EPA/540/2-89/010
     SUPERFUNDTREATABILITY
            CLEARINGHOUSE
               Document Reference:
 Ecology and Environment, Inc. "Summary Report on the Field Investigation of the
Sapp Battery Site. Jackson County, Florida." Approximately 170 pp. in two volumes.
  Technical report prepared for Florida Department of Environmental Regulation
                 (FDER). November 1986.
              EPA LIBRARY NUMBER:

           Superfund Ttestability Clearinghouse • EURY

-------
               SUPERFUND TREATABILITY CLEARINGHOUSE ABSTRACT
Treatment Process:

Media:

Document Reference:
Document Type:

Contact:
Site Name:
Location of Test:
Immobilization - Cement and Fly Ash Solidification

Soil/Clayey

Ecology and Environment, Inc.  "Summary Report on
the Field Investigation of the Sapp Battery Site."
Jackson County, Florida."  Approximately 170 pp. in
two volumes.  Technical report prepared for Florida
Department of Environmental Regulation (FDER).
November 1986.

Contractor/Vendor Treatability Study

Kristen Teepen
U.S. EPA - Region IV
345 Courtland Street, N.E.
Atlanta, GA  30365
404-347-4727

Sapp Battery Site, Jackson County, FL (NPL)

Jackson County, FL
BACKGROUND;  This treatability study presents the results of field
investigations at the Sapp Battery site in Florida, an abandoned battery
recycling operation.  The site is estimated to contain 14,300 cubic yards
of soils with lead levels in excess of 1,000 ppm.  The soils in the
immediate vicinity of the site are a mixture of brown sand and yellow-brown
sandy loam to a depth of five feet.  A detailed QA/QC plan and analytical
protocols is described in the second volume to the study.  A sampling
program and fixation study was conducted to evaluate cementitious and
pozzolanic cementation technologies for leachate minimization potential.
This abstract will focus on the fixation study and the ability of the
processes evaluated to immobilize heavy metals.
OPERATIONAL INFORMATION;   The cement base solidification process involves
sealing the contaminated soil in a portland cement matrix.  The pozzolanic
process involves sealing the contaminated soil in a matrix of lime and  fly
ash.  Soil samples from 0 to 5 and 5 to 10 foot depth intervals were
composited and used.  Analysis of the composite sample showed 7100 mg/kg of
lead.  Soil samples were mixed with varying percentages of solidification
agent and water and allowed to set.
PERFORMANCE;  Three pozzolanic, three cementitious solidification mixes and
one control were prepared for the EP Toxicity leaching test.  The results
of the chemical fixation analysis are shown in Table 1.  The results
indicate that the cementitious mixture was much more effective in binding
lead than the pozzolanic cement mixture (fly ash and lime).  The portland
cement mixture exhibited excellent binding capacity for all samples  (1126A
through C).  Compared to the maximum allowable concentration of 5 mgs/liter
(EP Toxicity), the analysis of the fixed samples were at or near the  lead
detection limit.  Lead concentrations in the leachate from the pozzolanic
3/89-29                                              Document Number:   EURY

   NOTE:  Quality assurance of data may not be appropriate  for  all uses.

-------
 mixture were much higher than in the portland cement mixture.  The authors
 offer no explanation for the difference but did indicate that the soils can
 be solidified to reduce lead concentrations in the leachate to acceptable
 levels.  It is anticipated that cement requirements could be reduced and
 heavy metal control increased through process optimization.

 CONTAMINANTS;

 Analytical data is provided in the treatability study report.  The
 breakdown of the contaminants by treatability group is:

 Treatability Group             CAS Number        Contaminants

 Wll-Volatile Metals            7439-92-1         Lead
 NOTE:   This is a partial listing of data.   Refer to the document for more
        information.
3/89-29                                              Document  Number:   EURY
   NOTE:  Quality assurance of data may not be appropriate  for all uses.

-------
                                                   TABLE 1

                                   RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF EXTRACTS
                                            FROM EP TOXICITY TESTS
                                           Samples
                                                                        Maximum
                                                                      Allowable EP
                                                                        Toxicity
                                                                     Concentrations
                                                                        (mg/1)
Pozzolanic

E & E Lab Number 86-*

Sample Identity



Lead (mg/1)
1126D

Ash: Lime: Soil

0.25:0.25:1

76.4
1126E

Ash: Lime: Soil

0.5:0.5:1

<0.06
1126F

Ash: Lime: Soil    Blank

0.75:0.75:1

7.17               <0.06
5.0
Cement itious
E & E Lab Number 86-*
Sample Identity

Lead (mg/1)

1126A
Concrete: Soil
0.5:1
0.085

1126B
Concrete: Soil
1:1
<0.06

1126C
Concrete: Soil
1.5:1
<0.06 5.0
*  86-1126 is a composite of 9 samples.  The untreated composite sample has a lead concentration of 71,000
   mg/kg.  The EP Toxicity Test on the control sample (untreated composite soil material) yielded 59.4 mg/1.
3/89-29
                                                            Document Number:  EURY

-------
                                     PA
                                            o
                                             FM-2901 Oil 70
             SUMMARY REPORT ON THE
            FIELD INVESTIGATION OF THE
                SAPP BATTERY SITE,
            JACKSON COUNTY, FLORIDA

               VOLUME 1 - REPORT
                  November 1986
                   Prepared for:

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION
                2600 Blairstone Road
              Tallahassee, Florida 32301
    ecology and environment,  inc.

    195 SUGG ROAD, P.O. BOX 0, BUFFALO, NEW YORK 14225, TEL 716-632-4481
    International Specialists in the Environment
    recycled paper

-------
                             TABLE OF CONTENTS
   Section                                                          Page

      1      INTRODUCTION 	   1-1
            1.1   SITE  DESCRIPTION,  HISTORY,  AND  PAST
                 INVESTIGATIONS  	   1-4
                 1.1.1   Site  Description  	   1-4
                 1.1.2   Site  History  	   1-7
                 1.1.3   Past  Investigations  	   1-8
            1.2   GEOLOGY 	   1-12
                 1.2.1   General  Geologic  Structure  	   1-15
                 1.2.2   Regional  Soil  Conditions 	   1-16
            1.3   SURFACE WATER HYDROLOGY	   1-19
            1.4   HYDROGEOLOGY  	   1-21
            1.5   REGIONAL SURFACE WATER,  SURFACE WATER
                 SEDIMENT, AND BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS 	   1-23
                 1.5.1   Surface  Water  and Sediment  	   1-23
                 1.5.2   Algae Samples  	   1-26
                 1.5.3   Macroinvertebrates 	   1-26
                 1.5.4   Fishes 	   1-33
                 1.5.5   Heavy Metals Task Force  Investigation  ....   1-33

     2     FIELDWORK  	   2-1
           2.1   PRIORITY POLLUTANT CONFIRMATION STUDY	   2-1
           2.2   SOIL SAMPLING/FIXATION STUDY  	   2-6
                2.2.1   Soil Sampling  	   2-6
                2.2.2   Fixation Study 	   2-14
           2.3  SEDIMENT SAMPLING	   2-19
recycled pap«f                                            «-»lof» and rnvininmrm

-------
Table of Contents (Cont.)

Section                                                          Page

         2.4  GROUNDWATER  INVESTIGATION  	   2-25
              2.4.1  Residential  Well  Sampling  	   2-25
              2.4.2  Monitoring Well  Installation  and
                     Development  	   2-25
              2.4.3  Monitoring Well  Sample  Collection  	   2-28
              2.4.4  Slug  and Specific Capacity Tests  	   2-31

   3     RESULTS OF ANALYSES  AND  DATA  INTERPRETATION  	   3-1
         3.1  PRIORITY POLLUTANT  CONFIRMATION STUDY  	   3-1
              3.1.1  Soils 	   3-1
              3.1.2  Sediments 	   3-2
              3.1.3  Surface  Water 	   3-3
              3.1.4  Groundwater	   3-4
              3.1.5  Conclusions  	   3-5
         3.2  SOILS 	   3-7
              3.2.1  Surface  Soils (0  to 0.5-Foot  Interval)  ...   3-7
              3.2.2  B Interval Soils  (0.5 to 2.5  Feet)  .......   3-12
              3.2.3  C Interval Soils  (2.5 to 5.0  Feet)  	   3-12
              3.2.4  D and E  Interval  Soils  (5.0 to  7.5
                     Feet  and 7.5 to  10.0 Feet) 	   3-17
              3.2.5  Northwest Landfill  Characterization 	   3-22
              3.2.6  Soils Investigation Summary 	   3-26
              3.2.7  Fixation Study	   3-27
         3.3  SEDIMENTS 	   3-30
              3.3.1  Northwest Swamp  	   3-30
              3.3.2  West  Swamp 	   3-30
              3.3.3  East  Swamp 	   3-33
              3.3.4  Southeast Swamp  	   3-34
              3.3.5  Steele City  Bay	   3-34
         3.4  GROUNDWATER  	   3-38
              3.4.1  Hydrologic Analysis 	   3-38
                     3.4.1.1   Aquifer Potentiometric
                              Surfaces 	   3-38
                     3.4.1.2   Aquifer Physical  Test  Results ...   3-41
                                  IV

-------
   Table of Contents  (Cont.)

   Section                                                         Page

                 3.4.2   Chemical  Analysis  	  3-44
                        3.4.2.1   Aquifer Field  Parameters  	  3-44
                        3.4.2.2   Aquifer Lead Concentrations  	  3-46
                        3.4.2.3   Aquifer Selected Metals
                                 Concentrations 	  3-52
                 3.4.3   Contaminant  Migration 	  3-55

            3.5   COMPUTER  SIMULATION OF CONTAMINANT  FRONT
                 MIGRATION	  3-58
                 3.5.1   Model  Description	  3-58
                        3.5.1.1   FEMWASTE  Model for  all
                                 Aquifers  at the Sapp  Battery
                                 Site 	  3-58
                        3.5.1.2   Random-Walk Model for the
                                 Floridan  Aquifer at the Sapp
                                 Battery Site 	  3-60
                        3.5.1.3   Model Parameters 	  3-60
                 3.5.2   Simulation Results	  3-63
                        3.5.2.1   FEMWASTE  Model Predictions
                                 for all Aquifers 	  3-63
                        3.5.2.2   Random-Walk Predictions for
                                 Floridan  Aquifer 	  3-70
                 3.5.3   Random-Walk  Model  Prediction of Various
                        Floridan  Aquifer Pumping and Treatment
                        Schemes  	  3-70

     4     QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL	  4-1
           4.1   FIELDWORK	  4-1
                 4.1.1   Documentation 	  4-1
                 4.1.2   Samples  	  4-2
           4.2   LABORATORY SAMPLE ANALYSIS 	  4-7
                 4.2.1   Analytical Methods 	  4-7
                        4.2.1.1   Organic Analyses 	  4-7
                        4.2.1.2   Metals Analyses 	  4-8
                 4.2.2   Reporting and Quality Assurance  	  4-12
                 4.2.3   Analytical Quality Assurance Results
                        and Discussion 	   4-14
recycled paper                                            „•..!..«» ami .-min.niii.-m

-------
Table of Contents (Cont.)


Section                                                          Page


                     4.2.3.1   Organic  Analyses  	   4-14

                     4.2.3.2   Inorganic  Analyses  	   4-16

                     4.2.3.3   Data Reporting	   4-18


   5     CONCLUSIONS 	   5-1


   6     BIBLIOGRAPHY	   6-1-


Appendix


   A     FSU SURFACE WATER AND SURFACE WATER  SEDIMENT DATA 	   A-l

   B     PRIORITY POLLUTANT CONFIRMATION SURVEY ANALYTICAL
         DATA 	   B-l

   C     SOIL AND SEDIMENT SAMPLE ANALYTICAL  DATA 	   C-l

   D     6ROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL DATA 	   D-l

   E     DRILLER'S LOGS OF NEWLY INSTALLED WELLS  	   E-l

   F     DATA CATALOG 	   F-l

   G     ANTIMONY SPIKE LOSSES 	   G-l
Plate

   1     Sapp Battery Site Aerial Photograph 	   Inside
                                                                 Back
                                                                 Cover

   2     Sapp Battery Site Detailed Base Map 	   Inside
                                                                 Back
                                                                 Cover

-------
                          LIST OF  ILLUSTRATIONS
   Figure                                                           Page

   1-1      Location of Sapp Battery Site  	  1-2

   1-2      Sapp Battery Site Description Map	  1-5

   1-3      Site Photograph Showing Plastic Liner 	  1-6

   1-4      Generalized Stratigraphic Column for Jackson County,
           Florida 	  1-13

   1-5      North-South Geologic Cross Section through Jackson
           County, Florida 	  1-14

   1-6      Fracture Lineations and Sinkhole Locations 	  1-17

   1-7      Chipola River Project Study Area and Sample Stations ..  1-24

   1-8      Chipola River Sampling Station Locations 	  1-35

   1-9      Finfish Collection Sites for Heavy Metals Analyses  ....  1-36

   1-10     Cadmium in Fish in Chipola River FGFC/USFWS
           Sampling Stations 	  1-37

  2-1      Priority Pollutant Confirmation Study Sample
           Locations 	  2-4

  2-2      Surface Composite Sample Locations 	  2-8

  2-3      Soil Boring Sample Locations 	  2-10

  2-4      On-Site and Adjacent Sediment Sample Locations 	  2-20

  2-5      Off-Site Sediment Sample Locations 	  2-21

  2-6      Locations of Residential Wells Sampled November 2-4,
           1985 	  2-26

  2-7     Locations of Sapp Battery Site Monitoring Wells 	  2-27

  2-8      Typical Monitoring Well Construction 	  2-30


                                    vii

recycled paper                                            tt-
-------
List of Illustrations (Cont.)


Figure                                                           Page

3-1     Occurrence of Battery Chips 	  3-8

3-2     Lead Concentrations (mg/kg) in the Surface Soil
        Composite Samples	  3-9

3-3     Lead Concentrations (mg/kg) m the A Interval
        (0 to 0.5 Feet)  of the On-site Soil Borings  ...,._...	  3-10
                                       -f               "~
3-4     Lead Versus Antimony in the A Interval (0 to 0.5^
        Foot Depth) in FSA Samples Along the West Bank of  the
        West Swamp	,	  3-13

3-5     Lead Concentrations (mg/kg) in the B Interval
        (0.5 - 2.5 Feet) Samples of the On-Site Scrfl *            " fS"
        Borings	  3-14
3-6     Lead Versus Antimony in the B Interval (0.5 tfr-
        Foot Depth) in FSA Samples Along the West Bank of the
        West Swamp ................................ ...»>.. ...   3-15
3-7     Lead Concentrations (mg/kg) in the C Interval            "'
        (2.5 - 5.0 Feet) Samples of the On-Site Soil   ~
        Borings ......................................... ......   3-16

3-8     Lead Versus Antimony in the C Interval (2.5 to. 5.0 -_
        Foot Depth) in FSA Samples Along the West Bank of the
        West Swamp ......... sz ........... %, . .^ ................. -* 3-18

3-9     Lead Concentrations (mg/kg) in the^fr Interval
        (5.0 - 7.5 Feet) Samples of the On-Site* Soil
        Bor i ngs ............................... -« ....... ...... ,^.3-20,
                                                       "•         "~~
3-10    Lead Concentrations (mg/kg) in the E^Iffilerval  r':.^  T ^'
        (7.5 - 10.0 Feet) Samples of the On-5|tf:Soil     ,  --, .^^-
        Bori ngs  .................. ;........ .-^Sl ........ -£. . V. . " 3^1

3-11    Lead Versus Antimony In the D Interval ^0 to 7.5 -^^.....-
        Foot Depth) in FSA Samples Along the W«S£~8ank of  the ~ " ^
        West Swamp ............................................   3P23
                                                                  -
3-12    Lead Versus Antimony in the E Interval {7.5 to 10,0
        Foot Depth) 1n FSA Samples Along the W6&- Sink of--..     :
        the West Swamp ........................... .."...   , ---- — 3-2.4
3-13    Depth of Battery Casing Fill  in Northwest' Landfill
        Area  .................................. ;.....% ....... ..*3-25
                                               -,____ __ _ .       _^i  •  - . - --

3-14    Lead  Concentrations  (mg/kg)  in On-Site A, fr^and C
        Interval Sediment  Samples  ............ ;:...:r;V. .........   3-31

3-15    Lead  Concentrations  (mg/kg)  in Off -Site A,  B,  and C     "' &
        Interval Sediment  Samples  .............................   3-35

                                 v i i i

-------
   List of Illustrations (Cont.)
   F i gu re                                                          Page
   3-16    Generalized Potentjometric  Map of the  Surficial
           Aquifer System,	  3-39
   3-17    Generalized Potentiometric  Map of the  intermediate
           Aqu i fer System 	  3-40
   3-18    Generalized Potentiometric  Map of the  Floridan Aquifer
           System 	  3-42
   3-19    Lead  Concentrations  (ppb)  in  Monitoring Wells Open to
           the Surficial  Aquifer  System  	  3-47
   3-20    Lead  Concentrations  (ppb)  in  Monitoring Wells Open to
           Intermediate Aquifer System 	  3-48
   3-21    Lead  Concentrations  (ppb)  in  Monitoring Wells Open to
           the Floridan Aquifer System 	  3-49
   3-22    Lead  Concentrations  (ppb)  in  Residential Wells  	  3-50
   3-23    Finite Element Grid  System  for the  Sapp Battery
           Site	  3-59
   3-24    Random-Walk Finite Difference Grid  System  for the
           Floridan Aquifer  at  Sapp Battery 	  3-61
   3-25    Computed Contaminant Plume, 1 Year  Prediction (1986)
           Surficial Aquifer (FEMWASTE)  	  3-64
   3-26    Computed Contaminant Plume, 1 Year  Prediction (1986)
           Intermediate Aquifer (FEMWASTE) 	  3-65
   3-27    Computed Contaminant Plume, 1 Year  Prediction (1986)
           Floridan Aquifer  (FEMWASTE) 	  3-66
   3-28    Computed Contaminant Plume, 5 Year  Prediction (1990)
           Surficial Aquifer (FEMWASTE)  	  3-67
   3-29    Computed Contaminant Plume, 5 Year  Prediction (1990)
           Intermediate Aquifer (FEMWASTE) 	  3-68
   3-30    Computed Contaminant Plume, 5 Year  Prediction (1990)
           Floridan Aquifer  (FEMWASTE) 	  3-69
   3-31     Computed Lead  Plume, 5  Year Prediction (1990)
           Floridan Aquifer  (Random-Walk) 	  3-71
   3-32     Computed Lead  Plume, 10 Year  Prediction (1995)
           Floridan Aquifer  (Random-Walk) 	  3-72
                                     i x
recycled paper                                            «•.•!„«» and rm.nmm.-ni

-------
                               LIST  OF TABLES
   Table                                                           Page

   1-1     Lead,  Aluminum,  and  Cadmium Concentrations  in Stump
          Creek,  Little  Dry  Creek, and Dry Creek Surface
          Waters  Downgradient  of  Sapp Battery Site  	  1-27

   1-2     Lead, Aluminum,  and  Cadmium Concentrations  in
          Stump  Creek, Little  Dry Creek, Dry Creek  Sedi-
          ments  Downgradient of the  Sapp Battery Site  	  1-28

   1-3     pH  values  for  Stump  Creek, Little Dry Creek, and
          Dry Creek  Surface  Water Downgradient of the  Sapp
          Battery Site 	  1-30

   1-4     Community  Indices  of Algae Taken with Diatometers
          at  Four Stations in  the Little Dry Creek  System
          (quarterly, 1985 to  1985)  	  1-31

   1-5     Net  Plankton (numbers/m3 x 0.0001) Taken  in  Little
          Dry  Creek  - Dry  Creek System 	  1-32

   2-1     Soil/Sediment  Samples Collected for the Priority
          Pollutant  Confirmation  Study 	  2-2

   2-2     Surface Water/Groundwater  Samples Collected  for the
          Priority Pollutant Confirmation Study 	  2-3

   2-3     Organization of Collected  Soil Samples	  2-7

   2-4     Soil Solidification  - Cementitious Matrix 	  2-16

   2-5     Soil Solidification  - Pozzolanic Matrix 	  2-18

   2-6     Organization of Collected  Sediment Samples  	  2-22

   2-7     Construction Data for Supplementary Monitoring Wells  ...  2-29

   3-1     Results of Chemical Analysis of Extracts  from EP
          Toxicity Tests 	  3-28

  3-2     Model Parameters Used in Computer Program 	  3-62
                                    XI



recycled paper                                            «•„!,•«» and rntininmrm

-------
List of Tables (Cont.)

Table                                                            Page
3-3    Various Random-Walk Model  Predictions  for  Pumping  and
       Treating the Floridan Aquifer at  the Sapp  Battery
       Site 	   3-74
4-1    Soil QA/QC Samples Analysis Requirements  	   4-3
4-2    Sediment QA/QC Samples Analysis Requirements  	   4-3
4-3    Monitoring Well QA/QC Samples Analysis Requirements  	   4-4
4-4    Residential Well  QA/QC Samples Analysis Requirements  ...   4-4
4-5    Surface Water QA/QC Samples Analysis Requirements  	   4-4
4-6    Summary of Contract Required Detection Limits 	   4-9
                                  xn

-------
                             1.  INTRODUCTION
       This report presents the results of the field  investigation  con-
  ducted by Ecology and Environment, Inc., (E & E) at the Sapp  Battery
  site in Jackson County, Florida.  The investigation was performed
  under contract to the Florida Department of Environmental Regulation
  (FDER).  Tht Sipp Battery s-1te^s on the uU.
                                 1 ty -LI st- «s*r
  (lead)  and spent ac*d eontaftlnat ion o*-?M«t Iwa It tUaqytfeFI&siem  under -
                                      1s th«-3N»eefe reitrtt
  disposal
       The stffc
            fv*b*

                                   site is on a topographic high  rela-
 tive  to  the cypress swamps of Steele City and Bush Hammock  Bays,
 southeast  and  northwest of the study area, respectively.  The
 topography of  the area reflects the fluvial and karstic  processes  that
 have  occurred  in  the past and continue to occur.
       The primary  objectives of the field investigation were to  supple-
 ment  the results  of previous site investigations performed  by FDER and
 EPA,  and to provide site characterization support for the feasibility
 study (FS).  Km>Mta4 Wlt&mto^tteilafZtytytb: fiifetminr
  •».         ^, . „_.,.. ,r.,   .»„T, .^_     ,              "* -  ».:^ «* -f'*ilP**'-fr*s*.±-s5iit&/f:-+i& *&*Mjr

 tht lite- ttciVlty.   Pr1«r to Uegthnlng^the mat'n sinp"tlncf'effort,  a ?
 priority pt»llutanf-Cflf#4
-------
Figure 1-1  LOCATION OF SAPP BATTERY SITE




                   1-2

-------
  to aid  in the selection of analytical  parameters for the main investi-
  gation.   In  addition,  background  soil,  sediment, groundwater, and  sur-
  face water samples were collected for  comparison purposes.   This study
  was  performed during  the week  of  September 17,  1985.
       After the priority pollutant confirmation  study was completed,
  soil, sediment,  and groundwater  samples  were collected  and  analyzed
  periodically.  Surface water and  biological  samples were not collected
  in order  to  avoid  duplication  of:  1)  an EPA-funded study by
  Dr.  Robert Livingston, of the  Florida  State University  Biology
  Department,  who  performed an integrated  evaluation of surface water
  conditions and biota  in local  drainage  basins for field verification
  of laboratory bioassays;  2)  the  FDER Remedial Investigation (RI) in
  which surface water samples  were  collected;  and 3) a joint FOER, HRS,
  and  Florida  Game and  Fresh Water  Fish  Commission Heavy  Metals Task
  Force project during  which surface water and biological samples were
  collected  and analyzed.
      Soil  sampling was conducted  from  October 28 to November 11, 1985.
  This phase of the  study consisted of collecting soil samples over
  several depth intervals (usually  down  to 10 feet) from  areas not char-
  acterized  by previous  investigations.
      Sediment sampling was performed from November 11 to November 27,
  1985.  This  phase  of  the  study consisted of collecting  sediment sam-
  ples over  several  depth intervals on-site and in the surrounding off-
  site cypress  swamps.
      The  first phase  of groundwater sampling, conducted on November  2
  and 3, 1985,  consisted of collecting water samples from residential
 wells surrounding  the  site.  From November 6 to December 12, 1985,
  additional shallow, Intermediate, and  deep monitoring wells were
  installed  to  supplement the  existing on-site monitoring network.  New
  and existing  monitoring  wells  were sampled from November 17 to Decem-
 ber 12,  1985.  Sample  collection  techniques, locations, and the chemi-
 cal parameters for analysis  of soil, sediment,  and groundwater samples
 are discussed  in detail  in Section 2.
      In  addition to the  sampling  program, a fixation study and slug/
 specific capacity  tests  were performed  from November 20 to December
 18, 1985.  The fixation  study  was conducted to  evaluate cementitious
 and pozzolanic cementation technologies  for leachate production poten-
 tial.  The results of  the fixation study will be presented in Section

                                   1-3
recycled papef                                             .-...lo^ and rmimnmrm

-------
2.  The slug/specific  capacity  tests were conducted to determine the
hydrologic characteristics of each of the three aquifer systems under-
lying the site.
     Fieldwork was completed by December 20, 1985.
     Most of the soil  and sediment samples taken from the deeper sam-
pling intervals were archived pending evaluation of the analytical
results from the shallower intervals.  Ninety-six soil samples (from
the 5- to 7.5-foot and 7.5- to  10-foot intervals) and 33 sediment
samples (18 from the 5- to 7.5-foot and 7.5- to 10-foot intervals for
the 10-foot borings, and 15 from the 2.5- to 5-foot interval for the
5-foot borings)  were archived.   Based on E & E's evaluation of the
shallower interval data, FDER agreed that 54 of the archived soil
samples should be analyzed.  These samples were sent to the laboratory
on January 8, 1986, for analysi's and the results are included  in this
report.
     As requested by FDER, the  25 residential wells sampled November 2
and 3, 1985, were resampled in  March 1986.  These samples were ana-
lyzed for the same parameters as the initial residential well
sampling.  The results are presented in this report.

1.1  SITE DESCRIPTION, HISTORY, AND PAST INVESTIGATIONS
1.1.1  Site Description
     The Sapp Battery site  is located  in the heart of the densely
vegetated rural Florida Panhandle (Figure 1-2; Plate 1, inside back
cover).  The site in its present condition  is dominated by  a  large
bluish-gray synthetic liner which extends over a newly excavated area
(Figure 1-3).  This area was  previously the site of an acid holding
pond.  A building foundation  on the site is all that remains of the
Sapp Battery plant.  The foundation  is situated on a  relatively high
elevation at the north end  of the liner.  Remnants of  a truck  weigh
scale and acid drainage trough  are  apparent on the west side  of the
foundation.  The former Sapp  residence was  located south of the plant,
at the entrance to the site.   Only  two  small  building  foundations
remain of the residence.  The synthetic  liner  and plant foundation  are
surrounded  by a non-continuous  layer  of  broken  battery casings.   In
the vicinity of the former Sapp residence,  the  battery chips  are  more
weathered and rounded than those found anywhere else,  except
                                  1-4

-------
n
n
a
r>
01
o
                    GENERAL LOCATION OF
                      OLD FISHING POND
    O bO
             20O
                      SCALE
                      4OO
                               60O
                                        BOO FEET
       010
              bO
                             ISO
                                    ZOOMErtHS
Figure 1- 2    SAPP BATTERY SITE DESCRIPTION MAP

-------
Figure 1-3   SITE PHOTOGRAPH SHOWING PLASTIC LINER

-------
  at the location of  the  old  plant.  Although the exact location of the
  old plant is  unknown,  its general vicinity is believed to be several
  hundred feet  east of  the  larger  and newer plant foundation on the east
  side of the west swamp.
       North of the new plant foundation  is a small landfill area which
  has been primarily  filled in with battery chips.  This area is
  referred to here as the Northwest Landfill.  According to historical
  aerial  photographs, this  area was once  a small fishing pond.
       A complex system of  swamps  surrounds the site except directly
  west of the new plant.  These swamp areas include:

       o  The West Swamp, which receives  direct drainage from the old
          acid  holding  pond and plant foundation, areas;

       o  The East Swamp, which receives  drainage from the West Swamp
          and northern  limits of the area;

       o  The Northwest Swamp, which receives drainage from the North-
          west  Landfill  area;

       o  The Southeast Swamp, which receives drainage from the East
          Swamp; and

       o  Steele City Bay,  which receives drainage  from the Southeast
          Swamp.

       Except for the Northwest Swamp  area,  all of  these  surface  water
  bodies show contamination,  as evidenced by the  deterioration of sur-
  rounding vegetation,  particularly cypress  trees,  many of  which  have
  been killed.

  1.1.2  Site History
       In 1970, Sapp  Battery  Service,  Inc.,  (Sapp Battery)  began  to
  recycle lead  from used  automobile batteries  at  the  Jackson  County
  location.   The Sapp Battery operation gradually expanded  and,  by 1978,
  the facility  was processing approximately  50,000  used  batteries a
  week.  The residual acid  from the smashed  battery casings was  allowed
                                   1-7
recycled paD6r                                            rculog* anil rmimnmrm

-------
to run southeast down a slope adjacent to the processing plant  and
into the West Swamp.  Drainage from the West Swamp evidently flows
south and east into Steele City Bay, which connects to Little Dry
Creek approximately 1 mile from the site.
     Broken battery casings were primarily disposed of in  a man-made
fishing pond north of the facility and along the west bank of the West
Swamp.  However, pieces of battery casings are scattered over most  of
the site west of the West Swamp and south of the filled fishing pond.
     In 1977, FDER became involved with the site in response to com-
plaints from the local population.  As a result of FDER's  involvement,
Sapp Battery attempted to contain their contamination on-site through
a series of berms and channels and the holding pond.  However, this
limited remediation action was a failure, and further legal action
resulted in the closing of the Sapp Battery operation in January 1980
(Watts 1984).  Later in 1980, EPA initiated emergency remedial  action
at the site in an attempt to control runoff and leaching of wastes
into groundwater.  A berm was installed along the site's downgradient
boundaries and lime was added to several affected locations.

1.1.3  Past Investigations
     The Sapp Battery site was added to the National Priority List  in
September 1982, and the Groundwater Section of FDER, with  support from
the U.S. Geological Survey, began an RI of the site (Watts 1984).   At
the same time, Dr. Robert J. Livingston of Florida State University
began the biological work in the affected drainage basin.
     The RI primarily consisted of:

     o  Delineating battery casing disposal areas;

     o  Collecting shallow soil samples in the area between the plant
        and the acid holding pond;

     o  Collecting surface water and sediment samples from sample
        stations located throughout the Steele City Bay drainage  basin
        to Little Dry Creek; and
                                   1-8

-------
      o  Characterizing the physical and chemical parameters  of the
         groundwater system in the site vicinity by sampling  on-site
         and residential wells.

      The RI concluded that the Sapp Battery site contained:

      o  A large amount of landfilled battery chips (estimated  volume,
         28,000 cubic yards);

      o  High lead levels in the upper soil  horizon that  decreased  with
         depth;

      o  High concentrations of lead, manganese,  and aluminum in
         on-site and near-site (downgradient)  surface water and sedi-
         ment samples;

      o  Lead contamination at moderate to high levels in the surficial
         and  intermediate aquifer systems; and

      o  Low  levels of  lead (which most likely seeped into the  Floridan
         aquifer system via the sinkhole network  in the area) in down-
         gradient residential  wells.   Previous sampling of residential
         wells  by EPA in March 1980 and by the Florida Department of
         Health  and Rehabilitative Services  (DHRS)  in August  1982 had
         not  found  any  violations of  drinking  water standards;  however,
         the  majority of these wells  were located upgradient  from the
         Sapp Battery site.

      In  August  1983, EPA completed a limited  feasibility study (FS) to
 determine the need for initial  remedial  measures for the Sapp  Battery
 site  (NUS Corporation  1983).   The objective of this FS was to  develop
 remedial alternatives  that  would minimize further  groundwater  and  sur-
 face  water contamination and  minimize impacts to public  health and
 safety.  The EPA FS  concluded that in-place capping of the site with  a
 synthetic liner was  the most  cost-effective remedial technique; how-
 ever, the EPA FS further stated  that in  order to completely  evaluate
                                    1-9

recycled pap«r                                            „•„!,•«» nml r.imr..m,i,-m

-------
the effectiveness of the cap, gaps  in  the  soils  data  would  have to be
filled.  Because of this data gap,  the EPA FS was  not  finalized.
     Based on the RI and an  assessment of  the need for initial  reme-
dial measures by Environmental Science and Engineering,  Inc.,  FDER
performed additional soil  sampling  in  the  area of  the  acid  holding
pond to support an Initial Remedial Measures (IRM)  program  (ESE,  Inc.,
and OHM Co. 1984; OHM Co.  1984a, b).   As a result  of  this  sampling
effort, it was concluded that a large  volume of  soil  (14,300  cubic
yards) contained lead levels in excess of 1,000  milligrams  per
kilogram (mg/kg) and that  surface lead contamination  levels of 500
mg/kg existed south and east of the plant  and around  the acid  holding
pond.  The recommended IRM was to install  a temporary  surface  seal
over soils with lead levels  greater than 500 mg/kg.
     In 1984, FDER also completed the  remedial response  objectives and
evaluation criteria for a  comprehensive FS at the  Sapp Battery site
(ESE, Inc., 1984).  In general, this report addressed  response objec-
tives that protect human health, reduce the potential  for  contaminant
migration, and comply with Florida  water standards.
     Based on the selected IRMs, FDER  completed  the following  remedial
measures during 1984 and 1985:

     o  Removal of about 9,000 cubic yards of contaminated  soil and
        sediment from the  acid holding pond area;

     o  Backfilling of the acid holding pond and excavated  areas with
        clean soil and capping of the  area with  a  synthetic membrane;

     o  Installation of a  rip-rap filter drain where the drainage from
        the liner empties  into the  West Swamp;

     o  Installation of a  chain  link fence and warning signs  to secure
        the site;

     o  Installation of a  berm  and  weir  system  to control   storm water
        runoff;
                                    1-10

-------
     o  On-site treatment of contaminated water from the acid holding
        pond;

     o  Removal of a large pile of battery casing debris and contami-
        nated soi 1.

     The Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services in Jackson
County conducted blood lead tests on 1,565 persons from Alford,
Cottondale, and the surrounding area in December 1984.   Several per-
sons were found to have abormally high blood lead levels.  Further
investigation related these findings to conditions in their homes or
work places.  No connection with Sapp Battery was established.
     In addition to the above investigations, a variety of other stud-
ies have been performed.  These include:  1) air and surface water
sampling performed during the IRMs; 2) nutrient testing of on-site
soils by ESE, Inc.; 3) surface water and sediment analyses by the
Heavy Metals Task Force (FDER, HRS, and Florida Game and Fresh Water
Fish Commission); and 4) groundwater and soil sampling, including the
testing of residential wells at several residences near the Sapp
Battery site, by ESE, Inc.
     Plate 1, an aerial photograph from November 6, 1985, and Plate 2,
a topographic map,  were generated as part of the current investiga-
tion.  They illustrate existing condition of the Sapp Battery site.
                                 1-11

    Pdp6f                                            rc<»i
-------
1.2  GEOLOGY
     The Sapp Battery site lies within  the  Marianna River Valley  Low-
lands, the largest physiographic unit  in  Jackson  County  (Moore 1955).
Moore (1955) states that this terraced  lowland  area was  formed through
a complicated sequence of -stream erosion, deposition,  and capture
which resulted in the dissection and  lowering of  the Miocene-age  sur-
face.  Although dissolution of the underlying limestone  is not con-
sidered primarily responsible for the development of the lowlands, the
rectangular stream patterns revealed by aerial  photomosaics of Jackson
County suggest that joints and fractures  in the limestone may have
exerted a strong influence on the drainage  network that  developed in
the overlying clastic sediments.
     Figure 1-4 is a generalized stratigraphic  column  for Jackson
County.  Figure 1-5 is a north-south geologic cross section through
Jackson County which essentially passes through the Sapp Battery  site.
The following discussion of the geologic  units  in the  vicinity of the
site is summarized from Moore (1955).
     The Crystal  River Formation,  including the uppermost Bumpnose
Limestone Member, is the only unit of the Eocene-age Ocala Group  which
has been recognized in Jackson County.  The absence of the older
Williston and Inglis Formations of the  Ocala Group is  attributed  to
the Jackson County area occupying a structurally  positive position
that was not submerged by the transgressing sea until  the late Eocene.
     The Crystal  River Formation is a white to  cream,  generally soft,
granular, fossil iferous, permeable limestone that is often entirely
composed of orbitoidal foraminiferal tests  and  bryozoa.  It has fre-
quently been hardened to a dense limestone  by recrystallization.  The
Crystal River Formation lies at or near land surface over most of the
northern half of Jackson County.  To the  south, which  includes the
Sapp Battery site, the unit shows greater variations in  local relief
and is covered by varying thicknesses of  younger  sediments (Figures
1-4 and 1-5).  The thickness of the Crystal River Formation, including
the Bumpnose Limestone, is about 220 feet in Jackson County.
     The Bumpnose Limestone Member of the Crystal River  Formation is  a
white, soft, easily crumbled, fossiliferous (foraminifera and bryozoa)
limestone that is generally somewhat glauconitic  (especially near the
                                   1-12

-------








ERA


U
-
0
IM
O
z
IU
U

PERIOD
E
Z
E
IU
3
a


E
E
IU
H

EPOCH
RECENT
PLEISTOCENE


PLIOCENE
MIOCENE
OLIGOCENE
EOCENE

UPPER

FORMATION
Rivtr
floodplam alluvium
Mannt and fluvial ttrract
deposit!


Citrontllt Formation
Tampa Formation
Suwanntt Limtnont
Mananna limtstont
Group

BumpnoM Umettont Mtmbtr
Crynal
Rivtr
Formation







SOURCE Modified from Moor*. 1955
            Figure 1-4  GENERALIZED STRATIGRAPHIC COLUMN
                       FOR JACKSON COUNTY, FLORIDA
                                  1-13
recycled paper
                                                  t*itilo|{\ Mint

-------
                                                                            BUMPNOSE
                                                                           LIMESTONE
                                                                            MEMBER
                 LOWER CRYSTAL RIVER
                 FORMATION
400
   SOURCE . Modified from Moor* 1965.
                                               SCALE
                             O  1
                                                               12 MILES
                                024
                                                           16 KILOMETER
                 Figure 1-5  NORTH SOUTH GEOLOGIC CROSS SECTION THROUGH JACKSON
                           COUNTY. FLORIDA

-------
 top).  This unit ranges from 0  to 15  feet  thick,  thinning to the
 southeast.
      The Oligocene-age Marianna Limestone  is  a  white to cream to light
 gray, slightly glauconitic,  fossiliferous  (foraminifera and bryozoa),
 massive,  impermeable limestone.   This unit  is fairly uniform in thick-
 ness, varying between 25 and 40 feet.
      The Oligocene-age Suwanee  Limestone in Jackson County consists of
 tan to buff limestones, dolomitic limestones, and dolomitic to cal-
 careous clays.  This unit was subjected to erosion before deposition
 of Miocene-age sediments began,  and ranges from 210 feet to 512 feet
 thick in the central part of the county near Marianna and Cottondale.
      The Miocene-age Tampa Formation  in Jackson County is strati -
 graphically equivalent to the Tampa Limestone,  but primarily consists
 of white,  gray,  and  green clays  and clayey marls.  The formation is
 more calcareous  in the southeastern part of Jackson County and more
 argillaceous to  the  west and northwest; however,  the entire formation
 is characterized by  the presence of fine,  scattered quartz grains.
 The unit  is thickest in the  southeastern and  southwestern parts of
 Jackson County (approximately 50 to 100 feet  and  100 to 170 feet,
 respectively), but thins to  the  north, pinching out just south of the
 Sapp Battery site (Figure 1-5).
      The  post-Miocene sediments  of Jackson County, which include a
 number of  stream terrace deposits, consist of cross-bedded clays,
 sandy clays, clayey  sands, sands,  and gravels that change laterally
 and vertically within short  distances.  Several reports (e.g., Cooke
 1945 and  Watts 1984) have identified  the sediments underlying the
 stream terrace deposits as the  Pliocene-age Citronelle Formation.
 However,  Moore (1955)  and Vernon and  Puri  (1964)  suggest that making
 this differentiation could be difficult because the stream terrace
 deposits  and the Citronelle  Formation are  similar in color and com-
 position.   The post-Miocene  deposits  in Jackson County can attain
 thicknesses greater  than 100 feet, especially  in  areas where these
 sediments have filled fractures  or cavities in  the underlying lime-
 stone.

 1.2.1   General Geologic Structure
      The  rock  units  in Jackson  County dip  southeast, south,  and  south-
 west as a result  of  a broad  flexure to the north  (along the  Florida,


                                   1-15
recycled paper                                            rr»l and rnvimnnirm

-------
Georgia, and Alabama borders).   This flexure is commonly  known as  the.
Chattahoochee Anticline.  Moore (1955)  suggests the presence  of an
Oligocene to Miocene-age flexure to the south,  which is believed to
have caused the jointing and fracturing of the  limestone  bedrock in
this area.   As a result of this broad structural influence, the joints
and fractures in these soft limestone units have been weathered sub-
stantially to a point of creating a karstic terrain.   This  karst
characteristic in the Jackson County area is very evident when
regional topographic maps are examined.   For instance, as displayed in
Figure 1-1, karstic features such as sinkholes  and hummocks are com-
mon.
     The karst characteristics  are also common  at a more  localized
scale such  as that of the Sapp  Battery  site.  These features  were
determined  at the site by FDER  in a fracture trace analysis based  on
aerial  photographs.  Several lineaments  and sinkholes were mapped  on
tie site from this study (Figure 1-6).   FDER concluded that at least
ii sinkholes exist in the site  vicinity.   Two of these sinkholes were
confirmed by E & E's deep drilling in the Northwest Landfill  area
(MW-9A) and near the former Sapp residence (MW-12A).

1.2.2  Regional Soil Conditions
     The U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil  Survey of Jackson County
identified  four soil associations in the  vicinity of the  Sapp Battery
site.  The  Dorovan-Pamlico association  was recorded in the  swampy
areas of the site and is characterized  as mainly black muck with a
lower horizon of dark grayish-brown sand.  The  Fuquay Coarse  Sand
association was recorded as occurring in  the area of the  site where
the battery cutting operation was located, and  is characterized as a
mixture of  brown coarse sand and yellow brown sandy loam  to a depth of
approximately 5 feet.  The Grady Fine Sandy Loam and the  Dothan Loamy
Sand associations were identified as possibly being present in small
areas to the west and north of  the site,  respectively. Neither of
these two latter soil associations differs significantly  from the
Fuquay Coarse Sand in its chemical or physical  properties.  However,
the extensive earth-moving activities that occurred at the  Sapp Bat-
tery site in the 1970s and more recently raises doubts as to  how
                                   1-16

-------
                                         LEGEND-
                                Fraciur* Lin«»llur\
SOUHCt  FDtH, 1984
                        [    | Sinl
                                                         ikhol*
                          !>O  2OO
0 1O    bO
f*i*-.'mm. rm<
                SCALE


               4QQ	    60O	    SOOr-EET


                               2OOMKTERS
                                        1OO
                                                16O
             Figure 1 -6   FRACTURE LINEATIONS AND SINKHOLE LOCATIONS

-------
accurately this survey represents current soil conditions at the site.
Site soil conditions based on actual  field boring results are provided
in Section 3.2 of this report.
                                   1-18

-------
  1.3  SURFACE WATER HYDROLOGY
       Surface runoff at the site flows to the several swamps located on
  and immediately adjacent  to the site.  The highest elevation on the
  western portion of the property is at the approximate mid-point of the
  west  property line,  where the truck weigh scale foundation is located.
  From  this  high point,  surface runoff is somewhat radial.  The area
  between the  plant  foundation and the most southern extent of the
  Northwest  Landfill drains to the Northwest Swamp.   Areas east and
  northeast  of the site  drain via many small  rills to the West Swamp.
  The area south of  the  plant foundation is presently covered by a
  plastic liner which  prevents infiltration of rainfall  and runoff.  It
  drains  and concentrates runoff to the southeast, where dikes direct
  the water through  the  limestone rip-rap drain and  into the southern
  end of  the West Swamp.
      All areas on-site and southwest of the plastic liner drain to the
  south or southeast and eventually to the road ditch along County Road
  280.  At several points where runoff spills through the fence and into
  the road ditch  south of the West Swamp, sediments  have been washed
  away, revealing battery chips at least 1 foot thick.
      The Northwest Landfill  area is nearly level,  with runoff being
  ponded  locally in  several  areas.
      Surface  drainage  from the northern areas east of the Northwest
  Landfill flows  toward the East Swamp.   There is an area east of the
  Northwest Landfill where  clay was scraped and used to construct berms,
 to fill  in the  acid pond,  and as  a base for the plastic liner south of
 the plant foundation.  Runoff in this northern area is confined to the
  large shallow  depression  created  by this operation.
      There is  an area  1n  the southeast quadrant of the site which is
 low in elevation and is bordered  on three sides by the dike east of
 the West Swamp, the East  Swamp,  and the Southeast  Swamp.  Under high
 water conditions,  this open  area  floods,  and water discharges through
 a cut in the dike  into the Southeast Swamp.   This  discharge was
 observed several times after  rainfall  events during the November/
 December fieldwork and again  in  January by a survey party.  Under
 normal  precipitation conditions  and periods  of slightly raised water
 table,  ponding  and marshy  conditions occur  over much of the area.
                                    1-19

recycled paper                                             «-,,l«g» ami nmn.nnirm

-------
     There has not been a surface water connection between the  West
Swamp.and Steele City Bay since 1980, when drainage from the  West
Swamp to the culvert under County Road 280 was filled and a berm con-
structed.  The Southeast Swamp remains connected to Steele City Bay  by
a culvert under County Road 280.
     Steele City Bay and several wetlands to the east make up a system
of interconnected surface water bodies which contribute a relatively
low amount of discharge to Little Dry Creek, about 1 mile south-
southeast of the Sapp Battery site.  Observations made in November
1985, during sediment sampling, indicated that direct surface drainage
from this wetland system to Little Dry Creek does not occur under
drier conditions.
     On November 11, 1985, 10 days after the last rains of Hurricane
Juan, the observed rate of discharge through the relatively narrow
channel into Little Dry Creek was approximately 1 to 3 cubic  feet per
second (cfs).
                                    1-20

-------
  1.4  HYDROGEOLOGY
       the groundwater system at the site consists of a complex sequence
  of anisotropic,  heterogeneous aquifers and aquitards.  This complexity
  reflects the karstic nature of the relatively deep subsurface lime-
  stones and the depositional history of the overlying unconsolidated
  sediments.
       In general, there are three aquifer systems in the vicinity of
  the Sapp Battery site:   the confined Floridan aquifer system; the
  overlying semi-confined intermediate aquifer system; and the shallow,
  unconfined surficial  aquifer system.  In addition,  possibly two or
  three more localized semi-confined hydrostratigraphic units occur
  within the intermediate deposits.
       The shallow surficial  aquifer system in this area of Jackson
  County lies  within Pliocene-age sands and clays and Holocene to
  Pleistocene-age  undifferentiated marine, fluvial, and terrace mate-
  rials.   In general,  this aquifer system is present  to a depth of 10
  to 30 feet below land surface, and is confined below by the upper
  impermeable  clayey layers  of the intermediate aquifer system.  The
  potentiometric surface  of  the surficial aquifer system in this area
  has  a hydraulic  gradient to the south-southeast and for the most part
  is a reflection  of topographic conditions.  This aquifer is in direct
  communication  with the  surrounding cypress swamps;  hence, water levels
  are  commonly very near  or  at land  surface in low-lying areas.  As a
  result  of  the  low permeability of  the sandy clays and clayey sands
  that  comprise  the surficial aquifer system, reported well yields are
  generally  less than  5 gallons  per  minute (gpm)  (Watts 1984).
       The semi-confined  intermediate aquifer system lies within the
  Pliocene and Miocene-age clays,  sandy clays, and clayey sand
  sequences, which  exhibit great variability with respect to texture and
  continuity.  This aquifer  system ranges in thickness from 30 to
  greater  than 100  feet.   The great  variability of the intermediate
  aquifer  reflects  the  undulating  surface of the underlying limestone as
  well  as  the  presence  of filled-in  sinkholes.  The intermediate aquifer
  system exhibits multiple potentiometric surfaces, which are most
  likely the result of  semi-confined perched units being locally present
  at different elevations throughout its thickness.  However, a more
                                   1-21
recycled paper                                             (.).(>lor and rattninmfnt

-------
uniform potentiometric surface, with a hydraulic gradient to the west-
southwest, is defined by wells screened generally 30-feet below land
surface.  Locally, paleo-stream channels have dissected the upper con-
fining units of the intermediate aquifer system, thereby creating a
direct connection between this system and the overlying surficial
aquifer system.  The more impermeable units present in the lower por-
tion of the intermediate aquifer system effectively confine the
Floridan aquifer system except where it 1s breached by sinkholes.
Rural and domestic supply wells open to the intermediate aquifer sys-
tem generally have been reported to have yields of less than 10 gpm
(Watts 1984).
     On a regional scale, the Floridan aquifer  system  lies within
Oligocene and Eocene-age limestones and dolomites.  However, in Jack-
son County the Eocene-age limestones of the Ocala Group make up the
primary storage unit for this artesian system.  In the vicinity of the
Sapp Battery site, the Floridan aquifer system  is believed to  be 400
to 600 feet thick, with well yields in excess of 1,000 gpm (Franks
1982).  The reported regional hydraulic gradient for  the Floridan
aquifer system in this area is generally-to the east  (U.S. Geological
Survey 1982).
     The hydrology and chemistry of each of the three aquifer  systems
are discussed in greater detail in Section 3.4.
                                   1-22

-------
   1.5   REGIONAL SURFACE WATER, SURFACE WATER SEDIMENT, AND BIOLOGICAL
        EFFECTS
        Dr. D. J. Livingston, Florida State University (FSU),  with  a
   grant from EPA., began research at Sapp Battery Plant in  May 1983.  The
   main  thrust of his research dealt with determining the validity  of
   bioassays as predictors of conditions in the field.   However,  he also
   drew  conclusions regarding conditions of surface water,  sediments, and
   biota at the site and downgradient from it.   All  of  Dr.  Livingston's
   studies dealt with community parameters.  No tissue  analyses were per-
   formed on any organisms.
       A series of 14 sampling stations was established,  beginning on
  the site and progressing down Little Dry Creek and Dry Creek to  the
  Chipola River Confluence (Figure 1-7).  Sampling began in May  1983 and
  was concluded in May 1985.   After June 1984, the majority of sample
  types were collected on a quarterly basis.   After September 1983, no
  samples were collected from Station 9 and 10.   The following discus-
  sion is a summary of the Livingston (1985)  sampling  results.

  1.5.1  Surface Water and Sediment
       Surface water and sediment  samples were taken quarterly and
  analyzed for heavy metals.   Surface waters were collected as grab
  samples and  sediment samples  were taken from the top 2 cm of a 10-cm
  core sample.   Parameters analyzed for were nickel, chromium, zinc,
  manganese,  iron,  copper, lead, aluminum,  and cadmium.  A preliminary
  scan  of sediment  and water  samples  by Proton Induced X-Ray  Emission
  (PIXE) and convention atomic  absorbtion emission  spectroscopy  showed
  these metals  at detectable  levels.   No other chemical  analyses were
  conducted on  these samples.   The primary metals of concern  in  the FSU
  study were lead and  aluminum.  Of the seven  remaining, cadmium,
  chromium, copper,  iron,  and nickel  were found in  concentrations  only
  slightly above background levels  observed at control  sites,  whereas
  zinc  and manganese  seemed to  be  evenly distributed throughout  the
  system.  The following discussion concerns lead,  aluminum,  and cad-
  mium.  Cadmium  is  included  because  it is  considered  a contaminant of
  concern for surface waters  in the risk assessment.
      The highest  lead  levels  in  surface waters  were  found at stations
  1 and  2 in August 1983 at concentrations  of  36  and 11.25 ppm,
                                  1-23
recycled paper                                            «•,,!«»> ami m>in.nmrni

-------
I
ro
         SOURCE  Motlili««l tiom LiviO'lilQ"
                             Figure 1-7  CHIPOLA RIVER PROJECT STUDY AREA AND SAMPLE LOCATIONS

-------
  respectively.  After that time,  lead concentrations  began  to  taper off
  at these stations except in April  5, 1985,  at  station  1, which showed
  nearly a seven-fold increase.
       Aluminum in surface waters  showed relatively  high  values at sta-
  tions 1, 2, and 2A during December 1985 (4.5 to  5.2  ppm);  January 1985
  (3.7 to 22.7 ppm); and April 1985  (2.1 to 6.6  ppm).   In general, the
  lowest levels of aluminum were found during summer months.  Generally,
  the stations exhibiting higher lead and aluminum values in the water
  also exhibited lower pH values,  relative to other  stations.
       Cadmium in the surface water  stations was essentially not
  detected during the two sampling episodes in 1984, except  for 0.02 and
  0.09 ppm in stations 2A and 8, respectively, in  the  July 1984
  sampling.   However, cadmium was  detected at very low concentrations at
  the majority of stations sampled in 1985, with station  2 exhibiting
  the highest value, 0.04 ppm.
       Lead concentrations in sediment samples collected  at  stations 1,
  2, and 2A were consistently one  to two orders  of magnitude higher than
  levels from any of the other stations during any of  the sampling
  events.   Lead levels from late 1983 to early 1985  ranged from 184 to
  1935 ppm (station 1),  20.5 to  999.5 ppm (station 2),  and 16.8 to 47.0
  ppm (station 2A).  The higher  concentrations typically  occurred from
  1983 to 1984.   Lower levels were detected more recently.
       Aluminum concentrations in  the sediment samples generally fol-
  lowed the lead trends, with the  highest concentrations  also at sta-
  tions 1,  2,  and  2A, with values  ranging from:  8,799 to 24,565 ppm;
  7,465 to 18,010  ppm; and 1,330 to  18,200 ppm,  respectively, during
  sampling  episodes in 1984 to 1985.   As with lead,  the  increased alumi-
  num values  were  detected early in  the study and  decreased  in  late
  1984.
       Cadmium in  sediment showed  the same general trend  as  lead and
  aluminum, with the highest concentration at stations 1, 2, and 2A,
  ranging  from:  0.04 to 1.74 ppm; 0.10 to 2.81_ppm; and  0.03 to 0.13
  ppm,  respectively,  throughout  the  sampling episodes.   As with the
  other two metals, higher values  were detected  early  in  the investiga-
  tion  (1983)  and  lower  values at  the end (1985).
                                    1-25
recycled paper                                            rollout anil rmminntrru

-------
     A general summary of the FSU study of lead,  aluminum,  cadmium,
and pH results for surface water and sediments  are  summarized  in
Tables 1-1, 1-2, and 1-3.

1.5.2  Algae Samples
     In the FSU investigation,  algal samples  were collected qualita-
tively by hand and with 5-liter containers.   These  collections  were
made to generate species lists  at each station.   Quantitative  samples
were obtained using diatometers and phytoplankton nets.   Samples were
taken quarterly at stations 1,  2A, 6,  and 7.
     Samples obtained using diatometers exhibited the  lowest number of
individuals at station 1 and the highest numbers  at station 2A. The
lowest number of species generally occurred at  station  1, while the
highest was at station 6.  No pattern  of species  diversity  or  species
richness was observed.
     Concerning samples taken with the phytoplankton nets,  no  patterns
of species diversity or evenness were  noted.  The lowest  numbers of
individuals were noted at station 1.  Species richness  was  highest  at
stations 6 and 7 (Tables 1-4 and 1-5).

1.5.3  Macroinvertebrates
     Infaunal and epibenthic macroinvertebrates were collected quali-
tatively in sediment core samples and  in leaf packs (artificial sub-
strates set out in the stream)  during  the FSU investigation.   Qualita-
tive samples using nets were also taken to aid  in creating  a species
list.
     A gradient response to the distribution  of heavy metals and  low
pH in the Little Dry Creek and  Dry Creek system was exhibited  by
infaunal macroinvertebrates (animals found living in the  sediments).
Seasonal variations were noted; however, an overall pattern of lower
species richness, diversity, and evenness associated with higher metal
concentrations and lower pH values are exhibited.  It  should be noted
that numbers of individuals varied greatly among  the stations.
Numerical abundance at some of  the most contaminated stations  was
attributed to proliferation of  a very few resistant species.
                                1-26

-------
                                             Table 1-1

                           LEAD,  ALUMINUM,  AND CADMIUM  CONCENTRATIONS  IN
                           STUMP  CREEK,  LITTLE DRY CREEK,  AND DRY  CREEK
                       SURFACE WATERS DOWNGRADIENT OF THE  SAPP BATTERY SITE
LEAD (PPM)
Station
Date 6 5 11
July 31, 1984 <.01 -- <.01
October 31, 1984 <.01 —
January 29, 1985 .10
April 5, 1985 .10 —
4 1
<.01 4.55
.64
.41
.10 2.86
2 2A 3
80 .23 —
25 .01 --
58 .12 —
29 .10 --
4A 48 7 8
<.01 <.01 <.01 <.01
<.01 <.01 <.01 <.01
.10 .10 .10 .10
.10 .10 .10 .10
ALUMINUM (PPM)
Station
Date 6 5 11
July 31, 1984 <.05 -- 1.30
October 31, 1984 .03 --
January 29, 1985 .50
April 5, 1985 .50 --
4 1
3.36 1.12 1.
.43 12.
.68 22.
.80 3.67 6.
2 2A 3
51 1.70 --
52 1.18 —
70 3.70 —
60 2.10 —
4A 48 7 8
1.90 2.70 .54 .58
1.10 .60 .42 .41
.51 .61 .50 .50
.65 .53 .50 .50
CADMIUM (PPM)
Station
Date 6 5 11
July 31, 1984 <.02 — <.02
October 31, 1984 <.02 —
January 29, 1985 .01
April 5, 1985 .01
4 1
<.02 .02 <.
— <.02 <.
.01
.01 .01
2 2A 3
02 .02 —
02 <.02 —
01 .01 --
04 .01 —
4A 48 7 8
<.02 <.02 <.02 .09
<.02 <.02 <.02 <.02
.01 .01 .01 .01
.01 .01 .01 .01
Notes;

-- Indicates not sampled
   Station 11 was usually dry
   Sampling at Nations 3 and 5 was discontinued  in  October 1983
   Stations 2A, 4A and 48 Mere added  in May  1984

Source:  Livingston 1985
                                                1-27
   recycled paper
                                                                            anil rimmnmrm

-------
                   Table 1-2

 LEAD,  ALUMINUM, AND CADMIUM CONCENTRATIONS IN
  STUMP CREEK, LITTLE DRY CREEK, AND DRV CREEK
SEDIMENTS DOWNGRADIENT OF THE SAPP BATTERY SITE
LEAD (PPM)
Station
Date 6 5
August 1983 — 2.6
September 27, 1983 <.05 12.0
July 31, 1984 1.48 --
November 5, 1984 .97
January 29, 1985 1.23 —
April 5, 1985 2.22 —
11 4 1
3.10 1935.0
.56 184.0
1.92 323.5
2.11 208.0
454.0
5.04 252.25
2
999.5
51.6
163.3
218.67
73.19
20.5
2A 3 4A 4B 7 8
— 17.5
1.20 1.61
28.5 -- 2.10 3.84 2.69 15.05
16.8 -- .97 3.23 2.63 22.9
47.0 — 1.32 1.83 3.30 2.72
36.3 -- 8.60 2.87 3.11 10.79
9 10
— — — —
2.18 0.79
—
—
—
—
ALUMINUM (PPM)
Station
Date 6 5
August 1983 — .0
September 27, 1983 .0 .0
July 31, 1984 2950.0
November 5, 1984 1830.0
January 29, 1985 1772.0
April 5, 1985 1552.67
11 4 1
.00
.00 .00
4090.00 1900.0 21950.0
1640.0 9575.0
24565.0
3740.0 8799.25
2
.00
.00
15166.67
8533.33
18010.0
7465.0
2A 3 4A 4B 7 8
.00
.00 .00
18200.0 — 3430.0 3100.0 5200.0 2480.00
1330.0 — 1200.0 2400.0 2590.0 1230.0
12680.0 1517.0 2864.0 8530.0 3746.0
8204.0 — 5714.0 1829.0 2087.0 1012.0
9 10
__ __
.00 .00
__
—
—
--

-------
s
s
s
             Table 1-2 (Cont.)
  i
  ro
CADMIUM (PPM)
Station
Date
August 1983
September 27, 1983 <2
July 31, 1984 <
November 5, 1984 <
January 29, 1985
April 5, 1985
Notes:
— Indicates not saapled
Station 11 was usual 1
Sampling at Stations
6 5 '1 * 1 2 2A 3 4A 4B 7 8 9 10
<-90 — <.90 1.74 2.81 — .84 — — — — -_
.5 2.31 <.25 <.25 1.02 1.44 - - - - .61 2.05 <.25 1.07
.02 -- <.02 <.02 .06 .38 <.02 — <.02 <.02 <.02 <.02 —
•02 — — <-02 .04 .47 .03 — <.02 <.02 <.02 <.02 —
•OJ — — — .19 .31 .13 - .02 .05 .05 .04 -
•04 — — .07 .73 .10 .12 -- .12 .05 .05 .04 —


y dry
3 and 5 MBS discontinued in October 1983
                Stations 2A, 4A and 4B Mere added  in Hay  1984


             Source:   Livingston 1985

-------
                                        Table 1-3

                PH VALUES FOR STUMP CREEK, LITTLE DRY CREEK, AND DRY CREEK
                   SURFACE WATER DOWNGRADIENT OF THE SAPP BATTERY SITE
                                                   Station
       Date           6      5    11     4     1     22A      3     4A    48      7     8



Auguat 1983          5.50   5.7   5.5   5.9   3.4   2.9	     5.5   5


September 27, 1983   5.1    6.1   6.5   5.3   3.8   3.4	     5     4.7


July 10, 1984        4      —    3.5   3.4   2.6   2.8   2.8   —    3.8    3.7   3.7   4


October 19, 1984     5.3    —     --   5.7   3.3   3.4   3.4   —    5.5    5.4   5.1   5.2


February 4, 1985     4.2    —    3.9   4.5   3.2   3.2   3.2   —    6.4    5.8   5.2   5.5


April 1, 1985        5.2    —    4.7   4.7   3.5   3.4   3.4   --    5.4    5.4   5.4   4.9




Source:  Livingston 1985
                                          1-30

-------
                                          Table  1-4

                     COMMUNITY  INDICES  OF  ALGAE  TAKEN  WITH OIATOMETERS  AT
                    FOUR  STATIONS  IN THE LITTLE  DRY  CREEK-DRY  CREEK  SYSTEM
                                    (quarterly,  1984-1985)
Station
Date
Number of
07/26/84
10/29/84
01/29/85
04/05/85
Number of
07/26/84
10/29/84
01/29/85
04/05/85
01
06
07
2A
individuals per mm2 per slide
688.00
403.00
702.00
1,621.00
speciee
14.00
9.00
29.00
7.00
736.00
518.00
317.00
1,891.00

24.00
21.00
28.00
23.00
1,430.00
337.00
489.00
2,222.00

15.00
10.00
19.00
10.00
2,869.00
2,179.00
1,674.00
4,726.00

25.00
8.00
18.00
13.00
              Source*   Livingston 1985
                                             1-31
recvc!ed paper

-------
                           Table 1-5

                          NET PLANKTON
                    (numbers/in5 x 0.0001)
                    TAKEN IN THE LITTLE DRY
                     CREEK-DRY CREEK SYSTEM
Station
Date
Number of
07/26/84
10/29/84
01/29/85
04/05/85
Number of
07/26/84
10/29/84
01/29/85
04/05/85
01
Individuals
2,554.35
3,217.58
17,941.60
31,391.49
Species
19.00
11.00
13.00
17.00
06
per w3
7,830.48
12,003.70
48,024.38
29,077.64

11.00
36.00
38.00
22.00
07

4,315.38
8,317.11
48,984.53
35,176.28

15.00
25.00
32.00
21.00
2A

8,661.25
16,341.11
15,069.93
61,971.38

9.00
15.00
13.00
14.00
Source:  Livingston 1985
                               1-32

-------
     Epibenthic macroinvertebrates (organisms  living on the sediment
surface or slightly above it) exhibited a similar  pattern.  Seasonal
variations were noted.

1.5.4  Fishes
     Fish were collected qualitatively by using  an electrofisher.   No
fish were observed in the most highly contaminated areas  (stations  1
and 2).  Recovery of species richness and numbers  of individuals was
noted between station 48 and station 7.  Thi.s  pattern  follows  the
gradient exhibited by other types of organisms as  well  as the  gradient
of contamination (heavy metals and pH).
     Livingston concluded that altered species dominance  and  a
decrease in numbers of individuals and species of  periphyton  (algae
collected in diatometers) as well as net algae,  was due to water
quality changes in the immediate vicinity of the Sapp  Battery  site.
Also attributed to altered water quality were diminished  species  rich-
ness, diversity, and evenness of infaunal macroinvertebrates  and  the
complete loss of fish fauna.  A distinct biological response  was
observed along the gradient of contamination.   This was made  obvious
by change in the development of the algal community,  the  establishment
of resident invertebrates populations, and the loss of fish fauna.

1.5.5  Heavy Metals Task Force Investigation
     The Heavy Metals Task Force conducted several studies in the
vicinity of the Sapp Battery Site.  These included studies on the
Chipola River, including areas potentially affected by the United
Metals plant.  These investigations were conducted to  determine the
contribution of heavy metal contamination in water, sediment,  and bio-
logical samples from the Sapp Battery site and/or the United Metals
plant.
     In August 1982, FDER conducted a study on water and sediment
quality on the Chipola River in the vicinity of the United Metals
plant.  There was also a sample station  (station 14)  on Dry Creek,
which is the predominant drainage from the direction of Sapp Battery.
Water analyzed from station 14 revealed  no values for lead or cadmium
above detection limits.  Manganese was detected at 50 ug/1.  This
value is much lower than the 630 ppb  level analyzed for  at station 12,


                             .    1-33
                                                   rri»l«*K* unit rimnmiiH'Mi

-------
which is farther upstream on the Chipola River.   Sediment samples from
station 14 exhibited 4.2 mg/kg lead  and  0.6 mg/kg cadmium (see Figure
1-8).  In comparison, a slightly higher  lead  value of 6.5 mg/kg was
detected at station 13, situated on  the  Chipola  River above the Dry
Creek-Chipola River confluence.   Aluminum was not an analytical param-
eter in this study (FDER February 1983).
     A subsequent study was initiated in March 1983 as a result of
findings reported in September 1982  by the Florida Game and Fresh-
water Commission of high cadmium levels  and other metals in whole fin-
fish (largemouth bass,  spotted sucker) samples collected in the
Apalachicola Basin.  Freshwater clam (corbicula  sp.) samples were also
collected and analyzed  for metals.   Lead was  an  order of magnitude
higher in the spotted sucker (0.450  mg/kg), as compared to the large-
mouth bass (0.130 mg/kg) at station  4.  Lead  values at the remaining
stations for both fish  exhibited comparable levels both up- and down-
stream from station 4,  with peaks occurring farther downstream in both
samples.  These downstream values were again  higher for the spotted
sucker (1.54 mg/kg at station 7) versus  the largemouth bass (1.19
mg/kg at station 8).  This is due to the fact that suckers feed on
benthic organisms and often strain bottom mud in the process.  These
muds are sinks for heavy metals in aqueous systems.  Thus, ingestion
of these nutriment fractions would lead  to higher tissue metals levels
in the sucker versus the bass, which are primarily nektonic carni-
vores, feeding mainly on small fish.  Cadmium values for both fish
were below detection limits for the  majority  of  stations.  The greater
majority of bass samples were below  the  detection limit of 0.400 ppm.
Three stations, 9 (0.406 ppm), 7 (.475 ppm),  and 3 (0.440 ppm),
exhibited elevated levels.  All  except one of the sucker samples  (from
station 7, 0.426 ppm) were below 0.400 ppm  (see  Figure 1-9).  The
corbicula clam samples  provided a more comprehensive picture of
cadmium distribution along the Chipola River. These organisms strain
benthic mud for food and ingest mud  in the process.  As a result, bio-
concentration of heavy  metals is more easily  facilitated  in tissue.
The highest value was again evident  at station 7 (0.548 ppm), while
the second and third highest values  occurred  at  stations 2  (0.519 ppm)
and 1 (0.488 ppm).  From this wide range it can  be concluded that
cadmium is generally distributed throughout the  main stem of the
                                  1-34

-------
                  SCALE
                                  3MILES
                               ••KILOMETERS
Figure 1-8  CHIPOLA RIVER SAMPLING STATION
          LOCATIONS
                   1-35

-------
   I  ALABAMA
      H/O  0  S > 0 N
      /Kambo   /
    u»-m± ^•••••^••••MMMiAaaH
    .jSSiH*Mift=iu*

               10
                        SCALE

                      20      30
                                    4O
                                           50MILES
              10
                   20
                       30
                            40
                                50
                                    00
                                         70KILOMETERS
Figure 1-9  CLAMS AND FISH IN CHIPOLA RIVER FGFC/USFWS
          SAMPLING STATIONS
                         1-36

-------
      4J J1A  CIKvS  O  N
      >x '     i     I  J>k  D«llwaad
rvs. • i «• j *-i  v« i i »x »*  \^  | (i

7^r> L-.    i      L**^\  D«llwooa°(~7

^tt  STATE ^
-------
Chippla River and probably exists  in  small  indiscrete point sources
(FDER, March 1983).   Since no trend of metal  concentration existed as
a function of station location,  a  connection  with  Sapp Battery could
not be established.
     During the period 1983 through 1985,  a variety of fishes were
taken from five stations on the  Chipola  and Apalachicola rivers  (see
Figure 1-10).  Fillets were analyzed  for lead, mercury, and cadmium.
Statistical values indicated an  increase of lead and cadmium in
suckers versus bass,  and a general  increase in year-class metal  levels
for the aforementioned rivers.   On  a  further  1985  Chipola River  study,
a mean comparison for lead exhibited  similar  trends.  Additionally, a
slight gradient existed for lead up-  and downgradient from the Dry
Creek-Chipola River  confluence.  Lower concentrations existed upriver
from the confluence  at station 1, while  higher levels existed at the
confluence, near stations 2 and  2a.   Mean and standard deviation
values at station 2a  (up Dry Creek) indicated lower levels of lead
than at station 2 (Department of Interior 1985).   Thus, contamination
from the Sapp Battery site may be  a contributing factor to increased
levels of lead and cadmium in Chipola River fish.  However, evidence
is not sufficient to  indicate the  Sapp site as the primary source of
contamination.
                                 1-38

-------
                            2.  FIELDWORK
 2.1   PRIORITY POLLUTANT CONFIRMATION STUDY
      Prior to beginning the major portion of the fieldwork, a limited
 number of samples was collected and analyzed for priority pollutants
 (i.e., purgeable organics, acid base/neutral extractable organics,
 pesticides, total metals, cyanide, and sulfates).  The purpose of this
 limited  sampling was to confirm the analytical parameters for the main
 investigation.  Soil and sediment sample locations are listed in Table
 2-1;  surface water and groundwater sample locations are listed in
 Table 2-2.  All sampling locations are shown on Figure 2-1.
      For background purposes, soil, sediment, groundwater,  and surface
 water samples were collected from areas which were likely to be
 unaffected by contamination from the Sapp Battery site, off-site and
 to the west.   The background soil sample was collected in the south-
 central portion of an open pasture adjoining the site to the west
 (Jackie Farren's property); the background sediment and surface water
 samples were taken from the west Steele City Bay area; and the back-
 ground groundwater sample was collected from an assumed upgradient
 residential well owned by Mr. Emmett Roark.  These background samples
 were collected prior to the on-site fieldwork.
      In order to qualitatively represent site contamination, four
 soil samples, four sediment samples, four groundwater samples, and
 three surface water samples were collected on-site.  The soil samples
were collected in the Northwest Landfill area and the west bank of  the
West Swamp.  The sediment samples were taken from the Northwest Swamp,
West Swamp, East Swamp, and Southeast Swamp.  The soil and sediment
                                   2-1

-------
                              Table 2-1

               SOIL/SEDIMENT SAMPLES COLLECTED FOR THE
                PRIORITY POLLUTANT CONFIRMATION STUDY
     Sample/
 Location Number
             Location/Description
Soils

FSY01


FSG23P


FSG54P


FSA06P
FSA09P and
DSA09P (duplicate)

S8B01
FSR01


Sediments

FMH16


FMH17

FMH18

FMH19

FMH20
Pasture west of site, 5-foot boring composite
(background)

Northwest landfill, on-site grid station 23,
5-foot boring composite

Northwest landfill, on-site grid station 54,
5-foot boring composite

West bank of West Swamp, station 06, 5-foot
boring composite

West bank of West Swamp, station 09, 5-foot
boring composite

Soil/sediment sample jar (8-ounce) trip bottle
blank

Soil sampling equipment field rinsate sample
West Steele City Bay, southwest of site, 5-foot
boring composite (background)

West Swamp, 5-foot boring composite

East Swamp, 5-foot boring composite

Southeast Swamp, 5-foot boring composite

Northwest Swamp, 2.5-foot boring composite
                                  2-2

-------
                              Table 2-2
             SURFACE WATER/GROUNOWATER SAMPLES COLLECTED
            FOR THE PRIORITY POLLUTANT CONFIRMATION STUDY
     Sample/
 Location Number
             Location/Description
Surface Water
FSW01

FSW02 and
DSW02 (duplicate)
FSW03
FSW04
Meat Steele City Bay, southwest of site (back-
ground)
West Swamp
Southeast Swamp
Steele City Bay, west of culvert under railroad
tracks
Groundwater
FEW03A
FEW038B
FEW03C
FEW09C
FRW01

GWB01

GNR01
Monitoring well MW-03A
Monitoring well MW-03BB
Monitoring well MW-03C
Monitoring well MW-09C
Residential well (Emmett Roark residence),
southwest of site
Water sample trip bottle blanks  (1/2 gallon,
1 liter, 40 ml)
Monitoring well sampling equipment field
rinsate sample
                                   2-3
                                                           >M>i.V it,III fit

-------
ro
i
               ZIJ^
               5
                               FORMER SAPP
                               RESIDENCE
                BACKGROUND1
               GROUNDWATEll
                TAKEN FROM I
               EMMETT ROARKI
                   WELL
/
              A
              FSY 01
              BACKGROUND I
              SOIL
                          l._
                    FMH 16, BACKGROUND SEDIMENT 4NO"ly «<>•<< 280
                    FSW 01, BACKGROUND SURFACE WATER
                                               	^ -FSWe^-r	~^ If
                                               DOWNGHAblBMT/aURFACi-XXTER   \ ||
                                                                                                  O

                                                                                                  O
                                                                                       — LEGEND -

                                                                                        Soil Boring

                                                                                        Sediment. 0-5'
                                                                                        Composite

                                                                                        Ground water

                                                                                        Surface Water
                                             0  50
                                                     200
                                                               SCALE
                                                              400
                                                                      600
                                                                               800 FEET
                                                0 1O
                                                      SO
                                                             too
                                                                     150
                                                                            200 METERS
                            Figure 2-1   PRIORITY POLLUTANT CONFIRMATION STUDY SAMPLE LOCATIONS

-------
  samples were collected using  a  modified  hand  augering technique and
  composited over a 0-  to 5-foot  depth  interval.
       The groundwater  samples  were  collected from existing wells
  MW-03A, MW-03BB,  MW-03C,  and  MW-09C.   These samples were obtained
  using a polyvinyl  chloride  (PVC) bailer  after three well volumes of
  water had been  purged from  each well.
       Sampling techniques  are  discussed in detail in Sections 2.2, 2.3,
  and 2.4 for soil,  sediment, and groundwater, respectively.
       The three  surface water  samples were collected near the west bank
  of the West Swamp,  the west bank of the  East Swamp, and in Steele City
  Bay, west of the  culvert  under  the railroad tracks.  These samples
  were obtained by  submerging the sample container under the water until
  the container was  full.   Conductivity, pH, and temperature were mea-
  sured at  all  surface  water  and  groundwater sampling locations.
       Duplicate  samples (approximately  10% of the total number of sam-
  ples),  sampling equipment rinsates, and  trip bottle blank samples were
  collected for QA/QC purposes  (see Section 4).  All parameters for
  solids  and  water were  analyzed  at the detection limits specified in
  the QAPP,  except where matrix effects or high concentrations limited
  the volume  used for analysis, or required dilution or changing the
  detection limit to  "best  achievable."  As requested by FDER, complete
  data  packages were compiled for 12 of these samples in accordance with
  standard  EPA  procedures.  The analytical results of this initial con-
  firmation  study are discussed in Section 3.1.
                                    2-5
•r; .ciecj

-------
2.2  SOIL SAMPLING/FIXATION STUDY
2.2.1  Soil Sampling
     Soil samples were collected from a total  of  89 locations:   sur-
face composite samples at 18 locations; eight  5-foot  borings; 61  10-
foot borings; and two 15-foot borings (see Table  2-3).   The samples
were analyzed for either pH, lead,  and percent moisture,  or pH,  lead,
cadmium, antimony, and percent moisture.   Analytical  results for  the
soil samples are discussed in Section 3.2.
     All subsurface soil samples were collected using some  type  of
boring equipment, either a 4-inch solid stem auger, 4-inch  bucket
auger, or 2-inch split-spoon.   All  of the boring  equipment  was con-
structed from hardened steel,  with  the exception  of one  of  the bucket
augers, which was constructed from  stainless steel.   Most of the sam-
ples were obtained using disposable plastic spoons  and homogenized  in
plastic zip-lock storage bags before being placed into 8-ounce sample
jars.  Plastic spoons were used to  reduce the  potential  for outside
metals to contaminate the soil sample.   In several  instances, however,
a stainless steel spoon was used to collect a  sample  where  extremely
dense clays were encountered and plastic spoons were  not practical.
     As shown on Figure 2-2, a total  of 18 surface  soil  composite
sampling locations were established:   13 in the southeastern portion
of the site (three of which--FSS16, 17, and 18--were  located in  the
area of the former Sapp Battery facility), four in  the northern  por-
tion of the site, and one in the southwest corner of  the site.   Each
sample was collected as a composite of five aliquots  from a 25-foot-
diameter area.  Each aliquot was collected from a depth  of  0 to  0.5
foot, using a plastic spoon, and the total sample was homogenized in  a
plastic zip-lock storage bag before being placed  into the appropriate
sample container.  Spoons and bags  were discarded after  each sample.
     Fifteen of the 18 samples were analyzed for  pH,  lead,  and percent
moisture.  The remaining three samples, taken  from  the area of the
former facility, were analyzed for  pH, lead, cadmium, antimony,  and
percent moisture.
     There were certain procedures  common to  all  of the  soil borings
conducted on the site.  Observations made of  lithology (soil/sediment
                                   2-6

-------
                                            Table 2-3

                              ORGANIZATION OF COLLECTED SOIL SAMPLES
Prefix
Code
FSA-
FS8-
FSC-
FSE-
FSG-
Oeacription
10-foot borings conducted
along the Meat bank of the
West Swamp
10-foot boringa conducted
along the south side of the
southwest ben*
10-foot boringa conducted
through the concrete foundation
of the Sapp Battery plant
3-foot boringa conducted along
the eaat bank of the Nest
Swamp
10-foot boringa conducted in
Total
Locations
13
6
2
8
40
Total
Samples.
Analyzed'
72
20
7
27
130
Total
Samples
Archived
0
12
4
0
80
Archived
Samples
Analyzed
0
6
0
0
48
           a grid pattern north of the
           plant

 FSL-      15-foot boringa conducted in
           the Northwest Landfill

 FSS-      Surface soil composite sample
           locations
 3»


18
 3


19
Key;

1.  Totals given include duplicate samples collected (OS*-).

•One location did not involve sampling (exploration only).

Note;  Samples collected for Priority Pollutant Confirmation Study not included.
                                              2-7

-------
ro
I
00
                                  FORMER SAW
                             I  II   RESIDENCE
                             I
                                                                                                                        LEGEND
                                                   0 SO
                                                            200
                                                                        SCALE
                                                                     4OO         60O
800 FEET
                                                      0 1O
                                                              50
                                                                      100
                                                                              ISO
                                                                                       2OO METERS
                                          Figure 2-2  SURFACE COMPOSITE SAMPLE LOCATIONS (FSS)
                                                                                                                      Surface Composite
                                                                                                                      Sample Analytis
                                                                                                                      lor pH. Pb. Cd. Sb.
                                                                                                                      and % Moi.lur*

                                                                                                                      Surface Composite
                                                                                                                      Sample Analysis
                                                                                                                      for pH. Pb. and
                                                                                                                      % Moitiura

-------
 characteristics,  depth  of  battery  chip/casings fill, and depth to
 water'table,  when possible)  were recorded at each hole.  Upon comple-
 tion of each  boring,  the boreholes were grouted to the surface with
 Portland cement.   There were a few instances where cave-ins prevented
 grouting of the entire  hole.
      There were enough  4-inch-diameter solid stem auger flights to
 complete 10 boreholes before decontamination was necessary.  After
 completing 10 borings,  all  of the  auger stems were pressure-washed,
 scrubbed with trisodium phosphate  and water, rinsed with tap water,
 and then rinsed with  distilled water.  In contrast, both auger bits
 were needed for each  boring,  and these were decontaminated between
 boreholes.  The two solid  stem auger bits used for the borings were
 decontaminated after  each  boring by scrubbing in trisodium phosphate,
 using non-metallic brushes.   Toothbrushes were used to clean between
 auger teeth.   The bits  were rinsed with tap water and then with dis-
 tilled water.  Sampling personnel  washed their gloves between  sam-
 ples.
      The eight 5-foot borings, FSE01 through FSE08, are  located adja-
 cent and parallel to  the east bank of the West Swamp (Figure 2-3).
 Sampling was  conducted  over depth  intervals of 0 to 0.5  foot,  0.5  to
 2.5 feet, and 2.5 to  5  feet.
      It was originally  planned to  drill the 5-foot borings using  a
 drill rig and'solid stem augers; however, a high water table and
 flooding along the east bank of  the West Swamp resulting from  the
 heavy rains associated  with Hurricane Juan prohibited vehicular access
 to these sample locations.   Locations FSE04 through FSE07  were under
 water as much as  1 foot.
      At each  5-foot boring location, the 0 to 0.5-foot  sample  was  col-
 lected as a grab  sample and homogenized before being placed  into  the
 sample container.  Borings were  continued manually  to  5  feet.   Sam-
 pling at FSE01 and FSE02 was conducted using  a split-spoon core sam-
 pler which was driven to depth with  a sledge  hammer.   Although repre-
 sentative samples were  obtained, this method  was discontinued  after
 the first two holes because it proved to  be  too  time-consuming.   Fur-
 thermore, because the split-spoon  would  not yield  the  necessary amount
 of soil needed to obtain a duplicate  sample  from an interval,  an  addi-
 tional  coring adjacent  to  the first was  required.   The split-spoon
                                    2-9
•-cvcieO paper

-------
  o-r
SAMPLE
  rSL
  01 •
   2'-4'
 SAMPLE
   FSL
   02*
               FSG  ?SG
               14»  15*
FSG  FSG
23»  24 •
FSG
25 •
FSG  FSG  FSG
33*  34«  35-


FSG  FSG  FSG
43 •  44*  45«
	 LEGEND 	
DEPTH
0-6"
5'
10'
10.
10'
10-
IS'
SAMPLE
FSS
FSE
FSA
FSB
FSC
FSG
FSL
FSG
51 •
FSG
71*
     FSG
     62*
FSG  FSG  FSG  FSG
S3*  54•  55*  56 •

     FSG  FSG  FSG  FSG   FSG   FSG
     64*  66 •  66*  67*   88*   69 •
FSG
73*
      FSG  FSG  FSG  FSG  FSG
      75"  76 •  77 •  78*  79 •

, FSG  FSG  FSG  FSG  FSG  FSA
      85*  86*  87 •  88*  02*
                          FSA
                          01 •
                          FSG  FSG
                          96*  97 •
                           FSA
                           03 •

                                 .   .  ^. * -  fOS
                                   *
 FSS
 01*
           SO  100
                     200
                    SCALE
                  300    400
                                         500
                                                600 FEET
          0  10
                   40
                            80
                                    120
                                             160 METERS
      Figure 2-3   SOIL BORING SAMPLE LOCATIONS
                               2-10

-------
 was decontaminated before taking  each  sample.  The outside of each
 core "was scraped off before  the sample was collected and homogenized.
      Borings FSE03 through 08  were  dug using  a 4-inch stainless steel
 bucket auger.   Due to the potential for caving-in of the hole, as well
 as the problem of surface and  subsurface water entering the hole, a
 5-foot length  of PVC casing  was advanced downhole simultaneously with
 the augering.   This technique  was successful, especially in areas of
 fluid sands and muds, as  well  as  for borings  situated in areas under
 water at the time of the  fieldwork.  In addition, the installation of
 PVC casing enabled proper grouting  of  the open hole upon completion of
 the borings.
      When collecting samples from the  bucket  auger, the materials on
 both the tip and the upper portion  of  the auger were remqved.  Only
 the material from the inner  core  of the bucket was collected  so  as to
 minimize the amount of soil  in the  sample which had come into contact
 with the inner walls of the  auger as well as  any overlying  loose mate-
 rial.  The bucket auger was  rinsed  between sample intervals and, along
 with the PVC casing, was  thoroughly decontaminated between  boreholes.
 Plastic spoons and zip-lock  bags  were  discarded.
      Samples taken from FSE04  through  06  (directly west of  the former
 Sapp Battery facility) were  analyzed for  pH,  lead, cadmium, antimony,
 and percent moisture.  The other  5-foot borings were analyzed for pH,
 lead, and percent moisture only.
      The sixty-one 10-foot borings  were conducted on the western half
 of the property (Figure 2-3).  Each of these  borings was sampled con-
 tinuously over depth intervals of 0 to 0.5 foot, 0.5 to 2.5 feet, 2.5
 to 5 feet, 5 to 7.5 feet, and  7.5 to 10 feet.
      Forty of  the 10-foot borings were located  in  a  grid pattern
 extending north of the plant foundation and covering most of  the
 northwest quadrant of the site.   Most  locations were spaced at  75
 feet; however, the southwestern portion of the  grid  is based  on  150-
 foot centers as requested by FDER,  due to the absence  of buried  cas-
 ings in this area and the low  potential for heavy  contamination.   Bor-
 ing locations  in the grid are  referenced  as FSG14  through FSG97  (with
 the two-digit  number referencing  the position of the point  in columns
 1  through 9 and rows 1 through 9, respectively).
                                    2-11

recycled paper

-------
     Several  changes  in  grid  boring  locations were made due to field
conditions.   FSG14  was moved  14 feet southeast due to large trees
preventing further  access.  FSG15 was moved 8 feet east, away from the
dug-out pond  on the north property line.  FS651 was moved 10 feet to
the southeast because of muddy conditions which prevented rig access.
FSG69 was moved 10  feet  south of the berm on which it was originally
surveyed; and FSG91 was  offset 8 feet northeast to avoid a deep pud-
dle.
     All of the 10-foot  borings in the grid were drilled using a drill
rig.  A 4-inch diameter  solid stem auger flight was drilled to a
depth of 5 feet and hydraulically extracted to avoid mixing the soil
sample material.  The outside deposits on the auger were scraped off
to remove materials originating from the walls of the borehole during
extraction.   After  the 0 to 5-foot samples were collected, a clean
10-foot length of auger  was inserted and the borehole was drilled from
5 to 10 feet.  After  hydraulically extracting the 10 feet of auger,
the outside material  was scraped off the lower flight and the 5- to
10-foot samples were  collected.
     At all boring  locations  in the  grid, the lower two samples (5 to
7.5 feet and  7.5 to 10 feet)  were archived pending the review of the
analytical data from  the 0 to 5-foot samples.  Where warranted,
selected samples were removed from storage and analyzed.  The selec-
tion and analyses of  archived samples are discussed in Section 3.2.4.
     Samples  FSG34A,  FSG35A-C, FSG43A-C, and FSG44A-C were split with
EPA, and complete data packages were prepared for these samples in
accordance with standard EPA  procedures.  These data packages were
submitted under separate cover.
     Samples  collected at seven 10-foot boring locations  in the area
of the Northwest landfill were analyzed for pH, lead, cadmium, anti-
mony, and percent moisture.   All other  samples collected  in the grid
were analyzed for pH, lead, and percent moisture.
     Thirteen of the  10-foot  borings  (FSA01 through 13) were drilled
along the west bank of the West Swamp and to the south where the West
Swamp drains  toward County Road 280  (Figure 2-3).  Originally, FSA01
through 12 were plotted  directly adjacent and parallel to the bank  of
the swamp.  However,  field  personnel  decided to relocate  FSA04 through
07 further upland to  the west because  it was felt that these borings
                                2-12

-------
 would provide more useful information if located  more  centrally  in
 this battery chip-filled area between the boring  grid  of the previous
 IRM effort and the West Swamp.
      Each of the FSA borings was sampled continuously  over the same
 intervals as those in the grid;  however,  all  samples were analyzed for
 pH, lead, cadmium, antimony, and percent moisture,  including those
 taken over the 5 to 7.5-foot and 7.5  to  10-foot intervals.  No samples
 from this group were archived.
      Due to a high water table  and  flooding resulting  from the heavy
 rains of Hurricane Juan,  the drill  rig could  only gain access to seven
 of the 13 FSA boring locations:   FSA01,  05, 06, 07, 08, 12, and  13.
 The FSA  drill rig borings were  conducted  in a manner identical to that
 described for the grid borings.
      Six of the FSA 10-foot  borings were  conducted  by  hand with  a
 4-inch bucket auger.   The auger  was decontaminated  at  the completion
 of each  interval.   At  locations  FSA09  and  FSA10, PVC casing was  pushed
 downhole 5  feet  to prevent a cave-in while augering the lower inter-
 vals  and to aid  the grouting process.  The PVC casing  was decontami-
 nated between boreholes.
      Six 10-foot  borings  (FSB01  through 06) were conducted along the
 southwest side of  the  berm that  borders the liner-covered area (Figure
 2-3).  The  borings  were spaced at intervals averaging  approximately
 125 feet.   Each of  the borings was drilled using a drill rig and sam-
 pled  in  the manner  described  for the 10-foot  grid borings.  Upon com-
 pletion,  all  holes  were grouted to the surface with portland cement.
     Samples  from  the  lower  two  intervals  (5  to 7.5 feet and 7.5 to 10
 feet) in each boring were archived pending evaluation of analytical
 data from the upper intervals (0 to 5 feet).  Archived samples
 selected for  analysis are discussed in Section 3.2.4.  Samples from
 the upper three intervals of  all FSB borings were analyzed in the
 laboratory for pH,  lead, and percent moisture.
     Two 10-foot borings penetrated the foundation of the Sapp Battery
 plant building (Figure 2-3).   One boring was drilled through the
 foundation of the battery cutting saw room (FSC02), and the other was
drilled through the storage room foundation on the north side of the
building (FSC01).  A 12-inch-diameter hole was first cut through the
                                   2-13

-------
concrete foundation at each location  to  provide  access for the  auger.
The borings and sampling were conducted  with  a drill rig  in the manner
described above for the 10-foot  grid  borings.  Upon completion, both
holes were grouted to the surface with Portland  cement.
     The lower two samples from  each  boring were archived pending
evaluation of analytical data from the upper  intervals.   The upper
intervals (0 to 5 feet) were analyzed for  pH, lead, cadmium, antimony,
and percent moisture.
     Three borings were drilled  in the battery casing dump adjacent
to the Northwest Swamp (Figure 2-3).  Two  of  the borings  (FSL01 and
FSL02) were drilled to 15 feet;  FSL03 was  drilled to only 10 feet.
Borings FSLOl and FSL02 were located  in  the north-central and south-
central portions of the filled area,  respectively.  In both cases, 15
feet of auger flight was drilled through the  fill  and then extracted
up the drill rig derrick with a  winch.   The depth of fill was deter-
mined from the augers and a sample was taken  from mid-depth of  the
fill in each case (and analyzed  for lead,  cadmium,  antimony, pH,  and
percent moisture).  Because the  depth of fill was shallower than
expected in each case (2 feet at FS101  and 6.5 feet at FSL02),  a  third
boring was conducted on the western edge of the  fill area, adjacent to
the Northwest Swamp, to confirm  the findings  of  the first two borings.
Boring FSL03 indicated fill and  sparse battery casings to a depth of
approximately 5 feet.  No sample was  collected from FSL03 since it was
drilled for exploratory purposes only and  was outside the planned
scope of work.

2.2.2  Fixation Study
     Based on the initial data,  lead-tainted  soil samples were  col-
lected 1n the soil sampling grid near the  northeast portion of  the
landfill.  Composite samples weighing about  2,500 grams  each were
collected from the 0 to 5-foot and 5  to  10-foot  intervals.   The method
of collection was the same as described  earlier.  These  samples were
shipped to E & E's laboratory immediately  following collection  to
undergo the fixation study.
     Two basic fixation methods  were evaluated  for leachate  production
of contaminated soils from the Sapp Battery site.  The  fixation
methods chosen for study were cementitious and  pozzolanic cementation.
                                   2-14

-------
 Much of the  information concerning these techniques is proprietary;
 therefore, development of solidification matrices was based on infor-
 mation  contained  in Morgan _ejt _aj_. (1984).
      The cementitious  (cement-based) solidification technique involves
 the sealing  of  contaminated soil in a matrix of portland cement,
 whereas the  pozzolanic solidification technique involves the sealing
 of  contaminated soil in a matrix of lime and fly ash.  In the scope of
 work, the pozzolanic technique called for a matrix of cement kiln dust
 and fly ash; however, the cement kiln dust was unavailable and lime
 was substituted.
      The study consisted of fixing contaminated soil from the 0 to 5-
 foot  and 5 to 10-foot depth intervals.  The composite was divided into
 100-gram samples to be used in the fixing process.  Samples from each
 depth interval were mixed with varying percentages of solidification
 agent (cement or lime and fly ash)  and water.  Three cement/soil  com-
 binations and three lime/fly ash/soil combinations were mixed for each
 depth interval.  Tables 2-4 and 2-5 outline the amounts used for each
 mix.
     Due to the dryness of the soils at the time of fixing., 30 weight
 percent  water was added to the solidification agent/soil mixture to
 assure  that binding would occur.  This weight percentage of water was
 selected based on a fixation study by Morgan et_ aj_. (1984).  The mix-
 ing of  dry soil with dry solidification agent did not produce a bound
matrix.   Addition of water was necessary to solidify the soils.
     The following procedure was used in mixing the solidification
 agent and contaminated soil:

     o  To prepare the soil  composites, all of the soils from each
        respective depth interval (0 to 5 feet and 5 to 10 feet)  were
        placed in a clean container and mixed with a stainless steel
        tablespoon until  homogeneous.

     o  To prepare the soil/cement  mixtures, 100 grams of soil from
        each  depth interval  composite was placed in a clean container
        along with an appropriate amount of cement in accordance with
        Table 2-4,  and mixed with a stainless steel tablespoon until
                                   2-15
     pacer

-------
                         Table 2-4

         SOIL SOLIDIFICATION - CE^NTITIOUS MATRIX
 Depth
Interval     Soil: Cement      Soil        Cement       Water
 (feet)         Ratio         (grams)      (grams)     (grams)
0-5             1:0.5          100          50         45


                1:1.0          100         100         60


                1:1.5          100         150         75


5-10            1:0.5          100          50         45


                1:1.0          100         100         60


                1:1.5          100         150         75
                            2-16

-------
           homogeneous.   If  the mix remained "powdery" and did not bind,
           the corresponding amount of water was added and mixed until
           homogeneous.

        o  To prepare the soil/fly ash/lime mixtures, 100 grams of soil
           from each  depth interval composite was placed in a clean con-
           tainer along  with an appropriate amount of fly ash and lime in
           accordance with Table 2-5, and mixed with a stainless steel
           tablespoon until  homogeneous.  If the mixture remained "pow-
           dery" and  did not bind, the corresponding amount of water was
           added and  mixed until homogeneous.

        Each  of the 12 solidification mixes was allowed to dry for a
   minimum of 24 hours.   After tne 24-hour drying period had elapsed, the
   12 solidification  samples, along with two control samples (a 100-gram
   sample from the 0  to  5-foot soil composite and a 100-gram sample from
   the 5 to 10-foot soil  composite) were analyzed for EP toxicity.  A
   total of 14 EP toxicity tests were conducted.
        Based on the  priority pollutant confirmation study, lead- con-
   taminated  soil samples were obtained adjacent to location FSG54.
   These samples, however, exhibited such low lead concentrations that an
   accurate analysis  could not be performed, i.e., only 2.62 mg/kg lead
   was detected in the non-fixed control sample for EP toxicity analysis.
        As a  result,  a new sample collection scheme was developed.  This
   consisted  of compositing  portions of samples from locations FSG-53A,
   B, C;  FSG-76A, B,  C;  and  FSG-87A, B, and C.  For compositing purposes,
   these samples were sieved through a 10-mesh screen and homogenized  in
   a  glass jar with a spatula.  Analysis of the composite sample showed a
   concentration of 71,000 mg/kg.  In accordance with the procedures
   described  above, three pozzolanic solidification mixes, three cementi-
   tious solidification  mixes, and one control sample were prepared for
   the EP Toxicity test.   The results of this revised fixation study  are
   presented  and discussed in Section 3.2.7.
                                    2-17
'ecvcied

-------
               Table  2-5
SOIL SOLIDIFICATION - POZZOLANIC MATRIX
Depth
Interval
(feet)
0-5


5-10


Soil:
Pozzalime
Ratio
1:0.5
1:1.0
1:1.5
1:0.5
1:1.0
1:1.5
Soil
(grama)
100
100
100
100
100
100
Fly Aah
(grams)
25
50
75
25
50
75
Lime
(grama)
25
50
75
25
50
75
Water
(grams)
45
60
75
45
60
75
                2-18

-------
 2.3   SEDIMENT SAMPLING
      Sediment samples were collected from a total  of  36  locations:
 2.5-foot borings at 12 locations, 5-foot borings  at 15 locations, and
 10-foot borings at nine locations (see Table 2-6).  These  borings were
 conducted in swamp areas both on- and off-site.   Sediment  sample loca-
 tions  are given in Figures 2-4 and 2-5.
      Sediment samples were analyzed for  pH, lead,  cadmium,  and anti-
 mony.  Sediment sample collection involved the use of a  4-inch stain-
 less  steel bucket auger.  All samples were collected  using  disposable
 plastic spoons and homogenized in plastic zip-lock bags  prior to being
 placed into 8-ounce sample jars.   Plastic was used for sample collec-
 tion  and homogenization in order to reduce the potential for outside
metals to contaminate the sediment sample.  In some  instances, how-
 ever, extremely competent clays were encountered  and  the use of plas-
tic spoons was not practical.  Consequently, stainless steel spoons
were  used for sample collection.
     Sediment sample collection techniques were similar  to those used
for soil sampling.  The samples were collected as composites over
 specific depth intervals designated as interval A (0  to  0.5 foot),
 interval B (0.5 to 2.5 feet), interval C (2.5 to  5 feet),  interval  D
 (5 to 7.5 feet), and interval E (7.5 to 10 feet).
     Most sediment borings were conducted by two  field personnel  in
chest waders; however, several of the 5  and 10-foot  borings involved
the use of a 14-foot jon boat and up to  three persons.
     Of the 12 2.5-foot sediment samples (FMT01 through  05 and  FMT07
through 13), seven (FMT07 through 13) were collected  off-site to the
east-southeast in an area bordered by the railroad tracks, County  Road
276, and Williams Road (Figure 2-5).  This area encompasses approxi-
mately 1.5 square miles and includes Steele City, Steele City  Bay,  and
Little Dry Creek.   The remaining five 2.5-foot sediment  samples  (FMT01
through 05)  were collected in the Northwest Swamp (Figure  2-4).
     The original  location for FMT01 was situated on  top of a  grassy
knoll, 400 feet north-northwest of FMH04.  Field personnel decided to
move the FMT01 location 400 feet east of its original location,
slightly inside the perimeter of the Northwest Swamp.  This new
                                 2-19
  i oaoer

-------
                                         About 150 ft.

                                           toNE

                                           X
r\>
i
                            FORMER SAW

                             RESIDENCE
                                                                                                 	LEGEND 	



                                                                                                 •   2.5 Foot Boring



                                                                                                 A   10-Foot Boring



                                                                                                 *   5 Foot Boring
                                          0 50
                                                   2OO
                                                             SCALE

                                                            400
                                                                     600
800
                                                    SO
                                                           100
                                                                   ISO
                                                                          200 ME 7 EftS
                               Figure 2-4  ON-SITE AND ADJACENT SEDIMENT SAMPLE LOCATIONS

-------
                                         LEGEND —	
                                         3 6 Foot Depth Boring
                                         5 Fool Olplh Boring
                                         10-Foot O«pth Boring
                         SCALE
   0100  bOO
                1000
                             2000
          100  2OO
                       400
                                6OO
                                           3000 FEET
                                        800METEHS
Figure 2-5  OFF-SITE SEDIMENT SAMPLE LOCATIONS

-------
                                           Table 2-6

                          ORGANIZATION OF COLLECTED SEDIMENT SAMPLES
Prefix
 Code
Description
  Total
Locations
  Total
 Samples.
Analyzed1
 Total
Samples
Archived
Archived
 Samples
Analyzed
 FMH-      5-foot sediment borings
           conducted in East Swamp,
           Southeast Swamp, and Steele
           City Bay

 FMK-      10-foot sediment borings
           conducted primarily in the
           West Swamp and Steele City Bay

 FMT-      2.5-foot sediment borings
           conducted in the Northwest
           Swamp, east of the railroad
           tracks, primarily in Steele
           City Bay and Little Dry Creek
                             15
                             12
                  33
                                            31
                  27
                15
                              18
Key;

1.  Totals given include duplicate samples collected (OS*-}.

Note;  Samples collected for Priority Pollutant Confirmation Study not included.
                                              2-22

-------
  location  allowed collection of an FMT01 sediment sample at  a suffi-
  ciently discrete distance from FMT02 to maintain representativeness.
       Each 2.5-foot boring involved the collection of samples from the
  A  and B intervals.  All samples were collected with plastic spoons,
  homogenized  in plastic zip-lock storage bags, and placed into the
  appropriate 8-ounce sample jar.  Spoons and bags were discarded  after
  each  use.  Between each sampling interval, the bucket auger was
  scrubbed with trisodium phosphate, rinsed with tap water, and then
  rinsed with distilled water.  The 24 samples were analyzed  for pH,
  lead,  cadmium, and antimony.
       Of the fifteen 5-foot sediment borings, eight were located  in the
  East  Swamp (FMH01 through 08, Figure 2-4); four were located in  Steele
  City  Bay, south of the site and west of the railroad tracks (FMH12
  through 15, Figure 2-5); and three were located in the Southeast Swamp
  (FMH09 through 11, Figure 2-4).  Samples were collected over the A,  B,
  and C  intervals using the same sampling and decontamination techniques
  as for the 2.5-foot borings.  However, given the fluid nature of the
  sediments and the associated greater potential for caving-in of  the
  hole,  a 5-foot length of PVC casing was advanced downhole simul-
  taneously with the augering. This technique facilitated proper sam-
  pling  and decreased the possibility of cross-contamination  between
  sampling intervals.  The PVC casing was decontaminated after each
  borehole.   The A and B interval samples were analyzed for pH, lead,
  cadmium,  and antimony; the C interval  samples were archived pending
  evaluation of the analytical results for the A and B horizons.
      Of the nine 10-foot sediment sampling borings, five were located
  in the West Swamp (FfKOl through 05; Figure 2-4); one was located on
 the north  side of County Road 280, adjacent to the culvert  that  was
 constructed in the original  drainage connection between the West Swamp
 and Steele City Bay (FMC08,  Figure 2-5); two were located in the
 northwestern and northeastern corners  of that portion of Steele  City
 Bay west  of the railroad tracks (FMK07 and 06, respectively; Figure
 2-5);  and  one was located south of the western site boundary, between
 two cleared areas where apparently there may have once existed swamp-
  like conditions (FIK09; Figure 2-5).  However, the lithologies encoun-
 tered  in borehole FM<09 had  greater affinity to the soil borehole
 lithologies than the sediment borehole lithologies.
                                   2-23
-^cycled saoer

-------
     Samples were collected  over  the A,  B, C, D,  and E  intervals for
each 10-foot boring using  the  same  sampling  and decontamination tech-
niques as for the 5-foot  borings.   However,  in most instances  stain-
less steel  spoons were used  to collect the 5 to 7.5-foot and 7.5 to
10-foot samples,  due to the  occurrence of an extremely  competent clay
at these horizons which made the  use of  plastic spoons  impractical.
Similar to the bucket auger, the  stainless steel  spoons were scrubbed
with trisodium phosphate,  rinsed  with tap water,  and then rinsed with
distilled water between major  sampling intervals.  The  A, B, and C
interval samples  (0 to 5  feet) were analyzed for  pH, lead, cadmium,
and-antimony, and the D and  E  interval samples  (5  to 10 feet)  were
archived pending  evaluation  of the  analytical results for the  A, B,
and C horizons.
                                   2-24

-------
   2.4   GROUNDWATER  INVESTIGATION
   2.4.1  Residential Well  Sampling
        As  requested  by  FDER, 25 residential wells  (Figure 2-6) were
   sampled  during the first week of fieldwork.  These  samples  were
   analyzed  for  lead, cadmium,  nickel,  arsenic, manganese, aluminum,
   selenium,  and antimony at detection  limits specified  in the Quality
   Assurance  Project  Plan.  Three  duplicate  samples  and  one  trip  bottle
   blank were obtained and  analyzed to  meet  QA/QC requirements.
        Each  residential well was  allowed to flow for  about  5  minutes  in
   order to purge the system prior to sampling.  All residential  well
   samples were  preserved with  nitric acid,  iced in  coolers, and  shipped
   to the E & E  laboratory.  The pH, specific conductivity,  and tempera-
   ture of each well were measured and  recorded in  the field.

   2.4.2  Monitoring Well Installation  and Development
       To better delineate the extent  of groundwater  contamination  at
  the site, 13 new monitoring wells were added to the existing network
  of 29 monitoring wells and two  plant wells (Figure  2-7).  The  addi-
  tions consisted of five wells approximately 130 feet  deep,  four wells
  approximately 60 feet deep,  and four wells approximately  20 feet  deep.
       Many of the new wells were clustered in order  to evaluate hydrau-
  lic head differences and water  quality variations between aquifer  sys-
  tems.  Hence,  two entirely new clusters containing  shallow, inter-
  mediate,  and deep wells were installed in the eastern area  of  the  site
  in the direction of regional  groundwater  flow.   In  addition, wells
  were installed in the unsampled aquifer systems  at  existing locations
  MW-06, MW-09,  and MVI-12 in order to  provide clusters.  For  background
  purposes, existing residential wells were identified, and a single
  shallow well  was installed at a northwest location  that had not yet
  been characterized.
       The five  approximately 130-foot wells were  installed concurrently
  with  the  eight shallower wells.  Where possible, both drill rigs
  employed  the hollow stem auger technique.  When conditions  did not
  permit the use of hollow stem augers, a fluid-rotary  technique was
  used.   In these cases, biodegradable revert was  used  as the drilling
  fluid  to  help  prevent  the introduction of extraneous  metals into  the
                                     2-25

recycled oaper

-------
Figure 2-6  LOCATIONS OF RESIDENTIAL WELLS SAMPLED NOVEMBER
          2-4,1985.

                           2-26

-------
IN)
I
ro
                                                   MW12A
                                              FORMER SAPP
                                               RESIDENCE
                                                   o  so
                                                           200
                                                                      SCALE
                                                                     40O
                                                                              600
                                                                                       800 FEET
                                                      010
                                                             50
                                                                     100
                                                                            160
                                                                                    200 METERS
                                      Figure 2-7  LOCATIONS OF SAPP BATTERY SITE MONITORING WELLS
                                                  (Includes original site wells DW-01 and DW-02 as well as
                                                  plugged monitoring well MW—02A)

-------
groundwater.  The excess revert  displaced  from  backfilling  the  annul us
in the borehole was sprayed with clean water onto the  site  surface  and
left to biodegrade.  Table 2-7 provides data on  the  drilling  technique
used for each of the 13 new wells.  Appendix D contains the drillers'
logs.
     Well construction (Figure 2-8) consisted of  inserting  a  2-inch
inside-diameter, flush-threaded, Schedule  40 PVC casing with  a  10-
foot, 0.010-slotted PVC screen at the bottom into the  newly drilled
borehole.  Clean gravel was placed in the  annular space between the
well screen and borehole wall to act as a  filter between  the  screen
and the formation.  This gravel extended from the borehole bottom to  2
feet above the screen and casing joint.  The next 2  feet  above  the
gravel was filled with a bentonite plug to seal the  screen from the
above annulus.  The annular area above the bentonite plug was back-
filled with a 50/50 bentonite/lean concrete mixture  to a  level  2 feet
below the ground surface.  The remaining 2 feet was  filled with 100X
concrete and covered by a 2- by 2-foot square concrete pad formed to
route drainage away from the well.  Finally, a 4-inch  nominal-diameter
steel security cover with keyed-alike locks was placed over the pro-
truding well pipe and set into the moist concrete.   All wells were
then surveyed accurately for location and  elevation  during development
of the site base map.
     After each well had been completed, it was developed by  forcing
compressed air against the well screen wall for 10 minutes and  then
stopping the air for two minutes to let the well fully recharge.  Each
well was subjected to this cycle of air purging and  surging until such
parameters as pH, temperature, and specific conductivity  had  sta-
bilized.

2.4.3  Monitoring Well Sample Collection
     Immediately prior to sampling each well, a total  of  three  well
volumes was purged.  This purging phase was used to  obtain samples
in-situ for determination of ambient aquifer system  conditions  follow-
ing development and well stabilization.  Teflon or PVC bailers  were
used to collect all samples.  Samples to be analyzed for  metals were
preserved with nitric acid, iced in coolers, and shipped  to the E & E
laboratory.  In addition to the  sampling effort  (discussed  in Section
                                   2-28

-------
                                     Table 2-7



               CONSTRUCTION DATA FOR  SUPPLEMENTARY MONITORING WELLS
Well
Number
MW06A
MW06C
MW09A
MW09B
MW12A
MW12B
MW21A
MW21B
MW21C
MW22A
MW22B
MW22C
MW23C
Drilling Technique
8-inch hollow stem auger
6-inch hollow stem auger
Fluid rotary
6- inch hollow stem auger
8-inch hollow stem auger
Fluid rotary
8-inch hollow stem auger
Fluid rotary
6- inch hollow stem auger
8-inch hollow stem auger
6-inch hollow stem auger
6- inch hollow stew auger
6-inch hollow stem auger
Depth Below
Land Surface
(feet)
134
21
127
53
130
60
131
60
21
134
62
26
17
Well Head
Elevation
Above Mean
Sea Level
(feet)
133.66
133.57
143.75
143.63
13B.60
138.53
134.14
134.32
133.06
1 37 . 30
136.19
136.63
140.39
                                      2-29
paper

-------
• ••*
             Ms
                          4" STEEL SECURITY CASE WITH LOCK
                          PVC WELL CAP
                          GROUND LEVEL
                          CONCRETE

                          2" PVC WELL CASING

                          8"BOREHOLE
                         50/50 CONCRETE-BENTONITE GROUT
                         BENTONITE PLUG
                         WELL SCREEN
                          GRAVEL PACK
Figure 2-3 TYPICAL MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION
                           2-30

-------
 3.4),  pH,  specific  conductivity,  and  temperature  were  measured  and
 recorded  in  the  field.
      All  on-site monitoring  wells  (i.e.,  the 13 new  wells,  the  29
 existing  wells,  and  the  two  plant  wells)  were sampled  and  analyzed  for
 lead,  cadmium,  arsenic,  manganese,  aluminum,  selenium,  and  antimony.
 Three  duplicate  samples,  two trip  bottle  blanks,  and four  equipment
 rinsate  samples  were included with  these  samples  in  order  to  meet
 QA/QC  requirements.   The  duplicate  samples  were collected  from  wells
 selected  in  the  field.   All  parameters  were analyzed at  detection
 limits specified in  the  Quality Assurance Project Plan.

 2.4.4  Slug  and  Specific  Capacity  Tests
     A total  of  nine slug tests and four  specific capacity  tests were
 performed  at  the site following the monitoring well  sampling  effort  in
 mid-December  1985.   The  objective  of  this study was  to  obtain general-
 ized hydraulic conductivity  (K), transmissivity (T), seepage  velocity
 (V), specific capacity (Cs),  and well yield (Wy)  data  for  the on-site
 aquifer systems.
     Slug  tests  were conducted  in monitoring  wells MW-06A,  MW-06B,
 MW-06C, MW-12A,  MW-12B, MW-12C, MW-22A, MW-22B, and  MW-22C  (Figure
 2-7).  These  wells were  selected for  slug testing because  they  consti-
 tute clusters that penetrate  each of  the  three major aquifer  systems.
 In addition,  these locations  represent  a  cross section  of  the hydro-
 geologic conditions  across the site.  Each  slug test was conducted  by
 introducing a known  volume of  clean water into the well  and con-
 tinuously monitoring the  water level  response using  a  transducer
 system.
     In addition  to  the  slug  testing, specific capacity tests were
 performed at wells MW-02B, MW-068,  MW-14A,  and MW-14C.   These wells
were chosen because  they  offered the  best combination  of water- trans-
mitting characteristics  (as  defined by  the  recharge  rates  observed
during the purging operations) and  lithology with respect  to  the
requirements for  a successful test  and  representativeness.   Each of
these tests involved  pumping  the respective well  for about  1  hour  at
full  capacity and measuring  drawdown  continuously throughout  this
period with the  transducer system.
                                   2-31

-------
                     3.   RESULTS  OF ANALYSES AND
                         DATA INTERPRETATION
3.1  PRIORITY POLLUTANT CONFIRMATION  STUDY
3.1.1  Soils
     The five soil samples and one duplicate  sample were analyzed for
priority pollutant metals, sulfate, volatile  organics, acid/base/
neutral organics, and pesticides (Appendix  B).
     FSA09P (and duplicate sample DSA09P) yielded the highest levels
of inorganics.  Lead concentration is very  high  in the sample, and
arsenic and sulfates are present at levels  significantly above the
other soil samples.
     One or more of the following volatile  organics were detected in
all of the soil samples:  acetone; 1,1,1-trichloroethane; chloroform;
methylene chloride; and 2-butanone.   The occurrence of these contami-
nants in the samples is attributable  to  laboratory cross contamina-
tion.  All of these compounds are common laboratory solvents, and each
was found to be present in the laboratory instrument blank  associated
with this soil sample run.
     Base/neutral analyses of the soil samples  revealed the presence
of an array of polynuclear aromatics  and phthalates.  However, the
bulk of these compounds were detected in FSA09P (and duplicate DSA09P)
only.  Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate and di-n-butyl phthalate  were  the
only base/neutral organic compounds detected  in FS623P, FS654P,
FSA06P, and the background sample FSY01.  The occurrence of phthalates
in the samples is not easily explained;  however, bis(2-ethylhexyl)-
phthalate is a common cross contaminant  derived from both the  labora-
tory and field decontamination processes.  Plasticizers  leaching from
buckets, brushes, water jugs, sprayers,  insect  repellent,  and  PVC pipe
                                 3-1

-------
are potential  sources  leading  to  cross contamination of this compound.
It should be noted that  bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate was found to be
considerably higher in FSA09P  and duplicate DSA09P (15,000 ug/kg and
14,000 ug/kg,  respectively).   Again,  leaching plasticizers are the
probable souYce,  as this sample  location was in an area of densely
deposited plastic battery chips.
     The analysis of soil sample  FSA09P  also showed the presence of
10 polynuclear aromatic  compounds (PNAs).  Chrysene was detected at
800 ug/kg, phenanthrene  was  detected  at  700 ug/kg in FSA09P, and
naphthalene at 500 ug/kg in  the duplicate.  The remaining PNA com-
pounds were found to be  present but below the quantifiable detection
limit of 500 ug/kg.  It  is likely that these compounds are present in
this area due to residual motor oils  and/or fuels associated with run-
off from the plant, or in the  fill material (greasy battery casings)
placed here.  N-nitrosodiphenylamine  and 4-nitrophenol were also found
below quantifiable detection limits.
     A soil sampling equipment rinsate was collected at one point
after a decontamination  period.   Trace amounts of sulfate, lead, and
nickel were detected.  The results indicate that cleanliness of equip-
ment was adequate and that residual metals contaminants were of such
low levels as not to affect  the  integrity of data.  The presence of
acetone; 1,1,1-trichloroethane;  and methylene chloride in the bottle
blank is associated with laboratory  sources  (as evidenced by labora-
tory instrument blanks and trip  bottle blank analysis).

3.1.2  Sediments
     The five sediment samples collected were  analyzed  in the  labora-
tory for priority pollutant metals,  sulfate, volatile organics,  acid/
base/neutral organics, and pesticides (Appendix B).
     FMH17, collected from the West  Swamp, yielded the highest  concen-
trations of metals.  Very high lead (6,560 mg/kg)  and elevated  levels
of antimony, arsenic, and copper are most notable  in FMH17.  Arsenic
was found  at 1.76 mg/kg   in the East Swamp  (FMH18),  and  cadmium  was
present in the East and   Southeast swamps (0.975 mg/kg  and 0.19  mg/kg,
respectively).
     Acetone; 1,1,1-trichloroethane;  and chloroform are present in all
samples.   2-butanone  is   present  in all  samples except  FMH20 (Northwest
                                  3-2

-------
 Swamp).   As  these  compounds are common laboratory cross contaminants
 (and were each present  in the laboratory instrument blank),  it  is most
 probable  that their presence is entirely attributed to a laboratory
 source.   Methylene chloride occurs in FMH19 and 20 and can be attrib-
 uted to sample bottle preparation, since it was also detected in the
 trip bottle  blank  (S8B01).  Ethylbenzene and benzene were detected in
 the Southeast Swamp (FMH19) below the 50 ug/kg quantifiable detection
 limit.  If these contaminants are not derived from a laboratory
 source, it is possible that they could have been contributed by vehi-
 cle exhaust, or runoff associated with the adjacent County Road 280
 and nearby railroad bed.  The presence of naphthalene (500 ug/kg)  in
 FMH19  is  quite possibly associated with the asphalt pavement of County
 Road 280,  where tars may leach this material and runoff may carry  it  a
 short distance to  the Southeast Swamp.
     Toluene was detected below the quantifiable detection limit  in
 both the  East Swamp (FMH18) and Southeast Swamp (FMH19), and
 4-methylphenol was detected at 1,100 ug/kg in the East Swamp.
     The  presence  of phthalates in all sediment samples, including the
 background location FMH16, suggests possible cross contamination from
 plastic decontamination containers, etc.  (see Section 3.1.1).  The
 highest concentration of bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate occurs in the  West
 Swamp sediment sample (FMH17,  3,000 ug/kg) and may reflect the  leach-
 ing  of plasticizers from the large volume of plastic battery chips  in
 this small area.

 3.1.3  Surface Water
     Lead was detected in all  surface water samples, including  the
 background sample FSW01 (0.014 ppm) collected as part of the priority
 pollutant confirmation survey (Appendix B).  However, the concentra-
 tion in the West  Swamp was two orders of magnitude higher than  in  the
 other three locations (1.01 ppm and 1.06 ppm in FSW02 and duplicate
 sample OSW02, respectively).  Low levels of sulfate (24 to 66 ppm)
were also detected at all four locations.
     Arsenic, silver,  and zinc were each detected in only one sample
 (FSW03, 0.006 ppm;  FSW02, 0.006 ppm; and FSW04, 0.034 pom, respective-
 ly).  In contrast,  nickel was  detected in the duplicate West Swamp
sample (DSW02,  0.023 ppm), as  well as in the background sample (FSW01,
                                   3-3
    oaoer

-------
0.038 ppm).   As  with  the soil  and  sediment samples, the only volatile
organic compounds  detected  in  the  surface water samples were compounds
such as acetone; chloroform; 1,1,1-trichloroethane; and methylene
chloride which also-were detected  in the laboratory instrument blank,
and hence are attributed to laboratory sources.  Of the base/neutral
extractable  compounds,  only bis(2-ethy1hexyl)phthalate was detected,
the highest  concentration occurring in background sample FSW01 (27
ppb).  Acid  compound  2-methylphenol was detected at 270 ppb in sample
FSW02, but its presence could  not  be confirmed in duplicate sample
DSW02 or after a re-extraction and analysis  of FSW02.

3.1.4  Groundwater
     All on-site monitoring well samples (FEW03C, FEW03BB, FEW03A,  and
FEW09C) exhibited  lead  contamination, whereas lead was not detected  in
the background well sample  (FRW01) (Appendix B).  The samples from  the
surficial aquifer  system (FEW03C and FEW09C) showed the greatest  lead
contamination (4.96 and 6.27 ppm,  respectively), whereas the samples
from the underlying intermediate and Floridan aquifer systems (FEW03BB
and FEW03A,  respectively) exhibited a progressive decrease in the
level of lead contamination (1.28  and 0.609  ppm, respectively).   Only
samples FEW03BB and FEW03C  exhibited sulfate concentrations above the
250 ppm recommended USEPA and  FDER drinking  water standards (2,000  and
330 ppm, respectively).
     Antimony, arsenic, and cadmium concentrations were found to  be
above primary EPA  drinking  water standards  and FDER standards for
arsenic and cadmium (0.05 ppm  for  arsenic,  and 0.01 ppm for cadmium)
in sample FEW03C (0.118 ppm antimony, and 0.282 ppm arsenic) and
sample FEW03BB (0.246 ppm cadmium).  THere  are no primary or secondary
FDER drinking water standards  for  antimony.  Relatively high nickel
and zinc concentrations were also  detected  in sample  FEW038B  (0.495
and 2.20 ppm, respectively).  However,  this zinc concentration  is sig-
nificantly below the recommended primary EPA and FDER drinking  water
standard (5.0 ppm).  There is  no recommended or required  standard for
nickel.  Primary drinking water standards  were  used for  comparison
purposes, as these relate to public  health.
     Similar to the soil, sediment,  and surface water samples,  the
only volatile organic compounds detected in the groundwater  samples
                                 3-4

-------
 were  compounds such as acetone; 1,1,1-trichloroethane;  and  methylene
 chloride which were also detected in the laboratory instrument  blank,
 and hence are attributed to laboratory sources.   Of the base/neutral
 extractable compounds, only bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate  was  detected.
 However, it was detected in all of the samples,  including the sam-
 ple obtained from the background well.  Of the acid compounds,
 2-methylphenol was found to be present at a level below the detection
 limits in sample FEW03C.
       Similar to the results for the soil sampling equipment rinsate
 and soil bottle blank, only trace metal  concentrations  were detected
 in the groundwater sampling equipment rinsate.  The only organic  com-
 pounds detected in the rinsate and bottle blanks were those attribut-
 able  to laboratory sources.

 3.1.5  Conclusion
      The analytical results of the priority pollutant confirmation
 survey for soil  and sediment samples suggest that lead  contamination
 is the primary problem, especially in the West Swamp and on its west
 bank.   These samples also showed elevated concentrations of antimony,
 arsenic, and cadmium.   Based on the findings of the priority pollutant
 sampling,  all  of these parameters were chosen for analysis  except
 arsenic.  The selected metals were also likely constituents of  the
 type of batteries processed at the site, based on findings  of earlier
 investigations.
      Of the organics detected in soils and sediments, most  notable  was
 the occurrence of phthalates and PNAs in the battery chip fill  asso-
 ciated with FSA09.  These contaminants can be expected  to occur where
 heavy concentrations of crushed automobile batteries result in  weath-
 ering plastics as well as residual oils and greases. Assuming  this  to
 be typical  of  battery casing fill, no further organics  analysis of
 subsequent  soil  and sediment samples was deemed necessary.
      The analytical  results of the priority pollutant confirmation
 survey for  surface water samples suggested that lead contamination  was
 the primary problem and that the highest levels of lead contamination
 were restricted  to the West Swamp.  Given that lead contamination of
 these  surface  waters is (1) assumed to be a direct result of runoff
 from contaminated soils and (2) appears to be restricted to on-site
                                    3-5
'ecvc:ed aaoer

-------
 locations, then any remedial  action directed  toward  elimination of
 soil contamination should also serve to  eliminate the source of sur-
 face water contamination.  In light of the  above, and in order to
 avoid duplication with the EPA-funded study by  Dr. Livingston men-
 tioned in Section 1 and with  the 1983 FDER  sampling  (Watts 1984), it
 was considered unnecessary to collect additional surface water samples
 during the main part of the investigation.
     The analytical results for the groundwater samples indicated
 that all three of the on-site aquifer systems were contaminated with
 lead, and thus that lead should be  the major  focus of the subsequent
 investigation.  It was also determined that groundwater samples should
 be analyzed for cadmium, antimony,  arsenic, and selenium because each
 of these metals had been detected at a concentration above the USEPA
 and FDER drinking water standards during the  priority pollutant
 investigation or the 1983 FDER sampling  effort  (Watts 1984).  Finally,
 aluminum and manganese were also included for analysis because the
 results of the 1983 FDER sampling effort (Watts 1984) indicated that
 these metals were occurring in high concentrations due to the decom-
 position of soil clays caused by the sulfuric acid.
     Despite the presence of  sulfate concentrations  above the drinking
 water standard in two samples, it was decided by FDER not to include
 this parameter in the main investigation because the existing data
 base from the FDER 1983 sampling effort  was considered adequate.
     Although relatively high concentrations  of zinc and nickel did
 occur in one sample, it was not considered  necessary to include these
metals among the analytical parameters.  Zinc was not present in con-
 centrations above the drinking water standard.  Nickel (for which
 there is no standard) was found in  the background sample at approxi-
 mately the same level as had  been detected  in most of the on-site
monitoring well samples collected by FDER in  1983 (Watts 1984).
                                 3-6

-------
 3.2  SOILS
     'The shallow (0  to 10-foot)  subsurface lithology at the site con-
 sists of two units:   a unit of sandy clay/clayey sand overlying a unit
 of stiff, tight clay.   Both of these units exhibit great variability
 in their textural  characteristics and color.   In general,  however,  the
 sandy clay/clayey  sand is fine to medium-grained and tan to orange-
 brown in color.  In  contrast, the clay unit contains little sand (al-
 though rounded  sand-,  gravel-, and pebble-sized quartz was noted on
 occasion) and is most  commonly maroon or red with white to gray
 marbling.
      Although the  clay unit is usually encountered within  5 feet of
 land  surface, lateral  correlation of lithologic units is extremely
 difficult because  of the extensive earth-moving activities which
 occurred at  the  site in the 1970s, as indicated by aerial  photographs.
 This  extensive  earth movement is also reflected in the three large
 fill  areas on-site where battery chips mixed with the sandy clay/
 clayey sand  were found at depths as great as 6.5 feet northeast of the
 plant  foundation,  and  possibly as great as 10 feet in the  Northwest
 Landfill  area (Figures 3-1 and 3-13).
      The following discussion presents the analytical data for the
 soil  sampling effort (see also Table C-l in Appendix C-l).  Results
 for the  equipment rinsate and trip bottle blank samples are discussed
 in Section 4.

 3.2.1  Surface Soils (0 to 0.5-Foot Interval)
     All  of the  soil samples were analyzed in the laboratory for pH.
 For the total suite of surface samples (0 to  0.5-foot depth), includ-
 ing those collected  as surface composites (FSS01 through 18) and those
 collected at the A interval  of the borings, pH ranged from 2.66
 (FSE08) to 8.54  (FSC01).  For these samples,  pH values above 6.5 were
 generally associated with those samples exhibiting the highest lead
 concentrations (Figures 3-2  and 3-3).  In many cases, these are also
the areas that contain battery chips (Figure  3-1).  However, because
there are several exceptions to this trend, it is not possible to draw
a direct correlation of pH to depth of chips, lead, antimony, or
Cadmium.
                                 3-7
    cdoer

-------
FSG  FSG  FSG
33»  34»  3S»
                 FSG  FSG
                 44 •  45 •
                                    LEGEND	

                                  Chips greater than
                                  2 foot depth
                             ,'   j Chipi 1-2 foot
                              »-- depth

                               ?  Chips at unknown
                                  depth
            	i FSG  FSG  FSG
            S3* ! 54 •  55 •  56*
             1.0 '      0.5
                                          FSG
  FSS
  01*
                               SCALE
         0  SO  100    200    300    400    500    600 FEET
            0  10     40
                             80
                                     120      160 METERS
Figure 3-1   OCCURRENCE OF BATTERY CHIPS (Depth In Feet)
                                  3-8

-------
I
UD
                                FORMER SAPf
                                 RESIDENCE
                                                                                                                   	LEGEND 	

                                                                                                                    Surface Composite
                                                                                                                    Sample.  Analysis
                                                                                                                    forpH. Pb.Cd.Sb,
                                                                                                                    and % Molttuc*

                                                                                                                    Suiiace Composite
                                                                                                                    Sample.  Analysis
                                                                                                                    for pH. Pb. and
                                                                                                                    % Multtui*
                                                                                                                NOTE: Double numbers
                                                                                                                indicate a duplicate sample
                                                                                                                was taken.
                                                 O 60
                                                          200
                                                                      SCALE

                                                                     40O
                                                                               600
                                                                                         800 FEET
                                                    010
                                                            60
                                                                     1OO
                                                                             160
                                                                                     200 METERS
                                    Figure 3-2   LEAD CONCENTRATIONS (mg/kg) IN THE SURFACE SOIL
                                                 COMPOSITE SAMPLES

-------
               FSG 1 pSG  KSG
                   24 «  25 •
                    26    22
                                /*—} Greater than 500
FSG  FSG  FSG
33*  34*  35 •
     2*6   42
                                    mg/kg of rb

                                    Not Applicable
                    FSG  FSG
                        45*
                    17
                                                   - -*•  394

                                                        332
                 PLASTIC LINER
                                             NOTE: Doubt* numtun
                                             indieaw a duplicate sampl*
                                             wvtakwi.
               50  100
                        200
                                SCALE
                              300   400
                                           500
                                                 600 FEET
              0 10
                      40
                              80
                                      120
                                               160 METERS
Figure 3-3   LEAD CONCENTRATIONS (mg/kg) IN THE A INTERVAL
            (0-0.5 Feet) SAMPLES OP ON-SITE SOIL BORINGS
                              3-10

-------
       Areas where lead concentrations were  lowest (surface samples on
  the'far eastern and northeastern portion of the site; Figures 3-2 and
  3-3) exhibited pH values  of  approximately  4 to 5.5.  There are no
  apparent indications of  a trend when comparing pH to lead, antimony,
  and cadmium concentrations in  the  B  interval (0.5 to 2.5 feet), C
  interval (2.5 to 5 feet),  D  interval (5 to 7.5 feet), and E interval
  (7.5 to 10 feet).  High  lead concentrations were noted in samples with
  pH values of less than 4.0,  greater than 6.5, and in between.  Simi-
  larly, samples with very  low lead  concentrations exhibit the same wide
  range of pH values.
       Analysis of the A interval samples and surface composite samples
  (FSS01 through 18) indicate  widespread lead contamination in the sur-
  face (Figures 3-2 and 3-3).                                   .
       The surface soils between the plastic liner and the West Swamp
  are grossly contaminated,  as indicated by  samples FSA05A through 10A,
  which exhibit lead concentrations  of 9,390 to 155,000 mg/kg.  Another
  area of gross contamination  occurs northeast of the plant foundation,
  where FSG86A and 96A show lead concentrations of 90,000 and 16,1007
  169,000 mg/kg, respectively.   Concentrations of 22,300 and 169,000
  mg/kg lead were recorded  in  the duplicate  sample analyses for FSG86A
  and 96A.  In the southwestern  corner of the Northwest Landfill area,
  FSG51A yielded 19,200 mg/kg  lead (22,700 mg/kg in the duplicate sample
  analysis).   Along the earthen  berm southwest of the plastic  liner,
  FSB03A exhibited 66,100 mg/kg  lead.
       Areas where high lead levels  (greater than 500 mg/kg) are found
  include:  (1) the battery chip-filled area between the West Swamp and
  the plastic liner,  (2) the battery chip-filled area northeast of the
  foundation, (3)  the northwest  battery casing landfill,  (4) the area
  around the truck weighing scales northwest of the plant foundation,
  (5) beneath the plant foundation at FSC02A, and (6) along the south-
  western side of the plastic  liner  extending to the south of  the West
  Swamp.   East of the West  Swamp, only FSE07A and FSS15 showed  lead
  levels greater than 500 mg/kg  (1,110 mg/kg and 1,670 mg/kg,  respec-
  tively).
       In the surface samples  analyzed for antimony  and cadmium,  it  is
  readily seen that the levels at which these metals occur generally  are
  proportional to the lead  concentrations  in the same  sample  interval.
                                   3-11
'?cvcied paper

-------
This is most evident in Figure 3-4,  where  lead  and  antimony  levels  are
compared for FSA01 through FSA13.   Antimony  and  cadmium were also
present in FSC02A (beneath the plant foundation), and  in  lesser con-
centrations on the east bank  of the West Swamp  (FSE05A),  and at sev-
eral locations around the Northwest Landfill.

3.2.2  B Interval Soils (0.5  to 2.5  feet)
     At the B interval (0.5 to 2.5  feet),  five distinct areas exhibit
lead concentrations greater than 500 mg/kg lead  (Figure 3-5).  The
area between the plastic liner and  the  West  Swamp remains highly con-
taminated, with FSA06B, FSA07B, and  FSA08B containing  57,000, 45,900,
and 29,800 mg/kg lead, respectively. A group of six grid locations
northeast of the plant foundation have  lead  concentrations ranging
from 3,940 to 96,600 mg/kg.  Battery chips and whole casings occur  in
this area to depths ranging from 3  to 6.5 feet.
     The Northwest Landfill area is  heavily  contaminated  with lead
over the B interval.  Whole battery casings, large  chips, and other
debris extend to at least this depth in the  fill throughout  the land-
fill area (as indicated at 10-foot  and  15-foot boring  locations).   The
lead concentration at FSG51 increases to 84,200  mg/kg  over the B
interval, whereas the lead levels at FSG23B  and  FSG53B increase with
depth to 4,790 and 16,700 mg/kg, respectively.
     Southwest of the plastic liner  and adjacent to the former loca-
tion of the acid holding pond,  FSB02B and  FSB03B showed 325  mg/kg lead
(746 mg/kg in the duplicate sample)  and 650  mg/kg lead, respectively.
South of the liner and the West Swamp,  FSB06B, FSA11B, and FSA13B
exhibited lead levels of 3,260, 4,750,  and 4,735 mg/kg (8,842 mg/kg in
the duplicate sample), respectively.
     Figure 3-6 indicates a continuing  correlation  between lead and
antimony.  In contrast, cadmium levels  are low,  occurring somewhat
more sporadically, and not necessarily  proportional to lead  concentra-
tions.

3.2.3  C Interval Soils (2.5  to 5.0 feet)
     At the C interval (2.5 to 5 feet), there  are four general areas
where high lead levels continue to  occur  (see  Figure 3-7).   Lead

-------
i?
 20
 n
 Q
     1OO



     go -



     80



     7O



     5O -i



     5O -



     40 -



     3O -



     20 -



     1O -
      o -4
       01  01  02  03  04  05  06  07  08  09  09  10   11


                 FSA SAMPLE NUMBERS FROM NORTH TO SOUTH
                                                         12  13
    SOO
Q.
0.
O
    3OO i
    10O -
       01  01  02  03  04   05  06  O7  08  09  O9  10  11

                 FSA SAMPLE NUMBERS FROM NORTH TO SOUTH
                                                         12  13
  Figure 3-4  LEAD VERSUS ANTIMONY IN THE A INTERVAL (0 to 0.5 foot depth)
            IN FSA SAMPLES ALONG THE WEST BANK OF THE WEST SWAMP
                                  1-13

-------
                                 mg/kg of Pb

                             N/A  Not Applicant
                                         NOTE: Ooufato numbm
                                         indican a duplicate (ample
                                         was taken.
            50 100
                     200
                            SCALE
                           300    400
                                       SOO
                                            600 FEET
            0  10
                   40
                           SO
                                   120
                                          160 METERS
Figure 3-5  LEAD CONCENTRATIONS (mg/kg) IN THE B INTERVAL
           (0.5-2.5 Feet) SAMPLES OF ON-SITE SOIL BORINGS
                           3-14

-------
     20 -
     10-
       01  02  03  04  05  03  00  07  OB  09   1O  11  12

                 FSA SAMPLE NUMBERS FROM NORTH TO SOUTH
                                              13
    soo
I
    TOO -
    600 -
    4OO-


    300-


    2OO-


    100-
           •9-
•f-
       01  02  O3  04  05  03  06  07  08  09   1O   11  12  13

                 F5A SAMPLE NUMBERS FROM NORTH TO SOUTH
                                              13
      Figure 3-6  LEAD VERSUS ANTIMONY IN THE B INTERVAL (0.5 to
                 2.5 foot depth) IN FSA SAMPLES ALONG THE WEST
                 BANK OF THE WEST SWAMP
                                  3-15
      caper

-------
                                 Greater than 500
                                 mg/kg of Pb
                             N/A  Not Applicable
                                          NOTE: Doubt* numbers
                                          indicate • duplicate sample
                                          was taken.
    01*
             so  100
                      200
                              SCALE
                             300   400
                                        500
600 FEET
             0 10
                            80
                                     120
                                             160 METERS
Figurt 3-7   LEAD CONCENTRATIONS (mg/kg) IN THE C INTERVAL
            (2.5-5.0 F«et) SAMPLES OF ON-SITE SOIL
            BORINGS
                               3-16

-------
 concentrations  in  the  area southwest of the plastic liner decrease to
 just  under  500  mg/kg in FSB02C and FSB03C (460 and 400 mg/kg,  respec-
 tively).   In  contrast, between the liner and the West Swamp, the lead
 levels  at FSA06C,  FSA07C, and FSA08C remain very high, ranging from
 6,560 to 28,100 mg/kg.
      The battery chip-filled area northeast of the plant foundation
 also  remains  highly lead-contaminated at the C interval.  Eight boring
 locations had lead levels greater than 500 mg/kg.  This indicates  more
 extensive lead  contamination laterally than at the B interval.  In
 addition, five  of  these locations show a substantial increase in lead
 concentrations  at this depth; in particular, FSG66 increased from  17
 mg/kg in the  B  interval to 6,560 mg/kg in the C interval,  whereas
 FSG76 increased from 8,320 mg/kg in the B interval to 25,300 mg/kg in
 the C interval.
      The Northwest Landfill area also continues to exhibit high lead
 levels  at the C interval, with FSL02 exhibiting a lead concentration
 of 27,500 mg/kg.   (FSL02 was conducted as a 15-foot boring in the
 landfill.)
      Lead occurs in FSG71C at 601 mg/kg, almost three times higher
 than  that detected in the overlying interval.  Similarly,  south of the
 West  Swamp, FSA11, FSA12, and FSA13 show increasing lead concentra-
 tions in the C  interval.
      As at the A and B intervals, antimony levels in the C interval
 FSA samples generally increase and decrease in parallel with the lead
 concentration (Figure 3-8).  Similarly, in the Northwest Landfill,
 antimony levels increase with increasing lead concentrations.   Cadmium
 is present  at 1.1 mg/kg in FSC02C (beneath the plant foundation),
 where the lead concentration is 24 mg/kg.
     A  single composite sample was collected at mid-depth of the bat-
 tery casing fill (6.5 feet total  depth).

 3.2.4   D and E  Interval Soils (5.0 to 7.5 Feet and 7.5 to 10.0 Feet)
     As  discussed in Section 2.2, samples from the 0 interval (5 to
 7.5 feet)  and E  interval  (7.5 to 10 feet) of the 48 FSB, FSC, and  FSG
borings  were archived pending evaluation of the analytical data from
the A, B,  and C  interval  samples.  Based on the results of the A,  B,
 and C evaluations,  it was determined that the D and E interval samples
                                  3-17

-------
g§
3(5
           02
   O3  04  O5  06  07   08  08   09   1O   11
     FSA SAMPLE NUMBERS FROM NORTH TO SOUTH
                                                        12   13
    16O
        01
O2  03  04  05  O6  07  O8  O8  09  10   11
      FSA SAMPLE NUMBERS FROM NORTH TO SOUTH
       Figure 3-8   LEAD VERSUS ANTIMONY IN THE C INTERVAL (2.5
                  to b.O root depth) IN FSA SAMPLES ALONG THE WEST
                  BANK OF THE WEST SWAMP
                                 3-18

-------
   from 27 locations  (54  samples) should be analyzed.  Of these 27
   locations,  18  (36  samples) were selected based on the occurrence of
   high lead concentrations  in the C interval, seven (14 samples)  were
   chosen  based on their  proximity to locations that exhibited high C
   interval  lead  concentrations, and two (four samples)  were chosen as
   background  locations.  The sample locations for each  of these
   categories  are as  follows:

        o   Locations  with High Lead Concentration in C Interval
FSG23
FS651
FSG53
FSG64
FSG65
FSG66
o Locations
Concentrat
FSG54
FSG56
FSG67
FSG71
FSG76
FSG77
FSG86
FSG87
FSG91
proximate
ion in C
FSG75
FSG78
FSG85
FSG95
FSG96
FSG97
FSB02
FSB03
FSB04
to locations with High Lead
Interval
FSG88


       o  Background Locations

          FSG15         FSG34

       The 54 D and E samples were analyzed in January 1986.   The
  results of these analyses are included in Table C-l  (Appendix  C)  and,
  together with the results of the previously conducted analyses of the
  FSA D and E interval  samples, are discussed below.
       Figures 3-9 and  3-10 show the lead concentrations measured in the
  0 and E interval samples, respectively.   Comparison  of Figure  3-9 with
  the corresponding C interval data of Figure 3-7 indicates  that, in
  general,  lead concentrations are substantially lower in the D  inter-
  val.   Only two samples (FSG640 and FSB04D)  exhibit  increased lead
  concentrations in the D interval  (from 230  to 1,110  mg/kg  and  128 to

                                 3-19
re-:vc:ed oaoer                                              ..

-------
                    FSG  IF9B1  FSG  FSG
                    68*  lf>»l  •?•  «•
                     12
                            FSA
   01*
                                        NOTE: Ooubto numtMn
                                        indfem • duplten* nrnpt*
                                        w« Uk«n.
            SO  100
                    200
                           SCALE
                          300   400
                                     500
                                           600 FEET
           0 10
                  40
                          •0
                                 130
                                         160 METERS
Figure 3-9  LEAD CONCENTRATIONS (mg/kg) IN D INTERVAL
           (5.0 TO 7.5 FEET) SAMPLES OF ON-SITE SOIL
           BORINGS
                         3-20

-------
   FSS
   01*
                                        NOTE: OoubtenufnMn
                                        indicat* • duplicate Mmpta
                                        «»• taken.
            90  100
                    200
                            SCALE
                          300    400
                                      500
                                            600 FEET
           0 10
                   40
                                  120
                                         160 METERS
Figure 3-10 LEAD CONCENTRATIONS (mg/kg) IN E INTERVAL
           (7.5-10.0 Feet) SAMPLES OF ON-SITE SOIL
           BORINGS
                          3-21

-------
278 mg/kg, respectively).   However,  many  of  the D  interval samples
continue to show relatively high  lead  concentration at  locations where
C interval concentrations  were high  (in particular, the 16,200 mg/kg
level detected in FSG86D).
     The changes in lead concentrations between the D  and E  intervals
are not as well-defined as  those  between  the C and D intervals, al-
though the overall trend is toward  substantially lower  concentrations
in the E interval samples.   Several  samples  still exhibit lead concen-
trations greater than 500  mg/kg,  and FSA06E  is the only E interval
sample to exhibit a substantial  increase  in  lead concentration rela-
tive to the D interval value (from  330 to 928 mg/kg).
     In general, antimony  concentrations  decrease  in parallel with the
lead concentrations (Figures 3-11 and  3-12).  In contrast, the 4.82
mg/kg cadmium detected in  FSA13D  was the  highest concentration found
in any soil sample analyzed for this metal.

3.2.5  Northwest Landfill  Characterization
     There were several borings conducted in and around the  northwest
landfill (Figure 3-13).  FSL01 and  FSL02  were conducted as 15-foot
exploratory borings, where a sample was collected  at mid-depth of the
battery chip fill and analyzed for  pH, lead, cadmium,  antimony, and
percent moisture.  FSL01 had 2 feet of fill  which  consisted  primarily
of whole battery casings mixed with sandy clay.  The remaining 13 feet
of the borehole was a brown-gray sandy clay. A composite sample of 0
to 2 feet had 3,020 mg/kg  lead, in  the primary sample,  and 9,670 mg/kg
lead in the duplicate sample.  FSL02 was  found to  have 6.5 feet of
battery casings and sandy clay fill.  The remaining 8.5 feet of the
borehole was a brown-gray sandy clay.   A  sample collected from 2 to 4
feet indicated 27,500 mg/kg lead.
     Because FSL01 had only 2 feet  of  battery chip fill  (less than
expected), a third exploratory hole (FSL03)  was bored  to  10  feet on
the western edge of the landfill.  Five feet of battery chip fill  was
encountered, underlain by 5 feet of gray sandy  clay.   No  samples were
collected.
     Five 10-foot grid borings are situated within the limits of  the
landfilled area  along the southern and eastern  edges.   As shown  in
Figure 3-13, these boreholes had battery casings  and chips  mixed  with
                                   3-22

-------
    4.3
zS
P§
       01  02  O3  O4  O3  O6  O7  06  O9   1O   11   12   12   13

                    FSA SAMPLES FROM NORTH TO SOUTH
     SO
Q.
o.
     70 -


     BO -


     50 -


     4O -


     30 -


     2O -


     10-
      O -o
       01  02  03  04  03  06  07   08   09   1O  11

                    FSA SAMPLES FROM NORTH TO SOUTH
                                                    12  12  13
      Figure 3-11   LEAD VERSUS ANTIMONY IN THE D INTERVAL (5.0
                  to 7.5 foot depth) FSA SAMPLES ALONG THE WEST
                  BANK OF THE WEST SWAMP
                                 3-23

-------
     1.2
           02
03  O4  03  05  07   08   09   1O  11   12
  FSA SAMPLE NUMBERS FROM NORTH TO SOUTH
                                                         13   13
    0.7
I
    O.8 -
    0.3 -
    O.4 -
    0.3 -
    0.2 -
    0.1 -
      O-o
       O1  02  03  O4   03   06  07  Ofl  09  1O  11   12   13   13
                 FSA SAMPLE NUMBER FROM NORTH TO SOUTH
      Figure 3-12  LEAD VERSUS ANTIMONY IN THE E INTERVAL (7.5
                  to 10.0 foot depth) FSA SAMPLES ALONG THE WEST
                  BANK OF THE WEST SWAMP
                                  3-24

-------
                       APPROXIMATE LOCATION
                      OF EXCAVATED FISH POND
                        SHOWN ON MARCH 1971
                           AERIAL PHOTO
                                                 KNOWN LIMIT
                                                 OF LANDFILL
             APPROXIMATE SOUTHERN EXTENT OF LANDFILL


                             FSG62

                            NO CHIPS
                 28   50
                                SCALE
                               100
                                                 200F6ET
                0  3  10
                                  30
                                              30 METERS
     Figure 3-13 DEPTH OF BATTERY CASING FILL IN NORTHWEST
                LANDFILL AREA
                                 3-25
ed
                                                         mill rti* ifitMlMt IK

-------
sandy clay to depths ranging  from  1  to 6.5 feet.  During the installa-
tion of monitoring well  MW09B, drilling  logs recorded that battery
chips occurred in fill  material  to a depth of approximately 10 feet.
     Borings conducted  within the  limits of the landfill indicate that
battery chip fill varies from 1  to at least 10 feet  in thickness.
However, the landfill was preceded by a  fish pond excavated around
1970/1971 to an unknown depth and  extending across most of the cur-
rently filled area (Figure 3-13).
     To what maximum depth battery casing and/or contaminated fill
material was placed into this pond site  is not known.  It is possible
that battery casing fill extends beyond  10 feet at one or more loca-
tions.
     In all, 14 samples were  collected  (as well as three duplicate
samples) from seven locations on the northwest landfill.  Lead levels
for these 14 samples ranged from 690 mg/kg (FSG43 at the B and C
intervals) to 84,200 mg/kg (FSG51  at the B interval).  An average con-
centration for the lead-contaminated soils of the landfill, based on
analysis of FSL01 and FSL02,  is  16,922 mg/kg  lead.   When considering
the additional 12 samples collected in  the filled area, the mean  lead
concentration in the samples  is  13,911 mg/kg, with a standard devia-
tion of 21,883 mg/kg.

3.2.6  Soils Investigation Summary
     In summary, gross lead contamination of  the  surface soils  (0 to
0.5 foot) is generally restricted  to the western  half of the  Sapp Bat-
tery site (Figures 3-2 and 3-3).  In contrast,  gross lead contamina-
tion of soils between 0.5 and 10 feet  below  land  surface is,  for  the
most part,  restricted to four areas (Figures  3-5, 3-7,  3-9,  and  3-10):
the Northwest Landfill; northeast of the plant  foundation; between  the
West Swamp  and the plastic liner;  and  south  of  the West  Swamp and
plastic liner.  The high lead concentrations  in  the  first three  of
these  areas  appears to be correlated with the greater thicknesses of
battery chip fill  (Figure 3-1),  whereas lead  contamination  in the
southernmost  area  is probably a result of its being  located  in a
former  surface drainage path (see Section 1.3).
     Although  lead concentrations generally decrease with depth
down to 10  feet, there  are many exceptions to this  trend.   This
                                  3-?6

-------
 inconsistency presumably  reflects the combined influences of variabil-
 ity .in source distribution together with variability in soil infiltra-
 tion and cation  exchange  capacities.  In particular, the usually sub-
 stantial  decrease  in  lead concentrations from the C interval to the D
 and E intervals  (Figures  3-7, 3-9, and 3-10) presumably reflects the
 reduced permeability  characteristics of the increasingly clayey soils.
 Nevertheless,  the  possibilities of lead contamination of deeper (i.e.,
 below 10 feet) soils  cannot be ruled out due to:   (1) the continued
 occurrence  of high  lead concentrations at the D and E interval depths,
 (2)  the less  well-defined pattern of change for lead concentration
 between the D and  E intervals, (3) the great lateral and vertical
 variability in soil lithology, and (4) the general association of
 groundwater contamination in all three on-site aquifer systems with
 areas  of  elevated shallow (0 to 10 feet) soil contamination (see Sec-
 tion 3.4).  However,  the  overall trend toward reduced lead concentra-
 tions  with  depth over areas of reduced size does suggest that deeper
 soil  contamination might  only have a minimal long-term adverse envi-
 ronmental impact if not included as part of the final clean-up pro-
 gram.
      Overall, cadmium concentrations are lower and occur somewhat more
 sporadically than antimony concentrations.   In contrast, changes in
 antimony  concentration more closely parallel changes in lead concen-
 tration,  both within  a single interval as well as between intervals
 (see  Figures 3-4, 3-6, and 3-8).  It is probable that a remedial pro-
 gram designed to clean up the lead-contaminated soils would effec-
 tively  reduce any adverse environmental impacts associated with
 cadmium and antimony soil contamination.

 3.2.7   Fixation Study
     The  results of the chemical fixation analysis for the lead
 extracts  are presented in Table 3-1.   As is illustrated in this table,
 the cementitious mixture was much more effective in binding lead than
the pozzolanic cement.
     The  cementitious mixture (Portland-Type 4) exhibited excellent
binding capacity for all samples (1126A, B, C).  This is represented
                                  3-27
                                                    ,., ,,1,,..	i,,„„-.,„,„

-------
                                           Table 3-1
                            RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF EXTRACTS
                                 FROM EP TOXICITY TESTS (mg/1)
                                                Samples
                                                             Maximum
                                                            Allowable
                                                          Concentration
Pozzolanic
E 4 E Lab Number 86-
11260
1126E
1126F
Sample Identity

Lead
Ash: Lime:
Soil
0.25:0.25:1
76.4
Ash: Lime:
Soil
0.5:0.5:1
<0.06
Ash: Lime: Blank
Soil
0.75:0.75:1
7.17 <0.06


5.0
Cementitioua
E & E Lab Number 86-
Sample Identity


Lead
1126A
Concrete:
Soil
0.5:1
0.085
11268
Concrete:
Soil
1:1
<0.06
1126C
Concrete:
Soil
1.5:1
<0.06
5.0
•86-1126 is a composite of FSG-53 A,  B,  C;  FSC-76 A,  8,  C;  FSG-87 A,  8,  C.  The composite has a
 lead concentration of 71,000 mo/kg.   The EP Toxicity test  on the control sample (untreated
 composite soil material) yielded 59.4 mg/1.
                                           3-23

-------
by the  extremely low recoverable lead values for each sample.  As
compared to  the  maximum  allowable concentration of 5.0 mg/L, all three
samples were near  or below detection limits.  Only 1126A exhibited a
slight  lead  recovery of  0.085  mg/L.   The concentrations of 1126B and C
were below the detection limit of 0.06 mg/L.
     Lead recovery from  samples from the pozzolanic mixture showed an
order of magnitude difference  between 1126E (<0.06 mg/L), 1126D (76.4
mg/L) and 1126F  (7.17 mg/L).
     These results demonstrate that  Portland- type IV cement and a 1:1
mixture of soils to  pozzolan will  solidify the soils and reduce the
concentration of lead  in the leachate to acceptable levels.  It is
expected that cement  requirements will be reduced and control of
contaminants  increased with process  optimization.
                                 3-29
     CdDfi'                                              nnlii^ mill .•Mviri.cutii in

-------
3.3  SEDIMENTS
     The analytical results generated by the sediment  sampling  con-
ducted in November/December are presented in Table  C-2 in  Appendix C.
The following discussion on the occurrence and distribution  of  lead,
cadmium, and antimony in swamp and creek sediments  within  the study
area is keyed to five geographical areas in order to more  clearly
address the trends occurring in each.   These five areas  are:  (1) the
Northwest Swamp, (2) the West Swamp,  (3) the East Swamp, (4) the
Southeast Swamp, and (5) Steele City  Bay/Little Dry Creek  wetland
system.
     Sediment borings were conducted  to depths of 2.5  feet (FMT bor-
ings), 5 feet (FMH borings), and 10 feet (FMK borings).  The sampling
intervals were at depths identical to those for the soil borings:
interval A (0 to 0.5 foot), interval  B (0.5 to 2.5  feet),  interval C
(2.5 to 5 feet), interval D (5 to 7.5  feet), and interval  E  (7.5 to
10 feet).

3.3.1  Northwest Swamp
     In the Northwest Swamp, five 2.5-foot borings  were  conducted
(FMT01 through FMT05; Figures 2-4 and  3-14).   The A interval samples
at all locations showed elevated lead levels ranging from  111 to 593
mg/kg.  This would indicate that the  swamp has been affected by the
Northwest Landfill as well as by surface runoff from the area north-
west of the plant foundation, which discharges to the  swamp  south of
FMT05.  Lead levels decrease greatly  in the B interval  at  all loca-
tions, ranging from 25 mg/kg in FMT05B to 70 mg/kg  in  FMT04B.   This
decrease most likely reflects the uptake of lead by the  organic-rich
sediments that overlie the shallow tight clays encountered within the
A interval.
     A trace of cadmium (0.66 mg/kg)  was detected in FMT03A, whereas
traces of antimony were detected in both FMT03A and FMT05A (0.66 and
0.55 mg/kg, respectively).  At each of the five locations, pH
decreases with depth.

3.3.2  West Swamp
     In the West Swamp, five 10-foot  borings were conducted  (FMC01
through 05; Figures 2-4 and 3-14). The upper A, B, and  C  interval
samples were analyzed for pH, lead, cadmium, antimony, and percent

                                3-30

-------
                          About 160 It.
                             lo NE
FORMER SAW
 RESIDENCE
                                                                                    LEGEND 	

                                                                                  10 Foot Boring
                                                                                  (FMK)

                                                                                  6 Foot  Boring
                                                                                  (HMHl

                                                                                  2 5 Foot Baring
                                                                                  (FMT)

                                                                                  0 to 0.6-Foot Depth
                                                                                  Sample

                                                                                  05 to 2.5-Fool Depth
                                                                                  Sample

                                                                                  2.5 to 5.0- Foot Depth
                                                                                  Sample

                                                                                  Duplicate Samples
                O 60
                          2OO
                                     SCALE
                                    4 DO
                                              600
                                                       800 FEET
                    0 10.
                                    10O
                                           160
                                                    200 METERS
    Figure 3-14   LEAD CONCENTRATIONS (mg/kg) IN ON  SITE A. B. AND
                  C INTERVAL SEDIMENT SAMPLES

-------
moisture.   The lower (D and  E)  interval samples were archived pending
the analytical results  for the  upper samples.
     In the upper 6 inches (A  interval),  lead levels were found to be
quite high in FM<01A and FMK04A only (10,900 and 1,270 mg/kg, respec-
tively).  This suggests that high  lead  levels in surface sediments are
somewhat unevenly distributed throughout  the West Swamp; however, the
southernmost portion of the  swamp  is most highly contaminated.  In the
southernmost sample (FMK01A), where the highest lead level occurs, a
cadmium concentration of 1.15 mg/kg and an  antimony concentration of
36.2 mg/kg were detected.
     In the B intervals of FMC01 through  05, it becomes even more
apparent that lead has  been  concentrated  in the southern end of the
West Swamp.  Lead increases  in.FPK01B to  12,500 mg/kg and in FNK02B to
1,280 mg/kg, whereas FMK03B  exhibits a  slight decrease, and FMK04B and
FMK05B show a drastic decrease  with depth (Figure 3-14).  Cadmium
increases slightly in FMC01B and antimony increases in both FMK01B and
FNK02B.
     The C interval in borings  FM<01 and  FMK02 shows a substantial
decrease in lead contamination. This suggests that lead contamination
must sharply decrease at some  point within  the overlying B  interval.
     It should be noted that although FMK03 does not show excessive
lead contamination in the A, B, and C intervals (115, 82, and 60
mg/kg, respectively), it does  exhibit the smallest decrease  in  lead
concentration with depth.  This boring  was  conducted in the  deepest
depression in the swamp, and tighter clay materials were not encoun-
tered above approximately 5  feet (i.e., the clay was much deeper  than
in the other four borings).  Consequently,  either the more  permeable
nature of the overlying sandy  materials has allowed lead contamination
to migrate into the deeper horizons, or the reduced cohesiveness  of
this material increases the  tendency for  mixing to occur during auger-
ing, affecting the representativeness of  the sample.
     Cadmium  and antimony were not detected in  any of the C interval
samples in the West Swamp.
     Almost all of the 15 samples  from  the  West  Swamp which were
analyzed exhibited pH values of 4.0 to  5.5. The  exceptions were the
most highly lead-contaminated   samples  (FMC01A  and 01B),  which had pH
values of 7.05 and 6.00, respectively.   Analogous to  the  situation
                                  3-32

-------
with the shallow soil samples along the southwest bank  of  the  West
Swamp-, these higher pH values could be a result of acid-neutralization
by  a lime trench that was constructed on the west bank  by  EPA  in  1979
as  an emergency remedial effort.
     Based on the upper interval results, analysis of the  archived  D
and E interval samples from the West Swamp was not deemed  necessary.

3.3.3  East Swamp
     Eight 5-foot borings were conducted throughout the East Swamp
(FMH01-08; Figures 2-4 and 3-14).  The A and B interval  samples were
analyzed for pH, lead, cadmium, antimony, and percent moisture; the C
interval sample was archived pending the analytical results  for the
upper intervals.
     In the upper 6 inches (A interval), only sample FMH01A  exhibited
a very high lead concentration (1,860 mg/kg); the other seven  A  inter-
val samples ranged from 17 to 251 mg/kg lead.  The West Swamp  drains
into the East Swamp, and therefore, lead-contaminated sediments have
in the past been carried into the East Swamp and primarily deposited
at the mouth of the canal discharge (i.e., in the vicinity of  FMH01).
The lead levels that occur in the other seven A interval samples  do
not indicate any lateral pattern of dispersion and seem to occur  some-
what sporadically (Figure 3-14).
     Cadmium occurs above detection limits in six of the eight A  in-
terval  samples and, like antimony, does not exhibit a lateral  disper-
sion pattern.  The highest cadmium and antimony levels occur in FMH06A
(3.74 mg/kg and 48.1 mg/kg, respectively) in the extreme northeastern
portion of the swamp.
     The B interval samples generally indicate the same trend  of
decreasing lead values as seen in the Northwest and West swamps.   Only
FMH048 Indicated an increase in lead concentration with depth  (up to
20 mg/kg).
     In general, cadmium concentrations are lower  in the B interval
samples.  However, cadmium levels in FMH01B and FMH06B (1.21 and 2.85
mg/kg,  respectively) decrease only slightly in contrast to the sharp
decreases in lead.  Antimony levels decrease sharply from the A to B
intervals in all cases.
                                 3-33
'"CVC ed CdOC'                                            i-c.il.it> mill

-------
     With the exception of FMH01 and FMH06,  the East  Swamp  samples
showed little change in pH with depth.   The  pH  values  slightly
increased or slightly decreased with depth  in  six  of  the  borings,
ranging from 3.34 to 3.72 in the B interval  samples.   However,  in
FMH01 and FMH06, pH decreased sharply with  depth (from 4.79 to  3.07
and from 3.71 to 2.79, respectively).   The FMH01 and  FMH06  samples
also exhibited the highest lead levels  and  sharpest decrease  in lead
concentration with depth.
     Based on the A and 8 interval trends in the East  Swamp,  it was
decided not to analyze the C interval  archived  samples.

3.3.4  Southeast Swamp
     Three 5-foot borings were conducted in  the Southeast Swamp
(FMH09, 10, and 11; Figures 2-4 and 3-14).   The A  and  B interval sam-
ples were analyzed for pH, lead,  cadmium, antimony, and percent mois-
ture; the C interval  sample was archived pending the  analytical
results for the upper intervals.
     Station FMH11, located in the extreme southeast  corner of  the
swamp, adjacent to the culvert crossing under County  Road 280 into
Steele City Bay, was  the only boring conducted  in  open water.   Borings
FMH09 and FMH10 were  conducted in two of the unsubmerged northern
reaches of this swamp.
     Sample FMH11A showed the highest  lead and  antimony levels  (186
and 14 mg/kg, respectively), as well  as the  only occurrence of  cadmium
(1.93 mg/kg) above detection limits.   Lead levels  decreased substan-
tially in the B interval  in all samples (Figure 3-14), and  neither
antimony nor cadmium  was detected.
     In FMH11, pH dropped from 4.35 in  the A interval  to  3.39 in the B
interval.  The other  two borings  showed no change  of  pH with depth.
     Based on the A and B interval trends for the  metals  in question,
none of the C interval samples were analyzed for the  Southeast  Swamp.

3.3.5  Steele City Bay
     As discussed in  Section 2.3  and illustrated in Figures 2-5 and
3-15, three 10-foot borings were  conducted  in  Steele  City Bay (FMK06,
07, and 09), four 5-foot borings  were conducted in Steele City  Bay
(FMH12 through 15), and seven 2.5-foot  borings  were conducted in wet-
lands from U.S. Highway 231 to Little Dry Creek (FMT07 through  13).
                                 3-34

-------
a
o
    I
    u>
    tn
                                                                                                                 A


                                                                                                                 B


                                                                                                                 C
      LEGEND


10-Foot boring (FMK|


6-Fool boring (FMH)


2.6-Foot boring (FMT)


0 to o B foot depth compodl*


O 6 to 2 6 foot depth compoilt*


26 to B 0 loot depth compotlt*
(FMK boclnatonly)
                                                                                                                ( )  Duplicate umplai
                                                                             SCALE
                                                       O 100 600
                                                                    I OOP
                                                                                   2OOO
                                                                                                 3000 FEET
                                                          O   100^200  300  400   6OO  6OO  >OO  BOO MEETEHS



                                   Figure 3-15   LEAD CONCENTRATIONS (mg/kg) IN OFF SITE A. B. AND C INTERVAL

                                                 SEDIMENT SAMPLES

-------
One 10-foot boring  (FNK08) was conducted at the entrance to the cul-
vert under County Road  280, just north of the road.  All samples were
analyzed for the selected metals, except for the samples from the D
and E intervals  of  the  10-foot borings and the C interval of the
5-foot borings,  pending review of the results of the upper intervals.
     In general, the  trend of lead concentration decreasing with depth
that was seen for the on-site swamps was also seen throughout the off-
site wetlands system.   This was most dramatic in boring FMK08, situ-
ated in the former  drainage path from the site to Steele City Bay.
Here, a lead concentration of 34,700 mg/kg was detected in the A
interval, decreasing  to 953 mg/kg in the B interval and to 110 mg/kg
in the C interval.  The same trend occurs in FMK07 (40 feet southeast
of the culvert), where  lead decreases from 6,660 mg/kg  (6,410 mg/kg  in
the duplicate sample) in the A interval to 31.4 mg/kg and 2.57 mg/kg
in the B and C intervals, respectively.   Cadmium  and antimony concen-
trations similarly  decrease with depth.  Vertical trends are, for the
most part, consistent,  and  lateral dispersion of lead contamination
can be seen to extend as far as the FMT09A sediments.   However,  in the
area south of the culvert crossing to FMT11, lateral migration becomes
somewhat more difficult to  determine.  Sample FMT10A, collected  in the
small wetland area adjacent to the road connecting County Road R276
and Williams Road,  yielded  212 mg/kg  lead.   It  is  possible that  this
location has been affected  by the drainage it receives  from the
adjacent road and a nearby  automobile salvage operation  directly to
the north.  In addition, FMT12A  and FMT12B (upstream sample location
in Little Dry Creek,  100 feet downstream from the  County Road 276
bridge)  showed  lead values  of  10 and  57 mg/kg,  respectively,  which  are
higher than the lead concentrations  in the A and B intervals  of  FMT13
(downstream from the confluence with  the Steele City Bay surface
drainage).  The lead detected  in the  FMT12 samples suggests the  possi-
bility that runoff from County Road 276, or  some other source north of
the  bridge,  is  contributing lead to the  drainage system.   Conse-
quently,  the  lead contamination in  FMT10A,  as  well as  the  upstream
contamination in FMT12A and B,  raise the possibility that  the lead
detected 1n  FMT13A and  B may not be entirely attributable  to transport
from the Sapp Battery site via the Steele  City Bay wetlands system.
                                 3-36

-------
      It should be noted that in some cases (particularly in Steele
City  Bay) lead values were considerably higher than those in sediment
samples collected in the same general areas by FDER in 1983.  It is
possible that this is due to the fact that the FDER samples were col-
lected from the upper inch of sediment only, whereas the E & E sedi-
ment  samples were collected from the"upper 6 inches.  Given that the
major contamination stress of the Steel City Bay swamps occurred over
such  a relatively short period of time, organic detritus accumulations
may have been so rapid that some of the more contaminated sediments
are several inches below the surface.  The lower portion of the 6-inch
core may contain lead values that better reflect this earlier period
in the swamp's history.
     Based on the fairly well-defined trends of decreasing lead,
cadmium, and antimony concentrations with depth in all of the Swamp
sediments, it was not recommended that any of the archived C, D, and E
interval samples be analyzed.
                                  3-37
     paper                                            ,-, ,,!.,.:> ,,<«t

-------
3.4  GROUNDWATER
3.4.1  Hydrologic  Analysis
     All wells installed  for  this  study complement the existing moni-
toring system constructed during the FDER-RI.  Hence, the monitoring
wells fall into three depth categories: (1) the C level wells, with
depth ranges of 5  to 20 feet, to observe the surficial aquifer system;
(2) the B level wells, with depths ranging from 35 to 100 feet, to
observe the intermediate  aquifer system; and (3) the A level wells,
with depths ranging from  110  to 190 feet, to observe the Floridan
aquifer system. Although a few wells  are classified A wells, the
lithology in which the screen was  set  reflected B level stratigraphy.
This is the case for MW-09A,  MW-12A, and MW-13A.
     Water levels  were measured and recorded for all 44 monitoring
wells at the Sapp  Battery site on  December 11, 1985.  Tables D-l
through D-3 in Appendix D present  these data in feet above mean sea
level (MSL).  From the listed data, potentiometric maps were
constructed for each aquifer  system.

3.4.1.1  Aquifer Potentiometric Surfaces
     The water levels for the surficial aquifer system at the  site
exhibit a horizontal gradient of  less  than IX to the southeast  (Figure
3-16).  The water table  elevation  ranges from 136 feet above MSL  in
the northwest portion of  the  site  to 127 feet MSL in the southeast
portion.  The gradient increases  west  of the West Swamp and  levels off
to the east.  A groundwater trough dipping southward appears to occur
in the area of well MW-16C.   This  trough most likely  is a result  of
the one-time connection  between the West Swamp  and  Steele City Bay,
before County Road 280 was  constructed.   In  addition,  as shown on the
map, both the West Swamp and  East  Swamp  areas have  a direct  influence
on the surficial  aquifer system,  inasmuch  as the water table gradient
levels off to the east.
     The major potentiometric surface  within the  intermediate  aquifer
system  slopes to the south-southwest  in  the  western portion  of the
site;  in the  eastern half of the site  it  slopes to  the west  (see
Figure 3-17).  Horizontal gradients are,  on  the average,  about 1% in
both cases.   Water  level elevations range from about 136  feet MSL in
the north  and  east to 122 feet MSL in  the southwest.   Figure 3-17
                                  3-38

-------
a
o
    CO
    I
    CO
    UD
                             Control Period D«t» DwwntMr 1986
                                                 Q SO
                                                         200
                                                                  SCALE
                                                                 4OO      6OO
                                                                                  800 FEET
                                                    O10     BO
                                                                 1OO
                                                                        150
                                                                               2OO METERS
                                     Figure 3-16  GENERALIZED POTENTIOMETRIC MAP OF THE SURFICIAL
                                                AQUIFER SYSTEM  (FEET ABOVE MEAN SEA LEVEL)

-------
i
->
o
                                        0 50
                                               200
                                                       SCALE

                                                       4OO
                                                               6OO
                                                                      800 FEET
                                           01O   SO
                                                       1OO
                                                             ISO
                                                                   2OO METERS
                            Figure 3-17  GENERALIZED POTENTIOMETRIC MAP OF THE INTERMEDIATE

                                      AQUIFER SYSTEM (FEET ABOVE MEAN SEA LEVEL)

-------
 indicates the presence  of  a  southwest-trending groundwater trough that
 extends across the  eastern half of the site.  This feature appears to
 be the result of a  buried  paleo-stream channel that meanders south-
 westerly through the  intermediate sediments.  Water levels in five
 wells (MW-01B, -03B8, -07B,  -12B, and -228) open to the intermediate
 aquifer system do not correlate with the major potentiometric surface.
 Three of these wells  (MW-01B, -07B, and -22B) may represent an addi-
 tional  semi-confined  aquifer within the intermediate system, possibly
 lying within  the Suwannee  or Marianna limestone.  The remaining two
 wells (MW-03BB and  MU-12B) have water levels that suggest a third
 minor zone within the intermediate aquifer system.
      The Floridan aquifer  system in this area exhibits a general
 easterly flow direction, toward the Chipola River (Figure 3-18).  The
 horizontal  hydraulic gradient is very gentle (less than 0.01X), with  a
 water level of 101  feet MSL  in the west and 99 feet MSI in the east.
 This  study confirmed the conclusion of the FDER-RI (Watts 1984) that
 several  sinkholes breach the Floridan aquifer system at the site.
 Based on  the  monitoring well borehole logs, this breaching is limited
 to  the  area west  of the West Swamp, with evident penetration at the
 MW-09 and  MW-12  locations, in addition to those identified in the
 FDER-RI  at  the MW-03 and MW-13 locations.

 3.4.1.2  Aquifer  Physical Test Results
      As mentioned in Section 2.4, limited slug and specific capacity
 tests were conducted on 13 wells at the site (see Table 0-4 in Appen-
 dix 0).  Raw  field data from these tests were used to calculate trans-
 missivity  (T), hydraulic conductivity (K), seepage velocity (V), spe-
 cific capacity (Cs), and well yield (Wy) values.
      The method used to calculate K and T values from the slug test
 data  is based  on  a technique for determining these parameters from
 partially penetrating wells in unconfined and confined aquifers
 (Bouwer and Rice  1976).   For this procedure, semi logarithmic graphs
 are prepared  for decreasing water level versus Increasing time.
 Values from the straight line portion of the graph (or the immediate
response) are used for obtaining K and T from two equations derived by
 Bouwer and Rice (1976).   The calculated values for each slug test are
given in Table 0-4 in Appendix D.   It should be understood that
                                 3-41

-------
t\>
                                        FOHMEHSAPP
                                        RESIDENCE
                        Conttol Period Date: December 1985
                                            0 50
                                                    2OO
 SCALE
400	    600
                                                                             800FCCT
                                               O10	50
                                                            100
                                                                   tiiO	20O MCTCH3
                               Figure 3-18  GENERALIZED POTENTIOMETRIC MAP OF THE FLORIDAN
                                           AQUIFER SYSTEM  (FEET ABOVE MEAN SEA LEVEL)

-------
 because the  slug  test procedure evaluates only an area of the aquifer
 within  a short radial distance of the well, values will  not  necessar-
 ily be  representative of the aquifer system as a whole or of its
 heterogeneity.  In addition, this procedure assumes that: flow above
 the water table can be ignored; head losses as water enters  the well
 are negligible (i.e., the well screen does not impede water  movement);
 and the aquifer is homogeneous and isotropic.
      The T values shown in Table D-4 in Appendix D are very  low for
 all of  the B and  C level wells and for MW-12A; for wells MW-06A and
 MW-22A,  the T values are high.  Data for B and C level wells and  for
 MW-12A  are consistent with predicted values, due to the sandy clay/
 clayey  sand deposits at the screened intervals in these wells.  As
 expected, the T values for wells MW-06A and MW-22A are much  greater
 than  those for the B and C level wells; however, these values are an
 order of magnitude lower than the pump test T value given in the
 FDER-RI  (53,836 gpd/ft).   This difference most likely results from the
 much  shorter radial distance of investigation for the slug test tech-
 nique,  in that it does not reflect the effect of enhanced flow paths
 associated with the zones of secondary permeability known to occur  in
 the Floridan aquifer system.  Thus, the pump test data are far more
 accurate  than the slug test results.
      In  general,  the K values range from 10~3 to 10~6 centi-
meters per second (cm/sec).  These values are consistent with the
 ranges defined by Freeze and Cherry (1979) for the respective material
type  and with the calculated values for the designated core  sample  in
 the FDER-RI.  Similar to the T values, the K values for MW-06A and 22A
 are slightly lower than the FDER RI pump test value of 5 x 10-3
cm/sec.   This difference is probably due to the limitations  of the
 slug  test technique.   However, the T and K values in the slug- tested
wells reflect the values that were expected based on observed pumpage
 and lithologic characteristics.
     Horizontal groundwater seepage velocities were calculated from
the previously determined K values using estimated effective porosi-
ties.  This procedure involves using the equation V » Kl/n,  as
described by Fetter (1980), where:

     K a hydraulic conductivity,
     I = hydraulic gradient, and
     n = effective porosity.
                                3-43

-------
The calculated V values listed in Table D-4 in Appendix  D  indicate
very slow movement of groundwater in all  three aquifer systems.  How-
ever, the V values for even the more transmissive A  level  wells  (MW-06
and MW-22) may still represent an underestimation of  actual flow velo-
cities as a result of the limitations of the slug test technique in
relation to the existence of enhanced flow  paths,  as  discussed above.
     The raw specific capacity (Cs)  data generated in the  field  were
evaluated in accordance with the method given  by  Freeze  and Cherry
(1979).  The calculated values are shown in Table D-4 in Appendix D.
From these data, theoretical well  yields  were  determined by dividing
the Cs value by a footage value at which the aquifer  would effectively
be pumped.  In all cases,  this depth was  considered to be  at the well
bottom.  Most of the B and C level wells  and wells MW-09A, MW-12A, and
MW-13A will  have yields similar to that of  well MW-14C.
     Wells MW-02B and MW-06B show yields  greater  than the  rest of the
B level wells (except for MW-03BB) because  they are located in the
apparent gravelly paleo-stream channel  of the  intermediate aquifer
system.  It  is believed that well  MW-03BB would produce  similar
yields, based on observations made during purging.  The  well yield
difference between MW-02B and MW-06B reflects  the fact that MW-02B has
a higher percentage of the very rounded milky  white quartz gravel
found in the eastern deposits.
     As expected,- the yield illustrated for well  MW-14A  is substan-
tially greater than the B and C level well  yield  values.   Except for
wells MW-09A, MW-12A, and MW-13A*. the  other wells in the  A network
will exhibit yields similar to that  of  MW-14A,  and a  few will exhibit
substantially greater yields.  For instance, during development  of
wells MW-06A, MW-21A, and MW-22A,  it was  estimated that  these wells
would likely produce in excess of 500 gallons  per minute (gpm).

3.4.2  Chemical  Analysis
3.4.2.1  Aquifer Field Parameters
     Tables  D-5 through D-8 in Appendix 0 present the pH,  conductiv-
ity, and temperature values measured in the field for all  monitoring
*Based on the water levels  measured in  these wells  (Table  D-3  in
 Appendix D) as well  as  on  the hydrogeologic parameters calculated for
 well MW12-A (Table D-4  in  Appendix D)  monitoring wells MW-09A,
 MW-12A, and MW-13A will henceforth be  considered open to  the  inter-
 mediate aquifer system.

                               3-44

-------
 and  residential wells sampled during the current investigation  as  well
 as during the 1983 FDER sampling.  In addition,  Tables  D-12B  and D-12C
 list these parameters for samples collected from the residential wells
 by ESE, Inc., in April 1984 and January 1985.
     Examination of these data reveals several  trends and anomalies.
 First, groundwater from the residential Floridan aquifer system wells
 surrounding the site exhibits the most uniformly alkaline pH  values  as
 well as consistently low conductivities (Tables  0-8, D-12B,  and
 D-12C), reflecting the fact that these wells have not been as severely
 affected by contamination from the Sapp Battery operation.   In  con-
 trast, the pH of groundwater from the on-site Floridan  aquifer  system
 wells (Table D-7) has generally decreased from the reported 1983 FDER
 monitoring well values, which agrees with the generally increased
 level of contamination indicated by the corresponding metals  data.
     For the most part, the groundwater in the surficial and inter-
mediate aquifer systems (Tables D-5 and D-6) has exhibited a signifi-
 cant increase in pH from the reported 1983 values, reflecting the
 cessation of acid-generating operations and the subsequent remedial
 activities at the site.  This effect is most dramatically illustrated
 in the southeast corner of the site, where the pH of groundwater from
wells MW-18C, MW-19C, and MW-20C has increased from 3.0-3.5 to 5.0-
 5.8.   Wells that continue to produce groundwater of a somewhat  low pH
 (<5)  can be divided into two categories:  those which lie within or
downgradient of heavily contaminated areas (MW-03BB, MW-03C,  and
MW-16C);  and those which lie immediately downgradient from the acidic
water of the East Swamp (MW-15B and MW-21C).
     The conductivities measured in groundwater from the on-site wells
show significant variability within each aquifer system (Tables D-5
through D-7, Appendix D).  In general, the lower conductivity values
reflect the interaction of the groundwater with the aquifer matrix in
the proximity of recharge areas, whereas the higher conductivity
values reflect elevated metal concentrations.  However, there is no
 linear correspondence between metal concentration and conductivity
 (i.e.,  the highest conductivities do not occur in groundwater exhibit-
 ing the highest metal concentrations), as is readily apparent when the
                                  3-45
     caper                                            ,-,,,!<,••< .m,l rimr-mum-iii

-------
data .in Tables D-5 through D-7 are compared with the corresponding
metal concentrations in Tables D-8 through D-ll.   This deviation from
a linear correspondence is probably the  result of  a combination of two
factors:

     1.  The fact that the conductivities were obtained from unfil-
         tered and unacidified samples,  whereas the metal concentra-
         tions reflect analyses of unfiltered samples that had been
         preserved with concentrated nitric acid to a pH of approxi-
         mately 1 (i.e., adsorbed  or matrix metal  ions could have been
         leached from suspended sediments within the sample); or

     2.  The presence of anionic or cationic species (e.g., iron,
         magnesium, or sulfate) that were not included in the anal-
         yses.

     The first of the above two factors  will be considered in greater
detail later in this section.

3.4.2.2  Aquifer Lead Concentrations
     Figures 3-19 through 3-22 present the lead concentrations mea-
sured in groundwater from the  surficial  aquifer system, intermediate
aquifer system, and Floridan aquifer system (on-site and residential
wells), respectively, during the current investigation as well as dur-
ing the 1983 FDER sampling effort.  These results, as well as the
analytical  results for the other metals, are presented in Tables D-9
through 0-16 in Appendix D.
     Figures 3-19 through 3-22 illustrate that essentially all of the
on-site monitoring well samples exhibit  some degree of lead contamina-
tion, whereas only groundwater from residential wells east, east-
southeast,  and east-northeast  of the site currently exhibit lead con-
centrations above assumed background levels, as shown by MW-23C, 22C,
and 22B, and other upgradient  residential wells (<5 to 7 ppb; see
Figure 3-22).
     Lead values detected in residential wells over five sampling
episodes follow the east, east-southeast, and east-northeast trend
(See Table D-12D).  Residential wells GW-01, GW-03, GW-09, GW-10,
GW-12, GW-20 and GW-21 (See Figure 2-6)  usually show positive lead
                                 3-46

-------
                                                           .*. I-.--;:-•.•
        1
        12C vf      MW-1
        FORMER SAPP
         RESIDENCE
                                                                                    NOTE: November December
                                                                                    1985 ratulti are above Ilia lilt*
                                                                                    •nd May Ociobw 1983 rwulli
                                                                                    •ra below lh« line.

                                                                                    NOTE: Double numbeit
                                                                                    Indicate • duplicate umpto
                                                                                    was taken.
                         0  bO
                                  2OO
                                             SCALE
                                            400
                                                     600
800 FEET
                            O 1O
                                           100
                                                   160
                                                           20O METERS
Figure 3-19  LEAD CONCENTRATIONS (ppb) IN MONITORING WELLS OPEN TO THE SURFICIAL
             AQUIFER SYSTEM

-------
CO
I
4*
CO
                                                                                 l'^;.'-  i
                                                                                 •  *  * -  * i/<
                                                                                                     NOTE: Novambw December
                                                                                                     1985 results ere ebove the line
                                                                                                     end Mey-October 1983 results
                                                                                                     I ere below the line.

                                                                                                     NOTE: Double numbers
                                                                                                     indiceie e duplicele simple
                                                                                                     wes taken.
                                              0 SO
                                                      2OO
                                                                SCALE
                                                               400
                                                                        600
                                                                                 800 FEET
                                                 OIO
                                                        BO
                                                               100
                                                                      ISO
                                                                              200MtTER3
                       Figure 3-20 LEAD CONCENTRATIONS 
-------
a
0
                                          MM
                                FOAMEA 6AWT
                                 RCSIOEMCC
NOTE. Nov«mb«r Docember
1986 r*sult> «f« »bov« tha lin*
•ndM*y-October 1983r«tuli»
arc below th« tin*.

* R*umpl*d


NOTE: Doublo numtMtt
indtc*M • duplical* umpl*
WM ukan.
                                                       &O   200
                                                                       SCALE
                                                                      4OO
                                                                                600
                                                                                          BOO FEET
                                                      010
                                                              5O
                                                                      1OO
                                                                              16O
                                                                                      20OMCTERS
                           Figure 3-21 LEAD CONCENTRATIONS {ppb) IN WELLS OPEN TO THE FLOR1DAN AQUIFER
                                        SYSTEM

-------
NOTE:
rwuH»««ibo»«th«lin«

AufM 31 Ufunbtr 1.1983
NOTE: Doubt* nu
indicate • duplicm wnpta
MM taken.
                                                         QUAO»«NGU LOCATION
                                            1 OLOMCTfM
  Figure 3-22  LEAD CONCENTRATIONS (ppb) IN RESIDENTIAL WELLS
                                    3-50

-------
 values.   From 1983 to 1986 the lead values  are somewhat sporadic.   In
 many.cases,  lead was  detected  in  one sampling,  undetected  in  the next
 sampling,  and detected again in the third sampling  effort.   In  any
 case,  the  three-year  monitoring period  did  not  show any significant
 lead  increases with time  and the  majority of  residential well contami-
 nation is  below 20 ppb.
      The  highest lead concentrations within the surficial  aquifer sys-
 tem occur  across the  western half of the  site in  close  correspondence
 with  the  areas of maximum soil  contamination  (Figures  3-2,  3-3,  and
 3-5).   Similar to the increase  of pH discussed  earlier, groundwater
 from  the  surficial  wells  in the southeastern  quadrant  of the  site
 currently  exhibits  reduced lead concentrations  compared to  the  1983
 FDER  levels.   It is believed that soils  and groundwater in  this  area
 were  initially subject  to lead  contamination  as a result of the  area
 being  the  original  location of  the Sapp  Battery operation  and, more
 importantly,  overflow and infiltration  of contaminated  waters from the
 West Swamp.   As  a result  of the cessation of  site operations  and the
 subsequent remedial  activities, this primary  source of  contamination
 was eliminated  and  the  elevated lead concentrations diminished  by the
 flushing action  of  infiltrating rainwater.  As  will  be  discussed in
 the next section,  it  is probable  that the current levels of lead
 contamination  exhibited by groundwater  from these wells is  primarily
 controlled by  the direction of  flow within  the surficial aquifer sys-
tem.
     Analogously,  it  is assumed that the  decreases  in  lead  concentra-
tion on the western half  of the site (most  notably  in  the  vicinity of
the pond) reflect  the Influence of the  remedial activities.  Although
this explanation  cannot be readily applied  to explain  the  decreased
 lead concentration  1n the sample  from monitoring  well  MW-11C, it is
more significant  that a relatively low  lead concentration  was detected
 at this location  1n both  instances.   Given  the presence of  highly con-
taminated soils  immediately to  the north  (Figures 3-2,  3-3, and  3-5),
the presence of  the  low lead levels  supports  the potentlometric  map
for this aquifer  system,  which  indicates  that flow  should  be  predomi-
nantly from the  west-northwest  (i.e., from  an uncontaminated  area).
                                  3-51

     caper                                             	I.,,,, „„,( ..,„„•„,„„, „,

-------
In contrast to the beneficial  effects of the remedial activities dis-
cussed above,  these same  activities have probably resulted in the
increased lead concentration detected in the groundwater from monitor-
ing well  MW-13C,  given  that much  of the surface runoff from the site
is now funneled to this location.
     Figure 3-20 indicates that the highest lead concentrations in the
intermediate aquifer system also  occur across the western half of the
site in areas  where the surficial  aquifer system was most contami-
nated.  Similar to the  results for the surficial aquifer system,
changes in the intermediate system lead concentrations from 1983 to
1985 can  be attributed  to the  effects of remedial activities combined
with the  direction of groundwater movement.
     Lead concentrations  measured in the on-site Floridan aquifer sys-
tem monitoring wells (Figure 3-21) are again highest in the western
half of the site.  Furthermore, the Floridan system groundwater (with
the exception  of MW-05A)  exhibits very large increases in lead concen-
tration relative to the 1983 levels.  A possible explanation for these
results will be offered in the next section.

3.4.2.3  Aquifer Selected Metals  Concentrations
     Among the other metal species for which analyses were conducted--
arsenic,  antimony, cadmium, selenium, nickel (in the residential wells
only), aluminum, and manganese--only the  latter two metals (aluminum
and manganese) were found in high concentrations in a number of
samples (Tables D-9 through D-12, Appendix  D).  Arsenic concentrations
significantly exceeded  EPA and FDER primary drinking water standards
(0.05 ppm)  in two samples (MW-03C and MW-12A,  0.282 and 0.092  ppm,
respectively).  The EPA recommended guideline  on antimony  (0.146 mg/1)
was not exceeded  in any sample.   In contrast,  cadmium concentrations
in excess of the drinking water  standard  (0.01 ppm) were found in
several samples:  MW-12C, 16C, and 18C  (0.014, 0.076, and  0.023  ppm,
respectively); MW-03B,  03BB,  and  07B  (0.021, 0.246, and 0.032  ppm,
respectively); and DW-02 and  MW-13A  (0.026  and 0.011  ppm,  respec-
tively).   Selenium was detected  in 11  on-site  monitoring wells,  with
four  exhibiting concentrations in excess  of the EPA drinking water
                                   3-52

-------
  standard of 0.01 ppm.  These four wells  are:   MW-3A, MW-3B, MW-148,
  and MW-16C.  They had selenium concentrations  of 0.029, 0.020, 0.013,
  and 0.019 ppm, respectively.  Only one residential well sample
  exhibited a nickel  concentration above the  detection limit of 0.020
  ppm (GW-18, 0.025 ppm).   In general,  the occurrence of these metals
 was associated with the  presence of relatively high concentrations of
  lead.
      Most of the on-site groundwater  samples exhibit very high alumi-
 num and manganese concentrations (Tables  D-9 through D-ll, Appendix
 0).  In FDER's interpretation  of the  analytical results of the 1983
 sampling, these high concentrations were  attributed to decomposition
 of the aquifer matrix materials  by acidic groundwater (Watts 1984).
 Although a comparison of the 1983 pH  data in Tables D-5 through D-7
 with the corresponding aluminum  and manganese  concentrations in Tables
 D-13 through D-15 supports  this  interpretation, it cannot be as
 readily invoked to  explain  the results of the  current sampling pro-
 gram because many of the groundwater  samples with elevated aluminum or
 manganese concentrations do not  exhibit  low pH values.  Furthermore,
 although the FDER-RI,  using equilibrium thermodynamics, calculated a
 maximum theoretical  aluminum solubility of 149 ppb for the Floridan
 aquifer system (at  a pH  of  7.4),  the  fact that Floridan lead concen-
 trations currently  far exceed  the calculated maximum theoretical lead
 solubility  of 81  ppb suggests  that  reaction kinetics may play an even
 more critical  role  in  the precipitation of metal species than
 expected.   Consequently,  despite  the  alleviation of the acidic condi-
 tions favorable to  leaching, the  potentially slow precipitation of
 metal complexes could  possibly result  in very high concentrations of
 aluminum and  manganese being retained  in solution.
     Interpretation  of these data becomes even more difficult when the
 lead versus  aluminum,  lead  versus manganese, and aluminum versus man-
 ganese  relations  are considered  (Tables D-9 through D-ll, Appendix 0).
 Although  the  highest aluminum  and manganese concentrations are gen-
 erally  associated with high  lead concentrations, the correspondence is
 very imperfect  and exhibits major deviations in all three aquifer
 systems  (with the exception of the  lead versus manganese relation in
 the surficial aquifer  system).   Furthermore, manganese and aluminum
concentrations exhibit a very  poor correlation, even though both
                                 3-53
     pacer

-------
metals are assumed to be derived  from  acid decomposition of aquifer
matrix materials.   Similar  deviations  from a  linear correspondence
occur in the 1983 FDER results  (Tables D-13 through D-15, Appendix
D).
     Despite the complexities described  above, there  is a possible
interpretation if consideration is  given to the following:

     1.  Several of the grotindwater samples contained suspended sedi-
         ments derived from the aquifer.  Given that the samples were
         not filtered before preservation with concentrated nitric
         acid (to a pH of approximately  1), any adsorbed or matrix
         metals associated  with the suspended material could have been
         subject to leaching.   This probably  also  influenced the 1983
         FDER results, although the effect may have been somewhat
         reduced in the low pH  samples.

     2.  Under the relatively  acidic groundwater conditions that
         existed during the 1983  FDER  sampling effort, aluminum and
         lead appear to have been more mobile than manganese,  based  on
         the occurrence of  these  metals  in groundwater from the down-
         gradient residential wells east of the site  (Table D-16).

     3.  In contrast, under the more alkaline pH conditions that
         existed during the current sampling  program, manganese
         appears to have replaced aluminum as the  more mobile  species.
         This conclusion is indicated  by the  close correlation of
         manganese and lead in  the  surficial  aquifer  system in which
         the change in pH conditions was most pronounced,  and  the fact
         that manganese now accompanies  lead  in groundwater from those
         downgradient residential wells  which previously  exhibited
         elevated aluminum concentrations.

     4.  Groundwater pH  is not the only  control on metal  species
         mobility; hence, the  extremely  intricate  combined effect of
         pH, redox conditions,  presence  of complexing ions or organic
         species, mineralogy and cation  exchange  capacity of  the
         aquifer matrix material,  and reaction  kinetics—all  of which
                                 3-54

-------
           may exhibit vertical  and lateral  variability on-site—will
           determine to what extent a specific metal  is mobilized at any
           given moment or location.

       Consequently, it is possible that  in  response  to physical and
  temporal variations in the hydrogeochemical environment of the Sapp
  Battery site,  aluminum and manganese have  been  locally mobilized or
  demobilized (i.e., precipitated  or adsorbed onto the aquifer matrix).
  The pattern of groundwater metal  concentrations that this could pro-
  duce might be  to some extent obscured by the leaching of adsorbed or
  matrix metals  due to acidification of unfiltered samples (especially
  if located in  a zone of current  or past demobilization).  As discussed
  in the following section,  the  excellent agreement between the pattern
  of lead concentrations in  each aquifer  system and the corresponding
  general groundwater flow directions indicated by Figures 3-16 through
  3-18 suggests  that lead is mobile under the existing conditions and
  not as subject to the factors  which produce the variability  in alumi-
  num and manganese.

  3.4.3  Contaminant Migration
       It is clear from the  results of the current sampling effort that
  all three aquifer systems  underlying the Sapp Battery site are
  contaminated.   As noted in the preceding section, the highest lead
  concentrations occur over  the  western half of the site in close asso-
  ciation with those areas exhibiting the highest levels of soil con-
  tamination (compare Figures 3-2  through 3-4 with Figures 3-18 through
  3-20).   Comparison of Figures  3-16 and  3-17 shows that water level
  elevations in  the surficial aquifer system are  higher than those in
  the intermediate aquifer system  across  much of  the  site.  Consequent-
  ly, there exists a natural  vertical hydraulic gradient that  is much
  greater than the shallow horizontal gradient, and the contaminants
  could readily  migrate from the surficial to the intermediate aquifer
  system, especially at those locations where sinkholes, paleo-stream
  channels,  or more permeable confining unit lithologies provide better
  hydraulic connection.   This potential for  downward  migration would
  have  been particularly strong  prior to  the cessation of  site opera-
  tions in January 1980 as a result of the drawdown response  in these
                                   3-55
'ecvc'-dodoer                                            	,,,,., ,„„, ,mir,.,

-------
systems to the presumably high pumpage at  the plant  well  (DW-01).
This postulation is based on the fact  that a  pump  test  conducted by
the U.S. Geological Survey on October  26-27,  1983,  indicated  that  all
three aquifer systems exhibit a drawdown response  to pumpage  of a  well
open to the Floridan aquifer system.   The  results  of this  pump test
are presented in the FDER-RI.
     Water level elevations in the Floridan aquifer  system (Figure
3-18) are more than 20 feet lower than those.of  the  overlying inter-
mediate aquifer system.  This large vertical  hydraulic  gradient would
certainly support downward migration of contaminants into  the upper
part of the Floridan aquifer system, especially  where confinement  is
less effective (I.e., due to breaching by  sinkholes  or  changes in  con-
fining unit lithology).  Pumping of well DW-01 prior to January 1980
would not only have enhanced this downward migration potential, but
also would have provided a mechanism for the  transport  of  contaminants
deeper into the aquifer system.
     The current sampling program indicated much higher on-site con-
centrations of lead in groundwater from the Floridan aquifer  system
than were found during the 1983 FDER sampling effort (see  Figure
3-21).  It would appear that whereas in 1983  only  a  dilute contaminant
front had penetrated to the screened interval  depths of the monitoring
wells open to this system, by the time of  the 1985 sampling an
undilute contaminant front had penetrated  to  these depths.  However,
the mechanism for creating this strong downward  dispersion in the
absence of on-site pumpage is not clear.   It  seems probable that com-
plex hydrogeochemical interactions associated with changes in ground-
water and aquifer matrix chemistry induced by penetration  of  the con-
taminant front (e.g., the lower pH values  discussed  previously) have
had the effect of creating an enhanced downward  dispersion component.
     Comparison of Figures 3-16 through 3-18  with  Figures  3-19" through
3-21 reveals the close correlation between the distribution pattern of
lead concentrations and the general direction of groundwater  flow
within each aquifer system.  In accordance with  the  respective flow
systems, the contaminant front is generally migrating east-southeast
in the surficial aquifer system, south-southwest in  the intermediate
aquifer system, and east in the Floridan aquifer system.   The
                                   3-56

-------
  southwesterly  component  of  contaminant  front  migration  in  the inter-
 mediate  aquifer  system is of  particular significance  because  of the
 potential for  eventual contamination  of the Floridan  aquifer  system
 west  and southwest of the site  via  downward leakage.
       The following section  presents the results  of  a  computer simula-
 tion  of contaminant front migration within each  of  the  three  on-site
 aquifer  systems.
                                   3-57
recycled paper	„, „,,,)

-------
3.5  COMPUTER SIMULATION OF CONTAMINANT FRONT MIGRATION
3.5.1  Description of Models
     The results of the groundwater investigation  reported  in  Section
3.4 showed that each of the on-site aquifer  systems was  subject to
high levels of lead contamination at specific locations.  The  areas of
greatest groundwater contamination were generally  associated with
areas of highest soil contamination.   Furthermore, the contaminant
front seemed to be migrating in the direction of groundwater flow
indicated by the potentiometric maps (Figures 3-16 through  3-18).
Consequently, groundwater flow and solute  transport models  were
applied to each of the three aquifer systems  to simulate the migration
of the contaminant front over time.   Input data for these models were
limited to the 44-well monitoring network.  Residential  wells  were not
included because of the distance of each from the  site and  the detail
needed to illustrate the required contaminant isopleths.   It was not
necessary to apply an overly sophisticated groundwater flow model to
the site because a water level data base had  been  developed in the
field.   A simple flow model based on Darcy's  Law was  applied to this
data base in order to convert the groundwater heads to a groundwater
velocity field.
     The finite element solute transport model used for  the simulation
of contaminant front migration for all  aquifers is known as FEMWASTE
and was developed by Oak Ridge National Laboratory (Yeh  1981)  and
recommended by EPA (1985).   For a comparison  and check of the  finite
element model, the Floridan Aquifer lead plume was also  modeled and
simulations performed using a simplified Random-Walk  (Prickett, et^
a!., 1981) solute transport finite difference model.  The Random-Walk
model prediction was further used to predict  the general effect of
pumping the Floridan Aquifer for remedial  purposes.

3.5.1.1  FEMWASTE Model for All Aquifers at  the Sapp  Battery Site
     Figure 3-23 shows the 120-node,  99-element FEMWASTE finite ele-
ment grid system that was developed for the  Sapp Battery site. As can
be seen from the figure, this grid system  was developed  so  that almost
all of the on-site monitoring wells occur  as  nodal points.   It should
be understood that each aquifer was modeled  separately,  and three-
dimensional techniques were not employed.  For each aquifer system,
                                 3-58

-------
OJ
I
Ul
                                         O 10
                                                20O
                                                        SCALE

                                                        4OO
                                                               60O
                                                                       BOO FCET
                                           O1O	fiO
                                                       1OO     15O
                                                                    2OO METERS
                          Figure3-23   FEMWASTE ELEMENT GRID SYSTEM FOR ALL THREE AQUIFERS
                                     AT THE SAPP BATTERY SITE

-------
the nodal points associated with monitoring wells that exhibited the
highest levels of groundwater contamination were chosen to represent
source areas for the contaminant plume.  For instance, for the
Floridan aquifer simulation, monitoring wells DW-1, DW-2, MW-1A,
MW-3A, and MW-14A were considered source points.

3.5.1.2  Random-Walk Model for the Floridan Aquifer at the Sapp
         Battery Site
     Figure 3-24 displays the Random-Walk finite difference grid sys-
tem which was used for the Floridan Aquifer at the Sapp battery site.
As illustrated, nine columns lie along the "x" axis (East-West), and
eight rows along the "y" axis (North-South).  Hence, a total of 72
cells exist for this simulation.  The distance between each cell is
200 feet.  The contaminant source positions for this model were
assumed to be two rectangular areas which covered:  1) the pond and
synthetic liner vicinity south of the foundation, and 2) the northwest
landfill location.  The contamination mass for this model was calcu-
lated based on the average existing lead concentrations of Floridan
Aquifer monitoring wells DW-1, DW-2, MW-1A, MW-3A, and MW-14A.

3.5.1.3  Model Parameters
     The model parameters listed in Table 3-2 were used in the com-
puter simulations.  Lead was chosen as the chemical parameter to be
simulated in the solute transport model because the analytical results
of the groundwater sampling effort clearly indicate that the lead con-
centration distribution within each aquifer system most closely
parallels the groundwater flow pattern.  In addition, lead is the con-
taminant of most concern at this site (Sections 3.4.2 and 3.4.3).  For
this same reason, a low retardation factor of 1 and a first-order
decay constant of 0 for lead was assumed.  Although lead  is probably
being adsorbed onto the aquifer matrices to some extent, this effect
is believed to be sufficiently small as to not significantly affect
the simulation.  A porosity of 0.3 was assumed for each aquifer sys-
tem, the values for the coefficients of longitudinal and  traverse dis-
persivity were obtained from available literature, and the hydraulic
conductivities were based on field measurements carried out by FDER
(Watts 1984) and E & E's current groundwater investigation.  Finally,
                                  3-60

-------
                      Table 3-2

                  MODEL PARAMETERS
              USED IN COMPUTER PROGRAM
Lead retardation factor                  1

First-order decay constant               0

Porosity                                 0.3

Longitudinal dispersivity                205 ft

Transverse dispersivity                  0

Hydraulic conductivity
  a  Surficial aquifer system            0.283 ft/day
  a  Intermediate aquifer system         0.072 ft/day
  a  Flondan aquifer system             14.4 ft/day

Starting date                            1985
                         3-62

-------
s
o
a.
13

-------
OJ
I
cr>
                                         o  too
                                                          SCALE
                                                         BOO
                                                 SO
                                                       100
                                                            150
                                                                  2OO
                                                                           1OOOFEET
                                                                        260 METERS
                              Figure 3-25   COMPUTED LEAD PLUME. 1 YEAR PREDICTION (1986)

                                          SURFICIAL AQUIFER (FEMWASTE)

-------
the starting date of 1985 for the computer  simulation of solute trans-
port was selected because the finite  element model considers that
monitoring wells with the highest levels  of contamination represent
source areas, and the most current data was collected in 1985.  Once
the 1985 data were entered into the models, the present simulation was
reviewed and calibrated to achieve the best resemblance to the outer-
most monitoring wells, i.e.,  MW-05A,  05B; MW-06A, 06B; MW-08B; MW-21A,
218; and MW-22A, 22B.  Although node  points do not exist for residen-
tial wells, the data from the residential well samples were taken into
consideration when the model  was calibrated.  From the best fit 1985
models, 1- and 5-year (1986 and 1990)  lead  contaminant plume predic-
tions were performed.  In addition, a 5-  and 10-year  (1990 and 1995)
prediction was conducted with the Random-Walk simulation of the
         •
Floridan aquifer.

3.5.2  Simulation Results
3.5.2.1  FEMWASTE Model Predictions for all Aquifers
     The groundwater velocity fields  generated by the model  indicate
that the groundwater flow rate is very  low  within the surficial  and
intermediate aquifer systems  (0.5 to  4.0  ft/year  in both), whereas  it
is much higher (10 to 70 ft/year) within  the Floridan aquifer  system.
This difference in flow velocity between  the shallow  and deep  aquifer
systems is reflected in the predicted positions of the contaminant
fronts within each aquifer system (Figures  3-25 through 3-30).   The
position of the 500-ppb lead contour  for  the surficial and  inter-
mediate systems represents only slight  migration  of the contaminant
front toward the southeast and southwest, respectively.  This  is
amplified by the fact that only a very slight  change  in the size of
the 500-ppb contour exists between the  1- and  5-year  prediction  maps.
The position configuration of the 500-ppb lead contour  in  the Floridan
system indicates a large degree of front  migration toward  the east,
increasing significantly from the 1-year  to the 5-year  prediction.
Furthermore, the 5-year simulation for the Floridan  system shows the
10-ppb lead contour  as still on-site (Figure 3-30).   However, the
analytical results for the residential  well samples  east  of the site
(Section 3.4.2)  indicate that this contour has already moved off-site.
This discrepancy most  likely reflects the fact that  the values of the
                                 3-63
     paper                                            r. i.l
-------
CO
I
en
                                        o  too
 SCALE
6QO
                                                                         10OO FEET
                                                50
                                                      IOO
                                                           150
                                                                 3OO
                                                                      250 METERS
                               Figure 3-27   COMPUTED LEAD PLUME. 1 YEAR PREDICTION (1986)
                                           FLORIDAN AQUIFER (FEMWASTE)

-------
OJ
I
en
en
                                           100
                                                         SCALE
                                                        !>OO
                                                                         10OO FEET
                                                 60
                                                      100
                                                           160
                                                                 3OO
                                                                       2SO METERS
                             Figure 3-26  COMPUTED LEAD PLUME, 1 YEAR PREDICTION (1986)
                                         INTERMEDIATE AQUIFER  cMWASTE)

-------
CO
I
CD
                                       0   10O
                                                        SCALE
                                                       5OO
                                                                        1000 FEET
                                               50
                                                     100
                                                          150
                                                                2OO
                                                                     2SO METERS
                            Figure 3-29   COMPUTED LEAD PLUME. 5 YEAR PREDICTION (1990)
                                        INTERMEDIATE AQUIFER (FEMWASTE)

-------
              100
                             SCALE
                            500
                                             1000 FEET
                    60
                          100
                               ISO
                                     200
                                          250 METERS
Figure 3-28   COMPUTED LEAD PLUME. 5 YEAR PREDICTION (1990)
            SURFICIAL AQUIFER (FEMWASTE)

-------
hydrologic parameters used in the model are somewhat  conservative,  in
that they do not fully account for the secondary permeability
characteristics of the karstic terrain. .  Consequently,  it  could  be
hypothesized that the 500-ppb lead contour for the Floridan  aquifer
system would also exist slightly further  to the east  in five years
than is indicated by Figure 3-30.

3.5.2.2  Random-Walk Model Predictions for the Floridan Aquifer
     Figures 3-31 and 3-32 show the Random-Walk prediction for the
lead plume configuration in 1990 and 1995.   In general,  the  Random-
Walk predictions have a similar trend to  that of the  FEMWASTE predic-
tions discussed earlier.  This is based on the fact that other models
show the plume extending toward the east,  south, and  west.   The  con- .
tamination front appears to be most significant in the  southerly
direction.  The actual concentration limits,  however, of the Random-
Walk predictions are much greater than those  of the FEMWASTE model.
For example, in 1990, the 10-ppb isopleth  of  the FEMWASTE  simulation
is at the same general position as the 50-ppb isopleth  in  the Random-
Walk prediction.  Based on the existing data  for the  surrounding resi-
dential wells, it appears that the Random-Walk prediction  is more in
line with actual future plume migration.   The 1995 Random-Walk predic-
tion shows additional spreading of the lead plume to  the point that
the 50-ppb isopleth is off the base map except in the northeast  quad-
rant.  Therefore, based on these estimates and assuming that the site
soils (or source) are not treated, the nearby surrounding  residential
wells are most likely to have lead concentrations in  excess  of 50 ppb
by 1995.

3.5.3  Random-Walk Model Prediction of Various Floridan Aquifer
       Pumping and Treatment Schemes
     Six different scenarios were used to  make a Random-Walk predic-
tion of the effects of pumping and treating the Floridan Aquifer in
the Sapp Battery site vicinity.  These essentially include pumping the
Floridan  Aquifer at 1 million, 0.5 million, and 0.25  million gallons
per day (mgpd) and either injecting that water back into the Floridan
system downgradient of the site or discharging directly to a local
surface drainage point.
                                 3-70

-------
I
o\
                                       o  100
                                                        SCALE
                                                       BOO
1OOO FEET
                                               50
                                                     100
                                                          ISO
                                                                200
                                                                     250 METERS
                              Figure 3-30   COMPUTED LEAD PLUME. 5 YEAR PREDICTION (1990)
                                          FLORIDAN AQUIFER (FEMWASTE)

-------
CO
I
                                                      MODEL COLUMN NUMBERS
                                                 3	  466
                                          O  SO
                                                  200
 SCALE

4OO
                                                                    6OO
                                                                             800 FEET
                                             010	 50
                                                           1OO
                                                                  15O
                                                                         2OO METERS
                                Figure 3-32   COMPUTED LEAD PLUME. 10 YEAR PREDICTION (1995)
                                             FLORIDAN AQUIFEP 'RANDOM-WALK)

-------
                                                      MODEL COLUMN NUMBERS
                                                          4        6
CO
                                         a 50
                                                 200
                                                            SCALE

                                                          400
                                                                    600
BOO FEET
                                            O1O	SO
                                                          1OO
                                                                  ISO
                                                                         20O METERS
                                Figure 3-31   COMPUTED LEAD °' UME, 5 YEAR PREDICTION (1990)
                                            FLORIDAN AOUI     (RANDOM-WALK)

-------
                                     Table  3-3

                VARIOUS RANDOM-WALK  MODEL  PREDICTIONS  FOR  PUMPING
            AND TREATING  THE FLORIDAN  AQUIFER  AT  THE SAPP  BATTERY SITE
Pimping Well Concentration
After Source Sipped (ppb)
Sceneno
1A
1B
2A
2B
3A
3B
Puip ing
Rate*
1
1
0.5
0.5
0.25
0.25
Injection
Rate*
0
1
0
0.5
0
0.25
Surface
Discharge
Rate*
1
0
0.5
0
0.25
0
1 year
(1988)
A37
423
570
588
730
672
5 year
(1992)
32
35
135
129
308
241
10 year
(1997)
— _
—
3
5
51
72
*MGPD = Million gallons per day
                                          3-74
                                                                             ir>it.rtit i

-------
     The interrelationships between  the  shallow and intermediate
aquifer systems and between groundwater  and surface water were not
modeled.  This would require three-dimensional modeling, which was
beyond the scope of this study.   Furthermore, the complexity of the
vertical aquifer system, due to  factors  such as sinkholes and karstic
features, is too great to be modeled with reasonable confidence, even
using three-dimensional models.
     Table 3-3 lists the prediction  results for the various pumping
rates at 1, 5, and 10 years.   This format assumes that the contamina-
tion source will be stopped by 1987  through soil and sediment remedia-
tion.
     In general the data on Table 3-3  show that pumping  at 1 mgpd with
either injection or surface water discharge would clean  the aquifer to
below drinking water standards in less than 5 years.   However,  at such
a large pumping rate, the concentration  of the contaminant begins at
423 to 437 ppb lead and decreases with time.  Thus, an extremely  large
treatment method with the ability to effectively clean less than  500
ppb would be needed.  At 0.25 mgpd,  on the other hand, the pumping
well lead concentration increases because  it  is not being diluted by
clean aquifer water from the surrounding area.  However, an  additional
5 years (1997) is needed to get  close  to present day drinking water
standards.
                                  3-73

-------
number, date, sample number, parameters to be  analyzed for,  and  pres-
ervation media.  Before the samples were packed in a cooler  for  ship-
ment to E & E's laboratory, they were photographed and the  sample  num-
ber, location, date and time of collection, parameters to be  analyzed
for each sample, and any comments were entered onto a chain-of-
custody form.  One copy of this form was included in the sample
cooler, and a second copy was filed in the Tallahassee office.   All
data recorded in the sample log, on sample identification tags,  and on
chain-of-custody forms were written in ink.

4.1.2  Samples
     During sampling, field QA/QC was conducted in accordance with
standard operating procedures.  These procedures, outlined  in E  &  E's
Quality Assurance/Quality Control Procedures Manual, were developed  in
accordance with EPA standards.  The QA/QC samples consisted  of sample
duplicates, sampling equipment rinsates, and trip bottle blanks.
Tables 4-1 through 4-5 present a complete list of the QA/QC  sample
analysis requirements.  Appendix F includes all QA/QC sample  results
under separate cover.
     Sample duplicates were selected randomly.  One sample  duplicate
was taken for approximately every 10 samples.  Duplicates of  samples
to be archived were not collected.  Duplicate  samples are gathered as
a check for homogeniety of the sample medium and are not an  indication
of the consistency of laboratory analyses.  Soil and sediment dupli-
cate samples showed some wide variations for lead but the majority did
not exceed an order of magnitude difference.   Accessory metals such  as
antimony and cadmium show good correlations where they were  detected.
Typically, soil metal duplicates show more deviation than other  media.
This is attributed to the fact that:  contaminants are not  isotropi-
cally dispersed in soil, especially hard clays; and physical  homogeni-
zation Is more difficult.  If, for example, a  duplicate sample con-
tained more clay, a higher percentage of metals would occur  due  to the
increased medium for adsorption.  As the majority of soil samples  at
Sapp Battery were clayey, these trends were reflected by metal varia-
tions between the original and duplicate samples.
     Sampling equipment was decontaminated after each sample  was taken
(see Section 2).  To evaluate the effectiveness of the equipment
                                   4-2

-------
                4.  QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY  CONTROL
4.1  FIELDWORK
4.1.1  Documentation
     Daily logs  and data forms were  kept  in  sufficient  detail  to
enable reconstruction of the events  that  occurred during  the  project.
This information was also kept to refresh the memory  of field  per-
sonnel if called on to give testimony during legal proceedings.
     Daily logs  (site, task, and  individual) were kept  in bound,
waterproof notebooks with numbered pages.  Entries were made  in water-
proof ink, dated,  and signed.  Corrections were  made  by crossing  a
line through the error and entering  the corrected information.  All
corrections were initialed and dated by the  person making the  change.
     The site log was the responsibility  of  the  site  team leader  and
included the daily log of on-site activities.
     A summary of task log inclusions is  provided in  the Quality
Assurance Project Plan (QAPP), Feasibility Study for  Sapp Battery
site, Jackson County, Florida, November 1985, p. 5-29.
     Photographs are the most  accurate record of field  observations
and are crucial  to validating  actual field situations.   Information
noted in the field notebook concerning photographs  can  be found in  the
QAPP for the Sapp Battery site, p. 5-30.
     Sample log  books were used to record:   specific  sample station
numbers, date and time the sample was taken, sample  location, param-
eters to be analyzed for, and  any comments.
     Samples were placed in the appropriate  sample  jars with appro-
priate sample identification labels. These  labels  included the job
                                   4-1

-------
                                       Table 4-3

                  MONITORING WELL QA/QC SAMPLE ANALYSIS  REQUIREMENTS
Required
Samples
Duplicates
                            Sampling
                            Equipment
                            Rinaates
                               Trip
                             Bottle
                             Blanks
                         Total
                            Analyses
                                                        55       pH,  lead,  cadmium,
                                                                antimony,  aluminum,
                                                                arsenic,  manganese,
                                                                selenium

                                                         6       Priority  pollutant
                                                                organics,  priority  pol-
                                                                lutant  metals,  acid/
                                                                base neutral  extract -
                                                                ables,  pesticides,  sul-
                                                                fate, cyanide
                                      Table 4-4

                 RESIDENTIAL WELL QA/QC SAMPLE ANALYSIS  REQUIREMENTS
Requi red
Samples
Duplicates
                            Sampling
                            Equipment
                            Rinsatea
                              Trip
                             Bottle
                             Blanks
                         Total
                            Analyses
   25
                                           27      pH,  lead,  aluminum,
                                                  cadmium,  antimony,
                                                  arsenic,  manganese,
                                                  nickel, selenium

                                            1      Priority  pollutant
                                                  organics,  priority pol-
                                                  lutant metals,  acid/
                                                  base neutral  extract-
                                                  ables, pesticides, sul-
                                                  fate, cyanide
                                      Table 4-5

                   SURFACE WATER QA/QC SAMPLE ANALYSIS  REQUIREMENTS
Required
Samplea
Duplicates
Sampling
Equipment
Rinsates
 Trip
Bottle
Blanks
                                                     Total
                                                          Analyses
                                                                Priority  pollutant
                                                                organics,  priority  pol-
                                                                lutant  metals,  acid/
                                                                base  neutral  extract -
                                                                ables,  pesticides,  sul-
                                                                fate, cyanide
                                         4-4
     ace-

-------
                                      Table 4-1

                       SOIL QA/QC SAMPLE ANALYSIS REQUIREMENTS
Required
Samples
Duplicates
Sampling       Trip
Equipment     Bottle
Rinsatea      Blanks
                     Total
       Analyses
  145

  108
    11

    14
                      159      pH,  lead,  5 moisture

                      134      pH,  lead,  cadmium,
                               antimony,  S moisture

                        8      Priority pollutant
                               organic*,  priority  pol-
                               lutant metals, acid/
                               base neutral extract-
                               ables, pesticides,  sul-
                               fate, cyanide
                                      Table 4-2

                     SEDIMENT QA/QC SAMPLE ANALYSIS REQUIREMENTS

Required
Samples
Sampling
Equipment
Duplicates Rinsates
Trip
Bottle
Blanks Total Analyses
   81


    5
     9


     0
a

o
99      pH, lead, cadmium,
        antimony, S moisture

 5      Priority pollutant
        metals, priority pol-
        lutant organics, acid/
        base neutral extract-
        ables, pesticides,  sul-
        fats, cyanide
                                         4-3

-------
 (7.12  ppm).   Given that the background lead level for the Sapp Battery
 area is  considered to be about 30 ppm, whereas contaminated sample
 concentrations are, at a minimum, an order of magnitude higher, even
 this relatively high rinsate lead concentration would have little
 effect on the analytical results for the soil samples.  It is probable
 that lead was inadvertently introduced in particulate form during
 collection of this rinsate sample.  In contrast, the lead values of
 1.48 and 1.77 ppm in rinsate samples FSR04 and FSR07, respectively,
 are most likely the result of airborne dust particles contaminating
 the equipment after the decontamination and during rinsate sample
 collection.   Antimony and cadmium values were below detection limits
 (.06 and .005, respectively) for all rinsate samples except FSR07,
 which  showed cadmium at 0.007 ppm.  Again, this can be attributed to
 contamination by aeolian particles during collection of the rinsate
 sample.
     Most of the eight sediment sampling equipment rinsates samples
 exhibited lead concentrations below detection limits.  The low levels
 in FSR15 (1.95 ppm) and FSR18 (0.036 ppm) can again be attributed to
 airborne contamination of the equipment.
      Of  the  six groundwater rinsate samples, only GWR02 and GWR04
 showed lead  concentrations (0.028 ppm) above the detection limits.
 These  values are also attributed to airborne contamination.
      Parameters noted in the field during sampling (pH, conductivity,
 temperature, color, and texture) were recorded by sampling personnel
 and filed at the end of each day.  Meters used in the field were
 subject  to regular maintenance and calibration.  Calibration and main-
 tenance  data were also recorded and filed.
      Further information on QA/QC requirements and procedures is given
 on pp. 5-18  through 5-20 of the QAPP for the Sapp Battery site
 (November 1985).
                                    4-6
'•?:•«:>ec race-

-------
 decontamination procedure,  sampling equipment  rinsate samples were
 taken.   After  the  equipment  had  been subjected  to  the usual  decontami-
 nation  procedure,  distilled  water was poured  over  or through it and
 collected  for  analysis.   One rinsate sample was generally taken for
 each  day of sampling.  However,  on days  when  only  a very few samples
 were  taken,  collection of a  rinsate sample was  omitted.
      For every lot of  bottles used to collect  samples,  an empty bottle
 (trip bottle blank)  was  carried  into the field  during sampling and
 then  shipped to the  laboratory for analysis.  The  purpose of the trip
 bottle  blank is to certify that  the bottles were not contaminated
 during  handling on-site.  To ensure that the  distilled  water used in
 the decontamination  of sampling  equipment, which was purchased from
 local grocery  and  drug stores,  was not contaminated,* four of the trip
 bottle  blank bottles (two soil/sediment  and two water)  were  filled
 with  this  water.   Both the soil/sediment (SBB01-07)  and  groundwater
 (GBB02,  03)  bottle blanks exhibited metal concentrations below detec-
 tion  limits.   Soil blank  SBB01  showed 9  ug/1  acetone; 4  ug/1 1,1,1-
 trichloroethane; and 7 ug/1  methexene chloride  upon  analysis for
 priority pollutant volatile  organics.  However, these compounds were
 noted as being  present in the  corresponding instrument  blanks only
 slightly above  the 3 ug/1 detection limit.  As  a result, all nine
 bottle  blanks were intrinsically clean.
      Water  for  on-site use was  obtained  from  the supply well at the
 Alford  Fire  House, located approximately 2 miles south-southeast of
 the site in  the Town of  Alford  (GW-29; Figure 2-6).   A sample of this
water was  analyzed and found  to  contain  0.023 ppm  lead,  the  highest
concentration detected in an  off-site residential  well.   The results
of the  groundwater Investigation strongly suggest  that  contamination
of this  well must  be attributed  to some  unknown source rather than the
 Sapp  Battery site.   A second  Alford Fire House  sample was collected
 and analyzed to confirm  these  data.  The results indicated 0.013 ppm
 lead.    It  is also  unlikely that  the presence  of this lead had any
 significant  effect on the analytical  results  of the investigation,
given  that all   sampling  equipment was rinsed  with  distilled  water
before  re-use.
     Of  the  10  soil  sampling  equipment rinsate  samples that  were  col-
lected  and analyzed, FSR06 exhibited the highest lead concentration
                                  4-5

-------
quantity of surrogate and internal standard compounds  is added.  The
organic volatile compounds, including surrogate and internal stan-
dards, are purged from solution  in a stream of  inert gas and trapped
from vapor on a suitable material.  The trap tube  is then heated, and
the trapped materials desorbed by backflushing  into a  gas chromato-
graph under standard conditions.  Eluting peaks enter  a mass spec-
trometer.  Individual components are identified by mass spectrum and
quantified by primary ion ratio to that of the  internal standard.

     Semi-volatile Compounds.  Soil or water aliquots, to which  a
measured quantity of surrogate compounds has been  added, are extracted
into methylene chloride.  Water  samples are extracted  twice:   once  at
pH 12 for extraction of basic and neutral components,  and once at pH 2
     *
for extraction of acidic components (mainly phenols).  Soil  samples
are extracted once using a sonication apparatus.   Extracts  (combined
if necessary) are spiked with internal standard solution and analyzed
by 6C/MS.  Peaks are identified  and quantified  as  for  volatile com-
pounds.

     Pesticides and PCBs.  Soil  or water samples to which a surrogate
standard has been added are extracted into methylene chloride.   The
extract is exchanged into hexane and cleaned up by column chromato-
graphy.  The extract is then analyzed by gas chromatography/electron
capture detector by external standard procedures.

4.2.1.2  Metals Analyses
     The following summary of analytical methods for metals analysis
is taken from E & E's Standard Operating Procedures Manual.  Either
inductively-coupled argon plasma spectroscopy  (ICP) or atomic  absorp-
tion spectrophotometry was used  as appropriate  to  meet contract  re-
quired detection limits.  Table  4-6 summarizes  metal detection limits
and methods used to analyze sample digestates.
     Sample digestion procedures depend on the  matrix, the  method of
analysis used, and the metal being analyzed.  These are summarized
below.
                                   4-8

-------
4.2  LABORATORY SAMPLE ANALYSIS
     Samples of groundwater, well water, surface water, soils, and
sediments were analyzed for metals and organics using analytical
methods promulgated by EPA for use on CERCLA (or Superfund) investiga-
tions.  These procedures are described generally in Section 4.2.1
below.
     Samples were analyzed by E & E's laboratory in Buffalo, New York,
and by Environmental Protection Systems, Inc., (EPS) in Pensacola,
Florida.  Both laboratories are approved by FOER for the analyses they
conducted.  The E & E laboratory is contracted to EPA to provide
organics analysis for the Superfund program, and laboratory personnel
are thoroughly familiar with the analytical and reporting requirements
of that program.  EPS is currently seeking certification by EPA to
participate in the organics analysis portion of the Superfund program.
Both E & E and EPS results were subject to quality assurance  (QA)
review by E & E's independent staff of QA chemists.  Neither  labora-
tory was aware of sample designations as duplicates or blanks at the
time of analysis.

4.2.1  Analytical Methods
     Samples were analyzed by EPA Contract Laboratory protocols.  Full
details are provided in the following references:

     o  Statement of Work for Organics Analysis, Multimedia,  Multi-
        concentration, EPA Contract Laboratory Program, revised  July
        1985.

     o  Statement of Work for Inorganics Analysis,  Multimedia,  Multi-
        concentration, EPA Contract Laboratory Program, revised  August
        1985.

The analytical methods are briefly described  below.

4.2.1.1  Organic Analyses

     Volatile Compounds.  Soil or water  aliquots are introduced to
the purge tube of a purge-and-trap apparatus.  A precisely measured
                                   4-7

-------
     o  For water samples  analyzed  by  furnace  atomic  absorption (FAA)
        for arsenic, cadmium, lead,  selenium,  and  thallium:

        Shake the sample,  and transfer 100  ml  to a 250-mL beaker.  Add
        1 ml 50% HN03 and  2 ml  30*  H202.  Cover  with  a watch
        glass and heat for 2 hours  at  95*C,  making sure the  sample
        does not boil.  Cool the  sample and  filter it, and bring back
        to 100 ml with reagent  water.   The  sample  is  now ready for
        analysis.

     o  For water samples  analyzed  by  ICP,  and FAA analysis  for
        antimony:

        Shake the sample  and transfer  100 ml to  a 250-mL beaker.  Add
        2 ml 50* HN03 and  10 ml 50% HC1.  Heat on  a steam bath or
        hot plate until the volume  has been  reduced to 25% to 50% of
        the original volume, without boiling.   Cool the sample and
        filter it,  and bring, it back to 100 ml with reagent  water.
        The sample  is now  ready for analysis.

     o  For water samples  analyzed  for mercury,  using cold vapor
        atomic absorption  spectrophotometry (CVAA):

        Shake the sample  and transfer  100 ml to  a 300-mL BOD bottle.
        Add 5 ml 0.5N ^$04 and mix.  Add 2.5  ml concentrated
        nitric acid  and mix.  Add 15 ml 5%  potassium permanganate
        solution, or more  if the  purple color  discharges.  Add 8 ml 5%
        potassium persulfate solution, and  heat  the bottle to 95*C for
        two hours 1n a water bath.   At the  end of the digestion
        period, cool and  add 6  ml of 12% sodium  chloride/hydroxylamine
        sulfate solution  to reduce  excess  permanganate.  Wait  at least
        30 seconds,  then  add 5  ml stannous  sulfate and immediately
        analyze.

     o  For sediment samples  analyzed  for  all  metals except mercury:
                                   4-10
•ecvciec z'ase-

-------
                           Table  4-6

         SUMMARY  OF  CONTRACT-REQUIRED DETECTION LIMITS
Element
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thalliui
Vanadium
Zinc
Cyanide
CROC
Soil
(ntg/kg)
—
12
2
~
1
1
—
2
—
5
—
1
—
—
0.04
8
—
1
2
—
2
—
4
25
CROL
Water
(ug/1)
200
60
10
200
5
5
5,000
10
50
25
100
5
5,000
15
0.2
40
5,000
5
10
5,000
10
50
20
10
Methods
(soil and
water)
ICP
FAA
FAA
ICP
ICP
FAA
ICP
ICP
ICP
ICP
ICP
FAA
ICP
ICP
CVAA
ICP
ICP
FAA
ICP
ICP
FAA
ICP
ICP
Color
Note:    COLs are beat achievable and will vary according to
         concentration and variations in the  respective matrix.

         ICP  = inductively-coupled plasma apecroscopy
         FAA  : furnace atomic absorption spectrophotometry
         CVAA = cold vapor atomic absorption  spectrophotometry
                            4-9

-------
         minutes.   Cool  and add 6 ml 12% sodium chloride/hydroxylamine
         sulfate solution  to  reduce  the  excess permanganate.   Add  55  ml
         reagent water.  Add  5 ml stannous sulfate (6.3)  and  immed-
         iately analyze.

      o   For  percent  solids—soils,  sediments, sludges:

         Transfer  a representative portion of  the  sample  to a tared
         weighing  dish.  Weigh and record weight.   Place  dish,  sample,
         and  tilted cover  in  drying  oven at 103* to  105"C.  Cool sample
         in desiccator  and weigh.   Repeat process  until constant weight
         is attained.   Record each weight, and calculate  percent
         solids.   Do  not analyze  sample.

      Sample  digestates were  analyzed  by ICP,  FAA, or  CVAA as indicated
on Table 4-6.   The following QA/QC  was  performed:   initial calibration
and  calibration  verification,  continuing calibration  verification,
preparation  blank  analysis,  interference check sample analysis,  ICP
serial  dilution  analysis,  matrix  spike  analysis,  duplicate sample
analysis, furnace  AA QC analysis,  and laboratory  QC sample analysis.
Sediment, soil,  and  sludge samples  were also  analyzed for moisture
content, and metals  content  will  be reported  on a dry-weight basis.
      It  is permissible to  use ICP procedures  for  analysis when the
CRDL cannot  be  met,  provided that the actual  sample level is at least
twice the detection  limit  for  the ICP analysis.   As an example, for
lead in  water:   CRDL is 5  ug/L;  ICP detection limit is 40 ug/L; sample
value is 90 ug/L.  If the  sample  is less than 80  ug/L, it must be
analyzed by FAA.

4.2.2  Reporting  and Quality Assurance
      Reporting  procedures  for  this  project  were as  required:  either  a
simple data tabulation, or a  full-scale CLP data  package was  prepared
according to the procedures  in the  relevant statements of work.   In
each case,  the report included details  on QA/QC procedures and re-
sults.  All data are submitted in the Appendix of this summary docu-
ment.  Duplicate and blank samples  from the field were submitted  blind
                                  4-12

-------
    Add 1.0 g homogenized  sample  to  a conical  beaker.   Add  10  ml
    50% HN03, mix  and  cover  with  a watch  glass.   Reflux the
    sample  at 95*C  for  10  minutes.   Allow  the  sample to cool,  and
    then add 5 ml  concentrated  nitric acid and reflux  for 30 min-
    utes.   Do not  allow  total volume  to be reduced to  less  than
    5  ml_.   Again cool  the  sample,  and add  2 ml reagent  water and
    3  ml 30% H202.   Warm gently until  effervescence begins,
    and then wait  until  it subsides.   Cool  the beaker.   Continue
    to add  30% H202  in 1 ml  aliquots  until  either there is  no
    further  effervescence, or until  a total of 10 ml has been
    added.   Then:

    For ICP  analysis; and  FAA analysis for antimony:

    Add  5 ml  50% HC1 and 10 ml  reagent water.   Return the covered
    beaker  to  the hot plate  and heat  for  an additional  ten  min-
    utes.  After cooling,  filter through a Whatman #42  filter  and
    dilute  the digestate to  100 ml with reagent  water.   Dilute the
    digestate  1:1 (200 mL  final  volume) with reagent water.

    For  FAA  analysis of  arsenic, cadmium,  lead,  selenium, and
    thallium:

    Do  not  add  the reagents  specified above.   Rather,  continue
    heating the digestate  until  the volume has been reduced to
    about 2 ml.  Then add  10 ml reagent water  and warm  the  mix-
    ture.  Cool and filter through a  Whatman #42 filter paper, and
    dilute to  100 ml with  reagent  water.   Dilute the digestate 1:1
    (200 ml final volume) with reagant water.

o   For  sediment samples analyzed  for mercury:

   Weigh 0.2  g sample into  a BOD  bottle.   Add 5 ml 0.5N H2S04
    and 2.5 ml concentrated nitric acid.   Heat for two  minutes at
    95*C in  a  water bath.  Cool,  add  50 mL reagent water, 15 ml
    5% potassium permanganate solution, and 8  mL 5% potassium
    persulfate  solution.   Mix thoroughly  and heat to 95*C  for  30
                              4-11

-------
4.2.3  Analytical  Quality Assurance Results and Discussions
     USEPA  Contract  Laboratory  Program  (CLP)  procedures were used to
analyze  all  samples  where applicable.   These  analytical procedures
include  a specified  level  of  QC analyses,  and limits to which such
analyses  should  conform.   In  addition,  E & E's own QA/QC procedures
were superimposed  where  necessary onto  CLP QA/QC procedures to provide
an  added  level  of  assurance.

4.2.3.1  Organic Analyses
     For organic analyses by  GC/MS, the CLP-required QA/QC procedures
.can be summarized  as  follows:

     o   Instrument calibration  at five  concentration levels;

     o  Daily certification of  instrument  tune;

     o  Daily verification of  initial  five-point calibration;

     o  For  each sample,  verification  of extraction and analysis
        recovery through  use  of surrogate  standards;

     o  For  each sample,  quantification of found contaminants and
        surrogate  compounds by  internal  standard procedure;

     o  For  each found contaminant,  examination of the  mass spectrum
        against  a  laboratory-generated  standard mass spectrum to
        verify identification;

     o  For  each batch of samples,  analysis of two sample aliquots
        identically  spiked with specified  compounds for precision and
        accuracy assurance; and,

     o  For  specified samples  in  this  project, reporting in standard
        format all samples, quality control  samples, quality control
        summaries, calibration  information, and mass spectra.
                                   4-14

-------
to the laboratories for analysis.   For this project, in general, there
was-good agreement between  field duplicate samples, and negligible
contamination of blanks.  This  confirms that field procedures were
well in control, and that laboratory performance was of the required
standard.  In addition,  the laboratory added to the sample batch
spiked samples,  replicates,  standards, and method blanks at a fre-
quency specified in the statements  of works in order to provide con-
tinuing and real-time information on data quality.  All percent dif-
ferences were within the 95% confidence intervals and fell within EPA
guidelines.  The spike sample provided by the EPA (EPA-1) was clean
for all parameters.  For organic analyses, surrogate recoveries must
be within specified limits  for  the  extraction and analysis to be con-
sidered valid.  All percent recoveries for spiked organic samples were
well within ranges specified in EPA CLP protocols.  Percent recoveries
of less than 50t for pentachlorophenol (36X) and 4-nitrophenol  (28t)
(Appendix 8) were normal  for these  compounds, the acceptable range
being between 10 and 100 percent.   This wide range reflects the
inherent difficulty in recovery of  these compounds under standard
laboratory analyses.  All furnance  atomic  absorption samples are
spiked at least  once with a specified  level of analyte  to guard
against matrix interference.  If recovery  is not within the range  of
85% to 115X, the method of  standard addition must be employed.
     Deviations  from the standard detection  limits  as  required  by  the
QA plan were a function of  several  variables.  Method  detection limits
reflect perfect  conditions  using clean samples for  analyses.   Because
these conditions do not usually exist, detection  limits can  vary from
the normal CDL value.  Matrix effects  can  interfere with limits,  as
they represent compounds existing within the analyzed  medium that
behave in a similar manner  to the  compound of  interest.  As  such,  they
may interfere with absorption and make interpretation  more difficult.
Similarly, high concentrations of  a substance can limit the volume
used for analysis and may require  subsequent dilution.  This would
alter the detection  limit as well.
                                 4-13

-------
4.2.3.2  Inorganic Analyses
     Metals analyses were conducted using  atomic  absorption  spectro-
photometry (AAS) or inductively coupled  argon  plasma  emission  spectro-
photometry (ICP), as required under CLP  protocols  and as  necessary to
achieve contract detection limits.  CLP  QA/QC  requirements  are
summarized below.

     o  Instruments must be calibrated  initially  at  three levels (AAS)
        or two levels (ICP).  The calibration  must be verified by
        analysis of a solution  independently prepared from  alternate
        stock standards.

     o  At the beginning and end of every  analytical  run, a linear
        range verification standard must be  run.   This standard
        defines  the upper limit of  the  calibration  range  and analyses
        beyond this range can not be  reported. This  standard  must
        read within 5«  of true  value.   A low standard at  twice the
        Contract Required Detection Limit  (CRDL)  must read  between IX
        CRDL and 3X CRDL.

     o  A mid-range standard at the beginning and end of  the analyti-
        cal run, and at a frequency of  10% during the run,  must read
        with 10X of true value  (20X for mercury).

     o  A preparation blank can not be  digested for  each  batch of 20
        samples  and must show  no more than CRDL of each metal.

     o  For ICP  analysis, an Interference  Check Sample (ICS) must be
        run at  the beginning  and end  of each analytical run.  Results
        for all  included elements must  agree to with +20% of true
        value.

     o  One sample  in each  batch  of 20  must be spiked before digestion
        with all analytes of  interest at specified levels.  All  spikes
        must be  recovered between  75% and  125X: for  any  analyte  that
        is not  recovered within these limits, associated sample
        results  must  be flagged with  the letter R.   An exception  to
        this rule  is  allowed when  the native  sample  concentration  is

                                   4-16

-------
Twelve  samples were  analyzed for organic compounds  as E i E job  number
U-23'87  and reported  with a full CLP-type data package on November 8,
1985.   Quality control results  are discussed below.
     Surrogate recoveries were  within CLP specified  limits, with two
exceptions.  Sample  FRW-01 (E & E number 85-6629) showed toluene-08
recovery of 114% against an allowable range of 88%  to 110%.  No  HSL
compounds were found  in the volatile fraction of this sample, with the
exception of acetone, 2-butanone, and 1,1,1-trichloroethane, which
were attributed to laboratory contamination.  The sample was not re-
analyzed, as the effect of the  high recovery of toluene would be to
increase the apparent concentration of contaminant  compounds.  Sample
DSW-02  showed low recoveries of nitrobenzene-05 and 2-fluoro-biphenyl
surrogates in the semivolatile  fraction.  The sample was therefore
reextracted and reanalyzed and  surrogate recoveries were as a whole
acceptable.  (Nitrobenzene-05 was still low, at 34%, against  a per-
mitted  range of 35-114%, but CLP procedures allow one surrogate  in  the
semivolatiles fraction to be out of range.)  Matrix spike  analyses  in
duplicate for all compounds were within CLP target  values.
(1,1-dichloroethene  was not used in the matrix  spike solution  for
volatiles, since at  that time we were not able  to obtain a  pure
standard in an appropriate solvent from USEPA.  This was noted  in  the
case narrative for this batch of samples.)  Reagent blank  analysis
results for organics  were within allowable contamination  limits, with
the exception of the  result for 2-butanone (which we have  attributed
to the  concurrent building construction)  in the volatiles  samples.
GC/MS tuning met criteria in all instances.  Calibration criteria for
both the five-point  initial calibration and the daily  single-point
verification were met, with one exception.  Vinyl chloride exhibited a
percent difference of 27.5% (25% is  allowable)  between  the initial
five- point mean response factor and the  daily  verification response
factor  on 27 September 1985.  This was  noted  in the case narrative and
it was  determined that this discrepancy had no  analytical
significance, since  vinyl chloride was  not detected in  any sample.
     Similar criteria and similar  standards of  performance to cri-
teria applied to all  organic  analyses  conducted under this contract.
                                  4-15

-------
     Other samples  analyzed  and  reported  under  this  contract met simi-
lar criteria of quality.

4.2.3,3  Data Reporting
     For a full QA  analysis  of data  generated  using  the CLP  protocols,
we recommend that a full data package  to  CLP  specifications  should be
required.  This contains all supporting QA/QC  and  calibration informa-
tion, and facilitates proper assessment by FDER.
                                   4-18

-------
         four  (or  more) times  the  spike  amount.   In this case, sample
         results need not be flagged.

     o   One sample  in each batch  of twenty must  be analyzed  in dupli-
         cate.  Relative percent difference (RPD) between these
         analyses  must be 20%  or less where sample values are 5X CRDL
         or more.  If one or both  sample values are less than 5X CRDL,
         then  the  values must  agree to within ^CRDL.

     o   Furnace AAS procedures require particular QC analyses.  Each
         sample will be injected in duplicate.  In addition,  each
         sample digestate will also be spiked and analyzed similarly in
         duplicate.  Spike recovery must be in the range 85% to 115%,
         or multiple standard  addition (MSA) will be required for
         quantification.

Samples  analyzed  for antimony, cadmium, and lead as E & E job number
U-2571 were analyzed and reported with a full CLP-type data  package on
January  27, 1976.  Quality control results are discussed below.   Meth-
od blanks showed  all three elements not detectable (i.e., 
-------
system by the Heavy Metals Task  Force  do  not  reveal  any  significant
trends that would  indicate an  influence from  the  Sapp  Battery  Site.
     In general, there  are three major areas  of  soil contamination  at
the site extending to a depth  of 10 feet:   (1) along the  west  bank of
the West Swamp; (2) in  the area  immediately northeast  of  the plant
foundation; and (3) in  the Northwest Landfill  area.
     The swamp sediments which exhibit contamination are  primarily  at
shallow depths in the southern portion of the  West Swamp.   In  general,
lead concentrations in  these sediments taper  off  to  low  levels toward
the northern West Swamp and East Swamp areas.
     As a result of poor waste management practices, resulting in
soils contamination, and the complex hydrogeology at the  site, ground-
water from the surficial, intermediate, and Floridan aquifer systems
shows varying degrees of lead  pollution.  In  essence,  the  highest
groundwater contamination reflects the three  contaminated  soil  areas
in the western half of the the site, identified above.  Contamination
of the deeper aquifer results  primarily from:

     o  Stratigraphic variations common to  this region of  Florida
        (i.e., karst terrain and paleo-stream  channels);

     o  A high vertical  hydraulic gradient  between the shallow and
        deep aquifers; and

    •o  Historical  on-site pumping of the Sapp Battery plant well.

In addition, lateral  waste migration is enhanced  by the fact that:

     o  The surficial  aquifer  flows generally  in  an eastward direction
        at  a very slow rate;

     o  The intermediate aquifer flows southwestward at a  slow rate;
        and

     o  The  Floridan aquifer  flows eastward at a  relatively fast
        rate.
                                5-2

-------
                           5.  CONCLUSIONS
     The results of this investigation as well as the results of pre-
vious  investigations reveal significant lead contamination and the
presence of several trace metals in surface water, groundwater, sedi-
ment,  and soil in the vicinity of the Sapp Battery site.  This contam-
ination is the direct result of poor waste management practices by  the
now-defunct Sapp Battery Company.
     Surface water and surface water sediment samples selected by FSU
in the regional vicinity downgradient of the Sapp Battery site in
general show lead contamination which decreases substantially with
increased distance from the site, and decreases with time.
     Biologic samples collected during the FSU investigation revealed
the following:

     o  Algae species showed no pattern in diversity or evenness;

     o  Macroinvertebrates commonly exhibited a gradient response to
        the distribution of metals, and

     o  Fish species exhibited a gradient response to the contami-
        nation distribution found in surface water and  surface water
        sediments.

     Additional surface water, surface water sediment,  and  fish
samples collected from a sampling network within  the Chipola River
                                  5-1

-------
      By inputting  detailed  physical  and  chemical  data into  a computer
 model",  the  lead migration was  simulated  and  predictions  were made  for
 one  and five  years from  the date  of  sample collection.   The  simula-
 tion,  in  general,  showed that  the waste  front  is  migrating very  slowly
 in the  surficial  and  intermediate systems.   However,  because of  the
 high  flow velocity within the  Floridan aquifer, lead  migration will
 extend  considerably farther to  the east  of the  abandoned Sapp Battery
 operation in  excess of five years from the present time.  Furthermore,
 residential wells  immediately  east of the site  are presently exhibit-
 ing minor lead contamination effects.  Although this  simulation  pro-
 vides  lead migration  trends in  the hydrogeologic  regime, several
 assumptions had to  be applied,  resulting only  in  a qualitative over-
 view.
      In addition to the  lead migration predictions,  simulations  were
 performed to  determine how  pumping would affect contamination in the
 Floridan  aquifer.  The pumping  simulations showed that the majority  of
 the contamination  could be  removed from  the  aquifer  in about:
     o
     o
5 years at a pumping rate of 1 million gallons per day  (mgd)
7 years at a pumping rate of 0.5 mgd, or
15 vears at a oumoina rate of 0.25 mad.
     o  15 years at a pumping rate of 0.25 mgd
The concentrations of the simulated pumped water  would  in  all  cases  be
less than 1 part per million  lead  at  any given  time.
     A preliminary fixation study demonstrated  that the transport of
lead from the soils into the  groundwater may  be mitigated  by exca-
vating and solidifying the soils.  Solidification of  the soils with
defined quantities of Portland cement would reduce the  levels of lead
in the leachate to below the  detection  level  of 0.06  mg/L.
     The data presented in this  report, along with the  results of the
earlier FDER RI, are in direct support  of  the feasibility  study (FS).
These documents are intended  to  serve as the  primary  data base for the
FS report.
                                    5-3

-------
Freeze, R.A.,  and J.A. Cherry, 1979, Groundwater, Prentice-Hall,  Inc.,
     -Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.

Livingston, R.J., 1985, Field Verification of Bioassay Results  at
     Toxic Waste Sites in Three Southeastern Drainage Systems,  U.S.
     Environmental Protection Agency Report, Research and Develop-
     ment.

Moore, W.E., 1955, Geology of Jackson County, Florida, Florida  Geo-
     logical Survey Bulletin, 37, Tallahassee, Florida.

Morgan, D.S., J.I. Novoa, and A.H. Halff, 1984, Oil Sludge Solidifica-
     tion Using Cement Kiln Dust, Journal of Environmental Engi-
     neering, 110, 5.

NUS Corporation, 1983, Feasibility Study, Sapp Battery Site, Alfprd,
     Florida, EPA Work Assignment No. 17-4M17, Contract No. 68-01-
OHM Co., 1984a, Summary of Soil Excavation, Final, Sapp Battery Haz-
     ardous Waste Site.

OHM Co., 1984b, Summary Report, Technical Report, and Site-Specific
     Information, Final, Sapp Battery Hazardous Waste Site.

Prickett, T.A., T.G. Nagmik, and C.L. Lunnquist, 1981, A "Random-Walk"
     Solute Transport Model for Selected Groundwater Quality Evalua-
     tions, Illinois State Water Survey, Bulletin 65.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, April 1985, Modeling Remedial
     Actions at Uncontrolled Hazardous Waste Sites, EPA/540/
     2-85/001.

U.S. Department of the Interior, February 23, 1983, Chipola River
     Bioassay Data for Fish and Clams, to Forest Ware, Florida Fish
     and Game Commission, from Waynin Johnson, Fish and Wildlife
     Service.

U.S. Department of the Interior, May 22, 1985, Bioassay Data for Lead,
     Cadmium, and Mercury in Fish Fillets from the Chipola and
     Apolachicola River, 1983-1984, to Bruce Blachard, Director,
     Environmental Project Review, from Glen Lucero, EPA.

Vernon, R.O., and H.S. Purl, 1964, Geologic Map of Florida, Florida
     Geological Survey Map Series 18, May 1965, Tallahassee, Florida.

Watts, G.B., 1984, The Sapp Battery Site, Jackson County, Florida,
     Remedial Investigation, Final Report: Groundwater Section,
     Florida Department of Environmental Regulation, Tallahassee,
     Florida.

Yeh, G.T., and D.A. Ward, 1981, FEMWASTE; A Finite-Element Model of
     Waste Transport Through Saturated-Unsaturated Porous Media, Oak
     Ridge National Laboratory Report No. 5601.
                                  6-2

-------
                           6.  BIBLIOGRAPHY
Bear, J., 1979, Hydraulics of Groundwater, McGraw-Hill, Inc., New
     York, New York"!

Bouwer, H., and R.C. R1ce, 1976, A Slug Test for Determining Hydraulic
     Conductivity of Unconfined Aquifers with Completely or Partially
     Penetrating Wells, Water Resources Research, 12, 3:423-28.

Cooke, C.W., 1945, Geology of Florida, Florida Geological Survey Bul-
     letin, 29, Tallahassee, Florida.

ESE, Inc., February 1984, Comprehensive Feasibility Study, Task I,
     Remedial Response Objectives and Evaluation Criteria.

ESE, Inc., and OHM Co., June 1984, Initial Remedial Measures Program
     at Sapp Battery Site, Soil Sampling and Analysis.

Fetter, C.W., Jr., 1980, Applied Hydrogeology, Charles E. Merrill
     Publishing Company, Columbus, Ohio.

Florida Department of Environmental Regulation (FDER), March 30, 1983,
     Interoffice Memorandum to Victoria J. Tschinkel, Secretary, from
     Tom Savage, Water Quality Management Section.

Florida Department of Environmental Regulation (FDER), January 1984,
     Final Report Sapp Battery Site Remedial Investigation.

Florida Department of Environmental Regulation (FDER), September 17,
     1982, Interoffice Memorandum to Dr. R.H. Patten, Chemistry
     Department Administrator, from Rosemary Bottcher, special
     analytical laboratory (FDER).

Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services  (DHRS),
     November 14, 1983, Report to Victoria J. Tschinkel,  Secretary,
     FDER, from David H. Pingree, DHRS.

Franks, B.J., editor, 1982, Principal Aquifers in Florida, U.S. Geo-
     logical Survey Water-Resources Investigations Open-File Report
     82-255, Tallahassee, Florida.
                                   6-1

-------
                                            FM-2901 D1 170
                                            a
             SUMMARY REPORT ON THE
            FIELD INVESTIGATION OF THE
                SAPP BATTERY SITE,
             JACKSON COUNTY, FLORIDA

              VOLUME 2 - APPENDICES
                  November 1986
                   Prepared for:

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION
                2600 Blairstone Road
              Tallahassee, Florida 32301
     ecology and environment, inc.

     195 SUGG ROAO. P.O. BOX 0, BUFFALO. NEW YORK 14225. TEL. 718-632-4491
     International Specialists in the Environment
     recycled paper

-------
                                            FM-29Q1 01 170
                                          /fev'j*
                                            c/
             SUMMARY REPORT ON THE
            FIELD INVESTIGATION OF THE
                SAPP BATTERY SITE,
            JACKSON COUNTY, FLORIDA

              VOLUME 2 - APPENDICES
                  November 1986
                   Prepared for:

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION
                2600 Blairstone Road
              Tallahassee, Florida 32301
     ecology and environment, inc.

     195 SUGG ROAD. P.O. BOX 0, BUFFALO, NEW YORK 14225, TEL. 716432-4401
     International Specialist! in tna Environment
     recycled paper

-------
                      ;.3 -
                      «   -
                      •*«  -
                    I able Mb  lie i all m sed.i.ei.n  ami w»    taken lro«  I he L.ltU Uiy


                              Creek-Dry Creek system ove   .e sliidy  period.



                                         METALS  REPORT


                    Metals: LD-DC  Sediments  - 65   Revised  6/4/85



      ';•*•> It 10. THt blTtil.l" lllll »T H»l  Nl"ii IM.I it  j«j  -.01 «Eca*o
                      •K«*V ,     *
                                           10
                                                                               IIIU
                                                                                           gi  e»-'»-«i

                                                                                            IIIASJII  i»»ni
                                                                                     1U4
                                                                                     U4
                                                               lui
                      •"•fV.SJJi:?1}.  "•«'  "»  JU»3I
-------
             APPENDIX A

FSU SURFACE WATER AND SURFACE WATER
           SEDIMENT DATA

    (Source:  Livingston, 1985)
                A-l

-------
If A*
M"C,
MUlIl
CM.OM
                   t.to
                   2.12
                   1.10
                   t.O*
                                                                           1/1. jo
                                                                            U.*»
                                                                             !•»»
                                                                            11.15
                                                         ••"•  .
                                                         i • r • •
                                                                                     :.• i JK
r| TU

UUHIkU
CACMI"
IP»»?I


SiHi
txlOMu
                                                          AIUM4U1
                                                             lr
                                                          i
                                                         "!^ttu
                                                                          1*00.
                                                                              .00
                                                                              «C2
                                                                            1.1T
nat
Ct
   «L
  kOMlM
                coon  ITO   SUTIINI (,»

              OT-U-O*

             lit 4111*1 t»»«M
                                                        tlVfll CNI>11A
                                                        ITMl liollcMTS
                                                        SAM>li}-^lflOI 0

                                                        NfTU        HEASIME

                                                        "*ui!|»i»J*     * iiooToo*
                                                           -Ufl
                                                         CtMOIllM
"IT*L

Html MM
r •(•*!
                                                                  ;l»i  1


                                                                     •lASU«f
                                                                         tlTI.yJ
                                                                            •:fe
                                                                          "!:??
                                                                            i:ii

-------
10 tuOHtll  *tl  HOC)
                                 Itt )k


                                M4-M


                             Ul4MTf

                                 '3411
                               nlko
                               »IUP
                             HP»IUP1*
1C
                 noo:
                   }tn(tili
                                 ITt J«
                                                                                        »,««0)
                                                                       lO'OtiJ

                                                                          l*r
                                                        to
                                    t  HObl  "tlf.lM* t«inlf








                                     «.,            W«^4
                                                                         :       .
                                                                       •«••»•!         Min
                                                                     |M4*I


                                                                        (•


                                                           mCMTlt  Oil  IM01
                                                                                         ItllM
                                                                                      nni
                                                                                        »l«40)
                                   Ifc4«t  IMIftifc


                                      "-"-M!];U>r;j44i
                      It  mourn  in  iiooj   tiCciH] >il»r»
                                     jji;      .     '


                                     f|*       >      »oin,Hj;

                      M  iNOti'ii  ttt  DOOJ   TICi|J-gll4>
-------
                      r? 141


                      (•oMiiT
                                   "{ASUM
                                         It.TC
                                                             'lil
                                                             IIU1MJ*
                                                                              4lt«.CO
TI*EI


"ITAl
                                       coot i  IOT
                                   .
                                          I:!
                                                            01
                                                                                  iI»E»i  :n|>3
                                                                                  |»«i  UD MS
                                                                                  l»"»i«5-f l-i
                                                                             COOfi   101   SliMONi )»


                                                                       101  01-14-1)
                                                                                                    tt«l.
                                                                          «       :5
                                                                                  .71
                                                                                 i.ti
I
o\
• Iff** CM

SMHEi-Mftli 01-
                      •STU
    COOli

    ^c ^

Hi«tU«E
                  414..
             «      1.0
                     •I8

                    «:l|
                   11.to
                                                            01
                      Ifft
                      !*N»

                      "IT41
                      1(40
                 COOEl   140   STlIIONi  0*


              'oi-Z*-t!
                                           .»*
                                                                                  • IVEII  :-«i»ji»    coon   i*»
                                                             IVEII  :-«i»
                                                             t'll  siOM
                                                                                  "CIU
                                                                                               NEASUIE  t*»*l


                                                                                                   10010.00~~
                                                                                   !!••                71. 1*
                                                                                   tine          «      I. to
                                                                                   «ic«ii               i.M
                                                                                   ctaoniut             f.i*
                                                                                                                        It
                                                            JJji,r,ltl.f?TV



                                                            HE 141



                                                             CAOlIlM
                                                                                                   COOEl
                                                                                                               IIAflONi  OT
                                                                                                    It 10. 00
                                                                                                        .01
                                                                                                       i.3i
                                                                                   l i*e                 } . Jo
                                                                                   IlHC          <      l.-O
                                                                                   NICKEL               J.il
                                                                                   CHOHIUI             J.»»
                      lir
                                       COOcl   110  S?4tt3
-------
•o iMciiTi!   i»   noo:   'if.;*:
               t:'
I*
                 octi
             it   1 1003
io;»

I?'!
              II-
                 00*1
            ««   11003
                 ll
               i'-'
               o-octi
vt ifcoriTis   t«   11003
               0*t
                M>
'1S?J

                                 IllAII
                                  IT UK
               ?••
                                  i"M

                               vniwoT]
ic iHOfiTit   i«   11003   »n'«ih5
                                                          TO
                                                                      0»    11003
                                                                                       »|H 3
                                                                                          MUbO* >
                                                          10  iHOHVlf   It    «H03
                                                                         00*1

                                                                         l!-t
li:MM   '
                                                                                               T11
                                                                        IN44I



                                                             I«OI1'I I   (•    IN03
                                                          00
                                                          «0
                                                                                             mi-
                                                                           »»-to-tt

                                                                       •«    11003
                                                                          H-'1
                                                                                          wnt unit
              I*"
              B0-0»«1
             <«.41 !*rt«?.

                »i-«c-tt mi-i j-g
                        Sl^i^lO3'
            »«   HCO:   TIC «:».:'
                                                          10
                                                                          fftCCC
                                                                    tlK ?•.•!?]>  i KM
                                                             noo:   T-t<;-5 •»»*:•

-------
                                                                                           oo
                                                                                            I
                                                                                           et
                                                                                                 1
                                                                                                 ».
         re-I
         tft
         «<•
         !•*
         oo-
                       "
  HI
tr. i no*
IMOIIflt  161  1100)
                                                           •!»• ••*
                                                          It it-VM




                                                           HOC 3   »
                                                                         mil
                                                                         «»ii
                                                       _"£!——
                                                       '"jj-iru;;.
                                             10 ihOII'lt  I»1  11003   «U
-------
It
r>
 J

 s-
  MtD

.  "*:,
                     «CV.;.r
                    l.l?
                    1.30
                     • »*
       CM:»TKI   COOki   UI

}I«»llD-f ItlSi 01-II-.0*

(•Mil.        ittluM I»>M

• lU-IMoi""   " MJliT}!""
tti^jim              .'t
CO»»IO


»ii«fi
Ci40tlu<



ki«««i
                                                        01
                                      !*.»»



                                    caoii   ITS   SKIIJ^I 01
                   itunlxui
                                    }!)>.}t
                    >.}t
                     .1}
                    ».!'

                   «)•?•
                    1.50
                    1.30
                    ».*«
                   • Kill  CHI*)Lt   COOH   l«l
•Sltl


rioii
                                «<«iu*t  irrnl
lit*               10.!0

 1                  I »*






 if'fi ifrlnfNll
 twil»-r|!l0>
                   niu
                                        i»riu
                                       ,
                                .      !:
                     .SiU            .:5i
                                           »00
                   l»»0
                   M"C
                     .0*

                    ,'iS
                    ?•!!
                    I.O
                                                                               lit!
                                                                                                  l.ll
                                                                                            Ot-U-ll
                                                           •IUI


                                                            Ctoxluil


                                                            'I?'.

                                                            CiUoKiui
                                                                              ll»li  i
                                                                              •i iti
                                                                                                   .OO
                                                                                                   .01
                                                                                                   .10
                                                                                                   .ii
                                                                                         'xf}
                                                                                i.it



                                                                            CJOli   ITT   tllllOii J»

                                                                           l-l>-l»

                                                                                i»rm
                                                            AlunlHJil
                                                            C ton I HI
                                                            CJ»»I«

                                                            Itf
 141.00
    .0*
                                                                                                   :
                                                                                                   .{i
                                                                              tlvfli   HI>Olt   COOii  1*1
                                                                                                                   o*
                                                                              <<[IU
                                                                               OOtlUll
                                                                               cnrrtt
                                                                               ti to
                                                                               tlN(
                                                                               MUlfl
                                                                               CHOOtlUN
                                                                        •usual	

                                                                        '  "»»o..?-

                                                                                 .>«
                                                                                 .0%
                                                                                ).
                                                                                5.
                                                                                (.Of
                                                                                1. 01
                                                                                ».10
                                                                                     ;HI»J
                                                                                              COOli  !••  SltTlOm OT
                                                                              Hi Itl
                                                            CtOHllM
                                                            CO*>I4
                                                             1 tO
                                                              ent I
                                                                        •ItiUti_

                                                                        -  "»«:•$•
                                                                                 .01
                                                                         .      ?:i!
                                                                                >:tt
                                                                                     :x:»jii   coon  i»»  II*IIONI tt
                                                                                           KltjUlf
                                                            C0>'<4
                                                            tiiD
                                                            line
                                                            sIKIl
ItOt.OO
    .11
   J.JJ
  Jl.10
   i.£o
   l.r)

-------
oi-v

"*f! ?»•." r ^i! T^ r *sii TS." r *5§
i ::.*. i xi i :;.*
5-* sr£ s-S
ic 7««» ie T»« ic T»"
Bcu 1C — e )<• * o
}•>»• ••>»« !•» .« 0
1 •» | | w I | m
Oo» 1 V m OOWOO*v 1 « •» *»fw.»»vwt» 1 « w •••'••i»»»*»«o
— jj jj ^ ^jj •irui""ra
to
•4
to>
f
ac ic** c ^c i If* v act ic<* c ac
a *»x ^ a i *»x a a i *>•! a a
0 ^ 0 r- 9 •-
t*«.to i a •• to ta»>»
^ •>»••' |M fs#w v> <>«•
C i »« * C I »rt e i »f*
J» fw U 1 «• to> O * PI* t,
m M |m » O H* ^ e
— * 1 1 * ' *•*
po» v oooooo«t * •.»»>. n»*>»o * w»«wvwMiw*e
~-Oj, — ,, J ,» ~ ..«,«.».
to to
! ?
W P>

» t
i "-C
" *
a " M
8
to *••>•
»•
wft
»*
a cto
to ^
- **
* #w
*v M
«•
to
a
w

Q>"*O • » t 1 to *"•*• o *'"^ * J a 1 to
r ;fii' i^: r '"slT
« J ^C" J a I
* S£ 1"
i i-S IS
" r 2 j~
0-tw*°'K'|« :; "-^'"jj
w
£rx»?oc|» i~» *ys{t'/I!?
aw •<— i f>. . jijj . — i
c^ "jici jw" i- 5w i
A M 1 4<«1 a M 1
1 k-«— 1
o *•
I 3 -• » i a
* 1 » 0- 1 »
1 v «•>• I v
ic i »*•» i e
15 3 g 12
!- i r i.
l«~«~.j, ~ »«,. .,0^
w

-------
«t
tt
                    IIT« «'«»n
            tti  nonl   TIC/IN:
                •uo:
•I
 8t«
 «•
                 or
                knt.
                             mi
«1I   HOOD  «



  !i:

  I:       '
to i*CllflS   III  1100}   T1t     tniflitntf
                                                   111   i IOC? "«UclM3 lll«M



                                                     It I          WII»0*M)


                                                     «{ II             fl»:^
                                                       ?l       >      C44C)
                                                       I             knNOf)
                                                     ot       >    Momumi
                                                    „.____—       ijns
                                                                         ?!»• »»•«*•
                                                                   I!!
                                                                   M! I M0>li)
                                                                     1?»3|H
                                                      lk«4l IMI?*iM

                                                        t«-t«-i« in^'«-«

                                         la i-ciitu  u    narj I"i04**3
                                                                                                        o<
                           sUi,'/  --Tn
                                                 It
                                                     it
                                                             1 1")
                                        S1VX3M

-------
                                 2I-V


I?!
                     Is;    s

                  m  *    +^-   *«* I   m

                  TS-    S     *S|   TS,
                  »»*           I   T?.
                         ir
                         •**
                         •>•*"
                         S
                                   !J
   '^ J
   • •
   ii
s :-s
• T S
                                 .ri
-15   ..,
I •* f     •*!
                                                       •
                                               rvss ?  j;s,    J"«'«t'<-
                                                     -  -
                            *»^*iM
-------
»r
                 --   .-
                    r'lt- i?««ns  1)4
                uoc3   titcix: itM
              to-
              ri-

              K
              IS
If mCMMt  14   HOC
                    • U««
                    :   ti
              llll—_ _     kfnlnnif^

            *Tk44l 11-njTJH        1THII



zr  tucnvu  nz  i joe?  fio4iM: iiMi*



              10*
                                         »«
                                                                     Zf
                                                                     if
                                                                     10'
                                                                     If
                                                        M-II-J

                                         10  IHCIKII  tit   11005
                                                                     ir-
                                                                     0>'
                                                      »• 441 -:>0t»>ll


                                                          "  f>|T> »*li"l
                                                     }ii  not:   «-C*:M: i
                                                       ??:      :     "\ft\\
                                                       !?•'»               fcM
                                                        J:      *      .JKftj
                                                       ft'!           kiwUm*
                                                                         mi*
                                                                      wiiMOrtti
                                                                        '•UK
                                         «0  IMCI1T1I  0*2   l 100)   HC.IHJ
tf
zo*       »
»o*       >
tc-
t»-i
lo°'.       :
it-
                i>ec:
                                                                     IP'
                                                                     •CM
                                                                           • il«* tfM1>  I)
                                                       TO ikoii'ij  (i   nocS   «U<:H: n-1
              fC'
              oo*
              *!*
              »?•
              lo*
              ti-
                                vi ;•
                                                                   Ik44l XfllTik
                                                       :- i«tf•-.:
                                                                                  •••:
              ri-
              Cf
                                >«! i
                                0111
                                                        IJ"
                                                        if
                                                        Ir-
                                                        it •
                                                                                        0»31

-------
00
              !*:
              to*
              ft*            «iiii»ni»_
            "TkJ*i~lMi»Tii    *    mm
             HI   noo
         si:

         ~~T

JilfH  «=»«KJ l]«t
   tit.iM: in*!
                                  l*n
                                »»«*OJ
                               MIHOT}
                              minium*
                 tt-*i-to
                      Jii
                           i:»»nt
               Hi
               1J:
               Jf-
                             NltlVOVtO



                                 1* \


                              kflibO*}
                                                         »i mott*tf  iti  iMoi
                                                                            lint*IN

                                                                         M-'-H*i'll
                                                                       IM44I IMtVIM
                                                         It tMimt
                                                                                            un i*

                                                                                           l*Ui
                                                                                          >•!«(«
                                                                                           1*114



                                                                                           1><»1
                                                                   »I««OJ


                                                                    MUM


                                                                    "i™
                                                                           IT_

                                                                      n**"*!"^*7^


                                                                '::.  ill  «-iri   -II-IH':"I»|»I i
                »•-»»-10 ll>11M*t
                     lilt*  i-Moi  'l<'i
10 iHOii*is   tit   uoc3   »Ufin:  ii»«i»
               fo*
               «{•«
                                   :tw
                                  }Ht]
                                  OT]]
                                .f.«oi
                               bxiuor)
10 >Mbiivit  (oi  ;ico:   .T-'M;



               »1-       >     hAlNOPO
                                                                                         I l|kl «>
                                                                                  1  ";l »-,' 1.  »
                                                         «• IHOJtl*if
                                                                           IMOJ
                                                                            i«n(*fn
                                                                                           in. .
                                                                         «o-oo-fj  imjii-9i'1<-»
                                                                              l?ifp  «-•:"'  •:••
                                                                     v--   •;?•)?   • ic«i-3  «,*• •




                                                                        Hi
                                                                         f»-f

-------
Mi:
••irmi
CN«ON|IM
                     .III
                     .  1
                     • c»
                     .tt
141-Kl

Ml 41
            w
                  OM.
 (4*         *        II


CMionkiM     *      lltl



 ivlti CHI'OIA   (OOI<
 f»(l SUM'* 44 If I
 AiiKfl-Hli.oi io-ii-o
Jf#?§|SW??l*4lffOM'    *'   IUII°"' *•



PCI41        Nf4IWtf
klCKl       <       ',)[
C'-.ai-rj"     •       .10
ii.fii C": • u«   c:oti    *t
*»••! ,U{ i « ••!.-
                                     01
                                       iO *»
•rt«i

~z"IJ
             •ti».«t  <»f*i

                   ~:JT
                    .:i1
                     :^
                     • *'
 !lv|ti CMt*oi4
 :Ui,w?Kr
 coon

1-10-4*
                                     01

                                    01 1) *>
Jin?
llcn'l
                     0
• IVlli CM|»01»   COOfi   »*
It'll
«4HH


f«l4l


41UHIHU1
   lli CM|»01»   COOfi
   ll  lUfcli' »*lt»
   Hffr>>l.lOI 1I-I1-**

                   ^I'M

                   *•'?
                     «Ji
                                     01

                                    01 10 •>
                                                           * i**»
                                                           nkitci
                                                           CIMOIUtIK
                                                                •• 1
                                                                .oe
                                                                .10
                                                          iiwii CKi'Ji*   capti   ««



                                                          HJI4L        KttSUK  I'm I

                                                           AIU*1HUH
                                                                                      SfAtlONI  01
                                                          MTU
                                                                       ItCiSUtt
                                                           CiDHlUll
                                                            orrit

                                                           U'S
                                                           ii«c
                                                           NIC(fL
                                                           CMOMU*
                                                          •ITU
                                                                              *.*0
                                                                        «      .02
                                                                        «      .of

                                                                              !•••
                                                                               .0*
                                                                        <      .0*
                                                                        <      .10
                                                                              IC.kO
                                                                        <       .:j
                                                                        <       .4!


                                                                        '
                                                                tut»
                                                                                      ..UI.JNI  il
                                                                   KlOi 1I-D-I*
                                                          US HI
                                                            t«0
                                                                              }.{
                                                                               .*
                                                                              ,•$
                                                                              l.i
                                                          !!«••  JHi'iiA . coon   «i
                                          tt'li tuiift  iAiii
                                          }AHHU-MilOi  li-ll-i
                                                              **
                                                                               •{?
                                                                               'it

-------
9T-V

-------
MVEIi CHl'OlA   C30t*i :••:•• i
                           jo- <.i
                                    -Jf-li-J*
                                          •a
                                                                                                              ;.:;  .1  ii
                                                                                  AIJ1|«.|«            1.33
I
*—•
en
cSSflr
1-41
                  00ft  1T4  StAIIONI 0*

                  l»-ll

             Mi AS Ml l»»«ll
                           r»?![.fA.Til»..,
                                                                                  !*f*l.C.!*lf)>-A ..COOfl  111  STAIIONI  01
                                               !I»i
                                               d
I  JUI»;T  VATEi
 	      »«-«»-»»
                                                                                HtfU

                                                                                 ttunlxuii
                                                                                 CA6MIIM
                                                                                 CHtON
                                                                                      IUK
                                                                                                      .00
                     •>
-------
2
C
0.
s
                      >  -  -  • • "JI.B
                        «*•  rr.i;;iM  ;i  i'^;<;
                                                ii'.$  in. I  ;:  . i, *(( - ,c.
              :,:••• ' * a ?  *
             •«•».!.-•«.:..•«
             >f;«.         *i
           !.i-1«tiii^i  €>-.•••.-»»   *•"
                                    • ri
                                                                                   I."J«: Cl
                                                                                    •lK| J
                                                                                                    .00
                                                                                                    . f.O
          I
         »—•
         ~»J
i    .-.>::   _ :. •
•  .. -.• i -r.''.. •  i  : i'..
•• •  .'• !  I • • - I
                                                                                                    .,-3
                                                                                                    .01
             !'.-•> :HI»;.»   :-(:i   t-i   'ii•
             !«••:  »:;;.'  ;i :ij:»  «i:  j;  s-i:
             '...  t -fjit^ • *»•£*-*<  tii;7^lAi»
             » : I 4.         ».».'..••:  I ' ' -I
                                 II.'^0

-------
               APPENDIX  B

PRIORITY  POLLUTANT CONFIRMATION STUDY
            ANALYTICAL DATA
                   B-l
                                              nl*i*» mid i-fi* ir«»ii(ii*

-------
 ecology  and environment, inc.
  ANALYTICAL SIBVtCU CENTiB P 0 BOX 0. BUFFALO. NEW YORK 14225, TEL 716-631-0360
  lnt»rn»(»on»l Sp»ct«it»ti in the Environmental Scwncn
DATE:  November 8, 1985
TO:  Florida Department of Environmental  Regulation
     Job No. U-2387
                            Case Narrative


General

Enclosed are the analytical  results for case no.  U-2387.   All  samples
were received in good condition on September 21,  1985.


Volatiles

Vinyl acetate was not present in the calibration  standard  because  we
have been unable to obtain a pure standard from USEPA.   It was not
detected in any sample.  For the same reason, 1,1-dichloroethene  was
not included in the matrix spike solution.

Vinyl chloride (ccc) exhibited a X D greater than 25X on  September 27,
1985.  Since its presence was not detected in the samples, this  has
caused no significant effect on the sample data.


Semivolatiles
Di-n-octylphthalate (ccc) exhibited X D more than 25X on October  4,
1985 and pentachlorophenol  exhibited X D more than 25X on October 7,
1985 calibration check analyses.

The semivoUtile fraction of sample DSU-02 (lab 16631) was analyzed
twice because of low surrogate recovery.  Both analysis are reported.

2-methylphenol was initially detected in sample FSW-02 (lab 16630)  but
not in the field duplicate  sample DSW-02 (lab *6631).  Because of this
discrepancy, sample FSW-02  was re-extracted and re-analyzed for the
acid phenolic compounds only.  No 2-methylphenol  was then detected,
preventing confirmation of  the compound.  Information concerning
tentatively identified compounds in sample FSW-02 was obtained from
the initial analysis of that sample.  We are currently investigating
this apparent sample contamination.
                                  B-2                                    OOO

-------
                            QA/QC SAMPLES
Laboratory QC samples are identified by the following table headings:

  Quality Control for Accuracy:  Percent Difference - EPA Quality
                                 Assurance Materials

  Quality Control for Accuracy:  Percent Recovery for Spiked Water
                                 (Soil) Samples

  Quality Control for Precision:  Results of Analysis of Replicate
                                  Water (Soil) Samples

Trip and rinsate blank samples are numbered as follows:
          Trip Blanks

             SBB01
             SBB02
             SBB03
             SBB04
             SBB05
             SBB06
             SBB07
             GWB01
             GWBB01
             GWBB02
             GWBB03
             HGWBB
Rinsate Samples

     FSR01
     FSR02
     FSR03
     FSR04
     FSR05
     FSR06
     FSR07
     FSR08
     FSR09
     FSR16
     FSR17
     FSR18
     GWR01
     GWR02
     GUR03
     GWR04
     GWR05
                                 B-l-1
   -0
                                                               unit i

-------
    ecology and environment, inc.
                        LABORATORY REPORT


                                 FOR

                           Sapp  Battery
Job No.:
Sample Date:
Date Received:
Sample Type:
E * E Lab
Number 85-
6627
6628
6629
6630
6631
6632
6633
6634
6635
6636
6637
6638
U-2387
9/19,20/85
9/21/85
Water Grab
Customer
Number
FEW 03A
FSW 01
FRW 01
FSW 02
OSW 02
FSW 03
FSW 04
FEW 03C
FEW 09C
FEW 03B8
GWR 01
GWB 01
                                         Sampled 8y:

                                         Delivered By:
                                          Cyanide
                                          mq/L

                                          <0.020
                                          <0.020
                                          <0.020
                                          <0.020
                                          <0.020
                                          <0.020
                                          <0.020
                                          <0.020
                                          <0.020
                                          <0.020
                                          <0.020
                                          <0.020
E i. E,  Inc.

Federal  Express
   Sulfate
    mg/L

     29
     24
     86
     29
     29
     66
     38
     330
     39
     2000
     1.0
     1.0
Analytical  References;
"Methods for the Chemical  Analysis  of Water  and  Wastes",  EPA-600/4- 79-020,
March 1983.
                               Supervising  Ana1yst_

                               Date:
                                   B-4

-------
A. C1 ifton
Page  2
November 8, 1985
Pesticides/PCBs

Heptachlor exhibited  a  percent  difference more than 15X on the
October 9, 1985  standard check  for  quantitation.  Oelta-BHC,
gamma-BHC, heptachlor and  endrin  exhibited a percent difference more
than 20X on the  November 1,  1985  standard check for confirmation.
Since none of these compounds -were  confirmed as being present in the
samples, the percent difference has no  significant effect on the
sample data.

If you have any  questions  on any  analyses, please contact me.

Sincerely,
Andrew P. Clifton

APC/cmp
                                   8-3
 '"O u<*vJe'                                                  i-tniim n.nl >•«•

-------
                                                    U-2387
  RESULTS OT WATER ANALYSES
FOR PRIORITY POLLUTANT METALS

    (•11 results in «g/L)
E 4 E Laboratory No.i 85-
Smple Identity
Antwony
Arsenic
Beryl liu»
detail*
Chrowiui
Cooper
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
ThalUui
Zinc
6633
FSW
04
<0.060
<0.005
<0.015
<0.001
<0.015
<0.025
0.0»
<0.0002
<0.020
<0.005
<0.005
<0.00)
0.03*
6634
FEW
03C
0.118
0.282
<0.015
0.004
<0.015
<0.025
4.96
<0.0002

-------
                                                    U-2387
  RESULTS CT WATER ANALYSES
FOR PRIORITY POLLUTANT tCTALS

    (•11 results in »g/L)
E 4 E Laboratory No.t 85-
Sanple Identity
Antimony
Arsenic
BerylUui
CadMiu*
Chrtxiui
Copper
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
ThalliuH
Zinc
6627
FEW
03A
<0.060
<0.005
<0.015
0.003
<0.015
0.119
0.609
<0.0002
0.028
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
0.160
6628
FSH
01
<0.060
<0.005
<0.015

-------
QUALITY CONTROL FOR ACCURACY:   PERCENT  RECOVERY
                FOR SPIKED MATER  SAMPLES
Analysis
Antimony
Arsenic
Cadmiun
Lead
Mercury
SelenliM
Silver
Thslliu.
Cy snide
E 4 E
Laboratory
No. 85-
6638
6638
6638
6638
6638
6638
6638
6638
6638
Origins I
Value

<60
<5
<1
".8
<0.2
<5
<5
<5
<20
Anoint
Added
(ug/L)
120
25
2.5
25
1.0
25
25
25
45
A»o
-------
                                                              U-2387
                      QUALITY CONTROL FOR PRECISION
                    RESULTS OF ANALYSIS OF REPLICATE
                       ANALYSES OF WATER SAMPLES
Element
ChroBiun
BeryUius
Copper
Nickel
Zinc
Silver
Arsenic
Antimony
Selenlusi
Thelliui
Mercury
CKtaim
Lead
Cysnlde
E & E
Laboratory
No. 85-
6631
6631
6631
6631
6631
6631
6631
6631
6631
6631
6630
6631
6631
6636
Original
Analysis
<0.015
<0.015
<0.025
0.023
<0.020
<0.005
<0.005
<0.060
<0.005
<0.005
<0.0002
<0.001
1.06
<0.020
Repllcite
Analysis
<0.015
<0.015
<0.025
<0.020
<0.020
<0.00i
<0.005
C0.060
<0.005

-------
    ecology and environment, inc.
    ixMnmenw Sc«cn*n *\ in* tnvmnmmi
                         LABORATORY REPORT

                                 FOR
                            Sapp Battery
Job No.:
Sample Date:
Date Received:
Sample Type:
*As Received
**Dry Weight
U-2392
9/20/85
9/24/85
Soil  and Water
                                         Sampled By:    E i E, Inc.
                                         Delivered By:  Federal Express
E & E Lab
Number 85-
6656
6657
6658
6659
6660
6661
6662
Customer
Number
FM Rinsate
2040
FSG 23P
FSG 54P
FSA 06P
FSA 09P
DSA 09P
FMH 20
Cyanide
mq/kg*
<0.020 mg/L
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
Water
Extractable
Sulfate
mg/kg**
1.0 mg/L
33
86
110
260
290
150
X Solids
87
97
88
87
87
74
Analytical References:
"Methods for the Chemical  Analysis of Water and Wastes", EPA-600/4-79-020,
March 1983.
"Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods,
"SW-846, Second Edition, U.S.  EPA, 1982.
                               Supervising Analyst^
                               Date:       V^K;
                                   B-10

-------
                                                              U-2387
                    QUALITY CONTROL  FOR  ACCURACY!
         PERCENT DIFFERENCE—EPA QUALITY ASSURANCE MATERIALS
Clement
Antimony
Arsenic
Beryl linn
CsdMiuM
Chro»iu»
Copper
Leed
Mercury
Nickel
Seleniue
Silver
Thsllius
Zinc
Concentrations
Known
101.5
26. 7
235
3.3
261
339
42.7
8.73
207
50.2
600
25.0
418
in wq/L
Determined
108.9
26.0
219
3.2
248
315
42.2
9.02
221
43.6
608
27.1
432
Percent
Difference
7.3
2.6
6.8
3.0
5.0
7.1
1.2
3.3
6.8
13.1
1.3
8.4
3.3
Motet  Thess results ere within the 95S confidence intervei  for  th«M
       psreaeters.
                                  B-9'

-------
                                  RCSULTS IF  SOIL  AIKLYSIS FOR PRIORITY POLLUTANT
                                             VOLATILE ORGANIC COMTOIMOS

                                     (raaulta in uo/kg • racaivad unlaaa noted)
                                                                                                             U-2392
pp»

(4V)
(6V)
(7V)
(10V)
(11V)
(13V)
(14V)
(15V)
(16V)
(19V)
(23V)
(29V)
(JOV)
(32V)
(33V)

(38V)
(44V)
(45V)
(46V)
(47V)
(48V)
(51V)
(85V)
(86V)
(87V)
(88V)

CAS*

71-43-2
56-23-5
108-90-7
10746-2
71-55-6
75-34-3
•79-00-5
79-34-5
75-00-3
110-75-8
67-46-3
75-35-4
156-60-5
78-87-5
10061-02-6
10061-01-09
100-41-4
75-09-2
74-87-3
74-83-9
75-25-2
75-27-4
124-48-1
127-18-4
108-88-3
79-01-6
75-01-4

Con pound
•catena*
banzana
carton tatracUorida
chlorobanzana
1,2-«
toli*n«*
trichlorovthan*
vinyl chlorldt
2 butvxm*4'
E ft E Lab NurtMr 85- 6656
Swplt Idwitity FM
Rinaat*
»ioA
2040
6.8
O
<3
O
<3
3.5
O
<3
O
<3
O
<3
O
<3
O
<3
O
0
<3»
O
<3
0
<3
O
<3
<3
O
<3
O
6657
FSG
23P
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
81
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
le  dattction  linit
*Coapound praaant  in  inatrmant blank
                                                           B-12

-------
                                                                                          U-2392
                                     RESULTS OF A MATCR AND SOIL ANALYSES
                                         FOR PRIORITY POLLUTANT ICTALS

                                   (rwults  in mg/kq m received unlese noted)
E a E Leboretory No.
Senple Identity
AntlMny
Arwnic
Beryl Ilia
CKtaiui
ChroBiui
Copper
lem)
Mercury
Nickel
SeleniuB
Silver
The Mil*
Zinc
: 85- 6656>
FM Rlneete
2040
<0.060
<0.005
<0.015

-------
CD

I
       3 2
              i »MOk7*n4
                     i TI
                     <«<«>»
                                                                            §
     AAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

                                       i§§§§§§§§
     AAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAA I-*
                      §§§£§
              AA,AA  AAAAA
v» >£ M» ^l~^ vj ^? ¥* ^ IB
8 S 8 8l§ 8 § | 815
                                              AAAAA
                                     ^AAA AAAAAAAAA
                                                                            A A A A
                           A A A A I-* A 1-^ AAA   AAAAAAAA
                           v/'srv'vlv/'vlty^^'l^^^^^vyrvi?
                          I §18 §l§ 8 i 8l8 S 8 g 8 8 § 8 g § § § i
                      A A A ^ A A A I-* A
                                         AAAAAAAA/


                                         ooooorSoOoooOo
                                                     /V/VAAAA/VAAA^A^AA
                                                     S'vV^-^v^vJ^iffwfiC^iCwvn
                                                            noOoOOOOw^o
                                                            3OOOOOOOOOO
                                                                                        2
                                                                                        Ul
                                                                                         r

                                                                                         s
                                                                                     1
                                                                                             w  ur i
                                                                                             I  *'
                                                                                        10  ii

                                                                                        !  h
                                                                                        S  »9
                                                                                        H-   —4

                                                                                        i   3
                                                                                            f
                                                                                            r-

                                                                                            i

-------
                                     RESULTS OF SOIL ANALYSIS FOR
                                            ACID COMPOUND

                                  (•11 results in yg/kg m received)
                                                                                                U-2392
PP t
CAS I
Coepound
                                                              6657   6658   6659   6660   6661    6662
                                                              FSC
                                                              2JP
                                                         FSG
                                                         54f
                                          FSA
                                          06P
       FSA
       09P
       OSA
       09P
       rm
       20
(21A)      88-06-2       2,4,6-trichlorophenol
(22A)      59-50-7       p-chloro-«-crMol
(24A)      95-57-8       2-chlorophenol
(J1A)      120-83-2      2,4-dicnlorophenol
(34A)      105-47-9      2,4-dlMthyl phenol
(57 A)      88-7%$       2-nitrophenol
(58A)      100-02-7      4-oitrophenol
(59A)      51-28-)       2,4-dinitrophenol
(60A)      534-52-1      4,6-4inltre-2-
-------
                                                                U-2592
                    QUALITY CONTROL FOR ACCURACY:
         PERCENT DIFFERENCE—EPA QUALITY ASSURANCE MATERIALS
Element
Antimony
Arsenic
Berylliue
Cwfciui
Chrailu*
Copper
Lead
Htrcury
Nickel
Seltnim
Silver
ThelUiw
Zinc
Concent ret lom
Known
101.5
26.7
235
3.3
261
339
42.7
8.73
207
50.2
600
25.0
418
In jjQ/L
Determined
100.1
26.0
213
3.19
266
337
42.8
9.02
202
A3. 6
608
25.6
423
Percent
01 f ference
1.4
2.6
9.4
3.3
1.9
0.6
0.2
3.3
2.4
13
1.3
2.4
1.2
Motet  Theee reeulte ere within the 95S confidence interval for theee
       pereoetere.
                                 B-16

-------
               Orq«no Chlorine Pesticides  and  PCB's - Results in ing/kg as  raceived
S«ipl* Identification
E & E l*or«tory No. 85-
Stnpl* Ovtei 9/20/85
Compound
Aldtin
•-etc
b-BHC
g-BhT
d-8HC
Chlordvw
4,»'-000
4,4'-OOE
4,4'-OOT
Oieldrin
Endosulfin I
Endo«uU«n II
Endosulf«n sulfit*
Endrin
Endrin tldanyd*
Heptaehlor
Hvptachior epoxid*
PC8 - 1016
PCS - 1221
PCS - 1232
PC8 - 1242
PC8 - 1248
PC8 - 1254
PCS - 1260
Tox»ph«n«
Endrin tetonc
mthoxycnior
FM Rinutt FSC
2040 2JP
6656* 6657

<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<1.
<1.
<1.
<0.
<0.

05
05
05
05
05
50
10
10
10
10
05
10
10
10
10
05
05
50
50
50
50
50
0
0
0
10
50

<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.

008
008
008
008
008
08
016
016
016
016
008
016
016
016
016
ooa
008
08
08
08
08
08
16
16
16
016
08
FSC
54P
6658

<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.

008
008
008
008
008
08
016
016
016
016
008
016
016
016
016
008
008
08
08
08
08
<0.08
<0.
16
<0.16
<0.
16
<0.016
<0.
08
FSA
06P
6659

<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.

008
008
008
008
008
08
016
016
016
016
008
016
016
016
016
008
008
08
08
08
08
<0.08
<0.
16
<0.16
<0.
16
<0.016
<0.08
FSA
09P
6660

<0.008
< 0.008
<0.008 .
<0.008
<0.008

-------
   ecology and environment, inc.
     rnment Sp*C**M> •*tfw Emnrorwn«m
                        LABORATORY REPORT
                                FOR
                            Sapp Battery
Job No.:        U-2388
Sample Date:     9/19,20/85
Date Received:   9/21/85
Sample Type:     Soil
Sampled  By:    E & E, Inc.
Delivered  By:  Federal Express


E & E Lab
Number 85-
6639
6640
6641
6642
6643
6644


Customer
Number
FSY 01
FMH 16
FMH 17
FMH 18
FMH 19
SBB 01


Cyanide
mg/kg*
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
NA
Water
Extractable
Sulfate
mg/kg*
25
3100
2900
830
3900
5 mg/L



X Solids
90
42
78
70
60
—
NA-not analyzed due to Insufficient  sample
*As Received
Analytical  References:
"Test Methods for Evaluating Solid  Waste, Physical/Chemical  Methods,
"SW-846,  Second Edition, U.S. EPA,  1982.
                              Supervising Analyst
         Au
                              Date:
                                  8-18
                                                                03«114

-------
                                                      U-2J92
  QUALITY CONTROL FQS PRECISION
RESULTS OF ANALYSIS OF REPLICATE
    ANALYSES (F MATER SAMPLES
Con pound
Aldrin
e-6HC
b-8HC
g,-8ht
d-8HC
CMordane
4.4--000
4,4'-OOE
4,4'-OOT
Oisldrln
Endosulfan I
Endoauifan II
CndosuHsn sulfats
Endrin
Endrin aldehyde
Hept senior
Heptachlor epoxide
PCB - 1016
PCB - 1221
PCB - 1232
PCB - 1242
PCB - 1248
PCB - 125*
PCB - 1260
Tomspnaoa
Endrin Ketone
Msthaiychlor
E 4 E
Laboratory
He. 85-
6656
66S6
6656
6656
6656
6656
6656
6656
6656
6656
6656
6656
6656
6656
6656
6656
6656
6656
6656
6656
6656
6656
6656
6656
6656
6656
6656
aa
Original
Anaiysia
<0,05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.50
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.05
<0.10

-------
                                                                                                      U-2387
                                 RESULTS OF WATER ANALYSIS FOR PRIORITY  POLLUTANT
                                             VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS

                                               (•11  results in ug/L)
pp»

(4V)
(6V)
(7V)
(10V)
(11V)
(13V)
(14V)
(15V)
(16V)
(19V)
(23V)
(29V)
(30V)
(32V)
(33V)

(38V)
(44V)
(45V)
!46V>
(47V)
(48V)
(51V)
(85V)
(86V)
(87V)
(88V)
CAS*

71-43-2
56-23-5
108-90-7
107-06-2
71-55-6
75-34-3
79-00-5
79-34-5
75-00-3
110-75-fl
67-66-3
75-35-4
156-60-5
78-87-5
10061-02-6
10061-01-05
100-41-4
75-09-2
74-87-3
74-83-9
75-25-2
75-27-4
124-48-1
127-18-4
108-88-3
79-01-6
75-01-4
Conootnd
acetone*
benzene
carbon tetrechloride
chlorobenzene
1 ,2-dichloroe thane
1 ,1 , 1-tnchloroethane*
1,1-dichloroethane
1 , 1 , 2-tr ichloroethene
1 , 1 ,2,2-tetraehloroethene
chloroetnane
2-chloroethylvinyl ether
chloroform*
1 , 1 -d ichloroethene
trene-1 ,2-d ichloroethene
1 ,2-d ichloropropene
trane-1 ,3-diehloroprooene
cie-1 , 3-d ichloropropene
ethylbeniene
methylene chloride*
chloronethane
bromonethane
bronofom
bromodichloromethane
chlorodibroMOMthane
tetrechloroethene
toluene*
tr ichloroethene
vinyl chloride
E 4 E Lib Nueber 85- 6627
FEW
Saeple Identity 03A
<3»
<3
<3
<3
<3
<3
<3
<3
<3
<3
<3
<3
<3
<3

-------
                                                                       U-2388
                     RESULTS  OF  SOIL  AND WATER  ANALYSES
                        FOR PRIORITY  POLLUTANT  *TALS


                (•11  results in ing/kg  m  received  unless  noted)
E & E Laboratory No.i 85-
Soiple Identity
Antimony
Arsenic
Beryl lius
Cadniua
ChroniiK
Copper
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
Selenim
Silver
Thalliua
Zinc
6639
FSY
01
<6.0
0.71

-------
                                                                                                         U-2387
                                 RESULTS OF WATER ANALYSIS FOR PRIORITY  POLLUTANT
                                                  ACID COMPOUNDS
                                              (•11 results in  uq/L)
PP t
            CAS *
Compound
                                                       t 4  E  Lab Nurt>er 85-   6627   4628   6629  6630   6631  6632
                                                       Saaple Identity
                                           FE»'   FSW
                                           0'\   01
                                                                                         01
            FSW
            02
            OSW   FSK
            02    03
(21A)      88-06-2       2,4,6-tnchlorophenol
(22A)      59-50-7       p-chloro-o-cresol
(24A)      95-57-8       2-chlorotfwnol
(31A)      120-83-2      2,4-dichlorophenol
(34A)      105-67-9      2,4-dwethyl phenol
(57A)      88-75-5       2-nitrophenol
(58A)      100-02-7      A-nitropn«nol
(59A)      51-28-5       2,4-dinitropfwnol
(60A)      534-52-1      4,6-dimtro-2'Mtfcylphsnal
(64A)      87-86-5       p*ntKhloroph«nol
(65A)      108-95-2      phenol
                         2-*ethyl  phenol
                                                                                   00
                                           <30
                                           OO
                                           <50
<30
<30
<50
<30
<30
<50
<30
<30
<50
<10
270
00
00
00
00
00
<30
<30
<50
00
00
00
00
oo
00
00
<30
<30
<50
00
00
                                                      B-22

-------
ZJ
__*
_J
o
1_J *—'
£1
t/1 <   **
«- 13   -<
VI E    3
^,°    g
I!)

u>
                ^ x  a
                •OU  CD
                28  S
                      §
                «»  u
                  2uj  w
                  u.  o
                •e

                u
Conpoun
                                vvvvCvvvvvvvvvvvv/^vvvvvv/vv

                                                            VVVVVVV^VVN/V/VVVVV
                                           *                                   *                  >n m v\
                             Svvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
                              — vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv

                                                 J    I
                                                 C  •    •
                                                 •o
                                                                          |
                                                                          fi.
                                   t«     C-UCMO    >>    C
                                   o     ••••-•    c    S
                                   — «     JIOCOC    -4    £
                                   C     M1.WI.U    >    M
                                   o  •  •  o • o  *    -<    c
                           •S    ?  2  I t &    €

                            5    I  5  £5 £    fc

                           i    It  &|5    -



                            OO£   »2  -Tc
                            i. »_ o—  o — •* 9
                            O  O *   •  1  I  - O
                           '^bVlllSII*'—4
wNAol   -T  -..6.coTeTci».
•  C  «• -< M  "- — — —  —•  O —« —  »«M»tl.C
O  i  • c  •••••iTc  »»•   -«.«*i||f:_
•  A  Oo"~"~*"'~—"U<^  o ^-  **  •— *J o •)  6  OJ3
                                                                                  s ?     sis    5  :
                                                                                  * §  _  -S  «! S    89
                                   • c—*  •«—* *«AIJ: • t*-*™-**"^  »«  |IAJ£  C-CX>
                             *     •»•£*-£>•  I^OOC  - JT   -ICC»*Ji-Ti«
                                 ?•    j5OAJU«2-  — T>MN4.-«t.W»-0»—  -<  >- U O  O  0  I-
                             «!«PoT.-T.  -ocpYEYc   i  >-£ o I  I  I  o
                                                                                                      -
                                                                                                      •  O
                                                                                                      o -•
5—  -"^uOOOi-"**-*
 i  >-co|IIob5o»-
«£^—.500-t^-«^c
                                                       I  o
                                                      ir» —
                                                          -.
                                                          l^>^  1  00
                                                         o  i  i M>  i
                                                                       ^  o

                                                                 ~    ri  ^  ^
                                                                  liAOo  |(Mr^O«>CM4
                                                                 a  i   *  i  "  '   <*  I'«CO«D  -  -
                                                                          —  •Ov*t-*"rf^r^  \o  r-
                                                                                   *




                                                                                   8
                                                                                                                   !
                                                                                   i!
                                                                                   b  >-
                                                                                   a  a

                                                                                   ?1
                                                                                   U
                                                                                                                                                  CO

-------
b


52
     SI/I O
     u.



z   »g












3   £E
                   es
              r"»-^»-KNr"r-»-«-»-*-»-*-»-*-t-v-»-w-*-*-»-»-*"T-»"»-r"*-»-*"^»-^^»-^^*-







                             OQOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO


                             VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVN/VX/VV     vvvvv%^vvvvvvvvvvvv
                             ooooooooooooooo
                                oooo
                                                             oooo
                                                                                       oooooooo
                                                                                                                                                    oooooooo
                             oaoooooooooooooooooooooooor^ooeo

                             vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv     vvvv
                                                                                                                                                             ooooo
                                   o o  o  o o
                                               eooooooooooooaoo^oooo
                                                                                                                                                    ooeooooo
                                                                                                                                                                                    I
                                                                                                                                                                                  •oa

-------
                                                                                                          U-2387
                                 RESULTS OF MATER ANALYSIS  FOR  PRIORITY  POLLUTANT
                                                  ACID COWOUNDS

                                              (•11 reeulte  in ug/L)
pp t
CAS f
Compound
                                                       E  & E  Lib  NtMber  85-  6633  6634  6635  6636  6637   6638
                                                       Seaple Identity
                                                                 FSN   FEW   FEN   FEW   GWR   GWB
                                                                  04   03C   09C   03BB   01    01
(21A)
(22A)
(24A)
(3IA)
(34A)
(57A)
(58A)
(59A)
(60A)
(64A)
(65A)

88-06-2
59-50-7
95-57-8
120-83-2
105-67-9
88-75-5
100-02-7
51-28-5
534-52-1
87-86-5
108-95-2

2,4,6-trichlorophenol
p-cMoro-«-cr eeo 1
2-chloropnenol
2, 4-dlchlorophenol
2,4-diMthylphenol
2-nitrophenol
4-nitrophonol
2 , 4-dinitropheno 1
4,6-dinUro-2-e*thylphenol
pentechlorophenol
phenol
2-Mrthyl phenol
00
OO
OO
00
OO
OO
OO
<30
<30
<50
OO
00
00
00
OO
OO
OO

-------
                                                                                    U-2387
              Orqanc Chlorine  Peaticidea  and PCSa - Results in ug/L
Sanple Identification FEW
OJ*
E 4 E Laboratory No. 85- 6627
Staple Date: 9/19,20/8$
Compound
Aldrin
a-8HC
b-BHC
g-8HC
d-8HC
Chlordane
4, 4' -ODD
4.4--OOE
4,4'-ODT
Oialdrin
Endosulfan I
Endoaulfan II
Cndoaulfan tuifite
Endrin
•Endrin aldetiyde
HeptacfUor
Heptachlor ipoxjfle
PCS - T016
PCS - 1221
PCS - 1232
PCS - 1242
PCS - 1248
PCS - 1254
PCS - 1260
Toxaphene
Endrin Katone
Methoxychlor

<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.50
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.05
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.05
<0.05
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50

-------
CO



 I
       **•%
       5 g°
         ,
       *o uj •**
       -C U 0
  a: in
  00

  *2
         — «

         I
         (n
  z z

  u
  a: in
pun
5«SS5S55S5855;S;55S5555S55l;555;S!5;5!555;5;5
             ooooooooooogogogogogogogogfegooogogogogog^gcjgs




             ooooooooooooooooooooooooooggooooooooooooogooo

             vvvvvvvvvvCvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv  vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv


             oooooooooaoooooooooooooooocjoogooogooogggogogo

             vCvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv/
                               £ 5 £ ?  ?
                               • «^S  5
                             ?  -i- -i|  s

                          2?3  |r?!si
                          • *M. o. £ a x -i a
                              f ? £ S
                               S-i c • • •
                               I a^ * *
 I
                                                I


                                              Kl
     II
     t» O.
     £ -^


     8 V
              •
             CM  •
             • CN
                       ' I ~ I I I
                       'r«i«rc»»
                       'T'*2~R>0
                       i 10- i l i
                       -28  l— (JN
                       S°~MC>'s'
                       K* — ». —  Si
                    —  —
eDi i I i  I
)»<• — «M
oiSSo*- —
p-  i i I i  I
                                                                  i  i
 « I I I O>

I I r» o f-  I I



— — «o to f — —
                                                                         in
                                                                         CM
                                                                         i
                                                                         oo
I


|





|

i.
a
                                                                       o
                                                                       V
                                                                                I
                                                                                o
                                                                                o

-------
                                                                                      U-2388
                       RESULTS OF SOIL ANALYSIS  FOR  PRIORITY  POLLUTANT
                                        ACID  COMPOUNDS

                              (all results  in ug/kg  ••  received)
pp »

(21A)
(22A)
(24A)
(31A)
(34A)
(57A)
(58A)
(59A)
(60A)
(64A)
(65A)

CAS *

88-06-2
59-50-7
95-57-8
120-83-2
105-67-9
88-75-5
100-02-7
51-28-5
534-52-1
87-86-5
108-95-2

Coapotnd

2,4,6-trlchloraph«nol
p-cfiloro-o-ertw 1
2-ehloreph«nol
2, 4-dichlorcphenol
2,4-diMthylptwnol
2-nitrophenol
4-nitroph»nol
2,4.dinitroph«nol
4,6-dlnitro-2-iMtriylph*nal
p«nt Khloraptenol
ptwnol
4-wthrlph*nal
6639
FSY
01
<500
<500
<500
000
<500
<500
<500
<1500
<1500
<1500
<500
<500
6640
rm
16
<500
<500
<500
<500
<500
<500
<500
<1500
<1500
<1500
<500
<500
6641
rm
17
<500
<500
<500
<500
<500
<500
<500
<1500
<1500
<500
<500
<500
6642
FW
18
<500
<500
<500
<500
<500
<500
<500
<1500
<1500
<500
<500
1100
6643
rm
19
<500
<500
<500
<500
<500
<500
<500
<1500
<1500
<500
<500
OOO
6644
SBB
01
M
NA
NA
N»
NA
Nt
NA
NA
NA
UK
NA
N»
NA - Not in«lyr«d,  irwufficient
1*.
                                          B-28

-------
a
c."
+ *
J? *">
i 1
a B
& i

t n
II
tr v
•- o
M|
£ i
i 1
3 ft
" ft
2 •
It
?
rr
I
r


CD
1
ro











OB — J ^ 'J* ••• OB ^4 O* J* fr <


\»^g«s»MvJ>v*frfrv|lj
X J» ' ' Al Al ij '
1 1 O» CD S 1 1 | | 1


t*-tO«79*i< ?•<
qra>-»-rfC-33 * 5 :
e^acioll o 9 "
^^'^'•••tQO 1<- «-k o a i* • 3 J
3 g- 3 o jr JT 1 T «• • |
*irr 3 a O § A
^i| \









l-ssssssssss,

l^ssssssasss,
l^i ^ AAA AA A AAA
i»ssssssssss
(S^A AA A AA A -A'i/i
-gg^SSSSSSS
|O»A/^AAAAAAAA
- s s| s ss s sss
ac«oocicc oo1^

D ^'K*Q^v>*>oa«kj«»^««-a^<4:
e <-c5f.«<.<<l?w'*2'*£3iI' *
fp 3 e- 9 -^aiT—oi-Sa*
oonC ^- • o • o a • n
y«yrr < nitfVffr*' J
3 o §0 f & i*m °
ll'l » iff *
'] ? S f








sssssssssssssssss'^
A
saaaaa|-ajsajsasjssi5js|*
<\AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA|O»
ssssssssssssssssslffi
AAA AA AA A/^ AA AAAAA/V I-*
sssssssssssssssssls
aaaaaa^a^aaaaaaaai?
accciGcocc;acc|*cc:c:a|<*
-a
-^



n
$
«.


F
s
i

Ul W
i o-
j—
S* ft
*
3 z
rr o1
ID
1
2-n «
4/1 O*
•< ^
-• -n o»
^ X P
* §
-i |
si |
~* 1
OP 9










s
E s
*i M
2 ^
S R|
1 |«

1 "9
n
a aa
5- 5*
ci J2*^
^ 3
r-
c
-H
3






-------
                                                                           U-2388
    Orqsno Chlorine Pestle idea snd PCB's - Results in mq/kq m received
Ssjuple Identlficstion
E & E Laboratory No. 85-
Swplt Dstet 9/19,20/85
Compound
Aldrin
•-BHC
b-BfC
g-BtC
d-BtC
Chlordsne
4,4'-000
4,4 '-OOE
4.4-.OOT
OieJdrin
Endosul fsn I
Endosul fsn II
Endosul fsn sulfste
Endrin
Endrin sldshyde
He pt senior
Heptechlor epoxide
PCS - 1016
PCS - 1221
PCB - 1232
PC8 - 1242
PCB - 1248
PCB - 1254
PCB - 1260
Toxsptwne
Endrin Katone
Hethoiychior
FSY 01
66^9

<0.008
<0.008
<0.008
<0.008
<0.008
<0.08

-------
                               RESULTS OF SOIL ANALYSIS FOR PRIORITY POLLUTANT
                                           BASE/NEUTRAL COMPOUNDS
                                     (•11 results in ug/kg •• received)
                                                                                              U-2J88
pp #
(18)
(58)
(88)
(96)
(128)
(188)
(208)
(258)
(26B)
(278)
(286)
(356)
(368)
(378)
(398)
(408)
(418)
(428)
(436)
(528)
(536)
(548)
(558)
(568)
(628)
(638)
(668)
(678)
(688)
(696)
(706)
(718)
(728)
(738)
(748)
(758)
(768)
(778)
(788)
(798)
(808)
(818)
(928)
(838)
(848)
CAS 1
83-32-9
92-87-5
120-82-1
118-74-1
67-72-1
1 1 1-44-4
91-58-7
95-50-1
541-73-1
106-46-7
91-94-1
121-14-2
606-20-2
122-66-7
206-44-0
7005-72-3
101-55-3
39638-32-9
111-91-1
87-68-3
77-47-4
78-59-1
91 -20-1
98-95-3
86-30-4
621-64-7
117-81-0
85-68-7
84-74-2
117-84-0
84-66-2
131-11-3
56-55-3
50-32-8
205-99-2
207-08-9
218-01-9
208-9*-«
120-12-7
191-24-2
86-7V7
85-01-8
53-70-3
193-39-5
129-00-0
Compound
•cenepnthene
benridine
1 , 2 , 4-tr ichlorobenrene
hex«chloroten?ene
hexachlor oe thane
bie(2-cnloroetny l)ether
2-chloronepnth«lene
1 ,2-dichlorotoenrene
1 , J-dichlorobenrene
1 ,4-dichloroben/eoe
3,3l-dichlorobenridlne
2,4-dinitrotoluene
2,6-dlnltrotoluene
1,2-diphenylhydr«7ine
fluorenthene
4-cftloropftenyl phenyl ether
4-6ro«ophenyl phcnyl ether
bi«(2-chlorai«oprapyl)etner
bl«( 2-chloroetoxy )«thenc
hexecMoroCut«diene
hexeehloracycloDentodien*
isopnorone
nephthelene
nitroben/ene
N-nitroeodipnenylaein*
N-nitroBOdiprapylMine
bii(2-ethylhexyl) phthelete
benzyl butyl phttwlet*
di-n-butyl phtheUte
di-n-octyl pnthel«te
diethyl phthelate
dl«ethyl phthelete
benro( •) enthr ecene
b«nro(«)pyrem
benro ( b ) f luorenthene
boflro(k) fluorwithen*
cfvywns
ecenapnthylene
enchf ejcefflV:
b*nra(ghi )p»ryl»m
riuanra
ph»n«nthren«
dlb*nra(i,n)«nthrae«n*
IndBood ,2,3-cd)pyrene
pyr«n«
E & E Lab No. 86- 6639
Se»ple Identity FSY
01
<500
<2500
<500
<500
<500
<500
<500
<50Q
<50D
<500
<500
««egt mill rmiruiifiH ni

-------
                                                                                          U-2388
                    QUALITY CONTROL FOR ACCURACY:  PERCENT RECOVERY
                                    FOR SPIKED SOIL SAMPLES
Element
Beryllium
Chroniin
Copper
Mercury
Nickel
Zinc
£ 4 E
Lsborstory
No. 85-
6639
6639
6639
6639
6639
6639
Original
Vslue

<15
52
<25
<0.2
27
73
Awount
Added
(PP*>)
50
200
250
1
500
500
Amount
Determined

27
230
179
1.06
462
462
Percent
Recovery
54
89
72
100
87
78
•Spike performed on aqueous digest of soil sample.  Results reported in ppb.
                                           B-32

-------
                                                 U-2388
  QUALITY CONTROL FO* PRECISION
RESULTS OF ANALYSIS OF REPLICATE
    ANALYSES Of SOIL SAMPLES
ElMwnt
ChrtMiui
terylliui
Copptr
Nlcktl
Zinc
Silvw
ArMnie
Antiaony
Seleniui
ThalUui
CadMiui
L««j
Cy«nld«
fefcury
E A E
L*or«tory
Ma. 85-
6639
6639
6639
6639
6639
6639
6639
6639
6639
6639
6639
6639
66*2
66*3
Original
Analysis
4.9
0.5
<2.5
2.5
6.9
<0.50
0.71
<6.0
<0.50
<0.50
<0.10
8.87
<1
<0.01
Repllc«t»
An«Iy«i«
6.3
<1.5
3.0
5.1
7.8

-------
                                                                     U-2388
QUALITY CONTROL  TOR ACCURACYi  PERCENT RECOVERY
                FOR SPIKED SOIL SAMPLES
Co* pound
Triehloroethene
Chlorobenzene
Toluene
Benzene
1,2, 4-T r Ichl orobenzene
Acenaphthene
2,4-dinitrotoluene
pytene
n-nltroao-di-n-propyla»ine
1 ,4-dichlorobenzene
pentachlorophenol
phenol
2-chloro phenol
*-chloro phenol
4-nltrophenol
E A E
Laboratory
*>. 85-
6639
6639
6639
6639
6639
6639
6639
6639
6639
6639
6639
6639
6639
6639
6639
Original
Value

00
<50
<50
<50
<500
<500
<500
<500
<500
<500
<1500

-------
                                                                   U-2388
                     QUALITY CONTROL FOR ACCURACY;
          PERCENT DIFFERENCE—EPA  QUALITY ASSURANCE WTERIALS
ElaMnt
Areenic
Antiaony
Beryllium
Cadiiui
Cnroaiij*
Copper
leed
Hsrcury
Nickel
Selenim
Silver
Thelli«i
Zinc
Concentrations
Know
26.7
101.5
235
J.J
261
JJ9
42.7
8.7
207
50.2
600
25.0
418
in jjq/L
Determined
26.0
100.)
21J
3.2
266
337
41.7
9.0
202
43.6
608
25.6
423
Percent
Difference
2.6
1.4
9.4
3.0
1.9
0.6
2.3
3.4
2.4
13.1
1.3
2.4
1.2
Nat*i  Thee»  rwults
       p«r Meter*.
•ithin the  95X confidence intervel  for theee
                                     B-33
                                                                 r«'i«ltt||« mill ••fl«irt»ltfllriil

-------
                                                                    U-2388
QUALITY CONTROL FOR ACCURACY:  PERCENF RECOVERY
            .  FOR SPIKED SOIL SAMPLES


Con pound

Lindane
Heptachlor
Aldrin
Oieldrin
Endrin
4, 4 '-DOT
£ 4 E
Laboratory
Ho. 85-
Matrix Spike
66)9
6639
6679
6639
6639
6639
Original
Value




-------
                                                                                    U-2388
              QUALITY CONTROL FOR ACCURACY:   PERCENT RECOVERY
                              FOR SPIKED SOIL SAMPLES
Compound
E & E
Laboratory
^Q • 85*
Original
Value

Amount
Added
(*vm>
Amount
Determined

Percent
Recovery
Lindane
Heptachlor
AJdrin
Oieldrin
Endrin
4,4'-DOT
Matrix Spike
  Duplicate
   6639
   6639
   6639
   6639
   6639
   6639
<0.008

-------
              Table C-1



SOIL SAMPLE DATA - OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 1985
Location
FSA
DSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
OSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
DSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
DSA
FSA
FSA
Number
01
01
01
01
01
01
02
02
02
02
02
03
03
03
03
03
04
04
04
04
04
05
05
05
05
05
05
06
06
06
06
06
07
07
07
07
07
08
06
08
08
08
08
09
09
09
09
Depth
A
A
B
C
D
E
A
B
C
D
E
A
B
C
0
E
A
B
C
D
E
A
8
B
C
D
E
A
B
C
D
E
A
B
C
0
E
A
B
C
C
D
E
A
A
B
C
Lead Cadmium
(mg/kg) (
-------
                                  APPENDIX C

                              SOIL AND  SEDIMENT
                               ANALYTICAL DATA
                                      C-l
•?<-.c'ecl oapef                                                     	ill|f\

-------
Table C-1 !Cont.)
Location
FSB
FSC
FSC
OSC
FSC
FSC
FSC
FSC
FSE
DSE
FSE
FSE
FSE
FSE
FSE
FSE
FSE
FSE
FSE
FSE
FSE
FSE
DSE
FSE
FSE
FSE
FSE
FSE
FSE
FSE
FSE
DSE
FSE
FSE
FSE
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
OSG
FSG
FSG
Number
06
01
01
01
01
02
02
02
01
01
01
01
02
02
02
03
03
03
04
04
04
05
05
05
05
06
06
06
07
07
07
07
08
08
08
14
14
14
15
15
15
15
15
23
23
23
23
23
23
Depth
C
A
B
8
C
A
B
C
A
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
8
C
A
B
B
C
A
8
C
A
B
C
C
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
C
D
E
A
B
• c
C
0
E
Lead Cadmium
(«g/kg) (ing/kg)
42.00
257.00 <1
20.60 <1
16.60 <1
6.54 <1
8810.00 3.16
62.50 1.62
24.00 1.10
394.00
332.00
3.45
2.00
13.20
1.89
95.90
174.00
6.39
<5
62.90 <1
7.13 <1
6.86 <1
300.00 <1
19.80 <1
23.30 <1
61.70 <1
283.00 <1
9.80 <1
6.25 <1
1110.00
46.10
4.81
3.89
216.00
170.00
26.30
15.50 <1
4.54 <1
7.00 <1
11.90
4.63
3.75
7.29
7.33
3060.00 <1
4790.00 <1
5710.00 <1
4710.00 <1
1400.00
622.00
Ant imony
(mg/kg)
„
<12
<12
<12
<12
169.00
<12
<12
—
—
—
—
__
—
—
—
—
—
<12
<12
<12
18.60
12
<12
02
<12
<12
<12
..
—
__
„
—
„
..
<12
<12
<12
__
__
._
__
__
<12
17.30
<12
<12
__
__
pH
Units
3.90
8.54
7.26
7.61
6.10
5.61
4.20
4.25
4.66
4.89
4.66
4.27
4.55
4.47
4.37
6.61
6.79
6.73
5.67
5.58
6.25
5.95
6.22
6.19
6.44
5.68
6.67
6.55
5.68
5.96
6.35
6.34
2.66
3.15
2.98
5.25
5.52
5.32
5.41
5.39
5.11
4.70
4.69
5.75
5.84
4.53
4.49
5.40
5.51
•i Water
14.00
11.00
12.00
13.00
18.00
8.00
11.00
10.00
27.00
27.00
14.00
8.00
17.00
14.00
11.00
24.00
19.00
20.00
14.00
23.00
24.00
24.00
18.00
16.00
16.00
24.00
17.00
18.00
11.00
13.00
14.00
14.00
15.00
23.00
21.00
15.00
16.00
15.00
10.00
12.00
26.00
22.00
24.00
11.00
12.00
26.00
20.00
31.00
32.00
                                        C-4

-------
Table C-1  (Cont.)
Location
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
DSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
DSA
FSA
FSA
DSA
FSA
FSB
FSB
FSB
FSB
FSB
DSB
FSB
FSB
FS8
FSB
FSB
FSB
FSB
FSB
FSB
FSB
FSB
FSB
FSB
FSB
OSB
FSB
FSB
FSB
FSB
Number
09
09
10
10
10
10
10
11
11
11
11
11
12
12
12
12
12
12
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
01
01
01
02
02
02
02
02
02
03
03
03
03
03
04
04
04
04
04
05
05
05
05
06
06
Depth
D
£
A
B
C
D
E
A
B
C
D
E
A
B
C
0
D
E
A
B
8
C
0
E
E
A
a
C
A
B
B
C
0
E
A
8
C
0
E
A
B
C
0
E
A
A
a
c
A
a
Lead
(ing/ kg)
9.33
10.60
10800.00
86.40
54.00
54.90
48.20
7710.00
4750.00
8140.00
547.00
190.00
2716.00
402.00
661.00
64.20
68.40
60.30
98.60
4735.00
8842.00
6317.00
217.00
151.00
254.00
43.20
11.50
2.57
8330.00
325.00
746.00
460.00
157.00
100.00
66100.00
650.00
400.00
168.00
57.00
3780.00
219.00
128.00
278.00
34.90
543.00
654.00
9.43
13.80
5300.00
3260.00
Cadmium
C mg/kg }
<,
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<.6Q
<.65
<.87
<.57
<.50
<.58
<.56
0.67
0.78
<.50
4.82
0.92
1.27
—
—
—
—
— .
__
—
__
._
.-
-.
__
—
_.
—
—
_.
—
..
—
--
..
..
—
._
Antimony
<12
<12
27.60
16.80
<12
<12
<12
24.20
13.50
45.50
<12
<12
3.60
0.52
15.40
0.23
<.20
<.23
0.22
13.90
13.60
11.80
0.56
0.46
0.64
—
—
—
..
—
._
—
._
_.
--
—
..
—
-_
._
—
-_
—
—
--
—
—
..
—
._
pH
Units
5.27
5.33
7.96
7.46
6.64
6.37
6.03
7.89
4.84
4.75
5.07
5.11
7.28
6.04
3.46
3.43
3.45
3.44
3.86
3.30
3.23
3.10
3.12
3.33
3.29
5.36
5.07
5.17
6.86
5.74
5.64
5.02
4.76
4.48
6.02
5.00
4.97
4.58
4.80
5.70
4.75
4.52
4.93
4.22
5.17
5.05
4.28
4.28
6.73
3.77
S Water
33.00
34.00
17.00
24.00
14.00
16.00
17.00
19.00
18.00
30.00
15.00
13.00
18.00
14.80
32.60
28.20
21.80
15.90
9.10
16.90
15.20
21.00
37.70
22.10
19.50
14.00
15.00
16.00
8.00
13.00
13.00
23.00
18.00
19.00
12.00
9.00
14.00
13.00
10.00
10.00
12.00
15.00
11.00
10.00
10.00
9.00
12.00
14.00
13.00
14.00
                                        C-3

-------
Table C-1 CCont.)
Location
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
OSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
OSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
DSC
FSG
FSG
OSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
Number
56
56
62
62
62
64
64
64
64
64
64
65
65
65
65
65
66
66
66
66
66
67
67
67
67
67
67
68
68
68
69
69
69
71
71
71
71
71
73
73
73
73
75
75
75
75
75
75
Depth
D
E
A
B
C
A
B
C
D
E
C
A
B
C
0
E
A
B
C
0
E
A
B
B
C
D
E
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
8
C
D
£
A
B
B
C
A
A
B
C
D
E
Lead
(ing/kg)
4.42
4.78
102.00
22.70
6.34
16500.00
818.00
187.00
1110.00
33.10
230.00
201.00
220.00
564.00
12.30
10.40
14.10
17.20
6560.00
728.00
673.00
19.00
27.60
20.70
25.10
7.00
10.20
439.00
7.11
10.60
<5
11.00
7.66
1680.00
212.00
601.00
148.00
16.30
37.20
63.30
27.80
20.40
591.00
511.00
50.60
95.30
125.00
16.60
Cadauun Antimony pH
(mg/kg) ( mg/kg} Units
5.49
5.88
4.42
5.20
5.25
5.73
4.69
4.91
4.85
4.95
4.82
5.34
4.98
4.89
4.97
4.94
5.74
5.84
5.47
— 5.55
5.14
5.42
5.50
5.73
5.64
5.70
5.44
4.95
5.02
— 5.01
5.02
5.35
5.88
4.54
4.41
4.56
4.93
4.70
4.52
4.46
4.95
4.98
5.73
6.02
6.00
5.18
5.66
5.70
\ Water
9.00
8.00
9.00
12.00
9.00
8.00
93.00
7.00
10.00
22.00
7.00
12.00
10.00
9.00
9.00
9.00
9.00
9.00
11.00
14.00
15.00
11.00
13.00
12.00
15.00
14.00
18.00
12.00
20.00
24.00
12.00
13.00
15.00
16.00
10.00
13.00
5.00
3.00
7.00
8.00
7.00
9.00
11.00
11.00
18.00
23.00
17.00
17.00
                                        C-6

-------
Table C-1  (Cont.)
Location
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
DSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
DSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
Number
24
24
24
25
25
25
33
33
33
33
34
34
34
34
34
35
35
35
43
43
43
44
44
44
45
45
45
51
51
51
51
51
51
53
53
53
53
53
54
54
54
54
54
55
55
55
56
56
56
Depth
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
B
C
A
8
C
0
E
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
A
B
C
D
E
A
B
C
D
E
A
B
C
D
E
A
B
C
A
B
C
Lead Cadmium
(rag/kg) (mg/kg)
26.10
8.73
10.10 ~
22.00
5.87
5.63
81.40 1.56
3.98 <1
5.50 <1
4.81 <1
246.00 <1
53.40 <1
3.08 <1
2.62 <1
8.84 <1
41.70
<5
3.68
1740.00 <1
690.00 <1
690.00 <1
17.40
3.66
4.12
68.20
8.55
3.99
19200.00 <1
22700.00 <1
84200.00 2.20
15300.00 <1
2100.00
518.00
2264.00 <1
16700.00 <1
5310.00 <1
695.00 <1
509.00 <1
177.00 <1
17.60 <1
53.90 <1
214.00
19.50
1870.00
107.00
59.00
479.00
20.20
22.90
Antimony pH
(mg/kg) Units
4.67
5.21
5.23
5.13
5.11
5.04
<12 5.71
<12 5.44
<12 5.19
<12 4.97
<12 5.90
<12 5.10
<12 5.00
<12 5.55
<12 5.18
5.90
5.22
5.32
<12 5.66
<12 4.87
<12 4.75
— 4.82
4.83
4.94
5.48
5.20
5.02
55.90 5.65
42.20 6.18
110.00 5.67
16.70 5.15
5.42
6.21
<12 5.25
31.50 6.17
18.70 5.10
<12 5.40
<12 5.76
<12 4.75
<12 4.92
<12 4.65
5.48
5.29
5.57
4.55
5.22
5.61
5.15
4.96
% Water
15.00
16.00
13.00
14.00
12.00
12.00
11.00
12.00
11.00
14.00
9.00
17.00
18.00
7.00
7.00
12.00
13.00
14.00
11.00
9.00
13.00
7.00
9.00
12.00
11.00
16.00
16.00
12.00
14.00
14.00
17.00
12.00
9.00
10.00
15.00
21.00
13.00
15.00
20.00
16.00
16.00
23.00
20.00
20.00
18.00
16.00
14.00
22.00
23.00
                                       C-5
   aaoer

-------
Table C-1  (Cont.)
Location
FSG
FSG
FSC
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
DSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSL
DSL
FSL
FSS
FSS
FSS
FSS
FSS
FSS
FSS
FSS
FSS
FSS
FSS
FSS
FSS
FSS
FSS
OSS
FSS
FSS
FSS
DSS
Number
91
91
95
95
95
95
95
96
96
96
96
96
96
97
97
97
97
97
01
01
02
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
15
16
17
18
18
Depth
D
E
A
8
C
D
E
A
A
B
C
D
E
A
B
C
0
E























Lead Cadiiu*
(i»g/kg) (mg/kg)
20.20
18.00
322.00
91 .60
115.00
145.00
31.30
16100.00
169000.00
96600.00
872.00
543.00
234.00
3640.00
29600.00
5010.00
462.00
571.00
3020.00 <1
9670.00 <1
27500.00 <1
218.00
3.59
10.40
95.50
271.00
3.04
7.30
13.50
10.00
2.15
242.00
56.10
20.90
8.62
1670.00
1760.00
76.40 <1
56.70 <1
179.00 <1
169.00 <1
Ant imony pH
(rag/kg) Units
4.85
— 4.99
5.27
5.35
5.37
5.81
5.49
6.61
6.72
— 6.80
5.77
6.19
6.32
7.03
5.78
5.50
5.04
5.21
14.40 6.89
21.90 6.88
51.00 6.88
7.29
4.91
5.50
6.21
6.00
4.17
4.29
4.31
4.56
4.38
4.21
4.04
3.99
5.11
5.94
5.76
<12 4.24
<12 3.96
<12 3.72
<12 3.52
5 Mater
18.00
14.00
8.00
9.00
10.00
9.00
11.00
11.00
9.00
14.00
13.00
9.00
10.00
14.00
18.00
16.00
13.00
12.00
22.00
21.00
18.00
14.00
18.00
6.00
10.00
13.00
8.00
18.00
21.00
19.00
14.00
13.00
34.00
22.00
19.00
19.00
19.00
18.00
21.00
15.00
16.00
                                     C-8

-------
Table C-l  (Cant.)
Location
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
DSC
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
DSG
FSG
FSC
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSC
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
Number
76
76
76
76
76
77
77
77
77
77
78
78
78
78
78
79
79
79
79
32
82
82
84
84
84
85
85
85
85
85
86
86
86
86
86
86
87
87
87
87
87
88
88
88
88
88
91
91
91
Depth
A
B
C
0
E
A
8
C
D
E
A
8
C
D
E
A
B
C
C
A
B
C
A
8
C
A
B
C
0
£
A
A
B
C
0
E
A
B
C
0
E
A
B
C
0
£
A
B
C
Lead Cadmiun
(mg/kg} v'wg/kg)
3770.00
8320.00
25300.00
210.00
200.00
813.00
3940.00
5120.00
574.00
947.00
59.00
75.60
59.20
1 1 .00
16.00
<10
5.83
<5
7.19
8301.00
17.00
17.20
336.00
163.00
141.00
1790.00
267.00
57.50
50.20
94.00
90000.00
22300.00
43800.00
46700.00
16200.00
692.00
1180.00
6090.00
9430.00
703.00
344.00
46.70
45.50
5.35
4.17
5.61
636.00
342.00
258.00
Ant imony pH
(iig/kg) Units
5.66
5.47
5.97
5.15
6.30
5.44
5.39
— 5.61
5.21
5.22
5.92
5.70
5.71
5.35
5.53
5.60
5.55
4.95
5.04
5.18
4.68
4.75
3.95
4.09
4.33
5.35
S.12
5.55
5.15
4.89
6.77
6.80
&.58
6.23
6.18
5.89
7.87
5.39
4.86
— 5.16
5.13
5.00
5.10
— 6.17
5.54
5.16
4.20
4.63
4.59
% Water
15.00
8.00
11.00
12.00
9.00
10.00
10.00
14.00
14.00
18.00
11.00
14.00
13.00
16.00
20.00
16.00
15.00
17.00
20.00
17.00
15.00
14.00
11.00
11.00
13.00
9.00
8.00
11.00
14.00
16.00
10.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
11.00
12.00
8.00
8.00
20.00
16.00
15.00
17.00
10.00
14.00
11.00
14.00
11.00
16.00
16.00
                                        C-7
   eaoer

-------
Table  C-2 (Cont.)
Location
FMK
FMK
FMK
FMK
FMK
FMK
FMK
DMK
FMK
FMK
FMK
FMK
FMK
FMK
FMK
FMK
FMT
FMT
FMT
FMT
FMT
FMT
FMT
FMT
FMT
FMT
FMT
FMT
FMT
DMT
FMT
FMT
FMT
FMT
FMT
FMT
FMT
DMT
FMT
FMT
FMT
FMT
Number
05
05
05
06
06
06
07
07
07
07
08
08
08
09
09
09
01
01
02
02
03
03
04
04
05
05
07
07
08
08
08
09
09
10
10
11
11
11
12
12
13
13
Depth
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
A
B
A
B
A
B
A
B
A
B
A
A
B
A
B
A
B
A
B
B
A
B
A
B
Lead
(mg/kg)
238.00
5.28
3.84
24.20
18.20
2.16
6,660.00
6,410.00
31.40
2.57
34,700.00
953.00
110.00
25.10
<1
6.75
380.00
27.40
111.40
47.20
593.00
57.50
250.00
69.70
520.00
25.20
269.00
<26.10
22.70
34.30
33.20
99.70
62.00
212.00
28.90
34.00
10.70
5.40
10.10
57.00
20.10
26.30
Cadmium
(nig/kg)
0
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
1.33
1.34
<1
<1
1.39
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<.72
<.49
<.27
<.46
0.66
<.61
<.53
<.50
<.55
<.47
<2.72
<2.61
<.49
<.31
<.29
<1.10
<.54
1.21
<.47
<.31
<.40
<.43
<.63
<.66
<.35
<.18
Antimony
(nig/kg)
02
<12
<12
<12
<12
<12
146.00
131.00
<12
<12
216.00
<12
<12
<12
<12
<12
<.29
<.20
<.11
<.18
0.66
<.24
<.21
<.20
0.55
<.19
8.71
1.04
<.20
<.12
<.11
<.44
<.22
0.87
<.19
<.36
0.16
<.17
<.25
<.16
<.14
<.44
PH
Units
4.05
4.05
4.00
5.61
4.78
3.92
5.09
5.33
4.75
5.12
5.27
5.32
5.06
6.37
6.46
5.93
4.33
4.17
5.37
4.19
4.69
3.97
4.21
3.95
4.22
3.85
3.90
3.49
4.04
4.12
4.02
4.38
4.20
4.15
3.54
5.48
4.71
4.78
4.15
3.70
5.58
4.30
% Mater
23.00
17.00
18.00
33.00
29.00
79.00
48.00
47.00
17.00
16.00
45.00
19.00
16.00
21.00
19.00
22.00
52.20
23.80
18.80
28.66
40.70
19.80
39.80
22.10
36.30
21.40
85.70
85.70
39.90
40.00
23.80
76.90
26.40
72.10
28.10
33.20
18.80
18.10
26.60
22.30
35.70
14.10
                                       C-10

-------
                Fable C-2



SEDIMENT SAMPLE DAIA - NOVEMBER/DECEMBER  1985
Location
FMH
FMH
FMH
FMH
FMH
FMH
FMH
FMH
FMH
FMH
FMH
FMH
FMH
FMH
DMH
FMH
FMH
DMH
FMH
FMH
FMH
FMH
FMH
FMH
FMH
FMH
FMH
FMH
FMH
FMH
FMH
FMH
DMH
FMK
FMK
FMK
FMK
FMK
FMK
FMK
FMK
DMK
FMK
FMK
FMK
FMK
DMK
Number
01
01
02
02
03
03
04
04
05
05
06
06
07
07
07
08
08
08
09
09
10
10
11
11
12
12
13
13
14
14
15
15
15
01
01
01
02
02
02
03
03
03
03
04
04
04
04
Depth
A
8
A
a
A
a
A
8
A
8
A
a
A
a
a
A
8
a
A
8
A
a
A
a
A
a
A
8
A
a
A
8
A
A
a
c
A
a
c
A
8
8
C
A
8
C
C
Lead
(mg/kg)
1,860.00
61.80
96.10
51.40
46.70
6.30
16.70
19.70
103.00
19.80
251.00
<20.4
109.00
39.30
31.40
61.00
53.60
32.80
136.00
31.20
31.80
8.90
185.65
19.60
250.00
108.00
510.00
82.40
820.00
72.80
137.60
32.20
183.80
10,900.00
12,500.00
7.80
139.00
1 ,280.00
12.30
115.00
81.60
65.70
60.20
1,270.00
115.00
3.78
2.51
Cadmiun
(mg/kg)
1.78
1.21
2.13
<.53
<.62
<.45
0.49
<.43
<.75
<.55
3.74
2.85
1.35
0.70
0.81
0.70
<.54
<.53
<.54
<.38
<.78
<.39
1.93
<.56
<1.76
<.89
5.07
0.22
<2.74
2.99
<2.04
<2.51
<2.62
1.15
1.51
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
Antimony
(mg/kg)
7.82
1.06
0.71
<0.21
3.00
<.18
<.20
<.17
10.7
0.22
48.10
1.63
5.00
<.22
•C.20
1.29
<.21
<.21
0.76
<.15
2.33
<.16
14.00
<.23
5.98
0.71
16.20
3.86
42.30
2.99
2.04
1.01
4.19
36.20
77.40
<12
<12
27.50
<12
<12
<12
<12
<12
<12
<12
<12
<12
PH
Units
4.79
3.07
3.34
3.45
3.72
3.38
3.44
3.40
3.38
3.44
3.71
2.79
3.49
3.47
3.50
3.48
3.46
3.33
3.44
3.52
3.69
3.60
4.35
3.39
3.60
3.73
3.43
3.18
3.59
3.26
4.20
4.02
4.21
7.05
6.00
4.35
5.10
5.50
4.45
4.30
4.35
4.55
4.30
4.50
4.05
4.30
4.25
S Mater
58.00
53.40
39.30
16.00
35.80
18.40
24.60
20.40
49.60
27.10
85.10
80.90
51.50
33.80
30.20
47.40
29.00
27.50
32.40
17.40
49.20
14.60
53.40
29.70
76.80
62.50
84.40
84.70
86.70
81.60
84.50
83.90
85.80
30.00
32.00
17.00
20.00
33.00
12.00
28.00
24.00
23.00
21.00
36.00
21.00
17.00
16.00
                       C-9

-------
       Tible D-1

WATER LEVEL ELEVATIONS -
SURFICIAL AQUIFER SYSTEM
Mel I No,
HM-03C
HM-06C
MW-09C
MW-10C
MW-UC
MW-12C
MW-13C
MW-14C
MW-16C
MW-17C
MH-18C
MW-19C
MW-20C
MW-21C
MW-22C
MW-23C
(tell Head Elevation
(tat above MSL)
133.16
133.57
143.19
138.80
142.08
137.10
132.90
134.93
134.08
131.83
130.21
131.06
131.11
133.06
136.63
140.39
Water Level
(feet below TOO
3.99
6.94
6.67
9.24
6.67
6.15
4.12
6.24
9.62
4.87
2.36
3.37
2.89
4.57
10.66
3.63
Water Level
tfeet above MSL)
129.17
126.63
136.52
129.56
135.41
130.95
128.78
128.69
124.46
126.98
127.85
127.69
128.22
128.49
125.97
136.76
        D-2

-------
                                APPENDIX 0

                               SROUNDWATER
                          PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL
                             ANALYTICAL DATA
                                    D-l
recvdea caper

-------
                                  Table D-3

                           WATER LEVEL  ELEVATIONS  -
                           FLQRIDAN AQUIFER SYSTEM
Hell No.
MM-01A
MH-03A
HW-04A
MW-05A
MM-06A
MM-09A*
MM-12A*
MW-13A*
MM-14A
MM-21A
MM-22A
DM-01
OW-02
Mail Head Elevation
(feet above HSL)
147.10
132.98
135.10
132.20
133.66
143.75
138.60
133.11
135.21
134.14
137.30
144.36
136.02
Mater Level
(feet below TOO
46.04
32.96
35.62
32.67
33.72
27.50
' 30.43
9.35
35.19
34.91
38.92
44.26
35.68
Mater Level
(feet above MSl)
101.06
100.02
99.48
99.53
99.94
116.25
108.17
123.76
100.02
99.23
98.38
100.10
100.34
•These wells ire considered to be open to the intermediate aquifer systea.
 See Section 3.4.1.
                                      D-4

-------
                                 Table D-2

                         WATER LEVEL ELEVATIONS -
                        INTERMEDIATE AQUIFER SYSTEM
Nell No.
MM-01B
MM-028
MM-03B
MM-03BB
MM-058
MM-Q6B
MM-07B
MM-088
MM-09B
MM- 128
MM- 136
MM- 148
MM- 158
MM-218
MM-228
Mell Head Elevation
(feet above MSL)
147.27
131.93
133.33
133.02
132.21
132.30
136.68
144.71
143.63
138.53
132.93
135.77
131.46
134.32
136.19
Mater Level
(feet below TOO
44.87
7.03
9.62
11.34
7.56
5.87
34.33
22.47
8.00
22.50
11.65
8.80
3.32
8.33
35.27
Mater Level
(feet above MSL)
102.40
124.09
123.71
121.68
124.65
126.43
102.35
122.24
135.63
116.03
121.28
126.97
128.14
125.99
100.92
                                   0-3
caper

-------
                                                                    (able D-5



                                                   SURFICIAL AQUIFER SYSIEM - FIELD PARAMEIERS
O




I 4 E
November - December
Number
NW-OX
HW-06C
HW-09C
HN-10C
HM-11C
MW-12C
MX-13C
MW-14C
HM-16C
HM-17C
NM-18C
HM-19C
HM-20C
MW-21C
MW-22C
MW-23C
Nell
Depth
(feet)
10.0
21.0
10.0
14.0
12.0
15.0
12.0
10.0
10.0
6.5
8.0
8.0
5.5
21.0
26.0
17.0
Casing
Depth
(feet)
5.0
11.0
5.0
9.0
7.0
10.0
7.0
5.0
5.0
1.5
3.0
3.0
0.5
11.0
16.0
7.0
pH
(units)
4.60
8.20
5.20
6.00
6.00
6.00
5.00
6.00
3.50
6.20
5.80
5.00
5.00
4.60
6.00
6.00
Conduc-
tivity
(uMhos)
615.00
5.00
170.00
517.00
370.00
660.00
372.00
822.00
3002.00
45.00
455.00
402.00
140.00
27.00
105.00
10.00

1985
Temper-
ature
CC)
22.16
22.47
25.00
22.40
21.30
22.96
20.12
22.43
24.06
19.90
18.82
19.21
18.52
21.47
24.35
21.02

FDER
August - October
PH
(units)
4.50
—
5.50
6.20
4.80
4.00
3.40
4.20
3.30
5.50
J.OO
3.50
3.20
—
—
—
Conduc-
tivity
(umhos)
485.00
—
280.00
335.00
305.00
750.00
660.00
570.00
7500.00
83.00
471.00
385.00
269.00
—
—
—

1983
Temper-
ature
CC)
22.00
—
25.00
24.00
25.00
22.00
22.00
22.00
22.00
--
—
—
—
—
—
—
                    -- Not taken

-------
                              Table  0-4

                        HYDROLOGIC PARAMETERS
                    SAPP BATTERY  MONITORING WELLS
SLUG TEST DATA



Hell No.
MW-Q6A
MW-06B
MW-06C
MW-12A
MW-12B
MW-12C
MW-22A
MW-22B
MW-22C
SPECIFIC

Tranamisaivity
(T)
(gpd/ft)
9968.57
93.07
127.28
223.03
4.57
147.95
10491.54
44.09
210.95
CAPACITY TEST DATA
Hydraulic
Conductivity
(K)
(cm/sec)
9.56 x ID"4
5.58 x 10"5
1.53 x 10"*
7.64 x 10"5
1.57 x 10"6
2.36 x 10"*
1.01 x 10"'
3.35 x 10'5
1.69 x 10"*

Specific Capacity

Mell No.
MW-02B
MW-06B
MW-14A
HN.14C
(SO
(gp»/ft)
0.620
0.081
1.690
0.068







Seepage
Velocity
(ft/yr)
0.90
2.31
0.99
0.99
2.03 x 10"2
12.23
10.41
1.39
1.09

Mell Yield
(WY)
(gp»)
16.12
2.67
84.50
0.476
                                  D-5

-------
                                                                      (able 0-7



                                                     FL OR I DAN AQUIFER SYSICM - FIELD PARAMETERS
CD




E 4 E
November - December
Number
DM-01
DW-02
HH-01A
HW-0)A
MN-04A
MM-05A
HM-06A
MW-09A*
HH-12A*
MW-13A*
MW-14A
HH-2IA
HM-22A
Mell
Depth
(feet)
188
118
130
190
1)0
110
1)4
127
127
115
BO
1)1
1)4
Caaing
Depth
(feat)
84
106
110
170
110
10)
124
117
117
105
70
121
124
PH
(unite)
6.00
6.00
6.00
6.40
6.00
6.50
6.00
9.00
6.00
6.00
6.00
6.00
6.00
Conduc-
t ivlt y
(umhoa)
202.00
212.00
210.00
440.00
175.00
57.00
92.00
200.00
200.00
1)72.00
J20.00
262.00
375.00

1985
temper-
ature
en
21.91
2). 26
24.9)
22.00
20.48
20.91
22.20
—
22.88
22. )1
20.96
21.75
22.20

EDER
August - October
PH
(unite)
5.8,
7.5
8.00
7.70
8.20
7.60
8.00
--
—
--
4.30
7.00
—
—
Conduc-
tivity
(unhoa)
240.00
170.00
250.00
)70.00
320.00
295.00
--
—
—
1040.00
2 BO. 00
—
—

1983
Temper-
ature
CC)
21.00,
22.00
22.50
21.00
22.00
21.50
21.50
--
—
--
22.00
21.50
—
--
                     These Hells are conaldered to be open to the intermediate aquifer system.  See Section 3.4.1.



                     — Not taken

-------
                                                 Table 0-6



                              INIERHCDIATE  AQUIFER  SYSIEM - FIELD PARAHCIERS
E 4 E
November - December
Nuabar
NM-01B
HM-02B
HM-038
MN-03BB
MH-05B
MM-06B
MM-07B
HW-08B
HM-09B
HH-12B
MX- 156
HN-14B
MN-15B
NH-21B
HH-22B
Mall
Depth
(feat)
53
35
65
too
40
40
54
50
53
60
65
48
30
60
62
Caaing
Depth
(faat)
36
25
55
90
30
30
48
40
43
50
55
38
20
50
52
pH
(unite)
6.00
6.00
6.00
3.00
6.00
9.00
6,30
7.00
6.70
6.00
8.00
6.00
4.50
5.50
6.50
Conduc-
tivity
(uBhos)
340.00
152.00
2275.00
4032.00
110.00
312.00
660.00
670.00
220.00
187.00
1222.00
167.00
467.00
22.00
265.00
1985
leoper-
ature
CO
21.45
21.95
23.45
23.10
21.68
22.15
—
23.07
—
23.07
22.72
22.87
20.65
21.65
22.67
FOER
August - October 1983
PH
(units)
7.90
5.80
3.50
3.50
5.90
6.00
8.00
6.50
—
--
6.10
6.10
4.00
--
—~
Conduc-
tivity
( Mhos)
205.00
40.00
7800.00
10200.00
60.00
53.00
310.00
59.00
—
«
160.00
420.00
680.00
~
~—
leaper-
ature
CO
22.00
21.00
22.00
22.00
22.00
22.00
22.00
22.00
—
--
22.00
22.00
22.00
—
~~
-- Not taken

-------
                                                                        Table D-9

                                              SUREICIAL AQUIFER SYSTEM METALS DATA - NOVEMBER/DECEMBER  1985
                                                                         (I 4 E)
O

H-«
O
Metal Concent rat iona
Nutber
HH-03C
HM-06C
HM-09C
HM-10C
MM- ire*
MW-11C
MW-12C
MM-13C
HM-14C
MH-16C
MH-17C
MM-18C
MW-19C
HH-2QC
MM-21C
MH-22C
MM-23C
MH-23C*
Aluilnui
_
52.600
~
35.100
45.200
5.010
27.600
1.590
3.540
265.000
0.643
73.100
17.300
11.600
56.500
2.460
3.530
7.760
Ant inony
0.118
<0.060
<0.060
<0.060
<0.060
<0.060
<0.600
<0.060
<0.600
<0.060
<0.060
<0.060
<0.060
<0.060
<0.060
<0.600
<0.060
<0.060
Areenic
0.282
<0.005
0.006
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
0.009
<0.005
<0.050
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.050
<0.005
<0.005
CadMiun
0.004
<0.001
<0.001
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
0.014
<0.005
<0.005
0.076
<0.001
0.023
0.002
0.006
0.001
<0.005
0.007
<0.005
(PP-)
Lead
4.960
0.046
6.270
0.257
0.290
0.021
0.413
0.061
3.720
0.286
0.027
0.059
0.013
0.043
0.022
<0.005
0.007
<0.005

Manganeae

<0.015
—
6.960
5.910
2.240
4.920
0.232
28.100
6.940
<0.015
0.722
0.276
0.119
0.028
<0.015
<0.015
0.033

SeleniiM
<0.050
<0.010
<0.005
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.005
<0.005
<0.050
<0.050
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
                         •Duplicate ample

                         -- Not  analyzed

-------
                                                                                   labie D-8


                                                                      HESIOENUAt WEILS - FIEID PARAMEIERS
2
D
             o
              I



Number
GM-OI
CM-02
CM-0)
CM-04
CW-OS
GM-07
GM-08
GH-09
CM- 10
GH-II
CM- 12
GW-15
CM- 14
GW-IS
CM- 17
CM- IB
CM- 19
GH-20
GM-21
GM-22
CM- 26
CM-27
GM-28
CM- 29
CW-W


Hell
Depth
(feet)
ISO
—
2)0
2*0
—
128
172
IS5
..
160
60
--
—
—
--
—
__
126
_-
—
—
--
._
—
—

November

pH
(units)
6.80
7.80
7.70
7. SO
7.60
7.80
7.20
7.40
8.20
8.00
7.60
8.00
8.10
7.70
7.80
7.80
7.50
7.40
7.80
7. SO
7.80
8.00
7.00
7.80
7.60
[ 4 E
- December
Conduc-
tivity
(unhos)
200.00
160.00
180.00
240.00
200.00
180.00
66.00
100.00
IBO.OO
160.00
J90.00
160.00
140.00
180.00
160.00
140.00
22S.OO
220.00
160.00
220.00
180.00
120.00
160.00
160. Od
220.00

I98S
temper-
ature
Cc)
20.00
21.00
19.00
19. SO
20.00
21.00
21.00
18. SO
20.00
17.00
18.00
19. SO
19.00
19. SO
19.00
19.00
20.00
17.00
20. SO
18.00
19. SO
19. SO
20. SO
19.00
19.00

August

pH
(units)
7.10
7.20
7.50
7.10
--
7.)0
6.00
7.40
7.70
7.20
7. 10
--
—
—
—
—
—
7.10
~
—
—
—
--
—
~~
FOER
- October
Conduc-
tivity
(uahos)
22S.OO
220.00
22S.OO
260.00
--
240.00
19.00
22.00
2SO.OO
280.00
40S.OO
—
--
—
—
—
—
270.00
—
—
--
—
--
—
"

I9B)
Temper-
ature
CC)
22.00
21. SO
21.00
21. SO
--
22.00
25.00
22.00
21.00
22.00
20.00
—
—
--
—
—
—
25.00
--
—
—
—
--
--


-------
                                                                   Fable D-11



                                          FLORIDAN AQUIFER SYSTEM MUMS DAI A  - NOVEHBER/DECEHBER 1985

                                                                    (E & t)
a
i
Metal Concentrations
Number
OW-01
OH-02
HN-01A
HH-03A
MM-04A
MW-05A
HW-06A
MW-09A*
HW-12A"
MW-13A'
MW-14A
HH-21A
MW-22A"
MM-22A
Aluminua
0.809
1.120
1.730
—
0.559
J.550
1.040
16.600
115.000
2.5BO
5.260
7.720
1.0)0
1.490
Antimony
<0.060
<0.060
<0.600
<0.060
<0.600
<0.600
<0.060
<0.060
<0.060
<0.060
<0.600
<0.060
<0.060
<0.060
Araenic
0.018
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
0.014
0.092
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
Cadmiu*
<0.005
0.026
<0.005
0.003
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
0.004
0.011
<0.005
0.002
<0.001
0.001
(PP")
Lead
1.830
1.500
3.680
0.609
0.045
0.080
0.051
0.463
0.065
0.168
0.389
0.029
0.012
0.027

Manganese
2.460
0.173
0.030
—
0.246
0.030
0.113
0.687
0.849
0.876
0.557
0.169
0.047
0.055

Selenium
0.008
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.050
—
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
                      •Ihese wells are considered to be open to the intermediate aquifer system.

                     ••Duplicate sample


                     — Not analyzed
                                                                                                  See Section 3.4.1.

-------
                                                                    fable D-10



                                         INfERHEDIAfE AQUIFER SYSttM MtlALS DATA - NOVEMBER/DECEMBER 1985

                                                                      (t A E)
o
 i
Metal Concent rat ions
Nuaber
HH-01B
MM-02B
MN-02B*
MW-03B
HH-036B
MW-05B
MX- 068
HH-07B
HW-OBB
MM-09B
HN-12B
MW-13B
HM-14B
MW-15B
MW-21B
HN-22B
Alimnua
8.940
1.000
0.986
58.400
—
<0.200
2.210
280.000
10.400
870.000
987.000
1.J80
5.410
18.900
14.200
4.600
Ant mony
<0.600
<0.060
<0.060
<0.060
<0.060
<0.060
<0.060
<0.060
<0.060
<0.600
<0.600
<0.060
<0.600
<0.060
<0.060
<0.600
Arsenic
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
0.021
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.050
<0.050
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.050
Cadmiim
<0.005
<0.001
<0.001
0.021
0.246
<0.005
<0.005
0.032
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
0.007
0.002
<0.005
(PP-)
Lead
0.650
0.011
0.010
4.280
1.280
0.010
0.015
0.509
0.761
0.546
0.501
0.149
0.242
0.021
0.020
0.006

Manganese
0.161
<0.015
<0.015
0.493
—
<0.015
0.025
17.400
0.060
0.459
0.502
0.184
0.184
0.415
0.037
0.110

Selenium
<0.005
<0.010
<0.010
<0.500
<0.050
<0.010
<0.050
<0.050
<0.005
<0.050
<0.005
<0.050
<0.005
<0.010
<0.005
<0.005
                      •Duplicate  aaapla



                      —  Not  analyzed

-------
Fable 0-1Z (Cant.)
Metal Concentrations (ppn)
Nuaber
GH-Z1
CM- 22
GW-26
GH-27
GH-28
CM- 28*
CM- 29
CM- 30
Aluainui
<0.200
<0.200
<0.200
<0.200
<0.200
<0.200
<0.200
<0.200
Antinony
<0.060
<0.060
<0.060
<0.060
<0.060
<0.060
<0.060
<0.060
Arsenic
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.00»
<0.005
<0.00»
CadMluM
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
Lead
0.010
<0.005

-------
                                                                    fable D-12


                                               RESIDENTIAL WELL METALS DAIA - NOVEMBER/DECEMBER  1985

                                                                      (t A E)
o
 i
t—•
OJ
Metal Concentrations (pp>)
Number
GH-Ot
GW-02
GW-03
GH-04
CW-05
GH-07
GW-08
CM-09
CW-09*
GM-10
CM- 11
GW-12
GW-12*
GW-1)
CM- 14
CW-1S
CM- 17
GM-18
CM* 19
GM-20
AluMinui
<0.200
<0.200
C0.200
<0.200
<0.200
<0.200
<0.200
<0.200
<0.200
<0.200
<0.200
<0.200
<0.200
<0.200
<0.200
<0.200
<0.200
<0.200
<0.200
<0.200
Antiaony
<0.060
<0.060
<0.060
<0.060
<0.060
<0.060
<0.060
<0.060
<0.060
<0.060
<0.060
<0.060
<0.060
<0.060
<0.060
<0.060
<0.060
<0.060
<0.060
<0.060
Araenic
<0.005
<0.005

-------
                                                                   table D-14



                                          INTERMEDIATE AQUIFER SYSTEM METALS DAIA - AUCUS[/OCTOBER 1983

                                                                     (fOER)
o
I
Metal Concentrations (pom)
Nunber
HH-01B
HH-02B
MU-03B
MH-03BB
HH-05B
MM-06B
MW-07B*

HH-OBB
HH-13B
MM-14B
MW-15B
Aluitnui
2.000
0.970
880.000
100.000
4.000
3.500
1.300
<0.700
0.800
0.400
O.BBO
14.000
Antiwmy
0.002
<0.001
NA
NA
<0.001
<0.001

-------
                                                                      Table 0-1)

                                              SUHf ICIAL AQUIFER 5YSIIM HCIALS  DAIA  - AUCUSt/OCIOBER  1983
                                                                        (FDER)
I
en
Metal Concentrations (poa)
Number
HH-03C
MM-09C
HN-10C
HM-1IC
HH-12C
MM- DC
MM-14C
MH-16C
MW-17C
NM-16C
HH-19C
HM-20C
Aluaunua
2.600
0.600
4.000
1.900
400.000
8.700
4.100
860.000
1.000
73.200
20.200
14.900
Ant lawny
0.008
0.003
0.004
<0.001
<0.001
0.004
0.003
0.002
<0.200
<0.200
<0.200
<0.200
Arsenic
0.092
0.003
0.002
0.002
0.001
0.008
0.001
0.001
<0.010
<0.010

-------
CD
                                                                     (able D-16



                                                RESIDtNHAL MCLl METALS  DATA - AUGUSf/SCPrCHBCR 1983
Metal Concentrations (pom)
Nunber
CM-01
01-02
GW-OJ
GM-04
GW-07
GW-08
GM-09
CM- 10
CW-11
CW-12
CM- 20
AluMinui
y.6oo
0.050
0.040
0.070
0.920
1.300
0.180
0.060
0.130
7.100
0.040
Antinony
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
Arsenic
0.005
0.007
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.003
0.002
0.001
0.002
CadniuH
0.004
<0.001

-------
                                                lable 0-15

                         FlOR IDAN AQUIFER SYSTEM MEFALS DATA - AUGUST/OCTOBER 1983
                                                  (FDER)
Metal Concentrations (pp»)
Number
MH-OIA
MW-03A
MH-04A
MW-05A
MW-1JA*
MH-14A
OH-01
DW-02"

Aluainu*
0.080
0.880
0.210
44.000
210.000
2.400
3.000
0.600
<0.700
Antimony
<0.001
0.002
<0.001
0.002
<0.001
0.001
<0.001
0.005
<0.200
Arsenic
0.002
0.002
0.001
0.005
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.002
<0.010
CadMiun
<0.00t
<0.001
<0.001
0.034
0.001
0.001
<0.001
0.005
<0.010
Lead
0.005
0.100
0.003
0.100
0.017
0.100
0.014
2.100
0.069
Manganese
0.010
0.060
0.030
0.090
2.900
0.060
0.070
0.160
<0.025
SelemuB
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
* 0.001
0.004
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
NA
Nickel
0.007
0.012
<0.001
0.200
0.033
0.021
0.009
0.042
NA
Copper
0.024
0.031
0.023
0.080
0.072
0.032
0.024
0.130
NA
 •MW-13A la considered to be open to the intermediate aquifer system.   See Section  3.4.1
••First and second lines present  August  and October 1983 data,  respectively.

-------
                                                  •Table D-12B

                                RESIDENTIAL WILL  METALS DATA - JANUARY,  1985 (ESE)
ENVIftOMlENlU  SCIENCE I ENGINEERING

     MOJECC NimiER  t*UII«0
     flflD GROUP: StGUl
                in     suiPiESs ui
01/01/15           SI«IU$:  flNH

                 fROJECI NIK   SIPP IIIIERT
                 PROJECI lUNIttRi
                 HE 10 GROUP LEIOERi D.lKIOR
SIMPLE NUMBERS


PmnEIERS SldKI •
GU-I GM-I
tlltOO UI10I
GM-1 GU-t
t)«OI UltOI
GH-5

GH-)
t)I10>
GH-I
«)110)
GM-1
4TI10I
GU-IO
* 12 101
GU-II
tlltIO
BEIHOD •
DUE
IINE
IIKUINIU,I.(HC/L-
CICOI)
LEIO,IOIIlfUC/Lt

COPPER, iOIUIUC/L>

INUNONt,IOIIKUG/l)

o CIOIUUM»IOIH
i
o NICKEL, I,IUG/LI

IRSENK,IOIIl(UG/ll

1ING*NESE,(UG/U

IIUHINUH,IOIII(UG/II

SELENIUM, lOIUIUG/LI

PH,FIELO(SIO UNIISI

SP.CONO.,F1ELI
IUHMOS/CHI
UIIER IEHP 
-------
                  Table D-12A
RESIDENTIAL WELL  METALS DATA/MARCH  1986 (E & E)
Metal Concent rations
Nunber
GW-01
GW-02
GW-03
GW-04
GW-05
GW-06
GW-07
GW-08
GW-09
GW-1Q
GW-11
GW-12
GW-13
GW-14
GW-15
GW-16
GW-17
GW-18
GW-20
GW-21
GW-22
GW-26
GW-27
GW-28
GW-30
GW-31
Aluminum
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
0.261
<0.2
<0.2
0.302
0.205
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
Ant inony
<0.06
<0.06
<0.06
<0.06
<0.06
<0.06
<0.06
<0.06
<0.06
<0.06
<0.06
<0.06
<0.06
<0.06
<0.06
<0.06
<0.06
<0.06
<0.06
<0.06
<0.06
<0.06
<0.06
<0.06
<0.06
<0.06
Arsenic
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005

-------
      fable D-I2B (Cont.)
                       (NVlROWiEMUL StUNCC t ENdNEEIINC
o
I

INJ
                            PROJECI NunaiR  atut2to
                            MELD tROUP:  SIGUI
                            PlRlltEIERSi Ul     SMPIES: All

CU-22
rmnfCERS SIORCI i Win
(H-21 6U>2)
«)2t2S «?2*2i
CH-21
412121
HilriOD I
U4IE
HUE
UUUN1I1,I.(HC/1-
CUI1I
lE10.IOIU

COPPtMOlUIM/l)

INlIHONTifOfUSI

I/JO/IS 1
II2»
MO 12
0
10)1 O.I
0
I0«2 <5.0
0
lOt) 
-------
                                  IZ-0
                  S   I
                             s   :"  §
r        |°  £  i  5  2  f   =  I  i  I  2sj
                                                             ~
                             o   c»  a  o  o  e   »
                             e   9-  **  «  f  %tt   •»
                                                                        S»   •
                                                                        2   i
                                                          S  -
                                                          S  *!
                             A   A  A   A      A      ^  ^  rv T

                             •   *   •   •    •   •   •  Wl  «*  •• «•
                                    A  A   A
                                                             S^
                                                             •W
                  •   M»   *V
                             A      A  A  W»  ••      •—
                             •-      ^  ••  ^  O      W»
                             •   «••••««»
                                                                 §  ""5
                                                                 3  r~n
                                                                 ••  mm
                                                                 m  w
                                                             S^ 0t    •*
                                                             •*K    O
                                                      «  ^  fSi I    JO

-------
Table D-I2C  (Cont.)
CNVltONKMU  SCIENCE t ENCINEERIN6

     PROJECI NUMBER  8)228200
     FIflO CROUPS StPPM
     PmrE1ERS> HI     SUlPLESs  HI
                                                     05/01/84           SUIUS: FUH

                                                                      PROJCCI NIKE  SIPP BMIERI
                                                                      PROJECf NINJCER* RUSS IOUCN
                                                                      FIELD CROUP LEADERS ion PIRN

                                                                         SMPLC NUMBERS


PlRtNCIERS SIOJC1 •
II
K4110
12
mm
1)
))4112
14
mm
1) 14 1)
J54114 IMll) J541I4
18
J5411)
11
))4116
20
J54111
HCfHM •
otic
HUE
UNUlNllTtl.lHC/l-
CUO)»
SULFIU (Itt/ll
SUIFIOEIPC/L-SI

ictD,ioin
-------
                                                                                              0

64?       »?7       0'6f      49?       76?       44?      »(7       Ot?      %?7       ((7      »6

CO?      f07      %MI      7'07      9*41      »*0?     0*0?      4*0?     0*17      1*17     01          111 Wll HI""
                                                                                              0
On      09*(      04*4      0»*l      Oft      Oft     09*t      Oft      0»*l      04H      00%


OM>      OM>      OM>      OM>      OM>      0*1>     OM>      OM>      OM>      OM>      I%II
                                                                                              0

04>       04>       04>       04>       04>       04>      04>       OS*      04>       Oi»      4011
                                                                                              0

(>        (>        91        t>        00(       (>       (t        t>       t>        (>       «OI
                                                                                              0

t'0>      C0>      (*0>      t*0>      f»       (*0>     (*0>      fO>      (*0>      (*0>      7001
                                                                                              0
0"9>      0*9>      0*9>      0*9>      0*9>      0*9>     0*9>      0*9>      0*9>      0*9>      (901
                                                                                              0
4*0      4*0>      4*0>      4'0>      6*0       4*0>     4*0>      4*0>      4'0>      S'0>      (701   «1/inil»101'uniHO»l


0*I>      0*l>      0*1>      0*l>      0*I>      0*1>     0*I>      0*I>      0*1>      0*l>      (601
                                                                                              0
0*9>      0*9>      0*9>      0*9>      0*9>      0*9>     0*9>      0*9>      0*9>      0"9>      7*01

?-i       5»(       o-o      OM>      f9       o*t>     f%       ft      o-t>      ft      1401      n/9nn»iai«o»ii
                                                                                              0
?0*0>     ?0'0>     50*0      ?0*0>     ?0*0>     70*0>    ?0*0>     70*0>    ?0*0>     ?0'0>    S»(        tS-VIUHOUinS

|>        |>        t>        %         !>!>!>?        7         t        4*6         IV1HI 31Uins
                                                                                              0          1(01*1
471       401       »        171       4%1       »?1      6tl       til      601       (01      0(»    -V»iri«llI«l|l»»Tf


0011      0(01      046       006       0061      04>I     OKI      0091      0041      00»I                           3UH


  %t/9/%    »«/9/»    %t/9/»    %8/9/%    %B/4/%    »V/4/»    %9/4/V    %B/4/%    %l/4/»    »«/4/»                       31*0
                                                                                              • OOM1W
6019S(     90I94(    (0194(    90I9St    401941    »OI94(   tOt9«    701*4t    I0194(    001941    I I3DOIS
    01         6        I         (        9         t        »         I         ?         I
                                                 J1JMIS
                               NH4 HOI  t»30in jnOR9 013IJ                            111  
-------
                        Table D-12D

          COWARISON Of RESIDENTIAL WELL LEAD DATA
                 FOR ALL SAW I INC EPISODES
                           (ppb)
Location
GW-1
CM- 2
GW-3
GW-4
GW-5
GM-6
GW-7
GM-8
GW-9
GM-10
GX-11
GW-12
GW-13
GM-1A
GW-15
GW-16
GW-17
GM-18
GM-19
GM-20
GX-21
GW-22
CM- 26
GM-27
GW-2B
GM-29
GW-30
W-31
FDER
1983
14.0
5.0
4.0
5.0
MS
NS
8.0
7.0
5.0
6.0
5.0
11.0
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
4.0
NS
NS
NS
NS
6.0
NS
NS
NS
ESE
1984
3.9
<3.0
3.9
4.7
<3.0
6.9
<3.0
<3.0
3.5
5.2
<3.0
11.6
7.7
6.4
3.5
3.1
3.1
3.9
3.1
3.5
<3.0
3.9
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
ESE
1/1985
17.0
<3.0
7.5
<3.0
<3.0
NS
6.0
<3.0
6.6
<3.0
<3.0
23.7
0.0
<3.0
<3.0
4.5
10.0
5.6
3.2
<3.0
3.7
<3.0
12.1
3.2
12.1
NS
NS
NS
E 4 E
11/1985
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
10.0
NS
15.0
22.0
12.0
12.0
<5.0
13.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
NS
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
7.0
10.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
23.0
<5.0
NS
E & E
3/1986
21.0
<5.0
16.0
<5.0
<5.0
NS
<5.0
<5.0
12.0
6.0
9.0
24.0
<5.0
<5.0
7.0
NS
5.0
<5.0
<5.0
6.0
5.0
8.0
8.0
7.0
<5.0
NS
<5.0
<5.0
NS = Not
                            D-26

-------
         •s«
         o.a>a>

         S£S  £

         s?IJ  i

         "I  3
      ^  iw UJ O
                         «•»  *  v  e   •   •   •
                         **  •*      •  •«  ^  ••
                         «        e     v  v
                                                          i^   t  -a  •  »
                                     v  v  v  v  w
      H  °
      o  5
         Ij


         5;

                                        -J  1J
                                     -•  ^  S
3
u
                                     0-25

-------
        Larry M.Jacobs  & Associates,  Inc.
             Consulting  Ceotechnical  Engineers*   /
              328 EAST GAOSDEN STREET • PENSACOLA. FLORIDA 32501 • 904/434-0846
                                 FIELD BORING LOG
For:
Name of
                Project N»  • 85-289

                Weather     	

                Page No.    1     «*	L
           MW-9B
Ground Elev.
                        Time 1500 SD
                                                        fir
                                                                      (-U Next Uay
S*B»U
No.


























Staple
Depth— Fwt
From


























To


























Depth Stratum
Fe«t
From

0.0
1.0
10.0
18.0

38.0
43.0


















To

1.0
10.0
18.0

38.0
43.0


55.0
















Vtraal CUMifieatim
MW-9B
Brown silty sond with battery chip fill
Battery chips becoming clayey ot 10.0'
Light or medium grey sandy clay, very wet
Medium grey highly plastic clay-clay
loosened up about 24.0 feet.
Medium grey slightly sandy/gravel clay very
Medium grey coarse sandy clay, wet slurry v«
some milkey white and clear quartz well
rounded pea sized gravel

Comments: HNu = Oppm to 43.0*
HNu = 3 ppm after 43.0'

NOTE: 55.0 feet is bottom of hole because
ria was bendina at 55.0' where sandy water
occurred. Afraid of damaging riq. Also
bentonite oluq used in bottom of hollow ster
to keep sand out of auger.

Construction:
1. 2" PVC Triloc with seal
2. 10.0' 0-01" slotted screen
3. 0' 16/40 sand-53.0' PVC in ground. Hoi.
caved in to 36.0'-37.0'

•Blowt Per «•
lit






wet s
ith









i

2na






irry












1
1




II






9n)


























• ««»•» tl »n« «f IM Ik lummur Inn* u incau t» tnrt i in inu-t

Remarks: Field logs documented by Ecology and Environment
No. Sacks Drilling Mud:.

Type Drill Rig:	
-E-2
                                                           Field Technician

-------
                            APPENDIX E



                          DRILLER'S LOGS
                                E-l
eQ pdper

-------
        Larry M.Jacobs & Associates, Inc.
             Consulting  Ceotechnical  Engineers    /
              328 EAST GAOSOEN STREET • PENSACOO. FLORIDA 32501 • 904/434-0846

                                 FIELD BORING LOG
For:
NfjrtD of Prftjt-f Sapp Bcrterv
Boring NA M w-*< I p Fi^iH Technician -

Pagr Nn
na^ 11 -8-85
rjp ^vf **r E
«f
Time 1030 SO
[/JO I-U
u.
flunpl.
No.


























Sample
Depth— -Feet
from


























T»


























Depth Stratum
FM(
Proa

0.0
2.0
7.0

25.0
42.5

45.0
59.0
41.0















T«

2.0
7.0

25.0
42.5

45.0
59.0
61.0
62.0















Ylraftl CliUtiflcAtioB

MW-21B
Black/brown sandy soil
Tan/orange medium sub-angular sandy clay
Light grey and orange medium sandy clay
with sparse black cinder fragments
Liqht qrey and orange medium sandy clay
Gravel with same qrey white sandy clay
as above. Note: Bit grinding at 42.5'
Light grey medium sandy clay
Milkey white quartz gravel with grey and wh
Light grey medium sandy clay

NOTE: Revert Mix: VariFlo, Soluble Polym
American Colloid Co.
1. Had cave-in as tremmie operations in
progress so sand packed thicker.
2. Also well was plugging between 18.0' an<
20.0' deeo due to large diameter hole to sm<
diameter

Construction:
1. Sand oack and cove in : 23.0'
2. Bentonite pellets 1/4"«2.0'
3. Grout rqix = 34.0'


•Blows Per V
IM









te cl<


eer,




ill








2m









f
















M


























     •( um .t IK m t»mmn
                         Jfl uuhu u «n.« 1 m i»m
Remarks:
                                              m.ur      $ufa: Larry M. Jacobs d Associates, Ir

             logs documented by Ecology and Environment   2r\ller:
               M              (    -  *fl .    _ ... ,    ----- l—l.-^L^^—
                                                                  Modde*
No. Sacks Drilling Mud:.

Type Drill Rig:	
                                            E-4
                                               BY.
                                                       Method: Rotary with revert
                                                            Field Technician

-------
        Larry M. Jacobs & Associates, Inc.
            Consulting  Geotechnicjl  Engineers     /
              328 EAST GAOS06N STREET • PENSACOLA. FLORIDA 32501 * 904/434-0846

                                FIELD BORING LOG
For:
Name of Project!.
Boring v*    MW-9B  FJ..M
Ground Elev         	—
                  Sa   Battcry
                                                     n*ti.
                                                                 Time 1500 SD
                             Datum
            * Water
                                                                  t-U Next uay
StmpU
Ho.


























	 3S
D«pth-
rrem 1


























pi: —
-PMt
T*


























IWU
Worn


























•t
T»


























Vbiut CUadfiemUra

4. 2.0' Bentonitc Pellets (Geo-Pel)
5. 25.0' Grout
6. 13.0' concrete with pad























•B!o«
Ut


























n Per
2no


























8-
Sid


























 _    ,    Field logs documented by Ecology and Environment
 No. Sacks Drilling Mud:.

 Type Drill Rig:	
E-3
   BY.
                                                           Field Technician

-------
        Larry M. Jacobs & Associates, Inc.   /
             Consulting  Ceote c h n i c a 1  Enfineers     /
               328 EAST GAOSOEN STREET • PENSACOLA, FLORIDA 32501 • 904/434-0646
                                  FIELD BORING LOG
                                                                      85-289

Nimfl ff P«J.^. Sopp Battery
MW 1 70 «»• i
Ground EIflv o»tn?ti
Wtither
. , -n. Pagr No

	 Gr. Wftter El

2 „, 2
Time 1010 SD
UOU t-D
a*npi«
Ho.


























	 5=pi; 	
D»ptk— Ft«t
From


























To


























FMt
From


























To


























VUaal CUttUiutiM

MW-1ZB
Comments: Red/brown layers in upper 5'-15
show various tints

Construction:
1. 2" PVC Triloc with seal 63.0'
2. 10.0' 0.01" slotted screen
3. U.O1 16/40 sand. Cove-in at 9.0'-10.0' fi
in after 1 bag of sand
4. Bentonite slurry 2.0' bentonite pellets (G
5. 35.0' grout
6. 2.0' concrete with pad














•Blow* Per «•
lit







lied

*-Pelj
2oa










«



!!










II
1!

II








3id

























     *t kM«( if la Ik taBMr 4rop»M M IMIW> u »r>,, 1 in  •»lll-
Remarks: Field logs documented by Ecology ond
         Sub: Lorry M. Jacobs & Associates, Inc.
         Driller:  Jim Dudley
         Environment
No. Sacks Drilling Mud:_
Type Drill Rig:_	
. E-6
    BY.
          •Itflpers;  R. Mqddox, J. Pounroln
         Method:  Rotary with revert
                                                             Field Technician

-------
        Larry M. Jacobs & Associates, Inc.
             Consulting  GeotechnicaIEngineers
               328 EAST GAOSOEN STREET • PENSACOLA. FLORIDA 32501 • 904/434-0846

                                 FIELD BORING LOG
                                                                        5-289
"».«h-
Nim« of Proj^t- S°PP Battery
Bftrinf N" MW"'2B Fif-MTVrhniri
Ground Eltv. ..... ^
P^gi. Nn 1 nf 2
^ n.t^ Time 1010 SD
1 juu i~Lj
^ftntn CR Water EJ*v.
SMupU
No.
^^••MB^^H
























S*mpl«
Dtptb— F««t
From


























To


























D«pth Stratum
PMt
rram

2.0

5.0



10.0




15.0
20.0
25.0



30.0

35.0


40.0
45.0

To


5.0



10.0

15.0



20.0
25.0



30.0

35.0


40.0
45.0

60.0
VUaal ClftuttleitJon

MW-12B
Light brown/peach clay, very fine sand, som«
chips •
•Blawt Per 6*
1st



Clay, grey and red/brown increasing with depth.
i
get coarses sand and brown, red, and black rounded
gravel pebbles with depth, grey clay and red/
clay layers alternate
Red/brown clay -id medium fine sand slurry
Bottom of bit shows same as 5.0'- 10.0'
Note: Cuttings come up as a slurry of clay
mud, and fine sand. Descriptions based on c
chunks that wrap around and are brought up.
As above
As above, but no pebbles and more gravel
Pink/purple clay, fine sand less than above .
red/brown bands, coarse sand and qravel.
Cuttinas still come uo as slurry. Clav is
plastic and more cohesive
As above, but less sand and gravel, several
larae ( 1/2") rounded quartz pebbles
As above, but darker and qreyish, more fine
sand, less gravel and pebbles. Clay is plastic
but not as tiqht
As above, but no gravel or pebbles
Cuttings-clay and fine sand slurry-Same dark
purple clay
2nd





brownl




ay









1







/


grey













3rd


























• tiumtu •! *>••• M 14* i* MUMf 4rt**M M iMkM (• «m* I in IWH-I*W

Remarkj' ^'c^  '°9S  documented by Ecology and Environment
No. Sack* Drilling Mud:.

Type Drill Rig:	
-E.-5
      BY.
                                                              Field Technician
        rt-oc.ea caper
                                                                       lit rlllirtHIITU III

-------
       Larry M.Jacobs & Associates, Inc.
            Consulting  Geotechnical   Engineers
             328 EAST GADSOEN STREET • PENSACOLA. FLORIDA 32501 • 904/434-0846

                               FIELD BORING LOG
Frtr-


Bonn* N« MW'22B
Ground Elev 	


Sopp Battery

Datum 	
Project No C
. .„._ . Wrathrr
pa£r N« 2
n.t. 11-19-85
Kr W.f, RJ.v
io-^or

«* 3
Time 0830 SO

SaapU
No.


























-' h»PU
Dtp*— r««t
from


























T*


























Depth Stratum
FM(
Prom

0.0
4.0
9.0
14.0
19.0
24.0

29.0

36.0



39.0

42J5
43.0
44.0



49.0

54.0

To

4.0
9.0
14.0
19.0
24.0

29.0

36.0



39.0

42.5
43.0
44.0



49.0

54.0

59.0
VUoal CUi*ifiemtioB
MW-22B Continued
No cuttings
No cuttings
No cuttings
No cuttings
No cuttings
Peach colored sandy clay; sand is fine, some
silt. Very wet at 27.0'-29.0'
Very wet peach colored sandy clay with
some silt; as above
Cream colored wet sandy clay; sand is
coarse-medium, sub-angular. Sand Begins to
increase, may be more properly called a
clayey sand
Peach-cream colored wet sandy clay; clay
coarse-medium and sub-angular
As above, but back to lust cream
Back to oeach
Cream-oeoch clayey sand; sand is coarse to
medium, sub-anaular. Sand becoming finer
(more fine-medium than medium-coarse) wit)1
death
Cream-peach clayey sand/sandy clay.silty
clav with death. No cuttinas.
Went cream-peach silty sand, some clay.
sand very fine to fine
•Blowt P«r 6-
lit






2oa






II


1!
II
|
!l


II
II


II
f


II
II
II








Sri


























   Mr M Mm •( it* w MMin «r*f*M M
                              i* «n»« I in
Remarks:
             logs documented by Ecology ond Environment
No. Saclu Drilling Mud:.

Type Drill Rig:	
                                          E-8
                                                         Field Technician

-------
        Larry M. Jacobs & Associates,  Inc.   /

             Consulting  Ceotechnieal  Engineert/

              328 EAST GADS06N STREET • PENSACOLA. FLORIDA 32501 • 904/O4-0846


                                 FIELD BORING LOG
                                                                      85-289
Name of Project



Ground
                   Saop Banerv
             Weather

                 No.
                                                                           1325 SD
                              Datum
           Rr. Water El«v
w


























Sample
Dtptfc— Ft«t
Tram


























1 To


























Depth Stratum
FM*
Pram

0.0


5.0

10.0
14.0




19.0



24.0
29.0

34.0

39.0




Ta



5.0

10.0
14.0




19.0



It. 0
29.0

34.0

39.0




44.0
Viral ClMdf luttoa

MW-22B
Tan coarse sand and gravel, sand is medium
to coarse, tan to light brown; gravel predom
white rounded quartz
Fine-medium sandy clay; sand is tan to
red/brown, clay = light qrey
As above
Fine-medium sandy clay; some gravel (white,
grey, and red/borwn quartz at top), sand
finer and lower content with depth; clay bee
predominantly pinkish/brown with some light
arey and peach colors
Fine sandv clay; clov color as above-Bottom
of bit-fine sandv clav, clav is marbled combi
of light grev. pinkish/brown, peach and oran^
hrnwn
As above
Light qrey silty clay with some very
fine sand; clay = plastic-Bottom of bit same
Same as above-Few cuttinas clayey "soup" w
some silt and sand- Loss of circulation
No cuttinqs-swallows another tank of revert
Hole caves in bottom 5.0'-7.0'
Jim Dudley notes activity and discoloration
in annulus of MW-22A-8. Levine confirms bi
when another tank of revert is pumped in.
•Blow. Per 6*
Itt


nantl}






omes



2aa













nation!
e/red




ith



>f wot*









sr
ablingjl
ll
Sid


























     •( M**i if IM it utmmtr tnttn M IMOM I* <»»• I in  «»IU-IM«
-------
        Larry M.Jacobs & Associates, Inc.
             Consulting  Ceotechnical   Engineers
              328 EAST GAOSOEN STREET . PENSACOtA. FLORIDA 32501 » 904/434-0646

                                 FIELD BORING LOG
Vnr-

Name of Pro


j«*- s°pp Battefy
Pr«j*r, No °--«
Wrather
Pag* Nn
7

«f
Boring M*    MW-21C FJ..M Technician _

Ground Elev	.	Datar
              »   11-7-85 Time 1155 SD
                               1530 FD
            Gr. Water Elev	
Staple
No.


























StmpU
Depth— Fe«t
From


























To


























Depth Sfrmtum
FMt
Froa

0.0

2.0
6.0
7.5


9.0

















To


2.0
6.0
7.5


9.0

22.0
















Viral ClMittlcatira

MW-21C
Light brown fine medium clayey sand with
rust splotches slightly moist
Light grey fine medium quartz sandy clay
Brown tan fine medium clayey sand; moist
Light arey fine medium quartz sand clay
with very sparse small black cinder fraqment^
moist
Tan fine medium sandy clay with black
orqanic fraqments (coal like); wet

NOTE: Sand comes from Clark Sand Compan
in Pensacola, Florida. Grout consistency is
before (MW-6C)

Construction:
1. 2" PVC Triloc with seal
2. 10.0' 0.01" slot screen
3. 12.0' 14MO sand
4. 2.0' bentonite oellets (Geo-Pel)
5. 5.0' grout
^. 2.0* concrete with oad




•Blow. Per 0-
Ut











f














2aa


























M


























      «r Urn «f It* Ik IU
                          M inckn M tnn I IK
      ,c. ,, ,    ,       XJUP-I      ,^
 Remarks: rield logs documented by ecology ond Environment
               :  Lorry M. Jacobs & Associates, Ir
                    Jim  Buttle
 No. Sacks Drilling Mud:.

 Type Drill Rag:	
E-10 BY.
                            f  "  '"
            Helper:  R. Newby
            Method: 6" Hollow Stem
                                                            Field Technician

-------
        Larry M. Jacobs  & Associates, Inc.
             Consulting  Ceotechnical  Engineer!
               328 EAST GADSOEN STREET • PENSACOLA, FLORIDA 32501 • 904/434-0846
                                  FIELD BORING LOG
                                                                       85-289


_ . v- MW-22B
Bonny No. •««
Ground EI«v_,_

Sopp Battery

Datum
	 Weather

nit* 11-19-85
fip. Watar E1*V

^
Time 0830 SD
1107 FD
StapU
No.


























Staple
Depth— Pert
From


























To


























Depth Sfrmtum
Fe«t
FTOB

59.0
























To


63.0























VboaJ CUuifleaUen

MW-22B Continued
Same as above. Encounter something hard
at 61.0'-62.0'.

Jim Dudley gives me sample from bottom of
hole (he says)-qreyish clay with silt and fine
sand clay is plastic and moist

NOTE: 13:30 Pull augers bottom 20.0'-25.0'
covered with green clay, sometimes fluid,
sometimes more cohesive. Bottom of bit
shows aravel-Samples taken. Gordon
Dean aarees that well should be comoleted
in green elav and gravel because it shoyld
•Blow, Per a*
lit














nrnrliir* wnfr»r.

Construction
53.0'-2" PVC with Triloc seal and 10.0' of
0.0 1" slotted screen. Well comoleted at 62. (
with 3.0' stickup. 13.0' sand. 2.0' Bentoriit?
pHl«»t*- 4-5' grout, 2i5J_CCment. 2-0' be.Qtor


i1

lite
Construct '"" eqmpicted 16:40. Baifily got

5*tS.






2na


























3id


























       »!•«• •( it* ik htmmtt 
-------
        Larry M. Jacobs & Associates, Inc.
             Co n » uIt i n |  Ceoiechnical   Engin e e r s
               328 EAST GADS06N STREET • PENSACOLA, FLORIDA 32501 • 904/43*-0646
                                 FIELD BORING LOG
For:
Name of Project:.
Bering No    MW-"C
Ground Elev	
                   Sopp Battery
Project N

Weather
Page No.
                                                                     85-239
  1
                     «»  2
                         Technician
Dttt.
Time 1405 SD
                              Datum.
 Gr. Water Eev.
                                                                         1505 FU
MA



























Su
Doptfc-
PTOK


























ipio
— F«*t
To


























Ifcpik^
rron

0.0
0.4

5.0

6.5




7.5


9.5

12.0

14.5

19.5
22.0




atfACttB
Mt
To

0.4

5.0

8.5




7.5


9.5

12.0

14.5

19.5
22.0
22.5




Viral CUuUtution

MW-23C
Organic rich, dark brown topsail
Dark grey, moist, silty fine sand w/some cla^
fairly cohesive
As above, but higher water content, still coh
but runnier
Dark grey fine silty sand intermixed with
red/brown clayey sond/sandv clay-not as mue
water as obove-Beain to pick up unusual aron
disinfectant? chlorine? Root seament 1' long
1/2" mqximum diameter
Medium grey, fairly dry silty fine sand with
some clay. Comes up hole as disaggregated
clumps ("popcorn")
— Medium grev/beige fin* siltv sand, moist and
runny, but 5s eoh^siv*. some clav
As 7 1/2-9 1/2, but more sand, fine-medium,
— arey/beige. Larger disaaar«gat«d clumps.
Light grey/beige sandy clay/clayey sand;
fine sand, ,sfj|| jom» 
-------
        Larry M.Jacobs & Associates,  Inc.
             Consulting  Ceotech nic a I   Engineers     /
               328 EAST GAOSOEN STREET • PENSACOLA. FLORIDA 32501 « 904/434-0846

                                 FIELD BORING LOG
For--

Name


, «fp«j.,*. Sopp Battery

-------
        Larry M.Jacobs  & Associates, Inc.
             Consulting  Geotcchnical   Engineers     /
               328 EAST GAOSOEN STREET • PENSACOLA. FLORIDA 32501 • 904/434-0646

                                  FIELD BORING LOG
For:
                                                                  No
Name of Project-—
Boring y»   MW-6C

Groond Elev	
                   Sopp Battery
                                        Page No.
.Field Technician.
 rut*  11-6-85  Time 1400 SD
                    1650 PD
_ Gr. Water Elev,	
tempi*
No.


























Ssapl*
D«ptb— FMt
From


























To


























Dtptb 8&»tnm
iw
rrea

0.0

3.5
6.0

10.0

13.0

















To


3.5
6.0

10.0

13.0


22.0















VtanJ CUMifle*d0n

MW-6C
Brown to block (topsoil) fine-medium quartz
clayey sand, moist, vegetation (0-6")
Grey fine clay guartz sand, very moist
Light grey medium sandy clay, very wet
becoming gravelly at 9.0'
Very light grey to white slightly medium
sandy clay, very wet and sticky
Very light grey medium/coarse sandy cloy-
ciayey sand, less wet than proceeding intervc
Note: hit gravel (or Limestone fragments)^

NOTE: Completed at 1630: Will set final t\
of concrete with security cover in the morni
in order to let grout settle.
Note: PVC is Brainard-Kilman Triloc
Construction:
Note: Sandy clay ran back up in hollow sten
and couldn't get 2" PVC pipe down so pumpe
water down hollow stem to blow out clay.
1. Bottom of PVC at 21.0'
2. 10.0 feet screen
3. 12.0' sand (type 16/40)
4. 2.0' bentonite pellets
5. 5.0' grout
6. 2.0' concrete and pad
•Blow. Per 6*
1st









1,
1?,0

fo fee
ig




d







2na


























3rd


























• Miumr •< M*v> •< 1M l» lumMr «r»»n« U (BUM I* «n»« 1 I* «»l> ijii» u*i»ur
                                                       Sub:  Larry M. Jacobs & Associates, Inc.
Remarks: Field logs documented by Ecology and EnvironmentDriller;  Jim  Dudley	
 No. Sacks Drilling Mud:.

 Type Drill Rjg:	
                                  Helper: R. Newby
                                  Method:  Hollow Stem 6"
                                            •E-14
                             Bv-
                                                              Field Technician

-------
        Larry M, Jacobs & Associates, Inc.  /

             Consulting  Geoteeh n i ea 1   Engineers     /

              328 EAST GAOSOEN STREET • PENSACOUA. FLORIDA 32501 • 904/434-0846



                                 FIELD  BORING LOG
For-

NKOIV of Project '•,.,,
.» MW-23C
TJ *w^ IWA fcJ^*
Ground Elev


Sapp Battery
Field Tcrhnirian --

	 Project N",
V'-nthtr
Pag- No 2

r., w.*« w«
85-ZoT

2
Time 1405 SO
OUO i-u
S^npl*
M«.


























Sample
D«ptb— FMt
From


























1 To


























Dtpth Sfr»tua
FMt
From


























To


























VUml CUMlficadov

MW-23C
Construction:
1. 2" PVC withTriloc seal
2. 10.0' 0-0'" slotted screen
3. 6.0'-7.0' casing
4. WeU=16.0'-17.0' LSD
5. 14.0'- 15.0" sand and cave-in materials
6. 2.0' bentonite pellets
7. 2.0' concrete and pad

















•Blow. Per «•
In


























2aa


























3rd


























          tl It* Ik
                     «»»*•• J* inckM M «tl»« I in  «n»-i»ii»
             logs documented by Ecology
Sub:  Larry M. Jacobs & Associates, Inc.

Driller:  Jim Dudley	
M  c  L ppd,-Environment
No. Sacks Drfilma Mud:	
Type Drill Rjg:.
                                                Bx.
                                           ~E-13
Helpers:  R. Maddox, J. Fountain

Method:  Hollow Stem



           Field Technician
       •ecydec pjper

-------
                                    LAYNE-COfTRAL COjgANY
                                        FORMATION LOG
 CONTRACT,

 CITY	
Sann Battery
                               CONTRACT NO.   1669-170
                                    DATE  1-12-86
Alford
COUNTY
                                     Jackson
           STATE  Florida
 LOG AT 101!
Outside fence by R.R. track - East
 TEST HOLE NO.
          WELL  NO.  21-A
     ELEVATION  N.A.
 DATE BEGAN  11-18-85   DATE  COMPLETED	11-19-85
	SIZE SLUSH PIT   none

 ELECTRIC LOG     none
SAMPLE
NO.

—


i

-












INCHES
MUD



















WT.
MUD



















FORMATION
Sandy red clay
Sand
Sandy clay
Sand and gravel
Pink lime rock




>
«









THICKNESS
EA. STRATA
20
22
21
22
50














TOTAL
DEPTH
• 20
42
63
85
135














Continued -—
                                            E-16
                                                  Drilled by  J.  W.  Johnson
                                                  .Check by    B.  J.  Right

-------
rn
«
f-~*
en
    a  tolll*! FOE* I


    •  Initial FOER M«4ill«*tn« W«ll It ««i..,el


        Mutt** »•« I


        SluUlow *n4 O«P W.II |


^r  (A)  taurtmduu >itd D**p W*tl
        (R«ca*
                                                    RECOMMENDED ADDITIONAL MONITORING WELL LOCATIONS
                                 A-  ofci:P
                                 (',   II Ti' I'l

-------
CONTRACT   Sapp  Battery

CITY
Alford
 LAYNE-CENTRAL COMPANY
     FORMATION LOG

	CONTRACT NO.   1669-170

	COUNTY     Jackson	
               DATE  1-12-86

           STATE   Florida
LOCATION
           Northwest  corner of waste site
TEST HOLE NO.
            WELL NO.   9"A
         ELEVATION   N-A-
DATE BEGAN  11-27-85
             DATE COMPLETED
         12-12-85
	SIZE SLUSH PIT    N°ne

ELECTRIC  LOG     none
SAMPLE
NO.

	

















INCHES
MUD


-
















W.
KCJD



















FORMATION
Fill (W) battery cases •
Muck - swamp wood
Gray clay
Sand
Gray clay
Fine sand
Sand and gravel


t
*









Ccntinutd 	
THICKNESS
EA. STRATA
4
6
3
5
12
30
75

%










TOTAL
DEPTH
4
10
13
18
30
60
135













                                          E-18
                                            Drilled by
                                            Checked bv
                                  J. W. Johnson
                                  B. J. Right

-------
                                     LAYNE-CENTRAL COMPANY

                                         FORMATION LOG
  CONTRACT.


  cm	
              Sapp Battery
              Alford
	CONTRACT N0._


 COUNTY   Jackson
                                                             1669-170
     	DATE 1-12-86


     STATE   Florida
  LOCATION
               Southwest corner of waste site near trailer
 TEST HOLE NO.
                       VELL MO.   12~A
DATE BEGAN
              12-3-85
                               COMPLETED  12-5~85
      ELEVATION    N.A.
SIZE SLUSH PIT
                      ELECTRIC LOG
                                                                               none
SAMPLE
NO.
.
	

















INCHES
MUD


-
















V.T.
MUD














•




FORMATION
Sandy red clay
Gray sand
Gray clay
Sand and clay
Sand and gravel
Fine sand



*
%









THICKNESS
EA. STRATA
4
' 22
11
24
27
47


*










TOTAL
DEPTH
' 4
' 26
37
•• 61
88
135













Continued  ...
                                               E-17
                                                              Drilled  by
                                                              Checked  by
                                                                               J. W. Johnson
                                                                               B. J.
                                              Right
            •ecvciec caper
                                                                       nlitu\ mill i M\in>iiiMi nt

-------
                                   LAJNE-CECTRAL COMPANY
                                       FORMATION LOG
3NTRACT
           Sapp Baccery
       Alford
	CONTRACT N0._

 COUNTY    Jackson
                                                              1669-170
          DATE  1-12-86
                                                                       STATE   Florida
3CATION
         Southeast corner of vaste site
2ST HOLS NO.
                     WELL NO.      6"A    ELEVATIOM   N'A'

    BEQA1I   11-20-85    DATE COMPLETED     11-26-85   	
SIZE SLUSH PIT    none
                                                            ELECTRIC LOG
                                                                              none
SAMPLE
•ro.

—

















INCHES
MUD


-
















V.T.
MUD














-




FORMATION
Sandv red clav
Gray sandy1 clay
Sand (W) clay"
Sand & gravel
Pink lime rock-




•»










THICKNESS
EA. STRATA
A
32
A3
16
40



*











TOTAL
DEPTH
' k
36
79
' 95
135















                                           E-20
            recycled ptpf'
                                                               Drilled  by  J,  w. Johnson
                                                               Checked.bv  B.  J. Right
                                                                rruloCi *nd MvinMimrni   «»*6"«-

-------
                                      LATHE-CENTRAL COMPANY
                                          FORMATION LOG
CONTRACT,

CITY	
                 Sa?P Battery
                 Alford
	CONTRACT N0._

 COUNTY    Jackson
                                                           1669-170
          DAIS  1-12-86

     STATE   Florida
  LOCATION
                 Northwest  corner- of waste site
  TEST HOLE NO.
                       WELL NO.  22A
      ELEVATION  N.A.
SIZE SLUSH PIT    None
  EATS BEGAN   11-12-85    DATE COMPLETED   11-13-83
                                                            ELECTRIC LOG
                                                                              none
SAMPLE
NO.

	










•






INCHES
MUD


-
















WT.
KUD














•




FORMATION
Red sandy clay
Grey sandy clav
Sand
Sand and gravel
Red clay
Pink lime rock



,'



•





THICKNESS
EA. STRATA
6 '
" 32
"l7
t
20
17
43


\










TOTAL
DEPTH
' 6
' 38
' 55
75
92
135













Continued —
                                              E-19
                                                              Drilled by
                                                              Checked by
                                      J.  W. Johnson
                                      B.  J. Right
              recycled paper
                                                                     ri'i»l«»g\ itml rntirttnmrfti

-------
                         SAPP  BATTERY  SITE  FS
                     SAMPLE  IDENTIFICATION  SYSTEMl
I.D. Prefix                          Description

    FSA         10-foot  soil borings, west bank of  west  swamp
    FSB         10-foot  soil borings, along  southern  berm
    FSC         10-foot  soil boring, through  facility foundation
    FSE         5-foot soil borings, east bank of west swamp
    FSG         10-foot  soil boring, grid north of  facility
    FSL         15-foot  soil boring, northwest landfill
    FSS         Surface  soil sample location
    FMH         5-foot sediment boring, swamps
    FMK         10-foot  boring, swamps
    FMT         2.5-foot boring, swamps
    FGW         Residential Well samples, November  1985
    HGW         Residential Well samples, March 1986
    FNW         New Well samples, wells installed by  E i E
    FEW         Existing Well samples, wells  installed previously
    FPW         Facility Wells
    FSF         Fixation Study Samples
    D—         Duplicate samples
    GWR         Field Equipment Rinsate - well sampling
    FSR         Field Equipment Rinsate - soil/sediment  sampling
    SBB         Trip Bottle Blank
^•Excludes priority pollutant sample analyses
 (Summary Report Appendix A)
                                   F-2

-------
                                 APPENDIX F

                     SAPP  BATTERY  SITE SUMMARY  REPORT
                                DATA  CATALOG
                                      F-l
recycled paper                                                     «•«>!<>«» anil rmimnnirni

-------
ecology  and environment, inc.
SUITE 205.2574 SEAGATE DRIVE, TALLAHASSEE FLORIDA 32301 TEL 904877 1978
International Specialists in the Environment
MEMORANDUM
TO:               Brent Hartsfield,  FOER
FROM:             J.  Paul  Oxer.  PE
DATE:             December 16.  1985
SUBJ:             SAPP BATTERY FEASIBILITY  STUDY:   RESIDENTIAL WELL
                  SAMPLING RESULTS
Attached are the results of the analytical  work  for samples taken
Oct( ber 28 for the listed  residential  wells.   Sample identities are
11 -> ed below.
    Station                Location
    FGW-01                 Carl  Dilmore Residence
    FGW-02                 Joseph Duncan Residence
    FGW-03                 James Burdeshaw  Residence
    rGW-04                 Salem Baptist Church
    FGW-05                 Mr.  Jensemus Residence
    FGW-07                 J.  W. Crooms Residence
    FGW-08                 L.  R. Barnes Residence
    FGW-09                 Richard  Bush Residence
    DGW-09                 Richard  Bush Residence  (Duplicate)
    FGW-10           .      Vester Davis Residence
    FGW-11                 Lester Ellerbee  Residence
    FGW-12                 Lester Ellerbee  Tab.  Well
    DGW-12                 Lester Ellerbee  Tab.  Well (Duplicate)
    FGW-13                 Roscoe Kent Residence
    FGW-14                 William  Stoneberger Residence
    FGW-15                 Rufus Mayo  Residence
    FGW-17                 Harold Williams  Residence
    FGW-18                 Carolyn  Skipper  Residence
    FGW-19                 Jackie Farren Residence
                                 F-4
"K cled pii

-------
                               RESIDENTIAL WELL
                             SAMPLE ANALYSES DATA
                                      F-3
recycled paper                                                     rruUtgt and <-min>nmrni

-------
                               MEMORANDUM
TO:                  Rick  Rudy

FRO1'!:                Gary  Hahn

DATE:                December 11,  1985

SUBJECT:             Sapp  Battery  Report;  Job  U-2565

CC:                  Lab File,  QA/QC  File
Attached is the laboratory  report  of  the  analysis conducted on tweni:,'-
nine samples received  at the  Analytical  Services  Center on November '>,
1985.  Analysis was performed  according  to  the procedures set fortf  ir
U.S. EPA Contract Laboratory  Program,  Inorganic Statement of Work,
1984.

All samples, on which  this  report  is  based, will  be retained by E&E
for a period of 30 days from  the date  of  this  report,  unless otherwi ?t-
instructed by the client.   If  additional  storage  of samples is
recjested by the client, a  storage  fee of Sl.OO/sample container pe-
month will be charged  for each sample, with such  charges accruing
until destruction of the samples is authorized by the  client.
GH/cp
enclosure
                                 F-6

-------
  MEMORANDUM
  Brent Hartsfield
  Dorsmber 16.  1985
  Pf.qe Two
       Station
       FGW-20
       FGW-21
       FGW-22
       FGW-26
       FGW-27
       FGW-28
       DGW-28
       FGW-29
       FGW-30
       GWBB-01
Location
Delores Brown Residence
Sandra Rowe Residence
Jill Cosper Residence
James Braxton Residence
Amos Morris Residence
Charles Taylor Residence
Charles Taylor Residence (Duplicate)
Alford Fire Department
Rufus Mayo Residence
Trip Bottle Blank
  JPO/cm
                                   F-5
recycled paper
                                                                und rmintnmrm

-------
             ecology  and environment, inc.
                    p*C«Mt* m lh« Environment
                                   LABORATORY REPORT
                                      FOR
                                    Sapp Battery
                                              RE:  FM-2140
                                              Sampled By:    E & E,  Inc.
                                              Delivered By:  Federal Express
     Job No.:        U-2565
     Sample Date:    11/2,4/85
     Date Received:  11/5/85
     Sample Type:    Water Grab
E & E Lab Number  85-  7763     7764     7765     7766     7767     7768      7'69     Blank
Customer Numb-r       FGW-09   OGW-09   FGW-10   FGW-11   FGW-12   DGW-12   Fa*-13
                                                 results  In mg/L
Al urninum
Antimony
Arsenic
Cadmium
Lead
Manganese
Nickel
Selenium
                      <0.2     <0.2     <0.2     <0.2     <0.2     <0.2      -0.2      <0.2
                      <0.06    <0.06    <0.06    <0.06    <0.06    <0.06     ") .f6     <0.06
                      <0.005   <0.005   <0.005   <0.005   <0.005   <0.005    <0.!H35    <0.005
                      <0.001   <0.001   <0.001   <0.001   <0.001   <0.001    <  .001    <0.001
                       0.012    0.017    0.012   <0.005    0.012    0.013    
-------
        ecology  and environment, inc.
        lm«m»nor* Sp«ciaMn in Ih. Environment
                             LABORATORY REPORT
                                      FOR
                                    Sapp  Battery
     Job No.:        U-2565                    RE:   FM-2140
     Sample Date:    11/2,4/85                 Sampled  By:     E  &  E,  Inc.
     Date Received:  11/5/85                   Delivered  By:   Federal  Exp> >ss
     Sample Type:    Water Grab
E i E Lab Number  85-  7756    Blank     7757      7758      7759      7760     7761     77
Custome- Number       FGW-01            FRW-D?    FGW-03   FGW-04   FGW-O'j    FGW-07   FGW
                                                 results  in  mg/L
Al urn in tin
Antimony
Arsenic
Cadmium
Lead
Manganese
Nickel
Selenn:n
<0.2     <0.2    <0.2     <0.2      <0.2      <0.2      <0.2
<0.06    <0.06   <0.06    <0.06     <0.06     <0.06     <0.06
<0.005   <0.005  <0.005   <0.005    <0.005        <0.005
<0.001   <0.001  <0.001   <0.001    
-------
         -|jn ecology and environment, inc.
             International Scwctafcsts m the Environment
                                   LABORATORY REPORT
                                      FOR
                                    Sapp Battery
     Job No.:        U-2565                   RE:  FM-2140
     Sample D*te:    11/2,4/85                Sampled  By:     E  i  E,  Inc.
     Date Received:  11/5/85                  Delivered By:   Federal  Express
     Sample Type:    Water Grab
E i E Lab Number  85-  7777     7778     7779     7780      7781     7782      7'83     7784
Customer Number       FGW-22   FGW-26   FGW-27   FGW-28   DGW-28   FGW-29   FG^-30   GWBB-01
                                                 results  in mg/L
Al jninum
Antimony
Arsenic
C adm i urn
Lead
Manganese
Nickel
Selenium
<0.2     <0.2     <0.2     <0.2      0.248    <0.2
<0.06    <0.06    <0.06    <0.06    <0.06     <0.06
<0.005   <0.005   <0.005   <0.005   <0.005    <0.005

-------
           ecology and environment, inc.
           Innmmorw SMCWttU « in. Enwonnwnt


                                LABORATORY REPORT

                                       FOR

                                     Sapp Battery




      Job No.:        U-2565                    RE:   FM-2140

      Sample- Date:    11/2,4/85                 Sampled  By:     E &  E,  Inc.

      Date Received:  11/5/85                   Delivered  By:   Federal  Expres1

      Sample Type:    Water Grab

E & E Lab Number  85-  7770     7771     7772      7773      7774      777b      777b

Customer Number       FGW-14   FGW-15   FGW-17  FGW-18   FGW-19    FGW-20   Fuw-21

                                             results  in  mg/L


Aluminum              <0.2     <0.2     <0.2     <0.2     <0.2      <0.2     -0.2

Antimony              <0.06    <0.06    <0.06    <0.06    <0.06     <0.06     <0.06

Arsenic               <0.005   <0.005   <0.005  <0.005   <0.005    
-------
                                                               U-2565
QUALITY CONTROL  FOR  ACCURACY:   PERCENT RECOVERY
            FOR  SPIKED  WATER  SAMPLES
Element
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Cadmium
Lead
Manganese
Nickel
Selenium
E & E
Laboratory
No. 85-
7759
7776
7759
7776
7759
7776
7759
7776
7776
7759
7776
7759
7776
7759
7776
Original
Value

<200
<200
<60
<60
<5
<5
<1
<1
1.8
35
<15
<20
31
<5
<5
Amount
Added
(ug/L)
2000
2000
500
500
20
20
5
5
20
200
200
400
400
10
10
Amount
Determined

1582
2210
578
503
16.0
23.5
4.78
5.57
38.5
186
215
312
428
6.7
11.4
Percent
Recovery
79.1
110
116
101
80.0
118
95.6
111
186
75.5
108
78.0
99.2
67.0
114
                  F-12

-------
                                                                              U-2565
                              QUALITY  CONTROL  FOR PRECISION
                            RESULTS OF  ANALYSIS Of RF.PUCATE
                                ANALYSES  OF  WATER SAMPLES
Element
Ant imony
Aluminum
Arsenic
Cadmium
Lead
Manganese
Nickel
Selenium
E 4 E
Laboratory
No. 85-
7759
7776
7759
7776
7759
7776
7759
7776
7759
7776
7759
7776
7759
7776
7759
7776
Original
Analysis
<0.06
<0.06
<0.2
<0.2
<0.005
<0.005
<0.001
<0.001
<0.005
0.010
0.035
<0.015
<0.02
<0.02
<0.005
<0.005
Replicate
Analysis
<0.06
CO. 06
<0.2
<0.2
<0.005
<0.005
C0.001
<0.001
0.024
<0.005
0.035
<0.015
<0.02
0.031
<0.005
<0.005
Relative
Percent
Difference
RPO
~
..
—
—
—
0.0
—
--
                                           F-ll
recycled paper
                                                                         tT<>l<*K* timl rminmmrni

-------
 ecology uiid  environment, inc.
 SUHE 205. 2574 SEACiAlE UI1IVE, I AUAIIAV.I f. ri OIIIDA 37.101, TFL 90-1 R77 19'R
 International Sp«CiAti919 in th« Environment


May 14.  1986
Mr. Brent llartsfield
Bureau of Operations
Florida Department of Environmental
   Regulation
2600 Blair Stone Road
Tallahassee.  FL  32301

RE:  SAPP BATTERY FEASIBILITY STUDY:   2ND ROUND OF RESIDENTIAL
     WELL SAMPLING RESULTS

Dear Brent:

Attached are the results and respective QA/QC data of tde analytic^'  work
for residential well samples taken March 12-13. 1986.  Sample idenl '..ies
and a summary of the detected metal  species are also attached.

In comparison to the earlier lead data, these results follow the s^•>'
general trend as specified in the draft Sapp field report, where t>
highest lead concentrations are showing up southeast of the site.
Furthermore, the Lester Ellerbee. Carl Dilmore. and James Burdesha^1
residence wells have elevated lead levels on the order of 0.010 to '.020
ppm in comparison to the last sampling round.

When E i E finalizes the draft Sapp Summary Report,  these data will hi?
incorporated in the residential well section.

Please call  if you  have any questions  HI reference to this work.

Yours  truly,

ECOLOGY AND  ENVIRONMENT, INC.
 Pi- hard  J.  Rudy
 l!y Irogeologist
  JR/liif
 cc:   J.  Paul Oxer
                                 F-14

-------
                                                                          U-2565
                                QUALITY CONTROL FOR ACCURACY:
                     PERCENT DIFFERENCE—EPA QUALITY ASSURANCE MATERIALS
Element
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Cadmium
Lead
Manganese
Nickel
Selenium
Concentrat ions
Known
729
101.5
101.5
26.7
26.7
3.5
3.3
42.7
348
207
50.2
50.2
in uq/L
Determined
761
102.7
100.7
29.1
28.5
3.44
3.16
41.6
353
215
37.4
37.9
Percent
Difference
4.4
1.2
0.8
8.9
6.7
4.2
4.2
2.6
1.4
3.9
25.5
24.5
            Note:  These results are within the 95% confidence  interval  for  these
                   parameters.
                                            F-13
recycled paper

-------
                              MEMORANDUM




TO:                   Rick Rudy

FROM:                 Gary Hahn J/-( Itt'->

DATE:                 April 21, 1986

SUBJECT:              Sapp Battery Report;  Job  U-3048

CC:                   Lab File, QA/QC File
Attached is the laboratory report of  the  analysis  conducted  on  twentj -
nine samples received at the Analytical Services Center  on March  17,
1986.  Analysis was performed according to  the  procedures set forth  in
U.S. EPA Contract Laboratory Program,  Inorganic Statement of Work,
1984.

All samples, on which this report is  based, will be  retained by E &  E
for a period of 30 days from the date  of  this report,  unless otherw;e
instructed by the client.  If additional  storage of  samples  Is
requested by the client, a storage fee of Sl.OO/sample container  pti
month will be charged for each sample, with such charges  accruing
until destruction of the samples is authorized  by  the  client.
GH/cp
enclosure
                                  F-16

-------
                                   ',AIT HAI III'/  M II
                           '.IIMIIAK i  (II  III III I I |i [II I /\|  M'l 1. I I. j
S.imple  Identity                        | ,,,,,(     M.IMCI.IIIPSP      Aluminum

HGW-01  Carl  Dilmore Residence        0.071
IIGW-02  Joseph Duncan Residence
HfiW-Ol  ,1,-lMiPS RtirdnMinw Ho-. i <|rm< o      (l.lllfi
IIGW-04  Salem Baptist Churdt                     O.IMfl          <0.
..Kim i inn
IU5W-05  Jansenius  Residence
HGW-07  George  Grooms Resiflencr
IIGW-08  James  Barnes Residence                   0.090
IIGW-09  Richard Bush Resid(?nro        (I. HI?                      0.261
HGW-10  Vester  Davis Residence  '     O.OOG
MGW-11  Lester  Ellerbee labernacle   0.009
HGW-12  Lester  Ellerbee Residpnce     0.071      0.1Z5          0.30?
                                       O.nP. IU     0. 12UU         0.200U
HGW-I3  Roscoe  Kent Residence                                    0.205       O.OO/
MGW-l't  Bill  Stoii"liiirgr>r  KP-; nlnurp
IIGW-1R  Rufus  Mayo Residence          O.fW/
IIGW-1/  Harold Williams Residence     U.UUb
IIGW-18  Carolyn Skipper Residence
HGW-19
IIGW-20
IIGW-21
IIGW-22
IIGW-26
MGW-27
IIGW-28
IIGW-29
IIGW-30
IIGW-jl
Jackie Farren Residence
Ue lores Brown Residence
Sandra Rowes Residence
William Casper Residence
James Braxter Residence
Amos Morris Residence
Charles Taylor Residence
A 1 ford Fire Department
Teresa Mayo Residence
Emmet Roark Residence

O.UD6
O.Wi
0.01)8
n.oo.s
O.OIJ/

(fliit Samp









led 2nd Round)

<0.200
0.219D
 NOIE:  Blank  spares repcesent  non-doLo. t«?(| insults and all  values are     parts
        per mi 11 ion (ppm).
                                       F-15
  recycled paper

-------
ecology and environment, inc.
  fratiix* SMCI*MTS m (ft« En
                    LABORATORY REPORT


Job No.:
Sample Date:
Date Received:
Sample Type:
E X. E Lab Number 86-
Customer Number

Al uminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Cadmium
Lead
Manganese
Nickel
Selenium


U-3048
3/12-13/86
3/17/86
Water
1808
HGW
07

<0.2
<0.06
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.015
<0.04
<0.005
FOR
Sapp Battery
RE: FM-2140
Sampled By: E & E, Inc.
Delivered By: Federal Express

1809 1810 1811 Prep Prep 312
Blank Blank
HGW HGW HGW 'GW
08 09 10 380 381 11
Results in mg/L
<0.2 0.261 <0.2 <0.2 — 
1
F-18
tilting* MM*I I IH ttofllllt <
0331 14






-------
      ecology and environment, inc.
                           LABORATORY REPORT
                                  FOR
                             Sapp Battery
 Job No.:        U-3048
 Sample Date:     3/12-13/96
 Date Received:   3/17/86
 Samp'ie Type:     Water
E Lab Number  86-   1302
            RE:   FM-2140
            Sampled By:     E  &  E,  Inc.
            Delivered  By:   Federal  F.xpre'.;
1803
1804
1805
1306
.307
Customer Number
Al iminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Cadmium
Lead
Manganese
Nickel
Selenium
HGW
01
<0.2
<0.06
<0.005
<0.005
0.021
<0.015
<0.04
<0.005
HGW
02
Resul
<0.2
<0.06
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.015
<0.04
<0.ons
HGW
03
ts in mg/L
<0.2
<0.06
<0.005
<0.005
0.016
<0.015
<0.04
<0.005
HGW
04
<0.2
<0.06
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
0.048
<0.04
<0.005
DHGW
04
0.215
<0.06
< 0.005
<0.005
<0.005
0.052
<0.04
<0.005
\'\V
05
.0,2
n.06
•0.005
'0.005
i1. 005
'0.015
0.04
•'1.005
 Analytical  References:
 U.S.  EPA Contract  Laboratory Progran,  Inorganic Statement of Work, ..T<4.
                                Supervising Analyst  V '\ j/i^) / ft',
                                Date:
                                   F-17
                                                                    03- > 14
recycled paper

-------
           ecology and environment, inc.
                                LABORATORY REPORT
                                      FOR
                                    Sapp Battery
     Job No.:         U-3048
     Sample Date:     3/12-13/86
     Date Received:   3/17/86
     Sample Type:     Water
E i E Lab Number  86-   1820
            RE:   FM-2140
            Sampled  By:     E  i E,  Inc.
            Delivered By:   Federal  Express
1821
1822
1823
1824
16 <'.
Customer Number
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Cadmium
Lead
Manganese
Nickel
Selenium
HGW
19
<0.2
<0.06
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.015
<0.04
<0.005
HGW HGW HGW
20 21 22
Results in mg/L

-------
       ecology and environment, inc.
       Imtmttantl Sc*c>lnu in ih
                             LABORATORY REPORT
                                  FOR
                                Sapp Battery
Job No.:         U-3048
Sample Date:     3/12-13/86
Date Received:   3/17/86
Sample Type:     Uater
RE:  FM-2140
Sampled By:     E  &  E,  Inc.
Delivered By:   Federal  Expresi
E & E Lab Number 86-
Customer Number

Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Cadmium
Lead
Manganese
Nickel
Selenium
1814
DHGW
12

0.268
<0.06
<0.005
<0.005
0.021
0.120
<0.04
<0.005
1815
HGW
13

0.205
<0.06
<0.005
0.007
<0.005
<0.015
<0.04
<0.005
1816
HGW
14
Results in
<0.2
<0.06
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.015
<0.04
<0.005
1817
HGW
15
mg/L
<0.2
<0.06
<0.005
<0.005
0.007
<0.015
<0.04
<0.005
1818
HGW
17

<0.2
<0.06
<0.005
<0.005
0.005
<0.015
<0.04
<0.005
18! )
HGW

<0 ?
<0 . '6
0.005
<'M'05
<0.>05
<0.015
<(.' . J4
n%iriMiiiit>ni

-------
                                                 U-3048
  QUALITY CONTROL FOR PRECISION
RESULTS OF ANALYSIS OF REPLICATE
    ANALYSES OF WATER SAMPLES
Element
Uuninun
Antimony
Arsenic
Codniint
Lead
Manganese
Nickel
Seleniun
E 4 E
Laboratory
No. 86-
1811
1829
1811
1829
1811
1829
1811
1829
1811
1829
1811
1829
1811
1829
1811
1829
Original
Analysis
<0.2
0.219
<0.05
<0.06
<0.005
<0.00^
<0.005

-------
       ecology and environment, inc.
                           LABORATORY REPORT
                                FOR
                              Sapp Battery
Job No.:        U-3048
Sample Date:     3/12-13/86
Date Received:   3/17/86
Sample Type:     Water
RE:  FM-2140
Sampled By:     E  & E,  Inc.
Delivered By:   Federal Express
E & E Lab Number 86-
Customer Number

Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Cadmium
Lead
Manganese
Nickel
Selenium
1826
HGW
28

<0.2
<0.06
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.015
<0.04
<0.005
1827
HGW
30

<0.2
<0.06
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.015
<0.04
<0.005
1828
HGW
31
Results
<0.2
<0.06
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.015
<0.04
<0.005
1829
DHGW
31
in mg/L
0.219
<0.06
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.015
<0.04
<0.005
1830
HGW
8B

<0.2
<0.06
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.015
<0.04
<0.005
Prep
Blank
382

<0.2
<0.06
—
<0.005
—
<0.015
<0.04
__
Prep
Blank
383

--
--
<0.005
--
<0.005
--
--
<0.005
Analytical  References:
U.S. ZPA Contract  Laboratory Program, Inorganic Statement of Work,  1984.
                              Supervising Analyst
                              Date:          ' '?".'./
           ,./"•;  •l*l\J(:r
      '• ;yc Irt p»p«r
                                    F-21
  recycled paper
                                                                inn)

-------
                                                               U-3048
                    QUALITY CONTROL FOR ACCURACY:
         PERCENT DIFFERENCE—EPA QUALITY ASSURANCE MATERIALS
Element
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Cadmium
Lead
Manganese
Nickel
Selenium
Concentrations
Known
729
729
101.5
101.5
26.7
26.7
39.0
39.0
42.7
348
348
207
207
10.9
10.9
in uq/L
Determined
709
841
B3.0
93.0
29.1
31.2
39.8
39.9
42.8
368
357
218
214
11.6
11.1
Percent
Difference
2.7
15.3*
18.2
8.4
9.0
16.8
2.0
2.3
0.2
5.7
2.4
5.3
3.4
6.4
1.8
Note:  These results are within the 95S confidence interval for these
       parameters.
                                F-24

-------
                                                                                        U-3048
                    QUALITY CONTROL FOR ACCURACY:  PERCENT RECOVERY
                                    FOR SPIKED WATER SAMPLES
Element
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Cadmium
Lead
Manganese
Nickel
Selenium
E 4 E
Laboratory
No. 86-
1811
1829
1811
1829
1811
1829
1811
1829
181t
1829
1811
1829
1811
1829
1811
1829
Original
Value

<200
219
<60
<60
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
6.0
<5.0
05
<15
<40
<40
<5.0
<5.0
Amount
Added
(ug/L)
2000
2000
500
500
20
20
50
50
20
20
200
200
400
400
10
10
Amount
Determined

1720
1678
481
468
18.7
20.1
59.8
50.5
28. J
18.7
208
203
405
405
10.6
10.4
"ercent
Recovery
86.0
7J.O
96.2
93.6
93.5
100
120
101
112
93.5
104
102
101
101
106
104
                                          F-23
recycled paper

-------
  r ecology and environment, inc.
    lm»rn«tMXx«l S
-------
                                 MONITORING WELL
                                   SAMPLE  DATA
                                        F-25
recycled pflpef                                                        ft-nlng* i«n«l

-------
                                                                     U-2681
QUALITY CONTROL FOR  ACCURACY:   PERCENT RECOVERY
                FOR  SPIKED  WATER  SAMPLES
clement
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Cadmium
le«d
Manganese
Selenium
E & E
Laboratory
No. 85-
8769
8764
8769
8762
8769
8769
8769
Original
Value

<200
<0.06
<5
<1
7.7
<15
<10
Amount
Added
(ug/l)
2000
120
25
2.5
25
200
25
Amount
Determined

2352
119.7
26.7
7.2
29.1
236
26.4
-srcent
•ecovery
118
99.8
107
128
86
118
106
                      F-28

-------
         ecology and environment, inc.
         Imtrninond SMcimtt in tr* Enviroomtm
                              LABORATORY REPORT
                                      FOR
                                   Sapp Battery
     Job No.:        U-2681
     Sample Date:    11/19-26/85
     Date Received:  12/2/85
     Sample Type:    Water Grabs
E & E Lab Number  85-   8765     8766
Customer Number        FEW-20C  FNW-06C
Al urn in in
Antimony
Arsenic
Cadmium
Lead
Manganese
Seleniun
11.8     52.8
<0.06    <0.06
<0.005   <0.005
0.006    <0.001
0.043    0.046
0.119    <0.015
<0.010   <0.010
     RE:  FM-2130
     Sampled By:    E & E,  Inc.
     Delivered By:  Federal Expn> -,

 8767     8768     8769     8770
FNW-21C  GWR-02   GWR-03    GW88-Cr
   all results in mg/L
56.5     <0.2     <0.2      <0.2
<0.06    <0.06    <0.06     <0.06
<0.005   <0.005   <0.005    <0.00t
0.001    <0.001   <0.001   <0.00.
0.022    0.028    0.008    <0.0l:!«
0.023    <0.015   <0.015   
-------
                                                               U-2681
                    QUALITY CONTROL FOR ACCURACY:
         PERCENT DIFFERENCE—EPA QUALITY ASSURANCE MATERIALS
Element
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Cadmium
lead
Manganese
Selenium
Concentrations
Known
729
101.5
26.7
3. JO
42.7
348
10.9
in ug/L
Determined
709
107.6
26.4
3.43
44.7
346
11.1
Percent
Difference
2.7
6.0
1.1
3.9
4.7
0.6
1.8
Note:   These results are within the 955 confidence interval for these
       parameters.
                               F-30

-------
                                                                               U-2681
                               QUALITY CONTROL FOR PRECISION
                             RESULTS OF ANALYSIS OF REPLICATE
                                 ANALYSES OF WATER SAMPLES
Compound
Aluminum
Ant imony
Arsenic
Caomiu.
Lead
Manganese
Selenium
E & E
Laboratory
No. 85-
8769
8769
8769
8769
8769
8769
8769
Original
Analysis
<200
<0.06
<5
0
7.7
<15
<10
Replicate
Analysis
<200

-------
    Njn ecology and environment, inc.
             *l Sp*ct*Mtl 
-------
                               MEMORANDUM




 TO:                   Rick  Rudy

 FROM:                 Gary  Hahn

 DATE:                 January 20,  1986

 SUBJECT:              Amended Sapp Battery Report, Job No. U-2700
Attached  is  the  amended  laboratory report of the analysis conducted cr
thirteen  samples  received  at  the Analytical  Services Center on
December  5,  1985.   Please  replace the incorrect page with the amende-]
one.  We  apologize  for any inconvenience th's "!ay have caused.
Analysis  was performed according to the procedures set forth  in U.S.
EPA Contract Laboratory  Program, Inorganic Statement of Work 1984.

All samples, on  which this report is based,  will be retained by E&E
for •, period of  30  days  from  the date of the original report, unless
otherwise  instructed by  the client.  If additional storage of sample:
is requested by  the client, a storage fee of Sl.OO/sanple container
per month  will be charged  for each sample, with such charges  accruing
until destruction of the samples is authorized by the client.
GH/cp
enclosure
                                   F-31
reCydCKJ P8p6f                                                 wulog* ami rn\ir»mni»'iii

-------
                                                                U-Z700
                     QUALITY CONTROL FOR  ACCURACY:
         PERCENT DIFFERENCE—EPA QUALITY ASSURANCE MATERIALS
Element
 Concentrations in uq/L


Known          Determined
                    Percent
                  Difference
AliMinum

Antimony

Arsenic

Cadiiu.

Lead


Manganese

Seleniui
729

101.5

26.7

39.0

42.7
42.7

348

10.9
744

96.1

28.4

45.7

43.3
40.9

352

o,2
2.0

5.3

6.4

17

1.4
4.2

1.1

16
                               F-34

-------
                                                                                U-Z700
                                QUALITY  CONTROL  FOR  PRECISION
                              RESULTS  OF  ANALYSIS  OF  REPLICATE
                                  ANALYSES  OF WATER  SAMPLES
Element
Aluminum
Ant iraony
Arsenic
Cadmium
Lead
Manganese
Selenium
E 4 E
Laboratory
No. 85-
8845
8845
8845
8845
8845
8845
8845
Original
Analysis
1.73
<0.6
<0.005
<0.005
0.368
0.030
<0.005
Replicate
Analysis
1.88
<0.6
<0.005
<0.005
0.357
0.028
<0.005
Relative
Percent
Difference
RPO
8.)
—
—
—
3.0
6.9
~
                                          F-33
recycled paper

-------
     'Ill)

         ecology and environment, inc.

         InMriwftonif SetcwMtl m tnt Env»onm«m




                              LABORATORY REPORT




                                      FOR



                                    Sapp Battery









     Job No.:        U-2723                   RE:  FM-2130



     Sample Date:    12/4-6/85                Sampled By:    E & E, Inc.



     Date Received:  12/7/85                  Delivered By:  Federal Expn ss



     Sample Type:    Water Composite



E & E Lab Number  85-   8939     8940     8941     8942     8943     8941



Customer Number        FEW-16C  FNW-06A  FNW-23C  DNW-23C  FPW-01   FPW-C;



                                         results in mg/L





Aluminun               285      1.04     3.53     7.76     0.809    1.12



Antimony               <0.06    <0.06    <0.06    <0.06    <0.06    <0.06



Arsenic                <0.05    <0.005   <0.005   <0.005   0.018    <0.00.



Cadmium                0.076    <0.005   0.007    <0.005   <0.005   0.026



Lead                   0.286    0.051    0.007    <0.005   1.83     1.50



Manganese              6.94     0.113    <0.015   0.033    2.46     0.17J



Seleniun               <0.05    <0.005   <0.005   <0.005   0.008    <0.0' f
     Analytical  References:


     U.S  EPA Contract Laboratory Program, Inorganic Statement of Work, 1'34.





                                    Supervising Analyst S/^<1 j-jfl^/") / , •

                                                            r\z    ^~~^
                                    Date:         l\f) ji/tA**, ^) /.
                                      F-36        i         .vi.i..r,	i,


                                                                       0   1«

-------
         ecology and environment, inc.
          ••rninonM SMcuian in th« Enwonnwit
                              LABORATORY REPORT

                                      FOR
                                    Sapp Battery
     Job No.:        U-2723
     Sample Date:    12/4-6/85
     Date Received:  12/7/85
     Samp^ Type:    Water Composite
E & E Lzb Number  85-   8933     8934
Customer Number        FEW-06B  FEW-07B
AT uminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Cadmium
Lead
Manganese
Seleniup
2.21     280
<0.06    <0.06
<0.005   <0.005
<0.005   0.032
0.015    0.509
0.025    17.4
<0.05    <0.05
     RE:   FM-2130
     Sampled By:    E & E, Inc.
     Delivered By:  Federal Express

 8935     8936     8937     893l~    Prep
FEW-08B  FEW-13A  FEW-13B  FEW-i V  Blank
   results in mg/L
10.4     2.58     1.38     1.59     <0.2
<0.06    <0.06    <0.06    <0.06    <0.06
<0.005   <0.005   <0.005   0.009    <0.005
<0.005   0.011    <0.005   <0.005   <0.005
0.761    0.168    0.149    0.061    <0.005
0.060    0.876    0.184    0.232    <0.015
<0.005   <0.005   <0.05    
-------
                                                                U-2723
                    QUALITY CONTROL FOR ACCURACY:
         PERCENT DIFFERENCE—EPA QUALITY ASSURANCE MATERIALS
Element
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Cadmium
Lead
Manganese
Selenium
Concentrationa
Known
729
101.5
26.7
39.0
42.7
348
10.9
in uq/L
Determined
816
104.1
28.4
42.5
42.0
372
9.50
Percent
Difference
11.9
2.6
6.4
9.0
1.6
6.9
12.8
Note:   These results are within the 95S confidence interval for these
       parameters.
                                F-38

-------
                                                                               U-272J
                                QUALITY CONTROL FOR PRECISION
                              RESULTS OF ANALYSIS OF REPLICATE
                                  ANALYSES OF WATER SAMPLES
        Compound
  E & E
Laboratory
 No. 85-
Original
Analysis
Replicate
Analysis
 Relative
 Percent
Difference
   RPO
        Manganese

        Aluminum

        Arsenic

        Saleniun

        Ant imony

        Lead

        Cadmium
  8944

  8944

  8944

  8944

  8944

  8944

  8944
 0.173

 1.12

 <0.005

 <0.005

 <0.06

 1.50

 <0.005
 0.155

 1.08

 <0.005

 <0.005

 <0.06

 1.44

 <0.005
   11.0

   3.6
   4.1
                                          F-37
recycled paper
                                                                               ami rmin»nm*'nt

-------
             ecology and environ men I, inc.
             Inttrrwtion* SMCUMU « IK* Environment
       Job No.:
       Sample Date:
       Date Received:
       Sample Type:
E i E Lab Number  85-
Customer Number
                                  LABORATORY REPORT
                                           FOR
                                      SAPP  BATTERY
  U-2737
  12/6-10/85
  12/11/85
  Water Grab
 9013     9014*
      HE:            FM-2130
      Sampled By:    E & E, Inc.
      Delivered By:  Federal Express
9015
9016
9017
9018
9i'19
                                                              Prep
FEW-03B  FNW-12A  FNW-21A  FNW-21B  FNW-22A  DNW-22A  POT-OS  Blank
                          Results in mg/L
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Cadmium
Lead
Manganese
Selenium
58.4
<0.06
<0.005
0.021
4.28
0.493
<0.5
                                 105      7.72
                                 <0.06   
-------
                                MEMORANDUM




  TO:          Rick Rudy

  FROM:        Gary Hahn/d^

  DATF:        January 6, 1986

  SUBJECT:     Sapp Battery Report; Job U-2737

  cc:          Lab file, QA/QC file
  Attached is the laboratory report of the analysis  conducted  on seven
  simples  received at the Analytical Services Center on  December 11,
  1985.   Analysis was performed according to the procedures  set fortu ,n
  U.5.  EPA Contract Laboratory, Inorganic Statement  of Work,  1984.

  All  samples, on which this report is based, will be retained by E I'< ''
  for  a  period of 30 days from the date of this report,  unless otherv'.e
  instructed by the client.  If additional storage of samples  is
  requested by the client, a storage fee of Sl.OO/sample container  pes
  month  will be charged for each sample, with such charges  accruing
  until  destruction of the samples is authorized by  the  client.
                                   F-39
recycled paper                                                II-<>|IIK> mill rmininmrni

-------
                                                               U-2737
                    QUALITY CONTROL FOR ACCURACY:
         PERCENT DIFFERENCE—EPA QUALITY ASSURANCE MATERIALS
Element
Aluninum
Antimony
Arsenic
Cadiiuo
Lead
Manganese
Selenium
Concentrations
Known
729
101.5
26.7
3.3
42.7
348
10.9
in uqA
Determined
713
101.0
27.8
3.43
39.2
353
9.7
Percent
Difference
2.2
0.5
4.1
3.9
8.2
1.4
11.0
Notei   These results are within the 958 confidence interval for these
       parameters.
                               F-42

-------
                             QUALITY CONTROL FOR PRECISION
                           RESULTS OF ANALYSIS OF REPLICATE
                               ANALYSES OF MATER SAMPLES
                                                                            U-2737
     Compound
  E 4 E
Laboratory
 No. SS-
Original
Analysis
Replicate
Analysis
                                                                       Relative
                                                                       Percent
                                                                      Difference
                                                                         RPD
     Antimony

     Arsenic

     Cadmium

     Lead

     Selenium
  9013

  9013

  9013

  9013

  9013
 <0.06

 C0.005

 0.021

 4.28

 <0.5
 <0.06

 <0.005

 0.022

 6.38

 <0.5
4.6

39.3
                                         F-41
recycled paper
                                                                                 l fmirmimrnt

-------
                              MEMORANDUM
TO.                 Rick Rudy

F,*OM:               Gary Hah

DATE:               January 17, 1986

SUBJECT:            Sapp Battery Report; Job No. U-2779

CC:                 Lab File, QA/QC File
Attached is the laboratory report of the  analysis conducted  on  one
sample received at the Analytical Services  Center on  December  13,
1985.  Analysis was performed according to  U.S. EPA Contract
Laboratory Program, Inorganic Statement of  Work 1984.   The submitte^
sample was filtered prior to analysis per your instructions.

.Ml samples, on which this report is based, will be retained by E&F
fo  a period of 30 days from the date of  this report,  unless other,v\  e
•r. -.tructed by the client.  If additional  storage of samples  is
isquested by the client, a storage fee of Sl.OO/sample container p^r
month will be charged for each sample, with such charges  accruing
until destruction of the samples is authorized by the  client.
GH/cp
enclosure
                                F-44

-------
                                                                                        .-2737
                  QUALITY CONTROL FOR ACCURACY:  PERCENT RECOVERY
                                  FOR SPIKED HATER SAMPLES
    Element
                             E & E
                           Laboratory
                            No. 85-
                                           Original
                                            Value
                              Amount
                              Added
                              (ug/L)
                             Amount
                          Determined
                                                          i'rrcent
    Antimony

    Arsenic

    Cadmium

    Lead

    Selenium
9015

9015

9018

9015

9017
<60

<5

1.1

29.2

<5
120

25

2.5

25

25
110

29.J

3.59

54.1

23.2
91.7

117

99.6

100

"2.8
                                          F-43
recycled paper
                                                                         CV»|I>K> mill rminiiimriii

-------
                                                               U-2779
                    QUALITY CONTROL  FOR ACCURACY!
         PERCENT DIFFERENCE—E"» QUALITY ASSMRANTF MTERIALS
Element
Aluninum
Arsenic
Manganese
Selenium
Concentrations
Known
729
26.7
348
10.9
in uq/L
Determined
749
28.8
330
10.5
Percent
Difference
2.7
7.9
5.2
3.7
Note:  These results ere within the 955 confidence interval for these
       parameters.
                                F-46

-------
    '•cology and environment,  inc.
           SpKWMtl in in* Environment
                          LABORATORY REPORT
                                  FOR
                              Sapp Battery
 Job  No.:         U-2779
 Sample Date:     12/12/85
 Date  Received:   12/13/85
 Sample Type:     Water Comp
 E & E Lab Number 85-
 Sample Identity

 Aluminum
 Antiiiony
 Arsenic
 Cadmium
 Lead
 Manganese
 Selenium
   Sampled By:    E & E,  Inc.
   Delivered By:  Federal  Expr"..'.

 9101           Prep
FNW-09A         Blank
  results in mg/L
16.6
<0.06
0.014
<0.005
0.463
0.687
<0.05
<0.2
<0.06
<0.005
<0.005
<0.1
<0.015
<0.005
Analytical References;
U.S. EPA Contract Laboratory Program, Inorganic Statement of  Work,  1934.
                                Supervising Analyst ^(JM^
                                date:
                                  F-45
                                                                    OS«I 14
recycled paper
                          niiil rmirmtniriii

-------
    ecology and environment, inc.
    lm*rnmcm*l SoKMtan m Ih* Envronm.ni
                         LABORATORY REPORT

                                 FOR
                               Sapp Battery
Job No.:        U-2689
Sample Date:    11/26-27/85
Date Received:  12/3/85
Sample Type:    Water
E & E Lab Number  85-       8806
Sample Identity


Aluminum
An'imony
Ar;,tnic
Cadmium
Lead
Manganese
Sele n'um
 FEW
 IOC
35.1
<0.06
<0.005
<0.005
0.257
6.98
<0.01
              RE:  FM-2130
              Sampled By:    E & E,  Inc.
              Delivered By:  Federal Expr-is
8807
DEW
IOC
8808
FEW
05B
8809
FEW
11C
                                    Prep
                                    Blank
 all resultsin mg/L
45.2     <0.2     5.01    <0.2
<0.06    <0.06    <0.06   <0.0«?
<0.005   <0.005   <0.005  <0.0f''>
<0.005   <0.005   <0.005  <0.0)j
0.290    0.010    0.021   <0.00
5.91     <0.015   2.24    <0.01S
<0.01    <0.01    <0.01   <0.01
Analytical References;
U.S. EPA Contract Laboratory Program,  Inorganic Statement of Work, 1 )84.
                               Supervising
                               Date:
                                            j
                                 F-48

-------
                               MEMORANDUM
TO:                 Rick  Rudy

FROM:               Gary  Hahn  M ^

DATE:               January  6,  1986

SUBJECT:            Sapp  Battery  Report;  Job  U-2689

CC:                 Lab File,  QA/QC  File
Attached is the  laboratory  report  of  the  analysis conducted on four
samples received at the Analytical  Services  Center on December 3,
1985.  Analysis  was performed  according  to  the procedures set forth •' i
U.S. EPA Contract Laboratory Program,  Inorganic Statement of Work,
1914.

All  .amples, on  which this  report  is  based,  will  be retained by E&E
for a period of  30 days from the date  of  this  report, unless otherwi-t
instructed by the client.   If  additional  storage of samples is
requested by the client, a  storage  fee of Sl.OO/sample container per
month will be charged for each  sample, with  such charges accruing
until destruction of the samples  is authorized by the client.
GH/cp
enclosure
                                   F-47
                                                                HIM! rmininnu-iti

-------
                                                               U-2689
                    QUALITY CONTROL FOR ACCURACY:
         PERCENT DIFFERENCE—EPA QUALITY ASSURANCE MATERIALS
                          Concentrations in uq/L

                                                              Percent
Element                  Known          Determined          Difference
Aluninun                 729               816                 11.9

Antimony                 101.5             96.1                5.3

Arsenic                  26.7              26.4                1.1

Cattail*                  39.0              45.7                17.2

Lead                     42.7              42.0                1.6

Manganese                348               372                 6.9

Selenium                 10.9              10.2                6.4
                                  F-50

-------
                                                                              U-2689
                              QUALITY CONTROL FOR  PRECISION
                            RESULTS Of ANALYSIS OF  REPLICATE
                                ANALYSES Of WATER  SAMPLES
Compound
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Cadiiun
Lead
Manganese
Selenium
E 4 E
Laboratory
No. 85-
8808
8808
8808
8808
3808
8808
8808
Original
Analysis
<0.2
<0.06
<0.005
<0.005
0.010
<0.015
<0.005
Replicate
Analysis
0.205
<0.06
<0.005
<0.005
0.0096
<0.015
<0.005
Relative
Percent
Difference
RPD
—
--
~
--
4.1
--
—
                                          F-49
recycled paper
                                                                                 ulltl ••mmMimrlK

-------
                              MEMORAN.  1
TO:                  Rick Rudy

FROM:                Gary Hahn

D4TI:                December 13.  1985

SUBJECT:             Sapp Battery  Report;  Job  No.  U-2566
Attached is the laboratory report of  the  analysis  conducted  on  one
hundred and thirty-six samples received at  the  Analytical  Services
Center on November 5, 1985.  Analysis  was performed  according  to U.L
F.PA Contract Laboratory Program,  Inorganic  Statement  of  Work,  1984.

Mil samples, on which this report is  based,  will  be  retained by E&E
for a period of 30 days from the  date  of  this report, unless otherw; ;.?
instructed by the client.  If additional  storage  of  samples  is
reauested by the client, a storage fee of Sl.OO/sample container pet
month will be charged for each sample, with  such  charges  accruing
until destruction of the samples  is  authorized  by the client.
GH/cp
enclosure
                                 F-52

-------
                         SOIL SAMPLE  ANALYTICAL  DATA
                                        F-51
recycled paper                                                         n-nliigt uml <-min>nniriu

-------
   ecology and environment, inc.
   InitmatKXWl Sp«ci*tmi tn tht 6nvwonm«ni
                         LABORATORY REPORT


                                 FOR

                               Sapp Battery
Job No.:
U-2566
Sample Date:    10/29-11/4/85

Oatt Received:  11/5/85

Sample Type:    Soil and Water
E & E Lab
  Number
Customer
 Number
7818
7819
7320
X821
7822
7823
7824
Prep Blank*
7825
7826
7827
7828
/829
/830
7831
7832
7833
7834
7835
FSS-10
FSS-11
FSS-12
FSS-13
FSS-14
FSS-15
DSS-15
--
FSS-16
FSS-17
FSS-18
OSS-18
FSG-45A
FSG-45B
FSG-45C
FSG-55A
FSG-558
FSG-55C
FSG-56A
                             pH. S.U.
                                38
                                21
                                04
                              3.99
                                11
                                94
                              5.76

                              4.?4
                              3.96
                              3.72
                              3.52
                              5.48
                              5.20
                                02
                                57
                              4.55
                              5.22
                              5.61
RE:  FM-2040

Sampled By:    E & E,  Inc.

Delivered By:  Federal Expr.- ;s
                                 Lead
                           mg/kg as  received

                                 2.15
                                 242
                                 56.1
                                 20.9
                                 8.62
                                 1670
                                 1760
                                <0.005
                                 76.4
                                 96.2
                                 179
                                 169
                                 68.2
                                 8.55
                                 3.99
                                 1870
                                 107
                                 59.0
                                 479
                          Solids  %
                             '3
                            •II
                            •it
                            62
                            /9


                             '9
                              4

                              0
                            02
                            14
                            ;'i
*mg 1
Analytical References;

U.S. EPA Contract Laboratory Program,  Inorganic  Statement of Work, 1:'84.
                                Supervising  Analyst  /£*
                               Date:
                                  F-54-

-------
                                MEMORANDUM
 TO:                   Rick  Rudy

 FROM:                 Gary  H

 DATE:                 January  21,  1986

 SUBJECT:              Amended  Sapp  Battery Report;  Job No. U-2566
 Attached is the amended  laboratory  report  of  the analysis conducted on
 one hundred and thirty-six samples  received  at the Analytical Service.!
 Center on November 5, 1985.   Please replace  the incorrect page with
 the attached amended page.  We  apologize  for  any inconvenience this
 may have caused.  Analysis was  performed  according to U.S.  EPA
 Contract Laboratory Program,  Inorganic  Statement of Work, 1984.

 All samples, on which this report  is  based,  will be retained by E&E
 for a period of 30 days  from  the date of  this report, unless otherw  .c
 instructed by the client.  If additional  storage of samples is
 requested by the client, a storage  fee  of  Sl.OO/sample container per
 month will be charged for each  sample,  with  such charges accruing
 until destruction of the samples is authorized by the client.
 GH/cp
 enclosure
                                 F-53
recycled paper                                                 mil..** HIM! i-n\in>niii<-iii

-------
[7  ecology and environment, inc.
   lm*m*t>on«4 Sptcirtm ft th« Environment
                        LABORATORY REPORT

                                  FOR

                                Sapp Battery
 Job No.:
U-2566
 Sample Date:    10/29-11/4/85

 Date Received:  11/5/85
Sample Type:

E & E Lab
  Number
                 Soil and Water
Customer
 Number
7801
7802
7803
7804
Prep Blank*
7805
7806
7807
7808
7809
7810
7811
7812
7813
7814
7815
7816
7817
FSB-05C
FSE-01A
DSE-01A
FSE-01B
--
FSE-01C
FSE-02A
FSE-02B
FSE-02C
FSS-01
FSS-02
FSS-03
FSS-04
FSS-05
FSS-06
FSS-07
FSS-08
FSS-09
                              PH, S.U.

                               4.28
                               4.66
                               4.89
                               4.66
                               4.27
                               4.55
                               4.47
                               4.37
                                 29
                                 91
                                 50
                               6.21
                                 00
                                 17
                                 29
                               4.31
                               4.56
RE:  FM-2040

Sampled By:    E & E, Inc.

Delivered By:  Federal F>press
                                 Lead
                           mg/kg as received

                                 13.8
                                 394
                                 332
                                 3.45
                                <0.005
                                 2.00
                                 13.2
                                 1.89
                                 95.9
                                 218
                                 3.59
                                 10.4
                                 97.9
                                 271
                                 3.04
                                 7.30
                                 13.5
                                 10.0
                          Solids %

                            86
                            73
                            73
                            86

                            92
                            83
                            86
                            89
                            86
                            82
                            94
                            90
                            87
                            92
                            82
                            79
                            81
 *mg/L
 Analytical  References:

 U.S.  EPA  Contract  Laboratory Program, Inorganic Statement of Work.  1984.
  ro, \cl""l IH
               Supervising Analyst

               Date: 	

               F-56
                                                                     A


                                                          i*-^rk\w- /

-------
     ecology and environment, inc.
                          LABORATORY REPORT

                                    FOR

                                  Sapp  Battery
   Job  No.:         U-2566

   Sample  Date:     10/29-11/4/85

   Date Received:   11/5/85
   Sample Type:

   t & E Lab
    Number

   Prep Blank*
     7785
     7786
     7787
     7788
     7789
     7790
     7791
     7792
     7793
     7794
     7795
     7796
     7797
     7798
     7799
     7800
 Soil and Water


              pH, S.U.
Customer
 Number
FSB-01A
FSB-01B
FSB-01C
FSB-02A
FSB-02B
DS8-02B
FSB-02C
FS8-03A
FSB-03B
FSB-03C
FSB-04A
FSB-04B
FSB-04C
FSB-05A
DSB-05A
FSB-058
                 36
                 07
                 17
                 86
                 74
                 64
                 02
                 02
               5.00
               4.97
               5.70
               4.75
               4.52
               5.17
                          RE:  FM-2040

                          Sampled By:    E & E,  [nc

                          Delivered By:  Federal  Express
               5.05
               4.28
      Lead
trig/kg as received

     <0.005
      43.2
      11.5
      2.57
      8330
      325
      746
      460
      66,100
      650
      400
      3780
      219
      128
      543
      654
      9.43
'.-jlids %
  86
  85
  84
  92
  87
  87
  77
  88
  91
  86
  90
  88
  85
  90
  91
  88
  *mg/L
  Analytical References:

  U.S. EPA Contract Laboratory  Program,  Inorganic Statement of Work, 1984.

                                  Supervising Analyst   X^-^k.

                                  Date: 	<^<2a^{]} 5. /'.'

                                  F-55
recycled paper
                                                               inttl fii*irtinim ril

-------
fj ecology and environment, inc.
  'ntt>ntnon« SpKMtets en tn* Envnonnwnt
                        LABORATORY REPORT

                                  FOR

                                Sapp  Battery
 Job  No.:         U-2566

 Sample  Date:     10/29-11/4/85

 Date  Received:   11/5/85

 Sample  Type:     Soil  and  Water
E &  E  Lab
  Number

   7854
   7855
   7856
   7857
   7858
   7859
   7860
   7861
   7862
   7863
   7864
Prep Blank*
   7865
   7866
   7867
   7868
   7869
   7870
   7871
   7872

*mg/L
Customer
 Number

FSG-86A
DSG-86A
FSG-86B
FSG-86C
FSG-87A
FSG-87B
FSG-87C
FSG-95A
FSG-95B
FSG-95C
FSG-96A

OSG-96A
FSG-968
FSG-96C
FSG-62A
FSG-62B
FSG-62C
FSG-64A
FSG-64B
pH, S.U.
  .77
  .80
  .58
  .23
  .87
  .39
  .86
  .27
  .35
  .37
 6.61
  ,72
  ,80
  ,77
 4.42
  ,20
  ,25
  ,73
 4.69
                          RE:  FM-2040

                          Sampled By:    E & E,  Inc.

                          Delivered By:  Federal  Express
      Lead
mg/kg as received        Sol ids %

      90,000              90
      22,300              88
      43,800              88
      46,700              88
      1180                92
      6090                82
      9430                80
      322                 92
      91.6                91
      115                 90
      16,100              89
     <0.005
      169,000             91
      96,600              86
      872                 87
      102                 91
      22.7                88
      6.34                87
      16,500              91
      818                 93
Analytical References:

U.S. EPA Contract Laboratory Program,  Inorganic Statement  of Work,  1984.
                               Supervising Analyst .
                Date:
                F-58
                                                            ^iL.  /?S
-------
  ecology and environment, inc.
  IrmnwionM SMCUkra m tfw Cnwonm«i(
                       LABORATORY REPORT

                                  FOR

                                Sapp  Battery
Job No.:
U-2566
Sample Date:     10/29-11/4/35

Date Received:   11/5/85
Sample Type:
E & E Lab
Number
7836
7837
7838
7839
7840
7841
7842
7843
7844
Prep Blank*
7845
7846
7847
7848
7849
7850
7851
7852
7853
Customer
Number
FSG-56B
FS6-56C
FSG-65A
FSG-65B
FSG-65C
FSG-66A
FSG-66B
FSG-66C
FSG-75A
—
DSG-75A
FSG-75B
FSG-75C
FSG-76A
FSG-75B
FSG-76C
FSG-77A
FSG-77B
FSG-77C
Soil  and Wa.ter


             pH.  S.U.
                                .15
                                .96
                                .34
                                .98
                                ,89
                                .74
                                .84
                                ,47
                              6.02
                                .73
                                .15
                                .18
                                .66
                                .47
                                .97
                                .44
                                .39
                              5.61
RE:  FM-2040

Sampled By:    E & E, Inc.

Delivered By:  Federal Excess
        Lead
  mg/kg as received       r»ol ids %

        20.2                78
        22.9                77
        201                 88
        220                 90
        564                 91
        14.1                91
        17.2                91
        6560                89
        511                 89
       <0.005
        591                 89
        50.6                82
        95.3                77
        3770                85
        8320                92
        25,300              89
        813                 90
        3940                90
        5120                86
*mg/L
Analytical References:

U.S. EPA Contract Laboratory Program,  Inorganic Statement of Work,  .984.
                                Supervising Analys
               Date:
               F-57
                                                       ^iiv      I'-
    paper
                                                             mill rmtnmtnrfii

-------
    ecology and  environment, inc.
    Irmrrunond SpKMfctt «! th» Enwonmani
                          LABORATORY REPORT

                                 FOR

                               Sapp Battery
Job Mo.:
U-2566
Sample Date:    10/29-11/4/85

Date Received:  11/5/85

Sample Type:    Soil and Water
E & E Lab
Number
'891
7892
7893
7894
7895
7896
7897
7898
7839
7900*
7901*
7902*
7903*
7904*
7905*
Customer
Number
FSG-91A
FSG-91B
FSG-91C
FSG-53A
FSG-53B
FSG-53C
FSG-54A
FSG-548
FSG-54C
SBB-02
SBB-03
SBB-04
FSR-02
FSR-03
FSR-04

pH, S.U,
4.20
4.63
4.59
5.25
6.17
5.10
4.75
4.92
4.65
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
*mg/L

NR-Analysis Not Requested
RE:  FM-2040

Sampled By:    E & E, Inc.

Delivered By:  Federal Expres;
                                                 Lead
                                           mg/kg as received

                                                 636
                                                 342
                                                 258
                                                 2260
                                                 16,700
                                                 5310
                                                 177
                                                 17.6
                                                 53.9
                                                <0.01
                                                <0.01
                                                <0.01
                                                 0.029
                                                 0.155
                                                 1.48
                                                   Sol ds %

                                                     i!>
                                                     !!4
                                                     \\-
                                                     '.0
                                                     )}'

                                                     d'C
                                                     NK
                                                     N'
Analytical References:

U.S. EPA Contract Laboratory Program,  Inorganic Statement  of  Work,  19fl.
                               Supervising

                               Date:
                                  F-60
                         •7       <\
                                                                    O'.-l '4

-------
      ecology and environment, inc.
      mammon* Sotcmm «tfl« Enyironmtnr
                           LABORATORY REPORT

                                     FOR

                                   Sapp Battery
    Job  No.:
U-2566
    Sample  Date:     10/29-11/4/85

    Date  Received:   11/5/85
    Sample  Type:
Soil and Water
E i E Lab
Number
7873
7874
7875
7876
7877
7878
7879
7880
7881
7882
7883
7884
Prep Blank*
7885
7886
7887
7888
7889
7890
Customer
Number
FSG-64C
DSG-64C
FSG-71A
FSG-71B
FSG-71C
FSG-73A
FSG-73B
DSG-73B
FSG-73C
FSG-82A
FSG-82B
FSG-82C
—
FSG-84A
FSG-84B
FSG-84C
FSG-85A
FSG-85B
FSG-85C
                                 PH.  S.U.
                                  4.
                                  4.
               .82
               .91
              4.54
              4.41
              4.56
              4.52
              4.95
               .45
               .98
               .18
               .68
                                  4.
                                  4.
                                  5.
                                  4.
                                  4.75
                                  3.95
                                  4.09
                                  4.33
                                  5.35
                                  6.12
                                  5.55
RE:  FM-2040

Sampled By:    E & E,  Inc.

Delivered By:  Federal Ext.
        Lead
  mg/kg as received        3olids

        230                  93
        187                  93
        1680                 84
        212                  90
        601                  87
        37.2                 93
        27.8                 93
        63.3                 92
        20.4                 91
        8301                 83
        17.0                 85
        17.2                 86
       <0.005
        336                  89
        163                  89
        141                  87
        1790                 91
        267                  92
        57.5                 89
   *mg/L
   Analytical References:

   U.S. EPA Contract  Laboratory Program, Inorganic Statement  of  Work,  .984.
                                                          ^j      yJ- /
                                   Supervising Analyst   /S't<• i i  /W U~
                                                                     01.114
recycled paper
                                                                 it i-mirt.niitt-Mi

-------
                                                  U-2566
   QUALITY CONTROL FOR PRECISION
 RESULTS OF ANALYSIS OF REPLICATE
ANALYSES OF WATER AND SOIL SAMPLES
Element
Antimony


Cadmiun


Lead





pH











E & E
Laboratory
No. 85-
7839
7895
7904
7839
7895
7904
7812
7839
7B68
7904
7795
7895
7794
7804
7814
7824
7836
7846
7856
7867
7877
7887
7897
7905
Original
Analysis
<12
31.5
<0.06
<1
<1
<0.005
97.9
220
102
0.155
3780
16,700
4.97
4.66
4.17
5.76
5.15
6.15
6.58
5.77
4.56
4.33
4.75
1.49
Replicate
Analysis
<12
2J.7
<0.06
<1
<1
<0.005
116
121
101
0.149
4630
11,100
4.99
4.63
4.44
5.74
5.12
6.12
6.64
5.75
4.60
4.36
4.43
1.51
Relative
Percent
Difference
RPD

28.3
—
„
„
«
16.9
58.1
0.9
3.9
20.2
42.6
0.4
0.6
6.3
0.3
0.6
0.5
0.9
0.3
0.9
0.7
9.1
1.3
             F-62

-------
      ecology and environment, inc.
      mammon* SCMCMMCI « mt tmmnmtm
                           LABORATORY REPORT


                                    FOR

                                  Sapp Battery
   Job  No.:
U-2566
   Sample  Date:     10/29-11/4/85

   Date Received:   11/5/85

   Sample  Type:     Soil  and Water
RE:  FM-2040

Sampled By:    E & E, Inc.

Delivered By:  Federal Express
  E & E Lab Number 85-
          7825
          7826
          7827
          7828
          Blank*
          7894
          7895
          7896
          7897
          7898
          7899
          7900*
          7901*
          7902*
          7903*
          7904*
  »mo/L
            Customer Number
               FSS-16
               FSS-17
               FSS-18
               OSS-13

               FSG-53A
               FSG-53B
               FSG-53C
               FSG-54A
               FSG-54B
               FSG-54C
               SB8 02
               S8B 03
               3BB 04
               FSR 02
               FSR 03
         Antimony
Cauiium
                                                       mgAg as received
           <0.06
   0.005
           31.5
           18.7
<0.06
<0.06
<0.06
<0.06
<0.06
--0.005
<0.005
<. .005
'3.005
•0.005
  Analytical References:

  U.S. EPA Contract Laboratory Program,  Inorganic Statement of Work, IJ34.
                                                                   . ,'    I

                                  Supervising Analyst.-  ' ^ '] / l<* '?"> ;

                                  Date:       ,;b 7f U. 4 ' '
         il paper
                                  F-61
                                        ..I.,,;, :„:,( , „.„	


                                                  03 '114
recycled pacer
                                                          rruli>g\

-------
                                                                U-2566
                    QUALITY CONTROL FOR ACCURACY:
         PERCENT DIFFERENCE—EPA QUALITY ASSURANCE MATERIALS
                          Concentrat lore in uq/L
Element
Antimony
Cadoiui
La«d









Known
101.5
39.0
435
42.7
42.7
42.7
42.7
42.7
42.7
42.7
42.7
42.7
Determined
123.6
41.9
448
44.4
41.4
40.4
40.0
43.8
45.1
41.0
40.5
39.1
Percent
Difference
21.7
7.4
3.0
4.0
3.0
5.4
6.3
2.6
5.6
4.0
5.2
8.4
Note:  These results «re within the 955 confidence interval for these
       parameters.
                               F-64

-------
                                                                                         U-2566
                    QUALITY CONTROL FOR ACCURACY:   PERCENT  RECOVERY
                               FOR SPIKED WATER AND SOIL SAMPLES




Element
Antimony


Cadniun


Lead





E & E
Laboratory
No. 85-
7839R*
7895R*
7904R*
7839R*
7895R*
7904R*
7839R»
786 8R»
781 2R»
7904R*
Original
Value



33.6
121
<60
<5
<5
<5
618
504
620
140
Amount
Added


(ug/L)
500
500
500
50
50
50
500
500
500
500
Amount
Determined



478
627
786
57.7
61.6
64.7
1104
1189
958
788
                                                                                        Percent
                                                                                        Recovery
                                                                                          88.9
                                                                                          101
                                                                                          157

                                                                                          115
                                                                                          123
                                                                                          129

                                                                                          97.2
                                                                                          1J7
                                                                                          67.6
                                                                                          1JO
•Results in ug/L because spiking  performed  during  digestion  procedure.
                                           F-63
 'ecvcied paper

-------
     ecology and environment, inc.
               Its 
-------
                               MEMORANDUM
 TO:                Rick Rudy

 FROM:               Gary Hahn

 DATE:               January 10, 1986

 SUBJECT:            Sapp Battery Report; Job U-2571

 CC:                Lab File, QA/QC File
 Attached is  the laboratory report of the analysis conducted on thirt\
 nine samples received at the Analytical Cervices Center on November  >
 1985.   Analysis was performed according to U.S. EPA Contract
 Laboratory Program, Inorganic Statement of Work, 1984.

 For  all  analyses,  the EPA Contract Required Detection Limits  (CRDL)
 we-e followed.   However, since many samples required dilutions to
 achieve the  EPC CLP spike protocol, the reported detection limits  m;"-
 vary.   All  dilution factors are on record.

 All  samples, on which this report is based, will be retained  by  EiE
 for  a  period of 30 days from the date of this report, unless  otherwi .,
 instructed by the  client.  If additional storage of samples  is
 requested by the client, a storage fee of Sl.OO/sample container per
 month  will  be charged for each sample, with such charges  accruing
 until  destruction  of the samples is authorized by the client.
 GH'cp
 enclosure
                                   F-65
•e(.vC!8d paoef                                                oiil««m mill i-minimnmi

-------
      -•cology  and environment, inc.
            PK*MII «i tfn Envuonmim
                          LABORATORY REPORT
                                 FOR
                               Sapp Battery
 Job  No.:
 Sample Date:
U-2571
11/4-5/86
Date Received:  11/6/85
Sample Type:    Soil and Water
RE:   FM-2040
Sampled By:     E & E,  Inc.
Delivered By:   Federal  Express
E & E Lab
Number
7963
7964
7965
7966
7967
7968
7969
7970
7971
7972
7973
Prep Blank*
7974*
7975*
Customer
Number
FSG-34A
FSG-348
FSG-34C
FSG-43A
FSG-438
FSG-43C
FSG-51A
DSG-51A
FSG-518
FSG-51C
EPA-1
--
SBB-06
FSR-05
Lead Antimony Cadmium
pH, S.U.
5.90
5.10
5.00
5.66
4.87
4.75
5.65
6.18
5.67
5.15
5.65
..
6.37
1.40
rag/kg
246
53.4
3.08
1740
690
690
19,200
22,700
84,200
15,300
<1
<0.005
<0.005
1.95
as received Solids %
<12 <1 
110 2.20 ?>•
16.7 <1 '.;
<12 <1 i'R
..
<0.06 <0.005 T<
<0.06 <0.005 M?
*mg/L
NR-Analysis Not Requested
Analytical References:
U.S. EPA Contract Laboratory Program, Inorganic Statement of Work,
                               Supervising Analyst^
                               Date:
                                 F-68
                                                                   03'. l 14

-------
     ecology and environment, inc.
     intwnwionii So*eiMiti in nw Envuontrwni
                           LABORATORY REPORT

                                   FOR

                                 Sapp Battery
Job No.:
Sample Date:
Date Received:
Sample Type:
E & E Lab
Number
7951
7952
7953
7954
7955
7J56
7J57
7958
7959
7960
7961
7962
Prep Blank*
U-2571
11/4-5/86
11/6/85
Soil and
Customer
Number
FSG-69B
FSG-69C
FSG-78A
FSG-788
FSG-78C
FSG-79A
FSG-798
FSG-79C
DSG-79C
FSG-88A
FSG-88B
FSG-88C
—



Water

pH, S.U
5.35
5.88
5.92
5.70
5.71
5.60
5.55
5.04
4.95
5.00
5.10
6.17
--
                                           RE:   FM-2040

                                           Sampled By:    E & E,  Inc.

                                           Delivered By:  Federal Express
                                                   Lead
                                             mg/kg as received

                                                   11.0
                                                   7.66
                                                   59.0
                                                   75.6
                                                   59.2
                                                   5.83
                                                   7.19
                                                  <5
                                                   46.7
                                                   45.5
                                                   5.35
                                                  <0.005
                                    Solids X

                                      37
                                      as
                                      '39
                                      "6
                                      ;<7
                                        4
                                    '    5
                                      uo
                                      '•'3
                                      13
                                      10
 »mg/L
 Analytical References;

 U.S. EPA Contract  Laboratory Program,  Inorganic Statement of Work,  H'
Supervising Analyst

Date:        /b- lU Uf.-^,  -I/ 6 ,  f>£7 <.''••'
                                                                      If H
    t*ry l***t (*
                                    F-67
             ./
M	
                                                                       O.i .
recycled caper
                                                                 lltlll

-------
            QUALITY CONTROL FOR ACCURACY:  PERCENT RECOVERY
                        FOR SPIKED SOIL SAMPLES
                                                               U-2571
Element
              £ 4 E
            Laboratory
             No. 85-
                          Original
                           Vtlue
                         Anoint
                         Added
                         (ug/L)
                       Amount
                     Determined
                                   Percent
                                   Recot*ry
Antimony
7962 R
7975 R
                            <60
            500
            500
            307
            547
              61
             109
Cadmium
7962 R
7975 R
                            <5
            50
            50
            49
            68,0
              98
             136
Lead
7952 R*
7962 R*
7975 R
31.5
35.3
1942
50
50
500
84.0
49.6
2276
105
 29
 67
•Results in ug/l beceuM ipiking perforated during digtetion procedure.
                                  F-70

-------
                                          U-2571
   QUALITY CONTROL  FOR  PRECISION
 RESULTS OF ANALYSIS  OF REPLICATE
ANALYSES OF WATER AND SOIL SAMPLES
Analysis
So Li da
pH
Antiaony
Cadmiua
Lead
E & E
Laboratory
No. 85-
7942
7952
7962
7972
7941
7949
7960
7973
7975
7973
7975
7952
7962
7973
7975
Original
Analysis
88
85
86
83
4.83
5.01
5.00
iiriu tn

-------
         ecology and environment, inc.
                     n tr>« Envnonmtm
                              LABORATORY REPORT

                                      FOR

                                   Sapp  Battery
  Job No.:         U-2601

  Sample ,)ate:     11/6-8/85

  Date Received:   11/13/85

  Sample Type:     Soil  and 4  Waters
E & E Lab
Number 85-
8197
8198
8199
3200
8201
3202
8203
8204
8205
8206
3207
3208
8209
8210
8211
8212
3213
8214
8215
8216
Prep Blank
168*
Sample
Identity
FSA-05A
FSA-058
DSA-05B
FSA-05C
FSA-050
FSA-05E
FSA-06A
FSA-06B
FSA-06C
FSA-060
FSA-06E
FSA-07A
FSA-07B
FSA-07C
FSA-070
FSA-07E
FSA-08A
FSA-08B
FSA-08C
OSA-08C
--


pH, S.U
5.93
4.91
4.95
4.77
4.32
4.33
6.10
6.07
4.86
4.77
4.65
6.95
5.05
4.81
4.43
4.53
6.79
4.74
4.11
4.46
--

     RE:   FM-2040

     Sampled By:    E i E,  Inc.

     Delivered  By:  Federal Express
                                    Antimony

                                      142
                                      857
                                      325
                                      148
                                      360
                                      208
                                      157
                                      71.2
148
799
74.8
86.5
<0.06
   Lead
   mg/kg
as received

   41,000
   111
   113
   74.8
   41.7
   29.1
   155,000
   57,000
   6560
   330
   928
   68,800
   45,900
   28,100
   4290
   1160
   30,100
   29,800
   12,300
   13,400
                                                                 Cadmium
                            2.79
                            1.07
                                                                  2.69
                                                                  <0.005
X Solids

   88
   83
   86
   88
   83
   83
   90
   85
   85
   84
   35
   84
   85
   79
   85
   81
   82
   79
   77
   77
*mg/L

  Analytical  References:

  U.S. EP/' Contract Laboratory Program, Inorganic Statement of Work,  1984.



                                 Supervising Analyst /IL^1^  'll'/")J//V-7. > 	

                                 Date:      * •/(V- Mfct  *3~),  ///T".._
                                        F-72
                                                                          OJI,

-------
                                                          U-2571
                           QUALITY CONTROL FOR ACCURACY:
                                PERCENT RECOVERY—
                          EPA QUALITY ASSURANCE MATERIALS
                 El
                              Concentration* In uq/l

                               Known     D*t«ntin«d
                           P«rc«nt
                           R«covtry
                 Antimony
 101. J
 101.5
103.8
101.1
2.3
0.39
                                39.0
                                39.0
              40.8
              42.3
                4.6
                8.5
                 Lead
  42.7
  42.7
  42.7
  42.7
 41.2
 42.1
 40.5
 39.1
3.5
1.4
5.2
8.4
                 NOTE:
rMult* *r» ttttnln th« 95* conft-
interval for th«M p«r«wt«r».
                                       F-71
ed caper
                                                                          mill i-tivirttiinii ill

-------
      ecology and environment, inc.
      International $|MCi«fc*n m th« Environment
Job No
Sample
.: U-2601
Date: 11/6-8/85
Rl
Si
Datfi Received: 11/13/85 D<
Sampl ^
E & E Lab
Number 85-
8237
8238
8239
8240
8241
8242
8243
8244
8245
8246
. 8247
8248
8249
8250
8251
8252
8253
8254
8255
8256
8257
Prep Blank
172*
Prep Blank
173*
*mg/L
Type: Soil and 4 Waters
Sample
Identity pH, S.U.
DSA-09A 7.03
FSA-09B 5.29
FSA-09C 5.56
FSA-09D 5.27
FSA-09E 5.33
FSA-10A 7.96
FSA-10B 7.46
FSA-10C 6.64
FSA-10D 6.37
FSA-10E 6.03
FSA-11A 7.89
FSA-11B 4.84
FSA-11C 4.75
FSA-11D 5.07
FSA-11E 5.11
FSE-04A 5.67
FSE-04B 5.58
FSE-04C 6.25
FSE-05A 5.95
FSE-05B 6.19
DSE-05B 6.22
—

—




Antimony
49.9
<12
<12
<12
<12
27.6
16.8
<12
<12
<12
24.2
13.5
45.5
<12
<12
<12
<12
<12
18.6
<12
<12
<0.06

--


Analytical References:
                           LABORATORY REPORT

                                    FOR

                                 Sapp Battery

                                         RE:   FM-2040

                                         Sampled  By:     E i E,  Inc.

                                         Delivered  By:   Federal  Express
                                                  Lead
                                                  mg/kg
                                               as  received

                                                  12,500
                                                  536
                                                  367
                                                  9.33
                                                  10.6
                                                  10,800
                                                  86
                                                  54
                                                  54.9
                                                  48.2
                                                  7710
                                                  4750
                                                  8140
                                                  547
                                                  190
                                                  62.9
                                                  7.13
                                                  6.86
                                                  300
                                                  23.3
                                                  19.8
                                                  <5*
Cadmium
                                                                <0.005
Solids

 83
 82
 75
 67
 66
 83
 76
 86
 84
 83
 81
 82
 70
 85
 87
 86
 77
 76
 76
 84
 82
U.S. EPA Contract Laboratory  Program,  Inorganic Statement of Work, 1984,
                                Supervising Anal yst.
                                Date:
                                                              1-1,
                                   F-74

-------
    hjjj ecology and environment, inc.
        InltmtnonM ScwcxMU « thf Cnmoomtnt
                             LABORATORY REPORT


                                      FOR

                                   Sapp  Battery
  Job No.:        U-2601

  Sample Date:    11/5-8/85

  Date deceived:  11/13/85

  Sample Type:    Soil and 4 Waters
RE:  FM-2040

Sampled By:    E & E,  Inc.

Delivered By:  Federal Expre-;
E i E Lab
Number 85-
8217
8218
8219
8220
8221
8222
8223
8224
8225
8226
8227
8228
8229
8230
8231
8232
8233
8234
8235
8236
Prep Blank
170*
Prep Blank
171*
Sample
Identity
FSA-08D
FSA-08E
FSA-01D
FSA-01E
FSA-02A
FSA-02B
FSA-02C
FSA-02D
FSA-02E
FSA-03A
FSA-038
FSA-03C
FSA-03D
FSA-03E
FSA-04A
FSA-04B
FSA-04C
FSA-04D
FSA-04E
FSA-09A
--

—


pH, S.U
4.81
4.49
5.40
5.74
4.49
4.65
4.60
4.76
4.87
4.88
4.45
4.65
4.72
4.24
6.94
5.35
5.57
5.09
5.17
6.75
—

—



Antimony
16.8
<12
<12
<12
<12
<12
<12
<12
<12
<.12
<12
<12
<12
<12
<12
<12
<12
<12
<1?
42~7
Lead
mg/kg
as received
4150
778
12.4
29.3
553
106
12.0
24.9
31.3
392
8.33
84.7
8.54
7.03
279
25.0
120
8.73
10.6
9390
                                                                  Cadmium
                                       <0.06
                         
-------
                              MEMORANDUM




TO:                   Rick Rudy

FROM:                 Gary Hahn

DATE:                 December 19, 1985-

SUBEJCT:              Sapp Battery Report; Job U-2575

CC:                   Lab File, QA/QC File
Attached is the laboratory report of the analysis conducted on thirt
nine samples received at the Analytical Services Center on November
7.19R5.  Analysis was performed according to U.S. EPA Contract
Laboratory Program, Inorganic Statement of Work, 1984.

All  .amples, on which this report is based, will be retained by E&E
for a period of 30 days from the date of this report, unless otherwi
instructed by the client.  If additional storage of samples is
requested by the client, a storage fee of Sl.OO/sample container per
month will be charged for each sample, with such charges accruing
until destruction of the samples is authorized by the client.
GH/cp
enclosure
                                  F-76

-------
        ecology and  environment, inc.
        Intimation* SDCCMMII m in* Enwonnwrn
                             LABORATORY REPORT
                                      FOR
                                   Sapp  Battery
 Job No.:        U-2601

 Sample Date:    11/6-8/85

 Date Received:  11/13/85

 Sample Type:    Soil and 4 Waters
          RE:  FM-2040

          Sampled By:    E & E, Inc.

          Delivered By:  Federal Expres:
E & E Lab
Number 85-
8258
8259
8260
8261
8262
8263
8264
8265
8266
8267
8268
8269
8270
8271
8272
8273
Prep
Blank 174*
Prep
Blank 176*
8274
8275
8276
8277
8278
Prep Blank
175*
Prep Blank
177*
Sample
Identity
FSE-05C
FSE-06A
FSE-06B
FSE-06C
FSL-01
DSL-01
FSL-02
FSE-03A
FSE-03B
FSE-03C
FSE-07A
FSE-073
FSE-07C
DSE-07C
FSE-08A
FSE-08B
—

..

FSE-08C
SBB-07*
FSR-07*
FSR 08*
FSR-09*
--

—


pH, S.U
6.44
5.68
6.67
6.55
6.89
6.88
6.88
6.61
6.79
6.73
5.68
5.96
6.35
6.34
2.66
3.15
--

.-

2.98
3.95
1.51
1.42
1.53
—

—

                                   Antimony
                                     14.4
                                     21.9
                                     51.0
                                     NR
                                     NR
                                     NR
                                     NR
                                     NR
                                     NR
                                     NR
                                     NR
                                     NR
                                     NR
                                     <0.06
                                     <0.06
                                     NR
                                     <0.06
                                     <0.06
                  Lead
                  mg/kg
               as received

                  61.7
                  283
                  9.80
                  6.25
                  3020
                  9670
                  27,500
                  174
                  6.39
                  <5
                  1110
                  46.1
                  4.81
                  3.89
                  216
                  170
                  <5

                  26.3
                  <0.001
                  1.77
                  0.059
                  0.051
                                                   <5
Cadmium
 NR
 NR
 NR
 NR
 NR
 NR
 NR
 NR
 NR
 NR
 <0.005
 0.007
 NR
 <0.005
 <0.005
*mg/L

 Analytical References:
 U.S. EFA Contract Laboratory Program,  Inorganic Statement of Work, 1984

                                 Supervising Analyst 'JI&U.1
% Solids

   84
   76
   83
   82
   78
   79
   32
   76
   81
   80
   89
   87
   86
   36
   85
   77
    79
    NR
    NR
    NR
    NR
Date:
                                          9
    recycled caper
                                                              retting* iHUl

-------
                              MEMORANDUM




TO:                   Rick Rudy

FROM:                 Gary Hahn M\ ^'^

DATE:                 January 17, 1986

SUBcJCT:              Amended Sapp Battery Report; Job U-2575

CC:                   Lab File, QA/QC File
Attached is a amended laboratory report page of the analysis conduc!'?:
on thirty- nine samples received at the Analytical Services Center on
November 7,1985.  Please replace the incorrect page with the attache*
amended page.  We apologize for any inconvenience this may have
caused.  Analysis was performed according to U.S. EPA Contract
Laboratory Program, Inorganic Statement of Work, 1984.

All samples, on which this report is based, will be retained by EiE
for a period of 30 days from the date of the original report, unless
otherwise instructed by the client.  If additional storage of sample,
is requested by the client, a storage fee of Sl.OO/sample container
per month will be charged for each sample, with such charges accruing
until  destruction of the samples is authorized by the client.
GH/cp
enclosure
                                 F-78

-------
          ••oology and environment, inc.
          im«m«oon» SMCIM«» m th4 Environment
                               LABORATORY REPORT

                                       FOR

                                  Sapp  Battery
     Job No.:
U-2575
     Sample Date:     11/5-6/85

     Date Received:   11/7/85

     Samp"(e Type:     Soil  and Water
E & E Lab
  Number

   7984
   7985
   7986
   7987
   7988
   7989
   7990
   7991
   7992
   7993
   7994
   7995
   7996
   7997
   7998
   7999
   8000
   8001
Prep Blank*
    163
Customer
 Number

ESB 06A
ESB 068
ESB 06C
FSG 15A
FSG 158
FSG 15C
FSG 24A
FSG 248
FSG 24C
FSG 25A
FSG 258
FSG 25C
FSG 97A
FSG 978
FSG 97C
FSC 01A
FSC 018
DSC 018
PH. S.U.

 6.73
        ,77
        .90
        .41
        .39
        .11
                            4.67
                              21
                              23
                              13
                              11
                              04
                             7.03
                              78
                              50
                            8.54
                            7.26
                            7.61
                                               RE:   FM-2040

                                               Sampled  By:     E & £,  Inc.

                                               Delivered  By:   Federal  Express
                                         Antimony      Lead     Cadmium
                                              mg/kg  as  received
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
<12
<12
<12
-.
5300
3260
42.0
11.9
4.63
3.75
26.1
8.73
10.1
22.0
5.87
5.63
3640
29,600
5,010
257
20.6
16.6
<0.005
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
<1 .0
<1.0
<1.0
—
                                                    Sdids  %
                                                                           fcfi
                                                                           86
                                                                           '  I
                                                      "7
                                                      .'5
                                                      J8
                                                      -8
                                                      36
                                                      :8
                                                      37
*mg/L

NR-Ana1ys
-------
                                                                        U-2575
                        QUALITY CONTROL FOR PRECISION
                      RESULTS OF ANALYSIS OF REPLICATE
                     ANALYSES OF WAFER AND SOIL SAMPLES
                                                                  Relative
                  E & E                                           Percent
                Laboratory       Original        Replicate        Difference
Analysis         No. 8*-         Anal/sis        Analysis            RPO


pH                7987            5.41            5.37               0.7
                  8003            5.61            5.68               1.2
                  8014            5.44            4.51               18.7

Solida            7993            86              85                 1.2
                  8004            89              88                 1.1
                  8014            88              89                 1.1

Antimony          8014            <12             <12

Cadmium           8014            <1              <1

Lead              7990            26.1            23.8               9.2
                  8014            3.98            3.47               14
                  8021            7120            7210               1.2
                                    F-80

-------

         ecology and environment, inc.

         m *ma(ton«i So*etatwts tn th« En
                              LABORATORY REPORT


                                      FOR

                                  Sapp Battery
     Job Mo.:
       U-2575
     Sample Date:    11/5-6/85

     Date Received:  11/7/85

     Sample Type:    Soil and Water
                   RE:  FM-2040

                   Sampled By:    E & E,  Inc.

                   Delivered By:  Federal  Expres:
E & E Lab
  Number
Customer
 Number
PH. S.U.
Antimony    Lead     Cadmium
      mg/kg as received
8002
8003
8004
8005
8006
8007
8008
8009
8010
8011
8012
8013
8014
Prep Blank
165*
8015
8016
8017
8018
8019
8020
8021*
8022*
Prep Blank
166*
Prep Blank
167*
FSC QIC
FSC 02A
FSC 028
FSC 02C
FSG 14A
FSG 14B
FSG 14C
FSG 23A
FSG 238
FSG 23C
DSG 23C
FSG 33A
FSG 338
—

DSG 338
FSG 33C
FSA 01A
DSA 01A
FSA 01B
FSA QIC
FSR 06
SBB 05
• --

--

                              10
                              61
                              20
                              25
                              25
                              52
                              32
                              75
                              84
                              53
                              49
                              71
                              44
                              19
                              97
                              62
                              48
                              21
                              97
                              25
<12
169
<12
<12
<12
<12
<12
<12
17.3
<12
<12
<12
<12
6.54
8810
62.5
24.0
15.5
4.54
7.00
3060
4790
5710
4710
81.4
3.98

-------
                                                               U-2575
                    QUALITY CONTROL FOR ACCURACY:
         PERCENT DIFFERENCE—EPA QUALITY ASSURANCE MATERIALS
Element
Antimony
Cadmium
Lead
Concentrations
K no 1*1
101.5
39.0
42.7
42.7
42.7
in uq/L
Determined
99.2
42.7
42.1
38.9
44.4
Percent
Difference
7.3
9.5
1.4
8.9
4.0
Note:  These results are within the 958 confidence interval for  these
       parameters.
                                 F-82

-------
                                                                                            U-2575
                      QUALITY CONTROL FOR ACCURACY:  PERCENT RECOVERY
                                 FOR SPIKED HATER AND SOIL SAMPLES
                                               Original        Amotxit         Amount
                                                Value          Added        Determined
                                 E & E         	
                               Laboratory                                                  Percent
       Analysis                 No. 85-                        (ug/L)                       Recovery
        Antimony                 SOUR          <60            300             263            52.6

        Cadmiui                   SOUR          <5             50              45.4           90.8

        Lead                      7990R          120            500             796            135
                                 B014R          5.1            50              50.1           90.0
                                 8021R          7210           500             7730           104
                                            F-81
recycled paper                                                             ,->,,\,,^ „>»( .•n»ir,,mm-Mi

-------
                              MEMORANDUM




TO:                   Gerry Gallagher

FROM:                 Gary Hahn ..' //'M'

DATE:                 February 4, 1986

SUBJFCT:              Sapp Battery Report; Job U-2817

CC:                   Lab File, QA/QC File
Attached is the amended laboratory report of the analysis conducted  ro
fifty- three samples received at the Analytical Services Center on
January 9 and 13, 1986.  The original did not contain  results  for your
sanple labelled FSB-030.  Analysis was performed according  to  the
procedures set forth in U.S. EPA Contract Laboratory Program,
Inorganic Statement of Work, 1984.

All samples, on which this report is based, will be retained by E &  E
for a period of 30 days from the date of this report,  unless otherwise
instructed by the client.  If additional storage of samples  is
requested by the client, a storage fee of Sl.OO/sample container per
month will be charged for each sample, with such charges accruing
until destruction of the samples is authorized by the  client.
GH/cp
enclosure
                                  F-84

-------
                               MEMORANDUM

 TO:                    Gerry Gallagher

 FROM:                  Gary Hahn -J/M^'

 DATE:                  January 31, 1986

 SUBJECT:               Sapp Battery Report; Job U-2817

 CC:                    Lab File, QA/QC File
Attached  is  the laboratory report of the analysis conducted on  fifty-
three  samples  received  at  the Analytical Services Center on January  o
and  13, 1986.   Analysis was performed according to the procedures  set
fo'-t'rt  in  U.S.  EPA Contract Laboratory Program, Inorganic Statement of
Work,  1984.

All  samples, on which  this report is based, will be retained  by E  &  -1
for  a  period of 30 days from the date of this report, unless  otherwise
Instructed by  the client.   If additional storage of samples is
requested by the client,  a storage fee of Sl.OO/sample container per
month  will be  charged  for  each sample, with such charges accruing
until  destruction of the samples is authorized by the client.
GH/co
enclosure
                                   F-83
recycled paper                                                ••• ••!"«» «»«l

-------
    ecology and environment, inr,
    international Spvcwfetts m tt»t Environmant
                          LABORATORY REPORT


                                  FOR

                              Sapp Battery
Job No.:
Sample Date:
Date Received:
Sample Type:
E & E Lab
Number 86-
0256
0257
G258
U259
0260
0261
0262
0263
0264
0265
0266
0267
0268
Prep Blank*
0269
0270
0271
0272
0273
0274
U-2817
10/31-11/5/85
1/9,13/86
Soil
Customer
Number
FSG-65D
FSG-65E
FS6-66D
FSG-66E
FSG-67D
FSG-67E
FSG-750
FSG-75E
FSG-760
FSG-76E
FSG-77D
FSG-77E
FSG-78D
--
FSG-78E
FSG-86D
FSG-86E
FSG-87D
FSG-87E
FSG-88D
*mg L
                                          RE:   FM-2040

                                          Sampled By:    E & E,  Inc.

                                          Delivered By:  Federal Expre  ;
                                  pH.  S.U.

                                    4.97
                                      94
                                      55
                                      14
                                      70
                                      44
                                      66
                                      70
                                    5.15
                                    6.30
                                      21
                                      22
                                    5.35
                                      53
                                      18
                                      89
                                      16
                                    5.13
                                    5.54
                 Solids, %

                    91
                    91
                    86
                    85
                    86
                    82
                    83
                    83
                    88
                    91
                    86
                    82
                    84

                    80
                    89
                    88
                    84
                    85
                    89
Lead, .ng/kg
as received

    12.3
    •C.4
    '"S
    :i'3
     '.00
     '\2
    ..'5
    I' 1
    \ .0
    :.oi2
    I'i.O
    i:,20o
    «,'2
    '•03
    .  ,4
Analytical References;

U.S. EPA Contract Laboratory Program, Inorganic Statement  of  Work,  1

   r»cyrl»<1 paper
Supervising Analyst^-

Oate: 	

  F-86

-------
    ecology and environment, inc.
    InwnwaonM SoKWKn in lh« Envtfonnwm
                          LABORATORY REPORT

                                  FOR

                              Sapp Battery
Job No.:

Sample Date:

Date Received:

Sample Type:

E & E Lab
 Number 86-

Prep Blank*
   0241
   0°42
   0;!42A
   0243
   0244
   0245
   0246
   0247
   0248
   0249
   0250
   0X51
   0252
   0253
   0254
   0255
Prep Blank*
(J-2817

10/31-11/5/85

1/9,13/86

Soil

  Customer
   Number
  FSB-02D
  FSB-02E
  FSB-03D
  FSB-03E
  FSB-04D
  FSB-04E
  FSG-64D
  FSG-64E
  FSG-71D
  FSG-71E
  FSG-85D
  FSG-85E
  FSG-91D
  FSG-91E
  FSG-150
  FSG-15E
          RE:   FM-2040

          Sampled By:    E & E,  Inc.

          Delivered By:  Federal  Expre.:.
  PH.  S.U.
     ,76
     ,48
     ,58
     ,80
     ,93
     ,22
     ,35
     ,95
     ,93
     ,70
     .15
     ,89
     .85
     .99
     .70
    4.69
Solids, %
   82
   81
   87
   90
   89
   90
   90
   78
   95
   97
   86
   84
   82
   86
   78
   76
Lead, -ig/kg
as received

   <0.005

    KK1
    '.:!!
    37.0
    11 9
    1 10
    33.1

    It'. 3
    50.2
    9A.O
    2-1.2

    7*".'? 9
    7.-'-3
    0.006
*mci/L
Analytical References;

U.S. EPA Contract  Laboratory Program,  Inorganic Statement of Work,  19i'4.
Supervising Analyst
                                      \fl<
                                Date:
                                                      '\
    ''•cycled p»(>«f
                                   F-85
                                                                     ? /  /'.'/f
                                                                       or 114
recycled paper
                                                           rruli*Kt mill rimmnmritl

-------
     ecology and environment, inc.
     International Sp*C«**ts m tb« Environment
                          LABORATORY REPORT

                                 FOR

                             Sapp Battery
Job No.:        U-2817

Sample Date:    10/31-11/5/35

Date Received:  1/9,13/86

Sample Type:    Soil
E & E Lab
 Number 86-
Prep Slank*
   0284
   C2J9
   02 JO
   0328

 *mg/L
                      Customer
                       Number
                      FSG-34D
                      FSG-53D
                      FSG-53E
                      FSG-34E
                                         RE:  FM-2040

                                         Sampled By:    E & E, Inc.

                                         Delivered By:  Federal Express
                                         Antimony
Cadmium
                                              mg/kg as received

                                          <0.06               <0.001
Analy.ical References;

U.S. EPA Contract Laboratory Program,  Inorganic Statement  of Work,  191U.
                               Supervising Analyst
                                                          !/?'*)/ ,'-
                               Date:
                                   F-88
                                                                     03l  *

-------
      ecology and environment, inc.
      lnwm«!0n»l ScxCMMU m th« Environnwil
                           LABORATORY REPORT

                                   I-UK

                               Sapp Battery
  Job  No.:

  Sample Date:

  Date Received:

  Sample Type:

  E &  E Lab
  Number 86-

    0275
    0276
    0277
    0278
    i>279
    U280
    0281
    0282
    0283
    0284
    0285
    0286
    0287
    C'288
    0289
    0290
    0291
    0292
    0328
U-2817

10/31-11/5/85

1/9,13/86

Soil

  Customer
   Number

  FSG-88E
  FSG-950
  FSG-95E
  FSG-96D
  FSG-96E
  FSG-97D
  FSG-97E
  FSG-230
  FSG-23E
  FSG-34D
  FSG-51D
  FSG-51E
  FSG-56D
  FSG-56E
  FSG-530
  FSG-53E
  FSG-540
  FSG-54E
  FSG-34E
        RE:  FM-2040

        Sampled By:    E & E, Inc.

        Delivered By:  Federal Express
pH. S.U.
   .16
   .31
   .49
   .19
  6.32
  5.04
   .21
   .40
   .51
   .55
  5.42
  6.21
   .79
   .88
   .40
   .76
   .48
   .29
  5.18
Solids. X

   86
   91
   89
   91
   90
   87
   38
   69
   68
   93
   88
   91
   91
   92
   87
   35
   77
   80
   93
Lead, mg/kg
as re;eived

   5.61
   l"-i
   31.3
   :-,:'
   2:1
   2  i2
   ?V.O
   4. '3
   211
   IV 5
   8.44
 *ng/L
 Analytical References:

 U.S. EPA Contract Laboratory Program,  Inorganic Statement of Work,  I.9J/4.
               Supervising An a 1 ys t
                                    s       j..        .
               Date: _ \^HL^LL, Ml.  /*, '•/
                               "

                                                         LL,
                                   F-87
                                                                      03> . 14
'ecyciad oaper

-------
                    QUALITY CONTROL FOR ACCURACY:  PERCENT RECOVERY
                                    FOR SPIKED SOIL SAMPLES


"lenient
Antimony
Lead





E & E
Laboratory
No. 85-
0328»
0251»
0262*
0277*
0292»
0279*
0328*
Original
Value


<60
48.4*
64.0
15.8
49.8
1.17
46.4
Amount
Added

(ug/L)
500
25
25
25
25
0.5
25
Amount
Determined


469
76.7
87.5
41.0
72.4
1.71
72.4

P'T':ent
S^rovery
JJ.8
1 n
'a.o
101
U.4
V.f
1Q!l
•Results In ug/L because spiking was performed during digestion procedure.
                                              F-90

-------
                                                                            U-2817
                             QUALITY  CONTROL  FOR PRECISION
                           RESULTS  OF ANALYSIS OF REPLICATE
                               ANALYSES OF  SOIL SAMPLES
Analysis
pH




Solids





Lead




Antimony

Cadmium

E & E
Laboratory
No. 85-
0243
0249
0270
0280
0290
0241
0260
0270
0280
OZ50
0292
0249
0260
0268
0279
0328
0279
0328
0279
0328
Original
Analysis
4.22
4.70
6.18
5.04
5.76
82
86
89
87
86
80
16.3
7.00
4.78
234
8.84,
<12
<12
<1
<1
Replicata
Analysis
4.20
4.75
6.23
5.05
5.77
34
86
90
87
87
80
9.98
9.40
4.45
195
4.17
<12
<12
<1
<1
Relative
Percent
Difference
RPO
0.5
1.0
0.8
0.2
0.2
2.4
0
1.1
0
1.2
0
48.1
29.3
7.2
18.2
71.8
«M>
—
•«•
—
                                            F-89
recycled paper

-------
SEDIMENT SAMPLE
ANALYTICAL DATA
      F-92

-------
                                                                         U-Z817
                             QUALITY CONTROL FOR ACCURACY:
                  PERCENT DIFFERENCE—EPA QUALITY ASSURANCE MATERIALS
Element
Antimony
Cadmium
Lead
Concentrations
Known
101
3.30
42.7
42.7
in uq/L
Determined
104
3.45
42.1
42.6
Percent
Difference
3.0
4.5
1.4
0.2
         Note:   These results are within the 955 confidence interval  for  these
                parameters.
                                           F-91
'ecvc'ed caper

-------
    0
ecology and environment, inc.
                             LABORATORY REPORT
                                      FOR
                                   Sapp Battery
  Job Nc.:
          U-2680
  Sample Date:     11/15-26/85
  Date Received:   12/2/85
  Sample Type:     Soil  and Rinsate
RE:   FM-2080
Sampled By:     E & E,  Inc.
Delivered By:   Federal  Expre.^

E & E Lab
Number 85-
8745
8746
8747
8748
8749
8750
8751
-8752
8753
8754
8755
8756
8757
8758*
Prep Blank*

Sample
Identity
FMK-06A
FMK -06B
FMK-06C
FMK -07 A
DMK-07A
FMK-07B
FMK-07C
FMK-08A
FMK-08B
FMK-08C
FMK-09A
FMK -098
FMK-09C
FRS-16
—
Antimony
mg/kg
as received
<12
<12
<12
146
131
<12
<12
216
<12
<12
<12
<12
<12
<0.06
<0.06
Cadmium
mg/kg
as received
<1
t*-r   V,-	/
                                    F-94
                                             /

-------
                              MEMORANDUM
T1:                   Rick Rudy          .

FRO I                  Gary Hahn -4 ^'

DA1E:                 January 4,  1985

SUBJECT:              Sapp Battery  Report;  Job  No.  U-2680

CC:                   Lab File, QA/QC  File
Actached is the laboratory report  of  the  analysis  conducted on
fourteen samples received at the Analytical  Services  Center on
December 2, 1985.  Analysis was performed  according to the procedure-
set forth in U.S. EPA Contract Laboratory Program,  Inorganic Stateme'.'.
of dork, 1984.

All samples, on which this report  is  based,  will  be retained by E&E
f ir a period of 30 days,  from the date of  this  report,  unless other*-'.}
ins'ructed by the client.  If additional  storage  of samples is
rec jested by the client, a storage fee of Sl.OO/sample container pe
airnth will  be charged for each sample, with  such  charges accruing
until destruction of the samples is  authorized by  the client.
GH/cp
enclosure
                                  F-93
     paper

-------
                                                                                         U-2690
                    QUALITY CONTROL FOR ACCURACY:   PERCENT RECOVERY
                                    FOR SPIKED SOIL SAMPLES
Element
Antimony
Cattail*
Lead
E & E
Laboratory
No. 85-
8755R"
8755R*
8755R*
Original
Value

7.0
<1
107
Amount
Added
(ug/L)
500
50
500
Amount
Dete rained

426
51.3
615
Recovery
83,8
103
102
•Results in ug/L.   Spiking performed during the digestion procedure.
                                           F-96

-------
                              QUALITY CONTROL FOR PRECISION
                            RESULTS or ANALYSIS OF REPLICATE
                               ANALYSES OF WAFER AND SOIL
                                                                             U-2680
      Compound
  E 4 E
Laboratory
 No. 85-
Original
Analysis
Replicate
Analysis
                                                                        Relative
                                                                        Percent
                                                                       Difference
                                                                          RPD
      Antimony

      Cadnim

      Lead

      pH

      S Solids
  8755

  8755

  8755

  8746

  8754
  25.1

  4.78

  84
  21.2

  4.87

  83
16.8

1.9

1.2
                                           F-95
'e-:vcied caper

-------
                               MEMORANDUM
TO:                   Rick  Rudy

FROM:                 Gary  Hahn

LYTE:                 January  6,  1986

S'i: JECT:              Sapp  Battery Report,  Job No.  U-2688

CC:                   Lab File, QA/QC  File
Attached is the laboratory  report  of  the  analysis conducted on
nineteen samples received at  the Analytical  Services Center on
Dec-.tnber 3, 1985.  Analysis was performed according to the procedur  .
'ei forth in U.S. EPA  Contract Laboratory Program,  Inorganic Statem^'t
of Work, 1984.

All samples, on which  this  report  is  based,  will  be retained by EiE
for a period of 30 days from  the date of  this  report,  unless otherw e
instructed by the client.   If additional  storage  of samples is
requested by the client, a  storage  fee of Sl.OO/sample container pe
month will be charged  for each sample, with  such  charges accruing
i..itil destruction of the samples is authorized by the  client.
GH/'.p
pnclosure
                                 F-98

-------
                                                                U-2680
                    QUALITY CONTROL FCR ACCURACY:
         PERCENT DIFFERENCE—EPA QUALITY ASSURANCE MATERIALS
                          Concentrations in uq/L

                                                              Percent
Element                  Known          Determined          Difference
Antimony                 101.5            122.2                 20.J

lead                     42.7             40.9                  A.2
Notei  These results are within the 955 confidence interval  for  these
       parameters.
                                F-97
                                                                     nml rMMrnmut nt

-------
                                                                        U-2688
                        QUALITY CONTROL FOR  PRECISION
                      RESULTS OF ANALYSIS OF REPLICATE
                          ANALYSES OF SOIL SAMPLES
                                                                   Relative
                  E 4 E                                            Percent
                Laboratory       Original        Replicate       Difference
Compound         No. 85-         Analysis        Analysis            RPD


Antimony          8798            <12              <12
                  8801            <12              <12

Cadmium           8798            <1               <1
                  8801            <1               <1

Lead              8801            238              394               49.4

pH                8796            4.30             4.30              0

Solids            8791            67               71                5.8
                  8802            83               83                0
                                   F-100

-------
              ecology and environment, inc.
              Innminon*! SMettMtl in IIH f nwonm«nl
Job No.:        U-2688

Sample Date:    11/26,27/85

Date Received:  12/3/85

Sample Type:    Soil and Water
                    LABORATORY REPORT

                           FOR

                      Sapp Battery

                          RE:  FM-2080

                          Sampled By:    E & E, Inc.

                          Delivered By:  Federal Express
E & E Lab
 Number 85-
Prep Blank*
  217
   8787
   8788
   8789
   8790
   8791
   8792
   8793
   8794
   8795
   3796
   8797
   8798
   8799
   8800
   3801
   8802
   8803
   8804*
   8805*
Customer
 Number
FMK-01A
FMK-01B
FMK-01C
FMK-02A
FMK-02B
FMK-02C
FMK-03A
FMK-038
OMK-03B
FMK-03C
FMK-04A
FMK-04B
FMK-04C
DMK-04C
FMK-05A
FMK-05B
FMK.-05C
FSR-17
FSR-18
pH, S.U.    Antimony    Cadmium     Lead    % Solk?

                  mg/kg as received

              <0.06      <0.005    <0.005
 7.05
   00
   35
   10
   50
   45
   30
   35
   55
   30
   50
   05
 4.25
   30
   05
   05
 4.00
  NR
36.2
77.4
27.5
69.7
1.15
1.51
<0.06
<0.005-
<0.005
          10,900
          12,500
          7.80
          139
          1280
          12.3
          115
          81.6
          65.7
          60.2
          1270
          115
          2.51
          3.78
          238
          5.28
          3.84
          0.036
70
63
83
80
67
88
72
76
77
79
64
79
34
83
77
83
82
m-
NR
 *mg/L

 NR-Ana lysis Not Requested

Analytical References:

U.S. EPA Contract Laboratory Program,  Inorganic  Statement of Work, 1984.
                                Supervising Analyst -

                                Date:
                           >/-*• <*   '"^ L»

                          j F-99       \
                                                                               C1dlt4
                                                                     nlii£% mul rmirmiMM iti

-------
     P 0  Box 20382/160 Upton Or/JacKson. Ms 39209/601-922-8242/800-523-0659
         7215 Pine Forest Rd./Pensacola. Fl. 32506/904-944-0301/800-874-0272
January 9,  1986
File No. 3.86J.02b
//U
                                                               /Y '•>
         A' / '.
Hr. Andy C1 ifton
Ecology and Environment,  Inc.
196 Sugg Road
Buffalo, NY 14225

OP;V Mr. Cl ifton:

Subject:  EPS Project  No.  3.85.1588.01
          EPS Laboratory  Report  No.  3.85.1098 and

Enclosed are the corrected and  conpleted analytical results for the SL 1
samples submitted  to our  Pensacola laboratory on November 15 and 19,   '

..Please disregard all previous  reports.   We extend our apology for the
errors in the previous reports,  and  hope that this has not caused an;,
inconvenience.

We appreciate your business  and  hope you will keep us in mind for any
future analytical  needs.   Should you have any questions regarding thi*
report or require  further  information or assistance, please call me a
904-944-0301.

Sincerely,

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  SYSTEMS, IMC.
Manager  of Analytical  Services

OK/ch

Enclosures


cc:  Ms.  Kim Burton

-------
                                                                U-Z68B
                    QUALITY  CONTROL  FOR  ACCURACY:
         PERCENT OIFFERENCE—EPA  QUALITY ASSURANCE MATERIALS
                          Concentrations  in  uq/V.

                                                               Percent
Element                  Knonn          Determined          Difference


Antimony                 101.5              104.1                2.6

Cachiiun                  39.0               46.5                 19.2

Lead                     42.7               42.0                 1.6
                         435                489                  12.4
                                 F-101
                                                                  lug* unir..nni. in

-------
           ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION SYSTEMS, INC.
          • O So. 103tl • 1«0 Uoton Onv« • jKkton, MS 39209
                   T«i«onoit 1601) 922 82*2
     721S P.m Farm ROM .POUCOII ?•. 3230S
          Ttiwnor* I9O41 9*4 0301
                                 LABORATORY REPORT
                                                                       111-.-
    CLIENT   Ecology and Environment,  Inc.
  LOCATION   Buffalo, NY
     DATE   01/08/86
INVO.CENO   6705/ch
1098-05  - OSA120
1098-06  - FSA12E
1098-07  - FSA13A
1098-08  - FSA138
  COLLECTED BY  Client
DATE COLLECTED  11/14-18/85
 GATE RECEIVED  11/15419/85
DATE ANALYZED  H/16 -  12/P/'85
                           LABORATORY SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION-
1 ., /. ANALYSES


Percent Sol ids
pH
Lead, mg/kg (WL-220.353)
Lead, mg/';g (WL-405.783)
Cadmium, mg/kg (WL»226.502)
Cadmium, mg/kg (WL-228.802)
Antimony, mg/kg


•••*!••••••••••
r 1098-05


78.2
3.45
68.4
—
<1.8*
<.50
<.20


COMMENT
1098-06


84.1
3.44
60.3
—
<1.6*
<.58
<.23



1098-07


90.9
1.86
98.6
—
<.56
<.56
0.22


?
1098-08 ^


83.1
3.30
>2,249
4,735
<2.9*
0.67
13.9


IliJI^HHIH
Analyses  conducted in accordance with EPA 600/4-79-020, Methods for Chemicai  Analysis
of Water  and  Wastes. March 1979.

Analyses  performed in compliance with procedures  specified for the Contract . iboratory
Program.
    MA IAGCR. CHEMICAL LABORATORY
                                                              . ANALYTICAL SF VICES
                                      F-104

-------
           ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION SYSTEMS,  iUC,
            ° ta' 2M8M '"_uJ"'r' °"'VJ!*,"10" MS 392«         "'» '•« '«'« •— • '-««•'.. '• »5oe
                    Union* 16011932824}
                                                          T«l«onon. 1904) 944<03C,1
 INVOICE NO
                                 LABORATORY REPORT
    CLIENT   Ecology  and Environment, Inc.
  LOCATION   Buffalo,  NY
     OATE   01/08/86
            6705/ch
1098-01 - FSA12A
1098-02 - FSA12B
1098-03 - FSA12C
1098-04 - FSA120
  COLLECTED BY-  Cllent  (158b)
OATECOLLECTEO  11/14-18/85
 OATE RECEIVED  11/15419/85
DATE ANALYZED  11/16 . 12/0',85
                           LABORATORY SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION-
                                                                                L/1Q
                                                   • IDENTIFICATION NUMBER

Percent Sol ids
PH
Lead, mg/kg (Wl-220.353)
Lead, mg/k} (WL "405. 783)
Cadmium, mg/kg (WL»226.502)
Cadmium, mg/kg (WL»228.802)
Antimony , mg/kg


	 tm 	
••••••••••••••

82.0 _j
7.28
>2,043
2716
<3.1*
<.60
6.25



COMMENT
1 V70-VC
85.2
6.04
426
402
»
67.4 . 71.8
3.46| 3.43
661 | 64.2
691
<1.4*( <1.6*
<.87J <.57
15.4 0.21


|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^•E MTV^^I^^^^^^^^^^H
Analyses conducted  1n accordance with EPA 600/4-79-020, Methods for Chemica   dialysis
of Water and Wastes. March 1979.

Analyses performed  1n compliance with procedures  specified  for the Contract laboratory
Program.

*0ata not used  due  to background interference ( AL >  SOppm).
                                    CERTIFICATION
    MANAG^N,
                                                       WRECTOR,ANALYTICAL S£r  >mm in

-------
           ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION SYSTEMS, t:MC.
           O to. 2O312 • 160 Upton Onv* • jK»on MS 39209
                   T.i«ono«. 1601)92713*2
     72tS P,n« Cornt RoaO •'•HHCOK * L 3SSO«
          T.i«jnon« l»0*l 9** 0301
                                 LABORATORY REPORT
                               ia/in
    CLIENT    Ecology and Environment, Inc.
  LOCATION    Buffalo, NY
     DATE    01/08/86
.NVO.CE NO..   6705/ch
1098-13 - OSA13E
1098-14 - FSR10
1098-15 - FMT13A
1098-16 - FMT138
  COLLECTED BY  Client
DATE COLLECTED  11/14-18/85
 OMTERECEIVED  11/15419/85
DATE ANALYZED  H/16 - 12/04/85
                           LABORATORY SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
                                                    IDENTIFICATION I
                                                     1098-14  |    1098-15  \   1098-16
Percent Solids
PH
Lead, mg/kg (WL-220.353)
Lead, mg/kg (WL«4p5.783)
Cadmium, mg/kg (WL-226.502)
Cadmium, mg/kg (Wl*228.802)
Antimony, mg/kg



mmm!Kf^mfmiiimmmm
77.9
3.33
151
150
<2.1*
0.92
0.46



COMMENT
Liquid
1.31
<.05
--
<.00£
<.OOS
<.002




64.3
5.58
20.1
_
, j A^|
<.35





85.9
4.30
26.3
—
<.62*
<.44
<.18



F/JHHH1
Analyses conducted 1n accordance  with EPA 600/4-79-020, Methods for Chemical  Analysis
of Water and Hastes.  March  1979.

Analyses performed in compliance  with procedures specified for the Contract  i.noratory
Program.

*0ata not used due to background  Interference (AL > SOppm).
                                    CERTIFICATION
    MANAGER. CHEMICAL LABOH/TOHY
                    2¥~
               . ANALYTICAC Ser /IC6S
                                       F-106

-------
           ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION SYSTEMS, INC.
          f O Sot 203U • 160 Uotan Onv< • JlcKion. MS 39209
                   T.nonoo. (601) 9228342
     7219P.fi* Pornt Bow • FtnMCOIl. - ,. 323O6
          T.l«onon« 19041 944 0301
                                 LABORATORY REPORT-
    CLIENT   Ecology  and  Environment,  Inc.
  LOCATION.   Buffalo,  NY
     OATE   01/08/86
INVOICE NO.   6705/ch
                                !3/lQ
1098-09 - OSA138
1098-10 - FSA13C
1098-11 - FSA130
1098-12 - FSA13E
  COLLECTEOBY  Client (1588)
DATE COLLECTED  11/14-18/85
 DATE RECEIVED  H/15419/85
 DATE ANALYZED  11/16 . 12/PT'85
                           LABORATORY SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
^^^^^^•M^^^v-vTmTT^^^^^^^^^^^^H
Percent Sol ids
PH
Lead, mg/kg (WL«220.353)
Lead, mg/kg (WL*405.783)
Cadmium, r.,g/kg (Wl»226.502)
Cadmium, mg/kg (WL-228.802)
Antimony, mg/kg


..
m^mi^m^mmmmmmm
1098-09
34.8
3.23
>2,194
8,842
<.77«
0.78
13.6



COMMENT
1098-10
79.0
3.10
>2,482
6,317
<4.0*
<.50
20.1




1098-11
52.3
3.12
217
200
5.52
4.32
0.56



.
1098-12
80.5
3.29
254
210
<1.9*
1.27
0.64



'iJL^^^^^I
Analyses conducted 1n accordance with EPA 600/4-79-020, Methods for Chemical Analysis
of Water and Wastes. March 1979.

Analyses performed 1n compliance with procedures specified for the Contract l.-.boratory
Program.

*0ata not used due to background interference ( AL > BOppm).
                                     CERTIFICATION
     MANAGER. CHtMICAL LAiOB/TORY
  fr *  rflRECTO«! AIWUVTICAt SI':', ICCS
                                        F-105
     recycled paper
                                                                     ami rii\inHtntrlil

-------
          ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION SYSTEMS, IMC.
          ' O 8o« 233(2 • t«0 ugion Onv. . jM«ion MS 392O9
                  Tiimnon* 16011 923 §242
                                                    721S ».»»• Furor lloM • r>nucoi> f . 32SO6
                                                         T«i«or,on« I9O4I 94« 0301
                                 LABORATORY REPORT
                                                                   .inqp
   CLIENT   Ecology and  Environment, Inc.
 LOCATION   Buffalo, NY
    OATE   01/08/86
.NVOICENO   6705/cn
1098-21  - DMT11B
1098-22  - FMT10A
1098-23  - FMT10B
1098-24  - FMT09A
                                                 COLLECTED 8V  C1 1 6flt ( 1 588 )
                                               DATE COLLECTED  ll/H-18/85
                                                 OATEBECEIVEO  U/15S19/85
                                                DATE ANALYZED  U/lfi . 12/04/85
                          LABORATORY SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
Percent Sol ids
PH
Lead, mg/kg (WL-220.353)
Lead, mg/kg (WL»405.783)
Cadmium, mg/kg (WL«226.502)
Cadmium, ,ng/kg (WL»228.802)
Antimony, mg/kg




81.9
4.78
5.4
..
<.43
<.43
<.17



COMMENT
27.9
4.15
212
191
<1.56«
1.21
0.87




71.9
3.54
28.9
..
<.47
<.47
<.19



f
23.1
4.38
99.7
..
<1.53*
<1.10
<.44



I^J^H^HI
                                                                NUMBER I
                                                                1098-23
                                                                           1098-24
Analyses  conducted 1n accordance with  EPA 600/4-79-020, Methods for Cnemlcs   Analysis
of Mater  and  Wastes. March 1979.

Analyses  performed in compliance with  procedures  specified for the Contract Laboratory
Program.

*Data not used due to background interference (AL > SOppm).
                                   CERTIFICATION.
    MANAGER. CHEMICAL LABORATORY
                                                             , ANAtYTICALSt •' /ICES
                                      F-108

-------
           ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  SYSTEMS, IMC.
          ' °- ™M^: T.^.a—MS '-         *	•               -3JS08
                               LABORATORY REPORT-
    CLIENT   Ecology  and Environment, Inc.
  LOCATION   Buffalo, NY

     OATE   01/08/86
 INVOICE NO   6705/cn
 1098-17 - FMT12A
 1098-18 - FMT12B
 1098-19 - FMT11A
 1098-20 - FMT118
  COLLECTED BY  Client  (1588^

DATE COLLECTED-  11/14-18/85

 OAT6 RECEIVED  11/15*19/85

OATE ANALYZED  U/16 - 12/0'l/35
                         LABORATORY SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION-
	 **- .^^••••^••••incMTictrATinu •IIHUBCEI^MHI
1 . ANAI V<;P<; • ^^BV!W!M^I
Percent Solids
pH
Lead, mg/kg (WL-220.353)
Lead, mq/kg (WL-405.783)
Cadmium, mg/kg (WL»226.502)
Cadmium, mq/kq (WL-228.802)
Antimony, mg/kg



IU70-1 /
73.4
4.15
10.1
_.
<.63
<.63
<.25



1 nOfl 1 SJ ^ nno i n
1U5O-18
77.7
3.70
57.0
— —
<1.05*
<.66
<.16


if- __
IU7O-15
66.8
5.48
34.0
_ ^
<.80<
<.31
0.36











1 , K COMMENT . '-^
                                                                          81.2
                                                                           4.71
                                                                          10.7
                                                                           <.40
                                                                           0.16
Analyses conducted 1n accordance with EPA 600/4-79-020, Methods  for Chemica;  '.nalysis
of Water and Wastes. March 1979.

Analyses performed 1n compliance with procedures specified for the Contract Laboratory
Program.

*0ata  not used due to background interference ( AL > SOpprn).
                                 CERTtFICATION
    MANAGtR, CHEMICAL L^IOMATORV
                                    F-107
       6l»ieCTO»k. ANALVTICAL W. ICES
    recycled paper
                                                                  rn\iriinntriil

-------
           ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION SYSTEMS, INC.
          f O SOB 2031] • 160 Union Driv. . JKkion. MS 392O9
                   T«l«ono«« <«01> 922-»2«2
     7215 Pm« Forvtt Road • *»nwcoit, ' L 32506
          T*l«onon( (9041 944 030"
                                 LABORATORY REPORT
                                                                   as.ingp
    CLIENT    Ecology  and Environment, Inc.
  LOCATION.   Buffalo, NY
     DATE    01/08/86
.NVO.CENO..
1098-29 - DMT08A
1098-30 - FMT08B
1098-31 - FMH15A
1098-32 - OMH15A
  COLLECTED BY  Client ( 15£f,'
DATE COLLECTED  11/14-18/85
 DATE RECEIVED  H/15419/85
DATE ANALYZED  \\/\S - 12/0<- /85
                           LABORATORY SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
   • IDENTIFICATION NUMBERI
     1098-30  |    1098-31
                                                                             1098-32
Percent Sol ids
pH
Lead, mg/kg (WI-220.353)
Lead, mg/kg (WL-405.783)
Cadmium, mg/kg (WL-226.502)
Cadmium, mg/kg (Wl«228.802)
Antimony, mg/kg



1 V
60.0
4.12
34.3
m —
<.56*
<.31
<.12



COMMENT
76.2
4.02
33.2
..
<.69*
<.29
<.ll



••••
15.5
4.20
137.6
._
<2.04
<2.04
2.04



••••
14.2
4.21
183.8
.-
<2.62
<2.62
4.19




Analyses conducted 1n accordance with  EPA 600/4-79-020, Methods for Chemical Analysis
of Water and Wastes. March 1979.

Analyses performed in compliance with  procedures  specified  for the Contract laboratory
Program.

*0ata not used due to background Interference (AL >  SOppm).
                                    CERTIFICATION
    MANAGER. CHEMICAL LABORATORY
               , ANALYTICAL SE 'VICES
                                       F-110

-------
           ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION SYSTEMS, INC.
          CO to* 203*1 •  ISO uoion D"v« . Jicktofl MS 39209          7S1S Pin. Ftjrnt ROM . PtnueoK. PL 32S06
                   T.i«onen«. 16011 922 »242                        Ttl«cnon«. (9041 944-0301
                                 LABORATORY REPORT
                                                                                 '7/10
    CLIENT   Ecology and Environment,  Inc.
  LOCATION-   Buffalo, NY
     DATE   01/08/86
INVO.CENO..
1098-25 - FMT09B
1098-26 - FMT07A
1098-27 - FMT078
1098-28 - FMT08A
  COLLECTED BY  C11 ent (
OAT6 COLLECTED  H/14-18/85
 DATE RECEIVED-  H/15&19/85
DATE ANALYZED  11/16 .  12/04,,15
                           LABORATORY SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION

ANALYSES

Percent Solids
PH
Lead, mg/kg (WL-220.353)
Lead, mg/kg (WL«405.783)
Cadmium, mg/kg (WL«226.502)
Cadmium, mg/kg (WL-228.802)
Antimony, mg/kg



1
^mmmmmmmmmmmm
i noo oc

73.6
4.20
62.0
__
<1.19«
<.54
<.22



COMMENT
• IDENTIFICAT
1 (1QH 7f\

14.3
3.90
269
..
<2.72
<2.72
8.71




ON IMIIMRFRH
1 r»QR-?7

14.3
3.49
<26.1
—
<2.61
<2.61
1.04




•tfVI^^^HB^^
. nna jt>

60.1
4.04
22.7
--
<.49
<.49
<.20



EI9HH1
Analyses conducted 1n accordance with EPA 600/4-79-020, Methods for Chemical Malysis
of Mater and Wastes. March 1979.

Analyses performed In compliance with procedures specified for the Contract I \horatory
Program.

*0ata not 'jsed due to background interference (AL > SOppm).
                                     CERTIFICATION
    MANAGE*. CHEMICAL LAIOMATOMV
                                                         DIMCTOW, ANAl YTICAL SIR VICES
                                        F-109
     recycled paper
                                                                     unit rn«irni

-------
          ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION SYSTEMS, XNC.
           O fo» 2O3*2 • ICO ueton Or.v« • J*c»on MS 39209
                   Tdwnon*  16011 922 82*2
     7215 P>«> form Row) • »«n««col«. ' L 32506
          T.l«onon. 19041 944 03C
                                 LABORATORY REPORT
            Ecology and Environment, Inc.
  LOCATION    Buffalo, NY
     OATE    01/08/86
.NVO.CENO    6705/cn
                               in/in
1098-37 -  FMH13B
1098-38   FMH12A
1098-39 -  FMH12B
1098-40 -  FSR11
  COLLECTED BY  Cl 1eflt ( 1 £*•»»)
DATE COLLECTED  ll/14-18/8b
 OATE RECEIVED  11/15419/8!
OATEANALYZED  ii/ie - 12/C4/85
                           LABORATORY SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
Percent Sol ids
pH
Lead, i..i,/kg (WL-220.353)
Lead, mg/kg (WL-405.783)
Cadmium, mg/kg (WL-226.502)
'Cadmium, mq/kq (WL-228.802)
Antimony , mg/kg




15.3
3.18
82.4
..
<3.22
<3.22
3.86



COMMENT
23.2
3.60
366
250
<1.76
<1.76
5.98




37.5 ' Liquid
3.73 1.29
108 | <.05
-- !
<1.96' <.005
<.89 <.005
0.71 t 0.004
1
i
1
i
H^^^^^R^H^HHIH
Analyses conducted 1n accordance with EPA 600/4-79-020, Methods for Chemic?'  Analysis
of Water and Wastes.  March  1979.

Analyses performed in compliance with procedures specified for the Contract  .aboratory
Program.

•Data not used due to background  interference (AL > 50ppm).
                                    CERTIFICATION
    MANAGER, CHEMICAL LABORATORY
                                                        OirdiTOR.-ikM^YTICAL ST!• VICES
                                      F-112

-------
           ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  SYSTEMS, IMC.
          f O «o. 20313 •  160 ueion Dr.v. . j.c»,on MS 39209
                   T»l«o«on« (601) 927 83*3
                                              « farnt *o*a ' P»n,»eoU. *u J2SO8
                                              T.l«ohon«. 190*1 944.0301
    CLIENT
  LOCATION-
     DATE
INVOICE NO
                                 LABORATORY REPORT
Ecology and Environment,  Inc.
Buffalo,  NY
01/08/86
6705/ch
                                                                                ;q/in
1098-33 - FMH15B
1098-34 - :-MH14A
1098-35 - FMH14B
1098-36 - FMH13A
  COLLECTEDav  Cl 1 60t ( 1 580 I
DATE COLLECTED  11/14-18/85
 DATE RECEIVED.  H/15J19/85
DATE ANALYZED  U/16 . 12/04/85
                           LABORATORY SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION-
^^^^^^^^^^^•^^^^VTTFI & i, i i ^^^^•^^^^mmm^pv . «%nM -. .*
Percent Solids
OH
Lead, mg/kg (WL-220.353)
Lead, mg/kg (WL»405.783)
Cadmium, mg/kg (Wl-226.502)
Cadmium, mg/kg (WL»228.802)
Antimony. Mg/kg



1U-JO- JJ
16.1
4.02
32.2
..
<2.51
<2.51
1. 01




1U7O- J4
13.3
3.59
692
820
<2.74
<2.74
42.3




iuyo- JD
18.4
3.26
72.8
100
<2.49
2.99
2.99


,_
iu~»o- jo
15.6
3.43
410
510
4.05
5.07
16.2



| COMMENT . Ht
Analyses Conducted  1n  accordance with  EPA 600/4-79-020, Methods for Chemica; 'nalysis
of Mater and Wastes. March  1979.

Analyses performed  1n  compliance with  procedures  specified for the Contract i iboratory
Program.

*0ata not used due  to  background interference (AL > SOppm).
                                    CERTIFICATION
    MANAGER, CHEMICAL LAjOftATOMY~
                                        F-lll
                                                   . ANALYTICAL SEK '>CES
    recvciea

-------
          ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  SYSTEMS, IMC.
          f O fe» 2O313 • HO Ueton Or.v« • J«c«ion MS 393O9
                   T««ohoew (SOU 932 iJ«5
    7215 'in. Form Moid • *tnMCOi> PL "2504
          T«t«onon« 19041 944-0301
                                 LABORATORY REPORT
                   ;-i i i
                               '?nn
    CUIENT   Ecology and Environment,  Inc.
  LOCATION   Buffalo, NY
     OATE   01/08/86
INVOICE NO.   6705/ch
1114-05  -  FMT05A
1114-06  -  FMT05B
1114-07  -  FMT04A
1114-08  -  FMT04B
  COLLECTEDav  Client (1588'
DATE COLLECTED  H/14-18/85
 OATEBECEIVED  H/15419/85
DATE ANALYZED  U/16 . 12/04/35
                           LABORATORY SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
                                                   • IDENTIFICATION NUMBERI
                                                     1114-06  I   1114-07  !   1114-08
Percent Sol ids
PH
Lead, mg/kg (WL-220.353)
Lead, mg/kg (WL»405.783)
Cadmium, mg/kg (WL-226.502)
Cadmium, mg/kg (WL-228.802)
Antimony, mg/kg




63.7
4.22
587
520
<2.54*
<.55
0.55



COMMENT
78.6
3.85
25.2
—
<1.22*
<.47
<.19




60.2
4.21
324
250
<.74*
<.53
<.21




77.9
3.95
69.7
70
<.50
<.50
<.20




 Analyses conducted 1n accordance with EPA 600/4-79-020, Methods  for  Chemical  ',ialys1s
 of Water and Wastes.  March  1979.

 Analyses performed 1n compliance with procedures specified for the Contract I. Moratory
 Program.

 *0ata not used due to background  interference (AL > SOppm).
                                    CERTIFICATION
     MANAGER. CHEMICAL LA8OHTOMV
                                                               . ANALYTICAL SERVICES
                                        F-114

-------
           ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  SYSTEMS, INC.
' O 8oa 2O392 • f<0 UDton Onv« • jacftton MS 39209
         T.lwnon.. I«01I 922 «2«2
                                                     7215 P.n* Fornt «o.d • P*nucol«. « . 32906
                                                           T«l«CHOn« 19041 944 0301
                                 LABORATORY REPORT
                                                                   35-1 1 1 A
    CLIENT   Ecology and Environment, Inc.
  LOCATION   Buffalo, NY
     OATE   01/08/86
        D   6705/ch
1114-01 - FSR12
1114-02 - FSR13
1114-03 - FSR14
1114-04 - FSR15
  COLLECTED8Y
DATE COLLECTED
 DATE RECEIVED
OATE ANALYZED
                                                    Client (1583)
                                                    11/14-18/85
                                                    H/15419/85
                                                    n/lfi .
                           LABORATORY SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
                                                                                ! i y i n
                                                   IIOENTIFICATION NUMBERI
Percent Solids
PH
Lead, wi/' 50ppm).
                                    CERTIFICATION
    MANAOCR. CHEMICAL LA80R4TOMV
                                       F-U3
                                                    . A^A^YTICAL Sf RVlCH
     recycieo paper

-------
           ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION SYSTEMS,  IIUC.
          f O lo« 10313 • '«O UB'an Oriv* • Jjclion MS 39209
                   T««enon* 160119228242
              7215 f  SOppm).
                                    CERTIFICATION
    MANAGER. CHEMICAL LABORATORY
w
F-116
                                                              . ANALYTICAL SI'I VICES

-------
           ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION SYSTEMS, INC.
            O BOK 2O382 • ISO Uotgn Qriv* • JKMQn MS 39209
                   T«l«jnon« 1801) 927 8242
     7215 Pm. form Hota • Pmucan. ft 32S06
          T«l«on0n« 19041 944-0301
                                  LABORATORY REPORr
                                                                     -111A
    CLIENT   Ecology and Environment,  Inc.
  LOCATION   Buffalo, NY
     OATE   01/08/86
 INVOKE NO-   67Q5/ h
                               LI/I n
1114-09 - FMT03A
1114-10 - FMT03B
1114-11 - FMH09A
1114-12 - rMH098
  COLLECTED BY  Client (1588)
DATE COLLECTED  H/14-18/85
 DATE RECEIVED  H/15&19/85
DATE ANALYZED.  U/lfi . 12/(M'35
                           LABORATORY SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
                                                    • IDENTIFICATION NUMBERI

Percent Sol ids
PH
Lead, mg/kg (WL-220.353)
Lead, mg'kg (WL«405.783)
Cadmium, mg/kg (WL-226.502)
Cadmium, mg/kg (WL-228.802)
Antimony, mg/kg



1
1 1 iW?
59.3
4.69
593
560
<.76*
0.66
0.66



COMMENT

80.2
3.97
57.5
60
<.61
<.61
<.24





67.6
3.44
136
100
<.54
<.54
0.76





82.6
3.52
31.2
_ —
<.38
<.38
<.15




Analyses conducted In accordance  with  EPA 600/4-79-020,  Methods  for  Chemical  Analysis
of Water and Wastes.  March 1979.

Analyses performed 1n compliance  with  procedures specified  for  the Contract  Moratory
Program.

*0ata not used due to background  Interference (AL >  50ppm).
                                    CERTIFICATION
    MANAGER. CHEMICAL LAMMATOflY
                                        F-115
                                                                 AM^LVTICAL SIM < ICES
     recycled paper
                                                                     Hn«l

-------
           ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION SYSTEMS, K'fC.
          • O loi 1O3»2 • 140 Uoion Onv« • JKKion MS 39209
                   T.l«oh0n« (6011
                                                    7215 *m» *or«t Road • F.nt«col« c  12SO6
                                                         T«i«onon. |90«l 944-030
                                 LABORATORY REPORT
                                                                 35-11.1.4
                                                                               .fi/in
   CLIENT   Ecology and  Environment, Inc.
 LOCATION   Buffalo,  NY
     OATE   01/08/86
•NVOICENO   6705/cn
                                                  COLLECTED BY  C11 6tlt ( 1 588 .
                                                OATE COLLECTED  H/14-18/85
                                                 OATE RECEIVED  H/15419/85
                                                 OATE ANALYZED.  U/16 - 12/04,85
                           LABORATORY SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
1114-21  -  FMH03A
1114-22  -  FMH038
1114-23  -  FMH04A
1114-24  -  FMH04B
                                                   IDENTIFICATION NUMBERI
                                                    1114-22     1114-23
Percent Sol ids
pH
Lead, mg/kg (WL-220.353)
Lead, mo/t-g (WL -405. 783)
Cadmium, mg/kg (WL-226.502)
Cadmium, mg/kg (WL -228. 802)
Antimony, mg/kg



64.8
3.72
46.7
...
<.62
<.62
3.00



81.6
3.38
6.3
„_
<.45
<.45
<.18



75.4
3.44
16.7
.-
0.49
0.49
<.20



79.6
3.40
19.7
--
<.52*
<.43
<.17



                                                                            1114-24
                                      COMMENT
Analyses conducted  in  accordance with EPA 600/4-79-020,  Methods  for Chemical Analysis
of Wate" and Wastes. March 1979.

Analyses t-erformed  in  compliance with procedures specified  for the Contract laboratory
Program.

*0ata not used due  to  background interference (AL > SOppm).
                                    CERTIFICATION
     MANAG «. CHEMICAL LABOMATBRV
                                                                  '
                                                       DIRECTOR, ANALYTICAL S*'>  CES
                                       F-118

-------
           ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  SYSTEMS,  IMC.
            O Ban 20382 • 160 Uoton Onv« • JKKIOH MS 39209
                    T SOppm).
                                     CERTIFICATION
     MANAG/N,
                                         F-117
       JiMCCTOT. ANALYTICAL SCR CSS
      recycled paper
                                                                ci II|«IE\ 1*114! rmirtiniftfcii

-------
           ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION SYSTEMS, INC.
          ' O to> 20362 • 160 Uaton Oriv* • JKHian MS 39209
                   TKaonon* (60119236242
     7215 »cn« Farm Raid • »«m«col« H. J2SO6
          Tn«non« 19041 944 030 i
                                 LABORATORY REPORT
                                                                  85-1 114
    CLIENT   Ecology and Environment, Inc.
  LOCATION   Buffalo, NY
     OATE   01/08/86
 INVOKE NO.   6705/ch
1114-29 -  FMH07A
1114-30 -  FMH07B
1114-31 -  OMH07B
1114-32 -  FMH08A
  COLLECTEDBY  Client  (1588!
DATE COLLECTED  H/14-18/85
 OATE RECEIVED  H/15419/85
OATE ANALYZED-  U/16 .  12/QA/85
                           LABORATORY SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
                               Ifl/lQ
                                                   • IDENTIFICATION NUMBERBB
                                                             I   1114-31  i   1114-32
Percent Solids
PH
Lead, mg/kg (WL-220.353)
Lead, mg/kg ( WL -405.783)
Cadmium, mg/kg (WL«226.502)
Cadmium, mg/kg (WL-228.802)
Antimony, mg/kg


^ 	 . 	
^•n^HHH^HIH^Hi
48.5
3.49
109
_ _
1.20
1.35
10.5



COMMENT
66.2
3.47
39.3
_ —
<1.12*
0.7
<.22




69.8
3.50
31.4
• «•
<.91*
0.81
<.20




52.6
3.48
61.0
__
<1.64*
0.70
1.29



wi^^^m
Analyses  conducted 1n accordance with EPA 600/4-79-020, Methods for Chemical  Analysis
of Water  and  Wastes. March 1979.

Analyses  performed in compliance with procedures  specified for the Contract laboratory
Program.

•Data not used due to background Interference (AL >  SOppm).
                                    CERTIFICATION
    MANAGER. CHCMICAL LABORATORY
                                                       DIRECTOR. ANALYTICAL SERVICES

-------
           ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  SYSTEMS, IMC.
          f O •»• 2O38J . 180 Uocon Onv. . jKKton. MS 39209
                   T.l«,hon. 18011 922 8742
     7219 »in. Fornt «o«d • P.nucolt. f . 32SO8
          T.l»noo« 19041 944-0301
                                 LABORATORY REPORT
    CLIENT   Ecology and Environment,  Inc.
  LOCATION   Buffai0t NY
     DATE   01/08/86
 INVOKE NO
1114-25 -  FMH05A
1114-26 -  FMH05B
1114-27 -  FMH06A
1114-28 -  FMH06B
  COLLECTEDBY  Client (158B1
DATE COLLECTED  11/14-18/85
 DATE RECEIVED.  H/15419/85
DATE ANALYZED'  \\/\6 .  12/0-1/85
                           LABORATORY SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
                                                                               17/1 n
.7 ANALYSES

Percent Sol ids
PH
Lead, mg/kg (WL-220.353)
Lead, mi/ kg (WL*405.783)
Cadmium, ng/kg (WL-226.502)
Cadmium, mg/kg (WL»228.802)
Antimony, mg/kg



1
1 1 1 A 2C

50.4
3.38
103
..
<.75
<.75
10.7



COMMENT
1111 9*

72.9
3.44
19.8
..
0.88
<.55
0.22




i i i A 97

14.9
3.71
251
--
3.21
3.74
47.1




1114 ?fl

19.1
2.79
  SOppra).
                                    CERTIFICATION
    MANAGE*. CHEMICAL LABORATORY
                                       F-119
                                                    4/^t^  s-i*-^?^^
                                                        DIRECTOR. «N«LYTICALSTM vict s
    recycled paper
                                                             ffulof\ ttnti

-------
           ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION SYSTEMS,  If 1C.
           O §OM ]O3t3 • 180 Do ton Onv. . Jickion. MS 392O9
                   Tw«ol»on« ISO!) 932 «34J
     7215 Pm« farm «o«a • PtnucoK F..32SO6
          T«i SOppm).
                                    CERTIFICATION
            CHEMICAL LAtONATOMV
                                                  ./(&
          ^(^
          EC70R. ANALYTICAL SER\ II
                                                       DUUC^OR. ANALYTICAL SER\ ICES
                                       F-122

-------
           ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION SYSTEMS, IMC.
            O Bo* 20383 • 160 Upton Oriv* • Jacxion MS 39209
                    T«l«onon« 18011 93J 8242
7219 fmt Farm ROM • Piniaeoll. ' L 32906
     T««onon« I9O4) 944.0301
1 • LABORATORY REPORT
CLIENT
LOCATION
DATE:
INVOICE NO :
™^^-^^— ^—
Ecology and
Buffalo, NY
01/08/86
6705/ch
Environment, Inc.
COLLECTED 8X
DATE COLLECTED
DATE RECEIVED.
DATE ANALYZED-
I " ., LABORATORY SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
Hi is 11 ' Tin 1
Client (1588^
11/14-18/85
11/15*19/85
11/16 - 12/0*785
••MBfcil-HHHH
1114-33 - FMH088
1114-34 - OMH08B
1114-35 - FMT01A
1114-36 - FMT01B

Percent Solids
PH
Lead, mg/kg (WL-220.353)
Lead, mg/kg (WL»405.783)
Cadmium, mg/kg (WL-226.502)
Cadmium, mg/kg (WL-228.802)
Antimony, mg/kg



in^-jj
71.0
3.46
53.6
._
<.86*
<.54
<.21



i 1 1H- J>»
72.5
3.33
32.8
_.
<.74*
<.53
<.21



111H-JO
47.8
4.33
443
__
'<.72*
<.72
I ll»»-OO
76.2
4.17
27.3
..
<.59*
<.49
1
<.29 ! <.20






| ,/ COMMENT . ^1
Analyses conducted  In accordance with EPA 600/4-79-020, Methods for Chemical Analysis
of Hater and Hastes.  March  1979.

Analyses performed  in compliance with procedures specified for the Contract Laboratory
Program.

*0ata not used due  to background interference (AL > SOppm).
                                    CERTIFICATION
     MANAOf M. CHCMICAULABOHATONV
    IHIC'TOR^ANALYTICAL Sf K\ ICES
                                        F-121
     recycled paper
                                                               truing' Mnd fti\irnnntt*nl

-------
                              MEMORANDUM
TU:                   Rick Rudy

FROM:                 Gary Hahn .^''''

DATE:                 January 17, 1986

SUBJECT:              Sapp Battery Report; Job No. U-2722

CC:                   Lab File, QA/QC File
Attached is the laboratory report of the analysis conducted on fifteen
samples received at the Analytical Services Center on Decanber 7,
1985. Analysis was performed according to the procedures  set forth  i,i
"Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods.
"SW-846, Second Edition, U.S. EPA, 1982.

All samples, on which this report is based, will be retained by E&E
for a period of 30 days from the date of this report, unless otherwi  ;
instructed by the client.  If additional storage of samples is
requested by the client, a storage fee of Sl.OO/sample container per
month will be charged for each sample, with such charges  accruing
until destruction of the samples is authorized by the client.
GH/cp
enclosure
                                F-124

-------
                         FIXATION STUDY
                        ANALYTICAL DATA
                               F-123
paper                                                     truing* nml rn* tnmmiMii

-------
                 ecology and environment, inc.
                 im*mttion« SovciMfn m tru Envwonm«m
                                     LABORATORY REPORT
                                            FOR
                                        Sapp Battery
          Job No.:
          Sample Date:
          Date Received:
          Sample Type:
U-2722
11/20/85
12/7/85
Soil
Sampled By:    E & E,  Inc.
Delivered By:  Federal Expre- s
                RESULTS OF CHEMICAL  ANALYSIS OF EXTRACTS FROM EP TOXICITY TESTS
E & E Lab Number
Customer Number
  imple Identity
85- 8931G
FSF 03
0.75 ash
0.75 lime
1 soil
8932A
FSF 04
straight


mg/L
8932B
FSF 04
0.5
concrete
1 soil
8932C
FSF 04
1
concrete
1 soil
8932D
FSF 04
1.5
concrete
1 soil
Maximum
Allowable
Concentratioi
(mg/L)
8932F
FSF 0^
0.25 a.,'1
0.25 lii.e
1 soi"
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Lead
Mercury
Selenium
Silver
<0.5
<5.0
<0.1
<0.5
<0.5
<0.02
<0.2
<0.5
<0.5
<5.0
<0.1
<0.5
<0.5
<0.02
<0.2
<0.5
<0.5
<5.0
<0.1
<0.5
<0.5
<0.02
<0.2
<0.5
<0.5
<5.0
<0.1
<0.5
<0.5
<0.02
<0.2
<0.5
<0.5
<5.0
<0.1
<0.5
<0.5
<0.02
<0.2
<0.5
<0.5
<5.0
<0.'.

-------
           ecology and environment, inc.
           Innnmmul SeMXMtt IK m» E
                                LABORATORY REPORT
                                      FOR
                                  Sapp Battery
     Job No.:
     Sample Date:
     Date Received:
     Sample Type:
U-2722
11/20/35
12/7/85
Soil
Sampled By:     E & E, Inc.
Delivered By:   Federal Expr-",,
           RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF EXTRACTS FROM EP TOXICITY TESTS
E & E Lab Number
ustomer Number
Sample Identity


Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Lead
Mercury
Selenium
Si Tver
85- 8931A
FSF 03
straight


<0.5
<5.0
<0.1
<0.5
2.62
' <0.02
<0.2
<0.5
8931B
FSF 03
0.5
concrete
1 soil
<0.5
<5.0
<0.1
<0.5
<0.5
<0.02
<0.2
<0.5
                                        mg/L
                                       8931C
                                      FSF 03
                                        1
                           8931D
                          FSF 03
                           1.5
             8931E
            FSF 03
           0.25 ash
  893 !?
 FSF 03
0.5 asi,
                                                          Maximum
                                                         Allowable
                                                       Concentratio1
                                                          (mg/L)
                                     concrete  concrete  0.25 lime  0.5  li.ie
                                      1 soil
                          1 soil
            1 soil
 1 so:
<0.5
<5.0
<0.1
<0.5
2.62
<0.02
<0.2
<0.5
<0.5
<5.0
<0.1
<0.5
<0.5
<0.02
<0.2
<0.5
<0.5
<5.0
<0.1
<0.5
<0.5
<0.02
<0.2
<0.5
<0.5
<5.0
<0.1
<0.5
<0.5
<0.02
<0.2
<0.5
<0.5
<5.0
<0.1
<0.5
<0.5
<0.02
<0.2
<0.5
<0/j 5.0
<5.C 100.0
<0.1 1.0
<0.f 5.0
<0.5 5.0
<0.0? 0.2
<0.? 1.0
<0.'> 5.0
Analytical References:
"Test Mel-hods for Evaluating Solid Waste Physical/Chemical  Methods",
Second E«-ition, U.S. EPA. 1982
                               Supervising Analyst
                               Date:
                                      F-125
                                                 JB&
    recycled paper

-------
                                                               U-2722
                    QUALITY  CONTROL  FOfl  ACCURACY:
         PERCENT  DIFFERENCE—EPA QUALITY ASSURANCE MATERIALS
Element
Arsenic
Bariun
Cadmium
Chromium
Le«d
Mercury
Selenium
Silver
Concentrations
Known
26.7
11V, 6UU
1150
6500
8000
8.73
8.73
10.9
6000
in uq/L
Determined
29.4
U3.760
1170
6580
8150
9.10
8.3Z
9.50
6320
Percent
Difference
10.1
3.5
3.5
1.2
18.8
4.2
4.7
12.8
5.3
Notei   These results are within the 955 confidence interval for these
       parameters.
                               F-128

-------
                ecology and environment, inc.
                                     LABORATORY REPORT
                                           FOR
                                       Sapp Battery
          Job No.:
          Sample Date:
          Date Received:
          Sample Type:
         U-2722
         11/20/85
         12/7/85
         Soil
Sampled By:    E & E, Inc.
Delivered By:  Federal Exprpis
                RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF  EXTRACTS  FROM EP  TOXICITY TEST?.
E 4 E Lab Number
Customer Number
 ample Identity
85-
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Lead
Mercury
Selenium
Silver
                                             mg/L
8932F
FSF 04
0.5 ash
0.5 lime
1 soil
<0.5
<5.0
<0.5
<0.5
<0.02
<0.2
<0.5
89326
FSF 04
0.75 ash
0.75 lime
1 soil
<0.5
<5.0
<0.5
<0.5
<0.02
<0.2
<0.5
                                                                               Maximum
                                                                              Al lowable
                                                                            Concentration
                                                            IJC.O
                                                              l .0
                                                              -i.O
                                                              1..0
                                                              .1.2
                                                              1.0
                                                              f.O
     Analytical References:
     "Test Methods  for  Evaluating  Solid Waste Physical/Chemical Methods",  SW-8't?
     Second Edition,  U.S.  EPA,  1982
                rtevci«J gtotr
                   Supervising Analyst
                   Date:
                         F-127
         recycled paper
                                                                         and

-------
  61
  !  ecology and environment, inr.
    n1«>r»!KXUl SOKKlnll'" tfw Environment
                         LABORATORY REPORT
                                 FOR
                               Sapp Bettery
Job No.:        U-2933
Sample Date:    12/20/85
Date Received:  2/18/86
Sample Type:    Water
E & E Lab Number  8$-
Customer Number
Aluminum
Anti-iony
Arsenic
Cadmium
Lead
Manganese
Selenium
          RE:   FM-2130
          Sampled  By:     E  i E,  Inc.
          Delivered  By:   Federal  Express
1053
FNW-9B
Res ample
132
<0.06
<0.005
0.003
0.045
0.048
<0.005
1054
FNW-12A
Resample
results
0.725
<0.06
<0.005
0.003
0.123
0.006
<0.005
1055
Alford
Fire
House
in mg/L
<0.10
<0.06
<0.005
<0.001
0.013
0.032
<0.005
Prep
Blank
<0.10
<0.06
<0.005
<0.001
<0.005
<0.f)QK.
<0.00f'
Analytical References;
"Methods  for  the  Chemical  Analysis  of  Water and Wastes", EPA-600/4-79-:20,
March  1983.
                                                                       1L
Supervising Analyst   X'"-(
Date:      ' ' ''-' 'v')   '•'•
                                  F-130

-------
                                MEMORANDUM
  TO:                     Rick Rudy

  FROM:                   Gary Hahn .M //-'/'>

  DATE:                   March 4, 1986

  SUBJECT:                Sapp Battery Report; Job No.  U-2933

  CC:                     Lab File, QA/QC File
  Attached  is  the laboratory report of the analysis  conducted  on  thre.-
  samples  received at the Analytical Services Center on  February  18,
  1986.  Analysis was performed according to the  procedures  set forth it
  "Methods  for the Chemical Analysis of Water and  Wastes",
  EPA-600/4-79-020, March 1983.

  All  samples, on which this report is based, will  be retained by E & ,
  for  a  period of 30 days from the date of this report,  unless otherwi?
  ins'ructed  by the client.  If additional storage of samples  is
  requested by the client, a storage fee of Sl.OO/sample container per
  month  will  be charged for each sample, with such charges  accruing
  until  destruction of the samples is authorized  by the  client.
 GH/cp
 enclosure
                                  F-129
recycled pap6f                                                 i-« tili*^* ami rmirurmir*ni

-------
                                                                     '1-2933
QUALITY CONTROL FOR ACCURACY:   PERCENT  RECOVERY
                FOR SPIKED WATER  SAMPLES
Element
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Cadmium
Le»d
Manganese
Selenium
E & E
Laboratory
No. 86-
1055R
1054R
1054R
1054R
1055R
1055R
1054R
Original
Value

<100
<60
<5.0
3.3
6.1
36
<5.0
Amount
Added
(ug/L)
2000
120
25
2.5
25
200
25
Amount
Determined

1992
120
25
5.65
30.8
231
28.8
Pe cent
n jrovery
•>6
100
!00
•V.
>•)
*
115
                       F-132

-------
                                                                           U-2933
                                QUALITY CONTROL FOR ACCURACY»
                     PERCENT DIFFERENCE—EPA QUALITY ASSURANCE MATERIALS
Element
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
CxJmium
Leed
Manganese
Selenium
Concentrations
Known
729
101
26.7
3.30
42.7
346
10.9
in uq/L
Determined
753
106
30.4
3.37
41.9
366
10.2
Percent
01 f Terence
3.3
6.9
14
2.1
1.9
5.2
6.4
            Notei   These results are within the 955 confidence interval  for  these
                   parameters.
                                           F-131
recycled paper                                                             ,(.,,,.lfv „„,, rmir,inmrm

-------
                              MEMORANDUM
TO:                   Rick Rudy

FROM:                 Gary Hahn

DATE:                 March  6, 1986

SUB.:£CT:              Sapp Battery Report;  Job  U-2940

CC:                   Lab File, QA/QC  File,  P.  Brodzik
Attached is the laboratory report of  the  analysis  conducted on one
sample received at the Analytical Services  Center  on  February 19,
1986.  Analysis was performed  according to  the  procedures  set forth  '.
"isst Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods,
"S.V 846, Second Edition, U.S.  EPA, 1982.

This composite sample will be  used for the  fixation study.   The
leachate from the EP Toxicity  test on the "fixed"  samples  will be
analyzed for lead only.

All samples, on which this report  is  based,  will be retained by E  & i-
for a period of 30 days from the date of  this report,  unless otherwise
instructed by the client.  If  additional  storage of samples is
reqi.asted by the client, a storage fee of Sl.OO/sample container per
month will be charged for each sample, with  such charges  accruing
until destruction of the samples is authorized  by  the  client.
Gh/cp
enclosure
                                F-134

-------
                              QUALITY CONTROL FOR  PRECISION
                            RESULTS OF ANALYSIS  OF  REPLICATE
                                ANALYSES OF WATER  SAMPLES
                                                                              U-2933
Element
Aluminum
,vntimony
Arsenic
Cadmium
Lead
Manganeee
Selenium
E A E
Laboratory
No. 86-
1055
1054
1054
1054
1055
1055
1054
Original
Analysis
<0.10
<0.06
<0.005
0.003
0.013
0.032
<0.005
Replicate
Analysis
<0.10
<0.06
<0.005
0.003
0.006
0.036
<0.005
Relative
Percent
Difference
RPO
~
—
—
0
74
12
—
                                           F-133
recycled paper
                                                                         t*r*il«iK\ ami rtmrmmtrm

-------
                        QUALITY CONTROL FOR PRECISION
                      RESULTS OF ANALYSIS OF REPLICATE
                     ANALYSES OF E.P. TOXICITY EXTRACTS
                                                                        U-2940
Element
  E & E
Laboratory
 No. 86-
Onginal
Analysis
Replicate
Analysis
 Relative
 Percent
Difference
   RPO
Arsenic

Barium

Cadmium

Chromium

Lead

Selenium

Silver
  1126

  1126

  1126

  1126

  1126

  1126

  1126
 <0.5

 <5.0

 <0.1

 <0.5

  59.4

 <0.5
 <0.5

 <5.0

 <0.1

 <0.5

  51.8

 <0.5
                                   F-136

-------
      ecology and environment, inc.
                           LABORATORY REPORT

                                   FOR
                                Sapp  Battery
  Job No.:        U-2940
  Date Received:  2/19/86
  Sarrple Type:    Soil Comp.
                Sampled By:  E & E,  Inc.
        RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF EXTRACTS  FROM  EP  TOXICITY TEST'
                                          mq/L
  E ! E Lab Number  86-
  Customer Number
       1126
FSG-53A 75A 87A
    538 766 878
    53C 76C 87C
Prep
Blank
                                                                    Maximum
                                                                   Alh.vable
                                                                 Concer ration
Sample Identity
Arsenic
Barium
Caomium
Chromium
Lead
Mercury
Selenium
Silver

<0.5
<5.0
<0.1
<0.5
59.4
<0.02
<0.5
<0.5

<0.5
<5.0
<0.1
<0.5
<0.5
<0.02
<0.5
<0.5

5..)
loo.:
i •.
S.i.
5.u
Q.I
1..,'
5 1
  Analytical References:
  "Test Methods for Evaluating  Solid  Waste  Physical/Chemical Methods", SW-846
  Second Edition, U.S. EPA,  1982
                                  Supervising Analyst  .-
     t»rycl<«1 p»(W«t
      Date:
       F-135
recycled paper
                                                               anil fnvinmmrtit

-------