v>EPA
                United States
                Environmental Protection
                Agency
                Office of Health and
                Environmental Assessment
                Washington DC 20460
EPA-600/8-83-021A
June 1983
External Review Draft
                Research and Development
Health Assessment
Document for
Inorganic Arsenic
 Review
 Draft
              \
 (Do Not
 Cite or Quote;
                              NOTICE

                This document is a preliminary draft. It has not been formally
                released by EPA and should not at this stage be construed to
                represent Agency policy. It is being circulated for comment on its
                technical accuracy and policy implications.

-------
REVIEW DRAFT                                           EPA-600/8-83-021A

DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE                                   Exiemal Review Draft
                       HEALTH ASSESSMENT DOCUMENT FOR
                              INORGANIC ARSENIC
                                 June, 1983
                                   NOTICE
This document is a preliminary draft.   It  has  not  been  formally released
by EPA and should not at this stage be  construed to  represent Agency policy.
It is being circulated for comment on its  technical  accuracy and policy
implications.
                    U.S.  ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY
                     OFFICE OF  RESEARCH AND  DEVELOPMENT
                ENVIRONMENTAL CRITERIA  AND ASSESSMENT OFFICE
                RESEARCH  TRIANGLE  PARK, NORTH CAROLINA 27711
013AS1/E                                                              June 1983

-------
                  The authors of this document are:

                              Dr. Paul Mushak
                       University of North Carolina
                        Chapel Hill, North Carolina
                            Dr. Magnus Piscator
                           Karolinska Institute
                             Stockholm, Sweden
                             Donna J. Sivulka
               Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office
                   U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                  Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
              The  cancer  risk assessment and portions of the
                section on carcinogenicity were prepared by:
                         Carcinogen Assessment  Group
                    U.S.  Environmental  Protection  Agency
                             Washington,  D.C.
                           Project  Manager:

                           Donna J.  Sivulka
             Environmental  Criteria and  Assessment Office
                 U.S.  Environmental  Protection Agency
                Research Triangle Park,  North Carolina
                                  11

013AS1/E                                                             June 1983

-------
             Participating members of the CAG are listed below:

            (Principal authors and contributors to carcinogencity
               sections of this document are designated by *).
                         Roy Albert, M.D. (Chairman)
                         Elizabeth Anderson, Ph.D.
                         Larry D. Anderson, Ph.D.
                         Steven Bayard, Ph.D.
                         David Bayliss, M.S.
                         Chao W.  Chen, Ph.D.
                         Margaret Chu, Ph.D.*
                         Herman J. Gibb, M.S., M.P.H.*
                         Bernard H.  Haberman,  D.V.M., M.S.
                         Charalingayya B. Hiremath, Ph.D.
                         Robert McGaughy, Ph.D.
                         Dharm V. Singh, D.V.M., Ph.D.
                         Todd W.  Thorslund, Sc.D.*

                         Kenny S. Crump, Ph.D. (consultant)*
                         Science Research Systems, Inc.
                         Ruston,  Louisiana
                                     m

013AS1/E                                                             June 1983

-------
                                  DISCLAIMER



         This report is an internal draft for review purposes only and does not



    constitute Agency policy.  Mention of trade names or commercial products



    does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.
                                        iv
013AS1/E                                                             June 1983

-------
                                     PREFACE
          The Office of Health and Environmental  Assessment,  in consultation
     with other Agency and non-Agency scientists, has prepared this health
     assessment to serve as a "source document" for Agency-wide use.   Speci-
     fically, this document was prepared at the request of the Office of Air
     Quality Planning and Standards.
          In the development of this assessment document, the scientific
     literature has been inventoried, key studies have been evaluated, and
     summary/conclusions have been prepared such that the toxicity of arsenic
     is qualitatively and where possible, quantitatively, identified. Observed
     effect levels and dose-response relationships are discussed where appro-
     priate in order to place adverse health responses in perspective with
     observed environmental levels.
013AS1/E                                                             June 1983

-------
                               TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF TABLES	                                   x
LIST OF FIGURES	\\"\      xii

1.    INTRODUCTION	      1-1

2.    SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS	                              2-1
     2.1  BACKGROUND INFORMATION	      2-1
          2.1.1  Chemical/Physical  Aspects of  Arsenic	      2-1
          2.1.2  The Environmental  Cycling of  Arsenic	      2-3
          2.1.3  Levels of Arsenic  in Various  Media	      2-4
                 2.1.3.1  Levels of Arsenic in Ambient Air	      2-4
                 2.1.3.2  Levels of Arsenic in Drinking Water	      2-5
                 2.1.3.3  Arsenic in Food	      2-5
                 2.1.3.4  Arsenic in Soils	      2-6
                 2.1.3.5  Other Sources of Arsenic	      2-6
     2.2  ARSENIC METABOLISM	      2-6
          2.2.1  Routes of Absorption	      2-6
                 2.2.1.1  Respiratory Absorption	      2-6
                 2.2.1.2  Gastrointestinal Absorption	      2-7
                 2.2.1.3  Transplacental  Transfer	      2-7
          2.2.2  Biotransformation  of Inorganic Arsenic In Vivo	      2-7
          2.2.3  Distribution of Arsenic in Man and Animals	      2-9
          2.2.4  Arsenic Accumulation	      2-10
          2.2.5  Arsenic Excretion	            2-10
     2.3  ARSENIC TOXICOLOGY	      2-10
          2.3.1  Acute Toxicity	      2-10
          2.3.2  Chronic Toxicity	      2-11
                 2.3.2.1  Carcinogenesis/Mutagenesis of Inorganic
                          Arsenic	      2-11
                          2.3.2.1.1  Human Epidemiology of Arsenic
                                     Carcinogenesis	      2-12
                          2.3.2.1.2  Experimental Studies of Arsenic
                                     Carcinogenesis	      2-18
                          2.3.2.1.3  Arsenic Mutagenesis	      2-18
                 2.3.2.2  Chronic Neurological Effects of Arsenic
                          Exposure	      2-19
                 2.3.2.3  Cardiovascular Effects  of Arsenic Exposure	      2-20
                 2.3.2.4  Other Systemic Effects  of Arsenic	      2-20
          2.3.3  Factors Affecting  Arsenic Toxicity	      2-21
     2.4  ARSENIC AS AN ESSENTIAL ELEMENT	      2-21
     2. 5  HUMAN HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT FOR ARSENIC	      2-22
          2.5.1  Exposure Aspects of Arsenic	      2-22
          2.5.2  Effect/Response Aspects of Arsenic	      2-23
                 2.5.2.1  Relevant  Health Effects	      2-23
                 2.5.2.2  Dose-Effect/Dose-Response Relationships	      2-25
          2.5.3  Populations at Special Risk to Health Effects of
                 Arsenic	      2-27
                                      VI



013AS1/B                                                             June 1983

-------
                               TABLE  OF  CONTENTS
                                  (continued)
3.    BACKGROUND INFORMATION	      3-1
     3.1  CHEMICAL/PHYSICOCHEMICAL ASPECTS	      3-1
     3.2  ENVIRONMENTAL CYCLING OF ARSENIC	      3-4
     3.3  LEVELS OF ARSENIC IN VARIOUS MEDIA	      3-8
          3.3.1  Levels of Arsenic in Ambient Air	      3-9
          3.3.2  Levels of Arsenic in Drinking Water	      3-15
          3.3.3  Arsenic in Food	      3-16
          3.3.4  Arsenic in Soils	      3-19
          3.3.5  Other Sources of Arsenic	      3-21

4.    ARSENIC METABOLISM	      4-1
     4.1  ROUTES OF ARSENIC ABSORPTION	      4-1
          4.1.1  Respiratory Absorption	      4-1
          4.1.2  Gastrointestinal Absorption	      4-8
          4.1.3  Transplacental Passage	      4-10
     4.2  BIOTRANSFORMATION PROCESSES IN VIVO	      4-11
          4.2.1  Biomethylation of Inorganic Arsenic in Humans and
                 Experimental Animals	      4-12
                 4.2.1.1  Human Studies	      4-12
                 4.2.1.2  Animal Studies	      4-15
          4.2.2  In Vivo Oxidation/Reduction of Inorganic Arsenic in
                 Mammalian Systems	      4-15
          4.2.3  Chemical Stability of Trivalent and Pentavalent In-
                 organic Arsenic to Oxidation-Reduction	      4-19
     4. 3  DISTRIBUTION OF ARSENIC IN MAN AND ANIMALS	      4-20
     4.4  ARSENIC ACCUMULATION	      4-23
     4.5  ARSENIC EXCRETION IN MAN AND ANIMALS	      4-24

5.    ARSENIC TOXICOLOGY	      5-1
     5.1  ACUTE TOXICITY OF ARSENIC IN MAN AND ANIMALS	      5-1
     5.2  CHRONIC TOXICITY OF ARSENIC IN MAN AND ANIMALS	      5-2
          5.2.1  Carcinogenicity/Mutagenicity of Arsenic	      5-2
                 5.2.1.1  Clinical Aspects of Human Arsenic
                          Carcinogenesis	      5-16
                 5.2.1.2  Epidemiological Aspects of Human Arsenic
                          Carcinogenesis	      5-18
                          5.2.1.2.1  Cancer of the Lung	      5-18
                          5.2.1.2.2  Cancer of the Skin and Pre-
                                     cancerous Skin Lesions	      5-56
                          5.2.1.2.3  Other Cancers	      5-76
                 5.2.1.3  Experimental Studies of Arsenic
                          Carcinogenesis	      5-78
                 5.2.1.4  Quantitative Carcinogen Risk Estimates	      5-86
                          5.2.1.4.1  Introduction	      5-86
                          5.2.1.4.2  Unit Risk for Air	      5-89
                                     5.2.1.4.2.1  Methodology for
                                                  Quantitative Risk
                                                  Estimates	      5-89
                                      vn

013AS1/B                                                             June 1983

-------
                              TABLE OF CONTENTS
                                 (continued)
                                    5.2.1.4.2.2  Risk Estimates from
                                                 Epidemiologic
                                                 Studies	     5-93
                                    5.2.1.4.2.3  The Lee-Feldstein
                                                 (1982) Study	     5-94
                                    5.2.1.4.2.4  The Higgins et al.
                                                 (1982) Study	     5-104
                                    5.2.1.4.2.5  The Brown and Chu
                                                 Estimates from the
                                                 Anaconda Data	     5-110
                                    5.2.1.4.2.6  The Enter!ine and
                                                 Marsh  (1982) Study....     5-120
                                    5.2.1.4.2.7  The Ott et al.
                                                 (1974) Study	     5-129
                                    5.2.1.4.2.8  Discussion	     5-134
                          5.2.1.4.3  Unit  Risk  for Water	     5-136
                          5.2.1.4.4  Relative Potency	     5-143
                 5.2.1.5   Summary  and  Conclusions of  the
                          Carcinogenicity  of Arsenic	     5-147
                          5.2.1.5.1  Qualitative Summary	     5-147
                          5.2.1.5.2  Quantitative Summary	     5-149
                          5.2.1.5.3  Conclusions	     5-150
                 5.2.1.6   Arsenic  Mutagenesis	     5-150
          5.2.2   Non-Carcinogenic  Chronic  Effects	     5-156
                 5.2.2.1   Neurotoxic Effects	     5-156
                 5.2.2.2   Cardiovascular Effects	     5-161
                 5.2.2.3   Teratogenesis  and Developmental Effects	     5-165
                          5.2.2.3.1  Animal  Studies	     5-165
                          5.2.2.3.2  Human Studies	     5-168
                 5.2.2.4   Hematological  Effects	     5-169
                 5.2.2.5   Hepatic  Effects	     5-171
                 5.2.2.6   Renal  Effects	     5-172
                 5.2.2.7   Respiratory  Effects	     5-172
                 5.2.2.8   Immunosuppressant Effects	     5-173
     5.3  FACTORS AFFECTING ARSENIC  TOXICITY	     5-173

6.    ARSENIC AS  AN ESSENTIAL ELEMENT	     6-1

7.    HUMAN HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT  FOR  ARSENIC	     7-1
     7.1  AGGREGATE EXPOSURE LEVELS  TO ARSENIC  IN  THE U.S.  POPULATION...     7-1
     7.2  SIGNIFICANT HUMAN HEALTH EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH  AMBIENT
          EXPOSURES	     7-4
          7.2.1   Acute Exposure Effects	     7-4
          7.2.2   Chronic  Exposure  Effects	     7-5
     7.3  DOSE-EFFECT/DOSE-RESPONSE  RELATIONSHIPS	     7-7
          7.3.1   General  Considerations	     7-7
          7.3.2   Effects  and Dose-Response Relationships	     7-8
                 7.3.2.1   Respiratory  Cancer	      7-9

                                     viii

013AS1/B                                                             June 1983

-------
                               TABLE OF CONTENTS
                                  (continued)
                 7.3.2.2  Skin Cancer	      7-9
                 7.3.2.3  Non-cancerous Skin Lesions	      7-10
                 7.3.2.4  Peripheral  Neuropathological  Effects and
                          Cardiovascular Effects	      7-10
     7.4  POPULATIONS AT SPECIAL RISK TO ARSENIC EXPOSURE	      7-11

8.  REFERENCES	      8-1
                                      IX
013AS1/B                                                             June 1983

-------
                                LIST OF TABLES
Table                                                                        Page

3-1  Physical Properties of Arsenic and Arsenic Compounds	     3-2
3-2  Cumulative Frequency Distribution of NASN Individual 24-Hour
     Ambient Air Arsenic Levels	     3-10
3-3  Primary Copper Smelters in the United States	     3-13
3-4  Levels of Arsenic by Food Class in Adult Food Composites from
     20 U.S. Cities	     3-17
3-5  Levels of Arsenic by Food Class in Infant and Toddler Food
     Composites from 10 U.S. Cities	     3-18
3-6  A Comparison of Arsenic Levels in Arsenic-Treated and
     Uncontaminated Soils in North America	     3-20

5-1  Summary of Case Reports and Epidemiologic Studies of Cancer
     or Precancerous Lesions in Persons Exposed to Arsenic	     5-3
5-2  Observed and Expected Deaths Due to Respiratory Malignancies,
     By Exposure Category	     5-21
5-3  Observed and Expected Deaths for Selected Causes in Retrospective
     Cohort Analysis (1940-1973)	     5-23
5-4  Observed and Expected Deaths and Standardized Mortality Ratio for
     Selected Causes of Death of 527 Males of Cohort Under Study	     5-28
5-5  Observed and Expected Respiratory Cancer Deaths and Standardized
     Mortality Ratios by Arsenic Exposure Index	     5-29
5-6  Observed and Expected Respiratory Cancer Deaths and Standardized
     Mortality Ratios by Intensity and Duration of Exposure to Arsenic...     5-29
5-7  Respiratory Cancer Deaths and SMRs By Cumulative Arsenic
     Exposure Lagged 0 and 10 years, Tacoma Smelter Workers	     5-31
5-8  Respiratory Cancer Deaths and SMRs by Duration of Exposure and
     Latency, Tacoma Smelter Workers	     5-33
5-9  Respiratory Cancer Deaths and SMRs by Duration and  Intensity
     of Exposures, Tacoma Smelter Workers	     5-34
5-10 1965  Smelter Survey Atmospheric Arsenic  Concentrations	     5-38
5-11 Observed and Expected Deaths from Respiratory Cancer, with
     Standardized Mortality Ratios  (SMR), by  Cohort and  Degree of
     Arsenic Exposure, 1938-63	    5-39
5-12 Mortality for All Causes  and Respiratory Cancer  from 1938 to  1978
     by Time-Weighted Average  (TWA)  Arsenic Exposure  as  of Entrance  into
     Cohort	    5-46
5-13 Mortality for All Causes  and Respiratory Cancer  by  Ceiling Arsenic
     Exposure as of  Entrance  into Cohort	     5-47
5-14 Respiratory Cancer Mortality by Method of Analysis  and  TWA
     Arseni c Category	     5-49
5-15 Respiratory Cancer Mortality by Method of Analysis  and  Ceiling
     Arsenic Category	     5-50
5-16 Prevalence  of  Skin  Cancer (per 1000) by  Age and  Arsenic
     Exposure  (ppm)	    5-57
5-17 Results of  Total  Arsenic  Analysis and Arsenite  and  Arsenate
     Determination  in  the  Yenshei Water  Samples	    5-61
5-18  Lane  County Water Arsenic Levels 1974-1978	    5-67
5-19 Age  Specific  Death  Rates  for  Utah and Three Mi Hard County
     Communities	    5-71
5-20  Summary Table  of  Experimental  Studies of Arsenic Carcinogenesis	    5-79
 013AS1/B                                                             June 1983

-------
                                LIST OF TABLES (continued)

No.                                                                          Page

5-21 Observed and Expected Deaths Due to Selected Causes,
     With Standardized Mortality Ratios (SMRs) Among Smelter
     Workers, 1938-1977	    5-95
5-22 Description of Length of Employment Groups, With Numbers of
     Smelter Workers, Numbers of Deaths, Person-Years at Risk,
     and Duration of Smelter Employment (Based on Total Work
     Experience Through September 30, 1977)	     5-96
5-23 Observed and Expected Deaths from Respiratory Cancer, With
     Person-Years of Follow-Up, By Cohort and Degree of Arsenic
     Exposure	    5-97
5-24 Dose-Response Data from Lee-Feldstein (1982) Used for Risk
     Assessment	    5-100
5-25 Summary of Quantitative Risk Analyses	    5-103
5-26 Respiratory Cancer Mortality 1938-1978 from Cumulative Exposure
     to Arsenic for 1800 Men Working at the Anaconda Copper Smelter	    5-106
5-27 Observed and Expected Lung Cancer Deaths and Person-Years By
     Level of Exposure, Duration of Employment and Age at Initial
     Employment	    5-112
5-28 Arsenic Exposures:  1965 Smelter Survey Atmospheric Arsenic
     Concentrations	    5-115
5-29 Observed and Expected Number of Respiratory Cancer Deaths for Each
     Cel 1 in the Low-Exposure Group of Table 5-27	    5-118
5-30 Cells from Table 5-29 Combined Within Rows to Obtain Cells With
     Three or More Expected Respiratory Cancer Deaths	    5-119
5-31 Cells from Table 5-29 Combined Within Columns to Obtain Cells
     With Three or More Expected Respiratory Cancer Deaths	    5-119
5-32 Observed Deaths and SMRs for 2802 Smelter Workers Who Worked a
     Year or More 1940-64, Followed Through 1976, By Cause of Death	    5-121
5-33 Data From Table 8 of Enter!ine and Marsh (1982), With Person-
     Years of Observation Added	    5-124
5-34 Data From Tab! e 4 of Ott et al.  (1974)	    5-131
5-35 Combined Unit Risk Estimates for Absolute-Risk Linear Models	    5-135
5-36 Age-Exposure-Specific Prevalence Rates for Skin Cancer	    5-138
5-37 Data Utilized to Obtain Predictor Equation and Figure 5-12	    5-141
5-38 Relative Carcinogenic Potencies Among 52 Chemicals Evaluated by
     the Carcinogen Assessment Group As Suspect Human Carcinogens	    5-145
5-39 Chromosomal  Effects of Inorganic Arsenic in Man and Animals	    5-151
5-40 Summary of Studies Investigating Arsenic-Induced Mutagenic Effects..    5-153
5-41 Prevalence of Blackfoot Disease (per 1000) by Age and Arsenic
     Exposure (ppm)	    5-162

7-1  Routes of Daily Human Arsenic Intake	    7-2
                                      XI

013AS1/B                                                             June 1983

-------
                                LIST OF FIGURES


Figure                                                                       Page

3-1  The Generalized Geochemical  Cycle for Arsenic	     3-5
3-2  Biological Cycling of Arsenic	     3-7
3-3  NASN Annual Average Arsenic  Concentrations	     3-11
4-1  Arsenic Retention in Rat Lungs Following Intratracheal
     Instillation of a Single Dose	     4-4
4-2  Lung Concentrations of Arsenic in Hamsters Given Weekly
     Intratracheal Instillations  of Arsenic Trioxide, Arsenic
     Trisulfide or Calcium Arsenate	      4-7

5-1  Comparison of Census Tracts  Experiencing Exposure to the Fisher
     Formation and Exhibiting High Skin Cancer Occurrence	     5-68
5-2  Relative Risks and 90% Confidence Limits for Data of
     Lee-Feldstein (1982)	     5-101
5-3  Absolute Risks and 90% Confidence Limits for Data of
     Lee-Feldstein (1982)	     5-102
5-4  Relative Risks and 90% Confidence Limits for Data of Higgins
     (1982)	     5-108
5-5  Absolute Risks and 90% Confidence Limits for Data of Higging
     (1982)	     5-109
5-6  Relative Risks and 90% Confidence Limits for Zero-Lag Data of
     Enter!line and Marsh (1982)	    5-125
5-7  Relative Risks and 90% Confidence Limits for 10-Year Lag Data of
     Enterl ine and Marsh (1982)	    5-126
5-8  Absolute Risks and 90% Confidence Limits for Zero-Lag Data of
     Enterl i ne and Marsh (1982)	    5-127
5-9  Absolute Risks and 90% Confidence Limits for 10-Year Lag Data of
     Enterl ine and Marsh (1982)	    5-128
5-10 Relative Risks and 90% Confidence Limits for Data of Ott et al.,
     1974, with Highest Exposure  Group Omitted	    5-132
5-11 Relationship Between Transformed Prevalence and log ppm Arsenic in
     Water, log age.	    5-142
5-12 Histogram Representing the Frequency of Distribution of the Potency
     Indices of 52 Suspect Carcinogens Evaluated by the Carcinogen
     Assessment Group	    5-144
                                      xn
013AS1/B                                                             June 1983

-------
                           ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
     The following individuals attended a review workshop on an early draft
of this document and submitted valuable comments:
Dr.  Thomas Clarkson
Department of Environmental Health Sciences
University of Rochester
Rochester, New York
Dr.  Annemarie Crocetti
New York Medical College
New York, New York

Dr.  Philip Enterline
Department of Biostatisties
Graduate School of Public Health
University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Dr.  Paul Hammond
Kettering Laboratory
University of Cincinnati
Cincinnati, Ohio

Dr.  Dinko Kello
Institute for Medical Research
Zagreb, Yugoslavia

Dr.  Paul Mushak
                ithology
                          ina
Ur.  fdU I  HUblldK.
Department of Pathology
University of North Caroline
Chapel Hill, North Carolina

Dr.  Magnus Piscator
Karolinska Institute
Department of Environmental Hygiene
Stockholm, Sweden

Dr.  Samuel Shibko
Division of Toxicology
U.S. Food and Drug Administration
Washington, D.C.


     In addition, there are several scientists who contributed valuable
information and/or constructive criticism to interim drafts of this  report.
                                      XI 11
 013AS1/B                                                              June 1983

-------
Of specific note are the contributions of:   Gerald Akland, Gary Evans, Warren
Galke, Lester Grant, Victor Hasselblad, Casey Jason, Kantharajapura S. Lavappa,
Charles Nauman, and Terry Risher.
                                      xiv
013AS1/B                                                             June 1983

-------
                                1.   INTRODUCTION

     This report evaluates  health  effects  associated with arsenic exposure,
with particular emphasis  being  placed  on the delineation of  health  effects
thought to be  of  most concern in  regard to exposure to inorganic arsenic of
the general  U.S.  population.  Organic arsenic compounds are  considered only in
so far as certain forms of  the element arise via transformation of arsenic  in
man and other species, or arise by environmental transformation.
     This report is  organized into chapters which provide a cohesive discus-
sion of  all  aspects  of inorganic  arsenic and delineate a logical linking of
this information to  human health risk.   The chapters  include:  an executive
summary  (Chapter 2)  of the information  contained  within  the text of  later
chapters; background  information on  the  chemical and environmental aspects  of
arsenic,  including  levels  of  arsenic  in media with which  U.S.  population
groups come  into  contact (Chapter 3);  arsenic  metabolism,  where  factors of
absorption, biotransformation, tissue distribution, and excretion of inorganic
arsenic  are  discussed with  reference to the element's toxicity (Chapter 4);
arsenic toxicology, discussing the various acute, subacute,  and chronic  health
effects  of  inorganic  arsenic  in man and animals,  including discussion of
selected dose-effect  and  dose-response relationshops,  (Chapter 5); arsenic  as
an essential element, which deals with the current status of inorganic arsenic
as a  required  nutrient in at  least some  species of animals  (Chapter  6);  and a
human  health risk assessment  for  arsenic, where  key  information from  the
preceding chapters is placed  in an  interpretive and quantitative perspective
highlighting those health effects  likely of most concern for U.S.  populations,
(Chapter 7).
013AS5/B                             1-1                              June 1983

-------
     This report is not intended to be an exhaustive review of all  the arsenic
literature, but  is focused upon those  data  thought to be most  useful  and
relevant for human  health  risk  assessment purposes.  Particular emphasis is
placed on  delineation of health effects and risks associated with exposure to
airborne arsenic,  in view  of  the most immediate use intended for the present
report, i.e.,  to serve  as a basis for decision making regarding the regulation
of arsenic as a  hazardous air pollutant under pertinent sections of the Clean
Air Act, as amended in 1977.  Health effects associated with the ingestion of
arsenic  or with  exposure via  other routes are  also discussed, providing a
basis  for  possible  use for multimedia risk assessment purposes, as well.  The
background information  provided at  the  outset on  sources,  emissions,  and
ambient concentrations of  arsenic  in various media  is presented in order to
provide a general perspective  against which to view the health effects evalua-
tions  contained  in  later chapters  of the document.   More  detailed exposure
assessments,  taking  into account even more recent,  up-to-date emission and
ambient concentration data are to be prepared separately for use in subsequent
EPA regulatory decision making regarding arsenic.
013AS5/B                             1-2                              June 1983

-------
                           2.   SUMMARY AND  CONCLUSIONS

     As a toxic agent,  inorganic arsenic possesses  several  properties that are
not shared with many environmental pollutants.  The element exists in various
chemical states, e.g., tri-  and pentavalent inorganic  arsenic and methylated
organic arsenic, with each having differing toxicological potential.  In man,
experimental  animals  and other  organisms,  arsenic undergoes  a  variety  of
transformations, the full significance  and mechanisms of which are as yet  not
well understood.  Furthermore,  there  appears  to be a nutritional requirement
for low levels of arsenic in certain experimental  animals and this may also be
the case for man.   All  of these factors complicate the analyses of the toxico-
logical effects and  the  risk for human  health  associated with environmental
exposure to arsenic compounds.  The following chapter summarizes these factors
as they are presented in-depth in the ensuing document text.
2.1  BACKGROUND INFORMATION
2.1.1  Chemical/Physical  Aspects of Arsenic
     It is the various compounds of arsenic which have been of most  importance
in  the  extensive  history of the toxicology of  the element, the zero-valent
metallic form being of minor toxicological interest.
     Arsenic is encountered  as  a component of sulfidic  ores of metals such as
copper,  cobalt and  nickel.   The  smelting  of  these ores is  associated with
arsenic  release  into the environment.   Arsenic  trioxide,  As203,  a toxicologi-
cally  significant  form,  is a  smelter product arising from air  roasting  of
these sulfidic ores.
     Arsenic trioxide, white arsenic,  is  only  sparingly soluble  in  water  and
other  solvents which do not  promote  chemical transformation.  The  compound
dissolves  in acidic  or alkaline  aqueous  media to yield either  the  free acid or


013AS5/A                              2-1                             June 1983

-------
salts, with these being  soluble  in a number of solvents.  The oxide readily
sublimes (135°C) and this  factor  is of importance in considering analytical
methods for measuring levels of the compound.
     The pentavalent arsenic pentoxide, ASpOj-, may be prepared by nitric acid
oxidation of the trioxide  or the  element itself.   This form has  high solubi-
lity in water (63 g/100 g water),  forming the strongly oxidizing  arsenic acid,
H3As04 (E° = 0.56V).
     Stability of the  valency  forms of arsenic in solution are dependent on
the nature  of  the  medium.   Oxygenated media and  higher  pH favor the penta-
valent form, while reducing and/or acidic media  favor the trivalent state.
     The acids of both valency forms of arsenic readily  form alkali  and alka-
line metal  salts with  the former being much more soluble than the  latter.
Organic ester  derivatives  of arsenic are quite labile to hydrolysis and this
chemical behavior has biochemical/toxicological implications in the postulated
role of arsenate ion in interfering with phosphorylation reactions.
     Arsine (arsenic trihydride,  AsH3)  is the most  poisonous  of the arseni-
cal s,  being a strong  hemolytic agent,  and it can be  formed  under certain
restricted  conditions, i.e., reduction of the oxy compounds in the presence of
a strong hydrogen source.
     Mono-  and dimethyl arsenic arise by both environmental and i_n vivo trans-
formation processes.
      In  high-temperature  processes, arsenic is released  as a  vapor which  is
then  adsorbed  or condensed onto  small  particles.   Such adherence  to particles
of  1-2 urn or less may result  in  enhanced health risk from the  agent  since
particles  in  this  size range are  inhaled and deposited in the  deepest  part of
the respiratory  tract.
 013AS5/A                              2-2                               June  1983

-------
     Arsenic compounds tend to  form  insoluble complexes with soils and sedi-
ments.   In  the  case  of  soils, the interaction occurs with amorphous aluminum
or iron oxides.
2.1.2  The Environmental  Cycling of Arsenic
     Primary smelting, biocide  use and glass  manufacturing constitute  some of
the major  inputs  of  arsenic into the various environmental compartments.   Of
an estimated total release  of approximately  10,000 short  tons annually in the
U.S.,  smelter  activity  accounts  for  about 50 percent, biocide  (pesticide,
fungicide,  herbicide) use  contributes 32 percent, and  glass production con-
tributes  about  7.0 percent with the remaining  amount  being released  from
various other sources.
     The  atmosphere  is a major  conduit for arsenic emitted from  anthropogenic
sources to  the  other  environmental compartments  via  wet and  dry  precipitation
processes.  Dry and  wetfall onto soils  may  be followed by movement through
soils  either  into groundwater  or surface water.  Passage of arsenic  into
surface waters  may be followed  by transfer to  sediments.
     Such  cycling is  made  complex by chemical and biological transformations
which  have been reported as  occurring in  the various environmental compart-
ments.
     Trivalent  arsenic  in  the  atmosphere  or in aerated  surface waters can
undergo oxidation to  the pentavalent  state,  while pentavalent arsenic  in media
which  are below pH 7.0 and contain oxidizable material  can  react to  form the
trivalent form  via reduction.
     Biological  transformations of arsenic  have  been documented as occurring
via  both  sedimentary bacteria  and suspended marine  algae.   Several different
hypotheses  have been advanced  to  explain  the biological cycling of arsenic.
 013AS5/A                             2-3                               June 1983

-------
     Reduction and methylation of  inorganic  arsenic occurs  only to a limited
extent in soils,  one  report  noting a conversion of  only  1-2 percent over a
period of months.
     With reference to the relative amounts of the  annual  environmental  burden
of arsenic, it  has  been  calculated for 1974 that land is the major sink for
arsenic,  approximately 90 percent, with the  atmosphere  accounting for 7-8
percent and the smallest  quantity appearing in waters.
2.1.3  Levels  of Arsenic  in Various Media
     Available data  on levels of  arsenic  in various media  with  which  man
interacts are generally  in  the  form of total  arsenic  content,  with limited
information available  for  identifying  specific chemical  forms of arsenic  in
the media.
2.1.3.1  Levels of Arsenic in Ambient Air—Based on the comprehensive data for
U.S.  air levels of  arsenic obtained by the U.S. EPA's National Air Sampling
Network,  air  levels of arsenic in the U.S. generally do not  exceed 0.1 ug/m3.
     Generally, airborne  arsenic  is  adhered  to particulate  matter.   Although
the  immediate  areas  around smelters may contain some  arsenic in the vapor
form, data is  available to indicate rapid adherence to particulate matter when
sampling 2-3 km from these emission sites.
     The specific  chemical  forrn(s)  of  airborne arsenic  is  still unclear.
Generally,  in most  urban/suburban  areas,  arsenic is mainly  in the form of a
mixture  of  inorganic  arsenic in the tri-  and pentavalent states.  Only  in
areas where methylated arsenic  is used agriculturally or where biotic trans-
formation can occur has methylated arsenic been found in air samples.
013AS5/A                             2-4                              June 1983

-------
2.1.3.2  Levels of Arsenic in Drinking Water—The most comprehensive survey of
community drinking water  supplies  for arsenic content was reported in 1970,
involving 18,000 systems.   More than 99 percent of the sites  sampled contained
less than  the 10  ppb  (0.01 mg/liter)  detection  limit,  measured as total
arsenic.
     Well waters in the western U.S. and Alaska,  however, may have much higher
levels owing  to  geochemical  enrichment.   In Lane County, Oregon, recent ana-
lyses report  levels up to 2.2  ppm  (2.2 mg/liter), while  the  highest figure  in
Alaska was 10 ppm  (10 mg/liter), representing  both natural and mining  residue
contributions.
     It  is reasonable  to  assume that the chief  chemical  form of arsenic in
most public water  supplies  would be the pentavalent inorganic form, owing to
both aeration and chlorination.  Similarly, well waters in  Alaska and  the
western  U.S.  are reported to mainly  contain  pentavalent inorganic arsenic.
2.1.3.3  Arsenic in Food—The most recent data base for the arsenic content of
foods is the  1975-1976  survey carried out by the U.S. Food and Drug Adminis-
tration.   Shellfish and other  marine foods have the highest levels on a food
category basis.    Overall,  the total dietary  intake  of  arsenic  in  1975-1976
was approximately 50 |jg (elemental  arsenic), representing an increase from the
preceding years.   Whether this  increase  represents a  trend or merely reflects
random variation  in sampling from  year to year  is  still to be  determined.
     The chemical  forms of  arsenic in foods are varied and complex.  Crusta-
ceans and other  marine  life store arsenic  in  complex organoarsenical  forms
which,  based  on  recent reports,  are  assimilated by man and generally excreted
intact.   Toxicologically,  these forms are comparatively inert.
013AS5/A                             2-5                              June 1983

-------
2.1-3.4  Arsenic in SoiIs—Background soil  arsenic levels range from less  than
1 ppm to over 40 ppm, the latter reflecting agricultural practices as well as
air fallout.
     Soil  arsenic  is  usually  bound  to clay surfaces, and  its  mobility is a
function of soil pH,  phosphate  levels,  iron and  aluminum  content,  and soil
type.   The mobile  fraction, usually in the pentavalent form, is of concern in
terms of movement to plants  and  water.   Little  reductive methylation occurs in
most soils.
2.1.3.5  Other Sources of Arsenic—Limited data on arsenic content of tobacco
suggests that more  recent values  range  from around 1.5  ppm or  less,  while in
the past (1945)  values  up  to  40 ppm were  measured.   This  decrease  reflects
reduced use of arsenical  biocides  in tobacco production.
2.2  ARSENIC METABOLISM
2.2.1  Routes of Absorption
     Major routes  of absorption of  arsenic in the  general  population are
inhalation and  ingestion, either by direct intake of food and water or secon-
dary to inhalation and swallowing.   Arsenic uptake through  the  skin  appears to
be  a  minor  route of exposure.  Factors affecting the  extent of absorption
include chemical forms,  particle size, and solubility.
2.2.1.1  Respiratory Absorption—Limited data from human subjects suggest  that
about 40 percent of  inhaled arsenic is deposited  in  the  lungs, of which 75-85
percent  is  absorbed  over  several  days,   yielding  a net  absorption  of
approximately 30 percent of the  inhaled amount.
     Several studies  of  smelter workers also confirm that  significant  absorp-
tion  of  inhaled arsenic occurs, as judged  by  rapidly  rising urine arsenic
levels when  exposure first occurs.   Furthermore, the  levels  excreted are
correlated with workplace air levels.


013AS5/A                             2-6                              June 1983

-------
     Animal  data  also  indicate respiratory  tract  absorption  when exposure



occurs by inhalation of aerosols or by intratracheal  instillation.



2.2.1.2  Gastrointestinal  Absorption—Based on a number of reports using human



subjects, soluble inorganic arsenic  is  almost totally absorbed from the gas-



trointestinal  tract.   Similar  data has been obtained  for  such experimental



animal species as the rat, pig, and monkey.



     Less soluble forms of  arsenic,  such as arsenic trioxide  in suspension,



lead  to  considerably  lower absorption  while insoluble arsenic triselenide



passes through the human GI  tract with negligible absorption.



2.2.1.3  Transplacental Transfer—Transplacental transfer  of  arsenic in man



appears to occur  based on autopsy  data  and on one  report showing that newborn



cord  blood  levels approximate those  of the  mothers.   Measurable levels of



arsenic in fetal tissue have been determined by the fourth month of gestation,



increasing to month seven.



     In  animals,  inorganic  arsenic  appears  to  rapidly cross  the placenta!



barrier where it is distributed in embryonic tissue.



2.2.2  Biotransformation of Inorganic Arsenic In-Vivo



     An understanding  of inorganic arsenic metabolism in man and other species



is complicated  by recently  revealed biotransformations, processes discovered



because of the  development  of  analytical  techniques which  permit  the chemical



speciation of arsenic  into its various  forms.  These processes not only relate



to pharmacokinetic  parameters  such as  tissue distribution and excretion, but



also  figure in  the  toxicology of the element.  The two processes of signifi-



cance  for  consideration here  are  the methylation  of inorganic arsenic  and



oxidation-reduction interconversion of  inorganic arsenic.



     An  extensive recent  literature  documents  the  i_n  vivo  methylation of



inorganic arsenic to mono-  and dimethyl  arsenic (the  latter  being  the  major









013AS5/A                             2-7                              June 1983

-------
methylated metabolite) in  every  mammalian system studied to date, including
man.
     While the quantitative  features  of this phenomenon may vary among spe-
cies, one can  generally  state that:  1) dimethyl arsenic is the major trans-
formation product; 2)  methylation  represents a route of detoxification, the
methylated forms  being not only  much less toxic but  also  more rapidly ex-
creted;  3) the methylating capacity of a given system can persist over a range
of  inorganic arsenic  exposure but  at some point can  be overwhelmed; and 4)
retrospective assessment of  early data  on arsenic metabolism must be reviewed
in  light  of  the current knowledge about  biomethylation.   In man, dimethyl
arsenic  represents  approximately 75-90 percent of  total  arsenic  excretion,
with monomethyl arsenic being excreted in lesser amounts.
     The demonstration of  interconversion of  the two  valency forms of arsenic
claimed  in earlier  literature must be considered in light of the biomethyla-
tion phenomenon,  and  only  more recent  studies addressing this problem using
chemical speciation techniques can  be considered reliable.   Invariably, the
giving of inorganic penta- or trivalent arsenic to  experimental  animals or
human volunteers  leads to  predominantly methylated forms,  with any inorganic
arsenic  being  present in  small  amounts.  Two recent studies using  similar
speciation methods and human subjects, offer conflicting data regarding the vr\
vivo reduction of pentavalent to trivalent arsenic.   In one study, no increase
in  urinary output of  trivalent arsenic was seen when pentavalent arsenic was
given,  while  the second  report  notes  levels  of  trivalent arsenic in urine
which are claimed to only  arise from i_n vivo reduction.   The former study used
one  subject, the latter  three subjects.   Thus, in vivo  reduction  of  inorganic
arsenic remains  to be confirmed.
013AS5/A                             2-8                              June 1983

-------
     Even with sophisticated analytical methods permitting chemical speciation
in biological media, the  lability of arsenic  in dosing solution to oxidation-
reduction requires careful  assessment  of the actual form being administered.
2.2.3  Distribution of Arsenic in Man and Animals
     Blood is the  main  vehicle for transport of arsenicals following absorp-
tion, and from  which  arsenic is cleared relatively rapidly to tissues in all
species except  the rat.   In  the  rat, arsenic-erythrocyte  interaction  tends to
preclude rapid  movement  to tissues,  with a biological half-time of up to 90
days, versus  a corresponding  time  of  several  days in all other  species.
Arsenic movement from blood appears  to conform to  a three-compartment model
which must  reflect in  part the biomethylation of  inorganic  arsenic  noted
above.
     Exposure of  various experimental   animals  to  either tri-or pentavalent
inorganic arsenic  leads  to  initial  accumulation of the  element  in  liver,
kidney,  spleen, aorta,  and skin.   In most species, arsenic clearance  from soft
tissue  is  relatively  rapid except for  the  skin,  where the high sulfhydryl
group content probably promotes tight arsenical binding.
     In man,  tissue partitioning data   is mainly available from autopsy data.
Heart, kidney, liver and  lung have highest levels on a concentration  basis, but
skin  and  excretory/storage organs such as  nails  and  hair have the highest
absolute amounts.  Brain  tissue  has  levels  only slightly  below  those  of  other
soft tissues.
     Recent data on valency  and  exposure  level  effects on tissue distribution
of arsenic  indicate that levels of  arsenic  in kidney, liver, bile,  brain,
skeleton,  skin,  and blood are 2- to 25-fold higher for the trivalent  form than
for the pentavalent state,  and are greatly increased  at  higher dosing.  The
difference is held to be due to the relative  methylating capacity of either
form as  well  as the level of exposure.

013AS5/A                             2-9                              June 1983

-------
2.2.4  Arsenic Accumulation
     The long-held view of arsenic as an element which accumulates in the body
was mainly based  on  the behavior of arsenic  in  the  rat,  an anomalous model
which does not reflect the case with other species.   For other species, inclu-
ding man, long-term  accumulation  does  not generally  occur in psysiologically
active compartments in the body.
     In man, the  only  evidence for tissue accumulation is  autopsy data for
retired workers with a  history of metal smelter exposure which indicates lung
arsenic levels 8-fold higher than in a control population.  This  suggests the
existence of a very insoluble form of arsenic in smelter ambient air.
2.2.5  Arsenic Excretion
     Renal clearance appears to  be  the major route of excretion  of  absorbed
arsenic in man and animals.   Biliary transport of the element leads to enteric
reabsorption, with little carriage in feces.
     In man,  inorganic  arsenic is excreted  rather rapidly,  and  in  several
studies in which  continuous  exposure resulted in the  acquisition of steady
state, around 60 percent of a given dose was  excreted within one day.
     The  pattern  of  renal  excretion reflects the j_n  vivo biotransformation
capacity for inorganic  arsenic,  one  study noting that trivalent  arsenic was
excreted  more  slowly than an equivalent dose of  the pentavalent form,  and
higher doses  of  both forms were cleared  relatively  more  slowly  than  lower
doses.
2.3  ARSENIC TOXICOLOGY
2.3.1  Acute Toxicity
     Acute symptoms  of  arsenic poisoning are similar in both man and experi-
mental animals.  With oral exposure,  the acute symptoms include severe gastro-
intestinal damage  resulting in vomiting  and diarrhea and general vascular


013AS5/A                             2-10                             June 1983

-------
collapse leading to shock, coma, and death.  Other acute effects are muscular
cramps, facial  edema,  and cardiovascular reactions.   Airborne exposure at high
levels also results in severe irritation of nasal  mucosa,  larynx,  and bronchi.
Sequalae of acute  contact  with inorganic arsenic include peripheral nervous
system disturbances with slow  recovery and reversible effects  on  the hema-
topoietic system.
     Levels of exposure  associated  with acute arsenic toxicity vary with the
valency form of the  element, the trivalent state being approximately 4-fold
more toxic than pentavalent  arsenic.   Oral ID™ values for trivalent arsenic
vary from  15 to  293  mg/kg b.w.  in  rats and from 10-150 mg/kg in other test
species.
     While a number of  outbreaks of acute  arsenic poisoning have  been des-
cribed, few data  exist  on  actual doses  andi type of  arsenical  involved.  One
report has estimated  the human lethal   dose to  be anywhere  from 70  to 180 mg
for arsenic trioxide.
2.3.2  Chronic Toxicity
     Two categories  of  chronic arsenic  toxicity can be discerned  from  the
available  literature:  1)  the  carcinogenicity/mutagenicity  of  arsenic; and  2)
various non-carcinogenic chronic effects.
2.3.2.1  Carcinogenesis/Mutagenesis of Inorganic Arsenic—The  current status
of inorganic arsenic  as  a  human and experimental animal carcinogen has  been
extensively and critically reviewed by public  agencies such as the National
Institutes of Occupational  Safety  and  Health,  scientific bodies such as the
National  Academy  of  Science and the  International  Agency  for Research  on
Cancer, and in a number of individual  assessments.
     At present, the collective  evidence for an etiological  role of inorganic
arsenic in human cancers is strongest for cancers of the skin and lung.


013AS5/A                             2-11                             June 1983

-------
     In man, chronic oral  exposure to arsenic induces a sequence of changes in
skin epithelium, proceeding  from  hyperpigmentation  to hyperkeratosis charac-
terized as  keratin  proliferation  of  a verrucose nature, and leading in some
cases to late onset skin cancers.   The skin cancers  can be histopathologically
characterized as either squamous  carcinomas  in the  keratotic areas or basal
cell carcinomas.
     Arsenic-associated skin cancers,  regardless  of type of exposure,  differ
from those  having  an  ultraviolet  light etiology in  that they  occur on un-
exposed areas such  as the palms and  soles and occur  as multiple lesions.   The
latency period for such lesions has been reported to range from 13 to 50 years
for arsenical medicinally induced  skin cancer.   The most  reliable  study  of
skin cancer  associated with arsenic-contaminated drinking water found the
human latency period to be 24 years.
     Lung cancers  associated with  occupational  exposure to arsenic appear to
be mainly of  the  poorly differentiated and  small-cell undifferentiated epi-
dermoid carcinoma  type, although well-differentiated epidermoid carcinoma  and
acinar-type adenocarcinoma have also  been noted.  The  latency period for such
lung cancer due to occupational arsenic exposure at smelters has been reported
to range from 13 to 50 years.
      While other  visceral cancers  have also been  claimed  to  be associated
with arsenic  exposure,  the  data base for such association is less conclusive
than for cancers of skin and lung.
2.3.2.1.1   Human Epidemiology  of  Arsenic Carcinogenesis.   Disease-producing
inorganic arsenic  exposures  have  been demonstrated  in both  occupational and
non-occupational populations  for  copper  smelters,  metallurgical  processing
plants, contaminated  drinking  water,  accidental  food poisoning, the manu-
facture and  agricultural  uses  of pesticides  and therapeutic  uses  of  arsenical
drugs.

013AS5/A                             2-12                             June 1983

-------
     Major health end points  strongly  associated with arsenic exposures in-
clude general  mortality,  lung cancer mortality,  skin cancer,  peripheral  vascu-
lopathy,  hyperkeratosis  and dermatitis.   Of these,  cancer of  the  lung and skin
have received the most  attention.   Furthermore, epidemiological  reports re-
lating to  arsenic  exposures  have  a wide  geographical  distribution, with
studies in the United States, Europe, Asia and South America.
     Lung Cancer
     An excess mortality  in  respiratory cancer has been noted among smelter
workers and among workers  engaged  in the production and  use of arsenical pes-
ticides.   In  a  number of these studies, the levels of exposure are uncertain
and there  is  simultaneous exposure to agents such as other metals and sulfur
dioxide.   Furthermore, some  of these studies did  not  take  into  account the
effects of cigarette smoking.
     A proportionate mortality study of an  English factory which manufactured
arsenite as a sheep  dip powder found that workers at the facility had a pro-
portion of  lung  cancer  deaths twice that for other workers in the geographic
area. Of  the  total  factory group, the  chemical  workers,  who were the  most
closely associated with  the  arsenite production,   accounted  for  all  of the
lung cancer deaths and had a higher proportion of deaths from all cancers than
the  total  factory population.  Air  exposure information was limited,  high
                      3
levels up  to  4 mg As/m   having been  reported only  for  1945-1946.   The outcome
of the earlier  English  study  has been supported by studies of two facilities
in the  United States.   At one facility manufacturing lead-, calcium-,  and
magnesium  arsenate  and  copper acetoarsenite  over  the  period 1919-1956, the
ratio of  observed-to-expected  lung cancer deaths among workers was evaluated
on the basis of exposure level, giving ratios ranging up to 7:1 in the highest
exposure category.
013AS5/A                             2-13                             June 1983

-------
     The second U.S.  facility,  in  Baltimore, MD,  has been the subject of two
occupational studies.  At  this  operation,  production of lead-,  calcium-, and
sodium arsenate was  started  in  the early 1950s.  Air levels of arsenic were
not available.  In  the  most  recent report --a followup of  workers  employed
from 1946 to 1974 — statistically  significant increases in lung cancer deaths
were found  predominantly in arsenical production workers employed before 1946
and with more than 25 years of employment.   Information on smoking history was
not obtained.
     Occupational  exposure to arsenic  also  occurs in smelters.  Several re-
ports have centered on workers at a copper smelter in the  State of Washington.
In the most recent  publication  concerning cancer  deaths at this facility,  an
increase in  overall mortality, a significant  increase in cancer deaths, and a
highly signficant increase in deaths  from lung cancer were noted.  Although
cigarette smoking was not taken  into account, a clear lung cancer dose response
by arsenic exposure was found.
     Other  U.S. studies  have  been  done at smelter sites in Utah and Montana.
In the Utah study, smelter workers  showed a 3-fold increase in the lung cancer
death rate  compared to  the  general  population of the  state.   Exposure to
sulfur dioxide, and  copper,  as  well  as arsenic,  were  found  to be signifi-
cantly higher  for the lung cancer cases.  Differences in smoking habits could
not explain  the excess lung cancer mortality.  Smelter workers at the Montana
smelter were found  to follow a lung cancer dose response by arsenic exposure.
Differences in smoking habits could not explain the differences in lung cancer
mortality.   There was  found  to  be  little association, if  any, between sulfur
dioxide exposure and lung cancer mortality.
013AS5/A                             2-14                             June 1983

-------
     Excess lung cancer mortality  has  also been reported for workers  in  for-
eign smelters.  Several reports have concerned the smelter facility in Sweden.
In this operation, it was found that arsenic exposure was associated with in-
creases in lung cancer deaths, the ratio being 4.6 for a work history of more
than 17 years.  Sulfur  dioxide  exposure was not found to be associated with
lung cancer, nor  could  the results be  explained by  differences in smoking
habits.  A study  of  smelter workers  in Japan has  also  reported a positive
association between smelter employment  and  lung cancer.   Workers in the high-
est exposure and  longest  follow-up category were reported to have a 25-fold
increase in lung cancer  mortality.
     Several  studies  suggest  that populations  surrounding  arsenic-emitting
sources are at a greater  risk of lung cancer.  One study found that lung can-
cer in  counties with  smelters was  significantly higher than  in counties with-
out smelters.   Another study found an association between residence in an area
surrounding an arsenic  pesticide  plant  and lung cancer mortality even after
controlling for employment  at the  pesticide plant.  Two  lung cancer mortality
studies of  populations  in  the  vicinity of smelters  are  inconclusive with
regard  to  lung cancer  risk in  the general population because  lung cancer
deaths of workers  at the smelters were included in the analyses.   It should be
noted that none of these studies addressed the effects of population migration,
however.
Skin Cancer and Precancerous Lesions
     All of the occupational  studies on arsenic were mortality studies.   Be-
cause  skin cancer  is  rarely fatal, the occupational  studies, in general, did
not find excesses  of  skin cancer.   The English study referred to in the pre-
ceding  section, however,  did note that cancer deaths among those factory
013AS5/A                             2-15                             June 1983

-------
workers with skin cancer was 13.6 percent compared to a figure of 1.3 percent
in the reference population.
     Most of the available information on the association  of arsenic with skin
cancer has  involved  non-occupational populations  in  geographical  areas as
diverse as Taiwan,  Argentina,  and northern Europe,  and has involved arsenic in
drinking water or medicinal  preparations.
     In Taiwan, exposure  started  in  1910-1920 with the availability of water
from deep wells.   In  the  most comprehensive study of this group,  37 villages
with a population  of  40,421  were surveyed in 1965 and the prevalence rate of
skin cancer categorized by  arsenic  exposure and age. The prevalence rate of
skin cancer  increased  with  both well water  arsenic  and age.   The  greatest
prevalence rate was in the >-60-years age group (192.0/1,000 subjects)  exposed
to well  water with an arsenic  content  of > 0.6 ppm.    There was  a similar
ascending gradient for hyperkeratosis, an apparent precondition for the  later
onset of skin cancer.
     In Cordoba, Argentina, arsenical  waters have also been reported  to be
associated with increased rates of skin cancer among the population using this
water.  In the  various  reports on this area,  it has been noted that over 81
percent of  persons with  "arsenical-type" skin  epitheliomas presenting  them-
selves at a particular dermatology clinic came from areas where high levels of
arsenic were  known to  be present in  the  water  supplies and where  arsenicism
among  individuals  was  known to  occur.   Lack of  information  on  the  size  of  the
populations in  each  geographic  area limit  the  conclusions  that can be  drawn
from the study, however.
     In Antofagasta,  Chile,  the presence of a  relatively high level of  arse-
nic, 0.6  ppm,  in the public drinking water from  1958 to  1970  was  shown in  a
013AS5/A                             2-16                             June 1983

-------
number of epidemic "logical  surveys  to  have resulted in a high number of skin
lesions including hyperkeratosis,  a recognized  precondition for skin cancer.
In one report  of  cases  seen and diagnosed from 1968 to 1971 in Antofagasta,
the author reported 457 patients with  various cutaneous lesions  including leu-
koderma,  melanoderma,  hyperkeratosis,  and squamous-cell carcinoma;  all  had
high arsenic content in the hair.  The number of cases for each diagnosis was
not specified.
     An investigation of  the  population  having contact with well  waters con-
taining elevated  levels of arsenic in an area  of  Oregon  did not yield any
evidence  for skin cancer  associated with such  exposure,  nor did a  similar
study in Utah.   The  population sample sizes of the  Oregon  and  Utah studies
were too small to detect  the increase in  skin cancer prevalence that would be
predicted from  the Taiwanese study, however.
     The  chronic  ingestion of  trivalent  arsenic  present in the  medicinal
preparation, Fowler's  Solution, has  been shown to be associated with the
typical arsenic  dermatopathology,  including skin  cancer.   In one detailed
study of patients with  a  history of Fowler's Solution use,  21 cases of skin
cancer and  106 cases  of hyperkeratoses  were found among 262 subjects.  Both
the hyperkeratosis and  skin cancer prevalence rates were found to  increase as
the total ingested amounts of  the arsenical increased.  The minimal latency
period for  hyperkeratosis  was  2.5 years  while the minimal  latency period for
skin cancer was 6 years, with an average  of 14 years.
     Internal  neoplasms associated with  arsenic exposure have been reported  in
subjects  exposed  to medicinal  arsenic as well  as  in such occupational  groups
as vintners and smelter workers.
013AS5/A                             2-17                             June 1983

-------
2.3.2.1.2  Experimental studies of arsenic carcinogenesis.   In summary, arse-



nic carcinogenicity in test animals,  using different chemical  forms,  routes of



exposure, and various experimental species, has not been documented.  Part of



the difficulty may  lie  in  the selection of an appropriate  animal  model.   The



absence of skin cancers  in the experimental animals used could be accounted



for by their  skin  being  poor models  of human skin.   Rat results  must be con-



sidered suspect because  the  rat is anomalous in how it handles arsenic meta-



bolically.



     In mice, exposure to inorganic arsenic by various routes yielded negative



results.



     Some data exist to suggest that inorganic arsenic may be a co-carcinogen,



particularly with benzo(a)pyrene.



2.3.2.1.3  Arsenic mutagenesis.  Both i_n vivo and i_n vitro mutagenic responses



have been documented for tri- and pentavalent arsenic and these have taken the



cytological form of both chromosomal  and point mutation disturbances.



     In  a  recent,   detailed  study of  Swedish  smelter workers, chromosomal



responses consisting  of  gaps,  chromatid aberrations, and chromosomal aberra-



tions were ranked  with respect to degree of arsenic exposure as well as such



factors  as age,  employment period, and smoking habits.  The frequency of all



aberrations was  higher in  all worker  categories  than  in the control group.



However, the  correlation between  frequency of aberrations and arsenic exposure



was not very  good.  No isolated effect of smoking was noted.



     Chromosomal aberrations  were studied in cultured  lymphocytes  from sub-



jects  treated with arsenic,  mainly for psoriasis.   The incidence of aberra-



tions  in the  form  of  secondary  constrictions, gaps  and  broken chromosomes were



very significantly higher  than in a  control  group  of psoriatic  and eczemous



patients.










013AS5/A                              2-18                             June  1983

-------
     Both arsenate and arsenite  appear  to impair DNA repair processes in E.
coli  and human epidermal  cells  after UV irradiation,  while arsenate has  been
cited as  inhibiting  human lymphocyte transformation  by  retarding  thymidine
uptake into DNA.
     Exposure of cells in  culture  to varying levels  of arsenic produces the
same chromosomal changes  that  are  seen  in subjects exposed to arsenic.  The
magnitude of  these effects  is  greater  for trivalent arsenic than  for the
pentavalent form.
2.3.2.2  Chronic Neurological Effects of Arsenic Exposure—Both peripheral  and
central nervous system effects have been documented in man and animals exposed
to inorganic arsenic.
     Peripheral nervous system effects  have been noted in  workers occupation-
ally exposed  to arsenic  and in individuals accidentally exposed to foodstuff
arsenic.  Some of  these  effects  follow an insidious course, appearing months
or years after  onset  of  exposure.   Effects are of both the sensory and motor
types,  sensory  deficits  manifesting themselves  first.   The resulting poly-
neuropathies  tend  to  follow a slow course of recovery over months  or  years.
     More subtle  neurological effects,  such as  neuromuscular  disturbances  and
altered  nerve  conduction  velocity  have  also been  reported by various  inves-
tigators.
     While there  are  documented  cases of central  nervous  system effects in
children due  to acute  or  subacute  exposure, chronic arsenic intoxication as a
factor  in  such  abnormalities as hearing  impairment has  not been confirmed.
     Few useful animal models  exist for  the central  and peripheral nervous
system  effects  seen  in humans.   One study has reported evidence of CMS  func-
tional  deficits in rats  exposed to arsenic trioxide  aerosol, while a  second
013AS5/A                             2-19                             June 1983

-------
report claims impaired behavioral responses in rats given arsenic trioxide by
mouth.   Since  rats  handle arsenic differently than  all  other species, the
significance of these data is not clear.
2.3.2.3   Cardiovascular  Effects  of Arsenic  Exposure—Cardiovascular  effects
associated with chronic  arsenic  intake  include the Blackfoot Disease seen in
Taiwanese consuming well water having elevated arsenic.  This is a peripheral
vascular disease leading  to  gangrene  of the extremities.  Since ergotamine-
like compounds were also present in  the  waters, the conclusive role for arsenic
is not clear.   Peripheral  vascular  changes  have been documented among German
vintners who were exposed occupationally to arsenic pesticides as well as ar-
senic in wine.
 2.3.2.4  Other Systemic Effects of  Arsem'c--Non-cancerous respiratory effects
of  inorganic  arsenic are mainly seen with occupational  exposure  and with
arsenic trioxide.    In  one  study of  smelter workers, those  handling  refined
arsenic showed  nasal  septum  perforation  and rhinopharyngolaryngitis  while
workers in  roaster,  furnace  and converter areas showed tracheobronchitis and
pulmonary insufficiency.
     Teratogenic effects  of  arsenic  compounds  at relatively high exposure
levels have  been demonstrated in a  number  of  animal species, including  ham-
sters,  rats,  and  mice.   Generally,  such effects  have  been  observed  after
parenteral  administration of either  arsenite or arsenate.  Oral exposures of
animals to  these same  arsenic  compounds at  lower  doses,  by contrast,  have not
been shown  to  produce  any notable effects  on  reproduction  and development.
There is little evidence that inorganic arsenic is a human teratogen.
     Hepatic  effects  have been  noted in a number of  studies dealing with
chronic intake  of  arsenic.   These disturbances  take  the  form of  cirrhosis and
portal hypertension.  One complicating factor in occupational exposure assess-
ment has been the effect of  alcohol  consumption.

013AS5/A                             2-20                              June 1983

-------
     Chronic exposure  to  arsenic via  well  water contaminated by  arsenic,
medicinals,  or in the  workplace,  produces a reversible anemia.   Rats, mice,
and cats fed either  arsenite  or arsenate show reduced hemoglobin production
via disturbance of the ALA-synthetase  and heme synthetase steps in the heme
biosynthetic pathway.
     Renal  effects seen with  arsenite  or arsenate exposure in either man or
animals have been poorly characterized.
2.3.3  Factors Affecting Arsenic Toxicity
     The most widely recognized and studied interactive behavior of arsenic is
with selenium, the pair being antagonistic in effect  in  all  animal species
studied.  Dietary arsenic supplementation is known to protect against selenium
toxicity, while  selenium  protects against either  tri-  or  pentavalent  arsenic.
Arsenite shows a  protective effect  for selenite toxicity  in cell cultures  but
the reverse does not appear to be the case.
     Little  data  exists  for  interactive relationships between arsenic  and
other  elements.   One report notes that  cadmium and  arsenic given  simultane-
ously  by the oral  route retarded weight gain  in young  adult rats to a greater
extent than either element given alone.
2.4  ARSENIC AS AN ESSENTIAL ELEMENT
     Inorganic arsenic appears to be  an  essential  element in certain animal
species—rats,  goats,   chicks,  and  minipigs--based  on the observation  of
detrimental effects  using diets  deficient in the  element.
     In  rats,  arsenic-deficient diets  in pregnant  dams  are associated with
slow growth,  enlarged  spleens, erythrocyte dysfunction  in post-weaning off-
spring, and greater  perinatal  mortality.
 013AS5/A                              2-21                              June  1983

-------
     In studies using goats  and minipigs,  diets having  less  than  50 ppb As
produced effects in the  adult  animals as well  as in their offspring.   Morta-
lity of adult  goats was  increased as was the mortality of both kids and pig-
lets.   In chicks, arsenic  deprivation influenced the effects of dietary ar-
ginine, manganese,  and  zinc, the  fluctuations  of  which variously affected
metabolic activity.
     Remaining to be  independently demonstrated are a physiological  role for
arsenic,  the existence of any specific carrier  in the body, or arsenic essen-
tiality in man.
2.5  HUMAN HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT FOR ARSENIC
     This portion of the summary contains the data summarized earlier, placed
in a perspective of  the  possible quantitative risk posed to the general  popula-
tion of the  United  States  by arsenic exposure.  Categories of consideration
include (1)  levels  of arsenic  in media  relevant to the U.S. population; (2)
those effects  relevant to the general population; (3) indicators of exposure,
specifically  "internal  dose" measures;  (4)  dose-effect  and  dose-response
relationships which can be determined from available  information; and (5) the
identification of groups within the general  population who may be at increased
risk for the health  effects of arsenic.
2.5.1  Exposure Aspects  of Arsenic
     Arsenic exposure in  the general  population of the United States occurs
via inhalation and ingestion of water and food.
     Respiratory intake of arsenic on a  daily basis is  approximately 0.12 ug,
of which  0.03  ug  would  be absorbed, assuming 30 percent absorption and based
                                                  3
on a 1981 national  average air  value  of  0.006 ug/m  of  air  and a daily  venti-
lation rate of 20 m .
013AS5/A                             2-22                             June 1983

-------
     Since much of the  U.S.  drinking water supply is  below  the  10 ug/liter
level,  daily consumption  of  water at a rate  of  2 liters would  lead  to  an
intake  <  20 ug.
     Based on FDA figures from 1975 to 19/6,  daily arsenic intake from food is
approximately 50 ug  (elemental  arsenic)  for adults.   If one  assumes at least
80 percent absorption of  this daily intake,  approximately 40  ug is the ab-
sorbed  amount.    It should be  noted,  however,  that arsenic in certain  foods  is
known to  be  in  a chemically  complex form that  is relatively  resistant to
metabolism and toxicologically  inert and,  consequently, is  rapidly excreted
intact.    Therefore,  the amount  of absorbed  food arsenic considered  to be
toxicologically  significant  is  relatively  small  compared to total arsenic
intake.
     Cigarette smoking contributes about 6 ug/pack of cigarettes in mainstream
smoke,  of which approximately 2.0/ug pack would be absorbed.
     Thus, the aggregate  absorbed amount is  approximately < 60  ug for non-
smokers.   However, the  actual amount of toxicologically  significant  arsenic
taken in daily would probably be closer to 20 ug or less.
2.5.2  Effect/Response Aspects of Arsenic
2.5.2.1  Relevant Health Effects—General  population concerns are with effects
arising from long-term exposure to moderate levels of arsenic.
     One can rank health effects germane to the general population as follows:
     1.    Respiratory tract cancer.
     2.    Skin cancer.
     3.    Non-cancerous skin  lesions.
     4.    Peripheral neuropathological effects.
     5.    Cardiovascular changes.
     Cancer of the  respiratory  system is clearly associated with exposure  to
arsenic via  inhalation.  This  association  has been especially  noted among
013AS5/A                             2-23                             June 1983

-------
workers engaged in  the  production  and usage of pesticides and among smelter



workers.   The latency period for lung cancer due to occupational  arsenic expo-



sure has  been reported to range from 13 to 50 years.



     Cancer of the  skin  has been found as a dose-dependent effect in a Tai-



wanese population with  lifetime exposure to well  water  arsenic  as well as



among people who were treated with  large doses of arsenite for skin disorders.



Arsenic-associated skin cancers occur on areas of the body generally unexposed



to the ultraviolet  light of the sun, such as the palms of hands  and soles  of



feet.  The  latency  period for skin cancer has been reported to range from  13



to 50 years for arsenical medicinally-induced cancer.  In the Taiwanese drink-



ing water study, the latency period was reported to be about 24 years.



     The  International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has concluded that



there is sufficient evidence that  inorganic compounds are both lung and skin



carcinogens in humans.



     Hyperkeratosis and hyperpigmentation, sometimes with precancerous changes,



have been  a common  finding  in  persons  ingesting arsenic.   These skin lesions,



like the manifest  cancer, develop  on surfaces usually unexposed to sunlight.



     Peripheral nervous  system effects  range  from  sensory-motor deficits with



higher exposure to  changes  in electromyography and nerve conduction velocity



at long-term, low levels  of contact with arsenic.



     Vascular  effects,  such as  Blackfoot  Disease  (peripheral vasculopathy)



have been  noted  in  a Taiwanese population having  life-long arsenic exposure;



however,  these effects may  have been confounded by the presence of ergotamine-



like compounds.   Peripheral vascular changes have also  been  found in  German



vintners exposed  occupationally to arsenic pesticides as  well as  arsenic  in



wine.
013AS5/A                             2-24                             June 1983

-------
2.5.2.2  Dose-Effect/Dose-Response Relationships—The general question of how
to define and employ a dose factor in attempts at quantitative assessments of
human health risk  for  any toxicant is highly dependent upon 1)  the available
information on the body's ability to metabolize the agent,  and 2) the assess-
ment of the relative utility of various internal  indices of exposure.
     The time period over which a given total intake occurs is  highly impor-
tant.  For example, intake of one gram of arsenic over a period  of years would
be quite different  pathophysiologically from assimilating this  amount at one
time, the  latter probably having a lethal outcome.  This  time-dependent beha-
vior is  related in part to the  relative  ability of the  body to detoxify inor-
ganic arsenic by methylation as a function of both dose and time.
     In cases of acute and sub-acute exposure, indicators of internal  exposure
such as  bood  or  urine  arsenic  levels are probably appropriate for  assessing
the  intensity of exposure.
     With chronic, low-level exposure, however, the available data would indi-
cate that  the total  amount assimilated  is  probably  more important than an
indicator concentration without knowledge  of the total  exposure  period.  An
added problem  is  the background level of arsenic  found  in some indicators due
to dietary  habit.   Therefore,  in low-level chronic exposures, arsenic levels
in blood or urine would  only be moderately increased over  background levels.
Hair arsenic  levels cannot be  employed as  reliable indicators of  exposure
because no methods exist  for distinguishing external contamination  levels from
those accumulated via absorption and metabolic distribution.
     Given  the above limitations  concerning the  use  of  blood, urinary or hair
arsenic  concentrations  as internal  indices  of cumulative, long-term low-level
arsenic exposure, the dose-effect/dose-response relationships summarized below
013AS5/A                             2-25                             June 1983

-------
are done so  mainly  in terms of external  arsenic  exposure levels via either



inhalation or ingestion.



     From available data,  the  Carcinogen Assessment Group (CAG) of the U.S.



Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)  has estimated carcinogenic unit risks



for both  air and water  exposures  to arsenic.  The  quantitative  aspect  of



carcinogen risk  assessment is  included  here because it  may  be of use in



setting regulatory  priorities,  evaluating the  adequacy  of technology-based



controls,  and other aspects  of the regulatory decision-making process.   How-



ever,  the imprecision of presently available  technology for estimating cancer



risks  to humans  at  low  levels of exposure should  be recognized.   At best,



the linear extrapolation model  used  (see Section 5.2.1.4) provides  a rough



but plausible estimate of  the  upper  limit of risk—that  is, with this model



it is not likely that the  true risk would be much more  than the estimated



risk,  but  it could be  considerably  lower.   The  risk estimates presented



below should  not be  regarded,  therefore, as  accurate  representations of



true cancer  risks even when  the exposures involved  are  accurately  defined.



The estimates presented may,  however,  be factored into regulatory decisions



to the extent that  the  concept of upper-risk  limits  is  found to be useful.



     The air estimates were  based  on data obtained  in five separate  studies



involving three  independently exposed worker populations.  Linear and quadra-



tic response models in both the absolute  and  relative form were fitted to the



worker data.   It was found that for the models that fit the data at the



p = .01 or better level, the  corresponding unit risk estimates  ranged  from


         -4              -2
1.05 x 10    to  1.36 x 10  .   However,  linear models were found to fit better



than quadratic models and  absolute models fit  better than  relative  models.



The CAG also  felt that  exposure to trivalent arsenic was more representative



of  low  environmental  exposure than pentavalent arsenic.   Restricting their



unit risk estimates  to those obtained from linear absolute models where exposure





013AS5/A                 -           2-26                             June 1983

-------
                                                  -3            -3
was to trivalent arsenic gave a range of 1.25 x 10   to 7.6 x 10  .   A weighted



average of the five estimates in this range gave a composite estimate of 4.29 x



ID'3.



     The unit risk  estimates  for water were based  on  an extensive drinking



water study which was  conducted in a  rural  area  of Taiwan.  An association



between arsenic in  well water and  skin cancer was observed  in the study popu-



lation.   Using the  male population,  who appeared to be more susceptible,  the



CAG estimated that  the  unit risk associated with drinking water contaminated


                                   -4
with 1 ug/£ of arsenic was 4.3 x 10  .



     To compare the air and water unit risks,  the CAG converted the exposure



units in both cases to  mg/kg/day absorbed doses,  which resulted in unit risk



estimates of 50.1 and 15.0, respectively.



     The potency of arsenic compared to other carcinogens  was  evaluated  by


                                             +3               -1
noting that an arsenic  potency of 2.25 x  10   (mMol/kg/day)   lies in the



first quartile of the  52 suspect carcinogens that have been evaluated by the



CAG.



     The U.S.  EPA  is presently  examining  information  from studies on both



patient and  general populations which have been  exposed to arsenic  via



medicinals or  drinking  water,  respectively, in  order to determine whether



quantitative dose-response  relationships can be established  for non-cancerous



skin lesions.



     While the qualitative  evidence  for peripheral  neurological effects and



cardiovascular changes in arsenic exposed populations is well-established,  the



data are insufficient for determining quantitative dose-response relationships



at the present time.



2.5.3  Populations  at Special Risk to Health Effects of Arsenic



     From a Japanese  study,  which  reported on the  poisoning of children ex-



posed to arsenic in infant milk formula,  young children may be  considered at





013AS5/A                             2-27                             June 1983

-------
risk for acute  exposure  to arsenic.   From the clinical reports published at
the time of  the mass poisoning,  as well as  those  from follow-up  studies,  a
number of signs  of  central nervous system involvement were noted  at both the
time of the  episode  and much later, with the follow-up studies showing behav-
ioral problems,  abnormal  brain wave  patterns,  marked cognitive deficits, and
severe hearing loss.
     Because children consume more water per body  weight than do  adults, the
daily intake of  arsenic  via drinking water per kilogram body weight would be
greater in children.  This might have implications regarding chronic exposure
effects in children.  However, it should be noted that serious health effects
due to chronic  exposure of arsenic in drinking water have not been found at a
greater frequency in children than adults.
     Individuals residing in the  vicinity of certain arsenic emitting sources,
e.g., certain types  of  smelters,  may be at risk for increased arsenic intake
because of both  direct  exposure  to arsenic in air and indirect exposure via
arsenic secondarily  deposited  from  air onto soil  or  other human exposure
media.  The  relative contribution  from  such indirect  exposures to increased
risk would be difficult to define, however.
     A less-defined group at risk would  be cigarette smokers due to some arse-
nic  in tobacco,  but  it is not clear  just  what the quantitative increase in
risk would be.
013AS5/A                             2-28                             June 1983

-------
                           3.   BACKGROUND INFORMATION

3.1  CHEMICAL/PHYSICOCHEMICAL ASPECTS
     Compounds of  arsenic  in various chemical  forms have most prominently
figured in  the extensive  history  of the toxicology of the element.   The
physical  properties for several  of these compounds are presented in Table 3-1.
In contrast,  the element  in  the metallic,  zero-valent form  is  of minor
toxicological interest.
     Geochemically, arsenic is  encountered  as  a component  of  sulfidic ores,
occurring as  the  arsenides and  diarsenides  of metals such as nickel,  cobalt,
and copper,  and  is  present in rocks and soils  at trace levels.   Smelting of
commercially important metal ores,  therefore, often has associated with it the
release into  the environment of significant quantities of certain arsenic
compounds.   For  example, arsenic trioxide, As^O.,, a  major  form of the element
in terms of  its  toxicological  history,  is a smelter product arising from air
roasting of metallic arsenides or arsenic-containing sulfides.
     Arsenic  trioxide, white  arsenic,  is only  slightly soluble in  water  and
other solvents which  do  not promote chemical transformation.   Its solubility
in solvents which mimic physiological media may not necessarily be the same as
for simple  solvents,   e.g.,  gastric  juice versus water.   Arsenic trioxide
sublimes,  the  process  becoming  pronounced at 135°C.   This  property  appears to
have been overlooked  through  the years in considering analytical  methods for
measuring levels  of the compound.    Dissolution of  the trioxide  in aqueous
media leads  to formation  of arsenous acid,  H^AsOo,  while  alkaline  treatment
leads to formation  of  the  arsenite ion,  AsO(OH)  ~, with both the  acid and the
salt being freely soluble in a number of solvents.
013AS1/D                           3-1                           June 1983

-------
                                                TABLE  3-1.   PHYSICAL  PROPERTIES  OF  ARSENIC AND ARSENIC COMPOUNDS
o
1 — '
00
3=
oo






00
1
IX)

Chemical name
Arsanilic acid

Arsenic
Arsenic pentoxide
Arsenic sulphide
Arsenic trioxide
Arsine
Calcium arsenate
Dimethylarsinic
acid
Lead arsenate
Atomic/
mol ecular
weight
217.07

74 92
229.84
246.04
197.84
77.95
398.08
138.00
347.12
Melting
point
(°C)
232

817 (28 atm)
(triple-point)
315 (dec.)
300
312.3
-113.5
200
720 (dec. )
Boi 1 ing
point
(°C)
—

613 (sublimes)
---
707
465
55 (dec 230)
---
—
Density
(9/cm3)
1.9571*°

5.727"1
4.32
3.43
3.738
2.695 (gas)b
1.689849 (liq
3.62
5.79
Crystal system
monoclinic needles from
water or ethanol
hexagonal , rhombic
amorphous
yellow or red monoclinic
needles (change from yellow
to red at ~170°C)
amorphous or vitreous
colourless gas
.)
amorphic powder
prism
monoclinic leaves
CAS
Number
98-50-0

7440-38-2
1303-28-2
1303-33-9
1327-53-3
7784-42-1
7778-44-1
75-60-5
7784-40-9
                   Methanearsonic
                     acid,  disodium
                     salt

                   Methanearsonic
                     acid,  monosodium
183.9
132-139
crystal 1ine
144-21-8
salt
Potassium arsenate
Potassium arsenite
Sodium arsenate
dodecahydrate
Sodium arsenite
Sodium cacodylate
161.9 115-119
180.04 288
254.8
423.93 86.6
129.91
159.98 200
— cyrstalline
2.867 tetrahedral
— powder
1.752-1.804 trigonal or hexagonal prism
1.87 powder
— cyrstalline
2163-80-6
7784-41-0
13464-35-2
7631-89-2
7784-46-5
124-65-2
                   .Vapour pressure 0.653 (200°C)
                    Specific gravity (air = 1)

                   Source:   Adapted from International  Agency for Research on Cancer (1980).
c»
GO

-------
     Arsenic pentoxide, As?05,  may  be readily prepared by nitric acid oxida-
tion of  elemental  arsenic or the trioxide.   Compared  to the trioxide, the
pentoxide has considerable solubility in water (63.0 g/100 g water), presumably
dissolving to form the relatively strong arsenic acid,  H-jAsO..   In acid media,
arsenic acid has oxidizing potential (E°=0.56V).
     The  relative  stability of  solutions  of arsenic  or arsenous  acids to
oxidation-reduction is of considerable importance in terms of valency-dependent
arsenic toxicity.   In  oxygenated media,  one would expect the pentavalent form
to dominate, while reducing media would favor the trivalent state.
     Arsenous and  arsenic acids both  form  mono-, di- and tri-metal  salts,  the
alkali-metal salts  such as  potassium  and sodium arsenite being freely  soluble
in water  and the alkaline salts such as calcium or magnesium arsenite being
slightly soluble.
     While tri-organic esters  of  the tri- and  pentavalent  arsenic  acids are
known, they  are  labile to hydrolysis and  one would expect  the mono- and di-
organic derivatives to be even more so.   This behavior has implications in the
postulated  role  of arsenate ions in  interfering with  phosphorylation reac-
tions.
     Arsine  (arsenic  trihydride,  AsH3)  is a  strong hemolytic toxicant and
probably  the most  poisonous of the arsenicals.  Although generally a minor
factor in the environmental  chemistry of arsenicals, it  can form under certain
restricted conditions, i.e., via reduction in the presence  of a  strong hydro-
gen source.
     Mono-  and  dimethyl arsenic, in  the form of methyl arsonous  and methyl
arsonic,  dimethylarsinous and  dimethylarsinic (cacodylic) acids  occur  both in
the environment  and  are  formed via i_n  vivo transformation  in many  mammalian
013AS1/D                           3-3                           June 1983

-------
species,  including man;  such  organic  arsenic  compounds  are  also  of  commercial



significance.   For  instance,  both methylarsonic  and dimethylarsinic acids,



usually in the form of the mono- or dialkali salts, are employed as herbicides



which, when  released  into the environment, may undergo reduction to the cor-



responding labile arsine compounds, CH.AsH, (methylarsine) and (CH0)0 AsH (di-
                                      •3   L-                       6 £.


methylarsine) (Arsenic.   NAS,  1977).   Like the trivalent inorganic arsenic,



methylarsonous acid can  interact with thiol groups  (as  can  cacodylic acid)  to



form the CH3-As(-S-)2 and (CH3)2-As-S groups respectively.  The physical forms



of arsenic in the  environment depend on  its  mode  of emission  and subsequent



interactions  with other materials.



     Arsenic, along with  other  trace metals,  can be mobilized in association



with airborne particles derived from  high-temperature sources  such  as fossil-



fueled power  plants,  metallurgical  smelters and blast furnaces.



     Arsenic  compounds  form insoluble  complexes  with  soils and sediments.



With soils,  the  interaction  involves clay surfaces containing amorphous alu-



minum or iron oxides  (Woolsen, 1976).



3.2  ENVIRONMENTAL CYCLING OF ARSENIC



     Inorganic arsenic  is real eased  into  the  environment from a number of



anthropogenic sources which  include  primary copper, zinc and  lead  smelters,



glass manufacturers (specifically those that add arsenic to the raw materials)



and arsenic  chemical manufacturers.   Figure 3-1 presents  a  generalized  scheme



for the geochemical cycling  of  arsenic through various  compartments  of the



environment.   The  atmosphere  is a  major conduit  for arsenic  emitted  from



anthropogenic sources to  the  balance of the cycle via wet and dry precipita-



tion processes.   The  rate of movement of  arsenic  from  the  atmosphere is not



known at present.
013AS1/D                           3-4                           June 1983

-------
 O
 I—'
 CO
CO
 I
en
c.,
c
3
in
UD
CD
CO

INHALATION OF OUST
I AND GASEOUS FORMS
. OF ARSENIC
1
1
1
1
ATMOSPHERE

t
1
1
1
BIOSPHERE
PLANTS T~^ ANIMALS
DEGRADATION


DEGRADATION ABSORPTION "«£bsS-
AND AND QfrNrifr
SOLUTION ADSORPTION 'bVfc.
I I X
VAPORIZATION
PRECIPITATION

HYDROSPHERE
WATER T"" SEDIMENTS
1 1
CHEMICAL PRECIPITATION SOLUTION I
AND SEDIMENTATION MECHANIC
OF SOLIDS , WEATHERI
I 1
OUST
• CHEMICAL
PRECIPITATION
LITHOSPHERE
ROCKS
ARSENIC -BEARING
DEPOSITS
PRECIPITATION
SOLUTION

\HO
AL
NG
SOLUTION AND
MECHANICAL
WEATHERING

PEOOSPHERE
SOILS
GLACIAL MATERIALS
i

PRECIPITATION AND

CONSOLIDATION OF SOLIDS
                                   Figure 3-1.  The generalized geochemical cycle  for  arsenic.

                                                 Source:   Union Carbide (1977).

-------
     Dry and wet  fall  onto soils may be  followed  by movement through soils
either into ground  water  or surface water.  Passage of arsenic into  surface
waters may then be followed by further transfer to sediments.
     Complicating an understanding of the environmental cycling of arsenic are
the existence of  chemical  and biochemical transformations which occur within
the cycle.
     Trivalent arsenic  in  the atmosphere can undergo oxidation to the penta-
valent state.   Such  conversion  can also occur  in  aerated  surface waters. On
the other  hand,  pentavalent arsenic in an aqueous  medium  which is somewhat
acidic is an oxidant, and in the presence of oxidizable material it will react
to form trivalent arsenic (NAS,  1977).
     One hypothesis  of  the biological cycling of  arsenic  is  presented in a
generalized scheme  set forth  in Figure 3-2.  In  this  scheme Wood (1974),
proposes that sedimentary  bacteria link arsenate to arsenite, which  in turn
may be altered to form  methyl-  and  dimethyloxy  arsenicals.  Further action  of
bacteria and molds  transform  these  intermediates to  di-and tri-methyl  arsine.
These volatile products pass into the hydrosphere and then into the atmosphere,
where  oxidative  transformation  to  dimethyl-arsinic acid  and,  further, to
inorganic arsenic occurs.
     More  recent  reports  by Andreae and co-workers (Andreae and Klump, 1979;
Andreae, 1979;  1980; 1982) dispute  this  hypothesis with  respect to  marine
environments.   In analyses performed by Andreae and other workers, no volatile
organoarsenic compounds were found  to  be formed in seawater, negating the
hypothesis  suggesting  that reductive  bromethylation resulting in volatile
compounds serves as a contributing source to the atmospheric cycle of arsenic.
013AS1/D                           3-6                           June 1983

-------
  AIR
                                                 DIMETHYLARSINE
                            TRIMETHYLARSINE
    HO
          11 BACTERIA  "  BACTERIA
          O            O
                                         II
                                           BACTERIA
                                 HO — AsT—CHr
                                      II
                                      O
    ARSENATE

SEDIMENT
ARSENITE
                                  METHYLARSENIC
                                       ACID
DIMETHYLARSINIC
     ACID
     Figure 3-2.   The  proposed biological cycle for arsenic.

     Source:  Wood (1974)
013AS1/D
                               3-7
                                                            June 1983

-------
While the  authors did note the occurrence  of biomethylation,  the observed
products were non-volatile, water-soluable  methlylated oxoacids of low toxi-
city.  Further, the  site  of biotransformation was reported to be planktonic
algae residing in the photic zone  rather than sedimentary bacteria.   Similarly
the authors noted  that  methylated species were not found in a  number of rain
samples collected  along  the Pacific coast  between 1976-1978.   Such  species
would be expected if significant ocean-to-atmosphere  transfer by biomethylation
reactions was occurring.   Andreae suggested that a global mass balance could
be constructed for the atmospheric arsenic cycle which derived  its major input
from anthropogenic rather than biogenic sources.
     Reduction and methylation  of inorganic arsenic  occurs only to a limited
extent in soils,  1-2 percent  over a period of months having been reported in
one study (Woolson, 1976).
     In terms of the relative  amounts of arsenic partitioned among the various
environmental  compartments, Suta  (1980) has  calculated that land  is the major
sink for arsenic,  accounting  for  approximately 90 percent of the dissipation
for the year  1974.   The atmosphere accounts for 7-8  percent dissipation with
the least quantity appearing in waterborne effluents.
3.3  LEVELS OF ARSENIC IN VARIOUS  MEDIA
     As was noted  in  the  previous section,  geochemical and  biological  cycling
mechanisms contribute to arsenic burden in various media.  Such burdening of a
given medium is augmented from specific sources, e.g., agro chemicals contain-
ing arsenic applied to agricultural lands.
     Available  information  on the arsenic  content of media with which man
interacts, is generally  in  the  form  of  total  amounts  of  element,  with  limited
data available  for assessing  specific chemical form.  Since the  toxicity of
arsenicals varies  with chemical  form,  any  supporting data for  determining
chemical states will be discussed in this report, however fragmentary.

013AS1/D                           3-8                           June 1983

-------
3.3.1  Levels of Arsenic in Ambient Air
     The most comprehensive data for ambient air levels of arsenic in the U.S.
are those  of the  National  Air Sampling Network conducted by  the U.S.EPA.
Measurements from  this  network are summarized in Table 3-2.   All  values were
determined from  nuclear activation  analysis of  individual 24-hour high volume
particulate samples.   As shown in Table 3-2, the number of observations avail-
able is  considerably  different from year to year.   This is due to changes in
the participation  of  state and local agencies operating the individual sites
and, for the  year  1981, only about half the samples collected have been ana-
lyzed and  reported into the network data base  at  this time.   Thus,  direct
comparison  of  the  summary  statistics  from  year to year  may  be  of limited
utility.
     A closer examination of the NASN data by site indicates that in areas not
influenced  by  copper  smelters, maximum 24-hour  concentrations do not exceed
0.1  Mg/m3.   There  are  only two exceptions  of  approximately  600  site/years
represented  in the table  where  there  were  observations above 0.1 ug/m3  --
Omaha, Nebraska, and Charleston, West Virginia.  The site in Charleston ceased
operation  after  1978, therefore, it  is difficult to interpret the single  value
above 0.1  [jg/m3.   Repeated observations above  0.1 ug/m3  have occurred at the
site in  Omaha, Nebraska.
     Using  the NASN  data  base, U.S.  annual  arithmetic  mean arsenic concentra-
tions are  plotted  in Figure 3-3.   The plot suggests considerable variability
over the five-year period with no  clear direction  of  trend.   Perhaps the most
striking feature in  the data  is the relatively low annual  arsenic level  ob-
served  in  1980.  A partial explanation for  this observation may  be the strike
which ideled  most  of the  nation's  copper smelters  from June through September
of  1980  (Eldred  et al., 1983).


013AS1/D                           3-9                            June 1983

-------
              TABLE 3-2.   CUMULATIVE FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION OF NASN
                  INDIVIDUAL 24-HOUR AMBIENT AIR ARSENIC LEVELS
Year
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
Minimum
Detection
Limit
.004
.006
.005
.007
.007
Number
of
Observations
5385
1679
1263
2934
688
Percentile3
30
0
.006
.005
0
0
50
0
.006
.005
0
0
70
.004
.008
.005
0
0
99
.048
.075
.077
.037
.058
Arithmetic
Mean (SD)
.0049
.0109
.0091
.0026
.0059
.0165
.0253
.0192
.0113
.0275
 Percentile values indicate the percentage of stations below the given air level
Values in
Source:   National  Arsenic Data Base, OAQPS/OANR, U.S.  Environmental Protection
         Agency (Akland, 1983).
013AS1/D
3-10
June 1983

-------
0.011
                    1978
1979
1980
       Figure 3-3. NASN annual average arsenic concentrations.

       Source: National Arsenic Data Base, OAQPS/OANR,
               U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
               (Akland, 1983).
                                3-11
                                June 1983

-------
     The locations of these primary copper smelters in the U.S. are listed in
Table 3-3.   Examination of the  NASN  data by individual sites shows that the
highest arsenic levels are consistently recorded in areas  of Arizona,  Montana,
Tennessee,  Texas, and Washington  which are impacted by the  copper smelting
industry.   Thus, the closure of many of these plants for a substantial period
in 1980 may  have had the effect of depressing the nationwide average  concen-
tration of arsenic in ambient air  for  that year.   Unfortunately, the possible
effect of the 1980 copper smelter strike cannot explain the low arsenic levels
observed in  that year  nationwide.   Even urban  areas in the  northeast, which
would not be  affected,  exhibited lowered concentrations and the possibility
that  the  analytical  methodology  may  have systematically  affected results
cannot be ruled out.
     Several  factors of  importance in  assessing these  data  concern the parti-
tioning of  arsenic between particulate-bound fractions and vapor material as
well  as  the  lability of  arsenic  on  air sampling  filters.   Non-particulate
arsenic would chiefly be a problem in the immediate area of smelter emissions,
adhesion to  particulates  increasing with  residence time and distance  from the
emission source.  Thompson (1976)  has  noted that all of the arsenic in the  air
in  regions  of smelters  is adhered to  particulates  when sampled 2-3 kilometers
from  the  operation.   Lao  et  al.  (1974) have  cautioned about the  hazard  of
arsenic  loss, chiefly as the trioxide, from samplers  at levels of 1.0 micro-
grams or less.   Walsh et  al. (1977), however, could not remobilize particulate
arsenic  once trapped in samplers.  Whatever  the hazard,  the NASN values are
internally  consistent,  remote  areas  having the lowest values  and regions of
smelter operations having  the highest  levels.
      An  important  consideration in assessing the significance  of air exposure
of  arsenic  to health risk is the chemical form or forms  of arsenic in the


013AS1/D                           3-12                           June 1983

-------
           TABLE 3-3.  PRIMARY COPPER SMELTERS IN THE UNITED STATES
              Location
     Company
     1.  Anaconda, Montana
     2.  Tacoma, Washington
     3.  Garfield, Utah
     4.  El Paso, Texas
     5.  McGill, Nevada
     6.  Hidalgo, New Mexico
     7.  Hurley, New Mexico
     8.  Hayden, Arizona
     9.  Hayden, Arizona
    10.  Miami, Arizona
    11.  Morenci, Arizona
    12.  Ajo, Arizona
    13.  Douglas, Arizona
    14.  San Manuel, Arizona
    15.  Copper Hill, Tennessee
    16.  White Pine, Michigan
 Anaconda Company
 Asarco, Inc.
 Kennecott Copper Corp.
 Asarco, Inc.
 Kennecott Copper Corp.
 Phelps Dodge Corp.
 Kennecott Copper Corp.
 Kennecott Copper Corp.
 Asarco, Inc.
 Inspiration Consolidated Copper Corp.
 Phelps Dodge Corp.
 Phelps Dodge Corp.
 Phelps Dodge Corp.
 Magma Copper Company
 Cities Services Company
 Copper Range Company
Source:  National Arsenic Data Base, OAQPS/OANR, U.S. Environmental Protection
         Agency (Akland, 1983).
013AS1/D
3-13
June 1983

-------
ambient air of the United States.  Work by Johnson and Braman (1975), as well
as that  of Attrep and Anirudhan  (1977),  indicate  that methylated arsenic,
possibly in significant  amounts,  has  been found in air samples,  but its pre-
sence can  likely  be  ascribed to either biotic activity or the use of methy-
lated arsenics as  herbicides.   This  is not in  total  agreement  with Andreae
(1982) who  suggests  that methylated  atmospheric arsenic is due  predominantly
to anthropogenic  sources based  upon  his studies  of marine environments.
Methylated forms become a minor factor in suburban and urban areas.
     It is  not  clear from the available data what forms of inorganic arsenic
are  in  most air samples:  trivalent,  pentavalent  or mixtures  of these two
oxidation  forms.   Crecelius  (1974) found  that rain water  samples  for an urban
area of the Western U.S.  contained only about one-third (35 percent) trivalent
arsenic.   In  a study  conducted at various sites  along  the  Pacific coast,
Andreae  (1980)  observed  wide variations  in the ratio of arsenite to arsenate
in rain.   He  attributed  this variability  to emissions  of  predominantly  penta-
valent  arsenic  from the  sea surface  and trivalent arsenic from  industrial
emissions  (particularly  those from a  copper smelter  in the Northwest),  and by
redox  reactions during the  residence  of  arsenic  in  atmospheric  particulates
and  hydrometeors.   Caution should be  exercised, however,  in interpreting  any
extrapolations  from washout  samples  to  original  air composition, given the
lability of inorganic  arsenic to  oxidation or reduction depending on aeration,
acidity  of the  rain  sample,  and   presence of oxidizable matter.
      In  summary,  then,  one  can  assume that methylated arsenic  is  of  minor
concern  in suburban  and urban/industrial air  samples,  and that the major
inorganic  portion is  a  variable  mixture of  the trivalent and  pentavalent
forms.
 013AS1/D                           3-14                          June 1983

-------
3.3.2  Levels of Arsenic in Drinking Water
     The maximum permissible  concentration  of  arsenic in U.S.  drinking water
supplies is  0.05 mg/liter  or 50 ppb (U.S.  Public Health Service, 1962), al-
though this value is currently under review (EPA,  1980).   In their survey of a
large number of community water supplies  (18,000), McCabe et al.   (1970) found
that more  than 99 percent of  the sites sampled contained less than the 10 ppb
(0.01 mg/liter) detection limit measured as total  arsenic.
     Notable exceptions to the generally favorable picture for U.S.  population
exposure to  drinking water arsenic  are isolated well water  sources associated
with geochemical enrichment  by arsenic found mainly  in the Western U.S. and
Alaska  (Arsenic.NAS,  1977;  Whanger et al. ,  1977;  Harrington  et  al. , 1978;
Southwick  et al., 1980;  1982).  Whanger  et  al. (1977)  have noted that well
water arsenic  levels  in  Lane County,  Oregon,  have ranged up to 2.2 ppm
(one well) with levels  generally  increasing with  well depth.  Harrington et
al. (1978) also noted that an area of Fairbanks, Alaska,  had well water levels
ranging as high as 10 ppm, representing geochemical input as well as  contamina-
tion by  residues  from  prior gold-mining  activity.  Southwick et al.,  (1981)
reported  levels  ranging from  0.18-0.27 ppm in desert communities in Utah.
     As with arsenic  in air,  it is  important  to take into  account available
information  regarding  the chemical  forms of arsenic in  the  potable water
supplies.  It  is  reasonable  to assume that the chief form of arsenic in most
municipal  water  supplies,  particularly surface reservoirs, would be penta-
valent arsenic due to aeration and chlorination.  Similarly, the  major form of
arsenic  in well waters  relatively enriched in arsenic have been  analyzed and
also appear to be predominantly in the pentavalent inorganic state (Whanger et
al., 1977; Harrington  et al., 1978; Southwick  et  al.,  1981).   The chemical
013AS1/D                           3-15                          June 1983

-------
character of arsenic-rich well  water in the U.S.  versus other regions of the
world will be taken up elsewhere.
3.3.3  Arsenic in Food
     Perhaps the most  useful  body of data for assessment of the contribution
of food arsenic to the total  exposure picture in the U.S.  is the recent survey
carried out  in August,  1975  to  July, 1976 by the U.S.  Food and Drug Adminis-
tration (Johnson et al. , 1981a,b).   In  Table 3-4 are summarized the average
arsenic levels  in  various adult  food classes for the  period  noted above;
values are expressed analytically as arsenic trioxide.  Corresponding average
arsenic levels in food classes of 6-month old infants and 2-year old toddlers
are summarized in Table 3-5.
     In comparing the  mean  levels in comparable food categories, it appears
that for  children and  adults,  meat,  fish and poultry constitute the greatest
dietary source of arsenic.   Within  this category,  shellfish and other marine
foods contain the highest levels of arsenic (Jelenik and Cornelieussen, 1977).
For infants, grain and cereal  products  constitute the  only known  source of
arsenic intake from the categories measured.
     Johnson et al.  (1981a)  have  calculated that the total  adult daily intake
of arsenic (as As203)  for August, 1975 to July, 1976 was approximately 65 pg.
(Corresponding elemental content  can be  obtained by multiplying  by 0.75.
Thus, the intake of  elemental  arsenic would be  50  (jg.)  This represents an
increase over the 1974 value of 21 ug reported  by  Jelenik and Corneliussen
(1977).   Differences in  the  two years can primarily be accounted for by  in-
creases in the arsenic content  of meat,  fish and  poultry;  grains  and ceral
products;  beverages;  and dairy products.   Johnson et  al.  (1981a)  did not
discuss whether the apparent increase in  arsenic levels in  certain  categories
represented a trend or merely reflected random variation from year to year.
It should be  noted,  however, that arsenic mean levels in all food  categories

013AS1/D                           3-16                           June 1983

-------
            TABLE 3-4.   LEVELS OF ARSENIC (As203) BY FOOD CLASS IN
                   ADULT FOOD COMPOSITES FROM 20 U.S.  CITIES
                          (AUGUST, 1975 - JULY, 1976)
Food Class Composite        No.  of Positive Composites    As, ppm Mean (Range)
Dairy products
Meat, fish and poultry
Grain and cereal products
Potatoes
Leafy vegetables
Legume vegetables
Root vegetables
Garden fruits
Fruits
Oils, fats and shortening
Sugar and adjuncts
Beverages (including
drinking water)
1
17
8
NDb
ND
1
1
1
ND
1
ND
1
0. 004(0. 08)a
0.19(0.03-0.46)
0.02(0.03-0.10)
	
	
0.004(0.07)
0.004(0.07)
0.005(0.10)
	
0.002(0.04)
	
0.008(0.15)
aMean values are based on 20 composites for every food class.
bND = not detected
Source:   Adapted from Johnson et al. (1981a).
013AS1/D                           3-17                          June 1983

-------
                   TABLE 3-5.   LEVELS OF ARSENIC (As203) BY FOOD CLASS IN
                           INFANT AND TODDLER FOOD COMPOSITES FROM
                         10 U.S.  CITIES (AUGUST, 1975 - JULY, 1976)
Food Class Composite
No.  of Positive Composites
       As,  ppm Mean (Range)
       InfantToddler
Water
Whole milk, fresh
Other dairy and substitutions
Meat, fish and poultry
Grain and cereal products
Potatoes
Vegetables
Fruits and fruit juices
Oils and fats
Sugar and adjuncts
Beverages
            ND
            ND
            ND(I)  7(T)
             3(1)  2(T)
            ND
            ND
            ND
            ND(I)
            ND(I)
            ND
 	             0.092 (0.06-0.29)
0.018(0.04-0.09)  0.008(0.03-0.05)
                  0.003(0.03)
                  0.004(0.04)
dND = not detected
 Mean values are based on 10 composites for every food class.
Source:  Adapted from Johnson et al. (1981a).
        013AS1/D
                 3-18
                 June 1983

-------
generally declined over  the  years  1967-1974.   Therefore,  data collected over
the past few years  (1977-present)  but,  as yet, unanalyzed,  should be closely
examined in order to  determine  whether  the increases seen in 1975-1976 have
actually constituted the beginning of a  new trend.
     In no other medium is the issue of  chemical forms of arsenic more complex
and simultaneously more  important  than  that in food, given  the fact that the
diet is  a  major,  if not the main,  source of  arsenic for most  of the U.S.
population.  As will be pointed out in a later section,  arsenic in crustaceans
and other  marine  life is present in the  form  of various chemically complex
organoarsenicals, which  appear to be not  only  resistant to metabolism but are
rapidly excreted  intact.   Comparatively speaking,  then, these  forms  are re-
garded as being toxicologically inert.
3.3.4  Arsenic in Soils
     Soil  arsenic levels  are mainly of concern in this section to the extent
that arsenic mobility and transformation in this medium allow for passage of
the element to ground water, air and the  food  chain  (via plant  uptake).  This
area has  been  reviewed in some detail  (Arsenic.  MAS, 1977; Wool son, 1977;
Walsh et al.,  1977).
     Background levels of arsenic in soils range from less than 1 ppm to above
40 ppm  and the relative  enrichment  of this  background level with  agricultural
practices  is secondary to fallout from air in the regions  of industrial ac-
tivity  and can  be of the order of  100  times.   In Table 3-6 are  listed some
comparative values for  uncontaminated soils versus soils contaminated by the
repeated  use  of defoliants  and  insecticides  containing arsenic  (Walsh  and
Keeney, 1975).
     Arsenic in  soils is usually bound to clay surfaces containing amorphous
aluminum or iron  oxides, the degree of  immobilization  (adsorption) being a


013AS1/D                           3-19                          June 1983

-------
TABLE 3-6.   A COMPARISON OF ARSENIC LEVELS IN ARSENIC-TREATED AND UNCONTAMINATED
                               SOILS IN NORTH AMERICA
Sampling
site
Colorado
Florida
Idaho
Indiana
Maine
Maryland
New Jersey
New York
North Carolina
Nova Scotia
Ontario
Oregon

Washington


Wisconsin
Total As content,
uncontaminated
soil
1.3 - 2.3
8
0 - 10
2-4
9
19 - 41
10.0
3 - 12
4
0 - 7.9
1.1 - 8.6
2.9 - 14.0
3-32
6-13
8-80
4 - 13
2.2
ppm
treated
soil3
13 - 69
18 - 28
138-204
56 - 250
10 - 40
21 - 238
92 - 270
90 - 625
1 - 5
10 - 124
10 - 121
17 - 439
4 - 103
106 - 830
106 - 2553
48
6-26
Crop
Orchard
Potato
Orchard
Orchard
Blueberry
Orchard
Orchard
Orchard
Tobacco
Orchard
Orchard
Orchard
Orchard
Orchard
Orchard
Orchard
Potatoe
aT, , ., . ...
 As pesticide or defoliant.  Soils treated experimentally are not  included.

Source:  Walsh and Keeny (1975).
013AS1/D
3-20
June 1983

-------
function of  soil  type,  soil  pH, phosphate levels, levels of iron or aluminum
as well as residence in soil.  Soil-adsorbed arsenic is rather inert to trans-
formation or movement  and it is the soluble  fraction  which is of interest,
usually in the  pentavalent form.  Pentavalent arsenic  arises  from both soil
aeration and degradation  of  methylated arsenic herbicides.   Little reductive
methylation of  arsenic  occurs in typical  soils compared  to  sediments, Wool son
(1976) observing  that only 1-2  percent  conversion of arsenate  occurred over  a
period of months.
     Transfer of  soil  arsenic  to plants entails the soluble, labile fraction
of arsenic and  the  site of uptake  is the  root system where  highest  levels are
found.  Edible  portions of most food plant  classes  are low.  This  is also the
case  for terrestrial  flora,  but marine plant life  such  as  algae accumulate
considerable levels of arsenic (Irgolic et al.,  1977).
3.3.5  Other Sources of Arsenic
     Small  and  McCants  (1962)  found an average of 1.5 ppm arsenic in tobacco
residues taken  from U.S.  tobacco grown  in soils having average arsenic levels
of 3 ppm.  Of the total arsenic content of cigarette tobacco, 10-15 percent is
in mainstream smoke (Thomas  and Collier, 1945) in  an  unidentified  form.  In
the past, levels  of up to 40 ppm  arsenic were  detected in  U.S.  cigarettes
(Holland and  Acevedo,   1966) owing to arsenical  use as  pesticides.   Lower
current levels  probably reflect curtailed use of arsenic as a pesticide in
tobacco growing.     '
     While current levels  of arsenic may be  lower in tobacco than had been the
case,  past exposure of  cigarette smokers  remains  a  health factor  in consider-
ing respiratory cancer risk given the long clinical  induction period (decades)
for this health effect (see Chapter 5).
013AS1/D                           3-21                          June 1983

-------
                             4.   ARSENIC METABOLISM

4.1  ROUTES OF ARSENIC ABSORPTION
     The significance of various routes of arsenical  intake for man and various
other animal  species  is  dependent upon the physical  and chemical  form of the
arsenical,  the  mode  of exposure, and  the  animal  species  under study.  The
major routes  that are  of significance  to general public health are inhalation
and ingestion,  either  via direct  intake of food and water  or secondary  intake
via the  inhalation of  arsenic in  a form and size where  it  is eventually swal-
lowed.    Inhalation is  probably  of more significance in  occupational settings,
while oral  intake is  the major exposure route  for the  population at large.
     Percutaneous absorption of arsenic, while poorly studied,  appears to be a
relatively  minor route of exposure except  under certain occupational  exposure
conditions.
4.1.1  Respiratory Absorption
     Some  quantitative and  qualitative  information  about  the  respiratory
deposition  and  absorption of arsenic by human  subjects have been reported.
Holland  and co-workers (1959) used a group of hospital  patients (lung cancer)
to assess  the deposition and absorption of inhaled arsenic using arsenite-
containing  cigarettes  labeled with  arsenic-74 as well  as  arsenite-containing
aerosols.   Deposition  amounted  to approximately  40 percent and  more than
three-fourths (75 to  85  percent) of the deposited arsenic  was absorbed from
the lungs  within 4  days.   While  it may be argued that the health status of
these subjects  may  have  influenced the extent  of  absorption,  it is  never-
theless  reasonable to  infer  that  relatively rapid  and extensive absorption of
arsenic from the human lung likely occurs.
013AS1/A                            4-1                          June 1983

-------
     A study of  a  group of workers (Pinto et al., 1976) exposed to airborne
arsenic in a copper smelter in 5-day test periods demonstrated average urinary
arsenic excretion values ranging from 38 to 539 ug/liter to be associated with
averages of air  levels  of arsenic ranging from 3 to 295 (jg/m  (overall  53 ug
    3
As/m ).   Urinary arsenic was  correlated with workplace air exposure (0.53,  p
<0.01).   Either direct  pulmonary  absorption or swallowing of larger parti cu-
late matter was evident as  seen from elevations of urinary arsenic within 24
hours.
     In a  later study of copper smelter workers in which urinary excretion of
arsenic was determined  as  total levels and  chemically- variant  forms,  Smith
et al.  (1977) studied control  subjects and individuals from low,  medium,  and
high arsenic exposure groups.   In that study, the variations in  concentrations
of all arsenic forms  isolated in urine--trivalent, pentavalent, methyl, and
dimethyl arsenic—were directly  correlated with levels of  airborne exposure
(the relevant  issue of  arsenic  biotransformation HI  vivo  being  discussed
elsewhere  in this  section).   An important feature of the Smith  et al .  (1977)
report was the observation  of a difference in the tightness of the correlation
between excretion  and exposure  as  a function of particle size.   Both smaller
clearly respirable  (<5  pm)  and larger less-respirable (>5 urn) arsenic parti-
cles correlated well with  excretion levels, but the less-respirable arsenic-
excretion  relationship  was  seen  to  be much  stronger than that  for the finer
mode particles.   According  to the  authors, this  is due to  the  swallowing of
the  large  particle fraction and significant  absorption  from the GI tract.
     Some  animal  data have  also been reported  on arsenic absorption via the
respiratory tract.   Bencko  and Symon (1970) observed that hairless mice breath-
                              '                        3
ing a solid aerosol  of  fly ash containing 180 pg As/m  for several weeks  had
013AS1/A                            4-2                          June 1983

-------
increases in tissue arsenic values.   Since the particle size was determined to
be only  less  than  10 urn, Part of this  intake may have occurred via the GI
tract.    Increases  in tissue arsenic in two exposure groups also occurred when
rats were exposed to arsenic trioxide (condensation aerosols:  1.0,  3.7,  and 46
    o
ug/m ) for 90 days (Rozenshtein,  1970).
     Relatively rapid absorption  of  pentavalent arsenic (arsenate solution)
was noted by Dutkiewicz (1977) when rats were exposed intratracheally (arsenate
solution labeled with arsenic-74; 0.1 and 4.0 mg/kg).   Arsenic  tissue distri-
bution dynamics  were similar  for intratracheal  and  companion intravenous
exposure studies,  indicating  that the rate  of  intratracheal  arsenic uptake
more closely  resembles  that from parenteral  administration than do  oral  or
percutaneous exposures.
     The pulmonary  retention  of  arsenic  compounds with  different solubilities
has recently been studied by two research groups.
     Inamasu  et  al.  (1982) gave  61  male Wistar  rats  single intratracheal
instillations of arsenic  trioxide or calcium arsenate  suspended in phosphate
buffer (pH  6.9).   Controls (19)  were  given  instillations of the  phosphate
buffer solution.   The  total  dose of arsenic  administered  to  each  animal was
about 2  mg  in 0.2 ml suspensions.
     Four to five of the arsenic exposed animals were killed at intervals from
15 minutes  to 168 hrs  after  instillation.   The average amounts of  arsenic
recovered in  lungs of  rats at 15 minutes  after the instillation  of calcium
arsenate and  arsenic trioxide were 1146 ug  and  620  jjg, respectively.   After
24 hrs,  almost all  of the  deposited  arsenic  trioxide  had  disappeared from  the
lungs, whereas only about  50  percent  of  the  calcium  arsenate  had been cleared
as shown in Figure 4-1.
013AS1/A                            4-3                          June 1983

-------
100


 50
 10
UJ
fc
cc
o
z
UJ
 0.1
     TTM      r
                                    CALCIUM ARSENATE
                                   ARSENIC TRIOXIDE
        JLI  I
                                                             -i
                            CONTROL LEVEL
      0 3 6  12    24          48

                     TIME AFTER INSTILLATION, hours
                                                        96
168
    Figure 4-1. Arsenic retention in rat lungs following intratracheal instil-
    lation of a single dose. Percentage values are based on the average
    amount of arsenic present in rat lungs at 15 minutes after instillation of
    arsenic trioxide (--•--) or calcium arsenate (—*—). Vertical bars: means ±
    S.D.

    Source: Inamasu et al. (1982).
                                4-4
                                                                 June 1983

-------
     Of the  small  remaining amount of arsenic trioxide, most gradually dis-
appeared over  the  next  several  days declining to a  level of 5.6 ug at 168 hrs
after instillation,  a  level slightly  higher than that  seen  in  the controls
(1.3 (jg).    In  contrast, calcium arsenate  remained  at about  the same level
168 hrs after  instillation as  was  observed after 24 hrs (768 ug), clearly
demonstrating  a  much higher level  of retention compared to arsenic trioxide.
     In the study by Pershagen et al.  (1982), male Syrian golden hamsters were
given four weekly intratracheal instillations of suspensions of arsenic triox-
ide, arsenic trisulfide and calcium arsentate in doses  of 0.3, 0.5 and 0.5 mg
as arsenic,  respectively.   The  suspensions  were made  in 0.9 percent NaCl, and
sulfuric acid  was added  accordingly  to equalize the acidity of  the  three
different suspensions.   Twenty  animals were assigned  to each treatment group.
Five animals in  each group were killed immediately after the first instilla-
tion.  Two to five animals were then killed one week after two or four instil-
lations and two weeks after four instillations.
     The mortality was  highest  among the animals exposed to arsenic trioxide.
In this group, 9 of  the remaining  11 animals not sacrificed for tissue analy-
sis had died by  the  week following the third instillation.  In contrast, at
the  second  instillation, two  animals  died  in the  group receiving arsenic
trisulfide but no  further deaths  occured in this group.   A  total of three
animals receiving  calcium  arsenate died during the first week following the
fourth  instillation.   Aside from those animals  specifically  sacrificed for
tissue analysis,  no other deaths occurred in this group either.
     In the  lungs, the  amount of arsenic was 386,755  and 866 mg/kg wet weight
immediately following instillation  of  arsenic  trioxide, arsenic sulfide and
calcium arsenate,  respectively.  One  week  after the  second instillation the
013AS1/A                            4-5                          June 1983

-------
amounts were 0.81, 9.2  and  579 mg/kg,  respectively.   In Figure 4-2 it can be
seen that  after the  fourth  instillation the differences  between  arsenate
exposed animals and the other groups was even more pronounced.   Examination of
the lungs  revealed severe  lung damage  only among animals exposed to calcium
arsenate.   In  all  groups,  areas with epithelial  hyperplasia  and  metaplasia
were seen.
     Although different species and different time intervals were used in  the
above studies,  the results  were very consistent, i.e.  arsenic trioxide  was
rapidly cleared from the  lungs,  whereas calcium arsenate was very slowly
eliminated.  The differences  appear to  be related to the relative solubility
of the compounds, calcium arsenate having the lowest solubility.  The doses in
these two experiments were of the same  magnitude, but the lung damage reported
by Pershagen et al.  among  the arsenate-exposed animals might have influenced
the clearance  mechanisms.   In addition, the possibility of higher acidity in
the suspensions used by  Pershagen  et  al.  may also  have  had  an influence.
     The large  differences  in retention of arsenic compounds demonstrated in
these two studies are of great interest  in relation to the association between
airborne arsenic and  lung  cancer.   These differences  in  retention  might  ex-
plain the  relatively  high  concentration of arsenic found in deceased smelter
workers whose  last exposure to arsenic  occurred many years prior  to  death
(Brune  et  al. ,  1980)  (see Section  4.4).  These  workers were  thought to  be
exposed to arsenic trioxide, but it may  be that the retained fraction noted in
the lungs was another arsenic  compound of less solubility.
013AS1/A                            4-6                          June 1983

-------
       1000
    o>
    £
    O)
    z
    ID
100
         10
                   I     I     I    I
               I     I
              0*   1*   2»   3*   4   5

                   WEEK ("instillation)

Figure 4-2. Lung concentrations of arsenic in hamsters
given weekly intratracheal instillations of arsenic tri-
oxide (•), arsenic trisulfide (•), or calcium arsenate (*)
(bars indicate ±1 S.D.). Animals at Week 0 were killed
immediately following the first instillation; other
animals were killed either 1 or 2 weeks after an
instillation.

Source:  Pershagen et al. (1982).
                     4-7
                                                   June
1983

-------
4.1.2  Gastrointestinal  Absorption
     In both man and experimental  animals,  factors which govern the absorption
of arsenic  from  the  gastrointestinal  tract include the chemical form of the
element, its physical characteristics,  and dosing level.   It  can  be  stated
that soluble arsenicals will  be  generally more extensively absorbed than the
insoluble forms.   On the  other  hand,  one should be  cautious  in  extending
correlations of simple water solubility to the chemical  milieu existing in the
GI tracts of various species.
     Taken collectively, the reports of Coulson et al. (1935), Ray-Bettley and
O'Shea (1975), Crecelius  (1977),  Mappes (1977), and  Buchet et al.  (1981a,b)
demonstrate that very substantial  absorption  of soluble inorganic  trivalent
arsenic from the GI  tract into the blood  stream  typically occurs.  Greater
than 95 percent  of inorganic  arsenic taken orally by man  appears to be ab-
sorbed, with less than 5 percent of the administered amount appearing in feces
(Coulson et al., 1935; Ray-Bettley and O'Shea, 1975).
     Consistent with the above observations, Mappes (1977)  observed that daily
oral intake of an aqueous solution of around 0.8 mg trivalent arsenic resulted
in a daily  urinary excretion  of 69 to  72  percent of the  daily dose  in  one
subject.  Also,  Crecelius  (1977)  reported that ingestion  of  50 ug  trivalent
and 13 |jg pentavalent inorganic arsenic in a wine sample led to the appearance
of 80 percent of all the ingested arsenic in urine within 61 hours.  Crecelius
(1977),  however,  reported that  ingestion  of well water mainly containing
identified  pentavalent  inorganic  arsenic led  to urinary clearance  of  half  the
intake within approximately 3 days.
     More recently,  Buchet et al.  (1981b) found that daily arsenic excretion
in human volunteers  exposed to the dose range 125-1000 yg/day amounted to 60
013AS1/A                            4-8                          June 1983

-------
percent of the dose.   Steady  state was achieved within 5 days after arsenic
dosing began.
     In contrast to the relatively high absorptive rate for soluble inorganic
arsenic, Mappes (1977)  reported  that insoluble arsenic triselenide (As2$e3),
when taken orally,  passes  through the GI tract with  negligible  absorption.
     Arsenic  intake  via the diet  of  non-occupationally  exposed  populations
requires that one  consider the issue of bioavailability.   Arsenic in food-
stuffs  is  probably incorporated into the matrix  of  these commodities in a
variety of ways.
     The  so-called "shrimp" arsenic  present  in  crustaceans and other fish
appears to  represent  a complex organic  form of the element  which has  prompted
considerable recent study  (LeBlanc and Jackson, 1973; Westoo and Ryda'lv, 1972;
Munro,  1976;  Edmonds  et al.,  1977;  Penrose  et al.,  1977;  Crecelius,  1977;
Edmonds and  Francesconi,  1977).   In  brief, the results of  such studies indi-
cate  that  the arsenic present in  shellfish and other marine foods appears to
be  extensively absorbed and rapidly excreted intact as a  complex organoarseni-
cal  by man and animals, and,  as  such,  does not  appear to  pose a  particular
health threat to man.
      Studies  of  the oral   intake  and  absorption of arsenicals  in experimental
animals have  also  been conducted  and generally  confirm the findings  derived
from  the  above human  studies.  More  specifically, soluble  inorganic  arsenic,
delivered  as  either trivalent or  pentavalent  solutions,  is almost completely
absorbed  from the  GI  tract of rats  (Coulson  et al. , 1935), with  88  percent
absorption  being observed  for  arsenic trioxide solution  (Urakabo et al. ,  1975;
Dutkiewicz,  1977)  and 70  to 90 percent for arsenate  solution.   Similar obser-
vations  have been  made for pigs (Munro et al. ,  1974),  with 90 percent  of
 013AS1/A                             4-9                           June  1983

-------
arsenic trioxide  solution  being  absorbed,  and monkeys  (Charbonneau  et  al.,
1978a), with 98 percent of arsenic trioxide being absorbed.   Also,  Charbonneau
et al.  (1978b) fed  arsenic-containing  fish (Atlantic  grey  sole)  to adult
female monkeys as  a  homogenate  (1 mg fish arsenic/kg body weight) and noted
that about  90  percent  of the intake was absorbed, of which  about  75 percent
appeared in urine  after  14 days.   In a  related  study,  swine and adolescent
monkeys were seen to absorb approximately 70 and 50 percent,  respectively.   On
the other  hand,  arsenic  trioxide  in suspension  given orally to rabbits and
rats was reported to result in only about 40 and 30 percent absorption,  respec-
tively (Ariyoshi and Ikeda, 1974).
4.1.3  Transplacental Passage
     Potential fetal exposure to  toxic elements  via  the mother  is  a  matter of
major  importance  given  the potential sensitivity of  i_n utero development  to
deleterious impacts of exogenous toxic agents.
     In a  study  of maternal-newborn blood groups  for  arsenic,  Kagey et al.
(1977)  reported  that cord blood levels  approximate  those  of mothers in 101
subject sets.   Tissue  analysis  (Kadowaki,  1960) of  fetus  arsenic  in a pre-
sumably healthy  Japanese population  indicated measurable  element levels  by at
least  month four of gestation which increased to month seven.   Of importance
here  is the observation that brain  levels,  as well  as  those of bone,  liver,
and skin,  were the highest of all tissue tested.
     Complicating  the  issue  is  the chemical  nature of the tissue  arsenic
assayed in either  of the two studies noted above,  in as much as  precise  chemi-
cal speciation was not attempted.  Also, the  Japanese study  presumably did not
select material  in a manner such  that  dietary histories  could  be  discerned.
Thus,  questions  can be  raised regarding implications of  these  data  for  feto-
toxicity.


013AS1/A                             4-10                             June 1983

-------
     Transplacental  transfer of arsenic has also been demonstrated in experi-
mental animals.   Transplacental  transfer of arsenate administered parenterally
in hamsters has  been demonstrated by Perm's laboratory (Perm,  1977;  Hanlon and
Perm, 1977).  The movement  was  rapid,  with embryonic tissues showing levels
close to those  in maternal  blood 24 hours  after  dosing.   Trivalent arsenic
exposure results  in transplacental passage  in  pregnant rats.  Arsenic was
detected in  newborn rats when the dams  received arsenic trioxide  in the diet.
4.2  BIOTRANSFORMATION PROCESSES IN VIVO
     An  understanding  of  the metabolism of  inorganic  arsenic by man and  a
number of  other species  is  substantially complicated  by  a series of newly-
revealed biotransformations,  including  methylation of inorganic arsenic.   It
is thus appropriate to discuss i_n vivo transformation processes at this point,
since much  of the  data dealing with blood transport, tissue distribution and
subsequent  excretion  is  much better understood in  light  of  these findings.
     A  major factor  in  the determination  of  transformation  processes for
arsenic  in  man  and  other animals was the evolution of appropriate analytical
methods  within  the decade  which permit  chemical  speciation  of chemically
variant  forms of arsenic with reference to both oxidation-state  lability  and
inorganic versus organo-substituted arsenic.
     These  procedures involve different  analytical approaches  and  include
selective  reduction  of various arsenic forms to  the hydride, and subsequent
analysis by colorimetry  (Lakso et al., 1979),  emission spectrometry (Braman
and  Foreback, 1973;  Crecelius,  1977),  atomic absorption spectrometry (Edmonds
and  Francesconi, 1977;  Buchet  et al.  1980), and  gas-liquid  chromatography
(Andreae,  1977;  Talmi and Bostick, 1975).   Alternatively, inorganic arsenic
(III) or (V) and methylated  forms  can  be directly measured  by  ion-exchange
chromatographic  techniques  (Tarn  et al.  1978; Henry  and  Thorpe, 1980).


013AS1/A                           4-11                              June 1983

-------
     There are a  number of points germane to consideration of i_n vivo trans-
formations of arsenic:   1) biomethylation of  inorganic arsenic; 2) oxidation-
reduction of  inorganic  arsenic  i_n vivo; 3) the relative chemical stability of
inorganic arsenic to oxidation-reduction as it affects experimental  dosing and
chemical speciation in biological media.
4.2.1   Biomethylation of Inorganic Arsenic in Humans  and Experimental Animals
     An extensive  literature  has recently appeared documenting  the  i_n  vivo
methylation of  inorganic arsenic to  mono-and dimethyl  arsenic (the  latter
being the major methylated metabolite)  in every mammalian system studied to
date, including man.
     While the quantitative features of this  phenomenon may vary among species,
one can generally  state that  1) dimethyl  arsenic is the major transformation
product; 2) methylation represents a route of detoxification of the more toxic
inorganic forms; 3) dimethyl  arsenic  is a terminal metabolite, formed  rela-
tively rapidly and  rapidly excreted;  4) that while the  iji vivo methylating
capacity of  a given system may persist over a  range  of  inorganic  arsenic
exposure,  at some point the body burden of the unmethylated fraction is  enough
to induce toxic effects,  evidenced  by the extensive  literature dealing with
inorganic arsenic toxicity; and 5)  retrospective assessment  of earlier data
dealing with arsenic metabolism, including distribution and excretion, must be
viewed in light of current knowledge about biomethylation in different species.
4.2.1.1  Human Studies—Using a  method  that permits the determination of  tri-
and pentavalent inorganic  arsenic  as  well as mono- and dimethylarsenic  acids
via selective reduction,  volatilization,  and helium-arc emission detection,
Braman and Foreback (1973) analyzed the urinary excretion of arsenic in four
human subjects.   About  66  percent of  the total  urine arsenic concentration
013AS1/A                            4-12                              June 1983

-------
(22.5 ppb) was present as  dimethylarsinic  acid and 17  percent as  pentavalent
inorganic arsenic.  Trivalent  inorganic  arsenic  and methylarsonic acid were  •
present in equal  amount,  approximately eight percent each.
     Crecelius (1977) reported the urinary excretion of form-variable arsenic
when a human  subject  ingested arsenic-rich wine (50 ug  trivalent and 13 ug
pentavalent).   About  80  percent  of the  arsenic  ingested with the wine was
excreted within 61 hours.   Of the total  excreted,  63 percent was  in the form
of dimethyl arsenic acid, 18 percent was  monomethyl  arsenic acid,  and  approxi-
mately 9 percent each was in the two inorganic forms.
     Consumption of well water containing  200 ug of arsenate by a subject in
the same study showed urinary trivalent arsenic at near background levels with
an elevation in pentavalent form as well  as significant excretion of dimethyl-
arsenic.    Of  the  total  amount ingested, about 50  percent  was recovered  in
urine by  3 days.  Arsenic  as  contained in  canned crab  tissue  was  also studied
in this experiment.   It has been established that arsenic is present  in marine
foods in an organic form which is excreted intact.
     The  study of Smith  et al.  (1977),  using  basically  the  same  speciation/
analysis techniques noted in the previous study and  involving urinary profiles
for a group of copper smelter workers, also confirmed transformation  processes
i_n vivo.    In  controls,  as  well as in  three  study  groups that varied as to
intensity  of  airborne  trivalent  arsenic oxide exposure, dimethyl arsenic was
the dominant  species  in  urine, followed by methyl  arsenic, trivalent arsenic
and pentavalent arsenic, in descending order.
     In  another  smelter worker  study,  Buchet et  al.  (1980a) assessed  the
distribution  of  arsenic  and metabolites in urine  samples  in  different  groups
according  to  the  degree  of inorganic  arsenic  exposure.   Total urinary arsenic
013AS1/A                            4-13                              June 1983

-------
in exposure groups ranged from 74 to 934 pg/liter, of which 75 percent repre-
sented methylated forms  (mono-  and  dimethyl), with dimethyl  arsenic predomi-
nating.   Control subjects showed a somewhat higher level of methylated arsenic
in urine, approximately  90  percent,  suggesting some dependency of the extent
of methylation on the level  of exposure.
     A number of recent  studies have described in more  detail the biomethyla-
tion of inorganic arsenic using human volunteers.
     Buchet et  al. (1981a)  followed  the urinary excretion of  inorganic  and
methylated arsenic in 3-5 volunteers ingesting single amounts of arsenic at  a
dose of 500 ug,  in the form of either arsenite, monomethyl or dimethyl arsenic.
After 96  hours,  46 percent  of the dose in subjects given arsenite (trivalent
arsenic) was excreted, 25  percent in the  inorganic  form and 75 percent as
methylated metabolite.   Of  the  latter,  one-third was monomethyl arsenic and
two-thirds was  the dimethylated  form.   Dimethyl  arsenic was  excreted intact,
75 percent of the ingested  amount appearing in urine by 96 hours.  With mono-
methyl arsenic,  excretion   reached 80  percent by 96 hours,  with  around  13
percent  of  the  urine level representing conversion to the  dimethyl  form.
     In a follow-up  report, these workers  (Buchet et al.  1981b) monitored  the
urinary excretion of  various  arsenical  forms  in 4 human subjects undergoing
repeated  ingestion (5 days) of trivalent inorganic arsenic as a meta  arsenite
salt at  4 levelS--125,  250, 500 or  1000 |jg As.   By 14 days, the percent of
methylated forms  of  total   forms ranged from  74-93  percent over the  intake
range.   From this study, it would appear that the methylating capacity of  the
human subject was unaffected  up to the 500-ug As  level,  at which point some
decrease  in methylated arsenic as a percentage of total was observed.
013AS1/A                            4-14                              June 1983

-------
     Yamauchi and  Yamamura (1979) reported their  results  with 3 volunteer
subjects who ingested an arsenic-rich extract (prepared from a particular kind
of seaweed) containing 2.88 ppm total arsenic.   Of the total amount,  86 percent
was pentavalent  inorganic  arsenic,  7 percent was trivalent inorganic arsenic
and 7 percent was dimethyl  arsenic.   These volunteers ingested the preparation
as a single dose at a level of 10 ug/kg body weight, for total amounts of 650,
680, and 760  ug in the three  subjects.   By  48 hours, urine levels of total
arsenic amounted to  36  percent of the  dose.  Of  the  excreted  amount,  dimethyl
and monomethyl  arsenic accounted for  47.4 and 25.3 percent,  respectively.
4.2.1.2  Animal  Studies--To date, biomethylation processes involving inorganic
arsenic and  experimental   animals have been documented  in  dogs  (Lakso and
Peoples, 1975;  Charbonneau et al.  1978a;  Tarn  et al. 1979a),  mice (Vahter,
1981),  rabbits  (Marafante  et al. 1980; Bertolero  et al.  1981),  the  bovine
(Lakso and Peoples, 1975),  and the rat (Odanaka et al. 1978).  While the level
of methylated forms  of  arsenic in most experimental  species  resembles  that  in
man, approximately 80  percent, there is a greater  amount of the  dimethyl- and
a lesser amount of monomethyl arsenic.
     Vahter  (1981) has  shown (1) that the degree  of biomethylation  is dose-
dependent, at least  in  mice,  falling off  in  relative percentage  with increas-
ing level of dosing;  (2) that this dependency probably accounts for the obser-
vation  of  dose-dependent  retention  in mice; and  (3) methylation occurs to  a
greater extent with trivalent arsenic  than with the  pentavalent form,  although
retention, relative to  total dose, is  greater with the trivalent form.
4.2.2   In Vivo Oxidation/Reduction of Inorganic Arsenic In Mammalian  Systems
     Oxidation  of  trivalent inorganic arsenic to  the pentavalent state has
been  claimed in dogs  (Ginsberg, 1965),  rats (Winkler, 1962), mice  (Bencko
et al. 1976), and humans (Mealey et al. 1959).  An important factor in  consider-


013AS1/A                            4-15                               June 1983

-------
ing these studies critically  is  the fact that none of the reports  considered



the presence of methylated  arsenic,  which may well have affected the analy-



tical  techniques employed and the analytical data obtained.  Secondly, except



for the Bencko et al.  (1976) study,  it is not clear that careful  attention was



paid to  the oxidation state  composition  of dosing media or the effect  of



sample handling on oxidation  state  stability.   In the  Mealey  et al.  (1959)



report, the  analytical  method involved  acidification of urine with hydro-



chloric acid and extraction of the presumed  "trivalent"  arsenic  into benzene,



leaving the presumed "pentavalent" form in the aqueous phase.   Since Mushak et



al.  (1977)  have shown that methylarsonic  and dimethylarsinic (cacodylic) acid



behave like the pentavalent inorganic form in this extraction procedure,  it is



probable that the "arsenate" fraction was mainly methylated arsenic.



     In the  study of  Crecelius  (1977), where  chemical  speciation techniques



were employed, it does not appear that ingestion of a sample containing mainly



arsenite  (trivalent  form) is associated  with  excretion of pentavalent  in-



organic arsenic as  the  chief inorganic form.  After  61 hours, 80 percent  of



the ingested amount appeared  in urine,  with  the  two inorganic  forms each



constituting minor fractions, mono- and dimethyl arsenic being the main forms.



     Evidence  for the u\  vivo reduction  of  pentavalent  to  trivalent inorganic



arsenic has  been claimed in several early reports.  Lanz et al. (1950) reported



some reductive  conversion  (10-15 percent) of  arsenate  to  arsenite in rats,



using as a method the precipitation from  urine of arsenate as a mixed salt and



analysis  of  the supernatant for arsenic  (III).   The  accuracy  of this  method



for partitioning  trace  arsenic  levels is questionable.   Furthermore,  at the



time of  this study,  the  presence of methylated arsenic  was not known.  There-



fore,  it  is not possible  to accept  this  author's  conclusions  since unprecipi-



tated arsenic  could also have consisted of methylated forms.









013AS1/A                            4-16                              June  1983

-------
     Ginsberg (1965) reported  that  14 percent of urinary  and  6 percent of
plasma arsenic in dogs  receiving  intravenous infusion of arsenate was in the
form of trivalent arsenic.  In this study, trivalent was presumably separated
from pentavalent arsenic by chelation-extraction using ethyl xanthate.  Based
on current knowledge that  methylated  arsenic was present,  it is difficult to
accept the data without knowledge of  the behavior of mono- and  dimethyl arse-
nic in this analytical  method.
     In the recent report of Tarn et al.  (1979b) using dogs dosed with arsenate,
a small amount of  trivalent inorganic arsenic was  detected  in urine, using
ion-exchange and thin-layer chromatographic techniques.  These authors did not
independently determine the extent of artifactive interconversion  between the
two forms using these techniques.
     In a  recent study by  Vahter  (1981), in  which mice and rats were  adminis-
      74
tered   As-labeled trivalent or pentavalent  arsenic,  the author reported  that
increases in retention with dose were less pronounced for the pentavalent form
than for the  trivalent  form due to the fact that elimination  of  pentavalent
arsenic seemed to  be  less dependent on methylation.  Nevertheless, increases
in  retention  with  pentavalent  arsenic were  observed.  Vahter  discussed the
possibility that the  observed  dose-related  increase in retention after expo-
sure to pentavalent  arsenic may have been partly due to i_n vivo reduction of
the pentavalent to trivalent form.  Noting the work of McBride et al.  (1978),
whose  studies  indicated that  certain microorganisms required  reduction  of
pentavalent  arsenic  to trivalent  before  methylation could proceed,  Vahter
suggested that a  similar  mechanism might have been functioning in both the
mice and  rats.   Evidence  to  support this hypothesis  was  presented in the
author's observation  that trivalent  arsenic  seemed more readily methylated
than pentavalent.
013AS1/A                            4-17                              June 1983

-------
     Two recent studies using human subjects and identical  chemical  speciation



techniques for arsenic appear to offer conflicting data regarding pentavalent



arsenic reduction.



     Crecelius (1977) noted that ingestion of a sample of  well  water tested as



having 200 ug  As  only in the pentavalent form resulted in a urinary level  of



trivalent arsenic which  was virtually the  same  as  background  concentration



before taking  the arsenic  sample.   Urine was collected for  approximately  3



days, during which time about 50 percent of the dose was excreted.



     Yamauchi and Yamamura  (1979)  fed a preparation of seaweed containing  86



percent pentavalent  arsenic and 7 percent  each of  trivalent inorganic and



dimethyl arsenic to  3 human subjects as  one  dose at a total dosing of 650,



680, and 760  ug  total arsenic.   By 48 hours, based  on their method which was



the Braman et  al.  (1977) procedure, 36 percent of the original dose appeared



in urine, with 75  percent present as methylated forms and about 17 percent



present as trivalent arsenic  (6.3  percent of  the total  amount  ingested).   The



authors calculated that  the amount of trivalent inorganic  arsenic was  greater



than could be ascribed to the small amount  ingested originally and they stated



that the fraction represented ij} viyo reduction  of pentavalent arsenic.  Since



the mean  intake  was  approximately 700 ug,  the  7 percent present as trivalent



inorganic arsenic amounted  to 49  ug, of which  36 percent or 18 ug would have



been expected  to  appear  in  urine  in  some form.   Using 75  percent  methylation,



only approximately 4-5 ug would have  been present as the  trivalent  form, when



in  fact  a  mean value  of 43.4 was  found  (range:  36-51  ug).  Since the Braman



et  al.  (1977)  method  is a  reasonably accurate  speciating technique and there



is  little  evidence  that  samples were handled in a way  to promote artifactive



formation of  trivalent arsenic after excretion, the data cannot be readily



questioned on  this basis.









013AS1/A                            4-18                              June 1983

-------
     The  different  results obtained  by Crecelius  (1977)  and  Yamauchi  and
Yamamura (1979) may be related to the relative amounts of arsenic assimilated.
The Japanese  study  used  amounts about  3-fold  greater  than that reported by
Crecelius.  Furthermore,  only  one  subject was used  in  the Crecelius (1977)
investigation.
4.2.3  Chemical Stability of Trivalent and Pentavalent Inorganic Arsenic
       to Oxidation-Reduction
     In  aerated  water,  trivalent  inorganic  arsenic will  undergo extensive
oxidation to  the  pentavalent  form, particularly when  present  at low levels
(Feldman, 1979).
     The pH of aqueous  solutions appears to be the major factor in the rela-
tive stability of  either  valency form.   Buchet et al.  (1980) found that tri-
valent arsenic in solutions at pH of 7.0 or 9.6 were oxidized to the extent of
70-90 percent  within  one  week, compared to  25 percent  conversion at pH 4.8.
     Vahter and Norin (1980) also noted rapid oxidation of As (III) in aqueous
solution at room  temperature,  while storage at 4°C showed little conversion.
     Pentavalent inorganic arsenic, on the other hand, is stable at neutral or
alkaline pH but  undergoes reduction with decreasing pH (Durrant and Durrant,
1966).
     In  studies  directed to j_n  vivo transformations of inorganic  arsenic,
urine levels are commonly used and some data exist regarding valency stability
of arsenic in urine.
     Buchet et al.  (1980) found that trivalent inorganic arsenic in urine at
pH 7.0 or less was relatively stable, with only 10 percent oxidation occurring
by 7 days.  At pH 9.5, 50 percent of oxidation occurred within one day.
013AS1/A                            4-19                              June 1983

-------
4.3  DISTRIBUTION OF ARSENIC IN MAN AND ANIMALS
     Blood is the main  vehicle for transport of arsenicals  from  absorption
sites to the  tissues, with  the hemokinetic character of arsenic being depen-
dent on the animal  species studied.
     It is readily  apparent  from the literature that the rat constitutes an
anomalous model   for  studies  of the fate of inorganic arsenicals i_n vivo and
this includes the clearance  behavior of rat blood-borne arsenic  (Hunter et
al., 1942; Ducoff et al.,  1948; Lanz et al.,  1950;  Ariyoshi  and Ikeda, 1974;
Klaassen, 1974;   Tsutsumi  and  Kato, 1975; Dutkiewicz, 1977).   In the  case of
the  rat, arsenic in blood is  only  slowly  cleared  following  exposure, with
about 80 percent of  the total  blood arsenic content  localized in the  erythro-
cyte.  The half-times of  blood clearance for  inorganic  arsenic in the  rat
(trivalent or pentavalent)  is  of the order of  60  to 90 days (Lanz et al. ,
1950; Ariyoshi and Ikeda,  1974).
     Arsenic   in  the  blood  of other species—man (Ducoff et al., 1948; Mealey
et  al.,  1959; Tarn et al.,  1979b),  mice (Lanz et al.,  1950;  Crema,  1955),
rabbit (Hunter et al. , 1942; Ducoff, 1948; Klaassen, 1974), dog (Lanz et al.,
1950; Hunter  et  al., 1942),  and primates (Hunter et al., 1942;  Klaassen,
1974)—whether given  as  the pentavalent form or as  the trivalent form, is
rapidly cleared.   Normal blood arsenic  values for individuals in the  U.S. and
Europe are in the range of 1-5 |jg  total  arsenic/liter whole blood  (Bergstromn
and  Wester  1969; Damsgaard et  al.  , 1973;  Kagey et al., 1977 and  Valentine
et al.,  1979).   According to  Kagey et  al. (1977),  cigarette  smokers  showed
mean blood arsenic  levels  approximately 50 percent  higher than non-smokers.
It  is  reasonable  to assume that human background blood levels reflect mainly
dietary arsenic, much of  which would likely be  in  various organo-arsenical
forms that are extensively absorbed and rapidly cleared.


013AS1/A                     <       4-20                              June 1983

-------
     Clearance of arsenic in dog and man was found to fit a three-compartment
model by Charbonneau et al. (1978a) and Tarn et al. (1979b) with half-times of
1, 5, and 35 hours,  respectively.   When contrasted with the  work of Tarn et al.
(1978), which reported  the  time-dependent  jn vivo methylation of arsenic and
excretion in  dogs, the  various components presumably relate to  initial excre-
tion of inorganic arsenic, followed by clearance of dimethyl arsenic.
     The tissue partitioning of  arsenic in man has  been  studied using both
autopsy  and  dosing  data.   Kadowaki (1960)  found  (measurements in ppm, wet
weight) that  nails  (0.89),  hair  (0.18), bone  (0.07-0.12),  teeth  (0.08)  and
skin (0.06)  generally  housed  the highest absolute amounts  of  arsenic, while
heart,  kidney,  liver  and  lung contained somewhat  lower levels (0.04-0.05).
Brain tissue  (0.03) had an arsenic level only slightly lower than other soft
tissues.  Liebscher and Smith (1968),  analyzing tissue samples (ppm dry weight)
from non-exposed sources in Scotland,  observed lung to have the highest levels
(0.09),  with liver  and kidney levels  (0.03)  not materially different from
other soft  tissue.  Like  the Kadowaki  study,  hair  (0.46),  nails (0.28) and
skin (0.08)  had  the  highest absolute values;  however,  bone and teeth  (0.05)
did  not contain levels appreciably different from some other tissues (pectoral
muscles, 0.06; ovary,  0.05; and pancreas, 0.05).
     In  addition  to the autopsy  studies by Kadowaki (1960) and Liebscher and
Smith  (1968), Larsen  et al.  (1979)  have recently  reported on  a detailed  study
of the  topographical  distribution of arsenic  in  normal  human brain tissue.
Arsenic is distributed throughout all  brain regions, with white matter showing
higher  levels than gray matter.
     In  looking  at  tissue distribution  of  arsenic  in experimental animals,
exposure of  various species  to either  tri-or pentavalent  arsenic  leads to the
013AS1/A                            4-21                              June 1983

-------
initial accumulation of the element in liver,  kidney,  lung,  spleen,  aorta,  and
skin (Hunter et  al.,  1942;  Ducoff et al., 1948; Lanz et al., 1950; Peoples,
1964; Ariyoshi  and Ikeda, 1974; Cikrt and Bencko,  1974;  Klaassen,  1974;  Tsutsumi
and Kato, 1975; Urakabo et al., 1975; Dutkiewicz,  1977;  Sabbioni  et al. ,  1979;
Marafante et al.,  1980).   With the exception of the rat, a species in which
metabolism of  arsenic  is only  a very limited model  for study of  this  element
(vide supra),  clearance  from soft tissue is rather rapid except for the skin,
where the high sulfhydryl group content may promote tight trivalent arsenical
binding.   As also  seen with human tissue, arsenic  is  apparently lodged in
brain of experimental  animals  exposed to arsenic,  with slow clearance  reported
(Crema, 1955).
     Recently,  Vahter  and  Norin  (1980)  compared the dependency of  dose  and
valency form of inorganic arsenic on tissue compartmentalization  of arsenic in
mice.   Unlike most of the earlier reports,  these workers used chemical  specia-
tion techniques  (ion-exchange  chromatography)  to  verify that their dosing
media contained  purely tri- or pentavalent arsenic.  Using single oral dosing
at  0.4  or  4.0  mg/kg levels and  radioisotopic  tri-  or pentavalent arsenic,
levels of arsenic in kidney, liver, bile, brain, skeleton,  skin and blood were
always greater (2-10  fold)  in  terms of percent total dose for the trivalent
form than for  the  pentavalent  form, and most pronounced at the higher dose.
These workers  ascribe  much  of  this difference  to relative methylating effi-
ciency as a function of exposure level and valence form.
     In  a  similar  study using Golden Hamsters  exposed  to  injected tri- or
pentavalent radioisotopic  arsenic,  with care taken to assure valence purity,
Ckirt et al.  (1980)  found that levels of arsenic in liver, kidneys, gut wall
and  bile  were  always greater, 2-25  fold,  with trivalent arsenic  exposure.
013AS1/A                            4-22                              June 1983

-------
4.4  ARSENIC ACCUMULATION
     The  long-held  view  of arsenic as an element that accumulates in the body
was mainly  based  on the  behavior of arsenic  in the rat, an animal model which
in retrospect was the  least  helpful in  understanding the fate of the toxicant
In vivo f°r other mammalian species and man.
     Based  on  current arsenic  elimination  data for all  mammalian  species
studied other than  the rat (vide supra), one concludes that marked long-term
accumulation of  arsenic generally does  not  occur  in physiologically vital
components of the body.  This is in contrast to,  say, long-term lead accumula-
tion in bone or cadmium accumulation in renal cortex.  Autopsy tissue data for
human subjects of different  ages is not conclusive  regarding possible  long-
term tissue accumulation.   Kadowaki  (1960)  did observe higher mean levels of
arsenic in  skin  and kidney samples of subjects approximately 50 years of age
versus infant values, but dietary histories of the  subjects were not available
to allow  for differentiation of increases in arsenic  levels  due to current
versus past exposures  for  the older subjects.  Deposition in hair  is really
excretory in nature, not accumulative.
     Brune et al.,  (1980) have  reported  that  lung tissue from retired smelter
workers from the Ronnskar smelter in Sweden,  on autopsy, had median values for
arsenic which were about 8 times higher than that for a control  group.   Kidney
and liver values, however,  were not significantly different between smelter
worker groups  and  controls.  Arsenic  accumulation in  the  lung of  smelter
workers even after  several  years of retirement  and  removal  from workplace
exposure  (interval  of 2-19  years)  suggests  that a very  insoluble  form of
arsenic exists  in smelter ambient air and is  inhaled by these workers.
013AS1/A                            4-23                              June 1983

-------
     Lindh et al.,  (1980)  measured  the arsenic in autopsy femur samples  of 7
occupationally exposed workers.  The time between retirement and death ranged
from 0-21 years.   A control sampling from 5 autopsy cases was  included.   Using
both neutron  activation  analysis and proton-induced X-ray  emission  (PIXIE)
techniques, no clear evidence of significant arsenic accumulation in bone was
seen.   The scatter of levels was wide in the worker group, 0.006-0.21 parts-per-
million, with a  median of  0.014 ppm, versus a range  of 0.005-0.007 in the
control samples.
4.5  ARSENIC  EXCRETION IN MAN AND ANIMALS
     Renal clearance appears  to be  the major  route of excretion of absorbed
arsenic in man and animals, biliary transport of the element leading to enteric
reabsorption  with little  carriage in feces.
     Recent data  for normal or  background levels  of arsenic in  urine of human
subjects  in the  U.S.  reveal  values of  less  than  20 ug/liter  (20 parts per
billion).   If seafood has  been  consumed, such  values can  rise considerably  to
levels  of  1,000  ug/liter Or  higher (Westbo and Rydalv,  1972;  Pinto,  1976).
     In a study designed  to assess the utility of urine arsenic measurement in
occupational  exposure settings, Mappes (1977) reported excretion data for both
single  and multiple daily  dosing for a  human subject ingesting  arsenite solu-
tion.   By  3 hours,  renal excretion  was  maximal, with about  one-quarter of  the
single  dose appearing  in  the urine by  day  1 post-exposure.  With successive
arsenite  ingestion (0.8 mg As), daily urinary clearance after 5 days was about
two-thirds of daily intake.
     Buchet et al. (1981b), in their study of human subjects ingesting arsenite
in amounts ranging  from 125-1000 ug/day for 5  days, calculated  a steady  state
occurring within  5  days.   With steady  state,  60  percent of daily intake is
excreted  daily.   This  figure is in good agreement with that of Mappes (1977)
cited above.

013AS1/A                            4-24                              June 1983

-------
     Crecelius (1977) noted that following ingestion of arsenic in wine [50 [ig
As  (III),  13  M9  As (V)] approximately 80  percent of the dose was excreted
within 61 hours.   Oral ingestion of arsenic (V) in well water (200 ug), however,
led to about 50 percent urinary excretion by 3 days post-ingestion.   Mealey et
al.  (1959)  measured  urine  arsenic in patients given  trivalent  arsenic by
intravenous administration, with  approximately 60 percent of the dose amount
appearing in  the  urine  within 24  hours.   Hunter  et al.  (1942) noted that a
group of  human subjects given  arsenic via  parenteral administration  exhibited
considerable  variance in the urinary clearance of arsenic,  ranging from 30 to
80 percent after 4 to 5 days.
     As might be predicted from the ijn vivo behavior of arsenicals in the rat,
urinary excretion  of  arsenic in this species  is very slow  (due to erythrocyte
retention) on the order of two to five percent of the arsenic intake by several
days post-dosing (Coulson et al., 1935;  Ariyoshi and Ikeda, 1974).  Urakabo et
al. (1975) calculated a half-time of 84 days for arsenic in the rat.
     Slow clearance  of  arsenic  from  the rat  gave  rise  to the widely-held
assumption for many years  that arsenic was one of the elements  that accumu-
lated in  the  body.   Other species excrete arsenic rapidly.   Mice,  rabbits,
swine, dogs,  and monkeys clear the majority  of injected trivalent  arsenic
within 24 hours,  with excretion usually being  >7Q percent within that time
period (Ducoff et  al.,  1948;  Crema, 1955; Munro et al.,  1974; Lakso and Peo-
ples, 1975; Tarn et al., 1978;  Charbonneau  et  al.,  1978a).   Other studies also
indicate rapid urinary  clearance  of arsenic given in the pentavalent form to
species other than the rat (DuPont et al., 1942; Ginsberg and Lotspeich, 1963;
Peoples,  1964; Lakso and Peoples, 1975).
013AS1/A                            4-25                              June 1983

-------
     Several studies have compared the relative rates of elimination of radio-
         74
labeled (  As) trivalent and pentavalent inorganic arsenic (Vahter and Norin,
1980; Vahter, 1981) where  precautions were taken to assure the purity of the
respective  dosing  solutions as to valency  state.   Whole body retention of
trivalent inorganic arsenic in mice was 2-3 times greater than that of arsenate
while retention  times for  both  forms were dose-dependent, increasing with
increasing exposure.  In these studies, the animals received single oral  doses
of either form at  a level  of 0.4  or 4.0 mg  As/kg.  Differences in elimination
rates appeared to  relate  to the  relative  degree of  methylation of  inorganic
arsenic to  the rapidly  excreted methylated forms, chiefly dimethyl arsenic.
     Biliary transport of  arsenic has been reported for a number of species.
Bile-excreted arsenic is  reabsorbed.   Cikrt and Bencko (1974) noted that the
rat  had a higher biliary excretion rate for the  trivalent  than for  the penta-
valent form (approximately 10:1).  Klaassen  (1974)  noted that the biliary
excretion rate was much greater  for the rat than for either the rabbit or the
dog.
     Ckirt  et al., (1980)  monitored biliary exretion  in  the  Golden Hamster
using penta-  or  trivalent  inorganic  arsenic.    Significant  differences  in
biliary excretion  rates  and cumulative excretion were  seen  between the  two
forms, being  much  greater for the trivalent form.   However,  fecal  and urine
arsenic content  was greater with pentavalent arsenic administration.   Biliary
transport data for man are  not available.
     Deposition  of arsenic in  such  organs  as  hair  and  nails  can be  considered
an excretory  mechanism  for arsenic.   Although hair  analysis  has  had a  long
history in  arsenic's  chemical  and forensic literature,  for  reasons of  both
analytical  convenience and  the possibility  of establishing an exposure history
013AS1/A                            4-26                              June 1983

-------
from sectional analysis,  many  questions remain unanswered.  The relationship
between arsenic deposition  in  hair and various exposure  parameters has not
been well defined on a quantitative basis nor are the physiological mechanisms
well understood.   The chemical  nature of hair arsenic is also largely unknown.
013AS1/A                            4-27                              June 1983

-------
                             5.   ARSENIC TOXICOLOGY

     The acute and  chronic  toxicity of arsenic will  largely  depend on the
chemical form and physical  state of the compound  involved.   Inorganic tri-
valent  arsenic  is  generally  regarded  as  being more acutely  toxic than
inorganic pentavalent  arsenic which in turn  is more toxic than methylated
forms of  arsenic  (NAS,  1977; Pershagen and Vahter,  1979;  WHO, 1981).   The
so-called "fish arsenic"  is regarded as nontoxic.   It  is  thus necessary to
always  specify,  if  possible,  arsenic compounds when  discussing  effects and
constructing  dose-effect  and  dose-response  relationships.   In addition,
factors  like particle  size and  solubility  must  be  taken into account.
Trivalent compounds with  low  solubility, e.g.,  arsenic  sulfide, will have  low
oral toxicity but may be retained in the lung (Brune et al., 1980).
5.1  ACUTE TOXICITY OF ARSENIC IN MAN AND ANIMALS
     In animal experiments  the oral  LD5Q has been  found to vary from 15 to 293
mg/kg body weight  in  rats  and from  10-150 mg/kg  in  other  animals  (Dieke  and
Richter,  1946; Harrison et  al.,  1958).   The  lower values  refer to  experiments
with soluble arsenic  compounds.   Franke and Moxon (1936)  found that the LD75
48  hours  after  i.p.  administration, was 4-5  mg As/kg body weight  for  sodium
arsenite and 14-18 mg/kg for  sodium  arsenate.
     Acute effects  seen in  animals after oral  exposure  are similar to  effects
seen in human beings  and  include gastroenteritis, diarrhea and cardiovascular
effects (Nelson et  al., 1971; Selby  et  al., 1977).
     A  large number of acute arsenic poisonings  are  described  in  the  litera-
ture, but few data  exist  on actual doses and type of compound.   Vallee et al.
(1960)  estimated the  lethal dose to  be  on  the order  of  70  to  180 mg for arsenic
 013AS2/A                              5-1                               June  1983

-------
trioxide.   Acute symptoms are due to severe gastrointestinal  damage,  resulting
in vomiting and diarrhea and general vascular injury which may lead to shock,
coma or even  death.   Other acute symptoms are muscular cramps,  facial  edema,
and cardiovascular reactions (Holland,  1904; Done and Peart,  1971).
     Acute symptoms have also  been  seen after airborne exposure to high con-
centrations of arsenic  trioxide,  causing severe irritation of nasal mucosa,
larynx, and bronchi (Holmqvist, 1951; Pinto and McGill, 1953).
     Reversible effects  on  the hematopoietic and cardiovascular systems and
peripheral nervous disturbances with slow recovery have also been noted (Ohta,
1970; Heyman et al., 1956;  Jenkins,  1966; Nagamatsu and Igata,  1975:  O'Shaugh-
nessy and Kraft, 1976; Hamamoto, 1955;  Chhuttani et al., 1967).
     Over the years,  a  number of large-scale poisonings have occurred due to
contamination of  beer  (Kelynack  et al., 1900), soy  sauce  (Mizuta et al.,
1956), dried  infant milk (Tokanehara et  al.,  1956),  and well water (Yoshikawa
et al., 1960).  These episodes mainly caused subacute and chronic symptoms and
will be discussed  in the following sections.
5.2  CHRONIC TOXICITY OF ARSENIC IN  MAN AND ANIMALS
5.2.1  Carcinogenicity/Mutagenicity  of Arsenic
     The  case for the  association  of  inorganic arsenic with skin and lung
cancer  as well as  other visceral  carcinomas has been  extensively  reviewed
(Arsenic.  NAS, 1977; IARC,  1973 and 1980;  NIOSH, 1975; Hernberg, 1977; Sunder-
man,  1976,  Pelfrene,  1976;  Kraybill,  1978; Wildenberg,  1978;  Pershagen and
Vahter, 1979; WHO,  1981).   The literature on  arsenic  carcinogenicity  in humans
is  summarized  in  Table  5-1.
 013AS2/A                             5-2                              June 1983

-------
                      TABLE 5-1.  SUMMARY OF CASE REPORTS AND EPIOEMIOLOGIC STUDIES OF CANCER OR PRECANCEROUS
o
1 — »
53 Study
Media Population

Air Smelter
Workers-
Tacoma ,
Washington
(Analysis of
deaths for
1946-60)
LESIONS IN PERSONS EXPOSED TO ARSENIC
Author(s)
Pinto and
Bennett
(1963)
Type of
Study
Proportionate
Mortality
Results

No difference
in lung cancer
proportionate
mortal ity
between exposed
and unexposed
workers.
Highlights and Deficiencies

Workers leaving the plant
before retirement were not
included. In the classification
of workers by exposure, the
"non-exposed" group apparently
were exposed since they also
had high levels of arsenic in
the urine.
en
 i
CO
Smelter
Workers-
Tacoma,
Washington
(follow-up from
1950-71)

Smelter
Workers-
Tacoma,
Washington
(follow-up
from 1949-73)
                                         Mil ham and        Cohort       40 observed
                                         Strong                         lung cancer
                                         (1974)                         deaths versus
                                                                        18 expected
                                                                        (P <0.001)
Pinto et al.       Cohort      32  observed
(1977)                        respiratory
                              cancer deaths,
                              versus 10.5
                              expected,
                              (P  <0.05);  Dose
                              response seen by
                              urinary arsenic
                              levels and  by
                              duration and
                              intensity of
                              exposure.
                                                     Urinary  arsenic  levels  of
                                                     persons  living around  the
                                                     smelter  decreased  with
                                                     distance from the  smelter.
Study consisted of only
pensioners.
c
3
fD
i-D
co
00

-------
                                                                    TABLE  5-1.   (continued)
GO
3=-
GO
Media

Study
Population

Author(s)

Type of
Study Results

High! ights

and Deficiencies

01
                   Air      Smelter
                           workers-
                           Tacoma,
                           Washington
                           (Follow-up
                           from  1941-1976)
                           Smelter  Workers-
                           Anaconda,  Montana
                           (Followup  from
                           1938  to  1963)
Smelter
Workers-
Anaconda, Montana
(Followup from
1964 to 1977)
Enterline and       Cohort      104  respiratory
   Marsh                       cancer deaths
   (1982)                      observed  versus
                               52.5 expected
                               (P   <0.01).  Dose
                               response  found  by
                               intensity and
                               duration  of  exposure.

   Lee and          Cohort      147  respiratory
   Fraumeni                     cancer deaths
   (1969)                      observed  versus
                               4.47 expected
                               (P <0.01).   Dose
                               response  found  by
                               intensity and
                               duration  of  exposure.

 Lubin (1981)      Cohort       146  respiratory
                               cancer deaths versus
                               88.7 expected
                               (P <0.01).
                                                                                Short-term high intensity
                                                                                arsenic exposures appeared to
                                                                                have a greater effect than did
                                                                                long-term low intensity
                                                                                exposures; SO^ exposure was
                                                                                found to have little or no
                                                                                effect.
                                                                                A dose-response was found
                                                                                between exposure to sulfur
                                                                                dioxide and respiratory cancer
                                                                                mortality.   Exposure to sulfur
                                                                                dioxide could not be separated
                                                                                from exposure to arsenic,
                                                                                however.
Exposure to sulfur dioxide was
not found to have an independent
effect on cancer risk.
c:
3
CD
CO
CO

-------
                                                              TABLE 5-1.   (continued)
 o
 I—>
 CO
en
 i
en
Study
Media Population

Air Smelter
Workers-
Anaconda,
Montana
(Followup
from 1938
to 1977)

Sample of 1800
of the Smelter
Workers-
Anaconda, Montana
(Followup from
1938-1977)


Lung cancer
from the
parish
where the
Ronnskar
smelter is
located
Lung cancer
deaths in the
city of
Saganoseki-
Machi , Japan.
Author(s)

Lee-Feldstein
(1982)






Welch et al.
(1982)






Axel son
et al.
(1978)




Kuratsune
et al.
(1974)


Type of
Study Results

Cohort 302 respiratory
cancer deaths
observed versus
105.8 expected
(P <0.01). Dose
response found by
duration and
exposure.
Cohort 24 respiratory cancer
deaths versus 4.6 expected
(P <0.01) in the heavy
exposure category. Dose-
response found by intensity
(both time-weighted average
and ceiling level
categories) of exposure.
Case- For smelter workers, the
control lung cancer mortality
odds ratio was 4.6; there
also was a significantly
(P <0.02) elevated risk
of leukemia and myeloma
among smelter workers.
Case- 58% of lung cancer cases
control were found to be former
smelter workers versus
15.8% in the controls.

Highlights and Deficiencies









Analysis of lung cancer
mortality by S02 exposure
found that S02 did not
play an important role in
the respiratory cancer
process.


Exposure to sulfur dioxide
did not appear to be
associated with lung
cancer.



The cause of death listed
on the death certificate
was validated using
detailed pathologic
analysis.
C_i
c

CD
CO
CO

-------
o
I—I
GO

GO
                                                                    TABLE  5-1.   (continued)
Media

Study
Population
Author(s)
Type of
Study Results

Highlights

and Deficiencies

                Air
Copper
smelters in
Saganoseki-
machi, Japan
Tokudome
and Kuratsune
(1976)
Cohort
                              Smelter
                              Workers  in
                              Magna, Utah
                 Rencher et al.
                 (1977)
                  Proportionate
                  mortality  and
                  cohort.
en
 i
cr>
                              Residents
                              living  near
                              a  smelter
                              in El Paso,
                              Texas
                 Rom et al.
                 (1982)
                  Case-
                  control
29 Trachea, lung,
and bronchus cancer
deaths versus 2.44
expected (P <0.01);
3 observed colon cancer
deaths versus 0.59
expected (P <0.05).
A lung cancer dose
response was seen by
length of employment
and level of exposure.

7 percent of the deaths
were lung cancer deaths
compared to 0 to 2.2
percent for other factory
workers and 2.7 percent
for the State; the lung
cancer death rate was
found to be 10.1 per
10,000 versus 2.1 and
3.3 per 10,000 for mine
workers and the State
respectively.

No association was
found between
lung cancer and
distance from the
plant.
The latent period ranged
from 13 to 50 years, with
an average of 37.6 years.
                                              Effects  of migration,
                                              smoking  and occupation were
                                              not considered.
c
3
fD
CO
CO

-------
o
H->
CO

co
                                                       TABLE  5-1.   (continued)
Media

Study
Population
Author(s)
Type of
Study Results

Highlights

and Deficiencies

    Air
Residents of     Newman et al.
Deer Lodge       (1976)
and Silver Bow
Counties,
Montana
                  All counties
                  in the United
                  States with
                  smelters
                  Residents
                  near a
                  smelter
                  in Utah
                 Blot and
                 Fraumeni
                 (1975)
                 Lyon et al.
                   (1977)
                  Residents near   Pershagen
                  Ronnskarverken   etal.
                  smelter in        (1977)
                  northern Sweden
Ecological      There was an increase
Correlation     found in the incidence
                of lung cancer among
                men.   In one of the
                cities there was also
                an increase in lung
                cancer among women.

Ecological      Average lung cancer
Correlation     mortality rates were
                significantly elevated
                for both males and
                females in 36 counties
                with smelters processing
                copper, lead, or zinc ores.

Case-           No association
 Control         between cancer
                and distance from
                the smelter was
                found.
                                  Ecological      A  significantly  higher
                                  Correlation     mortality  rate for
                                                 lung  cancer was  noted
                                                 for men  in the exposed
                                                 area.  The increase  was
                                                 no longer  significant
                                                 when  occupational cases
                                                 were  excluded, however.
                                                                                                  No adjustment was made  for
                                                                                                  cancer cases which may  be
                                                                                                  occupational.
Lymphoma cases which may
have an association with
arsenic exposure were used as
controls.   Effects of smoking,
migration, and occupation were
not considered.

When excluding occupational
cases of lung cancer from
the study population, lung
cancer cases for a
comparable occupational
group were not excluded
from the comparison
population.
CO
CO

-------
                                                          TABLE  5-1.   (continued)
o
I—»
CO

CO
Media

Study
Population
Author(s)
Type of
Study
Results

Highlights

and

Deficiencies

       Air
Population       Matanoski
surrounding an   et al.
arsenical        (1976, 1981)
pesticide
facility
Ecological
Correlation
                     Arsenical
                     sheep dip
                     manufacturing
                     workers
                 Hill and
                 Fanning
                 (1948)
Proportionate
mortality
en
oo
The lung cancer
mortality for males in
the census tract in
which the plant was
located was 3-4 times
higher than the control
tracts (P <0.05).

 29.3 percent of
 deaths were due
 to lung cancer
 versus 12.9 percent
 of deaths among
 workers in the same
 geographic area who
 were not exposed to
 arsenic (P <0.05).
 The excess in cancer
 deaths was mainly
 due to an excess in
 lung cancer and skin
 cancer.
The difference in the lung
cancer mortality rate in
the index tract could not
be explained by occupation.
c
3
rr>
CO
oo

-------
  o
  I—>
  CO
 oo
                                                                   TABLE 5-1.  (continued)
                Air
 CJI
 i
Media
Study
Population
Author(
1)
Type
Stud
of
y
Results
Highl
ights
and
Deficiencies
Arsenical
pesticide
manufacturing
workers
Ott et al.
 (1974)
                                                                Proportionate
                                                                Mortality and
                                                                Cohort
                              Retirees of
                              an arsenical
                              pesticide
                              plant in
                              Baltimore,
                              Maryland
                              (follow-up
                               from 1960-
                               1972
                 Baetjer
                 et al. (1975)
                  Proportionate
                  mortality
                  and Cohort
16.2% and 3.5% of
deaths in the exposed
group were from cancer
of the respiratory
system and from
lymphatic and hemato-
poietic cancers,
except leukemia,
respectively versus
5.7 and 1.4% in the
controls; the cohort
mortality study found
20 respiratory cancer
deaths and 5 deaths
of the lymphatic and
hematopoietic tissues
versus 5.8 and 1.3
expected respectively
(Both significant at
 P <0.01).

The proportionate
mortality ratio (PMR)
was 6.58 for
respiratory cancer
(P <0.05);  for cause- '
specific mortality the
observed-to-expected
ratios were 16.67 for
respiratory cancer and
50 for lymphatic cancer
(Both with P <0.05).
A respiratory cancer
mortality dose response was
not found below an average
dosage of 3890 mg of
arsenic, but above that
dosage there was a good
dose response.  It should
be noted, however, that
all of the respiratory
cancer at or below 3890 mg
had less than one year of
exposure.  Thus, it is
unlikely that those deaths
were due to arsenic
exposure.
The cohort study was
limited to pensioners only.
 _
3
CO
CO

-------
CD
l—>
GO
GO
—I

Study
Media Population
Air Retirees of
an arsenical
pesticide
plant in
Baltimore,
Maryland
(follow-up
1946-1977)
Wenatchee
Valley orchard
workers in the
state of
Washington

German
vintners

Author(s)
Mabuchi et al .
(1979)






Nelson et al.
(1973)




Roth (1958)

TABLE 5-1.
Type of
Study
Cohort







Cohort





Proportional
mortality
(continued)
Results Highlights and Deficiencies
12 observed lung cancer
deaths versus 3.6
expected, (P <0.05);
A dose response by
duration of employment
was seen for those with
exposure of high intensity.

No difference was found
between the cohort and
the state of Washington
for overall cancer
mortality or for lung
cancer mortality.
Of 47 autopsies among
vintners with chronic
 I

O
       Water
Residents of
a section of
Taiwan with
high levels
of arsenic in
the drinking
water
Tseng et al.
(1968);
Tseng (1977)
                     Sample of        Borgono and
                     inhabitants       Grieber
                     of  Antofagasta,   (1972)
                     Chile
                arsenic intoxication,
                64% of the deaths were
                due to cancer, 60% to
                lung cancer; 6 of the 47 and
                13 of the 47 were reported
                to have liver and skin
                tumors, respectively.

Cross-          A skin cancer
 sectional       prevalence rate
                of 10.6/1000 for
                those drinking
                wel1 water was
                found compared
                to 0/1000 for
                a control area.
                The skin cancer
                rate followed a
                dose-response by
                arsenic concentration
                in the water.

Cross-          Abnormal skin
 Sectional       pigmentation and
                hyperkeratosis were
                found in Antofagasta
                where high arsenic
                levels in the water
                were reported.   No
                skin cancers were
                reported,  however.
00
GO

-------
 o
 1—»
 GO
                                                                TABLE 5-1.  (continued)
en
 I
Study
Media Population Author(s)
Type of
Study Results
Highlights and Deficiencies

Water Residents of Bergoglio
certain (1964)
departments
in the province
of Cordoba,
Argentina
exposed to
high levels
of arsenic in
the water




Patients at Arguello
a dermatology et al.
clinic in
eastern
Argentina



Proportionate The proportion
mortality of cancer
deaths was
higher than
for the province
as a whole
(23.84% versus
15.3% P <0.05).
Of the cancer
deaths, respir-
atory cancer
was reported to
be 35% and skin
cancer 2.3%.
Case The largest
Reports proportion of cases
in the clinic (82%)
came from areas with
the highest incidence
of chronic endemic
regional arsenical
intoxication.
The data is apparently not
age-adjusted. No compar-
ison is made of the per-
centage of respiratory and
skin cancer deaths in the
affected departments with
the respective proportion
for Cordoba Province.






The study was not
population-based.
Therefore, it cannot be
said that the incidence
of skin cancer is
significantly increased
in these areas.

                           Residents in an  Morton et al.      Cross-
                           area of Lane     (1976)             sectional
                           County, Oregon
The prevalence of
skin cancer was not
found to be associated
with arsenic concentra-
tions in the water.
The sample size was
relatively small.
C_.
c
3
CO
oo

-------
                                                                    TABLE  5-1.   (continued)
 CO
 3=
 CO
Media

Water


Study
Population Author(s)

Two persons Astrup
1 iving in an (1968)
area of Taiwan
with endemic
high levels
of arsenic in
the water supply.
Type of
Study

Case reports


Results

Both individuals
had developed
blackfoot disease.


Highlights and Deficiencies




                 Milk
A group of
children in
Japan
Yamashita
et al. (1972)
                                                                Cohort
 en
 i
Arsenical
medicinals
Patients
being treated
with arsenical
medicinals
Hutchinson
(1888)
                Arsenical
                 medicinals
Patients being
treated for
skin diseases
and various
internal
disorders with
arsenical
medicinals
Neubauer
(1947)
                                                                Case
                                                                 Reports
Case
 Reports
Hyperpigmentation and
depigmentation were
found to be prevalent
in about 15 percent of
the survivors
approximately 15 years
after exposure.

Six patients treated
with arsenical
medicinals exhibited
the keratotic lesions
associated with
arsenical poisoning.

143 individuals with
epitheliomas and who had
taken arsenical
medicinals.
                                                                                                               There was  no  comparison
                                                                                                               group.
3
fD
i-D
CO
CO

-------
 o
 I—"
 CO

 CO
              Media
  Study
Population
                                                                 TABLE  5-1.   (continued)
                                             Author(s)
                 Type of
                  Study
                Results
                               Highlights and Deficiencies
en
 i
              Arsenical
               medicinal
              Arsenical
               medicinal
              Arsenical
               medicinal
              (Fowler's
                Solution)

              Arsenical
               medicinals
              (Fowler1s
                Solution)
Patients
treated with
Fowler's
solution (an
arsenical
medicinal) by
a private
practitioner
Patients
treated with
arsenical
medicinals
Male patient
27 cases
exposed to
arsenic either
via arsenical
drugs or via
occupation
Fierz
(1965)
Cohort
Reymann
et al.
(1978)
Cohort
Regelson
et al.  (1968)
Sommers and
McManus
(1953)
Case
Report
Case
Reports
106 of the 262 patients
reporting for physical
examination reported
hyperkeratosis; 21
cases of skin cancer
were also found.  The
response increased with
increasing dose.
Of 389 persons treated
with arsenical
medicinals, 41 internal
malignant neoplasms
were found to occur
versus 44.6 expected.
No increase in internal
malignant neoplasms
was found by dose.

Hemangi oendothe1i a 1
sarcoma of the liver.
Skin carcinoma were
reported in all cases;
visceral cancers were
reported for some of
the cases.
Less than 45% of the cohort
presented themselves for
physical examination, and
the author himself reported
that the patients reporting
for examination were not a
representative sample.
Furthermore, no controls
were used.

There was no control group.
Internal organs presumably
includes the lung, and
there was no control for
smoking, a major confounder
with regard to lung cancer.
CO
GO

-------
                                                                    TABLE 5-1.  (continued)
CO
3=
Media

Arsenical
Medicinal
Study
Population

Male patient
Author(s)

Nurse (1978)
Type of
Study

Case
Report
Results

Adenocarcinoma
of the kidney
Highlights and Deficiencies

Patient treated with a variety
of other drugs before developing
kidney cancer.
                 Arsenical     2 male patients  Knoth (1966)
                  Medicinal    1 female patient
 I
H-"
-P»
                 Arsenical
                  medicinals
                  occupational
                  exposure
                  and air
                  (occupa-
                  tional)
                  exposure
16 vintners
who were
arsenical
pesticide
users; patient
who took arsenical
medicinals
                                                Braun (1958)
Case            Female developed
Reports         mammary carcinoma
                and skin cancer;
                1 male patient
                developed a
                reticulosarcoma of
                the glans penis;
                1 male developed
                skin cancer.

 Case reports   Skin and visceral
                cancers were reported
                among the vintners; skin,
                lung cancers were reported
                for one patient taking an
                arsenical medicinal
                skin cancer was reported
                for the other patient
                who took an arsenical
                medicinal.
oo
OJ

-------
o
I—«
CO
                                                                  TABLE  5-1.   (continued)
 en
 i
               Media

               Arsenical
                medicinals
               (Fowler's
                Solution)
  Study
Population

2 male
patients
Author(s)

Morris
et al.
(1974)
Type of
 Study

Case
Reports
Results

One patient developed
skin pigmentation, skin
tumors, carcinoma of the
larynx, and a probable
bronchial carcinoma; the
other developed skin
pigmentation and keratosis.
Both developed noncirrhotic
portal hypertension.
Highlights and Deficiencies
Arsenical
medicinal
(Fowler's
Solution)
Arsenical
medicinal s
(Fowler's
Solution)
Arsenical
medicinal
(Fowler1 s
Solution)
Female
patient
4 male patients
and 1 female
patient
1 male patient
Prystowsky
(1978)
Popper et al.
(1978)
Lander et al .
Case
Report
Case
Reports
Case
Report
Woman developed
nasopharyngeal cancer
developed palmar and
keratosis.
; also
plantar
The cases developed
angiosarcoma of the liver.
The patient developed
angiosarcoma.

 c:
 3
 CD
 oo
 u>

-------
     This subsection will first  focus  on clinical  pathophysiological  aspects
of arsenic carcinogenesis,  followed  by pertinent epidemiological studies of
arsenic-induced carcinogenesis.   Experimental  studies  of  arsenic-induced
carcinogenesis will also be presented  as will data dealing with  arsenic muta-
genesis.
5.2.1.1   Clinical  Aspects  of  Human  Arsenic Carcinogenesis--In man,  chronic
exposure  to  arsenic induces  a  characteristic sequence of changes  in skin
epithelium, proceeding from hyperpigmentation to hyperkeratosis which may be
histologically described  as  showing  keratin proliferation of  a verrucose
nature with derangement of the squamous portions of the epithelium or may even
be described in some cases as  squamous cell carcinomas.
     Late onset skin  cancers, associated with arsenic exposure, appear to be
of two  histopathological  types:   squamous carcinomas in  the  keratotic  areas
and basal  cell  carcinomas.   In one study dealing with skin cancer after pro-
longed  use  of Fowler's  solution (Neubauer,  1947), the  ratio of types was
approximately 1:1.
     Arsenic-associated  skin  cancers  differ  from those  of  ultraviolet  light
etiology  by  occurring on areas generally  not exposed to  sunlight, e.g. palms
and  soles,  and occurring as  multiple  lesions (Arsenic.   NAS, 1977; Pershagen
and  Vahter,  1979;  WHO, 1981;  Tseng, 1977;  Sunderman, 1976).  This appears  to
be  the case  for  medicinal (Neubauer,  1947), environmental  (Tseng et  al. ,
1968),  and occupational (Roth,  1958;  Braun, 1958) exposure.  The  time lag
between  initiation  of  exposure and  occurrence of skin cancer  has been reported
to  range from 13 to  50  years for arsenical medicinally induced skin cancer.
The  minimal  latency period for skin cancer in the  most reliable epidemiologic
study  of arsenic-contaminated drinking water was  reported to  be  24 years.
 013AS2/A                             5-16                             June 1983

-------
     The  amount  of data on  the  histological  classification of lung  tumors
associated  with  occupational arsenic  exposure is  limited.   Newman et al.
(1976)  report  that arsenic-associated  lung  cancers are usually the  poorly
differentiated type of epidermoid bronchogenic carcinoma.  These investigators
studied worker groups with diagnosed lung cancer in copper-mining and smelting
communities  in  Montana.   Of  25  smelter workers,  4 had  well-differentiated
epidermoid  carcinoma,  10 poorly  differentiated epidermoid  carcinoma,  7  small-
cell undifferentiated  epidermoid carcinoma  and 3 acinar-type adenocarcinoma.
Copper miners and  "non-copper"  control individuals had  lung  cancer profiles
which were  similar to each other.
     The  time  period between initiation  of  exposure  and the occurrence  of
arsenic-associated lung cancer was  found in a couple of studies to be on the
order of  35-45 years  (Lee  and Fraumeni,  1969; Tokudome  and Kuratsune,1976).
Recently, a latency  period  of <20 years  was  reported by Enter!ine  and  Marsh
(1980; 1982) based  upon  their studies  of copper  smelter workers  in Tacoma,
Washington.   Tokudome  and  Kuratsune  (1976)  found that  the  latent period  for
lung cancer ranged from 13 to 50 years.
     The  association of other visceral  cancers with arsenic exposure  has  been
noted in  a  number of  reports and has  been  reviewed  elsewhere  (WHO,  1981;
Arsenic. NAS, 1977; NIOSH,  1976;  IARC, 1973).  For example, hemangiosarcoma of
the liver,  a rare  form of cancer, has  been  diagnosed in workers exposed to
arsenic  and in  non-occupationally arsenic-exposed  individuals  (Roth, 1958;
Regelson et al.,  1968;  Lander et al., 1975).   Morris et al. (1974) have postu-
lated that  the  peculiar hepatic fibrosis associated  with arsenic-induced
portal  hypertension is  a precursor state for subsequent progression to hepatic
angiosarcoma.   Popper  et al.  (1978)  have noted that the hepatic fibrosis and
hypertension seen in humans  with  Thorotrast,  vinyl chloride or arsenic exposure


013AS2/A                             5-17                             June 1983

-------
are also  induced  by agents  which presumably also have  a  role  in hepatic
angiosarcoma.
     Other cancers noted  in  arsenic-exposed  subjects include:   lymphomas  and
leukemia (NIOSH,  1976;  Ott et al., 1974);  renal  adenocarcinoma  (Sommers  and  Mc-
Manus, 1953;  Nurse,  1978); and nasopharyngeal  carcinoma (Prystowsky et al.,  1978).
     Pelfrene (1976)  has criticized the reports  of internal  malignant neoplasms
associated with arsenic exposure on the basis of the relative rarity of their
detection in large-scale  studies  of chronic  arsenic  exposure such as that of
Tseng (1968, 1977).   More recently, Reymann et al. (1978) reported on a study
of a group of patients  who took arsenic medicinally in the 1930s.   An increase
in internal cancers was  observed  only in a subpopulation of female patients
treated for multiple basal cell carcinomas and patients with arsenic keratoses,
when  compared  with  the expected  incidence of malignant internal  neoplasms
based on the Danish  Cancer Registry.
5.2.1.2 Epidemiological Aspects of Human Arsenic Carcinogenesis
5.2.1.2.1  Cancer of the  lung.  A large number of reports  are  available  on
possible associations  between  occupational exposure  to arsenic and cancer of
the respiratory system.   As  is common in studies of this type, exposure data
are very  uncertain  and the arsenic exposure  is  not  always clearly  defined
regarding the physicochemical properties of the arsenic compounds.  The picture
is often  confused by simultaneous  exposure to other  agents,  especially  sulfur
dioxide and metals.   Data on smoking are often lacking or incomplete.
     An excess mortality  in respiratory cancer has especially been noted among
workers engaged  in  the production and usage  of pesticides, and among smelter
workers.
      In 1948, Hill and Faning presented data  on proportional mortality  rates  among
British workers exposed to a mixture of ingredients—including sodium arsenite,
powdered  sulfur  and  soda ash—used in the manufacture of a sheep-dip powder.

013AS2/A                             5-18                             June 1983

-------
Between 1910 and  1943,  75 deaths had occurred  among  workers  in the sodium
arsenite factory  and 1,216 deaths had occurred  among workers in the same area
but without  known exposure  to  arsenic.   Proportionate  mortality  analysis
showed that of  the  deaths among factory workers, 29.3 percent had died from
cancer, whereas the corresponding  figure for the other workers was 12.9 per-
cent.   The excess in cancer deaths among the factory workers was mainly due to
an excess in lung cancer, 31.8 percent of all cancer deaths compared with 15.9
percent; and in skin cancer,  13.6 percent compared with 1.3 percent.
     Among the  factory  workers,  chemical workers, who were the workers most
closely associated with arsenite production, had a higher proportion of cancer
deaths than did the factory  workers as a group.   Furthermore, all  lung cancer
deaths had occurred among the chemical workers.
     Arsenic in the air  of  the sodium  arsenite  factory  was  determined in
                                                               3
1945-46 (Perry et al.,  1948)  and concentrations up to 4 mg As/m  were found by
sampling for 10 minutes.   No data were given on the age of the deceased, and
smoking habits were not recorded.  The data do not allow any conclusions about
exposure before 1943.   Nevertheless,  this study indicated  that there might be
an increased risk for respiratory cancer in the manufacture of arsenic-containing
pesticides,  and  studies  in  two United  States  plants have given  further
support.
     Ott et al.  (1974)  studied the mortality of workers  in one of these two
chemical plants.  From  1919  to  1956 one  unit  formulated and packaged insecti-
cides  containing  arsenic in  the form of lead  arsenate,  calcium arsenate,
copper acetoarsenite, and magnesium  arsenate.   During this period, the pro-
portions of the different compounds varied.   The main product was lead arsenate.
The size of the workforce was about 30 in 1928  and 100 in  1948.  Turnover was
high with  less  than  25  percent of the men  remaining with the unit for more
013AS2/A                             5-19                             June 1983

-------
than one year.   Arsenic concentrations in air in 1943 were between 0.18 and 19
       3                                                                    3
mg As/m  in the packaging area; in 1952 concentrations were 1.7-40.8 mg As/m
and 0.26-7.5 mg/m   in  the  drum dryer area and packaging area, respectively.
By combining job classifications and air arsenic data, four exposure classifi-
cations were obtained with estimated  arsenic exposures (8-hr TWA) of 5, 3, 1,
            3
and 0.1 mg/m .  The total  dosage was then calculated for each individual by
                                                                            3
multiplying air levels with the number of days at work and assuming that 4 m
were inhaled during a working day.
     Mortality was  studied by  analysis  of proportionate mortality  and by a
retrospective cohort analysis.   Nearly 2,000 employees in the factory had died
between 1940 and  1972.   One  hundred  seventy-three were  identified  as  having
worked one  or  more days in the arsenical production unit and who then either
worked for the company until  death or died after retirement.
     Ott et al. (1974)  after adjusting  for age and year  of death  compared  the
differences in proportionate mortality between the study group and the controls.
Among the exposed,  respiratory cancer accounted for 16.2 percent of the deaths
compared with 5.7 percent in the controls (p < 0.001).  There was also a signifi-
cant  increase  (p  < 0.05) in deaths from lymphatic and hematopoietic cancers,
except for  leukemia.   Table  5-2 shows the  observed  to expected ratios  for re-
spiratory cancer in relation to exposure.  (In the original table, dosage esti-
                       3
mates were  based on 4 m  inhaled per  8 hr and expressed  as the natural logarithms.
                                                                     3
In  the  present table,  dosage  is expressed  in mg  and is  based on  10  m  inhaled
air.)  There is no  tendency towards a dose-response  relationship  at total expo-
sures  from  105 to  3890 mg, but a sharp increase is noted at higher dosages.
Furthermore, Blejer and Wagner  (1976) reported that  of the 173 deaths, 138  had
occurred among workers with less than one year of exposure.   In that group, 16
deaths were due to respiratory  cancer.   As seen  in Table 5-2, 15  of those  deaths
 013AS2/A                              5-20                              June  1983

-------
   TABLE 5-2.   OBSERVED AND EXPECTED DEATHS DUE TO RESPIRATORY MALIGNANCIES,
                               BY EXPOSURE CATEGORY
TWA Concentra-
tion x months
of exposure
<1
1-1.9
2-3.9
4-5.9
6-11.9
12-23.9
24-59.9
60-95.9
96+
Average
dosage
mg
105
316
630
1050
1991
3890
8833
16257
74332
No. of
total
deathst
26
17
24
22
27
18
13
13
13
Respiratory Malignancy Deaths
Ob-
served*
1 (1)
2 (2)
4 (4)
3 (3)
3 (3)
2 (2)
3 (1)
5 (0)
5 (0)
Expected
1.77
1.01
1.38
1.36
1.70
.97
.77
.79
.72
Ratio Observed
Katl° Expected
.6
2.0
2.9
2.2
1.8
2.1
3.9
6.3
7.0
tn = 173, 138 workers had less than one year of exposure.
*Number in brackets shows respiratory cancer deaths in workers
 exposed less than one year.
Source:  Modified from Ott et al.  (1974),  and Blejer and Wagner (1976).
      013AS2/A
5-21
June 1983

-------
occurred in  the  six groups with average total exposures estimated to be from
105 to  3890  mg.  There  are  no quantitative  data on  other compounds that these
workers might  have  been exposed to during their total time with the company;
however, it  is known that  in addition  to the  arsenic-containing  insecticides,
the plant processed and packaged several other products, the most important of
which were powdered sulfur and dry lime sulfur.
     The retrospective  cohort analysis was  based on  a  roster of 603 workers
who had worked for  at  least one month in  the actual unit  between 1940 and
1973.   Workers leaving  the  company before retirement as well as workers who
had been exposed to asbestos were not  included in the analysis.   It was stated
that virtually all  men  with at least one year of exposure had been identified.
Person-years, by 10-year age groups, for five calendar year groups were calcu-
lated and expected  number  of deaths were calculated  by using  United States
white male mortality data.   Table 5-3 shows that by this analysis a significant
increase (p  < 0.01) in deaths  due to respiratory  cancer  was  found among
exposed workers.   There  was also a significant increase (p <  0.01) in the
number of deaths due to malignant neoplasms  in  lymphatic  and  hematopoietic
tissues, except leukemia.
     A chemical plant in Baltimore  has been subjected to two studies concern-
ing the working  environment and one study  concerning the outer environment.
This plant started  producing arsenic acid in  the early  1900s and in the early
1950s production of arsenical  pesticides  started.   Lead arsenate, calcium
arsenate and  sodium arsenate  were among the  compounds  produced.  Production
terminated in  1974  (Matanoski et al.,  1976).   The plant also produced  chlori-
nated hydrocarbons  and  organic phosphates.   Data  on air concentrations of
arsenic are lacking.
013AS2/A                             5-22                             June 1983

-------
      TABLE 5-3.   OBSERVED AND EXPECTED DEATHS FOR SELECTED CAUSES IN
                    RETROSPECTIVE COHORT ANALYSIS (1940-1973)
                                  Observed
                                    deaths
                Expected
                 deaths
              (U.S. white
                 male)
             Ratio of
             observed
            to expected
              deaths
All causes                           95

Malignant neoplasms, total           35
  Respiratory system                 20
  Digestive organs & peritoneum       7
  Lymphatic & hematopoietic
   tissues except leukemia            5
  All other sites                     3

Diseases of cardiovascular system    41
Emphysema, chronic bronchitis,
  & asthma

All external causes

All other causes
 4

 9

 6
                 113.5

                  19.4
                   5.8
                   6.3

                   1.3
                   6.0

                  58.5
 2.8

12.7

20.1
               .84

              1.80
              3.45t
              1.11

              3.85t
               .50

               .70
1.43

 .71

 .30
t  p < 0.01

Source:  Ott et al.  (1974).
013AS2/A
5-23
               June 1983

-------
     In the  first  study,  Baetjer et al.  (1975)  reported  on  both  the  propor-
tionate mortality  and age-specific death  rates  of workers who had retired
between 1960 and 1972 and generally had at least 15 years' employment.  Seven-
teen of 22 deaths among male white workers and two of five among female workers
were due  to malignant neoplasms.   The female deaths did  not  appear  to be
related to  occupational  exposure,  whereas, the male  deaths  did.   Of  the 17
malignant neoplasms in males, 10 were in the respiratory tract, 3 were lympho-
sarcomas,  and the  remaining 4 were of other tissues.  The proportionate mor-
tality analysis, based on mortality data  for  the city of  Baltimore, showed an
observed/expected ratio of  6.58  for respiratory  cancer  (p  <.05) and 15.79 for
cancer of the lymphatic  and hematopoietic system (0.1 < p < 0.05).  The age-
specific death  rate  analysis showed that deaths from respiratory cancer were
16.67 times  the expected and that  for lymphosarcomas,  the observed  number
was 50 times that of  the expected number.  The authors  reported that  observed
and expected rates  for  non-cancer deaths did not  differ  significantly (p <
0.05).
     In a second study (Mabuchi  et al., 1979), a follow-up was made of workers
employed from 1946 to 1974.   Since exposure data were lacking, an  attempt was
made to classify workers according to exposure to arsenicals and non-arsenicals.
A roster of 3,141 workers was obtained.  Since 2,189 workers had been employed
for less than 4 months,  a 20 percent random sample was drawn from that popula-
tion and together with the remaining 952 workers constituted the study popula-
tion:   1,050 males  and  343  females, mainly white.   Exposure assessments were
made,  and the workers were categorized into one of six exposure groups.
     Of the  study  population,  240 had died:  197  males and  43 females.  Ex-
pected deaths were calculated from the  city  of Baltimore statistics.  The
observed/expected ratios for lung  cancer were analyzed by exposure,  year of

013AS2/A                             5-24                             June 1983

-------
first employment,  and  duration of employment.  A  statistically  significant
increase in lung cancer mortality (SMR = 336, p < 0.05) was found among "pre-
dominantly arsenical production" workers.  There was a clear lung cancer mor-
tality dose-response among these workers  by duration of  exposure.   Those
employed 15-24 years and  25+  years  both had  statistically  significant (p <
0.05) lung cancer  SMRs (1365 and 2750, respectively).  Interestingly,  statis-
tically significantly elevated SMRs  were only found in "predominantly arsenical
production" workers, but  not in workers engaged entirely in arsenical  produc-
tion.  Further analysis revealed  that the proportion of workers engaged en-
tirely in  arsenical  production for  5 years  or more was relatively  low (1
percent), while  the proportion of  workers exposed  predominantly,  but not
entirely, to arsenic for  5 years  or more was much higher (29 percent).  This
difference in  duration of  exposure  may have accounted for  the  absence of
excess lung cancer mortality  among  the purely high  arsenic exposed workers.
Data on smoking were not obtained.
     Occupational  exposure  to  arsenical  pesticides  has been  common among
vintners and agricultural  workers.   Exposure has  mainly been to lead arsenate.
In a  study of  orchard workers, Nelson et al.  (1973)  did not find an excess  of
lung cancer compared with the  state of Washington.  This study was evaluated
by NIOSH  (1975), and it was concluded that the study by Nelson et al.  did  not
accurately depict  the  cancer  mortality of persons exposed to  lead arsenate.
     Several  studies  in  Germany  indicate  that workers exposed  to arsenic
trioxide when  spraying vineyards  had a high  mortality in cancer, especially
lung cancer.    In one  report (Roth,  1958), it was stated that of 47 autopsies
among vintners with chronic arsenic  intoxication,  30 (64 percent) were due  to
cancer, and 18 to  lung cancer (60 percent of all  cancer deaths).   The author
did not state how the cases were selected, nor were controls used in the study.


013AS2/A                             5-25                             June 1983

-------
     Occupational exposure to  arsenic  also occurs in smelters where exposure
is  predominantly  to arsenic  trioxide.   Several studies  have  been  done on
mortality among workers  at  the copper smelter  in Tacoma, Washington.   Pinto
and Bennet  (1963) reported on  the proportionate mortality of 229 workers from
1946 to  1960.  Workers leaving the plant before retirement were not  included.
The proportionate mortality  of the  smelter workers was compared with that of
males in the  state  of  Washington in 1958.   Of all  cancer deaths,  the respec-
tive proportions of  lung cancer were 41.9  and 23.7 percent.  The authors then
classified the smelter workers according to arsenic  exposure and did not find
any difference between exposed and  non-exposed.   However, the "non-exposed"
had elevated  arsenic levels  in  urine,  suggesting  possible exposure.   More
extensive studies  have  since  been  published, showing an  increase  in  lung
cancer among arsenic-exposed  workers  (Milham  and Strong, 1974; Pinto et al.,
1977;  Pinto  et  al.,  1978;  Enterline and Marsh,  1980;  Enterline and Marsh,
1982).
     Milham and Strong (1974)  examined county records from 1950  to  1971 to
find the number  of  deaths  due to respiratory cancer among  county residents
employed at the  smelter.   Expected  number of cases  were calculated  for the
smelter population by using  the  1960 age-cause  specific mortality statistics
for white males in the United  States.  Forty deaths  were observed and 18 were
expected.
     The two papers  by Pinto et al.  (1977, 1978) refer to the same study and
the following is based  on the 1978 paper.
     The cohort studied  consisted of 527 men who were  living  pensioners on
January 1,  1949 or who  became pensioners before  January 1, 1973.   Complete job
histories were obtained  for  525  men.   The average duration of employment was
013AS2/A                             5-26                             June 1983

-------
28 years, ranging  from  7 to 54 years and beginning in 1910.  Death certifi-
cates were obtained for all  324 men who had died during the observation period
(1949-1973).   Expected  numbers  of  deaths  were calculated  from statistics of
the state of Washington.
     An  exposure  index  was  constructed by using  data  on urinary levels of
arsenic obtained  in 1973.  Mean urinary concentrations were calculated for 32
departments,  and  the  individual  exposure index was obtained  by  multiplying
urinary arsenic level with  years  of work in  a department.  If an individual
had worked  in  more than  one  department,  the index values  were  added.   By
dividing the exposure  index  by the total number  of years  in  the smelter, an
index of  intensity of exposure was  obtained,  i.e., the average urinary level.
These indices were created to enable interdepartmental  comparisons and did not
reflect past exposure since air analysis  in the 1930s to 1940s indicated that
exposure might have been 5-10 times higher at  that  time.   It may have been
still higher in 1910.
     Data were also obtained  on smoking habits from all men  still alive and
from relatives of  men  who had died since January, 1961.   Table 5-4 (Pinto et
al., 1978) shows  that  there was a  significant  increase  (p <  0.05) in deaths
from all  causes,  in  cancer  deaths  in general, and, specificially, in deaths
from respiratory cancer.  Almost all of the excess mortality could be explained
by  the  increase  in lung  cancers  which could not  be explained  by smoking.
     Table 5-5 shows respiratory  cancer deaths in relation to exposure index
(a  value  which  reflects both the duration and  intensity of  exposure).  An
increase in SMR with exposure is seen.   Table 5-6 shows that both duration and
intensity of exposure  contributed  to  the excess  in respiratory  cancer.   As
stated above, the  urine values are relative  and  do  not  reflect the actual
exposure.


013AS2/A                             5-27                             June 1983

-------
    TABLE 5-4.   OBSERVED AND  EXPECTED  DEATHS  AND  STANDARDIZED MORTALITY  RATIO
         FOR SELECTED CAUSES  OF DEATH  OF  527  MALES OF COHORT UNDER STUDY*
Cause of death
All Causes
Cancer
Digestive
Respiratory
Lymph, etc.
Urinary
All Other Cancers
Stroke
Heart Disease
Coronary Heart Disease
All Other Heart Disease
Respiratory Disease
All Other Causes
Disease
Classification!

140-205
150-159
160-164
200-203, 205
180,181
330-334
400-443
420
480-493, 500-502

Observed
324
69
20
32
2
3
12
43
144
120
24
11
57
Expected
288.7
46.5
16.4
10.5
2.1
3.3
14.2
38.0
132.3
110.2
22.1
10.8
61.8
SMR
112.2+
148.4+
122.0,
304.8+
95.2
90.9
84.5
113.2
108.8
108.9
108.6
101.8
92.2
*Cohort consisted of living male pensioners from a copper-smelting plant who were
 living January 1, 1949,  and whose causes of death were noted through December 31,
 1973.

fNumbers from rubrics of 7th Revision of International Classification of Diseases.
+P<.05

Source:  Pinto et al. (1978).
     013AS2/A                             5-28                             June 1983

-------
       TABLE 5-5.   OBSERVED AND EXPECTED RESPIRATORY CANCER DEATHS AND
             STANDARDIZED MORTALITY RATIOS BY ARSENIC EXPOSURE INDEX
Exposure index
Under 2,000
2,000-2,999
3,000-5,999
6,000-8,999
9,000-11,999
12,000 and over
Mean index
1,514
2,513
4,317
7,473
10,135
14,712
Respiratory Cancer Deaths
No. of men
36
109
205
109
38
29
Observed
1
4
11
7
4
5
Expected
0.9
2.1
3.9
2.3
0.7
0.6
SMR
111.1
190.5
282.0*
304.3*
571.4*
833.3*
*p <.05

Source:  Pinto et al.  (1978).
TABLE 5-6.  OBSERVED AND EXPECTED RESPIRATORY CANCER DEATHS AND STANDARDIZED
       MORTALITY RATIOS BY INTENSITY AND DURATION OF EXPOSURE TO ARSENIC
  Intensity of                           Duration of exposure
    exposure             less than 25 years                25 years and more
(|jg/liter urine)  Observed     Expected     SMR     Observed     Expected     SMR
50-199
200-349
350 and over
2
4
3
2.1
1.5
0.5
95.2
266.7
600.0*
10
8
5
3.6
2.2
0.6
277.8*
363.6*
833.3*
  *P<.05

Source:   Pinto et al.  (1978).
     013AS2/A
5-29
June 1983

-------
     It was also  shown  that  the main excess occurred  in  ages 65-74 years,
whereas at higher ages  the  lung cancer rate was  closer  to expected rates.
     More recently,  Enterline  and Marsh  (1980;  1982)  conducted additional
studies on workers  at  this  same copper smelter in Tacoma.  A cohort of 2802
males who worked  a  year or more during the period 1940-1964 were identified.
Since a one-year  work  exposure was required for eligibility into the cohort,
actual followup did  not start  until  1941 and extended through 1976.  In the
cohort the vital  status of 51 could not be verified,  leaving 2751 persons.   In
that  group 1061  deaths had occurred.  There was  a significant increase in
total cancer mortality  which wholly  depended on  an  increase  in  deaths from
lung cancer.   Arsenic  exposure was estimated for  each man  on the basis of a
representative average urinary arsenic level for workers in a given department.
Using this representative  value,  an  individual  value was calculated for each
man  for each year of employment in  a  given department and a total exposure
estimate per individual  was  made by summing values  across all  jobs and all
years of employment.
     This method of estimating exposure differed from earlier methods employed
by Enterline and  coworkers  (Pinto et al. ,  1977;  1978)  in that estimates of
historic exposure,  based upon  simple linear interpolations  and extrapolations
of actual data from 1948-52 and 1973-75, were used to characterize exposure by
department, rather than  by 1973 urinary measurements.  Use of this new method of
analysis  partially  helped to  eliminate exposure  underestimates of  workers
employed  in the  early years of the  smelter operation.   However, the present
method did not totally  eliminate this bias  because urinary arsenic levels were
only determined  for workers  starting in  1948.   For  workers exposed  prior  to
1948 (approximately  80 percent of the present study cohort), urinary arsenic
values  for 1948-52  were assumed to  apply.   Furthermore,  the  average urinary
arsenic  level  for some departments may have been based on only a few samples,

013AS2/A                             5-30                             June 1983

-------
thereby limiting the usefulness of the departmental  average as a representative
measure of any  given  worker's  urinary arsenic level.  The  authors  did note
that in areas of  the  smelter where arsenic levels were reported to be high,
workers tended  to be  measured  more often for urinary arsenic.  Thus, averages
for those areas  were,  in fact,  more representative.
     Using this time-weighted  measure of exposure,  a  life  table  method for
accumulative dose, a 10-year lag period and a standard population of mortality
rates in  the state  of Washington, the authors reported that  SMRs for respira-
tory cancer ranged  from 155 in the lowest  exposure  category to 246 in  the
highest category.   Table 5-7  shows the relationship between the time-weighted
estimates of arsenic  exposure  lagged  0 and 10 years and  respiratory cancer.
                TABLE 5-7.  RESPIRATORY CANCER DEATHS AND SMRs
                 BY CUMULATIVE ARSENIC EXPOSURE LAGGED 0 AND
                       10 YEARS, TACOMA SMELTER WORKERS

Cumulative
Exposure (ug/As/1)
(urine-years)
<500 ( 302)
500-1500 ( 866)
1500-3000 ( 2173)
3000-5000 ( 4543)
7000+ (13457)

0 Lag
Observed
Deaths
8
18
21
26
31
Lag


SMR
202.0
158.4
203.2**
184. 1**
243.4**

10 Year
Observed
Deaths
10
22
26
22
24

Lag

SMR
155.4
176.6*
226.4**
177.6*
246.2**
* p<.05
**p<.01
()Mean of class interval
Source:  Enterline and Marsh (1982).
This relationship was  much weaker than that  previously reported by Pinto et
al. (1977; 1978).  Enterline and Marsh noted that results from the  two sets  of
studies were  not totally comparable due  not  only  to the differences in  the
exposure estimates  noted above,  but also to differences in followup periods.
013AS2/A
5-31
June 1983

-------
In earlier reports,  the followup started after exposure stopped at retirement,
whereas in the present  study,  followup started at varying points in the work
experience of the workers allowing for  followup and dose accumulation to pro-
ceed concurrently.   When the  authors  analyzed a subsample of  the present
study cohort, consisting of 582 workers retired at age 65 and over  (parallel-
ing the experimental design of the earlier studies), a stronger  dose-response
relationship was, in fact,  observed.
     Table 5-8 shows the respiratory cancer deaths and  SMRs  by duration of
exposure and time since first exposure.  In this particular  study,  it  would
appear that  neither  duration  of exposure nor long latent periods made strong
contributions to excess respiratory cancer.   The authors suggested that this may
have been due to the high SMRs observed shortly after termination of employment
but not noted thereafter; thus, for workers with less than 10 years of exposure
the SMR  is  highest  10-19 years  after date of  hire,  for workers  employed 10-19
years the SMR is highest 20-29 years after date of hire, etc.   When the authors
reanalyzed the data according to a method which followed workers only from the
point of termination or  retirement,  both duration of exposure and  intensity of
exposure contributed more strongly to respiratory cancer mortality  (Table 5-9).
The difference in the two analyses led  the authors to  suggest that  the  weak dose-
response  relationship  observed in the  first analysis  may have resulted from a
tendency for workers in  high exposure jobs to  leave employment  more  quickly than
those  in low exposure.
     In  studying the interactive effects of  sulfur dioxide,  the authors did
not find significant differences  in  respiratory cancer incidence in two depart-
ments  which both had high  arsenic  exposures  (7500 ug/m3) but  differing S02
exposures,  one having  low to  moderate  exposures (520  ppm)  and the  other having
 013AS2/A                             5-32                             June 1983

-------
o
I—>
co
to
ro
en
 i
CO
CO
                   TABLE 5-8.  RESPIRATORY  CANCER  DEATHS AND SMRs BY DURATION OF EXPOSURE
                                     AND  LATENCY,  TACOMA SMELTER WORKERS
Latency (Years)
Duration
(years)
<10
10-19
20-29
30+
Total
<10 10-19 20-29 30+ Total
Observed Observed Observed Observed Observed
Deaths SMR Deaths SMR Deaths SMR Deaths SMR Deaths
1 55.6 10 265.4* 17 210.1** 12
6 156.4 8 278.0* 4
13 197.0* 13
20
1 55.6 16 210.4* 38 216.3** 49
137.9
137.9
265.3**
221.3**
191.8**
40
18
26**
20
104
SMR
178.9**
187.2*
226. 1*
221.3**
198.1**
          * p < .05

          **p < .01


          Source:   Enterline and Marsh  (1982).
=3
fD
00
CO

-------
o
H-•
CO
00
no
en
i
CO
                                   TABLE 5-9.   RESPIRATORY CANCER DEATHS AND SMRs BY DURATION
                                       AND INTENSITY OF EXPOSURES, TACOMA SMELTER WORKERS
Intensity estimate
Duration of
exposure
(years)
<10
10-19
20-29
30+
Total
Lowt
No. at
risk
687
149
225
159
1220
Observed
deaths
15
7
10
9
41
Expected§
deaths
8.83
2.61
3.59
2.98
18.01
SMR
169.9
268.2*
278.6**
302.0**
227.7**
No. at
risk
824
168
171
165
1328
High++
Observed
deaths
25
11
16
11
63
Expected§
deaths
12.26
3.42
2.77
3.17
21.62
SMR
203.9**
321.6**
577.6**
347.0**
291.4**
        *  p < 0.05.
        ** p < 0.01.
        t  low = <290 [jg/As/A  urine  (mean  163).
        ++ high = >290 ug/As/£ urine  (mean 477).
        §  Based on Washington State  white males.

        Source:  Enter!ine and Marsh  (1982).
00
CO

-------
essentially none.  Because  the  respiratory cancer SMRs were quite similar in
the two departments,  the  authors suggested that SOp exposure did not play an
important role in respiratory cancer excess at that particular smelter.
     In discussing  their overall study  results,  Enterline and Marsh noted
that, in  this particular  case,  a dose  response was  not  observed when dose was
measured  in terms of  cumulative dose.    The  results  seen  in  Table 5-8 suggest
that short exposures  seemed to  have a disproportionately greater effect than
long exposures  and  that effects  of  early  exposure  tended to diminish with
time.   Table  5-9 suggests  that short high-intensity exposures may have a
greater effect  than  longer  term more low-level  exposures.   The  fact that
different results are obtained  when different exposure/followup methods  are
employed  suggest that choice of experimental design has a possible influence
on  results.   The possibility that  some workers  may  have  simply  been more
susceptible than others may also have accounted for the dose-response relation-
ships observed in this study.
     The  authors  did suggest that  if the responses were,  in fact,  due to
arsenic,  the role of  arsenic in  this  particular  situation may have been as
promoter  rather  than  initiator.  If this were the  case,  the significance of
cumulative exposure to  arsenic  as a measure of dose would be questionable in
regard to the induction of  respiratory cancer as  observed  in this study.  The
role of arsenic  as  an initiator  as  well  as  a promoter cannot be ruled out,
however.  Until  further  research is done, the authors'  conclusions from this
study remain speculative.
     Mortality of workers in a  smelter in Magna,  Utah,  was  studied  by Rencher
et al.   (1977).  Average hourly  air  concentrations of  arsenic in 12 work areas
                              3
were between  zero  and  22 mg/m   in  1975 (NIOSH,  1975).   However,  exposure
013AS2/A                             5-35                             June 1983

-------
before 1959 had  likely  been  higher,  since a processing  of  ore with a rela-
tively low arsenic  content began  in  that year.  In the period 1959 to 1969,
965 deaths  had occurred  among  all  current or former employees,  and  death
certificates were  obtained  for virtually  all  deceased.   The proportionate
mortality for smelter workers was  compared with that for mine workers, concen-
trator workers,  refinery, and office workers, and for the population  above 20
years of age for the entire  state  of Utah in 1968.   Among the smelter workers,
7 percent of the deaths were  due to respiratory cancer,  whereas the percentage
for the  other factory employees varied  from  0 to 2.2 percent  and was 2.7
percent for the  state.  Data on smoking  were obtained for all  smelter workers
and for subsamples  of the other employee groups and indicated  that nonsmoking
smelter workers had the same percentage of deaths from lung cancer as mine and
concentrator workers who  smoked.  By applying life-table methods, age-adjusted
death  rates were obtained.   For smelter workers a death rate for  lung cancer
of  10.1 per 10,000  was  obtained compared with  2.1 and 3.3 per  10,000  for  mine
workers and the  state population,  respectively.  Causes of death were  compared
with  a cumulative exposure index  obtained  by multiplying number of days spent
in  each department  by the average exposure level and then summing.  The average
exposure  to  arsenic as well  as sulphur  dioxide,  sulphates,  lead,  and copper
were  found  to be higher  for the  lung  cancer cases than for other causes  of
death.
      In addition to these studies, a  large  study by  Lee and Fraumeni (1969)
 involving  8,047  white males  was conducted  at  an Anaconda Copper  Smelter  in
Montana  from 1938 to 1956.*  Data were  obtained on time, place,  and  duration
      *While  the original  Lee  and Fraumeni study reported  on  the mortality
 experience of  male  smelter workers  in  unidentified  states,  subsequent  analyses
 of these  workers  indicate  that they were  employed solely  at the  Anaconda  smelter
 in Montana.
 013AS2/A                             5-36                             June 1983

-------
of  employment  for  each individual, all  subjects  having  worked at least 12
months in  the  smelter  during the indicated study period.  Follow-up was from
1938 to 1964.  Death certificates were obtained, and the life-table method was
used to compute  the expected number of  deaths,  using mortality rates of the
State of Montana.  The smelter workers were classified into 5 cohorts based on
total years of smelter work and the time period in which the years were worked:
(1)  15 or  more worked before 1938; (2)  15  or  more years worked between 1938
and  1963;  (3)  10-14 years; (4) 5-9 years; and (5) 1-4 years.  An attempt was
also made to classify the workers according to exposure to arsenic and sulphur
dioxide.   Exposure to arsenic for more than 12 months had occurred among 5,185
men.  These  workers  were  divided into three groups; heavy, medium, and light
exposures.    This  division was  based  on exposure times  and  place at work.
Arsenic concentrations  in  air were  primarily determined  from a 1965  survey by
Public Health  Service  officials (NIOSH, 1975).  These air data are  shown  in
Table 5-10.
     According to a former Public Health official associated with this survey,
actual measurements  were  collected during two different periods—one in 1965
and  one "about five to six years  earlier"--and  at  several   locations within
given departments  (Archer,  1983;  personal communication).    It is impossible,
however,  to determine how the values listed in Table 5-10 are distributed over
these different time periods and locations.   Further, it is also impossible to
determine the  number  of hours  sampled at a  given location.   Therefore, the
arithmetic means used  by  Lee and Fraumeni  to  characterize heavy,  medium and
light exposures, can only be viewed as very rough estimates of arsenic exposure,
their primary value being in their relative scale of measurement.
     In Table  5-11  it  is  seen that heavy and  medium exposures resulted in
significant  increases  in  SMR for respiratory  cancer.   The  SMR was  highest
(800) in workers belonging to  cohort  1  (more  than  15 years of smelter work

013AS2/A                              5-37                             June 1983

-------
                     TABLE 5-10.  1965 SMELTER SURVEY ATMOSPHERIC
                          ARSENIC CONCENTRATIONS (mg As/m3)
                                                     Median:  0.185
        "Heavy exposure area" as classified by Lee and Fraumeni
Arsenic Roaster Area                          Mean-   1 47
               O0~          0.20
               0.10           0.22
               0.10           0.25
               0.10           0.35
               0.10           1.18
               0.10           5.00
                        0.17
                             12.66
                "Medium exposure area" as classified by Lee and Fraumeni
Reverberatory












Treater Buildi
Area
0.03
0.22
0.23
0.36
0.56
0.63
0.66
0.76
0.78
0.78
0.80
0.83
ng and Arsenic

0.93
1.00
1.27
1.60
1.66
1.84
1.94
2.06
2.76
3.40
4.14
8.20
Loading
                                                       Mean:
                                                     Median:
                                                     1.56
                                                     0.88
                                      ~O8~
                        0.10           0.62
                        0.10           3.26
                        0.11           7.20
                                              Mean:
                                            Median:
         1.50
         0.295
                "Light exposure areas" as classified by Lee and Fraumeni
         Copper Concentrate Transfer System            Mean:  0.70
                        OS                         Median:  0.65
                        0.65
                        1.20
         Samples from Flue Station
                        (TTD
                        0.24
         Reactor Bui 1 din
                          001
                        0.002
                        0.002
                        0.002
                              0.003
                              0.009
                              0.010
  Mean:
Median:

  Mean:
Median:
0.17
0.17


0.004
0.002
Source:   National  Institute of Occupational  Safety and Health (1975).
       013AS2/A
                                   5-38
                                                                             June 1983

-------
TABLE 5-11.  OBSERVED AND EXPECTED DEATHS FROM RESPIRATORY CANCER, WITH STANDARDIZED
    MORTALITY RATIOS (SMR), BY COHORT AND DEGREE OF ARSENIC EXPOSURE, 1938-63
Cohort
All cohorts
combined

1


2


3-5+


Number of persons i
arsenic category*
Respiratory
cancer
mortality
Observed
Expected
SMR
Observed
Expected
SMR
Observed
Expected
SMR
Observed
Expected
SMR
n

Heavy
18
2.7
667t
8
1.0
soot
6
0.9
667t
4
0.9
444§
402

Maximum exposure to
arsenic (12 or more
months)*
Medium
44
9.2
478t
22
3.3
667t
12
2!2
545. t
10
3.8
263§
1,526

Light
45
18.8
239t
14
5.6
250t
9
2.9
310t
22
10.3
214t
3,257

*The remaining 2,862 men in the study worked less than 12 months in their
 category of maximum arsenic exposure and had an SMR of 286t-

tSignificant at the 1% level.

+Cohorts 3, 4, and 5 were combined, since observed and expected deaths
 were small for each cohort alone.

§Significant at the 5% level.

Source:   Lee and Fraumeni (1969).
     013AS2/A
5-39
June 1983

-------
before 1938),  and then decreased to  263 among workers with  1-14  years  of
smelter work.  Among the  workers  with light exposure, the SMR was 250, 310,
and 214 in  cohorts  1,  2,  and 3-5,  respectively.   Among  the smelter workers
with less  than 12 months exposure to arsenic, the SMR was 286.
     Lee and  Fraumeni  also  looked at factors  that  possibly  had confounding
effects on their study results.   Smoking histories were not recorded; however,
based upon information obtained from other studies, Lee and Fraumeni concluded
that smoking  alone could  not have accounted  for  the excess respiratory cancer
mortality of the magnitude observed in their study.
     In contrast  to smoking, the authors  did  note a positive  relationship
between exposure  to sulfur  dioxide  and  respiratory  cancer mortality;  however,
they found  it difficult to separate the  relationship of arsenic from sulfur
dioxide.   Most of the work areas having heavy arsenic exposure were also areas
having medium sulfur  dioxide exposure;  conversely, all work  areas with heavy
sulfur dioxide  exposure were areas of medium  arsenic exposure.  The authors
did  note,  however,  that persons with the  heaviest exposure  to arsenic  and
moderate or  heavy exposure  to sulfur  dioxide were those  most likely to die of
respiratory cancer in this particular instance.
     Since  the  Lee  and Fraumeni  study,  additional research  has  been conducted
on the employees  of the Anaconda smelter.  Lubin  et al. (1981)  studied 5403 of
these  employees.  These workers had all  been  employed  for  12 months or  more
between January 1, 1938 and December 31, 1956  and were known  to be alive as of
December 31,  1963.   Essentially,  this cohort  was equivalent  to the  surviving
members from  the  Lee and  Fraumeni cohort.
     Exposure was from date hired  to December 31,  1963;  follow-up was  from
1964  to  1977.  Classification of exposure  categories  was  similar to that of
Lee and Fraumeni.  However,  unlike  the  study of  Lee and  Fraumeni,  a  cumulative


013AS2/A                              5-40                             June 1983

-------
arsenic exposure index was calculated for each worker.   This index was derived
by, first, weighting  the  three exposure categories and then multiplying the
number of years  an  individual  worked in a given category by this weight and
summing over categories.   The  weights were derived from mean  airborne dust
concentrations taken  during  1943  to 1958,  which averaged 11.3, 0.58 and 0.29
mg As/m3  in  the  respective heavy, medium and light categories.  These values
differed from those used by Lee and Fraumeni  to group departments (Table 5-9).
It should be  noted  that the exposure estimates used by Lee and Fraumeni were
based upon more  recent monitoring data primarily  collected  in 1965.   Lubin
et al.  reduced weights  in the  heavy category by a factor  of 10 in order to
account for the  wearing of respirators as was  observed  "at least in recent
years."  SMRs were calculated by comparisons  to U.S. white males.
     The mortality experience  of  workers during the years  1964 to 1977 was
similar to that  of  the workers studied by Lee and Fraumeni during the period
1938-1963.  Excess deaths from respiratory cancer  corresponded to  areas of
highest arsenic  levels.   The authors  noted an overall  strong gradient  in risk
associated with  the   indices of cumulative arsenic exposure.    However,  the
authors also noted that this gradient was less  clear  when weighting of the
high exposure category  was reduced ten-fold  to account for respirator usage.
According to Welch et al. (1982), however, respirator usage was not common
prior to 1964.
     Some study  differences  were  noted by Lubin et al. between their respec-
tive study and  that  of Lee and Fraumeni.  Differences in excess  respiratory
cancer—65 percent in the more recent period  versus a three-fold excess in the
earlier period—were partially attributed to  differences in respiratory cancer
rates observed  between the two comparison populations.   Respiratory cancer
rates in  the  general  populace have increased  in  recent years; therefore,

013AS2/A                             5-41                             June 1983

-------
comparisons  to  recent populations  will  produce  lower  relative  risks than
comparisons  to  past general populations  in  which the rates of  respiratory
cancer were  lower.   The  authors also noted  that  the  comparison  populations
differed in  composition.   Lee  and Fraumeni  used  white males in  the State  of
Montana as their  standard  population,  whereas Lubin  et al.  used U.S.  white
males.  As noted  in this study, as well  as  elsewhere (Welch et  al., 1982;
Higgins et al., 1982), death rates  for specific causes of  death  (inclusive of
respiratory cancer)  have been  reported to be lower in Montana.   Finally, the
authors suggested the  possibility that individuals most susceptible to  lung
cancer contracted the  disease  in the earlier period  and were, thus,  lost  to
the study follow-up due to  death.
     In looking at  S02 exposures, the authors were unable  to totally separate
the possible  interactive effects  of SO^ with arsenic.  However,  they did note
that after controlling for  arsenic,  no significant increase in mortality could
be associated with heavy or medium S02 exposures,  whereas  the association with
arsenic exposure persisted  after controlling for S02-   This finding is consis-
tent with that  of other researchers studying smelter populations  (Enter!ine
and Marsh, 1982; Welch et al.,  1982; Higgins et al.,  1982).
     In an update of the earlier study co-authored with Fraumeni, Lee-Feldstein
(1982) observed the  mortality  experience  of the  same Anaconda workers  (with
the exception of two women) from 1938 to 1977.   The workers (8045) were assigned
to one of  five  cohorts on  the  basis of total years of employment.  Cohort 1
worked 25 + years; cohort 2, 15-24 years;  cohort 3, 10-14 years;  cohort 4,  5-9
years, and cohort 5, 1-4 years.  SMRs were  calculated  by  comparison to the
combined white  male  populations in  the States of Idaho, Wyoming and Montana.
013AS2/A                             5-42                             June 1983

-------
     Of  the  thirteen specific  causes  of  death  considered, tuberculosis,
digestive and respiratory cancer, vascular lesions of the CNS,  diseases of the
heart, emphysema, and cirrhosis  of the liver showed a significant excess of
observed deaths  over that expected; however,  only excesses in respiratory
cancer showed a  positive gradient with length of  employment when comparing
cohorts  1  through 5.   The  ratio  of  observed to  expected  mortality from
respiratory cancer was approximately 5.1,  4.5 and 2.3 in the heavy, medium and
light  arsenic-exposure  groups,  respectively.  This  was  in  accord with the
earlier  results  of  Lee  and  Fraumeni,  except  that the  ratio  of  observed
respiratory cancer deaths to  that expected in the heavy exposure  category in
the earlier study was 7.  The results of this study continued to support those
of the earlier studies.
     In  still another study  of  this Anaconda smelter,   Higgins et al.  (1982)
reported on a sample of 1800 workers.  Compared to the 8047 workers studied by
Lee and Fraumeni, the cohort of Higgins et al. included all  the workers origi-
nally  designated  in  Lee and  Fraumeni's heavy exposure  category (277)  and a
random sample (20 percent) of the  remaining  known  workers.  The date of entry
into the study  cohort  ranged from 1938 to 1956,  providing the  individual  had
one year of  work experience.   Unlike other studies on these workers, smoking
histories on the 1800 workers were obtained either by direct questioning or by
proxy  respondent.  SMRs were based on comparisons to standard populations both
in the State of Montana as well  as white males in the United States.
     From industrial  hygiene records for the period 1943 to 1965,  estimates of
airborne arsenic  concentrations  within 35 smelter departments were provided.
A total  of 818  samples  were collected from  18  departments  and departmental
averages were calculated  from  these measurements.  The  remaining  17 depart-
ments were estimated by analogy with those that were known.  The  departments


013AS2/A                             5-43                             June 1983

-------
were then grouped  into  four categories in which arsenic exposure was charac-
terized as low (< 100 ug/m ), medium (100-499 pg/m3), high (500-4999 ug/m3) or
very high (> 5000 pg/m ).
     Workers were  assigned  to these categories based upon estimations of both
time-weighted average (TWA)  arsenic  exposure levels and ceiling  levels. TWA
values were individually calculated based upon the time that a worker spent in
a given department and  the  average arsenic  concentration estimated  for that
department.   This  quantity  was  summed across all departments the individual
worked in and was  divided by total time worked  to yield a TWA.   TWA arsenic
exposures were calculated at entry into the  study cohort and at the  beginning
of January,  1964, corresponding to the end of the follow-up period used by Lee
and Fraumeni.   TWA differences between these two periods could have  increased,
decreased, or remained the same depending on the work history of an  individual
worker.    In contrast,  ceiling levels were defined  as  the highest level to
which an employee was exposed for a period of 30 days or more.   Ceiling levels
were calculated  at entry  into cohort, at the  beginning of 1964 and at the
beginning of 1978.   Unlike  a TWA value, a worker's  ceiling level could only
increase or remain the same from point of entry into the cohort.
     Data were analyzed according to five different exposure/follow-up methods
which varied in  the amount of overlap allowed between exposure and  follow-up
periods.   Method I,  the primary method used by  the authors,  included each
worker's arsenic exposure up to the date he entered the cohort.   Follow-up was
from entry  to 1978;  thus, there was  no  overlap  of the two periods.  Method
IV—exposure from  date hired to 1964, follow-up from 1964 to 1978--also had no
overlap.   Methods  II  and  V had complete overlap—exposure from date hired to
1964, follow-up  from  1938 to 1964 and exposure from date hired till termina-
tion, follow-up  from 1938  to 1978,  respectively.   Method  III  had  partial
013AS2/A                             5-44                             June 1983

-------
overlap—exposure  from  date hired  to  1964, follow-up  from 1938 to 1978.
Except where  specifically  noted,  results were given according  to  Method I.
     The results of  the study supported the thesis that exposure to arsenic
was strongly  related  to respiratory cancer mortality in workers at the  Ana-
conda Smelter.  SMRs for the total cohort for all causes of death were identi-
cal when compared  to either the  State  of  Montana  or U.S.  white males (both
SMRs = 133, significant at 0.01 level); however, SMRs for specific causes were
somewhat higher when  compared to  Montana than when compared to  the U.S.  Expo-
sure to arsenic appeared to be  the  principle factor  in  the  observed increased
risk for  respiratory cancer,  the study  cohort  having  3 times  the expected
death rate  for white men living  in Montana.  Exposure  to other occupational
contaminants, such as  sulfur  dioxide  and asbestos, did not appear to account
for respiratory cancer  excess,  while  smoking explained only a small  fraction
of the excess.
     Of particular note were the differing respiratory cancer results obtained
under the  two categories  of arsenic exposure (Tables 5-12 and 5-13).  The SMR
for men in  the  lowest TWA category was  elevated,  although  not  significantly
so, whereas  the SMRs  in the other TWA  categories were significantly elevated.
Mortality for respiratory  cancer  by ceiling arsenic exposure  showed that SMRs
were only  signficantly  elevated in  the  high and  very high categories, whereas
they were  close to expectation  in the  two  lower  exposure categories.  Date of
hire showed  a definite relationship  to mortality  from respiratory cancer.
Workers that  were  employed in the early years of the smelter operation—from
1884 to 1938, but particularly prior to 1923,  when a selective floatation proc-
ess which markedly improved fume  and dust  recovery was  introduced--had higher
SMRs,  indicating that the  overall higher arsenic exposures  in the early  years
were associated with  higher death rates  from respiratory cancer.  Age at hire


013AS2/A                             5-45                             June 1983

-------
TABLE 5-12.   MORTALITY FOR ALL CAUSES AND RESPIRATORY CANCER FROM 1938 TO 1978
                 BY TIME-WEIGHTED AVERAGE (TWA) ARSENIC EXPOSURE
                         AS OF ENTRANCE INTO COHORT
Ceiling
Arsenic
3
(pg/m ) N
<100
100-
500-
5000-
* Signi
** Signi
Source:
547
542
565
146
ficant at .05
ficant at .01
Higgins et al
Person-
Years
13152
14157
13460
3552
level
level
. (1982).
Respiratory
All Causes Cancer
Obs Exp SMR Obs Exp SMR
219 196.7 111* 11 7.9 138
216 178.0 121** 22 7.3 303**
292 184.7 158** 29 7.7 375**
89 56.1 159** 18 2.6 704**



 013AS2/A
5-46
June 1983

-------
         TABLE 5-13.   MORTALITY FOR ALL CAUSES AND RESPIRATORY CANCER
                          BY CEILING ARSENIC EXPOSURE
                           AS OF ENTRANCE INTO COHORT
Ceiling
Arsenic
(ug/m3)
<100
100-
500-
>5000
Respiratory
Person- All Causes Cancer
N Years Obs Exp SMR Obs Exp SMR
445 10591 165 152.1 108 8 6.2 129
276 7083 80 80.5 99 4 3.4 116
833 20757 416 288.5 144** 41 11.8 348**
246 5889 155 94.4 164** 27 4.1 662**
*  Significant at .05 level

** Significant at .01 level
Source:  Higgins et al.  (1982).
013AS2/A
5-47
June 1983

-------
did not seem to have a confounding effect, although the authors did note that
the SMRs for respiratory cancer showed more fluctuation with age than did all
causes of death.
     Tables 5-14  and  5-15 show comparisons of  TWA and ceiling respiratory
cancer mortality  as analyzed by the different exposure/follow-up methods. The
                                                             '.  *"
authors noted that, while  there  was some variation in the SMRs derived from
the different methods, the  same  basic pattern  of  increasing TWA and ceiling
SMRs with  increasing  arsenic  exposures  could be seen for each method.  Of
particular significance were the  results shown in Table 5-15.  The SMRs for
the low and medium ceiling categories were lower when each man's ceiling was
calculated as of  1964  (method  III) and  as  of his lifetime (method V), than
when calculated as  of  entry into the cohort  (method  I).  The  authors  inter-
preted these results to indicate  that workers exposed only to  arsenic  concen-
                       3
trations below 500  ug/m   would probably experience little mortality  due to
respiratory cancer.
     A number of  criticisms have been made of  this study (48  FR 1864), a few
of which bear mentioning at this point.
     The representativeness  of the  exposure estimates as they  relate  to  over-
all exposure conditions  in the smelter  and specifically to  the cohort's TWA
and ceiling exposures  has  been criticized.  The authors  noted  that individual
worker exposure estimates,  based upon area measurements rather than personal
samples, would  not likely  have great precision.   Furthermore, estimates of
analogy—as in 17 of the departments—weaken  the  reliability of overall exposure
estimates, although areas that were thought to  be  "problem" areas  of high expo-
sure  were  areas that  were generally measured.   The extent  to which respirator
usage was  an effective protective measure  is  also  unknown.   In interviews with
former workers,  however,  indications were that the use of  respirators was  not
widespread or regular  during the  period  prior to  1964.  Collectively,  the problems

013AS2/A                              5-48                              June  1983

-------
o
i—"
co
GO
no
UD
                  TABLE 5-14.  RESPIRATORY CANCER MORTALITY  BY  METHOD  OF  ANALYSIS
                                     AND TWA ARSENIC CATEGORY
TWA
Arsenic
(ng/m3)
<100
100-
500-
^5000


N
547
542
565
146
Ia

Obs
11
22
29
18
METHOD OF
II]

Exp
7.9
7.3
7.7
2.6

SMR
138
303**
375**
704**

N
522
580
515
183

Obs
5
28
29
18
ANALYSIS
r D

Exp
7.9
7.8
7.1
2.7

SMR
63
359**
408**
673**

N
354
410
313
111
IV

Obs
4
16
9
9
c

Exp
4.8
5.1
4.2
1.6


SMR
84
313**
216*
573**
 *Signifleant at .05 level

**Significant at .01 level



aExposure from date hired to cohort entry.   Follow-up  from cohort entry to 1978.
            Exposure from date hired to 1964.

           'Exposure from date hired to 1964.
           Source:  Higgins et al. (1982).
                                    Follow-up  from  cohort entry to 1978.

                                    Follow-up  from  1964 to 1978.
Cj

=5
ro

_i
^•0
co

-------
                                            TABLE 5-15.  RESPIRATORY CANCER MORTALITY  BY  METHOD  OF  ANALYSIS
                                                             AND CEILING ARSENIC CATEGORY
1 — »
to
3»
£2 Ceiling
Arsenic
(ug/m3)
<100
100-
500-
^5000
Ia

N
445
276
833
246

Obs
8
4
41
27

Exp
6.2
3.4
11.8
4.1

SMR
129
116
348**
662**

N
275
218
970
337
METHOD OF ANALYSIS
III IVC

Obs
3
2
41
34

Exp
4.0
2.5
13.8
5.2

SMR
75
79
298**
652**

N
178
152
656
202

Obs
3
0
20
15

Exp
2.3
1.6
8.7
3.0

SMR
130
-
230**
496**

N
267
210
969
354
Vd

Obs
3
2
41
34

Exp
3.9
2.4
13.7
5.5

SMR
77
83
300**
617**
            *Significant  at .05 level
           **Significant  at .01 level
 en
 o
            Exposure  from date  hired to cohort entry.   Follow-up front cohort entry to 1978.
Exposure from date hired to 1964.
Exposure from date hired to 1964.
Exposure from date hired to 1978.
Follow-up from cohort entry to 1978.
Follow-up from 1964 to 1978.
Follow-up from cohort entry to 1978.
           Source:  Higgins  et  al.  (1982).
oo
CO

-------
regarding exposure  estimates probably  tended  to affect  results  such that
exposure values were  underestimated  from 1884 to 1938, were  reasonable for
1938 to 1964, and were overestimated for the period after 1964.*
     Of even greater  importance  is the classification of a limited number of
workers  (approximately  22 percent  of  the total Anaconda  cohort)  into the
various ceiling categories.   While classifying workers according to exposure
levels, irrespective  of  duration,  may  have some plausibility, i.e., measures
of .exposure  other than cumulative exposure might possibly correlate better
with respiratory cancer, the fact that Higgins et al.  drew such conclusions on
small sample sizes  has  been questioned.  (This issue is discussed in greater
detail in Section 5.2.1.4.)   By analyzing  risk according  to ceiling  category,
a significant proportion  of  workers  in  the  low and medium  TWA  categories were
placed in high ceiling categories -- 21 and 60 percent, respectively -- result-
ing  in small sample sizes  in the two lower  exposure categories.   (This  can  be
seen by comparing the sample sizes in Tables 5-12 and 5-13.)  The risk of lung
cancer mortality  as predicted using  a  linear dose-response model  (see  Quanti-
tative Section  5.2.1.4  of this  chapter) cannot be detected given these small
sample sizes.
     In order to  address  this issue, Higgins et al. are presently  undertaking
a study of the entire Anaconda cohort;  however, results of this study will  not
be forthcoming till  1984.  In the interim, the authors' conclusions drawn from
this study remain speculative.
     In foreign smelters,  an excess in lung cancer mortality has also been
found. The Ronnskar smelter  in Sweden,  which has been  processing arsenic-rich
'Requests by the  U.S.  EPA for the actual exposure data have been granted by
I.  Higgins.   Further discussion  of  this  data is intended pending receipt of
the information.

013AS2/A                             5-51                             June 1983

-------
ores since the 1920s,  has been the subject of several  studies.   Axelson et al.
(1978) made  a case-control  study  of mortality from  respiratory  cancer in
relation to employment at that smelter.   In the parish surrounding the smelter,
369 deaths have been recorded in the registers for men aged 30-74 years during
the years  1960 to 1976.  Causes of death were obtained in all cases.   Smoking
habits were  obtained  from  medical  files.   Cases were defined as subjects who
died of malignant'tumors of the lung, other cancers, cardiovascular disease,
cerebrovascular disease, and  cirrhosis  of the liver.  The control  group was
made up of persons  from the same parish who  died from causes other than the
above, excluding  44 persons  with  diabetes,  mental  deficiency  and unclear
diagnoses.   Attempts were  made to assess exposure  and  four  exposure  groups
were constructed, based on intensity and duration of exposure and time between
initiation of  exposure  and death.   It was found that exposure to arsenic was
associated with  a  significant increase in deaths from  lung  cancer.   For  the
three exposure groups  with at least  3  months of exposure occurring 5 years
prior to  death,  the lung cancer mortality  ratio  was 4.6.    In these groups,
there was  an increase  with exposure  intensity.   For the  fourth  group  in which
exposure  was essentially nonexistent;  or,  first exposure was for  periods  less
than 3 months and/or death occurred within 5 years  of this first exposure, the
sample  size  was  too small  to detect  risk  in this  exposure  group that  would be
predicted  by a linear dose-response model.
     The  influence  from  other  agents, including sulfur dioxide, to  these other
agents  did not seem to  be associated with  lung cancer.  In  83  percent of  the
lung  cancer cases  there was  a history  of  smoking.   It was not  stated  how  the
smelter  employee differed from the other cases.   A  study of  smoking habits by
Pershagen  (1978) showed that  the  excess  lung cancer mortality could  not  be
explained  by smoking  habits.


013AS2/A                              5-52                              June 1983

-------
     Because a high lung cancer mortality rate was noted among males in Saganoseki-
machi, Japan for the period 1967-69, Kuratsune et al.  (1974) did a case-control
study of  lung  cancer  cases in that town.  The nineteen cases of  lung  cancer
for the period 1967-69 were compared with nineteen controls randomly selected
from deaths  of diseases  other than cancer of the lung, skin, or  bladder for
the 1967-69 period.  Smoking and drinking habits, residential  and occupational
histories, and exposure  to atomic bomb radiation were the  factors  compared.
Fifty-eight  percent  of  lung  cancer cases  were found to  be former smelter
workers vs.  15.8  percent in the controls (p <0.01).  The relative risk was
reported  to  be 9.0  (confidence  limits not reported).  The author did not
indicate that confounding variables were controlled for in the estimate of the
relative risk.  No difference was found between the  cases  and controls for
smoking habits, residential history, drinking habits,  or atomic bomb radiation.
     Tokudome and  Kuratsune  (1976)  did a cohort study  of 2765 male workers
including 839 copper smelter workers at the metal refinery in Saganoseki-machi,
Japan.   Deaths  which occurred between 1949  and 1971 were  analyzed in the
study.   The  expected  number of deaths  was calculated  using  mortality data  for
Japanese males.  A significantly increased mortality was noted for lung cancer
(SMR =  1189; observed =  29; expected = 2.44; p <0.01) and colon cancer (SMR =
508; observed = 3; expected = 0.59; p <0.05).   A dose response was demonstrated
between lung cancer mortality and the degree of exposure measured by length of
employment and level  of  exposure.  A  very high  excess  mortality from  lung
cancer (SMR = 2500; 10 observed;  0.4 expected; p <0.01)  was found among smelter
workers who  had worked  in the heaviest exposure category and who had  been
employed over 15  years  before 1949.  The latent period in  this study  ranged
from 13 to 50 years.
013AS2/A                             5-53                             June 1983

-------
     Studies have also been performed to see if there is any increase in lung
cancer among  residents  in areas surrounding smelters.   Lyon  et al.  (1977)
compared the  incidence  of lung cancer and  lymphoma  in  Utah residents from
1970-1975 in relation to  the  distance of these residents from a smelter and
found no association.   It should be noted that distance from the smelter was
based on address  at  the time  of diagnosis;  nothing  regarding  the length of
time lived  near the  smelter was  factored into the analysis.  Furthermore, use
of  lymphoma cases as controls is questionable  since  lymphomas  may also be
associated with arsenic (Ott et al., 1974).   Thus,  the conclusion of the study
that there was no association  between lung cancer and distance from the smelter
is questionable.
     In  a  more recent  study,  Rom  et al.  (1982) compared  lung  cancer with
breast and  prostate  cancer in residents  living near a non-ferrous smelter in
El  Paso, Texas.   The study period ranged from 1944-1973.  Similar to methods
used by Lyon et al. (1977), comparisons were made in relation to distance from
the smelter.  Breast and prostate cancer were chosen as control  cancers because
they have  no  known association with arsenic exposure.   The authors  reported
that  the distribution of  lung cancer  cases (575)  and control cancer  cases
(1490) was  roughly the  same for  the different  distances  studied.   No associa-
tion between  lung cancer and  distance from the smelter was found,  nor were
there any  associations  for race, age  or  sex.   However,  the  authors  did note
that they  were unable to  control for such  factors as smoking, occupation and
migration,  and were  unable to obtain environmental  exposure  measurements over
most of  the years  studied.
     In  Montana,  the studies  by  Newman et  al.  (1976)  showed that there was  an
increase  in the  incidence of lung  cancer  among men in  cities where copper
 013AS2/A                             5-54                             June 1983

-------
smelters are located.  In one of the cities there was also an increased inci-
dence of lung  cancer among  women.   It was not stated to what extent occupa-
tional exposure had caused the increase,  and there was no control for smoking.
     In the Blot and Fraumeni study (1975),  the cancer mortality in 71 counties
with smelters  and  refineries was studied from 1950 to 1969.  Comparisons were
made with  the  remaining  2,985 counties in 48  states.   In 36 counties with
smelters processing  copper, lead,  or  zinc  ores,  lung cancer mortality was
significantly  higher both among males  (p < 0.01) and  females (p  < 0.05).  For
all 36 counties with these industries the median SMR was 112 for males and 110
for females.  Although occupational cancers  were included in the analyses and,
therefore,   contributed to some  of  the excess risk, the  number of workers in
the smelter industry generally comprised a small fraction of the total popula-
tion  (less  than 1 to  3  percent);  thus,  it was  unlikely that  occupational
exposures alone accounted for the  observed  excess mortality in  males or the
increased  risk for  females,  Although this study is suggestive of  a lung
cancer effect  in populations  surrounding smelters, it is unknown if the lung
cancer cases were  even exposed  to  arsenic.   Thus, the results,  although sug-
gestive, are inconclusive.
     In the Baltimore, Maryland  area,  Matanoski et al.  (1976; 1981)  studied
cancer mortality in areas near the  earlier mentioned pesticide facility.   They
found an excess of all cancers and  respiratory cancers among males in the area
nearest to  the factory but  not among females.   Soil  arsenic levels generally
corresponded to lung cancer and all cancer incidences, with the highest average
of arsenic  in  the  soil (63  ppm) reported in the area  with the greatest cancer
risk.  The  authors were  unable  to  account for the differences noted  between
males and  females, but suggested  that smoking may have  contributed to these
differences.   Other  environmental  factors and/or  occupational  exposure  may


013AS2/A                             5-55                             June 1983

-------
have also influenced cancer mortality excess.  Further environmental sampling
of arsenic and conducting community surveys were recommended to address these
unknown factors.
     Pershagen et al.  (1977) studied cancer deaths  in the area  surrounding the
Ronnskar smelter in Sweden.  From 1961 to 1975 there was a significant excess
of respiratory cancers  in  the  male  population (SMR = 250) compared to resi-
dents in an area without known emissions of arsenic but  in which the same age
distribution  and  occupational  profiles  applied.   When  the  occupationally
exposed cases were excluded, significant increases  in respiratory cancers were
no  longer detected  (SMR 173);  however, the  male population  still  showed a
tendency to excess  lung cancers.   No similar occupational  group was excluded
from the comparison population, however.   There was no tendency to an increase
in lung cancer among women.
5.2.1.2.2  Cancer of the skin and precancerous skin lesions.   An elevation in
the proportionate mortality  of skin cancer was reported by  Hill  and Faning
(1948) for  factory  workers  manufacturing sodium arsenite and by Roth  (1957,
1958) for German vintners.   In addition, an increased incidence of skin cancer
has been reported after long-term oral exposure to  arsenic.
     In Taiwan a large population had long-term exposures to inorganic arsenic
in  drinking water.   Exposure started in 1910-20 when water was obtained from
deep wells,  100-200 m.  below  the surface.  Already  in  the  1920s vascular
changes began  to  appear and in the  1950s  the  first epidemiological studies
were conducted.   The  arsenic content of the water varied  from 0.01 to 1.82
mg/1 (Chi and Blackwell,  1968; Astrup, 1968,  and  Tseng  et al.,  1968;  Tseng,
1977), generally  being  0.4 - 0.6  mg/1, whereas water  from  shallow wells or
other  surface waters generally  contained  from near zero to  0.15 mg As/1.
013AS2/A                             5-56                             June 1983

-------
     Tseng et al.  (1968),  and  Tseng (1977) have reported the results from a
large scale epidemiologic  survey  of arsenic-related diseases in an area with
high arsenic concentrations  in  drinking water.   The population  at  risk was
103,514 persons.   Thirty-seven  villages with  a population  of  40,421  were
surveyed  house-to-house.   Examinations  were made with  special  attention to
pigmentation,  hyperkeratosis, and cancer of the skin.   Four hundred twenty
eight cases  of  arsenical  skin  cancer were  found  resulting in  a  rate  of
10.6/1000.  No cases  were under 20 years of age.  The prevalence rate increased
markedly with age  except for females >70.   Over 10 percent of the people >59
were affected by  skin  cancer.   The overall male/female ratio was 2.9:1, with
males having a higher rate in all  age groups >29.
     The villages were  divided  into 4 exposure levels:  <0.3, 0.3-0.6,  >0.6,
and undetermined, based on their water arsenic content.  There was a clear cut
ascending gradient of  prevalence  from low to high  in  each of 3 age groups
(Table 5-16).
                TABLE 5-16.   PREVALENCE OF SKIN CANCER (per 1000)
                       BY AGE AND ARSENIC EXPOSURE (ppm)
Arsenic content
of drinking water
(ppm)



<.3
0.3 - 0.6
>0.6
20-39
1.3
2.2
11.5
Age
40-59
4.9
32.6
72.0
>60
27.
106.
192.

1
2
0
Source:   Adapted from Tseng, et al.  (1968).
013AS2/A                             5-57                             June 1983

-------
     Hyperpigmentation (melanosis)  was  found in 18.4  percent  of the total
population, 19.2 percent for males and 17.6 percent for females.  Usually the
prevalence was higher  for  males  than females.  The rates increased steadily
with age  for  males  and did likewise for females until a peak was reached at
50-59,  followed by a gradual  decline.
     The overall prevalence rate  for keratosis was 7.1 percent - 7.5 percent
for males  and 6.8 percent  for females.  Males had  higher rates  in the greater
than 49 year group.   The prevalence increased for both males and females up to
age 70 and then declined.
     As was the case  for skin cancer, the prevalence rates  for  hyperpigmenta-
tion and  keratosis  suggested that  positive correlations existed between  these
conditions and the  arsenic content of the water  in  the artesian wells; the
greater the arsenic content, the higher the prevalence.
     In the total  survey  of 40,421  people,  7418 cases of hyperpigmentation,
2868 of  keratosis,  428 of skin cancer, and 360 of blackfoot disease (Section
5.2.2.2) were  found.   Many of these  occurred in combination in  the  same  indi-
vidual .
     The data were examined by comparing expected  (based on overall rates) and
observed  rates  for  various combinations of  the 4  end points.    The obtained
ratios indicated quite strongly that a common underlying cause  existed for the
4 conditions, presumably chronic arsenicism.
     A  control  population  of 7500 persons from nonendemic  areas was examined
in  the same way as the arsenic  exposed persons.   4978 people  lived on Matsu
Island;  its  water supply  was  from shallow wells and  no arsenic was  detectable
by  the analytic methods used in  the main series.   The remaining portion  of
control  population  members came from 5 villages on Taiwan  whose water  source
 013AS2/A                              5-58                              June 1983

-------
was  shallow  wells with arsenic levels  between  0.001-0.017  mg/£ (ppm).   No
cases of  melanosis,  keratosis,  or skin cancer  were  observed  in the entire
control  population.
     Although age of  onset  of the conditions was  difficult to assess,  some
information on  latency was obtained.  "We know  from  the study  that the young-
est cancer patient was 24, the youngest with hyperpigmentation was 3, and the
youngest  with  keratoses  was  4".    This  meant  that  hyperpigmentation could
occur in  patients who were exposed  from birth for  at least 3 years, keratosis
for 4 years,  and cancer for 24 years (Tseng et al., 1968).
     While the Taiwanese data collected in the late 1960's  strongly implicated
arsenic as the  etiological  source of the observed diseases, recent findings
have called to  question the  hypothesis of arsenicism as sole causative source
in the induction of cardiovascular effects.   The discovery  by  Lu et al.  (1977b;
1978) of  fluorescent  compounds identified as alkaloids—either  lysergic acid,
dihydrolysergic acid  or a  derivative of ergotamine  tartfate--has opened the
possibility that  other toxic mechanisms may have been involved.  Ergotamine-
like compounds  in  combination with high alkalinity,  characteristic of these
waters,  have been shown to cause gangrene (Lu et al.  , 1977a,b;  1978).   Whether
these compounds have a confounding effect on skin cancer is presently unknown.
     In addition,  recent analyses by Irgolic (1982)  on a  limited number of
samples have  shown the water samples  to contain predominantly pentavalent
arsenic and no organic arsenicals.  Samples taken from two  wells in the,Yenshei
Province of Taiwan were collected in plastic cubitainers.   Two samples each of
unpreserved water and water preserved either by addition of 0.1 weight percent
of ascorbic acid  or  by acidification of 0.1 M HN03 were sent  to the U.S.  for
analysis a few days after  collection.  Treatment of samples by HNO, or ascorbic
013AS2/A                             5-59                             June 1983

-------
acid was done immediately upon collection (Irgolic, 1983; personal communica-
tion).   Samples were  analyzed  during  a two-week period after arrival in the
U.S.; the total  time lapse between collection and analyses ranging from one to
three weeks.  The  results  of the analyses can be seen in Table 5-17.  Addi-
tional  water  samples  collected  from  other parts of  Taiwan  also  contained
pentavalent arsenic.  However, these  samples were less reliable  in  that the
collection period  was unknown,  and,  upon arrival in  the  U.S., these samples
had  a  yellowish hue with some flocculated  matter present (Irgolic, 1982).
     Several questions  still  remain  to be answered in regard to  water-usage
patterns of the  Taiwanese.   For  instance, it  is  not  clear how quickly the
water drawn from the wells was consumed; nor is it clear how much of the water
was  consumed  in  tea or  other beverages  where  cooking preparations,  such as
boiling, would have altered the chemical form of the  arsenic.  These questions
need to  be answered in  light of the possible affect  these answers might have
on  interpreting the observed skin cancer incidence.
     Chi and  Blackwell  (1976) conducted a case-control  study  in  the area  of
Taiwan  studied  by Tseng et al.  The  authors compared a  variety  of  factors
between  353  cases of blackfoot disease  and  353  controls  matched  for sex  and
age.   Socioeconomic status,  occupation,  cigarette smoking,  diet,  and consump-
tion  of deep well water which  was  arsenic-contaminated were the  factors
compared.   Two  factors  were found to  be significantly different  between  the
cases  and  controls.  Significantly (P <  0.01) more cases than controls were
found  to consume  deep well  water  and to have a  lower socioeconomic status.
Though  the author concluded that  the  primary  contributing  cause  of  blackfoot
 013AS2/A                             5-60                             June 1983

-------
                         TABLE 5-17.  RESULTS OF TOTAL ARSENIC ANALYSES AND ARSENITE
0 MNU HKOtlNrtlt Utl tKmiNHI iUINO ilN 1 nt rclNOnti WttICK iHrifLCCr
h— '
co
Ascorbic
Sample Acid 0.1%
Well I
—
Well II
en
i _
01
TOTAL ARSENIC, ppm
0.1 M Un-
HN03~ preserved HGa
+ - 0.84+0.02
0.88+0.01
+ 0.8510.01
+ - 1.0510.08
1.1610.03
+ 1. 1110.02
ICPb
0.7310.01
0.7210.01
0.7310.01
0.9510.01
0.9610.01
0.9810.01
Arsenite, ppm
by HG
0.024+0.001
0.02210.001
-
0.02410.01
Arsenate, ppm
by HG
0.85+0.01
0.83+0.08
-
1.08+0.02
     ^Average + average  deviation  of at least three determinations  per  sample.
     aHG =  Hydride  generation  technique.
       ICP = Inductively  coupled  argon plasma emission  spectrometry.
     Source:  Irgolic  (1982).
CO
CO

-------
disease was  consumption  of deep well  water,  the socioeconomic differences
cannot be completely discounted.
     Other studies  have  also explored the  relationship  of  arsenic to skin
cancer and various  skin  lesions.   Similar chronic effects as seen in Taiwan
have been reported in other countries.
      In Antofagasta, Chile, a new water supply was obtained in 1958.  In the
1960s, physicians began noticing dermatological  manifestations  and even deaths,
especially among children.   In an investigation  of skin pigmentation in 27,088
school children  from  the  provence  of Antofagasta, an overall  incidence of 12
percent was reported.   It was discovered that the drinking water contained 0.8
mg As/1.   Borgono  and Greiber (1972) compared 180 inhabitants  of Antofagasta
with a community without  exposure  to arsenic via  drinking  water.   Abnormal
skin pigmentation  was reported to be present  in 80 percent and  hyperkeratosis
in 36  percent  of the Antofagasta inhabitants whereas  none were found  in  the
control group (p <  .05).
     In 1970,  a water treatment  plant  was  installed and  there was  a  consider-
able drop  in arsenic.  According to  Borgono et al. (1977), there were  no  skin
lesions in children born  since the water  treatment began.  However,  it should
be noted that in this more recent study the sample size of children born  since
the water  treatment plant began was small  (306) and no comparison population
was studied.   Therefore, any conclusions associating the lack of dermatological
manifestations  with the  decrease in arsenic must take into account the small
sample size.   In regard to skin cancer, the follow-up may not have been  long
enough to  detect a  difference.
 013AS2/A                              5-62                             June 1983

-------
     In addition to the work of Borgono and co-workers, Zaldivar and Guillier
published a series of  papers  on the Antofagasta situation  (Zaldivar,  1974;
Zaldivar, 1977; Zaldivar  and  Guillier,  1977).   The first of these (Zaldivar,
1974) describes a study on a total  of 457 patients  (208 males and 249 females)
bearing cutaneous lesions (leukoderma, melanoderma, hyperkeratosis, and squa-
mous cell carcinoma).  The  cases  were collected both  by  the author and the
local hospital during  the period 1968 to 1971.  Children 0 to 15 years of age
accounted for  69.2 percent  of the male cases and 77.5 percent of the female
cases.   The average incidence/100,000 for cases  with cutaneous lesions in 1968
to 1969 were 145.5 and 168.0 for males and females, respectively.   By 1971 the
incidence rates had  dropped to 9.1 and 10.0  for males and females, respec-
tively.   The  decline  in  morbidity  was so rapid that caution  should be exer-
cised before  concluding  that  the  arsenic was the cause of the skin lesions.
     The existence of  arsenical waters  in an eastern area of the province of
Cordoba, Argentina,  has  been  known for many decades (Arguello et al. , 1938;
Bergoglio,   1964).   Effects  noted  on the  population from this area include
hyperpigmentation, keratosis,  and  skin  and  respiratory cancer.   A large area
of the  province,  mainly  in  the east and somewhat to the south,  is  the focal
point for chronic endemic regional  arsenical intoxication (CERAI) (Arguello et
al., 1938).   This CERAI  is  due to  the ingestion of  well water coming  from the
uppermost sheet of underground water - the principal  source  of  arsenic - as
well as  due to the ingestion  of arsenic from the wells, which varies within
wells throughout  the region.   The concentration also  varies with rainfall.
Vanadium is also elevated in areas with high arsenic content.  A  later report
(Bergoglio, 1964)  indicates that  progress  had been made  in improving the
hygienic condition of the drinking water.
013AS2/A                             5-63                             June 1983

-------
     Arguello et  al.  (1938)  summarized the early  history  of  investigations
(1913 to mid-1938)  into  the  health outcomes associated with the ingestion of
arsenic contaminated water.  They  also reported the results of an investiga-
tion of a  large  series  of epitheliomas collected  from mid-1932 to September
1938 at the  dermatosyphilology clinic of a medical  school  in the arsenic-
contaminated area.  The  series consisted of 323 cases of epithelioma of which
39 or 12.1 percent were cases with clinical  evidence of CERAI.
     Patients exhibiting  CERAI had characteristic  cutaneous  lesions, repre-
sented by  the symmetrical pal mo-plantar keratoderma  and melanoderma, although
the latter symptom  was  seen  less frequently.   Foot and hand keratoderma were
seen in 100 percent of the CERAI  patients.   Appearance usually occurred 2 to 3
years after  the  onset  of intoxication.  A  prodrome  of  the keratosis is the
appearance of an erythema in the  same  location,  and a subjective crawling
sensation and local fever.  Otherwise, it is a state of dryness which precedes
the keratosis.
     Arguello et  al.  (1938)  also reported that most patients also had hyper-
hidrosis and abnormalities of pigmentation.   The melanoderma appeared early in
the process  and  was variable among patients.   It was described as small dark
spots ranging in diameter from 1  to  10 mm.   They  had  a tendency  to  coalesce
and appeared predominantly  on  the trunk in the areas not exposed to the sun.
Atropy may be associated with telangiectasia and loss of color, or leukoderma,
between the hyperpigmented areas (the "raindrop" appearance cited by Reynolds,
1901).
     Geographically, the largest proportion of cases in the  clinic came from
the areas  with  the  highest  incidence  of CERAI.   Because the authors'  data are
not population  based,  however,  it cannot  be stated that the incidence  of skin
013AS2/A                             5-64                             June 1983

-------
cancer is significantly  increased  in  these areas.   The authors reported that
the hands and feet are the locations of choice for the arsenical epitheliomas
(38.5 percent vs  3.9  percent)  compared to the nonarsenical epithelioma.  An
example of this can be seen in the head where 81.6 percent of the nonarsenical
epitheliomas occur versus 15.4 percent for arsenical  epithelioma.
     Bergoglio  (1964)  did a proportionate mortality  study of residents of
certain  departments  (counties)  in the Province of Cordoba,  Argentina where
endemip  arsenic levels in  the water supply are reported to be  very  high.  The
proportion  of  cancer deaths was  higher in those departments  than  for the
province  as  a  whole (23.84% versus 15.3%  P  <0.05).   Of the cancer deaths,
respiratory cancer constituted 35% and skin cancer 2.3%.  From the description
by the author,  it can probably be inferred that this data is not age-adjusted.
No comparison  is  made of the percentage of respiratory and skin  cancer  deaths
in the affected departments with the respective proportion for Cordoba Province.
     Morton et  al.  (1976)  investigated  the relationship of skin  cancer  morbi-
dity and the ingestion of  arsenic-contaminated drinking water  in Lane County,
Oregon.   The southcentral  region  of Lane County  is  underlaid by an  arsenic
rich stratum called the  Fisher formation which is known to produce high arsenic
levels in waters  from wells drilled into the land.  An extensive search of the
pathology records of  medical  providers in Lane County, Oregon, was conducted
in  1972  for the  occurrence of  skin cancer during the years  1958 to 1971.
Cases were  thoroughly  screened  to eliminate duplications and were then coded
to 1970  census  tract  numbers according  to  the residential  address at  the time
of diagnosis.   Water  samples  were obtained  in all census  tracts at selected
points in all  municipalities  and water districts  in  the  county, as  well as
from single family water sources.   The single family water sources were neither
013AS2/A                             5-65                             June 1983

-------
randomly nor  uniformly distributed throughout  the  county but instead were
heavily concentrated in  the  regions  believed to have water arsenic problems.
Water samples collected  during  1968  to 1974 were compiled into mean concen-
trations for each  census  tract  and census tract region.  The authors stated
that it seemed  reasonable  to assume  that the samples were representative of
the earlier time periods as well.
     The skin cancer data were  expressed  in  four sets of  rates because of the
availability of 4 sets  of population  estimates.   Overall mean annual incidence
rates for the entire 1958 to 1971 period  used mean population estimates based
on all  four sets of denominators.   Census tract regions were devised to simplify
analysis and presentation.   Table 5-18 presents the water arsenic level  obtained.
As can be readily seen  the South rural area had a much greater arsenic exposure
than any of the  other  sections  of the  county.   Figure 5-1 contrasts the parts
of the county underlaid by the Fisher formation, and subsequent higher arsenic
levels, with the  parts of the county  experiencing higher squamous  cell skin
cancer.   Relatively little concordance is noted.  A multiple regression analysis
performed by  the author demonstrated  essentially  no relation between skin
cancer and water  arsenic.   It should be  noted  that  water arsenic levels in
this study varied  from 0 to 2150 ppb.   The  authors  point out that the Lane
County water arsenic levels were much lower than those reported for Taiwan and
Antofagasta.   In particular  only  5 percent  of  the  Lane County samples con-
tained 100 or more  ppb of arsenic  in  contrast to 48  percent  of the  samples  in
that range in the Taiwan data.
013AS2/A                             5-66                             June 1983

-------
                  TABLE 5-18.   LANE COUNTY WATER ARSENIC LEVELS 1974-1978
                           Arsenic, p.p.b.
Geographic region    mean*
         range
                              1970 Population served
                                by water districts
                                Sol
no of samplesnumber% of area residents
Rural
North
East
South
Midwest
Coast
Urban
NE Springfield
SW Springfield
S Eugene
W Eugene
NW Eugene
N Eugene
Core Eugene
16.5+
7.6
11.8
33.0
9.7
4.7
4.8
3.9
6.0
5.3
6.5-
3.8
3.8
4.0
0-2150
0-24
0-70
0-2150
0-107
<1-13
0-860
0-8
0-30
0-750
0-860
<1~8
0-8

-------
vn

oo
                                 FISHER FORMATION
                                            URBAN
                                     EUGENE - SPRINGFIELD
                    RURAL
                 LANE COUNTY
                    HIGH RISK  |>X +t,.0/2 Sy

                j   | VERY HIGH RISK |>~X+2t,.0/2 Sy.x/vAN|
                          URBAN
                   EUGENE - SPRINGFIELD
   RURAL
LANE COUNTY
                     Figure 5-1. Comparison of census tracts experiencing exposure to the Fisher formation and
                     exhibiting high skin cancer occurrence.

                     Source:  Morton et al. (1975).
OO

-------
     Similar findings were  reported  by Southwick et  al.  (1981)  in a study
conducted on residents of West Mi Hard County, Utah.   As  an area in which
naturally occurring arsenic  in public drinking water had been reported, West
Millard provided an "excellent "opportunity to study  the  effects  of  arsenic
exposure on  a  homogeneous,   stable population  with  a predominantly  'Mormon
lifestyle1" (Southwick et al., 1981).   The exposed communities of Hinckley and
Deseret had average arsenic  concentrations of 0.18 mg/1  and 0.27 mg/1,  respec-
tively (based upon monthly water samples  taken between  May 1976 to May  1977).
The control  community of Delta had average  arsenic concentrations of  0.02
mg/1.   All drinking water in the study communities  came  from wells  and the
predominant species of arsenic was  reported as the  pentavalent  form (85%).
     All study participants  from  the  exposed communities were required to be
five years of age  or  older  and to have been residents of Hinckley or Deseret
for at  least the  previous  five years.  Control participants were selected at
random  from  age  and  sex categories   matched  to the  exposed  participants.
Control participants were required to have lived their  entire lives  either  in
Delta or communities where arsenic in drinking water did not exceed the national
standard of 0.05 mg/1.
     Physical examinations were conducted to detect signs and symptoms associ-
ated with  chronic  arsenic poisoning.   A  total of 250 people  participated in
these examinations (145  exposed,  105  control); not all  of these participated
in each part of the examination, however.  No  explanation was provided  by the
authors as to the differences in participation rate for different parts of the
examination.   Urine and  hair samples  were collected  from  94  and 74 percent  of
the participants,  respectively.  Dermatological examinations were conducted on
249 individuals.    Neurological and  hematological  examinations  were  also
013AS2/A                             5-69                             June 1983

-------
conducted and  are  discussed  in  Section  5.2.2.1  and  5.2.2.4,  respectively.   In
addition, the  incidence  of cancer and vascular diseases  in  the study popu-
lation was compared to other counties in the State of Utah.
     The  study results showed  a clear relationship  between  the  amount of
arsenic consumed in drinking water and  the  amount measured in  hair and  urine.
Differences between exposed and control populations were statistically signif-
icant.
     Of the  249 participants examined  for  dermatological  signs of arsenic
toxicity  (palmar  and  plantar keratosis and hyperkeratosis,  tumors,  diffuse
pigmentation, arterial insufficiency), only 12 showed such signs and no parti-
cipant had more than  one sign.   The  12 individuals were not clustered  among
the more  heavily  exposed and when the  dermatological signs  were regressed
against annual arsenic dose  and the  log of the dose,  no significant associa-
tions were found.
     Age adjusted  cancer  incidence rates  showed Hinckley  to have a somewhat
lower cancer  incidence than  Delta.   Cancer death rates, 1956 to 1976, showed
Hinckley to  have the  highest rate (138  per  100,000) when compared to  42 other
Utah communities.   However, this was  based on an estimate of  population distri-
bution in 1960, since census data were only available  for 1970.  Table 5-19
shows age specific death  rates  for Utah and three Mi Hard  County communities.
(Fillmore is  the County seat; comparisons to Deseret  were  not  made due  to  the
community's small   population).   Between 1956 and 1976, 14 cancer deaths were
reported for  Hinckley.   All  of  these deaths occurred in individuals 45 years
or older  and  the cancers  were types most frequently reported for Utah:  lung,
breast, large intestine,  prostate, stomach,  leukemia,  kidney, uterus,  bone and
connective tissue.   Hinckley  had generally  lower death rates for cardiac and
013AS2/A                             5-70                             June 1983

-------
                  TABLE 5-1S.  AGE SPECIFIC DEATH RATES  FOR  UTAH
                       AND THREE MILLARD COUNTY COMMUNITIES
                               (DEATHS/100,000/YEAR)
Community
Characteristics
CANCER
State
Fill more
Delta
Hinckley
CARDIOVASCULAR
State
Fil Imore
Delta
Hinckley
CEREBROVASCULAR
State
Fil Imore
Delta
Hinckley
ARTERIOSCLEROSIS
State
Fil Imore
Delta
Hinckley
AGE GROUP SIZE
State
Fil Imore
Delta
Hinckley
Age Groups and (Number of Deaths)
0-4

7 (158)
0
0
0

1 (25)
0
0
0

1 (24)
0
0
0

0
0
0
0

119,004
157
202
40
5-14

6 (274)
14 (1)
0
0

0.4 (18)
0
0
0

0.5 (23)
0
0
0

0.07 (3)
0
0
0

224,417
347
400
108
15-24

6 (223)
0
22 (1)
0

1 (34)
0
0
0

1 (36)
0
0
0

0.2 (7)
0
0
0

175,607
202
224
57
25-44

19 (875)
17 (1)
61 (4)
0

18 (840)
17 (1)
30 (2)
0

4 (201)
0
0
0

0.5 (21)
0
0
0

227,502
293
330
79
45-64

149 (4749)
196 (13)
189 (11)
390 (6)

275 (8788)
392 (26)
344 (20)
325 (5)

52 (1651)
60 (4)
34 (2)
0

13 (406)
15 (1)
17 (1)
65 (1)

159,613
332
291
77
65+

558 (7680)
706 (25)
986 (29)
1053 (8)

2079 (28587)
1638 (58)
1599 (47)
1316 (10)

797 (10965)
1017 (36)
1088 (32)
789 (6)

202 (2781)
311 (11)
272 (8)
395 (3)

68,759
177
147
38
Death rates from 1956-1975 for cancer,  cardiovascular disease,  cerebrovascular disease,
and arteriosclerosis,  showing numbers  of deaths and the average size of the age group.

Source:   Southwick et  al.  (1981).
       013AS2/A
5-71
June 1983

-------
vascular diseases than did the control community of Delta.  The authors noted
that no unusual  death  patterns  likely to be associated with arsenic exposure
were seen in Hinckley.
     Certain weaknesses exist with  this  study; most notably,  that of a small
study population from which to derive meaningful statistical analyses.   Further-
more, children  and  adults  were  not treated  separately.   In regard  to  sample
size, the authors felt that the small  sample size was  somewhat compensated by
the  homogeneity and stability of the  predominantly non-smoking  population.
Data on food consumption were also missing which might have influenced urinary
arsenic levels.  This, in  turn, may  have  resulted in overstating  the strength
of  the  dose-response relationship for  urinary  arsenic  and arsenic in drinking
water.  It  should  also be noted that some participants were reported to have
an  average  water consumption greater  than  8£,  which  seems very  high,  even
taking  into  account the  hot summers.  In  reporting on the lack  of arsenic-
related effects in  this  study population  compared  to  others  (Tseng et al.,
1968; Borgono and Greiber, 1972; Borgono et al. , 1977; Zaldivar,  1977; Zaldivar
and Guiller,  1977), the  authors  did note that  populations in  Taiwan and Anto-
fagasta were exposed to considerably higher  concentrations  of arsenic  in their
drinking water.
      Interestingly, the importance attached  to  the  fact that  no adverse effects
were seen in  this  group  of  individuals  exposed to drinking water  arsenic
levels  four times  that allowed by  the Interim Primary Drinking Water  Regula-
tions  (0.05 mg As/1), is  somewhat  compromised by the  very characteristics of
the population that make  it  useful  for  epidemiological study.  The fact that
this study population  is so homogeneous  and  stable  and,  therefore,  lends
itself  to a relatively well-controlled  statistical analysis, also makes it
 013AS2/A                             5-72                             June 1983

-------
less useful in terms of being representative of the overall population of the
U.S.  For this reason,  any generalizations that might be drawn from this  study
population are subject to limitations.
     In addition to  exposures  via drinking water, food exposures and thera-
peutic exposures have also caused skin lesions and cancers.   Hyperpigmentation
and depigmentation of the skin were found  to be common  among  the survivors of
the Morinaga  milk poisoning  in  1955.   A  follow-up study conducted on  the
exposed children when they  were  17-20 years of age showed the prevalence of
lesions to be  15  percent (Yamashita et  al.,  1972).   It is not known if any
skin cancers have developed.
     Hutchinson (1888) first reported on a possible association of skin cancer
with the  use  of  arsenical  medicines.   Prior to that, the association between
these  arsenical  agents  and keratotic  lesions  had been recognized.  In  his
classic paper,  Hutchinson  reported on 6  patients with case  histories  who
exhibited the  keratotic  lesions  associated with arsenical poisoning.  He felt
that the clinical series supported two principal conclusions:

     1.   Prolonged  internal use of arsenic may seriously affect the
          nutrition  of the  skin  and that  use  may produce warty  or
          corn-like  indurations.
     2.   Continued  use  of arsenic may  result in a  tendency for
          these  "arsenic  corns"   to grow  downward and pass  into
          epithelial cancer.
     Neubauer  (1947)  later  compiled a  series  of reports on  143 cases of  medi-
cinal  arsenical  epitheliomas.  He excluded five categories of cases reported
in  the  literature  to keep  the series  consistent  with regard  to  diagnosis  of
case and  history of  arsenical  use.  Seventy-one percent of  the patients  being
treated with  arsenical  medicine  were patients suffering from skin  diseases,
013AS2/A                             5-73                             June 1983

-------
especially psoriasis (54  percent).   In contrast, only a small percentage of
the cases reported came from patients treated with arsenic for various internal
disorders.  In nearly  all  cases the drugs used were inorganic and almost all
were trivalent.  The most commonly used arsenical was potassium arsenite.  No
externally applied arsenic-related skin cancer case was reported in the series.
     The  elapsed time  from  the beginning of administration of the arsenical
drug to the beginning of the epitheliomatous growth was variable,  but averaged
18 years  regardless of the  type  of lesion.  In  cases with  keratosis, the
latent period  to  the  onset of  keratosis was about  half the latent period to
the onset of  the  epithelioma,  i.e., about  9 years.  Thirty-three percent of
the patients were  40  or younger.   Of  the  143  patients,  13 had or developed
miscellaneous  cancers  at  other  sites,  but  such  cases were  not reported syste-
matically.
     Fierz (1965)  reported a follow-up study of patients treated with  arsenic
by a private practitioner.  An accurate assessment of the total  arsenic intake
in terms  of the amount of Fowler's Solution administered was available to the
investigator from  patient  records.   The  follow-up  examination was conducted
under the auspices of  a local  polyclinic.  Fourteen  hundred  fifty patients
were  identified  as having received arsenic treatment,  and invitations were
mailed for them to come for  a  free  follow-up medical examination.  During the
period March  1963  to April 1964,  262 patients  presented themselves for exami-
nation.   Two  hundred  eighty  patients  were not located while  100 patients
actively  refused  to participate.   Only patients  under 65  years  of age were
invited  to  participate in the  study.  The author admits  that the patients
reporting for  examination were not a representative  sample.   In fact,  he
categorizes them  into  three  groups  which  range the  spectrum of  likely biases.
There were patients satisfied with the results of  the  arsenic  treatment and


013AS2/A                             5-74                              June 1983

-------
wishing  to  express thanks,  patients in whom  disturbing  side effects were
occurring,  and finally patients who  were  still  suffering from the  initial
disease and who were eager to get a consultation.
     Arsenic treatment was prescribed for individuals suffering primarily from
three main  skin  diseases:   psoriasis  (64 patients),  neurodermatitis  (62), and
chronic eczema (72).  In addition, treatment was also prescribed for 64 patients
suffering from assorted skin diseases other than those listed above.
     Fierz  noted  that  the arsenic treatment showed  good  success.  Of  the 64
cases of  psoriasis,  55 reported a favorable effect  while taking the drops.
Forty-eight of 62 patients with neurodermatitis reported a favorable effect.
This effectiveness  was the  cause for the patients'  reliance on  the drug.
     Upon examination,  106 of  262  patients  (40.4 percent) reported  hyper-
keratoses,  although frequently  a detailed examination was  necessary  to  find
the changes.  Hyperkeratoses were round, superficially verrucose papules, 1  to
3 mm in diameter.  The number and the exact presentation of the hyperkeratoses
varied from case to case.
     In the series, 21 cases of skin cancer were found comprising 8 percent  of
the total subjects.  As  was in the  case of  hyperkeratosis, some variability
was observed  in   the expression of the skin cancers.   Multiple basal  cell
carcinoma was  the most frequent  histologic  type observed, occurring  in 48
percent of  the cancer  patients.  The basal  cell carcinomas appeared morpho-
logically as polycyclic,  sharply bounded erythemas with slight infiltration.
In 13 of the 21 cancer cases, multiple carcinomas were observed, a much higher
proportion than had been observed with other causes of skin cancer.   Of the  21
patients with  carcinomas,  16 showed distinctly developed  arsenic warts on the
palms  and soles simultaneously with the skin tumors.
013AS2/A                             5-75                             June 1983

-------
     Both hyperkeratosis and skin  cancer  were found to vary with increasing
arsenic intake.   Above 400 ml  of Fowler's  solution,  more than 50 percent of the
patients studied showed hyperkeratosis.   As the dose increased there was a cor-
responding increase in the simultaneous  occurrence of hyperkeratosis of the palms
and soles.  Only 2/15 cases of hyperkeratosis with intakes of up to 250 ml had
a simultaneous presentation, while 16/27  had  a simultaneous presentation with
intake of 250 to 500 ml.
     As with the hyperkeratosis, skin cancer increased with increasing arsenic
doses.  Below 500 ml only basal cell  carcinomas were found; spindle cell carci-
nomas were only found above that dose.   The latency period for hyperkeratosis was
at a minimum 2.5  years; skin cancer, however, had a minimum latency period of 6
years with a mean latency period of 14 years.  Knoth (1966) also reported on two
patients  treated  with aresenical medicinals  and  who  developed skin cancer.
     Roth  (1958)  reported  that of 47 autopsy  cases  of  vintners  with  chronic
arsenic intoxication, 13 had skin tumors.
5.2.1.2.3   Other  cancers.   Whereas  there are many studies  suggesting  that
there  is  an association between  inhalation exposure and respiratory cancer  and
oral  exposure  and skin cancer,  there are no consistent data with regard to
cancer in internal  organs.
      Reymann  et al.  (1978)  have investigated the relationship  between the
intake of arsenic for medicinal purposes and subsequent internal  neoplasms.
Study  subjects  were identified by examining the files of a dermatology clinic
in  Denmark for the years  1930 to  1939.   Two  rosters of  study  subjects were
generated:   1)  persons  treated with  arsenic  for multiple  basal  cell  carcinoma,
Bowen's disease,  psoriasis, Verruca planus, and Lichen planus, and 2) persons
with  keratoses from  the  first  roster plus  30 other persons  identified  as
having keratoses.   The first  roster of 413  persons  comprised the  basic study


013AS2/A                            5-76                             June 1983

-------
population; 24 persons were excluded for various reasons resulting in a final
study population of  389  persons.   The malignancy history of both populations
were traced through  the  years 1943-1974 in the Danish Cancer Registry.  For
each person a  length of observation period was  determined and an expected
number of  internal malignant  neoplasms were determined using the former data.
     In the main study  population,  41 cases were observed  versus 44.6 cases
expected.   Therefore,  no increased  incidence  of internal  malignancies was
noted in the arsenic-treated  patients.   However, examination of the data by
individual  skin disease  categories showed that only women with multiple basal
cell carcinoma had a significantly  higher incidence of internal  cancer.   The
same trend, although not significant, was observed in female patients exhibit-
ing verruca pi anus.   Next,  an analysis was made of a possible dose-response
relationship using duration of treatment as the exposure variable.  The cate-
gories were low, medium  and high, based on <1 month, 1-3 month,  and >3 month
duration of  standard dose administration  (6-8  mg As,,CL).   No relationship
between dose and internal  organ  cancer was noted for the total population or
by  sex.  In addition, the form of arsenic administered did  not seem to affect
the incidence of internal  cancer,  nor was any effect noted due to period of
observation.   Reymann et al.  did not provide a definition of the term "internal
cancer".    It is presumed that the authors included  lung cancer in their defi-
nition.   If  so,  the  authors  did not  provide  any adjustment for smoking.
Regardless, the sample size of 389 persons is probably too  small to detect an
excess in the incidence of internal  cancer,  even if lung cancers were excluded.
     The keratosis group was  not analyzed in the same way.  Eight of the 19
men with keratosis died  before 1974.   Four of these were due to cancer of the
internal  organs.   Expected deaths were 1.9.   Similarly,  5 deaths due to cancer
of  the internal organs  were  observed in the 34 women with keratosis compared

013AS2/A                             5-77                             June 1983

-------
with 3.3 expected.   Together there were 9 deaths due to cancer of the internal
organs compared to 5.2 expected.  Although the  figure  is almost doubled it is
still not significant.   On  the average, the patients with keratosis received
higher doses of arsenic than the other patients.
     Hemangioendothelioma and reticulosarcoma of the liver has been reported by
Roth (1958) to occur among German vintners exposed  occupationally to arsenic.
The same type of malignancy occurrence has also been reported in isolated cases
by several authors (Pershagen and Vahter, 1979).  Higgins et al.  (1982) reported
increased mortality for  cirrhosis  of the liver and urinary cancer in workers
at the Anaconda Montana smelter.
     Knoth (1966) reported on two patients who had been treated with arsenical
medicinals and developed tumors at sites  other  than the  skin  or  lung.  One of
the patients was  a  61-year old woman  who had been  treated with  an  arsenical
medicinal and developed  mammary carcinoma.   The other case was that of a 53-
year old  male who  had been treated with an arsenical medicinal for cirrhosis
vulgaris and developed a reticulosarcoma of the glans penis.
     In the studies by Ott et al.  (1974), an increased proportionate mortality
due to  malignant  neoplasms  of lymphatic and hematopoietic tissues was found.
Axelson et  al.  (1978)  found an increased risk  of leukemia and myeloma in a
case-control study of workers exposed  at a smelter.
5.2.1.3   Experimental Studies  of Arsenic  Carcinogenesis--Arsenic  carcinogeni-
city  in test animals  has  not been  generally  observed.   The literature on
experimental inorganic arsenic carcinogenesis,  as summarized  in Table 5-20 and
as reviewed by scientific bodies (NAS,  1977; NIOSH,  1975; IARC, 1973 and 1980)
and individuals (Sunderman, 1976; Wildenberg, 1978;  Pershagen and Vahter, 1979),
supports  this conclusion.
     In  view  of  the presently  recognized anomalous  metabolizing of  inorganic
arsenic by rats, studies which  used  rats  as the experimental  subjects have not

013AS2/A                             5-78                            June 1983

-------
o
h- '
CO
rv> Route
;C-
Oral
Oral
Oral
Oral
Oral
Oral
i
UD Oral
Oral
Oral
Oral
TABLE 5-20. SUMMARY TABLE OF
Species (Strain)

Mice (C57B16)
Mice (Swiss)
Mice (Swiss)
Mice (NMRI)
Mice (C3H/St, female)
Rats (not specified)
Rats (Bethesda Blacks)
Rats (Osborne-Mendal)
Rats (Long Evans)
Rats (Wistar)
Compound
As2°3
AS2°3
NaAsp£
As203
NaAs02
Pb3(As04)2
As2°3
NaAsO,,
NaAs02
Pb (AsO ).
Na^AsO/* ^
Pb3(As04)2
EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES OF ARSENIC CARCINOGENESIS
Vehicle Results*

Tap water
or 12% aqueous
ethanol
Drinking water
Drinking water
Drug (Psor- +(?)
Intern) or
Fowler's solu-
tion
Drinking water
Not specified
Tap water
or aqueous
ethanol (12%)
Diet
Drinking water
Diet
Diet
+ NDEA Diet
IDEA Diet
Reference

Huepert &
Payne, 1962
Baroni et al. ,
1963
Kanisawa &
Schroeder, 1967
Knoth, 1966/67
Schrauzer &
Ishmael, 1974
Fairhall &
Miller 1941
Hueper & Payne,
1962
Byron et al . ,
1967
Kanisawa &
Schroeder, 1969
Kroes et al. ,
1974
Remarks

Shortened life
span of treated
(aq. ethanol) vs.
Control

Shortened life
span, low dose
Significance cannot
be determined, un-
complete reporting
by author

Poor survival
in treated

Reduced survival
at highest dose
Low dose
High mortality and
2 tumors (incidence
not reported
observed in lead
                                                                                                                                            arsenate  group)
3
O>
i-D
CO
CO

-------
                                                                   TABLE 5-20.  (continued)
0 	 	
!~^ Route
j=
1X0 Oral
Inhalation
Intratracheal
instillation
Intratracheal
Instillation
tn Intratracheal
Co Instillation
0
Skin painting
(application)
Skin painting
(application)
Skin painting
(application)
Species (Strain)

Dog
Mice (not specified)
Rats (Wistar King)
male
Rats (Wistar King)
male
Rats (BDIX)
Mice (not specified)
Mice (S)
Mice (Rockland
all-purpose)
Compound
NaAsO, or
Na3As64
NaAs02
(1) As20,
(2) Copper ore
(3.95%
Arsenic)
(3) Flue dust
As203
Ca3(As04)2
KAsO? and
As2°3
KAs02
followed by
croton oil
in acetone
(1) KAs02
followed by
croton oil in
benzene
Vehicle Results*

Diet
Aqueous aerosol
Not specified
Aqueous
solution
Bordeaux +
mixture
(contains
CuS04 & Ca(OH)2)
Ethanol
Methanol
80% ethanol
Reference

Byron et al . ,
1967
Berteau et al . ,
1978
Ishinishi et al . ,
1977
Ishinishi et
al., 1976
Ivankovic et
al . , 1979
Leitch &
Kennaway 1922
Salaman &
Roe 1956
Boutwell, 1963
Remarks

Weight loss, early
mortality, short
duration of experi-
ment
Reported in an
abstract form, high
incidence in controls
One tumor observed
in treated, not sig-
nificant
One tumor observed
in treated, not sig-
nificant
Results cannot be
attributed to arsenic
alone
Neubauer (1947)
failed to confirm
this observation
As reviewed by
IARC (Vo. 23, 1980)
As reviewed by
IARC (Vol. 23, 1980)
UD
co
CO

-------
TABLE 5-20.   (continued)
013AS2/A





<_n
i
CO






C_i
c
3
0>
to
00
GO
Route

Skin painting
(application)
Skin painting
(application)


S.C. injection
Subcutaneous
implant
Subcutaneous
injection
i.v. injections
Intramuscullary
injection
Intramuscullary
injection
Oral

Oral

Species (Strain)

Mice (Rockland
all-purpose)
Mice (Swiss)


Mice (Swiss) female
Progeny
Rats (random-bred)
male albino
Rats (random-bred)
male albino
Mice (Swiss)
female
Rats (Osborne-Mendel)
Rabbits
Mice (Swiss)

Mice (STS)

Compound
(2) OMB A
followed by
KAs02 in 80%
ethanol
(1) Na3As04
(2) Na3As04
followed by
croton oil
and DMBA
Na AsO
Na^AsO*
Ca3(As04)2
Ca3(As04)2
Na3As04
Arsenic
Arsenic
As20 &
croton oil
OMBA or urethan
Arsanilic acid
or KAsO? followed
by DMBA (skin)
then croton oil
(skin) in benzene
Vehicle Results*

acetone Not carcino-
genic
Water containing
Tween 60
Water con- No promotional
tainig activity
Tween 60 observed

Water +
Water +
Paraffin
pellets
Sunflower oil
Water +
Metallic
Metallic
Drinking water

Diet

Reference Remarks

Boutwell , 1963
Baroni et al . ,
1963


Osswald & Goerttler,
1971
Arkhipov, 1968 As reviewed by
I ARC (Vol. 23, 1980)
Arkhipov, 1968
Osswald &
Goerttler, 1971
Hueper, 1954
Hueper, 1954
Baroni et al . ,
1963

Boutwell, 1963 As reviewed by
I ARC (Vol. 23, 1980)

(*) + statistically significant excess tumors observed over controls
- no statistically significant excess tumors of treated vs. control or no tumors observed






-------
been discussed in the text,  but have been presented in Table 5-20.   Studies  on
other animal models  have  generally  resulted in negative findings.  A few of
these are discussed  below,  but most have also been summarized in Table  5-20.
     In a study  by Baroni et al. (1963), Swiss mice were given either arsenic
trioxide dissolved in  drinking water (concentration of 100 mg/£) ad libitum
for the duration  of  the 70-week experiment; or,  sodium arsenate in a concen-
tration of  15.8  gm/£ in a 2.5 percent solution of Tween 60 in water, applied
twice weekly for  the duration of the experiment.   Each  compound was tested
alone, in combination with skin applications of croton oil  (to test for initi-
ating  action),  and  after initiation with  a single  skin  application  of
7,12-dimethylbenz(a) anthracene  or  with  administration of urethan by stomach
tube  (to test  for promoting action).  All  tests  failed to  show  any  carcino-
genic activity of the  two compounds under the given experimental conditions.
      Kanisawa  and Schroeder (1969)  treated  Swiss  mice with sodium arsenite
(equivalent to 5 pg/ml As)  in  drinking  water for the 30-month  duration of
their study.  In  the treated animals, the authors noted 6 malignant and 11 com-
bined malignant  and  benign  tumors out of 103 animals  versus 15 malignant and
50  combined malignant  and benign tumors  out of 170 control  animals;  thus, the
results were  negative  for showing any carcinogenic effect of sodium arsenite
in  this study.
      In a  study  of Leitch and Kennaway  (1922; as  reported  in IARC,  1980), 100
mice  were   given  skin  applications  of a solution of  potassium arsenite in
ethanol containing 1.8 percent arsenic trioxide (later reduced to 0.12  percent
due to  a  high death rate), thrice  weekly for 3  months.   Of the 33 mice that
lived for 3 months,  only  one  developed a metastasizing squamous  cell carcinoma.
      In  certain   animal  systems, positive carcinogenic responses  have  been
reported, however.   For example, Osswald and Goerttler (1971) exposed pregnant


013AS2/A                              5-82                             June  1983

-------
Swiss mice to daily parenteral dosing of sodium arsenate (0.5 mg/kg, solution
of 0.005 percent  arsenale  salt)  for a total  of  20 injections.   Part of the
offspring groups  received  20  injections  of the same level subcutaneously at
weekly intervals.  Leukemia or lymphoma was seen in 46 percent of the mothers
(11/24) at the  end  of 2 years versus none  in the  controls.   Of the treated
offspring,  41  percent (17/41) of  the males and about half  of  the  females
(24/50) developed leukemia  versus  only  3 of  55 male and female control off-
spring (approximately 6  percent).   IARC  (1973) has criticized this  study for
the  absence  of exposure of controls to the  appropriate  vehicle  solution.
     Knoth (1966) noted  significant  frequency of tumors in 30 mice  exposed  to
Fowler's solution orally (one  drop/week,  20  weeks, approximately 5.3  mg As
total),including adenocarcinomas of  the skin,  lung, and lymph nodes.  The ab-
sence of experimental  details makes critical assessment of this study difficult.
     Some recent  animal  studies  have employed different exposure conditions
than have been  employed  in the past.  Berteau et  al.  (1978) have exposed a
tumor-susceptible strain of  female mice  to a  respirable aerosol of inorganic
arsenic (1 percent aqueous  solution  of sodium meta-arsenite, 20 to  40 minutes
daily, 5 days/week,  55 weeks total).   The 30 exposed mice showed neither gross
nor histological evidence of neoplasia.
     In a two-part  study,  Ishinishi  et  al. (1977)  examined  the carcinogenic
and co-carcinogenic effects  of  various  arsenic compounds on male Wistar-King
rats.  In the first part of the study, arsenic trioxide, an arsenic-containing
copper ore  (containing  3.95  percent arsenic) or  metal  refinery  flue dust
(containing 10.5  percent arsenic)  were  administered to 51 rats via 15 weekly
intratracheal instillations.  The  rats were observed over their lifespan.   Of
the 25 surviving rats, one  adenocarcinoma was  seen  in the group receiving flue
dust.  One lung metastasis  from osteosarcoma  of the femur and one adenoma was


013AS2/A                             5-83                             June 1983

-------
reported in the  group  exposed to the copper ore.   No  malignant tumors were
reported in the  group  receiving  arsenic trioxide; however, one  adenoma was
reported for this group.   All  groups displayed  squamous cell  metaplasia in the
airway and osteometaplasia in  the alveolus of the lung.
     In the second part of the study, 87 rats were instilled with each  of the
above compounds  suspended in a  saline solution  containing  benzo[a]pyrene
(B[a]P) or  with B[a]P, alone.   Control  rats (23) were  instilled with the
saline solution.  Of the  34  surviving exposed rats, one adenocarcinoma was
seen in the group  receiving  B[a]P plus copper ore.  All exposed groups had
squamous cell  carcinomas  of the  lung.  Of particular interest to the authors,
was the noted co-carcinogenic effect of arsenic  trioxide with B[a]P;  rats in
this group  exhibited a 43 percent incidence rate (3/7)  for  squamous  cell
carcinomas.   This compared with  a 14 percent (1/7) incidence rate in  animals
given B[a]P, alone.  No benign or  malignant tumors were  seen  in the 7  surviv-
ing control rats.   Again, squamous cell metaplasia or osteometaplasia were
seen in all  groups.
     The results indicated a  positive interaction between arsenic trioxide and
B[a]P; however,  the  authors  noted that the numbers of surviving animals were
too small  to permit drawing any firm conclusions  from the study.
     In another  study  (1980), Ishinishi et  al. gave 30 male adult Wistar  rats
intratracheal  instillations of arsenic  trioxide  in suspension  for 15  weeks.
Of the  19  rats  that survived, only one malignant squamous cell  carcinoma was
observed over lifetime.  No tumors were found in  the controls.
     Ivankovic and co-workers (1979) exposed rats, via intratracheal  instilla-
tion, to  a  pesticide mixture  corresponding  to that used  in the  past for vine-
yard treatment  and  consisting of a mixture of copper  (II) sulfate,  calcium
hydroxide and calcium arsenate.   Of 25 rats exposed to ca. 0.07 mg arsenic, 10


013AS2/A                             5-84                             June 1983

-------
died from lung necrosis or pneumonia.   In the survivors,  9 animals (60 percent)
showed multi-focal bronchogenic adenocarcinomas and bronchiolar/alveolar cell
carcinomas.
     This study  appears to  offer  experimental  evidence  that  the vineyard
pesticide mixture,  employed as such, could  have  been carcinogenic to vine
dressers working  with  the material.   One difficulty  with this study is an
ambiguity regarding its  full  significance for the general  issue  of arsenic
inducing carcinogenic effects by itself.   Clearly, the high mortality rate, 40
percent, and the known toxicity of Bordeau mixture (copper sulfate plus calcium
hydroxide)  to  animals  (Pimentel and Marques, 1969)  and  man (Villar, 1974,
Pimentel and Marques,  1969)  suggest carcinogenesis; however, it is  impossible
to clearly  ascribe such  activity to arsenic  alone given the presence  of other
compounds within  the mixture.   In their studies,  Ivankovic et al. (1979) did
not  include animal  groups exposed to calcium arsenate  alone  or to Bordeau
mixture alone.
     Recently, both Inamasu  et al.  (1982) and Pershagen  et al.  (1982) have
studied  the effects  of intratracheal instillation of calcium  arsenate (see
Section 4.1.1  for complete discussion).   Inamasu et  al.  gave  single intra-
tracheal instillations  of  arsenic trioxide or calcium arsenate to  male Wistar
rats.  Pershagen et al. instilled male Syrian golden  hamsters with four weekly
suspensions of arsenic trioxide, arsenic trisulfide and calcium arsenate.  The
results of  both  studies  showed that  arsenic  trioxide  was  rapidly  cleared from
the lungs, whereas calcium arsenate was slowly eliminated.  The differences in
clearance appeared to  be  related to  solubility, with  the  less  soluble calcium
arsenate exhibiting the slowest clearance.
     These  recent  findings  might  help to explain the differences noted above
in the  earlier studies of Ishinishi  et al.  (1977; 1980) and Ivankovic et al.


013AS2/A                             5-85                             June 1983

-------
(1979).   In regard to the Ivankovic study, it may be that the calcium arsenate,
of  itself,  contributed  to the high mortality  rate  observed  in the exposed
rats.
     Schrauzer and co-workers (Schrauzer  and Ishmael, 1974; Schrauzer et a!.,
1977;  Schrauzer et al. ,  1978) have reported experimental results using oral
arsenic and the tumorigenic effect of the agent on spontaneous mammary adeno-
carcinomas in an  inbred  strain  of mice (C3H/St Mice).   These workers noted
that while arsenic retards the overall incidence of  tumor formation (10 or 80
ppm As),  it stimulates the growth of tumors that otherwise occur.  When these
animals were exposed  to  only  2  ppm As (arsenite) in drinking water,  compared
to levels of 10 or 80 ppm, there was no effect on frequency of tumors, although
the same  enhanced tumor growth was seen as before with levels of 10 or 80 ppm
As  (Schrauzer  et  al. , 1978).   Furthermore,  a  higher incidence of multiple
tumors of  the mammary  gland  was observed, as was the abolishing of the anti-
carcinogenic effect of  selenium  in this system when both elements were given
together.
5.2.1.4  Quantitative Carcinogen Risk Estimates
5.2.1.4.1  Introduction.   This quantitative section deals with the unit risk for
arsenic in air and water and the potency of arsenic relative to other carcino-
gens that the Carcinogen Assessment Group (CAG) of the U.S.  Environmental  Pro-
tection Agency has evaluated.  The unit risk estimate for an  air pollutant  is
defined as the  lifetime  cancer  risk occurring in  a  population in which all
individuals are exposed continuously from birth throughout their lifetimes  to
                         o
a concentration of 1 (jg/m  of the agent in the air they breathe.   The unit risk
estimate for water is defined similarly, but with a water concentration of 1
Unit risk  estimates are used  for two purposes:  (1)  to compare several agents
with each  other in  terms  of carcinogenic potency,  and  (2)  to give a crude
013AS2/A                             5-86                             June 1983

-------
indication of the human health risks that might be associated with exposure to
these agents, if the actual exposures are known.
     The data  used  for  quantitative  estimates  can  be  of  two  types:   (1)  life-
time animal  studies,  and  (2) human  studies where  cancer risk  has  been asso-
ciated with  exposure  to the agent.  It is assumed, unless evidence exists to
the contrary,  that  if a carcinogenic response occurs at the dose levels used
in a study,  then responses at all  lower  doses will  occur with an incidence
that can be determined by an appropriate extrapolation model.
     There  is  no solid scientific basis  for  any mathematical  extrapolation
model that  relates  carcinogen exposure to cancer  risks  at the extremely low
concentrations which  must  be dealt with in evaluating environmental hazards.
For practical  reasons,  such low levels of risk cannot be measured directly
either by animal  experiments or by  epidemiologic  studies.   It is  necessary,
therefore, to  depend  on current  knowledge of the mechanisms  of carcinogenesis
for guidance as to the correct risk model to use.
     At the present time,  the dominant view is that most cancer-causing agents
also cause irreversible damage to DNA--a position supported by the fact that a
large proportion  of  agents that cause cancer  are  also mutagenic.   There is
reason to expect that the  quanta!  type of biological  response, which  is  char-
acteristic  of  mutagenesis, is associated with  a  linear  non-threshold dose-
response relationship.  Indeed, there is substantial  evidence from mutagenesis
studies with both ionizing radiation and a wide variety of chemicals that this
type of dose-response model is the appropriate one to use in estimating cancer
risks from  environmental  exposures.   This is particularly true at the lower
end of  the  dose-response  curve.   At higher  doses, there can  be  an upward
curvature, probably  reflecting the  effects  of multistage processes on  the
mutagenic response.    The  linear  non-threshold dose-response relationship is

013AS6/A                             5-87                        June 1983

-------
also consistent with the  relatively  few epidemiologic studies of cancer re-
sponses to specific agents that contain enough information to make the evalu-
ation possible (e.g.,  radiation-induced  leukemia,  breast and thyroid cancer,
skin cancer  induced  by arsenic in drinking water,  liver cancer induced by
aflatoxins in the diet).  There is also some evidence from animal experiments
that is consistent with  the  linear non-threshold model  (e.g.,  the initiation
stage of  the two-stage carcinogenesis model in  rat  liver and mouse skin).
     Because its  scientific basis, although limited,  is  the best of any of  the
current mathematical  extrapolation models, the linear non-threshold model has
been adopted here as  the primary basis for risk extrapolation at low levels of
exposure.
     The quantitative  aspect of  carcinogen risk assessment is included here
because it may be of use in setting  regulatory  priorities,  evaluating the
adequacy  of  technology-based controls,  and other aspects  of  the regulatory
decision-making  process.  However, the  imprecision  of presently available
technology for estimating cancer  risks  to humans at  low levels  of exposure
should  be  recognized.   At best,  the linear extrapolation model  used here
provides a rough  but plausible estimate of the upper limit of risk—that is,
with this model  it  is  not likely that the true  risk would be much more than
the estimated risk,  but  it could be  considerably lower.   The risk estimates
presented below should  not be regarded,  therefore, as accurate representations
of true cancer risks even when the exposures involved are  accurately  defined.
The estimates presented may,  however, be factored into regulatory decisions to
the extent that the concept of  upper-risk limits is found to be useful.
013AS6/A                             5-88                        June 1983

-------
5.2.1.4.2   Unit Risk for Air
5.2.1.4.2.1  Methodology for quantitative risk estimates.   The  methodologies
used to  arrive  at  quantitative estimates of risk must  be  capable of being
implemented using  the data available  in existing  epidemiologic studies of
exposure to  airborne arsenic.    In  order to extrapolate from the exposure
levels and temporal exposure patterns in these studies to those  for which risk
estimates are required,  it  will  be assumed that the  age-specific mortality
rate of  respiratory cancer  per  year per 100,000 persons  for a particular
5-year age interval i can be represented using either of two models:

               a.(D) = a.[l + a'Dk]                                        (1)

(a relative or multiplicative risk model), or

               a.(D) = a. + 100,OOOa'Dk                                    (2)

(an  absolute  or additive risk model).   With either model, a-  is the age-
specific mortality rate per year of respiratory cancer in a control population
not  exposed to  arsenic,  a1  is  a parameter representing the potential of air-
borne arsenic to cause  respiratory cancer,  and D is  some  measure  of  the ex-
posure to arsenic  up to the ith age  interval.   For example,  D  might be the
cumulative dose in ug/m3 years, the cumulative dose neglecting exposure during
the  last 10 years  prior  to  the ith age  interval, or the average dose  in ug/m3
over some time period prior to  the ith age interval.   The forms  to be used for
D will be constrained by the manner  in  which dose was treated  in  each indi-
vidual  epidemiologic  study.   The  parameter  k determines  the shape  of the
013AS6/A                             5-89                        June 1983

-------
dose-response curve.   Attention will  be given particularly to the values k = 1

and k = 2.   If k = 1, the age-specific incidence rates vary  linearly with the

dose level  (a  linear  model),  and if k =  2 they vary quadratically.   At low

exposures  the extra lifetime probability of respiratory cancer mortality will

vary correspondingly  (e.g., linearly  for  k = 1 and quadratically for k = 2).

     The dose-response data available  in  the epidemiologic studies for esti-

mating the  parameters in these models consists primarily  of  a dose measure D.
                                                                            J
for the jth exposure  group,  the person-years of observation Y-,  the observed
                                                              J
number of respiratory cancer  deaths  0.,  and the number  E. of these deaths
                                      J                   J
expected in a control  population with the same sex  and age distribution as the
exposure group.   The expected  number E. is calculated as
                                      J
           j =   Y...a./100,000,                                            (3)
where Y-. is the number of person-years of observation in the ith age category
and the  jth  exposure group  (Y- =  ,-Y-.)-  This  is actually a  simplified  repre-
sentation, because the  calculation  also takes account of the change in the
age-specific  incidence  rates with  absolute  time.   The  expected number of
respiratory cancer deaths for the ith exposure group is
     E(0.) = * Yj.a^l + a'D.jk)/100,000
                    a'D.k)                                                 (4)
                       J
013AS6/A                             5-90                        June 1983

-------
under the relative risk model, and is
          E(0.) = * Y..(a. +100,OOOa'D-k)/100,000
                = Ej * a'YjDjk                                             (5)
under the absolute risk model.  Consequently, with either model,  E(O-) can  be
                                                                    J

expressed in terms of  quantities  typically available from the published epi-


demiologic studies.   Note that person-years of observation are not required if


the multiplicative model  is used.


     Making the  reasonable assumption that 0. has a  Poisson  distribution, the
                                            J

parameters a1  and k can be estimated from the above equations using the method


of maximum  likelihood.  Once  these parameters are estimated,  the  age-specific


mortality rates  for  respiratory cancer  can be estimated for any  desired ex-


posure pattern.


     To estimate the corresponding additional  lifetime probability of respira-


tory cancer mortality, let b-,,..., b-,g  be the mortality rates,  in the absence


of exposure, for all cases per  year per 100,000 persons for  the age intervals


0-4, 5-9,...,  80-84, and  85+,  respectively;  let  a-,,...,a-,o represent the


corresponding  rates  for  malignant neoplasms  of the  respiratory system.  The


probability of  survival  to the beginning of the  ith 5-year age  interval is


estimated as
           FI  [1 - 5b 7100,000].                                      (6)
                     J
013AS6/A                             5-91                        June 1983

-------
Given survival to the beginning of age interval  i,  the probability of dying of

respiratory cancer during this 5-year interval  is estimated as




     53^100,000.                                                     (7)



     The probability of  dying of respiratory cancer given survival to age 85

is estimated  as  a-,g/b-,g.   Therefore,  the probability of dying of respiratory

cancer in the absence of exposure to arsenic is  estimated as
17             i-1
                  (1 - 5b. /100,000)]
                                                                 (8)
     Pn = I [5a. /100,000) FI (1 - 5b. /100,000)]
          i=l  X         j=l       J
               17
     +(a18/blg) n (i - 5/100,000)
                =l       J
Here the  mortality  rates a- apply to  the  target population for which  risk

estimates  are  desired,  and  consequently will  be  different from those  in

(l)-(5),  which  applied to the epidemiologic  study  cohort.   If  the  1976  U.S.

mortality  rates (male, female, white, and non-white combined) are used in this

expression, then P~ =  0.0451.

     To  estimate  the  probability  P™  of respiratory cancer mortality  when

exposed  to a  particular exposure pattern  EP,  the  formula (8)  is  again  used,

but  a.  and b-  are replaced  by  a-(D-)  and b.(D-), where  D.  is  the  exposure

measure  calculated for the  ith age interval from the exposure pattern EP.  For

example,  if the dose  measure used in  (1)  is  cumulative dose to the beginning

of  the  ith age interval  in ug/m3-years, and  the  exposure  pattern  EP is a

lifetime  exposure  to a constant level  of  10  ug/m3, then D. =  (i-l)(5)(10),





013AS6/A                            5-92                        June 1983

-------
where the  5  accounts  for the fact that  each  age inverval has a width of 5
years.  The  additional  risk of respiratory cancer mortality  is estimated as
          PEP - PO.                                                        (9)
If the  exposure  pattern EP is constant  exposure  to pg/m3,  then P™ - PQ is
called the "unit risk."
     This approach can easily be modified to estimate the extra probability of
respiratory cancer mortality by a particular age due to any specified exposure
pattern.   It  is also  clear  that the applications  of the  approach are not
limited to respiratory cancer.
5.2.1.4.2.2.  Risk estimates  from epidemiologic studies.  Prospective  studies
of the  relationship  between  mortality and exposure  to  airborne arsenic  have
been  conducted  for the Anaconda, Montana  smelter (Lee  and Fraumeni,  1969;
Lee-Feldstein, 1982;  Higgins  et  al., 1982; Brown and Chu, 1983 a, b, c); and
the  Tacoma,  Washington smelter  (Pinto  et al., 1977; Enterline  and Marsh,
1982).
     The study of  Lee-Feldstein  (1981)  reported on an additional  14 years of
follow-up of  the  cohort of 8047 studied by Lee and Fraumeni (1969), and used
essentially the  same  methods  of analysis as the earlier study.  Therefore it
will  not be necessary to  consider the Lee  and  Fraumeni  study  in any  detail  in
this  report.  Higgins  et  al.  (1982) followed  for an additional  14 years  a
sample  of  1800  men from  the  cohort  studied by Lee  and Fraumeni,  but used
different exposure classifications and different methods of analysis.
     Brown and Chu  (1983  a,  b, c),  in a series of  papers,  arranged  the  Ana-
conda smelter data in such a manner that a mathematical  model  could be derived
from  it to  account  for the effect of the  timing  of exposure as predicted  by
the multistage model.
013AS6/A                             5-93                        June 1983

-------
     Whereas Pinto et  al.  (1977)  studied a cohort  from  the Tacoma smelter
consisting of 527 followed  only  after retirement,  the study by Enter!ine and
Marsh (1982) involved  2802  men  and included follow-up prior  to  retirement.
Consequently, the  Enterline and Marsh study appears  to  provide a stronger
basis for quantitative risk assessment than the Pinto et al. study.
     In addition to  studies of  copper smelter workers, there  have also  been
studies of workers exposed  to arsenicals in the production or use of pesti-
cides.   Ott  et al. (1974) studied the mortality experience  of  workers exposed
to lead arsenate and calcium arsenate.
5.2.1.4.2.3  The Lee-Feldstein (1982) study.   This  study  included 8047 white
males who were employed  as  smelter workers  for 12 months  or more  before  1957,
and whose mortality  experience  was observed from 1938  through 1977.   Alto-
gether, the  study  involved  192,476 person-years of  follow-up  and  3550 deaths,
including 302  from  respiratory  cancer  (Table 5-21).   Expected numbers of
cancer  deaths  were  calculated on  an  age-adjusted  basis  using the combined
mortality experience of the  white male population  of  Idaho, Wyoming,   and
Montana.  As Table  5-21 indicates, malignant  neoplasms  of  the digestive and
respiratory  tracts  had SMRs of 125 and 285, respectively,  both of which were
significant  at the 1%  level (SMR = [observed/expected][100]).
     Workers were  categorized both by  duration  of employment and level  of
exposure  to  airborne arsenic  in order to determine  the  effect of these  param-
eters  upon  mortality.   For each year of  the  study period, workers were as-
signed  to one of five  groups  on the basis  of total years  of smelter employment
completed  (Table  5-22).   Work areas in the smelter were divided into heavy,
medium,  or  light  exposure  areas.   Based  upon this division, workers were
categorized  into  heavy, medium, or light  exposure  groups,  as determined  by
their  maximum  exposure for 12  or  more  months.  The  results  for  respiratory
cancer  based upon  these  categorizations  are given  in  Table  5-23.
013AS6/A                              5-94                         June 1983

-------
       TABLE 5-21.   OBSERVED AND EXPECTED DEATHS DUE TO SELECTED CAUSES,
                   WITH STANDARDIZED MORTALITY RATIOS (SMRs)
                        AMONG SMELTER WORKERS, 1938-77
                                      Number of deaths
Cause of Death List No.a Observed Expected
Tuberculosis
Respiratory
Other
Malignant neoplasms
Digestive
Respiratory
Other 140-148,
177-181,
Vascular lesions of
central nervous
system
Diseases of heart
Influenza and pneumonia

Emphysema (1963-77 only)
Cirrhosis of liver
Accidents
Motor vehicle 810-825,
Other 800-802,
001-019
001-008
010-019
140-199
150-159,
160-164°
165-170
190-199
330-334


400-443
480-483,
490-493
527
581
800-962
830-835
840-862
Suicide and homicide 963-964, 970-979

All other causes
Total
980-985
Residual

aSeventh revision of International Lists
53
47
6
609
167
302
140

262


1366
88

90
76
288
106
182
83

606e
3522
of Diseases
27.93
25.51
2.42
370.74
133.58
105.81
131.35

211.56


1056.55
76.05

34.58
36.53
280.27
115.55
164.72
86.08

548.50
2728.79
and Causes
SMRb
190°
184C
248
164^
125^
285C
107

124C


129C
116

260C
208C
103
92
110
98


129C
of Death.
 SMR = (observed/expected) x 100.

Significant at 1% level.  Bailar and Ederer (1964)

 Among the 302 deaths from respiratory cancer, the site was lung and
 bronchus (162,163) in 289 cases,  larynx (163) in 9, mediastinum (164)
 in 3 and (160) in 1.

 Includes 19 emphysema deaths occurring in the years preceding 1963, for which
 emphysema death rates are not available from individual states.

Source:   Lee-Feldstein (1982).
013AS6/A
5-95
June 1983

-------
TABLE 5-22.   DESCRIPTION OF LENGTH OF EMPLOYMENT GROUPS,  WITH NUMBERS OF  SMELTER
                     WORKERS,  NUMBERS  OF  DEATHS, PERSON-YEARS AT  RISK,  AND
                       DURATION OF SMELTER EMPLOYMENT (BASED ON TOTAL
                            WORK EXPERIENCE THROUGH  SEPT.  30, 1977)
Length of
employment group
1 (25 or more years)
2 (15 to 24 years)
3 (10 to 14 years)
4 (5 to 9 years)
5 (1 to 4 years)
TOTAL
Number of.
persons
1899
1138
678
1082
3248
SW5
Number of
deaths
1169
586
328
433
1006
3527
Number of
person-years
of follow up
27,053
26,556
19,734
30,854
88,279
192,476
 Employees in all cohorts were living on Jan.  1, 1938.

 Group assignment of each person here was based on his status at the
termination of employment or on September 30,  1977 (whichever date was
earlier).

 Represents cumulative  follow-up  experience  over the study  period, 1938-77,
with a total of 67,569 person-years of follow-up in the period 1964-77.
Individuals were  initially  counted at risk upon completing 1 year of employ-
ment or  on  Jan.  1, 1938, if  employed  at  least  a  full year before  that date.
In each calendar year of the study period, employees were counted in the group
reflecting their cumulative work experience to date.

Source:  Lee-Feldstein (1982).
 013AS6/A
5-96
June 1983

-------
     TABLE 5-23.   OBSERVED AND EXPECTED DEATHS FROM RESPIRATORY CANCER,
                      WITH PERSON-YEARS OF FOLLOW-UP, BY COHORT AND
                               DEGREE OF ARSENIC EXPOSURE
                              Maximum Exposure to Arsenic (12 or more months)'
                        Heavy
Years of Exposure   Obs/Exp   P-Y

25 years+           13/2.5    2400
15-24               9/1.3     2629
Less than 15 years  11/2.4    6520
      Medium
                                        Obs/Exp   P-Y

                                        49/7      6837
                                        13/4.0    6509
                                        31/9.3   24594
                                                                Light
                       Obs/Exp   P-Y

                       51/16.3   14573
                       16/8.6    12520
                       69/31     78245
 The 1562 men  who  worked less than  12  months  in their category  of  maximum
arsenic exposure were not included in this table.

 Observed/Expected.
£
 Person-years  of follow-up  furnished by Dr. Lee-Feldstein (personal communi
cation).

Source:  Adapted from Lee-Feldstein (1982).
013AS6/A
5-97
                                                                 June 1983

-------
     Exposures to airborne arsenic  were estimated from 702 samples collected
at 56 sampling  stations  during the years 1943-1958  (Morris,  1975).   Morris
estimated that airborne  levels  averaged 11.27,  0.58, and  0.27  mg/m3  in the
heavy, medium, and light exposure areas, respectively.  Respirators were used
with varying degrees  of faithfulness in the high exposure  areas; consequently,
average individual  exposures  in these areas were probably  much less than 11.27
mg/m3.  A  rough estimate  is  that  use of respirators  reduces  the exposure
levels by a factor of 10 (OSHA, 1978).
     The Lee-Feldstein (1982)  study has a number of features which support its
use in making quantitative estimates of  respiratory  cancer  risk from airborne
arsenic.  It was  aOarge  study that  involved observations  of a considerable
number of respiratory  cancer  deaths.   A substantial amount of follow-up was
conducted of persons who had been exposed for 15 years or more.   Estimates  of
exposure levels  and  work histories are  available  for  estimating  individual
exposures and for determining  dose  response.
     It would have been more appropriate for making  quantitative  estimates  of
risk to have  categorized workers  by their individual  cumulative  or average
exposures,  rather than by  their maximum exposures  for 1  year or more.  In
developing the  quantitative  estimates,  it will  be assumed that  a worker's
average exposure during work hours was  equal to  the  exposure  for  the category
to which he was  assigned.  However,  because these  assignments were based upon
maximum exposures  for at  least a  12-month period,  this  approach tends to
overestimate exposures, and consequently,  to  underestimate the carcinogenic
potency of arsenic.
013AS6/A                             5-98                        June 1983

-------
     Because smoking is also an important risk factor for respiratory cancer,
it would have been  very useful  to have smoking  histories  for the workers.
Higgins et  al.  (1982)  collected  some limited smoking data  for  this cohort.
Higgins suggest that the smelter workers smoked somewhat more than the average
U.S.  white  male population, but the difference was not enough to  have a major
effect upon the outcome of the study.
     Development of risk estimates:   The  data  from the Lee-Feldstein (1982)
study used  in the risk assessment are listed in Table 5-24.   The relative risk
(observed/expected) from this table  are graphed in Figure 5-2,  and the abso-
lute risks  ([observed-expected/ person-years) in Figure 5-3.  It is clear from
these graphs  that  the  risk for the high-exposure  group  exposed for greater
than 25 years  is  not commensurate with the  risks  for the other groups.  Be-
cause of this,  and  also because the exposures  in the high exposure  groups  are
much more uncertain than those of the other groups, it was decided to estimate
risk  using  only the  low  and medium exposure  groups.   Results  of applying
chi-square  goodness-of-fit tests of the relative and absolute risk models with
k =  1 and  k = 2 are recorded  in Table  5-25.  The maximum  likelihood estimates
of the  carcinogenic potency parameter a1  are also listed in this table.  The
maximum likelihood  fits of these models  are graphed in  Figures 5-2 and 5-3.
All  of  the  fits are poor  (p less than 0.0001) with the exception of that for
the  absolute-risk model; this latter fit  is marginally acceptable (p = 0.025).
     The unit risk  (additional  risk of respiratory cancer death from lifetime
exposure to 1 (jg/m3 airborne arsenic) obtained from the  absolute-risk  model
with  k  = 1  is also  listed  in  Table 5-25.  This  risk was  estimated by applying
(2), (8), and (9) with  D-  based upon a constant exposure of 1 ug/m3.
013AS6/A                             5-99                        June 1983

-------
TABLE 5-24.   DOSE-RESPONSE DATA FROM LEE-FELDSTEIN (1982) USED FOR RISK ASSESSMENT

Cohort
1
(25 + years
(of exposure)
2
(15-25
years of
exposure)
3
(less than
15 years of
exposure)
Maximum
Exposure
to Arsenic
Heavy
Medium
Light

Heavy
Medium
Light

Heavy
Medium
Light
Cumulative
Exposure
(ug/m3-years)
36064
18560
9280

22250
11600
5800

5973
3074
Person-Years
of .
Observation
2400
6837
14573

2629
6509
12520

6520
24594

Observed
Deaths
13
49
51

9
13
16

11
31

Expected
Deaths
2.5
7.0
16.3

1.3
4.0
8.6

2.4
9.3
 Exposures are in ug/m3-years estimated as (air concentration)(duration).
 For light, medium, and heavy exposures, air concentration was estimated as
 290, 580, and 1127 ng/m3, respectively (OSHA, 1978).  Duration was estimated
 as follows (cf.  Table 5-22):

     Cohort 1: Persons in this cohort had at least 25 years' exposure.   If
               all had worked continuously throughout follow-up, average
               duration would have been 25 + 27053/1899 = 39 years.  There-
               fore the mid-point (39 + 25)/2 = 32 years was used.

     Cohort 2: The mid-point of the employed interval, i.e., (15 + 25)/2 = 20
               years was used.
     Cohort 3: A weighted average of the mid-points of the employment  intervals,
               i.e. ,
               (3) (88279)
               U -"""• --"+'-'-"-- -T--I- -linn -Ji
(7.5X30854) + (12.5)(19734) _
   88279 + 30854 + 19734
                                                                years.
 Furnished by Dr. Lee-Feldstein.
013AS6/A
        5-100
June 1983

-------
   12
  10-
    Q ^
S   6
0)
cc
    4-
          • Cohort 1

          O Cohort 2

          A Cohorts 3-5
                                                                  Dose-response data
                                                                  is from Table 5-24.
                                                                  Fit is by relative risk
                                                                model, heavy exposures
                                                                      omitted.
      0
  I
8000
   16000            24000

Cumulative Dose (yug/m3-years)
   I
32000
   r
40000
          Figure 5.2. Relative risks and 90% confidence limits for data of Lee-Feldstein (1982).
                                                     5-101
                                                                    June 1983

-------
    8-
           • - Cohort 1


           O~ Cohort 2


           A- Cohorts 3-5
    6-
                                k = 2
O
O
O
     4-
 o
 (A
     2-
                                                                       Dose-response data

                                                                       is from Table 5-24.

                                                                      Fit is by absolute risk

                                                                     model, heavy exposures

                                                                           omitted.
                         I

                      8000
      I                 I

   16000            24000

Cumulative Dose (Afg/m3- years)
32000
40000
            Figure 5-3. Absolute risks and 90% confidence limits for data of Lee-Feldstein (1982).
                                                    5-102
                                                    June  1983

-------
0
I—1
CO
oo
1— >
















en
i
j— J
o
CO






TABLE 5-25. SUMMARY OF QUANTITATIVE RISK ANALYSES

Exposed
Population
Anaconda
smelter
workers





ASARCO
smelter
workers








Dow pesticide
manufacture workers


Study and
Data Source
Lee-Feldstein
Table 5-24 (heavy
exposure omitted)

Higgins et al.
Table 5-24


Brown & Chu
Table 5-27

Enterline & Marsh
Table 5-21
(zero lag)

Enterline & Marsh
Table 1 (10-year
lag) 5-21

Ott et al.
Table 5-34 (high
exposure omitted)


Model
absolute risk

relative risk

absolute risk

relative risk

absolute risk


absolute risk

relative risk

absolute risk

relative risk

relative risk




k
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1


1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2

Results
Carcinogenic
Potency (a')a
2.48(-7)
2.09(-11)
3.00(-4)
2.09(-8)
2.36(-7)
1.74(-11)
3.17(-4)
2.18(-8)
9.45(-16)


6.04(-7)C
1 43(-10)
4i6(-4)
1.01(-7)
8.85(-7)
2 Ol(-lO)
5.13(-4)
1.06(-4)
9.2(-4)
1.58(-7)

of Goodness-of-Fit Test

x2 (d.f.)
12.7(5)
60(5)
28(5)
79(5)
1.2(3)
10.3(3)
2.57(3)
15.4(3)
7.01(7)


5.5(4)
20.7(4)
11.6(4)
23.4(4)
7.0(4)
26.1(4)
14.5(4)
28.9(4)
5.0(7)
9-4(7)


p-value
0.025
0.00001
0.00004
0.00001
0.75
0.017
0.46
0.0015
0.41


0.24
0.0003
0.02
0.00011
0.14
0.00003
0.006
0.00002
0.66
0.23

K
"unit" risk"
2.80(-3)
lack of fit.
lack of fix.
lack of fit
4.90(-3)
1.05(-4)
4.03(-3)
lack of fit
1.25(-3)


6.81(-3)
lack of fit
5.44(-3)
lack of fit
7.60(-3)
lack of fit
lack of fit
lack of fit
1.36(-2)
7.68(-4)

           Potencies  are in  different units,  depending  upon  model  used  (see  text),  and consequently are not comparable.

           Additional  lifetime risk of respiratory  cancer  mortality  from  lifetime environmental  exposure to 1 ug/m3 arsenic.

          c6.04(E-7)  means 6.04 x 10-7.

           p-value  of chi-square goodness-of-fit  test is less  than 0.01.
c
3
fD
CO
CO

-------
Specifically,
     D1 = 4.56[(i-l) + 2.5]                                                (10)
was used, which  represents  the cumulative exposure in ug/m3 resulting from a
constant exposure to  ug/m3  from birth to the mid-point of the ith 5-year age
interval.  The factor 4.56  is  needed  to  account for the  fact that  the workers
in the occupational  study used to estimate the carcinogenic potency of arsenic
were only exposed during work hours.   Assuming that workers were exposed for
an average of 8 hours per day, 240 days per year,  an environmental exposure to
1 ug/m3 for 1 year is equivalent to an occupational exposure to

      (1 ug/m3)(24 hours/8 hours)(365 days/240 days) = 4.56 ug/m3          (11)
for 1 year.

5.2.1.4.2.4   The Higgins et al. (1982) study.   Higgins  et  al.   conducted
additional independent follow-up through 1977 of a sample of 1800 men from the
Anaconda smelter  cohort  studied by Lee  and  Fraumeni  (1969).   The  sample in-
cluded  all  of the men classified  in  the heavy exposure category by Lee and
Fraumeni (1969),  as  well as a  random sample of 20% of the  remaining cohort.
There were  80 deaths  from respiratory cancer in the sample.   Expected numbers
were  based  upon  the  mortality  rates  of  Montana white males,  except for "all
respiratory diseases"; U.S. white  males  were the referenced population  for the
latter  category.
      Higgins  et  al.  also reviewed the industrial  hygiene data and  calculated
average concentrations   for  the period  1943-1965  for 18  departments.   No
measurements  were available  for  17  departments,  and  average  concentrations
were  estimated for  these.  These  estimates  were  coupled with work histories

013AS6/A                             5-104                       June 1983

-------
updated through 1978 to  obtain exposure measures for each individual in the
study.   Three types of individual  exposure measures  were considered:   ceiling,
time-weighted average  (TWA),  and cumulative.  Ceiling  exposures  were esti-
mates,  in ug/m3,  of  the  highest exposure a  man  experienced  for 30 days or
more.  TWA exposures were  estimates,  in units of ug/m3, of the time-weighted
average exposures  during the period of  employment.  Cumulative exposures were
estimates of total exposure in units of ug/m3-years.
     Higgins et al.  investigated  5 combinations of follow-up and time period
during which exposure was assessed:  I.  Exoosure was assessed up to the date a
worker entered the study and follow-up was from entry into the study through
1978;  II.   Exposure was assessed up to  1964 and follow-up was also  through
this date;  III.   Exposure was assessed through 1964 and follow-up was through
1978;  IV.   Exposure was assessed through 1964  and follow-up was from 1964
through 1978;  V.   Exposure was assessed through 1978 and follow-up was also
through 1978.  These different methods  were  considered  principally because  of
the  perceived  difficulties of  overlapping  exposure and follow-up periods.
Thus, with methods I  and IV,  exposure  and  follow-up  periods were disjoint,
whereas with methods II and V they coincided.
     The analyses based upon ceiling exposures are  not considered suitable for
quantitative risk assessment because it seems extremely unlikely that respira-
tory cancer  risk  would be  a function of peak exposures  for any 30-day period,
regardless of the other  exposures that might have  been experienced.   This is
also the  case with the TWA analyses, because the exposures were averaged only
over the  period  of employment, without regard to the duration of employment.
If either of these dose measures were appropriate,  it would mean, for example,
                         3
that exposure to 500 ug/m  for 1 month would produce the same risk as exposure
           3
to 500 ug/m  for 30 years—which seems highly unlikely.

013AS6/A                             5-105                       June 1983

-------
     Thus, the analyses of Higgins et al. which appear to be most appropriate

for developing quantitative estimates  are those based upon cumulative expo-

sure.   This  particular type of analysis  was  applied only to method  V  and

applied only  in Higgins (1982).  The results of this analysis for lung cancer

are listed in Table 5-26.
           TABLE 5-26.   RESPIRATORY CANCER MORTALITY 1938-1978 FROM
            CUMULATIVE EXPOSURE TO ARSENIC FOR 1800 MEN WORKING AT
                         THE ANACONDA COPPER SMELTER3
Cumulative
Exposure
|jg/m3-years
0-500.
(250)D
500-2000
(1250)
2000-12000
(7000)
2; 12000
(16000)
Person-Years
of Observation
13845.9
10713.0
11117.8
9015.5
Observed
Deaths
4
9
27**
40**
Expected
Deaths
5.8
5.7
6.8
7.3
aFrom Higgins (1982), Table 6.

 Numbers in parenthesis indicate assumed average exposures.

**
  Significant at 0.01 level.


     Information on  the  smoking habits of 80.6% of the 1800 men was obtained

from questionnaires  administered directely to those  still living and to close

friends  or  relatives of  those  who were deceased.   Sixteen  percent of the

smelter workers were "non-smokers"  compared with 24-36% of  U.S.  males from

1955 through  1978.   Thus it  appears that the smelter workers smoked somewhat

more than the average U.S. male.  However, no confounding was detected between
013AS6/A                             5-106                       June 1983

-------
arsenic exposure and  smoking;  15.1% of those in  the  "heavy"  exposure group
were  non-smokers,  versus 16.3%  in  the  other exposure groups.  Significant
increases in  respiratory cancer  were observed even among non-smokers exposed
to high levels of arsenic.
     Development of risk estimates:   The  relative risks  (observed/expected)
from Table  5-26 are graphed  in Figure 5-4, and the absolute risks  ([observed-
expected]/person-years)  in Figure 5-5.   Results of applying chi-square goodness-
of-fit tests  of  the  relative-  and absolute-risk  models with  k = 1 and  k = 2
are  recorded  in  Table 5-25.   The maximum  likelihood  estimates  of the  car-
cinogenic potency parameter  a'  are  also listed in Table  5-25.   The maximum
likelihood  fits of those models  are  graphed  in Figures 5-4 and 5-5.   The fits
for k = 1 are both excellent, with the absolute-risk model providing a slightly
better fit than the relative-risk model  (p = 0.75 vs.  p = 0.42).   The fits for
k = 2 are much less adequate (p = 0.017 for the absolute-risk model and p = 0.004
for the relative-risk model).
     The  unit risks  (defined as  the  additional  risk of  respiratory  cancer
death from  lifetime exposure to  1 ug/m3 airborne arsenic) obtained  from the
absolute- and relative-risk  models  with k = 1 are also listed in Table 5-25.
     These  risks were  estimated  by  applying (1) or (2),  (8),  and (9) with D.
based upon a  constant exposure of 1 pg/m3.   Specifically,

     Di = (4.56)(72)                                                   (12)

was used, which  represents  the average lifetime cumulative exposure in ug/m3
resulting from a constant exposure  to 1 ug/m3.   Average  lifetime exposure is
used  because  it  seems most commensurate with  the treatment  of exposure by
Higgins et  al.;  in their analysis all  of the person-years attributable to a

013AS6/A                             5-107                       June 1983

-------
7-
                                                    Dose-response data
                                                     is from Table 5-26.
                                                 Fit is by relative risk model.
                 4000            8000

                             Cumulative Dose
                              (jug/m3- years)
12000
16000
Figure 5-4. Relative risks and 90% confidence limits for data of Higgins (1982).
                                 5-108
                       June 1983

-------
                                                    Dose response data
                                                    is from Table 5 26
                                                     Fit is by absolute
                                                        risk model
                 4000            8000            12000           16000

                            Cumulative Dose
                              (/vg/m3- years)

Figure 55. Absolute risks and 90% confidence limits for data of Higgins (1982)
                                    5-109
June 1983

-------
single worker were  placed  into a single exposure  category  based upon total
lifetime exposure,  and  consequently  person-years of observation were placed
into exposure categories according to exposures which had not yet occurred.  It
would have been more appropriate  for purposes  of quantitative risk assessment
had exposures been  related  to each 5-year age  interval  (as was done in the
analysis of  Enterline and  Marsh,  1982) rather  than to the  total observation
period of an individual.  The  factor 4.56 converts from occupational to envi-
ronmental exposures and is  explained at equation (11).
5.2.1.4.2.5  The Brown and  Chu estimates from the Anaconda data.
Development of Risk Estimates.  As  noted  by Whittemore  (1977)  and Day and
Brown (1980), the  multi-stage theory for the  carcinogenic  process  predicts
that the carcinogenic response is a function of the following factors:
     (1)  exposure rate
     (2)  duration of exposure
     (3)  age at initial exposure
     (4)  time since cessation of exposure.
     Brown and Chu  (1983a)  discuss  in detail the ways in which these factors
influence the age-specific  carcinogenic rate at various  stages  of  the  car-
cinogenic process.
     Using the  updated  Anaconda  copper smelter workers  cohort originally
studied  by  Lee  and  Fraumeni  (1969)  and recently  extended  through  1977 by
Lee-Feldstein (1982), Brown  and  Chu  (1983b) concluded that airborne arsenic
most probably acted on a late stage of the carcinogenic process.  As a result,
they hypothesized that  the  carcinogenic risk  from arsenic  exposure  could be
quantified by assuming  a multistage model in which only the penultimate stage
is affected  by exposure.  Under this assumption, the risk may be expressed  in
the form

013AS6/A                             5-110                       June 1983

-------
               r(d, to) = C[(d) + t'   -t0                             (13)
where d is the duration of exposure, t  is the age at initial  exposure,  and C,
k are unknown parameters.  The parameter C depends upon the exposure rate, and
the parameter k upon the time effect of exposure.
     Brown and Chu (1983b)  noted a deviation from this model on the part  of
workers who  left  employment  at  the  copper smelter before  the  age of 55.   As a
result, the  mortality  experience of that  group after  leaving employment  was
not included in the analysis.
     In order to  estimate the  unknown  parameters  C and k,  the basic mortality
data were arranged in the three-way table  reproduced as Table 5-27.  The three
classifications used in this table are as  follows:

     (1)  Level  of exposure,  corresponding  to Lee  and Fraumeni  (1969)--
          classified into heavy, medium,  and light exposure groups;
     (2)  Duration  of  employment,  classified  into  the following  five  sub-
          groups;  0-9, 10-19, 20-29, 30-39, and 40+ years;
     (3)  Age at  initial  employment,  classified into  the  following five  sub-
          groups;  20, 20-29, 30-39, 40-49, and 50+ years.
     For  each  of  the 3 x 5 x 5 = 75 cells in  the table,  the  following  three
variables were given:
     Obs = observed number of respiratory cancer deaths;
     Exp = expected number of respiratory cancer deaths (based  upon the U.S.
           white  male age-specific  calendar-time-specific  respiratory cancer
           mortality rates); and
     Pyr = person-years  of observation.
     A  single  individual could supply  information for more than one  cell as
his  duration of  employment  increased  over the follow-up  period.   The person-
year weighted  average  duration of  employment, and age at  initial  employment,
were calculated for each cell.
013AS6/A                              5-111                       June 1983

-------
           TABLE 5-27.   OBSERVED AND EXPECTED LUNG CANCER DEATHS AND
        PERSON-YEARS BY LEVEL OF EXPOSURE,  DURATION OF EMPLOYMENT,  AND
                           AGE AT INITIAL EMPLOYMENT
Age at
Initial
Employment


0-9

Duration
10-19



of Employment (years)
20-29
30-39
40+
High Exposure Level Group
<20 Obs
Exp
Pyr
20-29 Obs
Exp
Pyr
30-39 Obs
Exp
Pyr
40-49 Obs
Exp
Pyr
50+ Obs
Exp
Pyr
Medium Exposure
<20 Obs
Exp
Pyr
20-29 Obs
Exp
Pyr
30-39 Obs
Exp
Pyr
40-49 Obs
Exp
Pyr
50+ Obs
Exp
Pyr
0
0.001
206
0
0.008
624
0
0.030
398
0
0.083
210
0
0.066
78.0
Level Group
0
0.010
1801
0
0.035
2636
0
0.167
1939
0
0.167
1190
1
0.262
295
0
0.009
408
0
0.051
637
0
0.077
207
0
0.054
80.0
0
0.027
23.2

0
0.039
1763
0
0.118
1622
0
0.473
1137
0
0.414
448
0
0.076
71.2
0
0.065
588
2
0.164
495
3
0.106
155
0
0.034
49.1
0
0.0
0.0

1
0.171
1500
2
0.331
1099
1
0.329
438
1
0.098
98.9
0
0.011
14.5
3
0.249
499
0
0.277
308
0
0.053
59.1
0
0.007
6.88
0
0.0
0.0

4
0.591
1206
4
0.717
951
3
0.161
194
3
0.010
12.1
0
0.0
0.0
0
0.193
172
2
0.082
64.4
0
0.001
0.86
0
0.0
0.0
0
0.0
0.0

1
0.597
579
7
0.514
654
0
0.045
68.2
0
0.0
0.0
0
0.0
0.0
013AS6/A
5-112
June 1983

-------
                             TABLE  5-27  (Continued)
Age at
Initial
Employment
Low Exposure Level
<20 Obs
Exp
Pyr
20-29 Obs
Exp
Pyr
30-39 Obs
Exp
Pyr
40-49 Obs
Exp
pyr
50+ Obs
Exp
Pyr

0-9
Group
0
0.056
8524
0
0.115
9951
0
0.390
5218
2
1.29
3703
3
1.62
1945
Duration
10-19

0
0.117
5249
0
0.334
4724
3
0.802
2218
1
1.18
1319
2
0.385
371
of Employment (years)
20-29

1
0.478
4038
2
0.892
2965
1
0.937
1364
1
0.344
386
0
0.041
65.4
30-39

1
1.59
3175
5
1.74
2117
0
0.662
715
1
0.035
52.7
0
0.0
0.0
40+

3
1.57
1376
6
0.796
834
1
0.062
74.6
0
0.001
2.00
0
0.0
0.0
Source:   Brown and Chu (1983a).

     Assuming that age  at  initial  exposure is equivalent to  age at initial
employment, and that duration of employment and exposure are equivalent,  Brown
and Chu  (1983c)  fitted  equation 13 to the data in Table 5-27.  They used the
maximum  likelihood method,  assuming  a binomial distribution where Obs is the
number of positive responses, Pyr is the sample size, and the rate of response
is p =  Exp/Pyr  + r(d,t ),  where d,t  are  the  averages  for  each  cell.  Using
this approach, the  value  for k is estimated  to  be 6.8, and c = .603, 1.42,
           -13
1.74, x  10    for the light, medium, and  heavy exposure categories,  respec-
tively.
013AS6/A
5-113
June 1983

-------
     Brown and  Chu  (1983c)  did not attempt to give an exposure rate estimate
to the  heavy,  medium,  and light exposure groups of Lee and Fraumeni,  (1969).
One reason for  this  was  that "heavy" and  "medium"  were defined as "having
worked at least one year in a heavy or medium exposure area."  The "total  time
worked" was  not necessarily an  indication  of the total  time worked  in a heavy
or medium exposure  area.   As  a result, the  use  of the exposure rate  in the
areas defined as  medium  or heavy would tend to overestimate the true  average
exposure over an  individual's  working history.  This bias did  not  exist for
those in the light exposure group, since almost all of  their working time was
spent in light exposure areas.   In addition, these low environmental exposures
are of greater utility in estimating risks.
     As a result  of  these factors, only the light exposure group was  used to
obtain a dose response model.   In  this group,  Brown and Chu (1983c) estimated
that the respiratory cancer rate for an individual  first exposed at age t  for
a duration of d years would be

     r(d,to)  = .603 x 10"13 [(d + to)5'8  - to5'8].                         (14)

     Only limited  information exists  concerning the time-weighted exposure of
workers in the  light exposure areas.  Arsenic  concentrations in  several light
exposure areas, as  given  in a NIOSH  criteria  document  (1975),  are shown in
Table 5-28.
     In the  absence  of  information to the  contrary,  it is assumed that the
person-hours  spent  in each  area are equal.  Thus  an  estimate  of the time-
weighted average for workers in the light exposure category is
     1/3 x .7 + 1/3 x .17 + 1/3 x .004 = .291 mg As/m3.
013AS6/A                             5-114                       June 1983

-------
   TABLE 5-28.   ARSENIC EXPOSURES:  1965 SMELTER SURVEY ATMOSPHERIC ARSENIC
                         CONCENTRATIONS (mg/As/m3)
"Heavy exposure area" as classified by Lee and Fraumeni
Arsenic Roaster Area
0.10 0.20
0.10 0.22
0.10 0.25
0.10 0.35
0.10 1.18
0.10 5.00
0.17 12.66
Mean: 1.47
Median: 0.185
"Medium exposure areas" as classified by Lee and Fraumeni
Reverberatory Area
0.03 0.93
0.22 1.00
0.23 1.27
0.36 1.60
0.56 1.66
0.63 1.84
0.66 1.94
0.76 2.06
0.78 2.76
0.78 3.40
0.80 4.14
0.83 8.20
Treater Building and Arsenic Loading
0.10 0.48
0.10 0.62
0.10 3.26
0.11 7.20
"Light exposure areas"
Copper Concentrate Transfer System
0.25
0.65
1.20
Samples from Flue Station
0.10
0.24
Reactor Building
0.001 0.003
0.002 0.009
0.002 0.010
0.002
Mean: 1.56
Median: 0.88











Mean: 1.50
Median: 0.295



as classified by Lee and Fraumeni
Mean: 0.70
Median: 0.65


Mean: 0.17
Median: 0.17

Mean: 0.004
Median: 0.002



Source:   Table X-3, NIOSH Criteria Document (1975).

013AS6/A                             5-115
June 1983

-------
     Under the linear assumption, equation 14 may be expressed in terms of mg
As/m3 working exposure by dividing by .291, which gives the result
     r(d,to) = 2.07 x 10"13 [(d+t0)5-8 - to5'8].                           (15)
     In this case, exposure is expressed in mg As/m3 per 8-hr working day.  To
change the  relationship  so that it expresses the  risk due to a lifetime of
continuous  exposure  to I  ug  As/m3, we  assume  240  days  worked per year,
one mg As/m3 on the job gives the same cumulative exposure as 103 x
1/3 x 240 = 219 ug As/m3 continuous exposure.
      365"
     The age-specific rate due to a continuous 1 ug As/m3 exposure is obtained
by substituting  t  =  0  and d = t =  age  into  equation  (15)  and  dividing  by  219
to arrive  at the correct number of exposure units.   This gives the  result

     r(t) =  9.45 x 10"16 t5'8.                                              (16)

     The unit risk is approximately equivalent to the risk of  induced respira-
tory cancer  in  the median life span.    Based upon 1976 U.S. vital statistics,
the median life  span  is 76.2 years, so  that  the unit  risk  is expressed  approxi-
mately as
                               9 45
 P 1 Jo75'2  9.45 x  10"16  t5'8 =  --  (76.2)6'8 x  10"16 - 8.71 x  10"4.        (17)
      An  additional  approximation consistent with  the  previous unit calcula-
 tions is  obtained by  assuming  that
      r(t)  =  9.45  x  10"16  rt-  +  t.-l-,5.8   t.  ,  <  t  
-------
where t. are  the  ages at the interval boundaries given in U.S.  vital  statis-
       J
tics  records.   This assumes  that  the age-specific  death  rate  due to the
exposure is constant  throughout  the interval and equal to the true value at
the  midpoint  of the interval.   Under  this  approximation,  using 1976 vital
                                                          -3
statistics, the unit risk is estimated to be P ^ 1.25 x 10  .
Evaluation of Goodness-of-Fit.  It is desirable to assess whether the data for
the  low-exposure  group  is consistent with the model utilized to estimate the
unit  risk.  However,  two factors tend to create  a  situation  that would de-
crease this goodness-of-fit and bias the results.  First, the exact values for
each  cell  of  d, t  are  presently  not available.  Second,  the value of  k was
determined on  the basis of all  three  exposure  groups, and does not give as
good  a fit as would be obtained using the low-exposure group alone.
      Brown states (personal communication, 1983) that  the exact values of d,tQ
are  very close to the  midpoint  of the interval, and  that  the  values of k
appear to  be  statistically consistent between  exposure groups.   Thus, distor-
tions of the  data because of  the  use of midpoint values and average k, al-
though inevitable, are  not appreciable.
      The expected number of cases  in each cell  are  calculated using  the rela-
tionship

           E =  Exp + Pyr  x  .603 x 10"13 [d +  tQ)5-8   -tQ5'8],          (19)

in  which Exp  and Pyr are  taken  from Table 5-27 and  d,t  are the midpoints of
the  intervals.   These results are  shown  in  Table 5-29.  A standard chi-square
goodness-of-fit test  is then run,  resulting in  a chi-square value of  X^ =
13.85 with 23.2 = 21 degrees  of freedom and an associated p-value  of  .88.
Unfortunately,  due  to the low expected  number of cases in many of the  cells,
the  X2 approximation  is  of questionable  validity for this  situation.

013AS6/A        '                     5-117                       June 1983

-------
        TABLE 5-29.   OBSERVED AND  EXPECTED  NUMBER  OF  RESPIRATORY  CANCER
         DEATHS FOR  EACH  CELL IN THE  LOW-EXPOSURE  GROUP  OF  TABLE  5-27
d
to 5 15 25 35 45
18
25
35
45
0 0 1
.088 .314 1.;
1 3
>0 3.504 3.836
00 256
.258 .858 2.145 4.358 3.321
03 101
.723 1.641 2.556 2.791 .497
21 110
2.023 2.508 1.428 .371 .026
32 0
55
2.582 1.234 .418
Xli = 13.85, p = .88

     To obtain a more stable approximation, cells with low frequency that are
as close as  possible  to  each other are usually combined.   It is important to
have some criteria  for combining  the data that do not depend upon inspection
of the data  itself.   Two methods  of combining  the  data  are used here.   The
first  is across  columns  (duration exposed), so  that  the  maximum number of
cells  are obtained,  with the constraints that  combined  cells  must have at
least three expected cases, and that all cells combined are consecutive within
a row.   The second approach uses the same technique within a column (age first
exposed).  The results are shown  in Tables  5-30  and 5-31  respectively, giving
chi-square values of  7.01 and 7.61, with p-values of  .41 and  .38.  Thus the
assumed model  is  shown  to be consistent with the observed low-exposure data.
013AS6/A
5-118
June 1983

-------
          TABLE 5-30.  CELLS FROM TABLE 5-29 COMBINED WITHIN ROWS TO
      OBTAIN CELLS WITH THREE OR MORE EXPECTED RESPIRATORY CANCER DEATHS
d
to 5 15
18
25
35
45
55
25

2
3.261
4
4.920
5
4.234
35 45
2 3
5.106 3.836
5 6
4.358 3.321
1
3.288
5
6.356
X2 = 7.01, p = .41
        TABLE 5-31.  CELLS FROM TABLE 5-29 COMBINED WITHIN COLUMNS TO
        OBTAIN CELLS WITH 3 OR MORE EXPECTED RESPIRATORY CANCER DEATHS
d
to 5 15
18
25
35
45
5 6
55 5.674 6.555
25 35 45
1 3
3.504 3.836
3 5
3.345 4.358

1 7
3.162 3.844
2
4.402
X2 = 7.61, p = .38
013AS6/A
5-119
June 1983

-------
5.2.1.4.2.6  The Enterline and Marsh (1982) study.   This  study included all
men (2802 in all) employed at the Tacoma, Washington copper smelter for a year
or more  during  1940-1964.   Their mortality experience  was  observed through
1976.   The  study  involved  over 70,000 person- years of observation, and 104
deaths from cancer of  the  respiratory system were  recorded  (Table 5-32).
Respiratory cancer deaths  had  an SMR of  189.4,  which  was significantly in-
creased at  the  1%  level.  Expected deaths  for Table  5-32  were  based  upon U.S.
white male  mortality  rates.   The respiratory cancer SMR  increases to 198.1
when Washington State mortality rates are applied.
     Enterline  and Marsh  estimated  individual  exposures  to airborne arsenic
using individual work histories,  urine arsenic measurements, and  an  estimated
correlation  between  exposure to  airborne arsenic  and  resulting  levels of
arsenic  in  urine.   Average  urine arsenic levels were available by department
for the  years 1948-52,  1973, 1974, and 1975.   Linear interpolations  were  used
to estimate levels between  1952 and 1973.   Levels  during 1949-1952  were  as-
sumed to  hold  prior to that time.  By coupling  these data with employee work
histories,  Enterline  and  Marsh estimated individual cumulative exposures for
various times in units  of ug-years/A urinary arsenic.
     Pinto  et   al.  (1977)  compared  airborne concentrations of  arsenic  with
urinary  arsenic levels for 24 workers wearing personal  air samplers  for  5
successive  days.   A regression analysis  of these data showed a  highly signifi-
cant  linear correlation  between airborne and  urinary arsenic (p < 0.01).
Average  airborne arsenic  in units of  ug/m3  was  estimated to  be  0.304  times
average  urinary arsenic levels in units  of ug/£.
 013AS6/A                              5-120                        June  1983

-------
        TABLE 5-32.  OBSERVED DEATHS AND SMRs FOR 2802 SMELTER WORKERS
  WHO WORKED A YEAR OR MORE 1940-64, FOLLOWED THROUGH 1976, BY CAUSE OF DEATH

Cause of death (7th revision code)
All causes of death
Tuberculosis (001-019)
Malignant neoplasms (140-148)
Buccal cavity and pharynx (140-148)
Digestive organs & peritoneum (150-159)
Esophagus (150)
Stomach (151)
Large intestine (153)
Rectum (154)
Biliary passages and liver (155-156)
Pancreas (157)
All other digestive organs (residual)
Respiratory system (160-164)
Larynx (161)
Bronchus, trachea, and lung (162-163)
All other respiratory system (residual)
Prostate (177)
Testes and other genital (178-179)
Kidney (180)
Bladder and other urinary organs (181)
Malignant melanoma of skin (19)
Eye (192)
Central nervous system (193)
Thyroid gland (194)
Bone (196)
Lymphatic & haematopoietic (200-205)
Lymphosarcoma and reticulosarcoma (200)
Hodgkins' disease (201)
Leukemia and aleukemia (204)
Other lymphopoietic tissue (202, 203, 205)
Other malignant neoplasms (residual)
Benign neoplasms (210-239)
Diabetes mellitus (260)
Stroke (333-334)
Heart disease (400-443)
Hypertension without heart disease (444-447)
Nonmalignant respiratory disease (470-527)
Influenza and pneumonia (480-493)
All other respiratory diseases (residual)
Ulcer of stomach and duodenum (540-541)
Cirrhosis of liver (581)
Chronic nephritis (592)
External causes of death (800-998)
Accidents (899-962)
Suicides (963, 970-979)
Other external causes (residual)
Other causes of death (residual)
Unknown causes
TB 	 	 	 ; — frm 	 me 	 • — ;r-= 	 — 	 — 	 — — — — — — — — — ^_— — — ^— — ___
Observed
Deaths
1061
4
231
7
65
3
17
21
9
3
11
1
104
2
100
2
11
1
6
4
0
1
3
0
2
17
4
2
6
5
10
2
12
91
412
1
60
24
36
7
22
6
81
61
17
3
85
47

SMR
103.2
27.6**
123.6**
110.7
108.9
66.2
122.1
120.4
122.4
64.1
106.0
71.6
189.4**
67.7
194.9**
305.0
79.0
92.6
133.3
63.0
—
492.7
59.8
—
175.0
93.8
93.2
83.9
78.7
130.4
82.3
78.6
84.8
111.4
92.5
18.8
108.6
92.9
122.4
75.5
101.9
87.5
94.2
100.6
84.8
56.2
86.1
--
  p <.05, ** p <.01
Source:   Enter!ine and Marsh (1982).
013AS6/A                             5-121                       June 1983

-------
     To investigate  dose-response,  Enter!ine and  Marsh divided  the  total
person-years of observation  into  5  groups by cumulative arsenic exposure (0
lag), and also by cumulative arsenic exposure up to 10 years prior to  the year
of observation (10-year lag).  In this type of analysis, as a worker continues
to be  exposed  to  arsenic,  he or she will  contribute person-years to progres-
sively higher  exposure  categories.   The numbers of respiratory cancer deaths
and corresponding expected numbers for each of these groups are given  in Table
5-33.  In this  table,  urinary arsenic levels provided by Enterline and Marsh
have been converted  to  airborne exposures in ng/m3-years,  using the  factor
0.304  estimated by  Pinto  et al. (1977).  The observed numbers of cancers are
all significantly increased at the higher exposure levels.
     Although  the Enterline  and Marsh  (1982)  study  is  not  as  large  as  that  of
Lee-Feldstein  (1982),  it  does involve a sizable number of respiratory cancer
deaths (104).   Workers  were  followed  for  an  extended  period—an  average  of  25
years  per individual.   Several  features of the analysis render  it more amen-
able to  quantitative risk  estimation  than the analysis  used  by Lee-Feldstein.
Enterline and  Marsh  made  estimates of individual exposure histories,  whereas
Lee-Feldstein  did not.  The type of dose-response analysis used by Enterline
and  Marsh is also more suitable for quantitative risk estimation.  The expo-
sure estimates based on a 10-year  lag probably yield a more realistic dose-
response than  those  that  do  not utilize a lag;  because the latency period for
respiratory  cancer  is generally greater  than 10 years (cf.  Doll  and  Peto,
1978), exposure during the  last 10 years prior to observation  would  not be
expected to  affect respiratory  cancer  mortality.
 013AS6/A                              5-122                       June  1983

-------
     By applying urinary arsenic measurements made during the years 1948-52 to
earlier years,  Enter!ina and Marsh probably  underestimated exposures prior to
1948.   This would  result  in an overestimate of  the  carcinogenic potency of
arsenic.   A calculation by  Enterline and Marsh  of SMRs by both year of  hire
and cumulative  exposure indicates that workers in a given cumulative exposure
category tend to  have  at  least roughly comparable SMRs  irrespective  of the
year of hire.   This suggests that exposure estimates  for earlier years are not
greatly in error.   However,  further  investigation of this problem would be
useful.
     Because smoking is also an important risk factor for respiratory cancer,
it would have been helpful  if data  on smoking habits had been available for
analysis.   Pinto  and Enterline  (undated) report  on smoking histories obtained
in 1975 from 550  active employees at the Tacoma  smelter.  Of  these  employees,
59.6%  were  active smokers, compared to  45.4% in 1970 for U.S.  males  aged
21-64.   If this  excess  of smokers holds in  general for the smelter workers,
then a small fraction of the excess  in respiratory cancer could  have been due
to smoking.
     Development of risk estimates:   The data  from Table 5-33 were used for
quantitative risk assessment.   The  relative risks  (observed/expected)  from
this table  are  graphed in  Figures  5-6  and 5-7, and  the absolute risks
([observed- expected]/person-years)  in Figures 5-8 and 5-9.   Although there is
no clear trend  of increasing SMRs with increasing exposures, such a trend is
present for  absolute risk.   Results of  applying chi-square  goodness-of-fit
tests of the  relative-  and absolute-risk models with  k  =  1 and  k = 2  are
recorded in Table  5-25.  The maximum likelihood  estimates of  the carcinogenic
013AS6/A                             5-123                       June 1983

-------
          TABLE 5-33.   DATA FROM TABLE 8 OF ENTERLINE AND MARSH (1982)
                         WITH PERSON-YEARS OF OBSERVATION ADDED
Cumulative Exposure3          Person-Years  .      Observed       Expected
     ug/m3-years              of Observation        Deaths         Deaths
     91.8
     263
     661
    1381
    4091
                                                    0 Lag
10902
21642
14623
13898
9398
8
18
21
26
31
4.0
11.0
10.3
14.1
12.7
                                                10-Year Lag
91.8
263
661
1381
4091
27802
16453
11213
9571
5423
10
22
26
22
24
6.4
12.5
11.5
12.4
9.7
 Exposures are  in ug/m3-years estimated  by  the  formula  (I |jg/l-years)  (0.304)
where I is mean urinary exposure index from Enterline and Marsh (1982) Table 8
and 0.304  is  the  relation between urinary  and  airborne arsenic estimated  by
Pinto et al.  (1977).

 Furnished by Dr.  Enterline (personal communication).
013AS6/A                             5-124                       June 1983

-------
    3-
w
E
0)

to
0)
DC
                                                       Dose-response data
                                                        is from Table 5-33.
                                                        Fit is by absolute
                                                           risk model.
    o-
                     1000            2000            3000

                         Cumulative Dose (yug/m3- years)
4000
  Figure 5-6. Relative risks and 90% confidence limits for zero-lag data of Enterline
  and Marsh (1982).
                                       5-125
        June 1983

-------
   3 ~"
—
rr
                                                        Dose response data
                                                         is from Table 5 33
                                                          Fit is by relative
                                                           risk model
   0-
                     1000
2000
3000
4000
                        Cumulative Dose  (/vg/m3-years)
  Figure 57. Relative risks and 90% confidence limits for 10 year lag data of Enterline
  and Marsh (1982).
                                       5-126
                                            June  1983

-------
o
o
o
If)
E
0)
                                                         Dose-response data
                                                         is from Table 5-33.
                                                          Fit is by absolute
                                                            risk model.
0
                     1000
                                  2000
3000
4000
                         Cumulative Dose  (>L/g/m3- years)
 Figure 5-8. Absolute risks and 90% confidence limits for zero-lag data of Enterline
 and Marsh (1982).
                                         5-127
                                                                             June  1983

-------
Q)
O
(fi
                                                       Dose-response data
                                                        is from Table 5 33
                                                         Fit is by relative
                                                          risk model
                     1000             2000             3000
                         Cumulative Dose (pg/m3- years)
  I
4000
  Figure 5-9. Absolute risks and 90% confidence limits for 10 year lag data of Enterline
  and Marsh (1982).
                                       5-128
                                                                                June 1983

-------
potency parameter a1  are  also listed in Table 5-25.  The maximum-likelihood
fits of these  models  are  graphed in Figures 5-6 through 5-9.  The quadratic
fit  (k  =  2) is poor  for  both the absolute- and relative-risk  models with
either 0 lag or 10-year lag data (p less than 0.001 in each case).   The linear
fits to the  relative  risk models are also  relatively  poor (p = 0.02  for the 0
lag  data and 0.006  for the 10-year lag data).   On  the other hand,  the linear
fits of the  absolute  risk model are all acceptable (p = 0.24 for 0  lag data
and 0.14 for 10-year lag data).
     The unit  risks  (additional  risks  of respiratory cancer death from life-
                        3
time exposure  to 1 |jg/m airborne arsenic)  obtained from each of the fits  for
which the chi-square p-value is 0.01 or higher, are also listed in Table 5-25.
These risks  were estimated  by  applying  (1)  or  (2),  (8), and  (9) with D. based
                                  3
upon a constant exposure of 1 ug/m .   Specifically,

                    D. = 4.56[5(i-l) + 2.5]                                (17)
was used for the 0 lag data, and
                    D. = 4.56[5(i-l) - 7.5]                                (18)

was used for the 10-year lag data.   These D. represent the cumulative exposure
        3                                               3
in  ug/m  resulting from a  constant  exposure to 1 ug/m  from  birth  to the
mid-point of the ith  5-year age interval.  The factor 4.56 converts from
occupational to environmental  exposures,  and is explained at equation  (11).
5.2.1.4.2.7  The Ott  et al.  (1974) study.   Ott et  al.  (1974) compared the
age-specific death patterns of 174 decedents exposed to arsenic in the produc-
tion of pesticides to  those of 1809 decedents who  were not exposed to arseni-
cal s.  By fitting  the death patterns of the unexposed decedents to  a mathe-
matical  function, an  estimate  was obtained  of the  probability that a death at
a particular age and  during a  particular epoch was due to respiratory cancer.

013AS6/A                             5-129                       June 1983

-------
This  function  was used  to  estimate expected respiratory  cancer  deaths in
various exposure  categories  for  the exposed decedents.   Cumulative exposures
were  estimated for exposed  decendents,  using work histories and estimates of
average exposures in various jobs.   The exposure estimates were made by indus-
trial  hygienists  familiar with the processes.  Expected  cancer deaths were
compared with  observed  to  obtain observed- to-expected  ratios.   Table 5-34
shows the  results of  Ott et al.'s  dose-response analysis.  The data  in this
table are  all  reproduced directly  from Table 4 of Ott et  al.  (1974),  except
for the cumulative exposures.  Average  total  exposures in mg provided by Ott
et al. were converted to cumulative exposures in pg/m3 years by multiplying by
the factor

                   	1000 ijg/mg	  .                      (19)
               (4 m  /day)(21 days/mo)(12 mo/year)

The values included in this factor  are  not  in doubt because use of  the factor
simply negates the calculation of total  exposure made by Ott et al.
     Decedent studies such  as  this are more subject to bias then prospective
studies such as those of Lee-Feldstein  (1982) and Enter!ine and Marsh  (1982).
If, for example,  in  some age category arsenic exposure increased the mortality
from  some  other  disease in  addition to respiratory cancer,  an analyis of
decedents  might show  an  artificially low effect of arsenic upon  respiratory
cancer for this age  group (because  there might be  an artificially large number
of total deaths).  It is also  of some concern that Ott et  al.  did not  clearly
describe how the  study cohort was defined.
013AS6/A                             5-130                       June 1983

-------
          TABLE  5-34.   DATA FROM TABLE  4  OF  OTT  ET  AL.  (1974)
Cumulative Exposure
ug/m3-years
41.8
125
250
417
790
1544
3505
6451
29497
Observed
Deaths
1
2
4
3
3
2
3
5
5
Expected
Deaths
1.77
1.01
1.38
1.36
1.70
0.97
0.77
0.79
0.72
Exposures are in ng/m3-years estimated by:
                    d mg x 1000 ug/mg
          4 m3/day 21 days/month 12 months/year
     where d is average total exposure from Table 4 of Ott et al.


     This study  involved  primarily short-term exposures, as less than 25% of
the decedents  had  worked  with arsenicals for more than one year.   Thus, this
study  is  less appropriate for estimating risks  from  lifetime environmental
exposure than  a  comparable study involving longer exposures.  The study also
was quite  small; only 28  respiratory  cancer deaths occurred among exposed
decedents.
     Development of risk estimates:  The dose-response data in Table 5-34 were
used in an  assessment of risk.  Because of  the  nature of the study,  only a
relative risk  model  could be applied to these data.   The dose-response for
relative risk  is graphed  in Figure 5-10.  The response  in the most  highly
exposed group  falls  far below that predicted by  the  lower-dose data, and  is
omitted from  Figure  5-10.   This is possibly due to the fact that some of the

013AS6/A                             5-131                       June 1983

-------
£86L
                                                            Relative Risk
         3; 31
         <5' to_

         5 0)
         (B "•*
         o 2.
         C w
         T3 3T


         ||


         » 5S
         Q. O


            o
            o
            3

            £
            CD
            3
            O
            n


            3

            w
            -h
            O

            a
            Q)

            Q)
            o
            CD
            r*

            Q)
            (O

-------
more highly exposed workers  wore  respirators.   Because of this shortfall in
response, and also because the exposures to this group were the furthest from
the low-level environmental  exposures  of interest, the data from the highest
exposure group were omitted from the analysis.
     Results of applying chi-square goodness-of-fit tests of the relative-risk
model  with  k  =  1 and k = 2 are listed in Table 5-25.   The maximum-likelihood
estimates of  the  carcinogenic  potency parameter a1 are  also  listed in this
table.   The maximum-likelihood fits are graphed in Figure 5-10.  Both of these
fits are  acceptable (p = 0.66  for  k =  1  and p = 0.23  for  k = 2), although the
data appear to  be  more  linear  than quadratic.  It  should  be kept in  mind that
the sample  size was  quite  small in this study, and consequently a wide range
of curve shapes would probably provide an acceptable fit.
     The  risk estimation method described in the  previous  section is based
upon the  life table method of  analysis,  and does  not  seem particularly  appro-
priate  for  a  decedent analysis.   Because the method  employed  by Ott et al.
seems to  estimate  a  relative probability of respiratory  cancer death, it was
decided to estimate the extra lifetime probability of respiratory cancer death
                                  3
from lifetime exposure to  d ug/m  airborne arsenic,  using the expression

          P0(l  + a'[(72)(4.56)d]k) - PQ - PQa'[(72)(4.56)]k.                (20)

Here PO is  the  lifetime probability of  respiratory cancer mortality given  by
(8), and  is equal to 0.0451  if 1976 U.S. mortality rates  are used.   The factor
72  represents  life expectancy  in  the  U.S.  in years.   The factor 4.56 converts
from occupational  to  environmental exposures, and is explained at equation
(11).    Thus,  the term in the  square  brackets  in  (20) represents the average
                                         3
total exposure  over  a life  span  in  ug/m  years,  which  is  the same as the
measure used in estimating the potency a1.

013AS6/A                             5-133                       June 1983

-------
5.2.1.4.2.8  Discussion. Table 5-25 summarizes the fits of both absolute- and



relative-risk models, with either k = 1 or k = 2,  to  dose-response data from 4



different studies.   Table  5-25  also displays the carcinogenic potencies a1.



It should be  noted  that the potencies estimated from different models are  in



different units, and are therefore not comparable.



     In every case,  a  linear model (k =  1)  fitted  the data better than the



corresponding quadratic model (k = 2).  In every case but two,  the fits of  the



quadratic model  could  be  rejected at the 0.01 level.  The  two  exceptions



involved the two  smallest  data sets (Higgins et al.  absolute risk, and Ott et



al.) and in  the former case the fit  was  very marginal (p = 0.017).   On the



other hand,  for each data  set a linear model provided  an adequate fit.  Also,



in every case,  an absolute-risk linear model fit the  data better than the



corresponding relative-risk  linear  model.   The  p-values for the fits of the



absolute-risk linear model  ranged from 0.025 to  0.75.



     The estimated unit  risk is  presented for each  fit  for  which the chi-



square goodness-of-fit p-value  is  greater than  0.01.   The unit risks derived



from linear models--8  in all—range from 0.0013 to  0.0136.  The  largest of



these is from the Ott  et al. study, which probably  is the least reliable for



developing quantitative estimates,  and which also  involved exposures to penta-



valent arsenic, whereas  the other studies involved  trivalent  arsenic.   The



unit risks derived from the linear (k = 1) absolute-risk models are considered



to be the most reliable; although derived from 5 sets of data involving 4 sets



of investigators and 2 distinct exposed populations,  these estimates are quite



consistent,  ranging from 0.0013 to 0.0076.



     To establish a single point estimate, the geometric mean for data sets is



obtained within distinct exposed populations, and the  final estimate  is taken



to be the geometric  mean of those  values.   This  process  is illustrated in



Table 5-35.



013AS6/A                             5-134                       June 1983

-------
                                    _ o
     The final  estimate is 4.29 x 10  ,  where exposure is in ug/m3 of continu-

ous exposure.  Based  upon an  assumed 20m  tidal volume of air and a 30% ab-
                                                       _3
sorption rate,  this amounts to a unit risk of 4.29 x 10   ~ (.3 x 20 x .001/70)

= 50.1 in units of mg/kg absorbed dose per day.
                   TABLE 5-35.   COMBINED UNIT RISK ESTIMATES
                        FOR ABSOLUTE-RISK LINEAR MODELS
                                                  Geometric
                                                  Mean Unit     Final Estimated
Exposure Source     Study          Unit Risk        Risk         Unit Risk

                                            -3
Anaconda smelter    Brown & Chu    1.25 x 10 ,              ~
                    Lee-Feldstein  2.80 x 10"^    2.56 x 10                ,,
                    Higgins        4.90 x 10 6                   4.29 x 10 5

ASARCO smelter      Enter!ine &              ,
                      Marsh        6.81 x 10 ,              ,
                                   7.60 x 10 J    7.19 x 10 ^
     Although the estimates derived from the various studies are quite consis-

tent, there are a number of uncertainties associated with them.  The estimates

were made from occupational studies that involved exposures only after employ-

ment age was reached.  In estimating risks from environmental exposures through-

out  life,  it  was assumed, through either  the  relative-risk model  (1)  or  the

absolute-  risk  model (2), that  the  increase in the age-specific  mortality

rates of lung cancer was a function only of cumulative exposures,  irrespective

of how  the  exposure was accumulated.  Although  this  assumption provides an

adequate description  of  all  of the data,  it may be  in  error when  applied to

exposures that begin very early in life.   Similarly, the  linear models pos-

sibly are  inaccurate at  low  exposures,  even though they provide  excellent

descriptions of the experimental data.



013AS6/A                             5-135                       June 1983

-------
     The risk  assessment  methods  employed were severely constrained  by  the
fact that they were based only upon the analyses performed  and reported by the
original authors—analyses  that  had been performed for purposes  other than
quantitative risk assessment.  For  example,  although  other measures of expo-
sure might  be  more  appropriate,  the analyses were necessarily  based upon
cumulative  dose,  since  that  was  the only usable measure  reported.   Given
greater access to the data from these studies, other dose  measures, as well as
models other than the simple  relative-risk and absolute-risk models,  could  be
studied.  It is  possible  that such wide analyses would indicate that other
approaches are more appropriate than the ones applied  here.
5.2.1.4.3  Unit risk for water.  The best data available for making quantita-
tive cancer risk  estimates  for ingestion of  arsenic  in water are the data
collected by Tseng et al.  (1968).   They surveyed a stable  population of 40,421
individuals who  lived in  a  rural area  along  the southwest coast  of Taiwan  and
who were  known to  have  consumed  drinking  water containing  arsenic.  The
occurrences of skin  cancer  among this population, and the arsenic concentra-
tions in their drinking water, were measured.  Since the population was stable,
the study can  be  viewed as  a  lifetime  feeding study,  and the data  may be  used
to predict  the lifetime probability  of skin  cancer  caused by the  ingestion of
arsenic.
     A model estimating the cancer  rate as a function of drinking  water  arse-
nic concentration was generated  using  information from the  above  study in  its
published form, which is a  summary of data collected by the investigators.  If
the original data had been  available, a more  exact mathematical analysis would
have been possible.
013AS6/A                             5-136                       June 1983

-------
     Doll  (1971) has suggested that the relationship between the incidence of
some site-specific cancers, age,  and  exposure level of a  population  may be
expressed as:
                              I(x,t) = kBx"^'1                       (21)
where x  is  the  exposure level (which can be measured by the water concentra-
tion in  ppm), t is the age of the population, and B, m, k  are unknown para-
meters.
     However, the  data  collected  by  Tseng et al. (1968) was obtained at one
point in  time,  and since skin cancer has only a marginal effect on the death
rate, the obtained rates  may  be viewed more accurately as the probability of
having contracted  skin  cancer by  time t.  The relationship  between this prob-
ability, often referred to as  the cumulative probability density or prevalence
F(x,t),  and the incidence or age-specific or hazard rate, may be expressed as:
                         F(x,t) = 1 - exp [-/oKx,s) ds].                (22)
     Utilizing equation (21) as the form of the incidence rate, the prevalence
may be expressed as
                           F(x,t) = 1 - exp (-Bxmtk),                     (23)
which is a Weibull distribution.
     In Table 5-36, adapted from information in Tseng, et al. (1968), estimates
are given  of  F(x,t)  for different age  and water  concentration  groupings  for
males.   The prevalence  for females is  less  than  for  males,  and therefore is
not used to estimate risk.

013AS6/A                             5-137                       June 1983

-------
     To use this data, specific values for x and t had to be obtained for the
intervals.   Where the  intervals were  closed,  the midpoint was  utilized.   For
the greater than 0.6  ppm group,  the midpoint between  0.6 and  the greatest
recorded value, 1.8, was taken, resulting in 1.2 ppm.  For age 60 or greater,
a value of 70 was utilized somewhat arbitrarily, being the same increase over

      TABLE 5-36.   AGE-EXPOSURE-SPECIFIC PREVALENCE RATES FOR SKIN CANCER
Exposure
in ppm3
0 - .29
(0.15)
0.30 - 0.59
(0.450)
>0.6
Tl.2)
Source: Tseng

20-39
(30)
0.0013
0.0043
0.0224
et al. (1968).
AGE
40-59
(50)
0.0065
0.0477
0.0983


>60
T70)
0.0481
0.1634
0.2553

          aRange given by authors.   Midpoint is in parentheses.

the lower  level  as  that  in  the other  two age  intervals.  The  values  for  (x,t)
to relate  to  the prevalence estimates  are  shown  in  parentheses in  Table  5-36.

     From equation  (23) it  follows that
                                   =  ln(B) +  m ln(x) +  k  ln(t),         (24)
which  is  multiple-linear in form.   Estimating  the parameters by the  usual
least-square techniques, the following relationship is obtained:

       ln(  -  ln[l - F(x,t)]) = 17.548 + 1.192  ln(x)  + 3.881 ln(t),      (25)

013AS6/A                             5-138                       June  1983

-------
which is an excellent fit, having a multiple correlation coefficient of 0.986,


and a standard error on the exposure regression m of .138.




     Equation (25) may be expressed as


                     F(x,t) = l-exp-[2.429 x 10*8(X1'192)(t3-881)]

                                         i  192
                              =  l-exp-[X       H(t)]                    (26)




If the  parameter  m =  1.192 were  in  fact  equal  to 1, then for a given value of


t, equation (26) would be "one-hit" in form.
     To test this  hypothesis  (i.e.,  Ho: m = 1) the student "t" test is used,


giving the result:




                         1.192-1
                     6    0.138



which  is  not  significant at the 0.1 level.  Thus, there is insufficient evi-


dence to reject the hypothesis that the dose-response relationship is "one-hit"


even at  the  0.1 level.   However, a quadratic model  would  be  rejected at  the


p<.001 level.





     Fixing m = 1, the following relationship is obtained:


                            F(x,t) = 1 - exp[-g(t)x].                (27)
013AS6/A                             5-139                       June 1983

-------
Transforming this equation to its linear form (as in equation 23) and obtain-
ing the least-square linear estimates of B  and v,  it is  found that:
       g (t) =  exp(-17.5393)  t3'853,  where B = 2.41423  x  10"8,  k = 3.853.
     The data used to obtain these estimates are shown in Table 5-37, and the
goodness-of-fit is illustrated in Figure 5-11.

     The function
          F(x,t) = l-exp[-2.41423 x 10"8 x t3'853],                   (28)

is the probability of  contracting skin cancer by  age t, given that an indi-
vidual had a  life-time  exposure to x ppm  in  his  drinking water (and lived
until age t).
     To obtain  a  unit  risk estimate, lifetime risk is assumed to be approxi-
mately equal  to the  risk to the median life span in the absence of competing
risk.  The unit risk is  thus obtained by  substituting x = 1 and t = 76.2  (the
median U.S. life  span  based upon 1976  vital  statistics  data) into equation
(28).  This gives the result
               P(l) - l-exp[-2.414 x 10"8 x 76.23'853] = .350         (29)
013AS6/A                             5-140                       June 1983

-------
    TABLE 5-37.  DATA UiILIZED TO OBTAIN PREDICTOR EQUATION AND FIGURE 5-12
ppm Age at Medical
Arsenic Examination


x

0.15


0.45


1.20




t

30
50
70
30
50
70
30
50
70
Skin Cancer
Prevalence Rate
F(x,
Observed
Rate

0.0013
0.0063
0.0481
0.0043
0.0477
0.1634
0.0224
0.0983
0.2553
t)
Expected
Rate

0.0031
0.0127
0.0455
0.0053
0.0375
0.1304
0.0141
0.0969
0.3110
Transformed Skin
Cancer Prevalence Rate
-ln(-lntl-F(
-17.5393 + 3.

Observed

6.64474
5.03269
3.00993
5.44699
3.01849
1.72368
3.78739
2.26844
1.22155
8531nt+lnx

Expected

6.33160
4.36341
3.06695
5.23299
3.26480
1.96834
4.25216
2.28397
0.98751
The exponent  is  the slope estimate for  cancer  risks at low doses, so that:
          P(x)-.430 x     for small x, where x is in ppm.                  (30)
     To express the unit in mg/kg/day exposures, it is assumed that two liters
of water  are  consumed per day by  an  individual  weighing 70 kg.   Under the
assumption that  100%  of  the  arsenic  is  absorbed  through  the  gut,  the  slope  in
units of mg/kg/day absorbed dose is .430 -=-(.24- 70) = 15.8.
     A number  of  potential factors exist  that  could possibly make the Taiwan-
ese data unsuitable as surrogate data for the U.S.  population.   Among them are
racial, dietary,  and  nutritional  differences.   Also,  exposure  to ergotamine
was confounded with  arsenic  exposure in  the well  water—a fact  which also
could have modified the  results.   However,  there is no direct evidence demon-
strating the  role of  these agents in the carcinogenic  response  to ingested

013AS6/A                             5-141                        June 1983

-------
   0.0009--7.0
   0.0025- • 6.0
   0.0067-
   0.0181- • 4.0
   0.0486- -3.0
   0.1266- -2.0
   0.3078--1.0
   0.6321 -+ 0.0

              -2.
                     t=30
-5.0
                     t=50
-1.6      -1.2     --8
                                                         logx
                                   -.4      .0     .4
-I	1	1	1	1	1	1	
 0.135    0.202   0.301   0.449    0.670   1.000   1.492  x(ppm)
Figure 5-11. Relationship between transformed prevalence and log ppm arsenic in
water, log age.
                                           5-142
                                                              June 1983

-------
arsenic.   Furthermore, a  recent  extensive review by Andelman  (1983)  of the
arsenic dose-response model developed here, demonstrates that  presently there
is no quantitative evidence that is inconsistent with the model.   The Andelman
study also  showed that there does  not appear to be any population  in  the U.S.
that could  be  studied that would  have  a  reasonable  power  to contradict the
hypothesis  that the Taiwanese dose-response model is consistent with  the U.S.
dose-response.
5.2.1.4.4 Relative Potency.  One of the uses of the concept of unit risk is to
compare the  relative  potencies  of carcinogens.  To estimate relative potency
on a per-mole basis, the unit risk slope factor is multiplied by the molecular
weight, and  the  resulting number  is expressed  in  terms  of (mMol/kg/day)-1.
This is called the relative potency index.
     Figure  5-12  is  a histogram representing  the  frequency distribution of
potency indices of  52 chemicals  evaluated by the CAG as suspect carcinogens.
The  actual  data summarized  by  the histogram  are presented in Table 5-38.
Where human  data  were available  for a  compound, they were  used  to calculate
the index.  Where no human data were available, animal  oral studies and animal
inhalation  studies were used, in that order.   Animal oral  studies  were  selec-
ted over  animal  inhalation studies because they have been  made on  most  of  the
chemicals, thus allowing potency comparisons by route.
     The potency index for arsenic, based on the Tseng et al.  study,  is 2.25 x
  3               ~1
10   (mMol/kg/day)  .   This is derived by means of the slope estimate from the
Tseng et al. study,  which  is 15(mg/kg/day)  .
     Multiplication by the molecular weight of 149.8 gives  a potency  index of
          +3
2.25 x 10   .   Rounding off to the  nearest order of magnitude gives a  value of
013AS6/A                             5-143                       June 1983

-------
  4th
quartile
  3rd
quartile
                          2nd
                         quartile
                                +-
                              2x10
                                                               1st
                                                              quartile
                                      1x10
     4x10
                                                              +3
                  o
                                    I
 246
Log of Potency Index
             8
Figure 5-12. Histogram representing the frequency distribution  of the potency
indices of 52 suspect carcinogens evaluated by the Carcinogen Assessment Group.
                                      5-144
                                        June 1983

-------
TABLE 5-38.  RELATIVE CARCINOGENIC POTENCIES AMOUNG 52 CHEMICALS EVALUATED
     BY THE CARCINOGEN ASSESSMENT GROUP AS SUSPECT HUMAN CARCINOGENS
Compounds
Acrylonitrile
Aflatoxin B-,
-L
Aldrin
Ally! Chloride
Arsenic
B[a]P
Benzene
Benzidine
Beryllium
Cadmium
Carbon Tetrachl oride
Chlordane
Chlorinated Ethanes
1,2-dichl oroethane
1,1, 2- trichl oroethane
1,1,2, 2- tetrachl oroethane
Hexachl oroethane
Chloroform
Chromium
DDT
Dichlorobenzidine
1,1-dichloroethylene
Dieldrin
Dinitrotoluene
Diphenylhydrazine
Epichlorohydrin
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
Bis(chloromethyl)ether
Slope Molecular
(mg/kg/day)-l Weight
0.24(W)
2924
11.4
1.19xlO~2
15(H)
11.5
5.2xlO~2(W)
234(W)
4.86
6.65(W)
l.SOxlO"1
1.61

6.90x!0"2
5.73xlO"2
0.20
1.42x!0"2
7xlO~2
41
8.42
1.69
1.04(1)
30.4
0.31
0.77
9.9xlO~3
1.14
9300(1)
53.1
312.3
369.4
76.5
149.8
252.3
78
184.2
9
112.4
153.8
409.8

98.9
133.4
167.9
236.7
119.4
104
354.5
253.1
97
380.9
182
180
92.5
143
115
Order of
Magnitude
Potency (Iog10^
Index Index
lxlO+1
9xlO+5
4xlO+3
gxio"1
2xlO+3
3xlO+3
4x10°
4xlO+4
4xlO+1
7xlO+2
2xlO+1
7xlO+2

7x10°
8x10°
3xlO+1
3x10°
8x10°
4xlO+3
3xlO+3
4xlO+2
lxlO+2
lxlO+4
6xlO+1
lxlO+2
9X10"1
2xlO+2
lxlO+6
+1
+6
+4
0
+3
+3
+1
+5
+2
+3
+1
+3

+1
+1
+1
0
+1
+4
+3
+3
+2
+4
+2
+2
0
+2
+6
013AS6/A
5-145
June 1983

-------
                              TABLE  5-38.  (continued)
Compounds
Ethylene Dibromide (EDB)
Ethyl ene Oxide
Formaldehyde
Heptachlor
Hexachl orobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachl orocycl ohexane
technical grade
alpha isomer
beta isomer
gamma isomer
Nickel
Nitrosamines
Di methyl nitrosamine
Di ethyl nitrosamine
Di butyl nitrosamine
N-nitrosopyrrol idine
N-nitroso-N-ethyl urea
N-nitroso-N-methylurea
N-nitroso-di phenyl ami ne
PCBs
Phenols
2,4,6-trichlorophenol
Tetrachl orodi oxi n
Tetrachl oroethyl ene
Toxaphene
Trichl oroethyl ene
Vinyl Chloride
Slope Molecular
(mg/ kg/day )-l Weight
8.51
0.63(1)
2.14X10"2
3.37
1.67
7.75xlO~2

4.75
11.12
1.84
1.33
1.15(W)

25.9(not
43.5(not
5.43
2.13
32.9
302.6
4.92xlO"3
4.34

1.99xlO"2
4.25xl05
5.31xlO"2
1.13
1. 26x10" 2
1.75xlO"2
187.9
44.0
(I) 30
373.3
284.4
261

290.9
290.9
290.9
290.9
58.7

by qi)74.1
by q*)102.1
158.2
100.2
117.1
103.1
198
324

197.4
322
165.8
414
131.4
(I) 62.5
Order of
Magnitude
Potency (Iog10^
Index Index
2xlO+3
3xlO+1
exio"1
lxlO+3
5xlO+2
2xlO+1

lxlO+3
3xlO+3
5xlO+2
4xlO+2
7xlO+1

2xlO+3
4xlO+3
9xlO+2
2xlO+2
4xlO+3
3xlO+4
1x10°
lxlO+3

4x10
lxlO+8
9x10°
5xlO+2
2x10°
1x10°
+3
+1
0
+3
+3
+1

+3
+3
+3
+3
+2

+3
+4
+3
+2
+4
+4
0
+3

+1
+8
+1
+3
0
0
013AS6/A
5-146
June 1983

-------
                           TABLE 5-38  (continued)

Remarks:
     1.    Animal  slopes are 95% upper!imit  slopes  based on the linear multi-
          stage model.  They  are calculated based  on  animal  oral studies,
          except  for those indicated by I (animal inhalation), W  (human occu-
          pational  exposure),  and H  (human  drinking water exposure).  Human
          slopes  are  point estimate, based  on  linear  non-threshold model.

     2.    The potency  index is  a rounded-off slope in  (mMoI/kg/day)-! and is
          calculated by multiplying  the  slopes  in  (mg/kg/day)-l by the mole-
          cular weight of  the  compound.

     3.    Not all  the carcinogenic potencies presented  in this table represent
          the  same  degree  of  certainty.   All are  subject  to  change as new
          evidence becomes available.
10  ,  which is the scale presented on the horizontal axis of Figure 5-12.   The

index of 2.25 x 10   lies at the bottom of the first quartile of the 52 suspect

carcinogens.

     Ranking of the  relative  potency indices is subject  to the uncertainty

involved in comparing  estimates  of potency for different chemicals based on

different routes  of  exposure  to different species, and using studies of dif-

ferent quality.   Furthermore,  all  the indices are based on estimates of low-

dose  risk  using  linear  extrapolation  from the observational range.   Thus,

these indices  are not  valid for the purpose  of  comparing potencies in the

experimental or observational  range if linearity does not exist there.

5.2.1.5  Summary and Conclusions of the Carcinogenicity of Arsenic

5.2.1.5.1  Qualitative summary.  Human studies of  the  effects of  arsenic  from

smelters, drinking water,  pesticide  manufacturing  plants, and medicinals  have

been  conducted.   These are summarized  in  Table 5-1.  Studies of five indepen-

dent  smelter worker  populations  have all  found an  association between  occupa-

tional arsenic  exposure  and lung cancer  mortality.  Several of the smelter
013AS6/A                             5-147                       June 1983

-------
studies have found a dose response both by intensity and by duration of expo-
sure.   The risk of  lung  cancer mortality in  the high dose  group of one study
of smelter workers in Japan was found to be 10 times that expected.  In addi-
tion,  some studies of communities surrounding smelters have found an associa-
tion between geographic  proximity to  the smelter and lung cancer mortality.
     Both proportionate  mortality and cohort studies of pesticide manufactur-
ing workers have demonstrated an excess of lung cancer deaths in that  occupa-
tion.  One study of the population around a pesticide manufacturing plant found
that residents of the  area surrounding the plant were also at an excess risk
of lung cancer.  Several case reports of arsenical pesticide applicators have
also shown an association between arsenical exposure and lung cancer.
     A study of 40,000  persons in Taiwan  exposed to arsenic in the drinking
water found a  significant excess prevalence of  skin  cancer over that of 7,500
other Taiwanese and  residents of Matsu  Island who drank water relatively free
of arsenic.  Water  supplies  in Chile and  Argentina  were also reported to be
the cause  of arsenic-induced skin cancers.   Studies of populations in the
United States  exposed  to relatively high  levels of  arsenic  in the drinking
water by  U.S.  standards  did not find any excess of skin cancer.  The  studies
were  limited,  however,  by  small  sample sizes.   Furthermore,  the level of
arsenic in  the water was much lower than that found in Taiwan.  In addition,
persons exposed to  arsenical  medicinals have been  shown  to  be at a risk of
skin  cancer.   Using  the International Agency for  Research on Cancer  (IARC)
classification  scheme  for  evaluating  carcinogens,  the  evidence  for arsenic  as
a  human  carcinogen  is considered sufficient.   This  is  evidenced by the high
relative  risks,  the consistency  in  findings  in different studies,  and  the
specificity of tumor sites (i.e., skin  and lungs).
 013AS6/A                       >       5-148                        June  1983

-------
     There is inadequate  evidence,  either positive or negative, to evaluate
the carcinogenic effect of  arsenic  compounds in animals.  All of the animal
studies are summarized in Table 5-20.  One study (Ivankovic et al. 1979), did
report positive tumorigenie  response  in  BDIX rats  by intratracheal  instilla-
tion of a  "Bordeaux"  mixture (which contains 4% calcium arsenate).  Because
arsenic was only part of the mixture, however,  it  cannot be concluded that  it
was the causative  agent.   Thus,  to  date, no animal model of the carcinogeni-
city of arsenic has been found.
5.2.1.5.2  Quantitative summary.   Unit risks are  estimated for both air and
water exposures to arsenic.  The air estimates  were based on data obtained  in
five  separate  studies involving three independently  exposed  worker  popula-
tions. Linear  and  quadratic dose response models  in  both  the absolute and
relative form are fitted to the worker data.   It was found that for the models
that fit  the  data  at the P = .01 or better level  that the corresponding unit
                                    -4             -2
risk estimates  ranged from  1.05 x 10   to 1.36  x 10   .   However linear models
fit better than  quadratic  models  and absolute  better  than  relative  models.
Also it was  felt  that exposure to trivalent arsenic was more represent!'ve of
low environmental  exposure  than  pentavalent arsenic.   Restricting unit risk
estimates to  those obtained  from linear  absolute models  where exposure was  to
                                              -3            -3
trivalent arsenic  gives a  range  of  1.25  x  10   to 7.6 x 10  .  A weighted
average of the  five  estimates in this range  gave a composite estimate of 4.29
x 10"3.
     An extensive  drinking  water  study  of the association between arsenic in
well water and  an  examination  for skin cancer of a population who lived in a
rural area of Taiwan was used to estimate the unit risk  for ingestion.  Using
the male population who appeared to  be more susceptible, it was estimated that
the unit risk associated with drinking water contaminated with 1 ug/£ of arsenic

013AS6/A                             5-149                       June 1983

-------
            -4
was 4.3 x 10  .   To compare the air and water unit risks, the exposure units in



both cases were converted  to mg/kg/day absorbed doses, resulting in unit  risk



estimates of 50.1 and 15.0, respectively.



     The potency  of arsenic compared to  other  carcinogens is evaluated  by



noting that an arsenic  potency of 2.25 x  10    (mMol/kg/day)"1 lies in the



first quartile of the 52 suspect carcinogens that have been evaluated by  CAG.



5.2.1.5.3  Conclusions.   Skin cancer and lung cancer have been shown by numerous



epidemiologic studies to have  an  association with arsenic exposure.   Arsenic



has not been found to be a carcinogen in animal  studies,  however.   In applying



the IARC criteria for evaluating a substance as to the weight  of evidence for



human carcinogenicity, arsenic would be placed in group  1, which IARC charac-



terizes as "carcinogenic to humans".



     Using the linear absolute  risk model, the  composite estimate for cancer

                                         3

risk due to a lifetime exposure to 1 |jg/m  trivalent arsenic in the air is es-



timated to be 4.29 x 10   .   The unit risk due to lifetime exposure to 1 ug/£ of


                                                       -4
arsenic in drinking  water  is  estimated to be 4.3 x  10  .   On the basis  of



mg/kg/day absorbed dose, the unit risk slopes estimates  for air and water are



50.1 and 15, respectively.  While it is unlikely that the  true risks would be



higher than these estimates,  they could be substantially lower.   Compared to



other compounds  on a mole unit basis, the carcinogenic potency for arsenic falls



towards the lower end of the first quartile.



5.2.1.6  Arsenic Mutagenesis—Both i_n  vivo and  iji vitro mutagenic responses



have been  shown  for tri-  and  pentavalent inorganic  arsenic (Arsenic, NAS,



1977; Pershagen and  Vahter,  1979;  WHO, 1981).  In vivo  and ijn vitro chromo-



somal effects are tabulated  in Table 5-39, while Table 5-40 summarizes other



indicators of arsenic effects.



     A 1977 report  (Beckman et al. ,  1977)  focused on the possible association



of exposure to arsenic and the occurrence of chromosome aberrations in workers.



013AS6/A                             5-150                       June 1983

-------
o
I—I
00

co
           Study
                                   TABLE  5-39.   CHROMOSOMAL  EFFECTS  OF  INORGANIC ARSENIC  IN MAN AND ANIMALS
     Agent
    Cytological System
                         Effects
                          Reference
3
fD
<£>
00
        Chromosomal
          aberrations
          in vivo
        Chromosomal
          aberrations
          in vivo
        Chromosomal
          aberrations
          in vivo
        Sister chroma-
          tid exchange
          frequency (SCE)
          jri vivo

        Chromosomal
          aberrations
          in vivo
Arsenite and
  possibly arsenate
Fowler's
  solution
Arsenic triox-
  ide and other
  toxic agents
Fowler's
  solution
Arsenic triox-
  ide and other
  possible toxi-
  cants
Lymphocytes from 14 psoria-
  sis patients given Fowler's
  solution and vine-growers.
Lymphocytes from 8 psoria-
  sis patients
Lymphocytes
  workers
from 9 smelter
Lymphocytes from 6 psoria-
  sis patients treated with
  Fowler's solution
Lymphocytes from 39
  smelter workers having
  variable air arsenic
  exposure
Chromatid breaks,
  gaps, acentric
  fragments and
  secondary construc-
  tions far above
  controls

Highly significant
  increases in fre-
  quency of gaps
  and breaks.  No
  difference in SCE
  frequency

Frequency of gaps,
  chromatid and
  chromosome aber-
  rations signifi-
  cantly above that
  of controls

SCE frequency
  significantly
  elevated vs.
  controls

Frequency of
  aberrations
  significantly
  higher than
  controls, no
  correlation with
  exposure levels
                                            Petres et al.,
                                              1977
                                            Nordenson et
                                              al., 1979
Beckman et
  al., 1977
                                            Burgdorf et
                                              al., 1977
                                            Nordenson et
                                              al., 1978

-------
                                                          TABLE  5-39.   (continued)
o
>—>
CO
oo
ro
   Study
     Agent
                                                   Cytological  System
                                       Effects
                        Reference
 en
 I
 en
 r>o
       Chromosomal
         effects
         in vivo
       Chromosomal
         effects i_n
         vitro

       Chromosomal
         effects
         in vitro
Chromosomal
  effects
  iji vitro


Chromosomal
  effects
  in vitro
                    Arsenic (III)
                      Oxide
                    Potassium
                      arsenite

                    Sodium arsenate
                      or arsenite
Sodium arsenate
                           Arsenate or
                             arsenite in
                             several chemical
                             forms
                     Bone marrow cells
                       and spermatogonia
                     Human peripheral
                       lymphocytes


                     Human diploid fibroblasts
                       and leukocytes
Human peripheral
  lymphocytes
                     Human leukocytes and
                       skin fibroblasts
No chromatid or
  chromosomal
  aberrations, 48 hr.
  after single i.p.
  injection.
Gaps, breaks, and
  diGentries.

Frequency of chromatid
  breaks greater than
  controls, arsenite
  more effective than
  arsenate
Chromosome pulveriza-
  tion with reduced
  number of mitotic
  cells.
Chromosome-breaki ng
  activity in both
  leukocytes and
  fibroblasts greater
  for trivalent than
  pentavalent arsenic.
                                                        Poma et al. ,
                                                          1981
                                                        Oppenheim and
                                                          Fishbein, 1965


                                                        Paton and
                                                          Allison,
                                                          1972
Petres and
  Hundieker,
  1968

Ndkamuro and
  Sayato, 1981
  c
  =3
  (V
  wo
  00
  CO

-------
                 TABLE  5-40.   SUMMARY  OF  STUDIES INVESTIGATING  ARSENIC-INDUCED MUTAGENIC  EFFECTS
o
t—•
CO
CO
ro
en
to
c
3
rt>

Study
Point
mutation
Point
mutation
Point
mutation
Agent Cytological System
Sodium
arsenate
Sodium arsenate
and arsenite
Sodium arsenite
E. coli
B. subtil is and
E. coli
E. coli
~~V79~~
Effects
No reversions seen
Both salts mutagenic,
arsenite greater
effect than arsenate
No effects
Reference
Fiscor and
Piccolo,
Nishioka,
1975
Rossman et
1980

1972
al.,
           Dominant  lethal
             effects
           DNA  repair
          DNA repair
Sodium arsenite
Sodium arsenate
Sodium arsenite
ICR-SP, mice
Human epidermal
  cells, xenon
  lamp exposure

UV-irradiated
  E.  coli
           Lymphocyte          Sodium arsenate     Human peripheral
            transformation                          lymphocytes
Acute dosing (250 mg/kg  Sram and
  negative; chronic        Bencko, 1974
  (10 mg/1 water) dosing
  positive for dominant
  lethality
Decrease in DNA dark
  repair and DNA
  synthesis
Jung, 1969
Jung and
Trachsel,  1970
Decreased mutation       Rossman et al.,
  frequency of irra-     1977
  diated cells deficient
  for excision repair;
  no effect for post-
  replication repair
                                        Inhibition of
                                          thymidine incorpo-
                                          ration into DNA
                                             Petres et al.,
                                               1977
                                               Baron et al.,
                                               1975
00
CO

-------
These preliminary data were obtained from the city of Umea.  Several kinds of
chromosomal aberrations were studied in cultured human lymphocytes from study
subjects.   The  aberrations  studied were  gaps,  chromatid  aberrations,  and
chromosome aberrations.  In a preliminary analysis of the data, the frequency
of all aberrations  constituted  8.7  percent of all  cells  examined for exposed
subjects and 1.3 percent for controls and was significantly higher in workers
than controls.   Also, all three individual types of aberrations were found to
be significantly higher  in  exposed  workers as compared to control subjects.
     A later study  by Nordenson et al. (1978) looked at this suggestive asso-
ciation in a more  detailed  manner.   The health center at Ronnskar collected
blood samples obtained from  a group  of workers stratified by degree of arsenic
exposure as well as from other recently employed workers.   No specification of
the procedures  used to recruit study subjects was provided in the paper.   Data
on age, time of employment,  smoking habits and other possible exposures were
collected after the  cytogenetic  analysis.   The health center then stratified
the subjects into 3 exposure groups  (high,  medium,  and low) based on information
concerning the  kind of work  with arsenic, duration  of  exposure, systemic
perforations and "arsenic burns".   Urinary arsenic values were available for
all but the  recently employed group.   A relatively  undefined  control  group
consisting of  apparently  healthy males from  Umea  was  also involved in the
study.
     The workers only  totaled  39 people and were not evenly distributed over
the 4 exposure  groups.   Further complicating the interpretation of the data is
the fact that  the  age distribution  was not  uniform,  with the high exposure
group being  on  the  average  20 years older  than  the other groups.  The fre-
quency of  all  aberrations was higher in all  worker-exposure categories than
for the control  group  (range 0.048 to 0.092  aberrations/cell  in exposed to

013AS6/A                             5-154                       June 1983

-------
0.016 in control subjects).  All three kinds of aberrations were significantly
higher in the  exposed workers as opposed to the control group.   The observed
correlation between  frequency of aberrations and arsenic  exposure,  however,
was not  very good.   Recently  employed workers  had a  higher frequency than did
low exposed  longer-term workers.  A good correlation  was  demonstrated only
between chromosome aberrations and arsenic exposure.   The effect of smoking on
chromosomal aberrations  was examined  in  concert with an assessment  of  arsenic
exposure.  No  isolated  effect of smoking was  observed;  however, the authors
suggested the possibility of a synergistic effect occurring.
     Chromosome studies were made on 34 patients at  the University of Frieburg
skin clinic  (Petres  et  al., 1977).  Thirteen of these  patients  had  had inten-
sive arsenic therapy,  some more than 20 years before the experiment; most of
these were psoriasis patients.   The control group (21 patients) consisted of
14 psoriasis patients  and 7 eczema patients,  none of  whom had had  arsenic
treatment.   Phytohemagglutinin-stimulated  lymphocyte cultures were  prepared
from each patient for evaluation of chromosomal aberrations.  The incidence of
aberrations was  remarkably greater in the cultures  of patients who had been
treated with arsenic.  Expressed as the frequency per 1,000 mitoses, 49 versus
12 secondary constrictions, 51 versus 7 gaps, 26 versus 1  "other" lesions, and
65 versus 2  broken  chromosomes were seen in the arsenic and  control groups,
respectively.  The  study of Nordenson et al. (1979)  supports  the above obser-
vations.   Although  SCE  frequency was  altered  in the Burgdorf et al. study,
this was not confirmed in the Nordenson et al.  report.
     Both arsenate  and  arsenite  appear  to  impair DNA repair processes in
E. coli  (Rossman et  al., 1977) and human epidermal   cells  (Jung et al., 1969)
after UV  irradiation, while arsenate  inhibits  human  lymphocyte  transformation
via retardation  of thymidine  incorporation  into DNA (Petres  et al. ,  1977;
Baron et al., 1975).
013AS6/A                             5-155                       June 1983

-------
     Support for  an  i_n vivo mutagenic effect of inorganic arsenic on chromo-
somes arises from HI vitro data (Table  5-39).   In particular,  Petres et al.
(1977) noted that the same chromosome changes were seen when lymphocyte cul-
tures from  healthy  subjects were exposed to  arsenate  at  0.1 to 500 ug As/ml
culture.
     The ability of arsenic compounds to induce gene mutations in bacteria and
mammalian cells  has  been investigated (Fiscor  and  Piccolo,  1972; Nishioka,
1975; Rossman et  al.,  1980).   However, the results are inconclusive at this
time.
     Taken  collectively,  the data on  chromosomal  effects,  DNA repair, and
inhibition  of  nucleic acid  synthesis  suggests  that arsenic  is genotoxic.
5.2.2  Non-Carcinogenic Chronic Effects
5.2.2.1  Neurotoxic Effects—Arsenic neurotoxicity, including both peripheral
and central nervous  system injury,  has long been recognized as being associ-
ated with acute, sub-acute, and chronic exposures to relatively high levels of
inorganic arsenic.   These have  been  well  characterized  as to  their major
pathophysiological features, clinical  course,  sequelae and associated histo-
pathology.
     Reynolds (1901)  provided  one  of the earliest  detailed  descriptions  of
arsenic-induced neurotoxic effects  in his report on the clinical assessment of
more than 500 patients who had consumed arsenic-contaminated beer.
     Neurological involvement started  with  sensory changes,  e.g., paresthe-
sias,  hyperesthesias,  and  neuralgias,  accompanied by  considerable  muscle
tenderness.   Varying  degrees  of motor weakness, progressing  from distal  to
proximal  muscle groups,  also occurred  and culminated at times in  paralysis  of
affected muscle groups or extremities.   Certain indications of central  nervous
system (CNS) damage,  e.g.,  loss of memory and general  mental  confusion, were

013AS6/A                             5-156                       June 1983

-------
also observed but were discounted by Reynolds (1901) as being less likely due
to arsenic than  chronic  alcoholism  or concurrent excessive selenium intake.
     Peripheral   nervous  system  (PNS)  effects similar to  those  described  by
Reynolds (1901)  have  since  been observed in numerous other  cases  of acute,
subacute, and chronic  arsenic  exposures  (Silver and Wainman,  1952; Mizuta et
al., 1956; Heyman et al. , 1956;  Jenkins,  1966;  Hara et al., 1968; Chhuttani  et
al., 1967; Ishinishi et al., 1973; Nakamura et al., 1973;  Nagamatsu and Igata,
1975; O'Shaughnessy and Kraft,  1976; Frank, 1976; Garb and Hine, 1977;  LeQuesne
and  McLeod,  1977)  and are  now recognized as classic clinical  symptoms  of
arsenic poisoning.   Such  symptoms  include peripheral sensory effects charac-
terized by the appearance of numbness, tingling, or  "pins  and needles" sensa-
tions in the hands  and feet, as well as decreases in touch, pain, and tempera-
ture sensations  in a  symmetrical  distribution.  These symptoms are often
variously accompanied  by burning sensations, sharp  or  shooting pains, and
marked  muscle  tenderness in the extremities.   Peripheral  neuritis symptoms
originate distally  and,  over  the course of  a few weeks,  often  progressively
become  more widespread in both  lower and  upper  extremities, usually  appearing
first in the feet and later in the hands.
     Collectively,   the  above  components of  the classical  clinical syndrome
associated with  excessive arsenic  exposure are highly indicative of progres-
sive peripheral  polyneuropathy,  involving both  sensory and motor nerves,  and
most intensively affecting long-axon neurons.   In addition, biopsy and autopsy
studies have provided  histopathological  evidence verifying peripheral nerve
damage, especially Wallerian degeneration of long-axon myelinated nerve fibers
in cases of human arsenic exposure where frank  neurological signs and symptoms
were manifested (Heyman,  et al., 1956; Jenkins,  1966; Chhuttani, et al.,  1967;
Ohta, 1970;  LeQuesne and McLeod, 1977).

013AS6/A                             5-157                       June 1983

-------
     The pattern of  development  of peripheral neuropathic effects is closely
associated with the  type  of exposure.   Acute exposure to a single, high dose
of arsenic can  produce  a  fairly rapid onset  of  both motor dysfunctions and
paresthesias.  In one report the onset was within 10 days (LeQuesne and McLeod,
1977) after  exposure.   Slow, incomplete  recovery  is usually seen in these
cases.
     Under more chronic occupational  exposure conditions to lower levels of
arsenic compounds, the development of neuropathy symptoms can be more gradual
and insidious, and not only bilateral,  but unilateral polyneuropathies without
motor paralysis have  been  reported (Ishinishi et  al. 1973;  Nakamura et al.,
1973).   Again, the time course  for recovery  from  the neuropathies, once in-
duced,  tends  to be  slow and on the order of  years.  Gradual onsets of peri-
pheral  neuropathies and slow recoveries have  also  been reported with subacute
or chronic exposures  to arsenic  via ingestion of contaminated soy sauce (Mizuta
et al., 1956) or  anti-asthmatic  herbal  preparations containing arsenic tri-
oxide or arsenic sulfide (Tay and Seah,  1975).
     It is difficult  to determine  the levels of arsenic associated with the
induction of  peripheral  neuropathies.   For  subacute or  chronic  poisoning
situations,   information has been  provided  in only  a few  studies  by which
effective exposure parameters can  be  estimated.   Mizuta et  al.  (1956),  for
example, reported that  peripheral  neuropathies  occurred in 20 percent of 220
patients of  all age  groups poisoned by ingestion of arsenic-contaminated soy
sauce,  with  approximately  3 mg arsenic (likely as  calcium arsenate) estimated
to be ingested  daily  for  2-3 weeks resulting in total effective doses up to
approximately 60 mg.  Also,  Tay  and Seah  (1975) reported polyneuropathies  in
approximately 50 percent of 74 patients poisoned by  daily ingestion of 3.3 or
10.3 mg/day of arsenic trioxide  or arsenic sulfide in anti-asthmatic medicinal
pills.
013AS6/A                             5-158                       June 1983

-------
     More subtle peripheral  neurotoxic  effects arising from chronic exposure
to lower levels of arsenic in occupational or non-occupational groups are more
difficult to establish,  particularly as  indexed by abnormal electromyographic
or nerve  conduction velocity  findings.   In one such  study,  Landau et al.
(1977)  reported  relationships between length  and  intensity of occupational
arsenic exposure (mainly to arsenic trioxide via inhalation) of smelter workers
and alterations in peripheral nerve functioning.   The manner in which the data
were  reported,  however,  precludes  precise  characterization of dose-effect/
dose-response relationships.
     In their study of arsenic in the drinking water of residents from Millard
County, Utah,  Southwick  et al.  (1981) conducted neurological examinations on
all study participants 47  years of  age and younger (see Section  5.2.1.2.2 for
discussion of  the  total  study population).   Neurological  examination  revealed
that  conduction  velocities for nerves  studied (ulnar motor, median  motor,
ulnar  sensory,  median  sensory,  peroneal, sural) did  not  vary significantly
with respect to  age or community.  In those individuals that exhibited below
normal conduction velocities, a slightly greater proportion was seen in exposed
participants -- 12 percent of 67 controls versus 16 percent of 83 exposed.  The
sural nerve seemed most often to be affected even after adjusting by a correction
factor of 1.8  m/s/degree in  individuals who had nerve temperatures below 30°
C.  (Velocities  below  37 m/s at 30° C  or above were  considered  abnormal).
Slowing of sural nerve conduction was reported equally in  exposed and  control
participants.   Nerve conduction velocities  regressed against annual  arsenic
dose and the log of the dose showed no significant associations.
     Similar difficulties  have  been encountered in attempts  to  characterize
dose-effect/dose-response  relationships  for  arsenic-induced peripheral nerve
functional deficits  (as  demonstrated by electromyographic recording  tech-
niques) in studies  of  two  other populations chronically exposed  to arsenic:
013AS6/A                             5-159                       June 1983

-------
(1) a  population  of Yellowknife Canadian  Indians  exposed via occupational
contact with arsenic in  a  gold mining and smelting facility,  or,  in the  case
of the families of such workers, via arsenic emissions from the facility into
the ambient environment (Canadian Public Health Assoc., 1978); and  (2) a Nova
Scotia population exposed,  via  geological  arsenic  contamination  of wells,  to
levels >0.05 ppm arsenic in drinking water (Hindmarsh, et al.  1977).
     Several of the clinical  reports discussed above not only document peri-
pheral nerve damage but  also  contain descriptions  of arsenic-induced central
nervous system (CMS) disturbances or encephalopathy effects ranging in severity
from memory losses  and  general  mental confusion to convulsions,  stupor,  coma
and even death  (Heyman et  al. 1956;  Jenkins, 1966:  Frank,  1976; Nagamatsu  and
Igata, 1975; O'Shaughnessy  and  Kraft,  1976; Garb and Mine, 1977).   The onset
and courses of such CMS effects have not been well  defined, but they appear to
closely parallel the development of peripheral neuropathy effects.  Cases of
prolonged encephalopathy indexed  by electroencephalogram (EEC) recordings of
abnormal  brain  wave patterns  up to  a year  after cessation of exposure have
been  reported  (Freeman  and Couch,  1978;  Bental  et al.  1961). Such  effects
appear to be a much less constant feature of arsenic-induced neurotoxic effects
in adults than are peripheral neuropathies.
     Certain  studies  suggest, in contrast,  that children may be  more sus-
ceptable to arsenic-induced CNS damage.  For example, severe CNS deficits  have
been  observed  in  children  exposed  for  several  months as babies  to  arsenic-
contaminated powdered milk  formulas  in Morinaga, Japan (Hamamoto,  1955; Okamura,
et al. 1956;  Yamashita,  et al.  1972;  Masahiki  and Hideyasau,  1973; Japanese
Pediatric Society, 1973).   Follow-up studies on the children exposed to arsenic
as infants  have revealed (1)  increased  incidence of severe hearing loss (>30 dB)
in 18 percent of 415 children examined compared to less  than  1 percent inci-
dence  of hearing  loss  in  corresponding  age group children;   (2)  increased
013AS6/A                             5-160                       June  1983

-------
incidence of abnormal electroencephalographic (EEC) brain wave patterns in 14
percent of the  exposed  children,  more than double the expected rate for com-
parable normal  pediatric populations; and  (3) observations of increased inci-
dences of persisting  mental  retardation,  epilepsy, and other indications of
severe brain damage.
     In another  study (Bencko  and Syman,  1977),  hearing  losses  in children
were reported to be associated with arsenic exposure derived from  emissions
from a  nearby  coal-fired  power plant combusting  high-arsenic  content coal.
Both air and bone conduction hearing losses were  observed, suggesting  inner
ear damage.  Failure  to find analogous hearing losses in children exposed to
atmospheric arsenic emitted from a copper smelter in the United States (Milham,
1977) has raised questions  regarding arsenic-induced damage to the inner ear
in children.
     Very few  animal  toxicology  studies  have  focussed on investigation of
neurotoxic effects  of arsenic  on  the CNS.  Rozenshtein  (1970),  for example,
reported evidence  of  CNS  functional  deficits,  as  indexed  by  altered condi-
tioned reflexes, as well as histopathologic evidence of CNS structural damage,
e.g,.  pericellular  edema and neuronal cytolysis in  the brain, in  rats exposed
for three months to an arsenic trioxide aerosol resulting in an arsenic con-
centration of 46 ug/m .   Similar  but less  severe  effects were also obtained
with exposure of other  rats  to a  3.7 pg As/m  aerosol.   CNS deficits, indexed
by impaired avoidance conditioning in the  absence  of demonstrable  histopatho-
logic changes in brain  tissue,  were also reported (Osato, 1977) for suckling
rats administered 2 or 10 mg arsenic trioxide via stomach intubation over a 40
day period.
5.2.2.2  Cardiovascular Effects—A  specific  cardiovascular effect  is  the
so-called Blackfoot disease, a peripheral  vascular disease leading to gangrene
of the toes, feet,  legs and fingers.  This disease has been reported in the
013AS6/A                             5-161                       June 1983

-------
area of  Taiwan,  where  exposure to inorganic arsenic  via  drinking  water is
known to  occur.   The same population  used  for studies on skin  cancer  and
hyperkeratosis (as discussed in the section on skin cancer) was also used for
investigating the occurrence of  Blackfoot disease (Tseng et al. 1968, Tseng
1977).   The total prevalence of  Blackfoot disease was lower than the preva-
lence of skin cancer, but higher in the younger age groups (Table 5-41).  The
overall  prevalence rate  for  Blackfoot  disease  was 0.9-1.2 percent for males
and 0.7 percent for females  after age 39.
     A group of  1108 patients  with Blackfoot disease  from  the endemic area
were identified  during  1958  to 1975 (Tseng, 1977).   There were 669 males and
439 females.  Patients  were  included in the series if they had  1) objective
             TABLE 5-41.   PREVALENCE OF BLACKFOOT DISEASE (per 1000)
                       BY AGE AND ARSENIC EXPOSURE (ppm)
Arsenic content
of drinking water
(ppm)



<0.3
0.3 - 0.6
>0.6
20-39
4.5
13.2
14.2
Age
40-59
10.5
32.0
46.9
>60
20.3
32.2
61.4
Source:  Adapted from Tseng, 1977.

signs  of  ischemia and  2) subjective symptoms  of  ischemia.   Follow-up was
attempted using  a  variety of methods to  trace  the subjects.  At the end of
follow-up, 528 patients had died, a fatality rate of 47.7 percent.
     A  history  of typical  ischemic symptoms such  as  numbness  was used to
estimate the date of onset of Blackfoot disease.  Duration of intake of arsenic
water  at  the  time  of  onset represents  the period of time between first use  of

013AS6/A                             5-162                       June 1983

-------
such  intake  and the time of onset  of  the disease.   Duration o_f  intake  o£
arsenical water  represents  the duration  of time during which  the  patient
started drinking artesian well  water up to the  time  of  survey  or up to  the
time of change of source of drinking water.   For native patients,  the duration
is estimated  to  be  equivalent  to their ages, but for patients who came from
areas without artesian  wells the  duration was counted as  starting  from  the
year of arrival.
     A classification system of percentage of permanent disability was created
and each patient was assigned to the appropriate category.
     It was determined  (determination  not specified) that all patients with
Blackfoot disease had consumed  artesian well water before the onset of disease,
and none of  the residents of the endemic area who had consumed surface water
or water from shallow wells developed Blackfoot disease.
     In some parts of the arsenic endemic area, a new source of drinking water
was provided in 1956.  The incidence of Blackfoot disease was therefore examined
in year  of  onset periods (1955 and before, 1956-1965, and 1966-1975).  There
were  no  cases  of Blackfoot disease among area residents who were born after
the tap  water supply was  instituted  in  1956.   Furthermore, as the duration  of
intake of arsenical  water increased (across all  3 exposure levels) the inci-
dence of Blackfoot  disease  increased.   In  addition,  the degree of permanent
disability of patients was significantly correlated with duration of intake of
arsenical water at time of onset of the disease.
     There are  also  data indicating that other substances may be involved in
the etiology  of  Blackfoot disease.   Lu  et al., (1977,  1978)  found fluorescent
compounds in  water  samples  from an area with  endemic  Blackfoot disease.  Of
the compounds discovered, tentative  identifications of D-lysergic acid and/or
013AS6/A                             5-163                       June 1983

-------
ergometrine, ergotamine and calciferol  have  been made (Irgolic,  1982).  These
substances may have been at least contributing factors to this disease, since
some of them, or similar compounds,  are known vasoactive agents.
     Vascular changes were  also  noted among persons  living  in  Antofagasta,
Chile.   (The study groups have been mentioned in the  section on skin cancer.)
Raynauds syndrome and acrocyanosis  were reported to  occur in 30 and 27 per-
cent, respectively, in  a  group  of 100 persons studied by Borgono and Greiber
(1972).
     Raynauds syndrome  has also been reported to occur among German vintners.
Butzengeiger (1940) studied 180  persons and found that 22.8 percent had evidence
of vascular  disorders  of  the  extremities.  Butzengeiger  (1949)  studied 192
vinegrowers and found that 28.7 percent had ECG changes.  There was, however,
no control group.
     In epidemiological studies of  smelters,  peripheral  vascular disease has
generally  not  been found.  However, mortality  studies  indicate that there
might be  some cardiovascular  effects,  although study results have been con-
flicting.  Thus, Axelson et  al.  (1978) found a higher mortality in cardiovas-
cular disease,  but analysis of the data indicate that if such an effect occurred
it probably needed higher exposure levels than those causing lung cancer.   The
study by  Ott et  al.  (1974) indicated,  on  the  other hand, that the arsenic
exposed workers had less mortality than expected.
     In both the  original  Lee and Fraumeni (1969) report  and  in the follow-up
study by Lee-Feldstein (1982), cardiovascular mortality was found to be signi-
ficantly elevated--SMR=118 and SMR=129, respectively  (p <0.01)--but not related
to duration  of  arsenic  exposure.   In  the  Higgins et  al.  (1982)  study  on  the
Anaconda  smelter  workers, cardiovascular  disease  mortality  increased  with
increasing ceiling arsenic exposure among smokers, but not among nonsmokers--at

013AS6/A                             5-164                       June 1983

-------
500-4999 ug/m3, SMR=165**  for smokers (p <0.01), SMR=100 for nonsmokers; at
>5000  ug/m  ,  SMR=182** for smokers  (p  <0.01),  SMR=166 for nonsmokers.  In
contrast, Lubin ot al. (1981) did not find an excess in cardiovascular disease
mortality (SMR=108)  in  their  study cohort of workers  from the same smelter.
The cohorts in all four of these studies were slightly different.
     The conflicting  findings  of these reports suggest that the relationship
between arsenic exposure  and  cardiovascular disease is quite complex  and in
need of additional research.
5.2.2.3  Teratogenesis and Developmental Effects
5.2.2.3.1  Animal  studies.  In a recent review of the toxicological effects of
prenatal exposure  to arsenic, Hood  (1982) aptly  discussed  the  considerable
number of variables  that  influence effects on  offspring of maternal arsenic
exposure during pregnancy.   Included in his list of variables were the forms
of arsenic administered, species and individual differences in susceptibility,
dose level  and exposure route,  peak  level  attained  in  the conceptus, maternal
metabolism  and excretion,  and  timing of  exposure  during gestation, the length
of  the list indicative of the complex  nature  of arsenic  toxicity induced
during prenatal exposure.
     As noted  by  Hood,  teratogenic effects of  arsenic compounds  at least at
relatively  high exposure  levels,  have been demonstrated in a  number of animal
species.  Studies  by Ridgeway  and  Karnofsky  (1952),  for example,  demonstrated
no gross abnormalities in chick embryos following injection of sodium arsenate
into embryonate eggs  at 0.20  mg  As/egg on  day 4 of  gestation.  Retardation  in
body weight gain  and feather growth, as well as certain other abnormalities,
were, however,  observed in chickens hatched from arsenic-treated eggs.
013AS6/A                             5-165                       June 1983

-------
     Other experimental studies on  mammalian  species have demonstrated tera-
togenic effects of  arsenic  in  hamsters,  rats and mice.   Perm  and Carpenter
(1968) produced malformations in 15  day hamster fetuses via intravenous (I.V.)
injections of sodium arsenate into pregnant dams on  day 8 of gestation at dose
levels of 15,  17.5  or 20 mg/kg body weight.   The  variety of malformations
obtained with  prenatal arsenic exposure of hamsters -- including exencephaly,
encephaloceles, skeletal  defects  and  genitourinary  system defects and the
effects of other related experimental manipulations, e.g., protective  effects
of co-treatment with selenium - are  reviewed in a later report by Perm (1977).
     WiUnite  (1981)  injected  arsenate (20 mg/kg) or  arsenite  (2-10  mg/kg)
into pregnant golden hamsters at day 8 of gestation  and observed axial skeletal
disorders in  offspring—cranioschisis  aperta with  exencephaly and cranio-
schesis occulta--while 10 hours after dosing,  embryos showed a delay in neural -
fold  elevation  and  neural  tube closure with  arsenate  exposure.   Methylated
arsenic was  not teratogenic, even at a dose of 100 mg/kg.
     Teratogenic and  embryotoxic effects of prenatal arsenic exposure  of mice
have also been  reported  (Hood  and Bishop,  1972; Hood and Pike, 1972;  Hood et
al., 1977).    Increased fetal  resorption,  decreased  fetal weights and various
malformations  (such  as exencephaly, micrognathia,  agnathia, exophthalmos,
anophthalmia,  hydroencephaly,  cleft  lip, ectrodactyly, micromelia,  fused ver-
tebrae and  forked  ribs)  were  observed following single I.P. injections of
sodium arsenate (45  mg As/kg body weight) in Swiss-Webster  mice  (the  single
injection occurring  on one  day between days 6 and 12 of gestation) (Hood and
Bishop, 1972).  Co-treatment with BAL reduced arsenic associated malformations
(Hood and Pike, 1972; Hood et al.  1977).
013AS6/A                             5-166                       June 1983

-------
     Many similar embryotoxic and fetal teratogenic effects, along with other
effects (renal and  gonaual  agenesis),  have also been observed following I.P.
injections of  sodium arsenate  in  pregnant rats  (Beaudoin,  1974;  Burk and
Beaudoin, 1977), again  at relatively high dose  levels  (e.g.,  30 mg/kg body
weight).
     The above studies  are  suggestive  of significant effects on reproduction
and development of mammalian species being induced by prenatal arsenic exposure.
However, only  very  minimal  effects,  or  none at  all on fetal  development,  have
been observed in studies on chronic oral exposure of pregnant rat or mice dams
to  relatively  low  levels of arsenic via  the  drinking water (Schroeder and
Mitchener, 1971).   Nadeyenko, et al., (1978)  reported that  intubation  of  rats
with arsenic solution at a dose level of 0.0025 mg/kg for a period of 7 months,
including pregnancy, produced no significant embryotoxic effects and only very
infrequent slight expansion of  ventricles  of  the cerebrum,  renal pelvises and
urinary bladder.   Also, Hood et al.  (1977) reported that very high single oral
doses of  arsenate  solutions (120 mg/kg) to pregnant  rats  were necessary to
cause prenatal fetal toxicity,  while multiple doses of  60 mg/kg  on  3  days had
little  effect.   This report suggests that  the higher  doses  required with  oral
versus  parenteral exposure  relate to the more rapid methylation  to  less toxic
forms of  oral  arsenic  owning to its initial passage through the liver, where
methylation may occur.
     Animal studies on the effects of early postnatal administration of arsenic
compounds on growth and  development  have generally failed to yield  any signi-
ficant  positive  results  at  sublethal arsenic  dose levels.   Tamura  (1978), for
example, reported no effects on the growth and development of postnatal rats
fed arsenic trioxide in their diet from the 7th to 21st day following birth at
013AS6/A                             5-167                       June 1983

-------
a dose level of 1.5 mg/kg/day,  in comparison to a 50 percent mortality  rate  at
a 15.0 mg/kg body weight dose.   Similarly,  Ferslew and Edds  (1979)  observed  no
significant effects  on  growth  or development  of  young  swine fed arsanilic
acids at 0.01% concentration for 31 days commencing at 3 weeks of age,  despite
observations of  significant alterations by organo-arsenic of white blood cell
counts, serum  alkaline  phosphatase  activity,  and other blood chemistry para-
meters and significant increases of arsenic in various soft  tissues and urine.
In another  study (Heywood  and  Sortwell, 1979), both  3.75 and 7.5 mg/kg/day
doses of an arsenic  compound  fed to adolescent or  infant rhesus monkeys re-
sulted in mortality  in  most of the  exposed animals, but  no  notable effects  in
growth or development of animals  surviving the dosing period.  Unfortunately,
the lack of experimental data in  the above studies  on the effects  of exposure
across a range of  dose  levels, besides  the ones employed, greatly  limit their
utility in  terms of  determining possible dose-effect or dose-response rela-
tionships between postnatal arsenic exposure and induced effects on growth and
development.
     It should be noted that,  whereas some of the above animal studies provide
highly suggestive  evidence  for  arsenic effects on  reproduction  and develop-
ment, at least at high exposure levels, one cannot confidently extrapolate the
results to  estimate the probability of occurrence of similar or  analogous
effects in  man.   Still,  some suggestions of  possible  arsenic effects on human
reproduction  and development have  been derived  from certain epidemiology
studies discussed below.
5.2.2.3.2  Human studies.  Available data are mainly  from studies  in Sweden on
male and female  smelter workers.  These studies were  not designed  specifically
to study effects of  arsenic but rather  to study the effects,  in  general, of the
smelter work.  While data from these  studies  suggest a low-level effect of

013AS6/A                             5-168                       June  1983

-------
smelter pollutants on neighboring (proximate) populations, the diverse agents
involved preclude making conclusive  statements  about the  specific  effects  of
arsenic.
     Congenital  malformations were found to occur at about the same rate, 3.0
percent among women employed at the Rbnnskar smelter as among women living in
six areas belonging to  the hospital  serving the Rb'nnskar area (Nordstrom et
al. 1978c).   However, mean birthweights  were lower among  offspring to female
Ronnskar workers (Nordstrom et al.  1978a, 1978b).
     The number  of  spontaneous abortions  were also  increased among  women
working in this  smelter;  the highest rate (17 percent) was found among women
employed during  pregnancy  or who  had been  employed  prior to pregnancy and
lived close to  the  smelter.   Women working in close connection with smelting
processes had a rate of 28 percent of spontaneous abortion compared with other
female employees.  When both parents were employed the abortion  rate was 19.4
percent compared to  13.5 percent when the father was not employed.
     Studies on spontaneous abortion among women living in the vicinity of the
smelter were also conducted  (Nordstrom et al. 1978d).  In  four areas the rate
varied between  7.6  and  11.0 percent.  The  highest rate occurred in the area
closest to the  smelter,  but many women  employed at  the smelter  live  in that
area.
5.2.2.4  Hematological Effects—The hematopoietic system in man has been shown
to be  affected  by arsenic exposure in cases  of acute, subacute  or chronic
intake, taking  the  form of anemia, leukopenia, granulocytopenia and  eosino-
philia.  Such  effects appear to be  reversible,  the  system recovering in  a
matter of weeks after exposure ends.
013AS6/A                             5-169                       June 1983

-------
     Hamamoto (1955), in his  report  of infant poisoning by arsenic-contami-
nated milk in Japan,  described marked anemia and leukopenia with  lymphocytosis
in most of  a group  of 59 infant patients.   Erythropoiesis  was disturbed  in
bone marrow  of 19 children  studied.   Within a month,  the hematology appeared
to show normal values.   Similarly,  Mizuta et al.  (1956)  found blood disturb-
ances, including anemia  with  leukopenia  and lymphocytosis, in subjects sur-
veyed for ingestion  of soy  sauce contaminated with arsenic.
     Two recent  studies  dealing with acute and sub-acute  arsenic  poisoning
(Feussner et al., 1979;  Lerman  et al. 1980) have demonstrated arsenic induced
megaloblastic anemia,  Feussner et al.  (1979) demonstrating  arsenic being
present in bone marrow using electron-probe microanalysis.
     Chronic exposure to arsenic occasions hematological  effects  which resemble
those seen with  subacute exposure.   Terada (1960), in his survey of patients
exposed to arsenic in well  water contaminated by industrial activity in Niigata,
Japan, saw  anemia as  a  common  feature, with  the  anemia  being either normo-
chromic (50  percent)  or  hyperchromic  (30 percent).  In their  study  on indivi-
duals living in communities in Utah where arsenic was  present in  drinking water,
Southwick et al. (1981)  also  reported the  presence of anemia  in certain indi-
viduals; however, anemia was not significantly more prevalent in  exposed popu-
lations.  Anemia has been reported in subjects exposed to arsenic occupationally
or in medicinals (Kyle and Pease, 1965; Westhoff et al.,  1975).
     In animals, decreased  hemoglobin production has  been  seen  in rats fed
both arsenate  (Mahaffey  and Fowler,  1977) and  arsenite  (Byron et  al.,  1967)
and in cats given either form orally (Massmann and Opitz, 1954).   The study of
Woods and Fowler (1977)  in which arsenate was given orally to rats and mice at
20, 40 or 85 ppm in drinking water showed that the sites of disturbance of the
heme  biosynthetic  pathway   by  arsenate mainly  involved  depression of ALA-

013AS6/A                             5-170                       June 1983

-------
synthetase and heme synthetase activity, with elevation in the urinary levels
of chiefly uroporphyrin and also  coproporphyrin.   The increase in uroporphyrin
appears to be specific to arsenic.
5.2.2.5  Hepatic Effects—In the reports of Hamamoto (1955) and Mizuta et al.
(1956), dealing  with  arsenic  contamination  in infant milk and  soy  sauce,
respectively, swollen livers appeared to be a common clinical  feature.   Of the
children exposed to milk arsenic,  all subjects presented with  this  feature
(61/61).  In the autopsies of  fatal outcome cases,  hemorrhagic  necrosis and
fatty degeneration of the  livers were seen.  In the  survivors, liver function
tests were not very  revealing, being within normal limits in most cases.   In
both of the  above episodes,  liver size returned  to  normal  after exposure
ceased.
     Over the years,  chronic  intake of arsenic has been reported to be asso-
ciated with hepatic damage in the form of portal  hypertension, malignant liver
disease and  cirrhosis.   In the Manchester beer poisoning episode,  Reynolds
(1901)  noted  widespread liver disease  in drinkers of such  beer,  with the
extent  of the disease being related to  the amount  of arsenic  in  the beverage.
     The incidence of  hepatic  cirrhosis among German vintners  has  been re-
viewed  by Luchtrath  (1972),  who  noted that  the frequency of  liver cirrhosis
decreased with the banning of  arsenical  pesticides.  The  use  of  arsenic as  an
anti-syphilitic is also  known to be associated with hepatic cirrhosis (Baldridge,
1934).
     Non-cirrhotic portal  hypertension  has  been  infrequently noted in the
literature (Morris et  al. , 1974;  Szuler et al.,  1979).   Szuler described one
case report of presinusoidal portal hypertension in a patient taking an arsenic
antiasthmatic for 55  years.   Cirrhosis was absent and liver function was not
disturbed.

013AS6/A                             5-171                       June 1983

-------
     In the smelter study by Axel son et al.  (1978) there was a tendency towards
an  increased  mortality in  liver cirrhosis  among  arsenic-exposed workers.
5-2.2.6  Renal Effects—Functional  and/or biochemical  impairment  of the human
renal system  is  mainly known in acute poisoning  by  arsine, AsHL (Uldall  et
al., 1970;  Fowler,  1977).   Oligouria and anuria progressing to renal  failure
are common  acute  responses.   Persistent  renal sequelae in subjects surviving
the acute  stage  of arsine poisoning include  chronic renal  insufficiency and
hypertension.   Histologically,  the  injury is  mainly tubular and  interstitial.
     Acute  or  chronic renal  effects associated with  arsenate  or arsenite
exposure are  less  well  characterized.   Gerhardt et al.  (1978) have recently
described a case of acute arsenic poisoning from contaminated illicit  liquor.
Acute renal  bilateral cortical   necrosis was  diagnosed in the patient, who
survived the acute stage to eventually develop reduced renal size and cortical
calcification.
     In the clinical  survey of  Hamamoto (1955) of Japanese infants poisoned
with arsenic-contaminated milk,  possible renal injury was  diagnosed  by the
presence of hematuria, leukocyturia and glycosuria (23,7 percent, 42.3 percent
and 13.5 percent, respectively).  Reversibility of these indices was apparent,
with only  three  percent  of  the   patients  still  showing pathological  changes
after one  month.   Terada  (1960) also noted proteinuria  in  cases of arsenic
poisoning  in  Niigata,  Japan,  arising from ground water contamination from an
arsenic plant.
5.2.2.7  Respiratory  Effects Other Than Cancer—Nasal  septum perforation is  a
rapid tissue  response in workers encountering  high  airborne  arsenic  levels
(NAS, 1977; Hine et al., 1977; Lundgren,  1954).
013AS6/A                             5-172                       June 1983

-------
     In the detailed  smelter  worker study of Lundgren (1954),  1,276 subjects
                                           3
in a worksite with  levels up to 7  mg  As/m  showed two types of respiratory
disturbances relating to  the  nature of the  processing and presumably the form
of the arsenic.  Refined  arsenic handling was associated with septal perfora-
tion and  rhino-pharyngo-laryngitis  while  workers  in the roaster, furnace and
connector areas showed tracheobronchitis and signs of pulmonary insufficiency.
In the latter  group,  exposure was  mixed—including both arsenic and sulfur
dioxide.   A recent  report has suggested,  furthermore, that workplace arsenic
may also be present as the sulfide  (Smith et al.,  1976).
     Chilean children exposed to arsenic  in drinking water  (Borgono et  al.,
1977) showed a chronic cough and bronchitis history.
5.2.2.8  Immunosuppressant Effects—The role of inorganic arsenic as an immuno-
suppressant in man  is mainly  inferred  from  indirect data accumulated over the
years (Arsenic.  NAS, 1977).
     First, the  therapeutic  utility of  arsenicals, such as arsenite-based
Fowler's solution in  the  treatment of steroid-responding disorders  and  as a
lymphocytostatic agent,  suggests action as an immunosuppressant.
     Secondly,  certain  manifestations indicative of likely  immune system
disorders have been observed  with  arsenic exposure, (e.g., the occurrence of
herpes simplex and chronic pulmonary infections) and suggest a role of arsenic
as an immunosuppressant (Arsenic.   NAS, 1977).   Histories of chronic cough and
bronchitis in Chilean children exposed to arsenic  in drinking water (Borgono
et al., 1977) would tend to support such a role.
5.3  FACTORS AFFECTING ARSENIC TOXICITY
     The most widely  recognized  and studied arsenic  interactive  behavior is
with selenium, and much  of the early data has been  reviewed by Levander (1977).
013AS6/A                             5-173                       June 1983

-------
     The known antagonistic  relationship  of  arsenic and selenium in a number
of animal  species  was  first described by Moxon and co-workers  (Moxon  and
Dubois, 1939;  Dubois  et  al.,  1940),  who also demonstrated the  utility of
dietary arsenic supplementation in protecting livestock from the toxic  levels
of selenium in certain fodders.   Both penta-  and trivalent arsenic are equally
effective in protecting against selenium toxicity,  and do so regardless of the
chemical form by which selenium exposure occurs.
     An understanding of  the i_n vivo mechanisms by  which  arsenic imparts a
protective effect on selenium toxicity has only recently been gained.
     The ability of arsenic  to retard the formation of volatile selenium  in
the form of dimethyl selenide (Kanstra and Bonhorst, 1953) apparently involves
inhibition of  microsomal  methyl  transferase  activity,  an enzyme sensitive to
arsenite  (Ganther  and Hsieh,  1974).   An over-all  protective  effect still
exists, however,  since arsenic promotes  the biliary excretion of  selenium
(Levander and Baumann, 1966;  Ganther and Baumann, 1962).  According to  Levander
(1977), enhanced  biliary clearance of  selenium  in  the presence of  arsenic
probably  involves  an  excretory conjugate of both,  since selenium  likewise
enhances the biliary excretion of arsenic.
     Rb'ssner et al.  (1977) have shown a protective effect for arsenite  against
the cytotoxicity of  selenite using suspension cultures  of  mouse  fibroblasts
exposed to  these agents at  10   to  10   M.   Interestingly,  selenite in turn
had only a low protective effect against arsenite cytotoxicity.
     Little  data  exists  for interactive relationships between arsenic and
other  elements.  In  one of  the few  pertinent studies  bearing  on  this issue,
the effects  of concomitant oral exposure to cadmium,  lead and arsenic  versus
single agent exposure effects have been reported by Mahaffey and Fowler (1977).
Cadmium and  arsenic  together retarded weight gain  in  young adult  rats to a
greater extent than either element alone.
013AS6/A                             5-174                       June 1983

-------
                       6.   ARSENIC AS  AN ESSENTIAL ELEMENT

     Mertz (1970) has set forth a set  of logical  criteria which trace elements
should obey in order to be considered  physiologically essential for man and/or
animals.   One of  the most obvious of these, and one which should be readily
demonstrable, is  that  the element meet a unique requirement physiologically,
and, consequently, that  a deficiency  in that element be associated with de-
leterious effects.
     In the  case  of  arsenic,  early reports attempting to show a nutritional
requirement  for  the  element in  animals  were inconclusive (Arsenic.  NAS, 1977;
Underwood, 1977).  Part  of the problem was undoubtedly  technical  in  nature,
i.e., the  difficulty of  carrying  out  such  studies  in  an  experimental  environ-
ment where rigorous  exclusion  of  a  ubiquitous element from  the diet is  neces-
sary.  More  recently,  however,  several  carefully  controlled  studies have been
reported to  have  demonstrated nutritional essentiality for arsenic  in at least
some mammalian species.
     Nielsen  et  al.  (1978) have  noted  that deprivation  of  pregnant rats of
arsenic-supplemented  diets resulted  in offspring showing  such post-weaning
effects  as slow  growth,  enlarged  spleens, and  increased  red cell osmotic
fragility.   Greater  perinatal  mortality among pups from  arsenic-deprived dams
was  also noted in a  second experimental group.
     In a  recent  review by Uthus  et al. (1982), the authors  reported on studies
with chicks  that suggest that  arsenic  influences  arginine metabolism.  It was
reported  that arsenic deprivation influenced the  effects of dietary arginine,
manganese  and zinc,  the  fluctuations  of  which variously  affected  growth,
kidney arginase,  plasma  alkaline phosphatase,  plasma urea,  plasma uric acid
013AS1/G                             6-1                             June 1983

-------
and hematocrit.  The authors suggested that the four components interacted to
affect the conversion of arginine into urea and ornithine.
     Anke et al.  (1978) studied the nutritional requirements for arsenic using
goats and  mini-pigs  and a semi-synthetic diet  containing  less  that 50 ppb
arsenic.   Effects attributed to  arsenic  deficiency in both species were seen
not only  in the  adult animals but  in  their offspring.   Arsenic deficiency
increased the mortality of adult goats as well as altered the mineral profiles
for copper and manganese in the carcass.   Significant reproductive effects for
both arsenic-deficient  goats and mini-pigs included reduction  of  the  normal
litter size.  Furthermore, the mortality of kids and piglets from the As-defi-
cient groups was  significantly higher than controls.  Manganese levels were
elevated in As-deficient kids and piglets, but no perturbation of hematological
indices (hemoglobin,  hematocrit  or  mean  corpuscular  concentration)  was noted.
This is  in  contrast  to the experimental  observations with rats (Nielsen et
al., 1974),  where  decreased  hematocrits, elevated iron content in  spleen and
increased osmotic fragility of cells are seen.  Given the fact that the rat is
known to  be an anomalous  animal  model  for arsenic  metabolism (see  Chapter 4),
this difference is probably peculiar to this  species.
     Schwartz  (1977)  has  noted  growth effects of arsenite  on  rats fed  an
arsenic-supplemented  diet, with  an optimal effect seen  at 0.25 to 0.5 ppm.
Interestingly, this  worker noted that pentavalent arsenic as sodium arsenate
is  less effective.
     Remaining to  be independently demonstrated is  a  physiological role for
arsenic,  the existence of any specific  carrier agent in the  body,  or  arsenic
essentiality in man.
     A  feature of essential  element  metabolism  is  homeostatic control  of
levels  and movement  of a  particular  element  i_n vivo.  From  the information

013AS1/G                              6-2                            June 1983

-------
considered  earlier,  there is  no effective absorption  barrier for  most  soluble
inorganic arsenicals,  but efficient excretory mechanisms  (kidney,  hair)  and
biotransformation appear  to provide some  control over any  absorption-excretion
balance.
013AS1/G              ,               6-3                             June 1983

-------
                  7.   HUMAN HEALTH  RISK ASSESSMENT  FOR  ARSENIC

     This portion of the report places  the information  in  the earlier  Chapters
into a  quantitative  perspective with regard to  non-occupational  population
exposure and health effects of arsenic  germane  to such  a population.
     Data for levels of arsenic encountered by humans  in air, water, food and
other sources, such as cigarette smoking, were set forth in Chapter 3 and are
combined with  data on rates  of intake and rates of absorption  to  provide
information on the  total  assimilation  of arsenic on a daily  basis.   Health
effects of  arsenic  most  germane to non-occupational  population exposures are
then summarized.   Generally,  these  are chronic effects associated with long-
term intake of relatively low levels of  arsenic.  In  the case of hazardous
wastes, however,   some  health  effects of concern may be associated with acute
exposures;  therefore,  acute and sub-acute effects must also  be considered.
     The section  dealing with dose-effect/dose-response data includes conside-
ration of  various  indices of internal  exposure followed by quantitative data
for intake and population response.
     Populations   at  risk, identified at  least along qualitative lines, are
included for discussion.
7.1  AGGREGATE EXPOSURE LEVELS TO ARSENIC IN THE U.S.   POPULATION
     Among  individuals  of the general  population (not occupationally exposed
to  arsenic),  the main routes of exposure to arsenic are typically via  inges-
tion of  food and  water,  with  lesser  exposures occurring via  inhalation.
Representative intake  figures are  presented in Table  7-1.  Intake by inhala-
tion is augmented among smokers in proportion to the level of smoking.
013AS5/E                             7-1                             June 1983

-------
                TABLE  7-1.   ROUTES  OF  DAILY  HUMAN  ARSENIC  INTAKE
Route/level
Ambient air/0.006 pg/m3(a)
Drinking water/< 10 pg/liter
Food/50 pg daily (elemental As)
Cigarettes/6 pg in main-
stream smoke/pack^
Total: < 60 pg nonsmokers

Rate
20 m3
2 liters
--
1/2 pack
1 pack
2 pack

Total intake
0.12 pg
1 20 pg
50 pg
3 pg
6 pg
12 pg

Absorbed amount
0.036 pg(b)
< 20 pg(c)
40 pg(d)
0.9 pg'f^
1 R ,,n(f)
-i--y M9/-f\
2 "7 \ J
• ' M9

  ^National  average for 1981 (see Section 3.3.1)


  ^Assumes 30 percent respiratory absorption (see text).

(c)
v ^Assumes total  absorption (see text).


*• ^Assumes 80 percent absorption (see text).

(e)
v ^Assumes 20 percent of cigarette content in inhaled smoke (see text).


  ^Assumes 30 percent absorption of inhaled amount (see text).
                                               3

     Assuming a daily ventilation  rate of 20 m  ,  and  a national  population



inhalation average of 0.006 ug/m /As,  the total daily  inhalation exposure for



arsenic can be projected  to  be approximately 0.12  ug.   Assuming  30 percent



absorption, approximately  0.03  pg  of  arsenic would  be absorbed on a daily



average.
013AS5/E                             7-2                             June 1983

-------
     Contribution of  tobacco-borne arsenic to the  respiratory  burden would
depend upon the.rate  of cigarette smoking.  If one assumes a mass of 1 gram/
cigarette and an average tobacco value of 1.5 ppm, this yields 1.5 ug arsenic/
cigarette.  With  20  percent  of this amount in  mainstream  smoke,  the inhaled
amount for each pack of cigarettes would be approximately 6 ug arsenic, and of
this  amount,  40 percent  would  be deposited in the  respiratory  tract (see
Chapter 4).   Assuming  an  absorption of 75 percent of the deposited fraction,
one arrives at  an  absorption of approximately 2  ug/pack  of cigarettes or a
factor of  10  to  100 times greater  than  intake  for nonsmokers  in  given  ambient
air settings. One may  assume that the  rates of absorption  for trivalent and
pentavalent arsenic in the respiratory tract are equivalent.
     Since drinking water arsenic  is  mainly in a soluble form  (arsenate or
arsenite) virtually all of  it is absorbed in  the  GI tract (see Chapter 4).
Thus, assuming an average daily consumption of two  liters of  water containing
at most 10 ug As/liter as an outside high figure,  one can  estimate that the
total arsenic absorbed  from  drinking  water would be approximately 20 ug/day.
Most  individuals would, in reality, take  in much  less than  this  amount, while
those in the  Western  U.S.  with well water supplies much  higher in arsenic
content would assimilate proportionately more.
     Food arsenic values taken from the 1974 FDA survey indicate a daily total
dietary intake of approximately 50 ug elemental arsenic.   Based on information
presented in  Chapter 4, the  major portion (80 percent) of food arsenic would
be absorbed resulting  in  a  net daily food arsenic absorption of 40 ug total.
     Thus,  a  non-smoker would have a total daily absorption from all exposure
media of approximately 60 ug arsenic/day  or less.  Of this, the  diet would  be
013AS5/E                             7-3                             June 1983

-------
the major contributor, assuming  levels  in water much below 10 |jg/liter.   For
cigarette smokers,  one would add 2 ug arsenic/pack of cigarettes  smoked daily.
     If one views aggregate intake not in terms of total  arsenic  intake but in
terms of toxicologically  significant  forms of the element, then much of the
dietary fraction, for  reasons given earlier,  such as complex  organoarsenicals
being present, becomes relatively less  important than the forms  in water and
air  as  well  as  in  cigarette  smoke.   Arsenic forms  in such  media include:
pentavalent arsenic  in most  water supplies; variable mixtures  of tri-and
pentavalent arsenic in ambient air; and probably an arsenic oxide in cigarette
smoke.  From this view point, utilizing the examples already given above, non-
smokers would  absorb  20 ug  or less daily  of  toxicologically  significant  arse-
nic.  Heavy smokers having otherwise very low air and water exposure, conceiv-
ably could receive their major exposure via cigarettes.
7.2  SIGNIFICANT HUMAN HEALTH EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH AMBIENT EXPOSURES
7.2.1  Acute Exposure Effects
     Serious acute  effects  and  late sequelae from  exposure  to arsenic will
appear  after  single  or  short-term respiratory  or  oral  exposures to large
amounts  of  arsenic.   Available data  indicate that  inorganic trivalent  com-
pounds  of  arsenic  are generally more  acutely toxic  than  inorganic pentavalent
compounds,  which in  turn  are more  toxic than  organic  arsenic  compounds.
Serious  effects  will  also appear after  long-term  exposure to respiratory or
oral  doses of  arsenic.
      The acute symptoms  following oral exposure consist of gastrointestinal
disturbances,  which may be  so severe  that secondary  cardiovascular  effects  and
shock may  result and cause death.   Also, direct toxic  effects on the liver,
bloodforming  organs,  the  central and peripheral  nervous systems,  and  the
 013AS5/E                              7-4                              June  1983

-------
cardiovascular system  may  appear.   Some symptoms, especially  those  from  the
nervous  system,  may  appear a long time after exposure has ceased and may not
be reversible, whereas the other effects seem to be reversible.  Infants and
young children especially  are susceptible with regard to effects on the cen-
tral nervous  system.   The  Japanese  followup  after the  so-called Morinaga  milk
poisoning  showed that persisting damage, especially  mental  retardation and
epilepsy,  is  a  late  sequela  in children of short-term oral exposure to large
doses of  inorganic arsenic.   Among adults,  the central nervous system is not
as susceptible, but peripheral neuropathy has been a common finding.
     Both  in  adults  and children,  acute oral exposure has resulted in dermal
changes, especially hyperpigmentation and keratosis, as a late  sequela.
     Acute  inhalation  exposures  have  also resulted  in  irritation  of  the upper
respiratory tract, even leading to nasal perforations.
     Direct dermal exposure  to  arsenic may  lead  to dermal changes;  allergic
reactions may also be  involved.
7.2.2  Chronic Exposure Effects
     Both  carcinogenic  and noncarcinogenic  effects are associated with long-
term exposures,  which  do  not cause any  obvious  immediate effects.   For the
purpose  of  this  document,  such  chronic effects will be discussed in sequence
as follows:
          1.   Respiratory tract cancer
          2.   Skin cancer
          3.   Non-cancerous  skin lesions
          4.   Peripheral  neuropathological  effects
          5.   Cardiovascular changes
     Cancer of the respiratory  system is clearly associated with exposure to
arsenic  via  inhalation.   This association  has  been especially noted  among
workers engaged  in the production  and usage of pesticides and among smelter
013AS5/E                             7-5                             June 1983

-------
workers.   While it is not known to what extent exposure to other compounds in
industrial atmospheres has  contributed  to  the excess of lung cancer,  the  In-
ternational Agency for Research  on  Cancer  (IARC) has concluded that there is
sufficient evidence that  inorganic  arsenic compounds are lung carcinogens in
humans.
     Cancer of the skin  has been found as  a dose-related effect in a popula-
tion in Taiwan, with  lifetime exposure  to  arsenic in well water.   It  has  also
been found among  people  treated  with large doses of arsenite for skin disor-
ders.  Skin cancer often  has a long  latency  period  in  the order of decades,
the  latency time  decreasing with increasing intensity of exposure.  IARC has
concluded that there  is  sufficient  evidence that inorganic arsenic compounds
are  skin carcinogens  in humans.
     Hyperkeratosis and hyperpigmentation,  sometimes with precancerous changes,
have been  a common finding  in persons  ingesting  arsenic.  These  skin  lesions,
as well as the manifest cancer,  develop on skin  surfaces  usually unexposed to
sunlight.   In studies in the United States, an association between skin lesions
or skin cancer  has  not been demonstrated.   These studies have been  limited,
however, by sample sizes too small to be able to detect the dose response seen
in studies outside the U.S.
     The  effects  on  the peripheral  nervous system range from sensory  disturb-
ances  to  motor  weakness  and even paralysis.  The more  severe  signs have  been
noted  in  subacute poisonings, but more  subtle changes after  long-term low-level
exposure  have  been found  by using electromyography  or measuring nerve conduc-
tion velocity.  These subclinical effects  are slow  in recovery and may persist
for  years  after cessation of exposure.  In a  study  in Canada,  electromyographic
(EMG)  changes  were  noted when water  concentrations of arsenic exceeded 0.05
mg/1.


013AS5/E                     '         7-6                              June 1983

-------
     Cardiovascular effects have  been  noted especially in Taiwan, where the
so-called Blackfoot Disease (peripheral vasculopathy) occurred after long-term
exposure to arsenic  in  well  water.   However, the presence of ergotamine-like
compounds  raises  the possibility of  vascular effects  from  these agents.
Peripheral  vascular  changes were  also  found among German  vintners  who were
exposed both occupationally,  by  spraying arsenic containing pesticides, and
orally, by drinking wine with elevated arsenic levels.   Studies on occupation-
ally exposed persons have  been inconclusive  in showing that  arsenic causes  an
increase in mortality from cardiac disease.
7.3  DOSE-EFFECT/DQSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIPS
7.3.1  General  Considerations
     This  section  generally  attempts  to define,  as presently feasible, human
dose-effect/dose-response  relationships  for  health effects of  likely greatest
concern at ambient environment exposure levels  for arsenic  in  the United
States.  As  such, the  present  section  highlights mainly the quantitative
carcinogenic risk estimates that were derived in  Section 5.2.1.4.
     The general  question  of  how  to define  and  employ  a dose factor in at-
tempts at  quantitative  assessments  of  human health  risk  for any toxicant  is
highly dependent  upon 1)  the available  information  on the body's ability  to
metabolize the agent, and 2) the assessment of the relative utility of various
internal indices of exposure.
     The time period over which  a given total intake occurs is highly impor-
tant.   For example, intake of one  gram of arsenic over a period of years would
be quite different pathophysiologically from assimilating this amount at one
time,  the  latter  probably having  a lethal outcome.  This  time-dependent be-
havior is  related  in part to the relative  ability  of  the body  to detoxify
inorganic arsenic by methylation as a function of both  dose and time.

013AS5/E                             7-7                             June 1983

-------
     In cases of acute and sub-acute exposure,  indicators  of internal  exposure
such as blood  or  urine arsenic levels are probably appropriate  for assessing
the intensity of exposure.
     With chronic,  low-level  exposure,  however,  the available  data  would
indicate that  the total amount assimilated is probably more important than an
indicator concentration without  knowledge of the total exposure period.  An
added problem is the background level of arsenic found in  these  indicators due
to dietary  habits.   For example,  in  acute exposures,  levels in blood or urine
would  be  greatly elevated  over  background  values  while  low-level chronic
exposures would only result in moderate increases over background.
     In regard  to hair arsenic levels  as  an  indicator of  internal  arsenic  ex-
posure, no  reliable  methods exist for distinguishing  external contamination
levels from those accumulated via absorption and metabolic distribution.  Hair
arsenic levels cannot, therefore, be employed as reliable indicators of either
current or  cumulative long-term  exposures for  individual  subjects, but  rather
may  provide only a  rough  overall  indication of group exposure  situations.
     Given  the above  considerations  and limitations concerning the  use  of
blood,  urinary or hair arsenic concentrations as  internal  indices  of cumula-
tive,  long-term low-level  arsenic exposures  of concern here,  the dose-effect/
dose-response  relationships summarized below are  done  so mainly in terms of
external arsenic  exposure  levels  via  either  inhalation or ingestion.
7.3.2   Effects  and Dose-Response  Relationships
      It  is  difficult to define a  precise  acute  lethal  dose  of arsenic for  man,
because  such exposure situations rarely  allow  accurate  determination of the
effective  amounts.   However, for trivalent arsenic, the figure  is believed to
range  from  70- 180 milligrams.
 013AS5/E                             7-8                             June 1983

-------
     For subacute  exposure,  it  appears  that for children,  about  one gram
assimilated over a  period  of 3-4 weeks will  induce death with severe effects
in survivors, while  for  adults,  that dose will  occasion significant clinical
effects.  In one poisoning episode, intake of approximately 50 milligrams over
a period as short as two weeks resulted in clinically demonstrable effects in
adults.
7.3.2.1  Respiratory Cancer—A considerable number of studies have shown asso-
ciations between occupational exposure  to arsenic and cancer of the respira-
tory system.  The best information available for making quantitative  risk es-
timates for lung cancer  are  derived from 5 sets of data involving 4  sets of
investigators and 2 distinct exposed populations.   The 4 sets of investigators
are Brown and Chu  (1983a,b,c),  Lee-Feldstein (1982) and Higgins (1982)--who
conducted studies on workers at the Anaconda  smelter in Montana—and Enter!ine
and Marsh (1982)—who conducted  a study on the  workers at the ASARCO smelter
in Tacoma,  Washington.
     Using an absolute-risk  linear  model  and the data from the four  smelter
studies, the lifetime lung  cancer risk,  due  to continuous exposure of 1 ug/
As/m3, was estimated to  range  from 1.25 x 10 3 to  7.6 x 10 3.  A weighted
average of the five estimates* in this range  gave  a composite estimate of 4.29
x 10 3  (see Section  5.2.1.4.2).   This represents  a plausible estimate of the
upper limit of risk—that is, the true risk would not likely be more  than the
estimated risk,  but it could be substantially lower.
7.3.2.2  Skin Cancer—Chronic  arsenic exposure, both occupational  and  non-
occupational,  is associated with a distinctive hyperkeratosis, which is  usually
followed by a later onset of skin cancer.  The best data available for making
*Two risk  estimates  were  derived from the Enterline  and  Marsh study based
 upon exposure periods lagged 0 and 10 years.   See Table 5-25.
013AS5/E                             7-9                             June 1983

-------
quantitative risk estimates for skin cancer are the data collected by Tseng et
al. (1968).   In this study, the authors surveyed a stable population of 40,421
individuals who  lived in a rural area along the southwest coast of Taiwan and
who were known to have consumed drinking water containing arsenic.   The occur-
rences of skin cancer among this population, and the arsenic concentrations in
their drinking water were measured.   Since the population was stable, the data
obtained from the study lends itself to predictions of lifetime probability of
skin cancer caused by the ingestion of arsenic.
     Using an  absolute-risk  linear  model  and the data from Tseng et al., the
lifetime skin cancer risk from drinking water containing 1 ug/liter of arsenic
was estimated to be 4.3 x 10"4 (see Section 5.2.1.4.3).   It is not likely that
the true  risk  for skin cancer would be more than this estimated risk, but it
could be considerably lower.
7.3.2.3   Non-cancerous Skin Lesions — As  noted above, in man, chronic oral
exposure to arsenic induces a sequence of changes in skin epithelium, proceeding
from hyperpigmentation to hyperkeratosis, characterized as keratin proliferation
of a verrucose nature, and leading, in some cases, to late onset skin cancers.
These effects  have been  noted  both  in  populations which have ingested arsenic
via drinking water and among people treated with large doses of arsenite for
skin disorders.   In a recent report by Pershagen  and Vahter  (1979), the authors,
using  the data  from  a patient population  exposed  to arsenic via Fowler's
solution  (Fierz,  1975), noted an increase in prevalence of hyperkeratosis with
increasing dose  of arsenic.  The U.S.  EPA is presently  examining this  informa-
tion, along with information from other studies,  in order to determine whether
quantitative  dose-response relationships,  similar to  those seen for skin
cancer,  can be established for  these precancerous skin  lesions.
7.3.2.4    Peripheral  Neuropathological  Effects and  Cardiovascular  Changes  —
While the qualitative evidence  for  peripheral  neurological  effects and cardio-

013AS5/E                             7-10                             June  1983

-------
vascular changes in arsenic exposed populations is incontrovertible, the data
are insufficient to establish quantitative dose-response relationships at the
present time.
7.4  POPULATIONS AT SPECIAL RISK TO ARSENIC EXPOSURE
     In reviewing the literature dealing with the acute, subacute and chronic
effects of arsenic in children and adults,  the evidence suggests that children
may be  at  special  risk  for the effects of inorganic arsenic under conditions
of acute or subacute exposure.
     In earlier  sections,  reference was made to  the outbreak of pediatric
poisoning by arsenic  in  Japan due to  the  presence of  arsenic  in  infant milk
formula (Hamamoto et  al. ,  1955).   From the clinical reports published at the
time of the mass  poisoning as well as those from follow-up studies, a number
of signs of central nervous system involvement were  noted  both at the time of
the episode  and much later,  with  the  follow-up  studies showing  behavioral
problems, abnormal  brain wave patterns, marked cognitive deficits,  and severe
hearing loss in  some  of those children who survived the acute episode.   Some
of these same  tardive effects have also been  noted  in  adults but  appear to be
a  much  less constant  feature of arsenic-induced  neurotoxic effects than are
the peripheral  neuropathies.
     Because children consume more water per body weight than do adults, the
daily  intake of  arsenic  via  drinking water per kilogram body weight would be
greater in children.  This may have implications regarding chronic exposure
effects in children.  Zaldivar (1977) developed a regression equation describ-
ing this relationship.   It should be noted, however, that serious  health ef-
fects due to chronic exposure of arsenic in drinking water have not been found
at a greater frequency in children than adults.
013AS5/E                             7-11                            June 1983

-------
     Individuals residing in the vicinity of  certain  arsenic  emitting  sources,
e.g., certain types of  smelters,  may be at risk for  increased  arsenic intake
because of both direct  exposure to arsenic in air and indirect exposure via
arsenic secondarily deposited from air onto soil  or other human exposure media.
The relative contribution of such indirect exposures  to increased  risk of these
individuals for arsenic  health  effects  is difficult to define due to the lack
of information on this subject.   However, it  is most  likely minimal  in relation
to the direct effects arising from inhalation of arsenic, including  lung cancer.
     As a  large class of the general population at risk  for  increased arsenic
intake, one would have to include cigarette smokers.   However,  it is not clear
to what extent some increased arsenic intake  from tobacco smoke poses a speci-
fic heightened health effect risk although it is clear that internal indicator
levels, e.g.  blood  arsenic,  are somewhat elevated in  the case of cigarette
smokers relative to nonsmokers.
 013AS5/E                             7-12                             June  1983

-------
                                8. REFERENCES


Akland, G.  [Memo  to D.  Sivulka].  February  23,  1983.   Available from: U.S.
     Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC; Project file
     no. ECAO-HA-79-5.

Andreae, M.  0.   Arsenic speciation in seawater and interstitial waters:  the
     influence of biological-chemical interactions on the chemistry of a trace
     element.  Limnol. Oceanogr. 24:440-452, 1979.

Andreae, M.  0.   Arsenic in rain and the atmospheric mass balance of Arsenic.
     J. Geophys.  Res. 85:4512-4518, 1980.

Andreae, M.  0.   Biotransformation of arsenic in the marine environment.  In:
     Arsenic:  Industrial, Biomedical and Environmental Perspectives.  W. Lederu
     and R. Fensterheim, eds., pp. 26-1 through 26-14, 1982.

Andreae, M.  0.   Determination of arsenic species  in  natural  waters.  Anal.
     Chem. 49:820-823, 1977.

Andreae, M.  0.   Distribution and speciation of arsenic in natural waters and
     some marine algae.   Deep-Sea Res.  25:391-402, 1978.

Andreae, M.  0.,  and D.  Klumpp.   Biosynthesis  and  release of organo arsenic
     compounds by  marine  algae.   Environ.  Sci.  Techno!. 13:738-741,  1979.

Anke,  M.,  M.  Grun,  Partschefeld,  B.  Grappel,  and  A. Hennig.   Essentiality and
     function of  arsenic:   In:   Trace Element Metabolism in Man and Animals,
     Vol.  3,  M.  Kirchgessner, ed., Arbeitskreses  fur  Tierernohrungs  forschug,
     werhenstephen, Germany,  1978.  pp. 248-252.

Archer, V.  [Personal  communication with D.  Sivulka].   March 1, 1983.  Record
     of communication available from:   U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency,
     Research Triangle Park,  NC; Project file no.  ECAO-HA-79-5.

Arguello,  R.  A.,  D.  D.  Cenget,  and E.  E. Tello.   [Regional  endemic  cancer and
     arsenical  intoxication  in  Cordoba].    Rev.  Argentina Dermatosifilio.
     22:461-487,  1938.

Ariyoshi,  T. , and  T.  Ikeda.  On the Tissue distribution and the excretion  of
     arsenic  in  rats  and rabbits of administration with arsenical compounds.
     J. Hyg. Chem.  20:290-295, 1974.

Astrup, P.  Blackfoot disease.  Ugeskr.  Laeger 130:1807-1815, 1968.

Attrep, M.  Jr.,  and M.  Anirudhan.  Atmospheric  inorganic  and  organic arsenic.
     Trace Subst. Environ. Health 11:365-369, 1977.

Axelson, 0., E.  Dahlgren, C.-D. Jansson, and S. 0. Rehnlund.  Arsenic exposure
     and mortality:  a case referent study from a  Swedish copper smelter.   Br.
     J. Ind. Med. 35:8-15, 1978.
013AS3/B                           8-1                           June 1983

-------
Baetjer, A. M. ,  A.  M.  Lilienfeld, and M.  L.  Levin.   Cancer  and occupational
     exposure to inorganic arsenic.   J_n:   Abstracts 18th International Congress
     on Occupational Health, Brighton, England, September 14-19, 1975.  Organ-
     izing Committee, Brighton, England,  1975.  p. 393.

Bailar, J. C.  Ill  and F.  Ederer.  Significance  factors for the ratio  of  a
     Poisson variable to its expectation.  Biometrics 20:639-643, 1964.

Baldridge, C.  W.    Relationship  between  antisyphylitic treatment and  toxic
     cirrhoses.  Am. J.  Med. Science 188:685-690, 1934.

Baron, D. , I.  Kunick,  and I.  Frischmatter.   Further  i_n vitro  studies  on the
     biochemistry of  the  inhibition  of nucleic acid  and protein synthesis as
     induced by arsenic.  Arch. Derm. Res. 253:15-22, 1975.

Baroni, C. , G.  J.  van Esch, and  U.  Saffiotti.   Carcinogenesis tests of two
     inorganic arsenicals.  Arch. Environ. Hlth. 7:668-674,  1963.

Beaudoin,  A.  R.   Teratogenicity  of  sodium  arsenate  in rats.   Teratology
     10:153-158, 1974.

Beckman, G. ,  L.  Beckman,  and I.  Nordenson.   Chromosome aberrations  in workers
     exposed to arsenic.  Environ. Health Perspect. 19:145-146, 1977.

Bencko, V. ,  and K.  Symon.   Test of  environmental  exposure  to arsenic and
     hearing  changes  in  exposed children.   Environ.  Health Perspect.
     19:95-101, 1977.

Bencko, V. , and  K.  Symon.   The cumulation dynamics  in some tissue  of hairless
     mice  inhaling  arsenic.   Atmos.  Environ.  4:157-161, 1970.

Bencko, V., B.  Benes,  and M.  Ckirt.   Biotransformation of AS  (III)  to  AS  (V)
     and arsenic tolerance.   Arch. Toxicol.  36:159-162, 1976.

Bental,  E. ,  S. Lavy, and N.  Amir.   Electroencephalographic changes due  to
     arsenic,  thallium  and   strychnine  poisonings.   Confin.  neurol.
     21(3):233-240, 1961.

Bergstrom, J.   and P. 0. Wester.   The  effect  of dialysis on the arsenic  content
     of blood  and  muscle  tissue  from  uraemic patients.  Excerpta Med.  Int.
     Cong. Ser. 131:38-40, 1966.

Bergoglio, R.  M.   Mortality from cancer  in regions of arsenical  waters of the
     province  of Cordoba  Argentine  Republic.  Prensa Med.  Argent.  51:994-998,
     1964.

Berteau, P. E., J.   0. Flom,  R.  L. Dimmick,  and A.  R.  Boyd.   Long-term study  of
     potential carcinogenicity of inorganic  arsenic aerosols to  mice.   Toxicol.
     Appl. Pharmacol. 45:323  (Abs. No. 243),  1978.

Bertolero, F.,  E.  Marafante,  J.  Edel-rade,  R.  Pietra,  and E.  Sabbioni.  Bio-
     transformation and intracellular binding of  arsenic in  tissues  of rabbits
     after i.p. administration of 74As-labeled arsenite.   Toxicology 20:35-44,
     1981.


013AS3/B                           8-2                           June 1983

-------
Blejer, H.  P.,  and W. Wagner.   Case  study  4:   inorganic  arsenic-ambient  level
     approach  to  the control  of occupational cancerigenic exposures.   In:
     Occupational Carcinogenesis, Proceedings of a Conference, New York Academy
     of Sciences, New  York,  New York, March  24-27,  1975.   Ann.  N. Y. Acad.
     Sci.  271:179-186, 1976.

Blot, W.  J.,  and  J.  F.  Fraumeni.  Arsenical  air  pollution  and cancer.   Lancet
     11:142-144, 1975.

Borgono,  J. M. ,  and  R.  Greiber.  Epidemiological  study  of arsenicism in the
     city of  Antofagasta.   In:   Trace Substances  in  Environmental  Health-V,
     Proceedings of the 5th Annual Conference, University  of  Missouri, Columbia,
     Missouri, June  29  -  July  1, 1971.   D.  C. Hemphill,  ed., University of
     Missouri, Columbia, MO, 1972.  pp.  13-24.

Borgono,  P. M.,  P.  Vincent,  H.  Venturino,  and A.  Infante.   Arsenic  in  the
     drinking water  of  the City of Antofogasta:   epidemiological  and clinical
     study before and after the  installation  of the treatment plant.   Environ.
     Health Perspect. 19:103-105, 1977.

Braman, R. S., and C. C. Foreback.  Methylated forms of arsenic in the environ-
     ment.  Science 182:1247-1249, 1973.

Braman, R. S., D.  L.  Johnson, C. C.  Foreback, J.  M. Ammons, and J. L.  Bricker.
     Separation and determination of nanogram amounts of inorganic arsenic  and
     methylarsenic compounds.  Anal.  Chem.  49:621-625, 1977.

Braun, W.    Carcinoma  of the shin and the  internal  organs  caused  by  arsenic:
     delayed  occupational  lesions  due   to arsenic.  German  Med.  Monthly
     3:321-324, 1958.

Brown, C.  C.  and  K.  C.  Chu.  Approaches  to epidemiologic analysis  of prospec-
     tive and  retrospective  studies:   Example of lung cancer and exposure  to
     arsenic.    In:   Proceedings of  the  SIMS  Conference on  Environmental  Epi-
     demiology:   Risk  assessment, June  28-July  2,  1982,  Alta, Utah.   SIAM
     Publication, 1983a.

Brown, C.  C.  and  K.  C.  Chu.  A  new method  for the  analysis of cohort studies:
     Implications of the  multistage  theory of carcinogenesis  applied to  occu-
     pational  arsenic exposure.   To  appear  in Environmental  Health  Perspec-
     tives.   1983b.

Brown, C.  C. and K.  C.  Chu.   Implications of  the multistage theory of  carcino-
     genesis  applied to occupational  arsenic exposure.   J.  Nat!.  Cancer  Inst.
     70:455-463, 1983c.

Brune, 0.,  G.  Nordberg, and P.-O. Wester.   Distribution of  23 Elements  in
     Kidney,  Liver  and Lung of a Control  Group in  Northern  Sweden and  of
     Exposed Workers from a  Smeltery and Refinery.  Sci. Total Environ., (in
     press), 1980.
013AS3/B                           8-3                           June 1983

-------
Buchet, J.  P.,  R.  Lauwerys,  and H.  Roels.  Comparison of several methods for
     the determination of arsenic compounds in water and in urine.  Int. Arch.
     Occup. Environ.  Health 46:11-29, 1980.

Buchet, J. P., R. Lauwerys, and H.  Roels.  Comparison of the urinary excretion
     of arsenic  metabolites  after  a single oral  dose  of sodium arsenite,
     monomethyl  arsonate  or  dimethyl  arsinate in  man.   Int.  Arch. Occup.
     Environ.  Health 48:71-79, 1981a.

Buchet, J.  P.,  R.  Lauwerys,  and H.  Roels.   Urinary excretion of inorganic
     arsenic  and its metabolites  after  repeated  ingestion  of sodium meta
     arsenite by volunteers.   Int.  Arch. Occup. Environ.  Health 48:111-118,
     1981b.

Burgdorf,  W., K. Kurvink, and J. Cervenka.  Elevated sister chromatid exchange
     rate in  lymphocytes of subjects treated with  arsenic.  Hum.  Genet.  36:69-72,
     1977.

Burk,  D. ,  and A.  R.  Beaudoin.  Arsenate-induced  renal agenesis  in  rats.
     Teratology 16:247-260, 1977.

Butzengeiger, K. H.  Chronic arsenic poisoning.  I.  EKG alterations and other
     symptoms observed  on  the  heart and vascular  system.   II.  Mucous  membrane
     symptoms  and  pathogenesis.  Dtsch.  Arch.  Klin.  Med. 194:  1-16,  1949.

Butzengeiger, K. H.   Peripheral  circulation disturbances  with chronic arsenic
     poisoning.  Klin.  Wochenschr.  19:  523-527, 1940.

Byron, W.  R. , Bierbower, G. W.  Brauwer, and W.  H.  Hansen.   Pathologic changes
     in rats  and dogs  from two-year feeding of sodium arsenite  and  sodium
     arsenate.  Toxicol. Appl.  Pharmacol.  10:  132-147,  1967.

Canadian  Public  Health  Association Task  Force  on  Arsenic.  Electromyography,
     Final  Report,  Yellowknife and  Hay River, Northwest Territories,  1978.
     Canadian Public Health Association,  Ottawa, Canada,  November 1978.

Charbonneau,  S.  M.,  G.  K.  H.  Tarn,  F. Bryce, and B. Collins.   Pharmacokinetics
     and  metabolism  of  inorganic arsenic  in  the  dog.   Trace Subst. Environ.
     Health.  12: 276-283, 1978a.

Charbonneau,  S.  M. ,  G.  K.  H.  Tarn,  F. Bryce, Z. Zadwidzka, and E. Sandi. Meta-
     bolism of orally  administered inorganic arsenic  in  the dog. Toxicol.
     Lett.  3: 107-113,  1979.

Charbonneau,  S.  M. ,  K.  Spencer, F.  Bryce, and E.  Sandi.  Arsenic excretion by
     monkeys  dosed with arsenic-containing fish  or with  inorganic arsenic.
     Bull.  Environ.  Contam. Toxicol.  20:  470-477,  1978b.

Chhuttani,  P. N. ,  L.   S. Chawla,  and T. D. Sharma.  Arsenical  neuropathy.
     Neurology  17: 269-275, 1967.
 013AS3/B                            8-4                           June 1983

-------
Ch'I, I. C.,and  R.  Q.  Blackwell.  A controlled retrospective study of black-
     foot disease, and epidemic peripheral gangrene disease in Taiwan.  Am. J.
     Epidemic!.   88: 7-24, 1968.

Cikrt, M. ,  and V. Bencko.  Fate of arsenic  after  parenteral  administration to
     rats,  with particular reference to excretion via bile.  J. Hyg. Epidemiol.
     Microbiol.  Immunol. 18:  129-136, 1974.

Ckirt, M. ,  V. Bencko,  M.  Tich,  and  B.  Benes.   Biliary  excretion  of 74As  and
     its distribution in the golden hamster after administration  of 74As  (III)
     and 74As (V).   J.  Hyg.  Epidemiol.,  Microbiol.  and Immunol.  24:384-388,
     1980.

Coulson, E. J. ,  R.  E.  Remington, and  K.  M.  Lynch.   Metabolism in the rat of
     the naturally  occurring  arsenic  of shrimp  as  compared  with arsenic
     trioxide.  J. Nutr. 10:255-270, 1935.

Crecelius,   E.  A.   Changes in  the  chemical  speciation  of  arsenic following
     ingestion by man.   Environ. Hlth. Persp. 19:147-150,  1977.

Crecelius,   E. A.  The geochemistry of  arsenic  and antimony in  Puget Sound and
     Lake Washington, Washington.  Thesis:  University  of  Washington,  Seattle,
     Washington, 1974.

Crema, A.   Distribution et elimination de Tarsenic  76  chez la souris normale
     et cancereuse.   Arch. int.  Pharmacodyn. 103:57-70, 1955.

Damsgaard,   E. , K. Heydorn, N.  Larsen and B.  Nielsen.   Simultaneous determina-
     tion of arsenic, manganese  and selenium in human serum by neutron activa-
     tion  analysis.   Report  No.  271.   Danish Atomic  Energy Commission,
     Roskilde, 1973.

Day, N.  E.,  and  C.  C.  Brown.   Multistage models  and primary  prevention  of
     cancer.  J.  Natl.  Cancer  Inst. 64:977-989, 1980.

Dieke, S.  H., and C.  P. Richter.  Comparative  assays of rodenticides  on  wild
     Norway Rats.  I.  Toxicity.  Publ. Health  Rep. 61:672-679, 1946.

Doll, R.  Weibull distribution  of cancer.   Inplications for models of  carcino-
     genesis.   J. Roy.  Statistical So. A  13:133-166, 1971.

Doll, R. and  R.  Peto.   Cigarette smoking and  bronchial carcinoma:  dose and
     time  relationships among  regular smokers and  life-long non-smokers.
     J.  Epi.:   Comm. Health 32:303-113, 1978.

Done, A.  K. ,  and A.  J.  Peart.  Acute  toxicities of arsenical herbicides.
     Clin.  Toxicol.  4:343-355,  1971.

Dubois, K.   P.,  A.  L.  Moxon,  and 0.  E.  Olson.   Further  studies on the effec-
     tiveness  of arsenic  in  preventing selenium  poisoning.    J. Nutr.
     19:477-482, 1940.

Ducoff,  H.   S. , W.  B.  Neal, R.  L.  Straube,  L.   D.  Jacobson, and A.  M.  Brues.
     Biological  studies with  arsenic76.   II.   Excretion and tissue localiza-
     tion.   Proc. Soc.  Exp.  Biol. Med. 69:548-554, 1948.

013AS3/B                           8-5                            June  1983

-------
Durrant, P.  J.,  and B.  Durrant.   Introduction to Advanced Inorganic Chemistry.
     3rd Ed., Longmans, Green and Co., Ltd., London, 1966.

Dutkiewicz,   T.   Experimental  studies on arsenic  absorption  routes in rats.
     Environ. Health.  Persp. 19:173-177, 1977.

Edmonds, J.   S. ,  and K. A.  Francesconi.   Methylated  arsenic  from marine  fauna.
     Nature 265:436, 1977.

Edmonds, J.   S.,  K. A.  Francesconi,  J.  R. Cannon,  C.  L.  Raston,  B.  W.  Skelton,
     and A.  H.  White.   Isolation, crystal structure and synthesis  of  arsenobe-
     taine,   the  arsenical  constituent of the western  rock  lobster Panulirus
     longipes cygnus George.  Tetrahedron Lett. 18:1543-1546, 1977.

Eldred, R. ,  L.  Ashbaugh,  T. Cahill,  R.  Flocchini and M.  Pitchford.   Sulfate
     levels  in  the southwest during the 1980 copper smelter strike.  JAPCA 33:
     110-113, 1983.

Enter!ine,  P. E.  and  G.  M. Marsh.  Mortality studies  of  smelter workers.   Am
     J. Ind. Med.  1: 251-259, 1980.

Enterline,  P. E.  and  G.  M.  Marsh.   Mortality among workers  exposed to arsenic
     and other  substances  in a copper  smelter.  Am. J.  Epi.  116: 895-910,  1982.

Feldman,  C.  Improvements  in the  arsineaccumulation-helium glow  detector
     procedure  for determining  traces  of  arsenic.   Anal. Chem. 51:664-669,
     1979.

Ferm,  V.  H.   Arsenic as  a teratogenic agent.   Environ.  Health.  Persp.
     19:215-217,  1977.

Ferm,  V.  H., and S.  Carpenter.   Malformations induced by sodium arsenate.   J.
     Reprod. Fertil.  17:199-201,  1968.

Ferslew,  K. E. , and G. T.  Edds.   Effects  of arsanilic acids on growth, serum
     enzymes, hematologic  values,  and residual  arsenic in young swine.   Am. J.
     Vet. Res.   40:1365-1369, 1979.

Feussner, J. R. ,  J. D.  Shelburne,  S. Bredehoeft, and H. J. Cohen.   Arsenic-
      induced bone marrow  toxicity:   ultrastructural  and electron-probe analysis.
      Blood  53:820-827,  1979.

Fierz, U.   Catamnestic investigations  of  the side effects  of therapy of skin
      diseases with inorganic arsenic.   Dermatologica 131:41-58, 1965.

Fiscor, G.   and G. Piccolo.  Survey of pesticides for  mutagenicity by the
      bacterial-piate  assay method.   EMS Newsl.  6: 6-8, 1972

Fowler, B.   Toxicology  of environmental arsenic.  In:   Toxicology of Trace
      Elements.   R. A.  Gayer and M.  A. Mehlman, eds.  Halstead Press, New York.
      pp.  79-122, 1977.
 013AS3/B                           8-6                           June  1983

-------
Frank, G.   Neurologische  und psychiatrische Folgesymptome bei  akuter Arsen-
     Wasserstoff-Vergiftung.  J. Neurol. 213:59-70, 1976.

Franke, K.  W.,  and A.  L.  Moxon.   A  comparison  of  the  minimal  fatal  doses of
     selenium,  tellurium,  arsenic and  vanadium.   J.   Pharmacol.  Exp.  Ther.
     58:454-459, 1936.

Freeman, J. W.,  and J.  R.  Couch.   Prolonged encephalopathy with arsenic poison-
     ing.  Neurology 28:853-855, 1978.

Ganther, H. E.,  and C.  A.  Baumann.  Selenium metabolism.  I.   Effects  of  diet,
     arsenic and cadmium.   J. Nutr. 77:210-216, 1962.

Ganther, H. E.,  and H.  S.  Hsieh.   Mechanisms for the conversion of selenite to
     selenides in mammalian tissues.   In:  Trace Element Metabolism  in Animals.
     2.  (W.  G.  Hoekstra,  J. W.  Suttie,  H.  E.  Ganther and W. Mertz,  Eds.).
     University Park Press, Baltimore, 1974.  p. 339.

Garb,  L. G.,  and  C.  H.  Hine.  Arsenical  neuropathy:   Residual  effects follow-
     ing acute industrial  exposure.  J. Occup. Med.  19:567-568,  1977.

Gerhardt,  R. , J.  Hudson,  R. Rao  and  R.  Sobel.   Chronic renal  insufficiency
     from  cortical  necrosis induced  by  arsenic  poisoning.   Arch.  Intern.  Med.
     138:1267-1269, 1978.

Ginsberg,  J.  M.   Renal  mechanism  for excretion and transformation of arsenic
     in the dog.  Am. J. Physio!.  208:832-840, 1965.

Ginsberg,  J.  M.  and W.  D.Lotspeich.   Interrelations  of arsenate and phosphate
     transport in the dog kidney.  Am. J. Physio.  205:707-714,  1963.

Hamamoto,  E.   [Infant arsenic  poisoning by  powdered  milk].   Jap.  Med.  J.
     1649:2-12,  1955.

Hanlon, D.  P.,  and V. H.  Ferm.   Placenta!  permeability of arsenate ion during
     early  embryogenesis  in the  hamster.   Experientia  3_3:1221-1222,  1977.

Hara,  I.,  K.  Hashimoto,  K.  Miyazaki, and  K.  Sunada.   Case studies  of poly-
     neuritis believed to have  been caused by arsenical  poisoning.   TR-79-0524,
     Labor  Health Department of the Osaka Public Health  Research  Center,  Osaka
     University.  Sangyo Igaku  11(1):84-90, 1968.

Harrington, M.,  J.  P.  Mcdaugh,  D. L.  Morse,  and J.  Housworth.  A study of a
     population exposed to  high concentrations of arsenic  in well  water in
     Fairbanks,  Alaska.   Amer.  J.  Epidem. 108:377-385,  1978.

Harrison,  J.  W.  E., E.  W.  Packman, and  D.  C.  Abbott.   Acute oral  toxicity and
     chemical and physical  properties of arsenic trioxides.  A.M.A.  Arch.  Ind.
     Health 17:118-123, 1958.
013AS3/B                           8-7                            June 1983

-------
Henry, F. T. , and T. M. Thorpe.  Determination of arsenic  (III),  arsenic  (V),
     monomethyl  arsonate and  dimethyl  arsinate by differential pulse polaro-
     graphy  after  separation  by ion-exchange  chromatography.  Anal. Chem.
     52:80-83, 1980.

Hernberg, S.  Incidence of  cancer  in population with exceptional exposure to
     metals.  |n:   Cold Spring Harbor  Conferences on  Cell  Proliferation,  Vol.
     4, Origins  of  Human Cancer, Book  A,  Incidence  of Cancer  in  Humans, H. H.
     Hiatt,  J. D. Watson, and J. A. Winsten, eds.,  Cold  Spring Harbor Labora-
     tory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, 1977.   pp.  147-157.

Heyman, A.,  J. B. Pfeiffer, Jr., R. W.  Willett,  and H. M.  Taylor.   Peripheral
     neuropathy caused by arsenical  intoxication.   A study of 41 cases with
     observations on the effects  of BAL (2,3-dimercapto-propanol).   N.  Engl.
     J. Med. 254:401-409,  1956.

Heydorn,  K.   Environmental  variation  of  arsenic  levels  in   human  blood
     determined by neutron acitvation analysis.  Clin. Chim. Acta. 28:344-356,
     1969.                                                         ~~

Heywood,  R. ,  and  R.  J.  Sortwell.   Arsenic intoxication  in the Rhesus monkey.
     Toxicology Letters 3:137-144,  1979.

Higgins,  I., K.  Welch and C. Burchfiel.  Mortality  of Anaconda smelter workers
     in relation  to arsenic and other  exposures.   Ann  Arbor, MI. ,  Dept. of
     Epidemiology, Univ.  of Michigan.    1982.

Higgins,  I.  Arsenic and respiratory cancer among a sample of  Anaconda Smelter
     Workers.  Report  submitted to OSHA in the  comments  of  the  Kennecott
     Minerals Company  on  the inorganic arsenic  rulemaking (Exhibit  203-5),
     1982.

Hill, A.  B., and E.  L.  Faning.  Studies on the incidence of cancer in a factory
     handling inorganic compounds of arsenic.  I.   Mortality  experience in the
     factory.  Br. J. Ind.  Med.  5:1-6,  1948.

Hindmarsh, J. T., 0. R. McLetchie,  L.   P. Heffernan, 0. A.  Haynie,  H.  A. Ellen-
     berger,  R.  F.  McCurdy, and H.  J.  Thiebaux.   Electromyographic abnormali-
     ties in chronic  environmental  arsenical ism.   J. of Analytical  Toxicol.
     1:270-276, 1977.

Hine,  C.  H., S.  S.  Pinto, and K. W. Nelson.  Medical  problems associated with
     arsenic exposure.   J.  Occup.  Med.  19:391-396,  1977.

Holland,  J.  W.   Arsenic.   Iji:   A Text-Book  of  Legal Medicine  and  Toxicology,
     Vol  2,  F. Peterson and W.  S.  Haines,  eds.,  Philadelphia:  W. B. Saunders
     & Company, 1904.

Holland,  R.  H.   and A.  R.  Acevedo.  Current status of  arsenic  in American
     cigarettes.   Cancer 19:1248-1250,  1966.

Holland,  R.  H. ,  M.  S.  McCall, and H.  C.  Lanz.  A study  of inhaled arsenic-74
     in man.  Cancer Res.  19:1154-1156,  1959.
013AS3/B                           8-8                            June 1983

-------
Holmqvist, I.  Occupational arsenical  dermatitis.   A  study  among  employees  at
     a copper ore smelting work  including  investigations  of skin  reactions  to
     contact with arsenic compounds.  Acta. Derm. Venerol.  31:(Suppl. 26)1-214,
     1951.

Hood, R.  D.,  and C.  T.  Pike.   BAL alleviation of  arsenate-induced  terato-
     genesis in mice.   Teratology 6:235-238, 1972.

Hood, R.  D. ,  and S.  L.  Bishop.  Teratogenic  effects  of  sodium arsenate  in
     mice.  Arch. Environ. Health 24:62-65, 1972.

Hood, R. D., G.  T. Thacker, and B.  L. Patterson.  Effects in the mouse and  rat
     of prenatal  exposure to  arsenic.   Environ. Health Perspec.  19:219-222,
     1977.

Hood, R.  Toxicology of prenatal exposure to arsenic.   In:  Arsenic:  Industrial,
     Biomedical  and Environmental Perspectives.  W. Lederu  and R. Fensterheim,
     eds., 1982.

Hueper,  W.   A quest into the environmental causes of  cancer  of the lung,
     Public Health Monograph  No.  36.  U.S. Department  of Health,  Education,
     and Welfare, Public Health Service, 1955.  pp. 27-29.

Hueper,  W.C.  and  W.W.  Payne.   Experimental studies in  metal carcinogenesis.
     Chromium, nickel,  iron,  arsenic.   Arch.  Environ. Health.  5:  445,  1962.

Hueper,  W.C.   Experimental studies in metal carcinogenesis.  VI. Tissue reactions
     in rats  and rabbits  after parenteral introduction  of suspensions  of
     arsenic, beryllium,  or  asbestos in lanolin.   J. Nat.  Cancer Inst.  15:
     113,  1954.                                                            ~~

Hunter,  F. T., A. F.  Kip, and J. W.  Irvine, Jr.  Radioactive tracer  studies on
     arsenic  injected   as  potassium arsenite.   J. Pharmacol.  Exp.  Ther.
     76:207-220, 1942.

Hutchinson,  J.   On some  examples  of arsenic  keratoses of  the skin and  of
     arsenic-cancer.   Trans.  Pathol. Soc. (London)  39:352-363, 1888.

Inamasu, T. , A.  Hisanaga and N. Ishinishi.   Comparison of arsenic trioxide  and
     calcium  arsenate  retention  in the rat lung after intratracheal  instilla-
     tion.  Toxicol.  Lett. 12: 1-5,  1982.

International Agency for Research  on Cancer.    IARC monographs on the evalua-
     tion of the carcinogenic risk of chemicals to  man, Vol. 2, Some inorganic
     and  organometallic compounds.  World  Health Organization,  Lyon, 1973.

International Agency for Research  on Cancer.   Monographs  on the  Evaluation  of
     the  Carcinogenic  Risk of Chemicals to Humans.   Some Metals and Metallic
     Compounds.  Vol.  23,  Lyon, France,  1980.

Irgolic, K. J.,  E. A.  Woolson, R. A. Stockton,  R. D.  Newman, N. R. Bottino, R.
     A.  Zingaro,  P. C.  Kearney, R.  A.  Pyles,  S. A. Maeda,  W. J. McShane, and
     E.  R. Cox.   Characterization of arsenic compounds formed by Daphnia  magna
     and Tetraselmis cheiri from inorganic arsenate.  Environ.  Health Perspect.
     19:61-66, 1977.

013AS3/B                           8-9                           June 1983

-------
Irgolic, K.  Speciation of arsenic compounds in water supplies.   U.  S.  Environ-
     mental  Protection Agency, Health Effects Research Laboratory,  Cincinnati,
     Ohio.   EPA-600/S1-82-010, 1982.

Irgolic, K.  [Personal communication with D. Sivulka].  March 10, 1983.  Record
     of communication available  from:   U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency,
     Research Triangle Park, NC;  Project file no.  ECAO-HA-70-5.

Ishinishi,  N., Y.  Kodama,  E.  Kunitake, K.  Nobutomo, M. Urabe,  T. Inamasu, Y.
     Suenaga, and  T.  Hatano.  Ninon  Rinsho 31:1991-1999,  1973.   (In Japanese)

Ishinishi,  N., Y.  Kodama,  K.  Nobutomo, and A. Hisanaga.  Preliminary experi-
     mental  study on carcinogenicity of arsenic trioxide in rat  lung.   Environ.
     Health Perspect.  19:191-196, 1977.

Ishinishi,  N. , M.  Mizunoe,  T. Inamasu  and  A.  Hisanaga.   Experimental  study  on
     carcinogenicity  of  beryllium  oxide and arsenic trioxide  to the  lung of
     rats by  an  intratracheal instillation.   Fukuoka Acta Med. 71:  19-26,
     1980.                                                        ~~

Ivankovic,  S. , G.  Eisenbrand, and  R. Preussmann.   Lung Carcinoma Induction  in
     BD Rats After a Single Intratracheal  Instillation of an Arsenic-Containing
     Pesticide Mixture Formerly Used in Vineyards.   Int. J. Cancer 24:786-788,
     1979.

Japanese Pediatric  Society.   Summary of Report of Activities  of the  Morinaga
     Arsenic-tainted  Powdered Milk Poisoning Investigation.    TR-124-74.  May
     26, 1973.

Jelinek, C.  F. ,  and  P.  E.  Corneliussen.  Levels  of arsenic  in the  United
     States food supply.  Environ. Health  Perspect.  19:83-87  (1977).

Jenkins, R.  B.   Inorganic  arsenic and the nervous system.  Brain 89:479-498,
     1966.

Johnson, D.  L., and R. S. Braman.  Alkyl-and  inorganic arsenic in air samples.
     Chemosphere 6:333-338, 1975.

Johnson, R.  D. ,  D. Manske  and D.  Podrebarac.  Pesticide, metal, and other
     chemical residues in adult total  diet samples (XII).  August, 1975 -July,
     1976.   Pesticides Mont. J.  15:  54-69, 1981a.

Johnson, R.  D. ,  D.  Manske,  D. New and  D.  Podrebarac.  Pesticide, heavy metal,
     and other  chemical residues  in infant  and toddler  total  diet  samples
     (II).   August,  1975 -  July,  1976.  Pesticides Mont.  J.  15: 39-50,  1981b.

Jung,  E. ,  B.  Trachsel and  H. Immich.  Arsenic as  an inhibitor of the enzymes
     concerned in  cellular  recovery  (dark  repair).   Ger.  Med.  Mon. 14:614-616,
     1969.

Jung,  E. and B.  Trachsel.   Molekularbiologische  Untersuchungen zur Arsencar-
     cinogenese.    Arch.  Klin. Exp. Dermatol.  237:  819-826, 1970
013AS3/B                           8-10                           June  1983

-------
Kadowaki,  K.  Studies  on  the arsenic contents in organ-tissues of the normal
     Japanese.   Osaka  City Med.  J.  9:2083-2099,  1960.   (In Japanese with
     English summary.)

Kagey, B.  T., J. E. Bumgarner, and J. P. Creason.  Arsenic levels in maternal-
     fetal tissue sets.  Trace Subst. Environ. Health 11:252-256, 1977.

Kanisawa,  M., and H.A. Schroeder.  Life term studies on the  effects of arsenic,
     germanium, tin and  vanadium on spontaneous tumors in mice.  Cancer  Res.
     27: 1192-1195, 1967.

Kanisawa,  M. , and  H.  A.  Schroeder.  Life term studies on the effect of trace
     elements on spontaneous tumors  in mice and  rats.  Cancer Res. 29:892-895,
     1969.

Kanstra,  L.  D. ,  and C. W. Bonhorst.   Effect  of  arsenic  on  the  expiration of
     volatile selenium compounds by rats.   Proc.  S.  Dak.  Acad. Sci.  32:72,
     1953.

Kelynack,   T.  N. ,  W. Kirkly,  S.  Delepine,  and C.  H.  Tattersall.   Arsenical
     poisoning from beer-drinking.   Lancet 2:1600-1602, 1900.

Klaassen,   C.  D.   Biliary excretion  of  arsenic in rats, rabbits,  and  dogs.
     Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 29:447-457, 1974.

Knoth, W.   Arsenbehandlung.  Arch. Klin. Exp.  Derm.   227:228-234, 1966.

Kraybill,   H.  F.   Carcinogenesis induced by  trace contaminants in  potable
     water.  Bull.  N.Y. Acad. Sci. 54:413-427, 1978.

Kroes,  R. ,  M.J.  van Logten, J.M.  Berkvens,  T. de Vries and G.J.  Van Esch.
     Study  on  the  carcinogenicity of lead  arsenate and sodium arsenate and on
     the  possible  synergistic  effect  of diethylnitrosamine.   Food Cosmet.
     Toxicol. 12:  671-679, 1974.

Kuratsune,  M.,  S.  Tokudome,  T.  Shirakusa,  M.  Yoshida, Y.  Tokumitsu, T. Hayano
     and  M.  Seita.   Occupational  lung  cancer  among  copper  smelters.   Int. J.
     Cancer.  13:552-558, 1974.

Kyle,  P.  A. ,  and G.  L.  Pease.   Hematologic aspects of arsenic intoxication.
     New  Eng. J. Med.  273:18-23,  1965.

Lakso,  J.  U., and  S. A. Peoples.   Methylation  of inorganic  arsenic  by  mammals.
     J. Agric.  Food Chem. 23:674-676, 1975.

Lakso,  J.,  L. Rose, S. Peoples  and D. Shirachi.   A colorimetric method for the
     determination  of  arsenite,  arsenate, monomethylarsonic  acid,  and  dimethyl -
     arsinic  acid  in  biological  and environmental samples.   J. Agric.  Food
     Chem.  27:1229-1233,  1979.

Landau, E., D.  J.   Thompson,  R.  G.  Feldman, G.  J.  Goble,  and W. J.  Dixon.
     Selected  non-carcinogenic  effects  of  industrial exposure  to  inorganic
     arsenic, EPA  569/6-77-018,  U.S. Environmental  Protection Agency,  Washing-
     ton, DC, July  1977.


013AS3/B                           8-11                          June  1983

-------
Lander,  J. J. ,  R.  J.  Stanely, H. W.  Sumner,  D.  C. Boswell, and R. D. Aach.
     Angiosarcoma of the  liver  associated with Fowler's  solution  (potassium
     arsenate).   Gastroenterology 58:1582-1586, 1975.

Lanz, H. , Jr.,  P. C. Wallace, and J.  G.   Hamilton.   The metabolism of arsenic
     in laboratory animals using As74 as a tracer.  Univ.  Calif. Publs. Pharmacol,
     2:263-282,  1950.

Lao, R.  C.,  R. S. Thomas, T.  Teichman, and L.  Dubois.  Efficiency  of  collection
     of arsenic trioxide in high volume sampling.   Sci. Total Environ. 2:373-379,
     1974.

Larsen,  N. A. ,  H.  Pakkenberg, E. Damsgaard,  and  K.  Heydorn.  Topographical
     distribution of  arsenic, manganese,  and selenium in the  normal  human
     brain.   J.  Neurolog. Sci. 42:407-416, 1979.

Le Quesne, P. M., and J. G. McLeod.   Peripheral neuropathy  following  a single
     exposure to  arsenic.  J.  of the Neurological Sciences  32:437-451, 1977.

LeBlanc,  P.   J.,  and A.  L. Jackson.   Arsenic in marine  fish  and  invertebrates.
     Mar.  Pollut. Bull.  4:88-90, 1973.

Lee-Feldstein,  A.  Arsenic and  respiratory cancer in  man:  follow-up of an
     occupational study. In:  Arsenic: Industrial, Biomedical and Environmental
     Perspectives.  W.  Lederu and R.  Fensterheim, eds., 1982.

Lee, A. M.,  and J.  F.   Fraumeni, Jr.  Arsenic and respiratory  cancer  in man:
     an occupational study.   J.  Natl. Cancer  Inst. 42:1045-1052, 1969.

Leitch, A.,  and E. L.  Kennaway.   Experimental production  of  cancer by arsenic.
     Brit. Med.  J. 2:1107-1108, 1922.  (Cited  in  IARC, 1980)

Lerman, B. B. ,  N. Ali,  and D. Green.  Megaloblastic, Dyserythropoietic anemia
     following  arsenic  ingestion.    Ann.  Clin. Lab.  Sci. 10:515-517, 1980.

Leslie, H.,  and H.Smith.   Self-poisoning  by  the  abuse of arsenic-containing
     tonics.   Med. Sci.  Law 18:159-162, 1978.

Levander, 0.  A.   Metabolic  interrelationships between arsenic  and selenium.
     Environ. Hlth. Perspec.   19:159-164,  1977.

Levander, 0.  A., and C. A.  Baumann.   Selenium metabolism.  VI.   Effect of
     arsenic  on the excretion of selenium in  the  bile.  Tox. Appl. Pharmacol.
     9:106-115,  1966.

Liebscher, K. ,  and  H.  Smith.  Essential  and  nonessential trace elements.   A
     method  of  determining whether an element is  essential  or nonessential in
     human tissue.  Arch. Environ.  Health 17:881-890,  1968.

Lindh,  U. , D. Brune,  G.  Nordberg,  P. 0.  Wester.   Levels of antimony, arsenic,
     cadmium, copper,  lead,  mercury, selenium, silver,  tin and zinc in bone
     tissue  of  industrially  exposed workers.   Sci. Total  Environ.  16:109-116,
     1980.
013AS3/B                            8-12                           June 1983

-------
Lu,  F. J. , M.  H.  Tsai  and L.  H.  Ling.   Studies of fluorescent compounds in
     drinking water of Blackfoot  Disease indemic areas: 1, the toxic effects
     of fluorescent compounds on the chick embryo.   J. Formosan Med. Assn. 76:
     58-63, 1977 a.

Lu,  F.-J., M.-H.  Tsau,  and K.-H Ling.   Studies  on fluorescent compounds in
     drinking water of blackfoot endemic areas.   2.  Isolation and identifica-
     tion of  fluorescent  compounds.   Tai-wan I Hsuch Hui Tsa Chik 76:209-17,
     1977.  Chem.  Abs.  87:141054d, 1977.                           ~

Lu,  F.-J, M.-H. Tsai,  and K.-H. Ling.   Studies  on fluorescent compounds in
     drinking water of areas endemic for blackfoot disease.  3.  Isolation and
     identification of fluorescent  compounds.   Tai-wan I Hsuch Hui  Tsa  Chih
     77:68-76, 1978.   Chem. Abs. 89:152,200r, 1978.

Lubin, J. H.,  L.  M.  Pottern, W. J. Blot, S. Tokudome,  B.  J.  Stone  and J.  F.
     Fraumeni,  Jr.  Respiratory cancer  among copper  smelter workers: recent
     mortality statistics.  JOM 23:  779-784, 1981.

Luchtrath, H.   Die Leberzirrhose bei  chronischer Arsen  vergiftung der winzer.
     Dtsch. Med. Wochenschr.   97:21-22, 1972.

Lundgren, K.  D.   Damage  in the respiratory  organs of workers  at a  smeltery.
     Nord. Hyg. Tidskr.  3:66-82, 1954.

Lyon, J.  L. ,  et al.   Arsenical air pollution and  lung cancer.  Lancet 2:869,
     October 22, 1977.

Mabuchi,  K., A. Lilienfeld, and L. Snell.  Lung cancer among pesticide workers
     exposed to inorganic arsenicals.   Archives Environ Health, 312-319, 1979.

Mahaffey, K.  R.,  and  B.  A. Fowler.   Effects of  concurrent administration of
     lead, cadmium, and arsenic in the  rat.   Environ. Hlth  Perspec.   19:165-171,
     1977.

Mappes,  R.   [Experiments on excretion  of  arsenic  in urine.]  Versuche  zur
     Ausscheidung  von  Arsen in  Urin.    Int. Arch.  Occup.  Environ.  Health
     40:267-272, 1977.

Marafante, E.,  J.  Rade,  R. Pietra, E.  Sabbioni,  and F.  Bertolero.   In:  M.
     Anke, H.-J.  Schneider,  and C.  Bruckner.  Eds.   Proc.  3rd Symp. on  Trace
     Elements.   Arsenic.    Abteilung  Wissenschaftliche  Publikationen  der
     Friedrich-Schiller Universitat, Jena, 1980.   Pp. 49-55.

Masahiki, 0., and A.  Hideyasu.   Epidemiological  studies on  the Morinaga  powdered
     milk poisoning incident:   Final  report of  the  joint project team  from
     Hiroshima  and Okayama Universities.   Nihon eiseigaku  zasshi [Jap.  J. of
     Hyg.] 27:500-531, 1973.

Massmann, W., and H.  Opitz.  Experimentalle Untersuchungen  uber Ekg-Veranderunger
     bei  chronischer Arsenvergiftung.   Z.  Kreislaufforsch. 43:704-713,  1954.
013AS3/B                           8-13                          June 1983

-------
Matanoski, G.,  E.  Landau, and E. Elliott.  Epidemiology Studies.  Task I-Phase
     I.   Pilot Study of  Cancer  Mortality near  an  Arsenical  Pesticide  Plant in
     Baltimore.    EPA-560/6-76-003,  U.S.  Environmental  Protection  Agency,
     Washington,  DC, May 1976.

Matanoski, G. , E. Landau, J.  Tonascia,  C.  Lazar,  E.  Elliot,  W.  McEnroe  and K.
     King.  Cancer mortality in an industrial area of Baltimore. Environ.  Res.
     25:  8-28,  1981.

McBride,  B. , H. Merilees,  W.  Cullen and W.  Pickett.   Anaerobic and  aerobic
     alkylation of  arsenic.   In:  Organometals  and  Organometalloids. F.  E.
     Brinckman and  J.  M.  Bellama, eds.   Symposium Series No.  82, Am. Chem.
     Soc., Washington DC, 1978.   pp.  94-115.  (Cited in Vahter, 1981).

McCabe,  L. J.,  J.  M. Symons, R.  D. Lee,  and G. G. Robeck.  Survey of  community
     water supply  systems.   J.  Amer.  Water Works Assoc.  62:670-687, 1970.

Mealey,  J. , Jr.,  G.  L. Browne!!, and  W.  H.  Sweet.   Radioarsenic in  plasma,
     urine, normal tissues, and  intracranial neoplasms.   Arch.  Neurol. Psychiatr.
     81:310-320,  1959.

Mertz, W.   Aspects of nutritional trace  element research.  Fed. Proc. 29:1482-1488,
     1970.                                                            ~

Milham,  S. , Jr.   Studies of morbidity  near a copper  smelter.  Environ.  Health
     Perspect.  19:131-132, 1977.

Milham,  S. ,  Jr.,  and  T.  Strong.  Human  arsenic  exposure in relation to  a
     copper smelter.  Environ.  Res. 7:176-182, 1974.

Mizuta,  N. , M. Mizuta, F. Ita,  T.  Ito, H.  Uchida,  Y.  Watanabe, H.  Akama,  T.
     Murakami, F.  Hayashi, K. Nakamura,  T. Yamaguchi, W.  Mizuia,  S. Oishi, and
     H.  Matsumura.   An outbreak of acute  arsenic poisoning  caused by arsenic
     contaminated soy-sauce  (shoye).   A clinical report  of  220 cases.   Bull.
     Yamaguchi Med.  Sen. 4:131-50, 1956.

Morris, J.  S. , M. Schmid,  S.  Newman,  P. J.  Scheuer,  and S. Sherlock.   Arsenic
     and  noncirrhotic  portal  hypertension.  Gastroenterology  64:86-94,  1974.

Morton, W. , G.  Starr,  D. Pohl,  J.  Stoner, S. Wagner,  and P.  Weswig.  Skin
     cancer and water  arsenic  in Lane  County, Oregon.   Cancer (Philadelphia)
     37:2523-2532,  1976.

Moxon, A.  L.,  and K.  P.  DuBois.   The influence of arsenic and certain other
     elements on  the toxicity  of selepiferous  grains.   J. Nutr.  18:447-457,
     1939.

Munro, I.  C.   Naturally occurring toxicants  in  foods  and their significance.
     Clin. Toxicol.  9:647-663,  1976.

Munro, I.  C. ,  S.  M. Charbonneau,  E.  Sandi, K. Spencer,  F.  Bryce,  and  H.  C.
     Grice.   Biological  availability  of arsenic from  fish.   Toxicol.  Appl.
     Pharmacol. 29:111,  1974.   (Abstr.  #92.)
 013AS3/B                            8-14                          June 1983

-------
Mushak, P. K.  Dussauer and E. L. Walls.  Flameless atomic absorption (FAA) and
     gas-liquid chromatographic studies in  arsenic bioanalysis.   Environ.
     Hlth. Persp.  19: 5-10, 1977.

Nadeyenko, V.  G. ,  V.  G.  Lenchenko, S.  B.  Genkina, and T. A.  Arkhipenko.
     Influence of  tungsten,  molybdenum, copper  and arsenic in  intrauterine
     development of  the fetus.  TR-79-0353.   Farmakologiya i Toksikologiya
     41:620-623,  1978.

Nagamatsu, K., and A.  Igata.   Dominant and  non-dominant arsenical  neuropathy.
     TR-79-0523,  Kagoshim University.  Rinsho Shinkei 15:1-4, 1975.

Nakamura, I.,  T. Arao,  K.  Inoue, T. Ono, Y. Ishii, T.  Sato, K.  Kawakami, and
     H. Kuwahara.   Study  on  the effect  of  arsenic on  human bodies, Part I.
     Japanese  Public  Health  Association  (Translated for EPA by SCITRAN,  Santa
     Barbara, Calif., EPA translation No. TR-120), 1973.

Nakamuro, M.,  and  Y.  Sayato.   Comparative  studies of chromosomal  aberration
     induced by trivalent and pentavalent arsenic.  Mutat.  Res.  88:7380, 1981.

National Academy of Sciences.   Arsenic.  National  Academy of Sciences, Washington,
     DC, 1977.

National  Institute for  Occupational  Safety  and Health.   Criteria for a Recom-
     mended Standard	   Occupational  Exposure  to Inorganic Arsenic.  New
     Criteria - 1975.   HEW Publication No.  (NIOSH) 75-149,  U.S.  Department  of
     Health, Education, and Welfare, Washington, DC, 1976.

Natusch,  D. F. S., J.  R. Wallace,  and  C. A.  Evans, Jr.   Toxic trace elements:
     Preferential  concentration  in respirable particles.  Science  183:202-204,
     1974.

Nelson, H. A. , M.  R. Crane, and K.  Tomson.  Inorganic  arsenic  poisoning in
     pastured  feeder  lambs.   J. Amer.  Vet.   Med.  Assoc. 158:1943-1945, 1971.

Nelson, W. C., M.  H.   Lykins, J.  Mackey, V.   A. Newill, J. F. Finklea, and D.  I.
     Hammer.    Mortality among  orchard  workers  exposed to lead arsenate spray:
     a cohort study.   J. Chronic. Dis. 26:105-118,  1973.

Neubauer, 0.   Arsenical cancer:  a review.   Br.  J.  Cancer 1:192-251, 1947.

Newman, J. A., V.  E. Archer,  G. Saccomanno, M.  Kuschner,  0.  Auerbach, R.  D.
     Grondahl, and J. C. Wilson.  Histological types of bronchogenic carcinoma
     among members of copper-mining and smelting  communities.   Ln:  Occupa-
     tional Carcinogenesis,  Proceedings  of  a Conference, New York Academy of
     Sciences, New  York,  New  York, March   24-27,  1975.   Ann.  NY  Acad.  Sci
     271:260-268,  1976.

Nielsen,  F. H. , D. R. Myron, and E.  0.  Uthus.   Newer trace elements—vanadium
     (V)  and  arsenic (As)  deficiency signs  and possible metabolic roles, In:
     Trace Element Metabolism  in Man and Animals,  Vol. 3, M.  Kirchgessner,
     ed., Arbeitskreses fur  Tierernahrungsforschung, Weikenstephen, Germany,
     1978.  pp. 244-247.


013AS3/B                           8-15                          June  1983

-------
Nielsen, I.  H.,  S.  H.  Givand, and D.  R.  Myron.   Evidence of a possible require-
     ment for arsenic by the rat.  Fed.  Proc. 34:923, 1974.

Nishioka, H. Mutagenic  activities of metal  compounds  in  bacteria.  Mutat.  Res.
     31: 185-189, 1975

Nordenson,  I., G.  Beckman,  L.  Beckman,  and  S.  Nordstrom.   Occupational  and
     environmental   risks  in and around a  smelter in northern Sweden.   II.
     Chromosomal  aberrations in  workers   exposed to  arsenic.   Hereditas
     88:47-50, 1978.

Nordenson,  I., S. Salmonsson, E. Brun, and G. Beckman.  Chromosome aberrations
     in psoriatic  patients  treated  with arsenic.  Hum.  Genet. 48:1-8, 1979.

Nordstrom,  S., L.  Beckman,  and I. Nordenson.  Occupational and environmental
     risks  in  and   around  a smelter in northern  Sweden.   I.  Variations  in
     Birthweight.  Hereditas 88:43-46, 1978a.

Nordstrom,  S. , L.  Beckman,  and I. Nordenson.  Occupational and Environmental
     risks  in and  around  a  smelter  in northern  Sweden.   Hereditas  90:291-296,
     1978b.

Nordstrom,  S. , L.  Beckman,  and I. Nordenson.  Occupational and Environmental
     risks  in and  around  a  smelter in northern Sweden.  VI.  Congenital  Mal-
     formations.   Hereditas  90:297-302, 1978c.

Nordstrom,  S. , L.  Beckman,  and I. Nordenson.  Occupational and environmental
     risks  in and  around  a  smelter in northern Sweden.  III.  Frequencies of
     spontaneous abortion.   Hereditas 88:51-54, 1978d.

Nurse,  D. S.   Hazards of inorganic arsenic.   Med.  J. Australia  1:102,  1978.

Occupational  Safety  and  Health Administration.  Occupational  exposure  to
     inorganic arsenic:   Final  standard.    (43  FR 19589,  May 5,  1978; 29 CFR
     1910.1018), 1978.

Odanaka,  Y. ,  0.  Matano, and S.  Goto.   Identification of dimethylated arsenic
     by gas  chromotography-mass  spectrometry in  blood urine,  and feces of rats
     treated  with  ferric  methanearesonate.  J.  Agric.  Food Chem.  26:505-507,
     1978.

Ohta,  M.   Ultra-structure of sural nerve  in a case of arsenical  neuropathy.
     Acta Neuropathol.  (Berl.)  16:233-242,  1970.

Okamura,  K., T.  Ota,  K. Horiuchi, H.  Hiroshima, T.  Takai,  Y. Sakurane,  and T.
     Baba.   Symposium on  arsenic poisoning by  powdered milk.  (2). Diagnos.
     Ther.  (Shinryo)  9:240-249,  1956.   (In Japanese)

Oppenheim,  J.  J. ,   and  W.  N. Fischbein.   Induction of  chromosome  breaks in
     cultured  normal  human  leukocytes  by  potassium arsenite, hydroxyurea and
     related compounds.   Cancer Res.  25:980, 1965.
 013AS3/B                           8-16                          June 1983

-------
Osato,  K.   Effects of  oral  administration  of  arsenic trioxide during  the
     suckling stage of rats.   Fukuoka Acta Med. 68:464-491, 1977.

O'Shaughnessy, E.,  and  G.  H. Kraft.  Arsenic poisoning:   Long-term  follow-up
     of a nonfatal case.  Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 57:403-406,  1976.

Osswald, H.,  and  K. I.  Goerttler.   Leukosen  bei  der Maus nach diaplacent arei
     und post natalei  Arsenic-application.   Verh.  Dtsch. Ges.  Pathal.  55:289-293,
     1971.

Ott, M.  G.,  B.  B. Holder, and  H.  I.  Gordon.  Respiratory cancer and occupa-
     tional  exposure  to arsenicals.  Arch.  Environ. Health 29:250-255,  1974.

Overby,  L.  R. ,  and R.  L.  Fredrickson.   Metabolic  stability  of radioactive
     arsanilic acid in  chickens.   J.  Agric. Food  Chem.   11:378-381,  1963.

Paton,  G.  R.  and A. C.  Allison.   Chromosome damage in  human cell  cultrues
     induced by metal  salts.   Mutat. Res.  16:332-336,  1972.

Pelfrene, A.  Arsenic and cancer:   the still unanswered  question.  J.  Toxicol.
     Environ. Health 1:1003-1016,  1976.

Penrose, W.  R.,  H.  B. S. Conacher, R. Black, J. C. Meranger,  W. Miles,  H. M.
     Cunningham,  and W.  R. Squires.  Implications  of inorganic/ organic  inter-
     conversion  on  fluxes of  arsenic in  marine  food  webs.    Environ  Hlth.
     Persp.  19:53-59,  1977.

Peoples, S.  A.  Arsenic  toxicity in cattle.  Ann.  N.Y. Acad.  Sci. 111:644-649,
     1964.

Perry,  K.,  R.  G.  Bowler, H.  M. Buckell, H.  A. Druett, and R.  S. F.  Shilling.
     Studies  in  the incidence of  cancer  in  a factory  handling inorganic com-
     pounds  of arsenic.   II.   Clinical  and Environmental Investigations.  Br.
     J.  Ind. Med. 5:6-15, 1948.

Pershagen, G.  Lung cancer mortality, occupational  exposure and smoking  habits
     in  a  region surrounding a smeltery.   I_n:   Proceedings  from an interna-
     tional  symposium  on the control  of  air pollution  in the working environ-
     ment, Stockholm,  6-8 September 1977,  Geneva,  International  Labour Office,
     1978.

Pershagen, G., and  M.  Vahter.  Arsenic.   A  toxicological  and epidemiological
     appraisal.    Libertryck, Stockholm, Sweden, SNV PM-1128,  1979.

Pershagen, G. , C.-G.  Elinder, and  A.-M Bolander.   Mortality  in a region sur-
     rounding an  arsenic emitting  plant.   Environ.  Health  Perspect.  19:133-137,
     1977.                                                            ~~

Pershagen,  G., B.  Lind and  N-E. Bjorklund.   Lung retention  and toxicity of
     some inorganic arsenic  compounds.  Environ. Res.  29:425-434, 1982.

Petres,  J.,  and  A.  Berger.   Zum Einfluss  anorganischen arsens  auf  die  DNS-
     synthese  menschlicher  lymphocyten   in  vitro.  Arch. Derm.  Forsch.
     242:343-352, 1972.


013AS3/B                            8-17                          June  1983

-------
Petres, J. , and  M.  Hundieker.   [Chromosome pulverization induced i_n vitro in
     cell  cultures  by  sodium diarsonate.]   Arch.  Klin.  Exp.  Dermatol.
     231:366-370, 1968.

Petres, J. , D.  Baron, and M. Hagedorn.  Effects of arsenic cell metabolism and
     cell  proliferation:    cytogenetic  and biochemical  studies.   Environ.
     Health Perspect. 19:223-227, 1977.

Petres,  J. ,  K.  Schmidt-Ullrich,  and U. Wolf.   Chromosomenaberrationen an
     Menschlichen  lymphozyten bei  chronischen Arsenchader.   Dtsch.  Med.
     Wochenschr.   95:79, 1970.

Pimentel, J.  C.,  and F.  Marques.   Vineyard Sprayer's Lung.  A  New Occupational
     Disease.   Thorax 24:678-688, 1969.

Pinto,  S.  S.,  and  B. M.  Bennett.  Effect of  arsenic  trioxide exposure on
     mortality.   Arch.  Environ. Health 7:583-591, 1963.

Pinto,  S.  S., and C. M. McGill.   Arsenic trioxide  exposure  in  industry.   Ind.
     Med. Surg.  22:281-287, 1953.

Pinto,  S.  S.,  M. 0. Varner,  K.  W.  Nelson, A.  L.  Labbe, and  L.  D.  White.
     Arsenic trioxide abosrption  and excretion in  industry.   J.  Occup.  Med.
     18:677-680,  1976.

Pinto,  S.  S. ,  P. E. Enterline,  V.  Henderson  and  M.  0.  Varner.  Mortality
     experience in relation to a measured arsenic trioxide exposure.   Environ.
     Health Perspect. 19:127-130, 1977.

Pinto,  S.  S.,  V. Henderson,  and  P.  E.  Enterline.   Mortality  experience of
     arsenic - exposed  workers.   Arch.  Environ.   Health 33:325-331,  1978.

Poma, K., N.  Degraene,  M.  Kirsch-Volders, and  C. Susanne.  Cytogenetic analysis
     of  bone marrow cells  and spermatogonia  of male mice after J_n vivo treat-
     ment with arsenic.   Experientia  37:129-130, 1981.

Popper, H., L.  B. Thomas, N. C. Telles, H.  Falk, and I.  J. Selikoff.   Develop-
     ment of hepatic angiosarcoma in  man induced by vinyl chloride,  thorotrast
     and arsenic.  Am.  J.  Pathol. 92:349-376,  1978.

Prystowsky, S.  D., G. J. Elfenbein, and S.  I.  Lamberg.   Nasopharyngeal carcinoma
     associated with long-term arsenic  ingestion.   Arch.  Dermatol. 114:602-603,
     1978.

Ray-Bettley, F., and J.  A.  O'Shea.  The absorption  of  arsenic  and its  relation
     to  carcinoma.  Br.  J.  Dermatol.  92:563-568, 1975.

Regelson,  W. ,  U. Kim,  J.   Ospina,  and J.  F.   Holland.   Hemangioendothelial
     sarcoma of  liver from chronic  arsenic intoxication by Fowler's solution.
     Cancer 12:514-522, 1968.
013AS3/B                            8-18                           June 1983

-------
Rencher, A. C.,  M.  W.  Carter, and D.  W.  McKee.   A Retrospective  Epidemio-
     logical Study  of Mortality  at a  large western  copper smelter.   J.  Occup.
     Med.  19:754-58, 1977.

Reymann, F. , R.  Miller,  and A. Nielsen.  Relationship between arsenic  intake
     and internal  malignant neoplasms.   Arch.  Dermatol.  114:378-381,  1978.

Reynolds,  E. S.   An account of  the epidemic  outbreak of  arsenical  poisoning
     occurring in  beer-drinkers  in  the north of England  and Midland  Counties
     in 1900.   Lancet 1:166-170, 1901.

Ridgeway,  L. P.,  and D.  A. Karnofsky.  The  effects of metals on  the chick
     embryo:  Toxicity and production of abnormalities in development.  Ann.
     N.Y.  Acad. Sci. 55:203-215, 1952.

Rom, W. N., G.  Varley, J.  L. Lyon and S.  Shapkow.   Lung cancer mortality among
     residents living near the El Paso smelter.  Br. J. Ind. Med. 39: 269-272,
     1982.

Rossman, T. G.,  M.  S.  Meyn, and W.  Troll.  Effects of arsenite  on  DNA  repair
     in Escherechia coli.  Environ.  Health Perspect. 19:229-233, 1977.

Rossman, T. G.,  D.  Stone, M.  Molina and  W. Troll.  Absence of arsenite muta-
     genicity  in  E.  Coli  and  Chinese  hamster  cells.   Environ.  Mut.  2:371-379,
     1980.

Rossner, P., V.  Bencko,  and H.  Havrankova.   Effect of the combined action of
     selenium and arsenic  on suspension culture of  mice fibroblasts.  Environ.
     Hlth.   Persp. 19:235-237, 1977.

Roth,  F.  The sequelae of  chronic arsenic poisoning in Moselle Vintners.  Ger.
     Med.  Mon. 2:172-175,  1957.   Roth F.  Uber den Bronchialkrebs Arsengescho-
     digter Winzer.  Virchows Arch.  331:119-137, 1958.

Rozenshtein, I. S.  Sanitary toxicological assessment of  low concentrations  of
     arsenic trioxide  in the  atmosphere.   Hyg. Sanit. (USSR) 34:16-22, 1970.

Sabbioni,  E.,  E.  Marafonte,  F.  Bertolero, and  V.  Foa.   Inorganic  arsenic:
     metabolic patterns  and identification of arsenic binding  components in
     the rabbit.   Proc.   Int.   Conf.  Management Control Heavy Metals  in the
     Environment.   London, 1979.  Pp.  18-21.

Schrauzer,  G.  N. ,  and D.  Ishmael.  Effects of selenium and of arsenic  on the
     genesis of  spontaneous  mammary tumors in  inbred C,H mice.   Ann.  Clin.
     Lab.  Sci. 4:441-447,  1974.                         *

Schrauzer,  G.  N.,  D.  A.  White,  and C. J. Schneider.  Cancer mortality  corre-
     lation studies.   IV.   Associations  with dietary  intake and blood  levels
     of certain trace elements,  notably selenium  antagonists.  Bioinorg.  Chem.
     7:35-36, 1977.
013AS3/B                           8-19                           June  1983

-------
Schrauzer, G. N., D. A. White, J. E. McGinness, and  C. J.  Schneider.  Arsenic
     and cancer:  effects of joint administration  of arsenite  and  selenite  on
     the  genesis  of mammary adenocarcinoma in inbred  female  C^H/St mice.
     Bioinorg.  Chem. 9:245-253, 1978.                           J

Schroeder, H. A., M. Mitchener.  Toxic effects of trace elements on the repro-
     duction of mice and rats.   Arch. Environ. Health 23:102-106, 1971.

Schwartz, K.  Essentiality versus toxicity of metals.  In:  Clinical Chemistry
     and Chemical Toxicology of  Metals,  S. S.  Brown, elT,  Vol.  1,  Elsevier,
     Amsterdam, 1977.   pp. 3-22.

Selby, L. A.,  A.  A. Case, G.  D.  Osweiler, and H.  M. Hayes, Jr.  Epidemiology
     and toxicology of  arsenic poisoning  in domestic animals.   Environ.  Hlth.
     Persp.  19:183-189, 1977.

Silver, A.  S.,  and  P.  L.  Wainman.  Chronic arsenic poisoning  following  use  of
     an asthma remedy.   J.A.M.A.  150:584-585, 1952.

Small, H. and  C.  McCants.   Residual  arsenic in  soils and  concentration  in to-
     bacco.   Tobacco Sci.  6:34-36, 1962.

Smith, T. J., D. J.  Eatough, L. D. Hansen, and N.   F. Mangelsen.  The chemistry
     of  sulfur  and  arsenic in airborne copper  smelter particulates.  Bull.
     Environ. Contam.  Toxicol.  15:651-659, 1976.

Smith, T. J. ,  E.  A. Crecelius, and J. C.   Reading.   Airborne arsenic exposure
     and  excretion  of methylated arsenic  compounds.  Environ. Hlth. Persp.
     19:89-93, 1977.

Sommers, S.  C., and R.  G.  McManus.  Multiple arsenical cancers of  the skin  and
     internal organs.   Cancer  6:347-359, 1953.

Southwick,  J. ,  A. Western,  M.  Beck,  T. Whitley,  R.  Isaacs, J.  Petajan,  and C.
     Hansen.   Community health associated with arsenic  in drinking water in
     Millard County, Utah.  Health  Effects Research Laboratory, U.S.  Environ-
     mental Protection Agency, Cincinnati,  Ohio.   EPA Report No.  EPA-600/1-81-064.
     Available  from:  NTIS, Springfield, VA;  PB82-108374.   1981.

Sram,  R.  and V.  Bencko.   A contribution  for the elevation of the genetic risk
     of exposure  to arsenic.   Cs. Hyg. 19:  308-315,  1974.

Sunderman,  F.  W. , Jr.   A review  of  the carcinogenicities  of  nickel, chromium
     and  arsenic compounds in man and  animals.   Preventive Med.  5:279-294,
     1976.

Suta,  B.  E.   Human exposure to atmospheric arsenic.  Final  Report.  Stanford
     Research  Institute CRESS  Rpt.  No. 50,  EPA Contract No.  68-01-4314  and
     68-02-2835,  1980.

Szuler,  I.  M. , C.  N.  Williams,  J.  T.  Hindmarsh,  and  P.-D.  Hosoon.  Massive
     variceal  hemorrhage  secondary to presinusordal  portal  hypertension  due to
     arsenic poisoning.   CMA J. 120:168-171,  1979.
 013AS3/B                            8-20                          June 1983

-------
Talmi, Y., and  D.  T.  Bostick.  The  determination  of  arsenic  and arsenicals.
     J.  Chromatogr. Sci. 13:231-237, 1975.

Tarn, K.H., S. M. Charbonneau, F. Bryce, and G. Lacroix.  Separation of arsenic
     metabolites in dog plasma and urine following  intravenous  injection of
     74As.  Anal. Biochem. 86:505-511, 1978a.

Tarn, K.  H.,  S.  M.   Charbonneau, E.  Bryce,  and G.  La  Crqix.   Metabolism of
     inorganic  arsenic  (74As) in humans  following oral  ingestion.   Toxicol.
     Appl. Pharmacol.  50:319-322, 1979b.

Tarn, K.  H.,  S.  M.  Charbonneau, G.  Lacroix,  and F. Bryce.  Confirmation of
     inorganic  arsenic  and dimethylarsinic  acid in urine and  plasma of dog by
     ion-exchange  and TLC.   Bull.  Environ.  Contam.  Toxicol. 21:371-374,  1979.

Tamura,  S.  Study of arsenic  metabolism  (Report 20) - influence  of arsenic
     agents  on  the brain  of  rats  in the developmental  stage.   TR-79-0356.
     Folia pharmacol.  japon.  74:1-14, 1978.

Tay, C.-H,  and  C,-S Seah.  Arsenic poisoning  from anti-asthmatic herbal  pre-
     parations.   Med.  J. Aust. 2:424-428, 1975.

Terada,  H.,  K.   Katsuta,  T.  Sasakawa, T. Saito, H.  Shrota,  K. Fukuchi,  E.
     Sekiya, Y.  Yokoyama,  S.  Hirokawa,  G. Watanabe,  K. Hasegawa, J. 0.  Shina,
     and  E. Sekiguchi.  Clinical observations  of chronice toxicosis by arsenic
     Ninon rinsho  18:2394-2403 (EPA Tr. No. TR106-74), 1960.

Terada,  H.   Clinical  observation  of chronic  toxicosis  by arsenic.   Ninon
     Rinsho 18:118-127, 1960.

Thomas,  M.D.,  and T.  R.  Collier.   The concentration  of arsenic  in tobacco
     smoke determined by a rapid titrimetric  method.  J. Ind. Hyg.   Toxicol.
     27:201-206, 1945.

Thompson,  R.  J.   The collection  and measurement of  airborne  arsenic.   WHO
     Publ. Air  Pollut.  Meas.  Tech. Part  II, 126-131,  1976.

Tokanehara,  S.,  S.  Akao, and  S. Tagaya.  Blood  findings  in infantile arsenic
     toxicoses  caused  by  powdered milk.   Shorn'ka  ninsho 9:1078-1084, 1956.
     (EPA translation No.  TR  110-74).

Tokudome,  S. , and M.  Kuratsune.  A  cohort  study on mortality  from  cancer and
     other causes  among workers at a  metal  refinery.   Int. J.  Cancer  17:310-317,
     1976.

Tseng,  W. P.    Effects and dose-response relationships of skin  cancer  and
     Blackfoot  disease  with arsenic.  Environ.  Health  Perspect. 19:109-119,
     1977.                                                        —

Tseng, W. P., H. M. Chu, S. W. How, J. M. Fong,  C. S.  Lin, and S. Yeh.   Preva-
     lence  of  skin cancer  in an  endemic area of  chronic  arsenalicalism in
     Taiwan.  J. Natl.  Cancer Inst. 40:453-463,  1968.
013AS3/B                           8-21                           June  1983

-------
Tsutsumi, S. , and  K.  Kato.   Effects of  dimercaprol  or thioctic acid on the
     distribution  and  excretion of  74As in rats.   Bui.  Tokyo Dent. Coll.
     16:69-74, 1975.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.  Ambient Water Quality Criteria Document
     for Arsenic.  Cincinnati, OH.   1980.

U.S. Public  Health Service:   Drinking Water Standards  1962.   PHS Publ. No.
     956, Washington, DC, 1962.  66 pp.

Uldall, P.,  H.  Khan, J.  Ennis,  R.  McCallum  and  T.  Grimson.   Renal  damage from
     industrial arsine poisoning.  B. J. Ind. Med. 27:372-377,  1970.

Underwood,  E.  J.   Trace  Elements  in  Human and Animal Nutrition,  4th  ed.
     Academic Press, N.Y., 1977.

Union Carbide Corporation, Review  of the Environmental  Effects  of  Arsenic,  Oak
     Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge,  Tenn.   ORNL/EIS-79,  1977.

Urakabo, G.,  A.  Hasegawa, and S.  Nakaura.   Studies  on the fate of poisonous
     metals  in  experimental  animal  (V).   Body  retention and  excretion  of
     arsenic.   J.  Food Hyg.  Soc.  Jpn.  16:334-336, 1975.   (In  Japanese  with
     English  summary.)

Uthus,  E.,  W.  Cornatzer and  F. Nielsen.  Consequences  of arsenic  deprivation
     in  laboratory  animals.   In:    Arsenic:    Industrial,  Biomedical  and
     Environmental  Perspectives.   W.  Lederu and  R.  Fensterheim,  eds.,  1982.

Vahter,  M.   Biotransformation of  trivalent and pentavalent  inorganic arsenic
     in mice  and  rats.   Environ. Res.  25:286-293,  1981.
                                          74
Vahter,  M. ,  and H. Norin.  Metabolism of   As-labeled trivalent  and pentava-
     lent inorganic arsenic in mice.   Environ.  Res.  21:446-457, 1980.

Valentine,  J. ,  H.  Kang, and  G.  Spivey.  Arsenic  levels in human  blood, urine
     and  hair  in  response  to  exposure via drinking water.   Environ.  Res.
     20:24-32,  1979.

Vallee,  B.   L.,  D.  D.  Ulmer,  and  W.  E.  C.  Wacker.  Arsenic  toxicology and
     biochemistry.  Arch. Ind.  Health  21:132-151,  1960.

Villar,  T.  G.  Vineyard  Sprayer's Lung.   Clinical Aspects.   Am.  Rev.  Resp.
     Dis.   110:545-555,  1974.

Walsh,  L.  M. ,  and D.  R. Keeney.   Behavior and phytotoxicity of inorganic
     arsenicals in soils, J_n:   Arsenic Pesticides,  ACS  Symp.  Series 7, Am.
     Chem.  Soc.,  Washington,  DC, 1975.   p.  35.

Walsh,  L.  M. , M.  E. Sumner, arid D. R.  Keeney.  Occurrence and  distribution of
     arsenic in soils and  plants.   Environ.  Health Perspect.  19:67-72, 1977.

Walsh,  P.  R. ,  R.  A.  Duce,  and J.  L.  Fasching.  A sampling technique for the
     determination of particulate and vapor  phase arsenic in the atmosphere.
     Air Pollut.  Meas.  Tech.,  Part  II, Publ. World Meteorol.  Org.  No. 460,
     140-149, 1977.

013AS3/B                           8-22                          June 1983

-------
Welch, K., I. Higgins, M. Oh, and C. Burchfiel.  Arsenic exposure, smoking and
     respiratory cancer in copper smelter workers.  Arch. Env. Hlth. 37:325-335,
     1982.

Westhoff, D.  D. ,  J.  R.  Samaha, and A. Barnes, Jr.  Arsenic intoxication as a
     cause of mega!obiastic anemia.  Blood 45:241-246, 1975.

Westoo, G., and M. Rydalv.  Arsenic levels in  foods.  Var Foda 24:21-40, 1972.
     (In Swedish with English summary.)

Whanger, P.  D.,  P.  H. Weswig, and  J.  C.  Stoner.  Arsenic  levels  in Oregon
     waters.  Environ. Health Perspect. 19:139-143, 1977.

Whittemore, A. S.  The age distribution of human cancer  for carcinogenic expo-
     sures of varying intensity.  Am. J. Epidemiol. 106:418-423, 1977.

Wildenberg,  J.   An assessment  of experimental carcinogen-detecting systems
     with special reference to inorganic arsenicals.  Environ. Res.  16:139-152,
     1978.

Willhite, C.  C.   Arsenic-induced axial skeletal (dysraphic)  disorders.  Exp.
     Mol. Pathol. 34:145-158, 1981.

Winkler, W. 0.   Identification and  estimation  of the  arsenic  residue in  livers
     of  rats  ingesting arsenicals.  J. Assoc.  Off. Anal. Chem. 45:80-91, 1962.

Wood, J. M.   Biological cycles for  toxic elements  in  the environment.  Science
     183:1049-1052, 1974.

Woods,  J.  S., and B.  A.  Fowler.   Effects  of chronic arsenic exposure on hema-
     topoietic  function  in  adult mammalian  liver.   Environ. Hlth. Persp.
     19:209-213,  1977.

Woolson,  E.  A.   Fate of arsenicals in different  environmental  substrates.
     Environ. Health  Perspect. 19:73-81, 1977.

Woolson,  E.  A.   Generation of dimethylarsine  from soil.  Paper presented at
     16th.  Meeting, Weed Science Society of  America, 1976.   Paper  No.  218.

World  Health  Organization.   Environmental  Health Criteria  18:   Arsenic.
     International Programme on Chemical Safety, Geneva, 1981.

Yamashita,  N. ,  D. Makoto, M. Nishio,  H. Hojo, and M. Tanaka  Masato.   Current
     state  of Kyoto  children poisoned by  arsenic  tainted morinaga dry milk.
     TR-74-108.   Ninon  eiseigaku  zasshi  [Japanese J. of Hyg.]  27:364-399,
     1972.

Yamauchi, H. ,  and Y.  Yamamura.   Urinary inorganic arsenic  and methyl  arsenic
     excretion following arsenate-rich seaweed ingestion.   Jap.  J.  Ind.  Health
     21:47-54, 1979.  (Engl. summary,  Tables  and Figures).
013AS3/B                           8-23                           June 1983

-------
Yoshikawa, T. , J.  Utsumi
     Kaneko.   Concerning
     Niigata Prefecture.
 T. Okada, M. Moriuchi, N. Masana,  K. Ozawa,  and  Y.
the mass outbreak  of  chronic arsenic toxicosis in
Chiryo 42:1739-1749,  1960.
Zaldivar, R.  Arsenic  contamination of drinking water and foodstuffs causing
     endemic chronic poisoning.  Beitr. Pathol. 151:384-400, 1974.

Zaldivar, R.  Ecological  investigations on  arsenic  dietary  intake and  endemic
     chronic poisoning  in man:   dose-response curve.  Zentralbl.  Bakteriol.
     Parasitenkd. Infektionskr. Hyg. Abt.  1: Orig. Reihe B.  164:481-484, 1977.

Zaldivar, R.  and A.  Guillier.  Environmental  and clinical  investigation on
     epidemic chronic  arsenic poisoning  in infants  and  children.   Zentralb.
     Bakteriol.  Parasitenkd,  Infektionskr. Hyg. Abt. 1:  Orig. Reihe B.
     165:226-234, 1977.
013AS3/B
          8-24
June 1983

-------