United States
                       Environmental Protection
                       Agency
                     Air and Radiation
                     6202J
                                                                   EPA 430-N-95-001 •x"
                                                                   January/February 1995
vvEPA
Green   Lights
Update
                                                                       reen
                                                                     Lights
                                                 New Year's resolu
                                                           h
                      agency
Region 5, Library (PL-12J)
77 West Jackson Boulevard, 12th Floor
Chicago, IL  60601 3600
                           Cherry Hill's Lesson.

                           Showcase Buildings.

                           HID Lamps
                                        j
                           New IRR Minimuni.
                                        t
                           In the Spotlight..,.!...

                           New Participants..!...
                           2  Merck Lends a Hand	y

                           j  Signing Ceremonies	1U

                           4  Green Lights Director Resigns... 11

                           D  Virginia's Streetlights	_LZ

                           /  Implementation Report	J3

                           o  October's Upgrade Reports	13
                    401 M STRKET, SW (6202J), WASHINGTON, DC 20460
                      ENERGY STAR FAX LINE SYSTEM • 202 233-9659
               GREEN LIGHTS/ENERGY STAR HOTLINE 202 775-6650 • FAX 202 775-6680
                 GREEN LIGHTS ALLY HOTLINE 202 293-4527 • FAX 202 223-9534
                                        Recycled/Recyclable
                                        Printed with Soy/Canola Ink on paper tha
                                        contains at least 50% recycled fiber

-------
     GREEN LIGHTS UPDATE, JANUARY/FEBRUARY 1995
     Cherry Hill School  District
     Gets  a  Lesson  in "Free"  Upgrades
        The Cherry Hill (NJ) Board
     of Education joined Green
     Lights in 1992, becoming the
     first school district. This Green
     Lights Partner has learned a lot
     about creative financing in the
     course of completing a $2.8 mil-
     lion upgrade of its 20 facilities
     in February 1994 without appro-
     priating a cent out of its budget.
        The New Jersey State
     Conservation Fund provided a
     $285,000 grant, but Al Keleher,
     Green Lights Implementation
     Director for the Cherry Hill
     School Board, knew that the
     district had to look for  third-
     party financing or a shared
formance contract with SYCOM,
a Green Lights Lighting
Management Company Ally.
SYCOM has already surveyed
and upgraded the lighting in
Cherry Hill's 1.5 million square
feet of school facilities. As part
of its performance contract,
SYCOM will group-relamp three
times and supply all the lamps
and ballasts needed for group-
and spot-relamping until the
contract ends in 2002—with no
out-of-pocket expense to the
Cherry Hill Board of Education.
   As with most performance
contracts, Cherry Hill will  pay
SYCOM a percentage of the mea-
ACCN
TYPE
1 CALLNO
\RN
,,'MTI
NOTES
DB
LOCATION
MYDATE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
 SNAPSHOT: CHERRY HILL
    lamps wish c
-------
                                                          GREEN LIGHTS UPDATE, JANUARY/FEBRUARY 1995
Introducing  the  Energy Star
Showcase  Buildings  Series
   With the introduction of the
Energy Star Showcase Buildings
initiative on June 16, 1994, the
U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency laid the groundwork
for the expected 1995 launch
of the Energy Star Buildings
program—a staged approach
to achieving comprehensive,
energy-efficient upgrades in
commercial buildings. To share
the progress of these Showcase
projects, the Update will feature
a monthly column that reports
on the results of the Showcase
Buildings participants as they
implement each stage of
the program.
   In 1994, 24 Green Lights
participants agreed to join the
Energy Star Showcase Buildings
initiative by committing one of
their facilities (representing a
cross-section of building types
throughout  the country) to serve
as a case study for this staged-
approached program.  With 1
year to complete the upgrades,
        each Showcase Buildings partici-
        pant will aim to implement each
        of the program's five stages one
        at a time, evaluating each
        stage's impact on energy savings
        before proceeding to the next
        step. EPA expects that partici-
        pants will realize savings of up
        to 40 percent in overall energy
        usage while achieving an inter-
        nal rate of return of at least
        prime rate plus 6 percent.
           Like Green Lights, the
        Buildings program will be a vol-
        untary partnership between EPA
        and private and public institu-
        tions to reduce energy usage
        and,  thereby, air pollution asso-
        ciated with electricity genera-
        tion. Although the Buildings
        program will follow the same
        profit-based strategy as Green
        Lights, the program utilizes a
        broader scope of energy-effi-
        cient upgrades. Each of the pro-
        gram's five  stages (outlined
        below) serves as a building
        block, with one stage having  an
                                                                impact on the implementation
                                                                and results of succeeding stages.
                                                                For example, it is rarely eco-
                                                                nomical to upgrade the HVAC
                                                                plant (Stage 5) unless significant
                                                                effort is made in prior stages to
                                                                reduce cooling load.
                                                                   To document energy savings
                                                                at each step, a special measure-
                                                                ment and verification process
                                                                has been set up. Documentation
                                                                includes building baseline ener-
                                                                gy use segmented by major
                                                                loads. Peak energy use by load
                                                                and peak  air-conditioning cool-
                                                                ing loads are also measured.
                                                                The March Update will elaborate
                                                                on the measurement and verifi-
                                                                cation process. To learn more
                                                                about the Energy Star Buildings
                                                                and Showcase programs, call the
                                                                Green Lights/Energy Star Hotline
                                                                at 202 775-6650. Pi
      Stage 1
    Green Lights
Stage 2
Building
Tune-up
                                         HVAC Load
                                         Reductions
This staged approach provides
a broad strategic framework for making comprehensive
efficiency upgrades in a range of commercial building types.
   Improved
  Fans and Air-
Handling Systems
  Improved
Heating and
Cooling Plant

-------
GREEN LIGHTS UPDATE, JANUARY/FEBRUARY 1995
HID  Lamps:  A  Bright Idea for
Outdoor and  Indoor Lighting
   High-intensity discharge
(HID) lamps provide effective
lighting in a wide range of
applications. HIDs, consisting of
an arc tube and outer bulb, are
popular because of their high
efficiency and long life. The arc
tube, where light generates, is a
point source that enables the
light to be projected in a con-
trolled  beam (.e.g., spot lighting).
While the outer bulb mainly
protects the arc tube, an outer
coating can be applied to dif-
fuse the light for a less focused,
"softer" glow.
   Two HID lamp types—high
pressure sodium (HPS) and
metal halide (MH)—have vary-
ing wattages and color proper-
ties and are recommended for
replacing inefficient incandes-
cent, fluorescent, and mercury
vapor (MV) lamps. The follow-
ing discussion of HPS and MH
lamps and  the tables below and
on page 5 will assist you in
specifying HID upgrades.
                                   High Pressure
                                  Sodium Lamps

                                   The most efficient
                                of HIDs, HPS lamps are
                                widely used in outdoor
                                lighting applications,
                                such as roadways, park-
                                ing lots,  and walkways.
                                Their light is also aes-
                                thetically pleasing for
                                lighting building facades
                                and provides effective
                                area lighting around
                                buildings for security.
                                But standard HPS lamps
                                have poor color render-
                                ing. Interior spaces
                                where color rendering
                                is unimportant, such as
                                warehouses and other  storage
                                areas,  make excellent applica-
                                tions for standard HPS  lighting.
                                For areas where color  rendition
                                is important, a  color-corrected
                                version has been developed;
                                however, it is less efficient than
                                standard HPS lamps.
  Performance Variables
                                 HPS
   MH
                             30-40/32-80/70-130f
                           2,800/2,200/1,900-2,100f
                              70-80/65-70/18-25f
                                10,000-24,000+
                                1,935-126,000
                           35-100/70-400/35-1,OOOf
                                    4-6
Efficacy (lumens/watt)*
Color Temperature (Kelvin)
Color Rendering Index
Rated Life (hours)
Average Rated Lumens
Lamp Wattage Range
Start to Full Output (minutes)
Restrike Time (minutes)                 I
*HBeacy is based on average lumens.
fThe three values for HPS represent whtte,cofor-correctetf,and standard lamps, respectively.
Performance charaetertsfics vary for clear and coated lamps. See manufacturer literature for specific data
  40-110
 3,200-5,600
   62-92
5,000-20,000
1,900-130,000
  32-1,650
    2-5
   10-20
    MV
    Retrofit HPS lamps. Designed
to work on MV ballasts, these
special HPS lamps cut electric
usage about 14 percent while
providing up to twice the light
output of existing MV systems, at
minimal initial cost. HPS retrofit
lamps are available to replace
175- to 1,000-watt MV lamps.
               Check with lamp
               and ballast man-
               ufacturers for
               compatibility.
                  "Energy-saving"
               HPS lamps. These
               relatively new
               lamps use ad-
               vanced technolo-
               gy to reduce
               energy consump-
               tion up to 8 per-
               cent while
    25-50
 3,300-4,300
    22-62
12,000-24,000+
 1,000-50,000
  75-1,000
     2-5
    3-10

-------
                                                              GREEN LIGHTS UPDATE, JANUARY/FEBRUARY 1995
       | w  Replace incandescent,
           fluorescent, and MV
           systems with energy-
           efficient HPS or HH
           systems.
       [• Replace 250-to 1,000-
           watt MV lamps with
           special HPS or MH
           retrofit lamps.
       I • Use standard HPS for
           maximum efficiency if
           color rendition is not
           critical.
       | • Replace 250- and 400-
           watt HPS lamps with  225-
           and 360-watt HPS lamps.
           Use occupancy sensors to
           control instant-restrike or
           bi-level dimming HPS or
           MH systems.
providing the same light output as
standard HPS lamps. Energy-saving
225- and 360-watt HPS lamps can
replace 250- and 400-watt standard
HPS lamps, respectively, and can
be used on existing HPS ballasts.
       White high pressure sodium
    (WHPS) lamps. Developed to
    provide more efficient light-
    ing for retail spaces, WHPS
    lamps provide excellent
    color rendering and light
    similar to that of incandes-
    cents; however, they are less
    efficient than standard or
    color-corrected HPS lamps.

     Metal Halide Lamps

       MH  lamps are an excel-
    lent alternative to fluores-
    cent  lighting for high
    efficiency and good color
    rendering. These  lamps can
    be clear or have a phosphor
    coating applied to the exte-
    rior bulb that improves  a
lamp's color properties.
    Due to their high color ren-
dering capability, MH lamps can
be used in many  interior appli-
cations, including office spaces.
MH lamps are excellent for high
 ceiling applications such as lob-
 bies and atriums. In manufactur-
 ing spaces, MH systems can
 replace very-high-output (VHO)
 fluorescent systems. In retail
 environments, lower wattage
 MH lamps offer excellent beam
 control for effective accent light-
 ing. Exterior applications
 include sports facility, building
 facade, walkway, roadway, and
 parking lot lighting; however,  if
 color rendering is not critical,
 use  high-efficiency HPS lamps.
    For retrofit applications, spe-
 cially designed MH lamps can
 replace MV lamps and operate
 on existing MV ballasts; 325-,
 400-, and 950-watt MH lamps
 are available. Retrofitting with
 these MH lamps will increase
 color rendition, produce energy
 savings of up to 20 percent, and
 increase light output up to 100
 percent. Check with lamp and
 ballast manufacturers for com-
 patibility. Rl
                  Other  Design  Consideration for  HID  Lamps
 CONSIDERATION
REASON FOR
CONSIDERATION
DESIGN SOLUTION
 All HID lamps require time to warm
 up to full brightness and restrike
 (following a momentary power
 interruption)

 Consider bi-level dimming between
 high (full) and low (
-------
  GREEN LIGHTS UPDATE, JANUARY/FEBRUARY 1995
  Green Lights  Raises Expectations  for  Upgrade
  Profitability:  New  20  Percent  Minimum  for  IRR
V
     "We're changing our own
     profitability test today,"
     announced Maria Tikoff,
        Director of the Green
        Lights program. The
       test used to calculate
     \ lighting upgrade prof-
       itability is the internal
rate of return (IRR), which indi-
cates what percentage of an
organization's investment will be
recovered annually  through
energy cost savings.
   Until now, an upgrade pro-
ject was considered profitable—
a requirement under the Green
Lights Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU)—if its IRR
equaled or surpassed the prime
rate plus 6 percentage points.
The new profitability test, which
takes effect immediately,  is a
straight IRR of 20 percentage
points. Thus, Green Lights
Partners will commit to install
upgrades that maximize energy
savings only if the IRR for the
total upgrade package equals or
exceeds 20 percentage points
(and no class of individual mea-
sures within the total package
fails to equal or exceed  an IRR
of 12 percentage points).

What  Effect Will This
Have on Savings?
    The change in the profitabil-
ity test makes sense  for  a num-
ber of  reasons.  Lighting
technology improvements,
decreasing upgrade costs,  and
the rich set of alternatives avail-
able have made Green Lights
upgrades increasingly lucrative.
"With the average completed
upgrade reducing electricity
usage by 50 percent and earning
an average rate of return of over
40 percent, it is clear that partic-
ipants are meeting the goals of
pollution prevention and prof-
itability simultaneously. Raising
the hurdle rate acknowledges
their success," says Bob
Kwartin,  former Director of
Green Lights.

A Profitable Change
    Despite this trend,  some
prospective participants have
been reluctant to join Green
Lights while there was the
potential for project IRR to fall
as low as prime  plus 6 percent-
age points. "We have listened to
              continued on page 7
                            Upgrade Options Analyzed Using ProjectKalc

Lamp
Ballast
Fixture
Lamps/Fixture
Controls
Other
Operating hrs/yr
No. of Fixtures
IRR
NPV
kWh/yr Savings
kW Reduction
kWh/yr Reduced
% Energy Savings
Light Level(fc)
VCP
BASE
F40T-I2
2-lamp Eff. Mag.
2x4 lensed
4
Wall Switch
	
3,500
100
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
65
60
                                             OPTION I
                                               F32T-8
                                             4-lamp Elec.
                                             2x4 Parabolic
                                                 2
                                            WUI Mount O.S,
                                          Task Light (13WCFL)
                                               2,300
                                                100
                                                20%
                                                 $0
                                               $3,475
                                                9.5
                                               40,935
                                                71%
                                          32Ambtentf52w/Task
                                                 82
                                                               ' OPTION 1 • •
                                                              ,   f MT*  ''
                                                                3-lamp Elec.
                                                                 Existing
                                                                    3
                                                               WaliMoufttQ.S.
                                                                  2,300
                                                                   100
                                                 OPTION 3
                                                  F32T-8
                                                4-lamp Elec.-75%
                                                  Existing
                                                    4
                                                 Wall Switch
                                                   3,500
                                                    100
                                                                                     $4,605
                                                                                     $2,093
                                                                                      6.5
                                                                                     22,750
                                                                                      40%
                                                                                      50
                                                                                      70
      The above analysis is based on an office building comprised of 50 individual offices. Each office is 10'xlO' with an 8' high ceiling and contains two 2x4 fluorescent troffers
      and a wall switch (or occupancy sensor where specified). In addition, each office has one task location, thus would require one task light Cost assumptions are as follows:
                                              Material Costs: Lamps: F40 T-12 $ 1.48; F32 T-8 $2 00
                                                        Ballasts- Eff. Mag. $ 16.00,4-lamp Elec. $20.00, 3-lamp Elec. $19.00,
                                                          4-lampElec.-75%$2I.OO
       Electricity Rate: $0.08/kWh
       Labor Rate: Installation: $25.00/hr, Maintenance: $ 15.00/hr
       Inflation Rate: Electricity 2%, Labor and Materials 3%
          NPV/IRR Analysis Term- 20 yrs
          NPV Analysis Based on 20% Discount Rate
                                                      Parabolic Lummaire with lamps and ballast: $55.00
                                                      Task Light with I 3-watt Compact Fluorescent (CFL): $45.00
                                                      Wall Mount Occupancy Sensor (O.S) $55.00

-------
                                                            GREEN LIGHTS UPDATE, JANUARY/FEBRUARY 1995
               faS  cf tile Ibwn
                                          are finding
               creative ways to promote their participa-
                                         on products  •
               and packaging, producing employee edu-
               ;
           :4e^
         emulation?
               attention, ;pr
   Thg lljohnspn & Johns/on/itctliiy managers display their-awards fdllourfng the
   ceremony, With thgru f---'*-^^-™'-*'• >•-•&--•--" ^*-irn.*.^as^i^f* ••-.•:.••••• - ••
                                                                          :f)^
                                                                               the last 5-10
                                                                      "•'•/-"We rec6^iie
-------
GREEN LIGHTS UPDATE, JANUARY/FEBRUARY 1995
    Green  Lights  Welcomes
    New  Participants
       Forty-six new participants joined Green      ship reach 1,600,
   Lights in October to take advantage of the           Green Lights welcomes its new participants
   benefits of energy-efficient lighting upgrades.     and looks .forward to working with them. If
   Ranging front hospitals and schools to televi-     your organization, would like raqre information
   sion stations and motorcycle manufacturers,      about :the program, please call the Green
   these new participants are helping, member-  •    - Lights^nergy_.Sttr=H0Jj'Me'atf202;775-665<)., •
                                       Partners (30)
          American Association for the Advancement of Science • City of JBaltimOfe, MD  •
         Beckwith Electric Company r Inc. II Bellsouth Cellular Corporation • Carondelet St.
         Mary's Hospital • Cubic Defense Systems • Darling Store Fixtures • Defiance City
          Schools .• East Maine School District #63 • Embassy of the Netherlands • Fisons
           Corporation • Frederick Memorial Hospital  • Gilbert Engineering • .Goodwill
         Industries • Harley-Davidson, Inc. • Hebrew Home & Hospital • jftood College •
        Intermountain Health Care • 'ICeniiesaw State College; -•• La Porte HofpiM,:l|'.punrMon:oftbe Update, Jfadmson Consume Electronics, Inc.,
            was mis$peli04 in the ttst of mew Partners, -Sfy,., fert«i
-------
                                                            GREEN LIGHTS UPDATE, JANUARY/FEBRUARY 1995
At Merck,  Employees
Lend  a  Green Hand
    At Merck & Co., Inc.,
employees have lent a hand in
lighting upgrades at its
Whitehouse Station, NJ, head-
quarters. In June 1993, 28
employees—from vice presi-
dents to clerical staff—stayed
after-hours to assist with
upgrades in the employee cafe-
teria.  While enjoying pizza,
sodas, and snacks and getting to
know one another, these volun-
teers retrofitted 1,000  lamps in 4
hours. In July 1994, 22 volun-
teers retrofitted 400 lamps on
the executive floor level.
    As a result of these and other
successful team  exercises,
employees helped Merck, a
Green Lights Partner since
January  1994, complete lighting
upgrades in its 1 million square
foot facility in less than 9 months.
According to Jerry Pentlicky,
Project Engineer, the payback
period on these projects is very
short since the only installation
cost is the price of a light meal. A
side benefit is that the pharma-
ceutical firm's employees like
being part of the solution and
participating in these team efforts.
   Completed in 1992 (con-
struction began in 1988) with
the latest energy conservation
systems, the Whitehouse Station
facility also exemplifies potential
upgrade opportunities for newer
facilities. One of the facility's
best energy-efficiency opportu-
nities involved replacing ineffi-
cient lamps and, where needed,
fixture trim rings. However, with
a maintenance staff of only 28
to deal with everyday facility
needs, Pentlicky knew it could
be months before he could
retrofit 5,000 fixtures without
outside help, which would add
to installation costs and delay
                                                     Sharon
                                                     Witkowski
                                                     and Andy
                                                     Turnbull (I)
                                                     and Mike Bill
                                                     and Teri
                                                     Kaminski (r)
                                                     apply team-
                                                     work
                                                     approach in
                                                     replacing
                                                     incandescent
                                                     lamps with
                                                     compact fluo-
                                                     rescents in
                                                     Merck's
                                                     Whitehouse
                                                     Station
                                                     employee
                                                     cafeteria.
  SNAPSHOT: MERCK & Co., INC.
  •  Retrofitted 5,000+ incandes-
     cent highhat fixtures with
     compact fluorescent lamps
  •  Lighting load reduction: 396
     kilowatts
  •  Energy savings: 1.6 million
     kilowatt-hours (based on
     lighting load reduction)
  •  Upgrade costs: $225,000
  •  Rebates (Utility Ally,
     Public Service Electric
     & Gas): $53,000
  •  Energy cost savings (I st
     year): $400,000+

the energy savings.  While  the
maintenance staff dealt with fix-
tures requiring complete
upgrades, Pentlicky developed a
plan—which management sup-
ported—to get volunteers from
the In-Site Services  (facilities
management)  Group to work
after-hours unscrewing the old
lamps and installing the  new.
    Merck's  headquarters already
utilizes motion sensors and
high-efficiency motors, pumps,
and generators on its  heating,
ventilating, and air-conditioning
systems. As  part of  its continu-
ing energy-efficiency efforts,
Merck also plans to purchase
Energy Star Computers in the
future.  In  the interim, Merck will
utilize the teamwork approach
to install computer keyboard
devices that will shut  down
monitors when there is no key-
board or mouse activity, fi

-------
GREEN LIGHTS UPDATE, JANUARY/FEBRUARY 1995
Three  Signing  Ceremonies
Emphasize  Green Lights  Benefits
   Three Eastern U.S. cities
were among six new Partners to
join Green Lights at signing cer-
emonies in Maryland and
Pennsylvania:

Annapolis, MD
   August 15, 1994: The City of
Annapolis, Historic Inns of
Annapolis, Loews Annapolis
Hotel, and the United States
Naval Academy joined more than
50 Maryland-based organizations
already saving money, preventing
pollution, and improving lighting.

Baltimore, MD
   August 15, 1994: "I am
proud to be part of a program
that makes City government
more cost-effective and
improves the quality of life for
our employees through better
lighting, but one that protects
the environment as well," said
Mayor Kurt L. Schmoke. "In
today's climate of nonstop envi-
ronmental threats,  energy-effi-
cient lighting is a major step
forward in restoring our planet's
health."

Pittsburgh, PA
   October 25, 1994: With Mayor
Tom Murphy's signature, Pittsburgh
joined more than 100 Penn-
sylvania-based Green Lights parti-
cipants. "This program represents a
commitment to treat lighting as an
investment opportunity rather than
an overhead cost," said Daniel J.
Desmond, executive director of
the Pennsylvania Energy
Office. "More than any
other technology at
hand, lighting is one
area where savings
are virtual-
ly certain."
At the Annapolis Signing Ceremony (I to
r) Mayor Alfred A Hopkins; Peter
Kostamayer, EPA Regional Administrator;
Paul Pearson, Historic Inns of Annapolis,
Thomas A Negri, General Manager of
Loews Annapolis Hotel; and Captain B.C.
Wallace, Acting Chief of Staff of the US
Naval Academy.
                   Daniel J Desmond (I) and
                   Bob Kwartin, Green Lights
                     Program Director (r), sit
                 beside Mayor Tom Murphy as
                 he signs the Memorandum of
                   Understanding Pittsburgh
                   and EPA officials look on
10

-------
                                                GREEN LIGHTS UPDATE, JANUARY/FEBRUARY 1995
-r^--
SuW**
    »»--~~
  *•:££$*
 SSS^V-
  ssstf-
  fiogf*'
   tfisr^
                                                          ^r 3,
    ^s>-j
     »^*?C!U'
     *^?r^*
              •ssw**'  .
               u^^J
                s2s»
                G*.«^
                Se^^t
                 tf-*-
                 «s
                  vA*V*^t,
                  ?ftf«-

                            gn** *— EP                      d !,ve a^^ f* ^c
                              i>ttaiwe rC **^                           . . -_ Artil
Director of 'Greem Lights Resigns
   When Bob Kwartin, founder of                    launched the Green Lights Update on April

11, 1991, he expressed EPA's delight at' having 99 participants in this voluntary, nonregulatory, energy-

efficiency initiative. As Kwartin moves on from his role as Director of the Green Lights program, EPA is

extremely delighted to have more than 1,600 Partners, Allies, and Endorsers taking advantage of the

program Kwartin helped create and shape over the past 4 years. He  chose to say farewell to one and all

in his own words above. EPA and the  Update are grateful to Bob Kwartin for his tremendous efforts in

support of Green Lights and wish him well in all future endeavors. Pi
                                                                            11

-------
GREEN LIGHTS IMPLEMENTATION  REPORT CODES
       Facility Type
 1000  Office"
 1001  Warehouse
 1002  Industrial • Manufacturing
 1003  Retail sales
 1004  Healthcare
 1005  Lodging (hotels, dormitories etc )
 1006  Assembly (churches, auditoriums, etc.)
 1007  Education (classrooms)
 1008  Food sales and service
 1009  Parking Garage
 1010  Laboratory
 1011  Outdoor

       Fixture Type
    13  Fluorescent- commercial- no lens
    14  Fluorescent- commercial-clear lens
    15  Fluorescent- commercial-translucent lens
    16  Fluorescent - deep cell louver
    17  Fluorescent - small cell louver
    18  Fluorescent- industrial-open fixture
    19  Fluorescent- industrial-enclosed fixture
    20  Incandescent- downlight ("can")
    21  Incandescent-spotlight/floodlight
    22  Incandescent-decorative/sconce
    23  Incandescent-pendant fixture
    24  Incandescent-general illumination
    25  Incandescent-exterior/landscape
    26  Incandescent - track lighting
    27  HID-outdoor-cobra head
    28  HID-outdoor-shoe box
    29  HID-outdoor-wallpak/flood
    30  HID-outdoor-landscape
    31  HID-outdoor-sports lighting
    32  HID-indoor-high bay
    33  HID-indoor-low bay
    34  HID-indoor-recessed commercial
    35  HID-indoor-sports lighting
    36  Exit sign-incandescent
    37  Exit sign-fluorescent
    38  Exitsign-LED
    39  Exit sign-electroluminescent
    40  Exit sign- tritium
    41  Exit sign- luminescent
    42  Indirect

       Installation by
 2030  in-house staff
 2031  contractor
 2032  utility
   Lamp Type
54 T-8
55 T-10
56 T-12 Energy Saving
57 T-12 Cathode cut-out
58 T-12 High Lumen
59 T-12 Standard
60 T-12 High Output (SOOma)
61 T-12VHO(1500ma)
62 T-17VHO(1500ma)
63 T-5 single ended
64 Compact tw in-tube
65 Compact quad-tube
66 Compact-integrated ballast
67 Compact-circular
68 Incandescent-general service (A, PS,T)
69 Incandescent-Reflector (R, PAR, ER)
70 Incandescent-decorative
71 Halogen-general service
72 Halogen-reflector (R,PAR, MR)
73 Halogen-tubular
74 HID-mercury vapor
75 HID-metal halide
76 HID-high pressure sodium
77 HID-white-HPS
78 Low pressure sodium
79 T-12 Slimline

   Ballast Type
80 Fluorescent-old standard magnetic
81 Fluorescent-efficient magnetic
82 Fluorescent-hybrid/cathode cutout
83 Fluorescent-standard electronic
84 Fluorescent-integrated electronic
85 Fluorescent-extended output electronic
86 Fluorescent-partial output electronic
87 Fluorescent-dimming electronic
88 Fluorescent-step dimming electronic
89 Fluorescent-HO standard magnetic
90 Fluorescent-HO (SOOma) electronic
91 Fluorescent-VHO standard magnetic
92 Fluorescent-compact magnetic
93 Fluorescent-compact electronic
94 HID-magnetic
95 HID-electronic
96 Fluorescent-HO efficient magnetic
97 Fluorescent-VHO efficient magnetic
     Upgrade Type
 110 Relamp only
 111 Delamp only
 112 Relamp and reballast
 113 Specular reflector delamp
 114 Reflector Reballast
 115 New Lens Reflector Reballast
 116 New lens'louver
 117 New fixture
 118 Convert Incand. to Fluorescent or HID
 119 Task Lighting

     Control Type
 100 Manual switching
 101 Manual dimming
 102 Occupancy sensor
 103 Timed switching
 104 Timed dimming
 105 Daylight switching
 106 Daylight dimming
 107 Panel level dimming
 108 Panel level EMS
 109 Power reducer

     Survey/Analysis by
2010 in-house personnel
2011 independent consultant
2012 electrical contractor
2013 utility representative
2014 equipment supplier
2015 lighting management company
2016 energy services company
2017 Green Lights Surveyor Ally
2018 Architect
2019 Lighting Designer
2024 Electrical Distributor

     Equipment Provided by
2020 lighting equipment supplier
2021 lighting management company
2022 utility
2023 contractor

     Financing by
2040 internal funds
2041 conventional loan
2042 utility
2043 lease/'lease-purchase
2044 shared savings
2045 other
   POLLUTION PREVENTION
      You ma> want to estimate the
      pollution pre\ention of this
      project for your own use Use the
      following formulas and factors:
C02  kWhyr    x
      saved
SO2  kWh'yr    x
      saved
NOx:  kWh-yr    x
      saved
emission  =
factor
emission  =
factor
emission  =
factor
Ibsyr

g;yr

g/yr
  EPA Regional Emission Factors (see note below)
REGION 1: CT, MA, ME, NH, RI, VT
Emission per      CO2      SO2  NOx
kWh saved:         11      4.0    1.4
REGION 2: NJ, NY, PR, VI
Emission per      CO2     SO2   NOx
kWh saved:         1.1      3.4    13
REGION 3: DC, DE, MD, PA, VA, WV
Emission per      CO2     SO2   NOx
kWh saved:         1.6      8.2    2.6
REGION 4: AL, FL, GA, KY, MS, NC, SC, TN
Emission per      CO2     SO2  NOx
kWh saved:         1.5      6.9    2.5
REGION 5: IL, IN, MI, MN, OH, WI
Emission per      CO2     SO2   NOx
kWh saved:         1.8     10.4    3.5
REGION 6- AR, LA, NM, OK, TX
Emission per      CO2     SO2   NOx
kWh saved:         1.7      2.2    2.5
REGION 7: IA, KS, MO, NE
Emission per      CO2      SO2   NOx
kWh saved:        2.0       8.5    3.9
REGION 8: CO, MT, ND, SD, UT, WY
Emission per      CO2     SO2   NOx
kWh saved:         2.2      3.3    3.2
REGION 9: AZ, CA, HI, NV, Guam, Am Samoa
Emission per      CO2      SO2   NOx
kWh saved:         1.0       1.1    15
REGION 10: AK, ID, OR, WA
Emission per      CO2      SO2   NOx
kWh saved         01      0.5    03
     Note: State pollution emission factors are
    aggregated by EPA region. Factors for U.S
  territories are national average emission factors
  See the Green Lights Lighting Upgrade Manual
 ige2of 6200 1,9 '3CX94)

-------
                                                                            GREEN LIGHTS UPDATE, JANUARY/FEBRUARY 1995
 Upgrade  Projects  Reported  in   October
 The following program participants  submitted implementation reports on lighting upgrades during October.
 Completed Upgrades
 American Broadcasting Companies, Inc.,
     Andrew Pucher
 Bacharach Rehabilitation Hospital,
     Ellis H Otto
 Baldor Electric Company, Ron Reid
 Bank of Hawaii, John Hashizume
 Boeing, Fay Weaver
 CIBA-GEIGY, Lawrence Kunz
 Centocor, Inc., SamuelP Doria
 Claywest House, Inc , Jon L Simcoke
 Colonial Pipeline, Art Neubauer
 Dean Witter Realty, Hy Mitrani
 Halliburton Company, Bradford D Moore
 Hewlett-Packard Co , Robert Lanning
 Honeywell, Inc., William P Sikute
 Howard County, Maryland, Michael Kelly
 Integrated Power £ Lites, Bryan McLain
 JE Seagram Corporation, Bert Poirier
 Jantzen, Inc , Scott Perry
 Kenyon Oil Company, John A Olival
 Keycorp, Michael J Walsh
 Kirby Risk Supply Company, Lisa Jo Layton
 Leon County, Florida, Jeff Greene
 Louis Dreyfus Property Group, Theodore Sakkos
 Marine Midland Bank, Donald J Jones
 Meadowwood Hospital, Rick Earles
 Merck & Company - World Headquarters,
     George F DeNardo
 Montgomery County, Maryland, Homeira Razavi
 New York Life Insurance & Annuity Corp.,
     Thomas F Carney
 Nike,  Inc., Jim Petsche
 Northern Arizona University, Mark Flynn
 Pacific Gas & Electric, Wilson Wood
 Peerless Lighting Corp , Guy Esberg
 Rochester Community School Corporation,
     Orv Huffman
 Self-Powered Lighting, Inc , Dalbert Benoit
 Shgo Adventist School, Kenneth Gail
 Southern Company Services, Inc ,
     Grover C Worthmgton
 Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA), R Craig
     Smith
 The City of Georgetown, Texas Utility,  Leon
     Henderson
 The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company,
    Allen A Moff
 Trojan, Inc , Dennis Duzyk
 US Lamp, Randall Johnson
 Union Camp Corporation, Ray Scholten
 University of Missouri at Columbia, MarkK, Gulp
Warner Technologies,  Thomas Hathaway
Wellington Sears Company, T Halliburton Wood
Westin Hotels & Resorts, Gus Newbury
Westinghouse Electric Company,
    James P Brennan
Wisconsin Electric Power, Patty Galante
 Upgrade Progress Reports
 ANR Pipeline Company, Stephen Hudik
 Alta Bates Medical Center, Joseph Rieger
 Arc Electric Company, Bill Bates
 Ashland Oil, Inc , Michael J  Vogt
 Bacharach Rehabilitation Hospital, Ellis H Otto
 Baldor Electric Company, Ron Reid
 Bank of Hawaii, John Hashizume
 Boeing, Fay Weaver
 CIBA-GEIGY, Lawrence Kunz
 Carrier Corporation North America,
     Charles Veley
 Centocor, Inc , Samuel P Dona
 Charming Shoppes, Inc , Richard Carinci
 Chase Manhattan Corporation, Edward J O'Shea
 City University of New York, Jerold Marnier
 Claywest House, Inc , Jon L Simcoke
 Club Corporation, International, Michael Quimbey
 Colonial Pipeline, Art Neubauer
 Columbia Lighting, Inc ,  Kevin Clark
 Continental Lighting  Services, Inc.,
     Chester Sokolowski
 Darlme Store Fixtures, Danny White
 Davenport Community School Distnct. Bill Good
 Dean Witter Realty, Hy Mitrani
 Digital Equipment Corporation, David Stone
 ESCO International, Rohyn Meyer
 Epson Portland Inc ,  Randy McEvers
 First Maryland Bancorp, David W Richardson
 Fitzpatrick Electric Supply. Ron Yager
 Gibson Speno Companies, Alan L Haag
 Grainger, Arshad AH
 Gray's Harbor County PUD *1, Joanne F, Hansen
 Graybar Electric Company, William Trussel
 Hackensack Medical  Center, Andrew] Ryan
 Halliburton Company. Bradford D  Moore
 Hebrew Home & Hospital, William F Baal
 Hewlett-Packard Co , Robert Lanning
 Hoechst Celanese, Eugene A  Thomas
 Howard County, Maryland, Michael Kelly
 Huntsville City Schools. Don Sadler
 INCON Industries, Mark Hudson
 ITT Corporation, William Eisenbrey
 Inland Lighting Supplies, Inc , Sharon Blackburn
 Innovative Lighting Sendees, Steve Factor
 Integrated Power & Lites, Bryan McLain
Johnson Controls, Inc , Kim Kiesgen
 Kennametal Inc , William L  Gregory
 Kenyon Oil Company, John A Ohval
 Keycorp, Michael J  Walsh
 Kirby Risk Supply Company,  Lisa Jo Layton
 Leon County School Board, Fred W Dougherty
 Longs Drug Stores. David Alexander
 Louis Dreyfus Property Group, Theodore Sakkos
 Louisville Resource Conservation Council,
     Walter F Bell
 Lowe's Companies, Inc ,  Frank Patterson
Marine Midland Bank. Donald J Jones
Maytag, Doug Wilson
Meadowwood Hospital, Rick Earles
 Merck & Company - World Headquarters,
     George F DeNardo
 Mercy Memorial Hospital, Hugh McFarlane
 MetalOptics, Inc , Diane Kortis
 Metropolitan Water Rec  Dist /Gr Chicago,
     Lionel Gomberg
 Mobil Corp , Nicholas G Greco
 Montgomery County, Maryland, Homeira Razavi
 NYNEX Corporation, Roy W Deitchman
 National Electric Supply, Tom  Cooper
 Natural  Lighting Company, Connie Bilbrey
 New York Life Insurance & Annuity Corp ,
     Thomas F Carney
 Nike, Inc , Jim Petsche
 Northern Arizona University, Mark Flynn
 Orange  and Rockland Utilities, Fred] Rella
 Orlando Utilities Commission,  David Sailer
 Pacific Gas & Electric, Wilson  Wood
 Peerless Lighting Corp , Guy Esberg
 Provident Life & Accident Insurance Co ,
     Ronald Smith
 Rochester Community School Corporation,
     Orv Huffman
 Roseville City School District, Mark] Schrader
 Sligo Adventist School, Kenneth Gair
 Southern Company Services, Inc.,
     Grover C Worthmgton
 St Charles Medical Center, Michael B Severns
 Standard Electric Supply, Mike Harvey
 TSAO Designs and CSL, John Gardner
 The City of Denver, Colorado,  Darryl Winer
 The City of Georgetown, Texas Utility,
     Leon Henderson
 The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company,
     Allen A Moff
 The State of California, Doug Grandy
 The Washington Times, Joseph  Butler
 Thomas Industries, Inc , Joe Kolarik
 Triad Technologies, John Bagwell
 Tristate Electrical Supply Company, Inc  ,
     Thomas D Kidwell
 Trojan, Inc , Dennis Duzyk
 Two Town Center Associates, Don Sutton
 UNISYS  Corporation, Oscar D  Smith
 US Lamp, Randall Johnson
 USX/US  Steel Group, Roy] Weiskircher
 Union Camp Corporation, Ray Scholten
 Union Electric Company, Thomas E Siedhoff
 University of Michigan Hospitals,
     Thomas J Ouvry
 University of Rochester, Patricia Beaumont
 WF Harris Lighting, John Riggan
 Warner Technologies, Thomas  Hathaway
Warner-Lambert, Dan Patterson
Western  Financial Savings Bank, Jim Hedge
Westin Hotels & Resorts,  Gus Newbury
Westinghouse Electric Company,
    James P Brennan
Wholesale Electric Supply Company,
    Richard T Lathrop
Wisconsin Electric Power, Patty Galante
                                          Mercer University, David Sims  ., _   _
                                                                      U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency
                                                                                 Library (PU2J)
                                                                                                    1'12th
                                                                                                                         15

-------
                U.S. EPA Green  Lights -
                           LIGHTING UPGRADE WORKSHOPS
2'12-Day Workshops Featuring:
  	 _Teen
  ^ Lights
  Lighting Upgrade Technologies
  Lighting Analysis Software
  Project Planning and Management
  Financing Options and Analysis
  Green Lights Reporting
  Lighting Maintenance and Disposal
  Surveyor Ally Exam (on third day)

Name
                           Preregistration Form: Green Lights workshops
                           are free and open to the public. Space is limited,
                           however, and priority will be given to Green
                           Lights Partners. Complete details and instruc-
                           tions will be faxed to preregistrants within 4
                           weeks of the workshop date.

                                        Title
Register by Phone: Call the Green
Lights/Energy Star Hotline at 202 775-6650
Register by Fax:  Fax this form to the Lighting
Services Groups at 202 775-6680
Register by Mail:  Mail to EPA Green Lights
(6202J),40I M Street, SW.Washington, DC 20460
Gty
pany/Organization
ress

ie ( )
area code
js (Please check one)


State
Fax
Q Partner Q Ally


ZIP Code
Attendee fax number is very important
to expedite the processing of this form.
Q Surveyor Ally Candidate G Other
Please Indicate Preferred Workshop*:
Q Atlanta, GA January 9-1 I         Q Little Rock, AR March 1-3        Q Chicago, IL May 2-4
Q Los Angeles, CA January 17-9    Q Dallas,TX March 15-17
*Please call 202 862-1 145 for current workshop information The Surveyor Ally exam will be given on the morning of Day 3 and will conclude by I I 00 a.m.
   v>EPA
   United States
   Environmental Protection Agency
   Air and Radiation (6202J)
   Washington,  DC 20460

   Official Business
   Penalty for Private Use
   $300
                                                              BULK RATE
                                                              Postage and Fees Paid
                                                              EPA
                                                              G-35

-------