United States
                       Environmental Protection
                       Agency
                  Air and Radiation
                  6202J
EPA 430-N-95-003 t
April/May 1995
SEPA
Green  Lights
Update
                                                                reen
                                                               Lights
                                                  EPA Helps

                                                   Participants

                                                     Plant the

                                                     Seeds for

                                                     Earth Day '95


                                                     Look inside to learn


                                                     how participants


                                                   celebrated the twenty-fifth


                                                  anniversary of Earth Day by


                                              spreading the word about energy-


                                          efficiency and pollution prevention.
                    401 M STREET, SW (6202J), WASHINGTON, DC 20460
                      ENERGY STAR FAX LINE SYSTEM • 202 233-9659
               GREEN LIGHTS/ENERGY STAR HOTLINE 202 775-6650 • FAX 202 775-6680

-------
                                                            EARTH   DAY   '95
                                                             Northeast Participants
                                                                   Pilot  10% Plan
  Conten ts
   2.  The 10% Implementation Plan
   3  Earth Day  Events
   T1  ES Purchasing Policy
   5  Optimal ES Buildings Benefits
   6  Tech Talk
   O  Spotlight on Clean Air Cab
   7  Environmental Results from AEP
 I U  Army National Guard  Signs On
 I I  Software Corner
 I L  Implementation Form
 I 4  Tips of the Month
 14  GL is Sound Investment
 I i>  Monthly Upgrades
           The Green Lights Update is a
           free monthly publication with a
           circulation of over 35,000.
  Recipients of the Update include, Green
  Lights participants, program prospects,
  members of Congress, and interested
  members of the general public. Receipt of
  this publication is not an indication that
  your organization is a participant To add
  your name to the subscription list or, to
  find out how to pin Green Lights, call
  the Green Lights/Energy Star Hotline at
  202 775-6650.
  Although publication of all submissions is
  not guaranteed, the Update encourages
  Partners, Allies, and Endorsers to submit
  articles of interest and/or to provide input
  for future issues, Please keep in mind that
  EPA seeks only to promote energy effi-
  ciency and does not endorse any particu-
  lar product or service. If your organization
  would like to  submit material for publica-
  tion in the Green Lights Update, please fax
  material to Moira DeRosa at 202 233-9569
  or send materials to:  Update Editor, EPA
  Green Lights  (6202j),40l M Street, SW,
  Washington, DC 20460,
   o recognize the efforts of Green Lights
   participants  in  New England,  New
York, and New Jersey, Green Lights creat-
ed  the 10% plan.  The  plan, which was
based around the twenty-fifth anniversary
of Earth Day, rewards  participants with
public recognition  for  lighting projects
reported  to EPA  during  the  first few
months of 1995.
   Participants in these regions were asked
to submit Green Lights implementation
reports representing new upgrades in 10%
of their square footage between February
15 and April 3,1995. To help participants
achieve this goal, Green Lights  personnel
worked closely  with participants to help
them resolve any  technical or  reporting
questions that were preventing  successful
completion  of an  upgrade or an imple-
mentation report. This assistance included
provided telephone and intensive on-site
assistance to help  participants  overcome
barriers  and  questions.  In  addition,
Partner networks were organized and held
in Boston (March  3) and New York City
(March  20)  to  provide a forum  where
Partners  could  meet to discuss common
barriers and solutions and to share ideas
on how to meet the 10% goal.
   The  qualifying participants received
information and  materials  from  EPA
designed to highlight  their achievement
and assist them in communicating their
success during  the twenty-fifth anniver-
sary of Earth Day. Participants received:
 • A certificate of accomplishment from
    the EPA;
 • An Earth  Day press kit complete
    with customized press  lists to help
    participants  place  an article  about
    their environmental accomplishment
    in a local and/or regional paper;
 • A top ten list of actions  to do  for
    Earth Day (i.e.: plant a tree to absorb
    the  carbon  dioxide generated  by
    power plants; encourage your office to
    hold a conference or show films about
    renewable resources and energy effi-
    ciency); and
 • A sample Earth Day editorial which
    could be placed in  a regional paper or
    magazine  explaining the  organiza-
    tion's environmental achievement.

   Look for a list of successful 10% Plan
participants and their Earth Day activities
in future issues of the Update.
   In an ongoing effort to recognize and
publicize the continued growth and suc-
cess of its participants,  EPA looks forward
to developing and implementing similar
initiatives nationwide.  F8
                "The 10% Plan is a pilot project in the Northeast intended to
                  accelerate Green Lights upgrades and reward participants
                      with public recognition for their achievements."

                   - Jackie Krieger, Green Lights Implementation Team Leader
2  ' April/May 1995

-------
                   EARTH   DAY   '95
              Participants Spread the Word
                     About  Green Lights
 Vince its inception in 1970, Earth Day
 kJhas grown from a simple environmental
 wake-up call to a week-long celebration
 reaching over 200 million people in 140
 countries. Earth  Day now symbolizes
 ongoing  environmental education, action
 and change. This year on April 22, the
 nation celebrated the 25th Anniversary of
 Earth Day. The focus  of the Anniversary
 was energy efficiency, both the successes of
 sustainable energy practices  and the con-
 tinuing challenge to reduce pollution.
   To facilitate participation in Earth Day,
 EPA sent all Green  Lights participants
 suggestions for ways to demonstrate their
 organizations commitment  to environ-
 mental awareness and energy efficiency.
 Ideas included:
    Participating in local Earth Day cele-
    brations;
    Setting  up demonstrations  of new
    lighting technologies at  a company
    open house;
    Writing an article about involvement
    in Green Lights  for publication in a
    local  press  outlet  or  an  internal
    newsletter; and
    Participating in a school Earth Day
    program to educate children about air
    pollution and energy conservation.
   EPA prepared  the following products
to  help  participants  publicize  their
involvement  in Green Lights during
Earth Day activities:
Learn About Lighting With Flossie - color-
ing/activity book  about lighting geared
towards K-3 grade students.
Earth Day 25th Anniversary, Green Lights
Poster — an attractive display poster.
Green Lights Brochure - a brochure that
explains the impact lighting has on  the
Earth and how organizations that belong
to Green Lights are helping to reduce air
pollution.

   Look in future  issues of the Update to
learn how Green Lights Partners partici-
pated in Earth Day 1995.  Fl
                    Earth Day Challenge:
               Racing  to Prevent  Pollution
   By joining Green Lights, participants
   have already demonstrated their com-
mitment to a healthier planet. To recog-
nize the hard work and dedication  of
participants,  and  to  inspire them  to
increase implementation of energy effi-
cient lighting, EPA created the Earth Day
Energy Challenge.
   Open to all Green Lights participants
in the cities of (and surrounding regions)
Boston,  New York, Denver,  Atlanta,
Washington, D.C., Chicago, Dallas, and
Los  Angeles,  the Earth  Day  Energy
Challenge  encourages  participants  to
increase  pollution  prevention  efforts
between Earth Day 1995 and Earth Day
1996  (April 22, 1995-April 22,  1996).
Interested participants agreed to put forth
their best efforts in preventing pollution
through  energy-efficient lighting  up-
grades by signing up by April 20th.
  And,  the winner is... the region  that
prevents  the  most  pollution through
implementing  and  reporting efficient
lighting upgrades. Participating organiza-
tions in the winning region will be eligible
to receive:
 • The  Earth Day  Energy  Challenge
    Recognition of Achievement;
 • The  opportunity  to be  the focus a
    nationally recognized public  service
    advertising campaign;
 II Recognition in a feature story in the
    Green Lights Update; and
 • Much, much more!

   Watch future issues of the Update to
learn which Green Lights participants are
working to become part of the most ener-
gy efficient region in the United States.
For more information, call the          t
Green  Lights/Energy  Star
hotline at 202 775 6680.
                                                                                               April/May 1995  • 3

-------
                                              The Energy Star Purchasing Policy
                                                    Going to "sleep" saves big bucks for buyers
 How Much
 Can You Save?
 Energy Star equipment should cost
 no more than a comparably config-
                  ured system
                  without power
                   management A
                      single
                        Energy
              ,   ,,    Star com-
$30/year
 itor can save approximately $30 per
 year in
 elec-
 tricity
 bills, and
 Energy
 Star print-
 ers save about    $35/yGaP
 $35 per year Even a stand-alone fax
 machine saves $15 per year
 Whether you are a home user or a
 business with hundreds of comput-
                    ers, the sav-
                         ings  can
                         add  up
                        quickly.
 $ IS/year
I                                         he  Energy Star Computers Program
                                         has grown to include over 450 manu-
                                      facturers who currently produce more than
                                      2000  compliant models. Energy Star
                                      equipment includes energy-efficient com-
                                      puters,  monitors,  printers   and  fax
                                      machines that come  equipped with  an
                                      energy saving feature which allows them
                                      to power down and go to "sleep" when not
                                      in use. The Energy StarSM logo identifies
                                      these products which can be readily found
                                      anywhere you buy computer equipment.
                                      So who is buying Energy Star?
                                         The entire U.S. federal government —
                                      the largest computer buyer in the world —
                                      has committed to purchasing only Energy
                                      Star  computer  equipment.  And many
                                      other organizations, from large private cor-
                                      porations to state and local governments,
                                      have also made that same choice by signing
                                      the Energy Star Purchasing Policy. These
                                      organizations include: the  State of Ohio,
                                      the State  of  California, Carrier,  and
                                      Warner-Lambert.  Throughout the year,
                                      EPA will continue to encourage organiza-
                                      tions to join the list of Energy Star buyers.
                                         The Energy Star Purchasing Policy is a
                                      one-page document that outlines an orga-
                                      nization's   commitment  to  purchase
                                      Energy Star equipment. By signing the
                                      Purchasing Policy, organizations  make a
                                           top-down  commitment  to  revise their
                                           purchasing or procurement specifications
                                           to specify that all new purchases of com-
                                           puter  equipment meet the Energy Star
                                           guidelines, as long as performance needs
                                           are met and no significant cost differences
                                           exist. The Purchasing Policy requests that
                                           organizations encourage  their employees
                                           to turn off their machines at the end of
                                           each day and educate them on the eco-
                                           nomic and  environmental benefits of
                                           using  Energy Star equipment. Organi-
                                           zations may  sign EPA's suggested policy
                                           statement or create a customized version
                                           (just send EPA a copy upon completion).
                                              If you would like to obtain a copy of
                                           the Purchasing Policy,  please call the
                                           Energy Star hotline at 202 775-6650 and
                                           we will send  one  (or  more) to you.
                                           Alternatively, you can request the  packet
                                           called   "Purchasing    Energy    Star
                                           Computers" from  the  Fax-back Line
                                           (202  233-9659)  which contains the
                                           Buyer's Guide and the  Purchasing Policy
                                           Statement. (You  can  request multiple
                                           copies of the four-page Buyer's Guide by
                                           calling the hotline.) Signed copies of the
                                           Purchasing Policy should be sent to EPA
                                           who will then keep track of these commit-
                                           ments and highlight them in occasional
                                           press announcements. Pi
          Articles of
          Interest
     "Chico  Schools' Energy  Management
     Automation  Eliminates 1.04 MmkWh
 r>
If    Annually", Energy  User News,  January
     1995, page 4.
                                                                            "Director of  Engineering for Three
                                                                            Hospitals Uses Team Approach to Sell
                                                                            Energy Projects", Energy  User News,
                                                                            January 1995, page 36.
4  • April/May 1995

-------
                                                                                                                I   Mr
                                               BUILDINGS
  GL:  First  Step to Total Building Efficiency
                          Stage 1:  Green Lights
   To help Green Lights participants follow
EPA's Energy Star Showcase Buildings ini-
tiative (launchedJune 16,1994), the Update
is documenting the  results  of  Showcase
Buildings participants as they implement
each stage of the program. This article, the
third in a series, describes Stage 1: How Green
Lights optimizes benefits from the Energy
Star Buildings program.
Participant '*'*„
                                         n commercial buildings, lighting typical-
                                         ly consumes up to 40 percent of the total
                                        energy used, and Green Lights  upgrades
                                        can produce lighting loads by as much as
                                        75 percent. However, lighting systems do
                                        more than just convert electricity to light.
                                        Lights generate heat, and inefficient sys-
                                        tems generate more heat than energy-effi-
                                        cient ones.
                                           Lighting systems therefore affect heat-
                                        ing,  ventilating,  and air-conditioning
                                        (HVAC) systems, increasing the cooling
                                        necessary to keep a building comfortable.
                                        One kilowatt of lighting  load  produces
                                        almost one kilowatt of heat (3,413 BTUs)
                                        —  so  using fewer  watts for  lighting
                                        reduces electricity used and heat created.
                                        As shown below, Green Lights  upgrades
                                        installed by Energy Star Showcase partic-
                                        ipant Mobil R&D are producing annual
                                        energy cost savings of $42,000 and reduc-
                                        ing the cooling load  by 45 tons. This
                                        reduction  in  cooling  load  saved Mobil
                                        R&D  $18,000  when  they bought new
                                        chillers. In addition, Mobil R&D is saving
                                        $8,700  a year  in cooling costs due to

                                                        FANNIE MAE
Square Feet*,;, *,      '""'.,»"•               -  250,000
                                                                                Green Lights upgrades.
                                                                                   Green Lights upgrades allow Energy
                                                                                Star Buildings to take fuller advantage of
                                                                                HVAC upgrades, including:
                                                                                 Hi Installing  variable   speed  drives
                                                                                    (VSDs);
                                                                                 I Reducing fan motor sizes; and
                                                                                 • Downsizing chillers, while maintain-
                                                                                    ing cooling comfort for peak loads.
                                                                                   Without the cooling load reductions
                                                                                from  Green  Lights  upgrades,  many
                                                                                HVAC upgrades are far less profitable or
                                                                                are ineffective. Even though installing the
                                                                                most   energy-efficient  lighting   will
                                                                                increase initial lighting upgrade costs, the
                                                                                extra HVAC savings will often offset this
                                                                                increase. The annual  energy  cost savings
                                                                                shown  below indicate the  role Green
                                                                                Lights upgrades can play in Energy  Star
                                                                                Buildings.
                                                                                   The June Update will take a closer look
                                                                                at  Stage 2: Building Tune-Ups.  To learn
                                                                                more about the Energy Star Buildings and
                                                                                showcase programs, call the Green Lights/
                                                                                Energy Star Hotline at 202 775-6650.   M
                                                                               Mobil R&D        Connecticut Mutual
                                                                                 340,000           '    4S4000   ~~™
Annual Li;
Electricity
	 --
Cooling
Potential
Annual
                                                                                                  April/May 1995 • 5

-------
                                                                            TA L K
                                          Quality & Efficient Fluorescent Lamps
                                                       Delivering the best of both worlds
      When It comes to fluorescent
    lighting, becoming more energy-
    efficient does not mean sacrificing
  quality. Use "T8" or "T10" lampsfor
    maximum energy-efficiency and
    improved lighting quality — the
         best of both worlds.
J-luorescent lamps are available in a vari-
I ety of shapes and sizes. T8 and TlO
lamps — so-named because of the diam-
eter of the bulb — produce more light
output  per watt than conventional T12
lamps.  And with the use of rare-earth
triphosphor coatings, these lamps pro-
duce light that brings out the true color
of your surroundings. T8 and TlO lamps
can be  used in a variety of settings to
reduce energy use and prevent pollution.

            T8 Lamps

  Many Green Lights participants have
chosen  to convert their T12 lighting sys-
tems to T8  systems. As of February
1995, participants have installed over 6
million T8 lamps. When  making the
REPRESENTATIVE PERFORMANCE VALUES
Assuming 3-tamp, rapid-start e/ectmnfc Waste (ballast factor = 0.88)
Initial Lamp Maintained
Lamp CRI Lamp Lumen System
Lumens Depreciation Lumens'
32W-T8 75
85
40W-TIO 80
40W-TI2 622
73
85
34W-TI2 62
73
85
1 Maintained System Lumens =
2850 0.91
3050 0.93
3700 0.89
3050 0.87
3200 0.90
3300 0.90
2650 0.87
2800 0.90
2900 0.90
6862
7521
8713
6997
7603
7841
6073
6653
6867
System
Wattage
90
90
110
107
107
107
92
92
92
Maintained
Lumens
per Watt
76
84
79
65
71
73
66
72
75
3 lamps/ballast x initial lumens x lamp lumen depredation x ballast latter (0.88).
2 40-wattTI2 lamps with a CRI tess than 69 will no longer be manufactured or imported after
white lamps have a CRI of 62.
/ 013 1195. Cool-
transition to the T8 system, keep the fol-
lowing factors in mind:
   • T8 lamps with electronic ballasts
are designed to produce light levels that
are comparable  to conventional  T12
lamps and magnetic ballasts, while  con-
suming 30-40% less energy.
   • T8 lamps require compatible  elec-
tronic ballasts to operate.
   • T8 lamps are generally available in
two versions of color rendering: A thin
triphosphor coat produces a color  ren-
dering index  (CRI) in  the  70s, and a
thick triphosphor coat produces a CRI in
the 80s  (see definition  of CRI on the
next page). Standard "cool-white" lamps
have a CRI of 62.
   • T8 lamps  and electronic ballasts
are available to serve nearly  all full-size
fluorescent  applications with   lamp
lengths of 2', 3', 4', 5', and 8'. In addition,
several U-shaped versions are available.
   • T8 lamps  usually cost less  than
T12 lamps with the same color rendering
index.

           TlO Lamps
                                                                              TlO lamps  offer improvements in
                                                                            efficacy  and color rendering  that  are
                                                                            comparable to T8  lamps. However, sig-
                                                                            nificant operating differences exist:
                                                                              • TlO lamps produce over 20% more
                                                                            light than  standard T12  lamps, while
                                                                            consuming  approximately  the  same
                                                                            amount of energy.
                                                                              • TlO lamps may be used with T12
                                                                            ballasts.
6 ' April/May 1995

-------
                                                                                                       »JG rleen! Lig'Hf
                                                                                                        UPDATi
   • TlO lamps have a color rendering
index of 80, compared with a CRI of 62
for "cool-white" lamps.
   # TlO lamps have  a longer life  —
24,000 hours.
   (8 TlO lamps are only available as 4-
foot straight lamps.
   • Although  these   higher-output
lamps  cost  more  than  conventional
lamps, they are cost-effective for improv-
ing light levels  or  offsetting light-level
reductions resulting from delamping.


            Conclusions
   • Use T8  or TlO lamps with elec-
tronic ballasts to improve the efficacy and
color rendering performance of your  flu-
orescent lighting systems.
   • When  using  T8 lamps,  specify
lamps with a CRI of 82-85 to yield max-
imum efficacy and improved color ren-
dering. (Note, however, that special T8
lamps with a CRI over 90  will sacrifice
efficiency to achieve such unusually high
color rendering.)
                        • The  use of triphosphor coatings
                     improves color rendering, boosts efficacy,
                     and reduces lumen depreciation over the
                     lamp's life, resulting in further increases
                     in overall system performance.
                        • As the table  below shows, 40W-
                     TlO lamps provide  over 24% more light
                     than standard 40W-T12  lamps  while
                     consuming only about 3% more energy;
                     32W-T8 lamps with a CRI of 85 produce
                     over 7% more light than standard 40W-
                     T12 lamps while consuming about 16%
                     less energy.
                        • When  converting a 3-lamp  fluo-
                     rescent  system  consisting of standard
                     40W-T12 lamps and magnetic ballasts to
                     a  T8/electronic ballast system,  expect
                     energy savings of 30-40%.
                        More detailed information is provided
                     in the Lighting  Upgrade Manual and at
                     the  Lighting  Upgrade Workshops (see
                     the back page for a schedule of upcoming
                     workshops). In addition, the ProjectKalc
                     analytical software tool can now be used
                     to evaluate the performance of any light-
                     ing system,  r'w
     T-8 (8/8")
T-10(10/8")
T-12 (12/8")
    BBgV^
    if?Ai§i¥ft!&^iHtefef
The names of these
lamps are based on
the diameter of
their bulbs.
                     T-8: Maintains light output, reduces energy
                 T-10: Increases light output, minimal energy increase
                           T-12: Conventional technology
                                               Glossary
  fluorescent Bo//ast A device used to provide
  the necessary starting voltage, while limiting
  and regulating fluorescent lamp current.
  Available as magnetic, electronic or hybrid;
  choose electronic or hybrid ballasts for high
  efficiency.
  Color Rendering Index (CRI): A scaie of a light
  source's effect on the color appearance of an
  object, compared to its color appearance
  under a reference light source. CRI is
  expressed on a scale of I  to 100, where 100
  indicates no color shift. Colors appearing under
  low-CRI light sources appear dull or unnatural.
  A CRI in the range of 75-100 is considered
  excellent
  Co/or Temperature: A measure of the "warmth"
  or "coolness" of a light source. Measured in
  Kelvins, a lamp is considered "warm" when it
  has a color temperature less than 3200K
  (emphasizing the red side of the spectrum); a
  lamp is considered cool when it has a  color
  temperature greater than 4000K (emphasizing
  the blue side of the spectrum). Color tempera-
  ture is an architectural choice that has  little
  impact on color rendering or efficacy
  Efficacy: A measurement of the "efficiency" of a
  light source.This metric  used to compare light
  output to energy consumption. Unlike "efficien-
  cy" light source efficacy is measured in dissimilar
  units — lumens per watt (For example, anoth-
  er efficacy metric is "miles per gallon.")
  Initial Lamp Lumens: The light output of a
  lamp after the first 100  hours of operation.
  During the first 100 hours, the light output of a
  lamp may drop by as much as 9%. Before mea-
  suring the initial light levels produced by your
  upgrade, let the lamps "burn-in" for  100 hours.
  Lamp Lumen Depredation (LLDj: All lamps
  have the tendency to produce less light as they
1  age. Lamp lumen depreciation curves for spe-
  cific lamps are available from manufacturers.
  The lumen output at 40% of the lamp's rated
  life is indicative of the average light output to
  be expected over the lamps operating life.
  Maintained Lumens: The output of a light
  source after accounting for lamp lumen depre-
  ciation. The light output of a lamp at 40% rated
  life represents its lifetime average. Initial lamp
  lumens multiplied by lamp lumen depreciation  j
  yields the maintained lumens. Also known as
  "design lumens."
  THphosphor Coatings:  A blend of three kinds of
  rare-earth phosphors that provide outputs
  that highlight red, green, and blue — colors
|  that blend together to produce wh'rte light.
  Also referred to as trichromatic, rare-earth, tri-
  stimulus, and prime-color: Older technology
  coatings — such as cool-white or warm-white
  standard-grade halophosphors — are less effi-
  cacious and generally yield lower CRI values
  than triphosphor coatings.
                                                                                                          April/May 1995  •  7

-------
 Green  Lights
 UPDATE
                                                   I IM  T H E
                                                   G H T
                                               Clean Air  Cab Riders Enlightened
                                                      Big opportunities for a small business
David Moederndorfer, Vice President of Sales
and Marketing for Clean Air Cab poses in
front of a newly decorated cab.
       January 1995, Washingtonians
%/have been learning about Green Lights
just by hailing a cab. Green Lights Partner
Clean Air Cab Company, Inc. is spread-
ing the word on the sides of its cabs and
with  a PSA inside that explains  what
Green Lights is all about.
   According to  David Moederndorfer,
Vice President of Sales and Marketing, the
company was delighted when EPA offered
the small  business  a big opportunity to
promote Green Lights. With its fleet of 15
natural gas-powered cabs, Clean  Air Cab
supports using environmentally  friendly
technology. Moederndorfer worked with
EPA to develop a Green Lights logo decal
that could  be applied to the sides of their
cabs. A PSA was developed that  is placed
in the back of the cabs where passengers
can read about Clean Air Cab's participa-
tion in Green Lights  and the benefits it
gains from the program.  A cab ride can
now help you learn how to prevent pollu-
tion and save money.
   Drivers have indicated that  their pas-
sengers' responses to the decals  and PSAs
have been very positive. "The ridership is
very supportive of what we're trying to do
here," says Moederndorfer. "Other small
businesses that want to help the environ-
ment should know that people are very
positive about our environmental efforts."
   Moederndorfer sees joining Green
Lights as a natural step for any small busi-
ness interested in saving money, preventing
pollution and promoting a better environ-
ment. Clean Air  Cab plans to complete
lighting  upgrades in  its  downtown
Washington office. At Clean Air Cab, nat-
ural  gas-fueled  vehicles and energy-
                     efficient lighting
                     are both ways a
                     small  firm  can
                     prevent pollu-
                     tion while sav-
                     ing on operating
                     cost. If you want
                     to  learn more
                     about  how small
                     businesses  can
                     benefit from the
                      Green  Lights
                      program,   call
                      the  Hotline at
                     202  775-6650.
8  • April/May 1995

-------
                    A L I_Y   CORNER
                                                                                             Green  Lig'&'fea
                                                                                             UPDAf
      AEP Generates  Environmental Results
          Creating improved utility-customer relationships
 /Jccording to Hal Powers, Lighting
/ iPrograms Coordinator for American
Electric Power (AEP), employees have
been swearing they look years younger
ever since  this  Green Lights Utility Ally
replaced the harsh, cool-white lamps in
the rest rooms and common areas of its
Columbus, OH, headquarters with softer,
more flattering T-8 lamps. While workers
enjoy more youthful appearances, AEP is
making substantial strides in energy con-
servation and pollution prevention.
   AEP joined EPA's Green Lights pro-
gram in December 1992, becoming the
largest  coal-fired Utility Ally at the time.
With seven operating companies supply-
ing electricity to 7 million customers in
seven states, AEP agreed to survey
and upgrade 10.4 million square feet
of facilities.                        -v,
                                  ijr
        Implementing
          Upgrades
   To  oversee lighting projects in
2,700 of its buildings, power plants,
and  substations, AEP  convened an
11-member Green Lights Task Force
headed  by Dale Heydlauff, AEPs
Vice President-Environmental Affairs
and  Green Lights Implementation
Director. The task force has orches-
trated 2,348 lighting surveys  in 84
percent of AEP's facilities.
   The  utility's 31-story, 627,000
square foot headquarters building has
been surveyed, and  18 floors  have
been upgraded. AEP is  replacing 40-
watt T-8 lamps with energy-efficient
                                       32-watt T-8s and  electronic ballasts. By
                                       installing  occupancy sensors, LED exit
                                       signs, and compact fluorescents with elec-
                                       tronic ballasts AEP was able to save even
                                       more.  When   AEP  has  completed
                                       upgrades to all its buildings by 1997, EPA
                                       estimates  the  utility will  prevent more
                                       than 10 million pounds of CO2, SO2, and
                                       NOX emissions and save approximately 32
                                       million  kilowatt-hours annually.
                                         AEP's Task Force is relying on internal
                                       funds and energy cost savings projections
                                       to finance its lighting upgrades. According
                                       to Powers, as a government-regulated util-
                                       ity, this is  the only funding option that
                                       does affect the  company's bottom line.
                                       Streamlining  the  review  process and
obtaining cost savings through large-vol-
ume purchases helps  reduce  upgrade
expenses. The  project is  figured into
AEP's annual operating expenses.

        Recruiting Green
       Lights Participants

   AEP is hoping others also  can save
money, prevent pollution,  and improve
lighting quality. The utility has established
a recruiting  program,  with each of its
operating companies using  its marketing
representatives  and  customer  service
power engineers to contact 25 to 30 indus-
trial and commercial customers each year
to discuss Green Lights.
   For  example, AEP's West Virginia-
based Wheeling  Power Company  co-
sponsored  a  seminar with   Sylvania
Lighting to educate Wheeling Power cus-
tomers about Green Lights. Additionally,
   AEP's Virginia-based  Appalachian
   Power occupied a booth  at  the
   Connection '94  Electro Expo and gen-
   erated strong interest in Green Lights
   among the more than 5,000 conven-
   tioneers.
     To help others in their  lighting
  upgrade endeavors and reward energy
  efficiency initiatives, AEP will launch
  an audit  and financing program later
  this year. The program, for commercial
  and  industrial  customers, will offer
  low-interest loans for upgrade projects.
  According to Powers, the audits and
  financial   assistance   will   create
  improved  utility-customer  relation-
  ships, which are  the key to future ener-
  gy-saving programs.
    To learn how your organization can
  do  more, call  the  Green  Lights/
  Energy Star Hotline at 202 775-6650.
                                                                                              April/May 1995 • 9

-------
Sp r e e n Lights
ilPDATE
                                                TIPS  OF   THE   MONTH
                                                                 Simplifying
                                                                  Reporting
   Lighting-Related
   Events
      Green Lights Workshops
   are listed on the back page of
   this Update.
   I995LIGHTFAIR,
   Location:  Chicago, IL
   Contact AMCTradeshows,
     404220-2215
   Dote: June 7-9, 1995
   NeoCon'95/The Buildings Show
   Location:  Chicago, IL
   Contact: NeoCon,
    800 667-6278
    The Buildings Show,
    312 527-7598
   Dote; June  12-14, 1995

   1995 Illuminating Engineering
    Society of North America
    IESNA) Annual Conference
   Location;  New York, NY
   Contact Valerie Landers,
    212248-5000,ext. 117
   Dote: July 29-August 3, 1995
 /111 Green Lights program participants
/ tare asked to report at least once per
year on any progress they have  made with
lighting surveys and upgrades. Reporting
has several benefits for both program par-
ticipants and EPA, including:  summariz-
ing  progress;  verifying savings;  and
calculating pollution  prevented.  But,
reporting does not need to be complicated
or time-consuming. To simplify reporting,
EPA recommends the following:

              Tipl:
           Plan Ahead
   Talk to your Account Manager  (for-
merly known  as  your  Implementation
Support Specialist) before you begin light-
ing surveys and upgrades. Your Account
Manager can help you keep reporting sim-
ple.  If you are  computer  compatible,
ReportKalc is simple and well-organized,
In  addition, the  upcoming version  of
ProjectKalc  (version 2.0) software, EPA's
project analysis tool, will allow users to
export project data directly to ReportKalc
and thus, EPA's report form.

              Tip 2:
 Consolidate Your Information
   Consider ways  to  consolidate your
information; your Account Manager can
help. For example, condense  all informa-
tion about a building (or many buildings)
in one report. JC Penney reported on 22
million square feet with only two lines on
one report form! Lowes, Inc. reported all
upgrades at their stores on one form, and
Wachovia is consolidating over  100 of
their  Georgia  offices onto  one  form.
Likewise,  Kindercare summarized pro-
jects at  over 1100 facilities on just one
form.

              Tip 3:
      Use Your Contractor
   If you use one, ask your lighting con-
tractor for help. This is a great opportuni-
ty to work with Green Lights Allies and
Surveyor Allies, who can easily help with,
or complete reports themselves. Hofstra
University is requiring their contractor to
complete   all  report  forms.  Service
Merchandise asked Sylvania Lighting
Services to complete  report forms for
more  than  80 upgraded buildings.  Ask
your contractor to contact your Account
Manager for advice on reporting.
   Telling us what you are doing is impor-
tant to  the success of Green Lights, so
make it easy. Plan in advance, consolidate
information, use your contractor, and work
with your Account Manager. EPA  uses
the information  from these forms to
inform  Congress  about your work  pre-
venting pollution.  This data  also helps
EPA determine other profitable opportu-
nities for improving your lighting efficien-
cy and quality. ™
10  - April/May 1995

-------
 GREEN  LIGHTS  IMPLEMENTATION  REPORT
                                                                                              OMB # 2060-0255 Exp. 3/31/96


SURVEY REPORT
(fill in sections 1,2,4,6, and 12 below)

COMPLETED PROJECT REPORT
(fill in sections 1-12 below)
Date:
Page of
                                                                                                     (attach additional pages as needed)
1. FACILITY INFORMATION
Company Name:
Facility Name:
Facility address:
City/St./ZipCode
Facility type*
                       New Construction?
                               Yes  No
2. LIGHTING FIXTURES BEFORE UPGRADE   (*use codes on back)
Fixture
Type"
Fixture
Quantity
       Lamp
Lamp
Wattage
Lamps/
Fixture
Ballast
Type"
Lamps/
Ballast
Wattage
per  Fixture
Lighting
hours/year
4. LIGHTING CONTROLS BEFORE UPGRADE
   Typel*
            Quantity
                  Type 2*
            Quantity
                Type 3*
                                                     Quantity
6. MAINTENANCE METHODS BEFORE UPGRADE
   Group relamping?
                Yes   No   Fixture cleaning?
                              Yes  No
                                   Facility Manager:
                                   Telephone No./FAX No.
                                   Total Floorspace for this Facility:
                                   Floorspace included in this report:
                                   Is this the FIRST report sent to EPA for this floorspace?
                                                                                                                    sq.ft.
                                                                                                                    sq.ft.
                                                                                     Yes   No
                                                        3. LIGHTING FIXTURES AFTER UPGRADE
Upgrade
Type*
Fixture
Type*
Fixture
Quantity
Lamp
Type*
Lamp
Wattage
Lamps/
Fixture
Ballast
Type*
                                                                                         (*use codes on back)
Lamps/
Ballast
Wattage
per Fixture
Lighting
hours/yea
                                                        5. LIGHTING CONTROLS AFTER UPGRADE
                                            Typel*
                                                                        Quantity
                                                     Type 2*
                                                                                              Quantity
                                                                                                           Type 3*
                                                                                                                  Quantity
                                                        7. MAINTENANCE METHODS AFTER UPGRADE
                                     Group relamping?
                                                      Yes   No   Fixture cleaning?
                                                                           Yes
                                                                            No
8. COMMENTS
9. PROJECT COSTS
Survey
Administrative
Materials
Installation Labor
Disposal/Recycling Costs:
Other Costs
Total Project Cost
Rebates/Grants
                                     10. LIGHTING SAVINGS
                                     Lighting Load Reduced
                                     Electricity Reduction
                                     % Lighting Savings
                                     Energy Cost Savings
                                     Internal Rate of Return
                                                               kW
                                                             kWh/yr
                                                               $/yr
                                                                       11. IMPLEMENTATION METHODS:
                                                              Survey/Analysis*
                                                              Equipment Provider*
                                                              Installation Method*
                                                              Financing Method*
                                                                      use codes on the back for these entries
                                     12. SIGNATURE
                                                          Are you?    GL Implementation Director
                                                                                 Facility Manager    Other
                                     Send to: Jackie Krieger, Green Lights, US-EPA 6202J, 401 M St. SW, Washington DC 20460 , or
                                     w A Y fr, nm\ ?n-QSfiQ  Fnr nuestions call the Green Lights technical hotline: 202-775-6650

-------
 GREEN LIGHTS  IMPLEMENTATION REPORT  CODES
       Facility Type
  1000 Office"
  1001 Warehouse
  1002 Industrial Manufacturing
  1003 Retail sales
  1004 HealthCare
  1005 Lodging (hotels, dormitories etc.)
  1006 Assembly (churches, auditoriums, etc.)
  1007 Education (classrooms)
  1008 Food sales and service
  1009 Parking Garage
  1010 Laboratory
  1011 Outdoor

       Fixture Type
    13 Fluorescent- commercial- no lens
    14 Fluorescent- commercial-clear lens
    15 Fluorescent- commercial-translucent lens
    16 Fluorescent - deep cell louver
    17 Fluorescent - small cell louver
    18 Fluorescent- industrial-open fixture
    19 Fluorescent- industrial-enclosed fixture
    20 Incandescent- downlight ("can")
    21 Incandescent-spotlight/floodlight
    22 Incandescent-decorati ve/sconce
    23 Incandescent-pendant fixture
    24 Incandescent-general illumination
    25 Incandescent-exterior/landscape
    26 Incandescent - track  lighting
    27 HID-outdoor-cobra head
    28 HID-outdoor-shoe box
    29 HID-outdoor-wallpak/flood
    30 HID-outdoor-landscape
    31 HID-outdoor-sports  lighting
    32 HID-indoor-high bay
    33 HID-indoor-low bay
    34 HID-indoor-recessed commercial
    35 HID-indoor-sports lighting
    36 Exit sign-incandescent
    37 Exit sign-fluorescent
    38 Exitsign-LED
    39 Exit sign-electroluminescent
    40 Exit sign- tritium
    41  Exit sign- luminescent
    42 Indirect

       Installation by
  2030 in-house staff
  2031  contractor
  2032 utility
    Lamp Type
54  T-8
55  T-10
56  T-12 Energy Saving
57  T-12 Cathode cut-out
58  T-12 High Lumen
59  T-12 Standard
60  T-12 High Output (SOOma)
61  T-12 VHO(1 SOOma)
62  T-17VHO(1500ma)
63  T-5 single ended
64  Compact twin-tube
65  Compact quad-tube
66  Compact-integrated ballast
67  Compact-circular
68  Incandescent-general service (A, PS,T)
69  Incandescent-Reflector (R, PAR, ER)
70  Incandescent-decorative
71  Halogen-general service
72  Halogen-reflector (R,PAR, MR)
73  Halogen-tubular
74  HID-mercury vapor
75  HID-metal halide
76  HID-high pressure sodium
77  HID-white-HPS
78  Low pressure sodium
79  T-12 Slimline

    Ballast Type
80  Fluorescent-old standard magnetic
81  Fluorescent-efficient magnetic
82  Fluorescent-hybrid/cathode cutout
83  Fluorescent-standard electronic
84  Fluorescent-integrated electronic
85  Fluorescent-extended output electronic
86  Fluorescent-partial output electronic
87  Fluorescent-dimming electronic
88  Fluorescent-step dimming electronic
89  Fluorescent-HO standard magnetic
90  Fluorescent-HO (SOOma) electronic
91  Fluorescent-VHO standard magnetic
92  Fluorescent-compact magnetic
93  Fluorescent-compact electronic
94  HID-magnetic
95  HID-electronic
96  Fluorescent-HO efficient magnetic
97  Fluorescent-VHO efficient magnetic
      Upgrade Type
  110  Relamp only
  111  Delamp only
  112  Relamp and reballast
  113  Specular reflector delamp
  114  Reflector Reballast
  115  New Lens/Reflector Reballast
  116  Ne\\ lens/louver
  117  New fixture
  118  Convert Incand. to Fluorescent or HID
  119  Task Lighting

      Control Type
  100  Manual switching
  101  Manual dimming
  102  Occupancy sensor
  103  Timed switching
  104  Timed dimming
  105  Daylight switching
  106  Daylight dimming
  107  Panel level dimming
  108  Panel level EMS
  109  Power reducer

      Survey/Analysis by
2010  in-house personnel
2011  independent consultant
2012  electrical contractor
2013  utility representative
2014  equipment supplier
2015  lighting management company
2016  energy services company
2017  Green Lights Surveyor Ally
2018  Architect
2019  Lighting Designer
2024  Electrical Distributor

      Equipment Provided by
2020  lighting equipment supplier
2021  lighting management company
2022  utility
2023  contractor

      Financing by
2040  internal funds
2041  conventional loan
2042  utility
2043  lease'lease-purchase
2044  shared savings
2045  other
   POLLUTION PREVENTION
       You may want to estimate the
       pollution prevention of this
       project for your own use. Use the
       following formulas and factors:
CO2:  kWhyr
       saved
S02:  kWh/yr
       saved
NOx:  kWh/yr
       saved
x    emission
     factor
x    emission
     factor
x    emission
     factor
Ibs'yr

g'yr

g/yr
  EPA Regional Emission Factors (see note below)
REGION 1: CT, MA, ME, NH, RI, VT
Emission per      CO2      SO2   NOx
kWh saved:        1.1       4.0     1.4
REGION 27NJ, NY, PR, VI
Emission per       CO2      SO2   NOx
kWh saved:         1.1       3.4     1.3
REGION 3: DC, DE, MD, PA, VA, WV
Emission per      CO2     SO2   NOx
kWh saved:        1.6       8.2    2.6
REGION 4: AL, FL, GA, KY, MS, NC, SC, TN
Emission per      CO2      SO2   NOx
kWh saved:         1.5       6.9    2.5
REGION 5HL,IN, MI.MN, OH, WI
Emission per      CO2      SO2   NOx
kWh saved:         1.8      10.4    3.5
REGION 6: AR, LA, NM, OK, TX
Emission per      CO2     SO2   NOx
kWh saved:         1.7      2.2    2.5
REGION 7. LA, KS,MO, NE
Emission per      CO2     SO2   NOx
kWh saved:        2.0      8.5    3.9
REGION 8: CO, MT, ND, SD, UT, WY
Emission per      CO2     SO2   NOx
kWh saved:         2.2      3.3    3.2
REGION9: AZ, CA.HI,NV,Guam, Am Samoa
Emission per      CO2     SO2   NOx
kWh saved:         1.0       1.1    1.5
REGION 10: AIQD, OR/WAT
Emission per      CO2     SO2   NOx
kWh saved:        0.1      0.5    0.3
     Note: State pollution emission factors are
    aggregated by EPA region. Factors for U.S.
  territories are national average emission factors.
  See the Green Lights Lighting Upgrade Manual.
page: of 6200I93O94)

-------
                                                                                          Green  Lights
                     Green Lights Welcomes New Participants
   Sixty-four new participants joined
Green Lights in January and February to
take advantage of the benefits of energy-
efficient lighting upgrades. Green Lights
now has more than 1,700 participants,
with expectations of enormous energy
savings   and  pollution  prevention
through the program.
   Green Lights welcomes its new par-
ticipants and looks forward to working
with them. If you organization would
like more  informalloa aboijt the: pro-
gram, please  c^I$|i€=: Green  Lights
Hotline at 202 75S-665&;  .'•    .'
                                             PARTNERS (40)
                   Albert Einstein Medical Center  • Alexandria City Public Schools  • Anne Arurtdel
                     County Public Schools • Audubon Society of New Hampshire  • BMC West
                 Corporation • Becton Dickinson and Company • Black Dome Mountain Shop, Ittc, •
                   Boswell Engineering • Bucks County, Pennsylvania • Centinela  Hospital Medical;
                Center • The City of Chesapeake, Virginia • County of San Mateo • Dimensioiiil Cfl
                    Field Services, Inc. •  Donaldson Company, Inc.  • Dudley Street Neighborhood
                    Initiative • Eisenhower Medical Center • General Motors Hughes Electronics^ ;
                Corporate Headquarters • JPS International Company • Kenetech Windpower •  Kent
                   County Public Schools • Lodi Unified School District • The City of Loma Littiaj'  '
                  California • Magnavox Electronic Systems Company • Manko, Gold & Katchejpil. • ;
                  Morehead State University • Nuestra Comunidad Development Corporation
                  Enterprise Center • Patagonia •  Robert F. Kennedy Medical Center • The
                  San Jose, California  • The City of Santa Monica, California •  Saugus Union Sdliocji
                  District  • Seagate Technology, Inc. •  The City of St. Paul, Minnesota • Sumit%n0
                 Bank of California • TD Industries • The West Company • Toy Chest-Kid's Closet
                             • Tulane University Medical Center • WoodlakeTowers •       ;'.'• "•"••.

                                               ALLIES (14)                         J
                CIC Supply  • Digital Power Company, Inc.  • GEC Lighting Supply  • Mason Coonf^,
                     Public Utility District No. 3 • Northstar Technologies 8c Lighting •  Prolum^e
                 Corporation • Quality Lighting • Southland Electrical Supply Company • Stuart,,jC,.'-
                  Irby Co. • The Hite Company • TMP, Inc. • Tucson Electric Power Company ••>.'  ,
                             United Energy Associates • Wheatstone Energy Group, Inc.       .".  x

                                            ENDORSERS  (10)
                    American Hospital Association • Boulder County Clean Air Consortium •  TSJje,'< 'v':'
                 Electrical Association of Philadelphia • HVS Eco Services •  Massachusetts Municipal'
                   Wholesale Electric Co.  • National Association  of State Facilities Administrators;, •
                 Pacific Northwest Ski Areas Association • Pennsylvania Association  of School Business
                  Officials • The Regional Air Pollution Control Agency •  Sacramento MetropdBta||
                                             Chamber of Commerce                      ,    ;
                                                                                                           13

-------
       reen  Lights
      1PDATE
                                                                                    CORNER
                                            Updated  Directory Released in Spring '95
                                             Updated information  on  utility and
                                             third-party   rebate  and  financing
                                          options is currently being collected for the
                                          Green  Lights Financing Directory.  The
                                          updated directory should be available in the
                                          late spring and can be ordered through the
                                          Green Lights Hotline at 202 775-6650.
                                          •  An expert  advisor module is  being
                                          developed for ProjectKalc. The expert ad-
                                          visor will allow  users to request fixture
                                          upgrade recommendations for existing fix-
                                          tures,  select upgrades from  the fixtures
                                          recommended or enter their own upgrade
                                                         solutions.  The  expert advisor  will also
                                                         integrate the selected upgrades with the
                                                         lighting, energy savings, and financial cal-
                                                         culations provided in the ProjectKalc soft-
                                                         ware. The ProjectKalc expert advisor will
                                                         be beta tested during the summer and is
                                                         expected to be released in the fall.
                                                         • A  MS-Windows  version  of  the
                                                         progress reporting software, ReportKalc, is
                                                         being planned. Watch for the next issue of
                                                         Software Corner for more information on
                                                         the Windows-ReportKalc development and
                                                         release schedule. Pa
                                               Sound Investment for Uncertain Times
   Upgrades achieve returns with lower risk
            than stocks & bonds
50
40
30
10
        Typical
       CL Upgrades
         (IRR)
 Common
  Stocks
(since 1954)
                       ith another year of volatile market
                       activity  in both  stocks and bonds,
                   investors are  undoubtedly  feeling  more
                   unsure than ever  about how to  wisely
                   invest their money. Strategists continue to
                   advise investors that especially in times of
                   market uncertainty, the  key to successful
                   investing includes a diversified portfolio.
                      As the chart below  indicates,  stocks
                   have  significantly  outperformed  other
                   investments such as bonds and short-term
                   vehicles, despite historical  instability of
                   the stock market. In fact, over the past 40
                   years, the annual return of stocks has aver-
                   aged 11.8% a year — nearly double the
                   rate of bonds.
                                                                     43%
Long Term
Corporate
  Bonds
(since 1954)
   Green Lights participants, however,
discover that stocks aren't the last word in
profitable  financial  investing. Properly
designed lighting upgrades, based  on
those  reported by Green Lights  partici-
pants, leave stocks as well as bonds in  the
dust, with internal rates of return (IRR)
typically above 40% per year. The current
average IRR for all reported Green Lights
upgrades is 49%, as shown below. Keep in
mind that Green Lights upgrades achieve
these returns with much lower risk than
stocks and bonds.
   Looking for a safe, high-return invest-
ment with which to diversify your portfo-
lio? Look no further than Green Lights.
Join Green Lights, upgrade your facility
space  with  energy-efficient lighting and
congratulate yourself on your investment
acumen in outperforming  the  financial
    i     WM
markets. MB
    14 • April/May 1995

-------
                                               U P G RAD E  S
             January and February Upgrades

    The following program participants submitted implementation reports on complet-
 ed lighting upgrades during January and February.
January
Abbott Laboratories, AlMusur
Aladdin Lighting Supply, Ted Murphy
Alta Bates Medical Center, Joseph Rieger
Ashland Oil, Inc., Michael].  Vogt
Ball Corporation, Metal Container
    Operations, David Stockard
Browning-Ferris Industries, John Joyner
CF Industries, Inc., Pat Faimiu
City Lighting Products Company,
    Lester L. Hohl
Consumer Lighting Products,
    David Simon
Data General Corporation,
    Blair M. Wentworth
Embarcadero Center, Daryl Berg
Energy Specialities, Inc., Thomas Grimm
Enersave, Inc., Jeffrey si. Titus
Epson Portland, Inc., Randy McEvers
First Union National Bank,/zw Snell
Fulton County, Georgia, Jim Winslett
Graybar Electric Company, William Trussell
Halliburton Company, Gene Ballew
Harris Corporation, Ray E. Rader
Hewlett-Packard Co., Robert Lanning
Huntsville City Schools, Don Sadler
ITT Corporation, William Eisenbrey
International Technology Corporation,
    Frank C. Rice
JFMC Facilities Corporation,
    Richard Gordon Katz
Kent County, Maryland, James Wright
Lupo & Associates, Don Lupo
Lutheran Homes of Oshkosh,
   Alan R. Abraham
MTI International,  Vandana  Upadhyay
Milwaukee Insurance, Glen A. Perry
Montgomery County, Maryland,
   Homeira Razavi
New Hampshire Hospital Association,
   Debbie Augustine
New Mexico Energy Consultants,
    Wayne K. Bond
Northern Arizona University, Mark Flynn
Prince Georges  County, Maryland,
   Andrea Leahy-Fucheck
RUST Geotech, Inc., Anita Gorski
Rochester Institute of Technology, Lou Boyon
Spartan Printing Co., Jack Hutchinson
Summit Electric Supply, Becky Gary
The Washington Times, James Yokota
USX/US Steel Group, Roy].  Weiskircher
 Valley Motors, Incorporated, John Gracki
 Van Der Horst, USA, Clarence Fritz
 WW Grainger, Inc., ArshadAH
 Walt Disney Studios, Roy Huebner
 Wellington Sears Company,
    T. Halliburton Wood
 Wisconsin Public Power, Inc. System,
    Michael Dolinac
 Wolff Brothers Supply, Carl Burns
 Woman's World Shops, Inc.,
    Norman Lieberman
 YESCO,/o/&« Rouscher

 February
 Albertson's, Inc., DonaldBurk
 Alliant Techsystems, Inc., ValMunshi
 Alta Bates Medical  Center, Joseph Rieger
 American Standard, Daniel Elliott
 BP Exploration - Alaska, James Fairbanks
 Bank of Hawaii, John Hashizume
 BellSouth Telecommunications, Harold Drain
 Border States Electric Supply, Barry Nelson
 Burrito Brothers, Peter Fox
 California Steel Industries, Inc.,
    Russell W. Stark
 Cardolite Corporation, David Li
 Citicorp/Citibank, JohnJ. Ritter
 Defiance City Schools, Gary Dowler
 Dolco Packaging Corporation, Robert C. Lee
 E Source, Inc., David]. Houghton
 Embarcadero Center, Daryl Berg
 Energy Matrix, Peter Alpert
 First Hawaiian, Inc., Ralph Mench
 Glenview (IL) School District #225,
    Gary Rainier
 Good Samaritan Hospital (Oregon),
    Kenneth Ryker
 Graybar Electric Company, William Trussell
 H&H Industries, Michael Stenwell
 Harco  Distributing Services, Paul Reczek
 Huntington Memorial Hospital (IN),
    Paul Queen
 Illumetek Corporation, James M. Pulk
Jantzen, Inc., Scott Perry
 La Porte Hospital, EdMulhns
 Lights of America, Jose M. Espiro
 Long Island Lighting Company (LILCO),
   Bruce Humenik
 Longs Drug Stores,  David Alexander
Marine Midland Bank, Donald]. Jones
Marion General Hospital, Donald L. Endsley
 Marriott Corporation, Alan Watson
 Maytag, Doug Wilson
 McKeesport Hospital, Tom Patton
 Mercy Hospital (OH), Jim Estes
 Mid Atlantic Lighting, Gene Grassel
 Minneapolis Public Schools & Special
   District #1, Allen L. Johnson
 Motorola Incorporated, Edward W. Lewis
 Multek, Gary W. Wood
 National Westminister Bancorp, Inc.,
   Thomas F. Tobm
 New York Marriott Marquis,
   Charles W. Duffher
 Pennsylvania Hospital, Wendy L. Cody
 Phillips Petroleum, Daniel G. Mann
 Prescolite Controls, Inc., Richard F. Pritchett
 Quad Graphics, Al Berens
 Royal Maccabees Life Insurance Company,
   Robert Hornbacker
 San Diego County, California, Tom DuMont
 San Diego County, California, Mindy Tao
 Sarasota County, Florida, School Board,
   Brent Shuette
 Silverlight Corporation, James W. Zarlenga
 St. Joseph's Hospital, Harold L. Walters
 Superior Light 
-------
  ..../Green
  ^Lights
                               LIGHTING UPGRADE WORKSHOPS
2'12-Day Workshops Featuring:
  Lighting Upgrade Technologies
  Lighting Analysis Software
  Financing Analysis
  Green Lights Reporting
  Lighting Maintenance and Disposal
  Surveyor Ally Exam (on third day)
Name
 Preregistration Form: Green Lights work-
 shops are free and open to the public. Space
 is limited, however; and priority will be given
 to Green Lights Partners. Complete details
 and instructions will be faxed to preregistrants
 within 4 weeks of the workshop date.

	 Title	
                                                                        Register by Phone: Call the Green
                                                                        Lights/Energy Star Hotline at 202 775-6650
                                                                        Register by Fax: Fax this form to the
                                                                        Lighting Services Group at 202 775-6680
                                                                        Register by Mail: Mail to EPA Green Lights
                                                                        (6202J), 401 M Street, SVV Washington, DC 20460
Company/Organization

Address	
City.
Phone
            State

            Fax
                                                                        ZIP Code
       area code
                                                                                 Attendee fax number is very important
                                                                                 to expedite the processing of this form.
Status (Please check one)  G  Partner     G Prospective Partner     G Ally     G Surveyor Ally Candidate/Other
Please Indicate Preferred Workshop*:
G  Chicago, IL May 2-4              Q Detroit, Ml June 29-july I          G  New Brunswick, NJ  August 2-4

G  Raleigh, NC June  14-16           Q Minneapolis, MN  July 19-21

*Please call 202 775-6650 for current workshop information The Surveyor Ally exam will be given on the morning of Day 3 and will conclude by I I '00 a.m
   vvEPA
    United States
    Environmental Protection Agency
    Air and Radiation (6202J)
    Washington, DC 20460


    Official Business
    Penalty for Private Use
    $300
                                                                          BULK RATE
                                                                          Postage and Fees Paid
                                                                          EPA
                                                                          G-35
       Recycled/Recyclable
       Printed with Soy/Canola Ink on paper that
       contains at least 50% recycled fiber

-------