&EPA
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Solid Waste And
Emergency Response
(5201 G)
SUPERFUND:
EPA/540/R-95/074
PB95-962906
9200.5-705C
May 1995
Progress at
National
Priority
List Sites
ARKANSAS
1995 UPDATE
Printed on Recycled Paper
-------
How to Use the NPL Book
The site fact sheets presented in this book
are comprehensive summaries that cover a
broad range of information. The fact sheets
describe hazardous waste sites on the NPL and
their locations, as well as the conditions
leading to their listing ("Site Description").
The summaries list the types of contaminants
that have been discovered and related threats
to public and ecological health ("Threats and
Contaminants"). "Cleanup Approach" pres-
ents an overview of the cleanup activities
completed, underway, or planned. The fact
sheets conclude with a brief synopsis of how
much progress has been made in protecting
public health and the environment. The
summaries also pinpoint other actions, such as
legal efforts to involve polluters responsible
for site contamination and community con-
cerns.
The fact sheets are arranged in alphabetical
Order by site name. Because site cleanup is a
dynamic and gradual process, all site informa-
tion is accurate as of the date shown on the
bottom of each page. Progress is always being
made at NPL sites, and the EPA periodically
will update the site fact sheets to reflect recent
actions. The following two pages show a
generic fact sheet and briefly describe the
information under each section.
How Can You Use
This State Book?
You can use this book to keep informed
about the sites that concern you, particu-
larly ones close to home. The EPA is commit-
ted to involving the public in the decision
making process associated with hazardous
waste cleanup. The Agency solicits input from
area residents in communities affected by
Superfund sites. Citizens are likely to be
affected not only by hazardous site conditions,
but also by the remedies that combat them.
Site cleanups take many forms and can affect
communities in different ways. Local traffic
may be rerouted, residents may be relocated,
temporary water supplies may be necessary.
Definitive information on a site can help
citizens sift through alternatives and make
decisions. To make good choices, you must
know what the threats are and how the EPA
intends to clean up the site. You must under-
stand the cleanup alternatives being proposed
for site cleanup and how residents may be
affected by each one. You also need to have
some idea of how your community intends to
use the site in the future, and you need to know
what the community can realistically expect
once the cleanup is complete.
The EPA wants to develop cleanup methods
that meet community needs, but the Agency
only can take local concerns into account if it
understands what they are. Information must
travel both ways in order for cleanups to be
effective and satisfactory. Please take this
opportunity to learn more, become involved,
and assure that hazardous waste cleanup at
"your" site considers your community's
concerns.
-------
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Provides the dates when the
site was Proposed, made, Final,
and Deleted from the NPL.
SITE RESPONSIBILITY
Identifies the Federal, State,
and/or potentially responsible
parties taking responsibility
for cleanup actions at the site.
ENVIRONMENTAL
PROGRESS
Summarizes the actions to
reduce the threats to nearby
residents and the surrounding
environment and the progress
towards cleaning up the site.
SITE NAME
STATE
EPA ID# ABCOOOOOOO
Site Description
EPA REGION XX
COUNTY NAME
LOCATION
Other Names:
; xxx xxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxx :
: xxxxxxxxxx xxxx xxxxxxxx xxxx xx xxxxxxxxx xx xxxxxx xxxxxxxx \
XXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX XX XXXXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXX X XXX
XXXXXXX XXX II liliTtll 4JgtXXX XXXXX XXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXXXXXXXX :
XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX^S«SXJC XXX XX XXXXXXXXX XXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXX If II llTlhllH flllll II II XXXXXXXX XXXXX XXXX XXXXX XXX XXX XXXXXX
xxxxxxxxxxxx xx xxxxxxx xxx xxxxx xxkMucxx xxxxxx xx xxxx xxx xxxxx xxx xxxxx xxx xxxxx
Site Responsibility: ***««
xxxxxx xxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxx
XXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX
NPL Listing History
Proposed: XX/XX/XX
Final: XX/XX/XX
Threats and Contaminants
xxxxxx xxx xxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxx
XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XX XXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXX XXX XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXX XXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX XX XXXXXX XXXX
XXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXX XXXXXX XXXXXX XXXXX XXXXXX
XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXX X XXX XX
XXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXX
Cleanup Approach
xxxxxx xxx xxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxx
XXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX KX XXXXXXXXX XX XXXXXX XXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXX XXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX XX XXXXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXX X XXX XXXXXXXX
Response Action Status
xxxxxx xxx xxxxx :
: xxxxxx xxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxx
XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXX XXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX XX XXXXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXX X :
XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXX X XXX XX XXXXXXXXX XXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXX
XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXX XXXX XXXXX XXX
XXX XXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX XX XXXXXXX XXX XXXXXX XX XXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXX 1
Site Facts:
XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XX XXXXXXXXX XX XXXXXX
, XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXX XXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX XX XXXXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXX X XXX
^•Hxxxxxx xxx xxxxxx
Environmental Progress
xxxxxx xxx xxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxx ;
XXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XX XXXXXXXXX XX XXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXX
xxxxxxxx xxxxxxx :
; xxxxxx xxxxxx xxx xxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxx
Site Repository
XXXXXX XXX XXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXX :
SITE REPOSITORY
Lists the location of the primary site repository. The site
repository may include community relations plans, public
meeting announcements and minutes, fact sheets, press
releases, and other site-related documents.
-------
SITE DESCRIPTION
This section describes the location and history of the site. It includes descrip-
tions of the most recent activities and past actions at the site that have con-
tributed to the contamination. Population estimates, land usages, and nearby
resources give readers background on the local setting surrounding the site.
THREATS AND CONTAMINANTS
The major chemical categories of site contamination are noted, as well as
which environmental resources are affected. Icons representing each of the
affected resources (may include air, groundwater, surface water, soil, and
contamination to environmentally sensitive areas) are included in the margins
of this section. Potential threats to residents and the surrounding environ-
ments arising from the site contamination also are described.
CLEANUP APPROACH
This section contains a brief overview of how the site is being cleaned up.
RESPONSE ACTION STATUS
Specific actions that have been accomplished or will be undertaken to clean
up the site are described here. Cleanup activities at NPL sites are divided
into separate phases, depending on the complexity and required actions at the
site.. Two major types of cleanup activities often are described: initial,
immediate, or emergency actions to quickly remove or reduce imminent
threats to the community and surrounding areas; and long-term remedial
phases directed at final cleanup at the site. Each stage of the cleanup strategy
is presented in this section of the summary. Icons representing the stage of
the cleanup process (initial actions, site investigations, EPA selection of the
cleanup remedy, engineering design phase, cleanup activities underway, and
completed cleanup) are located in the margin next to each activity descrip-
tion.
SITE FACTS
Additional information on activities and events at the site are included in this
section. Often details on legal or administrative actions taken by the EPA to
achieve site cleanup or other facts pertaining to community involvement with
the site cleanup process are reported here.
-------
Guide to the NPL Book Icons
The "icons," or symbols, accompanying the text allow the reader to see at a glance which envi-
ronmental resources are affected and the status of cleanup activities at the site.
Icons in the Threats
and Contaminants
Section
Icons in the Response
Action Status Section
Contaminated Ground-water re-
sources in the vicinity or underlying
the site. (Groundwater is often used
as a drinking water source.)
Contaminated Surface Water and
Sediments on or near the site.
(These include lakes, ponds,
streams, and rivers.)
Contaminated Air in the vicinity of
the site. (Air pollution usually is
periodic and involves contaminated
dust particles or hazardous gas
emissions.)
Contaminated Soil and Sludges on
or near the site. (This contamination
category may include bulk or other
surface hazardous wastes found on
the site.)
Threatened or contaminated Envi-
ronmentally Sensitive Areas in the
vicinity of the site. (Examples
include wetlands and coastal areas
or critical habitats.)
Initial, Immediate, or Emergency
Actions have been taken or are
underway to eliminate immediate
threats at the site.
Site Studies at the site to determine
the nature and extent of contamina-
tion are planned or underway.
Remedy Selected indicates that site
investigations have been concluded,
and the EPA has selected a final
cleanup remedy for the site or part
of the site.
Remedy Design means that engi-
neers are preparing specifications
and drawings for the selected
cleanup technologies.
Cleanup Ongoing indicates that the
selected cleanup remedies for the
contaminated site, or part of the site,
currently are underway.
Cleanup Complete shows that all
cleanup goals have been achieved
for the contaminated site or part of
the site.
-------
EPA ID
Number Site Name
ARD084930148 ARKWOOD, INC.
ARD980496186 CECIL LINDSEY SITE
ARD059636456 FRIT INDUSTRIES
ARD035662469 GURLEY PIT
ARD980496368 INDUSTRIAL WASTE CONTROL
ARD980809941 JACKSONVILLE MUNICIPAL LANDFILL
ARD092916188 MID-SOUTH WOOD PRODUCTS
ARD980745665 MIDLAND PRODUCTS
ARD980864110 MONROE AUTO EQUIPMENT (PARAGOULD PIT)
ARD008052508 POPILE, INC.
ARD981055809 ROGERS ROAD MUNICIPAL LANDFILL
ARD980496723 SOUTH 8TH STREET LANDFILL
ARD000023440 VERTAC, INC.
-------
ARKWOOD, I
ARKANSAS
EPA ID# ARD08493014&
EPA REGION 6
Boone County
1/2 mile south of Omaha
Site Description
The 18-acre Arkwood, Inc. wood-treatment plant site consisted of a millwork shop, a treating
plant that used creosote and pentachlorophenol (PCP), and a yard for storing pretreated wood
prior to sale. Operations began in the early 1960s. In 1973, the owner leased the facility to Mass
Merchandisers, Inc. (MMI), which operated it until 1984. The plant was dismantled in 1986.
During operation, the plant generated 6,000 to 7,000 pounds of waste each year. Wastes from
site operations were dumped into a sinkhole on site until 1970. The sinkhole since has been
sealed. Waste oils were placed in a ditch next to the railroad until 1974, when MMI began using
a chemical recovery system. Other wastes, including liquids used to wash the treatment
equipment, were stored in a tank and then spread over the storage yard to control dust. Existing
on-site structures include a debarking shed, a small well house, and numerous old foundations.
The site was listed on the NPL when PCP and other organic chemicals were found in area
groundwater. Approximately 650 people within 3 miles of the site rely on private wells for
drinking water. The closest well is less than 1/4 mile from the site; 12 residences immediately
down Cricket Valley have been connected to the city water supply. Fifty-four springs have been
identified within a 1 1/2 miles radius of the site. Only one spring, the New Cricket Spring, has
been shown to be hydraulically connected to the site in a downgradient direction. There are no
known users of the water from this spring. The area surrounding the site is predominantly
agricultural.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal and potentially responsible
parties' actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 09/04/85
Final Date: 03/31/89
Threats and Contaminants
PCP was found in groundwater monitoring wells on site and in New Cricket Spring.
Soil samples from disposal areas on site were shown to contain PCP, mostly
concentrated in the top 2 feet of soil. Creosotes and hazardous by-products of PCP
also were found in the soils. Residents who live less than a mile from the site use
groundwater as their sole source of drinking water. Groundwater supplying drinking
wells may be contaminated due to underground geology and water flow at the site.
Potential threats include drinking contaminated groundwater or accidentally ingesting
or coming into direct contact with contaminated soil, surface water, and sediments.
July 1995
-------
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in two stages: an immediate action and a long-term remedial phase
focusing on cleanup of the entire site.
Response Action Status
Immediate Action: In response to the immediate threat of contact with hazardous
materials, the parties potentially responsible for site contamination installed a fence
and warning signs in 1987.
Entire Site: In 1990, under EPA supervision, MMI completed a site investigation to
determine the nature and extent of contamination. In 1990, the EPA chose on-site
pretreatment, storage, and incineration of the contaminated soils as the final cleanup
remedy. Design of the remedies began in late 1991. In 1994, the parties potentially responsible
for site contamination began an interim cleanup action focusing on pretreatment and storage of
contaminated soil. Mobilization for this action was mostly completed in late 1994. Design of an
incinerator began in 1991 and is scheduled to be completed in 1995. The design focuses on
backfilling measures necessary to minimize ash produced from the incineration process.
Site Facts: In 1986, the EPA signed an Administrative Order requiring MMI to conduct
investigations to determine the nature and extent of contamination and to identify alternatives for
cleaning up the site.
Environmental Progress
Fencing the site and installing warning signs have limited access to the site, thereby reducing the
potential of exposure to hazardous substances at the Arkwood, Inc. site and making the area safer
while final cleanup activities are underway and being planned.
Site Repository
Omaha Public School, College Street, Omaha, AR 72662
July 1995
ARKWOOD, INC.
-------
CECIL LINDS
ARKANSAS
EPA ID# ARD980496186
EPA REGION 6
Jackson County
1/2 miles northeast of Newport
Other Names:
City of Diaz Dump
Site Description
From the early 1970s to 1980, the 5-acre Cecil Lindsey site was used as a salvage operation,
collecting machinery, cars, and scrap metals. Some municipal and industrial wastes were
reportedly disposed of on the property, although the operators had no permit to accept them.
Drums that previously held pesticides and oils containing heavy metals were disposed of on site.
About 20 homes housing 50 residents are located within 1 mile of the site, the nearest is located
600 feet from the site. The nearest drinking water well is located 1,200 feet away, but all private
drinking water wells are upgradient of the site. The site is adjacent to the Village Creek wetlands
and forested bottomland in an agricultural area. Portions of the site, which lies within the flood
plain of Village Creek, are often flooded.
Site Responsibility:
This site was addressed through
Federal actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 12/30/82
Final Date: 09/08/83
Deleted Date: 09/22/89
Threats and Contaminants
Heavy metals and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were found in groundwater
underlying the site. Heavy metals including arsenic, cadmium, and copper were found
in soil throughout the site and VOCs were found in the southern portion of the site.
Threats to drinking water were remote. Drinking water wells were not contaminated
because they were located upgradient of the site.
July 1995
-------
Cleanup Approach
Response Action Status
Soil Cleanup and Groundwater Monitoring: In 1987, the EPA placed
groundwater and access restrictions on the site, installed monitoring wells, removed
the drums, and performed one year of site monitoring. No other cleanup actions were
selected, since the EPA, in conjunction with the State, determined that the site was cleaned to
levels that are safe to people and the environment. Sampling results showed that contamination
levels in the groundwater have lowered. The EPA deleted the site from the NPL in 1989.
Environmental Progress
All cleanup is complete at the Cecil Lindsey site. Cleanup actions successfully eliminated the
potential for accidental contact with any contaminated material on site. As a result of these
actions, the EPA determined that the site meets established ecological and health standards and
deleted the site from the NPL in 1989.
July 1995
CECIL LINDSEY SITE
-------
FRIT INDUST
ARKANSAS
EPA ID# ARD059636456
EPA REGION 6
Lawrence County
2 miles northwest of Jonesboro
Site Description
The 30-acre Frit Industries is an active fertilizer plant. Product materials (micronutrients) and
raw waste were stored in piles on the ground without a liner or cover. Waste piles on site were
unprotected from rain, wind, and surface water runoff; therefore, materials have been dispersed
across the site. In 1979, a fire consumed portions of a product storage facility. The water used to
extinguish the fire further contaminated the soil and surface water, and the resulting runoff of
approximately 81,000 gallons of contaminated water into Coon Creek caused a fishkill.
Approximately 100 tons of contaminated soil were excavated from drainage pathways in 1982.
The nearest residence is 3 miles away. Although the community has a municipal water system,
there is an industrial park well approximately 1/4 mile from the site.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal, State, and potentially
responsible parties' actions.
NPL Listing History
Proposed Date: 10/23/81
Final Date: 09/08/83
Threats and Contaminants
The groundwater, surface water, and soil are contaminated with zinc sulfate,
cadmium, chromium, and lead. Runoff from the site is channeled into a nearby creek
by approximately 1 mile of drainage ditches. This creek flows into another creek,
which discharges into the White River 4 miles downstream of the site. Nearby
residents could become exposed to heavy metals in the soil and water of Coon Creek
and the drainage ditches, which have received 81,000 gallons of contaminated water.
Threats to people include accidental ingestion of contaminated waters or soil,
inhalation of dusts generated at the site, and direct contact with contaminants from
dusts, groundwater, or surface water. The U.S. Department of Interior has noted that
the site is a potential threat to fish and wildlife resources.
August 1995
-------
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in two stages: initial actions and a long-term remedial phase
focusing on the cleanup of the entire site.
Response Action Status
Initial Actions: Approximately 100 tons of contaminated soil were excavated from
drainage pathways to Coon Creek in 1982.
Entire Site:In 1983, Frit Industries began an investigation into the nature and extent
of groundwater contamination and the buildup of heavy metals in the sediments of
drainage ditches and Coon Creek. In early 1985, Frit Industries completed
construction of an on-site surface water treatment plant. In mid-1987, Frit Industries agreed to
develop and implement a site closure plan under the Resource Conservation Recovery Act
(RCRA) for the waste piles and the sludge pond. Frit also agreed to perform a groundwater
evaluation and develop a post-closure groundwater monitoring plan. Frit Industries and the EPA
are tested to determine the effectiveness of the water runoff treatment plant and found it to be
satisfactory. All cleanup actions are expected to be completed in 1995.
Site Facts: An Administrative Order signed in 1982 required Frit to construct a surface water
runoff treatment plant and to continue the monitoring of runoff. In 1983, an additional
Administrative Order required Frit Industries to perform an investigation at the site and to
develop and implement a site-wide cleanup plan. This plan is being reviewed by the EPA to
ensure compliance under RCRA. Any further cleanup actions will be taken under authority of the
RCRA instead of Superfund.
Environmental Progress
The water runoff treatment plant is effectively controlling threats from surface water runoff. In
addition, the removal of contaminated soil has reduced threats to the public and the environment
at the Frit Industries site while it is being addressed under RCRA authorities.
Site Repository
Lawrence County Library, 1315 West Main Street, Walnut Ridge, AR 72476
August 1995 2 FRIT INDUSTRIES
-------
GURLEY PIT
ARKANSAS
EPA ID# ARD03566246S
EPA REGION 6
Crittenden County
1 mile north of Edmondson
Site Description
Gurley Pit encompasses approximately 3 1/2 acres, which are divided into three levees, or cells.
In 1970, Gurley Refining Company leased the pit for disposal of secondary oil refinery wastes.
From 1970 until 1975, the pit was used for the disposal of oil sludges and filter material. In
1976, the company closed the part of the refining operations that generated the wastes disposed
of at the site. Site discharges contaminated a nearby stream, Fifteen Mile Bayou, damaging fish
and wildlife. This site is an agricultural area. Approximately 286 people live in nearby
Edmondson. Five residences are located within 1/2 mile of the site. Several citizens have
complained about odors emanating from the site. The nearest drinking well is located
approximately 2 miles southeast of the site.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal and potentially responsible
parties' actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 12/30/82
Final Date: 09/08/83
Threats and Contaminants
The soil is contaminated with heavy metals including arsenic, barium, chromium,
lead, and zinc. Sludges and surface water are contaminated with polychlorinated
biphenyls (PCBs) and heavy metals including lead. The site is located within the 100-
year flood plain of the Fifteen Mile Bayou, which discharges to the Mississippi River.
Overflows that have occurred during rain events have caused a light oil slick which
had an adverse effect on fish and waterfowl. People using the shallow aquifer as a
source of drinking water may be exposed to site contaminants.
July 1995
-------
Cleanup Approach
Response Action Status
Emergency Actions: After floods in 1978 and 1979, the EPA performed
emergency cleanup of oil from the pit. In 1979, the EPA installed drains and pumps
to remove accumulated stormwater. In 1984, the potentially responsible parties for
the site contamination built a fence and repaired the dikes. In 1989, the potentially responsible
parties implemented measures to reduce water levels in the pits and reinforced berms.
Groundwater: Contamination from the pit has not migrated through the subsurface
into the groundwater. Elevated levels of inorganic contaminants were detected but
were consistent with natural background levels. No site-related contaminants were
identified in the groundwater. Therefore, the EPA has decided that no cleanup actions are
required for groundwater. The groundwater will be monitored for at least 30 years to ensure that
migration of contaminants does not occur.
Source Control: In 1986, the EPA chose a final cleanup remedy for the site.
Surface water within the pits will be treated on site and discharged into the bayou. Oil
containing PCBs from the water treatment process will be incinerated off site. Sludges
will be stabilized on site and placed in a federally approved vault. Design of the cleanup remedies
was completed in 1988; however, due to litigation technicalities and design modifications, the
design was not finalized until late 1991. Construction of the vault was completed in 1994.
Dewatering of the solidified materials in the vault is scheduled to be complete hi 1995.
Site Facts: The EPA completed an Enforcement Decision Document in 1986 which addressed
cleanup of the contamination sources at the site. In early 1990, the EPA issued a Unilateral
Order, under which the parties potentially responsible for the site contamination would clean up
the source of contamination. There have been citizen complaints about odors from the site.
Environmental Progress
All construction is complete. The emergency actions to cleanup and reduce the oil pollution and
the treatment of soils and hazardous materials have reduced the threats to the public and the
environment at the Gurley Pit site while dewatering of the solidified materials is completed.
Site Repository
Edmondson City Hall, 502 Waterford Street, Edmondson, AR 72662
July 1995 2 GURLEY PIT
-------
INDUSTRIAL
CONTROL
ARKANSAS
EPA ID# ARD98049636
EPA REGION 6
Sebastian County
miles southeast of Fort Smith,
1 mile west of Jenny Lind
Site Description
The Industrial Waste Control (IWC) site is located on 8 acres and is a closed and covered
industrial landfill. The site is located in a strip mine that was abandoned and then used for local
dumping. Landfilling with municipal refuse and construction debris began in the late 1960s or
early 1970s. The site was operated by IWC under permit from 1974 to 1978. Industries used it to
dispose of a wide variety of liquid and solid wastes. IWC built several ponds on the site for
liquid wastes, and as many as 9,000 drums of waste also may have been buried there. The
facility was closed in 1978 and the landfill was covered and graded. The site is partially covered
with natural vegetation. In 1979, heavy rainfall flooded the waste ponds, contaminating nearby
pastures and ponds. Fish kills were reported, and local landowners filed for damages. The site is
located in a rural area with a population of approximately 750 people. Eighteen homes lie within
1/2 mile of the site, and the nearest residence and well are 200 feet away.
Site Responsibility:
This site was being addressed through
Federal and potentially responsible
parties' actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 12/30/82
Final Date: 09/08/83
Threats and Contaminants
Sediments and soil were contaminated with volatile organic compounds (VOCs)
including methylene chloride and toluene, poly cyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs),
and heavy metals including chromium, nickel, and lead. A site overflow in 1979
caused fish kills. Because the site was not being used, there was no immediate health
risk from human contact with contaminated soil or water. However, future use of the
site or future migration of contaminants was of concern. No contaminants existed in
usable water sources, although it was possible that buried drums would disintegrate in
the ground, releasing additional wastes that could have percolated through the soil and
threatened groundwater. The possibility of groundwater contamination spreading
through the interconnections between the extensive underground mine workings to the
north and the surface strip mine under the site was a major concern.
July 1995
-------
Cleanup Approach
Response Action Status
Source Control and Ground water Protection: The remedies selected for the
IWC site included: removing approximately 5,000 liquid-filled drums to an EPA-
approved off-site facility; excavating about 2,000 cubic yards of contaminated soil,
which was stabilized and redeposited in the excavations; building an underground barrier wall of
slurry to prevent contaminant movement; installing a french drain (a perforated pipe at the
bottom of a trench surrounded by sand and gravel filters) for collecting and diverting
groundwater around the site to avoid contamination; building ditches and berms to prevent
surface water from flowing onto the site; removing groundwater found during excavation to an
off-site hazardous waste facility or treating it on site, as appropriate; covering the site with a
multi-layered cap consisting of a synthetic liner, clay, sand, soil, and plants; installing a fence
and imposing land use restrictions; and monitoring groundwater and assessing the site every five
years for remedy effectiveness. These cleanup actions were completed in 1990 by the potentially
responsible parties under EPA oversight. The final inspection of the site was completed in 1991.
Operation and maintenance at the site will continue to ensure the effectiveness of the selected
remedies.
Site Facts: A Consent Decree was signed hi 1989 with the Steering Committee for the parties
potentially responsible for site contamination to implement the selected cleanup actions.
Environmental Progress
All cleanup activities have been completed. Removal of contaminated materials, installation of
barriers to prevent water movement, and other cleanup actions have eliminated the threat to
human health and the environment from the Industrial Waste Control site.
Site Repository
Fort Smith Public Library, 61 South Eight Street, Fort Smith, AR 72076
July 1995
INDUSTRIAL WASTE CONTROL
-------
JACKSONVILL
MUNICIPAL LA
ARKANSAS
EPA ID# ARD980809941
Site Description
EPA REGION 6
Pulaski County
Graham Road
east of Jacksonville
Other Names:
Graham Road Landfill
The Jacksonville Municipal Landfill site consists of 80 acres bought by the City of Jacksonville in
1960 and operated as a municipal landfill until 1973. Forty of the 80 acres are contaminated. The
landfill had no permit and kept no records of the wastes it accepted. The site was closed when
the State turned down its permit application due to the high water table and poor site drainage.
The site came to the EPA's attention in 1983, when citizens complained that the landfill had been
accepting hazardous wastes. A former county employee maintains that wastes at first were
burned, but odor complaints prompted a change to dumping wastes into unlined trenches as deep
as 25 feet. No cover was applied over disposed hazardous wastes. Drums of industrial and
chemical waste were also accepted. The site is located within 1/2 mile of the Rogers Road
Landfill, which is also listed on the NPL. The property floods during heavy rainfall.
Groundwater in the area is as little as 5 feet below the ground surface. Approximately 10,000
people live within 3 miles of the site; they draw drinking water from public and private wells
located within 3 miles of the site. The nearest private well is located 500 feet from the site.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal and municipal actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 01/22/87
Final Date: 07/22/87
Threats and Contaminants
Soil contamination appears to be restricted to the four drum areas on the site; there is
no off-site contamination. Principal contaminants include TCDD (dioxin),
polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), and herbicides. The landfill floods during heavy
rains, contaminating surface water with herbicides. The site was unrestricted, and
children were seen playing on it until 1985. The water table is shallow, and the site is
poorly drained. The potential exists for exposure through direct contact with
hazardous materials and soils on site. Contaminated water could leave the site because
no runoff controls exist.
July 1995
-------
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in two stages: initial actions and a long-term remedial phase focusing
on the entire site.
Response Action Status
Initial Actions: The City of Jacksonville installed a fence around the site in 1986 to
prevent public access.
Entire Site: The EPA completed an investigation into the nature and extent of site
contamination in 1990. During the investigation, workers installed 20 groundwater
monitoring wells, and these, as well as residential wells, were sampled. This
assessment indicated that hazardous chemicals were restricted to the site. In 1990, the EPA
selected a remedy for cleanup of the site, which entails thermal treatment of wastes and ash
disposal at the Vertac Chemical Corporation, capping of residual wastes left on site, long-term
groundwater monitoring, and site maintenance. Design of the remedy was completed in 1993.
Wastes containing hazardous substances were excavated and transported to Vertac in the fall of
1994. These wastes included 498 cubic yards of soil and 22 drums of hazardous waste. The City
of Jacksonville is currently regrading the site. Access to the site will remain restricted and the
City will conduct groundwater monitoring and site operation and maintenance activities until at
least 1999.
Site Facts: In June 1994, the City of Jacksonville entered into a mixed work settlement with the
EPA for cleanup of the site.
Environmental Progress
Excavation of hazardous substances and fencing the site has reduced the potential of exposure to
contaminants at the Jacksonville Landfill while operation and maintenance of the site is
underway.
Site Repository
Jacksonville City Hall, 1 Industrial Drive, Jacksonville, AR 72076
July 1995 2 JACKSONVILLE MUNICIPAL LANDFILL
-------
MID-SOUTH
PRODUCTS
ARKANSAS
EPA ID# ARD09291618
Site Description
EPA REGION 6
Polk County
1/2 mile southwest of Mena
between Hwy. 71 and Hwy. 375
Other Names:
Mid-South Lumber Products
The 57-acre Mid-South Wood Products site currently operates as a wood treatment plant.
Originally, it was a post and pole factory in the late 1930s. Wood treating operations with
pentachlorophenol (PCP) and creosote were conducted between 1967 and 1977. The site involves
several areas, including the old plant site, two old holding ponds, and two landfarm areas. The
old plant area was used to treat wood with PCP and creosote. The small old pond received these
chemicals as wastes. Both of these areas have been covered with soil. The other old pond area
was used to store PCP and creosote sludge and has since been graded and covered with soil.
Materials from the old pond were spread over the landfarm areas and mixed into the soil. The
landfill area contains waste wood products. Clear Lake receives runoff from all the other areas.
In 1977, the chromated copper arsenate (CCA) process was introduced at the plant. It still is
being used, and surface drainage from the plant is put into sumps. Approximately 40 to 50
people live on 18 properties next to the site; 14 wells are located nearby. About 5,700 people are
served by drinking water wells located within 1 mile of the site. Investigations of the plant began
in 1976, when several fish kills were reported downstream of the site. Valuable stream fisheries
are located near the site.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal and potentially responsible
parties' actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 10/23/81
Final Date: 09/08/83
Threats and Contaminants
The groundwater, standing surface water, soil, and sediments were contaminated with
PCP, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and heavy metals including arsenic
and chromium. EPA estimates that there were between 80,000 and 100,000 cubic
yards of contaminated soil on site. The people served by drinking water wells risked
exposure to contaminated groundwater. These residents have now been connected to
an uncontaminated public water supply. The surface water contamination initially
affected valuable stream fisheries in the area of the site; however, cleanup activities
have addressed the contamination and the fisheries are no longer threatened.
July 1995
-------
Cleanup Approach
Response Action Status
Initial Actions: Homes to the northwest of the site, the direction of groundwater
flow, have been connected to the Mena city water system.
Soil and Groundwater Treatment: An investigation into the nature and extent of
site contamination was completed in 1986. The remedies selected included:
excavating, consolidating, and stabilizing contaminated soils and placing them in the
North Landfarm area; covering the North Landfarm area with a clay cap to keep water out;
locating free oil, liquids, or sludges in the Old Pond area and stabilizing them in place; installing
a french drain system to channel water to the groundwater treatment system; and cleaning up the
groundwater treatment facility. The potentially responsible parties undertook both the design
work and the cleanup actions at the Mid-South Wood Products site. The soil cleanup phase is
completed, and the groundwater recovery and treatment system has been built and is currently
operating. Groundwater is pumped from recovery wells and treated with activated carbon. Any
resulting oils or sludges from the groundwater treatment are disposed of off site and the cleaned
water is discharged to East Fork Moon Creek. Groundwater too highly contaminated with
inorganics to discharge is recycled and used as process water in the wood treatment plant.
Groundwater monitoring measures the effectiveness of cleanup activities. The parties potentially
responsible for site contamination maintain the site, inspect it, and continue to clean the
groundwater. The EPA will review remedy effectiveness every five years. The first five-year
review was conducted in 1993.
Site Facts: The parties potentially responsible for contamination of the site signed a Consent
Decree to perform the cleanup remedy in 1987. Nearby residents have expressed concern over
surface water impacts and runoff from the currently operating wood treatment plant.
Environmental Progress
Providing a safe drinking water source and cleaning up the nearly 100,000 cubic yards of
contaminated soil have reduced contamination levels at the Mid-South Wood Products site.
Construction of a groundwater extraction and treatment system is complete and groundwater
treatment is ongoing.
Site Repository
Polk County Library, 410 Eighth Street, Mena, AR 71953
July 1995 2 MID-SOUTH WOOD PRODUCTS
-------
MIDLAND
PRODUCTS
ARKANSAS
EPA ID# ARD98074566
EPA REGION 6
Yell County
1/2 mile east of Ola
on Hwy. 10
Other Names:
Old Midland Products Company
Site Description
The Midland Products site, a 37-acre wood treating facility and sawmill that operated from 1969
to 1979, is now bankrupt and abandoned. The site is contaminated from past activities, especially
in the 2-acre area where the wood treatment facilities and liquid waste lagoons are located. The
wood treatment processes involved pentachlorophenol (PCP) and creosote. Most of the
contamination is in the soils and sediments in and around the lagoon area. Runoff paths from the
lagoon area feed into an intermittent stream that flows off site. Contaminated oil was found in the
shallow groundwater, but has not moved off site. Approximately 190 people live in this
agricultural area. A home adjoins the southwest corner of the site; the nearest drinking well is
located 400 feet west, and residents within a 3-mile radius depend on private wells. The Petit
Jean State Wildlife Management Area is located 1 mile north of the site.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal and State actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 10/15/84
Final Date: 06/10/86
Threats and Contaminants
The groundwater, lagoon sediments, and soil are contaminated with PCP, polycyclic
aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), dioxins, and furans from wood treating operations.
People could be exposed to the contaminants through direct contact with or accidental
ingestion of contaminated materials. A nearby chicken farm and other nearby
commercial establishments may be threatened by the contaminated site runoff.
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in a long-term remedial phase directed at soil and groundwater
cleanup.
July 1995
-------
Response Action Status
Soil and Groundwater Cleanup: An investigation into the nature and extent of site
contamination was completed in 1987. The selected remedies at this site include:
(1) collecting contaminated lagoon liquids and stormwater runoff and treating the
liquids using carbon adsorption; (2) installing four ground water recovery wells with oil removal
systems, pumping at an accelerated rate, and treating the groundwater by carbon adsorption;
(3) excavating the contaminated soils, sediments, and sludges from the lagoons and drainage-
ways and destroying these wastes using on-site incineration; and (4) placing the clean ash on site
and covering it with a vegetated soil cover. The engineering design of the selected remedies was
completed in 1990, and cleanup is underway. The State is taking the lead on site cleanup, with
assistance from the EPA. Approximately 102,000 tons of creosote-contaminated sludges and soils
were incinerated by May 1993. Groundwater treatment is underway and expected to be completed
in 1998.
Environmental Progress
The completion of the incineration of sludges and soils has reduced site threats while
groundwater treatment is underway at the Midland Products site.
Site Repository
Ola City Hall, East Fourche Avenue, Ola, AR 72853
July 1995
MIDLAND PRODUCTS
-------
MONROE AU
EQUIPMENT
(PARAGOULD
ARKANSAS
EPA ID# ARD980864110
EPA REGION 6
Greene County
Paragould
Site Description
The Monroe Auto Equipment Co. (Paragould Pit) site covers 7 acres of a former sand and gravel
borrow pit that includes a 1 acre disposal area in Paragould. In 1973, the Arkansas Department
of Pollution Control gave the company temporary approval to dispose of electroplating sludges hi
the pit. Approximately 15,400 cubic yards of sludge containing iron, nickel, chromium, zinc, and
volatile organic compounds (VOCs) used as degreasers were buried between 1973 and 1978.
Testing conducted in 1987 and 1988 of on-site monitoring wells and a private drinking water well
located 300 feet downgradient of the pit, detected VOC contamination. The testing also showed
that the monitoring wells are contaminated with metals. The property is no longer operational nor
is the private well in use. Four acres of the site are surrounded by a 6-foot chain link fence with
barbed wire and a locked access gate. The area around the site is rural and lightly populated with
private residences to the south, north, and northeast. Approximately 1,000 people obtain drinking
water from private wells located within 3 miles of the site.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal and potentially responsible
parties' actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 10/26/89
Final Date: 08/30/90
Threats and Contaminants
Groundwater and soils are contaminated with VOCs and metals such as chromium and
lead. Approximately 15,000 cubic yards of electroplating sludges are buried on site.
People who come into direct contact with or accidentally ingest contaminated
groundwater or soil may be at risk.
July 1995
-------
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in a long-term remedial phase focusing on the entire site.
Response Action Status
Entire Site: In 1989, an initial study was conducted and identified groundwater
contamination on site and well contamination 300 feet off site. There is, however, no
threat of contact with the contaminated water. An investigation to determine the nature
and extent of groundwater, surface water, and soil contamination began in 1991. The study will
result in the identification of cleanup options for the site. The investigation is scheduled to be
completed in 1995.
Site Facts: In March 1991, the EPA sent a Special Notice letter to the potentially responsible
parties. In June 1991, an Administrative Order on Consent was signed requiring Monroe Auto
Equipment to perform the site investigation.
Environmental Progress
The EPA conducted initial investigations and determined that the site does not pose an immediate
threat to area residents. The EPA has determined that no interim actions are required while an
investigation is underway at the Monroe Auto Equipment Co. site to identify final cleanup
remedies.
Site Repository
Northeast Arkansas Regional Library, Green County Library, 120 North 12th Street, Paragould,
AR 72450
July 1995
MONROE AUTO EQUIPMENT CO.
(PARAGOULD PIT)
-------
POPILE, INC
ARKANSAS
EPA ID# ARD0080525
EPA REGION 6
Union County
El Dorado
Site Description
The Popile, Inc. is a 40-acre site on the east side of Southfield Road 1/4 of a mile before the
intersection of U.S. Highway 82. The property is bordered by the CRI&P Railroad on the east
and Bayou de Loutre, a perennial creek, on the north. A woodland area is located to the south,
upgradient to the site, and wetlands are located 1 mile downstream, extending about 14 stream
miles. The Bayou de Loutre, a commonly used fishing area, and a downstream boat ramp receive
drainage from the site. In 1947, El Dorado Creosote Co., the parent company of Popile, Inc.,
began treating wood at the 40-acre property using pentachlorophenol (PCP) and creosote. El
Dorado Pole & Piling Company purchased the property in 1956 and began using three surface
impoundments as part of the waste water treatment process in 1976. The wood treatment
operations ceased in July 1982. In September 1982, Popile bought approximately 7 1/2 acres of
the property including the surface impoundments and a large area known as the Salt Flat. In
1984, Popile closed the three impoundments. The El Dorado Aquifer, located between 700 and
1,000 feet below the surface, services an estimated 26,300 people. The City of El Dorado obtains
its drinking water from this source from public and private wells located within 4 miles of the
site. The nearest well is located within 1 mile of the site. The shallow groundwater is primarily
used for commercial livestock watering.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal actions.
NPL Listing History
Proposed Date: 02/07/92
Final Date: 10/14/92
Threats and Contaminants
On-site soil, groundwater, and sediments collected off site, where site drainage enters
Bayou de Loutre, are contaminated with volatile organic compounds (VOCs), various
creosotes including PCPs, and other chemicals associated with the wood-treatment
process. Exposure to contaminants in soil and sediments could pose a health risk.
July 1995
-------
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in two phases: immediate actions and a long-term remedial phase
focusing on the cleanup of the entire site.
Response Action Status
Immediate Actions: From the fall of 1990 to mid-1991, the EPA removed 66,000
cubic yards of contaminated soil and placed them in a temporary holding cell on site.
The EPA also conducted site stabilization activities such as grading and shading the
site for erosion control, capping the temporary impoundment area, installing steel culverts in a
drainage area, covering and seeding the entire area, installing a security fence, and posting
warning signs. The EPA also addressed the leaking contaminants from the closed impoundments,
the wood-treatment facility, a nearby impoundment that collects surface water drainage from the
treatment area, and the Salt Flat.
Entire Site: The EPA conducted an initial analysis in October of 1989, which
identified contaminants in the on-site soil. An investigation began in 1991 to
determine the nature and extent of the contaminated soil on site. In 1992, the EPA
completed the investigation and identified alternatives for final cleanup. The following two
cleanup alternatives were selected: extraction and treatment of the groundwater, and either
capping of the moderately contaminated soils or on-site incineration and biological treatment of
the contaminated soils. Design of the selected remedy began in early 1992 and construction
began in 1994.
Site Facts: The site was chosen to be addressed as a pilot project to demonstrate ways to
accelerate the final cleanup process.
Environmental Progress
The removal of waste materials and the measures taken to address the leaking contaminants have
reduced potential human health and safety risks while construction of the remedies is underway at
the Popile, Inc. site.
Site Repository [
Barton Public Library
July 1995 2 POPILE, INC.
-------
ROGERS RO
MUNICIPAL L
ARKANSAS
EPA ID# ARD981055809
EPA REGION 6
Pulaski County
Rogers Road, east of Jacksonville
Site Description
The Rogers Road Landfill is a 10-acre site that was purchased by the City of Jacksonville in 1953
and operated as a municipal landfill. The landfill accepted industrial and chemical waste in
addition to municipal waste. The landfill closed in 1974 when the Arkansas Department of
Pollution Control and Ecology turned down an application for a permit due to high water levels
and poor drainage. The site is located 1/2 mile to the west of the Jacksonville Municipal Landfill,
which also has been listed on the NPL. The area surrounding the site is heavily wooded and the
site itself is overgrown with vegetation. In 1985, the EPA inspected the site and found
approximately 30 deteriorating drums, which gave off a strong chemical odor. Contaminated soils
were found around the drums and lagoons, as well as the runoff paths. The landfill has no liner,
and drainage is poor, allowing water to collect. The groundwater is shallow, at a depth of 5 feet.
Wastes were deposited as deep as 20 feet below the surface. An estimated 10,000 people draw
drinking water from public and private wells are located within 3 miles of the site. The closest
private well is located 2,640 feet from the site.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal, municipal, and potentially
responsible parties' actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 01/22/87
Final Date: 07/22/87
Threats and Contaminants
On-site soil and the waste sludge from drums are contaminated with herbicides,
pesticides including dieldrin, dioxin, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), and
trichloroethene. The potential exists for contamination of an aquifer used as a drinking
water supply. People who come into direct contact with or accidentally ingest
contaminated soils on site may be at risk. Sampling has shown that the contamination
has not migrated off site.
July 1995
-------
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in two stages: an immediate action and a long-term remedial phase
focusing on the cleanup of the entire site.
Response Action Status
Immediate Action: In 1986, the City of Jacksonville fenced the site to prevent
public access.
Entire Site: In 1990, the EPA chose a remedy to clean up the contamination at the
site, that includes thermal treatment and ash disposal at the Vertac Chemical
Corporation, capping of residual waste on site, long-term groundwater monitoring,
and site maintenance. Design of a grading system was completed in 1993. Approximately 200
cubic yards of contaminated soil and 38 drums of hazardous material were excavated in 1994.
The City of Jacksonville will conduct groundwater monitoring and site operation and maintenance
activities until at least 1999.
Environmental Progress
Installation of a fence surrounding the site and excavation of all hazardous substances have
eliminated potential health risks at the Rogers Road Landfill site while operation and maintenance
activities are underway.
Site Repository
Jacksonville City Hall, 1 Industrial Drive, Jacksonville, AR 72076
July 1995
ROGERS ROAD MUNICIPAL LANDFILL
-------
SOUTH 8T
LANDFILL
ARKANSAS
EPA ID# ARD980496
Site Description
EPA REGION 6
Crittenden County
West Memphis
Other Names:
West Memphis Landfill
The South 8th Street Landfill is a 30-acre fresh water wetland located in a mixed industrial,
agricultural, and residential area along the bank of the Mississippi River. The site served as an
uncontrolled dump from the mid-1950s until it closed in 1979. It remained unsecured and illicit
dumping continued until the site was fenced in 1992. South 8th Street, the only access road from
town to the Mississippi River, runs through the site. Seven waste pits and two waste ponds are
located on site. The pits reportedly received oil and grease sludge, sewage sludge, construction
debris, chemical paint wastes, and general household wastes. No records were kept of the amount
or type of the disposed wastes. In 1981, 89 drums containing volatile organic compounds (VOCs)
were removed from the banks of the Mississippi River. Some of these drums had leaked. The site
lies within the two-year floodplain of the Mississippi River. From 1950 to 1959 the Mississippi
flooded; EPA reports show that floods in 1983, 1984, 1985, 1990, and 1991 brought hazardous
substances from the surface of one or more sources at the site into direct contact with the waters
of the Mississippi River. The Mississippi River is used for commercial fishing. The Ensley Bar,
a recognized habitat for an endangered species, is located approximately 4 miles downstream
from the site. Five municipal wells located within 4 miles of the site, including a Wellhead
Protection Area designated under the Safe Drinking Water Act, provide drinking water to an
estimated 28,000 people. The wells draw from the Wilcox Aquifer approximately 1,300 feet
below the surface. Groundwater is used for preparing soft drinks. An estimated 30,400 people
live within 4 miles of the site; an operating recreational vehicle park is adjacent to the site.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal and potentially responsible
parties' actions.
NPL Listing History
Proposed Date: 02/07/92
Final Date: 10/14/92
Threats and Contaminants
On-site pits are contaminated with dioxin, VOCs, pesticides, polychlorinated biphenyls
(PCBs), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and heavy metals. On-site ambient
air contains VOCs. Possible threats include inhaling contaminated air or ingesting
contaminated fish caught in the Mississippi River. Small mammals and the red-
shouldered hawk living at the site are threatened by contaminants.
August 1995
-------
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in two stages: initial actions and a long-term remedial phase focusing
on cleanup of the entire site.
Response Action Status
Initial Actions: In 1981, 89 drums were removed from the banks of the Mississippi
River. In the summer of 1992, the potentially responsible parties erected a fence to
secure the site from continued public access. In the fall of 1992, the EPA built a
Entire Site: EPA conducted sampling of the waste pits in October of 1988. The
results of this study indicated that on-site sources were carrying contamination to the
Mississippi River during floods. The EPA initiated an investigation in mid-1992 to
determine the nature and extent of contamination at the site. The investigation was completed in
1993. The final cleanup remedy, selected in 1994, calls for on-site stabilization and off-site
disposal of pit waste, as well as a new cover for the landfill area. Design of the cleanup
remedies is underway.
Site Facts: On May 23, 1992, the EPA issued a Unilateral Administrative Order requiring the
26 potentially responsible parties to fence the site to limit public access and to investigate the
largest pit on the site to determine whether it can be addressed in an expedited cleanup. The
potentially responsible parties rejected an offer from the EPA to perform formal site
investigations. This site was selected as a Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM)
project site. Under SACM, site assessment activities are undertaken to support both early and
long-term cleanup actions. Site conditions and their associated risks are assessed continuously
until all necessary data are collected to screen the site or support any needed response actions.
Response actions are initiated once evidence indicates that early action is warranted. Under
SACM, the public is notified early on of the potentially hazardous conditions at the site. The
EPA also gives early notification to polluters of their potential liability for conducting or paying
for cleanup activities.
Environmental Progress
The construction of a fence to limit public access to the site and the removal of the drums
containing hazardous substances from the banks of the Mississippi River have reduced the
potential health and safety risks while designs of the final cleanup remedies are underway.
Site Repository
West Memphis Public Library
August 1995 2 SOUTH 8TH STREET LANDFILL
-------
VERTAC, IN
ARKANSAS
EPA ID# ARD00002344
EPA REGION 6
Pulaski County
Western edge of Jacksonville,
1 5 miles northeast of Little Rock
Site Description
Since 1948, pesticides were manufactured at the 92-acre Vertac, Inc. site. Agent Orange was
produced on site beginning in 1961. The facility ceased operations in 1986. The abandoned
manufacturing facility includes a number of tanks, buildings, and contaminated soil and
groundwater. Two landfill areas on site were contaminated by past owners using them for
disposal of wastes. Dioxin-contaminated wastewater from this facility contaminated three
discharge areas, including the Rocky Branch Creek, the Old Waste Water Treatment Plant, and
the West Waste Water Treatment Plant. The wastewater collection lines and treatment plants and
off-site soils and sediments of rocky Branch Creek all contain measurable levels of dioxin.
Inadequate waste disposal methods and production controls also resulted in soil and surface water
contamination by insecticides, herbicides, and chlorinated phenols. The site's surface is drained
by Rocky Branch Creek, to Bayou Meto, and to the Arkansas River. Contamination has been
documented by the U.S. Department of Interior in Bayou Meto, which passes through the
Arkansas Bayou Meto Wildlife Management Area, including contaminants such as dioxin,
pesticides, and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). The nearest residences are to the south of the
site.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal, State, and potentially
responsible parties' actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 10/23/81
Final Date: 09/08/83
Threats and Contaminants
The on-site and off-site soil and on-site groundwater are contaminated with
insecticides, herbicides, chlorinated phenols, chlorinated benzene, and dioxin from
past disposal activities at the site. Fish in the Rocky Branch Creek and Bayou Meto
contain dioxin above the Food and Drug Administration alert levels for dioxin. A
fishing ban is in effect. Possible health hazards include accidental ingestion of or
direct contact with contaminants.
August 1 995
-------
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in six stages: immediate actions and five long-term remedial phases
focusing on cleanup of the landfill area, off-site areas, groundwater and soil, disposal of barrels
of waste, and storage tanks and buildings.
Response Action Status
Immediate Actions: In 1986, under an Administrative Order issued by the EPA,
the parties potentially responsible for the site contamination installed a fence around
Rocky Branch, which is located near the site. The EPA re-barreled (overpacked) the
drummed wastes on site to prevent further leakage and, in 1988, again under EPA orders, the
potentially responsible parties removed soil from contaminated residential areas. The overpacking
of approximately 28,500 corroded drums was completed in 1993. The State conducts monthly
inspections to ensure that the site remains stable.
Landfill Area: In 1983, the EPA, the State, and the Department of Justice asked the
potentially responsible parties to investigate site contamination and cleanup the landfill
area. The remedies selected included construction of a slurry wall and french drain
system to prevent the spread of contaminants, repair of existing clay caps over covered areas of
the landfill, and closure of a cooling water pond. The potentially responsible parties completed
the design of the remedies in 1984, and completed the construction of the selected remedies in
1986.
Off-Site Areas: In 1990, the EPA completed an investigation into the nature and
extent of contamination in off-site areas. A final cleanup remedy was selected that
entails demolition of the old treatment plant, the west treatment plant, and the aeration
basin and dikes, covering the area with 12 inches of clean soil, and incineration of flood plain
soils and Rocky Branch Creek sediments. Design of the remedy was completed in 1994 and
construction of the selected remedies is scheduled for completion in 1996.
Groundwater and Soil: A potentially responsible party is investigating the nature
and extent of groundwater and surface soil contamination at the site. Completion of
the investigation is expected in 1995.
Barrels of Waste: The State of Arkansas evaluated various methods of disposal of
the 30,000 barrels of waste and contracted for the waste to be incinerated on site. The
EPA is providing support services for the project including air monitoring, ash
disposal, and delivery of the drums to the incinerator. The incineration process was completed in
late 1993.
August 1995 2 VERTAC, INC.
-------
Storage Tanks and Buildings: A potentially responsible party conducted an
investigation into the nature and extent of contamination of on-site aboveground
storage tanks and their contents, various buildings, and contaminated debris left on
site. The study was completed in 1993 when a final cleanup remedy was selected. The remedy
calls for: demolishing contaminated buildings; pumping out contaminated solvents and flammable
liquids from storage tanks and incinerating them off site; cleaning, crushing, and landfilling the
tanks; consolidating palets contaminated by the drums and other debris and incinerating them;
and recycling materials whenever possible. Design of the selected remedy is scheduled for
completion in early 1996.
Site Facts: In 1983, the EPA, the State of Arkansas, and the Department of Justice negotiated a
Consent Decree with Vertac, Inc., requiring the company to conduct a site investigation and to
perform cleanup activities. In 1989, the EPA and Hercules, Inc., one of the former owners,
signed an Administrative Order, under which Hercules would perform an on-site study to
determine the nature and extent of site contamination. In 1988, Hercules removed contaminated
soil from residential areas under an Administrative Order. Greenpeace and the Government
Accountability Project have sued EPA, the state, and the construction contractors to halt the
incineration of drummed wastes.
Environmental Progress
Numerous cleanup actions have reduced the spread of contaminants and the threat of exposure to
dioxin wastes from the tanks and drums on site. The Vertac, Inc. site is safer while further
investigations and current cleanup actions continue.
Site Repository
Jacksonville City Hall, 1 Industrial Drive, Jacksonville, AR 72076
VERTAC, INC.
August 1 995
------- |