&EPA
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Air and Radiation
6202J
EPA430-N-95-008,
September 1995
Green Lights &
Energy Star Update
Green
Lights
Green Lights
Goes to5chool!
> II3 miHion square feet
Arlington Public Schools (VA) East Maine School District
Boulder Valley School District #63 (IL)
(CO) Santa Cruz Valley Onion
Connetquot Public Schools Hi9h 5ch°o1 District (AZ)
Santa Cruz Valley Onion
etquot Public Schools Hi9h 5ch°o1 District (AZ)
(MY) Was atch County Pub lie
Portland Public Schools 5ch°o15 (°T)
Will You Be Partner/Ally of the Year? See page 12
Also, University of
Minnesota-Twin Cities
Brings the Big Ten into
Green Lights
401 M STREET, SW (6202J), WASHINGTON, DC 20460
ENERGY STAR FAX LINE SYSTEM 202 233-9659
GREEN LIGHTS/ENERGY STAR HOTLINE 202 775-6650 FAX 202 775-6680
-------
G L & E S
UPDATE
PUBLIC
It's Not Just Elementary
Public School Partners enrich students and
the environment through Green Lights
I reen Lights is not just for elementary schools. Public schools across the nation are
\J finding out about the benefits of lighting upgrades for their classrooms, students and
their electricity bills. The following public school Partners deserve all A's for their ener-
gy efficiency efforts.
fiato vijp&fjfctipi *bwft--maferal -^cij^^^Tii
Boulder Valley
School District
Students of all ages have played an
active role in Green Lights in the Boulder
Valley School District in Boulder, CO.
Elementary students helped perform the
lighting surveys by taking footcandle
measurements and counting lightbulbs in
district buildings. Junior and senior archi-
tectural engineering students from the
University of Colorado were hired to
compile all survey information and do
lighting designs.
The upgrades of all 50 district build-
ings have generated an annual energy
savings of more than 4,600,000 kWh (a
45 percent reduction), and prevented the
emissions of more than 4,000 tons of
CO2 per year.
Not only did students participate in
the upgrades, they will learn from them
as well. Beginning this fall, students in
grades K-12 will learn about energy effi-
ciency, recycling, hydropower and other
topics. This will bring Green Lights
results back into the classroom. Because
the different district schools never see
their electricity bills, they feel no
accountability to turn off the lights,
pointed out Colleen Walker, Project
Engineer for the district. "By adding
energy conservation to our curriculum
we are bringing upgrades back into class-
room and tying it all together," she said.
Energy-efficiency themes will not just be
part of the science curriculum either
energy themes can be part of music, art
and theater classes as well. "Energy con-
servation is not above children's heads,"
observed Walker.
Arlington
Public Schools
Arlington Public Schools teaches
more than students and staff about the
benefits of energy efficiency. Through its
Energy Team, Arlington has promoted
energy conservation to the community at
large with articles about the school sys-
tem's activities in The journal newspaper
as well as in PTA and facility newsletters.
The 1995 Green Lights Co-Government
Partner of the Year school system has also
made presentations to community groups
such as Arlingtonians for a Clean
Environment and the Association of
Professional Energy Managers. In addi-
tion, Arlington produced a series of
videos for Cable TV Arlington on its
energy conservation efforts.
Arlington's efforts to educate students
and staff were equally impressive. Among
Arlington's many activities were energy
lessons printed on monthly student lunch
menus, and supporting the Arlington
continued on page 3
2 September 1995
-------
*|fi L & E r'
UPDATE!
continued from page 2
Energy Fair with displays, interactive
energy games, and samples of student
work. In addition, the school district
sponsored an incentive program for
schools to reduce their electricity usage
and publicized winners at a recognition
ceremony. "Staff and students of the
Arlington Public Schools are working
together to increase energy conservation,
decrease utility costs and provide a clean-
er environment," said Jo Ann Daly,
Facility Manager for Arlington Public
Schools. "Through our membership in
the Green Lights program, we have been
able to fulfill all of these goals."
Arlington is now saving over
$172,000 per year on energy costs as a
result of its Green Lights upgrades.
East Maine
School District #63
When the State of Illinois passed leg-
islation allowing state school districts to
enter into performance contracts for
energy-efficient upgrades, East Maine
School District #63 in Des Plaines, IL
wasted no time in seizing this opportuni-
ty. "The guaranteed energy-related im-
provements pay for themselves, improve
the classroom environment, and free
maintenance funds for other necessary
projects," said Jim Reynolds, Director of
Operations and Maintenance. "It is a no-
lose program for the school district."
Taylor Elementary School -Arlington, VA
East Maine entered into a perfor-
mance contract with Green Lights Ally
Honeywell that guarantees annual sav-
ings of $358,000 over a 10-year period.
The district paid for the upgrades with a
long-term lease purchase agreement;
Honeywell guarantees that the monthly
savings will exceed the lease payments. If
savings do not meet the guaranteed lev-
els, Honeywell will write a check to the
school district for the difference. "In this
way the Board of Education is able to pay
for long-term facilities improvements,
and since the savings are guaranteed by
Honeywell, the district cannot lose,"
explained Reynolds.
Honeywell upgraded the school dis-
trict's 450,000 square feet of facility space
and installed new temperature controls
and an energy management system. After
the first six months of the contract, actu-
al savings are well above projected levels.
"The upgrades have already reduced our
utility costs significantly. I'm impressed
that our school board had the foresight
Welcome to following new school Partners
Ann Arfcor Public Schools (MI)
Carson*vatesy School (PA)
' CurtbeMaftd'CQanty Schools (NC)
Dayton Boat! -of Education (OH)
School District (MM)
Preparatory School (NY)
Hilpitas United School District (CA)
Hurray City Schools District (UT)
Norristown Area School District (PA)
Oak Grove School District (CA)
Portland Public Schools (WA)
Springfield School District (PA)
Washington, DC Public Schools
and wisdom to take advantage of legisla-
tion that encourages energy efficiency in
schools," added Reynolds.
Santa Cruz Valley Union
High School District
Through ingenuity and financial
assistance, Santa Cruz Valley Union
High School District in Santa Cruz, AZ,
has not only proven that profitable light-
ing upgrades are possible for rural school
districts but has also become a model for
others. Recently, Santa Cruz experienced
funding cutbacks and turned to Green
Lights as a way to eliminate unnecessary
spending. An energy audit of the district
identified three areas that would result in
significant savings and meet payback cri-
teria: a lighting upgrade with motion-
sensing switches, the installation of an
energy management system and the
installation of a plate and frame heat
exchanger. With little available funding,
Santa Cruz Valley was creative in obtain-
ing financing. The district sought and
received rebates from Arizona Public
Service Company and a grant from the
Department of Energy. The state also
allowed Santa Cruz to add the amount of
one years' lighting savings to its operating
budget.
The upgrades to the 140,000 square-
continued on page 8
September 1995 3
-------
iUPDAilH
Welcome new College and
University Partners
Coahoma Community College (MS)
East Carolina University (NC)
El Paso County Community College
District (TX)
Florida International University (FL)
Northern Illinois University (IL)
Norwich University (VT)
Rennselaer Polytechnic Institute (NY)
Stanford University Academic Facilities (CA)
State University of New York
System (NY)
Tarleton State University (TX)
University of Alaska, Anchorage
University of Alaska, Fairbanks
University of Arizona
University of California, Santa Cruz
University of Minnesota-Twin Cities
University ofTexas Health Science
Center at Houston
University of Minnesota - Twin Cities
Lighting the Way to Higher Learning
University upgrades improve classroom lighting
I olleges and universities are finding Green Lights upgrades an excellent way to save
\>money, save energy and improve lighting quality in campus buildings. Lighting
upgrades are becoming a required course for these Partners.
University of
Missouri-Columbia
By the end of its first year in Green
Lights, the University of Missouri-
Columbia upgraded more than 2.1 million
square feet or more than 35 percent of its
total floor space. These upgrades are
expected to save the university more than
$320,000 annually. To better implement
the program, a Green Lights Building
Coordinator was identified for each build-
ing to facilitate Green Lights implemen-
tation. Completed upgrades include the
installation of occupancy sensors and a
direct lighting control system pro-
grammed to minimize energy use while
allowing variable user schedules.
As the 1995 Green Lights University
Partner of the Year, Missouri believes it is
important to promote its Green Lights
energy-efficiency strategy to students, fac-
ulty, staff and the public. The university
created an Energy Extravaganza, a one-
day energy fair promoting
energy-efficient technolo-
gies with a special emphasis
in 1994 on Green Lights.
The university conducted
an extensive advertising
campaign with Green
Lights and provided infor-
mation on new lighting
technologies in campus
newspapers and newsletters.
University of
MinnesotaTwin Cities
As the first Big Ten school to join
Green Lights, the University of
Minnesota's Twin Cities campus in
Minneapolis/St. Paul has saved an esti-
mated $1.3 million annually in electricity
costs as a result of Green Lights. The
upgrades of 105,000 fluorescent lamps,
and ballasts and 3,500 exit signs have saved
an estimated 25 million kWh annually.
In June 1995 another energy-efficient
lighting project began with the start of the
incandescent upgrade which will replace
incandescent lamps and fixtures through-
out most of the campus' 200 buildings with
compact fluorescents. The projected ener-
gy savings are estimated to be between four
and six million kWh annually.
In addition to energy savings, environ-
mental gains continue to add up as well.
To date, based on the 25 million kWh
saved, the university's investments in ener-
gy-saving products have contributed to an
annual estimated reduction in SO2 emis-
sion by 77 tons and 93 tons of NOX.
The Facilities Management energy
conservation program also includes con-
ducting building energy audits to identify
other savings opportunities. These audits
are identifying cost-effective energy-saving
investments that can be made to upgrade
heating, cooling, and ventilation system
controls, insulate steam piping, adjust fan
4 September 1995
-------
G L & E S
UPDATE
MIT
scheduling and determine where automat-
ed lighting controls are best placed.
Massachusetts Institute
of Technology
At an institution known for its excel-
lence in science and engineering, both
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
students and faculty have learned first-
hand how Green Lights can translate to
large financial savings in just a short peri-
od of time. Bill Wohlfarth, MIT's Green
Lights Implementation Director, has
found that Green Lights is an ideal way
for students to learn about energy issues.
To get students involved in MIT's efforts,
Wohlfarth employed five student interns
to perform the initial lighting survey.
"MIT is very energy conscious as a com-
munity," said Wohlfarth. "We have had
extensive coverage of Green Lights in the
newspapers, and we have used students,
where feasible, to assist in the program's
efforts."
Since joining the program in 1992,
the Cambridge, MA institution has real-
ized annual savings of over $982,000.
MIT has become a leader in the commu-
nity for Green Lights as well. The Partner
was recognized for its 10% Plan achieve-
ments and
hosted the
recognition
ceremony to
honor other
Partners in
the Boston
area. Final-
ly, the school
hosted a
Partner User
Group (PUG)
for partici-
pants to share their Green Lights experi-
ences.
Union
College
Union College, a small, private college in
Schenectady, NY, has found a new approach
to energy savings amidst its on-going Green
Lights upgrades. Howard Billings, Energy
Management Coordinator at the College
wanted to upgrade the outdated emergency
lighting in the dormitories.
In several dormitories, emergency hall-
way lighting was provided by banks of bat-
teries that were 25 to 30 years old. These
battery banks required regular mainte-
nance to provide
emergencies precluded replacement with
compact fluorescent lamps.
Maintenance-free lead-calcium six-bat-
tery systems plus inverters and new 15-
watt, smaller compact fluorescent lamps
provided the answer to Union College's
problems. By using these batteries, Union
College realized an 83 percent reduction in
battery maintenance costs. The cost of the
new system was actually less that the antic-
ipated cost of older battery replacement.
The new compact fluorescent lamps pro-
vide a 10,000-hour life expectancy com-
pared to the 750 hours for incandescents,
and they fit into existing fixtures. These
upgrades reduced electrical consumption
by over 12,000 kWh and electricity costs
by $2,200 per building annually.
Eastern Illinois
University
Eastern Illinois University (EIU) in
Charleston, IL, took advantage of the
Governor's Energy Efficiency Pilot
Initiative to finance their upgrades and
other energy conservation projects. The
pilot initiative utilizes an innovative third-
party financing approach which involves
the private issuance of certificates of par-
continued on page 13
even reduced levels
of safety coverage,
and replacement
costs were high.
Inefficient incan-
descent lighting
provided normal
night-time and
emergency light-
ing, but fixture size
and the direct cur-
rent from the bat-
tery source during
Union College
September 1995 5
-------
UPDATE
CORNER
Straight As
School district gives Green Lights Ally
an A+ on lighting upgrades
I
\ tah's Wasatch County School District
Wasatch County School District's
Upgrade Report Card
\y5took its energy-efficiency lessons to
heart and invested in the future of its stu-
dents and the environment by joining the
Green Lights program. "The Green
Lights program enabled us to install the
most energy-efficient lighting while
ensuring an adequate payback," said Dr.
Henry Jolley, Superintendent of Wasatch
County School District and the Green
Lights Implementation Director.
Lighting Maintenance &
Service, Inc. (LMS)
President Chris Boren
heard about Wasatch's
project, presented the
district's school board
with a detailed pro-
posal using the Green
Lights approach, and
won the contract.
LMS's upgrade pro-
posal included sur-
veys, lighting design,
financial analyses,
installation, re-
porting, and coor-
dination of lamp and
ballast disposal. An
exemplary Green Lights
Ally, LMS delivered all of
these services and completed the upgrade
within a year.
But, for a school district, funding for a
lighting upgrade is never a given. Bank
One of Arizona provided the financing for
the Wasatch upgrades through a program
set up specifically for schools. The elec-
tricity cost savings from more efficient
lighting will help repay the bank loan, and
a bond referendum will cover the remain-
ing amount.
LMS surveyed the school buildings
and upgraded a total of 292,500 square
feet. Most fixtures were relamped from
34-watt T12 lamps to 32-watt T8's. Old
standard magnetic ballasts were changed
to electronic, and incandescent fixtures
were changed to compact fluorescents.
High-intensity discharge lamps replaced
fluorescent lamps at one of the four gym-
nasiums that were upgraded.
LMS coordinated the disposal of all
lamps and ballasts removed from Wasatch
buildings. Lighting Resources, a Green
Lights Manufacturer Ally, disposed of the
lamps in a hazardous waste landfill. "LMS
helped us meet our goal of removing light-
ing products to make a safer environment
for our students and did it in a cooperative
and timely manner," said Jolley. In addi-
tion to the safe disposal of lamps and bal-
lasts, the school district is proud of the
environmental achievements from its
lighting upgrades: the reduction of air pol-
lution equivalent to the removal of 69 cars
from U.S. highways or the planting of 142
acres of trees.
The work done by LMS for the
Wasatch County School District is one of
many examples of Green Lights Allies and
Partners working together for financial
benefits and environmental results. EPA's
Green Lights program offers win-win
opportunities for all of its participants. For
more information, please contact the
Green Lights Ally Hotline at 202 293-
4527. H
6 ' September 1995
-------
G L & E S
UPDATE
ENERGY STAR BUILDINGS
Making the CFC Phaseout Profitable
Stage 5: HVAC Plant Improvements
To introduce Green Lights participants to the ENERGY STAR Buildings program, the
Update is documenting the success of Showcase Buildings participants in each stage of program
implementation. This article, the seventh and final in the series, describes Stage 5: HVAC Plant
Improvements.
Stage 5 focuses on upgrades to heating likely brought about signifi-
and cooling plants and peripheral cant reductions in cooling
equipment. These final upgrades take
advantage of the load reductions achieved
in Stages 1 through 3; reductions that may
allow for the downsizing of heating and
cooling equipment.
STAGE 5 UPGRADES
Cooling Plant Upgrades
Building owners are presently facing
the phaseout of chlorofluorocarbon
(CFC) refrigerants on January 1,1996. As
required by the 1990 Clean Air Act
Amendments, the refrigerants currently
Ml,
er be
[Heeded.
Stance with these regulations, how-
bould be viewed as an opportunity
to "JftCrease the energy efficiency of a
bifKfeg. By implementing the ENERGY
Buildings staged approach along
, j(^^^tt**t plan, the
out can be (Own-
load requirements. Therefore,
purchasing a smaller, more
energy-efficient chiller can
lower equipment costs fur-
ther. If a replacement is not
possible, the chiller can usu-
ally be upgraded to use an
alternative refrigerant, often
still increasing efficiency. At
Mobil Research and Development, a
Showcase building, three CFC-11 chillers
were replaced with energy efficient
HCFC-123 chillers. This resulted in an
annual energy savings of 990,000 kWh
and an annual cost savings of $52,000.
Previous ENERGY STAR upgrades resulted
in a cooling load reduction of 212 tons.
Therefore, Mobil Research and Develop-
ment was able to purchase chillers smaller
than previously required.
Heating Plant Upgrades
Showcase Mobil Research
Participant and Development
Type Of Upgrade High-efficiency
HCFC-123 chillers
VSDs on cooling
tower fans and
chilled water pumps
Square Feet 340,000
Upgrade Cost $405,000
Annual Cost Savings $52,000
IRR 1 3%
Annual Energy Savings (kWh)990,000
Mobil/
Reston
VSDs on cooling
tower fans
285,000
$8,400
$2,400
29%
97,000
ers should prepare
by developing a
plan that includes a co
'WBng existing systems,
$nt» Upgrading systems.
*nergy-efficieat
opportunity for energy savings is a com-
plete system replacement. A move to a
newer, energy-efficient boiler means in-
creased heating surface area and improved
controls for fuel and air flows over the
range of load conditions. A system which
includes several small boilers operating in
combination, is even better, improving
overall efficiency to 90 percent. Upgrading
existing boilers can also dramatically
improve efficiency. Installing new burners
and/or controls can extend the useful life of
heating systems and reduce emissions.
In addition to heating and cooling
Approximately 20 percent of all com- plant equipment, Stage 5 upgrades cover
mercial buildings use boilers for space improvements to peripheral equipment.
hear3|igV1v15Ml<£ the combustion efficiency Variable speed drives
fl
of o^tebeiters is generally between 65-75
perct«frittegident boilers can fcrvS effi-
* * Xf
40 percent. Poorly ope*-
ns
be
o "i'
aji "stiilled wat|r''piin|jt,
*HM«c mam, aad
"<
sai
«~ ^5T?Wi^jTJ*"**T'"*% tj+w-w^fj
those,
caft 1cm
**-. ^ *£."» ^ . .^ S * ~^ t» %*.^&Li ^
»»
-------
G L & E S
UPDATE
I N T H E
H T
Green Lights & ENERGY STAR
Go Online
l\ s everyone jumps on the Information
/ I Superhighway, Green Lights &
ENERGY STAR program information is
now available on the Internet's World
Wide Web via the EPAs Public Access
Server. Program participants, potential
participants and other interested Internet
users can now access a wide variety of
information about programs, including
Memorandums of Understanding
(MOUs), fact sheets, software tools, and
publication listings. EPA programs with
active home pages include: Green Lights,
ENERGY STAR programs, ENERGY STAR
Buildings, ENERGY STAR Office Equip-
ment and others. Information about the
College and University sector of Green
Lights including the University fact sheet
and participant list is now available.
Current issues of the Update can be
accessed as well from the home pages. All
programs can be reached from the EPA
home page, the Office of Air and
Radiation home page, or the Atmospheric
Pollution Prevention Division's (APPD)
home page. Pages can also be reached
directly. E-mail questions and queries can
be directed to the "EPA Manager" by
clicking on the hotlink. All pages are opti-
mized for Netscape 1.1, Mosaic 2.0 Beta 4
or better. Our Internet addresses (all are
case sensitive) are:
EPA home:
APPD home:
ES Programs:
ES Buildings:
ES Office Equipment:
Green Lights:
GL College & University:
http://www.epa.gov
http://www.epa.gov/docs/GCDOAR/OAR-APPD.html
http://www.epa.gov/docs/GCDOAR/EnergyStar.html
.../GCDOAR/esb-home.html
More t>°Ses wi"
be posted as
more information
.. ./GCDOAR/esc-home.html
.. ./GCDOAR/GreenLights-html
.../GCDOAR/college.html
is made available.
continued from page 3
foot school resulted in a 48 percent
reduction in electricity usage and an
annual savings of almost $15,000.
Santa Cruz also used a unique strate-
gy for installing its upgrades. The bus
driver staff was used to do the work over
the summer, which was an in-house cost-
effective strategy that also created sum-
mer employment for valued school-year
staff. The district's hard work earned
them the 1995 Green Lights Co-
Government Partner of the Award.
Connetquot
School District
When Connetquot Central School
District in Bohemia, NY joined Green
Lights in July of 1994, Keith Anderson,
Director of Plant and Facilities saw an
opportunity to enhance the educational
environment of the schools by providing
higher lighting quality while lowering
Connetquot's operating costs.
In order to lessen the burden on com-
munity taxpayers, Anderson aggressively
pursued creative financing options. In
total, Anderson has secured $340,000 in
grant money, despite its decreasing lack
of availability. Anderson also funded one
of Connetquot's projects with $70,000 in
grant money from the New York State
Energy Office, and $25,000 from Long
Island Lighting Company, leaving only a
$45,000 district outlay. This project
yielded annual energy savings of
$55,000, with less than a one-year pay-
back. And to continue to cut energy
continued on page 13
8 ' September 1995
-------
GREEN LIGHTS IMPLEMENTAIIUN KEHUKI
OMB # 2060-0255 Exp 3/31/96
SURVEY REPORT
(fill in sections 1,2,4,6, and 12 below)
COMPLETED PROJECT REPORT
(fill in sections 1-12 below)
Date.
Page of
(attach additional pages as needed)
\1. FACILITY INFORMATION
Company Name:
Facility Name
Facility address:
City/St./ZipCode
Facility type*
New Construction?
Yes No
2. LIGHTING FIXTURES BEFORE UPGRADE (*use codes on back)
Fixture
Type'
Fixture
Quantity
Lamp
Type'
Lamp
Wattage
Lamps/
Fixture
Ballast
Type'
Lamps/
Ballast
Wattage
per Fixture
Lighting
houn/year
4. LIGHTING CONTROLS BEFORE UPGRADE
Typel'
Quantity
Type 2'
Quantify
Type 3*
Quantity
6. MAINTENANCE METHODS BEFORE UPGRADE
Group relamping?
Yes No Fixture cleaning?
Yes No
Facility Manager:
Telephone No./FAX No.
Total Floarspace for this Facility:
Floorspace included in this report:
Is this the FIRST report sent to EPA for this floorspace?
sqft.
sq.ft.
Yes No
3. LIGHTING FIXTURES AFTER UPGRADE
Upgrade
Type'
Fixture
Type'
Fixture
Quantity
Lamp
Type'
Lamp
Wattage
Lamps/
Fixture
IBS*.
(*use codes on back)
Lamps/
Wattage
per Fixture
Lighting
hours/year
5. LIGHTING CONTROLS AFTER UPGRADE
Type I*
Quantity
Type 2*
Quantity
Type 3'
Quantity
7. MAINTENANCE METHODS AFTER UPGRADE
Group relamping?
'Yes No Fixture cleaning?
Yes
No
8. COMMENTS
9. PROJECT COSTS
Survey
Administrative
Materials
Installation Labor
Disposal/Recycling Costs
Other Costs
Total Project Cost
Rebates/Grants
«OO (11/28/94)
10. LIGHTING SAVINGS
Lighting Load Reduced
Electricity Reduction
% Lighting Savings
Energy Cost Savings
Internal Rate of Return
kWh/yr
/«
S/yr
11. IMPLEMENTATION METHODS:
Survey/Analysis*
Equipment Provider*
Installation Method*
Financing Method*
* use codes on the back for these entries
12. SIGNATURE
Are you? GL Implementation Director
Facility Manager Other
Send to: Maria Theesen, Green Lights, US-EPA 6202J, 401 M St. SW, Washington DC 20460 , or
FAX to (202) 233-9569. For questions, call the Green Lights technical hotline: 202-775-6650
92009
-------
GREEN LIGHTS IMPLEMENTATION REPORT CODES
Facility Type
1000 Office
1001 Warehouse
1002 Industrial/Manufacturing
1003 Retail sales
1004 HealthCare
1005 Lodging (hotels, dormitories etc.)
1006 Assembly (churches, auditoriums, etc.)
1007 Education (classrooms)
1008 Food sales and service
1009 Parking Garage
1010 Laboratory
1011 Outdoor
Fixture Type
13 Fluorescent- commercial- no lens
14 Fluorescent- commercial-clear lens
15 Fluorescent-commercial-translucent lens
16 Fluorescent - deep cell louver
17 Fluorescent - small cell louver
18 Fluorescent-industrial-open fixture
19 Fluorescent- industrial-enclosed fixture
20 Incandescent- downlight ("can")
21 Incandescent-spotlight/floodlight
22 Incandescent-decorative/sconce
23 Incandescent-pendant fixture
24 Incandescent-general illumination
25 Incandescent-exterior/landscape
26 Incandescent - track lighting
27 HID-outdoor-cobra head
28 HID-outdoor-shoe box
29 HID-outdoor-wallpak/flood
30 HID-outdoor-landscape
31 HID-outdoor-sports lighting
32 HID-indoor-high bay
33 HID-indoor-low bay
34 HID-indoor-recessed commercial
35 HID-indoor-sports lighting
36 Exit sign-incandescent
37 Exit sign-fluorescent
38 Exit sign-LED
39 Exit sign-electroluminescent
40 Exit sign- tritium
41 Exit sign- luminescent
42 Indirect
Installation by
2030 in-house staff
2031 contractor
2032 utility
Lamp Type
54 T-8
55 T-10
56 T-12 Energy Saving
57 T-12 Cathode cut-out
58 T-12 High Lumen
59 T-12 Standard
60 T-12 High Output (SOOma)
61 T-12VHO(1500ma)
62 T-17VHO(1500ma)
63 T-5 single ended
64 Compact twin-tube
65 Compact quad-tube
66 Compact-integrated ballast
67 Compact-circular
68 Incandescent-general service (A, PS,T)
69 Incandescent-Reflector (R, PAR, ER)
70 Incandescent-decorative
71 Halogen-general service
72 Halogen-reflector (R.PAR, MR)
73 Halogen-tubular
74 HID-mercury vapor
75 HID-metal halide
76 HID-high pressure sodium
77 HID-white-HPS
78 Low pressure sodium
79 T-12 Slimline
B»D*st Type
80 Fluorescent-old standard magnetic
81 Fluorescent-efficient magnetic
82 Fluorescent-hybrid/cathode cutout
83 Fluorescent-standard electronic
84 Fluorescent-integrated electronic
85 Fluorescent-extended output electronic
86 Fluorescent-partial output electronic
87 Fluorescent-dimming electronic
88 Fluorescent-step dimming electronic
89 Fluorescent-HO standard magnetic
90 Fluorescent-HO (SOOma) electronic
91 Fluorescent-VHO standard magnetic
92 Fluorescent-compact magnetic
93 Fluorescent-compact electronic
94 HID-magnetic
95 HID-electronic
96 Fluorescent-HO efficient magnetic
97 Fluorescent-VHO efficient magnetic
Upgrade Type
110 Relamponly
111 Delamp only
112 Relamp and reballast
113 Specular reflector/delamp
114 Reflector/Reballast
115 New Lens/Reflector/Reballast
116 New lens/louver
117 New fixture
118 Convert Incand to Fluorescent or HID
119 Task Lighting
Control Type
100 Manual switching
101 Manual dimming
102 Occupancy sensor
103 Timed switching
104 Timed dimming
105 Daylight switching
106 Daylight dimming
107 Panel level dimming
108 Panel level EMS
109 Power reducer
Survey/Analysis by
2010 in-house personnel
2011 independent consultant
2012 electrical contractor
2013 utility representative
2014 equipment supplier
2015 lighting management company
2016 energy services company
2017 Green Lights Surveyor Ally
2018 Architect
2019 Lighting Designer
2024 Electrical Distributor
Equipment Provided by
2020 lighting equipment supplier
2021 lighting management company
2022 utility
2023 contractor
Financing by
2040 internal funds
2041 conventional loan
2042 utility
2043 lease/lease-purchase
2044 shared savings
2045 other
POLLUTION PREVENTION
You may want to estimate the
pollution prevention of this
project for your own use. Use the
following formulas and factors.
CO2: kWh/yr x emission = Ibs/yr
saved factor
SO2: kWh/yr x emission = g/yr
saved factor
NOx: kWh/yr x emission = g/yr
saved factor
EPA Regional Emission Factors (see note below)
REGION 1: CT, MA, ME, NH, Rl, VT
Emission per CO2 SO2 NOx
kWh saved: 1.1 4.0 1.4
REGION 2: NJ, NY, PR, VI
Emission per CO2 SO2 NOx
kWh saved: 1.1 3.4 1.3
REGION 3: DC, DE, MD, PA, VA, WV
Emission per CO2 SO2 NOx
kWh saved: 1.6 8.2 2.6
REGION 4: AL, FL, GA, KY, MS, NC, SC, TN
Emission per CO2 SO2 NOx
kWh saved: 1.5 6.9 2.5
REGION 5. IL, IN, MI, MN, OH, WI
Emission per CO2 SO2 NOx
kWh saved: 1.8 10.4 3.5
REGION 6: AR, LA, NM, OK, TX
Emission per CO2 SO2 NOx
kWh saved: 1.7 2.2 25
REGION 7: IA, KS7MO, NE
Emission per CO2 SO2 NOx
kWh saved. 2.0 8.5 3.9
REGION 8: CO, MT, ND, SD, UT, WY
Emission per CO2 SO2 NOx
kWh saved: 2.2 3.3 3.2
REGION 9 AZ, CA, HI, NV, Guam, Am Samoa
Emission per CO2 SO2 NOx
kWh saved: 10 1.1 1.5
REGION 10: AK, ID, OR, WA
Emission per CO2 SO2 NOx
kWh saved: O.I 0.5 0.3
Note: State pollution emission factors are
aggregated by EPA region Factors for U.S.
territories are national average emission factors.
See the Green Lights Lighting Upgrade Manual.
pnge 2 of 6200 (9/30/94)
-------
TIP OF THE MONTH
G L & E S
UPDATE
On the Job Training
Using student interns
for lighting surveys
reliable survey is the first step in
/ limplementing profitable lighting
upgrades. In order to conduct a survey,
facility managers have a preliminary
choice to make: dedicate staff time to
training and surveying or hire a profes-
sional surveyor. Because staff may not
have the extra time or expertise to con-
duct surveys and professional surveyors
may be too expensive, a third option may
offer a new solution: student interns.
Several Green Lights Partners have suc-
cessfully used interns to survey existing
lighting systems and analyze potential
Green Lights upgrades.
Economic Reasons
for Using Interns:
State of Arkansas
Many non-profit and government
organizations are faced with limited
resources to fund and complete lighting
surveys. The State of Arkansas used
interns to help ease the financial burden
of surveying its more than 40 million
square feet. Knowing that the state oper-
ates with a lean staff under a tight budget,
Chris Benson, Arkansas' Green Lights
Implementation Director, realized that he
could not use contractors or his own
employees to survey the facilities. With
this in mind, he contacted Steve
Menhart, a professor of electronics at the
University of Arkansas at Little Rock to
recruit six students to work as interns.
Benson took advantage of Green
Lights to train the interns about lighting
technologies. Menhart and his students
attended a Lighting Upgrade Workshop
to learn about technologies, applications,
and the Green Lights program. Benson
also utilized his Account Manager's ser-
vices to provide a Q&A session, followed
by a surveying lesson. With the guidance
of the Green Lights Account Manager,
the interns surveyed a building. After lit-
tle training, the interns were surveying
without a problem.
"The benefit of using interns is three-
fold," according to Menhart. "The stu-
dents are learning a trade that will make
them more competitive in the job market,
the state will be able to implement prof-
itable upgrades, and the Green Lights
program is helping the environment
breathe easier."
More Time for
Implementing Upgrades:
University of Miami
Employing interns allows a facility
manager and the engineering staff more
time to implement upgrades. Some orga-
nizations are not as large as Arkansas, but
still require assistance. Jim Durante,
Green Lights Implementation Director
for the University of Miami hired Rajnish
Kashyap, a university student, to help.
Durante, already knowledgeable about
lighting technologies and Green Lights,
provided Kashyap the necessary training.
Kashyap surveyed over 900,000 square
feet of the facility in three weeks and used
Report Kale to report progress to EPA.
Kashyap also provides Durante the data,
allowing Durante more time to concen-
trate on specifying the upgrades, selecting
contractors, and other duties.
Financing
Options:
City of Ada
If paying interns is a problem, there
may be several possible options at your
organization's disposal. The City of Ada,
OK turned to Oklahoma State University
for help in performing its lighting
upgrades. Ada did not want to hire an
engineer to perform the lighting analysis
because it would have required additional
tax dollars. Ada hired graduate student
interns from Oklahoma State who com-
pleted surveys of almost the entire city.
Because surveying was part of the gradu-
ate students curriculum, interns were paid
through Oklahoma State, requiring the
City to pay for only a few miscellaneous
expenses.
Colleges and universities have the
option of offering credit or federal work
study positions to interns. Morehead
State University in Kentucky will be
using a work study student to perform its
surveys. The student will be paid through
federal money allocated for work study
students.
By spending less time and money on
surveys, organizations have more time to
spend on installing improvements.
Students receive real world experience
that can give them a competitive edge
when looking for a job. And the environ-
ment benefits as well from less CO2, SO2,
NOX emissions. P*
September 1995 9
-------
G L & E S
UPDATE
(left to right) EPA's Stanley L Laskowski and
Thomas Jefferson University's David L Dobbins
Thomas Jefferson University
Joins Green Lights
homas Jefferson University in
Philadelphia kicked off its Green
Lights participation at a signing ceremony
on June 7, 1995. Acting EPA
Region 3 Administrator
Stanley L. Laskowski signed as
did David L. Dobbins,
Associate Vice President for
Physical Resources at Thomas
Jefferson University. Also pre-
sent from Thomas Jefferson
were Dan Vallieu, Plant
Operations; Richard Alberto,
Hospital Administration;
Martha Anderson, Environmental Health
and Safety, and members of the
University's Energy Team. Ellen Fishman,
EPA Region Three Green Lights
Coordinator, was also in attendance.
"Thomas Jefferson is proud to be par-
ticipating in the Green Lights program,"
said Dobbins. "We are committed to
reducing our energy consumption, pro-
tecting the environment, and saving
money." The University committed
approximately four million square feet to
be upgraded with energy-efficient lighting
technologies. Ri
NEW
I PA NTS
Rensselaer
SweetO^Tomatoes.
The Salad Buffet Restaurant.
Cookson Fibers, Inc.
Ratohs
Green Lights Welcomes New Participants
J-orty-one (41) new participants joined Green Lights welcomes its new
I Green Lights in June to take advantage participants and looks forward to work-
of the benefits of energy-efficient lighting ing with them. If your organization
upgrades. Green Lights now has over would like more information about
1,850 participants, committed to energy
savings and pollution prevention through
efficient lighting.
the program, please call the Green
Lights/ENERGY STAR Hotline at 202
775-6650.
PARTNERS (27) Burger King Corporation City of Chicago City ofLotnpoc Cookson Fibers
El Paso County Community College District Florida International University Garden Fresh Restaurant
Corporation H Henry General Hospital Illinois Army National Guard MCI Telecommunications
Corp./Bensenville MCI Telecommunications Corp /Willow Springs One Town Center Associates Panarem,
Inc Ralphs Grocery Company Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute B Siebe Environmental Controls Somerset
HI//S Hotel Stanford University Academic Facilities St State University of New York System larleton State
University H United Energy of Missouri Inc. U.S. Army/Aberdeen Proving Ground University of Alaska,
Anchorage University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Utah State Hospital Veterans Affairs
Medical Center, Indianapolis H Washington DC Public Schools ALLIES (9) AC/VIE Electric Corporation,
Transformer Division Beard Campbell Company City of St Charles Electric Utility Wt Conservalite
Technologies, Inc £ Sam Jones Distributor, Inc Nevada Power Company Systems Solutions of Georgia, Inc.
Taylor Electric Supply WESCO Distribution, Inc ENDORSERS (5) Delaware State Chamber of
Commerce Earth Share Land-of-Sky Regional Council Lorax Environmental Club-NCSU
The Oregon State Superintendent of Public Administration
10 September 1995
-------
G L & E S
UPDATE
The ABCs of Classroom Lighting Upgrades
Improved lighting quality
enhances the educational experience
I lassroom lighting upgrades offer sig-
Vriificant potential for reducing operat-
ing and maintenance costs for school
administrations. By following the guide-
lines listed below, you can help protect the
environment while enhancing the quality
of the education experience.
ount
The amount of light required in a
space is dependent on three factors: the
age of the people occupying the space, the
type of task being performed and how
critical it is that the task be performed
accurately. Classrooms provide several
challenges for creating efficient and effec-
tive lighting because of the many different
tasks performed in these spaces.
Classroom lighting should meet the high-
est footcandle needs for reading, writing
and other tasks, but it should also be
adjustable. A flexible lighting system will
provide for the needs of students while
saving energy.
last Upgrades &
ther Options
To achieve lighting quality and save
electricity at the same time, consider the
following lighting upgrade options.
Lamps and Ballast Upgrade
Source efficacy is the amount of
lumens generated per watts consumed,
and it depends on the lamp and ballast
working together efficiently. Two
lamp/ballast upgrades include:
T8 Lamp/Ballast System: This system is
extremely efficient producing approximate-
ly 90 lumens per watt when used in a 4-
lamp electronic ballast.
T10 Lamp: The use of TlO lamps
instead of standard cool-white T12 lamps
will increase light levels by about 20 per-
cent. When used with T12 electronic bal-
lasts, the efficacies of TlO applications are
comparable to those for T8 applications.
Lens and Louver Upgrade
Fixture efficiency can be significantly
improved by replacing translucent diffusers
or small-cell louvers with clear acrylic lens-
es or large-cell parabolic louvers. Louvers
provide superior glare control and high
visual comfort compared with lens-diffuser
systems. They also can eliminate the glare
reflected on computer screens. Both deep-
cell and small-cell louvers are available for
use with existing fixtures.
Luminaire Replacement
Instead of upgrading individual lumi-
naire components, consider the labor sav-
ings and quality improvements that may
be achieved with new luminaires that fea-
ture high-efficiency components.
Deep Cell Parabolic Louver Replace
existing luminaires with new luminaires that
contain efficient components such as T8
lamps, electronic ballasts and large cell par-
abolic louvers. The results will be low glare,
high-efficiency, and uniform distribution.
Deep-cell parabolic louvers are particularly
appropriate in classrooms with computers.
Indirect Luminaires These luminaires
distribute at least 90 percent of the emit-
ted light upwards to reflect off the ceiling,
providing uniform, diffused lighting.
Because the light sources are completely
shielded from view, indirect systems pro-
vide relatively high visual comfort.
Indirect lighting is ideal for libraries
because it provides even illumination on
vertical surfaces.
Controls
Controls offer the greatest energy sav-
ings potential for the classroom. Schools
have a large portion of space that is unoc-
cupied at various times during the day and
can benefit greatly from control systems.
At Catholic University in Washington,
D.C., Green Lights Implementation
Director Bob Burhenn installed light log-
gers in fixtures around the Catholic cam-
pus to determine the number of hours the
lights were actually used per week. One
lecture hall's lights logged 72 hours but it
was only occupied 18 hours that week.
The hall was empty for 75 percent of the
lighting hours. Using occupancy sensors
and scheduling controls can significantly
reduce your lighting needs, and if your
space has many windows, daylight dim-
ming can further reduce your energy con-
sumption.
For more information about lighting
upgrade technologies, contact the Green
Lights/ENERGY STAR Hotline at 202 775-
6650. H
September 1995 11
-------
G L & E" S
UPDATE
ANNOUNCING THE 1996 PA RT N
Looking for a Few
Good Partners and Allies
You could be the
1996 Partner/A///
of the Year. Mail in
your entry today!
To apply...
Mail us the entry form on the facing
page, along with your supporting mate-
rials. Official entry packets will be avail-
able Sept. 30, 1995, All submitted
materials become property of EPA and
will not be returned.
Recognition You Deserve
Many Partners and Allies in Green
Lights are setting examples of environ-
mental leadershipand this competition
is one way for the EPA to recognize
them. If your organization has done good
work, why not apply? It's easy, and if you
win, EPA will highlight your achieve-
ment in an outreach campaign through-
out 1996.
Eligibility
You must be an active participant in
the Green Lights program. Achievements
over the entire course of your Green
Lights membership will be evaluated.
You must have submitted your total
organizational square footage to the EPA.
You must have completed upgrades
in at least 20% of your upgradeable
space.
You must have reported your upgrades
in a format acceptable to EPA.
If you have won this competition the
previous year you must wait a year before
recompeting.
Partner of the Year Award Categories
For 1996 Partner of the Year there will
be 10 categories:
Large Corporation (over 10 mil. sq. ft.)
Corporation (1-10 mil. sq. ft.)
Small Corporation (100,000-1 mi sq. ft.)
Small Business (under 100,000 sq. ft.)
Non-profit Organization
University/College
Small Hospital
Large Hospital
Government
Public School
1996 Ally of the Year Award Categories:
Manufacturer Ally
Lighting Management Company Ally
Utility Ally Distributor Ally
Evaluation
Partner of the Year Contestants:
Implementation: 60% (only completed
upgrades will be evaluated). Quality
upgrades are the hallmark of an out-
standing Green Lights Partner.
Communications/Outreach Effort:
30%. Publicizing the program is an
important component too.
Other Special Endeavors: 10%. For
example, these might include hosting a
workshop.
Ally of the Year Contestants:
The different Ally categories will be
judged on the same criteria, but with dif-
ferent emphases, as befits their particular
industries (see table on page 13).
Timeline
The EPA will be accepting applica-
tions until December 1,1995. All reports
of completed upgrades to be considered
part of your application must be received
by this date as wejt
By December 21,1995, you
-------
LLY OF THE YEAR COMPETITION
G L & E S
UPDATE
1996 Application Form
Partner/Ally of the Year
Organization Name,
Contact Person
Title
Street Address
City
Telephone
I am applying for this category:
1996 Partner of the Year
LJ Large Corporation (greater than 10
million square feet)
LJ Corporation (I to 10 million square feet)
[J Small Corporation (100,000 to I mil-
lion square feet)
Q Small Business (0 to 99,999 square
feet)
1996 Ally of the Year
LJ Lighting Manufacturer
LJ Lighting Management Company
_State_
Fax
_Zip
LJ Non-Profit Organization
LJ Government (including local, county
and federal government institutions
and public schools)
Q University
LJ Large Hospital
Q Small Hospital
LJ Lighting Distributor
Q Utility Ally
Any Partner or Ally is eligible for an award if they:
* are an active participant in Green
Lights
* have submitted total square footage
information about their organization
* have completed upgrades in at least
20% of their upgradeable space
have reported their upgrades in a for-
mat acceptable to EPA
have not won Partner nor Ally of the
Year in 1995
ALLY OF THE YEAR CRITERIA
Manufacturer
Implementation (Completed Upgrades)
Innovation (tech/service)
Promotion of Green Lights
Financing work/innovation
Work/report for Partners
40%
20%
25%
5%
10%
LMC
40%
5%
25%
10%
20%
Utility
40%
5%
30%
15%
10%
Distributor
40%
5%
40%
5%
10%
University Successes, continued from page 5
ticipation (COPs). The State will repay the
COPs from guaranteed savings over the 10
year term of its agreement with the Energy
Service Company (ESCO). "This arrange-
ment allowed EIU to proceed with imple-
mentation of its energy conservation
project in an era of limited state capital
budgets," said Gary Reed, EIU's Utilities
Manager. "Other schools should look for
similar opportunities in their state." The
university is in the process of upgrading
1.3 million square feet of campus space
including academic buildings and resi-
dence halls, with another one million
square feet in the planning stages.
To further increase its energy savings,
EIU utilizes an energy management sys-
tem to control the heating, ventilation,
and air conditioning (HVAC) system
when buildings are not in use. For exam-
ple, the campus recreation center is closed
from 10 pm to 7 am so EIU staff pro-
grammed the EMS to stop the HVAC
system at closing and restart it just before
opening to maximize energy savings. EIU
expects to save 2.5 million kWh annually
from their upgrades or approximately
$150,000. Pi
Public School Successes, continued from page 8
costs, Connetquot has signed on as an
ENERGY STAR Buildings Partner.
Anderson has actively promoted the use
of energy-efficient lighting both within
Connetquot and in neighboring
communities. At Connetquot, Anderson
has distributed Green Lights literature and
the Green Lights occupancy sensor video
to teachers in order to provide an
educational opportunity for students. He
has also spoken at local school district
facility manager meetings to promote the
Green Lights message. F*
September 1995 13
-------
G L & E S
UPDATE
GLID PROFILE
Green Lights 101
Hofstra campus upgrades
show that Green Lights works
Right, Theresa
Greis, below,
Hofstra's Axmn
Library
o date, Green Lights has helped
I Hofstra University in Hempstead, NY,
save $146,585 in annual energy costs and
reduced lighting electricity savings by 68
percent. "At Hofstra, we started by
upgrading one building, proving that the
technologies and savings were real,"
explained Teresa Greis, Energy Manager
at Hofstra. "Once we knew that Green
Lights worked, we proceeded with confi-
dence on the rest of our upgrades." The
Update recently spoke to Greis about her
work and Hofstra's Green Lights efforts.
What are some of the challenges you have
faced while running a large facility?
Hofstra University covers 238 acres with
more than 2.6 million square feet of facili-
ties. One of the problems with such a large
facility is standardizing equipment. Prior to
upgrading the building lighting system, one
might find a mix of cool white and warm
white T12 lamps and a mix of magnetic
and electronic ballasts. The upgrade
enabled Hofstra to eliminate some old
equipment, reduce stocking requirements
and standardize equipment. As a result,
lighting specifications for all new construc-
tion renovations have been written.
How many facilities and square feet have
you upgraded thus far?
To date, the University has upgraded
1,480,000 square feet with an annual sav-
ings of 5,250,000 kWh. During 1993,
Hofstra upgraded over 700,000 square feet
including six dormitories, the library, a
classroom building and the law school
building. The upgrades in the three build-
ings resulted in an annual load reduction of
2,776,000 kWh. The next phase of
upgrading 390,000 square feet is expected
to start in the fall. The final 560,000 square
feet is expected to be upgraded next year.
How important are environmental efforts
to Hofstra's administration?
Hofstra's campus is a registered Arbor-
etum accredited by the American Associa-
tion of Botanical Gardens and Arboreta.
The administration is very concerned with
environmental issues. A university-wide
recycling program has been in place for five
years. By joining Green Lights, Hofstra
found an additional way to enhance its
commitment to protect the environment.
How important is the public education
side of your energy management efforts?
The Hofstra community is always
informed of energy projects going on
across the campus. Articles appear in the
monthly publication, as was the case with
the start of our 1995 upgrade project.
When the library was upgraded in 1993, a
newsletter described the project and invit-
ed staff to visit the facility and report their
comments back to the physical plant.
What are you planning for the future?
Future projects at Hofstra include the
completion of all lighting upgrades. After
that, we will examine energy saving tech-
nologies in our HVAC system. Hofstra is
also investigating the installation of a 2.3
megawatt cogeneration plant.
I How do you see your job evolving in the
next few years?
I envision continuing along the same
path, and that is to investigate energy sav-
ing technologies, obtain funding, manage
the project, and document savings
achieved through Green Lights. fWi
14 September 1995
-------
G L & E S
UPDATE
COM
UPGRADES
June Upgrades
I ongratulations to the following program participants who submitted implementation
V^reports for completed upgrades during the month of June.
ALCOA, Steve Schmidt
Allergan,/ow Reed
American Express, Michele Spiess
American Standard, Daniel Elliott
Associated Students of UC Berkeley,
Jeffrey Peeks
Baltimore County, Maryland,
F. Douglas Johnson
Big Beam Emergency Systems,
PaulMarkee
Buffalo State College, Frank Wenske
Carrier Corporation North America,
Charles Veley
Celeste Industries Corporation,
PaulLentz
Chestnut Hill Hospital,
Benjamin F. Antrim
Citizens Bank of Maryland,
Richard L. Prosser
Community Hospital-
Anderson/Madison Co.,
John A Wesley
Danaher Corporation, Sue Season
Eastalco Aluminum Company,
John Ritenour
Eli Lilly & Company, Gavin Hadley
Energy Simulation Specialists,
Emily Tuzson
FHP, Inc., Walter F. Lundin
First Hawaiian Inc., Ralph Mench
General Electric Lighting, Joseph Howley
General Motors Hughes Electronics-
Corp, Renzo Ventura
Georgia Institute of Technology,
BillHalabi
Holophane Company Inc., John Forbes
Johnson 8c Johnson, Harry Kauffman
KNP BT USA Inc., Randall L. Teesdale
Larry's Markets, Incorporated,
Larry McKinney
Louisville & Jefferson Metro Sewer
District, James J. Hunt
Marvel Lighting Corporation,
Paul Greenberg
McNeil Real Estate Management,
Zack Maggart
Medical College of Ohio,
Harvey Vershum
Memorial Hospital at Gulfport,
BillDeitenbeck
Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit
Authority, OlenA. Pressley
Milwaukee Insurance, Glen A. Perry
Minneapolis Public Schools 8c Special
District #1, Allen L.Johnson
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company,
Inc., Theodore Kraschinsky
Omaha Public Power District,
Marc Nichols
Outrigger Hotels Hawaii, Steve Timpson
Oxford Properties Florida,
Robert C. Loida
Pima Community College,
Lorenzo Cotton
Providence Yakima Medical Center,
David W.Jones
Rockwell International Corporation,
Kieran Bergin
Shell Oil Company, Ron Dudley
Sica Electrical & Maintenance,
Ralph Sica
Sisters of Christian Charity Holy Family,
Konrad Winger
South Hills Health System, Robert Giffen
St. Joseph Hospital (NC), Mark Garland
The City of Portland, Oregon,
David Tooze
The State of South Dakota, Dale Knapp
Toshiba America Cons Prod,
Douglas Bagrovjski
Trimblehouse Corporation,
James Smulian
University of Miami, James Durante
Villa Lighting Supply, Inc., Amy Villa
Waldenbooks, Rob Packnick
Welborn Baptist Hospital,
William Gillam
Wellington Sears Company,
T. Halliburton Wood
Correction
Straub Clinic and Hospital (Hawaii) was inadvertently
omitted from the 10096 Healthclub list on page 5 of
the July Update
Articles of
Interest
"New Fixtures Offer Integrated
Control Technology" Energy
User News, May 1995,
pp. 40-42.
"Recognizing Productivity,
New Age of Lighting Retrofit"
Building Operations
Management, May 1995,
pp. 44-48.
"SortingThrough EMS
Options," Building Operations
Management, May 1995,
pp. 60-66.
"Whole-Bldg. Approach Can Be
Applied to Retrofits" Energy
User News, June 1995,
pp. 23-26.
September 1995 15
-------
Workshops
2'/2-Day Workshops Featuring:
Lighting Upgrade Technologies
Lighting Analysis Software
Financing Analysis
Preregistration Form: Green Lights
workshops are free and open to the public.
Space is limited, however, and priority will be
given to Green Lights Partners. Complete
details and instructions will be faxed to pre-
registrants within 4 weeks of the workshop
date.
Please Indicate Preferred Workshop*:
Q Washington, DC Sept 6-8
Green Lights Reporting
Lighting Maintenance and Disposal
Surveyor Ally Exam (on third day)
Register by Phone: Call the Green
Lights/ENERGY STAR Hotline at 202 775-6650
Register by Fax: Fax this form to the
Lighting Services Group at 202 775-6680
Register by Mail: Mail to EPA Green Lights
(6202J), 401 M Street SW, Washington, DC
20460
CJ New York, NY Sept 20-22
NAME
TITLE
COMPANY/ORGANIZATION
ADDRESS
CITY
STATE
ZIP
PHONE
*Please call 202 775-6650 for current workshop information The Surveyor Ally exam will be given on the morning
of Day 3 and will conclude by I I 00 am
FAX (IMPORTANT IN PROCESSING THIS FORM)
STATUS: (PLEASE CHECK ONE)
LJ Partner LJ Prospective Partner
LJ Ally LJ Surveyor Ally Candidate
Q Other
vvEPA
United States
Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation (6202J)
Washington, DC 20460
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use
$300
BULK RATE
Postage and Fees Paid
EPA
G-35
Recycled/Recyclable
Printed with Soy/Canola Ink on paper that
contains at least 50% recycled fiber
------- |