&EPA
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Solid Waste And
Emergency Response
(5201 G)
EPA/540/R-95/102
PB95-962934
9200.5-732C
May 1995
SUPERFUND:
Progress at
National
Priority
List Sites
NEW YORK
1995 UP DATE
Printed on Recycled Paper
-------
How to Use the NPL Book
The site fact sheets presented in this book
are comprehensive summaries that cover a
broad range of information. The fact sheets
describe hazardous waste sites on the NPL and
their locations, as well as the conditions
leading to their listing ("Site Description").
The summaries list the types of contaminants
that have been discovered and related threats
to public and ecological health ("Threats and
Contaminants"). "Cleanup Approach" pres-
ents an overview of the cleanup activities
completed, underway, or planned. The fact
sheets conclude with a brief synopsis of how
much progress has been made in protecting
public health and the environment. The
summaries also pinpoint other actions, such as
legal efforts to involve polluters responsible
for site contamination and community con-
cerns.
The fact sheets are arranged in alphabetical
order by site name. Because site cleanup is a
dynamic and gradual process, all site informa-
tion is accurate as of the date shown on the
bottom of each page. Progress is always being
made at NPL sites, and the EPA periodically
will update the site fact sheets to reflect recent
actions. The following two pages show a
generic fact sheet and briefly describe the
information under each section.
How Can You Use
This State Book?
You can use this book to keep informed
about the sites that concern you, particu-
larly ones close to home. The EPA is commit-
ted to involving the public in the decision
making process associated with hazardous
waste cleanup. The Agency solicits input from
area residents in communities affected by
Superfund sites. Citizens are likely to be
affected not only by hazardous site conditions,
but also by the remedies that combat them.
Site cleanups take many forms and can affect
communities in different ways. Local traffic
may be rerouted, residents may be relocated,
temporary water supplies may be necessary.
Definitive information on a site can help
citizens sift through alternatives and make
decisions. To make good choices, you must
know what the threats are and how the EPA
intends to clean up the site. You must under-
stand the cleanup alternatives being proposed
for site cleanup and how residents may be
affected by each one. You also need to have
some idea of how your community intends to
use the site in the future, and you need to know
what the community can realistically expect
once the cleanup is complete.
The EPA wants to develop cleanup methods
that meet community needs, but the Agency
only can take local concerns into account if it
understands what they are. Information must
travel both ways in order for cleanups to be
effective and satisfactory. Please take this
opportunity to learn more, become involved,
and assure that hazardous waste cleanup at
"your" site considers your community's
concerns.
-------
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Provides the dates when the
site was Proposed, made Final,
and Deleted from the NPL.
SITE RESPONSIBILITY
Identifies the Federal, State,
and/or potentially responsible
parties taking responsibility
for cleanup actions at the site.
ENVIRONMENTAL
PROGRESS
Summarizes the actions to
reduce the threats to nearby
residents and the surrounding
environment and the progress
towards cleaning up the site.
SITE NAME
STATE
EPA ID# ABCOOOOOOO
Site Description
EPA REGION XX
COUNTY NAME
LOCATION
Other Names:
: XXX XXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX :
: xxxxxxxxxx xxxx xxxxxxxx xxxx xx xxxxxxxxx xx xxxxxx xxxxxxxx \
xxxxxxxxxXSn^xxxx xxx xxxxxxxxxxxxx xx xxxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx x xxx ;
XXXXXXX XXX XXXXXM*4tXXXXX XXXXX XXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXXXXXXXX :
xxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxx""Jems3^ix^xxx xx xxxxxxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxxxx xxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxx xxxx xxxjOBsmxxxxx xxxxxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxx xxx xxxxxx
XXXXXXXXXXXX XX XXXXXXX XXX XXXXX JoSftlK^JCXX XXXXXX XX XXXX XXX XXXXX XXX XXXXX XXX XXXXX
Site Responsibility:
xxxxxx xxx xxxxx :
XXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX
NPL Listing History
Proposed XX/XX/XX
Final XX/XX/XX
Threats and Contaminants
xxxxxx xxx xxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxx
XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XX
XXXXXXXX XXX XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXX XXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX XX XXXXXX XXXX
XXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXX XXXXXX XXXXXX XXXXX XXXXXX
XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXX X XXX XX
XXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXX
Cleanup Approach
XXXXXX XXX XXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XX XXXXXXXXX XX XXXXXX XXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXX XXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX XX XXXXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXX X XXX XXXXXXXX
Response Action Status
XXXXXX XXX XXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX :
XXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XX XXXXXXXXX XX !
XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXX XXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX XX XXXXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXX X :
xxxxxxxx xxxxxxx xxx yxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxxxx xxxxxxxx :
XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXX X XXX XX XXXXXXXXX XXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXX
XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXX XXXX XXXXX XXX
XXX XXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX XX XXXXXXX XXX XXXXXX XX XXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXX :
Site Facts:
XXXXXX XXX XXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XX XXXXXXXXX XX
XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXX XXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX XX XXXXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXX X XXX
^^(XXXXXX XXX XXXXXX
Environmental Progress
XXXXXX XXX XXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XX XXXXXXXXX XX XXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXX
XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXX XXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX XX XXXXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXX X XXX XXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXX XXXXXX XXXXXX XXX XXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX
Site Repository
XXXXXX XXX XXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX
SITE REPOSITORY
Lists the location of the primary site repository. The site
repository may include community relations plans, public
meeting announcements and minutes, fact sheets, press
releases, and other site-related documents.
-------
SITE DESCRIPTION
This section describes the location and history of the site. It includes descrip-
tions of the most recent activities and past actions at the site that have con-
tributed to the contamination. Population estimates, land usages, and nearby
resources give readers background on the local setting surrounding the site.
THREATS AND CONTAMINANTS
The major chemical categories of site contamination are noted, as well as
which environmental resources are affected. Icons representing each of the
affected resources (may include air, groundwater, surface water, soil, and
contamination to environmentally sensitive areas) are included in the margins
of this section. Potential threats to residents and the surrounding environ-
ments arising from the site contamination also are described.
CLEANUP APPROACH
This section contains a brief overview of how the site is being cleaned up.
RESPONSE ACTION STATUS
Specific actions that have been accomplished or will be undertaken to clean
up the site are described here. Cleanup activities at NPL sites are divided
into separate phases, depending on the complexity and required actions at the
site. Two major types of cleanup activities often are described: initial,
immediate, or emergency actions to quickly remove or reduce imminent
threats to the community and surrounding areas; and long-term remedial
phases directed at final cleanup at the site. Each stage of the cleanup strategy
is presented in this section of the summary. Icons representing the stage of
the cleanup process (initial actions, site investigations, EPA selection of the
cleanup remedy, engineering design phase, cleanup activities underway, and
completed cleanup) are located in the margin next to each activity descrip-
tion.
SITE FACTS
Additional information on activities and events at the site are included in this
section. Often details on legal or administrative actions taken by the EPA to
achieve site cleanup or other facts pertaining to community involvement with
the site cleanup process are reported here.
-------
Guide to the NPL Book Icons
The "icons," or symbols, accompanying the text allow the reader to see at a glance which envi-
ronmental resources are affected and the status of cleanup activities at the site.
Icons in the Threats
and Contaminants
Section
Icons in the Response
Action Status Section
Contaminated Groundwater re-
sources in the vicinity or underlying
the site. (Groundwater is often used
as a drinking water source.)
Contaminated Surface Water and
Sediments on or near the site.
(These include lakes, ponds,
streams, and rivers.)
Contaminated Air in the vicinity of
the site. (Air pollution usually is
periodic and involves contaminated
dust particles or hazardous gas
emissions.)
Contaminated Soil and Sludges on
or near the site. (This contamination
category may include bulk or other
surface hazardous wastes found on
the site.)
Threatened or contaminated Envi-
ronmentally Sensitive Areas in the
vicinity of the site. (Examples
include wetlands and coastal areas
or critical habitats.)
Initial, Immediate, or Emergency
Actions have been taken or are
underway to eliminate immediate
threats at the site.
Site Studies at the site to determine
the nature and extent of contamina-
tion are planned or underway.
Remedy Selected indicates that site
investigations have been concluded,
and the EPA has selected a final
cleanup remedy for the site or part
of the site.
Remedy Design means that engi-
neers are preparing specifications
and drawings for the selected
cleanup technologies.
Cleanup Ongoing indicates that the
selected cleanup remedies for the
contaminated site, or part of the site,
currently are underway.
Cleanup Complete shows that all
cleanup goals have been achieved
for the contaminated site or part of
the site.
-------
EPA ID
Number Site Name
NYD072366453 ACTION ANODIZING, PLATING, & POLISHING
NYD002066330 AMERICAN THERMOSTAT CO.
NYD001485226 ANCHOR CHEMICALS
NYD980535652 APPLIED ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
NYD980507693 BATAVIA LANDFILL
NYD980768675 BEC (BINGHAMPTON EQUIPMENT CO.) TRUCKING
NYD980768683 BIOCLINICAL LABORATORIES, INC.
NYD980652275 BREWSTER WELL FIELD
NY7890008975 BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LABORATORY (USDOE)
NYD980780670 BYRON BARREL & DRUM
NYD981 561 954 C & J DISPOSAL LEASING CO. DUMP
NYD010968014 CARROL & DUBIES SEWAGE DISPOSAL
NYD981184229 CIRCUITRON CORP.
NYD002044584 CLAREMONT POLYCHEMICAL
NYD000511576 CLOTHIER DISPOSAL
NYD980768691 COLESVILLE MUNICIPAL LANDFILL
NYD981486947 CONKLIN DUMPS
NYD980528475 CORTESE LANDFILL
NYD980780746 ENDICOTT VILLAGE WELL FIELD
NYD073675514 FACET ENTERPRISES, INC.
NYD000511857 FMC CORP. (DUBLIN ROAD LANDFILL)
NYD981 560923 FOREST GLEN MOBILE HOME SUBDIVISION
NYD980593099 FULTON TERMINALS
NYD981566417 GCL TIE & TREATING INC.
NYD980528335 GE MOREAU
NYD091972554 GENERAL MOTORS (CENTRAL FOUNDRY DIVISION)
NYD002050110 GENZALE PLATING CO.
NYD980768717 GOLDISC RECORDINGS, INC.
NY4571924451 GRIFFISS AIR FORCE BASE
NYD980785661 HAVILAND COMPLEX
NYD980780779 HERTEL LANDFILL
NYD980506810 HOOKER (102ND STREET)
NYD000831644 HOOKER (HYDE PARK)
NYD980651087 HOOKER (S AREA)
NYD002920312 HOOKER CHEMICAL/RUCO POLYMER CORP
NYD980763841 HUDSON RIVER PCBS
NYD980506901 ISLIP MUNICIPAL SANITARY LANDFILL
NYD980506927 JOHNSTOWN CITY LANDFILL
NYD000813428 JONES CHEMICALS, INC.
NYD980534556 JONES SANITATION
NYD980780795 KATONAH MUNICIPAL WELL
NYD075784165 KENMARK TEXTILE CORP.
NYD980650667 KENTUCKY AVENUE WELL FIELD
NYD986882660 LI TUNGSTEN CORP.
NYD000337295 LIBERTY INDUSTRIAL FINISHING
NYD000606947 LOVE CANAL
NYD013468939 LUDLOW SAND & GRAVEL
NYD980535124 MALTA ROCKET FUEL AREA
NYD010959757 MARATHON BATTERY CORP.
NYD000512459 MATTIACE PETROCHEMICAL CO., INC.
-------
EPA ID
Number Site Name
NYD048148175 MERCURY REFINING, INC.
NYD000511451 NEPERA CHEMICAL CO., INC.
NYD000514257 NIAGARA COUNTY REFUSE
NYD980664361 NIAGARA MOHAWK /POWER CO (SARATOGA SPRINGS)
NYD980762520 NORTH SEA MUNICIPAL LANDFILL
NYD980531727 OLD BETHPAGE LANDFILL
NYD980528657 OLEAN WELL FIELD
NYD986913580 ONONDAGA LAKE
NYD991292004 PASLEY SOLVENTS & CHEMICALS, INC.
NYD980507495 PFOHL BROTHERS LANDFILL
NY4571 924774 PLATTSBURGH AIR FORCE BASE
NYD000511659 POLLUTION ABATEMENT SERVICES
NYD980654206 PORT WASHINGTON LANDFILL
NYD980768774 PREFERRED PLATING CORP.
NYD001 667872 RADIUM CHEMICAL CO., INC.
NYD000511493 RAMAPO LANDFILL
NYD980507735 RICHARDSON HILL ROAD LANDFILL/POND
NYD002232957 ROBINTECH, INC./NATIONAL PIPE CO.
NYD982272734 ROSEN BROTHERS SCRAP YARD/DUMP
NYD981486954 ROWE INDUSTRIES GROUND WATER CONTAMINATION
NYD980535165 SARNEY FARM
NYD980535181 SEALAND RESTORATION, INC.
NY0213820830 SENECA ARMY DEPOT
NYD980507677 SIDNEY LANDFILL
NYD980535215 SINCLAIR REFINERY
NYD001533165 SMS INSTRUMENTS, INC.
NYD980421176 SOLVENT SAVERS
NYD980780878 SUFFERN VILLAGE WELLFIELD
NYD000511360 SYOSSET LANDFILL
NYD980509285 TRI-CITIES BARREL CO., INC.
NYD002059517 TRONIC PLATING CO., INC.
NYD980763767 VESTAL WATER SUPPLY WELL 1-1
NYD980652267 VESTAL WATER SUPPLY WELL 4-2
NYD980509376 VOLNEY MUNICIPAL LANDFILL
NYD980506679 WARWICK LANDFILL
NYD980652259 WIDE BEACH DEVELOPMENT
NYD000511733 YORK OIL CO.
-------
ACTION ANODI
PLATING, AND
POLISHING CO
NEW YORK
EPA ID# NYD072366453
REGION 2
Suffolk County
1 mile east of the
Nassau/Suffolk Co. line
Site Description
Action Anodizing, Plating, and Polishing Corp. (AAPP) is a 1-acre site located at 33 Dixon
Avenue in a residential area of Copiague, New York. For approximately thirty years prior to
1968, a commercial laundry facility operated on the site's premises. Since 1968, AAPP has
operated on the site. AAPP's operations primarily involve sulfuric acid anodizing of aluminum
parts for the electronics industry, cadmium plating, chromate conversion coatings, metal dyeing
and vapor degreasing. During a site inspection in January 1980 by the Suffolk County
Department of Health Services, it was discovered that rinse water from AAPP's operations was
discharging directly into underground leaching pits that had previously been used by the
commercial laundry facility. Under the direction and approval of the Suffolk County Department
of Health Services, the shop excavated the leaching pools and backfilled them with clean sand
and gravel. AAPP expanded its building over the location of the former leaching pits in 1985.
Two schools and a hospital are located within a mile of the site, and nine other schools are
located within 5,900 feet. Public supply wells are the sole source of drinking water in the area
and approximately 1 million residents of Suffolk and Nassau Counties obtain drinking water from
public wells within 3 miles of the site. Amityville Creek, a small tributary to the Great South
Bay, is 1/2 mile southeast of the facility. The upper reach of the creek is designated as a
freshwater wetland.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 06/24/88
Final Date: 03/31/89
Threats and Contaminants
In 1980, Suffolk County Department of Health Services sampled the sediment of the
on-site leaching pool system and found high levels of heavy metals, including
chromium, cadmium, iron and zinc in the samples. In addition, elevated levels of
chromium and cadmium were detected in the surface soil samples taken by the County
in 1980. In the area of the former leaching pool system, the water table is
approximately 14 feet below surface level.
November 1994
-------
Cleanup Approach
Response Action Status
Entire Site: In 1989, the EPA began an intensive study of pollution problems at and
around the AAPP property. The investigation, completed in 1992, explored the nature
and extent of contamination at the site and included sampling of groundwater, surface
soils and subsurface soils for metals and organic compounds. The results of the study indicated
that the site does not pose any unacceptable risks to human health or the environment. The EPA,
therefore, selected "no action" as the remedy for the site.
Environmental Progress
The EPA is currently reviewing the site to ensure that the "no action" remedy remains protective
of human health and the environment.
November 1994
ACTION ANODIZING, PLATING,
AND POLISHING CORP.
-------
AMERICAN /~""~"~^ h EPA REGION 2
/ < • ^pf Greene County
THERMOSTA"1^1* ~ ^^ South Cairo
NEW YORK
EPA ID# NYD002066330
Site Description
From 1954 to 1985, American Thermostat Co. built thermostats for small appliances at this
8-acre site in South Cairo. Located in the Catskill Creek Valley, the site and much of the nearby
community are bordered by Routes 23 and 23B. The company was the only manufacturer hi the
vicinity, which is a popular tourist and residential area. In 1981, the New York State Department
of Environmental Conservation discovered that American Thermostat Co. employees were
improperly disposing of chemicals at the site. The State learned that workers had been pouring
waste organic solvents down drams attached to an abandoned septic system for a number of
years. Solvents and sludges also Ijad been dumped on the parking lot. State health personnel
tested wells in the vicinity of the site hi the spring of 1981 and found six to be contaminated with
trichloroethylene (TCE) and other volatile organic compounds (VOCs) including
tetrachloroethylene (PCE). The State health department advised affected residents not to drink or
cook with then- well water. By late 1982, the American Thermostat Co. had installed carbon
filters on its own well and on those of four affected homes. The home located next to the plant
was hooked up to the company's water supply. The company ceased operations in 1985 and filed
involuntary bankruptcy without completely fulfilling an agreement with the State to conduct site
cleanup. Approximately 5,000 people live within a 3-mile radius of the site, primarily in
low-density residential areas. All homes within 1/2 mile of the site use private wells. Catskill
Creek, less than 1/4 mile east of the site, is classified as a trout stream and has considerable
recreational value to local and visiting fishermen.
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through
Federal and State actions.
Final Date. 09/08/83
Threats and Contaminants
Groundwater and drinking water in the site vicinity are contaminated with VOCs,
including PCE and TCE. An estimated 26,000 square feet of soil at the site are
contaminated with TCE and PCE to a depth of approximately 1 feet. In the early
1980s, TCE and PCE were detected in two tributaries to Catskill Creek, but the creek
itself showed no contamination. Adverse public health effects may occur from
ingesting or coming in direct contact with contaminated groundwater, soil, or
materials inside the building.
November 1994
-------
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in three stages: immediate actions and two long-term remedial phases
focusing on provision of a new water supply and cleanup of the entire site.
Response Action Status
Immediate Actions: Under State orders, the owners agreed to clean up the site and
its surroundings; to provide, monitor, and maintain carbon filtration systems for five
affected wells; and to supply bottled water for consumption by the affected residents.
However, when the company went out of business in May 1985, it stopped providing bottled
water and abandoned the maintenance of carbon filtration systems at the affected homes. The
State requested that the EPA sample other drinking wells near the site; provide bottled water and
carbon filtration systems where necessary; and take over the maintenance of the water treatment
systems at the originally affected homes. In addition to these actions, the EPA installed three air
stripping systems at the site. The stripping systems have treated over 10 million gallons of
contaminated groundwater to date. A system of seven extraction and reinjection wells and a soil
vacuum extraction system were installed at the site in 1989 for the purpose of accelerating the
treatment of the groundwater.
Water Supply: In early 1988, the EPA selected a remedy that would assure a clean
water supply to residents near the site. It includes extending the existing Catskill
water district pipeline to the affected and potentially affected areas. The EPA
completed the engineering design for this remedy in 1991. Construction of the water pipeline
began in the fall of 1991, and was completed in late 1992.
Entire Site: The EPA completed an intensive study of the sources of site
contamination in 1990. Based on the results of this investigation, the EPA selected
actions to clean up the site including low-temperature treatment of the contaminated
soil, air stripping and carbon adsorption for treatment of the groundwater and surface water, and
decontamination of the building located on the site. The engineering designs for cleanup of the
building, soil, and groundwater have all been completed. Decontamination of the building was
completed in late 1992. Treatment of the contaminated soil is scheduled for completion in early
1995; treatment of the groundwater is expected to be complete in 1996.
November 1994 2 AMERICAN THERMOSTAT CO.
-------
Environmental Progress
By treating contaminated groundwater and soil with on-site air stripping systems and vacuum
extraction systems, and extending the water supply pipeline to the affected area, the EPA has
reduced the potential for exposure to site contaminants while final cleanup actions are being
completed.
Site Repository
Catskill Town Office, 439 Main Street, Catskill, NY 12414
AMERICAN THERMOSTAT CO.
November 1994
-------
ANCHOR CHEMI
NEW YORK
EPA ID# NYD001485226
EPA REGION 2
Nassau County
Hicksville, near Cantiaque Park
Site Description
Anchor Chemicals, later known as Anchor-Lith Kem Ko, operated on this 1 1/2-acre site in
Hicksville from 1964 to 1984. The company blended and packed chemicals for the graphic arts
industry. A construction company is now using the building as a warehouse. While Anchor
Chemicals was in business, workers stored chemicals above and below the ground; 17
underground storage tanks ranging in capacity from 550 to 4,000 gallons lie beneath the concrete
floor of the building. Between mid-1981 and early 1983, six leaking underground tanks were
taken out of service. The company installed three monitoring wells in 1982. These revealed that
subsurface soil and ground water were contaminated with chlorinated organics. From 1982 to
1987, the party potentially responsible for the site contamination conducted ground water
monitoring. Contamination appears to be limited to the subsurface environment. The area
surrounding the site is residential, and the Cantiaque Park and golf course are located 100 yards
north of the site. Approximately 90,000 people within 3 miles of the site draw their drinking
water from municipal and private wells. Groundwater also is used for irrigation and industrial
processes. Approximately 12,000 people live within a mile of the facility; 11 schools are situated
within 11/2 miles.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal and potentially responsible
parties' actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 10/15/84
Final Date: 06/10/86
Threats and Contaminants
Groundwater and subsurface soils on site are contaminated with volatile organic
compounds (VOCs). The only likely route of exposure to contaminants is through the
contaminated groundwater. Public water is available to everyone in the area.
Contaminated groundwater is a potential threat to the water supply wells of the
Westbury, Hicksville, and Bowling Green water districts, which are all located less
than 6,500 feet southwest of the site.
November 1994
-------
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in two phases: an immediate action and a long-term remedial phase
focusing on cleanup of the entire site.
Response Action Status
Immediate Action: Anchor Chemicals was fenced to prevent trespassers from
accessing the site and being exposed to hazardous wastes.
Entire Site: The party potentially responsible for contamination at the site signed an
Administrative Order on Consent to perform a study of the site in June 1989. This
investigation, which began later in 1989, is mapping out the nature and extent of the
contamination and will recommend the best strategies for final cleanup. The investigation is
scheduled for completion in 1995.
Site Facts: An Administrative Order on Consent, issued by the EPA, was signed by Anchor
Chemicals in mid-1989, requiring them to conduct investigations of contamination at the site.
Environmental Progress
After adding the Anchor Chemicals site to the NPL, the EPA determined, after an initial
evaluation, that the site does not currently pose an immediate threat to the surrounding
community or the environment while investigations leading to the selection of a final cleanup
remedy are taking place.
Site Repository
Hicksville Public Library, 169 Jersusalem Avenue, Hicksville, NY 11801
November 1994 2 ANCHOR CHEMICALS
-------
APPLIED |^T Yra EPAREGION2
I \ \ rJ-A Nassau County
ENVIRONMENTAL^ YvA GlenwoodLand^
NEW YORK
EPA ID# NYD980535652
Site Description
OCDX/IOCC J^ssx^PPr^l Other Names:
O t R V IU t O ^H-^W^tM?^-/ Philips Petroleum Co.
Applied Environmental Services recovered fuels from hazardous wastes at this 4-acre site in
Glenwood Landing from 1980 to 1983. The property contains two 1-story buildings, seven
underground tanks, and 11 aboveground tanks, seven of which are 15 feet above-grade on an
earthen wall. Although all the liquid chemicals stored in the tanks have been removed from the
site, spills, leaks, or other activities have left on-site soil, groundwater, and surface waters
contaminated. The current owner of the site, Shore Realty, purchased the property in 1983 and
evicted Applied Environmental Services in January 1984. The site has been inactive since; it is
fenced and access is controlled. Before 1980, the site was leased and operated by a petrochemical
company. Several spills occurred during its tenure, including about 3,000 gallons of the volatile
organic compound (VOC) toluene from an overturned tank trailer. The site is on the north shore
of Long Island; it slopes down to Hempstead Harbor on the west and Mott Cove on the south. A
fuel oil distributor, power plant, and public boat landing lie to the north, and there is a private
yacht club to the east. During past site inspections, the State and the EPA observed leaking
barrels, tanks of solvents, and an oil sheen in Mott Cove. In 1985 and 1988, leachate was
discharging into Hempstead Harbor from the bulkhead. Approximately 7,600 people live within a
mile of the site. Homes lie 500 feet to the south, 800 feet to the north, and 1,500 feet to the west
of the site. An estimated 20,000 people within 3 miles of the site use groundwater as a drinking
water source. There are three public water supplies in the area, all of which are being monitored
and are free of site-related contaminants.
_. _ ...... _, . . . , . .. . , . NPL LISTING HISTORY
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through proposed Date: 10/15/84
Final Date: 06/10/86
Federal, State, and potentially
responsible parties' actions.
Threats and Contaminants
On-site monitoring wells revealed groundwater contamination from VOCs including
xylene and toluene. Sediments are contaminated with polychlorinated biphenyls
(PCBs) and VOCs. On-site soils also are contaminated with VOCs. People on site
could be exposed to contaminants by accidentally ingesting soils or drinking
contaminated groundwater. If chemicals move off site, users of the surrounding
properties and the fishing and swimming areas could be threatened.
November 1994
-------
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in two stages: immediate actions and a long-term remedial phase
directed at cleanup of the entire site.
Response Action Status
Immediate Actions: After toluene began seeping into Hempstead Harbor, Applied
Environmental Services installed a trench that recovers an average of 500 gallons of
organic chemicals each month. The current site owner removed some of the drums
from the site in 1984 and funded the further removal of 218 drums in 1985; the State supervised
these activities. In October 1985, the State began to remove about 600,000 gallons of wastes
from the on-site tanks. The work was completed a year later.
Entire Site: In 1987, under State supervision, the current owner began an intensive
study of pollution at the site. In 1991, a remedy for cleanup was selected, which
included soil vapor extraction for the unsaturated contaminated soils and groundwater
pump and treat, with bioremediation for the groundwater. The engineering design for the
cleanup was completed in early 1994. Construction of the remedy has begun and is expected to
be completed in 1997.
Site Facts: An Administrative Consent Order was signed in October 1987 for the current site
owner to conduct a study into the nature and extent of contamination .at the site. A Consent
Judgement for design and construction of the selected remedy was signed and became effective
on August 5, 1992.
Environmental Progress
The drum removal activities, fencing, and liquid waste collection efforts have reduced the
potential for exposure to hazardous materials at the Applied Environmental Services site while
final cleanup activities are ongoing.
November 1994 2 APPLIED ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
-------
BATAVIA
LANDFILL
NEW YORK
EPA ID# NYD980507693
EPA REGION 2
Genesee County
Near Batavia
Site Description
From the 1960s until 1980, several operations dumped industrial wastes at the 35-acre Batavia
Landfill, which is now inactive. Drummed and undrummed wastes disposed of at the site include
heavy metal sludges, oils, and organic solvents. The Galloway Swamp, a protected wetland,
borders the site on the north and east. Liquids have been seen seeping from the landfill into the
swamp, which now contains heavy metals. Residential wells to the immediate south of the site are
threatened by contaminants emanating from the landfill. The groundwater is the only source of
drinking water for these residents. The surrounding area is rural; 200 people live within a 1-mile
radius of the site. The underlying aquifer supplies drinking water to approximately 6,500 people
living within a 3-mile radius of the site. A total of 1,000 private and public wells serve the
population within 3 miles of the site.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal and potentially responsible
parties' actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 10/23/81
Final Date: 09/08/83
Threats and Contaminants
On-site groundwater is contaminated with lead and other metals, phenols, and volatile
organic compounds (VOCs). Samples taken from nearby residential wells show
elevated iron and VOC levels in the drinking water supply. Sediment and surface
water samples from the Galloway Swamp contain the heavy metals barium and lead.
Drinking contaminated groundwater may pose a threat to human health. Wildlife that
inhabit the swamp also may suffer ill effects from surface water contamination.
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in three phases: immediate actions and two long-term remedial
phases focusing on cleanup of the water supply and the entire site.
November 1994
-------
Response Action Status
Immediate Actions: In the summer of 1990, EPA signed an Administrative Order
on Consent with six potentially responsible parties to remove surface drums and
visibly contaminated soils from the Batavia Landfill Site. In the Summer of 1991,
850 drums, some containing chemical wastes, were removed from the landfill.
Water Supply: A residential well survey conducted by the New York State
Department of Health (NYSDOH) in the fall of 1991 revealed the presence of site-
contaminants in nearby residential wells. In early 1993, EPA selected a remedy
entailing the provision of municipal water to the affected residents. An Administrative Order was
signed in the fall of 1993 requiring seven potentially responsible parties to extend the local
municipal water supply system to the residents living adjacent to the site whose drinking water
supply is threatened by contaminants from the landfill. The design for the remedy is scheduled
for completion in late 1994.
Entire Site: In the summer of 1984, NL Industries, Inc. began conducting an
extensive investigation of the site to determine the nature and extent of the
contamination to the soils, sediment, surface water and groundwater. A feasibility
study to evaluate alternatives for cleaning up the landfill is currently underway. EPA expects to
select a remedy in late 1994.
Site Facts On August 9, 1984, NL Industries, Inc., one of the potentially responsible parties,
and EPA entered into an Administrative Order on Consent to conduct an extensive site study to
determine the nature and extent of contamination to the soils, sediment, surface water, and
groundwater. Six additional potentially responsible parties signed an Administrative Order on
Consent on July 31, 1990 to remove surface drums and contaminated soils from the site.
Environmental Progress
The removal of the drums and contaminated soils has reduced the risks of direct exposure to
hazardous substances. The extension of the municipal water supply system to nearby residents
will eliminate the potential threat posed by the groundwater while final cleanup activities are
being planned at the Batavia Landfill site.
November 1 994
BATAVIA LANDFILL
-------
BEG TRUCKIN
NEW YORK
EPA ID# NYD980768675,
EPA REGION 2
Broome County
Vestal
Site Description
This 3V2-acre site on Stewart Road in Vestal was used by EEC Trucking for truck body
manufacturing. The area around the site is primarily commercial and industrial. It is bordered
by Stewart Road to the south, industrial properties to the east and north, and the Stewart Trailer
Park and wetlands to the west. Prior to the mid-1960s, the site itself was unimproved marshland.
The company that was to become EEC Trucking filled the marshland with various materials,
including fly ash from a local power company, to raise the ground level. Truck body fabrication,
painting, and vehicle maintenance operations generated hazardous wastes. The operators stored
these materials on site. In 1982, alerted by municipal officials, the New York State Department
of Environmental Conservation found about 50 improperly stored drums. The drums contained
waste motor oil, metal cutting oil, paint thinners, solvents, methanol, toluene, and petroleum
distillates. Investigators also saw stained soil where spills had occurred. In 1983, COGS, Inc.
purchased the property. The new owner removed the drums and placed the stained soil into four
drums, which remained on-site. The property currently is being used to store construction
materials. Approximately 3,000 people live within a 1-mile radius of the site. Residences
around *he site, including those in the trailer park, are hooked up to a public water system.
Three other hazardous waste sites listed on the National Priorities List are located within 1 mile
of the EEC Trucking site, which complicates analysis of pollution problems in the area.
Site Responsibility:
This site was addressed through
Federal actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 10/15/84
Final Date: 06/10/86
Deleted Date: 10/14/92
Threats and Contaminants
An EPA investigation in 1988 detected low levels of benzene and the heavy metal
arsenic in the groundwater. Sediments and surface soils contained low levels of
polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. The results of the risk assessment performed
during intensive study of the site revealed that current risks to human health are
minimal.
November 1994
-------
Cleanup Approach
Response Action Status
Immediate Actions: In 1983, the property owner removed 50 surface drums.
Stained soil located around the drums was excavated and was contained in drums on
site; these drums were removed by EPA in 1991.
Entire Site: The site was added to the National Priorities List based on the potential
future threat to public health and the environment. Based upon the results of studies
performed at the site, it was determined that, as a result of the cleanup activities
conducted at the site in 1983, the site does not pose a significant threat to human health and the
environment. In 1989, EPA recommended no further action at the site, except for monitoring of
the ground water, surface water, and sediments to ensure the protection of human health and the
environment. Groundwater, surface water and sediment samples were collected from the site in
late 1991 as part of the monitoring program. Based on the sampling results, it was determined
that significant contaminant migration is not occurring at the site. The site will be sampled again
in 1996.
Site Facts: A Notice of Intent to Delete the site was published in the Federal Register in the
summer of 1992. After considering public comments related to the Notice of Intent to Delete, a
Notice to Delete the site was published in the Federal Register on October 14, 1992.
Environmental Progress
Removal of the on-site drums and contaminated soil eliminated potential sources of
contamination. Intensive investigation of the conditions at the BEC Trucking site has shown that
the levels of contaminants in the ground water, surface water, and sediments are within the
accepted State and Federal guidelines. Further site-wide cleanup actions are not required, and the
site has been deleted from the National Priorities List.
November 1994 2 BEC TRUCKING
-------
BIOCLINICAL
LABORATORIE
INC.
NEW YORK
EPA ID# NYD980768683
A REGION 2
Suffolk County
1585 Smithtown Avenue
in the Hamlet of Bohemia
Site Description
The 3,000-square-foot Bioclinical Laboratories (BCL) site at 1585 Smithtown Avenue in Bohemia
is a rental unit within a 10-unit, single-story building. BCL formulated, mixed, repackaged, and
distributed chemicals from 1978 to 1981. Operators stored drums of hazardous wastes on site,
some of which leaked. When washing chemically-contaminated containers for reuse, workers
routinely poured rinse water directly onto the ground or discharged it to sinks, a septic
tank/distribution pool, and storm drains. Analysts sampled these structures when citizen concerns
prompted an investigation by the county in 1981. The county discovered a range of organic
contaminants, including solvents, in the sanitary systems. In July 1981, a fire at the site
destroyed much of BCL's inventory. BCL reincorporated its operations at another location in
Bohemia; the previous unit is now occupied by another company. In November 1981, the county
sampled three private drinking water wells about W-mile south of the site and detected
chloroform in them. According to a 1984 State investigation, the site may have contributed to the
contamination by chloroform and other volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the area's soil and
groundwater. The site lies in an industrial setting in a major suburban area of Long Island.
Municipal and private wells downgradient of the site serve 10,000 residents. The Suffolk County
Water Authority currently draws water from an uncontaminated aquifer. A nearby public water
supply, the Church Street well field, is also uncontaminated. MacArthur Airport is located about
Vi-mile north of the site. The population within 1 mile is 1,600, and 26,000 people live within 3
miles. Rattlesnake Brook, which is used for recreation, is within 3 miles of the site.
Site Responsibility:
This site was addressed through
Federal and local actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 06/10/86
Final Date: 03/31/89
Deletion Date: 09/09/94
December 1994
-------
Threats and Contaminants
The on-site groundwater contains low levels of VOCs, including chloroform and
methylene chloride, and low levels of some heavy metals, including chromium and
lead. Soils also are contaminated with low levels of VOCs and heavy metals. The
public is not exposed to site contamination. Studies indicated that the ingestion of the
on-site groundwater no longer poses a significant risk.
Cleanup Approach
Response Action Status
Entire Site: In 1988, the EPA began studies of the site to explore the nature and
extent of contamination. Analysis of constituents in the sanitary systems by the
Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS) in the fall of 1991 revealed
no contamination in the east sanitary system and some contamination of the west sanitary system.
As a result of subsequent enforcement actions taken by the SCDHS in conjunction with the
tenant, BCL cleaned the west sanitary system. Recent analysis of groundwater, soil, and the
septic tanks has revealed low levels of contamination. Some groundwater contaminants exceed
New York State drinking water standards both downgradient and upgradient of the site, but these
sources are not in use. Therefore, in the fall of 1992, EPA determined that no further action was
required at the site.
Site Facts: In November 1981, the County issued an order to BCL, requiring removal of all
fire-damaged containers from the site and all industrial wastes from the sanitary system. It also
required the owner to prepare and submit a plan to install on-site monitoring wells to detect any
contamination in groundwater. BCL removed all chemicals and pumped the wastewater system
clean but did not install the wells.
Environmental Progress
After the site was added to the NPL, local enforcement of environmental codes and regulations
resulted in the cleanup of the most heavily contaminated areas. The EPA determined that no
further actions are required to protect public health or the environment. The site has been
deleted from the NPL and no longer poses a threat to people or the environment.
December 1994 2 BIOCLINICAL LABORATORIES, INC.
-------
BREWSTER W
FIELD
NEW YORK
EPA ID# NYD980652275
EPA REGION 2
Putnam County
Village of Brewster
Site Description
Volatile organic compounds (VOCs), primarily tetrachloroethylene, were discovered in the
Brewster Well Field's water distribution system in 1978. The source of the contamination was
traced to a dry- cleaning establishment that has been in operation since 1958. Operators disposed
of dry-cleaning wastes in a dry well adjacent to the site until 1983. Subsequent testing revealed a
large plume of groundwater contamination. Between 1978 and 1984, Brewster used several
drilling, blending, and pumping strategies to reduce contaminant levels. In 1984, the Village of
Brewster, in association with EPA's Office of Research and Development, installed a packed-col-
umn air stripping unit to evaporate the VOCs and to provide safe drinking water. Aquifers at this
site provide drinking water for approximately 2,000 area residents. The nearby East Branch
Croton River is a significant brown trout fishery and, in combination with two other nearby
streams, is a part of the Croton System contributing to New York City's water supply. A water
intake lies 12 miles downstream of the site. Woods and wetlands surround the well heads, pump
houses, and access roads, and the wetlands connect directly with the East Branch Croton River.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal, State, and local actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 12/30/82
Final Date: 09/08/83
Threats and Contaminants
Groundwater is contaminated with various VOCs, including tetrachloroethylene and
vinyl chloride. River water and sediments also contain VOCs, but at much lower
concentrations. Since the water supply at the public well field is currently being
cleaned to drinking water standards, the health threat is reduced. However, surface
water requires continued monitoring to ensure that there are no ill effects on river life.
November 1 994
-------
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in two long-term remedial phases focusing on cleanup of the
groundwater and control of the source of contamination.
Response Action Status
Groundwater: The State began a site study to determine the nature and extent of the
groundwater contamination and to evaluate remedial alternatives in early 1984.
During the course of the study, the Village of Brewster installed a full-scale packed
column air stripper that treated the entire water supply. On the basis of results from the State's
study, EPA selected a remedy for the site in 1986 that included continuing to operate the existing
air stripping system at the well field, and designing and constructing a groundwater management
system that will contain the plume of contamination and restore groundwater quality in the
vicinity of the site. The groundwater management system extracts water from wells, treats it with
an air stripper, and reinjects the treated water into the ground. EPA began construction of this
remedy in 1987. The groundwater management system is expected to be in operation in 1995.
Source Control: In 1988, following the completion of a source control study, EPA
selected a remedy for cleaning up the source of the groundwater contamination that
included: excavating about 100 cubic yards of sediments, sludge, and soil contaminat-
ed with VOCs from the dry well located outside of the dry cleaners; treating and disposing of
these materials off site; removing the concrete dry well structure from outside the dry cleaners;
and decontaminating the dry well structure and debris and disposing of them off site at an
EPA-approved hazardous waste facility. EPA began cleanup activities in 1989 and completed
them in 1991.
Environmental Progress
The source of the contamination at the well field has been excavated and removed from the site.
The Village of Brewster's groundwater treatment system continues to treat groundwater for
distribution to the public, eliminating the risk of ingesting contaminated water. The operation of
the groundwater management system that will treat the contaminated groundwater will further
eliminate the health risks associated with the contaminants in the groundwater.
November 1994 2 BREWSTER WELL FIELD
-------
REGION 2
* Suffolk County
NATIONAL \^^rt
LABORATOR
(USDOE)
NEW YORK
EPA ID#NY7890008975
Site Description
Other Names:
BNL
The Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) site is a research and development facility covering
5,265 acres in Upton, at the center of Long Island. The Army used the site as Camp Upton
during World Wars I and II. Since 1947, Associated Universities, Inc. has operated the BNL,
under contract, first to the Atomic Energy Commission and now to the U.S. Department of
Energy (USDOE). BNL conducts basic and applied research in high energy nuclear and solid
state physics, fundamental material and structure properties and the interaction of matter, nuclear
medicine, biomedical and environmental sciences, and selected energy technologies. To conduct
this research, BNL designs, builds, and runs installations for scientific research, such as particle
accelerators and nuclear reactors. Most of its main facilities comprise an area of approximately
900 acres near the center of the site. Outlying facilities cover about 550 acres and include the
hazardous waste management facility (HWMF), the biology fields, a former landfill area, and a
sewage treatment plant. The remainder of the facility is largely wooded. In 1960, workers
pumped about 5 curies of radioactive slurry into a groundwater monitoring well near the HWMF
instead of into the fill pipe of a nearby underground tank. Workers deposited 3 tons of wastes
each day in the former landfill, which closed in 1966. A small percentage of the wastes were
hazardous or radioactive and included laboratory debris, equipment, clothing, animal carcasses,
and sanitary wastes. Sewage sludge was disposed of periodically. The current landfill began
operating in 1967, accepting garbage, other solid waste, and building materials. Limited
quantities of low-level radioactive materials were accepted until 1978. BNL lies over groundwater
that is designated as a sole source aquifer. Approximately 15,500 people draw drinking water
from BNL wells and from Suffolk County Water Authority wells within 3 miles of BNL. The
headwaters of the Peconic River are on BNL property in a freshwater wetland upgradient of the
known areas of concern. Surface water within 3 miles downstream of the site is used for
recreation.
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through NRL L|ST|NQ HISTORY
Federal actions. Proposed Date: 07/14/89
Final Date: 11/21/89
November 1 994
-------
Threats and Contaminants
Past practices and accidents at BNL have resulted in a number of areas where
contamination is known or suspected. Twenty-eight areas of concern have been
identified. On-site groundwater and soil are contaminated with volatile organic
compounds (VOCs), radioactive materials including cesium-137, strontium-90 and
tritium, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
(PAHs). Accidental contamination has occurred in building sumps, the central steam
facility, and the HWMF. Soil in several small areas contains low levels of
radioactivity from the accidental use of contaminated soil for landscaping. At the
HWMF, drum rinsing and spills of VOCs contaminated groundwater. Monitoring
indicates that the leading edge of this plume has reached the southern site boundary,
but that no residential wells have been effected. On-site, contaminated drinking water
wells have been closed or treatment systems have been added, reducing the potential
for drinking polluted water.
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in two phases: initial actions and seven long-term remedial phases
focusing on final cleanup of 28 areas on concern.
Response Action Status
Initial Actions: The USDOE has completed two emergency removal actions. In
both cases, contaminated soil was discovered during construction activities, excavated
and disposed of off site. In early 1992, oil and PCB-contaminated soil was
discovered near Building 479. Approximately 260 cubic yards of contaminated soil were removed
and disposed of before work on Building 479 was completed in the summer of 1992. In the
spring of 1993, mercury- and PCB-contaminated soil was discovered during the excavation of an
abandoned catch basin at Building 464. Approximately 252 tons of soil were excavated and
shipped off site for treatment and disposal. A small volume of the most contaminated soil is
stored in containers at BNL awaiting off-site treatment and disposal. Approximately 150 cubic
yards of soil contaminated with Cesium-137 were removed from another construction area and
safely stored on site. USDOE has started investigation activities for two planned initial actions to
address the air spray aeration area and to close the landfills. Several underground storage tanks
have been removed since 1990. Other cesspools, storage tanks, and three large radioactively
contaminated tanks will be removed as necessary.
Entire Site: The USDOE has begun investigations of the BNL facility and identified
28 areas of concern, which will be addressed through a seven-part phased approach to
cleaning up the site. Investigations for each phase are exploring the nature and extent
of contamination and will recommend the best strategies for final cleanup. Remedies are expected
to be selected for the different areas of concern during the period from 1995 to 1998.
November 1994 2 BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL
LABORATORY (USDOE)
-------
Site Facts: The EPA, USDOE, and the State have negotiated an Interagency Agreement (IAG)
for USDOE to investigate and clean up environmental problems at BNL. This document became
effective in May 1992 following a period reserved for public comment.
Environmental Progress
Removal of contaminated soil has reduced the threat for exposure to hazardous materials while
investigations leading to the selection of final cleanup remedies are ongoing.
BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL
LABORATORY (USDOE)
November 1994
-------
BYRON BARREL
AND DRUM
NEW YORK
EPA ID# NYD980780670
EPA REGION 2
Genesee County
9 miles north of Batavia
Site Description
The Byron Barrel and Drum site occupies about 2 acres of an 8-acre parcel. It contains an
abandoned gravel pit and formerly was used as a salvage yard for heavy construction equipment.
In 1982, it was revealed that the site had been used for hazardous waste disposal. Approximately
200 drums of solid and liquid chemical wastes were abandoned on the site without any spill
control or containment provisions. Over 200 additional drums were ripped or crushed, mixed
with soil, and covered over. Other drums were disposed of in a ravine. Testing by the New
York State Department of Environmental Conservation showed hazardous, reactive, and
flammable materials, as well as poly chlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), in many of the drums. The
site is bordered by heavily wooded areas and is next to farmlands. Surface water is believed to
drain to Oak Orchard Creek, which is within Vz-mile of the site. The property lies within 2
miles of a residential area. Approximately 20 people draw drinking water from wells within 1
mile of the site; 2,200 others live within a 3-mile radius. Water supplies are privately provided
from both surface water and groundwater. Testing of residential wells near the site through early
1994 showed no site-related contaminantion.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal and potentially responsible
parties' actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 10/15/84
Final Date: 06/10/86
Threats and Contaminants
On-site groundwater and soil are contaminated with volatile organic compounds and
heavy metals. Although on-site groundwater is contaminated, it does not pose a threat
to people under existing site conditions.
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in two stages: emergency actions and a long-term remedial phase
focusing on cleanup of the entire site.
November 1994
-------
Response Action Status
Emergency Actions: In 1984, EPA removed drums and 40 cubic yards of
contaminated soils and debris from the site and disposed of them at an EPA-approved
hazardous waste disposal facility. EPA also installed a monitoring well, sampled
soils, and tested nearby private wells. In 1990, during an EPA site inspection, 10 additional
drums were found and disposed of off site.
Entire Site: In 1989, EPA completed site studies to determine the nature and extent
of the contamination at the site and to evaluate cleanup alternatives. The selected
remedy for the site includes flushing contaminants from the subsurface soil while
leaving it in place, and evaporating volatile ground water contaminants by air stripping and then
decontaminating the vapors with activated carbon. The design of the selected remedy is being
performed by the potentially responsible parties. It is scheduled for completion in late 1995.
Site Facts: EPA issued an Administrative Order in 1984, requiring the property owner to take
immediate corrective actions to clean up the site. The owner did not comply with the order. In
1989, EPA issued an Administrative Order to the potentially responsible parties for the
performance of the engineering design and the cleanup of the site, which is currently underway.
Environmental Progress
Removing drums and soil contaminated has reduced the potential for exposure to hazardous
substances at the Byron Barrel and Drum site while design of the final cleanup remedies
continues.
November 1 994 2 BYRON BARREL AND DRUM
-------
C & J DISPOS
LEASING CO.
NEW YORK
EPA ID# NYD981561954
Site Description
EPA REGION 2
Madison County
Eaton
During the 1970s, industrial wastes were disposed of in a trench on property adjacent to
residential property owned by the C & J Leasing Company. The disposal site was never licensed
or permitted for this purpose and the amount of material disposed of there is unknown. During
1976, C & J Leasing was observed dumping what appeared to be paint sludges and other liquid
industrial waste materials into the trench. An inspection of the site by New York State revealed
75 to 100 drums lying in a pool of liquid waste. The trench was later covered with clean fill,
reportedly by C & J Leasing, burying the drums in the process. After the site was placed on the
NPL in 1989, C & J Leasing excavated the site without authorization. The drums that were
believed to have been buried there may have been removed at that time. The area around the site
is rural; there are 12 residences within 1,800 feet of the site that depend on private wells for
drinking water. As many as 3,000 people live within 3 miles of the site and also depend on
wells for drinking water. A small pond and wetland area are located 100 feet downgradient from
the disposal trench. The pond discharges to Woodman Pond, approximately 3,000 feet south of
the site. Prior to 1989, Woodman Pond provided drinking water to an estimated 3,800 people in
the Village of Hamilton and now serves as the backup water supply for the Village of Hamilton.
Site Responsibility:
This site was addressed through
Federal and a potentially
responsible party's actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 06/24/88
Final Date: 03/31/89
Deletion Date: 09/20/94
Threats and Contaminants
Soils in the disposal trench were found to be contaminated with a variety of hazardous
organic compounds, including phthalates, phenols, and volatile organic chemicals
(VOCs), as well as lead. Surficial soil samples contained similar chemicals.
Sediments from the small pond indicated contamination, as well. The contaminants in
the trench were bound in the waste matrix and to the site soils, but could have been
released in significant amounts into the groundwater or migrated off-site in surface
water run-off. Potential health threats included direct contact exposure, drinking
contaminated groundwater, and eating contaminated fish or other aquatic life.
Migration of contaminants to an adjacent agricultural field posed a risk from eating
foods grown there. Drainage of chemicals from the disposal area threatened
Woodman Pond and State-designated wetlands, including an adjacent ecological
preserve known as Fiddler's Green.
November 1994
-------
Cleanup Approach
Response Action Status
Immediate Actions: EPA stabilized several stockpiles of soil and waste material
that were left from the unauthorized excavation of the trench by the C & J Leasing
Company. Site security measures were upgraded by the installation of fences and
gates, and sampling of the site was performed for waste disposal classification.
Entire Site: A site study was conducted from late 1989 to early 1991 to determine
the nature and extent of the contamination at the site and to evaluate cleanup
alternatives. In early 1991, EPA selected a remedy that called for the excavation,
removal, and off-site disposal of the contaminated soil and debris at an EPA-approved disposal
facility. The remedy also included quarterly monitoring of both on-site and off-site wells for a
period of one year. Cleanup of the adjacent pond was not required. In the fall of 1991, one of
the potentially responsible parties associated with the chemicals found at the site agreed to
conduct the necessary design and cleanup operations at the site. EPA approved the proposed
design for the cleanup in the fall of 1992 and on-site activities began shortly thereafter.
Excavation and removal of the contaminated soil and debris was completed in early 1993.
Although it was originally estimated that approximately 1,250 cubic yards of contaminated soil
and debris were contained in the trench area, the discovery of additional waste material, which
extended the trench further northward, resulted in the total excavation of over 2,400 cubic feet of
waste material from the trench. The waste material was taken to a permitted off-site disposal
facility. The trench was backfilled and final site restoration activities were completed in the
summer of 1993. Quarterly testing of on-site monitoring wells and local residential wells has
been completed and found no contaminant migration.
Site Facts: EPA issued an Administrative Order in May 1989 to prevent further unauthorized
excavation of the site by C & J Leasing. In September 1991, one potentially responsible party
signed a Consent Decree to reimburse EPA for its past expenditures on response actions at the
site. A Unilateral Administrative Order was also issued in September 1991 to the same
potentially responsible party to perform the design and complete the implementation of the
selected remedy.
Environmental Progress
The threat to human health and the environment has been eliminated with the complete removal
of all contaminated soil and debris from the site. A one-year groundwater monitoring program
has been completed, revealing that no contaminants from the site have migrated to any of the on-
site wells or nearby residential wells. The EPA has deleted the site from the NPL.
November 1994 2 C & J DISPOSAL LEASING CO. DUMP
-------
CARROLL AND DUBIES
SEWAGE DISPOS
NEW YORK
EPA ID# NYD010968014
Site Description
EPA REGION 2
Orange County
1 mile northeast of Port Jervis
The Carroll and Dubies Sewage Disposal site is made up of seven inactive lagoons that were used
for the disposal of various wastes since about 1970. Until 1979, waste from two nearby cosmetic
manufacturers was deposited into unlined lagoons at the site. Septic tank waste also was accepted
at the site until 1989. Five of the seven lagoons have been filled, covered, and graded. The two
uncovered lagoons are fenced. Piles of deteriorating debris and abandoned motor vehicles were
removed from the site. Approximately 2,000 residents live within a mile of the site. The nearest
homes are about 1/4 mile southeast of the site. A steep slope, woods, open areas and the Port
Jervis Municipal Landfill surround the facility. The City of Port Jervis is supplied with water
from several reservoirs located more than a mile upstream from the site. Homes near the site rely
on private wells. Approximately 1,500 feet to the east of the site is Cold Creek, which lies
between the site and the Neversink River.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal and potentially responsible
parties' actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 06/24/88
Final Date: 02/21/90
Threats and Contaminants
On-site groundwater is contaminated with volatile organic compounds (VOCs) as well
as heavy metals including lead. Lagoon liquids and sediments contain heavy metals
including chromium, copper, lead, and nickel; VOCs; and a plastics by-product,
phthalates. Potential threats to human health include drinking contaminated
groundwater, accidentally ingesting or touching contaminated lagoon liquids or lagoon
sediments, and inhaling vapors from the active lagoon.
November 1 994
-------
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in two long-term remedial phases focusing on cleanup of the
groundwater and the source areas.
Response Action Status
Groundwater: The groundwater investigation is being conducted in two phases.
The first phase of the investigation was completed in 1992 and involved identifying
the nature and extent of on-site contamination of the groundwater. The second phase
of the investigation is to determine whether off-site migration of contaminants through the
groundwater has occurred. The Phase II investigation is scheduled for completion in late 1995.
The information obtained from the Phase I and II investigations will be utilized to select an
appropriate remedy for the cleanup of the groundwater.
Source Areas: The source area investigations involve characterizing the nature and
extent of chemical compounds associated with the lagoons by obtaining soil samples.
An investigation that determined the extent of the contamination of four lagoons was
completed in 1992. An investigation to determine the nature and extent of contamination of three
additional lagoons, identified through aerial photographs, was completed in 1993. The results of
these investigations will be used to recommend alternatives for the final cleanup of the source
areas.
Site Facts: The EPA began an investigation into the nature and extent of the contamination at
the site in 1989. In 1990, the EPA and two parties potentially responsible for the site
contamination entered into an Administrative Order on Consent requiring the parties to complete
the study.
Environmental Progress
After adding this site to the NPL, the EPA performed preliminary investigations and determined
that no immediate actions were required at the Carroll and Dubies Sewage Disposal site while
further investigations are conducted, which will lead to the selection of final cleanup activities.
November 1994 2 CARROLL AND DUBIES SEWAGE DISPOSAL
-------
CIRCUITRON
NEW YORK
EPA ID# NYD981 184229
Site Description
Circuitron Corporation manufactured circuit boards on this 1-acre site from 1981 to 1986. The
site is in a densely populated industrial and commercial area of Long Island. The property is
owned by 82 Milbar Boulevard Corporation. Circuitron was a subsidiary of FEE Industries,
which ADI Electronics, Inc. bought in 1984. The circuit board process at the facility included
drilling, screening, plating, and scrubbing processes, all of which generated chemical wastes.
Wastes were reportedly placed in aboveground and underground tanks and storm drains.
Thousands of gallons of plating wastes were discharged to an underground leaching pool that was
licensed under the State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (SPDES) and to an unauthorized
leaching pool beneath the floor of the plating room. In 1986, the company vacated the facility. In
1987, the EPA found potentially explosive conditions at the site. Over 100 drums, most
unmarked, were left throughout the building. Incompatible and reactive wastes were not
segregated. Some drums were marked sulfuric acid, hydrochloric acid, sodium hydroxide, and
caustic soda. Other smaller containers were scattered outside. Six concrete holding tanks
containing unknown materials were below the floor and three aboveground storage tanks were
behind the building. An important source of drinking water for residents and industry lies under
the site. Located within 3 miles of the site is a residential community of approximately 215,000
people; approximately 1,200 people live within 1 mile. Fifteen municipal wells serving local
residents are also located within 3 miles of the site and serve 88,000 people. The nearest well is
located within 1,306 feet of the site and is in the path of the groundwater flow. A shallow well,
which could be used for drinking water, has been closed since 1978 due to contamination.
r.- r, •,-•,• m.- • • u • .« A vu u ^PL LISTING HISTORY
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through
Federal actions.
Threats and Contaminants
Proposed Date: 06/24/88
Final Date: 03/31/89
The groundwater, soils, and sediments in the leaching pools are contaminated with
heavy metals and volatile organic compounds (VOCs). This site is a potential health
concern because of the possibility of exposure to hazardous substances through
accidental ingestion or contact with contaminated groundwater, soils, or sediments.
December 1994
-------
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in three stages: emergency actions and two long-term
remedial phases, one focusing on cleanup of contaminated soil, sediments, and building dust, and
the other focusing on cleanup of off-site ground water.
Response Action Status
Emergency Actions: In 1987, the EPA initiated an emergency removal of the
more than 100 chemical containers and storage tanks on site. In 1988, the EPA
conducted another emergency cleanup action that entailed sampling and removing
approximately 20 drums, three aboveground tanks, seven underground storage tanks, two
below-surface treatment basins, and several leaching basins still on site. The action involved
consolidating the various waste streams, removing the tanks located at the rear of the property,
and removing contaminated debris inside the building. In total, 100 cubic yards of contaminated
soil and debris, 50 drums of hazardous liquid, and an additional 2,000 to 3,000 gallons of tanked
hazardous liquids were removed and properly disposed of off site. In the summer of 1992, during
the cleanup design phase, the entire site was fenced in and secured and all debris was removed
from the site.
Soil, Sediments, and Building Dust: A comprehensive investigation of the site
was completed in early 1991. The EPA selected a remedy in the spring of 1991 to
address contamination in the soil, sediments, and building dust. Contaminated soils
will be treated by in-place vapor extraction. This process involves placing a cover over the soil
and applying a vacuum, which pulls VOCs out of the spaces between soil particles. The remedy
included excavating the contaminated sediments from the leaching pools, cesspools, and storm
drains and treating and disposing of them off site. Dust from the building also was to be
removed, treated, and disposed of off site. The remedial design was started in the summer of
1991. During the remedial design activities, it was established that the extent of soil
contamination on the site was more extensive than the earlier investigation indicated.
Furthermore, it was decided that renovating the on-site building to a usable condition was not
cost effective, and that the building should be demolished. The remedial design was completed
in the fall of 1994. Final cleanup activities are scheduled for completion in late 1995.
Groundwater: A separate investigation to more fully define the nature and extent of
the contamination in the groundwater was initiated in early 1992 and was completed
in the fall of 1994. The remedy involves pumping and treating the contaminated
groundwater. The engineering design of the remedy has begun and is expected to last about one
year.
Environmental Progress
The emergency actions taken to remove hazardous materials have eliminated the potentially
explosive conditions and reduced the potential for exposure to contamination at the Circuitron
Corporation site while additional cleanup activities are underway.
December 1994 2 CIRCUITRON CORPORATION
-------
CLAREMONT
POLYCHEMICAL
NEW YORK
EPA ID# NYD002044584
EPA REGION 2
Nassau County
Old Bethpage
Site Description
Claremont Polychemical, situated on an approximately 9J/2-acre site, is a former manufacturer of
pigments for plastics and inks that operated from 1966 to 1980. During its operation, Claremont
Polychemical Corporation disposed of liquid wastes in three leaching basins and deposited solid
wastes and treatment sludges in drums or in old, aboveground metal tanks. During a series of
inspections in 1979, the Nassau County Department of Health (NCDH) found 2,000 to 3,000
drums containing inks, resins, and organic solvents throughout the site. Some of the drums were
uncovered, while others reportedly were leaking or lying on their sides. NCDH inspectors noted
that an area east of the building was contaminated with organic solvents that resulted from spills
and discharges. Claremont sorted and removed the drums from the site in 1980. A subsequent
investigation by NCDH revealed most of the drums were gone, but an area of soil, referred to as
"spill area," was visibly contaminated with inks and solvents. As a result, Claremont was
directed to install groundwater monitoring wells. Since Claremont declared bankruptcy in 1980,
ownership of the site and management of cleanup activities shifted to the New York Bankruptcy
Court. The closest residences are located approximately Vz-mile from the site. Approximately
47,000 people draw drinking water from wells located within 3 miles of the site. The nearest
public water supply well is 3,500 feet northwest of the site.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 10/15/84
Final Date: 06/10/86
Threats and Contaminants
On-site soils contaminated with tetrachloroethene (PCE) located in the former "spill
area" constitute a potential threat to groundwater resources. Fifteen underground
tanks, holding liquid and sludge wastes containing volatile organic compounds
(VOCs), were present at the site. Widespread concentrations of heavy metals,
including copper and zinc, are present in dust accumulated throughout the process
building. Shallow groundwater is contaminated with VOCs including PCE, trans-1, 2-
dichloroethene, trichloroethene, ethylbenzene, acetone, methylene chloride, xylenes,
and vinyl chloride. Heavy metals detected in excess of Federal and State standards
include arsenic, chromium, lead, and manganese. Should the contaminants move into
the public drinking water, residents could be exposed to contaminants by drinking
affected water or inhaling the volatile compounds present in the water. A considerable
amount of trespassing and vandalism have occurred at the site in the past. Currently,
the site is fenced and access is restricted to EPA-authorized personnel.
November 1994
-------
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in three stages: immediate actions and two long-term remedial phases
focusing on the removal and disposal of hazardous materials and on-site soil and groundwater
cleanup.
Response Action Status
Immediate Actions: The EPA removed 13,000 gallons of hazardous liquid wastes
contained in drums, aboveground tanks, basins, and other areas. Fifteen underground
storage tanks were removed and their contents transported off-site for treatment and
disposal. Additional fencing was installed at the site from 1988 to 1991, and a security guard was
posted at the facility in order to avoid vandalism and unauthorized entry.
Removal and Disposal of Hazardous Materials: The cleanup strategies chosen
by the EPA included: compatibility testing and consolidation of over 700 containers
(drums and bags) of raw materials, process wastes, and finished products currently
stored on site; transporting both organic and inorganic wastes to an off-site treatment, storage,
and disposal facility; using appropriate treatments to reduce the toxicity, mobility, and volume of
the wastes before landfilling; and handling wastes contained in aboveground tanks and treatment
basins in a similar fashion. These cleanup activities were completed in 1991.
Soil and Groundwater: In 1990, the EPA completed an investigation into the
nature and extent of soil and groundwater contamination. The groundwater remedy
selected includes extracting and treating the groundwater by air stripping and carbon
absorption and then reinjecting the treated water into the ground. Approximately 1,600 cubic
yards of contaminated soil will be excavated and treated by low heat. The treated soil will be
deposited in the excavated areas. Highly contaminated soil will be excavated, treated, and
disposed of off site. Buildings will be decontaminated by vacuuming and dusting the contaminated
surfaces, and asbestos insulation will be removed for off site treatment and disposal. The cleanup
activities are underway, and are scheduled to be completed in 1996.
Environmental Progress
The immediate removal of hazardous liquids, the construction of a security fence, the removal,
treatment, and disposal of hazardous wastes, and the excavation and off-site treatment and
disposal of the underground storage tanks have reduced the potential for exposure to hazardous
materials at the Claremont Polychemical site while the cleanup of the soil and groundwater
contamination is underway.
November 1994 2 CLAREMONT POLYCHEMICAL
-------
CLOTHIER /-TT7 Ep* REGION 2
-------
Cleanup Approach
Response Action Status
Initial Actions: During 1986, drums were moved to a centralized on-site location.
A number of potentially responsible parties later removed 1,858 drums of waste. In
1987 and 1988, EPA removed the remaining drums and the visibly-contaminated soil
and debris associated with the drums. Subsequent sampling indicated that low concentrations of
residual contamination remain on site.
Entire Site: In 1989, following the completion of a site study to determine the nature
and extent of the contamination at, and emanating from, the site and to evaluate
remedial alternatives, a remedy was selected for the site. The selected remedy called
for: regrading, placing a 1-foot soil cover over the residually contaminated areas, and
revegetating the site; installing erosion control devices, as needed, on the embankment sloping
towards Ox Creek; implementing institutional controls to prevent the use of underlying
groundwater or any land use involving significant disturbance of the soil cover; and long-term
groundwater, soil, sediment, and surface water monitoring. In the summer of 1991, the
engineering design was completed and cleanup began. In the fall of 1992, the installation of the
soil cover was completed. During grading activities for the soil cover, seven drums were
uncovered. The drums and soil surrounding them were loaded into dumpsters and removed.
The site was then revegetated. A Close-out Report, documenting the completion of the cleanup,
was approved in December 1993. The site is presently in the process of being deleted from the
NPL.
Site Facts: In 1986, a Consent Order was signed with several potentially responsible parties
requiring them to dispose of a number of drums located on-site. In 1989, the potentially
responsible parties signed a Consent Decree to design and implement the remedy and to provide
the long-term monitoring and inspections of the site.
Environmental Progress
The removal of drums and visibly-contaminated soil have reduced the potential for exposure to
contaminated materials at the Clothier Disposal site. Final cleanup activities, including the
installation of the soil cover over the residually-contaminated areas, have provided additional
protection. The site is now in the process of being deleted from the NPL.
November 1994 2 CLOTHIER DISPOSAL
-------
COLESVILLE
MUNICIPAL
LANDFILL
NEW YORK
EPA ID# NYD980768691
EPA REGION 2
Broome County
Colesville
Site Description
The 30-acre Colesville Municipal Landfill site was owned and operated by the Town of Coles-
ville from 1965 until 1969, when ownership was transferred to Broome County. The landfill
accepted about 9,000 tons of municipal refuse each year. From 1973 to 1975, industrial wastes,
such as organic solvents, dyes, and metals, were deposited in the landfill. Two streams collect
drainage from the landfill and empty into the Susquehanna River. The New York State
Department of Health inspected the site in 1984 and detected volatile organic compounds (VOCs)
in the groundwater. Approximately 1,900 people live within 3 miles of the site and depend on
private wells as their source of drinking water. The closest residence is located 300 feet from the
site. The area is rural and woodlands surround the landfill. The Susquehanna River is used for
fishing and recreational activities.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal, State, local, and potentially
responsible party actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 10/15/84
Final Date: 06/10/86
Threats and Contaminants
Private wells, sediments, soil, and leachate draining from the landfill are contaminated
with VOCs. People who come in contact with contaminated well water or soil may be
at risk. Leachate drains into two on-site streams, which are tributaries of the Susque-
hanna River. Although the river is not used as a source of drinking water, it is used
for fishing and recreation. Deer and wild turkeys forage for food on the site, and
people who eat these animals, which may contain bioaccumulated contaminants, may
suffer adverse health effects.
November 1994
-------
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in two stages: an initial action and a long-term remedial phase
focusing on cleanup of the entire site.
Response Action Status
Initial Action: The County is providing residents with bottled water or activated
charcoal filters for contaminated private wells and is monitoring the wells quarterly.
Entire Site: In 1991, following the completion of a site study to determine the
nature and extent of the contamination at the site and to evaluate remedial
alternatives, a remedy for the site was selected. The remedy includes capping the
landfill to reduce the movement of soil contaminants, installing a leachate collection system, air
stripping groundwater and decontaminating the vapors with carbon adsorption, and constructing
and operating a new water supply system for the affected residents. The potentially responsible
parties completed the engineering design for the remedy in the summer of 1994. Cleanup
activities are expected to be completed in 1996.
Site Facts: The potentially responsible parties and the State of New York signed a Consent
Order in 1987. Under this order, the potentially responsible parties agreed to undertake a study
and to conduct design and cleanup activities under State supervision.
Environmental Progress
The provision of bottled water and charcoal filters on the affected wells has reduced the risk of
exposure to contaminated groundwater at the Colesville Landfill site while final cleanup activities
are underway.
November 1994 2 COLESVILLE MUNICIPAL LANDFILL
-------
CONKLIN f-sn EPA REGION 2
l,v<:: ..\ Broome County
DUMPS
NEW YORK
EPA ID# NYD981486947
Site Description
The Conklin Dumps site consists of two landfllled areas totaling about 37 acres, referred to as the "Upper
Landfill" and the "Lower Landfill." The Lower Landfill, which was operated between 1964 and 1969,
contains approximately 33,000 cubic yards of wastes. It is believed that only municipal solid waste was
disposed of in the Lower Landfill. The Upper Landfill contains approximately 72,000 cubic yards of
waste. It is believed that some industrial wastes were co-disposed with municipal solid wastes in the
Upper Landfill. Leachate from the two landfills drains into Carlin Creek, a tributary of the Susquehanna
River. Approximately 700 people live within 1 mile of the site. The closest residents live 1/4 mile from
the landfills' boundary. Approximately 2,000 people depend on wells within 3 miles of the site for their
drinking water. The area immediately surrounding the landfills is proposed for development as an
industrial park. The U.S. Department of the Interior has designated a large wetland on the site as an
important biological resource.
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through
Federal, State, and local actions.
Final Date: 03/31/89
Threats and Contaminants
Groundwater and leachate from the landfills contain various volatile organic compounds
(VOCs) and heavy metals. If contaminants seep from the landfills into the wetland area,
environmental damage could result. People who touch or accidentally ingest contaminat-
ed groundwater or leachate may be at risk.
November 1994
-------
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in a long-term remedial phase focusing on cleanup of the entire site.
Response Action Status
Entire Site: Under state supervision, the Town of Conklin, the potentially responsible
party, conducted a site study to determine the nature and extent of contamination at, and
emanating from, the site and to identify cleanup alternatives. The study was completed
in early 1991. In the spring of 1991, the EPA selected a remedy to clean up the site, which includes
capping the landfills, pumping and collecting leachate, and treating the leachate off site at a publicly-
owned treatment works or on site, if the off-site treatment is not feasible. During preliminary design
activities associated with the selected remedy, it was determined that the construction of a leachate
collection trench and cap at the Lower Landfill would present significant engineering difficulties due
to the proximity of an adjacent wetland and railroad tracks. In addition, installing a cap on the
Lower Landfill could negatively impact the adjacent wetland in that it would encroach on the
wetland. Due to these technical feasibility and environmental concerns, a modified remedy
consisting of excavating the Lower Landfill, consolidating the excavated Lower Landfill contents
onto the Upper Landfill, capping the Upper Landfill, and constructing a leachate collection and treat-
ment system was proposed by the town. After careful study and analysis, the EPA and the State
agreed with the proposed modified remedy. A final design for the modified remedy was completed
in November 1992. The Lower Landfill was excavated and placed on the Upper Landfill in 1993.
It is anticipated that the capping of the Upper Landfill and the installation of a leachate collection
system will be completed in late 1995.
Site Facts: In 1987, the State of New York signed a Consent Order with the town of Conklin to
conduct a site study and to design and construct the cleanup remedy.
Environmental Progress
After adding this site to the National Priorities List, EPA performed preliminary investigations and
determined that no immediate actions were required at the Conklin Dumps site while final cleanup
actions are taking place.
November 1994 2 CONKLIN DUMPS
-------
CORTESE
LANDFILL
NEW YORK
EPA ID# NYD980528475
EPA REGION 2
Sullivan County
Tusten
Other Names:
Tusten Landfill
Site Description
The 5-acre Cortese Landfill site was operated from 1970 to 1981 by the John Cortese
Construction Company, receiving primarily municipal wastes at a rate of 3,000 cubic yards each
year. In addition, industrial wastes including waste solvents, paint thinners, paint sludges, and
waste oils were disposed of at the landfill in 1973. An estimated 5,000 to 8,000 drums are
believed to have been buried on the site at that time. The New York State Department of
Environmental Conservation found groundwater and surface water to be contaminated with
volatile organic chemicals (VOCs) and heavy metals. A municipal water supply well is located
about 1,500 feet from the site. Although it is not contaminated, the well has been taken out of
service as a precautionary measure. The former operator of the landfill and the Town of Tusten
each own part of the property. Approximately 550 people live within 1 mile of the site. Five
homes are located about 400 feet away from the landfill. The Delaware River, classified by the
National Park Service as a Wild and Scenic River, is located 450 feet from the landfill and is
used for fishing and recreational activities.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal, State, and potentially
responsible parties' actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 10/15/84
Final Date: 06/10/86
Threats and Contaminants
ffi
The groundwater, surface water, and soils are contaminated with various VOCs and
heavy metals. Because the municipal water well closest to the site was taken out of
service as a precaution, and because there are no private water wells in the area, there
is no chance that people would drink or come in contact with contaminated
groundwater. People who trespass on the site and come in contact with or accidentally
ingest contaminated surface water or surface soil may suffer adverse health effects. In
addition, if contaminants drain from the landfill into the Delaware River, people who
use the river for recreational activities may be at risk.
December 1994
-------
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in a long-term remedial phase focusing on cleanup of the entire site.
Response Action Status —
Entire Site: The potentially responsible parties, under EPA monitoring, have
conducted investigations to determine the nature and extent of groundwater, surface
water, soil and sediment contamination. In addition, the potential for site-related
contaminants to effect the surrounding ecology has been assessed. This investigative field work
was completed in the fall of 1994. The cleanup approach selected by EPA for this site includes:
removing the estimated 5,000 to 8,000 drums buried at two areas on the site; capping the 5-acre
landfill; installing drainage and stormwater runoff controls to prevent the migration of
contaminants; and constructing an extraction and treatment system to remove contaminants from
the groundwater. In addition, contaminants will be removed from two small lagoons south of the
landfill that had accepted contaminated sludge. The technical design for these activities is
expected to begin in late 1995.
Site Facts: In 1985, the State signed a Consent Order with a potentially responsible party, SCA
Services, Inc., which had transported wastes to the site. The lead for the site was transferred to
EPA in 1990 and a new Consent Order was signed with SCA. This new order required SCA to
undertake a remedial investigation at the site and further requires the development of remedial
alternatives, both under EPA oversight.
Environmental Progress
After adding this site to the NPL, the EPA performed preliminary investigations and determined
that no immediate actions were required at the Cortese Landfill site while cleanup activities are
being planned.
December 1994 2 CORTESE LANDFILL
-------
ENDICOTT
WELL FIELD
NEW YORK
EPA ID# NYD980780746
Site Description
EPA REGION 2
Broome County
Endicott
Other Names:
Ranney Well
The 100-acre Endicott Village Well Field site consists of the Ranney Well water supply well and
the groundwater around it, the Endicott Sewage Treatment Plant, the open land area associated
with the En-Joie Golf Club, the Erie-Lackawanna Railroad tracks, two small landfills, and the
Endicott Landfill, which is identified as the source of contamination. During a routine inspection
in the spring of 1981, the Ranney Well was sampled by EPA and found to contain vinyl chloride
and trace amounts of other volatile organic compounds (VOCs). The Village operates four wells
for 45,000 people, and the Ranney Well supplies approximately half of the total drinking water
of the system.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal and potentially responsible
parties' actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 10/01/84
Final Date: 06/01/86
Threats and Contaminants
The groundwater and soil are contaminated with various VOCs. The primary VOCs
identified are chloroethane, 1,2-dichloroethene, and vinyl chloride. Golf course ponds
contain elevated levels of various VOCs. The major health threat from the Endicott
Well Field site is drinking contaminated water. The Susquehanna River and
Nanticoke Creek, which run along either side of the site, and the golf course ponds
are prone to flooding, which could lead to the accumulation of contaminants in the
water and in the sediments. However, surface water and sediment samples collected
from these medias showed no significant concentrations of VOCs.
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in four stages: initial actions and three long-term remedial phases
focusing on cleanup of the public water supply, containment of the groundwater plume, and
controlling the source of contamination.
November 1994
-------
Response Action Status
Initial Action: In 1983, the Endicott Public Works Department installed diffused
operation equipment in the Ranney Well to air strip VOCs from the groundwater. In
1984, a purge well was installed to capture the contaminant plume before it impacted
the Ranney Well. In addition, a fence was erected around the Ranney Well as a security
measure.
Public Water Supply: In 1987, EPA selected the following methods for cleanup of
the public water supply: installing and operating an air stripper to remove VOCs from
the well; treating contaminated groundwater, with discharge to the village of Endicott
Municipal Water Distribution System; continuing operation of the existing purge well located
between the well and the Endicott Landfill; monitoring groundwater; and providing operation and
maintenance of the site after cleanup is completed. The additional air stripper has been in
operation since 1992.
Groundwater Plume Containment: The parties potentially responsible for the
site contamination, under EPA oversight, completed site investigations in 1992 and
identified cleanup remedies to restore the aquifer and control the surface source of
contamination. Studies were undertaken in two phases. In 1991, based on Phase I studies of the
entire site, an interim remedy was selected, which includes upgrading the existing purge well
system by installing and operating an additional purge well to intercept the contamination plume,
implementing a purge well monitoring program, and performing a detailed aquifer pump test.
The design of the remedy is expected to be completed late in 1994.
Source Control: EPA selected the source control remedy in 1992 based on Phase
II of the site study. The remedy includes capping the landfill, installing a gas
venting system, controlling and treating the leachate seep, monitoring the air and
groundwater quality, installing a fence around the landfill, and implementing institutional controls
to restrict future use of the landfill. The remedy design is expected to be completed in late 1995.
Site Facts: In 1988, a Consent Order was signed with three of the parties potentially
responsible for site contamination to perform a study to determine the source and extent of the
aquifer contamination. A Consent Decree also was signed in which the parties agreed to perform
the cleanup of the well field. In 1991, EPA and the responsible parties negotiated a second
Consent Decree for installation of the additional purge well. On January 14, 1993 EPA mailed
out notice letters to the responsible parties to ask if they were interested in designing and
performing the remedy for the source of contamination that EPA selected in 1992. A Consent
Decree to conduct these activities was signed by the potentially responsible parties in September
1993. The work plan for the design and construction of the source control cleanup activities was
submitted to EPA in February 1994.
November 1994 2 ENDICOTT VILLAGE WELL FIELD
-------
Environmental Progress
Initial actions taken to treat the groundwater reduced the risk of exposure to contaminants
through the water supply. After adding this site to the NPL, EPA performed preliminary
investigations and determined that with site security measures in place, no other immediate
actions were required at the Endicott Village Well Field site. The air stripper has been in
operation since 1992. EPA approved the preliminary design for the additional purge well in mid-
1992 and expects to approve the final design by late 1994. The treatment of iron in the
groundwater prior to discharge became a major issue and resulted in a delay for the final design
submittal.
ENDICOTT VILLAGE WELL FIELD
November 1994
-------
FACET
ENTERPRISES
INC.
NEW YORK
EPA ID# NYD073675514
Site Description
EPA REGION 2
Chemung County
Elmira Heights
From 1929 to 1976, the 39-acre Facet Enterprises, Inc. site was owned and operated by the
Bendix Corporation, which manufactured various products including bicycle parts, automobile
engine components, and small arms during World War II. In 1976, Facet Enterprises, Inc. was
created to carry on the manufacturing of engine components. In 1990, Facet Enterprises, Inc.
changed its name to the Purolator Products Company; however, Facet Enterprises, Inc. remains
the site name. Disposal of waste materials on the plant property is known to have occurred since
at least the 1940s through 1978. The site contains numerous disposal areas, including eight dump
sites and two open sludge disposal areas. Wastes disposed of at the site include cyanide salts,
heavy metal sludges, spent solvents, and various oils. In addition to the eight known disposal
areas, the open, flat area to the northwest of Plant 2 has been used for material storage
throughout the plant's operating history. On-site disposal of wastes was discontinued by Facet in
1978. The site is adjacent to a residential area and is less than 200 feet from the nearest home.
Nearby wells, which supply drinking water for more than 10,000 people, have been closed due to
contamination by trichloroethylene (TCE). There are approximately 1,000 people living within a
1/4-mile radius of the site, and six schools are located within a mile of the site.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal and potentially responsible
parties' actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 10/23/81
Final Date: 09/08/83
Threats and Contaminants
Volatile organic compounds (VOCs), inorganics, and petroleum were detected in
on-site monitoring wells and surface water, and the Elmira Water Board Sullivan
Street public water supply wells have been contaminated with TCE. Heavy metals
were found in the ditch sediments in 1981. Sampling has detected heavy metals and
polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in the soil on site as well as in surface soils at an oil
lagoon. A sample of sludge taken from the inactive sludge disposal area showed
elevated levels of the heavy metals cadmium, chromium, and copper. Nearby wells
have been closed due to the TCE contamination, thereby reducing the potential for
individuals to drink the contaminated water. However, individuals drinking the
contaminated groundwater from either the Facet's process well or the Elmira Water
Board's Sullivan Street supply wells may be at risk. People coming in direct contact
with surface water and sediments in the ditches may also be at risk, and runoff from
the site to the ditches may be threatening the area creeks.
November 1994
-------
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in two phases: initial actions and a long-term remedial phase focusing
on cleanup of the entire site.
Response Action Status
Initial Actions: During the spring of 1992, 469 buried drums and over 2,000 cubic
yards of contaminated soils were excavated from four of the Disposal Areas. The
drums and soils were disposed of off site at a permitted facility.
Entire Site: Under EPA oversight, in 1983, Facet initiated a hydrogeological
investigation of the site, that confirmed groundwater contamination. In 1986, Facet
initiated an investigation to determine the extent of contamination at the site and to
identify alternatives for the cleanup. Based on a review of this study, the EPA determined that
additional field work was needed to determine the extent to which the disposal areas have
contributed to the groundwater contamination. A remedy for the site was chosen in 1992,
requiring excavation of soils and sediments which are contaminated at levels above the site-
specific clean-up levels, and installation of a groundwater pump and treat system. In 1993,
Purolator Products Company submitted draft work plans to EPA for the cleanup design. The
work plans have been reviewed and commented on by EPA, and field work required to complete
the design is scheduled to begin in 1994.
Site Facts: Facet signed a Consent Order in 1983 to conduct a hydrogeological investigation of
the site. Facet entered into an Administrative Order in 1986 to conduct an investigation to
determine the extent of the contamination and to identify alternatives for the cleanup. In June
1993, a Consent Decree between EPA and Purolator Products Company was entered in the
Western District Court of New York. The Consent Decree requires Purolator to design and
implement the cleanup actions required by the remedy selected in 1992, and to pay EPA's past
and future oversight costs, plus interest. EPA will conduct oversight of all work conducted
pursuant to the Consent Decree.
Environmental Progress
After adding this site to the NPL, the EPA performed preliminary investigations and determined
that, with nearby wells closed and the removal of buried drums as well as contaminated soil, no
other actions were required at the Facet Enterprises, Inc. site while final cleanup actions are
being planned.
November 1994 2 FACET ENTERPRISES, INC.
-------
FMC CORP.
(DUBLIN ROAD
LANDFILL)
NEW YORK
EPA ID#NYD000511857
Site Description
EPA REGION 2
Orleans County
Towns of Ridgeway and Shelby
The FMC Corporation's Dublin Road Site is an inactive waste site, a portion of which is located
in the Town of Ridgeway and a portion in the Town of Shelby. The 30-acre site is divided into
two areas by Dublin Road, creating a northern rectangular parcel of about 21 acres that contains
two inactive rock quarries and wooded property, and a southern parcel of about 9 acres
containing a waste pile, rectangular pond and a swamp. Since 1933, approximately 4 to 6 acres
of the south parcel were used to dispose of coal ash cinders, laboratory wastes consisting of glass
bottles and chemical residues, residues from lime sulfur filtration, building debris and residues
from pesticide production areas. These materials contained metals in the form of salts and
pesticides/insecticides. FMC stopped disposal activity at the site in 1968. The site is fenced and
posted with warning signs. The area surrounding the site is sparsely populated. Approximately
100 people live within a 1/2-mile radius of the site. The site is bounded by the New York State
Barge Canal and Jeddo Creek, both of which are used for recreational activities.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal, State, and potentially
responsible parties' actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 10/15/84
Final Date: 06/10/86
Threats and Contaminants
The groundwater, waste pile area, swamp, pond, and quarry soils are contaminated
with heavy metals including lead, mercury, and arsenic, as well as a variety of
pesticides. The site poses a potential health threat to area residents who use private
wells located downgradient from the site. Accidental ingestion or direct contact with
the contaminants may also pose a health threat.
December 1994
-------
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in a long-term remedial phase focusing on cleanup of the entire site.
Response Action Status
Entire Site: The parties potentially responsible for the site contamination, under State
supervision, have investigated the nature and extent of the groundwater, surface
water, soils and sediment contamination at the site. The investigation was completed
in 1991, including treatability studies conducted by the potentially responsible parties. An
analysis of cleanup alternatives was completed in late 1992 and the results presented at a public
meeting in early 1993. The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, after
considering the most appropriate remedies for site cleanup, selected the remedy for the site in the
spring of 1993. The remedy includes: excavation and treatment of the soils and sediments; on-site
landfill for contaminated wastes; and, pumping and treating contaminated groundwater.
Construction began in the spring of 1994, and is expected to be completed in 1996.
Site Facts: The State issued a Consent Order requiring the potentially responsible parties to
conduct an investigation into the nature and extent of contamination at the site, to monitor the
movement of contaminants, and to take necessary cleanup actions to address the site
contamination.
Environmental Progress
After adding this site to the NPL, the EPA performed preliminary investigations and determined
that, with site security measures in place, no immediate actions were required at the FMC Corp.
(Dublin Road Landfill) site while further studies into the final cleanup remedies are taking place.
December 1994 2 FMC CORP. (DUBLIN ROAD LANDFILL)
-------
FOREST GLEN
MOBILE HOME
SUBDIVISION
NEW YORK
EPA ID# NYD981560923
EPA REGION 2
Niagara County
Niagara Falls
Other Names:
Forest Glen Mobile Home Park
Site Description
The Forest Glen Mobile Home Subdivision site consists of 21-acres, including an 11-acre mobile
home park that previously was used as a landfill for chemical wastes. Drums and other chemical
wastes also were disposed of in the adjacent areas of the trailer park. In 1980, soil contaminated
with phenolic resins was shipped to an off-site landfill for disposal. A synthetic plastic liner
covers one of the spots where high concentrations of contaminants were found. Approximately
150 people lived in the Forest Glen Subdivision. The area surrounding the site is used for
residential and commercial purposes. Vacant land, which is heavily vegetated, is located to the
north and east of the site. The mobile home park is serviced by a public water system. East Gill
Creek flows along the edge of the trailer park.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 08/16/89
Final Date: 11/21/89
Threats and Contaminants
Soils on site are contaminated with various phenolic resins. Soils contaminated with
polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) were found mainly in the eastern portion of
the site. There was a potential risk to human health from accidentally ingesting or
touching contaminated soils. Residents of the trailer park could have been exposed to
high levels of contamination through normal work or play activities. There also is a
potential for contamination of public water supply lines resulting from the failure or
corrosion of the pipes and the interaction with buried chemicals. The trailer park
floods during periods of spring snowmelt, which presents a moderate potential for
contaminants to move to drainage ditches that surround the site.
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in three stages: immediate actions and two long-term remedial phases
focusing on permanent relocation of the affected residents and cleanup of the entire site.
November 1994
-------
Response Action Status
Immediate Actions: The EPA temporarily relocated 27 families before the site
was listed on the NPL, covered the site with concrete, and placed a high-visibility
fence around the contaminated areas. Two "hot spot" areas were identified and were
temporarily covered.
Permanent Relocation: In 1989, the EPA selected a remedy for the site that
involved permanent relocation of site residents. The remedy also included a
continuation of the temporary relocation program, during the permanent relocation
process. The relocation process was completed in December 1992. A fence surrounds the
perimeter of the site, preventing access to the site.
Entire Site: Field work to determine the extent and the source of contamination has
begun and is expected to be completed in early 1996. Final cleanup remedies will be
selected based on the results of this investigation.
Site Facts: Area residents were concerned about the potential health effects resulting from
contact with chemical contamination of site soils. EPA relocated 53 families who resided at the
site.
Environmental Progress
The EPA has relocated 53 affected families since the site was placed on the NPL and has
determined that it is not safe for families to return to the site. The permanent relocation of
families, in addition to the site security, has eliminated the potential for exposure to hazardous
materials at the site while the EPA plans final cleanup activities.
November 1994 2 FOREST GLEN MOBILE HOME
SUBDIVISION
-------
FULTON
TERMINALS
NEW YORK
EPA ID# NYD9805930
Site Description
EPA REGION 2
Oswego County
Fulton
Millions of gallons of waste oils and sludges have been stored in tanks at the 1 1/2-acre Fulton
Terminals site, which is now inactive. From 1936 to 1960, the primary activity on the site was
the manufacturing of roofing materials, which involved the storage of asphalt in aboveground
tanks and fuel oil storage in underground tanks. From 1972 to 1977, the site was used as a
staging and storage area for materials scheduled for incineration at the Pollution Abatement
Services site, which also is on the National Priorities List. From 1981 to 1983, Fulton Terminals
removed several tanks as part of a voluntary cleanup program. These activities ceased in 1983
after the facility was fined by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation for
improper disposal of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). The site is an urban area, with
approximately 13,000 people living within 3 miles. The site is within 50 feet of the Oswego
River, which is used for recreation.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal and potentially responsible par-
ties' actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 12/30/82
Final Date: 09/08/83
Threats and Contaminants
The ground water, soil, and sediments are contaminated with heavy metals including
arsenic, barium, chromium, and lead, as well as volatile organic compounds (VOCs).
Trespassers on this fenced site face potential health threats in the event that direct
contact with the contaminated soil or groundwater occurs within the restricted site.
Local residents use a municipal water supply and, therefore, are not likely to come
into contact with contaminants in the groundwater. The Oswego River, located
adjacent to the site, is subject to contamination by runoff from the site and could pose
potential health threats during recreational use of the water.
November 1994
-------
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in two stages: initial actions and a long-term remedial phase focusing
on cleanup of the entire site.
Response Action Status
Initial Actions: Actions conducted in 1986 by EPA and the potentially responsible
parties consisted of constructing a 7-foot perimeter fence around the site and posting
warning signs, removing two aboveground tanks and two underground tanks,
removing approximately 300 cubic yards of visibly-contaminated soil and tar-like wastes, and
excavating storm drains that were acting as a conduit for contaminated runoff entering the
Oswego River during storms. An additional removal action in 1990 involved the construction of
earthen barriers for the prevention of surface runoff from the contaminated portion of the site.
Entire Site: In 1989, following the completion of a site investigation to determine
the nature and extent of the contamination at, and emanating from the site, a remedy
for the site was selected. Actions selected by EPA for site cleanup include low
temperature thermal extraction to remove VOC from the soils and the use of carbon adsorption to
collect the pollutants from the groundwater, followed by the reinjection of the treated water. The
engineering design of the cleanup actions began in late 1991. Confirmatory sampling of the
contaminated area conducted during the initial stages of the engineering design revealed additional
VOC contamination in the silt and clay portion of the soil below the water table. Accordingly,
the scope of the engineering design for the cleanup of the soil was expanded to include the
contaminated silt and clay. The design was completed in the fall of 1994. The soil cleanup is
expected to begin in the spring of 1995. The engineering design for the cleanup of the
groundwater is expected to be completed in early 1995. The groundwater cleanup is expected to
begin in the fall of 1995, following the completion of the soil cleanup.
Site Facts: In 1986, the potentially responsible parties signed a Consent Order requiring them
to perform removal activities. A Consent Decree was signed by the potentially responsible parties
in 1990, in which they agreed to perform the site cleanup as directed by EPA. The Consent
Decree became effective in December 1991.
Environmental Progress
Removing contaminated materials and restricting site access has reduced the potential for
exposure to contaminated runoff or hazardous materials from the site, pending the completion of
final cleanup activities at the Fulton Terminals site.
November 1994 2 FULTON TERMINALS
-------
GCL TIE & TREATIN
INCORPORATED
NEW YORK
EPA ID# NYD981566417
EPA REGION 2
Delaware County
Village of Sidney
Site Description
The GCL Tie and Treating Inc. (GCL) site is a 26-acre, inactive mill and wood treating plant
located in the Village of Sidney. The GCL property has been used as a railroad tie manufactur-
ing and treating plant since the I940's. Logs were cut and pressure-treated with creosote.
Several potential waste sources, including areas of contaminated soil and tanks containing
creosote, are located on the site. In 1986, the New York State Department of Environmental
Conservation (NYSDEC) investigated the site when a pressure tank malfunctioned, allowing
approximately 30,000 gallons of creosote to spill onto the soil. The soil was excavated by GCL
and placed in a mound near the main building, where it is still located. Unspecified quantities of
creosote-contaminated material previously added to the soil mound were removed and deposited
in adjacent wetlands. Former GCL employees have submitted affidavits stating that it was
standard operating procedure to dispose of creosote-contaminated material in wetlands adjacent to
the site. Operations continued until 1987, when the site was abandoned. The site has remained
inactive since that time. In October 1990, EPA collected samples from various potential waste
sources on the site including contaminated soil, a debris pile, and aboveground storage tanks.
Land use around the site is primarily industrial and commercial; however, residential areas are
located within 1 mile of the site. Approximately 1,100 people are employed in the nearby
industrial area. A shopping plaza, consisting of three fast food restaurants and several stores, is
located approximately 300 feet from the site. About 5,000 people live within 2 miles of the site
and depend on groundwater as their potable water supply; the nearest well is within 1/2 mile of
the site. The site drains by overland flow to the Susquehanna River through an unnamed
tributary.
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through
federal and state actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 01/18/94
September 1994
-------
Threats and Contaminants
The soil is contaminated with creosote constituents such as anthracene, chrysene,
benzo(a)anthracene, and benzo(a)pyrene. Two mounds of approximately 4,800 cubic
yards of creosote-contaminated soil and 3,000 cubic yards of wood debris are found
on site. Several aboveground tanks and drums containing approximately 20,000
gallons of creosote wastes and sludges also are found on site. Touching or ingesting
contaminated soil or hazardous waste could pose a health threat. The river is a
documented fishery and recreational area, but it is not used for drinking water in the
vicinity of the site.
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in three stages: immediate actions and two long-term remedial phases
focusing on cleanup of the soil and non-GCL property.
Response Action Status
Immediate Actions: In mid-1991, the EPA installed a chain link fence, identified
and disposed of containerized and uncontainerized hazardous wastes, prepared 4,800
cubic yards of contaminated soil and 3,000 cubic yards of wood debris for disposal,
and developed a pilot study to determine the effectiveness of composting to bioremediate
creosote-containing soils.
Soil: An investigation of the nature and extent of soil contamination is underway.
This investigation is expected to be completed by the Fall of 1994, at which time the
EPA will select the final remedy to address soil contamination.
Non-GCL Property: An investigation of the nature and extent of potential off-site
soil, surface water, and groundwater contamination began in late 1993. The EPA
plans to complete the study by early 1995, at which time a final cleanup remedy will
be selected.
Site Facts: The property was purchased by Railcon Materials Inc. and Railcon Wood Products
Inc. in 1979. In 1983, Railcon formed the corporation known as GCL Tie and Treating Inc.
GCL operated until 1987 when they filed for bankruptcy and Railcon regained control of the
operation. Railcon sold all inventory and equipment, and abandoned the site. The site has
remained inactive and current ownership is being investigated. Both EPA and the New York
State Department of Environmental Conservation initiated criminal investigations at the site for
environmental violations. The GCL site was selected as a pilot project for the Superfund
Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM). Under this pilot, work which had typically been per-
formed sequentially is being performed in parallel. While determining if the site should be
eligible for the NPL, the EPA is performing investigations to further delineate the nature and
extent of contamination at the site and evaluating the effectiveness of composting as a means of
treating creosote-contaminated soil.
September 1994 2 GCL TIE & TREATING
-------
Environmental Progress
The immediate actions undertaken by the EPA have reduced threats to public health and
environment while further site studies are underway.
Site Repository
Not yet established.
GCL TIE & TREATING
September 1994
-------
GE MOREAU
NEW YORK
EPA ID# NYD98052833
EPA REGION 2
Saratoga County
South Glens Falls
Other Names:
Caputo Disposal Site
Site Description
From 1958 to 1968, an evaporative pit at the 40-acre GE Moreau site received an estimated 452
tons of waste material generated by the General Electric Company. The waste materials include
trichloroethylene (TCE), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), spent solvents, oils, sludges, and
other miscellaneous wastes. In 1982, elevated levels of TCE were found in the on-site
groundwater. Soils were found to be contaminated with PCBs. Contaminated groundwater
discharges at Reardon Brook, which runs within 7,000 feet of the site and feeds the Village of
Fort Edward reservoir. Approximately 14,300 people are served by the groundwater system in
this semi-rural area. Nearby streams, rivers, and the reservoir, used as recreational areas, have
been affected by the groundwater contamination.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal and potentially responsible
parties' actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 12/01/82
Final Date: 09/01/83
Threats and Contaminants
The groundwater and surface water were contaminated with volatile organic
compounds (VOCs). The soil was contaminated with VOCs and PCBs. People could
have been at risk it they touched or accidentally ingested contaminated soil or water.
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in two stages: initial actions and a long-term remedial phase focusing
on cleanup of the entire site.
December 1994
-------
Response Action Status
Initial Actions: As a result of GE's testing program, activated carbon filter systems
were installed in homes contaminated with VOCs, as a temporary measure. GE
performed many other tasks, including installation of a permanent alternative water
supply system for approximately 100 homes, construction of a slurry wall and cap to contain
contaminants at the source, excavation of PCB-contaminated soil, and treatment of contaminated
groundwater. In 1985, GE installed treatment units in private wells downgradient of the site.
Entire Site: The methods approved by the EPA to clean up the site included: using
the slurry wall and cap constructed around the disposal area in 1984 and 1985 to
contain the source of groundwater contamination; continuing to monitor 18
downgradient wells to determine the effectiveness of the slurry wall and monitoring at 33 wells to
determine if changes are occurring in the size and direction of the plume; continuing treatment of
the plume by air stripping where it exits at Reardon Brook; removing 8,600 cubic yards of
PCB-contaminated soil adjacent to the disposal site and placing the soil within the slurry wall;
providing a public water supply for affected residences; and reviewing the cleanup action at least
every five years to assure that human health and the environment are protected. Cleanup actions
at the site were completed hi 1990. In February 1994, EPA issued an Explanation of Significant
Differences (ESD) to the 1987 cleanup decision. The BSD requires the removal and treatment of
approximately 4.1 million gallons of water through an existing relief well inside the containment
system. This expected to be a two-year process, the first of which is already complete. This
enhancement will resume when the weather permits. In February 1994, EPA granted a waiver for
groundwater cleanup goals for the groundwater plume at the site. It was deemed impractical to
achieve the standard required cleanup levels within a reasonable tune period. EPA has completed
a Five-Year Review and concluded that the containment system enhancement scheduled to resume
in the spring of 1995 and the continued air stripping at Readon Brook are sufficiently protective
of human health and the environment. Monitoring will be continued to ensure the effectiveness of
the remedy.
Site Facts: The EPA filed a lawsuit against the Town of Moreau to gam access to property
controlled or owned by the Town so that GE could install water mains and provide individual
hookups to the Village of South Glens Falls public water supply system. The alternative water
supply system was completed in 1990.
Environmental Progress
The containment system enhancement is scheduled to resume in the spring of 1995 and take one
more year to complete. All other cleanup actions have been implemented at the GE Moreau site.
The site no longer poses a threat to nearby residents and the environment. GE will continue to
monitor the site and EPA will review site conditions every five years to ensure the continued
effectiveness of the cleanup remedies.
December 1994 2 February 1994
-------
GENERAL
MOTORS {CE
FOUNDRY DIVI
NEW YORK
EPA ID# NYD091972554
EPA REGION 2
St. Lawrence County
Massena
Other Names:
G.M. Massena
Site Description
The 270-acre General Motors (Central Foundry Division) site originally was built to produce
aluminum cylinder heads for the Chevrolet Corvair and has been in operation since 1958. From
1959 to 1974, the plant used polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) as a component of (he hydraulic
fluids in its die casting process. General Motors (GM) no longer uses die casting in its processes.
In the early 1960s, GM installed a reclamation system to recover used hydraulic fluid. PCB
sludges periodically were landfilled in on-site areas and also remain in the bottoms of several
lagoons. The site contains approximately 850,000 cubic yards of PCB-contaminated material. On
the GM facility, contamination is located in two disposal areas, called the North Disposal Area
and the East Disposal Area, as well as the Industrial Landfill, and four Industrial Lagoons. The
Industrial Landfill also was used for the disposal of foundry sand, excavated soil, and other solid
industrial wastes. In 1971, approximately 800,000 gallons of PCB-contaminated sludge were
removed from two Industrial Lagoons and were deposited in the North Disposal Area. From
1973 to 1975, GM again removed PCB-contaminated sludge from the Lagoons and transferred it
to a sludge settling basin in the East Disposal Area. Miscellaneous soils on the facility also are
contaminated with PCBs. The site is bordered by the St. Lawrence River, the St. Regis Mohawk
Reservation, the Raquette River, the Reynolds Metals Company, and the St. Lawrence Seaway
Development Corporation. The St. Regis Mohawk Indians live adjacent to the plant. The City of
Cornwall, Ontario, with approximately 50,000 residents, is 2 miles north across the river, and
the Village of Massena, with a population of 13,000, is located 7 miles to the east.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal and potentially responsible
parties' actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 09/08/83
Final Date: 09/21/84
November 1994
-------
Threats and Contaminants
"-VV
PCBs were found in several monitoring wells on the eastern side of the facility and in
on-site soil and sediment samples from the St. Lawrence River. Volatile organic
compounds (VOCs) were found in groundwater directly under the site and off site.
Due to past wastewater discharges into surface water, St. Lawrence and Raquette
River sediments have been contaminated with PCBs. In addition, soil and sediment on
the St. Regis Mohawk Reservation has been contaminated by runoff from the site. The
consumption of fish or wildlife from contaminated areas is of special concern because
of the proximity of the Mohawk Indian Reservation. Fishing is restricted by the State
Health Department and the Indian Reservation Administration. Runoff potentially
threatens the Raquette River, the St. Lawrence River, and the St. Regis Indian
Reservation. Individuals ingesting or touching contaminated surface water,
groundwater, soil, sludges, or sediments potentially are at risk. Public water supply
systems are not contaminated.
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in three stages: immediate actions and two long-term remedial phases
focusing on cleanup of the North Disposal Area, river sediments, the lagoons, and facility soils
and groundwater; and cleanup of the Industrial Landfill and East Disposal Area.
Response Action Status
Immediate Actions: GM, under the EPA's oversight, agreed to place a temporary
cap on the Industrial Landfill in 1987 to prevent the migration of contaminants from
the Landfill.
North Disposal Area, River Sediments, Lagoons, Soils, and Groundwater:
The final cleanup remedy that was selected by the EPA in 1990 includes dredging
and excavating contaminated materials, followed by on-site treatment and disposal of
residual contamination using biological treatment or other innovative technologies, and
groundwater extraction and treatment. GM began the design of the remedy in the summer of
1992 and is expected to complete it in 1996. Design sampling began in the summer of 1993 and
the first phase of cleanup actions, including river dredging, is expected to begin soon.
Industrial Landfill and East Disposal Area: The final cleanup remedy that was
selected by the EPA in 1992 includes excavating highly contaminated materials from
the East Disposal Area followed by on-site treatment and disposal of residual
contamination using biological treatment or other innovative technologies, capping the Industrial
Landfill and less contaminated material in the East Disposal Area, and containing groundwater.
GM began the design of this remedy in the summer of 1992, and is expected to complete it in
1996. The first phase of cleanup actions is expected to begin soon.
November 1994 2 GENERAL MOTORS
(CENTRAL FOUNDRY DIVISION)
-------
Site Facts: The EPA and GM negotiated a Consent Order in 1985 requiring GM to conduct an
investigation into the type and extent of contamination at the site. In March 1992, EPA issued a
Unilateral Administrative Order to GM requiring GM to undertake design and implementation of
the final remedy for the North Disposal Area, River Sediments, Lagoons, Soils, and
Groundwater. In August 1992, EPA issued a second Unilateral Administrative Order to GM
requiring GM to undertake design and implementation of the final remedy for the East Disposal
Area and Industrial Landfill. GM is currently complying with both Orders.
Environmental Progress
By capping the Industrial Landfill, the potential for further contamination of the General Motors
(Central Foundry Division) site and risk from exposure to hazardous materials has been reduced
while the selected final cleanup activities are being designed.
GENERAL MOTORS (CENTRAL FOUNDRY DIVISION) 3
November 1994
-------
GENZALE PLATING^R EPA REGION 2
_T A Nassau County
COMPANY f^ V \ A_J Franklin Scluare on Lon9 ls|and
NEW YORK
EPA ID# NYD002050110
Site Description
The 1/2-acre Genzale Plating Company site comprises a two-story office/metal plating facility,
two on-site residences, and a backyard area, which contains leaching pits, storage buildings, and
various chemical storage facilities. Since 1915, the facility has electroplated small products such
as automobile antennas, parts of ball point pens, and bottle openers and is known to have
discharged wastewater containing heavy metals into three leaching pools at the rear of the site.
This procedure continued into the late 1950s, when the facility was connected to the municipal
sewer system; wastewater was then discharged into either the sewer system or the on-site
leaching pits. In 1981, the Nassau County Health Department ordered the company to stop the
discharge. In 1982, the company hauled sludge from the pools and some contaminated soil away
from the site, but the cleanup was never completed. The New York State Department of
Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) conducted an investigation of the Genzale site in 1983 to
determine the potential threat to public health posed by potential off-site migration of
contaminants into the groundwater. As a result of this investigation, the site was added to the
NPL. The site is situated in a densely populated residential area. Soil on the site is permeable,
thus threatening a Franklin Square Water District well located 1,700 feet downgradient of the
site. The district supplies water to approximately 20,000 people. Another 32,000 people are
supplied by West Hempstead-Hempstead Water District wells within 3 miles of the site.
o- r, -u-i- -ru v AA A *, v, NPL LISTING HISTORY
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through proposed Date. 06/01/86
Federal actions.
Threats and Contaminants
Final Date: 07/01/87
Chromium, cadmium, and nickel were detected in on-site groundwater; however,
routine monitoring of public water supplies in the area has not identified any drinking
water contamination. The soils on-site are contaminated also with heavy metals, most
notably chromium and nickel. The exposure pathways of concern are direct contact
with on-site soils and the potential for drinking water contamination. The site is above
Long Island's sole-source aquifers for municipal and private water supplies.
November 1994
-------
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in three stages: initial actions and two long-term response actions
focusing on cleanup of the on-site soils and groundwater, and downgradient groundwater.
Response Action Status
Initial Actions: In 1982, the potentially responsible party partially completed sludge
removal and backfilling of the leaching pits with soils.
Site Soils and Groundwater: In 1988, the EPA initiated the first phase of an
investigation to develop data on the degree of contamination at the site and to
determine the nature and extent of the problem. Three clusters of groundwater
monitoring wells, each consisting of a shallow and deep well, were installed on the site. Two
off-site monitoring wells were installed downgradient of the site to determine whether there had
been any off-site migration of contaminants. In early 1991, a remedy was selected, which
includes treating contaminated soils by vacuum extraction, excavating contaminated soils on the
property and in the leaching pits and transporting them off site for further treatment and disposal,
and backfilling the excavated areas with clean soil. Interim groundwater treatment involves
pumping and treating the extracted groundwater by air stripping. The treated water then will be
reinjected into the ground. The design of the selected remedies was completed in 1994. Cleanup
activities began in the fall of 1994 and are expected to be completed in 1996.
Downgradient Groundwater: Based on the results of the initial investigation, a
second investigation is being conducted to study off-site groundwater contamination
downgradient of the site and to develop and evaluate potential remedies to address
this contamination. Field work for this investigation was initiated in February of 1994. It is
expected that the off-site groundwater investigation will be completed in 1995.
Environmental Progress
After adding the Genzale Plating site to the NPL, EPA conducted an initial evaluation and
determined that no immediate actions are needed. Although there is no present danger to the
drinking water, the EPA will ensure the safety of the water supply in the site area through
implementation of the groundwater treatment system.
November 1994 2 GENZALE PLATING COMPANY
-------
GOLDISC ef EPA REGION 2
V3UL.UIOU Ltf^Sl SuffolkCounty
RECORDINGS,
INC.
NEW YORK
EPA ID# NYD980768717
Site Description
The Goldisc Recordings, Inc. site is situated on 34 acres of land, including 6 acres of buildings,
in an industrial section of Long Island. The company produced phonograph records from 1968 to
1983. Wastes generated at the site include large quantities of nickel-plating wastes and hydraulic
oil and lesser quantities of solvents. Plating wastes were stored in aboveground storage tanks. On
several occasions, the Suffolk County Department of Health discovered chemical wastes in storm
drains, holding ponds, and an on-site dump. In addition, the County found Goldisc was
discharging plating wastes into an adjoining marsh. Contaminants have seeped into the aquifer
beneath the site. Suffolk County found that wastes containing nickel, copper, iron, cadmium,
zinc, lead, and chromium were spilled or leaked onto a paved area of the site. The former
owner, First Holbrook Company, cleaned the on-site holding ponds and installed monitoring
wells. Approximately 19,500 people live within a mile of the site; 70,500 people live within 3
miles. There also are several schools within a mile of the site. Approximately 130 wells located
within 3 miles of the site serve 71,000 people. A public water supply well is 1,000 feet
dowrigrauient of the site. Groundwater is the only source of water supply in the area.
o- r, -,_•••* -PU- • • u • ^ A ^ u NPL LISTING HISTORY
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through Proposed Date: 10/01/84
Final Date: 06/01/86
Federal, State, and action by potentially
responsible parties' actions.
Threats and Contaminants
ZEJ
Groundwater is contaminated with volatile organic compounds (VOCs), as well as
heavy metals including chromium, nickel, and lead. Some contaminant plumes have
been tentatively identified. Soil is contaminated with heavy metals, including copper,
cadmium, and zinc. A waste holding pool on-site, containing VOCs, has been
cleaned. Underground structures are contaminated with heavy metals as well as
various VOCs. Area residents are served by a public water supply system. Ingestion
of some site soils may pose a health hazard. There is a potential threat to a nearby
wetlands area, the closest surface water discharge point to the site.
November 1994
-------
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in a long-term remedial phase focusing on cleanup of the entire site.
Response Action Status
Entire Site: Under an EPA Consent Order, ElectroSound Group, Inc., also known
as Goldisc Recordings, Inc., is currently performing a site investigation to determine
the extent of the contamination of groundwater, soil, and structures at the site.
Sampling data is being reviewed by EPA and the New York State Department of Environmental
Conservation. The study is expected to be completed in late 1995, at which time alternative
measures to clean up the site will be recommended and the final remedy will be selected by EPA.
Site Facts: The State of New York issued a number of Administrative Orders on Consent
(AOCs) to ElectroSound between 1979 and 1981 related to violations of County and State health
codes. In compliance with a 1988 State AOC and under State and EPA supervision, ElectroSound
began conducting a study to measure the extent of contamination at the site. ElectroSound,
however, did not complete the study as outlined in the AOC. In August 1990, the site lead
transferred to EPA. An AOC between EPA and ElectroSound to perform the investigation was
executed on June 27, 1991. The ElectroSound is currently proceeding with the study under this
AOC.
Environmental Progress
After adding this site to the NPL, EPA performed preliminary investigations and determined that
no immediate actions were required at the Goldisc Recordings, Inc. site while further
investigations into the selection of final cleanup actions are taking place.
November 1994 2 GOLDISC RECORDINGS, INC.
-------
GRIFFISS AIR
FORCE BASE
NEW YORK
EPA ID# NY4571924451
Site Description
EPA REGION 2
Oneida County
miles northeast of Rome
The Griffiss Air Force Base site, in operation since 1943, covers 110 acres on a 3,900-acre
parcel of land and is home to the 416th Combat Support Group under the Air Combat Command.
Various wastes, including solvents and lead from battery acids, were generated from research and
development activities in the industrial shops and laboratories. These wastes were disposed of in
landfills and dry wells. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) have been detected in groundwater
on the base. In 1985 and 1986, the Air Force removed several underground storage tanks and
excavated contaminated soil. Additional underground storage tanks were removed in 1988 and
1989. The Air Force also modified a landfill cover. The area immediately surrounding the base is
primarily agricultural, with a few residential areas. The City of Rome is southwest of the base
and has a population of 50,000. About 95% of the local population obtains water from the
municipal water supply system. The source of this supply is surface water upstream from the
base; however, some private wells are used to irrigate crops. The Town of Floyd, a community
of over 300 homes southeast of the base, has received its water from private wells. The base is
located in the Mohawk River Valley and is situated among the Mohawk River, Six Mile Creek,
and the New York State Barge Canal (Erie Canal).
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 11/01/84
Final Date: 07/01/87
Threats and Contaminants
Groundwater is contaminated with VOCs. Private water wells, used for irrigation and
drinking water in the Town of Floyd, have been contaminated with VOCs and
ethylene glycol. Soil is contaminated with heavy metals including lead, chromium, and
barium, as well as polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). Ethylene glycol has been found
in Six Mile Creek. Contaminants may accumulate in food crops and pose a health
hazard to those who eat them. In addition, people who touch or accidentally ingest the
contaminated soil may suffer adverse health effects. Leachate from one of the base's
landfills has seeped into Six Mile Creek, which may be harmful to wildlife.
November 1994
-------
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in two stages: immediate actions and a long-term remedial phase
focusing on cleanup of the entire site.
Response Action Status
Immediate Actions: Underground storage tanks were removed from the base, and
contaminated soil was excavated between 1985 and 1989. A program to remove or
replace all tanks on base as needed is currently underway. Three additional areas of
concern are now being defined for additional removal actions. In 1990, the Air Force began
providing bottled water for residents affected by the contaminated wells and has provided funds
to the community to construct an extension of the municipal water supply to replace the
contaminated wells. Connections to the water supply extension were available by late 1991 and
most affected residents have taken advantage of the service.
Entire Site: Griffiss Air Force Base will conduct a study to determine the extent of
contamination to the groundwater, soil, and the rest of the base. Thirty-four areas of
concern have been identified, including landfills and dry wells. Additional areas of
concern have been discovered and are being defined at this time. Once the study is completed,
expected during 1996 and 1997, cleanup measures will be recommended and the EPA will select
the most appropriate remedies for site cleanup.
Site Facts: An Interagency Agreement among the EPA, the State, and Griffiss Air Force Base
to clean up the site was signed in June 1990. The public is especially concerned about the
contamination of the Floyd wells. The Air Force agreed to provide bottled water and to fund
replacement municipal water distribution. Griffiss Air Force Base has been designated to close
under the Base Realignment and Closure program. Plans for site reuse and acceleration of base
cleanup are under development, with public hearings and public comment periods scheduled for
early 1995.
Environmental Progress
The provision of safe drinking water to the residents of the Town of Floyd whose wells were
impacted, has eliminated the potential of exposure to hazardous substances in the water while
studies into the nature and extent of contamination at Griffiss
Air Force Base are being completed and cleanup remedies finalized.
November 1994 2 GRIFFISS AIR FORCE BASE
-------
HAVILAND COMPLEX EF* REGION 2
Dutchess County
NEW YORK r-^ n ^-T-I Town of Hyde Park
EPA ID# NYD980785661
Site Description
The 275-acre Haviland Complex site consists of a planned development that contains an
apartment complex, a junior high school, an elementary school, a shopping center, and a number
of private homes. In 1981, a local resident became concerned because his well water was
foaming. The Dutchess County Health Department found the septic and sewage systems of a
nearby car wash and laundromat had failed, contaminating the ground water with volatile organic
compounds (VOCs). In 1982, the laundromat installed a sand filter and a new tile field to handle
the laundry effluent. The State also began an investigation and, in 1983, ordered the laundromat
to disconnect the dry cleaning unit from the septic system and to dispose of all spent cleaning
fluids off site at a licensed disposal facility. All residents in the area were advised to use bottled
water. The wells servicing the Haviland Apartments and the laundromat had water treatment units
installed in 1984 and 1985 to remove contaminants. Hyde Park has an estimated population of
21,000 people. Approximately 20% of the population are connected to a public sewer system,
and over 50% are served by a public or private water supply system. The remaining population,
including the residences located on the site, obtain water from residential wells. Groundwater
discharges into Fall Kill Creek and to a nearby wetland.
e-* D -u-r* TU- •* • u • AA A*. v, NPL LISTING HISTORY
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through
Federal and State actions.
Proposed Date: 10/15/84
Final Date: 06/10/86
Threats and Contaminants
The groundwater is contaminated with various VOCs. The affected residents have had
household activated carbon treatment systems installed, which must be regularly
checked and maintained. To date, pollutants have not been found in Fall Kill Creek
or the nearby wetlands above drinking water standards.
November 1994
-------
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in two stages: immediate actions and a long-term phase focusing on
clean up of the entire site.
Response Action Status
Immediate Actions: The State installed carbon adsorption units in seven homes in
the affected area to remove contaminants from the water. These units have been
fully effective.
Entire Site: In 1987, the EPA selected a remedy to provide public water, clean the
source of contamination, and to extract and treat contaminated ground water. The
treated water will be discharged into Fall Kill Creek. In 1991, the EPA cleaned out
contaminated materials from the local septic disposal systems as the source control measure.
Presently, EPA is developing a plan with the Town of Hyde Park to provide a public water
system and to gather further data to evaluate the remainder of the remedial project. Because of
delays resulting from institutional and technical problems associated with hookup to the water
distribution system, EPA is reevaluating the selected remedy in terms of protectiveness and cost.
Environmental Progress
The installation of carbon units in homes affected by groundwater contamination and the
completion of the septic system cleanup have protected the residential water supplies and reduced
health threats from the Haviland Complex site.
November 1 994
HAVILAND COMPLEX
-------
HERTEL LANDFILL EPA REGION 2
/—\ r ] Ulster County
NEW YORK /^-_^CvM Platteki11
EPA ID# NYD980780779< J ^ Other Names:
Environmental Landfills, Inc.
Dutchess Sanitation
Site Description
The 80-acre Hertel Landfill site is an inactive waste disposal area that was established in 1963 as
a municipal waste landfill. Ten acres of the land were used when the landfill was operating. In
1970, Dutchess Sanitation Services, Inc. began hauling refuse from Dutchess County to the
Hertel Landfill. Dutchess Sanitation purchased the landfill in 1975. The Ulster County
Department of Health revoked the landfill permit in 1976 due to violations. Among them were
allegations of illegal industrial dumping. This action and a town ordinance prohibiting the
dumping of out-of-town garbage resulted in the permanent closing of the site in 1977. The State
detected heavy metals and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the groundwater.
Approximately 1,350 people live within 3 miles of the landfill. There are about 500 people living
within a mile of the site. Residents within the area obtain their drinking water from individual
wells. The site is situated in the valley of a tributary to Black Creek and is surrounded by
wetlands.
o-* D -U-I-* TI.- •* • u • AA A*. K NPL LISTING HISTORY
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through Proposed Date: 10/15/84
Final Date: 06/10/86
Federal and potentially responsible
parties' actions.
Threats and Contaminants
Groundwater and surface water are contaminated with various VOCs, as well as heavy
metals including arsenic, chromium, iron, and manganese. Soil is contaminated with
arsenic, chromium, and polynuclear aromatics. People may be at risk by touching or
drinking contaminated well water or accidentally ingesting contaminated soil.
Pollutants are seeping into the wetlands on the site, posing a possible threat to
ecologically sensitive resources, wildlife, or aquatic biota.
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in a long-term remedial phase focusing on the reduction of soil
contaminant mobility by containment through the installation of a solid waste landfill cap, and the
extraction and treatment of contaminated groundwater.
November 1994
-------
Response Action Status
Entire Site: The EPA has investigated the nature and extent of groundwater, surface
water, and soil contamination at the site. The study was completed and a remedy for
the site was selected in 1991. The selected remedy specifically includes the
installation of a cap designed and constructed in accordance with state sanitary landfill closure
regulations, and the extraction of groundwater and chemical precipitation and filtration to remove
dissolved metals, followed by ultraviolet oxidation of dissolved organic compounds. Design of
the remedy began in late 1992, and is expected to be completed in 1995.
Site Facts: Special notice letters were sent to potentially responsible parties in 1992 requesting
reimbursement of Federal funds already incurred, and soliciting interest in conducting the design
and construction of the selected remedy. No good faith offers were received in response to these
letters. Unilateral Administrative Orders were sent to six potentially responsible parties in
September 1992 directing them to design and construct the selected remedial alternative. Ford
Motor Company was the only potentially responsible party to comply with the Order.
Environmental Progress
After adding this site to the NPL, the EPA performed preliminary investigations and determined
that no immediate actions were required at the Hertel Landfill site while the selected remedy is
being designed.
November 1 994 2 HERTEL LANDFILL
-------
HOOKER -
102ND STREE
NEW YORK
EPA ID# NYD9805068
Site Description —
EPA REGION 2
Niagara County
;t of Griffin Park in Niagara Falls
Other Names:
102nd Street Landfill
The 102nd Street Landfill consists of two land parcels totalling more than 22 acres. Occidental
Chemical Corporation, formerly Hooker Chemical and Plastics Corporation, owns 15 1/2 acres,
and the remaining 61/2 acres are owned by Olin Chemical Corporation. The site is located
adjacent to the Niagara River and south of the Love Canal. A portion of the filled area of the
site is an extension of the original Love Canal excavation. The larger portion of the landfill was
operated from 1943 until 1971. During that time, about 23,500 tons of mixed organic solvents,
organic and inorganic phosphates, and related chemicals were deposited at the landfill. Brine
sludge, fly ash, electrochemical cell parts and related equipment, and 300 tons of
hexachlorocyclohexane process cake, including lindane, were deposited at the site. The smaller
portion of the site operated as a landfill from 1948 to about 1970, during which time 66,000 tons
of mixed organic and inorganic chemicals were deposited. In addition, about 20,000 tons of
mercury brine and brine sludge, more than 1,300 tons of a mixture of hazardous chemicals, 16
tons of mixed concrete boiler ash, fly ash, and other residual materials were disposed of at the
site. The landfill continues to discharge contaminants to the Niagara River. At the present time,
there are sections of the Love Canal Emergency Declaration Area that are being reinhabited.
Griffin Park, with the exception of the boat-launch area, has been closed to the public. There is
limited residential development to the east and west of the Love Canal Emergency Declaration
Area.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
federal and potentially responsible
parties' actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 12/30/82
Final Date: 09/08/83
November 1994
-------
Threats and Contaminants
IT
Ground water contains volatile organic compounds (VOCs) including benzene and
toluene; semi-volatile organics such as chlorinated benzenes, phenols, and
chlorophenols; pesticides; chlorinated dioxins and furans; and heavy metals including
arsenic, cadmium, and mercury. Niagara River sediments contain semi-volatile
organics, pesticides, and mercury. Soils and fill contain VOCs, semi-volatile
organics, pesticides, chlorinated dioxins and furans, metals, and phosphorus. The
storm sewer contains VOCs, semi-volatile organics, pesticides, and mercury. On-site
cleanup workers risk harmful exposure through accidental ingestion of contaminated
soils; drinking ground water; or by inhaling and coming in direct contact with
contaminated soils, ground water, and sediments. People also may be at risk by eating
contaminated fish from the river. The most significant off-site health threat would be
from contaminants that become airborne during work activities at the site. The site is
fenced and there is no public access to the site.
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in two phases: immediate actions and a long-term remedial phase
focusing on cleanup of the entire site.
Response Action Status
Immediate Actions: In 1972, the site was capped, a fence was erected on three
sides, and a bulkhead along the Niagara River was installed.
Entire Site: The parties potentially responsible for site contamination, under EPA
and State supervision, conducted an investigation into the nature and extent of
contamination at the site, including the landfill residues, off-site fill, shallow ground
water, liquid waste, off-site soil, river sediments, and storm drains. The investigation was
completed in 1990. In the fall of 1990, the EPA selected a remedy which includes the installing
of a synthetic-lined cap; consolidating off-site soils beneath the cap; surrounding the waste mass
with a slurry wall; dredging and incinerating highly contaminated sediments; dredging,
dewatering and consolidating, beneath the cap, the remaining contaminated sediments; recovering
and treating of ground water; incinerating any recovered liquids; monitoring; and restricting
access to the site by installing additional fencing. Design of the remedy was begun in the fall of
1991, and is scheduled to be completed in 1995. The design plan was approved by the EPA in
1992. However, certain concerns raised by the Federal and State natural resource trustees have
caused the EPA to re-examine the engineering design as proposed. This review is underway.
November 1994 2 HOOKER - 102ND STREET
-------
Site Facts: In 1979, the U.S. Department of Justice, on behalf of the EPA, filed a law suit
against two parties potentially responsible for the site contamination to end the continuing
discharges and to clean up on-site and off-site contamination. The parties, with EPA and State
guidance, agreed to conduct a study into the nature and extent of site contamination and to
recommend alternatives for the cleanup of the site. An Administrative Order, covering the
engineering design and cleanup action, was signed by the EPA in September 1991, and issued to
the two potentially responsible parties, Occidental Chemical Corporation and Olin Chemical
Corporation. The two parties have agreed to comply with the Order. The Canadian government
has shown a special interest in the site, since it abuts the Niagara River. Due to the site's
proximity and relationship to the Love Canal site, the design of the EPA-selected remedy may be
affected by the technologies being used to complete the cleanup of the Love Canal site.
Environmental Progress
Fencing the site to restrict access, constructing a cap over the site, and installing the bulkhead
along the river to limit the migration of contaminants off the site have limited the potential of
exposure to contaminants at the Hooker-102nd Street site while cleanup activities are being
designed.
HOOKER - 102ND STREET 3 November 1994
-------
HOOKER -
HYDE PARK
NEW YORK
EPA ID# NYD000831644
EPA REGION 2
Niagara County
Northwest of the City of Niagara Falls
Other Names:
Hyde Park Landfill
Site Description
Hooker-Hyde Park is a 15-acre site that was used to dispose of approximately 80,000 tons of
waste, some of it hazardous material, from 1953 to 1975. The landfill is immediately surrounded
by several industrial facilities and property owned by the New York Power Authority. The
Niagara River, which flows into Lake Ontario, is located 2,000 feet northwest of the site. Bloody
Run Creek, the drainage basin for the landfill area, flows from the northwestern corner of the
landfill. The creek eventually flows into storm sewers and down the Niagara Gorge Face into the
Niagara River. The site is located a few blocks east of a 500-home residential community.
Approximately 3,000 people are employed by the industries near the site. All of the industries
and most of the residences are connected to a municipal water supply system. Three residences
obtain drinking water from private wells, but these residences are not believed to be in the path
of contaminated groundwater that is moving away from the site.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed flirough
Federal and potentially responsible
parties' actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 12/01/82
Final Date: 09/01/83
Threats and Contaminants
The groundwater is contaminated with volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and dioxin
from former disposal activities. Bloody Run Creek sediments were contaminated with
VOCs until their removal in 1993. Surface water of the Niagara Gorge Face is
contaminated with VOCs. Potential health threats include coming into direct contact
with or accidentally ingesting water from Bloody Run Creek and the Niagara Gorge
Face. Another possible threat is the consumption of contaminated fish from Lake
Ontario. Although groundwater is contaminated, there are no known uses of
groundwater within the area, so it is unlikely that people would be exposed to
groundwater contaminants. Access to the landfill is restricted by a fence and a 24-hour
guard.
November 1 994
-------
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in a long-term remedial phase focusing on cleanup of the entire site.
Response Action Status
Entire Site: In 1985, EPA selected cleanup remedies which include the following: a
prototype source control extraction well system to remove non-aqueous phase liquids
(NAPL) from the overburden in the landfill; an overburden drain system surrounding
the landfill; a bedrock NAPL plume containment system consisting of an extraction and purge
well system; an aqueous phase liquid (contaminated leachate) plume containment system
consisting of purge wells; a shallow and deep groundwater study; a Niagara Gorge seep program;
and the treatment of leachates. The potentially responsible party, Occidental Chemical
Corporation (OCC), has implemented these remedies since 1985. Two source control wells were
pump tested in 1993 and are operating. Four additional source control wells were installed in
1994. A drain surrounding the landfill to collect and contain leachate was completed in 1990 and
is operating, creating an inward hydraulic gradient around the landfill. The bedrock NAPL
containment system was installed in phases. Phase I of the prototype purge wells were installed
and a series of pump tests were performed throughout 1993 on these wells. Phase II of the
prototype purge wells were installed in late 1993 and were pump tested in 1994. The aqueous
phase liquid containment wells were installed in 1993 and rest of the system was completed in
1994. The construction of the on-site leachate storage, handling, and treatment facility was
completed in 1989. Aqueous phase liquid is treated on-site by biological pretreatment and
activated carbon. NAPL is collected at this facility and transferred to an approved facility for
thermal destruction. The Niagara Gorge Face seeps have been cleaned. Contaminated sediment
was removed and some water diverted into a culvert so that people no longer have access to these
seeps. In addition to these remedial measures, an Industrial Protection Program to protect nearby
workers from contaminants has been completed. The draft Lake Ontario Bioaccumulation Study
was completed in 1989, distributed for scientific review and made available to the public in
September 1992. Fish and sediment samples from Lake Ontario were collected and analyzed, and
laboratory studies were conducted. The community monitoring program, consisting of monitoring
wells placed within the community and sampled quarterly to provide early warning of
contamination from Hyde Park indicator chemicals, has been completed. An assessment was
completed in early 1992 to determine the risk of excavating Bloody Run sediments. The risks
from excavation, the EPA's preferred alternative, were found acceptable and the decision made to
excavate the Bloody Run. Excavation was completed in early 1993. The perimeter of the landfill
was capped in 1992. The landfill itself will be capped in late 1994. All cleanup activities are
expected to be completed in late 1995.
Site Facts: In 1981, the EPA, the Department of Justice, the State, and OCC signed a Consent
Decree specifying OCC's responsibilities for cleanup of contamination at the site and maintenance
of these remedies. There is intense public scrutiny of activities related to this site. Two citizens'
groups have intervened in the lawsuit against the potentially responsible party. The Canadian
government also reviewed all of the program activities.
November 1994 2 HOOKER - HYDE PARK
-------
Environmental Progress
Many of the cleanup actions at the Hooker-Hyde Park site have been started or are completed.
The removal of contaminated soils and sediments as well as the leachate control and treatment
operations have substantially reduced potential health risks and further environmental degradation
while final cleanup actions are being completed.
HOOKER - HYDE PARK
November 1 994
-------
HOOKER CHEMICA
RUCO POLYMER
NEW YORK
EPA ID# NYD002920312
EPA REGION 2
Nassau County
Hicksville
Other Names:
Ruco Polymer Corp.
Site Description
The Hooker Chemical/Ruco Polymer site, in an industrial park area of Hicksville on Long Island,
has been used to manufacture plastics, latex, and esters since 1945. Liquid process wastes were
discharged into sand sumps from 1951 to 1975. The sand sumps for Plant 2, which manufactured
polyvinyl chloride (PVCs) and latex, received approximately 2 million gallons of process
wastewater per year from 1956 to 1975. In addition, unknown amounts of styrene and butadiene
were discharged from the latex processing. Reportedly, the dry well for Plant 1, used for the
manufacture of esters, received wastewater containing mixed glycols and alcohols. Currently,
only cooling water is disposed of on site, while other wastes are sent off site for disposal. Some
glycol wastes are incinerated on site. Numerous leaks and spills of chemicals, including
polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), have occurred, and solidified latex materials are buried on
site. Waste disposal and chemical spillage also have occurred at the adjacent Grumman Aerospace
Corporation Plant. The Hooker plant site is fenced, and contaminated areas are accessible to only
a few of the 90 employees at the facility. The site is immediately over Long Island's sole water
supply aquifer. Approximately 20,000 people live within a mile of the site. One of the public
water supply wells located within 3 miles of the site serves 58,000 people. There are four public
water supply wells within a mile of the site and 24 wells within 3 miles.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal and potentially responsible
parties' actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 10/15/84
Final Date: 06/10/86
Threats and Contaminants
Groundwater underlying the site is contaminated with organic compounds such as
vinyl chloride, trichloroethylene (TCE) and tentatively identified compounds (TICs).
Several private wells located downgradient from the site are contaminated with vinyl
chloride. On-site soils are polluted with VOCs, non-volatile organics and PCBs. The
greatest potential health risk is to people who eat, drink, inhale, or come into direct
contact with contaminants through the ground water.
November 1994
-------
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in three remedial phases directed at cleanup of the Ruco facility,
PCB-contaminated soils, and downgradient groundwater.
Response Action Status
Ruco Facility: The party potentially responsible for the site contamination has
conducted an investigation into the nature and extent of soil and groundwater
contamination at the Ruco facility. The investigation has defined the contaminants of
concern at the Ruco facility and alternatives for the soil and groundwater cleanup were analyzed.
The facility investigation was completed in 1992, after which the EPA evaluated the alternatives
and selected the most appropriate remedies for site cleanup. The analysis of alternatives was
completed in the summer of 1993 and the remedy selection was issued in early 1994.
PCB-Contaminated Soils: The potentially responsible party completed an
investigation and submitted a study report to address the PCB-contaminated soils. A
remedy for this area was selected by the EPA in 1990. The remedy consisted of
excavation and removal of all PCB-contaminated soils. Lesser contaminated soils were disposed
of in a federally approved facility. Highly contaminated soils were thermally treated and disposed
of off site. The excavated areas were filled with clean fill and then paved over. This action was
completed in 1993.
Downgradient Groundwater: The EPA currently is coordinating the activities
concerning the investigation of groundwater contamination that has migrated beyond
the Ruco facility with similar activities being conducted at two adjacent sites. It is
anticipated that the investigations will lead to the selection of a remedy for the groundwater
contamination that has migrated from the three sites.
Site Facts: In 1988, the EPA signed a Consent Order with a party potentially responsible for
the contamination on the site to conduct a study into the nature and extent of site contamination
and to recommend alternatives for final cleanup. In 1991 a Unilateral Administrative Order was
issued that required the parties to design and implement the remedy for the PCB-contaminated
soils.
Environmental Progress
The removal of PCB-contaminated soil from the Hooker Chemical/Ruco site has reduced threats
to the public and the environment while additional cleanup activities are planned.
November 1994 2 HOOKER CHEMICAL/ RUCO POLYMER
-------
HOOKER CHEMICAL
S-AREA
NEW YORK
EPA ID# NYD980651087
EPA REGION 2
Niagara County
Along the Niagara River
Site Description
The Hooker Chemical/S-Area site includes an 8-acre landfill owned by the Occidental Chemical
Corporation (OCC), which is located on the company's Buffalo Avenue plant in Niagara Falls.
OCC disposed of approximately 63,000 tons of chemical processing wastes into the S-Area from
1947 to 1961. The S-Area also was used by OCC for disposal of other wastes and debris, a
practice that ended in 1975. Located east of the site is the City of Niagara Falls Drinking Water
Treatment Plant (CWTP). The S-Area Landfill lies atop approximately 30 feet of soil, clay, till,
and manmade fill on an area reclaimed from the Niagara River. Two lagoons for nonhazardous
waste from plant operations are located on top of the landfill and were operated under New York
State permits until 1989, when OCC discontinued operating these lagoons. During an inspection
of the CWTP in 1969, chemicals were found in the bedrock water intake structures. In 1978,
sampling of the structures and bedrock water intake tunnel revealed chemical contamination.
Subsequently, the City of Niagara Falls took action to safeguard its water processing system. The
site is located in a heavily industrialized area of Niagara Falls. There is a residential community
of approximately 700 people within 1/4 mile northeast of the site. The CWTP serves an estimated
70,000 people.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal and potentially responsible
parties' actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 12/30/82
Final Date: 09/08/83
Threats and Contaminants
On- and off-site groundwater is contaminated from non-aqueous phase liquid
chemicals. On-site groundwater also is contaminated with volatile organic compounds
(VOCs). On- and off-site soils are minimally contaminated. The main health threat to
people is the risk from eating fish from the lower Niagara River/Lake Ontario Basin.
Consumption of drinking water from the City's CWTP is not presenting health risks at
present.
November 1994
-------
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in three phases: immediate actions and two long-term remedial phases
focusing on cleanup of the entire site and construction of a water treatment plant.
Response Action Status
Immediate Actions: The City closed the contaminated main intake tunnel and put
an emergency tunnel into service to alleviate the threat of contaminating drinking
water.
Entire Site: The EPA selected a containment and collection remedy to prevent
further chemical migration from the landfill and off-site areas toward the existing
CWTP and into and under the Niagara River. The selected remedy includes: a slurry
barrier wall containment system to encompass the landfill and adjacent off-site contaminated
areas; a collection system for both aqueous and non-aqueous phase liquid chemicals; an on-site
leachate storage tank facility for separating and storing the aqueous and non-aqueous chemicals
prior to treatment; a carbon adsorption treatment facility for contaminated groundwater;
incineration of non-aqueous phase liquid chemicals; a final cap covering the site; and monitoring
programs to determine the effectiveness of the remedy. The activities to install the cleanup
technology systems began in late 1990 with the installation of the bedrock pumping and recovery
well system. The leachate storage tank facility was completed in 1992. The on-site carbon
adsorption treatment facility was constructed in 1993. Construction of the slurry barrier wall is
expected to be completed in 1994, along with the installation of the overburden collection wells
and the tile collection system. The tile collection system is expected to be completed in 1995.
The bedrock and overburden collection systems are scheduled to be operational in 1996. All the
remaining construction activities, including the final cap, are scheduled for completion by 1998.
City of Niagara Falls Drinking Water Treatment Plant: To address
contamination at the existing drinking water treatment plant, the City plans to
construct a new plant immediately east of the current plant along the Niagara River.
The designs for the new plant were completed in late 1993. Currently, construction is scheduled
to start in 1994, and the new plant is expected to be completed in 1997. An interim water
quality monitoring program is ongoing at the existing CWTP and will continue until the new
plant is operational.
Site Facts: In 1979, the U.S. Department of Justice, acting on behalf of the EPA, filed a
complaint against the parties potentially responsible for the site contamination. The State of New
York joined in the suit and a Settlement Agreement was signed by the parties in January 1984. It
was approved and entered by the District Court of Western New York in April 1985. The
Agreement called for a potentially responsible party to conduct an investigation at the site, to
recommend cleanup standards for the site, and to conduct site cleanup activities. A second
agreement was signed by the parties in September 1990 and approved by the Court in April
1991. This Agreement, which amended the original 1985 Settlement Agreement, included an
expanded cleanup program to address off-site areas and the construction of a new drinking water
treatment plant.
November 1994 2 HOOKER CHEMICAL/ S-AREA
-------
Environmental Progress
The use of an emergency intake tunnel to alleviate the threat to the main drinking water supply
around the Hooker Chemical/S-Area site greatly reduced the potential for exposure to
contaminated water while additional cleanup activities are underway.
HOOKER CHEMICAL/ S-AREA
November 1994
-------
HUDSON RIVE
RGBs
NEW YORK
EPA ID# NYD9807638
EPA REGION 2
Rensselaer, Washington, and
Saratoga Counties
Between Fort Edward and Troy
Site Description
The Hudson River PCBs site is primarily a 40-mile stretch of the Hudson River between Fort
Edward and Troy in Rensselaer, Washington, and Saratoga Counties. The General Electric Co.
discharged an estimated 1 million pounds of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) into the river from
two capacitor manufacturing plants located in Hudson Falls and Fort Edward. The State has
identified 40 hot spots, defined as sediments contaminated with greater than 50 parts per million
(ppm) of PCBs. Also included in the site are five "remnant" areas, which are river sediments that
were exposed when the level of the river was lowered due to the removal of the Fort Edward
Dam. The Hudson River PCB contamination problem potentially affects all waters, land,
ecosystems, communities, and facilities located in or immediately adjacent to the approximately
200-mile stretch of river from Hudson Falls to the Battery in New York City. In 1976, because
of the concern over the bioaccumulation of PCBs in fish and other aquatic organisms and their
subsequent consumption by people, the State of New York banned fishing in the Upper Hudson
River between Albany and Fort Edward, and commercial fishing of striped bass in the Lower
Hudson. Albany, the largest city in the basin, has a population of more than 100,000 people; the
Town of Fort Edward has a population of 6,480. Land uses in the Hudson River Basin include
agriculture, service, and manufacturing, in addition to residential. The Hudson River is an
important source of hydroelectric power, public water supplies, transportation, and recreation.
The Cities of Waterford, Poughkeepsie, and Rhinebeck, as well as the Highland and Port Ewen
Water Districts obtain their water supplies directly from the Hudson River. In addition, a water
intake near Chelsea, which is north of Beacon, may be used to supplement New York City's
water supplies during periods of drought. The Town of Waterford obtains water from the Upper
Hudson River, which is the only municipal water supply intake below Fort Edward and above the
Troy Dam.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal and potentially responsible
parties' actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 09/08/83
Final Date: 09/21/84
December 1994
-------
Threats and Contaminants
The sediments and water in the river are contaminated with PCBs from discharges
originating from two capacitor manufacturing plants. Elevated concentrations of PCBs
have been found in the air and the soil at the remnant areas and the former dump sites
for dredged sediments. Fish in the Hudson River have been contaminated with PCBs.
The contaminated sediment and soil could pose a health hazard to individuals who
may accidentally ingest or touch it. Eating contaminated fish also could affect the
health of individuals.
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in three stages: immediate actions and two long-term remedial phases
directed at cleanup of the remnant deposits and the river sediments.
Response Action Status
Immediate Actions: In 1977 and 1978, an estimated 180,000 cubic yards of
contaminated sediments were dredged from the east channel at Fort Edward, and,
along with approximately 14,000 cubic yards of highly contaminated sediments from
one of the remnant areas, were placed in a clay-lined containment cell. A 40-mile stretch of the
Upper Hudson River is under a fishing ban, and the Lower Hudson River has a commercial
fishing ban on striped bass and an advisory for other species.
Remnant Deposits: The potentially responsible party has conducted an interim
cleanup of the remnant deposits. The remedy chosen for this portion of the site was
in-place containment of shoreline remnant deposits. This includes covering the
affected areas with a geosynthetic clay liner and a 2-foot layer of soil, followed by grading and
revegetating to minimize erosion. The river banks were stabilized with rock to prevent scouring.
Cap construction and the erection of gates to limit site access have been completed.
River Sediments: The EPA is reassessing an initial determination to take no action
to address contaminated river sediments, and is evaluating cleanup alternatives now.
In 1991, investigations at Bakers Falls, in the vicinity of the General Electric Hudson
Falls facility, a separate State-listed hazardous waste site, showed elevated PCB concentrations in
the water column. General Electric agreed to further investigate this area and to take interim
cleanup actions to prevent this source of PCB contamination from entering the river. Several
measures have been implemented, including: preventing flow of river water through seep areas in
an abandoned mill building; installing seep collection systems; and removing contaminated
sediment from the mill building. Further investigations will determine the effectiveness of these
interim cleanup activities, and if any additional actions will be necessary. As a part of this study,
the EPA has established an extensive community interaction program for the site. The EPA
plans to propose a cleanup approach to the community in late 1995.
December 1994 2 HUDSON RIVER PCBs
-------
Site Facts: General Electric was sent a notice letter as a party potentially responsible for the
contamination. General Electric agreed to implement the in-place containment remedy for the
remnant deposits and to reimburse the EPA for any costs incurred for that portion of the site
remedy. General Electric also signed a consent agreement with the EPA to conduct investigations
into contaminated river sediments and to take interim cleanup actions to prevent further spreading
of PCB contaminants.
Environmental Progress
Cap construction has been completed at the remnant deposits area of the Hudson River PCBs site
to prevent exposure to contaminants by direct contact or inhalation. In addition, the capping of
the remnant deposits along with the bank stabilization should minimize the amount of PCBs
entering the river from these areas. Further studies to evaluate alternatives to address the river
sediments are underway.
HUDSON RIVER PCBs
December 1994
-------
ISLIP MUNICIPAL
SANITARY L
NEW YORK
EPA ID# NYD9805069
Site Description
EPA REGION 2
Suffolk County
Blydenburgh Road, Long Island
Other Names:
Blydenburgh Road Landfill
The Islip Municipal Sanitary Landfill covers approximately 55 acres in the town of Islip. The
surrounding area is entirely residential, except for a golf course immediately to the east of the
landfill. The town has operated the landfill since 1963. In 1978, 50 or more 55-gallon drums
containing a mixture of tetrachloroethene and other liquids were allegedly disposed of at the site.
This is the only reported case of hazardous waste disposal at the site. The methane gas within the
landfill is being collected in extraction wells and directed to generators, where the gas is burned
to generate electricity, or to flares. According to tests conducted by the Suffolk County Health
Department in 1980, the private wells adjacent to the landfill are contaminated with volatile
organic compounds (VOCs). In 1981, the town of Islip connected affected residents to a
inent public water supply. A resident located downgradient of the site was being supplied
with bottled water until 1992 when the hookup to a permanent public water supply was
completed. The landfill stopped receiving waste in December 1990. An estimated 75,000 people
draw drinking water from Suffolk County Authority wells, as well as from numerous private
wells. All of these wells are within 3 miles of the landfill. A day care center and a school are
located nearby.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through a
combination of State, and Municipal
Government actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 01/01/87
Final Date: 03/30/89
Threats and Contaminants
The groundwater is contaminated with VOCs, including tetrachloroethene and vinyl
chloride. Site contaminants have been detected in the shallow (Glacial) aquifer and in
the upper portion of the underlying deeper (Magothy) aquifer. These aquifers are the
sole sources of water for the Suffolk County public water supplies and private wells
used for domestic purposes. The ingestion of or exposure to contaminated
groundwater is a health risk.
November 1994
-------
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in a long-term remedial phase focusing on cleanup of the entire site.
Response Action Status
Entire Site: The town of Islip, under an order from New York State, investigated
the nature and extent of contamination and identified alternatives for cleanup. A
remedy was selected for the site hi 1992. The major components of the selected
remedy include capping the landfill and treating the most contaminated portion of the aquifer.
Preparatory work for the installation of the fifty-two acre cap began in early 1993, and has been
completed. The groundwater pump and treat system is under design, and is expected to be
completed in 1995. It is anticipated that the groundwater pump and treat system will operate for
10 years.
Site Facts: In January 1983, a Consent Judgment was entered between the State and the Town
of Islip to close, cap, and recover gas at the landfill. The town of Islip signed an Interim Order
of Consent with the State of New York on May 12, 1987, which outlined options for recycling
waste, closing the landfill, and expanding the landfill. Under State authority, a portion of the
landfill was capped and the landfill was expanded. On December 18, 1990, the town of Islip
ceased landfilling of municipal solid wastes at the site. A complete closure program for the
entire landfilled area, including capping, methane recovery, groundwater treatment, and
monitoring activities, is being implemented, as required by a Consent Order with New York
State.
Environmental Progress
The EPA determined, based on initial evaluations, that no immediate actions were required at the
Islip Municipal Sanitary Landfill site, while final cleanup remedies are being planned.
November 1994 2 ISLIP MUNICIPAL SANITARY LANDFILL
-------
JOHNSTOWN
CITY LANDFILL
NEW YORK
EPA ID# NYD98050692
EPA REGION 2
Fulton County
1 Vi miles northwest of
Johnstown City
Site Description
The Johnstown City Landfill covers 68 acres. From 1947 to 1960, it was the site of an open
municipal dump. This unlined landfill accepted industrial wastes from local tanneries and textile
plants from 1960 until mid-1977. Johnstown City operated the site as an unlicensed municipal
landfill. The landfill also accepted sludge from the City's wastewater treatment plant from 1973
to 1979. The sewage sludge on-site contains high concentrations of chromium, iron, and lead.
Groundwater in monitoring wells on the site is contaminated, and various seeps of leachate have
occurred. Johnstown City is a residential community of 29,000 people, 1,000 of whom live
within a 1-mile radius of the site. There are 10 homes within 1,000 feet of the site, all of which
have private wells. The closest of these wells is within 150 feet of the site's northern border and
is contaminated.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal, State, and municipal actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 10/01/84
Final Date: 06/01/86
Threats and Contaminants
Methane gas has been escaping into the air from the landfill. On-site monitoring
wells contain chlorides and heavy metals including chromium, lead, and zinc, as well
as volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs).
On-site soils are contaminated with VOCs, SVOCs, chromium, and lead. Aluminum,
iron, lead, manganese, selenium, cyanide, zinc, and ammonia-nitrogen have been
found in Matthew Creek. On-site workers could be at risk by inhaling air that contains
contaminated dust particles or by touching contaminated groundwater, surface water,
or soils. People off-site could be at risk if they ingest contaminated groundwater or
touch contaminated surface water and soil, but private well contamination has not been
high enough to warrant an advisory. The headwaters of Matthew Creek flow south
from the landfill and are located within 500 feet of the site. The landfill's release of
leachate may have contributed to fish kills in the creek.
November 1994
-------
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in a long-term remedial phase focusing on cleanup of the entire site.
Response Action Status
Entire Site: The City of Johnstown, pursuant to a Consent Order with the State,
conducted an investigation to determine the nature and extent of contamination at, and
emanating from, the site and to evaluate cleanup alternatives. In early 1993, based
upon the results of the study, EPA selected a remedy which called for the landfill to be capped
using a multi-media system and for expansion of the Johnstown City water-supply system to
provide drinking water to all private water supplies potentially impacted by the landfill.
Site Facts: EPA sent Notice letters to 14 parties potentially responsible for the site contamina-
tion and the City of Johnstown in 1988. In 1988, the State of New York signed a Consent Order
with the City of Johnstown to conduct a study at the site. On three separate occasions, methane
gas was detected in the air to the northeast of the site at levels that could cause an explosion.
This prompted local health officials in the community to test individual homes in the site's
immediate area. Test results have shown that the houses were free of methane.
Environmental Progress
After adding the Johnstown City Landfill to the NPL, EPA performed a preliminary evaluation of
the site conditions and determined that no immediate actions are necessary while cleanup
activities are being planned.
November 1994 2 JOHNSTOWN CITY LANDFILL
-------
JONES CHEMICAL
INC.
NEW YORK
EPA ID# NYD000813428
Site Description
EPA REGION 2
Livingston County
100 Sunny Sol Blvd., Caledonia
The Jones Chemicals, Inc. site is a 10-acre chemical manufacturing plant that repackaged
chlorine from bulk containers into cylinders from 1942 to 1960. In 1960, Jones Chemicals
repackaged solvents including trichloroethylene (TCE). As part of this process, the plant
installed aboveground bulk storage tanks on the site. In 1972, the plant converted underground
tanks to store solvents. Jones Chemicals stopped repackaging solvents in 1985. The plant now
produces sodium hypochlorite solutions and ammonium hydroxide. It also repackages chlorine,
ammonia, inorganic mineral acids, sodium hypochlorite, ammonium hydroxide, and caustic soda.
Throughout the plant's operating years, the company spilled many of these chemicals while
repackaging them. The New York State Department of Health detected TCE and chloroform in
three on-site wells in tests conducted in 1986. These spills also contaminated off-site wells,
including the groundwater supply for the Village of Caledonia. Spring Creek is a tributary of
Oatka Creek and is within a mile downslope of the site. Local area residents use the creek for
recreational activities. This community is primarily residential and has a population of 2,250.
Between 2,500 and 3,000 people obtain drinking water from wells within 3 miles of the site. A
freshwater wetland is also within a mile of the site.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal, State, and potentially
responsible party's actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 06/24/88
Final Date: 02/21/90
Threats and Contaminants
The groundwater contains volatile organic compounds (VOCs), including
tetrachloroethene (TCE) and chloroform, as a direct result of chemical spills to the
ground. Soils contain VOCs including methylene chloride and TCE. Use of untreated
groundwater as a source of drinking water poses a health risk to the population.
November 1994
-------
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in two stages: immediate actions and a long-term remedial phase
focusing on cleanup of the entire site.
Response Action Status
Immediate Actions: Jones Chemicals, Inc. removed three underground storage
tanks in 1985. An air stripper system will be installed in 1994 as a pilot test. The
air stripper is expected to reduce the concentration of groundwater contaminants at
the source. Following the contamination of the Village of Caledonia's water supply, the Village
installed an air stripper to treat the water prior to distribution.
Entire Site: In early 1991, under EPA oversight, the potentially responsible party
began an investigation to determine the nature and extent of the contamination at, and
emanating from, the site and to evaluate cleanup alternatives. This study is expected
to be completed in late 1995, at which time, EPA will evaluate the results and recommend the
final cleanup remedy.
Site Facts: In early 1991, the parties potentially responsible for site contamination signed an
Administrative Order on Consent in which they agreed to complete an investigation into the site
contamination and to develop alternatives for final cleanup.
Environmental Progress
The removal of underground storage tanks has reduced the potential for further contamination at
the Jones Chemicals Company site while detailed investigations leading to the selection of a final
cleanup remedy are taking place. By installing an air stripper on the village's water supply, the
potential exposure of the public to hazardous materials has been significantly reduced.
November 1994 2 JONES CHEMICALS, INC.
-------
JONES EPA REGION 2
r*"->^^ „ ^_—.—, Dutchess County
SANITATION --HnlM Cardinal ^"Hvde Park
NEW YORK
EPA ID# NYD98053455
Site Description
The Jones Sanitation site occupies 10 acres in a rural part of Dutchess County. The owner
opened the site in 1956 to dispose of septic and industrial wastes and continued this practice until
a new owner took over the site in 1977. From the early 1960s through 1979, the landfill accepted
industrial liquid wastes and sludges that Alfa-Laval, formerly known as the DeLaval Separator
Co. of Poughkeepsie, generated. These materials were oils and greases, acids, alkalis, solvents,
metals from plating operations, pigments, phenols, and volatile organic compounds (VOCs)
including methylene chloride, chloroform and trichloroethylene (TCE). The landfill accepted
about 77,000 gallons of liquid industrial waste per month from Alfa-Laval from 1972 until 1979.
As many as 30 disposal pits may have been used at one time. The site now accepts only septic
wastes from commercial firms. According to the Dutchess County Health Department, disposal
practices on site were not adequate to control discharges of hazardous substances onto the
ground. The current owner excavated the disposal pits and piled the contents on the ground
without a liner. Maritje Kill and other associated wetlands in the area cross the property
approximately 150 feet downgradient of the disposal area. Two springs are located west of the
site. One spring reportedly produces 75 gallons per minute and serves Roosevelt School. The
other serves domestic herds at the Vanderbilt Mansion National Historic Site. There are 1,135
people within 1 mile of the site, and 9,485 people live within 3 miles, all of whom obtain water
from 23 wells within 3 miles of the site. The nearest water supply well is 1,000 feet from the
site.
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through Proposed Date: 01/22/87
Federal, State, and potentially
responsible parties' actions.
Final Date: 07/22/87
November 1994
-------
Threats and Contaminants
The groundwater and surface water contain inorganic materials from the disposal
areas, including heavy metals such as chromium, copper, lead, cadmium, and
mercury, as well as oils, grease, and VOCs. Soil also contains inorganic materials
from the disposal areas, oils, grease, and VOCs. The supplemental water supply for
Hyde Park is located 2,500 feet from the site. Although the EPA has sampled all
water supplies in the area and has found them currently safe for all uses, the potential
for people to be exposed to contaminated groundwater exists. Access to the site is
unrestricted. People who accidentally ingest or come into contact with contaminants
could be at risk. People also may be at risk from eating local animals or fish that
come into contact with possibly contaminated surface waters. The site is unfenced,
making it possible for people and animals to come into direct contact with hazardous
substances.
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in a long-term remedial phase focusing on cleanup of the entire site.
Response Action Status
Entire Site: The EPA took over the management of the site investigations and
cleanup from the State in 1990. The potentially responsible parties began conducting
the site study to determine the extent of contamination in 1991. The study is expected
to be completed in 1995. The potentially responsible party submitted the work plan and the
sampling analysis plan in September 1991. Field work began in August of 1992. A preliminary
site characterization summary was completed in November of 1993.
Site Facts: In June 1978, the owner/operator of the site submitted an application for a permit
under the State Pollution Discharge Elimination System (SPDES). When the State denied the
permit, the owner/operator submitted a SPDES permit application for subsurface discharge of
septic waste. The EPA issued an Administrative Order in 1991, compelling Alfa-Laval, Inc. and
Jones Sanitation to conduct the site study.
Environmental Progress
After adding the Jones Sanitation site to the NPL, the EPA performed preliminary investigations
and determined that the site poses no immediate threats to the surrounding community or
environment while investigations leading to selection of the final cleanup remedy are undertaken.
November 1994 2 JONES SANITATION
-------
KATONAH
MUNICIPAL
WELL
NEW YORK
EPA ID# NYD980780795
Site Description
EPA REGION 2
Westchester County
Village of Katonah
in the Town of Bedford
The Katonah Municipal Well site is located on a peninsula that extends into the Muscoot
Reservoir, which supplies drinking water to New York City. The well, which has a main shaft
approximately 9 feet in diameter and 32 feet deep, was designed to draw water from the
underlying aquifer. The County Health Department first discovered contaminants in the Katonah
Well in 1978, at which time it was taken out of service. By 1979, the possible sources of the
contamination were traced to four nearby dry cleaning establishments that were served by septic
systems. The County worked with the owners to correct the problems and to remove the sources.
Several attempts at pumping the well to remove the contamination from the aquifer have been
unsuccessful. The Katonah Municipal Well is part of the Bedford Water and Storage System, and
residences and businesses are required by ordinance to tie into the public supply. The Katonah
Municipal Well had supplied approximately 6,000 residents with water for domestic use. The
population of Bedford is 15,000. The residential portion of the village is located to the west of
the well and extends for several blocks.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal and Municipal actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 10/15/84
Final Date: 06/10/86
Threats and Contaminants
L\
The primary contaminant of the groundwater is the volatile organic compound (VOC)
tetrachloroethylene, which is believed to have been generated by the nearby dry
cleaning operations. Sediments and soils around the site were contaminated with
chlorinated solvents, pesticides, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and
polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). Metals, including nickel, lead, zinc, and copper
were also detected in the soils and sediments.
November 1994
-------
Cleanup Approach
Response Action Status
Entire Site: In 1987, the EPA selected a remedy to clean up the site. The remedy
includes: installing a new production well adjacent to the abandoned well; filling and
sealing the abandoned Katonah Well; installing and operating an on-site air stripping
facility to remove contaminants from the aquifer, with discharge of treated water to the Bedford
consolidated water distribution system; establishing of a monitoring program to detect residual
contamination of treated water; and recommending to the Town of Bedford the removal of trash
and debris located on the peninsula. The Town of Bedford completed the technical designs for the
cleanup in early 1990. All construction at the site was completed in 1993. Treated water is being
discharged to the Bedford consolidated water distribution system for public use.
Site Facts: In June 1988, the EPA entered into a Consent Order with the Town of Bedford to
implement the technical design for the cleanup remedies. In September 1988, the EPA issued a
Unilateral Administrative Order to the other four potentially responsible parties. In July 1989, the
EPA entered into a Consent Decree with the Town of Bedford to clean up the site.
Environmental Progress
Based on preliminary investigations, the EPA determined that the Katonah Municipal Well site
poses no immediate threats to the surrounding community and environment while the water
treatment system continues to operate, removing contaminants from the aquifer.
November 1994 2 KATONAH MUNICIPAL WELL
-------
KENMARK TE
CORP.
NEW YORK
EPA ID# NYD075784165
PA REGION 2
Suffolk County
Farmingdale
Site Description
Textile dye, printing and screening operations are conducted at the 5-acre Kenmark Textile Corp.
site, now occupied by the Susquehanna Textile Corporation. Wastewater generated in the
manufacturing process was originally disposed of in a leaching pit. The sludge from the
wastewater was fed to sludge drying beds for settling and drying, and men drummed prior to off-
site disposal. Three subsurface leaching pools are also located at the site. A wide range of
chemical dyes and washing chemicals including base dyes, acetic acid, citric acid, and chromate
solutions have been used in site operations since 1972. The State issued a permit requiring
Kenmark to treat its wastewater before discharging it to the municipal sewer. In 1981, the
Suffolk County Department of Health temporarily closed Kenmark Textile Corp. for illegal
storage of hazardous waste. The Susquehanna Textile Corp. currently discharges its wastes into
the municipal sewer system. About 10,000 people living within a mile of the site depend on
groundwater as the only source of drinking water. The nearest residential area is located within
650 feet of the site. Public water supply is available for most area residents. A manmade pond
located on Broad Hollow Road is located about 500 feet southeast of the site.
Site Responsibility: This site was addressed through
Federal, State, and potentially
responsible parties' actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 10/01/84
Final Date: 06/01/86
Deletion Date: 05/01/95
Threats and Contaminants
Lead and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were detected in groundwater in
concentrations exceeding the Federal and New York State groundwater drinking
standards. Heavy metals including chromium, lead and zinc were detected in samples
obtained from the leaching pit, leaching pools and sludge drying bed area. There was
a potential health threat to site employees through exposure to contaminated soils and
groundwater. At present, the facility receives its drinking water through a municipal
water supply.
January 1995
-------
Cleanup Approach
Response Action Status
Immediate Actions: Susquehanna Textile has removed some of the surface
contaminants from the site. More than 50 drums containing hydroxide sludge were
stored on site but have since been removed.
Entire Site: The parties potentially responsible for the site contamination, under EPA
direction, completed a study in 1993 that determined the nature and full extent of
contamination at the site. EPA selected a "no action" remedy for the site in early
1994. Risk assessments indicated that there is no risk from the site, because contamination is
within EPA's acceptable range.
Site Facts: The State negotiated with the potentially responsible parties to treat its wastes
properly, discharge them into the municipal sewer system, and remove drums containing
hazardous wastes. In October 1987, the State and the potentially responsible party signed an
order requiring the parties to conduct a study at the site. In July 1991, EPA and the site owner
signed an order requiring the owner to complete the study initiated under State supervision.
Environmental Progress
By removing drums containing contaminants and other visible contaminated materials from the
surface, the Kenmark Textile site was made safe to the surrounding public and the environment.
EPA determined there is no further risk to human health or the environment. The site was
deleted from the NPL in May 1995.
January 1995 2 KENMARK TEXTILE CORP.
-------
KENTUCKY AVENUE
WELL FIELD
NEW YORK
EPA ID# NYD980650667
EPA REGION 2
Chemung County
Near Horseheads
Site Description
The Kentucky Avenue Well Field was developed in 1962 as part of the Elmira Water Board
system, which supplies water to over 60,000 residents in Elmira, Elmira Heights, and
Horseheads. The site is at the confluence of two major valleys within the Chemung River Basin
in the south-central part of the county. The well field overlies the Newtown Creek aquifer and
includes three test wells and a production well. The well field was closed in 1980 because it was
found to be contaminated with trichloroethylene (TCE). Private water wells in the area also were
found to be contaminated. The Elmira Water Board is using temporary alternative water supplies
instead of the Kentucky Avenue wells to supply residents. Two additional residences have refused
connection. There are an estimated 11,000 people living within a mile of the site. The area
surrounding the site is a combination of residential, commercial, and industrial areas, with little
or no agricultural activity.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal and potentially responsible
parties' actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 07/23/82
Final Date: 09/08/83
Threats and Contaminants
TCE was found throughout the Newton Creek aquifer. Private wells near the site are
contaminated with volatile organic compounds (VOCs) including TCE, benzene, and
chloroform. Sediment samples from the ponds and streams northwest and south of the
Old Horseheads Landfill showed high concentrations of inorganic contamination and
heavy metals such as zinc, cadmium, and chromium. Concentrations of VOCs were
detected in discharge waters (surface runoff) to Newtown Creek. Potential health
threats include drinking, inhaling VOCs, or direct contact with contaminated
groundwater by users of private wells. Contamination of the ponds and streams may
harm the wildlife inhabiting the area.
November 1994
-------
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in three stages: immediate actions and two long-term remedial phases
directed at cleanup of the groundwater and the source of the site contamination.
Response Action Status
Immediate Actions: In 1985, 1986, and 1989, the EPA provided alternate water
supplies to residences that were affected by groundwater contamination. These
actions involved temporarily supplying 25 residences with bottled water and
connecting 95 affected residences to the public water distribution system. Disconnected wells
were closed to prevent further use.
Groundwater: Monitoring wells were installed upstream of the Sullivan Street wells
to follow the movement of the contaminant plumes in the Newtown Creek aquifer and
these wells were sampled quarterly. These activities were completed in 1990. Based
on site investigations, the EPA selected a remedy to restore the Kentucky Avenue Well Field in
1990. The remedy includes the installation of extraction wells downgradient of the Westinghouse
plant, the source area, and treatment of the groundwater to drinking water standards. In June
1991, EPA issued an Administrative Order to Westinghouse, the source of the contamination, to
implement the selected remedy. During the Spring and Summer of 1993, field work necessary to
complete the design was conducted. During the Fall of 1993, the results of the field work were
incorporated in a pilot study report, which was submitted to EPA for approval. An air stripper
was installed in 1994 at the Sullivan Street Well to treat the water to drinking water standards.
Source Identification: An investigation is being conducted to determine whether
any measures to control sources of contamination would be feasible at the
Westinghouse plant. This investigation is being conducted by Westinghouse pursuant
to an Administrative Order. EPA has approved the investigation work plan and field sampling
plan submitted by Westinghouse. Field work began in 1994. EPA will conduct oversight of all
work conducted pursuant to this Administrative Order.
Environmental Progress
Providing a safe drinking water source to the residents affected by the contaminated well water
has reduced the risk of exposure to hazardous materials in the groundwater while final cleanup
actions continue at the Kentucky Avenue Well Field site and further investigations into the source
of the pollution are taking place.
November 1994 2 KENTUCKY AVENUE WELL FIELD
-------
LI TUNGSTEN ^___ E™ REGION 2
CORPORATION
NEW YORK
EPA ID# NYD986882660
Site Description
The Li Tungsten Corporate site is 26 acres in size and located in an industrial area along the
north bank of Glen Cove Creek. The site was owned from the 1940s to approximately 1984 by
the Wah Chang Smelting and Refining Company and was last operated by its wholly owned
subsidiary, the Li Tungsten Corp. Operations involved processing ore and scrap tungsten
concentrates to ammonium paratungstate (APT) and subsequently formulating APT to metal
tungsten powder and tungsten carbide powder. Other specialty products such as tungsten carbide
powder plus cobalt, tungsten titanium carbide powder, tungsten spray powder, crystalline
tungsten powder, and molybdenum spray powder were also produced. In 1984, Glen Cove
Development Co. (GCDC) purchased the property for the purpose of developing a residential
area. One year later, Li Tungsten filed for protection under Chapter 11 of the Federal bankruptcy
code and closed operations at the plant facility. In 1988, GCDC performed extensive initial
cleanup activities at the site. As part of these actions, sampling of 10 existing monitoring wells
resulted in the identification of four contaminant plumes in on-site groundwater which is part of
the Upper Glacial Aquifer. Heavy metals and waste water were discovered in one of the plumes.
Numerous contaminants also were detected in on-site monitoring wells. Additional site
investigations were undertaken by the New York State Department of Environmental Control
(NYDEC) in 1989, the results of which indicated that considerable contamination remained at the
site, including: an estimated 100 drums containing contaminants such as cyanide, acids, and
alkalis; numerous storage tanks holding chemicals of an unknown nature; 26 pressurized
cylinders containing chemicals; leaking transformers suspected of containing polychlorinated
biphenyls (PCBs); waste piles with elevated radiation levels; tungsten ore stored in wooden crates
and drums, some of which were broken; and asbestos fibers from decaying tank covers and pipe-
wrapping materials. Contaminated materials leaking from an on-site pond have scarred the site's
surface. Public and private wells within 4 miles of the site serve as the drinking water source for
an estimated 51,000 people; the nearest well is slightly more than a mile from the site.
_. _ ..... _ . . . . • AA A *. u NPL LISTING HISTORY
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through Proposed Date: 7/29/91
Final Date: 10/14/92
Federal, State, and potentially
responsible parties' actions.
November 1994
-------
Threats and Contaminants
The plumes discovered in contaminated groundwater contain heavy metals. Chlorides,
sulfates, lead, cadmium, tungsten, chromium, arsenic, barium, silver, and PCBs were
detected in on-site monitoring wells. Drums containing liquids are believed to be
contaminated with cyanide, acids, and alkalis. Waste piles on site have elevated
radiation levels. Individuals may be at risk of drinking contaminated groundwater or
touching contaminated liquids or soils on site.
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in two stages: immediate actions and a long-term remedial phase
which will focus on comprehensive site cleanup.
Response Action Status
Immediate Actions: In early 1988, GCDC conducted initial cleanup actions. Fifty
tanks were inspected to determine if they were secure against rupture and leakage.
Two questionably secure tanks and one tank truck of ammonia were removed from
the site. Over 100 drums containing acids, organics, and waste oil were overpacked or staged and
then disposed of off site. Identifiable laboratory chemicals also were packed and removed from
the site. A 24-hour security system has been installed at the site. GCDC also installed 13 new
monitoring wells at this time. In response to the EPA's 1989 Administrative Order, GCDC
removed drums, tank contents, laboratory chemicals, and electrical transformers from the site.
Entire Site: In 1992, the EPA began an investigation into the nature and extent of
contamination at the site. The investigation is scheduled for completion in 1996,
after which the EPA will identify remedies for site cleanup.
Site Facts: The EPA filed an Administrative Order of Consent requiring GCDC to conduct
initial cleanup actions at the site. GCDC complied with the Order in 1990. In February 1992,
the EPA sent "Special Notice Letters" to several parties potentially responsible for wastes
associated with the site, offering them an opportunity to conduct a site investigation. Since no
settlement agreements were reached, the EPA is conducting the investigation.
Environmental Progress
GCDC's extensive efforts to contain the source of contamination and remove site contaminants
have resulted in reduction of immediate health risks to nearby residents and workers while
additional site studies are being planned.
November 1994 2 LI TUNGSTEN CORPORATION
-------
Site Repository
Not established.
LI TUNGSTEN CORPORATION 3 November 1994
-------
LIBERTY
FINISHING
NEW YORK
EPA ID# NYD000337295
Site Description
Liberty Industrial Finishing is an abandoned site covering approximately 30 acres in a former
industrial park. The property is bordered on the north by railroad tracks, on the east by Main
Street, on the west by Ellsworth-Allen Park, and the south by Motor Avenue. Since the late
1930s, industrial operations at the site have included the manufacture of aircraft parts and
trailers, and metal plating and finishing operations, including anodizing, electroplating, dying,
and painting. Numerous industrial and light industrial businesses have leased and continue to
lease space at the site. The sludge-drying lagoon, leaching basins, former finishing and
production vats, and the stormwater basin are just some of the contaminated areas. Incidents of
poor housekeeping and disposal practices also have been documented at this location. In 1977,
the State found Liberty in violation of the wastewater discharge limits of its permit. Liberty was
ordered to clean up the site in 1978, but did not comply. In 1984, Four J's Company acquired
title to the site from Liberty Industrial. Approximately 20,200 people live within 1 mile of the
site. About 90,000 people draw drinking water from wells within 3 miles of the site. The site is
located approximately 1 mile south of the Bethpage State Park; Massapequa Creek is half a mile
south of the site and is used for recreational activities.
_. _ ..... „_ . . . , . ,. , , , NPL LISTING HISTORY
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through
Federal, State, and potentially
responsible parties' actions.
Threats and Contaminants
Proposed Date: 10/15/84
Final Date: 06/10/86
Groundwater and soils are contaminated with heavy metals including cadmium and
chromium and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) such as dichloroethene,
trichloroethene, and tetrachloroethene. Numerous underground features (e.g., pipes,
drains, sumps, basements, storage tanks) containing contaminated soil, sludge or
waste are found at the site. Elevated concentrations of polychlorinated biphenyls
(PCBs) were detected in soils adjacent to current and former electrical transformers.
A health risk exists to those who come into contact with or ingest contaminated
groundwater or soils.There are no private drinking wells in the vicinity of the site.
People living near the site obtain their drinking water from local water utilities, who
test their supplies to ensure compliance with State and federal drinking water
standards. Wildlife and plants at Massapequa Creek may be at risk. PCB
contamination in the electrical transformer areas pose a health threat to workers and
trespassers. Residents and users of the Ellsworth-Allen Park are not likely to be at
risk.
November 1994
-------
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in two stages: immediate actions and a long-term remedial phase
focusing on cleanup of the entire site.
Response Action Status
Immediate Actions: Several cleanup efforts have been undertaken by the site
owners and operators. Unknown amounts of contaminated soil and sludge were
removed from the basins in 1978 and 1987. Another cleanup occurred in 1980 as a
result of a fire in one of the tenant facilities. The EPA performed a removal site evaluation and
concluded that two underground storage tanks and soils contaminated with PCBs in the electrical
transformer areas should be removed. The EPA began performing this removal action in late
1994.
Entire Site: The Four J's Company, under State supervision, conducted a limited
investigation to determine the extent of the contamination in some portions of the site.
In lieu of the limited data available, additional studies measuring the full extent of on-
and off-property contamination were deemed necessary before remedies could be selected for site
cleanup. The EPA initiated an investigation in late 1991 to define the nature and extent of
contamination. The final report was released in early 1994. A feasibility study, detailing
alternatives for addressing contaminated soils at the site, is planned for completion in 1995. The
EPA also is planning further sampling of the soils under existing buildings and the deep aquifer
to further define the extent of contamination. The additional investigatory activities began during
the summer of 1994.
Site Facts: In September 1978, Liberty Industrial Finishing entered into a Consent Agreement
with the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) to clean up the
site. It failed to comply with the Agreement. Subsequently, in April 1985, NYSDEC issued a
Consent Order to Four J's Company, then owner of the site, requiring it to conduct a study of
site contamination. The Four J's Company's study plan was determined to be inadequate because
it did not address all on- or off-site contamination. In March 1987, NYSDEC issued a second
Order, this time to 55 Motor Avenue Co., which manages the site, to remove contaminated soils
and sludges in disposal basins at the site. Under the second Order, contaminated soils and sludges
have been removed from the recharge basins, and other disposal areas at the site.
Environmental Progress
The removal of contaminated soils and sludges from the disposal basins has reduced the threats to
the public and the environment posed by the site. Completion of the EPA removal action will
further eliminate potential threats.
November 1994 2 LIBERTY INDUSTRIAL FINISHING
-------
LOVE CANAL
NEW YORK
EPA ID# NYD000606
EPA REGION 2
Niagara County
Niagara Falls
Other Names:
Hooker Chemicals Love Canal
Site Description
The fenced 70-acre Love Canal site contains a 16-acre hazardous waste landfill, which is
currently covered with a 40-acre clay/synthetic liner cap. The site includes the original canal that
was excavated by William T. Love in the 1890s for a proposed hydroelectric power project. The
project was never built. Beginning in 1942, the landfill was used by Hooker Chemicals and
Plastics, now Occidental Chemical Corporation, for the disposal of over 21,000 tons of various
chemical wastes, including dioxins. Dumping ceased in 1952, and the following year the area
was covered and deeded to the Niagara Falls Board of Education. The area near the site was
extensively developed, which included the construction of an elementary school and numerous
homes. Problems with odors and residues, first reported in the 1960s, increased in the 1970s as
the water table rose, bringing contaminated groundwater to the surface. Studies indicated that
numerous toxic chemicals had migrated into the surrounding area directly adjacent to the original
disposal site. Runoff drained into the Niagara River, approximately 3 miles upstream of the
intake tunnels for the Niagara Falls water treatment plant. Dioxin and other contaminants
migrated from Love Canal to the sewers, which had outfalls into nearby creeks. Approximately
950 families were evacuated from a 10-square-block area surrounding the canal. Approximately
10,000 people live within a mile of Love Canal; 70,000 live within 3 miles. The Niagara Falls
water treatment plant serves 77,000 people. The site is located 1/4 mile north of the Niagara
River.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal, State, and potentially
responsible parties' actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 10/23/81
Final Date: 09/08/83
Threats and Contaminants
The groundwater is contaminated with various volatile organic compounds (VOCs).
Creek and sewer sediments were contaminated with dioxins; however, these
contaminants have been removed. The soils in the original Love Canal landfill are
contaminated with VOCs including, toluene and xylenes; other organics, including
dioxins, poly cyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and pesticides; and heavy metals
including arsenic. The Niagara River and Black, Bergholtz, and Cayuga Creeks were
contaminated with VOCs and other organics. Direct contact with or ingestion of
contaminated water, sediments, or soils may present a risk. Contaminants have
leached into the Niagara River and people who use it for recreational activities may be
exposed to pollutants. In addition, the wildlife in or near the river may be affected.
February 1995
-------
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in seven stages: initial actions and six long-term remedial phases
focusing on the cleanup of the landfill containment; sewers, creeks, and berms; thermal treatment
of sewers and creeks; cleanup of the 93rd Street School; home maintenance; and property
acquisition.
Response Action Status
Initial Actions: In 1978, the New York State installed a system to collect leachate
from the site. The landfill area was covered and fenced and a treatment plant was
constructed. In 1981, the EPA erected a fence around Black Creek and conducted
environmental studies.
Landfill Containment: In 1982, the EPA selected a remedy to contain the landfill
by constructing a barrier drain and a leachate collection system; covering the
temporary clay cap with a synthetic material to prevent rain from coming into contact
with the buried wastes; demolishing the contaminated houses adjacent to the landfill, as well as a
nearby school; conducting more studies to determine the best way to proceed with cleanup; and
monitoring to make sure the cleanup activities are effective. In 1985, the State installed the 40-
acre cap, and improved the leachate collection and treatment system, including the construction of
a new treatment facility.
Sewers, Creeks, and Berms: In 1985, the EPA implemented a remedy to clean
up the sewers and the creeks by hydraulically cleaning sewers, removing and
disposing of the contaminated sediments, and inspecting the sewers for defects that
could allow contaminants to migrate; repairing a damaged floodgate; and limiting access,
dredging, and hydraulically cleaning the Black Creek culverts. The sediments from sewers and
creeks currently are being stored within the Occidental Chemical Corporation's Niagara Falls
facility and are awaiting final incineration. The State cleaned 62,000 linear feet of storm and
sanitary sewers in 1986. An additional 6,000 feet were cleaned in 1987. In 1989, Black Creek
and Bergholtz Creek were dredged of approximately 14,000 cubic yards of sediments. Clean
riprap was placed in the creeks' beds, and a grass sediment erosion berm was installed. Black
Creek and Bergholtz Creek were fenced.
Thermal Treatment of Sewers and Creek Sediments: In 1987, the EPA
selected a remedy to treat the contaminants in the sewers and creeks by constructing
an on-site facility to dewater and contain the sediments, plus constructing a separate
facility to treat the dewatered contaminants through high temperature thermal destruction; treating
the residuals stored on the site from the leachate treatment facility; and disposing of
non-hazardous residuals from the thermal destruction treatment on the site. In 1990, the State
completed the design of the technical specifications for thermally treating the contaminated
sediments in the sewers and creeks in 1990.
February 1 995 2 LOVE CANAL
-------
93rd Street School: The remedy selected by the EPA in 1988 to clean up the 93rd
Street School involved excavating about 7,500 cubic yards of contaminated soil
adjacent to the school. This remedy has been re-evaluated due to concerns raised by
the Niagara Falls Board of Education. An amendment to the remedy was made in 1991 selecting
excavation and off-site disposal of the contaminated soil as the alternative remedy. The State
finalized the technical design plans and specifications to excavate and transport the soil off-site.
Cleanup was completed in late 1992.
Home Maintenance: As a result of the contamination at Love Canal, the Federal
government and the State of New York purchased the affected homes. These
properties are being maintained to prevent their deterioration prior to resale. The
Love Canal Area Revitalization Agency (LCARA) is conducting the maintenance of the homes
under an EPA Cooperative Agreement. The properties are currently being maintained to prevent
deterioration prior to rehabilitation and resale, which is currently underway. Since the program
began, approximately 100 homes have been sold and more are under contract. Historically, there
have been delays in the home sale program due to the unwillingness of lending institutions to
approve mortgages. However, the Federal Housing Administration and the Department of
Housing and Urban Development are now insuring mortgages for homes sold through this
program.
Property Acquisition: EPA has provided $2.5 million for the purchase of
properties (businesses, rental properties, vacant lots, etc.) deemed to be distinct from
properties purchased with funds earlier awarded to LCARA. This property acquisition
is expected to end in 1995.
Site Facts: In 1989 Occidental Chemical Corporation, the Federal government, and the State
of New York, entered into a Consent Decree to delineate cleanup actions for the processing,
bagging, and storing of the creeks' sediments, as well as other Love Canal wastes, including the
sewer sediments. In addition, under a Cooperative Agreement with the EPA, LCARA is
conducting the maintenance of the affected homes.
Environmental Progress =j/=
Many cleanup activities, including landfill containment, home relocation, and treatment of
contaminants in sewers and creeks, have been completed at the Love Canal site. These completed
actions have eliminated surface contamination at the site, making the site safe to nearby residents
and the environment while final cleanup activities are being completed. As a result of the
completed actions, residents are returning to the Love Canal area.
Site Repository
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Public Information Office,
9820 Colvin Boulevard, Niagara Falls, NY 14304.
LOVE CANAL 3 February 1 995
-------
LUDLOW SAND ^
-------
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in two long-term remedial phases focusing on source control and the
cleanup of groundwater, surface water, and soils from adjacent areas.
Response Action Status
Source Control: In 1988, the EPA selected a remedy to contain the source of the
contamination by: consolidating approximately 10,000 cubic yards of contaminated
soil and sediment adjacent to the landfill and disposing of it in the landfill and then
placing either a clay or synthetic cover over it to prevent rain water from coming into contact
with the buried materials; collecting the leachate from seepage areas; dewatering the landfill, if
necessary, by using either a passive drain system or using groundwater extraction wells;
lowering the water table to prevent groundwater from coming into contact with the waste
material; treating the contaminated leachate and groundwater at an on-site facility, or if the
volume of water is small, transporting the water and leachate to an approved federal facility;
fencing the site, including the wetlands; controlling future use of the property by deed
restrictions; and monitoring the groundwater, private wells, and surface water to ensure the
cleanup has been effective. The cleanup is being conducted by the potentially responsible parties
in accordance with a State Consent Decree. Contaminated soils and sediments have been
excavated from the adjacent wetlands and gravel pit and consolidated in the landfill; the leachate
was collected from the seepage areas; a drainage system was installed and operated to dewater
the landfill; and a final cap was placed over the landfill. The collected water is being treated
using a system built on the site.
Groundwater, Surface Water, and Soils from Adjacent Areas: Data has
been collected on the nature and extent of off-site contamination. However, additional
data needs to be collected for groundwater and surface water in the vicinity of the
landfill, as well as soils from an adjacent gravel pit. This additional data collection, which will
be conducted by the potentially responsible parties with oversight by the State, is expected to
begin in 1994. The study will also evaluate different options for the cleanup of the off-site
contamination. Once the study is completed, a remedy for the groundwater and surface water
will be selected by the EPA.
Environmental Progress
After adding this site to the NPL, the EPA performed preliminary investigations and determined
that no immediate actions were required at the Ludlow Sand & Gravel site while further
investigatory studies were being completed and cleanup activities were being planned. Source
control actions have removed the potential for contact of the water with the contaminants and
therefore, have prevented further migration of contamination at the landfill into the environment.
November 1994 2 LUDLOW SAND & GRAVEL
-------
MALTA ROCKET E™ REG'ON 2
^__^_^ Saratoga County
ARF/V r—" ^ /^T~T1 Towns of Malta and Stillwater
NEW YORK I HLtfl Other Names:
IML.VV I wmx v L/_£=llJ Saratoga Research and
EPA ID# NYD980535124/\ /fcSf/ Development Center;
Rocket Fuel Site
Site Description
The 445-acre Malta Rocket Fuel Area site consists of the 165-acre Malta Test Station and 280
acres of undeveloped forest used as a safety easement for the Test Station. The Test Station was
established in 1945 by the U.S. Government for rocket engine and fuel testing and was first
leased by various agencies, including several departments of the military, and then purchased in
1955 by a predecessor of the Department of Defense. The site was also leased to NASA and used
for research and development projects conducted on behalf of the Department of Energy. The
General Electric Company operated the Test Station as a government contractor from 1945 to
1964. In 1964, the Test Station and the easement were acquired by a predecessor of the New
York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA). The General Electric
Company continued as operating contractor while NYSERDA and its predecessor conducted
similar atomic and space research and development at the Test Station. In 1984, NYSERDA sold
approximately 81 acres of the Test Station, including most of the original buildings, test areas,
rocket gantries, and other facilities to the Wright-Malta Corporation. Operations at the site
involved the use of hazardous substances. Investigations of soil, sludge, surface water, and
groundwater at the site have confirmed the presence of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and
polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). Numerous potential source areas have been identified at the
site, including scrap metal storage, chemical storage, solid waste disposal, drum disposal, and
fuel mixing areas; a burning pit; the rocket gantries and associated cooling pits; septic tanks and
leach fields; aboveground and underground storage tanks and piping systems; and the magazine
area. The population within a 2-mile radius of the site is approximately 10,000, which includes
all of the Luther Forest housing development. Water is supplied to area residents through the
public system, which draws groundwater from wells located 6,000 feet from the site.
o-* r, -UT* TU• • • u • AA A *u u NPL LISTING HISTORY
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through Proposed Date: 06/10/86
Final Date: 07/22/87
Federal and potentially responsible
parties' actions.
November 1994
-------
Threats and Contaminants
Groundwater at the site is contaminated with VOCs, PCBs, and boron from former
site activities. Off-site surface water is contaminated with VOCs, and soils are
contaminated with VOCs and PCBs. Direct contact with or ingestion of the
contaminated groundwater or surface water poses a health threat. Residents living
around the site may be exposed to contaminants by way of polluted groundwater, but
testing shows the public water supply wells are not contaminated. Discharges from the
site are entering the creeks and streams that flow toward the housing development.
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in a long-term remedial phase focusing on cleanup of the entire site.
Response Action Status
Entire Site: In 1989, some of the parties potentially responsible for the site
contamination began an extensive investigation to determine the nature and extent of
contamination and to identify alternatives for cleanup. The parties have installed an
Early Warning Monitoring System, which is designed to detect contamination emanating from the
site before it reaches public water supply wells. The investigation is scheduled to be completed in
early 1995, at which time, the EPA will select a cleanup remedy.
Site Facts: In 1989, the EPA issued a Unilateral Order for the performance of site studies to
eight potentially responsible parties.
Environmental Progress
After adding this site to the NPL, the EPA performed preliminary investigations and determined
that no immediate actions were required at the Malta Rocket Fuel site while further studies are
completed and cleanup is planned.
November 1 994 2 MALTA ROCKET FUEL AREA
-------
MARATHON BATTERY
CO.
NEW YORK
EPA ID# NYD010959757
EPA REGION 2
Putnam County
Cold Spring
Site Description
The 60-acre Marathon Battery Co. site includes a former nickel-cadmium battery plant and 11
surrounding acres, the Hudson River in the vicinity of the Cold Spring pier, and a series of river
backwater areas known as Foundry Cove and Constitution Marsh. The battery facility operated
from 1952 to 1979, producing military and commercial batteries. During this time, the plant
changed ownership several times, finally operating as the Marathon Battery Co. from 1969 to
1979. Before 1965, the plant's wastewater treatment system discharged into the Hudson River at
the Cold Spring pier through the use of the municipal sewer system, except during periods of
overload or system shutdown, when the wastewater was discharged directly into East Foundry
Cove. In 1965, the New York State Department of Health concluded that the new sewage
treatment plant being designed for Cold Spring could not handle the plant's industrial discharge.
The battery plant operators, therefore, began channeling the wastewater discharge into East
Foundry Cove. Although the potentially responsible parties dredged parts of Foundry Cove and
surrounding areas in 1972 and 1973, studies of the sediments and the wetlands in the late 1970s
still revealed high levels of cadmium and nickel. EPA has divided the site into three geographic-
al sub-sites to speed cleanup activities: East Foundry Cove Marsh and Constitution Marsh (Area
I); the 11-acre plant property, including the plant, a production well, a 500,000-gallon water
tower, a clay- and asphalt-lined underground vault containing the dredged cadmium-contaminated
sediment from Foundry Cove, and nearby residential yards (Area II); and East and West Foundry
Coves and the portion of the Hudson River near the Cold Spring pier (Area III). In 1980, the
battery plant was sold to Merchandise Dynamics for use as a warehouse to store books. Two
million books remained in the warehouse when all business activities at the facility ceased in
1986. The surrounding area is residential and includes a historic district. Approximately 400
people live within a mile of the site. A school, a mobile home park, and a number of residences
are served by groundwater within a 3-mile radius of the site. Local surface water is used for
both recreation and commercial fishing.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal, State, and potentially responsi-
ble parties' actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 10/01/81
Final Date: 09/01/83
November 1994
-------
Threats and Contaminants
The State found high levels of the heavy metals, including cadmium, zinc, nickel, and
cobalt, both inside and outside the plant facility. High concentrations of trichloroeth-
ylene (TCE) have been detected in the groundwater underlying the site. A State-super-
vised sampling program conducted in 1984 and 1985 revealed widespread heavy metal
contamination of the sediments and marsh soils of Foundry Cove. The highest levels
were found in East Foundry Cove Marsh at the outfall from which the battery
facility's process wastes were discharged. Cadmium was found in soils along the
fence line between the former battery facility and neighboring backyards. Tidal action
has been slowly flushing remaining cadmium deposits from the wetlands into the
Hudson River. High levels of cadmium are present in Foundry Cove sediments, and
cadmium is accumulating in the biota, threatening the marsh that supports several
surface and underwater plant species and the surrounding wildlife. The shortnose
sturgeon, an endangered species, migrates up and down the Hudson River and enters
East Foundry Cove to feed. Since this fish feeds on insect larvae on the cove bottom,
it is likely to eat contaminated sediments. Public health may be adversely affected by
eating fish or wildlife caught in contaminated waters. The threat associated with
inhaling, accidentally ingesting, touching contaminated soils or dusts, or eating foods
grown in contaminated soil has been eliminated through the cleanup actions taken at
the site.
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in four stages: immediate actions and three long-term remedial
phases focusing on cleanup of each of the three sub-site areas.
Response Action Status
Immediate Actions: In 1989, the potentially responsible parties placed fencing
and screens over the building's entrances and windows to limit access.
Area I Cleanup: In 1986, following the completion of a site investigation and
feasibility study to determine the nature and extent of the contamination at, and
emanating from, the Area I portion of the site and to evaluate cleanup alternatives, a
remedy was selected for cleaning up East Foundry Cove Marsh and Constitution Marsh. The
remedy features: dredging highly-contaminated sediments from East Foundry Cove Marsh;
chemically binding the sediment and properly disposing of the watery component; disposing of
the treated sediments off site; restoring the marsh by adding clean fill and clay and replanting;
and diverting storm sewers. Long-term sediment and water monitoring in East Foundry Cove
Marsh and Constitution Marsh, a public awareness program, and site access restrictions also will
be undertaken. EPA completed the engineering design for this remedy in early 1992. Area I
cleanup activities are underway and scheduled for completion in 1996.
November 1994 2 MARATHON BATTERY CO.
-------
Area II Cleanup: In 1988, following the completion of an investigation to determine
the nature and extent of the contamination at, and emanating from, the Area II portion
of the site and to evaluate remedial alternatives, a remedy was selected for cleaning
up Area II. The remedy features: decontaminating the inside surfaces and contents of the former
battery facility to remove dust containing heavy metals; excavating the cadmium-contaminated
soil on the plant grounds and neighboring yards; excavating the on-site vault containing dredge
spoils from the 1973 dredging; chemically binding, as needed, the excavated soil, dust, and vault
sediments and disposing of them at an EPA-approved facility off-site; backfilling the excavated
areas with clean fill; excavating the hot spots of VOC-contaminated soil, and cleaning and
replacing the treated soil on site; and placing groundwater use controls and monitoring the
aquifer until it is cleaned. EPA began designing the remedy for the residential yards in 1989. In
late 1990, the potentially responsible parties for site contamination completed a pilot study for
decontaminating the books in the warehouse. The decontamination of the interior of the ware-
house, including the books, was completed in the fall of 1992. The books were then taken off site
and recycled. The cleanup of the yards was completed in 1993. The design associated with the
excavation and treatment of the soil on the plant grounds was completed in early 1992. Cleanup
activities are being performed concurrently with Areas I and III and are scheduled for completion
in 1996.
Area III Cleanup: In 1989, a remedy was selected for this area that features
dredging 1 foot of sediments from East Foundry Cove and the Cold Spring pier area,
chemically binding them, and removing them from the site for disposal. No action
will be taken at West Foundry Cove, but it will be monitored. EPA began the engineering
design for this remedy in 1989; it was completed in early 1992. The cleanup of the contaminated
soils located on a beach adjacent to the Cold Spring pier was completed in 1993. Areas I, II,
and III are currently being cleaned up and are scheduled for completion in 1996.
Site Facts: EPA entered into an agreement with the potentially responsible parties in 1972 to
perform dredging operations and disposal of contaminated sediment into an on-site vault. In
1989, the potentially responsible parties were issued an Administrative Order to decontaminate
the interior of the building, including the stored books. In January 1992, a Consent Decree was
entered by the Court in which several of the potentially responsible parties agreed to a cash
settlement for Area II. In September 1992, an agreement was reached with the potentially
responsible parties in which one potentially responsible party will perform the cleanup of Areas I,
II and III, and the two remaining potentially responsible parties will pay a cash settlement. The
Consent Decree for this agreement was entered by the Court on April 1, 1993.
Environmental Progress
The residential yard soils excavation and building decontamination activities described above have
reduced the potential for exposure to hazardous materials at the site. The completion of the
ongoing cleanup activities, scheduled for 1996, will provide further protection to public health
and the environment.
MARATHON BATTERY CO. 3 November 1994
-------
MATTIACE ^* EP* RE -u-r* TU v, AA A .u u NPL LISTING HISTORY
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through Proposed Date- 06/24/88
Federal actions. Final Date: 03/3l/89
Threats and Contaminants
The groundwater and soil at the site are contaminated with VOCs. Exposure to
contaminated water and soil through direct contact, inhalation or ingestion is a health
hazard.
November 1994
-------
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in three stages: emergency actions and two long-term remedial
phases focusing on cleanup of the soil and groundwater cleanup and the buried drums.
Response Action Status
Emergency Actions: In 1988, EPA emergency workers secured the site, collected
samples, and removed 100,000 gallons of flammable liquids, 20,000 gallons of
contaminated water, and 1,800 gallons of liquids containing poly chlorinated biphenyls
(PCBs). Lab packs were crushed and sent to an off-site incineration facility. Owners reclaimed
cylinders and empty tanks. All other hazardous materials were transported to EPA-approved
disposal facilities.
Soil and Groundwater: The EPA undertook a comprehensive study of soil and
groundwater pollution at the site. A remedy was selected in 1991 involving in-place
vapor extraction of soil, limited excavation of soil hot spots, removal of above and
below ground tanks and cisterns, and groundwater pumping and treatment. Removal of tanks
and cisterns, and pumping and treatment of the most highly contaminated groundwater (the
floating product layer) began in 1994, and is scheduled to be completed in 1995. Soil cleanup is
scheduled for completion in 1997.
Buried Drums: After a geophysical survey that was conducted during field work to
determine soil contamination, the EPA found and characterized the contents of several
buried drums on the site. The EPA selected a remedy in 1990, which includes
removal and off-site treatment and disposal of the drums and contaminated soils in the area. In
the fall of 1991, the EPA began excavating buried drums and contaminated soil. Approximately
400 drums of hazardous wastes in various stages of decomposition were eventually excavated and
removed off site for treatment and disposal.
Environmental Progress
By securing the site, removing contaminated liquids, and excavating and removing buried drums
and soils, the EPA has reduced the immediate threats to nearby residents and the environment
while cleanup actions are underway.
November 1994 2 MATTIACE PETROCHEMICAL COMPANY, INC.
-------
MERCURY
REFINING, INC
NEW YORK
EPA ID# NYD048148175
Site Description
EPA REGION 2
Albany County
Albany
Since 1956, the 1/2-acre Mercury Refining, Inc. site has been used for reclaiming mercury from
batteries. Operators dumped waste batteries behind an on-site furnace building until 1980, when
these wastes were stored in drums on wooden pallets on paved areas of the site. Tests in the
early 1980s indicated that waste was at least 3 feet below the site surface. The State's Fish and
Wildlife Service tested soil in this area in the early 1980s and discovered high levels of
polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and mercury in soils and stream sediments. The source of the
PCBs is not clear, although the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
(NYSDEC) believes that the PCBs may be a byproduct of Mercury Refining's mercury
reclamation process. The site lies in a light industrial and commercial area. The closest residents
are located about 1/4 mile to the north of the site. Approximately 20,000 people live within a 1
1/2-mile radius of the property; 100,000 live within 3 miles. Local surface water is used for
recreation and as a drinking water supply. The nearest downstream supply intake is 1 mile away
from the site. A tributary to Patroons Creek, which flows to the Hudson River, runs next to the
site.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
State, and potentially responsible party
actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 12/30/82
Final Date: 09/08/83
Threats and Contaminants
Groundwater, surface water, sediments, and soil are contaminated with heavy metals
including mercury, zinc, nickel, and arsenic. The soils are also contaminated with
PCBs. Although most of the contaminated soil has been excavated and moved off-
site, additional contamination may remain. An unknown amount of contaminated soil
is located beneath an old furnace building on-site. In addition, air emissions of
mercury may pose additional risks. The risks to personal health include eating
contaminated fish and inhalation of mercury vapors.
November 1994
-------
Cleanup Approach
Mercury Refining, the potentially responsible party, will be required to remove an unknown
amount of contaminated soil under an old furnace building, located on-site. The potentially
responsible party also will be required to perform long term monitoring of on-site soil and
groundwater and off-site soil and sediments in Patroons Creek. Any soil or stream sediments
which are found to be contaminated will be cleaned up. In addition, the NYSDEC will issue the
potentially responsible party a hazardous waste permit, which will require assessment and cleanup
of any remaining contamination.
Response Action Status
Entire Site: Under a 1985 State Consent Order, the owner excavated and removed
about 2,100 cubic yards of mercury-contaminated soil and debris and 300 cubic yards
of PCB-contaminated soil. An unknown amount of contaminated soil was found
beneath the furnace building and was left in place after being sealed with plastic sheets. The site
was regraded with clean fill and capped to keep rainwater from spreading any remaining
contaminants. To date, the potentially responsible party has completed construction of a new
furnace building, which has state-of-the-art air pollution control equipment, and has developed
plans for on- and off-site monitoring and for excavating the contaminated soil under the old
furnace building. Further investigations and cleanup activities by the potentially responsible party
may be warranted and mandated for any remaining contamination at the site in the future.
Site Facts: In 1985, a State Consent Order required the Company to conduct cleanup activities
at the site. In 1989, the NYSDEC issued a Consent Order that required Mercury Refining to
curtail any further chemical releases from plant operations to the environment. On February 8,
1993, the NYSDEC issued the Company a third Consent Order, which requires cleanup of
contaminated soils on-site. The Order also requires long term monitoring of on-site groundwater
and soil and off-site soil and stream sediments in Patroons Creek.
Environmental Progress
The removal of mercury and PCB contaminated soils during 1985 addressed any immediate risks
posed by the site.
November 1994 2 MERCURY REFINING, INC.
-------
NEPERA CHEMICAL EP* RE?ION 2
Orange County
OOIV/IP/XIVIY IWf* -" ~/^~\ O 1 1/2 miles southwest of Maybrook
NEW YORK
EPA ID# NYD000511451
Site Description
The 23-acre Nepera Chemical Company site was once an industrial waste disposal facility.
Between 1953 and 1968, Nepera Chemical Company, Inc. used the property to dispose of wastes
from its Harriman plant, which produced pharmaceutical and other industrial chemicals. In 1953,
the State issued a permit to the site owners allowing them to discharge sewage or wastes into the
nearby waters. Nepera started waste disposal processes with two lagoons and expanded to six.
Discharge began at 50,000 gallons each week and declined to 7,000 gallons a week in 1967.
State inspectors detected leakage from the lagoons in 1958 and 1960. The owners and the EPA
found heavy metals, volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and phthalates in on-site test wells.
Because of the State's continuing concern about proper containment of the waste and the threat to
a local well field, Nepera discontinued operation of the lagoons in 1968. The last lagoon was
filled in 1974. The lagoons were situated in a narrow valley between two rock ridges. The
property is now covered with grass and is completely fenced. Approximately 6,500 people live
within a 3-mile radius of the site. Public water supply wells for Maybrook lie 800 feet north of
the site; the system consists of three wells and an infiltration gallery. Most residents outswe the
village rely on private wells, which tap local groundwater, for household uses. The nearest
residential well is about 500 feet west of the site. Beaverdam Brook runs through the site.
«v* D -U-1-* TT- - • ,. AA A u u NPL LISTING HISTORY
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through Proposed Date- 10/15/84
Federal, State, and potentially
responsible parties' actions.
Final Date: 06/10/86
Threats and Contaminants
Pyridines, a plastics by-product, and other compounds from chemical wastes have
been detected in groundwater monitoring wells and sludges on site. In addition, VOCs
and heavy metals such as lead, arsenic, cadmium, and mercury have been found in
groundwater and sludge. Surface water and sediment samples also contain pyridines
and VOCs. People could be harmed if they ingest contaminated water or come into
direct contact with contaminated water or soil.
November 1994
-------
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in two stages: immediate actions and a long-term remedial phase
focusing on cleanup of the entire site.
Response Action Status
Immediate Actions: All lagoons were filled by 1974 and a fence was constructed
to restrict access to the site.
Entire Site: In 1988, under a State-issued Order, the site owner began an intensive
study of soil and water pollution at the site. This investigation is exploring the nature
and extent of contamination problems at the site and will result in recommendations
for final cleanup. The EPA and the State approved the study work plan submitted by the owner
in 1990. Additional work has been proposed to address a lack of information needed to define
groundwater contamination. The investigation is expected to be completed in 1995.
Environmental Progress
By filling the waste lagoons and restricting access, the Nepera Chemical site has been made safer
while further investigations leading to the selection of final cleanup remedies are taking place.
November 1994 2 NEPERA CHEMICAL COMPANY, INC.
-------
NIAGARA COUNT
REFUSE
NEW YORK
EPA ID# NYD000514257
Site Description
EPA REGION 2
Niagara County
Wheatfield
Other Names:
Niagara County Refuse Disposal District
The 50-acre Niagara County Refuse site is an inactive landfill that was operated by the Niagara
County Disposal District from 1969 until 1976, when it was officially closed. Large amounts of
municipal and industrial solid and chemical wastes are buried on the site. Upon closure in 1976,
exposed refuse was covered with about 20 inches of soil and clay, and the site was graded. The
Town of Wheatfield acquired the site in 1976. The City of North Tonawanda, with a population
of 36,000 lies about 1/2 mile southeast of the site. Wheatfield's population is approximately
9,600. The marshy wetlands to the north of the site form the headwaters of Black Creek, which
flows into the Niagara River. Runoff from the site flows north into the creek or south into the
river. The Niagara River is the drinking water source for the city of Niagara Falls; its water
supply intake is about 3 miles downstream from the landfill. No known public or private wells
exist in the area; the water supply comes from outside the site vicinity. Local surface waters are
used for recreation.
Site Responsibility:
The site is being addressed through
Federal and potentially responsible
parties' actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 10/23/81
Final Date: 09/08/83
Threats and Contaminants
Ground water, soil, surface water, and sediments contain volatile organic compounds
(VOCs), semi-volatiles, pesticides, and heavy metals. Migration of these substances
from the site is tempered by the favorable geologic characteristics of the site. The
principal threats at the site are caused by leachate seeps. There is also evidence that
the soil and clay cap has deteriorated in spots, raising the potential for release of
VOCs and possible surface water erosion of wastes. There is a potential risk to human
health from accidental ingestion of groundwater. The risk will be compounded should
drinking water wells ever be installed adjacent to the site.
November 1994
-------
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in a single long-term remedial phase focusing on cleanup of the
entire site.
Response Action Status
Entire Site: The EPA began an intensive study of contaminants at the site in 1987. A
group of parties potentially responsible for the contamination at the site took over the
study in 1989. The EPA selected a remedy for the site in late 1993, which calls for
regrading the landfill, construction of a landfill cap meeting the standards for municipal waste
facilities in accordance with New York State regulations, construction of a leachate collection
system, off-site treatment of the collected leachate, construction of a gas venting system beneath
the cap, deed and access restrictions, and groundwater and surface water monitoring to track any
contaminant migration from the landfill.
Environmental Progress
After adding this site to the NPL, the EPA performed preliminary investigations and determined
that no immediate actions were required at the Niagara County Refuse site while further studies
leading to the selection of final cleanup remedies were taking place.
November 1994 2 NIAGARA COUNTY REFUSE
-------
NIAGARA MOHAWK __ EP£J£Qc™J2
PO\A/FR PO ' .-Hv^-U; Saratoga Springs
(SARATOGA
SPRINGS PLANT]
NEW YORK
EPA ID# NYD980664361
Site Description
The 7-acre Niagara Mohawk Power Co. (Saratoga Springs Plant) site initially was used for coal
gas manufacturing by the Saratoga Gas Light Company, a predecessor company of Niagara
Mohawk. The site was later used by various other companies from 1853 until the late 1940s.
By-product materials containing hazardous substances were disposed of at various locations at the
site, and the site's subsurface contains numerous coal tar waste deposits from these operations.
Niagara Mohawk has operated the site since 1950 as a multi-purpose service center including an
electric substation, natural gas facilities and offices, as well as vehicle and equipment repair,
maintenance, and storage facilities. Transformers and other electrical equipment that may contain
oil contaminated with polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) are periodically stored outside the
southwestern corner of the shop building at the site. The site is located in a primarily residential
area of Saratoga Springs. Approximately 10,000 people live within a 1-mile radius of the site and
receive their drinking water supply from the city of Saratoga Springs. Loughberry Lake is the
drinking water supply reservoir for the city of Saratoga Springs and is located 2,000 feet
upgradient of the site. Village Brook crosses the site and runs underground once it leaves the
site, until it meets Spring Run, approximately 500 feet southeast. Approximately 1,300 people in
trailer parks and other residents nearby obtain their drinking water from private wells located
within 3 miles of the site.
o-* D -u-r* TU- •* • u • AA A*. u NPL LISTING HISTORY
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through Proposed Date: 06/24/88
Federal and potentially responsible
parties' actions.
Final Date: 02/21/90
Threats and Contaminants
On-site groundwater is contaminated with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs)
and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) associated with coal tars. Sediments contain
PAHs, low levels of the pesticide DDT, and petrochemicals. On-site soils are
contaminated with PAHs and VOCs. Should site-related contaminants migrate into
sources of drinking water, area residents could be exposed to contaminants when
drinking or using that water. It is possible that area residents could be exposed to
contaminants located in the sediments of the Village Brook and Spring Run streams.
December 1994
-------
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in a single long-term remedial phase focusing on cleanup of the
entire site.
Response Action Status
Entire Site: In 1989, Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation began an investigation
into the nature and extent of site contamination. The investigation was completed in
early 1992. EPA reviewed the investigation report and additional field work was
performed in the summer of 1992. The resulting revised investigation report was received in late
1992. Based on the results of this investigation, cleanup technologies will be selected by the
EPA. The Stage II Archeological Data Recovery and Mitigation Results of the investigation,
regarding the possible historical value of several buildings at the site, was completed and fully
documented in November of 1993. Supplemental field work was performed in order to refine the
Feasibility Study of possible remedies. The Revised Feasibility Study was submitted in 1994,
and a remedy is scheduled to be selected in early 1995.
Site Facts: The EPA and Niagara Mohawk Corp. signed a Consent Order in 1989 that specifies
Niagara Mohawk's responsibilities for performing an investigation of site contamination.
Environmental Progress
After adding this site to the NPL, the EPA performed preliminary investigations and determined
that no immediate actions were required at the Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. (Saratoga Springs
Plant) site while further investigations are taking place.
December 1994 2 NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CO.
(SARATOGA SPRINGS PLANT)
-------
NORTH ^FA f~ _T EPA REGION 2
IMUKI N 5>tA L^^ffTWl Suffolk County
MUNICIPAL L"™™^^^ Southampton
NEW YORK
EPA ID# NYD980762520
Site Description
The 130-acre North Sea Landfill is an active municipal landfill that is owned and operated by the
Town of Southampton. It has been accepting refuse, construction debris, and septic system waste
since 1963. The site is separated into four areas: Cell #1, Cell #2, Cell #3, and former sludge
lagoons. Cell #1 was used for the disposal of municipal solid waste, refuse, and debris. Cell #2
is permanently closed, and Cell #3 is currently receiving municipal waste. Cells #2 and #3 are
controlled by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. Fourteen
scavenger lagoons were decommissioned in 1986 and have subsequently been filled with clean
fill. There is a plume of groundwater contaminated with heavy metals in an aquifer designated as
the sole source of drinking water in the area. In 1979, about a dozen private wells located within
the area of groundwater contamination were closed by the State. The area within 1 mile of the
landfill is residential, with a population of 1,500 people. The site is located near the southern
shore of Little Peconic Bay in an area with extensive ponds, coves, and wetlands. Groundwater
ultimately discharges into Fish Cove of the Peconic Bay. The Peconic Bay system is a major
recreational resource in this region.
Site Responsibility: This site was addressed through
Federal and potentially responsible
parties' actions.
Final Date: 06/01/86
Threats and Contaminants
The groundwater, sludge, and soil were contaminated with volatile organic compounds
(VOCs) and heavy metals. Water samples taken from Fish Cove showed the presence
of cadmium, a heavy metal. The potential on-site health threats of primary concern
were direct contact with or accidental ingestion of surface wastes. People could have
been exposed to contaminants through participation in recreational activities at Fish
Cove. Prior to site cleanup, wetlands might have been threatened by contamination.
December 1994
-------
Cleanup Approach
Response Action Status
Initial Action: Temporary emergency water was provided until 1981, when affected
homes were connected to the public water supply.
Cell #1, Cell #2, and Former Sludge Lagoon Area: Cleanup actions selected
by the EPA to address site contamination include closing Cell #1 and Cell #2, and
sampling sludge and soil to determine if hazardous materials are leaching from the
sludge lagoons. The parties potentially responsible for contamination of the site completed the
closure of Cell #1 in the fall of 1994. The Town of Southhampton has permanently closed Cell
#2. Sampling of soil and sludge was conducted in early 1992 which revealed that no hazardous
materials were leaching from the lagoons.
Off-Site Contamination: The Town of Southampton conducted an investigation
into the nature and extent of the off-site contamination. The investigation included
installing additional monitoring wells and resampling all existing wells to define the
contaminants. In 1992, the EPA decided that there was no threat posed and determined that no
further action was necessary to address off-site groundwater.
Site Facts: In 1987, the EPA and the Town of Southampton executed an order requiring the
Town to conduct a study into site contamination and to recommend final site cleanup actions.
Cell #2 has been closed as required in the State Administrative Order. In 1991, EPA and the
Town of Southampton executed a Consent Decree requiring the Town to implement the remedy
for Cell #1 and to conduct sampling of former sludge lagoons.
Environmental Progress
After adding this site to the NPL, the EPA performed preliminary investigations and determined
that, with the provision of alternative water to residents formerly using contaminated private
wells, no other immediate actions were required at the North Sea Municipal Landfill site.
Cleanup activities were completed in September 1994.
December 1994 2 NORTH SEA MUNICIPAL LANDFILL
-------
OLD BETHPAGE ^\ E™ RE™ON 2
f N Nassau County
LANDFILL ^ ^^^1 OyrterBay
NEW YORK
EPA ID# NYD980531727
Site Description
The 65-acre Old Bethpage Landfill is an inactive municipal landfill that is part of a sanitary
landfill complex that was active until 1986. The Town of Oyster Bay began operations at the Old
Bethpage Landfill in 1957, primarily for disposing of incinerator residue. In 1967, the town
began accepting garbage and trash and allowed home owners to dump trash. From 1968 through
1978, liquid and solid industrial process wastes and damaged drums containing organic residues
were disposed of at the site. Since 1978, metal hydroxide sludges have been the only industrial
waste disposed of at the landfill. The landfill was closed to further disposal in 1986. Several
groundwater recharge basins are used to dispose of scrubber water from incinerators. A methane
gas collection system was installed to prevent further off-site migration of landfill gas. Partial
landfill capping provides some barrier against groundwater contaminant migration. There are
approximately 10,000 people living within 1 mile of the site. The site is located above the
Magothy Aquifer, which supplies many public wells.
o-* r> -U-I-* TU- •* • u • AA A^ u NPL LISTING HISTORY
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through Proposed Date: 10/23/81
Federal, State, and potentially
responsible parties actions.
Threats and Contaminants
Final Date: 09/08/83
ZG
Air is polluted with methane gas and volatile organic compounds (VOCs). The
groundwater on site and leachate from the landfill are contaminated with heavy metals
including iron and manganese. The off-site groundwater is contaminated with VOCs.
The main health risks associated with this site are drinking contaminated groundwater
and inhaling contaminated air. The Village of Farmingdale uses the public drinking
water wells directly downstream of the landfill and could be threatened by the
contaminants.
January 1995
-------
Cleanup Approach
Response Action Status
Entire Site: In 1982, a methane gas collection system was installed by the town of
Oyster Bay to monitor and prevent migration of gas beyond the boundary of the site.
A leachate collection system designed to collect, store, treat, and dispose of the
leachate generated by the landfill has been operating at the landfill since 1983. A clay cap was
applied to 29 acres of the 65-acre site. As part of the EPA's 1988 remedy, the following
measures were selected to clean up groundwater contamination coming from the landfill and to
address the contaminant source control: installing, operating, and maintaining a system of
groundwater recovery wells and treating the recovered water by an air stripper and, if necessary,
carbon treatment; completing the covering of the landfill to prevent water from entering and thus
spreading contaminants; improvements to the leachate-collection system; improvements to the
methane gas collection system; and monitoring to determine the effectiveness of the cleanup
actions. Construction of the groundwater treatment system was completed in March 1992;
however, treatment will continue for several years. The last portion of the capping program was
completed in December 1992. The improvements to the leachate-collection system and the
methane gas collection system were completed in May 1992 and December 1992, respectively.
Based on the preliminary post-construction inspection and the final inspection that were conducted
in 1993, it was determined that cleanup construction for the entire site was completed and that
these activities were consistent with the selected remedy.
Site Facts: In May 1984, the town of Oyster Bay signed an interim Consent Decree agreeing to
conduct an investigation into the groundwater contamination at the site and to recommend
alternatives for cleanup of both on and off-site contamination. The final Consent Decree covering
the design and construction of the remedies selected by the EPA was approved by the court in
July 1988.
Environmental Progress
The cleanup actions, including the gas and leachate collection systems and the full capping of the
landfill, have reduced the potential for exposure to contaminated air, leachate, and groundwater
at the Old Bethpage Landfill site. The groundwater treatment system will further reduce any
potential threat to human health and the environment.
January 1995 2 OLD BETHPAGE LANDFILL
-------
OLEAN WELL
FIELD
NEW YORK
EPA ID# NYD980528657
EPA REGION 2
Cattaraugus County
Olean
Site Description
The 1 l/i-square-mile Olean Well Field site is comprised of three public wells, 50 private wells,
and municipal and industrial dumps that contain high levels of trichloroethylene (TCE).
Contamination of the areas was discovered in 1981. Much of the groundwater contamination is
believed to be the result of industrial operations at several nearby commercial establishments. The
public wells were constructed in the 1970s to alleviate the need for a surface water treatment
plant, which draws water from Olean Creek. After Olean city officials detected contamination of
the public wells, the City discontinued their use and reactivated the surface water treatment plant.
Site-related contaminants have migrated from shallow groundwater to deeper levels. The
groundwater located in the upper level flows toward and discharges into the Allegheny River.
Approximately 18,200 people live in the city of Olean.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal and potentially responsible
parties' actions.
IMPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 10/23/81
Final Date: 09/08/83
Threats and Contaminants
Three public wells and most residential wells are contaminated with TCE. Soil at the
manufacturing facilities is contaminated with TCE and other volatile organic
compounds (VOCs). Area residents may have been exposed to contaminants in their
drinking water and through direct contact.
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in three stages: immediate actions and two long-term remedial
phases, which are focusing on groundwater cleanup and controlling sources of contamination to
the groundwater.
November 1994
-------
Response Action Status
Immediate Actions: Thirty-two home carbon treatment units for drinking water
were installed on private wells and monitoring services were performed by the EPA
between 1983 and 1985. The New York State Department of Environmental
Conservation (NYSDEC) and the EPA developed an interim cleanup action that provided for
regular monitoring and the installation of additional carbon adsorption units as necessary, until a
permanent remedy was selected. In 1990, contaminated soil was excavated and removed during
the construction of an addition to an office building on-site.
Groundwater: Based on the results of the site investigation, the remedies selected to
clean up the site include: reactivating the municipal wells and treatment of the
groundwater using air strippers to reduce the TCE contamination to a level that
protects human health; extending the city waterlines from the Town of Olean to connect
approximately 93 residences currently served by wells; inspecting the McGraw-Edison industrial
sewer and performing any necessary repair or replacement; and recommending institutional
controls restricting withdrawal of contaminated groundwater for drinking purposes. Five thousand
feet of sewer lines have been replaced or cleaned. Work to extend the city's main waterline was
completed in 1989. The new water main also will provide hydrants and fire protection to the
targeted areas. Two air strippers were constructed at the municipal wells in 1989 and in 1990.
In the fall of 1993, the EPA determined the air strippers to be fully operational. The EPA
completed cleanup activities in the fall of 1994.
Source Control: In 1989, the EPA began an investigation to fully determine the
extent of contamination at three known contaminant source areas, to investigate 10
other potential source areas, and to determine appropriate cleanup actions. The study
is scheduled for completion in 1995.
Site Facts: In 1984, the EPA issued Unilateral Administrative Orders to six potentially
responsible parties, requiring them to perform an investigation of groundwater contamination.
These parties either currently own, or formerly owned and operated, commercial establishments
suspected of contributing to site contamination. The parties were issued a second Unilateral
Administrative Order in 1986 to treat groundwater contamination, to extend the City's main
waterline into the Towns of Olean and Portville, and to execute a supplemental investigation. In
1989, a potentially responsible party was issued an Administrative Consent Order to remove
contaminated soil before the construction of an addition to an office building. In June 1991, the
parties signed an Administrative Consent Order with the EPA to perform the source control
study.
Environmental Progress
The treatment of the groundwater and connection to city water supply lines has eliminated the
potential of exposure to hazardous substances in the drinking water. Investigations of the sources
of contamination are currently underway at the Olean Well Field site and will result in the
selection of final cleanup remedies.
November 1 994 2 OLEAN WELL FIELD
-------
ONONDAGA LAKE
NEW YORK
EPA ID# NYD9869135
Site Description
EPA REGION 2
Onondaga County
ity of Syracuse and Towns of Salina,
Geddes, and Camilus
Over time, a large increase in population and industrial growth in the areas surrounding
Onondaga Lake has led to its extensive biological, chemical, and physical damage. The
Onondaga Lake is about 4 1/2 miles long, and its average width is 1 mile. Seven major
tributaries flow into the Lake. Water flows out of the Lake, through a barge canal located at its
northwest end, and into the Seneca River. Historically, adjacent industrial processing plants and
municipal wastewater treatment plants routinely discharged their waste streams into the Lake.
One chemical manufacturing facility that discharged waste into the Lake is Allied Signal, Inc.
Two of Allied Signal's predecessors, Linden Chemicals and Plastics, Inc. (LCP) and the Hanlin
Group, which now owns LCP, also may have discharged waste into the Lake. There are at least
four sources of the contamination in the Lake. Allied Signal's Willis Avenue Plant and LCP's
Bridge Streec Plant both used a mercury cell process to manufacture chlorine, sodium hydroxide,
and potassium hydroxide. In both plants, these processes produced waste streams containing
heavy metals, such as mercury. A third source of the contamination is Allied Signal's Solvay
Waste Beds, which stored the by-products of the company's soda ash production process. A
fourth source is Allied Signal's Semet Residue Ponds, which contain volatile organic compounds
(VOCs) generated from acid washing of light oil. The Lake is immediately adjacent to industrial
properties and Onondaga County-owned parklands. Public fishing was banned from the Lake in
1970, but the Lake was opened to allow only catch-and-release fishing in 1986.
Site Responsibility:
The site is being addressed through
Federal, State, and potentially responsible
parties actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 05/10/93
Threats and Contaminants
Surface water is contaminated with mercury. Sediments are contaminated with
polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs); pesticides; creosotes; heavy metals, including lead,
cobalt, and mercury; polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; and VOCs. The groundwater
at the Willis Avenue Plant is contaminated. Several species of fish native to the Lake
have high concentrations of mercury, Touching or ingesting contaminated
groundwater, surface water, or sediments could pose a health threat.
September 1994
-------
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in a long-term remedial phase focusing on the cleanup of the entire
site.
Response Action Status
Entire Site: A full-scale investigation of the nature and extent of the contamination in
and around the Lake began in mid-1993. This investigation, planned for completion
in 1998, will lead to the selection of remedies for final cleanup of the site.
Site Facts: Although EPA's initial research into the roles of potentially responsible parties for
the site was limited to Allied Signal and its predecessors, the Agency has expanded its attempts to
identify additional parties who may have played a role in the Lake contamination. The New
York State Department of Environmental Conservation is taking action under Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) authorities against the Hanlin Group, which initiated
bankruptcy proceedings in mid-1991. In early 1992, Allied Signal signed a Consent Order
requiring the company to perform an in-depth study of the Lake and to identify alternative
cleanup remedies.
Environmental Progress
The EPA and the State of New York have determined that the site poses no immediate threat to
human health or the environment while initial site studies are underway.
Site Repository
Not yet established.
September 1994
ONONDAGA LAKE
-------
PASLEY
SOLVENTS
AND CHEMI
NEW YORK
EPA ID# NYD991 292004
Site Description
EPA REGION 2
Nassau County
Hempstead
Other Names:
Pasley Sales Corporation
The 1/2-acre Pasley Solvents and Chemicals site served as a chemical distribution facility from
1969 to 1982, occasionally storing waste chemicals. Prior to this, Commander Oil used the site
for gasoline storage and fuel oil distribution. The Nassau County Health Department (NCDH)
investigated the site in 1981 and found the ori-site soil and groundwater to be contaminated with
organic solvents and petroleum products. The NCDH ordered Pasley to clean up the site in 1982,
but the company went bankrupt and indicated they could not take responsibility for any cleanup
actions. Approximately 50 homes are located within 1,000 feet of the site. These homes are
supplied with water from the public distribution system. Approximately 19,000 people live within
a mile of the site. Over 110,000 people are served by municipal wells located within 3 miles of
the site.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal and potentially responsible
parties' actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 10/15/84
Final Date: 06/10/86
Threats and Contaminants
The groundwater is contaminated with various volatile organic compounds (VOCs).
Chlorinated solvents are contaminating the soil. The contaminated groundwater and
soil, if they are accidentally swallowed or touched, could be a health hazard to
individuals.
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in a single long-term remedial phase focusing on cleanup of the
entire site.
November 1994
-------
Response Action Status
Entire Site: An investigation to determine the nature and extent of contamination
was completed in early 1992. Monitoring wells were drilled to investigate the
contaminants in the soil and the groundwater and tanks were removed and destroyed.
A soil vapor contaminant assessment was conducted, as well as soil, sediment, and groundwater
sampling. The EPA selected a remedy for final cleanup in 1992. The selected remedy entails
vacuum extraction and flushing of contaminated soils, and air stripping of contaminated
groundwater. The design of the remedy is currently underway.
Site Facts: In 1988, the EPA sent out Notice Letters to two potentially responsible parties,
informing them of their responsibility in the site cleanup operations. One of the parties has filed
for bankruptcy and has indicated that it would be unable to take responsibility for the site
cleanup. Notice Letters were mailed to the same responsible parties on July 30, 1992 to
determine if they were interested in implementing the selected remedy. Both parties have refused
to perform the remedy, claiming that they are not financially viable. Currently, the EPA is
reviewing their financial viability. The design of the remedy was funded by the EPA in early
1993. Since then, one potentially responsible party has requested that the EPA evaluate the
innovative air sparging technology as an option for addressing the groundwater at the site. The
potentially responsible party indicated that the air sparging technology was more cost effective
than the remedy selected by the EPA. An air sparging pilot study was performed by the
potentially responsible party in late 1993. The pilot study report was submitted to the EPA in
early 1994 and the EPA is in the process of reviewing the report to determine if the technology is
effective for the site and if changes should be made to the previously selected remedy.
Environmental Progress
After adding this site to the NPL, the EPA performed preliminary investigations and determined
that no immediate actions were required at the Pasley Solvents and Chemicals, Inc. site while
plans for implementing final cleanup remedies are completed.
November 1994 2 PASLEY SOLVENTS AND CHEMICALS, INC.
-------
PFOHL BROTHE
LANDFILL
NEW YORK
EPA ID# NYD98050
Site Description
EPA REGION 2
Erie County
Cheektowaga
The Pfohl Brothers Landfill site is a 167-acre property located 1/2 mile east of the Buffalo
International Airport. This privately owned and operated landfill accepted municipal and
industrial wastes from 1932 until 1971. When the landfill was active, it received chemical wastes
in liquid, solid, and sludge forms from local businesses, such as paint manufacturers,
electroplaters, printers, and other industries that used solvents and petroleum. The landfill
operators buried some of this waste in drums and placed the remaining wastes directly into
excavated areas of the facility. The wastes deposited included heavy metals, such as mercury and
barium, and volatile organic compounds (VOCs), such as benzene and dioxin. A trucking firm
currently occupies the now-graded northern portion of the landfill. Access to most of the site is
restricted by a fence, but drainage ditches contaminated with runoff from the landfill lie outside
of the fenced area and are accessible to the public. Aero Lake lies adjacent to and north of one
drainage ditch. Another drainage ditch discharges into Ellicott Creek. Both the lake and the
creek are used by the community for recreational fishing. Ten homes are located within 200 feet
of an area of contaminated soil. The area near the landfill is residential and commercial.
Site Responsibility:
The site is being addressed through
Federal, State, Local, and potentially
responsible parties actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 05/10/93
Threats and Contaminants
II
Surface water both on- and off-site is contaminated by VOCs, including benzene,
benzene compounds, and phenol. On-site and off-site soil is contaminated with
polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and heavy metals, such as mercury. Most of the site
is fenced to restrict access; however, drainage ditches containing leachate from the site
lie outside the fencing and are accessible to the public. Wetlands and several lakes and
creeks used for recreational fishing border the site. Another wetland was located on
what is now the central portion of the property.
September 1994
-------
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in a long-term remedial phase focusing on the cleanup of the entire
site.
Response Action Status
*v
Entire Site: A full-scale investigation of the nature and extent of the contamination in
and around the landfill will begin shortly.
Environmental Progress
The EPA and the State of New York have determined that it poses no immediate threats to the
public or the environment while further site studies leading to the selection of cleanup remedies
are being planned.
Site Repository
Not yet established.
September 1994
PFOHL BROTHERS LANDFILL
-------
PLATTSBURGH ™GK>N 2
Clinton County
AIR FORCE BASE Pattsbugh
NEW YORK
EPA ID# NY4571924774
Site Description
The 3,440-acre Plattsburgh Air Force Base site served as a tactical wing in the Air Force
Strategic Air Command from 1955 to 1991 when it was redesignated as an Air Refueling Wing.
From 1955 to 1987, hazardous wastes were generated from activities such as aircraft maintenance
and painting, fire fighting exercises, spills, and the discharging of munitions. The base used four
unlined landfills for disposal of household wastes and construction debris; hazardous wastes also
appear to have been disposed of in the landfills. Hazardous wastes were also burned in unlined
pits as part of fire training exercises at the base. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were
found in shallow monitoring wells downgradient of the maintenance/storage area during tests
conducted by the Air Force in 1987. The Air Force subsequently conducted preliminary field
investigations into site contamination that included sampling of soil, groundwater, and surface
water at several areas. The site is located in a mixed-use area consisting of industries,
commercial enterprises, and private residences. It is bordered on the north by the Saranac River
and the city of Plattsburgh, and on the south by the Salmon River. Lake Champlain is located
less than one half mile east of the site. Approximately 2,000 people obtain drinking water from
private wells located within 3 miles of the site.
_.. 0 ...... _...,. ,, , , , NPL LISTING HISTORY
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through Proposed Date- 07/14/89
Federal actions. Final Date: 11/21/89
Threats and Contaminants
Groundwater downgradient of the maintenance/storage area was found to be
contaminated with VOCs. Soils contaminated with the pesticide DDT were also found
at this area, apparently due to leakage from drums containing DDT that were
previously stored at this area. Leachate from two of the landfills is contaminated with
VOCs, including fuel-related compounds and pesticides. Fuel-related compounds and
chlorinated solvents associated with activities at the Fire Training Area have
contaminated soils and groundwater, including the accumulation of a significant
quantity of "free product" at the groundwater surface. Potential exposures include
direct contact with contaminants found in soil and groundwater. Lake Champlain, the
Salmon River, and the Saranac River could be negatively impacted due to contaminant
migration.
December 1994
-------
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed through initial (removal) actions as well as several long-term remedial
phases focusing on cleanup of the entire site.
Response Action Status
Initial Actions: Soils contaminated with DDT were excavated from the maintenance
storage area early 1992. In late 1992, a tank containing waste waters from pesticide
containers and application equipment washing was emptied and removed, and a tank
containing wastewaters from airplane painting and washing operations was emptied and filled
with concrete. The removal and treatment system for the fuel and chlorinated solvents found at
the groundwater surface of the fire training area began operations in April 1993. Lead
contaminated soils located at the base firing range were removed in 1993.
Landfills: Two of the landfills that formerly received household and construction
waste were designated as priority sites at the base. VOCs have been detected in
groundwater monitoring wells and leachate downgradient from these landfills. A study
of the sites to determine the full extent of contamination was conducted and the cleanup remedies
selected include capping both landfills and periodic groundwater monitoring. Construction of the
caps began in late 1992, and is scheduled to be completed in 1995.
DRMO - Maintenance Storage Area: The Department of Defense (DoD) has
conducted studies of soil and potential groundwater contamination in the
maintenance/storage area. These studies were completed in 1992. The removal of
DDT contaminated soils was completed at the site in 1992. It is expected that no further action
will be required at this site. Site evaluations will be performed every five years.
Fire Training Area: Soil and groundwater at the fire training area are contaminated
with petroleum products and solvents. Bioventing, which began in 1993, is being
used to test the proposed remedy for soil cleanup. A cleanup remedy will be selected
for the groundwater when the study of the nature and extent of its contamination is completed in
1995.
PA/SI Sites: Assessments for eleven additional areas were conducted during 1993.
Investigations have been completed at six of these areas and the remainder are
expected to be completed by 1998.
Attachment l/ll: Investigations to determine the nature and extent of contamination
for seven areas began in 1992 and are expected to be completed in 1996.
Additional Areas of Concern: Investigations into the nature and extent of
contamination began in 1992 for the following areas: Civil Engineering Squadron
Pesticide Tank; Golf Course Drainage Site; Flightline and Industrial Area; Landfill
21; Heavy Equipment Maintenance Facility Site; Munitions Maintenance Squadron; and Nose
Dock 8.
December 1994 2 PLATTSBURGH AIR FORCE BASE
-------
Site Facts: Plattsburgh Air Force Base was formerly participating in the Installation Restoration
Program established by the DoD in 1978 to identify, investigate, and control hazardous
contaminants at DoD facilities. The base was slated for closure in 1993 under the Defense Base
Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (BRAC). As a result of Presidential decision,
environmental cleanup is being expedited to promote early re-use by the community under the
BRAC program.
Environmental Progress
The planned activities to remove contaminants from soils and groundwater will reduce the
potential for exposure to these materials. Results of a number of the investigations and
assessments will be finalized during 1995, and cleanup remedies will be selected based on these
findings.
PLATTSBURGH AIR FORCE BASE
December 1994
-------
POLLUTION
ABATEMENT
SERVICES
NEW YORK
EPA ID# NYD000511659
EPA REGION 2
Oswego County
Oswego
Site Description
The 15 1/2-acre Pollution Abatement Services (PAS) site served as the location for a chemical
waste incineration facility from 1970 to 1977. The facility consisted of three lagoons containing
over a million gallons of oil and mixed hydrocarbons, several large storage tanks containing
contaminated waste oil, and more than 15,000 leaking and deteriorating drums. Throughout the
operation of the facility, PAS experienced operational problems and was cited for numerous air
and water quality violations by state and federal agencies. During this time, liquid wastes were
collected and stored in on-site drums, open lagoons, and in aboveground and underground tanks.
From 1973 to 1976, lagoon overflows and liquid waste spills were common, and wastes were
released into the adjacent Wine Creek, which flows into Lake Ontario. During this period, the
U.S. Coast Guard, EPA, and the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
(NYSDEC) became involved in a number of immediate cleanup activities. Following the closure
of the site, all hazardous wastes were removed. Approximately 24,000 people reside within 3
miles of the site. The immediate area is sparsely populated and is zoned primarily for commercial
and industrial activity. The Oswego municipal water treatment plant has a surface water intake
system on Lake Ontario approximately 1 mile from the point where Wine Creek enters the lake.
Municipally-supplied water has been made available to residents, but several have opted to
continue using private wells.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal, State, and potentially responsi-
ble parties' actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 10/23/81
Final Date: 09/08/83
Threats and Contaminants
ZDJ
The on-site groundwater is contaminated with various heavy metals and volatile
organic compounds (VOCs). The on-site soil is contaminated with polychlorinated
biphenyls (PCBs). Sludges are contaminated with PCBs and heavy metals. The
potential exists for health risks if contaminated groundwater is accidentally ingested or
touched. Wine Creek and a wetland area, which lie immediately northeast of the site,
were threatened by contaminants from the site.
November 1994
-------
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in four stages: immediate actions and three long-term remedial
phases focusing on cleanup of surface contamination, the entire site, and off-site contamination.
Response Action Status
Immediate Actions: In 1976, EPA constructed a dike to prevent an overflow of
contaminants from entering the groundwater and soil in the surrounding area. In
1977, EPA treated and discharged the contaminated water from the lagoons. A fence
with a locked gate was constructed around the site in 1980 to keep unauthorized individuals from
entering. That same year, EPA overpacked and relocated 500 drums on-site. An additional 1,200
drums were overpacked in 1981, and surface runoff controls were installed. The site was covered
with a clay cap, topsoil, and vegetation.
Surface Contamination: In 1982, EPA removed superstructures and 10,000 drums
of contaminants from the site. In 1987, 500,000 gallons of contaminated groundwater
were pumped from the site and sent off site for treatment. All surface cleanup
activities have been completed.
Entire Site: Based on the results of an investigation into the extent and source of
contamination, EPA selected the following remedy for site cleanup: limited excavation
and removal of contaminated soil, as well as the removal of subsurface tanks and
remaining drums to a federally approved landfill; construction of a perimeter slurry wall; site
grading followed by installation of an impermeable cap; groundwater recovery; leachate
collection; on-site treatment of the leachate and contaminated groundwater; and groundwater
monitoring. These cleanup activities, with the exception of the on-site treatment system, were
completed in 1986. Extracted leachate and groundwater (approximately 15,000 gallons every two
weeks) is transported from the containment system to an approved treatment and disposal facility
until a permanent treatment system is constructed.
Post-Closure Investigations: Post-closure investigations indicated the presence of
aromatic and chlorinated VOCs in the groundwater outside of the containment system.
Under EPA supervision, the potentially responsible parties completed an investigation
to determine the nature and extent of this groundwater contamination and to identify cleanup
actions. The investigation was completed in the fall of 1993, and EPA selected a remedy that
includes bedrock pumping and enhancement of the present source control system by optimizing
operating parameters.
Site Facts: In 1990, the potentially responsible parties signed an AOC with EPA to undertake
an investigation into the nature and extent of the contamination located outside the slurry wall
surrounding the site. In September 1991, EPA and a group of potentially responsible parties
entered into an interim groundwater and leachate removal Administrative Order on Consent
(AOC). This AOC requires routine removal of leachate and groundwater from within the
containment system until a permanent treatment system is constructed.
November 1994 2 POLLUTION ABATEMENT SERVICES
-------
Environmental Progress
The immediate and long-term cleanup actions undertaken at the site have successfully met the
established goals for cleanup of surface contamination at the site, while further studies and clean
up activities related to contamination detected outside the containment system are taking place.
The State is continuing to ensure that drinking water standards are maintained through regular
groundwater monitoring.
POLLUTION ABATEMENT SERVICES
November 1994
-------
PORT
WASHINGTON
LANDFILL
NEW YORK
EPA ID# NYD980654206
Site Description
EPA REGION 2
Nassau County
North Hempstead
Other Names:
of North Hempstead L-4 Landfill
The Port Washington Landfill site is a 54-acre inactive portion of a 139-acre inactive municipal
landfill. Since the 1880's, the site was used as a sand and gravel mining operation.
Subsequently, the property was used as a disposal area for construction debris. In 1973, the
Town of North Hempstead purchased the property and operated it as a municipal landfill until
closing it in 1983. Operation of the landfill during the 1970s resulted in the generation of an
off-site soil gas plume composed of methane and volatile organic compounds (VOCs). In 1981,
Southport Water District Well No. 5, located about 1,500 feet west of the landfill, was closed
due to evidence of organic chemical contamination. There are approximately 4,500 people living
within 1 mile of the landfill. Residential areas adjacent to the landfill are served by the Port
Washington Water District. The closest public water supply well is located 2,000 feet south of
the landfill. The aquifers of primary concern are the upper glacial, the Magothy, and the Lloyd
aquifers. The landfill is bordered to the east by Hempstead Harbor. Site access is limited by
fencing and security.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal, local, and potentially
responsible party actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 12/30/82
Final Date: 09/08/83
Threats and Contaminants
Vinyl chloride has been detected in the on-site soil gas at high concentrations. Other
VOCs have been detected in off-site ambient air and in the gas built up under the
landfill surface. Groundwater and leachate are contaminated with various VOCs.
People are potentially at risk by drinking or otherwise coming in direct contact with
contaminated ground water. As a result, the nearest public water supply well
(Southport) has been taken out of service as a precaution against possible
contamination, although no contaminants have been detected in (his well since
February 1981. The potential health threat to people resulting from recreational use of
contaminated water or eating contaminated fish is minimal.
November 1994
-------
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in two phases: immediate actions and a long-rterm remedial action to
address contamination at the entire site.
Response Action Status
Immediate Actions: In 1990, under an EPA Administrative Order, the Town
installed a perimeter gas collection and venting system on the southern portion of the
site to prevent the migration of landfill gas into an industrial park.
Entire Site: In 1989, EPA selected the following remedies to address site
contamination: closure of the landfill; rehabilitation of the active gas collection system
and additional perimeter venting; air stripping; and installation of additional
groundwater extraction wells for the purpose of restricting further migration of contaminants in
the groundwater. In 1991, the Town installed two ground flares to accommodate the increased
landfill gas volume anticipated when the entire venting system for the site is implemented. The
rehabilitation and expansion of the existing gas extraction system is underway. The design of the
landfill cap is expected to be complete in late 1994. The design of the groundwater extraction
and treatment remedy is underway.
Site Facts: A Consent Decree was signed by the EPA and the Town in 1990 for the Town to
clean up the site. Also during 1990, the Town and the EPA signed an Administrative Order
under which the Town agreed to install additional gas vents to prevent subsurface gas migration
into a nearby industrial park.
Environmental Progress
The installation of a perimeter gas collection system and ground flares have reduced the potential
for exposure to hazardous substances at the Port Washington Landfill site while further cleanup
activities are being planned.
November 1994 2 PORT WASHINGTON LANDFILL
-------
PREFERRED PLATING EPA REGION 2
Suffolk County
CORPORATION
NEW YORK
EPA ID# NYD980768774
Site Description
The 3/4-acre Preferred Plating Corporation site was the location of plating operations from 1951
until 1976, when the company filed for bankruptcy. The property was subsequently sold, and in
1982, the new owner filled in the leaching pits and constructed a building over them. The
leaching pits had been severely cracked and were leaking, allowing discharges into the
groundwater. The primary activities at the site included chemically treating metal parts to
increase corrosion resistance and to provide a cohesive base for painting. The plating processes
included degreasing, cleaning, and surface finishing of metal parts. These processes involved the
use of various chemicals and resulted in the generation, storage, and disposal of hazardous waste.
Untreated wastewater, produced by rinsing the metal parts between each process, was discharged
to four concrete leaching pits directly behind the original building. An automobile repair shop
and other businesses now occupy the site. There are approximately 4,500 people within 1 mile of
the site. Approximately 15,000 people draw drinking water from wells within 3 miles of the site.
_. _ ..... r™ • • • u • AA ja. v. NPL LISTING HISTORY
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through Proposed Date: 10/15/84
Final Date: 06/10/86
Federal, State and potentially
responsible parties' actions.
Threats and Contaminants
Groundwater and soils underlying the site are contaminated with heavy metals
including cadmium, chromium, lead, and nickel. Low levels of chlorinated organics
and cyanide also were detected in a few groundwater samples. There is a potential
risk to human health by drinking or coming into direct contact with contaminated
groundwater and by inhalation of contaminated groundwater vapors.
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in three long-term remedial phases focusing on on-site groundwater,
on-site soils, and upgradient groundwater.
November 1994
-------
Response Action Status
On-site Groundwater: In 1989, EPA selected remedies to address groundwater
cleanup including pumping and treating of groundwater to remove metals
contaminating the groundwater and reinjecting the clean groundwater into the aquifer.
The design for the remedy was completed in 1992. Construction of the groundwater treatment
system is expected to begin in 1995.
On-site Soils: EPA conducted a study into the nature and extent of soil
contamination underlying the Preferred Plating property. In 1992, EPA selected on-
site excavation and off-site treatment of approximately 1,050 cubic yards of soils
contaminated with heavy metals and low levels of organics. Cleanup was completed in 1994.
Upgradient Groundwater: A potentially responsible party conducted an
investigation into the nature and extent of potential groundwater contamination
upgradient of the site to determine if there are any sources contributing to the on-site
contamination. The investigation was completed in mid-1993. EPA, in consultation with the
State, determined that the levels of contaminants detected in groundwater upgradient of the site
do not pose a significant threat to human health or the environment and, therefore, cleanup is not
needed. A "No Action" remedy was selected in the fall of 1993.
Site Facts: EPA sent Notice Letters to the parties potentially responsible for the site
contamination for the cleanup of the groundwater in 1988, but received no reply. A Special
Notice Letter was issued to an additional party in 1990 for the off-site contamination. An
Administrative Order on Consent between EPA and the potentially responsible party was signed
in late 1990, requiring the party to investigate the upgradient groundwater portion of the off-site
contamination. In the summer of 1993, EPA issued a Unilateral Administrative Order to the site
owners, requiring them to implement the soil cleanup called for in the 1992 remedy.
Environmental Progress
After adding the site to the NPL, EPA conducted investigations that showed that while the site
poses no immediate threats to human health or the environment, the potential does exist for
contamination of the drinking water supply if no action is taken. To ensure the contamination
does not spread, construction of a groundwater cleanup system is being planned and excavation
of contaminated soils has been completed.
November 1994 2 PREFERRED PLATING CORPORATION
-------
RADIUM CHEMICAt-^ EP* RE?l°tN 2
/^ x;^ ^X Queens County
COMPANY IISIC^ >TT1 Woodside/Queens
NEW YORK
EPA ID# NYD001667872
Site Description
The Radium Chemical Company, Inc. (RCC) site consists of an abandoned building located on
approximately 1/3 acre of land at 60-06 27th Avenue in Queens. From the mid-1950s through
1983, the company leased specially packaged radium to hospitals for use in the treatment of
cancer. When it was abandoned, the facility contained a large quantity of radium-226 sealed in
small metal tubes or rods referred to as "needles", totalling approximately 120 curies. In 1983,
the State ordered the company to stop its business operations due to a series of regulation
violations. State inspections disclosed violations involving lost shipments of needles, radiation
levels exceeding allowable standards within the plant, and elevated radon levels, indicating
microscopic defects in the needles. The company ceased any further leasing of radioactive
sources, but the missing needles were not accounted for, and conditions at the plant did not
improve. In 1987, the State ordered RCC to remove its inventory of radioactive sources and to
decontaminate the work site. In 1988, a State judge declared the RCC site officially abandoned.
Approximately 300,000 people reside within 3 miles of the site. The majority of the surrounding
area is composed of light industry and small businesses, with some residential areas within 1/2
mile of the site. The Brooklyn-Queens Expressway is less than 10 feet from the site. A large
health club is located within 100 feet of the RCC facility.
ev* D -u-r* TU• v AA A *, u NPL LISTING HISTORY
Site Responsibility: This site was addressed through proposed Date; Og/16/g9
Federal actions.
Final Date: 11/21/89
Deletion Date: 03/24/95
Threats and Contaminants
The building interior was contaminated with residual radium and radon gas from the
former site operations. A potential threat from the possible inhalation of radon gas
and exposure to gamma radiation existed, if people entered the building on the site.
November 1994
-------
Cleanup Approach
Response Action Status
Immediate Actions: During the summer of 1989, all of the "needles" on site were
repackaged to prevent the release of radioactivity and were removed in five
shipments to an outside facility dedicated to the disposal of radioactive wastes. In late
summer of 1989, approximately 200 containers of non-contaminated flammables, poisons, and
other reactive chemicals were sent for incineration and disposal. One shipment of highly
contaminated debris, tools, and other materials found in the building also was sent to the off-site
facility. In the fall of 1989, four shipments of low-activity contaminated debris were sent to a
radioactive waste disposal facility; 500 pounds of elemental mercury found in the building were
recycled and sent to another outside facility. Stringent operating and monitoring procedures to
maintain public safety have been followed throughout the immediate actions. Twenty-four hour
security at the site was maintained throughout the cleanup action. A foam fire suppressant
system also was in place to reduce the risk of explosions and fires.
Entire Site: In early 1990, the EPA prepared a study that outlines the nature and
extent of contamination remaining at the site and describes the various cleanup
alternatives evaluated. The EPA selected the final site remedy, which consists of
partial decontamination of the building, followed by its complete dismantling and disposal in
appropriate facilities. Cleanup actions began in late 1990. Contaminated soils which were
beneath or adjacent to the building were excavated and shipped off-site for disposal.
Contaminated materials were disposed of in a radioactive waste repository. Contaminated lead
and steel were transported to a nuclear processing facility which recycles material back into the
nuclear industry. Cleanup was completed in late 1994.
Site Facts: In July 1988, at the request of the State, the Supreme Court in Queens issued an
order finding that the company and its president could not perform their obligations and duties to
secure the plant adequately. The Attorney General also prosecuted the company for criminal
violations of the State labor law. In February 1989, the company was convicted of four
violations and was fined the maximum amount permitted by statute.
Environmental Progress
Through immediate removal actions and the decontamination, dismantling and disposal of the
entire site, the potential for exposure to hazardous waste has been eliminated. The site has been
deleted from the NPL.
November 1994 2 RADIUM CHEMICAL COMPANY, INC.
-------
RAMAPO LANDFI
NEW YORK
EPA ID# NYD000511493
EPA REGION 2
Rockland County
Route 59,
1 mile northeast of the
Village of Hillburn
Site Description
The Ramapo Landfill is a 96-acre site which began accepting wastes in 1972. In 1978, the New
York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) denied the landfill operators
an operating permit because of an incomplete permit application and violations of state codes.
The facility is reported to have received sludge from a cosmetic company, sludge-like material
from a pharmaceutical company, and paint sludges from an automobile manufacturer, as well as
wastes from other facilities. Unauthorized dumping also may have occurred at the site. In 1980,
about 50 drums containing an unknown waste were found near the site. Most of the landfill now
is covered and graded. An existing leachate collection system diverts surface and subsurface
leachate from the landfill to a holding pond. Wastewater from the holding pond is discharged to
the wastewater treatment plant in the Village of Suffern. Groundwater data show the presence of
various metals and organics. Although the landfill is legally closed, the Town of Ramapo still
disposes of brush and debris on the site. Approximately 50,000 people reside within 3 miles of
the site; about 200 people live within one mile. Four public water supply wells, serving the
Spring Valley Water Authority systems and potentially affecting 200,000 users, are located within
1,500 feet west of the site just across the Ramapo River.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal, State, and municipal actions.
IMPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 12/30/82
Final Date: 09/08/83
Threats and Contaminants
The groundwater is contaminated with volatile organic compounds (VOCs), including
benzene, toluene, and xylene and heavy metals, including mercury, lead, chromium,
and cadmium. Surface water is contaminated with heavy metals, semi-volatile
compounds, and phenols. Health risks may occur if contaminated groundwater or
surface water were accidentally ingested or touched. Inhaling airborne contaminated
vapors from surface water and particulates from on-site soils also may pose a potential
health threat. Use of contaminated groundwater for bathing, showering, or cooking
may cause inhalation of VOCs that evaporate from the contaminated groundwater.
November 1994
-------
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in a long-term remedial phase focusing on cleanup of the entire site.
Response Action Status
Entire Site: The Town of Ramapo, under State authority, undertook an investigation
to determine the nature and extent of contamination at the site and to evaluate cleanup
alternatives. In early 1992, EPA selected a remedy calling for capping of the landfill
using a multi-media system, installing groundwater extraction wells to supplement the existing
leachate collection system, and discharging of the collected leachate and groundwater to a
publicly-owned treatment works facility for treatment. The Town of Ramapo completed the
design of the selected remedy in the summer of 1994. Construction is underway and is expected
to be completed in early 1996.
Site Facts: The State entered into an Administrative Order on Consent on February 8, 1985
with the Town of Ramapo to construct a final leachate treatment system. On February 1, 1988,
the State and the Town of Ramapo signed an Administrative Order on Consent which required
the Town of Ramapo to conduct a cleanup investigation and to undertake site cleanup activities.
Environmental Progress
After adding the Ramapo Landfill site to the National Priorities List, EPA conducted a prelimi-
nary evaluation and determined that no immediate cleanup actions were required at the site while
cleanup activities are taking place.
November 1994 2 RAMAPO LANDFILL
-------
RICHARDSOI] V EP*REGION 2
:::;.'. .^^..-^ ..j^J ) f~7^ Delaware County
HILL RO/XD ^'•'''•'•""'"•"" -:lUr1^^&-^£/-1 2% m'les southwest of Sidney Center
Other Names:
Bendix Waste Oil and Disposal Site
NEW YORK
EPA ID# NYD980507735
Site Description
The Richardson Hill Road Landfill/Pond site covers 8 acres and contains a landfill that is
composed of two sections. The first section is in the northern portion of the site; it contains two
trenches. The second section, located to the south of the first, contains a waste oil pit. From
1964 through 1969, the Bendix Corporation disposed of hazardous wastes and waste oil at the
site. EPA discovered polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), trichloroethylene (TCE), and vinyl
chloride when it sampled the site in 1982. A shallow ditch intercepts surface water that runs off
from the southern part of the site. The ditch empties into culverts that drain into two beaver
ponds at the northern end of Herrick Hollow Creek. This creek contributes water to the
Cannonsville Reservoir. Approximately 100 people live within 1 mile of the site. Three seasonal
homes are located directly downslope from the site, and five other seasonal homes are located
downstream from the site. The shallow groundwater supplying three of the homes is contaminat-
ed with organic compounds. These wells were sealed off, and the residents are using bottled
water provided by a potentially responsible party. In addition, approximately 1,000 people who
depend on surface water or groundwater for their drinking water supply live within 3 miles of the
site.
o-* o -u-r* TU- v • u • AA A *, u NPL LISTING HISTORY
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through
Federal and potentially responsible
party actions.
Proposed Date: 06/10/86
Final Date: 07/22/87
Threats and Contaminants
Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and PCBs have contaminated the soil. Groundwa-
ter at the site contains oily wastes and VOCs, including dichloroethene and TCE.
PCBs and solvents have been found in the surface water and sediments throughout the
beaver ponds in Herrick Hollow Creek. In 1991, a potentially responsible party fenced
the waste oil pit and posted warning signs along the perimeter of the landfill. People
could, however, come into contact with contaminants from the area's drainage system,
the two beaver ponds near the site, and other creeks that surround it. Also, fish in
local streams and animals that depend on area surface water resources could be
contaminated. People or animals coming in contact with or ingesting soil, groundwa-
ter, or surface water are at risk.
November 1994
-------
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in two stages: immediate actions and a long-term remedial phase
directed at cleaning up the entire site.
Response Action Status
Immediate Actions: A potentially responsible party is providing bottled water to
residents in the area who cannot use their water supply due to contamination from the
site. Additionally, the potentially responsible party put a temporary cap on the waste
oil pond to keep contaminants from migrating from the site, and will partially excavate the waste
oil pit to prevent leachate from seeping into the adjacent pond.
Entire Site: The potentially responsible party began a study of the nature and extent
of contamination at the site in 1987. Upon completion of this study, EPA will select a
remedy for the site.
Site Facts: The potentially responsible party signed a Consent Order with EPA in 1987 in
which it agreed to complete an investigation determining the nature and extent of site contamina-
tion and to evaluate cleanup alternatives. Additionally, under a 1993 Consent Order, the
potentially responsible party agreed to excavate the waste oil pit and install a leachate collection
system to prevent leachate from seeping into the adjacent pond.
Environmental Progress
By providing bottled water to the residents affected by contaminated groundwater, the potential
for exposure to hazardous materials has been reduced while the investigations leading to the
selection of a final cleanup remedy are taking place.
November 1994 2 RICHARDSON HILL ROAD LANDFILL/POND
-------
ROBINTECH,
NATIONAL PI
COMPANY
NEW YORK
EPA ID# NYD002232957
Site Description
EPA REGION 2
Broome County
Town of Vestal
The Robintech, Inc./National Pipe Company site is an active manufacturing facility approximately
12 acres in size. The site was owned by Robinson Technical Products from 1966 to 1970;
Robintech, Inc. from 1970 to 1982; and the Buffton Corporation from 1982 to the present. The
facility manufactures polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipe from inert PVC resin and assembles
plastic-coated cable. A sample collected in 1984 to verify compliance with the wastewater
discharge permit, found certain organic chemicals above standards that were not covered under
the existing permit. Further investigation resulted in the conclusion that the source of
contamination was the groundwater, pumped from beneath the site and used in the pipe
production cooling system. Additional investigations showed high levels of lead in soils and
sediments, though data collected before and since these findings have failed to confirm such
contamination. An adjacent recreational facility, Skate Estate, received surface drainage from the
Robintech Site in the past. Three municipal wells, serving the Vestal public water supply, are
located about lh. mile from the site. An estimated 27,000 people reside within 3 miles of the site.
The groundwater in the area is used for municipal well water, with approximately 7,300 people
dependent on the wells.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal and potentially responsible
parties' actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 10/15/84
Final Date: 06/10/86
Threats and Contaminants
The groundwater is contaminated with volatile organic compounds (VOCs) including
1,1,1-trichloroethane, trichloroethylene, and toluene. Potential harmful health effects
include drinking and direct contact with contaminated water. Surface water runoff
leaving the site may have overflowed onto Skate Estate in the past. Soils and
sediments were suspected of being contaminated with lead; however, investigations
did not reveal any potential health threats.
November 1994
-------
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in two long-term remedial phases focusing on cleanup of groundwater
and soil/sediments.
Response Action Status
Groundwater: An investigation into the nature and extent of contamination was
completed in 1991. The EPA selected air stripping as the most appropriate remedy
for cleanup of site groundwater. The design of the selected remedy is underway and
expected to be completed in mid-1995.
Soil/Sediments An investigation into soil and sediment contamination did not
reveal any potential health threats. In early 1993, a "no action" remedy was
selected by EPA for the soil and sediments at the site.
Site Facts: In October 1987, the EPA signed an order with the parties potentially responsible
for site contamination to investigate the extent and nature of contamination and to identify
alternatives for cleanup. A Unilateral Administrative Order was issued for the responsible parties
to design and implement the selected remedy in September 1992.
Environmental Progress
After listing the Robintech Site on the NPL, the EPA conducted a preliminary evaluation of the
conditions at the site and determined that no immediate actions were required to make the site
safer while cleanup actions were being planned.
November 1994 2 ROBINTECH INC./ NATIONAL PIPE COMPANY
-------
ROSEN BROTHERS
SCRAP YARD/DU
NEW YORK
EPA ID# NYD98227273
EPA REGION 2
Cortland County
City of Cortland
Other Names:
Rosen Brothers
Scrap King, Inc.
Site Description
The Rosen Brothers Scrap Yard/Dump site covers 20 acres adjacent to a residential/commercial
area in Cortland. The site is an abandoned industrial facility formerly owned by Wickwire
Brothers, Inc., who manufactured wire screens, nails, and assorted wire products and allegedly
disposed of industrial waste on the site. The entire facility burned to the ground in 1970. From
1971 to 1985, the site was operated as a scrap yard, car crushing, and scrap metal processing
facility by Philip and Harvey Rosen. Municipal waste, industrial waste, construction waste,
timbers, and drums were disposed of in an unlined open dump approximately 100 feet long, 50
feet wide, and 15 to 20 feet deep. Drums, their contents unknown, were routinely crushed on site
and recycled, the contents spilling onto the ground surface. The site was used to stage large
quantities of abandoned vehicles, appliances, steel tanks, drums, fuel truck tanks, and other scrap
materials. An open pit containing water with an oily surface and a large underground storage
tank were abandoned on site, vestiges of the past industrial operations. In 1972, 1984, and 1985,
the Cortland County Health Department cited the Rosen brothers for violating State and County
laws concerning waste handling. In 1985, Philip Rosen was ordered to take needed safety and
cleanup measures, but the order was disregarded. Also in 1985, the New York State Department
of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) found that a building and a 150-foot smoke stack
were structurally unsound. The site overlies the Cortland-Homer-Preble Aquifer, a glacial
outwash sand and gravel deposit. Public and private wells tapping the aquifer within 3 miles of
the site are the sole source of drinking water for an estimated 24,000 people. The population
within a 1-mile radius of the site is approximately 15,000. Perplexity Creek, a seasonally
intermittent stream, borders the site and discharges about 2 miles downstream to the Tioughnioga
River, which is used for recreational activities. The southern border of the site abuts Cortland
City High School, and the site was used as a natural travel route for students walking to school.
The site was secured with a fence in 1989.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal, State, and potentially
responsible parties' actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 06/24/88
Final Date: 03/31/89
November 1994
-------
Threats and Contaminants
In 1986, NYSDEC detected volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in on-site wells and
soil samples. Site-related sediments contain metals. The installation of a fence around
the site, with a weekly maintenance inspection, has eliminated the possibility of
individuals, except for those doing the cleanup work, from making contact with
on-site wastes.
Cleanup Approach
The site cleanup is being addressed in two stages: immediate actions and a long-term remedial
phase focusing on cleanup of the entire site.
Response Action Status
Immediate Actions: In 1987, EPA secured and staged approximately 400 drums,
some leaking, and excavated and staged visibly stained soils. In 1989, the potentially
responsible parties, under monitoring by the EPA, removed all surficial hazardous
wastes, including the staged drums and stained soils, from the site. Also in 1989, the site was
fenced to prevent potential exposure to contamination.
Entire Site: Under EPA monitoring, the parties potentially responsible for the
contamination began an investigation in 1990 to determine the type and extent of
contamination remaining on site and to identify cleanup remedies. The first phase of
the investigation was completed in February 1992. A second phase of sampling was completed in
December 1993. A report based on the results of this data, detailing all potential remedial
alternatives for the site, is anticipated in 1995. From the alternatives presented in the report, EPA
will select the most appropriate site remedy.
Site Facts: In September 1988, the EPA issued an order requiring Dallas Corp., Keystone
Consolidated Industries, Inc., and Monarch Machine Tool Co. to secure the site and to transport
hazardous wastes to an EPA-approved facility. In lanuary 1990, the EPA signed an
Administrative Order on Consent with Dallas Corp., Monarch Machine Tool Company, and
Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. to perform an investigation into the nature and extent of
contamination at the site. In February 1990, the EPA issued a Unilateral Order requiring Cooper
Industries, Inc., Keystone Consolidated Industries, Inc., Potter Paint Company, Inc., Harvey M.
Rosen, and Smith Corona Corp. to participate in the investigation.
November 1994 2 ROSEN BROTHERS SCRAP YARD/DUMP
-------
Environmental Progress
By fencing the site and removing many of the hazardous materials visible on the surface of the
site, the EPA has reduced the potential for exposure to contaminants at the Rosen Brothers Scrap
Yard/Dump. Investigations that will be used to make informed cleanup decisions for the
remaining contamination at the site are underway.
ROSEN BROTHERS SCRAP YARD/DUMP
November 1994
-------
ROWE
GROUND
CONTAMINATION
\/f\Ol/ f Contamination Site
EPA ID# NYD981 486954
Site Description
The Rowe Industries Ground Water Contamination site is located on the eastern side of the Sag
Harbor Bridgehampton Turnpike and consists of approximately 5 acres. From the 1950s through
the early 1960s, the site was owned and operated by Rowe Industries, Inc. During that time, the
company manufactured small electric motors and transformers. Rowe Industries was purchased
by Aurora Plastics, Inc. in the late 1960s and by Nabisco, Inc. in the early 1970s. In 1980, the
site was sold to Sag Harbor Industries, which uses the facility to manufacture electronic devices.
Reports from former workers indicated that spent solvents were discharged through drains
leading from the building into cesspools, directly onto the land surface, or to a small pond farther
east. Ground water contamination first was discovered in the Sag Harbor area in 1983. The
Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS) stated that water samples taken from a
private well revealed contamination by solvents and iron. As a result of these findings, the
SCDHS and the EPA conducted further investigations. The results of monitoring studies of 46
private wells and 21 observation wells in 1984 indicated that the contaminated ground water
plume was approximately 500 feet wide, flowed northeast of the site, and contained chlorinated
hydrocarbons. Approximately 6,000 people within a 3-mile radius of the site use ground water as
their primary source of drinking water.
_. _ ..... „,...,. ,, , , , ISIPL LISTING HISTORY
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through Proposed Date- 06/10/86
Final Date: 07/22/87
Federal and potentially responsible
parties' actions.
Threats and Contaminants
Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) including tetrachloroethene and trichloroethene
were detected in on-site monitoring wells. Health threats may exist from the migration
of contaminants via the ground water or chemical vapors in the air. Potential contact
with contaminated ground water through drinking well water is no longer a concern,
because a public water supply was installed for all homes in the area in 1985.
November 1994
-------
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in two stages: immediate actions and a long-term remedial phase
focusing on cleanup of the entire site.
Response Action Status
Immediate Actions: In response to the contaminated drinking water, the EPA
extended the public water supply mains to the 25 affected homes in 1985.
Entire Site: Under EPA oversight, Nabisco Inc. and Sag Harbor Industries Inc.
performed an investigation to determine the type and extent of contamination at the
site and to identify alternatives for cleanup. The EPA reviewed the results of these
studies and selected the final cleanup remedy in the fall of 1992. The remedy entails excavating
the soil and pumping and treating the ground water plume. The design of the remedy is
underway and is scheduled to be completed in 1995.
Site Facts: Nabisco, Inc. and Sag Harbor Industries, Inc. signed a Consent Decree with EPA
agreeing to implement the selected remedy for the site. The Notice of Lodging of the Consent
Decree was published in the Federal Register on December 28, 1993. During the thirty day
public comment period which followed, there was only one comment letter received from the
Town Trustee. EPA has addressed their concern and does not anticipate any revision to the
Consent Decree.
Environmental Progress
By providing a safe drinking water supply to those residences affected by contaminated ground
water, the EPA reduced the potential of exposure to contaminants in the well water, while final
cleanup actions are being planned.
November 1 994 2 ROWE INDUSTRIES
GROUND WATER CONTAMINATION
-------
SARNEY FARM ^ EPA REG'ON 2
/ ^^-^___ F]x^n—I—J Dutchess County
NEW YORK ( O>) Amenia
EPA ID# NYD980535165
Site Description
The Sarney Farm site, located in a farming area in Amenia, New York, is a landfill which
received non-permitted disposal of hazardous wastes from 1965 until 1969. A former owner of
the property was permitted to use a 5-acre section of the property as a landfill for municipal
wastes, but industrial and municipal wastes were also disposed of at locations throughout the site.
Groundwater contamination was confirmed by the Dutchess County Department of Health in
1982 and by New York State in 1984. The site is adjacent to Cleaver Swamp, which has
provided water for farm livestock in the past. Several small villages are located nearby. There
are 22 residential wells utilizing the bedrock aquifer within 3,000 feet of the site. There are no
public water supplies located within the area. Approximately 3,000 people live within 1 mile of
the site; 10,000 live within 3 miles of the site.
o-* D -UM-* TU- v • u • AA A ^ u NPL LISTING HISTORY
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through Proposed Date- 10/15/84
Federal and State actions. Final Date. 06/10/86
Threats and Contaminants
Groundwater is contaminated with volatile organic compounds (VOCs) including
toluene, dichloroethane, and vinyl chloride. Leachate analysis has identified VOCs
including acetone, toluene, and xylenes. Potential contaminant migration is limited to
Cleaver Swamp, which receives surface water runoff from the disposal areas and is
the local ground water discharge area. The major health concern is the use of
contaminated groundwater for domestic uses. There has been a decrease in agricultural
use of the area; therefore, exposure to contaminants through the consumption of
livestock and agricultural products is unlikely.
November 1994
-------
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in two stages: immediate actions and a long-term remedial phase
focusing on cleanup of the entire site.
Response Action Status
Immediate Actions: In an effort to reduce the levels of organic pollutants and to
reduce the potential for migration of contaminants to Cleaver Swamp, the EPA
developed a biodegradation/aeration treatment system in 1987. The system treated
leachate and wastes from the original dump site and migratory areas.
Entire Site: The EPA selected a remedy for the site in 1990 which includes
excavation and off-site disposal of drums, low-temperature thermal treatment of
contaminated soils, and a confirmatory hydrogeological investigation. The
hydrogeologic study has been completed, and no contamination has been detected in off-site
drinking water wells. The remaining cleanup activities at the site have been separated into two
phases to expedite the removal of hazardous waste-containing drums that are buried on site. The
first phase has been initiated. Over 800 55-gallon drums and 5-gallon pails, and over 1,300 glass
lab-pack bottles have been excavated. Drums excavated from one area are being shipped for off-
site disposal. The second phase, soil treatment, is presently being designed. This design work
should be completed in 1995, followed by initiation of actual soil cleanup.
Environmental Progress
A treatment system for the contaminated leachate and wastes from the Sarney Farm site currently
is operative, greatly reducing the migration of and the threat of exposure to contaminants at the
site while final cleanup activities are being designed.
November 1994 2 SARNEY FARM
-------
SEALAND
RESTORATION
NEW YORK
EPA ID# NYD9805351
EPA REGION 2
St. Lawrence County
Lisbon
Site Description
The Sealand Restoration, Inc. site, located in the Village of Lisbon, covers 210 acres. The site,
formerly a dairy farm, was acquired by Sealand Restoration, Inc. in 1977 and was operated as a
waste disposal facility. Petroleum wastes were landfilled in a disposal cell near the southern site
boundary or spread on the ground surface in the central and northern parts of the site. Three
areas are being addressed: a landspread area; an empty drum storage area; and a disposal cell
located 100 yards from a wetland. Approximately 1,000 people reside within 3 miles of the site.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal, State, local, and potentially
responsible parties' actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 10/26/89
Final Date: 08/30/90
Threats and Contaminants
IA
Groundwater is contaminated with heavy metals and volatile organic compounds
(VOCs), including benzene, trichloroethene, 1,1,1-trichloroethane, toluene, and
acetone. Surface water was found to be contaminated with aluminum, iron, lead,
manganese, and zinc. Low levels of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), pesticides,
phenols, and heavy metals were found in soils in the landspread area. Potential health
risks exist to those who come into direct contact with the contaminants, accidentally
ingest contaminated vegetation, or drink contaminated groundwater.
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in three phases: immediate actions; an interim source control action;
and a long-term remedial phase directed at cleanup of the entire site.
November 1 994
-------
Response Action Status
Immediate Actions: After samples collected in 1993 from residential wells located
near the site were found to contain contaminants from the site, bottled water has been
provided to nine residents by the potentially responsible parties.
Interim Source Control: Aboveground wastes were removed from the cell disposal
area in 1984 and from the empty drum storage area in 1986 and 1987 by the county,
using State funds. From 1989 to 1990, the New York State Department of Environ-
mental Conservation removed contaminated soils, buried drums, and wastewater from the cell
disposal area.
Entire Site: An investigation to determine the nature and extent of on-site groundwa-
ter, surface water, sediment, and remaining soil contamination, and to evaluate
cleanup alternatives is presently underway. Upon completion of the investigation,
EPA will select appropriate cleanup remedies.
Site Facts: EPA issued an Administrative Order in August 1993 to the potentially responsible
parties requiring them to provide bottled water to the residences with wells which may be
impacted by contaminants migrating from the site.
Environmental Progress
By removing the drums and contaminated soils from the Sealand Restoration site, fencing the cell
disposal area, and providing bottled water to residents with impacted wells, the possibility of
being directly exposed to hazardous materials at the site has been reduced while additional
cleanup activities are planned.
November 1994 2 SEALAND RESTORATION, INC.
-------
SENECA ARMY DER
NEW YORK
EPA ID# NY021382083
EPA REGION 2
Seneca County
Near the Town of Romulus
Site Description
The Seneca Army Depot site encompasses 10,587 acres between Cayuga and Seneca Lakes in the
Finger Lakes region, abutting the Town of Romulus. The Army has stored and disposed of
military explosives at the facility since 1941. There is an unlined 4-acre landfill in the western
portion of the depot, where incinerator ash was disposed of intermittently from 1941 until 1979.
The site also has two incinerator pits adjacent to the landfill, where refuse was burned at least
once a week from 1941 to 1974, and a 90-acre area in the northwestern portion of the depot,
where explosives have been detonated since 1941 and related wastes were burned on fractured
shale pads until 1987. There also is an APE-1236 Deactivation Furnace at the depot, where small
arms are destroyed. Seneca Army Depot has downsized significantly and is considered to be a
potential candidate for base closure in 1995. Depot activities are now under the command and
control of Toby Hanna Army Depot in Pennsylvania. Approximately 1,000 people obtain
drinking water from private wells within a 3 mile radius of the depot.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 07/14/89
Final Date: 08/30/90
Threats and Contaminants
The ground water is contaminated with volatile organic compounds (VOCs) including
trichloroethylene (TCE), vinyl chloride, and chloroform. Soils are contaminated with
heavy metals and VOCs. People who accidentally ingest or come into direct contact
with contaminated groundwater or soil may suffer adverse health effects.
December 1994
-------
Cleanup Approach
The site is currently being addressed in two long-term remedial phases focusing on cleanup of the
ash landfill and the open burning areas. Additional areas of concern are expected to be added to
the investigation in the future.
Response Action Status
Ash Landfill: The Army is conducting an investigation to determine the nature and
extent of contamination in the ash landfill area. Soil arid groundwater sampling have
been completed. The final report is scheduled for completion in early 1995, at which
time EPA will select a final cleanup remedy.
Open Burning Grounds: The Army is conducting an investigation to determine the
extent of contamination in the open burning grounds. Soil and groundwater sampling
have been completed. The final report is scheduled for completion in early 1995, at
which time EPA will select a final cleanup remedy.
Site Facts: The Seneca Army Depot is participating in the Installation Restoration Program, a
specially funded program established by the Department of Defense (DOD) in 1978 to identify,
investigate, and control the migration of hazardous contaminants at military and other DOD
facilities. A Federal Facility Agreement was signed by the Army, the New York State
Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) and EPA as of January 21, 1993.
Environmental Progress
After adding the Seneca Army Depot site to the NPL, it was determined, after an initial
evaluation, that the site did not require immediate removal actions to make it safer to the
surrounding communities or the environment while investigations leading to the selection of final
cleanup remedies are underway.
December 1994 2 SENECA ARMY DEPOT
-------
SIDNEY LANDFILL^^^ E™ REG'ON 2
x-v$ ^-< \ JM Delaware County
NEW YORK r ?rrt4 sidnev
EPA ID# NYD980507677
Site Description
The Sidney Landfill site covers 50 acres of a hilltop located on the eastern side of Richardson
Hill Road, approximately 1 mile from Route 27 in the Town of Sidney. The landfill, located in a
sparsely populated area of steep hills, woods, and farmland, accepted municipal and commercial
waste, and possibly, waste oils from 1964 until 1972. Waste streams from the landfill may have
contained organic solvents and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). Groundwater and surface water
in the area could become contaminated, because the landfill is located on a hilltop and slope,
where water can flow in different directions at the same time. A wetland area and Herrick
Hollow Creek are located immediately downslope from the site. A private well at the base of the
hill was closed because of a high iron content, possibly attributable to the landfill. Organic
solvents are present in the bedrock and soil off-site. This poses a threat to local springs that feed
into nearby drainages. The site is covered, but is not properly capped; leachate seeps have been
associated with this landfill since the 1960s. Approximately 1,700 people obtain drinking water
from private wells within 3 miles of the site.
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through
Federal actions. Final Date: 03/31/89
Threats and Contaminants
The groundwater on- and off-site contains volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and
PCBs. The leachate, sediments, and surface water on-site contain VOCs. Solvents and
PCBs are present in on-site soils. The site is not completely fenced, which makes it
possible for people and animals to come into direct contact with contaminated soil and
with contaminated groundwater at leachate seeps and drainage ditches along Richard-
son Hill Road.
November 1994
-------
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in two stages: immediate actions and a long-term remedial phase
focusing on cleanup of the entire site.
Response Action Status
Immediate Actions: Approximately 80 warning signs have been posted along the
perimeter of the landfill.
Entire Site: In 1990, the EPA began an investigation of this site to determine the
nature and extent of contamination and to evaluate cleanup alternatives. The EPA
plans to complete the investigation in 1995, at which time it will select the final
remedy for cleaning up the site.
Site Facts: The EPA sent 53 information request letters and followed up with 15 letters
notifying potentially responsible parties of their liability and requesting them to initiate cleanup
actions.
Environmental Progress
The EPA's preliminary evaluations determined that the posting of warning signs made the Sidney
Landfill site safer while the investigations leading to the selection of a final remedy are taking
place.
November 1994 2 SIDNEY LANDFILL
-------
SINCLAIR REFINERY
NEW YORK
EPA ID# NYD980535215
EPA REGION 2
Allegany County
Wellsville
Site Description
The Sinclair Refinery site covers approximately 100 acres adjacent to the west bank of the
Genesee River, one-quarter mile south of downtown Wellsville. The refinery was built in the
late 1800's and operated by the Wellsville Refining Company until 1919. The Sinclair Refining
Company, now called the Atlantic Richfield Company (ARCO), purchased the property and
operated the refinery until a fire ended operations in 1958. After closure of the refinery, a
majority of the property was transferred to the Village of Wellsville, which subsequently
conveyed land parcels to various entities, including the State University of New York and the
various companies now occupying the site. Wastes, including cloth filters, oil sludges,
contaminated soil, pesticides, heavy metals, and fly ash, were disposed of in two on-site landfills
over a 30-year period. The landfill area consisted of a 9-acre Central Elevated Landfill Area, a
2-acre South Landfill Area, and a 1-acre sand and gravel area between the two landfills. The
landfill area of the site is located at the extreme southern end of the site, along the west bank of
the Genesee River, approximately 1 1/4 miles upstream from the Village of Wellsville's former
water supply intake pipe. The EPA, the State, and ARCO relocated the town's river water intake
to a point upstream of the landfill in 1985, so that any contaminants entering the river through
erosion of the landfill would no longer threaten the water supply. Before any steps to cleanup
the site were initiated, the river was slowly eroding the ground under the landfill, creating the
potential for contamination of off-site surface waters if the river's flood waters were high enough
to reach the landfill. Approximately 6,000 people live within a mile of the landfill. Several
businesses and the State University of New York at Alfred's Wellsville Campus are located on
the refinery portion of the Sinclair property. Approximately 500 people use the buildings located
on this part of the site.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal, State, municipal, and
potentially responsible parties' actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 07/23/82
Final Date: 09/08/83
November 1994
-------
Threats and Contaminants
Groundwater and soils contain volatile organic compounds (VOCs), semi-volatile
organic compounds, and heavy metals. Potential human exposure from drinking water
has been eliminated as a result of the relocation of the Wellsville Water Treatment
Plant intake pipe. Ingestion of contaminated groundwater at the site and prolonged
exposure to contaminated dust from isolated "hot spots" on site could present a risk.
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in three stages: immediate actions and two long-term remedial phases
focusing on stabilization of the landfill and source control in the refinery area of the site.
Response Action Status
Immediate Actions: In 1983, ARCO removed approximately 10 loose drums from
the Genesee River. In 1983, the State of New York diverted the Genesee River
away from the eroding face of the landfill and placed dredged material there as
temporary protection against erosion. Later in 1983, the Village of Wellsville, Allegany County,
and the State of New York stabilized the berm constructed to divert the Genesee River to protect
the eroding landfill. In 1985, the Town's river water intake was relocated upstream from the
landfill. Two removal actions were completed at the site in 1993, including the demolition and
removal of asbestos-containing powerhouse building, a 245-foot concrete and brick smokestack
associated with former refinery operations, and the excavation and removal of two underground
storage tanks.
Stabilization of the Landfill: The EPA selected the following remedies to stabilize
the eroding landfill: removal of approximately 300 drums from the landfill and
disposal of them off-site; excavation of wastes from the 2-acre South Landfill Area;
placement of clean fill in the excavated area; consolidation of excavated wastes into the Central
Elevated Landfill Area; capping of consolidated wastes in the Central Elevated Landfill Area;
partial channelization of the Genesee River to protect the landfill from erosion or flooding; and
construction of a fence around the entire landfill to secure it. River channelization and landfill
consolidation activities were completed in 1991. Construction of the landfill cap, including
construction of a security fence, was completed in early 1994.
Source Control/Refinery Site: The EPA selected the following remedies to
address the refinery portion of the site in 1991: excavating and consolidating surface
soil "hot spots" into the Central Elevated Landfill Area; pumping contaminated
groundwater and treating it to health-based levels before discharge; and monitoring site media,
including the groundwater and surface water, for any possible contaminant migration. ARCO
agreed to implement the groundwater remedy under an order signed by the EPA hi late 1992.
The design to address the contaminated groundwater at the site was initiated in 1993 and is
scheduled for completion in 1994. The excavation and consolidation of surface soils commenced
in 1992 and was completed in 1993.
November 1994 2 SINCLAIR REFINERY
-------
Site Facts: An agreement was signed between the Village of Wellsville, the State of New York,
and ARCO, which detailed how ARCO would finance the plan to stabilize the diversion berm
constructed by the State in 1983. The EPA sent a Letter of Acceptance to ARCO in April 1988,
accepting their proposed work on the Genesee River. The EPA accepted ARCO's plan for the
landfill consolidation and the consolidated landfill cap in 1990 and 1991, respectively.
Environmental Progress
The removal of many sources of contamination, actions taken to ensure a safe drinking water
supply, stabilization of the landfill, and the removal of contaminated surface soils have made the
site safer while additional cleanup activities are planned.
SINCLAIR REFINERY
November 1994
-------
SMS
INC.
NEW YORK
EPA ID# NYD001533165
Site Description
SMS Instruments, Inc. is located in a light industrial area in Deer Park. The site consists of a
one-story 34,000-square-foot masonry building on 1 1/2 acres. Approximately 80% of the lot is
paved with asphalt. From 1971 to 1983, SMS Instruments, Inc. overhauled military aircraft
components. Industrial wastes generated from degreasing and other refurbishing operations
routinely were discharged to a leaching pool on site. Another source of waste disposal was a
6,000-gallon underground storage tank used for jet fuel storage. Between 1979 and 1980, the
Suffolk County Department of Health detected solvents in the pool and installed monitoring
wells. Investigations at the site during 1981 revealed 70 drums stored outdoors in an unprotected
area, some showing evidence of corrosion and leakage. More than 50 industrial facilities are
located within a 1-mile radius of the site, and a large groundwater recharge basin is located
adjacent to the eastern side of the site. The basin is located in the recharge zone of the Magothy
aquifer, a sole source aquifer for Long Island. The Magothy aquifer is the only source of
drinking water for the estimated 124,000 residents in the vicinity of the site. Approximately
17,000 residences are located within a mile of the site. Several schools are situated to the south
of the site. The headwaters of Sampawams Creek, which feeds into Guggenheim Lakes, lie one
mile southeast of the site. Belmont Lake State Park is less than 2 miles to the southwest.
e-* r> -UT* TU- v • u • AA A^ v, NPL LISTING HISTORY
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through
Federal actions.
Proposed Date: 10/15/84
Final Date: 06/10/86
Threats and Contaminants
IV
Industrial waste from the metal degreasing and refurbishing operations caused
groundwater contamination with volatile organic compounds (VOCs) including xylene,
toluene, and benzene. The on-site leaching pools were contaminated with heavy metals
including chromium, zinc, lead, and cadmium. Soil is contaminated with chlorinated
solvents. Potential health risks may exist for individuals coming into contact with, or
ingesting groundwater or soil. Inhaling vapors from contaminated groundwater also
may pose a risk. The Suffolk County Department of Health Services has indicated that
residents in the vicinity of the site may maintain private wells for irrigation purposes,
but not as a source of drinking water.
December 1994
-------
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in three stages: an immediate action and two long-term remedial
phases focusing on cleanup of the entire site and off-site groundwater contamination.
Response Action Status
Immediate Actions: The leaching pool was pumped out, filled with sand, and
sealed in 1983. The underground jet fuel storage tank was removed in 1988.
Entire Site: In the fall of 1989, EPA selected a remedy for the groundwater and
soils at the site. The remedy calls for extracting and treating groundwater at the site
by air stripping and reinjecting it back into the ground and treating on-site soils by in-
place vacuum extraction to remove volatile organic contaminants. The construction of the soil
vapor extraction unit began full operation in the spring of 1992; by late 1993, all soil cleanup
was complete. The construction of the groundwater treatment plant was completed in mid-1994.
It is currently operational, and is expected to continue its operations for approximately four
years, or until groundwater cleanup standards are met.
Off-Site Contamination: In May 1992, EPA completed an investigation to
determine the type and extent of groundwater contamination upgradient of the site.
The study indicated that there were no off-site sources which affected the
contamination at the site. A "No Action" remedy for off-site groundwater contamination was
selected in 1993.
Environmental Progress
The immediate actions and the successful clean-up of the soils by soil-vapor extraction, have
greatly reduced the spread of on-site contamination.
December 1994
SMS INSTRUMENTS, INC.
-------
SOLVENT
SAVERS
NEW YORK
EPA ID# NYD980421176
EPA REGION 2
Chenango County
Lincklaen
Site Description
The Solvent Savers site covers 13 acres in the Town of Lincklaen. Industrial solvents and other
wastes were brought to Solvent Savers Inc., a chemical waste recovery facility, for reprocessing
or disposal from about 1967 to 1974. Operations included distillation to recover solvents for
reuse, drum reconditioning, and burial of liquids, solids, sludges, and drums in several on-site
areas. The quantities and types of wastes disposed of at the site and their locations are not fully
known. Two residences are located within 300 feet of the site. Public water supplies do not exist
in the general area; therefore, the residents rely on private wells. The Town of Lincklaen has a
population of approximately 500 people. Fifteen dairy farms are located in the Town. Pastures
for dairy cows are located 2 miles from the site along a portion of Mud Creek, which is
downstream of the site. Mud Creek is classified as a trout stream by the State and is used for
recreational activities and livestock watering. In addition, alfalfa, corn, and other crops for
human and livestock consumption are grown in the area.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal and potentially responsible par-
ties' actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 12/01/82
Final Date: 09/08/83
Threats and Contaminants
The groundwater, surface water, sediment, and soil are contaminated with volatile
organic compounds (VOCs) which primarily include tetrachloroethene, trichloroethyl-
ene, and 1,1,1-trichloroethane. The soil and groundwater contain inorganic chemicals,
including arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, and lead. The soil is also contaminat-
ed with polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). People who touch or accidentally ingest
contaminated groundwater, surface water, soil, or sediments may be at risk. Cows
grazing in nearby pastures may be harmed if contaminants migrate to the fields.
Wildlife in and around Mud Creek may be exposed to pollutants seeping from the site
into the water.
November 1994
-------
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in two stages: immediate actions and a long-term remedial phase
focusing on cleanup of the entire site.
Response Action Status
Immediate Actions: In early 1989, during an EPA site investigation, 127 drums
were excavated and overpacked with leakproof outer drums. In late 1990, the
potentially responsible parties removed the overpacked drums for off-site treatment
and disposal at an EPA-approved facility. In the fall of 1991, the potentially responsible parties
excavated 33 drums and drum parts, which were sent for off-site treatment and disposal.
Approximately 200 cubic yards of contaminated soil also were removed during the excavation of
the drums and drum parts. The potentially responsible parties are scheduled to remove the
contaminated soil for off-site treatment and disposal in 1994.
Entire Site: In 1990, following the completion of an investigation to determine the
nature and extent of the contamination at and emanating from the site, a remedy was
selected for the site. The selected remedy calls for: chemical precipitation, air
stripping, and carbon adsorption to cleanup the contaminated groundwater; excavation of the
contaminated soil; treatment of PCB-contaminated soil either by on-site low temperature thermal
extraction or off-site incineration; treatment of the soil contaminated with high levels of VOCs
via low temperature thermal extraction; and treatment of the soil contaminated with low levels of
VOCs by on-site soil flushing, vapor extraction, or low temperature thermal extraction. Design
activities for the remedy began in mid-1991, and are expected to be completed in 1995.
Site Facts: In September 1989, EPA issued an Administrative Order to the potentially
responsible parties, directing them to carry out the immediate actions at the site described above.
In May 1991, EPA issued a second administrative order to the potentially responsible parties,
requiring them to undertake design and cleanup activities in accordance with the remedy selected
for the site.
Environmental Progress
Excavation, treatment, and disposal of the drums discovered at the site has reduced the threats
associated with further migration of hazardous materials and contamination of the soil and
groundwater while the design of final cleanup remedies is ongoing.
November 1994 2 SOLVENT SAVERS
-------
SUFFERN VILLAGE ^^ EP* *ErtG'ON 2
.*V/—V T~? Rockland County
WELL FIELD
NEW YORK
EPA ID# NYD98078087
Site Description
The Suffern Village Well Field site covers 30 acres in the Village of Suffern. The Village
operates four production wells that provide water to approximately 12,000 people at a rate of
almost 2 million gallons per day. In 1978, the State detected trichloroethane, a volatile organic
compound (VOC), in the municipal water distribution system. Currently, wells 1, 2, and 4 are
shut down due to the contamination. The Tempcon Corporation, a small oil burner reconditioning
business, was identified as the source of the contamination. The company is located 2,500 feet
uphill of the well field. Until 1979, the company used a seepage disposal pit and
trichloroethane-based solvents. During investigations, coal gasification wastes were found at the
Econo-Body Truck and Equipment Corporation, located approximately 400 feet away from the
well field. Approximately 10,800 people live in the Village of Suffern. All of the residents in the
area use municipally treated water. The well field is adjacent to the Ramapo River.
-_ _ ...... _. . . , , .. , , . NPL LISTING HISTORY
Site Responsibility: This site has been addressed through Proposed Date- 10/15/84
Federal and State actions. Final Date. 06/10/86
Deletion Date: 05/28/93
Threats and Contaminants
Groundwater was contaminated with VOCs, primarily trichloroethane, and lesser
amounts of dichloroethane and naphthalene. Soils also were contaminated with VOCs.
The investigation and risk assessment indicated that following the immediate actions
performed at the site, the remaining threats were not significant enough to warrant
further cleanup actions.
November 1994
-------
Cleanup Approach
Response Action Summary
Immediate Actions: In 1979, the contaminated soil located at the Tempcon facility
was excavated, aerated, and then backfilled. In 1979, the Village installed a system
to remove pollutants in the municipal water supply by exposing the water to air to
evaporate contaminants. This system was operated intermittently as needed, and currently is not
in service.
Entire Site: The State completed an investigation of the site contamination in 1987.
Based on the study results, the EPA decided with State concurrence that, due to the
presence of only moderate levels of contaminants and predicted low levels in the
future, no further cleanup actions were warranted. However, the State monitored the site to
confirm the validity of this decision. As a result of the first year monitoring program, the EPA
decided that the site could be deleted from the NPL. The site was deleted from the NPL on May
28, 1993.
Site Facts: As a result of new State drinking water quality standards, the Village installed an
activated carbon treatment system at the wellfield in 1990.
Environmental Progress
The cleanup actions at the Suffern Village Well Field site have been completed to both the EPA's
and the State's satisfaction, therefore protecting the public health and the environment. The State
will continue to monitor the site to ensure the long-term effectiveness of the cleanup actions taken
at this site.
November 1994 2 SUFFERN VILLAGE WELL FIELD
-------
QYHQQFT ^-*P EPA REGION 2
O T U O O t I ^]^~\ Nassau Coun'y
LANDFILL 0VTT1 OysterBay
NEW YORK
EPA ID# NYD00051136
Site Description
The Syosset Landfill, in the Town of Oyster Bay, is approximately 35 acres in size. The landfill
is bordered by the Long Island Railroad to the northwest and the Cerro Wire and Cable Company
plant to the southwest. Single family residences and an elementary school are located to the
northeast of the site. Offices and storage yards for the Town of Oyster Bay Sanitation and
Highway Departments occupy the southern end of the site. From 1933 to 1975, the landfill
received mixed municipal refuse, cesspool pump-out wastes, and industrial wastes from such
sources as Cerro Wire and Cable Corp., Columbia Corrugated Container Corp., and the Hooker
Chemical Company located in Hicksville. Investigations revealed high concentrations of heavy
metals in the industrial sludges being deposited, as well as in wastes discharged from scavenger
plant operations. In addition, volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in two private wells and one
Jericho Water District well were substantially above safe drinking water levels. In 1974, the
public water well located 600 feet from the landfill was closed due to taste and odor problems
allegedly resulting from the leachate plume coming from the landfill. Gas migration from the
landfill to the South Grove School, which is located along one side of the site, was documented
on several different occasions in the early 1980s. A permanent ventilation trench subsequently
was constructed along the school landfill border. Approximately 59,000 people depend on
groundwater from public and municipal wells for drinking water in the area. The nearest well is
2,000 feet from the site. There are approximately 1,200 homes, 12 public schools, and one
hospital complex located within '4-mile from the site.
o-* D -u-r* TU- v • K • AA A^ K NPL LISTING HISTORY
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through Proposed Date- 12/30/82
Final Date: 09/08/83
Federal and potentially responsible
parties' actions.
Threats and Contaminants
Groundwater contains low levels of VOCs including vinyl chloride, benzene, toluene,
and xylene; heavy metals including lead, arsenic, chromium, cadmium, manganese,
and iron; and poly chlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). Accidental ingestion and direct
contact with contaminated groundwater are potential health threats for individuals
living near the site. Health threats associated with gas migration from the landfill have
been eliminated.
November 1994
-------
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in three stages: immediate actions and two long-term remedial phases
focusing on cleanup of the on- and off-site contamination.
Response Action Status
Immediate Actions: A permanent ventilation trench has been constructed to reduce
gas migration from the site to the school area. Air analysis performed in 1983
indicated that the gas concentrations in the area north of the ventilation trench were
reduced to non-detectable levels.
On-Site Contamination: The EPA selected a remedy in 1990, which includes
capping the landfill, monitoring and maintaining the gas collection system, installing
an additional gas venting system, monitoring the air and groundwater quality,
maintaining the fence around the perimeter of the landfill, and implementing institutional controls
to restrict future use of the landfill. The design of the remedy began in the fall of 1991. An
additional phase has been added which consists of placing clean fill material on site to enhance
settlement prior to cap construction. The design of the remedy is expected to be completed in
1995, at which time cleanup activities will begin.
Off-Site Contamination: The potentially responsible parties completed an
investigation of the possible migration of contaminants from the landfill in late 1993.
The remedy for final cleanup is expected to be selected in late 1994.
Environmental Progress
Elimination of gas vapor migration from the landfill has reduced the health risks associated with
contaminants in the air. The EPA's preliminary evaluations showed that the Syosset Landfill site
does not pose any immediate threats to the neighboring community or the environment while
investigations leading to the selection of final cleanup remedies are taking place.
November 1994 2 SYOSSET LANDFILL
-------
TRI-CITIES BAWR
CODING.
NEW YORK
EPA ID# NYD9805092
EPA REGION 2
Broome County
Adjacent to Old Route 7 in Fenton
Site Description
Tri-Cities Barrel Co., Inc. is a 3 1/2-acre site in the Town of Fenton where, since 1955, used
drams have been reconditioned. The drums are washed with a strong caustic agent as part of the
reconditioning process. The wastewater from this process was then discharged into unlined
lagoons and allowed to evaporate. In 1980, the company cleaned out and backfilled the lagoons
and now stores the wastewater in a holding tank before it is disposed of off-site. Osborne Creek
crosses the northern part of the site. Local residents use surface water downstream and within 3
miles of the site for recreation. Approximately 3,500 people obtain drinking water from wells
within 3 miles of the site. There is fishing and boating activity about a mile south of the site.
Surface water is used for irrigation at two nearby farms.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal, State, and potentially
responsible parties' actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 05/05/87
Final Date: 10/04/89
Threats and Contaminants
The groundwater contains polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and chlordane, a
pesticide. The soil is contaminated with a variety of organic compounds and heavy
metals. Direct contact with or ingestion of contaminated groundwater or soils may
pose a health threat. The site is unfenced, making it possible for people and animals to
come into direct contact with hazardous substances.
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in a long-term remedial phase focusing on cleanup of the entire site.
November 1994
-------
Response Action Status
Entire Site: In mid-1992, pursuant to a consent order, the potentially responsible
parties initiated an investigation to determine the nature and extent of contamination
at, and emanating from, the site. The study is scheduled to be completed in 1995.
EPA will use the results of this study as the basis for selecting the best method to clean up the
site.
Site Facts: In 1984, EPA fined the Tri-Cities Barrel Co., Inc. for failure to label hazardous
wastes properly. A Consent Order was executed in May 1992 by EPA and the potentially
responsible parties in which the parties agreed to perform the investigation of the site.
Environmental Progress
After adding the Tri-Cities Barrel Co., Inc. site to the National Priorities List, EPA conducted an
initial evaluation and determined that no immediate cleanup actions were necessary while the
investigations leading to the selection of a final cleanup remedy are taking place.
November 1994
TRI-CITY BARREL CO., INC.
-------
TRONIC PLATING^^^JPA REGION 2
CO., INC. r^^^^^T Farmingdale
NEW YORK
EPA ID# NYD002059517
Site Description
The Tronic Plating Co., Inc. site is comprised of lh. acre of a 21/2-acre lot in a relatively flat area
of Farmingdale. Tronic Plating occupied the southeastern corner of a long building in an
industrial park area from 1968 to 1984, where it provided electroplating and metal protective
coating services for the electronics industry. The site consists of the long building, two inside
above ground storage tanks, four underground leaching pools, and a storm drain in the paved
area to the northeast of the building. During its operation, the facility discharged industrial wastes
into a sanitary pit and the four underground leaching pools. The storm drains, which were
located approximately 40 feet from the northern rear door of the operation, allegedly also were
used by Tronic Plating to dispose of potentially hazardous effluent. New York State issued a
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit to Tronic in 1980. Tests
conducted by the New York State Department of Health in 1985 detected heavy metals including
copper, silver, iron, zinc, lead, and cadmium in the leaching pools and in the storm drain. The
company now is operating in another location. The building space where it formerly operated is
occupied by three small companies. About 16,000 people in the area use groundwater as their
sole source of drinking water. The population within a 1-mile radius of the site is estimated to
be about 1,800 people. The closest residences are located approximately 1,000 feet east of the
site. An industrial school is located 3/4 miles northeast of the site.
Site Responsibility: This site was addressed through
Federal and potentially responsible
parties' actions.
Threats and Contaminants
Final Date: 06/10/86
On-site groundwater was suspected to have been contaminated with cyanide and heavy
metals. Surface water located in industrial process and waste streams (storm drains,
sanitary pools, leaching pools, piping to industrial pools, and the cooling water pool)
was contaminated with cyanide and heavy metals including nickel and lead. There was
concern that the dissolved contaminants could migrate through the on-site soils into the
groundwater because of the sandy, highly permeable soil native to Long Island. Area
residents could have been exposed to site-related contaminants by ingesting or
touching the groundwater. Another potential source of exposure to site-related
contaminants was inhalation of contaminants that have become airborne.
November 1994
-------
Cleanup Approach
Response Action Status
Initial Actions: In 1993, the potentially responsible party removed wastes from
storm drains, sanitary leaching pools and dry wells.
Entire Site: In 1992, the party potentially responsible for the site contamination
completed an investigation defining the nature and extent of site contamination.
Based on the results, EPA determined that the site does not pose a significant threat
to human health and the environment. The results of this investigation indicated that there were
contaminated soils and sediments on-site, but at low levels that did not pose a risk to human
health. EPA conducted a risk assessment and determined that the risks from the site were within
EPA's acceptable risk range. Therefore, EPA decided to take no further action in cleaning up
the site.
Site Facts: Commerce Holding Company signed an Administrative Order on Consent which
obligated the company to conduct an investigation of site contamination under EPA supervision.
Once the investigation was completed, Commerce Holding Company signed another
Administrative Order on Consent to remove contaminated soils and sediments from on-site storm
drains, sanitary leaching pools and dry wells.
Environmental Progress
By removing wastes from the on-site drainage areas, the threats at the Tronic Plating Co. have
been addressed and no further action is required.
November 1994 2 TRONIC PLATING CO., INC.
-------
VESTAL WATER ,—, Epf RE«ION 2
. " \ Broome County
SUPPLY WELL 1-1 > S^H Vesta,
NEW YORK
EPA ID# NYD980763767
Site Description
The Vestal Water Supply Well 1-1 is located on the southern bank of the Susquehanna River in
Vestal. An industrial park is located immediately to the southeast of the well, along Stage Road.
Several marshy areas and drainage ditches encompass and interlace the industrial park. The
western portion of the site includes a water district well field, a soccer field, and a fire
department training center. Well 1-1 is one of three production wells in Water District 1 intended
to provide drinking water to several water districts in the Vestal area. The well is contaminated
with several volatile organic compounds (VOCs), including trichloroethylene (TCE). Well 1-1
was the main source of water for District 1 until 1980, when it was closed. Well 1-2 was the
main source of water until 1988, but it is permanently incapacitated as a result of wellscreen
problems. Well 1-3 now is the primary supply of drinking water to the service area. The original
Vestal Water Supply Site also contained Well 4-2 in District 4. However, this well was separated
into its own NPL site, Vestal Water Supply Well 4-2, when it was discovered that the District 1
and 4 wells were contaminated by two separate sources. Well 1-1 has pumped contaminated
groundv/a.ter into the Susquehanna River since 1980, in order to prevent the contaminant plume
from affecting other District 1 wells. In late 1982, a preliminary investigation was conducted to
determine the nature and extent of the contamination. The industrial park along Stage Road was
implicated as a possible source. Approximately 27,000 people reside in the Town of Vestal, and
approximately 17,000 rely on public water supplies for drinking water.
....,• ™ ••-,.• jj ^ ^ u NPL LISTING HISTORY
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through
Federal actions.
Threats and Contaminants
Proposed Date: 12/30/82
Final Date: 09/08/83
Pollution from the Stage Road Industrial Park has caused the groundwater to be
contaminated with volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and, to a lesser extent, heavy
metals. Soils in the industrial park also contain VOCs and heavy metals. The use of
untreated water from Well 1-1 by the residents of Vestal could have exposed a
significant portion of the town's population to contaminants before the well was taken
out of service in 1980. The western portion of the study area includes several
wetlands and a State-owned forest. The site also borders the Susquehanna River and
Choconut Creek, which face potential pollution from groundwater contaminant
migration.
December 1994
-------
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in three stages: immediate actions and two long-term remedial phases
focusing on cleanup of the groundwater and source control.
Response Action Status
Immediate Actions: Well 1-1 was closed in 1980.
Groundwater: Based on the results of the site investigation performed by the State,
EPA selected a remedy of air stripping treatment for Well 1-1. This remedy was
intended to accomplish the following: restoration of District 1 water supply capacity
to the level that existed prior to the loss of Well 1-1; provision of a water supply to the district
that provides a high level of public health protection; hydraulic containment of the plume
contaminants by pumping Well 1-1, thereby protecting other District 1 water supply wells; and
treatment of groundwater from Well 1-1 by air stripping to stop the discharge of contaminated
water to the Susquehanna River. Well 1-1 presently is being replaced by EPA with a new well,
designated Well 1-1 A, which was integrated with the air stripping facility and began operation in
1994.
Source Control: The EPA completed an investigation that identified specific source
areas of contamination within the industrial park and evaluated possible contaminant
source control measures to eliminate further pollution of the groundwater. The
selected remedy is underway and includes treatment of contaminated soils by in-place vapor
extraction and monitoring of groundwater, with future treatment for heavy metals as necessary.
Design of the remedy was completed in 1994 and cleanup is underway.
Environmental Progress
By closing down the contaminated well and making Well 1-3 the primary supplier of drinking
water, residents no longer are exposed to contaminated drinking water. Well 1-1 is being
replaced, the new well will be used for the public water supply, and groundwater will no longer
be pumped into the Susquehanna River, thus protecting the public health and the environment.
Soil cleanup actions are eliminating the sources of contamination at the site.
December 1994 2 VESTAL WATER SUPPLY WELL 1-1
-------
VESTAL WATER Epf REG|ON 2
Broome County
SUPPLY r~1 Vestal
WELL 4-2
NEW YORK
EPA ID# NYD980652267
Site Description
The Vestal Water Supply Well 4-2 site is a municipal well contaminated by a bulk chemical
handling facility. Contamination was discovered in 1980, and the well was taken out of service.
The well has been contaminated with trichloroethane, trichloroethylene (TCE), and other
solvent-related compounds. Similar contaminants were detected in Well 1-1, which is located in
Water District 1. The original Vestal Water Supply Site was separated into two sites; the other
site is known as Vestal Water Supply Well 1-1. These sites were split as a result of discovering
that the separate plumes of contaminated groundwater emanate from two different sources.
Approximately 27,000 people reside within 3 miles of the site, and 17,000 people rely on public
water supplies for drinking water.
o-* D -UT* TT,• •* • u • AA A^ u NPL LISTING HISTORY
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through Proposed Date: 12/30/82
Federal and Slate actions.
Final Date: 09/08/83
Threats and Contaminants
Groundwater is contaminated with volatile organic compounds (VOCs) including
TCE. Ingesting or coming into contact with contaminated groundwater may be a
potential health threat.
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in two stages: an initial action and a long-term remedial phase
focusing on cleanup of the entire site.
November 1994
-------
Response Action Status
Initial Action: In 1980, Well 4-2 was closed to protect the public's water supply.
Entire Site: The State signed a settlement agreement with three potentially
responsible parties in 1984, which outlined cleanup actions and a series of
groundwater standards that must be achieved. Since early 1989, the site has been
undergoing cleanup through the use of carbon filtration and an air stripping process that removes
volatile contaminants by exposure to air. These ongoing treatment activities are addressing the
groundwater contamination at the site. The State has identified the upgradient Monarch Chemical
property as a source of the contamination at Well 4-2. Further efforts to identify specific areas
of soil contamination are presently underway.
Environmental Progress
By closing Well 4-2, exposure to contaminants by ingesting groundwater was initially reduced,
thereby protecting the public health. Since 1989, groundwater treatment systems have been
operating at the site and continue to reduce groundwater contamination levels.
November 1 994
VESTAL WATER SUPPLY WELL 4-2
-------
VOLNEY MUNICIPA
LANDFILL
NEW YORK
EPA ID# NYD980509376
Site Description
EPA REGION 2
[swego County
Road in Volney
Other Names:
Silk Road Landfill
Valley Sanitary Landfill
The Volney Municipal Landfill is an 85-acre landfill in a rural area of the Town of Volney, in
Oswego County. The Oswego Valley Solid Refuse Disposal District Board owned and operated
the landfill from 1969 to 1975, when Oswego County bought it. From 1969 to 1983, the unlined
landfill accepted municipal wastes from homes, businesses, and light industries. From 1974 to
1975, the landfill accepted up to 8,000 barrels containing chemical residues from a local
hazardous waste treatment facility. Between 50 to 200 barrels contained liquids of unknown
volume and composition. During 1976 to 1978, the landfill accepted industrial sludges, which
have since been designated as hazardous wastes under the Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act (RCRA). As the landfill expanded during the 1970s, a leachate drainage system was
developed in the central portion of the site and was later connected to a leachate collection system
installed in 1982 in the north end of the site. The County ceased disposal operations at the
landfill in 1983, and by the fall of 1985, the County completed closure of the landfill. Contami-
nants from the landfill have migrated to sediments, groundwater, and surface water in the
surrounding area. Approximately 225 residents within 1 mile of the site use groundwater from
private wells. Twenty-five households within 1,000 feet of the landfill rely on groundwater as a
primary supply of drinking water.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through a
combination of Federal, State, and
potentially responsible parties' actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 10/15/84
Final Date: 06/10/86
Threats and Contaminants
The groundwater contains heavy metals, including arsenic, barium, cadmium,
chromium, mercury, and nickel. Sediments, surface water, and leachate from the
landfill contain heavy metals and volatile organic compounds (VOCs), including
benzene. Potential pathways of exposure to the contaminants at the site include
drinking contaminated groundwater and surface water and accidental ingestion of
contaminated sediments and soil. Eating contaminated fish or animals could pose a
health threat, as well. Groundwater that serves as the drinking water supply for local
residents may pose a risk. The streams and wetlands located adjacent to the landfill
could carry contaminants to more distant receptors.
November 1994
-------
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in two long-term remedial phases focusing on controlling the source
of contamination, and off-site contamination.
Response Action Status
Source Control: Measures to close the landfill were initiated in 1979, and were
completed in 1985. These included capping the top of the landfill with a plastic
liner, capping of the side slopes with compacted soil, installing a gas collection
system, and installing a leachate collection system. A source control investigation to determine
the nature and extent of the contamination at the site and to evaluate cleanup alternatives was
conducted during 1985 to 1987. In 1987, the EPA chose the following methods to prevent the
landfill from polluting the groundwater and surface water: construction of a supplemental cap on
the side slopes of the landfill; installation of a more extensive leachate collection system, with
accompanying slurry walls; and construction of an on-site leachate treatment plant, or transporta-
tion of the leachate to an off-site treatment facility. Currently, a pre-cleanup design study is
underway to re-evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the slurry walls, collect information to base a
final decision concerning on-site versus off-site leachate treatment, evaluate leachate disposal
requirements in regard to finding that a RCRA-listed hazardous waste was placed in the landfill,
and evaluate significant improvements in landfill capping design developed since the remedy was
chosen. Final cleanup actions will begin once design of the selected remedies have been
completed, which is scheduled for 1996.
Off-Site Contamination: An investigation of site contamination pathways that may
have led to off-site contamination is currently on-hold pending the collection of data
from the pre-cleanup design study.
Site Facts: In May 1979, the State of New York entered into an Administrative Order on
Consent with Oswego County that required groundwater monitoring, leachate disposal evaluation
and the development of a landfill closure plan. Closure of the landfill was completed in 1985.
The EPA and the potentially responsible parties signed an Administrative Order on Consent in
September 1990 for an investigation of contamination pathways, and the EPA and the potentially
responsible parties signed an Administrative Order on Consent for the parties to conduct the
supplemental pre-cleanup design study in June 1993.
Environmental Progress
The landfill has been capped, reducing the potential for direct contact with waste materials. The
EPA has selected cleanup technologies to further control the source of contamination. Cleanup
actions will begin at the Volney Municipal Landfill site, once the current remedy design activities
are completed.
November 1994 2 VOLNEY MUNICIPAL LANDFILL
-------
WARWICK LANDEttt'*W~ £~-rJ I
Other Names:
Penaluna Landfill
Site Description
The Warwick Landfill site is an unlined landfill that transects a small valley and occupies roughly
13 acres of a former 25-acre leasehold area in the Town of Warwick. The surrounding area is
hilly, interspersed with both residential and wooded areas. Both wetlands and rock outcroppings
lie next to the landfill areas. In the mid-1950s, the Town of Warwick leased the property from
the Penaluna family and utilized it as a refuse disposal area. Evidence indicates that there was
some industrial waste disposed of at the landfill during this time. The Town of Warwick
operated the landfill until 1977, at which time the owner leased it to Grace Disposal and Leasing,
Ltd. In 1979, New York State sampled leachate seeping from the site and detected volatile
organic compounds (VOCs), heavy metals and phenols, some of which exceeded State Drinking
Water Standards and the EPA Drinking Water Regulations. The State then issued a restraining
order and closed the landfill. Groundwater contamination is the main concern, because
approximately 2,100 residents within 2 miles of the site depend on private wells for drinking
water. The closest home is 250 feet south of the site. Greenwood Lake, a recreational
community, lies about 11/2 miles southwest of the site. Although residences in this community
are hooked up to a public water supply, dwellings outside the village rely on private wells.
OM n -U-I-* TU• •* • u • AA AA.V, NPL LISTING HISTORY
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through
Federal, State, and potentially
responsible parties' actions.
Proposed Date: 09/18/85
Final Date: 03/31/89
Threats and Contaminants
On-site groundwater contains low levels of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), semi-
volatile and metals. Leachate, surface water, and sediments at the site contain low
levels of VOCs, as well as phenol and heavy metals including chromium, mercury,
lead, and copper. The exposure of greatest concern to public health is from ingestion
and exposure to contaminated groundwater. Sampling has indicated that three private
wells near the landfill contain VOCs, in concentrations that exceed State or Federal
Drinking Water Standards. These residences are being provided with bottled water and
carbon filtration units by the State. Approximately forty other residential wells in the
area were sampled and found to be safe for potable uses.
November 1994
-------
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in two long-term remedial phases focusing on source control and
controlling the migration of contaminants.
Response Action Status
Source Control: In 1991, the EPA completed an investigation of groundwater,
surface water, and soil contamination at the site. The EPA then selected a remedy
which includes capping the landfill and providing an interim measure to ensure that
area residents have a safe drinking water supply. Design of the remedy is underway.
Migration Control: In 1992, the EPA began investigations into the extent of
contaminant migration from the site, and options to control migration of contaminants.
Based on the results of the investigations, scheduled for completion in 1995, the EPA
will select a remedy for final cleanup.
Site Facts: In February 1992, four potentially responsible parties agreed to comply with an
Unilateral Administrative Order to design and construct the selected remedy. Subsequently, in
April 1993, another four potentially responsible parties were also issued a Unilateral
Administrative Order for addressing the source of site contamination.
Environmental Progress
After adding the Warwick Landfill site to the NPL, the EPA conducted an initial evaluation and
determined that no immediate actions are needed. The three residences that have VOC
contamination above State or Federal drinking water standards have been provided bottled water
and point-of-use treatment systems to maintain a safe drinking water supply while cleanup actions
are planned.
November 1994 2 WARWICK LANDFILL
-------
WIDE BEACH
DEVELOPMENT
NEW YORK
EPA ID# NYD980652259
Site Description
EPA REGION 2
Erie County
Brant
Wide Beach Development is a 55-acre suburban development of 60 homes located in Brant, a
small community on Lake Erie, north of the Cattaraugus Indian Reservation. From 1968 to
1978, the Wide Beach Homeowners' Association applied about 155 cubic meters of waste oil to
the local roadways to control dust. Some of the oil was contaminated with polychlorinated
biphenyls (PCBs). As a result, roads, driveways, parking spaces, storm drains, and homes were
contaminated from the oil applications. In 1980, workers excavated soil from around the
roadways while installing a sanitary sewer line in the development. Unaware that a PCB problem
existed, some residents used this soil as fill in their yards and in a community recreational area.
Subsequent sampling revealed PCBs in the air, road dust, soil, vacuum cleaner dust, and water
samples from private wells. Lake Erie is the western boundary of Wide Beach Development.
The site drains through a system of swales and ditches into a stream and marsh south of the
development. This stream flows into Lake Erie, as does surface runoff from the site. The area
around the site is residential and agricultural. All residences in the development receive their
water from private wells. Approximately 5,000 people within a 3-mile radius of the site depend
on municipal and private wells for drinking supplies.
Site Responsibility:
This site was addressed through
Federal actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 12/30/82
Final Date: 09/08/83
Deleted Date: 08/30/94
Threats and Contaminants
m
PCBs were detected in the air, groundwater, sediments, soil, and surface water.
Wetlands near the site were also contaminated with PCBs. Health hazards included
coming into direct contact with contaminated soils, ingesting contaminated water, or
inhaling contaminated vapors.
November 1994
-------
Clean-up Approach
Response Action Status
Emergency Actions: In 1985, in response to the levels of PCBs found in Wide
Beach homes, EPA acted to protect residents from contaminated runoff and dust until
a long-term remedy could be applied. This emergency action included paving the
roadways, driveways, and drainage ditches; decontaminating the homes by vacuuming, rug
shampooing, and replacing air conditioner and furnace filters; installing particulate filters on
individual wells to protect the population from the sporadic PCB contamination in the ground-
water; and repairing a storm drain to alleviate flooding problems. In late 1990, additional well
water sampling and the replacement of existing filters were performed to ensure public safety.
Entire Site: In 1985, following an investigation to determine the nature and extent of
the contamination at and emanating from the site, a remedy was selected. The selected
remedy called for: excavating the PCB-contaminated soils in the roadways, drainage
ditches, driveways, yards, and wetlands; chemically treating the PCB-contaminated soils; back-
filling excavated areas with treated soils; and repaving the roadways and driveways. A
treatability study showed that the selected approach for chemically neutralizing the
PCB-contaminated soils would be effective. Final clean-up actions began in early 1990 and the
treatment of contaminated soils was completed in the fall of 1991.
Wetland Restoration: Restoration of an on-site wetland area, which was
unavoidably damaged by site clean-up activities, was completed in the fall of 1992.
Site Facts: A Notice of Intent to Delete the site from the NPL was published in the Federal
Register on March 31, 1994. The public comment period associated ended on April 30, 1994.
Environmental Progress
EPA performed numerous emergency response actions at the Wide Beach Development to make
conditions safer for the residents while the long-term cleanup actions took place. Public health
and the environment is protected now that the excavation and treatment of the PCB-contaminated
soils has been completed. The site was deleted from the NPL on August 30, 1994.
November 1994 2 WIDE BEACH DEVELOPMENT
-------
YORK OIL
COMPANY
NEW YORK
EPA ID# NYD000511733 T /^j B ^ Pierce Dump
Site Description
Epf «®°N 2
Franklin County
The York Oil Company recycled waste oil at this 17-acre site, 1 mile northwest of Moira, from
1962 until 1975. In 1975, the facility was sold to another industrial waste collector. In 1980, the
property was transferred to two Moira residents who salvaged the metal storage tanks and sold a
portion of the property later that year. The facility's operators collected crankcase industrial oils,
some containing poly chlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), from sources throughout New England and
New York. They stored or processed the oils at the site in eight aboveground storage tanks, a
series of three earthen-dammed settling lagoons, and at least one underground storage tank. The
recycled PCB-contaminated oil either was sold as No. 2 fuel oil or was used in dust control for
the unpaved roads in the vicinity of the site. During heavy rains and spring thaws, the oil-water
mixture from the lagoons often would overflow onto surrounding lands and into adjacent
wetlands, which the company purchased in 1964. Contamination at the site first was reported by
a State road crew in 1979. In 1982, the County assumed the property title because of unpaid
property taxes. Approximately 1,700 people live within a 3-mile radius of the site; 400 live
within a mile. Residents rely on private wells for drinking water; 13 wells exist within 1/2 mile
of the site. Recent sampling of well water in the area has revealed no site-related contaminants.
_. _ .. .... _ . v . ,. ,, , , . NPL LISTING HISTORY
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through
Federal, State, and potentially responsi-
ble parties' actions.
Threats and Contaminants —
Proposed Date: 07/23/82
Final Date: 09/08/83
Groundwater, soils, sludge, sediments, and surface water are contaminated with
phenolics, heavy metals, volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and PCBs. The ground-
water used by area residents for drinking water is not contaminated; however, there is
a potential that pollutants may migrate and reach the private wells. People who touch
or accidentally ingest contaminated surface water, sediments, soil, or sludge may be at
risk. Wetlands near the site are sensitive environments that may be threatened by
contaminants. The wildlife inhabiting the wetlands also may be harmed by pollutants
from the site.
November 1994
-------
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in three stages: emergency actions and two long-term remedial phases
focusing on source control and cleanup of the contamination pathways.
Response Action Status
Emergency Actions: EPA began emergency cleanup activities at the site in 1980.
Workers secured the site to limit access and to reduce the threat of direct contact
with hazardous substances. Oil and contaminated water were removed from the
lagoons, which then were filled with a concrete by-product and sand. The top 3 feet of
oil-soaked soil were excavated from the neighboring wetlands. Contaminated oil was transferred
to aboveground storage tanks, and contaminated soil was contained on the site. Contaminated
surface water from one of the lagoons was treated and discharged into the wetlands. An
interceptor trench was dug to alter the flow of surface water and ground water. EPA conducted
additional emergency actions in 1983. Oil seeping into drainage ditches was collected, a new
filter fence system was installed, and warning signs were posted. EPA began collecting oily
leachate, replacing sorbent pads, and monitoring the site. In the summer of 1992, EPA stabilized
leaking tanks and drums.
Source Control: Upon completion of an investigation to determine the nature and
extent of contamination at the site and to evaluate cleanup alternatives, in 1988, EPA
selected a remedy for controlling the source of the contamination. It features:
excavating approximately 30,000 cubic yards of contaminated soils and solidifying this material
on-site; installing deep groundwater wells at the edges of the site to collect a sinking contami-
nated plume; installing shallow dewatering wells to collect contaminated groundwater and oil
during excavation; treating these liquids and discharging the clean groundwater in accordance
with State environmental requirements; removing about 25,000 gallons of contaminated tank oils
and other oils collected at the site to an EPA-approved facility for incineration; cleaning and
demolishing the empty storage tanks; backfilling the solidified soil into the excavated areas; and
inspecting the site every five years to assure that human health and the environment continue to
be protected. The proposed solidification process will be studied by EPA to ensure its effective-
ness. Should it be determined during pre-cleanup design treatability studies that solidification
will not provide the desired degree of treatment, the feasibility of incinerating the soils on-site
will be investigated. The cleanup design is currently underway.
Off-Site Contamination: The State began an intensive study of the contamination
pathways, particularly the PCB-contaminated wetlands, in 1986. This study was
continued by EPA in the fall of 1988. This investigation, planned for completion in
1995, is exploring the nature and extent of pollution problems emanating from the site and will
result in the identification of the best strategies for final cleanup.
November 1994 2 YORK OIL COMPANY
-------
Site Facts: A Consent Decree was signed by EPA and several potentially responsible parties in
1990 in which they agreed to perform the engineering design and the implementation of the
source control remedy. The Consent Decree was lodged in Federal district court in June 1991.
In response to substantive comments that were received from non-settling potentially responsible
parties during the public comment period, a revised Consent Decree was lodged on May 15,
1992. In 1993, it was decided to withdraw this Consent Decree and attempt a global settlement
with all of the potentially responsible parties. The potentially responsible parties began a
contamination pathways investigation in the spring of 1992, pursuant to a Consent Order. An
Interim Ecological Investigation Report was submitted to EPA in early 1994.
Environmental Progress
EPA performed numerous emergency removal actions and erected a security fence to limit access
to the site. These actions have reduced the potential for exposure to hazardous materials at the
York Oil Company site while cleanup actions for on-site contamination are designed and further
studies of off-site contamination are taking place.
YORK OIL COMPANY 3 November 1994
• U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1 995-386-54 1 /2202 3
------- |