigations are underway.
Site Repository
Galena Public Library, 315 W. Seventh, Galena, KS 66739
CHEROKEE COUNTY
December 1994
-------
DOEPKE
DISPOSAL
(HOLLIDAY)
KANSAS
EPA ID# KSD980632301
EPA REGION 7
Johnson County
outhern bluffs of the Kansas River
Valley
Other Names:
Doepke-Holliday Site
Site Description
Between 1963 and 1970, the 80-acre Doepke Disposal (Holliday) site operated as a private
industrial and commercial landfill and accepted unknown quantities of wastes such as paint
sludges, solvents, pesticides, metal sludges, and fiberglass resins. Liquids seeping from the site
flow through a culvert under Holliday Drive into the Kansas River. In the early 1960s, many
wastes were burned and buried. Liquids were later stored in ponds on the site. In 1966, with
County approval, 374 drums of various pesticides and solvents were placed with fire debris in a
trench. When the State closed the site in 1970, it was covered and terraced. Approximately 150
people live within a mile of the site, and 2,500 live within 3 miles. Residents of Johnson County
get drinking water from 21 wells in the Kansas River alluvial aquifer and from a river intake
about 3/4 mile downstream of the site; 200,000 people are served by these systems. About 30
wells lie within 3 miles; the nearest is 1/2 mile away. Contaminants are not migrating off site in
large enough concentrations to affect water quality in the Kansas River.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal and potentially responsible
parties' actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 12/30/82
Final Date: 09/08/83
Threats and Contaminants
The groundwater, soil, and leachate are contaminated with volatile organic compounds
(VOCs), pesticides, polychlor mated biphenyls (PCBs), poly cyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons (PAHs), and heavy metals from former waste disposal activities.
Subsurface soils and wastes contain significant concentrations of contaminants and
could threaten people working or trespassing on the site. On-site contaminated
groundwater is not being used, so exposure to contaminants is unlikely.
November 1994
-------
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in a long-term remedial phase focusing on cleanup of the entire site.
Response Action Status
Entire Site: The EPA selected a remedy for this site in 1989 featuring: removal and
off-site treatment of contaminated liquids currently ponded underground in the area
of the former surface impoundments; construction of an impermeable multi-layer cap
over the majority of the waste disposal area; collection and, if necessary, off-site treatment of
significant groundwater seepage; extended groundwater monitoring of the effectiveness of the
remedy; and deed and access restrictions. The potentially responsible parties have completed a
pre-design hydrogeological study and the final design was approved by EPA on May 25, 1993.
Site Facts: In 1987, Deffenbaugh Industries, Inc. entered into a Consent Agreement with the
EPA to study site contamination and to develop cleanup options. An Administrative Order on
Consent was signed with the potentially responsible parties in 1990 to design the remedy for the
site.
Environmental Progress
Following the listing of this site on the NPL, the EPA completed a site assessment and
determined that the Doepke Disposal (Holliday) site poses no immediate threat to public health or
the environment while site cleanup activities are being planned.
Site Repository
Johnson County Public Library, 8700 West 63rd Street, Merriam, KS 66201
November 1994
DOEPKE DISPOSAL (HOLLIDAY)
-------
FORT RILEY
KANSAS
EPA ID# KS6214020756
EPA REGION 7
Geary County and Riley County
Near Junction City
Site Description
The Fort Riley site is a 152-square-mile U.S. Army base. Fort Riley, established in 1853, has
been a major fort since the Civil War. Its operations are diverse and involve seven landfills,
numerous motor pools, burn and firefighting pit areas, hospitals, pesticide and mixing areas, dry
cleaners, and shops. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs), pesticides, waste motor oils,
chlorinated solvents, and mercury were deposited in landfills above and below the water table and
were spilled or dumped on the ground near buildings. The most serious problems are
groundwater contamination resulting from past operations at the former sanitary landfill at Camp
Funston, groundwater contamination resulting from past and present operations at adjacent dry
cleaning facilities in the Main Post cantonment area, and pesticide residues in soils in a
maintenance yard in the Main Post area. Investigations in 1992 found vinyl chloride and other
VOCs in shallow monitoring wells in proximity to the former Camp Funston Landfill.
Groundwater along the Republican and Kansas Rivers is the sole source of drinking water for
Fort Riley, Ogden, and Junction City. Fort Riley water supply wells are located approximately
3/4 mile upgradient of the dry cleaning facilities where tetrachloroethylene (PCE) was detected in
groundwater sampling conducted in mid-1992. Municipal and Army wells within 3 miles of the
base provide drinking water for approximately 47,800 people. Groundwater also is used for crop
irrigation. People use the Kansas River along the site property for recreational activities.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 07/14/89
Final Date: 08/30/90
Threats and Contaminants
m
Monitoring wells in proximity to the former Camp Funston Landfill are contaminated
with vinyl chloride and other VOCs. PCE has been detected in groundwater at the
dry cleaning facility sites. The dry cleaning facilities are located downgradient of the
Fort Riley well field. Groundwater near the installation boundary at the Marshall
Army Airfield has been found contaminated with VOCs due to the operations of a
former fire training pit. Landfill debris are reported to contain waste oils and
degreasing solvents. The landfill is located within the flood plain of the Kansas
River. Touching or ingesting contaminated groundwater or soil could pose a health
risk.
December 1994
-------
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in four stages: cleanup of the former Camp Funston Landfill, the
former Pesticide Storage Facility, the Dry Cleaning Facilities, and other areas of contamination.
Response Action Status
Camp Funston Landfill: An investigation into the nature and extent of
contamination at the landfill was completed in mid-1994. An interim response action
to stabilize the bank of the Kansas River along the landfill was completed in early
1994. An additional interim action to provide improvements to the surface cover of the landfill is
expected to begin in late 1994. Investigations are expected to be completed in 1995.
Pesticide Storage Facility: An investigation into the nature and extent of
contamination was completed in mid-1993. An interim response action to excavate
and dispose of contaminated soils at the site was begun in early 1994. The
investigation is expected to be completed in 1996 and will evaluate whether any further response
actions will be required to complete cleanup of the former pesticide storage facility.
Dry Cleaning Facilities: An investigation to define the extent of groundwater
contamination and better define site geology is underway and scheduled for
completion in late 1996. A soil vapor extraction (SVE) system and a groundwater
extraction system have been installed at the site as part of a pilot study. If the systems can be
operated successfully, this interim cleanup action will be constructed.
Other Areas: Investigations into the nature of contamination of other areas of site
contamination began in the summer of 1993. Investigations have been prioritized
such that the areas posing the greatest potential risk will be addressed first. As a
result, lead-contaminated soils from a former firing range near an on-post housing area were
excavated, stabilized, and disposed of off-post. Further, a soil vapor and groundwater extraction
system pilot study will be evaluated at the Marshall Army Airfield VOC site. Investigations to
identify the need for further response measures are planned through 1995.
Site Facts: Fort Riley is participating in the Installation Restoration Program, a specially funded
program established by the Department of Defense (DOD) in 1978 to identify, investigate, and
control the migration of hazardous contaminants at military and other DOD facilities.
Environmental Progress
The EPA and the Army have agreed to use the Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM)
approach, to the extent practical, to address short-term cleanup objectives at the Fort Riley site.
Several interim cleanup actions have been implemented based on this strategy, with the
opportunity for additional actions to be completed in the near future.
December 1994 2 FORT RILEY
-------
Site Repository
Manhattan Public Library, Juliette and Poyntz, Manhattan, KS 66502
FORT RILEY
December 1994
-------
HYDRO-FLEX
KANSAS
EPA ID# KSD0071 35429
EPA REGION 7
Shawnee County
Topeka
Site Description
Since 1970, Hydro-Flex Inc. has manufactured specialized tubing, hoses, heat exchangers, and
fittings at this 3-acre site. From 1970 to 1981, operators discharged rinse water and sludges from
a chromate metal finishing bath through a septic tank and into a series of buried silos. Wastes
also were discharged into the on-site injection well. These open-ended vertical shafts were filled
with porous fill material and penetrated to within 2 feet of an aquifer, the sole source of drinking
water in the area. Operators discharged a maximum of 320 gallons per day to the silos and
periodically allowed the overflow of wastes from the third silo onto neighboring cropland. These
techniques were abandoned when municipal sewers became available in 1981. The silos were
filled with sand and covered with earth. In 1987, the Kansas Department of Health and the
Environment (KDHE) detected process-related metals in on-site wells. A 1989 site visit showed
that access to the site was unrestricted, but tall grass had covered the disposal areas and they
appeared untouched for some time. The only evidence of the past disposal practice is distressed
plant growth and discolored soils over the three areas. Approximately 30 people live within a 1-
mile radius of the site, many in older residences that pre-date the industrial zoning of the area.
Approximately 6,500 people obtain drinking water from public and private wells within 3 miles
of the site. The Kansas River and Soldier Creek are within a 1-mile radius of the site, and
Topeka's surface water intake on the Kansas River is located about a mile to the south. Two
public water supply wells lie about \l/i miles northeast of the site.
Site Responsibility:
This site was addressed through
Federal, State, and potentially
responsible parties' actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 06/24/88
Final Date: 03/31/89
Deleted Date: 11/09/93
Threats and Contaminants
Groundwater both on and off the site and soil contained low levels of various heavy
metals. The chief threat to public health from this site was ingesting contaminated
groundwater and soil.
November 1994
-------
Cleanup Approach
Response Action Status
Entire Site: Under State monitoring, the parties potentially responsible for site
contamination conducted an investigation to determine the nature and extent of
contamination and any needed strategies for final site cleanup. Upon completion of the
investigation, the EPA determined that the site did not pose a threat to public health or the
environment. The site was deleted from the NPL in November 1993.
Environmental Progress
The EPA determined that the Hydro-Flex Inc. site did not pose a threat to public health or the
environment.
Site Repository
Contact the Region 7 Super fund Community Relations Office.
November 1994
HYDRO-FLEX INC.
-------
JOHNS' SLU
KANSAS
EPA ID# KSD980631980
EPA REGION 7
Sedgwick County
Wichita
Other Names:
Johns' Oil Sludge Pit
Site Description
The Johns' Sludge Pond site covers lh. acre and is located in an industrialized area in northern
Wichita. From 1951 to 1970, Super Refined Oil, which no longer is in business, recycled waste
oil and disposed of an estimated 7,000 cubic yards of oily sludge into an unlined pond. The
principal hazard associated with the site was the acidity of the sludge and the water lying above
it. Historically, the site would overflow periodically during periods of heavy rainfall, releasing its
contents to the surrounding surface waters. Most of the site was owned by the Johns' Estate. The
City of Wichita condemned the remainder of the site in the 1970s to provide drainage along the
adjacent highway and, as a result, owns the remainder of the property. A drainage ditch adjacent
to the site carries surface water from the site to Chisholm Creek, 1 l/i miles downgradient of the
site. Chisholm Creek flows into a concrete ditch receiving runoff from the adjacent highway and
empties into the Arkansas River to the south of the city. Fishing takes place in a borrow pit
located adjacent to the site. Currently, there are no wells at or near the site used for drinking.
Site Responsibility:
This site was addressed through
Federal and municipal actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 12/30/82
Final Date: 09/08/83
Deleted Date: 01/06/92
Threats and Contaminants
Before cleanup, the site contained highly acidic sludge, topped by acidic water. The
EPA found heavy metals including lead, as well as volatile organic compounds
(VOCs), and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in groundwater on the site. Site sludge
and surface water was highly acidic and contained PCBs and heavy metals, including
aluminum, lead, chromium, and zinc. Site cleanup activities have alleviated the
potential harm to public health and the environment.
December 1994
-------
Cleanup Approach
Response Action Status
Initial Actions: Under EPA oversight, the City of Wichita's Department of Public
Works removed sludge from the impoundment and stockpiled it on the adjacent
ground surface; installed a compacted clay soil liner on the bottom and sidewalls of
the empty impoundment; solidified stockpiled sludge with cement kiln dust; re-deposited the
sludge in the lined disposal cell; constructed a compacted clay cap above the solidified sludge;
and covered the cap with soil and vegetation. Deed restrictions were placed on the property,
preventing land uses that would interfere with the effectiveness of these actions. The site was
fenced to prevent dirt bike riding and other activities that could damage the cap and cover, and
no-trespassing signs were posted. The EPA decided to install additional monitoring wells to
determine the direction of groundwater flow and the nature and degree of contamination, if any,
of downgradient groundwater. Sedgwick County and the City of Wichita continue to conduct
monitoring and maintenance of the cap and vegetative cover.
Entire Site: In 1989, the EPA, in consultation with the State of Kansas, determined
that no further cleanup actions were required for the Johns' Sludge Pond. The EPA
found that the initial actions already conducted at the site by the City of Wichita are
protective of public health and the environment. The site was deleted from the NPL in January
of 1992.
Site Facts: In 1983, the EPA issued a Consent Order to the City of Wichita, requiring the City
to submit a site cleanup plan for the EPA's approval. An interim cleanup plan was submitted,
approved, and implemented. The EPA evaluated the adequacy of the interim cleanup and, in
1989, determined that no further action was required at the site, except for continued site
monitoring and maintenance.
Environmental Progress
The cleanup actions performed by the City of Wichita have eliminated the potential for exposure
to hazardous substances at the Johns' Sludge Pond site. The EPA determined that no further
cleanup actions were needed and that the site no longer posed a threat to human health or the
environment. The John's Sludge Pond site was deleted from the NPL on January 1, 1992.
However, Sedgwick County and the City of Wichita continue to monitor the site to ensure long-
term effectiveness of the initial cleanup actions.
Site Repository
Wichita City Hall, 455 N. Main, Wichita, KS 67202
December 1994 2 JOHNS' SLUDGE POND
-------
OBEE ROAD
KANSAS
EPA ID# KSD980631766I
EPA REGION 7
Reno County
Obeeville
Other Names:
Hutchison City Dump
Site Description
The Obee Road site is a plume of contaminated groundwater located in Obeeville. An
investigation in 1983 by the Kansas Department of Health and Environment (KDHE) was
prompted by a citizen's concern over the taste and odor of his well water. Sampling by the
KDHE showed volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the shallow aquifer. The source of the
contamination is suspected to be an old city landfill on the eastern edge of the Hutchinson
Municipal Airport. Before closing in 1973, the landfill accepted unknown quantities of liquid
wastes and sludges from local industries, as well as solvents from small metal-finishing
operations at local aircraft plants. The landfill now is covered with vegetation. Septic tank
systems hi the area are another potential source of contamination. Approximately 1,900 people hi
Obeeville obtained drinking water from private wells that drew water from the contaminated
aquifer before alternate water sources were provided. The area around the site is rural; some
residents have farm animals on their property.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal, State, and potentially
responsible parties' actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 01/22/87
Final Date: 07/22/87
Threats and Contaminants
Groundwater is contaminated with VOCs such as trichloroethylene (TCE), vinyl
chloride, and chloroform. Soil is contaminated with VOCs including meta-xylene and
toluene. Although the residences in the area now are connected to the public water
supply, the private wells have not been plugged. Therefore, there is the possibility that
the contaminated groundwater may be used for domestic purposes, such as watering
gardens.
December 1994
-------
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in two stages: initial actions and a single long-term remedial phase
focusing on cleanup of the entire site.
Response Action Status
Initial Action: In 1985, the City of Hutchison constructed a water line extension to
the residents affected by the contaminated well water. An alternate water supply also
was provided to the Obee school system adjacent to the landfill, which was drawing
water from a contaminated well.
Entire Site: In early 1990, the potentially responsible parties, under State
supervision, began conducting a study to determine the extent of soil and groundwater
contamination and to identify the sources responsible for contamination in the Obee
Road Landfill subsite and the Airport Road subsite. This study was completed in 1994. The
EPA selected the final cleanup remedy for the Obee Road Landfill subsite. The remedy calls for
groundwater monitoring with a contingency for further action if contaminant concentrations rise
above specified levels. The remedy also calls for institutional controls to limit access to the site
as well as not allowing the disturbance of the landfill cover. An additional phase of investigation
is needed to further characterize the groundwater plume contamination at the Airport Road
subsite.
Site Facts: In March 1990, a group of the parties potentially responsible for site contamination
signed a Consent Agreement with the KDHE in which the parties agreed to complete an
investigation of the site. After reviewing data from the Obee Road Site investigation and data
from the East Fourth Street Facility, a site bordering the Obee Road Site on the west, it became
apparent that the site needed to be divided into two subsites. In March of 1993 an amendment to
the State Administrative Order was signed and the Obee Road Landfill Subsite and the Airport
Road Subsite were defined.
Environmental Progress
Providing an alternative water supply reduced the potential for exposure to contaminated well
water. An interim pump and treat groundwater containment system is in operation at the East
Fourth Street Facility. This system will contain and treat the groundwater contamination while
cleanup of the Obee Road site is being planned.
Site Repository
Hutchison Public Library, 901 North Main, Hutchison, KS 67504
December 1994 2 OBEE ROAD
-------
PESTER
REFINERY CO.
KANSAS
EPA ID# KSD000829846
EPA REGION 7
Butler County
El Dorado
Site Description
The Pester Refinery Co. site occupies 10 acres in El Dorado. Refinery operations began in 1917.
Refining wastes have been stored in a burn pond and these materials periodically were ignited
through the mid-1970s. The burn pit is adjacent to the West Branch of the Walnut River, which
is used for recreational activities. In 1987, the Kansas Department of Health and the Environment
(KDHE) found seepage from the impoundment entering the river, and later the same year,
confirmed contamination of the river. Seepage from the burn pond has been diked, forming a
seepage pit. Rainwater and contaminated pond water, which have accumulated at the lagoon
surface, have overflowed on occasion and discharged to the river and adjacent flood plain. An
estimated 160 people obtain drinking water from private wells within 3 miles of the site.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal and State actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 06/24/88
Final Date: 03/29/89
Threats and Contaminants
Groundwater contaminants include lead and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) such
as vinyl chloride. Heavy metals, including lead and chromium, and VOCs have
contaminated the burn pond sediments. The burn pond sludge and surface water are
contaminated with heavy metals and VOCs. The soil is contaminated with heavy
metals. Accidental ingestion of contaminated groundwater, soil, sediments, or surface
water could pose a health risk. Since the site lies within the 100-year floodplain,
flooding of the site area is a concern.
December 1 994
-------
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in two long-term remedial phases focusing on cleanup of the source
of contamination and the ground water.
Response Action Status
Source Control: In 1990, the potentially responsible parties began conducting an
investigation into the nature and extent of the contamination at the site and defining
alternatives for cleanup. In 1992, the EPA selected a remedy to address the source of
contamination, including off-site removal of sludge in the burn pond and in-place bioremediation
of soils. Design of the remedy is currently underway and is expected to be completed in early
1995.
Groundwater: In 1994, the potentially responsible parties began conducting an
investigation into the nature and extent of the contamination of the ground water.
Once this investigation is completed, scheduled for 1996, the EPA will select
remedies to clean up the ground water.
Site Facts: In 1986, the State issued an Administrative Order to Pester to conduct studies on
how to close the impoundment. The owner demonstrated that he cannot afford to pay for the
cleanup and filed for bankruptcy. In 1990, past owner, Fina, along with Pester, signed a Consent
Order with the State to conduct a cleanup investigation and feasibility study. In September 1993,
an Order was signed by the State and Fina for the cleanup design and action work for the source
control. In December 1993, an Order was signed by the State and Fina for the cleanup
investigation and feasibility study for groundwater.
Environmental Progress
After performing preliminary investigations, the EPA determined that the Pester Refining Co. site
does not pose an immediate threat to human health and the environment while final site cleanup
activities are being planned.
Site Repository
Contact the Region 7 Superfund Community Relations Office.
December 1 994
PESTER REFINERY CO.
-------
STROTHER
INDUSTRIAL
PARK
KANSAS
EPA ID# KSD980862726
EPA REGION 7
Cowley County
ar Winfield and Arkansas City
Site Description
Strother Field Industrial Park is located near Winfield and Arkansas City and covers
approximately 2 square miles. Until 1946, the site was a military facility. The site now consists
of about 20 industrial and commercial businesses, as well as two inactive solid waste landfills.
The landfills were used for the disposal of various industrial wastes. Groundwater is
contaminated with volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Until 1983, the Strother Field
Commission operated a water supply system, consisting of eight wells on the site. The
contaminated ground water no longer is used for drinking, but still is used for industrial
processes. Drinking water was provided by trucks until the Commission installed two wells
upgradient of the contaminant plume. Approximately 2,300 people live within a 3-mile radius of
the site. The size of the worker population on the site is approximately 2,000. There are private
and public wells located in the vicinity of the site; some private wells are in the industrial park.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal, State, and potentially
responsible parties' actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 10/15/84
Final Date: 06/10/86
Threats and Contaminants
Samples collected and analyzed by the State indicated the presence of VOCs including
trichloroethylene (TCE) in several wells used for industrial processes only. People
who ingest or come in contact with contaminated groundwater may be at risk.
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in two stages: immediate actions and a long-term remedial phase
focusing on cleanup of the entire site.
December 1994
-------
Response Action Status
Immediate Actions: After the use of the industrial park wells as a source of
drinking water was discontinued, water was brought in by tank trucks. The Strother
Field Commission installed two wells upgradient of the contaminated plume to supply
water. Two of the eight wells remained in use to supply process water for the industries located
on the field. For the last several years, the Strother Field Commission has pumped these wells to
contain groundwater contamination beneath the site. In 1985, General Electric, a potentially
responsible party, installed groundwater extraction wells and air stripping towers to remove
VOCs from the groundwater under an Administrative Order with the Kansas Department of
Health and Environment (KDHE).
Entire Site: An investigation by the potentially responsible parties to identify the
types of contaminants remaining in the groundwater and other areas was completed in
early 1994. The EPA selected pump and treat as the groundwater remedy and soil
vapor extraction (SVE) to clean up the soil.
Site Facts: In 1985, the State issued an Administrative Order to General Electric Co., one of
the parties potentially responsible for wastes in the northern zone of the site. The Order called
for the company to sample soil; monitor groundwater; construct a groundwater flow model and
use it to help locate, construct, and operate withdrawal wells under the guidance of the State; and
submit a plan for a treatment and disposal system. The State issued another Administrative Order
in January 1986 to each of the four potentially responsible parties associated with the southern
zone of the site. The Order requires one potentially responsible party to treat the water from the
public supply well, each of the companies to drill monitoring wells on the southern end of the
field, and three of the parties to submit data on chemical use during the past 20 years. In March
1990, General Electric signed a Consent Agreement with the KDHE to complete an investigation
of the site.
Environmental Progress
The Strother Field Commission and General Electric Co., in conjunction with the State and the
EPA, have reduced the possibility of drinking contaminated groundwater by supplying a safe
drinking water source and installing groundwater extraction wells while final cleanup remedies
for the Strother Field Industrial Park site are being planned.
Site Repository
Strother Field Commission, Terminal Building, Fourth and "A" Street,
Cowley County, KS 67156
December 1 994 2 STROTHER FIELD
INDUSTRIAL PARK
------- |