EPA-230/1-74-04G
AUGUST 1974
           ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

                    OF
                                      i
      PROPOSED EFFLUENT GUIDELINES


 THE  RUBBER  PROCESSING INDUSTRY

               (PHASE II)
                  QUANTITY
      U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

          Office of Planning and Evaluation

             Washington, D.C. 20460
                       u)
                       O

-------
  This document is available in limited quantities through the
U. S. Environmental  Protection Agency, Information Center,
Room W-327 Waterside Mall, Washington, D. C. 20460.
  The document will subsequently be available through the
National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia
22151.

-------
          ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
                  OF
    PROPOSED EFFLUENT GUIDELINES
   THE RUBBER PROCESSING INDUSTRY
               (PHASE II)
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
       Office of Planning and Evaluation
          Washington, D.C. 20460
            EPA-230/1 -74-046
               August 1974
                    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                    Region V, Library
                    230 South Dearborn Street
                    Chicago, Illinois   60604

-------
This report has been reviewed by the Office
of  Planning  and  Evaluation,  EPA,  and
approved for publication. Approval does not
signify that the contents necessarily reflect
the views and policies of the Environmental
Protection Agency, nor does mention of trade
names or  commercial  products  constitute
endorsement or recommendation for use.

-------
                                     PREFACE

     The attached document is a contractors' study prepared for the Office of Planning and
Evaluation of the Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA"). The purpose of the study is
to analyze the economic impact which  could  result  from the application of  alternative
effluent limitation guidelines and standards of performance to be established under Sections
304(b) and 306 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended.

     The study supplements the technical study ("EPA Development Document") support-
ing the issuance of proposed regulations under Sections 304(b) and 306. The Development
Document surveys existing and potential waste treatment control methods and technology
within particular industrial source  categories and  supports  proposal of certain effluent
limitation guidelines and standards of performance based upon an analysis of the feasibility
of these  guidelines and standards in accordance with the requirements of Sections 304(b)
and  306 of the Act. Presented  in  the Development  Document  are the investment and
operating costs associated with various alternative control and treatment technologies. The
attached  document supplements  this analysis by estimating the broader economic effects
which might result from the required application of various control methods and  tech-
nologies.  This  study  investigates  the effect of alternative  approaches in terms of product
price increases, effects upon employment and  the  continued  viability  of affected plants,
effects upon foreign trade and other competitive effects.

     The study has been prepared with the supervision  and review of the Office of Planning
and  Evaluation of EPA. This report was  submitted in fulfillment of Task Order No. 16,
Contract 68-01-1541 by Arthur D. Little, Inc. Work was completed as of August 1974.

     This report is being  released  and  circulated at approximately  the same time as
publication  in  the Federal  Register of  a notice  of proposed  rule making  under Sec-
tions 304(b) and 306 of the Act  for the subject point source category. The study is not an
official EPA publication. It will be considered along with the information contained in the
Development Document  and any comments received by EPA on either document before or
during proposed rule making  proceedings necessary to establish final regulations. Prior to
final promulgation of regulations, the accompanying study shall have standing in any EPA
proceeding or  court  proceeding  only  to  the extent  that  it represents the views of the
contractor who studied the subject industry. It  cannot  be cited, referenced, or represented
in any respect  in any such proceeding as a statement of EPA's views regarding the subject
industry.

-------
                    TABLE OF CONTENTS

                                                     Page

List of Tables                                             v

   I.  EXECUTIVE SUMMARY                                1

  II.  DESCRIPTION OF RUBBER PROCESSING INDUSTRY          9

 III.  DESCRIPTION OF RUBBER PROCESSING INDUSTRY
     SEGMENTS SIC 3021 - RUBBER FOOTWEAR               11

 IV.  SIC 3031 - RECLAIMED RUBBER                        21

  V.  SIC 3041 - RUBBER HOSE AND BELTING                 27

 VI.  SIC 3069-FABRICATED RUBBER PRODUCTS              33

VII.  SIC 3293 - GASKETS PACKING SEALING DEVICES -
     COMPOSITIONS ONLY                                39

VIII.  SIC 7534 - RETREAD TIRES                           43

 IX.  ECONOMIC IMPACT ANALYSIS                         47

     APPENDIX                                         A-1
                          111

-------
                           LIST OF TABLES




Table No.                                                          Page




   1-1    The Rubber Processing Industry SIC Code 3021                 4




   I-2    The Rubber Processing Industry SIC Code 3031                  5




   I-3    The Rubber Processing Industry SIC Code 3041                  6




   I-4    The Rubber Processing Industry SIC Code 3069                  7




   I-5    The Rubber Processing Industry SIC Code 3293                  8




  11-1    Tire Products Vs. Non-Tire Products                           10




  11-2    Rubber Usage                                              10




  II-3    Value of Shipments of SIC Categories, 1972                     10




 111-1    Rubber Footwear Companies and Plants                        12




 III-2    Plant and Company Size                                     18




 III-3    Company Diversification                                     19




 111 -4    Footwear Sales                                             19




 111-5    Rubber Footwear Value of Shipments                          20




 IV-1    Financial Trends                                            22




 IV-2    Average Production by Company                              23




 IV-3    Consumption of Reclaim Rubber                              24




 IV-4    Reclaim Consumption by Product                             24




  V-1    Hose and Belting Plants                                       28




  V-2    Sales by Company                                           30




  V-3    Industrial Products                                          31

-------
                       LIST OF TABLES (Continued)

Table No.

  VI-1    Sales by Company
         Single- and Multi-Plant Companies Ranked within SIC 3069       34

  VI-2   Sales Classification                                           35

  Vi-3   Product Types                                              36

 VI1-1    Single- and Multi-Plant Companies  Ranked within SIC 3293      40

VI11-1    Annual Passenger Output of Retreaders by Volume               44

VIII-2   Annual Truck Output of Retreaders by Volume Brackets          44

VIII-3   Shipments of Tread Rubber (Camelback)                        45

VIII-4   Rubber Usage by Tire Type                                   45

VIII-5   Number of Tires Retreaded in 1972                            46

VI11-6   Retread Tire Prices                                           46

  IX-1    Pollution Control Costs - Category A Plants                    48

  IX-2   Minimum-Sized Plants with Required Capital                    49

  IX-3   B.P.T. Costs                                                50

  IX-4   B.P.T. Costs                                                51

  IX-5   Total Number of Plants used in Calculations                     53

  IX-6   Price Effects                                                54

  IX-7   Analysis of Selected Companies                               55
                                  VI

-------
                                    SECTION I

                              EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

     This final report is submitted in compliance with Part III of Contract No. 68-01-1541
with the Environmental Protection Agency on the Economic Impact of Water Pollution
Control of the Rubber Processing Industry.  Using the effluent guidelines development
document as prepared by Roy  F. Weston, Incorporated, and  supplied to us by EPA, we
evaluated the economic impact  of pollution control costs on the  Rubber Footwear (SIC
3021), Rubber  Reclaim (SIC 3031),  Hose and Belting (SIC 3041), Rubber Products Not
Elsewhere Classified (SIC 3069), Gaskets Packing  and Sealing  Devices (SIC 3293), and
Retread Tires (SIC 7534) industries.

                                   Methodology

     In determining the effects  of pollution control on the industry, the costs that would
likely be incurred were estimated from the effluent guidelines document  and information
received from industry. Conclusions were drawn  from an analysis of  the way these costs
would  affect  prices, production, employment, profits, and other economic variables. The
analysis was based on coverage of facilities of various sizes that represent about one third of
the industry.

     The Contractor assumed that companies in extremely competitive  segments  of the
industry (Footwear and Reclaimed Rubber) would find it necessary to absorb the increase
in cost, whereas the other segments would pass along the cost in the form of higher prices to
maintain their current profit margins. However, so large  a percentage of the industry is on
municipal systems that there is little potential for price increases. Small companies that are
not on municipal systems, that  have limited capital, and that cannot increase prices were
considered as candidates for closing if the annual  costs for pollution control exceeded 50%
of their Before Tax Earnings.

                                   Segmentation

     The non-tire section of the rubber processing  industry, which is the subject of this
document, has been segmented by product. Each SIC code is considered a separate segment.
Because of the market and price considerations, this characterization has been more useful
and reasonable in considering economic impact. These segments are:

-------
                       Guidelines
                       Document
    SIC Code          Category                        Product

       3021             A                Rubber Footwear
       3031             B and C         Rubber Reclaim
       3041             A                Hose and Belting
       3069             A and D          Rubber Products Not Elsewhere Classified
       3293             A                Gaskets, Packing and Sealing Devices
       7534             None            Retread Tires

                              Financial Considerations
     The rubber industry has always had a lower return on its invested capital than the rest
of industry. The latest information on the 1973 figures shows that all industries enjoyed a
9% return on invested capital, while the rubber industry's amounted to only 7.8%. Profit as
a percent of sales  after taxes for all industries was 4.8%. The figure for the rubber industry
was 4.1%.

     Present indications are  that the consumption relationship between the segments will
remain roughly the same, and there will be no marked changes in rubber usage. In general,
no  substantial  ups  and  downs are anticipated. Financial problems are  currently being
encountered by the retread and reclaim rubber businesses.  The retread business will not be
affected by pollution control, but it still has problems.
     Although the reclaim business suffers from low margins and competition from virgin
rubber,  it will need to spend money  on pollution control. Pollution control  costs could
cause many plants to close. We estimate that three out of a total of eight plants currently in
operation will seriously consider closing because of the added cost of pollution control.

     Since  costs of scrap collection keep  increasing, the profit squeeze on reclaim rubber
becomes increasingly tighter. Many companies have already gone out of business; during the
1970's the additional cost of the pollution  controls could well cause others to go out of
business.

     The rubber footwear segment  of the industry has been seriously affected by foreign
competitors.  Small companies (less  than $2  million  sales)  that do not discharge  into
municipal sewers would need to increase their sales prices as much as 4%. They state  that
this will place them in a poor competitive position.

     This analysis indicates no  adverse effects on the growth of the industry because of
B.P.T., B.A.T., and N.S.P.S. In addition, the costs should not affect supply.

-------
     The Contractor does not expect these additional costs to exert a significant impact on
the market for and prices of the respective products. The plants that will close are chiefly
small plants that already operate at a low profit margin because of a difficult competitive
situation. Many plants, however, discharge into municipal systems that will not be affected.

     The Contractor estimates that 22 plants will close, or about 1.5 percent of the total in
the rubber processing industry. The impact on each segment is summarized below. More
detailed information is presented in Tables 1-1 through 1-5.

     SIC Code                  Want Closings   Number of People  Effect on Supply

     3021 Footwear                   3             220             None
     3031 Reclaim                    3             250             High
     3041 Hose and
      Belting                         0               0             None
     3069 Fabricated
      Products                       12             600             Small
     3293 Gaskets and
      Sealing                        _4             200             None

     Totals                          22_          1.270


                                    Limitations

     When interpreting the findings of this study, one must be cognizant of the limitations
of the cost data used for calculating  investment  and annual operating costs. First, the
Contractor has  defined these as direct incremental  investment and annual operating costs
required to achieve environmental  standards.  Since  these costs  were provided to the
Contractor by the effluent guidelines development document, the Contractor cannot verify
their accuracy. Second,  comments from industry  indicate some  of  these costs require
further review, but such a review is not within the scope of this phase of the study. Third,
tentative data on  B.A.T. guideline costs for hose plants made by the lead process is included
but not finalized. The tentative guidelines are given  in Appendix A.  Finally, the calculated
price increases for pollution guidelines (B.A.T. and B.P.T.) are probably maximum expected
increases. Certain companies and certain plants meet B.A.T. guidelines (or are on municipal
systems) and may not increase their prices at all. Other  companies may be constrained  to
follow suit.

-------
                      TABLE 1-1

         THE RUBBER PROCESSING INDUSTRY
                    SIC CODE 3021
                       Footwear

Impacts                                B.P.T.       B.A.T.

  Costs
     Investment
       Total for Segment  ($)          1.41 x 106       NA
       Per plant (average)  ($}         156,000         NA
       Percent of average annual      NA
        investment in segment

  Annual
     Total for segment ($)             0.585 x 106
     Per plant average ($)             65,000          NA
     Percent of sales                  0-7.14           NA

  Price increase— Percent             None            NA
     (Varies from product to product)

  Plant closings                     3               NA
     Percent of total  in segment        4.3             NA

  Displaced workers                  220
     Percent of total  in segment        0.7             NA

  Number of community impacts      None            NA
  Impact on industry growth          None            NA
  Direct balance of payment effects    None            NA
  Total plants in Segment             70              NA
  Total plants not on municipal        9               NA

-------
                     TABLE 1-2

       THE RUBBER PROCESSING INDUSTRY
                  SIC CODE 3031
                 Reclaimed Rubber
                                    B.P.T.       B.A.T.
   Investment
     Total for Segment ($)          921 x 103        NA
     Per plant (average) ($)         230 x 103        NA
     Percent of average annual       NA             NA
      investment in segment

Annual
   Total for segment ($)            379.8 x 103      NA
   Per plant average ($)             95,000          NA
   Percent of sales                  0-3.5            NA

Price increase — Percent            None            NA
   (Varies from product to product)

Plant closings                     3               NA
   Percent of total in segment        37.5            NA

Displaced workers                  250             NA
   Percent of total in segment        20.8            NA

Number of community impacts       None            NA
Impact on industry growth          None            NA
Direct balance of payment effects     None            NA
Total plants in Segment             8               NA
Total plants not on municipal        4               NA

-------
                       TABLE 1-3

          THE RUBBER PROCESSING INDUSTRY
                     SIC CODE 3041
                     Hose and Belting

Impacts                                B.P.T.        B.A.T.*

   Costs
     Investment
        Total for Segment ($)          1.250 x 106 **   135,000
        Per plant (average)  ($)          139,000         15,000
        Percent of average annual      NA              NA
         investment in segment

   Annual
     Total for segment ($)             0.495 x 106 **    27,000
     Per plant average ($)             58,000           3,000
     Percent of sales                  0 — 5.8           < .1

   Price increase (Percent)             0.34                  0
     (Varies from product to product)

   Plant closings                      0                     0
     Percent of total in segment       0                     0
   Displaced workers                  0                     0
     Percent of total in segment       0                     0

   Number of community impacts      None                 0
   Impact on industry growth          None                 0
   Direct balance of payment effects    None                 0
   Total plants in Segment             55                   9
   Total plants not on municipal         8                   0
 *Not stipulated exactly at this time, but guidelines are anticipated
  for plants using the lead process for hose manufacture, whether on
  municipal or not.

**lncluding costs of lead elimination ($15,000 investment, $3000
  operating costs each for B.P.T. and B.A.T.)

-------
                       TABLE 1-4

         THE RUBBER PROCESSING INDUSTRY
                    SIC CODE 3069
              Miscellaneous Rubber Products

Impact                                B.P.T.        B.A.T.

  Costs
     Investment
        Total for Segment ($)         14.763 x106      NA
        Per plant (average) ($)         119,000          NA
        Percent of average annual      NA              NA
         investment in segment

  Annual
     Total for segment ($)            5.262 x 106      NA
     Per plant average ($)             42,000           NA
     Percent of sales                 0-4.1           NA

  Price increase                     0.6              NA
     (Varies from product to product)

  Plant closings                     12               NA
     Percent of total in segment          1.0             NA
  Displaced workers                 600
     Percent of total in segment          0.477           NA
  Number of community impacts      None            NA
  Impact on industry growth          None            NA
  Direct balance of payment effects    None            NA
  Total plants in Segment            1189            NA
  Total plants not on municipal          124            NA

-------
                       TABLE 1-5

          THE RUBBER PROCESSING INDUSTRY
                    SIC CODE 3293
                     Gaskets Sealing

Impacts                                B.P.T.       B.A.T.

  Costs

     Investment
       Total for Segment in $         1.664 x 106       NA
       Per plant (average) in $         118,000         NA
       Percent of average annual       NA             NA
        investment in segment

  Annual
     Total for segment in $            707.2 x 103       NA
     Per plant average in $            50,500          NA
     Percent of sales                  0-7.14           NA

  Price increase                      None            NA
     (Varies from product to product)

  Plant closings                      4               NA
     Percent of total in segment        3.0             NA

  Displaced workers                  200             NA
     Percent of total in segment        0.68             NA

  Number of community impacts       None            NA
  Impact on industry growth           None            NA
  Direct balance of payment effects     None            NA
  Total plants in Segment             133             NA
  Total plants not on municipal        14              NA

-------
                                   SECTION II

               DESCRIPTION OF RUBBER PROCESSING INDUSTRY

     The categories of the rubber processing industries covered by this document are:

     Rubber Footwear (SIC 3021)               Rubber Products (SIC 3069)
     Reclaimed Rubber (SIC 3031)              Rubber Gaskets, Packings, and
    Rubber Hose and Belting (SIC 3041)        Sealing Devices (SIC 3293)
                                             Tire Retreading (SIC 7534)

     An economic analysis of proposed effluent guidelines, EPA-230-1-73-024, September,
1973, evaluated the effect of guidelines on the synthetic rubber industry (SIC 2822), and
the tire and tube industry (SIC 3011), which represents the major outlet for rubber. Of the
total new rubber consumed in the  United States, 65% was used by this category (the
production of tire and tire products) and covered in the prior report.

     The remainder, about 35%, was used for non-tire products which are covered in this
document. Table II-1 shows a breakdown of the total new rubber consumption for the years
1970 through 1973.

     The consumption  of rubber by various sections of the industry is shown below. The
tire and related products sector of the rubber processing industry shipped about 250 million
units worth $8-9  billion (6 billion tires and tubes) and consumed about 1,700,000 long
tons of synthetic rubber, and  515,000 long tons of natural rubber.

     The non-tire sector converted  1,056,000 long tons of synthetic rubber, and  190,000
long tons of natural rubber to $5 - 6  billion worth of products.

     The value of shipments for the  SIC codes covered by this report in 1972  is shown in
Table II-3.

     Since the last census  in 1967, the non-tire segment of the industry has grown about
22%, averaging between 4 and 5% per year.

     The products are  described in this document by SIC codes. Because of the variety and
complexity of the products within the fabricated rubber industry, it is necessary to evaluate
the industry size, growth, and financial aspects on the basis of average figures for each
particular segment. Small plants are obviously affected more seriously by the control costs.
However, an estimated  90% are tied into municipal systems.

     The guidelines document separates the industry into four major groupings which relate
to processing  methods  rather than  financial considerations.  These groupings, and  con-
clusions on each, are shown in  the Appendix. The groupings used in the impact analysis use
S.I.C. code groupings because they segregate the industry by products which have similar
financial and marketing considerations.
                                        9

-------
                                        TABLEIM

                         TIRE PRODUCTS VS. NON-TIRE PRODUCTS
                                      (000 Long Tons)
1
Year
1970
1971
1972
1973*
New
Rubber Total
2,477
2,683
2,929
3,150
Tire and
Tire Products
1,578
1,771
1,919
2,075
Non-Tire
Products
899
912
1,010
1,075
% Tire and Tire
Products to Total
64
66
65
66
           'Estimated totals

           Source: Rubber Manufacturers Association, Rubber Industry Business and Economic
                  indicators, 1964 to 1973,

                                       TABLE 11-2
                                    RUBBER USAGE
                               1970


Tire and Tube Products
Mechanical Goods
Footwear
Latex Foam Products*
Wire and Cable
Other
Totals
'Includes carpet backing
Percent

64.0
18.5
6.0
3.5
1.0
7.0
100
not covered in
Long tons
(000)
1,578
458
149
87
25
173
2,477
this study
1971
Percent

66.0
16.5
6.0
3.5
1.0
7.0
Long tons
(000)
1,771
443
160
94
27
188
                 1972
                                                 100
2,683
Percent

65.0
17.5
6.0
3.5
1.0
7.0
100
Long tons
(000)
1,919
513
176
103
29
205
2,929
Sources: Rubber Manufacturers Association, Business and Economic Indicators 1964-1973 arid Rubber Age,
        Jan., 1971-73

                                        TABLE 11-3

                      VALUE OF SHIPMENTS OF SIC CATEGORIES, 1972

               SIC Code                  Products                   $ mill ions

                 3021       Rubber Footwear                            525
                 3031       Rubber Reclaim                              35
                 3041       Hose and Belting                             740
                 3069       Rubber Products Not Elsewhere Classified       3,750
                 3293       Gaskets, Packing and Sealing Devices             150
                 7534       Retread Tires                                66.3
                                           10

-------
                                   SECTION III

          DESCRIPTION OF RUBBER PROCESSING INDUSTRY SEGMENTS
                         SIC 3021 - RUBBER FOOTWEAR

                                   Introduction
    This segment of the industry covers companies that manufacture all-rubber and plastics
footwear, waterproof fabric upper footwear, and other fabric upper footwear having rubber
or plastic soles vulcanized  to the uppers. Our report covers plants that make products of
P.V.C.  as well as of rubber. Both types are  made in many  cases in the same plant and
industry reports do not separate the two.

                                   Technology

    With rubber goods the rubber stocks are mixed in a Banbury mixer or on compounding
rolls (the same as in tire plants), then formed into stock. This stock is then formed onto the
canvas  uppers by screw injection, conventional injection  compression, or transfer molding
techniques.  The  fabric for rainwear products is produced by calendering. In addition, a
certain amount of latex is used as adhesives.

    The technology of manufacture places this product in  Roy Weston's Category A -
general molded, extruded, and fabricated rubber products.

                              Number of Companies

    There are 59 companies in this segment. Of these, about  12 have sales of more than $7
million. Five of  the twelve are  multiplant  companies and account for about 50% of the
dollar value of shipments. Table III-l lists 61% of  the  companies, their plants, value of
shipments, employees and percentage of total value of shipments in this segment.

                                 Number of Plants

    There are 70 plants in this segment ranging in size from 2400 employees to less than
50. (See Table III-l.) Table III-2 lists plants by sales size versus the number of plants.

    Many small plants in  this segment do less than $500,000 worth of business a year.
These small plants as well as the somewhat larger plants which do up to $5 million worth of
business a year operate from rented facilities and use  leased equipment. Rented facilities are
generally in industrial parks and they are tied into municipal  sewage systems.  In most cases
the rubber or polyvinyl chloride that is used in manufacture is purchased and no compound-
ing is done  in the plant. The effluent is only cooling water. Our estimate is that 90% of the
small plants are on municipal systems.

                                        11

-------
Is}
                                                                   TABLE 111-1

                                                   RUBBER FOOTWEAR COMPANIES AND PLANTS
Rank
1

2




3


Name of Company/Location
Uniroyal, Inc.
Naugatuck, Ct
Thomson, NC
Dublin, Ga
Farmville, Va
Total
Converse
Maiden, Ma
Andover, Ma
Bristol, R.I.
Berlin, NH
Presque Isle, Me.
Lumberton, NC
Total
Bata
Belcamp, Md
Salem, Ind.
Elkins, W.Va
Shipment*
In Millions $

63.2
25.0
13.0
5.8
106.0

15.0
5.2
12.0
16.5
14.1
36.2
100.0

21.0
24.9
7.1
% of U.S.

17.67




16.67



                          Total
                                                             53.0
                                                                                     Cum. %    Employees
                                                                                                 3,011
                                                                                                 1,145
                                                                                                   610
                                                                                                   233
                                                                                      17.67
                                                                                      34.34
8.83
43.17
                      4,999
                      1,000
                       350
                       800
                      1,100
                       950
                      2,400
                      6,600
1,200
1,400
  400
3,000
                 *Sales are estimates based on reports from industry and calculations based on number of employees.
                **Plant Size - Large, Medium, Small
Annual
Pounds
Raw Materials
300,000
170.000
31,000
16,000
527,000
29,000
10,150
23,200
31,900
27,550
69,600
191,400
34,800
40,600
11,600
Size*»
L
L
L
L

L
M
L
L
L
L

L
L
M
87,000

-------
                                                TABLE 111-1 (Continued)
Rank   Name of Company/Location
 8     Suave Corporation
       Miami Lakes, Fl.

 9     Endicott Johnson
       Johnson City, NY
                                                                                               Actual
                                           Shipment                                            Pounds
11.0
10.0
1.83        56.17       650
1.67        57.84       550
18,850
15,950
                                                              Size
4

5

6

7

Cambridge Rubber Company
Tarreytown, Md.
Littletown, Pa.
Total
Servus Rubber Company
Rock Island, Illinois
Williamansette, Ma
Total
Lacross
La Crosse, Wise.
Bon An
Auburn, Me

17.8
7.2
25.0

7.2
8.8
16.0

14.0

12.0

1,000
400
4.17 47.34 1,400

400
500
2.67 50.00 900

2.33 52.34 800

2.00 54.34 700

29,000
11,600
40,600

11,600
14,500
26,100

23,200

20,300

M
M

M
M

L

M
M
M

-------
                                               TABLE 111-1 (Continued)
Rank    Name of Company/Location
 10     Randy Manufacturing Corp.
        Randolph, Ma

 11     Gerbo Industries
        Huntington, Pa

 12     Rubber Corp. of Arkansas
        DeQueen, Ark.

 13     Rubber Corp. of Pennsylvania
        West Hazelton, Pa

 14     Ramer Industries. Inc.
        New York, NY

 15     Genesco. Inc.
        Nashville, Tenn.
 16     Allied Hampshire Chemicals
        Saco, Me

 17     Central Slipper Company
        Frier Industries, Inc.
        Wilkes-Barre, Pa
                                                      Annual
 Shipment                                             Pounds
In Millions $    % of U.S.     Cum. %   Employees   Raw Material
    9.0
    9.0
    9.0
    9.0
    9.0
    9.0
    7.0
    7.0
1.50       59.37        500
1.50       60.87        500
1.50       62.37        500
1.50       63.87        500
1.50       65.37       500
1.50       66.87       500
1.17       68.04       400
1.17
69.54       500
                         14,500
                         14,500
                         14,500
                         14,500
                         14,500
                         14,500
                         11,600
11,600
                                                 Size
               M
               M
               M
               M
               M
               M
               M
M

-------
                                               TABLE 111-1 (Continued)
Rank    Name of Company/Location
 18     Quaker Shoe Corporation
        Allentown, Pa

 19     Injection Footwear Corp.
        Miami, Fla.

 20     Alfred Footwear, Inc.
        Limerick, Me
 21     Roberts Shoe Company
        Somersworth, NH
 22     AMFESCO
        Plainview, NY

 23     Daizy Footwear
        Passaic, NJ

 24     Gator Shoe
        Miami, Fla.

 25     Joy Footwear
        Hialeah, Fla.
                                                     Annual
 Shipment                                            Pounds
In Millions $     % of U.S.     Cum. %    Employees    Raw Materials    Size
7.0 1.17 70.71 400
5.0 0.833 71.54 280
4.5 0.75 72.2 245
4.5 0.75 72.2 245
3.75 0.06 73.57 210
2.5 0.04 73.99 140
2.5 0.04 74.40 140
2.5 0.04 74.82 140
11,600 M
8,120 S
7,100 S
7,100 S
6,100 S
4,060 S
4,060 S
4,060 S

-------
                                              TABLE II1-1 (Continued)
Rank   Name of Company/Location
 26    Peerless Footwear
       Telford. Pa

 27    Nohel Mfg. Corporation
       Providence, R.I.
 28    Raton Enterprises, Inc.
       Raton, NM

 29    Qsinski Mfg. Company
       Brooklyn, NY

 30    Carter Rubber Company
       Wilkes Barre, Pa

 31    Alsam Mfg. Company
       Lititz, Pa.

 32    Columbia Novelty Company
       Hazelton, Pa.

 33    Littonian Shoe Company
       Littlestown, Pa.
                                                     Annual
 Shipment                                            Pounds
In Millions $    %of U.S.     Cum. %    Employees    Raw Materials    Size
2.5 0.04 75.25 140
2.5 0.04 75.66 140
2.5 0.04 76.07 140
1.8 0.03 76.37 100
1.8 0.03 76.97 100
1.25 0.02 77.18 70
1.25 0.02 79.18 70
0.8 0.01 80.18 50
4,060
4,060
4,060
3,045
3,045
2,030
2,030
1,420
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S

-------
                                             TABLE II1-1 (Continued)
Rank   Name of Company/Location

 34    Adorn Slipper Company
       New York, NY

 35    Bon Doren Rubber Company
       Anaheim, Cal.
            Totals
          Total Other
                                                    Annual
 Shipment                                           Pounds
In Millions $     % of U.S.     Cum. %    Employees   Raw Materials   Size
    0.6
    0.37

  464.42
  135.58
0.01
0.01


81.18 35
82.18 25
82.18
17.82
1,000
725


          Grand Total
  600.00
100.00

-------
                                    TABLE III-2

                             PLANT AND COMPANY SIZE


A
B
C
D

Sales in Millions
Greater than 50
12 to 50
5 to 12
Under 5
Number of
Companies
3
3
13
17
Number of
Plants
1
13
16
17

Size of Plant*
3
3
2

              Total                   36            47

              Total Estimated 1971 SIC 65
              Industry estimates 70
                         "Category   Pounds Compounded Per Day

                     1      Small     Less than 8200
                     2     Medium    8200-23,000
                     3      Large     Greater than 23,000
                               Rubber Consumption


     PVC and rubber are consumed in footwear manufacture. SBR and natural rubber are
used to the greatest extent and nitrile or neoprene are used where oil resistance is necessary.
Total rubber consumption in 1970 was  148,600 long tons; in  1972, it was  176,700 long
tons.

                                   Profit Range

     The profit range for the shoe industry is low — only  1 to 3% after taxes. The  larger
companies generally have the higher profits.

                               Employees in Segment


     This segment employed about 29,200 (about 24,600 production workers) as of 1971.
Value added per production worker was $12,081.*
'Annual Survey of Manufacturers, 1971.
                                        18

-------
                                    Diversification


     About 40% of companies have sales outside of this segment. The major companies and
their degree of diversification are listed in Table III-3.
                                     TABLE 111-3

                             COMPANY DIVERSIFICATION

                        Company           Percent of Sales In This Segment

                Uniroyal                              6.05
                Suave Shoe Company                   13 .
                Servus Rubber Company                  5.39
                Scoa I ndustries                        21
                Randolph Manufacturing Co.             59
                Genesco                              1
                Carroll Shoe Company                  79
                Pepsico Company                       0.01
                Surft Company                         0.03

                Source:  Industry and Contractor estimates


                                       Markets


     About 250 million pairs of canvas  shoes were sold in the United States in 1972. Of
these, some 70% were rubber soled and 30% vinyl. About 115 million rainwear (boots) were
sold in the United States and approximately 80% of these were vinyl. Imports were about
28% of the total  for canvas upper  shoes. Of the 23  million pairs of rubber waterproof
footwear sold in the United  States about  47% were imports. Table III-4 summarizes this
data.

     A variety of factors influence sales of U.S. manufacturers, the most important of which
are consumer  trends, dollar value, and type of product. Fabric upper shoes, and athletic
shoes have become increasingly popular,  whereas  the popularity of overshoes (boot  manu-
facturers) has declined  gradually. However, there has  been a steady increase in the dollar
value of sales over the years as shown in Table III-5.

                                     TABLE MM

                                  FOOTWEAR SALES

                              Millions of                      Percent
              Type of Product    Pain Sold    Percent of Rubber    Imports

               CanvM             250             70            27.6
               Booti           >   115             20            NA
               RubbtrBooti       23            100            47.7


                                         19

-------
                                     TABLE 111-5

                       RUBBER FOOTWEAR VALUE OF SHIPMENTS

                                   Year   $ Millions
1960
1963
1966
1969
1970
1971
265.5
354.2
410.2
471.9
515.0
519.8
                                    Substitution

     Rubber's major competition for use in soles, boots and rainwear is polyvinyl chloride.*
For almost all applications it can replace rubber, and it is easier to process.
 'Penetration into this market was about 24% - valued at $155 million in 1972.
                                          20

-------
                                    SECTION IV

                          SIC 3031 - RECLAIMED RUBBER

                                     Introduction

     This category includes establishments which are engaged primarily in reclaiming rubber
from scrap rubber tires, tubes, and miscellaneous waste rubber articles by processes which
result  in  devulcanization,  depolymerization, or regenerated products that  contain added
ingredients. These products are sold for use  as raw materials in the manufacture of rubber
goods, sometimes mixed with crude or synthetic rubber, sometimes not.

     The  value of sales of the reclaimed rubber has dropped sharply since the price of oil
extended  SBR dropped. During  1973,  the  average selling price of reclaimed rubber was
between  10  and 11 cents (at 50% hydrocarbon content)  per pound with prices ranging
anywhere from about Si per pound up to 15 or \6i per pound.  During 1973 oil extended
SBR could be purchased for  12 to 13^ per pound. At the same time, the cost of reclaiming
rubber increased because of higher costs for collecting scrap tires and for labor. Thus,  the
reclaimed-rubber producers have been caught in a profit squeeze. Many of them operate at a
loss, or at a very low profit margin.

     Reclaim production has declined from 565  million pounds in 1968 to  about 430
million pounds in 1973.

     The  oil crisis  has increased demand  for reclaim  rubber,  and this has resulted  in
increased  production at the  plants that remained in operation.  The consensus is that
shortages  of  synthetic  elastomers and compounding ingredients can be anticipated during
1974 and later. These will result in price increases for synthetic and natural rubber. If this
increase amounts to 50%, reclaim begins to  look attractive as a substitute. In addition, as
prices of reclaim are increased, the financing  capabilities and profits of these  companies
should improve.  Statistics that relate to financial aspects of the industry are shown in Table
IV-1, and  point out clearly the loss in sales of the industry over the years up to 1973. The
reversal of the downward trend in that year shows the effects of shortages.

                                    Technology

     There are three processes for reclaiming rubber:  the digester process, the pan process,
and the mechanical  process. All three  processes employ similar rubber scrap-separation and
size-reduction methods. They differ in the depolymerization and  the final processing steps.
                                        21

-------
                                     TABLE IV-1

                                 FINANCIAL TRENDS

Year

1958
1960
1962
1964
1966
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973*

Employees
(000)
2.2
2.4
2.1
1.9
2.0
1.7
1.6
1.6
1.2
—
—
Production
Workers
(000)
1.8
2.0
1.7
1.5
1.6
1.4
1.3
1.3
1.0


Value of
Shipments
($ millions)
39.3
49.2
49.8
44.4
52.7
48.3
44.8
41.2
32.1
-
41.9
Capital
Expenditures
($ millions)
1.0
2.8
1.0
3.6
1.3
1.5
1.2
1.0
.7


Value
Added
($ millions)
20.8
29.1
26.7
24.4
25.3
26.0
22.2
18.6
17.8

—
Cost of
Materials
($ millions)
18.6
21.7
22.9
20.4
27.6
23.4
23.0
21.2
14.5


  *1973 consumption 170,000 long tons (380.8 million pounds)with an estimated value of $41.9 million.

  Source:  Rubber Age, January, 1974

Digestion Process (Category B in  the Development Document).  In this process the rubber
product is  ground, heated  with depolymerizing agents in an autoclave digester, then in a
caustic medium to further polymerize and defiber the rubber; it is then washed,  dried and
packaged. Many of the major companies use both the digestion and dry pan process, but
most are switching to the dry process.

Dry  Digestion.* One company,  U.S. Rubber Reclaim,  uses a patented mechanical dry
process  which  defibers the rubber scrap  and runs it through a heated extruder  where it
directly obtains a finished product that is dry.

     In  the dry pan process, the rubber scrap is mixed  with reclaiming oils, heated in open
pans on a horizontal heater which  is kept  at 365°F for  2  to  18 hours. After further
processing, the product is packaged and shipped.

                            Company Size and Production

     Much of the rubber reclaim produced  today is  used internally by  the major tire
companies  and thus it  is extremely  difficult to obtain exact figures on  the amount of
reclaimed rubber that is  produced.  The Federal Trade  Commission reports 420 million
*Dry or Pan Process and the Mechanical Process (Category C In the Development Document)
                                         22

-------
pounds were produced in 1972. This dropped to about 380 million pounds in 1973. Reports
from  industry  are  somewhat higher, but may take into account material  that  is used
internally and not reported. These  estimates run as high as 450 million pounds for 1973.
Eight plants remain in the business; each is owned by a separate company. Midwest  Rubber
Reclaim  operated three plants at one time, but only the St. Louis plant is  in operation at
present. A plant in Barberton, Ohio, was recently shut down.

     Both Goodyear and Uniroyal operate in Canada. Goodrich also operates a pan  process
in Akron, Ohio,  for internal use, but it is understood  to be phasing out this operation
gradually. The companies are listed in Table IV-2.
                                     TABLE IV-2

                         AVERAGE PRODUCTION BY COMPANY
Location
Uniroyal
Naugatuck, CT
Midwest
St. Louis
Goodyear
Akron, OH
Firestone
Memphis, Tenn.
U.S. Rubber
Vicksburg, Miss.
Centrex
Findley, OH
B.F. Goodrich, Akron
Neopara
Trenton, NJ

Pounds/Per Day

250,000

348,000

260,000

200,000

142,000

85,000
85,000

40,000

Pounds/Year

61,000,000

87,000,000

50,000,000

50,000,000

43,000,000

20,000,000
20,000,000

10,000,000
341,000,000
Process

C

BandC

Municipal

Municipal

C

B
Municipal

Municipal

           Wet Digestion Cat. B
           Pan or Mechanical Cat. C

           Source:  Industry Spokesmen and Arthur D. Little  Estimates.
                                       23

-------
                               Employees in Segment


     This  segment employed 1200 (1000 production workers) in 1971, which results in a
production of  200.5 tons/production worker,  or  $17,800 value added per production
worker.

                                      Markets


     The eight  companies in this segment are listed by the Bureau of Census as reporting
their value of shipments as $31 million in 1972.  Industry reports about $43 million. A high
proportion of reclaim is used internally by tire companies.

     As shown in Table IV-3, consumption of reclaim rubber has declined gradually over the
years. There does not appear to be any prospect of altering this trend without a substantial
upheaval in the current price structure of virgin rubber or government action to promote its
use.
                                     TABLE IV-3*

                          CONSUMPTION OF RECLAIM RUBBER

                            Year   Consumption    Pounds
                                    (long tons)     (millions)
                            1973     170,000        380
                            1972     187,582        420
                            1971      200,474        449
                            1970     199,571         447
                            1968     250,426        560
                            1966     264,506        592


     The markets served by reclaimed rubber are shown in Table IV-4.

                                     TABLE IV-4*

                         RECLAIM CONSUMPTION BY PRODUCT

                                  Product            Percent

                            Tire and Repair Materials      67.4
                            Innertubes                 3.3
                            Auto Materials              9.9
                            Hose and Belts              5.6
                            Mechanical Goods           5.8
                            Cements and Dispersion      3.5
                            Heels and Soles               1.0
                            Rubber Surface             0.9
                            All others                   1.4
                                                     100

                            *Source: U.S. Department of Commerce.

                                         24

-------
                                    Diversification

     There are four major companies in this segment - Uniroyal, Goodyear, Firestone, and
Goodrich - all of whom have widely diversified interests. They produce reclaim largely for
internal  use  and as a means of disposing of their own scrap.  Other independents  are
diversifying to reclaim other materials or to use reclaim in special products of their own.
Most also do reclaiming for others.  These programs have been successful to only a limited
extent.

                                    Profit Range

     The profit  for companies producing reclaim  is low, and for that reason many com-
panies have closed.

                                    Substitution

     Rubber reclaim has always been considered as a low-cost replacement for virgin rubber,
and depending on cost, oil extended  virgin can replace reclaim. Reclaim's advantage is that it
promotes easy processing if used as part of a rubber composition. Virgin SBR now sells for
21 cents per pound. In 1973 it sold  for 17 cents per pound and oil extended at 13 cents per
pound. In addition to the price increase, shortages have also developed which make reclaim
attractive and allow a cost increase  of 10 to  11.5 cents (50% hydrocarbon) from the 1973
figure.

                           Effects  of Pollution Control Costs

     Reclaim companies have been operating in a declining market and have suffered from a
cost  squeeze between  increased costs for tire collection and processing, and the low price of
oil extended SBR. With  the added  cost of pollution control, as covered in the guidelines
document,  5 of the 8 companies probably will close, assuming conditions are similar to
those that existed during 1973. Factors which will influence the final decision will be:

     (1)  The effect of the oil crisis on reclaim markets and price.  1974 has already
         shown an increased demand.

     (2)  Action by the government relating  to waste disposal of tires and  incentives
         to keep reclaimers in business.

     (3)  Other interests such as plastic reclaim, rubber processing, ecology, etc.
                                         25

-------
                                    SECTION V

                     SIC 3041 - RUBBER HOSE AND BELTING

                                    Introduction

     This section covers establishments engaged primarily in the manufacture of rubber hose
and belting, including garden hose.  This segment was originally carried as part of SIC 3069,
but in 1972 was broken out as a separate classification.

                                    Technology

     The hose category covers a variety of hoses, including machine-wrapped ply hose,
hand-built hose,  and braided  and spiral hose.  Each is made on a slightly different type of
equipment, but common to all is the compounding equipment, which is similar to that used
in the tire industry.  The  process  of fabrication is basically extrusion with variations to
produce the particular end  product.

     The other major portion of this segment, belting, includes conveyor, elevator, and
transmission and V-belts. Compounding is carried out in the conventional manner as in  tire
plants. The compounded rubber is then calendered onto fabric cured in an autoclave or by
continuous cure. V-belts are made on special  equipment.  They have a wire reinforcement
center  and are covered with rubberized fabric. The rubber is mixed by standard methods,
i.e., in intensive  mixers. The  stock is then calendered onto fabric, slit, and wrapped onto
wire by means of special  equipment. The method of processing  places these products in
Category A - general molded extruded and fabricated rubber goods.

                                   Company Size

     The companies that manufacture these products are the major rubber companies. As in
the tire industry, the equipment used to manufacture these products requires a large capital
investment, and smaller companies  have gradually  dropped out of the business. At present
55  companies manufacture hose  and  belting and most of the majors are multiplant
companies. Many manufacture mechanical goods  in the same plants and  the mechanical
goods fall  into SIC 3069 — Rubber products not elsewhere classified. Table V-l lists the  top
18  producers, and their approximate sales.  Exact figures are  not  available in published
statistics  nor split out by the individual companies  from  their total fabricated  rubber
products sales.

     Our estimated breakdown by company size is shown in Table V-2.
                                        27

-------
                                 TABLE V-1
                        HOSE AND BELTING PLANTS
Company Name/Plant Locations


Gates Rubber Company — Denver, Co
   Denver, Co
   Elizabethtown, 111
   Galesbury, III
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company
Akron, Oh
   Lincoln, Ne, Marysville, Oh
   North Chicago, III
Swan Rubber Company, Division of
Amerace
Esna, Bucyrus, Oh
   Bucyrus, Oh
   Stillwater, Oh
   Worth ington, Oh
B.F. Goodrich Company — Akron, Oh
   Akron, Oh
   Marion, Oh
Uniroyal Industrial Products
   Kenneth, Mo
   Marysville, Mo
   Passaic, NJ
   Philadelphia, Pa
   Red Oak,  la
   Sandy Hook, Ct
Dayco Corporation, Dayton, Oh
   Dover, NJ
   Spingday, Mo
   Dayton, Oh
Inland Manufacturing Division, General
Motors Corporation — Dayton,  Ohio
Goodall Rubber Company — Trenton, NJ
Boston Woven Hose & Rubber Company
Division of American Biltrite  Inc.
Chelsea, Ma
Firestone Tire & Rubber Company
Noblesville, In
   Prescott, Ar
   Noblesville,  In
   Sales
($ millions)
  >200
  >200
      Type


V-Be Its & Hose



V-Belts&Hose
   >50
   >50
   >50
Industrial
V-Belts & Hose
V-Belts & Hose
   >50
Automotive
   >50
    45


    40

   40
Automotive & Hose
Hose & Belting


Garden & Heater

Industrial
                                      28

-------
Company Name/Plant Locations
TABLE V-1 (Continued)

              Sales
           ($ millions)
Electric Hose & Rubber Company
Wilmington, De                             40
Caterpillar Tractor - Peoria, III             25 - 30
Hewitt-Robins, Inc.
Division of Litton Industries
Buffalo, NY                                30
Atlantic Tubing & Rubber Company
Cranston, Rl                                20
Mercer Rubber Company
Hamilton Square, NJ                         1Q
Acme-Hamilton Corporation
Trenton, NJ                               <1Q
DeVilbiss Company — Toledo, Oh               g
H.K. Porter, Tnermoid Division
Bellefontaine, Oh                             Q

Source:  Industry estimates
        Type



Garden Hose & Industrial
Tractor Hose (Captive)


Industrial & Belting

Garden Hose

Reinforced

Conveyor Belt
Industrial

Industrial & Automotive
                                     29

-------
                                       Plants

     There are about 77 plants in this segment with the major companies operating several.
The location of these plants is shown in Table V-3.

                                                                     Guidelines
     Sales in Millions                Number of Plants                   Plant Size

     Greater than 50                        1                              L
     12 to 50                              13                              L
      5 to 12                              16                              M
     Under 5                              40                              S

                                    Employees

     This  segment has an estimated 17,000* production workers and total employment is
about 22,900.

                                   Diversification

     The companies in this segment have extensive sales in other categories. In most cases
plants also produce a line of products that may be classified as mechanical goods and that
includes products such as weather stripping, bumper guards, gaskets, etc.


                                     TABLE V-2

                                 SALES BY COMPANY

                          $ Millions        Number of Companies
                          Greater than 200           2
                          50 to 200                 5
                          20 to 50                  6
                          8 to 20                  4
                          All others                38_
                          Total                    55
 ' Estimate based on sales
                                        30

-------
                                      Markets

     In  1973 total sales in this category amounted to about $1 billion, including garden
hose. The Rubber Manufacturers Association (RMA) estimates are shown in Table V-3.

     In  1972, this category was included  in products not elsewhere classified and a good
breakdown of industry sales has not been made available. RMA estimates, however, have
been published for  1973,  as shown in Table V-4. These estimates  do not  include garden
hose, which is a $70 million business. Further revisions in the early 1973 estimates indicate
they should be increased and a more accurate total estimate, including garden hose, is $960
million to $ 1 billion.

     The annual growth rate predicted  for this segment through 1978  is 5.75%. Exports
exceed imports and represent about 2% of sales.

                                     TABLE V-3

                               INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS*
                            (Millions of Constant 1973 Dollars)

                           Product     1970   1971   1972   1973

                          Hose         360   385   410    512
                          V-Belts       175   183   190    216
                          Flat Belting    120   130   140    162
                           Totals       655   688   740    890

                          'Source:  Rubber Manufacturers Association

                                    Profit Range

     The profit before taxes for this segment averages about the same as the tire segment (8
to 12%).

                                   Diversification

     For the most part the companies in this segment are major rubber companies that have
diversified  products  in the fabricated rubber sector of the rubber processing industry, and
that make products such as tires, mechanical goods, coated fabrics, footwear, etc.
                                         31

-------
                                    Substitution

     Most of the products in this category require the unique characteristics of rubber and
substitution with plastic would in most cases result in products with inferior properties.
However,  plastics have replaced rubber in applications where cost is of major  importance,
garden hose, for example.

                           Effect of Pollution Control Costs

     Many of these plants dump into municipal systems. None of the plants questioned
indicated any intention of closing down because of the guidelines costs.
                                          32

-------
                                    SECTION VI

                   SIC 3069 - FABRICATED RUBBER PRODUCTS

                                    Introduction

     This category covers all fabricated rubber products not elsewhere classified. It includes
establishments engaged in manufacturing industrial and mechanical rubber goods, vulcanized
rubber coatings,  and miscellaneous  rubber specialties, such  as dipped  goods and drug
sundries.

                                    Technology

     The products in this classification fall into the guidelines Categories A and D. In the A
category  the stock  for  further processing  is prepared in  the conventional manner by
compounding in  an intensive mixer  or on  rubber mills. The stock is then handled by  a
variety of forming techniques, depending on the end product that is to be produced. For
example, the stock may be cut into solution for spread or dip  coating or used directly for
extrusion calendering or molding.

     In latex processing (Category D), the latex is compounded with fillers,  and curing
ingredients,  stabilizers, etc. then used for latex cements, foamed products, thread, or as  a
dip for forming gloves, balloons, etc.

                               Number of Companies

     In 1971 this category showed 1189* plants doing business. Of these, 646 companies
are listed as  doing more than $500,000 per year in this category. Of the 646 companies, 474
are single-plant companies, and 172 are multi-plant operations. The market in this category
is  dominated by the major rubber companies. The largest of these - Goodyear, Uniroyal,
and Dayco Corporation — do more than a $100 million worth of business, and share about
20% of the total market. There are roughly 71  companies doing over $10 million worth of
business a year. These companies represent about 65% of the total market in this category.
     A list of the top ten companies is  shown in Table VI-1, along with their relative
position in the industry.
'Census of Manufactures U.S. Department of Commerce.
                                        33

-------
                                   TABLE VI-1
                               SALES BY COMPANY
        SINGLE- AND MULTI-PLANT COMPANIES RANKED WITHIN SIC 3069

                                 Shipments    % of    Cumul       % of
         Company                (million $)    U.S.      %       Company     Rank
Goodyear Tire & Rubber
Akron, Ohio                        350.1      9.73     9.73       13.03        1
Uniroyal, Inc.
Middlebury, Conn.                   199.3      5.53    15.26       14.12        2
Dayco Corporation
Dayton,  Ohio                       144.5      4.01    19.27       51.74        3
General Tire & Rubber Co.
Akron, Ohio                          77.5      2.16    21.43         7.25        4
B.F. Goodrich Co., Inc.
New York, N.Y.                       68.1      1.89    23.32         5.92        5
Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.
Akron, Ohio                          63.0      1.75    25.07         3.42        6
American Biltrite Rubber Co.
Chelsea,  Mass.                         62.7      1.74    26.81       62.70        7
Amerace Esna
New York, N.Y.                       61.3      1.70    28.51       41.59        8
Garlock, Inc.
Rochester, N.Y.                       60.1      1.66    30.17       48.55        9
McCord  Corporation
Detroit,  Michigan                      50.0      1.39    31.56       35.54       10
Raybestos Manhattan Inc.
Bridgeport, Conn.                     49.3      1.37    32.93       41.32       11
Rubbermaid, Inc.
Wooster, Ohio                         44.9      1.25    34.18       78.63       12
Shelter Globe Corp.
Toledo,  Ohio                         39.5      1.10    35.28       21.64       13
Electric  Hose & Rubber Co.
Wilmington, Delaware                  38.0      1.05    36.33       100.00       14
Chicago Rawhide Mfg. Co.
Chicago, Illinois                       37.5      1.05    37.38       69.06       15
Gates Rubber Co., Inc.
Denver,  Colorado                     37.1      1.03    38.41        16.43       16
Eagle Richer Industries
Cincinnati, Ohio                       34.0        .93    39.34        14.40       17
A.M.F. Corporation
White Plains, N.Y.                     31.8        .88    40.22         5.86       18
Plymouth Rubber Co., Inc.
Canton, Mass.                         31.2        .86    41.08       100.00       19
International Paper Co.
New York, N.Y.                       30.0       .83    41.91         1.95       20

                                        34

-------
                                   Company Size


     The top  three  companies in this  segment shipped about  $350 million worth of
products in  1972. The  distribution of dollar  sales  versus number of companies in the
segment is shown in Table VI-2.


                                    TABLE VI-2

                              SALES CLASSIFICATION

                       Sales ($ millions)   Number of Companies*

                       Greater than 100            3
                       50 to 100                  7
                       20 to 50                  20
                       10 to 20                  41
                       5 to 10                   60
                       1 to 5                   285
                       0.5 to 1                  234
                                              646

                       'Economic Information Systems - includes plants.


                               Employees in Segment


     These companies employed about 126,000 workers in 1972,  of which about 93,000
were production workers.

                                      Markets


     Products produced in this segment and an approximate breakdown of the sales of the
different types are shown in Table VI-3. This category acts as a catchall for the vast number
of items that are produced by rubber manufacturers. As soon as a particular segment of this
SIC code grows to a relatively large volume, it is reported separately.

     The total value of shipments in this category was $3,260 million in 1970, and $3,750
million in  1973. Growth has averaged about 5% a year. The portion of this segment most
affected by imports has been soles and heels, which has declined 1 to 2% a year. In 1973,
sales were $123 million. Other products in the segment have not been as seriously affected.

     This segment also includes many captive companies, small specialty  plants, and com-
panies that sell only through jobbers. Major companies that are not primarily in the rubber
industry, for example, may produce an end item that requires rubber rolls, shock mounts, or
like  accessories.  Even though  volume requirements may be relatively  large,  they cannot
                                        35

-------
justify their own rubber processing plant. Manufacture of the products is put out forbid or
a company is selected because of reputation.

     Many of the plants in this segment are relatively old, and much of their equipment is
completely depreciated.  Overhead is low,  and they can  take on small jobs that the larger
companies could not produce at a reasonable cost.
          Product Classification

           General molded
           General extruded
           General fabricated
           General latex
       TABLE VI-3

    PRODUCT TYPES

         Types of Products            $ Total Sales

Heels, soles, drug sundries, battery boxes        45
Hose, profiles                             25
Coated fabrics, tape rainwear, etc.             23
Gloves, balloons, thread                      7
                                    Diversification

     Of the 646 companies  listed in this category, about  100 have interests outside this
category that represent more than 50% of their total business.  Examples are:  synthetic
rubber or resin production, tires, and other fabricated rubber goods.

                                     Substitution

     Many of the products in this category can be replaced by plastics such as  polyvinyl
chloride. However, subtle changes in properties might occur with raw material changes.
Normally,  a long-term approval is required on products and since specifications have been
built around rubber, they are difficult for a plastic to meet.

                                     Profit Range
     The profit  for this segment of the industry is about average for the rubber industry,
and will run between  8 and 12% profit before taxes, 4 to 6% after taxes. This varies with the
companies, depending on the competitive situation in their segment of the business.
                                          36

-------
                              Effect of Pollution Control

     About 85% of the companies in this segment are estimated to discharge into municipal
systems.  Many of these plants are  plants built prior to 1950. Many new plants that have
been built outside the major cities have found it  necessary to meet the local ordinances for
pollution control already and these will need to make only relatively minor investments.*
 ' Based on a survey conducted as part of this study.
                                          37

-------
                                  SECTION VII

    SIC 3293 - GASKETS PACKING SEALING DEVICES - COMPOSITIONS ONLY

                                   Introduction

     This category  covers establishments engaged  primarily in manufacturing gaskets, gas-
keting materials, compression packings,  molded packings, oil seals, and mechanical seals.
The SIC code includes gaskets made of leather, metal, and asbestos. Many gaskets are made
of compositions containing relatively small proportions (under 50%) of rubber. Rubber-con-
taining products represent about $175 million of a  total of $375 million listed in the annual
survey of manufacturers.

                                   Technology

     Rubber gaskets included in this section are made with conventional equipment similar
to that used in the tire industry; that is, intensive  mixers,  mills, etc.  Flat sheets  are
compression molded or calendered and gaskets dinked out. The technology of manufacture
places this product in Roy Weston's Category A - General Molded Extruded and Fabricated
Rubber Products.

                               Number of Companies

     This category includes  133 companies  with more than $500,000 in sales. Of these, 32
are multi-plant companies, and 101 single-plant companies. The total segment, i.e., including
all types of gaskets, has a sales volume of about $375 million. However, the portion of this
segment that represents gaskets with a rubber content of more than 50% is about $175
million, according to industry  reports.  The total  segment is dominated by 10 companies,
which among them have about 55% of the sales. The top three in this segment are: The
Federal Mogul Corporation—  10% of the  market, Garlock, Inc.,  and the Crane  Packing
Corporation, each with about 9% of the gasket total market. (See Table VII-1.)

                                  Company Size

     The major company in this segment, the Federal Mogul Company, shipped about $38
million  worth of goods classified in this  segment. The distribution of  dollar sales per
company to number of companies is:
                                       39

-------
                                  TABLE VIM

          SINGLE-AND MULTI-PLANT COMPANIES* RANKED WITHIN SIC 3293
 Company Name/Address
No. of  Shipments             Cumulative     % of
Plant*  ($ millioni)  Percent     Percent    Company  Rank
Federal-Mogul Corporation
Detroit, Michigan
Garlock Inc.
Rochester, N.Y. 14603
Crane Packing Co., Inc.
Morton Grove, III 60053
Johns-Manville Corp.
New York, N.Y. 10016
Int'l Packings, Corp.
Bristol, N.H.
Dana Corporation
Victor Division
3M Company
St. Paul, Minn 55101
Shelter Globe Corp.
Toledo, Ohio 43612
Armstrong Cork Company
Lancaster, Pa. 17604
Joslyn Mfg. & Supply Co.
Chicago, III. 60606
All other
Totals
4
3
1
2
2
1
7
2
2
1


37.9
34.7
34.2
30.0
18.5
13.7
11.0
9.9
7.9
7.8
169.0
374.6
10.10
9.25
9.12
8.00
5.24
3.41
2.93
2.64
2.11
2.08
45.12
100.00
10.10
19.35
28.47
36.47
41.71
45.12
48.05
50.69
52.80
54.88
100.00

15.71
28.03
81.43
6.47
5.24
2.54
1.12
5.42
2.14
9.97


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10


'Source:  Rubber Red Book, 1973 Economic Information Systems, Inc.
                                     40

-------
            Sales ($ millions)                      Number of Companies

           Greater than 30                                   4
           Between 10 and 30                                3
           Between 5 and 10                                 8
           Between 1 and 5                                 51
           0.5 to 1                                         67

                                     Plant Size
     The Rubber Red Book lists over 450 plants that produce gaskets, packings or o-rings as
part  of their production. The reason is that plants with molding and compounding capa-
bilities (Category  A) can  also make gaskets and  o-rings. For this reason they promote
business in this area, advertise and make products although it may represent only a small
amount of their total business.

                                   Diversification

     The bulk  of the companies in this segment produce a variety of products classified as
mechanical goods and a portion of these will be gaskets. The companies are  large,  with
diversified interests, and the gaskets and packings plants are a division of the company. The
larger companies of this type are:

                       Company                  Percent of Total Business

           Federal Mogul Corporation                        15
           Garlock, Inc.                                     28
           Johns-Manville                                    6
           Dana Corporation                                  3
           3M Company                                      1
           Sheller Globe Corporation                          5
           Armstrong Corporation                             2
           Josylyn Manufacturing & Supply Co.                10
           McCord Corporation                               2

                                Rubber Consumption

     This segment of the industry consumed about 22,000  long tons of rubber in 1972.
Types of rubber used depend on the application; automotive applications require nitrile or
neoprene rubber. Other uses not subject to attack by fuels may use SBR or EPDM. Acrylics
or fluorinated rubbers are used in hydraulic seals or for high temperatures.
                                        41

-------
                                    Profit Range

     The profit range for the gasket industry averages between 8 and 12% before taxes, and
between  4 and  6%  after  taxes, making it about normal  for the industry. With  smaller
companies, much of the  business will  be in  other products and they do riot segregate
profitability by product.

                                 Substitute Materials

     Since gaskets require the special recovery and  resilience characteristics of  rubber,
substitution for elastomers with non-elastomers would present difficult technical problems.
The  gasket industry, particularly  o-ring manufacturers, represent one of the major outlets
for the specialty rubbers such as fluorinated polymers, silicones, nitriles, acrylics, etc.; since
specifications are extremely difficult to meet, substitution possibilities are very limited.

                                Employees in Segment

     This segment employs a total of about 29,500 and about 26,100 production workers as
of 1971.

                                      Markets

     This segment of the industry requires production capabilities to make large numbers of
items at  low cost for the automotive industry as well as to make small numbers of specialty
items. The elastomer compounds are selected to meet unique problems of solvent resistance,
heat, etc. Large quantities of the  specialty rubbers such as silicones, fluorinated and acrylic
elastomers go into these products.

     Since so  many  products today use gaskets, including  items produced  in low volume,
business  is available  for companies willing to make short runs. In most cases the customer
pays for the mold, the rubber processor makes the product and both parties are satisfied.
The  job  is big for a small company, but too  small to interest the big  company. Foreign
competition is not a significant factor.

                           Effect of Pollution Control Costs

     Many of these  plants dump into municipal systems.  The average profitability of this
segment  is about typical  for the  rubber fabricating industry, and the companies' financial
situation is generally stable. We do not expect any plant closings as a result of the control
costs.
                                         42

-------
                                    SECTION VIII

                            SIC 7534 - RETREAD TIRES

     The  guidelines contractor  has  established that the retread industry's process waste
waters meet proposed standards and therefore require no control equipment. The reason for
this is that most retread operations are either part of a tire operation where the camelback
tread portion is made at the company, or the camelback is shipped to the  retreaders. The
retread step does not present a problem.

     There are many small retreaders among an estimated 5000 establishments in the United
States. About 4500 are registered with the National Tire Dealers and Retreaders Associ-
ation. Most of the major tire companies run retread operations.

     The  retread  business is changing. Passenger tire retreading has declined but truck tire
retreading has increased. A drop in sales of the camelback in 1972 is one barometer that the
total  retread  business is falling off. The cause has been related by many experts to concern
over safety rules relating to retread passenger car tires.  The full problem is not completely
clarified at the moment. However, a survey of dealers indicates they anticipate growth.*

                                     Technology

     Tires are retreaded either by hot cap techniques or by  cold bonding cured tread. In
both  techniques the carcass is inspected and the old tread buffed. In the cold proces cured
tread stock is bonded to the tire carcass. In  the hot cap process, an uncured rubber strip is
laid onto  the carcass, very similar to building a new tire,  and  the combination is cured in a
press.

                                  Number of Plants
     There are between 4000 and 5000 shops in the retread business. Among these are the
the major tire companies: Firestone, Goodyear, Goodrich, and General, etc. A number of
different rubber  companies  make  camelback for  sale to retreaders but the major tire
companies use their own stock. Most are tire dealers as well and the specific job assignments
are difficult to separate.

                                    Size of Shops

     Tables  VIII-1 and -2 reflect  the output profiles of the establishments that  retread
passenger tires.
"Tire Retreading Institute
                                        43

-------
     Passenger tire retreaders  in the  sample vary from  small shops to huge production
concerns.  The median establishment  produced 12,500  passenger tire  retreads while the
largest concern turned out over 200,000 units annually.

     During 1972 these shops produced an average of 20,674 units per year.
                                    TABLE VIII-1

               ANNUAL PASSENGER OUTPUT OF RETREADERS BY VOLUME
                              By Volume Categories - 1972

                              Annual Output    % Shops

                               2,500 Sunder      18.2
                               2,501 - 5,000     10.6
                               5,001 - 7,500     13.6
                               7,501-10,000      9.1
                              10,001 - 15,000      7.6
                              15,001-20,000      9.1
                              20,001 - 30,000     10.6
                              30,001-45,000     12.1
                              45,001 - 60,000      4.6
                              60,001 & over        4.5
                              Total             100.0
                                    TABLE VIII-2

            ANNUAL TRUCK OUTPUT OF RETREADERS BY VOLUME BRACKETS
                                        1972

                               Annual Output    % Shops
500 or under
501 - 1,000
1,001 - 1,500
1,501 - 2,000
2,001 - 3,500
3,501 - 5,000
5,001 - 7,500
7,501 - 10,000
10,001 - 12,500
12,501 Stover
19.4
3.2
3.2
21.0
19.4
8.1
12.9
6.4
3.2
3.2
                                 Total           100.0
                                         44

-------
                                    Diversification

     The major companies are tire producers and retreading represents a very small portion
of their total business. The smaller retreaders in most cases also act as agents for the sale of
new tires.

                                       Markets

     The production of tread rubber from  1968 to 1972 is shown in Table VIII-3. This data
was obtained from Industry  Surveys,*  September, 1973, and the 1972 figures are not in
agreement with those of tire dealers, who quote a total of 693 million,  versus 569 million
pounds by Industrial Surveys in  1972. The breakdown of this portion of total poundage
used in the various types of tires is shown in Table VIII-4. This poundage resulted in the
production of 47 million tires in 1972 (Table VIII-5).

                                     TABLE VIII-3

                      SHIPMENTS OF TREAD RUBBER (CAMELBACK)

                                 Year   Production
1972
1971
1970
1969
1968
569,298
608,513
622,413
598,417
610,108
                                 Source: Modern Tire Dealer, 1973

                                     TABLE VIII-4

                             RUBBER USAGE BY TIRE TYPE

                            Type of Tire    Pounds of Rubber
                                              (millions)
                            Passenger           277.2
                            Commercial           69.3
                            Truck              277.2
                            OTR                55.4
                            Specialty             13.9
                            Total               693.0

                            Source: Modern Tire Dealer, 1973
 *Sourca:  Industry Surveys, Standard and Poor's Sept 13,1973.
                                         45

-------
                                     TABLE VIII-5

                         NUMBER OF TIRES RETREADED IN 1972

                               Type of Tire     Number

                                             (millions)
                               Passenger         30.8
                               Commercial        5.8
                               Truck           10.6
                               Total            47.2

                               Source:  Modern Tire Dealer, 1973


                                     Substitution


     Tire retreading provides an inexpensive tire  that, if properly retreaded, gives excellent
and  low cost per mile service. Well-built original  equipment  tires can be retreaded and
reduce the number of tires that normally contribute to solid waste loads. However, low-cost
lines of new tires compete closely with the retreads.
     Reports from tire dealers, including retreaders, provide data on median prices (Table
VIII-6).

     Sears, Roebuck  for example, offers a good polyester, tubeless blackwell, G78-14, for
$26.95, versus a similar sized highway retread for $13.44. However, it also offers a low cost
4-ply nylon of the same size for $17.95. (See 1973 catalog, Fall and Winter.)

                                     TABLE VIII-6

                                 RETREAD TIRE PRICES
                                          ($)

                                               Median Price
                           Type of Tire         1972     1973
                        Passenger Retread        13.51     14.04
                        Passenger New          31.91     34.22
                        Truck Tires 10.00-20
                          Top Cap            32.86       -
                          Full Cap            38.30

                              Effects of Pollution Control


     This segment is not affected by the  guidelines since no controls are required in the
 stual retreading step.

                                          46

-------
                                    SECTION IX

                          ECONOMIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

                                    Methodology

     In  evaluating the effect of pollution control costs on the economy, we have assumed
that if possible the cost will be passed along in the form of higher prices. However, there are
industries such as those manufacturing footwear and related products or reclaimed rubber
where it will be impractical for these costs to  be passed along because of a competitive
business situation. In other cases, if most of the competitors are on municipal systems, the
competitors will have no incentive to raise costs and will tend to reduce or prevent increases.

     In  our calculations we have assumed the plants studied in this report will be working at
their  1972-1973  production  levels  during  the  years 1977 through 1983.  We have  also
ignored  price increases that may be anticipated because of increased cost of raw materials,
utilities, and labor.

     For purposes  of  this study  we  have also  assumed that  companies  currently on
municipal systems will incur no additional charges and will not be affected by these costs.
We have also assumed that 90 to 95% of the plants with less than $5 million in sales are on
municipal systems and will not be impacted. These figures are based on data from industry
spokesmen and a survey of companies' published data.

     In  evaluating the impact we have used the following assumptions with respect to plants
on municipal systems:

     (1) Small plants, under $5 million in sales, are generally located in areas where
         they have been tied into  municipal systems. The  survey indicates that  90  to
         95% fall into this category.
     (2) Medium-sized plants are frequently located in areas where municipal systems
         are not as readily available. Our survey indicates that 85% are on municipal
         systems.
     (3) Large plants are the most likely to be placed in small towns or in areas where
         they cannot tie into municipal systems. Our figures show that 80% are on
         municipal systems, or have already met the guidelines.

     A summary analysis and the assumptions and mathematics of our Methodology follow
as they relate to different criteria for judging economic impact.
                                        47

-------
                                    Assumption 1

     Small companies that  have limited capital  and that  cannot increase prices  are con-
sidered as potential candidates for closing if the costs and retirement of debt exceed 50% of
their before-tax earnings. Liabilities for a small Category A  plant that had to borrow money
at 10% and wished  to retire the debt in  five years would be $24,242 per year, less
depreciation. The annual costs, including depreciation, are shown in Table IX-1.

     On the basis of this criterion, companies were considered to have a high potential for
closing  if  they  were  in  extremely competitive industries (such as footwear or rubber
reclaiming), could not raise  prices, and would find it necessary to borrow. We have assumed
money would be available  for  companies that have profits and  sales greater than those
shown in  Table  IX-2.  Conversely, companies with sales lower than those  shown  and that
must  bear the full  costs because they are not on municipal  systems or have  not already
invested in some control equipment, may close.
                                     TABLE IX-1

                  POLLUTION CONTROL COSTS - CATEGORY A PLANTS
                                         ($)
                                               Before-Tax Costs    After-Tax Costs

         Investment                   79,000
            Capital Repayment*          15,800                        15,800
            I merest Charges**             4,342         4,342
            Depreciation***              7,900         7,900
            Operating and Maintenance     11,400        11,400
            Energy and Power Costs         600           600          	
            Totals                     40,042        24,242          15,800

         The assumptions are as follows:
            "Capital borrowed and repaid in equal installments over five years.
          **ln "est at 10% on  unpaid balance — monthly payments.
         ***Dei_, jciation — ten years.
                                         48

-------
                                    TABLE IX-2

                   MINIMUM-SIZED PLANTS WITH REQUIRED CAPITAL

                         Before-Tax Profit on Sale*      Sal«t
                                  (%)            ($ millions)
                                  1                4.84
                                  2                2.42
                                  3                1.62
                                  4                1.21
                                  5                0.97
                                  6                0.81
                                   Assumption 2

     Price increases should be made to hold after-tax profits at their original value. Capital is
available. Return on investment is 10% per year after taxes. Where prices can be raised the
calculation is a direct relationship between control costs and sales as follows:

                                                   Control Costs
            Percent Price Increase =                      Sales

     Control costs include return on investment. Thus, for a small Category A plant, the
cost would be $24,242 including depreciation and the price increase for a company with a
million dollars in sales would be 2.42% This cost would present a major problem in critical
segments such as footwear, reclaim and suppliers to these industries. Suppliers of soles and
heels, who are part of Segment 3069 (Products Not Elsewhere Classified), are an example.

                                Basis for Conclusions

     Annual operating costs due to  pollution  control equipment  were calculated for the
plants in our survey by applying the appropriate tentative cost estimates given to us in the
effluent guidelines development document  for each segment. Depreciation is straight line
over a period of ten years. The development document uses a five-year depreciation figure.
However,  since ten years  is more commonly used, this figure is used in our calculations.
Borrowed money is repayed  over a five-year period.  The new investment in pollution
control  equipment is calculated as being financed by debt through borrowing from banks.
Interest costs are estimated at 10% per year as a pre-tax expense.

     Tables  IX-3 and IX-4 summarize the important data used in our evaluation of the
impact of pollution control costs for B.P.T., and B.A.T. treatments are the same as B.P.T.:
except in the  lead sheathing process for making hose. Estimates of  the total  number of
                                        49

-------
SIC
Code Title
3021 Footwear
Number of Plants
Total Direct
in U.S. Discharge
70 9
Investment ($ 000)
Average
Total Per Plant
1,414 156
TABLE IX-3
B.P.T. COSTS
Annualized Costs ($ 000)
Average
Total Per Plant
585.3 65
Costs/Sales (%)
Sales ($ millions)
Total Not on
Segment Municipal
600 191.0
Plants in
Sample:
Direct Discharge
0.31
Plant Range
0 - 7.14
                                                                                                                                                                       Possible      Loss in
                                                                                                                                                                        Plant        Sales
                                                                                                                                                                       Closings    1$ millions)

                                                                                                                                                                           3          3.25
3031    Reclaim
                                                        921       230
                                                                              379.8
                                                                                             95
                                                                                                           43
                                                                                                                        23.0
                                                                                                                                        1.65
                                                                                                                                                        0-3.5
                                                                                                                                                                                     18.27
3041    Hose & Belting
   55          8        1,250        139        495.0          58          1,000         140.0
                                                                                                                                         .34
                                                                                                                                                        0- 1.4
3069    Rubber Products       1,189        124       14,763       119        5262.0          42         3,750          858.0

        Not Elswhere

        Classified
                                                                                                                                         .59
                                                                                                                                                        0-7.14
                                                                                                                                                                          12         17.75
3293    Gaskets/Sealing         133         14        1.664       118         707.2
                                                                                             51
                                                                                                          375
                                                                                                                        63.5
                                                                                                                                        1.1
                                                                                                                                                        0-7.14
                                                                                                                                                                                      4.75
        Totals
1,455        159       20,012       126"      7429.3          51*         5.768        1275.5
                                                                                                                                        0.58*
                                                                                                                                                                          22         44.02
 'Average for all plants - direct discharge

-------
                                                                                              B.P.T.   COSTS
                                                                                                                                                   Costs/Sales (%)
                                          Number of Plants        Investment 1$ OOP)      Annuitized Com ($ OOP)        Sales ($ millioni)              Plants in                         Possible      LOB in
            SIC                          Total       Direct                  Average                    Average       Total          Not on          Sample:                           Plant        Sato
            Co*         Jjtie            inU.S.    Discharge      Total     Par Rant       Toul       Par Plant      Segment     Municipal     Direct Discharging     Plant Range      Closings    ($ millions!


            3041    Hose Only

                    Lead Process            9          0*         135          15            27            3          40          40**               .067              NA             00
             'All on municipal


            "All Plants must comply with regulation
(si

-------
companies and the proportion of companies on municipal systems in each segment are based
                                      4
on  discussions  with  associations, industry  spokesmen,  and the U.S. Tariff  Commission
figures. Table IX-5 tabulates this data and shows the number of companies reported for each
segment and the percent of plants in this segment that are not on municipal systems. This
figure is used in the calculation of investment and annualized costs in Tables IX-3 and IX-4.

     Table IX-6 summarizes investment and annual cost as a percent of sales for the various
segments for B.P.T. and B.A.T. pollution abatement levels. B.A.T. applies for  only a small
portion of the industry and includes plants which make hose by the lead process. Table IX-7
presents an analysis of typical large and small plants in the various segments.

                                    Price Effects
     The range of calculated price increases for each of the segments is given in Tables IX-3
and IX-4, and summarized in IX-6. This range is based on the effluent guidelines document
estimates for meeting the B.A.T. pollution standards. The probable price increase is based
on  companies that have $5 million in sales since smaller companies  will not be able to
establish prices higher than those established by companies this size or larger.

     The price increases that could be expected to attain B.A.T. pollution control standards
are based on 1973 prices. B.A.T. requirements apply only to hose made by the lead process.

     The critical  segments  are  footwear and reclaimed  rubber, and price increases are a
problem. However, this analysis has been made  at  a time when inflationary  trends are at
work and the dollar value is low; there will be a  tendency to increase prices to take care of
pollution control costs. The deterring factor will be competition  and  plants on municipal
systems that do not need to raise prices.

     The smaller firms need to raise their per-unit prices to a greater degree than the larger
firms. Small companies, specifically footwear companies, that are not on municipal systems
are expected  to tie into them. However,  we do not expect any  major changes in the
industry. Price increases will be held to a minimum because of foreign competition.

     Manufacturers of rubber products may tolerate temporary price increases in reclaimed
rubber because of the current rubber shortage. The effects on the various segments will vary.
We anticipate the following effects:

     Footwear Industry (SIC 3021). The smaller companies in this segment that are not on
municipal systems will be the most severely affected. To avoid the cost they will probably
attempt  to  tie into municipal  systems,  and if necessary,  will  change locations and  rent
facilities that are tied  into municipal  systems.Plant closings in  these  cases may be only a
relocation.  In many cases, where municipal systems are available,  the new location may be
in the immediate vicinity and the old workers will be retained.
                                         52

-------
                                                                  TABLE IX-5

                                              TOTAL NUMBER OF PLANTS USED IN CALCULATIONS

                              SIC Code                 3021        3031      3041            3069             3293

                                                                           Hose and     Other Products
                                Name                Footwear     Reclaim    Belting         N.E.C.*        Gaskets; Sealing

                       Number of Plants in Segment         70          8         55           1.1891              133
                       Size by Sales ($ millions)
                            over 50                       1                     7              10                0
                            12 to 50                     13                     8              50                5
                            5-12                       16                     3             191                 9
                            Under 5                     19                     5             515               59
£                            Other                     23                    32             647               60

                       Number of Plants in Sample
                       Not on Municipal                    948             1242               14
                       Size by Sales ($ millions)
                            over 50                       1                     120
                            12 to 50                      3                     2              10                1
                            5-12                       2                     1              29                1
                            Under 5                      2                     1              51                6
                               Other                      1                     3              32                6

                        *Not Elsewhere Classified

                        1. 1971 Bureau Census
                        2. Includes three latex plants

-------
                                                    TABLE IX-6

                                                  PRICE EFFECTS
SIC Code
3021
3031
3041
3069
3293
Product
Footwear
Reclaim
Hose & Belting
Misc. Rubber Products
Gaskets, Sealing
BPT Range Probable Effect
fl
0-
0-
0-
0-
0-
7.14 None
3.5 None
5.8 0.34
7.14 0.6
7.14 <1
BAT Range
NA
NA
0-0.6
NA
NA
Probable Effect
NA
NA
None
None
NA
Price Effects
Other Products
None
None
None
Variable
Variable
Plant
Shutdown
3
3
0
0
0
* Depends on product
 Only one plant which makes latex foam seating

-------
          TABLE IX-7




ANALYSIS OF SELECTED COMPANIES
Company
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
1
J
Product

Footwear
Footwear
Reclaim
Reclaim
Hose- Belting
Hose-Belting
Misc. Products
Misc. Products
Gaskets
Gaskets
Sales
($ millions)
100
2
6.7
4.7
40
8
40
6
18
1
BPT
Investment
($000)
212
79
265
265
212
163
569
163
212
79
BPT
Investment/
Sales
(%)
0.212
3.95
3.9
5.6
0.53
2.0
1.42
2.7
1.2
7.9
BAT
Investment/
Sales
(%)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
BPT
Annual
Cost/Sales
(%)
0.0856
1.78
1.58
2.25
0.21
0.85
1.71
1.13
0.5
3.57
BAT
Annual
Cost/Sales
(%)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Plant Closing
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes

-------
     Rubber Reclaim  (SIC 3031).  We anticipate the closing of 37% of the plants in this
segment (3 plants) if they are forced to meet the  standards. The loss to manufacturers is
that reclaimed rubber improves the processing characteristics of rubber compounds if it is
added in small proportion to the total  compound. Reclaimed rubber is also important in
many adhesive applications. From the standpoint of ecology, it has provided an outlet for
used tires and other rubber products that constitute  a difficult problem in waste disposal.

     Hose and Belting (SIC 3041).  Within this segment there may be certain small changes.
Because of differences in  plant size, age, and already existing pollution abatement equip-
ment, the larger companies will increase their prices less than the smaller companies would
like to increase their  prices. Generally,  this segment is composed of larger companies ($5
million and greater) that can absorb cost increases relatively well. The products are often
somewhat specialized and  are less competitive than those in many other segments. For this
reason many may increase prices. We anticipate no closings.

     Rubber Products Not Elsewhere Classified (SIC 3069). Many of the products manufac-
tured in this  category eventually  end up  as components of other  products.  A typical
example is soles and heels, which yield a comparatively low margin of profit. Price increases
would probably be passed on to the footwear companies. Smaller footwear companies will
suffer the most. Increased costs of these materials in addition to  other increased costs that
the footwear manufacturer, would by necessity, have to add would have the net effect of
making the footwear manufacturers less competitive with foreign imports.

     This  is  a large segment with many small companies. We anticipate about  one percent
may close because of high costs and low profits. There are 1189 plants in this segment and
we estimate about 12, or one percent, will close because of the guidelines.

     Gaskets, Packing and Sealing  Devices  (SIC 3293).  Within this segment there may  be
relatively minor changes.  Because of plant size and  the pollution abatement equipment that
many already have,  the  larger companies  will increase their prices less than the smaller
companies would like to increase theirs. In other  words, the  profitablility of the smaller
firms would  decrease relative to the larger firms. This segment  contains a number of small
firms but we estimate that less than 3%, or 3 out of  144 plants, will close.

                                  Financial Effects

     Raising prices to maintain return on equity, should not have any major financial effects
on the industry as a whole. However, certain of the smaller firms would need to raise their
prices more than the larger firms. If they cannot, their profit margins will decrease. In the
long run this  could change the structure of the industries slightly, particularly among the
smaller  companies.  In the footwear segments, for example, companies not on municipal
systems cannot compete because of costs and they  may be forced into a position where
larger companies will acquire  them for reasons such as deferred depreciation,  etc.  Small
companies on municipal systems will not be affected.
                                        56

-------
                                 Capital Availability

     Of all the companies we have studied we consider those with lower profit margins —
e.g.,  the footwear and reclaimed rubber -  could have problems raising the necessary capital
to meet the pollution guidelines. Obviously, this is a problem also with smaller companies in
all segments. However, the rubber business requires a large financial investment in operating
equipment to  remain competitive.  Smaller  companies have always had this problem of
capital but survive because of higher-cost  specialty orders. As mentioned  previously (As-
sumption  1), we have  assumed that any company that retains less than 50% of its pretax
profit after pollution control costs can be expected to close.

                               Production Curtailment
     Plants that are not on municipal systems would probably have to shut down tempo-
rarily to segregate their process effluent lines from other effluent lines. In the footwear
segment, plants are generally operating under capacity at present, and closings would cause
the needed capacity  to be made by other plants in the industry.  Shortages of reclaimed
rubber, can  be anticipated and probably a price increase, but'this increase would not be
expected to cover all control costs. With increased costs, SBR will be the preferred choice.

                                   Plant Closings

     On the basis of our data and industrial responses, the segments where we feel there is a
potential for plant closings are in SIC  Codes 3021, Rubber Footwear; 3031, Reclaimed
Rubber; 3069, Rubber Products Not Elsewhere Classified; and in 3293, Gaskets Packings
and  Sealing Devices.  The major effect  will  be on  plants that are not tied to  municipal
systems. These  manufacturers will  give  serious  consideration to closing  or  moving to
locations where they can tie into municipal systems.

     Many  reclaimed-rubber plants have already closed because of pollution control  and
economic problems. We anticipate that more will do so when these guidelines go into effect.
Of the eight plants now in  operation, we  anticipate that three will close.

     All small companies that are not on municipal systems have a potential for closing if
they cannot go  onto  municipal systems. These companies operate on a low profit margin
and would have high annual pollution control costs. We estimate that four or five plants that
make soles and  heels and certain latex  products and are not  on municipal systems have
potential problems.

                                 Community Impact

     If these plants were shut down, workers would be laid off. We estimate that the layoffs
would amount to about 250 workers in the reclaimed rubber business, between 200 and 300
in the footwear business, and 700 in the other categories. These plants are spread out over
the country.
                                         57

-------
                   Impact of Pretreatment Standards for New Sources

     Of the pollutants being  controlled, the metals will require pretreatment  before  dis-
 charge  into municipal systems. These metals are: (1) lead  from the hose plants (General
 Molded, Extruded, and Fabricated Rubber Products categories) which use a lead sheath
 cure, (2) chromium from the plants  which use chromic acid in form-cleaning from latex
 dipping manufacture, and (3) zinc from the use of zinc oxide as a rinsing agent in latex foam
 manufacture. The effect of Pretreatment Standards for New Sources (PSNS) covering the
 above pollutants is explored below.

     PSNS  could affect either industry growth  or the  incentive to tie into  municipal
 systems. Industry growth will not be  affected to a significant extent  because: (a) the cost
 of pretreatment is small compared to the total cost of construction of a Rubber Processing
 plant, (b) the cost per pound of product is small and is partly recoverable by price increases
 in some cases, and (c) the  net effect on profitability is small and  not  nearly enough to
. discourage investment in these industry segments. Discussion of the effect of New Source
 Performance Standards (above) applies in part to the effect of Pretreatment Standards for
 New Sources.

     PSNS  could produce  a disincentive to tie into municipal  systems if pretreatment for
 the metals would require removal of most of the other pollutants so that an entire treatment
 plant must  be constructed. This is not the case here because the lead-laden stream in the
 lead sheath  cure process can be isolated and treated separately. The chromium-laden rinse
 water from the form-cleaning operation in some latex dipping plants can also be segregated
 from the principal waste stream and treated. Chromic acid might be substituted for in order
 to reduce the pollution load still more. Finally, the zinc-laden foam rinse waters in latex
 foam manufacture can be pretreated  to the  standards by precipitation and clarification. In
 all cases, the standards for the three metals  could be pretreated without building the entire
 treatment system, hence the incentive to tie into  municipal systems to gain economies-in-
 scale will remain.

     The proposed standards do not include  pretreatment  standards for existing sources,
 which  will  be issued later;  however, some  analysis of the potential impact  on existing
 sources has been  performed. The  cost and impact  of  lead  treatment on those plants
 discharging into  municipal  systems are included in this analysis. The cost  and impact of
 chromium pretreatment has not  been included because the pretreatment standards do not
 apply to minor discharges into municipal systems (defined as discharging less than 50,000
 gallons per day), and because the use of chromic acid for form washing is not widespread
 and chromic acid might be substituted for  to reduce the pollution load.  Because  the only
 latex form  plant is a direct discharger, the cost and impact of the zinc  standard has been
 factored into this analysis.

      In summary, PSNS will have a minor effect on industry growth and will not hinder the
 incentive to tie into municipal systems. In addition, preliminary analysis of the impact of
 potential pretreatment standards for existing sources indicates a minor impact.
                                          58

-------
                                  Industry Growth

     We do  not believe that  the economic effects of the B.P.T. or B.A.T. guidelines will
adversely affect the growth or the growth potential of the industries, since it represents such
a small portion of total  investment. We have no way of evaluating the  effect  on plant
expansion decisions.

                              International Trade Effects

     The recent devaluations of the U.S. dollar have made the U.S. produced products much
more competitive  on the international scene.  This  is particularly  true in the  footwear
industry, which has been suffering from imports over the last two years. Currently, the U.S.
dollar has been relatively stable with respect to the currency of other countries. Although
no one can forecast what  the situation will be in 1977 and thereafter, it is doubtful that it
will be much different from now.

     An  initial analysis of the  economic impact of the proposed water effluent guidelines
upon the Rubber Processing Industry; Rubber Footwear (SIC 3021), Rubber Reclaim (SIC
3031), Hose and Belting (SIC 3041), Rubber Products Not Elsewhere Classified (SIC 3069)
and  Gaskets Packing and Sealing Devices (SIC 3293)  and  Retread  Tires (SIC 7534) was
performed based on  the abatement  costs supplied by EPA.  On this basis, 22 plant closings
are anticipated, or about 1.5% of the non-tire segment of the rubber processing industry, the
capital investment required for pollution control will be $19.5 million. BAT requirements
apply only to  the lead hose process and amounts to $135,000. Annual operating costs will
be $5.1 million for BPT and $27,000 for BAT.

     The rubber footwear (SIC 3021) and  Rubber Reclaim (3031) segments will be the
most severely impacted with probable closures of 4.2 and 37.5%, respectively.

                                Limits of the Analysis

     When interpreting the findings of this study, one must be aware of the limitations of
the  cost data, specifically as regards BPT guidelines and the key assumptions used. Invest-
ment costs  of the pollution  control equipment were defined  to include the  direct, incre-
mental investment required to  obtain environmental  standards. The  operating costs for the
pollution control were defined to be incremental costs.

     The establishment of pollution standards as well as the determination of the cost basis
for  investment  and  operating  costs was provided in the  effluent guidelines  development
document. In the Appendix to  our report we have listed the cost data used in estimating the
investment  and operating costs for the  plants. Additional data input to our study was
provided through  interviews and questionnaires to industry representatives. This data was
                                         59

-------
used to  supplement the  information. Only pollution  abatement  costs associated with
Federal standards were considered and these costs were  assumed to  be independent of air
and solid waste control requirements.

     The guidelines from the Contractor did not supply  data relating to plants that are on
municipal systems vs. those that  were not. Our assumptions relating to the percentage of
companies  on municipal systems are based on a limited  survey of the industry in each
segment. The  percentages reported to us by industry spokesmen were used in our calcula-
tions. They are only to be considered as best estimates.

     The calculated price  effects  on the various segments of the pollution guidelines BAT
and  BPT are  maximum  expected price increases. Certain companies and  certain plants
already meet the BPT guidelines. Because of this, they may not increase their prices at all,
and other companies within the industry may follow suit.

     Because of the nature and sources of statistics available a certain  number of plants have
been reported in one or more segments. One plant, for example, may report products that
are made in two segments, and thus would have been used twice in  our statistical analysis.
This is unavoidable and will give a total number, of plants that is high.
                                         60

-------
                                    APPENDIX

                                Conclusions From the

           "DEVELOPMENT DOCUMENT FOR EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS,
               GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS OF PERFORMANCE"

     There are four major groupings in the rubber processing industry. These groupings,
determined  on the basis of raw materials usecr or products  produced, include:  1) the
General Molded, Extruded,  and Fabricated Products industry; 2) the Reclaimed Rubber
industry; 3) the Latex-based Products industry; and 4) the Polysulfide Synthetic Rubber
industry.

     For the purpose of establishing effluent limitations,  the General Molded, Extruded,
and  Fabricated Rubber Products industry has been termed Category A. This industry has
been further subcategorized  by facility  size,  as determined by usage of raw  materials.
Process waste water flow rates and loadings and costs of control technologies substantiate
this breakdown. Factors such as manufacturing  process, final product, raw materials, plant
age,  geographical location, air pollution equipment, and the nature and treatability of the
waste waters are similar within each size subcategory and- further substantiate  the subcate-
gorization of this industry.

     Process waste waters evolved from facilities within Category A included discharges of
processing solutions, washdown of plant areas, runoff from outdoor storage areas, spills and
leaks of organic solvents and lubricating oils, and vulcanizer condensate. Primary pollutants
(or indicators of pollution) in these waste waters are oil and grease, suspended solids, and
acidity  and/or alkalinity (pH). Lead and COD are other pollutants of importance encoun-
tered in hose fabrication which employs lead-sheathed or cloth-wrapped cures.

     To  be controlled  and  treated, process waste waters must be isolated from other
nonprocess waste waters such as service water discharges and uncontaminated storm runoff.
Treatment  of process waste  waters in  a combined process/nonprocess system is ineffective
because the relatively large volume of  nonprocess waste  waters dilute  the contaminated
process waste waters.  Segregated processing solutions such as anti-tacking agents  can be
containerized. Segregated oily process waste waters can be treated in an API-type separator.

     The reclaimed rubber industry has been further subdivided in this  study based on the
process employed.  Category  B - Wet Digestion Rubber Reclaiming employs a wet process;
Category C - Pan (Heater),  Mechanical, and Dry Digestion Rubber Reclaiming uses dry
processes. Process waste water flow rates and loadings substantiate this categorization.

     Process  waste waters evolved by both Category B  and  Category C  plants include
discharges of processing solutions, washdown and runoff from all plant areas, spills and leaks
of organic  solvents and lubricating oils, and discharges from wet air-pollution devices. An
                                        A-l

-------
additional  process  waste water  evolved by  the  Wet Digestion process (Category B)  is
dewatering liquor.  No  additional process waste waters are evolved in  the dry  processes
(Category C). Primary pollutants (or indicators) are COD, oil and grease, suspended solids,
and acidity and/or alkalinity (pH). Zinc can be present in Wet Digestion waste water.

     The technologies necessary to control and treat waste waters from the Pan (heater).Dry
Digestions, and  Mechanical processes (Category C) are similar to those employed for the
Molded, Extruded and Fabricated Rubber industry. These include isolation of process waste
streams, containment of processing solution wastes, and treatment of other process waste
waters for suspended solids and oil.

     Treatment  of processing waste waters from the Wet Digestion process involves isolation
and  containment of  processing  solutions and the recycle  and reuse of oil-contaminated
dewatering liquors and discharges from wet air-pollution equipment.

     The  Latex-based Products industry,  termed Category D, has been further subcate-
gorized based on the  process, plant size, waste water characteristics, and treatability of the
waste  waters. There are two  subcategories: Type 1, the latex  dipped goods, latex thread,
and latex molding industry; and Type 2, the latex foam industry.

     Process waste  waters evolved from both subcategories include product wash and rinse
waters and spills, leakage, washdown, and runoff from all plant areas. Primary pollutants (or
indicators) are  COD, BOD, suspended  solids, oil, and acidity and/or alkalinity (pH). In
addition, zinc is present in process  waste waters evolved  at  latex foam facilities. When
chromic acid is used as a form-cleaning agent, chromium will be present in the process waste
waters from latex-dipped or latex-molded facilities.

     The technologies necessary  to control and treat waste  waters from  the production of
latex-based products (Category  D)  include  segregation of process waste water streams,
coagulation  and clarification  of latex-laden waste waters, and biological treatment.  In
addition, chemical  precipitation  of zinc in rinse waters is necessary at facilities producing
latex foam.

     The Polysulfide Synthetic Rubber industry (Category  E)  is not covered in this docu-
ment. Rather, this  industry will be examined in a future document which, when completed,
" will be incorporated into this report.

     As a result of this study the recommendations for the segments were:

     Process  waste waters evolved  from the General Molded,  Extruded, or Fabricated
 Rubber Products category (Category A) should be  treated and  monitored for suspended
 solids, oil and grease, lead,  and pH.  Proposed  limitations and standards for the best
 practicable control technology currently  available  are based  on raw material usage. For
 plants consuming less than 3,720 kg/day (8,200 Ibs/day) of raw  materials  these are:
                                         A-2

-------
         Suspended Solids              0-64 kg/kkg (lb/1,000 Ibs) raw material
         Oil and Grease                °-l6 kg/kkg (lb/1,000 Ibs) raw material
                                       6.0 to 9.0
     For plants consuming between  3,720 kg/day  (8,200 Ibs/day) and 10,430 kg/day
(23,000 Ibs/day) of raw materials the limitations and standards are:

         Suspended Solids               0.40 kg/kkg (lb/1,000 Ibs) raw material
         Oil and Grease                  0.10  kg/kkg (lb/1,000 Ibs) raw material
         pH                            6.0 to 9.0

     Finally for plants using raw material at a rate  greater than 10,430 kg/day (23,000
Ibs/day) the recommended effluent standards are:

         Suspended Solids               0.25 kg/kkg (lb/1,000 Ibs) of raw material
         Oil                            0.063 kg/kkg (lb/1,000 Ibs) of raw material
         pH                            6.0 to 9.0

     For the  best  practicable  control  technology currently available,  no limitation is
proposed for lead.

     For all three subcategories, no  additional reduction is proposed for the limitation and
standards  on suspended  solids  or oil represented by the  best  available technology eco-
nomically achievable (BATEA)  or for new sources coming on-stream after the guidelines are
put into effect.

     However,  for both  the  BATEA  and for new sources, limitations  and standards are
proposed for lead in process waste waters. This limitation applies only to plants producing
hose by the lead-sheathed cure process. For plants consuming less than 3,720 kg/day (8,200
Ibs/day) of raw materials, the standard  is 0.0025  kg/kkg (lb/1,000  Ibs) raw material.  For
plants  consuming  less than  3,720  kg/day  (8,200 Ibs/day)  and 10,430 kg/day (23,000
Ibs/day) of raw materials, the standard  is 0.0015  kg/kkg (lb/1,000  Ibs) raw material.  For
plants consuming more than 10,430 kg/day (23,000 Ibs/day)  of raw materials the standard
is 0.0010 kg/kkg (lb/1,000 Ibs) raw material.

     Process  waste  waters evolved  from the Wet Digestion  Rubber Reclaiming industry
(Category B) are contaminated with BOD, COD,  suspended  solids,  oil and pH. Only  one
plant using this process  is currently  discharging  to navigable  waters  and  this  facility is
employing  a best available treatment economically achievable. Therefore, no limitations or
standards are being proposed for the best practicable control technology currently available.
Limitations and standards for the best  available treatment economically achievable are as
follows:

         BOD                          1.20 kg/kkg (lb/1,000 Ibs) of product
         COD                          6.11 kg/kkg (lb/1,000 Ibs) of product
         Suspended Solids               2.31 kg/kkg (lb/1,000 Ibs) of product
         Oil                            0.58 kg/kkg (lb/1,000 Ibs) of product
         pH                            6.0 to 9.0

                                        A-3

-------
     It is recommended that  no new reclaimed rubber sources using the Wet  Digestion
process  be permitted to come  on-stream.  Reasonable alternatives to the Wet  Digestion
process  are the pan, dry digester, or mechanical processes. These processes generate a less
contaminated waste water and, according to industry  spokesmen, are economically more
favorable.

     Process waste  waters evolved  from the Pan, Dry Digestion  or Mechanical Rubber
Reclaiming industry  (Category C) should be treated and monitored  for suspended solids,
oil and pH. Proposed limitations and standards for the  best practicable control technology
currently available are based on raw material usage and are as follows:

         Suspended Solids               0.192 kg/kkg (lb/1,000 Ibs) raw material
         Oil                            0.144 kg/kkg (lb/1,000 Ibs) raw material
         pH                            6.0 to 9.0

No  additional reduction is proposed for the limitations represented by the best available
technology economically achievable or for new sources coming on-stream after the guide-
lines are put into effect.

     Contaminants in the process waste waters evolved from latex-dipped, latex-thread and
latex-molding operations (Category D Type 1) should be controlled and treated  for BOD,
suspended solids, oil, chromium, and pH. The proposed limitations and standards for the
best practicable control technology currently available are:

         BOD                          2.20 kg/kkg (lb/1,000 Ibs) of latex solids
         Suspended Solids               2.90 kg/kkg (lb/1,000 Ibs) of latex solids
         Oil                            0.73 kg/kkg (lb/1,000 Ibs) of latex solids
         Chromium                     0.0036 kg/kkg (lb/1.000 Ibs) of latex solids
         pH                            6.0 to 9.0

     No  additional  reduction  is  recommended for the limitations represented by the best
available technology economically achievable or for new sources coming on-stream after the
guidelines are put int••> effect.

     Contaminants in process  waste waters evolved from latex foam operations (Category D
Type 2) include BOD, suspended solids, zinc, and pH. The proposed limitations for the best
practicable control technology currently available are as follows:

         BOD                          9.43 kg/kkg  (lb/1,000 Ibs) of latex solids
         Suspended Solids               1.6 kg/kkg (lb/1,000 Ibs) of latex solids
         Zinc                           0.083 kg/kkg (lb/1,000 Ibs) of latex solids
         pH                            6.0 to 9.0
                                         A-4

-------
     Proposed limitations and standards for  the  best  available technology economically
achievable are:

         BOD                          1.41 kg/kkg (lb/1,000 Ibs) of latex solids
         Suspended Solids               0.94 kg/kkg (lb/1,000 Ibs) of latex solids
         pH                            6.0 to 9.0

     As of the submittal  date of this report, no limitations or standards had been developed
for the Polysufide Synthetic Rubber industry.
     Reference: Development Document for Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards
of Performance; Rubber Processing Industry Phase II.
                                        A-5

-------
 imiNICALKI-TORT
     IMTA PACJI
                           I.  Keport No.
                               EPA-230-1-73-024
3. Recipient's Accession No.
 4. Tillc .md Subtitle
  Economic Analysis of Proposed Effluent Guidelines -
  The Rubber Processing Industry
                                                                             S. Report Date
                                                                             	August 1974
                                                                             6.
                      Kenneth R. Sidman
7 A nl hurls)
 John T. Howarth
') IVrlorminn Organization Name and Address
 Arthur D. Little, Inc.
 Acorn Park
 Cambridge, Mass. 02140
                                                                              8. Performing Organization Rept. No.
                                                                              10. Project/Task/Work Unit No.
                                                                                 Task Order No. 16
                                                                              11. Contract/Grant No.
                                                                                 68-01-1541
 12. Sponsoring Organization Name and Address
 Office of Planning and Evaluation
 Environmental Protection Agency
 Washington, D.C. 20460
                                                                             13. Type of Report & Period Covered
                                                                                Final
                                                                             14.
 15. Supplementary Notes
 16. Abstracts
               An initial analysis of the economic impact of the proposed water effluent guidelines
          upon the Rubber Processing Industry; Rubber Footwear  (SIC 3021), Rubber Reclaim (SIC
          3031), Hose and Belting (SIC 3041), Rubber Products Not Elsewhere Classified (SIC 3069)
          and  Gaskets Packing and Sealing Devices (SIC  3293) and Retread Tires (SIC 7534) was
          performed based on the abatement costs supplied  by EPA. On this basis, 22 plant closings
          are anticipated, or about 1.5% of the non-tire segment of the rubber processing industry, the
          capital investment required for pollution control will  be  $19.5 million. BAT requirements
          apply only to the lead hose process and amounts to $135,000. Annual operating costs will
          be $5.1  million for BPT and $27,000 for BAT.
 17. Key Words and Document Analysis.
 Economic Analysis
 Effluent Guidelines
 Rubber Processing Industry
 Footwear
 Reclaimed Rubber
 Gaskets and Sealing
 Hose and Belting
 17b. Identifiers/Optn-Ended Terms
 Miscellaneous Rubber Products
 Retread Tires
                                I7a. Descriptors
 I7c COSATI Held/Group
 IK. Availability Statement
                                                              19. Security Class (This
                                                                 Report)
                                                                  UNCI.ASSII II I)
                                                              20. Security Class (This
                                                                 Pace)
                                                                  ifNCt.ASSIl II-I)
                                                                                      21. No. of I
                                                                                              71
                                                                                      22. Price
IORM NTIS-.15(RI;V. .1-72)
                                        MJ.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1974 582-413/67  1-3
                                                                                             USCOMM-IX' 14952-1-7 2

-------