-------
1,
COHPAUY
KJDLAfiD DIV
r.t 140640
MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT FOR
1HIS li YOUII MUU1IHV III I'OIII f OH'-' I OH
SEE MEVCIISC SIOC fOfl nCTUMU MAIL
Plt-jic c«ini|ilci« jnd luluinl Iwo cuf'd ol llin luim
.1 ila tod (.1 c^ch monlh. Tim u|>oil mull u-ch out
/Jt>,,l IV-
02
OOW CHEMICAL COMPANY
OUTFALL I 031
f'ROC.UASTEG'TO T1TTAOAHASSEE' R. 031
,'JAME
.IIJIIS
1 IMlT
UAf£
S _
6
J
8
S J
10 _
II
12
13 _
I4__
15
16
II
IB
19 _
20_
i " ?'_
73
25_
_76_
_27
28
T2?I
30_
3I~
il GINNI
1 MJI»*U P
56CJ01
FLOH
3
T
•iIOOO.CB.66j LS6
5GP5P
CONDUIT
MOD
1 IOAILY AVG
1 11 {
\ '•' 1
1 )• H
- 1 ./
P"77
i-L-i,
i
. 1 .
h 1 ^
• i
> i -
Ll. 11
\< \ -
],!_,
U -
AVIflAGE
••Ufc'blH U
»Vt lot V
- UA.ll
• II
l
1
L>.
1U
| /
S '"
._! i
.11-
L 1
A t S H 1 1X1
PIES IAI
*..
HIGH
1 _L.I
1 .J 1
HUNG
LOW
LUJ!
_i -_L
-J—l.
ci-ilTJr|7r-
!./r,!, h !J.
BOD-5
i
L
L
»v
MA
IO
0138_J
Liming oll.cc by llw lOihol IlK monlh. "-*.'.
PART 1 - RETURN TO DEHT Of NATURAL RESOURCES
,- • — — i . «"--- "„ . • n *r n "\ n
» .1 Uj*
D* LY AVG
1.5"
3 2
32
9.9
0 **
-^
n
HkVU
lOEf J
At L-'
-VC MO V
1(1.
5
.iG
1 I
l i
»YS HtPO
PU51AK
HIGH
Lrxxii^
1 1 .-L1
i i !
l-J J-
BIING
LOW
J&
iti.'S _l—i— l-
01 I_j a^_L.-i_
UP Puf*CM ft Ml
|IY~~ UN Hiri'lNALlY
o>
i
ii
C
r
c
L
C
C
<;
c
(
AV
IAA
10T
DA
04
CYGEH 0
J_MG/L
DAILY AV(
9s"
'/.j
'ii
5i 5
v3
ao
9.3
/«il
IL c
lie
i'.9
IC3
3.43:
EHAN^TOT
"
l
113
Il7
}7
/v
ct?
r- >
j V(/
KAGE !
IhluM . .
1 1
._l_i_
•UtH DATS D1PO
AL SAMPLES 1AK
^ EXCEEDING Ml
AVG MA 4 VlOU
uu^ fu«
OF LAW THAI
HIGH
1 1 1
1 1 1
1
1 L
AUNG
EN
XIMUM
LOW
_J
J
I/ id
1
J_
1
11-11
CH lit "I
1 HAVE I'l IISON
/ 0 > U 0 ;
SOLIOS-DISS-lflOC-
' MG/L1' '
1
1
1
1
r
i
AV
MA
NUI
id
DA
DAILY AVG
•yfw
i_
-T|
RAGE
KIMUM
1BEH 0
AL SAI.
ti EXCC
1.2 h
77
<
i
i i
ITS REPO
'.PLES IAK
EOING I.W
HIGH
(rrrtip
—
U <
1. ,1
RUNG
EN
LOW
>iM
f
1
'[Oil
1 1
Jcii£
1 1
AVG MA.I VlOi 1 1 1 1 1
OUP PUNCH 1" "1
ALLY EXAMINED AND AM PAM
SOL1DS-SUS-NET
•' HG/L' ' '
AV
3C
i
T
L
1
T
i
!
AVE
MA
NUtl
107
OA
rERACEl 1
• 1*
DAILY AVG
•o.o
_L
RAGE
(IMUM
nBE fl D
AL SAI
S EXCE
V.Y
1
1 1
LYS HtPO
(PUS TAK
1 DING l.\f
1AXII
5 '
HIGH
Cfll^i
l3l
l*/l(
1_J — L
L_1_L
RTING
XIMUK1 /
1UH
LOW
1. 13
01- 1?
_j_L-
\C\f-
'iCil
AVG MAX. V OL | [ j (
DUP PUNCH 1" ••!
IAN WITH lilt INIOHMATION
(UlLAINING III! IUIOMMAIIDN.
SOLID
- •••(_
A\
C
i
1
1
±
AVI
MA
NUI
10
;BAI
ftKA
rfrJO
DAIL
1 \
_Ji
_jlr
v-
RAGE
KIMUM
>BLB 0
AL SAI
S EXCC
Dale lonn wjs
P,ini.d Lei/ Jo/2
.47031 1 00100
S-SU£
BS/P/
G£' jl
L
Y AVG
'•07
r/9
r6- i
7/ 3
> i
ATSHEPO
IPLEilAX
EOlNG MA
>-NET«D
>Y
iAxn
613"
HIGH
1 \H\
l/lf'l
III
1 l
HI INC
EN
XIMUU
7
LOW
n &
f»i/i?
11
I0l0
OUP PUNCH l» "1
SUUMIIfED IN THIS DOCIIMEN
1 ULIIIVC 1IIAI (HI IN! OHM'.
U.f
9
PH
0 TO J«
Yit
9
i
<
c
c_
L.
C.
C.
i
c
AVt
MA
M
IOI
DAI
\f.l nun r
DAILY AVG
7 't
't f
->. if
X.C>
.f.i-
«f 1-
f'.y
.? L,
,rU-
rt
•-> »•/
7 i"
~< ^
V /
7 3
V j
7 L
"»" _i l
UMUM | |
IN _,_!_
!»[» DAYS (UK)
AL SALlPltS TA«
SEXCKDINGMA
ftlGH
/ /
v/
1 (
r /
/ y
r /
•v- 1-
j' /
V-7
f V
j1 /
,i\f
^' V
t '•
t i
V '
f If
^ X
i F
i f
i i
L_I i
1INC
H |
i.Ov/
/ V
f 0
/ /
/- /
7. i
I'./
f, V
,f i -"
f'. -i'
l"/
,1'. J1
r -5
/ j-
7 /
7 c
,' ^
7 J
f t»
i. 10
i.'l
^1-1°
-trlr
1 1.
J__ L
AND All ATTACHMENTS AUC
1ION 11 THUI. AC.CUIIAIl. A"f
d
LU
4/1
5
10
20
30
d
K
^
-------
r
H CHEMICAL COMPANY
DLAUD DIV
DLAND
•: <*66<40
nr» KUMrtl ll~l fpfHMll NUMBIA I t'J ~»»LL NUMKl H
»9001 J Ll1I(>4>OQB68j L560136_
MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT FQR
IMIS IS YUUH MON1MLY HCPOnT f OHM I OH
SEE HEVERSE SIDE FOR RETURN MAIL
Pluic complete «nd lulimu I wo copies ol ihii luim
n\ the end ol cucli month Tint icpoil mull u-icli our
Laming olliiL' by Hie lOih ol Ilic month.
PART 1 - RETURN 70 DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
Apr, I
1985T
n 4470
4B31 ««
< ti '~
DOH CHEMICAL COMPANY
OUTFALL I 031
PROC.HASTES TO TITTABAMASSEE'R. 031
PERMIT EXPIRATIONj JO/79
Dole loim was
pnnlcd
M*Ol, I
n i
•
11616
OLIFORH-
_1 HF/l'i
GAILY AVG
1
1
1
FECA
QML:
MAXI
4 oo
HIGH
1
L-
HUH
tow
.._.
I
»«.oE
MUM
bCH L,l
-^
i-
1
L SAVCI IS T
1 *CU Inf..
•• • » ¥ (Jk
1
i ..
-.-L
i
«,,l
Mi,*
-l-
J L_
_L _L-
1 .!._
INu
J_E:
J L
1_L
,
' I- '
MUM]
1 .
f
L l
i .
-
|
1
01 LY AVG
1
1
1
|
1
-
1
|
1
i
—
-
HIGH
LOW
1
_
1
1
1
-
i
_i
VEHACI ' , , , ,
AXIMOV, , , ,
1 1 1 1 1
uk'gER TITS RtPORTlNG
OTAl SiVPl ES TAKEN
A>^ [RCllUlNC MAXIMU'
"»""-' J ,V
puf furicii lit *
i
i i
L 1 1
L_
1 1
,
L j
1 1
1 1
1
DAILY AVG
HIGH
'
1
I
J
LOW
VEHAGE
AXIMUM
1
ur.'BEB DAYS REPORTING
OIAl '.kit
HEST
*rs EP PUNCH in Ml
1 CHUlFY uriDtR f'ENALTY OF IAW 1IIAT
IHAI l)A'.,lll (JTi MY INQUIRY flF 1HUSF
1 lit. II i 1 II 1 ' M / W/.M IMA III III AMI
OBSERVATION •VISUL'
•,0'TO'«' '"'
HAXIHUH
0 "
DAILY AVG.
^
c
c
,
a
ll
('
f
t
C
c
0
1
i>
c
(
f
(
I
r
f:
0
C
f
u
VERAGE
AXIMUM
HIGH
LOW
'
ill |£>
ill |t>
It l l l 1
i 1 1 i 1 l
UMBER DAYS REPORTING
OTAL SAMPLES TAKEN
AYS EXCEEDING MAXIMUM
2 \l
"i ,6
W M.I VIOL | , , ,
DUP PUNCH I'l Ml
.
i
DAILY AVG
HIGH
1
1
AVERAGE
MAXIMUM
LOW
.
II 1 1 i 1
II II i
1 1 1 II
1 1 J 1
UM8ER DAYS flEPO TING
OTAL SAMPLES TAK N
AYb EXCEEDING MAXIMUM
VC MAX V
01 1 1
1
1 1
1
DUP PUNCH I'hMI
Consumers Power
Intake cfs
. . -
i
DAILY AVG
,
,
0
c
o
r
(
I
*'
1.1
^
^ ,
a
t
(•
i.
o
,-.
^
c,
n
(
{•
i
AVERAGE
/AXIMUM
HIGH
,
LOW
, , , i ,0
ii i i I 1^
it lilt
i 1 i i 1 i
UMBER DAYS REPORTING
OTAL SAMPLES TAKEN
AYS EXCEEDING MAXIMUM
3|(
, ,
,
« "" V'°l III LI
DUP PUNCH Ilk Ml
Consumers Power
Slowdown cfs
i
DAILY AVG
o
,'
0
C,
f:
n
0
n
r.
u
£
I)
I '
<''
<..
c
L
C
. _
r.
r
f
(-•
AVERAGE ,
MAXIMUM ,
1 -
L J
HIGH
i l
i i
i i
1 1
IUM«EH DAYS REPORTING
OTAL SAMPLES TAKEN
AYS EXCEEDING MAXIMUM
VC MAX VlOi
IOW
1
1°
1
L 1 '
bit
1 1
L_L_
i t i
OUP PUNCH I'k Ml
5
10
IS
20
25
30
1 HAVE PERSONALLY EXAMINED AND AM FAMILIAR WITH THE INfOIIMATION SUOMintD IN THIS DOCUMENT AND ALL ATTACHMENTS AND
INUIVIDUAI S IMMIDIAT/ly1 XrSI'ONUIUir IOH OKIAIVINO THE INIOIIMATION. 1 HtllEVE THAT THE INfOflMAIION IS TflU'E ACCUHAH, ANO
Mil JIIK.ANI 1 I/Ml III 'f Irtfl V,UIIMII IV if, 1 AIM 1(1 I/I M/MIUIJ, ini IIIHNI, 1 1 II I'd!,'. Hill 1 1 r 1)1 Hill A'tll IMnil'.OIIMI Ml
L',r
z v
o
C
' k C
(9
-------
DOW CHEMICAL USA
MICHIGAN DIVISION — MIDLAND PLANT
o
NON-CONVENTIONAL/TOXIC POLLUTANTS — OUTFALL 031
PERMIT tfMI 0000868
TABLE 1
Monitoring Results - March, 1985
Phenol
2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic
acid
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
Chloroform
2,3,7,8-Tetrachloro-
dibenzo-p-dioxin
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethylene
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Pentachlorophenol
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichorobenzene
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Methylene Chloride
2-Chlorophenol
2,4-Dichlorophenol
Naphthalene
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Bromoform
Chlorobenzene
Carbon Tetrachloride
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
Acrylonitrile
Monthly
Average
(Ibs/day)
—
»,020
.3
2.4
6.1x10~6
—
—
—
^3.2
.2
.5
.3
—
—
—
—
3.3
2.9
— •
5.8
.5
.6
_«
Daily
Maximum
(Ibs/day)
—
».020
.5
4.8
10.2x10~6
1.4
1.6
.2
3.6
.3
.7
.6
.2
—
.6
—
4.3
4.2
.2
6.6
.8
.7
__
Monthly Daily
Average Maximum
(ug/D (ug/1)
ND(0.8)
35
3
21
28ppq
ND(7)
ND(7)
ND(7)
23
2
4
4
ND(8)
ND(0.7)
ND(1)
ND(0.3)
19
14
ND(6)
32
6
3
ND(2)
—
40
3
28
44ppq
6
7
1
25
2
6
4
.8
—
4
—
27
18
1
42
6
3
__
Mass discharge measured at 031a
-------
DOW CHEMICAL USA
MICHIGAN DIVISION — MIDLAND PLANT
NON-CONVENTIONAL/TOXIC POLLUTANTS — OUTFALL 031
PERMIT ffMI 0000868
TABLE 2
Monitoring Results March, 1985
Phenol
2,4-Dichlorophenoxy
acetic acid
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
Chloroform
2,3i7,8-Tetrachloro-
dibenzo-p-dioxin
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethylene
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Pentachlorophenol
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-dichorobenzene
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Methylene Chloride
2-Chlorophenol
2,4-Dichlorophenol
Napthalene
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Bromoform
Chlorobenzene
Carbon Tetrachloride
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
Acrylonitrile
Concentration
Pg/liter
ND(0.7)
no
3
28
12ppq*
ND(7)
ND(10)
ND(7)
22
2
6
3
ND(8)
ND(0.7)
ND(1.2)
ND(0.3)
27
10
ND(6)
42
6
ND(0.6)
ND(2)
Sample Concentration
Date Ug/iiter
2/27/85
2/27/85
2/27/85
3/4/85
2/21/85
3/4/85
3/4/85
3/4/85
2/27/85
2/27/85
2/27/85
2/27/85
3/4/85
2/27/85
2/27/85
2/27/85
3/4/85
3/4/85
3/4/85
3/4/85
2/27/85
2/27/85
3/4/85
NDC0.8)
36
3
13
44ppq»
6
7
1
23
2
4
4
0.8
ND(0.7)
14
ND(0.3)
10
18
1
22
5
3
NDC.7)
Sample
Date
3/4/85
3/4/85
3/4/85
3/18/85
3/5/85
3/18/85
3/18/85
3/18/85
3/4/85
3/4/85
3/4/85
3/4/85
3/8/85
3/4/85
3/4/85
3/4/85
3/18/85
3/18/85
3/18/85
3/18/85
3/4/85
3/4/85
3/18/85
ND = Not Detected
() = Lowest Detection Limit
-------
Capillary Column GC/HRMS Operating Parameters
Section C: Methods Section
GC Parameters:
22 m glass capillary column (WCOT) coated with SE-30.
Injection port temperature 260°C.
Column temperature 80°C.
The column temperature was manually programmed (34°C/min) to
270°C exactly six minutes after injection of sample. J
GC transfer line into MS ion source was maintained at 255°C.
The GC/MS retention time of 2,3,7,8-TCDD was 14 min, 30 sec, ±
15 sec. The retention time was stable and reproducible during
daily operation but did change over a period of days.
MS Parameters:
Ion source temperature 240°C.
Variable acceleration voltage.
Electron energy 70 ev.
2 Ma filament emission.
Mass resoltuion 7,000-9,000.
Multiplier gain greater than 10 .
Multi-ion selection (MIS) technique, electric peak jumping mode.
Cl-TCDD integration rate 100 milliseconds.
Cl-TCDD integration rate 30 milliseconds.
Details of these analyses were as described in a report to you dated
20 December 1978 on this subject.
-------
Section C. Methods Section
Analysis of Environmental Samples for 2,3,7,8-TCDD
using High Resolution Capillary Column
Gas Chromatography Interfaced with
High Resolution Mass Spectrometry
-------
26) Using a slow stream of dry nitrogen, carefully concentrate
the benzene solution at room temperature tb a volume of 60 jui.
27) Using a 100 jul syringe, place the extract into a 3 mm id x 10 cm
glass tube that has been pre-sealed at the bottom.
23) Seal the open end of the glass tube with a torch.
29) Extract Is stored in freezer ur.ril it can'be analyzed by mass
spectrometry.
-------
26) Using a slow stream of dry nitrogen, carefully concentrate
the benzene solution at room temperature tb a volume of 60>ul.
27) Using a 100 jil syringe, place the extract into a 3 mm id x 10 cm
glass tube that has been pre-sealed at the bottom.
28) Seal the open end of the. glass tube with a torch.
29) Extract is stored in freezer ur.ril it can'-be analyzed by mass
spectrometry.
-------
until the aqueous layer is neutralized Cfizzing ceases).
Discard aqueous layer.
13) Prewash the drying column containing 10 cm anhydrous
with 25 jnl hexane. Discard washings. Place a Kuderna-Danish
apparatus C250 ml flask equipped with a 10 ml concentrator
tube) beneath the column as a receiver. Drain the hexane
layer from the separatory funnel into the column containing
the Na^CO-j. Rinse the separatory funnel with several ml hexane,
Allow ringings to drain into column. After the hexane fil-
ters through the Na^CO^ into the Kuderna-Danish concentrator,
vash. the column with 25 ml hexane. Collect washings in K-D.
14) Place a carborundun boiling chip into the K-D concentrator
and attach a 3"ball Snyder column. Using a .steam bath, con-
. centrate the hexane extract . to a volume of 3-4 ml.
15) Place a waste container beneath a column of activated alumina.
Pre-wet the column with, 1 ml hexane. By means -of a 9 inch
disposable Pasteur pipet, transfer the hexane extract from the
concentrator tube onto the alumina column.
16) After the last portion of hexane is removed from the tube and
placed on the column, .pour 3 ml CC1/ onto the concentrator tube.
17) Vnen the hexane drains into the NaSO^, pipet the CCl^ onto the
column.
18) Using the same technique, continue eluting the column with an
additional 3 ml CCl^ followed by A ml CH C12. Collect the
eluant into a 12 ml distillation receiver.
19) Place a carborundum boiling chip into the receiver, add a micro
Snyder column and concentrate the Cl^C^ eluant to a volume of
approx. 100 fi~L by boiling gently on a hot water bath.
20) Add 2 ml hexane through the Snyder column and again concentrate
to approx. 100
21") Repeat step 20.
22) Pour 3 ml hexane into the receiver tube and repeat steps 15 — 19
23) Pour 2 ml benzene through the Snyder column. Using a boiling
vater bath, concentrate the benzene to a volume of 100 - 200 /il.
24) Repeat step 23.
25) Using a 100 >ul syringe, transfer the benzene solution into a •
2 ml chromaflex sample tube. Rinse the receiver tube with two
separate 200 jul portions of benzene. Boil the benzene each
time to rinse down the sides of the receiver tube. Transfer
the rinses to the sample tube.
-------
Extraction and Cleanup
1) Accurately wfcigh 10 g of tissue into a 100 ml round bottom
flask.
2) Add 20 ml ethanol to the flask. Using a 100>ul syringe,.
fortify the sample with AO ;ul of the working TCDD standard
(40/il - 20 ng - 2ppb). Add AO ml A5Z aqueous KOH and
place a 1 inch teflon coated stir bar into the flask.
(Note - For adipose samples only, add 15 ml distilled water
to the flask.)
3) Place a teflon sleeve on the ground glass joint of a water-
cooled Liebig condenser.. Attach the flask to the condenser.
Using a .heatingjmantle,'.heat* the. solution under gentle re-
flux with magnetic^ stir-ring lfor''2*5 hours.-
4) Allow the solution to cool and pour 25 ml of hexane through
the condenser into the flask.
5) Detach the flask from the condenser and pour the mixture into
a 250 ml separatory funnel. Rinse the flask with 10 ml ethanol
followed by 20 ml hexane.
6) Shake the separatory funnel vigorously for one minute, allow
the phases ~to separate, and drain the aqueous layer (bottom)
into a second 250 ml separatory funnel. Drain the hexane
layer into the original 100 ml flask.
7) Reextract the aqueous layer with three separate 25 ml portions
h/ixane. Combine all but the last hexane extract into the flask.
Allow the.last hexane extract to remain in the separatory funnel.
8) Pour the combined hexane extracts from the flask into the separa-
tory funnel containing the fourth extract. Rinse the flask with
two separate 5 ml portions ethanol followed by two separate 5 ml
portions hexane.
9) Add 25 ml IN KOH to the separatpry funnel, ana< shake vigorously
for one minute. Allow the phases to separate and discard the
basic wash..
10) Add 50 ml concentrated sulfuric acid to the separatory funnel,
shake with frequent venting of pressure for one minute. Allow
phases to separate fully and discard the sulfuric acid.
11. Wash hexane layer with three additional 50 ml portions of con-
centrated sulfuric acid. Discard the acid each time.
12. Pour 25 ml distilled water into the separatory funnel and
vash hexane with frequent venting of pressure. Allow layers
to separate and add'powdered NaoCO^ portion-wise with a spatula
-------
Apparatus
1) Chromatographic columns (alumina) - disposable Pasteur Pipet,
5 3/4 inches long (Scientific Products). Prepare column as
follows: Gently tamp a plug of glass vool into the bottom of
a 5 3/4 inch disposable Pasteur pipet. Pour Woelm neutral
alumina into the pipet while tapping the column with a pencil
until a height of.4.5 cm of alumina is packed into the column.
Top the alumina with 0.5 cm of anhydrous granular Na2S04. Pre-
wash. tKe column with 3 ml CH2C12. Allow the CH^C^ to drain
from tne column, then force the remaining CH2C12 from the
column,with, a stream of dry nitrogen. Place prepared columns
"in an oven set at 225°C. Store columns in the oven until
ready for use, .at least overnight. Remove only the columns
needed and place them in a dessicator over Drierite until they
have equilibrated to room temperature. . Use immediately.
2) Drying column - 11 mm id x 39 cm glass column equipped with
a 125 ml reservoir and teflon stopcock ^nd removable drip tip.
Prepare column as follows: Tamp a plug of glass wool into
the bottom of the column just above the stopcock. Pour anhy-
drous powdered sodium carbonate into the column with gentle
tapping until a height of 10 cm is obtained.
-------
Glassware
Separatory funnels (ground glass stopper and teflon stopcock) -
250 ml.
Pipers (Pasteur) disposable - Scientific Products,5' 3/4 inches
9 inches
Ctnndard wall pyrex glass tubing — O.D. 3mm
Colurm - 11 mm i.d. x 39 cm, equipped with teflon stopcock and
125 ml reservoir.
Crystallizing dish (used for hot water bath) - Scientific Products,
diaaeter 150 mm
height 75 mm
The following obtained from Kontes Glass Co.; Vineland, New Jersey:
Flasks,' round bottom (§" 14/20) - 100 ml
Condensers, Llebig (£ 14/20)
Tojdcrna ^ Danish, concentrator - 3 ball Snyder column, 250 ml
reservoir, 10 ml concentrator tube.
Micro Snyder column C$ 14/20)
Distillation receiver, graduated ($ 14/20) -= Capacity 12 ml.
Chronaflex Cample tube C^10/18) - Capacity 2 ml.
Funnels, powder (Jl4/20).
Stoppers ($ 14/20 and ~£ 10/18),
-------
Reagents
1) Sodium carbonate (anhydrous powder) - Mallinckrodt, AR
grade. Soxhlet extracted with methylene chloride for
2 hr. and dried at 200°C.
» t
2) Sodium sulfate - Mallinckrodt,.AR grade.. Soxhlet extracted
with methylene chloride for 2 hr. and dried at 200 °C.
3) Potassium hydroxide (pellets) - Mallinekrodt, AR grade.
A) Sulfuric acid - Mallinckrodt, AR grade.
5) Benzene, dichloromethane, hexane, ethyl alcohol - Mallinckrodt,
nanograde.
6) Carbon tetrachloride - Fisher, ACS grade (water .01% max.)
7) Distilled water - Free of organic impurities.
8) Alumina - Woelm neutral,.activity grade I (ICN Pharmacenticals,
26201 Miles Ave., Cleveland, OHIO 44128).
9) Drierite (anhydrous calcium sulfate) - Scientific Products.
-------
Standard
37
1) Internal Standard Solution - 2,3,7,8-ClJ -tetrachlorodibenzo-
p-dioxin (XCDD) (Eco-Control, Inc.; 71 Rogers Street; Cambridge,
Mass. 02U2)
Make all dilutions with nanograde benzene. Store all solutions
in freezer.
a) Stock-Solution - 1.5 jug/ml. Dissolve 200 ing of Cl37 -
chlorinated dioxin mixture containing exactly 0.150 mg
of 2.3,7,8-Cl37-TCDD (isotopic purity 982 Cl37) in 75
ml of boiling benzene in a 100 ml volumetric flask. Di-
lute the solution to volume with hot benzene and allow
the flask to equilibrate to room temperature. Dilute
to volume with, benzene, and mix.
5) • •WoTklfflg "Solution - 0.5 /ig/ml. Pipet 30 ml stock solution
into a 100 ml volumetric flask* Pipet 60 ml benzene into
'flask and mix. Mark volume.
-------
PROCEDURE FOR THE EXTRACTION AND CLEANUP
OF TISSUE SAMPLES FOR 2,3,7,8 - TETRACHLORODIBENZO-P-DIOXIN (TCDD)
EPA- Pesticides Monitoring
Bay St. Louis, Mississippi
-------
8. Add 100 ml of CH-C1. to the separatory funnel and repeat the
extraction. Again drain the CH Clj through a funnel containing
Na SO into the same A liter flask.
2 4
9. Repeat step 8.
10. Add 2 liters of pesticide quality CH-C^ to the same flask and
attach it to the soxhlet apparatus.
11. Heat the CH Cl- under reflux into the carbon for 16 hours.
22
12. Remove the round bottom flask from the soxhlet apparatus, add
a Snyder column and evaporate all of the CE^CIj from the flask.
13. Transfer the residue by rinsing with CH Cl_ into a 50 ml graduate
cylinder equipped with a ground glass stopper.
14. Build the volume to 50 ml with C^Cl-, place a glass stopper in
the cylinder and shake to ensure complete mixing.
15. Place 10 ml of this extract into a 100 ml round bottom flask.
Evaporate the CH Cl^ completely off by means of a steam bath-.
16. Proceed with steps 2 through 25 as described in the tissue
procedure.
-------
Procedure Used for the Extraction and Cleanup
Of Carbon Filtered Water Samples for TCDD
Note: To our knowledge, there are no existing extraction procedures
for removing 2,3,7,8-TCDD from carbon materials. No carbon
filters were received at our laboratory through which water
containing a known quantity of 2,3,7,8-TCDD was passed. There-
fore, neither the trapping efficiency on carbon nor the ex-
traction efficiency from carbon for TCDD are known nor could
they be ascertained by us due to the lack of proper controls.
The procedure used by us is one which generally extracts a
wide variety of organic compounds; however, there is no
guarantee that TCDD is extracted.
If TCDD is identified in the extract, we cannot verify that
it was quantitatively extracted. If TCDD does not appear in
the extract, it is possible that the TCDD is trapped on the
carbon and not efficiently extracted by this procedure.
1. Transfer the wet carbon filter material to the extractor tank of
a large scale soxhlet extractor.
2. Pour three liters of pesticide quality acetone into a A liter
round bottom flask and attach the flask to the soxhlet apparatus.
3. Heat the acetone under reflux into the carbon for 16 hours.
A. Remove the round bottom flask from the soxhlet apparatus. Add a
Snyder column and evaporate the acetone completely by means of
a steam both.
5. Transfer the remaining aqueous solution to a 1,000 ml separatory
funnel. Rinse the round bottom flask with two-100 ml portions
of CH Cl and transfer the rinsings to the separatory funnel.
6. Stopper the separatory funnel and shake vigorously for 1 minute.
7. Allow the layers to separate and drain the lower (CH^C^) layer
through a funnel containing Na-SO, into a A liter round bottom
flask.
-------
Procedure for the Extraction and Cleanup of Sludge Samples for TCDD
1. Weigh 10 g of sludge into a 100 ml round bottom flask.
2. Proceed with steps 2 through A in the tissue procedure.
3. Detach the flask from the condenser and decant the mixture
through a filter containing glass wool into a 250 ml separatory
funnel. Rinse the flask with 10 ml of ethanol followed by 20 ml
hexane and decant rinsings through the funnel into a 250 ml
separatory funnel.
A. Shake the separatory funnel vigorously for one minute, allow
the phases to separate, and drain the aqueous layer into a second
250 ml separatory funnel. Drain the hexane layer into a 250 ml
Erlenmeyer flask.
5. Proceed with steps 7 through 25 in the tissue procedure.
-------
Procedure for the Extraction and Cleanup of Water Samples for TCDD
1. Place 500 g of water in a 1,000 ml separator/ funnel. Fortify with
37C1-TCDD.
2. Add 100 ml of methylene chloride to the separatory funnel and shake
vigorously for about 1 minute.
3. Allow the layers to separate and drain lower layer (CH C12) into a
500 ml Erlenmeyer flask.
4. Repeat steps 2 and 3 twice more.
5. Place a Snyder column onto the 500 ml Erlenmeyer flask, add boiling
beads and concentrate the CH C10 to near dryness on a steam bath.
22
6. Add 100 ml of hexane through the Snyder column into the 500 ml Erlen-
meyer flask and concentrate this to near dryness.
7. Allow the flask to cool, add 30 ml of hexane through the column.
8. Remove the Snyder column and transfer the hexane into a 250 ml separa-
tory funnel. Rinse the flask with two separate 10 ml portions of hexane
and add these to the separatory funnel.
9. Wash the hexane with 50 ml of 1 N KOH.
10. Proceed with steps 10 through 29 as described in the Tissue Procedure.
-------
Attachment B. Methods Section
Sample Preparation
-------
Decoding of Samples Shipped to EPA-RTP on 2/7/79
Sample
Shipment Sample Sample
Number '."umber Type
DW-1 EA05S28
DW-2 Q.C. 1
Sample
Description
Sample
Wt. (g)
--Fortification Level
ng Cl-TCDD ppt native I
water Dow Chetn. In- 500
Plant (2,4-D
process to deep
well
water distilled water 500
0.2
DS-1 EA05S18A
sludge
DCW-1 EA05S10
DCW-2 EA05S03
DO?-3 EA05S04
blank
carbon
carbon
filtered
water
carbon
filtered
water
Dow Chem. In-
Plant (phenol
treatment sys-
tem waste)
dry carbon
powder in fil-
ter
Dow Chem.
effluent
10
920,000
Tittabawasee 1,150,000
River upstream
at Dow Bridge
-------
Attachment A. Methods Section
Sample Identification Codes
-------
Table 1.
CRITERIA USED FOR CONFIRMATION OF 2,3,7,8-TCDD RESIDUES IN HUMAN
AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES
1. Capillary Column GC/MS retention time of 2,3,7,8-TCDD.
2. Co-injection of sample plus 35 Cl-2,3,7,8-TCDD standard.
3. Molecular ion Cl isotope ratio (M/E 320 and M/E 322),
A. Capillary column GC/HRMS multiple ion monitoring response-
(Simultaneous response for elemental composition of M/E 320,
M/E 322, and M/E 328).
5. Response of M/E 320 and M/E 322 greater than 2.5 times the noise
level.
-------
Results for Analyses of Environmental Samples
from Michigan - (EPA Region V)
for 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD)
Analyses by The Analytical Chemistry Branch
Members of: Environmental Toxicology Division
Health Effects Research Laboratory
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 (MD-69)
Samples Prepared The EPA Pesticides Monitoring Lab
by Members of: Office of Toxic Substances
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
Bay St. Louis, Mississippi 39529
Date: 9 April 1979
-------
APPENDIX B-5
PCDDs and PCDFs
1981 USEPA Study
-------
arger: Dow Chemical Co. Midland, MI
a Date: September 3-10, TJB1
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION V
Eastern District Oi'flce
Large Volume Water Samples
'LE TYPE
J MGD '
'ERATURE 'C
(S.U.)
DUCTIVITY vmho/cm
AMETER
2.3.7.8 TCOD
Ortnrhlnrn <«nnif»r<
Pnlyrhlnrinatpd fHhf>n?of
2 3.7.8 TCDF
T*»t rurhlnrn <«ftm*r<
H»v«rh1nrft 1«nmpr<
Mpptarhlnrn <
1.63 •
3.8V
.—
Outfall 005
24 EVC
0755-0450
3.5
17.5-21.5
7.2-7.5
570-770
(1 Isomers)
< 120*
2700/K1
< ?Q
< tin
< 00
< 100
1700
42007
56007
507
< 80
< 100
ttl
4)
1)
Gross
ID'5
Ibs/da
..
K 71
•t •
4.96'.'
12.26
16.35
O.H
OUtfall 031
24 EVC
0900-0630
34.6
18-20
6.7-7 0
4000-5500
PPq/
(1 isomers)
50
RO/^2)
< 20
V 40
< 80
<100
790
9000/M
190/(6
< 40
< 80
< |UU
1
Gross
10'5
Ibs/da
1.44 "
9.n
••
--
«
22.80
250. 7l
b.48
—
Outfall 031
Plume Mixing Zone
24 EVC
0935-0645
' 18-20
7.1-7.5
2200-4500
ppq/ ,
(f Isomers)
45
50/M)
< 40-
< 1
-------
I. niOKIN METHODOLOGY - WATE.1
The objective of this study was to analyze selected polychlorinated
dibenzofurans (PCDF) and polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDD) in
water. The detection limits specified for these compounds were parts-
p»r-quaurillion (1 part in 1015 or ppq). Specific compounds vihich
were selected for identification included: 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzofuran
(2,3,7,S-TCDF), 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (2,3,7,8-TCDD), and
all zzz-s. through octa chloro furan and dioxin isoners. High resolution
gas chromatography/high resolution nass spectrometry (HRGC/HRMS) was used
to identify ar.d quantify these naterials at the indicated trace level.
The exact masses used for each isomer class and the expected isotope
ratio u3=sd in part for identifying individual compounds, as veil as
limits of detection for the water are presented in Table 1. 2,3,7,8-
tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin-13c^2 was used as an internal standard for
quantification and recovery determinations. These recovery determinations
are found in Table 2 and were used to estimate the influence of the
matrices on the analytical ceasurenents.
Preparation of Water Samples
The water samples were extracted and cleaned-up using the following
procedure. A ten liter aliquot of water was transferred from the
original sample bottle to a 19 liter glass bottle, and spiked with
2 ng of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin-C12 (2,3,7,8-TCDD-13C12).
The water aliquot and internal standard were mixed for 30 minutes
using a magnetic stirring bar. After the initial mixing, the stirring
was discontinued and one liter of hexane was added to the aliquot for
extraction of organics. The stirring was resumed and the aliquot
extracted for 16 hours. After the extraction process, the aliquot
and hexane were allowed to equilibrate for two hours. The hexane was
transferred to a 1000 nl Kuderna-Danish (K-D) flask using a 100 ml-
volumetric pipet. Distilled water was added to the bottle to force
the last 100 ml or less of hexane into the neck of the bottle which
facilitated its transfer. The K-D flasks were placed in a hot water
bath and the extracts were concentrated to a volume of 20 ml. The •
extracts were transferred to 250 ml separatory funnels, using three
5 ml hexane rinses of the K-D flask.' The hexane extracts were washed ."
three .tines each in the .following sequence: 50 ml of 1M NaOH, 50 ml
of distilled water, 50 ml of concentrated H2S04, and finally 50 ml
of distilled water. All base, acid and water washes were collected,
neutralized and discarded. The hexane extracts were transferred to
125 nl K-D flasks, using three 5 ml hexane rinses of 250 separatory
funnels, and concentrated to a volume of 5 ml. The extracts were
introduced onto alumina columns to isolate the furan and dioxin
compound classes. The columns were eluted sequentially with 25 ml
of hercane, 25 nl of 1:1 (V:Y) hexane:carbon tetrachloride, and 20 ml
of 1:1 (V:V) hexane:methylene chloride. Decane (20 ul) was added to
the hexane:methylene chloride fraction containing the furans and
dioxins, and the fraction concentrated to 20 ul prior to analyses.
-------
The extracts were analyzed by high resolution gas chro.-natography/
hish resolution mass spectroaetry (HRGC/HRMS) at a mass resolution
of 8000-12000 (H&H, 10 percent valley). A VG Model 7070H mass
spactroneter interfaced to a Carlo Erba Model 4160 gas chromatograph
v;as used. The chromatogrnphic column was a 30M D3-5 fused silica
column with heliuta carrier gas. All HRGC/HRMS data were acquired
in the -ultiple ion detection mode using a VG Model 2035 Data System
and -ill ba archived on magnetic tape for a period of five years.
II. QUALITY COTTTROI,
A. Internal Audits
The following quality assurance procedures V7ere eraployed.
Perfluorokerosene was introduced through a heated inlet for tuning,
mass calibration and establishing mass resolution. A 2 ul injection
of a test mixture containing 20 pg/ul of 2,3,7,8-TCDD and 95 pg/ul of
2,3,7,8-TCDD-3"5Cj_2 was analyzed. The analysis of this test mixture
provided the following information:
formation concerning sensitivity (absolute response
2,3,7,8-TCDD-13C12) .
r* ._ • f^ . • s . •
0 Information
of 2, . ,
* Accuracy of quantification (native response as compared
to that of its C—13 analogue)
* Elution within a specific retention time window
*• * Chronatographic peak shape symmetry.
Decane was analyzed to check for dioxin carry "over. This
information is used to access performance of the instrument before
the measurement of PCDF and PCDD at trace levels is conducted in
actual samples. . - '
The actual sample analyses were by the following procedure:
four to six samples, a duplicate or spike, an extraction blank, a •
test mixture, a decane blank, then the cycle was repeated.
B. External Audits ' ........ ""- -".." ; V . '.•
* * s *•_ •"•*
1. On-site Visit " -
Curing Septeaber 20-21, 1982, Marcia A. Kuehl> QC Coordinator
for the Central Regional Laboratory, toured the Battelle Columbus dioxin
facilities and audited the chain-of-custody documentation. She spent
a large portion of the time observing the acquisition and reduction of
the dixoin/furan data by HRGC/HRMS.
-------
The objective of this audit t:as Co inspect whether the
analysis of Dow Study samples was conducted according to Contract £68-01-6421,
(Amendment to Work Assignment Specifications 2003) and to present and resolve
any anonalous results reported by Battelle for the blind QC samples that
CPxt. submitted along with the actual samples.
Document Control Study
When the Dow samples arrived at Battelle,-the secured shipping
and receiving area contacted the team responsible for the project. An
authorized person signed for the samples and transported them to the
Dio:dLa Extraction Laboratory. There the samples were unpacked and checked
against the packing list. They were then recorded in the GCA Project File
logbook along with a Battelle number. All logbook entries were of the
forra XXYYZZ where XX indicates the logbook number, YY the page of entry
and ZZ the line number of the page.
Only three people had keys to the Dioxin Extraction Laboratory
and sample storage area. As the extraction of the samples proceeded; all
extraction notes were entered in the GCA Project File logbook according
to the format above. When the extracts were ready for HRGC/HRMS, they.
were picked up by Dan Aichele, and all HRGC/HRMS work pertaining to the
samples was entered in the HRGC/HRMS logbook, with cross-references
to the extract numbers obtained froa the GCA Project File logbook kept
in the locked Dioxin Extraction Laboratory. All computer outputs and
raw HRGC/HRMS data was filed by CRL sample number designation in a
file box kept in the HRGC/HRMS laboratory^ The discs containing Dow.
sample KRGC/HRMS data were also stored there.
The entire Battelle facility is a security area. In order
for visitors to gain entry, they must fill out a visitors card indicating
their affiliation and Battelle employee to be contacted. A visitor's
badge is typed which indicates that a Battelle escort is required at
all°tiiaes. Bnployees wear identification badges and can only gain"
entry by a coded keycard or by showing their ID card to a receptionist*.
Battelle personnel were careful to not divulge the exact nature of . .
the analytical .work being done on other projects, nor to name any.
other clients. . '• . • . ' : - - .- .
All of the GCA Project File logbook information, relating
HRGC/KRMS logbook Information, and raw computer printouts was photocopied
and submitted with the final draft of the report on 12/30/82. The final
report was peer reviewed at Battelle and was sent to GCA (prime Contractor)
as required by the contract. The photocopied logbook and raw data was
sent directly to the CRL on 12/30/82 along with a copy of the final report.
-------
Battclle QA/QC Protocols
A decane solvent blank and 2>3,7>8-TCDD-13Cl2 standard was run at
least once a day. The area response of the 2,3,7 ,8-TCDD-*3Cl2 standard
must ba approximately 4000 and no less than 2000. The ion peak ratio
at n/z of 320 to 322 and 332 to 334 nust be 0.77 ± 10X. This ion peak
ratio for the native 2,3,7,8-TCDD to 2,3,7,8-TCDD-13Cl2 must be within
10% cf tha expected ratio for the analysis to be acceptable.
A seven-point calibration curve of 2,3,7,8-TCDD is run every 6 nonths.
Each day, the saaples are injected to insure that they are within the
linear raage before actual data reduction/quantitation is done. Two
injections of each extract were made to monitor precision of the
2,3,7,8-TCDD-C13 recovery. For all of the Dow Samples, 2,3,7,8-TCDD-C13
was used as the internal standard. No historically based control limits
for 2,3,7,8-TCDD-J"3C12 recovery from water and fish have been set by
Battelle. Recovery information is found in Table 2.
No splitting of Dow Samples into lab-prepared duplicates was done.
No lab spiking of actual Dow Samples to serve as a natrix spike was
done either. The blind QC samples submitted by CRL served in these
functions. ' • •
Quantification Procedure
Before any samples, standards or blanks are injected into the
Carlo Erba HRGC and VG 7070H HRMS system, the instrument is tuned by
the perfluorokerosene lock mass of 319. The response of the MS to this
corapound must neet the mass criteria specified before samples are injected. *
The VG 7070H electronics were modified by Battelle personnel to allow
more rapid scans over the acquisition tine, and thus give greater resolution
and lower detection levels.
All quantitation is done on the basis of a one-point calibration
standard of 2,3,7,8-TCDDrC13. Qualitative identification .is done on
the "basis of retention time. The correct raa'ss ratio Qh 10%) of the ; • .
isomsr^s .two largest peaks is also used-for verification of .identity. "* •
The siaplified formulas used are given below:
COSC pg/g = 2000 pg 2,3,7,8-TCDD-C13 x area of analyte in sample
area of 2,3,7,8-TCDD-ci3 in sample
weight of sample (g)
detection limit » 2.5 x area of analyte in sample x 2000 pg •
area of 2,3,7,8-TCDD-C1-1 in sample . .
sample weight
-------
2. Blind QC Water Sample Results
QC samples were prepared and originally analyzed by
Dr. Robert llarless, EPA-RTP. They were sent to Curtis Ross, Director CRL,
EPA Region V to use as part of the Quality Assurance program audit of
Battelle Columbus Laboratories for this study. The water QC samples
were received, in sealed ampules with benzene as the solvent. These
ampules vere opened by CRL personnel at Argonne National Laboratory and
nixed with approximately 25 liters of organic free v/ater to form the blind
QC saaples. CRL saaple numbers were assigned to the blind QC samples to
further aid in disguising them.
Before any analytical data was generated, a comparison of
EPA 2,3,7,8-TCDD standard (82LS10R05) was made with the Battelle prepared
quantitation standard. The EPA standard was previously round robin-tested
and found to contain 10 pg/ul (600 pg in the 60 ul ampule). .A variation
of only •*• 10% was allowed between Battelle and this EPA standard. Four
additional standards in benzene were then analyzed for 2,3^7, 8-TCDD;
1,3,6,8-TCDD; 1,3,7,9-TCDD; 2,3,7,8-TCDF; OCDD and OCDF.
After these standards were judged acceptable by Dr. Harless,
a blind QC spike (81EH07S09) was analyzed and reported next. After
acceptance of this data, actual sample and other blind analysis began.
Results of all blind standards and samples are given in Table 3.
Recovery Comments • .
1) 81EH07S23(Spike QC) - OCDF was reported at a much higher level
than the spiked ""Tn'e"dia't:a was re-reduced and the result of 230 ppt was
verified. The problems in OCDD and OCDF recoveries appear to stem from
the lack of a OCDD-C13 standard to check the actual response against
the internal standard. • - .
2) 81EH07S24 (Blank QC) - OCDF at a level of 180 ppq was reported.
No OCDF x,*as~present"in"the"ljC"ampule used to mix this sample. The data
was recalled from .disc and the result reverified at 230 ppq. If this
.QC sample was mixed after the 81EH07S23 and/or 81EH07S25 QC Samples, .
carryover .isay have occurred .to account for- this value i. .• -. • "
3) 81ZH07S25( Spike QC) - Recovery of OCDF was high' (750 ppq recovered
vs 160 ppq s?Iite3}"~Due to~EKe lack of a Cl3 labelled OCDD standard to
judge the relative response against 2,3,7,8-TCDD-C^, quantitation was,
at best, an estimate. The data was recalled from disc and reverified
at A30 ppq using peak height rather than area.
CONCLUSION:
Due to the imprecise and inaccurate OCDF results discovered by the
three blind audits, any positive OCDF data for water sanples should not
be considered usable. All other dioxin/furan sample data should be
considered of an acceptable level of quality.
-------
TABLE 1. " SELECTED DATA FOR THE POLYCHLORINATED DIBENZOFURAHS AHU
POLYCHLORINATED DIBENZO-P-DIOXINS OF INTEREST
Limit of
• '• • Accurate mass ' Theoretical Isotope Detection
Compounds
Te tr achlorod ib cnzo f uran
Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin
Pcntachlorodibcnzofuran •
Pentachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin
Hexachlorodibenzofuran _' •
Hexachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin
i
Hep tachlorodibcnzof uran
Heptachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin
Octachlorodibenzofuran
Octachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin-
Low Mass
. 303.9016
319.8965
339,8597*
355,8546
' 373,8207*
389.8156
• 407.7817*
• 423.7766*
441.7428
• 457.7377
High Mass
305,8987*
321,8936 .
34118567 '
357.8517
375.8178
391.8127
409.7788
425.7737
443.7398*
459.7347*
Ratio
.77
.77
1.54
1.54
1.23
1.23
1.03
. 1.03
0.88.
0.88
Vfatcr
10 ppq
10 ppq
20 ppq
20 ppq
40 ppq
40 ppq
80 ppq
80 ppq
•100 ppq
100 ppq
Fish
5 ppt
5 ppt
20 ppt
20 ppt
40 ppt
40 ppt
80 ppt
80 ppt
100 ppt
100 ppt
Quantitation Mass
.1.
-------
TABLE 2. IWTERNAL STANDARD RECOVERIES 0?
2>3>7,8-TETPuXatLORODI.BE:s7.0-P-DIOXlN-l3C12 IN WATER
Water Recoveries
Internal Standard
Sample Name Recovery (%)
81EH07S10
81EU07S12
81EH07S22
81EH07S23
81EH07S23
81EH07S24 - .
81EH07S13
81EH07S26
81EH07S39
81EH07S53
81EH07S66
81EH07S38
90
71
81
89
87
94
71
91
83
85
84
83
-------
TABLE 3. BLIND WATER SAMPLE KESULTS
UNITS - ps/1
, t
I 2,3,7,8-TCDO
0
190
4.a-Tcoy
IloporCcdlTruelt Recovery
0
0
0
0
' 25
<3
<3
<5
01 -
X>l -
01 -
01 -
74"
0
0
104
1
.
ol -
i7", ' lil Hi
i
41
01 -
4B
1 65
1" l.i.'i.i-TCUD1
1,5,7,9-TCDD
Reported (True 1 Z Recovery 1 Kepor ccd 1 True
1 0
"'116 '
70
63
5
<3
05
<3
or - i o
260| SB 1 44
100
100
111
0
0
0
g**f *g
"' *<1
6
27**l 32
70
; 63
31
-
-
-
100
-
30
22
2
400
180 1 Ot
60 7SO | 1GO[>4CQ
* - below contract required detection Halt , • .•
»* - reported «< tot*l of 2 isaner»
A - 54-77 P8/1 pentaehlorinAted dtbenzofuraiu «l«o reported
S - 11 pg/1 pentachlorlnated dlbencofurau «lio reported
-------
DOW CHEMICAL USA
MICHIGAN DIVISION — MIDLAND PLANT
NON-CONVENTIONAL/TOXIC POLLUTANTS ~ OUTFALL 031
PERMIT Ml #0000868
TABLE 1
Mon itor ing ResuIts — September, 1984
Phenol
2,4-DIchlorophenoxyacetlc
ac id
Bi s(2-chloroethyI)ether
Chloroform
2,3,7,8-TetrachIoro-
d ibenzo-p-d ioxi n
1 ,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
TetrachIoroethyIene
1,1,2-TrichIoroethane
Pentachlorophenol
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichorobenzene
1,2,4-Tr ichlorobenzene
Methylene Chloride
2-Chlorophenol
2,4-D ichlorophenol
Naphtha Iene
1,1,1-Tr ichIoroethane
Bromoform
Chlorobenzene
Carbon Tetrachloride
2,4,6-Tr ichlorophenol
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
Aery Ion itr iIe
Month 1 y
Average
(Ibs/day)
0.2
.0135*
0.3
4.9
5.6x10~7
0.2
0.1
0.4
8.8 _
0.9
4.1
0.2
Da i ly Month ly
Maximum Average
(Ibs/day) (pg/ liter)
0.2 1
.0165* NDU.6)
0.4 1
5.3 22
6.5x10 3.4 ppq
ND(7.0)
ND(7.0>
ND(11 )
ND(5)
0.2 0.9
0.2 1
0.5 2
11.8 40
NDC0.7)
ND ( 1 )
ND(.3)
ND(6.8)
1.8 ND(7.6)
NDC5.8)
4.2 18
ND(2)
0.2 1
ND(4.2)
Dai ly
Max imum
(ua/l iter)
r
—
2
24
3.7 ppa
—
—
—
—
1
1
2
54
—
—
—
—
—
—
18
—
,1
__
-------
DOW CHEMICAL USA
MICHIGAN DIVISION — MIDLAND
NON-CONVENTIONAL/TOXIC POLLUTANTS -
PERMIT Ml #0000868
TABLE 2
PLANT
- OUTFALL 031
MOP itor ing ResuIts — September, 1984
Concentration
ya/l iter
Phenol ND(1)
2,4-Dich lorophenoxy
acetic acid ND(1 .6)
Bis(2-chloroethyl )ether 2
Chloroform 24
2,3,7,8-Tetrach loro-
d ibenzo-p-d iox in 3.7
1 ,1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 7.0
Tetrachloroethy 1 ene 7.0
1 , 1 ,2-Tr ichloroethane 11
Pentachiorophenol ND(3)
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene 1
1 ,4-Dichorobenzene 1
1 ,2,4-Tr ichlorobenzene 2
Methyl ene Chloride 54
2-Chlorophenol ND(0.8)
2,4-Dichlorophenol ND(1)
Naphthalene ND(.3)
1,1,1-Tr ichloroethane NDC6.8)
Bromoform ND(7.5)
Chlorobenzene NO (5. 8)
Carbon Tetrach lor ide 18
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol ND(2)
1 ,2-D ! ch I orobenzene 1
Aery Ion i tri le ND(4.1)
Sample Concentration
Date uci/l iter
9/04/84
9/04/84
9/04/84
9/04/84
8/21/84
9/04/84
9/04/84
9/04/84
9/04/84
9/04/84
9/04/84
9/04/84
9/04/84
9/04/84
9/04/84
9/04/84
9/04/84
9/04/P4
9/04/84
9/04/84
9/04/84
9/04/84
9/04/84
1
ND ( 1 . 7 )
1
19
3.0
7.0
ND(7.0)
12
ND(6)
0.7
NDC0.5)
2
25
ND(0.6)
ND(1 )
0.4
ND(6.8)
ND(7.7)
NDC5.9)
18
ND(2)
1
4.4
Samp 1 P
Date
9/17/84
" 9/17/84
9/17/84
9/17/84
9/03/84
9/17/84
9/17/84
9/17/84
9/17/84
9/17/84
9/17/84
9/17/84
9/17/84
9/17/84
9/17/84
9/17/84
9/17/84
9/17/84
9/17/84
9/17/84
9/17/84
9/17/84
9/17/84
ND = Not Detected
() = Lowest Detection Lfmit
-------
•*DOH CHEMICAL COMPANY
MIDLAND DIV
MlOLAND
.illL-.J^lu'sMM 11;., 12^jj|IWJ8MQ(BMii9fiWi!ili!iJ''~ iMHiuM.ij^uw>rUi^uu-uJUJvaeuuiiw^aiiuuwu .- . ><-.
. •. *'it i
02
Y
- I
(AtHIH NUMlliT~j I FlHMll NUMUlftI ft'.TIAU NUMUt H I
56000-) I bjlOOOQDbsJ L56013.8,_J
MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT FOR
1ms is Ytmn MONTHLY lUroiu f OI\IA ion
SEE ncvtnsE SIDE FOR RETURN MAIL
Picnic cumplcu* anci lulmul ivvo copies ol this foim
* I iliv end ol tad) monih This ICIKHI inusl iLich our
Laming office uy ihc tOlh ol Ilic rnonlh.
PAHT 1 - nETURN TO DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
* ««JO •-. t II
41)1 tl'jD
DOH CHEMICAL COMPANY
.OUTFALL' I 031
PflOC.KASTES'TO TITTABAHASSEE. R, 031
•PERMIT
10/79
Dale loim was
punted
z
o
o '.
tu -
10
Ar,
Mt
' 1 b
11 1
It
4
J
)
1
i
'. I
OOgJl
TEMP-HATER
, ._ I
i IDAIIYAVG
C ~?l
C 71
C" C f
( C.V
( (,<•
C <--r
( | <.s
C J Ct
- J
HIGH
71
7t
70
^
P-7
7o
U-
LOW
coi;:
i
i
1
!
D*
00095
UCTIVITf
iiniihQ/ciu 1 ah
LY AVG
T3ci
7H"
1 6•*-
CL «.* « - , f-
( 1 c*
c j c s
'( i 47
c i (r~?
f | /?
c |, vs
r | -71
rl "r1
r | 7H
Vs-
?~¥
7T
Cr%
/$
7V
"7~7~
7ld
rj_ /) jj-7^
r | -?>
ri_ ^H
r i -7M
f I "71/
( J "7 J
"?1
77
77
•?t
7V
1 1
1
1 1
' j
C^ll
7i?C
~7
V
1
1 1
"""". i_L.i.a._,.jti1
, t-4.
'*-llJ" i-U-L_i. i_i2ir
i -i i_i_ i_j ..i
i .i i i i. i i
I'XBIH OArs HII-.JHIIHC, _|3j|
UlAl SAM I ES TACE N j C
A 1 I XCl 1 LJIIJG I.'.AX||.HIM|
'- <-^Jt. VKH
..,, ""- f.i
I t,,
w
• y
* u u
r T
•
i
-VI f
•AX
HIGH
LOW
w*»
>*.:W
g, jc-
1
~7Ci5
| 1 4C-J
AC:
I/."U
1_1 -L
_l J 1
1
1
-iTj.^.^
- L J .I.J .1 1 . l._
- 1 I A
j i..
. .
.UMBE* -AYi (Itl ORIINU ll .O
VC
-!_-!
(Dll.U I-AJK
J L
°l 1 1 1 J 1
1
1
1
1
1
Amnonia - Nitroaen
mn/1 Net
DAILY AVG
i.S
1.1
.6
1.1
1
HIGH
(•-
i
1 0.1
'1 '
1
1
1
= .J
. 0.0
I.H
_J
1
l
1
Uf
P.fc
VEHAGE
A/lf,',UM
U'.'BfH D
DIAL SAW
AYS
EXCE
LOW
C..W
/
\
1 I ( 1 1 '
1 1 J 1 I2
1 ' *
-J_.J.J
^TS Biros
I*LES TAKE
L.-1-
J_l
'^-r
EOirJG MAXIMUI^l
- '"• y'°i rr
! ui- n/',L>t n tn &vr fv'iCH
Unlltf UMUtH I1NAL1Y Ul IAV/ IHAT iTj
THAT n/.bi.u on MIT I/JQUIHY of TIIOLC KK
Cl».1=lCrt 1 AM AWAflE THAT T«f/l£ AHE S/C
m?
J I..
1 1
AVL J'LHSON/
JIVlOUAIi IMN
i\fiiMy/y(»>
Solids - Dissolved
kn/dav . Net
i
C
r
r
r
r
r
c
c
r
r
c
(
r
c
C
U
r
c
DAILY AVG.
HOI is^
HOI M€
317 e-f^
51*} 3"if<
M-7l ,1 t(e
_J L
1 I
UMBE« RAYS flEfOHIIMG
OIAL SAMfLLS TAKEN |
xll'*.
J I
til'
, ,C
AYS EXCEEDING MAXtMUt^ ( ,
VC MAX. VtOi. \ |
ILY tXA
1EDIA7EL
\LJllS/t
f t'lJHCIt
MTNL~D A
) IIESI'O
'0 SUHW
in tn
NO AM
VSIBIE
n'"9l
J.-J.
River Flow
T"
i
c
f
r
r
r~
c
C
C
r
C
C
C
C
(
c
c
r
DAILY AVG
**U
H<,«»
ei^
iiec
•
7'S
H7I
fell
53o
-«(S
7'<(
«.77
61?
fc 3c
ic.j«
"trt
HIGH
^St |
7H3
f | 723
f
c
-(
c
c
0
<
r
P
r
r
C
71/
7iO
3~>l
—1J*^
3V7
273
Joy
37f
^CvC
MAX. V
Ul
°!.-Ll 1 _LJ_1.
(-AMILIAU WUH hll. MIUHMAIIUN I
FOI1 OUlAINirJU llll IIJtOril/AIION.
FALSE INFOHMADO/^. IfJClULiING !ME
River 'Available Cap'
kq/day
i
DAILY AVG
6"J2,o,c
I-L"1
1 i
t i
tntf PIIHCH
-------
sL.i«&)iteiMtfatjtii!ii^ •• '•••<•'•;•
V
'"DDK CHEt'.ICAL
KJDLAiiO OIV
If
lAM
Ml
us
-in
\T£
I
2
3
4
s
6
7
S
9
10
11
12
1J
14
15
16
17
IB
19
20
23
24
if~
16
27
?8
29
30
31
^Hi IT
.MAH T
UlC. 0
"""' ""1
560J01_J
iUjflUitfjifttHUfliirui
conpAiir
r.i 0135_
... 5CP5P
FLOH CONDUIT
MOD
1 DAILY AVG
( 55.7
3C..I
f. _:K'i!;
C" ?•! i
«rj at.'/
C 1 2C..7
q il-.|.
f 27. tf
C 27. g
c a»y.5
<- i >. t
r Tf i
?--&-
afii
( T>.«i
c '•?. 2
( l
C co
r ,"5^"
<:L.3t-0
'.VI.ACC t_j
l._J
E
.. . L L.
"UMII H bATU 111 1X1
!'*>! UCUI'INU
liAU
•It
HIGH
1-
1
_l
1 _J
L_J
1 1 ^
EN
fc'AXlk
M
M
~jj
L 1
_J_
G
]"
UM|
.1
2ic
6 c
LOW
i i
1
r *
Itiitr-tilP "•""•'
3
D
J3031J1
DOD-5
ii r /I . rVct
1
I
1
1
1
1
T
MA*
D<'LY AVG
0.0
0.0
o.o
2.1
H.O
I.M
1-1
M.O
"!£i.L_i__i_i
"•'-'u I i ,
HIGH
_^ j
J i'
j l__l .L-U
LOW
1- I8
LUJ°
_ - . i_-L -L.I 1 J_|.-J -
IO1AL ^-V.PlES 1AHIN [ ( ( jO
JAYS t>:HDINC MAXtMul^ | |
Uur 1 u'l* M 111 •»!
1 CiSIUY UIJUIH HIJALTY
1HA". BASED ON MY triOU
rOM'lFTF 1 CM AWiRF TH
0
i
c
c
c
c
c
r
c
c
c
C
f
C
c
c
C'
T"
c
r
r
C'
r
c
c
"d
00313
H DEHAN-TOT
1G/L' " "
Y AVG
:>f
=5
IS
id
^
si
VI
83
iV
7o
7f
7C
rS
ii
7S
' ,07
107
1 IO
(0$
RAGE , ,
.IAAIMUM
i l .-
HIGH LOW
l
1
-TT
HUM lin DAYS RETOHIING LT |7
IOTAL SAMPLES 1AKEH j ( jC
OArS EXCIEOIHC MAXIMUM[ | j_
jf LAW THAT YHA"VE"YIM"!>ON
IIY OF (HOSE IftfJlVlDUAl S,ll^
£>T IHFRF ARFJatGNlFIC/X'/Vf'''
70500
SQLIDS-DIS5-160C'
' HG/L'1 '
i
i
1
l
l
T"
1
1
i
i
i
AVE
MA)
DAILY AVG
H'JHI
H
H*-
H'
RAGC
IMUM
rer"
^^0
— ! — L
i 1
_
HIGH
LOW
^*J5« V
— f—
5"aT,l
'il^l5.
_L_J 1- i 1-
1 l 1 1 1
IVUMUtH OAYS ntfOMTING jl jC
1O1AL SAMPIISIAKCH j ,1^
DAVS CXCUOINC MAXIMU'.^ | |
AV& MA« VIOl 1 i , i | j
ALLY" EXAMINE!) AND~AM TAM
MEDIATELY (ItSPONSIUlE fOfl
AL7IES fOJ^SUBMHTING ^ALLL-
4 / U JU
.SOLID5-SU5-NET
•' HG/L' ' '
A^
k.3
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
1
i
i
AVE
MA)
/ERAGEI 1
DAILY AVG
O-O
0,0
•3.7
7.3
1
IKIUM . j
-.1 1 J
i i
riUMIIEM DAY!, fUrO!
IO1AL SAtAPltS TA»-
UXII
HIGH
L J I?
I2IC
--J-.i.
-J_l_
IUH
LOW
*J- I2
> ?
J_-L_
-I-J
J'i|
A
AVC MAX V.W. J | i 1 i 1
l»tll' I-UNCM 11* •»!
UAH Wllll lilt MIOIIMAIION
JUIAINItJG 1HE IIJIOHMA1ION.
IMFOMMAIIOM. IUCLUUING THE
•SOLlDS-SUS-NETflD
LBS/DAy
A\
C
i
1
i
AVE
MA>
fERAGE' 1
»&-30
DAILY AVG
O
O
nn
4 '.7
RACE . i
IMUM i i
_..,! 1
'.AXif
9 '3"
HIGH
i lit:
L_1_J-
i i
NUMaiR OATS llEt'OHIING
IOTAL SAMPLES TAKEN
:''
^:r
6.7"
7.c
i i i i i j i
WUMBIR OATS HITOHIING l-*|r'
10IAI SALinlSlAklN 1 j ,C
\tuf ruNCH (iv 1*1
AND AIL AIIAUIMINP.. A'JO
IlON IS IIIUE. ACCUHAIE. AND
HSONMENT.
w ° ,| SECTION 1 I
20
2
c
f
I
25 u
30
-------
<
'OH CHEMICAL COMPANY
UDUUD DIV
IDLAND
OOB6Bj IJ.6013B
MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT FOR
THIS IS YOUII MONTHLY REPOnT fOIIM fOfl
SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR RETURN MAIL
Please comjilcie and julwnii two copies ol ihn lorm
dl ihu1 end ol cdctk month Ttm report muil rudch our
Lansing uflicc by :
I
?
OLIFOR
16
rt-
li>
DAILY AVG
O
O
—
— -
i7
-- •
<->
lb>
FECA
OML-.
MAX I
HIGH
*f"
J
l
.
_
L'
HUM
tow
L
—
i
I
1
~;
i
C
S i*Cf 1 DtNO MAXIMUI.J j j^
fV'P PUNCH
<» in
1
—
DAILY AVG
HIGH
'
1
1
—
1
1
1
LOW
1 '— ' • -
1
1
1
AVERAGE
1AX
MUM
1 | | 1 1 1 1
1 | 1 1 l
1 1
i i
J. J-.
J 1
1 J
uwfaER OATS tUfORTirvG [ ,
OTAL LAt/l'Lt5 TAM.M 1.
AYS, ELUDING MAXIMUM]
D
1 (ll.lllr' Ufjl.lH I'l fJAt IV Of 1 AW
IM',1 HA', i \t uu M f n< ji MMr1 m h
LO'.'illlU 1 AM AWAIIL IHAI IHIIIL
a_i._
08SERVATION 'VISULi
_^ 0 '70 '«
MAXIMUM
0 '
i
i
i
l
\
\
i
i
i
i
i
DAILY AVG
O
0
C
0
t/
c
c
D
C
c
1 C
1 O
\ e
i
fc
-
HIGH
LOW
f
1
i t
1 c
\
c
1 D
1
1
l
c |
t
o
1 C
1
c
1 fc
1 t
.
1
1
I
t
o
&
c
c
c
AVCItAGC , ! ||
'.AXIMUM , ,
1 II
UMUEft DAYS HEPOH
I P
..I. 1- Jto
iTiirHffv
OlAL SAMI'I tS TAM N |
AYS EXCLECHNG MAXIMUh^
. ... 1-
VG MA« VIM. 1 i , ±
_L J_
DUP PUNCH 174 ttl
-
1
].-
DAILY AVG
-
WLHAbE
(MUM
HIGH
LOW
1
1 1 1 1 1 1
1- 1 1
1 1 1
1 1-
L L
1 I I. J I I
1 .1
L.J
I J
AY
Vt.
j l>riUMN(, MAXIMUr,^
»*.« V
01 _ 1 . j _a . i
1J-
QUP PUNCH i'*" »n
Cons timers Power
Intake cfs
i
t
c
c
I
(
{
c
c
c
t
C
C
c
t
c
(
c
c
c
c
C
c
c
c
t
r
3
c
AVI
*AX
DAILY AVG
O
C
O
fc
O
o
c
0
o
o
D
O
O
fc
fc
D
P
c.
C
c
0
"
C
Ci
P
o
0
o
0 .
f
c/
RAGf ! t
l_J L
HIGH
,
LOW
_l 1
1 1
1 I J L.L_1 J
UMOiR DAYS HtPOKIING jj. |
01AI LAMI'US TAHtH 1 J |
AYS IXCC^)INO MAXIMUM I .
our PUNCH m ••*
Consumers Power
Slowdown cfs
i
I'
t
f
C
c
c
f
t
c
I
f
r
C
c
c
c
(
c
DAILY AVG
o
C
C
C
c
c,
<.
t
o
c
o
c.
r
e.
c
c
C
f
cl c
t| c
I
L
T
i
c
L
c
f
i.i
AVI
1AX
C
c
c-
c
c^
c
c
d
f
t Illl OHMAI IUN IIK.IllbllJb NIL I'UtMIIII 1 1 y I, I hill An 1 iMnu'.OIIMI II 1
O
p-
O
-------
DOW CHEMICAL USA
MICHIGAN DIVISION -- MIDLAND PLANT
NON-CONVENTIONAL/TOXIC POLLUTANTS - OUTFALL 031
PERMIT #MI 0000868
TABLE 1
Monitoring Results -- August, 1984
Phenol
2,4-Dichl orophenoxyacetic
acid
Bis(2-chloroethyl )ether
Chi oroform
2,3,7,8-Tetrachloro-
dibenzo-p-dioxin
1,1,2,2-Tetrachl oroethane
Tetrachloroethyl ene
1,1,2-Trichl oroethane
Pentachlorophenol
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichorobenzene
1,2,4-Tn'chlorobenzene
Methyl ene Chloride
2-Chlorophenol
2,4-Dichl orophenol
Naphthalene
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Bromoform
Chiorobenzene
Carbon Tetrachloride
2,4,6-Trichl orophenol
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
Acryl onitnl e
Monthly Daily
Average Maximum
Obs/day) (Ibs/day)
0.2 0.4
.0018* .0029*
0.2 0.4
3.0 3.6
1.9xlO"7 3.8xlO'7
.05 .1
.1 .3
-2 .4
2.6 3.6
1.8 3.6
2.1 2.7
0.1 0.3
Month! y
Average
(ug/i)
2
3
3
32
4.5 ppq
ND(6.8)
N0(6.8)
ND(8.7)
ND(7)
1
2
3
25
ND(0.5)
ND(1)
ND(.2)
ND(6.9)
14
ND(5.7)
9
ND(2)
2
ND(4.2)
Daily
Maximum
(ug/i)
3
3
3
44
5.9 ppq
—
--
—
--
1
2
3
30
—
--
--
--
20
--
15
--
2
_ _
-------
DOW CHEMICAL USA
MICHIGAN DIVISION -- MIDLAND PLANT
NON-CONVENTIONAL/TOXIC POLLUTANTS -- OUTFALL 031
PERMIT #MI 0000868
TABLE 2
Phenol
2,4-Dichlorophenoxy
acetic acid
Bis(2-chloroethyl )ether
Chloroform
2,3,7,8-Tetrachloro-
dibenzo-p-dioxin
Moni
Concentration
ug/1 iter
1
3
2
20
5.9 ppq
1,1,2,2-Tetrachl oroethane ND(6.5)
Tetrachl oroethyl ene
1,1,2-Tric hi oroethane
Pentachlorophenol
1 ,3-Dichl orobenzene
1 ,4-Dichorobenzene
1 ,2,4-Trichl orobenzene
Methyl ene Chi oride
2-Chl orophenol
2,4-Dichlorophenol
Naphthal ene
1 ,1,1 -Trie hi oroethane
Bromoform
Chi orobenzene
Carbon Tetrachl oride
2,4,6-Tric hi orophenol
1 ,2 -Die hi orobenzene
Acryl oni tn'l e
ND(6.6)
N0(9.3)
ND(7)
1
1
3
20
'ND(O.S)
ND(1)
ND(0.2)
ND(7)
20
ND(5.8)
ND(7.1)
ND(2)
1
ND(3.9)
toring Resul
Sampl e
Date
7/23/84
7/23/84
7/23/84
7/25/84
7/23/84
7/25/84
7/25/84
7/25/84
7/23/84
7/23/84
7/23/84
7/23/84
7/25/84
7/23/84
7/23/84
7/23/84
7/25/84
7/25/84
7/25/84
7/25/84
7/23/84
7/23/84
7/25/34
ts -- August,
Concentration
yg/l iter
3
2
3
44
3.1 ppq
ND(7.1)
ND(7.0)
ND(8.1)
N0(6)
1
2
3
30
ND(0.6)
ND(1)
ND(0.2)
ND(6.7)
ND(9.1)
ND(5.6)
15
ND(1)
2
NO (4. 5)
1984
Sampl e
Date
8/06/34
8/06/84
8/06/84
8/13/84
8/06/84
8/13/84
8/13/84
8/13/84
8/06/84
8/06/84
8/06/84
8/06/84
8/13/84
8/06/84
8/06/84
8/06/84
8/13/84
8/13/84
8/13/84
8/13/84
8/06/84
8/06/84
8/12/34
ND = Not Detected
-------
jiif
i iii
®
[IMMirft Jti'iiiLli
• •DOH CHEMICAL COHPAHY
MIDLAND OIV
HI ['LAND
• I 110640
MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT FOR
1IIIS IS VOUII MUMIMLV 111 I'UIU I OHM I OK
sit luvuiu SIDC f on nnuiiN MAIL
Picnic cuiniilclc "'ill luliinil l"0 cui'it* ol Urn loon
.1 llu end ol Kill jnbnlh Tliiill|iuilmu»lK»thuul
DCJH CHEMICAL COMPANY
OUlfALL I Oil „ ,,.
PROC,WASTES'TO T I TTABAHASSEE.R. 01J
I
i
('• '.
1
1
<" !
j
i
i
i
(~N |
i
i
• t ' '
i
i
' i
c" \
0
A" 1
'c
O
c
.0
c • i
I
c i
I
I
O I
I
I
2
L56000oo*8j
HATER
f
DAILY AVG
-70
•cc
=JF
-77
77
-77
HIGH
71
" 63"
1 "7<,
T^'
] t*i
P"!"
-11-
|7<<
fc*
n 7%
*" J
AVlHACi | , v
MAl.MUM , ,
101
UAT
OA
• It
nth t>
Al 1*.
11
l l
-j..i
•VS HI
't(S I
IDi/.G
77
1 L_J_
l_i_l_
f\j«TinG
•^7T
M*!!^! — ^
O ') 2,
0,t |1|^
LOW
—
L_
J_ 1-
1
lii:
D H
-ib
coi;:u
1
1
t
1
~l
I
(
-
D* L
V
i
-?
<—?
-)
— «
.
tIACt
IML.V
*ll MUMHIA 1
oiwJ
CTIVI
1C8-C
Y AVG
L-
1,
il "!L liij
NUM»m DAYS HtPOHIING |_ jt
OAYS IACUOINC. MA«IMUW[ | ^
» ((, M»» V*. ! ) J t 1 1
uur'uMM in ni
in TAW~ IH'AI I'HAVI I'lii'.ni
IIV Ol IIIO'.I imillillllAlii Ik
Al IHLIIl AIII l,lt.hJl(ANI VU
T It 1^,. / /
1
T
c
c
r
c
f
r"
r
T
C
r
r
r
T
r
r
f
T
c
r
c
(
C
AV
MA
—
OAILY AVG
liS711
allot fi
' ft 'ill
t T
7T
"""V'*
(IMUM
(JUMUkN 0
IU(AV iV
• vfc M*K K
t'
Al 1 T 1 J^/1
Wi
2^i*T
3^TV
:S-!
ITS Afro
fltS 1A*
COiliC *'
'V1,',
r in -f
*'
HIGH
LOW
1
L
1 . I 1 i
AN(l AM fAM
'N'.ItU t 1 CM
V1H IK JO i Mi,
r>\\
t» i
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
C
f
f
C
r
c
('
__
r
r
r
-f
c
r
r
r
AV
MA
OAILY AVC
Stl
10lf
•yl f
T7t
•/SI
"HC.1
^S
Q'/S
-7J1
=^^
C
5
i
<.
HACC
XiMUM
vt
It
11
171
O'l
_l I
_! — I
-lU'lttH OAYJ Kl
IOIAI (AMCIfS
UAY5 MLUOINC
>vt. MAA VIUL
OUf fu'
IIAl'l Wllll III
t>li Aiuirji, in
INIOIlMAllON
_
_
L-
?o
A>
M
CH
r
L
I
HIGH
I. I—I
NT INC
gi|
1 L.I
in ••
fllOMf/
NCI UO
LOW
~7~5
J — L-
Jit
AlK'N
MlU'l.
NO lilL
Ddte lu'm WAS
pnnied
v« ~I
^TuvJ
A¥"ui V^^ ~~r^2—-
—
AV
MA
QAIkY AVC
1ACI j
i_
^|GH
r ' '
.I—I— I
l.uMltH OAVS «tK>«rif.C
DAYS ( ACI tOtr,« fc'AMIMUkj
•vs. fc«»* VO* | | j
M/OMI1 II ^ '" 'M|S ('
i t»nu vt iii'^t tta
COi-MUtMIV Of INC
LOW
CU'MI NI
1
3AILY AVG
VtKACI
-O_l_
HIGH
1
o_i_of
LOW
—
1-
1_L_L I^-L-I
OIAllA.^.^HA.1^ J j I
AllC/AII AII*lnMINIj "'
HIM li IMUl »' ' HIIAII All
c.
is
JO
-------
•'?> ,
till
i,W \.'&H\ jl?fit
•;;•"•;!}• L:f ;i!i f. .{liikin
r1-.
"
• UJ
r
• ,:
r-
o
-'4
o
o
= c
;c
• n
c
o
• «DO« CMEC.ICAL COMPANY
hJDUllO t>lV
MIDLAND •".: 10610
MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT FOR
mis is YOUM MuiiiiiiY iniorn f OIIM inn
sec iicviiisc siui run
MAIL
I'kjic ciini|.li.lf .""I ml «'" E''l»« ol ''"> lo'm
.1 Ihc i-nJ i.l Ljch niunlh 1 l.n 'H'u'l mull u.chouf
LimvHiij olltct l*y tlic lOlh ul Ilil nionlh
02
DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY
OUIfALL I 031
KIOC.V.ASIEE 10 TUTABAWASSEE R. Oil
EXPIRATIOHJ 10/79
DJIC loim W4
LJ
PAH
NAf
LIM
DA
2
3
4
S
6
7
1
9
1C
11
i;
i]
is
le
L56PJ04 1 LHI
AM
At
IS
IT
[E
~~1
17
11
19
JO
'/- 21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
)a
31
MONTHLY
1UMMAMV
• ICINNm
OOO.O.B69J L560138_J PART 1 - RETURN TO DECT OF NA1URAL RESOURCES
5CP50. . _
FLOW CONDUIT
H'
f
(
(
f
r
TL
<
r
ri
r
f
r
rl
<•
<• 1
c
c
( 1
r
r
<•
r
r
r
(
(
<
IOIA
Hl>U
JAIIY AVG
17.1
n.J
n.t
~T. 1
l.t
o.c
t.i
13. c •
7-1
o.c
21.5
1.1
O.C
ij
HI'
K f »
DOD-S
nr » .
I
1
1
1
i
1
1
1
MA
0' LY AVG
1.7
3.1"
M-l
»•". 1 1
1 .1
_. .,1 . 1-i-.-
HlGH
•~£
1 -L-
»_1_L
l.l.-l
LOW
. t-
l-l2
I,-,/
1 1
ICHAl UMPltl tAKtM j ^ j%
~ 1 LlilllY UNhl t( I'INAllY
TMA- UAbl D ON IM INQU
COI."UT£ A.M AWAHC IK
OXYGEN DEMAN-TOT
" Mfi/l i
i
C
c
C
(
c
I
v>
Y IXAMlNIII ANIi AM 1AM
MAHLY III SI'ON^lllfJE (OH
, (Oil UUIir.lUIj/IC l/l1-'
3jy-i
SOLJDS-SUS^NET
AV
3
i
i
i
AV
MA
Nu
ERAGEI f
i
DAILY AVG
•z
DACE
XIMUM
AtHH 0
1-1
c.c
O.O
D. C)
__!_!
_1_
^Yl Ri
IOTAI SAMPtCl T
UAVS tXCIIOINC
~. ~u., V101
PO
AH
M
AXlt
5 '
HIGH
J 1 ' l"
1_1 1
IN |
un
LOW
'/"'**
Jl'l^
£l
"° MAA V« 1 1 1 1 1 _1_
DUP PUNCH III Ml
IIAh"wilH llll INKIIIMAllON
UUIAINIfJG Ml INIOIIMAMON
INIOIIMAIION. INClUUlNG llll
pnnlcd
• fl / 0 3 1
30LIOS-SUS-NET»0
AV
1.
i
AV
MA
l.u
tKAllt lr
DAILY AVG
O
c5
0
O
o
flACI , |
X.MUM , ,
I— l-
_ . -L. L
t«IM OAY1 HI PO
AA.r
HIGH
1 I
I 1
I— l-i.
AliNC
UAYl KlllO.nC MA.IMUtj
DuP PU..CH I'l »
UUI»/1MIK< IN llll!. 01
1 UllltVl IIIAI UK II
PO^SlbllHY OF fINE A
un
LOW
I 1..
i i
CNVIN
ND IMI
L61/'0/2? 1
ooioo
PH
0 TO 1
9
i
C
r
r
r
r
f
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
c
T
AV
MA
M
KW
JA
• V
DAILY AVG
"^n
5Ti
1 ZT^
*?. i
X.k'UM
IN
MB(K 0
£-•3"
cf. 1
e.v
«. 7
S^ -*7
. "
n
lit in
firGH
«?. H
•""J.l"
~7Tc~
"TTT
•r. i
1 o
HI INC
".~1
",ir«v«".-uJ
UM
lOv/
=f^T
TT7
7. fc
Ti
sTJ
tr
i I4-
AUK All" AIIAI.lllAlf.il A .I/
llON li l"Ul *rUJMAIl »'•»
IliiOI.Ml"'
-------
•DON CHEMICAL COMPANY
MIDLAND DIV
MIDLAND :'I 486<|0
IACKITY NUMIfA
[560004 ._
|P(KMiT NUM8EH I j'J.*»*U NuMBta
I (110000868 J LS60136
MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT FOR
THIS IS YOUR MONTHLY RtfonT FORM FOR
SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR RETURN MAIL
Please complete and iulimit two copits ol this loim
al (he end ol each month. Tim report must reach our
Lansing office by the lOlh of the month.
PART 1 - RETURN TO DEFT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
02
* 4470 "'• • » ""•
4113 ••10
DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY
OUTFALL I 031
PROC.HASTES TO TITTABAHASSEE' R. 031
PERMIT EXPIRATION} JO/79
Dale form was
punted
A IV
-1C
IS
IT
TE
-
COL
1
1
[FO
bf/
?.!«
*M-
'.13
DAILY AVG
'/ V
1 i
-
lb
FEC/
OML1
MAX I
i)00
HIGH
1"
MUM
LOW
' .3
( O
i
1
1
1
k
T
0
A
tVEHAGf
AAIlUUU
\7
1
11 i i i i5
i
i
£j Aj
t r ,1
i i
ill i
DIAL SAMPLES TAKEN
ATS
S"Cl
[Qif.C
V& MAX viOi.
<"«C OAIE
. OAIE
MAXIMUM
,5
J._ 1 I
LJJ
L^O.
r.t
M M 0 0 V V
^
i
-
01 LY AVG
]
I
!
i
J
Vf
»AGE '
HIGH
LOW
l
1
1
i 1
1 i
AXIMUW | III
' t
1 1
|
1 1
OTAL SAMPLES TAKEN
AYS EXCICDlNG MAXIMUM
*G
MA* \'OL
1
1
OJP PUNCH 17* Ml
~
1
DAILY AVG
HIGH
VEflAGE
AXIMUM
1
1
1
1
LOW
t (
1 1
1 1
1
UMSER DAYS REPORTING
OTAL SAMPLES TAKEN
AYS EXCEEDING MAXIMUM
C M»» V
OL
l
1 1
OUP PUNCH 1" Ml
1 CEKHFY UNDER PENALTY OF LAW THAT
THAT. BASED ON Mr INQUIRY OF THOSE
COMPLETE AM AWARE THAT THEME ARE
OSSERVATION .VISULi
-.O'TO-iT ""
MAXIMUM
0 "
t
i
i
,
i
,
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
,
,
i
i
i
i
i
t
i
i
,
i
\
i
i
i
J_
DAILY AVG. HIGH
c
o
o
u
£.
Cj
c.
f
(•'
/I
c,
(1
ri
, .
,
(
f
C,
0
0
(1
VERAGE
AXIMUM
LOW
f
1 1 1 1 !<-"
1 1 1 1
1 1 1
1 1 ' 1 1
UM9ER DAYS REPORTING [')
OTAL SAMPLES TAKEN
AYS EXCEEDING MAXIMUM
, J 1
o
VC MAX VIOL ( , |
OUP PUNCH i" MI
-
1
DAILY AVG HIGH
VERAGE
AXIMUM
1
i
1
1
LOW
1 1
l 1
l l 1
1 1 1
UMBER DAYS REPORTING j
OTAL SAMPLES TAKEN .
AYS EXCEEDING MAXIMUM
VC MAX VIOL
1 I , i
DUP PUNCH III Ml
Consumers Power
Intake cfs
. .. -
i
DAILY AVG
C'
(>
0
0
0
0
c
' I
o
t.
0
a
f-
f,
f,
,)
(,
u
f,
n
1 1
0
0.
0
VERAGE ,
AXIMUM ,
1
1
HIGH
i
LOW
1 1 1 1 111
1 II 1
1 1 1 1 1
UMtER DAYS REPORTING
OTAL SAMPLES TAKEN
AYS EXCEEDING MAXIMUM •
VG MAX VIOl
"? ll
v\\ 1
l
1 1 1 I
OUP PUNCH O* Ml
Consumers Power
Slowdown cfs
i
,
DAILY AVG
,,
CJ
(,
c
<
0
C-
0
u
c.
0
_c_
n
,
Q_
0
a
u
o
o
o
C-'
o
r>
0
O
0
VERAGE ,
AXIMUM |
1
1
HIGH
1 1
l
1 1
i l
LOW
. H
. 1 1
- 1
UMIER DAYS REPORTING
OTAL SAMPLES TAKEN
AYS EXCEEDING MAXIMUM
VC MAJI VIOL
l 1
OUP PUNCH 1)1-1
1 1
•Sil
!•?! /
1
1 1
•1
5
10
IS
20
s
0
1 HAVE PERSONALLY EXAMINED AND AM FAMILIAR WITH THE INFORMATION SUBMITTED IN THIS DOCUMENT AND ALL ATTACHMENTS AND
INDIVIDUALS IMMEDIATELY RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING THE INFORMATION. 1 BELIEVE THAT THE INFORMATION IS TRUE. ACCURATE. ANO
SIGNIFICANT PENALTIES FOR SUBMITNNG FALSS-, INFORMATION. INCLUDING THE POSSIBILITY OF FINE AND IMPRISONMENT.
-,f., vnnuir c- A"" T/Ste* CERTIFICATION NUMBER WflOlPfli
r •<-
C
z'
o
C
r L r
o
-------
DOW CHEMICAL USA
MICHIGAN DIVISION — MIDLAND PLANT
NON-CONVENTIONAL/TOXIC POLLUTANTS — OUTFALL 031
PERMIT #MI 0000868
TABLE 2
Monitoring Results - July, 1985
Phenol
2,4-Dichlorophenoxy-
acetic acid
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
Chloroform
2,3,7,8-Tetrachloro-
dibenzo-p-dioxin
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethylene
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Pentachlorophenol
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichorobenzene
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Methylene Chloride
2-Chlorophenol
2,4-Dichlorophenol
Naphthalene
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Bromoform
Chlorobenzene
Carbon Tetrachloride
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
Acrylonitrile
Concentration
ug/liter
2
5
2
8
33 ppq*
3
4
NDC0.8)
ND(2)
1
2
3
ND(6)
ND(0.6)
2
-0.3
5
1
2
1
ND(2)
3
ND(1)
Sample Concentration Sample
Date Mg/liter Date
6/24/85
6/24/85
6/24/85
6/24/85
6/24/85
6/24/85
6/24/85
6/24/85
6/24/85
6/24/85
6/24/85
6/24/85
6/24/85
6/24/85
6/24/85
6/24/85
6/24/85
6/24/85
6/24/85
6/24/85
6/24/85
6/24/85
6/24/85
4
18
2
10
31 ppq*
ND(6)
6
ND(5)
ND(2)
0.9
2
2
7
ND(0.7)
4
0.3
ND(7)
ND(6)
ND(3)
ND(5)
ND(2)
4
3
7/08/85
7/08/85
7/08/85
7/08/85
7/10/85
7/08/85
7/08/85
7/08/85.
7/08/85
7/08/85
7/08/85
7/08/85
7/08/85
7/08/85
7/08/85
7/08/85
7/08/85
7/08/85
7/08/85
7/08/85
7/08/85
7/08/85
7/08/85
ND = Not Detected
() = Lowest Detection Limit
»
= Concentration Reported as Part Per Quadrillion
-------
DOW CHEMICAL USA
MICHIGAN DIVISION — MIDLAND PLANT
NON-CONVENTIONAL/TOXIC POLLUTANTS — OUTFALL 031
PERMIT #MI 0000868
TABLE 1
Monitoring Results - July, 1985
Phenol
2, 1-Dichlorophenoxyacetic
acid
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
Chloroform
2,3,7,8-Tetrachloro-
dibenzo-p-dioxin
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethylene
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Pentachlorophenol
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,1-Dichorobenzene
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Methylene Chloride
2-Chlorophenol
2,U-Dichlorophenol
Naphthalene
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Bromoform
Chlorobenzene
Carbon Tetrachloride
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
Acrylonitrile
Monthly Daily
Average Maximum
(Ibs/day) (Ibs/day)
.5 .7
.016* .027*
.3 .3
1.5 1.7
2.7x10~6 5.3x10~6
.8 1.0
.8 1.0
—
— —
.2 .2
.3 .3
.1 .5
1.2
—
.5 .7
.05 .05
.8
.2
.3
.2
—
.6 .7
.5
Monthly Daily
Average Maximum
(ug/D (ug/D
3
12
2
9
32 ppq
5
5
MD(3)
ND(2)
1
2
3
ND(6)
ND(0.6)
3
0.3
ND(7)
ND(6)
ND(3)
ND(5)
ND(2)
4
ND(1)
U
18
2
10
33 ppq
6
6
ND(5)
ND(2)
1
2
3
7
ND(.7)
H
0.3
5
1
2
1
ND(2)
4
3
Mass discharge measured at 031a
-------
•00* CHEMICAL COIiPAKT
KJDLAND OIV
U06flO
(TACIKT* MJM«l* j frT»*MH NUMUi* I i i* 1»*U »«UMhl»
I 5t>diOH I LMIDOO.O_86»J L54D13e_
._J
MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT FOR
7H(S IS YOU»I MOUIXLY nfCOIll /OHM/OH
SEE /irvtMSI SIDE f OH ntlOHW MAIL
Plutr cumj'U'lc .imi lulmul Ivvu COf»cv ut (hit tiirm
.1 ilic tnd t'l trfth monlh Tlnv upon otuil fucli oui
L.//ning oMiif by l»»c JOlll ul tt>i month,
PART 1 - RETURN TO DEFT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
Jv.l-1
111 •;
02
.00 ».. t 11
%> **••(•
OOH CHEMICAL
OUTFALL I 031
PROC.KASTES'TO TIITAOAHASSEE-R. Oil
PERMIT EXPIRATION!
10/79
Dale loirn w»
pfuMcd
H <
\M
IS
a
'E
--
.
FLOW
1
k-
_5
CO
MGO
L2
NO
DAILY AVG
, j
I/ 1
'1.1 7
< (.
t' .-
(
^ 1
" "J
( ^
\ I.
:-
.
H
,
,
I
i
c
>(
| [
,' 1
l '
1 l
50
UIT
HIGH
i v
^
i
I
f
. I.I
• I I
H
) I
^ \
4}
/.
-i
_i
r V
\ 1
^
: •<
y
n P
-V
t _[
-."•
AVI
AOI
>A..,UUM
,u^
*C
II
... ;
_1_JL I-l_i_
- L. i, 1 .1 L
"301 I
3 f
»AC:| , , ,
svu
JJJJ
i il i. ii
i i
,«YJI>.III"1.GMA.,MU.{ , ,
0 if fttix ii in in
U illl i UNULH 1'INALIY 1
111*" BAbEU ON MY If.ClUI
CL)l."ltI£ 1 AM AWAHt 111*
• ' B03i43
OXrCEN DENAN-TOT
" MG/L' " "
i
r
f
c
-
r '
'
(
(
-
f
f"
£
1
DAILY AVG
C.J
o, -
1 )>
U'l
[Vi
L/l
qq
.- r
9 -
HIGH
LOW
7)"
<• 7
^ .
r
11
'I "1
r
-
i( "?
/' ?
/ v 1
/' '
x /cr
1 )l
1 11
\~'L
O 3
|5~t
AVIRAGf
AXIMUM
~u»«r.0
*G
1
1
1
1
1
iiii l/?i3
it'll/ 1 JtC
i t ' / • i i
1 I
Jf LAW IHAI 1 HAVt .frpflTONi
1Y Uf IHObE INIJIVlOUALS IMf.
70JOO
SOLIDS-D1S5-180C'
i
i
DAILY AVG
1 5 '*•)
M > 1 1,.
HIGH
fu-H
1
i
3
vn
' ^ *- >
i
l
MMIfl-
»r i'M
/
ij/j'/t/
l S
AVCKAGt
IAXIMUM
UWH(H Of
IOW
i.KI
1
1
1
1
1 1 ft 1 ? 1 if 1 'i
, I .Yl'/rClS
1 1 fill
1 1 1 1
YS REFO TING
«VC MAI VIOt |(|f
i
til
i l
i i
ai.*" ixAMimb AVU~AM'TAMI
/itpAifLY iitsfONsmu ron t
/ /
j
•3^ u
no
"/ 5"
/ / 3
^
J
V. i-
AVCftAGC
IAXWUM
UMBCR 0
„„,„
UXIMUM
HIGH
'
i i i i^iv
i j i
LOW
j,.j
. .(
i sY) 1 i •>'
iiii
ii iiii
>YS HlfOBTMG (Gil
""Y"'"-^-'-
DU^ TUNCH 111 ••!
.IAII Wllll 1lit IN!imM*AllUN *
UIAINING TMt INIOIIMAllON,
INIOflMAIlON INCLUDING THt
•17031
" '"LBS/OAY
A
l
1
1
'
I
1
1
VERAGE'
C.C-32 L
DAILY AVG
O
?
> ?yo
AVtflAGE
IAXIMUM
^UMtCH 0
AYS ( *Cf
1AXIKUH
16137
HIGH
LOW
1 1 C I'i
Illl
1 1 1
tYS HfrOKTING
lUI'JU MAXIMUM
01 i 1
/ r.i7
i i
1 '•
L ii
_i_ij
_i2
i i
ttuf ri/McH mill
UtlblllllU IN lll'lt "Ol!CTjMr~NI
UtUtVt IHAI THE INIUIIMA1
I'OSblLtlLirf Of ItNE AND IMfH
00100
•PH
0 TO 10
MAXIMUM
•9.5"
i
c
c
f
(
<.
c
(
c
(
c
c
<
c
(
(.
c
<
c
£
(
C
i.
c
c
C
DAILY AVG
tf
? °
V /
9.L.
9 G
V f
f f
T 1 .
? i
7?
_f 7
J '*
PC
/ ^
9 ^
? >
M , ..
MINIMUM
HIGH
9 ^
V 3
V
J
V / •
5 -3
V i
ri 'J
y -?
vr
9 /
V_J"
V ^
/ .3
<> J
9 L
9 u
? ,? i^*?
f. c
rV ...
y •?
_^j
9/
5o _
f. >'
)' '/
yo
*?_/
9 3"
v J
-------
OH CHEr.ICAl COMPm
IDlAND OIV
ll'LA'ID
MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT FOR
1MISISVOUKMONIMLV lllrOAI (OMMIOH
S££ AVERSE SIDE.? on nuuriN MAIL
PICJIC compltu 'T9 pr-
Dave lotm w» 1
l_a»
"TS 67
i
G
IOTAI ^.Ml-Ui TAKEN T j.'j'
.UWttlK UAfi Rt^OnUNG |(. j ^
.... «'_«'>A_ J__t_)_J_l_l_ "J
OUP I'b'ltll Ifllkl
iu»r UVAU ON mt
Cor 'lilt I AM AWAHt'.l
l , ij. ___ —
OTAL SAUPIIS TAKIN l(_jt I°JAL_?it'.1!-""_'?.
"».AA v,'l« ~J_
J_ J_1_J_1_)_1
nuM»HOAtS»lK'"l"«g I-I
TOTAL SAMPLES TArlN_ j ^_ 1C
DATS (KCUOING MAMIMU*^ ^ ^
'«L:FL:
IIUC fu'tCll ITK4I
1 IQIALSAMKtS AM« 1^ L
. LIAYfcr«tlUIMCMAJMM_UMj _1 .L
**• *•» T 1 _ LJU-1— t
luff rvhCrt it* MI
MATTnN >'riUMIIIIO IN lllli~DOCUMlN1 AND All AHACIIMtNIS •
MAI ON I HI I «VI IHAI II* INIOI.MAHON Ii IMUt. Al.CimAIC. AMD
JIMC, llli I'0'..MUILIIV Ul IINC AND IMI'IIIIONMINI
-------
JOrt CHEMICAL COMPANY
1IOLAUO OIV
iJOlAfVD
18640
565004,U5lop.B6
MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT FOR
THIS 15 rOUK MUNfMLV HLvanT t OHM tun
SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR RETURN MAIL
Pkjve complete and lubmd two cop*i ol inn toim
ai Ihi- end ol i-acli month Tim (cporl mull (each out
taming oFlicu by Ihr lOlh ol the month
PARf 1 - RETURN 70 DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
DOw CHEMICAL COMPANY
OUTFALL t Oil
PROC. HASTES TO
PERMIT EXPIRATION! JO/79
* ' ."
Date form w*
p»u««
R. 031
JI616
COL
IFORM-FEC*
JMAXI
lloAILY AVG
| 1
!•>
r
-
i
I
1
1
i
F
: j
J
HIGH
L
MUM
LOW
1
1
1
1
1
L
i
1 1
1
1
1
i
I
1
1
1 ' ...-/ I
! 1
i
I
TZ
-L.
i
1
>I"ACI
AIIMuU
t «•« »
I
i i i
i J.4
1
1
1
I
L. U
1 L
III ' 1 '
~;;;v.v.7,,, J
" 1 i j ,'
"« I/,'
' "
_ L i
la
il'
, r
CL.
'f. U.
1 0* LY AVG
HIGH
I
1
1
1
1
LOW
|
L
1
1
r
i
i
i
1
i
"•" '.ii i i i i i .
AI1MUV t [ j
' 1 1 1
_i_i_i_i_
'.. 1 1 . 1 .1 -I. L-J-
rs r^c.'iOiNG MA*
FW> PUNCH
- ~j -j— ' -
i^A. j. -i .
i i i i
i'i *ii
... '
i
DAILY AVG
i
HIGH
i
1
i
1
1
l
1
LOW
vEflAGF.
AK
MUM
,™!
, ,
1 1 1
i 1 1
.ill - L \ . 1
"'""""I" 1 1
-"j —
<. M.. ,KX I,,,,,
DUf fUNCM H* ••!
OBSERVATION .VISULi
. o 'TO a
MAXIMUM
0 '
i
DAILY AVG
».,
O
0
r
o
L;
C
Ci
c
n
(
r
n
^•1
(,
t-j
,-,
^
o
Ll
0
<_.
U
HIGH
LOW
1
vt(t«oe ,,, iC
A.IMUM , , , , , |L)
1 1 1 1 t 1
1 1 1 1 1
UMOflt OATS IIL'OMlNG
••••"««» 1 1 1 1
"Si:
OOP PUNCH t'» •**
.
i
-
CAILYAVG.
VEHAGE
AXIMUM
UMkEfl D
HIGH
LOW
iii i
.j_a_a_j .t
tvs iitraniiNG
0 MA. v^ | , J ,
D
, ,
1 ,1
1
1
JP fONCH Hi Ml
Consumers Power
Intake cfs
. -
i
DAILY AVG
C
^ t
(
f
C
t.
c-
(,
^',
^
1 .
.
0
^
f
1,
o
,1
,
>.
,
,
ViflACE
AXIMUM
HIGH
(
1 i 1
1 1 1
1 1 1 1
.1-l-l-J .
01 Ll L
LOW
t iC
1 I
1 1
OUf PUNCH in ••)
Consumers
Slowdown
1
DAILY AVG
r.
i
c
Cl
r
r
r
^
C-
O
^J
w ,
c
r
«.,
A
1 1
^
(,
u
CJ
vfftAQC
AXIMUM
Power
cfs
HIGH
i i i
1 1 \
i i i i
-L-.L.J 1 J
C MA« vi* ••)
5
10
IS
20
1
c
£
L
c L
a u
0
1 cr.l'lr < '.Ur< niiAiIV OF LAW 1MAI 1 |IAVE PERSONALLY EXAMINED AND AM FAMILIAR WITH THE INFOIIMATION SuOMIHCD IN THIS DOCUMENT AND ALL ATTACHMENTS AND
THAI IIA'.ld UN Mr M,Jl|IY UF IMOLi l/ii, V (,UAI S IMMEDIATELY HECI'ON'JIUIE (OR OBTAINING THE INFOIIMATlON 1 IIEIILVE IHAI TML IMIOKMAIION IS THUS. ACCURATE. AND
COMI.lIt 1 AM AV/AIIE cflAF IIILIIl ANV/SlCNlFICANf POlAlTlES (Oft SUDMIFIING f ALSC^INrOFllJlAIION. INCLUFJINC TML I'OE'jIOILIlY OF 1 INC ANO IMI'llliiONMlN I
V
V.
y
V
L r ,•
t,,
c*
J
u
't
•'•r
C.
i
C
f k r
-------
DOW CHEMICAL USA
MICHIGAN DIVISION ~ MIDLAND PLANT
NON-CONVENTIONAL/TOXIC POLLUTANTS — OUTFALL 031
PERMIT SMI 0000868
TABLE 2
Monitoring Results - June, 1985
Phenol
2, U-Dichlorophenoxy-
acetic acid
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
Chloroform
2,3,7,S-Tetrachloro-
dibenzo-p-dioxin
1,1,2 ,2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethylene
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Pentachlorophenol
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,U-Dichorobenzene
1,2,1-Trichlorobenzene
Methylene Chloride
2-Chlorophenol
2,M-Dichlorophenol
Naphthalene
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Bromoform
Chlorobenzene
Carbon Tetrachloride
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
Acrylonitrile
Concentration
ug/liter
3
HD(2)
ND(O.M
6
17 ppq*
ND(1)
ND(5)
ND(6)
~ ND(3)
2
1
6
ND(16)
NDCQ.5)
ND(1)
1 "
5
ND(5)
NDCO
MDC5)
MD(2)
2
MD(2)
Sample Concentration Sample
Date u g/liter Date
5/28/85
5/28/85
5/28/85
5/28/85
5/21/85 •
5/28/85
5/28/85
5/28/85
5/28/85
5/28/85
5/28/85
5/28/85
5/28/85
5/28/85
5/28/85
5/28/85
5/28/85
5/28/35
5/28/85
5/23/85
5/28/35
5/28/85
5/28/35
2
ND(2)
2
NDC14)
16 ppq*
HDC7)
ND(8)
ND(6)
NDC2)
1
1
4
11
ND<0.4)
NDC0.9)
NDC0.2)
ND(10)
MD(6)
NDC7)
MDC5)
HD(2)
2
MDC3)
6/10/85
6/10/35
6/10/85
6/10/35
6/03/85
6/10/85
6/10/85
6/10/85
6/10/85
6/10/85
6/10/85
6/10/85
6/10/85
6/10/85
6/10/85
6/10/85
6/10/85
6/10/85
6/10/85
6/10/85
6/10/85
6/10/85
6/10/85
ND = Not Detected
() = Lowest Detection Limit
= Concentration Reported as Part Per Quadrillion
-------
DOW CHEMICAL USA
MICHIGAN DIVISION — MIDLAND PLANT
NON-CONVENTIONAL/TOXIC POLLUTANTS — OUTFALL 031
PERMIT 0MI 0000868
TABLE 1
Monitoring Results - June, 1985
Phenol
2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic
acid
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
Chloroform
2,3,7,8-Tetrachloro-
dibenzo-p-dioxin
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethylene
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Pentachlorophenol
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,M-Dichorobenzene
1,2,U-Trichlorobenzene
Methylene Chloride
2-Chlorophenol
2,4-Dichlorophenol
Naphthalene
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Bromoform
Chlorobenzene
Carbon Tetrachloride
2 ,U ,6-Trichlorophenol
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
Acrylonitrile
Mass discnarge measured at 031a
Monthly
Average
(Ibs/day)
.6
.017*
~
2.1
2.8x10~6
—
—
—
—
.3
.2
1.1
—
—
I -
—
—
—
—
—
.4
—
t 031a
Daily Monthly
Maximum Average
(Ibs/day) (ug/1)
.8 3
.027* ND(2)
.4 ND(0.4)
2.7 10
3.2x10~6 17 ppq
ND(6)
ND(7)
ND(6)
ND(3)
.5 1.5
.3 1
1.5 5
2.1 ND(16)
— NDC0.5)
— ND(1)
.3 ND(0.2)
1.3 ND(10)
ND(6)
ND(U)
ND(5)
ND(2)
.5 2
ND(2)
Daily
Maximum
(Wg/1)
3
ND(2)
2
14
17 ppq
ND(7)
ND(8)
ND(6)
ND(3)
2
1 . :"{.
6 -\ " -"•
11 1 £
ND(.5)j 2§
HDC1) Jf
1
5
ND(6)
ND(7)
ND(5)
ND(2)
2
ND(3) =
iff =
i*l §0
««l tu
-------
Li
r \
• »DOH CHEMCAL COMPAMr
MIDLAND DIV
MIDLAND VI «86<|0
j ffACitll* huVfcilT'l IflHM.I NOMBtH j rti.l*AYl~ NUMttl
'J 1363001 I UlCLOQOfi&sJ 156015.8
MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT FOR JUr>« . i'^
02
* 4»0 •-• I II
4«J3 • <•/!>
THIS IS VOUR MONTHLY HEI'OHT f OHM FOB
SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR RETURN WAIL
PICJIC complete ind tulunit I wo copies of thu lorm
bl Ihc «nd ol t«ch monlh. Thu rcpon mull itach oui
Ummg ollicc by Ihc lOlh ol llic monlh.
PART 1 - RETURN TO DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
•OOH CHEMICAL COMPANY
OUTFALL I 03J
PROC. HASTES' TO T ITTABAHASSEEi R. 031
PERMIT EXPIRATIOH! 10/79
Dale loim wu
p,inlod
o
G '.
•
iflAM
AME
NITS
iMil
ATE
1
3
3
4
5
6
7
e
9
10
II
1}
U
M-
IS
16
U
is
19
214
ft
on
TEMP-WATER
F
I
( '
C"
c
^
1
DAILY AVG
,'
.• jr
'•V
';,-
.,
^
; S
. 1
- ,
, -
1 1
HIGH
,• J
7(f
/ -/
->t
-> '
" i
/y
,H
) ,.
"f
LOW
coi;:
i
i
1
,
i
*•
1
1
(
V |
.
/,
('• ' '
1 '/
21 |
2J
23
24
• t
1
25
26 J I
2)
28 |
29
30
31
-.I •'
'/i V i
( >/ 5i
(f
1 / 1
ITY
OHM Lab
HIGH
'"/"•
LOW
,t'\
' 'M < 1
1
7-/K
7
TTI
WERACt
VAXIM.-V
IOIAL US
, , , 7, ?!'/,-;
i i , i7'Vi/ >"
111'1 '
AYS niroi
Iflti TAK
i i | ,
" r
j-is [ »:ti oiNf, MAXIMUM! | |
.VI. ".. V
'Ol 1 i i i
i i
DUP PUNCH IH III
Ammonia - Nitroaen
ma/1 Net
1
i
(
i
DAILY AVG
c $
0 5
Ci 1
«
i
\
f
1
i
0 1
0 5
J
)
'' ^
^ ^
AVERAGE
MXIMUM
HIGH
'
LOW
.M
/
, , , r.,. ,9
II 1 1 1
.-i i i i i 1. 1-
OtAL SAMPLES TAKEN
JAYS EXCEEDING MAXIMUM
VI. u» VIOL | , ,
ri/
-H-
i /i
OUF^UNCH Ill/ll/
1 fid UY unuill I'INALTY OF 1 AVV ,
IHA: uAt,iu ON Mr NUUIHY uif tf
CO/-°U7£ 1 AM AWARE THAT IHLiK
J/IAT i lyw/f
/U^E IflWVlJJU*
Solids - Dissolved
kn/dav Net
i
c"
f
f
<
,
f
<•
f
,
t
^
DAILY AVG.
V^
Iff-
3^i
7?C
/ Vyc
III
k n
5 -. ff. i
:' J C ( (, f
JV3 i'^J1
Ik / c. sy
.5V/ v.r^,
^ yj Y ••?•
) f t' V 1 1
)f/ 9 L t- 7
)~>A 7 7/
cJ.'iC 7 / ii'
r
c
>" V
'•Jyc3
r
"(/ S •/<-(-
5-79 ./^r
X 7 ?i"L
AVERAGE
MAXIMUM
HIGH
LOW
f
1
i i"? i 'TiQ 16- 1 f i1/
i iSiC/-i1i9/r. iC
1 1 1 1 ) 1
,111 II
TOTAL SAMPLES TAKEN
DAYS EXCEEDING MAXIMUM
m i
i i
AVG MAX. VOL | , , | , ,
/5 DUP PUNCH l>» •*!
River Flow
cfs
i
•-
c
t
c
i
e
<•
,-
t
c
(
r
i.
(.
,
i
c
V
^
i
(_
DAILY AVG
6' V '1
3 (r. I
f / ?
'/I f
(t. V(r
r / 0-
v<, ";
t/t v
>• V'/
f • 7
( J "c
(/VLr
i ?•>-
/t V?
-" Jci
^ (i
x s.i
3.^) 1C
,) JV1-/
/")(:i
J^/r
/if- 1
HIGH
1
LOW
1
.
AVERAGE , , ,/ 1,0.^
«X,MUM , , , 1 3, 7iC/,r
1 1 1
ICITAI SAMPLES TAKEN , ^
JAYS EXCCCOING MAXIMUM |
«V(.
MAX. VIOL -| | | | 1 |
DUP PUNCH III III
River
'Available Cap'
kq/day
i
DAILY AVG
9>'t/ror:
/ 1 / 1 r i r •
iiMC" i" r
y7//COc
1 >"'
AVERAGE
MAXIMUM
V '' L C
HIGH
LOW
N
1
i/i?, nii-jifiC
i' i
i i
7/,/iCinc
i i i i i
TOTAL SAMPLES TAKEN
DAYS EXCEEDING MAXIMUM
>VC MAX VKX |
..i i I
C (
J — L_
UUP PUNCH I>t4ti
Phosphorus - Total
i
1
DAILY AVG
0 g
HIGH
LOW
AVERAGE , | , , ,(T ,. |'i
MAXIMUM (
..II 111
1 1 , 1 1 1 i
IOTAL. SAMPLIS TAKEN 1
j— l—
OAYS CXCCEOINC MAxtMuMJ , |
»VC MAX V.Ot
1 1 1 _L_1_.
DuP PUNCH in Ml
5
10
IS
20
25
30
fllSONAl/Y EXAMINED AND AM f AMU IAR WITH Tilt INIOMMATION SUIIMirlfD IN THIS DOCUMENT ANO ALL AIIAl_MMlNi» *«v
IS IMMtiSlATELY HLSI'ONilOlE tOH OIHAINING HIE INI UIIMAIION. 1 lltlllVfc IIIAT lilt INIOHMAIlON Ii TIlOl. ACCllMAll. AIIU
jWjjfHXlJIlS FOR SUBMITTING fAiil I^^OIIMATlON. IfJCLUOlNG Tilt COSEIUILITY Of I/NE AND IMI'HlSUNMUJl.
L
(c
y.
-------
i.
•*00l, CHEMICAL COMPANY
KJDIAiiD DIV
HlDLAHO
~] r»
J
56D304
MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT FOR
THIS l!> YOUII UON1HLY HI I'Olll I UMM f Of)
SEE nCVEHSC SIOC COR nCTUIIN MAIL
Plejic complete jncl lulMinl Iwo cupivi til tint luim
«l tin.- end ol cjch month. Thu ii-|iuil niuil inch uui
L-iniing olliLL- |jy Ilic 10th ol the month.
PART 1 - RETURN TO DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
* 44>0 »•• ( «
DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY
OUTFALL I 031
PROC.HASTE6 TO T1TTABAHAS3EE R. 031
PERMIT EXPlRATIONj
JO/79
Djlc I aim
printed
r
Lei/
61/10/23-
z
o
5 <
(AM
-ME
UTS
MIT
\Ti
i
j
3
4
5
6
7
8
8
10
II
12
U
U
15
16
17
19
20
21
23
24
25
?6
2Z_I
28
29
30
31
-.INLY
>MA«1
i'\
'f J
V
NACf
MUM
. • lia
1
,1,
|0
AVC MAJL VOL | | | |.
OUP PUNCH III HI
IAR WITH III! INIOMMATION
JMIAINIMU IHL IMIUIIMAIIUN
INIOHMAIION. INCLUDING IKE
•
p r
ft (-.
. f. /
7 9
r (i
_, v «•>
r
!
f
,3
y
7
7
7
7
RAGE
IMUM
N
) 7
77)
V
o
V
i i
• i
i i
'. 1 N It
(HIGH
/ 7
,l'C
/V
y
Ir
Vc-
: E:
V J
7 J
r v
/* C:
y '
/ ->
t'. V
y L
> v
7 G
ft
(• V
1 i
1 17
i i i i i
NUMBER OAYS REPORTING
IOTAL SAMPLES TAKEN
OAYSEXCEEOlNG MAXIMUM
iun
LOv;
C- ''
L 7
I /-
(, (.
I; V
/ V
/ /
/ J
y j"
7,t
7 j
L V
t 7
< 7
/ j
/ r
7 r
v ?
? <^
'i -i£
j i .
3i/
1°
AVC MAX. VIOL | | | | | |
OUP PUNCH II* ••'
AND AIL ArtACHMfNTS AND
IUN IS tlll'l, ACtUMAIC. A'lU
ISONMINT.
5
10
15
20
25
30
-------
I
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
486(10
MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT FOR
THIS IS YOUR MONTHLY RtPORT f OHM fOR
SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR RETURN MAIL
• 44 JO «" • •'
OOH CHEMICAL COMPANY
PROC.HASTES TO TITTABAHASSEE' R. 031
[ 5650JD'
*M
t
S
E
"
J
-
COLIf
i
rl
—
u_
NUh
IOT
DAY
"i
- DA
ME
]
DAIL
-
L.
HACE
)MUW
tttH 0
AL SA».
i lACt
M»< v
It
itCA J JWWiI hUMttA j [0 T*U NUMOIB
) 1 [ MIOOOQB6B 1 [5601.3.6
216
•QRM-
1E/1S>
_l
V AVG,
i
i
i i
AYS HtPO
CDINC, MA
16
FE
on
HA
Oft
HI
-r
CAL
Li
XI
o_
r,n
i i
1 l_L
1 i
1 1 L
fUlNG
iL- itf
u u
1UH
LOW
_J
1
_J
J
1
_i_
i
AV t
MA
UUS
fOT
DA LY AVG
_...
BAG! ' , [ _
.MOW ] ,
1 1 I
'11-
I8ER r»VS REPO
AL SAMPlESTAK
S EXCIEOI'.G M«
* L
ruP PUNCH
CCf.lIfY UNC
IHAt UASffJ
tUMI lilt 1 t
Plvtte complete »nd tuhmit i«o copici 01 inn lunn
11 ih* end o« «»cli month Tim icport moil reach our
Laming office by ih« lOlh of il* monih.
PART 1 - RETURN TO DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
HIGH
_l L
1 i t
1 1
L. 1 1
RTiHC
EN
XIMUM
J L_L
I7S kt
JtR FE
ON M
kM AW
LOW
1 1
l
l
1ALTY
INOII
AKL III
1
AV
MA>
IOT
DAY
AVC
OF
MY
A!
OAIL
RAGE
IMUM
AL SAI,
S IXCE
MAX V
D
LAW
or i
IIILUL
Y AVG
1 1
CUSTAK
EDING MA
CJL
UP PUNCH
THAT-I
KjfilrVlN
r^ff Sl
HIGH
111
1 1 L
1 t.
1 1 L.
HAVE-f
OIVIplI
jNI/IC/l
.A
LOW
. 1 1.-
1
.11
1 1
1 i .
•tfl^JN
i\M IM
fn*
'/////,
OBSERVATION .VISUU
0/TO •«' ' "
M/
0
i
AVi
MA
T01
OA1
ALL
MH
Al
kXlHUM
DAILY AVG.
C
f
'
t •
L.
RAGE
(IMUM
AL SAI.
SEXCI
MAX V
D
Y EW
JIA/jfl
T
.A.
C 1
O
i
O
U
0
1 1 —
I 1
KYS REPO
IPLES TAK
EDING MJ
MX
JP PUNCH
MINED
Y RESP<
JM suu^
^
HIGH
L. 1
|_ i 1
DTING
EN
XIMUb
1 1 1
17ft •*
AND A
3NSIOI
vlll MN(
T
LOW
1
_J
E
;
/
K
K
1
1
LLLL
i i .
FAM
Fort .
PERMIT
EXPIRATION! 10/79
Dale form was
printed
Consumers Power
Intake cfs
t
AV
MA
NU
TO
OA
AVll
LIA
OH
JIN
DAILY AVG.
flAGE
XIMUM
riDER D
AL SAh
rs EXCE
MAX V
R WIT
AlNIN
uiirw
r .. 1 1
1
1
lYS HEPO
PLES TAK
EDING M/
101
LJP PUNCH
H THE
C, THC 1
UION. If
HIGH
L_l L.
i 1
J 1 L.
1 1
HTING
EN
XIMUV
1 1 I
NFOflM
NIOflM
ii.Lun
LOW
ATlON
»1lON.
lu lilt
I
AVt
MA
NUI
UA
su
1 f]
I'C.
DAIL
HAGE
(IMUM
HtfK D
s EXCE
MAX V
0
SMITH
ElltV
^MUlt
f AVt
_o
u
AYS REPO
EDING U>
IOL
UP PUNCH
0 IN TF
THAT
I1Y OF
HIGH
1 1 1
1 1 I
HTING
XIMUW
|7t •
1IS OO
THE IP.
FINt A
LOW
1 Id
1 1^
1 1.
Ill/
1 1
' l
l
CUMEN
(OnMA
•JU IMI'
1, M* on
81/10/39
Consumers Power
Slowdown cfs
i
AVf
MA
NU
ro
OA
AVC
r A
TIO
IIM
DAILY AVG
c
'
C
c
C
c
O
RAGE
KIMUM
MERD
AL SAI.
rSExCE
MAX V
0
ND AL
N IS 1
(UMLN
j
c
i
>
Tj
_1 — I
__| 1
1 1
AYS RE
IPLES T
EDING
tOl
UP PON
L ATI
Hill.
[
PO
AK
MA
CM
A
HIGH
L t i-
1 — 1 — U
L 1 1-
1 1 1
RTING
EN
XlMOM
L 1
CHMEN
•XURAl
LOW
1 4-
1 <•
1 -
1
ill
1 i
i
E, ANC
I1
G
UJ
V)
1
10
IS
20
z
o
t-
u
26 «
30
)
-------
DDK. CMEHICAL CUI'.PAUY
KJDLAUD D1V
fii *ctttrt^imr/m* 1 J"*-t»»«iiT""wuMbrii | 10
1360304 I LMlOOO.0-8.6eJ L
MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT FOR
THIS ii vooii MOMIMLV niroiu ruiiM Ion
SEE HCVEIISE SIDC FOR RCTUIIN MAIL
Pkjic complete j«rt iuliinil Iv/o col'ici ol llm loim
i,t iht tnd el Lvch monih. Tliu miion niujl it-acli oui
(..intiug olliLc by Htc 10th ol lU- month.
PART 1 - RETURN TO DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
19/f
4<;o >••• in
DOW CHEMICAL COHPAHY
OUTFALL I 031
PROC,HASTES TO TITTABAWASSEE:H. 031
PERMIT EXPIRATION! 10/79
. . nr,
Dale loim was I
piinied I—'
8l/_ JO/25.
z
o
M
S
r
-
~
-
«^(
FLOW cot
MGO
125C
WJI
)
c
I
"
DAILY AVG
"•; /
'• ' ^
V ' ' '
V' -r
;, (_
V ' '
'
" /
• i
• ' */
••' v
- ^/
;
J / i '
i
) i
• ' j'
.' i 1
' ' 1
T
—
LY
MT
|
i
J
Avtft*C(
MAfciUuM
,0,,
U SAW
1
T
HIGH
LOW
no^i ft
BOD-5
t\r, /I • Nef
)
1
1
1
.
tl< i7
— LJ
I
PUS,
•vi V.i" v« "
lING UA
. UA 1 1
1
L_
i J
—
H
1
III M
'A c/i i S
i i i
JLi-LL
_1_
1
1
u i
l_
; 1 '
1 1.
V 1
0< LY AVG
'* S
1
HIGH
1
i S
'' C
• ' •;
i i ."
,, a
AVERACi
MUKIKUy
IOIAL ^i\
LOW
• t'1
1
, ) i i^'i. i7
' i
i i i i l
PtiSTAKCN |
6
WC MA. VIU ],,,,!
DJP PUNCH in i4i
1 (i i
IIIA'.
no
OXYGEN 0
" hG/l '
i
, '
^_
(
^
5
£
13'
IAN-TOT
DAILY AVG.
C1"/
^
7
-c J
L) .'
C ('/ ~^
-
^_
^
-
L
i_
/t
\''
^ '/
c; ^
v/
. , -j
l_c 3
I
i- ^
i '. ^-j
C ^
f •'•'
-'/
C 2)
(
,)' •,'
IC1-/
HIGH
i
LOW
1
1
|
1
AVERAGE
MAXIMUM
1 1
1 1
.1 1
, , , nn
t i i/ iOi7
it ii
ill
TOTAL SAMPLES TAKEN
«y& MA4 vtoi ' j
i i r
_| L_
l J
|C
1. 1
1 1
DUP PUNCH l>* *4)
'70300
SOLIDS-DI5S-180C'
' WG/L1' '
i
|
1
(
,
1
1
1
DAILY AVG.
L
r
V
{<^c
IMO
7.X*
HIGH
V
'/^
^
f V3-
V.P9C
AVERAGE
MAXIMUM
i i
i i
i i
LOW
, >.
1
1
1
|L/l'/|i/l!>
i i5 i/ ii i1^
i i i i
TOTAL SAMPLES TAKEN
AVG MAX WH | , , ,
1
l<, 1 /
1 1
L L
OUP PUNCH l>» 4«i
i|7030
.SOLiOS-SUS-NET
'• HIVL' ' '
A
;3
i
i
1
i
i
,
/ERAGEI MAXIMUM
) US ' ' '•
DAILY AVG,
i 1.
3 • '
•? 'J
.J.) f'
>/ ^/
?L~' /
H ^
HIGH
IM '
LOW
•/•I
AVERAGE , | , | | |^|, '^
MAXIMUM , , |'~V 1 'J
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
IOTAL. SAMPUS TAKEN f /
AVG MAX VKH | t ( i f
OUP PUNCH u» •«(
.17031
.30L'IDS-SUS-NET#D
IBS/DAY
AVERAGE'
i
\
\
!
r
1
1
1
1
DAILY AVG.
'J \'5
<-/5~G
''AX'
V '/' ' ^r
*/ ^ i" i"
<> 7V.I
'ilV'l
1AXIKUM
18 U7
HIGH
LOW
AVERAGt | | , |1 ClC I*-/
MAXIMUM , | , lii'^lVl.*
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
TOTAL SAMPLES TAKEN
. 1°' /
.1
AVC MAX VIOL. ||| |
OUP PUNCH III 141
00100
'PH
0 TO 11
MAXIMUM KlNIMUK
-95' 6.0'
i
, '
C
C
c
c
1
f
,'
t N
r
(
<
<
r
c
r
<
c
f
f
(
DAILY AVG
-/ 7
7 3
1 0
(r V
/ /
(L 1
(, f
(l J'
i. r
/ r
6 J
7o
'/. '/
P.I
p j
') j
? o
Jr' J
.* V
V '/ .
» i
S. 3
HIGH
?' *
V V
V '
«f y
t-v
(, v
(. >
t ''
, ,i
i- i1
<< y
•/,-
j
p >
? o
f Y
L^i
'- - *
i i
£_,"
i -
7 ^
_L^
AVtRACt , , , |
MAXIMUM | 1 1 1
LOV/
7 i
V /
<•• r
4 r
d r
( '?
i- 7
f,- /
"• 1'
i, )'
i. /
(. J
7 /
'/ V
r/
j i
/ 7
'/ /
i J
i >
l- ;
'/.'/
'/,. -
MIN ii,i I*,. 7
IOTAL SAMPLES TAKIM
AVC MAX VKX 1 1
OUP PUNCH l>*
ll( UIJIHII I'lllAIfY l)f IAW IIIAI 1 HAVE I'tntiONAIIV fXrtMINCO AND AM FAMH IAK WITli 7IIC IHI CIHMA1ION EKIIMinfO IN IHIS OOCl/MfNf AND All AHACHMIP
UALtD OH Mf INUUMIY L)/ IHO'jt INDIVIDUAL!) IMMkLllAltLY HtifONilUlt >OH nillAININli till IMIUIiMAIIUN. 1 UlLltVl IMAt 1l»[ IWKlllMAIlON IS IIIOl. A(.(.llll«
EfE 1 AM AWAflE I/IAT^tftE A«£ flCfllflCA.H1 I'tNAjflXS tOft SL/OMIT7ING FAISU l»/fO/IMA7lON. INCtUtUNG THE FOSSIBlUlY Of flNt AND IMCRlSOHMtur.
L .t
1 1
141
JT
il
S AND
. AN(I
5
10
15
20
25
30
zl.
o
-------
-DOW CHEMCAL COMPAWT
MIDLAND DIV
MIPLAND ! : Ofl6<|0
MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT FOR
THIS IS YOUH MONTHLY RCrOUT IOIIM fOH
SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR RETURN MAIL
Ptenc complete »n<1 tuumil two eopi«» ol llm loim
ti i to end ol t
i
~i~
i j
i
- Y
UA
1
' 1 I
. 1
. 1
I j
i
-
A;r«TcT
*UHd[ H LJ
1
i.
A.
J*>i t ACUCJINC
CC. M** VHj*
II
HIGH
L '/'
(. 1
; ({
\ * t
^
, 1 -
1 1
LOW
L
| 000
COI;:UCTIV
MTTR-
1
T
L.a i \ i'/t'
MJH?IN& 1 i .
I'M ''irk i
-.' J. ' .
-VI
Dt LY AVG
Mil
f -lit?
'" '. 1
' K J
/ /*/ i
7 7-1 i
UU ,
35
IT
Oli
HI
L^nims olliccbY the lOlh of Ihc month. ru--*. w-. .-,.,. -
PART 1 - RETURN TO DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
r
•\ Lab
3H
I
\'h\
'•*'"•'-•" Illl
Illl
Illl
.UIIS1-- DAYS REronilNQ
LCJ
I
I
I
LOW
7TJ"
i'f i ?
i
.. r/
JAYS HJElOll.C MAAIMU)^ | |
•"• M" "<" Illl 1
OUP PurjCH I'l III
1 I ,,,llir UNO II I'l MAI IY (
III/,,' UAU U UN Mf iriUIJI
COI.'-'LLIE 1 X>M AWAHE TH^
Ammonia - Nitroaen
mn/l Net
1
1
1
1
1
DAILY AVG
I.I
3 C
AVE
C .d
RACE , ,
HIGH
i
/
LOW
.
.A.IMUM , , , ,'.
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
UMUEK DAYS REPORTING
UTAL SAMPLES TAKEN
L,.,2
J — L_
AYS EXCEEDING MAXIMUM |
DUP PUNCH !>» •»!
Jl IAW IIIAT 1 HAVE PfflSON
lY Ul mO'-A iNIJIVlDUAlii IMI
T llllHE A>(t SIGNIFICANT I'Ui
CL^ / •' /
Solids -
kn/dav
i
'
AVE
DAI
s •)•
VCJ, /'J
RAGE
.UXIMUM
NUMIER 0
TOTAL SAI.
l if
HIGH
LOW
f
1
| (0 '/ C/lV
. '. i-.i
1 i .i_l_
»YS REPORTING
IPLtS TAKEN
DAYS EXCEEDING 1
AVC MAX VKM..
OOP PUNC
MLY EXAMINfO
vllOIAULY Illl.
ALTltS fOII SU
I/I--
1 1
1
Illl
H l» •«
AND AM FAMI
•UNL.IUU HJII (
IMI 11 ING fAlit
^r />
River Flow
cfs
i
c
t
i
c
AVt
DAILY AVG
,' j
\ L- : V
i«i i1
n i
K. S J
Ih'l
Pi 1
II (1
i *j
y - V
i ^ vr
/ ^ / 7
'' J V
-1. 5
HAGE , ,
HIGH
1
i!
IUMBER DAYS REPORTING
IOTAL SAMPLES TAKEN
LOW
1 1
i .C
kVC MAX VK}L 'III 1
DUP PUNCH l>» ••)
IAFI WITH THf INFOMMAIION
jlltAiNiMj Illl INI OhMAlKJN
INI/UKMAllUN. INC.LUOING lilt
River
i
t
T
kVt
' f *'
Dale loim w«
punted 1 — W.
'Available Cap'
kn/dav
DAILY AVG
/L J'A.
/53V ,
i ' id.
3C ^
r
(AGE
NUMBER D
TOTAL SAI
_J
HIGH
LOW
I'-),' 1
1 ! 1 M 1 1 1 \~-
\ 1 1 1 1
'I'll
AYS REPORTING
IPLES TAKEN
/I/I1/
. If K
t 1
tV
AVG MAX VtOi | , !
OUP PUNCH l>& <•!
IDIIMIIHO IN THIS HOC I MINI
HUH VI IMA! Illl Kill UMA
l-ObSIUIUlY Of IINC AND IMC
M» D<>
MO/29
Phosphorus - Total
mn/l
i
i
AV{
DAILY AVG
RACE , |
HIGH
s
1 K
1 1 1 1 1 -
1. 1 1 1 1 1
NUMIER DAYS REPORTING
IOTAL SAuritl TAKEN
LOW
.
AVC MAX V.O1 i | 1 |
DUP PUNCH <'&••!
AND All ATTACHMENTS AND
IK.H 10 1IMIC. Af.CIIIIAII. AfltJ
fa
L
UJ
\r
5
10
15
20
25
10
u
LU
">.
-------
c
DOW CHEMICAL USA
MICHIGAN DIVISION — MIDLAND PLANT
NON-CONVENTIONAL/TOXIC POLLUTANTS — OUTFALL 031
PERMIT *MI 0000868
TABLE 2
Monitoring Results - May. 1985
Phenol
2,4-Di chloropheno xy-
acetic acid
Bi s(2-chloroethyl)ether
Chloroform
2,3,7,8-Tetrachloro-
dibenzo-p-dioxin
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethylene
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Pentachlorophenol
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichorobenzene
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Methylene Chloride
2-Chlorophenol
2,4-Dichlorophenol
Naphthalene
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
Bro 010 form
Chlorobenzene
Carbon Tetrachloride
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
Acrylonitrile
Concentration
y g/liter
5
33
2
12
3 PPQ*
ND(7)
ND(9)
ND(7)
ND(5)
2
1
4
ND(6)
ND(0.6)
ND(1)
ND(0.2)
10"
14
ND(4)
ND(5)
ND(3)
1
ND(2)
Sample Concentration Sample
Date u g/liter Date
4/30/85
4/30/85
4/30/85
4/30/85
4/21/85
4/30/85
4/21/85
4/30/85
4/30/85
4/30/85
4/30/85
4/30/85
4/30/85
4/30/85
4/30/85
4/30/85
4/30/85
4/30/85
4/30/85
4/30/85
4/30/85
4/30/85
4/30/85
3
5
2
NDC12)
3 ppq*
ND(6)
ND(9)
5
10
0.8
0.6
2
5
ND(0.5)
ND(1)
0.2
ND(9)
ND(6)
ND(4)
ND(5)
ND(2)
0.7
2
5/13/85
5/13/85
5/13/85
5/13/85
5/08/85
5/13/85
5/13/85
5/13/85
5/13/85
5/13/85
5/13/85
5/13/85
5/13/85
5/13/85
5/13/85
5/13/85
5/13/85
5/13/85
5/13/85
5/13/85
5/13/85
5/13/85
5/13/85
ND = Not Detected
() = Lowest Detection Limit
= Concentration Reported as Part Per Quadrillion
-------
DOW CHEMICAL USA
MICHIGAN DIVISION ~ MIDLAND PLANT
c.
f~i*
NON-CONVENTIONAL/TOXIC POLLUTANTS — OUTFALL 031
PERMIT 0MI 0000868
TABLE 1
Monitoring Results - May, 1985
Phenol
2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic
acid
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
Chloroform
2,3,7,8-Tetrachloro-
dibenzo-p-dioxi n
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethylene
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Pentachlorophenol
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichorobenzene
1,2,M-Trichlorobenzene
Methylene Chloride
2-Chlorophenol
2,4-Dichlorophenol
Naphthalene
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Bromoform
Chlorobenzene
Carbon Tetrachloride
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
Acrylonitrile
Monthly Daily Monthly Daily
Average Maximum Average Maximum
(Ibs/day) (Ibs/day) (ug/l> (ug/D
.7 .84
.058* .116* 19
.3 .4 2
— 2.1 ND(12)
6.3x10"7 7.4x10~7 3 PPQ
ND(7)
ND(9)
ND(7)
1.8 ND(5)
.2 .3 1.U
.1 .2 0.8
.5 .7 3
.9 ND(6)
ND(0.6)
ND(1)
- — NDC0.2)
1.8 ND(9)
2.5 ND(6)
ND(4)
— . ND(5)
ND(3)
.1 .2 0.7
.4 ND(2)
5
33
2
12
3 ppq
ND(7)
ND(9)
ND(7)
10
2
1
4
5
ND(.6)
ND(1)
0.2
10
14
ND(4)
ND(5)
ND(3)
1
2
Mass discharge measured at 031 a
-------
>OH CHEMICAL COMPANY
UOlAUO DIV
iIDLAND
563flOM6(fl I jlTn U L NUM8C (Hi
illPJ!8.0868_j L?6$I3 i_)
MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT FOR
THIS IS YOUH MONTHLY REPORT FOflM fOH
SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR RETURN MAIL
Pic tic complete and submit iwo copitl ol lint loim
at the end ol each month Thil report mull reach our
Laming oflicc by the 10th o( the month.
PART 1 - RETURN 70 DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
02
• 4470 »'• • •<
4(1) t«»0
OOH CHEMICAL COMPANY
OUTFALL « 031
PROC,HASTES TO TITTABAHASSEE* R. 031
PERMIT EXPIRATION*
JO/79
Date lorm v»«
printed
I
COL!
1
i
i
•t
FOR
HE/
DAILY A
16
M-
15
YG
_L
_i
16
FECAL
MAX!
HIGH
1
.
5"^
HUH
LOW
)
1 1
j: •
i
I
1
t
i
1
i i
i
i
I
i
i
j
~ i
|_
'Vl'lALI
...MUM
UMUIH U
-1 -
I
*fi Ht
01 A 1 SAMI*LIS 1
OAlt
1
1 1
. 1
L-L
l_ L
1 I _1.
'x»nl iNO
»~ml N 1
1 N
"•A«>M,.M| , ,
J
J
1
_J
1 >\\ f''/-
,-
d out"?
1 0* LY AVG
1
i
i
HIGH
LOW
1
i
j_
VJRAGI ' , | ,
AlUklUM | ( (
1 1 1 1
1 1 1 i
1 1 i [ 1 1 1 1
'-ill
uwlitH r-tS HffOH
..I-.L.
TlllG
OTAL S-**'PUS TAKEN
A»S lAC.'EUlNG MAXIMUM
"' "" "°' 1 1 1 1
PLJP t-UNCH I'l 1C)
1
1 1
~
1
DAILY AVG
—
1
AVERAGE
1AXIMUM
l
j
HIGH
LOW
i i
UMULH DAYS hEPOATiNG
OTAL SAMPLES TAKEN
AYS t XCELOING MAXIMUM
VC M*. V.CH
1
1— i '
U
l i
i i
1
i
DUP PUUCH |7S i*t
1 CU.IIf'Y UNDIH CtNALTY OF LAW
IMA, 1)/",IU ON MV IMtlUMY Ol U
CljMUlU 1 /-M AV/AHt IHAI IhLllt
THAT
OISERVATION .VISULi
MAXIMUM
0 '
i
t
i
i
i
I
i
i
i
,
,
i
i
i
i
,
i
i
,
i
,
i
,
i
l
i
i
i
,
i
i
DAILY AVG.
,,
0
C
L
J
^
,~
,-
c
TJ
O
c
^
O
c
c.
c
c
t
c
i
c.
c~
AVE1AGE
MAXIMUM
,
UMBER DAYS HE
OTAL SAI.
HIGH
LOW
f
III 1C
1 1 1 1 |( '
1 1 1
1 1 1
URTING
PLES TAKEN
AYS EXCEEDING MAXIMUM
VC MAX VKH
ti|o
,3,0
, P
1 1 t 1 1
UUP PUNCH IH IBI
-
1
—
(
DAILY AVG.
AVffiACf,
MAXIMUM
NUMfUfl 0
HIGH
i i , i
i ,
1
1
. j_i-.i i .
OTAL SAMPLES TAKtN
DAYS EXCEEDING MAXIMUM
vC
MA* V
,01 | .
DUP PUNCH
l)b a
LOW
1 1
1 i
J_l
1 I
1.1
ij
Consumers Power
Intake cfs
. . -
i
*
DAILY AVG
c
,
f
c
1-
c
,t
,
,
,)
(
c
f_
,
1
c.
1
c
, I
AVERAGE
MAXIMUM
HIGH
,
LOW
1 1 1 1 1 rf
1 1 1 1 1 l(
11 II 1
1 1 1 1 1 1
NUMtifA DAYS REPORTING
TOTAL SAMPLES TAKEN
AYS EXCEEDING MAXIMUM
.t-
1
VC MAX VIOL | | | L |
OUP PUNCH i>* M*
Con
Bit
.umers Power
)wdown cfs
1
DAILY AVG
•
f
<_
(
(
c,
i
r
^
C
^
(.
c-
c-
(-
-
'
t"
f
f
~
C,
t
AVERAGE
MAXIMUM
HIGH
i i i r
i i i i
i i i i
i i i
UMIER DAYS REPOR
OIAL &AI.
LOW
1 H
1 i <
_! I
TING
riPLES TAKEN
AYS EXCEEDING MAXIMUM
VC MAX VIOL 1 ,
11
',.-
ij/
11
l i
DUP PUNCH lUIti
5
10
15
20
25
30
t HAVE PERSONALLY EXAMINED AND AM FAMILIAR W»TH THE INfOHMAllON SUBMITTED IN THIS DOCUMENT AND ALL ATTACHMENTS AND
INUIVIDUAIS IMMLUtATCtY HbU'ONMOit FOH OHfAINING 1H( INf (JMMAfiON, 1 BClltVf THAT THE (NfOftMATION IS TRUE, ACCtmAH. AND
SlGfJlFlC/sNf I'ENALllLS fOH SUOMITIING ^^^ INlOtiMAllON. llJCl UUiNU ll'lL C(JL"T*lUtLl IV Of I^NC AND IMMtlMJNMLNf
(P
.
/ CIRTIIlCAIION NUMBCH_^Q(| J 2 fl 7-
-------
Summary of Results
(1) 2,3,7,8-TCDD was not detected in any of these Michigan sample
extracts. ACB-75 (received 02/08/79). Other tetrachlorodibenzo-
p-paradioxin (TCDD) isomers were detected.
(2) TCDD isomers were detected in DS-1 and DCW-2 based upon (a) capillary
column GC/HRMS multiple ion monitoring analyses - m/e 320, 322 and
chlorine isotope ratio; (b) capillary column GC/HRMS peak matching
analyses of m/e 320 at 8500 mass resolution in real time; and (c)
one of these TCDD isomers had the same exact mass and same GC
retention characteristics as a 1,3,6,8-TCDD standard (DS-1).
(3) The collection efficiency of the carbon filters for 2,3,7,8-TCDD is
unknown. Furthermore, the analytical extraction efficiency for
2,3,7,8-TCDD from carbon is not known. The limit of detection
for 2,3,7,8-TCDD was based on a. theoretical 100% collection and
extraction efficiency. The actual efficiency is not known.
(4) The carbon collection and analytical extraction efficiency must be
determined before such data could be fully utilized.
-------
»\
• r
I
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY DIVISION
HEALTH EFFECTS RESEARCH LABORATORY
DATE:
April 9, 1979
Results for Analyses of Environmental Samples from Michigan - Region V -
for 2,3,7,8 Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD)
FROM: Edward 0. Oswald, Ph.D., Chief ^^LM^-^S- V>-
Analytical Chemistry Branch, ETD, HERL (MD-69)
T0: Mr. Karl E. Bremer, Toxic Substances Coordinator
U. S. EPA, Region V, 230 Dearborn St.
Chicago, Illinois 60604
THRU: F. Gordon Hueter, Ph.D., Director
Health Effects Research Laboratory (MD-51)
and
William F. Durham, Ph.D., Director
Environmental Toxicology Division (MD-66)
Attached you will find the results of analyses for samples of
water, sediment and carbon filters from Michigan - Region V - for
2,3,7,8-TCDD. These environmental samples were shipped from Michigan
to the EPA Pesticide Monitoring Laboratory (PML) at Bay St. Louis,
Miss, where these samples were extracted and prepared for GC/MS analysis.
The final purified extracts and appropriate controls then were
shipped to the Analytical Chemistry Branch in Research Triangle Park, NQ.
Upon receipt of the sample extracts, these analyses were carried out by
members, of the Analytical Chemistry Branch, ETD, HERL using high
resolution capillary column gas chroraatography interfaced with high
resolution mass spectrometry in the electron impact multiple ion moni-
toring mode.
In order to confirm the presence of 2,3,7,8-TCDD in these samples,
the analytical data must meet the criteria as outlined in the attached
Table 1. Attached you will find a summary of results for these
analyses and information on the general extraction and cleanup procedures
and the overall mass spectrometric techniques utilized for analysis of
2,3,7,8-TCDD
The results of these analyses were conveyed to you by phone on
5 March 1979.
This report completes the analyses for 2,3,7,8-TCDD on all environ-
mental samples received from EPA Region V by the Analytical Chemistry Bra
ETD, HERL.
Attachments
-------
APPENDIX B-4
PCOOs and PCDFs
1978 USEPA Study
-------
i; J
V
I
. /*•
•(•
r
.o
c
o
c
.'o
o
c
o
•DOM CHEMCAL COMPAMT
HIOLAUD UJV
n(iiciir«"fc.>Miin~j |««MTi Nu-iun| hi "A
Ls&oooi I UIICOQOQ<,BJ Lsb
MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT FOR
IMIS is yoini MOM HI Y n£ i utn I OI*M f on
sic iicvinst suit ron iiciuiiN MAIL
• I llu roil Hi ijji n.wnlh II. it u (-..'I '"fii it. tcli owl
I «i»mg oll.ci tii1 Hi? lOlli ul tl'l month
PART 1 - RETURN 10 OUT Of NATURAL KISOUHCES
03
DDH CltCKlCAL COMPANY
OUTFALL I Oil
PfiOC. PASTES 10 T ITTABAHASSEE. Fl. 031
PERMIT EXPJRATIOKI IO/7«
Djte dim w.,,
pi...ltd l_
I'ARAf.
NAMC
u;jirs
Lir.'.ll
DATE
7-1
2
J
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
(
TEHP-H/
F
i
c
<•
r
r
c
r
r
f"
UE
1
DAILY AVG
71
7fc
75
~7l
7 a
7 J
t'l
71
73
f] 71
i. If!
12
I]
14
16
16
1?
IB
19
20
£ 21
22
23
24
-fj
^
ri
r I
r )
'[
f
<" i
rf
r 1
25 | r |
26
27
28
— -.
71
7T
V'f
7"»
76
/"•
7 1
>i
72
Tt-
~> j
> j
->:>
7'
n
R
HIGH
71
Ts
7V
t )
fcl
Tt,
7 '
?T
7H
77
-/ •>
T 7*/
J
~
' \ 71
r 1 7o
<" | 7f
29 |C' |
30 c |
X
;;?£:;;
>V(B
-t
i, t
IcT
*AA MUM
U1A
'All
1
SA»
t 1
f 1
~~ET~
T'c
"'t
7J
"Fi
/3~
> )
7*1
J J
~"i
~/l
73
C-'f
Vc,
t _ a l . J i
/ 1 ES
XCt iUINC
LOW
coi;:
1
1
1"
r
i
1
r
i
1 1
i
i
i
1 1
1 1
i
"
.
i
i '
,v
A*
l/c
"l" f-J ->'
1
'-•!
• •'i
L.-l
i
Di
OO.C
UCTIV
MKR-
LY AVG
7307
7'3<"
7c tfe
T«| 77
S«:i7
6cr't
7 lt*(
7nv
•vEfiAC-
95
ITV
OHH
HIGH
C«
LOW
«,.«*
1
jTjCi 1 jf
__t _l-O_J l 1 i
CJTM S-MPLf 5 1AKE" J ( (fc
«rijx_lED,i,G^A_x,.;io.j_i_1
"".""*. ]_ || |
1 t 1 .till T UMN II 1 1 l/Al )Y IJ
frflMoNI* . NET
rrf
i
,
i
i
i
DAILY AVG
IT-O
C.(
O.I
C. 1
i
i
i
t
0.1
•i. J
^-1
O.I
HIGH
,^.,
/
LOW
3u. -t
VLRAGC , , , , ,O, . , 1
AXIKIUM . -
.O ..1
L_J_1. J. 1- L.J.
OIAL SAMI'LES 1AKEN | ( ^
AYS EXCEEDING MAXIMUI^J | |
t_"" ".".' _.j _ 1 1 1 J .
our ri'NLM IM »»i
l 1 AW 1IIAI 1 IIAVI 1 1 II'.OU/
— l
Sol
1
C
^r
f
f
r
r
T"
Y~
r
t
r
r
«.
.i&i . Oi-
Kt/OAT
DAILY AVG
j •/ 2 1 a i
1
^V
V I f f
/ ' 3 < 1
j'ii •)'••'•
»v
S i
i 3
1 -111
V >1/
JXJ-IIJ
•j'i -'H^
J-.W 1'*
i */ J 1 * ,--
" H "7 ' V "
1
' 5'f
3 H
/o 1,
|S7/
't~>'(
' Tl
7< 1
Vic
1('S
1AGE
AKIMUM
OIJ
AYi
IAII
L SAh
[XLE
Wll
HIGH
.„
1
i l l i i'i
LO'.V
__.
^
_1 J_i_J_i_l_J_
1 1 I 1 1 1 1
^iES TAKEN 1
tUlNG HA*IMllJ
If r\iliCH I't •!)
1 lltl IMUiHM/
j i
liLlll !
AV>*
i
—
icc/pAr
r
DAILY AVG
"7
HIGH
1
1
I
"
- —
1 J-jllMS)
1
LOW
X
1
VENACE
*«XII.IUM
"Z
OIAL SAk
vc Mil V
f'
iil-r.ii n
1 ' if 1
1 1 1
1 1
i_l L 1 — I
_t._l _!__ J . J .
J I.
t-s
r— l— *—
PLtS TAKtN ^ .
* ) - I J 1
*f f J-. 'rt I'l »»i
'-"'
'i
"or/
^U pH^SRHf
^
^ 1
i
-
~
...
-
AVI
OAIIV AVG
_
o.S
—
HAG I
IMOM
OIAL S*
*¥<, MU
/,IH/ A
-O-.J - J
. L. L-. 1
1 1 1
*nl S IAK
"" i
L All/,'
HIGH
.__
IO.V
—
j jO^tfS
.1 IPI- s
.1 L I
1 L |
l.r«G 1 1
."|-.'T
s i
1 1
"1 II.
-------
M
il '• fWt*«!
iiUjfiaL it* • AiiliiljiulalllUlli^.li
c
C
o
c
c
c
o
»«DOH CHtnlCAL COMPANt
MIDLAND DIV
MIDLAND :••' 'IB6HO
MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT TOR
lltti li 1 iJlllt t.Uir< I III V 111 M»'i I t OHM I (JM
oa
SLC HLVlim
roll ItLUUtN MAIL
Pt»j-,p ciiniplrlc -rul uil.n.i( u.o cup. Li ot ll.a touti
4t I he end ttl t jLlt l ni in Mi Tint 11 puM Mutt iLjth Ouf
uly
OOw CHEMICAL COMPANY
OUTFALL I 031
PROC.KASIES TO TITTAHAHASSEE' R. 031
PERMIT EXPIRATION] JO/79
1
1
i
i
1
1
!
1
1
1
1
i
i
1
1
1
i
1
I
1
1
UL
r'ARArV
NAME
LJNITS
LIMIT
OATt
•7-1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
IS
16
17
ia
19
20
-21
22
23
24
25
26
2?
28
56ifl01_
J Lnl(U>QOfl6Bj L56013B
COLIFORH-
L HF/l"
AVERAGE
<2Cfl '
1 DAILY AVG
1
C
1
L>
1
O
1
>16
FECAL'
nUL
MAXIMUM
HIGH
i
m
1
1
29 1
30
in
•
M
ONTHIY
MMAkt —
IU
GINNING u
UttiC 0* IE
1
1
/E«AG6
X MUM
MtJEM D
1
__[
L0\
l i
I
i
_1 ..1 E 1 1
1 1
1 |2
i 1-
-.1 -L-L _L_j__)_i
*v» REKJRIING .4
PUS TAKEN , .1,
. w»» vrt*
ATE
ft
_ j
• ?
r ij
i
c
00910
-
1
0' LY AVG
1
r
i
i
!
—
Ojlc (aim w<>
PART 1 - RETURN 70 DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES pimud 1 — **-
MIGI
VERAGI ' , , ,
AXIMUU. |,||
1 , , ! 1
'. E J 1 A ._
MftEH T^TS REPOHTlriG
LOW
l i
i |
' 1 !
1 Uf.llll' UNIJiH I'CNALlt C
1HA1 UAT.CD ON MY INOIIII
-.
1
9JL
- I
DAILY AVG
—
HIGH
LOW
VIRAGI ,, , ,
AXIMUM ,,,,,,,
II II
UM4IN OATS REPORTING
AYS EXCEEDING MAXIMUM
.°~"« III.
UUC PUNCH d> Ml
F IAW" IMArTt"tAVt~('T
r O^ TlfUM INfUVlOliA
I
1
1 I
IISONA
i, IMW
0
o
M
.0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
;
1
i
i
i
1
l
1
t
1
(
l
1
l
1
1
1
i
0 TO
AXIMUM
DAILY AVG
O
C
O
C
O
o
o
C
O
c
c
c
c
c
c
<~
c
c
c^
c
c
c
o
c
c
(.
c
c
0
c
6UVI
a
HIGH
SULi
LOW
1
1
«HACt ,,,,,, ,C
AXIMUM ,,,,,,,«
t > 1 J 1 1 1
UMBER DAYS REPORTING
OlAl SAMPLES TAKEN
"° "" ""-_ 1 1..I I
our rufiui i"it.
t*-
1 L
--
1
-
DAILY AVG
VERAGE
MAX
MUM
UMHER O
OIAI SAfc
••
HIGH
LOW
1 1 1 1 1 1 ,
II II
II II 1
1 1 1 1 1
PUS 1AKEN
.— .
DUP PUNCH (ft Ml
1
IWTAKF-
I
,
DAILY AVG
O
C
c-
O
c.
t
t.
c
•o
c-
c
t
c
C
C
o
c
c
c
o
c
c
c
e
e>
c
t/
&
c
c
-
CFi
...
HIGH
,
LOW
1
C
&
00 1
re>OJ«'M£ «?
towOo^W
I
1
DAILY AVG
£>
C
C/
c
c
t
e
c
c
c
c.
c
«.
c.
C
<-
C
t
t
c
c
c-
c
t
t
c.
c
c
C
c.
M»
nj>/
«:j
r-p**-e/e
- rF/
HIGH
LOrt
"'"»« 1 :O «VI«ACI , | , , , , LC
MAXIMUM , , , , , ,0 "««'«"" ,,,,,, ?
1 1 1 1 1 I 111
,J_J L.
'"Mi -
~~ n
UUP PUNCH !'>»•! I OuP PU»^H |U»«I
'
5
1O
15
20
Ju
11Y lAfvMINUJ AND AM f AMIL IAII V\llll llll If-Jf OMMA'IOH SUOMllllU IN llll'j DOCUMINI ANU AlE All ALII'/I Ti fS Af.i*
tDAItlY III LI UN'. llll t loll UUIA rjIfJO lilt IIIIUIIMAIlUN 1 HI 1 It VI IIIA1 Tilt IN OIIMAilO'l 11* I'Ml Aft_ul'AU A'iO
-------
< o -:
ftf ° °
F _i.^"
e
O
= ; - irs
(T 3 ^
< - 3 •= - I S
o^. •* — " c _ n
—£= _ - ^ S ; =
-21S 1— •« - c
-s. i
«
c 1
I
- c
a a.
•
«
t
V)
UJ
c
D
O
LLI
_J
: §
5 <
; o
3 ^
i 1
1 2
r 2
5 ^
i *^
a.
n
z rt
1 J Ci
1- -i>
b_±i
^
1 °'
? 0
'z o
- o
i 31
^ «r
^ c»
i~ *^
: o
tj 5,
P — ,
AJ
O1
•=Tl
O<
0
T
1-1
O
a
o
r-,
.-T
0
a
o
0
Oi
0.
b
c.
<
^l
o
t—
o
x;
S.
i >
3 O
trt "N^
i O
0 X
o
*?
o
J,
0 _*
1 -^
to o
o s:
S-
>—
2
5,
IT
LJ _
0 _l
V
-T (J
bj z;
i
^M
-^
O
1
O
o
a.
>—
0
0
^
O Q
CJ 0
s:
-E
_i
°-
uj W7
7 "
Z D
K.AXinun
9,5
z:
3
H 0
•-« o
X IP
t 5T
VtRAGE'
P0?0_ j
3:
o.
•y
X
*< \n
X ^T
UJ
(_5
-t
£
r- o
•< K%
•
^
-1
f!
i { DAILY AVG
o
o
| DAILY AVG
-
5
O
o
LY AVG
<
O
-
O
<5
1 DAILY AVG
-
i
X
O
X
LY AVG
<
0
6
r
r
«
a
-
5
->
o
*
o
DAILY A
-
"
'i
*-
„
^
?
^
1-
f
0
i
'J
o
•"
^
»
3
-
J
•
n
-
^
.
v
••
.
v""
X
*
-
r
^
o-
k~
a
T
to
~
V
>
r*
<~
T
0
J-'
7.
O
u-
v
^
ir
j
-
vj
~
[h
S
0-
3-
,„
~*
-
,
0
Irt
-
*
I,
;
±
7-
y.
~
>
T
-
V»
Cr
».
-
0
~-
>•
"7
CL
„
"
'-
o
-•
u
r.
_
^
^,
•~
to
r
t
>
v
:
_
•
o-
«r
*
.
i
^
C"
J
..
_
s
V
UU
0>
(N
„
c-
J
__J
,_
;•
I
?
1 — —
-
^
_
~
\
^
j
o
•4
"
x"
-^
3
;
7
o_
-
u
>
*-
-:
<
>
j
^
5
o
c
^
-
—
>
"
.
-
1
•;
^
5 °
\ *, ?
:- -i ^:
^•i ' i
j^j
< 3
"n i -r
^J3
IT -ij
3 a
D c
2
«i J
^ ! " -Is
-i ~ -j _
vTi : _ o
i "* ~i
J ^J j;
T^~!^
I 'I
^>l • -J
-1 . -1
"jiji
H - -<§
3 C
= »
; , 1=
*4 - -,00-
• i I
^:ji
4^^^
!« 5
! 1 3
r-l u
•1 ^ i*< _
rtl " "la
~1 1 ' ~
J ^ Is
i n j«
~j ;
"-! : ^
? i
C 4
M
Z
, <
1 -
z
;
o
1
X
*
vt
X
;
Xi
-
<
jt
n
, ,
3
i.
^
•*
3
y
z
5
r
o
* "•
I
~ , I
•i '
l' -
2 ?
< • >
"j:
-r '
0
^ ?
X . -
J i
T- -
—
^
2 ' -
—
1 -
5 ( ~"
5 | ^
- i ;
5!*
T* "•
-
4
i>
; >.-
: ||
1 •* <
^ «<
I r
" - 5
• r
r =
|^
: | ;
5 r
< •
5 .
: !l
j||
- :
^ .
\ > =
I <;
< ;
* ~ ^
r 3
a ~
>' r
a^_
"^ "»
3 -
:: 5:
v_
J 0 O
-------
DOW CHEMICAL USA
MICHIGAN DIVISION -- MIDLAND PLANT
NON-CONVENTIONAL/TOXIC POLLUTANTS — OUTFALL 031
TABLE 2
Monitoring Resul ts — July, 1984
Concentration
pg/1 Her
Phenol
2,4-Dichl orophenoxy
acetic acid
Bis(2-chloroethyl )ether
Chloroform
2,3,7,8-Tetrachloro-
dibenzo-p-dioxin
1,1,2,2-Tetrachl oroethane
Tetrachl oroethyl ene
1,1,2-Trichl oroethane
Pentachlorophenol
1,3-Dichl orobenzene
1 ,4-Dichorobenzene
1 ,2,4-Trichl orobenzene
Methyl ene Chi oride
2-Chl orophenol
2,4-Dichl oro phenol
Naphthal ene
1 ,1 ,1 -Trie hi oroethane
Bromoform
Chi orobenzene
Carbon Tetrachl oride
2, 4, 6-Tric hi orophenol
1 ,2-Dichl orobenzene
Acryl onitril e
2
ND(2)
2
30
11 ppq
ND(6.4)
ND(6.4)
ND(9.1)
ND(6)
1
2
2
60
ND(0.5) '
ND(1)
0.3
ND(6.8)
ND(7.0)
ND(5.8)
15
ND(2)
2
ND(4.5)
Sampl e
Date
6/26/84
6/26/84
6/26/84
7/16/84
6/21/84
7/16/84
7/16/84
7/16/84
6/26/84
6/26/84
6/26/84
6/26/84
7/16/84
6/26/84
6/26/84
6/26/84
7/16/84
7/16/84
7/16/84
7/16/84
6/26/84
6/26/84
7/16/84
Concentration
ug/1 iter
2
6
2
30
10 ppq
ND(6.4)
ND(6.5)
ND(9.1)
ND(5)
2
1
2
30
ND(0.4)
1
ND(0.2)
ND(6.8)
ND(7.3)
ND(5.7)
9
ND(2)
1
ND(3.8)
Sampl e
Date
7/09/84
7/09/84
7/09/84
7/20/84
7/01/84
7/20/84
7/20/84
7/20/84
7/09/84
7/09/84
7/09/84
7/09/84
7/20/84
7/09/84
7/09/84
7/09/84
7/20/84
7/20/84
7/20/84
7/20/R4
7/09/84
7/09/34
7/20/84
-------
DOW CHEMICAL USA
MICHIGAN DIVISION -- MIDLAND PLANT
NON-CONVENTIONAL/TOXIC POLLUTANTS — OUTFALL 031
TABLE 1
Monitoring Resul ts — July, 1984
Phenol
2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic
acid
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
Chioroform
2,3,7,8-Tetrachloro-
dibenzo-p-dioxin
1,1,2,2-Tetrachl oroethane
Tetrachloroethyl ene
1,1,2-Trichl oroethane
Pentachl orophenol
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichorobenzene
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Methyl ene Chloride
2-Chlorophenol
2,4-Dichl orophenol
Naphthalene
1,1,1-Triehi oroethane
Bromoform
Chi orobenzene
Carbon Tetrachloride
2,4,6-Trichl orophenol
1,2-Die hiorobenzene
Acryl onitril e
Monthly
Average
(Ibs/day)
0.3
0.002*
0.3
4.9
2.2xlO"6
0.2
0.3
0.4
7.4
0.1
2.0
0.3
Daily Monthly
Maximum Average
(Ibs/day) fug/day)
0.4 1.5
0.005* 3.5
0.4 2
5.9 30
2.5xlO~6 10.5 ppq
ND(6.4)
ND(6.5)
ND(9.1)
ND(6)
0.4 1.5
0.4 1.5
0.4 2
10.2 45
ND(0.5)
1
0.1 0.3
ND(6.8)
ND(7.3)
ND(5.8)
2.5 12
ND(2)
0.4 1.5
ND(4.5)
Daily
Maximum
(yg/day)
2
6
2
30
11 ppq
—
--
—
--
2
2
2
60
—
1
0.3
--
._
--
15
2
—
-------
i.i".
»,'
i
»«OOH CHEMICAL COHPANr
MIDLAi/D D1V
MIDLAND
48610
AOim NUM«I«~J in**! »UWM»-1 ju -MU „„„„,
s 63009 I L{U£Lyo0668J L56.0JL3B_
MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT FOR
llllS IS VUUH MUNI ML V IUI-UII1 f OHM * Oil
SLC IICVLnSL ilUE TOR (ICTUnw MAI I.
Pkjic couiiilou- dim iulimil two coi*iti el itui loim
• I Ihc end ul r^cli inonlli Tlin upon niuil u jch our
Ljniing olhcf by Id.- )0jh D/ Ihi- n.umti
PAHT i - RETURN TO DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
DOH CMEMICAL COMPANY
OUTFALL J Oil
PROC.HASTES TO T 1 TTABAHASSEE' R. 031
PERMIT EXPIRATION} 10/79
Dale form wat
pitnted
p K KT-1
L_61_/10/29_J
.
NAMi[CCLIFORM-FECAL
^_ hf_ _
AVERAGE I HAXIMUH
- — I i~i 1 .1 ,l.A _i
'UMUIM o* rl R(K)«linG H
— L 1 I
_L_i.i. L.l.J-1-
I AM AW/.NL IMAI IIIIIU All . ,
IMA1 1111 III Alll. !,l
H-
AMI , NA ,,. , 1 , ..... Ujll l-IIIAIHIIK, In, ,N, ..... ^.|,ON I Ml Ml VI I,, A, 1,,, „„ U,,MA , „,„ ,., ,,,,„ «,.„
IMLArgl KNAIIIl^ I Oil i,UHMII llfd. l/(J:,l nil OIIMAHOM, IMCIUIMNC, llll COi'-llllLIIY Ot
-------
DOW CHEMICAL USA
MICHIGAN DIVISION — MIDLAND PLANT
C
NON-CONVENTIONAL/TOXIC POLLUTANTS — OUTFALL 031
PERMIT 0MI 0000868
TABLE 2 - Page Two
Monitoring Results March, 1985
Concentration Sample
u g/liter Date
Phenol
2,U-Dichlorophenoxy
acetic acid
Bi s(2-chloroethyl)ether
Pentachlorophenol
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,U-dichorobenzene
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
2-Chlorophenol
2,4-Dichlorophenol
Napthalene
2,4,6-Tr ichlorophenol
ND(0.8)
3/18/85
29
2
25
ND(0.7)
3
ND(0.8)
ND(0.7)
ND(1)
ND(0.3)
ND(1)
3/18/85
3/18/85
3/18/85
3/18/85
3/18/85
3/18/85
3/18/85
3/18/85
3/18/85
3/18/85
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
3/18/85
ND = Not Detected
() = Lowest Detection Limit
* = Concentration Reported as Part Per Quadrillion
-------
•*l/-r< CHEMICAL COHPAHT
MIDLAND DIV
MIDLAND
MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT FOR MtxrcU 1985T
02
I Hfi&<<0
THIS is YOUR MONTHLY furom foni.i ton
SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR RETURN MAIL
DOH CHEMICAL COMPANY
OUTFALL « 031
i
I
i
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
i
1
i
i
i
i
i
l
f
t
1
T~ I (lAC'Ul* NUMbfft
UJ L5.6oooa_.
PAR AM
fJAME
UIMIIS
LIMIT
DAT6
3 " '
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
I pLUM^I NUMUIlT I [7Tl 1 All NUUBtft~J
J L) I O.Qj)OO.v) 8 J U.6013.S J
IIP
1
TEMP-HATER
F
1
i (DAILY AVG
r l 37
oT si
t3£
,
Cl 33
d._.3i
9 id 21
10 if i ty?
n |r| >J?
u Ici W*.
13 Cl W?
14
___ _
cl L'i
?T~ UTL~
is ici WT.
is ici M 1
19
r 1 U ~*>
jo |Ct _^5"
-21 ICI 3T
22 1C1, 3l
s< Ici K,
26 JCI 3B
2' ICI 3f
« ICJ 37
29 j |
31
JMHIT
Ut MAflV
GlhHPf.C,
h
!
1
UGH
-^ -7
i~7
\'f
JJ1
-",6,
h
t
zii
_K
—
__
-J
1
1
AVE RAGE |
JAXIUUM | ,
.1 L
|
1
li-
ft
i~
.1
1
Di LY AVG
-7S-JI
7S"l/ti'
TOOT
^•Jl i 1
yr
'r>
3.,-
a
«r
MO
^9
3
l
1
1 t
T i
01AL SAI'PIES TAKEN
AYS r Xff (UING MAXII
/C Mil \ »Ol
DATE
vuir.G DM i
J.
Qit
0 <3
9
1
if -7VS9
— _.
-,V*
I. J__
J
i
JlO
L. L
1 U"~
J ^>(O
i »
I
i
-VE
7585
HIGH
Cewp:
—
LOW
sik.
1
|
""^ , i , iTiS
"""^ i , , nrt
,0'IBE; 3AYS REPOR
JOT
*l ^;^PIES TAKE
(AYS 1 x:tf DtuG I/..
tx C
UUt PUNLII
.. i. i.
IVjO
j i
^'Ji JoJB
"-r:iQf
i)ii
1>l «4j
Plc.«iC complc c inrl suhmil two cop.ti ol thtv loim
rrn^r.hT^^rr''^ ww EXPIRATION, ,0/79
Dale loim was
PART 1 - RETURN TO DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES p.,nied
i
1
|
1
1
Amrw
_r
ania - Nitroaen
ia/1 Net
DAILY AVG
3. r
o.-/
2.8
i
•j
I
1
|
1
r-t-
9
ft
HIGH
•<»«po
'
LOW
'U
1
1 F-i
t s\o
/
\
AVERAGE
MAXIMUM
1 1 I I l3 1 . i'
l 1 l 1 i
t i i i l
a^
( I
1 1
VUI.'BEB DAYS REPORTING lOlft
OTAL SAMPLES TAKEN
AYS EXCEEDING MAXIMUM
VC
MAIC V
jOiS
1 1
01 1 i i l l l
DUP PUNCH t'* **i
(.inllFY UNUEH IIUAIIY Of LAW
IIIA7 llAbl D ON MV NOIIIUY Of 11
Solids -
ko/day
i
C
c
r
c
Dissolved
DAILY AVG
VJT^ /8<3
Tii" Q
Zi
V
f t ••<
River
'Available Cap'
ko/day
i
1
C
c
c
c
/•
c
r,
c
L
o
f2t>ort
700^
9^0^000
jy vvcx>o
7/6 "/OOP
rz77poo
6^7000
-
.Q^SQQO .
/r^zoco
«,$•
Z£J
MS
k7£
icec.
tujoa
4£OCL
»ooo
tV87100O
AVERAGE
MAXIMUM
7^;
"J"","
LJ
»
_i
HIGH
LOW
•
-
_L_1_
NUMCER DAYS REPORTING
pTOTAl SAMPLES TAKEN
DAYS EXCEEDING MAXIMUM
AVC
MAX VIOL 1
DUP ILINC
AND AM FAMILIAR WITH THE INFORMATION SUHMI1UO IN 1
ONbltHE FOR OI1TAINING THE INFOIiMAllON. 1 BELIEVE 1HAT
'iQiO
i .1.
i C
.i_i .
L J_ ' .J L.
l
Ti
in ••
IS DOC
HE IN
IIMEN'
hORMA
C, " A., 'u.r
81/10/29 __
_ _ ,
Ptiosphorus - lotil
mn/1
J ....
i
—
—
i
_..
_.
—
DAILY AVG
.3
. _..
AVERAGE
—
IMUM
HIGH
. ..
...
(^
.
r
j i j
L .
i ,C
i j_ i t i-
_i. i . i i
. L .L^J 1 I -
L OW
--
,^
^
-
-
>., li
1
1
1
NUMBER DAYS REPORTING J^J 1
IOTAL SAMPLES TAKEN 1 g
DAYS EnCEEDiNu I-AXIMUHJ j
.vc P/»» v.oi J 111
/
C
(
t/
5
10
15
20
'b
JU
UUP PuUCH 1 'i ••'
AND A\r AflACHMI NIS AND
ION IS 1HUE ACCOM ,11. AND
rui'JILIL 1 AM A'.YAHl A/IAT IMIHl Ah( Jfli/NIFICANT I'lNyvL
.LlllS FOR SUIIMIHING FALSE INI OMMAIION. INCLUDING THE I'ObSlllllllY OF I INE AND IMPRlSOrJk.il NT
-
-------
»«OOK .EPICAL COHPAKY
DIV
r.I
sj [$60138 I
MONTHLY OPE^TING REPORT FOR
THIS li YOUII MONIIUY miOIll ( OMI.I I OR
SEE nCVEIISE SIDE COFl nETUIUJ MAIL
Pli'jic complrii1 and luhmii iwu cwn'i L»( lltji loim
«l tlii' end el L'jch month. Tim t, »... I I I
DDH CHEMICAL
OUTFALL I 031
PROC.UASTEB'TO TUTABAHAS3EE R. Oil
PERMIT EXPIRATION: 10/79
Dtiit1 ionn
pnnitd
_61/10/29
I'AHArV
MAME
UNITS
i IMIT
DATE
-3'\ .
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
u
13
14
FLOr
1
C,
C
C
C
~cc
MGC
i£P
)NO
_
DAILY AVG
JT:T
2/ (f
rch
Cl
-i
?rc
// 9
r>i
i. 3
cl ^.o
c|
-PAiV
c| /j 9
ri
_V
/
/
?. 6
'37
50
UIT
HIGH
'5 ICl JV'.V' 1
16
17
18
el a
I 3*)
m
/OS
8
LOW
91 1
?T
1
QL
cl )oi
C <'5'
c 91)
C /oi
C 99
18
HIC
iETrtD
I
3
^H
Vr
V700
Jf// 1
*
1O5"0
r /7
1
MUM
7
LOW
1
VEHAGC , | , ,/
AXIf.iUM I 1 1 )V
1 1 1 1
1. !_. l l
UM8£R OATS (tCPOnriNC
OTAL SAMPLES TAKEN
AYS ExCtEOiNG MAXIMUM
G ».»"^ol [ ,
DUP PUNCH
lijtfiz.
iTjOjO
L_l_l_
i
_j
c'8
o,ts
|C
1
00100
'PH
0 TO
MAXIMUM
•9.5
i
C
c
c
c
c
c
<•
r
r
C
s_
c
y-
C
c
c
f
-
~L
c
7
DAILY AVG
V...2...
7 J
"f"/"
7 V
1«
MINIMUM
6,0
7J'
7V
2^
7.5
7 r
__Z.^_l7f.
7-S"
7 5
__^_y'
7 V
_2 -•/
7 fo
7.9
7- 9
__/•!
f.3
•?• 3
7.0
77
7. /
7 C
7 r
Vv
7.6
rf /
/. i_
f. «.
>.r
7^
7. 1
7 /
7 / 172
72 |
7 ^
Z2
"Z I
73
J .
10.
7 i
? I
?_'/
7 /
71
7 }
7 V
7 U
L7
:£«
2.0
ZO
7 0
7 ;
?Q
7.2
VERAGE | | | 1 |7j« l5"
AXIMUM . . .
MIN j ! ,
_i_i8i. i3
J L l.J
1 .1
1 J
UAtfllfl DAYS Ht/O«Ii'JC ^ ift
ATS ElCt EOi^C *'*»
c
"" Vl01 ..I i
DUP fUMCM
;;,:,'
i £-
,0
]
5
10
15
20
O
i cciiinr u7;oEri riNAirv OF LAW THAT i HAVE PERSONALLY EXAMINED AND AM FAMILIAR WITH THE INFORMATION SUBMITTED IN THIS DOCUMENT AND AIL AITAUIMINIS A-,D
IMA" BASED ON IJI< INQUIRY OF (HOSE INDIVIDUALS IMMEDIATELY RESI'ONSIULE FOR OBTAINING 1ME INFORMATION, DELIEVE THAT THE INFORMATION IS TRUE. ACC.URAIE ANO
lU.°IUL 1 AM AWARF THAT THUd .(fa ilGNIF K,iNT PENALTIES (OR SUBMlPirjC, (AlSE- INFORMATION. INCLUDING THE POSSIBILITY OF FINE AND IMPRISONMENT
-------
,. CHEMICAL COMPANY
M1DLAUD DIV
MIDLAND '-'I 16610
IIAOIIIV riuuiiK I [rtiiMii NuwilRI j»->»u NUMII«~|
l_56.40..Q4 I LK IMP. 086 B J [j60.1 3_B._|
MONTHLY OPLv'UTING REPORT FOR VAo-rcW
THIS IS YOUR MONTHLY RCPORT FOIIM FOR
SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR RETURN MAIL
Pk'iitc complete and iulimil two copies ot llm loim
dl the end ol each month This report rnuil rL'jch our
Ljnung ollicc by the 10th ol the munih
PART 1 - RETURN TO DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY
OUTFALL I 031
PROC.HASTES TO TITTABAHASSEE' R. 031
PERMIT EXPIRATlONj
10/79
Dole fo L L
' L 1 1
1 1
L..I 1. J .1 1
U*'B£R r-YS HEIOIUiNG
DIAL S-MPlES TAKEN |
AYSEx,i0,-,rp
fVCI-./NCH
1 1
J 1
-
1
—
DAILY AVG
HIGH
LOW
t
I
VtflAGE
AXiMUM
Ui.'flER D
OTAL SAK
i I i l
i 1 l
i 1 i
1
tYS REPORTING
PLES TAKEN
AYS EXCEECJINC MAXIMUM
1 1
ut'"
1
DUP PUNCH i's «i
OISEF
MAXI
0 '
i
i VAT 1 01^
0 TO'
MUMT
DAILY AVG.
o
a
t
i
0
0
o
0
c,
0 1
6
O
O
o
o
<
«
i
0
O
o
•VISULi
HIGH
LOW
o
0
o
0
0
0
n
AVERAGE
1AXIMUM
UMDER D
AYS EXCE
VC MAK V
01
1
i i ii
10
• i i i .1 t. iP
hYS REPORTING
1~1~
EDING MAXIMUM . .K
r PUNCH I" »il
1
—
(
DAILY AVG
1
J
AVE
tAGE
MAXIMUM
UM6ER O
OTAL SAh
HIGH
LOW
_L L J 1
' 1
i i l l 1 i
__1 L__L_J
kYS REPORTING
PLES TAKEN
AYS EXCCEOING MAXIMUM
*c M" vioc _L_i a.
1 L_J_
l__j_i_
i l
DUP PUNCH i'» §e>
Consumers Power
Intake cfs
• • r
DAILY AVG
o
o
Ck
0
0
o
o
o
0
0
0
o
0
o
p
0
0
o
p
o
rt
a
0
a
O
HIGH
,
LOW
i i
AVERAGE , , , ,
1 1 1
1
NUMBER DAYS REPORTING
OTAL SAMPLES TAKEN
AYS EXCEEDING MAXIMUM
~ — "*" VlOt _i 1. ^J
DUP PUNCH JJ» 1
_
L_
L_
i_JO_
1 1
1 1 1
•)
Consumers
Slowdown
i
-
__
Povlcr
c
fs
_L. _.
DAILY AVG
0 .
0
o
—
_&
0
-fl- -
a
.._.
0
o"
HIGH
----
lOi'.
—
0 1
Q ...
0
0
o
0
M
>
Q
0
J
o
o
o
o
—
a
o
o
o
AVERAGE
MAXIMUM
UMBER D
--
—
.
..:
i j i
L. J .
A .1
1 1-
AYS HE lOMMNG
-------
DOW CHEMICAL USA
MICHIGAN DIVISION -- MIDLAND PLANT
NON-CONVENTIONAL/TOXIC POLLUTANTS -- OUTFALL 031
PERMIT *MI 0000868
TABLE 1
MonUonng ResuHs - £ebruary^_1985
Phenol
2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic
acid
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
Chloroform
2,3,7,8-Tetrachloro-
dibenzo-p-dioxin
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethylene
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Pentachlorophenol
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichorobenzene
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Methylene Chloride
2-Chlorophenol
2,4-Dichlorophenol
Naphthalene
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Bromoform
Chlorobenzene
Carbon Tetrachlonde
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
Acrylonitrile
Monthly
Average
iibs/dayj^
.3
.035*
.7
5.5
1.7xlO"6
2.0
2.9
--
4.6
.6
1.2
1.2
5.4
.2
.7 ~~
.08
5.2
13.5
.6
14.4
1.0
2.2
.5
DaTTy
Maximum
(Ibs/dayJ
.4
.070*
.8
6.6
2.3xlO"6
2.7
4.0
—
7.3
.8
1.3
1.5
7.2
.3
1.0
.08
7.5
31.7
1.0
21.6
1.8
2.8
.6
Monthly
Average
. I 3/l]__
2
50
5
38
13ppq
14
20
ND(8)
32
4
8
9
37
1.1
5
.5
36
94
5
100
7
15
4
DaTly
Maximum
— i-9/il
3
88
6
47
17ppq
19
28
--
50
6
9
11
50
2
7
.6
52
220
7
150
13
20
4
Mass discharge measured at 031a
-------
DOW CHEMICAL USA
MICHIGAN DIVISION -- MIDLAND PLANT
NON-CONVENTIONAL/TOXIC POLLUTANTS -- OUTFALL 031
PERMIT tfMI 0000868
TABLE 2
Concentration
u q/1 iter
1
22
3
23
17ppq*
ne 19-
28
ND(8)
16
4
9
9
50
ND(0.7)
1
0.5
23
220
7
150
2
17
4
Sample
Date
1/21/85
1/21/85
1/21/85
1/21/85
1/23/85
1/21/85
1/21/85
1/21/85
1/21/85
1/21/85
1/21/85
1/21/85
- 1/21/85
1/21/85
1/21/85
1/21/85
1/21/85
1/21/85
1/21/85
1/21/85
1/21/85
1/21/85
1/21/85
Concentration
u g/1 iter
3
88
6
47
8ppq*
15
21
ND(7)
29
6
9
11
22
2
7
0.6
52
50
5
57
13
20
4
Sample
Date
2/4/85
2/4/85
2/4/85
2/4/85
2/4/85
2/4/85
2/4/85
2/4/85
2/4/85
2/4/85
2/4/85
2/4/85
2/4/85
2/4/85
2/4/85
2/4/85
2/4/85
2/4/85
2/4/85
2/4/85
2/4/85
2/4/85
2/4/85
Phenol
2,4-Dichlorophenoxy
acetic acid
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
Chloroform
2,3,7,8-Tetrachloro-
dibenzo-p-dioxin
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethylene
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Pentachlorophenol
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichorobenzene
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Methylene Chloride
2-Chlorophenol
2,4-Dichlorophenol
Naphthalene
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Bromoform
Chlorobenzene
Carbon Tetrachloride
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
Acrylonitrile
NO = Not Detected
( ) = Lowest Detection Limit
* = Concentration Reported as Part Per Quadrillion
-------
DOW CHEMICAL USA
MICHIGAN DIVISION -- MIDLAND PLANT
NON-CONVENTIONAL/TOXIC POLLUTANTS -- OUTFALL 031
PERMIT #MI 0000868
TABLE 2 - page two
Phenol
t!2Dli2![lD2 B£su1ts February, 1985
Concentration SaiiipTe"
2/18/85
2,4-Dichlorophenoxy
acetic acid
Bis(2-ch1oroethyl)ether
Chloroform
40
5
44
2/18/85
2/18/85
2/18/85
2,3,7,8-Tetrachloro-
dibenzo-p-dioxin
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachl oroethylene
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Pentachlorophenol
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichorobenzene
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Methylene Chloride
2-Chlorophenol
2,4-Dichlorophenol
Naphthalene
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Bromoform
Chlorobenzene
Carbon Tetrachloride
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
-Acrylonitrile
2/18/85
11
ND(8)
50
2
6
6
39
0.9
6
0.5
33
12
ND(5)
92
5
9
3
2/18/85
2/18/85
2/18/85
2/18/85
2/18/85
2/18/85
2/18/85
2/18/85
2/18/85
2/18/85
2/18/85
2/18/85
2/18/85
2/18/85
2/18/85
2/18/85
2/18/85
NO = Not Detected
M = lowpst OptPFtion limit
-------
1 t ;
i
. !•
}"
«
1 1
Ir
i
' I
,
• ' ';
]
i. i!
i
j
l!1
|(:
!j '
z..
jb i-
1 1;
IF
-Jf
K IDLAIID DIV
HJDLAM0 r,l XGfcflO
Jl
PARAM
NAME
UNITS
•
»cn/r
J.7
J
— —^
0
i
L 1 1 1 1-
l i l 1 1
_J_I_J-0_1_
PUST.UM' T
M?
J-.I .
Hrir
~. 1 I 1 1 1 J
DUP PIWCH m in
OOJ13
OXYCEM DEHAN-TOT
" HG/L " "
1
C
C
c
DAILY AVG.
IMl
i
IMl
z*?
137
G
c
c
c
r.
b=.
C
c
c
C|
1
z<»
15
JU
lOP
/OL,
/II
99
/07.
97
9^
"*o
^7
9
9
V
HIGH
LOW
<77
103
ii
c
c
cJ
AVf
UX
fVO
/
ra
Kef
171
_L-
'z.
(^V
/(tf
t>
MACE
MUM
•3
_i i i
..LJ j
_1_LJ
1 1 i
1
1
1
1
_l_l
1 1
AYS EXCEEDING MAXIMUM
VG «•• wot I t 1 r
1 J
1 .1.
OUr* fUWCH I'* •*»
70300
SOLIDS-D1SS-180C'
i
1
1
DAILY AVG
fSfij
rvry
f
1
SffZ
57^
1
1
1
I
SUB
J"JI£
5't/V(#
5-1/92.
AVf'AOl
MAXIMUM
OTAL SAfc
HIGH
Cotnf
LOW
\il-ft
1
i i iS,1
_!_!_! I/ 1
.J J_.J -1-1^
1 1 1 t 1
VC M.x v*pt | |
Ot
IP PUNCH .
-LJL.
IIS III
Wfl
19 [2.
J_ L.
L 1
I- 1
17030
•SOLIDS-SUS-NET
•' HG/L' " '
A
f3
i
f
1
VERACEI
0
DAILY AVG
fz. */
9. x
5 ^
0.9,
1
L
\
MAXIMUM
IS
HIGH
a,— ^
I
618
.8
( | jO
DUP PUTM i'i i»t
00100
PH
K
9
t
C
c
c
c
c
?-
~_^
£,
c_
C-
^*
p
c.
c
..
txi
,5
DA
0 TO 19
HUM T
ILY AVG
7. /
7. f
70
70—
6.?
(j 9
._.
C. 1
— "
-:
>o~ ~
7 /
7 f
7^/
?
7 o
7 0
"(, 1
" GJ"
70
70
7 o
7.0
7 0
7
o
^3
KlNIMUK
6,0
n.r.i
7. f
7.0
7..0
<* ?
fc.9
7.0
7.'
70
7J
7.J.
7 /
7 '
1,' .
71
7.0
7Q
7'f5
7.i.
7 0
7.0
70
7.0
70
C 7.0 |7./
>t
• Gt
HIN
u.-
[M D
C U.I.
0
1_ 1 i
l 1 J
1 _! .1
AYS At "T>«
.K 1 ,
-1 7.
l f?
l t
INC
:4
t_j_-
LOi
7
7 f
7 f
lit
7'c
?C
z.c
7t
7 c
7 (
. Q
?C
7.0
7 C
f * '
i.
i
_j
I
1 CISTirY UNDER PENALTY OF LAW THAT 1 HAVE PERSONALLY EXAMINED AND AM FAUfllAR WITH THE INFORMATION SUBMITTED IN THIS DOCUMENT AND ALL ATTACHMINTS A
THA", BASED ON MY INQUIRY OF THOSE INDIVIDUALS IMMED)*TEtV''ptSF10"SIBlE IOf( OBTAINING THE INFORMATION. 1 BEUEVE THAT THE INFORMATION IS TRUE. ACCURATE. A'
COk'IHE 1 AM AWARE THAT THERE ARE SIGNlWBANT PENAl^lUr F/MSUfMirtjNa.rAttE (INFORMATION. INCLUDING THE POSSIBllITT OF FINE AND IMPRISONMENT
-------
1 >
t,
MIDLAND OIV
Ml PL ANO
'I »06<|0
THIS is voun MONT MI vntiniirmnMion
SFE EltVEFlSE SIOE FOP FIETUFIN MAIL
DOH CMFHIC»L
OUTFALL I 031
PROC. HASTES TO TITUBAHASSEE' R. OJ1
PERMIT EXPIRATIOHj 10/79
«.
i'Hic'f,
'tl^
-------
•j
\.
•UUH lnc.rilt.nL
HIDUUD ftiv
MIDLAND
.•'I /I0610
LjU
fAC'l'r* HUM*CI» 1 iPIMM.t NUMfIN ~1 ! •' 1MI Nu'-»ll(0
569.0.0<1 I Lbinj»MB6_8J |JAQ138_
THIS IS VOl/fl MONIHtV ftf I'ttni I OHM f O't
SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR RETURN MAIL
Pk-iiie comiilclc and iuliT>H two copitl of Ihn loim
•t the end ol «*cli monlh Tim frpofl muu teach ou'
Lanung office by Ihs tOih of the month
PART 1 - RETURN TO DEFT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
DOW CI'fMICAL COMPANY
OUTFiU I Oil
PRDC.WASTES TO TITTAn*HASSEE ' R. 03]
PERHlT EXPlRATIONi
10/7?
D.ilt Ir-m
pr.nl.t)
ei/io/a?
PARAM
NAME
UNITS
LIMIT
DATE
2
3
i
5
6
7
e
9
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
s
9
20
-21
21
23
2<
25
31616>
COlIFORH-FECAl'
" ' HF/l&OHL'
i
t
L
DAILY AVG
t
1
1
I
0
MAXIMUM
100
HIGH
J3r«k
1
1
. 1
3 1
1
1
26
27 1
28 1
29 j j 0
30
31
MONTHly
SUMMARY
AVEHAGC
VAX'MUM
,.„_„„
MC.INIIIWG DATE
HIDING OATI
_J !_
_] J
1 J_
LOW
L_J|
1 1?
\ \s
,O.NG M.XIMUMJ j^jg,
101 1 I 1 I 1
biaJac
U M O O
IHJ
1
i
Ot LY AVG
—
_.
—
VI
AX
— —
HIGH
LOW
1
1
""; i i.-i
' 1 J L
l_l J J.
ufc'Bl" r»vs mron
1
till
_1 1_
._! t-
TIMG
7, 1
1 l
tt
vt >... ..« ~[ , L ,_ ! L
PUP PUNCH
Pt IR)
"
DAILY AVG
—
1
~
/
1
J
AXIMUM
u,,B!B-,
HIGH
LOW
1
1
i i i i i i
i 1 1 i I
i l i
I--LJ.
^Jj-M-J-
AVS EXCUOING MAXIMUM
VC M.X VKH. I , , ,
1...
1 1
J
OBSERVATION VISULl
. 0 'TO •«
MAXIMUM I
0 ' 1
i
DAILY AVG
0
O
0
0
0
o
o
0
o
6
0
a
0
n
n
a
0
0
^
0
0 1
0 ....
0
o
o
o
0
0
0
o
0
HIGH
LOW
1
i
0
VtRAGf , , , | 1 10
AXtMUM ,| || |0
1 l l. 1 ! J .1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1
UM W 1 , '-3 ! 1
AYS!«C!IOI»G HIAXIUU^ _, £)
VOM.XV.O, | , , L __, ,
OUP PUNCH yf» •»'
-
~
~
-
V*
AX
DA
T
LY AVG
HIGH
* AGE
MUM
^
"
LOW
1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1(11111
1 1 1 I 1 1 1
J -ULJ 1 j 1 -
1 L
Consutrers Power
Intake cfs
-
-
.._
-
—
!
T,
- J
DAILY AVG
Q
0
Q
0
O
c
o
o
o
Q
o
o
0
_0
Q
0 _]
o
C
Q
0
0
O
.. o
^
0
_ 0
o
0 .
0
T?
MUM
VG M»> V
._i_i_i
HIGH
LOW
t
1
_LJ_
_LJ
-L J...I.I .I.J L.
- 1 . L J -LI
• vs RETT KG
J_
™ — I 1 J J_L _J
nu" n'NCH c* m
Consumers Tower
Slowdown C
i
—
"
-
-
]
DAM V AVfi
0 _.
c
0
o
a
0
o
o
0
0
0
. . Q
C
o
o
c
0
o
0
c
Q
0
Q
0
0
Q
0
O ..
0
0
vliAr.t , , |
A1
MUM ^ j ^j
.1 .1
-III
HIGH
.._
— -
_ L l
- J J
1 1
,:,,' [
1 CEKIIFY UNHEO PIMALTY OF LAW THAT 1 HAVE I'EHSONAyLLY EXAMIIJED .ANL1 AM FA'.vyf/q WITH THE INIO"MA1ION S 'H\MTTEO IN TH S DOCUMINT ANt) ALL ATTACHMINIS
THAT. OASEO ON MY INQUIRY OF THOSE INDIVIDUALS IWinEDIATELY, llTsrpN'^'Ptr TO'/JIWIAIMING THE INFORM*' ON 1 BtllfVE THAT THE INIOK'/ATION IS IPL'F ACCUH01F.
COMriETE 1 AM AWAHE THAT THERE ABE SIGNIFICANT /JtBAlTIES 'tlt/^n!>yyj'''9J^ifl INFOnMATION. INCLUDING THE rOSS'BllirY OF FIUE AND IWrniSOMMFNT
-------
y y.
a. p^_
DOW CHEMICAL USA
MICHIGAN DIVISION — MIDLAND PLANT
NON-CONVENTIONAL/TOXIC POLLUTANTS — OUTFALL 031
PERMIT #MI 0000868
TABLE 1
Monitoring Results --January, 1985
Phenol
2 ,4-Di chl orophenoxyaceti c
acid
Bis(2-chloroethyl )ether
Chloroform
2,3,7,8-Tetrachloro-
dibenzo-p-dioxin
1,1,2 , 2-Tetrachl oroe thane
Tetrachl oroethyl ene
1 , 1 ,2-Trichl oroethane
Pentachl orophenol
1 ,3-Oi chl orobenzene
1 ,4-Di chorobenzene
1 ,2 ,4-Trichl orobenzene
Methyl ene Chloride
2-Chl orophenol
2, 4-Di chl orophenol
Naphthalene
1,1,1-Tri chl oroe thane
Bromoform
Chl orobenzene
Carbon Tetrachl oride
2, 4, 6 -Tri chl orophenol
1,2-Di chl orobenzene
Acryloni tri 1 e
Monthly
Average
(Ibs/day)
.4
.0004*
.6
2.3
4.8xlO"6
3.5
5.1
-__
4.6
.9
1.8
1.9
--
--
.3
.1
2.7
31.4
--
11.9
--
3.7
2.4
Daily
Maximum
(Ibs/day)
.4
.0004*
.7
3.3
e.ixio"6
5.0
7.7
--
5.8
1.5
2.9
3.5
12.1
--
.4
.2
3.3
54.0
2.2
18.6
.9
6.8
3.9
Monthly
Average
(ug/1)
2
25
3
12
19ppq
18
25
ND(8)
25
4
9
9
ND(6)
ND(0.6)
2
.5
14
149
ND(13)
58
ND(1)
18
14
Daily
Maximum
(u g/1 )
2
48
3
15
24ppq
23
35
--
34
7
13
16
55
--
2
.8
15
246
10
85
5
31
23
Mass discharge measured at 031a
-------
DOW CHEMICAL USA
MICHIGAN DIVISION — MIDLAND PLANT
NON-CONVENTIONAL/TOXIC POLLUTANTS — OUTFALL 031
PERMIT jfMI 0000868
TABLE 2
Monitoring Results --January, 1985
Concentration
u g/1 i ter
Phenol
2,4-Dichlorophenoxy
acetic acid
Bis(2-chloroethy1 )ether
Chloroform
2,3,7,8-Tetrachloro-
dibenzo-p-dioxin
1,1, 2 ,2-Tetrachl oroe thane
Tetrachl oroethyl ene
1 ,1 ,2-Trichl oroethane
Pentachlorophenol
1 ,3-Di chl orobenzene
1 ,4-Dichorobenzene
1, 2, 4-Tri chl orobenzene
Methylene Chloride
2-Chlorophenol
2,4-Dichlorophenol
Naphthalene
1,1,1-Tri chl oroe thane
Bromoform
Chl orobenzene
Carbon Tetrachl oride
2 ,4 ,6-Tri chl orophenol
1, 2 -Di chl orobenzene
Acrylonitrile
2
2
3
8
24ppq*
12
15
ND(9)
34
1
4
2
ND(6)
ND(0.6)
1
0.2
12
52
MD(13)
30
5
4
23
Sampl e
Date
12/24/84
12/24/84
12/24/84
12/24/84
12/21/84
12/24/84
12/24/84
12/24/84
12/24/84
12/24/84
12/24/84
12/24/84
12/24/84
12/24/84
12/24/84
12/24/84
12/24/84
12/24/84
12/24/84
12/24/84
12/24/84
12/24/84
12/24/84
Concentration Sample
u g /liter Date
2
48
3
15
14ppq*
23
35
ND(8)
16
7
13
16
55
MD(0.9)
2
0.8
15
246
10
85
ND(l)
31
4
1/7/85
1/7/85
1/7/85
1/7/85
1/2/85
1/7/85
1/7/85
1/7/85
1/7/85
1/7/85
1/7/85
1/7/85
1/7/85
1/7/85
1/7/85
1/7/85
1/7/85
1/7/85
1/7/85
1/7/85
1/7/85
1/7/85
1/7/85
NO = Not Detected
( ) = Lowest Detection Limit
* = Concentration Reported as Part Per Quadrillion
-------
\ I
••00V, C'IL»'.ICAL CIHII'AHY
hJDLJUlD D1V
56PJ04
f-' '10610
1.560138.
MON'IIILY OI'LltAIING lU.I'OH I VQ\\
iinr. t'> YOIIH Mii'MHt v MI i run i OHM l OH
src iirvrnst sioc ron »r nniu M/»t
l'll'.,-.f . I.I1,|,I.'H I '.Hi I Iv,rr |..<1 111 Illlt Ic.fl'n
kt l)ii- t-nd itl cjtli inonlh Tim nfxjit nn»\t ff»cti ou*
I dii'.iiii) oKn f |jy llif IDlli III lln iiionlli
TAUT 1 - nCTUHN TO OCCT OF fMTU/IAI (IfGOIJflCCS
OOW CIK M1C-L COMI'AUY
OUTFALL I l>3l
(•noc.WAJiur. 10 i n i/.n/n''
r.xpjn/.iiOHi
.nt ( n. oil
D..IC li.'.
PAH AM
NAMl;
UNITS
LIMIT
DATE
/- '
1
1
4
i
t
7
e
9
10
11
13
1]
FLOW
'
..._._
CO
MGD
•o
JD
1 ) DAILY AVG
(•
L
c
(
c
f
t
t
I
(
c
,4 f
15 It
16 |(
17
18
19
30
IJ-31
31
33
n
35
n
11
38
29
30
31
HONTMIV
,
(
^w
•^
^
...
( ' j t
? V «
w y
v/ 7
),'<.
y 1
(. ?
H 1
\. 1
JL 1
TiV
'/ "/
/
• 7
/F7
n : '
(
I
— l
/
/
/
,j
.Lk
C' L.
•> .)
7 a
50
UIT
HIGH
_
.* .i
?
i 'i*-! U
.
V
.'AX
T
_J^
— ^
RACE
IMUM
5 7
r
5
j ,
D*TS f XCUOING
BEGINNING DATE
ENDING DATE
—
i_i
LJ
_J
MA
I
IOW
00310
UOO-5
MG/L- rJ'f
1
l
1
^~
—
1
1
1
1
•
.
jilij^j
J-J-I L
X.MUM
1 1
ffe
J'ilil
j|c, y
M • 0 0 » <
-
1
\
Di LYAVG"
iy i-
i> 3.
'
(j <^
3 ('
^ a
'} i
3 3
t 0
HIGH
LOW
• "" "^ i 1
DUP PUNCH
-J_j_
m IBI
'i. i/.
£jj_i-2
I ..!_.
1- i)
1 1
0031J
OXYGEN DEMAN-TOT
" HC/L! " '
i
7L
c
(•
c
DAILY AVG
iV^
'W
S9
rf
»»
^TXAMIflflD AND AF\
IATELY jrVsPONSIBLE
117030
SOLIOS-SUS-NET
" HG/L' " J
A
;3
i
7
\
i
—
i
—
-
t
i
i
/ERAGEI
5
DAILY AVG
!' /
_/( -1
*. I
1 i". J"
/•V 1
UXH'iUH
US ' ' '
HIGH
t . J. ,
1
o
\^-D
^v
AVERAGE
MAXIMUM
i i
1 L
LUX)
X.J..
LO*
J>/l
—
—
1 1
.v« U»V V«. | | | | 1
DUP PUNCH mail
3
A
: i
i
-
—
-
--
"
3LH
' !_
/ER/
,6.3«
)S-SU
es/o
^r,E I
> 1
DAILY AVG
V i J
V / ''
,v
.'.i i
— -
— ?p— ^
-T-
( *
,(. >l
11 fit
MAX
'h'UM
:„-,«,»
(Y.~ : .
HIGH
—
...
—
—
J,'JH
7
IO,V
--
__.
—
---
,.
-.-.
._-
1
tt^^
-^ ;-,
lj '/
.l.JL-L.L 1_K - .
DAYS EXCUD'NG MAHW( ^|
1 r
n
yri-cM-H !'»»•
i_ .
l 1°
l. i .
00100
p
K
9
i
C
f
—
j —
r
-
^
f
0 TO
tXIHUM [f
,5 1'
^ _
-._^.'.r
_^2._
~ — -
' j i
/ / -
_,/ .
y ,
/
^ :
/ J
..^_i -
-4f;
12 v ."
"*/ J
**Cl j
i
:.v
SI -CM ' ' •• '
1 FAMIIIAH WI1H THE INFORMATION SUt'MITTED IN HIS OOCUVINI AND All Al 1 »t
IOS OBTAINING THE INFORMATION. 1 BELIEVE 1HAT 1HE INFORMAT ON IS TR'IE AL
F«\SE- INFORMATION. INCLUDING THE POSSIBIIITV OF FINE AND IMF'HirONWENT
«
If;!
ii°
'_/
._ t
7
^l
/ s
7
i i
i i'.
i i
"1
i i
i > •»
.• •( N r
I'lili
'UK
IO.V
7
. J
i
'1
7
V
I
'
>
i . ".
i.i/
i C
1
S * :0
AND
in
IS
j
11 C| T>"
4 i-
If^Wi^W
l!"!:
-------
ojii ivunivn jo win Oi Nunnn - i
UJ.IJ 3,.(J
bi/OI
*U 3T,',
llMH3d
I 111 01 S!lSfM'30!M
no i iiv iir\o
MOO
t)| ll^t )O ».llr(OJ IIArtl tlU»|lli PUP .lUlffuin? ^f
nvk-i limn 111 no i KII" r.n IA 111 i r:
UO I fJIIUJ lllO.OU AlHtNOVI IMl'JA SI 2IIU
0179017 It
OUYIUIH
(8bi *-•••—| UOJIUOclJU DNIJ.VUJcJO A'UIINOIAJ
AIO
AMVdHOJ
MQO»»
-------
MIDLAND
i'l 'I06'(0
I I fiitii~il» «|MM«~| frimill WWWli 1 p' ••'! >"""""
L?.J (.560004 _J I .HI 00.00868 J 15601JB ._
Tllf, f. VOIMI MONTHI V lit I'MII T I OHM r OM
srt nrvrii'.r r.ior run nr IHIIN MAII
I'tf .!-.'• CM'MpIrt? jIMll MlI'MMI IWt C'lllrti Ol Mm fonn
at the end ot trfdi monlh Tim rrpoil mull ir«h on'
I .iniing ollicc liy il"1 tOih ol Hit ninniii
PART i - nrrunw TO Drrr OF NATUHAI nrsouncis
DOW CHFMICAL COMPANY •
OU!F*U I OJI
PI'OC.H*3tl.S TO Tl T T AfitwAISf.E1 M. 031
PF.RHIT EXPlRATIONi 10/7'
8J/10/J9
cfi
i-ARAM
NAME
UNITS
TlMfT
DATE
i.
7
g
9
10
11
11
1}
14
15
16
17
IS
19
20
3!
23
74
2S
27
28
316
COLIFDRM-
" ' HC/J!>
1
1
1
|
DAILY AVG.
|
16
FECA
OHL'
HAXI
HIGH
,.
'
L!
MUM
LOW
/ 1
30 1
31 II 1
AVE«AGt| , , | , , | ,1
""'"KM
1 1 1 J .I..U
O»»S CKCCCDING M»*iMUM
P«Tf J /I 1,
,«,«io«, c,ib.<
1 1°
^|j' cT
_ — —
i
Dt LY AVG
-
1
-
1
' 1
AVi.AGE ' , ,
MAXIMUM i . .
HIGH
LOW
1
1 1 1 1
'II 1 1 t 1
' I 1 L I L
TOTAl S»V»ICS TAXEM
PU» »UNCM III It
-K-
_u
i
-
'I
DAILYAVG
i
~
^
AVIflAQf
MAXIMUM
HIGH
LOW
1 1 1 1 1 1
II III
1 1 1 1 1 1
"" """>l 1.1 I-L-
I"1"
i
_1
diSERVATIOf
, 0 TO
VISUU
4
MAX I HUH 1
0 ' 1
i
'
1
i
•
i
1
1
1
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
DAILY AVG.
r
o^
c
r
o
(
f
,
r
i
r.
c
0
t,
^
1 Ci
1 c
\
i
i
i
'
I
t
t
I
I
I
i
,
c'
fl
r
,•)
, .
0
C
A
f 1
CI
o
o
HIGH
LOW
-—
1
AVE1AGE , , | j | | |(J
MAXIMUM , , | , |Q
1 1 1 1 1 1 !
._! L_J_ L 1.
W« «!»!,. »..» T
.III
Ot'P PUNCH '»» «el
•
1
-
-
1."
DAILY AVG
—
AVERAGE
MAK'MU"
VUM.E.D
IVQ MM \
_L_i_J
HIGH
-
— •
_J L_
LOW
--
1 1
1 LJ.L
..L.J .J_ J. 1 .
1 1
1 J. J L L_| 1
,*S.1T.T,NG 1 J
"•"'*"" 1 I 1
-— °r-— -"3— 1 -1-
™_J l.J_L.I i
Jf ruNCM PS Ml
1 CER1IFY UNDER PENALTY OF LAW THAT 1 HAVE PEnSI/NALLY EXAMINED AND AM FAMILIAR WI1H 1HE INIOn^AllON
THAT BASED ON MY INQUIRY OF THOSE INWyllDIIALS /MMEDIATELY/IESPONSmiE (OH OBTAINING THE INFORMATION.
COMPLETE 1 AM AWARE THAT THERE ARE SIUr/HC/*T /EWAnitS ffX SUBMIT! ING /ALSE INFORMATION. INCLUDING THE
Consu
i
._
irc>-s Powpr
DAILY AVf,
- il-
t
O
f
1
(J
i
1~~
o
(.
(
i
L
f
<.
(
~~T
i
n
f
i
-------
\. i r...
DOW CHEMICAL USA
MICHIGAN DIVISION — MIDLAND PLANT
NON-CONVENTIONAL/TOXIC POLLUTANTS ~ OUTFALL 031
PERMIT #MI 0000868
TABLE 1
Mon i tor i no Results —December, 1984
Phenol
2,4-D ich lorophenoxyacetic
acid
B i s ( 2-ch 1 oroethy 1 ) ether
Ch loroform
2,3,7, 8-Tetrach 1 oro-
dibenzo-p-dioxi n
1,1,2, 2-Tet r ach 1 oroethane
Tetrachl oroethy iene
1,1, 2-Tr i ch 1 oroethane
Pentach 1 oropheno 1
1 ,3-D i ch lorobenzene
1 ,4-Dichorobenzene
1 ,2,4-Tr ich lorobenzene
Methylene Chloride
2-Ch 1 oropheno 1
2,4-0 ich 1 crop hen 1
Naphthalene
1 » 1 , 1 -Tr i ch 1 oroethanp
Brcmoform
Ch lorobenzene
Carbon Tetrach lor i de
2,4,6-Tr ich lorophenol
1 ,2-D i ch lorobenzpne
Acrylonitri I 9
Monthly
Average
(Ibs/dey)
.3
.001*
.6
—
2.9x10~6
1 .4
2.0
—
3.6
.2
—
.5
6.2
—
—
—
2.0
—
—
13.5
.6
—
.4
Dai ly
Maximum
(Ibs/day)
.4
.001*
.6
2.5
4.1x10"6
1 .6
2.1
—
3.8
.2
.2
.6
7.4
—
—
—
2.1
—
—
22.1
.8
—
.4
Monthly Dai ly
Averaoe Maximum
u( a/1) u( g/I)
2 2
ND(1.4)
3 3
ND(7) 13
12.5 ppa 16 ppa
8 8
11 11
ND(8)
19 20
1 1
ND(0.5) 1
2 3
33 38
ND(0.6)
ND(1)
ND(0.2)
10 11
ND(6)
ND(10)
71 116
3 4
ND(0.6)
2 2
w
Mess discharge measured at 03la
-------
C
DOW CHEMICAL USA
MICHIGAN DIVISION — MIDLAND PLANT
NON-CONVENTIONAL/TOXIC POLLUTANTS — OUTFALL 031
PERMIT 0MI 0000868
TABLE 2
Mon
Concentration
uQ/l l+er
1
ND(1 .6)
3
13
9 ppo*
10 ppq*
ne 7
10
NTH8)
20
1
1
2
27
NDC0.6)
ND(1)
ND(0.2)
10
MD(6)
ND(10)
116
2
ND(0.6)
2
itorina Results — December,
Sample Concentration
Date up/I i ter
11/26/84 2
11/26/84 NDC1.3)
11/26/84 3
11/26/84 ND(7)
12/08/84 16 ppa*
11/20/84
11/26/84 8
11/26/84 11
11/26/84 ND(8)
11/26/84 18
11/26/84 1
11/26/84 ND(0.5)
11/26/8^ 3
11/26/84 38
11/26/84 ND(0.7)
11/26/84 ND(1)
11/26/84 NDC0.2)
11/26/84 11
11/26/84 NDC6)
11/26/84 NDC11)
11/26/84 26
11/26/84 4
11/26/84 ND(0.6)
11/26/84 2
1984
Semp le
Date
17/10/84
12/10/84
12/10/84
12/10/84
12/20/84
12/10/84
12/10/84
12/10/84
12/10/84
12/10/84
12/10/84
12/10/84
12/10/84
12/10/84
12/10/84
12/10/84
12/10/P4
12/10/84
12/10/84
12/10/84
12/10/84
12/10/84
12/10/84
Phenol
2,4-Dichlorophenoxy
acetic acid
B i s(2-chIoroethyI)ether
Chloroform
2,3,7,8-TetrachIoro-
d ibenzo-p-dioxi n
1,1,2,2-TetrachIoroethane
Tetrachloroethy!ene
1,1,2-Tr i chIoroethane
PentachIorophenoI
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichorobenzene
1,2,4-Tr ichlorobenzene
Methylene Chloride
2-ChIoropheno1
2,4-DichIorophenoI
Naphtha Iene
1,1,1-Tri chIoroethane
Bromoform
Chlorobenzene
Carbon Tetrpchloride
2,4 ,6-Tr ichIoropheno i
1 ,2-D i chlorobenzene
Aery Ion i tr i le
ND = Not Detected
( ) = Lowest Detection Limit-
* = Concentration Reportpd as Part Per Quadrillion
-------
if!
I
COtif'AHf
KJDLAIID PIV
HIDUlID
r.; 10610
II.Y OI'LliAIING MU'Oin rOH
• ' ! I ', i"' >'•' """" "I'1'I III r III Mill I I Ellll.1 1011
" sf c nf vr iisr Mi>t ron iiniiiiu MAIL
''
1 pMinn Mi»«iii~| |ffi.urfr(;;Miii«
2_J L56CIJP1 I I MI000.0B
HID!)0_OBfre 1560.138
1'lv.iic ctmiiili'K- j'Ul luliinil U'i> ci>|i'U ul lltn \tiim
«l lln t-nd i-l t'jch monlh Tim IL(K>II ".uil iiich OMI
L,im»:;(0fl.n- lif Ilic l&lli wl ll'i niunlh.
PAJ1T 1 - RETURN TO DEIT Ol NATUMAL nESOUHCES
DOH CHCMJCAL C
OUTFALL l /
vr
s-i
Jj
7t.
I'1/
V)
/•'/
/( /
JJJ —
r
}
AVfflAGE , , , ,f j'r , ^
I.IAXIMUM , | | | |f iC.lP
f r i i I i
MUM* id DAYS AtPOHTIMG
TOTAL SAMPLfS TAKCN
OAYJ MCCfDlHC MAXIMUM
— " "• ' -
1 1 I"
OK* PUftCH 1" HI
•Jl"
i 1C
1 1
70JOO
SOLIDS-DI
' MC/L
r
i
(/V/,i
i
i
' / ' L
' f " .i
i _
1 ^1 f M
1
-L
-
r-l V "V
_^iti_
SS-1BOC'
-
—
—
—
- 1 ....
AVERAGC , , , Lf|(
UA..UUM ,,,,,'
, j
i_ i
1 1 1 1 1
MUMCtR DAYS HE PORTING
T~
—
i a^nry UNDER P£NALTV OF LAW THAT i HAVE .rensONAfy
THA" BASED ON MY INQUIRY OF THOSE INDIVIPHALS IMU^
COM*IU£ 1 AM AWARE THAT THERE ARE SlGNI^ANT p|(r^/
/OUT PUNCH
"jol'i
„»*{ , ,
1 1 1 1
17030
• SOLID
AVERA
30
1
1
—
L
L-
\
1
j\
s-su.
p J 1 (
GEl' [7
L
~^T
n.i.
ii .1
i "• \\
-^7--
AVtMACf
MAXIMUM
5-UET
UXII1UH
)5 ' '
^
, i i iir
•i
,liL
—
M
H iT
i i i i ii
i j_
NUMltH DAYS fltPO
L_l__i-
UmG
DAYS (XCtCDINC MAXIMUM
«-.« | , ,
_J_1 1
h<
. i°
i i
OUP PUNCH (M Ml
,17031
SOL10S-SUS-NET«rO
1 OAli V AVG
z
-
_
«l
ilir:
> •' V /
. . /..,,/
/ V 3 ,'
,7* •••
EXAMINED A«(h AM (AM LIAR WITH THE IN(OKMATION SUBMITTED IN THIS DOCUMENI ANU AH A 1 1 »L..~.. r, , ;, .r,^
(AULY msi><*SiuiE mu OBTAINING THE iNfORMATion. BEUEVE THAT THE iNfORMAiioN is i«ut. ACCUHAIE AND
&*aOyl»f(j TING fA/jSE- INfORMATlON. INClUOlNG THE POSSIBIIIIY Of FINE AND IMPRISONMENT
'•> I
-------
• «DOH CHEMCAL COHPAIir
(VK"'THLY OPERATING REPORT FOR
'
\.
;
•
>
!
i
*
i
J
\
\
*
I
\
i
»
>
i
i
1
i
1
1
1
t
I
1
\
i
1 i * i
' : '.f
.jil
i ' .'',,"
:• i } "
i ' ' •' I
* i ;• lit
;"' 1' \'ti
• ', ', Uu,l mull icach oui
1 .Hiiinil ullicc Ijy l ic IDlli ol lliv nioiilli.
U J 1 56IJ004 J InlOPOPOisJ L56pij8^_J PAUT 1 - HETUFIN 10 ULIT Of NAIUHAl HESOUHCES
IJAME
UNITS
I 1,111
"D'ATE
'J •'
2
3
4
5
7
e
9
10
2
4
5
._! J
i
9
~~20
21
22
2}
24
25
26
27
29
30
**
OHTMLY
TEMP-.KATER
i
,.
r
"
_i_
-v
'
•
,
L
1J
_i_-
|
A Jt
/A*
TOT*
DAY
• rt
D*l
N01NG DATE
'!' !
1
DAILY AVG
, '
',
-' i
< ]
1
HIGH
jj
LOW
J
cot;:
i
t
1
1 1
1 1
i
• / i i
J
•
«ACf
^~
jlj
2J
-t-
j:/
,i -
'/•/
n±fjt
'n !«-i
.1—1 -1 1-1 -L-± .
risV-oJl^o1"! A"
I SAMPiES IAKCN | ! t^
txCttoi"C MAXIMUM] , ,
MiJ V
(
_ 'i
5U_i
1 ,
1 ^_i
ILJ
)
I]!
iJ^ o ~o
1
" 'i
1 r 1 1
T T
II
li
i|
l
_L
lj.
-v£
0»
7
n
UCT
o&
IV
R-
95
ITY
DHH
1
LY AVG
't
0
— r-
_£ikic—
HIGH
: — 4-
fl*C:
.UMfltF
IOIAI SA
JAYS Ik-
*WC ULI
j
LOW
AYS nironiiNG f( > | y
ri
V.W
15
1AKEN '
V °,
fc1
J_L.
1 1
our futicH ni tit
1 Ci^
THAT
CQt.'?
51 :f
t1 ;i(l
l'':''V
TlfY
OAS
LETE
SiC
!,'{
ft
1
UNO
ED (
1 A
VAlu
if!
w
Amnonia - NHrooen
mo/1 Net
i
l
i
i
J
1
I
DAILY AVG
1
0 1
O,'-/
o.s-
HIGH
~T
LOW
lf.-
|
AVERAGE , ( , <' |, j 7
..AX.MUM , , , ,/^iJ
II 1 1 l_l
JUM»£R OAVS HETQ TING [(_• 1 ^
OTAL SAMPLES TAK
OATS EXCEEDING MA
iVfl UA1 VKM. [ ,
DUf PUNCH
tH rttMLTY OF LAW THAT 1 1
3N MY INQUIRY OF THOSE INt
vl AWARE THAT THtHE AK£ S.K1
It 01 CIHTIHIOOfl«ATO«^Yrn
itT.'o'iiciiinniuiHMii'tii
I i7^1l ! \ h nlUlrv'i '(• 1
H &
"H i_u
01 MI
IAVE r
JWIOU/
MriCA
-^
N-T.
Solids - Dissolved
kg/day __ . jjet _
. .
1 DAILY AVG
f" Ifi . (t
( ' V V I T
( Ku, V ' V
c _Y' i
:-hr
C (/ -
c
' 1 )
-T-^
''I±i
C Vc J
1 ' "/
- ' ' \
X4.L ; t
Ji_'_/_^_(n_
f j f "^
Al'-'
.,. ^ ' 3
In
I v.'
.«)/
AVERAGE
NUM6IH O
HIGH
.
LOW
^
c
c
/nJ
|.
/v
.LI
( j
V/
•?
: ?sV'7
1 j. 1 V
/J-L
!• v ~r
"s t
1 "• , *
/ jVi
""*"
JMAER 0
_L_
HIGH
1
J 1 i/ L
1 J LJ-- L
AYS REPORTING
)FAL SAMPLES TAKEN
*YS EXCEEDING MAAtfc*UW
C MA^ v>ot
1 1 1 1
LOW
.
-J-- L.
\3<
_l Lt
_L_1
OUP PUNCH l)i»»l
AR WITH Tt
TAIMNG TM
JFORMATlOO
1E INFORM
E INFORM
. INCLUDE
River 'Available Cap'
k'l/da_y
L
•
—
-
-
AVE
>.'A»
DAILY AVG
iL'ln't
1 If Ml 3
j an/'/
~I ll i i •)
~i&fk.
1 ^ V ' ' • x
HIGH LOW
'~n
. —
— . —
i
i
i
J!'UM L/I '-aihZ±.C.
_J 1 .1 _l -1 -1L
^'•e(R DAYS H(rO«TtNG \f )5"
TOTAl SAMPLES TA*.
"' "" VI1X_I J
"M"^ i i
_!_!..._.-
DuPPUt.CM II14H
.
Phosphoru
mn/1
i
L
AVE
>OT
bo
F-
DAILY AVG
-
s - 1
HIGH
_._
_ .
"*' ..1..1..J -O>
""""" _ 1 1 J L- i .
J L-l 1 1
I_1_J L J
Our PUNCH
otal"
1OA
;_
;__
i
i
1";
•v .. i.
t'."»"\ l
-1- 1 J
111 »«r
A1ION SUBMITTED IN THIS OOCUMENI AND AIL ATTAtHMlHii ' '"
MION. 1 BELIEVE MAT THE INIORMATION IS IRUE ACCUIlAli A JO
G THE POSSIBILITY OF IINE AND IMPRISONMENT.
-------
(
v. i
•
if-
-•DOH CHEMICAL COMPANY
MIDLAND DIV
MIDLAND '•'' «66«0
,„-„„-»,-,.,. I (.,«. *«.. —I !-.--.«, «»«.-j
56(001 J ( r-HOVOOB&S J I 5601 Jp I
;HLY OPERATING RLPORT FOR
>ltS IS VOUH MUNIHLY HCrOlU * OHM I Ofl
SEE I1EVCIISC SIDE fOII flETUMN MAIL
Pkju- loiitpltie ••'"' «if»nm uvo toinii ol ihii loim
jl ihc end ol cjcli iniiiilh Th.i upon nmil n jch out
l.intiliijulliiFliy ll"1 lOlhol U» lliiinlli
PART 1 - IILIUflN 10 Did Ol NAIUUAL HtSOUIICCS
DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY
OUTFALL I OJ!
PROC.HASTES TO T I T T Afi A WASSEE R . OJ1
PERMIT EXPIRAT10NI 10/79
. . ... J
I'AMAM
NAME
UNITS
LIMIT
OATt
. 1
2
3
4
5
e
B
9
10
II
T2
13
14
_!L
19
20
-s-
24
25
26 J
-J
30
*(
COL1FORH-
1 | DAILY AVG
L
l
i
i
1
J- _ -
/ i i
\
\
i
i
i
i
i
i
_J
-i . . 1
Mi, juHijM . ^
..- LI
1 61
FECA
OKL'
MAXI
HIGH
1—
1
rrri
L i_ L
L_U_i_
L'
IUM
tow
i L
i i 1 1 l t l
NUMBER UAfS RtKJRIiNG [ f{
TOTAL, SAMMIES TAKEN [ ( ^
DATS txcUDiNC rtxir-'unf j j6
B[GiM«WCO»T£ if I ,'t
1 — M — *•-
'-V
W M D 0 T T
1
1 D* LY AVG
1
"T
' 1
HIGH
I_I_J-
1 1
1 1
LOW
l i
1 -t_l 1 1 1 1 1
lu'.'StH TATS R PORTING | ,
IOTAL S*\"HES A»-tN 1 | j
IAYS EKC!!DING MAXIMUf.^ | |
'"- "" ""• 1 1 1 1 1
PJP PUNCH I'S «l
CtRlltr UNDER PENALTY
THAT BASED ON MY INOU
COMflETE 1 AM AWAHE TH
1
AV
MAI
DAILY AVG
•
RACE
IMUM
1 1
1 1
1 1
UGH
.
L_l 1-
i i
LOW
r
II 1 1 1 1
NUMBER DAYS REPORTING 1 i
. 1 J
TOTAL SAMPLES TAKEN j ( |
DAYS [XCEEOING MAXIMUk^ | |
OUP PUNCH llt«tl
OF LAW THAT 1 HAVE PERSON
BY OF THOSE J'llJIVIOUALi IJ/
AT THERE Anf(^BNIFICAl«r Ut,
OUSER\
0
M
0
i
i
T
i
L
1
,
i
1
1
1
i
i
1
i-
I
1—
AVI
UlM
DA1L
C
_.
.
HAGE
IMUM
(ATI ON
TO '<
UM'T
Y AVG
A^
f
I
. J_.L_
1 1 -
VISULi
HIGH
U 1-
-1.1-
NUMBER DAYS FU POUTING
101AL SAvriti f AKIN j
OAVS EXCtEUiNG -VAXiMuKJ
iow
I
L .
i if.
j_ji.
s
1 ? ,>-'
/ UUP PUNCH t'* B*
«\LV EXAMItJlO AND AM fAM
.ItL'IATELY yfllsrON^miE KJR
ALT lib fO/y SUQMiniNCj lAlSC
1
AVE
MA
DAILY AVG
RACi j j
IMUM 1 L
_L _L
HIGH
1 l_l-
1 1 — l-
LOW
1 l.
1 1
NUMBER DA^S REPOflTING [ L
TOTAL SAMPLES TAMN j , ,
DAYS f KCEtUING MAXtMU^ , |
OUP PUNCH l)i*»l
LIAR WITH THE INFORMATION
OBTAINING THE INFORMATION
/^FORMATION, INCLUDING THE
'
Consumers Power
Intake
1
i
l
i
AVf
• - J
DAILY AVG
r,
r
/
f'
i_L
i
<.
i
i,
("
flAut
IMUM
_L 1_
- J--J -
1 1
HIGH
1-1 -I
1 L-t
1.J .1
1 1
NUMBtfi DATS HtPORTtNG
10'Al SAUFl IS 1AMN J
DATS {XCUDlNG MAXIMUI^
cfs_
LOW
1_ 1C
.1 J
J-_l_
Our PUNCH i'* MI
SUBMIlltD IN THIS OOCUMEN
BELIEVE THAT THE INFOHMA
possioiLirv Of FINE AND IMP
(
l
I
:
.bns
81m
OAll
^
jmcrs
«do«n
"T
Y AVG
' /
r
f '
o_l
J-L-
i '^
^ .
.1 -j.
f'ower
c
HIGH
'
""
ET«
1 L 1
11 1-
NUMbER OAVS KC^^^'ING
IOTAlSA"PllSTA«iN J
"' M" V>01 I 1 1
fs
LOl'.
1
fe:
1 L
1 . i
OUP PUNCH 1'* ••
AND ALL AHACHMI MS AHO
TlON IS TRUE ACLUKME A'(O
Hr ON WENT
'5 |
mm
r" ; i ;. J i ',
wm
ci«iuiuii
-------
DOW CHEMICAL USA
MICHIGAN DIVISION -- MIDLAND PLANT
NON-CONVENTIONAL/TOXIC POLLUTANTS — OUTFALL 031
PERMIT #MI 0000868
TABLE 1
Monitorina Results —November,
Phenol
2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic
ac i d
B i s(2-ch1oroethy I )ether
Chloroform
2,3,7,3-TetrachIoro-
dibenzo-p-dioxi n
1,1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
TetrachIoroethyIene
1 ,1 ,2--Trich loroethane
PentachlorophenoI
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,4-Dichorobenzene
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Methylene Chloride
2-Chlorophenol
2,4-Di chI orophen I
Naphthalene
1 ,1 ,1-Tr ichloroethane
Brcrroform
Chlorobenzene
Carbon Tetrachloride
2,4 ,6-Tr ichlorophenol
1 ,2-D i chlorofapnzene
Aery Ion itr iIe
Month ly
Averaae
(Ibs/day)
.2
.028*
.4
1 .2
1 .Ox10~6
—
1 .0
—
3.1
.1
—
.3
5.5
—
—
—
—
~~
10.9
—
—
Dai ly
Maximum
(Ibs/day)
.3
.054*
.5
1 .5
2.0x10~6
.5
1 .3
—
4.7
.1
.2
.3
7.0
—
—
—
1 .3
_ —
15.4
.5
.1
__
Mon+h I y
Averaae
W'l )
2
ND(1 .8)
3
9
12.5 ppa
ND(7)
7
ND(8)
22
1
NDC0.5)
2
45
ND ( 0 . 6 )
ND(1 )
ND ( 0 . 2 )
ND(7)
NDU)
77
ND(2)
NO ( 0 . 7 )
ND(2)
Dai ly
Max imum
(uc/n
2
—
3
q
1 6 ppa
5
8
—
29
1
1
2
64
—
—
—
12
—
95
3
7
—
Mass discharge measurpd at 031a
-------
DOW CHEMICAL USA
MICHIGAN DIVISION ~ MIDLAND PLANT
NON-CONVENTIONAL/TOXIC POLLUTANTS -- OUTFALL 031
PERMIT AMI 0000868
TABLE 2
MonitprIng Results — November, 1984
Phenol
2,4-D i chIorophenoxy
acetic acid
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
Chloroform
2,3,7,8-TetrachIoro-
d i benzo-p-d i ox i n
TetrachIoroethyIene
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Pentach1orophenoI
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichorobenzene
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Methylene Chloride
2-Chlorophenol
2,4-Dichlorophenol
Naphtha Iene
1 ,1 ,1-Trichloroethane
Bromoform
Chlorobenzenp
Carbon Tetrachloride
2,4 ,6-Tr ichlorophenoI
1,2-Di chlorobenzene
Aery ion i tr iIe
Concentration
ug/l iter
2
ND(1 .9)
3
Q
8.9 ppa*
ne ND(7)
8
NJpm
29
1
1
2
25
ND(0.7)
ND(1)
ND(0.2)
ND(7)
ND(8)
ND(3)
95
3
ND(0.7)
ND(2)
Samp 1 e
Date
10/29/84
10/29/84
10/29/84
10/29/84
10/22/84
10/29/84
10/29/84
10/29/84
10/29/84
10/29/84
10/29/84
10/29/84
10/29/84
10/29/84
10/29/84
10/29/84
10/29/84
10/29/84
10/29/84
10/29/84
10/29/84
10/29/84
10/29/84
Concentration
u g/t iter
1
NDU .6)
2
8
16 ppa*
5
6
ND(8)
14
1
NDC0.5)
2
64
ND(0.6)
NDC1)
ND(0.2)
12
ND(6)
NDU)
59
ND(2)
1
ND(2)
Samp 1 e
Date
11/12/84
11/12/84
11/12/84
11/12/84
11/05/84
11/12/84
11/12/84
11/12/84
11/12/84
11/12/84
11/12/84
11/12/84
. 11/12/84
11/12/84
11/12/84
11/12/84
11/12/84
U/12/84
1 1/12/84
11/12/84
11/12/84
11/12/84
11/12/84
ND = Not Detected
( ) = Lowest Detection Limit
* = Concentration Reported as Part Per Quadrillion
-------
lMi^iili^ ; ., • -
'vs.:-
C»ICt;ICAL CUI'.PAHY
K.JDLAtiD DIV
r.l 40640
HI 00 0.0.8<>R
j I:*, it AII wuvtiinn
MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT FOR
mis is VOUM uoiviitiY ruiom runu ron
SEE IIEVEIISE SIDt FOH HCTUIIN MAIL
Pkjic ci»ii|ik'li: jnrt tulMiin iwu cu|i.i-i uf ilut luifn
«l (lit end (>l L.*ch month. Tint it|tuf t niuti u-«ch oui
(-..1111,9 oilILC by ihc lOih ul ilic- month.
PART 1 - RETURN TO DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
V. [
• f
DOW CHEMICAL
OUTFALL I fi3l
PROC,WASTES'TO TITTAGAHASSEE: R. 031
PERMIT EXPIRATION! 10/79
DJIC loirn wjj
pnnlcd
I Tl M. !>.,
I _-6>/>0/Z'»._
z
o
D (
1
5C550
FLOW CONDUIT
i
i
(.
-
<.
L.
^ \
^
( 1
1
DAILY AVG
--
—
f
*•
1
J'-'r
V3 '
; c
^L-L_
j_L
' 7
^ )
f 1 if i
: 1 / ? . /
( \
i-!
/
/
t 5"
•"
.' 1/7 '
jj
vJ
J.Li
^1
,. l
i 1
, i
( r
U 1
ITT
c 1
AVI A
'•>
/>
;
J
/
1
;
1
»c,t
*-'***MWM
_
IblAi -.A"
"*>i t *tl
•. 1 1
i.2.
-
; ;j
^ (.
•
1 f
< ^
/ •-/
L.l_
V >"
i
j_
HIGH
LOW
00310
DOD-5
MG/L- N<<
i
-
—
L
\
1
L
l
D^
LY AVG
H
j t
i
_L
C
'i
HIGH
LOW
C*.,,, tot, \<
1
i
1
—
i_i
i l
*
_alU
i.i
! 1
l
1
i
i^-ifc
-i.-l L..J..1.-1..1_
1 1- 1 1 _J
Ats i.t (X) It li'«G
» u s i AAI n 1
T""
fc'AX
1
ft'
1
IMtll.l]
1
'|l
/ ' . /
. i
l i
i
: -.7
* i
; o
— CTM —
-VLRACi
)A A
U\t
»c,
1
"
'" ?
' •>
ii i ii .,e
.i±l
i xu
III', IAHI
1 1 1
J^i5r
a j..
_1J_J . 1 -
rv '?
(xlil OinC A\AA•(_,
'"7
(j /
7o
t/ !T
LJ
HIGH
LOW
-r 7
7c
(/?
; 1 dl
C
h
*~
T:
^
c
'-
c |
-j-
C V
C 7
_. /L.
(.7
59
.. L--/
L 2
(, i
i
I
i
I
I
1
1
/" 1 1
vifiAGE , , ,(,,;, ,(,
AXlWUM , | | | |^|C
1 111
1 1
i i i i i _ i
U'.^Bf H DATS Hi ORTING
UIAL '.,/ lAI'IIS 1AKEH
Ar:
,\ i
l',ii
, iC
"•' . "I'L "^L"'IUMI .LJ.
-" "•* ' i i i i- i ,
(<(>' *'Uf*f il I/* *(f
AW IHAl | MAVl I'UISUIJ/
'70300
SOLIDS-DIS5-1BOC'
i
DAILY AVG
1 <-/?9^
/
i
/
HIGH
LOW
Ci.niDtCl 1 t
^.B^Lo
L/ 3 J-f,
T
C Hi
1
l
i
1
i
1
i/D/ i j
I .I W f
S"o^X
V/*.?
5
VST2
*!'{%.
L
AVERAGE
MAXIMUM
t
y/(.c/
i i^ lyiYi^j'i
, , , ,5'ii LY" CXAMINCO' A>»O "AM f'Aivy
47030
•SOLIDS-SUS-NET
" HG/L' ' "
A
;3.
1
—
1
l
VERAGEJ
DAILY AVG.
27.1
36.3
I'f.S"
'il.l
T"
/
I
1
_J_
")<;.§
'8-?
<~\*l -j
.H i
/<£• 0
'. 3
1
VEHAGE
1AXIMUM
UMBER 0
OIAL SAI
MAXIMUM
HIGH
f,..
LOW
JC.--V.
r
I
, i i |2|3|.|C
^-LXjlil^t
-1..L I .II.
AYS RtrORllNG
. L
II iC
I'USIAMU _jljC'
VC MAX VIOL 1 .
our ri/m M
IAII Wllll IIIL U
-L_1_J_JL_
m Ml
JIOIIMAIION i
•47031
". "'LBS/DAV
AVERAGE'
: OS-jo
i
—
DAILY AVG
HC-C1?
UXIKUM
19137
HIGH
3*11
ITSf
2Vi7
— -.j
Tf
•277%
•yil yf
(c / "3 J"
.)
. 1
/Mi"
/y/
AVERAGE
IAXII.UJM
IOW
1
1
, i , ,3
,., , fc
if»|il
1 1 1 1
UMOER DAYS REPORTING
OIAL SAI.trilSlAI.lN
VC MA* V
It
AJUMII 11
* . 1 1 1 I
jf ruurH id
u IN inrj ui
j J
1 1
|l,c
-J-L.
1 I
ti
JI.IIMIIJI
00400
•PH
0 TO 14
MAXIMUM
•9.5 '
i
f
c
t'
c
r
,-•
^
(-
(•
i.
(
t-
,-
-
,;
v
(•
(
(
C
DAILY AVG
-j 1
J' C,
X 7
Y" 7
V I.-
i Ir
V 7
f L
f (.'
) (,•
1 /
,V I"
y ?
V (.
V 1
.f '2
? J
•,• i
KlNIKUK
HIGH
\' ^
>( ,
9 C
F f
>' u
X 5
>• j1
N |
* If
^ .-
i '1
^ 'I
•' "/
; i
;- j
i' •)
V ''
p •/
J V If •'/
? y
? V
'/ >,
ti
c> c
y y
(i J
V7
V J
/ /
V /
7 J
V /
•V '
/ c.
/(
f ^
V li
LOW
3 L/
V f-
y/
V ''
^ j
•- 1,
j s-
^v
j1 i'
7 7
r i
, t
'r ''
.' J'
i'. 1
I.'
,! J
, L
' 7
,• 7
, 7
f ,
Cj f
V 7
f 7
\ t
''(.
i ^
'< 7
AVERAGE , , , , ,f.,. ,$'
1AXIA,UU , , , , t /|. | |
MIN , i j
t 1 1
lUMaEM DAYS n(l^>H
OlAl SAMI'llS 1AKI
_»-£
i i
1"*!"
ATS net ibtttG v.*rt>Mitj\
OS.
Af
MX* VrtX j j
OUF fW'CM
U AIL Al I AC
.1 1 I.i il l.C
j-i -
in <«i
ll/IIJI
1*J '
i J^-
5
10
IS
20
i
P
L
25 t
30
•(. ,
<^
)
i
v. i
H
j n
LJ
0 I1
1
,1 ''
((
U _ *
\(
-------
*OOH CHEMCAL COMPANY
MIDLAND OIV
MJl'LAfJD -I flfl&ifO
1 TfACtklTr MUMbt* j 1>1MM>1 NUMbfJII JO.TIAU NUMBIA
J[5&000«..J LlIfi.QflQ86lJ '.5601 ?8^_
f ,1
*J« - •
MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT FOR
IHIS IS VOUH MONTHLY RtronT f OHM I UK
SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR RETURN MAIL
Plcaic complete und submit two copies ol this loim
bi the end ol t*ch month This rL'iuirl must nach our
Laming ollice by the lOthol the month.
PART 1 - RETURN TO DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
l98-<
1
02
• 4<70 ••• I II
*D)too
DOH CHEMICAL COMPANY
OUTfALL J 051
PROC.HASTES'TO T ITTABAHASSEEi R. Oil
PERMIT EXPIRATION! 10/79
Dale loim w«
printed
p.£to oTT
LJ.1,£10Z2*
z
o
rs
TE
-
. OO.C11 | 00095
TEMP-HATER
f:
1
ll DAILY AVG
L J_ I
<- V V
l/ V
-. . '/£
VI,'
V i'
i>"
^ 1 V )
"••'(,
' . 1 ! V 7
r
i
!
; -
• | l; >'
V
V(
1 '/
— -* TT
V'
- --'
; -
> i i
_
'_ .
v 1 i-L
ii .Li*
HIGH
'"1
'S~
V 7
V?
y^
vc
ii -r
.itk_
•n
v V
1 v.5
i'/
7T
LOW
COI.'3'JCTIVITY
MICR-OMH
t
1
1
II
1
i
1
1 1
[ 1
f
0*'LY AVG
-7 c -, 1
[_ -/5 7
72f7
7f7s>
1 1
''• I
7?r
'J 7
':' '
*• ' ' i
1' . I
. - .11 _
1 ^ '
-, i
H Y
--
, '
. '-
J
. X.
i
•. / I
1 i '
J -.U_._
-i-Ii
s. l; / ..
>^|HAU( ^
"•""""' 1
1
1
I-' I-IM I.-.YS h,
*1S 1 »l IIOIM.
"-All
i .1
I j
AAJ
WAX
i
-'!
/L
;f/
lii
ii.G
' 1
,UM|
1 .
1
1
1
1 1
;
1
1
1 1
1
i
L
^Vtf
u'.i
*c
7vfcsr
J 7ife
HIGH
LOW
i"; „•,«• >W
'--UJ ...
1. 1 ^
— —
'i L /f I
1 J *7 ^
1
*<='. 1_1. J_
1.'.%1 l-l _L
"!^
. . .1 .1.. U 1 1
1 1 1 1 -1 -
1 f -IA1 S htl OHIING
':;••"":' .':"<" |_
ll;t-
1
J (l°
uui 1 1
_l_L 1-1
^ .M [. If t IJM H I't •*!
^ M 1 1 .1 II f I nil >t H I'l It
. . IHA7 HA'.I Li Oil MY
.1 1 Y 1
1 lUui
Ammonia - Nitroaen
.mo/1 Net
i
--
1
I
i
I
DAILY AVG
C o
C.I
O.£
C.5
J
HIGH
LOW
^^t
I
1
i
O.(fj
c
f
c
j f,i
C(,
>
9
"S .5 1 » v v
VD.7eq
•jf|-)(
*i/r
)i.
7
-, ,'•'-' '
L/
c iin iCV
.
.^)S" i
' rVl
y
)V> I'/^l
)V •>" AC 3
f v-iVnt-
^
*
)(**.;. "K( ,
^l'/
VCRAGC
AXIMUM
i"-|u
.1 .
-j._
i
HIGH
LOW
<
0 ij"_ii(_j /i^lj ^
vl i C1'^ ^ i ^ L-
L_J-J I.J.. 1_
1 .
UMB^H DAYS nifOiuuiG I; 11
OIAL SAMI'lli IAHLN | , ,(
AYS CXCIEOING
C MAX. V.OC.
III.
1. .1
1 1
OUP PUMCM 1)1 ••!
IIY I'XAMINI D ANll"Ay JAMII
juiyiiriV HI r,)»(;jO'Jiiii/j/)ii il
River Flow
cfs
1
i
^>
V
I
(.
'
'
;-
^
C
^
c
V
(
c
V
DAILY AVG
| L . ' T)
/ V vr"
9cl
7V 7
It II,
•>_/-/
JC(/1
/-/<,"}
1C. '.(.-.
//'/(_•
;>( itc
~)l 7 I
1 I.I.I.
me 1 i,|
" I'l ,(.
»rs fycftoiuu MAXIMUM | i
C MAX VICH I,,,,,
IAII Wllll IIIL IIJIIJIIMAIION 'j
1 LAI/JI/JG Till I/J/IJ/IMA/IUW 1
River 'Available Cap'
kq/day
i
DAILY AVG.
|| 4 M <(0«
"3i" /CCO
7CCCC.C
V7C.1CC
tS"fc 6ct.
//vvcc c
tt
'//•(
( < i
i VJCK u
VEftAGC
AXIMUM
IMHtn u
UTAl SAI
LOW
N
1 J- J .1 1 J 1-
_L LJ_J L.
KY$ MI rniiiiNG
^I'LLS lAKtN I
-J...
MM
1 1
AYi IXCUOlliC l/AXII.IU/j j j
VC MAX. VtOt [ 1 I 1 1 I
our *-u/icH 111 ••!
UIIMHIIU IN llll'J I1UUIMINI
IIUlLVt IIIAI IIIL IUIUIlM/,1
Phosphorus - Total
nn/1
1
i
—
DAILY AVG
0. i
VEMACC
AXIMUM
HIGH
LOW
1 1
. 1. J . 1
J J 1
.1 J-il
1 1
1 i 1 1 1
UMIIf H l*AYS III COM IUG
UFAL SAI.irttS 1AA(N j
• a
j • j ^
i"lr
1 1 *
AYS CXCr(UIUG '.'AxlMUhf 1 J_
vc MA. ,,« _[__, j , , K
bur ruiiCM i)!. ••>
AND All Al thl IIMI 1*1 !i A'iO
5
10
IS
^
C
1^
L
5 I
0
(
(.'
*i
x'
I "
*J
c-
i
u
\
V
V
V.
I'1
-------
iislii ijftiw^ -1: •:
>POH CHEMICAL COMPANY
MIDLAND OIV
486<|0
JPCHUM HUM
Tl
ten too
DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY
OUTFALL' I 031
PROC.HASTES TO TITTABAHASSEE' R. 031
PERMIT EXPIRATIONI 10/79
Dale loim was
pnnied
81/10/29
t
A
31616
- COLIFORM-FECAL'
r
: i
1
t
i
1
j
t
. .„
\
H
i
*vl )
U>IA
UMi
\
DAILY AVG
"
C !
. — 1
'.!.»
IUM
1 II l<
t >k.i
if
i^._
:'
. _ -
— -
i
i
i
i
^r* iii
1 1 » ^
....
..._
-
_..
...
(Mil
t'l t
MA •
1
1 ,1
MAXIMUM
'Jno
HIGH
—
I"1-
LOW
ii... .
--._
...
1
1
1
1
J
I
1
1
--
! !c
'
—
-
D^ LY AVG
I
i
j
:
-
_j
HIGH
LOW
1
.1
-
!
—
J
i . _ _
w '""•': 1.1
»,,«„«, , t
!.i j i
! i l .1
J 1 _J . 1
1 1 .1 J
.J I.I 1
i'1 ;
TAI itvll'l t 0 1 AK( N j
r 1 AL' I I.INI. M'.XIMLI f.
Cul' I'U(
1
< 1 1,111 r i
Lll
j i .
J
.1
1 i
,'! M"* !'„',
1
—
,_
DAILY AVG
1
i
H
1
j
HIGH
1
i
-
~
Vt lACt
AXIMUM
UMlllfi |>
UlA| iAI.
1 I
[>
/•v;
) u
1
LOW
- J_l_l_l . 1 . 1 1.
l_t- 1 -1 1 1 1.
• li lltHJIIIIIiG | j
n is 1AKt
1 IJINO MAX
Jl- 1-uflCH
" 1
IMI1M
_ 1 1
1
1 . 1-
OBSERVATION .VISULi
'. 0 .'TO 'H
11
_0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
AXIMUM
DAILY AVG.
O
(•;
o
r>
t ;
o
c.
(•
C
(•-,
O
o
0
1 C)
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
G
c
0
c-
o
c
1 O
J
1
1
rj
VI
(--,
o
I,
c,
o
,AGC
HIGH
LOW
f
1
|
1 Li !°
AXIMUM .....I .1.111°
... ... .1 1 1 1 I 1 1
UMIUH OATS lUfOIIIINC | '•} | |
OTA1 LAMI'I f!i 1AKI II 1
AYS LXCLlllINd MAXIUUI.f
Vf. MAM VIUL j J 1 f
OUf PUNCH 1>» •*!
IIIAI 1 IIAVf 1 1 I15OIIAI IY
i',L lllblVIUUA i, IMMLIjl
•"•• ' " r r"""' "
;'e
.
1
—
DAILY AVG
-
HIGH
1
VI
'""' III l_L__
AXIMUM j j j |
- J -1- L 1 -1_
I.I 11
UMULH DAYS hU'UhimG
IIIAI '.AMI'lf 5 1 A»f| N 1
v.'lL'".v'"i. 1 i i i
UUP fUUCH U'- »•!
LOW
J 1
.1
1
1 I
1 J.
Consumers Power
Intake cfs
. . -
i
1
i
I
i
/
1
/
i
I
/
i
I
±
^
1
1
f-
r
i
i
/
VII
DAILY AVG
(.' •'
O
f
(_,
L)
c>
C'
o
C '
/J,
t_i
C '
c
I"
u
L'
",
/,
C1
( ;
f ,
(
f,
U
c
i
(..'
( /
AOt
UMUtll 0
HIGH
,
LOV/
i i i i i i o
i i i i i iC<
1 1 1 1 .1. 1 1.
ATS IUIOHIING K . I
OIAI r.AMI'l 1 •". l/.r.l U 1
OUP PUNCH in •••
L.I.
L_L.
Con
81
sumers Power
Dwdown cfs
i
c
,
^
-
c
i
^
i
k
c
<
f
DAILY AVG
l!
c
(
Hrl
11
\c
Ji
(_
c
•
.. -
-r i
.; ^
-Jl
O
O
17
f O
1
IL
)>,v
l|
i
f
(
L
••
y
"'It
">Mi_
i^h
-j-< .
"i ''i
\'i'l
'h
VINACC
MAXIMUM
UMbtH D
i i i
i i i
_i t_ i
i i i
ATS Ntl-OH
kjl Al ^.MAI'I 1 '^ t Ar 1
AYS [ XU 1 IXNL MAJ
OUf PllllCH
HIGH
1 1
I .2
1 I
IING
"" "J"
lit Ml
LOW
i- 1 -
1.
3,'
i I'T.
1 1 .
1. t—
5
10
IS
20
25
JO
C/AMIUII; AMI; AM IAMII AH Wllll IMF III < HlMA 1 ION/t,UllMI 1 1 1 U 111 IIIIL, 1)1)1. KMINI AfJI> All Al 1 A( HMI II l!> AND
A1LIY 111 M'UIT.IIIl 1 IUII 0 HA IIIMIj IIIL INK/llMAI I1JI/ III 1 II VL IIIAI IIIL Illl OIII/A 1 H JN I'j 1H1JC AUUHAII, AUU
i.c cnn QimMHliur. rAI«-/1lNIUHMA!l()l'l. HJf.l Ul/rtli /It I'OSSIIII/llY Of flNE A.IIU ll/l II LONMI til
U. '
z*
o
(0
-------
,r
DOW CHEMICAL USA
MICHIGAN DIVISION — MIDLAND PLANT
NON-CONVENTIONAL/TOXIC POLLUTANTS — OUTFALL 031
PERMIT #MI 0000868
TABLE 1
Monitor!no Results — October, 1984
Phenol
2,4-D i chIorophenoxyacetIc
acid
B i s(2-chIoroethy1)ether
Chloroform
2,3,7,8-Tetrachloro-
dibenzo-p-d ioxi n
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
TetrachIoroethyIene
1,1,2-Tr ichloroethane
Pentachlorophenol
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichorobenzene
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Methylene Chloride
2-Chlorophenol
2,4-Dichlorophenol
Naphthalene
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Bromoform
Chlorobenzene
Carbon Tetrachloride
2,4,6-Tr ichlorophenol
1,2-D i chIorobenzene
Aery Ion itr ile
Month ly
Average
(!bs/day)
0.3
.0005*
0.5
2.2
1.1x10~6
0.2
0.4
" —
.04
4.9
Dai ly Month 1 y
Maximum Averaae
(Ibs/day) (ua/h
0.4 2
.0005* NDC1.5)
0.6 3
2.5 11
1 .6x10" 6.2 ppa
ND ( 5 . 0 )
NDC6.0)
ND ( 1 1 )
ND(4)
0.2 0.5
NDC0.6)
0.4 2
ND(9)
ND(0.6)
ND(1 )
.04 .2
ND(7)
ND(6)
ND(5)
6.4 24
ND(2)
ND(0.6)
ND(2)
Dai ly
Maximum
(pa/I)
2
4
3
12
8.8 ppa
5
—
—
18
1
1
2
30
—
—
0.2
—
2
—
30
—
1
13
Mass discharqe measured at 031 a
-------
DOW CHEMICAL USA
MICHIGAN DIVISION ~ MIDLAND PLANT
NON-CONVENTIONAL/TOXIC POLLUTANTS — OUTFALL 031
PERMIT #MI 0000868
TABLE 2
Phenol
2,4-Dichlorophenoxy
acetic acid
B'\s( 2-ch I oroethy I) ether
Chloroform
2,3,7,8-Tetrachloro-
d ibenzo-p-diox i n
1,1,2,2-Tetrach ioroethane
TetrachIoroethyIene
1,1,2-Tr ichIoroethane
Pentachloropheno!
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichorobenzene
1,2,4-Tr ichlorobenzene
Methylene Chloride
2-Chlorophenol
2,4-Dichlorophenol
Naphtha!ene
1,1,1-Tr ichIoroethane
Bromoform
Chlorobenzene
Carbon Tetrachloride
2,4,6-Tr ichlorophenol
1,2-D ichlorobenzene
Aery Ion itr iIe
Mon
Concentrat ion
ug/l iter
2
4
2
12
3.5 ppa
ie ND(5)
ND(5)
ND ( 11 )
~ND(4)
1
ND(0.6)
2
30
ND(0.6)
NDU )
0.2
ND(7)
2
ND(5)
17
ND(2)
ND(0.6)
ND(2)
itorina Resu!
Samp 1 e
Date
10/1/84
10/1/84
10/1/84
10/1/84
9/24/84
10/1/84
10/1/84
10/1/84
10/1/84
10/1/84
10/1/84
10/1/84
10/1/84
10/1/84
10/1/84
10/1/84
10/1/84
10/1/84
10/1/84
10/1/84
10/1/84
10/1/84
10/1/84
Its — October,
Concentrat ion
yg/ I iter
1
ND(1 .5)
3
9
8.8 ppci*
5
ND(6)
ND ( 1 0 )
18
0.5
1
2
ND(9)
ND(0.5)
ND(1 )
0.2
ND(7)
ND(6)
ND(2)
30
ND(2)
1
13
1984
Samp 1 e
Date
10/15/84
10/15/84
10/15/84
10/15/84
10/06/P4
10/15/84
10/15/84
10/15/84
10/15/84
10/15/84
10/15/84
10/15/84
10/15/84
10/15/84
10/15/84
10/15/84
10/15/84
10/15/84
10/15/84
10/15/84
10/15/84
10/15/84
10/15/84
ND = Not Detected
( ) = Lowest Detection Limit
* = Concentration Reported as Part Per Quadrillion
-------
HIt>LA"0 DIV
' I
iic'i'i* »«u*.'inJr~J IIIKVII NuMiii*
J6500jJ_J LJJlO.OypJI
U.
'J10.0.0PJJ.WLJ -5-60 J 5-B-
tMI'i !'• Vllllll MtlNIIII V III rnllt f f>1M I ""
SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR RETURN MAIL
Ple.isc complete and sulimil Iwo copies ol Ihis loim
it the end nl tjich month This ic|K)M '"Oil reach ouf
LrfniingoMicc liy ihe lOlh ol the month.
PART 1 - RETURN TO DEFT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
c>nH ciinur. AL
.OUTFALL I 031
PROC.HASTES TO T ITTABAHASSEEi R, 031
PERMIT EXPIRATION!
10/79
Date fo'm was
pf.ntcd
81^.1 0/29
PAR AM
NAME
UNITS
LIMIT
DATE
10-1
2
3
4
S
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
IS
16
(7
18
19
20
1.21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
I.*ONTMLY
VJ'-.'tRY
M r^i'jr.-if*
f NDI*'G 0
OOCll
TEMP-HATER
r
1 DAILY AVG
• 57
-r | ?<•
? S<,
c 57
(' Sfc
r 5%
<- s*
r C i
V l<
f V" '
c c '
r v i
r C i
r 6-7
f C
f 5
t (.
C 1, fe
c ' i
f t
c C
C <
r <
f «
C 1 '
T
AVSRAGE
MAXIMUM
"•JI-5EH 0
• 2
n
>t
f
2.
7
7
s •
r'
•i
;7
37
57
1 .!_
_J_JL_
AYS REPO
'US TAK
JVC MAJ(. VKX •
; DAIE
•
HIGH
4.1
S7
Co
^
10
DA
DAILY AVG.
J7C.VO 7
3 11 770
j-llr J77
J75 »=>i
^VS f'f
3S8?t- J
a-ife
Voe
1'f *
RAGE
KIMUM
•BE" 0
AL SAh
fSCXCI
S'/"
'S
O
SJJ
(C-f?
1 1
1 1 .
tVS AEPO
IPIESTAX
EOINO M<
HIGH
|3i««,
,0,0,
i_i_i.
IIIING
EN
kXIMUU
LOW
t,.,.
iL?JJ
1 1
«VG MAX. VIOL 1 1 t t 1 1
OUP PUNCH (IS ••!
ALLY EXAMINED AND AM FAU
MEDIATELY HESPONSmiE FOR
ALTIES FOR SUBMITTINQ) FALSE
^^ /~> /
River
cf
i
£
C
r
<•
r
r
r
r
r
~iT
t
r
r
c
r
r
AVI
MA
1O1
Flow
5
1
DAILY AVG.
M~f7
r
}
(,
RAGE
KIMUM
•BfB 0
Al SA>.
fS EXCE
* 'T
5*3
3 t f*
^s?—
rH7
7H7
7SO
-73
1 1
1
_)_!_
^YS RfO
PIESTAK
EDINO k'»
HIGH
_
1
1 I.
1 1 1-
l_l 1
RUNG
EN
XtMU1-'
LOW
> 1 ^1^
1 1
i 1
AVC MAX W)l 1 1 |..|. |_
LIAR WITH THE INFORMATION
DDTAINING THE INfOllMATlON.
INFO/IMATIOfQ I/CLUD NG THE
/ / . // . ' /
River
i
AVE
MA)
Ml1
101
DAY
DAIL
v<
To\
RAGE
tMUM
5ER 0
Al SAk
S EXCE
'Ava
kn
Y AV
il
/d
r
j
'i
5T5FC
i ^
_l' C
_J 1 _
AYS Rtro>
TIES TAX
EOING WA
able Cap'
ay
HIGH
6,^,:
I_L_L
TING
EN ]
LOW
L1fe'7
'.VG ."" V'°l 1 1 1 1 1
SURMITTED IN THIS DOCU^l N
.DEHEVE THAI THE INIORMA
/POSSIBILITY OF FINE AND IMP
Phosphorus - Total
mo/1
i
i
AVE
Mi
V
101
J.
DAILY AVG
"AGE
I*.'UM
-------
MlOLAUD
I | IIACII"' f»tt/«i
L2J 1360.001
r.I '10MO
Tii'/.i HOMMH
[y "AH wu'/(iiT~]
00.0.0.8 6 ft L5.60J36 _ I
SEE lltVCIISE SIOC fOft fICTimM MAIL
Pk-avc cnrnpli'iu .inrl luhinii two coi'H'i ol llm lorm
n\ i lie end (>l cuch inonih. Tim rtporl mull reach our
Ldomig olliu1 |jy ihc lOih ol ll* month.
PART 1 - RETURN TO DEFT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
OUTfALL f fiJl
PROC,WASTES TO T I TTABAHASSEE'R. 031
PERMIT EXPIRATION! 10/79
Dote fo'
printed
.•8I/10/2SLJ
PARAM
NAME
UNITS
LIMIT
DATE
\0- i
]
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
1?
13 1
FLOH
1
C"
(
f
c
f
S
CO
HGO
£0
NO
DAILY AVG
,
M. J
7^.1
J-3.^
3
3.7
t- -J3.J
r
f
c
i
25-'
It."
i<-.'
JC.f
( 25.')
f
2
J
5.7
«.*
U |< 2?. "<
IS 1C
16 C
17
IB
c
50
UIT
HIGH
iS. J
i
?. y
'
.2S-.J
C 3
?3 If c *•
24 |f
75 r
•D
D
M
„ i
75 f 2C-.t
77
73 1
75 !
t'O'JTMlY
f 3X'
f
2C-.7
3
J
fc.7
««.f
«i^«.
l.o
1
»VFRAC:| , | | | |2|.|?
1
i 1 1 1
1 1 1 1
111 II
NU"6Cr 3AVS BEPOflTING
l-'f
TOTAl S'^PltS TAKtN j , ,t
DAYS EX:EEDING MAXIMUK^ |
we vo vwi | | | | | |
our PUNCH iisui
003^3
OXVGEN DEHAN-TOT
" HG/L " '
i
c
c
e
f
f
DAILY AVG.
(rl
77
7B
C«
71
f
r
f
f
r
<-
(
f
r
r
r
C
(
frl
f i
71/
fel
OM
. <^ J
t?
*• J
(,-S
HIGH
LOW
7
"AGE
MUM
UMBEn D
OTAl. SAI.
1
i
J
1
'^"ttlill
j_j_ j
^YS nEron
_!._!_
TING
J__L
[2|7
••LtS TA»(tN J . C
AYS EXCEEDING MAXIMUI.\| |
VG MAX V,t,l "] I , ,' , ,
DUT PUNCH I'S 181
SOLI
i
1
I
i
I
^70300 _
DS-DISS-180C-
HG/L1' •
DAILY AVG
MOO/
4feC.<)
HIGH
(i+~
H5P&
4711
! 126fc
1 HJJfe
<
1
NS'ifc
H^?T
v(
LOW
)->••'-'
BAGE
AXIMUM
,, | V S,! |t
till1* 8,6, *(
1 1 1 1 1
I 1 1 1 1
U'-^RFR DAYS REPORTING
OTAL SAUPIES TAKEN
AYS EXCEEDING MAXIMUM
VC MAX V
_jft
i i^
1 J
m 1 Jill
our PUNCH (ii iei
^7030
.SOLIDS-SUS-NET
" HG/L' ' "
AVERAGEI
:30
1
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
DAILY AVG.
(7.S
rt.i
.3^. b
72.0
ir.i
i1?.?
0,0
c?.<»
WFHAGE
1AXIMUM
MAXIMUM
45 ' ' '
HIGH
(<.*•-
LOW
•_> A- 1
1
_L_1_L|l ,5",. ,l(
i i | i3 1^
i_l_L 1 .J
J.M6
i i
. 1 .1 J - 1
^u'.'ntfi CAYS ntrORl NC 1 i^
OTAl SAi.
PIES TAKEN | ! ^
3AYS EXCEEDING UAXH'u^ | [O
VC M« viol j ! | | t
DUP PUNCH Mi BSl
•^7031
30LIDS-SUS-WET*0
" •"LBS/OAY
AVERAGE' ] '.AXIKUM
: 0^.30 1 i 8 '37
t
—
DAILY AVG
j'tJO
2C-CH
HIGH
LOW
es'^3
VTi'?
3(fvr, v.x. v.ot ( ,
OUf PUNC"
in net
I-J-
1 1
ooioo
•p»
0 TO 11
PAXII1UM FulNI
•9.S ]6,0
t
c
f
r
r
<•
<
c
r
r
r
<
c
<
'
f
r
f
<
C
C
r
r
r
f
^
<•
r
-
DAILY AVG
«i. 2
1.1
T i
1. 1
O. i
filGH
-Jrr
•f. i
ir
T. 3 | «>. j
"7-i-
^..i ]
t'. 7 |
C.7
t.*
— ^r-
1,c
•t.c
Tit
e.i
9.C
Y.C
7.}
f-j
" [
VEKAGF , l
A V
, .'(
LOV
"CT
•7.0
7 o
7.1
TT"
I.-T
1.C
§
f . ^
"?• r
t-c-
f.'7
t r
-r
-------
MI OL*'JO
:• I '10 6 H 0
raKTot.
8_J
IMII 11 vniin MONTHI v niPofiT FDIIM I on
si r ruvensE SIDE rcm nEiunw MAIL
PIlMSP cprnplrlc iind Julirnit two COP'l'S Ol lltlS lofm
Ht Ihc end ol each monlh This rcpoM muit reach our
L anvnq office by Ihe 10lh of Ihc monlh
PART 1 - RETURN TO DEFT OF NATURAL KESOUnCES
OHW CHFIIIfAL COMPANY
OUTFALL I 031
PROC. HASTES TO T I TTADAWASSEE' R. 031
PERMIT EXPIRATION! in/79
Dale form wai
printed
Bl/10/29
PAH AM
NAME
UMTS
"LIMIT
DATE"
IC.t
2
3
4
S
e
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
COLI
•I
i
H
FOR
HF_/_
L~Y~AV
7
16
1-
i.a
G.
I
I
I
I
' I
J
I
O
11
FE
Of
Mr1
H(
H
:CAI_:
ii_'
,XIMUM
>0
IGH
f«r
J
I
I
14 |
'5 1 1
o
4-
16 |
17 1
18 I 1
19
20
LOW
«r\
I
I
<7.21 ! I
22 I !
23
24
2S
28
27
28
29 n
30
*
• 'ONf MIY
-.U'.'MARY
I
i
i
i I o
1
1
i
1
AVERAGE
MAXIMUM
)
i i
,
NUMBER DAYS REPORTING
TOTAL SAWPUS TAKEN
9«YS EXCEEDING
'VG u.t v.n.
• TG'NNING OATE
(uDtNG DATE
MAXIMUM
o1
c/
1 o
M M
1 1
2 o
J.—1.L
j i_
,
J~£
1*fr
SIM
0 0 V T
!
Dt LY AVG.
~T
i
HIGH
LOW
'VERAGt! , | |
lAXIMUv' | , , | |
• 1 II
1 1 1 _1_ 1 1
iU^BER t~ AYS REPORTING
O'AL SSWLES TAKEN
DAYS EXCEEDING MAXIMUM
VG M.K S'N
1 1 1
PUP PUNCH »TS MI
~
1
DAILY AVG
AVERAGE
'.AXIMUM
HIGH
LOW
1 <
1
_i_a_^L_L_L_a_
II 1 1 1 1
1 1
NUMBER DAYS REPOF
L_J_1_J_0_
TING ,
TOTAL SAMPLES TAKEN
DAYS EXCEEDING MAXIMUM
.VG MIX V
1 1
1 1
101 1 1 1 i 1
OUP PUNCH US 8«!
OBSERVATION .VISULi
. 0 'TO 'U
MAXIMUM
0 '
i
i
t
i
i
DAILY AVG
O
CJ
O
to
I c.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
e-
c?
O
O
c?
c
e.
o
t
e
1 O
i °
I t
i fc
. O
I
1
1
1
o
t-
«.
a
I e>
I
i
1
t
t
6
fo
b
t
o
AVERAGE !
MAXIMUM ,
1
1
HIGH
LOW
II i |G
II 11°
i I i 1 1
II II
NUMBER DAYS REPORTING 3 \**
TOTAL SAMPLES TAKEN
i3|t
DAYS EXCEEDING MAXIUUSlj | |C>
AVG MAX VIOL
li II
OUP PUNCH ITS •»!
.
-
1
T
DAILY AVG
1
AVERAGE
MAXIMUM
HIGH
LOW
—
—
I 1 I ' i 1
ill ,
III 1
t i i | i
NUMBER DAYS REPORTING | ,
TOTAL SAMPLES TAKEN
DAYS EXCEEDING MAXIMUM
AVG MAS V 01
DUP PUN
1
1
i i i
CM ITS us
Consumers Power
Intake cfs
• - |
'
--
DAILY AVG
c
c
c
t-
HIGH
.
t
t i
c.
t
c
to
c
fc
*-
to
t
fc
t
c
c
1
LOW
e
e
c
c
0
c
&
c
t
£•
AVERAGE , , , ,
.'AXIMUM | , t 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 -
1 1
iji
, i
JUMPER DAYS REPORTING IJ iC.
TOTAL SAMPLES TAKEN | ( ,
DAYS EXCEEDING MAXiMUKlJ
.VG K,,« VOL [ , ,
L 1
DUP PUNCH ITS 8fll
Consumers
Blowdown
Power
cfs
J
I
—
-
OAlt Y AVG
2^0
"J7^
3 '5
3"
>IS
.?'S
2'S
7IJ
ji»
_
2'S
- Jr-
••u
c
o
o
c
o
o
"^
c
o
HIGH
—
— -
c 1 _,
*> 1
»ERAGE , , ,
.AX.MUM , , ,
_l_ll
1 I2
II 111
lOv\
—
—
—
1- l
.. - - I J L 1_ 1- 1 _1
NUMBER DAYS RE POST ING 1^1C
OTAL SAMcil S TAKEN ]
JAYS E XCC ED'NG '.'A XIMIJ« i i
VG M,, V,OL 1 | | , | ,
DUP PUNCH l»l *«t
1 CEFOIFY UNDER PENALTY OF LAW THAT 1 IAVE PERSONALLY EXAMINED AND AM FAMILIAR WITH THE INFORMATION SUBMI1TED IN THIS DOCUMENT AND ALL ATTACHMENTS AN
THAT DASEO ON MY INQUIRY OF THOSE INDIVIDUALS IMMEDIATELY RESPONSIBLE TOR, OBTAINING THE INFORMATION. 1 RELIEVE THAT THE INFORMATION IS TRUE ACCURATE. AN!
COMPLETE 1 AM AWARE THAT THERE ARE SIGNIFICANT PENALTIES FOR SUnMITTING FA/gE INFORMATION. INCLUDING THE POSSIBILITY OF FINE AND IMPRISONMENT
Z_. /~)ll f'j /
*/ rCJr •'"< ntt* 1 /' f/S/ft^'le
SIGNATURE O» CERTlflED OPERATOR_ R YDEN- T H 0 M A S--E^tft! '•'
'»i r ~
ONNUMSER_WOOI287 -
I
-n,-, • Ty -^ ^ I * -.-—•,
'I-1/' * L ... , 'i
^1!ililll|Pilii!'!l !|!'&W?$
TrT
' 4*
-------
APPENDIX C-2
1981 USEPA Sediment Survey
-------
MIDLAND
CONTINUOUS
MO»TITOf»l»» STA:
LE9END
SEOIMEMT SAMPLIM* STATIOH3
SAM^LINO SrATIONS
-------
TABLE 1
SEDIMENT SAMPLING LOCATIONS •
TITTABAWASSEE AND CHIPPEWA RlVERSt M-20 to Smith's Crossing
MARCH 18-19, 1981
Station
Number
1*
2»
3
-------
scturgcr: Tittabowassco Illvcr
•ople Date: March 18-19, 1981
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION V
Eastern District Office
Sediment Results
Sample Type: 0 C-8 dour (low proi>ortloned composite
2'iC-Z'i ttour flow proportioned composite
EVC-Equal Volume Composite
G-Gr«b
VtflE TYPE
HE
JE
!PTH FEET -(water)
&AMETEH
ORGAN I CS
A. Bas
1,3
e/Neutral & Acid Comppum
-diehlorobonzene
1 ,4-dichlorobenzcne
hcxachloruL'thane
bis
n-n
^-chlorocthyl ) ether
itrosoduiroovldiiiine
nitrobenzene
iso
' bis
1.2
j2
phorone
2-chl oroethoxy )methane
-dichlorobenzene
,4-trichl orobenzene
naphthalene
hexachl orobu tad i ene
2-chloronaphthalene
ace
dim
naphthylene
et lylpnthalate
2,6-dinitrotoluene
acenaphthene
2.4-dinitro toluene
f jj
d e
1.5
Osfl
orene
thylphthalate
-dlphenyl hydrazine
itmodinhpnvlamine
mg/kg
e
•
Gross
l/Oay
Titt. River
Above Dow Dan
EH03S02
G
1505
3/18/81
3.0
mg/kg
<0.1
-------
iscfurger: THtabowassee River
Date: March 10-19, 1'JUl
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION V
Eastern District Office
Sediment Results
Sample Type: 8 C-0 l>our (low proportioned composite
Z'iC-l'i liour MUM proportioned composite
EVC-tqu«l Vulunie Composite
G-Grab \
-AMPLE TYPE
;IME
DATE
OEPTH FEET • (Water)
3ARA«ETER
A. Base/Neutral & Acid Compounds
4-bromophenvlphenvl ether
hexachlorobenzene
1-chloronaph thai one
phenanthrene/anthracene
fluorantherie
pyrene
di-n-butylphthalate
butvlbenzvlDhthalate
chrysene
benzo(A)anthracene
b1s(2-ethylhexvl)phthalate
a i-n-c
benro
benzot
Indeno
benzo(
dlbrom
2-nitr
2-chlc
phenol
?'4-dj
2.4-dl
P^bu
L iy i pin.no i<
Blfluorantf
A) pyrene
1.2.3-C.O"]
»,H,I)pery
obfphenyl(
oghenol
rophenol
methyl phenc
chloropfenc
ty\ phenol
ie
iene
pyrene
ene
STD)
»1
>1
•
mg/kg
Cross
I/Day
TUt. River
Above Dow Oar
FH03502
6
1505
3/18/81
3.0
rag/ kg
<0.2
<0.0
<0.0
-------
.charger: THtabawasscc River
t>U Dale: March 18-19, 1981
U.S. EHYIRONMEM1AL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION V
Eastern District Office
Sediment Results
Sample Type: 8 C-fl hour
2'tC-J'i duur
Mow proportioned composite
DIM proportioned composite
EVC-Cqu«l Volume Composite
C-Grab
HPLE TYPE
Hi
TE
PT'H FEET (Water)
(URETER
BaseVNeiLiral & Acid Compounds
p-chl oro-m-cresol
2,4 ,6-trichlorophcnol
pentachlorouhenol
4-pi trc
jDhenol
PCB's i PBB's
PCB 1242
PCB 1248
PCB 1254
PtB 1260
hexabrbnio-biphenyl _
dib_romo-biohenvl
Puroeablps*
cjjlgfgbenzene
Other Comoounds
hydrocarbons (9)
sulfur
1.7r7-
he
Tsa^
trimethvl -bicyclo [2.2.1
•
mg/kg
Gross
//Day
TiU. River
Above Dow Dan
EH03S02
G
1505
3/18/81
3.0
mg/kg
"0.4
<0.5
<0 1
< 13
_< 1_
"fr~7~
<0:Q5
1.0
Gross
//Day
..
. ^
— m
Titt. River
Below H Flume
EH03S03
G
0935
3/19/81
2.0
mg/kg
<5.2
<0.5
< 6
<0.6 '
-------
Dlscrvaroer: Tittabjwassec River
Sample Date: March 18-19, 1981
u.s. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION v
Eastern District Office
Sample Type: 8 C-8 l.our Mow proportioned compos Ice
24C-A Ituur Mow proportioned composite
EVC-Equal Volume Composite
C-Grab
SAMPLE TYPE
TIME
DATE
DEPTH FEET • (Uater)
PARAMETER
D. Other Compounds
octanpic acid
bota-gurjunene
alpha-fornesene
1 -methoxy-4- ( phenyl ethyi
unidentified compounds
unidentified compounds
unidentified compounds
unidentified compounds
unidentified compounds
unidentified compounds
unidentified compounds
unidentified com
hydrocarbons (2)
sec-butvlcthvlbe
3,5-dimethyl-2-c
).3.5-tris(1-met
1 ,1 'oxybisbenzen
2-phenoxv-l ,1 'bi
terpheny'l
l.r :3',l-terphe
hydrocarbons (11
sulfur molecule
iy~1)benz{
Spectrui
Spectrui
Spectrur
i Spectrur
'Specirur
Spectrur
Spectrur
aounas Spectrur
yclohexen-1-one
hvlethvllbenzeni
e
phenyl
nyl
S8)
•
mg/kg
ne
395<
si;
Gross
//Day
T1U. River
Above Dow Dar
EH03S02
G
1505
3/18/81
3.0
mg/kg
n
--
Gross
I/Day
^ «•
Titt. River
Below H Flume
EH03S03
G
0935
3/19/81
2.0
mg/kg
—
--
Gross
//Day
-
T1tt. River
Near J6.Br1ne
Pond
EH03S04
G
0945
3/19/81
2.0
mg/kg
—OTB"
-T7T
— DTT
I.I
0.2
0.4
0.9
1.. G
Q.9
Q. 5
Gross
I/Day
--
--
THt. River
Below Bullock
Creep.
EH03S05
G
1005
3/19/81
1.5
mg/kg
--
0.3
Q.I
0.1
o.i
0.8
0.1
2 2
4..Q
Gross
//Day
--
__J1^-
Titt. River
Below L ingle
EH03S06
G
1025
3/19/81
1.0
mg/kg
--
Q.5
0.8
Gross
//Day
--
--
T1tt. River
Above Smith1!
Crossing
EHU3S07
G
•1045
3/19/01
2.5
mg/kg
3.0
5.3
7.7
Gross
jf/Oay
--
--
mg/kg
Gross
I/Day
mg/kg
Gr.
-------
Discharger: T1 ttabawassce lilver
Sample Date: March 10-19, 1901
U.S. CHVIROHMCHTAL PROTECTIOK AGENCf
REGION V
Eastern District Office
Sediment Results
Sample Type: 8 C-8 hour fluw proportioned compojlte
Z'iC-J'i hour HtM proport looed composite
EVC-Cqual Volume Composite
C-Crab
SAMPLE TYPE
TIME
DATE
DEPTH FEET -(Water)
PARAMETER
). Other Compounds
unidentified silicon compounds
hexactlwl benzene
4-phenoxy-l ,1 '-biphenyl
tetrapthvl benzene (1 isdmpr )
1 ,2,4,b-tetrakis (' -methyl ethyl
benzene
unidentified silicon compounds
hydrocarbons (1 )
unidentified compounds Spectri
unidentified compounds Spectri.
mg/kg
[10j
\ w
[4)
"
n 448'
m 973
Cross
I/Day
Titt. River
Above Dow Dai
EH03S02
G
1505
3/18/81
3.0
mg/kg
..
»
v
__
Cross
I/Day
*.
- .•
• •
• .
-»
Titt. River
iBelow H Flume
EH03S03
G
0935
3/19/81
2.0
mg/kg
.-
._
__
^ f.
„
Cross
I/Day
—
..
..
. .
_.
_—
Titt. River
Near #6 Brine
Pond
EH03S04
G
0945
3/19/01
2.0
mg/kg
—
--
..
..
..
__
Cross
»/Oay
—
--
.-
..
--
„_
— w
Titt. RiveT
Below Bullock
Creek
EH03S05
G
1005
3/19/81
1.5
mg/kg
•-
—
--
-.
—
_.
— m
Cross
X/Oay
--
—
--
--
--
.-
__
Titt. River
Below Lingle
Drain
EH03S06
G
1025
3/19/81
1.0
mg/kg
3.3
--
--
..
—
—
..
__
Gross
f/Day
--
--
—
.-
—
—
--
..
Titt. River
Above Smith's
Crossing
EH03S07
G
1045
3/19/01
2.5
mg/kg
--
1 O~~
2.3
1.4
0.9
4.4
4:0
? 1
Gross
//Ojy
--
--
--
--
--
--
..
--
..
mg/kg
I/Day
mg/kg
Groi t
//Dir
-------
APPENDIX C-3
1984 USEPA Sediment Survey
-------
Table 1
Sediment Sampling Locations
Tittabawassee River
July 25-27, 1984
Station
Number
TR-1
TR-2
TR-3
TR-4
TR-5
TR-6
TR-7
Sample
Number
84ER04S01
84ER04S02
84ER04S03
84ER04S05
84ER04S07
84ER04S08
84ER04S09
TR-8 84ER04S12
TR-9 84ER04S13
Location and Site Specific Collection Method
The site is located above the ash pond, below the confluence of the Chippewa
River, at the abandoned Benson Street bridge abutments. The sample was taken by
Ekman dredge in 10 feet of water.
The site is located below the ash pond discharge and above the Dow Chemical
Tittabawassee River water intake.
The site is located above Lingle Drain about 750 feet above the railroad bridge.
Samples were collected with a Peterson dredge in 3 inches of water.
The site is located 12 yards downstream of the Smith's Crossing bridge. The
samples were taken with a Peterson dredge.
This site is located 1200 feet downstream of Sarle Drain and upstream of Brown
Mills Run. Samples were obtained from a water depth of 6 inches using a stainless
steel spoon.
Samples were collected from about the midpoint of the Freeland Road bridge using
an Ekman dredge to a water depth of 4 feet.
Samples were collected from the Tittabawassee Road bridge using an Ekman dredge
to a depth of about 3 feet.
Samples were collected from the Gratiot Road bridge using an Ekman dredge.
Samples were collected from the Center Road bridge using an Ekman dredge.
-------
Table 2
Flood Plain Sampling Locations
Tittabawassee River
July 25-27, 1984
Station Sample
Number Number Location and Site Specific Collection Method
FP-1 84ER04S04
This soil sample was taken in the Tittabawassee River Flood Plain adjacent to
the Dow Chemical tertiary pond, about 200 feet from the river. The soil was
removed to a depth of 1 inch using a shovel and large spoon.
FP-2 84ER04S06 This soil sample was taken in the Tittabawassee River Flood Plain about 1200
feet upstream of Gordonville Road and below Waite and Debolt drain. The samples
were taken by stainless steel spoon to a depth of 1 inch.
FP-3 84ER04S10 This soil sample was obtained in the Tittabawassee River Flood Plain under the
Tittabawasse bridge about 10 feet from shore.
-------
charger:
;p1e Date:
Tittabawassee River
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION Y
EASTERN DISTRICT OFFICE
Sediment Analyses
Sample Type;
8 C-8 hour flow proportioned composite
24C-24 hour flow proportioned composite
EVC-Equal volume composite
7/27/84 TR-5 G-Grab
.Station #: TR-1 TR-2 TR-3 TR-4 Uostream TR-6 TR-7 TR-8 TR-9
Sample Type
Time
Sample Number 84ER04
Date
Parameter
I. VOLATILES
Acrolein
Acrylonitrile
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
1,1,1-trichloroethane
1,1-dichloroethane
1,1,2-trichloroethane
1 ,1 ,2 ,2-tetrachl oroethane
Chloroethane
Bi s( chl oromethyl ) ether
Z-chloroethyl vinyl ether
Chloroform
1,1-dichloroethene
Trans-l,2-dichloroethene
1 ,2-dichloropropane
Trans-1 ,3-dichloropropene
Cis-l,3-dichloropropene
Ethyl benzene
Methyl ene chloride
Chloromethane
Above
Ash
Pond
G
1610
SOI
7/25/84
ug/kg
(ppb)
NO/50
ND/50
ND/2.5
ND/2.b
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/5
ND/2.5
2400*
ND/2.5
Below
Ash
Pond
G
1700
S02
7/25/84
ug/kg
(ppb)
ND/50
ND/50
ND/2.B
ND/2.b
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/5
ND/2.5
32*
ND/2.5
Above
Lingle
Drain
G
1900
S03
7/25/84
ug/kg
(ppb)
ND/50
ND/50
ND/2.b
NU/2.b
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/5
ND/2.5
29*
ND/2.5
At
Smith's
Crossing
G
2010
SOS
7/25/84
ug/kg
(ppb)
ND/b'O
ND/b'O
ND/2.b
m/'l.b
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/5
ND/2.5
17*
ND/2.5
of Brown
Mill's
Run
G
2050
S07
7/25/84
ug/kg
(ppb)
ND/bU
ND/50
NU/5».b
NU/^.b
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/5
ND/2.5
46*
ND/2.5
At
Freeland
Road
G
0840
SOS
7/27/84
ug/kg
(ppb)
NU/bU
ND/bO
ND/^.b
NU/^.b
wn/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/5
ND/2.5
16*
ND/2.5
At
Titta.
Road
G
0920
S09
7/27/84
ug/kg
(ppb)
ND/bU
ND/bU
ND/i!.b
NU/'^.b
Nn/?.s
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/5
ND/2.5
57*
ND/2.5
At
Gratiot
Road
G
0945
S12
7/27/84
ug/kg
(ppb)
NU/bU
NU/bU
"NU/^.b
NU/z.b
Nn/?.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/5
ND/2.5
40*
ND/2.5
I At
Center
Road
G
0850
S13
7/27/84
ug/kg
(ppb)
NU/bU
NU/bU
NU/Z.b
NU/Z.b
wn/?.s
ND/2,5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
Kin/?. 5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
NO/?. 5
ND/ 5
ND/2.5
99*
ND/2.5
-------
^charger:
Tittabawassee River
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION V
EASTERN DISTRICT OFFICE
Sample Type: 8 C-8 hour flow proportioned compos1t<
24C-24 hour flow proportioned composit*
Die Date:
^ . , tVU-cquat vu unic luuiuus i ic
7/25/84 Sediment Analyses JR_5 G-Grab
7/27/84 Station #• ™_i TB.2 TR-3 TR-4 ,ne^M« TR-6 TR-7 TR-8 TR-9
Sample Type
Time
Sample Number a/ironA
Date
Parameter
1. VOLATILE* (continued)
Bromomethane
Bromoform
Bromodichl oromethane
THcl
il orof 1 uoromethane
Dlchl orodl f 1 uoromethane
Chlorodlbromomethane
Tetrachl oroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
Acetone
2-butanone
Carbon dlsulfide
2-hexanone
4-methyl -2-pentanone
Styrene
Viny'
Total
acetate
xylenes
Above
Ash
Pond
G
1610
SD1
7/25/84
ug/kg
(ppb)
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2t5
ND/2.5
5 2
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/50
ND/100
ND/5
ND/50
ND/50
ND/2.5
ND/5
ND/2.5 |
Below
Ash
Pnnd
G
1700
SQ2
7/25/84
ug/kg
( ppb)
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
, ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/100
ND/5
ND/50
ND/50
ND/2.5
ND/5
ND/2.5
Above
L ingle
Drain
G
1900
S03
7/25/84
ug/kg
(DDb)
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2-5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/50
ND/100
ND/5
ND/50
ND/50
ND/2.5
ND/5
ND/2.5
At
Smith's
fj-pssing
G
2010
S05
7/25/84
ug/kg
(ppb)
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2, 5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/50
ND/100
ND/5
ND/50
ND/50
ND/2.5
ND/5
ND/2.5
of Brown
Mill's
Run
G
2050
S07
7/25/84
ug/kg
(ppb)
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/50
NU/IUU
ND/5
[ ND/50 I
ND/50
ND/2.5
ND/5
1 ND/2.5
At
rreeland
Road
G
0840
SOS
7/27/84
ug/kg
(ppb)
Hft/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
Nn/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
[ ND/2.5 ]
t ND/2.5 1
ND/50
NU/ 1UU
ND/5
1 ND/50 1
ND/50
ND/2.5
ND/5
1 ND/2.5
At
Titta.
Road
G
0920
S09
7/27/84
ug/kg
(ppb)
ND/2.IT
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5,
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
[ ND/2.5 1
[ ND/2.5 I
[ ND/2.5 1
ND/50
MD/I nn
ND/5
1 ND/50 1
1 ND/50
ND/2.5
ND/5
1 ND/2.5
At
Gratiot
Road
G
0945
S12
7/27/84
ug/kg
(ppb)
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2 . 5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
(NH/2.5 1
[ND/2.5 1
| ND/2. 5 1
[ND/2.5 1
ND/50
ND/1 00
ND/5
ND/50
ND/50
ND/2.5
[ND/5
ND/2.5
At
Center
Road
G
0850
S13
7/27/84
ug/kg
(ppb)
ND/Z.b
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2 5
ND/2 5
ND/2.5 I
ND/2.5 I
I ND/2, 5 I
t ND/2. 5 I
ND/50
ND/100
ND/ 5
ND/50
ND/50
ND/2.5
1 ND/ 5 ,
I ND/2. 5
-------
scharger:
Tittabawassee River
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION V
EASTERN DISTRICT OFFICE
Sample Type: 8 C-8 hour flow proportioned composite
24C-24 hour flow proportioned composite
pie Date: 7/25/84 Sediment Analyses Tn c Evu-tquai volume composite
7/?7/ft4 TR~5 G-Grab
' ' Station #: TR-1 TR-2 TR-3 TR-4 un^r^m TR-6 TR-7 TR-8 TR-9
Sample Type
Time
Samole Number 84ER04
Date
Parameter
Above
Ash
Pond
G
1610
SOI
7/25/84
ug/kg
(ppb)
II. ACID AND BASE NEUTRAL POLLUTANTS
2 ,4 ,6-trichlorophenol
4-chl oro-3-methyl phenol
2-chlorophenol
2,4-d1chlorophenol
2, 4-dimethyl phenol
2-nitrophenol
4-nitrophenol
2,4-dinitrophenol
4 ,6-di ni tro-2-methyl phenol
Pentachlorophenol
Phenol
Benzoic acid
2-methyl phenol
4-methyl phenol
2 ,4 ,5-trichl orophenol
Acenaphthene
Benzidine
1,2,4-trlchlorobenzene
Rexachl orobenzene
Hexachloroethane
Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether
ND/10
ND/20
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
ND/20
ND/100
ND/50
ND/20
ND/20
ND/10
ND/100
ND/10
ND/10
ND/100
ND/10
ND/40
ND/10
ND/10"
ND/10
ND/10
Below
Ash
Pond
G
1700
S02
7/25/84
ug/kg
(ppb)
ND/10
ND/20
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
ND/20
ND/100
ND/50
ND/20
ND/20
ND/10
ND/100
ND/10
ND/10
ND/100
ND/10
ND/40
ND/10
N0710
ND/10
ND/10
Above
Llngle
Drain
G
1900
SOS
7/25/84
ug/kg
(ppb)
ND/10
ND/20
ND/10"
ND/10
ND/10
ND/20
ND/100
ND/50
ND/20
ND/20
ND/10
ND/100
ND/10
ND/10
ND/100
ND/10
ND/40
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
At
Smith's
Crossing
G
2010
S05
7/25/84
ug/kg
(ppb)
ND/10
ND/20
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
ND/20
ND/100
ND/50
ND/20
ND/20
ND/10
ND/100
ND/10
ND/10
ND/100
ND/10
ND/40
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
of Brown
Mill's
Run
G
2050
S07
7/25/84
ug/kg
(ppb)
ND/10
ND/20 .
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
ND/20
ND/100
ND/50
ND/20
ND/20
ND/10
ND/100
ND/10
ND/10
ND/100
ND/10
ND/40
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
At
Free! and
Road
G
0840
SOS
7/27/84
ug/kg
(ppb)
ND/10
ND/20
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
ND/20
ND/100
ND/50
ND/20
ND/20
ND/10
ND/100
ND/10
ND/10
ND/100
ND/10
ND/40
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
At
Titta.
Road
G
0920
S09
7/27/84
ug/kg
(ppb)
ND/10
ND/20
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
ND/20
ND/100
ND/50
ND/20
ND/20
ND/10
ND/100
ND/10
ND/:O
NO/: oo
ND/10
ND/40
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
At
Gratiot
Road
G
0945
S12
7/27/84
ug/kg
(ppb)
ND/10
ND/20
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
ND/20
ND/100
ND/50
ND/20
ND/20
ND/10
ND/100
ND/10
ND/10
ND/100
ND/10
ND/40
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
At
Center
Road
G
0850
S13
7/27/84
ug/kg
(ppb)
ND/10
ND/20
NO/10
ND/10
ND/10
ND/20
ND/100
ND/50
ND/2Q
ND/20
ND/10
ND/100
ND/10
ND/10
ND/100
ND/10
ND/40
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
-------
icharger:
Tittabawassee River
nple Date: 7/25/84
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION V
EASTERN DISTRICT OFFICE
Sediment Analyses
Sample Type;
TR-5
8 C-8 hour flow proportioned composite
24C-24 hour flow proportioned composite
EYC-Equal volume composite
G-Grab
""'** ,tat,nn #. TP.l TR-? TR-3 TR-4 ,^^MM TR-6 TR-7 TR-8 TR-9
Sample Type
Time
Sample Number QAFDHA
Date
Parameter
II. ACID AND BASE NEUTRAL POL
2-chloronaphtha ene i
1 ,2-d1chlorobenzene
1 ,3-dichlorobenzene
1 ,4-dichlorobenzene
3,3*-dichlorobenzidine
2, 4-dinitro toluene
2, 6-d1n1tro toluene
1 ,2-dlphenyl hydrazlne
Fluoranthene
4-chloro
4-bromo
Bis(2-c
p
l
phenyl phenyl ether
lenyl p lenyl ether
lorolsopropyl Jether
Bl sl 2-chl oroethoxy )me thane
Hexachl orobutadf ene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
Isophorone
Napithalene
Nitrobenzene
N-nltrosodlmethylamlne
N-nitrosodl phenyl ami ne
N-nitrosodlprop yamine
Bis 2-ethyl lexyl Jphthalate
Above
Ash
Pond
G
1610
sni
7/25/84
ug/kg
(nob) l ... .
Below
Ash
Pond
G
1700
SO?
7/25/84
ug/kg
(DDb)
mm (
-------
.charger:
Tittabawassee River
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION Y
EASTERN DISTRICT OFFICE
Sample Type;
iple Date: 7/25/84
7/27/84
Station #
Sediment Analyses
TR-1 TR-2 TR-3
TR-5
TR-4
TR-6
8 C-8 hour flow proportioned composite
24C-24 hour flow proportioned composite
EYC-Equal volume composite
G-Grab
TR-7 TR-8 TR-9
Sample Type
Time
Sample Number 84FR04
Date
Parameter
Above
Ash
i Pnnd
G
1610
5501
7/25/84
ug/kg
(DDb)
Below
Ash
Pond
G
1700
SO?
7/25/84
ug/kg
(DDb)
II. ACID AND BASE NEUTRAL POLLUTANT^ (continued
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Di ethyl phtialate
Dimethyl phthalate
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzol a )pyrene
Benzol b & k)fluoranthene
Benzo( k ) f 1 uoranthene
Chrysene
Acenapnthylene
Anthracene
Benzo(ghi)perylene
Fluorene
Phenanthrene
Dibenzo( a, h) anthracene
Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
Pyrene
'Aniline
Benzyl alcohol
4-chloroani ine
Dibenzofuran
ND/10
10J*
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
ND/20
ND/20
ND/20
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
ND/20
ND/10
ND/10
ND/20
ND/20
ND/10
ND/10"
MO/20
ND/50
ND/10
ND/10
wn/io
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
ND/20
ND/20
ND/20
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
ND/20
ND/10
ND/10
ND/20
ND/20
ND/10
Mb/10
NO/20
ND/50
ND/10
Above
L ingle
Drain
G
1900
S03
7/25/84
ug/kg
(DDb)
ND/10
840
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
ND/20
ND/20
ND/20
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
ND/20
ND/10
ND/10
ND/20
ND/20
ND/10
MD/10
MO/20
ND/50
ND/10
At
Smith's
r^-nQcing
G
2010
SOS
7/25/84
ug/kg
(DDb)
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
ND/20
ND/20
ND/20
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
ND/20
ND/10
ND/10
ND/20
ND/20
ND/10
ND/lO
MD/20
ND/50
ND/10
of Brown
Mill's
Run
G
2050
S07
7/25/84
ug/kg
(DDb)
ND/10
wn/io
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
ND/20
ND/20
ND/20
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
ND/20
ND/10
ND/10
ND/20
ND/20
ND/10
ND/10
ND/20
ND/50
ND/10
At
Freel and
Road
G
0840
508
7/27/84
ug/kg
(DDb)
ND/10
Kin/io
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
ND/20
ND/20
ND/20
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
ND/20
ND/10
ND/10
ND/20
ND/20
ND/10
ND/10
ND/20
ND/50
ND/10
At
Titta.
Road
G
0920
S09
7/27/84
ug/kg
(DDb)
ND/10
Nn/io
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
ND/20
ND/20
ND/20
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
ND/20
ND/10
ND/10
ND/20
ND/20
ND/10
ND/10
ND/20
ND/50
ND/10
At
Gratiot
Road
G
0945
S12
7/27/84
ug/kg
(DDb)
ND/10
Nn/io
NP/IQ
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
ND/20
ND/20
ND/20
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
ND/20
ND/10
ND/10
ND/20
ND/20
ND/10
ND/10
ND/20
ND/50
NP/IQ
At
Center
Road
G
0850
S13
7/27/84
ug/kg
(DDb)
ND/10
Nn/in
Kin/io
10.1*
Kin/10
ND/10
ND/20
ND/20
ND/20
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
ND/20
ND/10
ND/10
ND/20
ND/20
ND/10
ND/10
ND/20
ND/50
NO/10
-------
scharger:
mple Date:
Tittabawassee River
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION Y
EASTERN DISTRICT OFFICE
7/25/84
7/27/84
Station #: TR-1
Sediment Analyses
TR-2 TR-3 TR-4
Sample Type: 8 C-8 hour flow proportioned composit
24C-24 hour flow proportioned composit
EVC-Equal volume composite
TR-5 G-Grab
Uostream TR-6 TR-7 TR-8 TR-9
Sample Type
Time
Samole Number 84ER04
Date
Parameter
Above
Ash
Pond
G
1610
SOI
7/25/84
ug/kg
(ppb)
Below
Ash
Pond
G
1700
S02
7/25/84
ug/kg
(ppb)
II. ACID AND BASE NEUTRAL POLLUTANTS {continued
2-methyl naphtha"! ene
-mtroaniiine
3-nitroaniline
4-nitroanlline
ND/20
NO/100
ND/100
ND/100
ND/20
ND/100
ND/100
NO/100
Above
Lingle
Drain
G
1900
SOS
7/25/84
ug/kg
(ppb)
ND/*0
ND/100
ND/100
ND/100
At
Smith's
Crossina
G
2010
S05
7/25/84
ug/kg
(ppb)
ND/20
ND/100
ND/100
ND/100
)f Brown
Mill's
Run
G
2050
S07
7/25/84
ug/kg
(ppb)
ND/20
ND/100
ND'/lOO
ND/100
At
:reel and
Road
G
0840
SOS
7/27/84
ug/kg
(ppb)
HD/20
ND/100
ND/100
ND/100
At
Titta.
Road
G
0920
S09
7/27/84
ug/kg
(ppb)
ND/20
ND/100
ND/100
ND/100
At
Gratiot
Road
G
0945
S12
7/27/84
ug/kg
(ppb)
ND/20
ND/100
ND/100
ND/100
At
Center
Road
G
0850
S13
7/27/84
ug/kg
(ppb)
ND/20
ND/100
ND/1UU
ND/100
-------
scharger:
mple Date:
Tittabawassee River
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION V
EASTERN DISTRICT OFFICE
Sample Type;
7/25/84
7/27/84
Sediment Analyses
Station #: TR-1
TR-2
TR-3
TR-4
TR-5
Upstream
TR-6
8 C-8 hour flow proportioned composite
24C-24 hour flow proportioned composite
EVC-Equal volume composite
G-Grab
TR-7 TR-8 TR-9
Sample Type
Time
Sample Number 84ER04
Date
Parameter
III. PCB/PESTICIDE POLLUTANTS
Aldrin
Dieldrin
Chlordane
4, 4 l -DDT
4, 4 '-DDE
4, 4' -ODD
Alpha-endosulfan
Beta-endosulfan
Endosulfan sulfate
Endrin
Endrln aldehyde
Heptachlor
Heptachlor epoxide
Alpha-BHC
Beta-BHC
Gamma-BHC
Delta-BHC
PCB-1242
PCB-1254
PCB-1221
PCB-1232
PCB-1248
PCB-1260
PCB-1016
Toxaphene
Above
Ash
Pond
G
1610
SOI
7/25/84
ug/kg
(ppb)
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
14
20
15
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
Below
Ash
Pond
G
1700
S02
7/25/84
ug/kg
(ppb)
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
17
19
14
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.6
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
Above
Llngle
Drain
G
1900
SOS
7/25/84
ug/kg
(DDb)
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
R.3
19
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
At
Smith's
Crosslna
G
2010
SOB
7/25/84
ug/kg
(ppb)
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
wn/4.n
l?
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
MD/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
of Brown
Mill's
Run
G
2050
S07
7/25/84
ug/kg
(ppb)
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
wn/d.n
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
wn/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
At
Freeland
Road
G
0840
SOS
7/27/84
ug/kg
(ppb)
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
Mn/4_n
wn/d.n
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
Nn/4.n
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
Np/4,0
At
Titta.
Road
G
0920
S09
7/27/84
ug/kg
(ppb)
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
Mn/4.n
Mn/4.n
Kin/4.0
wn/4.n
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
Nn/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
wn/4.n
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
At
Gratlot
Road
G
0945
S12
7/27/84
ug/kg
(ppb)
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
Mn/4 . n
wn/4.n
NH/4.0
wn/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
un/4.n
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
wn/4 n
Nn/4.n
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
NO/4.0
At
Center
Road
G
0850
S13
7/27/84
ug/kg
(ppb)
NO/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
Mn/4 n
wn/4.n
Kin/4.0
wn/4.n
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
NH/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
Mn/4 n
Mn/4.n
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
Kin//i n
wn/4.n
wn/4.0
MD/4.0
ND/4.0
Nn/4.o
-------
ischarger:
ample Date:
Tittabawassee River
7/25/84
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION V
EASTERN DISTRICT OFFICE
Sediment Analyses
Sample Type:
TR-5
8 C-8 hour flow proportioned composit
24C-24 hour flow proportioned composit
EVC-Equal volume composite
G-Grab
/ C-l /Ot _ .
Station i
Sample Type
Time
Samole Number 84ER04
Date
Parameter
IV. METALS**
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Manganese
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
?: TR-1 TR-2 TR-3 TR-4 ,,nqtr.Min TR-6 TR-7 TR-8 TR-9
Above
Ash
Pond
G
1610
SOI
7/25/84
mg/kg
(ppm)
1460C
ND/0.3
1.5
20. 2C
ND/.05
0.08
5.40
1.70
7.68C
3490C
228
3.05
0.13
ND/.15
ND/0.1
3.50
17.6C
Below
Ash
Pond
G
1700
S02
7/25/84
mg/kg
(ppm)
1810C
ND/0.3
1.6
22. 5C
ND/.05
0.20
6.5
1.95
9.98C
4100C
195
3.55
0.10
ND/.15
ND/0.1
4.55
26. <5C
Above
L ingle
Drain
G
1900
S03
7/25/84
mg/kg
(ppm)
1450C
ND/0.3
1.5
15. 1C
ND/.05
0.08
5.80
1.80
6.78C
3450C
147
3.15
ND/0.1
ND/.15
ND/0.1
3.85
22. 6C
At
Smith's
Crossing
G
2010
SOS
7/25/84
mg/kg
(ppm)
2180C
ND/0.3
1.8
23. OC
0.08
0.11
6.05
2.20
9.08C
4710C
137
4.75
0.11
ND/.15
ND/0.1
5.76
22. 3C
of Brown
Mill's
Run
G
2050
S07
7/25/84
mg/kg
(ppm)
496C
ND/0.3
0.86
4.83C
ND/.05
ND/.02
2.65
0.80
1.13C
1820C
96.5
1.20
ND/0.1
MD/.15
ND/0.1
1.75
10. OC
At
Freeland
Road
G
0840
S08
7/27/84
mg/kg
(ppm)
596C
ND/0.3
1.1
5.03C
ND/.05
MD/..02
4.20
1.00
1.93C
1900C
75.5
1.60
ND/0.1
ND/.15
ND/0.1
2.25
13. 5C
At
Titta.
Road
G
0920
S09
7/27/84
mg/kg
(ppm)
373C
wn/0.3
0.68
4. sac
ND/.05
0.08
2.65
0.75
2.28C
1150C
45.3
ND/.75
ND/0.1
ND/.15
ND/0.1
1.10
29. 9C
At
Gratiot
Road
G
0945
S12
7/27/84
mg/kg
(ppm)
40or
wn/o.3
0.70
4. oar.
ND/.05
ND/.025.
2.75
0.75
3.38C
1130C
39.9
1.20
ND/0.1
ND/.15
ND/0.1
1.15
9.54C
At
Center
Road
G
0850
S13
7/27/84
mg/kg
(ppm)
.rw.
wn/o.3
?.?ar
MH/.05
ND/.025
3.05
MD/0.5
2.33C
993C
35.5
0.80
ND/0.1
ND/.15
ND/0.1
0.80
8.99C
-------
scharger:
mple Date:
Tittabawassee River
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION V
EASTERN DISTRICT OFFICE
Sample Type:
7/25/84
7/27/84
Sediment Analyses
Station #: TR-1
TR-2
TR-3
TR-4
TR-5
Upstream
TR-6
8 C-8 hour flow proportioned composite
24C-24 hour flow proportioned composite
EVC-Equal volume composite
G-Grab
TR-7 TR-8 TR-9
Sample Type
Time
Sample Number 84ER04
Date
Parameter
V. DIOXINS AND FURANS
2378-TCDD
Total Tetra CDDs
Total Penta CDDs
Total Hexa CDDs
Total Hepta CDDs
OCDD
23/8-TCDF
Total Tetra CDFs
Total Penta CDFs
Total Hexa CDFs
Total Hepta CDFs
OCDF
Above
Ash
Pond
G
1610
SOI
7/25/84
ng/g
(ODD)
ND/0.03
ND/0.01
ND/0.03
ND/0.03
0.11
0.47
ND/0.03
ND/0.03
ND/0.03
ND/0.03
0.06
0.17
Below
Ash
Pond
G
1700
S02
7/25/84
ng/g
(DDb)
ND/0.01
ND/0.01
ND/0.01
ND/0.01
0.02
0.08
ND/0.01
ND/0.01
ND/0.01
ND/0.01
0.01
0.02
Above
Lingle
Drain
G
1900
S03
7/25/84
ng/g
(DDb)
ND/0.01
0.15
ND/0.01
0.02
0.29
1.6
0.01
2.7
0.02
0.03
0.16
0.30
At
Smith's
Crossina
G
2010
S05**
7/25/84
ng/g
(DDb)
ND/0.01
0.08
0.03
0.11
1.1
6.8
0.10
0.43
0.20
0.37
1.3
3.0
of Brown
Mill's
Run
G
2050
S07**
7/25/84
ng/g
(DDb)
ND/0.01
0.01
ND/0.01
ND/0.01
0.03
0.26
0.02
0.19
ND/0.01
ND/0.01
0.04
0.10
At
Free! and
Road
G
0840
SOS
7/27/84
ng/g
(DDb)
ND/0.01
0.02
ND/0.01
0.01
0.05
0.25
0.03
0.20
0.02
0.05
0.07
0.07
At
Ti tta .
Road
G
0920
S09**
7/27/84
ng/g
(DDb)
ND/0.01
0.01
ND/0.01
ND/0.01
0.05
0.46
0.02
0.13
ND/0.01
0.02
0.05
0.12
At
Gratiot
Road
G
0945
S12
7/27/84
ng/g
(DDb)
ND/0.02
ND/0.02
NP/0.05
ND/0.07
ND/0.04
0.33
0.03
1.4
ND/0.03
ND/0.03
ND/0.04
0.08
At
Center
Road
G
0850
S13
7/27/84
ng/g
(DDb)
ND/0.01
ND/0.01
ND/0.03
ND/0.03
ND/0.04
0.30
ND/0.02
0.09
ND/0.03
ND/0.03
0.03
0.10
-------
NOTES:
1. ND = Compound was analyzed for but not detected. Value reported is the detection limit.
2. * = Presence of compound may be due to sample bottle preparation, field and/or labora-
tory contamination. Methylene chloride is used as a cleaning agent for sample
bottles. Phthalate compounds are components of certain plastics and are widespread
in the environment at low levels.
3. ** = Data reported on wet weight basis.
4. J = Estimated value, detected below minimum specified contract detection limit but
greater than zero.
5. C = Blank corrected.
6. ug/kg = microgram per kilogram.
7. mg/kg = milligram per kilogram.
8. ppb = parts per billion.
9. ppm = parts per million.
10. ng/g = nanogram per gram.
-------
Ischarger:
ample Date:
7/25-27/84
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION V
EASTERN DISTRICT OFFICE
THtabawassee River Flood Plain Analyses
Sample Type: 8 C-8 hour flow proportioned composite
24C-24 hour flow proportioned composite
EYC-Equal volume composite
G-Grab
Cation #: FP-1 FP-2 FP-3
Sample Type
Time
Sample Number 84ER04
Date
Parameter
I. VOLATILES
Acrolefn
Acrylonltrlle
Benzene
;arbon tetrachioride
Chlorobenzene
,Z-dlchloroetnane
,1 ,1-trlchloroethane
,1-dichl oroethane
,1 ,2-trlchl oroethane
.,1,2 ,2-tetracni oroetnane
Chi oroethane
Bl s( chl oromethyl ) ether
2-chloroethyl vinyl ether
Chloroform
,.1-dlchloroethene
Trans-1 .Z-dlchloroethene
L,2-dlchloropropane
Trans-1 ,3-dlchloropropene
:is-l,3-dlchloropropene
Ethyl benzene
Methyl ene chloride
Chl orome thane
At Dow
Tertiary
Pond
G
1550
S04
7/26/84
ug/kg
(ppb)
KID/50
ND/50
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5j
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/ 5
ND/2.5
85*
_JjD/2_.5_
At Waite
& Debolt
Drain
G
1940
S06
7/25/84
ug/kg
(ppb)
ND/5Q
ND/50
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
Nb/2.5
ND/2.5
MD/2.b
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
MD/i.S
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/ 5 i
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
At
Titta.
Road
G
0915
S10
7/27/84
ug/kg
(ppb)
_NQ/100
ND/100
5J
ND/ 5
ND/ 5
ND/ 5
NO/ 5
ND/ 5
Mb/ 5
HD7 5
ND/ 5
ND/ b
ND/ 5
ND/ 5
1 ND/ 5 1
ND/ 5
ND/ 5
ND/ 5
ND/10
ND/ 5
9500*
ND/ 5
[Refer to notes page for explanation of data qualifiers and acronyms.]
-------
ischarger:
ample Date:
7/25-27/84
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION V
EASTERN DISTRICT OFFICE
Tittabawassee River Flood Plain Analyses
Sample Type: 8 C-8 hour flow proportioned composit
24C-24 hour flow proportioned composit
EVC-Equal volume composite
G-Grab
Station #• f^-1 FP-? Fp-3
Sample Type
Time
Sample Number 84ER04
Date
Parameter
I. YOLATILES (continued)
Bromome thane
Bromoform
Bromodichloromethane
Trichl orofluoromethane
Dlchlorodlfluoromethane
Chi orodi bromomethane
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Trichl oroethene
Vinyl chloride
Acetone
2-butanone
Carbon disultide
2-hexanone
4-methyl -2-pentanone
Styrene
Vinyl acetate
Total xylenes
At Dow
Tertiary
Pond
G
1550
S04
7/26/84
ug/kg
(ppb)
ND/Z.b
ND/Z . b
ND/Z.b
ND/2.b
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/50
ND/100
ND/ 5
ND/50
ND/50
ND/2.5
NO/ 5
ND/2.5
At Waite
& Debolt
Drain
G
1940
S06
7/25/84
ug/kg
(ppb)
ND/Z.b
ND/Z.b
ND/Z.b
ND/Z.b
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/2.5
ND/50
ND/100
ND/ 5
ND/50
ND/50
ND/2.5
ND/ 5
ND/Z.b
At
Titta.
Road
G
0915
S10
7/27/84
ug/kg
(ppb)
ND/ b
ND/ b
ND/ b
ND/ 5
ND/ 5
ND/ 5
ND/ 5
ND/ 5
ND/ 5
ND/ 5
ND/lOiL
ND/200
ND/10
ND/100
ND/100
ND/ 5
ND/10
5J
-~~
•
• --
••^•— -
• • mi i • 1 1 —
-• •• ' "*
-------
scharger:
mple Date:
7/25-27/84
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION V
EASTERN DISTRICT OFFICE
Tittabawassee River Flood Plain Analyses
Sample Type: 8 C-8 hour flow proportioned composite
24C-24 hour flow proportioned composite
EVC-Equal volume composite
G-Grab
Station #
FP-1
FP-2
FP-3
Sample Type
Time
Samole Number 84ER04
Date
Parameter
At Dow
Tertiary
Pnnrl
G
1550
SQ4
7/26/84
ug/kg
(nob)
II. ACID AND BASE NEUTRAL POLLUTANTS
2 ,4 ,6-trichl orophenol
4-chl oro-3-methyl phenol
2-chl orophenol
2, 4-dichl orophenol
2, 4-dimethyl phenol
2-nitrophenol
4-nitrophenol
2,4-dlnltrophenol
4, 6-dlnltro-2-methyl phenol
Pentachl orophenol
Phenol
Benzole acid
2-methyl phenol
4-methyl phenol
2 ,4 ,5-trlchl orophenol
Acenaphthene
Benzldlne
1 ,2,4-trlchlorobenzene
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachloroethane
Bis(2-ch1oroethy1)ether
Kin/in
ND/20
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
ND/20
ND/100
ND/50
ND/20
ND/20
ND/10
ND/100
ND/10
ND/10
ND/100
ND/10
ND/40
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
At Walte
& Debolt
Drain
G
1940
S06
7/25/84
ug/kg
(ppbl
ND/10
ND/20
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
ND/20
ND/100
ND/50
ND/20
ND/20
ND/10
ND/100
ND/10
ND/10
ND/100
ND/10
ND/40
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
At
Tltta.
Rnarl
G
0915
S10
7/27/84
ug/kg
(ppbi
ND/10
ND/20
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
ND/20
ND/100
ND/50
ND/20
ND/20
ND/10
ND/100
ND/10
ND/10
ND/100
ND/10
ND/40
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
-------
ischarger:
ample Date:
7/25-27/84
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION Y
EASTERN DISTRICT OFFICE
Tittabawassee River Flood Plain Analyses
Sample Type
8 C-8 hour flow proportioned composU
24C-24 hour flow proportioned composlt
EVC-Equal volume composite
G-Grab
Station if- CD-1 Fp-9 FP-?
Sample Type
Time
Sample Number 84ER04
Date
Parameter
II. ACID AND BASE NEUTRAL POLL
2-chl oronaphthalene
1,2-dichlorobenzene
1 ,3-dichlorobenzene
1 ,4-dichlorobenzene
3,3*-dichlorobenzidine
2,4-dinitrotoluene
2, 6-dlnitro toluene
1,2-di phenyl hydrazine
Fluoranthene
4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether
4-bromophenyl pnenyl ether
Bi s( 2-chl oroi sopropyl ) ether
Bi s( 2-chl oroethoxy )me thane
Hexachl orobutadiene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
Isophorone
Naphthalene
Nitrobenzene
N-nitrosodimethylamine
N-ni trosodi phenyl ami ne
N-nitrosodi )roplyamine
Bis(2-ethyl iexy' Jphthalate
At Dow
Tertiary
Pnnrt
G
1550
end
7/26/84
ug/kg
(ppb)
.UTANTS Tc
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
ND/20
ND/20
ND/20
ND/20
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
ND/20
ND/20
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
NU/iU
ND/10
At Waite
& Debolt
Drain
G
1940
SQfi
7/25/84
ug/kg
(ppt^
Continued
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
ND/20
ND/20
ND/20
ND/20
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
ND/20
ND/20
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
nu/cV
•ND/10
At
Titta.
Road
G
0915
S1Q
7/27/84
ug/kg
(pob)
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
ND/20
ND/20
ND/20
ND/20
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
ND/20 |
ND/20
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
kin /9n
NU/^U
10J
__. ._._-- —
-------
ischarger:
ample Date: 7/25-27/84
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION Y
EASTERN DISTRICT OFFICE
Sample Type:
Tittabawassee River Flood Plain Analyses
8 C-8 hour flow proportioned composite
24C-24 hour flow proportioned composite
EYC-Equal volume composite
G-Grab
Station #
FP-1
FP-2
FP-3
Sample Type
Time
Sample Number 84ER04
Date
Parameter
At Dow
Tertiary
Pond
G
1550
S04
7/26/84
ug/kg
(ppb)
At Waite
& Debolt
Drain
G
1940
S06
7/25/84
ug/kg
(ppb)
11. ACID AND 6AS£ NEUTRAL POLLUTANTS (continued
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Dl-n-butyl phthalate
01-n-octyl phthalate
Diethyl phthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
Benzol a) anthracene
Benzol a)pyrene
Benzol b 1 k)fluoranthene
Benzol Ic ) f 1 uoranthene
Chrysene
Acenaphthylene
Anthracene
Benzo( ghl ) peryl ene
Fluorene
Phenanthrene
Dlbenzo(a,h)anthracene
lndeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
Pyrene
Aniline
Benzyl alcohol
4-chloroanlHne
Dlbenzofuran
ND/10
ND/10
450
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
ND/20
ND/20
ND/20
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
ND/20
ND/10
ND/10
ND/20
MD/20
ND/10
ND/10
ND/20
ND/50
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
3100
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
ND/20
ND/20
ND/20
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
ND/20
ND/10
ND/10
ND/20
ND/20
ND/10
ND/10
ND/20
ND/50
ND/10
At
Titta.
Road
G
0915
S10
7/27/84
ug/kg
(ppb)
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
ND/20
ND/20
ND/20
ND/10
ND/10
ND/10
ND/20
ND/10
ND/10
ND/20
ND/20
ND/10
ND/10
ND/20
ND/50
ND/10
-------
scharger:
imple Date:
7/25-27/84
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION V
EASTERN DISTRICT OFFICE
Tittabawassee River Flood Plain Analyses
Sample Type;
8 C-8 hour flow proportioned compositi
24C-24 hour flow proportioned composit
EYC-Equal volume composite
G-Grab
Station #: FP-1 FP-2 FP-3
Sample Type
Time
Sample Number 84ER04
Date
Parameter
!I. ACID AND BASE NEUTRAL POL
2-methyl naphtha! ene
2-nitroaniline
3-nitroaniline
4-nitroaniline
At Dow
Tertiary
Pond
G
1550
S04
7/26/84
ug/kg
(ppb)
At Waite
& Debolt
Drain
G
1940
S06
7/25/84
ug/kg
(ppb)
UTANTS (continued
ND/20
ND/100
NO/100
ND/100
ND/20
NO/100
ND/100
ND/100
At
Titta.
Road
G
0915
S10
7/27/84
ug/kg
(ppb)
ND/20
ND/100
ito/100
ND/100
-------
scharger:
smple Date:
7/25-27/84
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION V
EASTERN DISTRICT OFFICE
Tlttabawassee River Flood Plain Analyses
Sample Type: 8 C-8 hour flow proportioned composite
24C-24 hour flow proportioned composite
EVC-Equal volume composite
G-Grab
Station #: FP-1 FP-2 FP-3
Sample Type
Time
Sample Number 84ER04
Date
Parameter
III. PCB/PESTICIDE POLLUTANTS
AldHn
DieldHn
Chlordane
4, 4 '-DDT
4,4'-DDE
4, 4 '-ODD
Alplia-endosulfan
Beta-endosulfan
Endosulfan sulfate
Endrin
Endrin aldehyde
Heptachlor
Heptachlor epoxide
Alpha-BHC
Beta-BHC
Gamma-BHC
Dena-BHC
PCB-1242
PCB-I254
PCB-1221
PCB-1232
PCB-1248
PCB-1260
PCB-1016
Toxaphene
At Dow
Tertiary
Pnnrt
G
1550
S04
7/26/84
ug/kg
(ppb)
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
6.6
ND/4.0
7.3
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
At Waite
& Debolt
Drain
G
1940
S06
7/25/84
ug/kg
(ppb)
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
88
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
At
Titta.
Rnflrt
G
0915
S10
7/27/84
ug/kg
(ppb)
Nb/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
31
43
13
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
Nb>4.6
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4.0
ND/4,0,,.
-------
scharger:
;mple Date:
7/25-27/84
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION V
EASTERN DISTRICT OFFICE
Tittabawassee River Flood Plain Analyses
Sample Type:
8 C-8 hour flow proportioned composit
24C-24 hour flow proportioned composit
EVC-Equal volume composite
G-Grab
Station #: FP-1
FP-2
FP-3
Sample Type
Time
Sample Number 84ER04
Date
Parameter
IV. METALS**
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Manqanese
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
At Dow
Tertiary
Pond
G
1550
S04
7/26/84
mg/kg
(ppm)
4300C
ND/.3
3.9
53. 4C
0.21
0.25
11.7
3.35
20. OC
16700C
381
7.80
0.18
ND/.15
ND/.l
9.70
48. 4C
At Waite
& Debolt
Drain
G
1940
S06
7/25/84
mg/kg
(ppm)
4300C
ND/.3
4.7
54. OC
0.25
0.25
12.5
3.8
17. 1C
9516C
579
8.50
0.16
ND/.3
ND/.l
10.6
51. 5C
At
Titta.
Road
6
0915
S10
7/27/84
mg/kg
(ppm)
4030C
ND/.3
4.0
47. 6C
0.17
0.24
11.5
3.40
18. OC
8&20C
423
7.70
0.18
0.31
ND/.l
9.70
53. 2C
-------
APPENDIX B-6
PCDDs and PCDFs
1984 USEPA Study
-------
Data Report X
Table V: Second Stage Analysis of Sediment and Sludge for TCOD
by the Absolute Intensity Method
by GLC/HRMS
ID# Nature of Sample Sample Wt. Conc(ppt)1 Cone, at2 dl 1 320/3
100% rec 1 322
•
UN 160 Sediment
UN 161
UN 162
UN 163
UN 164
UN 165
UN 166 Sludge
UN 167
UN 168
UN 169
UN 170
UN 171
UN 172 Water
UN 173
9.13
9.46
9.75
9.02
9.36 ;
10,15
9.27
10.23
4.85
7.23
9.50
4.08
199.
181
ndH
nd
nd
nd
nd
nd
nd
nd
97
3500
280
170 *
nd
.23 .
8
41
12
680
48
10
8
8
T60 12
5800 56
470 10
283 48
.25
.38 .2
-
.215
1.635
2.005
1.965
-
.966
.SO6
.78
.78
.80
.79
2.165
.84
1. ppt = parts per trillion
2. Corrected by assuming a recovery of 60% based on results of blanks run with
these samples.
3. Theoretical value: 0.771 .10
4. Peak observed at m/z 322 only
5. Peak observed at m/z 320 and 322 but isotope ratio incorrect
6. Small signals were detected at approximately 8 ppt which may indicate a
positive. Validation of samples at this level is sometimes difficult.
-------
Mr. Michael Dellarco
Page 3
August 5, 1980
The results of attempts to validate the positive samples found in Tables
I through III are reported in Table VI. Of the four samples that we recorded
as positive in the first three tables, none could be confirmed using the
m/z 320: m/z 322 isotope ratio. We feel that there may be positives among
this set of samples; however, the positives are below the recorded detection
limits.
The first results of the monkey tissue analyses are contained in Table VII.
These samples were extracted by Pat O'Keefe at the New York State Department
of Health. As you can see, a significant fraction of the samples contain
readily measured concentrations of TCDO. We have asked Pat O'Keefe to send
to us an extraction procedure, and when we receive it, I will forward a copy
to you to be appended to this report. You asked about concentration of
PCB's in these samples. The remainder of the samples show no evidence for
this contaminant. We can conclude that the level of PCB must be considerably
less than 1000 times the reported TCDD concentration. That means that if
the TCDD concentration is 100 parts per trillion or the detection limit 1s
100 parts per trillion, the maximum amount of PCB in the sample would be
100 parts per billion. Of course, this does not mean that no PCB's were
in the original sample. Recall that the clean-up procedure 1s designed to
minimize PCB contamination.
We have arranged our priorities for extraction in the near future and have
begun with the extraction of the four fish samples submitted to us from
Hemlock, Michigan.
If you have questions on any of these analyses, please give me a call.
Sincerely yours,
Michael L. Gross
Professor
MLGcep
-------
Department of Chemistry
Lincoln. NE 68588
The University of Nebraska-Lincoln 402-472-3501
August 5, 1980
Mr. Michael Dellarco
Special Pesticides Review
CM-2, Room 711K
TS 791
401 M Street, SW
Washington, DC 20460
Dear Mike:
This letter constitutes the cover for Data Report X. The report consists of
Table I for UN Series Samples 191 to 204, Table II for UN Series Samples 185
to 188A, Table III for UN Series Samples 118 and 127, Tables IV and V for
UN Series Samples 159 to 173.
•
The first analyses of the biological samples contained in Table I showed that
all samples clearly contained no detectable levels of TCDD except for Sample
UN-204. However, the attempt to validate UN-204 by measuring the isotope
ratio of m/z 320 and m/z 322 was not successful, and therefore the sample must
be considered to contain a not detectable amount of TCDD. However, it is
possible that there is a very low level concentration of TCDD in this sample.
It may be worth further investigation. The detection limits for these
samples ranged from two to eight parts per trillion except for UN-193 which
gave a detection limit of 18 parts per trillion. This detection limit is
high because of the poor recovery for the sample. As I mentioned in my last
letter, we are reextracting samples UN-193, 197, 202. 203, and 204.
Among the samples reported in Table 2, one was found to contain TCDD on the
first stage of analysis. This sample, UN-188A, cannot be validated according
to the isotopic ratio measurements (see Table 6). You will note that some
of the samples in this table gave rather high detection limits. This is
because of the small samples sizes, less than one gram. Also included among
these samples is a Water Pick Cartridge which we purchased at a local
distributor and which we used as a validation sample to check for recovery
and for background level. The recovery for this analysis was 2Q% with a
detection limit of 12 parts per trillion. This result should be compared with
Sample UN-185 for which a recovery of 50% was obtained. We feel that the
low recovery for the new Water Pick Cartridge may be largely due to some
chromatography problems which we have recently solved, rather than a matrix
problem. Therefore, we feel we are in a position to analyze the remainder of
these filters if you wish. Please advise!
In this data report, we present results on a set of sludge and sediment samples
(Table IV and V). These samples were analyzed in two stages. The first stage
employed the conventional method wherein we monitor m/z 322 and m/z 334 (the
C-13 internal standard). The results of the first stage of analysis of these
samples (Table IV) showed these matrices were extremely difficult to handle.
T>>n i inivor^itv of Nebraska Medical Cer
-------
Samples Obtained by USEPA Region V
October 1978
T1ttabawassee/Sag1naw Rivers; Dow Chemical - Midland Plant
USEPA-Reglon V UML
Sample Number Number Sample Site
Tittabawassee River/Saglnaw River Sediments
EA06S12 UN159 Tittabawassee River - Dow Chemical Bridge Upstream
of Dow Dam
EA06S13A UN160 Tittabawassee River - near Smith's Crossing Road
EA06S13B UN161 Tittabawassee River - near Smith«s Crossing Road
EA06S14 UN162 Tittabawassee River - at Free!and Road
EA06S15 UN163 Tittabawassee River - at Center Road Upstream from
Saginaw
EA06S16 UN164 Saginaw River - 1-75 at ZHwaukee
EA06S17 UN165 Saginaw River - Salzburg Road at Bay City
Dow Chemical Sludges/Wastewaters
EA06S18A UN166 Phenol Treatment System - Waste Primary Sludge
EA06S18B UN167 Phenol Treatment System - Waste Primary Sludge
EA06S19 UN168 Phenol Treatment System - Waste Activated Sludge
EA06S24 UN169 General Treatment System - Waste Primary Sludge
EA06S2S UN170 General Treatment System - Primary Skimmings
EA06S26 UN171 General Treatment System - Waste Activated Sludge
EA06S28 UN172 2,4-D Process Waste to Deep Well
EA06S29 UN173 Raw Phenol Wastewaters after Equalization
-------
APPENDIX C-l
1978 USEPA Sediment Survey
-------
APPENDIX C
Tittabawassee River Sediments
-------
ACCESS NO: 158-1
11
XCWP T-PUND POST-SAND FILTER 3/19-23 COMPOS PART. (REF 3
PCST-SANO: 03198*
3 333333X3233X3333333
SPECIES MONITORED
S 3333=33333=3.3333X23
1*69. TCCO
1269. TCCC
1267. TCOC
1289. TCDC
1269. TCDO
1 2*7+12*8. TCOO
1278. TCDO
1268. TCDC
1237+1238. TCOD
1279. TCDC
12*6. TCOO
1*73. TCCC
1236. TCOD
1239. TCDD
12*9. TCCC
1263. TCOC
1379. TCCD
1276. TCOC
123*. TCDO
TCTAL ISC-TCDOS
2378. TCDD
12C. 2378. TCOO RECCVE
0.0193G (FROM TSS)
£333333 = 33 333333 33333
CONCENTR
PPB ( LCD )
S3 2 = 33333333333333333
N 0.*)
N 0.*)
N 0.*)
N 0.*)
N 0.3)
2.1 0.3)
N 0.3)
0.3 ( C.3)
36. C ( _ )
N ( 0.5)
N ( 0.3)
_ )
N 0.3)
N 0.3)
N 0.2)
6*.C _ )
39. C _ )
2.9 C.3)
N 0.3)
1 * * . 3
0.* ( 0.3)
RY 82X
2*07-107-3
3333333333333X33
A T I 0 N
RELATIVE (X)
33333333 33333333
N
N
N
N
N
1.5
N
0.2
2*. 9
N
N
^
N
N
N
**.2
27.0
2.0
N
99.7
0.3
2373.TCDF
13C.2378.TCDF RECOVERY
0.7 ( 0.7)
86X
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2*679 +
23*68.
23679 +
23*69.
23*78.
23678.
23*67+
12*689
HCOO
123639
HCDD
HCDD
HCOO
123789
.HCDO
S
.HCDOS
.hCDO
S
2
1
5
•
•
•
N
^^
N
6
C
C
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
1.0)
1.0)
1.0)
)
iTo)
_ )
1.0)
30
11
58
.2
.6
.1
N
^^
N
TCTAL HCDDS
12C.123*78.HCDO RECOVERY
8.6
100.0
8 OX
1 23*679. HC70D
123*678. HC700
17. C (
15.0 {
_ ) 53.1
_ ) *6.9
32. C
100.0
89X
TCTAL H7CDDS
H7CCD CORRECTION FACTOR
OCDQ
12C.CCDO RECOVERY
3 ===== = === = = = = ========= =
N*NQT DETECTED AT LOO I.E. 2.5X PEAK TO VALLEY NOISE
( ) SIGNIFIES RESPONSE >= 25X PEAK TC VALLEY NOISE
120.0 ( _ )
96*
-------
ACCESS NO: 157-III
T-PONO POST-SAND FILTER 3/19-22 COHPOS (REF 5158)
3450.6G TCTAL WATER 2407-107-3
XCW
SPECIES MONITORED
CONCENTRATION
PPQ
( LCD ) RELATIVE (X)
1469. TCCD
1269. TCDO
1267. TCDC
1289. TCCO
1369.TCDU
1247+1248. TCDD
1278. TCCD
1268. TCDO
1237+1233. TCOO
1279. TCDO
1246. TCCD
1478. TCCD
1236. TCDO
1239. TCDD
1249. TCCD
1368. TCDC
1379. TCCC
1378. TCDD
1234. TCCO
TCTAL 1SC-TCDDS
2378. TCCD
13C. 2378. TCDO RECOVERY
2378. TCOF
13C.2378.TCDF RECOVERY
124679+124689. HCOOS
1 23468. HCOO
123679+123689. VCDDS
1 23469. HCDD
1 234 78. HCDD
123676. HCOD
123467+123789. HCDOS
TCTAL HCDOS
12C. 123478. HCDD RECOVERY
1 234679. HC7DD
1 234678. HC7DO
TCTAL H7CDDS
H7CCD CORRECTION FACTOR
OCDC
N ( 2.0)
N ( 2.0)
N ( 2.0)
N < 2.0)
N ( 2.0)
12.0 ( 2.0)
N ( 2.0)
2.C ( 2.0)
200. C ( _ )
N ( 3.0)
N ( 1.0)
( )
N < 2.0)
N ( 1.0)
N ( 1.0)
360.0 ( _ )
220.0 ( _ )
16.0 ( 2.0)
N ( 1.0)
810.0
2.0 ( 1.4)
32%
4.0 ( 4.0)
86%
15.0 7.0)
8.0 7.0)
28.0 7.0)
_ )
N 7.0)
_ )
N 7.0)
51.0
80%
96.0 ( . )
83.0 ( _ )
179. C
89%
690. C ( _ )
N
N
N
N
N
1.5
N
0.2
24.6
N
N
T
N
N
N
44.3
27.1
2.0
N
99.8
0.2
29.4
15.7
54.9
^
N
^^
N
100.0
53.6
46.4
100.0
12C.CCOO RECOVERY
N=NOT DETECTED AT LDD I.E. 2.5X PEAK TO VALLEY NOISE
nrcnr-*icc V— "> K Y
TT V«I(PY NHTSF
-------
ECWP T-PCNO OUTLET
T-DISCHARGE: 031984
x ss«rz3sssss»sas*=*
SPECIES MONITORED
ACCESS NC: 156-111
3/19-23 CQMPCS PART. (REF 5155)
0.0373G (FROh TSS) 2*07-107-2
: r s s s x x :
CONCENTRATION
PPB
( LCD ) RELATIVE (X)
= 3 = = s = ss
1 469. TCCO
1 269.TCDC
1267. TCDD
1289. TCCD
1369. TCCD
1247+1243. TCOO
1 278. TCCC
1268. TCCD
1237+1238. TCDO
1279.TCCL
1246. TCDD
1 473. TCCC
1236. TCDO
1239. TCCD
1249. TCCD
1368. TCDO
1379. TCCC
1378. TCDD
1234. TCOD
TCTAL 1SC-TCODS
2378. TCCC
N
N
N
N
0.6
5.7
0.5
0.6
110.0
N
0.2
N
N
0.3
190.0
110. C
7.2
0.2
425.3
1.2
0.2)
0.2)
0.2)
0.2)
C.4)
. )
0.4)
C.4)
_ )
0.8)
0.1)
_ )
0.6)
0.1
C.I
= 25X PEAK TC VALLEY NCISE
-------
ECW T-POND OUTLET
T-OI5CHARGE: 03198*
ACCESS NC: 155-111
3/19-23 COMPCS (REF 5156)
3457.9G TOTAL WATER 2407-107-2
SPECIES MONITORED
- szszsz ssrzajsazsrsaz ss as
1*69. TCCC
1269. TCDC
1267. TCCO
1289. TCOO
1269. TCOC
12*7+1248. TCDO
1278. TCCC
1268. TCCO
1237+1238. TCOD
1279. TCDO
12*6. TCCO
1*78. TCCO
1236. TCOC
1239. TCCD
12*9. TCCO
1 363. TCCO
1379. TCCD
1378. TCCD
123*. TCDO
TCTAL ISC-TCDDS
2378. TCOO
13C. 2378. TCOO RECOVERY
C 0 N C £
PPQ 1
3SSSZ2 2553
N
N
N
N
6.C
62.0
5 .0
6 .0
1200.0
N
2.0
N
N
3.0
2COO.C
1200.C
78 .0
2.C
4564. C
13.0
1
: N T R
LCD )
: s s, ss x *
2.0)
2.0)
2.0)
2.0)
4.0)
_ )
4.0)
4.0)
_ )
9.0)
1.0)
_ )
[ 7.0)
[ 1.0)
I 1.0)
t - )
[ _ )
[ _ )
( 1.0)
( _ )
55%
A T I 0 N
RELATIVE (X)
XSX333X3X3232S 3 3 S
N
N
N
N
0.1
1.4
0.1
0.1
26.2
N
0.0
N
N
0.1
43.7
26.2
1.7
0.0
99.7
0.3
2378.TCOF
13C.2378.TCOF RECCVERY
16.C ( 5.0)
72*
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2*679 +
23468.
23679 +
23*69.
23478.
23678.
23467+
124689
HCOD
123689
HCOO
HCOO
HCOO
123789
.HCOOS
.HCCC
s
.HCDOS
87
52
150
35
19
.C (
.0 (
.C (
_ (
7o (
<
7o (
77
_
77
_
77
0
0
25
15
43
10
)
0) 5
•
•
•
_
•
•
4
2
7
2
5
TCTAL HCDDS
13C. 123473. HCDO RECOVERY
343.0
100.0
9CX
123*679. HC7DD
1 23*673. HC7DD
770.C (
690.0 (
_ ) 52.7
_ ) 47.3
TCT4L H7CODS
H7CCO CC*RECTICN FACTOR
1460. C 100.0
ABSOLUTE
OCDO
13C.OCOO RECOVERY
N=NQT DETECTED AT LOO I.E
t_) SIGMFIES RESPONSE > =
7800. C ( _ )
ABSOLUTE
, 2.5X PEAK TD VALLEY NOISE
25X PEAK TC VALLEY NCISE
-------
ACCESS NO: 150-111
XCWP T-PONO PCST-SANO FILTER 3/12-16 CQPPCS PART. (REF
POST-SAND: 031284 0.01790 (FROM TSS) 2407-91-3
S232Z23S3232»Z3ZZ333:ZZSS.333=Z3ZZ32Z3zazSZ383233ZS;z:ZZZZ3
SPECIES MONITORED CONCENTRAT ION
PPB ( LCD ) RELATIVE (X)
23333322323S222222S2222233333335S2232223
1 *69. TCCD
1269. TCOD
1267. TCCD
1289. TCDO
1369. TCOO
1247+1248. TCDD
1278. TCDO
1269. TCOD
1237+1238. TCOO
1279. TCDO
1246. TCOO
1478. TCCC
1236. TCOD
1239. TCOO
1249. TCDC
1368. TCDO
1379. TCOD
1378. TCDD
1234. TCDO
TCTAL ISC-TCDDS
2375. TCCD
13C.237S.TCDO RECOVERY
2373. TCDF
12C.2378.TCDF RECOVERY
124679+124689. HCDOS
123468. HCOO
1 23679+123689. HCCDS
123469. HCOD
123478. HCOD
1 23679. HCDD
123467+123739. HCCDS
TCTAL HCDDS
13C. 123478. HCDC RECOVERY
1234679. HC700
1 23467S.HC70D
TCTAL H7CDOS
H7CCD CORRECTION FACTOR
N
N
N
N
N
5.6
0.6
1.0
110.0
N
0.2
N
N
N
210. C
140.0
7.7
N
475.1
0.7
1.2
5.0
4.C
3.0
273
27o
21.3
23.0
21. C
44. C
( 0.3)
( 0.3)
( 0.3)
( 0.3)
( 0.4)
( _ )
( 0.4)
( 0.4)
{ _ )
( C.4)
( C.2)
( __ )
( C?7)
( 0.2)
( 0.2)
( _ )
( _ )
( _ )
( 074)
( 0.2)
77%
( C.7)
73^
2.0)
2.0)
2.0)
)
27o)
_ )
27o)
85X
( _ )
( _ )
9CX
N
N
N
N
N
1.2
0.1
0.2
23.1
N
0.0
N
N
N
44.1
29.4
1.6
N
99.9
0.1
23.5
18.8
37.6
io7a
974
100.0
52.3
47.7
100.0
OCDD 150.0 ( _ )
1 3C.DCDO RECOVERY 96%
N=NOT DETECTED AT LOD I.E. 2.5X PEAK TO VALLEY NOISE
(_) SIGNIFIES RESPCNSE >* 25X PEAK TC VALLEY NCISE
-------
ACCESS NO: 149-111
XCW T-PONO POST-SAND FILTER 3/12-16 COPOS (REF 5150)
PCST-SAKO: 031284 3433.2G TCTAL WATER 2407-91-3
= ======. = ==X=== = ===X= ===== = = = = = = = ====X=X3S=XS=3=ZX = = = = = =
SPECIES MONITORED CONCENTRATION
PPQ ( LCD ) RELATIVE U)
1469.TCCC N ( 2.0) N
1269.TCDO N ( 2.0) N
1267.TCCD N ( 2.0) N
1289.TCCC N ( 2.0) N
1369.TCDO N < 2.0) N
1247+1248.TCOD 29.0 < . ) 1.2
1273.TCDO 3.C ( 2.0) 0.1
1268.TCCC 5.C ( 2.0) 0.2
1237 + 1236.TCOO 550.0 ( _ ) 22.4
1279.TCOD N ( 2.0) N
1246.TCCC 1.0 ( 1.0) 0.0
1478.TCCC . ( > )
1236.TCOC N ( 4.0) N
1239.TCCC N ( 1.0) N
1249.TCCC N ( 1.0) N
1368.TCDO 1100.C ( _ ) 44.9
1379.TCCC 720.C ( . ) 29.4
1373.TCCC 40.C ( . ) 1.6
1234.TCOC N ( 2.0) N
TCTAL ISC-TCODS 2443.C 99.9
237C.TCDO 3.4 ( 1.0) 0.1
13C.2378.TCOD RECOVERY 77*
2378.TCCF 6.C ( 4.0)
13C.2378.FCOF RECOVERY 73%
124679+124689.HCODS 26.C ( 9.0) 23.6
123468.HCOO 21.C ( 9.0) 19.1
123679+123689.HCODS 42.C ( 9.0) 38.2
1 23469. HCOO _ ( _ )
123478.HCDO 12.0 ( 8.0) 10.9
123678.HCOD _ ( _ )
123467+123739.HCOOS 9.C ( 8.0) 8.2
TCTAL HCDOS 110.0 100.0
13C.123473.HCDC RECOVERY 85%
1234679.HC700 120.0 ( _ ) 52.2
1234678.HC700 110.C ( _ ) 47.8
TCTAL H7CDOS 230.0 100.0
H7COD CORRECTICN FACTOR 90%
OCDO 800.C ( _ )
13C.OCOO RECOVERY 96%
N=NCT DETECTED AT LOO I.E. 2.5X PEAK TO VALLEY NOISE
i > CT/-MTCTCC pcsppNSF >= ?5X PFAK TC VALLEY NOISE
-------
ECWP T-PQND OUTLET
T-DISCHARGE: 03128*
s====s===r==s===zr=
SPECIES MONITORED
ACCESS NO: 1*8-111
3/12-16 COMPCS PART. {REF 51*7)
0.1026G (FROf TSS) 2*07-91-2
: s 2 s 3 = =:
CONCENTRATION
PPB ( LCD ) RELATIVE (X)
1*69. TCCO
1269. TCCC
1267. TCCO
1289. TCOD
1369. TCDO
12*7+12*8. TCDO
1278. TCCD
1 268. TCDO
1237+1238. TCDD
1279. TCCC
12*6. TCDD
1*78. TCCO
1236. TCDC
1239. TCOO
1 2*9. TCDD
1368. TCDD
1379 .TCDC
1378. TCCD
123* .TCCC
TCTAL ISC-TCDDS
2378. TCDD
N
O.E
N
N
0.9
19. C
1 .C
2.0
370.0
N
0.2
N
0.5
0.3
780. C
*70.0
26. C
0.2
1670.9
2.0
0.5)
0.5)
0.5)
0.5)
0.3)
_ )
C.5)
C.5)
_ )
C.8)
0.0)
_ )
1.9)
_ )
C.O)
_ )
_ )
_ )
0.0)
( - )
N
0.0
N
N
0.1
1.1
0.1
0.1
22.1
N
0.0
•—
N
0.0
0.0
*6.6
28.1
1.6
0.0
99.9
0.1
13C.2378.rCOD RECOVERY
8C*
2378.TCDF
13C.2378.TCOF RECOVERY
3.1 ( _ )
76X
12*679+12*689. HCDDS
123*68. HCDO
1 23679+123689 .HCDDS
1 23*69. HCDO
1 23* 78. HCDO
123678. HCOO
123*67+123789. HCDCS
15. C
18.0
3*.C
_
loTo
_
3?9
_ 1
_
—
^^
0.5
18.5
22.2
*2.0
—
12.*
^
*.8
TCT4L HCCOS
13C.123*78.HCDO RECOVERY
80.9
100.0
95%
1 23*679. HC70D
1 23*678. HC700
110.0 (
120.0 {
_ ) *7.8
_ ) 52.2
TCTAL H7COOS
H7CDD CORRECT ICN FACTOR
230.0 100.0
AESCLUTE
OCDO
13C.CCDC RECOVERY
1600.0 ( _ )
ABSOLUTE
N=NCT DETECTED AT LOD I.E. 2.5X PEAK TO VALLEY NOISE
( ) DIGNIFIES RESPONSE >= 25X PEAK TC VALLEY NOISE
-------
ECW T-PCNO
T-OISCHARGE:
CUTLET
031284
ACCESS NO: 147-III
3/12-16 C3MPCS (REF 3148)
2663.7G TCTAL WATER 2407-91-2
SPECIES MONITORED
3 ==3333==33SS3SSS = =33=S =
1169. TCCC
1269. TCDO
1267. TCOO
1 289. TCCC
1 369.TCCO
1247 + 1248. TCDO
1278. TCCD
126«J. TCCC
1237 + 1238. TCDO
1279. TCDC
1246. TCDC
1 47?. TCCD
1236. TCCD
1239. TCCD
1249. TCCC
1 368. TCCC
1379. TCCO
1378. TCDD
1 234. TCCC
TCTAL ISC-TCDDS
2378. TCDO
13C.2378.TCOD RECOVERY
C C N C E
PPQ <
= = S = SS 3 = 33
N <
3.0 (
N <
N
35.0
750.0
40. C
80.0
14000. C
N
8.C
N
21 .0
12.0
30000. C
18000. C
1000.C
9.C
63958. C
76. C
f
N T R
LCD )
I 33 33 S3
2.0)
2.0)
2.0)
2.0)
10.0)
_ )
20?0)
20.0)
_ )
3o7o)
2.0)
)
75?0)
_ )
27o
_ )
)
_ )
27o
t _ )
>0%
A T I 0 N
RELATIVE (5,')
33S3333XSS33XS3S3
N
0.0
N
N
0.1
1.2
0.1
0.1
21.9
N
0.0
_
N
0.0
0.0
46.9
28.1
1.6
0.0
99.9
0.1
2378.TCOF
13C.2378.TCOF RECOVERY
120.0 (
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
24679 +
23468.
23679 +
23469.
23473.
23678.
23467+
124689
HCDD
123689
HCDD
HCDD
HCOD
123789
.HCDOS
.HCCCS
.HCODS
580
700
1300
390
150
• C (
.0 (
.0 (
( _
• C (
*
To ( 2c7o
18
22
41
12
4
.6
.4
.7
_
.5
^
.8
TCTiL HCCOS 3120.C
13C.123473.HCOD RECOVERY 95X
100.0
1234679.HC700
1 234678.HC700
4100.0
4800.C
46.1
53.9
TCTAL H7C9DS
H7CCC CORRECTION FACTOR
8900.C 100.0
ABSOLUTE
OCDO
13C.CCOC RECOVERY
60000.C ( _ )
ABSOLUTE
N=NCT DETECTED AT LOO I.E. 2.5X PEAK TO VALLEY NOISE
(.) SIGNIFIES RESPONSE >= 25X PEAK TC VALLEY NOISE
-------
ACCESS NC:
XCWP T-PONO POST-SAND FILTER 3/5-9
PCST-SANC: 03058* 0.031CG (FROM
1*2-111
COMPCS
TSS)
PART. (REF
2*07-76-3
1*1)
SPECIES MONITORED
CO
PPB
N C
N T
LOO
T I 0 N
RELATIVE
(X)
sazrs - ---:
1*69. TCCC
1269. TCOO
1267. TCOC
1289.TCDC
1369. TCCC
12*7 + 12*8. TCDO
1273. TCCC
1268. TCCO
1 237 + 1238. TCDO
1279. TCCC
1 2*6. TCCO
1*73. TCOO
1236. TCCD
1239. TCCO
12*9. TCCO
1368. TCOC
1379. TCCO
1378. TCCD
123*. TCCD
TCTAL ISO-TCOOS
2373. TCDO
N
N
N
N
N
*.9
0.*
0.*
69.0
N
N
_
N
N
N
120. C
86. C
5.C
N
285.7
0.6
0.3)
0.3)
C.3)
0.3)
C.3)
_ )
0.3)
0.3)
_ )
0.3)
0.3)
. )
0.5)
0.3)
0.3)
_ )
_ )
_ )
0.3)
( C.2)
N
N
N
N
N
1.7
0.1
0.1
2*.l
N
N
N
N
N
*1.9
30.0
1.7
N
99.8
0.2
13C.2378.TCOO RECOVERY
79%
2373. TCDF
13C.2376.TCDF RECOVERY
12*679+12*689. HCODS
1 23*68. HCDO
123679+123689. HCDDS
123*69. HCOD
1 23*78. HCDO
123678. HCOO
123*67+123789. HCDOS
TCTAL HCDOS
13C. 123*78. HCOD RECOVERY
123*679. HC 700
1 23*678. HC70D
TLTAL H7CODS
H7C3D CORRECTION FACTOR
0.9
*.C
*.C
8.2
2.0
1.0
19.2
17. C
17.0
3*.0
( 0.7)
86X
( 1.0)
( 1.0)
( 1.0)
( _ )
( 1.0)
( _ )
( 1.0)
81X
( _ )
( _ )
82%
20.8
20.8
*2.7
10.*
5.2
100.0
50.0
50.0
100.0
OCDO
13C .OCDD RECOVERY
1*0.0 ( _ )
83%
N=NC7 DETECTED AT LOO I.E. 2.5X PEAK TO VALLEY NOISE
{_) SIGNIFIES RESPONSE >= 25X PEAK TC VALLEY NOISE
-------
ACCESS NC: 1*1-111
XCW T-PUND PCST-SANO FILTER 3/5-S CQMPCS (REF 51*2)
PLST-SANC: 03058* 3373.3G TCTAL WATER 2*07-76-3
ssxsr s;
SPECIES MONITORED
1*69. TCCO
1269. TCOC
1267. TCCO
1289. TCCC
1269. TCCO
1 2*7 + 12*8. TCDD
1278. TCOC
1268. TCDD
1237+1238. TCDO
1279. TCDD
12*6. TCOC
1*78. TCCC
1236. TCOO
1239. TCDD
12*9. TCCD
1368. TCCC
1379. TCDC
1378. TCDC
123*. TCDO
TCTAL ISC-TCOOS
237S.TCDC
13C. 2378. TCDO RECOVERY
2278. TCDF
13C.2378.TCOF RECOVERY
12*679+12*689. HCDCS
123*68. HCOO
123679+123639. HCDDS
123*69. HCDD
123* 78. HCOO
1 23673.HCOD
123*67+123789. HCDDS
TLTAL HCCOS
13C .123*78. HCDO RECOVERY
123*679. HC700
1 23*678. HC700
TCT4L H7CDOS
H7CCD CORRECTION FACTOR
C G N C
PPQ
N
N
N
N
N
*5.C
* .0
*.o
630.0
N
N
N
N
N
1100. C
790. C
*6.C
N
2619. C
5.C
a.o
*o.o
*o.c
75.0
is7c
_
10. C
180. C
160. C
160.0
320.0
E N T R
( LCD )
( 3.C)
( 3.0)
( 3.0)
( 3.0)
( 3.0)
( )
( 3.0)
( 3.0)
( _ )
( 270)
( 3.0)
( )
( s7o)
( 3.0)
( 3.0)
( _ )
( __ )
( _ )
( 370)
( 2.0)
79X
( 6.0)
86%
( 10.0)
( 10.0)
( 10.0)
( _ )
( ic7o)
( _ )
( 10.0)
six
( _ )
( _ )
82*
4 T I 0 N
RELATIVE (X)
tsxxsss^sssxsssss s s
N
N
N
N
N
1.7
0.2
0.2
2*.0
N
N
N
N
N
41.9
30.1
1.8
N
99.8
0.2
22.2
22.2
*1.7
873
576
100.0
50.0
50.0
100.0
IKDO
13C.DCOC RECOVERY
1300.C ( _ )
82*
N=N2T DETECTED AT LOO I.E. 2.5X PEAK TO VALLEY NOISE
i \ CTKNTFTFS RFSPHNSE >= 25X PEAK TC VALLEY NCISE
-------
ECWP T-PONO
T-OISCHARGE:
OUTLET
03058*
ACCESS NC: 1*0-111
3/5-9 COMPCS PARTICIPATES
0.0641G (FROP TSS) 2*07-76-2
(REF S
13S)
SPECIES MONITORED
CGNCtNTRAT ION
PP8 ( LCD ) RELATIVE (X)
:=2===s=a=r===rs==2==23222==a==
1 *69.TCCC
1269. TCCC
1267. TCCD
1289. TCCD
1 369. TCDC
1 2*7+12*8. TCOD
1273. TCCC
1268. TCOO
1 237 + 1238. TCOD
1279. TCDD
12*6. TCDD
1*73. TCCC
1236. TCCC
1239. TCDC
1 2*9. TCDC
1368. TCDO
1 379.TCUC
1373. TCCC
123*. TCDC
TCTAL ISO-TCDDS
2378. TCCC
13C. 2378. TCOD RECOVERY
237S.TCDF
1 2C.2378.TCDF RECOVERY
12*679+12*639. HCCOS
123*69. HCDD
123679+123639. HCCDS
1 23*69. HCDD
123*78. HCOD
123673. HCDD
123*67+123739. HCCDS
TCTAL HCDOS
13C. 123*78. HCDC RECOVERY
123*679. HC70D
123*678. HC700
TLT1L H7CDOS
H7COC CIKRECTICN FACTOR
OCDC
13C.CCDD RECOVERY
N
N
N
N
0.*
11 .C
1.2
1.3
170.0
N
N
N
0.2
0.2
220. C
1*0. C
9.*
0.1
553.8
0.9
1 .5
8.3
9.*
16. C
57o
27c
*0.7
53.0
53. C
106.0
510. C
0.2)
0.2)
0.2)
0.2)
0.*)
o7*)
C.*)
o7*)
0.2)
i7o)
0.2)
( 0.2)
< _ )
( _ )
( i7o)
( 0.1)
( 0.1)
7CX
{ C.3)
72*
( 1.0)
( 1.0)
( _ )
( _ )
( i7o)
( _ )
( i7o)
82*
( _ )
( _ )
9CX
( _ ,
99^5
N
N
N
N
0.1
2.0
0.2
0.2
30.6
N
N
N
0.0
0.0
39.7
25.2
1.7
0.0
99.8
0.2
20.*
23.1
39.3
1273
A 79
100.0
50.0
50.0
100.0
N=NCT DETECTED AT LCD I.E. 2.5X PEAK TO VALLEY NOISE
( ) SIGNIFIES RESPONSE >= 25X PEAK TC VALLEY NCISE
-------
ECU T-PONO
T-OISCHARGE:
ACCESS NC: 139-111
OUTLET 3/5-9 COMPCS (REF 5140)
030584 3409.7G TOTAL WATER 2407-76-2
SPECIES KCNI fORED
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
T
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
T
1
1
469.TCCC
269. TCOO
267. TCDO
289. TCCO
369.TCCD
247+1243. TCOO
273. TCOO
268. TCCO
237 + 1238. TCOO
279.TCDD
246.TCCC
478.TCDD
236. TCDO
239. TCDO
249.TCOC
368. TCDO
379.TCDD
375.TCDQ
234.TCDD
CTAL 1SO-TCOOS
378.TCCD
3C. 2378. TCOD RECCVERY
378.TCOF
3C.2376.TCOF RECOVERY
24679+124689. HCCOS
23468. HCOO
23679+123639. ^CODS
23469. HCOD
23478. HCOD
23678. HCOD
23467+123789. HCODS
CTAL HCCOS
3C. 123478. HCDO RECOVERY
234679. HC700
1234678. HC700
TCTAL H7CDDS
S 3 = 3 3
CON
PRO
3 S 3 3 S
9
200
22
23
3100
4
4
4 COO
2600
170
3
1013*
17
27
s
s
N
N
N
N
•
•
«
•
•
N
N
N
•
•
*
•
•
•
•
•
*
C
S =
0
C
0
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
0
E
(
S 3
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
7C
{
= =3,
N T
LOO
3 SS
3.
3.
3.
3.
7.
77
7.
77
3.
207
3.
3.
_
2c7
2.
2.
*
5.
333
R
9
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
)
s s
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
A T
=
3S:r==:SSSS*SS
I 0 N
RELATIVE (X)
3 S 3
s
S33SS3S3S3S3
N
N
N
N
0
2
C
0
30
•
*
•
•
•
1
0
2
2
5
N
N
N
0
0
39
25
1
0
99
0
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
0
0
4
6
7
0
8
2
72*
150
170
230
90
40
730
•
*
•
•
•
•
C
0
0
C
0
C
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
2C.
2C.
2C7
••
2C.
0)
0
0
0
)
)
)
)
)
)
20
23
38
12
5
100
•
•
•
.
•
•
5
3
4
3
5
0
82X
960
960
1920
•
•
•
C
0
C
H7C3D CORRECTION FACTOR
(
<
)
>
50
50
100
•
•
•
0
0
0
9C2
ocoo
13C.CJCUD RECOVERY
9100.C (
995:
N=NCT DETECTED AT LOO I.E. 2.5X PEAK TO VALLEY NOISE
< > DIGNIFIES RESPCNSE >= 25X PEAK TC VALLEY NOISE
-------
EEW T-POND OUTLET
WATER:051383-5
SPECIES MONITORED
ACCESS MC: 81-111
UNSETTLED HATER (REF 582)
1919.3G 2060-59-1
==========
rsxsxszcsssxsx
CCNCENTRAT10N
PPQ
( LCD ) RELATIVE (X)
: = 2 = = = s :
1469.TCOC
1269. TCOO
1267. TCCO
1289. TCDO
1369. TCDD
1247 + 124d.TCOO
1278. TCCO
1268. TCCC
1237+1238. TCDD
1279. TCCO
1246. TCDC
1 473. TCDO
1236. TCCO
1239. TCDO
1249. TCCC
1368. TCOD
1379. TCQC
1378. TfCD
1234. TCOO
TCTAL ISC-TCDDS
2378. TCCD
13C. 2378. TCDD RECOVERY
2373. TCOF
13C.2378.TCDF RECOVERY
1 24679+124689. HCDOS
123468. HCOO
123679+123689. HCCDS
123469. HCOO
123478. HCDO
1236 78. HCDO
123467+123789. HCDDS
N
N
N
N
4.C
22. C
N
3.C
94.0
N
3.C
N
N
N
2.C
345. C
97.0
11.0
N
581 .C
11 .C
_
^^
_
_mi
_
-
3.0)
3.0)
3.0)
3.0)
2.0)
)
?7o)
2.0)
( _ )
( 270)
( 2.0)
2.0)
2.0)
2.0)
2.0)
_ )
_ )
370)
3.0)
( 2.0)
87%
( _ )
-
( _ )
( _ )
_ )
)
_ )
_ )
- }
N
N
N
N
0.7
3.7
N
0.5
15.9
N
0.5
N
N
N
0.3
58.3
16.4
1.9
N
98.1
1.9
— ^
_
^^
_
TCTAL HCCOS
13C.123479.HCDO
RECOVERY
1234679.HC700
1234678.HC7DD
TCTAL H7CDDS
H7CDO CCSRECTICN FACTOR
OCDD
13C.GCOO
RECOVERY
==================== ======================S3I===XZ=z:
N=NCT DETECTED AT LOO I.E. 2.5X PEAK TC VALLEY NOISE
(_) SIGNIFIES RESPONSE >= 25X PEAK TC VALLEY NOISE
-------
ECU
ACCESS NO: 104-111
T-PQNO OUTLET UNFILTER5D KATER
WATER: C4C433-2W
975G
2C74-65-2H
zssssrssa
C3ZSSX.SSSS3S
i s s a s x
SPECIES MONITORED
CONCENTRATION
PPQ < LCD ) RELATIVE U)
1 469. TCOO
1269. TCOC
1267. TCOO
1289. TCDD
1 369. TCDO
1247+1248. TCOO
1278. TCDO
1263. TCOO
1 237+1238. TCOO
1279. TCDD
1246. TCDO
1478. TCDD
1236. TCOO
1239. TCDO
1249. TCDD
1 368. TCOO
1379. TCOO
1373. TCOO
1234. TCDO
TCTAL ISC-TCOOS
2378. TCDO
13C.2378.TCOD RECOVERY
2378. TCCF
13C.2378.TCDF RECOVERY
124679 + 124689. HCDOS
123468. HCOO
123679+123689. KOOS
1 23469. HCDD
123 4 73. HCOO
1236 78. HCOO
123467+123739. HCDDS
N
N
N
N
11.0
67.0
12. C
11 .0
360.0
9.0
N
7.0
7.C
N
8.C
750. C
270. C
34. C
5.0
1551 .0
40.0
(
-
6.0)
6.0)
6.0)
6.0)
6.0)
)
6?0)
6.0)
_ )
67o)
5.0)
5.0)
5.0)
5.0)
5.0)
_ )
)
570)
5.0)
f - )
J5*
( _ )
( _ )
_ )
)
)
_ )
_ )
- }
N
N
N
N
0.7
4.2
0.8
0.7
22.6
0.6
N
0.4
0.4
N
0.5
47.1
17.0
2.1
0.3
97.5
2.5
-
TCTAL HCDOS
13C. 123478.HCDD RECOVERY
1234679.HC700
1 234678.HC7DO
TCTAL H7CODS
H7CCD CCRRECTICN FACTOR
OCDD
13C.CCOD RECOVERY
N=NCT DETECTED AT LCD I.E. 2.5X PEAK TC VALLEY NOISE
( ) SIGNIFIES RESPCNSE >= 25X PEAK TC V4LLEY NCISE
-------
DOW CHEMICAL
2,3,7,8,TETRACHLORODIBENZO-P-DIOXIN
MOR SUBMITTALS TO MDNR
MONTH
JULY 1984
AUGUST
SEPTEMBER
OCTOBER
NOVEMBER
DECEMBER
JANUARY 1985
FEBRUARY
MARCH
APRIL
MAY
JUNE
JULY
AUGUST
SEPTEMBER
OCTOBER
NOVEMBER
DECEMBER
JANUARY 1986
February
March
MONTHLY AVE
PPQ
10.5
4.5
3.4
6.2
12.5
12.5
19
13
28
19
3
17
32
17
5
9
2
4
to
11(6/21),
5.9(7/23)
3.7(8/21)
3.5(9/24)
8.9(10/22
9(12/8),
24(12/21)
17(1/23),
12(2/21)
24(3/25),
3(4/21) 3
17(5/21),
33(6/24),
12(7/23),
5(8/21),
9(9/23),
2(10/21),
2(11/21),
5(ifc/*&)
8(1/21)
4(2/23)
10(7/1)
, 3.1(8/6)
, 3.0(9/3)
, 8.8(10/6)
), 16(11/5)
16(12/20)
, 14(1/2)
8(2/4)
44(3/5)
13(4/2)
(5/8)
16(6/3)
31(7/10)
22(8/5)
4(9/4)
8(10/3)
2(11/6)
5(12/4)
8(2/3)
3(3/3)
-------
APPENDIX B-7
PCDDs and PCDFs
Dow Chemical Data
-------
Mscharger:
Sample Date;
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION Y
EASTERN DISTRICT OFFICE
Dow Chemical Intakes/Outfall 031/Pilot Plant
Sample Type: 8 C-8 hour flow proportioned composite
24C-24 hour flow proportioned composite
EYC-Equal volume composite
G-Grab
Sample Type
Time
Sample Number 84ER06
Date
Parameter
DIOXINS AND FURANS
2378-TCbD
Total Tetra CODS
TbTal Penta CDDS
Total Hexa CDDS
Tolai Hepta CUDS
OCDD
2378-TCDF
Total Tetra CDFs
Total Penta CDFs
Total Hexa CDFS
Total Hepta CDFs
OCDF
Ti tta .
River
Intake
Com p.
1214-
0940
505
8/28-
29/84
P9/9
(ppt)
ND/.022
ND/.012
ND/.120
ND/.046
ND/.087
0.188
ND/.022
0.043
ND/.051
ND/.036
ND/.054
ND/.175
Lake
Huron
Intake
Comp.
1220-
0905
S10
8/28-
29/84
pg/g
(ppt)
ND/.045
ND/.015
ND/.150
ND/.057
ND/458
0.305
ND/.OZ9
ND/.013
ND/.057
ND/.043
ND/.104
ND/.126j
Outfal 1
031
Comp.
1206-
0853
S15
8/28-
29/84
pg/g
(ppt)
NO/. 050
ND/.035
ND/.126
ND/.082
NO/. 191
ND/.333
nn / nc£
ML)/ .USD
3.94
ND/.046
ND/.079
ND/.084
ND/.209
85ER03
Pilot
Plant
Influent
G
0825
S24
12/4/84
P9/1
(ppq)
NO/ 9d
2000
350
180
1400
5400
wn/ QU
12000
1700
1500
7400
6600
Pilot
Plant
Effluent
G
0857
S25
12/4/84
P9/1
(ppq)
NQ/ 8d
69
NO/17
180b
280&
790&
wn/ 7
1500
ND/33
NO/ 15
86
440°
b = Possible carryover from previous injection of standard.
d = Data for 2378-TCDD and 2378-TCDF was generated 3/1/85 using an Gometer SP 2330 column.
-------
scharger:
nple Date: 7/25-27/84
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION Y
EASTERN DISTRICT OFFICE
Tittabawassee River Flood Plain Analyses
Sample Type:
8 C-8 hour flow proportioned composite
24C-24 hour flow proportioned composite
EVC-Equal volume composite
G-Grab
Station #
FP-1
FP-2
FP-3
Sample Type
Time
Sample Number 84ER04
Date
Parameter
V. DIOXINS AND FURANS
2378-TCDD
Total Tetra CDDs
Total Penta CDDs
Total Hexa CDDs
Total Hej)ta CDDs
OCDD
Z378-TCDF
Total Tetra CDFs
Total Penta CDFs
Total Hexa CDFs
total Hepta COFs
OCDF '
At Dow
Tertiary
Pond
G
1550
S04
7/26/84
ng/g
(ppb)
ND/.01
0.11
0.09
0.14
2.1
16
0.02
1.0
0.10
0.15
0.65
1.3
At Waite
& Debolt
Drain
G
1940
S06
7/25/84
ng/g
(ppb)
ND/.01
0.13
ND/.01
ND/.01
0.53
3.9
0.11
1.5
0.09
0.04
0.65
1.5
At
Ti tta .
Road
G
0915
510
7/27/84
ng/g
(ppb)
ND/.03
0.36
0.12
0.20
1.3
7.8
2.18
7.6
4.1
1.7
1.9
2.3
-------
NOTES:
1. ND = Compound was analyzed for but not detected. Value reported is the detection limit.
2. * = Presence of compound may be due to sample bottle preparation, field and/or labora-
tory contamination. Methylene chloride is used as a cleaning agent for sample
bottles. Phthalate compounds are components of certain plastics and are widespread
in the environment at low levels.
3. ** = Data reported on wet weight basis.
4. J = Estimated value, detected below minimum specified contract detection limit but
greater than zero.
5. C = Blank corrected.
6. ug/kg = microgram per kilogram.
7. mg/kg = milligram per kilogram.
8. ppb = parts per billion.
9. ppm = parts per million.
10. ng/g = nanogram per gram.
-------
Tittabawassee River Sediment Analyses
Tentatively Identified Compounds
Station Number:
Sample Type:
Time:
Sample Number: 84ER04
Date:
CAS
Number Parameter
1604-34-8 2-undecanone, 6,10-dimethyl
638-66-4 Octadecanal
1120-25-8 9-hexadecenoic acid, methylester, (z)-
5129-60-2 Pentadecanoic acid, 4-methyl-,
methylester-
2091-29-4 9-hexadecenoic acid
57-10-3 Hexadecanoic acid
5353-25-3 Etnanol, 2-(9-octadecenyloxy)-, (z)-
26489-01-0 6-octen-l-ol, 3,7-dimethyl-, ( )-
1454-85-9 1-heptadecanol
630-06-8 Hexatriacontane
TK-1
Above
Ash
Pond
G
1610
SOI
7/25/84
ug/g
(PP"0
0.78 UK
0.91 01
1.5 UK
0.92 01
1.1 01
6.2 01
0.77 UK
1.0 UK
4.5 01
6.5 UK
1.1 UK
11.0 UK
2.7 01
2.0 Uk
2.3 UK
12.0 01
4.6 Ot
TR-2
Below
Ash
Pond
6
1700
S02
7/25/84
ug/g
(ppm)
1.6 UK
TR-3
Above
Lingle
Drain
G
1900
S03
7/25/84
ug/g
(Ppm)
1.2 UK
1.2 UK
1.7 UK
TR-4
Smith's
Crossing
G
2010
S05
7/25/84
ug/g
(ppm)
0.54 UK
TR-5
Upstream
of Brown
Mills
G
2050
S07
7/25/84
ug/g
(ppmj
TR-6
At
Freeland
Road
G
0840
S08
7/27/84
ug/g
(PP"0
TR-7
At
Titta.
Road
G
0920
S09
7/27/84
ug/g
(PPi")
1.2 RS
1. 1 UK
TR-8
At
Gratiot
Road
G
0945
S12
7/27/84
ug/g
(ppm)
TR-9
At
Center
Road
G
0850
S13
7/27/84
ug/g
(ppm)
3 .0 UK
0.73 01
6.0 01
1.7 UK
NOTES: 01 - Isomer or similar compound.
UK - Unknown, not in N8S library.
RS - Reasonable detection, retention time compatibility.
-------
CAS
Number
Station Number:
Sample Number:
Parameter
84ER04
3790-71-4 2,6,l()-dO(lecrttrten-l-ol,
3,7,11-trimethyl-, (Z,E)-
629-73-2 1-hexadecene
54833-48-6 Heptadecane, 2.6.10.15-tetramethyl-
56554-96-2 2-octadecenal
55320-02-0 9,12,15-octaiiecatrlenoic acid,
2,3-bis(acetyloxy) propyl
56599-50-9 2H-pyran, 2-(7-heptadecynyloxy)
tetrahydro-
1002-84-Z Pentadecanolc acid
131-18-0 1,2-benzene dicarboxylic acid,
dlpentylester
55162-61-3 Tetracontane. 3,5,24-trimethyl-
56771-77-8 4-hexanoic acid, 3-methyl-2.6-d1oxo-
56554-88-2 5-octadecenal
14676-29-0 Heptane, 3-ethyl-2-methyl-
629-99-2 Pentacosane
629-74-3 1-hexadecyne
10544-50-0 Sulfur. Mol (58)
544-63-8 Tetradecanotc acid
29812-79-1 Hydroxylamine, o-decyl
Tittabawassee River Sediment Analyses
Tentatively Identified Compounds
(continued)
TK-1
Above
Ash
Pond
SOI
ug/g
(PP"i)
4.0 UK
1.0 UK
1.8 UK
3.4 UK
1.7 UK
5.6 UK
4.0 UK
1.2 UK
6.7? UK
2.0 uk
0.9 Uk
0.76 UK
1.7 UK
3.9 UK
2.7 UK
1.7 01
1.8 UK
0.62 UK
1.5 UK
TR-2
Below
Ash
Pond
so 2
ug/g
(PP"0
1.5 UK
TR-3
Above
Llngle
Drain
S03
ug/g
(ppm)
1.2 UK
0.85 RS
0.65 UK
1.0 UK
TR-4
Smith's
Crossing
SOS
ug/g
(Pfm)
0.54 UK
TK-5
Upstream
of Brown
Mills
SO 7
ug/g
(ppm)
TR-6
At
Freeland
Road
SOS
ug/g
(PP"i)
TR-7
At
Tltta.
Road
S09
ug/g
(PP"i)
0.66 UK
0.92 Uk
TR-8
At
lira t lot
Road
S12
ug/g
(ppm)
0.33 UK
TR-9
At
Center
Road
S13
ug/y
(ppm)
1.6 UK
1.3 01
2.0 RS
0.76 UK
0.66 UK
NOTES: 1)1 - Isomer or similar compound.
UK - Unknown, not in NBS library.
RS - Reasonable detection, retention time compatibility.
-------
Tittabawassee River Sediment Analyses
Tentatively Identified Compounds
(continued)
CAS
Number
Station Number:
Sample Number:
Parameter
84ER04
3913-02-8 1-octanol , 2-butyl
1002-69-3 Decane, 1-chloro-
629-97-0 Docosane
7098-22-8 Tetratetracontane
27554-26-3 1,2-benzenedicarboxylic acid,
di tsooctylester
55334-42-4 Dodecane, 1,2-dibromo-
131-16-8 l,2-benzenedicarboxyl1c acid,
di propylester
1560-92-5 Hexadecane, 2-methyl-
3508-00-7 Heptadecane, 1-bromo-
22599-96-8 Cholestan-3-ol, 2-methylene-,
(3.beta., 5.alpha.)-
1745-81-9 Phenol, 2-(2-propenyl)
2380-18-9 Octadecanoic add, 2-oxo-, methylester_
32391-46-1 2H-2,4A-ethanonaphthalen-
8(5H)-one, l,3,4,6,8A-hexa
6269-92-7 Octane, 1,2-dibromo-
18344-37-1 Heptadecane. 2,6,10,14-tetramethyl-
28080-85-5 10-undecenoic acid, octylester-
593-45-3 Octadecane
TR-1
Above
Ash
Pond
SOI
ug/g
(PP"0
0.69 UK
0.96 UK
TR-2
Below
Ash
Pond
S02
ug/g
(PP"i)
1.1 UK
1.0 UK
2.5 UK
2.1 UK
1.1 01
0.46 UK
1.1 01
1.9 UK
1.1 UK
0'.54 UK
0.65 UK
0.95 UK
0.58 UK
TR-3
Above
Llngle
Drain
S03
ug/g
(ppm)
0.65 UK
0.62 UK
2.2 UK
0.79 UK
2.7 RS
TR-4
Smith's
Crossing
SOS
ug/g
(ppm)
2.1 UK
TR-5
Upstream
of Brown
Mills
S07
ug/g
(ppm)
TR-6
At
Freeland
Road
S08
ug/g
(ppm)
TR-7
At
Titta.
Road
S09
ug/g
(ppm)
TR-8
At
Gratlot
Road
S12
ug/g
(PPm)
TR-9
At
Center
Road
S13
ug/g
(ppm)
1.8 UK
NOTES: 01 - Isomer or similar compound.
UK - Unknown, not in NBS library.
RS - Reasonable detection, retention time compatibility.
-------
Tlttabawassee River Sediment Analyses
Tentatively Identified Compounds
(continued)
CAS
Number
112-44-7
107-51-7
4443-60-1
55401-55-3
3731-38-2
1560-84-5
17364-34-0
629-05-0
79-34-5
4562-27-0
54889-97-3
49607-51-4
112-80-1
56554-99-5
52783-43-4
38653-28-0
56554-64-4
56781-85-2
Station Number:
Sample Number: 84ER04
Parameter
Undecanal
Trislloxane, octamethyl-
Cyclohexane, (1-hexyltetradecyl)-
Oocosane, 11-decyl-
l-azab1cyclo[2.2.2]octan-3-one
Elcosane, 2-methyl-
6,9,12,15-docosatetraenolc acid,
methylester
1-octyne
Ethane. 1,1,2,2-tetrachloro-
4(lH)-pyr1mfd1none
Benzene, 1-(1,1-dlmethylethyl)
-4-(2-ethoxyethoxy)-
lH-l,2,4-tr1azol-3-amtne. 1-methyl-
9-octadecenolc add (z)-
3-octadecenal
Nonadecano)
Cyclopentanol, 2-(2-propynyloxy), trans-
Hexadecane, l.l-bis(dodecyloxy)-
Tricyclo[3.3.1.13,7]decan-2-one,
4-1odo-, 1.alpha.,3.
TR-1
Above
Ash
Pond
SOI
ug/g
(pp)
s-
TR-2
Below
Ash
Pond
S02
ug/g
(ppm)
TH-3
Above
tingle
Drain
S03
ug/g
(PP"0
TR-4
Smith's
Crossing
S05
ug/g
(pprc)
1.1 UK
0.58 UK
0.66 UK
0.88 Uk
1.2 UK
.2 UK
1.1 UK
..5 UK
0.45 UK
TR-5
Upstream
of Brown
Mills
S07
ug/g
(ppm)
TR-6
At
Freeland
Road
S08
ug/g
(ppnt)
TR-7
At
Tltta.
Road
S09
ug/g
(ppm)
0.46 UK
1.2 UK
03 w~
TR-8
At
Gratlot
Road
S12
ug/g
(ppf)
TR-9
At
Center
Road
SU
ug/g
(ppfli)
2.3 UK
0.58 01
0.67 UK
0.75 UK
T73 DT"
\8 UK
.2 UK
77 UK
J.5 UK
UK
NOTES: 01 - Isomer or similar compound.
UK - Unknown, not In NBS library.
RS - Reasonable detection, retention time compatibility.
-------
Tittabawassee River Flood Plain Analyses
Tentatively Identified Compounds
Station Number:
Sample Type:
Time:
Sample Number: 84ER04
Date:
CAS
Number Parameter
26489-01-0 6-octen-l-ol, 3,7-dimethyl-, ( )-
79-34-5 Ethane, 1,1,2,2-tetrachloro-
57-10-3 Hexadecanoic acid
52783-43-4 Nonadecanol
3913-02-8 1-octanol, 2-butyl-
17851-53-5 1,2-benzenedicarboxylic acid,
butyl-2-methylpropylester
10042-59-8 1-heptanol, 2-propyl-
7146-60-3 Octane, 2,3-dimethyl
1001-89-4 Heptane, 2-chloro-
630-06-8 Hexatriacontane
131-18-0 1,2-benzenedicarboxylic acid,
dipentylester
56259-10-0 Akuammilan-17-ol, 10-methoxy-
502-69-2 2-pentadecanone, 6,10,14-trimethyl
18344-37-1 Heptadecane, 2,6,10,14-tetramethyl
FP-1
Flood Plain
Tertiary
Pond
G
1550
S04
7/26/84
ug/g
(ppm)
0.53 UK
FP-2
Flood Plain
at White &
Debolt Drain
G
1940
S06
7/25/84
ug/g
(ppm)
1.1 RS
0.94 UK
0.69 UK
2.0 UK
2.6 UK
1.9 UK, 2.8 UK
2.4 UK
1.1 UK
1.1 RS
7.3 UK
3.0 UK
FP-3
Flood Plain
at
Tittabawassee Rd.
G
0915
S10
7/27/84
ug/g
(ppm)
3.8 UK
0.51 UK
0.99 UK
NOTES: 01 - Isomer or similar compound.
UK - Unknown, not in NBS library.
RS - Reasonable detection, retention time compatibility.
-------
Tittabawassee River Flood Plain Analyses
Tentatively Identified Compounds
(continued)
Station Number:
Sample Number: 84ER04
CAS
Number Parameter
1454-85-9 1-heptadecanol
55401-55-3 Docosane, 11-decyl-
3790-71-4 2,6,10-dodecatrien-l-ol,
3,7,11-trimethyl-, (Z,E)-
593-45-3 Octadecane
29354-98-1 Hexadecanol
7098-22-8 Tetratetracontane
143-28-2 9-octadecen-l-ol, (Z)-
10314-91-7 16,17-seco-24-nor-5.alpha.,
13.alpha., 14.beta., 17.alpha.-
1249-75-8 Cholan-24-oic acid, 3-hydroxy-,
methylester, (3.alpha., 5)
56847-03-1 6,9-octadecadiynoic acid, methylester
FP-1
Flood Plain
Tertiary
Pond
S04
ug/g
(ppm)
FP-2
Flood Plain
at White &
Debolt Drain
S06
ug/g
(ppm)
FP-3
Flood Plain
at
Tittabawassee Rd.
S10
ug/g
(ppm)
1.8 UK
2.7 UK
0.86 UK
3.0 01
3.2 UK
1.5 UK
0.96 UK
2.4 UK
0.55 UK
2.9 UK
NOTES: 01 - Isomer or similar compound.
UK - Unknown, not in NBS library.
RS - Reasonable detection, retention time compatibility.
-------
APPENDIX D
Bioaccumulation Studies
-------
APPENDIX D-l
PCDDs and PCDFs
1981 USEPA-MDNR Study
-------
MIDLAND
,?i~t ftivtr Copflutnct
2.3 Milts Upttreom
• i
•'"": DOW-'
CHEMICAL
. -STATION :A
^i R'ver
V . . ' SANF.C
STATION .B
-------
charger: Dow Chemical Co. Midland, Ml
pie Date: September 1-30, 1981
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION V
Eastern District Office
SAMPLE TYPE
PARAMETER
7.V7.8 TCDO 3
Hcotncl
Octachl
F. Polvch
2.3.7
Hexach
iloro mon^rs
loro laoiMri
lorinated Dlbenzo
7 TCDF
iloro Uomc- 1
>loro Itomers
Flfh Food
Fish Food
pg/g/
Jljsomers)
•P-oinxIn*
< 6
< 10
< *o
< go
20
70/f4)
< 10
< 20
< 40
< 90
Control
Caged Fish
Day
0
pg/g/
(1 Isomers)
7
7
< 10
< ?o
< 00
< go
10
60/<1)
< 10
< 20
. < 40
5 90
IA
Son ford Dom
Caged Fish
Day'
28
P9/9/
(1 Isoincrt)
< q
< IQ
< 90
< AQ •
< "Q
8
8/m
< 10
< 20
< 40
< 90
1}
Tlttabawassee RIvtr
Near Poseyvllle Road
Caged Fish
Day
28
P9/V
I Isotners]
8
8
<'Q
<'Q
<o
< ?o
< *o
< ^o
no
«;floo/(7)
S90/(6^
< 20
< J.O
< 90
Day
. 28
Dup
P9/9/
(1 Isomers
80 |
1 770/rO |
s'Q'^)
< ?Q
< 40
1 * % 1
5!
85007 U
8700/f61
< 20
< 40
< 90
IB
Grand River
9
Jones Road
Caged Fish
Day
28
pg/g/
(1 Isomers)
< 5
< '
-------
APPENDIX D-2
Other Organic Pollutants
1981 USEPA-MDNR Study
-------
?ir* Rivtr Cocflutnct
2.3 Milts Upjfreom
MIDLAND
• t
:.'•: DOW-
CHEMI.CAL
•STATION :"A
Sonford
Lake
TiUabawossee
^yi R»ver
V . SANF.
STATION .B
Jones
- Rood
6 miles to
-------
larger: Dow Chemical, Midland, Ml
D1o Study
ie Date: September 1-30, 1901
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
RFG10N V
Eastern District Office
TYPE
TER
GANICS
Qase/Neutral
Phenanthrene
Naphthalene
Bis[2-ethvlhexyl) .
Dhthalate
Di-n-Butv) phthalate
1 .2-01chlorobenzone
1.3-Dic.hlorobt>n7ene
1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene .
1 .2.4-Trichlorohenzene
HcAflchlorobejizene
•
Acid Extractabl«
2.4.G-Tricfi1orf)ptlf*nOl
Pentachloroohenol
Phonnl
I
1
Control •
Fish
°8/
pS/kg
60
84
2700
..
_.
._
_.
..
-.
..
--
Day
Du°p
p9/kg
_.
62
.
_
mm
mm
m-
' Sanford Dam
Caged Fish
°K
pg/kg
._
..
..
_.
__
..
._
..
..
..
-,
140»
•
*
rf/k,
._
..
95
mm .
mm
mm
mm
mm
,.
mm
mm
mm.
Day
28
Dup.
*m.
mm
mm
260
150
..
..
..
..
..
..
-,
THtabawassee River
Near Poseyvllle Roac
Caged Fish
Day
14.
pg/kg
.-
..
.
.
,
.
.
..
..
..
__
100a
Day
28
V9A9
72
..
1200
•
..
..
mm
no
160
630
mm
Day
28
Dup.
V9A9
..
22
..
_.
_.
..
..
--
..
.
,.
..
--
12
TUtabawassee River
Upstream of
fiutfaii rm
Caged Fish
Day
14
V9A9
—
-.
..
• ..
_.
. .
..
..
..
..
.-
--
Day
28
U9A9
--
.-
21
_.
•_.
..
..
..
--
mm
mm
mm
Dup.
V9A9
..
• ^
360
78
...
..
..
• ..
..
mm
mm
mm
13
Tittabawassee River
Outfall 031 Mixing Zone
Caged Fish
Day
2
*/*
34
60
--
70
^60
17Q
160
160Q
w-
870
Day
4
*n*
—
28
..
84
140
220
260
2400
46
»*
1300
Day
8
,9/K9
--
..
-.
._
26
120
1
JLI
20
'00
..
,
^^
900
Day
14
,9/4
"
-.
..
...
48
150
160
T20~5
..
_ —
— ^
Day
14
Dup.
pg/kg
—
—
.-
..
62
130
-m-
.-
— .
— ^
Day
21
pg/kg
--
--
390
..
250
280
T800
84
. _
500
Day
28
.g/X
•-
--
..
..
..
90
110
1900
120
140
1000
>,OJ 1-i, 1
•) r»3 I
0 0
•-g A
--
r --
--
--
..
12L
14C
I90C
HC
_»
900
- • Less than detection ' a
Sample matrix caused reduced resolution between native phenol and the ds phenol surrogate spike.
As a result, the presence of phenol Is not confirmed In this sample.
-------
charger: Oow Chemical, Midland, Ml
Oio StuJy
pic Date:
September 1-30, 1981
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION V
Eastern District Office
iPLE TYPE
5AMETER
RGAN1CS
Base/Neutnil
1,3-Dfch1ornhpn»p_n,p
• 1 . 4-D1 ch 1 proben ?pne
JL2.4-THrhlnrnhpn7Pni»
01-n-Butvl nhtha^tfi
BISfZ-rthvJhMvMphMiiilat*
Naphthalene
Phenanjhrene
l,2-Dichloroben2pnP
Olethvl ohth^late
. Add Extractables
14
Tittabawassee River
D/S of Outfall 031
Caged Fish
Day
14
wg/kg
E6
no...
fi«iO
150
—
34
Nene
Day
20
wg/kg
7?
70
7
• •.
• — -
w»
_-
-.
MM
Day
28
wg/kg
*«•
*•
•••
V •»
62
3000
24
__
„„
Day
28
Dyp
wg/kg
^ —
<•••
^^
120
— —
*•
'W
Grand Ulvor at Jones Road
Native Fish
/
82LS07
SOI
wg/kg
-
^m
m ~
* —
_.
^^
— —
02LS07
S02
wg/kg
.
— ml
ft *
• *
•»•
— ^
82LS07
S03
wg/kg
— B
52
320
22
02LS07
SOI
wg/kg
— ^
100
1700
82LS07
SOS
wg/kg
— ^
78
660
Grand
River
Native
Fish
82LS07
SOS
vg/^g
— —
<• •
„ _
- • Less than detection
-------
arger: Dow Chemical Co., Midland, MI Bio Sludy
e Date: September 1-30, 1901
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
IUIGION V
Eastern District Office
v>
E TYPE
•flctsblei Qualitative
nioxolanp-4-Mpthnnol
2.2-d1methv1
iildehvdf?
n. 2-oentvl
f pn-?-Onp
Heptad1en-?-One.6-
,npn-?-Onp
hlorobenzene i sowers
tpnal^^-butvl
ene areMr .iHrf, alpf
methoxv psfprs of
/trhlf)ro bpn.'pnp
£np acetic acid
nten-2-One.5 ohenvl
Bi nhenvl. 2-phenox\
ycjohexen-1-ono.
3,5-dimethyl
-Nonadl ena 1
lohexanone
jten-2-Une,4-PhenyT
rohexanol
Control
Caged Fish
Day
0
pg/kg
340Q
fl
-------
Discharger: 2ow chemical Co., Midland, Ml B1o Study''
Sample Date: September 1-30, 1981
U. S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGCNCY
REGION V
Eastern District Office
SAMPLE TYPE
4METERS
Fxtractah]*? Qualitative Analy
1 *^»ni njcf»1 An/>-4»M/»thiinnl
? 9-Hnfy1
VOrtpn-P-Onf1
1,^-llppl.iH1f»n.7-nno.fi.
mothyl
l-Nnnpn-7-flnp
Trirhlnrnhpn^pnp iPnp
Rpn?»np. »th^nvl
Nltrnjis aHH.^-yelnKpyyl *gAg
nnn
?floo
4QOO
13000
• '
82LS07
S03
vg/kg
^no
3200
82LS07
S04
pg/kg
.
82LS07
SOS
wgAg
MOO
..
5100
..
--
..
..
w .
m m
,.
7200
17000
7000
Grand
River
Natlvt
F1sh
82LS07
S06
pg/kg
..
..
__
__
..
• -
..
..
.•
.»
» ,
„.
,»
.»
(1) Concentration based on a comparison of the total 1on area of the compound with that of the internal standard.
« • Less than detection .
-------
"
X/l.
90S
ZOS120
aMlCN
£3
--
--
—
-•
--
--
.-
651/6"
SOS
--
• -
--
--
--
--
--
M/M
»os
£05128
(JVS
02^
--
--
--
'OOU
--
6^/61
EOS
iOSliO
MIJ<
--
0091
--
—
--
6,/6«
20S
>A|1«?N
•-
—
--
002Z
uuut
OOH
—
--
•vw
IOS
^OS128
peon sauop IP JOAHJ pueag
(If
—
—
—
—
~
—
Ki
*"••
•dnQ
82
--
--
--
--
*™
~
~
6))/6rt
XBQ
•
--
—
--
-•
~
Old
— -
6>|/6rt
A"OQ
qsij paSeo
peoa sauof
)« U3A^ pUBJg
fll
•-
--
--
--
-- •
"•
avx
•dna
82
XOQ
••
•-
-™
• •
--
0016'
""
4/M
82
--
--
-•
•••
•—
6>t/6rt
A"CQ
«.U P-O
U)B3JaSU«OQ ^H 59 '2
J3A^ oasscMpqs;^n
SI
••
••
~*
••
••
00 It
65)/5rt
•dna
82
™"
•"
•*
~™
••"•
6)|/6rt
82
..
*"
™ ™"
'
•••
°3 U )
6)|/6t
H
OU P'6.0
OU02 tiu^xjH
ICO Iteiino jo s/0
[ vi
^rtudi^d y duu ^ ud^iiy (,
maui^Q-§ £ -dito-l-U3xoyo[3X3-2
PL3W 3L^d3\/ OUO^UOQ
ISAIVNV 3Aiivinvno sjiavuvui
S«313HV>iV
3dAl 31JWVS
•
A NOKXTH
JOK3DV NOIIOSIOUd TVOK'BU«IIAK3 'S'Cl
TflCt 'OC-1 .'i
IW 'P"VIL>|W "CO trow up '«a :aoaix?vpsTa
-------
narger: Dow Chemical Co, Midland, MI, Bio Study
le Date: September 1-30, 1981
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION V
Eastern District Office
IE TYPE
\METER
!CS
B/Pesticide
drln
BHC
BHC
BHC
4-DDE
4 -DDT
eldrln
drln Aldehyde
jjtachlor pnoxld*
dosulfan^ sulfatt
otachlor
dHn
dosulfan II
B-1248
II -
1
Control •*.
Caged
F1sh
Day
0
vg/kg
8.70
— —
•* •
?ia
26°
w v
1?a
15*
m ^
mm
34b
..
.,
..
..
Day
0
Dup.
vg/kg
5 jb
m —
-w
7.8°
17b
_„
130
loD
— —
„_
._
r 1 Q
._
-.
..
) IA
Sonford Dam
Caged
Fish
Day .
14
pg/kg
"7 Ob"
• •»
mm
'™b
— »
17«>
13b
._
— —
_»
..
..
..
--
Day
28
vq/kq
-.
»*
ww
• ••
11°
.„
9-?°
H Sb
_
„
w
.
.
.
.-
Day
28
Dup.
vg/kg
5 9s
— —
. ..
P Qa
103
_»
5.1'
5,Zg
_
M
Tittabawassee River
Near Poseyvllle Road
Caged
Fish
Da/
14
vg/kg
• ••
5 4^
— m
w.
21*
17b
Mw
15*
15b
•
b
Day
28
vg/kg
I f !
is6'
MW
».
ww
__
_.
..
fl.44
_„
_„
._
..
..
_.
--
Day
28
Dup.
vg/kg
• v
9 la
5.3C
44"
323
..
39°
ISC
„.
mm
69
..
._
21D
46b
12
Tittabawassee River
Upstream of
Caged
Fish
Day
14
vg/kg
• .- •
10a
_,
__
mm
9 lb
17b
..
?3°
17a
9.51)
2"5r
..
.,
..
..
Day
28
vg/kg
5 9b
..
„•
_.
._
37*
20a
..
..
iaa
vw
_.
..
21b
..
.-
Day
28
Dup.
vg/kg
._
5.4"
ww
•m
..
42a
lea
..
33U
He
„_
..
..
18
._
-.
13
Tittabawassee River
Outfall 031 Mixing Zone
Catjcd
Fish
Day
2
vg/kg
70b
47°
fi lb
..
..
12a
26b
..
12a
700
7.4b
Day
4
vg/kg
„
57D
8 1°
._
..
12D
15b
..
14*
P.
Day
8
vg/kg
f,r
31U
6 2°
._
._
9.9b
.-
..
7.5»
121>
..
100
Z30T"
..
—
—
Day
14
vg/kg
100b
20D
5.5b
42J
40b
--
7. 1*
46*
..
46*>
23°
llb
--
—
--
Day
14
Dup.
vg/kg
121
99b
--
.-
..
26C
65a
.-
-|4*~
126
{6°
..
7.40
•-
—
—
Day
21
ug/kg
260»
TelF"
--
..
--
6.5b
TfOb
2?*
I?,1!
il°
26*
-.
-.
14°
63b
—
—
Day
28
«,«
250C
220b
24t-
--
16-
75b
S2b
^>7«i
7.8*
^liO- •
•-
65°
22i>
220
—
—
--
Day
28
Dup.
vg/k
ZfiOj.,..
no"
nD
. .
..
37J
.-
?T^
^5B—
T^U
17 1>
• •
10°
?*>c
--
.-
• Conflnncd on second column 8C/ECD
• Not confirmed on Second column GC/ECD
• Not confinned on second column due to interference
Less than detection
-------
Discharger: cow aitiiUc.il, Midland, MI Dio Study
Sample Date: septodxir 1-30, 1901
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION V
Eastern District Office
SAMPLE TYPE
PARAMETER
ORGAN (CS
0. PCB/Pesticide
Aldrin
. o-BHC
B-BHC
6-BHC
Y-BHC
4-4'-D)D
4,4'-DD£
4.4'-Dl
OieTdr
11
n
Endosu fan I
EndHn aldehyde -
Heotachlor eooxide
Endosulfan sulfate
Heptachlor
Endosulfan II
PCB-1260 ~
Tittabawassce River
D/S of Outfall 031
Mlvlrm 7nrt rt
Caged
Fish
Day
14
MA.
34a
43°
..
..
--
28a
IP
—
118
33°
Day
28
pg/kg
67"
58°
-.
--
-.
360
—
5.78
40D
9. Ob
37°
Day
28
Dup.
pg/kg
88C
570
..
..
7.60
363
16C
..
3D
20"
15
Tittabawassee River
2.C5 M1 Downstream
of Dew Da~i
Caged
Fish
Day
14
pg/kg
530
540
6. 60
-.
340
-21°
.-
13a
,7-7b..,
208
5.68
Day
28
pg/kg
..
5.68
..
._
.-
..
lia
--
..
—
Day
28
Dup.
pg/kg
56C
__
._
5.3°
36a
..
-.
158 .
27C
IflC
--
IB
Grand River
Jones Road
Caged
Fish
Day
14
pg/kg
..
9.7&
.•
„ »
6 1*
iga
__
23"
9. Ob
.-•
Day
28
pg/kg
».
5.2
m —
.—
16a
340.
—
Day
28
Dup.
vg/kg
• *
«••*
»*•
*•.
.* '
16a
140
*•»
aJ
—
IU
Grand River at Jones Road
Native Fish
8?LS07
SOI
pg/kg
— —
13 b
— —
7.5C
1308
1408
noc
-flf-
1 M.C
OOQ
-JBQ"
5109..
82LS07
S02
pg/kg
— w
— —
9.0C
18b
1903
150C
8.9b
94b
27C
lab
i*
5503
101Qa. .
82LS07
S03
vg/kg
-p *
— —
428
37a
48C
23a
16oa
82LS07
S04
v9/kg
•
_.
13b
IK
2408
240a
IftOc
llOb
24b
PIC
6403
82LS07
SOS
pg/kg
12b
7 6b
6 lb
300^
230C
173
150b
10208
136Q8
Grand
River
Native
Fish
82LS07
S06
pg/kg
_ ^
71b
1603
79c
7 2f
62c
14
_««_
b » Not confirmed on second column GC/ECD
c • Not confirmed on second column GC/ECD due to Interference
Less than detection
-------
III. DIOXIN METHODOLOGY AND QUALITY CONTROL
A. Method for Fish Analyses
3arcelle Columbus Laboratories, under subcontract 1-453-003-222-01
to CCAj performed the dioxin analyses. The objective of this study was to
anal^cj selected polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDF) and polychlorinated
dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDD) in fish. The detection limits specified for
these compounds were parts-per-trillion (1 part in 1012, or ppt) in fish.
Specific coapounds which were selected for identification included: -
2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzofuran (2,3,7,8-TCDF); -2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-
p-dioxia (2,3,7,8-TCDD), and all tetra through octa chloro furan and dioxin
isomer classes. High resolution gas chromatography/high resolution mass
spectronetry (HRGC/HRMS) was used to Identify and quantify these materials
at the indicated trace level. The exact masses used for each Isomer class
and the expected isotope ratio used in part for Identifying individual
compounds, as well as limits of detection for the fish are presented
in Table 1. 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin- C12 was used as an
internal standard for quantification and recovery determinations.
These recovery determinations are found in Table 2 and were used to
estimate the influence of the matrices on the analytical measurements.
Preparation of Fish Samples
The fish samples were extracted and cleaned up using the
following procedure. Approxinately 5 g portions of fish were placed
in 125 ml round bottom flasks. The fish samples were spiked with 2 ng
of 2,3,7,8-TCDD-*3C,2 internal standard followed by the addition of
20 ml of ethanol and 20 ml of 40 percent KOH. The samples were digested
for one hour at 80*C. After cooling, they were extracted three times
each with 10 ml volumes of hexane. The combined hexane extracts weree
transferred to 125 ml separatory funnels and washed three times each
with 10 ml of distilled water. The hexane extracts were concentrated
to 5 ml using K-D apparatus. Each concentrate was transferred to a
multilayered silica column containing the following materials oriented
top to bottom:
Activated silica
Silica containing 44 percent concentrated sulfuric acid
Activated silica
Silica containing 33 percent 1M sodium hydroxide
Activated silica
These columns were eluted with 30 ml of 1:1 (V:V) benzenerhexane.
The benzene:hexane fraction was exchanged into 5 ml of hexane and transferred
to alunina columns. The alumina column was eluted sequentially with 25 ml
of hexane, 25 nl of 1:1 (V:V) hexane:carbon tetrachloride, and 20 ml of
1:1 (V:V) hexane:raethylene chloride. Decane (20 ul) was added to the
hexaneriaethylene chloride fraction, and these mixtures were concentrated
to 20 ul prior to their analyses.
-------
The extracts were analyzed by high resolution gas chroma tography/
high resolution mass spectrometry (HRGC/HRMS) at a mass resolution of
8000-12000
-------
Blanks
Along with the actual fish samples two grinding blanks and two
dioxir.-"ree fish filet samples were analyzed. Battelle also extracted .and
anal /.-.m a solvent blank. The only reported levels of furans in any blank
were i« ?g in the grinding blank (dry ice) prepared before fish sample
grinding and 95 ppt in the blank perch filet EPA-V-17. The source of
the 10 pg tecrachlorinated dibenzofuran in the grinding blank is not known.
The concentration of 10 pg per saaple jar rinse .cannot be converted to
ppt, so data is uncorrected.
1) 82LS10R02
Originally, only five grams of the filet was taken for analysis.
95 ppt 2,3,7,8-TCDF was reported for this first run. A suppression at the
prefluorokerosene lock mass appeared, creating an artifically low
2,3,7,8~TCDD-C*3 signal. This suppression caused all quantitation to be
biased high. The remaining 5 grams of filet were extracted and put through
an additional florisil clean-up and the suppression disappeared.
No 2,3,7,8-TCDF was reported for this aliquot.
Spikes
Four spiked fish filets were obtained from Dr. Harless at RTF
and sent as "blinds" to Battelle for analysis. However, since the appearance
of the samples EPA-V-21-2, EPA-V-20, EPA-V-21, and EPA-V-22 differed from
the actual sample catfish pastes, they were not actually "blinds".
Battelle, however, did not know which filets, if any, were blanks and
they did not know the isomers or levels used in spiking.
A nearly consistent lack of recovery of OCDF and OCDD at
levels of 100-200 ppt occurred. This nay be due to the fact that the
spike levels used were near or at the detection limit. In conversations
with Battelle, it was discovered that OCDD and OCDF have varying response
factors relative to C^-TCDD. These results are therefore estimated
against 2,3,7,8-TCDD-C13 as no pure certified OCDD and OCDF standards
were available. Such quantitation may be biased low for the sample
results. No OCDD or OCDF was reported above the contract detection
limit of 90 ppt in any of the samples.
820IS22 (EPA-V-22)
This spiked filet QC sample yielded high (277Z) recovery of
2,3,7,8-TCDF and low 2,3,7,8-TCDD recovery (54%). The spectral data
was recalled off of the disc and the results recalculated. A suppression
of the 2,3,7,8-Cl3 signal occurred. The usual Battelle procedure is
to go back and rerun the extract through an additional florisil column.
This was done and the unsuppressed signals yielded 168Z recovery for
2,3,7,8-TCDF and 922 recovery 2,3,7,8-TCDD. The recovery for
2,3,7,8-TCDF was still high due to reappearing mass interference at
mass 304 of TCDF.
-------
CONCLUSION
Due to the imprecise and low biased OCDD and OCDF recovery discovered in
blind spike audits, any positive OCDD and OCDF data for fish samples should
not be considered valid. All other dioxin/furan sample data should be
r-sd of an acceptable level of quality.
-------
TABLE 1. SELECTED DATA FOR THE POLYCHLORINATED DIBEN7.0FURANS AND
POLYCHLORINATE1) DIDENZO-P-DIOXINS OF INTEREST
Limit of
Accurate mass Theoretical Isotope Detection
Compounds
Te trachlorod ib enzo fur an
Te tr achlo rod ib enzo-p-d ioxin
Pcntachlorod ibenzofuran
Pentachlorodibcnzo-p-dioxln
Hexachlorodibenzofuran
Hexachlorod ib enzo-p-d ioxin
Hep tachlorod ibenzofuran
Hep tachlorodibenzo-p-d ioxin
Octachlorodibenzofuran
Oc tachlorodibenzo-p-d ioxin
Low Mass
303.9016
319.8965
339.8597*
355.8546*
373.8207*
389.8156*
407.7817*
423.7766*
441.7428
457.7377
High Mass
305.8987*
321.8936
341.8567
357.8517
375.8178
391.8127
409.7788
425.7737
443.7398*
459.7347
Ratio
.77
.77
1.54
1.54
1.23
1.23
1.03
1.03
0.88
0.88
Water
10 ppq
10 ppq
20 ppq
20 ppq
40 ppq
40 ppq
80 ppq
80 ppq
•100 ppq
100 ppq
Fish
.5 ppt
5 ppt
20 ppt
20 ppt
40 ppt
40 ppt
80 ppt
80 ppt
100 ppt
100 ppt
* Quantitation Mass
-------
TABLE 2. INTERNAL STANDARD RECOVERIES OF
2,3,7,8-TETRACHLORODIBENZO-P-DIOXIN-l3C12
IN FISH
Fish Recoveries
Sample Naae Internal Standard
Recovery (X)
82LS10R04 52
82LS10R02 50
82LS10R01 56
82LS05S01 93
82LS05S02 89
81LS15S08 56
81LS11S01 59
81LS17S01 86
81LS17S03 57
81LS17S06 72
81LS17S07 47
82LS07S05 49
82LS07506 . 51
-------
TABLE 3. DOW FISH BLANK RESULTS
UNITS: ppt
1 IBattellelDry Ice**I Dry Ice**| 82L510R02 I820I07R15
1Solvent iBefore (After | EPA-V-17
I SOV.E?. I3lank 18 2L205S02182L505S02|Run 1 |Run~2T
2,3,7,8-TCD?
2,3,7,8-TCDD
Tetra CD?
Tetra CDD
Penta CD?
Penta CDD
Hexa CDF
Hexa CDD
Hepta CDF
Hepta CDD
Octa CDF
Octa CDD
<(7)
<(4)
<(4)
<(4)
<(D
<(1)
<(2)
<(5)
<(D
<(2)
<(4)
<(3)
< 5
< 5
10
< (2)
<(20)
< (7)
<(12)
<(17)
< (6)
<(25)
<(11)
< 5
< 5
< (4)
< (2)
<(19)
<(37)
<(19)
< (9)
<(12)
< (4)
-------
TABLE 4. DOW FISH SPIKE RESULTS
UNITS: Z recovery
JE?A-V-21-2|EPA-V-20 IEPA-V-21 IEPA-V-22 |Spike (ppt)
{82LS10R04 j82LS10R0111820I07S20\820I07S22JLevels
ISCMZR
2,3,7,8-TCDDi
2,3,7,3-TCDFl
1,3,6,8-TCDDJ
1,3,7,9-TCDDJ
OCDO I
OCDF 1
173
70
105* -
105*
0
0
80
125
92*
92*
75
64
103
154
60
115
0
0
54
-277
88
130
0
0
10- 30
20- 40
10- 33
•3- 10
100-200
100-200
*Isomers not quantified spearately.
-------
APPENDIX D-3
Dow Chemical Biouptake Study
October, 1985
-------
STATE OF MICHIGAN
NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION
THOMAS j ANDERSON JAMES J. BUVNCHARD. Governor
E R CAROLLO
ST^NJ! %££? DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
O STEWART MYERS STEVENS T MASON BUILDING
RAYMOND PCXJPORE BOX 30028
HARRY H WHITELEY LANSING. Ml 48909
RONALD O SKOOG. Oreclor
March 21, 1986
Mr. Gary Amendela
U.S. EPA - Region V
Eastern District Office
25089 Center Ridge Road
Westlake, Ohio 44145
Dear Gary,
Please find enclosed, copies of the Dow Chemical Company October, 1985
Fish Biouptake Study and the Michigan Department of Public Health "Back-
ground Document Concerning 1986 Fish Consumption Advisory for Dioxin
Contaminated Fish."
If you have any questions, please contact me.
Sincerely,
£6~-
Linn Duling
Aquatic Biologist
Toxic Chemical Evaluation Section
Surface Water Quality Division
517-373-2190
Enclosure
-------
.0°
DOW CHEMICAL U.S.A.
December 31, 1985 M1CMIGAN OIVISION
MIOCANO. MICHIGAN 486*0
Mr. Paul Zugger, Chief
Surface Water Quality Division
MI Dept. of Natural Resources
P.O. Box 30028
Lansing, MI 48909
Dear Mr. Zugger:
SUBJECT: FISH BIO-UPTAKE STUDY, SPECIAL CONDITION 9, NPOES PERMIT
10000868
In accordance with Special Condition 9 of the NPOES permit issued to
Dow Chemical's Midland location on May 17, 1984, a fish bio-uptake
study has been performed following the study conditions described in:
Dow Chemical letter to MDNR, December 18, 1984
MDNR letter to Dow Chemical, April 15, 1985
Dow Chemical letter to MDNRTJune 26, 1985
MDNR letter to Dow Chemical, August 20, 1985
A laboratory study only was performed.
Water chemistry measurements taken in the exposure chambers during the
course of the study are shown in Table 1. The results of the analyses
of whole and gutted fish samples are shown in Tables 2 to 4. Table 2
contains the results for the fish at the beginning of the study.
Table 3 shows the results for fish exposed for 28 days to 100%
Tittabawassee River water. The results for fish exposed to 15%
effluent and 85% Tittabawassee River water for 28 days are shown in
Table 4. If there are any questions or concerns regarding this study,
please don't hesitate to telephone.
Sincerely,
W. I. Delaney #
Technical Manager
Environmental Services
628 Building
(517)636-3595
clr
Attachments
-------
TABLE 1
FISH BIO-UPTAKE STUDY
WATER CHEMISTRY MEASUREMENTS
100% River Water
15% Effluent/85% River Water
10/2/85
10/4/85
10/7/85
10/9/85
10/11/85
10/14/85
10/16/85
10/18/85
10/21/85
10/23/85
10/25/85
10/28/85
Temp.
•c
15.0
17.0
17.5
16.5
16.7
16.5
15.0
15.5
17.0
17.5
17.0
14.0
D.O.
mg/l
9.4
8.0
8.3
8.4
8.6
8.4
9.0
8.9
7.8
8.1
7.8
9.4
•
PH
7.1
7.7
8.1
8.2
8.0
8.2
7.9
8.0
8.1
7.9
8.1
8.1
Conductivity
^mhos/cm
598
500
591
581
548
441
497
497
510
526
570
606
Temp.
•c
18.5
20.5
21.0
20.0
17.8
19.0
17.5
18.0
19.0
19.5
20.0
16.0
0.0.
mg/L
9.4
8.2
9.2
8.4
8.9
8.6
9.1
8.9
8.5
8.2
8.5
9.4
pH
7.1
7.8
8.1
8.1
8.0
8.1
7.9
8.1
8.0
7.9
8.2
8.1
Conductivity
^mhos/cm
1.534
1,420
1,293
1,563
1,482
1,278
1,301
1,084
907
1,134
1,152
1,149
-------
TABLE 2
FISH BIO-UPTAKE STUDY
DAY ZERO FISH
(All results in ppm unless otherwise specified)
Whole Fish Gutted Fish
Acrylonitrlle NQ(0.004) NQ(0.004)
Aldrin NQ(1.8) NQ(1.8)
alpha-BHC NQ(3.6) NQ(3.6)
Aniline NQ(2.6) NQ(2.6)
1,2-01 chlorobenzene NQ(0.004) NQ(0.004)
i,3-D1chlorobenzene NQ(0.004) NQ(0.004)
1.4-01chlorobenzene NQ(0.004) NQ(0.004)
2,4-01chlorophenol NQ(0.8) NQ(0.8)
Heptachlor Epoxlde NQ(0.6) NQ(0.6)
Hexachlorobenzene NQ(0.04) NQ(0.04)
PCB Isomers
Oichloro- NQ(2.3) NQ(2.3)
Trlchloro- NQ(2.3) NQ(2.3)
Tetrachloro- NQ(2.3) NQ(2.3)
Pentachloro- NQ(2.3) NQ(2.3)
Hexachloro- ~ NQ(2.3) NQ(2.3)
Pentachlorobenzene NQ(O.Oll) NQ(O.Oll)
Pentachlorophenol NQ(1.9) NQ(1.9)
1,2,3,4-Tetrachlorobenzene NQ(0.007) NQ(0.007)
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene NQ(0.006) NQ(0.006)
2,3,7,8-TCOO 0.7 ppt 0.7 ppt
2,3,7,8-TCDF* 2.4 ppt 2.1 ppt
1,2,3-Trlchlorobenzene NQ(2.1) NQ(2.1)
1.2,4-Trlchlorobenzene NQ(O.OOOl) NQ(O.OOOl)
2,4,5-Trlchlorophenol NQ(O.Oll) NQ(O.Oll)
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol NQ(O.Oll) NQ(O.Oll)
*Qual1fied: Isomer specificity cannot be proven.
-------
TABLE 3
FISH BIO-UPTAKE STUDY
DAY 28 FISH
EXPOSED TO 1001 RIVER WATER
(All results 1n ppm unless otherwise specified)
Whole Fish Gutted Fish
Acrylonitrile NQ(0.004) NQ(0.004)
AldMn NQ(1.8) NQ(1.8)
alpha-BHC NQ(3.6) NQ(3.6)
Aniline NQ(2.6) NQ(2.6)
1,2-01chlorobenzene NQ(0.004) NQ(0,004)
1,3-DIchlorobenzene NQ(0.004) NQ(0.004)
1,4-01chlorobenzene NQ(0.004) NQ(0.004)
2,4-Oichlorophenol NQ(0.8) NQ(0.8)
Heptachlor Epoxlde NQ(0.6) NQ(0.6)
Hexachlorobenzene 0.022 0.017
PCS Isomers
Dlchloro- NQ(2.3) HQ(2,3)
Trlchloro- NQ(2.3) NQ(2.3)
Tetrachloro- ~ NQ(2.3) NQ(2.3)
Pentachloro- NQ(2.3) NQ(2.3)
Hexachloro- NQ(2.3) NQ(2.3)
Pentachlorobenzene NQ(O.Oll) 0.2
Pentachlorophenol NQ(1.9) NQ(1.9)
1,2,3,4-Tetrachlorobenzene 1.1 2.3
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene 1.5 0.5
2,3,7,8-TCDO 0.9 ppt 0.9 ppt
2,3,7,8-TCDF* 2.4 ppt 2.4 ppt
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene NQ(2.1) NQ(2.1)
1,2,4-Trlchlorobenzene NQ(O.OOOl) NQ(O.OOOl)
2,4,5-Trlchlorophenol NQ(O.Oll) NQ(O.Oll)
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol NQ(O.Oll) NQ(O.Oll)
*Qualified: Isomer specificity cannot be proven.
-------
TABLE 4
FISH BIO-UPTAKE STUDY
DAY 28 FISH
EXPOSED TO 15% EFFLUENT/85% RIVER WATER
(All results In ppm unless otherwise specified)
Whole F1sh , Gutted F1sh
Acrylonltrlle NQ{0.004) NQ(0.004)
Aldrin NQ(1.8) NQ(1.8)
alpha-BHC NQ(3.6) NQ(3.6)
Aniline NQ(2.6) NQ(2.6)
1,2-Dichlorobenzene NQ(0.004) NQ(0.004)
1,3-Dichlorobenzene NQ(0.004) NQ(0.004)
1,4-Dichlorobenzene NQ(0.004) NQ(0.004)
2,4-D1chlorophenol NQ(0.8) NQ(0.8)
Heptachlor Epoxlde NQ(0.6) NQ(0.6)
Hexachlorobenzene 3.7 0.2
PCB Isomers
Dichloro- NQ(2.3) NQ(2.3)
Trichloro- NQ(2.3) NQ(2.3)
Tetrachloro- - NQ(2.3) NQ(2.3)
Pentachloro- NQ(2.3) NQ(2.3)
Hexachloro- NQ(2.3) NQ(2.3)
Pentachlorobenzene 0.5 f NQ(O.Oll)
Pentachlorophenol NQ(1.9) NQ(1.9)
1,2,3,4-Tetrachlorobenzene - . • 1.0 NQ(0.007)
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene 4.9 NQ(0.006)
2,3,7,8-TCOO 1.2 ppt 1.2 ppt
2,3,7,8-TCOF* . 2.5 ppt . 2.3 ppt
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene NQ(2.1) NQ(2.1)
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 0.29 0.5
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol NQ(O.Oll) NQ(O.Oll)
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol NQ(O.Oll) NQ(O.Oll)
*Qualified: Isomer specificity cannot be proven.
-------
APPENDIX E
Supplemental Environmental Studies
-------
APPENDIX E
SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
In addition to the environmental studies presented in this report, several
other related studies of the Tittabawassee River, Saginaw River and Saginaw Bay
have been conducted by or for USEPA Region V, USEPA's Great Lakes National
Program Office (GLNPO), the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (USFDA), the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE) and
the New York Departments of Health (NYDH) and Environmental Conservation.
Those supplemental environmental studies are briefly summarized below. This is
not an exhaustive review of the available literature, however. Details of
study design, sample preparation and analytical methods, concentrations detected
at other sites in control fish, and the results for all species sampled have
been omitted for the sake of brevity.
A. Contaminants in Fish and Birds
1. PCDDs and PCDFs
Concentrations of 2378-TCDD in skinless filets of Tittabawassee River fish
collected below Dow Dam in July 1978 under the direction of USEPA and analyzed
by Harless and co-workers at USEPA's Health Effects Research Laboratory in
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, ranged from 10 ppt in a yellow perch to
695 ppt in a channel catfish. The contamination was found to extend to the
mouth of the Saginaw River, with levels in the range 30 to 105 ppt in channel
catfish. A Saginaw Bay sucker was found to contain 4 ppt. Other PCDDs
tentatively identified in Tittabawassee River fish were trichlorodibenzo-p-
dioxins and pentachlorodibenzo-p-dioxins.l
Carp, channel catfish, sucker and yellow perch collected in 1979 from Saginaw
Bay were analyzed by O'Keefe and co-workers at NYDH and showed levels of
2378-TCDD of 26, 20, 2.5 and nondetectable (NO), respectively.2
The USFDA also reported finding TCDDs in fish from Saginaw Bay.3 Analyses
performed by USFDA on edible filets of 27 fish collected from Saginaw Bay in
1979 gave four positive results for TCDDs (21 to 45 ppt). Subsequent analyses
by USFDA of a Saqinaw Bay filet composite of carp collected in 1981 showed
68 ppt 2378-TCDD.J
In 1980 Hallett and Norstrum of the Canadian Wildlife Service reported
2378-TCDD in herring gull eggs collected in 1980 at 12 different locations in
tne Great Lakes.4 The highest levels of 2378-TCDO were found in Saginaw
Bay eggs (43-86 ppt). Background levels appeared to be in the range 2-3 ppt.
Greater than 90% of all the PCDDs detected in all the eggs analyzed was
2378-TCDD.
-------
- 2 -
Analyses of single composites of whole carp from the Tittabawassee River and
Saginaw Bay (collected in 1978) and individual herring gull eggs (collected in
1980) for PCDOs and PCDFs were conducted by Stalling and co-workers at the
National Fisheries Research laboratory of the USFWS in Columbia, Missouri.5
TCODs and TCDFs, respectively, in Tittabawassee River and Saginaw Bay carp,
respectively, were 81 and 37, and 94 and 27 ppt. Tetra- through octa- CDFs and
tetra-, hexa- and octa-CODs were detected in Saginaw Bay herring gull eggs
supplied to Or. Stalling by Or. Hallett, confirming the latter's -earlier
findings. The highest concentrations of 2378-TCDD and 2378-TCOF in Saginaw Bay
herring gull eggs were 165 and 4 ppt, respectively. Greater than 90% of the
dioxins and furans detected were substituted in the 2378-positions.
The results of most of the above studies, and related Dow Chemical studies,
are summarized in the USEPA staff document entitled, "A Report On Polychlon'nated
Dibenzo-p-Dioxins (PCDDs) and Polychlon'nated Dibenzofurans (PCDFs): A Summary
of Studies Conducted in the Great Lakes Area (July 1981)".
In 1982 Rohrer published the results of analyses performed by Harless and
co-workers at RTP on samples of carp collected in the area in 1980.6 Concen-
trations of 2378-TCDD in carp from the Tittabawassee River, Saginaw River and
Saginaw Bay ranged up to 142 ppt, 63 ppt and 61 ppt, respectively.
In 1983, USFDA collected fish from fifteen Michigan rivers and inland lakes
and analyzed composite edible portions of carp for 2378-TCDD at a working limit
of detection of 10 ppt. Only two of the sites showed detectable 2378-TCDD:
Muskegon Lake and the Tittabawassee River downstream of Dow Dam. The former
carp composite was measured at 11 ppt, while the latter was at 65 ppt.3 A 1983
report by a Michigan State University graduate student indicated widespread
contamination of rivers throughout Michigan with 2378-TCDD.7 The above study
found substantially lower levels in many of the streams.
In 1985 Stalling et al.8 reported that 2378-TCDD in herring gull egg
composites from a Saginaw Bay colony contained 141 ppt 2378-TCDD. In addition
samples of tern chicks and eggs collected from Saginaw Bay colonies contained
2378-TCDD in the range 21-35 ppt and 40-63 ppt, respectively.9
2. Other Contaminants
In 1976 Kuehl and co-workers at USEPA1s ERL-Duluth reported detection of
hexa-, hepta- and octachlorostyrene(s) in a composite of fish collected in
1974 from Saginaw Bay.10 Subsequently, in 1981, Kuehl and co-workers analyzed
Saginaw Bay whole fish composites of catfish and carp collected in 1980 and
quantified hexachlorobenzene at 5.0 ppb and octachlorostyrene at 110.7 ppb.11
Other chloroaromatic substances tentatively identified by Harless et al.l
in Tittabawassee River fish collected in 1978 included tetra-, penta- and
hexachlorinated diphenyl ethers, a trichlorobenzylphenyl ether, tetrachlorodi-
benzofurans, trichloroterphenyl and PCBs.
-------
- 3 -
Results of analyses of carp collected in 1983 from the Tittabawassee River,
Saginaw River and Saginaw Bay, as well as other sites in the Upper Great Lakes,
were published by Jaffe et al. in 1985.12 in addition to the banned pesticides
and PCBs, the authors found polychlorinated benzenes, tetra- and pentachloro-
anisole (PCA), octachlorostyrene (OCS) and polychlorinated diphenyl ethers
(PCDEs). OCS and PCA were highest from the Tittabawassee River Station #1 at
177 ppb and 4 ppb, respectively, while PCDEs were highest in the Saginaw River
and Bay at 38 and 18.6 ppb, respectively. The 1,2,4,5-tetra-, penta- and
hexachlorobenzene(s) were highest at the Tittabawassee River Station #1, at
236, 30.7 and 66 ppb, respectively. The 1,2,4,5-tetrachlorobenzene is the
immediate precursor of 2,4,5-TCP, from which 2,4,5-T is manufactured.
B. Contaminants in Sediments
1. PCDDs and PCDFs
Dow Chemical failed to detect TCDDs in its 1978 studies of Tittabawassee
River sediments. Accumulations of chlorophenols were noted, however.13
In 1984, Czuczwa and Hites published results of PCDD and PCDF analyses of
core samples of Saginaw River, Saginaw Bay and Lake Huron sediments. The
Saginaw River sediment samples were obtained from depositional zones outside of
the navigation channel. PCDDs and PCDFs were detected in all cores down to a
depth equivalent to a time period corresponding to about 1940.i4 Although
individual isomers were not quantified, totals for tetra- through octa-
homologues were reported. Results for the Saginaw River for TCDOs and TCDFs were
3200 ppt and 710 ppt, respectively. Corresponding concentrations in Lake Huron
were 78 ppt and ND, respectively.15
Gross et al. performed PCDO and PCDF analyses on Saginaw River and Bay
sediments in the Saginaw River navigation channel for the USACOE Detroit District
Office.16 Concentrations of TCDFs and TCDDs at a site near Gull Island at the
mouth of the Saginaw River were approximately 3000 and 1000 ppt, respectively.
Concentrations in the navigation channel taken just downstream of Essexville
(ERG-SR33), for example, were reported as 290 and 30 ppt, respectively. (Results
reported on a wet weight basis.) Follow-up studies by Gross et al. quantified
2378-TCDD in one sample of sediment collected from a sediment depositional zone
in the vicinity of Crow Island at 60 ppt.I7 An analysis of a split sample of the
same sediment by Smith and co-workers at the USFWS laboratory in Columbia,
Missouri, found 15 parts per trillion.1?
2. Other Substances
In a 1974 report by Sylvester, Tittabawassee River sediments contained
detectable levels of ODD and elevated levels of arsenic, copper, total chromium,
zinc, nickel and lead.l8 The Tittabawassee River sediments would have been
classified as heavily polluted with lead and zinc and moderately polluted with
nickel and arsenic based on USEPA guidelines for the classification of dredged
material published in 1977i9 and the data reported.
-------
- 4 -
Data reported by Rossmann et al. to GLNPO in 1982 indicate that some layers
of sediment collected via core sampling in 1981 just below Freeland Road and
the Tittabawassee Township POTW are heavily polluted with arsenic, barium,
chromium and total phosphorus; and arsenic, barium, chromium, manganese and
total phosphorus, respectively, based on 1977 EPA pollution classification
guidelines for Great Lakes sediments. In addition, the authors reported the
detection of di-, tri-, tetra- and pentachlorophenol(s); di-, tri-, tetra-,
penta- and hexachlorobenzene(s); PCBs; and 2,4,5-T and Silvex in higher
concentrations downstream than upstream of Dow Dam. Of the surface cores
collected (5-10 cm depth), the highest concentrations of 2,4,5-T and Silvex
were found in sediments just below Dow Chemical's Lingle Drain at 83.7 and 28.9
ug/kg, respectively.20
Analyses of Saginaw River and Saginaw Bay sediments were conducted for the
USACOE Detroit District Office to support the development of an Environmental
Impact Statement for planned dredging and disposal of portions of the Saginaw
River navigation channel.21 Bottom sediments of the Saginaw River were tested
during 1978, 1980 and 1983 for various contaminants at a number of sites in the
project area. Sediment samples varied in PCB concentrations from NO up to
27 ppm. Based on the 1977 EPA pollutional guidelines, of the 28 Saginaw River
and 11 Saginaw Bay sites sampled, all would be moderately polluted, while 12
and 3 sites, respectively, would be heavily polluted for one or more of the
inorganic parameters considered. Two Saginaw River sites would be heavily
polluted for PCBs.
-------
- 5 -
REFERENCES
1. Harless, R. et al., "Determination of 2378-Tetrachlorodibenzo-P-Dioxin in
Fresh Water Fish", Chemosphere, 11 (2): 193-198, 1982.
2. O'Keefe, P. et al., "Analysis of 2378-Tetrachlorodibenzo-P-Dioxin in Great
Lakes Fish", Chemosphere, 12 (3): 325-332, 1982.
3. DeVault, 0., Polychlorinated Dioxins and Polychlorinated Furans in Fish
from the Great Lakes and Midwest, GreatLakes NationalProgramOffice,
USEPA, Chicago, Illinois, October 1984.
4. Hallett, D. and Norstrom, R., 2,3,7,8-TCDD in Great Lakes Herring Gulls.
Canadian Fish and Wildlife Service,Reportto theInternationalJoint
Commission, December 1980.
5. Stalling, D. et al., "Residues of Polychlorinated Dibenzo-P-Dioxins and
Dibenzofurans in Laurentian Great Lakes Fish," in Human and Environmental
Risks of Chlorinated Dioxins and Related Compounds, R^Tucker arid"
A. Young, Plenum, New York: 221-240, 1983.
6. Rohrer, T., 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin Residues i"Fish from the
Tittabawassee and Saginaw Rivers and Saginaw Bay - 1980,StaffReport,
Office of Toxic Materials Control, Michigan Dept.ofNatural Resources,
Lansing, Michigan, September 1982
7. Kaczmar, S., Ph.D. Thesis, Michigan State University, 1983.
8. Stalling, D. et al., "Patterns of PCDD, PCDF, and PCB Contamination in
Great Lakes Fish and Birds and their Characterization By Principal
Components Analysis", Chemosphere, 14 (6/7): 627-643, 1985
9. Personal Communication with Howard Zar, Water Division, USEPA Region V,
Chicago, Illinois, May 1986.
10. Kuehl, D. et al., "Isolation and Identification of Polychlorinated Styrenes
in Great Lakes Fish", Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and
Toxicology. 16 (2): 127-132, 1976.
11. Kuehl, D., et al., "Quantification of Octachlorostyrene and Related
Compounds in Great Lakes Fish by Gas Chromatography—Mass Spectrometry",
J. Great Lakes Res.. 7 (3): 330-335, 1981.
12. Jaffe, R., et al., "Anthropogenic, Polyhalogenated, Organic Compounds
in Sedentary Fish from Lake Huron and Lake Superior Tributaries and
Embankments", J. Great Lakes Res., 11 (2): 256-162, 1985.
-------
- 6 -
13. Gledhill, T., General Manager, Michigan Division, Dow Chemical Company,
letter to John Hesse, Chief, Office of Toxic Materials Control, Michigan
Department of Natural Resources, June 1978.
14. Czuczwa, J. and Hites, R., "Environmental Fate of Combustion-Generated
Polychlon'nated Dioxins and Furans", Environmental Science Tech., 18(6):
444-450, 1984.
15. Czuczwa, J. and Hites, R., "Comments on Analysis of Polychlorodibenzo-P-
Dioxin (PCDD) and Polychlorodibenzofuran (PCDF) in Sediment Samples by
Michael L. Gross", in letter to Frank Snitz, USACOE, Detroit District
Office, March 1984.
16. Gross, M., Analysis of Polychlodibenzo-P-Dioxin (PCDD) and Polychlorodi-
benzofaran (PCDF) in Sediment Samples. Report to U.S.ArmyColdRegions
Research and Engineering Laboratory, TCDERGMI04, November 1984.
17. Personal Communication Between Larry Smith, Columbia National Fisheries
Research Laboratory, USFWS, Columbia, Missouri, and Larry Fink, Great
Lakes National Program Office, USEPA, Chicago, Illinois, December 1984.
18. Sylvester, S., "A Biological Survey on the Tittabawassee River, Staff
Report, Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Water Quality Division,
Biology Section, 1974.
19. USEPA Region V, USEPA Region V Guidelines for the Pollutional Classifica-
tion of Great Lakes Harbor Sediments, Chicago, Illinois, April, 1977.
20. Rossmann, R., et al., "The Impact of Pollutants on the Tittabawassee River,
Report to Great Lakes National Program Office, USEPA, Chicago, Illinois,
Grant Nos. R005691 and R005691-02, October 1982.
21. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Detroit District, Draft Environmental Impact
Statement: Upper Saginaw River Diked Disposal Facility of Crow Island
State Game Area Saginaw and Bay Counties, Michigan, November 1984.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Region 5, Library (PL-12J)
77 West Jackson Boulevard, 12th Roar
Chicago. IL 60604-3590
-------