vvEPA
               United States
               Environmental Protection
               Agency
               Office of Health and
               Environmental Assessment
               Washington DC 20460
 EPA/600/8-85/004A
 February 1985
 Review Draft
               Research and Development
Mutagenicity  and
Carcinogenicity
Assessment of
1,3-Butadiene
Review
Draft
(Do Not
Cite or Quote)
                             Notice

               This document is a preliminary draft. It has not been formally
               released by EPA and should not at this stage be construed to
               represent Agency policy. It is being circulated for comment on its
               technical accuracy and policy implications.

-------
DRAFT                                                     EPA/600/8-85/004A
DO NOT QUOTE OR  CITE                                      February  1985
                                                          Review Draft
                  MUTAGENICITY  AND CARCINOGENICITY ASSESSMENT

                                        OF

                                  1,3-BUTADIENE
                                      NOTICE

THIS DOCUMENT  IS A PRELIMINARY  DRAFT.   It  has  not been formally released by
the U.S. Environmental Protection  Agency and should not at this stage be
construed to represent Agency policy.   It  is being circulated for comments
on its technical accuracy and policy  implications.
                                              .'.:',  Environmental Protection
                                               • • 'oci 5, Library (5PL-16)
                                              '-,j S. Dearborn Street, Room 167Q
                                              Cljioago,. I&   60604
                 Office of Health  and  Environmental  Assessment
                       Office of Research  and  Development
                      U.S. Environmental Protection  Agency
                                Washington,  D.C.

-------
                                   DISCLAIMER







     This document is an external draft for review purposes only and does



not constitute Agency policy.  Mention of trade names or commercial products



does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.

-------
                          DRAFT —DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE


                            CONTENTS  (1,3-Butadiene)


Preface. 	     v
Authors3 Contributors, and Reviewers  	     vi

     1.  SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS .	     1

           1.1.  Summary	     1
           1.2.  Conclusions  ........  	     5

     2.  INTRODUCTION	'.....    	    7

     3.  MUTAGENICITY OF  1,3-BUTADIENE AND  ITS REACTIVE METABOLITES  ....    9

           3.1.  Mutagenicity of 1,3-Butadiene	    9
           3.2.  Metabolism of 1,3-Butauiene and Reaction of Metabolites
                 with .DM,,, .,.....--.,..'-..^..1  .... ^s--J<	10
           3.3.  M'ltagenicity of 3,4-Epoxybutene	13
           3.4.  Genotoxicity of 1 ,2:3,4-Diepoxybutane	14

                 3.4.1.   Studies in Bacteria	14
                 3.4.2.   Studies in Fungi 	   15
                 3.4.3.   Studies in Mammalian Cells  	     17
                 3.4.4.   JJT_ vi_vo Studies	19

           3.5.  Summary  of Mutaoenicity Studies	26

     4. ^ CARCINOGENICITY	27

           4.1.  Toxicology and Pnarmacokinetics	27
           4.2.  Animal  Studies	29

                 4.2.1.   Chronic Toxicity Studies in Mice 	   29
                 4.2.2.   Chronic Toxicity Studies in Rats 	   35
                 4.2.3.   Summary of Chronic Toxicity Studies.  .......   39

           4.3.  Epidemiologic Studies	39

                 4.3.1.   McMicnael  et  al . (1974, 1976)	41
                 4.3.2.  Andjelkovich  et al  . (1976,  1977)	44
                 4.3.3.   Checkoway and Williams (1982)	50
                 4.3.4.   Meinhardt et  al . (1982)	52
                 4.3.5   Matanoski  et  al . (1982)	55
                 4.3.6.   Summary of rpidemiologic Studies 	   59

           4.4.  Quantitative Estimation	62

                 4.4.1.   Procedures for Determination of Unit  Risk	62

                         4.4.1.1.   Description of the Low-Dose Extrapo-
                                   lation Model	64
                         4.4.1.2.   Selection of Data	67


                                      i i i

-------
                          DRAFT—DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE


                             CONTENTS  (continued)


                         4.4.1.3.  Calculation of Human Equivalent
                                   Dosages from Animal Data	68

                         4.4.1.4.  Calculation of the Unit Risk from
                                   Animal Studies 	   70

                                   4.4.1.4.1.  Adjustments for Less
                                               Than Lifetime Duration
                                               of Experiment	70

                         4.4.1.5.  Interpretation of Quantitative
                                   Estimates	71
                         4.4.1.6.  Alternative Models 	   72

                 4.4.2.  Calculation of Quantitative Estimates	73
                 4.4.3.  Comparison of Human and Animal
                         Inhalation Studies 	   76
                 4.4.4.  Relative Potency 	   84
                 4.4.5.  Summary of Quantitative Estimation 	   90

REFERENCES	92
                                       IV

-------
                                    PREFACE
     The Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity Assessment of 1,3-Butadiene was



prepared to serve as a source document for Agency-wide use.  This document was



developed primarily for use by the Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards



to support decision-making regarding possible regulation of 1,3-butadiene as a



hazardous air pollutant.



     In the development of the assessment document, the scientific literature



has been inventoried, key studies have been evaluated, and the summary and



conclusions have been prepared so that the mutagenicity, carci nogenici ty, m
-------
                      AUTHORS, CONTRIBUTORS, AND REVIEWERS



     The Carcinogen Assessment Group and the Reproductive Effects Assessment

 Group within the Office of Health and Environmental Assessment were responsible

 for preparing this document.

 PRINCIPAL AUTHORS

 Steven Bayard, Ph.D.                               Chapters 1 and 4
 Robert P. Beliles, Ph.D.                           Chapters 1, 2, and 4
 Arthur Chiu, Ph.D, M.D.                            Chapters 1, 2, and 4
 Herman J. Gibb, B.S., M.P.H.                       Chapters 1 and 4
 Aparna Koppikar, M.B.B.S.*                         Chapters 1 and 4
 Sneila L. Rosenthal, Ph.D.                         Chapter 3

 •*con$'il tant


 Participating Members - CAG                       Participating Members - REAG

 Roy E. Albert, M.D., Chairman                     Eric Clegg, Ph.D.
 David L. Bayliss, M.S.                            David JacQbson-Kram,  Ph.SJ.
 Chao W. Chen, Ph.D.                               Carole Kimmel, Ph.O.
 Margaret M.L. Chu, Ph.D.                          Gary L. Kimmel, Ph.i).
 Bernard H. Haberman, D.V.M, M.S.                   Carol N. Sakai , Ph.D.
 Charalingayya B. Hiremath, Ph.D.                   Ann Huang Sciambi,  Ph.D.
 James W. Holder, Ph.D.                            Lawrence Valcovic,  Ph.D.
 Robert E. McGaughy, Ph.D.                         Vicki Vaughan-DeIlarci , Ph.D.
 Jean C. Parker, Ph.D.                             Peter E. Voytek, Ph.D.
Wi I Ham E. Pepelko, Ph.D.
 Dharm V. Singh, D.V.M., Ph.D.
 Todd W. Thorslund, Sc.D.

REVIEWERS

     The following individuals provided  peer review of the mutagenicity chapter  or

this document.

George R. Hoffman, Ph.D.
Department  of Biolony
 Ho ly Cr oss  ;,ol KV-'
Worcester,  MA

Stanley Zimmering, Ph.D.
Division of  Biology and Medicine
Brawn hnivers i ty
Providence,  RI

-------
      The  following  individuals  provided peer review of this draft and/or earlier

 drafts of this document.

 Harriet Ammann,  Ph.D.
 Environmental Criteria  and Assessment Office
 Office of Health  and Environmental Assessment
 Research  Triangle Park, NC

 Ila  Cote, Ph.D.
 Pollutant Assessment Branch
 Strategies and Air  Standards Division
 Office of Air Quality Planning  and Standards
 Research  Triangle Park, NC

 Daphne Kamely, Ph.D.
 Exposure  Assessment Group
 Office of Health  and Environmental Assessment
 Washington, DC

 Debdas Mukerjee,  Ph.D.
 Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office
 Office of Health  and Environmental Assessment
 Research  Triangle Park, NC

 David Patrick
 Pollutant Assessment Branch
 Strategies and Air  Standards Division
 Office* of Air Quality Planning  and Standards
 Research Triangle Park, NC

 Ani ta Schmidt
 Risk Management Branch
 Existing Chemical Assessment Division
 Office of Toxic Substances
 Washington,  DC

 Marvin A. Schneiderman, Ph.D.
 6503 E. Halbert Road
 Bethesda, MD

 Jeannette Wiltse, Ph.D.
 Risk Management Branch
 Existing Chemical Assessment Division
 Office of Toxic Substances
Washington,  i.«>:
                                    vn

-------
                          DRAFT—DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE



                          1.  SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS




1.1.  SUMMARY

     1,3-butadiene is a colorless gas with a slight aromatic odor at room


temperature and pressure.  It is used mainly by the styrene-butadiene rubber


and polybutadiene rubber industries.  No deaths and very few toxic effects have


been reported from acute exposure to the vapor.  The symptoms resulting from


acute exposures are lethargy, drowsiness, and irritation to the mucous membranes


of the eyes and the mouth.


    The available information on the mutagenicity of 1,3-butadiene is quite


limited in that only two studies have been reported.  Both studies, however,


indicate that 1,3-butadiene is a mutagen in Salmonella typhimurium.  The


mutagenicity is observed only in the presence of a liver S9 metabolic acti-


vation system.  No whole animal  studies have been reported.  These results


suggest that 1,3-butadiene is a promutagen in bacteria (i.e., its mutageni-
    *

city depends on metabolic activation).


     There is no information on the metabolism of 1,3-butadiene in humans.


In vitro data suggest that 1,3-butadiene is metabolized to 3,4-epoxybutene


and then to diepoxybutane.  Preliminary evidence in rats suggests that 1,3-

butadiene is metabolized to 3,4-epoxybutene in vivo (Bolt et al., 1983),


indicating that the metabolic pathway outlined on the basis of in vitro data


may occur in vivo.  More detailed studies by Bolt and his coworkers have been


published recently;  the results  of these studies will  be included in the final


document.


     3,4-Epoxybutene is a monofunctional alkylating agent and is  a direct-


acting mutagen in bacteria.   It  has  been tested in Klebsiella pneumoniae and

-------
                          DRAFT--DO NOT QUOTE  OR  CITE





Escherichia coli.  Diepoxybutane is a bifunctional  alkylating  agent,  and  as



such it can form cross-links between two strands  of DNA.   It is mutagenic in



bacteria (K. pneumoniae and S. typhimurium), fungi  (yeast  and  Neurospora



crassa), and the germ cells of Drosophila melanogaster.   It  also  induces  DNA



damage in cultured hamster cells and in mice,  is  clastogenic in fungi  and



cultured rat cells, and produces chromosome  damage/breakage  in D. melanogaster



germ cells.  Therefore, there is strong evidence  that  diepoxybutane  is  a  muta-



gen/clastogen in microbes and animals.



     Two lifetime inhalation carcinogenicity studies have  been carried  out in



mice and rats.  There was a marked increase  in incidences  of primary  tumors



among the exposed groups of mice in both sexes.  These tumors  included  lymphomas,



hemangiosarcomas, alveolar/bronchiolar adenomas (and carcinomas), acinar



cell carcinomas, granulosa cell  tumors or carcinomas,  forestornach papillomas



and carcinomas, and hepatocellular adenomas  and carcinomas.  The  study  had



to be-terminated at 60-61 weeks  instead of the planned 104 weeks  because  of



excessive deaths from the neoplasia among the  exposed  mice.



     In female rats (Sprague-Dawl ey)  exposed to 1,3-butadiene, increased  inci-



dences of mammary tumors, thyroid  follicular cell adenomas,  and uterine stromal



sarcomas were observed.  In the  male rats, increases in tumor  incidences  were



found in the exposed  animals in  the form of  Leydig  cell tumors and exocrine



pancreatic adenomas.   Zymbal gland tumors were increased  in  both  sexes  of ex-



posed rats.  The tumor sites involved were different in the mice  and  rats among



the exposed groups.  The severity  of the cancers  was also  widely  different; in



the rats, no increase in mortality secondary to neoplasia  was  observed, and



there was no early termination of  the experiments.   In addition to the  dif-



ferences found in the two sexes, rats were affected  less than  mice.

-------
                          DRAFT—DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE





     Epidemiclogic studies of the potential health hazards associated with



 1,3-butadiene exposure are limited.  There are a number of occupational studies



 of  rubber workers, but only a few of these studies were considered relevant for



 this review.  These studies concerned workers who were specifically identified



 as  having worked in the production of synthetic 1,3-butadiene rubber or as



 having worked in a synthetic rubber plant.  Of the three studies on workers



 specifically identified as being exposed to styrene-1,3-butadiene, two of them



 also included workplace air sampling.  In one study, air samples were analyzed



 for 1,3-butadiene, styrene, and benzene.  In the other study, the air concen-



 trations for 1,3-butadiene, benzene, styrene, and toluene were reported.  Both



 of these studies found that the time-weighted average for each of the chemical



 exposures examined was well below the American Conference of Governmental



 Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) threshold limit values (TLV) at that time for



 these chemicals (1,3-butadiene:  TLV = 1,000 ppm; styrene:  TLV = 100 ppm;



 toluene: TLV = 100 ppm; benzene: TLV = 10 ppm).  One of the studies was a



 cross-sectional investigation designed to look at certain hematologic parameters,



 This investigation revealed no evidence of any hematologic abnormality in  the



 study population.



     A case-control study of deaths among rubber plant workers from cancer of



 certain sites,  diabetes mellitus, and ischemic heart disease found workers in



the synthetic rubber area of the plant to have the highest risk ratio for



deaths from lymphatic and hematopoietic cancer (ICD 200-209).   The same authors,



however, had previously found an association  of lymphatic  leukemia cancer



(:>*{",, wua of gin,c solvent exposures in the  rubber industry.



     A cohort study of styrene-butadiene rubber (SBR)  workers  found that the



Standardized Mortality Ratio (SMR)  for lymphatic and hematopoietic cancer  was



of borderline significance for a subcohort of workers  employed at  one  plant

-------
                          DRAFT—DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE





during the time when a batch production process was in operation.   Here again,



solvent exposure may have been a confounding factor.   There is also some limited



evidence that styrene may be a carcinogen, and in particular,  a leukemogen.



This factor poses further complications for evaluating the epidemiologic studies



of SBR workers with regard to 1,3-butadiene.



     A cohort mortality study of rubber plant workers found that an excess of



lung cancer deaths occurred among workers in the synthetic rubber  area of the



plant.  This was based on only three deaths, however, and there was no control



for smoking.



     A large cohort study of almost 14,000 SBR workers at eight plants found



none of the SMRs for cancer to be significantly elevated.  Some bias may have



occurred, however, due to a possible underascertainment of total deaths and  a



possible overestimation of deaths among blacks.  Given the inconsistency of



results from different studies, the possible confounding due to exposure to



solvents, styrene, and possibly other chemicals, and  the potential  biases



in some of the studies, the epidemiologic data would  have to be considered



inadequate for evaluating whether a causal association exists  between



1,3-butadiene exposure and cancer in humans.



     Based on the linearized multistage model, a maximum likelihood estimate of



incremental unit risk was calculated for 1,3-butadiene, using  the  geometric



mean from the pooled male and pooled female significant tumor  responses of the



NTP mouse study.  The mean value of q^  = 9.0 x 10"3 (ppm) was  then  used to pre-



dict human responses in several epidemiologic studies, and the predicted and



actual responses were compared.  The comparisons were hampered by  a scarcity of



information concerning actual exposures, age distributions,  and work histories.



In addition, because there was no consistent cancer response across all  of the



studies, the most predominant response, cancer of the lymphatic and hemato-

-------
                          DRAFT--DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE





poietic tissues, was chosen as being the target for 1,3-butadiene.   Based on



the comparisons between the predicted and observed human response,  the extrapo-



lated unit risk value from the mice data appeared slightly high,  but in view of



the uncertainties in the epidemiologic data, no better estimate can be made at



this time.



1.2.  CONCLUSIONS



     1,3-butadiene has been shown to be an indirect mutagen in bacteria.   One



of its potential metabolites, diepoxybutane, is mutagenic in prokaryote as well



as eukaryote test systems.  Exposure of rodents to 1,3-butadiene  results  in



ovarian tumors in mice (Huff et al., 1985) and testicular tumors  in rats



(Hazleton Laboratories Europe, Ltd., 1981a).  Therefore, these data are sug-



gestive that 1,3-butadiene may present a heritable risk to humans.   However,



additional studies in mammalian test systems, as outlined in the  Agency's Pro-



posed Guidelines for Mutagenicity Risk Assessment (1984), should  be conducted



to further characterize the mutagenic potential of 1,3-butadiene.



     On the basis of sufficient evidence from studies in two species of



rodents, and inadequate epidemiologic data,  1,3-butadiene can be  classified,



according to the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classifi-



cation scheme, as a "probable" human carcinogen, Group 2B.  It was  placed in



Sub-Group B because of the inadequacy of the available epidemiologic data.



Using the newly proposed EPA classification  scheme for carcinogenicity evidence,



the ranking would be B2, meaning that 1,3-butadiene is a "probable" human



carci nogen.



     Using a linearized multistage model,  a  95% upper-limit incremental unit



risk for 1,3-butadiene is estimated from a NTP mouse study to be  q^ =  6.5



x 10~2 (ppm).   In addition to a 95% upper-limit incremental  unit  risk, a  mea-



sure of carcinogenic potency was determined  for 1,3-butadiene.  Among  the 54

-------
                          DRAFT—00 NOT QUOTE  OR  CITE

chemicals that the CAG has evaluated as suspect carcinogens,  1,3-butadiene
ranks fairly low in potency,  placing at the  top of  the  fourth quartile.

-------
                          OKAFT--UO NOT QUOTE OR CITE





                                2.  INTRODUCTION








     1,3-Butadiene (CAS No, 106-99-00) is a colorless gas produced as an ethy-



lene coproduct, by oxidative dehydrogenation of n-butenes, or by dehydrogena-



tion of n-butanes.  In 1977, between 2.1 and 7.3 billion pounds of 1,3-butadiene



were produced or imuorced.  1,3-Butaaiene ranked 36th in U.S. domestic chemical



production in 1983.   it, > ?. usec as an intermediate in the production of poly-



mers, elastomers, and othtr cnemitals.  The major use of 1,3-butadiene is in



the manufacture cf styri-rif-but-ic:1 ene rubber (synthetic rubber).  In addition,



1,3-butadiene is uc.ed -s ?>;• viiv mediate to produce a variety of industrial



chemicals, including  tr.t  fi,jv;!i<. < des.  capr.an and captofol .  The U.S. Food and



Drug Administration has approved 1,3-butadiene for use in the production of




adhesives used in cental •  types of food containers.



     Although 1,3-butadiene has '^en found in U.S. drinking water, it is pri-



marily an air contannnant.  It has been detected in cigarette smoke, incinera-



tion products of fossil fuels, gasoline vapor, and automotive exhaust.  Con-



centrations ranging froip j to  5 pob have been detected in urban air.  Higher



concentrations, up to 45 pom,  have been reported in air samples and factory



emissions at petrochemical plants.



     Approximately 62,000 workers are exposed annually to 1,3-butadiene.  Occu-



pational exposure to  1,3-butadiene occurs mainly through inhalation and, to a



lasser extent, by dermal  contact.  Most occupational exposures occur in plants



manufacturing 1,3-butadiene or using it to produce polymers or elastomers.  The



 ••rrent peri.i \ ss i t: i e exposure limit of 1,000 ppm as an 8-hour time-weighted



average was adopted by tnp Occupational  Safety and Health Administration from



the 1968 Threshold Limit  Values (TLV) set by the American Conference of Govern-



mental industrial Hygiemsts (AC'^JH).  In 1983, the ACGIH, based on the findings






                                       7

-------
                          DRAFT—DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE





in experimental animals, gave notice of intention to list the material  as an



industrial substance suspected of carcinogenic potential  for man and to remove



the TLV.  The National Institute for Occupational Safety  and Health (NIOSH),



considering the same animal  information, issued a Current Intelligence  Bulletin



recommending that the occupational  exposure be reduced to the lowest feasible



level  because of the potential for  the compound to produce cancer.



     The National Toxicology Program is currently undertaking a series  of in-



vestigations of 1,3-butadiene.  These studies will  provide information  on the



pharmacokinetics and toxicity of the chemical.  The reason for the  apparent



differences in sensitivity between  the rat and mouse are  to be investigated.



In addition, the carcinogenic response at  lower airborne  concentrations  may  be



establi shed.

-------
                          DRAFT—DO NUT QUOTE OR CITE





         3.  MUTAGENICITY OF 1,3-BUTADIENE AND ITS REACTIVE METABOLITES







     This chapter deals with the mutagenicity of 1,3-butadiene,  which  is a gas



at room temperature, and also includes a discussion of the metabolism  of 1,3-



butadiene and the mutagenicity of its reactive metabolites (3,4-epoxybutene and



l,2:3,4-diepoxybutane).  The available evidence suggests that 1,3-butadiene is



mutagenic by virtue of its metabolism to mutagenic intermediates.



3.1.  MUTAGENICITY OF 1,3-BUTADIENE



     1,3-Butadiene was tested for its mutagenic potential  in the Salmonella



typhimurium histidine reversion assay by de Meester et al. (1980).   The sample



of 1,3-butadiene studied was 99.5% pure and was obtained from Matheson Gas Pro-



ducts, Belgium.  Salmonella strain TA1530 was exposed to 1,3-butadiene for 24



hours at 0, 4, 8, 16, 24, and 32% (vol/vol) in controlled atmospheres  in desic-



cators.  In the absence of S9 mix or in the presence of S9 prepared from un-



treated, rats, no increase in the revertant frequency was observed.   However,



when the bacteria were exposed to 1,3-butadiene in the presence  of  S9  mix pre-



pared from phenobarbitone or Aroclor 1254-pretreated rats, mutagenic activity



was observed.  The number of histidine revertants increased in a dose-related



fashion from 17 per plate in the absence of 1,3-butadiene up to  255 per plate



at 16% (vol/vol) 1,3-butadiene.  These results suggest that 1,3-butadiene



itself is not a mutagen, and that it is metabolized into mutagenic  metabolic



intermediates that cause base-pair substitutions.



     Data suggesting that the mutagenic metabolites are volatile were  also



reported by de Meester et al. (1980).  When plates containing bacteria and



phenobarbitone or Aroclor-induced S9 mix were coincubated in 4 to 32%  1,3-



butadiene atmospheres with plates containing only the bacteria,  mutant colo-



nies appeared on both sets of plates.  The number of mutant colonies was pro-

-------
                          DRAFT—DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE





portional to the level of i,3-butadiene in the desiccators up to 16%.



     A small study by Poncelet et al.  (1980) supports the conclusion of de



Meester et al. (1980) on the mutayenic potential of 1,3-butadiene in Salmonella



strain TA1530.  Mutagenic effects were observed when the assays were performed



in a 16% gaseous atmosphere of 1,3-butadiene in the presence of Aroclor-induced



S9 mix.  When the bacteria were exposed to 1,3-butadiene under the conditions



of the plate incorporation method or preincubation in liquid medium, mutageni-



city was not observed.  The 1,3-butadiene sample was 99.5% pure and was obtained



from Matheson Gas Products, Belgium.



     In summary, the two available studies suggest that 1,3-butadiene is a



promutayen in bacteria; its mutagenicity depends on metabolic activation by a



chemically induced S9 mix.  No animal  studies have been reported.



3.2.  METABOLISM OF 1,3-BUTADIENE AND  REACTION OF METABOLITES WITH DNA



     As described in the previous section, 1,3-butadiene itself does not appear



to be rautagenic.  Mutagenic activity is observed only when 1,3-butadiene has



been metabolized to reactive intermediates.  A scheme for the metabolism of 1,3-



butadiene and the DNA binding potential  of the probable metabolites are briefly



discussed in this section.



     Malvoisin et al. (1979) and Malvoisin and Roberfroid (1982) studied the



metabolism of 1,3-butadiene ij^ vitro using rat liver microsomes.  They reported



that the metabolism proceeds via a mixed-function oxidase-catalyzed oxidation



to 3,4-epoxybutene, and they suggest that this compound is subsequently metabo-



lized to l,2:3,4-diepoxybutane (diepoxybutane) and 3-butene-l,2-diol (Figure



1).  Both 3,4-epoxybutene and diepoxybutane are probably reactive intermediates,



whereas 3-butene-l,2-diol and its metabolite 3,4-epoxy-l,2-butanediol are pro-



bably detoxification products.  Preliminary evidence in rats suggests that 1,3-



butadiene is metaboliz'ed to 3,4-epoxybutene in vivo (Bolt et al., 1983).  Both





                                       10

-------
          Epoxide
         hydrolase
    CH2=CH-CHOH-CH2OH

    3-Butene-l,2-diol
            I
                           CH2=CH-CH=CH2

                           1,3-Butadiene
                                 NADPH
                                 02,  microsomes
                           CH2=CH-CH-CH2
                                  \/
                                    0

                           3,4-Epoxybutene
NADPH
02, microsomes
  NADPH
02, microsomes


        A
CH2-CH-CH-CH2

   0

l,2:3,4-Diepoxybutane
    CH2-CH-CHOH-CH2OH
     V
    3,4-Epoxy-l,2-butanediol
Figure 1.  A hypothetical  scheme for  the  metabolism  of  1,3-butadiene.

SOURCE:  Malvoisin and Roberfroid,  1982.
                                   11

-------
                           DRAFT—DO  NOT  QUOTE  OR  CITE





 3,4-epoxybutene and diepoxybutane  are  mutagenic,  as  described more  fully



 below.   No  information  is  available  on the mutagenicity of  3-butene-l,2-diol



 and  3,4-epoxy-l,2-butanediol.



      The  alkylating ability  of the two reactive metabolites of  1,3-butadiene



 (3,4-epoxybutene  and diepoxybutane)  has  been investigated,  each  in  a  single



 study.   Hemminki  et al.  (1980) found that 3,4-epoxybutene alkylated 4-(p-nitro-



 benzyl)-pyridine  (NBP)  and deoxyguanosine, which  are nucleophiles that were used



 as models for  DNA.   The  NBP  reaction was carried  out at 37°C using the test



 compound  at  0.286 pM.   The deoxyguanosine reaction was carried out at 37°C



 using the test  compound  at 0.1 M.  In both cases, aliquots of the reaction



 mixture were assayed  for alkylation at 0 minutes, 20 minutes, 1  hour, 3 hours,



 and  5 hours.   The reaction rates were determined  from the initial rates.  The



 results were calculated  using epichlorohydrin as  a reference.  3,4-Epoxybutene



 alkylated NBP  and deoxyguanosine at rates that were 31% and 14%, respectively,



 of thai of epichlorohydrin.  The alkylation activity correlated with mutageni-



 city in Escherichia coli WP2 uvrA,  as described in the next section.



     Lawley and Brookes  (1967) reported that diepoxybutane reacts with DNA in



 a manner typical of bifunctional  alkylating agents and causes interstrand cross-



 linking in DNA.  Salmon  sperm DNA was dissolved in 0.5 mM sodium citrate at 2



mg/mL (5.4 mM DNA phosphorus) and 25 mL was treated with redistilled diepoxybu-



tane (2.4 mg/mL, 28 mM) at 37°C.   Samples were  withdrawn after 2, 5, 7,  24, 48,



 72,  120, 168, and 193 hours.   Ultraviolet spectroscopy was used to measure the



 reaction of diepoxybutane with DNA.  At 37°C,  diepoxybutane reacted with DNA



slowly,  as shown by changes in ultraviolet absorption of the reaction  mixtures.



     The extent of interstrand cross-linking  (i.e.,  covalent linkage of  the two



DNA strands  by the reaction of diepoxybutane  with  a  nucleotide base in each



DNA strand)  was studied by measuring  the  reversible  denaturation (renaturation)





                                       12

-------
                          DRAFT—DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE





of diepoxybutane-treated DNA.  In this experiment, diepoxybutane-treated DNA



was first incubated at 60°C for various time periods and then rapidly cooled.



At 60°C, untreated DNA denatures when it is dissolved in a solution of low



ionic strength (i.e., the two strands separate).  When cooled, the DNA rena-



tures (i.e., the two strands rejoin to reform the typical double-stranded DNA



molecule).  Diepoxybutane-treated DNA renatured to a greater extent than did



normal untreated DNA, suggesting that diepoxybutane-treated DNA was cross-linked



by a diepoxybutane bridge covalently joining the two DNA strands.



     In summary, the above two studies indicate that 3,4-epoxybutene and



diepoxybutane can alkylate DNA and that diepoxybutane causes interstrand cross-



links in DNA.



3.3.  MUTAGENICITY OF 3,4-EPOXYBUTENE



     The mutagenic potential of 3,4-epoxybutene was studied in the fluctuation



test with Klebsiella pneumoniae as the test organism (Voogd et al., 1981).  The



compound was obtained from K and N (ICN, Life Sciences Division, New York), was



analytical grade, and was not further purified.  The chemical  was dissolved and



diluted in dimethylsulfoxide and subsequently added to broth which was inoculated



with the test organism.  The genetic characteristic studied was streptomycin



resistance.  The average spontaneous mutation rate for streptomycin resistance



was 0.1676 x 10~9.  Triplicate experiments were averaged, and the results were



expressed as the quotient of the observed and spontaneous mutation rates.  At 1



and 2 mM 3,4-epoxybutene, the quotients were 1.7 and 2.5, respectively, provi-



ding suggestive evidence of a dose-related positive response.



     Besides studying the alkylating activity of 3,4-epoxybutene, Hemminki et



al. (1980) studied its mutagenicity in a tryptophan-requiring  strain of £.



coli.   The concentrations of 3,4-epoxybutene used were not specified but were



based  on toxicity determinations.   Bacteria of strain WP2 uvrA were inci/bated





                                       13

-------
                          DRAFT--DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE





with the chemical for 18 hours at 37°C, after which aliquots were plated onto



minimal ayar to detect reversion to tryptophan prototrophy and onto nutrient



agar containiny tryptophan to determine the total  number of cells.   Althouyh



the study suygests that 3,4-epoxybutene is mutagenic in E_. coin  WP2 uvrA, there



was no indication of a dose-related response; the result for only one dose was



reported and that dose was unspecified.  Althouyh this study is  of  limited use



for risk assessment purposes, it supports the study of Voogd et  al. (1981) in



suggesting that 3,4-epoxybutene is mutagenic in bacteria.



3.4.  GENOTOXICITY OF 1,2:3,4-DIEPOXYBUTANE



3.4.1.  Studies in Bacteria



     Voogd et al. (1981) investigated the mutagenic potential  of diepoxybutane



in J<. pneumoniae in the same paper cited previously for the mutagenicity of



3,4-epoxybutene.  The source of the diepoxybutane was Merck (Darmstadt, F.R.G.);



it was of analytical grade and was not further purified.  At an  equal  chemical



concentration (1 mM), diepoxybutane was approximately 16 times as mutagenic as



3,4-epoxybutene.  The quotients of observed and spontaneous rates of mutation



to streptomycin resistance for 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, and 1 mM diepoxybutane were



1.7, 3.1, 6.2, 15.7, and 27, respectively.  These results clearly indicate that



diepoxybutane is mutagenic in J<. pneumoniae and provide strong evidence of a



dose-related response as well.



     Diepoxybutane is also mutagenic in the ^. typhimurium histidine reversion



assay (Wade et al., 1979).  Plate incorporation assays were performed with



strains TA98 and TA100, and averages of two to five determinations  were reported,



At 0.02, 0.10, and 0.50 mg of diepoxybutane per plate, there were 196, 325, and



663 revertant colonies per plate with strain TA100 and 32, 22, and  29 revertant



colonies per plate with strain TA98.  These results suggest that diepoxybutane



is a base-pair substitution mutagen in S_. typhimurium because it produced a





                                       14

-------
                          DRAFT--DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE





 dose-related positive  response  in strain *TA100.  Although strain TA100 is not



 specific for mutagens  that induce base-pair substitutions, it responds well to



 such mutagens, and the  result in strain TA98, which detects many frameshift



 mutagens, was negative.



 3.4.2.  Studies  in Fungi



     The mutagenic potential of diepoxybutane in the yeast Saccharomyces



 cerevisiae was studied  by Olszewska and Kilbey (1975).  They used a diploid



 yeast strain that is homozygous for the ilv mutation and therefore requires



 isoleucine and valine to grow.  Kinetic studies of the induction of revertants



 were carried out by treating cells for various times with 0.1 M diepoxybutane at



 25°C.  About 1.2 x 106  to 1.5 x 106 cells were plated per petri  dish.  Diepoxy-



 butane induced an increase in i1v reversions with increasing time of exposure



 up to 20 minutes.  At 5, 10, 15, and 20 minutes, the number of ilv+ revertants



 per 106 cells was about 3, 10,  20, and 38, respectively.  Reversion of the ilv



 mutation indicates that diepoxybutane induces point mutations in yeast.



     Zaborowska et al.  (1983) have shown that diepoxybutane induces mitotic



 crossing-over and mitotic gene conversion in the SBTD and D7 strains of _S.



 cerevisiae.  Stationary-phase cells were suspended in phosphate buffer at 2 x



 lO^/mL.  The cells were treated with 0.4% (vol/vol) diepoxybutane (Merck, purity



 not specified) at 30°C  for 15, 30, and 45 minutes.  The treatment was terminated



 by centrifuging and washing cells twice with buffer.



     The results of these experiments are shown in Table 1.   The frequency of



mitotic crossing-over in the SBTD strain was dose (exposure  time) related.



Dose-dependence of mitotic crossing-over in strain D7 is less clear.  Dose-related



 increases  in mitotic gene conversion were obtained in both strains.   Taken



together,  these results indicate that diepoxybutane is recombinogenic in yeast,



and recombinogenicity is an indication of DNA damage.





                                       15

-------
                          DRAFT--DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE
TABLE 1.  INDUCTION OF MITOTIC GENE CONVERSION AND MITOTIC CROSSING-OVER IN
                             SBTD AND D7 STRAINS OF
                         S. cerevisiae BY DIEPOXYBUTANE
Exposure to 0.4%
diepoxybutane (min)
SBTD strain
0
15
30
45
D7 strain
0
15
30
Survival
100
100
93.2
41.3
100
100
78.4
Mitotic
crossovers (%)
0
1.4
2.8
6.1
0
1.5
1.7
Convertants3
0.7
86.6
167.1
515.2
0
40.4
278.0
aConvertants calculated per 107 survivors in the SBTD strain and per 106
 survivors in the D7 strain.

SOURCE:   Zaborowska et al., 1983.
                                       16

-------
                           DRAFT—DO  NOT QUOTE OR CITE





      Luker  and  Kilbey  (1982)  reported that diepoxybutane causes point mutations



 and multigenic  deletions  in Neurospora crassa.  They developed a Neurospora



 heterokaryon  in which  both point mutations and deletions can be detected by



 the use  of  selective techniques.   Point mutations were scored by reversion to



 adenine  independence.  Deletions were detected by first assaying for resistance •



 to £-fluorophenylalanine  (pFPA) and  then testing for sensitivity to cycloheximide.



 These two genes are closely linked on chromosome V.



      Information on the source and purity of the sample of diepoxybutane studied



 was not  provided.  Suspensions of  Neurospora conidia were treated for various



 times with  0.1  M diepoxybutane in  0.067 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) at 27°C.



 The treatments  were terminated by  filtering off the mutagenic solution and



 washing  the cells with 10% sodium thiosulfate solution.  Diepoxybutane induced



 dose  (exposure  time) related  increases in both adenine reversions and pFPA



 resistance, as  shown in Table 2.   The results shown in Table 3 suggest that



 about ope-fourth of the pFPA-resistant mutants were deletions rather than



 point mutations because pFPA  resistance was associated with sensitivity to



 cycloheximide 26.3% of the time.  The evidence therefore shows that diepoxybutane



 is both  mutagenic and clastogenic in Neurospora.



 3.4.3.   Studies in Mammalian Cells



    The  results of a study by Dean and Hodson-Walker (1979) suggest that



 diepoxybutane is a powerful clastogen in cultured rat liver epithelial  cells.



 The sample of diepoxybutane studied was obtained  from Fluka A.G.,  Switzerland.



 Its purity was  not described.   The epithelial-like cell line used,  designated



 RL}, is  neardiploid, having a  chromosome number  of 44 or 45 (compared to the



normal number of 42 in  the rat karyotype).   The  appropriate concentrations  of



diepoxybutane for testing were determined  from cytotoxicity studies.   Because



diepoxybutane is volatile, sealed flask  cultures  of  the rat liver  cells  were




                                       17

-------
                          DRAFT—DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE
TABLE 2.  INDUCTION OF ADENINE REVERSIONS AND pFPA RESISTANCE IN N. crassa



BY
0.1 M
DIEPOXYBUTANE
Heterokaryotic
conidia screened
(x 106) for
Treatment
(min)
0
10
20
30
Survi
(%)
100
78
60
40
val
.0
.1
.4
.8
ad+
15
6
5
2
.64
.90
.54
.53
pFPA
resistant
4.
1.
1.
0.
17
38
13
51
Number of
mutants
scored
ad +
5
22
34
53
fpr
2
12
21
21
Mutation
frequency
x lO'6
ad
0
3
6
20
-t-
.32
.19
.03
.95
fprr
0.48
8.70
18.58
41.18
SOURCE:   Luker and Kilbey, 1982.
           TABLE 3.  ANALYSIS OF pFPAr MUTANTS AS PUTATIVE DELETIONS
Treatment
with 0.1 M
diepoxybutane
(mi n )
10
15
20
30
45
60
Total
Number of
pFPA-resistant
mutants
tested
12
7
41
94
25
11
190

Number acqui ri ng
sensitivity to
cycloheximide
5
2
10
21
10
2
50

Putative
deletions
(%)
42
29
24
22
40
18
26.3
SOURCE:   Luker and Kilbey, 1982.
                                       18

-------
                          DRAFT —DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

used.  The cell cultures were exposed to diepoxybutane for 24 hours, and colcemid
at 0.3 yg/rnL was added 2 hours before harvesting the cells with 0.25% trypsin.
Distilled water was added to the harvested cells to produce hypotonic conditions.
The cells were fixed in methanol/acetic acid (3:1).  Chromosome preparations
were made by air-drying the cells on microscope slides and staining with Giemsa.
The slides were randomly coded, and 100 metaphases from each slide were analyzed
for structural chromosome changes.  Diepoxybutane was a powerful clastogenic
agent, producing chromosome damage in a dose-related manner (Table 4).
    Perry and Evans (1975) reported that exposure of cultured Chinese hamster
ovary cells to diepoxybutane resulted in a dose-related induction in sister
chromatid exchanges (SCEs).  SCE involves the reciprocal exchange of DNA seg-
ments between sister chromatids and is considered an indication of DNA damage.
The cells were treated with 10 yM bromodeoxyuridene and 0.3 yM or 3 yM
diepoxybutane for two cycles of DNA replication before treatment with colcemid
(2 hours at 0.2 pM), collection by mitotic shakeoff, pretreatment with 75 mM
KC1, and fixation in methanol/acetic acid (3:1).  Twenty mitotic cells were
scored for each dose.  Total SCEs at 0, 0.3, and 3 yM diepoxybutane were 244,
403, and 1818, respectively.
3.4.4.  In vivo Studies
     Studies of the mutagenic potential of diepoxybutane in whole animals have
been carried out in mice and Drosophila melanogaster (fruit flies).
     Conner et al. (1983) studied the ability of diepoxybutane to induce J_n_
vivo SCE in bone marrow, alveolar macrophages, and regenerating liver cells in
mice.  The sample of diepoxybutane studied was 97% pure and was obtained from
Aldrich Chemical Co.  It was dissolved in phosphate-buffered saline just prior
to injection.  The dose-response studies were performed in three intact and
three partially hepatectomized Swiss Webster mice (mean weight of 27 g).

                                       19

-------
                          DRAFT—DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE
      TABLE 4.  EFFECTS OF DIEPOXYBUTANE ON CHROMOSOMES OF RAT LIVER CELLS

Diepoxybutane
(yg/mL)
0
0.1
0.5
l.Q
Number
of cells
analyzed
269
117
24
29
Chromatid
gaps
(*)
2.6
11.1
8.3
0
Chromatid
deletions
(*)
0.4
4.3
20.8
0
Chromatid
exchanges
(%)
0
8.b
33.3
3.4
Chromosome
aberrations
(%)
0.4
0.9
0
0
SOURCE:   Dean and Hodson-Walker, 1979.
                                       20

-------
                           DRAFT—DO  NOT  QUOTE OR CITE





 Diepoxybutane  (10-291  ymol/kg) was injected  intraperitoneally just prior to



 bromodeoxyuridine  infusion  (10 mg/mL;  intravenous flow  rate of 3.6 mL/24 hours),



 Colchicine  (3.3 mg/kg) was  then  injected intraperitoneally.  Bone marrow and



 alveolar macrophage  cells  from intact  mice and  regenerating liver cells from



 hepatectomized  mice  were harvested 4 hours later.  As shown in Table 5, diepoxy-



 butane  produced similar dose-dependent responses for SCE in bone marrow, alveo-



 lar macrophages, and regenerating liver cells.  Conner  et al. (1983) also



 reported that the  DNA  lesions did not  persist beyond one cell cycle.  These



 results show that  diepoxybutane  is very effective in producing a dose-dependent



 SCE response, but  that the  initially induced lesions disappear in subsequent



 division cycles.



     A  positive response for diepoxybutane in the sex-linked recessive lethal



 test in Drosophila was reported  in two studies  from the same laboratory.  The



 sex-linked  recessive lethal test is a useful  assay for testing the mutagenic



 potential of chemicals in the germ line of an intact animal.  In the first



 study,  Sankaranarayanan (1983) exposed wild-type Berlin-K adult 3 or 4-day-old



 male flies  to 2 mM diepoxybutane in 5% sucrose  by feeding for 48 hours.  The



 diepoxybutane sample studied was obtained from  Fluka, A.G., Switzerland.  Infor-



 mation  on its purity was not reported.  The males were mated to Oster females



 to raise three  successive 2-day broods (A, B, and C), and the Fj female progeny



 were used in the tests for  lethals.  Brood A tests mature spermatozoa,  brood 8



 tests late spermatids,  and brood C tests  early spermatids.   The results are



 shown in Table  6.   A concurrent no-exposure control  was  not done in  this study



 or in the subsequent study described below.  However, a  historical  control



 value for Drosophila of 0.18% has been established in the same  laboratory  from



the evaluation of  13,151 chromosomes  (Vogel,  1976).   The results  suggest that



diepoxybutane is a strong inducer of  sex-linked  recessive lethal  mutations





                                       21

-------
                           DRAFT—DO  NOT  QUOTE OR  CITE
     TABLE  5.   SCE  FREQUENCIES  INDUCED  IN BONE MARROW, ALVEOLAR MACROPHAGES,
                AND REGENERATING  LIVER  CELLS OF SWISS WEBSTER MICE
                       FOLLOWING  INJECTION OF DIEPOXYBUTANE
Diepoxybutane
(u mol/kg)
Hepatectomized






0
10
39
97
193
291
mice
4
7
8
10
22
32
Bone

.2
.2
.1
.9
.3
.0
Aa
± °
± °
+_ 1
i 1
± 3
± 6
marrow

.6
.9
.4
.5
.5
.6
Bb
66
63
72
63
44
22

3
7
9
13
23
30
Alveolar
macrophages
A B
.5 ^
.9 +_
.8 i
.4 +
.6 +_
.4 +.
0.6
0.4
1.0
3.4
4.5
4.9
77
71
70
75
59
23
Regenerating
liver
A B
3.7 +_ 0.9 80
7.0 +_ 1.4 73
11.9 +_ 2.6 69
14.9 +_ 4.0 69
28.9 +_ 6.1 43
31.1 +_ 5.9 29
Intact mice






0
10
39
97
193
291
3
5
8
9
14
27
.0
.4
.8
.7
.6
.3
± °
1 °
± °
+_ 1
± 2
± 3
.8
.6
.8
.5
.1
.7
64
58
63
63
43
46
3
6
10
12
17
28
.6 +_
.7 +
•2 ±
.8 +_
.1 +.
.6 +_
0.5
1.2
0.3
2.3
2.2
3.8
63
54
57
62
41
42






aMean SCE/cell +_ S.D. of three mice at each dose.   Individual  animal  means
 were calculated from SCEs scored in 20 cells of each type.
      number of second division cells observed in  100 consecutive metaphases,
SOURCE:  Conner et al., 1983.
                                       22

-------
                           DRAFT—DO  NOT  QUOTE  OR  CITE
      TABLE  6.   FREQUENCIES OF  SEX-LINKED  RECESSIVE  LETHALS  INDUCED  BY  2  mM
            DIEPOXYBUTANE  IN  POSTMEIOTIC MALE GERM CELLS OF  Drosophila
Experimental                     Number of          	Lethals
strain            Brood3         chromosomes        Number         %


Berlin-Kb           A              800               42          6.5
                    B              914               32          4.8
                    C              840               30          4.6

Canton-Sc

  Experiment 1      A              934               88          9.4
                    B              949               68          7.2
                    C              960               66          6.9

  Experiment 2      A              938               64          6.8
                    B              951               54          5.7
                    C              350               14          4.0

Ebonyc

  Experiment 1      A              932               88          9.4
                    B              912               65          7.1
                    C              925               56          6.1

  Experiment 2      A              876               57          6.5
                    B              924               41          4.4
                    C              885               33          3.7


aBrood A corresponds to treatment of mature spermatozoa; Brood B corresponds
 to late spermatids; and Brood C corresponds to early spermatids.
bTaken from Sankaranarayanan, 1983.
GTaken from Sankaranarayanan et al., 1983.
                                       23

-------
                          DRAFT—DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE





(6.5%, 4.8%, and 4.6% compared to the historical control  value of 0.18%).   The



results also indicate that mature spermatozoa (brood A)  respond with higher fre-



quencies of recessive lethals than late and early spermatids (broods B and C).



     Similar positive results (Table 6) were obtained in  a later study in  Dro-



sophila (Sankaranarayanan et al., 1983).  The experimental details in this



study were identical  to those described above, except that Canton-S and ebony



males were exposed to diepoxybutane and mated to Muller-5 females.  Accordingly,



the strong mutagenic response appears to be independent  of the strains employed.



The strongly positive results in the sex-linked recessive lethal test provide



clear evidence that diepoxybutane reaches the gonads and  is strongly mutagenic



in germ cells of Drosophila.



     There is evidence that diepoxybutane induces chromosome damage in germ



cells of Drosophila (Zimmering, 1983).  Treated males carried an X chromosome



in the form of a closed ring and a Y chromosome carrying  dominant markers, one



at the end of long arm of the Y and one at the end of the short arm.  The  males



were permitted to feed on a solution of 1.25 mM diepoxybutane in 5% sucrose for



24 hours and then mated with repair-proficient (ordinary) females or to repair-



deficient females.  There was no evidence of toxicity in  the treated males.



The F]_ offspring were scored for complete loss of the X  or Y chromosomes (in



ring-X males, virtually all complete loss is attributable to ring loss) and for



partial loss of the Y chromosome, indicated by the loss  of one but not both of



the Y chromosome markers.  Complete loss indicates chromosome breakage and/or



sister chromatid exchange.  Partial loss of the Y chromosome is a consequence



of breakage.  Results shown in Table 7 provide evidence  of a relatively strong



effect on complete loss (5-6%) and a significant increase in partial loss  which



is most apparent from matings with the repair-deficient  females (approx. 3%).



     In summary, the results of the Drosophila experiments assaying for sex-





                                       24

-------
                          ORAFT--DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE
                    TABLE 7.  CHROMOSOME LOSS IN Drosophlla
               FROM MATINGS OF MALES WITH REPAIR-PROFICIENT (RP)
                       AND REPAIR-DEFICIENT (RD) FEMALES
Series
Female
                       Percent Induced
Complete   Partial    Complete     Partial
loss       loss      loss         loss
Control RP
Treated
Control RD
Treated
8551
7390
3178
1285
51
515
30
82
0
8 6.37
2
39 5.44

0.11

2.97
All induced frequencies are statistically significant at or below the 0.01 level
The repair-deficient mutant was mei-9a, which is deficient in excision repair.

SOURCE:  Zimrnering, 1983.
                                       25

-------
                          DRAFT—DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE



 linked recessive lethals and chromosome loss provide strong evidence that


 diepoxybutane is a mutagenic and chromosome damaging agent in germ cells of


 Drosophila.  In addition, the results of the SCE assay in mice suggest that


 diepoxybutane is a DNA damaging agent in mice.


 3.5.  SUMMARY OF MUTAGENICITY STUDIES


     The available information on the mutagenicity of 1,3-butadiene is quite


 limited in that only two studies have been reported.  Both studies, however,


 indicate that 1,3-butadiene is a mutagen in S_. typhimurium.  The mutagenicity


 is observed only in the presence of a liver S9 metabolic activation system.


 No whole animal studies have been reported.  These results suggest that 1,3-


 butadiene is a promutagen in bacteria (i.e., its mutagenicity depends on


 metabolic activation).


     Mutagenic metabolites of 1,3-butadiene include 3,4-epoxybutene and diepoxy-


 butane.  3,4-Epoxybutene is a monofunctional alkylating agent and is a direct-


 acting mutagen in bacteria; it has been tested in J<. pneumoniae and E_. coli.
     *

     Diepoxybutane is a bifunctional alkylating agent and as such it can form


 cross-links between the two strands of DNA.  It is mutagenic in bacteria (K_.


 pneumoniae and S_. typhimurium), fungi (yeast and Neurospora), and the germ


 cells of Drosophila.  It also induces DNA damage in cultured hamster cells  and

 in mice, is clastogenic in fungi and cultured rat cells, and produces chromo-


 some damage/breakage in Drosophila germ cells.  Therefore, there is strong


 evidence that diepoxybutane is a mutagen/clastogen in microbes and animals.


     In summary, the weight of the available evidence suggests that 1,3-buta-


 diene is a mutagen by virtue of its metabolism to mutagenic intermediates,  par-


ticularly diepoxybutane.
                                       26

-------
                           DRAFT—DO  NOT  QUOTE OR CITE





                               4.   CARCINOGENICITY







      The  purpose  of  this  chapter is  to provide an evaluation of the likelihood



 that  1,3-butadiene is a human  carcinogen and, on the assumption that it i^s a



 human  carcinogen, to provide a basis  for estimating its public health impact



 and evaluating  its potency  in  relation to other carcinogens.  The evaluation of



 carcinogenicity depends heavily on animal bioassays and epidemiologic evidence.



 However,  additional  factors, including mutagenicity, pharmacokinetics, and



 other  toxicological  characteristics  have an important bearing on both the



 qualitative and quantitative assessment of carcinogenicity.  This section pre-



 sents  an  evaluation  of the  animal bioassays, the epidemiologic evidence, and



 the quantitative aspects  of risk assessment.



 4.1.   TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOKINETICS



      Information on  the toxicity of  1,3-butadiene resulting from acute exposure



 is limited.  The median lethal concentrations for mice and rats of 1,3-buta-



 diene  for periods of exposure ranging from 2 to 4 hours are above 100,000 ppm.



 The oral  LD^Q values for  rats and mice are 5.48 g/kg and 3.21 g/kg,  respectively.



 The major acute toxic effects are irritation of the respiratory tract,  mucous



 membranes, and eyes, and  narcosis (NTP, 1984).



     A teratogenicity study sponsored by the International  Institute of Synthe-



 tic Rubber Producers, Inc., was conducted at Hazleton  Laboratories Europe, Ltd.



 (1981b) in England.  Pregnant female Charles River  CD  rats  (Sprague-Dawley),



obtained from Charles River Ltd., were exposed to concentrations  of  200, 1,000,



and 8,000 ppm of 1,3-butadiene, 6 hours/day, on  days 6-15  of gestation.   The



rats  were observed daily and weighed at intervals during the study.   On day



20 of gestation the females were  killed,  necropsied, and the uterine contents



inspected.  One-third of each litter was  examined for  visceral  abnormalities,





                                       27

-------
                          DRAFT—DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE





and the remainder were examined for skeletal anomalies.  There were 24 female



rats assigned to each treatment group, and 40 were assigned to the control



group which was exposed to filtered air.



     The maternal animals were not affected by exposure to the 1,3-butadiene



except for reduced weight gain in those exposed to 8,000 ppm.  The authors



concluded, as a result of the maternal toxicity, that there was embryonic



growth retardation and slight embryolethality among all dose groups, and that



the magnitude of the effect was dose-related.  The relationship between mater-



nal toxicity and the fetal effects was a subjective judgment and not experimen-



tally established.  The authors further concluded that at the highest dose



there was an indication of teratogenicity based on the presence of major fetal



defects.  There was a significant increase in "minor" defects at the lowest



airborne concentration tested (200 ppm).  Whether this represents a qualitative



change in the dose-response or is due to other factors, such as maternal



toxicity, cannot be determined from the information available.  In an earlier



but inadequately reported study (Carpenter et al., 1944), decreases in litter



size were reported in rats exposed to 6,700 and 2,300 ppm, but not at 600 ppm.



     As detailed in the preceding section, in vitro studies have indicated



that 1,3-butadiene is metabolized in liver microsomes by P-450-dependent mixed-



function oxidases.  The biotransformation, although only partially confirmed by



in vivo experiments in rats (Bolt et al., 1983), could lead to the formation of



3,4-epoxybutene, then to l,2:3,4-diepoxybutane (diepoxybutane) or to 3-butene-



1,2-diol, then to 3,4-epoxy-l,2-butanediol, followed by the formation of ery-



thritol  (Malvoisin and Roberfroid, 1982).  In addition to being mutagenic,



diepoxybutane is classified,  in the Third Annual Report on Carcinogens, as a



substance that may be reasonably anticipated to be a carcinogen.  This deter-



mination was in turn based on the International  Agency for Research on Cancer





                                       28

-------
                           DRAFT—DO  NOT QUOTE OR CITE





 (IARC)  finding  of  sufficient  evidence  for carcinogenicity in experimental



 animals.   The studies  underlying these determinations show a carcinogenic



 response  following skin  application  in mice and the production of local cancer



 in mice and  rats by  subcutaneous injection.



      Information concerning the pharmacokinetics of 1,3-butadiene is limited.



 Carpenter  et al. (1944)  determined that blood concentrations in the femoral



 artery and in the  femoral  vein of rabbits at nine minutes after exposure to an



 airborne concentration of  250,000 ppm were 0.26 mg/mL and 0.18 mg/mL, respec-



 tively.  Rats exposed  to 1,3-butadiene for 2 hours at an airborne concentration



 of 130,000 ppm  had the highest concentrations of the chemical in peri renal fat



 (152 mg%); lower concentrations (36-51 mg%) were found in the liver, brain,



 spleen, and kidney.  Ninety minutes after exposure to 130,000 ppm for one hour



 the tissue concentrations were minimal (Shugaev, 1969).



     Preliminary results from further investigations by NTP (personal communica-



 tion, 1S85) indicated that following intraperitoneal injection of radiolabeled



 1,3-butadiene,  male B6C3F1 mice exhale most of the dose unchanged.  Exhaled



 carbon dioxide  was the next largest pool  for the 14C label.   Lesser amounts



were detected in the urine and feces.  Little remained in the carcass 65 hours



 after intraperitoneal administration.  Nose-only exposure of male mice at con-



 centrations of  7.5, 97, 119, and 770 ppm for 6 hours did not alter the minute



 volume significantly.  Although pulmonary  absorption was lower than  expected



 (3-11%), it was linearly related to the inhaled  concentration.   The  urine was



the major route of excretion of the absorbed 1,3-butadiene.   The excretion of



the metabolized products is linearly related to  the inhaled  concentration.



4.2.   ANIMAL  STUDIES



4.2.1.   Chronic Toxicity Studies  in  Mice



     A chronic  toxicity and carcinogencity  inhalation  study  of  1,3-butadiene in





                                       29

-------
                           DRAFT—DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE





 B6C3F1 mice,  sponsored by  the  NTP, was conducted at Battelle Pacific Northwest



 Laboratories.   Preliminary inhalation toxicity studies in mice were used as a



 basis for dose  selection for a chronic study.  A 15-day study and a 14-week



 study were conducted at International Bio-Test Laboratories.  In the 15-day



 study, weight loss at airborne concentrations of 1,250 ppm was observed.  The



 mice exposed to 8,000 ppm, the highest airborne concentration, survived the



 exposure period.  In the 14-week study, reduced body weight and death were



 observed among mice treated at 2,500 ppm or more.  Necropsy findings were not



 reported (NTP,  1984).



     The mice used in the  chronic study were obtained from Charles River



 Laboratories and were exposed to graded concentrations of 625 and 1,250 ppm



 of 1,3-butadiene for 6 hours/day, 5 days/week.  The exposures were conducted in



 dynamic negative-pressure  exposure chambers, and the chamber concentrations



 were generated by mixing the test gas with filtered air.   The chamber concen-



 trations were measured 7 to 12 times a day for the first  150 days with a photo-



 ionization detector, and thereafter by gas chromatography.  It was intended



 that the dimer (4-vinyl-1-cyclohexene) concentration in the test material be-



 fore use should be controlled to less than 100 ppm.  However, three cylinders



 with slightly more than 100 ppm of dimer were used because replacements were



 not available.  The mice were 8 to 9 weeks of age when the exposures began, and



 were housed individually throughout the study.  There were 50 mice per sex per



 dose group.



     The mice were weighed weekly for the first  12 weeks  of the  study,  and



monthly thereafter.   They were  examined for subcutaneous  masses  beginning after



the 12th week.  Clinical  signs  were recorded weekly.   Histopathological  evalua-



tion (32 tissues)  was performed on all  mice.



     While the original  plan  was  for this to be  a 2-year  study,  all  surviving





                                       30

-------
                           DRAFT—DO NOT  QUOTE  OR  CITE





 mice were killed after week  60-61 because  of excessive  deaths among the treated



 mice.  Many of these deaths  were  caused  primarily  by the developing neoplasia.



 The survival  (mice at risk;  corrected  for  mice that were missing or were acci-



 dentally  killed) at this  early  termination was as  follows:





                          Airborne concentration (ppm)



                       0	625	1,250





  Males               49/49           11/50              7/46



  Females             46/46           14/47              30/48





      There  were  no increases  in clinical signs that could be associated with



 exposure  to 1,3-butadiene except  those related to tumor development and death.



 The body  weights were not affected  by  inhalation exposure to the test chemical.



      There  was a marked increase  in the  overall frequency of mice with primary



 tumors, as  indicated  below:





                          Airborne concentration (ppm)



                       0	625	1.250





 Males               10/50            44/50             40/50



 Females            6/50             40/50             46/49





      In addition to a marked increase in the number of animals with primary



 tumors, there was also an increase in the number  of animals  with multiple



 primary tumors.  Among the tumor-bearing male  mice, there were 11,  73, and  61



 such tumors in the control, low-,  and high-exposure groups,  respectively.   In



the females, there were 6, 66, and 100  tumors  in  the tumor-bearing  animals  of



the control, low-, and high-exposure groups,  respectively.



     The histopathologic evaluation indicated  significant  increases  in tumors





                                       31

-------
                           DRAFT—DO  NOT  QUOTE  OR  CITE





 of various types,  as shown in  Table  8.   These  tumors began to  appear  remark-



 ably early in the  course  of the  study.   Lymphomas were diagnosed  in mice dead



 at 22 and  20 weeks of exposure for males  and females, respectively, of the  high-



 exposure group.  The first tumors of this type were found in low-dose mice  at  24



 and 29 weeks, respectively.  Of  the  survivors, two males in the low-dose group



 and one in the high-dose  group had lymphomas.  In the females, one lymphoma



 was found  among  the  surviving  control mice, three in the low-dose group, and



 one in the high-dose group.  Many of the early deaths were judged to be caused



 by this type of  tumor.



      The heart was the principal  organ in which hemangiosarcomas occurred.  The



 first  hemangiosarcomas were  diagnosed at 32 and 42 weeks in the low- and high-



 dose males  and at  41  and  43  weeks among the females.  The cardiac hemangiosarco-



 mas may have caused  some  of  the mice to die early.  Atypical  cardiac endothelial



 hyperplasia,  a likely preneoplastic lesion, was not observed  among the controls



 but was. present  in treated males  (625 ppm - 10%,  1,250 ppm -  4%) and females



 (625 ppm -  10%,  1,250 ppm  -  16%).



     Alveolar/bronchiolar adenomas and carcinomas occurred (both separately and



 combined)  at  increased frequency  in both male and female mice.   In the high-dose



 groups  the  first such lesions  appeared at week  42 for males  and week  50 for



 females.   Neoplastic changes in the lungs of the  controls were  not detected



 until the termination of the study.   While neoplastic lesions  of the  nasal



 cavity were  not found at any dose,  there was an increase in  nonneoplastic



 changes at  the high dose.   At  1,250 ppm,  chronic  inflammation of the  nasal  cavity



 (male,  33/50; female, 2/49), fibrosis (male, 35/50;  female,  2/44), cartilaginous



metaplasia   (male, 16/50;  female 1/49),  osseous  metaplasia (male,  11/50;  female,



 2/49), and  atrophy  of the  sensory epithelium (male,  32/50) were observed.   No



 nonneoplastic lesions of the nasal  cavity were  found  in  the controls.   Huff et





                                       32

-------
                           DRAFT—DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE
      TABLE 8.  SUMMARY OF THE STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT INCIDENCE OF TUMORS
                 IN MICE EXPOSED FOR 60-61 WEEKS TO 1,3-BUTADIENE
Tumor type and site
Hemangiosarcomas
(heart)

Malignant lymphomas
(hematopoietic system)

Al veolar/bronchiolar
adenoma

adenoma/carci noma
»

Acinar cell carcinoma
(mammary)
Granulosa cell tumor
or carcinoma (ovary)
Forestomach
(All papilloma
and carcinoma)
Hepatocellular
adenoma
adenoma/carci noma
Sex
M
F
M
F
M
F
M
F
F
F
M
F
F
F
Airborne
0
0/50
p=0.032a
0/49
p=0.001a
0/50
p<0.001a
1/50
p<0.006a
2/50
p=0.10a
3/49
p<0.001a
2/50
p<0.001a
3/49
p<0.001a
0/50
p=0.007a
0/49
p<0.001a
0/49
p=0.354a
0/49
p<0.001a
0/50
p=0.025a
0/50
p=0.016a
concentration
625
16/49
p<0.001b
11/48
p<0.001b
23/50
p=0.001b
10/49
p=0.003b
12/49
p=0.003b
9/48
p=0.056b
14/49
p<0.001b
12/48
p=0.010b
2/49
p=0.242b
6/45
p=0.010b
7/40
p=0.037b
5/42
p=0.018b
1/47
p=0.485b
2/47
p=0.232b
(ppm)
1,250
7/49
p=0.006b
18/49
p<0.001b
29/50
p=0.001b
10/49
p=0.003b
11/49
p=0.007b
20/49
p<0.001b
15/49
p<0.001b
23/49
p<0.001b
6/49
p=0.012b
13/48
p<0.001b
1/44
p=0.473b
10/49
p<0.001b
4/49
p=0.056b
5/49
p=0.015b
aCochran-Armitage Trend Test.
bFisher Exact Test.
                                       33

-------
                          DRAFT—00 NOT QUOTE OR CITE

al.  (1985) have suggested that the lack of neoplasms in the nasal  cavity may
reflect a requirement for biotransformation of 1,3-butadiene to a  reactive
epoxide intermediate.
     Among the 10 control male mice with primary tumors, eight had hepatocell-
ular adenomas and/or carcinomas.  This type of tumor is normally observed among
male mice of this strain in 2-year bioassays.  It may be that the  inclusion of
mice with this type of tumor in considering the number of tumor-bearing animals
tends to deemphasize the frequency of compound-induced neoplasia.   On the other
hand, among the females, the frequency of hepatocellular adenomas  and/or carci-
nomas was increased.  The occurrence of this type of tumor among females of
this strain is more suggestive of adverse chemical-related effects.   Among the
male mice, there was a significant increase in liver necrosis at both doses.
In the female mice, liver necrosis was significantly elevated only at the
higher airborne concentration.
     In^addition to the neoplastic changes in the ovary and forestomach,
ovarian atrophy and forestomach epithelial hyperplasia were elevated  among
the mice at both doses.  Since Zymbal  gland tumors  have been reported in  the
chronic rat study to be discussed, it is worth noting that in this study, one
also occurred in high-dose female mice and two occurred in high-dose  male mice.
This tumor is not normally found in control  mice, even at the termination of a
2-year study.  Testicular atrophy was observed in male mice at  both dose  levels;
however, the increase in tumors of the testes that  had occurred in the  rats did
not occur in the mice.
     An audit of this chronic  study was conducted by the NTP.   Potential  dis-
crepancies that might have significantly influenced the interpretation  of this
study were resolved.  The NTP  considered that this  study provided  clear evi-
dence of carcinogenicity, which is the highest classification  in their  system

                                       34

-------
                          DRAFT—DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

of categorizing evidence of carcinogenicity.
4.2.2.  Chronic Toxic, ity Studies in Rats
     A 2-year chronic inhalation toxicity study using rats as the experimental
animals was conducted by Hazleton Laboratories Europe, Ltd. (HLE, 1981a) in
England.  The study was sponsored by the International Institute of Synthetic
Rubber Producers,  Inc.  The chronic study was preceded by a 3-month toxicity
study.  The airborne concentrations of 1,3-butadiene used in the 3-month study
were 1,000, 2,000, 4,000, and 8,000 ppm.  A control group was exposed to fil-
tered air.  No effects considered by the authors to be attributable to exposure
to the test chemical were seen in growth rate, food consumption, hematology,
blood biochemical  investigations, or pathological evaluation.  The only effect
the investigators  observed that might be related to 1,3-butadiene exposure was
a moderate increase in salivation, particularly in female rats during the last
6 to 8 weeks of exposure at the higher airborne concentrations (Crouch et al.,
1979)..
     For the chronic investigation (HLE, 1981a), Charles River CD rats (Sprague-
Dawley rats obtained from Charles River Ltd.) were exposed to graded concen-
trations of 1,000  and 8,000 ppm of 1,3-butadiene.  The exposures (6 hours/day,
5 days/week) for 111 and 105 weeks for males and females, respectively, were
conducted in a dynamic negative-pressure exposure chamber.  The chamber concen-
trations were generated by mixing the test gas with filtered air.  The concen-
centrations were measured with an infrared gas analyzer.   The dimer (4-vinyl-
1-cyclohexene) concentrations in the test material  before use were less than
1,000 ppm, but samples in the 700 to 800 ppm range were used, and the dimer
concentration of these averaged 413 ppm.  The rats were 4 1/2 weeks of age
when the exposures began, and were housed five to a cage throughout the study.
There were 110 rats per sex per dose group,  and a similar number of rats  exposed
                                       35

-------
                          DRAFT—DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE





to filtered air served as a control group.



     The rats were weighed weekly and examined for subcutaneous masses and



other clinical signs.  Blood chemistries, hemograms, and urine analyses were



evaluated at 3, 6, and 12 months.  Neuromuscular function was evaluated period-



ically through week 77 of the study.  Ten rats per sex per dose were killed and



necropsied at week 52.  Histopathological evaluations were performed on all rats



from the high-dose group and the control group.  Tissues from the low-dose



group that were deemed to be of toxicological significance were also examined.



     Variations in mean body weight suggested no consistent adverse effect.



Review of the hemograms, blood chemistry, urine analysis, and behavioral  testing



was likewise not indicative of an adverse effect.



     The clinical  signs in the high-dose group, consisting of excessive secre-



tion of the eyes and nose plus a slight ataxia, were observed between months 2



and 5.  In addition, in the females of the treated groups subcutaneous masses



appeared earlier and at a higher incidence than in the control  group.  A dose-



related increase in liver weights was observed at the necropsy  performed at 52



weeks and at the termination of the study.  This could indicate that the chemi-



cal induces liver enzymes.  Otherwise, no significant changes were  noted at the



52-week kill.



     In the control group, 45% of the males and 46% of the females  survived until



the end of the study (note:  corrected for interim kill).   In the high-dose group,



survival  was 32% and 24%, while in the low-dose group 50% and 32% survived.



The decreased survival  in the high-dose group was statistically significant.



     Increased alveolar metaplasia and nephropathy were observed among males of



the 8,000-ppm treatment groups at the termination of the  study.  Marked or se-



vere nephropathy occurred in 27% of the male rats in the  high-dose  group,  as



compared with 9 to 10% in the control  and the low-dose groups.   The authors con-
                                       36

-------
                           DRAFT—DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

 sidered nephropathy to be the cause of some of the early deaths  in  this  study.
 The frequency of metaplasia was 5/44 in the surviving male rats  (8,000  ppm)  as
 compared to 5/45 in the controls.
      With regard to the carcinogenic potential  of 1,3-butadiene,  the  authors
 of this study concluded that exposure of male and female rats  under the
 conditions of this investigation was associated with  significant  increases in
 both common and uncommon tumors.  Furthermore,  they stated that the results  of
 this 2-year inhalation study supported the  premise that  1,3-butadiene is a
 suspect weak oncogen.
      The incidence of  selected  neoplasms  is  shown  in  Table 9.  In the females
 there was an increase  in mammary carcinoma  tumors  (control  - 8%,  1,000 ppm - 42%,
 8,000 ppm - 38%).   Also,  in the females  follicular thyroid adenomas were encoun-
 tered more frequently  among the treated  females  than  among the controls  (control
 -  0%, 1,000 ppm -  2%,  8,000 ppm -  8%).   An  increase in uterine/vaginal tumors
 (control  - 0%,  1,000 ppm -  2%,  8,000 ppm  - 8%) was also  observed in the females.
 One  female of the  8,000  - ppm exposure group  had an uterine stromal  tumor
 (unspecified).
      In  the  males  there was  an  increase in Leydig  cell adenomas (control - 0%,
 1,000 ppm -  2%,  8,000  ppm -  7%).  A  single Leydig  cell tumor (unspecified) was
 observed  in  one  male of each exposed  group.  Exocrine pancreatic  adenomas were
 increased  in the male  rats  of the high-dose group  (control - 3%,  1,000 ppm -  1%,
 8,000  ppm  -  10%).  One carcinoma was  observed in this  tissue in the  males of  the
 high-dose  group.
     Zymbal  gland tumors were increased in the high-dose group, when male and
 female rats were combined.  Except for these, the increase in  tumors in  this
 investigation was limited to tumors that developed in  hormonal-dependent
tissues.
                                       37

-------
                          ORAFT--DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE
              TABLE 9.  SUMMARY OF THE INCIDENCE OF TUMORS IN RATS
          EXPOSED TO 1,3-BUTADIENE (100 RATS PER SEX PER DOSE GROUP)
Tumor type and site
Multiple mammary
gland tumors
Thyroid follicular
(adenoma and carcinoma)
Uterine cervical/
stromal sarcoma
Leydig cell
(adenoma and carcinoma)
Pancreatic exocrine
Carcinoma
Adenoma
Zymbal 3} and
(carcinoma)

Sex
F
F
F
M

M
M
M
F
Airborne
0
50
p<0.001a
0
p<0.001a
1
p=0.115a
0
p<0.003a

0
3
p=0.019a
0
p=0.384a
0
p=0.037a
concentration
1,000
79
p<0.001b
4
p=0.06b
4
p=0.184b
3
p=0.12b

0
1
p=0.879b
1
p=0.5b
0
(ppm)
8,000
84
p<0.001b
11
p<0.001b
5
p=0.106b
8
p<0.001b

1
10
p=0.041b
1
p=0.5b
4
p=0.061b
aCochran-Armitage Trend Test.
bFisher Exact Test.
                                       38

-------
                           DRAFT—DO  NOT QUOTE OR CITE





 4.2.3.   Summary  of  Chronic Toxicity  Studies



      The two chronic  studies available at this time are compared in Table 10.



 The  obvious difference  is  the marked sensitivity of the mice compared to the



 rats  with  regard to carcinogenic response.  Some difference in this direction



 might be expected.  For example, if the carcinogenic response is elicited by a



 metabolite, as has  been suggested  (de Meester et al., 1978, 1980), mice, because



 of their higher  rate  of metabolism, might be expected to yield a greater response



 than  rats.  The  variation  in housing during exposure (individually in the case



 of the mice versus  in groups in the case of the rats), and the higher dimer



 content of the material to which the rats were exposed, might also be expected



 to contribute to the  difference in the sensitivity of the mice.  Among the



 other factors that might have led to this rather remarkable species differences



 are intralaboratory variations in dimer formation in the test atmospheres and



 variations in metabolite formation.



     Tlie tumors  in the rats are largely characterized as occurring in hormonal -



 dependent tissues.  Some suggestion of this is observed in the mice, but not to



 so great an extent.   The occurrence of a similar array of tumors in the mice



 could have been prevented by the early deaths from more rapidly developing neo-



 plasia.  It is worth noting the Zymbal  gland tumors did develop in both species,



 but were not as marked in the mice.



     In the NTP mouse study,  hemangiosarcomas of the  heart, a very rare tumor,



were markedly elevated in both groups exposed to 1,3-butadiene.   The possible



cardiac selectivity of 1,3-butadiene is further  suggested by the presence of



cardiac disease in two of the epidemiologic studies,  as well  as  the occurrence



of cardiac anomalies in the teratogenic investigations.



4.3.   EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDIES



     The manufacture of styrene-butadiene  rubber (SBR)  involves  the use of,  and





                                       39

-------
TABLE 10.
SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS OF EXPOSURE TO 1,3-BUTADIENt ON SPRAliUb-DAWLEY RATS
           AND B6C3F1 MICE IN INHALATION STUDIES
                  	Rats8 (Hazleton Laboratories Europe, Ltd., 1981a)

                  1,000 ppm                         8,000 ppm
Neoplasms:
Male
Female
       Leydig cell adenoma''
       Mammary gland:
        fibroadenoma/carci nomab
       Thyroid: follicular cell
        adenomab
       Uterus: stromal sarcomab
Nonneoplastic lesions:
Males
  Leydig cell adenomab
  Pancreas: exocrine tumors'3
  Brain: glioma

  Mammary gland:fibroadenoma/
                   carcinoma"
  Thyroid:follicular cell
                   adenomab
  Uterus: stromal sarcomab
  Zymbal gland: carcinomab

  Increased focal alveolar
   epithelialization
  Nephropathy
                        Hicec (National Toxicology Program, 1984)
                  625 ppm
                                         1,250 ppm
Neoplasms:
Males
Females
       Heart: hemangiosarcomab
       Malignant lymphomab
       Lung: alveolar/bronchiolar
        adenoma and carcinoma*3
       Forestomach: papillomab
       Preputial gland:
        squamous cell carcinomad
       Brain: glioma''

       Heart: hemangiosarcomab
       Malignant lymphomab
       Lung: alveolar/bronchiolar
        adenoma and carcinoma*5
       Forestomach: papillomab
       Ovary: granulosa cell
        tumorb
Nonneoplastic lesions:
Male              Forestomach: epithelial
                   hyperplasia*3
                  Liver necrosis'5
                  Testicular atrophyb
Female
       Liver necrosis'3
       Forestomach: epithelial
        hyperplasiab
       Ovary, atrophyb
       Uterus: involution13
 Heart: hemangiosarcomab
 Malignant lymphomab
 Lung: alveolar/bronchiolar
  adenoma and carcinoma*3
 Preputial gland:
  squamous cell carcinoma''
 Zymbal gland: carcinomad
 Brain: gliomad

Heart: hemangiosarcomab
Malignant lymphoma*3
Lung: alveolar/bronchiolar
 adenoma and carcinoma*3
Forestomach: papilloma*3
Mammary gland: acinar cell
 carcinoma*3
Ovary granulosa cell tumorb
Liver: hepatocellular adenoma
 or carcinoma (combined)*3
 Forestomach: epithelial
  hyperplasia*3
 Liver necrosis'3
 Nasal cavity lesions (chronic
  inflammation, fibrosis, car-
  tilaginous metaplasia, osse-
  ous metaplasia, atrophy of
  sensory epithelium*3
 Testicular atrophy*3

 Forestomach: epithelial
  hyperplasiab
 Ovary: atrophy*3
 Uterus: involution*3
aGroups of 100 male and female Sprague-Dawley rats were exposed to air contain-
 ing 0, 1,000 or 8,000 ppm 1,3-butadiene 6 hours/day, 5 days/week for
 105 weeks (female), or 111 weeks (male); survival in dosed groups decreased.
bStatistically significant (p < 0.05)
cGroups of 50 male and female B6C3F1 mice were exposed to air containing 0, 625
 or 1,250 ppm 1,3-butadiene 6 hour/day, 5 days/week for 60 week (male) or 61
 weeks (female); survival in dosed groups decreased and was the reason for early
 termination.
^Considered uncommon at 60 weeks.

SOURCE:  National Toxicology Program, 1984.
                                         40

-------
                          DRAFT—DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE



hence exposures to, several different chemicals.  The two major components of

SBR polymers are styrene and butadiene.  In a typical recipe for the production

of SBR, butadiene and styrene account for 26% and 9%, respectively, of the

total ingredients.  It should be pointed out that water accounts for 63% of the

volume.  At room temperature styrene is a clear, colorless liquid, while buta-


diene is a gas.

     Two other agents, toluene and benzene, need to be considered, although they

are not used directly in the manufacture of SBR.  Toluene exposures result from

its periodic use as a tank-cleaning agent; it may also exist as an impurity of

styrene.  Benzene exposures may occur as an impurity of styrene or toluene.
                                                                       j
     Occupational epidemiologic studies investigating the potential health ha-

zards associated with the production of synthetic rubber have been very limited

in number.  Because styrene and butadiene are the two basic materials used in

the manufacture of SBR, with benzene and toluene as byproducts, it is at best

difficult to assess the singular contribution of each.  Benzene exposure has

been identified with excessive risk, particularly acute leukemia (Linet, 1985).

Styrene also may be a leukemogen in humans (Ott et al., 1980; Lilis and Nichol-

son, 1976).  Although many studies of rubber production workers have been con-

ducted, only a few of those studies are relevant to butadiene exposure.  Those

studies, which are reviewed here, include studies of workers specifically iden-

tified as working in styrene-butadiene production or the manufacture of synthe-

tic rubber.  A study was also included if it was a preliminary study to one in

which the workers were identified as SBR or synthetic rubber workers, or if it

added to the interpretation of one of the studies of SBR or synthetic rubber

workers.


4.3.1.  McHichael et al. (1974,  1976)

     In 1974,  McMichael  et al.  identified,  through company  records, a historic



                                       41

-------
                           DRAFT—DO  NOT QUOTE OR CITE





 prospective  cohort  of  6,678  hourly paid male workers in a  rubber tire manufac-



 turing  plant  in  Akron,  Ohio.   The cohort was composed of all active and retired



 male employees aged  40  to  84 years as of January 1, 1964.



     During the  9-year  follow-up period from 1964 through  1972, 1,783 workers



 died.   Death  certificates  were obtained for 99.5% of these workers, and the



 causes  of death  were coded according to the 8th revision of the International



 Classification of Diseases (ICD), by a National  Center for Health Statistics



 nosologist.



     SMRs were calculated  for all males using the 1968 U.S. male population as



 a standard population.  SMRs for all  causes for the active age range of 40-64



 and the full age range  of  40-84 were 93 and 99,  respectively.  In cause-speci-



 fic SMRs, statistically significant excesses were observed for stomach cancer



 (SMR =  219, observed =  12, expected = 5.5, p < 0.01),  lymphosarcoma (SMR = 251,



 observed = 6, expected  = 2.4, p < 0.05), and leukemia  (SMR = 315, observed =



 11, expected = 3.5, p < 0.001), in  the active age range of 40-64.  For the full



 age range of 40-84, significant SMR increases were  observed for cancers of the



 stomach (SMR = 187, observed = 39,  expected = 20.9,  p  < 0.001), prostate,  (SMR



 = 142, observed = 49, expected = 34.4, p < 0.05), lymphosarcoma (SMR = 226,



 observed = 14, expected = 6.2, p <  0.01),  diabetes  mellitus (SMR =  143, observed



 = 43, expected = 30, p < 0.05), and arteriosclerosis (SMR  = 154,  observed  =



 34, expected = 22.1, p < 0.05).



     McMichael et al. (1976)  attempted to  evaluate  the  relationship  of these



mortality excesses to specific jobs within this  plant  by designing  a nested



case-control  study.   Out of a total  of 1,983 deaths  observed  during  the 10-year



follow-up period of 1964 through 1973, 455 individuals  who  had  died  from certain



specific causes were selected as cases.   The specific causes  of death  included



stomach, colorectal, respiratory, prostate, and  bladder cancers;  cancers of the





                                       42

-------
                          DRAFT—DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

lymphatic and hematopoietic systems; lymphatic leukemias; ischemic heart dis-
ease; and diabetes mellitus.  Out of these 455 cases, 353 deaths were attri-
buted to cancers and 102 to noncancer causes.  From the remainder of the plant
population of male workers, an age-stratified random sample of 1,500 individuals,
with 500 individuals in each age group of 40-54, 55-64 and 65-84 was obtained.
Complete work histories were obtained for 99% (1,482) of this age-stratified
sample drawn as a control group.
     As of January 1, 1964, the plant population of male workers had a racial
composition of 86% white and 14% black.  Thirty-eight percent, 30%, and 32% were
in the 40-54, 55-64, and 65-84 age ranges, respectively.  Forty-eight percent
had begun work in the plant at least 25 years prior to 1964, and 99% had worked
for at least 10 years by 1964.
     Work exposure histories were restricted to the period from 1940 through
1960.  Cumulative job exposures of less than 2 years were excluded from the
analyses.  Because follow-up extended to 1972, the period between first exposure
and death could range from 12 to 32 years, which should allow for the observation
of occupationally induced cancers in adults.
     For each of the cause-specific mortality groups, as well  as the group of
controls, rates of exposure for minimum duration of 2 years and 5 years were
calculated for each of 16 occupational  title groups (OTGs) in  order to ascer-
tain any dose-response relationships.  The exposure rates in each case group
were age-adjusted by the direct method  of adjustment to the age distribution of
the controls.  For the nine cause-specific mortality groups, the ratios of
their age-adjusted job classification exposure rates to the rates within the
sample of controls were calculated in order to provide an approximation for
the more conventional  odds ratios.
     For all  of the causes of death under investigation,  there were statisti-

                                       43

-------
                          DRAFT—DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

cally significant (p < 0.001) associations with many of the work areas in which
workers had had at least 5 years of exposure.  In the synthetic plant area, the
significant (p < 0.001) risk ratios were 6.2 for lymphatic and hematopoietic
cancer, 3.9 for lymphatic leukemia, 3.0 for ischemic heart disease, and 2.2 for
stomach cancer.  Among the various work areas, the risk ratios for lymphatic
leukemia and for lymphatic and hematopoietic cancer were the highest in the
synthetic plant.  Spirtas (1976) reported, however, that the risk ratio for
lymphatic and hematopoietic cancer dropped from 6.2 to 2.4 when a smaller
matched control group was used; the statistical significance of the 2.4 risk
ratio was not indicated.
     McMichael  et al. (1976) reported that a case-control  study (McMichael  et
al., 1975) had found an association between lymphatic leukemia and solvent  expo-
sure in the rubber industry.  Many of the lymphatic leukemia deaths were the
same as those reported in the McMichael  et al. (1976) study.  Further analysis
by Checkoway et al.  (1984) of 11 of the lymphatic leukemia cases studied by Mc-
Michael et al.  also found an association between lymphatic leukemia and solvent
exposure.  Spirtas (1976) reported that of the six deaths  from neoplasms of
lymphatic and hematopoietic tissue of individuals who had  worked in the synthetic
rubber area of the plant in the McMichael  et al.  (1976)  study,  three were due
to leukemia.  Of these three individuals,  two had had experience with solvents
other than in the synthetic plant.  Thus the role of the transfer of individuals
from one work area into another needs to be investigated.   Also, racial  factors
could not be accounted for in exposure calculations because data on race were
not available for much of the study population at the time of sampling.
4.3.2.  Andjelkovich  et al. (1976, 1977)
     The mortality experience during the period from January 1,  1964 through
December 31, 1973 of  a historic prospective cohort of 8,938 male rubber workers

                                       44

-------
                           DRAFT—DO  NOT  QUOTE  OR  CITE





 (known  as  the  "1964  cohort")  from  a  single  plant  located  in  Akron,  Ohio, was



 observed by  Andjelkovich  et al.  in 1976.  Any  person who  was  40 years  of age



 or  more on January 1,  1964, and  was  an active  or  living retired hourly worker



 from  the plant  under study, was  included  in the 1964 cohort.



      Data  were  collected  from company records, life insurance death claims,



 and bureaus  of  vital statistics  of several  states.  A trained nosologist coded



 the causes of death  according to the 8th  revision of the  ICD.  Follow-up was



 achieved for 96.7% of  the  cohort.  Out of 8,938 males, 94% (8,418) were white



 males and  were  equally distributed in the age  groups 40-54,  55-64, and 65-84.



 Although 6%  of  the cohort  consisted of black males, the major analyses were



 done  on white males.   During  the 10-year observation period  2,373 (28%) of the



 white males  died.  SMRs were  calculated using the age-, race-, and sex-specific



 rates of the 1968 U.S. population.  SMRs for deaths from  all  causes in the



 40-64,  65-84, and 40-84 age groups were, respectively, 92 (observed =  619), 95



 (observed  =  1,754, p < 0.05)  and 94, (observed = 2,373, p < 0.01).



     Many  cause-specific SMRs showed increases, but only two disease SMRs,



 those for  neoplasms  of lymphatic and hematopoietic tissue (SMR = 138, observed



 = 40) and  chronic rheumatic heart  disease (SMR = 170,  observed = 16) for the



 age group  65-84 were statistically significant (p  < 0.05).  The only statisti-



 cally significant (p < 0.05)  SMR for the age group 40-64 was  for cerebrovascular



 disease (SMR =  138, observed  = 48).  On  further detailed examination of neoplasms



 of lymphatic and hematopoietic tissue,  statistically significant  excesses were



 found for monocytic leukemia  (SMR = 441,  observed  = 3,  p < 0.01)  and other



 neoplasms  of lymphatic  and hematopoietic  tissue (SMR =  276,  observed = 10,  p <



0.001) in  the age group 65-84.  There were no  deaths by either of  these causes



in the age  group 40-64.



     An  important finding  of this study  is that it found  a high mortality rate





                                      45

-------
                          DRAFT—DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE





in workers who had retired between the ages of 40 and 64, the mandatory retire-



ment age being 65.  The SMR for all causes for this group was 202, which is



highly statistically significant (observed = 299, p < 0.001).  The SMR for



almost every cause analyzed was elevated, and out of 26 categories, 13 of them



were statistically significant.  For malignant diseases, the authors found



significant elevations in SMRs for malignant neoplasms of the prostate (SMR =



278, observed = 4, p < 0.05); large intestine (SMR = 231, observed = 6, p <



0.05); trachea, bronchus, and lung (SMR = 241, observed = 28, p < 0.001); and



brain and central nervous system (SMR = 323, observed = 3, p < 0.05).   In



non-malignant diseases, SMRs were statistically significant for 1) benign neo-



plasms and neoplasms of unspecified nature (SMR = 541, observed = 2, p < 0.01);



2) endocrine, nutritional, and metabolic diseases (SMR = 396, observed = 11,



p < 0.001); 3) diseases of the nervous system and sense organs (SMR =  577,



observed = 6, p < 0.001); 4) chronic rheumatic heart disease (SMR = 440, ob-



served^ 7, p < 0.001); 5) ischemic heart disease (SMR = 180, observed = 112,



p < 0.001); 6) cerebrovascular disease (SMR = 258, observed = 22, p <  0.001);



7) other respiratory disease (SMR = 309, observed = 5, p < 0.01); 8) diseases



of the digestive system (SMR = 357, observed = 16, p < 0.01); and 9) symptoms



and ill-defined conditions (SMR = 263, observed = 4, p < 0.05).



     As opposed to these increases, the SMR for deaths from all causes for ac-



tive workers in the 40-64 age group was 61 (observed = 320), substantially



lower than the SMR of 202 for retired workers in this age group.   The  overall



SMR for active and retired workers combined was 92 (observed = 619), showing a



dilution effect by the active workers and confirming the "healthy worker"



effect.  Some cause-specific SMRs were elevated slightly in this  active group,



but none of them were statistically significant.



     In an attempt to evaluate the relationship between the mortality  increases





                                       46

-------
                          DRAFT—DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE



and occupational exposures, Andjelkovich et al.  (1977)  re-analyzed  the  same


data for 28 work areas within the plant under study  in  1977.   The Occupational


Title Group (OTG) of each person was decided on  the  basis  of  the most  represen-


tative department (obtained from personnel  folders)  in  which  the individual  had


worked.  The closing date for the active workers was December 31, 1973,  while


for the retired or terminated workers the period of  study  was from  the  date  of


hire to the last date worked.


     All causes of death and cause-specific SMRs were calculated by using  the


experience of the entire cohort as a reference group.  Marginal increases  in


SMRs for all causes were observed for many  OTGs  for  all  three of the age groups


considered:  40-64, 65-84, and 40-84 years.  The only statistically significant


excess observed was for cast film manufacture (SMR = 230,  observed  = 7,  p  <


0.05) in age group 65-84.  Statistically significant (p <  0.05) SMR deficits


from all causes were observed for OTGs:  1) product  fabrication  (tire and  beads),


2) product fabrication (valves, tubes, and  flaps), and  3)  bulk chemicals and
      *

metal products, for at least one or more of the  three age  groups.


     SMR increases were statistically significant for all  neoplasms in  the fol-


lowing four OTGs:  1) cast film manufacture for  age  group  40-84, 2) special


products manufacture for age group 40-84, 3) milling for age  groups 65-84  and


40-84, and 4) miscellaneous for age groups  40-64 and 40-84.   Out of these  four


OTGs, the first three departments dealt with the manufacture  of industrial


products.


     For selected cancers, the SMRs were significantly  (p  < 0.05) elevated in


age group 40-84 in certain OTGs, namely, cancer  of the  stomach in compounding


and mixing (SMR = 479, observed = 3), and milling (SMR  = 369, observed  = 6);


cancer of the large intestine in special products (SMR  = 629, observed  = 4);


cancers of the trachea, bronchus, and lung  in synthetic latex (SMR  = 434,



                                       47

-------
                          DRAFT—DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE





observed = 3); cancer of the prostate (SMR = 212, observed = 10);  and leukemia



(SMR = 246, observed = 6) in general  services.  All  SMRs,  except the  one  for



the compounding and mixing department, showed statistically significant excesses



of deaths in more than one age group.



     For non-malignant diseases, Andjelkovich et al.  (1977) calculated signifi-



cantly (p < 0.05) elevated SMRs for diabetes mellitus,  acute myocardial infarc-



tion, arteriosclerosis, and suicide in various OTGs  for various age  groups.



Significant excesses of deaths in the general service department and  arterio-



sclerosis in the shipping and receiving department were observed in more  than



one age group.  Statistically significant deficits were observed for  ischemic



heart disease in the industrial chemicals department  and acute myocardial



infarction in the stock preparation department, both  in the 40-84  age group.



     Since the authors were aware that the job transfer patterns of the deceased



workers were not necessarily representative of the job  transfer patterns  of  the



entire-cohort, they used the available information on deceased workers to esti-



mate the length of time spent in the most representative department.   A simple



random sample of 50 deceased workers was chosen, and  detailed work histories



were reviewed for them.  The 50 workers had spent an  average of 28.3  years in



the industry.  On an average, each worker had spent  50% of his work time  in



his most representative OTG.  However, the fraction  of  time spent  in  the  most



representative OTG ranged from less than 10% up to 100% of total employment



duration.



     The Andjelkovich et al. studies have a number of limitations.  First,



their use of the most representative departments should be questioned in  view



of the fact that the people under study could have worked  in these departments



from 10% to 100% of their total employment duration.   The  only elevated SMR  in



synthetic latex was for cancer of the trachea, bronchus, and lung, based  on  only





                                       48

-------
                          DRAFT—DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE





three deaths, while cigarette smoking, which is a potential confounder, was not



controlled for.  Another limitation with regard to the observed elevation of



trachea, bronchus, and lung cancer was the use of 1968 mortality data to calcu-



late the expected number of deaths.  Mortality for trachea, bronchus, and lung



cancer was rising sharply during the period 1964 to 1983, the follow-up period



of this study.  The use of 1968 data may have underestimated the expected num-



ber of deaths and thus overestimated the SMR.  Although a statistically signi-



ficant excess of deaths for cancers of lymphatic and hematopoietic tissue was



observed for persons whose most representative department was general services,



this job category does not necessarily involve contact with SBR production.



With regard to the questionable exposure, Taulbee et al. (1976) reported that



in an analysis of the work histories of 37 leukemia cases and four matched



controls per case from the 1964 cohort of Andjelkovich et al., none of the



cases were found to have worked in the OTG "synthetic plant."  Some of the



cases Had worked in departments in which there may have been exposure to the



synthetic process, but this association was not statistically significant



(p < 0.05), nor was the association found to increase by duration of exposure.



     One positive aspect of the Andjelkovich et al. (1977)  study is that the



entire cohort is used as a reference group, which should reduce the "healthy



worker effect" and allow for a more unbiased evaluation.  It would have been



interesting, however, to see the comparison of SMRs calculated from the U.S.



population (1968), which was used as a standard population  in the 1976 study,



with the SMRs calculated from the internal  cohort as a reference group.



     Both the McMichael  et al. and the Andjelkovich et al.  studies are sugges-



tive of some health problems in the synthetic plant, indicating that specific



exposure investigations  should be undertaken.
                                       49

-------
                          DRAFT--DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE





4.3.3.  Checkoway and Williams (1982)



     Since the study «;,  McMichael et al. (1976) indicated the potential pre-



sence of carcinogens in SBR plants, Checkoway and Williams conducted a combined



industrial hygiene and hematology cross-sectional survey at the same plant



studied by McMichael et al.  The objectives of the Checkoway and Williams study



were to quantify workplace exposures to styrene, butadiene, benzene, and toluene,



and to relate exposure levels to hematologic measurements.



     During the week of May 15-19, 1979, personal breathing-zone air samples



were collected with both a charcoal tube and a passive diffusion dosimeter



during the day and evening shifts for seven different departments.   The depart-



ments were:  1) tank farm, 2) reactor and recovery, 3) latex blending and



solution, 4) shipping and receiving, 5) storeroom, 6) factory service, and 7)



maintenance areas.  Sampling periods ranged from 4 to 6 hours.   Charcoal tubes



were changed at intervals of 1 to 2 hours during the sampling period to avoid



overloading.



     Blood samples of male hourly production workers for the same departments



were obtained on 4 separate days, May 15-18.  Of the 163 workers (26-65 years



of age with a median age of 45 years; 144 whites and 19 blacks) who participa-



ted in the industrial hygiene survey, 154 (135 whites and 19 blacks) also par-



ticipated in the blood survey.  Because of work scheduling demands, blood



samples were collected from participants from each of the departments on all 4



days, thereby minimizing any bias due to day effect.  The hematological parame-



ters measured included red cell  count (RBC), hemoglobin concentration, hemato-



crit, mean corpuscular volume (MCV), mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration,



reticulocyte count, platelets, total leukocytes (WBC), and differential distri-



butions of neutrophils,  neutrophil  band forms, eosinophils, basophils, monocytes,



and lymphocytes.   Medical  histories were obtained by means of questionnaires.





                                       50

-------
                          DRAFT—DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE





Data from persons who reported positive histories of either malignant disease,



radiation therapy, or current anemia of known etiology were excluded from the



analyses.  Only one individual, who reported a history of leukemia, was excluded



from the study.



     The mean 8-hour time-weighted averages and ranges show that all four che-



mical exposures were well below the American Conference of Governmental Indus-



trial Hygienists (ACGIH) Threshold Limit Values (TLVs) recommended at that



time.  The TLVs in parts per million (ppm) for butadiene, styrene, benzene, and



toluene are 1,000, 100, 10, and 100, respectively.  With the exception of



butadiene and styrene, for which time-weighted averages of 20.03 ppm and 13.67



ppm, respectively, were observed in the tank farm area, the mean levels for the



four chemicals in all other departments were less than 2 ppm.  Even the maximum



concentration of benzene, the most strongly suspected leukemogen of the four



chemicals analyzed, was less than 1 ppm in all plant departments.



     Wi_th regard to the hematologic survey, there were generally no associations



(p > 0.05) of hematologic values with chemical exposures.  Red blood cell  count



was negatively associated with butadiene and styrene exposure, while basophiI



count was positively related to the aforementioned chemicals, as measured by



Pearson product moment analysis.  The negative association of styrene with



erythrocyte counts and the positive association of the basophil  proportions



with butadiene persisted after controlling for age and medical status in step-



wise multiple linear regression analyses.   However, there were curious opposing



findings for mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration—a positive relationship



to butadiene and a negative association with styrene.



     Mean hematologic mesurements adjusted for age and medical status were com-



pared for tank farm area workers and all other workers.  The tank farm workers



had slightly lower levels of circulating erythrocytes, hemoglobin, platelets,





                                       51

-------
                          DRAFT—DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE





and neutrophils, in addition to mean corpuscular red cell  volumes  and neutro-



phil band circuits that were slightly higher than those of the other workers.



     This study was undertaken to quantify exposure levels and to  find out if



there is any evidence of hematopoietic toxicity in relation to these exposure



levels.  With the exception of the tank farm area, the average exposures to the



four chemicals assayed were uniformly less than 2 ppm; even in the tank farm



area, the styrene and butadiene concentrations were considerably lower than the



recommended ACGIH TLVs, although they were considerably higher than in other



work places studied.



     Because this study is cross-sectional in design,  it is very limited with



regard to determining whether styrene-butadiene exposure is carcinogenic.



Individuals in the plant who may have developed cancer probably left the work



force and hence were not available for blood sampling.  The industrial hygiene



survey findings cannot be generalized to the past, since the concentrations may



have differed quantitatively as well as qualitatively.  It can be  concluded



that there was no pronounced evidence of hematologic abnormality in this study



population.



4.3.4.  Meinhardt et al. (1982)



     Meinhardt et al. (1982) reported on a retrospective cohort mortality study



conducted by NIOSH at two adjacent SBR facilities in eastern Texas.  This study



was motivated by the report of two men who had worked  at both plants, and who



had died of leukemia in January 1976.



     Personnel employment records documenting the employment of 3,494 workers



from plant A and 2,015 from plant B were available since January 1943 and



January 1950, respectively, to the study cut-off date  of March 31, 1976.  The



study cohorts from plants A and B consisted of 1,662 and 1,094 white males who



had had at least 6 months of non-management and non-administrative employment,





                                       52

-------
                          DRAFT—DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE





 respectively.  The average  lengths of employment for the study cohort in plants



 A and B were, respectively, 9.48 and 10.78 years.



     At the time of the study, environmental samples were obtained at each



 plant.  At plant A, time-weighted average exposures of styrene, butadiene, and



 benzene were 0.94 ppm  (0.03-6.46), 1.24 ppm (0.11-4.17) and 0.10 ppm (0.08-0.14)



 respectively.  For plant B, time-weighted average exposures for styrene and



 butadiene were 1.99 ppm (0.05-12.3) and 13.5 ppm (0.34-174.0), respectively



 (benzene was not measured).  No historical monitoring data were available for



 either plant.



     The study cohorts from plants A and B accounted for 34,187 and 19,742



 person-years at risk of dying.  It is also important to note that the survival



 status of 54 individuals (3.25%) from cohort A and 34 individuals (3.11%)



 from cohort B was unable to be determined.  In subsequent analyses, these



 individuals were considered to be alive.



     Thje age, race, sex, calendar time, and cause-specific mortality rates of



 the U.S. population were applied to the appropriate strata of person-years at



 risk in order to obtain the expected number of cause-specific deaths in the



 study populations.  Differences in observed and expected numbers of deaths were



 evaluated by a test statistic based on the Poisson distribution.



     In cohorts from plants A and B, observed and expected numbers of deaths



 were compared for the following cause-specific categories:   tuberculosis;



 malignant neoplams (including cancers of the lymphatic and hematopoietic tis-



 sues); all  other cancers;  diseases of the nervous, circulatory, respiratory,



 and digestive systems; accidents; and all  other causes.   With the exception of



mortalities from cancers of the lymphatic and hematopoietic tissues, there were



deficits (in some instances, striking deficits) in the cause-specific SMRs for



the study cohorts in both  the plants.




                                       53

-------
                          DRAFT--DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE





     With reyard to the total number of deaths due to all  causes, cohorts A and



B had observed numbers of deaths of 252 (SMR = 80) and 80  (SMR = 66), respec-



tively.  Although it is possible that the "healthy worker" effect may, in part,



explain these deficits, the relative magnitudes of the deficits, particularly



for plant B, suggest that there may have been an underreporting of deaths or that



selection factors in the choice of the study groups reduced the mortality rate.



     Meinhardt et al. observed that all  five of the individuals from plant A



whose underlying cause of death was leukemia began employment  before the end of



December 1945.  This date corresponds to the time when the batch process for



SBR production was converted to a continuous-feed operation.   The decision was



made, therefore, to evaluate the mortality experience of those 600 white male



employees who had had at least 6 months  of employment in plant A between Janu-



ary 1, 1943 and December 31, 1945.  This subgroup was employed for an average



of 11.9 years, and had an accumulation of 17,086 person-years  at risk of dying.



The survival status of 34 individuals (5.7%) was unknown.   As  in the previous



mortality analyses, with the exception of deaths from cancers  of the lymphatic



and hematopoietic tissues, there generally were large deficits in the cause-



specific observed number of deaths.  For malignant neoplasms of lymphatic and



hematopoietic tissues, the SMR was 212 (9 observed, 4.25 expected, 0.05 < p



< 0.1); for lymphosarcoma and reticulosarcoma the SMR was  224  (3 cases, 1.34



expected, p > 0.05); for Hodgkin's disease the SMR was 213 (1  case,  0.47 ex-



pected, p > 0.05); and for leukemia and  aleukemia the SMR  was  278 (5 cases,



1.80 expected, 0.05 < p < 0.1).  The total number of observed  deaths due to all



causes was 201 (SMR = 83, 242.09 expected, p < 0.05).  For cohort B, there



were no significant (p > 0.05) excesses  of mortality from  any  cause.  Deaths



from all  malignant neoplasms (SMR = 53,  observed = 11, expected = 20.78, p <



0.05) and "all other causes" (SMR = 54,  observed = 9, expected = 16.80, p <





                                       54

-------
                           DRAFT—DO  NOT  QUOTE  OR CITE

 0.05)  were  significantly  decreased,  however.
     The  authors  calculated the  likelihood of  detecting a doubling and a qua-
 drupling  of the expected  occurrence  of leukemia for cohort A,  subcohort A, and
 cohort B.   These  likelihoods were  26% and 88%  for cohort A, 20% and 77% for
 subcohort A,  and  13%  and  51% for cohort  B.  Thus, this study suggests that some
 component of  the  SBR  manufacturing process may be a leukemogen.
 4.3.5.  Matanoski et  al.  (1982)
     This study was performed to determine whether there are health risks
 associated  with the production of  synthetic rubber, specifically styrene-buta-
 diene  rubber  (SBR).   The  populations studied were obtained from seven U.S. and
 one Canadian  rubber plants.  The study population consisted of males who had
 worked  for  more than  one year, and whose records contained birth dates and
 employment  dates.  In addition,  workers  selected had been employed by the
 facility from the date of the facility's first SBR production to December 1976.
 The total number of people available from the eight plants surveyed was 29,179,
 of whom 13,920 (48%) met the criteria for selection.
     Data obtained from the personnel records of each facility included employee
 name,  Social Security number, job history, date(s)  of employment,  birth infor-
 mation, death information, and limited data on retirees.   Individual  workers'
 jobs were coded according to first job, last job,  and job held longest during
 the period  of employment.  For the analyses, jobs  were categorized in four
 general work areas:   production, utilities,  maintenance,  and  other.  In three
 plants  (plants 3,  4,  and 5), race classification was unknown  for 176  (85%),
 329 (50%), and 4,540 (98%) of the cohort  populations,  respectively.  Plants  3
 and 4 were expected  to have employed black workers;  plant  5  had employed few or
no blacks at any time in its history.  In all,  7,209 (52%) of  the  study popula-
tion were unable to  be classified racially.   If race was  not  specified,  indivi-

                                       55

-------
                          DRAFT--DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE





duals were assumed to be white males.



     Follow-up activities to determine vital  status of the study population



in the seven U.S. plants included searching by the Social  Security Administra-



tion, tracing through motor vehicle administration records, and contacts by



telephone.  Through these follow-up activities, 42% of the study population



were traced.  For the Canadian plant, follow-up was performed by searching the



company insurance plan records for death benefit information.  Determination



of vital  status for the study populations revealed 10,899  workers alive, 2,097



known dead, and 924 lost to follow-up.  It was determined  from a 10% sample in



each plant that about 4% of the study population assumed to be living was



actually  dead.  Thus, as many as 440 deaths,  or 17% of the total possible



deaths, might have been missed.  For the populations who were known dead, 90%



of the death certificates requested were received.  Death  certificates were



coded according to the 8th revision of the ICD.



     Mast of the statistical analyses were done using the  worker records from



the time  when record-keeping systems became complete, or any time thereafter



through December 1976.  Females, workers employed less than one year, and those



with unknown birth dates or employment dates  were omitted.  The total eligible



population numbered 13,608.  SMRs for the workers as compared to the general



population were calculated by using a modified, version of  U.S. Death Rates Pro-



grams (Monson, 1979).  SMRs were calculated separately for the white population



and the black population, and the ratios were combined to  correct for differen-



ces in age, race, and calendar time.  The total number of  deaths occurring



among the eligible study population was 1,995, with an SMR of 81.  The study



cohort accounted for 250,000 person-years.



     Power calculations were performed to test the ability of the data to deter-



mine increases in risk of 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, and 2 times greater then the U.S.





                                       56

-------
                          DRAFT—DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE





population.  The calculations showed a 100% probability of detecting a twofold



increase in all causes of death and in all cancers, and an 89% probability of



detecting a 25% increase in lung cancer.



     The average period of follow-up was 19 to 20 years.  The average age at



death was 61 years.  The overall SMR for all causes of death was 81, with SMRs



of 98 for blacks and 78 for whites.  The low mortality among members of this



population is, in part, a reflection of the "healthy worker" effect.  However,



a question must also be raised as to the effect of the 440 possible deaths that



may have been missed.  Furthermore, the large difference in SMRs for blacks and



whites may be due to an undercounting of blacks and an overcounting of whites.



This is further exemplified by similar patterns in SMRs for all  accidents,



motor vehicle accidents, and suicides.  The SMRs for all causes  of death do not



appear to increase with duration of employment but do appear to  increase with



increasing follow-up period.



     The leukemias found in the population included nine acute,  five chronic,



and three unspecified on the death certificate, with a median latent period



of 17 years from time of first employment.  The types found were not considered



to have a distribution remarkably different from that found in the general



population.  The study population as a whole did not demonstrate leukemia in



excess.



     None of the analyses demonstrated significant increases in  SMRs for other



specific causes in the total study population.  Black males appear to have a



significantly elevated risk of arteriosclerotic heart disease (p < 0.05), but



this value may be artificially inflated due to undercounting of  the blacks,



resulting in a smaller denominator.  Vascular lesions of the central  nervous



system were also in excess in black males, but they were not statistically



significant.





                                       57

-------
                          DRAFT—DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

     Increases in mortality according to job classifications are noteworthy,
but only two of them are statistically significant (p < 0.05).   The SMR for
testicular cancer among maintenance workers is 294 (observed =  3, p < 0.05).
SMRs for esophagus, stomach and large intestine, and larynx cancers are
elevated in the utilities and maintenance work areas.  The SMR  for larynx can-
cer in utilities workers is statistically significant (SMR = 476, observed =
4, p < 0.05).  Hodgkin's disease is associated with high SMRs in all  work
areas.  Very few high SMRs are found for the production area.
     It should be further pointed out that, with the exceptions of Hodgkin's
disease and stomach cancer, all of the cancers had relatively long latent peri-
ods.  For all cancers, half of the individuals had had 12 years of employment
or more.
     In addition to complete ascertainment of deaths and racial  distribution,
further investigation is needed in order to obtain information  specific to
various jobs and the associated exposures of individuals in those jobs.  It
would also be useful to separate the number of years employed within  each job
category, in order to determine the periods of possible exposure in the work-
place.  Moreover, changes in the SBR process, in plant design,  and in worker
practices should be given greater attention in the evaluation of mortality for
the four worker categories studied.
     Other methodologic limitations of this study include the fact that less
than 50% of the total population of eight plants was studied.  This raises
questions about the population that was excluded due to lack of birth dates or
employment dates.  This may have been an older population, which probably had
longer exposure and was therefore more likely to suffer from occupational  dis-
eases.   Out of eight cohorts, only 50% were followed from 1943, whereas in
the rest of the plants, follow-up starting dates ranged from 1953 to  1970.  It

                                       58

-------
                          DRAFT--DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE





is probable that the employees from the latter plants  were not  followed  long



enough for malignancies to develop.



4.3.6.  Summary of Epidemlologic Studies



     McMichael et al. (1974) found significant (p < 0.05)  excess  mortality  from



cancers of the stomach, prostate, and lymphatic and hematopoietic system as



well as from diabetes mellitus, arteriosclerosis, and  ischemic  heart  disease  in



their historic prospective cohort study.  To evaluate  these excesses, McMichael



et al. (1976), in a case-control study, investigated exposure  rates  for  various



jobs within the same rubber plant for several cause-specific deaths.   The data



indicated that the most probable health risks were of  prostate  cancer in jani-



toring and trucking; bladder cancer in milling and reclaiming  operations; lym-



phatic and hematopoietic cancers in the synthetic plant;  and lymphatic leukemia



in the synthetic plant, inspection-finishing-repair, and  tread  cementing.  Non-



malignant mortality excesses included ischemic heart disease in the  synthetic



plant and tread cementing and diabetes mellitus in janitoring  and trucking  and



inspection-finishing-repair.



     Andjelkovich et al. (1976) carried out a similar  kind of  study  (historic



prospective cohort) in white males in a single rubber  plant, and  observed sig-



nificantly (p < 0.05) increased SMRs for malignant neoplasms of lymphatic and



hematopoietic tissues (monocytic leukemia and other neoplasms  of  lymphatic  and



hematopoietic tissue), chronic rheumatic heart disease, and cerebrovascular



disease.  They also observed high SMRs (p < 0.001) for all causes and for most



of the cause-specific deaths for a group of workers who had retired  between the



ages of 40 and 64.  Andjelkovich et al. (1977) evaluated  these  excesses  in



mortality ratios in relation to various work areas by  using the entire cohort



as a reference group, and found that only malignant neoplasms  of  the trachea,



bronchus, and lung were associated with the synthetic  latex department.   This





                                       59

-------
                          DRAFT—DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE





finding was based on only three observed deaths, however,  and no smoking data



were taken.



     Checkoway and Williams (1982) carried out an industrial  hygiene and hema-



tology cross-sectional survey at the same plant in which McMichael  et al. had



conducted their case-control study.  With the exception of the tank farm area,



in which 8-hour time-weighted averages for butadiene and styrene were observed



to be 20.3 ppm and 13.67 ppm, respectively, all other departments had mean



exposure levels of less than 2.0 ppm.  No evidence of hematologic abnormality



was noted.  Because of its cross-sectional design, however,  this study could



not be expected to identify an excess cancer risk.



     Meinhardt et al. (1982), conducted a retrospective cohort mortality study



at two plants in Texas.  Male rubber workers in one of the plants (plant A)



were followed from January 1, 1943 through March 31, 1975; employees in the



other plant (plant B) were followed from January 1, 1950 through March 31,



1976.  These intervals of observation are important to note  because the two



plants changed from a batch process for SBR production to  a  continuous-feed



operation in 1946.  With regard to cancers of the lymphatic  and hematopoietic



system and lymphatic leukemia, plant A exhibited excess mortalities, although



these were not statistically significant (p > 0.05); plant B  did not show any



mortality excesses.  When the mortality experience in plant  A was analyzed



further for those workers who had had at least 6 months of employment between



January 1, 1943, and December 31, 1945 (the interval for which the  batch pro-



cess was used), excess mortalities for the above-mentioned cancers  were shown



to be of borderline statistical  significance (0.05 < p < 0.01, two-sided).



It is also of interest to note that all of the employees from the total  cohort



of plant A whose causes of death were cancers of the lymphatic and  hematopoietic



tissues had been employed between 1943 and 1945.  Had the  analysis  in plant  A





                                       60

-------
                           DRAFT--DO NOT QUOTE  OR  CITE





 commenced  with  the  date  of first  employment  in 1946, the  SMRs  in  question  would



 have  been  reduced to  zoro, and  the  lack of excess  mortality  would have  been



 similar  to plant B.



      Matanoski  et al.  (1982)  also conducted  a  retrospective  cohort mortality



 study in which  eight  SBR plants were  involved.  As with the  cohort in plant B



 investigated  by Meinhardt  et  al., there was  a  general  lack of  excess mortali-



 ties.   It  should also  be noted  that half of  the cohort was followed from 1943



 to  1979.   The date of  entry for the remaining  half of the cohort  ranged from



 1953  to  1976, with follow-up  terminating in  1979.



      Although both the McMichael  et al.  (1976) and the Meinhardt  et al. (1982)



 studies  found some evidence of  an association  between styrene-butadiene exposure



 and lymphatic and hernatopoietic cancer,  confounding due to exposures to solvents



 cannot be  ruled out for  either  study.   In addition, the results from the Mein-



 hardt et al.  study for the subcohort employed  during the batch process of pro-



 duction were  only of borderline (0.05  <  p <  0.1, two-sided)  significance, and



 a possibly  serious underascertainment  of deaths, and/or selection factors in



 the choice  of the study  group may have  biased the  results.



     The Andjelkovich et al .  (1977) study found an association between employ-



 ment  in the synthetic part of the plant  with mortality from  cancer of the



 trachea, bronchus,  and lung.  The association was   based on only three deaths,



 however, and there was no control  for smoking.



     The study by Matanoski et  al. of almost  14,000 styrene-butadiene produc-



tion workers found  no excesses  of cancer mortality that were statistically



significant (p < 0.05).  Again,  however, a possibly serious  underascertainment



of deaths may have  biased the  results.  An under-counting of blacks in  the  study



population  may also  have  resulted  in a potential bias.



     The epidemiologic evaluation  of SBR workers with  regard  to the carcinoge-





                                       61

-------
                          DRAFT--DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE





nicity of 1,3-butadiene is particularly difficult because styrene may also be



a carcinogen and, in particular, a leukemogen (Ott et al., 1980;  Lilis and



Nicholson, 1976).  Because of the inconsistency of the results  from different



studies, the possible confounding due to solvent and styrene exposures, and the



potential for bias in some of the studies, the epidemiologic data are considered



inadequate for determining a causal  association between 1,3-butadiene exposure



and cancer in humans.



4.4.  QUANTITATIVE ESTIMATION



     This section deals with the incremental  unit risk for 1,3-butadiene in



air, and the potency of 1,3-butadiene relative to other carcinogens  that the



GAG has evaluated.  The incremental  unit risk estimate for an air pollutant is



defined as the excess lifetime cancer risk occurring in a hypothetical  popula-



tion in which all individuals are exposed continuously from birth throughout



their lifetimes to a concentration of 1  g/m^ of the agent  in the air they



breathe.  This calculation estimates in quantitative terms  the  impact of the



agent as a carcinogen.  Unit risk estimates are used for  two purposes:   1)  to



compare the carcinogenic potency of  several  agents with each other,  and 2)  to



give a crude indication of the population risk that  might be associated with



air exposure to these agents if the  actual  exposures were known.   Hereafter,



the term "unit risk" will  refer to incremental  unit  risk.



4.4.1.  Procedures for Determination of Unit  Risk



     The data used for quantitative  estimation are taken  from one or both  of



the following:  1) lifetime animal  studies,  and 2) human  studies  where  excess



cancer risk has been associated with exposure to the agent.   In animal  studies



it is assumed, unless evidence exists  to the  contrary,  that  if  a  carcinogenic



response occurs at the dose levels used in the study,  then  responses will  also




occur at all  lower doses,  with an incidence  determined  by an extrapolation  model.





                                       62

-------
                           DRAFT--DO  NOT QUOTE OR CITE





      There  is  no  solid  scientific basis for any mathematical extrapolation



 model that  relates  carcinogen exposure to cancer risks at the extremely low



 concentrations that must be dealt with in evaluating environmental hazards.



 For  practical  reasons,  such low levels of risk cannot be measured directly



 either  by animal  experiments or by epidemiologic studies.  Ue must, therefore,



 depend  on our  current understanding  of the mechanisms of carcinogenesis for



 guidance as to which risk  model to use.  At the present time the dominant view



 of the  carcinogenic process involves the concept that most agents that cause



 cancer  also cause irreversible damage to DNA.  This position is reflected by



 the  fact that a very large proportion of agents that cause cancer are also



 mutagenic.



     There is reason to expect that the quanta!  type of biological response,



 which is characteristic of mutagenesis, is associated with a linear nonthreshold



 dose-response relationship.  Indeed, there is substantial evidence from mutage-



 nicity  studies with both ionizing radiation and a wide variety of chemicals



 that this type of dose-response model is the appropriate one to use.   This is



 particularly true at the lower end of the dose-response curve; at higher doses,



 there can be an upward curvature, probably reflecting the effects of  multistage



 processes on the mutagenic response.  This linear nonthreshold dose-response



 relationship is also consistent with the relatively few epidemiologic studies



 of cancer responses to specific agents that contain enough information to make



the evaluation possible (e.g.,  radiation-induced leukemia, breast and thyroid



 cancer,  skin cancer induced by arsenic in drinking  water, liver cancer induced



by aflatoxin in the diet).   There is also some evidence from animal experiments



that is  consistent with the linear non-threshold model  (e.g., liver tumors



induced  in  mice by 2-acetylaminofluorene  in the  large-scale  EDgi  study at  the



National Center for Toxicological  Research,  and  the initiation stage  of the





                                       63

-------
                          DRAFT — DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE





two-stage carcinogenesis model  in rat liver and mouse skin).



     Based on the above evidence of low-dose linearity,  and because very few



compounds exhibit low-dose responses that are super-linear,  the linear non-



threshold model has been adopted as the primary basis for risk extrapolation to



low levels of the dose-response relationship.  The incremental risk estimates



made with this model  and the corresponding 95% upper-limit  incremental  unit



risks, should be regarded as conservative, representing  the most  plausible



upper limits for the risk, i.e., the true risk is not likely  to be  higher than



the estimates, but it could be  lower.



     The mathematical formulation chosen to describe  the linear nonthreshold



dose-response relationship at low doses is the linearized multistage model.



This model employs enough arbitrary constants to fit  almost any monotonically



increasing dose-response data,  and it incorporates a  procedure for  estimating



the largest possible linear slope (in the 95% confidence limit sense)  at low



extrapolated doses that is consistent with the data at all  dose levels  of the



experiment.  The multistage model, described below, is fit  to the data  in the



observational or experimental range.  The fit of the  curve  allows for a linear



term which dominates the risk estimate at low doses.   The 95% upper limit,



described below, is technically an upper-limit estimate  on  the linear term,



but, practically, functions as  the upper-limit low dose-response  function.



4.4.1.1.  Description of the Low-Dose Extrapolation Model



     Let P(d) represent the lifetime risk (probability)  of  cancer at dose d.



The multistage model  has the form
               P(d) = 1 - exp [-(q0 + qjd + qxd2 + ...+ qkdk)]
where





                                       64

-------
                           DRAFT—DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE



                           q-j  >_ 0, 1  =0,  1,  2, ...,  k
 Equivalently,
                    Pt(d)  = 1  -  exp  [-(q-^d  +  q2d2  + ...  +  qkdk)]
 where
                               P,(d)  =  P(<0  -  P(0)
                               t         1 - P(0)
 is  the  extra  risk  over  background  rate at dose d.


      The  point  estimate of the coefficients q-j, i = 0, 1, 2, ..., k, and con-

 sequently,  the  extra  risk function, Pt(d), at any given dose d, is calculated

 by  maximizing the  likelihood  function of the data.


      The  point  estimate and the 95% upper confidence limit of the extra risk,

 Pt(d),  are  calculated by using the computer program GLOBAL83, originally

 developed by Crump and Watson (1979).  At low doses, upper 95% confidence

 limits  on the extra risk and  lower 95% confidence limits on the dose producing

 a given risk are determined from a 95% upper confidence limit,  q^, on parameter

 qj.   Whenever q^ > 0, at low  doses the extra risk Pt(d) has approximately the

 form  Pt(d)  = qj x d.  Therefore, q^ x d is a 95% upper confidence limit on

 the extra risk, and R/q^ is a 95% lower confidence limit  on the dose, pro-

 ducing an extra risk of R.  Let LQ be the maximum value of the  log-likelihood

 function.  The upper-limit,  q^, is calculated by increasing q1  to a  value


q1 such that when the log-likelihood is remaximized  subject to  this  fixed

 value qj for the linear coefficient,  the  resulting maximum value of  the
                                       65

-------
                           DRAFT--DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

 log-likelihood  LI  satisfies the equation

                             2 (L0 - LI) = 2.70554

 where  2.70554 is the cumulative 90% point of the chi-square distribution with
 one degree of freedom, which corresponds to a 95% upper limit (one-sided).  This
 approach of computing the upper confidence limit for the extra risk Pt(d) is an
 improvement on  the Crump et al . (1977) model.  The upper confidence limit for
 the extra risk  calculated at low doses is always linear.  This is conceptually
 consistent with the linear nonthreshold concept discussed earlier.  The slope,
 q-p is taken as an upper bound of the potency of the chemical  in inducing
 cancer at low doses.
     In fitting the dose-response model, the number of terms in  the polynomial
 is chosen equal to (h-1), where h is the number of dose groups in the experiment,
 including the control  group.
     Whenever the multistage model  does not  fit the data sufficiently well,
 data at the highest dose is deleted and the  model  is refit to  the rest of the
 data.  This is continued until  an acceptable fit to the data is  obtained.  To
 determine whether or not a fit is acceptable, the chi-square statistic
                              X2=
                                   .=1  NiPi  (1-Pi)
is calculated where N^  is the number of animals  in  the  i^1  dose  group,  Xj  is
the number of animals in the itn dose group  with  a  tumor  response,  P^  is the
probability of a response in the itn dose  group  estimated by  fitting the
                                       66

-------
                          DRAFT—DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

multistage model to the data, and h is the number of remaining groups.   The
fit is determined to be unacceptable whenever X2 is  larger than the  cumulative
99% point of the chi-square distribution with f degrees  of freedom,  where  f
equals the number of dose groups minus the number of non-zero  multistage co-
efficients.
     When all the higher order terms in the multistage model are zero  except
the linear term, the multistage model reduces to the one-hit model,  which  is  a
true low-dose linear nonthreshold model.  As will  be seen with the animal  data,
this is the case with 1,3-butadiene.
     For cases of partial lifetime exposure where time-to-tumor or time-to-
tumor death is known, Crump and Howe (1983a) have developed the multistage
model to include a time-dependent dose pattern.  The form of this model  is
one which is linear in dose and in which time has a  power and  form determined
by both the number of assumed stages and the stage affected by the carcinogen.
A best fit is determined by the method of maximum likelihood  in the  ADOLL183
computer program (Crump and Howe, 1983b).  Application of this program to  the
NTP data was unsuccessful because of lack of convergence.
4.4.1.2.  Selection of Data—For some chemicals, several  studies in  different
animal species, strains, and sexes, each run at several  doses  and different
routes of exposure, are available.  A choice must be made as to which  of the
data sets from several studies to use in the model.   It  may also be  appropriate
to correct for metabolism differences between species  and for  absorption factors
via different routes of administration.  The procedures  used  in evaluating these
data are consistent with the approach of making a maximum-likely risk  estimate.
They are listed below:
     1.  The tumor incidence data are separated according to organ sites or
tumor types.  The set of data (i.e., dose and tumor  incidence) used  in the

                                       67

-------
                          DRAFT—DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE





model  is the set in which the incidence is statistically significantly higher



than for the control for at least one test dose level, or in which the tumor



incidence  rate shows a statistically significant trend with respect to dose



level, or  in which a specific tumor appears unusually early for that site.  The



data set that gives the highest estimate of the lifetime carcinogenic risk,



q-p is selected in most cases.  However, efforts are made to exclude data sets



that produce spuriously high risk estimates because of a small  number of animals.



That is, if two sets of data show a similar dose-response relationship,  and one



has a  very small  sample size, the set of data having the larger sample size is



selected for calculating the carcinogenic potency.



     2.  If there are two or more data sets of comparable size  that are  iden-



tical  with respect to species, strain, sex, and tumor sites, the geometric mean



of qp estimated from each of these data sets, is  used for risk assessment.



If, as is the case with the 1,3-butadiene NTP (1984) study, males and females of



the species show a basically similar response, the  usual  procedure would be to



use the geometric mean of their individual  q-^'s for the incremental  95%  upper-



limit  unit risk.



     3.  If two or more significant tumor sites are observed in the same study,



and if the data are available, the number of animals with at least one of the



specific tumor sites under consideration is used as incidence data in the model.



4.4.1.3.  Calculation of Human Equivalent Dosages  from Animal Data--Fo1lowing



the suggestion of Mantel  and Schneiderman (1975),  it is assumed that mg/surface



area/day is an equivalent dose between species. Since, to a close approximation,



surface area is proportional to the two-thirds power of weight, as would be the



case for a perfect sphere, the exposure in  mg/day per two-thirds  power of the



weight is also considered to be equivalent  exposure.  In  an animal  experiment,



this equivalent dose is computed in the following manner:





                                       68

-------
                          DRAFT—DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE



Let


     Le = duration of experiment


     le = duration of exposure


     m = average dose per day in mg during administration of the agent  (i.e.,
         during le), and


     W = average weight of the experimental  animal


The lifetime exposure is then
                                           2/3
                                     Le x W
     1,3-Butadiene is slightly soluble in water and can be considered a par-


tially soluble vapor.  The dose in m = mg/day of partially soluble  vapors  is


proportional to the 02 consumption, which in turn is proportional to W2/3  and


is also proportional  to the solubility of the gas in body fluids, which can be


expressed as an absorption coefficient, r, for the gas.  Therefore, expressing


the Q£ consumption as 02 = k W2/3, where k is a constant independent of species


and V = mg/m3 of the agent in air, it follows that:
                            m = k VK/'* x v x r
or
                            d =   m   = kvr
                                w2/3
     In the absence of experimental  information  or a  sound  theoretical  argument


to the contrary, the absorption fraction, r,  is  assumed to  be the same  for  all



                                       69

-------
                          DRAFT--DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

 species.  Therefore, for these substances (e.g., 1,3-butadiene) a certain con-
 centration  in ppm orp g/m3 in experimental animals is assumed equivalent to
 the same concentration in humans.  This is supported by the observation that
 the minimum alveolar concentration necessary to produce a given "stage" of
 anesthesia  is similar in man and animals (Dripps et al., 1977).  When the
 animals are exposed via the oral route and human exposure is via inhalation or
 vice versa, the assumption is made, unless there is pharmacokinetic evidence to
 the contrary, that absorption is equal by either exposure route.
 4.4.1.4.  Calculation of the Unit Risk from Animal  Studies—The risk associated
 with d mg/kg2/3/day is obtained from GLOBAL83 and,  for most cases of interest to
 risk assessment, can be adequately approximated by  P(d) = 1 - exp (-q*d).  An
 incremental "unit risk" in units X is simply the risk corresponding to an expo-
 sure of X = 1.  To estimate this value, the number  of mg/kg2/3/day corresponding
 to one unit of X is determined and substituted into the above relationship.
 Thus, for example, if X is in units of ppm orp g/m3 in the air, then for 1,3-
 butadiene, d = 1, when ppm oru g/m3 is the unit used to compute parameters  in
 animal  experiments.
     If exposures are given in terms  of ppm in air,  then the conversion factor
 to mg/m3 is
                       ppm = 1.2 x mo]ecular weight  (gas)  mg/nr
                                   molecular weight  (air)
4.4.1.4.1.  Adjustments for less than lifetime  duration  of  experiment—When
analyzing quantal data, if the duration  of  experiment  Le is  less than  the
natural lifespan of the test animal  L, the  slope  q*, or  more  generally the
exponent g(d), is increased by multiplying  by a factor (L/LP)3.  We  assume that
                                       70

-------
                          DKAFT--DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE



if the average dose d had been continued, the age-specific rate of cancer would


have continued to increase as a constant function of the background rate.  The


age-specific rates for humans increase at least by the second power of the age


and often by a considerably higher power, as demonstrated by Doll  (1971).  Thus,


it is expected that the cumulative tumor rate would increase by at least the


third power of age.  Using this fact, it is assumed that the slope q1, or


more generally the exponent g(d), would also increase by at least  the third


power of age.  As a result, if the slope q-^ [or g(d)] is calculated at age


Le, we expect that if the experiment had been continued for the full  lifespan,


L, at the given average exposure, the slope q^ [or g(d)] would have been

                            o
increased by at least (L/l_e) .


     For time-to-tumor data, this adjustment is also conceptually  consistent


with the proportional hazard model proposed by Cox (1972) and the  time-to-tumor


model considered by Crump (1979), where the probabiity of cancer by age t and


at dose d is given by
                        P(d,t) = 1 - exp[-f(t) x
It is also consistent with the partial lifetime exposure extension of the


multistage model developed by Crump and Howe (1983a), which as discussed above


is linear in dose, but has a power function of time.


4.4.1.5.  Interpretation of Quantitative Estimates—For several  reasons, the


unit risk estimate based on animal bioassays is only  an approximate indication


of the absolute risk in populations exposed to known  carcinogen  concentrations.


First, there are important species differences in uptake, metabolism, and organ


distribution of carcinogens, as well  as species differences in target site


susceptibility, immunological responses, hormone function, dietary factors,  and



                                       71

-------
                          DRAFT—DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE





disease.  Second, the concept of equivalent doses for humans compared to animals



on a mg/surface area basis is virtually without experimental verification



regarding carcinogenic response.  Finally, human populations are variable with



respect to genetic constitution and diet, living environment, activity patterns,



and other cultural factors.



     The unit risk estimate can give a rough indication of the relative potency



of a given agent as compared with other carcinogens.   The comparative potency



of different agents is more reliable when the comparison is based on studies



in the same test species, strain, and sex, and by the same route of exposure,



preferably inhalation.



     The quantitative aspect of carcinogen risk assessment is included here



because it may be of use in the regulatory decision-making process, e.g.,



setting regulatory priorities, evaluating the adequacy of technology-based



controls, etc.  However, it should be recognized that the estimation of cancer



risks to humans at low levels of exposure is uncertain.  Because of the limited



data available from animal bioassays, especially at  the high dose levels re-



quired for testing, almost nothing is known about the true shape of the dose-



response curve at low environmental  levels.  At best, the linear extrapolation



model  used here provides a rough but plausible estimate of the upper limit of



risk; i.e., it is not likely that the true risk would be much more than the



estimated risk, but it could be considerably lower.   The risk estimates pre-



sented in subsequent sections should not be regarded  as accurate representations



of the true cancer risk even when the exposures are accurately defined.  The



estimates presented may, however, be factored into regulatory decisions to the



extent that the concept of upper risk limits is found to be useful.



4.4.1.6.   Alternative Models--The methods used by the CAG for quantitative ex-



trapolation from animal  to man are generally conservative, i.e., tending toward





                                       72

-------
                           DRAFT--DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE





 high  estimates  of  risk.   The  most  important part of the methodology contribu-



 ting  to this  conservatism is  the CAG's use of the linearized multistage non-



 threshold  extrapolation model.  There are a variety of other extrapolation



 models that could  be  used, most of which would give lower risk estimates.



 Among these alternative models, two which are currently popular and which often



 tend  to give  different low-dose extrapolations than the multistage model are



 the log-probit  and Weibull models.  These models have not been used in the fol-



 lowing analysis of the mouse  data  because their fits to the 1,3-butadiene data



 base  were  considered  poorer than that of the multistage model.  As discussed



 below, all models  are of  limited value for predicting low-dose risks for 1,3-



 butadiene  because mouse responses were greater than 60% at the lowest dose



 tested, and rat responses were far less sensitive than those of the mouse.



 4.4.2.  Calculation of Quantitative Estimates



      Human studies have provided inadequate evidence for the carcinogenicity



 of 1,3-butadiene.  Furthermore, concurrent exposure to several other possible



 carcinogens also limits the use of epidemiologic studies as  primary sources for



 calculating quantitative  risk estimates.  For animal-to-human extrapolation,



 there are two suitable animal bioassays, both showing significant  carcinogenic



 response.   The first, a rat inhalation study, showed statistically significant



 increases  in several  tumor sites in both males and  females (Hazleton Laborato-



 ries, Ltd., 1981a).  The second study was  the NTP (1984)  mouse inhalation



 study, which showed high statistically significant  increases (p <  0.01)  both in



 hemangiosarcomas of the heart and  malignant  lymphomas  and in both  males  and



 females at 625 ppm and 1,250 ppm.   Both  of these tumor types are  life-threaten-



 ing and appeared quite early in the study.   As discussed  at  length in  the



qualitative section and shown in Table 8,  several other tumor sites  were  also



significantly  increased in the study,  which  was  stopped at 60-61 weeks due  to





                                       73

-------
                          DRAFT—DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE




high mortality from tumors in the treated groups.


     The mice were used for risk estimation, since they were far more sensitive


than the rats.  Incremental 95% upper-limit unit risk estimates were calculated


from both the male and female mouse data.  For the male mice, the numbers of


animals either with tumors at significantly increased sites, or with tumors


considered unusual for 60 weeks (preputial  gland squamous cell  carcinomas and


Zymbal gland carcinomas (see Table 10) were 2/50, 43/50, and 40/50 for the


control, 625-ppm, and 1,250-ppm groups, respectively.  For the females, the


numbers of animals with significantly increased tumors or brain gliomas were


4/50, 31/49, and 45/49.  These results are  presented in Table 11.  Also presented


in Table 11 are the maximum likelihood estimates (MLE) and the 95% upper-limit


unit risk estimates (q^) based on these data.  The initial upper-limit esti-


mates based on the 60-week (male) and 61-week (female) studies are then adjusted


to project for natural lifetime risk (see section 4.4.1.4.1.).   The final


estimates are q^ = 7.1 x 10~2 (ppm)"1 for the males and q^ = 5.9 x 10~2


(ppm)~l for the females.  Since the data sets are so comparable, the geometric

       if            01
mean, q^ = 6.5 x 10~^ (ppm)"1, was chosen as the final 95% upper-limit unit


risk estimate.


     This estimate can also be presented in terms of yg/m3.  The conversion


factor is
                         M.W. 1,3-butadiene           54.1

          1 ppb = 1.2 x  M.W. air= 1-2 * 28.8
or        1 ppb = 2.25 ug/m3
or        1 ppm = 2.25 x 103 yg/m3
                                       74

-------
                           DRAFT—DO NOT  QUOTE  OR  CITE
               TABLE  11.   NUMBERS OF  MICE  WITH  AT  LEAST  ONE  OF  THE
                  STATISTICALLY  SIGNIFICANT  INCREASED  TUMORS, OR
             TUMORS CONSIDERED  UNUSUAL  AT  TIME  OF  TERMINAL SACRIFICE.
          ALSO,  MLE AND 95%-UPPER-LIMIT INCREMENTAL  UNIT RISK ESTIMATES3
Nominal
exposure
(ppm)
0
625
1,250
Equivalent
continuous
exposure^
(ppm)
0
111.6
223.2
No. males
with tumors/
no. examined0
2/50 (4%)
43/50 (86%)
40/50 (80%)
No. females
with tumors/
no. examined0
4/50 (8%)
31/49 (63%)
45/49 (92%)
dSee Tables 8 and  10 for tumor sites.
^Continuous equivalent dose = animal exposure x 6/24 x 5/7.
cExamined for either hemangiosarcomas or lymphomas.
                                               Males
                            Females
Initial maximum likelihood estimates q-^ = 8.1 x 10~3 (ppm)"1   q-^ = 1.0 x 10"2 (ppm)"1
Initial estimates of 95% upper limit q*
1.36 x ID'2 (ppm)-1  q* = 1.18 x 10~2 (ppm)'1
Adjustment factor for early sacrifice /104\3   c
                                      V~~'
Final  estimate of 95% upper limit
Geometric mean of 95% upper limit

                             = 4.96
 7.1  x  10-2  (ppm)-1    5.9  x  10~2 (ppm)'1


   qi  =  6.5 x  ID"2  (ppm)"1
                                       75

-------
                          DRAFT—DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE
then      q* = 6.5 x 10'2 (pptn)'1 x     1	    = 2,9 x 10'5 (yg/m3)
                                    2.25 xlO3 ug/m3
4.4.3.  Comparison of Human and Animal  Inhalation Studies
     The purpose of this section is to  evaluate whether or not the animal-to-
man extrapolated estimate of 1,3-butadiene-caused cancer is reasonably borne
out by human data.  The section considers the limited data base and determines
to what extent extrapolation from the positive animal  data might overestimate
the human response.
     While mouse exposures of 625 ppm and 1,250 ppm of 1,3-butadiene (6 hours/
day, 5 days/week for 60-61 weeks) caused a broad spectrum of cancers,  human
response associated with the SBR process was not consistent across studies.
Various cohorts displayed excess mortality from cancers of the stomach or
intestine, prostate, and/or respiratory system.  The most consistent excesses
(and, therefore, the focus of this section) appear to be restricted to cancers
of the lymphatic and hematopoietic systems, cancers which include leukemias,
Hodgkin's disease, and lymphosarcomas.
     It must be emphasized that exposure to 1,3-butadiene alone cannot be iso-
lated from exposure to several  other potential carcinogens.  Especially associ-
ated with the SBR process is concurrent exposure to styrene, a compound for
which there is limited evidence of carcinogenicity in animals and inadequate
evidence in humans (IARC, 1982).  The small amount of human evidence associated
with styrene exposure and cancer suggests an association with leukemia and,
possibly, lymphomas.  Styrene,  like 1,3-butadiene, metabolizes to an epoxide;
both epoxides are the suspected carcinogens.  (Ethylene oxide, also an epoxide,
is also associated with leukemias).  In addition to styrene, the SBR process
                                       76

-------
                          DRAFT—DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE





involves numerous other exposures concurrent with 1,3-butadiene.  These concur-



rent exposures will not be dealt with in the following analysis, because if the



animal risk extrapolation based on 1,3-butadiene alone overestimates the human



risk, then the animal risk extrapolation will most likely be too high.



     Probably the strongest evidence for human cancer associated with the SBR



process is that of Meinhardt et al. (1982), in which workers exposed to the



high-temperature batch polymerization process from 1943 through 1945 showed a



marginally significant increase in cancers of the lymphatic and hernatopoietic



tissues, with an SMR of 212 from 9 deaths out of 600 study members.  For workers



first exposed after the process was changed to continuous feed in 1946, with



correspondingly less exposure, no deaths from lymphopoietic system cancers



occurred among more than 1,000 study members.  Unfortunately, no exposure



estimates are available for the pre-1946 cohort.  For the cohort exposed after



1946, only 1,3-butadiene measurements taken after 1975 are available.  They



show an 8-hour time-weighted average mean concentration of 1.24 ppm butadiene



fc  1.20 standard deviation [SD]), 0.10 ppm benzene (t  0.035 SO), and 0.94



ppm styrene (t  1.23 SD).  (Benzene is not used in SBR manufacturing, but may



be present as an impurity of styrene or toluene.)  The Meinhardt et al. (1982)



study also contained an analysis from a second plant whose workers were first



exposed in 1950.  Based on a cohort of 1,094, the SMR for cancers of the lym-



phatic and hematopoietic tissues was 78, slightly higher than the overall  SMR



of 66, the latter being significantly (p < 0.05) less than that of the compa-



rable general  population.  Meinhardt et al. reported average 1,3-butadiene



exposure levels in 1977 of 13.5 ppm.



     The next  strongest evidence for cancer associated with the SBR process is



based on the case-control study of McMichael  et al.  (1976).  These authors



estimated an age-standardized risk ratio of 6.2 for  lymphatic and hematopoietic





                                       77

-------
                           DRAFT—00 NOT QUOTE OR CITE





 cancers  among workers with at  least 5 years of exposure in the synthetic plant,



 relative to all  other workers  as controls.  (This ratio decreased to 2.4 when



 a matched  control analysis was used.)  The synthetic plant is where the SBR



 process  is located.  McMichael et al. also found a dose-related risk ratio in



 the synthetic plant by number  of years worked there.



     Estimates of exposures in the McMichael et al. study are based upon a



 later paper.  Checkoway and Williams (1982) measured 1,3-butadiene, styrene,



 benzene, and toluene levels at the same synthetic plant in which McMichael et



 al. (1976) found that "leukemia and lymphoma (cases) among hourly paid rubber



 workers from one company were  6 times more likely than controls to have worked



 at jobs in the SBR plant."  Exposure levels of 1,3-butadiene typically averaged



 below 1 ppm, but exposure levels in the tank farm area averaged 20 ppm.



     The most extensive investigation specifically designed to study the health



 effects of the SBR process shows very little association of 1,3-butadiene with



 lymphatic and hematopoietic tissue cancer (ICD 200-207).  The Matanoski et al.



 study of one Canadian and seven U.S. synthetic rubber plants showed, possibly,



 a trend with more exposure as defined by production, maintenance,  utilities,



 or other jobs, but none of the SMRs (Table 12)  are statistically significant.



 Only Hodgkin's disease (ICD 201), shows a consistently high SMR in all  three



 cohorts, but the numbers of cases were  small.   No exposure estimates were



 presented in the Matanoski  et al. report,  but  the plants studied were of the



 same type as those studied by Meinhardt et al.   Some workers in seven of the



eight plants might have started as  early as 1943, and Matanoski  states  (per-



sonal  communication)  that the open  batch process  in  several  of these plants was



continued into the early 1970s.  Based  on  these  observations,  the  estimates  of



20 ppm for production  workers,  10 ppm for  maintenance workers,  and 5 ppm for



utility workers  have  been used  for  calculation  purposes.





                                       78

-------
TABLE 12.   SUMMARY OF CANCER OF LYMPHATIC AND HEMATOPOIETIC TISSUES ASSOCIATED WITH THE
        STYRENE-BUTADIENE SYNTHETIC RUBBER PROCESS.   CONFIDENCE LIMITS ON ACTUAL SMRs
 PREDICTED EXCESS DEATHS BASED ON INITIAL MLE INCREMENTAL UNIT RISKS OF THE MOUSE DATA
Study
Meinhardt
et al .
(1982)
Plant A
1943-1945
Plant A
1946-1976

Plant B
1950-1976


Matanoski
et al.
(1982)
(by job
last held)
Production

Maintenance
Utilities
McMichael
et al.
TT976)









Sample Cancer
size type Observed

Lymphatic and
hematopoietic
tissues ICD
600 (200-205) 9

1,062 Same as above 0


1,094 Same as above 2





All lympho-
poietic ICD
3,269 (200-207) 11

3,683 Same as above 13
550 Same as above 4

All lym-
phatic and
hematopoietic
(200-209)







?Test for observed cancers not significantly
a = 0.05, power determined by formula Z-, a
cMore deaths
*p < 0.05.
**p < 0.01.
predicted than observed.


Excess deaths
from exposure
predicted from
95% mouse data
Confidence (observed-
Expected SMR intervals expected)8




4.25 2.12 0.96-4.02 1.7 (4.75)*c

1.54 0 0-2.34 0.2 (-1.54)


2.55 0.78 0.09-2.83 2.3 (-0.55)







10.6 1.04 0.52-1.86 18.0 (0.4)**

16.2 0.80 0.47-1.37 9.3 (-3.2)**
6.5 0.62 0.17-1.58 0.5 (-2.5)

6.2 No
(risk further
ratio in estimates
synthetic possible
plants
2.4
in matched
controls



different from predicted (Poisson test or normal
= Z - 2 (SMR0-5 - 1)E°-5 (Beaumont and Breslow,



Power
to detect
predicted
deaths
(a-. k
0.05)D Comments
Estimates
from 1943-
1945: 20 ppm
from 1946-
12% 1952: 10 ppm
Average
3% exposure =
1.24

23% Average
exposure =
13.5

Same types of
plants as those
studied by
Meinhardt et al .
99% Assume: 20 ppm
(estimate)
53% 10 ppm (estimate)
4% 5 ppm (estimate)

Increases asso-
ciated with com-
pounding, mixing,
cement mixing,
inspection-
finishing-repai r,
synthetic plant.
Average exposure
< 1 ppm except
for tank farm
area (20 ppm)
approximation to the Poisson).
1981).




-------
                          DRAFT—DO NOT QUOTE  OR  CITE


     Is the unit risk estimate based on the mouse tumor data  a  reasonable

extrapolation?  To answer this question we must be able to  estimate  the  predic-

ted effect based on actual  (or estimated)  exposure.   (We must also assume  the

effect on these cancers from other exposures to be nil.)  For illustration,  we

choose the Meinhardt et al. (1982) study plant B, with estimated exposure  of

13.5 ppm.  Although this exposure was measured in 1977, we  will  consider it  to

be representative of exposures from 1950 through  1976.  We  must also know  that

the 1,094 study members converted to 19,742 person-years at risk for an  average

of 18 years per person.  Since average employment or exposure is given as  10.78

years, we can estimate the expected contribution  as follows:

     1.  The continuous lifetime equivalent exposure based  on 10 working

         years out of about 50 possible remaining years is:
            13.5 ppm x 10.78 years x 240 day x 8_ hours = 0.64 ppm
                         50          365       24
     2.  The inital best estimate (MLE) of risk based on the mouse data is Q]_ =

         8.1 x 10~3 (ppm)"1 for the males, qx = 1.0 x 10"2 (ppm)"1 for the fe-

         males, and a geometric mean of q-^ = 9.0 x 10"3 (ppm)"1, based on human

         equivalent continuous exposure.  This geometric mean MLE incremental

         risk estimate will be used to predict human excess deaths for the

         present purpose of deciding whether the number of deaths among indus-

         trial workers is consistent with the expected deaths derived using the

         animal extrapolation procedure.  The initial estimate (Table 11) is

         used since it projects the limited animal observation period (60-61

         weeks out of a 2-year lifetime) to the the limited human observation

         period (average of up to 29 years out of 50 years remaining lifetime).
                                       80

-------
                           DRAFT--DO  NOT  QUOTE  OR  CITE


      3.   Based  on  the  unit risk  factor q^  =  9.0 x 10~3  (ppm)   ,  each of the

          1,094  workers  would  be  expected to  have  an additional lifetime risk of



                   R  =  9.0  x  lO-3 (ppm)-1 x 0.64 = 5.8 x  10-3



      4.   Based  on  1,094 workers  at risk  for  18 of their  50  remaining years,

          this converts  to  the  following expected  excess  number of cancers:
                       5.8  x  ID'3 x  i,094 x 18 = 2.3
                                           50
      5.   In addition to the 2.55 cancer deaths expected based on no exposure

          (Table  12), we could expect, with the exposure, to observe 4.8

          deaths  from cancers of the lymphatic and hematopoietic tissues.  The

          probability of observing two or fewer deaths (Table 12) with 4.8

          expected is



                                             2     xx
                   P (deaths <_ 2|x = 4.8) =  I   e~   x     = 0.14
                                            x=o     xT



     The  statistical power to detect a predicted SMR of (4.8/2.55)  or 1.9 is

given by  Beaumont and Breslow (1981) as Z1-g = Za - 2 (SMR0-5 - 1)E°-5.   For

plant B this is



                  Zj_g = 1.96 - 2 (1.9°-5 - 1) (2.55)0-5 = 0.75



which corresponds to a power of 0.23,  or 23% at  a = 0.05.
                                       81

-------
                       DRAFT--DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

     Results based on similar calculations are presented in Table 12 for the
other two Meinhardt cohorts and for three Matanoski  cohorts.  They show incon-
sistent results.  For the 1943-1945 plant A Meinhardt cohort, the deaths pre-
icted from animal extrapolation actually underpredict the observed human
response (p < 0.5).  For the other two Meinhardt cohorts and the Matanoski
utilities cohort, the predicted and observed results are not significantly  dif-
ferent, although the power to detect the predicted difference in these three
cases is low--23% or less.  For the two larger Matanoski  cohorts, the extrapo-
lated deaths do significantly (p < 0.01 in both cases) overpredict response.
Furthermore, the power to detect the predicted response is 99% in the mainte-
nance cohort.
     The interpretation of these results, if we dismiss momentarily  the large
uncertainties in the exposure estimates, is that no  predicted results will
satisfy the observed results in all six cohorts.  Were we to lower the risk
estimates to try to better accommodate the Matanoski  maintenance and production
cohorts, we would further underestimate the observed  results for the Meinhardt
and early plant A cohort.  Based on the information  we have, no single extrapo-
lated value can predict the human response.  It seems probable that  the potency
value we have extrapolated will  overpredict human response by a factor of about
3.  Considering the uncertainties in the human exposure data, however, the
animal  extrapolation is the best that can be achieved at  present.
     Finally, the same analysis as computed for lymphatic and hernatopoietic
cancers in Table 12, can be done for all cancers on  the theory that  1,3-buta-
diene might be a broad-spectrum carcinogen in humans  as it is in mice.  This
analysis is presented in Table 13.  Since we have used the same extrapolation
from the mouse data, the same number of excess deaths as  predicted in Table 12
will result, but these excess deaths are spread out  over  all cancers.  It should

                                       82

-------
                                   TABLE 13.   SUMMARY  OF  ALL  CANCERS  (ICD  140-205)  ASSOCIATED  WITH  THE
                              STYRENE-BUTADIENE  SYNTHETIC RUBBER  PROCESS.   CONFIDENCE  LIMITS ON  ACTUAL  SMRs
                          PREDICTED EXCESS DEATHS  BASED ON INITIAL  MLE  INCREMENTAL  UNIT  RISKS  OF THE  MOUSE  DATA
oo
CO



All cancers
Sample (ICD 140-205)
Study size Observed Expected
Meinhardt
et al .
(1982)
Plant A
1943-1945 600 39 45.14
Plant A
1946-1976 1,062 10 12.19

Plant B
1950-1976 1,094 11 20.78


Matanoski
et al.
(1982)
(by job
last held)
Production 3,269 94 105.6

Maintenance 3,683 168 176.8
Utilities 550 25 26.3
Excess deaths
from exposure
predicted from
95% mouse data
confidence (observed-
SMR intervals expected)3




0.86 0.63-1.18 1.7 (-6.14)

0.82 0.45-1.51 0.2 (-2.19)


0.58 30-0.95* 2.3 (-9.78)**







0.89 0.73-1.09 18.0 (-9.6)**

0.95 0.82-1.11 9.3 (-8.8)
0.95 0.58-2.07 0.5 (-1.3)
Power
to detect
predicted
deaths
u=
0.05)b




5%

3%


7%







39%

10%
3%





Comments
Estimates
from 1943-
1945: 20 ppm
from 1946-
1952: 10 ppm
Average
exposure =
1.24

Average
exposure =
13.5

Same types of
plants as those
studied by
Meinhardt et al .
Assume: 20 ppm
(estimate)
10 ppm (estimate)
5 ppm (estimate)
      ?Test for observed cancers not significantly  different  from predicted (Poisson test or normal  approximation to the Poisson),
      Da = 0.05, power determined by formula ll_&  =1-2 (SMR0-5 - 1)E°'5 (Beaumont and Breslow, 1981).
      cMore deaths predicted than observed.
      *p < 0.05.
      **p < 0.01.

-------
                          URAFT--DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE





be noted that only one of the SMRs is statistically significant and that  all,



in fact, are less than one.  Based on the predicted excess  deaths  extrapolated



from animal  data and estimated exposures, two of the cohorts experienced  signi-



ficantly fewer deaths than predicted.  For one of these cohorts, the Meinhardt



plant 8, the deficit in observed versus expected deaths was significant even



if there were no predicted deaths.  For the other, the Matanoski production



workers, a reduction of predicted deaths from 18 to 6  would eliminate statis-



tical significance at the p = 0.05 level  (one-sided).   This corresponds to a



reduction of the extrapolated unit risk estimate by a  factor of 3.   This  is the



only cohort with a power greater than 10%--it has a power of 39%--of detecting



the predicted results.



     Comparing Tables 12 and 13, we see fairly similar results: weak, if any,



evidence of a human carcinogenic risk from 1,3-butadiene, but also no strong



evidence that the unit risk extrapolation from animal  to human results is



unreasonable, or that it seriously overpredicts a potential risk.



4.4.4.  Relative Potency



     One of the uses of quantitative estimation is to  compare the  relative



potencies of different carcinogens.  To estimate relative potency, the unit



risk slope factor is multiplied by the molecular weight, and the resulting



number is expressed in terms of (mmol/kg/day)-1.  This is called the relative



potency index.



     Figure 2 is a histogram representing the frequency distribution of potency



indices of 54 suspect carcinogens evaluated by the CAG.  The actual data summa-



rized by the histogram are presented in Table 14.  Where positive  human data are



available for a compound, they have been used to calculate the index.  Where no



human data are available, animal oral studies and animal inhalation studies have



been used, in that order.  In the present case, only the animal inhalation studies





                                       84

-------
                                                                                   FREQUENCY
00
                 in
                 c
                 -s
                 (D
CTT3 DC
^ O -••

c-t- CO rt
:3- 3 O
fD o to.
   •< -s
o    01
Cu —*• 3

o cx -s
_i. -J. n>
3 O ~O
O fD ~S
CQ l/> fD
fD    to
3 O fD
            on  en -".
            CO  j^ 3
            n>    «£j
            l/>  I/)
 fD ~O n>

 r+ O -h
   r+ -S
 £T3    fD
 "S O -Cl
 O O) £=
 C T fD
TD O 3
 .  -J. O
   3 '<
   O
   to O-
   fD -••
   3 to
   to c+
      -s
   fD ->•
   < cr

   —' r+
   c: -'•
   Qj O
   n- 3
   fD
   Q- O
                  c-t
                  ^~
                  n>
                                      O
                                      D
                                             to
O
-i

g    -^
O


_    01
2
O
m
X    O)
                                             00

                             MJ
                                                     t   I    I   I   i    l    i   i   i    l    I   i   I    i   i   i    i    i   I   I
X

~A
o
                                                                                                                                                   ro
                                                                                                                                                 to
                                                                                                                                                 x
        O
        c
                                                                                                                                                         m
                                                                                                                                                         O
                                                                                                                                                         c
                                                                                                                                                         >
                                                                                                                                                         m
         O
         c
         m
         O
         c
         m

-------
    TABLE 14.  RELATIVE CARCINOGENIC POTENCIES AMONG 54 CHEMICALS EVALUATED  BY  THE  CARCINOGEN  ASSESSMENT GROUP
                                           AS SUSPECT HUMAN CARCINOGENS
Level
of evidence3
Compounds
Acrylonitrile
Aflatoxin B^
Aldri n
Allyl chloride
gj Arseni c
B[a]P
Benzene
Benzidene
Beryl 1 ium
1,3-Butadiene
Cadmi um
Carbon tetrachloride
Chi ordane
CAS Number
107-13-1
1162-65-8
309-00-2
107-05-1
7440-38-2
50-32-8
71-43-2
92-87-5
7440-41-7
106-99-0
7440-43-9
56-23-5
57-74-9
Humans
L
L
I

S
I
S
S
L
I
L
I
I
Animals
S
S
L

I
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
L
Grouping
based on
IARC
criteria
2A
2A
2B

1
28
1
1
2A
2B
2A
2B
3
SI ope
(mg/kg/day)-l
0.24(W)
2900
11.4
1.19x10-2
15(H)
11.5
2.9xlO-2(W)
234(W)
2.6
1.0x10-1(1)
7.8(W)
1.30x10-1
1.61
Molecul ar
weight
53.1
312.3
369.4
76.5
149.8
252.3
78
184.2
9
54.1
112.4
153.8
409.8
Potency
i ndex
1x10+1
9xlO+5
4x10+3
9x10-1
2x10+3
3x10+3
2x100
4x10+4
2x10+1
5x100
9x10+2
2x10+1
7x10+2
Order of
magnitude
(Iog10
i ndex)
+1
+6
+4
0
+3
+3
0
+5
+1
+1
+3
+1
+3
= Sufficient evidence; L = Limited evidence;  I  =  Inadequate evidence.
                                                                                 (continued  on the following page)

-------
                                                   TABLE 14.  (continued)
CO
Level
of evidence3
Compounds CAS Number Humans
Chlorinated ethanes
1 ,2-dichl oroethane
hexachl oroethane
1 ,1,2,2-tetrachl oroethane
1 ,1 ,2-trichloroethane
Chloroform

107-06-2
67-72-1
79-34-5
79-00-5
67-66-3
Chromium 7440-47-3
DOT
Dichlorobenzidine
1 ,1-Di chl oroethyl ene
(Vinylidene chloride)
Di chl oromethane
(Methylene chloride)
Diel dri n
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
Diphenylhydrazi ne
Epichlorohydri n
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
50-29-3
91-94-1
75-35-4


75-09-2
60-57-1
121-14-2
122-66-7
106-89-8
111-44-4

I
I
I
I
I
S
I
I
I


I
I
I
I
I
I
Animal s

S
L
L
L
S
S
S
S
L


L
S
S
S
s
s
Groupi ng
based on
IARC
criteria

2B
3
3
3
2B
1
2B
28
3


3
2B
2B
2B
2B
28
Slope
(mg/kg/day)-l

6.9x10-2
1.42x10-2
0.20
5.73x10-2
7x10-2
41(W)
0.34
1.69
1.47x10-1(1)


6.3x10-4(1)
30.4
0.31
0.77
9.9x10-3
1.14
Molecular
weight

98.9
236.7
167.9
133.4
119.4
100
354.5
253.1
97


84.9
380.9
182
180
92.5
143
Potency
i ndex

7x100
3x100
3x10+1
8x100
8x100
4x10+3
1x10+2
4x10+2
1x10+1


5x10-2
1x10+4
6x10+1
1x10+2
9x10-1
2x10+2
Order of
magnitude
(Iog10
i ndex)

+1
0
+ 1
+ 1
+ 1
+4
+2
+3
+1


-1
+4
+2
+2
0
+2
      =  Sufficient  evidence;  L = Limited  evidence;  I  =  Inadequate  evidence.
                                                                                       (continued  on  the  following page)

-------
                                                 TABLE  14.   (continued)
Level
of evidence3
Compounds
Bi s(chl oromethyl )ether
Ethylene dibromide (EDB)
Ethylene oxide
Heptachlor
Hexachl orobenzene
CO
00 Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachl orocycl ohexane
technical grade
alpha isomer
beta isomer
gamma isomer
Hexachlorodibenzodioxin
Nickel
Nitrosami nes
Dimethyl nitrosami ne
Di ethyl nitrosami ne
Di butyl nitrosami ne
CAS Number
542-88-1
106-93-4
75-21-8
76-44-8
118-74-1
87-68-3
319-84-6
319-85-7
58-89-9
34465-46-8
7440-02-0
62-75-9
55-18-5
924-16-3
Humans
S
I
L
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
L
I
I
I
Animals
S
S
S
S
S
L
S
L
L
S
S
S
S
S
Grouping
based on
IARC
criteria
1
2B
2A
28
2B
3
2B
3
28
2B
2A
2B
2B
2B
Slope
(mg/kg/day)-l
9300(1)
41
3.5x10-1(1)
3.37
1.67
7.75x10-2
4.75
11.12
1.84
1.33
6.2x10+3
1.15(W)
25.9(not by ql
43.5(not by q^
5.43 J
Molecular
weight
115
187.9
44.1
373.3
284.4
261
290.9
290.9
290.9
290.9
391
58.7
p) 74.1
F) 102.1
158.2
Potency
index
1x10+6
8x10+3
2x10+1
1x10+3
5x10+2
2x10+1
1x10+3
3x10+3
5x10+2
4x10+2
2x10+6
7x10+1
2x10+3
4x10+3
9x10+2
Order of
magnitude
(Iog10
i ndex)
+6
+4
+1
+3
+3
+ 1
+3
+ 3
+ 3
+3
+6
+2
+3
+4
+3
as = Sufficient evidence; L = Limited evidence;  I  =  Inadequate evidence.
                                                                                   (continued on the following page)

-------
                                                TABLE  14.   (continued)
Compounds (
N-ni trosopyrrol i di ne
N-nitroso-N-ethylurea
N-nitroso-N-methyl urea
N-nitroso-diphenylamine
PCBs
Phenols
2,4,6-Tri chl orophenol
Tetrachl orodibenzo-
co p-dioxin (TCDD)
Tetrachl oroethylene
Toxaphene
Tri chl oroethyl ene
Vinyl chloride
Level
of evidence3
:AS Number
930-55-2
759-73-9
684-93-5
86-30-6
1336-36-3

88-06-2

1746-01-6
127-18-4
8001-35-2
79-01-6
75-01-4
Humans
I
I
I
I
I

I

I
I
I
I
S
Animals
S
S
S
S
S

S

S
L
S
L/S
S
Grouping
based on
I ARC
criteria
2B
2B
2B
2B
2B

2B

2B
3
2B
3/2B
1
Slope
(mg/kg/day)-1
2.13
32.9
302.6
4.92x10-3
4.34

1.99x10-2

1.56x10+5
6.0x10-2
1.13
1.2x10-2
1.75x10-2(1)
Molecular
wei ght
100.2
117.1
103.1
198
324

197.4

322
165.8
414
131.4
62.5
Potency
i ndex
2x10+2
4x10+3
3x10+4
1x100
1x10+3

4xlQO

5x10+7
IxlOl
5x10+2
2x100
1x100
Order of
magnitude
(Iog10
index)
+2
+4
+4
0
+3

+1

+8
+1
+3
0
0
aS = Sufficient evidence; L = Limited evidence;  I  =  Inadequate  evidence.

Remarks:
1.  Animal  slopes are 95% upper-limit slopes  based on  the  linearized  multistage model.  They are calculated based on
    animal  oral studies, except for those indicated  by I  (animal  inhalation), W (human occupational exposure), and H
    (human drinking water exposure).  Human slopes are point  estimates  based on the  linear  nonthreshold model.

2.  The potency index is a rounded-off slope  in  (mmol/kg/day)-l and  is  calculated  by multiplying the slopes in
    (mg/kg/day)-l by the molecular weight of  the compound.

3.  Not all of the carcinogenic potencies presented  in this table represent the same degree of  certainty.  All are
    subject to change as new evidence becomes available.

-------
                          DRAFT—DO NOT QUOTE  OR  CITE

provide sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity and  have  sufficient  exposure
i nformation.
     The potency index for 1,3-butadiene based on the  NTP  mouse  inhalation study
(NTP, 1984) is 5.4 (mmol /kg/day)'1.  This is derived as  follows:   the upper-limit
incremental unit risk estimate from the inhalation  study is  2.9  x  10~5 (yg/m3)-1.
Transforming this to mg/kg/day, the conversion factor  is

1 yg/m3 = 1 yg/m3 x 20 m3/day x 10'3 mg/yg x  1/70 kg = 2.86  x 10'4 mg/kg/day
Then
   = 2.9 x 1Q-5 (yg/m3)'1 x 2.86 x 10'4 mg/kg/day = 1.0 x 10'1 (mg/kg/day)'1
Multiplying by the molecular weight of 54.1 gives a potency index of 5.4 x 10°.
Rounding off to the nearest order of magnitude gives a value of 101, which is
the scale presented on the horizontal axis of Figure 2.  The index of 5.4 lies
at the top of the fourth quartile of the 54 chemicals that the CAG has evaluated
as suspect carcinogens.  Thus, in terms of potency alone, 1,3-butadiene would
place among the weakest of these carcinogens.  However, the fact that 1,3-buta-
diene causes so many fatal tumors in animals and sharply decreases the latency
period increases concern beyond that based simply on relative potency.
4.4.5.  Summary of Quantitative Estimation
     Based on the linearized multistage model, a 95% upper-limit incremental
unit risk was calculated for 1,3-butadiene using the geometric mean of the
95% upper-limit incremental risk estimates from the pooled male and pooled
female significant tumor responses of the NTP mouse study.  The mean value of
q^ = 6.5 x 10"2 (ppm)"1 was then used to predict human responses in several

                                       90

-------
                          DRAFT—DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE





epidemiologic studies, and the predicted and actual responses were then com-



pared.  The comparisons were hampered by a scarcity of information on the epi-



demiology concerning actual exposures, age distributions, and work histories.



In addition, because there was no consistent cancer response across all of



the studies, the most predominant response, cancer of the lymphatic and hemato-



poietic tissues, was chosen as being the target for 1,3-butadiene.  Based on



the comparisons between the predicted and observed human response, the extrapo-



lated value from the animal data appeared high by a factor of about 3, but in



view of the uncertainty and apparent inconsistency of the epidemiologic data,



no better estimate can be made at this time.



     In addition to a 95% upper-limit incremental unit risk, a measure of car-



cinogenic potency was determined for 1,3-butadiene.  Among the 54 chemicals



that the CAG has evaluated as suspected carcinogens, 1,3-butadiene ranks fairly



low in potency, placing at the top of the fourth quartile.  Based on  the wide



spectrum of cancers and sharply decreased latency associated with these cancers,



however, 1,3-butadiene should evoke much more concern  than the potency numbers



alone indicate.
                                       91

-------
                          DRAFT—DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE


                                   REFERENCES
Andjelkovich, D., J. Taulbee, and M. Symons.  1976.  Mortality experience of a
     cohort of rubber workers, 1964-1973.  J. Occup. Med. 18:387-394.

Andjelkovich, D., J. Taulbee, M. Symons, and T. Williams.  1977.  Mortality of
     rubber workers with reference to work experience.  J. Occup. Med. 18:387-
     394.

Beaumont, J.I. and N.E. Breslow.  1981.  Power consideration in epidemiologic
     studies of vinyl chloride workers.  American Journal of Epidemiology
     114:725-734.

Bolt, H.M., G. Schmiedel, J.G. Filser, H.P. Rolzhauser, K. Lieser, D.  Wistuba,
     and V. Schurig.  1983.  Biological activation of 1,3-butadiene to vinyl
     oxirane by rat liver microsomes and expiration of the reactive metabolites
     by exposed rats.  J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 106:112-116.

Carpenter, C., C. Shaffer, C. Weil, and H. Smith.  1944.  Studies on the
     inhalation of 1,3-butadiene; with a comparison of its narcotic effect
     with benzol, toluol, and styrene, and a note on the elimination of
     styrene by the human.  J. Ind. Hyg. Toxicol. 26:69-78.

Checkoway, H., and T.M. Williams.  1982.  A hematology survey of workers at a
     styrene-butadiene synthetic rubber manufacturing plant.   Am. Ind. Hyg.
     Assoc. J. 43:164-169.

Checkoway, H., T. Wilcosky, P. Wolf, and H. Tyroler.  1984.   An evaluation of
     the association of leukemia and rubber industry solvent exposures.  Am.
     J. Ind. Med. 5:239-249.

Conner, M., J. Luo, and 0. Gutierrez de Gotera.   1983.  Induction and rapid
     repair of sister-chromatid exchanges in multiple murine tissues in vitro
     by diepoxybutane.  Mutat. Res.  108:251-263.

Cox, C.R.  1972.   Regression model  and life tables.  J. Roy.  Stat. Soc. B
     34:187-220.

Crouch, C., D. Pullinger, and I.  Gaunt.  1979.   Inhalation toxicity studies
     with 1,3-butadiene, Part 2:   Three-month toxicity study  in rats.
     Am. Ind.  Hyg. Assoc. J. 40:796-802.

Crump,  K.S.  1979.  Dose-response problems in carcinogenesis.  Biometrics
     35:157-167.

Crump,  K.S., and  Watson, W.W.  1979.  GLOBAL79.   A FORTRAN program to extra-
     polate dichotomous animal  carcinogenicity  data to low dose.   Natl. Inst.
     of Environ.  Health Science Contract No.  l-ES-2123.

Crump,  K.S., Guess, H.A., and Deal, L.L.  1977.   Confidence  intervals and test
     of hypotheses concerning dose-response relations inferred  from animal
     carcinogenicity data.   Biometrics 33:437-451.


                                       92

-------
                          DRAFT—DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE


Crump, K.S., and R.B. Howe.  1983a.  The multistage model  with a time-dependent
     dose pattern: applications to carcinogenic risk assessment.  Unpublished
     report.  EPA Contract No. 68-01-3111.

Crump, K.S., and R.B. Howe.  1983b.  ADOLL1-83 and ADOLL2-83, FORTRAN programs
     for implementing a multistage model with a time-dependent dose pattern.
     Unpublished instructions for use of computer programs.

Dean, B.J., and G. Hodson-Walker.  1979.  An in vitro chromosome assay using
     cultured rat-liver cells.  Mutat. Res. 63T329-337.

de Meester, C., F. Poncelet, F. Roberfroid, and M. Mercier.  1978.   Mutage-
     nicity of butadiene and butadiene monoxide. Biochem.  Biophys.  Res.
     Commun. 80:298-305.

de Meester, C., F. Poncelet, F. Roberfroid, and M. Mercier.  1980.   The
     mutagenicity of butadiene towards Salmonella typhimurium.  Toxicol.
     Lett. 6:125-130.

Doll, R.  1971.  Weibull distribution of cancer.  Implications for  models  of
     carcinogenesis.  J. Roy. Statistical  Soc.  A 13:133-136.

Dripps, R.D., Eckenhoff, J.E., and Vandam, L.D.  1977.   Introduction  to
     anesthesia, the principles of safe practice.  5th  Ed.  W.B.  Saunders
     Company, Philadelphia, pp. 121-123.

Hazleton Laboratories Europe, Ltd.  1981a.  The toxicity and  carcinogenicity
     of butadiene gas administered to rats by inhalation for  approximately
     24 months.  Prepared for the International  Institute  of  Synthetic
     Rubber Producers, New York, NY.   (Unpublished).

Hazleton Laboratories Europe, Ltd.  1981b.  1,3-Butadiene:  Inhalation  terato-
     genicity study No. 2788 522/3.   Prepared for the International  Institute
     of Synthetic Rubber Producers,  New York, NY.  (Unpublished).

Hemminki, K., K. Falck, and H. Vainio.  1980.  Comparison  of  alkylation rates
     and mutagenicity of directly acting industrial  and laboratory  chemicals.
     Arch.  Toxicol . 46:277-285.

Huff, J.E., R.L. Melnick, H.A. Solleveld,  J.K.  Haseman,  M.  Powers,  and R.A.
     Miller.   1985.  Multiple organ carcinogenicity  of  1,3-butadiene  in B6C3F}
     mice after 60 weeks of inhalation exposure.  Science  227:548-549.

International  Agency for Research on  Cancer (IARC).   1982.  IARC monographs
     on  the evaluation of the carcinogenic risk  of chemicals  to humans.
     Supplement  4.   Lyon,  France.

Jersey,  G.,  M.  Balmer, J.  Quast,  C. Park,  D.  Schuetz, J. Beyer, K.  Olsen, S.
     McCollister,  and L. Rampy.   1978.   Two-year chronic inhalation toxicity
     and  carcinogenicity study of monomeric styrene  in  rats.   Final report.
     Dow  Chemical  Co., Midland,  MI.
                                       93

-------
                          DRAFT--DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE


 Lawley,  P.O., and  P. Brookes.  1967.  Interstrand cross-linking of DNA by
      difunctional  al'/lating agents.  J. Mol. Biol. 25:143-160.

 Lilis, R., and W.J. Nicholson.  1976.  Cancer experience among workers in a
      chemical plant producing styrene monomers.  Proceedings of Styrene-
      Butadiene Briefing, Covington, KY, April  30, 1976.  DHEW (NIOSH)  Pub.
      No.  77-129.   Cincinnati, OH, pp. 22-27.

 Linet, Martha S.   1985.  The leukemias:  epidemiologic aspects.  Oxford
      University Press, Oxford, England.

 Luker, M.A., and 8.J. Kilbey.  1982.  A simplified  method for the simulta-
      neous detection of intragenic and intergenic mutations  (deletions) in
      Neurospora crassa.  Mutat. Res. 92:63-68

 Malvoisin, E., G.  Lhoest, F. Poncelet, M.  Roberfroid,  and M. Mercier.   1979.
      Identification and quantitation of l,2-epoxybutene-3 as the primary
      metabolite of 1,3-butadiene.   J.  Chrom. 178:419-429.

 Malvoisin, E., and M. Roberfroid.   1982.  Hepatic microsomal  metabolism
      of 1,3-butadiene.  Xenobiotica 12:137-144.

 Mantel, N., and Schneiderman, M.A.  1975.   Estimating  "safe"  levels, a
      hazardous undertaking.   Cancer Res. 35:1379-1386.

 Matanoski, G.M., L. Schwartz, J.  Sperrazza,  and J.  Tonascia.   1982.  Mortality
      of workers in the styrene-butadiene rubber polymer manufacturing  industry.
      Johns Hopkins University School  of Hygiene and Public Health, Baltimore,
      MD.  (Unpublished).

 McMichael, A.J., R. Spirtas, J.F.  Gamble,  and  P.M.  Tousey.   1976.  Mortality
      among rubber workers:   Relationship to  specific jobs.   J.  Occup.  Med.
      18:178-185.

McMichael, A.J., R. Spirtas, and  L.L.  Kupper.   1974.  An  epidemiologic  study
     of mortality within a cohort  of  rubber  workers, 1964-72.   J. Occup.  Med.
      16:458-464.

McMichael, A.J., R. Spirtas, L.L.  Kupper,  and  J.F.  Gamble.   1975.  Solvent
     exposure and leukemia among  rubber  workers:  an epidemiologic study.
     J. Occup. Med. 17:234-239.

Meinhardt, T.J., R.A.  Lemen, M.S.  Crandall,  and  R.J. Young.   1982.  Environmental
     epidemiologic investigation of  the  styrene-butadiene rubber industry.  Scand,
     J. Work  Environ.  Health 8:250-259.

Monson, R.R.   1979.  U.S. death rates  programs,  versions  USDR 27 and USDR 38.
     Harvard  University  School  of  Public Health,  Boston,  MA.  (Unpublished).

National  Toxicology Program  (NTP).   1984.  Toxicology and carcinogenesis
     studies  of  1,3-butadiene (CAS  106-99-0) in  B6C3F1  mice  (inhalation
     studies).
                                      94

-------
                           DRAFT--DO  NOT  QUOTE OR CITE


 Olszewska,  E.,  and  B.J.  Kilbey.   1975.   The mutagenic activity of diepoxybu-
      tane  in yeast.  Mutat.  Res.  33:383-390.

 Ott,  M.G.,  R.C. Kolesar,  H.C.  Scharnweber, E.J. Schneider, and J.R. Venable.
      1980.  A mortality  survey of employees engaged in the development or
      manufacture of styrene-based products.  J. Occup. Med. 22(7):445-460.

 Perry,  P.,  and  H.J. Evans.   1975.  Cytological detection of mutagen-carcinogen
      exposure by sister  chromatid exchange.  Nature 258:121-125.

 Poncelet,  F., C. de Meester, M. Duverger-van Bogaert, M. Lambotte-Vandepaer,
      M.  Roberfroid, and  M. Mercier.  1980.  Influence of experimental  factors
      on  the mutagenicity  of  vinylic monomers.  Arch. Toxicol. Suppl . 4:63-66.

 Sankaranarayanan, K.  1983.  The effects of butylated hydroxytoluene on radi-
      ation  and  chemically-induced genetic damage in Drosophila melanogaster.
      Mutat. Res. 108:203-223.

 Sankaranarayanan, K., W.  Ferro, and J.A. Ziljlstra.  1983.  Studies on mutagen-
      sensitive  strains of Drosophila melanogaster.  III.  A comparison of the
      mutagenic  sensitivities of the ebony (UV and  X-ray sensitive)  and Canton-S
      (wild-type)  strains to  MMS, ENU, DEB, DEN, and 2,3,6-Cl3-PDMT.  Mutat.    ~
      Res. 110:59-70.

 Shugaev, B.  1969.   Concentrations of hydrocarbons in tissues as a  measure of
      toxicity.   Arch. Environ. Health 18:878-882.

 Spirtas, R.  1976.   Mortality among rubber workers: relationship to jobs  with
      styrene-butadiene exposures.  Proceedings of  NIOSH Styrene-Butadiene
      Briefing,  Covington, KY, April  30, 1976.   DREW (NIOSH)  Pub. No.  77-129.
      Cincinnati, OH, pp. 9-21.

 Taulbee, J., 0.  Adjelkovich, T. Williams, J.F. Gamble, and P. Wolf.  1976.
      A study of  possible associations between  exposure to SBR processes and
      mortality  from  leukemia and related diseases  based on toxicologic,
      industrial   hygiene and epidemiologic considerations (for workers  in
      the 1951 and 1964 cohorts and deaths 1964-1973).   Proceedings  of  NIOSH
      Styrene-Butadiene Briefing, Covington,  KY,  April  30, 1976.   DHEW  (NIOSH)
      Pub. No. 77-129.  Cincinnati, OH,  pp. 113-129.

 Vogel, E. 1976.   Mutagenicity of carcinogens  in  Drosophila as a  function  of
      genotype-controlled metabolism.   In:  F.J.  de  Serres, J.R.  Fouts,  J.R.
      Bend, and R.M. Philpot  (eds.).   In vitro  metabolic activation  in  muta-
      genesis testing, pp. 63-79.  Amsterdam  Elsevier/North-Holland  Biomedical
      Press.

 Voogd, C.E. J.J. van de Stel, and J.J.J.A.A. Jacobs.   1981.   The mutagenic
     action of aliphatic epoxides. Mutat. Res.  89:269-282.

Wade,  M.J., J.W. Moyer,  and C.H.  Hine.   1979.  Mutagenic  action  of  a series  of
     epoxides.  Mutat. Res. 66:367-371.
                                       95

-------
                          DRAFT--DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE


Zaborowska, D., Z. Swietlinska, and J. Zuk.  1983.  Induction of mitotic
     recombination by UV and diepoxybutane and its enhancement by hydroxyurea
     in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.  Mutat. Res. 120:21-26.

Zimmering, S.  1983.  The mei-9a test for chromosome loss in Drosophila:  A
     review of assays of 21 chemicals for chromosome breakage.  Environ.
     Mutagen. 5:907-921.
                          U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE-5bl
                                       96

-------