&EPA
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Solid Waste And
Emergency Response
(5201 G)
EPA/540/R-95/112
PB95-962944
9200.5-741C
May 1995
 SUPERFUND:
             Progress at
             National
             Priority
             List Sites
      TENNESSEE
      1995 UPDATE
 Printed on Recycled Paper

-------
                    How  to  Use  the  NPL  Book
o
   The site fact sheets presented in this book
    are comprehensive summaries that cover a
broad range of information. The fact sheets
describe hazardous waste sites on the NPL and
their locations, as well as the conditions
leading to their listing ("Site Description").
The summaries list the types of contaminants
that have been discovered and related threats
to public and ecological health ("Threats and
Contaminants").  "Cleanup Approach" pres-
ents an overview of the cleanup activities
completed, underway, or planned. The fact
sheets conclude with a brief synopsis of how
much progress has been made in protecting
public health and the environment. The
summaries also pinpoint other actions, such as
legal efforts to involve polluters responsible
for site contamination and community con-
cerns.

The fact sheets are arranged in alphabetical
order by site name. Because site cleanup is a
dynamic and gradual process,  all site informa-
tion is accurate as of the date shown on the
bottom of each page.  Progress is always being
made at NPL sites, and the EPA periodically
will update the site fact sheets to reflect recent
actions. The following two pages show a
generic fact sheet and briefly describe the
information under each section.
           How Can You Use
           This State  Book?
               You can use this book to keep informed
               about the sites that concern you, particu-
           larly ones close to home. The EPA is commit-
           ted to involving the public in the decision
           making process associated with hazardous
           waste cleanup. The Agency solicits input from
           area residents in communities affected by
           Superfund sites. Citizens are likely to be
           affected not only by hazardous site conditions,
           but also by the remedies that combat them.
           Site cleanups take many forms and can affect
           communities in different ways.  Local traffic
           may be rerouted, residents may be relocated,
           temporary water supplies may be necessary.

           Definitive information on a site can help
           citizens sift through alternatives and make
           decisions. To make good choices, you must
           know what the threats are and how the EPA
                                           intends to clean up the site.  You must under-
                                           stand the cleanup alternatives being proposed
                                           for site cleanup and how residents may be
                                           affected by each one. You also need to have
                                           some idea of how your community intends to
                                           use the site in the future, and you need to know
                                           what the community can realistically expect
                                           once the cleanup is complete.

                                           The EPA wants to develop cleanup methods
                                           that meet community needs, but the Agency
                                           only can take local concerns into account if it
                                           understands what they are.  Information must
                                           travel both  ways in order for cleanups to be
                                           effective and satisfactory. Please take this
                                           opportunity to learn more, become involved,
                                           and assure that hazardous waste cleanup at
                                           "your" site considers your community's
                                           concerns.

-------
  NPL LISTING HISTORY
Provides the dates when the
site was Proposed, made Final,
and Deleted from the NPL.
  SITE RESPONSIBILITY
 Identifies the Federal, State,
 and/or potentially responsible
 parties taking responsibility
 for cleanup actions at the site.
     ENVIRONMENTAL
         PROGRESS
 Summarizes the actions to
 reduce the threats to nearby
 residents and the surrounding
 environment and the progress
 towards cleaning up the site.
  SITE NAME
  STATE
  EPA ID* ABCOOOOOOO
                                  Site Description
EPA REGION XX
   COUNTY NAME
     LOCATION
   Other Names:
                                                                                                       I
     : xxx xxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxx :
          ; xxxxxxxxxx xxxx xxxxxxxx xxxx xx xxxxxxxxx xx xxxxxx xxxxxxxx I
             : xxx xxxxxxxxxxxxx xx xxxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx x xxx :
  xxxxxxx xxx xxxxfetajtxxxxx xxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxxxx xxxxxxxx xxxx xxxxxxxxxx :
  XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX^JIK^X XXX XX XXXXXXXXX XXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX
  XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXX H II MlTl IIHJIII II II II XXXXXXXX XXXXX XXXX XXXXX XXX XXX XXXXXX
  xxxxxxxxxxxx xx xxxxxxx xxx  ii ii ii ii ii imPum Jin n xxxxxx xx xxxx xxx xxxxx xxx xxxxx xxx xxxxx
  Site Responsibility:
                   xxxxxx xxx xxxxx ;
                   xxxxxx xxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxx
                   xxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxx
   NPL Listing History
     Proposed XX/XX/XX
      Final: XXflCX/XX
  Threats and Contaminants
                                         XXXXXX XXX XXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX
                                         XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XX XXXXXXXXX
                                         XXXXXXXX XXX XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXX XXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX XX XXXXXX
                                         XXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXX XXXXXX XXXXXX XXXXX XXXXXX
                                  XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXX X XXX XX
                                  XXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXX
                                  Cleanup Approach
                                  XXXXXX XXX XXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                  xxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx xxxx xxxxxxxx xxxx xx xxxxxxxxx xx xxxxxx xx;
                                  XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXX XXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX XX XXXXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXX X XXX XXXXXXXX
                                   Response Action Status
        XXXXXX XXX XXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX :
        XXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XX XXXXXXXXX XX XXXXXX \
        XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXX XXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX XX XXXXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXX X :
        XXXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXX XXXXXX XXXXXX XXXXX XXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX :
  XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXX X XXX XX XXXXXXXXX XXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXX
  XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXX XXXX XXXXX XXX
  XXX XXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX XX XXXXXXX XXX XXXXXX XX XXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXX :
  Site Facts:
             XXXXXX XXX XXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX
  XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XX XXXXXXXXX XX XXXXXX
  xxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxx xxx xxxxxxxxxxxxx xx xxxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx x. xxx
^HXXXXXX XXX XXXXXX
  Environmental Progress
  XXXXXX XXX XXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX
  XXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XX XXXXXXXXX XX XXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXX
  XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXX XXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX XX XXXXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXX X XXX XXXXXXXXXX
  XXXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXX XXXXXX XXXXXX XXX XXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX
                                   Site Repository
                                   XXXXXX XXX XXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX
                                                             SITE REPOSITORY
                                           Lists the location of the primary site repository. The site
                                           repository may include community relations plans, public
                                           meeting announcements and minutes, fact sheets, press
                                           releases, and other site-related documents.

-------
                                         SITE DESCRIPTION

                This section describes the location and history of the site.  It includes descrip-
                tions of the most recent activities and past actions at the site that have con-
                tributed to the contamination.  Population estimates, land usages, and nearby
                resources give readers background on the local setting surrounding the site.
                                   THREATS AND CONTAMINANTS

                The major chemical categories of site contamination are noted, as well as
                which environmental resources are affected. Icons representing each of the
                affected resources (may include air, groundwater, surface water, soil, and
                contamination to environmentally sensitive areas) are included in the margins
                of this section. Potential threats to residents and the surrounding environ-
                ments arising from the site contamination also are described.
                                        CLEANUP APPROACH

                This section contains a brief overview of how the site is being cleaned up.
®
                     RESPONSE ACTION STATUS

Specific actions that have been accomplished or will be undertaken to clean
up the site are described here. Cleanup activities at NPL sites are divided
into separate phases, depending on the complexity and required actions at the
site. Two major types of cleanup activities often are described: initial,
immediate, or emergency actions to quickly remove or reduce imminent
threats to the community and surrounding areas; and long-term remedial
phases directed at final cleanup at the site. Each stage of the cleanup strategy
is presented in this section of the summary. Icons representing the stage of
the cleanup process (initial actions, site investigations, EPA selection of the
cleanup remedy, engineering design phase, cleanup activities underway, and
completed cleanup) are located in the margin next to each activity descrip-
tion.
                                             SITE FACTS

                Additional information on activities and events at the site are included in this
                section.  Often details on legal or administrative actions taken by the EPA to
                achieve site cleanup or other facts pertaining to community involvement with
                the site cleanup process are reported here.

-------
     Guide  to  the  NPL  Book  Icons
The "icons," or symbols, accompanying the text allow the reader to see at a glance which envi-
ronmental resources are affected and the status of cleanup activities at the site.
   Icons in the Threats
    and Contaminants
            Section
Icons in  the Response
Action Status  Section
        Contaminated Groundwater re-
        sources in the vicinity or underlying
        the site.  (Groundwater is often used
        as a drinking water source.)

        Contaminated Surface Water and
        Sediments on or near the site.
        (These include lakes, ponds,
        streams, and rivers.)

        Contaminated Air in the vicinity of
        the site.  (Air pollution usually is
        periodic and involves contaminated
        dust particles or hazardous gas
        emissions.)

        Contaminated Soil and Sludges on
        or near the site. (This contamination
        category may include bulk or other
        surface hazardous wastes found on
        the site.)

        Threatened or contaminated Envi-
        ronmentally Sensitive Areas in the
        vicinity of the site. (Examples
        include wetlands and coastal areas
        or critical habitats.)
      Initial, Immediate, or Emergency
      Actions have been taken or are
      underway to eliminate immediate
      threats at the site.

      Site Studies at the site to determine
      the nature and extent of contamina-
      tion are planned or underway.

      Remedy Selected indicates that site
      investigations have been concluded,
      and the EPA has selected a final
      cleanup remedy for the site or part
      of the site.

      Remedy Design means that engi-
      neers are preparing specifications
      and drawings for the selected
      cleanup technologies.

      Cleanup Ongoing indicates that the
      selected cleanup remedies for the
      contaminated site, or part of the site,
      currently are underway.

      Cleanup Complete shows that all
      cleanup goals have been achieved
      for the contaminated site or part of
      the site.

-------
    EPA ID
   NUMBER                    SITE NAME
TND007018799 AMERICAN CREOSOTE WORKS (JACKSON PLANT)
TND980729172 AMNICOLA DUMP
TND980468557 ARLINGTON BLENDING & PACKAGING
TN8570024044 ARNOLD ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT CENTER (USAF)
TND044062222 CARRIER AIR CONDITIONING CO.
TND987768546 CHEMET CO.
TND980728992 GALLAWAY PITS
TND987767795 ICG ISELIN RAILROAD YARD
TND98072911 5 LEWISBURG DUMP
TND075453688 MALLORY CAPACITOR CO.
TN4210020570 MEMPHIS DEFENSE DEPOT
TN0210020582 MILAN ARMY AMMUNITION PLANT
TND980728836 MURRAY-OHIO DUMP
TND980558894 NORTH HOLLYWOOD DUMP
TN1890090003 OAK RIDGE RESERVATION (USDOE)
TND071516959 TENNESSEE PRODUCTS
TND980559033 VELSICOL CHEMICAL CORP. (HARDEMAN COUNTY)
TND980844781 WRIGLEY CHARCOAL PLANT

-------
AMERICAN
CREOSOTE
WORKS,  INC.
(JACKSON PLANT)
TENNESSEE
EPA ID# TND007018799
Site  Description   	
                                         REGION 4
                                      Madison County
                                     South of Jackson
The 60-acre American Creosote Works (Jackson Plant) site was a wood-treatment plant that
began operations in the early 1930s and continued until late 1981, when the company filed for
bankruptcy. Originally, the site consisted of the treatment buildings, pressure cylinders, boiler
room tanks, oil storage tanks, tank cars, and railroad tracks. There also were four large
waste water lagoons, two sand filter units, and drip yards. Operators used creosote and
pentachlorophenol (PCP) to treat and preserve wood. Workers discharged process wastewater
directly to the South Fork of the  Forked Deer River until 1973, when a levee was built around
the facility to contain surface water runoff and wastewater.  In 1974 the plant installed a
wastewater treatment system. The pits created during construction of the levee were used to store
treated process water and derivative  sludges. Subsequently, flooding from the accumulation of
rainfall caused the lagoons to overflow into the main process area. Jackson has a population of
more than 60,000.  A city well field lies approximately IVi miles east of the site, and several
public and private wells are located within a 3-mile radius.  The closest homes are located within
a mile of the site. Homes with private wells are located upgradient from the site, a situation that
lessens risk. The south fork of the Deer River, less than 1A mile from the site, receives runoff
from the site via Central Creek and an unnamed tributary that follows the southern border of the
site.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal and State actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 10/15/84
  Final Date: 06/10/86
                                                                      March 1995

-------
Threats and Contaminants
          Groundwater underlying the facility and on-site soils are contaminated with volatile
          organic compounds (VOCs), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and heavy
          metals from the wood-treating processes. On-site sediments contain PAH levels
          similar to those in soils. Cleanup workers may incur a health risk if they accidentally
          ingest contaminated soil or water. Wetlands lying along both sides of the river support
          a large variety of wildlife species.
Cleanup Approach  	

The site is being addressed in four stages: immediate actions and three long-term remedial phases
focusing on cleanup of the entire site, groundwater, and soils and sludges.
Response Action Status
           Immediate Actions: In 1983, the EPA removed 30 million gallons of water from
           the site, treated 500,000 gallons of contaminated water, and solidified more than
           100,000 cubic yards of sludge from on-site lagoons and treatment areas. Workers
placed the solidified materials in an old lagoon and capped it with clay to await further cleanup.
In 1986, EPA emergency response staff treated about 225,000 gallons of contaminated water
from the storage tanks using hydrated lime and polymers, and 28,000 gallons of oil were
consolidated in one secured tank. Workers built covers for the treatment system and for the open
storage tanks. In 1988, the tank area and a large portion of the site was fenced. In 1989, the
EPA completed a modification of the drainage system on the river side of the site.

           Entire Site: In 1990,  the contaminated soils and sludges were removed from the
           process area and  incinerated off-site; all tank liquids were treated and disposed of; a
           security fence was installed around the entire perimeter of the site; and the process
equipment was dismantled and the majority of it salvaged.  Some construction debris remains on
the site. The  State repaired the levee on the river side of the site, and a sump pump and a large
drainage pipe to the river were installed.

           Groundwater: During a hydrogeological investigation completed in 1993,
           information was gathered to model the groundwater flow and the semi-confining clay
           layer under the site. Based on the investigation, the EPA determined that off-site
groundwater  is not significantly effected by the site and that no further action is required.
 March 1 995                                   2   AMERICAN CREOSOTE WORKS (JACKSON PLANT)

-------
           Soils and Sludges: An investigation, which focused on process area soils and
           sludges, was initiated in the summer of 1993.  Preliminary results indicated
           significant shallow subsurface soil contamination with creosote in the process area as
well as over the remaining areas  of the site. The investigation is expected to be completed in
1995 and will determine alternatives for treating contaminated soils and sludges.

Site Facts: A Superfund State Contract was signed in May  1989.  In December 1989, the EPA
signed an Interagency Agreement with the U.S. Geological Survey for a hydrogeological survey
to determine the nature and extent of contamination of the groundwater at the site.
Environmental Progress  ^f-
The numerous actions to treat and contain wastes and to build a perimeter security fence at the
site have reduced the potential for exposure to hazardous materials at the site.  Results of
investigations indicated that the city's groundwater supply is not affected by site contamination.
Final cleanup activities for soils and sludges are being investigated.
Site Repository
Jackson-Madison County Library, 433 Lafayette Street, East, Jackson, TN 38301
AMERICAN CREOSOTE WORKS (JACKSON PLANT)  3
March 1995

-------
AMNICOLA
TENNESSEE        Jl\\/      ••rjrwr/r     In Chattanooga, along the east bank
EPAID#TND980729172            >                   of *. T,n™»«, RK,K
Site Description
The Amnicola Dump site is an 18-acre inactive construction debris disposal site located in
Chattanooga,  Tennessee. The site is situated along the eastern bank of the Tennessee River in an
industrial area, l/i mile upstream from the city's water intake. During the 1930's the site was
reportedly used for clay mining operations.  These operations resulted in several water-filled pits.
The Amnicola site was operated as a dump from 1970 until 1973 by the City of Chattanooga.
The dump operations were  closed in 1973 due to concerns of unauthorized dumping and the
discharge of leachate from  the site into the Tennessee River.  Elevated levels of 10 inorganic
compounds were detected in the leachate  streams. Water quality downstream in the Tennessee
River was not noticeably affected.  The site owner reportedly handled, stored, and burned
creosote-contaminated railroad ties. This activity has contributed to the elevated creosote
contamination in the site's surface  soil. Approximately 150,000 people live within a 2-mile
radius of the site. There are no residences located within the immediate 1A mile radius of the
site.
o-   n        -U-I-      TU          jj    A u    u             NPL LISTING HISTORY
Site Responsibility:   This site was addressed through              Proposed Date- 12/30/82
                                                                Final Date: 09/08/83
Federal and potentially responsible
parries' actions.
Threats and Contaminants
          On-site surface soil and debris contained polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs).
          Groundwater monitoring indicated that chromium levels exceeded the primary
          drinking water standards in one monitoring well. No site-related contaminants have
          been found in the city's water supply. Direct contact with contaminated soil could
          have posed a threat to human health and the environment.
                                                                               March 1995

-------
Cleanup Approach
Response Action Status
          Entire Site: In 1993, all cleanup activities at the site were completed, which included
          excavating and disposing of contaminated soil and debris off site, and backfilling the
          area with crushed stone.  The site will undergo quarterly groundwater monitoring, and
the entire site will be reviewed in five  years to ensure the effectiveness of the remedy.

Site Facts: In 1991, the EPA and the parties potentially responsible  for site contamination
signed a Consent Decree for these parties to undertake engineering design and cleanup activities.
Environmental  Progress
All cleanup at the site is complete.  Excavating and disposing of contaminated soil and debris and
backfilling the area have reduced the threat of exposure to contamination at the site while
groundwater monitoring is conducted. The site will be reviewed in five years to ensure the
effectiveness of the remedy.
Site Repository
Chattanooga Hamilton County Bicentennial Library, Local History Dept.,  1001 Broad St.,
Chattanooga, TN 37402
March 1995
AMNICOLA DUMP

-------
ARLINGTON
AND  PACK
TENNESSEE
EPA ID# TND980468557
Site Description
                                       PA  REGION  4
                                         Shelby County
                                           Arlington
From 1971 to 1978, the more than 2 acre Arlington Blending and Packaging site housed a
pesticide blending and packaging operation, engaged in the mixing and packaging of various
pesticides, herbicides, and other chemical formulas. During normal business operations, spills
and leaks of chemicals handled at the site occurred. These chemicals soaked into site soils and
building flooring and migrated off site through surface runoff and drain ditches. In the mid-
1970s, the State took action against the company for its violations of the Clean Water Act,
demanding that it reduce pesticide contamination in tributaries leading to the Loosahatchie River
Canal. A 1976 report was issued by the company to satisfy State concerns.  In 1979, after
sampling the site and an adjacent housing development, the State recommended that the developer
install a fence between the homes and  the plant and apply 1 to 2 inches of clean topsoil in the
backyards of the two homes closest to the plant.  Between 1980 and 1983, the site owner removed
some pesticide wastes from the site. The site is bordered by the Tennessee Department of
Transportation facility to the west and a small residential area to the east of the site. The closest
home is 50 feet away. Approximately  2,700 people live within 3 miles of the site, drawing
drinking water from two water systems serving the communities of Arlington and Gallaway. An
Arlington City well is within 1,200 feet of the site. The site is in the flood plain of the
Loosahatchie River Canal, which is approximately  3,000 feet due north of the site. The probable
drainage route from the site leads to a nearby canal that is used for recreation.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal and potentially responsible
parties' actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 01/22/87
  Final Date: 07/22/87
Threats and  Contaminants
          In 1983, the EPA discovered high concentrations of various pesticides in on-site soils
          and around the housing development. In 1985, the State detected pesticides in a
          shallow monitoring well on the site. The three water-bearing zones under the site are
          used as drinking water sources and have the potential for contamination from pesticide
          residues at the site. The upper zone is contaminated with chlordane and other
          pesticides. Although removal actions have reduced  the potential for exposure of people
          to contaminants, any remaining groundwater contamination could threaten those who
          drink it.
                                                                            March 1995

-------
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in two stages: immediate actions and a long-term remedial phase
focusing on soil and groundwater cleanup.
Response Action Status
           Immediate Actions: In 1983, the EPA removed 3,500 gallons of chemicals from
           the drums, collected debris, and excavated 1,920 cubic yards of contaminated surface
           soils both on and off the site. All of the material was transported to EPA-approved
disposal facilities. In 1990, the EPA, while conducting an investigation, discovered a significant
concentration of pesticides in the  backyard of a residence adjacent to the site. Immediate actions
included the excavation and backfilling of the affected property, which eliminated the health risks
posed to the residents.

           Soil and Groundwater: In mid-1991, the EPA completed an intensive study of soil
           and groundwater  pollution at the site. The selected remedy includes: excavation and
           decontamination of contaminated soil through on-site thermal desorption; replacement
of the treated soil in excavated areas; dechlorination of liquids with off-site disposal; activated
carbon treatment of the contaminated groundwater, with  discharge of the treated effluent into a
local wastewater treatment plant;  and on-site solidification of soils containing arsenic and other
trace metals. The cleanup activities have begun. Groundwater cleanup will be initiated once the
soil cleanup is complete.

Site Facts: A Unilateral Administrative Order was issued in January  1992 to the potentially
responsible parties compelling them to perform the design and complete the cleanup activities at
the site.
Environmental Progress
The immediate soil and drum removal actions described above have reduced the potential for
exposure to hazardous materials at the Arlington Blending and Packaging site while cleanup
activities are underway.
Site Repository
Arlington Public Library, 11968 Walker Street, Arlington, TN 38002
March 1995
                                                       ARLINGTON BLENDING AND PACKAGING

-------
ARNOLD  ENGINEERING      prf™ «EG'°N 4
                                                    |,,...; Coffee and Franklin Counties
|"")F\/I-I OPI\/IEI\IT                      j:.:$ear Manchester and Tullahoma

CENTER(USA

TENNESSEE
EPA ID# TN8570024044

Site Description  	

The 32,000-acre Arnold Engineering Development Center (AEDC) is located in Coffee and
Franklin counties in south-central Tennessee near the cities of Manchester and Tullahoma.
AEDC is a test organization of the Air Force Material Command with the primary purpose of
simulating actual flight conditions in aerodynamic, propulsion, and space ground-test facilities.
In addition, AEDC conducts research and applies new technology  to improve environmental
facilities and associated testing techniques and instrumentation. The Camp Forrest Army
Training Center previously occupied the site, part of which was transferred to the federal
government by the state of Tennessee in  1951.  Approximately 30,000 acres of AEDC property
are heavily forested and is covered under a management plan allowing the Tennessee Wildlife
Resources Agency to operate and manage a wildlife program. Several potentially contaminated
source areas are located at the site, including Landfill No. 2, Leaching Pit No. 2, Retention
Reservoir, and the Main Testing Area. Landfill No. 2 is a 15-acre area used for disposal of
hazardous wastes.  Leaching Pit No. 2 was used for the disposal of chrome plating solutions and
other acidic wastes. The Retention Reservoir is a 175-acre impoundment,  which is used as a
retention basin for wastewaters and surface water runoff.  Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs),
trichloroethane, methylene chloride, and  toluene are reported to have entered the Retention
Reservoir. The Main Testing Area, situated on developed lands in the central portion of the site,
has been the site of a wide variety  of waste handling activities and spills involving jet and rocket
fuels, chlorofluorocarbon solvents, nitric  acid, and other shop wastes. Surface water runoff from
the Main Testing Area enters Woods Reservoir via several streams.  The AEDC drinking water
intake, which  serves 3,800 workers, is located at the confluence of Brumalow Creek and Woods
Reservoir.
«-   «       -L...     ^   •  •  ,  •    ,,    ,  u    u          NpL LISTING HISTORY
Site Responsibility:  The site is being addressed through          Proposed Date: 08/23/94
                     Federal actions.
                                                                        October 1 994

-------
Threats and  Contaminants
         Surface water and sediment samples collected from multiple locations downstream from
         the site are contaminated with PCBs. Soils at the Main Testing Area are contaminated
         with PCBs.   Fish tissue samples collected from Rollins/Rowland Creek and surface
         water from Bradley Creek and Brumalow Creek within the wildlife management area
         boundaries are contaminated with PCBs.  Touching or ingesting contaminated surface
         water, sediments, soils, or fish could have adverse health effects.
Cleanup Approach
This site will be addressed through a long-term remedial phase focusing on cleaning up the entire
site.
Response Action Status
          Entire Site: The EPA is planning site-wide investigations into the nature and extent
          of contamination at the site. Upon completion, final cleanup remedies will be
          selected.
Environmental Progress
The EPA has determined that the Arnold Engineering Development Center (USAF) site poses no
immediate threats to human health or the environment while it plans site-wide investigations.
Site Repository
Not yet established.
October 1994                               2           ARNOLD ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT
                                                                         CENTER (USAF)

-------
CARRIER AIR
CONDITION
COMPANY
TENNESSEE
EPA ID# TND044062222
                                    EPA REGION 4
                                         elby County
                                         Collierville
Site Description
Carrier Air Conditioning Company, part of United Technologies, manufactures residential air
conditioners on approximately 145 acres of land. Three releases of trichloroethylene (TCE) to the
environment have been documented. Starting in 1972, Carrier operated an unlined, 200-cubic-
foot wastewater lagoon for storage of TCE-contaminated paint sludges, which leaked from 1972
to 1980. In 1978, a filter cover failed on a vapor degreaser, spilling 2,000 to 5,000 gallons of
TCE. A third release occurred in 1985 when, following a period of heavy rainfall, an unknown
volume of TCE leaked from underground pipes. The company was able to recover 542 gallons of
TCE. As a result of this spill, wells were installed at the facility to monitor the Memphis Sands
Aquifer. The Carrier facility  is located within 2,000 feet of Water Plant Well #2 of the City of
Collierville. An estimated 12,800 people obtain drinking water from wells in the aquifer within 3
miles of the site.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal, State, and potentially
responsible parties' actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 06/24/88
  Final Date: 02/21/90
Threats and  Contaminants
         TCE was detected in several monitoring wells at the facility in 1986 from plant
         operations. Low levels of TCE were found in both wells at Water Plant #2 of the City
         of Collierville. Soil samples collected at the spill site by the State in 1986 contained
         TCE. Accidentally ingesting contaminated groundwater or soil may pose a health risk.
                                                                         March 1995

-------
 Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in two stages: immediate actions and a long-term remedial phase
focusing on cleanup of the entire site.
Response Action Status
            Immediate Actions: In 1980, Carrier removed wastes and soil from the lagoon
            and sent them to an EPA-regulated hazardous waste facility.  In 1990, Carrier and
            the Town of Collierville designed and installed an air stripping system at the Well
Field #2 treatment plant to remove TCE from raw water and allow the town to fully use Well
Field #2.

           Entire Site: In 1989, the parties potentially responsible for site contamination began
           a study of the  nature and extent of site contamination, along with an assessment of
           techniques for site cleanup. A treatability study was completed at the former lagoon
demonstrating that soil vapor extraction is effective  in cleaning up soil at one of the TCE
sources. A remedy was selected in late 1992 addressing site soils and groundwater through  the
use of soil vapor extraction and the continued use of the air stripping system described in the
immediate actions section.  These final cleanup activities are scheduled for completion in late
1995.

Site Facts: The  EPA and Carrier entered into an Administrative Order, requiring the potentially
responsible parties to conduct a study to determine the extent of the contamination and to evaluate
the technologies available for the cleanup.  Carrier was issued a Unilateral Administrative Order
in February 1992  to perform the design of and cleanup for the selected remedy.
Environmental Progress
The removal of wastes and soil, as well as the installation of an air stripping system, have
reduced risks to the public health and the environment at the Carrier Air Conditioning Company.
The groundwater air stripping system currently in place is effectively treating the groundwater.
Soil is being cleaned through the use of a  soil vapor extraction system.
Site Repository
Memphis Shelby County Public Library, 91 Walnut Street, Collierville, TN 38017
March 1995
CARRIER AIR CONDITIONING COMPANY

-------
CHEMET  CO.
TENNESSEE
EPA ID# TND98776
Site Description
                                     EPA REGION 4
                                         Fayette County
The Chemet Co. site is located approximately 1 mile east of the City of Moscow.  Three
buildings and two ponds make up the 5-acre site, which operated from 1978 to 1987 as an
antimony oxide plant.  The Tennessee Department of Health and Environment (TDHE) visited
the site in 1983 and 1989 and found drums containing antimony slag, two 15-gallon drums of
sulfuric acid, and several bags of soda ash.  TDHE also found the site to be easily accessible to
trespassers.  In 1990, the facility was secured with a 5 1/2 foot fence. A playground at the
LaGrange-Moscow Elementary School borders the eastern edge of the Chemet Co. site.  In 1992,
Chemet Co. constructed a fence around the areas of off-site contamination to prevent the 600
students and 65 workers at the elementary school from further contact with the soil.
Approximately 77 people reside within one mile of the site.
Site Responsibility:
The site is being addressed through
Federal, State, and potentially responsible
parties' actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 01/18/94
  Final Date: 05/31/94
Threats and Contaminants
         Samples collected from on-site ponds, drainage pathways, and the ball field of the
         adjacent school showed elevated levels of heavy metals including arsenic, antimony,
         and lead.  Although the facility and surrounding contaminated areas are fenced, making
         contact unlikely, touching or ingesting contaminated surface water or soils could pose a
         health threat.
Cleanup Approach
This site will be addressed through a long-term remedial phase focused on cleanup of the entire
site.
                                                                        September 1 994

-------
Response Action Status
           Initial Actions: In early 1990, TDHE constructed a 5 1/2 foot fence around the
           facility.  In addition, in mid-1990, TDHE removed approximately 300 tons of
           contaminated soil from an area north of Building No. 3 and stored and locked it  in
Building No. 2.  A second removal of soil occurred later in 1991. In mid-1992, Chemet Co.
installed a fence surrounding the area of off-site contamination,  preventing the 600 students and
65 workers at the school from further contact with the contaminants.
           Entire Site: The EPA and the State of Tennessee are planning a site-wide
           investigation to determine the nature and extent of contamination at the site.  This
           study will lead to the selection of final remedies to clean up the site.
Site Facts: On March 19, 1990, the TDHE signed an order requiring the construction of an 8
foot fence around the site and the removal and disposal of hazardous substances from the facility.
Environmental  Progress
Fencing the facility and off-site areas and removing contaminated soils has made the site safe
while studies leading to final cleanup remedies are being planned.
Site Repository
Not yet established.
September 1994
CHEMET CO.

-------
GALLAWA
TENNESSEE
EPA ID# TND980728992
Site Description
                                      EPA REGION 4
                                         Fayette County
                                   2 miles northeast of Gallaway

                                         Other Names:
                                         Gallaway Dump
The Gallaway Pits site is on a 10-acre parcel of land that was extensively mined for sand and
gravel, producing a landscape dotted with water-filled pits up to 50 feet deep. The site was used
for unlicensed dumping of municipal and industrial wastes. Disposal of hazardous materials at the
site occurred for an undetermined period of time, probably in the 1970s and 1980s. Wastes
included pesticides, residential/industrial solid waste, trash, and debris. Drums containing liquid
waste were drained and/or dumped in the  water-filled pits.  Approximately 50 homes  are located
within ]/2 mile of the site, with the closest home being 1,600 feet away. The majority of these
homes obtain drinking water from private wells.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal and State actions.
IMPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 12/30/82
  Final Date: 09/08/83
Threats  and Contaminants
          On-site surface water and soil were contaminated with pesticides, including chlordane
          and toxaphene, from unauthorized dumping activities. Off-site migration of
          contaminated surface water and soil posed a potential risk to local residents and the
          environment.
Cleanup Approach
This site was addressed in two stages: immediate actions and a long-term remedial phase focusing
on cleanup of the entire site.
Response Action Status
           Immediate Actions: The EPA set up a water treatment system in 1983 to treat
           water from the pits at the rate of 100 gallons per minute. Approximately 360,000
           gallons of water were treated, and 475 cubic yards (66 truckloads) of soil were
removed and disposed of.
                                                                            March 1995

-------
           Entire Site:  The EPA completed the following activities to clean up the site:
           contaminated soil and sediments were excavated from the pits and solidified; a cap
           was designed and constructed to place over the soil and sediments; monitoring wells
were installed to monitor the cap's integrity; and the contaminated pit-water was treated to meet
water quality standards and discharged to a nearby tributary.  The State of Tennessee applied for
a Cooperative Agreement and received additional funding to conduct restoration activities  at the
site.  Upon completion of this additional work, the State will take over operational and
maintenance responsibilities, scheduled for the summer of 1995.
Environmental Progress
The cleanup activities described above have been completed.  The State of Tennessee is
conducting restoration activities at the site.  The process for deleting the site from the NPL will
be pursued once these activities are completed and the State assumes operational and maintenance
responsibilities.
Site Repository
Gallaway City Hall, 607 Watson Drive, Gallaway, TN 38036
March 1995
                                                                            GALLAWAY PITS

-------
ICG  ISELIN   RAILR
TENNESSEE
EPA  ID# TND9877677
Site Description
                                      EPA REGION  4
                                         Madison County
                                            Jackson
The ICG Iselin Railroad Yard site is an 80-acre property located at the intersection of Eastern
Street and Magnolia Street in Jackson.  The facility has had several owners over the years, each
of whom used it for various purposes related to railroad operation. The Mobile and Ohio
Railroad Co. operated the facility as a railroad station and maintenance depot from 1906 until
1940, when Gulf Mobile and Ohio Railroad Company purchased Mobile and Ohio Railroad Co.
Gulf Mobile continued to use the facility as a railyard.  In  1972, Gulf Mobile reorganized as the
Illinois Central Gulf Railroad Co. (ICG).  ICG used the site as a locomotive maintenance facility
from 1972 until 1986, when the Williams Steel Co. purchased much of the property.  Norfolk
Southern Railway Co. owns the remainder of the property, which is not currently considered to
be part of the ICG Iselin Railroad Yard site.  Williams Steel Co. used its portion  of the property
as a steel fabrication facility from 1986  until 1989, when Iselin Properties, Inc. assumed
ownership. ICG currently owns the site, and waste disposal practices at the site are unknown
prior to ICG's operation of the facility.  At one time, the facility may have included a round
house, a steam locomotive fueling station, a coal-fired power  plant, and a locomotive
maintenance building.  Currently, the site has several contaminated units:  a main warehouse;
numerous  railroad tracks; storage tanks; a battery waste disposal pile; a rail car fueling platform
under an open-air shed; and the railyard's pollution control system, which includes a
neutralization tank, a concrete tank,  several drainage ditches,  and a surface impoundment.  The
EPA required ICG to construct  the pollution control system as a requirement of the temporary
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit it approved for the facility in
1973.  This permit allowed ICG to discharge limited quantities of waste into the Jones Creek at
intervals that would  not harm the surrounding community or the environment.  However, ICG
exceeded the limits set by the NPDES permit in 1975 and again in 1980, when it  reported that  it
had released large quantities of  heavy metals into  the creek. In 1990, the Tennessee Department
of Health and Environment sampled surface soils  at the site and found them to be contaminated
with heavy metals.   The EPA conducted subsequent studies of the surface soils, as well as  on-site
sediments, in 1991.  The EPA confirmed that these media were contaminated with heavy metals,
in addition to volatile organic compounds (VOCs) such as vinyl chloride and benzene.  The site
is located  in a suburban, residential area.  About 31,000 people use ten municipal wells within 4
miles of the  site.
Site Responsibility:
The site is being addressed through
Federal and State actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 05/10/93
                                                                              March 1995

-------
Threats and  Contaminants
         The soil is contaminated with heavy metals, primarily chromium, copper, and lead, as
         well as VOCs. Sediments at the site are contaminated with VOCs, including vinyl
         chloride, tetrachloroethene, and benzene.  People who touch or ingest contaminated
         sediments or soil may be at risk.
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in a long-term remedial phase focusing on the cleanup of the entire
site.

Response Action Status 	
          Entire Site: The EPA initiated a full-scale investigation into the nature and extent of
          contamination at the site in the summer of 1994. The investigation is scheduled for
          completion in 1996 and will identify alternatives for cleanup at the site.
Environmental Progress
The EPA has determined that this site poses no immediate threat to the public or the environment
while site studies are ongoing.
March 1995                                 2                         ICG ISELIN RAILROAD

-------
LEWISBURG
TENNESSEE
EPA ID#TND98072911
                                      PA REGION  4
                                        Marshall County
                                   1/2 mile north of Lewisburg
Site Description
The 20-acre Lewisburg Dump operated as a municipal dump for 20 to 25 years. The site includes
a 4-acre landfill and a 2-acre quarry pond.  A State-sponsored geological survey found the site
unfit for use as a sanitary landfill, and it was closed in 1979.  The dump accepted mostly
municipal waste and some industrial waste, such as inorganic chemicals and solvents. Waste
partially filled a former limestone quarry that contains a shallow lagoon fed by groundwater.
Runoff from the site eventually discharges into Big Rock Creek. The dump lies in a remote area;
approximately 30 people  reside in the nearest homes to the site, which are about 1/2 mile away.
Private wells are located  within  1/4 mile from the site.
Site Responsibility:
This site was addressed through
Federal and potentially responsible
parties' actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 12/30/82
  Final Date: 09/08/83
Threats  and Contaminants
          The soil, leachate, and surface water are contaminated with a plastic called Bis-
          2Ethylhexyl phthalate (DEHP),  heavy metals including copper, and volatile organic
          compounds from the site's dump activities. Pond sediments on site are similarly
          contaminated, but at much lower levels.  One on-site well was contaminated with low
          levels of DEHP.  Direct contact with or accidental ingestion of contaminated
          groundwater,  surface water, or soil may be a risk.
                                                                          March 1995

-------
 Cleanup Approach
 Response Action Status
           Entire Site: In 1987, under EPA orders, several potentially responsible parties began
           an intensive study of the site's pollution problems. The first phase of this investigation
           explored the nature and extent of site contamination; the second prescribed the best
alternatives for final cleanup. The final draft of the study was reviewed by the EPA, the State of
Tennessee, and the U.S. Geologic Survey (USGS).  The selected  remedy included regrading the
cap and clearing the site of vegetation and industrial debris to prevent further infiltration. The
design of the remedy began in  1991 and was completed in late 1992.  Cleanup of the  dump began
in late 1992,  and was completed in late 1993. The investigation indicated that the groundwater
was contaminated at very low levels.  Monitoring and testing of the groundwater was performed
during the design of the cleanup remedies and continued through the completion of the cleanup.
Long-term groundwater monitoring, begun in the fall of 1993, will be performed for up to 5
years if required, as part of the operation and maintenance phase. The site is planned  for deletion
from the NPL if the remedy  is shown to continue to be effective.

Site Facts:  The EPA signed a Consent Order with several potentially responsible parties to
perform the study characterizing the contamination at the site. The parties agreed to pay the full
costs of the selected cleanup  actions.
Environmental Progress
Construction of the all site remedies has been completed at the Lewisburg Dump site. Once final
sampling and monitoring of the lagoon has been completed, scheduled in 1995, and the
effectiveness of the remedies in meeting cleanup goals is confirmed, the site will be deleted from
the NPL.
Site Repository
Marshall County Memorial Library, 310 Farmington Pike,  Lewisburg, TN 37091
March 1995
                                                                         LEWISBURG DUMP

-------
MALLORY  C
COMPANY
TENNESSEE
EPA ID# TND075453688
                                       PA REGION 4
                                         Wayne County
                                          Waynesboro
Site Description
Electrical capacitors were manufactured on the SVi-acre Mallory Capacitor site from 1969 to
1984. The operators first used polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) as the dielectric fluid in the
capacitors, switching to a plastics chemical in 1978. The factory changed hands when Dart
Industries purchased it in  1979. Dart later sold the property in 1980 to Emhart Industries, Inc. As
part of the sales agreement with Emhart, certain PCB wastes, a buried tank, and contaminated
soil were removed from the site and sent to an approved PCB disposal facility. The plant
continued to operate, but voluntarily closed in 1984 when PCBs were discovered throughout the
site. The EPA found that PCBs entered the environment through spills, leaks, and intentional
discharges. The plant is located in a small community.  Approximately 900 people get drinking
water from wells and springs within 3 miles of the site. The site is in the flood plain of the Green
River. Surface water within 3 miles of the site  is used for fishing and swimming.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal and potentially responsible
parties' actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 01/22/87
  Final Date: 10/04/89
Threats  and Contaminants
          PCBs and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) have been detected in groundwater.
          Off-site wells are contaminated with PCBs and volatile organic compounds (VOCs)
          such as trichloroethylene (TCE) and dichloroethylene. Coming in contact with or
          accidentally ingesting contaminated groundwater could pose a human health threat.
          The presence of PCBs and VOCs poses a threat to the environment, as they are toxic
          to aquatic wildlife.
                                                                           March 1995

-------
Cleanup  Approach
This site is being addressed in two stages: immediate actions and a long-term remedial phase
focusing on cleanup of the entire site.
Response Action Status
           Immediate Actions: From 1988 to 1989, before the start of the field work on the
           site study, a potentially responsible party removed approximately 20,100 tons of
           PCB-contaminated soil and 3,400 cubic yards of plant debris and sent them to an
EPA-approved disposal facility.

          Entire Site: In 1989, the potentially responsible party installed several monitoring
          wells on and off site to better define the extent of the contamination. Under EPA
          orders and supervision, the potentially responsible party conducted an intensive
investigation of the site contamination. The study focused on the extent of PCB and VOC
contamination and assessed the possible toxicological effects to Cold Water Creek.  In 1991, the
EPA selected a remedy which involves on- and off-site hydraulic containment of the contaminated
groundwater plume with extraction and treatment. In 1993, engineering designs for groundwater
cleanup were completed. Groundwater extraction and treatment began in late 1993, and is
scheduled for completion in 1996.

Site Facts: The potentially responsible parties, working with the EPA under an Administrative
Order, completed a study of the nature and extent of the contamination and identified possible
cleanup solutions. The cleanup design and  activities are  being performed by the potentially
responsible parties under a Unilateral Administrative Order.
Environmental  Progress
The removal of contaminated soil and debris has reduced the potential for exposure to
contamination at the Mallory Capacitor Company site while extraction and treatment of the
groundwater are taking place.
Site Repository
Wayne County Public Library, U.S. Highway 64, East Waynesboro, TN 38485
March 1995                                  2                MALLORY CAPACITOR COMPANY

-------
MEMPHIS   D
DEPOT
TENNESSEE
EPA ID# TN4210020570
Site Description
                                             REGION 4
                                          Shelby County
                                             Memphis
The Memphis Defense Depot site comprises 642 acres in a mixed residential/commercial/
industrial area of south-central Memphis. The site consists of two adjacent sections: Dunn Field,
an open storage and burial area of about 60 acres, and the main installation. The Depot, which is
a major field installation of the Defense Logistics Agency, has been in operation since 1942. Its
primary function is to provide material support, including clothing, food, medical supplies,
electronic equipment, petroleum products, and industrial chemicals,  to all U.S. military services,
as well as some civilian agencies. To fulfill this function, the Depot has conducted numerous
operations dealing with hazardous substances. A total of 75 waste disposal areas have been
identified. According to the Department of Defense (DOD), among the wastes disposed of at the
site are oil,  grease, paint thinners, methyl bromide, and pesticides. In addition, stored materials
have reportedly spilled and leaked at the main installation as well as at Dunn Field, contaminating
the soil with volatile organic compounds (VOCs), metals, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs),
organics, and pesticides. An estimated 154,300 people obtain their drinking water from public
and private  wells located within 4 miles of the site. The nearest well, which is located within ¥2
mile of hazardous substances at the Depot, also provides water for commercial food production.
These wells draw from deep ground water, which is not currently contaminated. Until 1986, when
the DOD found pesticides and PCBs in lake sediments and fish tissues, Lake Danielson was used
for recreational  fishing.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal actions.
 NPL Listing History
Proposed Date: 02/07/92
 Final Date: 10/14/92
Threats and  Contaminants
          Shallow groundwater is contaminated with the heavy metals arsenic, lead, chromium,
          and nickel, and the VOCs tetrachloroethane (PCE) and tricloroethene (TCE). Soil is
          contaminated with various VOCs, metals, PCBs, organics such as polynuclear
          aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and pesticides. The lake sediments are contaminated
          with the heavy metals cadmium, chromium, lead, and zinc. Fish in Lake Danielson
          are contaminated with pesticides and PCBs. Accidentally touching or ingesting
          contaminated groundwater, soils, surface water, or fish could pose a health threat.
          The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) is developing a
          preliminary health assessment to characterize  these threats.
                                                                              March 1995

-------
Cleanup  Approach
This site is being addressed in four long-term phases addressing cleanup of the Dunn Field area,
Southwest Quadrant and Main Installation area, the Southwest Watershed and Golf area, and the
North Central area.
Response Action Status
          Dunn Field Area: In 1994, during an investigation of the Dunn Field Area, a
          groundwater plume was identified beneath the area. Further investigations will be
          conducted to identify the nature and extent of the groundwater contamination. These
investigations are expected to be completed in 1996.  The proposed remedy for the groundwater
plume is a pump and treat system, and if necessary, discharge of treated water into the city water
system. The remedy is expected to be finalized in 1996.

          Southwest Quadrant and Main Installation Area: An investigation into the
          nature and extent of contamination in this area is underway and is scheduled to be
          completed in mid-1998, at which time, an appropriate remedy will be chosen.

          Southwest Watershed and Golf Course Area: An investigation into the nature
          and extent of contamination in this area is underway and is scheduled to be completed
          in mid-1998, at which time, an appropriate remedy will  be chosen.

          North Central Area: An investigation into the nature and extent of contamination in
          this area is underway and is scheduled to  be completed in mid-1998, at which time,
          an appropriate remedy will be chosen.

Site Facts: The Memphis Defense Depot is participating in the Installation  Restoration
Program, a specially funded program established by the DOD in 1978 to  identify, investigate,
and control the migration of hazardous contaminants  at military and other DOD facilities.
In early 1995, the EPA, the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation, and the
Memphis Defense Depot signed a Federal Facilities Agreement (FFA), establishing a schedule
for cleaning  up site contamination.
Environmental  Progress
Initial investigations indicate that the Memphis Defense Depot site does not pose an immediate
threat to the health and safety of the nearby population while further studies are being conducted
and actions to prevent the migration of the groundwater plume are being evaluated.
March 1995                                  2                      MEMPHIS DEFENSE DEPOT

-------
Site Repository
Memphis/Shelby County Public Library, Main Branch, Government and Law Section,
1850 Peabody Avenue, Memphis, Tennessee 38104-4021 - Government and Law Section
(901) 725-8877

Memphis/Shelby County Public Health Department, Pollution Control Division,
814 Jefferson Avenue, Memphis, Tennessee 38106 - (901) 576-7741

Cherokee Public Library, 3300 Sharp Avenue, Memphis, Tennessee 38111-3758 -
(901) 743-3655
MEMPHIS DEFENSE DEPOT                     3                                March 1995

-------
IVII L MIM  ........ /xJglO-H^iN^^                 and Gibson Counties
A M M U N ITIO fjf^^^^^^^^  8 miles from the town of Milan

PLANT
TENNESSEE
EPA  ID#TN0210020582
Site Description
The Milan Army Ammunition Plant site comprises 22,540 acres and is located in a rural area.
The plant currently produces munitions for the Army and is operated by Martin Marietta
Ordnance Systems, Inc. The "O"-Line, a conventional munitions demilitarization facility at
Milan, has operated since 1942. The major mission of the "O"-Line is to remove trinitrotoluene
(TNT) and other explosives from munitions by injecting a high-pressure stream of hot water and
steam into the open cavity of the munitions. The resulting wastewater from these operations
subsequently was discharged into 11 unlined settling ponds.  Approximately 9,000 people live in
the town of Milan, located 5 miles  from the facility and 8 miles from the NPL site. The nearest
off-site residence is located approximately 1 mile from the contaminated area. There are 1,400
employees of Martin Marietta, the current operator,  working at the site.  Three water supply wells
serve  the residents of Milan. Some private wells are located less than 3 miles from the area of
known groundwater contamination. More than 13,000 people within 5 miles of the facility depend
on groundwater as a source of drinking water.
Site Responsibility:  The site is being addressed through
                      Federal actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
 Proposed Date: 10/15/84
  Final Date: 07/22/87
Threats and  Contaminants
          On- and off-site groundwater, surface water, soils, and sediments are contaminated
          with explosives and heavy metals including cadmium, mercury, and lead; volatile
          organic compounds (VOCs) such as chloroform, benzene, and methylene chloride;
          and nitrates and nitrites. Area residents may be subject to exposure to contaminants
          when drinking or coming into direct contact with polluted groundwater. Site-related
          contaminants have been detected in off-site surface water used for the watering of
          livestock, irrigation, and recreational purposes, and in the groundwater which is the
          source of public drinking water. Area residents could be exposed to contaminants in
          the surface water or by eating fish, crops, and locally raised meat and dairy products
          that contain bioaccumulated contaminants.
                                                                              March 1995

-------
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in three stages: initial actions and three long-term remedial phases
directed at cleanup of the "O"-Line Ponds Area, Northern Area, and remaining areas of
contamination.

Response Action Status  	
           Initial Actions: The Army had the unlined settling ponds dredged in 1971, and the
           soils were placed near the side of the ponds. Areas of surface soils suspected to be
           contaminated with the remnants of explosives were removed, and a multi-layer cover
was placed on top of the ponds and the dredged soils in 1984. Wells to monitor the migration of
site-related contaminants into the groundwater have been installed, and more wells will be
installed. Activities associated with post-closure, such as maintenance of the grounds and fences,
are underway. Regular sampling and analysis continues to monitor groundwater contamination of
existing wells. In addition, soils throughout the facility contaminated with lead based paint from
water towers were removed and disposed of at a treatment and disposal facility.

           "O"-Line Ponds Area: The EPA reviewed the initial actions at the "O"-Line Ponds
           Area in 1987 to determine whether they are comparable to EPA guidelines for
           investigating the most effective  ways  to clean up the site, and to ensure that they
comply with the National Contingency Plan, the  Federal regulations by which  Superfund cleanup
actions are conducted. An investigation of remedies started  in 1990 at the "O"-Line Ponds Area
and 10 other  Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Solid Waste Management Units.
An interim cleanup remedy was selected that entails pumping and treating the groundwater plume
in the "O"-Line Ponds. Cleanup activities have begun for the groundwater.  A final remedy for
the "O"-Line Ponds soil was selected, and  a capping system will be constructed to prevent
explosive-contaminated soil remaining in the ponds from leaching into the groundwater.

           Northern Area: An interim investigation of the entire facility was completed in
           1991. Further investigations of  the ditches in the northern area and affected
           groundwater, believed to be associated with traces of explosive compounds found in
the city of Milan and private wells, were begun  in 1992. An interim remedy has been selected by
the Army for the Northern Boundary groundwater. The remedy is a pump and treat system
designed to contain the plume.

           Remaining Areas:  Investigations are being performed at all remaining areas of the
           site to determine  if further cleanup actions are needed.
 March 1995                                  2               MILAN ARMY AMMUNITION PLANT

-------
Site Facts: Milan Army Ammunition Plant is participating in the Installation Restoration
Program, a specially funded program established by the Department of Defense (DOD) in 1978
to identify, investigate, and control the migration of hazardous contaminants at military and other
DOD facilities. The Army conducted a survey of area residents in 1988 to determine if they were
concerned about potential health risks posed by the site. The results indicated a high degree of
public interest and moderate concern for potential risks. The Milan Army Ammunition Plant has
established a committee to review technical aspects of the site cleanup.  This group includes
private citizens from the community  and local government. Several public meetings have been
held to keep the community informed of the status of the site. A "Contingency Plan" was
implemented to begin replacement of city wells. The Army provided the City of Milan with the
funds to implement the plan.
Environmental Progress
The covering of the "O"-Line Ponds and excavation of contaminated soils have made the site
safer while further investigations continue at the Milan Army Ammunition Plant site.
Site Repository
Mildred G. Fields Library, 1075A East Van Hook Street, Milan, Tennessee 38358

Chief Engineer's Office, Milan AAP, Milan, Tennessee 38358
MILAN ARMY AMMUNITION PLANT
March 1995

-------
MURRAY-OH
TENNESSEE
EPA ID# TND980728836
                                     EPA  REGION 4
                                       Lawrence County
                                        Lawrenceburg

                                        Other Names:
                                      Murray Ohio Site #2
Site Description
The 27-acre Murray-Ohio industrial dump accepted paint and electroplating sludges from 1963
until 1982. Wastes are buried on about 6 acres, and there is another 1/4-acre disposal area
located 1,000 feet away from the site. Seeps containing heavy metal contamination have been
observed along drainageways. Groundwater under the site and a tributary of Shoal Creek are
thought to be contaminated with chromium. Shoal Creek is approximately a mile from the site.
The main site was capped, revegetated, and is periodically maintained. Approximately 2,600
people live within 3 miles of the site. The closest residence is about 1/3 mile away. Public and
private water supply wells lie within a 3-mile radius.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal and potentially responsible
parties' actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 12/30/82
  Final Date: 09/08/83
Threats and Contaminants
          On-site groundwater and soil are believed to contain contamination from heavy metals
          including chromium, nickel, and zinc, as well as volatile organic compounds (VOCs).
          Human health threats could arise from exposure to hazardous substances in
          contaminated groundwater and soil.
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in two stages: immediate actions and a long-term remedial phase
focusing on soil and groundwater cleanup at the site.
                                                                          March 1995

-------
 Response Action Status
            Immediate Actions: Murray-Ohio Manufacturing capped and vegetated the site in
            1981.
           Soil and Groundwater: Under EPA supervision, Murray-Ohio Manufacturing
           began an intensive study of soil and groundwater pollution at the site in 1990. The
           investigation explored the nature and extent of contamination and evaluated cleanup
 alternatives. A remedy was chosen in the summer of 1994 that consists  of repairing various areas
 of the cap, institutional controls, and deed restrictions.

 Site Facts: A Consent Order was agreed to in 1990, which required Murray-Ohio
 Manufacturing to complete the study of the contamination at the site.
 Environmental  Progress
The immediate action to cap the site reduced the potential for exposure at the Murray-Ohio Dump
and helped to minimize the migration of contaminants while final cleanup activities are being
planned.
Site Repository
Lawrenceburg Public Library, 519 East Games Road, Lawrenceburg, TN 38464
March 1995
                                                                     MURRAY-OHIO DUMP

-------
NORTH  HOL
DUMP
TENNESSEE
EPA  ID# TND980558894
                                       PA REGION 4
                                         Shelby County
                                         North Memphis
                                          Other Names:
                                        Hollywood Dump
                                      Memphis Public Works/
                                        Hollywood Dump
Site Description
The 70-acre North Hollywood Dump site was used as a municipal dump from the  1930s until the
City closed it in 1967. However, some dumping of non-chemical refuse probably continued until
1980.  In the late 1940s, the Hayden Chemical Company used the dump to dispose of wastes
generated in the production of sodium hydrochloride. Hayden later was bought out by Velsicol
Chemical Corporation, which continued the practice of dumping at the site. At one time,
pesticide-contaminated sludge from a closed sewer line leading to the Velsicol plant was removed
and buried in a small area known as the  "Endrin Pit." The dump was also used for the disposal
of other industrial wastes  from plants in the Memphis area. In the 1960s, Buckeye Cellulose in
Memphis sent copper-contaminated material to the dump for disposal.  In 1980, the EPA found
pesticides and heavy metals in surface soil, groundwater, and pond sediments on the dump.
Because of high community concern in the  early 1980s, the State of Tennessee recommended this
site as the State's highest  priority hazardous waste site. Approximately 10,000 people live within
3 miles of the dump site.  An elementary  school is situated close to the dump.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal, State, and potentially
responsible parties' actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 10/23/81
  Final Date: 09/08/83
Threats  and Contaminants
          The groundwater and surface water ponds are contaminated with pesticides including
          chlordane and endrin. The soil is contaminated with pesticides and heavy metals
          including lead, copper, and arsenic. Accidentally drinking or otherwise coming into
          contact with contaminated groundwater or soil could adversely affect the health of
          people. Also, people may be exposed to contaminants that may have entered the food
          chain through contaminated fish caught in ponds on or near the dump.
                                                                            March 1995

-------
Cleanup  Approach  	

This site is being addressed in two stages: emergency actions and a long-term remedial phase
focusing on cleanup of the entire site.
Response Action Status
           Emergency Actions: In 1980, the EPA took an emergency action to slow the
           movement of contaminants from the site.  Also, the EPA installed a chain-link fence
           around the site and began a program to monitor the on-site wastes.  In  1981, a
technical assistance group made up of representatives  from the State, the City of Memphis,
Shelby County, local industry, and the EPA, removed some of the chemical wastes from the
surface.

           Entire Site: In 1982, the EPA assumed the lead role from the State to complete
           investigations into the extent and nature of contamination at the North  Hollywood
           Dump site.  The potentially responsible parties took over in 1984. The  study,
completed in 1990, recommended retrofitting the landfill to meet legal sanitation standards.  The
selected remedy includes: placement of a 2-foot clay cap, grading, and revegetation; drainage of
an adjacent 40-acre pond known to hold contaminated sediments; installation of a 3-foot cover
over the contaminated sediments; and the removal of fish found to be contaminated, followed by
re-stocking of the pond.  Groundwater  will be monitored to ensure contamination levels remain
low. In addition, the site will be fenced and restrictions on future use of the site will be put in
place. The engineering design of the remedy and was  completed  in late 1993.  Cleanup activities
began in early  1994 and the capping and grading of the landfill and the drum removal is expected
to be completed in  1995. Work on the contaminated sediments is expected to start in  1995  and
be completed in 1996.

Site Facts: The State of Tennessee ordered the potentially responsible parties to investigate the
site under State monitoring, which was agreed to in 1984. In late 1988, the EPA replaced the
State in the monitoring role.  In early  1991, two potentially responsible parties entered into a
Consent Decree with the EPA to perform design and cleanup activities at the site.
Environmental  Progress
The emergency actions to remove chemical wastes have reduced the potential for exposure to
contaminated materials while final cleanup activities are being conducted at the site.
Site Repository
Memphis-Shelby County Public Library,  1850 Peabody Avenue, Memphis, TN 38104
March 1995                                  2                    NORTH HOLLYWOOD DUMP

-------
 OAK  RIDGEm* REGION 4
                                       ^                       Anderson County
 /1 IQ PI f\ C1              \        S                      Other Names:
 lUOUUtJ               \0 ^^                    USDOE Oak Ridge
 TENNESSEE
 EPA ID# TN1890090003
Site Description
The Oak Ridge Reservation site, a U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) facility, covers 37,000
acres and includes 294 on-site contaminated areas and off-site surface waters including Poplar
Creek, the Clinch River and Lower Watts Bar Reservoir of the Tennessee River.  The site
consists of three industrial facilities: the Oak Ridge National Laboratory or X-10, a research
facility that includes nuclear reactors and ongoing energy, chemical and biological programs; the
K-25 Plant, a former production facility that enriched uranium-235 by gaseous diffusion; and the
Y-12 Plant,a production facility that formerly enriched uranium-235 by an electromagnetic
process, and currently produces nuclear weapon components, processes nuclear materials, and
performs other functions that relate to energy and national defense programs.  Site operations
generate a variety of radioactive, non-radioactive and mixed (radioactive and non-radioactive)
hazardous wastes, most of which are containerized and buried below ground or stored in
buildings on site.  Leakage from buried waste areas and former processing facilities has
contaminated on site and off-site soils, surface water and sediments, and groundwater. Site
related contaminants above levels of concern can be found in sediment, water,  and biota of
Poplar  Creek.  The State of Tennessee has advised against consuming fish and coming into
contact with water from Poplar Creek, which flows to the Clinch River and ultimately to the
Tennessee River.  An estimated 43,200 people obtain water from surface water intakes on the
Tennessee River along a  118-mile stretch downstream from the site.
Site Responsibility:  This site is being addressed through
                      Federal actions.
                                                                Final Date: 11/21/89
                                                                              March 1995

-------
Threats and Contaminants
          Heavy metals, organic compounds, and radionuclides have been detected in on-site
          groundwater, surface water and soil.  Cesium-137 has been detected in channel
          sediments approximately 23 miles downstream from the site boundary.  Mercury has
          been detected in flood plain sediments of East Fork Poplar Creek and Poplar Creek.
          The groundwater and soil at the South Campus Facility are contaminated with
          trichloroethylene. The groundwater at the Bear Creek area is contaminated with
          volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and nitrates. East Fork Poplar Creek flows
          through populated areas within the City of Oak Ridge.  Exposure to site-related
          contamination by people or plants and wildlife (aquatic and terrestrial) could cause
          adverse health and ecological effects directly or indirectly through the food chain.
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in numerous stages focusing on cleanup of each contaminated area.
Response Action Status
           East Fork Poplar Creek (Lower Reach): This area includes the East Fork Poplar
           Creek, which begins immediately downstream of the Y-12 Plant and extends to its
           mouth at Poplar Creek.  Investigations into the nature and extent of contamination
concluded that mercury contamination in the flood plain sediments poses a risk.  Currently,
cleanup alternatives are being evaluated to determine the best approach for  addressing the
contaminated sediments. A decision is expected by  late 1995 on the final remedies to clean up
the mercury contamination. More than 1 million cubic feet of contaminated sediments could be
removed from the floodplain, affecting a total area of 27 acres.

           Poplar Creek:  This area includes Poplar Creek from the mouth of East Fork
           Poplar Creek to  the mouth of Poplar Creek at Clinch River.  Poplar Creek has
           received contaminants directly from the  K-25 Plant and indirectly from the Y-12
Plant from the East Fork Poplar Creek.  The lower  reach of Poplar Creek, which experiences
periodic backflow as a result of discharges from Melton Hill Dam, has received contamination
from the X-10 laboratory.  The contaminants in Poplar Creek include a variety of radionuclides,
metals, and organic compounds that are found in the sediment, water, and biota.  Currently, the
State of Tennessee has advised against consuming fish and making direct contact with the water
in Poplar Creek.  Before cleanup of Poplar Creek can be  addressed, the cleanup and control of
upstream on- and off-site sources of contamination will be conducted.  However, if necessary,
early cleanup actions may  be taken to reduce localized high levels of contamination  in Poplar
Creek prior to selecting  the final source cleanup and control remedies.  Investigations of the area
are underway.
March 1995                                   2               OAK RIDGE RESERVATION (USDOE)

-------
           Clinch River: This area includes Melton Hill Reservoir and the Clinch River from
           Melton Hill Dam to the mouth of the Clinch River within Watts Bar Reservoir near
           Kingston, Tennessee.  All Oak Ridge Reservation on-site surface water flows into the
Clinch River located downstream from the site.  Since Cesium-137 and Cobalt-60 sediment
contamination is buried beneath approximately 2 feet of mostly uncontaminated sediment cover,
the preliminary cleanup strategy consists of continued monitoring and institutional controls that
will restrict dredging of contaminated sediments. The State of Tennessee has advised against
consuming fish from the Clinch River arm of the Watts Bar Reservoir. Investigations to
determine the final cleanup strategy for the Clinch River are scheduled for completion in 1997.

           Watts Bar Reservoir (Lower Reach):  This area consists of the lower reach of
           the Watts Bar Reservoir from the mouth of the Clinch River at Kingston, Tennessee,
           downstream to the Watts Bar Dam.   Surface waters from both the Tennessee and
Clinch Rivers flow into the reservoir; however,  the  Clinch River is the source of site-related
contaminants. Non-site related contaminants enter Watts Bar Reservoir via the Tennessee River.
Because Watts Bar Dam was completed prior to the  start of site operations and the reservoir acts
as an efficient trap for sediments and any associated particle-reactive contaminants,  the site-
related contaminants that have migrated off site  have accumulated in the bottom of Watts Bar
Reservoir.  Due to such accumulation, field investigations indicate that existing concentrations of
site-related contaminants downstream of Watts Bar Dam do not exceed standards established for
human health and ecological protection. The low concentration level and widespread nature of
Watts Bar Reservoir contamination has led to the selection of a preliminary cleanup strategy for
this area that will prevent exposure to risk.  Activities include sediment dredging restrictions
administered  by the Tennessee Valley Authority and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and
maintaining existing fish consumption advisories issued by the State of Tennessee.   Investigations
leading to the selection of a final cleanup remedy are scheduled for completion in 1995.

           South Campus Facility: The South  Campus Facility is located  on the extreme
           eastern end of the Oak Ridge Reservation, off of Scarboro Road.  The  South Campus
           Facility conducted animal research on the fate and  metabolism of radionuclides.
Investigations at this site show that there is a relatively small zone of soil and groundwater
contaminated with the VOC trichloroethylene.  The  remedy for this area is scheduled to be
selected in 1996.

           UNC Landfill: The UNC Landfill  is a 1-acre low-level radioactive landfill, located
           at the Y-12 plant.  The selected remedies included construction of a multi-layer
           closure cover and long-term monitoring. The cleanup was completed in 1993.
Currently,  long-term operation and maintenance  activities are being conducted at the site,
including monitoring groundwater wells, maintaining the cap,  and conducting 5-year reviews of
the site.

           Mercury Tank Remediation:  In 1991, a remedy was selected which provided for
           the removal of sediments contaminated with mercury from process tanks to prevent
           their migration through the surface  water runoff.  Cleanup activities were completed
in late  1993.
OAK RIDGE RESERVATION  (USDOE)
                                                                                 March 1995

-------
            East Fork Poplar Creek (Upper Reach): This area receives contamination
            through groundwater and surface water releases from the Y-12 Plant.  The
            preliminary cleanup strategy includes source control actions to minimize future
releases to the creek.  Currently, releases of mercury contamination to  East Fork Poplar Creek
are being  addressed through an action to reduce mercury concentrations in plant effluent as
required by  a 1994 National Pollutant Discharge Emissions System (NPDES) permit issued by
the State of  Tennessee under its Clean Water Act authority.  The permit has established a
compliance schedule of 7 years.  At the end of this compliance schedule, releases from the Y-12
Plant must comply with Clean Water Act standards. Further investigations are being conducted
to determine a final cleanup remedy.

            Bear Creek:  The Bear Creek area includes the S-3 Ponds, Sanitary Landfill I,
            Boneyard/Burnyard, Oil Landfarms, and the Bear Creek Burial Grounds.  In
            addition, the  area also includes groundwater and surface water contamination within
Bear Creek Valley.  A treatability study is scheduled for completion in 1995, which will
determine the feasibility of using certain technologies to clean up groundwater contaminated with
VOCs and nitrates.  Investigations leading to the selection of a final cleanup remedy are expected
to be completed in 1996.
           Rust Spoils Areas, Spoil Area 1, and SY-200 Yard:  These areas of Bear
           Creek are contaminated with mercury, other metals, radionuclides, and organic
           compounds.  Investigations leading to the selection of a final cleanup remedy are
           Chestnut Ridge:  This area consists of the Filled Coal Ash Pond and associated
           contamination released to surface water, creek sediments of McCoy Branch, and
           groundwater.  Contaminants include metals and uranium.  Investigations leading to
the selection of a final cleanup remedy are scheduled for completion in 1995.
           Y-12 Plant Study Areas:  The Y-12 Plant Study Areas consist of 57 potentially
           contaminated areas that require investigations to determine the nature and extent of
           contamination.  Studies of these areas, in conjunction with studies of the Upper
Reach of East Fork Poplar Creek, are being conducted to determine appropriate cleanup
activities.

           Drum Storage Yard:  This area consists of 77,814 drums containing stabilized and
           raw sludge mixed with low-level hazardous and radioactive contamination removed
           from the K-1407-B Ponds and K-1407-C Retention Basin.  Due to waste  stabilization
failure and drum deterioration caused by weather exposure, drummed waste posed a threat to the
environment.  The cleanup remedy selected consists of overpacking the drummed waste, treating
raw sludges and placing the treated materials into containers; temporarily storing containerized
material inside the K-25 permitted storage facilities; and transporting the material to a permitted
mixed waste facility located in Utah for final disposal. Cleanup  activities have begun and are
scheduled for completion in late 1995.  The overpacked waste is expected to be placed in the K-
25 facility in the spring of 1995.
March 1995                                   4               OAK RIDGE RESERVATION (USDOE)

-------
           K-1407-B  Holding Pond and K-1407-C Retention Basin: From 1987 to
           1989, sludges from these waste impoundments were removed, stabilized and placed
           into drums.  Residual radioactive contamination remained after sludge removal was
completed. In the fall of 1993, a remedy was selected that called for controlling the source of
contamination by  installing a cap.  The cleanup activities are ongoing and are expected to be
completed in  late  1996.

           K-901  and K-1070 Areas:  These areas include the K-901-A Holding Pond and
           K-1070-A Old Contamination Burial Ground.  Contaminants include metals,
           radionuclides and organic compounds.  Investigations leading to the selection of a
final cleanup  remedy are scheduled for completion in late 1997.

           SW-31 Spring:  Cleanup activities  for this area were divided into phases.  Phase I
           provided for the collection and treatment of spring water contaminated with VOCs.
           This cleanup action was necessary to  prevent contaminant migration from the surface
water. Phase I is complete and currently  in the operation and maintenance stage.  Phase II
provides for upgrading the K-25 Plant waste treatment facility to operate more efficiently and
cost-effectively.  This phase is scheduled for completion in 1996.

           K-1070-C  and K-1070-D  Burial  Grounds:  This areas encompasses a 22-acre
           classified burial ground used from the 1970s until 1989.  Radioactive-contaminated
           equipment was  buried in three large trenches and VOC-contaminated liquid was
disposed of in open pits. These burial grounds contribute to the contamination at the SW-31
Spring.  Field investigations indicate  that  soil and groundwater in the area of the former pits
contain significant VOC contamination. Investigations leading to the selection of a final cleanup
remedy are scheduled for completion in late 1997.

           K-25 Plant Study Areas:  Ongoing investigations  into the nature and extent of
           contamination at 35 separate areas will determine the  most appropriate cleanup
           remedies.

           Waste Area Group (WAG)  11:   WAG 11 consists of an area that was used as a
           scrap yard by the facilities at the Oak Ridge Reservation.  An interim cleanup action
           began in 1993 to remove the  contaminated surface debris, which minimized  the
potential for  further contamination and to allowed for further investigations into the nature and
extent of surface  and subsurface contamination.   Radioactive-contaminated debris was
containerized and transferred for storage in underground silos at WAG 6.  Other hazardous
materials, including compressed gas cylinders, were transferred to permitted waste handling
facilities for  proper handling and disposal.  Interim cleanup activities were completed in the fall
of 1994.

           WAG  1  Surface Impoundments:  This area is the main industrial complex of the
           X-10 Plant.  The surface impoundments were used as part of the wastewater system
           that handled radioactive liquid wastes. While the primary contaminants of concern
are the radioisotopes, these impoundments also contain sediments with elevated levels of other
inorganic and organic contaminants.  Investigations leading to the selection of cleanup remedies
are scheduled for completion in 1997.
 OAK RIDGE RESERVATION (USDOE)
                                                                                 March 1995

-------
           WAG 13:  This area was used for the study of the migration of Cesium-137.  An
           interim action began in early 1993 to excavate cesium-contaminated soils to a level of
           less than 120 picocuries per gram, with disposal into silos at WAG 6.  The interim
cleanup action was completed in the summer of 1994.  No further actions at WAG 13 are
anticipated.
G
           WAG 5:  WAG 5 consists of a major burial ground complex that was used for the
           disposal of radioactive wastes. The burial complex consists of shallow land burial
           trenches, auger holes for disposal of higher activity wastes, and two surface
impoundments.  Two removal actions to intercept and treat two groundwater seep areas that were
contributing significant quantities of Strontium-90 to  the surface water at the site are underway
and scheduled for completion in 1995.   Investigations leading to the selection of a final cleanup
remedy are scheduled for completion in late 1998.

           WAG 6:  WAG 6 consists of a major burial ground complex that was used for the
           disposal of radioactive wastes. The burial complex consists of shallow land burial
           trenches and auger holes which were used for the disposal of higher activity wastes.
Field investigations have shown that releases  from this burial complex do not pose as  significant
a threat as releases from other waste sites at the X-10 Plant; therefore, remedy selection for this
waste area is being delayed to allow other, higher priority areas to be addressed.

           WAG 1  North-South Tank Farm: This area consists of gunite and stainless steel
           tanks that were used in the handling of radioactive wastes.  Investigations into the
           contents of these tanks and potential releases have been completed.   A treatability
study is being implemented to evaluate the feasibility of removing the radioactive sludges from
these tanks for treatment and long-term  storage. Data generated by this treatability study will be
applicable to  all  DOE sites where waste removal from underground tanks is a concern.

           WAG 2:  WAG 2 consists of the surface water system at the X-10  Plant. This
           surface water system serves as the local  groundwater sink for shallow  groundwater in
           the area, and also collects runoff in its drainage basin.  Investigations into the nature
and extent of contamination in this area have  enabled the DOE to identify the different waste
areas that are releasing contaminants into the  surface water. Some of these contaminants are
transported into  the Clinch River system through this surface water pathway. Investigations at
WAG 2 are being conducted in three phases.  Phase  I determined the nature and extent of
contamination in the surface water system and at upstream  sources of contamination.  This phase
determined that the upstream sources were still contributing specific quantities of contamination
and needed to be addressed before cleanup of the surface water system.  Phase II of the
investigation  is a monitoring phase, which  involves cutting  off contamination sources and
ensuring that new sources do not develop.  In Phase  III, cleanup alternatives are being
investigated to address the  contaminated sediments and flood plain soils in the surface water
system.  Phase I investigations at WAG 2 have resulted in the  initiation of removal actions
addressing ongoing contaminant releases into the surface water at WAG 5 and WAG 1. Other
response actions are being  planned as a  result of investigations of the surface water systems.
March 1995                                    6               OAK RIDGE RESERVATION (USDOE)

-------
           X-10 Plant Study Areas:  Investigations into the nature and extent of
           contamination at 69 potential areas will determine the most appropriate cleanup
           actions.
Site Facts:  The DOE has established an agreement with the State of Tennessee to support
regulatory oversight activities,  and has entered into a Federal Facility Agreement with the EPA
and the State of Tennessee. The Federal Facility Agreement establishes enforceable cleanup
schedules for the site.  The DOE has made much progress toward the environmental restoration
of the Oak  Ridge Reservation since the site was listed on the NPL in 1989. The DOE has
developed an integrated data information system which includes survey data of environmentally
sensitive areas, remotely-sensed data, and long-term Oak Ridge Reservation-wide ecological
monitoring data.  Cleanup areas have been divided into  "source" and "integrator" projects.  The
integrator projects will address on- and off-site surface waters  and groundwater, which are
contaminated by multiple sources.  Field investigations suggest that the source of most of the off-
site contamination is  the surface water.  Projects are prioritized for action based on a system that
evaluates the net benefit for performing each cleanup action.  The system evaluates the before
action and after action risks based on the impact on public health, environmental protection, and
site personnel safety.  This evaluation is enhanced by  considering stakeholder expectations,
mission considerations, and cost-effectiveness.  Future challenges to restore the site include
addressing up to 278 separate source areas that require cleanup action and another 166 potentially
contaminated areas that require evaluation to determine  the need for cleanup.
Environmental Progress
Capping the UNC Landfill, stabilizing drums removing contaminated sediments and sludges,
collecting  and treating spring water, and removing radioactive debris have reduced the threats to
people and the environment at the Oak Ridge Reservation (USDOE) site while further cleanup
actions are being planned and conducted.
Site  Repository
Information Resource Center, 105 Broadway Avenue, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831

Oak Ridge Public Library, 1401 Oak Ridge Turnpike, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830
 OAK RIDGE RESERVATION (USDOE)
March 1995

-------
TENNESSEE
PRODUCTS
TENNESSEE
EPA  ID# TND071 51 6959 S
Site Description
                                     EPA REGION 4
                                                County
                                            attanooga
The Tennessee Products site is an aggregation of Southern Coke Corporation (Southern Coke),
Chattanooga Creek Tar Deposit Site and Hamill Toad Dump No. 2. The site is located
approximately 1  mile west of Chattanooga creek in a heavily populated, low-income, urban and
industrial area in the Chattanooga Creek basin.  The site consists of the former Tennessee
Products coke plant and its associated uncontrolled coal-tar dumping grounds in Chattanooga
Creek and its floodplain.  Historical sampling  and aerial photographic evidence indicate that the
tar was dumped  into the creek, on the banks, and in areas near the creek over several years
during the 1940s and 1950s.  During World War II, the U.S. Government purchased the
Tennessee Products facility and operated it for  the war effort.  After the war, the company
bought back the  facility. Documentation of disposal practices of Tennessee Products during this
time period is not available; however, Tennessee Products  maintained a private sewer line that
discharged directly into the creek. The  coal-tar wastes are located  along an approximate 2 1/2
mile section of the creek extending from just upstream of Hamill Road bridge to the creek's
confluence with  Dobbs Branch.  Coal-tar wastes were dumped directly into the creek and onto
the floodplain within the immediate vicinity of  the creek channel. The largest coal-tar deposits
have been found in the creek bed and along its  banks within a 1  mile segment of the creek
between Hamill Road and 38th Street, plus an additional 1  1/2 miles of the creek downstream
from this segment.
Site Responsibility:
The site is being addressed through
Federal actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 01/18/94
Threats  and Contaminants
         Uncontrolled dumping of coal-tar wastes into the Chattanooga Creek has contaminated
         soils at the facility, as well as the surface water, sediments, wetlands, and fisheries
         downstream of the facility. Sampling at the site has revealed elevated levels of
         poly aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in the soil,  surface water, and sediments.
         Touching or ingesting contaminated soils, surface water, sediments, or fish could pose
         a health risk.
                                                                        September 1994

-------
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in two stages:  immediate actions, and a long-term remedial phase
focusing on cleanup of the entire site.
Response Action Status
           Immediate Actions: In late 1993, the EPA fenced sections of the Chattanooga
           Creek to prevent public access.  The installation took place late in 1993.

          Entire Site: The EPA is planning an investigation of the nature and extent of
          contamination.  This investigation will lead to the selection of site cleanup remedies.
Site Facts: The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) issued a Public
Health Advisory for the Tennessee Products Site on August 20, 1993 because of the chemical and
physical hazards presented by coal-tar deposits.
Environmental  Progress
After installing fences to restrict access to sections of the Chattanooga Creek, the EPA has
determined that the site does not pose an immediate risk. The EPA will continue sampling areas
of the site while it plans a full investigation of site contamination.
Site Repository
Alton Park Community Health Center, 100 E 37th St., Chattanooga, TN 37410
 September 1994
                                                                    TENNESSEE PRODUCTS

-------
VELSICOL
CHEMICALj	
(HARDEMAN  COUNTY)
TENNESSEE
EPA ID# TND980559033
     REGION 4
  lardeman County
      Toone
Site Description  	

Velsicol Corporation purchased and used 242 acres of land as the Hardeman County landfill for
disposal of pesticides and volatile organic compounds (VOCs), beginning in 1964. As of 1973,
when the site was closed, waste had been disposed of in three specific areas, covering a total of
approximately 27 acres. Approximately  130,000 drums of plant waste were disposed of in these
three areas in trenches and were covered with 3 feet of soil. In 1980, a low permeability cap was
installed over the surface of the three disposal areas, the surface was regraded to facilitate surface
water drainage, sediment ponds were  backfilled, and topsoil and seed for revegetation were
applied. Currently, the  site is fenced with barbed wire and has a locked gate. Approximately 60
people live within a 1-mile radius of the site. Since 1979,  private wells in the vicinity have not
been used for drinking water; alternate water supplies have been provided. There are public
supply wells within a 3-mile radius of the site; however, monitoring data indicates that  these
wells are not contaminated.
Site Responsibility:   This site is being addressed through
                     Federal and potentially responsible
                     parties' actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 12/30/82
  Final Date: 09/08/83
Threats and  Contaminants
         The groundwater is contaminated with various VOCs, mainly carbon tetrachloride,
         and chloroform. Capping, regrading, fencing, and security have virtually eliminated
         direct contact with the contaminants on the site. However, there may be a health
         threat if the contaminated groundwater in the area is used for drinking water.
Cleanup Approach  	

The site is being addressed in three stages: immediate actions and two long-term remedial phases
focusing on cleanup of the groundwater and controlling the sources of contamination.
                                                                        March 1995

-------
Response Action Status
           Immediate Actions: As a result of chlorinated hydrocarbons detected in two
           residential wells adjacent to the site in 1979, an alternate water source was provided
           to 26 homes that were located within a 1-mile radius of the site. In 1980, capping,
surface regrading, backfilling, and revegetating of the site were performed.
           Ground water: In 1989, Velsicol Chemical Company began a study of the type and
           extent of groundwater contamination and an evaluation of alternative cleanup
           remedies. The investigation was completed in 1991. The plan for groundwater
cleanup includes extraction of groundwater and treatment using settling tanks, air stripping, and
carbon adsorption, followed by the discharge of treated water to nearby surface water.  In
addition, the property will be fenced, restrictions will be placed on the use of wells, and the
effectiveness of the remedy will be monitored. The design of the cleanup remedies began in
1991, and is expected to be completed in early  1995.

           Source Control: In 1991, the Velsicol Chemical Company initiated studies into the
           nature and extent of contamination sources at the site. These studies are expected to
           be completed in 1995, at which time a remedy for source control will be chosen.

Site Facts: Under an Administrative Order on Consent, Velsicol agreed to complete the site
investigations under EPA oversight. Several citizens in the area around the site were  involved in
litigation with the Velsicol Chemical Company concerning pollution of their wells. Concerns
about groundwater contamination were very high about 10 years ago, when water supply wells
became contaminated. Concerns have lessened since alternate water supplies were provided.
Velsicol is presently performing design and cleanup activities under a Unilateral  Administrative
Order.
Environmental Progress
The initial actions to cap the surface of the site, secure access to the site, and provide an alternate
water supply to nearby residents have eliminated immediate threats at the Velsicol Chemical
Corp. (Hardeman County) site while further investigations and cleanup activities are taking place.
 Site  Repository
 Velsicol Hardeman County Public Library, 213 North Washington Street, Belivaar, TN 38008
 March 1995                                  2                     VELSICOL CHEMICAL CORP.
                                                                       (HARDEMAN COUNTY)

-------
WRIGLEY Cm3ffi@m&£$&JEPHAkREGc10?  4
                        ^XbJr^/'^-TTPP^^               Hickman County
P LA N T         fff^^r^f^^^^^   Old Charcoal Road, Wrigley
TENNESSEE
EPA ID# TND980844781
Site Description
The 300-acre Wrigley Charcoal Plant site is composed of 4 sub-site areas located on a 3,000-acre
tract of land. From the late 1800s to the early 1960s, a number of companies, including the
Tennessee Products Corporation, produced charcoal briquettes,  iron products, and wood alcohol
on the site. After pig iron and wood distillation activities ended, the Tennessee Farmers Co-op
acquired. They later sold a portion of the site to an individual. During a 1985 inspection, the
Tennessee Division of Solid Waste Management discovered pits containing a tar-like substance,
waste piles, and old drums. Leachate was entering the north fork of Mill Creek, which is
adjacent to the site. In 1985, the State, and, in 1986, the EPA, detected toluene, benzenes, and
phenols in the wastes and the leachate. In 1988, the Bon Aqua Utility District drinking water
intake was relocated to an upstream portion of Mill Creek due to concerns over potential tar pit
failure.  This intake serves an estimated 5,500 people. Approximately 300 people obtain drinking
water from wells within 3 miles of the site.
_.   _       .....      _, .   .  .  ,  .    ,,     , ,    ,           NPL LISTING HISTORY
Site Responsibility:   This site is being addressed through
                      Federal and State actions.
Proposed Date: 06/24/88
  Final Date: 03/31/89
Threats  and Contaminants
          The leachate and wastes on the primary site and storage basin contain volatile organic
          compounds (VOCs) including toluene, benzene, and phenol and PAHs. The North
          Fork of Mill Creek is contaminated with low levels of the same elements as those
          found in the leachate. Health threats include the accidental ingestion of or direct
          contact with the wastes on site. Geologic conditions at the site make it easy for
          contaminants to move into the shallow groundwater, which lies about  5 feet below the
          site.
                                                                            March 1995

-------
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in four stages: immediate actions, an interim action and two long-
term remedial phases focusing on cleanup of the tar wastes and metals hot-spots and cleanup of
the ground water.
Response Action Status
           Immediate Actions: In 1988, the EPA stabilized the tar pits by building a 16-foot
           berm to prevent erosion and seasonal flooding. A stream was rerouted to prevent
           leachate from entering Mill Creek. In 1989, the EPA excavated and shipped six
truckloads of tar to the Allied Signal Facility where the tar was effectively destroyed.

           Interim Action: In 1991, the EPA completed studies of the nature and extent of
           contamination from exposed tars, asbestos-containing material,  and metallic wastes at
           the Burn Pit.  An interim remedy was selected in late  1991 which includes addressing
the above problem at the primary  site as well as posting access restrictions  at the Storage Basin
where tar sludges were found. Cleanup activities addressing the primary site were successfully
completed by the summer of 1994. The activities included removing waste  debris piles, process
tanks and associated tars, cleaning up the Burn Pit in the maintenance building, reconstructing a
spillway, removing tar-contaminated soils from a sump at the still house, and conducting
additional sampling at an irrigation and an athletic field to ensure that further cleanup actions
were not necessary. The second phase of cleanup addressing the Storage Basin is scheduled for
completion in the fall of 1995. Activities will begin in  mid-1995 and will include excavating and
cleaning raw  wood tar sludges and recycling the tar waste to be used as fuel in an industrial
boiler.

           Tar Wastes and Metals Hot-Spots: Following the completion of both phases of
           the interim cleanup action, the EPA will evaluate metals "hot spots" and tar pit
           cleanup alternatives at the site.

           Groundwater: In  1991, an investigation  was completed that  addressed surface and
           near-surface groundwater at the site. Once both phases of the interim cleanup action
           are completed,  additional groundwater investigative activities may be initiated. These
activities would likely precede any additional cleanup activities for tar pits  or metals hot spots.
Environmental Progress
The immediate and interim cleanup activities conducted at the Wrigley Charcoal Plant site have
reduced the threat to the community and the environment while further cleanup activities and
investigations  are conducted.
March 1995
                                                                  WRIGLEY CHARCOAL PLANT

-------
Site  Repository
Hickman County Public Library, 120 West Swann Street, Centerville, TN 37033
WRIGLEY CHARCOAL PLANT
                                                                        March 1995

-------