EPA/540/2-89/010
SUPERFUNDTREATABILITY
CLEARINGHOUSE
Document Reference:
Ecology and Environment, Inc. "Summary Report on the Field Investigation of the
Sapp Battery Site. Jackson County, Florida." Approximately 170 pp. in two volumes.
Technical report prepared for Florida Department of Environmental Regulation
(FDER). November 1986.
EPA LIBRARY NUMBER:
Superfund Ttestability Clearinghouse • EURY
-------
SUPERFUND TREATABILITY CLEARINGHOUSE ABSTRACT
Treatment Process:
Media:
Document Reference:
Document Type:
Contact:
Site Name:
Location of Test:
Immobilization - Cement and Fly Ash Solidification
Soil/Clayey
Ecology and Environment, Inc. "Summary Report on
the Field Investigation of the Sapp Battery Site."
Jackson County, Florida." Approximately 170 pp. in
two volumes. Technical report prepared for Florida
Department of Environmental Regulation (FDER).
November 1986.
Contractor/Vendor Treatability Study
Kristen Teepen
U.S. EPA - Region IV
345 Courtland Street, N.E.
Atlanta, GA 30365
404-347-4727
Sapp Battery Site, Jackson County, FL (NPL)
Jackson County, FL
BACKGROUND; This treatability study presents the results of field
investigations at the Sapp Battery site in Florida, an abandoned battery
recycling operation. The site is estimated to contain 14,300 cubic yards
of soils with lead levels in excess of 1,000 ppm. The soils in the
immediate vicinity of the site are a mixture of brown sand and yellow-brown
sandy loam to a depth of five feet. A detailed QA/QC plan and analytical
protocols is described in the second volume to the study. A sampling
program and fixation study was conducted to evaluate cementitious and
pozzolanic cementation technologies for leachate minimization potential.
This abstract will focus on the fixation study and the ability of the
processes evaluated to immobilize heavy metals.
OPERATIONAL INFORMATION; The cement base solidification process involves
sealing the contaminated soil in a portland cement matrix. The pozzolanic
process involves sealing the contaminated soil in a matrix of lime and fly
ash. Soil samples from 0 to 5 and 5 to 10 foot depth intervals were
composited and used. Analysis of the composite sample showed 7100 mg/kg of
lead. Soil samples were mixed with varying percentages of solidification
agent and water and allowed to set.
PERFORMANCE; Three pozzolanic, three cementitious solidification mixes and
one control were prepared for the EP Toxicity leaching test. The results
of the chemical fixation analysis are shown in Table 1. The results
indicate that the cementitious mixture was much more effective in binding
lead than the pozzolanic cement mixture (fly ash and lime). The portland
cement mixture exhibited excellent binding capacity for all samples (1126A
through C). Compared to the maximum allowable concentration of 5 mgs/liter
(EP Toxicity), the analysis of the fixed samples were at or near the lead
detection limit. Lead concentrations in the leachate from the pozzolanic
3/89-29 Document Number: EURY
NOTE: Quality assurance of data may not be appropriate for all uses.
-------
mixture were much higher than in the portland cement mixture. The authors
offer no explanation for the difference but did indicate that the soils can
be solidified to reduce lead concentrations in the leachate to acceptable
levels. It is anticipated that cement requirements could be reduced and
heavy metal control increased through process optimization.
CONTAMINANTS;
Analytical data is provided in the treatability study report. The
breakdown of the contaminants by treatability group is:
Treatability Group CAS Number Contaminants
Wll-Volatile Metals 7439-92-1 Lead
NOTE: This is a partial listing of data. Refer to the document for more
information.
3/89-29 Document Number: EURY
NOTE: Quality assurance of data may not be appropriate for all uses.
-------
TABLE 1
RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF EXTRACTS
FROM EP TOXICITY TESTS
Samples
Maximum
Allowable EP
Toxicity
Concentrations
(mg/1)
Pozzolanic
E & E Lab Number 86-*
Sample Identity
Lead (mg/1)
1126D
Ash: Lime: Soil
0.25:0.25:1
76.4
1126E
Ash: Lime: Soil
0.5:0.5:1
<0.06
1126F
Ash: Lime: Soil Blank
0.75:0.75:1
7.17 <0.06
5.0
Cement itious
E & E Lab Number 86-*
Sample Identity
Lead (mg/1)
1126A
Concrete: Soil
0.5:1
0.085
1126B
Concrete: Soil
1:1
<0.06
1126C
Concrete: Soil
1.5:1
<0.06 5.0
* 86-1126 is a composite of 9 samples. The untreated composite sample has a lead concentration of 71,000
mg/kg. The EP Toxicity Test on the control sample (untreated composite soil material) yielded 59.4 mg/1.
3/89-29
Document Number: EURY
-------
PA
o
FM-2901 Oil 70
SUMMARY REPORT ON THE
FIELD INVESTIGATION OF THE
SAPP BATTERY SITE,
JACKSON COUNTY, FLORIDA
VOLUME 1 - REPORT
November 1986
Prepared for:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION
2600 Blairstone Road
Tallahassee, Florida 32301
ecology and environment, inc.
195 SUGG ROAD, P.O. BOX 0, BUFFALO, NEW YORK 14225, TEL 716-632-4481
International Specialists in the Environment
recycled paper
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section Page
1 INTRODUCTION 1-1
1.1 SITE DESCRIPTION, HISTORY, AND PAST
INVESTIGATIONS 1-4
1.1.1 Site Description 1-4
1.1.2 Site History 1-7
1.1.3 Past Investigations 1-8
1.2 GEOLOGY 1-12
1.2.1 General Geologic Structure 1-15
1.2.2 Regional Soil Conditions 1-16
1.3 SURFACE WATER HYDROLOGY 1-19
1.4 HYDROGEOLOGY 1-21
1.5 REGIONAL SURFACE WATER, SURFACE WATER
SEDIMENT, AND BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS 1-23
1.5.1 Surface Water and Sediment 1-23
1.5.2 Algae Samples 1-26
1.5.3 Macroinvertebrates 1-26
1.5.4 Fishes 1-33
1.5.5 Heavy Metals Task Force Investigation .... 1-33
2 FIELDWORK 2-1
2.1 PRIORITY POLLUTANT CONFIRMATION STUDY 2-1
2.2 SOIL SAMPLING/FIXATION STUDY 2-6
2.2.1 Soil Sampling 2-6
2.2.2 Fixation Study 2-14
2.3 SEDIMENT SAMPLING 2-19
recycled pap«f «-»lof» and rnvininmrm
-------
Table of Contents (Cont.)
Section Page
2.4 GROUNDWATER INVESTIGATION 2-25
2.4.1 Residential Well Sampling 2-25
2.4.2 Monitoring Well Installation and
Development 2-25
2.4.3 Monitoring Well Sample Collection 2-28
2.4.4 Slug and Specific Capacity Tests 2-31
3 RESULTS OF ANALYSES AND DATA INTERPRETATION 3-1
3.1 PRIORITY POLLUTANT CONFIRMATION STUDY 3-1
3.1.1 Soils 3-1
3.1.2 Sediments 3-2
3.1.3 Surface Water 3-3
3.1.4 Groundwater 3-4
3.1.5 Conclusions 3-5
3.2 SOILS 3-7
3.2.1 Surface Soils (0 to 0.5-Foot Interval) ... 3-7
3.2.2 B Interval Soils (0.5 to 2.5 Feet) ....... 3-12
3.2.3 C Interval Soils (2.5 to 5.0 Feet) 3-12
3.2.4 D and E Interval Soils (5.0 to 7.5
Feet and 7.5 to 10.0 Feet) 3-17
3.2.5 Northwest Landfill Characterization 3-22
3.2.6 Soils Investigation Summary 3-26
3.2.7 Fixation Study 3-27
3.3 SEDIMENTS 3-30
3.3.1 Northwest Swamp 3-30
3.3.2 West Swamp 3-30
3.3.3 East Swamp 3-33
3.3.4 Southeast Swamp 3-34
3.3.5 Steele City Bay 3-34
3.4 GROUNDWATER 3-38
3.4.1 Hydrologic Analysis 3-38
3.4.1.1 Aquifer Potentiometric
Surfaces 3-38
3.4.1.2 Aquifer Physical Test Results ... 3-41
IV
-------
Table of Contents (Cont.)
Section Page
3.4.2 Chemical Analysis 3-44
3.4.2.1 Aquifer Field Parameters 3-44
3.4.2.2 Aquifer Lead Concentrations 3-46
3.4.2.3 Aquifer Selected Metals
Concentrations 3-52
3.4.3 Contaminant Migration 3-55
3.5 COMPUTER SIMULATION OF CONTAMINANT FRONT
MIGRATION 3-58
3.5.1 Model Description 3-58
3.5.1.1 FEMWASTE Model for all
Aquifers at the Sapp Battery
Site 3-58
3.5.1.2 Random-Walk Model for the
Floridan Aquifer at the Sapp
Battery Site 3-60
3.5.1.3 Model Parameters 3-60
3.5.2 Simulation Results 3-63
3.5.2.1 FEMWASTE Model Predictions
for all Aquifers 3-63
3.5.2.2 Random-Walk Predictions for
Floridan Aquifer 3-70
3.5.3 Random-Walk Model Prediction of Various
Floridan Aquifer Pumping and Treatment
Schemes 3-70
4 QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL 4-1
4.1 FIELDWORK 4-1
4.1.1 Documentation 4-1
4.1.2 Samples 4-2
4.2 LABORATORY SAMPLE ANALYSIS 4-7
4.2.1 Analytical Methods 4-7
4.2.1.1 Organic Analyses 4-7
4.2.1.2 Metals Analyses 4-8
4.2.2 Reporting and Quality Assurance 4-12
4.2.3 Analytical Quality Assurance Results
and Discussion 4-14
recycled paper „•..!..«» ami .-min.niii.-m
-------
Table of Contents (Cont.)
Section Page
4.2.3.1 Organic Analyses 4-14
4.2.3.2 Inorganic Analyses 4-16
4.2.3.3 Data Reporting 4-18
5 CONCLUSIONS 5-1
6 BIBLIOGRAPHY 6-1-
Appendix
A FSU SURFACE WATER AND SURFACE WATER SEDIMENT DATA A-l
B PRIORITY POLLUTANT CONFIRMATION SURVEY ANALYTICAL
DATA B-l
C SOIL AND SEDIMENT SAMPLE ANALYTICAL DATA C-l
D 6ROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL DATA D-l
E DRILLER'S LOGS OF NEWLY INSTALLED WELLS E-l
F DATA CATALOG F-l
G ANTIMONY SPIKE LOSSES G-l
Plate
1 Sapp Battery Site Aerial Photograph Inside
Back
Cover
2 Sapp Battery Site Detailed Base Map Inside
Back
Cover
-------
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS
Figure Page
1-1 Location of Sapp Battery Site 1-2
1-2 Sapp Battery Site Description Map 1-5
1-3 Site Photograph Showing Plastic Liner 1-6
1-4 Generalized Stratigraphic Column for Jackson County,
Florida 1-13
1-5 North-South Geologic Cross Section through Jackson
County, Florida 1-14
1-6 Fracture Lineations and Sinkhole Locations 1-17
1-7 Chipola River Project Study Area and Sample Stations .. 1-24
1-8 Chipola River Sampling Station Locations 1-35
1-9 Finfish Collection Sites for Heavy Metals Analyses .... 1-36
1-10 Cadmium in Fish in Chipola River FGFC/USFWS
Sampling Stations 1-37
2-1 Priority Pollutant Confirmation Study Sample
Locations 2-4
2-2 Surface Composite Sample Locations 2-8
2-3 Soil Boring Sample Locations 2-10
2-4 On-Site and Adjacent Sediment Sample Locations 2-20
2-5 Off-Site Sediment Sample Locations 2-21
2-6 Locations of Residential Wells Sampled November 2-4,
1985 2-26
2-7 Locations of Sapp Battery Site Monitoring Wells 2-27
2-8 Typical Monitoring Well Construction 2-30
vii
recycled paper tt-
-------
List of Illustrations (Cont.)
Figure Page
3-1 Occurrence of Battery Chips 3-8
3-2 Lead Concentrations (mg/kg) in the Surface Soil
Composite Samples 3-9
3-3 Lead Concentrations (mg/kg) m the A Interval
(0 to 0.5 Feet) of the On-site Soil Borings ...,._... 3-10
-f "~
3-4 Lead Versus Antimony in the A Interval (0 to 0.5^
Foot Depth) in FSA Samples Along the West Bank of the
West Swamp , 3-13
3-5 Lead Concentrations (mg/kg) in the B Interval
(0.5 - 2.5 Feet) Samples of the On-Site Scrfl * " fS"
Borings 3-14
3-6 Lead Versus Antimony in the B Interval (0.5 tfr-
Foot Depth) in FSA Samples Along the West Bank of the
West Swamp ................................ ...»>.. ... 3-15
3-7 Lead Concentrations (mg/kg) in the C Interval "'
(2.5 - 5.0 Feet) Samples of the On-Site Soil ~
Borings ......................................... ...... 3-16
3-8 Lead Versus Antimony in the C Interval (2.5 to. 5.0 -_
Foot Depth) in FSA Samples Along the West Bank of the
West Swamp ......... sz ........... %, . .^ ................. -* 3-18
3-9 Lead Concentrations (mg/kg) in the^fr Interval
(5.0 - 7.5 Feet) Samples of the On-Site* Soil
Bor i ngs ............................... -« ....... ...... ,^.3-20,
"• "~~
3-10 Lead Concentrations (mg/kg) in the E^Iffilerval r':.^ T ^'
(7.5 - 10.0 Feet) Samples of the On-5|tf:Soil , --, .^^-
Bori ngs .................. ;........ .-^Sl ........ -£. . V. . " 3^1
3-11 Lead Versus Antimony In the D Interval ^0 to 7.5 -^^.....-
Foot Depth) in FSA Samples Along the W«S£~8ank of the ~ " ^
West Swamp ............................................ 3P23
-
3-12 Lead Versus Antimony in the E Interval {7.5 to 10,0
Foot Depth) 1n FSA Samples Along the W6&- Sink of--.. :
the West Swamp ........................... .."... , ---- — 3-2.4
3-13 Depth of Battery Casing Fill in Northwest' Landfill
Area .................................. ;.....% ....... ..*3-25
-,____ __ _ . _^i • - . - --
3-14 Lead Concentrations (mg/kg) in On-Site A, fr^and C
Interval Sediment Samples ............ ;:...:r;V. ......... 3-31
3-15 Lead Concentrations (mg/kg) in Off -Site A, B, and C "' &
Interval Sediment Samples ............................. 3-35
v i i i
-------
List of Illustrations (Cont.)
F i gu re Page
3-16 Generalized Potentjometric Map of the Surficial
Aquifer System, 3-39
3-17 Generalized Potentiometric Map of the intermediate
Aqu i fer System 3-40
3-18 Generalized Potentiometric Map of the Floridan Aquifer
System 3-42
3-19 Lead Concentrations (ppb) in Monitoring Wells Open to
the Surficial Aquifer System 3-47
3-20 Lead Concentrations (ppb) in Monitoring Wells Open to
Intermediate Aquifer System 3-48
3-21 Lead Concentrations (ppb) in Monitoring Wells Open to
the Floridan Aquifer System 3-49
3-22 Lead Concentrations (ppb) in Residential Wells 3-50
3-23 Finite Element Grid System for the Sapp Battery
Site 3-59
3-24 Random-Walk Finite Difference Grid System for the
Floridan Aquifer at Sapp Battery 3-61
3-25 Computed Contaminant Plume, 1 Year Prediction (1986)
Surficial Aquifer (FEMWASTE) 3-64
3-26 Computed Contaminant Plume, 1 Year Prediction (1986)
Intermediate Aquifer (FEMWASTE) 3-65
3-27 Computed Contaminant Plume, 1 Year Prediction (1986)
Floridan Aquifer (FEMWASTE) 3-66
3-28 Computed Contaminant Plume, 5 Year Prediction (1990)
Surficial Aquifer (FEMWASTE) 3-67
3-29 Computed Contaminant Plume, 5 Year Prediction (1990)
Intermediate Aquifer (FEMWASTE) 3-68
3-30 Computed Contaminant Plume, 5 Year Prediction (1990)
Floridan Aquifer (FEMWASTE) 3-69
3-31 Computed Lead Plume, 5 Year Prediction (1990)
Floridan Aquifer (Random-Walk) 3-71
3-32 Computed Lead Plume, 10 Year Prediction (1995)
Floridan Aquifer (Random-Walk) 3-72
i x
recycled paper «•.•!„«» and rm.nmm.-ni
-------
LIST OF TABLES
Table Page
1-1 Lead, Aluminum, and Cadmium Concentrations in Stump
Creek, Little Dry Creek, and Dry Creek Surface
Waters Downgradient of Sapp Battery Site 1-27
1-2 Lead, Aluminum, and Cadmium Concentrations in
Stump Creek, Little Dry Creek, Dry Creek Sedi-
ments Downgradient of the Sapp Battery Site 1-28
1-3 pH values for Stump Creek, Little Dry Creek, and
Dry Creek Surface Water Downgradient of the Sapp
Battery Site 1-30
1-4 Community Indices of Algae Taken with Diatometers
at Four Stations in the Little Dry Creek System
(quarterly, 1985 to 1985) 1-31
1-5 Net Plankton (numbers/m3 x 0.0001) Taken in Little
Dry Creek - Dry Creek System 1-32
2-1 Soil/Sediment Samples Collected for the Priority
Pollutant Confirmation Study 2-2
2-2 Surface Water/Groundwater Samples Collected for the
Priority Pollutant Confirmation Study 2-3
2-3 Organization of Collected Soil Samples 2-7
2-4 Soil Solidification - Cementitious Matrix 2-16
2-5 Soil Solidification - Pozzolanic Matrix 2-18
2-6 Organization of Collected Sediment Samples 2-22
2-7 Construction Data for Supplementary Monitoring Wells ... 2-29
3-1 Results of Chemical Analysis of Extracts from EP
Toxicity Tests 3-28
3-2 Model Parameters Used in Computer Program 3-62
XI
recycled paper «•„!,•«» and rntininmrm
-------
List of Tables (Cont.)
Table Page
3-3 Various Random-Walk Model Predictions for Pumping and
Treating the Floridan Aquifer at the Sapp Battery
Site 3-74
4-1 Soil QA/QC Samples Analysis Requirements 4-3
4-2 Sediment QA/QC Samples Analysis Requirements 4-3
4-3 Monitoring Well QA/QC Samples Analysis Requirements 4-4
4-4 Residential Well QA/QC Samples Analysis Requirements ... 4-4
4-5 Surface Water QA/QC Samples Analysis Requirements 4-4
4-6 Summary of Contract Required Detection Limits 4-9
xn
-------
1. INTRODUCTION
This report presents the results of the field investigation con-
ducted by Ecology and Environment, Inc., (E & E) at the Sapp Battery
site in Jackson County, Florida. The investigation was performed
under contract to the Florida Department of Environmental Regulation
(FDER). Tht Sipp Battery s-1te^s on the uU.
1 ty -LI st- «s*r
(lead) and spent ac*d eontaftlnat ion o*-?M«t Iwa It tUaqytfeFI&siem under -
1s th«-3N»eefe reitrtt
disposal
The stffc
fv*b*
site is on a topographic high rela-
tive to the cypress swamps of Steele City and Bush Hammock Bays,
southeast and northwest of the study area, respectively. The
topography of the area reflects the fluvial and karstic processes that
have occurred in the past and continue to occur.
The primary objectives of the field investigation were to supple-
ment the results of previous site investigations performed by FDER and
EPA, and to provide site characterization support for the feasibility
study (FS). Km>Mta4 Wlt&mto^tteilafZtytytb: fiifetminr
•». ^, . „_.,.. ,r., .»„T, .^_ , "* - ».:^ «* -f'*ilP**'-fr*s*.±-s5iit&/f:-+i& *&*Mjr
tht lite- ttciVlty. Pr1«r to Uegthnlng^the mat'n sinp"tlncf'effort, a ?
priority pt»llutanf-Cflf#4
-------
Figure 1-1 LOCATION OF SAPP BATTERY SITE
1-2
-------
to aid in the selection of analytical parameters for the main investi-
gation. In addition, background soil, sediment, groundwater, and sur-
face water samples were collected for comparison purposes. This study
was performed during the week of September 17, 1985.
After the priority pollutant confirmation study was completed,
soil, sediment, and groundwater samples were collected and analyzed
periodically. Surface water and biological samples were not collected
in order to avoid duplication of: 1) an EPA-funded study by
Dr. Robert Livingston, of the Florida State University Biology
Department, who performed an integrated evaluation of surface water
conditions and biota in local drainage basins for field verification
of laboratory bioassays; 2) the FDER Remedial Investigation (RI) in
which surface water samples were collected; and 3) a joint FOER, HRS,
and Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission Heavy Metals Task
Force project during which surface water and biological samples were
collected and analyzed.
Soil sampling was conducted from October 28 to November 11, 1985.
This phase of the study consisted of collecting soil samples over
several depth intervals (usually down to 10 feet) from areas not char-
acterized by previous investigations.
Sediment sampling was performed from November 11 to November 27,
1985. This phase of the study consisted of collecting sediment sam-
ples over several depth intervals on-site and in the surrounding off-
site cypress swamps.
The first phase of groundwater sampling, conducted on November 2
and 3, 1985, consisted of collecting water samples from residential
wells surrounding the site. From November 6 to December 12, 1985,
additional shallow, Intermediate, and deep monitoring wells were
installed to supplement the existing on-site monitoring network. New
and existing monitoring wells were sampled from November 17 to Decem-
ber 12, 1985. Sample collection techniques, locations, and the chemi-
cal parameters for analysis of soil, sediment, and groundwater samples
are discussed in detail in Section 2.
In addition to the sampling program, a fixation study and slug/
specific capacity tests were performed from November 20 to December
18, 1985. The fixation study was conducted to evaluate cementitious
and pozzolanic cementation technologies for leachate production poten-
tial. The results of the fixation study will be presented in Section
1-3
recycled papef .-...lo^ and rmimnmrm
-------
2. The slug/specific capacity tests were conducted to determine the
hydrologic characteristics of each of the three aquifer systems under-
lying the site.
Fieldwork was completed by December 20, 1985.
Most of the soil and sediment samples taken from the deeper sam-
pling intervals were archived pending evaluation of the analytical
results from the shallower intervals. Ninety-six soil samples (from
the 5- to 7.5-foot and 7.5- to 10-foot intervals) and 33 sediment
samples (18 from the 5- to 7.5-foot and 7.5- to 10-foot intervals for
the 10-foot borings, and 15 from the 2.5- to 5-foot interval for the
5-foot borings) were archived. Based on E & E's evaluation of the
shallower interval data, FDER agreed that 54 of the archived soil
samples should be analyzed. These samples were sent to the laboratory
on January 8, 1986, for analysi's and the results are included in this
report.
As requested by FDER, the 25 residential wells sampled November 2
and 3, 1985, were resampled in March 1986. These samples were ana-
lyzed for the same parameters as the initial residential well
sampling. The results are presented in this report.
1.1 SITE DESCRIPTION, HISTORY, AND PAST INVESTIGATIONS
1.1.1 Site Description
The Sapp Battery site is located in the heart of the densely
vegetated rural Florida Panhandle (Figure 1-2; Plate 1, inside back
cover). The site in its present condition is dominated by a large
bluish-gray synthetic liner which extends over a newly excavated area
(Figure 1-3). This area was previously the site of an acid holding
pond. A building foundation on the site is all that remains of the
Sapp Battery plant. The foundation is situated on a relatively high
elevation at the north end of the liner. Remnants of a truck weigh
scale and acid drainage trough are apparent on the west side of the
foundation. The former Sapp residence was located south of the plant,
at the entrance to the site. Only two small building foundations
remain of the residence. The synthetic liner and plant foundation are
surrounded by a non-continuous layer of broken battery casings. In
the vicinity of the former Sapp residence, the battery chips are more
weathered and rounded than those found anywhere else, except
1-4
-------
n
n
a
r>
01
o
GENERAL LOCATION OF
OLD FISHING POND
O bO
20O
SCALE
4OO
60O
BOO FEET
010
bO
ISO
ZOOMErtHS
Figure 1- 2 SAPP BATTERY SITE DESCRIPTION MAP
-------
Figure 1-3 SITE PHOTOGRAPH SHOWING PLASTIC LINER
-------
at the location of the old plant. Although the exact location of the
old plant is unknown, its general vicinity is believed to be several
hundred feet east of the larger and newer plant foundation on the east
side of the west swamp.
North of the new plant foundation is a small landfill area which
has been primarily filled in with battery chips. This area is
referred to here as the Northwest Landfill. According to historical
aerial photographs, this area was once a small fishing pond.
A complex system of swamps surrounds the site except directly
west of the new plant. These swamp areas include:
o The West Swamp, which receives direct drainage from the old
acid holding pond and plant foundation, areas;
o The East Swamp, which receives drainage from the West Swamp
and northern limits of the area;
o The Northwest Swamp, which receives drainage from the North-
west Landfill area;
o The Southeast Swamp, which receives drainage from the East
Swamp; and
o Steele City Bay, which receives drainage from the Southeast
Swamp.
Except for the Northwest Swamp area, all of these surface water
bodies show contamination, as evidenced by the deterioration of sur-
rounding vegetation, particularly cypress trees, many of which have
been killed.
1.1.2 Site History
In 1970, Sapp Battery Service, Inc., (Sapp Battery) began to
recycle lead from used automobile batteries at the Jackson County
location. The Sapp Battery operation gradually expanded and, by 1978,
the facility was processing approximately 50,000 used batteries a
week. The residual acid from the smashed battery casings was allowed
1-7
recycled paD6r rculog* anil rmimnmrm
-------
to run southeast down a slope adjacent to the processing plant and
into the West Swamp. Drainage from the West Swamp evidently flows
south and east into Steele City Bay, which connects to Little Dry
Creek approximately 1 mile from the site.
Broken battery casings were primarily disposed of in a man-made
fishing pond north of the facility and along the west bank of the West
Swamp. However, pieces of battery casings are scattered over most of
the site west of the West Swamp and south of the filled fishing pond.
In 1977, FDER became involved with the site in response to com-
plaints from the local population. As a result of FDER's involvement,
Sapp Battery attempted to contain their contamination on-site through
a series of berms and channels and the holding pond. However, this
limited remediation action was a failure, and further legal action
resulted in the closing of the Sapp Battery operation in January 1980
(Watts 1984). Later in 1980, EPA initiated emergency remedial action
at the site in an attempt to control runoff and leaching of wastes
into groundwater. A berm was installed along the site's downgradient
boundaries and lime was added to several affected locations.
1.1.3 Past Investigations
The Sapp Battery site was added to the National Priority List in
September 1982, and the Groundwater Section of FDER, with support from
the U.S. Geological Survey, began an RI of the site (Watts 1984). At
the same time, Dr. Robert J. Livingston of Florida State University
began the biological work in the affected drainage basin.
The RI primarily consisted of:
o Delineating battery casing disposal areas;
o Collecting shallow soil samples in the area between the plant
and the acid holding pond;
o Collecting surface water and sediment samples from sample
stations located throughout the Steele City Bay drainage basin
to Little Dry Creek; and
1-8
-------
o Characterizing the physical and chemical parameters of the
groundwater system in the site vicinity by sampling on-site
and residential wells.
The RI concluded that the Sapp Battery site contained:
o A large amount of landfilled battery chips (estimated volume,
28,000 cubic yards);
o High lead levels in the upper soil horizon that decreased with
depth;
o High concentrations of lead, manganese, and aluminum in
on-site and near-site (downgradient) surface water and sedi-
ment samples;
o Lead contamination at moderate to high levels in the surficial
and intermediate aquifer systems; and
o Low levels of lead (which most likely seeped into the Floridan
aquifer system via the sinkhole network in the area) in down-
gradient residential wells. Previous sampling of residential
wells by EPA in March 1980 and by the Florida Department of
Health and Rehabilitative Services (DHRS) in August 1982 had
not found any violations of drinking water standards; however,
the majority of these wells were located upgradient from the
Sapp Battery site.
In August 1983, EPA completed a limited feasibility study (FS) to
determine the need for initial remedial measures for the Sapp Battery
site (NUS Corporation 1983). The objective of this FS was to develop
remedial alternatives that would minimize further groundwater and sur-
face water contamination and minimize impacts to public health and
safety. The EPA FS concluded that in-place capping of the site with a
synthetic liner was the most cost-effective remedial technique; how-
ever, the EPA FS further stated that in order to completely evaluate
1-9
recycled pap«r „•„!,•«» nml r.imr..m,i,-m
-------
the effectiveness of the cap, gaps in the soils data would have to be
filled. Because of this data gap, the EPA FS was not finalized.
Based on the RI and an assessment of the need for initial reme-
dial measures by Environmental Science and Engineering, Inc., FDER
performed additional soil sampling in the area of the acid holding
pond to support an Initial Remedial Measures (IRM) program (ESE, Inc.,
and OHM Co. 1984; OHM Co. 1984a, b). As a result of this sampling
effort, it was concluded that a large volume of soil (14,300 cubic
yards) contained lead levels in excess of 1,000 milligrams per
kilogram (mg/kg) and that surface lead contamination levels of 500
mg/kg existed south and east of the plant and around the acid holding
pond. The recommended IRM was to install a temporary surface seal
over soils with lead levels greater than 500 mg/kg.
In 1984, FDER also completed the remedial response objectives and
evaluation criteria for a comprehensive FS at the Sapp Battery site
(ESE, Inc., 1984). In general, this report addressed response objec-
tives that protect human health, reduce the potential for contaminant
migration, and comply with Florida water standards.
Based on the selected IRMs, FDER completed the following remedial
measures during 1984 and 1985:
o Removal of about 9,000 cubic yards of contaminated soil and
sediment from the acid holding pond area;
o Backfilling of the acid holding pond and excavated areas with
clean soil and capping of the area with a synthetic membrane;
o Installation of a rip-rap filter drain where the drainage from
the liner empties into the West Swamp;
o Installation of a chain link fence and warning signs to secure
the site;
o Installation of a berm and weir system to control storm water
runoff;
1-10
-------
o On-site treatment of contaminated water from the acid holding
pond;
o Removal of a large pile of battery casing debris and contami-
nated soi 1.
The Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services in Jackson
County conducted blood lead tests on 1,565 persons from Alford,
Cottondale, and the surrounding area in December 1984. Several per-
sons were found to have abormally high blood lead levels. Further
investigation related these findings to conditions in their homes or
work places. No connection with Sapp Battery was established.
In addition to the above investigations, a variety of other stud-
ies have been performed. These include: 1) air and surface water
sampling performed during the IRMs; 2) nutrient testing of on-site
soils by ESE, Inc.; 3) surface water and sediment analyses by the
Heavy Metals Task Force (FDER, HRS, and Florida Game and Fresh Water
Fish Commission); and 4) groundwater and soil sampling, including the
testing of residential wells at several residences near the Sapp
Battery site, by ESE, Inc.
Plate 1, an aerial photograph from November 6, 1985, and Plate 2,
a topographic map, were generated as part of the current investiga-
tion. They illustrate existing condition of the Sapp Battery site.
1-11
Pdp6f rc<»i
-------
1.2 GEOLOGY
The Sapp Battery site lies within the Marianna River Valley Low-
lands, the largest physiographic unit in Jackson County (Moore 1955).
Moore (1955) states that this terraced lowland area was formed through
a complicated sequence of -stream erosion, deposition, and capture
which resulted in the dissection and lowering of the Miocene-age sur-
face. Although dissolution of the underlying limestone is not con-
sidered primarily responsible for the development of the lowlands, the
rectangular stream patterns revealed by aerial photomosaics of Jackson
County suggest that joints and fractures in the limestone may have
exerted a strong influence on the drainage network that developed in
the overlying clastic sediments.
Figure 1-4 is a generalized stratigraphic column for Jackson
County. Figure 1-5 is a north-south geologic cross section through
Jackson County which essentially passes through the Sapp Battery site.
The following discussion of the geologic units in the vicinity of the
site is summarized from Moore (1955).
The Crystal River Formation, including the uppermost Bumpnose
Limestone Member, is the only unit of the Eocene-age Ocala Group which
has been recognized in Jackson County. The absence of the older
Williston and Inglis Formations of the Ocala Group is attributed to
the Jackson County area occupying a structurally positive position
that was not submerged by the transgressing sea until the late Eocene.
The Crystal River Formation is a white to cream, generally soft,
granular, fossil iferous, permeable limestone that is often entirely
composed of orbitoidal foraminiferal tests and bryozoa. It has fre-
quently been hardened to a dense limestone by recrystallization. The
Crystal River Formation lies at or near land surface over most of the
northern half of Jackson County. To the south, which includes the
Sapp Battery site, the unit shows greater variations in local relief
and is covered by varying thicknesses of younger sediments (Figures
1-4 and 1-5). The thickness of the Crystal River Formation, including
the Bumpnose Limestone, is about 220 feet in Jackson County.
The Bumpnose Limestone Member of the Crystal River Formation is a
white, soft, easily crumbled, fossiliferous (foraminifera and bryozoa)
limestone that is generally somewhat glauconitic (especially near the
1-12
-------
ERA
U
-
0
IM
O
z
IU
U
PERIOD
E
Z
E
IU
3
a
E
E
IU
H
EPOCH
RECENT
PLEISTOCENE
PLIOCENE
MIOCENE
OLIGOCENE
EOCENE
UPPER
FORMATION
Rivtr
floodplam alluvium
Mannt and fluvial ttrract
deposit!
Citrontllt Formation
Tampa Formation
Suwanntt Limtnont
Mananna limtstont
Group
BumpnoM Umettont Mtmbtr
Crynal
Rivtr
Formation
SOURCE Modified from Moor*. 1955
Figure 1-4 GENERALIZED STRATIGRAPHIC COLUMN
FOR JACKSON COUNTY, FLORIDA
1-13
recycled paper
t*itilo|{\ Mint
-------
BUMPNOSE
LIMESTONE
MEMBER
LOWER CRYSTAL RIVER
FORMATION
400
SOURCE . Modified from Moor* 1965.
SCALE
O 1
12 MILES
024
16 KILOMETER
Figure 1-5 NORTH SOUTH GEOLOGIC CROSS SECTION THROUGH JACKSON
COUNTY. FLORIDA
-------
top). This unit ranges from 0 to 15 feet thick, thinning to the
southeast.
The Oligocene-age Marianna Limestone is a white to cream to light
gray, slightly glauconitic, fossiliferous (foraminifera and bryozoa),
massive, impermeable limestone. This unit is fairly uniform in thick-
ness, varying between 25 and 40 feet.
The Oligocene-age Suwanee Limestone in Jackson County consists of
tan to buff limestones, dolomitic limestones, and dolomitic to cal-
careous clays. This unit was subjected to erosion before deposition
of Miocene-age sediments began, and ranges from 210 feet to 512 feet
thick in the central part of the county near Marianna and Cottondale.
The Miocene-age Tampa Formation in Jackson County is strati -
graphically equivalent to the Tampa Limestone, but primarily consists
of white, gray, and green clays and clayey marls. The formation is
more calcareous in the southeastern part of Jackson County and more
argillaceous to the west and northwest; however, the entire formation
is characterized by the presence of fine, scattered quartz grains.
The unit is thickest in the southeastern and southwestern parts of
Jackson County (approximately 50 to 100 feet and 100 to 170 feet,
respectively), but thins to the north, pinching out just south of the
Sapp Battery site (Figure 1-5).
The post-Miocene sediments of Jackson County, which include a
number of stream terrace deposits, consist of cross-bedded clays,
sandy clays, clayey sands, sands, and gravels that change laterally
and vertically within short distances. Several reports (e.g., Cooke
1945 and Watts 1984) have identified the sediments underlying the
stream terrace deposits as the Pliocene-age Citronelle Formation.
However, Moore (1955) and Vernon and Puri (1964) suggest that making
this differentiation could be difficult because the stream terrace
deposits and the Citronelle Formation are similar in color and com-
position. The post-Miocene deposits in Jackson County can attain
thicknesses greater than 100 feet, especially in areas where these
sediments have filled fractures or cavities in the underlying lime-
stone.
1.2.1 General Geologic Structure
The rock units in Jackson County dip southeast, south, and south-
west as a result of a broad flexure to the north (along the Florida,
1-15
recycled paper rr»l and rnvimnnirm
-------
Georgia, and Alabama borders). This flexure is commonly known as the.
Chattahoochee Anticline. Moore (1955) suggests the presence of an
Oligocene to Miocene-age flexure to the south, which is believed to
have caused the jointing and fracturing of the limestone bedrock in
this area. As a result of this broad structural influence, the joints
and fractures in these soft limestone units have been weathered sub-
stantially to a point of creating a karstic terrain. This karst
characteristic in the Jackson County area is very evident when
regional topographic maps are examined. For instance, as displayed in
Figure 1-1, karstic features such as sinkholes and hummocks are com-
mon.
The karst characteristics are also common at a more localized
scale such as that of the Sapp Battery site. These features were
determined at the site by FDER in a fracture trace analysis based on
aerial photographs. Several lineaments and sinkholes were mapped on
tie site from this study (Figure 1-6). FDER concluded that at least
ii sinkholes exist in the site vicinity. Two of these sinkholes were
confirmed by E & E's deep drilling in the Northwest Landfill area
(MW-9A) and near the former Sapp residence (MW-12A).
1.2.2 Regional Soil Conditions
The U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil Survey of Jackson County
identified four soil associations in the vicinity of the Sapp Battery
site. The Dorovan-Pamlico association was recorded in the swampy
areas of the site and is characterized as mainly black muck with a
lower horizon of dark grayish-brown sand. The Fuquay Coarse Sand
association was recorded as occurring in the area of the site where
the battery cutting operation was located, and is characterized as a
mixture of brown coarse sand and yellow brown sandy loam to a depth of
approximately 5 feet. The Grady Fine Sandy Loam and the Dothan Loamy
Sand associations were identified as possibly being present in small
areas to the west and north of the site, respectively. Neither of
these two latter soil associations differs significantly from the
Fuquay Coarse Sand in its chemical or physical properties. However,
the extensive earth-moving activities that occurred at the Sapp Bat-
tery site in the 1970s and more recently raises doubts as to how
1-16
-------
LEGEND-
Fraciur* Lin«»llur\
SOUHCt FDtH, 1984
[ | Sinl
ikhol*
!>O 2OO
0 1O bO
f*i*-.'mm. rm<
SCALE
4QQ 60O SOOr-EET
2OOMKTERS
1OO
16O
Figure 1 -6 FRACTURE LINEATIONS AND SINKHOLE LOCATIONS
-------
accurately this survey represents current soil conditions at the site.
Site soil conditions based on actual field boring results are provided
in Section 3.2 of this report.
1-18
-------
1.3 SURFACE WATER HYDROLOGY
Surface runoff at the site flows to the several swamps located on
and immediately adjacent to the site. The highest elevation on the
western portion of the property is at the approximate mid-point of the
west property line, where the truck weigh scale foundation is located.
From this high point, surface runoff is somewhat radial. The area
between the plant foundation and the most southern extent of the
Northwest Landfill drains to the Northwest Swamp. Areas east and
northeast of the site drain via many small rills to the West Swamp.
The area south of the plant foundation is presently covered by a
plastic liner which prevents infiltration of rainfall and runoff. It
drains and concentrates runoff to the southeast, where dikes direct
the water through the limestone rip-rap drain and into the southern
end of the West Swamp.
All areas on-site and southwest of the plastic liner drain to the
south or southeast and eventually to the road ditch along County Road
280. At several points where runoff spills through the fence and into
the road ditch south of the West Swamp, sediments have been washed
away, revealing battery chips at least 1 foot thick.
The Northwest Landfill area is nearly level, with runoff being
ponded locally in several areas.
Surface drainage from the northern areas east of the Northwest
Landfill flows toward the East Swamp. There is an area east of the
Northwest Landfill where clay was scraped and used to construct berms,
to fill in the acid pond, and as a base for the plastic liner south of
the plant foundation. Runoff in this northern area is confined to the
large shallow depression created by this operation.
There is an area 1n the southeast quadrant of the site which is
low in elevation and is bordered on three sides by the dike east of
the West Swamp, the East Swamp, and the Southeast Swamp. Under high
water conditions, this open area floods, and water discharges through
a cut in the dike into the Southeast Swamp. This discharge was
observed several times after rainfall events during the November/
December fieldwork and again in January by a survey party. Under
normal precipitation conditions and periods of slightly raised water
table, ponding and marshy conditions occur over much of the area.
1-19
recycled paper «-,,l«g» ami nmn.nnirm
-------
There has not been a surface water connection between the West
Swamp.and Steele City Bay since 1980, when drainage from the West
Swamp to the culvert under County Road 280 was filled and a berm con-
structed. The Southeast Swamp remains connected to Steele City Bay by
a culvert under County Road 280.
Steele City Bay and several wetlands to the east make up a system
of interconnected surface water bodies which contribute a relatively
low amount of discharge to Little Dry Creek, about 1 mile south-
southeast of the Sapp Battery site. Observations made in November
1985, during sediment sampling, indicated that direct surface drainage
from this wetland system to Little Dry Creek does not occur under
drier conditions.
On November 11, 1985, 10 days after the last rains of Hurricane
Juan, the observed rate of discharge through the relatively narrow
channel into Little Dry Creek was approximately 1 to 3 cubic feet per
second (cfs).
1-20
-------
1.4 HYDROGEOLOGY
the groundwater system at the site consists of a complex sequence
of anisotropic, heterogeneous aquifers and aquitards. This complexity
reflects the karstic nature of the relatively deep subsurface lime-
stones and the depositional history of the overlying unconsolidated
sediments.
In general, there are three aquifer systems in the vicinity of
the Sapp Battery site: the confined Floridan aquifer system; the
overlying semi-confined intermediate aquifer system; and the shallow,
unconfined surficial aquifer system. In addition, possibly two or
three more localized semi-confined hydrostratigraphic units occur
within the intermediate deposits.
The shallow surficial aquifer system in this area of Jackson
County lies within Pliocene-age sands and clays and Holocene to
Pleistocene-age undifferentiated marine, fluvial, and terrace mate-
rials. In general, this aquifer system is present to a depth of 10
to 30 feet below land surface, and is confined below by the upper
impermeable clayey layers of the intermediate aquifer system. The
potentiometric surface of the surficial aquifer system in this area
has a hydraulic gradient to the south-southeast and for the most part
is a reflection of topographic conditions. This aquifer is in direct
communication with the surrounding cypress swamps; hence, water levels
are commonly very near or at land surface in low-lying areas. As a
result of the low permeability of the sandy clays and clayey sands
that comprise the surficial aquifer system, reported well yields are
generally less than 5 gallons per minute (gpm) (Watts 1984).
The semi-confined intermediate aquifer system lies within the
Pliocene and Miocene-age clays, sandy clays, and clayey sand
sequences, which exhibit great variability with respect to texture and
continuity. This aquifer system ranges in thickness from 30 to
greater than 100 feet. The great variability of the intermediate
aquifer reflects the undulating surface of the underlying limestone as
well as the presence of filled-in sinkholes. The intermediate aquifer
system exhibits multiple potentiometric surfaces, which are most
likely the result of semi-confined perched units being locally present
at different elevations throughout its thickness. However, a more
1-21
recycled paper (.).(>lor and rattninmfnt
-------
uniform potentiometric surface, with a hydraulic gradient to the west-
southwest, is defined by wells screened generally 30-feet below land
surface. Locally, paleo-stream channels have dissected the upper con-
fining units of the intermediate aquifer system, thereby creating a
direct connection between this system and the overlying surficial
aquifer system. The more impermeable units present in the lower por-
tion of the intermediate aquifer system effectively confine the
Floridan aquifer system except where it 1s breached by sinkholes.
Rural and domestic supply wells open to the intermediate aquifer sys-
tem generally have been reported to have yields of less than 10 gpm
(Watts 1984).
On a regional scale, the Floridan aquifer system lies within
Oligocene and Eocene-age limestones and dolomites. However, in Jack-
son County the Eocene-age limestones of the Ocala Group make up the
primary storage unit for this artesian system. In the vicinity of the
Sapp Battery site, the Floridan aquifer system is believed to be 400
to 600 feet thick, with well yields in excess of 1,000 gpm (Franks
1982). The reported regional hydraulic gradient for the Floridan
aquifer system in this area is generally-to the east (U.S. Geological
Survey 1982).
The hydrology and chemistry of each of the three aquifer systems
are discussed in greater detail in Section 3.4.
1-22
-------
1.5 REGIONAL SURFACE WATER, SURFACE WATER SEDIMENT, AND BIOLOGICAL
EFFECTS
Dr. D. J. Livingston, Florida State University (FSU), with a
grant from EPA., began research at Sapp Battery Plant in May 1983. The
main thrust of his research dealt with determining the validity of
bioassays as predictors of conditions in the field. However, he also
drew conclusions regarding conditions of surface water, sediments, and
biota at the site and downgradient from it. All of Dr. Livingston's
studies dealt with community parameters. No tissue analyses were per-
formed on any organisms.
A series of 14 sampling stations was established, beginning on
the site and progressing down Little Dry Creek and Dry Creek to the
Chipola River Confluence (Figure 1-7). Sampling began in May 1983 and
was concluded in May 1985. After June 1984, the majority of sample
types were collected on a quarterly basis. After September 1983, no
samples were collected from Station 9 and 10. The following discus-
sion is a summary of the Livingston (1985) sampling results.
1.5.1 Surface Water and Sediment
Surface water and sediment samples were taken quarterly and
analyzed for heavy metals. Surface waters were collected as grab
samples and sediment samples were taken from the top 2 cm of a 10-cm
core sample. Parameters analyzed for were nickel, chromium, zinc,
manganese, iron, copper, lead, aluminum, and cadmium. A preliminary
scan of sediment and water samples by Proton Induced X-Ray Emission
(PIXE) and convention atomic absorbtion emission spectroscopy showed
these metals at detectable levels. No other chemical analyses were
conducted on these samples. The primary metals of concern in the FSU
study were lead and aluminum. Of the seven remaining, cadmium,
chromium, copper, iron, and nickel were found in concentrations only
slightly above background levels observed at control sites, whereas
zinc and manganese seemed to be evenly distributed throughout the
system. The following discussion concerns lead, aluminum, and cad-
mium. Cadmium is included because it is considered a contaminant of
concern for surface waters in the risk assessment.
The highest lead levels in surface waters were found at stations
1 and 2 in August 1983 at concentrations of 36 and 11.25 ppm,
1-23
recycled paper «•,,!«»> ami m>in.nmrni
-------
I
ro
SOURCE Motlili««l tiom LiviO'lilQ"
Figure 1-7 CHIPOLA RIVER PROJECT STUDY AREA AND SAMPLE LOCATIONS
-------
respectively. After that time, lead concentrations began to taper off
at these stations except in April 5, 1985, at station 1, which showed
nearly a seven-fold increase.
Aluminum in surface waters showed relatively high values at sta-
tions 1, 2, and 2A during December 1985 (4.5 to 5.2 ppm); January 1985
(3.7 to 22.7 ppm); and April 1985 (2.1 to 6.6 ppm). In general, the
lowest levels of aluminum were found during summer months. Generally,
the stations exhibiting higher lead and aluminum values in the water
also exhibited lower pH values, relative to other stations.
Cadmium in the surface water stations was essentially not
detected during the two sampling episodes in 1984, except for 0.02 and
0.09 ppm in stations 2A and 8, respectively, in the July 1984
sampling. However, cadmium was detected at very low concentrations at
the majority of stations sampled in 1985, with station 2 exhibiting
the highest value, 0.04 ppm.
Lead concentrations in sediment samples collected at stations 1,
2, and 2A were consistently one to two orders of magnitude higher than
levels from any of the other stations during any of the sampling
events. Lead levels from late 1983 to early 1985 ranged from 184 to
1935 ppm (station 1), 20.5 to 999.5 ppm (station 2), and 16.8 to 47.0
ppm (station 2A). The higher concentrations typically occurred from
1983 to 1984. Lower levels were detected more recently.
Aluminum concentrations in the sediment samples generally fol-
lowed the lead trends, with the highest concentrations also at sta-
tions 1, 2, and 2A, with values ranging from: 8,799 to 24,565 ppm;
7,465 to 18,010 ppm; and 1,330 to 18,200 ppm, respectively, during
sampling episodes in 1984 to 1985. As with lead, the increased alumi-
num values were detected early in the study and decreased in late
1984.
Cadmium in sediment showed the same general trend as lead and
aluminum, with the highest concentration at stations 1, 2, and 2A,
ranging from: 0.04 to 1.74 ppm; 0.10 to 2.81_ppm; and 0.03 to 0.13
ppm, respectively, throughout the sampling episodes. As with the
other two metals, higher values were detected early in the investiga-
tion (1983) and lower values at the end (1985).
1-25
recycled paper rollout anil rmminntrru
-------
A general summary of the FSU study of lead, aluminum, cadmium,
and pH results for surface water and sediments are summarized in
Tables 1-1, 1-2, and 1-3.
1.5.2 Algae Samples
In the FSU investigation, algal samples were collected qualita-
tively by hand and with 5-liter containers. These collections were
made to generate species lists at each station. Quantitative samples
were obtained using diatometers and phytoplankton nets. Samples were
taken quarterly at stations 1, 2A, 6, and 7.
Samples obtained using diatometers exhibited the lowest number of
individuals at station 1 and the highest numbers at station 2A. The
lowest number of species generally occurred at station 1, while the
highest was at station 6. No pattern of species diversity or species
richness was observed.
Concerning samples taken with the phytoplankton nets, no patterns
of species diversity or evenness were noted. The lowest numbers of
individuals were noted at station 1. Species richness was highest at
stations 6 and 7 (Tables 1-4 and 1-5).
1.5.3 Macroinvertebrates
Infaunal and epibenthic macroinvertebrates were collected quali-
tatively in sediment core samples and in leaf packs (artificial sub-
strates set out in the stream) during the FSU investigation. Qualita-
tive samples using nets were also taken to aid in creating a species
list.
A gradient response to the distribution of heavy metals and low
pH in the Little Dry Creek and Dry Creek system was exhibited by
infaunal macroinvertebrates (animals found living in the sediments).
Seasonal variations were noted; however, an overall pattern of lower
species richness, diversity, and evenness associated with higher metal
concentrations and lower pH values are exhibited. It should be noted
that numbers of individuals varied greatly among the stations.
Numerical abundance at some of the most contaminated stations was
attributed to proliferation of a very few resistant species.
1-26
-------
Table 1-1
LEAD, ALUMINUM, AND CADMIUM CONCENTRATIONS IN
STUMP CREEK, LITTLE DRY CREEK, AND DRY CREEK
SURFACE WATERS DOWNGRADIENT OF THE SAPP BATTERY SITE
LEAD (PPM)
Station
Date 6 5 11
July 31, 1984 <.01 -- <.01
October 31, 1984 <.01 —
January 29, 1985 .10
April 5, 1985 .10 —
4 1
<.01 4.55
.64
.41
.10 2.86
2 2A 3
80 .23 —
25 .01 --
58 .12 —
29 .10 --
4A 48 7 8
<.01 <.01 <.01 <.01
<.01 <.01 <.01 <.01
.10 .10 .10 .10
.10 .10 .10 .10
ALUMINUM (PPM)
Station
Date 6 5 11
July 31, 1984 <.05 -- 1.30
October 31, 1984 .03 --
January 29, 1985 .50
April 5, 1985 .50 --
4 1
3.36 1.12 1.
.43 12.
.68 22.
.80 3.67 6.
2 2A 3
51 1.70 --
52 1.18 —
70 3.70 —
60 2.10 —
4A 48 7 8
1.90 2.70 .54 .58
1.10 .60 .42 .41
.51 .61 .50 .50
.65 .53 .50 .50
CADMIUM (PPM)
Station
Date 6 5 11
July 31, 1984 <.02 — <.02
October 31, 1984 <.02 —
January 29, 1985 .01
April 5, 1985 .01
4 1
<.02 .02 <.
— <.02 <.
.01
.01 .01
2 2A 3
02 .02 —
02 <.02 —
01 .01 --
04 .01 —
4A 48 7 8
<.02 <.02 <.02 .09
<.02 <.02 <.02 <.02
.01 .01 .01 .01
.01 .01 .01 .01
Notes;
-- Indicates not sampled
Station 11 was usually dry
Sampling at Nations 3 and 5 was discontinued in October 1983
Stations 2A, 4A and 48 Mere added in May 1984
Source: Livingston 1985
1-27
recycled paper
anil rimmnmrm
-------
Table 1-2
LEAD, ALUMINUM, AND CADMIUM CONCENTRATIONS IN
STUMP CREEK, LITTLE DRY CREEK, AND DRV CREEK
SEDIMENTS DOWNGRADIENT OF THE SAPP BATTERY SITE
LEAD (PPM)
Station
Date 6 5
August 1983 — 2.6
September 27, 1983 <.05 12.0
July 31, 1984 1.48 --
November 5, 1984 .97
January 29, 1985 1.23 —
April 5, 1985 2.22 —
11 4 1
3.10 1935.0
.56 184.0
1.92 323.5
2.11 208.0
454.0
5.04 252.25
2
999.5
51.6
163.3
218.67
73.19
20.5
2A 3 4A 4B 7 8
— 17.5
1.20 1.61
28.5 -- 2.10 3.84 2.69 15.05
16.8 -- .97 3.23 2.63 22.9
47.0 — 1.32 1.83 3.30 2.72
36.3 -- 8.60 2.87 3.11 10.79
9 10
— — — —
2.18 0.79
—
—
—
—
ALUMINUM (PPM)
Station
Date 6 5
August 1983 — .0
September 27, 1983 .0 .0
July 31, 1984 2950.0
November 5, 1984 1830.0
January 29, 1985 1772.0
April 5, 1985 1552.67
11 4 1
.00
.00 .00
4090.00 1900.0 21950.0
1640.0 9575.0
24565.0
3740.0 8799.25
2
.00
.00
15166.67
8533.33
18010.0
7465.0
2A 3 4A 4B 7 8
.00
.00 .00
18200.0 — 3430.0 3100.0 5200.0 2480.00
1330.0 — 1200.0 2400.0 2590.0 1230.0
12680.0 1517.0 2864.0 8530.0 3746.0
8204.0 — 5714.0 1829.0 2087.0 1012.0
9 10
__ __
.00 .00
__
—
—
--
-------
s
s
s
Table 1-2 (Cont.)
i
ro
CADMIUM (PPM)
Station
Date
August 1983
September 27, 1983 <2
July 31, 1984 <
November 5, 1984 <
January 29, 1985
April 5, 1985
Notes:
— Indicates not saapled
Station 11 was usual 1
Sampling at Stations
6 5 '1 * 1 2 2A 3 4A 4B 7 8 9 10
<-90 — <.90 1.74 2.81 — .84 — — — — -_
.5 2.31 <.25 <.25 1.02 1.44 - - - - .61 2.05 <.25 1.07
.02 -- <.02 <.02 .06 .38 <.02 — <.02 <.02 <.02 <.02 —
•02 — — <-02 .04 .47 .03 — <.02 <.02 <.02 <.02 —
•OJ — — — .19 .31 .13 - .02 .05 .05 .04 -
•04 — — .07 .73 .10 .12 -- .12 .05 .05 .04 —
y dry
3 and 5 MBS discontinued in October 1983
Stations 2A, 4A and 4B Mere added in Hay 1984
Source: Livingston 1985
-------
Table 1-3
PH VALUES FOR STUMP CREEK, LITTLE DRY CREEK, AND DRY CREEK
SURFACE WATER DOWNGRADIENT OF THE SAPP BATTERY SITE
Station
Date 6 5 11 4 1 22A 3 4A 48 7 8
Auguat 1983 5.50 5.7 5.5 5.9 3.4 2.9 5.5 5
September 27, 1983 5.1 6.1 6.5 5.3 3.8 3.4 5 4.7
July 10, 1984 4 — 3.5 3.4 2.6 2.8 2.8 — 3.8 3.7 3.7 4
October 19, 1984 5.3 — -- 5.7 3.3 3.4 3.4 — 5.5 5.4 5.1 5.2
February 4, 1985 4.2 — 3.9 4.5 3.2 3.2 3.2 — 6.4 5.8 5.2 5.5
April 1, 1985 5.2 — 4.7 4.7 3.5 3.4 3.4 -- 5.4 5.4 5.4 4.9
Source: Livingston 1985
1-30
-------
Table 1-4
COMMUNITY INDICES OF ALGAE TAKEN WITH OIATOMETERS AT
FOUR STATIONS IN THE LITTLE DRY CREEK-DRY CREEK SYSTEM
(quarterly, 1984-1985)
Station
Date
Number of
07/26/84
10/29/84
01/29/85
04/05/85
Number of
07/26/84
10/29/84
01/29/85
04/05/85
01
06
07
2A
individuals per mm2 per slide
688.00
403.00
702.00
1,621.00
speciee
14.00
9.00
29.00
7.00
736.00
518.00
317.00
1,891.00
24.00
21.00
28.00
23.00
1,430.00
337.00
489.00
2,222.00
15.00
10.00
19.00
10.00
2,869.00
2,179.00
1,674.00
4,726.00
25.00
8.00
18.00
13.00
Source* Livingston 1985
1-31
recvc!ed paper
-------
Table 1-5
NET PLANKTON
(numbers/in5 x 0.0001)
TAKEN IN THE LITTLE DRY
CREEK-DRY CREEK SYSTEM
Station
Date
Number of
07/26/84
10/29/84
01/29/85
04/05/85
Number of
07/26/84
10/29/84
01/29/85
04/05/85
01
Individuals
2,554.35
3,217.58
17,941.60
31,391.49
Species
19.00
11.00
13.00
17.00
06
per w3
7,830.48
12,003.70
48,024.38
29,077.64
11.00
36.00
38.00
22.00
07
4,315.38
8,317.11
48,984.53
35,176.28
15.00
25.00
32.00
21.00
2A
8,661.25
16,341.11
15,069.93
61,971.38
9.00
15.00
13.00
14.00
Source: Livingston 1985
1-32
-------
Epibenthic macroinvertebrates (organisms living on the sediment
surface or slightly above it) exhibited a similar pattern. Seasonal
variations were noted.
1.5.4 Fishes
Fish were collected qualitatively by using an electrofisher. No
fish were observed in the most highly contaminated areas (stations 1
and 2). Recovery of species richness and numbers of individuals was
noted between station 48 and station 7. Thi.s pattern follows the
gradient exhibited by other types of organisms as well as the gradient
of contamination (heavy metals and pH).
Livingston concluded that altered species dominance and a
decrease in numbers of individuals and species of periphyton (algae
collected in diatometers) as well as net algae, was due to water
quality changes in the immediate vicinity of the Sapp Battery site.
Also attributed to altered water quality were diminished species rich-
ness, diversity, and evenness of infaunal macroinvertebrates and the
complete loss of fish fauna. A distinct biological response was
observed along the gradient of contamination. This was made obvious
by change in the development of the algal community, the establishment
of resident invertebrates populations, and the loss of fish fauna.
1.5.5 Heavy Metals Task Force Investigation
The Heavy Metals Task Force conducted several studies in the
vicinity of the Sapp Battery Site. These included studies on the
Chipola River, including areas potentially affected by the United
Metals plant. These investigations were conducted to determine the
contribution of heavy metal contamination in water, sediment, and bio-
logical samples from the Sapp Battery site and/or the United Metals
plant.
In August 1982, FDER conducted a study on water and sediment
quality on the Chipola River in the vicinity of the United Metals
plant. There was also a sample station (station 14) on Dry Creek,
which is the predominant drainage from the direction of Sapp Battery.
Water analyzed from station 14 revealed no values for lead or cadmium
above detection limits. Manganese was detected at 50 ug/1. This
value is much lower than the 630 ppb level analyzed for at station 12,
. 1-33
rri»l«*K* unit rimnmiiH'Mi
-------
which is farther upstream on the Chipola River. Sediment samples from
station 14 exhibited 4.2 mg/kg lead and 0.6 mg/kg cadmium (see Figure
1-8). In comparison, a slightly higher lead value of 6.5 mg/kg was
detected at station 13, situated on the Chipola River above the Dry
Creek-Chipola River confluence. Aluminum was not an analytical param-
eter in this study (FDER February 1983).
A subsequent study was initiated in March 1983 as a result of
findings reported in September 1982 by the Florida Game and Fresh-
water Commission of high cadmium levels and other metals in whole fin-
fish (largemouth bass, spotted sucker) samples collected in the
Apalachicola Basin. Freshwater clam (corbicula sp.) samples were also
collected and analyzed for metals. Lead was an order of magnitude
higher in the spotted sucker (0.450 mg/kg), as compared to the large-
mouth bass (0.130 mg/kg) at station 4. Lead values at the remaining
stations for both fish exhibited comparable levels both up- and down-
stream from station 4, with peaks occurring farther downstream in both
samples. These downstream values were again higher for the spotted
sucker (1.54 mg/kg at station 7) versus the largemouth bass (1.19
mg/kg at station 8). This is due to the fact that suckers feed on
benthic organisms and often strain bottom mud in the process. These
muds are sinks for heavy metals in aqueous systems. Thus, ingestion
of these nutriment fractions would lead to higher tissue metals levels
in the sucker versus the bass, which are primarily nektonic carni-
vores, feeding mainly on small fish. Cadmium values for both fish
were below detection limits for the majority of stations. The greater
majority of bass samples were below the detection limit of 0.400 ppm.
Three stations, 9 (0.406 ppm), 7 (.475 ppm), and 3 (0.440 ppm),
exhibited elevated levels. All except one of the sucker samples (from
station 7, 0.426 ppm) were below 0.400 ppm (see Figure 1-9). The
corbicula clam samples provided a more comprehensive picture of
cadmium distribution along the Chipola River. These organisms strain
benthic mud for food and ingest mud in the process. As a result, bio-
concentration of heavy metals is more easily facilitated in tissue.
The highest value was again evident at station 7 (0.548 ppm), while
the second and third highest values occurred at stations 2 (0.519 ppm)
and 1 (0.488 ppm). From this wide range it can be concluded that
cadmium is generally distributed throughout the main stem of the
1-34
-------
SCALE
3MILES
••KILOMETERS
Figure 1-8 CHIPOLA RIVER SAMPLING STATION
LOCATIONS
1-35
-------
I ALABAMA
H/O 0 S > 0 N
/Kambo /
u»-m± ^•••••^••••MMMiAaaH
.jSSiH*Mift=iu*
10
SCALE
20 30
4O
50MILES
10
20
30
40
50
00
70KILOMETERS
Figure 1-9 CLAMS AND FISH IN CHIPOLA RIVER FGFC/USFWS
SAMPLING STATIONS
1-36
-------
4J J1A CIKvS O N
>x ' i I J>k D«llwaad
rvs. • i «• j *-i v« i i »x »* \^ | (i
7^r> L-. i L**^\ D«llwooa°(~7
^tt STATE ^
-------
Chippla River and probably exists in small indiscrete point sources
(FDER, March 1983). Since no trend of metal concentration existed as
a function of station location, a connection with Sapp Battery could
not be established.
During the period 1983 through 1985, a variety of fishes were
taken from five stations on the Chipola and Apalachicola rivers (see
Figure 1-10). Fillets were analyzed for lead, mercury, and cadmium.
Statistical values indicated an increase of lead and cadmium in
suckers versus bass, and a general increase in year-class metal levels
for the aforementioned rivers. On a further 1985 Chipola River study,
a mean comparison for lead exhibited similar trends. Additionally, a
slight gradient existed for lead up- and downgradient from the Dry
Creek-Chipola River confluence. Lower concentrations existed upriver
from the confluence at station 1, while higher levels existed at the
confluence, near stations 2 and 2a. Mean and standard deviation
values at station 2a (up Dry Creek) indicated lower levels of lead
than at station 2 (Department of Interior 1985). Thus, contamination
from the Sapp Battery site may be a contributing factor to increased
levels of lead and cadmium in Chipola River fish. However, evidence
is not sufficient to indicate the Sapp site as the primary source of
contamination.
1-38
-------
2. FIELDWORK
2.1 PRIORITY POLLUTANT CONFIRMATION STUDY
Prior to beginning the major portion of the fieldwork, a limited
number of samples was collected and analyzed for priority pollutants
(i.e., purgeable organics, acid base/neutral extractable organics,
pesticides, total metals, cyanide, and sulfates). The purpose of this
limited sampling was to confirm the analytical parameters for the main
investigation. Soil and sediment sample locations are listed in Table
2-1; surface water and groundwater sample locations are listed in
Table 2-2. All sampling locations are shown on Figure 2-1.
For background purposes, soil, sediment, groundwater, and surface
water samples were collected from areas which were likely to be
unaffected by contamination from the Sapp Battery site, off-site and
to the west. The background soil sample was collected in the south-
central portion of an open pasture adjoining the site to the west
(Jackie Farren's property); the background sediment and surface water
samples were taken from the west Steele City Bay area; and the back-
ground groundwater sample was collected from an assumed upgradient
residential well owned by Mr. Emmett Roark. These background samples
were collected prior to the on-site fieldwork.
In order to qualitatively represent site contamination, four
soil samples, four sediment samples, four groundwater samples, and
three surface water samples were collected on-site. The soil samples
were collected in the Northwest Landfill area and the west bank of the
West Swamp. The sediment samples were taken from the Northwest Swamp,
West Swamp, East Swamp, and Southeast Swamp. The soil and sediment
2-1
-------
Table 2-1
SOIL/SEDIMENT SAMPLES COLLECTED FOR THE
PRIORITY POLLUTANT CONFIRMATION STUDY
Sample/
Location Number
Location/Description
Soils
FSY01
FSG23P
FSG54P
FSA06P
FSA09P and
DSA09P (duplicate)
S8B01
FSR01
Sediments
FMH16
FMH17
FMH18
FMH19
FMH20
Pasture west of site, 5-foot boring composite
(background)
Northwest landfill, on-site grid station 23,
5-foot boring composite
Northwest landfill, on-site grid station 54,
5-foot boring composite
West bank of West Swamp, station 06, 5-foot
boring composite
West bank of West Swamp, station 09, 5-foot
boring composite
Soil/sediment sample jar (8-ounce) trip bottle
blank
Soil sampling equipment field rinsate sample
West Steele City Bay, southwest of site, 5-foot
boring composite (background)
West Swamp, 5-foot boring composite
East Swamp, 5-foot boring composite
Southeast Swamp, 5-foot boring composite
Northwest Swamp, 2.5-foot boring composite
2-2
-------
Table 2-2
SURFACE WATER/GROUNOWATER SAMPLES COLLECTED
FOR THE PRIORITY POLLUTANT CONFIRMATION STUDY
Sample/
Location Number
Location/Description
Surface Water
FSW01
FSW02 and
DSW02 (duplicate)
FSW03
FSW04
Meat Steele City Bay, southwest of site (back-
ground)
West Swamp
Southeast Swamp
Steele City Bay, west of culvert under railroad
tracks
Groundwater
FEW03A
FEW038B
FEW03C
FEW09C
FRW01
GWB01
GNR01
Monitoring well MW-03A
Monitoring well MW-03BB
Monitoring well MW-03C
Monitoring well MW-09C
Residential well (Emmett Roark residence),
southwest of site
Water sample trip bottle blanks (1/2 gallon,
1 liter, 40 ml)
Monitoring well sampling equipment field
rinsate sample
2-3
>M>i.V it,III fit
-------
ro
i
ZIJ^
5
FORMER SAPP
RESIDENCE
BACKGROUND1
GROUNDWATEll
TAKEN FROM I
EMMETT ROARKI
WELL
/
A
FSY 01
BACKGROUND I
SOIL
l._
FMH 16, BACKGROUND SEDIMENT 4NO"ly «<>•<< 280
FSW 01, BACKGROUND SURFACE WATER
^ -FSWe^-r ~^ If
DOWNGHAblBMT/aURFACi-XXTER \ ||
O
O
— LEGEND -
Soil Boring
Sediment. 0-5'
Composite
Ground water
Surface Water
0 50
200
SCALE
400
600
800 FEET
0 1O
SO
too
150
200 METERS
Figure 2-1 PRIORITY POLLUTANT CONFIRMATION STUDY SAMPLE LOCATIONS
-------
samples were collected using a modified hand augering technique and
composited over a 0- to 5-foot depth interval.
The groundwater samples were collected from existing wells
MW-03A, MW-03BB, MW-03C, and MW-09C. These samples were obtained
using a polyvinyl chloride (PVC) bailer after three well volumes of
water had been purged from each well.
Sampling techniques are discussed in detail in Sections 2.2, 2.3,
and 2.4 for soil, sediment, and groundwater, respectively.
The three surface water samples were collected near the west bank
of the West Swamp, the west bank of the East Swamp, and in Steele City
Bay, west of the culvert under the railroad tracks. These samples
were obtained by submerging the sample container under the water until
the container was full. Conductivity, pH, and temperature were mea-
sured at all surface water and groundwater sampling locations.
Duplicate samples (approximately 10% of the total number of sam-
ples), sampling equipment rinsates, and trip bottle blank samples were
collected for QA/QC purposes (see Section 4). All parameters for
solids and water were analyzed at the detection limits specified in
the QAPP, except where matrix effects or high concentrations limited
the volume used for analysis, or required dilution or changing the
detection limit to "best achievable." As requested by FDER, complete
data packages were compiled for 12 of these samples in accordance with
standard EPA procedures. The analytical results of this initial con-
firmation study are discussed in Section 3.1.
2-5
•r; .ciecj
-------
2.2 SOIL SAMPLING/FIXATION STUDY
2.2.1 Soil Sampling
Soil samples were collected from a total of 89 locations: sur-
face composite samples at 18 locations; eight 5-foot borings; 61 10-
foot borings; and two 15-foot borings (see Table 2-3). The samples
were analyzed for either pH, lead, and percent moisture, or pH, lead,
cadmium, antimony, and percent moisture. Analytical results for the
soil samples are discussed in Section 3.2.
All subsurface soil samples were collected using some type of
boring equipment, either a 4-inch solid stem auger, 4-inch bucket
auger, or 2-inch split-spoon. All of the boring equipment was con-
structed from hardened steel, with the exception of one of the bucket
augers, which was constructed from stainless steel. Most of the sam-
ples were obtained using disposable plastic spoons and homogenized in
plastic zip-lock storage bags before being placed into 8-ounce sample
jars. Plastic spoons were used to reduce the potential for outside
metals to contaminate the soil sample. In several instances, however,
a stainless steel spoon was used to collect a sample where extremely
dense clays were encountered and plastic spoons were not practical.
As shown on Figure 2-2, a total of 18 surface soil composite
sampling locations were established: 13 in the southeastern portion
of the site (three of which--FSS16, 17, and 18--were located in the
area of the former Sapp Battery facility), four in the northern por-
tion of the site, and one in the southwest corner of the site. Each
sample was collected as a composite of five aliquots from a 25-foot-
diameter area. Each aliquot was collected from a depth of 0 to 0.5
foot, using a plastic spoon, and the total sample was homogenized in a
plastic zip-lock storage bag before being placed into the appropriate
sample container. Spoons and bags were discarded after each sample.
Fifteen of the 18 samples were analyzed for pH, lead, and percent
moisture. The remaining three samples, taken from the area of the
former facility, were analyzed for pH, lead, cadmium, antimony, and
percent moisture.
There were certain procedures common to all of the soil borings
conducted on the site. Observations made of lithology (soil/sediment
2-6
-------
Table 2-3
ORGANIZATION OF COLLECTED SOIL SAMPLES
Prefix
Code
FSA-
FS8-
FSC-
FSE-
FSG-
Oeacription
10-foot borings conducted
along the Meat bank of the
West Swamp
10-foot boringa conducted
along the south side of the
southwest ben*
10-foot boringa conducted
through the concrete foundation
of the Sapp Battery plant
3-foot boringa conducted along
the eaat bank of the Nest
Swamp
10-foot boringa conducted in
Total
Locations
13
6
2
8
40
Total
Samples.
Analyzed'
72
20
7
27
130
Total
Samples
Archived
0
12
4
0
80
Archived
Samples
Analyzed
0
6
0
0
48
a grid pattern north of the
plant
FSL- 15-foot boringa conducted in
the Northwest Landfill
FSS- Surface soil composite sample
locations
3»
18
3
19
Key;
1. Totals given include duplicate samples collected (OS*-).
•One location did not involve sampling (exploration only).
Note; Samples collected for Priority Pollutant Confirmation Study not included.
2-7
-------
ro
I
00
FORMER SAW
I II RESIDENCE
I
LEGEND
0 SO
200
SCALE
4OO 60O
800 FEET
0 1O
50
100
ISO
2OO METERS
Figure 2-2 SURFACE COMPOSITE SAMPLE LOCATIONS (FSS)
Surface Composite
Sample Analytis
lor pH. Pb. Cd. Sb.
and % Moi.lur*
Surface Composite
Sample Analysis
for pH. Pb. and
% Moitiura
-------
characteristics, depth of battery chip/casings fill, and depth to
water'table, when possible) were recorded at each hole. Upon comple-
tion of each boring, the boreholes were grouted to the surface with
Portland cement. There were a few instances where cave-ins prevented
grouting of the entire hole.
There were enough 4-inch-diameter solid stem auger flights to
complete 10 boreholes before decontamination was necessary. After
completing 10 borings, all of the auger stems were pressure-washed,
scrubbed with trisodium phosphate and water, rinsed with tap water,
and then rinsed with distilled water. In contrast, both auger bits
were needed for each boring, and these were decontaminated between
boreholes. The two solid stem auger bits used for the borings were
decontaminated after each boring by scrubbing in trisodium phosphate,
using non-metallic brushes. Toothbrushes were used to clean between
auger teeth. The bits were rinsed with tap water and then with dis-
tilled water. Sampling personnel washed their gloves between sam-
ples.
The eight 5-foot borings, FSE01 through FSE08, are located adja-
cent and parallel to the east bank of the West Swamp (Figure 2-3).
Sampling was conducted over depth intervals of 0 to 0.5 foot, 0.5 to
2.5 feet, and 2.5 to 5 feet.
It was originally planned to drill the 5-foot borings using a
drill rig and'solid stem augers; however, a high water table and
flooding along the east bank of the West Swamp resulting from the
heavy rains associated with Hurricane Juan prohibited vehicular access
to these sample locations. Locations FSE04 through FSE07 were under
water as much as 1 foot.
At each 5-foot boring location, the 0 to 0.5-foot sample was col-
lected as a grab sample and homogenized before being placed into the
sample container. Borings were continued manually to 5 feet. Sam-
pling at FSE01 and FSE02 was conducted using a split-spoon core sam-
pler which was driven to depth with a sledge hammer. Although repre-
sentative samples were obtained, this method was discontinued after
the first two holes because it proved to be too time-consuming. Fur-
thermore, because the split-spoon would not yield the necessary amount
of soil needed to obtain a duplicate sample from an interval, an addi-
tional coring adjacent to the first was required. The split-spoon
2-9
•-cvcieO paper
-------
o-r
SAMPLE
rSL
01 •
2'-4'
SAMPLE
FSL
02*
FSG ?SG
14» 15*
FSG FSG
23» 24 •
FSG
25 •
FSG FSG FSG
33* 34« 35-
FSG FSG FSG
43 • 44* 45«
LEGEND
DEPTH
0-6"
5'
10'
10.
10'
10-
IS'
SAMPLE
FSS
FSE
FSA
FSB
FSC
FSG
FSL
FSG
51 •
FSG
71*
FSG
62*
FSG FSG FSG FSG
S3* 54• 55* 56 •
FSG FSG FSG FSG FSG FSG
64* 66 • 66* 67* 88* 69 •
FSG
73*
FSG FSG FSG FSG FSG
75" 76 • 77 • 78* 79 •
, FSG FSG FSG FSG FSG FSA
85* 86* 87 • 88* 02*
FSA
01 •
FSG FSG
96* 97 •
FSA
03 •
. . ^. * - fOS
*
FSS
01*
SO 100
200
SCALE
300 400
500
600 FEET
0 10
40
80
120
160 METERS
Figure 2-3 SOIL BORING SAMPLE LOCATIONS
2-10
-------
was decontaminated before taking each sample. The outside of each
core "was scraped off before the sample was collected and homogenized.
Borings FSE03 through 08 were dug using a 4-inch stainless steel
bucket auger. Due to the potential for caving-in of the hole, as well
as the problem of surface and subsurface water entering the hole, a
5-foot length of PVC casing was advanced downhole simultaneously with
the augering. This technique was successful, especially in areas of
fluid sands and muds, as well as for borings situated in areas under
water at the time of the fieldwork. In addition, the installation of
PVC casing enabled proper grouting of the open hole upon completion of
the borings.
When collecting samples from the bucket auger, the materials on
both the tip and the upper portion of the auger were remqved. Only
the material from the inner core of the bucket was collected so as to
minimize the amount of soil in the sample which had come into contact
with the inner walls of the auger as well as any overlying loose mate-
rial. The bucket auger was rinsed between sample intervals and, along
with the PVC casing, was thoroughly decontaminated between boreholes.
Plastic spoons and zip-lock bags were discarded.
Samples taken from FSE04 through 06 (directly west of the former
Sapp Battery facility) were analyzed for pH, lead, cadmium, antimony,
and percent moisture. The other 5-foot borings were analyzed for pH,
lead, and percent moisture only.
The sixty-one 10-foot borings were conducted on the western half
of the property (Figure 2-3). Each of these borings was sampled con-
tinuously over depth intervals of 0 to 0.5 foot, 0.5 to 2.5 feet, 2.5
to 5 feet, 5 to 7.5 feet, and 7.5 to 10 feet.
Forty of the 10-foot borings were located in a grid pattern
extending north of the plant foundation and covering most of the
northwest quadrant of the site. Most locations were spaced at 75
feet; however, the southwestern portion of the grid is based on 150-
foot centers as requested by FDER, due to the absence of buried cas-
ings in this area and the low potential for heavy contamination. Bor-
ing locations in the grid are referenced as FSG14 through FSG97 (with
the two-digit number referencing the position of the point in columns
1 through 9 and rows 1 through 9, respectively).
2-11
recycled paper
-------
Several changes in grid boring locations were made due to field
conditions. FSG14 was moved 14 feet southeast due to large trees
preventing further access. FSG15 was moved 8 feet east, away from the
dug-out pond on the north property line. FS651 was moved 10 feet to
the southeast because of muddy conditions which prevented rig access.
FSG69 was moved 10 feet south of the berm on which it was originally
surveyed; and FSG91 was offset 8 feet northeast to avoid a deep pud-
dle.
All of the 10-foot borings in the grid were drilled using a drill
rig. A 4-inch diameter solid stem auger flight was drilled to a
depth of 5 feet and hydraulically extracted to avoid mixing the soil
sample material. The outside deposits on the auger were scraped off
to remove materials originating from the walls of the borehole during
extraction. After the 0 to 5-foot samples were collected, a clean
10-foot length of auger was inserted and the borehole was drilled from
5 to 10 feet. After hydraulically extracting the 10 feet of auger,
the outside material was scraped off the lower flight and the 5- to
10-foot samples were collected.
At all boring locations in the grid, the lower two samples (5 to
7.5 feet and 7.5 to 10 feet) were archived pending the review of the
analytical data from the 0 to 5-foot samples. Where warranted,
selected samples were removed from storage and analyzed. The selec-
tion and analyses of archived samples are discussed in Section 3.2.4.
Samples FSG34A, FSG35A-C, FSG43A-C, and FSG44A-C were split with
EPA, and complete data packages were prepared for these samples in
accordance with standard EPA procedures. These data packages were
submitted under separate cover.
Samples collected at seven 10-foot boring locations in the area
of the Northwest landfill were analyzed for pH, lead, cadmium, anti-
mony, and percent moisture. All other samples collected in the grid
were analyzed for pH, lead, and percent moisture.
Thirteen of the 10-foot borings (FSA01 through 13) were drilled
along the west bank of the West Swamp and to the south where the West
Swamp drains toward County Road 280 (Figure 2-3). Originally, FSA01
through 12 were plotted directly adjacent and parallel to the bank of
the swamp. However, field personnel decided to relocate FSA04 through
07 further upland to the west because it was felt that these borings
2-12
-------
would provide more useful information if located more centrally in
this battery chip-filled area between the boring grid of the previous
IRM effort and the West Swamp.
Each of the FSA borings was sampled continuously over the same
intervals as those in the grid; however, all samples were analyzed for
pH, lead, cadmium, antimony, and percent moisture, including those
taken over the 5 to 7.5-foot and 7.5 to 10-foot intervals. No samples
from this group were archived.
Due to a high water table and flooding resulting from the heavy
rains of Hurricane Juan, the drill rig could only gain access to seven
of the 13 FSA boring locations: FSA01, 05, 06, 07, 08, 12, and 13.
The FSA drill rig borings were conducted in a manner identical to that
described for the grid borings.
Six of the FSA 10-foot borings were conducted by hand with a
4-inch bucket auger. The auger was decontaminated at the completion
of each interval. At locations FSA09 and FSA10, PVC casing was pushed
downhole 5 feet to prevent a cave-in while augering the lower inter-
vals and to aid the grouting process. The PVC casing was decontami-
nated between boreholes.
Six 10-foot borings (FSB01 through 06) were conducted along the
southwest side of the berm that borders the liner-covered area (Figure
2-3). The borings were spaced at intervals averaging approximately
125 feet. Each of the borings was drilled using a drill rig and sam-
pled in the manner described for the 10-foot grid borings. Upon com-
pletion, all holes were grouted to the surface with portland cement.
Samples from the lower two intervals (5 to 7.5 feet and 7.5 to 10
feet) in each boring were archived pending evaluation of analytical
data from the upper intervals (0 to 5 feet). Archived samples
selected for analysis are discussed in Section 3.2.4. Samples from
the upper three intervals of all FSB borings were analyzed in the
laboratory for pH, lead, and percent moisture.
Two 10-foot borings penetrated the foundation of the Sapp Battery
plant building (Figure 2-3). One boring was drilled through the
foundation of the battery cutting saw room (FSC02), and the other was
drilled through the storage room foundation on the north side of the
building (FSC01). A 12-inch-diameter hole was first cut through the
2-13
-------
concrete foundation at each location to provide access for the auger.
The borings and sampling were conducted with a drill rig in the manner
described above for the 10-foot grid borings. Upon completion, both
holes were grouted to the surface with Portland cement.
The lower two samples from each boring were archived pending
evaluation of analytical data from the upper intervals. The upper
intervals (0 to 5 feet) were analyzed for pH, lead, cadmium, antimony,
and percent moisture.
Three borings were drilled in the battery casing dump adjacent
to the Northwest Swamp (Figure 2-3). Two of the borings (FSL01 and
FSL02) were drilled to 15 feet; FSL03 was drilled to only 10 feet.
Borings FSLOl and FSL02 were located in the north-central and south-
central portions of the filled area, respectively. In both cases, 15
feet of auger flight was drilled through the fill and then extracted
up the drill rig derrick with a winch. The depth of fill was deter-
mined from the augers and a sample was taken from mid-depth of the
fill in each case (and analyzed for lead, cadmium, antimony, pH, and
percent moisture). Because the depth of fill was shallower than
expected in each case (2 feet at FS101 and 6.5 feet at FSL02), a third
boring was conducted on the western edge of the fill area, adjacent to
the Northwest Swamp, to confirm the findings of the first two borings.
Boring FSL03 indicated fill and sparse battery casings to a depth of
approximately 5 feet. No sample was collected from FSL03 since it was
drilled for exploratory purposes only and was outside the planned
scope of work.
2.2.2 Fixation Study
Based on the initial data, lead-tainted soil samples were col-
lected 1n the soil sampling grid near the northeast portion of the
landfill. Composite samples weighing about 2,500 grams each were
collected from the 0 to 5-foot and 5 to 10-foot intervals. The method
of collection was the same as described earlier. These samples were
shipped to E & E's laboratory immediately following collection to
undergo the fixation study.
Two basic fixation methods were evaluated for leachate production
of contaminated soils from the Sapp Battery site. The fixation
methods chosen for study were cementitious and pozzolanic cementation.
2-14
-------
Much of the information concerning these techniques is proprietary;
therefore, development of solidification matrices was based on infor-
mation contained in Morgan _ejt _aj_. (1984).
The cementitious (cement-based) solidification technique involves
the sealing of contaminated soil in a matrix of portland cement,
whereas the pozzolanic solidification technique involves the sealing
of contaminated soil in a matrix of lime and fly ash. In the scope of
work, the pozzolanic technique called for a matrix of cement kiln dust
and fly ash; however, the cement kiln dust was unavailable and lime
was substituted.
The study consisted of fixing contaminated soil from the 0 to 5-
foot and 5 to 10-foot depth intervals. The composite was divided into
100-gram samples to be used in the fixing process. Samples from each
depth interval were mixed with varying percentages of solidification
agent (cement or lime and fly ash) and water. Three cement/soil com-
binations and three lime/fly ash/soil combinations were mixed for each
depth interval. Tables 2-4 and 2-5 outline the amounts used for each
mix.
Due to the dryness of the soils at the time of fixing., 30 weight
percent water was added to the solidification agent/soil mixture to
assure that binding would occur. This weight percentage of water was
selected based on a fixation study by Morgan et_ aj_. (1984). The mix-
ing of dry soil with dry solidification agent did not produce a bound
matrix. Addition of water was necessary to solidify the soils.
The following procedure was used in mixing the solidification
agent and contaminated soil:
o To prepare the soil composites, all of the soils from each
respective depth interval (0 to 5 feet and 5 to 10 feet) were
placed in a clean container and mixed with a stainless steel
tablespoon until homogeneous.
o To prepare the soil/cement mixtures, 100 grams of soil from
each depth interval composite was placed in a clean container
along with an appropriate amount of cement in accordance with
Table 2-4, and mixed with a stainless steel tablespoon until
2-15
pacer
-------
Table 2-4
SOIL SOLIDIFICATION - CE^NTITIOUS MATRIX
Depth
Interval Soil: Cement Soil Cement Water
(feet) Ratio (grams) (grams) (grams)
0-5 1:0.5 100 50 45
1:1.0 100 100 60
1:1.5 100 150 75
5-10 1:0.5 100 50 45
1:1.0 100 100 60
1:1.5 100 150 75
2-16
-------
homogeneous. If the mix remained "powdery" and did not bind,
the corresponding amount of water was added and mixed until
homogeneous.
o To prepare the soil/fly ash/lime mixtures, 100 grams of soil
from each depth interval composite was placed in a clean con-
tainer along with an appropriate amount of fly ash and lime in
accordance with Table 2-5, and mixed with a stainless steel
tablespoon until homogeneous. If the mixture remained "pow-
dery" and did not bind, the corresponding amount of water was
added and mixed until homogeneous.
Each of the 12 solidification mixes was allowed to dry for a
minimum of 24 hours. After tne 24-hour drying period had elapsed, the
12 solidification samples, along with two control samples (a 100-gram
sample from the 0 to 5-foot soil composite and a 100-gram sample from
the 5 to 10-foot soil composite) were analyzed for EP toxicity. A
total of 14 EP toxicity tests were conducted.
Based on the priority pollutant confirmation study, lead- con-
taminated soil samples were obtained adjacent to location FSG54.
These samples, however, exhibited such low lead concentrations that an
accurate analysis could not be performed, i.e., only 2.62 mg/kg lead
was detected in the non-fixed control sample for EP toxicity analysis.
As a result, a new sample collection scheme was developed. This
consisted of compositing portions of samples from locations FSG-53A,
B, C; FSG-76A, B, C; and FSG-87A, B, and C. For compositing purposes,
these samples were sieved through a 10-mesh screen and homogenized in
a glass jar with a spatula. Analysis of the composite sample showed a
concentration of 71,000 mg/kg. In accordance with the procedures
described above, three pozzolanic solidification mixes, three cementi-
tious solidification mixes, and one control sample were prepared for
the EP Toxicity test. The results of this revised fixation study are
presented and discussed in Section 3.2.7.
2-17
'ecvcied
-------
Table 2-5
SOIL SOLIDIFICATION - POZZOLANIC MATRIX
Depth
Interval
(feet)
0-5
5-10
Soil:
Pozzalime
Ratio
1:0.5
1:1.0
1:1.5
1:0.5
1:1.0
1:1.5
Soil
(grama)
100
100
100
100
100
100
Fly Aah
(grams)
25
50
75
25
50
75
Lime
(grama)
25
50
75
25
50
75
Water
(grams)
45
60
75
45
60
75
2-18
-------
2.3 SEDIMENT SAMPLING
Sediment samples were collected from a total of 36 locations:
2.5-foot borings at 12 locations, 5-foot borings at 15 locations, and
10-foot borings at nine locations (see Table 2-6). These borings were
conducted in swamp areas both on- and off-site. Sediment sample loca-
tions are given in Figures 2-4 and 2-5.
Sediment samples were analyzed for pH, lead, cadmium, and anti-
mony. Sediment sample collection involved the use of a 4-inch stain-
less steel bucket auger. All samples were collected using disposable
plastic spoons and homogenized in plastic zip-lock bags prior to being
placed into 8-ounce sample jars. Plastic was used for sample collec-
tion and homogenization in order to reduce the potential for outside
metals to contaminate the sediment sample. In some instances, how-
ever, extremely competent clays were encountered and the use of plas-
tic spoons was not practical. Consequently, stainless steel spoons
were used for sample collection.
Sediment sample collection techniques were similar to those used
for soil sampling. The samples were collected as composites over
specific depth intervals designated as interval A (0 to 0.5 foot),
interval B (0.5 to 2.5 feet), interval C (2.5 to 5 feet), interval D
(5 to 7.5 feet), and interval E (7.5 to 10 feet).
Most sediment borings were conducted by two field personnel in
chest waders; however, several of the 5 and 10-foot borings involved
the use of a 14-foot jon boat and up to three persons.
Of the 12 2.5-foot sediment samples (FMT01 through 05 and FMT07
through 13), seven (FMT07 through 13) were collected off-site to the
east-southeast in an area bordered by the railroad tracks, County Road
276, and Williams Road (Figure 2-5). This area encompasses approxi-
mately 1.5 square miles and includes Steele City, Steele City Bay, and
Little Dry Creek. The remaining five 2.5-foot sediment samples (FMT01
through 05) were collected in the Northwest Swamp (Figure 2-4).
The original location for FMT01 was situated on top of a grassy
knoll, 400 feet north-northwest of FMH04. Field personnel decided to
move the FMT01 location 400 feet east of its original location,
slightly inside the perimeter of the Northwest Swamp. This new
2-19
i oaoer
-------
About 150 ft.
toNE
X
r\>
i
FORMER SAW
RESIDENCE
LEGEND
• 2.5 Foot Boring
A 10-Foot Boring
* 5 Foot Boring
0 50
2OO
SCALE
400
600
800
SO
100
ISO
200 ME 7 EftS
Figure 2-4 ON-SITE AND ADJACENT SEDIMENT SAMPLE LOCATIONS
-------
LEGEND —
3 6 Foot Depth Boring
5 Fool Olplh Boring
10-Foot O«pth Boring
SCALE
0100 bOO
1000
2000
100 2OO
400
6OO
3000 FEET
800METEHS
Figure 2-5 OFF-SITE SEDIMENT SAMPLE LOCATIONS
-------
Table 2-6
ORGANIZATION OF COLLECTED SEDIMENT SAMPLES
Prefix
Code
Description
Total
Locations
Total
Samples.
Analyzed1
Total
Samples
Archived
Archived
Samples
Analyzed
FMH- 5-foot sediment borings
conducted in East Swamp,
Southeast Swamp, and Steele
City Bay
FMK- 10-foot sediment borings
conducted primarily in the
West Swamp and Steele City Bay
FMT- 2.5-foot sediment borings
conducted in the Northwest
Swamp, east of the railroad
tracks, primarily in Steele
City Bay and Little Dry Creek
15
12
33
31
27
15
18
Key;
1. Totals given include duplicate samples collected (OS*-}.
Note; Samples collected for Priority Pollutant Confirmation Study not included.
2-22
-------
location allowed collection of an FMT01 sediment sample at a suffi-
ciently discrete distance from FMT02 to maintain representativeness.
Each 2.5-foot boring involved the collection of samples from the
A and B intervals. All samples were collected with plastic spoons,
homogenized in plastic zip-lock storage bags, and placed into the
appropriate 8-ounce sample jar. Spoons and bags were discarded after
each use. Between each sampling interval, the bucket auger was
scrubbed with trisodium phosphate, rinsed with tap water, and then
rinsed with distilled water. The 24 samples were analyzed for pH,
lead, cadmium, and antimony.
Of the fifteen 5-foot sediment borings, eight were located in the
East Swamp (FMH01 through 08, Figure 2-4); four were located in Steele
City Bay, south of the site and west of the railroad tracks (FMH12
through 15, Figure 2-5); and three were located in the Southeast Swamp
(FMH09 through 11, Figure 2-4). Samples were collected over the A, B,
and C intervals using the same sampling and decontamination techniques
as for the 2.5-foot borings. However, given the fluid nature of the
sediments and the associated greater potential for caving-in of the
hole, a 5-foot length of PVC casing was advanced downhole simul-
taneously with the augering. This technique facilitated proper sam-
pling and decreased the possibility of cross-contamination between
sampling intervals. The PVC casing was decontaminated after each
borehole. The A and B interval samples were analyzed for pH, lead,
cadmium, and antimony; the C interval samples were archived pending
evaluation of the analytical results for the A and B horizons.
Of the nine 10-foot sediment sampling borings, five were located
in the West Swamp (FfKOl through 05; Figure 2-4); one was located on
the north side of County Road 280, adjacent to the culvert that was
constructed in the original drainage connection between the West Swamp
and Steele City Bay (FMC08, Figure 2-5); two were located in the
northwestern and northeastern corners of that portion of Steele City
Bay west of the railroad tracks (FMK07 and 06, respectively; Figure
2-5); and one was located south of the western site boundary, between
two cleared areas where apparently there may have once existed swamp-
like conditions (FIK09; Figure 2-5). However, the lithologies encoun-
tered in borehole FM<09 had greater affinity to the soil borehole
lithologies than the sediment borehole lithologies.
2-23
-^cycled saoer
-------
Samples were collected over the A, B, C, D, and E intervals for
each 10-foot boring using the same sampling and decontamination tech-
niques as for the 5-foot borings. However, in most instances stain-
less steel spoons were used to collect the 5 to 7.5-foot and 7.5 to
10-foot samples, due to the occurrence of an extremely competent clay
at these horizons which made the use of plastic spoons impractical.
Similar to the bucket auger, the stainless steel spoons were scrubbed
with trisodium phosphate, rinsed with tap water, and then rinsed with
distilled water between major sampling intervals. The A, B, and C
interval samples (0 to 5 feet) were analyzed for pH, lead, cadmium,
and-antimony, and the D and E interval samples (5 to 10 feet) were
archived pending evaluation of the analytical results for the A, B,
and C horizons.
2-24
-------
2.4 GROUNDWATER INVESTIGATION
2.4.1 Residential Well Sampling
As requested by FDER, 25 residential wells (Figure 2-6) were
sampled during the first week of fieldwork. These samples were
analyzed for lead, cadmium, nickel, arsenic, manganese, aluminum,
selenium, and antimony at detection limits specified in the Quality
Assurance Project Plan. Three duplicate samples and one trip bottle
blank were obtained and analyzed to meet QA/QC requirements.
Each residential well was allowed to flow for about 5 minutes in
order to purge the system prior to sampling. All residential well
samples were preserved with nitric acid, iced in coolers, and shipped
to the E & E laboratory. The pH, specific conductivity, and tempera-
ture of each well were measured and recorded in the field.
2.4.2 Monitoring Well Installation and Development
To better delineate the extent of groundwater contamination at
the site, 13 new monitoring wells were added to the existing network
of 29 monitoring wells and two plant wells (Figure 2-7). The addi-
tions consisted of five wells approximately 130 feet deep, four wells
approximately 60 feet deep, and four wells approximately 20 feet deep.
Many of the new wells were clustered in order to evaluate hydrau-
lic head differences and water quality variations between aquifer sys-
tems. Hence, two entirely new clusters containing shallow, inter-
mediate, and deep wells were installed in the eastern area of the site
in the direction of regional groundwater flow. In addition, wells
were installed in the unsampled aquifer systems at existing locations
MW-06, MW-09, and MVI-12 in order to provide clusters. For background
purposes, existing residential wells were identified, and a single
shallow well was installed at a northwest location that had not yet
been characterized.
The five approximately 130-foot wells were installed concurrently
with the eight shallower wells. Where possible, both drill rigs
employed the hollow stem auger technique. When conditions did not
permit the use of hollow stem augers, a fluid-rotary technique was
used. In these cases, biodegradable revert was used as the drilling
fluid to help prevent the introduction of extraneous metals into the
2-25
recycled oaper
-------
Figure 2-6 LOCATIONS OF RESIDENTIAL WELLS SAMPLED NOVEMBER
2-4,1985.
2-26
-------
IN)
I
ro
MW12A
FORMER SAPP
RESIDENCE
o so
200
SCALE
40O
600
800 FEET
010
50
100
160
200 METERS
Figure 2-7 LOCATIONS OF SAPP BATTERY SITE MONITORING WELLS
(Includes original site wells DW-01 and DW-02 as well as
plugged monitoring well MW—02A)
-------
groundwater. The excess revert displaced from backfilling the annul us
in the borehole was sprayed with clean water onto the site surface and
left to biodegrade. Table 2-7 provides data on the drilling technique
used for each of the 13 new wells. Appendix D contains the drillers'
logs.
Well construction (Figure 2-8) consisted of inserting a 2-inch
inside-diameter, flush-threaded, Schedule 40 PVC casing with a 10-
foot, 0.010-slotted PVC screen at the bottom into the newly drilled
borehole. Clean gravel was placed in the annular space between the
well screen and borehole wall to act as a filter between the screen
and the formation. This gravel extended from the borehole bottom to 2
feet above the screen and casing joint. The next 2 feet above the
gravel was filled with a bentonite plug to seal the screen from the
above annulus. The annular area above the bentonite plug was back-
filled with a 50/50 bentonite/lean concrete mixture to a level 2 feet
below the ground surface. The remaining 2 feet was filled with 100X
concrete and covered by a 2- by 2-foot square concrete pad formed to
route drainage away from the well. Finally, a 4-inch nominal-diameter
steel security cover with keyed-alike locks was placed over the pro-
truding well pipe and set into the moist concrete. All wells were
then surveyed accurately for location and elevation during development
of the site base map.
After each well had been completed, it was developed by forcing
compressed air against the well screen wall for 10 minutes and then
stopping the air for two minutes to let the well fully recharge. Each
well was subjected to this cycle of air purging and surging until such
parameters as pH, temperature, and specific conductivity had sta-
bilized.
2.4.3 Monitoring Well Sample Collection
Immediately prior to sampling each well, a total of three well
volumes was purged. This purging phase was used to obtain samples
in-situ for determination of ambient aquifer system conditions follow-
ing development and well stabilization. Teflon or PVC bailers were
used to collect all samples. Samples to be analyzed for metals were
preserved with nitric acid, iced in coolers, and shipped to the E & E
laboratory. In addition to the sampling effort (discussed in Section
2-28
-------
Table 2-7
CONSTRUCTION DATA FOR SUPPLEMENTARY MONITORING WELLS
Well
Number
MW06A
MW06C
MW09A
MW09B
MW12A
MW12B
MW21A
MW21B
MW21C
MW22A
MW22B
MW22C
MW23C
Drilling Technique
8-inch hollow stem auger
6-inch hollow stem auger
Fluid rotary
6- inch hollow stem auger
8-inch hollow stem auger
Fluid rotary
8-inch hollow stem auger
Fluid rotary
6- inch hollow stem auger
8-inch hollow stem auger
6-inch hollow stem auger
6- inch hollow stew auger
6-inch hollow stem auger
Depth Below
Land Surface
(feet)
134
21
127
53
130
60
131
60
21
134
62
26
17
Well Head
Elevation
Above Mean
Sea Level
(feet)
133.66
133.57
143.75
143.63
13B.60
138.53
134.14
134.32
133.06
1 37 . 30
136.19
136.63
140.39
2-29
paper
-------
• ••*
Ms
4" STEEL SECURITY CASE WITH LOCK
PVC WELL CAP
GROUND LEVEL
CONCRETE
2" PVC WELL CASING
8"BOREHOLE
50/50 CONCRETE-BENTONITE GROUT
BENTONITE PLUG
WELL SCREEN
GRAVEL PACK
Figure 2-3 TYPICAL MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION
2-30
-------
3.4), pH, specific conductivity, and temperature were measured and
recorded in the field.
All on-site monitoring wells (i.e., the 13 new wells, the 29
existing wells, and the two plant wells) were sampled and analyzed for
lead, cadmium, arsenic, manganese, aluminum, selenium, and antimony.
Three duplicate samples, two trip bottle blanks, and four equipment
rinsate samples were included with these samples in order to meet
QA/QC requirements. The duplicate samples were collected from wells
selected in the field. All parameters were analyzed at detection
limits specified in the Quality Assurance Project Plan.
2.4.4 Slug and Specific Capacity Tests
A total of nine slug tests and four specific capacity tests were
performed at the site following the monitoring well sampling effort in
mid-December 1985. The objective of this study was to obtain general-
ized hydraulic conductivity (K), transmissivity (T), seepage velocity
(V), specific capacity (Cs), and well yield (Wy) data for the on-site
aquifer systems.
Slug tests were conducted in monitoring wells MW-06A, MW-06B,
MW-06C, MW-12A, MW-12B, MW-12C, MW-22A, MW-22B, and MW-22C (Figure
2-7). These wells were selected for slug testing because they consti-
tute clusters that penetrate each of the three major aquifer systems.
In addition, these locations represent a cross section of the hydro-
geologic conditions across the site. Each slug test was conducted by
introducing a known volume of clean water into the well and con-
tinuously monitoring the water level response using a transducer
system.
In addition to the slug testing, specific capacity tests were
performed at wells MW-02B, MW-068, MW-14A, and MW-14C. These wells
were chosen because they offered the best combination of water- trans-
mitting characteristics (as defined by the recharge rates observed
during the purging operations) and lithology with respect to the
requirements for a successful test and representativeness. Each of
these tests involved pumping the respective well for about 1 hour at
full capacity and measuring drawdown continuously throughout this
period with the transducer system.
2-31
-------
3. RESULTS OF ANALYSES AND
DATA INTERPRETATION
3.1 PRIORITY POLLUTANT CONFIRMATION STUDY
3.1.1 Soils
The five soil samples and one duplicate sample were analyzed for
priority pollutant metals, sulfate, volatile organics, acid/base/
neutral organics, and pesticides (Appendix B).
FSA09P (and duplicate sample DSA09P) yielded the highest levels
of inorganics. Lead concentration is very high in the sample, and
arsenic and sulfates are present at levels significantly above the
other soil samples.
One or more of the following volatile organics were detected in
all of the soil samples: acetone; 1,1,1-trichloroethane; chloroform;
methylene chloride; and 2-butanone. The occurrence of these contami-
nants in the samples is attributable to laboratory cross contamina-
tion. All of these compounds are common laboratory solvents, and each
was found to be present in the laboratory instrument blank associated
with this soil sample run.
Base/neutral analyses of the soil samples revealed the presence
of an array of polynuclear aromatics and phthalates. However, the
bulk of these compounds were detected in FSA09P (and duplicate DSA09P)
only. Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate and di-n-butyl phthalate were the
only base/neutral organic compounds detected in FS623P, FS654P,
FSA06P, and the background sample FSY01. The occurrence of phthalates
in the samples is not easily explained; however, bis(2-ethylhexyl)-
phthalate is a common cross contaminant derived from both the labora-
tory and field decontamination processes. Plasticizers leaching from
buckets, brushes, water jugs, sprayers, insect repellent, and PVC pipe
3-1
-------
are potential sources leading to cross contamination of this compound.
It should be noted that bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate was found to be
considerably higher in FSA09P and duplicate DSA09P (15,000 ug/kg and
14,000 ug/kg, respectively). Again, leaching plasticizers are the
probable souYce, as this sample location was in an area of densely
deposited plastic battery chips.
The analysis of soil sample FSA09P also showed the presence of
10 polynuclear aromatic compounds (PNAs). Chrysene was detected at
800 ug/kg, phenanthrene was detected at 700 ug/kg in FSA09P, and
naphthalene at 500 ug/kg in the duplicate. The remaining PNA com-
pounds were found to be present but below the quantifiable detection
limit of 500 ug/kg. It is likely that these compounds are present in
this area due to residual motor oils and/or fuels associated with run-
off from the plant, or in the fill material (greasy battery casings)
placed here. N-nitrosodiphenylamine and 4-nitrophenol were also found
below quantifiable detection limits.
A soil sampling equipment rinsate was collected at one point
after a decontamination period. Trace amounts of sulfate, lead, and
nickel were detected. The results indicate that cleanliness of equip-
ment was adequate and that residual metals contaminants were of such
low levels as not to affect the integrity of data. The presence of
acetone; 1,1,1-trichloroethane; and methylene chloride in the bottle
blank is associated with laboratory sources (as evidenced by labora-
tory instrument blanks and trip bottle blank analysis).
3.1.2 Sediments
The five sediment samples collected were analyzed in the labora-
tory for priority pollutant metals, sulfate, volatile organics, acid/
base/neutral organics, and pesticides (Appendix B).
FMH17, collected from the West Swamp, yielded the highest concen-
trations of metals. Very high lead (6,560 mg/kg) and elevated levels
of antimony, arsenic, and copper are most notable in FMH17. Arsenic
was found at 1.76 mg/kg in the East Swamp (FMH18), and cadmium was
present in the East and Southeast swamps (0.975 mg/kg and 0.19 mg/kg,
respectively).
Acetone; 1,1,1-trichloroethane; and chloroform are present in all
samples. 2-butanone is present in all samples except FMH20 (Northwest
3-2
-------
Swamp). As these compounds are common laboratory cross contaminants
(and were each present in the laboratory instrument blank), it is most
probable that their presence is entirely attributed to a laboratory
source. Methylene chloride occurs in FMH19 and 20 and can be attrib-
uted to sample bottle preparation, since it was also detected in the
trip bottle blank (S8B01). Ethylbenzene and benzene were detected in
the Southeast Swamp (FMH19) below the 50 ug/kg quantifiable detection
limit. If these contaminants are not derived from a laboratory
source, it is possible that they could have been contributed by vehi-
cle exhaust, or runoff associated with the adjacent County Road 280
and nearby railroad bed. The presence of naphthalene (500 ug/kg) in
FMH19 is quite possibly associated with the asphalt pavement of County
Road 280, where tars may leach this material and runoff may carry it a
short distance to the Southeast Swamp.
Toluene was detected below the quantifiable detection limit in
both the East Swamp (FMH18) and Southeast Swamp (FMH19), and
4-methylphenol was detected at 1,100 ug/kg in the East Swamp.
The presence of phthalates in all sediment samples, including the
background location FMH16, suggests possible cross contamination from
plastic decontamination containers, etc. (see Section 3.1.1). The
highest concentration of bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate occurs in the West
Swamp sediment sample (FMH17, 3,000 ug/kg) and may reflect the leach-
ing of plasticizers from the large volume of plastic battery chips in
this small area.
3.1.3 Surface Water
Lead was detected in all surface water samples, including the
background sample FSW01 (0.014 ppm) collected as part of the priority
pollutant confirmation survey (Appendix B). However, the concentra-
tion in the West Swamp was two orders of magnitude higher than in the
other three locations (1.01 ppm and 1.06 ppm in FSW02 and duplicate
sample OSW02, respectively). Low levels of sulfate (24 to 66 ppm)
were also detected at all four locations.
Arsenic, silver, and zinc were each detected in only one sample
(FSW03, 0.006 ppm; FSW02, 0.006 ppm; and FSW04, 0.034 pom, respective-
ly). In contrast, nickel was detected in the duplicate West Swamp
sample (DSW02, 0.023 ppm), as well as in the background sample (FSW01,
3-3
oaoer
-------
0.038 ppm). As with the soil and sediment samples, the only volatile
organic compounds detected in the surface water samples were compounds
such as acetone; chloroform; 1,1,1-trichloroethane; and methylene
chloride which also-were detected in the laboratory instrument blank,
and hence are attributed to laboratory sources. Of the base/neutral
extractable compounds, only bis(2-ethy1hexyl)phthalate was detected,
the highest concentration occurring in background sample FSW01 (27
ppb). Acid compound 2-methylphenol was detected at 270 ppb in sample
FSW02, but its presence could not be confirmed in duplicate sample
DSW02 or after a re-extraction and analysis of FSW02.
3.1.4 Groundwater
All on-site monitoring well samples (FEW03C, FEW03BB, FEW03A, and
FEW09C) exhibited lead contamination, whereas lead was not detected in
the background well sample (FRW01) (Appendix B). The samples from the
surficial aquifer system (FEW03C and FEW09C) showed the greatest lead
contamination (4.96 and 6.27 ppm, respectively), whereas the samples
from the underlying intermediate and Floridan aquifer systems (FEW03BB
and FEW03A, respectively) exhibited a progressive decrease in the
level of lead contamination (1.28 and 0.609 ppm, respectively). Only
samples FEW03BB and FEW03C exhibited sulfate concentrations above the
250 ppm recommended USEPA and FDER drinking water standards (2,000 and
330 ppm, respectively).
Antimony, arsenic, and cadmium concentrations were found to be
above primary EPA drinking water standards and FDER standards for
arsenic and cadmium (0.05 ppm for arsenic, and 0.01 ppm for cadmium)
in sample FEW03C (0.118 ppm antimony, and 0.282 ppm arsenic) and
sample FEW03BB (0.246 ppm cadmium). THere are no primary or secondary
FDER drinking water standards for antimony. Relatively high nickel
and zinc concentrations were also detected in sample FEW038B (0.495
and 2.20 ppm, respectively). However, this zinc concentration is sig-
nificantly below the recommended primary EPA and FDER drinking water
standard (5.0 ppm). There is no recommended or required standard for
nickel. Primary drinking water standards were used for comparison
purposes, as these relate to public health.
Similar to the soil, sediment, and surface water samples, the
only volatile organic compounds detected in the groundwater samples
3-4
-------
were compounds such as acetone; 1,1,1-trichloroethane; and methylene
chloride which were also detected in the laboratory instrument blank,
and hence are attributed to laboratory sources. Of the base/neutral
extractable compounds, only bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate was detected.
However, it was detected in all of the samples, including the sam-
ple obtained from the background well. Of the acid compounds,
2-methylphenol was found to be present at a level below the detection
limits in sample FEW03C.
Similar to the results for the soil sampling equipment rinsate
and soil bottle blank, only trace metal concentrations were detected
in the groundwater sampling equipment rinsate. The only organic com-
pounds detected in the rinsate and bottle blanks were those attribut-
able to laboratory sources.
3.1.5 Conclusion
The analytical results of the priority pollutant confirmation
survey for soil and sediment samples suggest that lead contamination
is the primary problem, especially in the West Swamp and on its west
bank. These samples also showed elevated concentrations of antimony,
arsenic, and cadmium. Based on the findings of the priority pollutant
sampling, all of these parameters were chosen for analysis except
arsenic. The selected metals were also likely constituents of the
type of batteries processed at the site, based on findings of earlier
investigations.
Of the organics detected in soils and sediments, most notable was
the occurrence of phthalates and PNAs in the battery chip fill asso-
ciated with FSA09. These contaminants can be expected to occur where
heavy concentrations of crushed automobile batteries result in weath-
ering plastics as well as residual oils and greases. Assuming this to
be typical of battery casing fill, no further organics analysis of
subsequent soil and sediment samples was deemed necessary.
The analytical results of the priority pollutant confirmation
survey for surface water samples suggested that lead contamination was
the primary problem and that the highest levels of lead contamination
were restricted to the West Swamp. Given that lead contamination of
these surface waters is (1) assumed to be a direct result of runoff
from contaminated soils and (2) appears to be restricted to on-site
3-5
'ecvc:ed aaoer
-------
locations, then any remedial action directed toward elimination of
soil contamination should also serve to eliminate the source of sur-
face water contamination. In light of the above, and in order to
avoid duplication with the EPA-funded study by Dr. Livingston men-
tioned in Section 1 and with the 1983 FDER sampling (Watts 1984), it
was considered unnecessary to collect additional surface water samples
during the main part of the investigation.
The analytical results for the groundwater samples indicated
that all three of the on-site aquifer systems were contaminated with
lead, and thus that lead should be the major focus of the subsequent
investigation. It was also determined that groundwater samples should
be analyzed for cadmium, antimony, arsenic, and selenium because each
of these metals had been detected at a concentration above the USEPA
and FDER drinking water standards during the priority pollutant
investigation or the 1983 FDER sampling effort (Watts 1984). Finally,
aluminum and manganese were also included for analysis because the
results of the 1983 FDER sampling effort (Watts 1984) indicated that
these metals were occurring in high concentrations due to the decom-
position of soil clays caused by the sulfuric acid.
Despite the presence of sulfate concentrations above the drinking
water standard in two samples, it was decided by FDER not to include
this parameter in the main investigation because the existing data
base from the FDER 1983 sampling effort was considered adequate.
Although relatively high concentrations of zinc and nickel did
occur in one sample, it was not considered necessary to include these
metals among the analytical parameters. Zinc was not present in con-
centrations above the drinking water standard. Nickel (for which
there is no standard) was found in the background sample at approxi-
mately the same level as had been detected in most of the on-site
monitoring well samples collected by FDER in 1983 (Watts 1984).
3-6
-------
3.2 SOILS
'The shallow (0 to 10-foot) subsurface lithology at the site con-
sists of two units: a unit of sandy clay/clayey sand overlying a unit
of stiff, tight clay. Both of these units exhibit great variability
in their textural characteristics and color. In general, however, the
sandy clay/clayey sand is fine to medium-grained and tan to orange-
brown in color. In contrast, the clay unit contains little sand (al-
though rounded sand-, gravel-, and pebble-sized quartz was noted on
occasion) and is most commonly maroon or red with white to gray
marbling.
Although the clay unit is usually encountered within 5 feet of
land surface, lateral correlation of lithologic units is extremely
difficult because of the extensive earth-moving activities which
occurred at the site in the 1970s, as indicated by aerial photographs.
This extensive earth movement is also reflected in the three large
fill areas on-site where battery chips mixed with the sandy clay/
clayey sand were found at depths as great as 6.5 feet northeast of the
plant foundation, and possibly as great as 10 feet in the Northwest
Landfill area (Figures 3-1 and 3-13).
The following discussion presents the analytical data for the
soil sampling effort (see also Table C-l in Appendix C-l). Results
for the equipment rinsate and trip bottle blank samples are discussed
in Section 4.
3.2.1 Surface Soils (0 to 0.5-Foot Interval)
All of the soil samples were analyzed in the laboratory for pH.
For the total suite of surface samples (0 to 0.5-foot depth), includ-
ing those collected as surface composites (FSS01 through 18) and those
collected at the A interval of the borings, pH ranged from 2.66
(FSE08) to 8.54 (FSC01). For these samples, pH values above 6.5 were
generally associated with those samples exhibiting the highest lead
concentrations (Figures 3-2 and 3-3). In many cases, these are also
the areas that contain battery chips (Figure 3-1). However, because
there are several exceptions to this trend, it is not possible to draw
a direct correlation of pH to depth of chips, lead, antimony, or
Cadmium.
3-7
cdoer
-------
FSG FSG FSG
33» 34» 3S»
FSG FSG
44 • 45 •
LEGEND
Chips greater than
2 foot depth
,' j Chipi 1-2 foot
»-- depth
? Chips at unknown
depth
i FSG FSG FSG
S3* ! 54 • 55 • 56*
1.0 ' 0.5
FSG
FSS
01*
SCALE
0 SO 100 200 300 400 500 600 FEET
0 10 40
80
120 160 METERS
Figure 3-1 OCCURRENCE OF BATTERY CHIPS (Depth In Feet)
3-8
-------
I
UD
FORMER SAPf
RESIDENCE
LEGEND
Surface Composite
Sample. Analysis
forpH. Pb.Cd.Sb,
and % Molttuc*
Suiiace Composite
Sample. Analysis
for pH. Pb. and
% Multtui*
NOTE: Double numbers
indicate a duplicate sample
was taken.
O 60
200
SCALE
40O
600
800 FEET
010
60
1OO
160
200 METERS
Figure 3-2 LEAD CONCENTRATIONS (mg/kg) IN THE SURFACE SOIL
COMPOSITE SAMPLES
-------
FSG 1 pSG KSG
24 « 25 •
26 22
/*—} Greater than 500
FSG FSG FSG
33* 34* 35 •
2*6 42
mg/kg of rb
Not Applicable
FSG FSG
45*
17
- -*• 394
332
PLASTIC LINER
NOTE: Doubt* numtun
indieaw a duplicate sampl*
wvtakwi.
50 100
200
SCALE
300 400
500
600 FEET
0 10
40
80
120
160 METERS
Figure 3-3 LEAD CONCENTRATIONS (mg/kg) IN THE A INTERVAL
(0-0.5 Feet) SAMPLES OP ON-SITE SOIL BORINGS
3-10
-------
Areas where lead concentrations were lowest (surface samples on
the'far eastern and northeastern portion of the site; Figures 3-2 and
3-3) exhibited pH values of approximately 4 to 5.5. There are no
apparent indications of a trend when comparing pH to lead, antimony,
and cadmium concentrations in the B interval (0.5 to 2.5 feet), C
interval (2.5 to 5 feet), D interval (5 to 7.5 feet), and E interval
(7.5 to 10 feet). High lead concentrations were noted in samples with
pH values of less than 4.0, greater than 6.5, and in between. Simi-
larly, samples with very low lead concentrations exhibit the same wide
range of pH values.
Analysis of the A interval samples and surface composite samples
(FSS01 through 18) indicate widespread lead contamination in the sur-
face (Figures 3-2 and 3-3). .
The surface soils between the plastic liner and the West Swamp
are grossly contaminated, as indicated by samples FSA05A through 10A,
which exhibit lead concentrations of 9,390 to 155,000 mg/kg. Another
area of gross contamination occurs northeast of the plant foundation,
where FSG86A and 96A show lead concentrations of 90,000 and 16,1007
169,000 mg/kg, respectively. Concentrations of 22,300 and 169,000
mg/kg lead were recorded in the duplicate sample analyses for FSG86A
and 96A. In the southwestern corner of the Northwest Landfill area,
FSG51A yielded 19,200 mg/kg lead (22,700 mg/kg in the duplicate sample
analysis). Along the earthen berm southwest of the plastic liner,
FSB03A exhibited 66,100 mg/kg lead.
Areas where high lead levels (greater than 500 mg/kg) are found
include: (1) the battery chip-filled area between the West Swamp and
the plastic liner, (2) the battery chip-filled area northeast of the
foundation, (3) the northwest battery casing landfill, (4) the area
around the truck weighing scales northwest of the plant foundation,
(5) beneath the plant foundation at FSC02A, and (6) along the south-
western side of the plastic liner extending to the south of the West
Swamp. East of the West Swamp, only FSE07A and FSS15 showed lead
levels greater than 500 mg/kg (1,110 mg/kg and 1,670 mg/kg, respec-
tively).
In the surface samples analyzed for antimony and cadmium, it is
readily seen that the levels at which these metals occur generally are
proportional to the lead concentrations in the same sample interval.
3-11
'?cvcied paper
-------
This is most evident in Figure 3-4, where lead and antimony levels are
compared for FSA01 through FSA13. Antimony and cadmium were also
present in FSC02A (beneath the plant foundation), and in lesser con-
centrations on the east bank of the West Swamp (FSE05A), and at sev-
eral locations around the Northwest Landfill.
3.2.2 B Interval Soils (0.5 to 2.5 feet)
At the B interval (0.5 to 2.5 feet), five distinct areas exhibit
lead concentrations greater than 500 mg/kg lead (Figure 3-5). The
area between the plastic liner and the West Swamp remains highly con-
taminated, with FSA06B, FSA07B, and FSA08B containing 57,000, 45,900,
and 29,800 mg/kg lead, respectively. A group of six grid locations
northeast of the plant foundation have lead concentrations ranging
from 3,940 to 96,600 mg/kg. Battery chips and whole casings occur in
this area to depths ranging from 3 to 6.5 feet.
The Northwest Landfill area is heavily contaminated with lead
over the B interval. Whole battery casings, large chips, and other
debris extend to at least this depth in the fill throughout the land-
fill area (as indicated at 10-foot and 15-foot boring locations). The
lead concentration at FSG51 increases to 84,200 mg/kg over the B
interval, whereas the lead levels at FSG23B and FSG53B increase with
depth to 4,790 and 16,700 mg/kg, respectively.
Southwest of the plastic liner and adjacent to the former loca-
tion of the acid holding pond, FSB02B and FSB03B showed 325 mg/kg lead
(746 mg/kg in the duplicate sample) and 650 mg/kg lead, respectively.
South of the liner and the West Swamp, FSB06B, FSA11B, and FSA13B
exhibited lead levels of 3,260, 4,750, and 4,735 mg/kg (8,842 mg/kg in
the duplicate sample), respectively.
Figure 3-6 indicates a continuing correlation between lead and
antimony. In contrast, cadmium levels are low, occurring somewhat
more sporadically, and not necessarily proportional to lead concentra-
tions.
3.2.3 C Interval Soils (2.5 to 5.0 feet)
At the C interval (2.5 to 5 feet), there are four general areas
where high lead levels continue to occur (see Figure 3-7). Lead
-------
i?
20
n
Q
1OO
go -
80
7O
5O -i
5O -
40 -
3O -
20 -
1O -
o -4
01 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 09 10 11
FSA SAMPLE NUMBERS FROM NORTH TO SOUTH
12 13
SOO
Q.
0.
O
3OO i
10O -
01 01 02 03 04 05 06 O7 08 09 O9 10 11
FSA SAMPLE NUMBERS FROM NORTH TO SOUTH
12 13
Figure 3-4 LEAD VERSUS ANTIMONY IN THE A INTERVAL (0 to 0.5 foot depth)
IN FSA SAMPLES ALONG THE WEST BANK OF THE WEST SWAMP
1-13
-------
mg/kg of Pb
N/A Not Applicant
NOTE: Ooufato numbm
indican a duplicate (ample
was taken.
50 100
200
SCALE
300 400
SOO
600 FEET
0 10
40
SO
120
160 METERS
Figure 3-5 LEAD CONCENTRATIONS (mg/kg) IN THE B INTERVAL
(0.5-2.5 Feet) SAMPLES OF ON-SITE SOIL BORINGS
3-14
-------
20 -
10-
01 02 03 04 05 03 00 07 OB 09 1O 11 12
FSA SAMPLE NUMBERS FROM NORTH TO SOUTH
13
soo
I
TOO -
600 -
4OO-
300-
2OO-
100-
•9-
•f-
01 02 O3 04 05 03 06 07 08 09 1O 11 12 13
F5A SAMPLE NUMBERS FROM NORTH TO SOUTH
13
Figure 3-6 LEAD VERSUS ANTIMONY IN THE B INTERVAL (0.5 to
2.5 foot depth) IN FSA SAMPLES ALONG THE WEST
BANK OF THE WEST SWAMP
3-15
caper
-------
Greater than 500
mg/kg of Pb
N/A Not Applicable
NOTE: Doubt* numbers
indicate • duplicate sample
was taken.
01*
so 100
200
SCALE
300 400
500
600 FEET
0 10
80
120
160 METERS
Figurt 3-7 LEAD CONCENTRATIONS (mg/kg) IN THE C INTERVAL
(2.5-5.0 F«et) SAMPLES OF ON-SITE SOIL
BORINGS
3-16
-------
concentrations in the area southwest of the plastic liner decrease to
just under 500 mg/kg in FSB02C and FSB03C (460 and 400 mg/kg, respec-
tively). In contrast, between the liner and the West Swamp, the lead
levels at FSA06C, FSA07C, and FSA08C remain very high, ranging from
6,560 to 28,100 mg/kg.
The battery chip-filled area northeast of the plant foundation
also remains highly lead-contaminated at the C interval. Eight boring
locations had lead levels greater than 500 mg/kg. This indicates more
extensive lead contamination laterally than at the B interval. In
addition, five of these locations show a substantial increase in lead
concentrations at this depth; in particular, FSG66 increased from 17
mg/kg in the B interval to 6,560 mg/kg in the C interval, whereas
FSG76 increased from 8,320 mg/kg in the B interval to 25,300 mg/kg in
the C interval.
The Northwest Landfill area also continues to exhibit high lead
levels at the C interval, with FSL02 exhibiting a lead concentration
of 27,500 mg/kg. (FSL02 was conducted as a 15-foot boring in the
landfill.)
Lead occurs in FSG71C at 601 mg/kg, almost three times higher
than that detected in the overlying interval. Similarly, south of the
West Swamp, FSA11, FSA12, and FSA13 show increasing lead concentra-
tions in the C interval.
As at the A and B intervals, antimony levels in the C interval
FSA samples generally increase and decrease in parallel with the lead
concentration (Figure 3-8). Similarly, in the Northwest Landfill,
antimony levels increase with increasing lead concentrations. Cadmium
is present at 1.1 mg/kg in FSC02C (beneath the plant foundation),
where the lead concentration is 24 mg/kg.
A single composite sample was collected at mid-depth of the bat-
tery casing fill (6.5 feet total depth).
3.2.4 D and E Interval Soils (5.0 to 7.5 Feet and 7.5 to 10.0 Feet)
As discussed in Section 2.2, samples from the 0 interval (5 to
7.5 feet) and E interval (7.5 to 10 feet) of the 48 FSB, FSC, and FSG
borings were archived pending evaluation of the analytical data from
the A, B, and C interval samples. Based on the results of the A, B,
and C evaluations, it was determined that the D and E interval samples
3-17
-------
g§
3(5
02
O3 04 O5 06 07 08 08 09 1O 11
FSA SAMPLE NUMBERS FROM NORTH TO SOUTH
12 13
16O
01
O2 03 04 05 O6 07 O8 O8 09 10 11
FSA SAMPLE NUMBERS FROM NORTH TO SOUTH
Figure 3-8 LEAD VERSUS ANTIMONY IN THE C INTERVAL (2.5
to b.O root depth) IN FSA SAMPLES ALONG THE WEST
BANK OF THE WEST SWAMP
3-18
-------
from 27 locations (54 samples) should be analyzed. Of these 27
locations, 18 (36 samples) were selected based on the occurrence of
high lead concentrations in the C interval, seven (14 samples) were
chosen based on their proximity to locations that exhibited high C
interval lead concentrations, and two (four samples) were chosen as
background locations. The sample locations for each of these
categories are as follows:
o Locations with High Lead Concentration in C Interval
FSG23
FS651
FSG53
FSG64
FSG65
FSG66
o Locations
Concentrat
FSG54
FSG56
FSG67
FSG71
FSG76
FSG77
FSG86
FSG87
FSG91
proximate
ion in C
FSG75
FSG78
FSG85
FSG95
FSG96
FSG97
FSB02
FSB03
FSB04
to locations with High Lead
Interval
FSG88
o Background Locations
FSG15 FSG34
The 54 D and E samples were analyzed in January 1986. The
results of these analyses are included in Table C-l (Appendix C) and,
together with the results of the previously conducted analyses of the
FSA D and E interval samples, are discussed below.
Figures 3-9 and 3-10 show the lead concentrations measured in the
0 and E interval samples, respectively. Comparison of Figure 3-9 with
the corresponding C interval data of Figure 3-7 indicates that, in
general, lead concentrations are substantially lower in the D inter-
val. Only two samples (FSG640 and FSB04D) exhibit increased lead
concentrations in the D interval (from 230 to 1,110 mg/kg and 128 to
3-19
re-:vc:ed oaoer ..
-------
FSG IF9B1 FSG FSG
68* lf>»l •?• «•
12
FSA
01*
NOTE: Ooubto numtMn
indfem • duplten* nrnpt*
w« Uk«n.
SO 100
200
SCALE
300 400
500
600 FEET
0 10
40
•0
130
160 METERS
Figure 3-9 LEAD CONCENTRATIONS (mg/kg) IN D INTERVAL
(5.0 TO 7.5 FEET) SAMPLES OF ON-SITE SOIL
BORINGS
3-20
-------
FSS
01*
NOTE: OoubtenufnMn
indicat* • duplicate Mmpta
«»• taken.
90 100
200
SCALE
300 400
500
600 FEET
0 10
40
120
160 METERS
Figure 3-10 LEAD CONCENTRATIONS (mg/kg) IN E INTERVAL
(7.5-10.0 Feet) SAMPLES OF ON-SITE SOIL
BORINGS
3-21
-------
278 mg/kg, respectively). However, many of the D interval samples
continue to show relatively high lead concentration at locations where
C interval concentrations were high (in particular, the 16,200 mg/kg
level detected in FSG86D).
The changes in lead concentrations between the D and E intervals
are not as well-defined as those between the C and D intervals, al-
though the overall trend is toward substantially lower concentrations
in the E interval samples. Several samples still exhibit lead concen-
trations greater than 500 mg/kg, and FSA06E is the only E interval
sample to exhibit a substantial increase in lead concentration rela-
tive to the D interval value (from 330 to 928 mg/kg).
In general, antimony concentrations decrease in parallel with the
lead concentrations (Figures 3-11 and 3-12). In contrast, the 4.82
mg/kg cadmium detected in FSA13D was the highest concentration found
in any soil sample analyzed for this metal.
3.2.5 Northwest Landfill Characterization
There were several borings conducted in and around the northwest
landfill (Figure 3-13). FSL01 and FSL02 were conducted as 15-foot
exploratory borings, where a sample was collected at mid-depth of the
battery chip fill and analyzed for pH, lead, cadmium, antimony, and
percent moisture. FSL01 had 2 feet of fill which consisted primarily
of whole battery casings mixed with sandy clay. The remaining 13 feet
of the borehole was a brown-gray sandy clay. A composite sample of 0
to 2 feet had 3,020 mg/kg lead, in the primary sample, and 9,670 mg/kg
lead in the duplicate sample. FSL02 was found to have 6.5 feet of
battery casings and sandy clay fill. The remaining 8.5 feet of the
borehole was a brown-gray sandy clay. A sample collected from 2 to 4
feet indicated 27,500 mg/kg lead.
Because FSL01 had only 2 feet of battery chip fill (less than
expected), a third exploratory hole (FSL03) was bored to 10 feet on
the western edge of the landfill. Five feet of battery chip fill was
encountered, underlain by 5 feet of gray sandy clay. No samples were
collected.
Five 10-foot grid borings are situated within the limits of the
landfilled area along the southern and eastern edges. As shown in
Figure 3-13, these boreholes had battery casings and chips mixed with
3-22
-------
4.3
zS
P§
01 02 O3 O4 O3 O6 O7 06 O9 1O 11 12 12 13
FSA SAMPLES FROM NORTH TO SOUTH
SO
Q.
o.
70 -
BO -
50 -
4O -
30 -
2O -
10-
O -o
01 02 03 04 03 06 07 08 09 1O 11
FSA SAMPLES FROM NORTH TO SOUTH
12 12 13
Figure 3-11 LEAD VERSUS ANTIMONY IN THE D INTERVAL (5.0
to 7.5 foot depth) FSA SAMPLES ALONG THE WEST
BANK OF THE WEST SWAMP
3-23
-------
1.2
02
03 O4 03 05 07 08 09 1O 11 12
FSA SAMPLE NUMBERS FROM NORTH TO SOUTH
13 13
0.7
I
O.8 -
0.3 -
O.4 -
0.3 -
0.2 -
0.1 -
O-o
O1 02 03 O4 03 06 07 Ofl 09 1O 11 12 13 13
FSA SAMPLE NUMBER FROM NORTH TO SOUTH
Figure 3-12 LEAD VERSUS ANTIMONY IN THE E INTERVAL (7.5
to 10.0 foot depth) FSA SAMPLES ALONG THE WEST
BANK OF THE WEST SWAMP
3-24
-------
APPROXIMATE LOCATION
OF EXCAVATED FISH POND
SHOWN ON MARCH 1971
AERIAL PHOTO
KNOWN LIMIT
OF LANDFILL
APPROXIMATE SOUTHERN EXTENT OF LANDFILL
FSG62
NO CHIPS
28 50
SCALE
100
200F6ET
0 3 10
30
30 METERS
Figure 3-13 DEPTH OF BATTERY CASING FILL IN NORTHWEST
LANDFILL AREA
3-25
ed
mill rti* ifitMlMt IK
-------
sandy clay to depths ranging from 1 to 6.5 feet. During the installa-
tion of monitoring well MW09B, drilling logs recorded that battery
chips occurred in fill material to a depth of approximately 10 feet.
Borings conducted within the limits of the landfill indicate that
battery chip fill varies from 1 to at least 10 feet in thickness.
However, the landfill was preceded by a fish pond excavated around
1970/1971 to an unknown depth and extending across most of the cur-
rently filled area (Figure 3-13).
To what maximum depth battery casing and/or contaminated fill
material was placed into this pond site is not known. It is possible
that battery casing fill extends beyond 10 feet at one or more loca-
tions.
In all, 14 samples were collected (as well as three duplicate
samples) from seven locations on the northwest landfill. Lead levels
for these 14 samples ranged from 690 mg/kg (FSG43 at the B and C
intervals) to 84,200 mg/kg (FSG51 at the B interval). An average con-
centration for the lead-contaminated soils of the landfill, based on
analysis of FSL01 and FSL02, is 16,922 mg/kg lead. When considering
the additional 12 samples collected in the filled area, the mean lead
concentration in the samples is 13,911 mg/kg, with a standard devia-
tion of 21,883 mg/kg.
3.2.6 Soils Investigation Summary
In summary, gross lead contamination of the surface soils (0 to
0.5 foot) is generally restricted to the western half of the Sapp Bat-
tery site (Figures 3-2 and 3-3). In contrast, gross lead contamina-
tion of soils between 0.5 and 10 feet below land surface is, for the
most part, restricted to four areas (Figures 3-5, 3-7, 3-9, and 3-10):
the Northwest Landfill; northeast of the plant foundation; between the
West Swamp and the plastic liner; and south of the West Swamp and
plastic liner. The high lead concentrations in the first three of
these areas appears to be correlated with the greater thicknesses of
battery chip fill (Figure 3-1), whereas lead contamination in the
southernmost area is probably a result of its being located in a
former surface drainage path (see Section 1.3).
Although lead concentrations generally decrease with depth
down to 10 feet, there are many exceptions to this trend. This
3-?6
-------
inconsistency presumably reflects the combined influences of variabil-
ity .in source distribution together with variability in soil infiltra-
tion and cation exchange capacities. In particular, the usually sub-
stantial decrease in lead concentrations from the C interval to the D
and E intervals (Figures 3-7, 3-9, and 3-10) presumably reflects the
reduced permeability characteristics of the increasingly clayey soils.
Nevertheless, the possibilities of lead contamination of deeper (i.e.,
below 10 feet) soils cannot be ruled out due to: (1) the continued
occurrence of high lead concentrations at the D and E interval depths,
(2) the less well-defined pattern of change for lead concentration
between the D and E intervals, (3) the great lateral and vertical
variability in soil lithology, and (4) the general association of
groundwater contamination in all three on-site aquifer systems with
areas of elevated shallow (0 to 10 feet) soil contamination (see Sec-
tion 3.4). However, the overall trend toward reduced lead concentra-
tions with depth over areas of reduced size does suggest that deeper
soil contamination might only have a minimal long-term adverse envi-
ronmental impact if not included as part of the final clean-up pro-
gram.
Overall, cadmium concentrations are lower and occur somewhat more
sporadically than antimony concentrations. In contrast, changes in
antimony concentration more closely parallel changes in lead concen-
tration, both within a single interval as well as between intervals
(see Figures 3-4, 3-6, and 3-8). It is probable that a remedial pro-
gram designed to clean up the lead-contaminated soils would effec-
tively reduce any adverse environmental impacts associated with
cadmium and antimony soil contamination.
3.2.7 Fixation Study
The results of the chemical fixation analysis for the lead
extracts are presented in Table 3-1. As is illustrated in this table,
the cementitious mixture was much more effective in binding lead than
the pozzolanic cement.
The cementitious mixture (Portland-Type 4) exhibited excellent
binding capacity for all samples (1126A, B, C). This is represented
3-27
,., ,,1,,.. i,,„„-.,„,„
-------
Table 3-1
RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF EXTRACTS
FROM EP TOXICITY TESTS (mg/1)
Samples
Maximum
Allowable
Concentration
Pozzolanic
E 4 E Lab Number 86-
11260
1126E
1126F
Sample Identity
Lead
Ash: Lime:
Soil
0.25:0.25:1
76.4
Ash: Lime:
Soil
0.5:0.5:1
<0.06
Ash: Lime: Blank
Soil
0.75:0.75:1
7.17 <0.06
5.0
Cementitioua
E & E Lab Number 86-
Sample Identity
Lead
1126A
Concrete:
Soil
0.5:1
0.085
11268
Concrete:
Soil
1:1
<0.06
1126C
Concrete:
Soil
1.5:1
<0.06
5.0
•86-1126 is a composite of FSG-53 A, B, C; FSC-76 A, 8, C; FSG-87 A, 8, C. The composite has a
lead concentration of 71,000 mo/kg. The EP Toxicity test on the control sample (untreated
composite soil material) yielded 59.4 mg/1.
3-23
-------
by the extremely low recoverable lead values for each sample. As
compared to the maximum allowable concentration of 5.0 mg/L, all three
samples were near or below detection limits. Only 1126A exhibited a
slight lead recovery of 0.085 mg/L. The concentrations of 1126B and C
were below the detection limit of 0.06 mg/L.
Lead recovery from samples from the pozzolanic mixture showed an
order of magnitude difference between 1126E (<0.06 mg/L), 1126D (76.4
mg/L) and 1126F (7.17 mg/L).
These results demonstrate that Portland- type IV cement and a 1:1
mixture of soils to pozzolan will solidify the soils and reduce the
concentration of lead in the leachate to acceptable levels. It is
expected that cement requirements will be reduced and control of
contaminants increased with process optimization.
3-29
CdDfi' nnlii^ mill .•Mviri.cutii in
-------
3.3 SEDIMENTS
The analytical results generated by the sediment sampling con-
ducted in November/December are presented in Table C-2 in Appendix C.
The following discussion on the occurrence and distribution of lead,
cadmium, and antimony in swamp and creek sediments within the study
area is keyed to five geographical areas in order to more clearly
address the trends occurring in each. These five areas are: (1) the
Northwest Swamp, (2) the West Swamp, (3) the East Swamp, (4) the
Southeast Swamp, and (5) Steele City Bay/Little Dry Creek wetland
system.
Sediment borings were conducted to depths of 2.5 feet (FMT bor-
ings), 5 feet (FMH borings), and 10 feet (FMK borings). The sampling
intervals were at depths identical to those for the soil borings:
interval A (0 to 0.5 foot), interval B (0.5 to 2.5 feet), interval C
(2.5 to 5 feet), interval D (5 to 7.5 feet), and interval E (7.5 to
10 feet).
3.3.1 Northwest Swamp
In the Northwest Swamp, five 2.5-foot borings were conducted
(FMT01 through FMT05; Figures 2-4 and 3-14). The A interval samples
at all locations showed elevated lead levels ranging from 111 to 593
mg/kg. This would indicate that the swamp has been affected by the
Northwest Landfill as well as by surface runoff from the area north-
west of the plant foundation, which discharges to the swamp south of
FMT05. Lead levels decrease greatly in the B interval at all loca-
tions, ranging from 25 mg/kg in FMT05B to 70 mg/kg in FMT04B. This
decrease most likely reflects the uptake of lead by the organic-rich
sediments that overlie the shallow tight clays encountered within the
A interval.
A trace of cadmium (0.66 mg/kg) was detected in FMT03A, whereas
traces of antimony were detected in both FMT03A and FMT05A (0.66 and
0.55 mg/kg, respectively). At each of the five locations, pH
decreases with depth.
3.3.2 West Swamp
In the West Swamp, five 10-foot borings were conducted (FMC01
through 05; Figures 2-4 and 3-14). The upper A, B, and C interval
samples were analyzed for pH, lead, cadmium, antimony, and percent
3-30
-------
About 160 It.
lo NE
FORMER SAW
RESIDENCE
LEGEND
10 Foot Boring
(FMK)
6 Foot Boring
(HMHl
2 5 Foot Baring
(FMT)
0 to 0.6-Foot Depth
Sample
05 to 2.5-Fool Depth
Sample
2.5 to 5.0- Foot Depth
Sample
Duplicate Samples
O 60
2OO
SCALE
4 DO
600
800 FEET
0 10.
10O
160
200 METERS
Figure 3-14 LEAD CONCENTRATIONS (mg/kg) IN ON SITE A. B. AND
C INTERVAL SEDIMENT SAMPLES
-------
moisture. The lower (D and E) interval samples were archived pending
the analytical results for the upper samples.
In the upper 6 inches (A interval), lead levels were found to be
quite high in FM<01A and FMK04A only (10,900 and 1,270 mg/kg, respec-
tively). This suggests that high lead levels in surface sediments are
somewhat unevenly distributed throughout the West Swamp; however, the
southernmost portion of the swamp is most highly contaminated. In the
southernmost sample (FMK01A), where the highest lead level occurs, a
cadmium concentration of 1.15 mg/kg and an antimony concentration of
36.2 mg/kg were detected.
In the B intervals of FMC01 through 05, it becomes even more
apparent that lead has been concentrated in the southern end of the
West Swamp. Lead increases in.FPK01B to 12,500 mg/kg and in FNK02B to
1,280 mg/kg, whereas FMK03B exhibits a slight decrease, and FMK04B and
FMK05B show a drastic decrease with depth (Figure 3-14). Cadmium
increases slightly in FMC01B and antimony increases in both FMK01B and
FNK02B.
The C interval in borings FM<01 and FMK02 shows a substantial
decrease in lead contamination. This suggests that lead contamination
must sharply decrease at some point within the overlying B interval.
It should be noted that although FMK03 does not show excessive
lead contamination in the A, B, and C intervals (115, 82, and 60
mg/kg, respectively), it does exhibit the smallest decrease in lead
concentration with depth. This boring was conducted in the deepest
depression in the swamp, and tighter clay materials were not encoun-
tered above approximately 5 feet (i.e., the clay was much deeper than
in the other four borings). Consequently, either the more permeable
nature of the overlying sandy materials has allowed lead contamination
to migrate into the deeper horizons, or the reduced cohesiveness of
this material increases the tendency for mixing to occur during auger-
ing, affecting the representativeness of the sample.
Cadmium and antimony were not detected in any of the C interval
samples in the West Swamp.
Almost all of the 15 samples from the West Swamp which were
analyzed exhibited pH values of 4.0 to 5.5. The exceptions were the
most highly lead-contaminated samples (FMC01A and 01B), which had pH
values of 7.05 and 6.00, respectively. Analogous to the situation
3-32
-------
with the shallow soil samples along the southwest bank of the West
Swamp-, these higher pH values could be a result of acid-neutralization
by a lime trench that was constructed on the west bank by EPA in 1979
as an emergency remedial effort.
Based on the upper interval results, analysis of the archived D
and E interval samples from the West Swamp was not deemed necessary.
3.3.3 East Swamp
Eight 5-foot borings were conducted throughout the East Swamp
(FMH01-08; Figures 2-4 and 3-14). The A and B interval samples were
analyzed for pH, lead, cadmium, antimony, and percent moisture; the C
interval sample was archived pending the analytical results for the
upper intervals.
In the upper 6 inches (A interval), only sample FMH01A exhibited
a very high lead concentration (1,860 mg/kg); the other seven A inter-
val samples ranged from 17 to 251 mg/kg lead. The West Swamp drains
into the East Swamp, and therefore, lead-contaminated sediments have
in the past been carried into the East Swamp and primarily deposited
at the mouth of the canal discharge (i.e., in the vicinity of FMH01).
The lead levels that occur in the other seven A interval samples do
not indicate any lateral pattern of dispersion and seem to occur some-
what sporadically (Figure 3-14).
Cadmium occurs above detection limits in six of the eight A in-
terval samples and, like antimony, does not exhibit a lateral disper-
sion pattern. The highest cadmium and antimony levels occur in FMH06A
(3.74 mg/kg and 48.1 mg/kg, respectively) in the extreme northeastern
portion of the swamp.
The B interval samples generally indicate the same trend of
decreasing lead values as seen in the Northwest and West swamps. Only
FMH048 Indicated an increase in lead concentration with depth (up to
20 mg/kg).
In general, cadmium concentrations are lower in the B interval
samples. However, cadmium levels in FMH01B and FMH06B (1.21 and 2.85
mg/kg, respectively) decrease only slightly in contrast to the sharp
decreases in lead. Antimony levels decrease sharply from the A to B
intervals in all cases.
3-33
'"CVC ed CdOC' i-c.il.it> mill
-------
With the exception of FMH01 and FMH06, the East Swamp samples
showed little change in pH with depth. The pH values slightly
increased or slightly decreased with depth in six of the borings,
ranging from 3.34 to 3.72 in the B interval samples. However, in
FMH01 and FMH06, pH decreased sharply with depth (from 4.79 to 3.07
and from 3.71 to 2.79, respectively). The FMH01 and FMH06 samples
also exhibited the highest lead levels and sharpest decrease in lead
concentration with depth.
Based on the A and 8 interval trends in the East Swamp, it was
decided not to analyze the C interval archived samples.
3.3.4 Southeast Swamp
Three 5-foot borings were conducted in the Southeast Swamp
(FMH09, 10, and 11; Figures 2-4 and 3-14). The A and B interval sam-
ples were analyzed for pH, lead, cadmium, antimony, and percent mois-
ture; the C interval sample was archived pending the analytical
results for the upper intervals.
Station FMH11, located in the extreme southeast corner of the
swamp, adjacent to the culvert crossing under County Road 280 into
Steele City Bay, was the only boring conducted in open water. Borings
FMH09 and FMH10 were conducted in two of the unsubmerged northern
reaches of this swamp.
Sample FMH11A showed the highest lead and antimony levels (186
and 14 mg/kg, respectively), as well as the only occurrence of cadmium
(1.93 mg/kg) above detection limits. Lead levels decreased substan-
tially in the B interval in all samples (Figure 3-14), and neither
antimony nor cadmium was detected.
In FMH11, pH dropped from 4.35 in the A interval to 3.39 in the B
interval. The other two borings showed no change of pH with depth.
Based on the A and B interval trends for the metals in question,
none of the C interval samples were analyzed for the Southeast Swamp.
3.3.5 Steele City Bay
As discussed in Section 2.3 and illustrated in Figures 2-5 and
3-15, three 10-foot borings were conducted in Steele City Bay (FMK06,
07, and 09), four 5-foot borings were conducted in Steele City Bay
(FMH12 through 15), and seven 2.5-foot borings were conducted in wet-
lands from U.S. Highway 231 to Little Dry Creek (FMT07 through 13).
3-34
-------
a
o
I
u>
tn
A
B
C
LEGEND
10-Foot boring (FMK|
6-Fool boring (FMH)
2.6-Foot boring (FMT)
0 to o B foot depth compodl*
O 6 to 2 6 foot depth compoilt*
26 to B 0 loot depth compotlt*
(FMK boclnatonly)
( ) Duplicate umplai
SCALE
O 100 600
I OOP
2OOO
3000 FEET
O 100^200 300 400 6OO 6OO >OO BOO MEETEHS
Figure 3-15 LEAD CONCENTRATIONS (mg/kg) IN OFF SITE A. B. AND C INTERVAL
SEDIMENT SAMPLES
-------
One 10-foot boring (FNK08) was conducted at the entrance to the cul-
vert under County Road 280, just north of the road. All samples were
analyzed for the selected metals, except for the samples from the D
and E intervals of the 10-foot borings and the C interval of the
5-foot borings, pending review of the results of the upper intervals.
In general, the trend of lead concentration decreasing with depth
that was seen for the on-site swamps was also seen throughout the off-
site wetlands system. This was most dramatic in boring FMK08, situ-
ated in the former drainage path from the site to Steele City Bay.
Here, a lead concentration of 34,700 mg/kg was detected in the A
interval, decreasing to 953 mg/kg in the B interval and to 110 mg/kg
in the C interval. The same trend occurs in FMK07 (40 feet southeast
of the culvert), where lead decreases from 6,660 mg/kg (6,410 mg/kg in
the duplicate sample) in the A interval to 31.4 mg/kg and 2.57 mg/kg
in the B and C intervals, respectively. Cadmium and antimony concen-
trations similarly decrease with depth. Vertical trends are, for the
most part, consistent, and lateral dispersion of lead contamination
can be seen to extend as far as the FMT09A sediments. However, in the
area south of the culvert crossing to FMT11, lateral migration becomes
somewhat more difficult to determine. Sample FMT10A, collected in the
small wetland area adjacent to the road connecting County Road R276
and Williams Road, yielded 212 mg/kg lead. It is possible that this
location has been affected by the drainage it receives from the
adjacent road and a nearby automobile salvage operation directly to
the north. In addition, FMT12A and FMT12B (upstream sample location
in Little Dry Creek, 100 feet downstream from the County Road 276
bridge) showed lead values of 10 and 57 mg/kg, respectively, which are
higher than the lead concentrations in the A and B intervals of FMT13
(downstream from the confluence with the Steele City Bay surface
drainage). The lead detected in the FMT12 samples suggests the possi-
bility that runoff from County Road 276, or some other source north of
the bridge, is contributing lead to the drainage system. Conse-
quently, the lead contamination in FMT10A, as well as the upstream
contamination in FMT12A and B, raise the possibility that the lead
detected 1n FMT13A and B may not be entirely attributable to transport
from the Sapp Battery site via the Steele City Bay wetlands system.
3-36
-------
It should be noted that in some cases (particularly in Steele
City Bay) lead values were considerably higher than those in sediment
samples collected in the same general areas by FDER in 1983. It is
possible that this is due to the fact that the FDER samples were col-
lected from the upper inch of sediment only, whereas the E & E sedi-
ment samples were collected from the"upper 6 inches. Given that the
major contamination stress of the Steel City Bay swamps occurred over
such a relatively short period of time, organic detritus accumulations
may have been so rapid that some of the more contaminated sediments
are several inches below the surface. The lower portion of the 6-inch
core may contain lead values that better reflect this earlier period
in the swamp's history.
Based on the fairly well-defined trends of decreasing lead,
cadmium, and antimony concentrations with depth in all of the Swamp
sediments, it was not recommended that any of the archived C, D, and E
interval samples be analyzed.
3-37
paper ,-, ,,!.,.:> ,,<«t
-------
3.4 GROUNDWATER
3.4.1 Hydrologic Analysis
All wells installed for this study complement the existing moni-
toring system constructed during the FDER-RI. Hence, the monitoring
wells fall into three depth categories: (1) the C level wells, with
depth ranges of 5 to 20 feet, to observe the surficial aquifer system;
(2) the B level wells, with depths ranging from 35 to 100 feet, to
observe the intermediate aquifer system; and (3) the A level wells,
with depths ranging from 110 to 190 feet, to observe the Floridan
aquifer system. Although a few wells are classified A wells, the
lithology in which the screen was set reflected B level stratigraphy.
This is the case for MW-09A, MW-12A, and MW-13A.
Water levels were measured and recorded for all 44 monitoring
wells at the Sapp Battery site on December 11, 1985. Tables D-l
through D-3 in Appendix D present these data in feet above mean sea
level (MSL). From the listed data, potentiometric maps were
constructed for each aquifer system.
3.4.1.1 Aquifer Potentiometric Surfaces
The water levels for the surficial aquifer system at the site
exhibit a horizontal gradient of less than IX to the southeast (Figure
3-16). The water table elevation ranges from 136 feet above MSL in
the northwest portion of the site to 127 feet MSL in the southeast
portion. The gradient increases west of the West Swamp and levels off
to the east. A groundwater trough dipping southward appears to occur
in the area of well MW-16C. This trough most likely is a result of
the one-time connection between the West Swamp and Steele City Bay,
before County Road 280 was constructed. In addition, as shown on the
map, both the West Swamp and East Swamp areas have a direct influence
on the surficial aquifer system, inasmuch as the water table gradient
levels off to the east.
The major potentiometric surface within the intermediate aquifer
system slopes to the south-southwest in the western portion of the
site; in the eastern half of the site it slopes to the west (see
Figure 3-17). Horizontal gradients are, on the average, about 1% in
both cases. Water level elevations range from about 136 feet MSL in
the north and east to 122 feet MSL in the southwest. Figure 3-17
3-38
-------
a
o
CO
I
CO
UD
Control Period D«t» DwwntMr 1986
Q SO
200
SCALE
4OO 6OO
800 FEET
O10 BO
1OO
150
2OO METERS
Figure 3-16 GENERALIZED POTENTIOMETRIC MAP OF THE SURFICIAL
AQUIFER SYSTEM (FEET ABOVE MEAN SEA LEVEL)
-------
i
->
o
0 50
200
SCALE
4OO
6OO
800 FEET
01O SO
1OO
ISO
2OO METERS
Figure 3-17 GENERALIZED POTENTIOMETRIC MAP OF THE INTERMEDIATE
AQUIFER SYSTEM (FEET ABOVE MEAN SEA LEVEL)
-------
indicates the presence of a southwest-trending groundwater trough that
extends across the eastern half of the site. This feature appears to
be the result of a buried paleo-stream channel that meanders south-
westerly through the intermediate sediments. Water levels in five
wells (MW-01B, -03B8, -07B, -12B, and -228) open to the intermediate
aquifer system do not correlate with the major potentiometric surface.
Three of these wells (MW-01B, -07B, and -22B) may represent an addi-
tional semi-confined aquifer within the intermediate system, possibly
lying within the Suwannee or Marianna limestone. The remaining two
wells (MW-03BB and MU-12B) have water levels that suggest a third
minor zone within the intermediate aquifer system.
The Floridan aquifer system in this area exhibits a general
easterly flow direction, toward the Chipola River (Figure 3-18). The
horizontal hydraulic gradient is very gentle (less than 0.01X), with a
water level of 101 feet MSL in the west and 99 feet MSI in the east.
This study confirmed the conclusion of the FDER-RI (Watts 1984) that
several sinkholes breach the Floridan aquifer system at the site.
Based on the monitoring well borehole logs, this breaching is limited
to the area west of the West Swamp, with evident penetration at the
MW-09 and MW-12 locations, in addition to those identified in the
FDER-RI at the MW-03 and MW-13 locations.
3.4.1.2 Aquifer Physical Test Results
As mentioned in Section 2.4, limited slug and specific capacity
tests were conducted on 13 wells at the site (see Table 0-4 in Appen-
dix 0). Raw field data from these tests were used to calculate trans-
missivity (T), hydraulic conductivity (K), seepage velocity (V), spe-
cific capacity (Cs), and well yield (Wy) values.
The method used to calculate K and T values from the slug test
data is based on a technique for determining these parameters from
partially penetrating wells in unconfined and confined aquifers
(Bouwer and Rice 1976). For this procedure, semi logarithmic graphs
are prepared for decreasing water level versus Increasing time.
Values from the straight line portion of the graph (or the immediate
response) are used for obtaining K and T from two equations derived by
Bouwer and Rice (1976). The calculated values for each slug test are
given in Table 0-4 in Appendix D. It should be understood that
3-41
-------
t\>
FOHMEHSAPP
RESIDENCE
Conttol Period Date: December 1985
0 50
2OO
SCALE
400 600
800FCCT
O10 50
100
tiiO 20O MCTCH3
Figure 3-18 GENERALIZED POTENTIOMETRIC MAP OF THE FLORIDAN
AQUIFER SYSTEM (FEET ABOVE MEAN SEA LEVEL)
-------
because the slug test procedure evaluates only an area of the aquifer
within a short radial distance of the well, values will not necessar-
ily be representative of the aquifer system as a whole or of its
heterogeneity. In addition, this procedure assumes that: flow above
the water table can be ignored; head losses as water enters the well
are negligible (i.e., the well screen does not impede water movement);
and the aquifer is homogeneous and isotropic.
The T values shown in Table D-4 in Appendix D are very low for
all of the B and C level wells and for MW-12A; for wells MW-06A and
MW-22A, the T values are high. Data for B and C level wells and for
MW-12A are consistent with predicted values, due to the sandy clay/
clayey sand deposits at the screened intervals in these wells. As
expected, the T values for wells MW-06A and MW-22A are much greater
than those for the B and C level wells; however, these values are an
order of magnitude lower than the pump test T value given in the
FDER-RI (53,836 gpd/ft). This difference most likely results from the
much shorter radial distance of investigation for the slug test tech-
nique, in that it does not reflect the effect of enhanced flow paths
associated with the zones of secondary permeability known to occur in
the Floridan aquifer system. Thus, the pump test data are far more
accurate than the slug test results.
In general, the K values range from 10~3 to 10~6 centi-
meters per second (cm/sec). These values are consistent with the
ranges defined by Freeze and Cherry (1979) for the respective material
type and with the calculated values for the designated core sample in
the FDER-RI. Similar to the T values, the K values for MW-06A and 22A
are slightly lower than the FDER RI pump test value of 5 x 10-3
cm/sec. This difference is probably due to the limitations of the
slug test technique. However, the T and K values in the slug- tested
wells reflect the values that were expected based on observed pumpage
and lithologic characteristics.
Horizontal groundwater seepage velocities were calculated from
the previously determined K values using estimated effective porosi-
ties. This procedure involves using the equation V » Kl/n, as
described by Fetter (1980), where:
K a hydraulic conductivity,
I = hydraulic gradient, and
n = effective porosity.
3-43
-------
The calculated V values listed in Table D-4 in Appendix D indicate
very slow movement of groundwater in all three aquifer systems. How-
ever, the V values for even the more transmissive A level wells (MW-06
and MW-22) may still represent an underestimation of actual flow velo-
cities as a result of the limitations of the slug test technique in
relation to the existence of enhanced flow paths, as discussed above.
The raw specific capacity (Cs) data generated in the field were
evaluated in accordance with the method given by Freeze and Cherry
(1979). The calculated values are shown in Table D-4 in Appendix D.
From these data, theoretical well yields were determined by dividing
the Cs value by a footage value at which the aquifer would effectively
be pumped. In all cases, this depth was considered to be at the well
bottom. Most of the B and C level wells and wells MW-09A, MW-12A, and
MW-13A will have yields similar to that of well MW-14C.
Wells MW-02B and MW-06B show yields greater than the rest of the
B level wells (except for MW-03BB) because they are located in the
apparent gravelly paleo-stream channel of the intermediate aquifer
system. It is believed that well MW-03BB would produce similar
yields, based on observations made during purging. The well yield
difference between MW-02B and MW-06B reflects the fact that MW-02B has
a higher percentage of the very rounded milky white quartz gravel
found in the eastern deposits.
As expected,- the yield illustrated for well MW-14A is substan-
tially greater than the B and C level well yield values. Except for
wells MW-09A, MW-12A, and MW-13A*. the other wells in the A network
will exhibit yields similar to that of MW-14A, and a few will exhibit
substantially greater yields. For instance, during development of
wells MW-06A, MW-21A, and MW-22A, it was estimated that these wells
would likely produce in excess of 500 gallons per minute (gpm).
3.4.2 Chemical Analysis
3.4.2.1 Aquifer Field Parameters
Tables D-5 through D-8 in Appendix 0 present the pH, conductiv-
ity, and temperature values measured in the field for all monitoring
*Based on the water levels measured in these wells (Table D-3 in
Appendix D) as well as on the hydrogeologic parameters calculated for
well MW12-A (Table D-4 in Appendix D) monitoring wells MW-09A,
MW-12A, and MW-13A will henceforth be considered open to the inter-
mediate aquifer system.
3-44
-------
and residential wells sampled during the current investigation as well
as during the 1983 FDER sampling. In addition, Tables D-12B and D-12C
list these parameters for samples collected from the residential wells
by ESE, Inc., in April 1984 and January 1985.
Examination of these data reveals several trends and anomalies.
First, groundwater from the residential Floridan aquifer system wells
surrounding the site exhibits the most uniformly alkaline pH values as
well as consistently low conductivities (Tables 0-8, D-12B, and
D-12C), reflecting the fact that these wells have not been as severely
affected by contamination from the Sapp Battery operation. In con-
trast, the pH of groundwater from the on-site Floridan aquifer system
wells (Table D-7) has generally decreased from the reported 1983 FDER
monitoring well values, which agrees with the generally increased
level of contamination indicated by the corresponding metals data.
For the most part, the groundwater in the surficial and inter-
mediate aquifer systems (Tables D-5 and D-6) has exhibited a signifi-
cant increase in pH from the reported 1983 values, reflecting the
cessation of acid-generating operations and the subsequent remedial
activities at the site. This effect is most dramatically illustrated
in the southeast corner of the site, where the pH of groundwater from
wells MW-18C, MW-19C, and MW-20C has increased from 3.0-3.5 to 5.0-
5.8. Wells that continue to produce groundwater of a somewhat low pH
(<5) can be divided into two categories: those which lie within or
downgradient of heavily contaminated areas (MW-03BB, MW-03C, and
MW-16C); and those which lie immediately downgradient from the acidic
water of the East Swamp (MW-15B and MW-21C).
The conductivities measured in groundwater from the on-site wells
show significant variability within each aquifer system (Tables D-5
through D-7, Appendix D). In general, the lower conductivity values
reflect the interaction of the groundwater with the aquifer matrix in
the proximity of recharge areas, whereas the higher conductivity
values reflect elevated metal concentrations. However, there is no
linear correspondence between metal concentration and conductivity
(i.e., the highest conductivities do not occur in groundwater exhibit-
ing the highest metal concentrations), as is readily apparent when the
3-45
caper ,-,,,!<,••< .m,l rimr-mum-iii
-------
data .in Tables D-5 through D-7 are compared with the corresponding
metal concentrations in Tables D-8 through D-ll. This deviation from
a linear correspondence is probably the result of a combination of two
factors:
1. The fact that the conductivities were obtained from unfil-
tered and unacidified samples, whereas the metal concentra-
tions reflect analyses of unfiltered samples that had been
preserved with concentrated nitric acid to a pH of approxi-
mately 1 (i.e., adsorbed or matrix metal ions could have been
leached from suspended sediments within the sample); or
2. The presence of anionic or cationic species (e.g., iron,
magnesium, or sulfate) that were not included in the anal-
yses.
The first of the above two factors will be considered in greater
detail later in this section.
3.4.2.2 Aquifer Lead Concentrations
Figures 3-19 through 3-22 present the lead concentrations mea-
sured in groundwater from the surficial aquifer system, intermediate
aquifer system, and Floridan aquifer system (on-site and residential
wells), respectively, during the current investigation as well as dur-
ing the 1983 FDER sampling effort. These results, as well as the
analytical results for the other metals, are presented in Tables D-9
through 0-16 in Appendix D.
Figures 3-19 through 3-22 illustrate that essentially all of the
on-site monitoring well samples exhibit some degree of lead contamina-
tion, whereas only groundwater from residential wells east, east-
southeast, and east-northeast of the site currently exhibit lead con-
centrations above assumed background levels, as shown by MW-23C, 22C,
and 22B, and other upgradient residential wells (<5 to 7 ppb; see
Figure 3-22).
Lead values detected in residential wells over five sampling
episodes follow the east, east-southeast, and east-northeast trend
(See Table D-12D). Residential wells GW-01, GW-03, GW-09, GW-10,
GW-12, GW-20 and GW-21 (See Figure 2-6) usually show positive lead
3-46
-------
.*. I-.--;:-•.•
1
12C vf MW-1
FORMER SAPP
RESIDENCE
NOTE: November December
1985 ratulti are above Ilia lilt*
•nd May Ociobw 1983 rwulli
•ra below lh« line.
NOTE: Double numbeit
Indicate • duplicate umpto
was taken.
0 bO
2OO
SCALE
400
600
800 FEET
O 1O
100
160
20O METERS
Figure 3-19 LEAD CONCENTRATIONS (ppb) IN MONITORING WELLS OPEN TO THE SURFICIAL
AQUIFER SYSTEM
-------
CO
I
4*
CO
l'^;.'- i
• * * - * i/<
NOTE: Novambw December
1985 results ere ebove the line
end Mey-October 1983 results
I ere below the line.
NOTE: Double numbers
indiceie e duplicele simple
wes taken.
0 SO
2OO
SCALE
400
600
800 FEET
OIO
BO
100
ISO
200MtTER3
Figure 3-20 LEAD CONCENTRATIONS
-------
a
0
MM
FOAMEA 6AWT
RCSIOEMCC
NOTE. Nov«mb«r Docember
1986 r*sult> «f« »bov« tha lin*
•ndM*y-October 1983r«tuli»
arc below th« tin*.
* R*umpl*d
NOTE: Doublo numtMtt
indtc*M • duplical* umpl*
WM ukan.
&O 200
SCALE
4OO
600
BOO FEET
010
5O
1OO
16O
20OMCTERS
Figure 3-21 LEAD CONCENTRATIONS {ppb) IN WELLS OPEN TO THE FLOR1DAN AQUIFER
SYSTEM
-------
NOTE:
rwuH»««ibo»«th«lin«
AufM 31 Ufunbtr 1.1983
NOTE: Doubt* nu
indicate • duplicm wnpta
MM taken.
QUAO»«NGU LOCATION
1 OLOMCTfM
Figure 3-22 LEAD CONCENTRATIONS (ppb) IN RESIDENTIAL WELLS
3-50
-------
values. From 1983 to 1986 the lead values are somewhat sporadic. In
many.cases, lead was detected in one sampling, undetected in the next
sampling, and detected again in the third sampling effort. In any
case, the three-year monitoring period did not show any significant
lead increases with time and the majority of residential well contami-
nation is below 20 ppb.
The highest lead concentrations within the surficial aquifer sys-
tem occur across the western half of the site in close correspondence
with the areas of maximum soil contamination (Figures 3-2, 3-3, and
3-5). Similar to the increase of pH discussed earlier, groundwater
from the surficial wells in the southeastern quadrant of the site
currently exhibits reduced lead concentrations compared to the 1983
FDER levels. It is believed that soils and groundwater in this area
were initially subject to lead contamination as a result of the area
being the original location of the Sapp Battery operation and, more
importantly, overflow and infiltration of contaminated waters from the
West Swamp. As a result of the cessation of site operations and the
subsequent remedial activities, this primary source of contamination
was eliminated and the elevated lead concentrations diminished by the
flushing action of infiltrating rainwater. As will be discussed in
the next section, it is probable that the current levels of lead
contamination exhibited by groundwater from these wells is primarily
controlled by the direction of flow within the surficial aquifer sys-
tem.
Analogously, it is assumed that the decreases in lead concentra-
tion on the western half of the site (most notably in the vicinity of
the pond) reflect the Influence of the remedial activities. Although
this explanation cannot be readily applied to explain the decreased
lead concentration 1n the sample from monitoring well MW-11C, it is
more significant that a relatively low lead concentration was detected
at this location 1n both instances. Given the presence of highly con-
taminated soils immediately to the north (Figures 3-2, 3-3, and 3-5),
the presence of the low lead levels supports the potentlometric map
for this aquifer system, which indicates that flow should be predomi-
nantly from the west-northwest (i.e., from an uncontaminated area).
3-51
caper I.,,,, „„,( ..,„„•„,„„, „,
-------
In contrast to the beneficial effects of the remedial activities dis-
cussed above, these same activities have probably resulted in the
increased lead concentration detected in the groundwater from monitor-
ing well MW-13C, given that much of the surface runoff from the site
is now funneled to this location.
Figure 3-20 indicates that the highest lead concentrations in the
intermediate aquifer system also occur across the western half of the
site in areas where the surficial aquifer system was most contami-
nated. Similar to the results for the surficial aquifer system,
changes in the intermediate system lead concentrations from 1983 to
1985 can be attributed to the effects of remedial activities combined
with the direction of groundwater movement.
Lead concentrations measured in the on-site Floridan aquifer sys-
tem monitoring wells (Figure 3-21) are again highest in the western
half of the site. Furthermore, the Floridan system groundwater (with
the exception of MW-05A) exhibits very large increases in lead concen-
tration relative to the 1983 levels. A possible explanation for these
results will be offered in the next section.
3.4.2.3 Aquifer Selected Metals Concentrations
Among the other metal species for which analyses were conducted--
arsenic, antimony, cadmium, selenium, nickel (in the residential wells
only), aluminum, and manganese--only the latter two metals (aluminum
and manganese) were found in high concentrations in a number of
samples (Tables D-9 through D-12, Appendix D). Arsenic concentrations
significantly exceeded EPA and FDER primary drinking water standards
(0.05 ppm) in two samples (MW-03C and MW-12A, 0.282 and 0.092 ppm,
respectively). The EPA recommended guideline on antimony (0.146 mg/1)
was not exceeded in any sample. In contrast, cadmium concentrations
in excess of the drinking water standard (0.01 ppm) were found in
several samples: MW-12C, 16C, and 18C (0.014, 0.076, and 0.023 ppm,
respectively); MW-03B, 03BB, and 07B (0.021, 0.246, and 0.032 ppm,
respectively); and DW-02 and MW-13A (0.026 and 0.011 ppm, respec-
tively). Selenium was detected in 11 on-site monitoring wells, with
four exhibiting concentrations in excess of the EPA drinking water
3-52
-------
standard of 0.01 ppm. These four wells are: MW-3A, MW-3B, MW-148,
and MW-16C. They had selenium concentrations of 0.029, 0.020, 0.013,
and 0.019 ppm, respectively. Only one residential well sample
exhibited a nickel concentration above the detection limit of 0.020
ppm (GW-18, 0.025 ppm). In general, the occurrence of these metals
was associated with the presence of relatively high concentrations of
lead.
Most of the on-site groundwater samples exhibit very high alumi-
num and manganese concentrations (Tables D-9 through D-ll, Appendix
0). In FDER's interpretation of the analytical results of the 1983
sampling, these high concentrations were attributed to decomposition
of the aquifer matrix materials by acidic groundwater (Watts 1984).
Although a comparison of the 1983 pH data in Tables D-5 through D-7
with the corresponding aluminum and manganese concentrations in Tables
D-13 through D-15 supports this interpretation, it cannot be as
readily invoked to explain the results of the current sampling pro-
gram because many of the groundwater samples with elevated aluminum or
manganese concentrations do not exhibit low pH values. Furthermore,
although the FDER-RI, using equilibrium thermodynamics, calculated a
maximum theoretical aluminum solubility of 149 ppb for the Floridan
aquifer system (at a pH of 7.4), the fact that Floridan lead concen-
trations currently far exceed the calculated maximum theoretical lead
solubility of 81 ppb suggests that reaction kinetics may play an even
more critical role in the precipitation of metal species than
expected. Consequently, despite the alleviation of the acidic condi-
tions favorable to leaching, the potentially slow precipitation of
metal complexes could possibly result in very high concentrations of
aluminum and manganese being retained in solution.
Interpretation of these data becomes even more difficult when the
lead versus aluminum, lead versus manganese, and aluminum versus man-
ganese relations are considered (Tables D-9 through D-ll, Appendix 0).
Although the highest aluminum and manganese concentrations are gen-
erally associated with high lead concentrations, the correspondence is
very imperfect and exhibits major deviations in all three aquifer
systems (with the exception of the lead versus manganese relation in
the surficial aquifer system). Furthermore, manganese and aluminum
concentrations exhibit a very poor correlation, even though both
3-53
pacer
-------
metals are assumed to be derived from acid decomposition of aquifer
matrix materials. Similar deviations from a linear correspondence
occur in the 1983 FDER results (Tables D-13 through D-15, Appendix
D).
Despite the complexities described above, there is a possible
interpretation if consideration is given to the following:
1. Several of the grotindwater samples contained suspended sedi-
ments derived from the aquifer. Given that the samples were
not filtered before preservation with concentrated nitric
acid (to a pH of approximately 1), any adsorbed or matrix
metals associated with the suspended material could have been
subject to leaching. This probably also influenced the 1983
FDER results, although the effect may have been somewhat
reduced in the low pH samples.
2. Under the relatively acidic groundwater conditions that
existed during the 1983 FDER sampling effort, aluminum and
lead appear to have been more mobile than manganese, based on
the occurrence of these metals in groundwater from the down-
gradient residential wells east of the site (Table D-16).
3. In contrast, under the more alkaline pH conditions that
existed during the current sampling program, manganese
appears to have replaced aluminum as the more mobile species.
This conclusion is indicated by the close correlation of
manganese and lead in the surficial aquifer system in which
the change in pH conditions was most pronounced, and the fact
that manganese now accompanies lead in groundwater from those
downgradient residential wells which previously exhibited
elevated aluminum concentrations.
4. Groundwater pH is not the only control on metal species
mobility; hence, the extremely intricate combined effect of
pH, redox conditions, presence of complexing ions or organic
species, mineralogy and cation exchange capacity of the
aquifer matrix material, and reaction kinetics—all of which
3-54
-------
may exhibit vertical and lateral variability on-site—will
determine to what extent a specific metal is mobilized at any
given moment or location.
Consequently, it is possible that in response to physical and
temporal variations in the hydrogeochemical environment of the Sapp
Battery site, aluminum and manganese have been locally mobilized or
demobilized (i.e., precipitated or adsorbed onto the aquifer matrix).
The pattern of groundwater metal concentrations that this could pro-
duce might be to some extent obscured by the leaching of adsorbed or
matrix metals due to acidification of unfiltered samples (especially
if located in a zone of current or past demobilization). As discussed
in the following section, the excellent agreement between the pattern
of lead concentrations in each aquifer system and the corresponding
general groundwater flow directions indicated by Figures 3-16 through
3-18 suggests that lead is mobile under the existing conditions and
not as subject to the factors which produce the variability in alumi-
num and manganese.
3.4.3 Contaminant Migration
It is clear from the results of the current sampling effort that
all three aquifer systems underlying the Sapp Battery site are
contaminated. As noted in the preceding section, the highest lead
concentrations occur over the western half of the site in close asso-
ciation with those areas exhibiting the highest levels of soil con-
tamination (compare Figures 3-2 through 3-4 with Figures 3-18 through
3-20). Comparison of Figures 3-16 and 3-17 shows that water level
elevations in the surficial aquifer system are higher than those in
the intermediate aquifer system across much of the site. Consequent-
ly, there exists a natural vertical hydraulic gradient that is much
greater than the shallow horizontal gradient, and the contaminants
could readily migrate from the surficial to the intermediate aquifer
system, especially at those locations where sinkholes, paleo-stream
channels, or more permeable confining unit lithologies provide better
hydraulic connection. This potential for downward migration would
have been particularly strong prior to the cessation of site opera-
tions in January 1980 as a result of the drawdown response in these
3-55
'ecvc'-dodoer ,,,,., ,„„, ,mir,.,
-------
systems to the presumably high pumpage at the plant well (DW-01).
This postulation is based on the fact that a pump test conducted by
the U.S. Geological Survey on October 26-27, 1983, indicated that all
three aquifer systems exhibit a drawdown response to pumpage of a well
open to the Floridan aquifer system. The results of this pump test
are presented in the FDER-RI.
Water level elevations in the Floridan aquifer system (Figure
3-18) are more than 20 feet lower than those.of the overlying inter-
mediate aquifer system. This large vertical hydraulic gradient would
certainly support downward migration of contaminants into the upper
part of the Floridan aquifer system, especially where confinement is
less effective (I.e., due to breaching by sinkholes or changes in con-
fining unit lithology). Pumping of well DW-01 prior to January 1980
would not only have enhanced this downward migration potential, but
also would have provided a mechanism for the transport of contaminants
deeper into the aquifer system.
The current sampling program indicated much higher on-site con-
centrations of lead in groundwater from the Floridan aquifer system
than were found during the 1983 FDER sampling effort (see Figure
3-21). It would appear that whereas in 1983 only a dilute contaminant
front had penetrated to the screened interval depths of the monitoring
wells open to this system, by the time of the 1985 sampling an
undilute contaminant front had penetrated to these depths. However,
the mechanism for creating this strong downward dispersion in the
absence of on-site pumpage is not clear. It seems probable that com-
plex hydrogeochemical interactions associated with changes in ground-
water and aquifer matrix chemistry induced by penetration of the con-
taminant front (e.g., the lower pH values discussed previously) have
had the effect of creating an enhanced downward dispersion component.
Comparison of Figures 3-16 through 3-18 with Figures 3-19" through
3-21 reveals the close correlation between the distribution pattern of
lead concentrations and the general direction of groundwater flow
within each aquifer system. In accordance with the respective flow
systems, the contaminant front is generally migrating east-southeast
in the surficial aquifer system, south-southwest in the intermediate
aquifer system, and east in the Floridan aquifer system. The
3-56
-------
southwesterly component of contaminant front migration in the inter-
mediate aquifer system is of particular significance because of the
potential for eventual contamination of the Floridan aquifer system
west and southwest of the site via downward leakage.
The following section presents the results of a computer simula-
tion of contaminant front migration within each of the three on-site
aquifer systems.
3-57
recycled paper „, „,,,)
-------
3.5 COMPUTER SIMULATION OF CONTAMINANT FRONT MIGRATION
3.5.1 Description of Models
The results of the groundwater investigation reported in Section
3.4 showed that each of the on-site aquifer systems was subject to
high levels of lead contamination at specific locations. The areas of
greatest groundwater contamination were generally associated with
areas of highest soil contamination. Furthermore, the contaminant
front seemed to be migrating in the direction of groundwater flow
indicated by the potentiometric maps (Figures 3-16 through 3-18).
Consequently, groundwater flow and solute transport models were
applied to each of the three aquifer systems to simulate the migration
of the contaminant front over time. Input data for these models were
limited to the 44-well monitoring network. Residential wells were not
included because of the distance of each from the site and the detail
needed to illustrate the required contaminant isopleths. It was not
necessary to apply an overly sophisticated groundwater flow model to
the site because a water level data base had been developed in the
field. A simple flow model based on Darcy's Law was applied to this
data base in order to convert the groundwater heads to a groundwater
velocity field.
The finite element solute transport model used for the simulation
of contaminant front migration for all aquifers is known as FEMWASTE
and was developed by Oak Ridge National Laboratory (Yeh 1981) and
recommended by EPA (1985). For a comparison and check of the finite
element model, the Floridan Aquifer lead plume was also modeled and
simulations performed using a simplified Random-Walk (Prickett, et^
a!., 1981) solute transport finite difference model. The Random-Walk
model prediction was further used to predict the general effect of
pumping the Floridan Aquifer for remedial purposes.
3.5.1.1 FEMWASTE Model for All Aquifers at the Sapp Battery Site
Figure 3-23 shows the 120-node, 99-element FEMWASTE finite ele-
ment grid system that was developed for the Sapp Battery site. As can
be seen from the figure, this grid system was developed so that almost
all of the on-site monitoring wells occur as nodal points. It should
be understood that each aquifer was modeled separately, and three-
dimensional techniques were not employed. For each aquifer system,
3-58
-------
OJ
I
Ul
O 10
20O
SCALE
4OO
60O
BOO FCET
O1O fiO
1OO 15O
2OO METERS
Figure3-23 FEMWASTE ELEMENT GRID SYSTEM FOR ALL THREE AQUIFERS
AT THE SAPP BATTERY SITE
-------
the nodal points associated with monitoring wells that exhibited the
highest levels of groundwater contamination were chosen to represent
source areas for the contaminant plume. For instance, for the
Floridan aquifer simulation, monitoring wells DW-1, DW-2, MW-1A,
MW-3A, and MW-14A were considered source points.
3.5.1.2 Random-Walk Model for the Floridan Aquifer at the Sapp
Battery Site
Figure 3-24 displays the Random-Walk finite difference grid sys-
tem which was used for the Floridan Aquifer at the Sapp battery site.
As illustrated, nine columns lie along the "x" axis (East-West), and
eight rows along the "y" axis (North-South). Hence, a total of 72
cells exist for this simulation. The distance between each cell is
200 feet. The contaminant source positions for this model were
assumed to be two rectangular areas which covered: 1) the pond and
synthetic liner vicinity south of the foundation, and 2) the northwest
landfill location. The contamination mass for this model was calcu-
lated based on the average existing lead concentrations of Floridan
Aquifer monitoring wells DW-1, DW-2, MW-1A, MW-3A, and MW-14A.
3.5.1.3 Model Parameters
The model parameters listed in Table 3-2 were used in the com-
puter simulations. Lead was chosen as the chemical parameter to be
simulated in the solute transport model because the analytical results
of the groundwater sampling effort clearly indicate that the lead con-
centration distribution within each aquifer system most closely
parallels the groundwater flow pattern. In addition, lead is the con-
taminant of most concern at this site (Sections 3.4.2 and 3.4.3). For
this same reason, a low retardation factor of 1 and a first-order
decay constant of 0 for lead was assumed. Although lead is probably
being adsorbed onto the aquifer matrices to some extent, this effect
is believed to be sufficiently small as to not significantly affect
the simulation. A porosity of 0.3 was assumed for each aquifer sys-
tem, the values for the coefficients of longitudinal and traverse dis-
persivity were obtained from available literature, and the hydraulic
conductivities were based on field measurements carried out by FDER
(Watts 1984) and E & E's current groundwater investigation. Finally,
3-60
-------
Table 3-2
MODEL PARAMETERS
USED IN COMPUTER PROGRAM
Lead retardation factor 1
First-order decay constant 0
Porosity 0.3
Longitudinal dispersivity 205 ft
Transverse dispersivity 0
Hydraulic conductivity
a Surficial aquifer system 0.283 ft/day
a Intermediate aquifer system 0.072 ft/day
a Flondan aquifer system 14.4 ft/day
Starting date 1985
3-62
-------
s
o
a.
13
-------
OJ
I
cr>
o too
SCALE
BOO
SO
100
150
2OO
1OOOFEET
260 METERS
Figure 3-25 COMPUTED LEAD PLUME. 1 YEAR PREDICTION (1986)
SURFICIAL AQUIFER (FEMWASTE)
-------
the starting date of 1985 for the computer simulation of solute trans-
port was selected because the finite element model considers that
monitoring wells with the highest levels of contamination represent
source areas, and the most current data was collected in 1985. Once
the 1985 data were entered into the models, the present simulation was
reviewed and calibrated to achieve the best resemblance to the outer-
most monitoring wells, i.e., MW-05A, 05B; MW-06A, 06B; MW-08B; MW-21A,
218; and MW-22A, 22B. Although node points do not exist for residen-
tial wells, the data from the residential well samples were taken into
consideration when the model was calibrated. From the best fit 1985
models, 1- and 5-year (1986 and 1990) lead contaminant plume predic-
tions were performed. In addition, a 5- and 10-year (1990 and 1995)
prediction was conducted with the Random-Walk simulation of the
•
Floridan aquifer.
3.5.2 Simulation Results
3.5.2.1 FEMWASTE Model Predictions for all Aquifers
The groundwater velocity fields generated by the model indicate
that the groundwater flow rate is very low within the surficial and
intermediate aquifer systems (0.5 to 4.0 ft/year in both), whereas it
is much higher (10 to 70 ft/year) within the Floridan aquifer system.
This difference in flow velocity between the shallow and deep aquifer
systems is reflected in the predicted positions of the contaminant
fronts within each aquifer system (Figures 3-25 through 3-30). The
position of the 500-ppb lead contour for the surficial and inter-
mediate systems represents only slight migration of the contaminant
front toward the southeast and southwest, respectively. This is
amplified by the fact that only a very slight change in the size of
the 500-ppb contour exists between the 1- and 5-year prediction maps.
The position configuration of the 500-ppb lead contour in the Floridan
system indicates a large degree of front migration toward the east,
increasing significantly from the 1-year to the 5-year prediction.
Furthermore, the 5-year simulation for the Floridan system shows the
10-ppb lead contour as still on-site (Figure 3-30). However, the
analytical results for the residential well samples east of the site
(Section 3.4.2) indicate that this contour has already moved off-site.
This discrepancy most likely reflects the fact that the values of the
3-63
paper r. i.l
-------
CO
I
en
o too
SCALE
6QO
10OO FEET
50
IOO
150
3OO
250 METERS
Figure 3-27 COMPUTED LEAD PLUME. 1 YEAR PREDICTION (1986)
FLORIDAN AQUIFER (FEMWASTE)
-------
OJ
I
en
en
100
SCALE
!>OO
10OO FEET
60
100
160
3OO
2SO METERS
Figure 3-26 COMPUTED LEAD PLUME, 1 YEAR PREDICTION (1986)
INTERMEDIATE AQUIFER cMWASTE)
-------
CO
I
CD
0 10O
SCALE
5OO
1000 FEET
50
100
150
2OO
2SO METERS
Figure 3-29 COMPUTED LEAD PLUME. 5 YEAR PREDICTION (1990)
INTERMEDIATE AQUIFER (FEMWASTE)
-------
100
SCALE
500
1000 FEET
60
100
ISO
200
250 METERS
Figure 3-28 COMPUTED LEAD PLUME. 5 YEAR PREDICTION (1990)
SURFICIAL AQUIFER (FEMWASTE)
-------
hydrologic parameters used in the model are somewhat conservative, in
that they do not fully account for the secondary permeability
characteristics of the karstic terrain. . Consequently, it could be
hypothesized that the 500-ppb lead contour for the Floridan aquifer
system would also exist slightly further to the east in five years
than is indicated by Figure 3-30.
3.5.2.2 Random-Walk Model Predictions for the Floridan Aquifer
Figures 3-31 and 3-32 show the Random-Walk prediction for the
lead plume configuration in 1990 and 1995. In general, the Random-
Walk predictions have a similar trend to that of the FEMWASTE predic-
tions discussed earlier. This is based on the fact that other models
show the plume extending toward the east, south, and west. The con- .
tamination front appears to be most significant in the southerly
direction. The actual concentration limits, however, of the Random-
Walk predictions are much greater than those of the FEMWASTE model.
For example, in 1990, the 10-ppb isopleth of the FEMWASTE simulation
is at the same general position as the 50-ppb isopleth in the Random-
Walk prediction. Based on the existing data for the surrounding resi-
dential wells, it appears that the Random-Walk prediction is more in
line with actual future plume migration. The 1995 Random-Walk predic-
tion shows additional spreading of the lead plume to the point that
the 50-ppb isopleth is off the base map except in the northeast quad-
rant. Therefore, based on these estimates and assuming that the site
soils (or source) are not treated, the nearby surrounding residential
wells are most likely to have lead concentrations in excess of 50 ppb
by 1995.
3.5.3 Random-Walk Model Prediction of Various Floridan Aquifer
Pumping and Treatment Schemes
Six different scenarios were used to make a Random-Walk predic-
tion of the effects of pumping and treating the Floridan Aquifer in
the Sapp Battery site vicinity. These essentially include pumping the
Floridan Aquifer at 1 million, 0.5 million, and 0.25 million gallons
per day (mgpd) and either injecting that water back into the Floridan
system downgradient of the site or discharging directly to a local
surface drainage point.
3-70
-------
I
o\
o 100
SCALE
BOO
1OOO FEET
50
100
ISO
200
250 METERS
Figure 3-30 COMPUTED LEAD PLUME. 5 YEAR PREDICTION (1990)
FLORIDAN AQUIFER (FEMWASTE)
-------
CO
I
MODEL COLUMN NUMBERS
3 466
O SO
200
SCALE
4OO
6OO
800 FEET
010 50
1OO
15O
2OO METERS
Figure 3-32 COMPUTED LEAD PLUME. 10 YEAR PREDICTION (1995)
FLORIDAN AQUIFEP 'RANDOM-WALK)
-------
MODEL COLUMN NUMBERS
4 6
CO
a 50
200
SCALE
400
600
BOO FEET
O1O SO
1OO
ISO
20O METERS
Figure 3-31 COMPUTED LEAD °' UME, 5 YEAR PREDICTION (1990)
FLORIDAN AOUI (RANDOM-WALK)
-------
Table 3-3
VARIOUS RANDOM-WALK MODEL PREDICTIONS FOR PUMPING
AND TREATING THE FLORIDAN AQUIFER AT THE SAPP BATTERY SITE
Pimping Well Concentration
After Source Sipped (ppb)
Sceneno
1A
1B
2A
2B
3A
3B
Puip ing
Rate*
1
1
0.5
0.5
0.25
0.25
Injection
Rate*
0
1
0
0.5
0
0.25
Surface
Discharge
Rate*
1
0
0.5
0
0.25
0
1 year
(1988)
A37
423
570
588
730
672
5 year
(1992)
32
35
135
129
308
241
10 year
(1997)
— _
—
3
5
51
72
*MGPD = Million gallons per day
3-74
ir>it.rtit i
-------
The interrelationships between the shallow and intermediate
aquifer systems and between groundwater and surface water were not
modeled. This would require three-dimensional modeling, which was
beyond the scope of this study. Furthermore, the complexity of the
vertical aquifer system, due to factors such as sinkholes and karstic
features, is too great to be modeled with reasonable confidence, even
using three-dimensional models.
Table 3-3 lists the prediction results for the various pumping
rates at 1, 5, and 10 years. This format assumes that the contamina-
tion source will be stopped by 1987 through soil and sediment remedia-
tion.
In general the data on Table 3-3 show that pumping at 1 mgpd with
either injection or surface water discharge would clean the aquifer to
below drinking water standards in less than 5 years. However, at such
a large pumping rate, the concentration of the contaminant begins at
423 to 437 ppb lead and decreases with time. Thus, an extremely large
treatment method with the ability to effectively clean less than 500
ppb would be needed. At 0.25 mgpd, on the other hand, the pumping
well lead concentration increases because it is not being diluted by
clean aquifer water from the surrounding area. However, an additional
5 years (1997) is needed to get close to present day drinking water
standards.
3-73
-------
number, date, sample number, parameters to be analyzed for, and pres-
ervation media. Before the samples were packed in a cooler for ship-
ment to E & E's laboratory, they were photographed and the sample num-
ber, location, date and time of collection, parameters to be analyzed
for each sample, and any comments were entered onto a chain-of-
custody form. One copy of this form was included in the sample
cooler, and a second copy was filed in the Tallahassee office. All
data recorded in the sample log, on sample identification tags, and on
chain-of-custody forms were written in ink.
4.1.2 Samples
During sampling, field QA/QC was conducted in accordance with
standard operating procedures. These procedures, outlined in E & E's
Quality Assurance/Quality Control Procedures Manual, were developed in
accordance with EPA standards. The QA/QC samples consisted of sample
duplicates, sampling equipment rinsates, and trip bottle blanks.
Tables 4-1 through 4-5 present a complete list of the QA/QC sample
analysis requirements. Appendix F includes all QA/QC sample results
under separate cover.
Sample duplicates were selected randomly. One sample duplicate
was taken for approximately every 10 samples. Duplicates of samples
to be archived were not collected. Duplicate samples are gathered as
a check for homogeniety of the sample medium and are not an indication
of the consistency of laboratory analyses. Soil and sediment dupli-
cate samples showed some wide variations for lead but the majority did
not exceed an order of magnitude difference. Accessory metals such as
antimony and cadmium show good correlations where they were detected.
Typically, soil metal duplicates show more deviation than other media.
This is attributed to the fact that: contaminants are not isotropi-
cally dispersed in soil, especially hard clays; and physical homogeni-
zation Is more difficult. If, for example, a duplicate sample con-
tained more clay, a higher percentage of metals would occur due to the
increased medium for adsorption. As the majority of soil samples at
Sapp Battery were clayey, these trends were reflected by metal varia-
tions between the original and duplicate samples.
Sampling equipment was decontaminated after each sample was taken
(see Section 2). To evaluate the effectiveness of the equipment
4-2
-------
4. QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL
4.1 FIELDWORK
4.1.1 Documentation
Daily logs and data forms were kept in sufficient detail to
enable reconstruction of the events that occurred during the project.
This information was also kept to refresh the memory of field per-
sonnel if called on to give testimony during legal proceedings.
Daily logs (site, task, and individual) were kept in bound,
waterproof notebooks with numbered pages. Entries were made in water-
proof ink, dated, and signed. Corrections were made by crossing a
line through the error and entering the corrected information. All
corrections were initialed and dated by the person making the change.
The site log was the responsibility of the site team leader and
included the daily log of on-site activities.
A summary of task log inclusions is provided in the Quality
Assurance Project Plan (QAPP), Feasibility Study for Sapp Battery
site, Jackson County, Florida, November 1985, p. 5-29.
Photographs are the most accurate record of field observations
and are crucial to validating actual field situations. Information
noted in the field notebook concerning photographs can be found in the
QAPP for the Sapp Battery site, p. 5-30.
Sample log books were used to record: specific sample station
numbers, date and time the sample was taken, sample location, param-
eters to be analyzed for, and any comments.
Samples were placed in the appropriate sample jars with appro-
priate sample identification labels. These labels included the job
4-1
-------
Table 4-3
MONITORING WELL QA/QC SAMPLE ANALYSIS REQUIREMENTS
Required
Samples
Duplicates
Sampling
Equipment
Rinaates
Trip
Bottle
Blanks
Total
Analyses
55 pH, lead, cadmium,
antimony, aluminum,
arsenic, manganese,
selenium
6 Priority pollutant
organics, priority pol-
lutant metals, acid/
base neutral extract -
ables, pesticides, sul-
fate, cyanide
Table 4-4
RESIDENTIAL WELL QA/QC SAMPLE ANALYSIS REQUIREMENTS
Requi red
Samples
Duplicates
Sampling
Equipment
Rinsatea
Trip
Bottle
Blanks
Total
Analyses
25
27 pH, lead, aluminum,
cadmium, antimony,
arsenic, manganese,
nickel, selenium
1 Priority pollutant
organics, priority pol-
lutant metals, acid/
base neutral extract-
ables, pesticides, sul-
fate, cyanide
Table 4-5
SURFACE WATER QA/QC SAMPLE ANALYSIS REQUIREMENTS
Required
Samplea
Duplicates
Sampling
Equipment
Rinsates
Trip
Bottle
Blanks
Total
Analyses
Priority pollutant
organics, priority pol-
lutant metals, acid/
base neutral extract -
ables, pesticides, sul-
fate, cyanide
4-4
ace-
-------
Table 4-1
SOIL QA/QC SAMPLE ANALYSIS REQUIREMENTS
Required
Samples
Duplicates
Sampling Trip
Equipment Bottle
Rinsatea Blanks
Total
Analyses
145
108
11
14
159 pH, lead, 5 moisture
134 pH, lead, cadmium,
antimony, S moisture
8 Priority pollutant
organic*, priority pol-
lutant metals, acid/
base neutral extract-
ables, pesticides, sul-
fate, cyanide
Table 4-2
SEDIMENT QA/QC SAMPLE ANALYSIS REQUIREMENTS
Required
Samples
Sampling
Equipment
Duplicates Rinsates
Trip
Bottle
Blanks Total Analyses
81
5
9
0
a
o
99 pH, lead, cadmium,
antimony, S moisture
5 Priority pollutant
metals, priority pol-
lutant organics, acid/
base neutral extract-
ables, pesticides, sul-
fats, cyanide
4-3
-------
(7.12 ppm). Given that the background lead level for the Sapp Battery
area is considered to be about 30 ppm, whereas contaminated sample
concentrations are, at a minimum, an order of magnitude higher, even
this relatively high rinsate lead concentration would have little
effect on the analytical results for the soil samples. It is probable
that lead was inadvertently introduced in particulate form during
collection of this rinsate sample. In contrast, the lead values of
1.48 and 1.77 ppm in rinsate samples FSR04 and FSR07, respectively,
are most likely the result of airborne dust particles contaminating
the equipment after the decontamination and during rinsate sample
collection. Antimony and cadmium values were below detection limits
(.06 and .005, respectively) for all rinsate samples except FSR07,
which showed cadmium at 0.007 ppm. Again, this can be attributed to
contamination by aeolian particles during collection of the rinsate
sample.
Most of the eight sediment sampling equipment rinsates samples
exhibited lead concentrations below detection limits. The low levels
in FSR15 (1.95 ppm) and FSR18 (0.036 ppm) can again be attributed to
airborne contamination of the equipment.
Of the six groundwater rinsate samples, only GWR02 and GWR04
showed lead concentrations (0.028 ppm) above the detection limits.
These values are also attributed to airborne contamination.
Parameters noted in the field during sampling (pH, conductivity,
temperature, color, and texture) were recorded by sampling personnel
and filed at the end of each day. Meters used in the field were
subject to regular maintenance and calibration. Calibration and main-
tenance data were also recorded and filed.
Further information on QA/QC requirements and procedures is given
on pp. 5-18 through 5-20 of the QAPP for the Sapp Battery site
(November 1985).
4-6
'•?:•«:>ec race-
-------
decontamination procedure, sampling equipment rinsate samples were
taken. After the equipment had been subjected to the usual decontami-
nation procedure, distilled water was poured over or through it and
collected for analysis. One rinsate sample was generally taken for
each day of sampling. However, on days when only a very few samples
were taken, collection of a rinsate sample was omitted.
For every lot of bottles used to collect samples, an empty bottle
(trip bottle blank) was carried into the field during sampling and
then shipped to the laboratory for analysis. The purpose of the trip
bottle blank is to certify that the bottles were not contaminated
during handling on-site. To ensure that the distilled water used in
the decontamination of sampling equipment, which was purchased from
local grocery and drug stores, was not contaminated,* four of the trip
bottle blank bottles (two soil/sediment and two water) were filled
with this water. Both the soil/sediment (SBB01-07) and groundwater
(GBB02, 03) bottle blanks exhibited metal concentrations below detec-
tion limits. Soil blank SBB01 showed 9 ug/1 acetone; 4 ug/1 1,1,1-
trichloroethane; and 7 ug/1 methexene chloride upon analysis for
priority pollutant volatile organics. However, these compounds were
noted as being present in the corresponding instrument blanks only
slightly above the 3 ug/1 detection limit. As a result, all nine
bottle blanks were intrinsically clean.
Water for on-site use was obtained from the supply well at the
Alford Fire House, located approximately 2 miles south-southeast of
the site in the Town of Alford (GW-29; Figure 2-6). A sample of this
water was analyzed and found to contain 0.023 ppm lead, the highest
concentration detected in an off-site residential well. The results
of the groundwater Investigation strongly suggest that contamination
of this well must be attributed to some unknown source rather than the
Sapp Battery site. A second Alford Fire House sample was collected
and analyzed to confirm these data. The results indicated 0.013 ppm
lead. It is also unlikely that the presence of this lead had any
significant effect on the analytical results of the investigation,
given that all sampling equipment was rinsed with distilled water
before re-use.
Of the 10 soil sampling equipment rinsate samples that were col-
lected and analyzed, FSR06 exhibited the highest lead concentration
4-5
-------
quantity of surrogate and internal standard compounds is added. The
organic volatile compounds, including surrogate and internal stan-
dards, are purged from solution in a stream of inert gas and trapped
from vapor on a suitable material. The trap tube is then heated, and
the trapped materials desorbed by backflushing into a gas chromato-
graph under standard conditions. Eluting peaks enter a mass spec-
trometer. Individual components are identified by mass spectrum and
quantified by primary ion ratio to that of the internal standard.
Semi-volatile Compounds. Soil or water aliquots, to which a
measured quantity of surrogate compounds has been added, are extracted
into methylene chloride. Water samples are extracted twice: once at
pH 12 for extraction of basic and neutral components, and once at pH 2
*
for extraction of acidic components (mainly phenols). Soil samples
are extracted once using a sonication apparatus. Extracts (combined
if necessary) are spiked with internal standard solution and analyzed
by 6C/MS. Peaks are identified and quantified as for volatile com-
pounds.
Pesticides and PCBs. Soil or water samples to which a surrogate
standard has been added are extracted into methylene chloride. The
extract is exchanged into hexane and cleaned up by column chromato-
graphy. The extract is then analyzed by gas chromatography/electron
capture detector by external standard procedures.
4.2.1.2 Metals Analyses
The following summary of analytical methods for metals analysis
is taken from E & E's Standard Operating Procedures Manual. Either
inductively-coupled argon plasma spectroscopy (ICP) or atomic absorp-
tion spectrophotometry was used as appropriate to meet contract re-
quired detection limits. Table 4-6 summarizes metal detection limits
and methods used to analyze sample digestates.
Sample digestion procedures depend on the matrix, the method of
analysis used, and the metal being analyzed. These are summarized
below.
4-8
-------
4.2 LABORATORY SAMPLE ANALYSIS
Samples of groundwater, well water, surface water, soils, and
sediments were analyzed for metals and organics using analytical
methods promulgated by EPA for use on CERCLA (or Superfund) investiga-
tions. These procedures are described generally in Section 4.2.1
below.
Samples were analyzed by E & E's laboratory in Buffalo, New York,
and by Environmental Protection Systems, Inc., (EPS) in Pensacola,
Florida. Both laboratories are approved by FOER for the analyses they
conducted. The E & E laboratory is contracted to EPA to provide
organics analysis for the Superfund program, and laboratory personnel
are thoroughly familiar with the analytical and reporting requirements
of that program. EPS is currently seeking certification by EPA to
participate in the organics analysis portion of the Superfund program.
Both E & E and EPS results were subject to quality assurance (QA)
review by E & E's independent staff of QA chemists. Neither labora-
tory was aware of sample designations as duplicates or blanks at the
time of analysis.
4.2.1 Analytical Methods
Samples were analyzed by EPA Contract Laboratory protocols. Full
details are provided in the following references:
o Statement of Work for Organics Analysis, Multimedia, Multi-
concentration, EPA Contract Laboratory Program, revised July
1985.
o Statement of Work for Inorganics Analysis, Multimedia, Multi-
concentration, EPA Contract Laboratory Program, revised August
1985.
The analytical methods are briefly described below.
4.2.1.1 Organic Analyses
Volatile Compounds. Soil or water aliquots are introduced to
the purge tube of a purge-and-trap apparatus. A precisely measured
4-7
-------
o For water samples analyzed by furnace atomic absorption (FAA)
for arsenic, cadmium, lead, selenium, and thallium:
Shake the sample, and transfer 100 ml to a 250-mL beaker. Add
1 ml 50% HN03 and 2 ml 30* H202. Cover with a watch
glass and heat for 2 hours at 95*C, making sure the sample
does not boil. Cool the sample and filter it, and bring back
to 100 ml with reagent water. The sample is now ready for
analysis.
o For water samples analyzed by ICP, and FAA analysis for
antimony:
Shake the sample and transfer 100 ml to a 250-mL beaker. Add
2 ml 50* HN03 and 10 ml 50% HC1. Heat on a steam bath or
hot plate until the volume has been reduced to 25% to 50% of
the original volume, without boiling. Cool the sample and
filter it, and bring, it back to 100 ml with reagent water.
The sample is now ready for analysis.
o For water samples analyzed for mercury, using cold vapor
atomic absorption spectrophotometry (CVAA):
Shake the sample and transfer 100 ml to a 300-mL BOD bottle.
Add 5 ml 0.5N ^$04 and mix. Add 2.5 ml concentrated
nitric acid and mix. Add 15 ml 5% potassium permanganate
solution, or more if the purple color discharges. Add 8 ml 5%
potassium persulfate solution, and heat the bottle to 95*C for
two hours 1n a water bath. At the end of the digestion
period, cool and add 6 ml of 12% sodium chloride/hydroxylamine
sulfate solution to reduce excess permanganate. Wait at least
30 seconds, then add 5 ml stannous sulfate and immediately
analyze.
o For sediment samples analyzed for all metals except mercury:
4-10
•ecvciec z'ase-
-------
Table 4-6
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT-REQUIRED DETECTION LIMITS
Element
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thalliui
Vanadium
Zinc
Cyanide
CROC
Soil
(ntg/kg)
—
12
2
~
1
1
—
2
—
5
—
1
—
—
0.04
8
—
1
2
—
2
—
4
25
CROL
Water
(ug/1)
200
60
10
200
5
5
5,000
10
50
25
100
5
5,000
15
0.2
40
5,000
5
10
5,000
10
50
20
10
Methods
(soil and
water)
ICP
FAA
FAA
ICP
ICP
FAA
ICP
ICP
ICP
ICP
ICP
FAA
ICP
ICP
CVAA
ICP
ICP
FAA
ICP
ICP
FAA
ICP
ICP
Color
Note: COLs are beat achievable and will vary according to
concentration and variations in the respective matrix.
ICP = inductively-coupled plasma apecroscopy
FAA : furnace atomic absorption spectrophotometry
CVAA = cold vapor atomic absorption spectrophotometry
4-9
-------
minutes. Cool and add 6 ml 12% sodium chloride/hydroxylamine
sulfate solution to reduce the excess permanganate. Add 55 ml
reagent water. Add 5 ml stannous sulfate (6.3) and immed-
iately analyze.
o For percent solids—soils, sediments, sludges:
Transfer a representative portion of the sample to a tared
weighing dish. Weigh and record weight. Place dish, sample,
and tilted cover in drying oven at 103* to 105"C. Cool sample
in desiccator and weigh. Repeat process until constant weight
is attained. Record each weight, and calculate percent
solids. Do not analyze sample.
Sample digestates were analyzed by ICP, FAA, or CVAA as indicated
on Table 4-6. The following QA/QC was performed: initial calibration
and calibration verification, continuing calibration verification,
preparation blank analysis, interference check sample analysis, ICP
serial dilution analysis, matrix spike analysis, duplicate sample
analysis, furnace AA QC analysis, and laboratory QC sample analysis.
Sediment, soil, and sludge samples were also analyzed for moisture
content, and metals content will be reported on a dry-weight basis.
It is permissible to use ICP procedures for analysis when the
CRDL cannot be met, provided that the actual sample level is at least
twice the detection limit for the ICP analysis. As an example, for
lead in water: CRDL is 5 ug/L; ICP detection limit is 40 ug/L; sample
value is 90 ug/L. If the sample is less than 80 ug/L, it must be
analyzed by FAA.
4.2.2 Reporting and Quality Assurance
Reporting procedures for this project were as required: either a
simple data tabulation, or a full-scale CLP data package was prepared
according to the procedures in the relevant statements of work. In
each case, the report included details on QA/QC procedures and re-
sults. All data are submitted in the Appendix of this summary docu-
ment. Duplicate and blank samples from the field were submitted blind
4-12
-------
Add 1.0 g homogenized sample to a conical beaker. Add 10 ml
50% HN03, mix and cover with a watch glass. Reflux the
sample at 95*C for 10 minutes. Allow the sample to cool, and
then add 5 ml concentrated nitric acid and reflux for 30 min-
utes. Do not allow total volume to be reduced to less than
5 ml_. Again cool the sample, and add 2 ml reagent water and
3 ml 30% H202. Warm gently until effervescence begins,
and then wait until it subsides. Cool the beaker. Continue
to add 30% H202 in 1 ml aliquots until either there is no
further effervescence, or until a total of 10 ml has been
added. Then:
For ICP analysis; and FAA analysis for antimony:
Add 5 ml 50% HC1 and 10 ml reagent water. Return the covered
beaker to the hot plate and heat for an additional ten min-
utes. After cooling, filter through a Whatman #42 filter and
dilute the digestate to 100 ml with reagent water. Dilute the
digestate 1:1 (200 mL final volume) with reagent water.
For FAA analysis of arsenic, cadmium, lead, selenium, and
thallium:
Do not add the reagents specified above. Rather, continue
heating the digestate until the volume has been reduced to
about 2 ml. Then add 10 ml reagent water and warm the mix-
ture. Cool and filter through a Whatman #42 filter paper, and
dilute to 100 ml with reagent water. Dilute the digestate 1:1
(200 ml final volume) with reagant water.
o For sediment samples analyzed for mercury:
Weigh 0.2 g sample into a BOD bottle. Add 5 ml 0.5N H2S04
and 2.5 ml concentrated nitric acid. Heat for two minutes at
95*C in a water bath. Cool, add 50 mL reagent water, 15 ml
5% potassium permanganate solution, and 8 mL 5% potassium
persulfate solution. Mix thoroughly and heat to 95*C for 30
4-11
-------
4.2.3 Analytical Quality Assurance Results and Discussions
USEPA Contract Laboratory Program (CLP) procedures were used to
analyze all samples where applicable. These analytical procedures
include a specified level of QC analyses, and limits to which such
analyses should conform. In addition, E & E's own QA/QC procedures
were superimposed where necessary onto CLP QA/QC procedures to provide
an added level of assurance.
4.2.3.1 Organic Analyses
For organic analyses by GC/MS, the CLP-required QA/QC procedures
.can be summarized as follows:
o Instrument calibration at five concentration levels;
o Daily certification of instrument tune;
o Daily verification of initial five-point calibration;
o For each sample, verification of extraction and analysis
recovery through use of surrogate standards;
o For each sample, quantification of found contaminants and
surrogate compounds by internal standard procedure;
o For each found contaminant, examination of the mass spectrum
against a laboratory-generated standard mass spectrum to
verify identification;
o For each batch of samples, analysis of two sample aliquots
identically spiked with specified compounds for precision and
accuracy assurance; and,
o For specified samples in this project, reporting in standard
format all samples, quality control samples, quality control
summaries, calibration information, and mass spectra.
4-14
-------
to the laboratories for analysis. For this project, in general, there
was-good agreement between field duplicate samples, and negligible
contamination of blanks. This confirms that field procedures were
well in control, and that laboratory performance was of the required
standard. In addition, the laboratory added to the sample batch
spiked samples, replicates, standards, and method blanks at a fre-
quency specified in the statements of works in order to provide con-
tinuing and real-time information on data quality. All percent dif-
ferences were within the 95% confidence intervals and fell within EPA
guidelines. The spike sample provided by the EPA (EPA-1) was clean
for all parameters. For organic analyses, surrogate recoveries must
be within specified limits for the extraction and analysis to be con-
sidered valid. All percent recoveries for spiked organic samples were
well within ranges specified in EPA CLP protocols. Percent recoveries
of less than 50t for pentachlorophenol (36X) and 4-nitrophenol (28t)
(Appendix 8) were normal for these compounds, the acceptable range
being between 10 and 100 percent. This wide range reflects the
inherent difficulty in recovery of these compounds under standard
laboratory analyses. All furnance atomic absorption samples are
spiked at least once with a specified level of analyte to guard
against matrix interference. If recovery is not within the range of
85% to 115X, the method of standard addition must be employed.
Deviations from the standard detection limits as required by the
QA plan were a function of several variables. Method detection limits
reflect perfect conditions using clean samples for analyses. Because
these conditions do not usually exist, detection limits can vary from
the normal CDL value. Matrix effects can interfere with limits, as
they represent compounds existing within the analyzed medium that
behave in a similar manner to the compound of interest. As such, they
may interfere with absorption and make interpretation more difficult.
Similarly, high concentrations of a substance can limit the volume
used for analysis and may require subsequent dilution. This would
alter the detection limit as well.
4-13
-------
4.2.3.2 Inorganic Analyses
Metals analyses were conducted using atomic absorption spectro-
photometry (AAS) or inductively coupled argon plasma emission spectro-
photometry (ICP), as required under CLP protocols and as necessary to
achieve contract detection limits. CLP QA/QC requirements are
summarized below.
o Instruments must be calibrated initially at three levels (AAS)
or two levels (ICP). The calibration must be verified by
analysis of a solution independently prepared from alternate
stock standards.
o At the beginning and end of every analytical run, a linear
range verification standard must be run. This standard
defines the upper limit of the calibration range and analyses
beyond this range can not be reported. This standard must
read within 5« of true value. A low standard at twice the
Contract Required Detection Limit (CRDL) must read between IX
CRDL and 3X CRDL.
o A mid-range standard at the beginning and end of the analyti-
cal run, and at a frequency of 10% during the run, must read
with 10X of true value (20X for mercury).
o A preparation blank can not be digested for each batch of 20
samples and must show no more than CRDL of each metal.
o For ICP analysis, an Interference Check Sample (ICS) must be
run at the beginning and end of each analytical run. Results
for all included elements must agree to with +20% of true
value.
o One sample in each batch of 20 must be spiked before digestion
with all analytes of interest at specified levels. All spikes
must be recovered between 75% and 125X: for any analyte that
is not recovered within these limits, associated sample
results must be flagged with the letter R. An exception to
this rule is allowed when the native sample concentration is
4-16
-------
Twelve samples were analyzed for organic compounds as E i E job number
U-23'87 and reported with a full CLP-type data package on November 8,
1985. Quality control results are discussed below.
Surrogate recoveries were within CLP specified limits, with two
exceptions. Sample FRW-01 (E & E number 85-6629) showed toluene-08
recovery of 114% against an allowable range of 88% to 110%. No HSL
compounds were found in the volatile fraction of this sample, with the
exception of acetone, 2-butanone, and 1,1,1-trichloroethane, which
were attributed to laboratory contamination. The sample was not re-
analyzed, as the effect of the high recovery of toluene would be to
increase the apparent concentration of contaminant compounds. Sample
DSW-02 showed low recoveries of nitrobenzene-05 and 2-fluoro-biphenyl
surrogates in the semivolatile fraction. The sample was therefore
reextracted and reanalyzed and surrogate recoveries were as a whole
acceptable. (Nitrobenzene-05 was still low, at 34%, against a per-
mitted range of 35-114%, but CLP procedures allow one surrogate in the
semivolatiles fraction to be out of range.) Matrix spike analyses in
duplicate for all compounds were within CLP target values.
(1,1-dichloroethene was not used in the matrix spike solution for
volatiles, since at that time we were not able to obtain a pure
standard in an appropriate solvent from USEPA. This was noted in the
case narrative for this batch of samples.) Reagent blank analysis
results for organics were within allowable contamination limits, with
the exception of the result for 2-butanone (which we have attributed
to the concurrent building construction) in the volatiles samples.
GC/MS tuning met criteria in all instances. Calibration criteria for
both the five-point initial calibration and the daily single-point
verification were met, with one exception. Vinyl chloride exhibited a
percent difference of 27.5% (25% is allowable) between the initial
five- point mean response factor and the daily verification response
factor on 27 September 1985. This was noted in the case narrative and
it was determined that this discrepancy had no analytical
significance, since vinyl chloride was not detected in any sample.
Similar criteria and similar standards of performance to cri-
teria applied to all organic analyses conducted under this contract.
4-15
-------
Other samples analyzed and reported under this contract met simi-
lar criteria of quality.
4.2.3,3 Data Reporting
For a full QA analysis of data generated using the CLP protocols,
we recommend that a full data package to CLP specifications should be
required. This contains all supporting QA/QC and calibration informa-
tion, and facilitates proper assessment by FDER.
4-18
-------
four (or more) times the spike amount. In this case, sample
results need not be flagged.
o One sample in each batch of twenty must be analyzed in dupli-
cate. Relative percent difference (RPD) between these
analyses must be 20% or less where sample values are 5X CRDL
or more. If one or both sample values are less than 5X CRDL,
then the values must agree to within ^CRDL.
o Furnace AAS procedures require particular QC analyses. Each
sample will be injected in duplicate. In addition, each
sample digestate will also be spiked and analyzed similarly in
duplicate. Spike recovery must be in the range 85% to 115%,
or multiple standard addition (MSA) will be required for
quantification.
Samples analyzed for antimony, cadmium, and lead as E & E job number
U-2571 were analyzed and reported with a full CLP-type data package on
January 27, 1976. Quality control results are discussed below. Meth-
od blanks showed all three elements not detectable (i.e.,
-------
system by the Heavy Metals Task Force do not reveal any significant
trends that would indicate an influence from the Sapp Battery Site.
In general, there are three major areas of soil contamination at
the site extending to a depth of 10 feet: (1) along the west bank of
the West Swamp; (2) in the area immediately northeast of the plant
foundation; and (3) in the Northwest Landfill area.
The swamp sediments which exhibit contamination are primarily at
shallow depths in the southern portion of the West Swamp. In general,
lead concentrations in these sediments taper off to low levels toward
the northern West Swamp and East Swamp areas.
As a result of poor waste management practices, resulting in
soils contamination, and the complex hydrogeology at the site, ground-
water from the surficial, intermediate, and Floridan aquifer systems
shows varying degrees of lead pollution. In essence, the highest
groundwater contamination reflects the three contaminated soil areas
in the western half of the the site, identified above. Contamination
of the deeper aquifer results primarily from:
o Stratigraphic variations common to this region of Florida
(i.e., karst terrain and paleo-stream channels);
o A high vertical hydraulic gradient between the shallow and
deep aquifers; and
•o Historical on-site pumping of the Sapp Battery plant well.
In addition, lateral waste migration is enhanced by the fact that:
o The surficial aquifer flows generally in an eastward direction
at a very slow rate;
o The intermediate aquifer flows southwestward at a slow rate;
and
o The Floridan aquifer flows eastward at a relatively fast
rate.
5-2
-------
5. CONCLUSIONS
The results of this investigation as well as the results of pre-
vious investigations reveal significant lead contamination and the
presence of several trace metals in surface water, groundwater, sedi-
ment, and soil in the vicinity of the Sapp Battery site. This contam-
ination is the direct result of poor waste management practices by the
now-defunct Sapp Battery Company.
Surface water and surface water sediment samples selected by FSU
in the regional vicinity downgradient of the Sapp Battery site in
general show lead contamination which decreases substantially with
increased distance from the site, and decreases with time.
Biologic samples collected during the FSU investigation revealed
the following:
o Algae species showed no pattern in diversity or evenness;
o Macroinvertebrates commonly exhibited a gradient response to
the distribution of metals, and
o Fish species exhibited a gradient response to the contami-
nation distribution found in surface water and surface water
sediments.
Additional surface water, surface water sediment, and fish
samples collected from a sampling network within the Chipola River
5-1
-------
By inputting detailed physical and chemical data into a computer
model", the lead migration was simulated and predictions were made for
one and five years from the date of sample collection. The simula-
tion, in general, showed that the waste front is migrating very slowly
in the surficial and intermediate systems. However, because of the
high flow velocity within the Floridan aquifer, lead migration will
extend considerably farther to the east of the abandoned Sapp Battery
operation in excess of five years from the present time. Furthermore,
residential wells immediately east of the site are presently exhibit-
ing minor lead contamination effects. Although this simulation pro-
vides lead migration trends in the hydrogeologic regime, several
assumptions had to be applied, resulting only in a qualitative over-
view.
In addition to the lead migration predictions, simulations were
performed to determine how pumping would affect contamination in the
Floridan aquifer. The pumping simulations showed that the majority of
the contamination could be removed from the aquifer in about:
o
o
5 years at a pumping rate of 1 million gallons per day (mgd)
7 years at a pumping rate of 0.5 mgd, or
15 vears at a oumoina rate of 0.25 mad.
o 15 years at a pumping rate of 0.25 mgd
The concentrations of the simulated pumped water would in all cases be
less than 1 part per million lead at any given time.
A preliminary fixation study demonstrated that the transport of
lead from the soils into the groundwater may be mitigated by exca-
vating and solidifying the soils. Solidification of the soils with
defined quantities of Portland cement would reduce the levels of lead
in the leachate to below the detection level of 0.06 mg/L.
The data presented in this report, along with the results of the
earlier FDER RI, are in direct support of the feasibility study (FS).
These documents are intended to serve as the primary data base for the
FS report.
5-3
-------
Freeze, R.A., and J.A. Cherry, 1979, Groundwater, Prentice-Hall, Inc.,
-Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
Livingston, R.J., 1985, Field Verification of Bioassay Results at
Toxic Waste Sites in Three Southeastern Drainage Systems, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency Report, Research and Develop-
ment.
Moore, W.E., 1955, Geology of Jackson County, Florida, Florida Geo-
logical Survey Bulletin, 37, Tallahassee, Florida.
Morgan, D.S., J.I. Novoa, and A.H. Halff, 1984, Oil Sludge Solidifica-
tion Using Cement Kiln Dust, Journal of Environmental Engi-
neering, 110, 5.
NUS Corporation, 1983, Feasibility Study, Sapp Battery Site, Alfprd,
Florida, EPA Work Assignment No. 17-4M17, Contract No. 68-01-
OHM Co., 1984a, Summary of Soil Excavation, Final, Sapp Battery Haz-
ardous Waste Site.
OHM Co., 1984b, Summary Report, Technical Report, and Site-Specific
Information, Final, Sapp Battery Hazardous Waste Site.
Prickett, T.A., T.G. Nagmik, and C.L. Lunnquist, 1981, A "Random-Walk"
Solute Transport Model for Selected Groundwater Quality Evalua-
tions, Illinois State Water Survey, Bulletin 65.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, April 1985, Modeling Remedial
Actions at Uncontrolled Hazardous Waste Sites, EPA/540/
2-85/001.
U.S. Department of the Interior, February 23, 1983, Chipola River
Bioassay Data for Fish and Clams, to Forest Ware, Florida Fish
and Game Commission, from Waynin Johnson, Fish and Wildlife
Service.
U.S. Department of the Interior, May 22, 1985, Bioassay Data for Lead,
Cadmium, and Mercury in Fish Fillets from the Chipola and
Apolachicola River, 1983-1984, to Bruce Blachard, Director,
Environmental Project Review, from Glen Lucero, EPA.
Vernon, R.O., and H.S. Purl, 1964, Geologic Map of Florida, Florida
Geological Survey Map Series 18, May 1965, Tallahassee, Florida.
Watts, G.B., 1984, The Sapp Battery Site, Jackson County, Florida,
Remedial Investigation, Final Report: Groundwater Section,
Florida Department of Environmental Regulation, Tallahassee,
Florida.
Yeh, G.T., and D.A. Ward, 1981, FEMWASTE; A Finite-Element Model of
Waste Transport Through Saturated-Unsaturated Porous Media, Oak
Ridge National Laboratory Report No. 5601.
6-2
-------
6. BIBLIOGRAPHY
Bear, J., 1979, Hydraulics of Groundwater, McGraw-Hill, Inc., New
York, New York"!
Bouwer, H., and R.C. R1ce, 1976, A Slug Test for Determining Hydraulic
Conductivity of Unconfined Aquifers with Completely or Partially
Penetrating Wells, Water Resources Research, 12, 3:423-28.
Cooke, C.W., 1945, Geology of Florida, Florida Geological Survey Bul-
letin, 29, Tallahassee, Florida.
ESE, Inc., February 1984, Comprehensive Feasibility Study, Task I,
Remedial Response Objectives and Evaluation Criteria.
ESE, Inc., and OHM Co., June 1984, Initial Remedial Measures Program
at Sapp Battery Site, Soil Sampling and Analysis.
Fetter, C.W., Jr., 1980, Applied Hydrogeology, Charles E. Merrill
Publishing Company, Columbus, Ohio.
Florida Department of Environmental Regulation (FDER), March 30, 1983,
Interoffice Memorandum to Victoria J. Tschinkel, Secretary, from
Tom Savage, Water Quality Management Section.
Florida Department of Environmental Regulation (FDER), January 1984,
Final Report Sapp Battery Site Remedial Investigation.
Florida Department of Environmental Regulation (FDER), September 17,
1982, Interoffice Memorandum to Dr. R.H. Patten, Chemistry
Department Administrator, from Rosemary Bottcher, special
analytical laboratory (FDER).
Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services (DHRS),
November 14, 1983, Report to Victoria J. Tschinkel, Secretary,
FDER, from David H. Pingree, DHRS.
Franks, B.J., editor, 1982, Principal Aquifers in Florida, U.S. Geo-
logical Survey Water-Resources Investigations Open-File Report
82-255, Tallahassee, Florida.
6-1
-------
FM-2901 D1 170
a
SUMMARY REPORT ON THE
FIELD INVESTIGATION OF THE
SAPP BATTERY SITE,
JACKSON COUNTY, FLORIDA
VOLUME 2 - APPENDICES
November 1986
Prepared for:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION
2600 Blairstone Road
Tallahassee, Florida 32301
ecology and environment, inc.
195 SUGG ROAO. P.O. BOX 0, BUFFALO. NEW YORK 14225. TEL. 718-632-4491
International Specialists in the Environment
recycled paper
-------
FM-29Q1 01 170
/fev'j*
c/
SUMMARY REPORT ON THE
FIELD INVESTIGATION OF THE
SAPP BATTERY SITE,
JACKSON COUNTY, FLORIDA
VOLUME 2 - APPENDICES
November 1986
Prepared for:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION
2600 Blairstone Road
Tallahassee, Florida 32301
ecology and environment, inc.
195 SUGG ROAD. P.O. BOX 0, BUFFALO, NEW YORK 14225, TEL. 716432-4401
International Specialist! in tna Environment
recycled paper
-------
;.3 -
« -
•*« -
I able Mb lie i all m sed.i.ei.n ami w» taken lro« I he L.ltU Uiy
Creek-Dry Creek system ove .e sliidy period.
METALS REPORT
Metals: LD-DC Sediments - 65 Revised 6/4/85
';•*•> It 10. THt blTtil.l" lllll »T H»l Nl"ii IM.I it j«j -.01 «Eca*o
•K«*V , *
10
IIIU
gi e»-'»-«i
IIIASJII i»»ni
1U4
U4
lui
•"•fV.SJJi:?1}. "•«' "» JU»3I
-------
APPENDIX A
FSU SURFACE WATER AND SURFACE WATER
SEDIMENT DATA
(Source: Livingston, 1985)
A-l
-------
If A*
M"C,
MUlIl
CM.OM
t.to
2.12
1.10
t.O*
1/1. jo
U.*»
!•»»
11.15
••"• .
i • r • •
:.• i JK
r| TU
UUHIkU
CACMI"
IP»»?I
SiHi
txlOMu
AIUM4U1
lr
i
"!^ttu
1*00.
.00
«C2
1.1T
nat
Ct
«L
kOMlM
coon ITO SUTIINI (,»
OT-U-O*
lit 4111*1 t»»«M
tlVfll CNI>11A
ITMl liollcMTS
SAM>li}-^lflOI 0
NfTU HEASIME
"*ui!|»i»J* * iiooToo*
-Ufl
CtMOIllM
"IT*L
Html MM
r •(•*!
;l»i 1
•lASU«f
tlTI.yJ
•:fe
"!:??
i:ii
-------
10 tuOHtll *tl HOC)
Itt )k
M4-M
Ul4MTf
'3411
nlko
»IUP
HP»IUP1*
1C
noo:
}tn(tili
ITt J«
»,««0)
lO'OtiJ
l*r
to
t HObl "tlf.lM* t«inlf
«., W«^4
: .
•«••»•! Min
|M4*I
(•
mCMTlt Oil IM01
ItllM
nni
»l«40)
Ifc4«t IMIftifc
"-"-M!];U>r;j44i
It mourn in iiooj tiCciH] >il»r»
jji; . '
f|* > »oin,Hj;
M iNOti'ii ttt DOOJ TICi|J-gll4>
-------
r? 141
(•oMiiT
"{ASUM
It.TC
'lil
IIU1MJ*
4lt«.CO
TI*EI
"ITAl
coot i IOT
.
I:!
01
iI»E»i :n|>3
|»«i UD MS
l»"»i«5-f l-i
COOfi 101 SliMONi )»
101 01-14-1)
tt«l.
« :5
.71
i.ti
I
o\
• Iff** CM
SMHEi-Mftli 01-
•STU
COOli
^c ^
Hi«tU«E
414..
« 1.0
•I8
«:l|
11.to
01
Ifft
!*N»
"IT41
1(40
COOEl 140 STlIIONi 0*
'oi-Z*-t!
.»*
• IVEII :-«i»ji» coon i*»
IVEII :-«i»
t'll siOM
"CIU
NEASUIE t*»*l
10010.00~~
!!•• 71. 1*
tine « I. to
«ic«ii i.M
ctaoniut f.i*
It
JJji,r,ltl.f?TV
HE 141
CAOlIlM
COOEl
IIAflONi OT
It 10. 00
.01
i.3i
l i*e } . Jo
IlHC < l.-O
NICKEL J.il
CHOHIUI J.»»
lir
COOcl 110 S?4tt3
-------
•o iMciiTi! i» noo: 'if.;*:
t:'
I*
octi
it 1 1003
io;»
I?'!
II-
00*1
«« 11003
ll
i'-'
o-octi
vt ifcoriTis t« 11003
0*t
M>
'1S?J
IllAII
IT UK
?••
i"M
vniwoT]
ic iHOfiTit i« 11003 »n'«ih5
TO
0» 11003
»|H 3
MUbO* >
10 iHOHVlf It «H03
00*1
l!-t
li:MM '
T11
IN44I
I«OI1'I I (• IN03
00
«0
mi-
»»-to-tt
•« 11003
H-'1
wnt unit
I*"
B0-0»«1
<«.41 !*rt«?.
»i-«c-tt mi-i j-g
Sl^i^lO3'
»« HCO: TIC «:».:'
10
fftCCC
tlK ?•.•!?]> i KM
noo: T-t<;-5 •»»*:•
-------
oo
I
et
1
».
re-I
tft
«<•
!•*
oo-
"
HI
tr. i no*
IMOIIflt 161 1100)
•!»• ••*
It it-VM
HOC 3 »
mil
«»ii
_"£!——
'"jj-iru;;.
10 ihOII'lt I»1 11003 «U
-------
It
r>
J
s-
MtD
. "*:,
«CV.;.r
l.l?
1.30
• »*
CM:»TKI COOki UI
}I«»llD-f ItlSi 01-II-.0*
(•Mil. ittluM I»>M
• lU-IMoi"" " MJliT}!""
tti^jim .'t
CO»»IO
»ii«fi
Ci40tlu<
ki«««i
01
!*.»»
caoii ITS SKIIJ^I 01
itunlxui
}!)>.}t
>.}t
.1}
».!'
«)•?•
1.50
1.30
».*«
• Kill CHI*)Lt COOH l«l
•Sltl
rioii
«<«iu*t irrnl
lit* 10.!0
1 I »*
if'fi ifrlnfNll
twil»-r|!l0>
niu
i»riu
,
. !:
.SiU .:5i
»00
l»»0
M"C
.0*
,'iS
?•!!
I.O
lit!
l.ll
Ot-U-ll
•IUI
Ctoxluil
'I?'.
CiUoKiui
ll»li i
•i iti
.OO
.01
.10
.ii
'xf}
i.it
CJOli ITT tllllOii J»
l-l>-l»
i»rm
AlunlHJil
C ton I HI
CJ»»I«
Itf
141.00
.0*
:
.{i
tlvfli HI>Olt COOii 1*1
o*
<<[IU
OOtlUll
cnrrtt
ti to
tlN(
MUlfl
CHOOtlUN
•usual
' "»»o..?-
.>«
.0%
).
5.
(.Of
1. 01
».10
;HI»J
COOli !•• SltTlOm OT
Hi Itl
CtOHllM
CO*>I4
1 tO
ent I
•ItiUti_
- "»«:•$•
.01
. ?:i!
>:tt
:x:»jii coon i»» II*IIONI tt
KltjUlf
C0>'<4
tiiD
line
sIKIl
ItOt.OO
.11
J.JJ
Jl.10
i.£o
l.r)
-------
oi-v
"*f! ?»•." r ^i! T^ r *sii TS." r *5§
i ::.*. i xi i :;.*
5-* sr£ s-S
ic 7««» ie T»« ic T»"
Bcu 1C — e )<• * o
}•>»• ••>»« !•» .« 0
1 •» | | w I | m
Oo» 1 V m OOWOO*v 1 « •» *»fw.»»vwt» 1 « w •••'••i»»»*»«o
— jj jj ^ ^jj •irui""ra
to
•4
to>
f
ac ic** c ^c i If* v act ic<* c ac
a *»x ^ a i *»x a a i *>•! a a
0 ^ 0 r- 9 •-
t*«.to i a •• to ta»>»
^ •>»••' |M fs#w v> <>«•
C i »« * C I »rt e i »f*
J» fw U 1 «• to> O * PI* t,
m M |m » O H* ^ e
— * 1 1 * ' *•*
po» v oooooo«t * •.»»>. n»*>»o * w»«wvwMiw*e
~-Oj, — ,, J ,» ~ ..«,«.».
to to
! ?
W P>
» t
i "-C
" *
a " M
8
to *••>•
»•
wft
»*
a cto
to ^
- **
* #w
*v M
«•
to
a
w
Q>"*O • » t 1 to *"•*• o *'"^ * J a 1 to
r ;fii' i^: r '"slT
« J ^C" J a I
* S£ 1"
i i-S IS
" r 2 j~
0-tw*°'K'|« :; "-^'"jj
w
£rx»?oc|» i~» *ys{t'/I!?
aw •<— i f>. . jijj . — i
c^ "jici jw" i- 5w i
A M 1 4<«1 a M 1
1 k-«— 1
o *•
I 3 -• » i a
* 1 » 0- 1 »
1 v «•>• I v
ic i »*•» i e
15 3 g 12
!- i r i.
l«~«~.j, ~ »«,. .,0^
w
-------
«t
tt
IIT« «'«»n
tti nonl TIC/IN:
•uo:
•I
8t«
«•
or
knt.
mi
«1I HOOD «
!i:
I: '
to i*CllflS III 1100} T1t tniflitntf
111 i IOC? "«UclM3 lll«M
It I WII»0*M)
«{ II fl»:^
?l > C44C)
I knNOf)
ot > Momumi
„.____— ijns
?!»• »»•«*•
I!!
M! I M0>li)
1?»3|H
lk«4l IMI?*iM
t«-t«-i« in^'«-«
la i-ciitu u narj I"i04**3
o<
sUi,'/ --Tn
It
it
1 1")
S1VX3M
-------
2I-V
I?!
Is; s
m * +^- *«* I m
TS- S *S| TS,
»»* I T?.
ir
•**
•>•*"
S
!J
'^ J
• •
ii
s :-s
• T S
.ri
-15 ..,
I •* f •*!
•
rvss ? j;s, J"«'«t'<-
- -
*»^*iM
-------
»r
-- .-
r'lt- i?««ns 1)4
uoc3 titcix: itM
to-
ri-
K
IS
If mCMMt 14 HOC
• U««
: ti
llll—_ _ kfnlnnif^
*Tk44l 11-njTJH 1THII
zr tucnvu nz i joe? fio4iM: iiMi*
10*
»«
Zf
if
10'
If
M-II-J
10 IHCIKII tit 11005
ir-
0>'
»• 441 -:>0t»>ll
" f>|T> »*li"l
}ii not: «-C*:M: i
??: : "\ft\\
!?•'» fcM
J: * .JKftj
ft'! kiwUm*
mi*
wiiMOrtti
'•UK
«0 IMCI1T1I 0*2 l 100) HC.IHJ
tf
zo* »
»o* >
tc-
t»-i
lo°'. :
it-
i>ec:
IP'
•CM
• il«* tfM1> I)
TO ikoii'ij (i nocS «U<:H: n-1
fC'
oo*
*!*
»?•
lo*
ti-
vi ;•
Ik44l XfllTik
:- i«tf•-.:
•••:
ri-
Cf
>«! i
0111
IJ"
if
Ir-
it •
0»31
-------
00
!*:
to*
ft* «iiii»ni»_
"TkJ*i~lMi»Tii * mm
HI noo
si:
~~T
JilfH «=»«KJ l]«t
tit.iM: in*!
l*n
»»«*OJ
MIHOT}
minium*
tt-*i-to
Jii
i:»»nt
Hi
1J:
Jf-
NltlVOVtO
1* \
kflibO*}
»i mott*tf iti iMoi
lint*IN
M-'-H*i'll
IM44I IMtVIM
It tMimt
un i*
l*Ui
>•!«(«
1*114
1><»1
»I««OJ
MUM
"i™
IT_
n**"*!"^*7^
'::. ill «-iri -II-IH':"I»|»I i
»•-»»-10 ll>11M*t
lilt* i-Moi 'l<'i
10 iHOii*is tit uoc3 »Ufin: ii»«i»
fo*
«{•«
:tw
}Ht]
OT]]
.f.«oi
bxiuor)
10 >Mbiivit (oi ;ico: .T-'M;
»1- > hAlNOPO
I l|kl «>
1 ";l »-,' 1. »
«• IHOJtl*if
IMOJ
i«n(*fn
in. .
«o-oo-fj imjii-9i'1<-»
l?ifp «-•:"' •:••
v-- •;?•)? • ic«i-3 «,*• •
Hi
f»-f
-------
Mi:
••irmi
CN«ON|IM
.III
. 1
• c»
.tt
141-Kl
Ml 41
w
OM.
(4* * II
CMionkiM * lltl
ivlti CHI'OIA (OOI<
f»(l SUM'* 44 If I
AiiKfl-Hli.oi io-ii-o
Jf#?§|SW??l*4lffOM' *' IUII°"' *•
PCI41 Nf4IWtf
klCKl < ',)[
C'-.ai-rj" • .10
ii.fii C": • u« c:oti *t
*»••! ,U{ i « ••!.-
01
iO *»
•rt«i
~z"IJ
•ti».«t <»f*i
~:JT
.:i1
:^
• *'
!lv|ti CMt*oi4
:Ui,w?Kr
coon
1-10-4*
01
01 1) *>
Jin?
llcn'l
0
• IVlli CM|»01» COOfi »*
It'll
«4HH
f«l4l
41UHIHU1
lli CM|»01» COOfi
ll lUfcli' »*lt»
Hffr>>l.lOI 1I-I1-**
^I'M
*•'?
«Ji
01
01 10 •>
* i**»
nkitci
CIMOIUtIK
•• 1
.oe
.10
iiwii CKi'Ji* capti ««
HJI4L KttSUK I'm I
AIU*1HUH
SfAtlONI 01
MTU
ItCiSUtt
CiDHlUll
orrit
U'S
ii«c
NIC(fL
CMOMU*
•ITU
*.*0
« .02
« .of
!•••
.0*
< .0*
< .10
IC.kO
< .:j
< .4!
'
tut»
..UI.JNI il
KlOi 1I-D-I*
US HI
t«0
}.{
.*
,•$
l.i
!!«•• JHi'iiA . coon «i
tt'li tuiift iAiii
}AHHU-MilOi li-ll-i
**
•{?
'it
-------
9T-V
-------
MVEIi CHl'OlA C30t*i :••:•• i
jo- <.i
-Jf-li-J*
•a
;.:; .1 ii
AIJ1|«.|« 1.33
I
*—•
en
cSSflr
1-41
00ft 1T4 StAIIONI 0*
l»-ll
Mi AS Ml l»»«ll
r»?![.fA.Til»..,
!*f*l.C.!*lf)>-A ..COOfl 111 STAIIONI 01
!I»i
d
I JUI»;T VATEi
»«-«»-»»
HtfU
ttunlxuii
CA6MIIM
CHtON
IUK
.00
•>
-------
2
C
0.
s
> - - • • "JI.B
«*• rr.i;;iM ;i i'^;<;
ii'.$ in. I ;: . i, *(( - ,c.
:,:••• ' * a ? *
•«•».!.-•«.:..•«
>f;«. *i
!.i-1«tiii^i €>-.•••.-»» *•"
• ri
I."J«: Cl
•lK| J
.00
. f.O
I
»—•
~»J
i .-.>:: _ :. •
• .. -.• i -r.''.. • i : i'..
•• • .'• ! I • • - I
.,-3
.01
!'.-•> :HI»;.» :-(:i t-i 'ii•
!«••: »:;;.' ;i :ij:» «i: j; s-i:
'... t -fjit^ • *»•£*-*< tii;7^lAi»
» : I 4. ».».'..••: I ' ' -I
II.'^0
-------
APPENDIX B
PRIORITY POLLUTANT CONFIRMATION STUDY
ANALYTICAL DATA
B-l
nl*i*» mid i-fi* ir«»ii(ii*
-------
ecology and environment, inc.
ANALYTICAL SIBVtCU CENTiB P 0 BOX 0. BUFFALO. NEW YORK 14225, TEL 716-631-0360
lnt»rn»(»on»l Sp»ct«it»ti in the Environmental Scwncn
DATE: November 8, 1985
TO: Florida Department of Environmental Regulation
Job No. U-2387
Case Narrative
General
Enclosed are the analytical results for case no. U-2387. All samples
were received in good condition on September 21, 1985.
Volatiles
Vinyl acetate was not present in the calibration standard because we
have been unable to obtain a pure standard from USEPA. It was not
detected in any sample. For the same reason, 1,1-dichloroethene was
not included in the matrix spike solution.
Vinyl chloride (ccc) exhibited a X D greater than 25X on September 27,
1985. Since its presence was not detected in the samples, this has
caused no significant effect on the sample data.
Semivolatiles
Di-n-octylphthalate (ccc) exhibited X D more than 25X on October 4,
1985 and pentachlorophenol exhibited X D more than 25X on October 7,
1985 calibration check analyses.
The semivoUtile fraction of sample DSU-02 (lab 16631) was analyzed
twice because of low surrogate recovery. Both analysis are reported.
2-methylphenol was initially detected in sample FSW-02 (lab 16630) but
not in the field duplicate sample DSW-02 (lab *6631). Because of this
discrepancy, sample FSW-02 was re-extracted and re-analyzed for the
acid phenolic compounds only. No 2-methylphenol was then detected,
preventing confirmation of the compound. Information concerning
tentatively identified compounds in sample FSW-02 was obtained from
the initial analysis of that sample. We are currently investigating
this apparent sample contamination.
B-2 OOO
-------
QA/QC SAMPLES
Laboratory QC samples are identified by the following table headings:
Quality Control for Accuracy: Percent Difference - EPA Quality
Assurance Materials
Quality Control for Accuracy: Percent Recovery for Spiked Water
(Soil) Samples
Quality Control for Precision: Results of Analysis of Replicate
Water (Soil) Samples
Trip and rinsate blank samples are numbered as follows:
Trip Blanks
SBB01
SBB02
SBB03
SBB04
SBB05
SBB06
SBB07
GWB01
GWBB01
GWBB02
GWBB03
HGWBB
Rinsate Samples
FSR01
FSR02
FSR03
FSR04
FSR05
FSR06
FSR07
FSR08
FSR09
FSR16
FSR17
FSR18
GWR01
GWR02
GUR03
GWR04
GWR05
B-l-1
-0
unit i
-------
ecology and environment, inc.
LABORATORY REPORT
FOR
Sapp Battery
Job No.:
Sample Date:
Date Received:
Sample Type:
E * E Lab
Number 85-
6627
6628
6629
6630
6631
6632
6633
6634
6635
6636
6637
6638
U-2387
9/19,20/85
9/21/85
Water Grab
Customer
Number
FEW 03A
FSW 01
FRW 01
FSW 02
OSW 02
FSW 03
FSW 04
FEW 03C
FEW 09C
FEW 03B8
GWR 01
GWB 01
Sampled 8y:
Delivered By:
Cyanide
mq/L
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
E i. E, Inc.
Federal Express
Sulfate
mg/L
29
24
86
29
29
66
38
330
39
2000
1.0
1.0
Analytical References;
"Methods for the Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes", EPA-600/4- 79-020,
March 1983.
Supervising Ana1yst_
Date:
B-4
-------
A. C1 ifton
Page 2
November 8, 1985
Pesticides/PCBs
Heptachlor exhibited a percent difference more than 15X on the
October 9, 1985 standard check for quantitation. Oelta-BHC,
gamma-BHC, heptachlor and endrin exhibited a percent difference more
than 20X on the November 1, 1985 standard check for confirmation.
Since none of these compounds -were confirmed as being present in the
samples, the percent difference has no significant effect on the
sample data.
If you have any questions on any analyses, please contact me.
Sincerely,
Andrew P. Clifton
APC/cmp
8-3
'"O u<*vJe' i-tniim n.nl >•«•
-------
U-2387
RESULTS OT WATER ANALYSES
FOR PRIORITY POLLUTANT METALS
(•11 results in «g/L)
E 4 E Laboratory No.i 85-
Smple Identity
Antwony
Arsenic
Beryl liu»
detail*
Chrowiui
Cooper
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
ThalUui
Zinc
6633
FSW
04
<0.060
<0.005
<0.015
<0.001
<0.015
<0.025
0.0»
<0.0002
<0.020
<0.005
<0.005
<0.00)
0.03*
6634
FEW
03C
0.118
0.282
<0.015
0.004
<0.015
<0.025
4.96
<0.0002
-------
U-2387
RESULTS CT WATER ANALYSES
FOR PRIORITY POLLUTANT tCTALS
(•11 results in »g/L)
E 4 E Laboratory No.t 85-
Sanple Identity
Antimony
Arsenic
BerylUui
CadMiu*
Chrtxiui
Copper
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
ThalliuH
Zinc
6627
FEW
03A
<0.060
<0.005
<0.015
0.003
<0.015
0.119
0.609
<0.0002
0.028
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
0.160
6628
FSH
01
<0.060
<0.005
<0.015
-------
QUALITY CONTROL FOR ACCURACY: PERCENT RECOVERY
FOR SPIKED MATER SAMPLES
Analysis
Antimony
Arsenic
Cadmiun
Lead
Mercury
SelenliM
Silver
Thslliu.
Cy snide
E 4 E
Laboratory
No. 85-
6638
6638
6638
6638
6638
6638
6638
6638
6638
Origins I
Value
<60
<5
<1
".8
<0.2
<5
<5
<5
<20
Anoint
Added
(ug/L)
120
25
2.5
25
1.0
25
25
25
45
A»o
-------
U-2387
QUALITY CONTROL FOR PRECISION
RESULTS OF ANALYSIS OF REPLICATE
ANALYSES OF WATER SAMPLES
Element
ChroBiun
BeryUius
Copper
Nickel
Zinc
Silver
Arsenic
Antimony
Selenlusi
Thelliui
Mercury
CKtaim
Lead
Cysnlde
E & E
Laboratory
No. 85-
6631
6631
6631
6631
6631
6631
6631
6631
6631
6631
6630
6631
6631
6636
Original
Analysis
<0.015
<0.015
<0.025
0.023
<0.020
<0.005
<0.005
<0.060
<0.005
<0.005
<0.0002
<0.001
1.06
<0.020
Repllcite
Analysis
<0.015
<0.015
<0.025
<0.020
<0.020
<0.00i
<0.005
C0.060
<0.005
-------
ecology and environment, inc.
ixMnmenw Sc«cn*n *\ in* tnvmnmmi
LABORATORY REPORT
FOR
Sapp Battery
Job No.:
Sample Date:
Date Received:
Sample Type:
*As Received
**Dry Weight
U-2392
9/20/85
9/24/85
Soil and Water
Sampled By: E i E, Inc.
Delivered By: Federal Express
E & E Lab
Number 85-
6656
6657
6658
6659
6660
6661
6662
Customer
Number
FM Rinsate
2040
FSG 23P
FSG 54P
FSA 06P
FSA 09P
DSA 09P
FMH 20
Cyanide
mq/kg*
<0.020 mg/L
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
Water
Extractable
Sulfate
mg/kg**
1.0 mg/L
33
86
110
260
290
150
X Solids
87
97
88
87
87
74
Analytical References:
"Methods for the Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes", EPA-600/4-79-020,
March 1983.
"Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods,
"SW-846, Second Edition, U.S. EPA, 1982.
Supervising Analyst^
Date: V^K;
B-10
-------
U-2387
QUALITY CONTROL FOR ACCURACY!
PERCENT DIFFERENCE—EPA QUALITY ASSURANCE MATERIALS
Clement
Antimony
Arsenic
Beryl linn
CsdMiuM
Chro»iu»
Copper
Leed
Mercury
Nickel
Seleniue
Silver
Thsllius
Zinc
Concentrations
Known
101.5
26. 7
235
3.3
261
339
42.7
8.73
207
50.2
600
25.0
418
in wq/L
Determined
108.9
26.0
219
3.2
248
315
42.2
9.02
221
43.6
608
27.1
432
Percent
Difference
7.3
2.6
6.8
3.0
5.0
7.1
1.2
3.3
6.8
13.1
1.3
8.4
3.3
Motet Thess results ere within the 95S confidence intervei for th«M
psreaeters.
B-9'
-------
RCSULTS IF SOIL AIKLYSIS FOR PRIORITY POLLUTANT
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMTOIMOS
(raaulta in uo/kg • racaivad unlaaa noted)
U-2392
pp»
(4V)
(6V)
(7V)
(10V)
(11V)
(13V)
(14V)
(15V)
(16V)
(19V)
(23V)
(29V)
(JOV)
(32V)
(33V)
(38V)
(44V)
(45V)
(46V)
(47V)
(48V)
(51V)
(85V)
(86V)
(87V)
(88V)
CAS*
71-43-2
56-23-5
108-90-7
10746-2
71-55-6
75-34-3
•79-00-5
79-34-5
75-00-3
110-75-8
67-46-3
75-35-4
156-60-5
78-87-5
10061-02-6
10061-01-09
100-41-4
75-09-2
74-87-3
74-83-9
75-25-2
75-27-4
124-48-1
127-18-4
108-88-3
79-01-6
75-01-4
Con pound
•catena*
banzana
carton tatracUorida
chlorobanzana
1,2-«
toli*n«*
trichlorovthan*
vinyl chlorldt
2 butvxm*4'
E ft E Lab NurtMr 85- 6656
Swplt Idwitity FM
Rinaat*
»ioA
2040
6.8
O
<3
O
<3
3.5
O
<3
O
<3
O
<3
O
<3
O
<3
O
0
<3»
O
<3
0
<3
O
<3
<3
O
<3
O
6657
FSG
23P
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
81
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
le dattction linit
*Coapound praaant in inatrmant blank
B-12
-------
U-2392
RESULTS OF A MATCR AND SOIL ANALYSES
FOR PRIORITY POLLUTANT ICTALS
(rwults in mg/kq m received unlese noted)
E a E Leboretory No.
Senple Identity
AntlMny
Arwnic
Beryl Ilia
CKtaiui
ChroBiui
Copper
lem)
Mercury
Nickel
SeleniuB
Silver
The Mil*
Zinc
: 85- 6656>
FM Rlneete
2040
<0.060
<0.005
<0.015
-------
CD
I
3 2
i »MOk7*n4
i TI
<«<«>»
§
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
i§§§§§§§§
AAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAA I-*
§§§£§
AA,AA AAAAA
v» >£ M» ^l~^ vj ^? ¥* ^ IB
8 S 8 8l§ 8 § | 815
AAAAA
^AAA AAAAAAAAA
A A A A
A A A A I-* A 1-^ AAA AAAAAAAA
v/'srv'vlv/'vlty^^'l^^^^^vyrvi?
I §18 §l§ 8 i 8l8 S 8 g 8 8 § 8 g § § § i
A A A ^ A A A I-* A
AAAAAAAA/
ooooorSoOoooOo
/V/VAAAA/VAAA^A^AA
S'vV^-^v^vJ^iffwfiC^iCwvn
noOoOOOOw^o
3OOOOOOOOOO
2
Ul
r
s
1
w ur i
I *'
10 ii
! h
S »9
H- —4
i 3
f
r-
i
-------
RESULTS OF SOIL ANALYSIS FOR
ACID COMPOUND
(•11 results in yg/kg m received)
U-2392
PP t
CAS I
Coepound
6657 6658 6659 6660 6661 6662
FSC
2JP
FSG
54f
FSA
06P
FSA
09P
OSA
09P
rm
20
(21A) 88-06-2 2,4,6-trichlorophenol
(22A) 59-50-7 p-chloro-«-crMol
(24A) 95-57-8 2-chlorophenol
(J1A) 120-83-2 2,4-dicnlorophenol
(34A) 105-47-9 2,4-dlMthyl phenol
(57 A) 88-7%$ 2-nitrophenol
(58A) 100-02-7 4-oitrophenol
(59A) 51-28-) 2,4-dinitrophenol
(60A) 534-52-1 4,6-4inltre-2-
-------
U-2592
QUALITY CONTROL FOR ACCURACY:
PERCENT DIFFERENCE—EPA QUALITY ASSURANCE MATERIALS
Element
Antimony
Arsenic
Berylliue
Cwfciui
Chrailu*
Copper
Lead
Htrcury
Nickel
Seltnim
Silver
ThelUiw
Zinc
Concent ret lom
Known
101.5
26.7
235
3.3
261
339
42.7
8.73
207
50.2
600
25.0
418
In jjQ/L
Determined
100.1
26.0
213
3.19
266
337
42.8
9.02
202
A3. 6
608
25.6
423
Percent
01 f ference
1.4
2.6
9.4
3.3
1.9
0.6
0.2
3.3
2.4
13
1.3
2.4
1.2
Motet Theee reeulte ere within the 95S confidence interval for theee
pereoetere.
B-16
-------
Orq«no Chlorine Pesticides and PCB's - Results in ing/kg as raceived
S«ipl* Identification
E & E l*or«tory No. 85-
Stnpl* Ovtei 9/20/85
Compound
Aldtin
•-etc
b-BHC
g-BhT
d-8HC
Chlordvw
4,»'-000
4,4'-OOE
4,4'-OOT
Oieldrin
Endosulfin I
Endo«uU«n II
Endosulf«n sulfit*
Endrin
Endrin tldanyd*
Heptaehlor
Hvptachior epoxid*
PC8 - 1016
PCS - 1221
PCS - 1232
PC8 - 1242
PC8 - 1248
PC8 - 1254
PCS - 1260
Tox»ph«n«
Endrin tetonc
mthoxycnior
FM Rinutt FSC
2040 2JP
6656* 6657
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<1.
<1.
<1.
<0.
<0.
05
05
05
05
05
50
10
10
10
10
05
10
10
10
10
05
05
50
50
50
50
50
0
0
0
10
50
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
008
008
008
008
008
08
016
016
016
016
008
016
016
016
016
ooa
008
08
08
08
08
08
16
16
16
016
08
FSC
54P
6658
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
008
008
008
008
008
08
016
016
016
016
008
016
016
016
016
008
008
08
08
08
08
<0.08
<0.
16
<0.16
<0.
16
<0.016
<0.
08
FSA
06P
6659
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
008
008
008
008
008
08
016
016
016
016
008
016
016
016
016
008
008
08
08
08
08
<0.08
<0.
16
<0.16
<0.
16
<0.016
<0.08
FSA
09P
6660
<0.008
< 0.008
<0.008 .
<0.008
<0.008
-------
ecology and environment, inc.
rnment Sp*C**M> •*tfw Emnrorwn«m
LABORATORY REPORT
FOR
Sapp Battery
Job No.: U-2388
Sample Date: 9/19,20/85
Date Received: 9/21/85
Sample Type: Soil
Sampled By: E & E, Inc.
Delivered By: Federal Express
E & E Lab
Number 85-
6639
6640
6641
6642
6643
6644
Customer
Number
FSY 01
FMH 16
FMH 17
FMH 18
FMH 19
SBB 01
Cyanide
mg/kg*
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
NA
Water
Extractable
Sulfate
mg/kg*
25
3100
2900
830
3900
5 mg/L
X Solids
90
42
78
70
60
—
NA-not analyzed due to Insufficient sample
*As Received
Analytical References:
"Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods,
"SW-846, Second Edition, U.S. EPA, 1982.
Supervising Analyst
Au
Date:
8-18
03«114
-------
U-2J92
QUALITY CONTROL FQS PRECISION
RESULTS OF ANALYSIS OF REPLICATE
ANALYSES (F MATER SAMPLES
Con pound
Aldrin
e-6HC
b-8HC
g,-8ht
d-8HC
CMordane
4.4--000
4,4'-OOE
4,4'-OOT
Oisldrln
Endosulfan I
Endoauifan II
CndosuHsn sulfats
Endrin
Endrin aldehyde
Hept senior
Heptachlor epoxide
PCB - 1016
PCB - 1221
PCB - 1232
PCB - 1242
PCB - 1248
PCB - 125*
PCB - 1260
Tomspnaoa
Endrin Ketone
Msthaiychlor
E 4 E
Laboratory
He. 85-
6656
66S6
6656
6656
6656
6656
6656
6656
6656
6656
6656
6656
6656
6656
6656
6656
6656
6656
6656
6656
6656
6656
6656
6656
6656
6656
6656
aa
Original
Anaiysia
<0,05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.50
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.05
<0.10
-------
U-2387
RESULTS OF WATER ANALYSIS FOR PRIORITY POLLUTANT
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
(•11 results in ug/L)
pp»
(4V)
(6V)
(7V)
(10V)
(11V)
(13V)
(14V)
(15V)
(16V)
(19V)
(23V)
(29V)
(30V)
(32V)
(33V)
(38V)
(44V)
(45V)
!46V>
(47V)
(48V)
(51V)
(85V)
(86V)
(87V)
(88V)
CAS*
71-43-2
56-23-5
108-90-7
107-06-2
71-55-6
75-34-3
79-00-5
79-34-5
75-00-3
110-75-fl
67-66-3
75-35-4
156-60-5
78-87-5
10061-02-6
10061-01-05
100-41-4
75-09-2
74-87-3
74-83-9
75-25-2
75-27-4
124-48-1
127-18-4
108-88-3
79-01-6
75-01-4
Conootnd
acetone*
benzene
carbon tetrechloride
chlorobenzene
1 ,2-dichloroe thane
1 ,1 , 1-tnchloroethane*
1,1-dichloroethane
1 , 1 , 2-tr ichloroethene
1 , 1 ,2,2-tetraehloroethene
chloroetnane
2-chloroethylvinyl ether
chloroform*
1 , 1 -d ichloroethene
trene-1 ,2-d ichloroethene
1 ,2-d ichloropropene
trane-1 ,3-diehloroprooene
cie-1 , 3-d ichloropropene
ethylbeniene
methylene chloride*
chloronethane
bromonethane
bronofom
bromodichloromethane
chlorodibroMOMthane
tetrechloroethene
toluene*
tr ichloroethene
vinyl chloride
E 4 E Lib Nueber 85- 6627
FEW
Saeple Identity 03A
<3»
<3
<3
<3
<3
<3
<3
<3
<3
<3
<3
<3
<3
<3
-------
U-2388
RESULTS OF SOIL AND WATER ANALYSES
FOR PRIORITY POLLUTANT *TALS
(•11 results in ing/kg m received unless noted)
E & E Laboratory No.i 85-
Soiple Identity
Antimony
Arsenic
Beryl lius
Cadniua
ChroniiK
Copper
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
Selenim
Silver
Thalliua
Zinc
6639
FSY
01
<6.0
0.71
-------
U-2387
RESULTS OF WATER ANALYSIS FOR PRIORITY POLLUTANT
ACID COMPOUNDS
(•11 results in uq/L)
PP t
CAS *
Compound
t 4 E Lab Nurt>er 85- 6627 4628 6629 6630 6631 6632
Saaple Identity
FE»' FSW
0'\ 01
01
FSW
02
OSW FSK
02 03
(21A) 88-06-2 2,4,6-tnchlorophenol
(22A) 59-50-7 p-chloro-o-cresol
(24A) 95-57-8 2-chlorotfwnol
(31A) 120-83-2 2,4-dichlorophenol
(34A) 105-67-9 2,4-dwethyl phenol
(57A) 88-75-5 2-nitrophenol
(58A) 100-02-7 A-nitropn«nol
(59A) 51-28-5 2,4-dinitropfwnol
(60A) 534-52-1 4,6-dimtro-2'Mtfcylphsnal
(64A) 87-86-5 p*ntKhloroph«nol
(65A) 108-95-2 phenol
2-*ethyl phenol
00
<30
OO
<50
<30
<30
<50
<30
<30
<50
<30
<30
<50
<10
270
00
00
00
00
00
<30
<30
<50
00
00
00
00
oo
00
00
<30
<30
<50
00
00
B-22
-------
ZJ
__*
_J
o
1_J *—'
£1
t/1 < **
«- 13 -<
VI E 3
^,° g
I!)
u>
^ x a
•OU CD
28 S
§
«» u
2uj w
u. o
•e
u
Conpoun
vvvvCvvvvvvvvvvvv/^vvvvvv/vv
VVVVVVV^VVN/V/VVVVV
* * >n m v\
Svvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
— vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
J I
C • •
•o
|
fi.
t« C-UCMO >> C
o ••••-• c S
— « JIOCOC -4 £
C M1.WI.U > M
o • • o • o * -< c
•S ? 2 I t & €
5 I 5 £5 £ fc
i It &|5 -
OO£ »2 -Tc
i. »_ o— o — •* 9
O O * • 1 I - O
'^bVlllSII*'—4
wNAol -T -..6.coTeTci».
• C «• -< M "- — — — —• O —« — »«M»tl.C
O i • c •••••iTc »»• -«.«*i||f:_
• A Oo"~"~*"'~—"U<^ o ^- ** •— *J o •) 6 OJ3
s ? sis 5 :
* § _ -S «! S 89
• c—* •«—* *«AIJ: • t*-*™-**"^ »« |IAJ£ C-CX>
* •»•£*-£>• I^OOC - JT -ICC»*Ji-Ti«
?• j5OAJU«2- — T>MN4.-«t.W»-0»— -< >- U O O 0 I-
«!«PoT.-T. -ocpYEYc i >-£ o I I I o
-
• O
o -•
5— -"^uOOOi-"**-*
i >-co|IIob5o»-
«£^—.500-t^-«^c
I o
ir» —
-.
l^>^ 1 00
o i i M> i
^ o
~ ri ^ ^
liAOo |(Mr^O«>CM4
a i * i " ' <* I'«CO«D - -
— •Ov*t-*"rf^r^ \o r-
*
8
!
i!
b >-
a a
?1
U
CO
-------
b
52
SI/I O
u.
z »g
3 £E
es
r"»-^»-KNr"r-»-«-»-*-»-*-»-*-t-v-»-w-*-*-»-»-*"T-»"»-r"*-»-*"^»-^^»-^^*-
OQOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVN/VX/VV vvvvv%^vvvvvvvvvvvv
ooooooooooooooo
oooo
oooo
oooooooo
oooooooo
oaoooooooooooooooooooooooor^ooeo
vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv
ooooo
o o o o o
eooooooooooooaoo^oooo
ooeooooo
I
•oa
-------
U-2387
RESULTS OF MATER ANALYSIS FOR PRIORITY POLLUTANT
ACID COWOUNDS
(•11 reeulte in ug/L)
pp t
CAS f
Compound
E & E Lib NtMber 85- 6633 6634 6635 6636 6637 6638
Seaple Identity
FSN FEW FEN FEW GWR GWB
04 03C 09C 03BB 01 01
(21A)
(22A)
(24A)
(3IA)
(34A)
(57A)
(58A)
(59A)
(60A)
(64A)
(65A)
88-06-2
59-50-7
95-57-8
120-83-2
105-67-9
88-75-5
100-02-7
51-28-5
534-52-1
87-86-5
108-95-2
2,4,6-trichlorophenol
p-cMoro-«-cr eeo 1
2-chloropnenol
2, 4-dlchlorophenol
2,4-diMthylphenol
2-nitrophenol
4-nitrophonol
2 , 4-dinitropheno 1
4,6-dinUro-2-e*thylphenol
pentechlorophenol
phenol
2-Mrthyl phenol
00
OO
OO
00
OO
OO
OO
<30
<30
<50
OO
00
00
00
OO
OO
OO
-------
U-2387
Orqanc Chlorine Peaticidea and PCSa - Results in ug/L
Sanple Identification FEW
OJ*
E 4 E Laboratory No. 85- 6627
Staple Date: 9/19,20/8$
Compound
Aldrin
a-8HC
b-BHC
g-8HC
d-8HC
Chlordane
4, 4' -ODD
4.4--OOE
4,4'-ODT
Oialdrin
Endosulfan I
Endoaulfan II
Cndoaulfan tuifite
Endrin
•Endrin aldetiyde
HeptacfUor
Heptachlor ipoxjfle
PCS - T016
PCS - 1221
PCS - 1232
PCS - 1242
PCS - 1248
PCS - 1254
PCS - 1260
Toxaphene
Endrin Katone
Methoxychlor
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.50
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.05
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.05
<0.05
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
-------
CO
I
**•%
5 g°
,
*o uj •**
-C U 0
a: in
00
*2
— «
I
(n
z z
u
a: in
pun
5«SS5S55S5855;S;55S5555S55l;555;S!5;5!555;5;5
ooooooooooogogogogogogogogfegooogogogogog^gcjgs
ooooooooooooooooooooooooooggooooooooooooogooo
vvvvvvvvvvCvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
oooooooooaoooooooooooooooocjoogooogooogggogogo
vCvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv/
£ 5 £ ? ?
• «^S 5
? -i- -i| s
2?3 |r?!si
• *M. o. £ a x -i a
f ? £ S
S-i c • • •
I a^ * *
I
I
Kl
II
t» O.
£ -^
8 V
•
CM •
• CN
' I ~ I I I
'r«i«rc»»
'T'*2~R>0
i 10- i l i
-28 l— (JN
S°~MC>'s'
K* — ». — Si
— —
eDi i I i I
)»<• — «M
oiSSo*- —
p- i i I i I
i i
« I I I O>
I I r» o f- I I
— — «o to f — —
in
CM
i
oo
I
|
|
i.
a
o
V
I
o
o
-------
U-2388
RESULTS OF SOIL ANALYSIS FOR PRIORITY POLLUTANT
ACID COMPOUNDS
(all results in ug/kg •• received)
pp »
(21A)
(22A)
(24A)
(31A)
(34A)
(57A)
(58A)
(59A)
(60A)
(64A)
(65A)
CAS *
88-06-2
59-50-7
95-57-8
120-83-2
105-67-9
88-75-5
100-02-7
51-28-5
534-52-1
87-86-5
108-95-2
Coapotnd
2,4,6-trlchloraph«nol
p-cfiloro-o-ertw 1
2-ehloreph«nol
2, 4-dichlorcphenol
2,4-diMthylptwnol
2-nitrophenol
4-nitroph»nol
2,4.dinitroph«nol
4,6-dlnitro-2-iMtriylph*nal
p«nt Khloraptenol
ptwnol
4-wthrlph*nal
6639
FSY
01
<500
<500
<500
000
<500
<500
<500
<1500
<1500
<1500
<500
<500
6640
rm
16
<500
<500
<500
<500
<500
<500
<500
<1500
<1500
<1500
<500
<500
6641
rm
17
<500
<500
<500
<500
<500
<500
<500
<1500
<1500
<500
<500
<500
6642
FW
18
<500
<500
<500
<500
<500
<500
<500
<1500
<1500
<500
<500
1100
6643
rm
19
<500
<500
<500
<500
<500
<500
<500
<1500
<1500
<500
<500
OOO
6644
SBB
01
M
NA
NA
N»
NA
Nt
NA
NA
NA
UK
NA
N»
NA - Not in«lyr«d, irwufficient
1*.
B-28
-------
a
c."
+ *
J? *">
i 1
a B
& i
t n
II
tr v
•- o
M|
£ i
i 1
3 ft
" ft
2 •
It
?
rr
I
r
CD
1
ro
OB — J ^ 'J* ••• OB ^4 O* J* fr <
\»^g«s»MvJ>v*frfrv|lj
X J» ' ' Al Al ij '
1 1 O» CD S 1 1 | | 1
t*-tO«79*i< ?•<
qra>-»-rfC-33 * 5 :
e^acioll o 9 "
^^'^'•••tQO 1<- «-k o a i* • 3 J
3 g- 3 o jr JT 1 T «• • |
*irr 3 a O § A
^i| \
l-ssssssssss,
l^ssssssasss,
l^i ^ AAA AA A AAA
i»ssssssssss
(S^A AA A AA A -A'i/i
-gg^SSSSSSS
|O»A/^AAAAAAAA
- s s| s ss s sss
ac«oocicc oo1^
D ^'K*Q^v>*>oa«kj«»^««-a^<4:
e <-c5f.«<.<<l?w'*2'*£3iI' *
fp 3 e- 9 -^aiT—oi-Sa*
oonC ^- • o • o a • n
y«yrr < nitfVffr*' J
3 o §0 f & i*m °
ll'l » iff *
'] ? S f
sssssssssssssssss'^
A
saaaaa|-ajsajsasjssi5js|*
<\AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA|O»
ssssssssssssssssslffi
AAA AA AA A/^ AA AAAAA/V I-*
sssssssssssssssssls
aaaaaa^a^aaaaaaaai?
accciGcocc;acc|*cc:c:a|<*
-a
-^
n
$
«.
F
s
i
Ul W
i o-
j—
S* ft
*
3 z
rr o1
ID
1
2-n «
4/1 O*
•< ^
-• -n o»
^ X P
* §
-i |
si |
~* 1
OP 9
s
E s
*i M
2 ^
S R|
1 |«
1 "9
n
a aa
5- 5*
ci J2*^
^ 3
r-
c
-H
3
-------
U-2388
Orqsno Chlorine Pestle idea snd PCB's - Results in mq/kq m received
Ssjuple Identlficstion
E & E Laboratory No. 85-
Swplt Dstet 9/19,20/85
Compound
Aldrin
•-BHC
b-BfC
g-BtC
d-BtC
Chlordsne
4,4'-000
4,4 '-OOE
4.4-.OOT
OieJdrin
Endosul fsn I
Endosul fsn II
Endosul fsn sulfste
Endrin
Endrin sldshyde
He pt senior
Heptechlor epoxide
PCS - 1016
PCS - 1221
PCB - 1232
PC8 - 1242
PCB - 1248
PCB - 1254
PCB - 1260
Toxsptwne
Endrin Katone
Hethoiychior
FSY 01
66^9
<0.008
<0.008
<0.008
<0.008
<0.008
<0.08
-------
RESULTS OF SOIL ANALYSIS FOR PRIORITY POLLUTANT
BASE/NEUTRAL COMPOUNDS
(•11 results in ug/kg •• received)
U-2J88
pp #
(18)
(58)
(88)
(96)
(128)
(188)
(208)
(258)
(26B)
(278)
(286)
(356)
(368)
(378)
(398)
(408)
(418)
(428)
(436)
(528)
(536)
(548)
(558)
(568)
(628)
(638)
(668)
(678)
(688)
(696)
(706)
(718)
(728)
(738)
(748)
(758)
(768)
(778)
(788)
(798)
(808)
(818)
(928)
(838)
(848)
CAS 1
83-32-9
92-87-5
120-82-1
118-74-1
67-72-1
1 1 1-44-4
91-58-7
95-50-1
541-73-1
106-46-7
91-94-1
121-14-2
606-20-2
122-66-7
206-44-0
7005-72-3
101-55-3
39638-32-9
111-91-1
87-68-3
77-47-4
78-59-1
91 -20-1
98-95-3
86-30-4
621-64-7
117-81-0
85-68-7
84-74-2
117-84-0
84-66-2
131-11-3
56-55-3
50-32-8
205-99-2
207-08-9
218-01-9
208-9*-«
120-12-7
191-24-2
86-7V7
85-01-8
53-70-3
193-39-5
129-00-0
Compound
•cenepnthene
benridine
1 , 2 , 4-tr ichlorobenrene
hex«chloroten?ene
hexachlor oe thane
bie(2-cnloroetny l)ether
2-chloronepnth«lene
1 ,2-dichlorotoenrene
1 , J-dichlorobenrene
1 ,4-dichloroben/eoe
3,3l-dichlorobenridlne
2,4-dinitrotoluene
2,6-dlnltrotoluene
1,2-diphenylhydr«7ine
fluorenthene
4-cftloropftenyl phenyl ether
4-6ro«ophenyl phcnyl ether
bi«(2-chlorai«oprapyl)etner
bl«( 2-chloroetoxy )«thenc
hexecMoroCut«diene
hexeehloracycloDentodien*
isopnorone
nephthelene
nitroben/ene
N-nitroeodipnenylaein*
N-nitroBOdiprapylMine
bii(2-ethylhexyl) phthelete
benzyl butyl phttwlet*
di-n-butyl phtheUte
di-n-octyl pnthel«te
diethyl phthelate
dl«ethyl phthelete
benro( •) enthr ecene
b«nro(«)pyrem
benro ( b ) f luorenthene
boflro(k) fluorwithen*
cfvywns
ecenapnthylene
enchf ejcefflV:
b*nra(ghi )p»ryl»m
riuanra
ph»n«nthren«
dlb*nra(i,n)«nthrae«n*
IndBood ,2,3-cd)pyrene
pyr«n«
E & E Lab No. 86- 6639
Se»ple Identity FSY
01
<500
<2500
<500
<500
<500
<500
<500
<50Q
<50D
<500
<500
««egt mill rmiruiifiH ni
-------
U-2388
QUALITY CONTROL FOR ACCURACY: PERCENT RECOVERY
FOR SPIKED SOIL SAMPLES
Element
Beryllium
Chroniin
Copper
Mercury
Nickel
Zinc
£ 4 E
Lsborstory
No. 85-
6639
6639
6639
6639
6639
6639
Original
Vslue
<15
52
<25
<0.2
27
73
Awount
Added
(PP*>)
50
200
250
1
500
500
Amount
Determined
27
230
179
1.06
462
462
Percent
Recovery
54
89
72
100
87
78
•Spike performed on aqueous digest of soil sample. Results reported in ppb.
B-32
-------
U-2388
QUALITY CONTROL FO* PRECISION
RESULTS OF ANALYSIS OF REPLICATE
ANALYSES Of SOIL SAMPLES
ElMwnt
ChrtMiui
terylliui
Copptr
Nlcktl
Zinc
Silvw
ArMnie
Antiaony
Seleniui
ThalUui
CadMiui
L««j
Cy«nld«
fefcury
E A E
L*or«tory
Ma. 85-
6639
6639
6639
6639
6639
6639
6639
6639
6639
6639
6639
6639
66*2
66*3
Original
Analysis
4.9
0.5
<2.5
2.5
6.9
<0.50
0.71
<6.0
<0.50
<0.50
<0.10
8.87
<1
<0.01
Repllc«t»
An«Iy«i«
6.3
<1.5
3.0
5.1
7.8
-------
U-2388
QUALITY CONTROL TOR ACCURACYi PERCENT RECOVERY
FOR SPIKED SOIL SAMPLES
Co* pound
Triehloroethene
Chlorobenzene
Toluene
Benzene
1,2, 4-T r Ichl orobenzene
Acenaphthene
2,4-dinitrotoluene
pytene
n-nltroao-di-n-propyla»ine
1 ,4-dichlorobenzene
pentachlorophenol
phenol
2-chloro phenol
*-chloro phenol
4-nltrophenol
E A E
Laboratory
*>. 85-
6639
6639
6639
6639
6639
6639
6639
6639
6639
6639
6639
6639
6639
6639
6639
Original
Value
00
<50
<50
<50
<500
<500
<500
<500
<500
<500
<1500
-------
U-2388
QUALITY CONTROL FOR ACCURACY;
PERCENT DIFFERENCE—EPA QUALITY ASSURANCE WTERIALS
ElaMnt
Areenic
Antiaony
Beryllium
Cadiiui
Cnroaiij*
Copper
leed
Hsrcury
Nickel
Selenim
Silver
Thelli«i
Zinc
Concentrations
Know
26.7
101.5
235
J.J
261
JJ9
42.7
8.7
207
50.2
600
25.0
418
in jjq/L
Determined
26.0
100.)
21J
3.2
266
337
41.7
9.0
202
43.6
608
25.6
423
Percent
Difference
2.6
1.4
9.4
3.0
1.9
0.6
2.3
3.4
2.4
13.1
1.3
2.4
1.2
Nat*i Thee» rwults
p«r Meter*.
•ithin the 95X confidence intervel for theee
B-33
r«'i«ltt||« mill ••fl«irt»ltfllriil
-------
U-2388
QUALITY CONTROL FOR ACCURACY: PERCENF RECOVERY
. FOR SPIKED SOIL SAMPLES
Con pound
Lindane
Heptachlor
Aldrin
Oieldrin
Endrin
4, 4 '-DOT
£ 4 E
Laboratory
Ho. 85-
Matrix Spike
66)9
6639
6679
6639
6639
6639
Original
Value
-------
U-2388
QUALITY CONTROL FOR ACCURACY: PERCENT RECOVERY
FOR SPIKED SOIL SAMPLES
Compound
E & E
Laboratory
^Q • 85*
Original
Value
Amount
Added
(*vm>
Amount
Determined
Percent
Recovery
Lindane
Heptachlor
AJdrin
Oieldrin
Endrin
4,4'-DOT
Matrix Spike
Duplicate
6639
6639
6639
6639
6639
6639
<0.008
-------
Table C-1
SOIL SAMPLE DATA - OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 1985
Location
FSA
DSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
OSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
DSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
DSA
FSA
FSA
Number
01
01
01
01
01
01
02
02
02
02
02
03
03
03
03
03
04
04
04
04
04
05
05
05
05
05
05
06
06
06
06
06
07
07
07
07
07
08
06
08
08
08
08
09
09
09
09
Depth
A
A
B
C
D
E
A
B
C
D
E
A
B
C
0
E
A
B
C
D
E
A
8
B
C
D
E
A
B
C
D
E
A
B
C
0
E
A
B
C
C
D
E
A
A
B
C
Lead Cadmium
(mg/kg) (
-------
APPENDIX C
SOIL AND SEDIMENT
ANALYTICAL DATA
C-l
•?<-.c'ecl oapef ill|f\
-------
Table C-1 !Cont.)
Location
FSB
FSC
FSC
OSC
FSC
FSC
FSC
FSC
FSE
DSE
FSE
FSE
FSE
FSE
FSE
FSE
FSE
FSE
FSE
FSE
FSE
FSE
DSE
FSE
FSE
FSE
FSE
FSE
FSE
FSE
FSE
DSE
FSE
FSE
FSE
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
OSG
FSG
FSG
Number
06
01
01
01
01
02
02
02
01
01
01
01
02
02
02
03
03
03
04
04
04
05
05
05
05
06
06
06
07
07
07
07
08
08
08
14
14
14
15
15
15
15
15
23
23
23
23
23
23
Depth
C
A
B
8
C
A
B
C
A
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
8
C
A
B
B
C
A
8
C
A
B
C
C
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
C
D
E
A
B
• c
C
0
E
Lead Cadmium
(«g/kg) (ing/kg)
42.00
257.00 <1
20.60 <1
16.60 <1
6.54 <1
8810.00 3.16
62.50 1.62
24.00 1.10
394.00
332.00
3.45
2.00
13.20
1.89
95.90
174.00
6.39
<5
62.90 <1
7.13 <1
6.86 <1
300.00 <1
19.80 <1
23.30 <1
61.70 <1
283.00 <1
9.80 <1
6.25 <1
1110.00
46.10
4.81
3.89
216.00
170.00
26.30
15.50 <1
4.54 <1
7.00 <1
11.90
4.63
3.75
7.29
7.33
3060.00 <1
4790.00 <1
5710.00 <1
4710.00 <1
1400.00
622.00
Ant imony
(mg/kg)
„
<12
<12
<12
<12
169.00
<12
<12
—
—
—
—
__
—
—
—
—
—
<12
<12
<12
18.60
12
<12
02
<12
<12
<12
..
—
__
„
—
„
..
<12
<12
<12
__
__
._
__
__
<12
17.30
<12
<12
__
__
pH
Units
3.90
8.54
7.26
7.61
6.10
5.61
4.20
4.25
4.66
4.89
4.66
4.27
4.55
4.47
4.37
6.61
6.79
6.73
5.67
5.58
6.25
5.95
6.22
6.19
6.44
5.68
6.67
6.55
5.68
5.96
6.35
6.34
2.66
3.15
2.98
5.25
5.52
5.32
5.41
5.39
5.11
4.70
4.69
5.75
5.84
4.53
4.49
5.40
5.51
•i Water
14.00
11.00
12.00
13.00
18.00
8.00
11.00
10.00
27.00
27.00
14.00
8.00
17.00
14.00
11.00
24.00
19.00
20.00
14.00
23.00
24.00
24.00
18.00
16.00
16.00
24.00
17.00
18.00
11.00
13.00
14.00
14.00
15.00
23.00
21.00
15.00
16.00
15.00
10.00
12.00
26.00
22.00
24.00
11.00
12.00
26.00
20.00
31.00
32.00
C-4
-------
Table C-1 (Cont.)
Location
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
DSA
FSA
FSA
FSA
DSA
FSA
FSA
DSA
FSA
FSB
FSB
FSB
FSB
FSB
DSB
FSB
FSB
FS8
FSB
FSB
FSB
FSB
FSB
FSB
FSB
FSB
FSB
FSB
FSB
OSB
FSB
FSB
FSB
FSB
Number
09
09
10
10
10
10
10
11
11
11
11
11
12
12
12
12
12
12
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
01
01
01
02
02
02
02
02
02
03
03
03
03
03
04
04
04
04
04
05
05
05
05
06
06
Depth
D
£
A
B
C
D
E
A
B
C
D
E
A
B
C
0
D
E
A
B
8
C
0
E
E
A
a
C
A
B
B
C
0
E
A
8
C
0
E
A
B
C
0
E
A
A
a
c
A
a
Lead
(ing/ kg)
9.33
10.60
10800.00
86.40
54.00
54.90
48.20
7710.00
4750.00
8140.00
547.00
190.00
2716.00
402.00
661.00
64.20
68.40
60.30
98.60
4735.00
8842.00
6317.00
217.00
151.00
254.00
43.20
11.50
2.57
8330.00
325.00
746.00
460.00
157.00
100.00
66100.00
650.00
400.00
168.00
57.00
3780.00
219.00
128.00
278.00
34.90
543.00
654.00
9.43
13.80
5300.00
3260.00
Cadmium
C mg/kg }
<,
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<.6Q
<.65
<.87
<.57
<.50
<.58
<.56
0.67
0.78
<.50
4.82
0.92
1.27
—
—
—
—
— .
__
—
__
._
.-
-.
__
—
_.
—
—
_.
—
..
—
--
..
..
—
._
Antimony
<12
<12
27.60
16.80
<12
<12
<12
24.20
13.50
45.50
<12
<12
3.60
0.52
15.40
0.23
<.20
<.23
0.22
13.90
13.60
11.80
0.56
0.46
0.64
—
—
—
..
—
._
—
._
_.
--
—
..
—
-_
._
—
-_
—
—
--
—
—
..
—
._
pH
Units
5.27
5.33
7.96
7.46
6.64
6.37
6.03
7.89
4.84
4.75
5.07
5.11
7.28
6.04
3.46
3.43
3.45
3.44
3.86
3.30
3.23
3.10
3.12
3.33
3.29
5.36
5.07
5.17
6.86
5.74
5.64
5.02
4.76
4.48
6.02
5.00
4.97
4.58
4.80
5.70
4.75
4.52
4.93
4.22
5.17
5.05
4.28
4.28
6.73
3.77
S Water
33.00
34.00
17.00
24.00
14.00
16.00
17.00
19.00
18.00
30.00
15.00
13.00
18.00
14.80
32.60
28.20
21.80
15.90
9.10
16.90
15.20
21.00
37.70
22.10
19.50
14.00
15.00
16.00
8.00
13.00
13.00
23.00
18.00
19.00
12.00
9.00
14.00
13.00
10.00
10.00
12.00
15.00
11.00
10.00
10.00
9.00
12.00
14.00
13.00
14.00
C-3
-------
Table C-1 CCont.)
Location
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
OSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
OSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
DSC
FSG
FSG
OSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
Number
56
56
62
62
62
64
64
64
64
64
64
65
65
65
65
65
66
66
66
66
66
67
67
67
67
67
67
68
68
68
69
69
69
71
71
71
71
71
73
73
73
73
75
75
75
75
75
75
Depth
D
E
A
B
C
A
B
C
D
E
C
A
B
C
0
E
A
B
C
0
E
A
B
B
C
D
E
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
8
C
D
£
A
B
B
C
A
A
B
C
D
E
Lead
(ing/kg)
4.42
4.78
102.00
22.70
6.34
16500.00
818.00
187.00
1110.00
33.10
230.00
201.00
220.00
564.00
12.30
10.40
14.10
17.20
6560.00
728.00
673.00
19.00
27.60
20.70
25.10
7.00
10.20
439.00
7.11
10.60
<5
11.00
7.66
1680.00
212.00
601.00
148.00
16.30
37.20
63.30
27.80
20.40
591.00
511.00
50.60
95.30
125.00
16.60
Cadauun Antimony pH
(mg/kg) ( mg/kg} Units
5.49
5.88
4.42
5.20
5.25
5.73
4.69
4.91
4.85
4.95
4.82
5.34
4.98
4.89
4.97
4.94
5.74
5.84
5.47
— 5.55
5.14
5.42
5.50
5.73
5.64
5.70
5.44
4.95
5.02
— 5.01
5.02
5.35
5.88
4.54
4.41
4.56
4.93
4.70
4.52
4.46
4.95
4.98
5.73
6.02
6.00
5.18
5.66
5.70
\ Water
9.00
8.00
9.00
12.00
9.00
8.00
93.00
7.00
10.00
22.00
7.00
12.00
10.00
9.00
9.00
9.00
9.00
9.00
11.00
14.00
15.00
11.00
13.00
12.00
15.00
14.00
18.00
12.00
20.00
24.00
12.00
13.00
15.00
16.00
10.00
13.00
5.00
3.00
7.00
8.00
7.00
9.00
11.00
11.00
18.00
23.00
17.00
17.00
C-6
-------
Table C-1 (Cont.)
Location
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
DSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
DSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
Number
24
24
24
25
25
25
33
33
33
33
34
34
34
34
34
35
35
35
43
43
43
44
44
44
45
45
45
51
51
51
51
51
51
53
53
53
53
53
54
54
54
54
54
55
55
55
56
56
56
Depth
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
B
C
A
8
C
0
E
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
A
B
C
D
E
A
B
C
D
E
A
B
C
D
E
A
B
C
A
B
C
Lead Cadmium
(rag/kg) (mg/kg)
26.10
8.73
10.10 ~
22.00
5.87
5.63
81.40 1.56
3.98 <1
5.50 <1
4.81 <1
246.00 <1
53.40 <1
3.08 <1
2.62 <1
8.84 <1
41.70
<5
3.68
1740.00 <1
690.00 <1
690.00 <1
17.40
3.66
4.12
68.20
8.55
3.99
19200.00 <1
22700.00 <1
84200.00 2.20
15300.00 <1
2100.00
518.00
2264.00 <1
16700.00 <1
5310.00 <1
695.00 <1
509.00 <1
177.00 <1
17.60 <1
53.90 <1
214.00
19.50
1870.00
107.00
59.00
479.00
20.20
22.90
Antimony pH
(mg/kg) Units
4.67
5.21
5.23
5.13
5.11
5.04
<12 5.71
<12 5.44
<12 5.19
<12 4.97
<12 5.90
<12 5.10
<12 5.00
<12 5.55
<12 5.18
5.90
5.22
5.32
<12 5.66
<12 4.87
<12 4.75
— 4.82
4.83
4.94
5.48
5.20
5.02
55.90 5.65
42.20 6.18
110.00 5.67
16.70 5.15
5.42
6.21
<12 5.25
31.50 6.17
18.70 5.10
<12 5.40
<12 5.76
<12 4.75
<12 4.92
<12 4.65
5.48
5.29
5.57
4.55
5.22
5.61
5.15
4.96
% Water
15.00
16.00
13.00
14.00
12.00
12.00
11.00
12.00
11.00
14.00
9.00
17.00
18.00
7.00
7.00
12.00
13.00
14.00
11.00
9.00
13.00
7.00
9.00
12.00
11.00
16.00
16.00
12.00
14.00
14.00
17.00
12.00
9.00
10.00
15.00
21.00
13.00
15.00
20.00
16.00
16.00
23.00
20.00
20.00
18.00
16.00
14.00
22.00
23.00
C-5
aaoer
-------
Table C-1 (Cont.)
Location
FSG
FSG
FSC
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
DSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSL
DSL
FSL
FSS
FSS
FSS
FSS
FSS
FSS
FSS
FSS
FSS
FSS
FSS
FSS
FSS
FSS
FSS
OSS
FSS
FSS
FSS
DSS
Number
91
91
95
95
95
95
95
96
96
96
96
96
96
97
97
97
97
97
01
01
02
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
15
16
17
18
18
Depth
D
E
A
8
C
D
E
A
A
B
C
D
E
A
B
C
0
E
Lead Cadiiu*
(i»g/kg) (mg/kg)
20.20
18.00
322.00
91 .60
115.00
145.00
31.30
16100.00
169000.00
96600.00
872.00
543.00
234.00
3640.00
29600.00
5010.00
462.00
571.00
3020.00 <1
9670.00 <1
27500.00 <1
218.00
3.59
10.40
95.50
271.00
3.04
7.30
13.50
10.00
2.15
242.00
56.10
20.90
8.62
1670.00
1760.00
76.40 <1
56.70 <1
179.00 <1
169.00 <1
Ant imony pH
(rag/kg) Units
4.85
— 4.99
5.27
5.35
5.37
5.81
5.49
6.61
6.72
— 6.80
5.77
6.19
6.32
7.03
5.78
5.50
5.04
5.21
14.40 6.89
21.90 6.88
51.00 6.88
7.29
4.91
5.50
6.21
6.00
4.17
4.29
4.31
4.56
4.38
4.21
4.04
3.99
5.11
5.94
5.76
<12 4.24
<12 3.96
<12 3.72
<12 3.52
5 Mater
18.00
14.00
8.00
9.00
10.00
9.00
11.00
11.00
9.00
14.00
13.00
9.00
10.00
14.00
18.00
16.00
13.00
12.00
22.00
21.00
18.00
14.00
18.00
6.00
10.00
13.00
8.00
18.00
21.00
19.00
14.00
13.00
34.00
22.00
19.00
19.00
19.00
18.00
21.00
15.00
16.00
C-8
-------
Table C-l (Cant.)
Location
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
DSC
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
DSG
FSG
FSC
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSC
FSG
FSG
FSG
FSG
Number
76
76
76
76
76
77
77
77
77
77
78
78
78
78
78
79
79
79
79
32
82
82
84
84
84
85
85
85
85
85
86
86
86
86
86
86
87
87
87
87
87
88
88
88
88
88
91
91
91
Depth
A
B
C
0
E
A
8
C
D
E
A
8
C
D
E
A
B
C
C
A
B
C
A
8
C
A
B
C
0
£
A
A
B
C
0
E
A
B
C
0
E
A
B
C
0
£
A
B
C
Lead Cadmiun
(mg/kg} v'wg/kg)
3770.00
8320.00
25300.00
210.00
200.00
813.00
3940.00
5120.00
574.00
947.00
59.00
75.60
59.20
1 1 .00
16.00
<10
5.83
<5
7.19
8301.00
17.00
17.20
336.00
163.00
141.00
1790.00
267.00
57.50
50.20
94.00
90000.00
22300.00
43800.00
46700.00
16200.00
692.00
1180.00
6090.00
9430.00
703.00
344.00
46.70
45.50
5.35
4.17
5.61
636.00
342.00
258.00
Ant imony pH
(iig/kg) Units
5.66
5.47
5.97
5.15
6.30
5.44
5.39
— 5.61
5.21
5.22
5.92
5.70
5.71
5.35
5.53
5.60
5.55
4.95
5.04
5.18
4.68
4.75
3.95
4.09
4.33
5.35
S.12
5.55
5.15
4.89
6.77
6.80
&.58
6.23
6.18
5.89
7.87
5.39
4.86
— 5.16
5.13
5.00
5.10
— 6.17
5.54
5.16
4.20
4.63
4.59
% Water
15.00
8.00
11.00
12.00
9.00
10.00
10.00
14.00
14.00
18.00
11.00
14.00
13.00
16.00
20.00
16.00
15.00
17.00
20.00
17.00
15.00
14.00
11.00
11.00
13.00
9.00
8.00
11.00
14.00
16.00
10.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
11.00
12.00
8.00
8.00
20.00
16.00
15.00
17.00
10.00
14.00
11.00
14.00
11.00
16.00
16.00
C-7
eaoer
-------
Table C-2 (Cont.)
Location
FMK
FMK
FMK
FMK
FMK
FMK
FMK
DMK
FMK
FMK
FMK
FMK
FMK
FMK
FMK
FMK
FMT
FMT
FMT
FMT
FMT
FMT
FMT
FMT
FMT
FMT
FMT
FMT
FMT
DMT
FMT
FMT
FMT
FMT
FMT
FMT
FMT
DMT
FMT
FMT
FMT
FMT
Number
05
05
05
06
06
06
07
07
07
07
08
08
08
09
09
09
01
01
02
02
03
03
04
04
05
05
07
07
08
08
08
09
09
10
10
11
11
11
12
12
13
13
Depth
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
A
B
A
B
A
B
A
B
A
B
A
A
B
A
B
A
B
A
B
B
A
B
A
B
Lead
(mg/kg)
238.00
5.28
3.84
24.20
18.20
2.16
6,660.00
6,410.00
31.40
2.57
34,700.00
953.00
110.00
25.10
<1
6.75
380.00
27.40
111.40
47.20
593.00
57.50
250.00
69.70
520.00
25.20
269.00
<26.10
22.70
34.30
33.20
99.70
62.00
212.00
28.90
34.00
10.70
5.40
10.10
57.00
20.10
26.30
Cadmium
(nig/kg)
0
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
1.33
1.34
<1
<1
1.39
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<.72
<.49
<.27
<.46
0.66
<.61
<.53
<.50
<.55
<.47
<2.72
<2.61
<.49
<.31
<.29
<1.10
<.54
1.21
<.47
<.31
<.40
<.43
<.63
<.66
<.35
<.18
Antimony
(nig/kg)
02
<12
<12
<12
<12
<12
146.00
131.00
<12
<12
216.00
<12
<12
<12
<12
<12
<.29
<.20
<.11
<.18
0.66
<.24
<.21
<.20
0.55
<.19
8.71
1.04
<.20
<.12
<.11
<.44
<.22
0.87
<.19
<.36
0.16
<.17
<.25
<.16
<.14
<.44
PH
Units
4.05
4.05
4.00
5.61
4.78
3.92
5.09
5.33
4.75
5.12
5.27
5.32
5.06
6.37
6.46
5.93
4.33
4.17
5.37
4.19
4.69
3.97
4.21
3.95
4.22
3.85
3.90
3.49
4.04
4.12
4.02
4.38
4.20
4.15
3.54
5.48
4.71
4.78
4.15
3.70
5.58
4.30
% Mater
23.00
17.00
18.00
33.00
29.00
79.00
48.00
47.00
17.00
16.00
45.00
19.00
16.00
21.00
19.00
22.00
52.20
23.80
18.80
28.66
40.70
19.80
39.80
22.10
36.30
21.40
85.70
85.70
39.90
40.00
23.80
76.90
26.40
72.10
28.10
33.20
18.80
18.10
26.60
22.30
35.70
14.10
C-10
-------
Fable C-2
SEDIMENT SAMPLE DAIA - NOVEMBER/DECEMBER 1985
Location
FMH
FMH
FMH
FMH
FMH
FMH
FMH
FMH
FMH
FMH
FMH
FMH
FMH
FMH
DMH
FMH
FMH
DMH
FMH
FMH
FMH
FMH
FMH
FMH
FMH
FMH
FMH
FMH
FMH
FMH
FMH
FMH
DMH
FMK
FMK
FMK
FMK
FMK
FMK
FMK
FMK
DMK
FMK
FMK
FMK
FMK
DMK
Number
01
01
02
02
03
03
04
04
05
05
06
06
07
07
07
08
08
08
09
09
10
10
11
11
12
12
13
13
14
14
15
15
15
01
01
01
02
02
02
03
03
03
03
04
04
04
04
Depth
A
8
A
a
A
a
A
8
A
8
A
a
A
a
a
A
8
a
A
8
A
a
A
a
A
a
A
8
A
a
A
8
A
A
a
c
A
a
c
A
8
8
C
A
8
C
C
Lead
(mg/kg)
1,860.00
61.80
96.10
51.40
46.70
6.30
16.70
19.70
103.00
19.80
251.00
<20.4
109.00
39.30
31.40
61.00
53.60
32.80
136.00
31.20
31.80
8.90
185.65
19.60
250.00
108.00
510.00
82.40
820.00
72.80
137.60
32.20
183.80
10,900.00
12,500.00
7.80
139.00
1 ,280.00
12.30
115.00
81.60
65.70
60.20
1,270.00
115.00
3.78
2.51
Cadmiun
(mg/kg)
1.78
1.21
2.13
<.53
<.62
<.45
0.49
<.43
<.75
<.55
3.74
2.85
1.35
0.70
0.81
0.70
<.54
<.53
<.54
<.38
<.78
<.39
1.93
<.56
<1.76
<.89
5.07
0.22
<2.74
2.99
<2.04
<2.51
<2.62
1.15
1.51
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
Antimony
(mg/kg)
7.82
1.06
0.71
<0.21
3.00
<.18
<.20
<.17
10.7
0.22
48.10
1.63
5.00
<.22
•C.20
1.29
<.21
<.21
0.76
<.15
2.33
<.16
14.00
<.23
5.98
0.71
16.20
3.86
42.30
2.99
2.04
1.01
4.19
36.20
77.40
<12
<12
27.50
<12
<12
<12
<12
<12
<12
<12
<12
<12
PH
Units
4.79
3.07
3.34
3.45
3.72
3.38
3.44
3.40
3.38
3.44
3.71
2.79
3.49
3.47
3.50
3.48
3.46
3.33
3.44
3.52
3.69
3.60
4.35
3.39
3.60
3.73
3.43
3.18
3.59
3.26
4.20
4.02
4.21
7.05
6.00
4.35
5.10
5.50
4.45
4.30
4.35
4.55
4.30
4.50
4.05
4.30
4.25
S Mater
58.00
53.40
39.30
16.00
35.80
18.40
24.60
20.40
49.60
27.10
85.10
80.90
51.50
33.80
30.20
47.40
29.00
27.50
32.40
17.40
49.20
14.60
53.40
29.70
76.80
62.50
84.40
84.70
86.70
81.60
84.50
83.90
85.80
30.00
32.00
17.00
20.00
33.00
12.00
28.00
24.00
23.00
21.00
36.00
21.00
17.00
16.00
C-9
-------
Tible D-1
WATER LEVEL ELEVATIONS -
SURFICIAL AQUIFER SYSTEM
Mel I No,
HM-03C
HM-06C
MW-09C
MW-10C
MW-UC
MW-12C
MW-13C
MW-14C
MW-16C
MW-17C
MH-18C
MW-19C
MW-20C
MW-21C
MW-22C
MW-23C
(tell Head Elevation
(tat above MSL)
133.16
133.57
143.19
138.80
142.08
137.10
132.90
134.93
134.08
131.83
130.21
131.06
131.11
133.06
136.63
140.39
Water Level
(feet below TOO
3.99
6.94
6.67
9.24
6.67
6.15
4.12
6.24
9.62
4.87
2.36
3.37
2.89
4.57
10.66
3.63
Water Level
tfeet above MSL)
129.17
126.63
136.52
129.56
135.41
130.95
128.78
128.69
124.46
126.98
127.85
127.69
128.22
128.49
125.97
136.76
D-2
-------
APPENDIX 0
SROUNDWATER
PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL
ANALYTICAL DATA
D-l
recvdea caper
-------
Table D-3
WATER LEVEL ELEVATIONS -
FLQRIDAN AQUIFER SYSTEM
Hell No.
MM-01A
MH-03A
HW-04A
MW-05A
MM-06A
MM-09A*
MM-12A*
MW-13A*
MM-14A
MM-21A
MM-22A
DM-01
OW-02
Mail Head Elevation
(feet above HSL)
147.10
132.98
135.10
132.20
133.66
143.75
138.60
133.11
135.21
134.14
137.30
144.36
136.02
Mater Level
(feet below TOO
46.04
32.96
35.62
32.67
33.72
27.50
' 30.43
9.35
35.19
34.91
38.92
44.26
35.68
Mater Level
(feet above MSl)
101.06
100.02
99.48
99.53
99.94
116.25
108.17
123.76
100.02
99.23
98.38
100.10
100.34
•These wells ire considered to be open to the intermediate aquifer systea.
See Section 3.4.1.
D-4
-------
Table D-2
WATER LEVEL ELEVATIONS -
INTERMEDIATE AQUIFER SYSTEM
Nell No.
MM-01B
MM-028
MM-03B
MM-03BB
MM-058
MM-Q6B
MM-07B
MM-088
MM-09B
MM- 128
MM- 136
MM- 148
MM- 158
MM-218
MM-228
Mell Head Elevation
(feet above MSL)
147.27
131.93
133.33
133.02
132.21
132.30
136.68
144.71
143.63
138.53
132.93
135.77
131.46
134.32
136.19
Mater Level
(feet below TOO
44.87
7.03
9.62
11.34
7.56
5.87
34.33
22.47
8.00
22.50
11.65
8.80
3.32
8.33
35.27
Mater Level
(feet above MSL)
102.40
124.09
123.71
121.68
124.65
126.43
102.35
122.24
135.63
116.03
121.28
126.97
128.14
125.99
100.92
0-3
caper
-------
(able D-5
SURFICIAL AQUIFER SYSIEM - FIELD PARAMEIERS
O
I 4 E
November - December
Number
NW-OX
HW-06C
HW-09C
HN-10C
HM-11C
MW-12C
MX-13C
MW-14C
HM-16C
HM-17C
NM-18C
HM-19C
HM-20C
MW-21C
MW-22C
MW-23C
Nell
Depth
(feet)
10.0
21.0
10.0
14.0
12.0
15.0
12.0
10.0
10.0
6.5
8.0
8.0
5.5
21.0
26.0
17.0
Casing
Depth
(feet)
5.0
11.0
5.0
9.0
7.0
10.0
7.0
5.0
5.0
1.5
3.0
3.0
0.5
11.0
16.0
7.0
pH
(units)
4.60
8.20
5.20
6.00
6.00
6.00
5.00
6.00
3.50
6.20
5.80
5.00
5.00
4.60
6.00
6.00
Conduc-
tivity
(uMhos)
615.00
5.00
170.00
517.00
370.00
660.00
372.00
822.00
3002.00
45.00
455.00
402.00
140.00
27.00
105.00
10.00
1985
Temper-
ature
CC)
22.16
22.47
25.00
22.40
21.30
22.96
20.12
22.43
24.06
19.90
18.82
19.21
18.52
21.47
24.35
21.02
FDER
August - October
PH
(units)
4.50
—
5.50
6.20
4.80
4.00
3.40
4.20
3.30
5.50
J.OO
3.50
3.20
—
—
—
Conduc-
tivity
(umhos)
485.00
—
280.00
335.00
305.00
750.00
660.00
570.00
7500.00
83.00
471.00
385.00
269.00
—
—
—
1983
Temper-
ature
CC)
22.00
—
25.00
24.00
25.00
22.00
22.00
22.00
22.00
--
—
—
—
—
—
—
-- Not taken
-------
Table 0-4
HYDROLOGIC PARAMETERS
SAPP BATTERY MONITORING WELLS
SLUG TEST DATA
Hell No.
MW-Q6A
MW-06B
MW-06C
MW-12A
MW-12B
MW-12C
MW-22A
MW-22B
MW-22C
SPECIFIC
Tranamisaivity
(T)
(gpd/ft)
9968.57
93.07
127.28
223.03
4.57
147.95
10491.54
44.09
210.95
CAPACITY TEST DATA
Hydraulic
Conductivity
(K)
(cm/sec)
9.56 x ID"4
5.58 x 10"5
1.53 x 10"*
7.64 x 10"5
1.57 x 10"6
2.36 x 10"*
1.01 x 10"'
3.35 x 10'5
1.69 x 10"*
Specific Capacity
Mell No.
MW-02B
MW-06B
MW-14A
HN.14C
(SO
(gp»/ft)
0.620
0.081
1.690
0.068
Seepage
Velocity
(ft/yr)
0.90
2.31
0.99
0.99
2.03 x 10"2
12.23
10.41
1.39
1.09
Mell Yield
(WY)
(gp»)
16.12
2.67
84.50
0.476
D-5
-------
(able 0-7
FL OR I DAN AQUIFER SYSICM - FIELD PARAMETERS
CD
E 4 E
November - December
Number
DM-01
DW-02
HH-01A
HW-0)A
MN-04A
MM-05A
HM-06A
MW-09A*
HH-12A*
MW-13A*
MW-14A
HH-2IA
HM-22A
Mell
Depth
(feet)
188
118
130
190
1)0
110
1)4
127
127
115
BO
1)1
1)4
Caaing
Depth
(feat)
84
106
110
170
110
10)
124
117
117
105
70
121
124
PH
(unite)
6.00
6.00
6.00
6.40
6.00
6.50
6.00
9.00
6.00
6.00
6.00
6.00
6.00
Conduc-
t ivlt y
(umhoa)
202.00
212.00
210.00
440.00
175.00
57.00
92.00
200.00
200.00
1)72.00
J20.00
262.00
375.00
1985
temper-
ature
en
21.91
2). 26
24.9)
22.00
20.48
20.91
22.20
—
22.88
22. )1
20.96
21.75
22.20
EDER
August - October
PH
(unite)
5.8,
7.5
8.00
7.70
8.20
7.60
8.00
--
—
--
4.30
7.00
—
—
Conduc-
tivity
(unhoa)
240.00
170.00
250.00
)70.00
320.00
295.00
--
—
—
1040.00
2 BO. 00
—
—
1983
Temper-
ature
CC)
21.00,
22.00
22.50
21.00
22.00
21.50
21.50
--
—
--
22.00
21.50
—
--
These Hells are conaldered to be open to the intermediate aquifer system. See Section 3.4.1.
— Not taken
-------
Table 0-6
INIERHCDIATE AQUIFER SYSIEM - FIELD PARAHCIERS
E 4 E
November - December
Nuabar
NM-01B
HM-02B
HM-038
MN-03BB
MH-05B
MM-06B
MM-07B
HW-08B
HM-09B
HH-12B
MX- 156
HN-14B
MN-15B
NH-21B
HH-22B
Mall
Depth
(feat)
53
35
65
too
40
40
54
50
53
60
65
48
30
60
62
Caaing
Depth
(faat)
36
25
55
90
30
30
48
40
43
50
55
38
20
50
52
pH
(unite)
6.00
6.00
6.00
3.00
6.00
9.00
6,30
7.00
6.70
6.00
8.00
6.00
4.50
5.50
6.50
Conduc-
tivity
(uBhos)
340.00
152.00
2275.00
4032.00
110.00
312.00
660.00
670.00
220.00
187.00
1222.00
167.00
467.00
22.00
265.00
1985
leoper-
ature
CO
21.45
21.95
23.45
23.10
21.68
22.15
—
23.07
—
23.07
22.72
22.87
20.65
21.65
22.67
FOER
August - October 1983
PH
(units)
7.90
5.80
3.50
3.50
5.90
6.00
8.00
6.50
—
--
6.10
6.10
4.00
--
—~
Conduc-
tivity
( Mhos)
205.00
40.00
7800.00
10200.00
60.00
53.00
310.00
59.00
—
«
160.00
420.00
680.00
~
~—
leaper-
ature
CO
22.00
21.00
22.00
22.00
22.00
22.00
22.00
22.00
—
--
22.00
22.00
22.00
—
~~
-- Not taken
-------
Table D-9
SUREICIAL AQUIFER SYSTEM METALS DATA - NOVEMBER/DECEMBER 1985
(I 4 E)
O
H-«
O
Metal Concent rat iona
Nutber
HH-03C
HM-06C
HM-09C
HM-10C
MM- ire*
MW-11C
MW-12C
MM-13C
HM-14C
MH-16C
MH-17C
MM-18C
MW-19C
HH-2QC
MM-21C
MH-22C
MM-23C
MH-23C*
Aluilnui
_
52.600
~
35.100
45.200
5.010
27.600
1.590
3.540
265.000
0.643
73.100
17.300
11.600
56.500
2.460
3.530
7.760
Ant inony
0.118
<0.060
<0.060
<0.060
<0.060
<0.060
<0.600
<0.060
<0.600
<0.060
<0.060
<0.060
<0.060
<0.060
<0.060
<0.600
<0.060
<0.060
Areenic
0.282
<0.005
0.006
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
0.009
<0.005
<0.050
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.050
<0.005
<0.005
CadMiun
0.004
<0.001
<0.001
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
0.014
<0.005
<0.005
0.076
<0.001
0.023
0.002
0.006
0.001
<0.005
0.007
<0.005
(PP-)
Lead
4.960
0.046
6.270
0.257
0.290
0.021
0.413
0.061
3.720
0.286
0.027
0.059
0.013
0.043
0.022
<0.005
0.007
<0.005
Manganeae
<0.015
—
6.960
5.910
2.240
4.920
0.232
28.100
6.940
<0.015
0.722
0.276
0.119
0.028
<0.015
<0.015
0.033
SeleniiM
<0.050
<0.010
<0.005
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.005
<0.005
<0.050
<0.050
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
•Duplicate ample
-- Not analyzed
-------
labie D-8
HESIOENUAt WEILS - FIEID PARAMEIERS
2
D
o
I
Number
GM-OI
CM-02
CM-0)
CM-04
CW-OS
GM-07
GM-08
GH-09
CM- 10
GH-II
CM- 12
GW-15
CM- 14
GW-IS
CM- 17
CM- IB
CM- 19
GH-20
GM-21
GM-22
CM- 26
CM-27
GM-28
CM- 29
CW-W
Hell
Depth
(feet)
ISO
—
2)0
2*0
—
128
172
IS5
..
160
60
--
—
—
--
—
__
126
_-
—
—
--
._
—
—
November
pH
(units)
6.80
7.80
7.70
7. SO
7.60
7.80
7.20
7.40
8.20
8.00
7.60
8.00
8.10
7.70
7.80
7.80
7.50
7.40
7.80
7. SO
7.80
8.00
7.00
7.80
7.60
[ 4 E
- December
Conduc-
tivity
(unhos)
200.00
160.00
180.00
240.00
200.00
180.00
66.00
100.00
IBO.OO
160.00
J90.00
160.00
140.00
180.00
160.00
140.00
22S.OO
220.00
160.00
220.00
180.00
120.00
160.00
160. Od
220.00
I98S
temper-
ature
Cc)
20.00
21.00
19.00
19. SO
20.00
21.00
21.00
18. SO
20.00
17.00
18.00
19. SO
19.00
19. SO
19.00
19.00
20.00
17.00
20. SO
18.00
19. SO
19. SO
20. SO
19.00
19.00
August
pH
(units)
7.10
7.20
7.50
7.10
--
7.)0
6.00
7.40
7.70
7.20
7. 10
--
—
—
—
—
—
7.10
~
—
—
—
--
—
~~
FOER
- October
Conduc-
tivity
(uahos)
22S.OO
220.00
22S.OO
260.00
--
240.00
19.00
22.00
2SO.OO
280.00
40S.OO
—
--
—
—
—
—
270.00
—
—
--
—
--
—
"
I9B)
Temper-
ature
CC)
22.00
21. SO
21.00
21. SO
--
22.00
25.00
22.00
21.00
22.00
20.00
—
—
--
—
—
—
25.00
--
—
—
—
--
--
-------
Fable D-11
FLORIDAN AQUIFER SYSTEM MUMS DAI A - NOVEHBER/DECEHBER 1985
(E & t)
a
i
Metal Concentrations
Number
OW-01
OH-02
HN-01A
HH-03A
MM-04A
MW-05A
HW-06A
MW-09A*
HW-12A"
MW-13A'
MW-14A
HH-21A
MW-22A"
MM-22A
Aluminua
0.809
1.120
1.730
—
0.559
J.550
1.040
16.600
115.000
2.5BO
5.260
7.720
1.0)0
1.490
Antimony
<0.060
<0.060
<0.600
<0.060
<0.600
<0.600
<0.060
<0.060
<0.060
<0.060
<0.600
<0.060
<0.060
<0.060
Araenic
0.018
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
0.014
0.092
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
Cadmiu*
<0.005
0.026
<0.005
0.003
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
0.004
0.011
<0.005
0.002
<0.001
0.001
(PP")
Lead
1.830
1.500
3.680
0.609
0.045
0.080
0.051
0.463
0.065
0.168
0.389
0.029
0.012
0.027
Manganese
2.460
0.173
0.030
—
0.246
0.030
0.113
0.687
0.849
0.876
0.557
0.169
0.047
0.055
Selenium
0.008
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.050
—
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
•Ihese wells are considered to be open to the intermediate aquifer system.
••Duplicate sample
— Not analyzed
See Section 3.4.1.
-------
fable D-10
INfERHEDIAfE AQUIFER SYSttM MtlALS DATA - NOVEMBER/DECEMBER 1985
(t A E)
o
i
Metal Concent rat ions
Nuaber
HH-01B
MM-02B
MN-02B*
MW-03B
HH-036B
MW-05B
MX- 068
HH-07B
HW-OBB
MM-09B
HN-12B
MW-13B
HM-14B
MW-15B
MW-21B
HN-22B
Alimnua
8.940
1.000
0.986
58.400
—
<0.200
2.210
280.000
10.400
870.000
987.000
1.J80
5.410
18.900
14.200
4.600
Ant mony
<0.600
<0.060
<0.060
<0.060
<0.060
<0.060
<0.060
<0.060
<0.060
<0.600
<0.600
<0.060
<0.600
<0.060
<0.060
<0.600
Arsenic
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
0.021
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.050
<0.050
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.050
Cadmiim
<0.005
<0.001
<0.001
0.021
0.246
<0.005
<0.005
0.032
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
0.007
0.002
<0.005
(PP-)
Lead
0.650
0.011
0.010
4.280
1.280
0.010
0.015
0.509
0.761
0.546
0.501
0.149
0.242
0.021
0.020
0.006
Manganese
0.161
<0.015
<0.015
0.493
—
<0.015
0.025
17.400
0.060
0.459
0.502
0.184
0.184
0.415
0.037
0.110
Selenium
<0.005
<0.010
<0.010
<0.500
<0.050
<0.010
<0.050
<0.050
<0.005
<0.050
<0.005
<0.050
<0.005
<0.010
<0.005
<0.005
•Duplicate aaapla
— Not analyzed
-------
Fable 0-1Z (Cant.)
Metal Concentrations (ppn)
Nuaber
GH-Z1
CM- 22
GW-26
GH-27
GH-28
CM- 28*
CM- 29
CM- 30
Aluainui
<0.200
<0.200
<0.200
<0.200
<0.200
<0.200
<0.200
<0.200
Antinony
<0.060
<0.060
<0.060
<0.060
<0.060
<0.060
<0.060
<0.060
Arsenic
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.00»
<0.005
<0.00»
CadMluM
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
Lead
0.010
<0.005
-------
fable D-12
RESIDENTIAL WELL METALS DAIA - NOVEMBER/DECEMBER 1985
(t A E)
o
i
t—•
OJ
Metal Concentrations (pp>)
Number
GH-Ot
GW-02
GW-03
GH-04
CW-05
GH-07
GW-08
CM-09
CW-09*
GM-10
CM- 11
GW-12
GW-12*
GW-1)
CM- 14
CW-1S
CM- 17
GM-18
CM* 19
GM-20
AluMinui
<0.200
<0.200
C0.200
<0.200
<0.200
<0.200
<0.200
<0.200
<0.200
<0.200
<0.200
<0.200
<0.200
<0.200
<0.200
<0.200
<0.200
<0.200
<0.200
<0.200
Antiaony
<0.060
<0.060
<0.060
<0.060
<0.060
<0.060
<0.060
<0.060
<0.060
<0.060
<0.060
<0.060
<0.060
<0.060
<0.060
<0.060
<0.060
<0.060
<0.060
<0.060
Araenic
<0.005
<0.005
-------
table D-14
INTERMEDIATE AQUIFER SYSTEM METALS DAIA - AUCUS[/OCTOBER 1983
(fOER)
o
I
Metal Concentrations (pom)
Nunber
HH-01B
HH-02B
MU-03B
MH-03BB
HH-05B
MM-06B
MW-07B*
HH-OBB
HH-13B
MM-14B
MW-15B
Aluitnui
2.000
0.970
880.000
100.000
4.000
3.500
1.300
<0.700
0.800
0.400
O.BBO
14.000
Antiwmy
0.002
<0.001
NA
NA
<0.001
<0.001
-------
Table 0-1)
SUHf ICIAL AQUIFER 5YSIIM HCIALS DAIA - AUCUSt/OCIOBER 1983
(FDER)
I
en
Metal Concentrations (poa)
Number
HH-03C
MM-09C
HN-10C
HM-1IC
HH-12C
MM- DC
MM-14C
MH-16C
MW-17C
NM-16C
HH-19C
HM-20C
Aluaunua
2.600
0.600
4.000
1.900
400.000
8.700
4.100
860.000
1.000
73.200
20.200
14.900
Ant lawny
0.008
0.003
0.004
<0.001
<0.001
0.004
0.003
0.002
<0.200
<0.200
<0.200
<0.200
Arsenic
0.092
0.003
0.002
0.002
0.001
0.008
0.001
0.001
<0.010
<0.010
-------
CD
(able D-16
RESIDtNHAL MCLl METALS DATA - AUGUSf/SCPrCHBCR 1983
Metal Concentrations (pom)
Nunber
CM-01
01-02
GW-OJ
GM-04
GW-07
GW-08
GM-09
CM- 10
CW-11
CW-12
CM- 20
AluMinui
y.6oo
0.050
0.040
0.070
0.920
1.300
0.180
0.060
0.130
7.100
0.040
Antinony
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
Arsenic
0.005
0.007
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.003
0.002
0.001
0.002
CadniuH
0.004
<0.001
-------
lable 0-15
FlOR IDAN AQUIFER SYSTEM MEFALS DATA - AUGUST/OCTOBER 1983
(FDER)
Metal Concentrations (pp»)
Number
MH-OIA
MW-03A
MH-04A
MW-05A
MW-1JA*
MH-14A
OH-01
DW-02"
Aluainu*
0.080
0.880
0.210
44.000
210.000
2.400
3.000
0.600
<0.700
Antimony
<0.001
0.002
<0.001
0.002
<0.001
0.001
<0.001
0.005
<0.200
Arsenic
0.002
0.002
0.001
0.005
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.002
<0.010
CadMiun
<0.00t
<0.001
<0.001
0.034
0.001
0.001
<0.001
0.005
<0.010
Lead
0.005
0.100
0.003
0.100
0.017
0.100
0.014
2.100
0.069
Manganese
0.010
0.060
0.030
0.090
2.900
0.060
0.070
0.160
<0.025
SelemuB
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
* 0.001
0.004
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
NA
Nickel
0.007
0.012
<0.001
0.200
0.033
0.021
0.009
0.042
NA
Copper
0.024
0.031
0.023
0.080
0.072
0.032
0.024
0.130
NA
•MW-13A la considered to be open to the intermediate aquifer system. See Section 3.4.1
••First and second lines present August and October 1983 data, respectively.
-------
•Table D-12B
RESIDENTIAL WILL METALS DATA - JANUARY, 1985 (ESE)
ENVIftOMlENlU SCIENCE I ENGINEERING
MOJECC NimiER t*UII«0
flflD GROUP: StGUl
in suiPiESs ui
01/01/15 SI«IU$: flNH
fROJECI NIK SIPP IIIIERT
PROJECI lUNIttRi
HE 10 GROUP LEIOERi D.lKIOR
SIMPLE NUMBERS
PmnEIERS SldKI •
GU-I GM-I
tlltOO UI10I
GM-1 GU-t
t)«OI UltOI
GH-5
GH-)
t)I10>
GH-I
«)110)
GM-1
4TI10I
GU-IO
* 12 101
GU-II
tlltIO
BEIHOD •
DUE
IINE
IIKUINIU,I.(HC/L-
CICOI)
LEIO,IOIIlfUC/Lt
COPPER, iOIUIUC/L>
INUNONt,IOIIKUG/l)
o CIOIUUM»IOIH
i
o NICKEL, I,IUG/LI
IRSENK,IOIIl(UG/ll
1ING*NESE,(UG/U
IIUHINUH,IOIII(UG/II
SELENIUM, lOIUIUG/LI
PH,FIELO(SIO UNIISI
SP.CONO.,F1ELI
IUHMOS/CHI
UIIER IEHP
-------
Table D-12A
RESIDENTIAL WELL METALS DATA/MARCH 1986 (E & E)
Metal Concent rations
Nunber
GW-01
GW-02
GW-03
GW-04
GW-05
GW-06
GW-07
GW-08
GW-09
GW-1Q
GW-11
GW-12
GW-13
GW-14
GW-15
GW-16
GW-17
GW-18
GW-20
GW-21
GW-22
GW-26
GW-27
GW-28
GW-30
GW-31
Aluminum
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
0.261
<0.2
<0.2
0.302
0.205
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
Ant inony
<0.06
<0.06
<0.06
<0.06
<0.06
<0.06
<0.06
<0.06
<0.06
<0.06
<0.06
<0.06
<0.06
<0.06
<0.06
<0.06
<0.06
<0.06
<0.06
<0.06
<0.06
<0.06
<0.06
<0.06
<0.06
<0.06
Arsenic
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
-------
fable D-I2B (Cont.)
(NVlROWiEMUL StUNCC t ENdNEEIINC
o
I
INJ
PROJECI NunaiR atut2to
MELD tROUP: SIGUI
PlRlltEIERSi Ul SMPIES: All
CU-22
rmnfCERS SIORCI i Win
(H-21 6U>2)
«)2t2S «?2*2i
CH-21
412121
HilriOD I
U4IE
HUE
UUUN1I1,I.(HC/1-
CUI1I
lE10.IOIU
COPPtMOlUIM/l)
INlIHONTifOfUSI
I/JO/IS 1
II2»
MO 12
0
10)1 O.I
0
I0«2 <5.0
0
lOt)
-------
IZ-0
S I
s :" §
r |° £ i 5 2 f = I i I 2sj
~
o c» a o o e »
e 9- ** « f %tt •»
S» •
2 i
S -
S *!
A A A A A ^ ^ rv T
• * • • • • • Wl «* •• «•
A A A
S^
•W
• M» *V
A A A W» •• •—
•- ^ •• ^ O W»
• «••••««»
§ ""5
3 r~n
•• mm
m w
S^ 0t •*
•*K O
« ^ fSi I JO
-------
Table D-I2C (Cont.)
CNVltONKMU SCIENCE t ENCINEERIN6
PROJECI NUMBER 8)228200
FIflO CROUPS StPPM
PmrE1ERS> HI SUlPLESs HI
05/01/84 SUIUS: FUH
PROJCCI NIKE SIPP BMIERI
PROJECf NINJCER* RUSS IOUCN
FIELD CROUP LEADERS ion PIRN
SMPLC NUMBERS
PlRtNCIERS SIOJC1 •
II
K4110
12
mm
1)
))4112
14
mm
1) 14 1)
J54114 IMll) J541I4
18
J5411)
11
))4116
20
J54111
HCfHM •
otic
HUE
UNUlNllTtl.lHC/l-
CUO)»
SULFIU (Itt/ll
SUIFIOEIPC/L-SI
ictD,ioin
-------
0
64? »?7 0'6f 49? 76? 44? »(7 Ot? %?7 ((7 »6
CO? f07 %MI 7'07 9*41 »*0? 0*0? 4*0? 0*17 1*17 01 111 Wll HI""
0
On 09*( 04*4 0»*l Oft Oft 09*t Oft 0»*l 04H 00%
OM> OM> OM> OM> OM> 0*1> OM> OM> OM> OM> I%II
0
04> 04> 04> 04> 04> 04> 04> OS* 04> Oi» 4011
0
(> (> 91 t> 00( (> (t t> t> (> «OI
0
t'0> C0> (*0> t*0> f» (*0> (*0> fO> (*0> (*0> 7001
0
0"9> 0*9> 0*9> 0*9> 0*9> 0*9> 0*9> 0*9> 0*9> 0*9> (901
0
4*0 4*0> 4*0> 4'0> 6*0 4*0> 4*0> 4*0> 4'0> S'0> (701 «1/inil»101'uniHO»l
0*I> 0*l> 0*1> 0*l> 0*I> 0*1> 0*I> 0*I> 0*1> 0*l> (601
0
0*9> 0*9> 0*9> 0*9> 0*9> 0*9> 0*9> 0*9> 0*9> 0"9> 7*01
?-i 5»( o-o OM> f9 o*t> f% ft o-t> ft 1401 n/9nn»iai«o»ii
0
?0*0> ?0'0> 50*0 ?0*0> ?0*0> 70*0> ?0*0> 70*0> ?0*0> ?0'0> S»( tS-VIUHOUinS
|> |> t> % !>!>!>? 7 t 4*6 IV1HI 31Uins
0 1(01*1
471 401 » 171 4%1 »?1 6tl til 601 (01 0(» -V»iri«llI«l|l»»Tf
0011 0(01 046 006 0061 04>I OKI 0091 0041 00»I 3UH
%t/9/% »«/9/» %t/9/» %8/9/% %B/4/% »V/4/» %9/4/V %B/4/% %l/4/» »«/4/» 31*0
• OOM1W
6019S( 90I94( (0194( 90I9St 401941 »OI94( tOt9« 701*4t I0194( 001941 I I3DOIS
01 6 I ( 9 t » I ? I
J1JMIS
NH4 HOI t»30in jnOR9 013IJ 111
-------
Table D-12D
COWARISON Of RESIDENTIAL WELL LEAD DATA
FOR ALL SAW I INC EPISODES
(ppb)
Location
GW-1
CM- 2
GW-3
GW-4
GW-5
GM-6
GW-7
GM-8
GW-9
GM-10
GX-11
GW-12
GW-13
GM-1A
GW-15
GW-16
GW-17
GM-18
GM-19
GM-20
GX-21
GW-22
CM- 26
GM-27
GW-2B
GM-29
GW-30
W-31
FDER
1983
14.0
5.0
4.0
5.0
MS
NS
8.0
7.0
5.0
6.0
5.0
11.0
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
4.0
NS
NS
NS
NS
6.0
NS
NS
NS
ESE
1984
3.9
<3.0
3.9
4.7
<3.0
6.9
<3.0
<3.0
3.5
5.2
<3.0
11.6
7.7
6.4
3.5
3.1
3.1
3.9
3.1
3.5
<3.0
3.9
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
ESE
1/1985
17.0
<3.0
7.5
<3.0
<3.0
NS
6.0
<3.0
6.6
<3.0
<3.0
23.7
0.0
<3.0
<3.0
4.5
10.0
5.6
3.2
<3.0
3.7
<3.0
12.1
3.2
12.1
NS
NS
NS
E 4 E
11/1985
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
10.0
NS
15.0
22.0
12.0
12.0
<5.0
13.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
NS
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
7.0
10.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
23.0
<5.0
NS
E & E
3/1986
21.0
<5.0
16.0
<5.0
<5.0
NS
<5.0
<5.0
12.0
6.0
9.0
24.0
<5.0
<5.0
7.0
NS
5.0
<5.0
<5.0
6.0
5.0
8.0
8.0
7.0
<5.0
NS
<5.0
<5.0
NS = Not
D-26
-------
•s«
o.a>a>
S£S £
s?IJ i
"I 3
^ iw UJ O
«•» * v e • • •
** •* • •« ^ ••
« e v v
i^ t -a • »
v v v v w
H °
o 5
Ij
5;
-J 1J
-• ^ S
3
u
0-25
-------
Larry M.Jacobs & Associates, Inc.
Consulting Ceotechnical Engineers* /
328 EAST GAOSDEN STREET • PENSACOLA. FLORIDA 32501 • 904/434-0846
FIELD BORING LOG
For:
Name of
Project N» • 85-289
Weather
Page No. 1 «* L
MW-9B
Ground Elev.
Time 1500 SD
fir
(-U Next Uay
S*B»U
No.
Staple
Depth— Fwt
From
To
Depth Stratum
Fe«t
From
0.0
1.0
10.0
18.0
38.0
43.0
To
1.0
10.0
18.0
38.0
43.0
55.0
Vtraal CUMifieatim
MW-9B
Brown silty sond with battery chip fill
Battery chips becoming clayey ot 10.0'
Light or medium grey sandy clay, very wet
Medium grey highly plastic clay-clay
loosened up about 24.0 feet.
Medium grey slightly sandy/gravel clay very
Medium grey coarse sandy clay, wet slurry v«
some milkey white and clear quartz well
rounded pea sized gravel
Comments: HNu = Oppm to 43.0*
HNu = 3 ppm after 43.0'
NOTE: 55.0 feet is bottom of hole because
ria was bendina at 55.0' where sandy water
occurred. Afraid of damaging riq. Also
bentonite oluq used in bottom of hollow ster
to keep sand out of auger.
Construction:
1. 2" PVC Triloc with seal
2. 10.0' 0-01" slotted screen
3. 0' 16/40 sand-53.0' PVC in ground. Hoi.
caved in to 36.0'-37.0'
•Blowt Per «•
lit
wet s
ith
i
2na
irry
1
1
II
9n)
• ««»•» tl »n« «f IM Ik lummur Inn* u incau t» tnrt i in inu-t
Remarks: Field logs documented by Ecology and Environment
No. Sacks Drilling Mud:.
Type Drill Rig:
-E-2
Field Technician
-------
APPENDIX E
DRILLER'S LOGS
E-l
eQ pdper
-------
Larry M.Jacobs & Associates, Inc.
Consulting Ceotechnical Engineers /
328 EAST GAOSOEN STREET • PENSACOO. FLORIDA 32501 • 904/434-0846
FIELD BORING LOG
For:
NfjrtD of Prftjt-f Sapp Bcrterv
Boring NA M w-*< I p Fi^iH Technician -
Pagr Nn
na^ 11 -8-85
rjp ^vf **r E
«f
Time 1030 SO
[/JO I-U
u.
flunpl.
No.
Sample
Depth— -Feet
from
T»
Depth Stratum
FM(
Proa
0.0
2.0
7.0
25.0
42.5
45.0
59.0
41.0
T«
2.0
7.0
25.0
42.5
45.0
59.0
61.0
62.0
Ylraftl CliUtiflcAtioB
MW-21B
Black/brown sandy soil
Tan/orange medium sub-angular sandy clay
Light grey and orange medium sandy clay
with sparse black cinder fragments
Liqht qrey and orange medium sandy clay
Gravel with same qrey white sandy clay
as above. Note: Bit grinding at 42.5'
Light grey medium sandy clay
Milkey white quartz gravel with grey and wh
Light grey medium sandy clay
NOTE: Revert Mix: VariFlo, Soluble Polym
American Colloid Co.
1. Had cave-in as tremmie operations in
progress so sand packed thicker.
2. Also well was plugging between 18.0' an<
20.0' deeo due to large diameter hole to sm<
diameter
Construction:
1. Sand oack and cove in : 23.0'
2. Bentonite pellets 1/4"«2.0'
3. Grout rqix = 34.0'
•Blows Per V
IM
te cl<
eer,
ill
2m
f
M
•( um .t IK m t»mmn
Jfl uuhu u «n.« 1 m i»m
Remarks:
m.ur $ufa: Larry M. Jacobs d Associates, Ir
logs documented by Ecology and Environment 2r\ller:
M ( - *fl . _ ... , ----- l—l.-^L^^—
Modde*
No. Sacks Drilling Mud:.
Type Drill Rig:
E-4
BY.
Method: Rotary with revert
Field Technician
-------
Larry M. Jacobs & Associates, Inc.
Consulting Geotechnicjl Engineers /
328 EAST GAOS06N STREET • PENSACOLA. FLORIDA 32501 * 904/434-0846
FIELD BORING LOG
For:
Name of Project!.
Boring v* MW-9B FJ..M
Ground Elev —
Sa Battcry
n*ti.
Time 1500 SD
Datum
* Water
t-U Next uay
StmpU
Ho.
3S
D«pth-
rrem 1
pi: —
-PMt
T*
IWU
Worn
•t
T»
Vbiut CUadfiemUra
4. 2.0' Bentonitc Pellets (Geo-Pel)
5. 25.0' Grout
6. 13.0' concrete with pad
•B!o«
Ut
n Per
2no
8-
Sid
_ , Field logs documented by Ecology and Environment
No. Sacks Drilling Mud:.
Type Drill Rig:
E-3
BY.
Field Technician
-------
Larry M. Jacobs & Associates, Inc. /
Consulting Ceote c h n i c a 1 Enfineers /
328 EAST GAOSOEN STREET • PENSACOLA, FLORIDA 32501 • 904/434-0646
FIELD BORING LOG
85-289
Nimfl ff P«J.^. Sopp Battery
MW 1 70 «»• i
Ground EIflv o»tn?ti
Wtither
. , -n. Pagr No
Gr. Wftter El
2 „, 2
Time 1010 SD
UOU t-D
a*npi«
Ho.
5=pi;
D»ptk— Ft«t
From
To
FMt
From
To
VUaal CUttUiutiM
MW-1ZB
Comments: Red/brown layers in upper 5'-15
show various tints
Construction:
1. 2" PVC Triloc with seal 63.0'
2. 10.0' 0.01" slotted screen
3. U.O1 16/40 sand. Cove-in at 9.0'-10.0' fi
in after 1 bag of sand
4. Bentonite slurry 2.0' bentonite pellets (G
5. 35.0' grout
6. 2.0' concrete with pad
•Blow* Per «•
lit
lied
*-Pelj
2oa
«
!!
II
1!
II
3id
*t kM«( if la Ik taBMr 4rop»M M IMIW> u »r>,, 1 in •»lll-
Remarks: Field logs documented by Ecology ond
Sub: Lorry M. Jacobs & Associates, Inc.
Driller: Jim Dudley
Environment
No. Sacks Drilling Mud:_
Type Drill Rig:_
. E-6
BY.
•Itflpers; R. Mqddox, J. Pounroln
Method: Rotary with revert
Field Technician
-------
Larry M. Jacobs & Associates, Inc.
Consulting GeotechnicaIEngineers
328 EAST GAOSOEN STREET • PENSACOLA. FLORIDA 32501 • 904/434-0846
FIELD BORING LOG
5-289
"».«h-
Nim« of Proj^t- S°PP Battery
Bftrinf N" MW"'2B Fif-MTVrhniri
Ground Eltv. ..... ^
P^gi. Nn 1 nf 2
^ n.t^ Time 1010 SD
1 juu i~Lj
^ftntn CR Water EJ*v.
SMupU
No.
^^••MB^^H
S*mpl«
Dtptb— F««t
From
To
D«pth Stratum
PMt
rram
2.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
35.0
40.0
45.0
To
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
35.0
40.0
45.0
60.0
VUaal ClftuttleitJon
MW-12B
Light brown/peach clay, very fine sand, som«
chips •
•Blawt Per 6*
1st
Clay, grey and red/brown increasing with depth.
i
get coarses sand and brown, red, and black rounded
gravel pebbles with depth, grey clay and red/
clay layers alternate
Red/brown clay -id medium fine sand slurry
Bottom of bit shows same as 5.0'- 10.0'
Note: Cuttings come up as a slurry of clay
mud, and fine sand. Descriptions based on c
chunks that wrap around and are brought up.
As above
As above, but no pebbles and more gravel
Pink/purple clay, fine sand less than above .
red/brown bands, coarse sand and qravel.
Cuttinas still come uo as slurry. Clav is
plastic and more cohesive
As above, but less sand and gravel, several
larae ( 1/2") rounded quartz pebbles
As above, but darker and qreyish, more fine
sand, less gravel and pebbles. Clay is plastic
but not as tiqht
As above, but no gravel or pebbles
Cuttings-clay and fine sand slurry-Same dark
purple clay
2nd
brownl
ay
1
/
grey
3rd
• tiumtu •! *>••• M 14* i* MUMf 4rt**M M iMkM (• «m* I in IWH-I*W
Remarkj' ^'c^ '°9S documented by Ecology and Environment
No. Sack* Drilling Mud:.
Type Drill Rig:
-E.-5
BY.
Field Technician
rt-oc.ea caper
lit rlllirtHIITU III
-------
Larry M.Jacobs & Associates, Inc.
Consulting Geotechnical Engineers
328 EAST GADSOEN STREET • PENSACOLA. FLORIDA 32501 • 904/434-0846
FIELD BORING LOG
Frtr-
Bonn* N« MW'22B
Ground Elev
Sopp Battery
Datum
Project No C
. .„._ . Wrathrr
pa£r N« 2
n.t. 11-19-85
Kr W.f, RJ.v
io-^or
«* 3
Time 0830 SO
SaapU
No.
-' h»PU
Dtp*— r««t
from
T*
Depth Stratum
FM(
Prom
0.0
4.0
9.0
14.0
19.0
24.0
29.0
36.0
39.0
42J5
43.0
44.0
49.0
54.0
To
4.0
9.0
14.0
19.0
24.0
29.0
36.0
39.0
42.5
43.0
44.0
49.0
54.0
59.0
VUoal CUi*ifiemtioB
MW-22B Continued
No cuttings
No cuttings
No cuttings
No cuttings
No cuttings
Peach colored sandy clay; sand is fine, some
silt. Very wet at 27.0'-29.0'
Very wet peach colored sandy clay with
some silt; as above
Cream colored wet sandy clay; sand is
coarse-medium, sub-angular. Sand Begins to
increase, may be more properly called a
clayey sand
Peach-cream colored wet sandy clay; clay
coarse-medium and sub-angular
As above, but back to lust cream
Back to oeach
Cream-oeoch clayey sand; sand is coarse to
medium, sub-anaular. Sand becoming finer
(more fine-medium than medium-coarse) wit)1
death
Cream-peach clayey sand/sandy clay.silty
clav with death. No cuttinas.
Went cream-peach silty sand, some clay.
sand very fine to fine
•Blowt P«r 6-
lit
2oa
II
1!
II
|
!l
II
II
II
f
II
II
II
Sri
Mr M Mm •( it* w MMin «r*f*M M
i* «n»« I in
Remarks:
logs documented by Ecology ond Environment
No. Saclu Drilling Mud:.
Type Drill Rig:
E-8
Field Technician
-------
Larry M. Jacobs & Associates, Inc. /
Consulting Ceotechnieal Engineert/
328 EAST GADS06N STREET • PENSACOLA. FLORIDA 32501 • 904/O4-0846
FIELD BORING LOG
85-289
Name of Project
Ground
Saop Banerv
Weather
No.
1325 SD
Datum
Rr. Water El«v
w
Sample
Dtptfc— Ft«t
Tram
1 To
Depth Stratum
FM*
Pram
0.0
5.0
10.0
14.0
19.0
24.0
29.0
34.0
39.0
Ta
5.0
10.0
14.0
19.0
It. 0
29.0
34.0
39.0
44.0
Viral ClMdf luttoa
MW-22B
Tan coarse sand and gravel, sand is medium
to coarse, tan to light brown; gravel predom
white rounded quartz
Fine-medium sandy clay; sand is tan to
red/brown, clay = light qrey
As above
Fine-medium sandy clay; some gravel (white,
grey, and red/borwn quartz at top), sand
finer and lower content with depth; clay bee
predominantly pinkish/brown with some light
arey and peach colors
Fine sandv clay; clov color as above-Bottom
of bit-fine sandv clav, clav is marbled combi
of light grev. pinkish/brown, peach and oran^
hrnwn
As above
Light qrey silty clay with some very
fine sand; clay = plastic-Bottom of bit same
Same as above-Few cuttinas clayey "soup" w
some silt and sand- Loss of circulation
No cuttinqs-swallows another tank of revert
Hole caves in bottom 5.0'-7.0'
Jim Dudley notes activity and discoloration
in annulus of MW-22A-8. Levine confirms bi
when another tank of revert is pumped in.
•Blow. Per 6*
Itt
nantl}
omes
2aa
nation!
e/red
ith
>f wot*
sr
ablingjl
ll
Sid
•( M**i if IM it utmmtr tnttn M IMOM I* <»»• I in «»IU-IM«
-------
Larry M.Jacobs & Associates, Inc.
Consulting Ceotechnical Engineers
328 EAST GAOSOEN STREET . PENSACOtA. FLORIDA 32501 » 904/434-0646
FIELD BORING LOG
Vnr-
Name of Pro
j«*- s°pp Battefy
Pr«j*r, No °--«
Wrather
Pag* Nn
7
«f
Boring M* MW-21C FJ..M Technician _
Ground Elev . Datar
» 11-7-85 Time 1155 SD
1530 FD
Gr. Water Elev
Staple
No.
StmpU
Depth— Fe«t
From
To
Depth Sfrmtum
FMt
Froa
0.0
2.0
6.0
7.5
9.0
To
2.0
6.0
7.5
9.0
22.0
Viral ClMittlcatira
MW-21C
Light brown fine medium clayey sand with
rust splotches slightly moist
Light grey fine medium quartz sandy clay
Brown tan fine medium clayey sand; moist
Light arey fine medium quartz sand clay
with very sparse small black cinder fraqment^
moist
Tan fine medium sandy clay with black
orqanic fraqments (coal like); wet
NOTE: Sand comes from Clark Sand Compan
in Pensacola, Florida. Grout consistency is
before (MW-6C)
Construction:
1. 2" PVC Triloc with seal
2. 10.0' 0.01" slot screen
3. 12.0' 14MO sand
4. 2.0' bentonite oellets (Geo-Pel)
5. 5.0' grout
^. 2.0* concrete with oad
•Blow. Per 0-
Ut
f
2aa
M
«r Urn «f It* Ik IU
M inckn M tnn I IK
,c. ,, , , XJUP-I ,^
Remarks: rield logs documented by ecology ond Environment
: Lorry M. Jacobs & Associates, Ir
Jim Buttle
No. Sacks Drilling Mud:.
Type Drill Rag:
E-10 BY.
f " '"
Helper: R. Newby
Method: 6" Hollow Stem
Field Technician
-------
Larry M. Jacobs & Associates, Inc.
Consulting Ceotechnical Engineer!
328 EAST GADSOEN STREET • PENSACOLA, FLORIDA 32501 • 904/434-0846
FIELD BORING LOG
85-289
_ . v- MW-22B
Bonny No. •««
Ground EI«v_,_
Sopp Battery
Datum
Weather
nit* 11-19-85
fip. Watar E1*V
^
Time 0830 SD
1107 FD
StapU
No.
Staple
Depth— Pert
From
To
Depth Sfrmtum
Fe«t
FTOB
59.0
To
63.0
VboaJ CUuifleaUen
MW-22B Continued
Same as above. Encounter something hard
at 61.0'-62.0'.
Jim Dudley gives me sample from bottom of
hole (he says)-qreyish clay with silt and fine
sand clay is plastic and moist
NOTE: 13:30 Pull augers bottom 20.0'-25.0'
covered with green clay, sometimes fluid,
sometimes more cohesive. Bottom of bit
shows aravel-Samples taken. Gordon
Dean aarees that well should be comoleted
in green elav and gravel because it shoyld
•Blow, Per a*
lit
nrnrliir* wnfr»r.
Construction
53.0'-2" PVC with Triloc seal and 10.0' of
0.0 1" slotted screen. Well comoleted at 62. (
with 3.0' stickup. 13.0' sand. 2.0' Bentoriit?
pHl«»t*- 4-5' grout, 2i5J_CCment. 2-0' be.Qtor
i1
lite
Construct '"" eqmpicted 16:40. Baifily got
5*tS.
2na
3id
»!•«• •( it* ik htmmtt
-------
Larry M. Jacobs & Associates, Inc.
Co n » uIt i n | Ceoiechnical Engin e e r s
328 EAST GADS06N STREET • PENSACOLA, FLORIDA 32501 • 904/43*-0646
FIELD BORING LOG
For:
Name of Project:.
Bering No MW-"C
Ground Elev
Sopp Battery
Project N
Weather
Page No.
85-239
1
«» 2
Technician
Dttt.
Time 1405 SD
Datum.
Gr. Water Eev.
1505 FU
MA
Su
Doptfc-
PTOK
ipio
— F«*t
To
Ifcpik^
rron
0.0
0.4
5.0
6.5
7.5
9.5
12.0
14.5
19.5
22.0
atfACttB
Mt
To
0.4
5.0
8.5
7.5
9.5
12.0
14.5
19.5
22.0
22.5
Viral CUuUtution
MW-23C
Organic rich, dark brown topsail
Dark grey, moist, silty fine sand w/some cla^
fairly cohesive
As above, but higher water content, still coh
but runnier
Dark grey fine silty sand intermixed with
red/brown clayey sond/sandv clay-not as mue
water as obove-Beain to pick up unusual aron
disinfectant? chlorine? Root seament 1' long
1/2" mqximum diameter
Medium grey, fairly dry silty fine sand with
some clay. Comes up hole as disaggregated
clumps ("popcorn")
— Medium grev/beige fin* siltv sand, moist and
runny, but 5s eoh^siv*. some clav
As 7 1/2-9 1/2, but more sand, fine-medium,
— arey/beige. Larger disaaar«gat«d clumps.
Light grey/beige sandy clay/clayey sand;
fine sand, ,sfj|| jom»
-------
Larry M.Jacobs & Associates, Inc.
Consulting Ceotech nic a I Engineers /
328 EAST GAOSOEN STREET • PENSACOLA. FLORIDA 32501 « 904/434-0846
FIELD BORING LOG
For--
Name
, «fp«j.,*. Sopp Battery
-------
Larry M.Jacobs & Associates, Inc.
Consulting Geotcchnical Engineers /
328 EAST GAOSOEN STREET • PENSACOLA. FLORIDA 32501 • 904/434-0646
FIELD BORING LOG
For:
No
Name of Project-—
Boring y» MW-6C
Groond Elev
Sopp Battery
Page No.
.Field Technician.
rut* 11-6-85 Time 1400 SD
1650 PD
_ Gr. Water Elev,
tempi*
No.
Ssapl*
D«ptb— FMt
From
To
Dtptb 8&»tnm
iw
rrea
0.0
3.5
6.0
10.0
13.0
To
3.5
6.0
10.0
13.0
22.0
VtanJ CUMifle*d0n
MW-6C
Brown to block (topsoil) fine-medium quartz
clayey sand, moist, vegetation (0-6")
Grey fine clay guartz sand, very moist
Light grey medium sandy clay, very wet
becoming gravelly at 9.0'
Very light grey to white slightly medium
sandy clay, very wet and sticky
Very light grey medium/coarse sandy cloy-
ciayey sand, less wet than proceeding intervc
Note: hit gravel (or Limestone fragments)^
NOTE: Completed at 1630: Will set final t\
of concrete with security cover in the morni
in order to let grout settle.
Note: PVC is Brainard-Kilman Triloc
Construction:
Note: Sandy clay ran back up in hollow sten
and couldn't get 2" PVC pipe down so pumpe
water down hollow stem to blow out clay.
1. Bottom of PVC at 21.0'
2. 10.0 feet screen
3. 12.0' sand (type 16/40)
4. 2.0' bentonite pellets
5. 5.0' grout
6. 2.0' concrete and pad
•Blow. Per 6*
1st
1,
1?,0
fo fee
ig
d
2na
3rd
• Miumr •< M*v> •< 1M l» lumMr «r»»n« U (BUM I* «n»« 1 I* «»l> ijii» u*i»ur
Sub: Larry M. Jacobs & Associates, Inc.
Remarks: Field logs documented by Ecology and EnvironmentDriller; Jim Dudley
No. Sacks Drilling Mud:.
Type Drill Rjg:
Helper: R. Newby
Method: Hollow Stem 6"
•E-14
Bv-
Field Technician
-------
Larry M, Jacobs & Associates, Inc. /
Consulting Geoteeh n i ea 1 Engineers /
328 EAST GAOSOEN STREET • PENSACOUA. FLORIDA 32501 • 904/434-0846
FIELD BORING LOG
For-
NKOIV of Project '•,.,,
.» MW-23C
TJ *w^ IWA fcJ^*
Ground Elev
Sapp Battery
Field Tcrhnirian --
Project N",
V'-nthtr
Pag- No 2
r., w.*« w«
85-ZoT
2
Time 1405 SO
OUO i-u
S^npl*
M«.
Sample
D«ptb— FMt
From
1 To
Dtpth Sfr»tua
FMt
From
To
VUml CUMlficadov
MW-23C
Construction:
1. 2" PVC withTriloc seal
2. 10.0' 0-0'" slotted screen
3. 6.0'-7.0' casing
4. WeU=16.0'-17.0' LSD
5. 14.0'- 15.0" sand and cave-in materials
6. 2.0' bentonite pellets
7. 2.0' concrete and pad
•Blow. Per «•
In
2aa
3rd
tl It* Ik
«»»*•• J* inckM M «tl»« I in «n»-i»ii»
logs documented by Ecology
Sub: Larry M. Jacobs & Associates, Inc.
Driller: Jim Dudley
M c L ppd,-Environment
No. Sacks Drfilma Mud:
Type Drill Rjg:.
Bx.
~E-13
Helpers: R. Maddox, J. Fountain
Method: Hollow Stem
Field Technician
•ecydec pjper
-------
LAYNE-COfTRAL COjgANY
FORMATION LOG
CONTRACT,
CITY
Sann Battery
CONTRACT NO. 1669-170
DATE 1-12-86
Alford
COUNTY
Jackson
STATE Florida
LOG AT 101!
Outside fence by R.R. track - East
TEST HOLE NO.
WELL NO. 21-A
ELEVATION N.A.
DATE BEGAN 11-18-85 DATE COMPLETED 11-19-85
SIZE SLUSH PIT none
ELECTRIC LOG none
SAMPLE
NO.
—
i
-
INCHES
MUD
WT.
MUD
FORMATION
Sandy red clay
Sand
Sandy clay
Sand and gravel
Pink lime rock
>
«
THICKNESS
EA. STRATA
20
22
21
22
50
TOTAL
DEPTH
• 20
42
63
85
135
Continued -—
E-16
Drilled by J. W. Johnson
.Check by B. J. Right
-------
rn
«
f-~*
en
a tolll*! FOE* I
• Initial FOER M«4ill«*tn« W«ll It ««i..,el
Mutt** »•« I
SluUlow *n4 O«P W.II |
^r (A) taurtmduu >itd D**p W*tl
(R«ca*
RECOMMENDED ADDITIONAL MONITORING WELL LOCATIONS
A- ofci:P
(', II Ti' I'l
-------
CONTRACT Sapp Battery
CITY
Alford
LAYNE-CENTRAL COMPANY
FORMATION LOG
CONTRACT NO. 1669-170
COUNTY Jackson
DATE 1-12-86
STATE Florida
LOCATION
Northwest corner of waste site
TEST HOLE NO.
WELL NO. 9"A
ELEVATION N-A-
DATE BEGAN 11-27-85
DATE COMPLETED
12-12-85
SIZE SLUSH PIT N°ne
ELECTRIC LOG none
SAMPLE
NO.
INCHES
MUD
-
W.
KCJD
FORMATION
Fill (W) battery cases •
Muck - swamp wood
Gray clay
Sand
Gray clay
Fine sand
Sand and gravel
t
*
Ccntinutd
THICKNESS
EA. STRATA
4
6
3
5
12
30
75
%
TOTAL
DEPTH
4
10
13
18
30
60
135
E-18
Drilled by
Checked bv
J. W. Johnson
B. J. Right
-------
LAYNE-CENTRAL COMPANY
FORMATION LOG
CONTRACT.
cm
Sapp Battery
Alford
CONTRACT N0._
COUNTY Jackson
1669-170
DATE 1-12-86
STATE Florida
LOCATION
Southwest corner of waste site near trailer
TEST HOLE NO.
VELL MO. 12~A
DATE BEGAN
12-3-85
COMPLETED 12-5~85
ELEVATION N.A.
SIZE SLUSH PIT
ELECTRIC LOG
none
SAMPLE
NO.
.
INCHES
MUD
-
V.T.
MUD
•
FORMATION
Sandy red clay
Gray sand
Gray clay
Sand and clay
Sand and gravel
Fine sand
*
%
THICKNESS
EA. STRATA
4
' 22
11
24
27
47
*
TOTAL
DEPTH
' 4
' 26
37
•• 61
88
135
Continued ...
E-17
Drilled by
Checked by
J. W. Johnson
B. J.
Right
•ecvciec caper
nlitu\ mill i M\in>iiiMi nt
-------
LAJNE-CECTRAL COMPANY
FORMATION LOG
3NTRACT
Sapp Baccery
Alford
CONTRACT N0._
COUNTY Jackson
1669-170
DATE 1-12-86
STATE Florida
3CATION
Southeast corner of vaste site
2ST HOLS NO.
WELL NO. 6"A ELEVATIOM N'A'
BEQA1I 11-20-85 DATE COMPLETED 11-26-85
SIZE SLUSH PIT none
ELECTRIC LOG
none
SAMPLE
•ro.
—
INCHES
MUD
-
V.T.
MUD
-
FORMATION
Sandv red clav
Gray sandy1 clay
Sand (W) clay"
Sand & gravel
Pink lime rock-
•»
THICKNESS
EA. STRATA
A
32
A3
16
40
*
TOTAL
DEPTH
' k
36
79
' 95
135
E-20
recycled ptpf'
Drilled by J, w. Johnson
Checked.bv B. J. Right
rruloCi *nd MvinMimrni «»*6"«-
-------
LATHE-CENTRAL COMPANY
FORMATION LOG
CONTRACT,
CITY
Sa?P Battery
Alford
CONTRACT N0._
COUNTY Jackson
1669-170
DAIS 1-12-86
STATE Florida
LOCATION
Northwest corner- of waste site
TEST HOLE NO.
WELL NO. 22A
ELEVATION N.A.
SIZE SLUSH PIT None
EATS BEGAN 11-12-85 DATE COMPLETED 11-13-83
ELECTRIC LOG
none
SAMPLE
NO.
•
INCHES
MUD
-
WT.
KUD
•
FORMATION
Red sandy clay
Grey sandy clav
Sand
Sand and gravel
Red clay
Pink lime rock
,'
•
THICKNESS
EA. STRATA
6 '
" 32
"l7
t
20
17
43
\
TOTAL
DEPTH
' 6
' 38
' 55
75
92
135
Continued —
E-19
Drilled by
Checked by
J. W. Johnson
B. J. Right
recycled paper
ri'i»l«»g\ itml rntirttnmrfti
-------
SAPP BATTERY SITE FS
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION SYSTEMl
I.D. Prefix Description
FSA 10-foot soil borings, west bank of west swamp
FSB 10-foot soil borings, along southern berm
FSC 10-foot soil boring, through facility foundation
FSE 5-foot soil borings, east bank of west swamp
FSG 10-foot soil boring, grid north of facility
FSL 15-foot soil boring, northwest landfill
FSS Surface soil sample location
FMH 5-foot sediment boring, swamps
FMK 10-foot boring, swamps
FMT 2.5-foot boring, swamps
FGW Residential Well samples, November 1985
HGW Residential Well samples, March 1986
FNW New Well samples, wells installed by E i E
FEW Existing Well samples, wells installed previously
FPW Facility Wells
FSF Fixation Study Samples
D— Duplicate samples
GWR Field Equipment Rinsate - well sampling
FSR Field Equipment Rinsate - soil/sediment sampling
SBB Trip Bottle Blank
^•Excludes priority pollutant sample analyses
(Summary Report Appendix A)
F-2
-------
APPENDIX F
SAPP BATTERY SITE SUMMARY REPORT
DATA CATALOG
F-l
recycled paper «•«>!<>«» anil rmimnnirni
-------
ecology and environment, inc.
SUITE 205.2574 SEAGATE DRIVE, TALLAHASSEE FLORIDA 32301 TEL 904877 1978
International Specialists in the Environment
MEMORANDUM
TO: Brent Hartsfield, FOER
FROM: J. Paul Oxer. PE
DATE: December 16. 1985
SUBJ: SAPP BATTERY FEASIBILITY STUDY: RESIDENTIAL WELL
SAMPLING RESULTS
Attached are the results of the analytical work for samples taken
Oct( ber 28 for the listed residential wells. Sample identities are
11 -> ed below.
Station Location
FGW-01 Carl Dilmore Residence
FGW-02 Joseph Duncan Residence
FGW-03 James Burdeshaw Residence
rGW-04 Salem Baptist Church
FGW-05 Mr. Jensemus Residence
FGW-07 J. W. Crooms Residence
FGW-08 L. R. Barnes Residence
FGW-09 Richard Bush Residence
DGW-09 Richard Bush Residence (Duplicate)
FGW-10 . Vester Davis Residence
FGW-11 Lester Ellerbee Residence
FGW-12 Lester Ellerbee Tab. Well
DGW-12 Lester Ellerbee Tab. Well (Duplicate)
FGW-13 Roscoe Kent Residence
FGW-14 William Stoneberger Residence
FGW-15 Rufus Mayo Residence
FGW-17 Harold Williams Residence
FGW-18 Carolyn Skipper Residence
FGW-19 Jackie Farren Residence
F-4
"K cled pii
-------
RESIDENTIAL WELL
SAMPLE ANALYSES DATA
F-3
recycled paper rruUtgt and <-min>nmrni
-------
MEMORANDUM
TO: Rick Rudy
FRO1'!: Gary Hahn
DATE: December 11, 1985
SUBJECT: Sapp Battery Report; Job U-2565
CC: Lab File, QA/QC File
Attached is the laboratory report of the analysis conducted on tweni:,'-
nine samples received at the Analytical Services Center on November '>,
1985. Analysis was performed according to the procedures set fortf ir
U.S. EPA Contract Laboratory Program, Inorganic Statement of Work,
1984.
All samples, on which this report is based, will be retained by E&E
for a period of 30 days from the date of this report, unless otherwi ?t-
instructed by the client. If additional storage of samples is
recjested by the client, a storage fee of Sl.OO/sample container pe-
month will be charged for each sample, with such charges accruing
until destruction of the samples is authorized by the client.
GH/cp
enclosure
F-6
-------
MEMORANDUM
Brent Hartsfield
Dorsmber 16. 1985
Pf.qe Two
Station
FGW-20
FGW-21
FGW-22
FGW-26
FGW-27
FGW-28
DGW-28
FGW-29
FGW-30
GWBB-01
Location
Delores Brown Residence
Sandra Rowe Residence
Jill Cosper Residence
James Braxton Residence
Amos Morris Residence
Charles Taylor Residence
Charles Taylor Residence (Duplicate)
Alford Fire Department
Rufus Mayo Residence
Trip Bottle Blank
JPO/cm
F-5
recycled paper
und rmintnmrm
-------
ecology and environment, inc.
p*C«Mt* m lh« Environment
LABORATORY REPORT
FOR
Sapp Battery
RE: FM-2140
Sampled By: E & E, Inc.
Delivered By: Federal Express
Job No.: U-2565
Sample Date: 11/2,4/85
Date Received: 11/5/85
Sample Type: Water Grab
E & E Lab Number 85- 7763 7764 7765 7766 7767 7768 7'69 Blank
Customer Numb-r FGW-09 OGW-09 FGW-10 FGW-11 FGW-12 DGW-12 Fa*-13
results In mg/L
Al urninum
Antimony
Arsenic
Cadmium
Lead
Manganese
Nickel
Selenium
<0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 -0.2 <0.2
<0.06 <0.06 <0.06 <0.06 <0.06 <0.06 ") .f6 <0.06
<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.!H35 <0.005
<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 < .001 <0.001
0.012 0.017 0.012 <0.005 0.012 0.013
-------
ecology and environment, inc.
lm«m»nor* Sp«ciaMn in Ih. Environment
LABORATORY REPORT
FOR
Sapp Battery
Job No.: U-2565 RE: FM-2140
Sample Date: 11/2,4/85 Sampled By: E & E, Inc.
Date Received: 11/5/85 Delivered By: Federal Exp> >ss
Sample Type: Water Grab
E i E Lab Number 85- 7756 Blank 7757 7758 7759 7760 7761 77
Custome- Number FGW-01 FRW-D? FGW-03 FGW-04 FGW-O'j FGW-07 FGW
results in mg/L
Al urn in tin
Antimony
Arsenic
Cadmium
Lead
Manganese
Nickel
Selenn:n
<0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
<0.06 <0.06 <0.06 <0.06 <0.06 <0.06 <0.06
<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005
<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
-------
-|jn ecology and environment, inc.
International Scwctafcsts m the Environment
LABORATORY REPORT
FOR
Sapp Battery
Job No.: U-2565 RE: FM-2140
Sample D*te: 11/2,4/85 Sampled By: E i E, Inc.
Date Received: 11/5/85 Delivered By: Federal Express
Sample Type: Water Grab
E i E Lab Number 85- 7777 7778 7779 7780 7781 7782 7'83 7784
Customer Number FGW-22 FGW-26 FGW-27 FGW-28 DGW-28 FGW-29 FG^-30 GWBB-01
results in mg/L
Al jninum
Antimony
Arsenic
C adm i urn
Lead
Manganese
Nickel
Selenium
<0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 0.248 <0.2
<0.06 <0.06 <0.06 <0.06 <0.06 <0.06
<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005
-------
ecology and environment, inc.
Innmmorw SMCWttU « in. Enwonnwnt
LABORATORY REPORT
FOR
Sapp Battery
Job No.: U-2565 RE: FM-2140
Sample- Date: 11/2,4/85 Sampled By: E & E, Inc.
Date Received: 11/5/85 Delivered By: Federal Expres1
Sample Type: Water Grab
E & E Lab Number 85- 7770 7771 7772 7773 7774 777b 777b
Customer Number FGW-14 FGW-15 FGW-17 FGW-18 FGW-19 FGW-20 Fuw-21
results in mg/L
Aluminum <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 -0.2
Antimony <0.06 <0.06 <0.06 <0.06 <0.06 <0.06 <0.06
Arsenic <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005
-------
U-2565
QUALITY CONTROL FOR ACCURACY: PERCENT RECOVERY
FOR SPIKED WATER SAMPLES
Element
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Cadmium
Lead
Manganese
Nickel
Selenium
E & E
Laboratory
No. 85-
7759
7776
7759
7776
7759
7776
7759
7776
7776
7759
7776
7759
7776
7759
7776
Original
Value
<200
<200
<60
<60
<5
<5
<1
<1
1.8
35
<15
<20
31
<5
<5
Amount
Added
(ug/L)
2000
2000
500
500
20
20
5
5
20
200
200
400
400
10
10
Amount
Determined
1582
2210
578
503
16.0
23.5
4.78
5.57
38.5
186
215
312
428
6.7
11.4
Percent
Recovery
79.1
110
116
101
80.0
118
95.6
111
186
75.5
108
78.0
99.2
67.0
114
F-12
-------
U-2565
QUALITY CONTROL FOR PRECISION
RESULTS OF ANALYSIS Of RF.PUCATE
ANALYSES OF WATER SAMPLES
Element
Ant imony
Aluminum
Arsenic
Cadmium
Lead
Manganese
Nickel
Selenium
E 4 E
Laboratory
No. 85-
7759
7776
7759
7776
7759
7776
7759
7776
7759
7776
7759
7776
7759
7776
7759
7776
Original
Analysis
<0.06
<0.06
<0.2
<0.2
<0.005
<0.005
<0.001
<0.001
<0.005
0.010
0.035
<0.015
<0.02
<0.02
<0.005
<0.005
Replicate
Analysis
<0.06
CO. 06
<0.2
<0.2
<0.005
<0.005
C0.001
<0.001
0.024
<0.005
0.035
<0.015
<0.02
0.031
<0.005
<0.005
Relative
Percent
Difference
RPO
~
..
—
—
—
0.0
—
--
F-ll
recycled paper
tT<>l<*K* timl rminmmrni
-------
ecology uiid environment, inc.
SUHE 205. 2574 SEACiAlE UI1IVE, I AUAIIAV.I f. ri OIIIDA 37.101, TFL 90-1 R77 19'R
International Sp«CiAti919 in th« Environment
May 14. 1986
Mr. Brent llartsfield
Bureau of Operations
Florida Department of Environmental
Regulation
2600 Blair Stone Road
Tallahassee. FL 32301
RE: SAPP BATTERY FEASIBILITY STUDY: 2ND ROUND OF RESIDENTIAL
WELL SAMPLING RESULTS
Dear Brent:
Attached are the results and respective QA/QC data of tde analytic^' work
for residential well samples taken March 12-13. 1986. Sample idenl '..ies
and a summary of the detected metal species are also attached.
In comparison to the earlier lead data, these results follow the s^•>'
general trend as specified in the draft Sapp field report, where t>
highest lead concentrations are showing up southeast of the site.
Furthermore, the Lester Ellerbee. Carl Dilmore. and James Burdesha^1
residence wells have elevated lead levels on the order of 0.010 to '.020
ppm in comparison to the last sampling round.
When E i E finalizes the draft Sapp Summary Report, these data will hi?
incorporated in the residential well section.
Please call if you have any questions HI reference to this work.
Yours truly,
ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT, INC.
Pi- hard J. Rudy
l!y Irogeologist
JR/liif
cc: J. Paul Oxer
F-14
-------
U-2565
QUALITY CONTROL FOR ACCURACY:
PERCENT DIFFERENCE—EPA QUALITY ASSURANCE MATERIALS
Element
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Cadmium
Lead
Manganese
Nickel
Selenium
Concentrat ions
Known
729
101.5
101.5
26.7
26.7
3.5
3.3
42.7
348
207
50.2
50.2
in uq/L
Determined
761
102.7
100.7
29.1
28.5
3.44
3.16
41.6
353
215
37.4
37.9
Percent
Difference
4.4
1.2
0.8
8.9
6.7
4.2
4.2
2.6
1.4
3.9
25.5
24.5
Note: These results are within the 95% confidence interval for these
parameters.
F-13
recycled paper
-------
MEMORANDUM
TO: Rick Rudy
FROM: Gary Hahn J/-( Itt'->
DATE: April 21, 1986
SUBJECT: Sapp Battery Report; Job U-3048
CC: Lab File, QA/QC File
Attached is the laboratory report of the analysis conducted on twentj -
nine samples received at the Analytical Services Center on March 17,
1986. Analysis was performed according to the procedures set forth in
U.S. EPA Contract Laboratory Program, Inorganic Statement of Work,
1984.
All samples, on which this report is based, will be retained by E & E
for a period of 30 days from the date of this report, unless otherw;e
instructed by the client. If additional storage of samples Is
requested by the client, a storage fee of Sl.OO/sample container pti
month will be charged for each sample, with such charges accruing
until destruction of the samples is authorized by the client.
GH/cp
enclosure
F-16
-------
',AIT HAI III'/ M II
'.IIMIIAK i (II III III I I |i [II I /\| M'l 1. I I. j
S.imple Identity | ,,,,,( M.IMCI.IIIPSP Aluminum
HGW-01 Carl Dilmore Residence 0.071
IIGW-02 Joseph Duncan Residence
HfiW-Ol ,1,-lMiPS RtirdnMinw Ho-. i <|rm< o (l.lllfi
IIGW-04 Salem Baptist Churdt O.IMfl <0.
..Kim i inn
IU5W-05 Jansenius Residence
HGW-07 George Grooms Resiflencr
IIGW-08 James Barnes Residence 0.090
IIGW-09 Richard Bush Resid(?nro (I. HI? 0.261
HGW-10 Vester Davis Residence ' O.OOG
MGW-11 Lester Ellerbee labernacle 0.009
HGW-12 Lester Ellerbee Residpnce 0.071 0.1Z5 0.30?
O.nP. IU 0. 12UU 0.200U
HGW-I3 Roscoe Kent Residence 0.205 O.OO/
MGW-l't Bill Stoii"liiirgr>r KP-; nlnurp
IIGW-1R Rufus Mayo Residence O.fW/
IIGW-1/ Harold Williams Residence U.UUb
IIGW-18 Carolyn Skipper Residence
HGW-19
IIGW-20
IIGW-21
IIGW-22
IIGW-26
MGW-27
IIGW-28
IIGW-29
IIGW-30
IIGW-jl
Jackie Farren Residence
Ue lores Brown Residence
Sandra Rowes Residence
William Casper Residence
James Braxter Residence
Amos Morris Residence
Charles Taylor Residence
A 1 ford Fire Department
Teresa Mayo Residence
Emmet Roark Residence
O.UD6
O.Wi
0.01)8
n.oo.s
O.OIJ/
(fliit Samp
led 2nd Round)
<0.200
0.219D
NOIE: Blank spares repcesent non-doLo. t«?(| insults and all values are parts
per mi 11 ion (ppm).
F-15
recycled paper
-------
ecology and environment, inc.
fratiix* SMCI*MTS m (ft« En
LABORATORY REPORT
Job No.:
Sample Date:
Date Received:
Sample Type:
E X. E Lab Number 86-
Customer Number
Al uminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Cadmium
Lead
Manganese
Nickel
Selenium
U-3048
3/12-13/86
3/17/86
Water
1808
HGW
07
<0.2
<0.06
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.015
<0.04
<0.005
FOR
Sapp Battery
RE: FM-2140
Sampled By: E & E, Inc.
Delivered By: Federal Express
1809 1810 1811 Prep Prep 312
Blank Blank
HGW HGW HGW 'GW
08 09 10 380 381 11
Results in mg/L
<0.2 0.261 <0.2 <0.2 —
1
F-18
tilting* MM*I I IH ttofllllt <
0331 14
-------
ecology and environment, inc.
LABORATORY REPORT
FOR
Sapp Battery
Job No.: U-3048
Sample Date: 3/12-13/96
Date Received: 3/17/86
Samp'ie Type: Water
E Lab Number 86- 1302
RE: FM-2140
Sampled By: E & E, Inc.
Delivered By: Federal F.xpre'.;
1803
1804
1805
1306
.307
Customer Number
Al iminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Cadmium
Lead
Manganese
Nickel
Selenium
HGW
01
<0.2
<0.06
<0.005
<0.005
0.021
<0.015
<0.04
<0.005
HGW
02
Resul
<0.2
<0.06
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.015
<0.04
<0.ons
HGW
03
ts in mg/L
<0.2
<0.06
<0.005
<0.005
0.016
<0.015
<0.04
<0.005
HGW
04
<0.2
<0.06
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
0.048
<0.04
<0.005
DHGW
04
0.215
<0.06
< 0.005
<0.005
<0.005
0.052
<0.04
<0.005
\'\V
05
.0,2
n.06
•0.005
'0.005
i1. 005
'0.015
0.04
•'1.005
Analytical References:
U.S. EPA Contract Laboratory Progran, Inorganic Statement of Work, ..T<4.
Supervising Analyst V '\ j/i^) / ft',
Date:
F-17
03- > 14
recycled paper
-------
ecology and environment, inc.
LABORATORY REPORT
FOR
Sapp Battery
Job No.: U-3048
Sample Date: 3/12-13/86
Date Received: 3/17/86
Sample Type: Water
E i E Lab Number 86- 1820
RE: FM-2140
Sampled By: E i E, Inc.
Delivered By: Federal Express
1821
1822
1823
1824
16 <'.
Customer Number
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Cadmium
Lead
Manganese
Nickel
Selenium
HGW
19
<0.2
<0.06
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.015
<0.04
<0.005
HGW HGW HGW
20 21 22
Results in mg/L
-------
ecology and environment, inc.
Imtmttantl Sc*c>lnu in ih
LABORATORY REPORT
FOR
Sapp Battery
Job No.: U-3048
Sample Date: 3/12-13/86
Date Received: 3/17/86
Sample Type: Uater
RE: FM-2140
Sampled By: E & E, Inc.
Delivered By: Federal Expresi
E & E Lab Number 86-
Customer Number
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Cadmium
Lead
Manganese
Nickel
Selenium
1814
DHGW
12
0.268
<0.06
<0.005
<0.005
0.021
0.120
<0.04
<0.005
1815
HGW
13
0.205
<0.06
<0.005
0.007
<0.005
<0.015
<0.04
<0.005
1816
HGW
14
Results in
<0.2
<0.06
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.015
<0.04
<0.005
1817
HGW
15
mg/L
<0.2
<0.06
<0.005
<0.005
0.007
<0.015
<0.04
<0.005
1818
HGW
17
<0.2
<0.06
<0.005
<0.005
0.005
<0.015
<0.04
<0.005
18! )
HGW
<0 ?
<0 . '6
0.005
<'M'05
<0.>05
<0.015
<(.' . J4
n%iriMiiiit>ni
-------
U-3048
QUALITY CONTROL FOR PRECISION
RESULTS OF ANALYSIS OF REPLICATE
ANALYSES OF WATER SAMPLES
Element
Uuninun
Antimony
Arsenic
Codniint
Lead
Manganese
Nickel
Seleniun
E 4 E
Laboratory
No. 86-
1811
1829
1811
1829
1811
1829
1811
1829
1811
1829
1811
1829
1811
1829
1811
1829
Original
Analysis
<0.2
0.219
<0.05
<0.06
<0.005
<0.00^
<0.005
-------
ecology and environment, inc.
LABORATORY REPORT
FOR
Sapp Battery
Job No.: U-3048
Sample Date: 3/12-13/86
Date Received: 3/17/86
Sample Type: Water
RE: FM-2140
Sampled By: E & E, Inc.
Delivered By: Federal Express
E & E Lab Number 86-
Customer Number
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Cadmium
Lead
Manganese
Nickel
Selenium
1826
HGW
28
<0.2
<0.06
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.015
<0.04
<0.005
1827
HGW
30
<0.2
<0.06
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.015
<0.04
<0.005
1828
HGW
31
Results
<0.2
<0.06
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.015
<0.04
<0.005
1829
DHGW
31
in mg/L
0.219
<0.06
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.015
<0.04
<0.005
1830
HGW
8B
<0.2
<0.06
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.015
<0.04
<0.005
Prep
Blank
382
<0.2
<0.06
—
<0.005
—
<0.015
<0.04
__
Prep
Blank
383
--
--
<0.005
--
<0.005
--
--
<0.005
Analytical References:
U.S. ZPA Contract Laboratory Program, Inorganic Statement of Work, 1984.
Supervising Analyst
Date: ' '?".'./
,./"•; •l*l\J(:r
'• ;yc Irt p»p«r
F-21
recycled paper
inn)
-------
U-3048
QUALITY CONTROL FOR ACCURACY:
PERCENT DIFFERENCE—EPA QUALITY ASSURANCE MATERIALS
Element
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Cadmium
Lead
Manganese
Nickel
Selenium
Concentrations
Known
729
729
101.5
101.5
26.7
26.7
39.0
39.0
42.7
348
348
207
207
10.9
10.9
in uq/L
Determined
709
841
B3.0
93.0
29.1
31.2
39.8
39.9
42.8
368
357
218
214
11.6
11.1
Percent
Difference
2.7
15.3*
18.2
8.4
9.0
16.8
2.0
2.3
0.2
5.7
2.4
5.3
3.4
6.4
1.8
Note: These results are within the 95S confidence interval for these
parameters.
F-24
-------
U-3048
QUALITY CONTROL FOR ACCURACY: PERCENT RECOVERY
FOR SPIKED WATER SAMPLES
Element
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Cadmium
Lead
Manganese
Nickel
Selenium
E 4 E
Laboratory
No. 86-
1811
1829
1811
1829
1811
1829
1811
1829
181t
1829
1811
1829
1811
1829
1811
1829
Original
Value
<200
219
<60
<60
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
6.0
<5.0
05
<15
<40
<40
<5.0
<5.0
Amount
Added
(ug/L)
2000
2000
500
500
20
20
50
50
20
20
200
200
400
400
10
10
Amount
Determined
1720
1678
481
468
18.7
20.1
59.8
50.5
28. J
18.7
208
203
405
405
10.6
10.4
"ercent
Recovery
86.0
7J.O
96.2
93.6
93.5
100
120
101
112
93.5
104
102
101
101
106
104
F-23
recycled paper
-------
r ecology and environment, inc.
lm»rn«tMXx«l S
-------
MONITORING WELL
SAMPLE DATA
F-25
recycled pflpef ft-nlng* i«n«l
-------
U-2681
QUALITY CONTROL FOR ACCURACY: PERCENT RECOVERY
FOR SPIKED WATER SAMPLES
clement
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Cadmium
le«d
Manganese
Selenium
E & E
Laboratory
No. 85-
8769
8764
8769
8762
8769
8769
8769
Original
Value
<200
<0.06
<5
<1
7.7
<15
<10
Amount
Added
(ug/l)
2000
120
25
2.5
25
200
25
Amount
Determined
2352
119.7
26.7
7.2
29.1
236
26.4
-srcent
•ecovery
118
99.8
107
128
86
118
106
F-28
-------
ecology and environment, inc.
Imtrninond SMcimtt in tr* Enviroomtm
LABORATORY REPORT
FOR
Sapp Battery
Job No.: U-2681
Sample Date: 11/19-26/85
Date Received: 12/2/85
Sample Type: Water Grabs
E & E Lab Number 85- 8765 8766
Customer Number FEW-20C FNW-06C
Al urn in in
Antimony
Arsenic
Cadmium
Lead
Manganese
Seleniun
11.8 52.8
<0.06 <0.06
<0.005 <0.005
0.006 <0.001
0.043 0.046
0.119 <0.015
<0.010 <0.010
RE: FM-2130
Sampled By: E & E, Inc.
Delivered By: Federal Expn> -,
8767 8768 8769 8770
FNW-21C GWR-02 GWR-03 GW88-Cr
all results in mg/L
56.5 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
<0.06 <0.06 <0.06 <0.06
<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.00t
0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.00.
0.022 0.028 0.008 <0.0l:!«
0.023 <0.015 <0.015
-------
U-2681
QUALITY CONTROL FOR ACCURACY:
PERCENT DIFFERENCE—EPA QUALITY ASSURANCE MATERIALS
Element
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Cadmium
lead
Manganese
Selenium
Concentrations
Known
729
101.5
26.7
3. JO
42.7
348
10.9
in ug/L
Determined
709
107.6
26.4
3.43
44.7
346
11.1
Percent
Difference
2.7
6.0
1.1
3.9
4.7
0.6
1.8
Note: These results are within the 955 confidence interval for these
parameters.
F-30
-------
U-2681
QUALITY CONTROL FOR PRECISION
RESULTS OF ANALYSIS OF REPLICATE
ANALYSES OF WATER SAMPLES
Compound
Aluminum
Ant imony
Arsenic
Caomiu.
Lead
Manganese
Selenium
E & E
Laboratory
No. 85-
8769
8769
8769
8769
8769
8769
8769
Original
Analysis
<200
<0.06
<5
0
7.7
<15
<10
Replicate
Analysis
<200
-------
Njn ecology and environment, inc.
*l Sp*ct*Mtl
-------
MEMORANDUM
TO: Rick Rudy
FROM: Gary Hahn
DATE: January 20, 1986
SUBJECT: Amended Sapp Battery Report, Job No. U-2700
Attached is the amended laboratory report of the analysis conducted cr
thirteen samples received at the Analytical Services Center on
December 5, 1985. Please replace the incorrect page with the amende-]
one. We apologize for any inconvenience th's "!ay have caused.
Analysis was performed according to the procedures set forth in U.S.
EPA Contract Laboratory Program, Inorganic Statement of Work 1984.
All samples, on which this report is based, will be retained by E&E
for •, period of 30 days from the date of the original report, unless
otherwise instructed by the client. If additional storage of sample:
is requested by the client, a storage fee of Sl.OO/sanple container
per month will be charged for each sample, with such charges accruing
until destruction of the samples is authorized by the client.
GH/cp
enclosure
F-31
reCydCKJ P8p6f wulog* ami rn\ir»mni»'iii
-------
U-Z700
QUALITY CONTROL FOR ACCURACY:
PERCENT DIFFERENCE—EPA QUALITY ASSURANCE MATERIALS
Element
Concentrations in uq/L
Known Determined
Percent
Difference
AliMinum
Antimony
Arsenic
Cadiiu.
Lead
Manganese
Seleniui
729
101.5
26.7
39.0
42.7
42.7
348
10.9
744
96.1
28.4
45.7
43.3
40.9
352
o,2
2.0
5.3
6.4
17
1.4
4.2
1.1
16
F-34
-------
U-Z700
QUALITY CONTROL FOR PRECISION
RESULTS OF ANALYSIS OF REPLICATE
ANALYSES OF WATER SAMPLES
Element
Aluminum
Ant iraony
Arsenic
Cadmium
Lead
Manganese
Selenium
E 4 E
Laboratory
No. 85-
8845
8845
8845
8845
8845
8845
8845
Original
Analysis
1.73
<0.6
<0.005
<0.005
0.368
0.030
<0.005
Replicate
Analysis
1.88
<0.6
<0.005
<0.005
0.357
0.028
<0.005
Relative
Percent
Difference
RPO
8.)
—
—
—
3.0
6.9
~
F-33
recycled paper
-------
'Ill)
ecology and environment, inc.
InMriwftonif SetcwMtl m tnt Env»onm«m
LABORATORY REPORT
FOR
Sapp Battery
Job No.: U-2723 RE: FM-2130
Sample Date: 12/4-6/85 Sampled By: E & E, Inc.
Date Received: 12/7/85 Delivered By: Federal Expn ss
Sample Type: Water Composite
E & E Lab Number 85- 8939 8940 8941 8942 8943 8941
Customer Number FEW-16C FNW-06A FNW-23C DNW-23C FPW-01 FPW-C;
results in mg/L
Aluminun 285 1.04 3.53 7.76 0.809 1.12
Antimony <0.06 <0.06 <0.06 <0.06 <0.06 <0.06
Arsenic <0.05 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 0.018 <0.00.
Cadmium 0.076 <0.005 0.007 <0.005 <0.005 0.026
Lead 0.286 0.051 0.007 <0.005 1.83 1.50
Manganese 6.94 0.113 <0.015 0.033 2.46 0.17J
Seleniun <0.05 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 0.008 <0.0' f
Analytical References:
U.S EPA Contract Laboratory Program, Inorganic Statement of Work, 1'34.
Supervising Analyst S/^<1 j-jfl^/") / , •
r\z ^~~^
Date: l\f) ji/tA**, ^) /.
F-36 i .vi.i..r, i,
0 1«
-------
ecology and environment, inc.
••rninonM SMcuian in th« Enwonnwit
LABORATORY REPORT
FOR
Sapp Battery
Job No.: U-2723
Sample Date: 12/4-6/85
Date Received: 12/7/85
Samp^ Type: Water Composite
E & E Lzb Number 85- 8933 8934
Customer Number FEW-06B FEW-07B
AT uminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Cadmium
Lead
Manganese
Seleniup
2.21 280
<0.06 <0.06
<0.005 <0.005
<0.005 0.032
0.015 0.509
0.025 17.4
<0.05 <0.05
RE: FM-2130
Sampled By: E & E, Inc.
Delivered By: Federal Express
8935 8936 8937 893l~ Prep
FEW-08B FEW-13A FEW-13B FEW-i V Blank
results in mg/L
10.4 2.58 1.38 1.59 <0.2
<0.06 <0.06 <0.06 <0.06 <0.06
<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 0.009 <0.005
<0.005 0.011 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005
0.761 0.168 0.149 0.061 <0.005
0.060 0.876 0.184 0.232 <0.015
<0.005 <0.005 <0.05
-------
U-2723
QUALITY CONTROL FOR ACCURACY:
PERCENT DIFFERENCE—EPA QUALITY ASSURANCE MATERIALS
Element
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Cadmium
Lead
Manganese
Selenium
Concentrationa
Known
729
101.5
26.7
39.0
42.7
348
10.9
in uq/L
Determined
816
104.1
28.4
42.5
42.0
372
9.50
Percent
Difference
11.9
2.6
6.4
9.0
1.6
6.9
12.8
Note: These results are within the 95S confidence interval for these
parameters.
F-38
-------
U-272J
QUALITY CONTROL FOR PRECISION
RESULTS OF ANALYSIS OF REPLICATE
ANALYSES OF WATER SAMPLES
Compound
E & E
Laboratory
No. 85-
Original
Analysis
Replicate
Analysis
Relative
Percent
Difference
RPO
Manganese
Aluminum
Arsenic
Saleniun
Ant imony
Lead
Cadmium
8944
8944
8944
8944
8944
8944
8944
0.173
1.12
<0.005
<0.005
<0.06
1.50
<0.005
0.155
1.08
<0.005
<0.005
<0.06
1.44
<0.005
11.0
3.6
4.1
F-37
recycled paper
ami rmin»nm*'nt
-------
ecology and environ men I, inc.
Inttrrwtion* SMCUMU « IK* Environment
Job No.:
Sample Date:
Date Received:
Sample Type:
E i E Lab Number 85-
Customer Number
LABORATORY REPORT
FOR
SAPP BATTERY
U-2737
12/6-10/85
12/11/85
Water Grab
9013 9014*
HE: FM-2130
Sampled By: E & E, Inc.
Delivered By: Federal Express
9015
9016
9017
9018
9i'19
Prep
FEW-03B FNW-12A FNW-21A FNW-21B FNW-22A DNW-22A POT-OS Blank
Results in mg/L
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Cadmium
Lead
Manganese
Selenium
58.4
<0.06
<0.005
0.021
4.28
0.493
<0.5
105 7.72
<0.06
-------
MEMORANDUM
TO: Rick Rudy
FROM: Gary Hahn/d^
DATF: January 6, 1986
SUBJECT: Sapp Battery Report; Job U-2737
cc: Lab file, QA/QC file
Attached is the laboratory report of the analysis conducted on seven
simples received at the Analytical Services Center on December 11,
1985. Analysis was performed according to the procedures set fortu ,n
U.5. EPA Contract Laboratory, Inorganic Statement of Work, 1984.
All samples, on which this report is based, will be retained by E I'< ''
for a period of 30 days from the date of this report, unless otherv'.e
instructed by the client. If additional storage of samples is
requested by the client, a storage fee of Sl.OO/sample container pes
month will be charged for each sample, with such charges accruing
until destruction of the samples is authorized by the client.
F-39
recycled paper II-<>|IIK> mill rmininmrni
-------
U-2737
QUALITY CONTROL FOR ACCURACY:
PERCENT DIFFERENCE—EPA QUALITY ASSURANCE MATERIALS
Element
Aluninum
Antimony
Arsenic
Cadiiuo
Lead
Manganese
Selenium
Concentrations
Known
729
101.5
26.7
3.3
42.7
348
10.9
in uqA
Determined
713
101.0
27.8
3.43
39.2
353
9.7
Percent
Difference
2.2
0.5
4.1
3.9
8.2
1.4
11.0
Notei These results are within the 958 confidence interval for these
parameters.
F-42
-------
QUALITY CONTROL FOR PRECISION
RESULTS OF ANALYSIS OF REPLICATE
ANALYSES OF MATER SAMPLES
U-2737
Compound
E 4 E
Laboratory
No. SS-
Original
Analysis
Replicate
Analysis
Relative
Percent
Difference
RPD
Antimony
Arsenic
Cadmium
Lead
Selenium
9013
9013
9013
9013
9013
<0.06
C0.005
0.021
4.28
<0.5
<0.06
<0.005
0.022
6.38
<0.5
4.6
39.3
F-41
recycled paper
l fmirmimrnt
-------
MEMORANDUM
TO. Rick Rudy
F,*OM: Gary Hah
DATE: January 17, 1986
SUBJECT: Sapp Battery Report; Job No. U-2779
CC: Lab File, QA/QC File
Attached is the laboratory report of the analysis conducted on one
sample received at the Analytical Services Center on December 13,
1985. Analysis was performed according to U.S. EPA Contract
Laboratory Program, Inorganic Statement of Work 1984. The submitte^
sample was filtered prior to analysis per your instructions.
.Ml samples, on which this report is based, will be retained by E&F
fo a period of 30 days from the date of this report, unless other,v\ e
•r. -.tructed by the client. If additional storage of samples is
isquested by the client, a storage fee of Sl.OO/sample container p^r
month will be charged for each sample, with such charges accruing
until destruction of the samples is authorized by the client.
GH/cp
enclosure
F-44
-------
.-2737
QUALITY CONTROL FOR ACCURACY: PERCENT RECOVERY
FOR SPIKED HATER SAMPLES
Element
E & E
Laboratory
No. 85-
Original
Value
Amount
Added
(ug/L)
Amount
Determined
i'rrcent
Antimony
Arsenic
Cadmium
Lead
Selenium
9015
9015
9018
9015
9017
<60
<5
1.1
29.2
<5
120
25
2.5
25
25
110
29.J
3.59
54.1
23.2
91.7
117
99.6
100
"2.8
F-43
recycled paper
CV»|I>K> mill rminiiimriii
-------
U-2779
QUALITY CONTROL FOR ACCURACY!
PERCENT DIFFERENCE—E"» QUALITY ASSMRANTF MTERIALS
Element
Aluninum
Arsenic
Manganese
Selenium
Concentrations
Known
729
26.7
348
10.9
in uq/L
Determined
749
28.8
330
10.5
Percent
Difference
2.7
7.9
5.2
3.7
Note: These results ere within the 955 confidence interval for these
parameters.
F-46
-------
'•cology and environment, inc.
SpKWMtl in in* Environment
LABORATORY REPORT
FOR
Sapp Battery
Job No.: U-2779
Sample Date: 12/12/85
Date Received: 12/13/85
Sample Type: Water Comp
E & E Lab Number 85-
Sample Identity
Aluminum
Antiiiony
Arsenic
Cadmium
Lead
Manganese
Selenium
Sampled By: E & E, Inc.
Delivered By: Federal Expr"..'.
9101 Prep
FNW-09A Blank
results in mg/L
16.6
<0.06
0.014
<0.005
0.463
0.687
<0.05
<0.2
<0.06
<0.005
<0.005
<0.1
<0.015
<0.005
Analytical References;
U.S. EPA Contract Laboratory Program, Inorganic Statement of Work, 1934.
Supervising Analyst ^(JM^
date:
F-45
OS«I 14
recycled paper
niiil rmirmtniriii
-------
ecology and environment, inc.
lm*rnmcm*l SoKMtan m Ih* Envronm.ni
LABORATORY REPORT
FOR
Sapp Battery
Job No.: U-2689
Sample Date: 11/26-27/85
Date Received: 12/3/85
Sample Type: Water
E & E Lab Number 85- 8806
Sample Identity
Aluminum
An'imony
Ar;,tnic
Cadmium
Lead
Manganese
Sele n'um
FEW
IOC
35.1
<0.06
<0.005
<0.005
0.257
6.98
<0.01
RE: FM-2130
Sampled By: E & E, Inc.
Delivered By: Federal Expr-is
8807
DEW
IOC
8808
FEW
05B
8809
FEW
11C
Prep
Blank
all resultsin mg/L
45.2 <0.2 5.01 <0.2
<0.06 <0.06 <0.06 <0.0«?
<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.0f''>
<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.0)j
0.290 0.010 0.021 <0.00
5.91 <0.015 2.24 <0.01S
<0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
Analytical References;
U.S. EPA Contract Laboratory Program, Inorganic Statement of Work, 1 )84.
Supervising
Date:
j
F-48
-------
MEMORANDUM
TO: Rick Rudy
FROM: Gary Hahn M ^
DATE: January 6, 1986
SUBJECT: Sapp Battery Report; Job U-2689
CC: Lab File, QA/QC File
Attached is the laboratory report of the analysis conducted on four
samples received at the Analytical Services Center on December 3,
1985. Analysis was performed according to the procedures set forth •' i
U.S. EPA Contract Laboratory Program, Inorganic Statement of Work,
1914.
All .amples, on which this report is based, will be retained by E&E
for a period of 30 days from the date of this report, unless otherwi-t
instructed by the client. If additional storage of samples is
requested by the client, a storage fee of Sl.OO/sample container per
month will be charged for each sample, with such charges accruing
until destruction of the samples is authorized by the client.
GH/cp
enclosure
F-47
HIM! rmininnu-iti
-------
U-2689
QUALITY CONTROL FOR ACCURACY:
PERCENT DIFFERENCE—EPA QUALITY ASSURANCE MATERIALS
Concentrations in uq/L
Percent
Element Known Determined Difference
Aluninun 729 816 11.9
Antimony 101.5 96.1 5.3
Arsenic 26.7 26.4 1.1
Cattail* 39.0 45.7 17.2
Lead 42.7 42.0 1.6
Manganese 348 372 6.9
Selenium 10.9 10.2 6.4
F-50
-------
U-2689
QUALITY CONTROL FOR PRECISION
RESULTS Of ANALYSIS OF REPLICATE
ANALYSES Of WATER SAMPLES
Compound
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Cadiiun
Lead
Manganese
Selenium
E 4 E
Laboratory
No. 85-
8808
8808
8808
8808
3808
8808
8808
Original
Analysis
<0.2
<0.06
<0.005
<0.005
0.010
<0.015
<0.005
Replicate
Analysis
0.205
<0.06
<0.005
<0.005
0.0096
<0.015
<0.005
Relative
Percent
Difference
RPD
—
--
~
--
4.1
--
—
F-49
recycled paper
ulltl ••mmMimrlK
-------
MEMORAN. 1
TO: Rick Rudy
FROM: Gary Hahn
D4TI: December 13. 1985
SUBJECT: Sapp Battery Report; Job No. U-2566
Attached is the laboratory report of the analysis conducted on one
hundred and thirty-six samples received at the Analytical Services
Center on November 5, 1985. Analysis was performed according to U.L
F.PA Contract Laboratory Program, Inorganic Statement of Work, 1984.
Mil samples, on which this report is based, will be retained by E&E
for a period of 30 days from the date of this report, unless otherw; ;.?
instructed by the client. If additional storage of samples is
reauested by the client, a storage fee of Sl.OO/sample container pet
month will be charged for each sample, with such charges accruing
until destruction of the samples is authorized by the client.
GH/cp
enclosure
F-52
-------
SOIL SAMPLE ANALYTICAL DATA
F-51
recycled paper n-nliigt uml <-min>nniriu
-------
ecology and environment, inc.
InitmatKXWl Sp«ci*tmi tn tht 6nvwonm«ni
LABORATORY REPORT
FOR
Sapp Battery
Job No.:
U-2566
Sample Date: 10/29-11/4/85
Oatt Received: 11/5/85
Sample Type: Soil and Water
E & E Lab
Number
Customer
Number
7818
7819
7320
X821
7822
7823
7824
Prep Blank*
7825
7826
7827
7828
/829
/830
7831
7832
7833
7834
7835
FSS-10
FSS-11
FSS-12
FSS-13
FSS-14
FSS-15
DSS-15
--
FSS-16
FSS-17
FSS-18
OSS-18
FSG-45A
FSG-45B
FSG-45C
FSG-55A
FSG-558
FSG-55C
FSG-56A
pH. S.U.
38
21
04
3.99
11
94
5.76
4.?4
3.96
3.72
3.52
5.48
5.20
02
57
4.55
5.22
5.61
RE: FM-2040
Sampled By: E & E, Inc.
Delivered By: Federal Expr.- ;s
Lead
mg/kg as received
2.15
242
56.1
20.9
8.62
1670
1760
<0.005
76.4
96.2
179
169
68.2
8.55
3.99
1870
107
59.0
479
Solids %
'3
•II
•it
62
/9
'9
4
0
02
14
;'i
*mg 1
Analytical References;
U.S. EPA Contract Laboratory Program, Inorganic Statement of Work, 1:'84.
Supervising Analyst /£*
Date:
F-54-
-------
MEMORANDUM
TO: Rick Rudy
FROM: Gary H
DATE: January 21, 1986
SUBJECT: Amended Sapp Battery Report; Job No. U-2566
Attached is the amended laboratory report of the analysis conducted on
one hundred and thirty-six samples received at the Analytical Service.!
Center on November 5, 1985. Please replace the incorrect page with
the attached amended page. We apologize for any inconvenience this
may have caused. Analysis was performed according to U.S. EPA
Contract Laboratory Program, Inorganic Statement of Work, 1984.
All samples, on which this report is based, will be retained by E&E
for a period of 30 days from the date of this report, unless otherw .c
instructed by the client. If additional storage of samples is
requested by the client, a storage fee of Sl.OO/sample container per
month will be charged for each sample, with such charges accruing
until destruction of the samples is authorized by the client.
GH/cp
enclosure
F-53
recycled paper mil..** HIM! i-n\in>niii<-iii
-------
[7 ecology and environment, inc.
lm*m*t>on«4 Sptcirtm ft th« Environment
LABORATORY REPORT
FOR
Sapp Battery
Job No.:
U-2566
Sample Date: 10/29-11/4/85
Date Received: 11/5/85
Sample Type:
E & E Lab
Number
Soil and Water
Customer
Number
7801
7802
7803
7804
Prep Blank*
7805
7806
7807
7808
7809
7810
7811
7812
7813
7814
7815
7816
7817
FSB-05C
FSE-01A
DSE-01A
FSE-01B
--
FSE-01C
FSE-02A
FSE-02B
FSE-02C
FSS-01
FSS-02
FSS-03
FSS-04
FSS-05
FSS-06
FSS-07
FSS-08
FSS-09
PH, S.U.
4.28
4.66
4.89
4.66
4.27
4.55
4.47
4.37
29
91
50
6.21
00
17
29
4.31
4.56
RE: FM-2040
Sampled By: E & E, Inc.
Delivered By: Federal F>press
Lead
mg/kg as received
13.8
394
332
3.45
<0.005
2.00
13.2
1.89
95.9
218
3.59
10.4
97.9
271
3.04
7.30
13.5
10.0
Solids %
86
73
73
86
92
83
86
89
86
82
94
90
87
92
82
79
81
*mg/L
Analytical References:
U.S. EPA Contract Laboratory Program, Inorganic Statement of Work. 1984.
ro, \cl""l IH
Supervising Analyst
Date:
F-56
A
i*-^rk\w- /
-------
ecology and environment, inc.
LABORATORY REPORT
FOR
Sapp Battery
Job No.: U-2566
Sample Date: 10/29-11/4/85
Date Received: 11/5/85
Sample Type:
t & E Lab
Number
Prep Blank*
7785
7786
7787
7788
7789
7790
7791
7792
7793
7794
7795
7796
7797
7798
7799
7800
Soil and Water
pH, S.U.
Customer
Number
FSB-01A
FSB-01B
FSB-01C
FSB-02A
FSB-02B
DS8-02B
FSB-02C
FS8-03A
FSB-03B
FSB-03C
FSB-04A
FSB-04B
FSB-04C
FSB-05A
DSB-05A
FSB-058
36
07
17
86
74
64
02
02
5.00
4.97
5.70
4.75
4.52
5.17
RE: FM-2040
Sampled By: E & E, [nc
Delivered By: Federal Express
5.05
4.28
Lead
trig/kg as received
<0.005
43.2
11.5
2.57
8330
325
746
460
66,100
650
400
3780
219
128
543
654
9.43
'.-jlids %
86
85
84
92
87
87
77
88
91
86
90
88
85
90
91
88
*mg/L
Analytical References:
U.S. EPA Contract Laboratory Program, Inorganic Statement of Work, 1984.
Supervising Analyst X^-^k.
Date: <^<2a^{]} 5. /'.'
F-55
recycled paper
inttl fii*irtinim ril
-------
fj ecology and environment, inc.
'ntt>ntnon« SpKMtets en tn* Envnonnwnt
LABORATORY REPORT
FOR
Sapp Battery
Job No.: U-2566
Sample Date: 10/29-11/4/85
Date Received: 11/5/85
Sample Type: Soil and Water
E & E Lab
Number
7854
7855
7856
7857
7858
7859
7860
7861
7862
7863
7864
Prep Blank*
7865
7866
7867
7868
7869
7870
7871
7872
*mg/L
Customer
Number
FSG-86A
DSG-86A
FSG-86B
FSG-86C
FSG-87A
FSG-87B
FSG-87C
FSG-95A
FSG-95B
FSG-95C
FSG-96A
OSG-96A
FSG-968
FSG-96C
FSG-62A
FSG-62B
FSG-62C
FSG-64A
FSG-64B
pH, S.U.
.77
.80
.58
.23
.87
.39
.86
.27
.35
.37
6.61
,72
,80
,77
4.42
,20
,25
,73
4.69
RE: FM-2040
Sampled By: E & E, Inc.
Delivered By: Federal Express
Lead
mg/kg as received Sol ids %
90,000 90
22,300 88
43,800 88
46,700 88
1180 92
6090 82
9430 80
322 92
91.6 91
115 90
16,100 89
<0.005
169,000 91
96,600 86
872 87
102 91
22.7 88
6.34 87
16,500 91
818 93
Analytical References:
U.S. EPA Contract Laboratory Program, Inorganic Statement of Work, 1984.
Supervising Analyst .
Date:
F-58
^iL. /?S
-------
ecology and environment, inc.
IrmnwionM SMCUkra m tfw Cnwonm«i(
LABORATORY REPORT
FOR
Sapp Battery
Job No.:
U-2566
Sample Date: 10/29-11/4/35
Date Received: 11/5/85
Sample Type:
E & E Lab
Number
7836
7837
7838
7839
7840
7841
7842
7843
7844
Prep Blank*
7845
7846
7847
7848
7849
7850
7851
7852
7853
Customer
Number
FSG-56B
FS6-56C
FSG-65A
FSG-65B
FSG-65C
FSG-66A
FSG-66B
FSG-66C
FSG-75A
—
DSG-75A
FSG-75B
FSG-75C
FSG-76A
FSG-75B
FSG-76C
FSG-77A
FSG-77B
FSG-77C
Soil and Wa.ter
pH. S.U.
.15
.96
.34
.98
,89
.74
.84
,47
6.02
.73
.15
.18
.66
.47
.97
.44
.39
5.61
RE: FM-2040
Sampled By: E & E, Inc.
Delivered By: Federal Excess
Lead
mg/kg as received r»ol ids %
20.2 78
22.9 77
201 88
220 90
564 91
14.1 91
17.2 91
6560 89
511 89
<0.005
591 89
50.6 82
95.3 77
3770 85
8320 92
25,300 89
813 90
3940 90
5120 86
*mg/L
Analytical References:
U.S. EPA Contract Laboratory Program, Inorganic Statement of Work, .984.
Supervising Analys
Date:
F-57
^iiv I'-
paper
mill rmtnmtnrfii
-------
ecology and environment, inc.
Irmrrunond SpKMfctt «! th» Enwonmani
LABORATORY REPORT
FOR
Sapp Battery
Job Mo.:
U-2566
Sample Date: 10/29-11/4/85
Date Received: 11/5/85
Sample Type: Soil and Water
E & E Lab
Number
'891
7892
7893
7894
7895
7896
7897
7898
7839
7900*
7901*
7902*
7903*
7904*
7905*
Customer
Number
FSG-91A
FSG-91B
FSG-91C
FSG-53A
FSG-53B
FSG-53C
FSG-54A
FSG-548
FSG-54C
SBB-02
SBB-03
SBB-04
FSR-02
FSR-03
FSR-04
pH, S.U,
4.20
4.63
4.59
5.25
6.17
5.10
4.75
4.92
4.65
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
*mg/L
NR-Analysis Not Requested
RE: FM-2040
Sampled By: E & E, Inc.
Delivered By: Federal Expres;
Lead
mg/kg as received
636
342
258
2260
16,700
5310
177
17.6
53.9
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
0.029
0.155
1.48
Sol ds %
i!>
!!4
\\-
'.0
)}'
d'C
NK
N'
Analytical References:
U.S. EPA Contract Laboratory Program, Inorganic Statement of Work, 19fl.
Supervising
Date:
F-60
•7 <\
O'.-l '4
-------
ecology and environment, inc.
mammon* Sotcmm «tfl« Enyironmtnr
LABORATORY REPORT
FOR
Sapp Battery
Job No.:
U-2566
Sample Date: 10/29-11/4/85
Date Received: 11/5/85
Sample Type:
Soil and Water
E i E Lab
Number
7873
7874
7875
7876
7877
7878
7879
7880
7881
7882
7883
7884
Prep Blank*
7885
7886
7887
7888
7889
7890
Customer
Number
FSG-64C
DSG-64C
FSG-71A
FSG-71B
FSG-71C
FSG-73A
FSG-73B
DSG-73B
FSG-73C
FSG-82A
FSG-82B
FSG-82C
—
FSG-84A
FSG-84B
FSG-84C
FSG-85A
FSG-85B
FSG-85C
PH. S.U.
4.
4.
.82
.91
4.54
4.41
4.56
4.52
4.95
.45
.98
.18
.68
4.
4.
5.
4.
4.75
3.95
4.09
4.33
5.35
6.12
5.55
RE: FM-2040
Sampled By: E & E, Inc.
Delivered By: Federal Ext.
Lead
mg/kg as received 3olids
230 93
187 93
1680 84
212 90
601 87
37.2 93
27.8 93
63.3 92
20.4 91
8301 83
17.0 85
17.2 86
<0.005
336 89
163 89
141 87
1790 91
267 92
57.5 89
*mg/L
Analytical References:
U.S. EPA Contract Laboratory Program, Inorganic Statement of Work, .984.
^j yJ- /
Supervising Analyst /S't<• i i /W U~
01.114
recycled paper
it i-mirt.niitt-Mi
-------
U-2566
QUALITY CONTROL FOR PRECISION
RESULTS OF ANALYSIS OF REPLICATE
ANALYSES OF WATER AND SOIL SAMPLES
Element
Antimony
Cadmiun
Lead
pH
E & E
Laboratory
No. 85-
7839
7895
7904
7839
7895
7904
7812
7839
7B68
7904
7795
7895
7794
7804
7814
7824
7836
7846
7856
7867
7877
7887
7897
7905
Original
Analysis
<12
31.5
<0.06
<1
<1
<0.005
97.9
220
102
0.155
3780
16,700
4.97
4.66
4.17
5.76
5.15
6.15
6.58
5.77
4.56
4.33
4.75
1.49
Replicate
Analysis
<12
2J.7
<0.06
<1
<1
<0.005
116
121
101
0.149
4630
11,100
4.99
4.63
4.44
5.74
5.12
6.12
6.64
5.75
4.60
4.36
4.43
1.51
Relative
Percent
Difference
RPD
28.3
—
„
„
«
16.9
58.1
0.9
3.9
20.2
42.6
0.4
0.6
6.3
0.3
0.6
0.5
0.9
0.3
0.9
0.7
9.1
1.3
F-62
-------
ecology and environment, inc.
mammon* SCMCMMCI « mt tmmnmtm
LABORATORY REPORT
FOR
Sapp Battery
Job No.:
U-2566
Sample Date: 10/29-11/4/85
Date Received: 11/5/85
Sample Type: Soil and Water
RE: FM-2040
Sampled By: E & E, Inc.
Delivered By: Federal Express
E & E Lab Number 85-
7825
7826
7827
7828
Blank*
7894
7895
7896
7897
7898
7899
7900*
7901*
7902*
7903*
7904*
»mo/L
Customer Number
FSS-16
FSS-17
FSS-18
OSS-13
FSG-53A
FSG-53B
FSG-53C
FSG-54A
FSG-54B
FSG-54C
SB8 02
S8B 03
3BB 04
FSR 02
FSR 03
Antimony
Cauiium
mgAg as received
<0.06
0.005
31.5
18.7
<0.06
<0.06
<0.06
<0.06
<0.06
--0.005
<0.005
<. .005
'3.005
•0.005
Analytical References:
U.S. EPA Contract Laboratory Program, Inorganic Statement of Work, IJ34.
. ,' I
Supervising Analyst.- ' ^ '] / l<* '?"> ;
Date: ,;b 7f U. 4 ' '
il paper
F-61
..I.,,;, :„:,( , „.„
03 '114
recycled pacer
rruli>g\
-------
U-2566
QUALITY CONTROL FOR ACCURACY:
PERCENT DIFFERENCE—EPA QUALITY ASSURANCE MATERIALS
Concentrat lore in uq/L
Element
Antimony
Cadoiui
La«d
Known
101.5
39.0
435
42.7
42.7
42.7
42.7
42.7
42.7
42.7
42.7
42.7
Determined
123.6
41.9
448
44.4
41.4
40.4
40.0
43.8
45.1
41.0
40.5
39.1
Percent
Difference
21.7
7.4
3.0
4.0
3.0
5.4
6.3
2.6
5.6
4.0
5.2
8.4
Note: These results «re within the 955 confidence interval for these
parameters.
F-64
-------
U-2566
QUALITY CONTROL FOR ACCURACY: PERCENT RECOVERY
FOR SPIKED WATER AND SOIL SAMPLES
Element
Antimony
Cadniun
Lead
E & E
Laboratory
No. 85-
7839R*
7895R*
7904R*
7839R*
7895R*
7904R*
7839R»
786 8R»
781 2R»
7904R*
Original
Value
33.6
121
<60
<5
<5
<5
618
504
620
140
Amount
Added
(ug/L)
500
500
500
50
50
50
500
500
500
500
Amount
Determined
478
627
786
57.7
61.6
64.7
1104
1189
958
788
Percent
Recovery
88.9
101
157
115
123
129
97.2
1J7
67.6
1JO
•Results in ug/L because spiking performed during digestion procedure.
F-63
'ecvcied paper
-------
ecology and environment, inc.
Its
-------
MEMORANDUM
TO: Rick Rudy
FROM: Gary Hahn
DATE: January 10, 1986
SUBJECT: Sapp Battery Report; Job U-2571
CC: Lab File, QA/QC File
Attached is the laboratory report of the analysis conducted on thirt\
nine samples received at the Analytical Cervices Center on November >
1985. Analysis was performed according to U.S. EPA Contract
Laboratory Program, Inorganic Statement of Work, 1984.
For all analyses, the EPA Contract Required Detection Limits (CRDL)
we-e followed. However, since many samples required dilutions to
achieve the EPC CLP spike protocol, the reported detection limits m;"-
vary. All dilution factors are on record.
All samples, on which this report is based, will be retained by EiE
for a period of 30 days from the date of this report, unless otherwi .,
instructed by the client. If additional storage of samples is
requested by the client, a storage fee of Sl.OO/sample container per
month will be charged for each sample, with such charges accruing
until destruction of the samples is authorized by the client.
GH'cp
enclosure
F-65
•e(.vC!8d paoef oiil««m mill i-minimnmi
-------
-•cology and environment, inc.
PK*MII «i tfn Envuonmim
LABORATORY REPORT
FOR
Sapp Battery
Job No.:
Sample Date:
U-2571
11/4-5/86
Date Received: 11/6/85
Sample Type: Soil and Water
RE: FM-2040
Sampled By: E & E, Inc.
Delivered By: Federal Express
E & E Lab
Number
7963
7964
7965
7966
7967
7968
7969
7970
7971
7972
7973
Prep Blank*
7974*
7975*
Customer
Number
FSG-34A
FSG-348
FSG-34C
FSG-43A
FSG-438
FSG-43C
FSG-51A
DSG-51A
FSG-518
FSG-51C
EPA-1
--
SBB-06
FSR-05
Lead Antimony Cadmium
pH, S.U.
5.90
5.10
5.00
5.66
4.87
4.75
5.65
6.18
5.67
5.15
5.65
..
6.37
1.40
rag/kg
246
53.4
3.08
1740
690
690
19,200
22,700
84,200
15,300
<1
<0.005
<0.005
1.95
as received Solids %
<12 <1
110 2.20 ?>•
16.7 <1 '.;
<12 <1 i'R
..
<0.06 <0.005 T<
<0.06 <0.005 M?
*mg/L
NR-Analysis Not Requested
Analytical References:
U.S. EPA Contract Laboratory Program, Inorganic Statement of Work,
Supervising Analyst^
Date:
F-68
03'. l 14
-------
ecology and environment, inc.
intwnwionii So*eiMiti in nw Envuontrwni
LABORATORY REPORT
FOR
Sapp Battery
Job No.:
Sample Date:
Date Received:
Sample Type:
E & E Lab
Number
7951
7952
7953
7954
7955
7J56
7J57
7958
7959
7960
7961
7962
Prep Blank*
U-2571
11/4-5/86
11/6/85
Soil and
Customer
Number
FSG-69B
FSG-69C
FSG-78A
FSG-788
FSG-78C
FSG-79A
FSG-798
FSG-79C
DSG-79C
FSG-88A
FSG-88B
FSG-88C
—
Water
pH, S.U
5.35
5.88
5.92
5.70
5.71
5.60
5.55
5.04
4.95
5.00
5.10
6.17
--
RE: FM-2040
Sampled By: E & E, Inc.
Delivered By: Federal Express
Lead
mg/kg as received
11.0
7.66
59.0
75.6
59.2
5.83
7.19
<5
46.7
45.5
5.35
<0.005
Solids X
37
as
'39
"6
;<7
4
' 5
uo
'•'3
13
10
»mg/L
Analytical References;
U.S. EPA Contract Laboratory Program, Inorganic Statement of Work, H'
Supervising Analyst
Date: /b- lU Uf.-^, -I/ 6 , f>£7 <.''••'
If H
t*ry l***t (*
F-67
./
M
O.i .
recycled caper
lltlll
-------
QUALITY CONTROL FOR ACCURACY: PERCENT RECOVERY
FOR SPIKED SOIL SAMPLES
U-2571
Element
£ 4 E
Laboratory
No. 85-
Original
Vtlue
Anoint
Added
(ug/L)
Amount
Determined
Percent
Recot*ry
Antimony
7962 R
7975 R
<60
500
500
307
547
61
109
Cadmium
7962 R
7975 R
<5
50
50
49
68,0
98
136
Lead
7952 R*
7962 R*
7975 R
31.5
35.3
1942
50
50
500
84.0
49.6
2276
105
29
67
•Results in ug/l beceuM ipiking perforated during digtetion procedure.
F-70
-------
U-2571
QUALITY CONTROL FOR PRECISION
RESULTS OF ANALYSIS OF REPLICATE
ANALYSES OF WATER AND SOIL SAMPLES
Analysis
So Li da
pH
Antiaony
Cadmiua
Lead
E & E
Laboratory
No. 85-
7942
7952
7962
7972
7941
7949
7960
7973
7975
7973
7975
7952
7962
7973
7975
Original
Analysis
88
85
86
83
4.83
5.01
5.00
iiriu tn
-------
ecology and environment, inc.
n tr>« Envnonmtm
LABORATORY REPORT
FOR
Sapp Battery
Job No.: U-2601
Sample ,)ate: 11/6-8/85
Date Received: 11/13/85
Sample Type: Soil and 4 Waters
E & E Lab
Number 85-
8197
8198
8199
3200
8201
3202
8203
8204
8205
8206
3207
3208
8209
8210
8211
8212
3213
8214
8215
8216
Prep Blank
168*
Sample
Identity
FSA-05A
FSA-058
DSA-05B
FSA-05C
FSA-050
FSA-05E
FSA-06A
FSA-06B
FSA-06C
FSA-060
FSA-06E
FSA-07A
FSA-07B
FSA-07C
FSA-070
FSA-07E
FSA-08A
FSA-08B
FSA-08C
OSA-08C
--
pH, S.U
5.93
4.91
4.95
4.77
4.32
4.33
6.10
6.07
4.86
4.77
4.65
6.95
5.05
4.81
4.43
4.53
6.79
4.74
4.11
4.46
--
RE: FM-2040
Sampled By: E i E, Inc.
Delivered By: Federal Express
Antimony
142
857
325
148
360
208
157
71.2
148
799
74.8
86.5
<0.06
Lead
mg/kg
as received
41,000
111
113
74.8
41.7
29.1
155,000
57,000
6560
330
928
68,800
45,900
28,100
4290
1160
30,100
29,800
12,300
13,400
Cadmium
2.79
1.07
2.69
<0.005
X Solids
88
83
86
88
83
83
90
85
85
84
35
84
85
79
85
81
82
79
77
77
*mg/L
Analytical References:
U.S. EP/' Contract Laboratory Program, Inorganic Statement of Work, 1984.
Supervising Analyst /IL^1^ 'll'/")J//V-7. >
Date: * •/(V- Mfct *3~), ///T".._
F-72
OJI,
-------
U-2571
QUALITY CONTROL FOR ACCURACY:
PERCENT RECOVERY—
EPA QUALITY ASSURANCE MATERIALS
El
Concentration* In uq/l
Known D*t«ntin«d
P«rc«nt
R«covtry
Antimony
101. J
101.5
103.8
101.1
2.3
0.39
39.0
39.0
40.8
42.3
4.6
8.5
Lead
42.7
42.7
42.7
42.7
41.2
42.1
40.5
39.1
3.5
1.4
5.2
8.4
NOTE:
rMult* *r» ttttnln th« 95* conft-
interval for th«M p«r«wt«r».
F-71
ed caper
mill i-tivirttiinii ill
-------
ecology and environment, inc.
International $|MCi«fc*n m th« Environment
Job No
Sample
.: U-2601
Date: 11/6-8/85
Rl
Si
Datfi Received: 11/13/85 D<
Sampl ^
E & E Lab
Number 85-
8237
8238
8239
8240
8241
8242
8243
8244
8245
8246
. 8247
8248
8249
8250
8251
8252
8253
8254
8255
8256
8257
Prep Blank
172*
Prep Blank
173*
*mg/L
Type: Soil and 4 Waters
Sample
Identity pH, S.U.
DSA-09A 7.03
FSA-09B 5.29
FSA-09C 5.56
FSA-09D 5.27
FSA-09E 5.33
FSA-10A 7.96
FSA-10B 7.46
FSA-10C 6.64
FSA-10D 6.37
FSA-10E 6.03
FSA-11A 7.89
FSA-11B 4.84
FSA-11C 4.75
FSA-11D 5.07
FSA-11E 5.11
FSE-04A 5.67
FSE-04B 5.58
FSE-04C 6.25
FSE-05A 5.95
FSE-05B 6.19
DSE-05B 6.22
—
—
Antimony
49.9
<12
<12
<12
<12
27.6
16.8
<12
<12
<12
24.2
13.5
45.5
<12
<12
<12
<12
<12
18.6
<12
<12
<0.06
--
Analytical References:
LABORATORY REPORT
FOR
Sapp Battery
RE: FM-2040
Sampled By: E i E, Inc.
Delivered By: Federal Express
Lead
mg/kg
as received
12,500
536
367
9.33
10.6
10,800
86
54
54.9
48.2
7710
4750
8140
547
190
62.9
7.13
6.86
300
23.3
19.8
<5*
Cadmium
<0.005
Solids
83
82
75
67
66
83
76
86
84
83
81
82
70
85
87
86
77
76
76
84
82
U.S. EPA Contract Laboratory Program, Inorganic Statement of Work, 1984,
Supervising Anal yst.
Date:
1-1,
F-74
-------
hjjj ecology and environment, inc.
InltmtnonM ScwcxMU « thf Cnmoomtnt
LABORATORY REPORT
FOR
Sapp Battery
Job No.: U-2601
Sample Date: 11/5-8/85
Date deceived: 11/13/85
Sample Type: Soil and 4 Waters
RE: FM-2040
Sampled By: E & E, Inc.
Delivered By: Federal Expre-;
E i E Lab
Number 85-
8217
8218
8219
8220
8221
8222
8223
8224
8225
8226
8227
8228
8229
8230
8231
8232
8233
8234
8235
8236
Prep Blank
170*
Prep Blank
171*
Sample
Identity
FSA-08D
FSA-08E
FSA-01D
FSA-01E
FSA-02A
FSA-02B
FSA-02C
FSA-02D
FSA-02E
FSA-03A
FSA-038
FSA-03C
FSA-03D
FSA-03E
FSA-04A
FSA-04B
FSA-04C
FSA-04D
FSA-04E
FSA-09A
--
—
pH, S.U
4.81
4.49
5.40
5.74
4.49
4.65
4.60
4.76
4.87
4.88
4.45
4.65
4.72
4.24
6.94
5.35
5.57
5.09
5.17
6.75
—
—
Antimony
16.8
<12
<12
<12
<12
<12
<12
<12
<12
<.12
<12
<12
<12
<12
<12
<12
<12
<12
<1?
42~7
Lead
mg/kg
as received
4150
778
12.4
29.3
553
106
12.0
24.9
31.3
392
8.33
84.7
8.54
7.03
279
25.0
120
8.73
10.6
9390
Cadmium
<0.06
-------
MEMORANDUM
TO: Rick Rudy
FROM: Gary Hahn
DATE: December 19, 1985-
SUBEJCT: Sapp Battery Report; Job U-2575
CC: Lab File, QA/QC File
Attached is the laboratory report of the analysis conducted on thirt
nine samples received at the Analytical Services Center on November
7.19R5. Analysis was performed according to U.S. EPA Contract
Laboratory Program, Inorganic Statement of Work, 1984.
All .amples, on which this report is based, will be retained by E&E
for a period of 30 days from the date of this report, unless otherwi
instructed by the client. If additional storage of samples is
requested by the client, a storage fee of Sl.OO/sample container per
month will be charged for each sample, with such charges accruing
until destruction of the samples is authorized by the client.
GH/cp
enclosure
F-76
-------
ecology and environment, inc.
Intimation* SDCCMMII m in* Enwonnwrn
LABORATORY REPORT
FOR
Sapp Battery
Job No.: U-2601
Sample Date: 11/6-8/85
Date Received: 11/13/85
Sample Type: Soil and 4 Waters
RE: FM-2040
Sampled By: E & E, Inc.
Delivered By: Federal Expres:
E & E Lab
Number 85-
8258
8259
8260
8261
8262
8263
8264
8265
8266
8267
8268
8269
8270
8271
8272
8273
Prep
Blank 174*
Prep
Blank 176*
8274
8275
8276
8277
8278
Prep Blank
175*
Prep Blank
177*
Sample
Identity
FSE-05C
FSE-06A
FSE-06B
FSE-06C
FSL-01
DSL-01
FSL-02
FSE-03A
FSE-03B
FSE-03C
FSE-07A
FSE-073
FSE-07C
DSE-07C
FSE-08A
FSE-08B
—
..
FSE-08C
SBB-07*
FSR-07*
FSR 08*
FSR-09*
--
—
pH, S.U
6.44
5.68
6.67
6.55
6.89
6.88
6.88
6.61
6.79
6.73
5.68
5.96
6.35
6.34
2.66
3.15
--
.-
2.98
3.95
1.51
1.42
1.53
—
—
Antimony
14.4
21.9
51.0
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
<0.06
<0.06
NR
<0.06
<0.06
Lead
mg/kg
as received
61.7
283
9.80
6.25
3020
9670
27,500
174
6.39
<5
1110
46.1
4.81
3.89
216
170
<5
26.3
<0.001
1.77
0.059
0.051
<5
Cadmium
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
<0.005
0.007
NR
<0.005
<0.005
*mg/L
Analytical References:
U.S. EFA Contract Laboratory Program, Inorganic Statement of Work, 1984
Supervising Analyst 'JI&U.1
% Solids
84
76
83
82
78
79
32
76
81
80
89
87
86
36
85
77
79
NR
NR
NR
NR
Date:
9
recycled caper
retting* iHUl
-------
MEMORANDUM
TO: Rick Rudy
FROM: Gary Hahn M\ ^'^
DATE: January 17, 1986
SUBcJCT: Amended Sapp Battery Report; Job U-2575
CC: Lab File, QA/QC File
Attached is a amended laboratory report page of the analysis conduc!'?:
on thirty- nine samples received at the Analytical Services Center on
November 7,1985. Please replace the incorrect page with the attache*
amended page. We apologize for any inconvenience this may have
caused. Analysis was performed according to U.S. EPA Contract
Laboratory Program, Inorganic Statement of Work, 1984.
All samples, on which this report is based, will be retained by EiE
for a period of 30 days from the date of the original report, unless
otherwise instructed by the client. If additional storage of sample,
is requested by the client, a storage fee of Sl.OO/sample container
per month will be charged for each sample, with such charges accruing
until destruction of the samples is authorized by the client.
GH/cp
enclosure
F-78
-------
••oology and environment, inc.
im«m«oon» SMCIM«» m th4 Environment
LABORATORY REPORT
FOR
Sapp Battery
Job No.:
U-2575
Sample Date: 11/5-6/85
Date Received: 11/7/85
Samp"(e Type: Soil and Water
E & E Lab
Number
7984
7985
7986
7987
7988
7989
7990
7991
7992
7993
7994
7995
7996
7997
7998
7999
8000
8001
Prep Blank*
163
Customer
Number
ESB 06A
ESB 068
ESB 06C
FSG 15A
FSG 158
FSG 15C
FSG 24A
FSG 248
FSG 24C
FSG 25A
FSG 258
FSG 25C
FSG 97A
FSG 978
FSG 97C
FSC 01A
FSC 018
DSC 018
PH. S.U.
6.73
,77
.90
.41
.39
.11
4.67
21
23
13
11
04
7.03
78
50
8.54
7.26
7.61
RE: FM-2040
Sampled By: E & £, Inc.
Delivered By: Federal Express
Antimony Lead Cadmium
mg/kg as received
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
<12
<12
<12
-.
5300
3260
42.0
11.9
4.63
3.75
26.1
8.73
10.1
22.0
5.87
5.63
3640
29,600
5,010
257
20.6
16.6
<0.005
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
<1 .0
<1.0
<1.0
—
Sdids %
fcfi
86
' I
"7
.'5
J8
-8
36
:8
37
*mg/L
NR-Ana1ys
-------
U-2575
QUALITY CONTROL FOR PRECISION
RESULTS OF ANALYSIS OF REPLICATE
ANALYSES OF WAFER AND SOIL SAMPLES
Relative
E & E Percent
Laboratory Original Replicate Difference
Analysis No. 8*- Anal/sis Analysis RPO
pH 7987 5.41 5.37 0.7
8003 5.61 5.68 1.2
8014 5.44 4.51 18.7
Solida 7993 86 85 1.2
8004 89 88 1.1
8014 88 89 1.1
Antimony 8014 <12 <12
Cadmium 8014 <1 <1
Lead 7990 26.1 23.8 9.2
8014 3.98 3.47 14
8021 7120 7210 1.2
F-80
-------
ecology and environment, inc.
m *ma(ton«i So*etatwts tn th« En
LABORATORY REPORT
FOR
Sapp Battery
Job Mo.:
U-2575
Sample Date: 11/5-6/85
Date Received: 11/7/85
Sample Type: Soil and Water
RE: FM-2040
Sampled By: E & E, Inc.
Delivered By: Federal Expres:
E & E Lab
Number
Customer
Number
PH. S.U.
Antimony Lead Cadmium
mg/kg as received
8002
8003
8004
8005
8006
8007
8008
8009
8010
8011
8012
8013
8014
Prep Blank
165*
8015
8016
8017
8018
8019
8020
8021*
8022*
Prep Blank
166*
Prep Blank
167*
FSC QIC
FSC 02A
FSC 028
FSC 02C
FSG 14A
FSG 14B
FSG 14C
FSG 23A
FSG 238
FSG 23C
DSG 23C
FSG 33A
FSG 338
—
DSG 338
FSG 33C
FSA 01A
DSA 01A
FSA 01B
FSA QIC
FSR 06
SBB 05
• --
--
10
61
20
25
25
52
32
75
84
53
49
71
44
19
97
62
48
21
97
25
<12
169
<12
<12
<12
<12
<12
<12
17.3
<12
<12
<12
<12
6.54
8810
62.5
24.0
15.5
4.54
7.00
3060
4790
5710
4710
81.4
3.98
-------
U-2575
QUALITY CONTROL FOR ACCURACY:
PERCENT DIFFERENCE—EPA QUALITY ASSURANCE MATERIALS
Element
Antimony
Cadmium
Lead
Concentrations
K no 1*1
101.5
39.0
42.7
42.7
42.7
in uq/L
Determined
99.2
42.7
42.1
38.9
44.4
Percent
Difference
7.3
9.5
1.4
8.9
4.0
Note: These results are within the 958 confidence interval for these
parameters.
F-82
-------
U-2575
QUALITY CONTROL FOR ACCURACY: PERCENT RECOVERY
FOR SPIKED HATER AND SOIL SAMPLES
Original Amotxit Amount
Value Added Determined
E & E
Laboratory Percent
Analysis No. 85- (ug/L) Recovery
Antimony SOUR <60 300 263 52.6
Cadmiui SOUR <5 50 45.4 90.8
Lead 7990R 120 500 796 135
B014R 5.1 50 50.1 90.0
8021R 7210 500 7730 104
F-81
recycled paper ,->,,\,,^ „>»( .•n»ir,,mm-Mi
-------
MEMORANDUM
TO: Gerry Gallagher
FROM: Gary Hahn ..' //'M'
DATE: February 4, 1986
SUBJFCT: Sapp Battery Report; Job U-2817
CC: Lab File, QA/QC File
Attached is the amended laboratory report of the analysis conducted ro
fifty- three samples received at the Analytical Services Center on
January 9 and 13, 1986. The original did not contain results for your
sanple labelled FSB-030. Analysis was performed according to the
procedures set forth in U.S. EPA Contract Laboratory Program,
Inorganic Statement of Work, 1984.
All samples, on which this report is based, will be retained by E & E
for a period of 30 days from the date of this report, unless otherwise
instructed by the client. If additional storage of samples is
requested by the client, a storage fee of Sl.OO/sample container per
month will be charged for each sample, with such charges accruing
until destruction of the samples is authorized by the client.
GH/cp
enclosure
F-84
-------
MEMORANDUM
TO: Gerry Gallagher
FROM: Gary Hahn -J/M^'
DATE: January 31, 1986
SUBJECT: Sapp Battery Report; Job U-2817
CC: Lab File, QA/QC File
Attached is the laboratory report of the analysis conducted on fifty-
three samples received at the Analytical Services Center on January o
and 13, 1986. Analysis was performed according to the procedures set
fo'-t'rt in U.S. EPA Contract Laboratory Program, Inorganic Statement of
Work, 1984.
All samples, on which this report is based, will be retained by E & -1
for a period of 30 days from the date of this report, unless otherwise
Instructed by the client. If additional storage of samples is
requested by the client, a storage fee of Sl.OO/sample container per
month will be charged for each sample, with such charges accruing
until destruction of the samples is authorized by the client.
GH/co
enclosure
F-83
recycled paper ••• ••!"«» «»«l
-------
ecology and environment, inr,
international Spvcwfetts m tt»t Environmant
LABORATORY REPORT
FOR
Sapp Battery
Job No.:
Sample Date:
Date Received:
Sample Type:
E & E Lab
Number 86-
0256
0257
G258
U259
0260
0261
0262
0263
0264
0265
0266
0267
0268
Prep Blank*
0269
0270
0271
0272
0273
0274
U-2817
10/31-11/5/85
1/9,13/86
Soil
Customer
Number
FSG-65D
FSG-65E
FS6-66D
FSG-66E
FSG-67D
FSG-67E
FSG-750
FSG-75E
FSG-760
FSG-76E
FSG-77D
FSG-77E
FSG-78D
--
FSG-78E
FSG-86D
FSG-86E
FSG-87D
FSG-87E
FSG-88D
*mg L
RE: FM-2040
Sampled By: E & E, Inc.
Delivered By: Federal Expre ;
pH. S.U.
4.97
94
55
14
70
44
66
70
5.15
6.30
21
22
5.35
53
18
89
16
5.13
5.54
Solids, %
91
91
86
85
86
82
83
83
88
91
86
82
84
80
89
88
84
85
89
Lead, .ng/kg
as received
12.3
•C.4
'"S
:i'3
'.00
'\2
..'5
I' 1
\ .0
:.oi2
I'i.O
i:,20o
«,'2
'•03
. ,4
Analytical References;
U.S. EPA Contract Laboratory Program, Inorganic Statement of Work, 1
r»cyrl»<1 paper
Supervising Analyst^-
Oate:
F-86
-------
ecology and environment, inc.
InwnwaonM SoKWKn in lh« Envtfonnwm
LABORATORY REPORT
FOR
Sapp Battery
Job No.:
Sample Date:
Date Received:
Sample Type:
E & E Lab
Number 86-
Prep Blank*
0241
0°42
0;!42A
0243
0244
0245
0246
0247
0248
0249
0250
0X51
0252
0253
0254
0255
Prep Blank*
(J-2817
10/31-11/5/85
1/9,13/86
Soil
Customer
Number
FSB-02D
FSB-02E
FSB-03D
FSB-03E
FSB-04D
FSB-04E
FSG-64D
FSG-64E
FSG-71D
FSG-71E
FSG-85D
FSG-85E
FSG-91D
FSG-91E
FSG-150
FSG-15E
RE: FM-2040
Sampled By: E & E, Inc.
Delivered By: Federal Expre.:.
PH. S.U.
,76
,48
,58
,80
,93
,22
,35
,95
,93
,70
.15
,89
.85
.99
.70
4.69
Solids, %
82
81
87
90
89
90
90
78
95
97
86
84
82
86
78
76
Lead, -ig/kg
as received
<0.005
KK1
'.:!!
37.0
11 9
1 10
33.1
It'. 3
50.2
9A.O
2-1.2
7*".'? 9
7.-'-3
0.006
*mci/L
Analytical References;
U.S. EPA Contract Laboratory Program, Inorganic Statement of Work, 19i'4.
Supervising Analyst
\fl<
Date:
'\
''•cycled p»(>«f
F-85
? / /'.'/f
or 114
recycled paper
rruli*Kt mill rimmnmritl
-------
ecology and environment, inc.
International Sp*C«**ts m tb« Environment
LABORATORY REPORT
FOR
Sapp Battery
Job No.: U-2817
Sample Date: 10/31-11/5/35
Date Received: 1/9,13/86
Sample Type: Soil
E & E Lab
Number 86-
Prep Slank*
0284
C2J9
02 JO
0328
*mg/L
Customer
Number
FSG-34D
FSG-53D
FSG-53E
FSG-34E
RE: FM-2040
Sampled By: E & E, Inc.
Delivered By: Federal Express
Antimony
Cadmium
mg/kg as received
<0.06 <0.001
Analy.ical References;
U.S. EPA Contract Laboratory Program, Inorganic Statement of Work, 191U.
Supervising Analyst
!/?'*)/ ,'-
Date:
F-88
03l *
-------
ecology and environment, inc.
lnwm«!0n»l ScxCMMU m th« Environnwil
LABORATORY REPORT
I-UK
Sapp Battery
Job No.:
Sample Date:
Date Received:
Sample Type:
E & E Lab
Number 86-
0275
0276
0277
0278
i>279
U280
0281
0282
0283
0284
0285
0286
0287
C'288
0289
0290
0291
0292
0328
U-2817
10/31-11/5/85
1/9,13/86
Soil
Customer
Number
FSG-88E
FSG-950
FSG-95E
FSG-96D
FSG-96E
FSG-97D
FSG-97E
FSG-230
FSG-23E
FSG-34D
FSG-51D
FSG-51E
FSG-56D
FSG-56E
FSG-530
FSG-53E
FSG-540
FSG-54E
FSG-34E
RE: FM-2040
Sampled By: E & E, Inc.
Delivered By: Federal Express
pH. S.U.
.16
.31
.49
.19
6.32
5.04
.21
.40
.51
.55
5.42
6.21
.79
.88
.40
.76
.48
.29
5.18
Solids. X
86
91
89
91
90
87
38
69
68
93
88
91
91
92
87
35
77
80
93
Lead, mg/kg
as re;eived
5.61
l"-i
31.3
:-,:'
2:1
2 i2
?V.O
4. '3
211
IV 5
8.44
*ng/L
Analytical References:
U.S. EPA Contract Laboratory Program, Inorganic Statement of Work, I.9J/4.
Supervising An a 1 ys t
s j.. .
Date: _ \^HL^LL, Ml. /*, '•/
"
LL,
F-87
03> . 14
'ecyciad oaper
-------
QUALITY CONTROL FOR ACCURACY: PERCENT RECOVERY
FOR SPIKED SOIL SAMPLES
"lenient
Antimony
Lead
E & E
Laboratory
No. 85-
0328»
0251»
0262*
0277*
0292»
0279*
0328*
Original
Value
<60
48.4*
64.0
15.8
49.8
1.17
46.4
Amount
Added
(ug/L)
500
25
25
25
25
0.5
25
Amount
Determined
469
76.7
87.5
41.0
72.4
1.71
72.4
P'T':ent
S^rovery
JJ.8
1 n
'a.o
101
U.4
V.f
1Q!l
•Results In ug/L because spiking was performed during digestion procedure.
F-90
-------
U-2817
QUALITY CONTROL FOR PRECISION
RESULTS OF ANALYSIS OF REPLICATE
ANALYSES OF SOIL SAMPLES
Analysis
pH
Solids
Lead
Antimony
Cadmium
E & E
Laboratory
No. 85-
0243
0249
0270
0280
0290
0241
0260
0270
0280
OZ50
0292
0249
0260
0268
0279
0328
0279
0328
0279
0328
Original
Analysis
4.22
4.70
6.18
5.04
5.76
82
86
89
87
86
80
16.3
7.00
4.78
234
8.84,
<12
<12
<1
<1
Replicata
Analysis
4.20
4.75
6.23
5.05
5.77
34
86
90
87
87
80
9.98
9.40
4.45
195
4.17
<12
<12
<1
<1
Relative
Percent
Difference
RPO
0.5
1.0
0.8
0.2
0.2
2.4
0
1.1
0
1.2
0
48.1
29.3
7.2
18.2
71.8
«M>
—
•«•
—
F-89
recycled paper
-------
SEDIMENT SAMPLE
ANALYTICAL DATA
F-92
-------
U-Z817
QUALITY CONTROL FOR ACCURACY:
PERCENT DIFFERENCE—EPA QUALITY ASSURANCE MATERIALS
Element
Antimony
Cadmium
Lead
Concentrations
Known
101
3.30
42.7
42.7
in uq/L
Determined
104
3.45
42.1
42.6
Percent
Difference
3.0
4.5
1.4
0.2
Note: These results are within the 955 confidence interval for these
parameters.
F-91
'ecvc'ed caper
-------
0
ecology and environment, inc.
LABORATORY REPORT
FOR
Sapp Battery
Job Nc.:
U-2680
Sample Date: 11/15-26/85
Date Received: 12/2/85
Sample Type: Soil and Rinsate
RE: FM-2080
Sampled By: E & E, Inc.
Delivered By: Federal Expre.^
E & E Lab
Number 85-
8745
8746
8747
8748
8749
8750
8751
-8752
8753
8754
8755
8756
8757
8758*
Prep Blank*
Sample
Identity
FMK-06A
FMK -06B
FMK-06C
FMK -07 A
DMK-07A
FMK-07B
FMK-07C
FMK-08A
FMK-08B
FMK-08C
FMK-09A
FMK -098
FMK-09C
FRS-16
—
Antimony
mg/kg
as received
<12
<12
<12
146
131
<12
<12
216
<12
<12
<12
<12
<12
<0.06
<0.06
Cadmium
mg/kg
as received
<1
t*-r V,- /
F-94
/
-------
MEMORANDUM
T1: Rick Rudy .
FRO I Gary Hahn -4 ^'
DA1E: January 4, 1985
SUBJECT: Sapp Battery Report; Job No. U-2680
CC: Lab File, QA/QC File
Actached is the laboratory report of the analysis conducted on
fourteen samples received at the Analytical Services Center on
December 2, 1985. Analysis was performed according to the procedure-
set forth in U.S. EPA Contract Laboratory Program, Inorganic Stateme'.'.
of dork, 1984.
All samples, on which this report is based, will be retained by E&E
f ir a period of 30 days, from the date of this report, unless other*-'.}
ins'ructed by the client. If additional storage of samples is
rec jested by the client, a storage fee of Sl.OO/sample container pe
airnth will be charged for each sample, with such charges accruing
until destruction of the samples is authorized by the client.
GH/cp
enclosure
F-93
paper
-------
U-2690
QUALITY CONTROL FOR ACCURACY: PERCENT RECOVERY
FOR SPIKED SOIL SAMPLES
Element
Antimony
Cattail*
Lead
E & E
Laboratory
No. 85-
8755R"
8755R*
8755R*
Original
Value
7.0
<1
107
Amount
Added
(ug/L)
500
50
500
Amount
Dete rained
426
51.3
615
Recovery
83,8
103
102
•Results in ug/L. Spiking performed during the digestion procedure.
F-96
-------
QUALITY CONTROL FOR PRECISION
RESULTS or ANALYSIS OF REPLICATE
ANALYSES OF WAFER AND SOIL
U-2680
Compound
E 4 E
Laboratory
No. 85-
Original
Analysis
Replicate
Analysis
Relative
Percent
Difference
RPD
Antimony
Cadnim
Lead
pH
S Solids
8755
8755
8755
8746
8754
25.1
4.78
84
21.2
4.87
83
16.8
1.9
1.2
F-95
'e-:vcied caper
-------
MEMORANDUM
TO: Rick Rudy
FROM: Gary Hahn
LYTE: January 6, 1986
S'i: JECT: Sapp Battery Report, Job No. U-2688
CC: Lab File, QA/QC File
Attached is the laboratory report of the analysis conducted on
nineteen samples received at the Analytical Services Center on
Dec-.tnber 3, 1985. Analysis was performed according to the procedur .
'ei forth in U.S. EPA Contract Laboratory Program, Inorganic Statem^'t
of Work, 1984.
All samples, on which this report is based, will be retained by EiE
for a period of 30 days from the date of this report, unless otherw e
instructed by the client. If additional storage of samples is
requested by the client, a storage fee of Sl.OO/sample container pe
month will be charged for each sample, with such charges accruing
i..itil destruction of the samples is authorized by the client.
GH/'.p
pnclosure
F-98
-------
U-2680
QUALITY CONTROL FCR ACCURACY:
PERCENT DIFFERENCE—EPA QUALITY ASSURANCE MATERIALS
Concentrations in uq/L
Percent
Element Known Determined Difference
Antimony 101.5 122.2 20.J
lead 42.7 40.9 A.2
Notei These results are within the 955 confidence interval for these
parameters.
F-97
nml rMMrnmut nt
-------
U-2688
QUALITY CONTROL FOR PRECISION
RESULTS OF ANALYSIS OF REPLICATE
ANALYSES OF SOIL SAMPLES
Relative
E 4 E Percent
Laboratory Original Replicate Difference
Compound No. 85- Analysis Analysis RPD
Antimony 8798 <12 <12
8801 <12 <12
Cadmium 8798 <1 <1
8801 <1 <1
Lead 8801 238 394 49.4
pH 8796 4.30 4.30 0
Solids 8791 67 71 5.8
8802 83 83 0
F-100
-------
ecology and environment, inc.
Innminon*! SMettMtl in IIH f nwonm«nl
Job No.: U-2688
Sample Date: 11/26,27/85
Date Received: 12/3/85
Sample Type: Soil and Water
LABORATORY REPORT
FOR
Sapp Battery
RE: FM-2080
Sampled By: E & E, Inc.
Delivered By: Federal Express
E & E Lab
Number 85-
Prep Blank*
217
8787
8788
8789
8790
8791
8792
8793
8794
8795
3796
8797
8798
8799
8800
3801
8802
8803
8804*
8805*
Customer
Number
FMK-01A
FMK-01B
FMK-01C
FMK-02A
FMK-02B
FMK-02C
FMK-03A
FMK-038
OMK-03B
FMK-03C
FMK-04A
FMK-04B
FMK-04C
DMK-04C
FMK-05A
FMK-05B
FMK.-05C
FSR-17
FSR-18
pH, S.U. Antimony Cadmium Lead % Solk?
mg/kg as received
<0.06 <0.005 <0.005
7.05
00
35
10
50
45
30
35
55
30
50
05
4.25
30
05
05
4.00
NR
36.2
77.4
27.5
69.7
1.15
1.51
<0.06
<0.005-
<0.005
10,900
12,500
7.80
139
1280
12.3
115
81.6
65.7
60.2
1270
115
2.51
3.78
238
5.28
3.84
0.036
70
63
83
80
67
88
72
76
77
79
64
79
34
83
77
83
82
m-
NR
*mg/L
NR-Ana lysis Not Requested
Analytical References:
U.S. EPA Contract Laboratory Program, Inorganic Statement of Work, 1984.
Supervising Analyst -
Date:
>/-*• <* '"^ L»
j F-99 \
C1dlt4
nlii£% mul rmirmiMM iti
-------
P 0 Box 20382/160 Upton Or/JacKson. Ms 39209/601-922-8242/800-523-0659
7215 Pine Forest Rd./Pensacola. Fl. 32506/904-944-0301/800-874-0272
January 9, 1986
File No. 3.86J.02b
//U
/Y '•>
A' / '.
Hr. Andy C1 ifton
Ecology and Environment, Inc.
196 Sugg Road
Buffalo, NY 14225
OP;V Mr. Cl ifton:
Subject: EPS Project No. 3.85.1588.01
EPS Laboratory Report No. 3.85.1098 and
Enclosed are the corrected and conpleted analytical results for the SL 1
samples submitted to our Pensacola laboratory on November 15 and 19, '
..Please disregard all previous reports. We extend our apology for the
errors in the previous reports, and hope that this has not caused an;,
inconvenience.
We appreciate your business and hope you will keep us in mind for any
future analytical needs. Should you have any questions regarding thi*
report or require further information or assistance, please call me a
904-944-0301.
Sincerely,
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION SYSTEMS, IMC.
Manager of Analytical Services
OK/ch
Enclosures
cc: Ms. Kim Burton
-------
U-Z68B
QUALITY CONTROL FOR ACCURACY:
PERCENT OIFFERENCE—EPA QUALITY ASSURANCE MATERIALS
Concentrations in uq/V.
Percent
Element Knonn Determined Difference
Antimony 101.5 104.1 2.6
Cachiiun 39.0 46.5 19.2
Lead 42.7 42.0 1.6
435 489 12.4
F-101
lug* unir..nni. in
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION SYSTEMS, INC.
• O So. 103tl • 1«0 Uoton Onv« • jKkton, MS 39209
T«i«onoit 1601) 922 82*2
721S P.m Farm ROM .POUCOII ?•. 3230S
Ttiwnor* I9O41 9*4 0301
LABORATORY REPORT
111-.-
CLIENT Ecology and Environment, Inc.
LOCATION Buffalo, NY
DATE 01/08/86
INVO.CENO 6705/ch
1098-05 - OSA120
1098-06 - FSA12E
1098-07 - FSA13A
1098-08 - FSA138
COLLECTED BY Client
DATE COLLECTED 11/14-18/85
GATE RECEIVED 11/15419/85
DATE ANALYZED H/16 - 12/P/'85
LABORATORY SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION-
1 ., /. ANALYSES
Percent Sol ids
pH
Lead, mg/kg (WL-220.353)
Lead, mg/';g (WL-405.783)
Cadmium, mg/kg (WL»226.502)
Cadmium, mg/kg (WL-228.802)
Antimony, mg/kg
•••*!••••••••••
r 1098-05
78.2
3.45
68.4
—
<1.8*
<.50
<.20
COMMENT
1098-06
84.1
3.44
60.3
—
<1.6*
<.58
<.23
1098-07
90.9
1.86
98.6
—
<.56
<.56
0.22
?
1098-08 ^
83.1
3.30
>2,249
4,735
<2.9*
0.67
13.9
IliJI^HHIH
Analyses conducted in accordance with EPA 600/4-79-020, Methods for Chemicai Analysis
of Water and Wastes. March 1979.
Analyses performed in compliance with procedures specified for the Contract . iboratory
Program.
MA IAGCR. CHEMICAL LABORATORY
. ANALYTICAL SF VICES
F-104
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION SYSTEMS, iUC,
° ta' 2M8M '"_uJ"'r' °"'VJ!*,"10" MS 392« "'» '•« '«'« •— • '-««•'.. '• »5oe
Union* 16011932824}
T«l«onon. 1904) 944<03C,1
INVOICE NO
LABORATORY REPORT
CLIENT Ecology and Environment, Inc.
LOCATION Buffalo, NY
OATE 01/08/86
6705/ch
1098-01 - FSA12A
1098-02 - FSA12B
1098-03 - FSA12C
1098-04 - FSA120
COLLECTED BY- Cllent (158b)
OATECOLLECTEO 11/14-18/85
OATE RECEIVED 11/15419/85
DATE ANALYZED 11/16 . 12/0',85
LABORATORY SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION-
L/1Q
• IDENTIFICATION NUMBER
Percent Sol ids
PH
Lead, mg/kg (Wl-220.353)
Lead, mg/k} (WL "405. 783)
Cadmium, mg/kg (WL»226.502)
Cadmium, mg/kg (WL»228.802)
Antimony , mg/kg
tm
••••••••••••••
82.0 _j
7.28
>2,043
2716
<3.1*
<.60
6.25
COMMENT
1 V70-VC
85.2
6.04
426
402
»
67.4 . 71.8
3.46| 3.43
661 | 64.2
691
<1.4*( <1.6*
<.87J <.57
15.4 0.21
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^•E MTV^^I^^^^^^^^^^H
Analyses conducted 1n accordance with EPA 600/4-79-020, Methods for Chemica dialysis
of Water and Wastes. March 1979.
Analyses performed 1n compliance with procedures specified for the Contract laboratory
Program.
*0ata not used due to background interference ( AL > SOppm).
CERTIFICATION
MANAG^N,
WRECTOR,ANALYTICAL S£r >mm in
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION SYSTEMS, t:MC.
O to. 2O312 • 160 Upton Onv* • jK»on MS 39209
T.i«ono«. 1601)92713*2
72tS P,n« Cornt RoaO •'•HHCOK * L 3SSO«
T.i«jnon« l»0*l 9** 0301
LABORATORY REPORT
ia/in
CLIENT Ecology and Environment, Inc.
LOCATION Buffalo, NY
DATE 01/08/86
.NVO.CE NO.. 6705/ch
1098-13 - OSA13E
1098-14 - FSR10
1098-15 - FMT13A
1098-16 - FMT138
COLLECTED BY Client
DATE COLLECTED 11/14-18/85
OMTERECEIVED 11/15419/85
DATE ANALYZED H/16 - 12/04/85
LABORATORY SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
IDENTIFICATION I
1098-14 | 1098-15 \ 1098-16
Percent Solids
PH
Lead, mg/kg (WL-220.353)
Lead, mg/kg (WL«4p5.783)
Cadmium, mg/kg (WL-226.502)
Cadmium, mg/kg (Wl*228.802)
Antimony, mg/kg
mmm!Kf^mfmiiimmmm
77.9
3.33
151
150
<2.1*
0.92
0.46
COMMENT
Liquid
1.31
<.05
--
<.00£
<.OOS
<.002
64.3
5.58
20.1
_
, j A^|
<.35
85.9
4.30
26.3
—
<.62*
<.44
<.18
F/JHHH1
Analyses conducted 1n accordance with EPA 600/4-79-020, Methods for Chemical Analysis
of Water and Hastes. March 1979.
Analyses performed in compliance with procedures specified for the Contract i.noratory
Program.
*0ata not used due to background Interference (AL > SOppm).
CERTIFICATION
MANAGER. CHEMICAL LABOH/TOHY
2¥~
. ANALYTICAC Ser /IC6S
F-106
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION SYSTEMS, INC.
f O Sot 203U • 160 Uotan Onv< • JlcKion. MS 39209
T.nonoo. (601) 9228342
7219P.fi* Pornt Bow • FtnMCOIl. - ,. 323O6
T.l«onon« 19041 944 0301
LABORATORY REPORT-
CLIENT Ecology and Environment, Inc.
LOCATION. Buffalo, NY
OATE 01/08/86
INVOICE NO. 6705/ch
!3/lQ
1098-09 - OSA138
1098-10 - FSA13C
1098-11 - FSA130
1098-12 - FSA13E
COLLECTEOBY Client (1588)
DATE COLLECTED 11/14-18/85
DATE RECEIVED H/15419/85
DATE ANALYZED 11/16 . 12/PT'85
LABORATORY SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
^^^^^^•M^^^v-vTmTT^^^^^^^^^^^^H
Percent Sol ids
PH
Lead, mg/kg (WL«220.353)
Lead, mg/kg (WL*405.783)
Cadmium, r.,g/kg (Wl»226.502)
Cadmium, mg/kg (WL-228.802)
Antimony, mg/kg
..
m^mi^m^mmmmmmm
1098-09
34.8
3.23
>2,194
8,842
<.77«
0.78
13.6
COMMENT
1098-10
79.0
3.10
>2,482
6,317
<4.0*
<.50
20.1
1098-11
52.3
3.12
217
200
5.52
4.32
0.56
.
1098-12
80.5
3.29
254
210
<1.9*
1.27
0.64
'iJL^^^^^I
Analyses conducted 1n accordance with EPA 600/4-79-020, Methods for Chemical Analysis
of Water and Wastes. March 1979.
Analyses performed 1n compliance with procedures specified for the Contract l.-.boratory
Program.
*0ata not used due to background interference ( AL > BOppm).
CERTIFICATION
MANAGER. CHtMICAL LAiOB/TORY
fr * rflRECTO«! AIWUVTICAt SI':', ICCS
F-105
recycled paper
ami rii\inHtntrlil
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION SYSTEMS, IMC.
' O 8o« 233(2 • t«0 ugion Onv. . jM«ion MS 392O9
Tiimnon* 16011 923 §242
721S ».»»• Furor lloM • r>nucoi> f . 32SO6
T«i«or,on« I9O4I 94« 0301
LABORATORY REPORT
.inqp
CLIENT Ecology and Environment, Inc.
LOCATION Buffalo, NY
OATE 01/08/86
.NVOICENO 6705/cn
1098-21 - DMT11B
1098-22 - FMT10A
1098-23 - FMT10B
1098-24 - FMT09A
COLLECTED 8V C1 1 6flt ( 1 588 )
DATE COLLECTED ll/H-18/85
OATEBECEIVEO U/15S19/85
DATE ANALYZED U/lfi . 12/04/85
LABORATORY SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
Percent Sol ids
PH
Lead, mg/kg (WL-220.353)
Lead, mg/kg (WL»405.783)
Cadmium, mg/kg (WL«226.502)
Cadmium, ,ng/kg (WL»228.802)
Antimony, mg/kg
81.9
4.78
5.4
..
<.43
<.43
<.17
COMMENT
27.9
4.15
212
191
<1.56«
1.21
0.87
71.9
3.54
28.9
..
<.47
<.47
<.19
f
23.1
4.38
99.7
..
<1.53*
<1.10
<.44
I^J^H^HI
NUMBER I
1098-23
1098-24
Analyses conducted 1n accordance with EPA 600/4-79-020, Methods for Cnemlcs Analysis
of Mater and Wastes. March 1979.
Analyses performed in compliance with procedures specified for the Contract Laboratory
Program.
*Data not used due to background interference (AL > SOppm).
CERTIFICATION.
MANAGER. CHEMICAL LABORATORY
, ANAtYTICALSt •' /ICES
F-108
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION SYSTEMS, IMC.
' °- ™M^: T.^.a—MS '- * • -3JS08
LABORATORY REPORT-
CLIENT Ecology and Environment, Inc.
LOCATION Buffalo, NY
OATE 01/08/86
INVOICE NO 6705/cn
1098-17 - FMT12A
1098-18 - FMT12B
1098-19 - FMT11A
1098-20 - FMT118
COLLECTED BY Client (1588^
DATE COLLECTED- 11/14-18/85
OAT6 RECEIVED 11/15*19/85
OATE ANALYZED U/16 - 12/0'l/35
LABORATORY SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION-
**- .^^••••^••••incMTictrATinu •IIHUBCEI^MHI
1 . ANAI V<;P<; • ^^BV!W!M^I
Percent Solids
pH
Lead, mg/kg (WL-220.353)
Lead, mq/kg (WL-405.783)
Cadmium, mg/kg (WL»226.502)
Cadmium, mq/kq (WL-228.802)
Antimony, mg/kg
IU70-1 /
73.4
4.15
10.1
_.
<.63
<.63
<.25
1 nOfl 1 SJ ^ nno i n
1U5O-18
77.7
3.70
57.0
— —
<1.05*
<.66
<.16
if- __
IU7O-15
66.8
5.48
34.0
_ ^
<.80<
<.31
0.36
1 , K COMMENT . '-^
81.2
4.71
10.7
<.40
0.16
Analyses conducted 1n accordance with EPA 600/4-79-020, Methods for Chemica; '.nalysis
of Water and Wastes. March 1979.
Analyses performed 1n compliance with procedures specified for the Contract Laboratory
Program.
*0ata not used due to background interference ( AL > SOpprn).
CERTtFICATION
MANAGtR, CHEMICAL L^IOMATORV
F-107
6l»ieCTO»k. ANALVTICAL W. ICES
recycled paper
rn\iriinntriil
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION SYSTEMS, INC.
f O SOB 2031] • 160 Union Driv. . JKkion. MS 392O9
T«l«ono«« <«01> 922-»2«2
7215 Pm« Forvtt Road • *»nwcoit, ' L 32506
T*l«onon( (9041 944 030"
LABORATORY REPORT
as.ingp
CLIENT Ecology and Environment, Inc.
LOCATION. Buffalo, NY
DATE 01/08/86
.NVO.CENO..
1098-29 - DMT08A
1098-30 - FMT08B
1098-31 - FMH15A
1098-32 - OMH15A
COLLECTED BY Client ( 15£f,'
DATE COLLECTED 11/14-18/85
DATE RECEIVED H/15419/85
DATE ANALYZED \\/\S - 12/0<- /85
LABORATORY SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
• IDENTIFICATION NUMBERI
1098-30 | 1098-31
1098-32
Percent Sol ids
pH
Lead, mg/kg (WI-220.353)
Lead, mg/kg (WL-405.783)
Cadmium, mg/kg (WL-226.502)
Cadmium, mg/kg (Wl«228.802)
Antimony, mg/kg
1 V
60.0
4.12
34.3
m —
<.56*
<.31
<.12
COMMENT
76.2
4.02
33.2
..
<.69*
<.29
<.ll
••••
15.5
4.20
137.6
._
<2.04
<2.04
2.04
••••
14.2
4.21
183.8
.-
<2.62
<2.62
4.19
Analyses conducted 1n accordance with EPA 600/4-79-020, Methods for Chemical Analysis
of Water and Wastes. March 1979.
Analyses performed in compliance with procedures specified for the Contract laboratory
Program.
*0ata not used due to background Interference (AL > SOppm).
CERTIFICATION
MANAGER. CHEMICAL LABORATORY
, ANALYTICAL SE 'VICES
F-110
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION SYSTEMS, INC.
CO to* 203*1 • ISO uoion D"v« . Jicktofl MS 39209 7S1S Pin. Ftjrnt ROM . PtnueoK. PL 32S06
T.i«onen«. 16011 922 »242 Ttl«cnon«. (9041 944-0301
LABORATORY REPORT
'7/10
CLIENT Ecology and Environment, Inc.
LOCATION- Buffalo, NY
DATE 01/08/86
INVO.CENO..
1098-25 - FMT09B
1098-26 - FMT07A
1098-27 - FMT078
1098-28 - FMT08A
COLLECTED BY C11 ent (
OAT6 COLLECTED H/14-18/85
DATE RECEIVED- H/15&19/85
DATE ANALYZED 11/16 . 12/04,,15
LABORATORY SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
ANALYSES
Percent Solids
PH
Lead, mg/kg (WL-220.353)
Lead, mg/kg (WL«405.783)
Cadmium, mg/kg (WL«226.502)
Cadmium, mg/kg (WL-228.802)
Antimony, mg/kg
1
^mmmmmmmmmmmm
i noo oc
73.6
4.20
62.0
__
<1.19«
<.54
<.22
COMMENT
• IDENTIFICAT
1 (1QH 7f\
14.3
3.90
269
..
<2.72
<2.72
8.71
ON IMIIMRFRH
1 r»QR-?7
14.3
3.49
<26.1
—
<2.61
<2.61
1.04
•tfVI^^^HB^^
. nna jt>
60.1
4.04
22.7
--
<.49
<.49
<.20
EI9HH1
Analyses conducted 1n accordance with EPA 600/4-79-020, Methods for Chemical Malysis
of Mater and Wastes. March 1979.
Analyses performed In compliance with procedures specified for the Contract I \horatory
Program.
*0ata not 'jsed due to background interference (AL > SOppm).
CERTIFICATION
MANAGE*. CHEMICAL LAIOMATOMV
DIMCTOW, ANAl YTICAL SIR VICES
F-109
recycled paper
unit rn«irni
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION SYSTEMS, XNC.
O fo» 2O3*2 • ICO ueton Or.v« • J*c»on MS 39209
Tdwnon* 16011 922 82*2
7215 P>«> form Row) • »«n««col«. ' L 32506
T.l«onon. 19041 944 03C
LABORATORY REPORT
Ecology and Environment, Inc.
LOCATION Buffalo, NY
OATE 01/08/86
.NVO.CENO 6705/cn
in/in
1098-37 - FMH13B
1098-38 FMH12A
1098-39 - FMH12B
1098-40 - FSR11
COLLECTED BY Cl 1eflt ( 1 £*•»»)
DATE COLLECTED ll/14-18/8b
OATE RECEIVED 11/15419/8!
OATEANALYZED ii/ie - 12/C4/85
LABORATORY SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
Percent Sol ids
pH
Lead, i..i,/kg (WL-220.353)
Lead, mg/kg (WL-405.783)
Cadmium, mg/kg (WL-226.502)
'Cadmium, mq/kq (WL-228.802)
Antimony , mg/kg
15.3
3.18
82.4
..
<3.22
<3.22
3.86
COMMENT
23.2
3.60
366
250
<1.76
<1.76
5.98
37.5 ' Liquid
3.73 1.29
108 | <.05
-- !
<1.96' <.005
<.89 <.005
0.71 t 0.004
1
i
1
i
H^^^^^R^H^HHIH
Analyses conducted 1n accordance with EPA 600/4-79-020, Methods for Chemic?' Analysis
of Water and Wastes. March 1979.
Analyses performed in compliance with procedures specified for the Contract .aboratory
Program.
•Data not used due to background interference (AL > 50ppm).
CERTIFICATION
MANAGER, CHEMICAL LABORATORY
OirdiTOR.-ikM^YTICAL ST!• VICES
F-112
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION SYSTEMS, IMC.
f O «o. 20313 • 160 ueion Dr.v. . j.c»,on MS 39209
T»l«o«on« (601) 927 83*3
« farnt *o*a ' P»n,»eoU. *u J2SO8
T.l«ohon«. 190*1 944.0301
CLIENT
LOCATION-
DATE
INVOICE NO
LABORATORY REPORT
Ecology and Environment, Inc.
Buffalo, NY
01/08/86
6705/ch
;q/in
1098-33 - FMH15B
1098-34 - :-MH14A
1098-35 - FMH14B
1098-36 - FMH13A
COLLECTEDav Cl 1 60t ( 1 580 I
DATE COLLECTED 11/14-18/85
DATE RECEIVED. H/15J19/85
DATE ANALYZED U/16 . 12/04/85
LABORATORY SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION-
^^^^^^^^^^^•^^^^VTTFI & i, i i ^^^^•^^^^mmm^pv . «%nM -. .*
Percent Solids
OH
Lead, mg/kg (WL-220.353)
Lead, mg/kg (WL»405.783)
Cadmium, mg/kg (Wl-226.502)
Cadmium, mg/kg (WL»228.802)
Antimony. Mg/kg
1U-JO- JJ
16.1
4.02
32.2
..
<2.51
<2.51
1. 01
1U7O- J4
13.3
3.59
692
820
<2.74
<2.74
42.3
iuyo- JD
18.4
3.26
72.8
100
<2.49
2.99
2.99
,_
iu~»o- jo
15.6
3.43
410
510
4.05
5.07
16.2
| COMMENT . Ht
Analyses Conducted 1n accordance with EPA 600/4-79-020, Methods for Chemica; 'nalysis
of Mater and Wastes. March 1979.
Analyses performed 1n compliance with procedures specified for the Contract i iboratory
Program.
*0ata not used due to background interference (AL > SOppm).
CERTIFICATION
MANAGER, CHEMICAL LAjOftATOMY~
F-lll
. ANALYTICAL SEK '>CES
recvciea
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION SYSTEMS, IMC.
f O fe» 2O313 • HO Ueton Or.v« • J«c«ion MS 393O9
T««ohoew (SOU 932 iJ«5
7215 'in. Form Moid • *tnMCOi> PL "2504
T«t«onon« 19041 944-0301
LABORATORY REPORT
;-i i i
'?nn
CUIENT Ecology and Environment, Inc.
LOCATION Buffalo, NY
OATE 01/08/86
INVOICE NO. 6705/ch
1114-05 - FMT05A
1114-06 - FMT05B
1114-07 - FMT04A
1114-08 - FMT04B
COLLECTEDav Client (1588'
DATE COLLECTED H/14-18/85
OATEBECEIVED H/15419/85
DATE ANALYZED U/16 . 12/04/35
LABORATORY SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
• IDENTIFICATION NUMBERI
1114-06 I 1114-07 ! 1114-08
Percent Sol ids
PH
Lead, mg/kg (WL-220.353)
Lead, mg/kg (WL»405.783)
Cadmium, mg/kg (WL-226.502)
Cadmium, mg/kg (WL-228.802)
Antimony, mg/kg
63.7
4.22
587
520
<2.54*
<.55
0.55
COMMENT
78.6
3.85
25.2
—
<1.22*
<.47
<.19
60.2
4.21
324
250
<.74*
<.53
<.21
77.9
3.95
69.7
70
<.50
<.50
<.20
Analyses conducted 1n accordance with EPA 600/4-79-020, Methods for Chemical ',ialys1s
of Water and Wastes. March 1979.
Analyses performed 1n compliance with procedures specified for the Contract I. Moratory
Program.
*0ata not used due to background interference (AL > SOppm).
CERTIFICATION
MANAGER. CHEMICAL LA8OHTOMV
. ANALYTICAL SERVICES
F-114
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION SYSTEMS, INC.
' O 8oa 2O392 • f<0 UDton Onv« • jacftton MS 39209
T.lwnon.. I«01I 922 «2«2
7215 P.n* Fornt «o.d • P*nucol«. « . 32906
T«l«CHOn« 19041 944 0301
LABORATORY REPORT
35-1 1 1 A
CLIENT Ecology and Environment, Inc.
LOCATION Buffalo, NY
OATE 01/08/86
D 6705/ch
1114-01 - FSR12
1114-02 - FSR13
1114-03 - FSR14
1114-04 - FSR15
COLLECTED8Y
DATE COLLECTED
DATE RECEIVED
OATE ANALYZED
Client (1583)
11/14-18/85
H/15419/85
n/lfi .
LABORATORY SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
! i y i n
IIOENTIFICATION NUMBERI
Percent Solids
PH
Lead, wi/' 50ppm).
CERTIFICATION
MANAOCR. CHEMICAL LA80R4TOMV
F-U3
. A^A^YTICAL Sf RVlCH
recycieo paper
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION SYSTEMS, IIUC.
f O lo« 10313 • '«O UB'an Oriv* • Jjclion MS 39209
T««enon* 160119228242
7215 f SOppm).
CERTIFICATION
MANAGER. CHEMICAL LABORATORY
w
F-116
. ANALYTICAL SI'I VICES
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION SYSTEMS, INC.
O BOK 2O382 • ISO Uotgn Qriv* • JKMQn MS 39209
T«l«jnon« 1801) 927 8242
7215 Pm. form Hota • Pmucan. ft 32S06
T«l«on0n« 19041 944-0301
LABORATORY REPORr
-111A
CLIENT Ecology and Environment, Inc.
LOCATION Buffalo, NY
OATE 01/08/86
INVOKE NO- 67Q5/ h
LI/I n
1114-09 - FMT03A
1114-10 - FMT03B
1114-11 - FMH09A
1114-12 - rMH098
COLLECTED BY Client (1588)
DATE COLLECTED H/14-18/85
DATE RECEIVED H/15&19/85
DATE ANALYZED. U/lfi . 12/(M'35
LABORATORY SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
• IDENTIFICATION NUMBERI
Percent Sol ids
PH
Lead, mg/kg (WL-220.353)
Lead, mg'kg (WL«405.783)
Cadmium, mg/kg (WL-226.502)
Cadmium, mg/kg (WL-228.802)
Antimony, mg/kg
1
1 1 iW?
59.3
4.69
593
560
<.76*
0.66
0.66
COMMENT
80.2
3.97
57.5
60
<.61
<.61
<.24
67.6
3.44
136
100
<.54
<.54
0.76
82.6
3.52
31.2
_ —
<.38
<.38
<.15
Analyses conducted In accordance with EPA 600/4-79-020, Methods for Chemical Analysis
of Water and Wastes. March 1979.
Analyses performed 1n compliance with procedures specified for the Contract Moratory
Program.
*0ata not used due to background Interference (AL > 50ppm).
CERTIFICATION
MANAGER. CHEMICAL LAMMATOflY
F-115
AM^LVTICAL SIM < ICES
recycled paper
Hn«l
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION SYSTEMS, K'fC.
• O loi 1O3»2 • 140 Uoion Onv« • JKKion MS 39209
T.l«oh0n« (6011
7215 *m» *or«t Road • F.nt«col« c 12SO6
T«i«onon. |90«l 944-030
LABORATORY REPORT
35-11.1.4
.fi/in
CLIENT Ecology and Environment, Inc.
LOCATION Buffalo, NY
OATE 01/08/86
•NVOICENO 6705/cn
COLLECTED BY C11 6tlt ( 1 588 .
OATE COLLECTED H/14-18/85
OATE RECEIVED H/15419/85
OATE ANALYZED. U/16 - 12/04,85
LABORATORY SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
1114-21 - FMH03A
1114-22 - FMH038
1114-23 - FMH04A
1114-24 - FMH04B
IDENTIFICATION NUMBERI
1114-22 1114-23
Percent Sol ids
pH
Lead, mg/kg (WL-220.353)
Lead, mo/t-g (WL -405. 783)
Cadmium, mg/kg (WL-226.502)
Cadmium, mg/kg (WL -228. 802)
Antimony, mg/kg
64.8
3.72
46.7
...
<.62
<.62
3.00
81.6
3.38
6.3
„_
<.45
<.45
<.18
75.4
3.44
16.7
.-
0.49
0.49
<.20
79.6
3.40
19.7
--
<.52*
<.43
<.17
1114-24
COMMENT
Analyses conducted in accordance with EPA 600/4-79-020, Methods for Chemical Analysis
of Wate" and Wastes. March 1979.
Analyses t-erformed in compliance with procedures specified for the Contract laboratory
Program.
*0ata not used due to background interference (AL > SOppm).
CERTIFICATION
MANAG «. CHEMICAL LABOMATBRV
'
DIRECTOR, ANALYTICAL S*'> CES
F-118
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION SYSTEMS, IMC.
O Ban 20382 • 160 Uoton Onv« • JKKIOH MS 39209
T SOppm).
CERTIFICATION
MANAG/N,
F-117
JiMCCTOT. ANALYTICAL SCR CSS
recycled paper
ci II|«IE\ 1*114! rmirtiniftfcii
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION SYSTEMS, INC.
' O to> 20362 • 160 Uaton Oriv* • JKHian MS 39209
TKaonon* (60119236242
7215 »cn« Farm Raid • »«m«col« H. J2SO6
Tn«non« 19041 944 030 i
LABORATORY REPORT
85-1 114
CLIENT Ecology and Environment, Inc.
LOCATION Buffalo, NY
OATE 01/08/86
INVOKE NO. 6705/ch
1114-29 - FMH07A
1114-30 - FMH07B
1114-31 - OMH07B
1114-32 - FMH08A
COLLECTEDBY Client (1588!
DATE COLLECTED H/14-18/85
OATE RECEIVED H/15419/85
OATE ANALYZED- U/16 . 12/QA/85
LABORATORY SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
Ifl/lQ
• IDENTIFICATION NUMBERBB
I 1114-31 i 1114-32
Percent Solids
PH
Lead, mg/kg (WL-220.353)
Lead, mg/kg ( WL -405.783)
Cadmium, mg/kg (WL«226.502)
Cadmium, mg/kg (WL-228.802)
Antimony, mg/kg
^ .
^•n^HHH^HIH^Hi
48.5
3.49
109
_ _
1.20
1.35
10.5
COMMENT
66.2
3.47
39.3
_ —
<1.12*
0.7
<.22
69.8
3.50
31.4
• «•
<.91*
0.81
<.20
52.6
3.48
61.0
__
<1.64*
0.70
1.29
wi^^^m
Analyses conducted 1n accordance with EPA 600/4-79-020, Methods for Chemical Analysis
of Water and Wastes. March 1979.
Analyses performed in compliance with procedures specified for the Contract laboratory
Program.
•Data not used due to background Interference (AL > SOppm).
CERTIFICATION
MANAGER. CHCMICAL LABORATORY
DIRECTOR. ANALYTICAL SERVICES
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION SYSTEMS, IMC.
f O •»• 2O38J . 180 Uocon Onv. . jKKton. MS 39209
T.l«,hon. 18011 922 8742
7219 »in. Fornt «o«d • P.nucolt. f . 32SO8
T.l»noo« 19041 944-0301
LABORATORY REPORT
CLIENT Ecology and Environment, Inc.
LOCATION Buffai0t NY
DATE 01/08/86
INVOKE NO
1114-25 - FMH05A
1114-26 - FMH05B
1114-27 - FMH06A
1114-28 - FMH06B
COLLECTEDBY Client (158B1
DATE COLLECTED 11/14-18/85
DATE RECEIVED. H/15419/85
DATE ANALYZED' \\/\6 . 12/0-1/85
LABORATORY SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
17/1 n
.7 ANALYSES
Percent Sol ids
PH
Lead, mg/kg (WL-220.353)
Lead, mi/ kg (WL*405.783)
Cadmium, ng/kg (WL-226.502)
Cadmium, mg/kg (WL»228.802)
Antimony, mg/kg
1
1 1 1 A 2C
50.4
3.38
103
..
<.75
<.75
10.7
COMMENT
1111 9*
72.9
3.44
19.8
..
0.88
<.55
0.22
i i i A 97
14.9
3.71
251
--
3.21
3.74
47.1
1114 ?fl
19.1
2.79
SOppra).
CERTIFICATION
MANAGE*. CHEMICAL LABORATORY
F-119
4/^t^ s-i*-^?^^
DIRECTOR. «N«LYTICALSTM vict s
recycled paper
ffulof\ ttnti
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION SYSTEMS, If 1C.
O §OM ]O3t3 • 180 Do ton Onv. . Jickion. MS 392O9
Tw«ol»on« ISO!) 932 «34J
7215 Pm« farm «o«a • PtnucoK F..32SO6
T«i SOppm).
CERTIFICATION
CHEMICAL LAtONATOMV
./(&
^(^
EC70R. ANALYTICAL SER\ II
DUUC^OR. ANALYTICAL SER\ ICES
F-122
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION SYSTEMS, IMC.
O Bo* 20383 • 160 Upton Oriv* • Jacxion MS 39209
T«l«onon« 18011 93J 8242
7219 fmt Farm ROM • Piniaeoll. ' L 32906
T««onon« I9O4) 944.0301
1 • LABORATORY REPORT
CLIENT
LOCATION
DATE:
INVOICE NO :
™^^-^^— ^—
Ecology and
Buffalo, NY
01/08/86
6705/ch
Environment, Inc.
COLLECTED 8X
DATE COLLECTED
DATE RECEIVED.
DATE ANALYZED-
I " ., LABORATORY SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
Hi is 11 ' Tin 1
Client (1588^
11/14-18/85
11/15*19/85
11/16 - 12/0*785
••MBfcil-HHHH
1114-33 - FMH088
1114-34 - OMH08B
1114-35 - FMT01A
1114-36 - FMT01B
Percent Solids
PH
Lead, mg/kg (WL-220.353)
Lead, mg/kg (WL»405.783)
Cadmium, mg/kg (WL-226.502)
Cadmium, mg/kg (WL-228.802)
Antimony, mg/kg
in^-jj
71.0
3.46
53.6
._
<.86*
<.54
<.21
i 1 1H- J>»
72.5
3.33
32.8
_.
<.74*
<.53
<.21
111H-JO
47.8
4.33
443
__
'<.72*
<.72
I ll»»-OO
76.2
4.17
27.3
..
<.59*
<.49
1
<.29 ! <.20
| ,/ COMMENT . ^1
Analyses conducted In accordance with EPA 600/4-79-020, Methods for Chemical Analysis
of Hater and Hastes. March 1979.
Analyses performed in compliance with procedures specified for the Contract Laboratory
Program.
*0ata not used due to background interference (AL > SOppm).
CERTIFICATION
MANAOf M. CHCMICAULABOHATONV
IHIC'TOR^ANALYTICAL Sf K\ ICES
F-121
recycled paper
truing' Mnd fti\irnnntt*nl
-------
MEMORANDUM
TU: Rick Rudy
FROM: Gary Hahn .^''''
DATE: January 17, 1986
SUBJECT: Sapp Battery Report; Job No. U-2722
CC: Lab File, QA/QC File
Attached is the laboratory report of the analysis conducted on fifteen
samples received at the Analytical Services Center on Decanber 7,
1985. Analysis was performed according to the procedures set forth i,i
"Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods.
"SW-846, Second Edition, U.S. EPA, 1982.
All samples, on which this report is based, will be retained by E&E
for a period of 30 days from the date of this report, unless otherwi ;
instructed by the client. If additional storage of samples is
requested by the client, a storage fee of Sl.OO/sample container per
month will be charged for each sample, with such charges accruing
until destruction of the samples is authorized by the client.
GH/cp
enclosure
F-124
-------
FIXATION STUDY
ANALYTICAL DATA
F-123
paper truing* nml rn* tnmmiMii
-------
ecology and environment, inc.
im*mttion« SovciMfn m tru Envwonm«m
LABORATORY REPORT
FOR
Sapp Battery
Job No.:
Sample Date:
Date Received:
Sample Type:
U-2722
11/20/85
12/7/85
Soil
Sampled By: E & E, Inc.
Delivered By: Federal Expre- s
RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF EXTRACTS FROM EP TOXICITY TESTS
E & E Lab Number
Customer Number
imple Identity
85- 8931G
FSF 03
0.75 ash
0.75 lime
1 soil
8932A
FSF 04
straight
mg/L
8932B
FSF 04
0.5
concrete
1 soil
8932C
FSF 04
1
concrete
1 soil
8932D
FSF 04
1.5
concrete
1 soil
Maximum
Allowable
Concentratioi
(mg/L)
8932F
FSF 0^
0.25 a.,'1
0.25 lii.e
1 soi"
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Lead
Mercury
Selenium
Silver
<0.5
<5.0
<0.1
<0.5
<0.5
<0.02
<0.2
<0.5
<0.5
<5.0
<0.1
<0.5
<0.5
<0.02
<0.2
<0.5
<0.5
<5.0
<0.1
<0.5
<0.5
<0.02
<0.2
<0.5
<0.5
<5.0
<0.1
<0.5
<0.5
<0.02
<0.2
<0.5
<0.5
<5.0
<0.1
<0.5
<0.5
<0.02
<0.2
<0.5
<0.5
<5.0
<0.'.
-------
ecology and environment, inc.
Innnmmul SeMXMtt IK m» E
LABORATORY REPORT
FOR
Sapp Battery
Job No.:
Sample Date:
Date Received:
Sample Type:
U-2722
11/20/35
12/7/85
Soil
Sampled By: E & E, Inc.
Delivered By: Federal Expr-",,
RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF EXTRACTS FROM EP TOXICITY TESTS
E & E Lab Number
ustomer Number
Sample Identity
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Lead
Mercury
Selenium
Si Tver
85- 8931A
FSF 03
straight
<0.5
<5.0
<0.1
<0.5
2.62
' <0.02
<0.2
<0.5
8931B
FSF 03
0.5
concrete
1 soil
<0.5
<5.0
<0.1
<0.5
<0.5
<0.02
<0.2
<0.5
mg/L
8931C
FSF 03
1
8931D
FSF 03
1.5
8931E
FSF 03
0.25 ash
893 !?
FSF 03
0.5 asi,
Maximum
Allowable
Concentratio1
(mg/L)
concrete concrete 0.25 lime 0.5 li.ie
1 soil
1 soil
1 soil
1 so:
<0.5
<5.0
<0.1
<0.5
2.62
<0.02
<0.2
<0.5
<0.5
<5.0
<0.1
<0.5
<0.5
<0.02
<0.2
<0.5
<0.5
<5.0
<0.1
<0.5
<0.5
<0.02
<0.2
<0.5
<0.5
<5.0
<0.1
<0.5
<0.5
<0.02
<0.2
<0.5
<0.5
<5.0
<0.1
<0.5
<0.5
<0.02
<0.2
<0.5
<0/j 5.0
<5.C 100.0
<0.1 1.0
<0.f 5.0
<0.5 5.0
<0.0? 0.2
<0.? 1.0
<0.'> 5.0
Analytical References:
"Test Mel-hods for Evaluating Solid Waste Physical/Chemical Methods",
Second E«-ition, U.S. EPA. 1982
Supervising Analyst
Date:
F-125
JB&
recycled paper
-------
U-2722
QUALITY CONTROL FOfl ACCURACY:
PERCENT DIFFERENCE—EPA QUALITY ASSURANCE MATERIALS
Element
Arsenic
Bariun
Cadmium
Chromium
Le«d
Mercury
Selenium
Silver
Concentrations
Known
26.7
11V, 6UU
1150
6500
8000
8.73
8.73
10.9
6000
in uq/L
Determined
29.4
U3.760
1170
6580
8150
9.10
8.3Z
9.50
6320
Percent
Difference
10.1
3.5
3.5
1.2
18.8
4.2
4.7
12.8
5.3
Notei These results are within the 955 confidence interval for these
parameters.
F-128
-------
ecology and environment, inc.
LABORATORY REPORT
FOR
Sapp Battery
Job No.:
Sample Date:
Date Received:
Sample Type:
U-2722
11/20/85
12/7/85
Soil
Sampled By: E & E, Inc.
Delivered By: Federal Exprpis
RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF EXTRACTS FROM EP TOXICITY TEST?.
E 4 E Lab Number
Customer Number
ample Identity
85-
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Lead
Mercury
Selenium
Silver
mg/L
8932F
FSF 04
0.5 ash
0.5 lime
1 soil
<0.5
<5.0
<0.5
<0.5
<0.02
<0.2
<0.5
89326
FSF 04
0.75 ash
0.75 lime
1 soil
<0.5
<5.0
<0.5
<0.5
<0.02
<0.2
<0.5
Maximum
Al lowable
Concentration
IJC.O
l .0
-i.O
1..0
.1.2
1.0
f.O
Analytical References:
"Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste Physical/Chemical Methods", SW-8't?
Second Edition, U.S. EPA, 1982
rtevci«J gtotr
Supervising Analyst
Date:
F-127
recycled paper
and
-------
61
! ecology and environment, inr.
n1«>r»!KXUl SOKKlnll'" tfw Environment
LABORATORY REPORT
FOR
Sapp Bettery
Job No.: U-2933
Sample Date: 12/20/85
Date Received: 2/18/86
Sample Type: Water
E & E Lab Number 8$-
Customer Number
Aluminum
Anti-iony
Arsenic
Cadmium
Lead
Manganese
Selenium
RE: FM-2130
Sampled By: E i E, Inc.
Delivered By: Federal Express
1053
FNW-9B
Res ample
132
<0.06
<0.005
0.003
0.045
0.048
<0.005
1054
FNW-12A
Resample
results
0.725
<0.06
<0.005
0.003
0.123
0.006
<0.005
1055
Alford
Fire
House
in mg/L
<0.10
<0.06
<0.005
<0.001
0.013
0.032
<0.005
Prep
Blank
<0.10
<0.06
<0.005
<0.001
<0.005
<0.f)QK.
<0.00f'
Analytical References;
"Methods for the Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes", EPA-600/4-79-:20,
March 1983.
1L
Supervising Analyst X'"-(
Date: ' ' ''-' 'v') '•'•
F-130
-------
MEMORANDUM
TO: Rick Rudy
FROM: Gary Hahn .M //-'/'>
DATE: March 4, 1986
SUBJECT: Sapp Battery Report; Job No. U-2933
CC: Lab File, QA/QC File
Attached is the laboratory report of the analysis conducted on thre.-
samples received at the Analytical Services Center on February 18,
1986. Analysis was performed according to the procedures set forth it
"Methods for the Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes",
EPA-600/4-79-020, March 1983.
All samples, on which this report is based, will be retained by E & ,
for a period of 30 days from the date of this report, unless otherwi?
ins'ructed by the client. If additional storage of samples is
requested by the client, a storage fee of Sl.OO/sample container per
month will be charged for each sample, with such charges accruing
until destruction of the samples is authorized by the client.
GH/cp
enclosure
F-129
recycled pap6f i-« tili*^* ami rmirurmir*ni
-------
'1-2933
QUALITY CONTROL FOR ACCURACY: PERCENT RECOVERY
FOR SPIKED WATER SAMPLES
Element
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Cadmium
Le»d
Manganese
Selenium
E & E
Laboratory
No. 86-
1055R
1054R
1054R
1054R
1055R
1055R
1054R
Original
Value
<100
<60
<5.0
3.3
6.1
36
<5.0
Amount
Added
(ug/L)
2000
120
25
2.5
25
200
25
Amount
Determined
1992
120
25
5.65
30.8
231
28.8
Pe cent
n jrovery
•>6
100
!00
•V.
>•)
*
115
F-132
-------
U-2933
QUALITY CONTROL FOR ACCURACY»
PERCENT DIFFERENCE—EPA QUALITY ASSURANCE MATERIALS
Element
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
CxJmium
Leed
Manganese
Selenium
Concentrations
Known
729
101
26.7
3.30
42.7
346
10.9
in uq/L
Determined
753
106
30.4
3.37
41.9
366
10.2
Percent
01 f Terence
3.3
6.9
14
2.1
1.9
5.2
6.4
Notei These results are within the 955 confidence interval for these
parameters.
F-131
recycled paper ,(.,,,.lfv „„,, rmir,inmrm
-------
MEMORANDUM
TO: Rick Rudy
FROM: Gary Hahn
DATE: March 6, 1986
SUB.:£CT: Sapp Battery Report; Job U-2940
CC: Lab File, QA/QC File, P. Brodzik
Attached is the laboratory report of the analysis conducted on one
sample received at the Analytical Services Center on February 19,
1986. Analysis was performed according to the procedures set forth '.
"isst Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods,
"S.V 846, Second Edition, U.S. EPA, 1982.
This composite sample will be used for the fixation study. The
leachate from the EP Toxicity test on the "fixed" samples will be
analyzed for lead only.
All samples, on which this report is based, will be retained by E & i-
for a period of 30 days from the date of this report, unless otherwise
instructed by the client. If additional storage of samples is
reqi.asted by the client, a storage fee of Sl.OO/sample container per
month will be charged for each sample, with such charges accruing
until destruction of the samples is authorized by the client.
Gh/cp
enclosure
F-134
-------
QUALITY CONTROL FOR PRECISION
RESULTS OF ANALYSIS OF REPLICATE
ANALYSES OF WATER SAMPLES
U-2933
Element
Aluminum
,vntimony
Arsenic
Cadmium
Lead
Manganeee
Selenium
E A E
Laboratory
No. 86-
1055
1054
1054
1054
1055
1055
1054
Original
Analysis
<0.10
<0.06
<0.005
0.003
0.013
0.032
<0.005
Replicate
Analysis
<0.10
<0.06
<0.005
0.003
0.006
0.036
<0.005
Relative
Percent
Difference
RPO
~
—
—
0
74
12
—
F-133
recycled paper
t*r*il«iK\ ami rtmrmmtrm
-------
QUALITY CONTROL FOR PRECISION
RESULTS OF ANALYSIS OF REPLICATE
ANALYSES OF E.P. TOXICITY EXTRACTS
U-2940
Element
E & E
Laboratory
No. 86-
Onginal
Analysis
Replicate
Analysis
Relative
Percent
Difference
RPO
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Lead
Selenium
Silver
1126
1126
1126
1126
1126
1126
1126
<0.5
<5.0
<0.1
<0.5
59.4
<0.5
<0.5
<5.0
<0.1
<0.5
51.8
<0.5
F-136
-------
ecology and environment, inc.
LABORATORY REPORT
FOR
Sapp Battery
Job No.: U-2940
Date Received: 2/19/86
Sarrple Type: Soil Comp.
Sampled By: E & E, Inc.
RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF EXTRACTS FROM EP TOXICITY TEST'
mq/L
E ! E Lab Number 86-
Customer Number
1126
FSG-53A 75A 87A
538 766 878
53C 76C 87C
Prep
Blank
Maximum
Alh.vable
Concer ration
Sample Identity
Arsenic
Barium
Caomium
Chromium
Lead
Mercury
Selenium
Silver
<0.5
<5.0
<0.1
<0.5
59.4
<0.02
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<5.0
<0.1
<0.5
<0.5
<0.02
<0.5
<0.5
5..)
loo.:
i •.
S.i.
5.u
Q.I
1..,'
5 1
Analytical References:
"Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste Physical/Chemical Methods", SW-846
Second Edition, U.S. EPA, 1982
Supervising Analyst .-
t»rycl<«1 p»(W«t
Date:
F-135
recycled paper
anil fnvinmmrtit
------- |