EPA-600/1-79-028
August 1979
EXPOSURE TO ASBESTOS FROM DRINKING WATER
IN THE UNITED STATES
by
James R. Millette
Patrick J. Clark
Michael F. Pansing
Exposure Evaluation Branch
Health Effects Research Laboratory
Cincinnati, Ohio 45268
HEALTH EFFECTS RESEARCH LABORATORY
OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
U. S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
CINCINNATI, OHIO 45268
-------
DISCLAIMER
This report has been reviewed by the Health Effects Research Laboratory,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and approved for publication. Mention
of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or
recommendation for use.
ii
-------
FOREWORD
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency was created in response to
increasing public concern about the dangers of pollution to the health and
welfare of the American people and their environment. The complexities of
environmental problems originate in the deep interdependent relationships
between the various physical and biological segments of man's natural and
social world. Solutions to these environmental problems require an integrated
program of research and development using input from a number of disciplines.
The Health Effects Research Laboratory was established to provide sound
health effects data in support of the regulatory activities of the EPA.
Evaluating man's exposure to environmental health hazards is a key segment in
developing such a data bank. Studies of exposure require identification,
characterization and quantification of physical, chemical, and biological
agents found in the environment. In addition, exposure assessment involves
the determination of conditions that cause agents to be released into the
environment, the study of the routes and pathways to man, and research into
the body's ability to prevent the entrance of environmental hazards.
This report presents an assessment of the exposure to the U.S. population
from asbestos in drinking water. Data for this evaluation were collected from
surveys of the scientific literature, in-house analyses, and the results of
work provided by analysts throughout the United States. An understanding of
the extent of asbestos in the drinking water of the country is important in
determining the potential health risk of ingested asbestos.
R. J. Garner
Director
Health Effects Research Laboratory
ill
-------
ABSTRACT
Over 1500 asbestos analyses of water supplies in 43 states, Puerto
Rico and the District of Columbia were evaluated in order to assess the
exposure of the United States population to asbestos in drinking water.
It was concluded that the large majority of U.S. water consumers are not
exposed to concentrations of asbestos fibers above one million fibers
per liter. In a few areas people are exposed to concentrations up to
one hundred million fibers per liter. The majority of persons receiving
water from asbestos-cement pipe distribution systems are not exposed to
significant number of fibers from the pipe. In areas of aggressive
water, however, water consumers using asbestos-cement mains may be
exposed to high concentrations of fibers.
This report presents data on the exposure to waterborne asbestos
fibers. Other projects are currently assessing the health effects of
ingested asbestos and will be described in later reports.
A listing of a computerized waterborne asbestos data base is in-
cluded as an Appendix.
IV
-------
CONTENTS
Foreword 11:L
Abstract iv
Tables yi
Abbreviations yii
Acknowledgments viii
1. Introduction 1
2. Conclusions 2
3. Recommendations 3
4. Methods for Measuring Asbestos in Water 4
Optical microscopy 4
Scanning electron microscopy 5
Transmission electron microscopy 6
5. Interlaboratory Comparisons 12
6. Other Considerations in Evaluating Asbestos Data 15
Contamination 15
Statistical significance 16
Definition and identification 16
7. Fiber Count to Mass Conversion 18
8. Assessment of Exposure 20
Lake Superior water supplies 20
Bay Area, California, water supplies 24
Pacific Northwest water supplies 25
Cisterns 25
New Mexico water supplies 26
Asbestos-cement pipe systems 26
Erosion of asbestos waste piles 29
Largest U.S. cities 29
Overall assessment 29
9. Exposure to Non-asbestos Fibers in Water 31
References 32
Appendices
A. Asbestos in water: mass data 37
B. Asbestos in water: fiber count data 39
v
-------
TABLES
Number Page
1 Comparison of Millipore Condensation Washing and Nuclepore Jaffe
Wick Techniques (Lab EPC) 9
2 Comparison of Millipore Condensation Washing and Nuclepore Jaffe
Wick Techniques (Lab UWA) 9
3 Comparison of Asbestos Results from Several Laboratories 12
4 Comparison of Asbestos Results from Labs EPG, EPD, and EPC 13
5 Comparison of Asbestos Results from Labs EPC and CMC 13
6 Comparison of Asbestos Results from Labs EPC and UCB 13
7 Relationship of Fiber and Mass Concentrations of Chrysotile
Asbestos in Water 18
8 Distribution of Reported Asbestos Concentrations in the
Drinking Water from 365 Cities in 43 States, Puerto Rico and
the District of Columbia 20
9 Drinking Waters Reported to have over Ten Million Asbestos
Fibers Per Liter 21
10 Drinking Waters Reported to Have Between One and Ten Million
Asbestos Fibers Per Liter 23
11 Representative Average U.S. Utility Aggressiveness Indices 27
12 Available Data on Asbestos in the Drinking Water of the 20
Largest U.S. Cities 30
VI
-------
ABBREVIATIONS
A.I. -- agressiveness index
ASTM -- American Society for Testing and Materials
CMC -- City of Chicago Water Department - Microscopy Unit,
Chicago, Illinois
DOW -- Dow Chemical Company, Midland Michigan
EDS -- Energy dispersive spectroscopy (x-ray analysis)
EPC -- Environmental Protection Agency Research Center,
Cincinnati, Ohio
EPD -- Environmental Protection Agency Research Laboratory,
Duluth, Minnesota
EPG -- Environmental Protection Agency Research Laboratory,
Athens, Georgia
JMR -- Johns-Mansville Research and Engineering Center
MCC -- McCrone Associates, Chicago, Illinois
MDH -- Minnesota Department of Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota
MFL -- Million Fibers per Liter
MSS -- Mount Sinai Hospital, New York City, New York
NMI -- New Mexico Institute of Mining, Socorro, New Mexico
SEM -- Scanning electron microscopy
TEM -- Transmission electron microscopy
UCB -- University of California, School of Public Health,
Berkeley, California
UIL -- University of Illinois, School of Public Health,
Chicago, Illinois
UMD -- University of Minnesota, Duluth, Minnesota
UWA -- University of Washington, Department of Environmental
Health, Seattle, Washington
WIS -- University of Wisconsin
vii
-------
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The authors wish to gratefully acknowledge the assistance of Arthur F.
Hammonds, Epidemiological Branch of the Health Effects Research Laboratory, in
designing the computer programs necessary for storing and retrieving the
waterborne asbestos analysis data.
The authors also wish to thank the following researchers who kindly sup-
plied data on asbestos concentrations determined in water supplies: L. Mc-
Millian, City of Chicago Water Department - Microscopy Unit, Chicago, Illi-
nois, P. M. Cook, U.S.E.P.A., Duluth, MN, C. Anderson and J. M. Long, U.S.E.P.A.
Athens, Georgia, E. Boatman, University of Washington, Seattle, J. Flickinger,
Wisconsin Power and Light Company, W. Hallenbeck, School of Public Health,
University of Illinois, R. Feldman and G. Logsdon, Drinking Water Research
Division, U.S.E.P.A., Cincinnati, OH, J. Murchio, University of California,
Berkeley, CA, and S. J. Greenwood, Minnesota Department of Health.
viii
-------
SECTION 1
INTRODUCTION
Since the detection of asbestos fibers in water supplies was reported in
1973,1'2 a great number of water samples from all over the U.S. have been
analyzed for asbestos. Many of these analytical results have been published
in various journal articles and agency reports. At least two publications,3'4
contain tables in which an attempt was made to gather a number of values from
the literature to summarize the asbestos concentrations present in surface
waters and public water supplies. In order to assess the exposure to the U.S.
population to asbestos from drinking water, however, it became apparent that a
complete data base was needed. It was important that the base listings con-
tained data about the method of analysis so an evaluation of the reliability
of the data could be made. It was also important that the listings included
asbestos results which while reported to an individual water utility or a
specific researcher were not described in the general literature. A comput-
erized waterborne asbestos data base of transmission electron microscopy
analyses which could be updated periodically was initiated by the Health
Effects Research Laboratory, USEPA-Cincinnati in 1978. A listing of the
current asbestos analysis data file arranged by state, city and date of sample
can be found in Appendix B. Data are also given as to the analyzing labora-
tory and type of method used to prepare the samples for asbestos analysis.
A number of factors influence the reliability of the asbestos counts on a
water sample. These factors are described in the following sections and their
influence in assessing the asbestos exposure to the U.S. from drinking water
is discussed.
The purpose of this paper is to provide a current assessment of exposure
to asbestos in drinking water. It is not within the scope of this report to
evaluate the health implications of ingested asbestos.
-------
SECTION 2
CONCLUSIONS
Based on the evaluation of the results of all available asbestos analyses
of water supplies it is concluded that the majority of U.S. water consumers
are not exposed to concentrations of asbestos fibers above one million fibers
per liter. In a few areas, the Bay Area of California and some systems in the
Pacific Northwest, some people are exposed to concentrations of asbestos
fibers between one and one hundred million fibers per liter.
The majority of persons receiving water from asbestos-cement pipe dis-
tribution systems are not exposed to significant numbers of fibers from the
pipe. Many residents using asbestos-cement pipe may be exposed to intermit-
tent amounts of asbestos fibers in their water if pipe tapping work is done
improperly. In areas of very aggressive water (estimated to be 16 percent of
the U.S. water utilities) consumers using asbestos-cement mains may be exposed
to high concentrations of fibers, over ten million fibers per liter.
Persons using water from cisterns where asbestos-cement tile roofing
material is used to collect the water are exposed to high concentrations of
fibers. Those using cisterns where the typical asphalt-asbestos shingles are
used are not exposed to asbestos in their water. The possible contribution of
asbestos containing paints and coatings to cisterns has not been studied.
All of the major water utilities using Lake Superior for a source have
now installed filtration plants and populations in the cities around the lake
are no longer exposed to significant fiber concentrations.
Storm erosion of asbestos waste piles may cause temporary high concen-
trations of asbestos in the water supply. Other than in the Duluth situation
no industrial discharges have been directly related to asbestos in the drink-
ing water.
More waterborne asbestos data is needed to provide a complete quantita-
tive assessment of exposure.
-------
SECTION 3
RECOMMENDATIONS
In order to better assess the exposure to asbestos in water in the
United States the following steps should be taken:
1. The adoption by all laboratories of a standardized technique for
analyzing asbestos in water.
2. The development of standard asbestos samples and a system by which
different laboratories could easily split samples and compare re-
sults.
3. The adoption of standardized reporting methods including the re-
reporting of blank data.
4. The development of a fuller understanding of which water quality
parameters are the most important in predicting whether asbestos
fibers would come off asbestos-cement pipe or not.
5. Further analyses of water supplies which are near mining, production
or waste piles of asbestos, especially over a period including
storms and other hydrological changes.
-------
SECTION 4
METHODS FOR MEASURING ASBESTOS IN WATER
A variety of methods and procedures have been developed for the analysis
of asbestos in water. Athough some x-ray methods have been employed,5 the
bulk of the asbestos concentrations in water supplies have been determined
using some form of microscopy.
OPTICAL MICROSCOPY
An early work6 in 1974 presented data on asbestos concentrations deter-
mined in Vermont water supplies by optical microscopy. The preparation and
analysis procedure used7 was an adaptation of the standard OSHA phase-contract
optical microscope technique for counting asbestos fibers in occupational air
samples.8 While this technique allowed fibers larger than 5 ym to be seen,
identification of the fibers as asbestos was not possible. Further work on
the Vermont samples using optical dispersion staining and transmission elec-
tron microscopy (TEM) showed that the fibers upon which the optical asbestos
concentrations were based were not, in fact, asbestos but fibers of biological
origin.9 The optical asbestos data in the 1974 report6 is therefore totally
inaccurate.
In one report10 presenting asbestos data determined by electron micro-
scopy it was indicated that no fibers were visible by optical microscopy in
the samples.
During 1975-76 a test was made of the optical microscope as a possible
screening tool for asbestos in water. The two laboratories involved were the
Connecticut State Department of Health with high proficiency and several years
experience in using the OSHA optical asbestos techniques and the USEPA labor-
atory in Cincinnati which had been analyzing water samples using transmission
electron microscopy (TEM). Several filters which had been determined by TEM
to contain substantial concentrations of asbestos fibers from asbestos-cement
pipe systems and filters with concentrations which were below detectable TEM
limits were sent to Connecticut with coded labels. The optical analyst
correctly differentiated between the filters which had fibers and those that
did not. A series of 101 Connecticut water samples were then split and ana-
lyzed by the two laboratories. The Connecticut State Department of Health
analyst examined the samples using a modified OSHA technique as described in
reference 7 with a further modification that the samples were ashed in a low
termperature asher to eliminate the majority of biological fibers. The opti-
cal analyst reported that no positively identified asbestos fibers were found
in any of the 101 samples. Four (4) samples contained possible asbestos
-------
fibers. The TEM analyst reported that 12 of the 101 samples had definite
asbestos concentrations but the asbestos fiber concentrations were determined
to be below detectable limits in 3 of the 4 samples in which the optical
analyses showed possible fibers. When the test was originally devised it was
anticipated that the Connecticut samples would provide a range of asbestos
concentrations from high to low loading. It became apparent by the end of
the test that all the Connecticut samples had low or no fiber concentrations.
In the 12 samples determined to have fiber concentrations by TEM, the fibers
found were all smaller than could be seen by the optical microscope. There-
fore, the results of the test cannot be considered conclusive. It is signi-
ficant only that the optical analyses did not show positive asbestos when the
TEM found none.
It has been suggested that polarized light microscopy with dispersion
staining would be useful in analyzing samples containing asbestos fibers
larger than 0.3 x 1.0 yrn but it is generally recognized that the asbestos
fibers in water are smaller than the resolving power of the light microscope
techniques.11 No optical data has been included in the waterborne asbestos
data base and none was used in assessing waterborne asbestos exposure to the
U.S.
For the quantitative determination of asbestos in drinking water the
optical microscope cannot provide accurate data.
SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY
Several reports12'13'14 have described asbestos analysis procedures for
environmental samples using the scanning electron microscope (SEM). Direct
comparisons between the SEM and TEM methods with samples of standard chryso-
tile fibers suggested that the SEM overlooked 30%14 to 50%15 of the total
number of chrysotile fibers counted by TEM. When actual water samples with
suspended amphiboles were used, the SEM overlooked 90% of the fibers counted
by the TEM.1" One group of asbestos analysts17 concluded that the SEM was not
as good as the TEM for asbestos measurement in water for the following reasons:
1. The SEM lacks the selected area electron diffraction capa-
bility for identification of fiber mineral type.
2. The SEM has an inferior imaging capability than the TEM
at 20,OOOX.
3. The SEM cannot image the central canal of chrysotile.
4. Searching sample areas at 20,OOOX is more fatiguing with
the SEM than TEM.
Other researchers18 feel that with the research now on-going in the area
of asbestos analysis by SEM-energy dispersive x-ray analysis (EDS), a standard
survey procedure using the SEM could be developed to provide data on the
presence of asbestos fibers in some environmental samples with confirmation by
TEM. Correlations between SEM and TEM analyses using standardized techniques
would have to be done.
-------
16
In addition to the data presented in Flickinger , only one paper pre-
senting waterborne asbestos concentrations determined by SEM was found in the
literature.19 Although particles in this study were examined at 10,OOOX, the
entire stud surface was searched at a magnification between 400 and 1000X. The
smaller asbestos fibers would not have been observed at the low magnification.
Therefore, although the data showed that no high concentrations of large fibers
were found in some drinking waters and surface sources in Tennessee, the data
were not considered to be comparable to the TEM data and were not included in
the computerized data base.
For the quantitative determination of asbestos in drinking water the SEM
has not yet been shown to provide accurate data.
TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY
There are a number of different sample preparation methods which have
been used by the various research laboratories. For discussion the preparation
procedures have been separated into the following classes.
1. Centrifuge method (C)
2. Rubout technique (R)
3. Double Nuclepore filter (B)
4. Drop Drying (D)
5. Millipore Condensation Washer (M)
6. Millipore Jaffe Wick (L)
7. Nuclepore Jaffe Wick (N)
8. Millipore Collapsed filter (E)
The identifying letter which follows each classification is the letter used in
the data base (Appendix II) to indicate the analysis method used for each
sample.
Centrifuge Method20'21
In one variation of this technique21 water is filtered through a membrane
filter, ashed at low termperatures and resuspended. The suspension is centri-
fuged onto a glass cover disc. The disc is dried and carbon-coated. Small
sections of the film holding the particles are floated in water and picked up
on electron microscope grids for TEM examination. Samples of Ontario, Canada
drinking water were analyzed by this technique and reported by Kay. 2 The
often quoted Lake Superior asbestos concentrations of 1-30 million fibers per
liter presented in the paper by Cook et al.5 were also the results of analyses
using this technique. Some comparison of the centrifugation technique and the
Nuclepore Jaffe technique can be found in a report of interlaboratory tests of
asbestos analyses.17 The total fiber counts using the centrifuge preparation
method were 1/3 to 1/30 of the total counts using the Nuclepore Jaffe techni-
que. While a number of Canadian waters were analyzed using some form of the
centrifuge technique, only a few samples from U.S. water supplies (Lake Superi-
or) were characterized using this method. The centrifuge technique is not
currently being used.
-------
Rubout Technique23»2tt
In this preparation method, the sample is filtered through a membrane
filter, ashed at low temperatures and dispersed by grinding or ultrasonic
action. The residue is then enmeshed in an organic film. Sections of film
are cut and transferred to electron microscope grids. Fibers are counted and
converted to a mass value on the basis of fiber size and the density of the
asbestos type found. Because the true particle size distribution is destroyed,
only a mass concentration can be determined. The rubout technique is not
currently used to characterize asbestos concentrations in water although it
has been used recently to estimate the amount of asbestos in an environmental
air sample.25 At least one researcher cites high particle losses as a serious
disadvantage.26 Data on the asbestos content in water supplies determined
using the rubout technique are given in Appendix A. Although the conversion
of fiber counts to mass values is discussed in Section 7, the validity of
using the conversion factors with data determined using the rubout method has
not been determined.
Drop Drying27 >28
In this technique a micropipette is used to place a sample drop of known
volumn on a coated grid. The water is allowed to evaporate leaving the .sus-
pended particulates on the grid. Fibers are counted in a number of grid
openings and fibers per liter are calculated by assuming that the drop covers
all or a known portion of the grid's surface. A concentration step using
centrifugation has been used.2^ One group of researchers have used a drop
procedure in which a water sample is filtered through a membrane filter (S.
Ring, Minn. Dept. Health, 1979, Private Communication). The filter is low
temperature ashed and a drop of the resuspended ultrasonically mixed ash is
put on a coated grid. The drop is dried under a heat lamp. A comparison
between grids prepared by the micropipette technique using this ashing step
and grids prepared using the Nuclepore Jaffe wick procedure has been presented
in reference 17. Results of both preparation techniques were presented for
one Duluth water sample. In this case, the results using both methods were
essentially the same.
Another researcher has published data on asbestos in water systems using
the drop technique directly from the sample without concentration.27'2^ Some
of the fiber counts reported by this researcher are extremely high values,
over 2 billion fibers per liter. Many of the fibers were very thin (0.006 ym
in diameter) and could not be accurately identified. Samples from some of the
same sites analyzed by the Nuclepore Jaffe technique did not show over a
million fibers per liter. No direct comparison tests have been made between
this non-concentrated drop technique and other techniques. Because the re-
sults have not been able to be reproduced, the data of reference 28 is con-
sidered of questionable value in assessing asbestos exposure to the U.S. from
drinking water. However, they are included in the computerized data base for
comparison.
-------
Double Nuclepore Filter3°> 31
In this method, the sample is filtered through a sequence of 0.8 ym and
0.2 or 0.1 ym pore size, polycarbonate Nuclepore filters. The filters are
coated with silicon monoxide and a small disc is transferred to an electron
microscope grid. The filter is dissolved by chloroform by wick action.
Fibers are counted and recorded on grids from both filters and fibers per
liter determined. In reference 31, some analytical results obtained using the
double nuclepore filter method are compared with results on the same samples
obtained using the Millipore condensation washer technique. The results for
all five samples agreed within a factor of two. The double nuclepore filter
technique is not currently being used to determine asbestos concentrations in
drinking water.
Millipore Condensation Washer9»32^33,34,35
In this preparation technique, the sample is filtered through a Millipore
filter. A small disc is cut from the filter and placed on a carbon coated
electron microscope grid. The filter is gently dissolved in a condensation
washer apparatus charged with acetone. Fibers per grid opening are determined
and fibers per liter calculated. An inter-laboratory comparison17 between
the Millipore condensation washer technique and the carbon-coated Nuclepore
Jaffe technique concluded that there were variable (0 to 84% between labora-
tories) and significant (mean = 30%) losses associated with samples containing
amphiboles. The results were lower (mean = 14%) and less variable when con-
densation washing was used to prepare samples containing chrysotile. Studies
by individual laboratories differ, apparently showing that the condensation
washer preparation technique is very operator dependent. The condensation
washer requires the careful regulation of the level of acetone condensation
near a point in the condenser at or just below the position of the grid so
that only acetone vapor dissolves the filter.
An indepth study by one laboratory involving 72 samples showed signifi-
cant losses when comparing the Millipore condensation washer with the Nucle-
pore Jaffe technique.36 However, according to studies by another laboratory,
losses involved with a well regulated condensation washer are low and good
precision (low variation) can be obtained.37 Results obtained by two lab-
oratories at different locations within the Environmental Protection Agency
using both the Millipore condensation washer and the Nuclepore Jaffe wick
procedures on the same samples showed that for amphiboles one laboratory had
close comparisons between the two preparation techniques while the other
laboratory did not.38 For chrysotile, both laboratories found the same con-
centration independent of the preparation method used.
Four laboratories which have provided a large amount of the data on
asbestos in water supplies using the condensation washer technique have data
which show low losses or good comparisons between the Millipore condensation
washer and the Nuclepore Jaffe procedure. One laboratory has developed a
method of loss correction.35
The comparisons between the Millipore condensation washing and Nuclepore
Jaffe wick procedure presented in Tables 1 and 2, show the best correlation
-------
TABLE 1. COMPARISON OF MILLIPORE CONDENSATION WASHING AND
NUCLEPORE JAFFE WICK TECNHIQUES (LAB EPC)
Sampleff
Asbestos Type
Millipore (MFL)
Nuclepore (MFL)
3
4
6
Al
A2
A3
A4
A5
37617
37471
36535
37512
37585
36433
37578
36501
36535
36580
37592
36570
36571
37503
Amphibole
Amphibole
Chrysotile
it
ii
ii
ii
n
n
n
it
Tl
II
II
II
II
II
It
II
II
It
II
120
48
50
19
4.5
6.1
2.1
.3
.4
.2
BO. 01**
0.4
BO. 01
0.2
NO. 16
BO. 01
BO. 01
0.16
0.09
0.08
0.1
NO. 05
140
58
60
23
8.0
5.3
2.6
.7
.35
N.15*
BO. 03
NO. 15
BO. 03
NO. 15
BO.l
BO. 03
BO. 03
NO. 5
NO. 15
NO. 15
NO. 15
BO. 03
* N - less than 5 fibers counted
** B - Below the detectable limits of 0.01
Variations in detectable limits and significant levels are due to
differences in the amount filtered.
TABLE 2. COMPARISON OF MILLIPORE CONDENSATION WASHING AND
NUCLEPORE JAFFE WICK TECHNIQUES (LAB UWA)
Sample*
Asbestos Type
Millipore (MFL)
Nuclepore (MFL)
174-MM-2200
174-CMM-2200
174-CC-2100
174-CC-2130
174-CC-2200
174-R-2120
161-MM-1200
161-MM-2100
161-FE-1200
161-CC-1200
161-CC-2100
Chrysotile
ii
n
ii
n
n
it
1 1
n
n
it
NO.
BO.
NO.
BO.
NO.
1.
NO.
BO.
BO.
BO.
NO.
03*
01**
04
03
01
9
01
01
01
01
01
(1
(1
(1
fiber)
fiber)
fiber)
NO.
NO.
BO.
0.
BO.
2.
BO.
NO.
NO.
NO.
BO.
07
07
03
71
07
2
14
03(1
03(1
03(1
03
fiber)
fiber)
fiber)
* N - less than 5 fibers counted
** B - below the detectable limits of 0.01
-------
when the concentrations are high. This is to be expected since the more
fibers that are counted, the more statistically valid the value Determined.
Because of the general acceptance of the Nuclepore Jaffe wick procedure,
the Millipore condensation washer technique is now used to analyze water sam-
ples for asbestos in only a few laboratories.
Nuclepore Jaffe Wick Technique2*+ > 3 2 5 3 9
In this technique, water is filtered through a Nuclepore filter. A
section of the filter is attached to a glass slide and a deposit of carbon is
evaporated onto the particulates and filter. A small section is cut and
placed on an electron microscope grid. The filter is dissolved using a modi-
fied Jaffe wick apparatus.^0 This technique is fairly straightforward and a
number of different laboratories analyzing the same sample have agreed on
fiber concentrations within a factor of two.17'38 An interlaboratory repro-
ducibility of 50% can be expected in relatively clean water samples unless the
concentration is low.17
The Nuclepore Jaffe wick technique is generally gaining acceptance as the
basis for a standard reference method for the analysis of asbestos in water by
electron microscopy. 32»lfl
Millipore Collapsed Filter'*2^3
In this technique a water sample is filtered through a Millipore filter.
The filter is dried and a section is cut and placed on a glass slide. The
filter is exposed for a short period of time to acetone vapors so that the
rough surface of the membrane filter smooths out. The filter is then carbon-
coated. A small section is cut and placed on a grid. The filter is dissolved
away in a Jaffe wick apparatus. Although this technique is presently being
used with the analysis of fibers in air by the National Institute of Occupa-
tional Safety and Health (NIOSH),1^ no data concerning asbestos in water
determined using the Millipore collapsed filter technique could be found.
APPRAISAL OF ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUES
Currently the instrument of choice for quantitative analysis of asbestos
in drinking water is the transmission electron microscope. Although optical
microscopy may be useful in examining asbestos plant air samples, a drinking
water sample might contain millions of small fibers which would go undetected
under optical analysis. Sample analyses done with the scanning electron
microscope have not been comparable to analyses done on the same samples using
TEM. Because of the problems in SEM with routinely resolving the very thin
fibers, the SEM counts are generally lower than those done with TEM.
Among the various sample preparation methods for TEM, the Nuclepore Jaffe
wick technique is the most reproducible between laboratories. Asbestos con-
centrations determined by this method should be considered reliable within a
factor of three. Asbestos concentration values determined using the Millipore
condensation washer and Millipore Jaffe wick techniques should be considered
reliable within a factor of five for chrysotile and a factor of 10 for amphi-
10
-------
bole. Data determined using the centrifuge method should be considered to be
low by a factor of from five to thirty times. It is difficult to assess the
reliability of the data determined using the rubout technique since in this
process fibers are broken up and many smaller fibers are created. Direct
counts made from the rubout would not be reliable. The reliabilities of data
generated using the drop drying or Millipore collapsed filter technique have
not been fully assessed. The very high values reported by a researcher using
the non-concentrated direct drop drying method are in question.
The influence on reliability of differing sample collection, preser-
vation, and low temperature ashing procedures between laboratories has not
been fully addressed.
11
-------
SECTION 5
INTERLABORATORY COMPARISONS
Consideration of the results of split sample analyses performed by dif-
ferent laboratories is important in assessing the comparability and relia-
bility of the asbestos data which has been generated. In an early split-
sample study,45 six laboratories showed considerable variation concerning the
amphibole fiber concentration in water. Important causes of the variation
were differences in sample preparation and the definition of amphibole fiber.
Three laboratories in the study with similar preparation techniques and de-
finitions of amphibole fiber had much less variation between them.
An (ASTM) American Society for Testing and Materials interlaboratory
comparison17 provided better data on reproducibility of asbestos analyses
between laboratories since in some tests all laboratories used the same method.
The ASTM group concluded that the mean fiber concentrations by different
groups could agree within a factor of two when the Nuclepore Jaffe Wick tech-
nique was used. Several laboratories which have published or provided water-
borne asbestos data that has been included in the computerized data base par-
ticipated in the ASTM comparison. Therefore some data comparing the results
of the following laboratories: EPA, Cincinnati (EPC), EPA, Duluth (EPD), EPA,
Athens, Georgia (EPG), McCrone Associates (MCC), Dow Chemical (DOW), Mt. Sinai
Hospital, New York (MSS), and the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH), are
included in Table 3.
TABLE 3. COMPARISON OF ASBESTOS RESULTS FROM SEVERAL LABORATORIES17
(NUCLEPORE JAFFE WICK)
Sample
Type
Chrysotile
ti
1!
1!
IT
ii
Amphibole
ii
ii
Number
of Labs
Reporting
10
9
11
9
9
3
11
4
14
Mean Fiber
Concentration
MFL (millions of
asbestos fibers/1)
877
119
59
31
28
25
139
95
36
Precision
Relative
Standard
Deviation
35%
43%
41%
65%
32%
35%
50%
52%
66%
12
-------
A comparison of results obtained on the same samples by the three EPA
laboratories using the Nuclepore technique is given in the following table.
TABLE 4. COMPARISON OF ASBESTOS RESULTS FROM LABS EPG, EPD, AND EPC38
(VALUES IN MILLIONS OF FIBERS PER LITER)
Sample
Asbestos Type
Lab A
Lab B
Lab C
1
2
3
4
5
6
Amphibole
Amphibole
Amphibole
Amphibole
Chrysotile
Chrysotile
137
86
130
44
29
66
150
92
220
58
14
58
140
58
60
Some other split-sample analysis results are presented in Tables 5, and
6.
TABLE 5. COMPARISON OF ASBESTOS RESULTS FROM LABS EPC AND CMC.
SAMPLES COLLECTED 3/3/75. MILLIPORE CONDENSATION
WASHING TECHNIQUE USED. (VALUES IN MILLIONS OF FIBERS
PER LITER).
Sample
Asbestos Type
EPC
CMC
Raw Water
Finished Water
Distributed Water
Chrysotile
u
II
2.76
0.38
0.12
2.05
0.31
0.32
TABLE 6. COMPARISON OF ASBESTOS RESULTS FROM LABS EPC AND UCB.
SAMPLES COLLECTED 2/77. MILLIPORE CONDENSATION
WASHING TECHNIQUE USED. (VALUES IN MILLIONS OF FIBERS
PER LITER).
Samp1e
Asbestos Type
EPC
UCB
4815
4816
4817
Chrysotile
1!
II
1.5
0.5
1.0
1.9
0.4
0.1
Laboratories EPC and UWA each analyzed half of a filter containing a
standard dispersion of fibers using the Nuclepore Jaffe Wick techniques of
preparation. Lab EPC found 510 million fibers per liter and Lab UWA found
870 million fibers per liter.
13
-------
Plans for other split sample analyses are underway. Interested labor-
atories should contact the first author.
Split sample results of some type exist for twelve of the fifteen labor-
atories whose waterborne asbestos data has been considered. In general com-
parisons between laboratories are within a factor of 10, especially when the
same method was used.
14
-------
SECTION 6
OTHER CONSIDERATIONS IN EVALUATING ASBESTOS DATA
In addition to considering differences between methods and laboratories'
the areas of contamination, counting statistics, and fiber identification must
be considered when evaluating the various reports of asbestos concentrations
in water supplies.
CONTAMINATION
Because asbestos is used in many everyday products, the problems of
contamination of water samples must be considered. A sample may be contam-
inated during collection as was suggested in the case of a sample of distri-
bution water collected at an asbestos-cement sheet plant in New Orleans on
12/5/75. The fiber concentration of the sample was determined to be "too
numerous to count" (many millions of fibers). However, four samples analyzed
on previous days from the same site showed low or below detectable limits of
fibers. It was concluded by the analyzing laboratory that the high fiber
concentration in the 12/5/75 sample was most probably the result of contam-
ination from the asbestos plant. Distribution samples from Erie, Pennsylvania
and Marshville, North Carolina collected at asbestos plants showed wide vari-
ations in asbestos concentrations. It is suspected that some of the water
samples were contaminated from the asbestos plant air, causing the vari-
ation. In view of these problems the distribution system asbestos concen-
trations determined for St. Louis, Missouri and Van Buren, Arkansas must be
considered uncertain since the samples were also collected at asbestos plants.
Contamination from the air within a laboratory or cross-contamination
between samples must also be considered. All laboratories surveyed followed
procedures of rinsing all equipment, glassware, etc., with filtered distilled
water and had data to show that the area in which the samples were prepared
posed no significant contamination problems. Most laboratories ran blank sam-
ples with each group of analyses. In general, the contamination levels re-
ported by researchers whose data is listed in the computerized data base were
sporatic but low. These levels may cause some uncertainty in the fiber con-
centrations under one million fibers per liter unless blank analysis values were
reported along with the sample analysis data. Later data (post-1975) should
be considered less affected since the problems of contamination were more
seriously considered. It is apparent that all fiber count data should be
reported with blank values and steps are being undertaken to include this data
in the computerized data base.
15
-------
STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE
Even without the problems of possible contamination one cannot have a
great deal of confidence in a fiber concentration determined on the basis of
one fiber counted. Because electron microscope magnifications over 10,OOOX
must be used to search for asbestos fibers in a water sample, only a rela-
tively small portion of the sample is examined. In some cases one fiber found
in TEM asbestos analyses may correspond to 50,000 fibers per liter. Several
researchers have considered the problems of statistical significance in fiber
counts.36'^6'47 The most reasonable approach would appear to be the deter-
mination of 95% confidence intervals as described in reference 36. The con-
fidence intervals provide a range within which the actual fiber concentration
has a high likelihood of being found. No waterborne asbestos data which
included confidence intervals were found in the literature prior to 1979,
however, several laboratories are currently incorporating the statistical
procedure into their reporting of data.
The distribution of fibers on a filter can be described in terms of the
Poisson distribution. Theoretical considerations of the characteristics of a
Poisson distribution suggest that if 100 fibers are counted, the range between
the upper and lower confidence limits will be small in relationship to the
concentration value determined. Unfortunately, in many samples it is impos-
sible to search long enough to find 100 fibers. When the total fiber count is
less than 5 fibers, the statistics are particularly poor. The upper and lower
confidence limits are about _+ 100%. The lower limit therefore includes the
zero (0) concentration. Because of the high statistical variation associated
with fiber counts under 5 fibers, concentration values determined on the basis
of less than 5 fibers counted are listed in the computerized data base pre-
ceded with an "N". These values, while evidence that asbestos was present in
the sample, are considered not statistically significant. They were not given
much weight in the assessment of exposure to the U.S. population from drinking
water.
DEFINITION AND IDENTIFICATION
Entire symposia1*8'1*9 have been devoted to discussions concerning the
definitions of fiber and asbestos fiber. The general rule used by analysts
providing data that has been included in the computerized data base defines a
fiber as any particle that has parallel sides and a length/width ratio greater
than or equal to 3:1. Other definitions, aspect ratios of 5:1 or 10:1 or
20:1, have been suggested but until a standard definition is agreed upon most
researchers feel that data should be collected on all fibers. Size data has
been collected with most fiber count analyses and if necessary the concen-
trations could be reevaluated in terms of a standard aspect ratio different
from 3:1.
Identification of asbestos fibers as chrysotile or amphibole is made by
reference to standard asbestos fibers on the basis of morphology, electron
diffraction and in some cases, x-ray elemental analysis. The identification
of chrysotile is fairly straightforward because the fibrils generally show a
tubular structure with a hollow canal and often a distinctive diffraction
pattern. The identification of fibers as amphibole is generally based on
16
-------
morphology and visual recognition of the electron diffraction pattern in the
electron microscope.26'32 Visual identification of amphibole patterns on the
microscope screen is subjective in nature and the possibility for misidenti-
fication exists.50 Fortunately amphibole fibers have not been found in a
large number of water supplies. In the three areas where amphiboles have been
found more than once in sampling, Lake Superior, the Pacific Northwest, and
some systems with asbestos-cement pipe, the presence of amphibole has been
confirmed by energy dispersive x-ray analysis, careful measurements on photo-
graphs of electron diffraction patterns, and/or x-ray diffraction.
The problems of identification of asbestos fibers in water samples may
cause the asbestos concentrations determined to be understatements of the
actual asbestos fiber concentrations.
17
-------
SECTION 7
FIBER COUNT TO MASS CONVERSION
No acceptable procedure exists for determining the mass of asbestos in a
water sample directly. A mass value for a sample is computed using data on
the fiber concentration, the lengths and widths of the fibers observed, and
the density of the asbestos type involved. Examples of the equations used to
calculate mass can be found in reference 32.
One report22 suggests that a million chrysotile fibers in a natural water
sample corresponds to between 0.0002 and 0.002 yg. A million chrysotile
fibers from asbestos-cement cooling tower panel erosion has been estimated to
weigh from 0.01 to 0.2 yg.3 The differences between conversion factors in the
two reports illustrates the fact that fibers from different types of sources
have different average fiber length and diameter characteristics. Fibers from
the natural erosion of serpentine rock tend to be shorter and of smaller
diameter than those eroded from products containing commercial asbestos. Some
average conversion factors are given in Table 7.
TABLE 7. RELATIONSHIP OF FIBER AND MASS CONCENTRATIONS OF
CHRYSOTILE ASBESTOS IN WATER.
Average Mass Concentration
Fiber Source of 106 f/liter
Natural erosion of serpentine rock 0.002 yg/1
(shorter fibrils)
A/C pipe (longer fibers) 0.01 yg/1
Contributions from commerical dump site runoff 0.05 yg/1
and untreated discharge (more fiber bundles)
Conversion factors for amphibole fiber in Lake Superior water average
approximately 0.2 yg/1 for each 106 fibers per liter.
Using the average conversion factors given in Table 7, the mass concen-
trations of asbestos in the drinking water samples listed in Appendix B (ex-
cluding raw and effluent samples) range from below lO"1* yg/1 to above 5 yg/1.
Using the conversion factor of 0.005 yg/1 per 106 fibers per liter to
convert from mass to fiber count, the estimated fiber concentrations for the
18
-------
mass values in Appendix A range from 0.16 to 340 MFL. The sample with the
highest concentration (Memphis, Tennessee, 1.69 yg/1) was collected from a
point in a non-asbestos distribution line. This city has been resampled and
analyzed using the Nuclepore Jaffe wick technique. Samples from the source and
the non-asbestos cement pipe distribution line were below detectable limits
(below 0.02 MFL). A sample collected after a length of asbestos-cement pipe
showed a concentration of 0.4 MFL, 0.002 yg/1 of asbestos fiber. The dif-
ference between the two results suggest either an elimination of the asbestos
problem since the first sampling or possible contamination in the original
analysis.
Although many chemical water parameters are reported in terms of mass per
liter, asbestos does not lend itself to be accurately quantified on the basis
of mass. For example, if two samples each containing one million small fibers
per liter are analyzed, the sample in which a large fiber (20 ym long by 5.0 jam
wide) is found may have several times the calculated mass value of the other.
Since each fiber is thought to be capable of acting as an independent agent as
is a molecule of a chemical contaminant, it would seem most reasonable to
consider asbestos concentrations in terms of fibers per liter. If a water were
reported to contain 0.03 yg/1, it might have a concentration of 1,000 active
agents per liter (average fiber size 5 ym long by 1.7 ym wide) or 16,000,000
active agents per liter (average fiber size 1.0 ym long by 0.03 ym wide).
Most asbestos in water supply data is now being reported in terms of fiber
count. If necessary, mass values could be computed from the count and fiber
size data.
19
-------
SECTION 8
ASSESSMENT OF EXPOSURE
Over 1500 individual sample results determined by fifteen different
laboratories were evaluated in assessing the exposure to the U.S. population
from asbestos in drinking water. Some city water supplies such as the supply
at Duluth, Minnesota have had a number of water samples analyzed for asbestos.
As of February 1, 1979, 365 different cities or water supplies were repre-
sented by at least one analysis. A summary of the data on these 365 cities is
presented in Table 8.
TABLE 8. DISTRIBUTION OF REPORTED ASBESTOS CONCENTRATIONS
IN DRINKING WATER FROM 365 CITIES IN 43 STATES,
PUERTO RICO AND THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.
Asbestos Concentration
(106 fibers/1)
Below detectable limits
Not Statistically Significant
Less than 1
1-10
Greater than 10
Total
Number of
Cities
110
90
90
34
41
365
Percentage
of Samples
30.1
24.6
24.6
9.3
11.2
99.8
Of the 365 cities, 165 or 45.3% were reported to have significant con-
centrations of asbestos fibers in the drinking water. In an effort to provide
the most complete listing of waterborne asbestos data, Appendix II was updated
to contain all data received up to the time this manuscript was sent to the
printers. Appendix II therefore contains data on more cities than the 365
summarized in Table 8.
Tables 9 and 10 present data on the cities in which asbestos concentra-
tions of over one million fibers per liter were reported. An evaluation
of the reliability of the data was made on the basis of the areas described
in the previous sections.
LAKE SUPERIOR WATER SUPPLIES
Samples of drinking water prior to 1977 from Duluth, Minnesota have been
found to contain amphibole fiber concentrations up to 644 million fibers per
liter. Several analyses by different laboratories have shown fiber concen-
trations over 100 MFL. After the filtration plant began operation in 1977
20
-------
TABLE 9. DRINKING WATERS REPORTED TO HAVE OVER 10 MILLION ASBESTOS FIBERS PER LITER.
Reported
City Concentration (MFL)
Duluth, MN
Beaver Bay, MN
Two Harbors, MN
San Francisco, CA
(and cities within the
Bay Area)
Seattle (Tolt), WA
Everett, WA
St. Croix (Cistern), VI
Socorro, NM
Algodones, NM
Pojoaque, NM
Santa Fe, NM
Bishopville, SC
Kentucky Dam Village, KY
Pensacola, FL
Lakeland, FL
Paint, PA
Amherst, MA
Farmington, CT
Danville, KY
up to 644
up to 92
up to 200
up to 130
up to 25
up to 143
up to 543
up to 2000
up to 710
up to 194
up to 100
up to 547
up to 45
up to 32
up to 16
up to 19
up to 190
up to 10.2
up to 74
Probable Source
Mining processing
discharge
it ii
1! II
Natural erosion of
serpentine rock
Natural erosion
M II
Asbestos -cement
roof
Unknown
ii
ii
it
Asbestos- cement
pipe
M It
II II
II II
II II
Asbestos -cement
pipe tapping
M M
Erosion of waste
Notes
Drinking water levels now below 1 MFL
ii ii M
n n n n
Studies to reduce turbidity underway
Pilot filtration plant
n it n
Approx. 5 buildings on
this type of system
in operation
M n
the island use
Values questionable. Could not be re-
produced
Aggressive water
n n
Current levels below 2
MFL
H2S attack on pipe, corrective studies
underway
Aggressive water
Low concentrations in
high in hydrants
Resampling showed much
tion
System being resampled
the system, but
lower concentra
Atlanta, GA
Intermittent
pile
Possible storm
caused erosion
Samples analyzed by other labs showed
no asbestos
-------
City
Philadelphia, PA
Erie, PA
Marshvilie
Van Buren
Reported
Concentration (MFL)
Intermittent
(160)
(88)
(40)
Probable Source
Possible storm
caused erosion
Contamination of
sample
Notes
Resampling showed low asbestos concen-
trations
City distribution sample taken at as-
bestos plant
N>
N)
-------
TABLE 10. DRINKING WATERS REPORTED TO HAVE BETWEEN 1 AND 10 MILLION ASBESTOS FIBERS PER LITER
City
Albuquerque, NM
Bay City, MI
Iron River, MI
Cheyene, WY
Middlebury, CT
Newtown, CT
Sprague, CT
Greenwood, SC
Newport, RI
North Troy, VT
Reported
Concentration (MFL)
3
1.2
4.0
1.2
1.4
1.4
1.8
3.1
1.0
2.2
San Francisco, CA up to 9
(and cities within the
Bay Area)
Levinworth, WA 4.1
Superior, WI 4.0
Harrodsburg, KY 6.0
St. Louis, MO 4.9
Weaverville, CA 4.5
Ashland, WI 1.0
Probable Source
Unknown
Erosion
I!
Unknown
Reservoir
Asbestos-cement
pipe
Unknown
Erosion of natural
serpentine
Erosion of natural
serpentine and
some A/C pipe
Erosion
Mining processing
discharge
Erosion
Unknown
Natural erosion
Mining processing
discharge
Notes
Aggressive water
Possible sample contamination, sample
taken at asbestos plant
Lake Superior Source
-------
fiber concentrations in the drinking water dropped considerably. Recent data
suggests that the fiber concentrations in Duluth drinking water are now below
0.1 MFL and often below 0.01 MFL. The source of mineral fibers in Lake Su-
perior, the water supply for Duluth and other cities is related to a mining
processing discharge. The main discharge of fibrous amphiboles into Lake
Superior began about 1956 but it may have taken years for the fibers to mi-
grate south in the Lake currents to Duluth. Concentrations of fibers in the
raw lake water are known to vary with weather conditions. Storms on the lake
resuspend settled fibers from the lake sediments and result in high concen-
trations of amphibole in the water. It is estimated that Duluthian residents
were exposed to concentrations of amphibole fibers from 30-300 MFL for a
period of about 17 years, from about 1960 to 1977.
Several other water supplies around Lake Superior have been tested for
amphibole fibers. In Minnesota, the cities of Beaver Bay and Two Harbors were
shown to have significant fiber concentrations in their drinking water while
Grand Marais and Silver Bay did not have high concentrations. Counts as high
as 92 MFL were reported from Beaver Bay. It is estimated that Beaver Bay
residents were exposed to concentrations of amphibole fibers as high or higher
than Duluth residents since Beaver Bay is much closer to the discharge than
Duluth. A filtration plant will begin operation in 1979.
Two Harbors is located on the western arm of Lake Superior midway between
Beaver Bay and Duluth. Fiber counts as high as 200 MFL have been reported
before the filtration plant started operation in 1978. It is estimated that
the residents of Two Harbors were exposed to concentrations of amphibole
fibers as high or higher than the residents of Duluth.
The water supplies of Ontonagon, Eagle Harbor, and Marquette, Michigan
were not found to contain high concentrations of amphibole fibers.
In Wisconsin, amphibole fiber concentrations about 1 MFL have been
reported for Ashland and Superior. Later data for Ashland shows amphibole
fiber counts to be below detectable limits.
There are no data to indicate that any population around Lake Superior
except Beaver Bay is currently ingesting significant concentrations of as-
bestos fibers.
BAY AREA, CALIFORNIA WATER SUPPLIES
One sample of finished water from the Lake Crystal Reservoir in San
Francisco was reported to contain 130 MFL of chrysotile asbestos. Two other
Bay Area reservoirs had raw concentrations over 100 MFL. Sixteen (16) fin-
ished water systems in the Bay Area had chrysotile concentrations over 10 MFL;
17 others had concentrations between 1 and 10 MFL. Although some asbestos-
cement pipe may be involved, the primary source of asbestos in San Francisco
water is apparently the erosion of serpentine rock formations. Water supplies
for the Bay Area have been associated with serpentine mineral formations for
many years. It is probable that some residents of the San Francisco area have
been exposed to chrysotile asbestos fiber in their drinking water for over 40
years. The concentrations of fibers vary from water system to water system
24
-------
and undoubtably fluctuate with hydrological conditions. Studies are ongoing in
the San Francisco area to better assess past exposure to asbestos in water.
Water treatment practices are being optimized to reduce fiber concentrations
where they have been found.
PACIFIC NORTHWEST WATER SUPPLIES
Several samples of water from Everett, Washington were shown to contain
over 100 MFL of chrysotile by two laboratories. Amphibole asbestos fibers were
also found in the samples. The source of the fibers is probably natural
erosion into the reservoir water supply. Residents of Everett have probably
been exposed to varying concentrations of asbestos fibers in their drinking
water over the last 50 years. Chrysotile fiber concentrations up to 25 MFL
have been reported in the Tolt River water supply of Seattle. The fibers are
apparently also a product of natural erosion. Some residents of Seattle have
probably been exposed to asbestos fibers in their drinking water for the past
14 years. Studies are ongoing in the Seattle-Everett area to better assess
past exposure to asbestos in drinking water. Pilot filtration plants for the
Tolt River supply and for Everett are in operation.51
CISTERNS
Cisterns in St. Croix, Virgin Islands which collect drinking water from
asbestos-tile type roofing material have been shown to contain up to 543 MFL of
chrysotile asbestos. Only five buildings on the island are known to have such
a system but other similar arrangements for water supply are known to exist on
St. Thomas Island, Virgin Islands. These have not been sampled. Rainwater
collected from a "life-time asbestos roof" on a house in Kentucky showed con-
centrations of 360 MFL chrysotile. Although some rainwater has been shown to
contain one million asbestos fibers, per liter,52 the concentrations from the
asbestos-tile roofs are much higher.
Water samples from two cisterns which receive water from the more typical
asphalt asbestos roofing shingles were also tested. One system in Kentucky had
an old set of shingles (30 years) while the other in Ohio had fairly new
shingles (2 years). No asbestos fibers were found in either sample. Appar-
ently the asphalt binds the fibers well enough to prevent significant numbers
from coming off into the water supply.
It is apparent that persons using cisterns which collect drinking water
from asbestos-tile type roofing material may be exposed to high concentrations
of waterborne asbestos. Persons using cisterns which receive water from the
more typical asphalt asbestos roofing shingles are not exposed to significant
concentrations of asbestos in their drinking water. The extent of the U.S.
population using cisterns which have asbestos-tile type roofs has not been
determined. The total population using cisterns is thought to be less than 1
percent of all U.S. water consumers. Concentrations of asbestos in cisterns
where water is collected from roofs which have been painted or coated with an
asbestos containing material have not been studied as yet.
25
-------
NEW MEXICO WATER SUPPLIES
Samples of Socorro, New Mexico have been reported to contain up to 2190
MFL of chrysotile. Three other New Mexico water supplies, Algodones, Pojoa-
que, and Santa Fe have been reported to contain over 100 MFL by the same
researchers. Two billion fibers per liter is by far the highest concentration
of asbestos fibers in drinking water reported by any analyst. The source of
the fibers is unclear. The report states that there are no known asbestos
deposits in the area and suggests that the fibers in the well source are a
result of long distance, random migration of asbestos fibers in the ground-
water. Resampling was done and the water analyzed using another more accepted
preparation technique (See Section 4) by another laboratory. The greatest
concentration found among 4 sites sampled was 0.6 MFL. Two wells in use when
the first samples had been taken had been discontinued by the time of the
second sampling. Regardless of whether the first high concentrations were
related to the two discontinued wells or were the result of method inaccura-
cies or contamination, it is apparent that the population of Socorro is not
now exposed to high concentrations of asbestos in their drinking water.
ASBESTOS-CEMENT PIPE SYSTEMS
One sample of water collected in an asbestos cement (A/C) pipe distribu-
tion system in Bishopville, South Carolina contained over 500 MFL of chryso-
tile. Drinking water in other asbestos-cement pipe systems, Pensacola, Flor-
ida, Kentucky Dam Village, Kentucky, Lakeland, Florida, Paint, Pennsylvania,
and Greenwood, South Carolina have been shown to contain significant concen-
trations of chrysotile asbestos. Some amphibole asbestos fibers have also
been found in A/C pipe systems. While it is estimated that some 200,000 miles
of A/C pipe are in use in the United States,53 it is also apparent that not
all A/C pipe sheds fibers into the water. The quality of the water trans-
ported by the pipe is known to be a critical parameter in the release of
fibers from the pipe.
The corrosive effects of certain water on A/C pipe have been studied by
the Asbestos Cement Pipe Industry and an equation which gives an indication of
whether a water is aggressive or not has been derived from the Langlier Sat-
uration Index.54 The Aggressiveness Index (A.I.) is given in the American
Water Works Association (AWWA) Standard C402-77 for A/C transmission and
pressure pipe.55
The aggressiveness of water transported through a pipe, within the tem-
perature range of 40-80°F, is determined by the formula:
A.I. = pH + Iog10 (A x H) (1)
where pH = index of acidity or alkalinity of the water in standard pH units
A = total alkalinity in mg/1 as CaC03
H = calcium hardness in mg/1 as CaC03
Higher values of this aggressiveness index are less corrosive than lower
values. Water with an A.I. less than 10 is considered very aggressive to all
26
-------
types of pipe while A.I.'s greater than 12 are considered essentially non-
aggressive. The recommendations of AWWA Standard C402-77 are:
(a) where A.I. > 12.0, use either Type I (not autoclaved) or
Type II (autoclaved) pipe.
(b) where A.I. > 10, use Type II
(c) where A.I. < 10, consult the manufacturer.
The relationship between water aggressiveness and possible fiber release
has been studied by the Environmental Protection Agency on asbestos-cement
pipe distribution systems in the field. In one study56 water was sampled and
analyzed over a year period from five asbestos-cement pipe systems. Signifi-
cant numbers of fibers were present in the water from the two systems which
had source A.I.'s under 10.0, but few, if any, fibers could be found in water
samples from 3 systems with source A.I.'s > 12.0.
Sampling of representative utilities throughout the United States has
indicated that over half of the supplies had water which was at least moder-
ately aggressive range (10 < A.I. < 12) and sixteen percent had very aggres-
sive water (Table II).57
TABLE 11. REPRESENTATIVE AVERAGE U.S. UTILITY AGGRESSIVENESS INDICES
Highly aggressive (A.I. < 10) = 16.5 percent
Moderately aggressive (10 < A.I. < 12) = 52 percent
Nonaggressive (A.I. > 12) = 31.5 percent
This data would suggest that as many as 68.5 percent of U.S. water systems
carry water which is potentially capable of eroding asbestos-cement Type I
pipe. The water supplies with very aggressive waters (i.e. 16.5 percent of
U.S. water systems) may have significant corrosion problems with any type of
pipe used including cast iron, galvanized, etc. If A/C pipe is used, there
exists the potential for consumers to be exposed to significant concentrations
of asbestos in their drinking water.
Additional studies of asbestos-cement pipe systems have shown that there
are other factors in addition to those taken into account by the aggressive-
ness index which influence fiber removal from A/C pipe. For instance, the
source waters in 45 Connecticut asbestos-cement pipe systems were thought to
be very aggressive because the A.I.'s were under 10. However, none of the
systems showed high concentrations of asbestos in the distributed water after
A/C pipe. None of the pipe that had been dug up over the years had been
reported to be significantly deteriorated. All samples from the Connecticut
A/C pipe systems except one were below 1 MFL.
27
-------
One site in Connecticut which showed 10 MFL was resampled twice and was
found to be below 1 MFL on each occasion. The high count is felt to be the
result of pipe tapping. Tapping asbestos-cement pipe, that is, adding a
service connection to the distribution pipe, requires that a hole be cut in
the A/C pipe. Some tapping devices allow the debris from cutting to fall into
the pipe. This results in high asbestos fiber concentrations which may remain
in the water for weeks depending on water flow. There are tapping devices now
available which force the debris from cutting to be flushed from the pipe and
thus prevent the contamination of drinking water with fibers. Samples taken
from dead end areas or from fire hydrants that have not been completely
flushed may show high asbestos fiber concentrations not caused from pipe
deterioration but from an accumulation of sediment from previous pipe tap-
pings. This was the case in Amherst, Massachusetts where a sample taken at a
dead end of a system showed 190 MFL, but the distribution water showed es-
sentially no fibers. A sample of pipe dug up showed no signs of deteriora-
tion.
In another situation, in Florida, the A/C pipe system had a well source
water which was non-aggressive but fibers were found in the distribution
water. High H2S levels in the well sources were apparently attacking the
pipe. The aggressiveness index does not take into account the corrosive
effect of water quality parameters other than pH, calcium, and alkalinity.
The Florida town is currently studying the H2S problem and is planning to
implement treatment to eliminate it from the water before it flows through A/C
pipe.
Based on 1) the available results of fiber analyses from asbestos-cement
pipe distribution systems, 2) the estimate that only 16 percent of the U.S. water
supplies have highly aggressive water, 3) the knowledge that zinc, iron, and
perhaps manganese and organic materials can have a protective effect on A/C
pipe, and 4) the report that the majority of A/C pipe sold in the U.S. in the
last thirty-five years has been Type II (autoclaved and therefore more re-
sistant to corrosion), it is concluded that the majority of water consumers in
the U.S. who receive drinking water from asbestos-cement pipes are not exposed
to significant long term concentrations of waterborne asbestos fibers.
However, in areas of aggressive water the consumer may be exposed to
asbestos fiber concentrations of from less than 1 million to over 100 million
per liter depending on length of pipe and flow rate. Since some water sup-
plies in the United States have used A/C pipe to distribute water for over 40
years, it is possible that some residents in areas of highly aggressive water
have been exposed over a long period.
Because the advent of a tapping device which flushes the debris from
cutting out rather than into the pipe is fairly recent, it is possible that
many residents on A/C distribution lines have been exposed to intermittent
concentrations of asbestos fibers perhaps as high as 500 million fibers per
liter.
The Environmental Protection Agency is currently evaluating steps which
can be taken to prevent fibers from coming off asbestos-cement pipe. For
places where fibers have been found in asbestos-cement pipe distribution
28
-------
systems there are several promising water treatments or processes which can be
used to stop the fibers from getting into the drinking water.
EROSION OF ASBESTOS WASTE PILES
Samples of three city water supplies Atlanta, Philadelphia, and Danville,
that use rivers as the source of their water showed asbestos concentrations
above 10 million fibers per liter which were thought to be caused by the ero-
sion of asbestos waste piles into the river. Other samples taken at Atlanta,
Georgia and Philadelphia, Pennsylvania did not show high concentrations.
Additional sampling is planned for Danville, Kentucky. It has been suggested
that storm conditions cause infrequent but substantial amounts of asbestos
fibers to be present in the raw water. In most cases a filtration plant is
effective in dealing with the fiber concentration, but the possibility exists
that some fibers may get through to the drinking water. The extent of asbestos
dump sites in the U.S. and the possibility of fibers eroded from these dump
sites reaching public water supplies has not been determined.
The fiber concentration from one industrial discharge in Missouri was
found to be 2,000 MFL. An industrial discharge in Ohio after treatment by
settling pond was found to be under a million fibers per liter. A large
number of effluent discharges from asbestos related industries have been
analyzed for fibers and reported in reference 34. The fiber counts range from
< 106 to 1012 fibers per liter. There are currently no data to show with
certainty that these discharged fibers make their way into public water sup-
plies.
LARGEST U.S. CITIES
There are not sufficient data to clearly assess exposure in all cities.
Of the twenty largest cities in the United States, thirteen have been checked
for asbestos in their drinking water. In only one, San Francisco, is there
clear evidence of significant fiber concentrations. Some significant numbers
of asbestos fibers were found in the water systems of Philadelphia and Boston
by one researcher but these counts could not be reproduced by other researchers
at later times. For most cities there are only the results of a few samples
available to cover the entire city which may be served by several water utili-
ties. The estimate of waterborne asbestos exposure is based therefore on
available data and not on representative samples (Table 12). No data are
readily available as to the amount of asbestos-cement pipe in each city. Early
chemical data reported in 1962 for the public water supplies of the 100 largest
cities in the U.S. suggested that as many as 50 had at least moderately ag-
gressive water.5
Based on the very limited data, it is concluded that the majority of water
consumers in the largest U.S. cities are not exposed to concentrations of
asbestos over 1.0 MFL.
OVERALL ASSESSMENT
Based on the data presented in the Appendices and the evaluation of that
data as described in the preceding sections; it is concluded the majority
29
-------
(at least 90 percent) of water consumers in the U.S. are not exposed to as-
bestos concentrations over a million fibers per liter. In a few areas people
are exposed to concentrations between 1 and 10 million fibers per liter with
intermittent exposures over 100 MFL. Persons using asbestos-cement pipe
especially in areas where the water is non-aggressive or is treated to prevent
corrosion are generally not additionally exposed except for the possibility of
short, intermittent exposures due to improper pipe tapping procedures. In
areas of aggressive water, however, residents using water from asbestos-cement
mains may be exposed to high concentrations of fibers depending on factors
such as length of pipe, flow rate. A few people may be exposed to asbestos
in their drinking water from cisterns using asbestos tile roofs.
TABLE 12. AVAILABLE DATA ON ASBESTOS IN THE DRINKING WATER
OF THE 20 LARGEST U.S. CITIES
City
New York, NY
Chicago, IL
Los Angeles, CA
Philadelphia, PA
Houston, TX
Detroit, MI
Baltimore, MD
Dallas, TX
San Diego, CA
San Antonio, TX
Indianapolis, IN
Washington, D.C.
Honolulu, HA
Milwaukee, WI
Phoenix, AZ
San Francisco, CA
Memphis, TN
Cleveland, OH
Boston, MA
Jacksonville, FL
Population
1975 est.*
(Millions)
7.48
3.10
2.72
1.81
1.40
1.34
.85
.82
.77
.77
.73
.71
.71
.67
.66
.66
.66
.64
.64
.56
Number
of Asbestos
Analyses
12
over 50
1
over 50
10
0
6
2
0
2
1
3
0
0
0
over 50
3
0
17
0
Estimate of Waterborne
Asbestos Exposure
Below Detectable
Less than 1 MFL
Less than 1 MFL
Possible intermittent
Less than 1 MFL
-
Less than 1 MFL
Below Detectable
-
Less than 1 MFL
Less than 1 MFL
Less than 1 MFL
-
-
-
0-100 MFL
Less than 1 MFL
-
Possible intermittent
-
*Source: U.S. Bureau of Census59
30
-------
SECTION 9
EXPOSURE TO NON-ASBESTOS FIBERS IN WATER
Very little data has been reported concerning fibers other than asbestos
found in water supplies. In the several hundred water samples from all over
the U.S. analyzed by the EPA in Cincinnati, none were found to have signifi-
cant amounts of fiberglass. No reports of fiberglass in drinking water were
found in the literature. Significant numbers (over 1 MFL) of attapulgite
(palygorskite clay) have been found in well waters on islands off the coast of
Georgia and in two Florida water systems. These silicate fibers are similar
in appearance to chrysotile but are not asbestos. Halloysite clay fibers have
been reported in some California waters. Unidentified fibers containing
combinations of aluminum, silica, iron and/or titanium are occasionally found
but no substantial concentrations have been reported.
Some "fibers" of biological origin, pieces of diatoma, algae scales and
other fiber like fragments of organisms have been found in water samples,
sometimes in high concentrations.
From the analyses done by the EPA in Cincinnati, it is concluded that the
majority of U.S. water consumers are not exposed to concentrations of non-
asbestos mineral fibers above 100,000 fibers per liter. Some areas using
unfiltered water from reservoirs may be exposed to high concentrations of
biological "fibers."
31
-------
REFERENCES
1. Cunningham, H., and R. Pontefract. 1973. Asbestos fibers in beverages
drinking water, and tissues: their passage through the intestinal wall
and movement through the body. J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 56:976-981.
2. Nicholson, W.J., and F.L. Pundsack. 1973. Asbestos in the Environment.
In: P. Bogovski et al. (eds), Biological effects of asbestos. IARC Sci,
Publi. No. 8. pp 126-130.
3. Lewis, B.C. 1977. Asbestos in Cooling-Tower Waters. Report for the
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission #ANL/ES-63 available from NTIS,
Springfield, Virginia 22161.
4. Levine, R.J. (ed). 1978. Asbestos: An Information Resource. DHEW
Publication Number (NIH) 78-1681.
5. Cook, P.M., G.E. Glass, and J.H. Tucker. 1974. Asbestiform minerals:
Detection and measurement of high concentrations in municipal supplies.
Science 85(154):853-855.
6. Sargent, H.E. 1974. Asbestos in Drinking Water. N. Engl. Water Works
Assoc. 88:44-57.
7. McFarren, E.F. 1974. Determination of asbestos by optical microscopy.
In Proceedings of Amer. Water Works Assoc. Qual. Techn. Conf. Cincin-
nati, OH 1974, XVI-1 - XVI-5.
8. Federal Register 1972. Standard for exposure to asbestos dust. Title
29, Chapter XVII, Part 1910 - Occupational Safety and Health Standards.
Wed. June 7, Washington, D.C. 37(110):11318-11323.
9. McFarren, E.F., J.R. Millette, and R.J. Lishka. 1975. Asbestos analy-
sis by electron microscope, Proc. AWWA Quality Techn. Conf., American
Water Works Assoc., Denver, CO 80235, XIV-1 - XIV-12.
10. American Water Works Association. 1974. A study of the problem of
asbestos in water. Am. Water Works Assoc. J. 66(9) Part 2: 1-22.
11. McCrone, W.C. 1978. Identification of Asbestos by Polarized Light
Microscopy. In Proc. of Workshop on Asbestos: Definitions and Measure-
ment Methods, Gaithersburg, MD, July 18-20, 1977. Nat. Bur. Stand.
(U.S.), Spec. Publ. 506, 235-248.
32
-------
12. Pattnaik, A. and J.D. Meakim. 1973. Development of an instrumental
monitoring method for measurement of asbestos concentrations in or near
sources. USEPA #650/2-73-016 available from NTIS, Springfield, VA 22161.
13. Wehrung, J.M. and J.H. McAlear. 1977. Surveying for Asbestos in the
SEM in Proc. of Symp. on Electron Microscopy of Microfibers, Penn. State
Univ. 1976, I.M. Asher and P.P. McGrath (eds), U.S.G.P.O. #017-012-0244-7,
Wash. D.C. 151-157.
14. Ferrell, R.E., G.G. Paulson and C.W. Walker. 1975. Evaluation of an
SEM-EDS method for identification of chrysotile. Scanning Electron
Microscopy/1975 (Part II) 0. Johari (ed), IIT Research Institute, Chica-
go, 537-546.
15. Samudra, A.V., F.C. Bock, C.F. Harwood, and J.D. Stockham. 1978. Eval-
uating and optimizing electron microscope methods for characterizing
airborne asbestos EPA #600/2-78-038.
16. Flickinger, J. and J. Standridge. 1976. Identification of fibrous
material in two public water supplies. Envir. Sci. Tech. 10 (10):1028-
1032.
17. Chopra, K.S. 1978. Interlaboratory Measurements of Amphibole and Chry-
sotile Fiber Concentration in Water. J. of Testing and Evaluation,
6(4) .-241-247.
18. McGrath, P.P. 1976. Summary in Proc. of the FDA Symposium on Electron
Microscopy of Microfibers, held at the Pennsylvania State University,
Aug. 1976. HEW Publication (FDA) 77-1033. U.S. Dept. of Health, Edu-
cation, and Welfare, Rockville, MD, 1976, pp 189.
19. Bonner, W.P., R.B. Bustamante, H.W. Leiner and J.T. Scardina. 1977.
Identification of asbestos-type materials in suspended solids, Water
Resources Research Center, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN.,
Research Report #61.
20. Kramer, J.R., O.R. Mudrock. 1974. Asbestos research at McMaster Uni-
versity. Can. Res. Dev. 7(6):31-2, 55.
21. Chatfield, E.J. 1974. Quantitative analysis of asbestos minerals in
air and water/ 32nd Ann. Proc. Electron Microscopy Soc. Amer. St. Louis,
Missouri, C.J. Arceneaux (ed) 528-529.
22. Kay, G.H. 1974. Asbestos in drinking water. J. Am. Water Works Assoc.
66:513-514.
23. Leineweber, J.P. 1968. A method for determination of the fiber content
of water. Johns-Manvilie Research and Engineering Center Report No.
E404-37, 14 pp.
24. Nicholson, W.J. 1974. Analysis of Amphibole Asbestiform Fibers in
Municipal Water Supplies. Envir. Health Persp. 9:165-172.
33
-------
25. Rohl, A.N., O.M. Langer, and I.J. Selikoff, 1977. Environmental asbestos
pollution related to use of quarried serpentine rock. Science 196:1319-
1322.
26. Ruud, C.O. 1978. An overview of electron microscopy methods. In Proc.
of Workshop on Asbestos: Definitions and Measurement Methods, Gathers-
burg, MD, July 18-20, 1977. Nat. Bur. Stand. (U.S.), Spec. Publ. 506,
221-234.
27. Murr, I.E., and K. Kloska. 1976. The Detection and Analysis of Parti-
culates in Municipal Water Supplies by TEM. Water Research 10:469-477.
28. Durham, R.W., and T.W.S. Pang. 1975. Asbestos Fibres in Lake Superior
Ameri. Soc. Testing Materials, Spec. Pub. #573, pp 5-13.
29. Oliver, T., and L.E. Murr. 1976. An Electron Microscope Study of
Asbestiform Fiber Concentrations in Rio Grande Valley Water Supplies, J.
AWWA, 9:428-431.
30. Flickinger, J. 1977. Analysis of Asbestos Fibers in Water. Master's
Thesis, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin. 98 pp.
31. Cooper, R.C., and J.C. Murchio. 1976. Preliminary studies of asbesti-
form fibers in domestic water supplies. Final report to the Aerospace
Medical Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio.
Available from NTIS U.S. Dept. of Commerce #AD-A011-855, also in Proc.
5th Conf. on Environmental Toxicology, Ohio (Sept. 1974).
32. Anderson, C.H., and J.M. Long. 1976. Preliminary Interim Procedure
for Fibrous Asbestos. U.S.E.P.A., Athens, GA. 30 pp.
33. Stewart, I. 1976. Asbestos in the Water Supplies of the Ten Regional
Cities, Final Report - Part I, EPA Report #560/6-76-017, 58 pp.
34. Stewart, I. 1976. Asbestos Fibers in Natural Runoff and Discharges
from Sources Manufacturing Asbestos Products, Final Report - Part II EPA
Report #560/6-76-018, 166 pp.
35. Beaman, D.R., and D.M. File. 1976. Quantitative Determination of
Asbestos Fiber Concentrations, Analytical Chem. 48(1):101-110.
36. Chatfield, E.J., et al_. 1978. Preparation of Water Samples for Asbestos
Fiber Counting by Electron Microscopy, ORD Research Publication, EPA-
600/4-78-011.
37. Stewart, I., 1976. Selected Thoughts on Asbestos Quantitation, In
Proc. of Symp. on Electron Microscopy of Microfibers at Penn. State Univ.
1976. pp. 93-97.
38. Anderson, C.H. 1978. Environmental Protection Agency Interim Method
for Determining Asbestos in Water, Nat. Bureau of Standards Spec. Pub.
506. Proc. of Workshop on Asbestos: Definitions and Measurement Methods
held at NBS, Gaithersburg, MD, July 18-20, 1977. pp. 365-376.
34
-------
39. Cook, P.M., I.E. Rubin, C.J. Maggiore, and W.J. Nicholson. 1976. X-ray
Diffraction and Electron Beam Analysis of Asbestiform Minerals in Lake
Superior Waters in Proc. Inter. Conf. on Environmental Sensing and As-
sessment, Las Vegas, NV, 34:1-9.
40. Jaffe, M.S., 1948. Handling and Washing Fragile Replicas. Proc. of
EMSA, Toronto, J. Appli.,Phys., 19 (12):1189.
41. Ontario Ministry of the Environment. 1977. An Interim Method for the
Determination of Asbestos Fibre Concentrations in Water by Transmission
Electron Microscopy. 36 pp.
42. Ortiz, L.W. and B.L. Isom. 1974. Transfer technique for electron
microscopy of membrane filter samples. Amer. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J.
423-425.
43. Zumwalde, R.D., and J.M. Dement. 1977. Review and Evaluation of Ana-
lytical Methods for Environmental Studies of Fibrous Particulate Exposure,
DHEW, (NIOSH) Pub. No. 77-204.
44. Dement, J.M., R.D. Zumwalde, and K.M. Wallingford. 1975. Asbestos
fiber exposures in a hard rock gold mine. Ann. N.Y. Acad. of Science.
271:345-352.
45. Brown, A.L., W.F. Taylor and R.E. Corter. 1976. The Reliability of
Measures of Amphibole Fiber Concentration in Water. Environ. Research
, 12:150-160.
•j
46. Hallenbeck, W.H., E.H. Chen and A.H. Wolff. 1977. Precision of Analy
sis for Waterborne Chrysotile Asbestos by Transmission Electron Micro-
scopy. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 17:551-558.
47. Leineweber, J.P. 1978. Statistics and the Significance of Asbestos
Fiber Analyses. In Proc. of Workshop on Asbestos: Definitions and
Measurement Methods, Gaithersburg, MD, July 18-20, 1977. Nat. Bur.
Stand. (U.S.), Spec. Publ. 506, 281-294.
48. Gravitt, C.C., P.O. LaFleur, and K.F.J. Heinrich (eds). 1978. Proc.
of Workshop on Asbestos: Definitions and Measurement Methods, Gaithers-
burg, MD, July 18-20, 1977. Nat. Bur. Stand. (U.S.) Spec. Publ. 506, 490
P-
49. Asher, I.M. and P.P. McGrath (eds). 1977. Proc. of Symp. on Electron
Microscopy of Microfibers, Penn. State Univ. 1976, USGPO #017-012-0244-7,
Wash. D.C. 207 p.
50. Lee, R.J. 1978. Basic Concepts of Electron Diffraction and Asbestos
Identification using Selected Area Diffraction. Part I. Current Methods
of Asbestos Identification Using SAD in Scanning Electron Microscopy/
1978/1, O.Johari (Ed.), SEM Inc. Chicago 677-695.
35
-------
51. Watkins, J., R.A. Ryder, and W.A. Persich. 1978. Investigation of
Turbidity, Asbestos Fibers, and Particle Counting Techniques as Indices
of Water Treatability of a Cascade Mountain Source, In: Proc. of the
Amer. Water Works Assoc. Annual Conf., Atlantic City, N.J. June 25-30.
52. Hesse, C.S., W.H. Hallenbekc, E.H. Chen, and G.R. Brenniman. 1977. De-
termination of Chrysotile Asbestos in Rainwater. Atmospheric Environ-
ment 11(12):1233-1237.
53. Olson, H.L. 1974. Asbestos in Potable Water Supplies. J. AWWA
66:515-518.
54. Langlier, W.F. 1936. The Analytical Control of Anti-Corrosion Water
Treatment, J. AWWA 29(10):1500-1521.
55. American Water Works Association. 1977. Standard for Asbestos-Cement
Pressure Pipe, 4 in. through 24 in. for Water and Other Liquids. Publ.
AWWA C402-77.
56. McFarren, E., R.W. Buelow, R.C. Thurnau, M. Gardels, R.K. Sorrell,
P. Snyder, and R.C. Dressman. 1977. Water Quality Deterioration in the
Distribution System. In: Proceedings of the Water Quality Technology
Conference, Kansas City, MO, December 5-6, 1977.
57. Millette, J.R., A.F. Hammonds, E.G. Hansen and M.F. Pansing. Aggres-
sive Water and Water Utilities from Representative Areas of the U.S.
(submitted to J. AWWA).
58. Hudson, H.E. and F.W. Gilcreas. 1976. Health and Economic Aspects of
Water Hardness and Corrosiveness. Journal Amer. Water Works Assoc.
5:68(4) 173-222.
59. Newspaper Enterprise Association Inc. The World Almanac and Book of
Facts 1979, New York. p. 212.
36
-------
APPENDIX A
ASBESTOS IN WATER: MASS DATA
Some waterborne asbestos data for U.S. drinking water sources and distri-
bution points have been determined using the rubout technique followed by TEM
analysis. This method of sample preparation destroys the fiber size distri-
bution of the sample and therefore only provides data about the mass of as-
bestos present. Fiber counts determined using this method are not considered
reliable.
TABLE A-l. MASS OF ASBESTOS FIBER BY RUBOUT IN CITY WATER10
State
AZ
AZ
CA
CA
CA
CA
RI
RI
RI
RI
RI
KS
KS
KS
TN
MI
MI
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
AZ
AZ
AZ
City
Globe
Globe
San Diego
San Diego
Long Beach
Long Beach
Providence
Providence
Providence
Providence
Providence
Wichita
Wichita
Wichita
Memphis
Saginaw
Saginaw
Malvern
Malvern
Malvern
Malvern
Malvern (ave 26
samples)
Malvern (ave 24
samples)
Glendale
Glendale
Glendale
Type*
S
D
S
D
S
D
S
D
D
S
D
D
S
D
D
S
D
S
D
S
D
S
D
S
D
S
Miles
A-C pipe
0.0
0.0
0.53
0.0
0.53
0.0
0.53
0.0
2.51
0.0
Date
12/19/69
12/19/69
12/19/70
12/19/70
69-70
69-70
9/10/69
9/10/69
12/06/70
Fibers
yg/gai
0.26
0.43
0.27
3.16
2.51
2.34
0.95
1.45
2.19
0.76
1.01
1.58
1.18
6.03
6.42
0.012
0.0048
0.183
0.985
0.472
0.258
0.166
0.450
0.088
0.214
0.003
Fibers
Pg/1
0.07
0.11
0.07
0.83
0.66
0.62
0.25
0.38
0.58
0.20
0.27
0.42
0.31
1.59
1.69
0.003
0.001
0.05
0.26
0.12
0.07
0.04
0.12
0.02
0.06
0.0008
Lab
JMR
1!
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
1 1
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
37
-------
TABLE A-1 (continued)
State
AZ
AZ
AZ
City
Glendale
Glendale (ave 35
samples)
Glendale (ave 35
samples)
Type*
D
S
D
Miles
A-C pipe
2.51
0.0
0.0
Date
12/06/70
69-70
69-70
Fibers
yg/gai
0.005
0.023
0.038
Fibers
yg/1 Lab
0.001 "
0.006 "
0.01 "
''Type of sample; S = source, D = distribution point.
TABLE A-2. MASS OF AMPHIBOLE FIBER IN CITY WATER BY RUBOUT24
State
MN
ii
ii
ii
n
NY
WI
City
Duluth, Lower
Duluth, Middle
Duluth, Upper
Duluth, Syst.
Grand Marais
New York City
Superior
Res.
Res.
Res.
Intake
Fibers
yg/liter
27
2.7
11
20
None
None
1.4
Fibers
x!06/liter
74
25
24
60
detected
detected
4
Lab
MSS
n
ii
n
n
n
1 1
TABLE A-3. RANGE OF MASS OF CHRYSOTILE IN UNTREATED RIVER WATER10
State
PA
n
ii
n
VT
NH
MA
CN
River
Juniata
ii
n
ii
Connecticut
n
n
n
Location
Breezewood
Newt own- Hami 1 1 on
Lewistown
Amity Hall
Canaan
Lebanon
Greenfield
Middletown
(Values
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
in yg/1)*
- 9.2
- 8.7
- 15.0
- 14.8
- 13.8
- 3.1
- 23.5
-14.5
*Eleven samples at each site over a year.
38
-------
APPENDIX B
ASBESTOS IN WATER: FIBER COUNT DATA
The following computer listing contains waterborne asbestos fiber con-
centration data determined by transmission electron microscopy on samples pre-
pared by various procedures. The listing is arranged in order by state, city,
and date of sample. Information is also given as to the analyzing laboratory
and type of method used to prepare the samples for asbestos analysis. A
source code which references the original source of the data is also given.
The waterborne asbestos file has been computerized and will be updated
periodically. Researchers having additional data on asbestos concentrations
present in drinking water are encouraged to contact the first author. Although
the listing has been reviewed carefully, errors may exist and if found should
be directed to the attention of the author.
INFORMATION GIVEN IN THE LISTING
State
Standard two letter state designations are given.
City
The name of the city (or occasionally the county) where the samples was
taken is given. Additional data concerning street names, water utilities, or
description of site are given.
If the sample was reported with an identification number, it is listed
under the third heading.
Type
The type of water that was analyzed is classified as F-Finished, after
treatment but before the distribution system; D-Distribution, in the piping
system at some point such as a consumer's tap; R-Raw, before treatment; or fi
ef fluent from an industrial or other waste water discharger.
Source
The source of the water that was analyzed is classified as S-Surface,
river or reservoir, W-wells, groundwater, C-cistern, catch basin of water
collected from a roof, or B-Combined.
39
-------
Miles A-C Pipe
If a water is known to have flowed through asbestos-cement pipe before
being sampled, that distance in miles is listed. If unknown, no value is
placed under this heading.
Date Collected
If the actual day was not reported, zeros appear between the month and
year. In the case of composite samples the first day in the composite is
listed. Some samples of old water (1963) were cans of water stored in shel-
ters.
Amphibole MFL
The results reported for amphibole fibers in terms of millions of fibers
per liter are given under this heading.
Chrysotile MFL
The results reported for chrysotile fibers in terms of millions of fibers
per liter are given under this heading. In some instances results for one or
the other of the two asbestos classes were not reported.
Blank MFL
The results reported for blank analyses in total asbestos fibers are given
uder this heading. Blank analyses include filtering of clean prefiltered water
through a filter and preparing the blank filter using the same steps as those
used in preparing the water sample. Although many laboratories analyze blanks,
few report them. Much of the data under this heading is currently being added.
The letters B and N before the concentration values indicate values that
are below detectable limits and not statistically significant respectively.
The detectable limit is considered the concentration that would be determined
if one fiber was counted and the appropriate calculations were made. BO.020 is
read below the detectable limit of 0.02 times 106 fibers per liter. See
Section 6 for a discussion of statistical significance. A N is used before a
value in the listing if it is known that the value is based on less than 5
fibers counted. Values preceded by an N should be considered less accurate
than others.
In some cases when no data was reported on the number of actual fibers
counted, the preceding N could not be used to indicate less significant data.
Met
The method sample preparation was classified as C-centrifuge method, R-
rubout technique, B-double Nuclepore filter, D-drop drying, M-Millipore con-
densation washer, L-Millipore Jaffe wick, N-Nuclepore Jaffe wick, or E-Milli-
pore collapsed filter. See Section 4 for details on the preparation methods.
40
-------
Lab
Three letter initials of the laboratories analyzing the sample are given
under this heading. The laboratory designations are described in the List of
Abbreviations in the begining of the report.
Ref
A source code for the analysis is given under this heading.
The source code designations are as follows:
AA McFarren, E.F., J.R. Millette, R.J. Lishka. 1975 Asbestos Analysis by
Electron Microscope. Proceedings of AWWA Water Quality Technology Conf.
Amer. Water Works Assoc. XIV-1 - XIV-12, and Preliminary Assessment of
Suspected Carcinogens in Drinking Water, Report to Congress, 1975, EPA-
OTS, Appendix E, p. 135.
AB In-house files of the Health Effects Research Laboratory, Exposure Eval-
uation Branch and files of the Municipal Environmental Research Labora-
tory, Drinking Water Research Division.
AC I. Stewart, Asbestos in the Water Supplies of the Ten Regional Cities,
Final Report-Part I EPA Report 560/6-76-017 1976, available from the
National Technical Information Service, 58 p.
AD I. Stewart, Asbestos Fibers in Natural Runoff and Discharges from Sources
Manufacturing Asbestos Products, Final Report-Part II EPA Report 560/676-
018, 1976 available from the National Technical Information Service 166
P-
AE Beaman, D.R. and D.M. File, Quantitative Determination of Asbestos Fiber
Concentrations, Analytical Chemistry 48(1):101-110, 1976.
AF Flickinger, J. and J. Standridge, Identification of Fibrous Material in
Two Public Water Supplies. Envir. Sci. Tech., 10(10):1028-1032, 1976.
AH Oliver, T. and L.E. Murr, An Electron Microscope Study of Asbestiform
Fiber Concentrations in Rio Grande Valley Water Supplies, J. AWWA, 9:
428-431, 1976.
AI Murr, L.E. and K. Kloska, The Detection and Analysis of Particulates in
Municipal Water Supplies by TEM. Water Research 10:469-477, 1976.
AJ Hallenbeck, W.H., E.H. Chen, C.S. Hesse, K. Patel-Mandlik, and A.H.
Wolff. Is Chrysotile Asbestos Released from Asbestos-Cement Pipe into
Drinking Water. J. AWWA 70(2):97-102, 1977.
AK Hallenbeck, W.H., E.H. Chen, C.S. Hesse, K. Patel-Mandlik, and A.H.
Wolff. Is Chrysotile Asbestos Released from Asbestos-Cement Pipe into
Drinking Water. UILU-WRC-77-0118 Research Report No. 118, Univ. of 111.
at Urbana-Champaign, Water Resources Center, Jan. 1977.
41
-------
AL Cooper, R.C. and J.C. Murchio, Preliminary Studies of Asbestiform Fibers
in Domestic Water Supplies, Final Report to the Aerospace Medical Research
Laboratory, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio, Available from NTIS
U.S. Dept. of Commerce #AD-A011-855. 1976.
AM Watkins, J., R.A. Ryder, and W.A. Persich, Investigation of Turbidity
Asbestos Fibers, and Particle Counting Techniques as Indices of Water
Treatability of a Cascade Mountain Water Source, Presented at the AWWA
Annual Conference, Atlantic City, N.J. June 25-30, 1978.
AN Cook, P.M., I.E. Rubin, C.J. Maggiore, and W.J. Nicholson, X-ray Dif-
fraction and Electron Beam Analysis of Asbestiform Minerals in Lake
Superior Waters. Proc. Intern. Conf. on Environ. Sensing and Assessment,
Pub. by IEEE, Piscataway, N.J. 34(2):1-9. 1977.
AO McMillan, L.M., R.G. Stout, and B.F. Willey. Asbestos in Raw and
Treated Water: An Electron Microscopy Study. Environ. Sci. and Tech.
11(4):390-394, 1977.
AP Personal Communication: G.S. Logsdon, DWRD, MERL-EPA-Cincinnati, OH.
AQ Personal Communication: S.J. Greenwood, Minn. Dept. of Health.
AR Personal Communication: C.H. Anderson, and J.M. Long, SERL, EPA-Athens,
GA.
AS Personal Communication: P.M. Cook, ERL-EPA-Duluth, MM.
AT Personal Communication: L. McMillan, City of Chicago Water Department
Microscopy Unit, Chicago, IL.
AU Personal Communication: W.H. Hallenbeck, School of Public Health, Univ.
of 111., Chicago, IL.
AV Flickinger, J. Analysis of Asbestos Fibers in Water, Masters' Thesis,
Univ. of Wisconsin 1977, Madison, WI.
AW Kanarek, M. Asbestos in Drinking Water and Cancer Incidence; Ph.D. Dis-
sertation, University of California, Berkeley 1978, Berkeley, CA.
AX Fairless, B. 1974. Asbestos Fiber Concentrations in the Drinking Water
of Communities Using the Western Arm of Lake Superior as a Potable Water
Source. Report of Surveillance and Analysis Division, Central Regional
Laboratory, USEPA, Reg. V, Chicago, IL. p. 12.
AY Black and Veatch, Consulting Engineers. 1975. Director Filtration of
Lake Superior Water for Asbestiform Fiber Removal. Envir. Prot. Techn.
Series. EPA-670/2-75-050e. Appendix G p. 39-42.
AZ Lewis, B.C. Asbestos in Cooling-Tower Waters. Report for the U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission #ANL/ES-63.
42
-------
PEF
12715
13074
35433
35432
24854
71612
21612
21609
37908
16037
18038
16926
06-22-79 P»GE 1
STATE CITY ID 1YPE SOURCE MILES DATF AMPHIBOLE CHRYSOTILE BLANK MET LAB
A-C PIPE COLLECTED MFL MFL MFL
AK ANCHORAGE
AK FAIRBANKS
AL ABBEVILLE
AL ABBEVILLF
AL BIRMINGHAM
AL MONTGOMERY
AL MONTGOMERY
AL TUSCALOOSA
AL TUSCALOOSA
AR JONESBORO
AR LITTLE ROCK
AR VAN BUREN, AT A/C PIPE CD,
AZ YUMA
CA ALAMEDA
CA ALAMEDA CO,
CA ALAMEDA CO.
CA ALAMEDA CO., ACWD CHEM LAB
CA ALAMEDA CO., VISTA SCHOOL
CA ALBANY
CA ALBANY
CA ALBANY
CA ANTIOCH, CONTRA COSTA CO.
CA ANTIOCH, CONTRA COSTA CO.
CA ANTIOCHi CONTRA COSTA CO,
CA ATASCADERO
CA ATHF.RTON
CA ATHERTON
CA ATHERTON
CA ATWATEP
CA BELMONT
CA BELMONT
CA BELMONT
CA BELMONT
CA RELMflNT
CA BERKELEY
CA BERKELEY
CA BERKELEY
CA BERKFLEY
CA BERKELEY
(TYPE) FzFJNISHED AT SOURCE DsDISTPIBUTION R»PAW EaPLANT DISCHARGE EFFLUENT
(SOURCE) SsSUPFACE, W=WELL, C=CISTEPN, B=COMHINED
(B/N) BsBFLOrt DETECTION LIMIT NxNOT STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT
(METHODl) M»MTLLIPORF CONn. WASH., NsNUCI.EPOHf. JAFFE, D=DPOP, L»MILLIPORE JAFFE-WICK, BrDOUBLE NUCLEPORE FILTER
(LAB) EPCiEPA, CINCINNATI EPDsEPA, DULUTH EPG=CPA, ATHENS, GA MCC=MCCRONE ASSOCIATES, UILsUNIVERSlTY OF ILLINOIS, DOW"
DOW CHEMICAL, MIDLAND, MI., UCBxU. OF CALIF., PFRKF.I^Y, WISsWISC. DEPT, OF NATURAL RESOURCES, UWA = U. WASH., SEATTLE. MSSs MT,
SINAI HOSP., NFW YORK, NMI=NE« MEXICO INST, Ut MINING. CMC=riTY OF CHICAGO WATER PURIFICATION LABORATORY, MDH=MINN, DEPT. OF HEALT
UMD«UNIV. OF MINN,, OUL'ITH
4851
4836
4839
4769
4812
4811
4311
4310
4825
37457
4729
4728
4727
37409
4724
4723
4722
4721
4899
4364
4361
4808
4807
4805
D
F
F
D
D
D
D
D
F
F
F
D
D
P
F
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
0
D
0.00
0.00
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0,50
1.90
0.40
0.40
0.35
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.20
0,00
0.00
0.80
07/00/74
11/01/74 B
03/05/76 B
03/05/76 B
11/25/74 B
12/27/74 B
12/27/74 B
11/25/74 N
03/28/77 B
09/19/74 B
10/09/74 N
02/06/7S
11/26/74 B
06/21/77 B
07/00/74
07/00/74
04/27/77 B
04/27/78 B
03/00/63 B
01/27/77 B
01/27/77 B
OR/12/76 B
08/12/76 B
04/18/77 B
02/16/77 8
07/28/77 B
07/28/77 B
07/28/77
02/04/77 B
07/27/77 B
07/27/77 B
07/27/77
07/27/77 B
07/27/77 B
12/13/76
12/13/76
01/27/77 B
01/27/77 B
01/27/77
0.700
0.020
0.010
0,010
0.040
0.010
0.070
0.070
0.010
0.020
0.070
0.020
0.100
0.050
0.025
0.020
0.100
0,100
0,050
0.020
0,025
0.030
0.050
0.025
0.010
0.025
0.200
0,025
0.050
0.025
2.200
0.200
0,130
0.100
1.000
N
B
N
B
B
B
B
N
B
B
B
B
N
B
B
B
0,070
0.020
0.050 B
0.010 B
0.040
0.100
0,070
0,450
0,010 N
0,070
0,300
40.000
0.100
0,600
0,040
0.040
0.300
0.200
0.020
0.400
0,200
0.200
0.260
0.130
0.300 N
0,050
0,025
0,050 N
0,050
0,400
0.025
0.050
0.050
1.200
0.100
0.270
0.800
0.100
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.060
0.010
M EPC
M EPC
M EPC
M (.PC
H EPC
M EPC
M EPC
M EPC
M EPC
M EPC
M EPC
M MCC
M EPC
M UCB
B UCB
B UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
H UCB
M EPC
M UCB
M UCB
H UCB
M EPC
M UCB
H UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
H UCB
M UCB
M UCB
AA
AA
AB
AB
AA
AA
AA
AA
AB
AA
AA
AD
AA
AW
AL
AL
AM
AW
AW
AM
AVi
AW
AM
AM
AB
AW
AW
AM
AB
AM
A*
AW
AW
AW
AW
AW
AW
AW
AW
-------
06-27-
STATE
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
•79
CITY
BERKELEY
BERKFLFY
BERKELEY
RFPKFLEY
BERKELEY
BERKELEY
BERKELEY UCB
BKPNAPO, ALAMEDA CO.
BOLLMAN
ROLLMAN
ROLLMAN
BOLLMAN
BOLLMAN
BOLLMAN
ROLLMAN
BOLLMAN
BOLLMAN
BROADMORE
HURLINGAMF
RUPLINGAME
BURLINGAME
BUPLINGAME
FJUPLINGAHE CITY
CASTRO VALLEY
CHA80T
CLAY, RESERVOIR NEAR
CLAYTON
CLAYTON
CONCORD
CONCORD
CONCORD
CONCORD
CONTRA COSTA co, CANAL
CONTRA COSTA CO, CANAL
CONTRA COSTA CO, CANAL
CONTRA COSTA cn, CANAL
CONTRA COSTA co, CANAL
CONTRA COSTA co, CANAL
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
CRYSTAL SPRING
CRYSTAL SPRING
CRYSTAL SPRING
CRYSTAL SPRING
DALY CITY
DALY CITY
DALJ CITY
DALY CITY
PLANT
PLANT
PLANT
PLANT
PLANT
PLANT
ID 1YPE SOURCE
MILES DATE AMPHIBOLE
A-C PIPE COLLECTED MFL
PAGE 2
CHRYSDTILE BLANK MET LAB
MFL MFL
REF
4108
4804
4»03
4B01
4800
4817
4317A
4R35
4312
4632
483(1
4440
4741
4781
4608
4713
44*2
4461
4465
4464
4»53
4854
48?7
4771
4343
4833
4316
4315
4314
4829A
4829
4439
4894
4693
47B7
4790
4710
4709
4714
4777
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0,00
0.00
0,00
1
0,20
0.00
2.10
0.00
3.60
3,60
0,00
0,00
0.00
0,00
0,00
0,00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
o.oo
01/27/77 B
01/27/77 B
01/27/77
01/27/77 B
01/27/77 B
02/22/77 B
<00/00/64 B
04/27/78 B
12/10/74 B
10/15/75 B
08/13/76
04/18/77 B
04/18/77 B
05/11/77 B
08/05/77 8
01/09/78 B
04/04/78
07/07/77 S
05/26/77 6
05/26/77 B
05/26/77 B
05/26/77 B
07/00/74
06/21/77 B
06/21/77 B
06/00/77 B
12/10/74 B
04/18/77 B
<00/00/69 B
12/10/74 B
08/12/76
04/18/77 B
08/13/76 N
08/13/76 N
08/13/76
04/18/77 B
04/18/77 B
05/11/77 B
07/00/74
07/14/77 B
07/14/77 B
01/11/78 B
01/12/78
07/07/77 B
07/07/77 B
07/07/77 B
12/06/77 B
0.100
0.100
1.000
0.100
0.100
0.100
0.050
0.025
0.005
0.005
0.010
0.025
0.025
0,025
0.050
0,025
0,025
0,025
0.200
0.200
0,200
0.200
0.100
0.025
0.063
0.007
0.025
0,025
0.030
0.040
0.025
0,800
0.200
2.500
5.000
0.500
0.025
0.500
0.200
0,025
0,025
0.100
0,050
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
0.600
0,400
0.200
0.200
0,600
0.100
0.050
0.025
0.005
0.130
0.160
0.025
0,025
0.180
0.700
0.025
0.150
0.125
14.000
15.000
9.200
14.000
0.020
0.800
0.300
0.063
0,007
0,025
0,025
0.030
0.540
0.150
8.000
0.600
10.000
15.000
0.040
52,000
0.025
60.000
8.500
0,200
0.125
7,000
0.150
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
B UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M MCC
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
B UCB
M UCB
H UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
AW
AM
AN
AM
AM
Ah
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AH
AM
AM
AM
AW
AM
AM
AM
AL
AW
AM
AZ
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AH
AM
AM
AM
AM
AH
AH
AL
AM
AH
AM
AH
AM
AN
AM
Ah
(TYPE) F=VlN1SHhD AT SOl'PCE D=DIStP1 HUTION R = RAW
CSOUPCE) S«SURFACE. M=W£LL, C*CISTKRN, H=COMBINFD
(B/N) BsBFLHW DETECTION LIMIT NzNOT STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT
(METHODI) -MSMTLLlPOPE CDNP. *ASH., N = Nl)CLFPuHE JAFFt,, DsDHOP,
(LAB) EPC = EPA, CINCINNATI FPDsFPA. UULUTH EPG = E,PA, BTHFNS, GA
DOW CHEMICAL, MIDLAND, Ml
SINAI HOSP.J NE« YORK, N
UMD = UMV, OF MINN., DltLUTH
E=PLANT DISCHARGE EFFLUENT
MILLIPORE JAFFE-WICK, B = DOUBLE NUCLiPORE FILTER
MCC'MCCRONE ASSOCIATES, UIL = UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS, DOM =
UCPaU. VI CALIF.; BERKELEY, W1S = W1SC. DtPT, OF NATURAL RESOURCES, UWAat). HASH., SEATTLE, MSS« MT ,
e:^ VFXICO i^'T. ot MJNINO, CMC=CITY OF CHICAGO MAT&R PURIFICATION LABUHATOPY, M.DH=MINN, DEPT, OF HE*LT
-------
06-22-79
STATF CITY
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
DALY CITY
DANVILLE
E, PALO ALTOS
E. PALO ALTOS
E. PALO ALTOS
EL SUBPANTE
EL StlBPANTE
EMERYVILLE
FOLSOM S. CANAL, SACRAMENTO
FOSTER CITY
FOSTER CITY
FOSTER CITY
FOSTER CITY
fPFEMONT, ALAMADA CO.
FPEEMONT, ALAMADA CO.
FREEMONT, ALAMADA CO.
FRFEMONT, ALAMADA CO.
MALLARD
MALLARD
MALLARD
HAYWARD,
HAYWARD,
HAYWARD,
HAYWARD,
HAYWAPD,
HAYWARD,
AZALEA CRT
D. STREET
DESOTO BOOSTER ST
HAYWAPD BLVD.
PARTICK AVE.
REDUCING STA
HAYWAPD, SAN LORENZO
HILLSBOPOUGH
HILL5BOPOUGH
LAFAYETTF
LAFAYETTE
LIVERMOREf ALAMEDA CO.
LOS ANGELES
MAPIN, ALPINE LAKE
MARIN, BON TFMPE
MARIN, BON TEMPE
MARIN. BON TEMPE
MARIN. BON TEMPE
MAPIN, CORTE MADERA
MARIN, CORTE MADERA
MARIN, KENT ALPINE MIX
MARIN, KENT L»KF
MARIN, KFNT PUMPS
MARIN, KENT PUMPS
MARIN, KENTWOODLAND
MAPIN, KFNTWOODLANO
MARIN, MILL VALLEY
4778
4942
4732
4731
4730
4845
4848
4763
4378
4376
4726
4725
4340
4707
4708
4837
4782
4609
4735
4736
4734
4737
4738
4733
4855
4867
4874
4337
4844
4600
30956
4362A
4743
4791
4346
4350
4041
4040
4302
4353
4744
4348
F
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
0
D
D
D
D
D
R
R
R
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
F
F
p
R
r
F
F
D
D
R
R
R
R
D
D
D
II
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
LES
PIPE
.00
.10
.40
.66
.00
.35
.55
.64
.55
.66
.00
.00
.00
.45
.10
.00
.20
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.65
.00
.00
.00
.00
DATE
COLLECTED
12/06/77
06/20/77
07/25/77
07/28/77
07/28/77
06/20/77
06/20/77
08/12/77
06/00/77
12/17/76
12/17/76
07/27/77
07/27/77
04/27/77
07/07/77
07/07/77
04/27/78
10/13/75
01/09/78
04/04/78
08/01/77
08/01/77
08/01/77
08/01/77
08/01/77
08/01/77
06/21/77
07/05/77
07/11/77
10/07/76
06/20/77
02/28/78
04/00/75
02/00/73
02/00/73
12/13/76
08/10/77
01/14/78
11/10/76
11/12/76
07/U/73
02/00/73
07/11/73
02/25/76
11/12/76
08/10/77
11/10/76
AMPHIBOLE
B
B
B
B
8
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
o.
0.
3.
0.
0.
1.
0.
1.
0.
0.
1.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
MFL
600
050
025
050
200
025
100
025
063
130
330
200
250
025
050
025
200
500
300
300
250
000
067
000
050
050
500
200
140
050
050
100
050
100
100
020
020
020
050
040
CHRYSOTILE
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
N
N
B
B
B
B
B
15
0
0
I
20
0
0
0
0
0
1
43
6
0
0
0
0
0
4
17
6
34
1
2
1
0
0
44
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
200
0
0
0
0
0
MFL
.000
.050
.025
.450
.000
.025
.100
.075
.063
.067
.100
.000
.000
.250
.025
.250
.150
.600
.000
.000
.200
.000
.000
.500
,000
.050
.650
.000
.000
.020
.050
.025
.500
.000
.200
.100
.100
.040
.040
.500
,000
.270
.300
.020
.050
.020
PAGE 3
BLANK MET LAB
MFL
REF
M
M
M
M
H
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
H
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
H
H
M
M
M
H
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
MCC
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
EPC
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
AW
AM
AH
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AZ
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AH
AM
AM
AH
AH
AN
AM
AN
AH
AH
AW
AN
AH
AB
AW
AW
AH
AW
AW
AW
AM
AM
AM
AW
AW
AW
AW
AW
(TYPF) FsFINISHED AT SOURCE DsOISTRIBUTION RaRA* EsPLANT DISCHARGE EFFLUENT
(SOURCE) S«SUPFACE, W«WfLL, C*CISTEPN, B=COMB1NED
(B/N) B«BELOW DETECTION LIMIT NsNOT STATISIICALLY SIGNIFICANT
(METHOD:) MaMILLIPORE COND. l«iA.SH., NzNUCLEPORE JAfrFE, D = OROP, LaMJLLIPORF JAFFE-WICK, BsDOUBLE NUCLEPORE FILTER
(LAB) EPC«EPA, CINCINNATI EPDsFPA, IM'LUTH KHGsEPA, ATHENS, G» MCCsMCCRONE ASSOCIATES, UIHUNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS, DOW«
DOW CHFMICAL, MIDLAND, MI., UCRsM. (IF CALIF., hERKELFY, WISsWISC. DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES, UWA*H. WASH., SEATTLE, MSS» MT.
SINAI HOSP., NF.W YORK, NMtsNtK MFX1CO INST. (If MINING, CMC=ClTy OF CHICAGO WATEP PURIFICATION LABORATORY. MDH = MINN. DEPT. OF HEALT
UMO«UNIV. OF MINN,, DULUTH
-------
06-22-79
STATE CITY
PAGE 4
ID TYPE SOURCE MILES DATE AMPHIBOLE CHRYSOTILE BLANK MET L»B
A-C PIPE COLLECTED HFL MFL MFL
REF
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
MAPIN
MARIN,
MARIN
MARIN
MAPIN,
MAPIN,
MARIN, MILL VALLEY
MAPIN, MILL VALLEY
MARIN, MILL VALLEY
MARIN, MluWD OFFICE
MAPIN, NICASIO
MAPIN, SAN ANSF.LMO
MAPIN, SAN GEPONOMO
MARIN, SAN GERONOMO
SAN GFRONOMO
SAN GFRONOMO
MAPIN, SAN GERONOMO
MAPIN, SAN GEPONOMO
SAN GEPONOMO
S»N GEPONOMO
MARIN, SAN RAFAEL
MARIN, SAN RAFAEL
MARIN, SAN RAFAEL
SAN RAFAEL
SAUSALITO
MAPIN, WOODACPE
MAPIN, WOOOACP.E
MARTINEZ
MARTINEZ
MARTINEZ
MARTINEZ
MAUSELEUM
MENLO PARK
MENLO PAPK
MENLO PARK
MENJjO PARK
MERCED, STORAGE 12
MERCED, STORAGE m
MILLBPAE
MILLBRAE
MILLBRAE C/H
MILLBPAE CITY
MII.LBRAE REC.
MILLBPAE SFWD
MILLBRAE SFWD
MILLBPAE SFWD
NEWARK, ALAMEDA CO.
NORTH MAPIN, NOVALTO
NORTH MAPIN, NOVALTO
NORTH MAPIN, STAFFORD
NORTH MARIN, STAFFORD
OAKLAND
OAKLAND
4347
4359
4745
4357
4301
4351B
4300
4352
4356
4768
47«6
4358
4355B
4354
4349
4742
4785
4822
4826
4823
4773
4770
4375
4374
4896
4887
37403
37402
4456
4453
4372
4369A
4368A
4747
4789
48)8
4607
4604
4606
4605
4319
D
D
D
R
D
R
R
F
F
F
F
F
D
D
D
D
D
F
F
D
D
D
D
F
F
D
D
0
D
D
D
D
R
F
D
D
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
W 0
w o
0
0
i
0
,00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
,00
.00
.00
.00
.14
.13
.00
.00
1
.00
.00
.80
.33
11/10/76
12/13/76
08/10/77
12/13/76
02/25/76
11/12/76
12/03/74
03/06/75
03/07/75
02/25/76
11/12/76
12/13/76
08/17/77
01/10/78
05/21/71
03/11/75
11/12/76
11/12/76
11/10/76
08/10/77
01/10/78
04/18/77
04/18/77
04/18/77
09/22/77
09/22/77
12/17/76
12/17/76
07/14/77
07/14/77
02/03/77
02/03/77
05/26/77
05/26/77
12/14/76
07/00/74
12/14/76
12/14/76
08/11/77
01/11/78
04/27/77
03/15/78
03/15/78
03/15/78
03/15/78
04/11/63
07/29/74
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
5
0
0
0
.020
.020
.025
,020
.050
.040
.020
.100
.500
.020
.200
.180
.020
.200
.100
.025
.020
.025
,025
.020
,050
.050
.025
,050
,010
,010
.250
,200
,160
,300
.150
.500
,500
.025
,600
,200
,000
,025
,050
.020
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
N
N
B
B
B
B
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
11
2
0
0
0
0
12
0
0
1
0
0
0
11
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
32
11
0
0
1
0
23
43
0
0
1
5
0
0
0
.040
.020
.100
.160
.250
.050
.000
.000
,000
.140
.040
.020
,700
,000
.020
.900
.350
.820
.020
.700
.000
.200
.025
,025
,025
.020
.800
.600
,075
,150
,050 B
.050 B
.000
,000
.240
.020
,700
,200
.000
,000
.450
.400
.600
.000
.025
.150
.020
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
0.010 M
0.010 M
M
M
M
B
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
EPC
EPC
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
AW
AW
AW
AW
AW
AW
AW
AW
AW
AW
AW
AW
AW
AW
AW
AW
AW
AW
AW
AW
AW
AW
AW
AW
AW
AW
AW
AW
AW
AW
AB
AB
AW
AW
AW
AL
AW
AW
AW
AW
AW
AW
AW
AW
AW
AW
AW
(TYPE) F*f IN1SHEO AT SOURCE 0*0 TSTPIBUTION RaRA* FiPLANT DISCHARGE F.FFLUENT
(SOURCE) SsSURFACE, W«WELL, CsCtSTERN, B=COMB1NED
(B/N) B*BFLOW DF.TFCTION LIMIT NsNUT STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT
(METHODi) MsMTLLIPORE CONO. WASH., NsNUCLKPOHE, JAFFF, D=DROP, L«MILLIPORF JAFFE-WICK, B*OOUBLE NUCLEPORE FILTER
(LAB) EPCsEPA, CINCINNATI FPDaFPA, UULUTH EPG=£PA, ATHENS, GA MCC*MCCRONE ASSOCIATES, UIL«UNIVEPSITY OF ILLINOIS, DOW«
DOW CHFMICAL, M1DLANP, MI., UCBiD. OF CALIF., BFKK E'LtY. HISsHlSC. DEPT, OF NATURAL RESOURCES, UWAsll. WASH,, SEATTLE, MSS« Ml,
SINAI HOSP., NFW YORK, NMIrNfcW MEXICO INST. Clt MINJNG, CMCsCITY OF CHICAGO WATER PURIFICATION LABORATORY, MDH = MINN. DEPT. OF HEALT
UMDsUNIV, OF MINN., OULUTH
-------
06-22
STATE
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
-79
CITY
OAKLAND
OAKLAND
OAKLAND
OAKLAND
OAKLAND
OAKLAND
OAKLAND
OAKLAND
OAKLAND
OAKLAND
OAKLAND
OAKLAND
OAKLAND
OAKLAND
OLD RIVER
OLD RIVER
ORtNDA
OP1NDA
ORINOA
ORINDA
OPINDA
OPINDA
OP-INDA
ORINDA
PACIFICA
PACIFICA
PACIFICA
PATTERSON, ALAMEDA CO.
PIEDMONT
PINDLE
PITTS8UPG
PITTSBURG
PITTSRUPG
PITTSBURG
PITTSBURG
PITTSBURG, ASBESTOS PAPER PLNT
PLEASANT HILL
PLEASANT HILI
PLEASONTON, ALAMEDA CO.
PLEASONTON, ALAMEDA CO.
PLFASONTON. ALAMEDA co.
PLEASONTON, ALAMEDA co.
REDDING
REDDING
REDDING
REDDING
REDDING
ID
4332B
4331B
4333B
4859
41458
4852
4050
4861
4871
4869
4865
4898
4764
4323B
4324B
4330B
4814
4813
4809
4806
4841
4611
4610
4866
4873
4872
4783
4870
4327
16922
4309
4308
4307
4824
4831
4438
4602
4601
4784
4603
ly
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
R
R
F
F
F
D
D
F
F
R
D
D
D
F
D
D
F
D
D
F
r
D
D
D
R
F
R
R
F
SOURCE
MILES DATE AMPHIBOLE
A-C PIPE COLLECTED HFL
PAGE 5
CNRYSOTILE BLANK MET LAB
MFL MFL
REF
0.00
0.00
1 .80
0.33
0.00
0.35
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.00
0,00
0.00
P. 00
0.20
0.55
0.00
4.00
2.00
0.00
0.00
7
2.80
2. BO
07/29/74 B
09/23/76
09/23/76
09/25/76
06/21/77
06/21/77
06/21/77
06/21/77 B
06/22/77 B
06/22/77
06/22/77
06/22/77
07/19/77 B
08/12/77
08/14/7b
09/14/76
09/23/76
01/27/77
01/27/77
01/27/77 B
01/27/77 B
06/20/77 B
04/04/78
04/04/78 B
07/05/77 B
07/05/77
07/05/77 B
01/09/78
06/22/77
09/23/76 B
08/28/74 B
08/13/76
08/13/76
08/13/76
04/18/77 B
03/04/75 B
04/18/77
05/11/77 B
02/28/78
02/28/78
02/2)1/78 B
03/02/75 B
03/02/75 B
09/03/75 B
09/03/75 B
09/03/75
0.025
0,250
0.550
0.150
0.500
0,400
0.300
0.100
0,100
0.400
0.200
0.400
0,050
0.025
3.000
2,000
0.300
0.700
0.600
0.100
0,100
0,050
0.067
0.800
0.050
0.025
0,025
0.050
0,400
0.016
0.010
0,100
0.050
0.040
0.025
0.900
0.025
0.012
0.050
0.200
0.150
0.025
1.260
0.500
0.630
0.550
0.840
B
B
B
B
B
B
N
B
B
B
B
B
B
0.025
0.200
0.200
0.150
0,100
0.300
0.500
0,600
0,200
0.200
0.900
1.000
0.050
0.180
49.000
18,000
0.250
0,300
0,500
0,100
0,100
0.050
0,067
0,800
0,750
0,380
0,350
2.100
0,800
0.032
0.070
0.400
0.200
0,760
0,050
0.900
1.900
0.038
0,100
1.400
1 ,600
0.025
1.260
0.500
0.630
0.550
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
N
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
EPC
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
MCC
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
MCC
MCC
MCC
MCC
MCC
AN
AH
AM
An
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AW
AM
AM
AM
AM
AW
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AW
AM
AA
AM
AM
AM
AM
AD
AH
AM
AW
AW
AW
AW
AD
AD
AD
AD
AD
(TYPE) FsFINISHED AT SOURCE D»DT5TRIBUTION RsRAW EiPLANT DISCHARGE EFFLUENT
(SOURCE) S«SURFACE, WxWELL, C«CISTERN, B=CO*BINED
(B/N) BsBELOW DETECTION LIMIT NaNOT STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT
(METHODi) MsMTLLIPORE COND. WASH., NaNUCLEPOKE OAFFE, DsDROP, LzMlLLIPORE JAFFE-WICK, BsDOUBLE NUCLEPORE FILTER
(LAB) EPC»EPA, CINCINNATI EPDsEPA, DULUTH EPGsEPA, ATHENS, GA MCCsMCCRONE ASSOCIATES, UILxUNIVEPSITY OF ILLINOIS, DOW«
DOW CHEMICAL, MIDLAND, MI., UCB«U. OF CALIF,, RF.RKFLEY, W1S = WISC. DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES, UWAsU. WftSH., SEATTLE, MSS" MT,
SINAI HOSP., NEW YORK, NMUNEW MEXICO INST. OF MINING, CMC=CITY OF CHICAGO WATER PURIFICATION LABORATORY, MDH»MINN. DEPT. OF HEALT
UMDBUNIV. OF MINN., DULUTH
-------
ID TYPE SOURCE
C»
4373
4380
4379
4890
4805
4888
4886
4317
4864
4772
4711
4715
4712
4718
4717
4716
24672
4815
4454
4466
4460
4766
4788
4457
4459
4458
4463
4371
4370
4467
4891
4889
4779
4780
4385
4767
4883
4880
R
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
0
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
F
R
F
F
F
F
D
0
MILES
A-C PIPE
0.45
7
0.07
0.45
0.07
0.50
1.20
2.70
3.90
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.30
3.00
3.00
3.30
?
?
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
DATE AMPHIBOLE
COLLECTED
09/03/75
12/17/76
07/00/74
12/17/76
12/17/76
07/14/77 B
07/14/77 B
07/14/77
07/14/77
07/01/74 B
12/17/76 B
06/22/77 B
09/22/77 B
07/07/77
07/07/77 B
07/07/77 B
07/07/77
07/07/77 B
07/07/77
04/01/7S B
02/17/76 B
05/26/77 B
05/26/77 B
05/26/77
08/17/77
01/11/78 B
05/26/77 B
05/26/77 B
05/26/77 B
05/26/77 B
12/14/76
12/14/76
05/26/77 B
07/14/77
07/14/77 B
12/06/77 B
12/06/77 B
01/09/75 B
09/10/75 B
03/05/75 B
05/00/75 B
12/20/76 B
08/15/77
03/05/75 B
09/10/75 B
07/12/77 B
07/12/77
MFL
8.600
0.400
0.300
0.280
0.100
0.025
0.025
0,074
0.033
0.050
0.050
0.025
0,075
0.100
0.025
0.150
0.025
0.050
0.040
0.250
0.025
0.025
0.050
0.050
0.025
0.025
0.025
0.025
0.025
0,120
0.040
0.200
0.084
0,100
0.200
0.200
0.020
0.300
0.220
0.050
0.050
0.200
0.400
0,250
2.500
CHRYSOTILE
MFL
0.550
B 0.020
0.400
0.400
0.200
0.025
0.025
1.600
B 0.033
B 0.050
0.100
B 0.025
0.300
0.400
1,500
0.200
0.150
4.000
N 0.200
1.900
0.400
0.320
0.800
0.930
0.7CO
B 0.025
0.075
0.600
B 0.025
2.200
0.680
16.000
6.400
6.000
12.000
19.000
1.500
B 0.300
B 0.220
0.490
0.050
0.200
B 0.200
B 0.400
26.000
44.000
PAGE 6
BLANK MET LAB
MFL
KEF
06-22-79
STATE CITY
CA REDDING
CA PFDWOOD
CA REDWOOD CITY
CA REDWOOD CITY
CA REDWOOD CITY
CA REDWOOD CITY
CA REDWOOD CITY
CA REDWOOD CITY
CA REDWOOD TITY
CA PEDWOOD CWD
CA REDWOOD SCHOOL
CA RICHMOND
CA S. FRAN, E. BAY, WEAPONS BASE
CA S. SAN FRANCISCO
CA S. SAN FRANCISCO
CA S. SAN FRANCISCO
CA S. SAN FRANCISCO
CA S. SAN FRANCISCO
CA S. SAN FPAHCISCO
CA SACRAMENTO, ARCADE CO.
CA SAN ANDREAS
CA SAN ANDREAS
CA SAN ANDREAS
CA SAN ANDREAS
CA SAM ANDREAS
CA SAN ANDREAS
CA SAN BRUNO
CA SAN BRUNO
CA SAN BRUNO
CA SAN BRUNO
CA SAN BRUNO SCHOOL
CA SAN BRUNO SCHOOL
CA SAN CARLOS
CA SAN CARLOS
CA SAN CARLOS
CA SAN CARLOS
CA SAN CARLOS
CA SAN FRANCISCO
CA SAN FRANCISCO
CA SAN'FRANCISCO, ALAMEDA E. PORT
CA SAN FRANCISCO, ALAMEDA E. PORT
CA SAN FRANCISCO, ALAMEDA E.PORT
CA SAN FRANCISCO, ALAMEOA E.PORT
CA SAN FRANCISCO, ALAMENDA EAST
CA SAN FRANCISCO, ALAMENDA EAST
CA SAN FRANCISCO, B-IO 1384 31ST
CA SAN FRANCISCO, B-ll 2600 MORO
CTYPE) FaFINISHED AT SOURCE D=niSTPlBUTION RsRAW ErPLANT DISCHARGE EFFLUENT
(SOURCE) SsSURFACE. WsWELL, C=CISTERN, B=COMBINED
(B/N) BsBELOW DFTFCTION LIMIT NsNOT STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT
(METHOD!) MrMILMPOPE COND. *ASH., N=NUCLEPOHE JAFFE, D*DPOP, LaMILLIPORE JAFFE-WICK, BsUOUBLE NUCLEPORE FILTER
(LAB) EPCzEPA, CINCINNATI EPDiFPA, UULUTH EPGsEPA, ATHENS, GA MCCeMCCRONE ASSOCIATES, UIL«UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS, DOW*
DOW CHEMICAL, MIDLAND, MT . . UCB*U. OF CALIF,, BEPKFLFY, V"IS*WISC. DEPT, OF NATURAL RESOURCES, UWA»U. MASH., SEATTLE, MSS" MT.
SINAI HOSP,, NfW YORK, NMIsNpW MEXICO INST. of MINING, CMC=CITY OF CHICAGO WATER-PURIFICATION LABORATORY, MDH*MINN, DEPT. OF HE*LT
UMD»UNIV, OF MINN., OULUTH
M MCC
M UCB
B UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M EPC
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
f UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M EPC
M MCC
M UCB
M EPC
M UCB
M UCB
M MCC
M HCC
M UCB
M UCB
AD
AH
Al
AM
AN
AM
AW
AM
AM
AW
AN
AW
AN
AM
AM
AN
AN
AH
AM
AA
AW
AW
AN
AH
AM
AW
AH
AH
AH
AW
AW
AH
AM
AM
AH
AH
AM
AA
AC
AH
AH
AW
AH
AC
AC
AH
AH
-------
06-27-79
STATE
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CITY
SAN FRANCISCO,
SAN FRANCISCO,
SAN FRANCISCO,
SAN FRANCISCO,
SAN FRANCISCO,
SAN FRANCISCO,
SAN FRANCISCO,
SAN FRANCISCO,
SAN FRANCISCO,
SAN FRANCISCO,
SAN FRANCISCO,
SAN FRANCISCO,
SAN FRANCISCO,
SAN FRANCISCO,
SAN FRANCISCO,
SAN FRANCISCO,
SAN FRANCISCO,
SAN FRANCISCO,
SAN FRANCISCO,
SAN FRANCISCO,
SAN FRANCISCO,
SAN FRANCISCO,
SAN FRANCISCO,
SAN FRANCISCO,
SAN FRANCISCO,
SAN FRANCISCO,
SAN FRANCISCO,
SAN FRANCISCO,
SAN FRANCISCO,
SAN FRANCISCO,
SAN FRANCISCO,
SAN FRANCISCO,
SAN FRANCISCO,
SAN FRANCISCO,
SAN FRANCISCO,
SAN FRANCISCO.
SAN FRANCISCO,
SAN FRANCISCO,
SAN FRANCISCO,
SAN FRANCISCO,
SAN FRANCISCO,
SAN FRANCISCO,
SAN FRANCISCO,
SAN FRANCISCO,
SAN FRANCISCO,
SAN FRANCISCO,
SAN FRANCISCO,
BARNAL HGTS
BL-1 2908 KTR
BL-2 1207 330
BL-3 2945 LIN
BL-44,6 3015 J
BL-5 28TH
BL-72629 JUn
BL-9 2822 MQR
BL-9 3128 1PV
CALAVERAS PES
CALAVEPAS RFS
CALAVERAS RES
CISTERN BUCH/CA
CIVTC CENTER
COL HILL SYS1
COL HILL 1 HOS
CRYSTAL SP. RES
CRYSTAL SPRING
CRYSTAL SPRINGS
HETCH.HETCHY
HETCH.HETCHY
HETCH.HETCHY
KIEPNEY/MERCHNT
L, CRYSTAL PES
L. CRYSTAL PCS
L. CRYSTAL RES
L. CRYSTAL PES
L. CRYSTAL RES
LIVEPMORE LAB
LOM-BPOD. RES
LOMBARD SYS
LOMBARD SYS
MER MANOR SYS
MERCED SYS 2
PICARCITOS RES
PORTRERO HGTS
POTPERO HGT520
SAN ANDREAS
SAN ANDPEAS
SAN ANDPEAS
SAN ANDREAS FP
SAN ANDREAS FP
SAN ANDPEAS FP
SAN ANDPEAS PES
SAN ANDPEAS RICS
SAN ANDPEAS RES
SAN ANDREAS RFS
PAGE 7
ID IYPE SOURCE MILES DATE AMPHIBOLE CHRYSOTILE BLANK MET LAB
A-C PIPE COLLECTED MFL MFL MFL
REF
4816 D
4876 D
4877 D
4R81 D
4884 D
4878 D
4879 D
4875 D
4882 D
R
R
4397 R
4343B F
4344 F
4760
4394 D
F
23219 D
F
D
D
23221 D
4342C F
R
R
R
F
R
F
4389 D
4761 D
43R8 D
4749
P
4755 D
4381 D
F
23214 F
F
4366 F
4365 R
4367 F
F
F
P
F
(TYPE) F*FINISHEn AT SOURCE D«OISTRIBUTlON RsRAM EsPLANT DISCHARGE EFFLUENT
(SOURCE) SZSURFACE. NSWELL. C»CISTEHN, R*COMBII»ED
(B/N) RaBELOW DETECTION LIMIT N«NDT STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT
(METHonn MBMTLMPOPE COND, HASH., N=NUCLEPOHE JAKFE, DBDROP, LsMitLiPtint JAFFE-WICK, B*DOUBLE NUCLEPORE FILTER
(LAB) EPC»EPA, CINCINNATI EPDsfPA, DULl'TH EPG*EPA, ATHt.NS, GA MCC=MCCRONE ASSOCIATES, UILaUNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS, DOM«
DOM CHEMICAL, MlDLANn, MI., UCRrll. (IK CALIF., Bf.RKKLtY, WIS = W)SC. DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES, UwAsU. WASH,, SEATTLE, MSS« MT.
SINAI HfiSP., NEM YORKf NMI = NKW MEXICO INST. fit MINING, CMC=C1TY UF CHICAGO WATEH PURIFICATION LABORATORY. MDHBMINN, DEPT, OF HEALT
tiMnztiNTv rtr MINN.. DIIMITM
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
?
.00
.00
.00
7
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
02/17/77
07/12/77
07/12/77
07/12/77
07/12/77
07/12/77
07/12/77
07/12/77
07/12/77
03/05/75
05/00/75
12/20/76
<00/00/08
<00/00/60
08/11/77
12/20/76
01/22/75
06/05/75
09/10/75
07/00/73
07/00/74
06/05/75
<00/00/53
03/05/75
03/05/75
05/00/75
05/24/76
05/24/76
05/00/75
12/20/76
08/11/77
12/20/76
08/11/77
03/05/75
08/11/77
12/20/76
03/05/75
06/04/75
09/10/75
12/14/76
12/14/76
12/14/76
07/01/74
03/05/75
03/05/75
05/00/75
B
B
B
B
B
N
B
B
B
N
B
N
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
45
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
4
t
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
.050
.200
.330
.500
.200
,600
.200
,600
.200
.000
.400
.050
.020
.300
.100
.067
,070
.500
.070
.050
,JOO
.300
.000
.400
.050
.200
.150
.330
.500
.800
.150
.050
.010
.500
.320
.080
.080
.100
.050
.100
0.
14.
24.
55.
20.
15.
14.
58.
13.
240.
61.
30.
0.
0.
10.
0.
4.
0.
B 0.
1.
0.
0.
B 0.
71.
180.
1.
130.
60.
3.
0.
21.
1.
38.
B 2.
15.
1.
B 0,
1.
B 0,
1.
J.
3.
B 0.
B 0.
B
1.
500
300
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
700
000
800
140
000
980
700
400
500
000
200
500
050
000
000
480
000
000
780
250
000
800
000
500
000
800
050
400
500
400
700
400
100
050
420
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
B
B
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
EPC
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
EPC
HCC
UCB
UCB
EPC
UCB
UCB
UCB
EPC
UCB
UCB
UCB
EPC
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
HCC
EPC
HCC
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
EPC
AN
AM
AM
AM
AW
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AH
AM
AM
AM
AM
AB
AC
AL
AL
AB
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
Ati
AH
AH
AM
AM
AH
AH
AH
AH
AC
AB
AC
AH
AH
AH
AH
AH
AH
AH
-------
PAGE 8
ID TYPE SOURCE MILES DATE AMPHIBOLE CHRYSOTILE BLANK MET LAB
A-C PIPE COLLECTED MFL MFL MFL
REF
O1
O
06-22-79
STATF. CITlf
CA SAN FRANCISCO, SAN ANDREAS RF.S
CA SAN FRANCISCO, SAN ANTONIO RES
CA SAN FRANCISCO, SAN ANT
CA SAN FRANCISCO, SF MED SCHOOL
CA SAN FRANCISCO, STANFORD HGTS
CA SAN FRANCISCO, STAMFORD HGTS
CA SAN FRANCISCO, SUNSET SYS t
CA SAN FRANCISCO, SUNSET SYS
CA SAN FRANCISCO, SUNSET SYS
CA SAN FRANCISCO, SUNSET SYS
CA SAN FRANCISCO, SUNSET SYS
CA SAN FRANCISCO, SUNSET SYS
CA SAN FRANCISCO, SUNSET SYS
CA SAN FRANCISCO, SUNSET SYS
CA SAN FRANCISCO, SUTRO II
CA SAN FRANCISCO, SUTPO II
CA SAN FRANCISCO, SUTRO 14
CA SAN FRANCISCO, SUTRO 14
CA SAN FRANCISCO, UCSF MED SCH
CA SAN FRANCISCO, UNIV MND RES1
CA SAN FRANCISCO, UNIV MND RES)
CA SAN FRANCISCO, UNIV MND RES2
CA SAN FRANCISCO, UNIV MND RES2
CA SAN FRANCISCO, UNIV MND SYSl
CA SAN FRANCISCO, UNIV MND SYS4
CA SAN FRANCISCO, UNIV MND SY56
CA SAN FRANCISCO, UNIV MND 1
CA SAN FRANCISCO, UNIV MND S
CA SAN FRANCISCO, UNIV MND 6
CA SAN FRANCISCO, UNIV MOUND PES
CA SAN FRANCISCO, UNIV, MOUND
CA SAN FRANCISCO, 100 CAL. ST.
CA SAN FRANCISCO, 100 CAL. ST.
CA SAN FRANCISCO, tOO CAL, ST.
CA SAN JOAOUIN
CA SAN JOAQUIN
CA SAN JOAOUIN
CA SAN JOAOUIN
CA SAN JOSE
CA SAN JOSE, ALAMEDA CO.
CA SAN LEANDRO
CA SAN LEANDRO
CA SAN LEANDRO
CA SAN LEANDRO
CA SAN LEANDRO
CA SAN LEANDRO
CA SAN LEANDRO
(TYPE) F«FINISHED AT SOURCE D*DTSTRIBUTION paRAW E=PLANT PISCHARGE EFFLUENT
(SOURCE) S«SURFACE, W»WELL. CSCISTERN, BSCOMBINEP
(B/N) B«BELOW DETECTION LIMIT N«NOT STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT
(METHOD!) M*MTLLIPORt COND, HASH,. NSNUCLEPOHE JAFFE, DsDROP, L=MILLIPORE JAFFE-WICK, RsDOUBLE NUCLEPORE KILTER
(LAB) EPC»EPA, CINCINNATI EPDxEPA, DULUTH EPGsEPA, ATHENS, GA MCCaMCCRONE ASSOCIATES, UIL»UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS, DOWa
DOW CHEMICAL, MIDLAND, MI., UCB«U. OF CALIF., BERKELEY, WISaWISC, UEPT. UF NATURAL RESOURCES, UWAaU. WASH., SEATTLE, MSB" MT.
SINAI HOSP., NEW YORK, NMIsNEW MEXICO JN5T. Of MINING, CMCacm OK CHICAGO WATER PUBLICATION LABORATORY, MDH = MINN. DEPT. OF HEALT
UMD*UNIV. OF MINN., DULUTH
1 RES
1 RES
1 RES
IOL
ITS
ITS
t
i
i
i
4
4
7
P
H
81
SI
:S2
:s2
SI
S4
56
PES
i
4437
4399
4753
4387
47SO
4384
4762
4391
4751
4754
4396
4390
4752
439S
4756
4318A
4392
4759
4393
4758
4746
4757
4748
4386
4383
4382
23220
4820
4820A
4821
4821A
4834
4340
4339
4338
4860
4857
R
R
R
D
D
D
D
D
F
F
F
F
D
D
F
D
D
D
D
R
R
R
R
D
F
D
D
D
D
F
D
D
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0,00
0.00
0,00
7
0.00
0,00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0,00
0.40
0.00
0.40
0.00
0.45
0.00
05/00/75 8
03/05/75 N
05/00/75 B
05/17/77
12/20/76 B
08/11/77
12/20/76
08/11/77
12/20/76
08/11/77 B
12/20/76
08/11/77
08/11/77
12/20/76
12/20/76 B
08/11/77
12/20/76 B
08/11/77
<00/00/64
12/20/76 B
08/11/77
12/20/76
08/11/77
08/11/77
08/11/77 B
08/11/77 B
12/20/76
12/20/76
12/20/76 B
05/00/75 B
06/05/75 B
06/00/73 B
07/24/74 B
12/00/74 B
03/09/77 B
03/09/77 B
03/10/77
03/10/77 B
07/00/74
04/27/78 B
07/29/74 B
07/29/74 8
10/07/76 B
10/07/76 B
10/07/76
06/21/77
06/21/77 B
0.560
0.400
0.250
1.300
0.100
1.000
0.100
0.170
0.100
3.200
0.050
0.075
0.050
0.500
0.100
0.330
0.400
0.050
0.250
0.100
0.250
1.700
0.330
0.330
0,050
0,050
0.050
0.010
0.060
0,067
0.067
0.200'
1.000
0.400
2.500
0.025
0.010
0.020
0.020
0.016
0.016
0.200
0.050
3.490
N 0.560
0.360
22.000
0.500
23.000
0.200
38.000
2.300
16.000
1.400
38.000
24.000
0.780
0,500
27.000
0.100
70.000
1.600
B 0.550
23.000
0,250
30.000
30.000
32.000
31.000
0.500
0.650
0.500
0.360
3.800
1,000
0.200
1.540
B 0.200
B 1.000
0.400
2.500
B 0.010
0.025
B 0.010
B 0.020
B 0.020
0.140
B 0.016
2.000
0.100
M EPC
M UCB
M EPC
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M EPC
M EPC
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
B UIC
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
AN
AW
AM
AW
AM
AN
AW
AW
AW
AW
AW
AW
AW
AW
AW
AW
AW
AW
AW
AW
AW
AW
AW
AW
AW
AW
AW
AN
AW
AW
AB
AW
AW
AW
AW
AW
AW
AW
AL
AW
AW
AW
AW
AW
AW
AW
AW
-------
SOURCE MILES DATE AMPHIBOLE
A-C PIPE COLLECTED MFL
PAGE 9
CHRYSOTILE BLANK MET LAB
MFL MFL
REF
0.010
06-22-79
STATE CITY ID TYPE
CA SAN LEANDRO
CA SAN LOUIS OBISPO
CA SAN MATED
CA SAN MATED
CA SAN MATED
CA SAN MATED
CA SAN MATED co., BURLINGAMC
CA SAN MATED CO., LIVERMORE LAB
CA SAN MATED co., IIVERMORE LAB
CA SAN MATED SFWD CHEM LAB
CA SAN PABLO
CA SAN PABLO
CA SAN PABLO
CA SAN RAMON
CA SAN RAMON
CA SOBRANTE
CA SOBRANTE
CA SOBRANTE
CA SOBRANTE
CA SOBRANTE
CA SOBRANTE
CA SOBRANTE
CA SOBRANTE
CA SOUTHERN CALIF., CRA
CA SOUTHERN CALIF., CRA
CA SOUTHERN CALIF,, SMP
CA STANISLAUS RIV., CALAVERAS CO.
CA TRINITY RIVER, DOUGLAS
CA WALNUT CREEK
CA WALNUT CPEEK
CA WALNUT CREEK
CA WALNUT CREEK
CA WALNUT CREEK
CA WALNUT CREEK
CA WALNUT CPEEK
CA WEAVERVILLE
CA WEAVFRVtLLE
CA WEAVFRVILLE
CA WEAVERVILLE
CO BOULDER 12630
CO DENVER, MARSTON
CO DENVER, MARSTON
CO DENVER, MARSTON CONDUIT
CO DENVER, MARSTON CONDUIT
CO DENVER, MARSTON CONDUIT 20
(TYPE) F«FINISHED |T SOURCE D«DISTP18UTION P«RAW E«PLANT DISCHARGE EFFLUENT
(SOURCE) 3»s«Rr»cE, W«WELL, C»CISTEFN, B»COMBINED
(B/N) B«BELOW DETECTION LIMIT N«NOT STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT
(METHODI) M»MILLIPORE COND. WASH., NSNUCLEPOPE JAFFE, D«DROP, L=MILLIPORE JAFFE-WICK, B=DOUBLE NUCLEPORE PILTEH
(LAB) EPC»EPA, CINCINNATI EPO«EPA, DULUTH EPG«EPA, ATHENS, GA MCC = MCCRONE. ASSOCIATES, Ult-sUNIVtPSITY OF ILLINOIS, DQW«
DOW CHEMICAL, MIDLAND, MI., UCBsU. OF CALIF., BERKELEY, WIS=wISC. DEPT, OF NATURAL RESOURCES, IUA=U. WASH., SEATTLE, HSS= MT,
SINAI HOSP,, NEW YORK, NMI»NEW MEXICO INST. Of MINING, CMC=CITY OF CHICAGO WATER PURIFICATION LABORATORY, MDH=M1NN. DEPT. Of HEALT
UMD«UNIV. OF MINN., DULUTH
4856
37324
4866
4892
4895
4774
434SA
4455
4325
4810
4862
4843
4849
4329B
4328B
4326B
4846
4613
4612
4334B
4336
4335
4802
4828
4847
F
F 8
0
D
D
D
D
D
D
F
F
F
D
D
D
D
D
D
F
F
F
R
F
F
F
R 8
R S
D
R
D
F
D
D
F
R
F
R
F
0.00
0.00
0.90
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.50
1.10
0,00
0.35
0.00
0.35
0.00
0.00
0,00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.15
0,00
0.30
0,90
0.00
06/21/77 B
02/10/77 B
07/05/77 B
07/14/77
07/14/77
11/17/77 B
07/01/74 B
05/29/74 B
11/09/76 B
05/26/77 B
09/23/76 B
01/27/77 B
06/22/77 B
06/20/77
06/20/77
07/29/74 B
07/29/74 B
09/23/76 B
09/23/76
09/26/76 B
06/20/77 B
04/06/78 B
04/06/78 B
07/00/74
07/00/74
07/00/74
06/00/77 B
06/00/77 B
12/10/74 B
10/07/76
10/07/76 B
10/07/76
01/27/77
04/18/77 B
Ob/20/77 B
03/02/75 B
03/02/75
09/02/75
09/02/75
08/28/74 B
09/15/75
09/15/75 B
02/26/75 B
02/26/75 N
02/26/75 8
0.050
0.010
0,050
1.000
0.500
0.025
0.033
0.067
0.050
0.200
0,016
0.020
0.025
0,050
0,200
0,010
0,020
0,020
0.040
0.008
0.025
1.000
0.500
0,063
0.063
0.025
0.600
0.020
0.040
0.300
0,025
0.050
4.800
2,850
0.410
0.020
0.500
0.200
0.060
0.250
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
N
B
B
B
B
0.050
0.010 B
0,050
31.000
50.000
0.050
0.033
0.067
0.200
22.000
0.084
0.020
0,150
0.3SO
0,500
0,010
0,020
0.006
0,020
0.016
0.025
2.000
0.500
0,020
0.020
0.020
0.063
0.063
0.025
0.400
0.020
0.020
0.100
0.050
0.050
4.800
4.500
4.800
0.020
1.500
0,500
0.200
0.010
0.250
M UCB
M EPC
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
B UCB
B UCB
B UCB
M MCC
M MCC
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M UCB
M MCC
M MCC
M MCC
M MCC
M EPC
M MCC
M MCC
M MCC
M UCB
M MCC
AW
AB
AW
AW
AW
AW
AW
AW
AW
AW
AW
AW
AW
AW
AW
AW
AN
AW
AK
AW
AW
AW
AW
AL
AL
AL
AZ
AZ
AW
AW
AW
AW
AW
AW
AW
AD
AD
AD
AD
AA
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
-------
06-22-79
STATE CITY
ID 1YPE SOURCE
MILES DATE AMPHIBOLE
A-C PIPE COLLECTED MFL
PAGE 10
CHRYSOTILE BLANK MET LAB
MFL MFL
01
K)
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
DENVER, MARSTON CONDUIT 20
DENVER, MOFFAT
DENVER, MOFFAT
DFNVER, MOFFAT
DENVER, MOFFAT
DENVER, MOFFAT
DENVER, MOFFAT
DENVER, MOFFAT
DENVER, MOFFAT
ANSONIA
ANSONIA
AVON, AVON «.C, WELL 2
AVON, AVON M.C, WELL 4
AVON, AVON W.C. WELL 4
AVON, AVON W.C. WELL2
AVON, CONN, W.C.
AVON, FAP.MINGTON WOODS
AVON, FARMINGTON WOODS
AVON, FARMINGTON MOODS
BEACON FALLS
BERLIN, KENSINGTON
BERLIN, KENSINGTON
BERLIN, WORTHINGTON
BERLIN, WORTHINGTON
BLOOMFIELD, BURR
BLOOMFIELD, BURR
BLOOMFIELO, BURP
BLOOMFIELD, GRANT HILL
BLOOMFIELO, GRANT HILL
BLOOMFIELD, GRANT HILL
BLOOMFIELD,
BLOOMFIF.LO,
BLOOMFIELO,
WELL HOUSE
WELL HOUSE
WELL HOUSE
BRANFORD, (L. GAILLARD)
BRIDGEPORT, EA8TON
BRIDGEPORT, HEMLOCK
BRIDGEPORT, HEMLOCK
BRIDGEPORT, HEMLOCK
BRIDGEPORT, HEMLOCK
BRIDGEPORT, HEMLOCK
BRIDGEPORT, TRAP FALLS
BRISTOL
BPOOKFIELD, BROOKACRES
BROOKFIELD, BROOKACP-ES
BPOOKFIELD, BUTTERNUT RIDGE
31320
37501
36600
37532
37533
37534
37531
36574
36580
36581
36580
36566
36506
36507
36488
36489
26190
32974
40603
26192
32973
40601
26191
32972
40602
36549
37589
37577
37578
37578
37580
37579
37590
37S56
36554
36553
36544
R
R
F
R
D
F
F
F
D
D
D
D
F
D
D
D
F
F
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
F
F
F
F
F
F
D
D
D
D
F
F
D
F
F
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.30
.CO
,00
,00
,80
.90
.10
.00
.00
.00
.20
.60
.00
,00
.10
.20
.20
.20
.10
.10
.10
.00
.00
.00
,00
.00
.00
.30
.30
.20
.50
.00
.00
.30
,00
.00
02/26/75
02/26/75
02/26/75
02/26/75
02/26/75
03/18/75
09/15/75
09/15/75
09/15/75
03/23/77
03/23/77
04/12/77
04/12/77
04/12/77
04/12/77
03/09/77
03/16/77
03/16/77
03/16/77
03/09/77
02/15/77
02/15/77
02/02/77
02/02/77
07/31/75
10/07/75
12/09/75
07/31/75
10/07/75
12/09/78
07/31/75
10/07/75
12/09/75
02/28/77
05/24/77
05/17/77
05/17/77
05/17/77
05/17/77
05/17/77
05/24/77
05/10/77
03/02/77
03/02/77
02/24/77
N
B
B
B
B
B
P
B
B
B
B
B
B
N
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
8
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.220
,200
,050
.100
.250
.070
.500
.500
.500
.040
.040
,010
.010
,050
.010
.010
.020
.010
,100
.010
,010
.010
,030
,030
.010
.010
.010
.010
,010
.010
.010
.010
,010
,020
,200
,050
.100
.030
,040
,100
.060
.010
.010
.010
.010
B
B
B
B
N
B
B
B
N
B
B
B
B
N
B
N
N
N
N
B
B
N
B
B
B
N
B
B
B
B
N
N
B
B
N
B
B
B
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.200
.050
.too
.250
,400
.500
.500
.500
,100
.040
,010
.010
, 100
,090
,010
.200
.050
,500
,010
,050
.050
.200
.050
.200
.010
.010
.010
.010
.101
.010
.040
.010
.020
,200
.400
.100
,200
.200
.100
.060
.050
,010
.010
.010
N
N
N
N
N
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
0.040
0.020
0.020
0.020
0.020
0.020
0.010
0.030
0.030
0.200
0.050
0.100
0.030
0.040
0.100
0.060
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
N
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
N
M
M
N
M
N
M
M
M
MCC
MCC
MCC
MCC
MCC
EPC
MCC
MCC
MCC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
tPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AB
AC
AC
AC
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
(TYPF) FmFINISHED AT SOURCE 0«DISTRIBUTION R»RAW EaPLANT DISCHARGE EFFLUENT
(SOURCE) S«SURF*CE; W»WELL, COCISTERN, B»COMBINED
(8/N) B*6ELOW DETECTION LIMIT N»NOT STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT
(METHODI) M.MILLIPOPE COND, WASH., N«NUCLEPOHE JAFFE, D=DPOP/ L=MILLIPORE JAFFE-WICK, B=DOUBLE NUCLEPORE FILTER
(LAB) CPC-EPA, CINCINNATI EPDiEPA, DULUTH EPG = S,PA, ATHENS, GA MCC=MCCRONE ASSOCIATES, UILKINIVEPS ITY OF ILLINOIS, DOW =
DOW CHEMICAL, MIDLAND, MI., UCRsU. OF CALIF., BERKELEY, WIS=WISC. DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES, UWA=U. WASH,, SEATTLE, MSS« MT,
SINAI HOSP., NIT* YORK, NMI.NKW MFXICO INST, OF MINING, CMCsClTY OF CHICAGO WATER PURIFICATION LABORATORY, MDHsMINN, DEPT. OF HEALT
UMD»UNIV. OF MINN., DULUTH
-------
ID TYPE SOURCE
MILES DATE AMPHIBOLE
A-C PIPE COLLECTED MFL
PAGE 11
CHRYSOTILE BLANK MET LAB
MFL MFL
REF
01
06-22-79
STATE CITY
CT RROOKFIELD, BUTTERNUT RIDGE
CT BROOKFIELD. CANDLEWOOD
CT BROOKFIELD, CANDLEWOOD
CT BROOKFItLD, DANCON
CT BROOKFIELD, DANCON
CT BROOKFIELD, GPEENRIDGE
CT RROOKFIUD, INDIAN FIELDS §1
CT BROOKFIELD, INDIAN FIELDS It
CT BROOKFIELD, INDIAN FIELDS 12
CT BROOKFIELD, RURAL W.C.
CT BROOKFIELD, RURAL W.C.
CT BPOOKFIELD, RURAL W.C.
CT BROOKFIELD, RURAL W.C.
CT BROOKFIELD, WATER SOFTNCR
CT BROOKFIELDS, CEDAR HTS
CT RPOOKFIELDS, CEDAR HTS
CT BROOKLYN, CRYSTAL
CT BROOKLYN, CRYSTAL
CT BUPLINGTON
CT BURLINGTON
CT CANTON
CT CANTON
CT CHESHIRE
CT CLINTON, CHESTER
CT CLINTON, KELSEY
CT CLINTON, KELSEY
CT CLINTON, KELSEY
CT CLINTON, KELSEY
CT COLCHESTER, CUD 13
CT COLCHESTER, CWD «3
CT COLCHESTER, CWD 14
CT COLUMBIA
CT COLUMBIA
CT COVENTRY, COV. HILLS
CT COVENTRY, COV, HILLS
CT COVENTRY, EASTV1FW
CT COVENTRY, EASTV1F.W
CT COVENTRY, LAKEWOOD HTS.
CT COVENTRY, LAKEWOOD HTS.
CT COVENTRY, NORTHFIELD-VIL
CT COVENTRY, NOPTHFIELD-VIL
CT COVENTRY, PILGRIM HILLS
CT COVENTRY, PILGRIM HILLS
CT CROMWELL, F. D.
CT CPOMWELL, F. D.
CT CROMWELL, F, D.
CT CROMWELL, F. D.
(TYPE) F«FINISHED AT SOURCE D«DISTRIBUTION RSRA* F,«PLANT DISCHARGE EFFLUENT
(SOURCE) S»S1)RFACE, WsWELL, CsCISTERN, B«COMBINED
(B/N) B"BELOW DETECTION LIMIT NiNOT STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT
(METHOD:) M»MILLIPORE COND. WASH., NENUCLEPOKE JAFFE, DSOROP, L=MILLIPCRF JAFFE-WICK, B=DOUBLE NUCLFPORK
(LAB) EPC*£PA, CINCINNATI EPDsEPA. DULUTH SPGsEPA. ATHF.NS, GA MCCsMCCHONE ASSOCIATES. UIL = UNI VLHSITY OF ILLINOIS, DOWn
DOW CHFMICAL» MIDLAND. HI., UCBsU. OF CALIF,. BERKELEY, WISsWISC. DtPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES, UrtA=U. V"ASH.. SEATTLE. MSS* MI.
SINAI HOSP., NFW YORK, NMtsNF.W MEXICO INST. Of MINING, CMC=CITY uF CHICAOn WATER PURIFICATION LAHORAIOPY, MI)H = M1NN, DiPT. OF HEALT
UMn«UNIV. OF MINN., DULUTH
36599
36474
36473
36556
36555
37517
36564
36565
36S63
36562
36561
36560
36559
37518
36558
36557
36422
36423
36573
36572
36573
36575
37525
36498
36494
36497
36496
36495
36467
36469
36468
37541
37540
36585
36584
37551
37550
37553
37552
37555
37554
36583
36582
36404
36403
37611
37610
D
F
D
D
F
F
F
D
F
D
F
F
D
D
D
F
F
D
F
D
F
D
F
D
D
D
D
F
D
F
F
D
F
F
D
D
F
D
F
D
F
D
F
F
U
D
F
W
w
W
w
w
w
w
w
w
s
w
w
N
w
w
B
w
w
w
w
w
0.50
0,00
0.20
0.50
0.00
0.00
0,00
0.15
0.00
0.50
0,00
0.00
1,00
0,50
0.50
0.00
0,00
0,30
0.00
0.10
0.00
0.70
0.00
7
0.06
0.10
0.10
0,00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.70
0.00
0.00
0.50
0.20
0.00
0.20
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.10
0.00
0.00
1 .50
1.50
0.00
03/22/77
01/24/77
01/24/77
03/02/77
03/02/77
04/01/77
03/03/77
03/03/77
03/03/77
03/02/77
03/02/77
03/02/77
03/02/77
04/01/77
02/03/76
03/02/77
12/14/76
12/14/76
01/24/77
03/09/77
01/24/77
03/09/77
04/06/77
02/04/77
02/04/77
02/04/77
02/04/77
02/04/77
01/20/77
01/20/77
01/20/77
04/1B/77
04/18/77
03/17/77
03/17/77
05/05/77
05/05/77
05/05/77
05/05/77
05/09/77
05/09/77
03/17/77
03/17/77
12/09/76
12/09/76
07/11/77
07/11/77
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
R
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
P
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
0.010
0,010
0,010
0.010
0,010
0,010
0.010
0.010
0.010
0,010
0.010
0.010
0.010
0,010
0,010
0.010
0,010
0,010
0,010
0.010
0,010
0.010
0,030
0.020
0.020
0.040
0.030
0.010
0.020
0.020
0.020
0.010
0,010
0,500
0,100
0.500
0.500
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.010
N
N
N
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
N
B
B
B
N
N
B
N
N
N
N
B
N
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
N
B
N
B
B
B
B
B
0.050
0.200
0,050
0.050
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.100
0.010
0,010
0.050
0.100
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.050
0,050
0.010
0.050
0.060
0.200
0,050
0,020
0,200
0,030
0.010
0.020
0.020
0.020
0.010
0,010
0,500
0.100
0.500
0,500
0.010
0.010
0.050
0.010
0.050
0.010
0.010
0,010
0.010
0.010
B
N
N
B
B
N
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
0
B
B
B
B
B
0.010
0.010
0,010
0.010
0,010
0.030
0.020
0,020
0.040
0.020
0.010
0.020
0.020
0.020
o.oto
0.010
0.500
0.100
0.500
0.500
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.010
0,010
0.010
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
N
M
N
M
M
N
M
M
M
M
M
N
N
N
M
M
M
M
N
N
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
iPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
KPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AP
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
-------
ID TYPE SOURCE MILES DATE AMPHIBOLE
A-C PIPE COLLECTED MFL
PAGE 12
CHRY5QT1LE. BLANK MET LAB
MFL MFL
PEF
06-22-79
STATE CITY
CT DANBUPY, M. RIVEP
CT DANBURY, PEAPCE
CT DANBURY, PEARCE
CT DANBURY, RIDGEBURY
CT DANBUPY, RIDGCBURY
CT DANBURY, SHERWOOD
CT DANBURY, SHEPWOOD
CT DAN8URY, W. D,
CT DANBURY, «. D.
CT DANBURY, WILLOW RUN
CT OANBURY, WILLOW RUN
CT DARIEN
CT DAPIEN
CT DEEP RIVER, GUIL-CHESTER
CT DERBY
CT EAST HADDAM
CT EAST HAPTFOPD, MOC
CT EAST HAVEN, L, SALTESTALL
CT EAST LYMF
CT EAST LYME
CT EAST LYMF
CT EAST LYMF., DODGETOWN
CT EAST LYME, DODGETOWN
CT EAST WINDSOR, ROCKVILLE
CT EAST WINDSOR, ROCKVILLE
CT EASTON, SEE BRIDGEPORT
CT ELLINGTON, ACRES
CT ELLINGTON, ACRES
CT ELLINGTON, C«C
CT ELLINGTON, ROCKVILLE
CT ELLINGTON, ROCKVILLE
CT ENFIFLD, CWC
CT ENFIELD, CWC
CT ENFIELD, HAZARDVILLE
CT ENFIELD, HAZARDVILLE
CT FARMINGTON, UNIONVILLE
CT FARMINGTON, UNIONVILLE
CT FARMINGTON, UNIONVILLF
CT FARMINGTON, UNIONVILLE
CT FARMINGTON, UNIONVILLE
CT FARMINGTON, UNIONVILLE
CT FAPMINGTON, W. C.
CT FARMINGTflN, W. C.
CT GLASTONBURY
CT GLASTONBURY
CT GPANPY
CT GPANBY
fTYPE) F«FINISHED AT SOUPCF. D«DISTRIBUTION RsHAW F,*PL»NT DISCHARGE EFFLUENT
(SOURCE) S*8URFACE, W«WELL, C*CISTERN, 8«COMBINF.D
(B/N) B»BBLOW DETECTION LIMIT NaNQT ST'TTSTICALLY SIGNIFICANT
(METHODI) MmMILLIPORE COND. WASH., NrNUCLFPOHE JAFFE, n = DPOP, L = MlLLIPt)PF JAFFE-WICK, B = DOUBLE NUCLEPORE FILTEH
(LAB) EPC»EPA, CINCINNATI FPD.FPA, BULUTH EPG.EPA, ATHfcNS, GA MCCiMCCRdNE ASSOCIATES, UIL=UNIVKRS1TY OF ILLINOIS, DOW*
DOW CHEMICAL, MIDLAND, MI., UCRxU. OF CALIF., BIRKF.LKY, WIS=«1SC. DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES. U*A*U. MSH.. SEATTLE, MSS« MT.
SINAI HOSP,, NFW YORK, NMIsNEW MFXICO INST. OF MINING, CMC=C1TY OF CHICAGO HATEK PURIFICATION LAHORAIUHJ. MDH = MINN. DF.PT. OF HF.ALT
UMD«UNIV. OF MINN., DULUTH
36536
36529
36530
36459
36460
36S33
36534
36551
36552
36531
36532
36519
36520
36498
37607
37544
36579
36548
37512
37512
37511
37513
37514
37562
37565
37577
37574
37573
37593
37562
37563
37566
37567
37575
37576
37619
37618
37616
37617
37655
37656
37618
37619
36415
36416
36430
364)1
r
F
D
D
F
r
D
r
D
F
D
D
F
F
F
F
F
F
D
D
F
F
0
F
D
D
F
D
F
D
D
F
D
F
D
F
F
D
D
D
r
0
D
F
F
D
W
W
W
W
s
W
s
W
H
S
W
M
W
S
W
W
W
0.00
0.00
o.so
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.30
0.00
1.70
0.00
0.30
2.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.00
4.00
0.00
0.00
0.20
0.00
3.70
0.50
0.00
0.10
0.00
0.80
0.90
0.00
1.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
1 .00
1.00
0.00
0.50
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.70
02/24/77
02/24/77
02/24/77
01/12/77
01/12/77
02/24/77
02/24/77
03/01/77
03/01/77
02/24/77
02/24/77
02/22/77
02/22/77
01/20/77
06/13/77
04/02/77
03/15/77
02/28/77
03/31/77
03/31/77
03/31/77
03/31/77
03/31/77
05/13/77
05/13/77
05/l»i/77
05/16/77
05/25/77
05/13/77
05/13/77
05/13/77
05/13/77
05/16/77
05/16/77
00/00/77
00/00/77
07/13/77
07/13/77
12/27/77
12/27/77
07/13/77
07/13/77
12/11/76
12/11/76
12/17/76
12/17/76
B
R
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
R
B
0.030
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.010
o.oio
0.200
0.010
0.010
0.050
0,010
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.030
0,020
0.010
0.020
0.010
0.010
0,010
0.010
0.020
0.100
0.100
0.030
0.030
0.010
0.010
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.030
0,030
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.010
0,010
0,010
B
B
B
B
N
B
B
B
B
B
B
N
N
N
N
B
B
N
N
B
N
B
B
B
B
B
B
N
B
N
N
B
B
B
N
B
N
N
B
0.030
0,010 B
0.010 B
0.010 B
0.050 B
0.010 B
0.010 B
0.010 N
0.010 N
0,010 B
0.010 B
0.800 B
0.050 B
O.OSO
0.200 B
0.050
0.010
0.010
0.400 B
0.200 B
0.100 B
0.010 B
0.080 B
0.100
0.010 B
0,100 B
0.010 B
0.020 B
0.100 B
0.100
0.200 B
0.030 B
0.050 B
0.050 B
0.350 B
0.030 B
0,030 B
10.200 B
0.400
0.660
0.010
0.050
0.010
0.060
0.060
0.010
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
o.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
010
010
010
010
010
010
010
010
010
010
200
010
050
010
030
020
010
020
010
010
010
020
100
030
030
010
010
030
030
030
030
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
N
N
N
N
N
M
N
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
N
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
iPC
EPC
LPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
tPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
iPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
tPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
tPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
KPC
EPC
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AH
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
-------
ID TYPE SOURCE
MILES DATE AMPHIBOLE
A-C PIPE COLLECTED MFL
PAGE 13
CHRYSOTILE BLANK MET LAB
MFL MFL
PEF
tn
06-22-79
STATE CITY
CT GREENWICH, HILLCREST
CT GREENWICH. MIANUS
CT GREENWICH, PUTNAM
CT GRISWOLD
CT GRISWOLD
CT GRISWULD
CT GPOTON, S.C.W.A.
CT GROTON, S.C.M.A.
CT GROTON, UTILITY
CT GROTON, UTILITY
CT GROTON, UTILITY
CT GROTON, UTILITY
CT GUILFORD
CT GUILFORD
CT HAMDEN, L. GREEN
CT HAMDEN, M. CARMEL
CT HAMDEN, S. GIANT 12
CT HAMDEN, S, GIANT 13
CT HARTFORD, MDC SEE E HARTFORD
CT KENT
CT KILLINGLY, CRYSTAL §1
CT KILLINGLY, CRYSTAL II
CT KILLINGLY, CRYSTAL 12
CT KILLINGLY, CRYSTAL 12
CT KILLINGLY, WUIIAMSVILLE
CT KILLINGLY, WILLIAMSVILLE
CT LEDYARD, SCWA II S, 12
CT LEDYARD, SCWA «1 & 12
CT LKOYARD, SCWA 13
CT LEDYARD, SCWA-BAP
CT LEDYARD, SCWA-BAR
CT LEOYARD, SCWA-BAR
CT LEDYARD, SCWA-FVH
CT LEDYARD, SCWA-FVH
CT LEDYARD, SCWA-GRAY FARM
CT LEDYARD, SCWA-GRAY FARM
CT LITCHFIELD
CT LITCHFIELD
CT MANCHESTER, SURFACE
CT MANCHESTER, SUPFACF.
CT MANCHESTER, WELL
CT MANCHFSTFR, WELL
CT MANSFIELD, HARDWOOD
CT MANSFIELD, HARDWOOD
CT MANSFIELD, U. OF CONN.
CT MANSFIFI.D, U. OF CONN.
CT MARLBOROUGH
(TYPE) FaFlNlSHED AT SOURCE D«DISTRlBUTlON R«RAW EaPLANT DISCHARGE EFFLUENT
(SOURCE) S«SURFACE, WcWELL, C'CISTERN, B'COMBIMED
(B/N) B»BELOW DETECTION LIMIT N«NOT STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT
(METHODi) M«MILLIPORE COND. WASH., N«NUCLEPOPE JAFFE, D»DROP, L=MILLIPORE JAFFE-WICK, BSDOUBLE NUCLEPORE FILTER
(LAB) EPC«CPA, CINCINNATI EPDsEPA, DULUTH EPGcEPA, ATHENS, GA MCCsMCCRONE ASSOCIATES, UIL*UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS, DOWa
DOW CHEMICAL, MIDLAND, MI,, UCB«U. UF CALIF., BERKELEY, WIS*wtSC. DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES, UWA=U. WASH., SEATTLE, MSSs MT.
SINAI H05P., NEW YORK, NMIsNEW MEXICO INST. OF MINING, CMC=CITY OF CHICAGO WATER PURIFICATION LABORATORY, MDH*MINN, DEPT, OF HEALT
UMD»UNIV. OF MINN., DULUTH
36516
36515
36514
36434
36433
36433
36442
36443
36490
36492
36491
36493
37608
37609
37529
37528
37526
37527
36579
37649
36420
36421
36422
36423
36419
36419
36438
36439
36437
36448
36448
36449
36440
36441
36450
36451
37630
37631
36411
37542
36413
36414
36481
36482
36479
36480
36409
D
F
F
D
D
D
F
D
F
D
D
D
F
D
F
F
F
F
F
F
D
F
D
F
D
F
D
F
F
F
D
F
D
F
D
F
D
F
D
D
F
F
D
D
F
F
S
S
W
5
W
S
W
W
w
S
w
N
W
W
w
w
w
w
w
w
S
w
w
w
w
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.00
3.00
0.00
0.30
0.00
5.00
3.30
5.00
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
o.oo
0.00
0.00
0.30
0.00
0.30
0.00
0.30
0.00
0.20
o.oo
0,00
o.no
0.20
0.00
0.30
0,00
0.70
0.00
1 .00
0.00
0.20
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.20
3.00
0.00
0.00
02/22/77
02/22/77
02/22/77
12/20/76
12/20/76
12/20/76
12/28/76
12/28/76
02/03/77
02/03/77
02/03/77
02/03/77
07/06/77
07/06/77
04/06/77
04/06/77
04/06/77
04/06/77
07/29/77
12/14/76
12/14/76
12/14/76
12/14/76
12/14/76
12/14/76
12/28/76
12/28/76
12/18/76
01/03/77
01/03/77
01/03/77
12/28/76
12/28/76
01/03/77
01/03/77
07/20/77
07/20/77
12/10/76
04/02/77
12/10/76
12/10/76
01/27/77
01/27/77
01/27/77
01/27/77
12/09/76
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
N
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
N
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
R
B
0.200
0.060
0.100
0.020
0.020
0.030
0.020
0.100
U.200
0.100
0.200
0,030
0,010
0,010
0.020
0.030
0.010
0.010
0.100
0.030
0,030
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.060
0.010
0.010
0.020
0.020
0.070
0.030
0,050
0.030
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.100
0.100
0.010
0.010
0,010
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.100
B
B
B
N
N
B
N
B
B
N
N
N
N
B
B
8
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
N
B
N
B
N
B
N
B
N
B
B
B
B
N
N
N
N
R
0.200 B
0.060 B
0.100 B
0.100 B
0.200 B
0.200 B
0.020 B
0.400 B
1.200 B
0.100 B
0,200 B
0.2TO B
0.050 B
0.050 N
1.000 N
0,030 N
0.010 N
0.010 N
0,100 B
0.030 N
0.030 N
0.010 N
0.010 N
0,010 N
0.010 N
0.300 B
o.oio a
0.060 B
0.300 N
0.300 N
0.090 N
O.OJO B
0.200 B
0.030 N
0.060 N
0.010 B
0.050 B
0.100 B
o.ioo a
0.010 B
0.010 B
0.050
0.050
0.050
0.050
0.100 B
0,200
0.060
0,020
0.020
0.020
0.030
0.020
0.020
0.200
0.100
0.100
0.200
0.200
0.010
0.010
0.020
0.0)0
0.010
0.100
0.060
0.060
0.020
0.020
0.020
0.020
0.060
0.010
0.010
0.040
0.040
0.030
0.030
0.050
0.060
0.020
0.010
0.010
0.010
0,010
0.010
0.010
0.100
M
M
M
M
M
N
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
N
N
N
N
N
M
M
M
M
M
M
H
M
M
N
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
N
N
M
M
N
tPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
tPC
EPC
E.FC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
-------
tn
06-22-79
STATE CITY
CT MARLBOPOUGH
CT MERIDAN
CT WEPIDAN
CT MIDDLEBURY, WESTOVFR
CT MIDDLETOWN
CT MIDDLETOWN
CT MILFORD, SEE BRANFORD
CT MONROE
CT MONROE
CT MONTVILLE. DEER PON
CT MONTVILLE, G.J.W.C.
CT MONTVILLE, G.J.W.C.
CT MONTVILLE, G.J.W.C.
CT MONTVILLF, OAKDALE HTS
CT MONTVILLE, OAKDALE HTS
CT MONTVILLE, OAKDALE HTS
CT MONTVILLC, SCWA
CT MONTVILLE. SCWA
CT MORRIS, WATERBURY W.C.
CT NAUGATUCK. CONN. M. C.
CT NAUGATUCK. CONN, W, C.
CT NAUGATUCK, CONN, W. C.
CT NAUGATUCK. INDIAN HILL
CT NAUGATUCK, INDIAN HILL
CT NEW BRITIAN
CT NEW BRII1AN
CT NEW CANAAN
CT NEW CANAAN
CT NEW FAIPriELD, BALL POND
CT NEW FAIRFIELD, FIELDSTONE P
CT NEW FAIRFIELD, FIELDSTONE p
CT NEW FAIRFIELD, OAKHOOD
CT NEW FA1PFIELO, OAKWOOD
CT NEW FAIRFIELD, POSSUM P.
CT NEW FAIRFIELD. POSSUM P.
CT NEW HARTFOBD
CT NEW HARTFORD
CT NEW HARTFORD
CT NEW HAVEN
CT NEW HAVEN, L. GALIARD
CT NEW HAVEN, L. HAMONESSIT
CT NEW HAVEN, L, SALTESTALL
CT NEW HAVEN, L. WHITNEY
CT NEW HAVEN, SPILLWAY
CT NEW LONDON, NLWD
CT NEW LONDON, NLWD
CT NEW MILFORD, BIRCH
(TYPE) F«FINISHED AT SOURCE D'DISTPIBUTION R»RAW E»PLANT DISCHARGE EFFLUENT
(SOURCE) S«SURFACE, W»WELL, C»CISTERN, B«COM8INED
(B/N) B«BELOW DETECTION LtMIT N«NOT STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT
(METHODl) MsMILLIPORE COND. WASH., NsNUcLEPOKE JAFFE, D=DROP, LeMILLIPORt, JAKFE-WICK, RsDOUBLE NUCLEPORE FILTER
(LABJ EPC«EPA, CINCINNATI FPOsEPA, DULUTH EPG=EPA, ATHENS, GA MCCsMCCRONE ASSOCIATES, UIL = UN tVERSlTY OF ILLINOIS, D0fc =
DOW CHEMICAL, MIDLAND, MI., UC8=U. OF CALIF,, BERKELEY, WIs = WlSC, DE.PT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES, UWA=U. WASH., SEATTLE, MSS= MT.
SINAI HOSP., NEW YORK, NMIxNFW MEXICO INST. Of V1NJNG, Cwr=ClTY OF CHICAGO WATER PURIFICATION LABORATORY, MDHsMINN. DEPT. Of HEALT
UMD»UNIV, OF MINN., DULUTH
ID
36410
37544
37543
37635
36406
36405
36549
37581
37582
36470
36471
36471
36472
36461
36463
36462
36453
36452
37633
36566
36568
36567
36455
36454
37519
37654
37508
37507
36456
36517
36538
36539
36540
36541
36542
37557
37558
37557
24096
36549
37530
36548
36547
36550
37516
37515
37639
IYPE
D
F
F
F
D
F
F
D
F
D
D
F
F
D
F
D
F
r
D
D
D
D
F
f
r
D
f
r
F
D
F
D
F
D
D
F
D
F
F
F
F
F
D
F
F
SOURCE
W
S
S
W
W
S
W
W
W
W
S
W
S
S
S
H
W
W
W
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
W
MILF.S
A-C PIPE
0.10
0.00
0.00
0,00
0.25
0.00
0.00
0,50
1
1.00
1 .00
0,00
0.00
0.30
0.00
0.70
0.00
0.00
0.80
0.80
0.50
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.20
0.00
0,20
0.00
0.50
0.10
0.00
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
o.oo
0.00
0.20
0.00
0.00
DATF.
COLLECTED
12/09/76
05/02/77
05/05/77
07/22/77
12/09/76
12/09/76
05/17/77
05/17/77
01/20/77
01/20/77
01/20/77
01/20/77
01/19/77
01/19/77
01/19/77
01/03/77
01/03/77
07/22/77
03/09/77
03/09/77
03/09/77
01/04/77
01/04/77
04/05/77
09/08/77
03/30/77
03/30/77
01/06/77
02/24/77
02/24/77
02/24/77
02/24/77
02/24/77
02/24/77
05/11/77
05/11/77
05/11/77
09/19/74
02/28/77
04/11/77
02/28/77
02/28/77
02/28/77
03/31/77
03/31/77
07/26/77
AMPHIHOLE
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
N
8
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
MFL
0.100
0.010
0,010
0.100
0.050
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.020
0.030
0.050
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.010
0,200
0.010
0,020
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.100
0,100
0.100
0.100
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.010
o.oto
0.050
0.100
0.050
0.070
0.020
0.020
0.010
0.200
0.050
0,010
0.100
0.020
CHRYSOTILE
B
N
B
B
B
N
B
N
B
B
N
B
N
N
B
B
B
B
B
B
N
N
B
B
B
B
N
B
B
B
B
N
N
B
N
B
B
B
N
N
B
MFL
0.100
0.050
0,010
1.400
0,050
0,010
0.050
0.050
0.020
0.200
0.200
0,010
0.010
0.050
0.010
0.070
0.070
0.200
0.010
0.020
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.200
0.500
0,500
0.500
0.1(0
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.050
0.010
0,010
0,050
0. 100
0,300
0.400
0.020
0, 100
0.010
0.200
0.050
0,060
0,500
0.020
B
N
N
B
B
B
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
B
B
B
B
B
N
B
N
N
N
N
N
N
B
B
N
BLANK MET
MFL
0.100
0.020
0.020
0.100
0.050
0.010
0.010
o.oio
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.200
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.200
0.200
0.020
0.010
0.200
0.050
0.010
0,010
0,040
N
M
N
M
N
N
M
M
M
N
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
H
M
M
M
H
M
M
M
M
M
M
N
N
M
N
N
H
M
N
LAB
EPC
EPC
EPC
tPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
tPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
PL!
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AA
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
-------
ID 1YPE SOURCE
W
W
tn
06-22-79
STATE CITY
CT NEW MILFOPD, CAMEbOT
CT NEW MILFORD, CAMELOT
CT NEW MILFORD, CANDLEWOOD
CT NEW MILFORD, CANDLEWOOD
CT NEW MILFORD, DEAN HT5
CT NEW MILFORD, DEAN HTS
CT NEM MILFORD, LONE OAK
CT NEW MILFORD, LONE OAK
CT NEW MILFORD, SUNNY VALLEY
CT NEW MILFORD, SUNNY VALLEY
CT NEWINGTON, HOC
CT NEHTOWN, CHESTNUT HILL »1
CT NEWTOWN, CHESTNUT HILL 13
CT NEWTOWN, CHESTNUT HILL 13
CT NEWTOWN, NWC
CT NEWTOWN, NWC
CT NORFOLK
CT NORFOLK
CT NORTH PRANFORO
CT NORTH BRANFORD
CT NORTH CANAAN
CT NORTH CANAAN
CT NORTH CANAAN
CT NORTH HAVEN, S. GIANT 12
CT NORTH HAVEN, S. GIANT M
CT NORTH STONINGTON
CT NORTH STONINGTON
CT NOPWALKr 1ST DIST.
CT NORWALK, 1ST DIST.
CT NORWALK, 1ST DIST.
CT NOPWALK, 2ND DIST.
CT NORWICH, HOSP.
CT NORWICH, HOSP.
CT NORWICH, NWD
CT NORWICH, NWD
CT NORWICH, OAKLAND HTS
CT NORWICH, OAKLAND HTS
CT NORWICH, TRASK
CT OLD LYME, CHADWICH
CT OLD LYME, CHADWICH
CT OLD SAYBPOOK
CT ORANGE, wINTERGREF.N
CT PLAINFIELD, ALDRICH HTS
CT PLAINFIELD, HILLDALE
CT PLAINFIELD, HILLDALE
CT PLAINFIELD, PWC
CT PLAINFIELD, PWC
(TYPE) FBFINISHED AT SOURCE D«DTSTRIBIJTJON R = RA* EspLANT DISCHARGE EFFLUENT
(SOURCE) S«SUPFACE, W»WELL, C»CISTERN, B»COMfllN£D
(B/N) B«BELOW DETECTION LIMIT N»NOT STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT
(MF.THOon M»MILLIPORE COND. WASH., N.NUCLEPOHK JAFFE, DSDPOP, L»MILLIPORF JAFFE-WICK, B*DOUBLE NUCLEPORE FILTER
(LAB) EPC«EPA, CINCINNATI EPD.EPA, DULUTH EPG«EPA. ATHENS, GA MCCsMCCRONE ASSOCIATES, UIL-UNIVEHS1IY OF ILLINOIS, DOWr
DOW CHEMICAL, MIDLAND, MI., DCBiU. OF CALIF., BERKELEY, WIS=WISC. DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES, UWAsU. WASH., SEATTLE, MSS« MT,
SINAI HOSP., NEW YORK, NMIsMEW MEXICO INST, Uf MINING, CMC»CITY OF CHICAGO WATER PURIFICATION LABORATORY, MDH«MINN. DEPT. OF HEALT
UMD»UNIV. OF MINN., DULUTH
37624
37625
36475
36476
37548
37549
36477
36478
37622
37623
36579
37545
37546
37547
37509
37510
37643
37644
37614
37615
37641
37642
37652
37526
37527
36447
36446
36522
36521
36523
36524
36511
36510
36509
36508
36513
36512
36546
36504
36505
36497
37529
36417
36578
36577
36425
36424
F
D
F
D
F
D
D
F
F
D
F
F
F
D
F
D
D
F
D
F
F
D
D
F
F
D
F
F
F
D
F
D
F
D
F
D
F
D
F
D
D
F
F
F
D
F
D
MILES
•C PIPE
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.40
0.00
0.10
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.50
0.00
1.00
0.10
0.00
0.20
O.OG
0.00
0.40
0.50
0.00
0.00
1.70
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.20
0.00
0.30
0.00
1.75
0.00
0.30
0.00
0.00
0.60
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
12.00
o.oo
0.03
DATE
COLLECTED
07/18/77
07/18/77
01/24/77
01/24/77
05/04/77
05/04/77
01/24/77
01/24/77
07/18/77
07/18/77
03/15/77
05/04/77
05/04/77
05/04/77
03/30/77
03/30/77
07/27/77
07/27/77
07/12/77
07/12/77
07/27/77
07/27/77
08/09/77
04/06/77
04/06/77
12/28/76
12/28/76
02/23/77
02/23/77
02/23/77
02/23/77
02/16/77
02/16/77
02/16/77
02/16/77
02/16/77
02/16/77
02/28/77
02/23/77
02/23/77
02/08/77
04/06/77
12/14/76
03/10/77
03/10/77
12/14/76
12/14/76
AMPHIBOLE
B
N
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
P
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
N
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
N
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
MFL
0,010
0.100
0.010
0,010
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.010
0,010
0.010
0.010
0,010
0.010
0.010
0.300
0.200
0.050
0.050
0.010
0.010
0.090
0.200
0.030
0.010
0,010
0.010
0.010
0.060
0.010
0.010
0.100
0.010
0.010
0.050
0.100
0,010
0.010
o.oio
0,020
0.060
0,040
0.060
0.010
0.030
0.010
0.010
0.010
CHRYSOTILE
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
N
N
B
N
B
B
B
B
N
B
B
N
B
B
N
N
N
N
B
N
N
B
B
B
N
N
B
B
B
N
N
N
MFL
0.010
0.900
0.010
0.090
0.010
0,010
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.010
1 .400
0.050
0.050
0.300
1.200
0.050
0.400
0.010
0.010
0,090
0.900
0.100
0.010
0.010
0.060
0.010
0.060
0.050
0.050
0.500
0.050
0.010
0.200
0.500
0.050
0.010
0.010
0,020
0.300
0.200
0.060
0.010
0.030
0.050
0.050
0.050
N
N
B
B
N
N
N
N
N
N
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
N
N
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
N
B
B
N
B
B
B
B
BLANK MET
MFL
0.030
0.030
0.010
0.010
0,010
0.030
0.030
0.020
0.020
0.020
0.300
0.200
0.050
0.050
0.010
0.010
0.090
0.090
0.030
0.010
0.010
0.060
0.010
0.010
0.100
0,010
0.010
0.010
0.100
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.020
0.060
0.020
0.030
0.010
0,010
0.010
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
N
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
N
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
N
M
N
N
M
M
LAB
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
iPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
REi
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AS
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
-------
(Jl
oo
06-27-79
STATE CITY
CT PLA1NFIELD, TRASK
CT PLH1NVILLE, PWC
CT PLAINVILLE, PWC
CT PLYMOUTH, CWC
CT PLYMOUTH, CWC
CT PORTLAND, PWM
CT PORTLAND, PWW
CT PROSPECT, P. LAKK
CT PUTNAM
CT RIDGEFIELD, R. KNOLLS
CT RIDGEFIELD, R. KNO!,LS
CT PIDGEFIELD, R.W.S.C.
CT PIDGEFIELD, R.W.S.C.
CT RIDGEFIELD, 8CODON-HEMLOCK
CT RIDGEFIELD, SCODON-HEHLOCK
CT ROCKY HILL, MDC SEE E HARTFD
CT SALISBURY, LAKEVILLE
CT SALISBURY, LAKEVILLE
CT SEYMOUR, SWC
CT SEYMOUR, SWC
CT SHARON
CT SHARON, SSWA
CT SHELTON, SEE BIPDGFPORT
CT SIMSBURY, TARRIFFVILLE
CT SIMSBUPY, TARRIFFVILLE
CT SIMSBUPY, VILLAGE W.C.
CT SIMSBURY, VILLAGE W.C. It
CT SIMSBURY, VILLAGE W.C. 13
CT SOMERS, CWC
CT SOMEPS, CWC
CT SOMERS, LABUTIS
CT SOMERS, LABUTIS
CT SOUTH WINDSOR, AVERY HTS
CT SOUTH WINDSOR, AVERY HTS
CT SOUTH WINDSOR, BURHAM AC
CT SOUTH WINDSOR, BURHAM AC
CT SOUTH WINDSOR, POCKVILLE
CT SOUTH81IRY, HERITAGE VILL.
CT SOUTHBUR.Y, HERITAGE VILL,
CT SOUTHBURY, S. TRAINING SC.
CT SOUTHBURY, S. TRAINING SC.
CT SOUTHINGTON, SWD 12
CT SOUTHINGTON, SWD t2
CT SOUTHINGTON, SWD »4
CT SOUTHINGTON, SWD M
CT SPRAGUE, BALTIC RES.
CT STAFFORD, CWC «2
ID TYPE SOURCE
36545
37621
37620
36570
36571
36407
36408
37524
36576
37505
37506
36527
36528
36457
36458
36579
37646
37645
37606
37605
37648
37647
37535
37536
37539
37538
37537
37572
37571
37599
37598
37595
37594
37597
37596
37564
36502
36503
36500
36501
37626
37627
37628
37629
36432
37561
F
D
F
F
D
F
D
F
F
F
D
D
F
F
D
D
F
D
F
D
F
D
r
D
F
F
F
D
D
F
D
F
D
F
D
D
F
F
D
F
D
F
D
F
D
1ILES DATE AMPHIBOLE
: PIPE
0.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.30
0.00
3.00
0.00
0.00
0,00
0,40
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.20
0.80
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.60
0.00
0.50
0.00
1.80
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.70
0.50
0.00
0.30
0,00
0.10
0.00
0.40
2.00
0.00
0.00
1.20
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.30
0.00
3.10
COLLECTED
B
07/13/77 B
07/31/77 B
03/09/77 B
03/09/77 B
12/09/76 B
12/09/76 B
04/06/77 B
03/10/77 B
03/29/77 B
03/29/77 B
02/23/77 B
02/23/77 B
01/12/77 N
01/12/77 B
07/27/77 B
07/27/77 B
06/13/77 B
06/13/77 B
07/29/77 B
07/29/77 B
04/12/77 B
04/12/77 B
04/12/77 B
04/12/77 B
04/12/77 B
05/13/77 B
05/13/77 B
06/02/77 B
06/02/77 B
05/26/77 B
05/26/77 B
05/26/77 B
05/26/77 B
05/13/77 B
02/08/77 B
02/08/77 B
02/08/77 B
02/08/77 B
07/20/77 B
07/20/77 B
07/20/77 B
07/20/77 B
12/20/76 B
05/13/77 B
MFL
0.010
0.020
0,050
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.040
0.030
0.020
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.100
0.020
0.100
0.200
0.050
0.100
0.050
0.500
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.020
0.020
0,010
0.010
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.030
0,010
0.010
0.020
0.010
0,020
0.500
0.010
0.500
0.100
0.200
CHRYSOTILE
B
B
B
B
N
B
N
N
N
B
B
B
B
N
B
B
B
B
N
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
MfL
0.010 N
0.070 B
0.050 B
0.080
0.100
0.010 B
0,200 B
0.300 N
0.020 B
0.050 N
0.050 N
0.050 B
0.010 B
0.020 B
0.100 B
0.100 B
0.200 B
0.200 B
0.100 B
0.050 B
0.500 B
0.100 B
0.010 B
0.050 B
0.010 B
0.010 B
0.020 B
0.020 B
0.010 B
0.010 B
0.030 B
0.030 B
0.030 B
0,030 B
0.030 B
0.010
0.010
0.020
0.010
0,020 B
0,500 B
0,010 B
0.500 B
1.800 B
0.200 N
BLANK MET LAB RE
MFL
0,010
0,020
0.050
0.010
0.040
0.030
0,020
0.020
0.020
0.010
0.010
0.020
0.020
0.100
0.200
0.050
0.100
0.050
0.500
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.020
0.020
0.010
0.010
0.030
0,030
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.020
0.500
0.010
0.500
0.100
0,200
M EPC
M EPC
H EPC
M EPC
M EPC
M EPC
N EPC
H EPC
M EPC
M EPC
H EPC
M EPC
M EPC
M EPC
M EPC
M EPC
M EPC
H EPC
M EPC
M EPC
N EPC
N EPC
M EPC
N EPC
N EPC
N EPC
N EPC
N EPC
M EPC
M EPC
M EPC
M EPC
N EPC
N EPC
N EPC
N EPC
N EPC
M EPC
M EPC
N EPC
N EPC
N tPC
N EPC
M EPC
N EPC
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AH
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
(TYPF.) F»FI»ISHCD AT SOURCE DaDISTRIBUIION P«RAW E»PLANT DISCHARGE EFFLUENT
(SOURCE) S«SURF»CE, W«WELL, C«CIRTERN, B«COMBIMED
(B/N) 8«BCM)W DETECTION LIMIT N«NOT STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT
(METHODl) HaMJLLIPORE COND. WAStf., NsNUCLEPOHE JAFFE, D=DROP, LaMILLIPORE JAFFE-WICK, BsDOUBLE NUCLEPOPE FILTER
(LAB) EPC»EPA, CINCINNATI EPOmEPA, DULUTH EPGaEPA, »THENS, GA MCCsMCCRONE ASSOCIATES, UIL=UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS, DOWs
DOW CHEMICAL, MIDLAND, MI., UCB«U, OF CALIF., BEPKELEY, WISsWISC, DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES, UWAaU. WASH., SEATTLE, MSS» MT,
SINAI HOSP., NlfW YORK, NMI«NEW MEXICO INST, Of MINING, CMC=CITY OF CHICAGO WATER PURIFICATION LABORATORY, MDH»MINN, DEPT. OF HEALT
UMDBUNIV. OF MINN., DULUTH
-------
06-22-79
STATE CITY
tn
PAGE 17
ID TYPE SOURCE MILES DATE AMPHIBOLE CHRYSOTILE BLANK MET LAB
A«C PIPE COLLECTED MFL MFL MFL
PEF
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
STAFFORD, CWC 12
STAFFORD, CWC 12
STAMFORD, SMC (PEC)
STAMFORD, SWC (PEC)
STON1NGTON, MYSTIC VALLEY
STONINGTON, MYSTIC VALLEY
STONINGTON, MYSTIC VALLEY
STONINGTON, SECWA
STONINGTON, SECWA
STRATFORD, ASBF.STOS TEXTILE CO
STRATFORD, ASBESTOS TEXTILE CO
STRATFORD, ASBESTOS TEXTILE CO
STRATFORD, ASBESTOS TEXTILE CO
STRATFORD, ASBESTOS TEXTILF CO
STRATFORD, ASBESTOS TEXTILE CO
STRATFORD, BRIDGEPORT HYD,
SUFFIELD, CWC-ND
THOMASTON
THOMASTON
THOMPSON, TWC «1
THOMPSON, TWC 11
THOMPSON, TWC »3
TOLLAND, BAXTER FARMS
TOLLAND, BAXTER FARMS
TOLLAND, COUNTRY HILLS
TOLLAND. COUNTRY HILLS
TOLLAND, COUNTRY HILLS
TOLLAND, HERITAGE WOOD
TOLLAND, HERITAGE HOOD
TOLLAND, SUGAR HILL
TOLLAND, SUGAR HILL
TOLLAND, SUMMIT
TOLLAND, SUMMIT
TOLLAND, WOODLAND
TOLLAND, WOODLAND
TOPRINGTON, TWC
TORRINGTON, TWC
TRUMBULL, SEE BRIDGEPORT
VERNON, POCKVILLE
VEPNON, ROCKVILLE
VERNON, POCKVILLE
VEPNON, TOLLCOTTVILLE
VERNON, W.C.
VERNON, W.C.
W. HARTFORD
W. HARTFORD
HALLINGFORD
37560
37559
36517
36518
36464
36466
36465
36445
36444
37502
37568
36569
37634
36429
36428
36426
36597
36598
36586
36588
36587
36594
36593
36590
36589
36592
36591
36596
36595
36487
36486
37565
37592
37592
37601
37602
37603
36401
36402
36483
D
F
F
D
F
D
D
D
F
D
D
D
D
D
D
F
D
F
F
D
F
F
F
D
F
D
F
D
F
D
F
D
F
D
F
D
F
D
D
D
D
F
D
F
D
F
S
s
S
W
s
s
W
W
W
W
N
W
W
M
W
S
W
s
w
2.80
0.00
0.00
0.10
0.00
0.10
0.10
0.20
0.00
0.00
2.60
0.00
0.00
0.50
0,00
0.00
0.00
0.10
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0,00
0.20
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.40
0.00
2.50
0.00
3.70
0.50
0.50
0.30
0.00
0.80
0.00
0.25
0.00
05/13/77
05/13/77
02/22/77
02/22/77
01/19/77
01/19/77
01/19/77
12/28/76
12/28/76
08/06/75
08/06/75
08/07/75
08/08/75
10/20/75
10/21/75
03/29/77
05/13/77
03/09/77
07/22/77
12/14/76
12/14/76
12/14/76
03/21/77
03/21/77
03/17/77
03/17/77
03/17/77
03/21/77
03/21/77
03/21/77
03/21/77
03/21/77
03/21/77
03/21/77
03/21/77
01/31/77
01/31/77
05/13/77
05/25/77
05/25/77
06/06/77
06/07/77
06/07/77
12/OB/76
12/08/76
01/28/77
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
0.500
0.200
0.050
0.050
0,200
0.200
0.050
0.020
0.050
0.300
0.300
0.400
0.400
0.200
0.020
0.030
0.010
0.100
0.010
0.010
0.200
0.010
0,010
0.020
0.010
0.020
0.300
0.100
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.100
0.040
0.040
0,050
0.050
0.010
0.010
0.030
0,020
0,010
0.010
0.010
0.040
o.oio
B
N
B
B
N
N
N
N
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
N
N
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
N
N
B
B
B
B
N
N
0.500
0.800
0.050
0.050
1.000
0.050
0.200
0.100
0.050
0.300
0.300
5.700
0.200
0.400
0.020
0.030
0.010
0.100
0.060
0.060
0.200
0.010
0.010
0.020
0.010
0.020
0.300
0,100
0.010
0.010
0.100
0.100
0.040
0.040
0,050
0.050
0,080
0.090
0.200
0.020
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.200
0.050
N
N
B
B
N
N
N
B
B
N
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
N
N
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
N
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
0.500
0.200
0.050
0.050
0.200
0.200
0.200
0.020
0.050
0.020
0,030
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.010
0,200
0,030
0.030
0,010
0.010
0.300
0.100
0.010
0.010
0.010
0,010
0.100
0.040
0.050
0,050
0.010
0.010
0.030
0.020
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.010
N
N
N
N
M
M
M
M
N
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
N
N
N
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
N
N
N
N
N
N
M
M
M
M
M
M
N
M
N
N
N
N
M
EPC
tec
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
MCC
MCC
MCC
MCC
•KCC
MCC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
E.PC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
6.PC
EPC
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AD
AD
AD
AD
AD
AD
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
(TYPE) MFINISHED AT SOURCE D»OTSTRIBUTTON RsRAW EsPLANT DISCHARGE EFFLUENT
(SOUPCEJ S«SURFACE, WsWELL, C«CISTERN, 8»COMBlNtD
(B/N) B«BELOW DETECTION LIMIT N«NOT STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT
(METHOD!? »«»IIiLI*OPE COND, WASH., NeNUCLEPOHt JAFFE, D=DPOP, L=MILLIPO«£ JAFFE-WICK, BsDOUBLE NUCLtPORE FILTER
(LAB) EPC«EPA, CINCINNATI EPD*EPA, DULUTH EPGxEPA, ATHENS. GA MCC«MCCRONE ASSOCIATES, UlLaUNIVERS1TY OF ILLINOIS, DOW«
DOW CHEMICAL, MIDLAND, MI., UCBsU. OF CALIF., BERKELEY, WISaWlSC. DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES, UWA»U, HASH., SEATTLE, M5S» MT,
SINAI HOSP., NEW YORK, NMIsNEW MEXICO INST. Of MINING, CMC=CITJ OF CHICAGO WATER PURIFICATION LAPORATOPV, MDH=MINN. DEPT, Of HEALT
UMD=UNIV. OF MINN., DULUTH
-------
06-22
STATE
CT
CI
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
DC
DC
DC
DE
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
-79
CITK
WALLINGFOPD
WASHINGTON, RRYAN MEM
WASHINGTON, BRYAN MEM
WASHINGTON, BRYAN MEM
WASHINGTON, JUDEA
WASHINGTON, JUDEA
WATERBURY, MORRIS RES.
WATEPBURY, WIGWAM RES.
WATEPFORD
WATERTUWN
WEST HAVEN, MALTLY
WESTPROOK
WESTPORT, BRIDGEPORT HyD.
WESTPORT, BRIDGEPORT HYD.
WETHERSFIELD, SEE F HARTFORD
WILMINGTON
WINCHESTFR
WINOHAM, WILLIAMANTIC
WINDHAM, WILLIAMANTIC
WIHSOR LOCKS, CWC-NO
WINSOP LOCKS, CWC-ND
WOODBRIDGE. L. GLENN
WOODBRIDGE, WALTROS
WOODBURY, WWC «l
WOODBUPY, WWC 11
WOODBURY, WWC «1
DALE-CARLIA TRT. PLANT 12
DALE-CARLIA TPT. PLANT 12
WASHINGTON
WILMINGTON
BONITA SPRINGS
CAPE CORAL
FORT LAUDERDALE
FORT "MEYERS, FLA. CITIFS
FOPT MEYERS, FT. MEKERS w
FORT MEYFRS, LEE CO,
FORT MEYFRS, PINE ISL,
LAKELAND, COMBEE
LAKELAND, L. MIRIAM DR.
LAKELAND, L. MIRIAM DP.
LAKELAND, L. MIPIAM DR.
HR
HR
CO.
.!>.
ID
1YPE SOURCE MILES DATE AMPHIBOLE
A-C PIPE COLLECTED MFL
PAGE 18
CHRYSOTILE BLANK MET LAB
MFL MFL
PEF
36484
37585
37586
37585
37584
37583
37633
37634
37604
37632
37604
36496
37588
37587
37600
36485
36435
36436
37569
37570
37521
37522
37636
37638
37637
D
D
f
D
F
D
F
F
F
F
F
D
D
r
D
F
F
D
F
D
F
F
D
F
D
S
S
w
w
w
S
S
8
5
H
1.30
1.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.30
0.40
0.00
7
0.00
0.00
0.30
0.50
0,50
0.00
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
01/28/77
05/19/77
05/19/77
05/19/77
05/19/77
05/19/77
07/20/77
07/20/77
06/09/77
07/20/77
04/06/77
01/28/77
05/24/77
05/24/77
06/02/77
01/31/77
12/22/76
12/22/76
05/13/77
05/13/77
04/06/77
04/06/77
07/26/77
07/26/77
07/26/77
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
0.010
0,010
0.020
0,030
0.020
0.020
0.200
0,100
0.030
0,100
0.040
0.040
0.010
0.010
0.020
0.050
0.050
0.050
0.010
0,010
0,030
0.010
0.020
0.020
0.020
N
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
N
N
N
B
B
N
B
B
B
B
N
B
N
N
N
B
0.050
0.010
0.020
0.030
0.020
0,020
0.200
0.100
0.030
0.500
0.200
0.200
0.010
0.010
0.100
0.050
0.050
0.050
0.010
0.500
0.030
0.050
0.100
0.060
0.020
B
B
B
N
N
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
N
N
N
N
N
0.010
0.020
O.C30
0.020
0.020
0.030
0,100
0.010
0.010
0,020
0.050
0.010
0.010
0.030
0.010
0.040
0.040
0.040
M
M
M
N
N
N
M
M
N
N
M
N
N
N
M
M
N
N
M
M
M
M
N
N
M
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
tPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
tPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
26376 F
26376 F
17097 D
22904
0.00
0.00
09/22/76 B
09/22/76 B
02/00/75 B
0.020
0.030
0.040
10/36/74 B 0.050
0.300
0.200
N 0.200
0.300
M EPC
N EPC
M EPC
M EPC
AB
AB
AA
AA
37904
37496
13947
37902
37488
37490
37494
39752
39751
39764
39767
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
D
D
D
D
W
w
w
B
S
H
W
W
w
w
0.00
0.00
0.00
0,00
0.00
0.00
0.00
03/23/77
02/23/77
10/03/74
03/22/77
03/16/77
03/16/77
03/21/77
03/09/78
03/09/7B
05/09/78
05/09/78
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
N
N
N
N
0.010
0,010
0.020
0.030
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.200
0.030
0.100
0.300
B
B
N
B
B
N
0.010
0.010
0.070
0.030
0.200
0.010
0.050
0,200
4.900
7.400
2,500
N
N
N
B
B
N
0.010
0.010
0,060
0,010
0,010
0.010
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
N
N
N
N
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
AB
AB
AA
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
(TYPE) r»FINISHED AT SOURCE DsDTSTRIBUTION RaRAW FsPLANT DISCHARGE EFFLUENT
(SOURCE) S»S0RFACE, W«WELL, C*CISTERN, BsCOMBINED
(B/N) MBEbON DETECTION LIMIT N*NOT STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT
(METHODi) ««NILLIPORE COND. WASH,, N*NHCLEPOPE JAFFE, D=DROP, LZMILLIPORE JAFFE-WICK, BSOOUBLE NUCLEPORE FILTER
(LAB) EPC»EPA, CINCINNATI F.PDsEPA, DULUTH tPG = EPA, ATHENS, GA MCC = MCCHONE ASSOCIATES, UILaUNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS, DOW«
DOW CHEMICAL, MIDLAND, MI., UC8«U. OF CALIF., BERKELEY, WISsWISC, DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES, UWA«U. WASH., SEATTLE, MS5* MT,
SINAI HOSP., NFW YORK, NMIaNEW MEXICO INST. Of MINING, C"C=CITY OF CHICAGO WATER PURIFICATION LABORATORY, MDHsMINN. DEPT. OF HEALT
OF MINN., DULUTH
-------
06-22-79
STATF. CITY
ID TYPE SOURCE
MILES DATE AMPHIBOLE
-C PIPE COLLECTED MFL
PAGE 19
CHRYSOHLE BLANK MET LAB
HFL MFL
REF
FL
FL
PL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
LAKELAND, LAKELAND HTS
LAKELAND, LUCE
LAKELAND, PARLE
LAKELAND, PHILLIPS
LAKELAND, PIPHIN
LAKFLAND, SP540
LAKELAND, SPS40
LAKELAND, WELL 37
LEHIGH ACRFS
MELBOURNE
MIAMI
PENSACOLA
PENSACOLA. BLOUNT
PFNSACOLA, CHANTILLY, NC
PENSACOLA, CHANTILLY, NC
PENSACOLA, CHANTILLY, NC
PENSACOLA, CHANTILLY, NC
PFNSACOLA, CHANTILLY, NC
PENSACOLA, CHANTILLY, NC
PENSACOLA, CHANTILLY, NC
PENSACOLA, CHANTILLY, NC
PENSACOLA, CHANTILLY, NC
PENSACOLA, COULTER
PRNSACOLA, DORSAY
PENSACOLA. E. LAKEVIEW
PENSACOLA, E. OLIVE
PENSACOLA, E. SHOhF
PiNSACOLA, E. SHORE
PENSACOLA, E. SHORE
PENSACOLA, E, SHORE
PENSACOLA, E. SHORE
PENSACOLA, E. SHORE
PENSACOLA, E. SHORE
PENSACOLA, E. SHORE
PENSACOLA, LAKEWOOD
PENSACOLA, LILLIAN HY
PFNSACOLA, LONGLEAF
PENSACOLA. LONGLEAF
PENSACOLA, MONTCLAIR
PFNSACOLA, MONTCLAIR
PENSACOLA, MONTCLAIR
PENSACOLA, MONTCLAIR
PENSACOLA, MONTCLAIR
PENSACOLA, MONTCLAIR
PENSACOLA, MONTCLAIR
PENSACOLA, N, PICKENS
PENSACOLA, N.M. SUNSET
39763
39766
39747
39768
39748
39750
39765
39749
37906
21621
31157
39754
39716
26109
32908
39723
39753
39727
39721
39717
39726
26111
32910
39724
397)0
35454
40615
35457
26110
32909
39718
39729
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
F
F
F
r
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
0
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
D
D
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
M
w
w
w
w
N
W
W
w
w
w
w
w
w
M
N
W
w
w
N
M
H
H
W
M
W
W
M
H
W
M
H
W
W
W
W
W
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
2.
2.
2.
2.
2.
2.
2.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
00
00
00
00
30
30
30
30
30
30
30-
30
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
05/09/78
05/09/78
03/09/78
05/09/78
03/09/78
03/09/78
05/09/78
03/09/78
03/23/77
12/23/74
01/20/75
01/29/79
12/07/77
01/17/75
02/21/75
03/26/75
05/09/75
07/07/75
09/05/75
12/04/75
12/08/77
01/29/79
12/08/77
12/07/77
12/07/77
12/08/77
01/17/75
02/21/75
03/26/75
05/09/75
07/07/75
09/05/75
12/04/75
12/08/77
12/08/77
08/10/76
04/14/76
08/10/76
01/17/75
02/21/75
03/26/75
05/09/75
07/07/75
09/05/75
12/04/75
12/07/77
12/08/77
N
N
B
N
B
N
B
B
B
B
B
N
B
N
N
B
N
N
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
N
N
N
N
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
P
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
,100
,300
,030
.600
.030
.100
.020
,500
.050
.020
.040
.050
.030
.070
.300
.060
.050
.120
.030
.050
.050
.030
.200
.020
.010
,200
.200
.100
.100
.000
.010
.010
.050
.020
N
N
B
N
N
B
N
N
N
N
N
B
B
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
B
B
N
5.
16.
0.
5.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
32.
1.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
o.
0.
0,
3.
10.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
000
700
200
600
200
200
200
500
250 N
070
040
700 N
200
700
700
740
230
700
200
420
200
740 N
200
200
200
200
200
400
300
700
100
200
200
400
200
700
200
060
060
050
100
0.010
0.020
0.020
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
M
M
M
N
N
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
N
N
N
N
N
N
M
M
M
H
M
M
M
N
N
M
M
M
M
M
H
M
M
M
M
N
N
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
tPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AA
AA
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
(TYPE) F*ftmSHED AT SOURCE D*D!STRIBUTION RzRAW E*PLANT DISCHARGE EFFLUENT
(SOURCE) S«Sl)RFACE, WsWELL, C*CISTERN, B=COMBINED
(B/N) B*BEU3M DETECTION LIMIT NaNOT STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT
(METHODl) M«»ULLIPOBE COND, WASH., N=NUCLEPOHt JAFFE, DoDROP, LaMILUPORE JAFFE-WICK, BsDOUBLE NUCLEPORE FILTER
(LAB) EPC«EPA, CINCINNATI EPDsEPA. DULUTH EPGattPA, ATHENS, GA MCC*MCCRONE ASSOCIATES, UIL»UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS, DOW"
DOW CHEMICAL, MIDLAND, MI., UCR*U. OF CALIF., BERKFLEY, WIS=WISC. DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES, UWA»U, WASH., SEATTLE, MSS» MT.
SINAI HOSP., NF.W YORK, NMIaNEW MEXICO INST. Ot MINING, CMC=CITY OF CHICAGO HATEP PURIFICATION LABOHATORX, MDH»MINN, DEPI, OF HEALT
UMOsUNIV. OF MINN., DULIITH
-------
06-22
5TATF
FL
FL
Ft
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
IA
IA
ID
ID
ID
ID
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
-79
CITY
PENSACOLA. OLIVE RD.
PENSACOLA, OLIVE RD.
PENSACOLA, PEN'. BLVD.
PENSACOLA, PF.N. BLVD.
PENSACOLA, POINCIANA
PENSACOLA, S. MADISON
PENSACOLA, S.K.
PENSACOLA, «. GONZALEZ
PENSACOLA, WOODLAND
SANIBEL ISLAND
ATLANTA
ATLANTA
ATLANTA
ATLANTA
ATLANTA
ATLANTA
ATLANTA
ATLANTA
ATLANTA, 12 HP
AUGUSTA, CITY
AUGUSTA, RICHMOND CO.
SAVANNAH
SAVANNAH
SAVANNAH, HELL 13
SKIDAWAY ISLAND
SKIDAWAY ISLAND
SKIDAWAY ISLAND
CORRALVILLE
IOWA CITY
CALDWELL 5 WELLS
CALDwCLL, WELL 7
NAMPA WELL H
NAMPA, WELLS 1,2
CAIRO
CHAMPAIGN, EAST
CHAMPAIGN, WEST
CHICAGO
CHICAGO
CHICAGO, BANNOCKRUPN
ID IYPE
40616
354SS
40617
35456
19728
39722
39719
39720
39725
37492
21658
37480
37486
21627
16145
16144
16143
37366
37364
37877 F
37878 r
37872 F
37871 F
12776
37349 F
37350 F
R
F
F
SOURCE MILES DATE AMPHIBOLE
A-C PIPE COLLECTED MFL
PAGE 20
CHRYSOTILE BLANK MET LAB
MFL MFL
PEF
S
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.00
.00
.00
?
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
,00
.00
.00
.00
.00
04/14/76
08/10/76
04/14/76
08/10/76
12/08/77
12/07/77
12/07/77
12/07/77
12/08/77
03/26/77
04/03/75
04/03/75
04/03/75
11/28/75
11/28/75
03/00/76
03/00/76
08/00/76
10/13/76
03/09/77
11/07/77
04/29/75
11/15/76
11/15/76
11/15/76
12/07/77
12/07/77
01/24/77
01/24/77
01/21/77
01/22/77
07/00/74
11/17/76
11/17/76
03/27/75
03/27/75
02/17/75
B
B
N
B
B
R
B
N
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.010
.020
.100
.500
.020
,050
.050
.050
.200
.050
.100
.500
.100
.200
.010
.010
.020
.060
.020
.020
.100
.010
.010
,10'0
.030
.050
.010
.020
.020
.020
.250
.200
N
N
N
B
B
N
B
B
B
B
N
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
N
B
M
N
N
N
N
B
B
N
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
12
11
8
0
0
36
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.050
.100
.700
.700
.100
.200
.050
.050
.200
.050 N
.000
.000
.400
.100
.500
,000
,100
.200
.010
.010 B
.300 B
.060
.020
.020
.030
.740
.100
.010 B
.010 B
.500 B
.030
.100 B
.050 B
.070
.100
.100
.250
.200
.200
M
M
M
M
N
N
N
N
N
0.050 M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
N
M
0.010 M
0.020 M
M
M
M
M
M
M
0,010 M
0,010 M
0.100 M
M
0.050 M
0.010 M
M
M
M
M
M
M
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
MCC
MCC
MCC
MCC
MCC
MCC
MCC
EPD
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EFC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
MCC
MCC
UIL
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AS
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AA
AA
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AA
AB
AB
AC
AC
AJ
(TYPE) F*riNJ5HEO AT SOUPCF. D*OISTRIBUTION RsRAVn KiPLANT DISCHARGE EFFLUENT
(SOURCE) S«5URFAC£, WaWELL, C«C15TKRN, 6=COMB1NED
(B/N) B»BELOW DETECTION LIMIT NsNOT STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT
(METHODl) tfttMJLMPOPE COND. WASH,, NsNUCLEPOKE JAFFE, D = UHOP, L=MILLIPOPE JAFFE-WICK, B=DOUBLE NUCLEPORE FILTER
(LAB1) EPC«"EPA, CINCINNATI F.POsFPA, DULUTH EPG = EPA, ATHKNS, f!A MCC = MCCRONE ASSOCIATES, UILsUNIV&RSITY OF ILLINOIS, DOW«
DOW CHEMICAL, MIDLAND, MI., UCB=U. OF CALIF., fURKELfcY, hIS = WISC. DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES, UfcAsU. MSH., SEATTLE, MSS« MI.
SINAI HOSP., NEW YORK, NMIaNEW MEXICO INST, Of MINING, CMC=CITY OF CHICAGO WATER PURIFICATION LABORATORY, MOH«MINN, DEPI. OF HEALT
UMDsllNIV. OF MINN., DULUTH
-------
06-22-79
STATF CITK
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
TL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO.
CHICAGO,
BANNOCKBURN
BLUF ISLAND
BLUE ISLAND
BRADLEY PD.
BRADLEY RP .
BROOKF1F.LD
BROOKFIELD
BROOKFIELD
CITY
CITY
CITY
CITY
CITY
CITY
CITY
CITY
CTTY
CITY
CITY
CITY
CITY
CITY
CITY
CITY
CITY
CITY
CITY
CITY
CITY
CITY
CITY, JAPDINE PLT
CITY, JARDINE PLT
CITY, JARDINE PLT
CITY, JAPDINE PLT
CITY, JAROINE PLT
CITY, JAPDINE PLT
CITY, JAROINE PLT
CITY, JARDINE PLT
CITY, JARDINE PLT
CITY, JAPDINE PLT
CITY, JARDINE PLT
CITY, JARDINE PLT
CITY, JAROINE PLT
CITY, JARDINE PLT
CITY, JARDINE PLT
CITY, JARDINE PLT
CITY, JARDINE PLT
REF
PAGE 21
ID TYPE SOURCE MILES DATE AMPHIBOLE CHRYSOTILE BLANK MET LAB
A-C PIPE COLLECTED HFL MFL MFL
0.200
0.800
0.700
N 0.200
0.400
0.500
N 0.500
N 0.200
0.200
0.080
0.020
0.200
0.300
0.600
0.400
0.400
0.200
0.200 0.400
0.300
0.300
0.070 0,100
0.200
0.300
0.200
0,200
0.200
0.200
0,200
0.200
0,300
1.300
0.300
0.200
2.300
1.700
0.200
0.200
1.700
0.100
1.200
0.500
0,070
0,200
2.000
1.500
0.080
1.100
(TYPE) FaFINISHEO AT SOURCE DxDISTRIBUTION RsRAW ExPLANT DISCHARGE EFFLUENT
(SOURCE) 3«SURFACE, K«W£LL, C=CISTERN, S=COMBINED
(B/N) B'BELOM DETECTION LIMIT NaNOT STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT
(METHODI) M*MILLIPORE COND. WASH., NSNUCLEPOKE JAFFE, DSDRUP, L=MILLIPORE JAFFE-WICK, B«DOUBLE NUCLEPORE FILTER
(LAB) EPC«EPA, CINCINNATI FPDsEPA, DULUTH EPGsEPA, ATHENS, GA MCCsMCCRONE ASSOCIATES, UIL«UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS, D0»«
DOW CHEMICAL, MIDLAND, MI., UCBsU. OF CALIF., BERKELEY, WIS=WISC. DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES, UWA*U. *ASH., SEATTLE, MS5» HI,
SINAI HOSP., Nf-W YORK, NMl>NfM MEXICO INST. 0* MINING, CwCaCITY OF CHICAGO WATER PURIFICATION LABORATORY, MDH»MINN, DEPT. OF
UMD«UNIV. OF MINN., DULUTH
D
F
D
F
D
F
D
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
D
D
F
F
F
F
F
F
r
F
F
R
F
F
F
R
F
F
R
F
R
R
R
F
R
R
F
R
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
8
s
s
s
5
S
S
S
S
s
s
s
s
0.20
0.00
0.60
0.00
0.20
0.00
7.60
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0,00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
?
7
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0,00
02/17/75
01/28/75
01/28/75
02/17/75
02/17/75
04/10/75
04/10/75
06/16/75
07/00/74
08/00/74
09/00/74
10/00/74
11/00/74
12/00/74
01/00/75
02/00/75
03/00/75
03/03/75
03/03/75
03/03/75
03/03/75
04/00/75
05/00/75
06/00/75
07/00/75
08/00/75
09/00/75
10/00/75
H/00/75
12/00/75
01/00/76
01/00/76
02/00/76
02/00/76
03/00/76
03/00/76
04/00/76
04/00/76
05/00/76
05/00/76
06/00/76
06/00/76
07/00/76
07/00/76
08/00/76
08/00/76
09/00/76
M U1L
M U1L
M UIL
M UIL
M UIL
M UIL
M UIL
M UIL
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M EPC
» CMC
M CMC
M EPC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
AJ
AJ
AJ
AJ
AJ
AJ
AJ
AU
AO
AO
AO
AO
AO
AO
AO
AO
AO
AB
AB
AB
AB
AO
AO
AO
AO
AO
AO
AO
AO
AO
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
-------
PAGE 22
ID IYPE SOURCE MILES DATE AMPHIBOLE CHRYSOTILE BLANK MET LAB REF
A-C PIPE COLLECTED MFL MFL MfL
0.200
0.200
2.900
1.800
0.200
0.200
1.700
0.100
1.100
2.300
0.100
0. 100
1.200
1.300
0.090
0.100
1.100
0.900
O.luO
0,200
0.700
0.800
0.100
0.200
0.700
1.000
0.200
0.200
2.900
1.100
0.300
0,109
1.100
1.200
0.200
0.200
1.100
0.900
0.200
0.100
t.OOO
0.700
0.100
0.100
0.900
0,800
0.090
(TYPE) FmFINISHED AT SUURCP DsOlSTRlBUTION RaRAW KsPLANT DISCHARGE EFFLUENT
(SOURCE) S»SURFACE, WaWELL, C'CISTFRN. B*COM8INED
C8/N) BaBELOW DETECTION LIMIT NaNOT STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT
(METHODI) M«MILLIPORE COND. WASH,, NzNUCLEPOHE JAFFE, D^DROP, LrMILLIPORE JAFFE-WICK, BaDOUBLE NUCLEPORE FILTER
(LAB) EPC*EPA, CINCINNATI F.PD = irPA, DULUTH EPG = EPA, ATHENS, GA MCC=MCCRONE ASSOCIATES, UIL = UNIVERS ITY OF ILLINOIS, DOW«
DOW CHEMICAL, MIDLAND, Ml., UCBaU. OF CALIF., BERKf.LFY, V»IS*WISC. DEPT. OF NATURAL, RESOURCES, UWA = U. WASH., SEATTLE, MSS» MI,
SINAI HOSP., NEW YORK, NMI*NEW WF.XICO 1NST. Of MINING, CWC=CITY OF CHICAGO WATF.R PURIFICATION LABORATORY, MDH = MINN. DEPT, OF HEALT
UMD*UNIV, OF MINN., DULUTH
06-22-79
STATF CITY
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
tL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CITY,
CITY,
CITY,
CITY,
CITY,
CITY,
CITY,
CITY,
CITY,
CITY,
CITY,
CITY,
CITY,
CITY,
CITY,
CITY,
CITY,
CITY,
CITY,
CITY,
CITY,
CITY,
CITY,
CITY,
CITY,
CITY,
CITY,
CITY,
CITY,
CITY,
CITY,
CITY,
CITY,
CITY,
CITY,
CITY,
CITY,
CITY,
CITY,
CITY,
CITY,
CITY,
CITY,
CITY,
CITY,
CITY,
CITY,
JARD1NE
JARDINE
JAROINE
JARDINF.
JAHDINE
JARDINE
JARDINE
JARDINE
JARDINE
JARDINE
JARDINE
JAPDtNE
JAKPINE
JAROINE
JARDINE
JAROINE
JAPOINE
JAPDINE
JARDINE
JARDINE
JARDINE
JARDINE
JARDINE
JARDINF
JAPDINE
JARDINE
JARDINE
JARDINE
JARDINE
JARDINE
JARDINE
JARDINE
JARDINE
JARDINE
JARDINE
JARDINE
JARDINE
JAPniNE
JARDINE
JARDINE
JAPDINE
JARDINE
JARDINE
JARDINE
JARDINF.
JARDINE.
JAHDINE
PLT
PLT
PLT
PLT
PLT
PLT
PLT
PLT
PLT
PLT
PLT
PLT
PLT
PIT
PLT
PLT
PLT
PLT
PLT
PLT
PLT
PLT
PLT
PLT
PLT
PLT
PLT
PLT
PLT
PLT
PLT
PLT
PLT
PLT
PLT
PLT
PLT
PLT
PLT
PLT
PLT
PLT
PLT
PLT
PLT
PLT
PLT
F
F
R
R
r
F
R
F
R
R
F
F
P
R
F
F
R
R
F
F
R
R
F
F
R
R
F
F
R
R
F
F
R
R
F
F
R
R
F
f
R
R
F
F
R
R
F
5
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
5
S
S
S
S
S
S
3
S
S
8
S
S
S
S
S
8
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
0,00
0.00
0.00
o.oo
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0,00
0.00
0.00
0,00
0,00
0.00
09/00/76
10/00/76
10/00/76
11/00/76
11/00/76
12/00/76
12/00/76
01/00/77
01/00/77
02/00/77
02/00/77
03/00/77
03/00/77
04/00/77
04/00/77
05/00/77
05/00/77
06/00/77
06/00/77
07/00/77
07/00/77
08/00/77
08/00/77
09/00/77
09/00/77
10/00/77
10/00/77
11/00/77
11/00/77
12/00/77
12/00/77
01/00/70
01/00/78
02/00/78
02/00/78
03/00/78
03/00/78
04/00/78
04/00/78
05/00/78
05/00/78
06/00/78
06/00/78
07/00/78
07/00/78
08/00/78
08/00/78
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
N CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
» CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
H CMC
M CMC
M CMC
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
-------
in
PAGE 23
ID TYPE SOUPCE MILES DATF AMPHI80LE CHRYSOTILE BLANK MET LAB BEF
A-C PIPE COLLECTED MFL MFL MFL
0.100
0.800
1.400
0,200
0.100
1.300
2.300
0.100
0.200
2.200
1.600
0.200
0,200
1.300
1.600
0.200
0,100
1.300
0.700
0.070
0,200
1,200
0,900
0.090
0,200
1,700
1.600
0.200
0.200
3.300
2.700
0.200
1.400
0.100
0.200
1.500
1.200
0.200
0.100
t .000
1.800
0.200
0.100
0.900
1,000
0.200
0.100
(TYPE) F«FINI5HED AT SOURCE DsDISTRIBUTTON RaPAW E=PLANT DISCHARGE EFFLUENT
(SOUPCE) S»SURFACE, WaWELL. C=CISTFRNi B=COHUINED
CB/N) BsBELOW DETECTION LIMIT NaNOT STATISIICALLY SIGNIFICANT
(METHOD!) MsMJLLIPORE COMD, HASH,, NrNUCLfcHOHE JAFFE, D = i)«OP, L=M1LL1PO»F JAFFE-MCK, B*DOUBLE NUCLEPOPE FILTER
(LAB) EPC«EPA, CINCINNATI EPDsEPA, UOLUTH SPGstPA, ATHENS, GA MCC = »CCBONE ASSOCIATES, UILsUN IVEMSITY OF ILLINOIS, DOW«
DOW CHEMICAL, MIDLAND, MI,, UCBsU. OF CALIF., HERKF t,F Y, HJSsWISC. DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES, UWAsU, WASH., SEATTLE, MSS« Ml,
SINAI HOSP., NFW YORK, NMlsNtW MEXICO INST. Lit MINING, CMOCIT* OF CHICAGO WATER PURIFICATION LABORATORY, MDH«MlNN, DEPT, OF HEALT
UMOsUNIV. UF.MINN., OULUTH
06-22-79
STATE CITY
IL CHICAGO,
IL CHICAGO,
IL CHICAGO,
IL CHICAGO.
IL CHICAGO,
IL CHICAGO.
IL CHICAGO,
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO.
CITY,
CITY,
CITY,
CITY,
CITY,
CITY.
CITY,
CITY,
CITY,
CITY,
CITY,
CITY,
CITY,
CITY,
CITY,
CITY,
CITY,
CITY,
CITY,
CITY,
CITY,
CITY,
CITY,
CITY,
CITY,
CITY,
CITY,
CITY,
CITY,
CITY,
CITY,
CITY,
CITY,
CITY,
CITY,
CITY,
CITY,
CITY,
CITY,
CTTY,
CITY,
CITY,
CITY.
CITY,
CITY,
CITY,
CITY,
JARDINC PLT
JARDINE PLT
JARDINE PLT
JARDINE PLT
JARDINE PLT
JARDINE PLT
JARDINE PLT
JARDINE PLT
SOUTH
SOUTH
SOUTH
SOUTH
SOUTH
SOUTH
SOUTH
SOUTH
SOUTH
SOUTH
SOUTH
SOUTH
SOUTH
SOUTH
SOUTH
SOUTH
SOUTH
SOUTH
SOUTH
SOUTH
SOUTH
SOUTH
SOUTH
SOUTH
SOUTH
SOUTH
SOUTH
SOUTH
SOUTH
SOUTH
SOUTH
SOUTH
SOUTH
SOUTH
SOUTH
SOUTH
SOUTH
SOUTH
SOUTH
PLT
Pl,T
PLT
PLT
PLT
PLT
PLT
PI.T
PLT
PLT
PLT
PLT
PLT
PLT
PLT
PLT
PLT
PLT
PLT
PLT
PLT
PLT
PLT
PLT
PLT
PLT
PLT
PIT
PLT
PLT
PLT
PLT
PLT
PIT
PLT
PLT
PLT
PLT
PLT
r
D
R
F
f
R
R
F
F
P
R
r
F
R
R
F
F
R
R
F
F
R
R
F
F
R
R
F
F
R
R
F
R
F
F
R
R
F
F
R
R
F
F
R
R
F
F
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
a
S
S
S
6
S
S
a
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
o.oo
0.00
0,00
0.00
0.00
0,00
0,00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0,00
0.00
0,00
0,00
0.00
0,00
0,00
0,00
0.00
D.OO
0,00
0.00
0,00
0.00
0,00
0.00
0,00
0.00
0,00
0,00
0.00
0,00
0,00
0.00
0,00
o.oo
0.00
0.00
o.oo
0.00
0.00
0,00
0,00
09/00/78
09/00/78
10/00/78
10/00/78
U/00/78
Jl/00/78
12/00/78
12/00/78
01/00/76
01/00/76
02/00/76
02/00/76
03/00/76
03/00/76
04/00/76
04/00/76
OS/00/76
05/00/76
06/00/76
06/00/76
07/00/76
07/00/76
08/00/76
08/00/76
09/00/76
09/00/76
10/00/76
10/00/76
H/00/76
tl/00/76
12/00/76
12/00/76
01/00/77
01/00/77
02/00/77
02/00/77
03/00/77
03/00/77
04/00/77
04/00/77
05/00/77
05/00/77
06/00/77
P6/00/77
07/00/77
07/00/77
H8/00/77
M
M
M
M
H
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
K
M
M
M
H
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
N
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
H
CMC
CMC
CMC
CMC
CMC
CMC
CMC
CMC
CMC
CMC
CMC
CMC
CMC
CMC
CMC
CMC
CMC
CMC
CMC
CMC
CMC
CMC
CMC
CMC
CMC
CMC
CMC
CMC
CMC
CMC
CMC
CMC
CMC
CMC
CMC
CMC
CMC
CMC
CMC
CMC
CMC
CMC
CMC
CMC
CMC
CMC
CMC
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
At
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
-------
06-22
STATE
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
-79
CITY
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO.
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CITY, SOUTH PIT
CITY, SOUTH PLT
CITY, SOUTH PLT
CITY, SOUTH PLT
CITY, SOUTH PLT
CITY, SOUTH PLT
CITY, SOUTH PLT
CITY, SOUTH PLT
CITY, SOUTH PLT
CITY, SOUTH PIT
CITY, SOUTH PLT
CITY, SOUTH PLT
CITY, SOUTH PLT
CITY, SOUTH PLT
CITY, SOUTH PLT
CITY, SOUTH PLT
CITY, SOUTH PLT
CITY, SOUTH PLT
CITY, SOUTH PLT
CITY, SOUTH PLT
CITY, SOUTH PLT
CITY, SOUTH PLT
CITY, SOUTH PLT
CITY, SOUTH PLT
CITY, SOUTH PLT
CTTY, SOUTH PLT
CITY, SOUTH PLT
CITY, SOUTH PLT
CITY, SOUTH PLT
CITY, SOUTH PLT
CITY, SOUTH PLT
CITY, SOUTH PLT
CITY, SOUTH PLT
GLENVIEW
GLGNVIEH
HIGHLAND PARK
HIGHLAND PARK
HIGHLAND PARK
HOFFMAN ESTATES
HOFFMAN ESTATES
HOFFMAN ESTATES
LISLE
LISLE
LISLE
MIDLOTHIAN
MIDLOTHIAN
MIDLOTHIAN
ID IYPE SOURCE MILES DATE AMPHIBOLE
A-C PIPE COLLECTED MFL
PAGE 24
CHRYSOTILE BLANK MET LAB
MFL MFL
PEF
R
R
F
F
R
R
f
F
R
R
R
F
F
R
R
F
F
R
R
F
F
F
R
R
F
F
R
R
F
F
R
R
F
F
D
F
D
F
F
D
F
F
D
F
F
D
F
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
a
8
S
S
S
a
S
W
VI
W
M
M
W
S
S
S
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.30
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.70
0.00
0.00
0.60
0.00
0.00
0.30
0.00
08/00/77
09/00/77
09/00/77
10/00/77
10/00/77
11/00/77
11/00/77
12/00/77
12/00/77
01/00/7H
02/00/78
02/00/78
03/00/78
03/00/78
04/00/78
04/00/78
05/00/78
05/00/78
06/00/78
06/00/78
07/00/78
07/00/78
07/00/78
08/00/78
08/00/78
09/00/78
09/00/78
10/00/78
10/00/78
11/00/78
11/00/78
12/00/78
12/00/78
02/17/75
02/17/75
02/17/75
02/17/75
06/00/75
04/09/75
04/09/75
06/12/75
02/04/75
02/04/75
06/16/75
01/28/75
01/28/75
06/12/75
N
N
N
B
B
B
N
N
N
B
1.200
1.000
0.200
0.200
0,900
1.000
0.200
0.300
1.100
1.700
1.100
0.200
0.200
1.400
1.700
0.100
0.100
1.700
0.800
0.100
0.200
0.200
0.900
1.000
0.100
0.100
1.900
0.800
0.100
0.200
1.700
1.000
0.200
0.200
0.200
0.200
0.200
0.040
0.200
0.030
0.040
0.500
0.500
0.200
0,300
0.300
0.040
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
« CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M CMC
M U1L
M UIL
M UIL
M UIL
M UIL
M UIL
M UIL
M UIL
M UIL
M UIL
M UIL
M UIL
M UIL
M UIL
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
AJ
AJ
AJ
AJ
AU
AJ
AJ
AU
AJ
AJ
AU
AJ
AJ
AU
(TYPE) FaFINISHCD ** SOURCE D»DISTPIBUTION R=MAW EzPLANT DISCHARGE EFFLUENT
(SOURCE) S«SURrACE, W«WELL, fsCISTERN, RaCOMBINED
(B/N) B=BELOW DETECTION LIMIT N=NOT STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT
(METHOD!) M.MILLIPORE COND. WASH., NSNUCLEPOHE. JAFFE, (I=DROP, L=MILLIPORE JAFFE-WICK, B=DOUBLE NUCLEPORE FILTER
(LAB) EPC*EPA, CINCINNATI EPDsFPA. DIJLUTH EPGitPA, ATHENS, GA MCC = MCCRONE ASSOCIATES, UIL = UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS,
DOW CHEMICAL, MIDLAND. HI., UCR=U, Ot CALIf., BERKELEY, XIS.WISC. DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES, U«A«U. WASH., SEATTLE, MSB-
SINAI HOSP., NF.W YORK, NMlaNFW MEXICO FNST. Ot MINING, CMC=CITY OF CHICAGO WATER PURIFICATION LABORATORY, MDH«MINN. DEPT. OF HEALT
UMDsUNIV. OF MINN., D1ILUTH
DOWi
MT.
-------
06-27-79
STATE CITY
ID IYPE SOURCE MILES DATE AMPHIHOLF.
A-C PIPE COLLECTED MFL
PAGF 25
CHRYSOTILE BLANK MET LAB
MFL MFL'
PEF
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
CHICAGO,
KANKAKEE,
RANTOUL
ROLLING MEADOWS
ROLLING MEADOWS
ROLLING MEADUHS
WAUKEGAN
WAUKEGAN
WAUKEGAN
WESTMONT
WESTMONT
WESTMONT
YORK CENTER
YORK CENTER
YORK CENTER
ZION
ZTON
ZION
ZION-BENTON
ZION-BENTON
ASBESTOS TILE CO.
IN ELKHART
IN FT. WAYNE
IN GUSHEN
IN INDIANAPOLIS
IN LAKE MICHIGAN, NORTH-WEST IN,
KS HUTCHINSON, HELL II
KS HUTCHINSON, WELL «2
KS JOHNSON COUNTY
KS JOHNSON COUNTY
KS KANSAS CITY
KS KANSAS CITY
KS KANSAS CITY
KS SOUTH HUTCHINSON
KS TOPEKA
37335
37313
32321
37342
24187
37368
37367
30898
37375
11106
D
F
F
D
D
F
F
D
F
D
f
F
F
D
F
F
D
D
F
F
F
r
r
R
r
F
R
F
R
F
W
w
W
s
s
s
w
w
w
w
w
w
s
s
s
s
s
w
w
s
w
s
w
w
w
0.80
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.20
0.00
0.00
1.90
0.00
0.00
0,00
0.00
0,00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
04/09/75
04/09/75
06/12/75
05/01/75
05/01/75
06/00/75
01/24/75
01/24/75
06/16/75
04/28/75
04/28/75
06/16/76
05/12/75
05/12/75
06/00/75
05/13/75
05/13/75
07/01/75
11/17/76
11/10/77
01/23/79
11/10/77
09/19/74
08/00/76
12/09/76
12/09/76
09/17/75
09/17/75
03/28/75
09/17/75
09/17/75
12/09/76
11/14/74
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
0.900
0.020
0.010
0.020
0.010
0.040
0.630
0.020
0.020
0.500
2.100
0.020
2.100
0.600
0.010
0,020
B
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
N
B
B
N
N
0.030
0. 100
0.200
0.200
0.200
0,300
0.200
0.200
0.400
0.200
0.200
0,200
0.500
0.500
0.200
0.500
0.500
0.300
0.020
0,010
0.020 B
0.010
0,200
0.630
0,020 B
0,020 B
0,500
2.100
0,100
2.100
0.600
0.060 B
0,070
M
M
M
H
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
H
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
0.020 N
M
M
M
0.020 »
0.020 M
M
M
M
M
M
0.010 M
M
U1L
UIL
UIL
UIL
UIL
UIL
UIL
UIL
UIL
UIL
UIL
UIL
UIL
UIL
UIL
UIL
UIL
MCC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
HCC
EPC
EPC
MCC
MCC
EPC
MCC
MCC
EPC
EPC
AJ
AJ
AU
AJ
AJ
AU
AJ
AJ
AU
AJ
AJ
AU
AU
AU
AU
AJ
AJ
AD
AB
AB
AB
AB
AA
AZ
AB
AB
AC
AC
AB
AC
AC
AB
AA
LICKING PLANT
OHIO PLANT
KY ASHLAND
KY COVINGTON
KY COVINGTON
KY DANVILLE
KY DANVILLE
KY DANVILLE
KY DANVILLE
KY DANVILLE ST. HOSPITAL
12973
38149
38146
1618
5422
5421
5420
5423
S
s
s
s
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
08/28/74 B
08/16/77 B
08/16/77 B
12/00/77
12/00/77
12/00/77
12/00/77
12/00/77
0.020 B 0,020
0.050 B 0.050 B
0,050 B 0,050 B
74.000
15.000
12.000
106.000
7,000
M EPC
0.050 M EPC
0.050 M EPC
N EPG
N EPG
N EPG
N EPG
N EPG
AA
AB
AB
AR
AR
AR
AR
AR
(TYPE) FeFINISHEO AT SOURCE D*DISTRIBUTION R*PA* EzPLANT DISCHARGE EFFLUENT
(SOURCE) S»SURFACE, W»WELL, C»CIST€RN, BsCOMBIMED
(B/N) BsBELOW DETECTION LIMIT NsNOT STATIST It ALLY SIGNIFICANT
(METHOD!) MsMlLLIPOPE COND, *>ASH,, NsNUcr.EPOPE JAFFE, D=OROF. L«MILLIPORE JAFFE-WICK, B«DOUB1,E NUCLEPORE FILTER
(LAB) EPC«EPA, CINCINNATI EPDrEPA, DllLl'TH EPGsF.PA, ATHENS, GA MCCsMCCRONE ASSOCIATES, UIL»UM VERSITY OF ILLINOIS, DOW"
DOW CHEMICAL, MIDLAND, MI,, UCBsU. OF CALIF,, BfPKF.LEY, WISsWISC. DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES, UWA«U. WASH., SEATTLE, MSS« MT,
SINAI HOSP., NFW YORK, NMTsNEW MEXICO INST, Ot MINING, C«C=CITY OF CHICAGO WATER PURIFICATION LABORATORY, MDH»MINN. DEPT. OF HEALT
UMD»UNIV. OF MINN.. DULUTH
-------
ON
00
06-22
STATE
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
XY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
MA
HA
MA
MA
MA
MA
MA
MA
MA
MA
MA
MA
MA
MA
MA
MA
MA
MA
MA
-79
CITY
DANVILLE ST. HOSPITAL
FRANKFORT
FRANKFORT
FRANKFORT
HARRODSBURG
HARRODSBURG
HEPRINGTON LAKE
IPVING
KY DAM VILLAGE, A/C
LEXINGTON
LOUISVILLE
LUDLOW, CISTERN
MURRAY
MURRAY
NICHOLASVILLE
NORTH MARSHALL
OHIO RIVER, WESTERN KY.
TAYLORSV1LLE
NEW ORLEANS
NEW ORLEANS, A/C SHEET PLANT
HEW ORLEANS, A/C SHEET PLANT
NEW ORLEANS, A/C SHEET PLANT
NEW ORLEANS, A/C SHEET PLANT
NEW ORLEANS, A/C SHEET PLANT
AMHF.RST, ATKINS
AMHERST, ATKINS
AMHERST, ATKINS
AMHERST, DEAD END, A/C
AMHERST, GOLF COURSE, A/C
AMHERST, N, E, ST., A/C
AMHEPST, N. E. ST., A/C
AMHIfRST, N. E. ST., A/C
BILLIRICA, A/C SHEET PLANT
BOSTON
BOSTON
BOSTON
BOSTON, NEWTON
BOSTON, NORUMBEGA
BOSTON, NORUMBFGO PE5.
BOSTON, NORUMBEGO STA.
(JOSTON, NORUMBEGO STA.
BOSTON, NOPUMBEGO STA.
BOSTON, NORUMBEGO STA.
ID
TYPE SOURCE MILES DATE AMPHIBOLE
A-C PIPE COLLECTED MFL
PAGE 26
CHRYSOTILE BLANK MET LAB
MFL MFL
KEF
5424
5479
397BO
39760F
5426
5425
54)8
39782
KDV
39781
39779
16138
M2
MI
5427
NMI
5426
F
P.
U
D
F
P
R
D
D
D
D
D
D
F
R
R
R
S
s
S
c
s
s
s
0.00
0.00
0.00
o.oo
0.00
0,00
0.00
0.00
J2/00/77
12/00/77
06/29/78 B
06/29/78 B
12/00/77
12/00/77
12/00/77
06/27/78 B
07/07/78
06/29/78 B
06/29/78 B
10/07/76 B
07/07/78 B
07/07/78 B
12/00/77
07/07/78 B
00/00/76 B
12/00/77
0.050
0.050
o.os'o
3,700
O.OSO
0,050
0.050
0.500
O.SOO
0.100
0.120
B
B
N
B
N
N
N
B
N
B
18.000
97.000
0.050
0.050
6.000
18.000
18.000
0.200
44.800
0.050
0.200
0.150 N
1.200
0.500
3.000
O.SOO
0.120
15,000
0.100
22392
0.00
04/01/75 B
03/25/75 B
03/26/75
03/27/75 B
12/04/75 B
12/05/75
0.070
1. 100
1.300
0.500
N
B
B
B
0.400
1.100
0.680
1.300
0.500
>9999.999
s
s
s
s
0
0
0
1
0
2
2
2
0
.00
.00
.00
.50
.90
.20
.20
.20
.00
06/27/75
09/12/75
06/25/76
07/26/76
07/28/76
06/27/75
09/12/75
06/25/76
07/24/75
06/06/76
06/06/76
06/16/76
03/00/76
08/05/76
08/05/76
07/25/75
07/25/75
07/25/75
07/25/75
B
B
B
N
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
0.
0.
0.
9.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1,
0.
020
050
030
600
100
020
020
020
200
050
050
010
too
600
030
400
300
N
N
B
N
B
B
B
B
B
N
B
B
0
0
0
190
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
6
.100
.200
.030
.000
,100
.120
.200
.100
.200
.050
.050
.010
.100
.600
.030
.400
,300
.700
25022
25082
35452
35458
35459
25Q21
25083
35453
25094
25094
25094
25090 F
R
R
(TYPE) F*FINISHED AT SOURCE DaDISTRIBUTION R = RAW E=PLANT DISCHARGE EFFLUENT
(SOURCE) 5«SURFACE, W»WELL, CsCISTEPN, B=COMBINED
(B/N) 8«BELOW DETECTION LIMIT NaNOT STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT
(METHOD:) M«MILLIPORE COND. WASH., N=NUCLEPOHIT JAFFE, D=DRQP, L=MILI,IPORE JAFFE-WICK, B=UOUBLE NUCLEPORE FILTER
(LAB) EPCsEPA, CINCINNATI EPDzFPA. DULUfH EfG=tPA, ATHENS, GA MCC«MCCRONE ASSOCIATES, UIL=UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS, DOW«
DOW CHEMICAL, MIDLAND, MI., UCHsU. UF CALIK., BFlKKtLFY, WISsWISC. DEPT, OF NATURAL RESOURCES, UWA = U. WASH., SEATTLE, MSB" MT,
SINAI HOSP., NEW YORK, NMtsNEW MEXICO 1NST. 0^ MINING, CMC=CITY OF CHICAGO WATER PURIFICATION LABORATORY, MDH"MINN. DEPT, OF HEALT
UMDsUNIV. OF MINN., DULDTH
N EPG
N CFG
N EPC
N EPC
N tPG
N EPG
N EPG
N EPC
N EPC
N EPC
N EPC
N EPC
N EPC
N EPC
N EPG
N EPC
M MCC
N tPG
M EPC
M MCC
M MCC
M MCC
M MCC
M MCC
M EpC
M EPC
M EPC
M EPC
M EPC
M EPC
M EPC
M EPC
M MCC
M EPC
M EPC
M EPC
M MCC
N EPD
M EPC
M MCC
M MCC
M MCC
M MCC
AR
AP
AB
AB
AP
AR
AR
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AR
AB
AZ
AR
AB
AD
AD
AD
AD
AD
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AC
AB
AB
AB
AC
AB
AC
AC
AC
AC
-------
06-2?
STATE
MA
MA
MA
MA
MA
MA
MA
MA
MA
MA
MA
MA
MA
MA
MA
MO
MD
MO
MD
MD
MO
MD
MD
MD
MD
MD
ME
ME
ME
MI
MI
Ml
MI
MI
MI
MI
MI
MI
MI
MI
MI
-79
CITY
BOSTON, NORUMBEGO SfA.
BOSTON, NORUMBEGO STA.
BOSTON, NORUMBEGO STA.
BOSTON, NORUMBEGO STA.
BOSTON, NORUMBEGO STA.
BOSTON, OUABBIN RES.
BOSTON, WACHUSETT RES.
CHICOPEE, WESTOVER AFB
CHICOPEE, WESTOVER AFB
CHICOPEE, WESTOVER AFB
CHICOPEE, WESTOVER AFB
CHICOPEE, WESTOVER AFB
CHJCOPFE, WESTOVER AFB
CHICOPEE, WESTOVER AFB
SPRINGFIELD
BALTIMORF ASHBURTON
BALTIMORE, ASHBURTON
BALTIMORE, ASHBURTON
BALTIMORE, FREEDOM DtST,
BALTIMORE, LIBERTY RES.
BALTIMORE, PATAPSCO ft.
POTOMAC, 12 HR.
POTOMAC, 12 HP.
POCKVILLE, 12 HR.
POCKVILLE, 1? HR,
SWANSON'S CREEK
PORTLAND
PORTLAND
PORTLAND
BAY CITY
EAGLE HARBOR, L, SUPERIOR
EAGLE HAPBOR, L, SUPERIOR
EAGLE HAPBOR, L. SUPERIOR
EAGLE HARBOR, L, SUPERIOR
EAGLE HARBOR, L. SUPERIOR
EAGLE HAPBOR, L, SUPERIOR
FAGLE HARBOR, L. SUPERIOR
EAGLE HARBOR, L. SUPERIOR
IRON RIVER
MAPQUETTE, L. SUPERIOR
MAROUETTE, L. SUPERIOR
ID IYPE
SOURCE MILES DATE AMPHIBOLE
A-C PIPE COLLECTED MFL
PAGE 27
CHPYSOTILE BLANK MET LAB
MFL MFL
RtF
35898
36705
36706
36708
36707
36705
36748
16532
26324
45586
45587
26326
45588
45589
26400
26400
26374
26374
32333
32332
32331
R
R
R
D
F
D
D
D
D
D
F
F
R
F
P
R
F
r
r
F
R
D
F
F
D
R
P
R
R
R
R
R
R
D
R
P
0.40
0.00
0.40
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.23
0.00
0.00
7
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
10/17/75
10/17/75
10/17/75 B
10/17/75
03/00/76 B
03/00/76 B
03/00/76 B
07/28/77 B
06/07/78 N
06/07/78 N
06/07/78
06/07/78 N
06/07/78 N
08/08/78 N
01/00/75 N
04/05/76 B
11/07/75 B
11/07/75 B
04/05/76 B
11/07/75 B
11/07/75 B
09/22/76 B
09/22/76 B
09/22/76 B
09/22/76 B
B
02/09/79 B
02/09/79 B
02/09/79 B
08/22/73 B
09/14/73
09/16/73
09/19/73
10/03/73
10/10/73 B
10/17/73 B
10/24/73
04/08/77 B
08/22/73
10/03/73 B
0.100
0.100
0.100
0.100
0.010
0.500
0,500
1.750
2.500
0.060
0.010
0,030
0,030
0,020
0.030
0.070
0.020
0.030
0.020
0.020
1.880
0,050
0.050
0.200
0.170
0.420
0,180
0.080
0.160
0.500
0.190
B
B
B
B
B
B
N
N
N
N
B
B
N
N
B
N
N
B
7.500
8.100
0.100
10,000
0.100
0,100
0.100
503,000
0,100
7,400
2.400
0,800
2.500
0.300
0.500
0.100
0,100
0.800
0.100
0.400
0.020
0.200
0.100
0.200
1.880
0.050 B
0.150 B
0.200 B
1.200
4.000
M MCC
M MCC
M MCC
M MCC
Kl MCC
M MCC
M MCC
M EPC
N EPC
M EPC
N EPC
N EPC
N EPC
N EPC
M EPC
M EPC
M EPC
M EPC
M EPC
M EPC
M EPC
M EPC
N EPC
M EPC
N EPC
M MCC
0.020 N EPC
0.020 N EPC
0.020 N EPC
L DOW
C ORF
c OPF
M MCC
C ORF
M MCC
C ORF
M MCC
M MCC
N EPO
C ORF
M MCC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AZ
AB
AB
AB
AE
AX
AX
AX
AX
AX
AX
AX
AX
AX
AX
S
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
(TYPE) F*FIN1SHEO AT SOURCE DamSTPIBUTION psRA* E*PLANT DISCHARGE EFFLUENT
(SOURCE) 5»SURFACE, W.WELL, C=C1STFPN, 6=COMBINKD
(B/N) BBBELOW DETECTION LIMIT N*NOT STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT
(METHODI) M»MJI,LIPORE COND. WASH., N»NUCLEPOHE JAFFE, D=DROP, L*MILLIPORE JAFFE-WICK, B»DOUBLE NUCLEPORE FILTER
(LAB) EPC*EPA, CINCINNATI EPDsEPA, DULUTH iPG = t,PA, ATHENS, GA MCC«MCCRONE ASSOCIATES, UIL»UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS, DOW«
DOW CHFMICAL, MIDLAND, MI., UCBsU. OF CALIF., BERKELEY, WJSsWISC. DtPT, OF NATURAL RESOURCES, UWAsU. WASH,, SEATTLE, MSS« MT,
SINAI HOSP., NFW YORK, NMUNEW "EXICO TNST. Of MINING, CMC*CITY OF CHICAGO WATER PURIFICATION LABORATORY, MDH«MINN, DEPT, OF HEALT
UMD«UNIV. OF MINN., DULUTH
-------
--a
o
06-27
STATE
MI
MI
MI
MI
MI
MI
MI
MI
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
-79
CITY
MAROUETTF.
WAPOUETTF,
MIDLAND
ONTONAGON.
ONTONAGON,
ONTONAGON,
(1NTONAGON,
ONTONAGON,
BEAVER BAY
BEAVER BAY
BFAVF.R BAY
BEAVER BAY
BEAVER BAY
BEAVER BAY
BEAVER BAY
BEAVFR BAY
BEAVF.R BAY
BEAVER BAY
Bfe'AVFR BAY
BEAVER «AY
BEAVER BAY
BEAVER BAY
CLOQUET
DULUTH
DULUTH
DUIUTH
DULUTH
DULUTH
DULUTH
DULUTH
DULUTH
nULUTH
DULUTH
DULUTH
DULUTH
DULUTH
DULUTH
DULUTH
DULUTH
DULUTH
DULUTH
DULUTH
DULUTH
DULUTH
DULUTH
L. SUPERIOR
L. SUPERIOR
L. SUPERIOR
L. SUPERIOR
L. SUPERIOR
L. SUPERIOR
L. SUPERIOR
, L. SUPERIOR
, L, SUPFRIOR
, L. SUPERIOR
, L. SUPERIOR
, L. SUPERIOR
, L, SUPERIOR
, L. SUPERIOR
, I, SUPERIOR
ID TYPE SOURCE
MILES DATE AMPHIBOLE
A-C PIPE COLLECTED MFL
PAGE 28
CHRYSOIILE BLANK MET LAS
MFL MFl
REF
0,00
0.00
7
0.00
0.00
0,00
0.00
0,00
0,00
?
?
?
7
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0,00
0,00
0.00
7
7
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
o.oo
0.00
10/10/73
10/17/73
08/22/73
09/19/73 B
10/03/73
10/10/73 B
10/17/73 B
07/00/73
07/00/73
08/28/73
08/28/73
08/28/73
08/28/73
08/22/73
08/29/73
09/14/73
10/03/73
10/10/73
10/17/73
10/34/73
11/14/73
03/21/74 N
08/22/73
08/28/73
08/28/73
09/26/73
10/03/73
10/24/73
11/14/73
04/00/74
06/05/74
06/07/74
06/13/74
06/17/74
06/24/74
06/28/74
07/00/74
07/03/74
07/19/74
07/23/74
0,270
0.170
0.600
0,700
0.480
5,300
3,000
61.000
31.000
92,000
77.000
8,500
5.100
0.170
1.200
2.400
6,600
0.650
59.000
2.000 N
4,800 0.400
35,000
1.100 B
10,000
4,600
14.000
15,000
2.200
1.100
1,900
0.100
8,000
16,000
46,000
33.250
10.640*
6,030
5.540
10.000
2.990
266.000
26,000
C
M
L
C
C
M
C
M
M
B
N
N
N
N
M
C
C
M
M
M
M
M
N
M
L
M
L
M
N
N
M
M
M
M
B
M
M
N
N
N
N
B
N
N
N
OKF
MCC
DON
ORF
ORF
MCC
ORF
MCC
MCC
UCB
MSS
MSB
MES
MSS
MCC
DBF
OHF
MCC
MCC
MCC
MCC
MCC
MIS
EPC
DON
EPC
DOW
MCC
MSS
MSS
MCC
MCC
MCC
MCC
UCB
DOW
DOW
UMD
UMD
UMD
UMD
UCB
UMD
UMD
UMD
AX
AX
AE
AX
AX
AX
AX
AX
AL
AL
AN
AN
AN
AN
AX
AX
AX
AX
AX
AX
AX
AX
AF
AA
AE
AA
AE
AX
AN
AN
AX
AX
AX
AX
AL
AY
AY
AY
AY
AL
AY
AY
AY
(TYPE) FsFtNISMEO AT SOURCE D*DJSTRIBUT10N RsRAW EsPLANT DISCHARGE EFFLUENT
(SOURCE) SmSURFACE, WaWELL, C*CtSTERN, B=CnMBJN6.D
(B/N) B*BELOW DETECTION LIMIT NsNOT STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT
(METHODl) MsMILLIPORE COND. WASH., NsNUCLEPOHt JAFFE, D=DROP, LsMILLIPORE JAFFE-WICK, BoDOUBLE NUCLEPORE FILTER
(LAB) EPC«EPA, CINCINNATI EPDsFPA, UULUTH E-PGsEPA, ATHENS, GA MCC=MCCRONE ASSOCIATES, UIL«UNIVERSlTY OF ILLINOIS, DOW«
DOW CHEMICAL, MIDLAND, "I., UCP = U. OF CALIF., BERKELEY, WTS = WISC. Of.PT, OF NATURAL RESOURCES, UwA=U. WASH., SEATTLE, MSS" MT,
SINAI HOSP,, NFW YORK, NMIsNEVi MKX1CO INST, Ut MINING, CMrsClTY OF CHICAGO WATER PURIFICATION LABORATORY, MDH"MINN, DEPT, OF HEALT
UMD=UNIV, OF MINN,, DULUTH
-------
06-27-79
STATE
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
CITY
DUIUTH
DULUTH
DULUTH
OULUTH
DULUTH
DULUTH
DULUTH
DULUTH
DULUTH
DULUTH
DULUTH
DULUTH
OULUTH
DULUTH
DULUTH
DULUTH
DULUTH
DULUTH
DULUTH
DULUTH
DULUTH
DULUTH
DULUTH
DULUTH
DULUTH
DULUTH
DULUTH
DULUTH
DULUTH
DULUTH
DULUTH
DULUTH
DULUTH
DULUTH
OULUTH
DULUTH
DULUTH,
DULUTH,
DULUTH,
DULUTH,
DULUTH,
DULUTH,
DULUTH,
DULUTH,
DULUTH,
OUI.UTH,
DULUTH,
DIST.
DI5T,
DIST.
DIST.
DIST.
rlLTFR
FILTER
FILTER
FILTER
FILTER
FILTER
SYS. t
SYS. 1
SYS. 2
SYS. 3
SYS. 4
PLANT
PLANT
PLANT
PLANT
PLANT
PLANT
TO
16
2
3
4
5
6
TYPE
R
R
P
R
P
P
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
D
0
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
F
F
F
F
F
F
SOURCE MILES
S
5
a
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
8
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
a
6
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
A-C
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
n
0
0
0
0
PIPE
.00
.00
.00
.00
,00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
,00
,00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
T
?
7
T
t
1
1
1
,00
.00
,00
,00
.00
.00
DATE
COLLECTED
07/30/74
07/35/74
08/01/74
08/06/74
08/08/74
08/13/74
08/15/74
08/20/74
08/22/74
08/2J/74
08/28/74
08/30/74
09/04/74
09/06/74
09/09/74
09/11/74
09/13/74
09/16/74
09/17/74
09/19/74
09/20/74
01/11/75
01/25/75
02/14/75
02/14/75
03/25/75
03/25/75
04/29/75
07/14/75
05/03/76
05/03/76
05/26/76
05/26/76
05/26/76
05/26/76
05/26/76
07/00/73
07/00/73
07/00/73
07/00/73
07/00/73
01/01/77
01/11/77
01/13/77
01/18/77
01/18/77
01/20/77
AMPHIBOLE CHRYSOTILE
26
60
30
10
15
20
R
25
13
17
10
17
30
13
15
13
30
20
12
13
19
220
502
45
125
644
300
110
82
140
120
222
216
230
216
233
5
2
2
1
0
0
0
B 0
B 0
0
MFL
,600
.500
.000
.200
.100
,000
.980
.300
.600
.000
.400
.800
.300
.600
.400
.000
.000
.300
.800
.800
.100
.000
.000
.000
,000
,000
.000
.000
.000
.000 B
.000 B
,000 B
.000 N
.000 B
,000 N
.000 N
.000
,800
.000
.000
.400
.300
.600
,200
,200
.600
MFL
2.000
5.000
2.000
2.000
2.000
PAGE 29
BLANK MET
MFL
LAB
REF
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
M
N
N
N
N
N
B
M
B
B
B
N
N
N
N
N
N
UMD
UMD
UMD
UMD
UMD
UMD
UMD
UMD
UMD
UMD
UMD
UMD
UMD
UMD
UMD
UMD
UMD
UMD
UMD
UMD
UMD
EPD
EPD
MSB
EPD
EPD
MSS
EPD
EPD
EPC
EPC
EPD
EPD
EPD
EPD
EPD
UCB
MCC
UCB
UCB
UCB
UMD
UMD
UMD
UMD
UMD
UMD
AY
AY
AY
AY
AY
AY
AY
AY
AY
AY
AY
AY
AY
AY
AY
AY
AY
AY
AY
AY
AY
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AB
AB
AS
AS
AS
AS
AS
AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
AP
AP
AP
AP
AP
AP
(TYPF) F«FINISHED AT SOURCE D*DISTRIRUTION RsRAW E=PLANT DISCHARGE EFFLUENT
(SOURCE) 5*SUPFACEf WsHIELL, C«CISTERN, B*COMH1NED
(B/N) B«BELOM DETECTION LIMIT N»NOT STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT
(METHODJ) M«MILLIPORE COND. WASH,, N=NUCLEPORF. JAFFE, DSDROP, L=MILLIPORE JAFFE-WICK, B»OOUBLE NUCLEPORE FILTER
(LAB) EPC«EPA, CINCINNATI FpDzEPA, DULUTH F.PG = EPA, ATHENS, GA MCC = MCCPONF ASSOCIATES, U1L = UNIVERS1TY OF ILLINOIS. DON"
DOW CHEMICAL, MIDLAND, MI,, UCBrU, OF CALIF., BERKELEY, WISsWISC. DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES, UWA*U. WASH,, SEATTLE,, MSS» MT,
SINAI HOSP,, NEW YORK, NMJsNSW MEXICO 1NST. Oh MINING, C»«C=CIT» OF CHICAGO WATER PURIFICATION LABORATORY, MDH«MINN, DEPT, OF HEALT
UMDsUNIV. OF MINN., DULUTH
-------
•-J
N)
06-22
STATE
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
-79
CITY
DULUTH,
DULUTH,
DULUTH,
PULUTH,
DULUTH,
DULUTH,
DULUTH,
DULUTH,
DULUTH,
nULUTH,
DULUTH,
DULUTH,
DULUTH,
DULUTH,
DULUTH,
DULUTH,
DULUTH,
DULUTH,
DULUTH,
DULUTH,
DULUTH,
DULUTH,
DULUTH,
DULUTH,
DULUTH,
DULUTH,
DULUTH,
DULUTH,
DULUTH,
DULUTH,
DULUTH,
DULUTH,
DULUTH,
DULUTH,
DULUTH,
DULUTH,
DULUTH,
DULUTH,
DULUTH,
DULUTH,
DULUTH,
DULUTH,
DULUTH,
DUIUTH,
DULUTH,
DULUTH,
DULUTH,
FILTER
FILTER
FILTER
FILTER
FILTER
FILTER
FILTER
FILTER
FILTFP
FILTER
FILTER
FILTER
FILTFR
FILTER
FILTER
FILTER
FILTER
FILTER
FILTER
FILTER
FILTER
FILTER
FILTER
FILTER
FILTER
FILTER
FILTER
FILTER
FILTER
FILTER
FILTER
FILTER
FILTER
FILTER
FILTER
FILTER
FILTER
FILTER
FILTER
FILTER
FILTER
FILTER
FILTFR
FILTER
FILTER
FILTER
FILTER
PLANT
FL-ANT
PLANT
PL
-------
ID 11PE
SOURCE MILES DATE AMPHIBOLE
A-C PIPE COLLECTED MFL
PAGE 31
CHRYSOTILE BLANK MET LAB
MFL MFL
PEF
06-22-79
STATE CITY
MN OULUTH, FILTER PLANT
MN OULUTH, FILTFR PLANT
MN DUIUTH, FILTER PLANT
MN DULUTH, FILTER PLANT
MN DULUTH. FILTER PLANT
MN DULUTH, FILTER PLANT
MN DULUTH, FILTER PLANT
MN DULUTH, FILTER PLANT
UN nULUTH, FILTER PLANT
MN PULUTH, FILTER PLANT
MN DULUTH, FILTER PLANT
MN DULUTH, LOWER RESERVOIR
MN DULUTH, LOWER RF.SEPVOIP
MN DULUTH, MIDDLE RF.SEPVOIP
MN DULUTH, MIDDLE RESERVOIR
MN DULUTH, SYSTEM INTAKE
MN DULUTH, SYSTEM INTAKF
MN DULUTH, UPPER RESERVOIR
MN GRAND MARAIS
MN GRAND HARAIS, L. SUPERIOR
MN GRAND MAPAIS, L. SUPERIOR
MN GRAND MARAIS, L, SUPERIOR
MN GRAND MARAIS, -L. SUPERIOR
MN GRAND MARAIS, L. SUPERIOR
MN GRAND MAPAIS, L, SUPERIOR
MN GRAND MARAIS, L, SUPERIOR
MN GRAND MAPAIS. L, SUPERIOR
MN SILVER BAY
MN SILVER BAY
MN SILVER BAY
HN SILVFR BAY
MN SILVER BAY, FILTERED
MN SILVf.R BAY, FILTERED
MN SILVER BAY, L. SUPERIOR
MN SILVER BAY, L. SUPERIOR
MN SILVER BAY, L. SUPERIOR
MN SILVER BAY, L. SUPFRIOR
MN SILVER BAY, L. SUPERIOR
MN SILVER BAY, L. SUPERIOR
MN SILVER BAY, L. SUPERIOR
MN SILVER BAY, L. SUPERIOR
MN SILVER BAY, L. SUPERIOR
MN SILVER BAY, PAW
MN TWO HARBORS
MN TWO HARBORS
MN TWO HARBORS
MN THO HARBORS
(TYPE) F«FINI6HEO AT SOURCE D«DISTR1BUTtON PsRAW E«PLANT DISCHARGE EFFLUENT
(SOURCE) S«SUPFACE, W»WELL. C=CISTFKN, BsCOMBINED
(B/N) B»BELOW DETECTION LIMIT W»NQT ST'TISTtCALLY SIGNIFICANT
(METHODI) MaHILLIPORE COND. WASH,, NsNDCLEPORE. JAFFt, DsDPOP, LaMILLIPORK JAFFE-WICK, B«DOUBLE NUCLEPORE FILTER
(LAB) EPC«EPA, CINCINNATI EPDsEPA, DULUTH EPG=EPA, ATHENS, GA MCCzMCCRONE ASSOCIATES, UIL«UN1VERSITY OF ILLINOIS, DOW»
DOW CHEMICAL, MIDLAND, Ml., UCRsU. OF CALIF., BERKELEY, WIS=WISC. DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES, UWAsU. WASH., SEATTLE, MSS« MT.
SINAI HOSP., NfW YORK, NMIsHCW MEXICO INST. Of MINING, CMC^CITY OF CHICAGO WATER PURIFICATION LABORATORY, MUH'MINN. DEPT, OF HEALT
UMD*UNIV. OF MINN., DUI.UTH
230
243
247
2S1
257
259
2*2
264
266
273
2BO
15287
15286
13868
13867
13866
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
f
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
r
R
R
R
R
P
P
R
R
F
r
D
r
D
F
P
R
R
R
R
P
R
R
R
P
F
f
R
R
S
S
S
S
a
s
s
a
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
3
s
s
6
S
8
a
$
8
S
a
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
0.00
0,00
0.00
0.00
0,00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0,00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
o.w>
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
11/07/77
11/16/77
11/22/77
12/02/77
12/07/77
12/14/77
12/20/77
12/28/77
01/04/78
01/10/78
01/18/78
-------
06-22
STATE
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
-79
CITY
TWO HARBORS
TWO HARBORS
TWO HARBORS
TWO HARBORS
TWO HARBORS
TWO HARBORS
TWO HARBORS
TWO HARBORS
TWO HARBORS
TWO HARBORS
TWO HARBORS
TwO HARBORS
TWO HARBORS
TWO HARBORS
TWO HARBORS
TWO HARBORS
TWO HARBORS
TWO HARBORS
TW(J HARBORS
TWO HARBORS
TWO HARBORS
TWO HARBORS
TWO HARBORS, FILTERED
TWO HARBORS, FILTERED
TWO HARBORS. FILTERED
TWO HARBORS, L. SUPERIOR
TWO HARBORS, L. SUPERIOR
Two HARBORS, L, SUPERIOR
TWO HARBORS, PAW
INDEPENDENCE
INDEPENDENCE
KANSAS CITY
KANSAS CITY
KANSAS CITY
SPPINGFIFLD
ST. LOUIS
ST. LOUIS, A/C PIPE CO.
ST. LOUIS, A/C PIPE CO.
ST. LOUIS, A/C PIPE CO.
ST. LOUIS, A/C PIPE CO.
ST. LOUIS, A/C SHEET CO.
ST. LOUIS, A/C SHEET CO.
ST. LOUI5, A/C SHEET CO.
ST. LOUIS, A/C SHEET CO.
ST. LOUIS, A/C SHEET CD,
ID TYPE
SOURCE MILES DATE AMPHIBOLE
A-C PIPE COLLECTED MFL
PAGE J2
CHRYSOTILE BLANK MET LAB
MFL MFL
REF
15280
15282
12432
13870
12421
F
D
D
D
D
0
D
D
D
R
D
R
U
D
R
R
D
R
F
D
R
D
F
F
D
R
R
R
R
s
8
S
01/16/78
01/27/78
01/31/78
02/21/78
03/14/78
03/21/78
04/04/78
04/07/78
04/18/78
04/28/78
04/28/78
05/02/78
05/30/78
06/27/78
06/27/78
07/03/78
07/03/78
07/18/78
0.00 07/27/78
07/27/78
08/01/78
08/01/78
0.00 05/00/78
0.00 06/22/78
06/22/78
0.00 09/19/73
0,00 10/17/73
0.00 10/24/73
0.00 05/00/78
35.000
57.000
52.000
90.000
12.000
30.000
8,000
7.000
4.000
141.000
4.000
171,000
2,000
1.000
200.000
177,000
2.000
84.000
0.600
0.500
53,000
7.000
2.100
0,800
0.500
1.100
1.600
3,000
44.000
1,000
0,600
1.000
3.000
2.000
0.500
B 0.100
B 0.200
0,300
1.700
0,130
B 1,000
0,700
7,000
6.000
B 1.000
4.000
4.000
4.000
37,000
0,200
B
0
0
0
0
0
0
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
12/27/74
12/27/74
09/19/74
09/17/75
09/17/75
02/10/75
02/11/75
02/12/75
Ot/15/76
02/10/75
02/10/75
02/11/75
02/11/75
02/12/75
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
0.
0.
0.
5.
0.
1,
0.
o,
1.
0.
0.
4.
0.
070
070
020
700
400
000
400
900
500
too
too
700
400
B
B
N
B
B
B
N
B
B
N
B
0
0
0
5
0
0
1
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
.360
.580
.070
.700
.040
,300
.000
.400
.900
,900
.080
.100
.010
.160
.400
30807 F
30807 F
11105 F
R
F
F
F
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
(TYPE) F*FINISHED AT SOURCE D=niSTRI8UTIUN P=RAW E=PLANT DISCHARGE EFFLUENT
(SOURCE) S»SURFACE, WsWEI,L, C=CISTBRN, BsCOMBINED
(B/N) 6«BELOH DETECTION LIMIT NsNOT STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT
(METHODI) M«MILLIPORE COND. >««SH , NSNIJCLEPOHE JAFFE, O*UROP, L=MILLIPORE JAFFE-WICK, B«DOUBLE NUCLEPORE FILTER
(LAB) EPC»EPA, CINCINNATI EPDsFPA. DIILUTH EPG=EPA, ATHENS, GA MCC=MCCRONE ASSOCIATES, UIL=UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS, DOW»
DOW CHEMICAL, MIDLAND, MI., DCHsl). OF CALIF., BFRKFLEY, WIS = WISC. DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES, UWAsU. WASH., SEATTLE, MSS« MT.
SINAI HOSP., NffW YORK, NMlsNEW MITX ICO INST. Of MINING, CMC=CITY OF CHICAGO WATER PURIFICATION LABORATORY, MDHaMINN. DEPT, OF HEALT
UMOsUNIV. OF MINN., DULUTH
N CPD
N tPD
N EPD
N EPD
N ECU
N EPD
N EPD
N EPD
N EPD
N EPD
N EPD
N EPD
N EPD
N EPD
N EPD
N EPD
N EPD
N EPD
N MDH
N MOH
N EPD
N EPD
N MUH
N MDH
N MDH
C ORF
M MCC
M MCC
N MUH
M EPC
M EPC
M EPC
M MCC
M MCC
M EPC
M EPC
M MCC
M MCC
M MCC
M MCC
M MCC
M MCC
M MCC
M MCC
M MCC
AS
AS
AS
AS
AS
AS
AS
AS
AS
AS
AS
AS
AS
AS
AS
AS
AS
AS
AQ
AQ
AS
AS
AQ
AQ
AQ
AX
AX
AX
AQ
AA
AA
AA
AC
AC
AA
AA
AD
AD
AD
AD
AD
AD
AD
AD
AD
-------
06-22-79
STATE CITY
MO ST. LOUIS, A/C SHEET CO,
MO ST. LOUIS, INDUSTRY DISCHG.
MS JACKSON
MS JACKSON
MS JACKSON
MT BILLINGS
MT LAUREL
NC DURHAM
NC DURHAM
NC DURHAM
NC DURHAM
NC DURHAM
NC FAYETTEVtLLE, GLENVILLE
NC FAYETTEVILLE, HOFFER
NC MARSHVILI,E. ASRES. TEXTILE CO.
NC MARSHVILLF., ASBES. TEXTILE CO.
NH MERRIMAC RIVER, HUDSON
NH MEPRIMAC RIVF.R, NASHUA
NJ ROUNDBROOK, BRIDGE 206
NJ BOUNDBROPK, CANAL
NJ BOUNDBPOOK, MANVIL BRIDGE
NJ ELIZABETH
NJ ELIZABETH
NJ JERSEY CITY
NJ MANVILLE, AT ASBESTOS CO.
NJ MANVILLE, AT ASBESTOS CO.
NJ MANVILLE, AT ASBESTOS CO.
NJ MANVILLE, AT ASBESTUS CO.
NJ MANVILLE, AT ASBESTOS CO.
NJ MANVILLE, AT ASBESTOS CO.
NM ALBUQUERQUE, LEAVITT
NM ALBUQUERQUE, PUMPA
NM ALBUQUERQUE, PUMPA
NM ALBUQUERQUE, PUMPA
NM ALGODONES
ID TYPE SOURCE
MILES DATE AMPHIBOLE
A-C PIPE COLLECTED MFL
PAGE 33
CHRYSOTILE BLANK MET LAB
MFL MFL
REF
46725
12719
12719
17719
37890
37892
J5401
40714
40713
40712
40711
37460
37458
35465
35466
20301
20299
20300
12962
20298
24928
D
E
F
f
F
F
F
D
D
r
D
D
r
r
p
R
R
R
R
F
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.30
0.00
0.40
1.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
01/15/76 B
10/12/78 N
08/09/74 B
08/09/74 B
08/09/74 B
01/27/77 B
01/28/77 B
04/14/76 B
04/14/76 B
04/14/76 B
04/14/76 B
04/14/76 B
03/01/77 B
03/01/77 B
04/14/75 B
04/15/75
11/02/76 B
11/02/76 B
06/20/75 N
06/20/75 N
06/20/75 B
08/09/74 B
06/20/75 B
09/19/74 B
05/05/75 B
05/06/75 B
05/07/75 B
05/08/75 B
10/22/75 B
10/23/75 B
<09/00/76
<09/00/76
<09/00/76
<09/00/76
<09/00/76
0.200
7.000
0,020
0.020
0.020
0.030
0.050
0.010
0.050
0.010
0,010
0.010
0.010
0.030
0.100
0.100
0.100
0.500
0.100
0.100
0.020
0,010
0.070
0.500
0.200
0.300
0.500
0,300
0.300
B 0.200
2111.200
0,300
0.500
B
B
B
B
N
N
N
B
B
N
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
0.300
0.030 N
0.050 B
0.010
1.200
0.010
0.010
0.020
0.050
0.030 N
0,100
88.000
1.700
1.400
0,500
1.400
3,700
0.020
0,010
0,200
0,500
0.200
0.300
O.SOO
0.300
0.300
3.000
1.000
1.000
710.000
M MCC
N EPC
M EPC
M EPC
M EPC
0.090 M EPC
0.050 M EPC
M EPC
M EPC
M EPC
M EPC
M EPC
M EPC
0.060 M EPC
M MCC
M MCC
M EPC
M EPC
M EPC
M EPC
M EPC
M EPC
M EPC
M EPC
M MCC
M MCC
M MCC
M MCC
M MCC
M MCC
D NMI
D NMI
D NMI
D NMI
D NMI
AD
AB
AA
AA
AA
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AD
AD
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AA
AB
AA
AD
AD
AD
AD
AD
AD
AH
AH
AH
AH
AH
(TYPE) F*FINISHEO AT SOURCE DSDtSTRIBUTION R=PAW EsPLANT DISCHARGE EFFLUENT
(SOURCE) 5»SURFACE, WaWELL, C'CISTERN, B=COMBINED
(B/N) B*BE10W DETECTION LIMIT N»NO't STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT
(METHOD!) M«MTLLIPORE CONn. WASH., NaNUCLEPOPE JAFFE, DsDROP, LaMILLIPORE JAFFF-WICK, BsDOUBLE NUCLEPORE FILTER
(LAB) EPC»EPA, CINCINNATI EPDsFPA, DULUTH fcPG=EPA, ATHENS, GA MCC*MCCRONE ASSOCIATES, UIL=UNJVEPSITY OF ILLINOIS, DOW«
DOW CHEMICAL, MIDLAND, Mt., UCB«U. OF CALIF., RfRKELEY, WISsWISC. DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES, UMA*U. WASH,, SEATTLE, MSS« MT.
SINAI HOSP., NfW YORK, NMlaNEW MFXICU 1NST. Of MINING, CMC=C1TV OF CHICAGO "IATEH PURIFICATION LABORATORY, MDHsMINN, UEPT, OF HtALT
UMD»UNIV. OF MINN., DULUTH
-------
06-27-79
STATF
NM
MM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
CITY
BELEN, WELL 2
BELEN, HELL 4
HELEN, WtLL 4
PELEN, WELL 4
BELEN, WELL 4
KELLY RANCH
LAS CRUCES
LAS CRUCFS
LAS CRUCES
LAS CRUCrS
POJOAQUE
RIO, WELL 1
RIO, WELL 2
RIO, WELL 2
SANTA FE
SANTA FE DOWNS
SOCORRO. E. NORTH SPRING
SOCORRO, E. SOUTH SPRING
SncORRO, EAGLE PICTURE WELL
SOCOPRO, EVERGREEN SPRING
SOCOPRO, EVERGREEN SPRING
SOCORRO, MCCUTCHEON ST.
SOCORRO, MCCUTCHCON STREET
SOCORRO, N.M, TECH, SCHOOL
SOCORRO, N.M. TECH, SCHOOL
SOCORRO, SEDILLO PARK
SOCORRO, W, OF OS 60
SOCORRO, ZIMMfcPLY SCH.
SOCOPRO, ZIMMERLY SCHOOL
TRUTH OR CONSEQUENCES
TRUTH OR CONSEQUENCES
TRUTH OR CONSEQUENCES
BUFFALO
BUFFALO
ELMIRA
GLEN FALLS
LITTLE FALLS
LITTLE FALLS, INTAKE
LONG ISLAND, RAW WELL
MT, KISCO
NEW YORK CITY
NEW YORK, CENTRAL PARK RES.
NEW YORK, CENTRAL PARK RES.
NEW YORK, CENTRAL PAPK RES.
NEW YORK, CENTRAL PARK RES.
ID TYPE
41891
41892
41896
41893
41894
41895
F
D
F
D
D
F
D
D
F
F
F
F
D
F
D
F
F
F
F
F
F
0
D
D
D
F
F
D
r
F
F
D
19900
19901
19876
233J7
30563
30564
30225
SOURCE MILES DATE AMPHIBOLE
A-C PIPE COLLECTED MFL
PAGE 34
CHRYSOULE BLANK MET LAB
MFL MFL
PEF
0.00
0.00
0,00
0,00
0,00
1
0.00
0.00
0.00
<09/00/76
<09/00/76
<09/00/76
<09/00/76
<09/00/76
<09/00/76
<09/00/76
<09/00/76
<09/00/76
<09/00/76
<09/00/76
<09/00/76
<09/00/76
<09/00/76
<09/00/76
<09/00/76
11/07/78
11/07/78
11/07/78
<09/00/76
<09/00/76
11/07/78
<09/00/76
<09/00/76
11/07/78
<09/00/76
<09/00/76
11/07/78
<09/00/76
<09/00/76
<09/00/76
<09/00/76
11/00/74
11/05/74
10/11/74
08/28/74
12/13/77
12/13/77
05/00/76
08/27/76
<12/00/74
08/11/75
08/11/75
10/22/75
10/22/75
N
N
B
B
N
B
N
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
H
B
,8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.040
.040
.040
.040
.040
.040
.400
.020
.070
.070
.100
.300
.120
.020
.200
. too
.200
.250
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
N
N
N
N
B
B
8
B
N
N
B
B
N
B
B
B
B
438
194
too
1400
0
0
0
153
109
0
2100
1260
0
289
2190
0
1220
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.000
.000
.000
,000
,080 N
,120 N
.620 N
,000
.000
.080 N
,000
.000
.080 N
,000
.000
,040 N
,000
,400
.130
,400
.070
.100
.800
,500
.100
.200
,100
.200
.250
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
0
D
D
D
D
0.020 N
0.020 N
0.020 N
D
D
0.020 N
D
D
0.020 N
D
D
0.020 N
D
D
D
D
M
H
M
M
M
M
M
M
R
M
M
M
M
NMI
NMI
NMI
NMI
NMI
NMI
NMI
NMI
NMI
NMI
NMI
NMI
NMI
NMI
NMI
NMI
EPC
EPC
EPC
NMI
NMI
EPC
NMI
NMI
EPC
NMI
NMI
EPC
NMI
NMI
NMI
NMI
LfC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
MCC
EPC
MSS
MCC
MCC
MCC
MCC
AH
AH
AH
AH
AH
AH
AH
AH
AH
AH
AH
AH
AH
AH
AH
AH
AB
AB
AB
AH
AH
AB
AH
AH
AB
AH
AH
AB
AH
AH
AH
AH
AB
AA
AA
AA
AB
AB
AZ
AB
AG
AC
AC
AC
AC
(TYPE) F«FINISHED AT SOURCE D*otsTRi8UTiON PSRAW E=PLANT DISCHARGE EFFLUENT
(SOURCE! S»SURFACE, W.WELL, CsCISTERN, B=COMHIN£D
(B/N) 8"BELOW DETECTION LIMIT N«NOT STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT
(METHODl) MzMILLIPORE COND. WASH., NiNUCLEPOHE JAFFE, D=DROP, L*MILL1POR£ JAFFE-WICK, BoDOUBLE NUCLf.POPE ULTER
(LAB) EPC*EPA, CINCINNATI EPDsEPA, DULU1H EPG=EPA, ATHENS, GA MCC=MCCRONE ASSOCIATES, UILeUNlVERSITY OF ILLINOIS, DOVU
DOW CHEMICAL, MIDLAND, MI., ucasu. OF CALIF., BERKELEY, wis=wisc. DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES, UWA=U. WASH., SEATTLE, MSS« MT.
SINAI HOSP., NJW yORK, NMIsNFW MEXICO INST. at MJNING, C"*C=rtTY OF CHICAGO WATER PURIFICATION LABORATORY, MDH«MINN, DEPT. OF HF.ALT
UMD«UNIV. OF MINN., DULUTH
-------
06-22-79
STATE
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
CITY
NEW YORK, HILLVIEW RES.
NEW YORK, HILLVIEW RES.
NEW YORK, HILLVIEW RES.
NEW YORK, HILLVIFW RES.
NEW YORK, HILLVIEW RES.
NEW YORK, JEROME PAHK PES.
NEW YORK, JEROME PARK RES.
NEW YORK, JEROME PARK RES.
NIAGARA FALLS
NIAGARA FALLS
OSWEGO CITY
OSWEGO, METRO, WATER BOARD
ROCHESTER
ROCHESTF.R
BAPBERTON, NEAR
BARBFRTON, NEAP
BARBERTON, NEAR
CINCINNATI
CINCINNATI
CLYDE
DAYTON
FAIRBOPN
FREEMONT
KENT
LAKE. ERIFi TOLEDO
MARIETTA
MILFOPD, CISTERN
NOPTHR1DGE
NOPTHRIDGE
NORTHRIDGE
NORTHPIDGE, A/C
NORTHRIDGE, A/C
NOPTHRIDGE, A/C
NORTHRIDGE, A/C
NflPTHPlDGE, A/C
NOPTHRI.DGE, A/C
NOPTHPIDCE, A/C
NOPTHRIDGE, A/C
NORTHRIDGE. A/C
NOPTHRIOGE, A/f
NOPTHRIDGE, A/C
NOPTHRIDGE, A/C
NORTHBIDGE, WTP
NOPTHRIDGE, WTP
NOPTHRIDGE, WTP
ID TYPE SOURCE MILES DATE AMPHIBOLE
A-C PIPE COLLECTED MFL
PAGE 35
CHRYSOTILE BLANK MET LAB
MFL MFL
REF
19902
19903
30293
30291
19882
19894
E9501
E9502
E9507
37308
22798
37305
37309
320
26542
39795
26181
32907
35436
26180
26179
26194
26193
32924
32925
32999
33000
40702
40703
35435
35434
J2923
3J998
40701
F
R
R
F
R
P
R
F
R
F
F
F
F
R
R
E
P
D
D
F
F
F
F
F
R
D
F
F
F
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
F
F
F
S
s
S
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
8
a
w
8
8
C
w
VI
H
N
H
H
W
W
H
W
W
W
H
W
W
W
W
W
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.00
2.50
2.00
t.oo
2.50
2.00
2.50
2.00
2.50
2,00
2.00
2.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
08/11/75
08/11/75
10/22/75
10/22/75
10/22/75
08/11/75
10/22/75
10/22/75
11/00/74
11/08/74
11/30/76
11/30/76
10/25/74
11/00/74
08/16/75
08/16/78
08/16/78
07/31/74
04/25/77
11/02/76
01/00/75
10/27/76
11/02/76
02/05/75
08/00/76
04/01/75
07/30/78
06/04/75
07/08/15
04/13/76
06/04/75
06/04/75
07/08/75
07/08/75
09/26/75
09/26/75
11/24/75
11/24/75
02/09/76
02/09/76
04/13/76
04/13/76
09/26/75
11/24/75
02/09/76
e
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
N
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
R
B
B
N
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
N
B
B
B
B
0.200
0.360
0.250
0.200
0,250
0.200
0.250
0.200
0.100
0.070
0.010
0.010
0.020
0.020
0.300
0.090
0.300
0.020
0.050
0.010
0.010
0.070
0.050
0.200
0.100
0.020
0.100
0.050
0.100
0.050
0.050
0.050
0.100
0.100
0.100
o.voo
0.070
0,070
0.050
0.050
0.200
0.050
0.100
0.070
0,100
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
N
N
N
B
N
N
N
N
B
B
N
B
B
B
B
N
N
N
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
N
B
B
N
N
B
B
B
0.200
0.360
0.250
0.200
0.250
0.200
0.250
0.200
0.200
0.400
0.050
0.050
0,020
0.100
1,500
4.700
1 .500
0.070
0.050
0.010
0,050
0.070
0.010
0,200
0.100
0.070
0.300 N
0.200
0,100
0.050
0.050
0.050
0.100
0.100
0.100
0.100
0.070
0.400
0.050 N
0.050 N
0.200
0.200
0.100
0,070
0.100 N
M
M
H
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
N
N
N
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
0.100 N
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
0.100 M
0,100 M
M
M
M
M
0.200 M
KCC
MCC
MCC
MCC
MCC
MCC
MCC
MCC
EPC
fcPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
tPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
MCC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
PfcC
PEC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AB
AA
AH
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AA
AB
AB
AA
AB
AB
AB
AZ
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
(TYPE) F«FINISHED AT SOURCE DsDISTHlBUlION ReRAW E=PL»NT DISCHARGE EFFLUENT
(SOURCE) S»SUPFACE. W«hELL, CsCISTERN, PcCOMBINED
(B/N) B*BELOW DETECTION LIMIT N»NOT STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT
(METHODl) MBMlLLIPOPE COND. WASH.. NsNUCLEPOBE JAFFE, D*DPOP, L=M1LLIPORE JAFFE-WICK, BsDOUBLE NUCLEPOHE fILlER
(LAB) EPC«EPA, CINCINNATI EPD=EPA, OULUTH EPCSEPA, ATHENS, GA MCC=MCCRONE ASSOCIATES. UIL»UNIVEPSITY OF ILLINOIS, DOW»
DOW CHEMICAL, MIDLAND, HI., UfBsU. Of CALIF., BERKELEY, WIS*WISC. DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES, UwAsll. HASH., SEATTLE, M5S« MT,
SINAI HOSP.. NFW YORK, NMIsNEW MEX1CU INsT. 0* MINING, CMC=CITY OF CHICAGO WATER PURIFICATION LABORATORY, MDH=M1NN, DEPT, OF HEALT
UPDaUNIV. OF MINN., DULtlTH
-------
PEF
oo
06-22-79 PAGE 36
STATE CITY ID IXPE SOURCE MILES DATE AMPHIBOLE CHRYSOT1LE BLANK MET LAB
A-C PIPE COLLECTED MFL MFL MFL
OH S. CENTRAL SOFTENED WELL
OH SCIOTO RlV., SOUTH-CEN. OH,
OH SIDNEY
OH SIDNEY
OH SIDNEY
OH SIDNEY
OH XENIA
OK MUSKOGEE
OK TULS»
OK VERDIGRIS RIVER* INOLA
OR NEWPORT
OR NEWPORT, CITY HALL
OR NEWPORT, MUN. SWIM
PA BETHLEHEM
PA CONEMAUGH RIV., CENTRAL PA.
PA CROOKED CREEK, SHELOCTA
PA DELAWARE RIVER, EATON
PA ERIE
PA ERIE, AT ASBESTOS PAPER CO.
PA ERIE, AT ASBESTOS PAPGR CO.
PA ERI£, AT ASBESTOS PAPER CO.
PA FRIE, AT ASBESTOS PAPGR CO.
PA NEW CHESTER
PA OHIO RIVER, CENTRAL PA.
PA PAINT TWp,, CORNER W/S
PA PAINT TWP., CORNER W/S
PA PAINT TWP, CLARION CO.
PA PAINT TWP, CLARION CO,
PA PAINT, CLARION co.
PA PAINT, CLARION CO,
PA PHILADELPHIA, RELMONT
PA PHILADELPHIA, BELMONT
PA PHILADELPHIA, BELMONT
PA PHILADELPHIA, BELMONT
PA PHILADELPHIA, BELMONT
PA PHILADELPHIA, BELMONT
PA PHILADELPHIA, BELMONT
PA PHILADELPHIA, BELMONT
PA PHILADELPHIA, BELMONT
PA PHILADELPHIA, BELMONT
PA PHILADELPHIA, BELMONT
(TYPF) F'FINISHED AT SOUPCC D*0ISTPI HUT ION RERAW £«PLANT DISCHARGE EFFLUENT
(SOURCE) S»SURF»CE» W«WELL. C'CISTERN, B*CO«B1NED
(8/N) B«BELOW DETECTION LIMIT N«NOT STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT
(METHODD M»MILLIPOPE CONO, WASH., N«NUCLEPOHE JAFFE, D»DPOP, L»MILLIPORE JAFFE-WICK, BSDOUBLE NUCLEPOPE FILTER
(LAB) EPC»EPA, CINCINNATI EPDiFPA, DULUTH ECGzCPA, ATHENS, GA MCC=MCCRONE ASSOCIATES, UIL*UNIVERSHY OF ILLINOIS, DOW*
DOW CHEMICAL, MIDLAND, MI,, UCfi»U. OF CALIF., BERKELEY, wiSzWISC. DEPT, OF NATURAL RESOURCES, UWA»U, WASH,, SEATTLE, MSS« MT.
SINAI HOSP., NEW YORK, NMIsNEW MEXICO 1NST, Of MINING, CMC«CITY OF CHICAGO WATFR PURIFlCAT10r4 LABORATORY, MDH«MINN, DEPT, OF HEALT
UMDaUNIV. OF MINN., DULUTH
36641
36640
41802
41801
37302
18039
18040
40612
40613
40611
22903
17717
16139
46707
46706
46706
46707
40752
16135
R
R
F
r
F
F
F
R
F
D
0
F
R
R
R
F
D
D
D
D
D
R
D
D
D
D
F
D
R
R
R
F
F
R
F
R
F
R
F
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
.00
.00
?
1
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
,00
.00
.00
.00
02/00/76
00/00/76
06/07/77
06/07/77
12/16/77
12/16/77
10/25/76
10/08/74
10/10/74
08/00/77
12/17/75
12/17/75
12/17/75
10/08/74
05/00/77
05/00/77
08/00/77
09/19/74
07/08/75
07/08/75
07/09/75
11/06/75
11/06/76
05/00/77
10/12/78
10/12/78
10/J2/78
10/12/78
09/15/76
09/15/76
05/14/75
05/14/75
05/14/75
05/14/75
10/27/75
10/27/75
10/27/75
04/01/76
04/01/76
04/02/76
04/02/76
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
N
N
B
B
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
.140
,470
.060
.060
,060
.060
,010
.020
.020
.314
,070
.100
.200
.050
.063
.084
,230
.020
.100
.100
.300
.157
.250
.050
.010
,700
.700
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
N
N
N
B
B
B
N
B
B
B
B
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
2.
0.
9.
160.
0.
0.
4.
5.
5.
4,
0.
19.
24.
84.
0.
26.
230.
130,
7.
1.
50.
4.
047
470
060
060
060
060
010
020
020
314
500
700
BOO
200
063
084
230
070
500
100
900
000
300
157
200
700
700
200
010
000
000
000
750
000
000
000
700
100
000
300
H MCC
M MCC
M EPC
M EPC
M EPC
M EPC
M EPC
M EPC
M EPC
M MCC
M EPC
M EPC
M EPC
M EPC
M MCC
M MCC
M MCC
M EPC
M MCC
M MCC
M MCC
M MCC
M EPC
M MCC
N EPC
N EPC
N EPC
N EPC
M EPC
M EPC
M MCC
M MCC
M MCC
M MCC
M MCC
M MCC
M MCC
M MCC
M MCC
M MCC
M MCC
AZ
AZ
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AA
AA
AZ
AB
AB
AB
AA
AZ
AZ
AZ
AA
AD
AD
AD
AD
AB
AZ
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
-------
vo
06-22-79
STATE
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
CITY
PHILADELPHIA, BELMONT
PHILADELPHIA, BELMONT
PHILADELPHIA, RELMONT
PHILADELPHIA, BELMONT
PHILADELPHIA, BELMONT
PHILADELPHIA, BELMONT 12 HP
PHILADELPHIA, BELMONT 12 HR
PHILADELPHIA, QUEEN LANE 12 HR
PHILADELPHIA, QUEEN LANE 12 HR
PHILADELPHIA, QUEENLANE
PHILADELPHIA, QUEENLANE
PHILADELPHIA, QUEENLANE
PHILADELPHIA, QUEENLANE
PHILADELPHIA, QUEENLANE
PHILADELPHIA, GUEENLANE
PHILADELPHIA, OUEENLANE
PHILADELPHIA, QUEENLANE
PHILADELPHIA, OUEENLANE
PHILADELPHIA, QUEENLANE
PHILADELPHIA, QUEENLANE
PHILADELPHIA, OUEENLANE
PHILADELPHIA, QUEENLANE
PHILADELPHIA, QUEENLANE
PHILADELPHIA, QUEENLANE
PHILADELPHIA, TORRESDALE
PHILADELPHIA, TORRESDALE
PHILADELPHIA, TORRESDALE
PHILADELPHIA, TORRESDALE
PHILADELPHIA, TORRESDALE
PHILADELPHIA, TORRESDALE
PHILADELPHIA, TORRESDALE
PHILADELPHIA, TQRRESDALE
PHILADELPHIA, TORRESDALE
PHILADELPHIA, TORRESDALE
PHILADELPHIA, TORRC8DALE
PHILADELPHIA, TORRESOALE
PHILADELPHIA, TORRCSDALE
PHILADELPHIA, TORRESDALE
PHILADELPHIA, TORRESDALE
PHILADELPHIA, TORRESDALE 12 HR
PHILADELPHIA, TORRCSDALE 12 HR
SOUTH PITTSBURGH
SUSOUEHANNA RIV., HARRISBURH
SUSQUEHANNA RIV., M. BRANCH
TWO-tlCK CREEK, HOMER CITY
ID
3-10-F
3-81-R
3-2-F
3-S2-R
45S94
22996
45595
22997
2-n-F
2-i2-r
2-2-r
i-i2-r
1-S2-R
i-2-r
45593
22998
26209
TYI
F
f
F
r
F
F
F
F
R
R
R
F
F
R
R
r
R
F
F
r
F
F
r
r
R
r
r
F
R
F
R
R
R
r
P
r
T
F
F
R
R
P
ID
3-10-F
3-81-R
3-2-F
3-S2-R
45594
22996
45595
22997
2-n-F
2-12-F
2-2-r
i-12-r
1-S2-R
1-2-F
45593
22998
26209
TYPE SOURCE
F
f
F
r
F
F
F
F
R
R
R
F
F
R
R
r
R
F
F
r
F
F
r
r
R
r
F
F
R
F
R
R
R
r
P
r
T
F
F
R S
R S
P 8
MILES
A-C PIPE
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0,00
0.00
DATE
COLLECTED
08/02/76
10/00/77
12/14/77
02/00/78
12/21/78
09/16/76
11/03/76
09/16/76
11/03/76
04/01/75
04/02/75
05/14/75
05/14/75
05/14/75
05/14/75
10/27/75
10/27/75
10/27/75
04/01/76
04/02/76
08/02/76
11/00/77
12/00/77
02/00/78
05/14/75
05/14/75
10/27/75
10/27/75
10/27/75
04/01/76
04/01/76
04/02/76
04/02/76
05/14/76
05/14/76
08/02/76
l?/00/77
12/21/77
02/00/78
09/16/76
11/03/76
12/00/74
09/00/77
08/00/77
05/00/77
AMPHIBOLE
MFL
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
P
B
B
8
0,200
0.010
0.010
0.030
0.070
0.020
0.030
0.020
0.030
0,100
0,100
0,100
1,000
0.100
0,100
0.100
0.100
0.200
0.030
0.100
0.010
0.100
0.250
2.500
0.200
0.020
0.030
0.010
0,020
0.030
0,070
0.630
0.029
0.063
CHRYSOTILE
MFL
B
N
B
N
N
N
B
N
B
B
B
B
B
B
N
B
B
B
N
B
N
N
N
N
B
B
B
B
0,200
0.030
7.590
0.020
14.570
0,100
0.030
0.130
0.200
24.000
120.000
70.000
0.100
11.000
1 .000
100,000
0.100
0.100
0.100
0.900
0.200
0.100
0.010
4.000
17,000
160.000
16.000
60.000
0.100
0.250
1.000
0.740
2.500
200.000
0,200
0.020
6.140
0.030
0.100
0.030
0.200
0.630
0.029
0.063
PAGE 37
BLANK MET LAB
MFL
REF
N EPD
M UWA
M DMA
M UXA
M UMA
M EPC
M EPC
M EPC
M EPC
M MCC
M MCC
» MCC
M MCC
M MCC
M MCC
« MCC
M MCC
M MCC
M MCC
M MCC
N EPD
M UWA
M UMA
M U*»A
M MCC
M MCC
M MCC
M MCC
M MCC
M MCC
M MCC
M MCC
M MCC
M MCC
M MCC
N EPD
M UWA
M UWA
M UWA
M EPC
M EPC
M EPC
M MCC
M MCC
M MCC
AS
AP
AP
AP
AP
AB
AB
AB
AB
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AS
AP
AP
AP
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AS
AP
AP
AP
AB
AB
AA
AZ
AZ
AZ
(TYPE) FmFJNISHED AT SOURCE D«DISTRIBUTION R»PAW E»PLANT DISCHARGE EFFLUENT
(SOURCE) S*6URFACE, WsMELL, OCISTERN, BsCOMBINfcD
(B/N) B«8EI/0» DETECTION LIMIT N«NOT STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT
(METHOD!).' M«MILLIPORE COND, WASH., NSNUCLEPOHE JAFFE, D*DROP. L*MILLIPORE JAFFE-WICK, B»DOUBLE NUCLEPORE FILTER
(LAB) EPC«EPA, CINCINNATI EPDsF.PA, DULUTH EPG»EPA, ATHENS, GA MCCcMCCRONE ASSOCIATES, UIL«UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS, DON*
DOW CHEMICAL, MIDLAND, MI., UCBaU. OF CALIF., BERKELEY. WISswiSC, DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES, UWA=U. WASH., SEATTLE, MSS* MI,
SINAI HOSP., NEW YORK, NMIxNEW MEXICO INST. Of MINING, CMCzCITY OF CHICAGO WATER PURIFICATION LABORATORY, MDH*MINN, DEP1. OF HEALT
UMD«UNIV. OF MINN., DULUTH
-------
06-22-79
STATE CITY
PR
SAN JUAN
PAGE 38
ID 1YPE SOURCE MILES DATE AMPHIBOLE CHRYSOTILE BLANK MET LAB
A-C PIPE COLLECTED MFL MFL MFL
31113
01/30/75 B 0.040 N 0.200
M EPC
REF
AA
RI NEWPOPT
RI NEWPORT
RI NEWPORT, 12 HR COMP.
SC ANDERSON
SC ANDERSON
SC ANDERSON
SC ANDERSON
SC ANDERSON
SC BISHOPVILLE
SC BISHOPVILLE, C.C. INDUSTRY
SC BISHOPVILLE, C.C. INDUSTRY
SC BISHOPVILLE, GIN ST.
SC BISHOPVILLE, INDUST. TRT.
SC BISHOPVILLE. REL ACAD.
SC BISHOPVILLE, HELL
SC CAMDEN
SC COLUMBIA
SC DOUGLAS-DUE WEST, BENTON HONE*
SC GREENVILLE
SC GREENVILLE
00 SC GREENVILLE
0 SC GREENVILLE, (1)
SC GREENVILLE, (1)
SC GREENVILLE, (2)
SC GREENVILLE, (2)
SC GREENWOOD, AT WTR. PLT.
SC GREENWOOD, CANTERBURY
SC GREENWOOD, CANTERBURY
sc GREENWOOD, CANTERBURY
SC GREENWOOD, CANTERBURY
SC GREENWOOD, CANTERBURY
SC GREENWOOD, EFFIE 35428 D 2.50 03/02/76 N 0.050 0.200 6 0.010
SC GREENWOOD, EFFIE
SC GREENWOOD, EFFIE
SC GREENWOOD, EFFIE
SC GREENWOOD, EFFIE
SC GREENWOOD, EFFIE
sc GREENMOOD. EFFIE
SC N. CHARLESTON, ASBES. TXTL. CO
SC N. CHARLESTON, ASBES. TXTL. CO
SC N, CHARLESTON, ASBES, TXTL, CO
SC N. CHARLESTON, ASBES. TXTL. CO
(TYPE) F«FIN1SHED AT SOURCE D»DISTRIBUTlON R»RAW E«PLANT DISCHARGE EFFLUENT
(SOURCE) S«SURFACE. W«WELL« C'CISTFRN, B«COMBINED
CB/N) B«BELOW DETECTION LIMIT N*NOT STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT
(METHOOI) «»MILLIPORE COND. WASH., N*NUCLEPOKE JAFFE, D=DRDP, L«MILLIPOPE JAFFE-WICK, B»DOUBLE NUCLEPORE FILTER
(LAB) EPC«EPA, CINCINNATI EPDcF.PA, DULUTH EPGaEPA, ATHENS, GA MCCzMCCPONE ASSOCIATES, UILsUNI VEPSITY OF ILLINOIS, DQWK
DOW CHEMICAL, MIDLAND, MI., UCBsU. OF CALIF,, BERKELEY, WISxWISC. DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES, UWAiU, MASH,, SEATTLE, M5S= MT,
SINAI HOSP., UK" YORK, NMIsNEW MEXICO INST. Of MINING, CMC=CITY OF CHICAGO WATER PURIFICATION LABORATORY, MDH=MINN. DEPT. OF HEALT
UMD*UNIV, OF MINN., DULUTH
12965
12965
37129
21666
46729
46729
46730
41838
46730
41866
41837
46774
12609
46723
24508
35429
35483
40619
35499
35497
41850
35428
35447
40620
40618
3S498
35496
41852
F
F
F
R
F
F
R
0
D
R
D
D
F
D
F
D
D
R
R
F
r
F
F
F
D
D
0
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.50
.50
.50
.50
.50
.50
.50
09/05/74
09/05/74
08/17/76
04/10/75
04/10/75
11/26/75
11/26/75
11/08/76
11/00/78
10/25/78
10/25/78
06/20/78
11/00/78
06/20/78
06/20/78
10/24/78
07/00/74
11/20/78
11/06/74
04/10/75
11/26/75
04/10/75
11/26/75
04/10/75
11/26/75
03/02/76
04/28/78
06/02/78
08/01/78
09/22/78
11/17/78
03/02/76
04/21/76
04/28/78
06/02/78
08/01/78
09/22/78
11/17/78
04/08/75
04/09/75
11/24/75
11/25/75
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
N
N
B
B
B
N
N
B
N
N
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
B
B
R
B
B
0.
0.
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
o.
o.
0.
0.
0.
0.
020
020
030
800
130
130
400
050
200
200
050
000
250
070
010
130
130
130
130
130
130
010
020
050
300
100
100
100
100
too
0.400
B
B
B
B
B
N
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
N
N
N
B
8
B
B
1.
0.
1.
0.
0.
0,
0,
118,
96.
0.
547.
0.
380.
0.
22.
0.
168.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
3.
1.
0.
3.
0.
2.
4.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
000
200
800
130
130
400
050
600
000
560
000
400
000
800
300
100
000
010
130
130
130
130
130
130
010 B
020
100
200
200 B
luo
100
500
000
000
730
100
100
100
100
M EPC
M EPC
M EPC
M MCC
M MCC
M MCC
M KCC
M EPC
N EPC
N EPC
N iPC
N EPC
N ECC
N EPC
N EPC
N EPC
M EPC
N EPC
M tVC
M MCC
M MCC
M MCC
M MCC
M MCC
M MCC
M EPC
N EPC
N EPC
N EPC
N EPC
N EPC
M -EPC
M EPC
N EPC
N E.PC
N EPC
N EPC
N EPC
M MCC
M MCC
M MCC
M MCC
AA
AA
AB
AD
AD
AD
AD
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AA
AB
AA
AD
AD
AD
AD
AD
AD
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AD
AD
AD
AD
-------
06-22-79
STATE
SD
SD
SD
TN
TN
TN
TN
TN
TN
TN
TN
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
IX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
cm
LEAD, HOMESTAKE MINE
LEAD, KOHBSTAKE MINE
LEAD, HOMESTAKC MINE
CHATTANOOGA
CHATTANOOGA
CHATTANOOGA
CHATTANOOGA
CHATTANOOGA
CLARKSVILLE
NASHVILLE
NASHVILLE
ABILENE
AMARILLO
AUSTIN, DAVIES
AUSTIN. GREEN
AUSTIN, ULLRICH
CLEBUPNE
CLEBUPNE
CLEBURNE, AC LINE
CLEBURNE, AC LINE
CLEBURNE, AC LINE
CLCBURNE, AC LINE
CLEBURNE, ASHED
CLEBURNE, ASHED
CLEBURNE, Cl LINE
CLEBURNE, CI LINE
CLEBUPNE, CI LINE
CLEBURNE, CI LINE
CLEBURNE, L.P, CLEBURNE
CLEBUPNE, MTP
CLEBURNE, KTP
CLFBURNE, WTP
DALLAS
DALLAS
HOUSTON
HOUSTON
HOUSTON
HOUSTON
HOUSTON
HOUSTON, SY8T, A
HOUSTON, SYST, B
HOUSTON, SYST. C
HOUSTON. SYST. D
PAGE 39
ID TYPE SOURCE MILES DATE AMPHIBOLE CHRYSOTILE BLANK MET LAB
A-C PIPE COLLECTED «FL KFL MFL
REF
12400
13930
21616
21616
12602
12966
37648
37847
37849
35440
35441
26186
32918
32991
40706
35442
35441
26185
32917
32990
40704
26184
32916
32989
40705
10842
10841
A2
Al
2-3178
1-3178
R
F
R
F
F
R
R
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
D
D
D
D
D
D
F
D
D
D
D
D
D
F
F
r
R
F
F
D
E
D
F
F
F
F
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
3
5
5
5
0
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.08
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
06/17/75
06/17/75
08/20/75
07/00/74
04/03/75
04/03/75
11/28/75
11/28/75
10/09/74
12/27/74
12/27/74
08/09/74
08/09/74
01/11/77
01/11/77
01/11/77
04/19/76
04/19/76
06/26/75
09/04/75
11/18/75
02/18/76
04/19/76
04/19/76
06/26/75
09/04/75
11/18/75
02/18/76
06/26/75
09/04/75
11/18/75
02/18/76
03/00/75
03/00/75
07/00/73
03/01/78
03/01/78
03/01/78
03/01/78
07/00/73
07/00/73
07/00/73
07/00/73
B
B
B
B
B
B
N
N
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
N
N
B
B
B
B
B
8
B
B
B
B
B
N
B
B
B
N
B
N
P
P
B
B
B
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.530
.800
.250
.020
.500
.130
.070
.070
.070
.020
.090
.030
.010
.010
,010
.030
.100
,200
.020
,020
.010
.020
.040
.040
.020
,020
.020
.040
,010
,050
.200
.250
.500
.100
.040
.040
.040
.040
B
B
B
B
B
B
N
N
B
N
B
N
N
B
N
B
N
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
N
N
N
N
0
0
0
0
4
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.530
.800
.250
.100
.700
.500
.750
.130
.090
.800
,400
,020
,070
,100
,010
.060
.010
.200
.300
.200
.020
.080
.010
.100
,200
.040
.020
.020
.500
.040
.010
.010
.200
.250
.500
.500
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
0,010
0.010
0.010
0.020
0.020
0.010
0.020
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
«
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
N
N
N
N
B
B
B
B
MCC
MCC
MCC
EPC
MCC
MCC
MCC
MCC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
MCC
MCC
MCC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
UCB
UCB
UCB
UCB
AD
AD
AD
AA
AD
AD
AD
AD
AA
AA
AA
AA
AA
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AC
AC
AL
AB
AB
AB
AB
AL
AL
AL
AL
(TYPE) F»FINISHED AT SOURCE D»DISTRIBUTION RaRAW E«PLANT DISCHARGE EFFLUENT
(SOURCE) S«SURFAC£, W«WELL, C«CISTEPN, ^COMBINED
(B/N) B*BELOH DETECTION LIMIT N«NOT STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT
(METHOD») M«MILLIPORE COND. WASH., NKNUCLEPORE JAFFF., DBDPOP, LXMJLLIPORE JAFFE-WICK, BCDOUBLE NUCLEPORE FILTER
(LAB) BPC«EPA, CINCINNATI EPDmEPA. DULUTH EPGaEPA, ATHENS, GA MCC«MCCRONE ASSOCIATES, UIL«UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS, DON*
DOW CHEMICAL, MIDLAND, MI., UCBsU. OF CALIF., BERKELEY, WIScWISC. DEPT. UF NATURAL RESOURCES. UWAsU. MASH,, SEATTLE, MSB* MT.
SINAI HOSP., NEW YORK, NMIsNE* MEXICO INST, Ot MINING, CMC=CITY OF CHICAGO WATKR PURIFICATION LABORATORY, MDH=M1NN. DEPT, OF HEALT
UMD-UNIV. OF MINN.. DULUTH
-------
oo
06-22-79
STATE
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VJ
VI
VI
VI
VT
VT
CITY
HOUSTON, SYST. E
LOCKHART
LOCKHART
LQCKHART
LOCKHART, AC LINE
LOCKHART, AC LINE
LOCKHAPT, AC LINE
LOCKHART, AC LINE
LOCKHART, CI LINE
LOCKHART, CI LINE
LOCKHART, CI LINE
LOCKHAPT, CI LINE
LUCKHART, WTP
LOCKHAPT, WTP
LOCKHAPT, WTP
LQCKHART, HTP
SAN ANTONIO, CEDAR RUN,A.C.
SAN ANTONIO, NELL
WICHITA FALLS
CHARLOTTTSVILLE
CHESAPEAKE, GREAT BRIDGE
CHESAPEAKE, GREAT BRIDGE
CHESAPEAKE, GREAT BRIDGE, HTTDR.
CHESAPEAKE, NORFOLK
CHFSAPEAKF, NORFOLK
CHESAPEAKE, NORFOLK
CHESAPEAKE, NORFOLK
CHESAPEAKE, NORFOLK, HYDP.
CHESAPEAKE, PORTSMOUTH
CHESAPEAKE, PORTSMOUTH
CHESAPEAKE, PORTSMOUTH
CHESAPEAKE, PORTSMOUTH
CHESAPEAKE, PORTSMOUTH
CHESAPEAKE, PORTSMOUTH, HYDR,
RESTON
ST. CROIX, CISTERN
ST. CROIX, CISTERN
ST. CROIX, CISTERN
ST. CPOIX, CISTERN
BATTLCBORO
CRYSTAL SPRINGS
ID
35438
35439
35437
26189
32913
32992
40709
76188
32914
32993
40708
26187
3291S
32994
40707
41899
4)900
37398
17721
32318
32313
32317
32306
32309
32308
32307
32316
32314
32315
32312
29902
32311
323H
16141
39773
39774
39786
39787
TYPE
F
D
F
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
F
F
r
r
0
r
T
F
r
D
F
D
D
D
D
F
F
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
SOU
M
M
M
M
8
W
s
s
8
S
S
s
c
c
c
c
MILES DATE AMPHIBOLE
A-C PIPE COLLECTED MFL
PAGE 40
CHRYSOTILE BLANK MET LAB
MFL MFL
REF
35438
35439
35437
26189
32913
32992
40709
76188
32914
32993
40708
26187
3291S
32994
40707
41899
41900
37398
F
D
F
D
D
D
D
D M
D
D
D
D M
F
F
r
F M
D
F M
r a
5.00
0,00
0,00
3.00
3.00
3,00
3.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
o.op
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.70
0.00
0,00
07/00/73
04/22/76
04/22/76
04/22/76
06/17/75
09/03/75
11/11/75
02/18/76
06/17/75
09/03/75
11/11/75
02/18/76
06/17/75
09/01/75
11/11/75
02/18/76
11/01/78
11/01/78
01/12/77
R
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
R
B
B
B
B
B
B
0.040
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.010
0,010
0.020
0.010
0,010
0,010
0.010
0.010
0,010
0,010
0.010
0,010
o.oio
0,010
0.020
B
B
B
N
B
N
N
N
B
B
B
B
8
N
N
B
B
0,010
0.010
0.010
0,050
0.130
0.020
0,050
0,050
0.050
0.010
0,010
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.020
0.040
0,010
0.020
N
N
N
B
B
N
0.020
0.020
0,020
0.010
0.010
0.060
B
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
N
N
M
UCB
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
E.PC
AL
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
0.00
10/09/74 B
01/04/79 N
02/13/79 N
01/04/79 B
01/04/79 B
02/13/79 B
02/13/79 N
02/13/79 B
01/04/79 B
01/04/79 N
01/04/79
02/13/79 B
02/13/79 B
02/31/79 N
01/04/79
11/08/76 B
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
1
0
,020
.300
,060
,400
.050
.400
.600
.050
,050
.500
,800
,010
N
B
N
B
B
B
B
N
N
B
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
160.
U.
138.
0.
0,,
0.
23.
0.
070
230
050
830
060
080
050
000
100
000
050
300
500
000
010
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
,070
.050
,050
.050
.070
.070
.070
M
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
M
EPC
EPC
EPC
iPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
EPC
AA
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
0.00 06/21/78 B
0,00 06/21/78 N
0.00 08/31/78 B 2.000
0,00 08/31/78 B 4.000
03/12/74 B
03/12/74 B
0.020
0,020
543,000
15.000
237.000
427.000
0,100
0.100
N EPC
N EPC
N EPC
N EPC
M EPC
M EPC
AB
AB
AB
AB
AA
AA
(TYPE) F«FINISHED AT SOURCE DZDISTPIBUTION RIP.AW ESPLANT DISCHARGE EFFLUENT
(SOURCE) 3«SURFACE, N*MELL, C=C1STERN, B=COMBINED
(B/N) B«BCl.0W DETECTION LIMIT NsNOT STATISTIC ALLY SIGNIFICANT
(METHOD!) «*MILLIPOPE COND, WASH,, NBNUCLEPOHE JAFFE, D»DPOP, L=MILLIPOHE JAFFE-WICK, B«DOUBLE NUCLEPORE FILTER
(LAB) EPC»EPA, CINCINNATI FPOsEPA, DULUTH EPG*EPA, ATHENS, GA MCCxMCCPONE ASSOCIATES, UIL=UNlV£RSlTY OF ILLINOIS, DQW»
DOW CHEMICAL, MIDLAND, MT., UCfliU. OF CALIF., BERKELEY, WISsWISC. DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES, UWA*U, WASH., SEATTLE, MSS« Ml.
SINAI HOSP., NE* YORK, NMI«NEW MEXICO INST, OF MINING, CMCsCITY OF CHICAGO WA7EP PURIFICATION LABORATORY, MDH»MINN, DEPT, OF HEALT
UMD»UN1V, OF MINN,, DULUTH
-------
00
CM
06-22-79
STATE CITK
VT C. NOSBURG
VT EDEN, SPRING
VT JERICHO-UNDERHILL
VT NORTH TROY
VT NORTH TROY
VT OUARPY HILL
VT RICHMOND-HARRINGTON
MA ABFROEEN
HA ANACORTES
MA BREMERTON
MA EVERETT
MA EVERETT
HA EVERETT
MA EVERETT
MA EVERETT
WA EVERETT, L, CHAPLIN
MA EVERETT, SPADA LAKE
WA HOOUIAM
MA LEVINWORTH
MA LVNOEN
MA LINDEN
MA OLYMPIA
MA SEATTLE, CEDAR
MA SEATTLE, CEDAR
MA SEATTLE, CEDAR, A/C
MA SEATTLE, CEDAR, A/C
WA SEATTLE, CEDAR, A/C
MA SEATTLE, CEDAR, A/C
WA SEATTLr, CEDAR, A/C
WA SEATTLE, CEDAR, A/C
WA SEATTLE, CEDAR, A/C
WA SEATTLE, CEDAR, A/C
WA SEATTLE. CEDAR, CONTROL WKS
WA SEATTLE, CEDAR, CONTROL WKS
HA SEATTLr, CEDAR, CONTROL WKS
WA SEATTLE? CEDAR. CONTROL WKS
WA SEATTLE, TOLT
WA SEATTLE, TOLT
WA SEATTLE, TOLT
WA SEATTLE, TOLT
WA SEATTLE, TOLT
WA SEATTLE, TOLT
WA SEATTLE, TOLT
HA SEATTLE, TOLT
HA SEATTLE, TOLT
PAGE 41
ID TYPE SOURCE MILES DATE AMPHIBOLE CHRVSOT1LE BLANK MET LAB
A-C PIPE COLLECTED MFL MFL MFL
REf
26021
26060
26061
26062
26063
26030
37378
31294
26048
26025
26024
26038
26037
26041
26040
26093
26052
36023
26016
260)9
26051
13091
13092
13092
3-R
4C-R
5C-R
0,
0.
o.
0.
0.
0.
0.
6.
1.
6.
1.
6.
1.
6.
1.
0,
0.
o.
0.
0.
0.
0.
00
00
00
00
7
T
00
00
00
08
15
08
IS
08
15
08
)5
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
03/12/74
03/14/74
03/12/74
03/12/74
03/12/74
03/14/74
05/27/75
03/00/76
03/00/76
03/00/76
03/00/76
05/19/75
05/19/75
01/13/77
10/28/75
05/27/75
05/27/75
08/26/75
08/26/75
09/30/75
09/30/75
11/18/75
11/18/75
05/27/75
08/26/75
09/30/75
11/18/75
01/31/75
01/31/75
01/31/75
09/08/75
09/08/75
09/08/75
01/24/77
02/02/77
02/08/77
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
8
B
B
B
N
N
B
B
B
B
N
N
N
B
N
B
B
0.
0.
0.
o,
0.
0.
0.
o.
2.
4.
1.
20.
20.
25.
25.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
o.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
1.
2.
t.
0.
0.
5.
3.
3.
020
020
020
070
070
020
020
020
120
680
700
700
000
900
200
330
160
060
010
020
100
400
200
100
100
100
100
140
100
too
100
100
100
800
200
100
900
200
200
700
300
100
N
N
N
N
N
B
B
B
N
N
N
B
N
N
N
N
B
N
B
B
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
35
143
71
110
140
167
218
1
4
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
3
2
1
0
0
8
5
16
.070
.080
.070
,200
.980
.070
.070
.020
.900
.000
,600
.000
.000
.600
.900
.510
.100
.010 B
.010
,700
.600
.100
.900
.100
.600
.400
.300
,200
.200
.100
.100
.100
.500
.600
.000
.900
.200
.200
.900
,100
.400
0.010
M EPC
M EPC
M EPC
M EPC
M EPC
M EPC
M EPC
« EPC
M UNA
M UWA
M DMA
M EPC
M EPC
M EPC
M EPC
M EPC
M UCB
M EPC
M EPC
M EPC
M EPC
M EPC
M ifC
M EPC
M EPC
M EPC
M EPC
M EPC
M EPC
M EPC
M EPC
M EPC
M EPC
M EPC
M EPC
M UCB
M MCC
M MCC
M UMA
M UNA
M UWA
AA
AA
AA
AA
AA
AA
AA
AB
AH
AM
AM
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AA
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AA
AB
AB
AC
AC
AC
AP
AP
AP
(TYPO r«FIMI8HGD AT SOURCE D»DISTRIBUTION RaRAW EePLANT DISCHARGE EFFLUENT
(SOURCE)' S«SURFACE, HaWELL. CaCISTFPN, B=COMB1NED
(B/N) BaBELOW DETECTION LIMIT NaNOT STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT
(METHODI) *«HILLIPORE COND. WASH., N»NUCLEPORE JAFFD, D«DROP, L=MILLIPORE JAFFE-WKK, B«DOUBLE NUCLEPORE FILTER
(LAB) EPC«CPA, CINCINNATI EPOaEPA, DULUTH EPGeEPA, ATHENS, GA MCC=MCCRONE ASSOCIATES, UIL=UNIVKRSITY OF ILLINOIS, DOW«
DOM CHEMICAL, MIDLAND, MI., UCRaU. OF CALIF., BERKELEY, WISsWISC. DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES, U«IAaU. WASH., SEATTLE, MSS* MT.
SINAI HOSP., NEW YORK, NMIsNEW MEXICO INfiT. 0> MINING, CMC»CITY OF CHICAGO WATEf PURIFICATION LABORATORY, MUHSMINN, DEPT, OF HEALT
UMD«UNIV. OF MINN., DULUTH
-------
oo
06-22
STATE
WA
MA
MA
WA
WA
MA
WA
WA
WA
WA
MA
MA
WA
MA
MA
MA
MA
MA
WA
WA
WA
MA
MA
MA
MA
WA
MI
HI
WI
WI
MI
MI
WI
WI
Ml
WI
Ml
WI
Ml
WI
MI
WI
WI
WI
HI
-79
CITY
SEATTLE, TOLT
SEATTLE. TOLT
SEATTLE, TOLT
SEATTLE. TOLT
SEATTLE. TOLT
SEATTLE. TOLT
SEATTLE, TOLT
SEATTLE. TOLT
SEATTLE, TOLT
SEATTLE, TOLT
SEATTLE, TOLT
SEATTLE, TOLT
SEATTLE, TOLT
SEATTLE, TOLT
SEATTLE, TOLT
SEATTLE, TOLT
SEATTLE, TOLT
SEATTLE, TOLT
SEATTLE, TOLT
SEATTLE, TOLT EAST END
SEATTLE, TOLT WEST END
TACOMA, WELL
TACOMA, WELL
TUMWATEP
YAKIMA, CITY
YAKIMA, NOBHILL WELL
APPLETON
APPLETON
ASHLAND
ASHLAND
ASHLAND
ASHLAND, L, SUPERIOR
ASHLAND, L. SUPERIOR
ASHLAND, L. SUPERIOR
ASHLAND, L. SUPERIOR
ASHLAND, L. SUPERIOR
ASHLAND, L. SUPERIOR
ASHLAND, L. SUPERIOR
ASHLAND, L. SUPERIOR
ASHLAND, L, SUPERIOR
ASHLAND, L. SUPERIOR
ASHLAND, L. SUPERIOR
CLOQUET, L. SUPERIOR
CLOOUET, L. SUPERIOR
CLOQUET, L. SUPERIOR
ID TYPE SOURCE
MILES DATE AMPHI80LE
A-C PIPE COLLECTED MFL
PAGE 42
CHRYSOTILE BLANK MET LAB
MFL MFL
REE
6-R
11-R
12D-P
21-R
24-R
29-R
33-P
44-R
51-R
53-R
62-R
70-R
89. R
93-R
108-R
111-R
120-R
135-R
161 -R
26017
26017
37380
37308
37803
37358
r
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
R
R
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
F
R
R
R
R
M
S
tt
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Q
,00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
,00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
,00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
,00
02/17/77
02/23/77
02/28/77
03/24/77
04/11/77
04/20/77
05/05/77
05/17/77
06/01/77
06/08/77
06/28/77
07/12/77
09/03/77
10/05/77
11/07/77
11/16/77
01/11/78
02/14/78
06/08/78
02/27/75
02/06/75
05/15/75
05/15/75
01/13/77
01/13/77
01/17/77
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
3
4
1
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
.500
.300
.800
.200
.400
.900
.600
,900
,700
,200
.200
.120
.020
,070
,010
.050
,010
13
13
13
25
9
4
3
2
8
3
2
2
1
3
3
4
5
3
2
1
1
B 0
B 0
N 0
N 0
N 0
.000
.300
.100
.800
.400
,300
.800
.800
.400
,600
.500
.800
,200
.600
.600
.600
.400
,900
.000
.200
,700
.020
,020
,060 P
,200
.050 N
F
F
F
F
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
F
R
R
R
R
8
S
S
S
S
S
&
S
8
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0,00
0,00
0.00
0.00
0.00
o.oo
0.00
0,00
0.00
09/19/75
11/22/77
07/00/73
09/19/75
09/19/75
08/22/73
09/06/73
09/14/73
09/26/73
10/03/73
10/10/73
10/17/73
10/24/73
11/14/73
03/24/74
03/24/75
08/22/73
08/29/73
09/26/73
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
0.340
0.400 B 0.400 B
0.040
0.380
0.380
0.190
0.250
0.620
1.630
0.060
1.900
0.700
1.800
0.800
0.800
0.010
0.010
0.400
M UWA
H UWA
M UWA
M UWA
M UWA
M UWA
M UWA
« UWA
M UWA
M UWA
M UWA
M UhA
M UWA
M UMA
M UWA
M UWA
M UWA
M UWA
M UWA
M EPC
M EPC
M UCB
M EPC
M EPC
M EPC
M EPC
B WIS
M EPC
B UCB
B WIS
B MS
M MCC
C OKF
C OFF
M MCC
M MCC
C OKf
M MCC
M MCC
M MCC
N MS
N MIS
H MCC
M KCC
M MCC
AP
AP
AP
AP
AP
AP
AP
AP
AP
AP
AP
AP
AP
AP
AP
AP
AP
AP
AP
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AV
AB
AL
AV
AV
AX
AX
AX
AX
AX
AX
AX
AX
AX
AF
AF
AX
AX
AX
(TYPE) F«rm5HED AT SOURCE D«DISTRIBUTION RsRAW E«PLANT DISCHARGE EFFLUENT
(SOURCE) S«SURFACE, W«WELL, C»C1STFRN, B=COMBINED
(B/N) B»BELOW DETECTION LIMIT NsNOl STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT
(METHODl) W»«ILLIPORE COND. WASH., NBNUCLEPUKE JAFFE, DsDPOP, L=MJLLIPORE JAFFE-WICK, BsDOUBLE NUCLEPORE FILTER
(LAB) EPC«EPA, CINCINNATI EPD*EPA, DULU1H EPGaEPA, ATHENS, GA MCC=MCCRONE ASSOCIATES, UILsUNIVEPSITY OF ILLINOIS, DOW»
DOW CHEMICAL, MIDLAND, MI., UCBaU. OF CALIF., BERKELEY, WISeWJSC. DEPT, OF NATURAL RESOURCES, UMArU. MASH., SEATTLE, HS8« MT.
SINAI HOSP,, NEW YORK, NMIsNEW MEXICO INST, 0* MINING, CfC=CITY OF CHICAGO WATER PURIFICATION LAaOHA'faPV, MDHzMINN, DEPT, OF HEALT
UMDnUNIV, OF MINN., DULUTH
-------
oo
on
PAGE 43
ID TYPE SOURCE MILES DATE AMPHIBOLE CHRYSOTILE BLANK MET LAB
A-C PIPE COLLECTED MFL MFL MFL
0,010
0.010
PEF
06-22-79
STATE CITY
WI CLOOUET, L. SUPERIOR
MI CLOQUET, L. SUPERIOR
MI CLOOUET, L, SUPERIOR
MI CLOOUET, L. SUPERIOR
MI DE PERE
MI EAU CLAIPE
WI FOND DU LAC
WI FOND DU LAC, RESERVOIR
WI FOND DU LAC, HELL
WI KAUKAUNA
WI LA CROSSIT
WI LITTLE CHUTE
WI MANITOWOC
wi MARINETTE
wi MENASHA
MI NEENAH
WI NEOPIT
Ml NEW LONDON
WI NO, rOND DO LAC WELL 3
WI NO, FOND DU LAC, WELL 2
MI PLATTEVILLE
WI PORT EDWARDS
Ml SHEBOYGAN
WI STURGEON BAY
V»t SUPERIOR
41 SUPERIOR
WI SUPERIOR
WI SUPERIOR
WI SUPERIOR
WI SUPERIOR
WI SUPERIOR
WI SUPERIOR, PEEP WELLS
WI SUPERIOR, DEEP WELLS
WI SUPERIOR, DEEP WELLS
MI SUPERIOR, DEEP WELLS
WI SUPERIOR, DEEP WELLS
MI SUPERIOR, DEEP MELLS
WI SUPERIOR, L. SUPERIOR
WI SUPERIOR, L, SUPERIOR
WI SUPERIOR, L. SUPERIOR
WI SUPERIOR, L, SUPERIOR
WI TWO RIVERS
WI UNION CENTER
WV HUNTINGTON
WV WHEELING
(TYPE) F«FI»ISHCD AT SOURCE DeDISTPIBUTION R»PA« E*PLAM DISCHARGE EFFLUENT
(SOURCE) S«SURFACE, HaHCLL, C'CISTERN, B»COMB1NED
(B/N) B'BELOM DETECTION LIMIT N»NOT STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT
(METHODI) M»MILLIPOPE COND, WASH,, NBNUCLEPOHE JAFFE, D=DROP, LSMILLIPOPE JAFFE-WICK, B=DOUBLF, NUCLEPORE FILTER
(LAB) EPCaEPA, CINCINNATI EPD«EPA, DULUTH EPG«EPA, ATHENS, GA MCC=MCCRONE ASSOCIATES, UILsUNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS, DOW"
DOW CHEMICAL, MIDLAND, MI., UCB«U. Of CAMF., BERKELEY, WIS = WISC. OF.PT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES, UWA = U. HASH., SEATTLE, »SS» Ml,
SINAI HOSP,, NEW YOBK, NMI*NE* MEXICO INST. Ot MINING, C*C=CITY OF CHICAGO WAT6.K PIJPIFICATION LARORATUBY. MDM = MINN, DEPT, OF HEALT
UMD«UNIV, OF MINN,, DULUTH
37822
37361
37362
37357
37817
37353
37352
37360
37359
1630
37301
R
R
R
R
F
F
F
F
F
F
r
F
F
r
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
r
F
r
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
S
S
S
S
W
M
W
W
W
W
W
W
S
S
S
S
S
M
W
H
W
S
S
W
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
W
N
H
W
W
H
S
M
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0,00
0,00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0,00
0,00
0.10
0.00
10/10/73 B
10/17/73
10/24/73
10/03/7B
09/22/75 B
12/08/77 B
09/18/75 B
11/22/77 B
11/22/77 B
11/22/77 B
12/06/77 B
11/19/77 B
09/08/75 B
09/17/75 B
09/19/75 N
09/19/75 8
09/23/75 B
11/19/77 B
11/22/77 B
11/22/77 B
08/24/75 N
09/18/75 B
09/17/75 B
09/22/75 N
<12/00/74
09/03/75 B
10/02/75 N
11/11/75 N
12/01/75 N
01/05/76 N
02/03/76 N
08/22/73 B
08/29/73 B
09/26/73
10/03/73 B
10/24/73
11/14/73 B
03/20/74 N
04/01/74
04/08/74
04/15/74
09/08/75 B
09/19/75 B
08/05/77 B
10/21/76 B
0.900
1.100
1.800
0,010 B
0.020 B
0.020 M
0.010 N
0.010 B
0,050 B
0,006
0,010 B
0,050 B
0,020
0,030
0,010
4.000
0.006
0,010
0.030
0.010
0.020
0,100
0,080
0.200
2.800
4,000
2.400
0,060
0.020 N
0,230
0.010 B
0.890
0,020
0. 100
0.050
0,010
0.050 B
o.uo
0.580
0.140
0.170
0.130
0.010
0.050
0.400
0.250
0.900
0.380
0.240
1.400
0.630
0.420
0.960
0,590
0.390
0.260
0,410
0.400
0.100
M MCC
M MCC
M MCC
M MCC
B MIS
M EPC
B MIS
M EPC
M EPC
M EPC
M EPC
M EPC
B "IS
8 MIS
B WIS
B MIS
B Mis
M EPC
M EPC
M EPC
B MIS
B MIS
B MIS
B MIS
P MSS
B MIS
B MIS
B MIS
B MIS
B MIS
B MIS
M MCC
M MCC
M MCC
M MCC
M MCC
M MCC
N MIS
N WIS
N MIS
N MIS
B MIS
B MIS
M EPC
M EPC
AX
AX
AX
AX
AV
AB
AV
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AV
AV
AV
AV
AV
AB
AB
AB
AV
AV
AV
AV
AC
AV
AV
AV
AV
AV
AV
AX
AX
AX
AX
AX
AX
AF
AF
AF
AF
AV
AV
AB
AB
-------
06-27-79 PAGE 44
STATE CITY ID TYPE SOURCE MILES DATE AMPHIBOLE CHRYSOTILE BLANK MET LAB REF
A-C PIPE COLLECTED KFL MFL NFL
WY CHEYENE 12519 F 0.00 07/00/74 N 0.070 0.100 M EPC AA
WY CHEtENE 12519 F 0.00 07/00/74 N 0,070 1.200 M EFC AA
OO
0\
(TYPE) F«ri»I8HED AT SOURCE D«DISTPI9UTION RsRAW E=PLANT DISCHARGE EFFLUENT
(SOURCE) SmSUWACE. W»»ELL, C'CISTERN, BsCOMBINED
(B/N) B»BCLOW DETECTION LIMIT NaNOT STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT
(METHOD!) H-MILLIPORE COND. WASH., N«NUCLI.POPE JAFFE, DBDROP, L«MILLIPDRE JAFFE-WICK, B=OOUBLE NUCLEPOPE FILTER
(LAB) BPC'CPA, CINCINNATI EPD«EPA, DULUTH EPGaEPA, ATHENS, GA MCC=MCCRONE ASSOCIATES, UIL*UN1VERSITY OF ILLINOIS, DOW«
DOW CHEMICAL, MIDLAND, MI., UCB.U. OF CALIF,, BERKELEY, WIS*WISC. DF.PT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES, U*A = U. WASH., SEATTLE, «SS« HI.
SINAI HOSP., MEH YORK, NMIrNEW MEXICO INST. Ot MINING, CMC=CITY OF CHICAGO hATER PURIFICATION LABORATORY, MDH=MINN. DEPT. OF HEALT
UMDBUNIV. OF MINN., DULUTH
-------
TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
(Please read Instructions on the reverse before completing)
1. REPORT NO.
EEA-600/1-79-028
3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION NO.
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
EXPOSURE TO ASBESTOS FROM DRINKING WATER IN THE
UNITED STATES
5. REPORT DATE
August 1979 issuing date
6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
7'AJTam°eRsS)R. Millette, Patrick J. Clark, Michael F,
Pansing
8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
In-house
10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
614B(d)
11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
Health Effects Research Laboratory-Cincinnati, Ohio
Office of Research and Development
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
Cincinnati, Ohio 45268
13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
Final 9/1/77-2/1/79
14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
EPA/600/10
15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
16. ABSTRACT
Over 1500 asbestos analyses of water supplies in 43 states, Puerto Rico
and the District of Columbia were evaluated in order to assess the exposure of
the United States population to asbestos in drinking water. It was concluded
that the large majority of U.S. water consumers are not exposed to concentra-
tions of asbestos fibers above one million fibers per liter. In a few areas
people are exposed to concentrations up to one hundred million fibers per
liter. The majority of persons receiving water from asbestos-cement pipe
distribution systems are not exposed to significant number of fibers from the
pipe. In areas of aggressive water, however, water consumers using asbestos-
cement mains may be exposed to high concentrations of fibers.
This report presents data on the exposure to waterborne asbestos fibers.
Other projects are currently assessing the health effects of ingested asbestos
and will be described in later reports.
A listing of a computerized waterborne asbestos data base is included as
an Appendix.
17.
KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
DESCRIPTORS
b.lDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS
c. COS AT I Field/Group
Asbestos, Serpentine, Potable water
Health Effects
06F
18. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
Release to Public
19. SECURIT^ CLASS (ThisReport)
. Unclassified ,:
21. NO. OF PAGES
95
20. SECURITY CLASS {Thispage)
22. PRICE
Unclassified
EPA Form 2220-1 (Rev. 4-77)
PREVIOUS EDITION is OBSOLETE
87
US GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1979 -657-060/5379
------- |