United States
          Environmental Protection
          Agency
             Great Lakes National
             Program Office
             536 South Clark Street
             Chicago, Illinois 60605
EPA-905/4-84-007
November 1984
vvEPA
Lake  Erie Water Quality
1970-1982:
A Management
Assessment

-------
                                   EPA-905/4-84-007
                                   November 1984
 Lake Erie Water Quality 1970-1982:
      A Manaqement Assessment
                 by
       Charles E. Herdendorf
Lake Erie Technical Assessment Team
    The Ohio State University

 Center for Lake Erie Area Research
          Project Officer
         David C. Rockwell
                for
GREAT LAKES NATIONAL PROGRAM OFFICE
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
       536 SOUTH CLARK STREET
      CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60605
             June 1983

-------
                                   PREFACE
      Lake Erie has experienced several  decades of accelerated eutrophication and
toxic substances contamination.  During the  latter part of the 1960s remedial actions
were planned  and  by the latter part  of the  1970s, many of the plans  were at least
partially implemented.  The first signs  of  lake recovery  are  now being  observed
through comprehensive monitoring programs.  The intent of this report  is to  highlight
the findings and conclusions of the 1978-1979 Lake Erie Intensive Study by placing
them in perspective with earlier investigations and subsequent monitoring data from
1980  to  1982, where  available.   The primary purpose  of this report is to provide
management information in the form of a review of the lake's status and its trends and
in the form of recommendations to ensure  continued improvements in the quality of its
waters and biota.   For more detailed discussions of the methods, quality assurance
procedures,  and results of the study, the reader is referred to the final  project report
of the Lake Erie  Technical Team,  "Lake Erie  Intensive Study  1978-1979  — Final
Report," edited by David E. Rathke.

      I would like to acknowledge the excellent cooperation of the many investigators
who   participated  in  the  Lake  Erie Intensive  Study  and  thank them for  their
contributions in the form of reports, data and  helpful suggestions. I am particularly
grateful for the assistance of Laura Fay, David  Rathke, Gary Arico, Yu-Chang Wu,
Cyndi Busic and Ginger-lyn Summer in the  preparation of  this report.
                                       Charles E. Herdendorf, Chairman
                                       Lake Erie Technical Assessment Team


-------
                            TABLE OF CONTENTS
Preface                                                                    i
Introduction                                                                I
Physical Characteristics of Lake Erie                                          3
     Basin Descriptions                                                     3
         Western Basin                                                     3
         Central Basin                                                      7
         Eastern Basin                                                      7
     Hydrology                                                             8
     Circulation                                                            9
Lake Erie Intensive Study                                                    11
     Organization of Data Collection and Analysis                              11
     Technical Assessment Team Participants                                24
     Study Limitations                                                     25
         Implementation of Study Plan                                       25
         Data Gaps                                                        26
         Data Compatability                                               27
Conclusions                                                               28
     Lake Enrichment                                                      28
         Lake Levels                                                      28
         Thermal Structure                                                 29
         Dissolved Oxygen                                                 44
         Clarity                                                          50
         Dissolved Substances                                              56
         Nutrients                                                        61
         Chlorophyll and Algal Biomass                                      82
         Nearshore and Open Lake Trends                         -          93
     Toxic Substances                                                      99
     Public Health                                                        103
     Land Use Activities                                                  105
                                     -11-

-------
     Lake Response to Remedial Actions                                     107
         Nature of Remedial Actions                                       108
         Positive Responses                                               109
             Lake Levels                                                 110
             Dissolved Substances                                          110
             Phosphorus Loading                                           110
             Phosphorus Concentrations                                     111
             Hypolimnion Oxygen                                          111
             Toxic Metals and Organic Compounds                           112
             Algal Density and Composition                                 112
             Benthic Communities                                         113
             Fishery                                                     114
             Bathing Beaches                                              114
         Continuing and Emerging Problems                                 114
Recommendations                                                         120
     Surveillance                                                         120
     Remedial Actions                                                     122
     Evaluation                                                           122
     Special Studies                                                       123

References                                                               124

Appendix
     A. Lake Erie Intensive Study Reports Prepared by the Lake Erie
         Assessment Team                                                129
     B. Lake Erie Intensive Study Reports Contributed to the Lake Erie
         Technical Assessment Team                                       131
     C.  Reports Received by the Lake Erie Technical Assessment Team
         As Source Documents for the Management Report                    138
                                   -in-

-------
                               LIST OF FIGURES
                                                                          Page

 1.   Lake Erie Bathymetry (Depth in Meters)                                  4
 2.   Lake Erie Nearshore Reaches and Main Lake Basins                        5
 3.   Lake Erie Intensive Study Station Plan                                   21
 4.   Lake Erie Intensive Study Cruise Schedule                                22
 5.   Lake Erie Hypolimnion Thickness — Central Basin                         33
 6.   Lake Erie Hypolimnion Temperature -- Central Basin                      38
 7.   Lake Erie Hypolimnion Dissolved Oxygen — Central Basin                 39
 8.   Lake Erie Hypolimnion — Mean Annual Trends in Thickness and
     Area for Central Basin (1970-1982)                                      40
 9.   Lake Erie Hypolimnion — Mean Annual Trends in Temperature
     and Dissolved Oxygen for Central Basin (1970-1982)                       41
10.  Lake Erie Thermal Structure — Mean Annual Trend in Limnion
     Thicknesses for Central Basin (1970-1982)                                43
11.  Distribution of Dissolved Oxygen in Lake Erie — Central
     Basin Hypolimnion (1981)                                               45
12.  Lake Erie Hypolimnion Oxygen Demand — Central Basin                  49
13.  Lake Erie Hypolimnion Oxygen Demand — Seasonal Depletion
     Rates for Central Basin (1970-1982)                                     51
14.  Distribution of Anoxia in Lake Erie (1930-1982)                           52
15.  Lake Erie Hypolimnion — Area of Anoxia for Central Basin
     (1930-1982)                                                           54
16.  Lake Erie Summer Secchi Disk Transparency — Western Basin              57
17.  Lake Erie Summer Secchi Disk Transparency — Central Basin              58
18.  Lake Erie Specific Conductance —  Central Basin                          59
19.  Distribution of Major Dissolved Solids in Lake Erie                        60
20.  Trends in Lake Erie Specific Conductance and Chloride
     Concentration — Central Basin                                          62
21.  Lake Erie Total Phosphorus Concentration — Western Basin               64
22.  Lake Erie Total Phosphorus Concentration — Central Basin                65
23.  Lake Erie Total Phosphorus Concentration — Eastern Basin                66
                                   -iv-

-------
                                                                           Page

24.   Distribution Total Phosphorus in Lake Erie — Western Basin                68
25.   Distribution Total Phosphorus in Lake Erie — Central and
      Eastern Basins                                                         69
26.   Mean Nearshore Concentration of Phosphorus in Lake Erie
      (1978-1979)                                                            72
27.   Comparison of Total Phosphorus Loading Estimates to Lake Erie            73
28.   Comparison of Detroit River Total Phosphorus Loading
      Estimates to Lake Erie                                                 74
29.   Lake Erie Total Phosphorus Concentration — Early Summer
      Epilimnion for Central Basin                                             75
30.   Phosphorus Quantities in Lake Erie — Central Basin                        76
31.   Lake Erie Total Phosphorus Concentration — Western
      Basin Ontario Nearshore Trend                                           77
32.   Lake Erie Nitrate + Nitrite Concentration — Western Basin                 80
33.   Lake Erie Nitrate + Nitrite Concentration — Central Basin                 81
34.   Lake Erie Chlorophyll a Concentration —  Western Basin                    84
35.   Lake Erie Chlorophyll a Concentration —•  Central Basin                     85
36.   Lake Erie Chlorophyll a Concentration —  Eastern Basin                     86
37.   Distribution of Chlorophyll a in Lake Erie — Western Basin                 87
38.   Distribution of Chlorophyll a in Lake Erie — Central and
      Eastern Basins                                                         88
39.   Mean Nearshore Concentration of Chlorophyll a in Lake Erie
      (1978-1979)                                                            90
40.   Chlorophyll a Quantities in Lake Erie — Central Basin                      91
41.   Comparison of Mercury Concentration in Lake Erie Sediments
      for 1970 and 1979                                                      100
                                     -v-

-------
                              LIST OF TABLES
 I.   Morphometry of Lake Erie Basins                                        6
 2.   Organizations Participating inthe Lake Erie Intensive Study                12
 3.   Major Components of the Lake Erie Intensive Study                       16
 4.   Parameters Measured for the Lake Erie Intensive Study                    19
 5.   Lake Erie Central Basin Thermal Structure                               30
 6.   Lake Erie Central Basin Hypolimnion Area                               31
 7.   Lake Erie Central Basin Hypolimnion Thickness, Temperature
     and Dissolved Oxygen                                                  34
 8.   Lake Erie Central Basin Hypolimnion Characteristics                      35
 9.   Annual Mean Trends in Lake Erie Central Basin Hypolimnion
     Characteristics (1970-1982)                                             37
10.   Lake Erie Central Basin Hypolimnetic Oxygen Demand                    47
11.   Trends in Net Oxygen Demand of the Central and Eastern
     Basin Hypolimnions of Lake Erie (1930-1982)                             48
12.   Estimated Area of the Anoxic Hypolimnion of the Central
     Basin of Lake Erie (1930-1982)                                          53
13.   Lake Erie Summer Secchi Disk Transparency                             55
14.   Lake Erie Total Phosphorus Concentrations                               63
15.   Estimates of Total Phosphorus Loading to Lake Erie                       70
16.   Lake Erie Nitrate + Nitrite Concentrations                               79
17.   Lake Erie Chlorophyll a Concentrations                                  83
18.   Violations of Lake Erie Water Quality Objectives                         116
                                     -vi-

-------
                                INTRODUCTION
      Lake Erie, as one of the Great Lakes of North America, represents a significant
source of fresh surface  water for the people of Canada and the United States.  In
recognition of the importance of this resource and the need to restore and maintain its
water quality, the Canadian and  United  States  governments entered into the Great
Lakes Water Quality Agreement in 1972.  The Agreement was reaffirmed in 1978 and
stipulated  further actions  to  enhance  water  quality  in  the Great  Lakes  Basin
ecosystem.

      Both  governments  mandated the International Joint Commission (I3C) for the
task of coordinating the implementation of the Agreement.  Recognizing the need for
a uniform surveillance effort by both parties of the agreements and the cooperating
state and provincial jurisdictions, the IJC formed and directed the Water Quality
Board to develop an international surveillance plan.  Work groups were established for
each lake, with the responsibility for developing detailed plans.

      The Lake Erie Work Group prepared a nine-year surveillance plan in 1977, which
was designed to provide an understanding of  the  overall,  long-range responses of the
lake to pollution  abatement efforts.  This plan was eventually incorporated as part of
the Great Lakes International Surveillance Plan (GLISP) developed by the Surveillance
Subcommittee of the Water Quality Board. The general objectives established for this
plan included:

      1.  To search for, monitor, and quantify violations of the existing  Agreement
         objectives (general  and specific),  the IJC recommended objectives, and
         jurisdictional standards, criteria and objectives.  Quantification will be in
         terms of severity, areal  or volume extent, frequency, and duration, and will
         include sources.

      2.  To monitor local and whole lake response to abatement measures and  to
         identify emerging problems.
                                      -1-

-------
      3.   To determine the cause-effect relationship between water quality and inputs
          in  order   to   develop  appropriate   remedial/preventative   actions   and
          predictions  of  the  rate  and  extent  of  local/whole  lake   responses  to
          alternative abatement proposals.

Within the context of these general objectives and considering the key issues specific
to Lake Erie, the surveillance plan for Lake Erie additionally focused on:

      1.   Determining the long-term trophic state  of  the  lake  and to what degree
          remedial measures have affected improvements.

      2.   Assessing the presence, distribution, and impact of toxic substances.

      3.   Providing  information  to indicate the requirements for  and direction of
          additional remedial programs, if necessary, to  protect water uses.

      The Lake Erie  plan called for a two-year Intensive Study of  main lake, nearshore
and  tributary conditions (1978 and  1979),  followed by  seven years  of  main  lake
monitoring  (1980-1986),  and  then a  repeat of the nine-year cycle.   The overall
objective of the Intensive Study was to provide information  for a detailed assessment
of inputs to the lake and the  current condition of the lake.  The intensive study was
also  designed to identify emerging problem areas, to detect changes in water quality
on a broad geographic basis, and to provide information necessary for trend  analyses.
The  study plan considered the seasonal nature of tributary inputs, lake  circulation
patterns,  and  nearshore-offshore gradients.  The plan stressed linkages between the
various components  of the study in order  to permit an adequate "whole lake" water
quality assessment.

      The following  report highlights the  findings and  conclusions of the 1978-1979
Intensive  Study.  These results are placed  in perspective with earlier investigations,
particularly those since  Project  Hypo in 1970, and  subsequent monitoring programs
through 1982.
                                       -2-

-------
                  PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF LAKE ERIE
Basin Descriptions
      Lake Erie is one of the largest lakes in the world, ranking thirteenth by area and
eighteenth by volume (Herdendorf  1982).  It  is the southernmost of the Laurentian
Great Lakes,  lying between 4I°2I'N and 42°50'N latitude and 78°50'W  and 83°30'W
longitude.  The lake is narrow and relatively shallow for  a lake of its size (Figure I),
with its longitudinal axis oriented east-northeast.  Lake Erie is approximately 388 km
long and 92 km wide, with a mean  depth of 19 m  and a  maximum sounding of  64 m.
                                      7                    3
The lake has a surface area of 25,657 km , a volume of 484 km , a shoreline length of
1,380 km, and a surface  elevation of 174 m above mean sea level.

      Lake Erie can be naturally divided, on the basis of bathymetry, into  three basins:
western, central and eastern (Figure 2). The major morphometric dimensions of each
basin  and the entire lake are given in Table  I.

      Western  Basin.  The western basin, lying west of a line from the  tip of Pelee
Point, Ontario, to Cedar Point, Ohio, is the smallest and the shallowest with most of
the bottom at depths between 7 and 10 meters. In contrast with the other two basins,
a number of bedrock islands and shoals are situated in the western basin and form a
partial divide  between  it and  the central basin.  Topographically, the bottom is
monotonously  flat, except for the sharply rising islands and  shoals in the central and
eastern parts.  The maximum depths in the basin are found in the interisland channels.
The deepest sounding', 19 meters, was made in a small depression north of Starve Island
Reef; south of Gull Island Shoal, in  another depression, a depth of 16 meters has been
recorded. Elsewhere in the basin these depths are not approached.

     The waters of the  western basin are more turbid  than the other basins because of
large sediment loads from the Detroit, Maumee and Portage  rivers, wave  resuspension
of silts and clays from  the bottom, and high  algal productivity.   The Detroit River
accounts for over 90 percent  of the flow of water  into Lake  Erie  and therefore
controls  the circulation  patterns  in  the  western part of the basin.   Its  inflow
                                    -3-

-------
                                                                        81*
-P-
I
                        -43"
                           OCTMMT
                        •42'
                                                                                                                 43--
                                   8T
                                                      8T
                                                                         81'
                                                                                            80*
                                        FIGURE  1.   LAKE ERIE  BATHYMETRY  (depth in meters)^,

-------
              20   0
               I....I....I
i
Ui
                              /1



                             Sanidusky
                         FIGURE 2.   LAKE ERIE  NEARSHORE REACHES AND MAIN LAKE BASINS

-------
            TABLE 1



MORPHOMETRY OF LAKE ERIE BASINS
Dimension
Maximum Length (km)
Maximum Breadth (km)
Maximum Depth (m)
Mean Depth (m)
Area (km2) 3
Volume (km )
Shoreline Length (km)
Percent of Area (%}
Percent of Volume (%}
Percent of Shoreline (%}
Development of Volume (ratio)
Development of Shoreline (ratio)
Water Storage Capacity (days)
p
Drainage Basin Land (km )
Mean Elevation (m)
Highest Monthly Mean Elevation (m)
Lowest Monthly Mean Elevation (m)
Mean Outflow (m/sec)
Highest Mean Monthly Outflow (m/sec)
Lowest Mean Monthly Outflow (m/sec)
Western
Basin
80
64
18.9
7.4
,284 16
25
438
12.8
5.1
31.7
1.2
2.3
51
—
—
—
—
—
—
Central
Basin
212
92
25.6
18.5
,138
305
512
62.9
63.0
37.1
2.2
1.3
635
—
—
—
—
—
—
Eastern
Basin
186
76
64.0
24.4
6,235
154
430
24.3
31.9
31.2
1.1
1.7
322
—
—
—
—
—
—
Entire
Lake
388
92
64.0
18.5
25,657
484
1,380
100
100
100
0.9
2.1
1,008
58,800
173.86
174.58
172.97
5,730
7,190
3,280
             -6-

-------
 penetrates far southward into the basin, retarding the dispersion of the sediment-laden
 Maumee River and the Michigan shore streams which results in high concentrations of
 contaminants along the western shore.

      The water of the western basin is normally isothermal from top to bottom.  Its
 shallowness precludes the formation  of  a permanent thermocline except in the deep
 holes. Occasionally during calm periods in the summer, the water stratifies thermally
 leading to rapid oxygen depletion near the lake bottom.

      Central Basin.  The central basin is divided from the western basin by the island
 chain and from the eastern basin by a relatively shallow sand and gravel bar between
 Erie, Pennsylania, and Long Point, Ontario.  The central  basin has an average depth of
 19  meters and a maximum depth of 26 meters.   Except for the rising slopes of a
 morainic bar extending south-southeastward from Pelee Point, Ontario, the bottom of
 the central basin is extremely flat.  This  bar forms a depression in the bottom between
 it and the islands, known as the Sandusky sub-basin (Figure 2).  This sub-basin has an
                              2
 area of approximately 1,350 km and a maximum depth of 16m.

      Although the central  basin  receives  over 95  percent  of  its inflow from the
 western basin, the  water is considerably less turbid  and  less biologically productive.
 Drainage from the  western basin and inflow  from the Sandusky River and other Ohio
 tributaries are concentrated in the Sandusky sub-basin and along the south shore  where
 biological productivity and contaminants are the highest.

      Water temperatures in the central  basin are isothermal from fall to late spring;
 thermal stratification normally occurs  below 15 meters  from June until September.
 During the later part of the stratified period the thin hypolimnion may lose all  of its
 dissolved oxygen.

     Eastern  Basin.  The eastern  basin is   relatively  deep and bowl-shaped.   A
considerable area lies below 35 meters and the deepest sounding,  64 meters, is  found
east-southeast of Long Point,  Ontario.  This basin is separated from the central basin
by a glacially deposited bar which extends from the base of Long Point on the Ontario
shore to Presque  Isle at  Erie, Pennsylvania.  The bar contains a notch, known as the
                                     -7-

-------
Pennsylvania channel, which  reaches  a depth  of over 20  meters  and provides a
subsurface connection for water circulation in both directions between the two basins.

     The eastern basin receives over 95 percent of its water supply from the central
basin, but in general it is less turbid and is the least biologically productive of all three
basins.  However, productivity is substantial along the south shore and near the mouth
of the Grand River on the north shore.

     The temperature structure of the  eastern basin  is similar to that of the deeper
Great Lakes.  It rarely freezes over (the western basin typically freezes  over each
winter and the central basin occasionally freezes from shore to shore), but it is often
covered  by  drift ice  from the other  basins.    The  summer thermocline is  thick,
approximately 10 meters, and persists from early summer to November. The depth of
the basin provides for a hypolimnion in excess of 40 meters in thickness.  Although  the
dissolved oxygen content in the hypolimnion declines in the summer, it rarely drops
below 50 percent of saturation.

Hydrology
     Approximately 90 percent of the total inflow to Lake Erie comes  from  the
Detroit River, the  drainage outlet for  Lake Huron.  The average annual inflow a
                                                                           2
measured by the U.S. Lake Survey  near the head of the Detroit River is 5,150 m /sec,
equivalent to  6.4- meters of water covering Lake Erie.  Surface  runoff  from  the
drainage area enters the  lake via many smaller tributary rivers or by direct  runoff
from the shore areas. Average annual runoff is estimated at 580 m /sec, equivalent to
0.7 meters of water over the lake's surface. The outflow from Lake Erie is through
the Niagara River  at Buffalo and the  Wei land Canal  diversion at Port Colborne.
Combined outflow ave
water over Lake Erie.
                                        2
Combined outflow averages about 5,730 m /sec annually,  equivalent to 7.1 meters of
     The average annual rainfall  in the Lake Erie Basin is about  90 cm and ranges
between 80 and 93 cm. The total land area which drains into Lake Erie, excluding that
above the mouth of the Detroit River, is only about three times the area of the water
surface of the lake.   The large expanse of water affords a great opportunity for
evaporation,  and the amount of water which has been lost is estimated to be between
                                     -8-

-------
85 and 91 cm.  This amount of evaporation is approximately equivalent to the average
annual rainfall over the lake.  During dry periods more water may be evaporated from
the lake than flows into it from all of its tributaries. Under these conditions Lake Erie
delivers  into the Niagara River a smaller quantity of water than it receives from the
Detroit River.

Circulation
      Water  movement in  the western basin of Lake Erie is  strongly influenced by
Detroit River flow.  This inflow is composed of three distinct water masses.  The mid-
channel  flow predominates and  is characterized by 1) lower temperature, 2) lower
specific  conductance,  3) greener color and higher  transparency, 4) lower phosphorus
concentration, 5) higher dissolved-oxygen content, 6) lower chloride-ion concentration,
and 7) lower turbidity than the flows on the east  and west sides of the river.  The
midchannel flow penetrates deeply into the western basin  where it mixes with other
masses and eventually flows into the central basin through Pelee Passage  and to a
lesser extent through  South Passage.  The side flows generally cling to the shoreline
and recycle in large eddy currents.

      In  the central  basin,  the  prevailing  southwest  winds are  parallel  to the
longitudinal axis of  the lake.   Because of the earth's rotation these winds generate
currents which cause a geostrophic transport of water toward the United States shore.
This convergence of water on the south shore results in a rise in lake level which  is
equalized by sinking of water along  this shore.  At the  same time the lake level  is
lowered  along the Canadian shore as surface  currents move the water offshore.  The
sinking along the south shore appears to be compensated by a subsurface movement of
water toward the north and an upwelling along the Ontario shore.

      The thermocline is approximately 10  meters shallower  adjacent to the north
shore than on the south side of the lake;  this  can  be  interpreted  as an upwelling
influenced by the prevailing southwest winds (Herdendorf  1970). The resultant surface
currents  indicate a net eastward movement,  while subsurface  readings show a slight
net westward movement.  This can be explained by the cycle of 1) surface transport of
water toward the southeast, 2) sinking of  water off  the south  shore, 3) subsurface
transport toward the north-northwest,  and  4) upwelling adjacent  to  the  north  shore.
                                    -9-

-------
The pattern of this type of circulation would be analogous to coils of a spring that
tapers toward the eastern end of the lake.

      The formation  of  a deep thermocline in the southern half of the central basin
results in a relatively thin hypolimnion which is highly susceptible to oxygen depletion
by sediments with high  oxygen demands.  These circumstances result in the presence
of anoxic bottom water  particularly in the southwestern part of the basin.

      The bottom deposits of the northern part of the central  basin are predominantly
glacial till and do not have the high oxygen demands of the clay muds  in the southern
half of the basin.  This fact, coupled with a thicker hypolimnion off the northern shore
and entrainment of eastern basin  water flowing westward  through the  Pennsylvania
channel, apparently accounts for the more abundant dissolved oxygen at the bottom.

      In the eastern basin the  thermocline over the "deep hole"  commonly forms at a
depth of  1* meters, allowing  a considerably thicker hypolimnion (40 meters) than in
the central basin.  In general,  midlake water in the central and eastern basins of Lake
Erie,  lakeward of a narrow band  of shore-influenced water,  is relatively uniform in
quality.  Some variation in the concentration of dissolved substances occurs between
the epilimnion and hypolimnion waters in these basins and is probably caused by the
high  oxygen  demand  and  the regeneration of  nutrients  from the sediments.   Most
dissolved solids showed  a marked increase from Lake St.  Clair to the Niagara River as
they pass through Lake Erie.
                                    -10-

-------
                         LAKE ERIE INTENSIVE STUDY
Organization of Data Collection and Analysis
     Field investigations for the Intensive Study were initiated in January 1978 under
the auspices of the IJC.  Approximately 25 organizations collected data relevant to
the effort (Table 2). Most  components of the plan were  implemented on schedule as
the environmental protection,  natural resource management, and scientific research
communities of  the Great  Lakes region embarked on the two-year  study (Table 3).
Planning and implementation of the study was coordinated  by the Lake  Erie  Work
Group   of   the   Surveillance   Subcommittee.    This   subcommittee  served  the
Implementation Committee of  the IJC Great Lakes Water Quality Board.  The  Lake
Erie Work  Group was charged with the  responsibility of monitoring the progress of
field investigations and preparation of  reports  which analyze the results of  these
studies, and the production of a comprehensive assessment  of the current status of
Lake Erie.

     The methods for  data collection  and sample analysis are outlined in the  Lake
Erie Surveillance Plan prepared  by the Lake  Erie  Work Group (Winklhofer  1978).
Specific  methods employed for  the Intensive Study are contained in the numerous
reports submitted by study participants (Appendix A,  B and C).  Of major importance
were  the methods used for the  main  lake  and  nearshore components; since  six
organizations were responsible for these components encompassing the entire water
mass of the lake, data compatability was essential:

     Main Lake
     1.  USEPA, Great Lakes National Program Office (USEPA/GLNPO)

     2.  National  Water  Research  Institute,  Canada  Centre for  Inland Water
         (NWRI/CCIW)
                                   -11-

-------
                                                   TABLE 2

                    ORGANIZATIONS PARTICIPATING IN THE LAKE ERIE INTENSIVE STUDY
        AGENCY OR ORGANIZATION
                RESPONSIBILITY
Canada-Federal

1.   National Water Resources Institute,
     Canada Centre for Inland Waters
     (NWRI/CCIW)

2.   Department of Fisheries and Oceans
     (DF&O)

Canada-Provincial

3.   Ontario Ministry of the Environment
     (OWE)

4.   Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources
     (MNR)

United States-Federal

5.   National Aeronautical and Space Administration,
     Lewis Research Center
     (NASA)

6.   National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
     Great Lakes Environmental Laboratory
     (NOAA/GLERL)
Central Lake Erie oxygen study;  water
circulation study; atmospheric inputs
Wildlife contaminants study
Tributary inputs; point source inputs;  water
intakes; beach surveys

Fish contamination surveys; fish stock
assessment
Remote sensing images of suspended sediment and
chlorophyll biomass; ice conditions; surface
temperature

Water levels and flows; current meter
survey/circulation patterns; nutrient models

-------
                                                    TABLE  2 (CONTINUED)
                AGENCY OR ORGANIZATION
                                                                          RESPONSIBILITY
u>
i
        7.    U.S.  Army, Corps of Engineers  Buffalo  District
             (USACOE)
 8.   U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
      Great Lakes National Program
      (USEPA/GLNPO)

 9.   U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
      Large Lakes Research Station
      (USEPA/LLRS)

10.   U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
      Region V, Eastern District Office
      (USEPA/ED)

11.   U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
      (USF&WS)

12.   U.S. Geological Survey
      (USGS)

 United States-State and County

13.   Erie County  (PA) Department of Health
      (ECDH)

14.   Michigan Department of Natural Resources
      (MDNR)
Wastewater management study; loading
calculations for tributaries and connecting
channels

Main Lake Erie monitoring, Western, Central and
Eastern basins; TAT planning
                                                                    Oxygen  and nutrient models;  fish contaminants;
                                                                    Cladophora surveys
                                                                    Logistical  support;  point source inputs;  TAT
                                                                    planning
                                                                    Fish contamination surveys;  fish stock
                                                                    assessment

                                                                    Tributary stream gauging,  flows and water
                                                                    quality
                                                                    Tributary inputs;  point source inputs; water
                                                                    intakes;  beach surveys

                                                                    Tributary inputs;  point source inputs; water
                                                                    intakes;  beach surveys; Detroit River
                                                                    discharge

-------
                                             TABLE  2 (CONTINUED)
         AGENCY OR ORGANIZATION
            RESPONSIBILITY
15.   New York State Department of Environmental
      Conservation
      (NYDEC)

16.   New York State Department of Health
      (NYDH)

17.   Ohio Department of Natural Resources
      (ODNR)

18.   Ohio Environmental Protection Agency
      (OEPA)

 United States-Municipal

19.   City of Cleveland
      Water Quality Laboratory
      (CWQL)

20.   City of Toledo, Pollution Control Agency
      (TPCA)

 United States-University

21.   Heidelberg College
      (HC)

22.   Ohio State University,
      Center for Lake Erie Area Research
      (OSU/CLEAR)
Tributary inputs; point source inputs; Niagara
River discharge
Beach surveys; water intakes
Fish stock assessment, fish kill
investigations

Tributary inputs; point source inputs; water
intakes; beach surveys
Harbor monitoring for water quality
Harbor monitoring for water quality
Central Lake Erie nearshore
Western Lake Erie nearshore; Central basin
oxygen depletion rates; Cladophora surveys;
fish contamination  survey at tributary mouths

-------
                                             TABLE 2 (CONTINUED)
         AGENCY OR ORGANIZATION                                           RESPONSIBILITY


23.   State University College of New York  at  Buffalo,       Eastern Lake Erie nearshore; Cladophora
      Great Lakes Laboratory (SUNY/GLL)                      surveys

24.   University of Toledo                                  Limnological study of Maumee River and Bay
      (UT)

 International

25.   International Joint Commission                        Quality control/assurance for measurement;
      (IJC)                                                 statistical procedures;  logistical support for
                                                            meetings  and report  preparation; final report
                                                            printing  and distribution

-------
                                 TABLE 3

        MAJOR COMPONENTS OF THE LAKE ERIE INTENSIVE STUDY
     TOPIC
         ORGANIZATION RESPONSIBLE
Main Lake

Main Lake Monitoring Report
Oxygen Studies
Sedimentation/Carbon Flux
Sediment Oxygen Demand
Lake Response to Nutrient Loading
Lake Circulation
Lake Physics Studies:
     Interbasin transfer
     Nearshore-offshore movement
     Vertical drift

Nearshore

Canadian Nearshore
Western Basin, U.S.
Central Basin, U.S.
Eastern Basin, U.S.
Cladophora
Cleveland Intakes
Toledo/Maumee Estuary
Input and Problem Areas
                         Intakes  and  Pt.
                         Intakes  and  Pt.
                         Intakes  and  Pt.
Sources
Sources
Sources
                          Intakes,  Point  Sources,   OME
NY Beaches, Tributaries,
PA Beaches, Tributaries,
OH Beaches, Tributaries,
MI Beaches, Tributaries,  Intakes,  Point Sources,
     and Detroit River
ONT Beaches, Tributaries,
     and Niagara River
Tributary, Point Sources,  and Atmospheric  Loading
Meteorological/Hydrological  Summary

Contaminants

Radioactivity
Fish Contaminants
Wildlife Contaminants
           USEPA/OSU/CLEAR
           NWRI/CCIW
           NWRI/CCIW
           USEPA/LLRS
           USEPA/LLRS
           NOAA/6LERL
           NWRI/CCIW
           OME
           OSU/CLEAR
           HC
           SUNY/6LL
           SUNY/6LL
           CWQL
           TPCA
NYDEC
ECDH
OEPA
MDNR
                                                    IJC
                                                    NOAA/GLERL
                                                    IJC
                                                    USEPA/USF&WS
                                                    DF&O
                                  -16-

-------
                          TABLE 3 (CONTINUED)
     TOPIC                                        ORGANIZATION  RESPONSIBLE
Data Quality

Data Quality Report                                 IJC
Data Management Report                              IJC
Field and Laboratory Procedures                     IJC

Special Contributions

Fish Stock Assessment                               GLFC
Remote Sensing Experiments                          NASA
Wastewater Management Study                         USACOE
Tributary and Storm Event Reports                    USGS
Phosphorus Management Study                         IJC
Primary Productivity Study                          NWRI/CCIW
                                                    OSU/CLEAR
                                 -17-

-------
      Nearshore
      1.   Ohio State University, Center for Lake Erie Area Research (OSU/CLEAR) -
          western Lake Erie, Detroit River to Huron, Ohio

      2.   Heidelberg College (HC) - central Lake Erie, Vermilion, Ohio to Ashtabula,
          Ohio

      3.   State University of New  York College at Buffalo, Great Lakes Laboratory
          (SUNY/GLL) - eastern Lake Erie, Conneaut, Ohio to Buffalo, New York

      4.   Ontario Ministry of Environment, Water Resources Branch (OME) - western
          Lake Erie, Detroit River  to Point Pelee, central Lake Erie, Point Pelee  to
          Long Point, and eastern Lake Erie, Long Point to Niagara River

      The parameters and typical methods used  for water, biological, and sediment
measurements are listed in  Table 4.  To  facilitate problem area assessment and the
determination of long-term  trends,  emphasis was placed on those parameters  subject
to non-compliance with the Water  Quality Agreement and/or  jurisdictional criteria,
standards, or guidelines. For purposes of the Intensive Study, the lake  was divided into
a series of main lake compartments and nearshore reaches (Figure 2) with a combined
station  pattern  totalling over  500  stations (Figure 3).  Cruises were scheduled  to
provide a reasonably  synoptic  view of the entire lake (Figure 4).   Data from these
cruises constitute the foundation for the whole lake assessment.

      In order to assist the Lake Erie Work Group in meeting its responsibility to bring
the general objective of the  Intensive Study to  fruition, the  Center for Lake  Erie Area
Research (CLEAR) proposed the  creation of  a  technical assessment team with
scientific and technical knowledge of Lake Erie  and report editing, research  project
administration, and data management skills.  In  March 1980, at the conclusion of the
Intensive Study field investigations, such  a team was established at  The Ohio State
University  by a grant from  the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Great Lakes
National Program Office.
                                    -18-

-------
                                     TABLE  4

         PARAMETERS MEASURED FOR THE LAKE ERIE INTENSIVE STUDY
Water Parameters

 1. Temperature
 2. Wind speed and direction
 3. Transparency, Secchi Disk (20 cm)
 4. Wave height
 5. Extinction depth
 6. Aesthetics
 7. Turbidity
 8. Suspended solids
 9. Dissolved oxygen
10. pH
11. Specific conductance
12. Alkalinity
13. Total phosphorus
14. Total dissolved phosphorus
15. Soluble reactive phosphorus
16. Total kjeldahl nitrogen
17. Ammonia
18. Nitrate & Nitrite N
19. Dissolved reactive silicate
20. Chloride
21. Sulfate
22. Calcium
23. Magensium
24. Sodium
25. Potassium
26. Aluminum, total
27. Aluminum, dissolved
28. Cadmium, total
29. Cadmium, dissolved
30. Chromium, total
31. Chromium, dissolved
32. Copper, total
33. Copper, dissolved
34. Iron, total
35. Iron, dissolved
36. Lead, total
37. Lead, dissolved
38. Manganese, total
39. Manganese, dissolved
40. Nickel, total
Biological Parameters

 1. Phytoplankton
 2. Zooplankton
 3. Chlorophyll ^
 4. Pheophytin
 5. Aerobic heterotrophs
 6. Fecal coliforms
 7. Fecal streptococci
 8. Benthos

Sediment Parameters
 1. Solids, total
 2. Solids, volatile
 3. Chemical oxygen demand
 4. Total organic carbon
 5. Total phosphorus
 6. Total kjeldahl nitrogen
 7. Ammonia nitrogen
 8. Arsenic
 9. Selenium
10. Cadmium
11. Chromium
12. Copper
13. Iron
14. Lead
15. Nickel
16. Silver
17. Zinc
18. Mercury
19. Cyanide
20. PCBs, total
21. Hexachlorobenzene
22. beta-Benzenehexachloride
23. Lindane
24. Treflan
25. Aldrin
26. Isodrin
27. Heptachlor epoxide
28. Chlordane
29. DDT and metabolites
30. Methoxychlor
                                     -19-

-------
                          TABLE 4 (CONTINUED)
Water Parameters                               Sediment  Parameters

41. Nickel, dissolved                          31.  Mirex
42. Vanadium, total                            32.  2,4-D Isopropyl  Ester
43. Vanadium, dissolved                        33.  Endosulfan  I
44. Zinc, total                                34.  Endosulfan  II
45. Zinc, dissolved                            35.  Dieldrin
46. Arsenic, total                             36.  Endrin
47. Mercury, total                             37.  Tetradifon
48. Selenium, total                            38.  Grain-size  analysis
49. Silver, total
50. Silver, dissolved
51. Cyanide
52. Phenol
53. Total organic carbon
54. Dissolved organic carbon
                                  -20-

-------
                      ONTARIO
                                                            N.Y.
           OHIO
                                                PA.

                                             LAKE  ERIE
                                         SURVEILLANCE PLAN

                                          • MAIN LAKE STATIONS

                                            NEARSHORE STATIONS
FIGURE 3.   LAKE ERIE  INTENSIVE STUDY STATION  PLAN

-------
CCIW


USEPA


GLL


HC


OSU


MOE
       I  I  III   II
       12  345   67

     III   III    III
      123    456    789
                                      1978
        1    2
      12
      I
      1  CRUISE NO.
                   11
                  I       I
"MAR TAPR  TMA?  I JUN  | JUL |  AUG  | SEPT | OCT | NOV |  DEC"
CCIW


USEPA


GLL


HC


OSU


MOE
I   I  I
             II   I  I  I    I    II1979
                2345    6    78
                I  I  II  III   I
2    34    5   6   7  8    9  10  11    12
            I    •
                     I
                     2 	
                  II
•  •
 I
"JANT FIB I MAR I  APR I  MAY  | JUN |  JUL |  AUG
                           SEPT |  OCT
                                        NOV
  FIGURE H. LAKE ERIE INTENSIVE STUDY CRUISE SCHEDULE
                  -22-

-------
     The Lake Erie Technical Assessment Team. (TAT) was thus formed to synthesize
data from the diverse groups into a unified whole lake assessment.  TAT functioned to
provide  a scientific  focus  for  coordination  and  cooperation,  for promotion of
information exchange, and for creation of an atmosphere in which a consensus could be
reached on technical matters.  Specific objectives of TAT included:

     1.   To provide professional supervision and  a pool of scientific and technical
          skills  to supplement  the  international  scientific staff  involved  in   the
          intensive study.

     2.   To coordinate and guide, essentially on a daily basis, efforts of the  various
          contributing scientists.

     3.   To exercise technical  review and editorial responsibilities for the individual
          reports.

     ^.   To perform an  in-depth and integrated  analysis of the data base  for  the
          purpose of a comprehensive assessment.

     5.   To  assure that  all  pertinent  baseline data resulting from Canadian  and
          United States  sources are entered  in  STORET  for  the  purpose  of  this
          assessment and future  analysis.

     6.   To  exercise the aforementioned functions towards aggregating all Canadian
          and United States elements  of the  intensive  study  to  produce a  timely,
          unified whole lake report which  will:

          a.   determine the status of  the open water and nearshore areas of Lake
              Erie in terms of

              1)   trophic level,
              2)   toxic substances burden,
              3)   pathogenic bacteria contamination,
              ^)   suspended materials load, and
              5)   oxygen demand;
                                    -23-

-------
         b.   provide baseline  data  for the chemical, microbiological, and physical
              parameters of water  quality against which  future  changes may be
              judged;

         c.   compare the  present data with past data in order  to  determine how
              rapidly and in what manner the lake is changing;

         d.   determine  how these changes are related to waste reduction, pollutant
              bans, nutrient control programs, and pollution abatement programs; and

         e.   prepare  recommendations concerning  the  scope of future remedial
              programs to enhance or maintain current lake water quality.

Technical Assessment Team Participants
     The Lake Erie TAT consisted of a technical  staff headquartered at The  Ohio
State University and a select group of Canadian and United  States scientists who
contributed data, technical reports and guidance to the effort.  The individuals listed
below participated in the  assessment undertaken by the Lake Erie TAT:

     Technical Staff
     1.  Charles E. Herdendorf, Chairman
     2.  C. Lawrence Cooper, Coordinator
     3.  David E. Rathke, Editor
     4.  Laura A. Fay
     5.  3ohn J. Mizera
     6.  Mark D. Barnes
     7.  R. Peter Richards
     8.  Gary Arico

     Contributors
      1.  Carl Baker - Ohio Department of  Natural Resources
      2.  David Baker - Heidelberg College
      3.  Robert Bowden - USEPA, Great Lakes National Program
                                   -24-

-------
      4.  Farrell Boyce - Canada Centre for Inland Waters
      5.  Noel Burns - Canada Centre for Inland Waters
      6.  Murray Charlton - Canada Centre for Inland Waters
      7.  James Clark, USEPA, Great Lakes National Program
      8.  John Clark - International Joint Commission, GLRO
      9.  David DeVault - USEPA, Great Lakes National Program
      10.  Clay Edwards - International Joint Commission,  GLRO
      11.  Andrew Fraser - Canada Centre for Inland Waters
      12.  V. Ray Fredrick - SUNY, Great Lakes Laboratory
      13.  Douglas Haffner - International Joint Commission, GLRO
      14.  Douglas Hallett - Canada Wildlife Service
      15.  Yousry Hamdy - Ontario Ministry of the Environment
      16.  David Rockwell - USEPA, Great Lakes National  Program
      17.  Fernando Rosa - Canada Centre for Inland Waters
      18.  Robert Sweeney - SUNY, Great Lakes Laboratory
      19.  Nelson Thomas - USEPA, Large Lakes Research  Station
      20.  Richard Thomas - Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Canada Centre for
          Inland Waters
      21.  Joseph Vihtelic - Michigan Department  of Natural Resources
      22.  Lester Walters - Bowling Green State University
      23.  Robert Wellington - Erie County Department of  Health, Pennsylvania
      24.  Richard Winklhofer - USEPA, Region V, Eastern  District
      25.  Stanley Witt - USEPA, Great Lakes National Program
      26.  Stephen Yaksich - U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Buffalo District

Appendix A lists the  reports prepared by the Lake Erie Technical Assessment Team,
Appendix  B lists reports contributed to  the Lake  Erie Intensive Study by  other
investigators, and Appendix C lists the basic documents used by TAT to prepare this
report.

Study Limitations
      Implementation of study plan.  The study plan developed by the Lake Erie Work
Group was implemented in most details and on schedule.  Notable  exceptions to
complete implementation included:
                                  -25-

-------
      1.   Atmospheric loadings were not determined during the study period.

      2.   United States nearshore surveys were conducted for three consecutive days
          rather than five consecutive days specified in the plan.

      3.   Canadian nearshore surveys were  not comprehensive for the entire shore,
          but localized in problem areas due  to the availability of comprehensive data
          from earlier studies.

      k.   Soluble nutrients  were not included in the eastern United States nearshore
          cruises.

      5.   Electronic bathythermograph (EBT) recordings  for depth greater  than 10
          meters were not included in central United States nearshore cruises.

      6.   Samples for benthos and toxic organic compounds in main lake sediments
          were not obtained.

      7.   Radiological data was not  collected, except in the  vicinity of the Davis-
          Besse Nuclear Power Station near Port Clinton, Ohio.

      Data gaps.  In  addition to  the loss of data due to incomplete implementation of
the plan, the following problems encountered during the field investiation and analysis
phases of the study resulted in further loss of anticipated data:

      1.   Fish studies of the nearshore are only partially completed.

      2.   Metal analysis  from both main lake and nearshore  studies suffered from
          problems in analysis, as did  analysis for toxic organics  in nearshore water,
          sediment and fish samples.
                                    -26-

-------
      3.   Water intake data are incomplete for toxic organic compounds.

      it.   Fewer zooplankton samples were collected and analyzed than planned.

      5.   Some phosphorus data for 1978 from the main lake stations demonstrated a
          low bias.

      6.   Detection limits insufficient to meet  I3C objectives for some  parameters
          resulted in excess violations to be reported.

      7.   In some cases, reports on individual studies (secondary components) were not
          prepared; however data are usually available.

      Data compatability. Analysis of study results from the participating laboratories
shows that the comparability  of data  is  not seriously affected by differences in
precision, except for dissolved and total  metals which  are present in the lake water at
very low concentrations.  However, differences  resulting from individual laboratory
biases are  significant for several parameters, particularly phosphorus, when compared
to the temporal  and  spatial variability  observed in  the lake.   Therefore,  it is not
possible (in all cases) to assume complete compatibility of data gathered by different
agencies,   or  by  the  same  agency in  different  years.    The  question  of  data
comparability is a relative one,  and judgments about the use of combined of data sets
must ultimately be made in the context of the specific  questions to which the data are
to be  applied. Certainly the data  gathered for  the  Intensive  Study can be used to
compare various portions of the  lake, to  define the lake's overall status and, for many
parameters, to specify violations of water quality objectives. However, the utility of
combined data sets to establish long-term trends is less certain.

      A test  of data compatibility  was performed in the western  basin by pooling
nearshore and offshore data gathered by CLEAR,  OME and  USEPA.  Using SYMAP
plots  of nine individual parameters,  contoured distribution maps were constructed for
seven  cruises  (see Figures 24 and  37 for examples of  SYMAP  plots).   These maps
showed expected nearshore/offshore gradients and northshore/southshore  differences
with the absence  of dicontinuities at agency interfaces.  Experiments such as this add
credibility  to the lake-wide assessment attempted by this study.
                                    -27-

-------
                                 CONCLUSIONS
      The major issues considered by the Intensive Study can be categorized into five
topics:  1) lake enrichment, 2) toxic substances, 3) public health, 4) land use activities
and 5) lake response to  remedial actions.   In order to place the  time  period of the
Intensive  Study (1978-1979) into perspective,  results are presented in reference to
previous investigations and to those conducted since the end of the Intensive Study.

Lake  Enrichment
      Prior  to  1970, water  quality investigations of Lake  Erie  were  conducted at
sporadic intervals with a wide  variety of field procedures and analytical  techniques.
For these reasons it  is difficult to document  long-term trends to any degree of
accuracy. Starting with Project Hypo (Burns and Ross 1972) in 1970 (a joint Canadian-
United  States  project to  investigate the  eutrophication of Lake Erie),  consistent
shipboard and laboratory procedures have been utilized by the several research groups
monitoring the status of the open waters of Lake Erie.  For the past decade, cruises
have  been undertaken annually in the  three  basins  of  the lake by  the following
organizations: 1) Canada Centre for  Inland Waters (NWRI),  2)  Center for Lake Erie
Area  Research (OSU), 3) Great Lakes Laboratory (SUNY) and 4) Great Lakes National
Program Office (USEPA).  The  following discussion characterizes the conditions of the
lake for several eutrophication-related parameters during the  period 1970 to 1982.

      Lake levels.  The mean Lake Erie water level for the  period 1860 to 1970 was
570.37 feet above International Great Lakes Datum,  1955.  For  the period  1960 to
1970,  the  average level was 570.24 feet, only slightly below  the mean.  However, for
the period 1970 to 1980, the average level rose to 571.74, a volumetric  increase of
approximately 3% between the two decades.  Of significance to  water quality, lake
levels during the  period 1970  to  1980 averaged about 0.5  m  above levels  for the
preceeding decade.  The lowest annual water level (569.01 feet for  1964) within the
earlier decade was about 1.1 m below the mean level for the highest  year  (572.72 for
1973)  of the latter decade.  This change  amounts to about a 7%  increase  in lake
volume.
                                   -28-

-------
      Higher lake levels have primarily resulted  from an  increased flow  of  higher
 quality water from the upper Great Lakes via the Detroit River.  This dilution effect,
 in combination with  more deeply submerged substrates in the nearshore regions and
 western basin shoals, may have had profound impacts on the lake biota.  With higher
 water,  greater attenuation of light reaching substrate suitable for the development of
 both  planktonic and attached forms of algae has occurred.  Lake level changes have
 likely contributed to  the absence, in the mid-1970s, of the basin-wide algal blooms and
 massive growths  of  the filamentous algae, Cladophora  glomerata,  which  were  so
 prevalent in the mid-1960s.

      Thermal  structure. The western  basin of Lake Erie is  essentially isothermal
 throughout the year.  This basin was determined to be unstratified during all 80 cruises
 undertaken during the period  1970-1982.  However, periods of temporary stratification
 in isolated areas of the western basin have been reported by Britt (1955), Carr et al.
 (1965) and Zapotosky and Herdendorf (1980). Such stratification is usually transitory
 in nature but can result in  severe oxygen  depletion conditions  due  to high oxygen
 demand of the sediments.

      The central basin of Lake Erie  typically  stratifies into three layers (referred to
 as limnions in this report) in  early June and turns over in early September. The mean
 thicknesses  of  the epilimnion, mesolimnion and hypolimnion during the  period 1970-
 1982 are presented in Table 5 and summarized below:

                              Central Lake Erie Thermal Strata
Limnion
Epilimnion
Mesolimnion
Hypolimnion
Thickness (m)
(± std error)
13.2 + 0.*
2.1 + 0.2
4.5 + 0.3
Cruises
(N)
42
42
47
The area of the central basin hypolimnion averages approximately 11,300 km  (Table
6) or about 70% of the surface area of the entire basin.  The mean thickness of the
                                    -29-

-------
                                                   TABLE 5
                                 LAKE ERIE CENTRAL BASIN THERMAL STRUCTURE
                                         (Thickness of Limnions in Meters)
i
CO
o
I
1970
MAY
Epi
Meso
Hypo 3.0
Total
JUNE
Epi
Meso
Hypo 3.9
Total
JULY
Epi
Meso
Hypo 3.1
Total
AUGUST
Epi
Meso
Hypo 2.7
Total
SEPTEMBER
Epi
Meso
Hypo 1.8
Total
LATE SEPT
Epi
Meso
Hypo
Total
1973
12.5
1.7
5.0
19.2
12.3
2.0
4.4
18.7
13.0
2.0
3.0
18.0
14.4
1.5
2.1
18.0
1974
11.2
1.6
6.2
19.0
13.8
1.1
4.6
19.5
12.6
1.4
4.3
18.3
12.6
1.8
4.6
19.0
1975
9.2
2.1
7.7
19.0
9.8
2.4
6.7
lO
10.5
1.6
6.8
18.9
1976
11.2
1.2
6.6
1970
14.0
2.0
3.0
1970
14.4
2.6
2.0
lO
1977
9.5
2.7
6.8
1970
12.4
2.0
4.6
19.0
15.0
1.0
3.0
19.0
15.7
1.2
2.1
1970
1978
5.7
6.5
8.6
20.8
10.9
4.5
4.7
207T
11.7
4.0
4.8
2075
13.5
2.6
4.1
20.2
16.3
1.8
3.4
2T75"
17.1
1.8
2.7
21.6
1979
11.8
2.9
5.6
20.3
15.5
1.9
3.3
2077
14.3
2.4
4.4
2T7T
13.4
2.2
4.4
2170
16.7
1.5
2.7
2071
1980
14.7
1.6
7.3
2376
12.7
1.7
6.2
20.6
13.3
2.1
5.8
2T72
13.5
1.6
5.2
2073
1981
10.8
1.8
7.4
20.0
12.7
2.4
5.2
20.3
14.9
1.7
4.3
20.9
17.5
1.3
3.0
21.8
1982
12.6
3.3
5.7
2O"
15.4
1.5
3.9
20.8
12.7
3.0
4.7
20.4
15.4
1.0
4.0
2074
17.2
1.9
2.6
2177
Std
Mean Error
(+)
10.0
4.2
5.7
19.9
12.0
2.1
5.8
1979
12.5
2.3
4.9
19.7
13.5
1.8
4.3
19.6
15.2
1.7
3.0
19.9
15.8
1.6
2.4
19.8
2.2
2.4
2.7
0.8
0.7
1.8
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.5
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.3
0.4
1.4
0.2
0.3

-------
                 TABLE 6



LAKE ERIE CENTRAL BASIN HYPOLIMNION AREA
Year
1970
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
Mean
Std
Error
May June
(km2) (km2)


14
13
12
13
14
13,976
11
15
11,439 10
12,708 13
1,272


,819
,678
,105
,245
,250

,330
,027
,974
,179
550
July Aug.
(km2) (km2)

12
11
13

12
14
11
13
13
13
12


,883
,860
,385

,876
,130
,320
,130
,750
,149
,943
292

12
11

11
11
12

12

11
12


,962
,698

,550
,775
,670

,570

,775
,143
215
Sept.
(km2)

11
10
9
3
1
12
8
12
11
5
8
1

,829
,556
,599
,380
,891
,000
,704
,520
,256
,538
,727
,206
Late
Sept. Mean
(km2) (km2)

3,660 10
12
12
9
9
13
11
12,890 12
5,867 11
10
7,472 11
2,786

,334
,233
,221
,012
,947
,263
,333
,488
,475
,575
,334

Std.
Error

2,239
909
1,315
2,824
2,703
553
1,524
309
2,027
1,308
505
                 -31-

-------
hypolimnion  shows considerable year-to-year variability (Figure 5).   No  trend  is
apparent, but  the 1975  hypolimnion,  with a  mean  thickness  of 7.1  meters,  was
significantly thicker than all other years.

     The year-to-year and seasonal characteristics of the central basin hypolimnion
are presented in Tables 7 and 8, respectively, and annual mean trends in hypolimnion
thickness, temperature and dissolved oxygen for  1970 to 1982 are given in Table  9.
The mean hypolimnion temperature has been relatively consistent over this period,
with the exception of 1975 which was significantly colder than other years (Figure 6).
The mean dissolved oxygen content (Figure 7) of the hypolimnion does not show a
statistically significant trend from  1970 to 1982, but the  poorest year, 1973, had a
significantly lower content, than the oxygen concentrations measured during the  past
five years (1978-1982).

     In general, the central basin  hypolimnion decreases in thickness and area (Figure
8) and in dissolved oxygen (Figure 9) throughout the stratified period,  but increases in
temperature (Figure 9). The  mean monthly trends in these characteristics for 1970 to
1982 are summarized below:

                         Central Basin Hypolimnion Characteristics
Period
(Month)

May
June
July
August
September
Thickness

(m)
5.7
6.2
5.2
4.4
3.3
Area

(km2)
12,708
13,179
12,943
12,143
8,727
Temperature

<°C)
7.7
8.6
11.1
12.2
13.1
Dissolved
Oxygen
(mg/1)
11.2
9.2
6.2
2.6
1.7
Statistical variability and sample sizes for these means are given in Tables 6 and 9.
                                    -32-

-------
I
u>
LO
      CO

      LJ
      I-
      UJ
CO
CO
Lul

^
CJ
            10.0

             9.0

             8.0
             4.0


             3.0


             2.0


             1.0


             0.0
                    MAXIMUM

                    + STANDARD ERROR
                    MEAN

                    NUMBER OF SAMPLES
                    - STANDARD ERROR


                    MINIMUM
                    1970  1971  1972  1973  1974  1975  1976  1977 1978  1979  1980  1981  1982

                                                      YEAR
                 FIGURE 5.   LAKE ERIE HYPOLIMNION  THICKNESS  - CENTRAL BASIN

-------
                                     TABLE 7



LAKE ERIE CENTRAL BASIN HYPOLIMNION THICKNESS, TEMPERATURE AND DISSOLVED OXYGEN
Thickness


Year
• 1970
LO
f 1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982

Min
(m)
1.8

3.0
4.3
6.7
3.0
2.1
4.3
2.7
5.2
3.0
2.6

Max
(m)
3.9

5.0
6.2
7.7
6.6
6.8
8.6
5.6
7.3
7.4
5.7

Mean
(m)
3.0

4.1
5.0
7.1
4.8
4.1
5.6
4.2
6.1
5.2
4.2
Std
Error
(1)
0.4

0.6
0.5
0.3
1.8
1.1
0.6
0.9
0.4
0.9
0.5

Min
t°0
7.5

10.3
8.8
6.5
9.4
10.4
7.0
9.8
6.7
9.1
6.4
Temperature

Max
<°0
12.7

13.8
13.8
10.2
13.7
11.9
13.1
14.0
13.1
14.0
14.0

Mean
(°C)
10.2

12.0
11.5
8.1
11.6
11.1
11.6
11.9
11.3
11.5
10.2
Std
Error
(*)
0.9

1.0
1.3
1.1
2.1
0.3
0.9
2.1
1.5
1.2
1.3
Dissolved

Min
(mg/1)
0.0

1.1
0.7
3.3
0.7
0.5
3.0
—
3.0
2.2
2.2

Max
(mg/1)
9.6

4.9
9.9
10.0
9.6
8.3
12.2
—
9.7
9.4
11.0
Oxygen

Mean
(mg/1)
4.3

2.5
4.5
7.0
5.2
4.4
7.8
—
6.3
5.5
5.9

Std
Error
(*)
1.9

1.2
2.0
2.0
3.7
2.8
1.7
--
1.5
1.8
1.7


Cruises
(N)
5

3
4
3
2
4
4
2
4
4
5

-------
                       TABLE 8



LAKE ERIE CENTRAL BASIN HYPOLIMNION CHARACTERISTICS

MAY
Thick (m)
DO (mg/1)
Temp (°C)
!> JUNE
« Thick
DO
Temp
JULY
Thick
DO
Temp
AUGUST
Thick
DO
Temp
1970
3.0
9.6
7.5

3.9
6.5
8.8

3.1
4.0
10.4

2.7
1.2
11.6
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978 1979
1980
1981
8.6 5.6
12.2 12.0
7.0 9.8





5.0
4.9
10.3

4.4
1.6
11.9

6.2
9.9
8.8

4.6
5.2
11.8

4.3
2.1
13.5

7.7
10.0
6.5

6.7
7.8
7.7

6.8
3.3
10.2

6.6
9.6
9.4





3.0
0.7
13.7

6.8
8.3
10.4

4.6
5.1
11.0

3.0
2.1
11.9

5
11
9

7
7
12

5
5
11

.6
.0
.3

.1 4.4
.5 7.2
.5 14.0

.5
.4
.5

7.3
9.7
6.7

6.2
7.8
12.7

5.8
4.5
13.1

7.4
9.4
9.1

5.2
7.7
9.9

4.3
2.2
12.8
1982
5.7
11.0
6.4

3.9
8.3
8.2

4.7
5.2
10.8

4.0
2.7
11.4

-------
                                            TABLE 8 (CONTINUED)
                      1970   1973   1974   1975   1976   1977   1978   1979   1980   1981   1982
SEPTEMBER
     Thick
     DO
     Temp
 1.8    3.0    4.6
 0.0    1.1    0.7
12.7   13.8   13.8
 2.1    4.3    2.7    5.2    3.0    2.6
 0.5    3.0           3.0    2.7    2.2
11.2   13.1          12.5   14.0   14.0
NET OXYGEN DEMAND

     Volume rate:      0.11   0.12   0.13   0.10   0.13   0.13   0.09   0.09   0.11   0.09   0.11
     (mg/1)
     Area rate:
     (g/m2)
 0.38   0.53   0.60   0.67    0.75    0.58    0.51    0.41    0.63    0.47    0.47

-------
                                        TABLE 9



ANNUAL MEAN TRENDS IN LAKE ERIE CENTRAL BASIN HYPOLIMNION CHARACTERISTICS (1970-1982)
Month



MAY
JUNE
JULY
AUGUST
SEPTEMBER
Thickness

Min
(m)
3.0
3.9
3.1
3.0
1.8

Max
(m)
8.6
7.7
7.1
5.8
5.2

Mean
(m)
5.7
6.2
5.2
4.4
3.3
Std
Error
(*>
1.1
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.4
Temperature

Min
(°0
6.4
6.5
7.7
10.2
11.2

Max
(°C)
9.8
10.4
14.0
13.7
14.0

Mean
<°C)
7.7
8.6
11.1
12.2
13.1
Std
Error
(*)
0.7
0.4
0.6
0.3
0.3
Dissolved Oxygen

Min
(mg/1)
9.6
6.5
4.0
0.7
0.0

Max
(mg/1)
12.2
11.0
7.8
5.4
3.0

Mean
(mg/1)
11.2
9.2
6.2
2.6
1.7
Std
Error
(±)
0.6
0.4
0.5
0.5
0.4

Cruises
(N)
4
9
10
10
9

-------
I
u>
00
15.0
14.0
13.0
Q 12.0
LJ
£ 11.0
CD
Ul
S 10.0
LU
§ 9.0
h-
8] 8.0
0.
1 7.0
6.0
q a
••
•M»

•»
•
•
;
-
-
>
-
*
-
.
-
-
-







i
_







f*

_











/-"^
^^
*r

5



t


i i



^





k











I




3







1










\
X .


,

















\






/








/J


^


/





X




t
^


A





3

1



IBI


































4















«<











^










1



-*--
^~^






^



.


s



.
•
«

^


2
•«

S











»•





^— —


4





•••

i












's










I

~H


\
A
4





S















J5





i
                                               YEAR
             FIGURE  6.   LAKE  ERIE HYPOLIMNION  TEMPERATURE -  CENTRAL BASIN

-------
                                 -ee-
                    DISSOLVED OXYGEN CMG/L)
CT



m

vj
p\
m

m
73
i—i
m

x
o
2
m
o

o
X
-c
Q
m
 i

o
m
2
CD
     -c
     m
ca

o
                              en
               en
         (O
CO
to

UJ


i-j»
CO
CO

en


i—*
CO

en


i—»
CO
CO
-*J
CO
CO
         CO
         CO
CO
CD
         CO
         CO
           ca
              en
en
CO


CSJ
p
en
ro

ta
to

en
en

CS3





-  !£=£=!    '

-------
cc
UJ

tn
W
w
Ul
o
l-«

X
8
en
UJ
o:
     10.0



      a0
  7.0




  6.0




  5.0




  4.0




  3.0




  2.0




  1.0




  0.0







20000



18000




1K00




14000



12020




10000



 6000



 6820



 4000




 2000




   0
                  MAY
JUN
 JUL



MONTH
AUG
SEP
                  MAY
                          JIM
           JUL


          MONTH
            AUG
           SEP
          FIGURE 8.   LAKE  ERIE HYPOLIMNION -  MEAN ANNUAL

                      TRENDS IN THICKNESS AND  AREA FOR

                      CENTRAL BASIN  (1970 - 1982)
                                    -AO-

-------
                          DISSOLVED OXYGEN  CMG/L)
                  DEGREES  (CELSIUS)
      CO
   ac
en m nr

^"3
   >- C3
x^ Z f—
*— * CD •— '

§ o z
csa •— « >— <

 .  <^§
   C3
•-» r~  I

§1=^3=
r\j a [n

   o z
   X
   -<: >-
   cr> z
   m z


   *P
   CD

   =°^

      2
      o
o
                                                                           09   *•*!    CD   |O   CO   *-*   fO   tO  J»*

                                                                           eaoacaoacQeacacaco
                                                                                                          r | . • > w f -i

-------
     The seasonal pattern for the thermal structure of central Lake Erie is shown in
Figure 10.   Once the thermocline is  well  established, generally in  late June, the
mesolimnion remains relatively uniform in thickness as the epilimnion thickens at the
expense of  the hypolimnion.  Eventually, the cooling of the surface water forces the
epilimnion  to  the bottom of the lake, eliminating the other  limnions at "turnover."
This thinning of the hypolimnion increases the bottom surface area to water  volume
ratio in  the  hypolimnion, which tends to  increase the effect of sediment  oxygen
demand (SOD) on the remaining hypolimnetic water.

     The eastern basin of Lake Erie is normally stratified from June through October
or early November.   The  mean  thicknesses  of  the  epilimnion,  mesolimnion  and
hypolimnion during 1978 are  presented below:

                             Eastern Lake Erie Thermal Strata
Limnion
Epilimnion
Mesolimnion
Hypolimnion
Thickness (m)
(+ std error)
13.1 +2.7
8.5+ 1.8
12.5 + 0.5
Cruises
(N)
5
5
5
Generally the hypolimnion in the eastern basin is of sufficient thickness that severe
oxygen depletion problems do not develop.

     The thermal structure of Lake Erie is  highly dependent on wind and other
meteorological conditions.  Calm weather in the western basin  can be effective  in
forming  transitory stratification during  the summer months.   In the central  and
eastern basins, calm weather during the late spring can result in a shallow thermocline
and  a  correspondingly  thick hypolimnion.   This  situation  occurred in  1975 with a
dramatic impact on dissolved oxygen concentrations in the central basin hypolimnion.
Herdendorf  (1980) documented  that  in  1975 the thickness of  the hypolimnion  was
considerably thicker than earlier years of the decade and that  the oxygen depletion
rate was lower and the  areal extent of anoxia was greatly reduced (see Figures 12 and
 15 for comparison with other years).
                                    -42-

-------
                                                  MONTH
Lo
I
O)

UJ

UJ

w

X
h-
Q_
UJ
a
 0.0


 2.0


 4.0


 6.0


 8.0


10.0


12.0


14.0


16.0


18.0


20.0
                           MAY
JUN
—r~
                                         JUL
                                                           AUG
SEP
  EPILIMNION
                                         HYPQLIMNION
                                                               THERMOCLINE

                                                                A UPPER KNEE

                                                                0 LOVER KNEE
                FIGURE  10.   LAKE ERIE THERMAL STRUCTURE  - MEAN ANNUAL  TREND IN

                             LIMNION THICKNESSES FOR CENTRAL BASIN  C1970  - 1982)

-------
     Dissolved oxygen. Low concentrations of dissolved oxygen, particularly in the
central  basin  hypolimnion,  is one  of the  most important  environmental  problems
plaguing Lake Erie.  Small areas of  anoxic water in the central basin were observed as
early as 1930 (Fish  1960).   The size  of the late summer anoxic portion of the lake
continued to grow for the next several decades until 1973, when approximately 94% of
the hypolimnion had oxygen concentrations  below  0.5  mg/1 (Herdendorf 1980).  More
recent surveys have shown wide fluctuations  in the size  of the anoxic area in the
central  basin, primarily due to the  meteorological conditions discussed  earlier for
1975; however, the  area and the percentage of the hypolimnion experiencing anoxia
have declined markedly in the period 1977 to 1982, as seen below:

                           Central Lake Erie Anoxic Area Trends


Period
1970-1976*
1977-1982
Anoxic
Area (km )
(+ std error)
8,678 ± 890
4,294 ± 434

Percent
Hypolimnion
75.2 ± 6.0
35.2 ± J.6
Percent
Total
Basin
55.2 ± 5.2
27.0 ± 2.2

Years
(N)
5
5
        * 1975 excluded
      Typically, the central basin hypolimnion contains about  8 mg/1  of  dissolved
oxygen in late June, but by early September this has been reduced to less than 1 mg/1
over much of the basin. Figure  11 depicts the distribution of hypolimnetic oxygen in
1981  and illustrates the loss of oxygen during the stratified period.  This pattern is
typical of the depletion process which has occurred during the past five years.
                                     -44-

-------
                                               Hypolimnion Oxygen (mg/1)
                                               June 24-July 3,  1981
                                               Hypolimnion Oxygen (mg/1)
                                               September  1-11, 1981
FIGURE 11.  DISTRIBUTION  OF DISSOLVED OXYGEN  IN  LAKE ERIE CENTRAL
            BASIN HYPOLIMNION (1981)

-------
     One method  of determining trends in oxygen concentrations involves measuring
the rate of loss in oxygen in the interval between two cruises. Table 10 provides a list
of the  calculated central basin oxygen demand for the period 1970 to 1982, expressed
as both oxygen loss per unit volume of water (mg/1) and loss per unit  area (g/m ) per
day between two cruises.  Table 11 shows estimates of oxygen demand for both the
central and eastern basin by various investigators for  the period 1930 to  1982.  The
general inference  that  can be drawn from  the  rate  measurement  data is that the
hypolimnetic oxygen demand in the central basin increased  during the period  1930 to
1970, remained relatively  stable during the mid-1970s (with the exception of 1975
which  has  been discussed earlier), and  declined slightly during the last five  years
(Figure 12).   The  daily  losses per unit volume  and unit area (with standard  error
estimate) for these three blocks of years are summarized below:
                   Central Basin Hypolimnetic Oxygen Demand
        Period                Volumetric Loss Rate       Areal Loss Rate
                             (mg/l/day)                 (g/m2/day)
        1930-1970            0.079 ±0.010               0.25 + 0.06
        1970-1976*           0.123 + 0.010               0.57 + 0.08
        1977-1982            0.107 + 0.006               0.52 + 0.03
* 197 5 excluded

From  these data the significant increase in the rate of oxygen loss from 1930 to 1970
is obvious, but the recent decline may not be  significant but merely a slight downward
trend  in the relative stable  period that has persisted since  1970.   This  stability in
central  basin hypolimnetic oxygen demand from 1970 to  1982, particularly during the
                                    -46-

-------
                     TABLE 10



LAKE ERIE CENTRAL BASIN HYPOLIMNETIC OXYGEN DEMAND
Year
Volumetric
Loss Rate
Min Max Mean
(mg/l/day) (mg/l/day) (mg/l/day)
1970
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1980
1981
1982
0.110
0.100
0.100
0.070
0.130
0.086
0.073
0.101
0.073
0.102
0.120
0.130
0.190
0.120
0.130
0.149
0.149
0.116
0.097
0.121
0.113
0.120
0.130
0.100
0.130
0.120
0.111
0.109
0.085
0.111
Area Loss Rate
Std Error
0.003
0.014
0.025
0.028
0.000
0.011
0.015
0.008
0.014
0.009
Min
(g/m /day)
0.36
0.46
0.42
0.53
0.75
0.35
0.34
0.61
0.46
0.44
Max
(g/m2/day)
0.39
0.60
0.85
0.80
0.75
0.63
0.93
0.64
0.47
0.51
Mean
(g/m2/day)
0.38
0.53
0.60
0.67
0.75
0.48
0.54
0.63
0.47
0.47
Std Error
0.01
0.07
0.10
0.13
0.00
0.05
0.11
0.01
0.00
0.02
Cruise
Intervals
(N)
3
2
4
2
1
5
5
2
2
4

-------
                               TABLE 11

         TRENDS IN NET OXYGEN DEMAND OF THE CENTRAL AND
        EASTERN BASINS HYPOLIMNIONS OF LAKE ERIE (1930-1982)
 DATA

SOURCE    YEAR                 NET  OXYGEN DEMAND PER DAY

                      Rate Per Unit Area        Rate Per  Unit Volume

1
1
1
1
2
3,4
3,4
3,4
3,4
3
2
5
2
5
3
3
3

1930
1940
1950
1960
1970
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1977
1978
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
Central
Basin
0.08
0.15
0.25
0.37
0.38
0.53
0.60
0.67
0.75
0.58
0.48
0.51
0.54
0.41
0.63
0.47
0.47
Eastern
Basin

—
—
—
0.70
0.23
0.57
0.76
—
0.68
0.51
0.58
0.61
0.58
--
—
--
Central
Basin
0.054
0.067
0.070
0.093
0.110
0.120
0.130
0.100
0.130
0.130
0.120
0.092
0.111
0.090
0.109
0.085
0.111
Eastern
Basin
0.023
0.027
0.032
0.036
0.055
0.016
0.026
0.040
0.032
0.060
0.065
0.048
0.047
0.049
—
—
—
Data sources:  (1) Dobson and Gilbertson (1971);  (2)  CCIW--
Noel Burns, personal communication; (3) OSU/CLEAR—Central
Basin,  1973-1977, 1980-1982; Eastern Basin, 1977;  (4)  SUNY/GLL--
Eastern Basin, 1973-1976; (5)  USEPA/6LNPO—rate  calculation,
OSU/CLEAR.
                                 -48-

-------



Q
_J
LD
"£•
^.
vy
L in
x> CO
• o
"Z.
UJ
LD
X
O


0.15
0.14
0.13
0.12
0.11
0.10
0.09
0.08
0.07
0.06
0.05
   1930 1940  1950  1960  1970  1973  1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1980 1981  1982
                                  YEAR
FIGURE 12.  LAKE  ERIE HYPOLIMNION OXYGEN DEMAND - CENTRAL BASIN

-------
month of August, is illustrated in Figure 13. This tight cluster of data points suggest
that August is the more opportune month to obtain oxygen depletion measurements for
rate comparisons.

      Early  oxygen  depletion data  is not available for  the eastern basin.  A slight
increase may be indicated from the first half to the second half of the  past  decade;
however, the data in Table  11 shows an erratic pattern in the early 1970s, which may
be the result of diverse analytical techniques.

      Another method of assessing the oxygen status of the central basin hypolimnion
is comparing the relative sizes of anoxic areas from  year to year.   Anoxia is  here
defined as dissolved oxygen concentrations of  less than  0.5 mg/l  as measured 1.0
meters above the sediment-water interface.  Figure 14 is a mosaic of Lake Erie maps
from 1930 to 1982  showing the 15 years where reasonably good data exists for the
areal extent of anoxia. The estimated areas of the anoxic hypolimnion are presented
in Table !2 and shown graphically in Figure 15. The obvious conclusion  is  that the area
of the central  basin experiencing anoxia increased dramatically from 1930 to the mid-
1970s and since that time has declined to approximately half of the maximum area.

      Clarity.  Water  clarity is an  indicator  of  both  phytoplankton  biomass and
inorganic particulate matter suspended in the water column. Turbidity  patterns mirror
those that will be presented for total phosphorus.  Central  and eastern basin turbidity
is primarily the result of the organic component, whereas  in the western basin spring
meltwaters carry a  large component of inorganic solids  to the lake.

      An analysis of Lake Erie transparency was performed for the period 1973-1982
by area-weighting secchi disk results from 33 cruises in  the western basin, 37 in the
central basin  and  10  in  the eastern basin  (Table  13).  No  significant trends or
improvements are demonstrated by the data.  The mean  summer values for 4-year
periods are summarized below:
                                    »50-

-------
Ui
                     -  0.30
                      RJ
                     T3
                      O)
                      E
                     v>^

                     111
                     I-
Z
O
                     UJ

                     0.
                     UJ
                     O

                     Z
                     UJ
                     O
                     >•
                     X
                     O
                         0.20
    0.10
                           0
                                     Cruise Interval Technique
                                                        1974,
                                                 1977«
        -19771
         1978*
                    • 1974

                    • 1970
               1982
1979 A 1973
   1970«
                     1977
                                      1981
  1982

1978
      1980*
       1978
                                                     CLEAR  (1973-1977, 1980-1982)

                                                     CCIW (1970, 1977, 1978)

                                                     USEPA  (1978, 1979)
                                                                                1978
                                     11978
  1977 1975
     A A A
19771

 1978
                                                1981
     ^1980

TgluTl970"1977
 •   *  .1973
1 974 1 978
                                       1982
                                                                • 1 974
                            ,1977

                             •1970
                                     June
                                   July
                       August
                                          September
                            FIGURE 13.  LAKE ERIE HYPOLIMNION OXYGEN DEMAND-SEASONAL  DEPLETION
                                         RATES FOR CENTRAL BASIN (1970-1982)

-------
FIGURE  14.  DISTRIBUTION OF ANOXIA IN LAKE ERIE (1930 - 1982).
                          -52-

-------
                              TABLE  12

            ESTIMATED AREA OF THE ANOXIC HYPOLIMNION
           OF THE CENTRAL BASIN OF LAKE ERIE  (1930-1982)
Year
1930
1959
1960
1961
1964
1970
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1980
1981
1982
Anoxic Area
(km2)
300
3,600
1,660
3,640
5,870
6,600
7,970
11,270
10,250
400
7,300
2,870
3,980
4,330
4,820
5,470
Percent of
Hypo limn ion
(*)
3.0
33.0
15.0
33.0
53.0
60.0
72.5
93.7
87.0
4.1
63.0
24.8
31.4
35.9
37.4
46.5
Central Basin
Total Basin
(«)
1.9
22.3
10.3
22.5
36.3
40.4
49.3
69.8
63.4
2.5
53.0
20.8
24.6
26.8
29.0
33.9
Data Sources:
     1930—Fish (1960)
     1959-1961-Thomas  (1963)
     1964—FWPCA (1968a)
     1970—CCIW (Burns  and Ross 1972)
     1972-1977, 1980-1982—OSU/CLEAR
     1978—ANL (Zapotosky and White 1980)
                                -53-

-------
a
CO
Ul
CJ
t—I
X
o
12000
11000
10000
 9000
 8000
 7000
 6000
 5000
 4000
 3000
 2000
 1000
    0
             1930 1959 1960 1961  1964 1970 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977  1978 1980 1981  1982
                                             YEAR
          FIGURE 15.   LAKE ERIE HYPOLIMNION - AREA OF ANOXIA FOR
                       CENTRAL BASIN

-------
                TABLE 13



LAKE ERIE SUMMER SECCHI DISK TRANSPARENCY
Year
1973
, 1974
$ 1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
Western
Min Max
(m) (m)
1.78
1.25
0.79
0.85
1.09
1.94
1.44
1.50
0.59
0.95
2.12
2.35
1.56
2.78
1.09
2.68
3.03
1.73
1.19
2.24
Basin
Mean
1.94
1.72
1.21
1.82
1.09
2.14
2.19
1.58
0.87
1.62
Std
Error
0.10
0.22
0.23
0.96
0.00
0.13
0.34
0.08
0.17
0.27
Central Basin
Min Max Mean
(m) (m) (m)
4.31
4.38
3.63
4.39
4.69
4.22
3.49
4.66
2.77
3.21
6.72
6.36
7.99
4.42
6.55
6.93
5.80
7.02
6.08
6.66
5.45
5.69
5.51
4.41
5.55
5.52
5.02
5.88
4.02
4.93
Std
Error
0.45
0.36
1.29
0.01
0.54
0.65
0.77
0.68
1.04
0.73
Min
(m)
—
—
3.69
4.22
3.07
—
—
—
Eastern Basin
Max Mean
(m) (m)
—
—
7.21
7.03
6.91
—
—
__
—
--
5.60
5.74
4.99
--
—
—
Std
Error
—
—
1.03
0.57
1.40
--
--
--
Cruises
(N)
W C E
3
5
3
2
1
5
4
3
3
5
5
5
3
2
3
5
3
3
3
5
—
—
3
5
2
--
—
—

-------
                      Secchi Disk Transparency for Lake Erie
Period       Western Basin
             (m ± std error)
Central Basin
(m ± std error)
Eastern Basin
(m ± std error)
1973-1976    1.67 ± 0.16
1976-1979    1.81 ± 0.25
1979-1982    1.57 ± 0.27
5.27 ± 0.29
5.13 ± 0.27
4.96 + 0.38
5.54 + 0.17
     The year with the poorest water clarity for the western basin (Figure 16) and the
central  basin (Figure  17) was recorded in 1981  which coincides with  a year that
experienced  severe  late  spring  storms  and  associated  resuspension  of bottom
sediments.   Even with these  low values, the transparency  in the western and central
basins was  relatively  constant throughout the 10-year period.  From the limited data
for the  eastern basin,  it appears that mean transparencies in the eastern and central
basins are very similar.  In general, the central basin transparency exceeds that of the
western basin by a factor of three.

     Dissolved Substances.  Trends in dissolved  substances in Lake Erie water can be
inferred from  long-term  records of  Lake  Erie  conductivity  measurements  and
determination of major conservative  ions,  such as sulfate and chloride.  Central basin
cruise data for  1970  to 1982 (Figure 18)  indicates a significant decline in specific
conductance.   The typical distributions of  the major  dissolved ions  in  Lake Erie
(alkalinity,  conductivity,  calcium,  sulfate,  chloride,   sodium,  magnesium,  and
potassium)  are illustrated in Figure  19.   The tendency  is for  most substances to
increase from west to east as water flows through the basins.  USEPA/GLNPO, using
STORET data  files for the  period  1966  to 1980, performed a trend analysis for
conductivity, chloride and sulfate based on  central basin cruise data supplied by CCIW,
OME, GLNPO and CLEAR.  OME data  was  obtained  from stations  1-7  km offshore,
                                    -56-

-------
a:
LU

UJ
UJ
Q.
0)
10.0P



 9.0



 8.0



 7.0



 6.0



 5.0



 4.0



 3.0



 2.0



 1.0



 0.0
             1970 1971  1972  1973 1974  1975  1976 1977  1978  1979 1980  1981  1982


                                            YEAR
          FIGURE 16.  LAKE  ERIE SUMMER SECCHI DISK TRANSPARENCY -

                      WESTERN BASIN

-------
Ln
00
10.0
9.0
8.0
en 7.0
a:
LJ
' — oo
LJ 0.0
>- 5.0
u
z
LJ t _
a: 4.0
Q.
CO
§ 3.0
2.0
1.0
ft PI





•
„
—
-
-

-
-
-
i i i







i
















r















^- — '
5













-4












































lx

3












/i



k














^V
\
\















N







./















^


3 '










;







5






                  1970 1971  1972  1973 1974  1975  1976  1977 1978  1979  1980 1981  1982

                                                 YEAR
               FIGURE 17.  LAKE  ERIE SUMMER SECCHI DISK  TRANSPARENCY -

                           CENTRAL  BASIN

-------
                      CONDUCTIVITY  CUMHOS/CM)
o
73
m
GO
r
•>
m
m

m
to
m
o
i—i
TI
>—i
o
o
o
a
o
o
m
 i
o
m
GO
CO
r
c
>— »
CO

ororororococouJCjococo
Jic7j^4cococa»-»rou)-t».c-n
a r^ ^r> pa pa pa ^a PQ^ pa pa PO
i m i
1 IZJ 1
     m
         CO
         CO
         ro
         »—*
         CD
         CO

         i—»
         CO
CO
en

»—»
CO
OJ

•—»
CO
         CO
         CO

         I—»
         CO
         CO
         CO
         CO
         CO
         00
         CO
         oo
         ro
•
1
a>
\ I
1 1
f
I 1

i 1 \
1 1 I

-------
               1978 MEAN  CONCENTRATIONS
 i
o\
o
                                                             Alkalinity  ( mg/l )
                                                             as CaC03
                                                             Epilimnion
                                                             Conductivity ( umhos/cm )
                                                             Epilimnion
                                                             Calcium ( mg/l )
                                                             Epilimnion
                                                            Sulfate ( mg/l )
                                                            Epilimnion
 Chloride  ( mg/l )
 Epilimnion
Magnesium  ( mg/l )
Epilimnion
Potassium ( mg/l )
Epilimnion
                                 FIGURE  19.  DISTRIBUTION  OF MAJOR  DISSOLVED SOLIDS  IN LAKE  ERIE

-------
while data from the other three groups were from open lake stations, generally 5 km
or more offshore.  Annual mean values for 5-year periods are summarized below:

                       Dissolved Solids in Central Lake Erie
Period            Specific Conductance       Chloride              Sulfate
                 (umhos/cm + std error)   (mg/I + std error)      (mg/l + std error)
1966-1970
1971-1975
1976-1980
313
298
284
+
+
+
1.8
7.0
2.8
24.0
21.6
19.4
+ 0.5
+ 0.8
+ 0.3
24.3
22.7
22.5
+
+
+
0.8
0.4
0.4
Specific conductance data points on Figure 20 represent cruise mean values for periods
of isothermal lake conditions (March-May and October-December).  Conductivity thus
indicates a rather slow decline for mean levels for the period of record. The mean
value for 1976-1980 (284 umhos/cm) is  approximately nine percent lower than  the
mean 1966-1970 value (313 umhos/cm).  Trends in central  basin chloride (Figure 20)
shows a more noticeable decline from a mean concentration of  24.0 mg/l for  1966-
1970 to 19.4 mg/l for 1976-1980. Sulfate concentrations showed no discernable trend.

     Nutrients. Phosphorus  has  been  identified  as  a limiting  nutrient for  algal
productivity in Lake Erie (Hartley and Potos 1971), whereas nitrogen is in sufficiently
large supplies in the waters of the lake that it is  not  considered a limiting nutrient.
The status of both of these  elements will be discussed in this section.

     Annual mean concentrations  for the western, central and eastern basins for  the
period  1970 to 1982 (Table  14) are presented in Figures  21, 22 and 23, respectively, and
are summarized in 5-year periods below:
                                     -61-

-------
          Lake Erie Central Basin Conductivity umhos/cm at 25°C
          Storet Monthly Mean Values Plotted
       380
       360
     y
     m 340
g 32°
j>

| 300



f 280

u

1 260
o
U

  240


  220


  200
            • *  si.-*•  '•:
                           ^     ~
                                            •*•
                                                                • CCIW
                                                                • MOE
                                                                • GLNPO
                                                                •*. CLEAR
                                                                 'CCIW&
                                                                 'MOE
          1966 1967 1968 1969 197O 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975- 1976 1977 1978 1979 198O
          Lake Erie Central Basin Chloride (mg/l)
          Storet Monthly Mean Values Plotted
        28)-


        27



        26


        25


        24


        23
      s

      I 22
      o

      " 21


        20
        18
        16
           I    l	I	i
                             l
                                                        • CCIW
                                                        • MOE
                                                        • GLNPO
                                                        x i CCIW &
                                                          'MOE
                                                      I	I    I
          1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977  1978 1979 1980
FIGURE 20.  TRENDS IN LAKE ERIE SPECIFIC  CONDUCTANCE AND
               CHLORIDE CONCENTRATION-CENTRAL BASIN
                                    -62-

-------
                                                  TABLE 14


                                LAKE ERIE TOTAL PHOSPHORUS CONCENTRATIONS
u>
I
Year
1970
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
Western
Min Max
(ug/1) (ug/1)
33.4
21.7
22.9
32.4
29.5
33.9
__
19.1
17.7
24.1
23.2
60.0
48.4
45.9
56.6
67.0
53.3
--
98.0
37.7
55.3
139.7
Basin
Mean
(ug/1)
44.6
34.7
35.1
42.3
44.9
40.7
--
33.9
28.8
36.7
46.9
Std
Error
3.0
6.9
3.6
3.5
6.7
6.3
--
8.2
2.2
3.1
15.7
Central Basin
Min Max Mean
(ug/1) (ug/1) (ug/1)
11.6
14.3
13.6
14.6
16.5
12.2
12.0
10.0
4.0
13.4
10.4
36.0
25.6
20.1
31.7
28.8
33.1
15.7
18.4
23.2
26.0
34.8
20.5
18.5
16.8
20.3
22.5
24.1
14.2
13.4
13.9
19.0
16.3
Std
Error
2.5
3.6
1.1
2.8
2.3
3.1
0.5
0.9
2.4
1.4
1.6
Min
(ug/1)
8.8
11.8
7.9
14.1
—
13.0
9.9
5.2
9.3
--
—
Eastern Basin
Max Mean
(ug/1) (ug/1)
30.9
68.8
66,8
42.9
—
22.9
16.5
18.6
23.7
--
—
17.5
31.1
20.8
27.6
—
18.3
13.0
10.8
13.8
--
--
Std
Error
2.2
11.3
2.8
4.1
--
2.1
1.0
2.4
2.6
--
--
Cruises
(N)
W C E
10
3
6
6
5
3
—
9
9
9
6
10
3
6
6
5
7
6
8
9
9
7
10
4
6
5
—
4
6
5
5
—
--

-------
CD
Z)
v^

CO
Z)
cc
a
X
CL
CO
a
IE
CL
90.0
80.0
70.0
60.0
50.0
40.0

30.0

20.0
10.0
fl ra



-
-
.
^

-
-
•




i


k

















i i














i






3





















s










X
6










/>




r






1




-^
6










j


V

•J«H



|




5










-i










s,










x
>v
X,



1




**n


i










r









	 	
R









j










<









/
9








;




s,
^^^^
LJ8



, ,
              1970  1971  1972  1973  1974  1975  1976 1977  1978  1979 1980  1981  1982
                                             YEAR
          FIGURE 21.   LAKE ERIE  TOTAL PHOSPHORUS  CONCENTRATION -  WESTERN BASIN

-------
I
cr>
Ui
50.0
45.0
40.0
35.0











r*










^^*
"^










j











r*










^^ —











j











k
\

















T
p











— c
H











Mrt










,











^



















x'











k






|




a.
^\

























7



i
                    1970  1971  1972 1973  1974  1975 1976  1977  1978  1979  1980  1981  1982


                                                   YEAR
                FIGURE  22.   LAKE ERIE TOTAL PHOSPHORUS CONCENTRATION

                             CENTRAL BASIN

-------
Ov
70.0
65.0
60.0
55.0
50.0
Q 45.0
g 40.0
co 35.0
o 30.0
I
8) 25.0
o
a! 20.0
15.0
10.0
5.0
PI 01
r-
j
^
|-
-
—
-






IMH
1

f
, . .-





10
1 1


y"







^


\
4







s












/






>
J6

k
t^kj T rn
"ir5 IE.
II i ii
                   1970  1971  1972 1973  1974  1975  1976 1977  1978  1979  1980 1981  1982
                                                  YEAR
               FIGURE  23.   LAKE ERIE TOTAL PHOSPHORUS CONCENTRATION - EASTERN BASIN

-------
                   Total Phosphorus Concentrations in Lake Erie
Period
 Western Basin
(ug/1 + std error)
 Central Basin
(ug/1 ± std error)
 Eastern Basin
(ug/1 ± std error)
1970-1974
1975-1979
1980-1982
38.1 ± 3.2
40.5 ± 2.3
37.5 ± 5.2
18.6 + 1.1
18.9 ± 2.2
16.4 t 1.5
23.1 ±4.1
17.4 ± 4.3
13.8 ± 2.6
The western basin has a significantly higher concentration than the other two basins by
a  factor  of over  two,  but no  statistically significant  changes  in  concentrations
occurred since 1970. However, a slight decline is suspected for the latter half of the
1970s when spring storm values are excluded from the annual means, as has been done
in Figure 21 for the shallow western basin.

     The distribution of most nutrients throughout  the lake shows similar patterns.
Total phosphorus, for example is characterized by high concentrations near the mouth
of the Maumee River in the western basin  (Figure 24) and the Cuyahoga River in the
central basin (Figure 25).  The impact of hypolimnetic regeneration of phosphorus in
both central and eastern basins  is also illustrated in Figure 25. There is a  general
west-to-east decrease with highest values located  along the United States shore,
particularly at the  mouths of major tributaries.  The Detroit River is an exception in
that a large volume of  upper  Great Lakes water tends to dilute  the nutrient load
contributed by the urban and industrial complex adjacent to the river.  Although low in
concentration  when  compared to the  Maumee River, the Detroit  River  in 1980
contributed approximately 37% of the total  load of phosphorus to Lake Erie (Table 15),
whereas the Maumee River accounted for about 12% of the total load.
                                   -67-

-------
            Surface  (pg/l)
            Spring 1978
            Surface Oug/l)
            Summer 1978
FIGURE 24.  DISTRIBUTION OF TOTAL PHOSPHORUS IN  LAKE ERIE-
            WESTERN BASIN
                                -68-

-------
                                         August 19 - August 18, 1978
                                         Epilimnion  (ug/l)
                                         August  19 - August 23, 1978
                                         Hypolimion   (ug/l)
FIGURE 25.  DISTRIBUTION OF TOTAL PHOSPHORUS IN THE CENTRAL AND
            EASTERN BASINS OF LAKE ERIE.
                              -69-

-------
Year
                               TABLE 15

       ESTIMATES OF TOTAL PHOSPHORUS LOADING TO LAKE ERIE
Detroit  River Loading
     To  Lake Erie
    (Metric Tons)
           Loading to Entire Lake
               (Metric Tons)
          IJC
        CCIW
USACOE    IJC
CCIW
Data Sources:
          IJC  (1981)
          Frazer and Willson (1981)
          USACOE, Buffalo District  (1982)
USACOE
1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
32,850
26,280
25,915
15,330
14,600
16,425
11,315
12,045
10,220
6,205
6,205
5,110
4,745
14,309
17,822
17,389
15,422
10,436
12,000
10,548
8,492
6,521
7,991
4,150
4,150




10,488
12,064
11,633
13,169
11,422
10,366
10,065
8,317
6,206
5,450
5,212


23,500
18,033
22,000
19,910
18,263
13,802
15,416
14,560
19,464
11,941
14,855
23,437
27,944
26,977
23,724
18,077
22,271
20,485
16,821
14,534
15,831
11,229
13,894




20,448
20,396
25,726
24,113
22,605
20,268
20,041
20,499
15,336
14,650
12,141
                                 -70-

-------
      Nutrient  distributions  in  the nearshore waters correspond  to  major loadings
source. Tributary mouths in the western basin and south shore of the central basin are
characterized by high concentrations of phosphorus throughout the year (Figure 26).
Other notable locations for high concentrations include the mouth of the Grand River
(Ontario)  and adjacent to Erie, Pennsylvania, both  in the  eastern basin (nearshore
reach nos. 2 and 19, respectively).

      Estimates of total  phosphorus loading to  Lake Erie  have  been  published by
several agencies.  These estimates vary considerably which has led to  some confusion
in relating the  trend of "in-lake" concentrations to changes in the load being delivered
to the lake.  Table  15 provides a comparison of  the loading estimates generated by
IJC, NWRI/CCIW, and USACOE for the period 1967-1980. Estimates from all sources,
except shoreline erosion, are compared graphically in Figure 27 and from  only  the
Detroit River in Figure 28.  All  estimates show a decided decrease  in the load of total
phosphorus to the lake. The  mean annual decline for all three agencies was found to
be 779 +. 12 metric tons.  In the 10-year period from 1971  to  I960, the contribution of
the Detroit River to the  total amount of  phosphorus loaded to Lake  Erie has  fallen
from 67% to 37%.

      It has not been possible to translate the decline in phosphorus loading to Lake
Erie to decreases in  the concentrations or  quantities  of total phosphorus measured in
the lake.   Even when open lake data is filtered to  remove the erratic fluctuations
caused by spring and fall storms (Figure 29) no  significant  changes in central basin
total  phosphorus can be seen  from 1970 to  1982.  In fact, total phosphorus increased in
minimum  summer quantities for the period  1970 to  1976 (Figure 30).  This can be
partially explained by phosphorus releases from  sediment through  wave resuspension
and anoxic regeneration. Several investigations have demonstrated that approximately
80%  of the phosphorus loading  to  Lake Erie becomes incorporated into the bottom
sediments (Burns 1976 and Herdendorf  1980).  Cruise data  for 1978-1980 suggest a
response to decreasing phosphorus  loading with  lower  summer minima and  annual
quantities; however,  1981 and 1982 data show very similar values to the mid-1970s.  If
improvements are to be detected in the lake they should show up first in the western
basin where the greatest decrease in loading has  occurred.   Figure 31  may illustrate
such a trend  for the Ontario shore  adjacent to the mouth of the Detroit River. The
                                       -71-

-------
                  TOTAL  PHOSPHORUS (jug/I)
N5
I
                  20    0    20   40   60
                   I....I....I  11  I   I  I  I
  80
I	I
                          KILOMETERS
               179.6
                            97.1
                                                                                        80 - t
                     FIGURE 26.  MEAN NEARSHORE CONCENTRATIONS OF TOTAL PHOSPHORUS (1978-1979)

-------
Co

I
      en

      o
      h-

      o
      i—*
      a:
CD
2
i—i
a

o


en

CK
o

Q_
en
o
n:
Q_
30000


27000



24000



21000



18000



15000



12000



 9000



 6000



 3000



    0
                                  CCItf

                                  USACOE
                   1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975  1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982


                                                    YEAR



                FIGURE 27.  COMPARISON OF  TOTAL PHOSPHORUS LOADING  ESTIMATES

                             TO LAKE ERIE

-------
-F-
I
      en
      z
      o
      h-

      u
      I—I
      or
      h-
      LU
a
<
o
_j

CO
      a
      X
      CL
      O)
      o
      X
      a.
30000



27000



24000



21000



18000



15000



12000



 9000



 6000



 3000



    0
                                                         CCIV

                                                         USACOE
                   1968 1969 1970 1971  1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980  1981 1982


                                                    YEAR



                FIGURE 28.   COMPARISON  OF  DETROIT RIVER TOTAL PHOSPHORUS LOADING

                             ESTIMATES TO LAKE ERIE

-------
Ul
I
     CD
     CO
     CL-
     IO
     a
     X
     CL
                  1970  1971  1972  1973  1974  1975 1976  1977  1978 1979  1980  1981  1982


                                                 YEAR
               FIGURE 29.   LAKE ERIE TOTAL  PHOSPHORUS CONCENTRATION -

                           EARLY SUMMER EPILIMNION FOR CENTRAL BASIN

-------
12,000


11,000


10.000


9.000


8.000


7,000


6.000


5.000


4.000


3.000


2,000


1.000
Data Sources.

19 70-1972 CCIW
1973-1977 OSU/CLEAR
N78-N79 US EPA/GLNPO
1978-CCIW
N80-N82 OSU/CLEAR
                           -TOTAL PHOSPHORUS

                           - SOLUBLE REACTIVE  PHOSPHORUS
                            \
                               r,
                              i \
 /
CCIW
                                                                       GLNPO   \l
         1970
                  1971
                             1972
                                      1973
                                                 1974
                                                           1975        1976
                                                                               1977
                                                                    1978        1979    '    1980    '     i5ii    '    J982    '
    FIGURE   30.    PHOSPHORUS QUANTITIES  IN  LAKE  ERIE-CENTRAL  BASIN

-------
I
-J
100.0
90.0
80.0
\ 70.0
CD
13
60.0
CO
Z)
• ••™ f" fm fm
o 50.0
i


MM J rt rt
o 40.0
CL
-J 30 0
*~~ wfcJ* KJ
I
h-
o
^ 20.0
10.0
f?l (71
—
-
>-
^ ^


-



—









—
-












i






















«s























Qv
























^






















f

















t—
P
/*-
/
/

16
















-Tj

^UJw
\
\
\






















V
1





















/
(






\









r
y
/
/
/
/
31
















~\
^22
\
\
X
\







1














>











•*

































^ —
85









































•••••


\87

\ ~~\~
\r ^-^Qi45
D32^i" NV T ^r*r''Jk33^
L _J^ \ _^^E3I71 ^-*,,
8
J_
ii i i i i i i
                   1967 1968 1969 1970 1971  1972 1973 1974  1975 1976 1977 1978 1979  1980 1981


                                                  YEAR
                FIGURE 31.   LAKE ERIE TOTAL PHOSPHORUS CONCENTRATION - WESTERN BASIN

                             ONTARIO NEARSHORE TREND

-------
Ontario  Ministry of Environment has  determined  that  the concentration of total
phosphorus in these nearshore waters has decreased approximately 40% in the 10-year
period from  1970 to  1979 which is comparable to the improvements indicated for the
Detroit River in Table 15.

      Nitrogen is the only major dissolved constituent in the waters of Lake Erie which
has  shown a dramatic  increase  in  the past  decade.   Increased  use  of  chemical
fertilizers and gaseous emissions of nitrogen compounds within the drainage  basin are
thought to be the major  causes.  Nitrate plus nitrite loading to the lake has increased
significantly  during  the  period  of  record  (1967 to  1979).  Loading  from the Detroit
River alone averaged 160 metric tons per day  in 1979, more than twice the amount
reported for  1967.  Lake concentrations have also  increased significantly for nitrate
plus nitrite nitrogen  since the first comprehensive  surveys in the  mid-1960s.   Open
lake concentrations  in the western basin for 1963-1965 averaged 120 ug/1 while  the
central and eastern basins averaged 90 ug/1  (FWPCA 1968a).  Concentrations for  the
period 1978-1982 averaged 434 ug/1 for the western basin  and 176 ug/1 for the central
and eastern basins (Table 16).  Trends for the western and  central basin are illustrated
in Figures 32 and 33, respectively, and are summarized below for all three basins:
                   Nitrate + Nitrite Concentrations in Lake Erie
Period
 Western Basin
(ug/1 ± std error)
 Central Basin
(ug/1 + std error)
 Eastern Basin
(ug/1 ± std error)
1963-1965
1970-1975
1978-1982
120
259
434

±24
± 104
90
121
178

± 21
±22
90
113
172

± 12
±8
                                    -78-

-------
                  TABLE 16



LAKE ERIE NITRATE + NITRITE CONCENTRATIONS
Year
1963-
1965
^ 1970
f 1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
Western Basin
Min Max Mean
(ug/1) (ug/1) (ug/1)
fm —
—
53
—
Ill
129
—
—
42
98
—
430
107
..
—
465
—
644
575
--
--
727
796
—
1,149
625
..
120
213
—
275
290
—
--
290
368
--
742
336
Std
Error
„
—
47
—
82
66
—
—
86
101
--
98
87
Central Basin
Min Max Mean
(ug/1) (ug/1) (ug/1)
„
—
18
—
46
101
—
—
88
68
--
143
124

—
135
—
263
195
—
—
238
163
--
369
307
„
90
79
—
142
142
—
--
168
120
--
220
205
Eastern Basin
Std
Error Min Max Mean
(±) (ug/1) (ug/1) (ug/1)
_ 	
	 90
13 57 172 113
—
30
15
__
—
22 156 232 180
12 117 210 164
_„ .-
24
25
Std Cruises
Error (N)
(±) W C E
« _ • •
—
12 10
—
6
6
-_
—
11 8
12 8
__
9
7
^ —
—
10
—
6
6
—
—
7
8
—
9
7
— _
—
10
—
—
--
--
--
7
8
—
--
—

-------
I
CO
o
1200
1100
1000
G 900
CD
a 800
y 700
K 600
^ 500

H 400
^^
^ 300



para
C.VV
100
a
-
-

-






,x
I









^











h1


•






_____ 	 -~
	

10
i i i






-H











1-











I 	


6


































6


i i

















(•-











/



8






j










/
r







«
^
/
'



8




i

;









1

\











\
\












y
\



















                   1965 1970 1971  1972  1973  1974  1975  1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982

                                                  YEAR
                FIGURE 32.   LAKE ERIE NITRATE + NITRITE CONCENTRATIONS - WESTERN BASIN

-------
I
00
       ID
       \~s


       UJ
       H
       i—i

       an
       LJ
       h-
       <
       o:
400



360



320



280



240



200



160



120
              40
                           I	I
                                            1	I	I	I
J	I
                    1965 1970 1971  1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978  1979  1980  1981  1982


                                                    YEAR
                 FIGURE 33.   LAKE ERIE NITRATE «• NITRITE CONCENTRATION -  CENTRAL BASIN

-------
      Chlorophyll and algal biomass. Chlorophyll pigment serves as a useful indicator
of  algal  productivity  in  Lake  Erie.   Annual  mean  concentrations  of  corrected
chlorophyll a  for  the  period 1970  to  1982 are presented in Table  17 and  shown
graphically for the western, central and eastern  basin  on Figures 34, 35  and  36,
respectively.  Like phosphorus no significant trend in chlorophyll concentrations can be
ascertained for the entire period.   However,  when summarize in 5-year periods a
recent decline is apparent:
                     Chlorophyll a Concentrations in Lake Erie
Period
 Western Basin
(ug/1 + std error)
 Central Basin
(ug/1 ± std error)
 Eastern Basin
(ug/1 + std error)
1970-1974
1975-1979
1980-1982
10.9 ± 1.4
12.1 ± 0.5
8.4 ± 0.3
4.4 ± 0.1
5.1 ± 0.3
3.9 ± 0.5
4.5 ± 0.6
3.1 ± 0.2
1.9 ± 0.4
In all three basins, the period 1980 to 1983 is significantly lower in concentrations than
the proceeding 5-year period, with the largest decrease occurring in the western basin.
Again, if improvements  are to  be  detected,  they would first be  expected in the
western basin.

      Typical spring and summer distributions of chlorophyll a in western Lake Erie are
shown in Figure 37.  Concentrations are generally the highest along  the western and
southern shores while the lowest  values are found in the water mass influence by the
Detroit River flow, particularly in spring, and  along the north shore.  In the central
and eastern basins (Figure 38) concentrations are less than half those in the western
basin yielding a strong gradient east of the islands region.  The south shore commonly
has the highest concentrations except in autumn when  mid-lake concentrations can be
highest as a result of nutrients being carried to surface  following turnover.
                                     -82-

-------
                TABLE 17



LAKE ERIE CHLOROPHYLL A CONCENTRATIONS


1
00
U)
1







Year
1970
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
Min
(ug/1)
3.3
8.3
8.8
4.7
6.4
6.5
5.2
4.6
4.2
4.5
3.1
Western
Max
(ug/1)
19.3
12.0
17.1
21.1
16.9
15.1
17.8
17.5
12.8
13.0
16.7
Basin
Mean
(ug/1)
8.6
10.7
13.4
13.7
12.4
10.8
12.5
11.5
8.4
8.3
8.4
Std
Error
(±)
2.7
1.2
1.4
2.4
2.1
4.3
1.5
1.7
1.0
0.8
2.1
Central Basin
Min Max Mean
(ug/1) (ug/1) (ug/1)
2.5
2.4
2.4
2.7
2.5
2.3
2.9
2.5
1.5
2.1
1.5
9.2
7.9
9.4
10.0
8.5
6.0
8.3
7.9
4.6
7.1
5.6
4.5
4.6
4.2
5.9
5.2
4.0
5.2
5.1
3.1
4.9
3.7
Std
Error
(±)
0.7
1.7
1.1
1.1
1.1
0.5
0.7
0.6
0.3
1.5
0.6
Eastern Basin
Min Max Mean
(ug/1) (ug/1) (ug/1)
1.4
2.8
3.3
2.5
—
2.0
1.7
1.4
1.2
—
--
5.4
6.6
7.1
5.9
—
4.4
5.4
3.9
3.6
--
--
3.3
5.1
5.1
3.6
--
3.0
3.2
2.7
1.9
--
—
Std
Error
(±)
0.4
0.9
0.5
0.6
—
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.4
--
—
Cruises
(N)
W C E
10
3
6
6
5
2
8
7
9
9
7
10
3
6
6
5
7
8
7
10
9
7
10
4
6
5
—
6
8
5
6
—
—

-------
I
oo
30.0
27.0
24.0
Cl 21.0
X
CD
3 18.0
<
-j 15.0
N.
>~
I 12.0
LJ
o:
Q
I 0 01
=! y. u

6/«
M
. V
3.0
ra a
-
-
_








-







i











r








^_^— -
__^~ — -^
_^ 	 	 	
1 — ' 	

td
ID
1 1


H

-4









•f

f

-"






r
xt











h-









1

6










-i











L












f)









•^

^1






•••




k






••




^

5











i











r









^






2




j











k























^
i












k












X
7\
\r
h
L









-i
n
k


























^








n
























.7


                   1970  1971  1972  1973 1974  1975  1976  1977 1978  1979  1980  1981  1982
                                                  YEAR
                FIGURE 34.  LAKE  ERIE CHLOROPHYLL A CONCENTRATION - WESTERN BASIN

-------
I
00
Ui
I
_J

>-

Q.
O
o:
      u
           14.0
           12.0
           10. 0
6.0
            4.0
            2.0
0.
          10
                                               A
                                            6
                                              LJ7
                                                                 J8
                                                                            10
                                                                          J7
                          \      \
                                                                     j	i
                   1970 1971  1972  1973  1974  1975 1976  1977 1978  1979  1980  1981  1982
                                                   YEAR
                FIGURE 35.   LAKE ERIE CHLOROPHYLL A CONCENTRATION - CENTRAL  BASIN

-------
I
OO
      CD
      X
      CL
      O
      o:
      o
      _i

      u
15. 0r


13.5



12.0



10.5



 9.0



 7.5



 6.0



 4.5



 3.0



 1.5



 0.0
                   1970  1971  1972 1973  1974  1975 1976  1977  1978  1979 1980  1981  1982


                                                  YEAR
               FIGURE 36.   LAKE ERIE CHLOROPHYLL A CONCENTRATION - EASTERN BASIN

-------
        Surface (jug/I)
        Spring 1 978
       Surface Gug/1)
       Summer 1978
FIGURE  37.  DISTRIBUTION OF CHLOROPHYLL a  IN LAKE ERIE
            WESTERN BASIN
                            -87-

-------
  May 18-May 27,  1978
  Epilimnion  (ugVI)
  July 18-July 29, 1978
  Epilimnion (ug/1)
 October 2U-November 1,  1978
 Epilimnion (ug/1)
FIGURE  38.  DISTRIBUTION OF CHLOROPHYLL
            AND EASTERN BASINS.
IN LAKE ERIE - CENTRAL

-------
      Nearshore concentrations of  chiorophyll a (Figure 39) correspond to the same
 patterns observed for phosphorus (Figure 26).  The most significant difference was for
 Maumee Bay (nearshore reach no. 11) were chlorophyll is high, but proportionally lower
 than phosphorus values.  The high sediment turbidity of these waters is thought to be
 the major cause, resulting in reduced light levels for photosynthesis.

      Volume-weighted cruise mean quantities of chlorophyll a for the period 1970 to
 1982 are plotted on Figure 40.  Although no convincing trend is apparent, the minimum
 and maximum  annual cruise means for the  latter half of  the  period are noticeably
 lower than those for the earlier years.

      During each of  the   two years  of  the  Intensive  Study  the western  basin
 phytoplankton biomass was  dominated by diatoms in the spring and co-dominated  by
 diatoms and blue-greens through the summer  and fall. This pattern is similar to that
 reported for 1970  by Munawar and Munawar (1976).  In the central and eastern basins
 diatoms and  greens  represented   the major  contributors to  the phytoplankton
 commmunity throughout the season. Diatom biomass was high in the early spring and
 in the fall following lake turnover. Green algae dominated in the summer but at a
 lower biomass  than  the  diatom  peaks.     Studies  of  biomass  distribution   by
 USEPA/GLNPO indicate a west-to-east decrease in the standing crop of algae for the
 three basins:

                    Mean Phytoplankton Biomass of Lake Erie
Year

1978
1979
Western Basin
(g/m3)
4.0
9.4
Central Basin
(g/m3)
1.8
3.4
Eastern Basin
(g/m3)
1.2
0.9
The highest concentrations  of  phytoplankton were observed along the  United States
shore of all three basins.
                                    -89-

-------
                 CORRECTED CHLOROPHYLL a^ (jug/I)
vo
O
I
                 20    0
                 I....I....I
20   40
 I  i   I
60
 I
80
 I
                        KILOMETERS
              36.1
                            61.7
                                                     2.0 -  3.9
                                                     1.0 -  5.9

                                                     6.0 -  13.0

                                                     13.1 - 20.0

                                                     20.1 - 40.0


                                                     10.1 - t
                     FIGURE 39.  MEAN NEARSHORE CONCENTRATION  OF CHLOROPHYLL a (1978-1979)

-------
g
V
    5,000
    4,000
    3,000
    2.000
    1.000
                            DaU  Sources
                            1970 CCIW
                            1973-1977  OSU/CLEAR
                            1978-1979  USEPA/CINPO
                            1980-1982  OSU/CLEAR
                                                                                                S
                                                                                                                      I
                    1971
                              1972
                                       1973
                                                1974       1975
                                                                    1976
                                                                             1977
                                                                                       1978
                                                                                                1979
                                                                                                          1980
                                                                                                                   1981
                                                                                                                             1982
        FIGURE  HO.    CHLOROPHYLL  a  QUANTITIES  IN  LAKE ERIE-CENTRAL  BASIN

-------
      The  basin-wide  blooms of  blue-greens  in  western Lake  Erie which  were so
prevalent in the mid-1960s decreased in intensity and number in the 1970s. No basin-
wide blooms were reported during the Intensive Study, although USEPA/GLNPO noted
visible algal blooms in the western basin (up to 17 g/m ) in August, September and
October 1979 with associated whiting presumably due to CaCO- precipitation.  Open
lake phytoplankton analysis, from an index station in each of the three basins between
1970 and  1980, indicates a reduction in total phytoplankton biomass and a composition
shift toward more oligotrophic species. Several eutrophic species were less abundant
in 1979 than in 1970 and two oligotrophic species were first observed in  1979 (Munawar
1981). Analysis of samples from the Kingsville water intake along the  northern shore
of western Lake Erie indicates a marked decline in algal biomass in recent years. This
apparent improvement along the Ontario shore has not been  observed in the Michigan
or Ohio nearshore  water.  This  may  be explained  by the phosphorus decrease in the
Detroit River outflow, which strongly influences the Ontario shore (Figure 2k), versus
high concentrations of phosphorus in the Maumee River and other tributaries which
influence  the United States shore.

      The filamentous,  epilithic green alga Cladophora  glomerata is well-adapted to
rocky littoral  reaches of Lake Erie, as evidenced by its profuse growth.  This alga has
been reported in Lake  Erie since  the  late 1800s, but in the past few  decades it has
become increasingly abundant.  Massive growths of Cladophora have  created  nuisance
accumulations and  obnoxious odors along recreational shores.  It may also clog water
intakes, foul fishing nets and submerged structures,  and impede navigation due to
growths on boat hulls.  Thomas (1975) suggests that the Cladophora starts to become a
nuisance at phosphorus concentrations of 15 ug/1, and it is only above this level that it
interferes with certain water uses, especially recreation and drinking water.  Because
of the high concentrations of phosphorus  in  the nearshore waters of all  three basins
(Figure 26), the  distribution and  abundance of  Cladophora  in Lake Erie is largely
limited by the lack of  suitable substrate.  The most extensive growths of Cladophora
are located in the eastern basin nearshore and the islands region of the western basin
due  to the  large  areas of exposed bedrock.   The  distribution  of  Cladophora  was
quantified in all three basins of  the lake during the Intensive Study. Five sites were
investigated including two in the western basin (Stony  Point, Michigan — Site 1 and
South Bass Island, Ohio — Site 2), one in the central basin (Walnut Creek, Pennsylvania
                                    -92-

-------
 — Site 3) and two in the eastern basin (Hamburg, New York — Site 4 and Rathfon
 Point, Ontario — Site 5).  The results of surveys conducted in 1979 and  1982  are
 summarized below:

                Maximum Standing Crop of Cladophora in Lake Erie
Year

1979
I960
1981
1982
Western
Site 1
(g/m2)
107
186
116
110
Basin
Site 2
(g/m2)
110
218
200
88
Central Basin
Site 3
(g/m2)
24
59


Eastern
Site k
(g/m2)
100
86


Basin
Site 5
(g/m2)
983*
—


*results questionable

From the abundant growth observed along the Ontario shore of the eastern basin, it is
suspected that light attenuation is relatively small here when compared with the more
turbid waters of the western basin where light is a major  limiting factor to Cladophora
growth.  Correspondingly, the  depth of maximum growth  was found to range from 0.5
meters for the western basin to 3.0 meter in the eastern  basin. The lack of sufficient
historical data preclude the establishment of biomss trends for this alga.

      Nearshore and open lake trends. An analysis of  Lake Erie water quality data for
the past decade indicates that Lake Erie is no longer becoming more eutrophic each
year as  has been  reported for  earlier  decades of this  century (Beeton  1961 and 1965).
As discussed earlier, several parameters show modest signs of improvement.

      An analysis  of the United States nearshore waters of the Detroit River indicates
a decreasing  trend in alkalinity,  conductivity,  turbidity,  total  dissolved solids  (TDS),
biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), ammonia,  total Kjeldahl nitrogen, total organic
carbon,  total phosphorus,  soluble phosphorus, phenols, iron, and chloride.  No  trends
                                     -93-

-------
could be detected for silica, organic nitrogen, or total and fecal coliforms.  With the
exception of nitrate plus nitrite, no parameter at this reach is increasing significantly
through time.  Thus,  a general  improvement in the quality of water  appears to be
occurring along the western shore of the river.

      The Livingstone Channel, which  is  considered representative of upper  Great
Lakes water, showed  significant  decreases in conductivity,  ammonia,  total Kjeldahl
nitrogen,  total  organic  carbon,  total  phosphorus,  soluble  phosphorus, phenols  and
chloride.  No significant trends were found  for temperature, turbidity, silica, BOD,
organic nitrogen, nitrate plus nitrite or iron.  Again, a general  improvement in water
quality is  indicated for mid-river flow.

      The Canadian shore of  the Detroit River shows  significant  decreases  in total
organic carbon, total  phosphorus, soluble phosphorus, total coliforms and phenols.  No
significant trends were observed for temperature, dissolved oxygen (DO), turbidity,
TDS, silica, BOD,  organic nitrogen, ammonia,  total Kjeldahl  nitrogen, nitrate  plus
nitrite,  iron or chlorides. Increases through time were  observed for pH, conductivity,
and fecal  coliforms.  Thus, while not as many parameter trends  are significant at  this
site  than  at the other two segments in  the Detroit River, a general improvement in
water quality can be ascertained  by decreases in major nutrient concentrations, total
coliforms, and phenols.

      Monroe, Michigan water intake data show only an  increasing trend in  phenols; all
other parameters of  interest  were either  not present  in the data set or showed no
significant change. Although the data set is limited, the analyses of existing nutrient
and major ion parameters indicates that  water quality at this site in the lake may not
have changed significantly within the period of record.

      Data from samples collected  at the mouth of  the Maumee River (Toledo, Ohio)
indicate significant decreases in nitrate  and total phosphorus.  These results  may
reflect  a  decreased nutrient  load from  the Maumee River watershed.  The data  also
revealed decreasing trends in pH and alkalinity, suggesting that some acidification is
occurring.  DO is  decreasing while BOD is increasing through time, indicating an
increase in the amount of biologically oxidizable organic matter in  the Maumee River
                                    -94-

-------
estuary. DO levels  in the lower Maumee River frequently violate IJC water quality
objectives.   No  significant  trends were evident  for  temperature,  conductivity,
turbidity, IDS, or ammonia.

      Because of the estuarine conditions at the mouth of the Maumee River, samples
taken there may be poor indicators of Maumee River nutrient and sediment loads.  It is
noteworthy that the Maumee  River  carries about  38% as much nitrate as the Detroit
                                             2
River although its average discharge at  2200 m /sec is only 3% of the Detroit River
flow.  Historical records for nitrate concentrations in the Maumee River also show a
significant increase.

      Data collected from the Cleveland, Ohio Crown water intake from 1974 to  1980
indicated significant increases in temperature,  alkalinity,  total organic carbon, and
fecal coliforms, as well as  significant decreases in pH and turbidity.  No signficiant
trend  was   evident  in  DO, conductivity,  nitrates, ammonia,  total  phosphorus,  or
chloride. Thus the water quality at this location does not appear to be changed greatly
over the period of record.

      Erie,   Pennsylvania  water  intake  data show  a significant  decrease in pH,
alkalinity, total and fecal coliforms, iron,  and chloride values.  No significant trends
were evident for temperature or total phosphorus values.  The only parameters which
indicated an increase through time were DO and turbidity.

      Data  from the Black Rock Canal at Buffalo,  New York (discharge of the Buffalo
River) indicated a significant  increase in pH and  a significant decrease in  chlorides.
No other changes were evident indicating no  detectable changes in  water quality
parameters  over the period  of record (1969-1980).  Decreasing  trends in pH, organic
nitrogen and chlorides were found for the  Niagara River downstream from  the Black
Rock Canal. Soluble phosphorus was the  only parameter for which an increasing trend
was  discerned.   No  significant  trend could  be  found  for temperature, alkalinity,
conductivity, turbidity, BOD, nitrates, ammonia,  total coliforms, phenols, or  iron.  The
Niagara  River  at  Lake Ontario  showed no significant increase or decrease in pH,
alkalinity, DO,  turbidity, organic  nitrogen,  nitrate, ammonia, total coliforms, or iron.
The only significant  trends which could be discerned were  an increase in temperature
                                    -95-

-------
and decreases in conductivity and chloride.  Thus, in respect to these components, the
Niagara River system does not appear to have changed significantly  during the  last
decade.

      Two recent statistical studies have been completed to determine the existence
of open  lake water quality trends  in  Lake Erie.   Kasprzyk (1983)  analyzed total
phosphorus and chlorophyll a data for the period 1974 to 1980  and El-Shaarawi (I983b)
looked at these parameters plus several others for  the  period 1968 to 1980.  In both
studies the western, central and eastern basins were analyzed separately.  Kasprzyk
only used data from the non-stratified period (spring and fall) whereas  El-Shaarawi
used the approach of adjusting the  entire annual data set for seasonal  variatons.  The
essential results of these studies are summarized below:
                           Trends in Total Phosphorus
Investigator   Basin
Data Set
Trend
Kasprzyk
Western
Central (west)

Central (east)
Eastern

1974-80
1974-80

1974-79
1974-79

Insufficient data
Spring - decreasing;
Fall - none
None
None
El-Shaarawi
              Western

              Central
              Eastern
1968,70-72,77,78

1968,70-72,77-80
1968, 70-72, 77, 78, 80
Increasing 1968-71;
Decreasing 72-78
Decreasing 1968-80
Decreasing 1968-80
                                     -96-

-------
                             Trends in Chlorophyll a
 Investigator   Basin
Data Set
Trend
Kasprzyk
El-Shaarawi
              Western          1974-80
              Central (west)    1974-80

              Central (east)     1974-80
              Eastern
              Western
              Central
              Eastern
1974-79
1968,70,72
1968,70,79,80
1968,70,72,80
None
Spring - none;
Fall - decreasing
Spring - none;
Fall - decreasing
Spring - none;
Fall - decreasing
Increasing 1968-72*
Decreasing 1970-80
Decreasing 1968-80
*Non-significant, increasing trend
These advanced statistical studies have yielded some  significant, but not dramatic,
water quality trends for the past decade. These trends are in general agreement with
those found by the Technical Assessment  Team  as discussed earlier  in  this report
(Figures 21-23 and 34-36).

     Long-term trends  in  the rate  at  which oxygen is depleted in the summer
hypolimnion of Lake Erie  has been  a recent topic of debate within the scientific
community.  Carr (1962) suggested  that oxygen  consumption was  increasing in the
                                     -97-

-------
central basin.  Dobson and Gilbertson (1972) agreed with this general conclusion and
calculated a trend of 0.079 mg/l/day for the period  1930-1970.  Charlton (1979), on the
other hand, after standardizing the depletion rate to account for physical factors such
as temperature and hypolimnion thickness, concluded  that there  was no significant
trend in the dissolved oxygen consumption rate.  Burns and Rosa (1981) supported the
hypothesis  of  an  increasing  long-term  trend  by  accounting  for  other  physical
parameters, including temperature, vertical  mixing, and incoming oxygen resulting
from the entrainment of eastern basin water.  The most resent study is a statistical
model developed for dissolved oxygen concentrations in the hypolimnion of the central
basin using data collected  by CCIW during the period 1967-1979 (El-Shaarawi I983a).
Using  water level,  hypolimnion temperature and total  phosphorus  as explanatory
variables, it was found that depletion rate is  completely independent  of temperature
and depends only on water level and total phosphorus.  However, the  initial dissolved
oxygen concentration in the hypolimnion was  found to be  a function of temperature,
total  phosphorus and water level.   When the model was used to show  the historical
trend in the oxygen depletion rate, after the removal of  the effect of temperature and
water  level, it  was concluded that  the increase in depletion is related to the  increase
in the level of  total phosphorus.  Further, when-the model was used to estimate the
probability  of  anoxia  in the central basin as a function of  the three explanatory
variables, it was concluded that there is "always" a high chance for the occurrence of
anoxia and  this chance increases with the increase in  the level  of total phosphorus.
The  final conclusion of the study was that  "it is possible  to  improve  the anoxic
conditions in the lake by controlling total  phosphorus loading."  The conclusions of El-
Shaarawi  (I983a) are consistent  with  those of the Technical Assessment Team  as
discussed in the Dissolved Oxygen and Nutrients sections of this report.
                                     -98-

-------
Toxic Substances
     Toxic pollutants are introduced to Lake Erie through municipal and  industrial
point  source  wastewater   discharges,  atmospheric  deposition,  and   urban  and
agricultural land runoff.  In  Lake Erie, interlake transfer via the connected channels
(Detroit and  Niagara  rivers)  can  also  be a  significant source  of contaminants.
Preliminary data indicate that nine  heavy meals (Cd,  Cr, Cu, Pb, Mn, Hg, Ni, Ag and
Zn)  and six organic  pollutants (benzene, chloroform,  methylene  chloride,  bis [2
ethylexyl]  phthalate,  tetrachloroethylene, and  toluene) were  found in nearly  all
effluents from major municipal wastewater treatment plants in the Lake Erie basin.
The  International Joint Commission (1979) has compiled an inventory of the major
municipal and industrial point source discharges to Lake Erie. The total annual load to
Lake Erie from these sources for four trace metals is summarized below:
                     Annual Trace Metals Loading to Lake Erie
             Metal     Municipal Sources         Industrial Sources
                         (metric tons)              (metric tons)
             Zn              228.2                    148.6

             Pb               50.7                     38.2

             Cu               50.7                     43.4

             Cd               15.2                      0.3

     Data from the 1979 main lake surface sediment survey indicate that some metals
are highly concentrated offshore from  tributary mouths near  major industrial areas.
Lead, nickel, copper,  silver, vanadium,  mercury  (Figure  41),  zinc, cadmium,  and
                                     -99-

-------
MERCURV
D
                                                THAN  300 Pp8
                                           300 - ggg




                                           1000 - 2000




                                          GREATER THAN
                                             ,N LAKE
                     -100-

-------
chromium show elevated levels offshore from the Detroit River.  Mercury (Figure
is also high along the Pennsylvania/New York shoreline.  Zinc and cadmium show high
concentrations off Cleveland, Ohio and Erie, Pennsylvania.  Chromium is  also high
near  Buffalo,  New  York.   The  distribution of metal  in  the  open  lake  sediments
indicated highest mean concentrations corresponding to the major depositional zones
particularly evident  in the  sink areas of  the central and eastern basins.  It is evident
that the western basin sediments are eventually transported into the  adjoining basins
with the net movement from west to east.

      Drynan (1982)  points  out that combined sewer overflows are an  additional point
source  of toxic substances for which little or no information is currently available.  It
is very difficult to  sample and obtain flow measurements  for these highly variable
discharges in order to make estimates  of the total  quantities  of  pollutants they
introduce into the lakes. In some of the major metropolitan areas, such as Detroit and
Cleveland, with combined sewers these discharges  may be significant, particularly  in
terms of local water quality impacts.  However, neither these contributions to total
pollutant loadings nor impacts to whole lake water quality have been quantified.

      With further controls on point  source discharges, it  is becoming increasingly
apparent that diffuse sources,  urban and agricultural land drainage,  and long range
atmospheric  transport  and deposition must  be given  more consideration  in  water
quality management plans.  Although the quantification of atmospheric deposition of
trace  metals  and organic  substances to Lake Erie is hampered by  a number  of
problems, Drynan (1982) concluded that it  is possible to use approximations of wet and
dry components to  estimate total deposition.   His estimates  for selected airborne
substances are summarized below:
                                     -101-

-------
               Annual Deposition of Airborne Substances in Lake Erie
Trace
Metal

Pb
Cu
Cd
Ni
Fe
Al
Mn
Zn

Metric
Tons

754
151
75
75
3,270
#
*
*

Organic
Compound
Total PCB
Total DDT
o-BHC
Y-BHC
Dieldrin
HCB
p,p' Methoxychlor
o-Endosulfan
|3-Endosulfan
Total PAH
Metric
Tons
3.1
0.19
1.1
5.0
0.17
0.53
2.6
2.5
2.5
51.0
Organic
Compound
Anthracene
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
Benz(a) athracene
Perylene
Benzo(a) pyrene
DBP
DEHP
Total organic carbon

Metric
Tons
1.5
1.5
2.6
1.3
1.5
2.5
5.0
5.0
66,000

* Estimates not possible from available data

      Shipboard collection of aerosol samples was undertaken as part of the Lake Erie
Intensive Study to assess the contribution of atmospheric dry loading of aerosol trace
elements and nutrients to the lake (Sievering 1982).  Preliminary estimates of loading
to Lake Erie are summarized below:
                  Annual Atmospheric Dry Loading to Lake Erie
Element
Pb
Zn
Cd
Cu
Metric Tons
75-175
4-9
3-7
Element
                                          Metric Tons
                        Cr
                        Ni
                        SO,
                     5-12
                     4-8
                     30,000-70,000
The range in values shown are considered to be the 25% and 75% confidence limits of
these estimates.


     Sediment cores taken at the mouth of the Detroit River and in western Lake Erie

in 1971 yielded  surface mercury values,up to 3.8 ppm and generally decreased in
                                     -102-

-------
 concentration  exponentially  with  depth  (Figure  41).   High  surface values were
 attributed to waste discharge from chlor-alkali  plants on the  Detroit and  St. Clair
 rivers which operated during the period 1950 to 1970.  Several years after these plants
 diminished  operation the area  was again cored with analyses showing  that  recent
 deposits covered the highly contaminated sediment with a thin  layer of new material
 which had mercury concentrations approaching background  levels (O.I ppm).   As  a
 result of these discharges, mercury in fish of Lake St. Clair and western Lake Erie was
 a major contaminant problem in the early 1970s.  Levels of  total mercury in walleye
 (Stizostedion vitreum vitreum) collected from Lake St. Clair have declined from over
 2 ug/g in 1-970 to 0.5 ug/g in  1980.  In western Lake Erie,  1968 levels of mercury were
 0.84 ug/g as compared to only  0.31 ug/g in 1976.  The rapid environmental  response
 subsequent  to  the  cessation of the point source discharges at Sarnia, Ontario and
 Wyandott,  Michigan can be attributed to rapid flushing of the St.  Clair-Detroit River
 system, the high load of suspended sediment delivered to western Lake Erie, and the
 high rate of productivity in the western basin (International Joint Commission  1981).

      Fish  contaminant surveys of Lake  Erie  and its tributaries  in the  late  1970s
 indicate  few  contamination problems, and these are usually associated with site
 specific areas. The highest concentration and the greatest number of organochlorine
 contaminants  in fish samples were found in  the River Raisin and the Maumee River.
 Excessive concentrations (i.e. 1.0 ppm for pesticides, 5.0 ppm for total PCBs) of the
 following contaminants were found:  -BHC (Ashtabula River) and total PCBs  (River
 Raisin, Maumee River, and  Sandusky River).  All other contaminants were at low
 concentrations (less  than 1.0  ppm).   Levels of  PCB and  DDT in spottail shiners
 (Notropis hudsonius) and in herring gull (Larus argentatus) eggs have declined in the
 past decade, illustrating a system-wide response to controls  on  production and use of
 these compounds.  PCB levels in shiners at  Point Pelee, Ontario,  dropped from 844
 ng/g in  1975 to 150 ng/g in 1980 while during the same period DDT fell  from  92 to 21
 ng/g. At Port Colborne, Ontario, gull eggs showed similar declines in PCB and DDT
 residues, but of a lesser magnitude (International Joint Commission 1981).

Public Health
     Bacteria contaminated wastewater inputs to the lake pose a direct health hazard
near metropolitan centers such as Port Clinton, Lorain, Cleveland, Dunkirk,  Buffalo,
                                     -103-

-------
 Port  Stanley, and  Port Burwell.   As seen  below,  studies by USEPA/GLNPO show
 approximately 16% of all beaches along the Lake Erie shore were either permanently
 or  temporarily  restricted  from use, particularly  for  water  contact recreational
 activities, during the period 1978-1981:
                         Lake Erie Recreational Beaches
Jurisdiction
          Beaches Temporarily      Beaches
Beaches         Closed or          Permanently
Monitored      Restricted            Closed
Michigan
Ohio
Pennsylvania
New York
Ontario
7
52
40
26
it
0
8
1
5
2
0
4
0
0
0
     In the past decade, significant  progress has been  made in removing bacterial
contamination from the shoreline.  In  the late 1960s, 11 bathing beaches on the United
States  side of the lake  were posted unsafe  because  of high bacterial contamination.
Another  12 beaches  were deemed as  questionable because  of  moderate bacterial
pollution and 27 were considered generally safe with  only slight pollution.  Only three
beaches were  found to  be uncontaminated throughout  the swimming season (FWPCA
1968b). By contrast,  the above data show that over 100 beaches are now safe.  For
example, in the late 1970s the beach  at Sterling State Park (near Monroe, Michigan),
after  a  20-year closure,  was  reopened  when  coliform  bacteria  levels  reached
compliance for  body  contact recreation.   The major bacterial problems that  still
persist are often associated  with storm  water overflows,  such as at Cleveland, Ohio
where  heavy  flows are  delivered directly to the Cuyahoga River, contaminating the
nearshore waters surrounding the metropolitan area.
                                     -104-

-------
Land Use Activities
     The United States portion of the Lake Erie basin includes 12.5 million acres (5.1
million hectares), of which over half is cropland. In the western portion of the basin,
nearly 70 percent of the land is cropland.  The soils of this area are favorable for row
crop production with corn and soybeans dominating cropland usage.  The U.S. Army
Corps of Engineer's  Lake Erie Wastewater Management Study (Yaksich 1982) showed
that the effect of land use activities on water quality  is a complex  relationship,
although the following generalizations were confirmed and recommendations proposed:

     1.  The rivers which drain into western and central Lake Erie are hydrologically
         active throughout their entire  watersheds and contribute diffuse  loads of
         phosphorus to the lake.

     2.  The mean ratio of total phosphorus to suspended solids in northwestern Ohio
         streams was 2.17 g/kg.  Of this total, 25% was soluble phosphorus,  which
         was readily available for algal growth, and 75% was  particulate phosphorus,
         which is partially available.  In  general, higher concentrations of suspended
         solids resulted in lower phosphorus to suspended solids ratios.

     3.   Particulate and  soluble  phosphorus  entering stream  systems disappears
         rapidly from  flowing water; however,  it is  resuspended and transported
         downstream as particulate phosphorus during later storm events. Therefore,
         the process of transporting phosphorus from basin cropland to Lake  Erie may
         require a considerable period of  time.

     4.   The western basin  and southwestern  portion of the central  basin of Lake
         Erie have algal growth problems which will require phosphorus reductions in
         addition  to those being  provided (or projected) by point source removal. A
         program for  control  of   phosphorus from  diffuse   sources  is  therefore
         recommended which  has  the lowest cost per unit quantity  of phosphorus
         stopped from reaching the lake.  Conservation tillage on suitable soils  is the
         most cost-effective means of reducing sediment phosphorus  loads  to Lake
         Erie.
                                     -105-

-------
5.  The implementation  of a  conservation  tillage program could ultimately
    achieve a 2,000 mt/yr  reduction in total phosphorus loading to Lake  Erie.
    The Great Lakes Water Quality  Agreement of 1978 calls for an additional
    target phosphorus reduction for  Lake  Erie of  2,000 metric tons  per year
    beyond the  achievement  of a  1.0 mg/1  effluent  concentration  for  all
    municipal wastewater treatment plants currently discharging more than 1
    million gallons per day. The United States portion of  this reduction should
    be  1,700 mt/yr.  A conservation  tillage program will  more  than reach this
    goal at a benefit/cost ratio of 10:1.

6.  A  new  base-year tributary phosphorus  load  to Lake  Erie should  be
    recognized; inclusion of tributary  monitoring data from  1978-1980 in the
    computation gives a base-year total phosphorus load of 16,455 mt/yr. When
    the 1.0 mg/1 effluent limitation has been achieved the total  phosphorus load
    to Lake  Erie will be 15,025 mt/yr.  At that time an additional phosphorus
    reduction of 4,025 mt/yr (not 2,000 mt/yr  as  stated above) will be  required
    to meet the  11,000 metric tons per year total loading objective of the Water
    Quality Agreement. The United States  allocation of this reduction objective
    should be approximately 2,800 mt/yr.  To reach this reduction objective, an
    additional 770 mt/yr  in reductions beyond the Agreement program  must be
    achieved  through  point  source  controls  beyond  the  1.0  mg/1  effluent
    limitation.   This  would cost an  estimated  $5  million  annually.   The
    benefit/cost ratio of a conservation tillage  program is 17:1 compared to a
    program requiring the entire  reduction to  be achieved by point source
    control.

7.  Relatively small amounts of agricultural pesticides reach water bodies via
    runoff (normally less than  2% of  the  application or as high  as 6% after
    intense rainfall).  Pesticides generally used in the  Lake Erie basin are not
    inhibitory to invertebrates or fish at runoff concentrations; however, algae
    and aquatic  macrophytes may be inhibited at stream  concentrations.  The
    increased usage of pesticides with  conservation tillage is  not expected to
    result  in increased pesticide  runoff  since  erosion and runoff would be
    decreased.
                                 -106-

-------
 Lake Responses to Remedial Actions
      The water from Lake Erie sustains the vast industrial complex which extends
 from Detroit to Buffalo.  Water  returned to the lake is highly enriched by municipal,
 agricultural, and industrial waste  products.   Studies  conducted in the  late  1920s
 revealed that the lake was  already moderately rich in nutrients  and  was experiencing
 phytoplankton  blooms in its western basin.   Adjacent to the Detroit River mouth,
 pollution-sensitive mayflies were being replaced by tubificid worms.  By the mid-1950s
 thermal stratification  was  resulting  in  oxygen depletion in the bottom  water and
 mayfly nymphs suffered catastrophic  mortality.  The concentration of all the major
 ions, including nutrients such as phosphorus and nitrogen, showed a marked increase
 during this period of time.

      In the early 1960s  Lake Erie gained the reputation as a  "dead  lake"  with its
 western basin the consistency of "pea soup" due to dense  algal mats which left green
 wakes behind motorboats.  Most municipal beaches were closed owing to high coliform
 bacteria counts  or  were rendered unusable  by  reeking  masses  of decaying  algae
 (largely Cladophora glomerata).  One of its major tributaries, the Cuyahoga River, was
 so polluted by industrial wastes that it periodically caught fire.  Anoxia in  the central
 basin had caused the extirpation  of virtually all cold-water fish species, and detergent
 foam at the eastern end of the lake resulted in a disgusting spectacle in  the plunge
 pool of Niagara Falls.

      The concept of nutrient control for  Lake Erie  appears  to have had its  origin in
 1965,  when the U.S.  Department  of Health, Education and  Welfare  convened a
 conference  on the pollution of  Lake Erie  and its tributaries under the authority
 granted in the Water Pollution Control  Act of 1961.  One of the recommendations
 forthcoming from the conference was that a "technical committee"  be established to
 evaluate water quality problems related to  nutrients in Lake Erie and to make
 recommendations to the conferees. In late 1965, the Lake  Erie Enforcement Technical
 Committee was formally established to explore the problems related to nutrients and
over-enrichment of Lake Erie. The committee received information and advice from
leading authorities in water-oriented disciplines.  After a year of study, a final report
was  issued which concluded that the major  pollution problems in  Lake  Erie result
directly or indirectly from  excess algae and that these  growths are stimulated by
nutrients resulting from human activities.
                                      -107-

-------
     The technical  committee  recommended  that  water  quality  objectives  be
established that would prevent nuisance algae conditions, particularly by  lowering the
phosphate and nitrogen levels in the lake.  The committee further recommended that
new treatment processes be developed and employed to effect high phosphate removal.
Based on these recommendations  the Federal Water Pollution Control Administration
(FWPCA), later the Federal Water Quality Administration (FWQA), and more recently
the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), as well as state and local agencies, have
embarked on a program to control the flow of nutrients and toxic substances to Lake
Erie.  The necessity for  this control was reinforced by  findings of the  International
Joint Commission, resulting in the Canada-United States Water Quality Agreements of
1972 and 1978.

     Nature of remedial actions. Today Lake Erie  is beginning to respond to massive
clean-up efforts started two decades ago.  New sewage treatment plants have been
constructed  throughout the drainage  basin and old plants have been  modified to
remove  phosphates through tertiary treatment.  Industries have been forced to reduce
waste loads  to the lake or in some  instances cease  operation, as in the case of chlor-
alkali plants which discharged  excessive amounts of waste mercury.  Production and
use of several toxic organic compounds have been banned. Agricultural practices are
being modified to  lessen soil loss  to tributaries and to reduce fertilizer and pesticide
requirements. The more significant actions include the following:

     1.    Detergent Modifications
          During the late 1960s and early 1970s, the province of Ontario and all of the
          Great Lakes states,  with the exception of Ohio and Pennsylvania, enacted
          legislation  limiting  the  amount of  phosphorus  permitted  in household
          detergents.  A concentration of 0.5%  phosphorus is permitted in the United
          States and  2.2% in Canada.  In Ohio,  where no  controls  are in  effect,
          phosphorus concentrations of 5.5% are typical.

     2.    Point source controls
          The most significant improvement in lowering phosphorus delivery to Lake
          Erie has been made in  the loading from  point sources.  The  point source
          loading has  decreased from 11,900 mt/yr in 1970 to 4,500 mt/yr in 1980, as a
                                      -108-

-------
          result of the implementation of phosphorus effluent limitations to 1.0 mg/1
          at wastewater treatment plants (Yaksich 1982).  In 1971, total phosphorus
          loading  from the Detroit River accounted for 67% of the total load to the
          lake; by 1980, improvements in treatment had lowered this to 37% (Table
          15).

      3.   Soil conservation
          The practice of conservation tillage has expanded  rapidly in the Lake Erie
          basin  throughout the last decade.  In the  early 1970s little  conservation
          tillage was in use, but by 1981, reduced tillage was being practiced on 22%
          of the basin's cropland, and no tillage was used  on ^%.  Besides changing
          tillage,  several other  agricultural practices (e.g.  method  of  fertilizer
          application, pesticide usage, planting techniques,  and establishing green-
          belts along streams) have been altered,  resulting in less soil loss  and some
          reduction of phosphorus deliver  to the lake.

      4.   Fishery  management
          Several  fish  species have been extirpated from Lake Erie as a  result of
          environmental changes, over-exploitation, or a combination of these factors.
          Prudent  management  programs,  such  as the suspension  of  commercial
          fishing for selected  species, have  enhanced the population of sport fish.
          Commercial  and   recreational  harvests,  environmental  changes  and
          management  programs will  continue to affect the  fish community as  a
          whole.  To a large extent, the structure of Lake Erie's fish community in the
          future will depend to a large degree on public perception of what  structure
          would be most economically advantageous.

      Positive responses.  Annual monitoring  programs initiated in the  early  1970s,
coupled with  observations during  the  1978-1979  Intensive Study, are  beginning to
provide some evidence of water quality improvement and possible lake recovery. The
first signs of a positive response to remedial programs have not been dramatic, but
considering that the pollution of the lake  also took place over many decades,  a rapid
recovery should not be  expected.  Some of the most promising indicators of  improved
lake conditions are presented below.  Cause and effect relationships for  all of these
                                      -109-

-------
changes  are  not well understood nor can these changes be attributed to specific
remedial actions:

      1.   Lake Levels
              Water levels in Lake Erie  during the past decade have averaged 0.5 m
          above the 1960-1970 levels.  The difference between the lowest year (196*)
          and the highest year (1973) was  1.1 m, an increase  of approximately 7% in
          volume.  The dilution effect of more upper Great Lakes water flowing into
          Lake Erie,  coupled with greater submergence of algal attachment sites, is
          thought  to  be partially responsible for  the absence  of  basin-wide  algal
          blooms and  massive growths of the filamentous algae, Cladophora, that were
          so prevalent in the mid-1960s.

     2.   Dissolved Substances
              Nearshore records for the  period 1900 to 1960 in central Lake Erie show
          dramatic increases in conductivity, chloride, calcium, sulfate, and sodium
          plus potassium (Beeton 1961 and 1965).   From 1966 to  1980 conductivity
          (Figure 20) values indicate a decline in the  total  amount of dissolved
          substances in central Lake Erie, falling approximately 8% during this period.
          Chloride (Figure 20) shows a more  dramatic  improvement,  dropping about
          26% from a concentration of 25.0 mg/1 in 1966 to 18.* mg/1 in 1979.  Much
          of this decline can be attributed to elimination of waste brine pollution from
          the Grand River near  Painesville, Ohio in the early 1970s.   In the eastern
          basin, Presque Isle Bay at Erie,  Pennsylvania, has experienced  a  marked
          decrease in alkalinity (largely bicarbonate ions) falling from  96 ppm in 19*5
          to 87 ppm in 1978.  Other conservative ions (i.e. calcium, sodium, and suifate)
         have ceased  to increase in the lake and have remained relatively stable  over
         the past decade.

    3.   Phosphorus Loading
             Loading  of  total phosphorus  to  Lake  Erie declined markedly during the
         past decade.  The  1971  loading to the  entire lake,  from all sources except
         shore  erosion,  was  approximately 18,800 metric tons.  By  1980, the total
         phosphorus load  had decreased to  an estimated 13,500  metric tons.   The
                                     -110-

-------
    Detroit River, which supplies about 90% of the inflowing water to Lake Erie,
    has shown a remarkable  improvement;  phosphorus  loadings decreased  60%
    during the same period, primarily as a result of  improvements to the Detroit
    wastewater treatment plant.

        In the early 1970s, the concentration of phosphorus in influent wastewater
    to municipal treatment plants averaged about 10 mg/1  within the Lake  Erie
    drainage basin and the  mean effluent concentration was  approximately 7 mg/1.
    By 1980, many plants had installed phosphorus removal systems which resulted
    in an  average  effluent concentration of 1.6 mg/1  for all Ohio  plants and
    concentrations as low as 0.6 mg/1  for the Detroit sewage treatment plant in
    1982 (Drynan 1982).

4.  Phosphorus Concentrations
        Concentrations of  total phosphorus in western Lake  Erie have not declined
    as noticeably as loadings, but some improvement has been documented for the
    north  shore  of the  western  basin  (Figure  31).   Elsewhere  in the  lake
    concentration have been relatively stable  since  1970.   If  the  monitored
    phosphorus  concentration  decreases  are representative  of the  total  load
    coming from that source,  the  lake water quality  should eventually improve
    with diminished concentrations of phosphorus and chlorophyll.

5.  Hypolimnion Oxygen
        In  the  central basin  of  Lake  Erie, the rate  of  hypolimnetic oxygen
    depletion more than doubled between 1930 and the mid-1970's.  In 1930, the
    volumetric rate has been estimated at 0.054 mg/l/day (Dobson and Giibertson
    1971), while  in  197* it was measured at 0.130  mg/l/day.   During the same
    period the area of the basin subjected to anoxic conditions rose from 300 km
    in 1930 to 10,250 km2 in 1974. Cruises conducted from 1980 to 1982 show that
    the demand rate has dropped to an average of 0.101  mg/l/day and the area of
                                     2
    anoxia has been reduced to 4,870 km  .
                                 -Ill-

-------
6.  Toxic Metals and Organic Compounds
        Sediment cores taken at the mouth of  the Detroit River and in western
    Lake  Erie  in  1971  yielded  surface  mercury  concentrations up  to  3.8  ppm
    (Walter et  al.  1974) and generally decreased exponentially with  depth  to
    background concentrations of  less than O.I  ppm.  High surface  values were
    attributed to waste discharge during  the period 1950  to  1970 from chlor-alkali
    plants on the Detroit and St. Clair rivers.  In 1977,  several years after these
    plants diminished operation  the area was again cored.  Analyses  showed that
    recent deposits  were covering  the highly contaminated sediment with a thin
    layer   of   new  material  which had  mercury  concentrations  approaching
    background levels (Wilson and Walters 1978).

        Mercury in fish of Lake St.  Clair and western Lake Erie was a major
    contaminant problem in the early  1970s.  Levels of  total mercury in walleye
    (Stizostedion vitreum vitreum)  collected from Lake St. Clair have declined
    from over 2 ug/g in 1970 to 0.5 ug/g in  1980. In western  Lake Erie, 1968 levels
    of mercury were 0.84 ug/g as compared to only 0.31 ug/g in 1976 (International
    Joint Commission  1981).  The rapid environmental  response subsequent to the
    cessation  of the point  source discharges at  Sarnia, Ontario and Wyandott,
    Michigan can be attributed  to  rapid flushing  of the St.  Clair-Detroit River
    system and the high load of suspended sediment  delivered to western Lake
    Erie.

        Levels of  PCB and  DDT in spottail shiners (Notropis hudsonius) and in
    herring gull (Larus argentatus) eggs  have  declined  in  the past decade,
    illustrating a system-wide response to controls on  production and use of these
    compounds.  PCB  levels in  shiners at  Point Pelee dropped from 844 ng/g in
     1975 to 150 ng/g in I960 while  during the same period DDT fell from 92 to 21
    ng/g  (International Joint Commission  1981).  At Port Colborne,  gull  eggs
    showed similar declines in PCB  and DDT residues, but lesser in magnitude.

7.  Algal Density and Composition
        The  basin-wide  blooms  of  planktonic  blue-green  algae  (Microcystis,
    Aphanizomenon and Anabaena) in western Lake Erie and massive growths of an
                               -112-

-------
    attached, filamentous green  algae  (Cladophora glomerata)  which were  so
    prevalent in the  mid-1960s, have decreased in intensity and number in the
    1970s.  No basin-wide blooms  have been reported in recent years.  Open lake
    phytoplankton analysis between 1970 and 1980 indicates a reduction in total
    phytoplankton  biomass  and a composition  shift  toward  more  oligotrophic
    species.  Eutrophic species (i.e. Melosira granulata, Stephanodiscus  tenius and
    S.  niagara) were less abundant in 1979 than in 1970, and oiigotrophic species
    (i.e. Dinobryon divergens  and  Ochromonas scintillans) were first observed in
    1979 (International Joint Commission 1981; Munawar 1981).

8.  Benthic Communities
        The  composition of  the benthic  macroinvertebrate  communities  of
    western  Lake Erie has improved since 1967.  Samples taken in 1979, when
    compared with  1967 data, showed  that the  bottom is still dominated  by
    pollution tolerant  tubificids (i.e. Limnodrilus hoffmeisteri, L. cervix and  L.
    maumeensis); however, other  less tolerant taxa of tubificids (i.e. Peloscolex
    spp.) were also common.  The density of tubific worms declined sharply at the
                                                       2                   2
    mouth of the Detroit River between  1967 (13,000/m  ) and  1979 (2,400/m ),
    while the number at the mouth of the Maumee River has remained constant.
    Midge (Chironomidae) larvae represented only 6% of the western basin benthic
    population in 1967  but  rose   to  20%  by   1979  (Ontario  Ministry of the
    Environment 1981), replacing some of the tubificids.

        A  modest reestablishment of  the  burrowing mayfly (Hexagenia limbata)
    has been observed at the mouth  of the  Detroit River and adjacent areas  of
  ' western Lake Erie.  This species was  extirpated from the western basin in the
    mid-1950s following periods of anoxia in this normally unstratified portion  of
    the lake.   Prior to  1953,  bottom sediments yielded about  400  nymphs per
    square  meter in the Bass Islands region (Britt 1956 and 1973).  Following the
    catastrophic kills of the  1950s, no Hexagenia  nymphs were found in  Lake  Erie
    sediments for over 20 years.   In  1979,  20 nymphs were collected  near the
    mouth of the Detroit River (Ontario Ministry of the Environment 1981) and for
    the past several years a small emergence of adults has been observed on South
    Bass Island.
                                 -113-

-------
     9.  Fishery
              The annual sport angler harvest of  fish in  the Ohio waters of Lake Erie
         has increased from 5.2 million kg in 1975  to 7.3 million kg in 1982, an increase
         of 40% (Ohio Division of Wildlife 1983).  During this eight-year period, yellow
         perch  (Perca flavescens) harvests rose from  3.7 million kg to 5.5 million kg,
         while  walleye  (Stizostedion vitreum  vitreum)  production jumped  from 0.5
         million kg to  1.4 million  kg.   The  increased  walleye production  has  been
         attributed  to   good  young-of-the-year   recruitment  and  international
         management approaches  to control  sport  and commercial  harvests.   The
         abundance of walleye within  western Lake  Erie also increased dramatically
         from 1970 to 1982. During the 1960s and early 1970s  the "fishable" population
         of walleye, 14.5 inches (36.8 cm)  in length and larger, was estimated at or
         below  two million individuals.  In 1982, the fishable population in western Lake
         Erie was estimated at over 25 million walleye (Ohio Division of Wildlife 1983).

     10. Bathing Beaches
              In 1967, 11 Lake Erie bathing beaches on the United States side of the
         lake were posted unsafe because  of high bacterial  contamination  (FWPCA
          I968b). Another 12 beaches were deemed as questionable because of  moderate
         bacterial  pollution and 27  were considered generally  safe  with only slight
         pollution.   In  1967,  only 3  beaches  were  found to  be   uncontaminated
         throughout the swimming season.  By contrast,  in 1981, only  4  beaches were
         closed throughout the year, 8 were  open for restricted use and 76 were open as
         safe, uncontaminated beaches.

     Continuing and emerging problems.  The only major open water quality  objective
for which compliance has not been met is dissolved oxygen of the hypolimnion  in central
Lake Erie.  The  Water Quality Agreement calls for year-round aerobic conditions.  The
attempt  to control  anoxia in Lake Erie has  been  through  the implementation of
secondary and tertiary treatment at United States municipal sewage plants, phosphorus
removal to 1.0 mg/l at sewage  treatment plants larger than I mgd in  the Lake Erie basin,
limitations on  phosphorus in detergents,  and control of  diffuse source inputs. The target
load for these phosphorus controls is  11,000  mt/yr as  determined by the  mathematical
models of DiToro and Connolly (1980).
                                      -114-

-------
      The 1978 Water Quality  Agreement requires the development of new phosphorus
target loads and the allocation of these loads between Canada and the United States.  As
part of this negotiation process, base phosphorus loadings ("base loads") were developed
for the lower Great Lakes.  The base load for Lake Erie, which is an estimate of the
expected phosphorus  load to the lake  if the phosphorus concentrations in all municipal
wastewater discharges were at  1.0 mg/i and if average conditions existed for land runoff,
atmospheric,  and  upstream inputs,  is established at 12,856 mt/yr (International  Joint
Commission  1981).   The  Lake  Erie Wastewater  Management Study (Yaksich  1982),
however, recommends that a new base-year load of 16,455 mt/yr be accepted based on
1978-1980 tributary loading data (see Land Use  Activities section).

      In  the  nearshore regions of Lake  Erie, several  areas were found not to be in
compliance  with  Water Quality  Agreement objectives.  Table 18 provides a  list of
violations for specific areas of concern.  The following general problem regions have ben
identified:

      1.   Ohio and Michigan nearshore regions of western Lake Erie, particularly in the
          vicinity  of  major harbors, had persistent violations  of  DO, ammonia,  fecal
          coliforms, total phosphorus, and several trace metals.

      2.   Ohio and Pennsylvania nearshore regions of central Lake Erie, particularly at
          the major river  mouths, have  persistent  violations  of conductivity  and the
          three trace metals, cadmium, copper, and zinc.

      3.   Pennsylvania and New  York nearshore regions  of  eastern  Lake  Erie  were
          relatively free  of  violations except  for  Erie  Harbor where fecal coiiform
          numbers were high in late summer.

      4.   Ontario  nearshore regions throughout the lake were  generally in  compliance
          with only minor violations at tributaries and ports.

      Emerging problems are difficult to assess, particularly with lack of comprehensive
data on the nature of  toxic organic compounds  in the water, sediment and biota of Lake
Erie.   Problems  associated with toxic compounds  are most  likely to emerge in the
                                       -115-

-------
                        TABLE  18

VIOLATIONS OF LAKE ERIE WATER QUALITY OBJECTIVES
         LOCATION

Western Basin Nearshore

1.   Pointe Mouillee to
     Stony Point, Michigan
2.   River Raisin Mouth/
     Monroe, Michigan

3.   Maumee River Mouth/Maumee
     Bay, Michigan and Ohio
4.   Toussaint River Mouth/
     Locust Point, Ohio

5.   Portage River Mouth/
     Port Clinton, Ohio

6.   Sandusky River Mouth/
     Sandusky Bay, Ohio

7.   Bar Point to Leamington, Ohio
             INFREQUENT VIOLATIONS
            ammonia, cadmium
            copper, zinc, mercury
            DO, copper, zinc,
            mercury

            cadmium, copper, zinc,
            mercury
            cadmium, copper, nickel,
            zinc

            pH, conductivity, chromium,
            zinc

            DO, copper, mercury
            pH, total phosphorus
FREQUENT VIOLATIONS
DO, pH, conductivity,
fecal coliforms, iron,
manganese, nickel

pH, conductivity,
iron, nickel

DO, pH, ammonia,
conductivity, total
phosphorus, fecal
coliforms, iron,
magnanese, nickel

conductivity, iron
fecal coliforms, iron,
nickel

pH, conductivity, fecal
coliforms, iron, nickel

-------
                                            TABLE 18 (CONTINUED)
         LOCATION
INFREQUENT VIOLATIONS
FREQUENT VIOLATIONS
Western Basin Main Lake

1.   Entire Basin, U.S.
     Canada

Central Basin Nearshore

1.   Huron River Mouth/
     Huron, Ohio

2.   Black River Mouth/
     Lorain, Ohio
DO, pH, total phosphorus,
zinc
pH, copper, zinc
DO, iron, nickel, zinc,
phenols, ammonia
iron
DO, conductivity, fecal
coliforms, iron, nickel

conductivity, cadmium,
copper
3.   Rocky River Mouth to
     Cuyahoga River Mouth/
     Cleveland, Ohio

4.   Grand River Mouth/
     Fairport, Ohio

5.   Ashtabula River Mouth/
     Ashtabula, Ohio

6.   Conneaut Creek Mouth/
     Conneaut, Ohio

7.   Wheatley to Point Burwell,
     Ontario
DO, conductivity, fecal
coliforms, phenols,
ammonia

conductivity, iron, nickel
DO, conductivity, iron
DO, conductivity, cadmium
copper, nickel, zinc

DO, pH, total phosphorus,
ammonia, phenols, fecal
coliforms
cadmium, copper, iron,
nickel, zinc
cadmium, copper, zinc
cadmium, copper, zinc

-------
                                                TABLE  18 (CONTINUED)
             LOCATION
                                        INFREQUENT VIOLATIONS
                                   FREQUENT VIOLATIONS
CO
I
    Central Basin Main Lake

    1.   Entire Basin, U.S. and Canada

    Eastern Basin Nearshore

    1.   Presque Isle Bay/
         Erie, Pennsylvania
2.   Barcelona to Buffalo,
     New York

3.   Long Point Bay to
     Fort Erie, Ontario

Eastern Basin Main Lake
                                        pH,  total phosphorus, zinc
DO, conductivity, fecal
coliforms, cadmium,
copper, nickel, zinc

DO, conductivity, cadmium,
copper, nickel

pH, conductivity, total
phosphorus, cadmium, silver
                                   DO,  iron
                                                                               iron,  zinc
    1.   Entire Basin, U.S. and Canada
                                        pH,  total  phosphorus,  zinc
                                   iron

-------
nearshore  waters,  especially  harbors  such as  Monroe,  Toledo,  Lorain,  Cleveland,
Ashtabula, Erie, and Buffalo, where preliminary indications have been observed.

     Another problem of a totally different nature may also present itself by the end of
the decade.  Lake  Erie sport fish production is  at  an all-time  high.  This production,
primarily  in the western basin and along the south shore of  the central basin, is nurtured
by high nutrient concentrations  and associated  primary/secondary  productivity.    As
phosphorus controls become more and more effective in limiting algal production, which
is needed to reduce the anoxic region of the central basin hypolimnion, the food for such
important fish species as walleye (Stizostedion vitreum vitreum)  and yellow perch (Perca
flavescens) may be  eroded.  As the 1980s proceed, it will become increasingly important
to consider  the balance  between  western  basin  fish  production  and  central  basin
hypolimnion oxygen content.
                                       -119-

-------
                               RECOMMENDATIONS
      During the 1970s Lake Erie reached stable conditions and in the early 1980s it has
shown signs of improvement:  nutrient loadings are declining, phosphorus concentrations
in the lake are dropping, some sources of contamination by toxic substances are being
checked, levels of contaminants in lake sediments and biota are subsiding, "clean water"
forms of plankton and benthos are showing modest signs of recovery, and fish populations
are rebounding.  However, cause and effect relationships of all of these changes are not
obvious, most of  the  improvements  have been  small, and  for  many parameters,
conclusive trends have yet to be established.  Nonetheless, evidence for improvement is
beginning to mount and it is becoming obvious  to  scientists, fishermen  and  shoreline
dwellers alike that Lake  Erie is recovering.   The extent of future improvements will
depend on continuing efforts to control loading of nutrients and toxic substances to the
lake,   particularly  those   associated   with   industrial and  agricultural  practices.
Surveillance of Lake Erie water, biota, and sediment conditions must continue if we are
to establish clear relationships between remedial actions  and lake quality.

      The 1978-1979 Lake Erie Intensive Study has provided  the most comprehensive set
of  data available  for Lake  Erie.   However,  many  questions  remain unanswered,
particularly in reference to the loading of toxic substances to the lake and its ecological
impact.  Many cause and effect relationships in the lake are poorly understood as are
effects  of  specific remedial actions.   To improve our  understanding  of this  complex
system  and to eventually improve  the quality of Lake  Erie  the following surveillance
activities, remedial actions, evaluations, and special studies are recommended:

Surveillance
      1.   A comprehensive surveillance for Lake Erie should be conducted on an annual
          basis and should contain the following components: a) main lake, b) nearshore
          areas of concern, c) water intakes,  d) tributaries and connecting channels, e)
          point sources, f) atmospheric deposition, g) beaches,  and h) bio-monitoring.
                                       -120-

-------
2.  Main lake surveillance  should  be conducted in  spring, summer  and fail to
    determine a) the seasonal  concentration and quantity of nutrients in each
    basin, b) the oxygen depletion rate and area of anoxia in the central basin, and
    c) seasonal bio mass, including Cladophora.

3.  Nearshore areas of concern should be stressed in an annual monitoring program
    owing to the fact that these areas are the most highly impacted (or potentially
    impacted) areas within the lake, particularly in terms of toxic substances.

4.  Water intake monitoring should be integrated into the nearshore surveillance
    effort at areas of concern.

5.  Because of  the increasing importance of diffuse source loading to Lake Erie,
    surveillance of major tributaries and connecting channels should be  expanded
    to include both periodic and event sampling (i.e. Detroit, Raisin, Maumee,
     Sandusky,  Black,  Rocky,  Cuyahoga,  Grand of  Ohio, Ashtabuia,  Buffalo,
     Grand of Ontario and Niagara rivers).

 6.  Point  sources,   particularly   wastewater  treatment  plants,  should  be
     monitored  routinely to ascertain compliance with Water Quality Agreement
     objectives.

 7.  Atmospheric deposition (wet and dry) monitoring should be continued within
     the Lake Erie drainage basin.

 8.  Because of the obvious public  health  hazards, Lake Erie bathing  beaches
     should be  monitored for bacterial contamination throughout  the  summer
     season.

 9.  Bio-monitoring programs should be expanded to detect  a  wider array of
     toxic substances in Lake Erie biota (e.g. young-of-the-year  spottail shiners
     and Cladophora).
                                  -121-

-------
      10.  Future intensive studies should  not  be  necessary if a  flexible  annual
          surveillance plan is adopted which is reviewed and modified each  year  to
          address continuing and emerging problems.

Remedial Actions
      I.   The agricultural  community should be  encouraged to adopt  conservation
          tillage or no-tillage practices  on all  suitable soils within  the Lake  Erie
          drainage basin.

      2.   As specified in  the Water  Quality Agreement of 1978,  actions  should  be
          taken to  ensure  that all municipal wastewater treatment plants within the
          Lake Erie drainage basin which discharge in excess of I  mgd are operated so
          that  total  phosphorus concentrations  in their effluents  do not  exceed  a
          maximum concentration of  1.0 mg/l.

      3.   States not  presently  limiting  the amount  of   phosphorus in  household
          detergents should enact  legislation which permits no more than 0.5% P.

      4.   Special efforts should be undertaken to identify and control sources of toxic
          substances, including in situ toxicant sources from  sediments.

      5.   Education programs should  be developed  for specific land use activities (i.e.
          agri-business, urban development, industry, recreation) to foster  pollution
          control.

      6.   If the U.S. Army Corps of  Engineers calculations  for base load are  correct,
          then there needs to be an intensified effort to identify cost effective means
          of reducing phosphorus loads, beyond the  present goals.

Evaluation
      I.   Future evaluations of water quality violations should be related to impaired
          use of the lake (e.g. beaches, water supply,  fishery)
                                     -122-

-------
     2.   The Lake Erie surveillance plan should be reviewed and evaluated annually
          to ascertain if  it  is  providing  the necessary  information  for designing
          effective management actions.

     3.   Before new surveillance plans  are developed,  a careful evaluation of past
          data and statistical  techniques  should  be undertaken to  more clearly
          understand apparent trends, or lack thereof, in lake conditions and biota.

     4.   Once new surveillance programs are implemented they should be reviewed
          annually to determine their effectiveness in evaluating remedial programs.

Special Studies
     1.   Studies should be continued to determine the ecological impact to Lake Erie
          of herbicide and  insecticide runoff from conservation tillage cropland.

     2.   Studies should be continued to determine the relative availability  of the
          various forms of  phosphorus for biological productivity.

     3.   Studies should be initiated to determine the role of hypolimnetic  phosphorus
          regeneration and wave resuspension as a mechanism for internal loading.

     In order for any of these recommendations to be fully effective, it is important
that an international body (i.e. International Joint Commission) assume a  leadership
role in planning, organizing, and securing funds to implement those actions which are
deemed necessary to enhance the quality of the Great Lakes.  A greater  degree of
cooperation is required among federal and  state agencies, research institutions and
resource  users to  effect   the  recovery  of  Lake  Erie.   The  International  Joint
Commission has a key role  in fostering such cooperation.
                                      -123-

-------
                                REFERENCES
Beeton, A.M.  1961.  Environmental changes in Lake Erie.  Trans.  Amer. Fish. Soc.
     90(2): 1 53- 1 59.

Beeton, A.M.  1965.  Eutrophication of the St. Lawrence Great Lakes. Limnol. and
     Oceanogr.  IO(2):240-254.

Britt, N.W. (ed.)  1955.  Stratification in western Lake Erie, 1959-1960. Great Lakes
     Fish. Comm. Tech. Rept. 6. 32 p.

Britt, N.W.  1956.  Stratification in  western Lake Erie in summer 1953: effects on the
     Hexagenia (Ephemeroptera) population. Ecology 36(2):239-244.

Britt, N.W., J.T. Addis and R. Engel. 1973.  Limnological studies of  the island area of
     western Lake Erie. Bull. Ohio  Biol. Survey 4(3): 1-89.

Burns, N.M. (ed.)   1976.  Lake Erie in the early seventies. J. Fish Res. Board Can.
Burns, N.M. and C. Ross.  1972.  Project hypo: an intensive study of  the Lake Erie
      central basin hypolimnion and related surface water phenomena.  Canada Centre
      for Inland Waters, Paper No. 6 and USEPA, Tech. Rept. TS-05-7 1 -208-24. 182 p.

Burns, N.M. and F. Rosa.  1981.  Oxygen depletion rates in the hypolimnion of central
      and eastern Lake Erie —  a new approach indicates change.  National Water
      Resources Institute, Canada Centre for Inland Waters.  56 p.

Carr, J.F.  1962.  Dissolved oxygen in Lake Erie, past and present.  Proc. 5th  Conf.
      Great Lakes Res. p. 1-14.

Carr, J.F., V.C. Applegate and M. Keller.   1965.  A recent occurrence of thermal
      stratification and  low dissolved oxygen in western  Lake Erie.   Ohio J. Sci.
      65(6):3l9-327.

                                     -124-

-------
Charlton, M.N.  1979. Hypolimnetic oxygen depletion in central Lake Erie:  has there
     been any change?  Scientific Series No. 110. National Water Research Institute,
     Canada Centre for Inland Waters. 24 p.

DiToro, D.M. and J.P. Connolly.  1980. Mathematical models of water quality in large
     lakes, Part 2: Lake Erie.  USEPA, Environmental  Research Laboratory-Duluth,
     EPA-600/3-80-065.

Dobson, H.H. and M. Gilbertson.   1971.  Oxygen depletion in the hypolimnion of the
     central  basin of Lake Erie. Proc. 14th Conf. Great Lakes Res., Internet. Assoc.
     Great Lakes Res. 1971: 743-748.

Drynan, W.R.  1982. Pollution inputs to the Great Lakes.  Oceans  '82 Conference
     Proceedings, Washington D.C. September 22, 1982. p. 1168-1172.

El-Shaarawi, A.H.  I983a.  A statistical model for dissolved oxygen in the central basin
     of Lake Erie.  jn Statistical assessment of the Great Lakes surveillance program
     1966 to 1981  — Lake Erie.   Environment Canada,  National  Water Resources
     Institute Draft Rept., Chapter 4, p. 191-219.

El-Shaarawi,  A.H.   I983b. Temporal changes in Lake Erie, jri Statistical assessment
     of the Great Lakes surveillance program  1966 to 1981  — Lake Erie.  Environment
     Canada, National Water Resources Institute draft rept. Chapter 2, p. 40-151.

Federal Water Pollution Control Administration.  I968a.   Lake Erie environmental
     summary: 1963-1964. U.S. Dept. Interior, FWPCA.  107 p.

Federal Water Pollution  Control Administration.  I968b.  Lake Erie report: a plan for
     water pollution control. FWPCA, Great Lakes Region. 107 p.

Fish, C.J. and Associates.   I960.   Limnological  survey  of  eastern and central Lake
     Erie, 1928-1929. U.S. Fish and Wildl. Serv., Spec. Sci. Rept. -Fisheries No. 334.
     198 p.
                                     -125-

-------
Frozer, A.S.  and K.E. Willson.   1981.  Loading  estimates  to Lake Erie 1967-1976.
     National Water Research Institute, CCIW, Sci. Ser. 120. 23 p.

Hartley, R.P. and C.P. Potos.  1971.  Algal-temperature-nutritional relationships and
     distribution in Lake Erie 1968. U.S. Environ. Protection Agency. 87 p.

Herdendorf, C.E.  1970.  Lake Erie physicallimnology cruise, midsummer  1967.  Ohio
     Div. Geol. Survey Rept. Invest. 79. 77 p.

Herdendorf, C.E. (ed.)  1980. Lake Erie nutrient control program:  an assessment of its
     effectiveness  in  controlling lake eutrophication.   U.S. Environ.  Protection
     Agency Pub. No. EPA-600/3-80-062.  354 p.

Herdendorf, C.E. 1982.  Large lakes of the world. J. Great Lakes Research 8(3):379-
     412.

International Joint  Commission.  1979. Inventory of major municipal  and industrial
     point source dischargers. IJC, Water  Quality Board, Windsor, Ontario.

International Joint  Commission.  1981.  1981  report on Great Lakes Water Quality,
     Appendix, Great 4_akes Surveillance.  IJC, Water Quality Board. 74 p.

Kasprzyk, R.  1983.  A study of the trends of total phosphorus and chlorophyll a in
     Lake Erie, 1974-1980.  Computer Science Corp., Draft rept.  to  International
     Joint Comm. Surveillance Work Group.  40 p.

Munawar, M.  1981.  Response of nannoplankton and  net plankton  species to changing
     water quality conditions.   Department of Fish,  and Oceans, CCIW, Research
     Report.  20 p.

Munawar, M. and I.F. Munawar.  1976. A lakewide study of phytoplankton biomass and
     its species composition in Lake Erie, April-December  1970. J. Fish. Res. Bd.
     Can. 33:581-600.
                                     -126-

-------
Ohio Division of Wildlife.   1983.  Status of Ohio's Lake Erie fisheries.  Ohio Dept.
     Natural Resources, Div. Wildlife, Lake Erie Fisheries Unit, Sandusky, Ohio. 21  p.

Ontario Ministry of  Environment.   1981.   An assessment of bottom  fauna and
     sediments of the western  basin of Lake Erie,  1979.   OME, Water Resource
     Assessment Unit and Great Lakes Survey Units. 8 p.

Sievering, H.  1982.  Atmospheric  loading of aerosol trace elements and nutrients  to
     Lake Erie.   Executive Summary, Report  to  USEPA, Great  Lakes  National
     Program Office. 4 p.

Thomas, N.A.  1963.  Oxygen deficit rates  for the central basin of Lake Erie.  U.S.
     Public Health Serv., Robert A. Taft Sanitary Engineering Center, Cincinnati.  8
     P-

Thomas, N.A.  1975.   Physical-chemical requirements.  ]n Cladophora in the Great
     Lakes.  Shear, H. and D.E. Konasewich (ed.).  International Joint Commission,
     Windsor, Ontario, p. 73-91.

Thomas, R.L. and J.-M.  Jaquet.   1976.  Mercury in  the surficial sediments of Lake
     Erie. J. Fish. Res. Board Canada 33(3):404-4I2.

Walter, C.J.,  T.L.  Kovack and C.E.  Herdendorf.    1974.  Mercury  occurrence  in
     sediment cores from western  Lake Erie. Ohio J. Sci. 74(1): I-19.

Wilson, J. and L.J.  Walter.  1978.  Sediment-water-biomass  interactions  of toxic
     metals in  the western basin, Lake Erie. Ohio State University, Center  for Lake
     Erie Area Research Technical Rept. 96. 113 p.

Winklhofer, A.R.  (ed.).   1978.  Lake Erie surveillance plan. Prepared by Lake  Erie
     Work Group for the Surveillance Subcommittee,  Implementation Committee,
     Great Lakes  Water  Quality Board of  the International  Joint  Commission,
     Windsor, Ontario. 182 p.
                                     -127-

-------
Yaksich, S.M.  1982.   Lake Erie wastewater management study-final  report.   U.S.
     Army Corps of Engineers, Buffalo District. 223 p.

Zapotsky, J.E.   I960.  Transparency, conductivity, and temperature surveys  in the
     central and western basins of Lake Erie.  U.S. Environ. Protection Agency. Pub.
     No.  EPA-600/3-80-062. p.  103-117.

Zapotsky, J.E. and C.E. Herdendorf.  1980. Oxygen depletion and anoxia in the central
     and western basins of Lake Erie, 1973-1975.  U.S. Environ. Protection Agency.
     Pub. No. EPA-600/3-80-062.  p. 71-102.

Zapotsky, J.E. and W.S. White.  1980.  A reconnaissance  survey for lightweight and
     carbon tetrachloride extractable hydrocarbons in the central and eastern basins
     of Lake Erie:  September 1978.  Argonne National Laboratory.  ANL/ES-87. ISO
     P-
                                    -128-

-------
                     APPENDIX A
          LAKE ERIE INTENSIVE STUDY REPORTS
PREPARED BY THE LAKE ERIE TECHNICAL ASSESSMENT TEAM
TAT
Cont.
No.
1.
2.
3.
<*.
5.

6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
CLEAR
Tech.
Rept.
No.
226
227
228
229
230

231
232
233
234
235
236
237
Report Title
Introduction, Methods and Summary
Data Compatability Analysis
Main Lake Water Quality
Nearshore Water Quality
Nearshore Nutrient Distribution -
Detroit River to Huron, Ohio
Trace Metals in Main Lake and
Nearshore Waters
Microbiology in Main Lake and
Nearshore Waters
Main Lake and Nearshore Water
Quality Problem Areas
Water Quality Violations -
Detroit River to Huron, Ohio
Synoptic Mapping of Water Quality -
Western Basin
Water Quality Index Evaluation
Cluster Analysis of Nearshore
Principal
Author(s)
C.E. Herdendorf
P. Richards
D. Rathke
L. Fay
L. Fay
D. Rathke

3. Letterhos
C.L. Cooper
S. Hessler
C.L. Cooper
C. Kimerline
C.L. Cooper
A. Rush
W. Snyder
C.E. Herdendorf
L. Fay
Y. Hamdy
C.E. Herdendorf
3.3. Mizera
C.E. Herdendorf
C.E. Herdendorf
        Water Masses
3.3. Mizera
                       -129-

-------
                   APPENDIX A CONT.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
260
261
       Nearshore Phytoplankton - Detroit
       River to Huron, Ohio

       Cladophora Surveillance Program -
       Western Basin

       Fisheries Status and Response
       to Water Quality

       Toxic Organic Contaminants in Fish
       Nearshore Benthic Macroinvertebrates
       Detroit River to Huron, Ohio

       Macroinvertebrates in Main Lake
       and Nearshore Sediments

       Annotated Bibliography of Lake Erie
       Benthic Macroinvertebrates

       Main Lake Sediment Chemistry
       Sediment Oxygen Demand
247    Historical Water Quality Trends
       Cleveland, Ohio

248    Nearshore Water Quality Trends
249    Main Lake Water Quality Trends
       Nutrient Loading to Lake Erie and
       Its Effect on Lake Biota

       Lake Erie Intensive Study 1978-
       1979 — Final Report

       Lake Erie Intensive Study 1978-
       1979 ~ Management Report
D.Z. Fisher
D. Rathke

R. Lorenz
C.E. Herdendorf
M.D. Barnes

B. Burby
M.D. Barnes
C.E. Herdendorf
G. Keeler

P.E. Steane
C.L. Cooper
G. Keeler

N. Carlson
3.3. Mizera

W. Davis
L. Fay
C.E. Herdendorf
P. Richards

A. Rush
C.L. Cooper

C.E. Herdendorf
L. Fay

K-P Chen
R. Sykes

D. Rathke et ai.
C.E. Herdendorf
                         -130-

-------
                      APPENDIX B

LAKE ERIE INTENSIVE STUDY REPORTS CONTRIBUTED TO
     THE LAKE ERIE TECHNICAL ASSESSMENT TEAM
                                   Haffner,
                                   IJC- Windsor     June 1980
A.   Tributary Component                  Contributor       Date

1.   Monthly monitoring data (computer
     print-out) for Clinton, Rouge,
     Ecorse, Huron, Raisin Rivers,           Vitelhic,
     1978-1979                            MDNR          June 1981

2.   Monthly monitoring data of Erie
     County, Pa. tributaries: Walnut,        Wellington,
     Elk, Sixteen-mile (tabular data)         ECDH          Dec. 1980

3.   Summary of phosphorus loading
     data for 1978 collected by DC
     Regional Office (computer
     print-out)

4.   Toledo Area River and Stream
     Water Quality Data Report,            Russell,
     1968-1974 (March, 1976)               TPCA          July 1980

5.   Water quality data collected by
     the Toledo Pollution Control
     Agency at the C&O docks at the
     mouth of the Maumee River,            Russell,
     1975-1981 (bench sheets)               TPCA          Feb. 1981

6.   Estimation of tributary total
     phosphorus load into Lake Erie,
     evaluation of  applicable models

7.   Periodic tributary monitoring data
     (computer print-out) of Lake Erie
     tributary surveillance conducted
     by the New York State Dept. of         Maylath,
     Environmental Conservation            NYDEC         Dec. 1980

8.   Summary of total phosphorus
     loadings for the  water years
     1970 to 1977 for Canadian streams      Terry,
     draining into Lake Erie                 MOE            Feb. 1981
                                  Kuo-pin Chen,
                                  OSU-TAT       Dec. 1980
                        -131-

-------
9.    Total phosphorus loadings for the
     water years 1978 and 1979 for the
     Canadian streams draining into
     Lake Erie

10.  On Phosphorus and its avail-
     ability in total loading into
     Lake Erie, 1970-1980
                                          Terry,
                                          MOE
Jan. 1981
                                          Kuo-pin Chen,
                                          OSU-TAT        May 1981
B.   Point Source Component
1.    Summary of the phosphorus loading
     data collected by the IJC Regional
     Office for 1978
                                          Haffner,
                                          IJC-Windsor     June 1980
C.   Atmospheric Component
1.   Preliminary outline draft: final
     report for 1979-1980: An experi-        Sievering,       Sept. 1982
     mental study of Lake Loading by        et al.
     Air Pollution Transport and Dry        Governors
     Deposition                           State Univ.

2.   Summary of Great Lakes weather
     and ice conditions, winter
     1978-1979. Tech. Mem. ERL           NOAA,
     GLERL-31                           GLERL         Aug. 1980
D.    Connecting Channels Component


1.    Water Year  1980-Detroit River
      (6 page  rept.)

2.    Water quality assessment of the
      Thames River mouth, Lake St.
      Clair, 1975.

3.    Great Lakes water quality data
      summary, Detroit River 1976

14.    Great Lakes water quality data
      summary, St. Clair River 1976
                                          MDNR
June 1981
                                          Hamdy, Kinkead,
                                          Griffiths,
                                          MOE            June 1980
                                          MOE
                                          MOE
June 1980
 June 1980
                                 -132-

-------
5.    St. Clair River organics study,
     waste dispersion

6.    St. Clair River organics study.
     The detection of mutagenic
     activity; screening of twenty-
     three compounds of industrial
     origin

7.    St. Clair River organics study.
     Biological surveys 1968 and
     1977
Hamdy and
Kinkead, MOE   June 1980
Rokosh and
Lovasz, MOE
MOE
June 1980
June 1980
     Nearshore Intensive Surveillance Component
1.   Investigation of water quality
     in the Leamington area of
     western lake Erie, 1973-1976

2.   Recent changes in the phyto-
     plankton of Lakes Erie and
     Ontario

3.   Phytoplankton studies in the
     Nanticoke area of Lake Erie,
     1969-1978

*.   Water movements in the Nanticoke
     region of Lake Erie, 1976.
     Ibid., 1978

5.   Nanticoke Water Chemistry 1975,
     Ibid. 1976

6.   Nanticoke Aquatic Environment,
     1967-197
-------
10.   Biological status in nearshore
     zone of the south shore of Lake
     Erie between Vermilion and
     Ashtabula, Ohio: Preliminary
     Report

11.   Water quality and some aspects of
     chemical limnology in the near-
     shore zone of the south shore of
     Lake Erie between Vermilion and
     Ashtabula, Ohio: preliminary
     report

12.   Limnological surveillance of the
     nearshore zone of Lake Erie in
     central and eastern Ohio.  Pre-
     liminary report. Part I:
     Chemical Limnology

13.   Chemical limnology in the near-
     shore zone of Lake Erie between
     Vermilion, Ohio and Ashtabula,
     Ohio, 1978-1979:  Data Summary and
     Preliminary Interpretations and
     Appendices

14.   Historical trends  in water
     chemistry in the U.S. Nearshore
     Zone, central basin, Lake  Erie

15.   Data Compatability Analyses -
     Lake Erie International
     Surveillance Plan

16.   Environmental  status of the
     southern nearshore zone of the
     central basin of Lake Erie in
     1978 and 1979 as  indicated by the
     benthic macroinvertebrates

17.   The crustacean zooplankton of the
     southern nearshore zone of the
     central basin of Lake Erie in 1978
     and 1979: Indications of trophic
     status

18.   Composition and abundance  of
     phytoplankton of  the central
     basin of Lake Erie during  1978-
     1979. Lake Erie Nearshore study
Krieger et al.
Heidelberg
College
Richards,
Heidelberg
College
Richards,
Heidelberg
College
Feb. 1979
Feb. 1979
Jan. 1980
Richards,
Heidelberg
College

Richards,
Heidelberg
College-TAT

Richards,
Heidelberg
College-TAT
Krieger,
Heidelberg
College
Krieger,
Heidelberg
College
Kline,
Heidelberg
College
Feb.1981
Nov. 1981
Nov. 1981
June 1981
June 1981
Oct. 1981
                                 -134-

-------
 19.  Bacterial water quality of the
     southern nearshore zone of Lake
     Erie in 1978 and 1979

20.  A preliminary summary of the
     1978 nearshore monitoring program
     for eastern Lake Erie

21.  Lake Erie nearshore monitoring
     program, Conneaut, Ohio to
     Buffalo, New York, Part I, 1978

22.  Cruise means data for 1978 and
     1979 nearshore monitoring program
     for eastern Lake Erie (computer
     print-out)

23.  Western Lake Erie nearshore
     intensive study 1978-1979:
     Microbiology

24.  Western Lake Erie nearshore
     intensive study 1978-1979:
     Nearshore water quality problem
     areas
Stanford,
Heidelberg
College        Sept. 1981
SUNY-Buffalo  March 1979
SUNY-Buffalo  April 1981
SUNY-Buffalo  Nov. 1981
Diamond et at.
OSU-CLEAR
Herdendorf
and Fay,
OSU-CLEAR
Dec. I960


Dec. 1980
     Water Intake Component
     Water intake monitoring data
     collected during 1978-1979 by
     the Erie County (Pa.) Dept.
     of Health (WQN Sta. 601)
Wellington,
ECDH          Dec. 1980
G.   Beach Monitoring Component
     Comprehensive summer beach sur-
     veillance data collected by the
     Erie County (Pa.) Dept. of Health
Wellington,
ECDH          Dec. I960
2.   Lake Erie beach monitoring
     reports 1978-81
Witt,
USEPA/GLNPO Sept. 1982
                               -135-

-------
H.   Clodophora Component
 I.   Cladopohora monitoring - central
     and eastern basins

 I.    Main Lake Component
Millner et al.
SUNY-Buffalo   Dec. 1979
 I.   Workshop on the analysis and
     reporting of Erie 79 and Erie
     80 experiments (Stage I)

2.   Report on summer phosphorus
     and oxygen for Lake Erie -
     1970, 1977 and 1978

3.   Lake Erie water chemistry and
     sediment data  1978-1979

4.   Lake Erie dissolved substances
     report 1967-1980

5.   Lake Erie phytoplankton report
     1978-1979, preliminary results
Boyce,
CCIW
Rosa,
CCIW
Nov. 1980
April 1979
Rockwell,
USEPA/GLNPO Dec. 1980

Rockwell,
USEPA/GLNPO April  1982

DeVault,
USEPA/GLNPO May 1982
J.   Fish Contaminants Component
I.    Organic chemical residues in
     Region V watersheds (data rept.)
2.   Organochlorine contaminant
     concentrations and uptake rates
     in fishes in Lake Erie tributary
     mouths (abst. and data summary)

3.   Laboratory report. Residues of
     polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins
     and dibenzofuransin Great Lakes
     fish

4.   Trends in the mercury content of
     western Lake Erie fish and
     sediment,  1970-1977
Veith and
Kuehl, USEPA/
DuluthERL     June 1980
Herdendorf,
Barnes, Burby,
QSU-TAT       Dec. 1980
Stall ings,
et al.,
USF & WS

Kinkead
and Hamdy,
OMOE
July 1981
June 1980
                                -136-

-------
K.   Wildlife Contaminants Component


No reports to TAT


L.   Rodioactivity Component
     1977-1979 environmental radio-
     logical monitoring for the Davis-
     Besse Nuclear Power Station at        Toledo
     Locust Point and Lake Erie            Edison Co.      Aug. 1980
                               -137-

-------
                                 APPENDIX C

    REPORTS RECEIVED BY THE LAKE ERIE TECHNICAL ASSESSMENT TEAM
          AS SOURCE DOCUMENTS FOR THE MANAGEMENT REPORT
                      THE LAKE ERIE INTENSIVE STUDY
Armstrong, D.E.  1978. Availability of pollutants associated with suspended or settled
     river sediments which gain access to the Great  Lakes.  USEPA  Res.  Contract
     No. 68-01-4479, Univ. of Wisc.-Madison, Water Chemistry Program. 20 p.

Barton, D.R.  1981.  A survey of benthic macroinvertebrates near the mouth of the
     Grand River, Ontario, 1981, Contract P.O.  No. A 71587, Ontario Ministry of the
     Environment, Water Resources Branch, Toronto.  24 p.

Boyce, P.M.  1980.  Erie,  1980 physical experiments in the central basin proposal and
     experiment plan.  National Water Research Institute, Canada Centre for Inland
     Waters, Burlington, Ontario.  51 p.

Boyce, P.M.  1980.  Workshop on the analysis and reporting of Erie  79  and Erie 80
     experiments  (Stage  1).  Workshop  memorandum,  NWRI,  CCIW, Burlington,
     Ontario. 4 p.

Charlton, M.N.  1979. Hypolimnetic oxygen depletion  in central Lake  Erie:  has there
     been any change? Scientific Series No. 110.  National Water Research Institute,
     Canada Centre for Inland Waters.  24 p.

Charlton, M.N.  1981.  Support material for workshop on Lake Erie oxygen  depletion.
     National Water  Research Institute, Canada  Centre for Inland Waters, Burlington,
     Ontario. 32  p.

Chen, K.   1982.  The optimal total phosphorus loading into Lake Erie.  Ohio State
     University, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Columbus, Ohio. 40 p.

Click, D.E. and 3.E.  Biesecker.  1979.  Water  resources data for Ohio, vol.   2, St.
     Lawrence  River basin,  USGS water data report OH-78-2,  water year  1978.
     Water Resources Division, U.S. Geological Survey, Columbus, Ohio. 202 p.

Cooper, C.L. 1978.  Lake Erie nearshore water quality data, 1928-1978. Ohio State
     University, Center for  Lake  Erie Area Research Tech. Rept. No. 80, Columbus,
     Ohio. 207 p.

Cooper, C.L.  1979.  Water  quality of the nearshore  zone of Lake Erie: a historical
     analysis and  delineation of nearshore characteristics of the United States waters.
     Ohio State University, Center for Lake Erie Area Research, Columbus, Ohio.
    " 170 p.

Culver, D.A.  1978.  Zooplankton, phytoplankton, and bacteria as indicators of  water
     quality in the nearshore zone of Lake Erie: a prospectus. Ohio State University,
     Center for Lake Erie Area Reearch Tech. Rept. No. 112, Columbus, Ohio.  15 p.
                                      -138-

-------
Cummings, T.R. and J.E. Biesecker.  1979.  Water resources data for Michigan, USGS
     water-data report Ml-78-1,  water year 1978.   Water Resources Division, U.S.
     Geological Survey, Lansing, Michigan.  45! p.

Data  Interpretation  and Management Work Group.   1979.  Data management  and
     interpretation  component of  the Lake  Erie international  surveillance plan.
     Prepared for the Surveillance Subcommittee, Great Lakes Water Quality Board,
     IJC, for use by the Lake Erie Work Group. 27 p.

Davis,  D.E.  1982.  An analysis of previous  pesticide concentrations and transport in
     the Maumee River and  its tributaries. Ohio State University, Center for Lake
     Erie Area Research, Columbus, Ohio. 36 p.

DeVault, D.S.  1982. Preliminary results of  the 1978-1979 Lake Erie intensive study —
     phytoplankton. USEPA, Great Lakes National Program Office,  Chicago, Illinois.
     64 p.

DeWitt, B.H. et al.  1980. Summary of Great Lakes weather and ice conditions winter
     1978-79. NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL GLERL-31.  123 p.

Erie County Health  Dept.   1980.  Erie County,  Pennsylvania Lake  Erie basin water
     quality, annual report,  1978-79. Division of Water Quality and  Land Protection,
     Erie County Health Dept., Erie, Pa.  61 p.

ETA Committee, Science Advisory Board. I960. Biological availability of phosphorus.
     Draft report of the Expert Committee on Engineering and Technological Aspects
     of Great Lakes Water Quality to the Great Lakes Science Advisory Board, IJC.
     27 p.

Fay, L.A.  1981. Lake Erie intensive study, 1978-1979: U.S. nearshore, western basin
     final report.  Ohio State University CLEAR Tech. Rept. No.  204,  Columbus,
     Ohio.

Fay, L.A.   1982.  Final  report of  1981  main lake water  quality conditions for Lake
     Erie.  Ohio State University, Center for Lake Erie Area Research Tech.  Rept.
     No. 254-F, Columbus, Ohio.

Ferguson, H.L. and V.V. Adamkus.   1982.   Water quality  board  1982 annual report
     draft.   International  Joint  Commission,  Great Lakes  Water  Quality  Board,
     Ottawa and Washington D.C. 206 p.

Fraser, A.S. and  K.E.  Wilson.  1981.   Loading  estimates  to Lake  Erie,  1967-1976,
     Scientific Series No. 120. National Water Research Institute, Canada Centre for
     Inland  Waters, Burlington, Ontario. 23  p.

Fraser, A.S. and  K.E.  Wilson.  1981.  Loading estimates to Lake Erie  (1967-1976).
     National Water Research Institute, Canada Centre for  Inland Waters, Burlington,
     Ontario.  44 p.

Frederick, V.R.   1981.   Lake Erie nearshore monitoring program  Conneaut, Ohio to
     Buffalo, New York, Part i:  1978.  Great Lakes Laboratory,  State University of
     New York College, Buffalo, New York.  286 p.
                                    -139-

-------
Frederick, V.R., J.J. Kubiak and P.J. Letki.  1979. A preliminary summary of the 1978
     nearshore monitoring program for eastern Lake Erie.  Great Lakes Laboratory,
     State University College, Buffalo, New York. 68 p.

Great Lakes Water Quality Board.  1981.  1981 Report on Great Lakes water quality,
     appendices.  Great Lakes Water Quality Board.  157 p.

Gregor, D.J. and E.D. Ongley.  1978.  Analysis of nearshore water quality data in the
     Canadian Great  Lakes,  1967-1973, Part !.   Dept.  of Geography, Queen's
     University, Kingston, Ontario. 270 p.

Hamdy, Y.S.   1982.  Grand River water  quality report - Draft Final Report.  Great
     Lakes Surveys  Unit,  Water Resources  Branch,  Ontario  Ministry of  the
     Environment, Toronto.  45 p.

Hamdy, Y.S., J.D. Kinkead and M. Griffiths.  1977.  Water quality assessment  of the
     Thames River mouth, Lake St.  Clair, 1975. Water Resources Branch, Ontario
     Ministry of the Environment, Toronto.  30 p.

Hamdy, Y.S.  and  J.D. Kinkead.   1978.   Investigation  of water  quality in  the
     Leamington area of western  Lake Erie,  1973-1976. Great Lakes Surveys Unit,
     Water Resources Branch, Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Toronto. 23 p.

Hamdy, Y. and D.I. Ross.  I960.  An assessment of water quality conditions Wheatley
     Harbour, Lake Erie, 1979.  Great Lakes Surveys Unit, Water Resources Branch,
     Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Toronto. 25 p.

Hartig, J.H.   I960.  Highlights of water quality and pollution control in  Michigan.
     Michigan Dept. of Nat. Res. Publ. No. 4833-9804. 28 p.

Heathcote, I.W.  1979.  Nanticoke water  chemistry, 1978.  Water Resources Branch,
     Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Toronto. 33 p.

Heidtke, T., D.J. Scheflow and W.C. Sonzogni.  1980.  Detergent phosphorus control:
     some Great Lakes perspectives.  Great Lakes Environmental  Planning  Study,
     Contribution No. 23.  21 p.

Herdendorf, C.E.   1978. Lake Erie nearshore surveillance station plan for the United
     States.  Ohio State University, Center for Lake Erie Area Research, Columbus,
     Ohio. 51 p.

Hopkins, G.J. and C. Lea.  1979.  Phytoplankton studies in the Nanticoke area of Lake
     Erie 1969-1978.  Water Resources Branch, Ontario Ministry of the Environment,
     Toronto.  19 p.

King, J.E., J.E. Richards, R. Allerton  and R.H. Wendt.   1982.  Phosphorus removal  in
     Ohio  wastewater  treatment  plants within the Lake  Erie basin.   Manuscript
     prepared for Ohio Journal of Science. 13 p.

Kinkead, J.D. and Y.  Hamdy.   1976.  Report on a bacteriological survey  along the
     Ontario shoreline of  the Detroit River, 1975.  Great Lakes  Survey Unit, Water
     Resources Branch, Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Toronto. 14 p.

                                    -140-

-------
Kinkeod, J.D. and Y. Hamdy.  1978. Trends in the mercury content of western Lake
     Erie fish and sediment, 1970-1977.  Great Lakes Surveys Unit, Water Resources
     Branch, Ontario Ministry of the Environment. Toronto. 19 p.

Kline, P.A.   1981.  Composition and abundance of phytoplankton from the nearshore
     zone of the central  basin of Lake Erie during the 1978-79 Lake Erie nearshore
     study.  Heidelberg College, Water Quality Laboratory, Tiffin, Ohio. 65 p.

Kohli, B.  1978.  Water movements in the Nanticoke region of Lake Erie, 1976.  Water
     Resources Branch, Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Toronto. 29 p.

Kohli, B.  1979.  Nanticoke water movements, 1977. Water Resources Branch, Ontario
     Ministry of the Environment, Toronto.  29 p,

Kohli, B.  1979.  Nanticoke water movements, 1978. Water Resources Branch, Ontario
     Ministry of the Environment, Toronto.  19 p.

Kreiger, K.A. 1980.  Limnological surveillance of the nearshore zone of Lake Erie in
     central and eastern  Ohio, preliminary report part III: zooplankton.  Heidelberg
     College, Water Quality Laboratory, Tiffin, Ohio. 64 p.

Kreiger, K.A. 1981.  The crustacean zooplankton of the southern nearshore zone of
     the central  basin of Lake Erie in 1978 and 1979:  indications of trophic status.
     Heidelberg College, Water Quality Laboratory, Tiffin, Ohio. 41 p.

Kreiger, K.A.  1981.  Environmental  status of  the southern  nearshore zone of  the
     central basin of Lake Erie in  1978  and  1979  as   indicated  by  the benthic
     macroinvertebrates.    Heidelberg College, Water Quality  Laboratory,  Tiffin,
     Ohio.  31 p.

Krieger, K.A. and P.J. Crerar.  1980.  Limnological surveillance of the nearshore zone
     of Lake Erie in central and eastern Ohio, Preliminary Report Part II:  Benthos.
     Heidelberg College, Water Quality Laboratory, Tiffin, Ohio. 66 p.

Kreiger, K., P. Kline and P. Pryfogle.  1979. Preliminary report: biological status in
     the  nearshore zone  of the south shore of Lake  Erie  between Vermilion  and
     Ashtabula,  Ohio.   Heidelberg College, Water Quality Laboratory, Tiffin, Ohio.
     34 p.

Lake Erie Work Group.  1978.  Lake Erie surveillance plan. Prepared for Surveillance
     Subcommittee, Great Lakes Water Quality Board, IJC. 179 p.

Ministry of the Environment.  1977. Great Lakes water quality data summary, Detroit
     River  1976.   Great Lakes Surveys  Unit,  Water Resources Branch,  Ontario
     Ministry of the Environment, Toronto.  57 p.

Myers, G.R.   1982.  Lake Erie beaches. Ohio EPA, Division of  Surveillance and Water
     Quality Standards. Columbus, Ohio.  10 p.

Nicholls, K.H. 1980. Recent changes in the phytoplankton of Lake Erie and Ontario.
     Limnology and Toxicity Section, Ontario Ministry of the  Environment, Rexdale,
     Ontario. 48 p.
                                    -141-

-------
Nicholls, K.H., D.W. Standen, G.J. Hopkins and E.G. Carney.  1977. Declines in the
     nearshore phytoplankton of Lake Erie's western  basin since  1971.  J.  Great
     Lakes Res., Oct. 1977. Internet. Assoc. Great Lakes Res. 3(l-2):72-78.

Ohio Dept. of Natural Resources.  1982.  Status of Ohio's Lake Erie fisheries, March
      1982.  Lake Erie Fisheries Unit Staff, Ohio Dept. of Natural Resources, Division
     of Wildlife, Sandusky, Ohio.  26 p.

Ontario Ministry of the Environment. 1977. Great Lakes water quality data summary,
     St. Clair River,   1976.   Water  Resources  Branch,  Ontario Ministry of  the
     Environment, Toronto. 57 p.

Ontario Ministry of the Environment. 1977. Great Lakes water quality data summary,
     Detroit  River,  1976.   Water Resources  Branch,  Ontario  Ministry  of  the
     Environment, Toronto. 57 p.

Palmer, M.D.  and J. Polak. 1978. The aquatic environment of Long Point Bay in the
     vicinity  of Nanticoke on Lake Erie  1967-1974.   The Nanticoke Environmental
     Committee. 22 p.

Perkins, D.C. and J.E. Biesecker.  1979. Water resources data for Pennsylvania, vol. 3,
     Ohio River and St. Lawrence River basins,  USGS water-data report PA-78-3,
     water  year 1978.  Water Resources Division U.S.  Geological Survey, Harrisburg,
     Pennsylvania.  310 p.

Pliodzinskas,  A.J.   1979.   A general  overview  of Lake  Erie's nearshore  benthic
     macroinvertebrate fauna.  Ohio State University, Center  for Lake Erie Area
     Research Tech. Rept. No. 126, Columbus, Ohio.  83 p.

Polak, J.  1977.  Nanticoke water chemistry, 1975. Water Resources Branch, Ontario
     Ministry of the Environment, Toronto. 41 p.

Polak, J.    1978.  Nanticoke  water chemistry.   Water Resources  Branch,  Ontario
     Ministry of the Environment, Toronto. 58 p.

Proctor and Redfern Ltd.   1981.  A water quality assessment of Lake Erie harbours.
     Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Toronto. 65  p.

Richards, R.P.  1979. Water quality and some aspects of chemical  limnology in the
     nearshore zone of the south shore of Lake Erie between Vermilion and Ashtabula,
     Ohio.  Heidelberg College, Water Quality Laboratory, Tiffin, Ohio. 67 p.

Richards, R.P. I960. Limnological surveillance of the  nearshore zone of Lake Erie in
     central  and  eastern Ohio,  preliminary  report  part I:   chemical  limnology.
     Heidelberg College, Water Quality Laboratory, Tiffin, Ohio. 255 p.

Richards, R.P. 1981.  Chemical limnology in the nearshore zone of Lake Erie between
     Vermilion, Ohio and  Ashtabula, Ohio, 1978-1979:  data summary and preliminary
      interpretations. Heidelberg College Water Quality Laboratory, Tiffin, Ohio. 86
     P-
                                     -142-

-------
Richards, R.P.  1981. Chemical  limnology in the nearshore zone of Lake Erie between
     Vermilion, Ohio  and  Ashtabula,  Ohio,   1978-1979:  appendices.    Heidelberg
     College, Water Quality Laboratory, Tiffin, Ohio.  72 p.

Richards, P.R.  1981. Historical trends in water chemistry  in the U.S. nearshore zone,
     central basin, Lake Erie.  Center for Lake Erie Area Research, Columbus, Ohio
     and Heidelberg College, Water Quality Laboratory, Tiffin, Ohio. 43 p.

Rockwell, D.C.   1982.   Dissolved  substances  in Lake Erie — western, central and
     eastern basins 1967-1980.   USEPA Great  Lakes  National  Program  Office,
     Chicago, Illinois.  11  p.

Rohlich, G.A. and D.J. O'Connor. 1980.  Phosphorus management for the Great Lakes:
     Final Report,  Phosphorus  Management Strategies Task Force.   International
     Joint Commission's Great Lakes Water Quality Board and Great Lakes  Science
     Advisory Board. 129 p.

Rosa, F. and N.M.  Burns.  1981.  Oxygen depletion  rates in the hypolimnion of central
     and eastern Lake Erie  — a new approach indicates change.  Data report  for
     Workshop on  Central  Basin  Oxygen Depletion.   National  Water Research
     Institute, Canada Centre for Inland Waters, Burlington, Ontario. 56 p.

Sievering, H. et al.   1981.   An experimental  study of lake  loading by air pollution
     transport and dry deposition. Draft final report for 1979-1980. Governor's State
     Univ. Environmental  Science Program, Park Forest South, Illinois, 44 p.

Stanford, E.  1981.  Bacterial water quality of the southern nearshore zone of Lake
     Erie in 1978 and 1979. Heidelberg  College, Water  Quality Laboratory, Tiffin,
     Ohio. 89 p.

Suns, K., G.A. Rees and G. Crawford. 1982. Temporal trends and spatial distribution
     of  organochlorine residues in  Lake  Erie spottail shiners (Notropis Hudson!us),
     draft.  Ontario  Ministry of the  Environment, Rexdale, Ontario!  12 p.

Thomas, N.A.  1981.  Ecosystem changes in Lakes Erie and Ontario.  Bull. Buffalo Soc.
     Nat. Sci. 25(4):  1-20.

Walters, L.J. and D. McGuire. 1978.  Concentration of selected metals in Maumee Bay
     and its tributaries. Dept. of Geology, Bowling Green  University, Bowling Green,
     Ohio. 23 p.

Water Quality Laboratory. 1978. Limnological surveillance of the nearshore  zone of
     Lake Erie in central and  eastern Ohio, a proposal of  research.  Submitted to
     GLNP  USEPA,  Region V,  Water Quality Laboratory  Heidelberg College, Tiffin,
     Ohio, 47 p.

Weiler,  R.R. and  I.W. Heathcote.   1979.  Nanticoke water  chemistry,  1969-1978.
     Water Resources Branch, Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Toronto.  43 p.

Westwood,  J.D.   1981.   An  assessment  of the bottom fauna and  sediments  of the
     western basin of Lake Erie, 1979.  Southwestern Region, London, Ontario and
     Great  Lakes  Surveys Unit, Water Resources Branch,  Ontario Ministry  of the
     Environment, Toronto. 24  p.

                                     -143-

-------
Witt,  S.   1982.  Great  Lakes bathing beach report.  USEPA, Great Lakes National
     Program Office, Chicago, Illinois. 6 p.

Yaksich, S.M.  1982.  Lake Erie wastewater management study, final  report.  U.S.
     Army Corps of Engineers, Buffalo District.  105 p.

Zapotosky, J.E. and  W.S. White.  1980.  A reconnaissance survey for lightweight and
     carbon tetrachloride extractable hydrocarbons in the central and eastern basins
     of  Lake Erie:  September  1978.   Division of Environmental  Impact Studies,
     Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois.  150 p.
                                       -144-

-------
                                    TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
                             (Please read Initractions on the reverse before completing)
 1  REPORT NO
   EPA-905/4-84-007
                                                            3 RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION>NO.
 4. TITLE ANDSUBTITLE
   Lake Erie Water Quality 1970-1982:  A Management
   Assessment
                                   5 REPORT DATE
                                    November 1984
                                   6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
 7. AUTHORIS)
   Charles  E.  Herdendorf
   Lake  Erie  Technical Assessment Team
                                                            8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
 9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
  The Ohio  State University
  Center  for  Lake Erie Area Research
  Columbus, Ohio
                                                             10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
                                   11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.

                                     R005516
 12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
  TI.S. Environmental Protection Agencv
  Great Lakes  National Program Office
  536 South  Clark Street, Room 958
  Chicago, Illinois  60605
                                   13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
                                     Final      1970-1982
                                   14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
                                     Great Lakes National  Program
                                     Office-USEPA-Region V
 15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES

  David C. Rockwell
  Prnippt Dffirpr	
 16. ABSTRACT


  This report is  to  highlight the findings and  conclusions of the 1978-1979  Lake
  Erie Intensive  Study by placing them in perspective with earlier investigations
  and subsequent  monitoring data from 1980 to 1982,  where available.  The primary
  purpose of this report  is to provide management  information in the form of a
  review of the lake's status and its trends and in  the form of recommendations
  to ensure continued  improvements in the quality  of its waters and biota.   Lake
  Erie has experienced several decades of accelerated eutrophication and toxic
  substances contamination.   During the latter  part  of the 1960s remedial actions
  were planned and by  the latter part of the 1970s,  many of the plans were at
  least partially implemented.
 7.
                                KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
                  DESCRIPTORS
                                               b. IDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS
                                                 c. COS AT I Field/Group
 Water quality
 Thermocline
 Atmospheric loadings
 Toxic organics
 Phosphorus data
 Nutrients
 Algal productivity
Diatom biomass
Phytoplankton
Biota
 3  DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
 Document  is available to public  through
 the National Information Service(NTIS),
 Springfield,  Virginia 22161
                      19 SECURITY CLASS I rins Report/
                         Unclassified
21 NO. OF PAGES
    152
                     20 SECURITY CLASS .T

                         Unclassified
                                                 22 PRICE
CPA Form 2220-1 (9-73)
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1984 554-814

-------