United States Office of Water EPA821-R-95-030
Environmental Protection Engineering and Analysis Division (4303) April 1995
Agency Washington, DC 20460
&EPA Method 1637: Determination of Trace
Elements in Ambient Waters by
Chelation Preconcentration with
Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption
I'.S. Environmental Protection Agency
region 5, Library (,r;i.-12J)
1' '-Vest Jackson Boulevard, 12th Floor
C.Mcago, IL 60604-3b90
) Printed on Recycled Paper
-------
Method 1637
Acknowledgments
Method 1637 was prepared under the direction of William A. Telliard of the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency's (EPA's) Office of Water (OW), Engineering and Analysis Division (BAD). The
method was prepared under EPA Contract 68-C3-0337 by the DynCorp Environmental Programs Division
with assistance from Interface, Inc.
The following researchers in marine chemistry contributed to the philosophy behind this method. Their
contribution is gratefully acknowledged:
Shier Berman, National Research Council, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Nicholas Bloom, Frontier Geosciences Inc., Seattle, Washington
Paul Boothe and Gary Steinmetz, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas
Eric Crecelius, Battelle Marine Sciences Laboratory, Sequim, Washington
Russell Flegal, University of California/Santa Cruz, California
Gary Gill, Texas A&M University at Galveston, Texas
Carlton Hunt and Dion Lewis, Battelle Ocean Sciences, Duxbury, Massachusetts
Carl Watras, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Boulder Junction, Wisconsin
Herb Windom and Ralph Smith, Skidaway Institute of Oceanography, Savannah, Georgia
In addition, J.T. Creed and T.D. Martin of the EPA Office of Research and Development's Environmental
Monitoring Systems Laboratory in Cincinnati, Ohio, are gratefully acknowledged for the development of
the analytical procedures described in this method.
Disclaimer
This method has been reviewed and approved for publication by the Engineering and Analysis Division
of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not
constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.
Questions concerning this method or its application should be addressed to:
W.A. Telliard
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Water
Analytical Methods Staff
Mail Code 4303
401 M Street SW
Washington, DC 20460
202/260-7120
April 1995
-------
Method 1637
Introduction
This analytical method was designed to support water quality monitoring programs authorized under the
Clean Water Act. Section 304(a) of the Clean Water Act requires EPA to publish water quality criteria
that reflect the latest scientific knowledge concerning the physical fate (e.g., concentration and dispersal)
of pollutants, the effects of pollutants on ecological and human health, and the effect of pollutants on
biological community diversity, productivity, and stability.
Section 303 of the Clean Water Act requires states to set a water quality standard for each body of water
within its boundaries. A state water quality standard consists of a designated use or uses of a waterbody
or a segment of a waterbody, the water quality criteria that are necessary to protect the designated use or
uses, and an antidegradation policy. These water quality standards serve two purposes: (1) they establish
the water quality goals for a specific waterbody, and (2) they are the basis for establishing water quality-
based treatment controls and strategies beyond the technology-based controls required by Sections 301(b)
and 306 of the Clean Water Act.
In defining water quality standards, the state may use narrative criteria, numeric criteria, or both.
However, the 1987 amendments to the Clean Water Act required states to adopt numeric criteria for toxic
pollutants (designated in Section 307(a) of the Act) based on EPA Section 304(a) criteria or other
scientific data, when the discharge or presence of those toxic pollutants could reasonably be expected to
interfere with designated uses.
In some cases, these water quality criteria are as much as 280 times lower than those achievable using
existing EPA methods and required to support technology-based permits. Therefore, EPA developed new
sampling and analysis methods to specifically address state needs for measuring toxic metals at water
quality criteria levels, when such measurements are necessary to protect designated uses in state water
quality standards. The latest criteria published by EPA are those listed in the National Toxics Rule (57
FR 60848). This rule includes water quality criteria for 13 metals, and it is these criteria on which the
new sampling and analysis methods are based. Method 1637 was specifically developed to provide
reliable measurements of two of these metals at EPA WQC levels using off-line chelation preconcentration
and stabilized temperature graphite furnace atomic absorption techniques.
In developing these methods, EPA found that one of the greatest difficulties in measuring pollutants at
these levels was precluding sample contamination during collection, transport, and analysis. The degree
of difficulty, however, is highly dependent on the metal and site-specific conditions. This analytical
method, therefore, is designed to provide the level of protection necessary to preclude contamination in
nearly all situations. It is also designed to provide the procedures necessary to produce reliable results
at the lowest possible water quality criteria published by EPA. In recognition of the variety of situations
to which this method may be applied, and in recognition of continuing technological advances, the method
is performance based. Alternative procedures may be used, so long as those procedures are demonstrated
to yield reliable results.
Requests for additional copies should be directed to:
U.S. EPA NCEPI
11029 Kenwood Road
Cincinnati, OH 45242
513/489-8190
April 1995 in
-------
Method 1637
Note: This method is intended to be performance based, and the laboratory is permitted to omit any
step or modify any procedure provided that all performance requirements set forth in this method
are met. The laboratory is not allowed to omit any quality control analyses. The terms "must,"
"may," and "should" are included throughout this method and are intended to illustrate the
importance of the procedures in producing verifiable data at water quality criteria levels. The term
"must" is used to indicate that researchers in trace metals analysis have found certain procedures
essential in successfully analyzing samples and avoiding contamination; however, these procedure
can be modified or omitted if the laboratory can demonstrate that data quality is not affected.
iv April 1995
-------
Method 1637
Method 1637
Determination of Trace Elements in Ambient Waters
by Off-Line Chelation Preconcentration and Stabilized
Temperature Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption
1.0 Scope and Application
1.1 This method provides procedures for the determination of dissolved elements in ambient waters
at EPA water quality criteria (WQC) levels using off-line chelation preconcentration and stabilized
temperature graphite furnace atomic absorption (GFAA). It may also be used for determination
of total recoverable element concentrations in these waters. This method was developed by
integrating the analytical procedures in EPA Method 200.13 with the stringent quality control
(QC) and sample handling procedures necessary to avoid contamination and ensure the validity
of analytical results during sampling and analysis for metals at EPA WQC levels. This method
contains QC procedures that will ensure that contamination will be detected when blanks
accompanying samples are analyzed. This method is accompanied by Method 1669: Sampling
Ambient Water for Determination of Trace Metals at EPA Water Quality Criteria Levels (the
"Sampling Method"). The Sampling Method is necessary to ensure that contamination will not
compromise trace metals determinations during the sampling process.
1.2 This method is applicable to the following analytes:
Analyte
Cadmium
Lead
Symbol
(Cd)
(Pb)
Chemical Abstract Services
Registry Number (CASRN)
7440-43-9
7439-92-1
Table 1 lists the EPA WQC levels, the method detection limit (MDL) for each metal, and the
minimum level (ML) set for each metal in this method. Instrument operating conditions for the
applicable elements are listed in Table 3. These are intended as a guide and are typical of a
system optimized for the element employing commercial instrumentation. However, actual linear
working ranges will be dependent on the sample matrix, instrumentation, and selected operating
conditions.
1.3 This method is not intended for determination of metals at concentrations normally found in
treated and untreated discharges from industrial facilities. Existing regulations (40 CFR Parts
400-500) typically limit concentrations in industrial discharges to the mid to high part-per-billion
(ppb) range, whereas ambient metals concentrations are normally in the low part-per-trillion (ppt)
to low ppb range.
1.4 The ease of contaminating ambient water samples with the metal(s) of interest and interfering
substances cannot be overemphasized. This method includes suggestions for improvements in
April 1995
-------
Method 1637
facilities and analytical techniques that should maximize the ability of the laboratory to make
reliable trace metals determinations and minimize contamination. These suggestions are given in
Section 4.0 and are based on findings of researchers performing trace metals analyses (References
1-8). Additional suggestions for improvement of existing facilities may be found in EPA's
Guidance for Establishing Trace Metals Clean Rooms in Existing Facilities, which is available
from the EPA National Center for Environmental Publications and Information (NCEPI) at the
address listed in the introduction to this document.
1.5 Clean and ultraclean—The terms "clean" and "ultraclean" have been applied to the techniques
needed to reduce or eliminate contamination in trace metals determinations. These terms are not
used in this method because they lack an exact definition. However, the information provided in
this method is consistent with and copied from summary guidance on clean and ultraclean
techniques (Reference 9).
1.6 This method follows the EPA Environmental Methods Management Council' s ' 'Format for Method
Documentation" (Reference 10).
1.7 This method is "performance based"; i.e., an alternate procedure or technique may be used as long
as the performance requirements in the method are met. Section 9.1.2 gives details of the tests
and documentation required to support equivalent performance.
1.8 For dissolved metal determinations, samples must be filtered through a 0.45-pm capsule filter at
the field site. The Sampling Method describes the filtering procedures. The filtered samples may
be preserved in the field or transported to the laboratory for preservation. Procedures for field
preservation are detailed in the Sampling Method; procedures for laboratory preservation are
provided in this method.
1.9 For the determination of total recoverable analy tes in ambient water samples, a digestion/extraction
is required before analysis when the elements are not in solution (e.g., aqueous samples that may
contain paniculate and suspended solids).
1.10 The sensitivity and limited linear dynamic range (LDR) of GFAA often implies the need to dilute
a sample before analysis. The actual magnitude of the dilution as well as the cleanliness of the
labware used to perform the dilution can dramatically influence the quality of the analytical
results. Therefore, sample types requiring large dilutions (>50:1) should be analyzed by an
another approved test procedure that has a larger LDR or is inherently less sensitive than GFAA.
1.11 This method should be used by analysts experienced in the use of graphite furnace atomic
absorption spectroscopy, the interpretation of spectral and matrix interferences, and procedures for
their correction, and only by personnel thoroughly trained in the handling and analysis of samples
for determination of metals at EPA WQC levels. A minimum of six months experience with
commercial instrumentation is recommended.
1.12 This method is accompanied by a data verification and validation guidance document, Guidance
on the Documentation and Evaluation of Trace Metals Data Collected for CWA Compliance
Monitoring. Before using this method, data users should state the data quality objectives (DQOs)
required for a project.
April 1995
-------
Method 1637
2.0 Summary of Method
2.1 An aliquot of a well-mixed, homogeneous aqueous sample is accurately measured for sample
processing. For total recoverable analysis of an aqueous sample containing undissolved material,
analytes are first solubilized by gentle refluxing with nitric acid. After cooling, the sample is
made up to volume, mixed, and centrifuged or allowed to settle overnight before analysis. For
the determination of dissolved analytes in a filtered aqueous sample aliquot, the sample is made
ready for analysis by the appropriate addition of nitric acid, and then diluted to a predetermined
volume and mixed before analysis.
2.2 This method is used to preconcentrate trace elements using an iminodiacetate functionalized
chelating resin (References 11 and 12). After a sample is prepared, it is buffered using an on-line
system before it enters the chelating column. Group I and II metals, as well as most anions, are
selectively separated from the analytes by elution with ammonium acetate at pH 5.5. The analytes
are subsequently eluted into a simplified matrix consisting of 0.75 M nitric acid and are
determined by stabilized temperature platform graphite furnace atomic absorption (STPGFAA).
2.3 In STPGFAA, the sample and the matrix modifier are first pipetted onto the platform or a device
that provides delayed atomization. The furnace chamber is then purged with a continuous flow
of a premixed gas (95% argon-5% hydrogen) and the sample is dried at a relatively low
temperature (about 120°C) to avoid spattering. Once dried, the sample is pretreated in a char or
ashing step that is designed to minimize the interference effects caused by the concomitant sample
matrix. After the char step, the furnace is allowed to cool before atomization. The atomization
cycle is characterized by rapid heating of the furnace to a temperature at which the metal (analyte)
is atomized from the pyrolytic graphite surface into a stopped gas flow atmosphere of argon
containing 5% hydrogen. The resulting atomic cloud absorbs the element specific atomic emission
produced by a hollow cathode lamp (HCL) or an electrodeless discharge lamp (EDL). After
analysis, the furnace is subjected to a cleanout period of high temperature and continuous argon
flow. Because the resulting absorbance usually has a nonspecific component associated with the
actual analyte absorbance, an instrumental background correction device is required to subtract
from the total signal the component that is nonspecific to the analyte. In the absence of
interferences, the background corrected absorbance is directly related to the concentration of the
analyte. Interferences relating to STPGFAA (Section 4.0) must be recognized and corrected.
Suppressions or enhancements of instrument response caused by the sample matrix must be
corrected by the method of standard addition (Section 12.6).
3.0 Definitions
3.1 Apparatus—Throughout this method, the sample containers, sampling devices, instrumentation,
and all other materials and devices used in sample collection, sample processing, and sample
analysis activities will be referred to collectively as the Apparatus.
3.2 Other definitions of terms are given in the glossary (Section 18) at the end of this method.
April 1995
-------
Method 1637
4.0 Contamination and Interferences
4.1 Preventing ambient water samples from becoming contaminated during the sampling and analytical
process constitutes one of the greatest difficulties encountered with trace metals determinations.
Over the last two decades, marine chemists have come to recognize that much of the historical
data on the concentrations of dissolved trace metals in seawater are erroneously high because the
concentrations reflect contamination from sampling and analysis rather than ambient levels. More
recently, historical trace metals data collected from freshwater rivers and streams have been shown
to be similarly biased because of contamination during sampling and analysis (Reference 13).
Therefore, it is imperative that extreme care be taken to avoid contamination when collecting and
analyzing ambient water samples for trace metals.
4.2 Samples may become contaminated by numerous routes. Potential sources of trace metals
contamination during sampling include metallic or metal-containing labware (e.g., talc gloves
which contain high levels of zinc), containers, sampling equipment, reagents, and reagent water;
improperly cleaned and stored equipment, labware, and reagents; and atmospheric inputs such as
dirt and dust. Even human contact can be a source of trace metals contamination. For example,
it has been demonstrated that dental work (e.g., mercury amalgam fillings) in the mouths of
laboratory personnel can contaminate samples that are directly exposed to exhalation (Reference
3).
4.3 Contamination Control
4.3.1 Philosophy—The philosophy behind contamination control is to ensure that any object or
substance that contacts the sample is metal free and free from any material that may
contain metals.
4.3.1.1 The integrity of the results produced cannot be compromised by contamination
of samples. This method and the Sampling Method give requirements and
suggestions for controlling sample contamination.
4.3.1.2 Substances in a sample cannot be allowed to contaminate the laboratory work area
or instrumentation used for trace metals measurements. This method gives
requirements and suggestions for protecting the laboratory.
4.3.1.3 Although contamination control is essential, personnel health and safety remain
the highest priority. The Sampling Method and Section 5 of this method give
requirements and suggestions for personnel safety.
4.3.2 Avoid contamination—The best way to control contamination is to completely avoid
exposure of the sample to contamination in the first place. Avoiding exposure means
performing operations in an area known or thought to be free from contamination. Two
of the most important factors in avoiding/reducing sample contamination are (1) an
awareness of potential sources of contamination and (2) strict attention to work being
done. Therefore, it is imperative that the procedures described in this method be carried
out by well-trained, experienced personnel.
April 1995
-------
Method 1637
be performed in a class 100 clean bench or a nonmetal glove box fed by particle-free air
or nitrogen. Digestions must be performed in a nonmetal fume hood, ideally situated in
the clean room.
4.3.4 Minimize exposure—The Apparatus that will contact samples, blanks, or standard
solutions must only be opened or exposed in a clean room, clean bench, or glove box so
that exposure to an uncontrolled atmosphere is minimized. When not being used, the
Apparatus should be covered with clean plastic wrap, stored in the clean bench or in a
plastic box or glove box, or bagged in clean zip-type bags. Minimizing the time between
cleaning and use will also minimize contamination.
4.3.5 Clean work surfaces—Before processing a given batch of samples, all work surfaces in
the hood, clean bench, or glove box in which the samples will be processed should be
cleaned by wiping with a lint-free cloth or wipe soaked with reagent water.
4.3.6 Wear gloves—Sampling personnel must wear clean, nontalc gloves (Section 6.10.7)
during all operations involving handling of the Apparatus, samples, and blanks. Only
clean gloves may touch the Apparatus. If another object or substance is touched, the
glove(s) must be changed before again handling the Apparatus. If it is even suspected
that gloves have become contaminated, work must be halted, the contaminated gloves
removed, and a new pair of clean gloves put on. Wearing multiple layers of clean gloves
will allow the old pair to be quickly stripped with minimal disruption to the work activity.
4.3.7 Use metal-free Apparatus—All Apparatus used for metals determinations at ambient water
quality criteria levels must be nonmetallic, free of material that may contain metals, or
both.
4.3.7.1 Construction materials—Only the following materials should come in contact with
samples: fluoropolymer (FEP, PTFE), conventional or linear polyethylene,
polycarbonate, polypropylene, polysulfone, or ultrapure quartz. PTFE is less
desirable than FEP because the sintered material in PTFE may contain
contaminates and is susceptible to serious memory contamination (Reference 6).
Fluoropolymer or glass containers should be used for samples that will be
analyzed for mercury because mercury vapors can diffuse in or out of the other
materials resulting either in contamination or low-biased results (Reference 3).
All materials, regardless of construction, that will directly or indirectly contact the
sample must be cleaned using the procedures described in Section 11 and must
be known to be clean and metal free before proceeding.
4.3.7.2 The following materials have been found to contain trace metals and must not be
used to hold liquids that come in contact with the sample or must not contact the
sample itself, unless these materials have been shown to be free of the metals of
interest at the desired level: Pyrex, Kimax, methacrylate, polyvinylchloride,
nylon, and Vycor (Reference 6). In addition, highly colored plastics, paper cap
liners, pigments used to mark increments on plastics, and rubber all contain trace
levels of metals and must be avoided (Reference 14).
4.3.7.3 Serialization—It is recommended that serial numbers be indelibly marked or
etched on each piece of Apparatus so that contamination can be traced, and
April 1995
-------
Method 1637
logbooks should be maintained to track the sample from the container through the
labware to injection into the instrument. It may be useful to dedicate separate sets
of labware to different sample types; e.g., receiving waters vs. effluents.
However, the Apparatus used for processing blanks and standards must be mixed
with the Apparatus used to process samples so that contamination of all labware
can be detected.
4.3.7.4 The laboratory or cleaning facility is responsible for cleaning the Apparatus used
by the sampling team. If there are any indications that the Apparatus is not clean
when received by the sampling team (e.g., ripped storage bags), an assessment of
the likelihood of contamination must be made. Sampling must not proceed if it
is possible that the Apparatus is contaminated. If the Apparatus is contaminated,
it must be returned to the laboratory or cleaning facility for proper cleaning before
any sampling activity resumes.
4.3.8 Avoid Sources of Contamination—Avoid contamination by being aware of potential
sources and routes of contamination.
4.3.8.1 Contamination by carryover—Contamination may occur when a sample containing
low concentrations of metals is processed immediately after a sample containing
relatively high concentrations of these metals. To reduce carryover, the sample
introduction system may be rinsed between samples with dilute acid and reagent
water. When an unusually concentrated sample is encountered, it is followed by
analysis of a laboratory blank to check for carryover. For samples containing
high levels of metals, it may be necessary to acid-clean or replace the connecting
tubing or inlet system to ensure that contamination will not affect subsequent
measurements. Samples known or suspected to contain the lowest concentration
of metals should be analyzed first followed by samples containing higher levels.
For instruments containing autosamplers, the laboratory should keep track of
which station is used for a given sample. When an unusually high concentration
of a metal is detected in a sample, the station used for that sample should be
cleaned more thoroughly to prevent contamination of subsequent samples, and the
results for subsequent samples should be checked for evidence of the metal(s) that
occurred in high concentration.
4.3.8.2 Contamination by samples—Significant laboratory or instrument contamination
may result when untreated effluents, in-process waters, landfill leachates, and
other samples containing high concentrations of inorganic substances are
processed and analyzed. As stated in Section 1.0, this method is not intended for
application to these samples, and samples containing high concentrations should
not be permitted into the clean room and laboratory dedicated for processing trace
metals samples.
4.3.8.3 Contamination by indirect contact—Apparatus that may not directly come in
contact with the samples may still be a source of contamination. For example,
clean tubing placed in a dirty plastic bag may pick up contamination from the bag
and then subsequently transfer the contamination to the sample. Therefore, it is
imperative that every piece of the Apparatus that is directly or indirectly used in
April 1995
-------
Method 1637
imperative that every piece of the Apparatus that is directly or indirectly used in
the collection, processing, and analysis of ambient water samples be cleaned as
specified in Section 11.
4.3.8.4 Contamination by airborne particulate matter—Less obvious substances capable
of contaminating samples include airborne particles. Samples may be
contaminated by airborne dust, dirt, particles, or vapors from unfiltered air
supplies; nearby corroded or rusted pipes, wires, or other fixtures; or metal-
containing paint. Whenever possible, sample processing and analysis should
occur as far as possible from sources of airborne contamination.
4.4 Interferences—Several interference sources may cause inaccuracies in the determination of trace
elements by GFAA. These interferences can be classified into three major subdivisions: spectral,
matrix, and memory. Some of these interferences can be minimized through the preconcentration
step, which reduces the Ca, Mg, Na, and chloride concentrations in the sample before GFAA
analysis.
4.4.1 Spectral interferences are caused by the absorbance of light by a molecule or atom that
is not the analyte of interest or emission from black body radiation.
4.4.1.1 Spectral interferences caused by an element only occur if there is a spectral
overlap between the wavelength of the interfering element and the analyte of
interest. Fortunately, this type of interference is relatively uncommon in
STPGFAA because of the narrow atomic line widths associated with STPGFAA.
In addition, the use of appropriate furnace temperature programs and high spectral
purity lamps as light sources can minimize the possibility of this type of
interference. However, molecular absorbances can span several hundred
nanometers, producing broadband spectral interferences. This type of interference
is far more common in STPGFAA. The use of matrix modifiers, selective
volatilization, and background correctors are all attempts to eliminate unwanted
nonspecific absorbance. Since the nonspecific component of the total absorbance
can vary considerably from sample type to sample type, to provide effective
background correction and eliminate elemental spectral interferences, the exclusive
use of Zeeman background correction is specified in this method.
4.4.1.2 Spectral interferences are also caused by black body radiation produced during the
atomization furnace cycle. This black body emission reaches the photomultiplier
tube, producing erroneous results. The magnitude of this interference can be
minimized by proper furnace tube alignment and monochromator design. In
addition, atomization temperatures that adequately volatilize the analyte of interest
without producing unnecessary black body radiation can help reduce unwanted
background emission produced during atomization.
4.4.2 Matrix interferences are caused by sample components that inhibit the formation of free
atomic analyte atoms during the atomization cycle. In this method, the use of a delayed
atomization device that provides warmer gas phase temperatures is required. These
devices provide an environment that is more conducive to the formation of free analyte
atoms and thereby minimize this type of interference. This type of interference can be
detected by analyzing the sample plus a sample aliquot fortified with a known
April 1995
-------
Method 1637
concentration of the analyte. If the determined concentration of the analyte addition is
outside a designated range, a possible matrix effect should be suspected (Section 9.3)
4.4.3 Memory interferences result from analyzing a sample containing a high concentration of
an element (typically a high atomization temperature element) that cannot be removed
quantitatively in one complete set of furnace steps. The analyte that remains in the
furnace can produce false positive signals on subsequent sample(s). Therefore, the analyst
should establish the analyte concentration that can be injected into the furnace and
adequately removed in one complete set of furnace cycles. If this concentration is
exceeded, the sample should be diluted and a blank analyzed to ensure the memory effect
has been eliminated before reanalyzing the diluted sample.
4.4.4 Low recoveries may be encountered in the preconcentration cycle if the trace elements are
complexed by competing chelators (humic/fulvic) in the sample or are present as colloidal
material. Acid solubilization pretreatment is used to improve analyte recovery and to
minimize adsorption, hydrolysis, and precipitation effects.
4.4.5 Memory interferences from the chelating system may be encountered, especially after
analyzing a sample containing high analyte concentrations. A thorough column rinsing
sequence following elution of the analytes is necessary to minimize such interferences.
5.0 Safety
5.1 The toxicity or carcinogenicity of reagents used in this method have not been fully established.
Each chemical should be regarded as a potential health hazard and exposure to these compounds
should be as low as reasonably achievable.
5.1.1 Each laboratory is responsible for maintaining a current awareness file of OSHA
regulations for the safe handling of the chemicals specified in this method (References
15-18). A reference file of material safety data sheets (MSDSs) should also be available
to all personnel involved in the chemical analysis. It is also suggested that the laboratory
perform personal hygiene monitoring of each analyst who uses this method and that the
results of this monitoring be made available to the analyst. The references and
bibliography at the end of Reference 18 are particularly comprehensive in dealing with
the general subject of laboratory safety.
5.1.2 Concentrated nitric and hydrochloric acids present various hazards and are moderately
toxic and extremely irritating to skin and mucus membranes. Use these reagents in a
fume hood whenever possible and if eye or skin contact occurs, flush with large volumes
of water. Always wear protective clothing and safety glasses or a shield for eye
protection, and observe proper mixing when working with these reagents.
5.2 The acidification of samples containing reactive materials may result in the release of toxic gases,
such as cyanides or sulfides. Acidification of samples should be done in a fume hood.
5.3 All personnel handling environmental samples known to contain or to have been in contact with
human waste should be immunized against known disease-causative agents.
April 1995
-------
Method 1637
5.4 During atomization, the graphite tube emits intense UV radiation. Suitable precautions should be
taken to protect personnel from such a hazard.
5.5 The use of the argon/hydrogen gas mixture during the dry and char steps may evolve a
considerable amount of HC1 gas. Therefore, adequate ventilation is required.
6.0 Apparatus, Equipment, and Supplies
Disclaimer: The mention of trade names or commercial products in this method is for illustrative
purposes only and does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the
Environmental Protection Agency. Equivalent performance may be achievable using apparatus
and materials other than those suggested here. The laboratory is responsible for demonstrating
equivalent performance.
6.1 Facility
6.1.1 Clean room—Class 100, 200-ft2 minimum, with down-flow, positive-pressure ventilation,
air-lock entrances, and pass-through doors.
6.1.1.1 Construction materials—Nonmetallic, preferably plastic sheeting attached without
metal fasteners. If painted, paints that do not contain the metal(s) of interest must
be used.
6.1.1.2 Adhesive mats, for use at entry points to control dust and dirt from shoes.
6.1.2 Fume hoods, nonmetallic, two minimum, with one installed internal to the clean room.
6.1.3 Clean benches, class 100, one installed in the clean room, the other adjacent to the
analytical instrument(s) for preparation of samples and standards.
6.2 Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorbance Spectrophotometer
6.2.1 The GFAA spectrometer must be capable of programmed heating of the graphite tube and
the associated delayed atomization device. The instrument must be equipped with an
adequate background correction device capable of removing undesirable nonspecific
absorbance over the spectral region of interest and provide an analytical condition not
subject to the occurrence of interelement spectral overlap interferences. The furnace
device must be capable of using an alternate gas supply during specified cycles of the
analysis. The capability to record relatively fast (< 1 s) transient signals and evaluate data
on a peak area basis is preferred. In addition, a recirculating refrigeration bath is
recommended for improved reproducibility of furnace temperatures.
6.2.2 Single element hollow cathode lamps or single element electrodeless discharge lamps
along with the associated power supplies
6.2.3 Argon gas supply (high-purity grade, 99.99%) for use during the atomization of selenium,
for sheathing the furnace tube when in operation, and during furnace cleanout
April 1995
-------
Method 1637
6.2.4 Alternate gas mixture (hydrogen 5%-argon 95%) for use as a continuous gas flow
environment during the dry and char furnace cycles
6.2.5 Autosampler capable of adding matrix modifier solutions to the furnace, a single addition
of analyte, and completing methods of standard additions when required
6.3 Preconcentration system—System containing no metal parts in the analyte flow path, configured
as shown with a sample loop in Figure 1 and without a sample loop in Figure 2.
NOTE: An alternate preconcentration system to the one described below may be used if
all performance criteria listed in this method can be met. If low recoveries are
encountered in the preconcentration cycle for a particular analyte, it may be necessary
to use an alternate preconcentration system.
6.3.1 Column—Macroporous iminodiacetate chelating resin (Dionex Metpac CC-1 or
equivalent)
6.3.2 Control valves—Inert double stack, pneumatically operated four-way slider valves with
connectors
6.3.3 Argon gas supply regulated at 80-100 psi
6.3.4 Solution reservoirs—Inert containers, e.g., high-density polyethylene (HDPE), for holding
eluent and carrier reagents
6.3.5 Tubing—High-pressure, narrow-bore, inert tubing (e.g., Tefzel ETFE or equivalent) for
interconnection of pumps and valve assemblies and a minimum length for connection of
the preconcentration system with the sample collection vessel
6.3.6 Eluent pumping system (gradient pump)—Programmable flow, high-pressure pumping
system, capable of delivering either one of three eluents at a pressure up to 2000 psi and
a flow rate of 1-5 mL/min
6.3.7 System setup, including sample loop (Figure 1)
6.3.7.1 Sample loop—10-mL loop constructed from narrow-bore, high-pressure inert
tubing, Tefzel ETFE (ethylene tetra-fluoroethylene) or equivalent)
6.3.7.2 Auxiliary pumps
6.3.7.2.1 On-line buffer pump—Piston pump (Dionex QIC pump or
equivalent) for delivering 2 M ammonium acetate buffer solution
6.3.7.2.2 Carrier pump—Peristaltic pump (Gilson Minipuls or equivalent)
for delivering 1% nitric acid carrier solution
6.3.7.2.3 Sample pump—Peristaltic pump for loading sample loop
10 April 1995
-------
Method 1637
6.3.8 System setup without sample loop (Figure 2)
6.3.8.1 Auxiliary Pumps
6.3.8.1.1 Sample pump (Dionex QIC pump or equivalent) for loading
sample on the column
6.3.8.1.2 Carrier pump (Dionex QIC pump or equivalent) used to flush
collection line between samples
6.4 Analytical balance—with capability to measure to 0.1 mg, for use in weighing solids and for
preparing standards
6.5 Temperature adjustable hot plate—capable of maintaining a temperature of 95°C
6.6 Centrifuge—with guard bowl, electric timer, and brake (optional)
6.7 Gravity convection drying oven—with thermostatic control capable of maintaining 105°C (± 5°C)
6.8 Alkaline detergent—Liquinox®, Alconox®, or equivalent
6.9 pH meter or pH paper
6.10 Labware—For determination of trace levels of elements, contamination and loss are of prime
consideration. Potential contamination sources include improperly cleaned laboratory apparatus
and general contamination within the laboratory environment from dust, etc. A clean laboratory
work area should be designated for trace element sample handling. Sample containers can
introduce positive and negative errors in the determination of trace elements by (1) contributing
contaminants through surface desorption or leaching, and (2) depleting element concentrations
through adsorption processes. All labware must be metal free. Suitable construction materials
are fluoropolymer (FEP, PTFE), conventional or linear polyethylene, polycarbonate, and
polypropylene. Fluoropolymer should be used when samples are to be analyzed for mercury. All
labware should be cleaned according to the procedure in Section 11.4. Gloves, plastic wrap,
storage bags, and filters may all be used new without additional cleaning unless results of the
equipment blank pinpoint any of these materials as a source of contamination. In this case, either
an alternate supplier must be obtained or the materials must be cleaned.
NOTE: Chromic acid must not be used for cleaning glassware.
6.10.1 Volumetric flasks, graduated cylinders, funnels and centrifuge tubes
6.10.2 Assorted calibrated pipets
6.10.3 PTFE (or other suitable material) beakers—250-mL with PTFE covers
6.10.4 Narrow-mouth storage bottles—FEP (fluorinated ethylene propylene) with ETFE (ethylene
tetrafluorethylene) screw closure, 125-250 mL capacities
April 1995 11
-------
Method 1637
6.10.5 One-piece stem FEP wash bottle—with screw closure, 125-mL capacity
6.10.6 Tongs—For removal of Apparatus from acid baths. Coated metal tongs may not be used.
6.10.7 Gloves—Clean, nontalc polyethylene, latex, or vinyl; various lengths. Heavy gloves
should be worn when working in acid baths since baths will contain hot, strong acids.
6.10.8 Buckets or basins—5- to 50-L capacity for acid soaking of the Apparatus
6.10.9 Nonmetallic brushes—for scrubbing Apparatus
6.10.10 Storage bags—Clean, zip-type, nonvented, colorless polyethylene (various sizes)
for storage of Apparatus
6.10.11 Plastic wrap—Clean, colorless polyethylene for storage of Apparatus
6.11 Sampling Equipment—The sampling team may contract with the laboratory or a cleaning facility
who is responsible for cleaning, storing, and shipping all sampling devices, sample bottles,
filtration equipment, and all other Apparatus used for the collection of ambient water samples.
Before the equipment is shipped to the field site, the laboratory or facility must generate an
acceptable equipment blank (Section 9.5.3) to demonstrate that the sampling equipment is free
from contamination.
6.11.1 Sampling Devices—Before ambient water samples are collected, consideration should be
given to the type of sample to be collected and the devices to be used (grab, surface, or
subsurface samplers). The laboratory or cleaning facility must clean all devices used for
sample collection. The Sampling Method describes various types of samplers. Cleaned
sampling devices should be stored in polyethylene bags or wrap.
6.11.2 Sample bottles—Fluoropolymer (FEP, PTFE), conventional or linear polyethylene,
polycarbonate, or polypropylene; 500 mL with lids. Cleaned sample bottles should be
filled with 0.1% HC1 (v/v) until use.
NOTE: If mercury is a target analyte, fluoropolymer or glass bottles must be used.
6.11.3 Filtration Apparatus
6.11.3.1 Filters, Gelman Supor 0.45-um, 15-mm diameter filter capsules (Gelman
12175), or equivalent
6.11.3.2 Peristaltic pump—115-V a.c., 12-V d.c., internal battery, variable-speed,
single-head (Cole-Parmer, portable, "Masterflex L/S," Catalog No. H-
07570-10 drive with Quick Load pump head, Catalog No. H-07021-24,
or equivalent)
6.11.3.3 Tubing for use with peristaltic pump—Styrene/ethylene/butylene/silicone
(SEES) resin, approximately 3/8-in i.d. by approx 3 ft (Cole-Parmer size
18, Catalog No. G-06464-18, or approximately 1/4-in i.d., Cole-Parmer
12 April 1995
-------
Method 1637
size 17, Catalog No. G-06464-17, or equivalent). Tubing is cleaned by
soaking in 5-10% HC1 solution for 8-24 h, rinsing with reagent water in
a clean bench in a clean room, and drying in the clean bench by purging
with metal-free air or nitrogen. After drying, the tubing is double-bagged
in clear polyethylene bags, serialized with a unique number, and stored
until use.
7.0 Reagents and Standards
Reagents may contain elemental impurities that might affect analytical data. Only high-purity
reagents should be used. If the purity of a reagent is in question, analyze for contamination. All
acids used for this method must be of ultra high-purity grade or equivalent. Suitable acids are
available from a number of manufacturers. Redistilled acids prepared by sub-boiling distillation
are acceptable.
7.1 Reagents for cleaning Apparatus, sample bottle storage, and sample preservation and preparation.
7.1.1 Nitric acid, concentrated (sp gr 1.41), Seastar or equivalent
7.1.2 Nitric acid (1+1)—Add 500 mL concentrated nitric acid to 400 mL of regent water and
dilute to 1 L.
7.1.3 Nitric acid 0.75 M—Dilute 47.7 mL (67.3 g) concentrated nitric acid to 1000 mL with
reagent water.
7.1.4 Nitric acid (1+9)—Add 100 mL concentrated nitric acid to 400 mL of reagent water and
dilute to 1 L.
7.1.5 Hydrochloric acid, concentrated (sp gr 1.19)
7.1.6 Hydrochloric acid (1+1)—Add 500 mL concentrated hydrochloric acid to 400 mL of
reagent water and dilute to 1 L.
7.1.7 Hydrochloric acid (1+4)—Add 200 mL concentrated hydrochloric acid to 400 mL of
reagent water and dilute to 1 L.
7.1.8 Hydrochloric acid (HC1)—IN trace metal grade
7.1.9 Hydrochloric acid (HC1)—10% wt, trace metal grade
7.1.10 Hydrochloric acid (HC1)—1% wt, trace metal grade
7.1.11 Hydrochloric acid (HC1)—0.5% (v/v), trace metal grade
7.1.12 Hydrochloric acid (HC1)—0.1% (v/v) ultrapure grade
7.1.13 Acetic acid, glacial (sp gr 1.05)
April 1995 13
-------
Method 1637
7.1.14 Ammonium hydroxide (20%)
7.1.15 Ammonium acetate buffer 1 M, pH 5.5—Add 58 mL (60.5 g) of glacial acetic acid to 600
mL of reagent water. Add 65 mL (60 g) of 20% ammonium hydroxide and mix. Check
the pH of the resulting solution by withdrawing a small aliquot and testing with a
calibrated pH meter, adjusting the solution to pH 5.5 (± 0.1) with small volumes of acetic
acid or ammonium hydroxide as necessary. Cool and dilute to 1 L with reagent water.
7.1.16 Ammonium acetate buffer 2 M, pH 5.5—Prepare as for Section 7.1.15 using 116 mL (121
g) glacial acetic acid and 130 mL (120 g) 20% ammonium hydroxide, diluted to 1000 mL
with reagent water.
NOTE: If the system is configured as shown in Figure 1, the ammonium acetate buffer
solutions may be further purified by passing them through the chelating column at a flow
rate of 5.0 mL/min. Collect the purified solution in a container. Then elute the collected
contaminants from the column using 0.75 M nitric acid for 5 min at a flow rate of 4.0
mL/min. If the system is configured as shown in Figure 2, most of the buffer is being
purified in an on-line configuration through the cleanup column.
7.1.17 Oxalic acid dihydrate (CASRN 6153-56-6), 0.2 M—Dissolve 25.2 g reagent grade
C2H2O4-2H2O in 250 mL reagent water and dilute to 1000 mL with reagent water.
CAUTION: Oxalic acid is toxic; handle with care.
7.2 Reagent water—Water demonstrated to be free from the metal(s) of interest and potentially
interfering substances at the MDL for that metal listed in Table 1. Prepared by distillation,
deionization, reverse osmosis, anodic/cathodic stripping voltammetry, or other technique that
removes the metal(s) and potential interferent(s).
7.3 Matrix Modifier—Dissolve 300 mg palladium (Pd) powder in a minimum amount of concentrated
HNO3 (1 mL of HNO3, adding concentrated HC1 only if necessary). Dissolve 200 mg of
Mg(NO3)2-6H2O in reagent water. Pour the two solutions together and dilute to 100 mL with
reagent water.
NOTE: It is recommended that the matrix modifier be analyzed separately to assess the
contribution of the modifier to the overall laboratory blank.
7.4 Standard stock solutions—Stock standards may be purchased or prepared from ultra high-purity
grade chemicals (99.99 to 99.999% pure). All compounds must be dried for 1 h at 105°C, unless
otherwise specified. It is recommended that stock solutions be stored in FEP bottles. Replace
stock standards when succeeding dilutions for preparation of calibration standards cannot be
verified.
14 April 1995
-------
Method 1637
CAUTION: Many of these chemicals are extremely toxic if inhaled or swallowed
(Section 5.1). Wash hands thoroughly after handling.
Below are typical stock solution preparation procedures for 1-L quantities, but for the purpose of
pollution prevention, the analyst is encouraged to prepare smaller quantities when possible.
Concentrations are calculated based on the weight of the pure element or the weight of the
compound multiplied by the fraction of the analyte in the compound.
From pure element,
Concentration - we*ht
volume (L)
From pure compound,
Concentration = **** <**> *
volume (L)
Where:
gravimetric factor = the weight fraction of the analyte in the compound.
7.4.1 Cadmium solution, stock—1 mL - 1000 ug Cd: Dissolve 1.000 g Cd metal, acid-cleaned
with (1+9) HNO3, weighed accurately to at least four significant figures, in 50 mL (1+1)
HNO3 with heating to effect dissolution. Let solution cool and dilute with reagent water
in a 1-L volumetric flask.
7.4.2 Lead solution, stock—1 mL = 1000 ug Pb: Dissolve 0.1599 g PbNO3 in 5 mL (1+1)
nitric acid. Dilute to 100 mL with reagent water.
7.5 Preparation of calibration standards—Fresh calibration standards should be prepared every 2
weeks, or as needed. Dilute each stock standard solution to levels appropriate to the operating
range of the instrument using reagent water containing 1% (v/v) HNO3. Calibration standards
should be prepared at a minimum of three concentrations, one of which must be at the ML (Table
1), and another that must be near the upper end of the linear dynamic range. Calibration standards
should be initially verified using a quality control sample (Section 7.7).
7.6 Blanks—The laboratory should prepare the following types of blanks. A calibration blank is used
to establish the analytical calibration curve; the laboratory (method) blank is used to assess
possible contamination from the sample preparation procedure and to assess spectral background,
and the rinse blank is used to flush the instrument autosampler uptake system. All diluent acids
should be made from concentrated acids (Section 7.1) and reagent water (Section 7.2). In addition
to these blanks, the laboratory may be required to analyze field blanks (Section 9.5.2) and
equipment blanks (Section 9.5.3).
April 1995 15
-------
Method 1637
7.6.1 Calibration blank—The calibration blank consists of 1% (v/v) HNO3 in reagent water.
The calibration blank should be stored in a FEP bottle.
7.6.2 Laboratory blank—Must contain all the reagents in the same volumes as those used in
processing the samples. The laboratory blank must be carried through the same entire
preparation scheme as the samples including digestion, when applicable (Section 9.5.1).
7.6.3 The rinse blank is prepared as needed by adding 1.0 mL of concentrated HNO3 and 1.0
mL concentrated HC1 to 1 L of reagent water.
7.7 Quality control sample (QCS)—The QCS must be obtained from an outside source different from
the standard stock solutions and prepared in the same acid mixture as that for the calibration
standards. The concentration of the analytes in the QCS solution should be such that the resulting
solution will provide an absorbance reading of approximately 0.1. The QCS solution should be
stored in a FEP bottle and analyzed as needed to meet data quality needs. A fresh solution should
be prepared quarterly or more frequently as needed.
7.8 Ongoing precision and recovery (OPR) sample—The OPR should be prepared in the same acid
mixture as that for the calibration standards by combining method analytes at appropriate
concentrations. The OPR must be carried through the same entire preparation scheme as that for
the samples including sample digestion, when applicable (Section 9.6).
8.0 Sample Collection, Filtration, Preservation, and Storage
8.1 Before an aqueous sample is collected, consideration should be given to the type of data required,
(i.e., dissolved or total recoverable), so that appropriate preservation and pretreatment steps can
be taken. The pH of all aqueous samples must be tested immediately before aliquotting for
processing or direct analysis to ensure the sample has been properly preserved. If properly acid-
preserved, the sample can be held up to 6 months before analysis.
8.2 Sample collection—Samples are collected as described in the Sampling Method.
8.3 Sample filtration—For dissolved metals, samples and field blanks are filtered through a 0.45 urn
capsule filter at the field site. The Sampling Method describes the filtering procedures. For the
determination of total recoverable elements, samples are not filtered but should be preserved
according to the procedures in Section 8.4.
8.4 Sample preservation—Preservation of samples and field blanks for both dissolved and total
recoverable elements may be performed in the field when the samples are collected or in the
laboratory. However, to avoid the hazards of strong acids in the field and transport restrictions,
to minimize the potential for sample contamination, and to expedite field operations, the sampling
team may prefer to ship the samples to the laboratory within 2 weeks of collection. Samples and
field blanks should be preserved at the laboratory immediately when they are received. For all
metals, preservation involves the addition of 10% HNO3 (Section 7.1.4) to bring the sample to pH
< 2. For samples received at neutral pH, approx 5 mL of 10% HNO3 per liter will be required.
16 April 1995
-------
Method 1637
8.4.1 Wearing clean gloves, remove the cap from the sample bottle, add the volume of reagent
grade acid that will bring the pH to < 2, and recap the bottle immediately. If the bottle
is full, withdraw the necessary volume using a precleaned pipet and then add the acid.
Record the volume withdrawn and the amount of acid used.
NOTE: Do not dip pH paper or a pH meter into the sample; remove a small aliquot with
a clean pipet and test the aliquot. When the nature of the sample is either unknown or
known to be hazardous, acidification should be done in a fume hood (Section 5.2).
8.4.2 Store the preserved sample for a minimum of 48 h at 0-4°C to allow the acid to
completely dissolve the metal(s) adsorbed on the container walls. The sample should then
verified to be pH < 2 just before withdrawing an aliquot for processing or direct analysis.
If for some reason such as high alkalinity the sample pH is verified to be > 2, more acid
must be added and the sample held for 16 h until verified to be pH < 2 (Section 8.1).
8.4.3 With each sample set, preserve a method blank and an OPR sample in the same way as
the sample(s).
8.4.4 Sample bottles should be stored in polyethylene bags at 0-4°C until analysis.
9.0 Quality Assurance/Quality Control
9.1 Each laboratory that uses this method is required to operate a formal quality assurance program
(Reference 19). The minimum requirements of this program consist of an initial demonstration
of laboratory capability, analysis of samples spiked with metals of interest to evaluate and
document data quality, and analysis of standards and blanks as tests of continued performance.
To determine that results of the analysis meet the performance characteristics of the method,
laboratory performance is compared to established performance criteria.
9.1.1 The analyst shall make an initial demonstration of the ability to generate acceptable
accuracy and precision with this method. This ability is established as described in
Section 9.2.
9.1.2 In recognition of advances that are occurring in analytical technology, the analyst is
permitted to exercise certain options to eliminate interferences or lower the costs of
measurements. These options include alternate digestion, concentration, and cleanup
procedures, and changes in instrumentation. Alternate determinative techniques, such as
the substitution of a colorimetric technique or changes that degrade method performance,
are not allowed. If an analytical technique other than the techniques specified in the
method is used, that technique must have a specificity equal to or better than the
specificity of the techniques in the method for the analytes of interest.
9.1.2.1 Each time the method is modified, the analyst is required to repeat the procedure
in Section 9.2. If the change will affect the detection limit of the method, the
laboratory is required to demonstrate that the MDL (40 CFR Part 136, Appendix
B) is lower than the MDL for that analyte in this method, or one-third the
April 1995 17
-------
Method 1637
regulatory compliance level, whichever is higher. If the change will affect
calibration, the analyst must recalibrate the instrument according to Section 10.
9.1.2.2 The laboratory is required to maintain records of modifications made to this
method. These records include the following, at a minimum:
9.1.2.2.1 The names, titles, addresses, and telephone numbers of the
analyst(s) who performed the analyses and modification, and of
the quality control officer who witnessed and will verify the
analyses and modification
9.1.2.2.2 A listing of metals measured, by name and CAS Registry number
9.1.2.2.3 A narrative stating reason(s) for the modification(s)
9.1.2.2.4 Results from all quality control (QC) tests comparing the
modified method to this method, including the following:
(a) Calibration
(b) Calibration verification
(c) Initial precision and recovery (Section 9.2)
(d) Analysis of blanks
(e) Accuracy assessment
9.1.2.2.5 Data that will allow an independent reviewer to validate each
determination by tracing the instrument output (peak height, area,
or other signal) to the final result. These data are to include the
following, where possible:
(a) Sample numbers and other identifiers
(b) Digestion/preparation or extraction dates
(c) Analysis dates and times
(d) Analysis sequence/run chronology
(e) Sample weight or volume
(f) Volume before each extraction/concentration step
(g) Volume after each extraction/concentration step
(h) Final volume before analysis
(i) Injection volume
(j) Dilution data, differentiating between dilution of a
sample or extract
(k) Instrument and operating conditions (make, model,
revision, modifications)
(1) Sample introduction system (autosampler, flow injection
system, etc.)
(m) Operating conditions (background corrections,
temperature program, flow rates, etc.)
(n) Preconcentration system
(o) Detector (type, operating conditions, etc.)
18 April 1995
-------
Method 1637
(p) Mass spectra, printer tapes, and other recordings of raw
data
(q) Quantitation reports, data system outputs, and other data
to link raw data to results reported
9.1.3 Analyses of blanks are required to demonstrate freedom from contamination. Section 9.5
describes the required types, procedures, and criteria for analyzing blanks.
9.1.4 To monitor method performance, the laboratory shall spike at least 10% of the samples
with the metal(s) of interest. Section 9.3 describes this test. When results of these spikes
indicate atypical method performance for samples, an alternative extraction or cleanup
technique must be used to bring method performance within acceptable limits. If method
performance for spikes cannot be brought within the limits in this method, the result may
not be reported for regulatory compliance purposes.
9.1.5 The laboratory shall, on an ongoing basis, demonstrate through calibration verification and
analysis of the ongoing precision and recovery aliquot that the analytical system is in
control. Sections 10.8 and 9.6 describe these procedures.
9.1.6 The laboratory shall maintain records to define the quality of data that are generated.
Section 9.3.4 describes the development of accuracy statements.
9.2 Initial demonstration of laboratory capability
9.2.1 Method detection limit—To establish the ability to detect the trace metals of interest, the
analyst shall determine the MDL for each analyte according to the procedure in 40 CFR
136, Appendix B using the apparatus, reagents, and standards that will be used in the
practice of this method. The laboratory must produce an MDL that is less than or equal
to the MDL listed in Table 1, or one-third the regulatory compliance limit, whichever is
greater. MDLs should be determined when a new operator begins work or whenever, in
the judgment of the analyst, a change in instrument hardware or operating conditions
would dictate that they be redetermined.
9.2.2 Initial precision and recovery (IPR)—To establish the ability to generate acceptable
precision and recovery, the analyst shall perform the following operations.
9.2.2.1 Analyze four aliquots of reagent water spiked with the metal(s) of interest at 2-3
times the ML (Table 1), according to the procedures in Section 12. All digestion,
extraction, and concentration steps, and the containers, labware, and reagents that
will be used with samples must be used in this test.
9.2.2.2 Using results of the set of four analyses, compute the average percent recovery
(X) for the metal(s) in each aliquot and the standard deviation of the recovery (s)
for each metal.
9.2.2.3 For each metal, compare s and X with the corresponding limits for initial
precision and recovery in Table 2. If s and X for all metal(s) meet the acceptance
criteria, system performance is acceptable and analysis of blanks and samples may
begin. If, however, any individual s exceeds the precision limit or any individual
April 1995 19
-------
Method 1637
X falls outside the range for accuracy, system performance is unacceptable for
that metal. Correct the problem and repeat the test (Section 9.2.2.1).
9.2.3 Linear dynamic range (LDR)—The upper limit of the LDR must be established for the
wavelength used for each analyte by determining the signal responses from a minimum
of six different concentration standards across the range, two of which are close to the
upper limit of the LDR. Determined LDRs must be documented and kept on file. The
analyst should judge the linear calibration range that may be used for the analysis of
samples from the resulting data. The upper LDR limit should be an observed signal no
more than 10% below the level extrapolated from the four lower standards. The LDRs
should be verified whenever, in the judgment of the analyst, a change in analytical
performance caused by either a change in instrument hardware or operating conditions
would dictate they be redetermined.
NOTE: Multiple cleanout furnace cycles may be necessary to fully define or utilize the
LDR for certain elements such as chromium. For this reason, the upper limit of the
linear calibration range may not correspond to the upper LDR limit.
Determined sample analyte concentrations that exceed the upper limit of the linear
calibration range must either be diluted and reanalyzed with concern for memory effects
(Section 4.4.3) or analyzed by another approved method.
9.2.4 Quality control sample (QCS)—When beginning the use of this method, quarterly or as
required to meet data quality needs, verify the calibration standards and acceptable
instrument performance with the preparation and analyses of a QCS (Section 7.7). To
verify the calibration standards the determined mean concentration from 3 analyses of the
QCS must be within ± 10% of the stated QCS value. If the QCS is not within the
required limits, an immediate second analysis of the QCS is recommended to confirm
unacceptable performance. If the calibration standards, acceptable instrument
performance, or both cannot be verified, the source of the problem must be identified and
corrected before proceeding with further analyses.
9.3 Method accuracy—To assess the performance of the method on a given sample matrix, the
laboratory must perform matrix spike (MS) and matrix spike duplicate (MSD) sample analyses
on 10% of the samples from each site being monitored, or at least one MS sample analysis and
one MSD sample analysis must be performed for each sample batch (samples collected from the
same site at the same time, to a maximum of 10 samples), whichever is more frequent. Blanks
(e.g., field blanks) may not be used for MS/MSD analysis.
9.3.1 Determine the concentration of the MS and MSD as follows:
9.3.1.1 If, as in compliance monitoring, the concentration of a specific metal in the
sample is being checked against a regulatory concentration limit, the spike must
be at that limit or at one to five times the background concentration, whichever
is greater.
20 April 1995
-------
Method 1637
9.3.1.2 If the concentration is not being checked against a regulatory limit, the
concentration must be at one to five times the background concentration or at one
to five times the ML in Table 1, whichever is greater.
9.3.2 Assess spike recovery
9.3.2.1 Determine the background concentration (B) of each metal by analyzing one
sample aliquot according to the procedure in Section 12.
9.3.2.2 If necessary, prepare a QC check sample concentrate that will produce the
appropriate level (Section 9.3.1) in the sample when the concentrate is added.
9.3.2.3 Spike a second sample aliquot with the QC check sample concentrate and analyze
it to determine the concentration after spiking (A) of each metal.
9.3.2.4 Calculate each percent recovery (P) as 100(A - B)/T, where T is the known true
value of the spike.
9.3.3 Compare the percent recovery (P) for each metal with the corresponding QC acceptance
criteria found in Table 2. If any individual P falls outside the designated range for
recovery, that metal has failed the acceptance criteria.
9.3.3.1 For a metal that has failed the acceptance criteria, analyze the ongoing precision
and recovery standard (Section 9.6). If the OPR is within its respective limit for
the metal(s) that failed (Table 2), the analytical system is in control and the
problem is attributable to the sample matrix. This situation should be rare
because of the matrix elimination preconcentration step before analysis. If a low
recovery is found, check the pH of the sample plus the buffer mixture. The
resulting pH should be about 5.5. The pH of the sample strongly influences the
column's ability to preconcentrate the metals; therefore, a low pH may cause a
low recovery.
9.3.3.2 For samples that show matrix problems, further isolate the metal(s) from the
sample matrix using dilution, chelation, extraction, concentration, hydride
generation, or other means and repeat the accuracy test (Section 9.3.2).
9.3.3.3 If the recovery for the metal remains outside the acceptance criteria, the analytical
result for that metal in the unspiked sample is suspect and may not be reported
for regulatory compliance purposes.
9.3.4 Assess recovery for samples and maintain records.
9.3.4.1 After the analysis of five samples of a given matrix type (river water, lake water,
etc.) for which the metal(s) pass the tests in Section 9.3.3, compute the average
percent recovery (R) and the standard deviation of the percent recovery (SR) for
the metal(s). Express the accuracy assessment as a percent recovery interval from
R - 2SR to R + 2SR for each matrix. For example, if R = 90% and SR - 10%
for five analyses of river water, the accuracy interval is expressed as 70-110%.
April 1995 21
-------
Method 1637
9.3.4.2 Update the accuracy assessment for each metal in each matrix on a regular basis
(e.g., after each 5-10 new measurements).
9.4 Precision of MS and MSD
9.4.1 Calculate the relative percent difference (RPD) between the MS and MSD according to
the equation below using the concentrations found in the MS and MSD. Do not use the
recoveries calculated in Section 9.3.2.4 for this calculation because the RPD is inflated
when the background concentration is near the spike concentration.
RPD =
(Dl+D2)/2
Where:
Dl = concentration of the analyte in the MS sample
D2 = concentration of the analyte in the MSD sample
9.4.2 The relative percent difference between the MS and the MSD must be less than 20%. If
this criterion is not met, the analytical system is judged to be out of control. Correct the
problem and reanalyze all samples in the sample batch associated with the MS/MSD that
failed the RPD test.
9.5 Blanks—Blanks are analyzed to demonstrate freedom from contamination.
9.5.1 Laboratory (method) blank
9.5.1.1 Prepare a method blank with each sample batch (samples of the same matrix
started through the sample preparation process (Section 12) on the same 12-hour
shift, to a maximum of 10 samples). Analyze the blank immediately after
analysis of the OPR (Section 9.6) to demonstrate freedom from contamination.
9.5.1.2 If the metal of interest or any potentially interfering substance is found in the
blank at a concentration equal to or greater than the MDL (Table 1), sample
analysis must be halted, the source of the contamination determined, the samples
and a new method blank prepared, and the sample batch and fresh method blank
reanalyzed.
9.5.1.3 Alternatively, if a sufficient number of blanks (three minimum) are analyzed to
characterize the nature of a blank, the average concentration plus two standard
deviations must be less than the regulatory compliance level.
9.5.1.4 If the result for a single blank remains above the MDL or if the result for the
average concentration plus two standard deviations of three or more blanks
exceeds the regulatory compliance level, results for samples associated with those
blanks may not be reported for regulatory compliance purposes. Stated another
way, results for all initial precision and recovery tests (Section 9.2) and all
samples must be associated with an uncontaminated method blank before these
results may be reported for regulatory compliance purposes.
22 April 1995
-------
Method 1637
9.5.2 Field blank
9.5.2.1 Analyze the field blank(s) shipped with each set of samples (samples collected
from the same site at the same time, to a maximum of 10 samples). Analyze the
blank immediately before analyzing the samples in the batch.
9.5.2.2 If the metal of interest or any potentially interfering substance is found in the
field blank at a concentration equal to or greater than the ML (Table 1), or greater
than one-fifth the level in the associated sample, whichever is greater, results for
associated samples may be the result of contamination and may not be reported
for regulatory compliance purposes.
9.5.2.3 Alternatively, if a sufficient number of field blanks (three minimum) are analyzed
to characterize the nature of the field blank, the average concentration plus two
standard deviations must be less than the regulatory compliance level or less than
one-half the level in the associated sample, whichever is greater.
9.5.2.4 If contamination of the field blanks and associated samples is known or
suspected, the laboratory should communicate this to the sampling team so that
the source of contamination can be identified and corrective measures taken
before the next sampling event.
9.5.3 Equipment Blanks—Before any sampling equipment is used at a given site, the laboratory
or cleaning facility is required to generate equipment blanks to show that the sampling
equipment is free from contamination. Two types of equipment blanks are required:
bottle blanks and sampler check blanks.
9.5.3.1 Bottle blanks—After undergoing appropriate cleaning procedures (Section 11.4),
bottles should be subjected to conditions of use to verify the effectiveness of the
cleaning procedures. A representative set of sample bottles should be filled with
reagent water acidified to pH < 2 and allowed to stand for a minimum of 24 h.
Ideally, the time that the bottles are allowed to stand should be as close as
possible to the actual time that sample will be in contact with the bottle. After
standing, the water should be analyzed for any signs of contamination. If any
bottle shows signs of contamination, the problem must be identified, the cleaning
procedures corrected or cleaning solutions changed, and all affected bottles
recleaned.
9.5.3.2 Sampler check blanks—Sampler check blanks are generated in the laboratory or
at the equipment cleaning contractor's facility by processing reagent water
through the sampling devices using the same procedures that are used in the field
(see Sampling Method). Therefore, the "clean hands/duty hands" technique used
during field sampling should be followed when preparing sampler check blanks
at the laboratory or cleaning facility.
9.5.3.2.1 Sampler check blanks are generated by filling a large carboy or
other container with reagent water (Section 7.2) and processing
the reagent water through the equipment using the same
procedures that are used in the field (see Sampling Method). For
April 1995 23
-------
Method 1637
example, manual grab sampler check blanks are collected by
directly submerging a sample bottle into the water, filling the
bottle, and capping. Subsurface sampler check blanks are
collected by immersing the sampler into the water and pumping
water into a sample container.
9.5.3.2.2 The sampler check blank must be analyzed using the procedures
in this method. If any metal of interest or any potentially
interfering substance is detected in the blank, the source of
contamination or interference must be identified and the problem
corrected. The equipment must be shown to be free from the
metal(s) of interest before the equipment may be used in the
field.
9.5.3.2.3 Sampler check blanks must be run on all equipment that will be
used in the field. If, for example, samples are to be collected
using both a grab sampling device and a subsurface sampling
device, a sampler check blank must be run on both pieces of
equipment.
9.6 Ongoing precision and recovery
9.6.1 Prepare an ongoing precision and recovery sample (laboratory fortified method blank)
identical to the initial precision and recovery aliquots (Section 9.2) with each sample batch
(samples of the same matrix started through the sample preparation process (Section 12)
on the same 12-hour shift, to a maximum of 10 samples) by spiking an aliquot of reagent
water with the metal(s) of interest.
9.6.2 Analyze the OPR sample before analyzing the method blank and samples from the same
batch.
9.6.3 Compute the percent recovery of each metal in the OPR sample.
9.6.4 For each metal, compare the concentration to the limits for ongoing recovery in Table 2.
If all metals meet the acceptance criteria, system performance is acceptable and analysis
of blanks and samples may proceed. If, however, any individual recovery falls outside the
range given, the analytical processes are not being performed properly for that metal.
Correct the problem, reprepare the sample batch, and repeat the ongoing precision and
recovery test (Section 9.6).
9.6.5 Add results that pass the specifications in Section 9.6.4 to initial and previous ongoing
data for each metal in each matrix. Update QC charts to form a graphic representation
of continued laboratory performance. Develop a statement of laboratory accuracy for each
metal in each matrix type by calculating the average percent recovery (R) and the standard
deviation of percent recovery (SR). Express the accuracy as a recovery interval from R -
2SR to R + 2SR. For example, if R = 95% and SR = 5%, the accuracy is 85-105%.
24 April 1995
-------
Method 1637
9.7 The specifications in this method can be met if the instrument used is calibrated properly and then
maintained in a calibrated state. A given instrument will provide the most reproducible results if
dedicated to the settings and conditions required for the analyses of metals by this method.
9.8 Depending on specific program requirements, the laboratory may be required to analyze field
duplicates collected to determine the precision of the sampling technique. The relative percent
difference (RPD) between field duplicates should be less than 20%. If the RPD of the field
duplicates exceeds 20%, the laboratory should communicate this to the sampling team so that the
source of error can be identified and corrective measures taken before the next sampling event.
10.0 Calibration and Standardization
10.1 Table 3 lists recommended wavelengths and instrument operating conditions. However, because
of differences among makes and models of spectrophotometers and electrothermal furnace devices,
the actual instrument conditions selected may vary from those listed.
10.2 The preconcentration system can be configured using a sample loop to define the sample volume
(Figure 1) or the system can be configured such that a sample pump rate and a pumping time
defines the sample volume (Figure 2). The system illustrated in Figure 1 is recommended for
sample sizes of < 10 mL. A thorough rinsing of the sample loop between samples with HNO3
is required. This rinsing will minimize the cross-contamination that may be caused by the sample
loop. The system in Figure 2 should be used for sample volumes of > 10 mL. The sample pump
used in Figure 2 must be calibrated to ensure that a reproducible/defined volume is being
delivered.
10.3 Before this method is used, the instrument operating conditions must be optimized. The analyst
should follow the instructions provided by the manufacturer while using the conditions in Table
3 as a guide. Of particular importance is the determination of the charring temperature limit for
each analyte. This limit is the furnace temperature setting at which a loss in analyte will occur
before atomization. This limit should be determined by conducting char temperature profiles for
each analyte and when necessary, in the matrix of question. The charring temperature selected
should minimize background absorbance while providing some furnace temperature variation
without loss of analyte. For routine analytical operation, the charring temperature is usually set
at least 100°C below this limit. The optimum conditions selected should provide the lowest
reliable MDLs and be similar to those in Table 1. Once the optimum operating conditions are
determined, they should be recorded and available for daily reference.
10.4 Before an initial calibration, the linear dynamic range of the analyte must be determined (Section
9.2.3) using the optimized instrument operating conditions. For all determinations allow an
instrument and hollow cathode lamp warm-up period of not less than 15 min. If an EDL is to be
used, allow 30 min for warm-up.
10.5 Before daily instrument calibration, inspect the graphite furnace, the sample uptake system and
autosampler injector for any change that would affect instrument performance. Clean the system
and replace the graphite tube, platform, or both when needed or daily. A cotton swab dipped in
a 50/50 mixture of isopropyl alcohol (IPA) and H2O (so that it is damp but not dripping) can be
used to remove most of the salt buildup. A second cotton swab is dipped in IPA and the contact
rings are wiped down to ensure they are clean. The rings are then allowed to thoroughly dry and
April 1995 25
-------
Method 1637
then a new tube is placed in the furnace and conditioned according to the instrument
manufacturer's specifications.
10.6 After the warm-up period but before calibration, instrument stability must be demonstrated by
analyzing a standard solution with a concentration three times the ML at least five times. The
resulting relative standard deviation (RSD) of absorbance signals must be < 5%. If the RSD is
> 5%, determine and correct the cause before calibrating the instrument.
10.7 For initial and daily operation, calibrate the instrument according to the instrument manufacturer's
recommended procedures using the calibration blank (Section 7.6.1) and calibration standards
(Section 7.5) prepared at three or more concentrations, one of which must be at the ML (Table
1), and another that must be near the upper end of the linear dynamic range.
10.7. 1 Calculate the response factor (RF) for each metal in each CAL solution using the equation
below and the height or area produced by the metal.
(Cx)
where:
Rx = height or area of the signal for the metal
C = concentration of compound injected (ug/L)
10.7.2 For each metal, calculate the mean RF (M), the standard deviation of the RF (SD), and
the relative standard deviation (RSD) of the mean, where RSD = 100 x SD/M.
10.7.3 Linearity—If the RSD of the mean RF for any metal is less than 25% over the calibration
range, an averaged response factor may be used for that analyte. Otherwise, a calibration
curve for that metal must be used over the calibration range.
10.8 Calibration verification—Immediately following calibration, an initial calibration verification
should be performed. Adjustment of the instrument is performed until verification criteria are met.
Only after these criteria are met may blanks and samples be analyzed.
10.8.1 Analyze the mid-point calibration standard (Section 10.7).
10.8.2 Compute the percent recovery of each metal using the calibration curve obtained in the
initial calibration.
10.8.3 For each metal, compare the recovery with the corresponding limit for calibration
verification in Table 2. If all metals meet the acceptance criteria, system performance is
acceptable and analysis of blanks and samples may continue using the response from the
initial calibration. If any individual value falls outside the range given, system
performance is unacceptable for that compound. Locate and correct the problem and/or
prepare a new calibration check standard and repeat the test (Sections 10.8.1-10.8.3), or
recalibrate the system according to Section 10.7.
26 April 1995
-------
Method 1637
10.8.4 Calibration must be verified following every ten samples by analyzing the mid-point
calibration standard. If the recovery does not meet the acceptance criteria specified in
Table 2, analysis must be halted, the problem corrected, and the instrument recalibrated.
All samples after the last acceptable calibration verification must be reanalyzed.
10.9 A calibration blank must be analyzed following every calibration verification to show that there
is no carryover of the analytes of interest and that the analytical system is free from
contamination. If the concentration of an analyte in the blank result exceeds the MDL, correct
the problem, verify the calibration (Section 10.8), and repeat the analysis of the calibration blank.
11.0 Procedures for Cleaning the Apparatus
11.1 All sampling equipment, sample containers, and labware should be cleaned in a designated
cleaning area that has been demonstrated to be free of trace element contaminants. Such areas
may include class 100 clean rooms as described by Moody (Reference 20), labware cleaning areas
as described by Patterson and Settle (Reference 6), or clean benches.
11.2 Materials, such as gloves (Section 6.10.7), storage bags (Section 6.10.10), and plastic wrap
(Section 6.10.11), may be used new without additional cleaning unless the results of the
equipment blank pinpoint any of these materials as a source of contamination. In this case, either
an alternate supplier must be obtained or the materials must be cleaned.
11.3 Cleaning procedures—Proper cleaning of the Apparatus is extremely important, because the
Apparatus may not only contaminate the samples but may also remove the analytes of interest by
adsorption onto the container surface.
NOTE: If laboratory, field, and equipment blanks (Section 9.5) from an Apparatus
cleaned with fewer cleaning steps than those detailed below show no levels of analytes
above the MDL, those cleaning steps that do not eliminate these artifacts may be omitted
if all performance criteria outlined in Section 9 are met.
11.3.1 Bottles, labware, and sampling equipment
11.3.1.1 Fill a precleaned basin (Section 6.10.8) with a sufficient quantity of a
0.5% solution of liquid detergent (Section 6.8), and completely immerse
each piece of ware. Allow to soak in the detergent for at least 30 min.
11.3.1.2 Using a pair of clean gloves (Section 6.10.7) and clean nonmetallic
brushes (Section 6.10.9), thoroughly scrub down all materials with the
detergent.
11.3.1.3 Place the scrubbed materials in a precleaned basin. Change gloves.
11.3.1.4 Thoroughly rinse the inside and outside of each piece with reagent water
until there is no sign of detergent residue (e.g., until all soap bubbles
disappear).
April 1995 27
-------
Method 1637
11.3.1.5 Change gloves, immerse the rinsed equipment in a hot (50-60°C) bath of
concentrated reagent grade HNO3 (Section 7.1.1) and allow to soak for
at least 2 h.
11.3.1.6 After soaking, use clean gloves and tongs to remove the Apparatus and
thoroughly rinse with distilled, deionized water (Section 7.2).
11.3.1.7 Change gloves and immerse the Apparatus in a hot (50-60°C) bath of IN
trace metal grade HC1 (Section 7.1.8), and allow to soak for at least 48
h.
11.3.1.8 Thoroughly rinse all equipment and bottles with reagent water. Proceed
with Section 11.3.2 for labware and sampling equipment. Proceed with
Section 11.3.3 for sample bottles.
11.3.2 Labware and sampling equipment
11.3.2.1 After cleaning, air dry in a class 100 clean air bench.
11.3.2.2 After drying, wrap each piece of ware or equipment in two layers of
polyethylene film.
11.3.3 Fluoropolymer sample bottles—These bottles should be used if mercury is a target
analyte.
11.3.3.1 After cleaning, fill sample bottles with 0.1 % (v/v) ultrapure HC1 (Section
7.1.12) and cap tightly. To ensure a tight seal, it may be necessary to use
a strap wrench.
11.3.3.2 After capping, double bag each bottle in polyethylene zip-type bags.
Store at room temperature until sample collection.
11.3.4 Bottles, labware, and sampling equipment (polyethylene or material other than
fluoropolymer)
11.3.4.1 Apply the steps outlined in Sections 11.3.1.1-11.3.1.8 to all bottles,
labware, and sampling equipment. Proceed with Section 11.3.4.2 for
bottles or Section 11.3.4.3 for labware and sampling equipment.
11.3.4.2 After cleaning, fill each bottle with 0.1% (v/v) ultrapure HC1 (Section
7.1.12). Double-bag each bottle in a polyethylene bag to prevent
contamination of the surfaces with dust and dirt. Store at room
temperature until sample collection.
11.3.4.3 After rinsing labware and sampling equipment, air dry in a class 100
clean air bench. After drying, wrap each piece of ware or equipment in
two layers of polyethylene film.
28 April 1995
-------
Method 1637
NOTE: Polyethylene bottles cannot be used to collect samples that will be analyzed for
mercury at trace (e.g., 0.012 ug/L) levels because of the potential for vapors to diffuse
through the polyethylene.
11.3.4.4 Polyethylene bags—If polyethylene bags need to be cleaned, clean
according to the following procedure:
11.3.4.4.1 Partially fill with cold, (1+1) HNO3 (Section 7.1.2) and rinse with
distilled deionized water (Section 7.2).
11.3.4.4.2 Dry by hanging upside down from a plastic line with a plastic
clip.
11.3.5 Silicone tubing, fluoropolymer tubing, and other sampling apparatus—Clean any silicone,
fluoropolymer, or other tubing used to collect samples by rinsing with 10% HC1 (Section
7.1.9) and flushing with water from the site before sample collection.
11.3.6 Extension pole—Because of its length, it is impractical to submerse the 2-m polyethylene
extension pole (used in with the optional grab sampling device) in acid solutions as just
described. If such an extension pole is used, a nonmetallic brush (Section 6.10.9) should
be used to scrub the pole with reagent water and the pole wiped down with acids
described in Section 11.3.4. After cleaning, the pole should be wrapped in polyethylene
film.
11.4 Storage—Store each piece or assembly of the Apparatus in a clean, single polyethylene zip-type
bag. If shipment is required, place the bagged apparatus in a second polyethylene zip-type bag.
11.5 All cleaning solutions and acid baths should be periodically monitored for accumulation of metals
that could lead to contamination. When levels of metals in the solutions become too high, the
solutions and baths should be changed and the old solutions neutralized and discarded to comply
with state and federal regulations.
12.0 Procedures for Sample Preparation and Analysis
12.1 Aqueous sample preparation—dissolved analytes
12.1.1 For determination of dissolved analytes in ground and surface waters, pipet an aliquot (>
20 mL) of the filtered, acid-preserved sample into a clean 50-mL polypropylene centrifuge
tube. Add an appropriate volume of (1+1) nitric acid to adjust the acid concentration of
the aliquot to approximate a 1% (v/v) nitric acid solution (e.g., add 0.4 mL (1+1) HNO3
to a 20-mL aliquot of sample). Cap the tube and mix. The sample is now ready for
analysis. Allowance for sample dilution should be made in the calculations.
April 1995 29
-------
Method 1637
12.2 Aqueous sample preparation—total recoverable analytes
NOTE: To preclude contamination during sample digestion, it may be necessary to
perform the open beaker, total-recoverable digestion procedure described in Sections
12.2,1-12.2.6 in a fume hood that is located in a clean room. Section 12.2.7 provides an
alternate digestion procedure, but the procedure has not undergone interlaboratory
testing.
12.2.1 To determine total recoverable analytes in ambient water samples, transfer a 100-mL (±
1 mL) aliquot from a well-mixed, acid-preserved sample to a 250-mL Griffin beaker
(Section 6.10.3). If appropriate, a smaller sample volume may be used.
12.2.2 Add 2 mL (1+1) nitric acid to the beaker and place the beaker on the hot plate for
digestion. The hot plate should be located in a fume hood and previously adjusted to
provide evaporation at a temperature of approximately but no higher than 85°C. (See the
following note.) To prevent sample contamination from the fume hood environment, the
beaker should be covered or other necessary steps should be taken.
NOTE: For proper heating, adjust the temperature control of the hot plate so that an
uncovered Griffin beaker containing 50 mL of water placed in the center of the hotplate
can be maintained at a temperature approximately but no higher than 85°C. (Once the
beaker is covered with a watch glass, the temperature of the water will rise to
approximately 95°C.)
12.2.3 Reduce the volume of the sample aliquot to about 20 mL by gentle heating at 85°C. Do
not boil. This step takes about 2 h for a 100-mL aliquot with the rate of evaporation
rapidly increasing as the sample volume approaches 20 mL. (A spare beaker containing
20 mL of water can be used as a gauge.)
12.2.4 Cover the lip of the beaker with a watch glass to reduce additional evaporation and gently
reflux the sample for 30 min. (Slight boiling may occur, but vigorous boiling must be
avoided to prevent loss of the HC1-H2O azeotrope.)
12.2.5 Allow the beaker to cool. Quantitatively transfer the sample solution to a 50-mL
volumetric flask or 50-mL class A stoppered graduated cylinder, make to volume with
reagent water, stopper, and mix.
12.2.6 Allow any undissolved material to settle overnight, or centrifuge a portion of the prepared
sample until clear. (If, after centrifuging or standing overnight, the sample contains
suspended solids that would clog the nebulizer, a portion of the sample may be filtered
to remove the solids before analysis. However, care should be exercised to avoid
potential contamination from filtration.) The sample is now ready to be analyzed.
Because the effects of various matrices on the stability of diluted samples cannot be
characterized, all analyses should be performed as soon as possible after the completed
preparation.
30 April 1995
-------
Method 1637
12.2.7 Alternate total recoverable digestion procedure
12.2.7.1 Open the preserved sample under clean conditions. Add ultrapure nitric
acid at the rate of 10 mL/L. Remove the cap from the original container
only long enough to add the aliquot of acid. The sample container should
not be filled to the lip by the addition of the acid. However, only
minimal headspace is needed to avoid leakage during heating.
12.2.7.2 Tightly recap the container and shake thoroughly. Place the container in
an oven preheated to 85°C. The container should be placed on an
insulating piece of material such as wood rather than directly on the
typical metal grating. After the samples have reached 85°C, heat for 2
h. (Total time will be 2.5-3 h depending on the sample size).
Temperature can be monitored using an identical sample container with
distilled water and a thermocouple to standardize heating time.
12.2.7.3 Allow the sample to cool. The sample is now ready to be analyzed.
Remove aliquots for analysis under clean conditions.
12.3 Before the preconcentration system is used for the first time, it should be thoroughly cleaned and
decontaminated using 0.2 M oxalic acid.
12.3.1 Precleaning the preconcentration system
12.3.1.1 Place approximately 500 mL 0.2 M oxalic acid in each of the
sample/eluent containers. Flush the entire system by running the program
used for sample analysis three times.
12.3.1.2 Rinse the containers with reagent water and repeat the sequence described
in Section 12.2.1.1 using 0.75 M nitric acid and again using reagent water
in place of the 0.2 M oxalic acid.
12.3.1.3 Rinse the containers thoroughly with reagent water, fill them with their
designated reagents, and run through the program used for sample
analysis to prime the pump and all eluent lines with the correct reagents.
12.3.2 Peak profile determination
12.3.2.1 The peak elution time or the collection window should be determined
using an ICP-AES (or Flame AA). Figure 3 is a plot of time vs emission
intensity for Cd and Pb. The collection window is marked in Figure 3
and should provide about 30 seconds buffer on either side of the peak.
If an ICP-AES is not available, it is recommended that the peak profile
be determined by collecting 200-uL samples during the elution part of the
preconcentration cycle and then reconstructing the peak profile from the
analysis of the 200-uL samples.
April 1995 31
-------
Method 1637
12.4 Sample preconcentration
12.4.1 Preconcentration using a sample loop
12.4.1.1 Loading sample loop—With valve 1 in the off position and valve 2 in the
on position, load the sample through the sample loop to waste using the
sample pump for 4 min at 4 mL/min. Switch on the carrier pump and
pump 1% nitric acid to flush the sample collection line.
12.4.1.2 Column loading—With valve 1 in the on position, load the sample from
the loop onto the column using 1 M ammonium acetate for 4.5 min at 4.0
mL/min. Switch on the buffer pump, and pump 2 M ammonium acetate
at a flow rate of 1 mL/min. The analytes are retained on the column, and
most of the matrix is passed through to waste.
12.4.1.3 Elution matrix—With valve 1 in the on position, the gradient pump is
allowed to elute the matrix using the 1 M ammonium acetate. At this
time, the carrier, buffer, and the sample pumps are all off.
12.4.1.4 Elute analytes—Turn off valve 1 and begin eluting the analytes by
pumping 0.75 M nitric acid through the column and turn off valve 2 and
pump the eluted analytes into the collection flask. The analytes should
be eluted into a 2-mL sample volume.
12.4.1.5 Column reconditioning—Turn on valve 2 to direct the column effluent to
waste, and pump 0.75 M nitric acid, 1 M ammonium acetate, 0.75 M
nitric acid and 1 M ammonium acetate alternately through the column at
4.0 mL/min. Each solvent should be pumped through the column for 2
min. During this process, the next sample can be loaded into the sample
loop using the sample pump.
12.4.1.6 Preconcentration of the sample may be achieved by running through an
eluent pump program. The exact timing of this sequence should be
modified according to the internal volume of the connecting tubing and
the specific hardware configuration used.
12.4.2 Preconcentration using an auxiliary pump to determine sample volume
12.4.2.1 Sample loading—With valves 1 and 2 on and the sample pump on, load
the sample on the column buffering the sample using the gradient pump
and the 2 M buffer. The actual sample volume is determined by knowing
the sample pump rate and the time. While the sample is being loaded,
the carrier pump can be used to flush the collection line.
12.4.2.2 Elution matrix—With valve 1 in the off position the gradient pump is
allowed to elute the matrix using the 1 M ammonium acetate. At this
time, the carrier, buffer, and the sample pumps are all off.
32 April 1995
-------
Method 1637
12.4.2.3 Elution of analytes—With valves 1 and 2 in the off position the gradient
pump is switched to 0.75 M HNO3 and the analytes are eluted into the
collection vessel. The analytes should be eluted into a 2-mL sample
volume.
12.4.2.4 Column reconditioning—Turn on valve 2 to direct the column effluent to
waste, and pump 0.75 M nitric acid, 1 M ammonium acetate, 0.75 M
nitric acid and 1 M ammonium acetate alternately through the column at
4.0 mL/min.
NOTE: When switching the gradient pump from nitric acid back to the ammonium
acetate, it is necessary to flush the line connecting the gradient pump to valve 2 with the
ammonium acetate before switching the valve. Otherwise, if the line contains nitric acid,
it will elute the metals from the cleanup column.
12.4.2.5 Preconcentration of the sample may be achieved by running through an
eluent pump program. The exact timing of this sequence should be
modified according to the internal volume of the connecting tubing and
the specific hardware configuration used.
12.5 Sample analysis
12.5.1 Before beginning daily calibration, the instrument should be reconfigured to the optimized
conditions as determined in Section 10. Initiate data system and allow a period of not
less than 15 min for instrument and hollow cathode lamp warm-up. If an EDL is to be
used, allow 30 min for warm-up. Tune and calibrate the instrument for the analytes of
interest.
12.5.2 An autosampler must be used to introduce all solutions into the graphite furnace. Once
the standard, sample or QC solution plus the matrix modifier is injected, the furnace
controller completes furnace cycles and cleanout period as programmed. Analyte signals
must be integrated and collected as peak area measurements. Background absorbances,
background corrected analyte signals, and determined analyte concentrations on all
solutions must be able to be displayed on a CRT for immediate review by the analyst and
be available as hard copy for documentation to be kept on file. Flush the autosampler
solution uptake system with the rinse blank (Section 7.6.3) between each solution injected.
12.5.3 Repeat the sequence described in Section 12.4.1 or 12.4.2 for each sample to be analyzed.
At the end of the analytical run, leave the column filled with 1 M ammonium acetate
buffer until it is next used.
12.5.4 Determined sample analyte concentrations that are > 90% of the upper limit of calibration
must either be diluted with acidified reagent water and reanalyzed with concern for
memory effects (Section 4.4.3), or determined by another approved test procedure.
Samples with a background absorbance > 1.0 must be appropriately diluted with acidified
reagent water and reanalyzed. If the method of standard additions is required, follow the
instructions in Section 12.6.
April 1995 33
-------
Method 1637
12.5.5 During sample analyses, the laboratory must comply with the required quality control
described in Sections 9 and 10.
12.6 Method of standard additions (MSA) — If MSA is required, the following procedure is
recommended.
12.6.1 MSA (Reference 21) involves preparing new standards in the sample matrix by adding
known amounts of standard to one or more aliquots of the processed sample solution.
This technique compensates for a sample constituent that enhances or depresses the
analyte signal, thus producing a different slope from that of the calibration standards. It
will not correct for additive interference, which causes a baseline shift. The simplest
version of this technique is the single-addition method. The procedure is as follows:
Two identical aliquots of the sample solution, each of volume Vx, are taken. To the first
(labeled A) is added a small volume Vs of a standard analyte solution of concentration Cs.
To the second (labeled B) is added the same volume Vs of the solvent. The analytical
signals of A and B are measured and corrected for nonanalyte signals. The unknown
sample concentration Cx is calculated:
where SA and SB are the analytical signals of solutions A and B, respectively. Vs and Cs
should be chosen so that SA is roughly twice SB on the average. To avoid excess dilution
of the sample matrix, it is best if Vs is made much less than Vx, and Cs is thus much
greater than Cx. If a separation or concentration step is used, the additions are best made
first and carried through the entire procedure. For the results from this technique to be
valid, the following limitations must be taken into consideration:
1 . The response vs amount must be linear.
2. The chemical form of the analyte added must respond in the same manner as the
analyte in the sample.
3. The interference effect must be constant over the working range of concern.
4. The signal must be corrected for any additive interference.
13.0 Data Analysis and Calculations
13.1 Sample data should be reported in units of ug/L (parts per billion; ppb). Report results at or
above the ML for metals found in samples and determined in standards. Report all results for
metals found in blanks, regardless of level.
34 April 1995
-------
Method 1637
13.2 Compute the concentration of each analyte in the sample using the averaged RF determined from
the calibration data (Section 10.7) according to the following equation:
C
where the terms are defined in Section 10.6.1.
13.3 For total recoverable aqueous analytes (Sections 12.2.1-12.2.6), if a different aliquot volume other
than 100 mL is used for sample preparation, adjust the dilution factor accordingly. Also, account
for any additional dilution of the prepared sample solution needed to complete the determination
of analytes exceeding the upper limit of the calibration curve. Do not report data below the
determined analyte MDL concentration or below an adjusted detection limit reflecting smaller
sample aliquots used in processing or additional dilutions required to complete the analysis.
13.4 For data values less than the ML, two significant figures should be used for reporting element
concentrations. For data values greater than or equal to the ML, three significant figures should
be used.
13.5 The QC data obtained during the analyses provide an indication of the quality of the sample data
and should be provided with the sample results.
14.0 Method Performance
14.1 The MDLs in Table 1 and the quality control acceptance criteria in Table 2 were validated in two
or three laboratories (Reference 22) for all dissolved analytes.
15.0 Pollution Prevention
15.1 Pollution prevention encompasses any technique that reduces or eliminates the quantity or toxicity
of waste at the point of generation. Many opportunities for pollution prevention exist in
laboratory operation. EPA has established a preferred hierarchy of environmental management
techniques that places pollution prevention as the management option of first choice. Whenever
feasible, laboratory personnel should use pollution prevention techniques to address their waste
generation. When wastes cannot be feasibly reduced at the source, the Agency recommends
recycling as the next best option. The acids used in this method should be reused as practicable
by purifying by electrochemical techniques. The only other chemicals used in this method are the
neat materials used in preparing standards. These standards are used in extremely small amounts
and pose little threat to the environment when managed properly. To minimize the volume of
expired standards to be disposed of, standards should be prepared in volumes consistent with
laboratory use.
April 1995 35
-------
Method 1637
15.2 For information about pollution prevention that may be applied to laboratories and research
institutions, consult Less is Better: Laboratory Chemical Management for Waste Reduction,
available from the American Chemical Society's Department of Government Relations and Science
Policy, 1155 16th Street NW, Washington DC 20036, 202/872-4477.
16.0 Waste Management
16.1 The Environmental Protection Agency requires that laboratory waste management practices be
conducted consistent with all applicable rules and regulations. The Agency urges laboratories to
protect the air, water, and land by minimizing and controlling all releases from hoods and bench
operations, complying with the letter and spirit of any sewer discharge permits and regulations,
and by complying with all solid and hazardous waste regulations, particularly the hazardous waste
identification rules and land disposal restrictions. For further information on waste management
consult The Waste Management Manual for Laboratory Personnel, available from the American
Chemical Society at the address listed in Section 15.2.
17.0 References
1 Adeloju, S.B.; Bond, A.M. "Influence of Laboratory Environment on the Precision and Accuracy
of Trace Element Analysis," Anal. Ghent. 1985, 57, 1728.
2 Berman, S.S.; Yeats, P.A. "Sampling of Seawater for Trace Metals," CRC Reviews in Analytical
Chemistry 1985, 16, 1.
3 Bloom, N.S. "Ultra-Clean Sampling, Storage, and Analytical Strategies for the Accurate
Determination of Trace Metals in Natural Waters"; Presented at the 16th Annual EPA Conference
on the Analysis of Pollutants in the Environment, Norfolk, VA, May 5, 1993.
4 Bruland, K.W. "Trace Elements in Seawater," Chemical Oceanography 1983, 8, 157.
5 Nriagu, J.O.; Larson, G.; Wong, H.K.T.; Azcue, J.M. "A Protocol for Minimizing Contamination
in the Analysis of Trace Metals in Great Lakes Waters," J. Great Lakes Research 1993,19, 175.
6 Patterson, C.C.; Settle, D.M. "Accuracy in Trace Analysis." In National Bureau of Standards
Special Publication 422; LaFleur, P.O., Ed., U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC,
1976.
7 Fitzgerald, W.F.; Watras, C.J. Science of the Total Environment 1989, 87/88, 223.
8 Gill, G.A.; Fitzgerald, W.F. Deep Sea Res. 1985, 32, 287.
9 Prothro, M.G. "Office of Water Policy and Technical Guidance on Interpretation and
Implementation of Aquatic Life Metals Criteria," EPA Memorandum to Regional Water
Management and Environmental Services Division Directors, Oct. 1, 1993.
36 April 1995
-------
Method 1637
10 "Format for Method Documentation," Distributed by the EPA Environmental Monitoring
Management Council, Washington, DC, Nov. 18, 1993.
11 Siraraks, A.; Kingston, H.M.; Riviello, J.M. Anal. Chem. 1990, 62, 1185.
12 Heithmar, E.M.; Hinners, T.A.; Rowan, J.T.; Riviello, J.M. Anal. Chem. 1990, 62, 857.
13 Windom, H.L; Byrd, J.T.; Smith, R.G., Jr.; Huan, F. "Inadequacy of NASQAN Data for Assessing
Metal Trends in the Nation's Rivers," Environ. Sci. Technol. 1991, 25, 1137.
14 Zief, M.; Mitchell, J.W. "Contamination Control in Trace Metals Analysis," Chemical Analysis
1976, 47, Chapter 6.
15 Carcinogens - Working With Carcinogens, Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. Public
Health Service. Centers for Disease Control. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
Publication No. 77-206, Aug. 1977. Available from the National Technical Information Service
(NTIS) as PB-277256.
16 "OSHA Safety and Health Standards, General Industry," 29 CFR 1910, Occupational Safety and
Health Administration, OSHA 2206 (revised January 1976).
17 "Safety in Academic Chemistry Laboratories," American Chemical Society Committee on
Chemical Safety, 3rd ed., 1979.
18 "Proposed OSHA Safety and Health Standards, Laboratories," Occupational Safety and Health
Administration, Fed. Regis., July 24, 1986.
19 Handbook of Analytical Quality Control in Water and Wastewater Laboratories; U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency. Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, Cincinnati, OH,
March 1979; EPA-600/4-79-019.
20 Moody, J.R. "NBS Clean Laboratories for Trace Element Analysis," Anal. Chem. 1982, 54,
1358A.
21 Winefordner, J.D. 'Trace Analysis: Spectroscopic Methods for Elements," Chemical Analysis,
46, pp 41-42.
22 "Results of the Validation Study for Determination of Trace Metals at EPA Water Quality Criteria
Levels," April 1995. Available from the Sample Control Center (operated by DynCorp), 300 N.
Lee Street, Alexandria, VA 22314, 703/519-1140.
18.0 Glossary
Many of the terms and definitions listed below are used in the EPA 1600-series methods, but
terms have been cross-referenced to terms commonly used in other methods where possible.
18.1 Ambient Water—Waters in the natural environment (e.g., rivers, lakes, streams, and other
receiving waters), as opposed to effluent discharges.
April 1995 37
-------
Method 1637
18.2 Analyte—A metal tested for by the methods referenced in this method. The analytes are listed
in Table 1.
18.3 Apparatus—The sample container and other containers, filters, filter holders, labware, tubing,
pipets, and other materials and devices used for sample collection or sample preparation, and that
will contact samples, blanks, or analytical standards.
18.4 Calibration Blank—A volume of reagent water acidified with the same acid matrix as in the
calibration standards. The calibration blank is a zero standard and is used to calibrate the ICP
instrument (Section 7.6.1).
18.5 Calibration Standard (CAL)—A solution prepared from a dilute mixed standard and/or stock
solutions and used to calibrate the response of the instrument with respect to analyte concentration.
18.6 Dissolved Analyte—The concentration of analyte in an aqueous sample that will pass through a
0.45-pm membrane filter assembly before sample acidification (Section 8.3).
18.7 Equipment Blank—An aliquot of reagent water that is subjected in the laboratory to all aspects
of sample collection and analysis, including contact with all sampling devices and apparatus. The
purpose of the equipment blank is to determine whether the sampling devices and apparatus for
sample collection have been adequately cleaned before they were shipped to the field site. An
acceptable equipment blank must be achieved before the sampling devices and apparatus are used
for sample collection. In addition, equipment blanks should be run on random, representative sets
of gloves, storage bags, and plastic wrap for each lot to determine whether these materials are free
from contamination before use.
18.8 Field Blank—An aliquot of reagent water that is placed in a sample container in the laboratory,
shipped to the field, and treated as a sample in all respects, including contact with the sampling
devices and exposure to sampling site conditions, storage, preservation, and all analytical
procedures, which may include filtration. The purpose of the field blank is to determine whether
the field or sample transporting procedures and environments have contaminated the sample.
18.9 Field Duplicates (FD1 and FD2)—Two separate samples collected in separate sample bottles at
the same time and place under identical circumstances and treated exactly the same throughout
field and laboratory procedures. Analyses of FD1 and FD2 give a measure of the precision
associated with sample collection, preservation, and storage, as well as with laboratory procedures.
18.10 Initial Precision and Recovery (BPR)—Four aliquots of the OPR standard analyzed to establish
the ability to generate acceptable precision and accuracy. IPRs are performed before a method
is used for the first time and any time the method or instrumentation is modified.
18.11 Instrument Detection Limit (IDL)—The concentration equivalent to the analyte signal which is
equal to three times the standard deviation of a series of ten replicate measurements of the
calibration blank signal at the selected analytical wavelength.
18.12 Laboratory Blank—An aliquot of reagent water that is treated exactly as a sample including
exposure to all glassware, equipment, solvents, reagents, internal standards, and surrogates that
are used with samples. The laboratory blank is used to determine whether method analytes or
38 April 1995
-------
Method 1637
interferences are present in the laboratory environment, the reagents, or the Apparatus (Sections
7.6.2 and 9.5.1).
18.13 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)—See Ongoing Precision and Recovery (OPR) Standard.
18.14 Laboratory Duplicates (LD1 and LD2)—Two aliquots of the same sample taken in the
laboratory and analyzed separately with identical procedures. Analyses of LD1 and LD2 indicates
precision associated with laboratory procedures, but not with sample collection, preservation, or
storage procedures.
18.15 Laboratory Fortified Blank (LFB)—See Ongoing Precision and Recovery (OPR) Standard.
18.16 Laboratory Fortified Sample Matrix (LFM)—See Matrix Spike (MS) and Matrix Spike
Duplicate (MSD).
18.17 Laboratory Reagent Blank (LRB)—See Laboratory Blank.
18.18 Linear Dynamic Range (LDR)—The concentration range over which the instrument response
to an analyte is linear (Section 9.2.3).
18.19 Matrix Modifier—A substance added to the graphite furnace along with the sample to minimize
the interference effects by selective volatilization of either analyte or matrix components.
18.20 Matrix Spike (MS) and Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD)—Aliquots of an environmental sample
to which known quantities of the method analytes are added in the laboratory. The MS and MSD
are analyzed exactly like a sample. Their purpose is to quantify the bias and precision caused by
the sample matrix. The background concentrations of the analytes in the sample matrix must be
determined in a separate aliquot and the measured values in the MS and MSD corrected for
background concentrations (Section 9.3).
18.21 May—This action, activity, or procedural step is optional.
18.22 May Not—This action, activity, or procedural step is prohibited.
18.23 Method Blank—See Laboratory Blank.
18.24 Method Detection Limit (MDL)—The minimum concentration of an analyte that can be
identified, measured, and reported with 99% confidence that the analyte concentration is greater
than zero (Section 9.2.1 and Table 1).
18.25 Minimum Level (ML)—The lowest level at which the entire analytical system gives a
recognizable signal and acceptable calibration point (Reference 9).
18.26 Must—This action, activity, or procedural step is required.
18.27 Ongoing Precision and Recovery (OPR) Standard—A laboratory blank spiked with known
quantities of the method analytes. The OPR is analyzed exactly like a sample. Its purpose is to
determine whether the methodology is in control and to ensure that the results produced by the
April 1995 39
-------
Method 1637
laboratory remain within the method-specified limits for precision and accuracy (Sections 7.8 and
9.6).
18.28 Preparation Blank—See Laboratory Blank.
18.29 Primary Dilution Standard—A solution containing the analytes that is purchased or prepared
from stock solutions and diluted as needed to prepare calibration solutions and other solutions.
18.30 Quality Control Sample (QCS)—A sample containing all or a subset of the method analytes at
known concentrations. The QCS is obtained from a source external to the laboratory or is
prepared from a source of standards different from the source of calibration standards. It is used
to check laboratory performance with test materials prepared external to the normal preparation
process.
18.31 Reagent Water—Water demonstrated to be free from the method analytes and potentially
interfering substances at the MDL for that metal in the method.
18.32 Should—This action, activity, or procedural step is suggested but not required.
18.33 Standard Addition—The addition of a known amount of analyte to the sample to determine the
relative response of the detector to an analyte within the sample matrix. The relative response is
then used to assess either an operative matrix effect or the sample analyte concentration (Section
12.5).
18.34 Stock Standard Solution—A solution containing one or more method analytes that is prepared
using a reference material traceable to EPA, the National Institute of Science and Technology
(NIST), or a source that will attest to the purity and authenticity of the reference material.
18.35 Total Recoverable Analyte—The concentration of analyte determined by analysis of the solution
extract of an unfiltered aqueous sample following digestion by refluxing with hot dilute mineral
acid(s) as specified in the method (Section 12.2).
40 April 1995
-------
Method 1637
Table 1
List of Analytes Amenable to Analysis Using Method 1637: Lowest Water Quality Criterion
for Each Metal Species, Method Detection Limits, and Minimum Levels
Metal
Cadmium
Lead
Lowest EPA
Water Quality
Criterion fag/L)1
0.32
0.14
Method Detection Limit
(MDL) and Minimum
Level (ML); ugfl.
MDL2
0.0074
0.036
ML3
0.02
0.1
Notes:
1.
2.
3.
Lowest of the freshwater, marine, and human health WQC promulgated by EPA for 14 states at 40 CFR Part 131 (57 FR 60848), with
hardness-dependent freshwater aquatic life criteria adjusted in accordance with 57 FR 60848 to reflect the worst case hardness of 25
mg/L CaCO3 and all aquatic life criteria adjusted in accordance with the Oct. 1, 1993 Office of Water guidance to reflect dissolved
metals criteria.
Method Detection Limit as determined by 40 CFR Part 136, Appendix B.
Minimum Level (ML) calculated by multiplying laboratory-determined MDL by 3.18 and rounding result to nearest multiple of 1, 2,
5, 10, 20, 50, etc. in accordance with procedures used by EAD and described in EPA Draft National Guidance for the Permitting,
Monitoring, and Enforcement of Water Quality-Based Effluent Limitations Set Below Analytical Detection/Quantitation Levels, March
22, 1994.
Table 2
Quality Control Acceptance Criteria for Performance Tests1
Method
1637
Metal
Cadmium
Lead
Initial Precision and
Recovery (Section 9.2)
8 X
23 70-116
27 63-117
Calibration
Verification
(Section 10.8)
81-105
77-103
Ongoing Precision
and
Recovery (Section
9.6)
70-116
60-120
Spike
Recovery
(Section 9.3)
70-116
60-120
All specifications expressed as percent.
April 1995
41
-------
Method 1637
Table 3
Recommended Graphite Furnace Operating Conditions and Recommended Matrix Modifier1"3
Element
Cd
Pb
Wavelength Slit
228.8 0.7
283.3 0.7
Temperature pCf
Char Atom
800 1600
1250 2000
1 Matrix Modifier = 0.015 mg Pd + 0.01 mg Mg(NO3)2.
2 A 5% H2 in Ar gas mix is used during the dry and char steps at 300 mL/min for all elements.
3 A cool-down step between the char and atomization is recommended.
4 Actual char and atomization temperatures may vary from instrument to instrument and are best determined on
an individual basis. The actual drying temperature may vary depending on the temperature of the water used
to cool the furnace.
42 April 1995
-------
Method 1637
Figure "I Sample Loop Conf7 i Qur at i on
Samp 1 e Loop
Load I ng
Co 1 umn
Load i ng
E 1 ut I on of
Matr i x
E 1 ut ion Of
Ana 1 ytes
Co 1 umn
Recond 1 t. I on
Va
1
Off
On
On
Off
Off
I ves
2
On
On
On
Off
On
Buffer
Pump
Off
On
Off
Off
Off
Carr i er
Pump
On
Off
Off
Off
Off
Samp I e
Pump
On
Off
Off
Off
Off
Waste
Off
On
Waste
P I ug
X
I 1
\
/
Mi;
-------
Method 1637
Figure 2 System Diagram Without. Sample Loop
Event
Samp 1 e
Load I ng
E 1 ut 1 on of
Matr 1 x
El union Of
Ana 1 y tes
Co 1 umn
Recond 1 "t I on
Va 1 ves
1 2
On On
Off On
Off Off
Off On
Car r r er
Pump
On
Off
Off
Off
Samp I e
Pump
On
Off
Off
On
Off
On
Waste
44
April 1995
-------
-------
Method 1637
Figure 3 Peak Collection Window from ICP-AES
3.5
2
2'
,_ cn
"> 1
C $
0) i
1.5
0.5
Start of Col lection
'+ Cu
o
End of Col lection
l I
40 80
Time
120
160
April 1995
45
------- |