300R95012
DEFORESTATION
 Technical Support Document

 International Training Workshop

 Principles of Environmental Enforcement
   r,
    >
        WWF
                     SEDESOL
                     SECRETARIA DE DESARROLLO SOC IAL
Ministry of Housing,
Spatial Planning,
and the Environment
(VROM) The Netherlands

-------
DEFORESTATION TECHNICAL SUPPORT PACKAGE

-------
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This document is one of five Technical Support Documents that have been developed to
accompany international training workshops on the Principles of Environmental
Enforcement.  They were developed as resource documents for government officials and
others who are motivated to try to reduce the adverse environmental impacts from
activities described in the case studies used for the course.  The five case study areas
include:
             o     Mining (Metallic ores and Minerals),
             o     Petroleum Refining and Petrochemicals,
             o     Residential and Industrial (Solid) Waste Disposal
             o     Tourism, and
             o     Deforestation.

The documents provide an overview of the environmental impacts, pollution prevention
and control opportunities, range of institutional mechanisms to control adverse impacts,
and an annotated bibliography of selected reference materials.  They do not address
institutional and  program development issues surrounding regulatory and enforcement
programs. These topics, as well as country specific program examples are developed in
the Proceedings of the International  Conferences on environmental compliance and
enforcement, UNEP  institution-building workshop materials and new capacity building
documents under development for the Fourth International Conference scheduled to be
held in April, 1996 in Thailand.

International workshops on the Principles of Environmental Enforcement provide an
opportunity for governmental and non-governmental officials to discover and apply the
definitions, frameworks and principles to develop a successful management approach,
compliance strategy and enforcement program for any environmental problem in any
cultural or legal setting and to explore negotiated resolution of enforcement problems.
The Principles of Environmental Enforcement  text and training was developed by the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in collaboration with the government of Poland
and in cooperation with the government of the Netherlands. It was adopted as a basis for
international exchange after having been successfully presented with this purpose in mind
at the Second International Conference on  Environmental Enforcement held in
Budapest, Hungary, September 1992.

This document was produced under a Cooperative Agreement between the World
Wildlife Fund and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in cooperation with the
Netherlands Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment, The United
Nations Environment Program IE, and SEDESOL the Mexican Social Development
Ministry.  The topic is one of five identified by an international Executive Planning
Committee for new case studies  and  stand-alone technical support materials to be used
in workshops on  the Principles of Environmental Enforcement launched  at the Third
International Conference on Environmental Enforcement held in Oaxaca, Mexico, April
25-28, 1994.  Partial funding was also provided by the United States Agency for
International Development.

-------
Ms. Marda Mayo of TLI Systems Inc., was principal author of the document, under the
Technical Direction of Ms. Cheryl Wasserman in U.S. EPA's Office of Enforcement and
Compliance Assurance. A special note of appreciation to the following individuals for
their contributions:
      Franklin Moore, U.S. EPA, Office of International Activities, expert on
             international forestry issues
      Gordon Knight, U.S. Department of Interior, Bureau of Land Management
      Ken Potts, John Cannell and Dov Weitman, U.S. EPA, Office of Water
      Louis Ferrand, Jr. Esq.
      Enrique Barrau,  USAID, Costa Rica
      Tom Trahan, Louisiana Dept. of Agriculture and Forestry
      Julie Lyke, International Forestry, U.S. Forest Service
      David  Brooks, U.S. Forest Service Research, Corvallis, Oregon
      Horst Wagner, World  Bank
      Mark Dillenbach, IUCN
      Robert Repetto and Aaron Zazueta, World Resources Institute
      Sam Auston, Virginia State Department of Forestry
      Jamie  Nations, Conservation International
      Ken Andrasko, Jr. USEPA, Climate Change Division
      Jamie  Ervin, Forest Stewardship Council
      Jay West, Save our Streams,  Isaak Walton League

for their  helpful comment and to Mr. William Eichbaum, International Vice President of
the World Wildlife Fund for his support.

Requests for  copies and comments on this document can be directed to:

Ms. Cheryl Wasserman
Associate Director for Policy Analysis
Office of Federal Activities
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance
401 M Street, MC  2251
Washington, D.C. 20460
FAX    1-202-260-0129
PHONE  1-202-260-4486
             or
Mr. Jo Gerardu
The  Netherlands Ministry of  Housing,
Spatial Planning, and the Environment
IPC  681
P.O. Box 30945
2500 GX DEN HAAG
The  Netherlands
FAX  31-70-339-1300
PHONE 31-70-339-2536

-------
                            TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTIONS

1.    INTRODUCTION
      1.1   Purpose and Overview of the Deforestation Support Package	1
      1.2   Deforestation and the Environment	2

2.    PROFILE OF THE FOREST SECTOR
      2.1   Overview:  International Deforestation  	2
      2.2   Forest Types   	2
            Boreal  Forests	   4
            Temperate Forests  	4
            Tropical Forests:  Moist, Dry, and Mangrove  	4
      2.3   Causes of Deforestation 	5

3.    PRINCIPAL DEFORESTATION-RELATED ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS
      3.1   Loss of Water Resources 	7
      3.2   Erosion of Top Soil and Loss of Nutrients  	7
      3.3   Climate Change  	9
      3.4   Decreased Biodiversity and Habitat Loss  	9

4.    PREVENTION/CONTROL OPTIONS
      4.1   Technological/Best Management Practices 	  10
      4.2   Performance-based  	  12
      4.3   Economic  	  12
      4.4   Voluntary  	  13

5.    PLANNING,   MONITORING,   ENFORCEMENT   AND   COMPLIANCE
      APPROACHES
      5.1   Planning  	  13
      5.2   Policy, Legislative and Regulatory Measures   	  14
      5.3   Training, Education and Local Participation	  14
      5.4   Monitoring and Inspection   	  15
      5.5   Enforcement and  Compliance  	  15

APPENDICES
      APPENDIX 1: Ministries and Organizations Concerned
                 with Forestry and Deforestation 	 19
      APPENDIX 2: Annotated Bibliography
                 A2.1   Books, Reports and Articles  	20
                 A2.2   Journals and Newsletters 	29
                 A2.3   Obtaining Selected Publications  	30
      APPENDIX 3:  Sample Laws, Criteria, Permits, Survey Forms,
                 Guidelines, Contracts, and Policies  	31

-------
           DEFORESTATION\FOREST RESOURCES SUPPORT PACKAGE
1.     INTRODUCTION

       Forests cover almost a third of the earth's land surface1, providing many environmental
benefits including a major role in the hydrologic cycle, soil conservation, prevention of climate
change,  and preservation of  biodiversity.  Forest resources  can provide  long-term national
economic benefits.   For example, at least 145 countries of the world are currently involved in
wood production. However, deforestation, particularly in the tropical moist forests, is proceeding
at a very rapid rate.  Reasons for deforestation include clearing of land for agriculture and
ranching, fuelwood gathering, unsustainable and inefficient logging practices, timber theft, and
the adverse effect of air pollution on forests.  The negative economic impacts of deforestation
are substantial,  and  include losses due to pollution and siltation of water used for  drinking,
agricultural, commercial and  industrial purposes; destruction of fisheries and aquatic habitat;
flooding; siltation of waterways and dams;  loss of top  soil and soil fertility;  climate change;
reduction or loss of non-timber harvests; and loss of recreational resources that attract tourists.
Many of these impacts can be avoided or controlled through the use of prevention and control
options,  and through planning, monitoring, enforcement and compliance.

1.1    Purpose and Overview of the Deforestation Support Package

       The purpose  of this support package is to provide  a general resource for governments
and others concerned about the environmental impacts of deforestation and to present alternatives
for preventing, controlling or minimizing these impacts. It provides a brief overview of global
deforestation,  forest types and characteristics, and  summarizes causes of deforestation.   The
document reviews some major prevention and  control options, along with enforcement and
compliance approaches that can be used to reduce or eliminate negative effects of deforestation.

       For purposes  of this document, deforestation is defined as the full-scale clearing of forest
lands.  Forest degradation refers  to forest damage or significant alteration (for example,  from
air pollution or partial clearing of forest trees and/or vegetation).  Sustainable use is defined as
meeting the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet
their own needs.

       This document is intended as an initial reference, providing summary-level  information
on deforestation prevention and minimization of adverse environmental effects. More detailed
sources of information are provided in the Appendices, including information on organizations
and ministries concerned with forestry and deforestation, an annotated bibliography, and sample
documents.

-------
1.2    Deforestation and the Environment

       Major environmental problems associated with deforestation include:

       •      Loss of water quality, including water used for drinking, commercial, agricultural
              and recreational purposes;

       •      Damage to fisheries and aquatic habitats from erosion and turbidity (dissolved and
              undissolved particles in water);

       •      Increased flooding during wet periods,  and loss of water normally stored and
              released during dry periods;

       •      Erosion of top soil and nutrient loss;

       •      Climate change, such as decreased local rainfall and desertification; and

       •      Decreased biodiversity, and loss of habitat for wildlife and endangered species.


2.     PROFILE OF THE FOREST SECTOR

       2.1    Overview:  International Deforestation

       An overview of global deforestation between 1965-1989 is provided in Figure 1. A more
detailed summary of forestry problems is provided in the  Nations of the Earth Report of 1992
which summarizes reports prepared by 47 of the countries  on environmental problem areas and
programs for  dealing  them.   Many of the  country reports discuss deforestation problems.
Countries with average annual deforestation  rates over  2% during the 1980s include (in Africa)
Algeria,  Burundi, Cote d'lvoire,  Guinea-Bissau,  Liberia, Malawi, Mauritania, Niger, Nigeria,
and Rwanda; (in Asia) Nepal, Sri Lanka and Thailand;  and (in Central & South America) Costa
Rica, Ecuador, El Salvador,  Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, Jamaica, and Nicaragua.2  A 1992
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) study reported that since the
early 1980s, the rate  of tropical deforestation had increased by 50%.3

  Generally, the area of temperate forests is  increasing as second growth forests replace the
primary forest (original, intact or virgin forest) cut earlier.   Many remaining tropical forests are
primary forest which still retain their biodiversity.  Differences between tropical and  temperate
forests are discussed in the following section.

       2.2    Forest Types

              Around the  world, there  are three main forest types and related ecosystems:
boreal, deciduous, and tropical.   Variation in the longevity and growth capabilities of trees and

-------
                Figure 2:   Change in Forests and Woodland:   1989
    Very rapid decrease (-1.1 percent or more)

!i \|  Rapid decrease (-0.6 to -1.0 percent)

ILJ  Moderate decrease (-0.1 to -0.5 percent)

',_!  No change (0.0 percent)

3  Increase (+0.1 percent or more)

;	|  No data available

Forest and woodland are decreasing most rapidh in
developing countries. Many countries have no net loss
of forest area—that is. the amount cleared is equal to
the amount replanted. Some countries have a net
increase.
Source:  Sheram, Kathenne, The Environmental Data Book.
(The World Bank, Washington, DC), 1993, p. 5.

-------
vegetation, soil characteristics, and biodiversity between and within these different forest types
all  affect the environmental  impacts of deforestation, and  selection of the most effective
management options.

       Boreal

       The  boreal forest is found  in northern latitudes and composed  almost completely by
coniferous trees -those bearing pine cones - such as firs, spruce, pines, and hemlock.

       Temperate

       Temperate forests include both coniferous and deciduous trees. About 39% of the land
area of temperate regions is covered by forests.4   About half of the world's total forest and
other wooded land is in the temperate-zone regions, with about 25% in the former USSR and
almost 20% in North America.  The World Conservation Monitoring Centre in England reports
that for temperate forests overall, forest area is increasing.5

       The temperate rainforest is a special category of forest,  such as the alerce forests of chile
and the redwood forests of California.  These coastal forests are noted for heavy fog and rain,
and are home to some  of the oldest trees on earth such as coast  redwoods which have a life
expectancy  of up to 2,000  years,  and  the giant sequoia which reaches full  growth at 3,000
years.6

       Deciduous forests lose their leaves every year during winter,  and include trees such as
oak, beech  and maple.  These  forests have been heavily impacted by man.  However, some
scientists think that some of these temperate forests have natural destruction/regeneration cycles
of about 250-450 years, with destruction caused by storms, fires caused by lightening, old age,
insects and disease.

       Tropical Forests

       Tropical dry  and moist forests are characterized by warm temperatures all year and moist
tropical  forests by abundant rainfall. Generally,  nutrients in tropical forests are stored in the
vegetation, unlike temperate forests where many nutrients are stored in the ground.  Often when
moist  tropical forests  are  cleared, the rains quickly  wash  away  nutrients in the  soil and
agriculture cannot be sustained very long. Tropical forests also contain tremendous biodiversity,
partly because of the favorable growing conditions, and also because unlike the  boreal and
deciduous forests, the tropical forests were not periodically destroyed by glaciers. Moist tropical
forests, at an estimated 7% of the world's land area, may contain over 50% of all named species
in the world biota.7  Tropical dry forests are concentrated in Africa, and are utilized heavily for
fuelwood gathering.  Deforestation of some tropical dry forests, such as those  in the Sahel, may
contribute to desertification.

-------
       Environmentally important mangrove forests, found in tropical coastal areas such as bays,
lagoons, and  river estuaries, are a special category of tropical forest.  Mangroves  grow in
shallow water and protect coastal areas during storms.  The bark and leaves of some species are
used for medicinal purposes.  The mangrove  forests also serve as nurseries for fish and shell-
fish.   In India, for instance, the mangroves shelter 105 species of fish, 229 crustacean species,
and 20 shellfish species, but during the last 25 years, almost 30% of the Indian mangrove forests
have been destroyed.8

2.3    Causes of Deforestation

       Major causes of deforestation include cutting for fuel, clearing of land for agriculture and
ranching, and  logging.  Causes of forest degradation include air pollution (such as acid  rain and
ozone), slash and burn agriculture, and non-sustainable partial clearing.  Timber theft accounts
for some deforestation and degradation.  Unnecessary deforestation also takes place in many
areas because lower than market prices are charged for government logging concessions, residual
timber is unnecessarily damaged during the logging operations, and inefficient processing wastes
lumber.

       2.3.1 Fragmentation

       A precursor of deforestation is fragmentation of forests, because fragmented forest units
are more accessible for clearing, timber theft, and fuelwood cutting,  and subject to decreased
biological diversity.  A study found 2/3 of  the tropical rainforests  were fragmented (under
400,000 hectares  and had road or water access).   South America had the least fragmented
rainforests, with 41 % of the rainforest remaining in large tracts, Central America has about 33%
remaining, Africa  has about  20%, and  forests in Southeast  Asia and  Oceania  are the most
fragmented with only 12% in large tracts.9

       2.3.2  Fuelwood

       About  80%  of wood used in developing countries  is for  fuelwood.10   (Even an
industrially developed country like Hungary reports that in 1989, 44% of the wood production
was for  fuelwood11).    Fuelwood  gathering  is often concentrated in tropical dry forests and
degraded forest areas.

       2.3.3 Clearing without Timber Utilization

       About 60%  of the  clearing of tropical moist forests is for agricultural settlement12, with
logging and other reasons (roads,  urbanization and fuelwood) accounting  for the rest.   As an
example of the scope of the clearing without timber utilization,  6000 separate fires were burning
on a single  day in 1988 in the Amazon  forest as a result of  slash and burn  deforestation.13
Other examples include Ghana and the Ivory Coast, where in  Ghana, with 80% deforestation,
the forest department estimates only 15% of the timber was harvested  before land clearance.
In the  Ivory Coast, estimated  loss from unutilized timber was  perhaps $5 billion.14

-------
       2.3.4  Air Pollution

       Air pollution is associated with degradation  of some European and North American
forests.  The syndrome is called "Waldsterben" or forest death.  For example, in 1982, 8% of
all West German trees exhibited damage, rising to about 52% by 1987.15  One report indicates
that half the trees  in the Alps are dying of Waldsterben.16  High elevation forests show the
earliest damage, including forests in the northeast and central US.  Scientist E.Schulze of West
Germany concluded that nitrogen compounds and sulfates (acid rain components from fossil fuel
burning) acidify the forest soil, freeing toxic aluminum to enter the tree roots instead of calcium
and magnesium which are crucial to tree nutrition.  The calcium/magnesium deficiency stunts
growth. Increased nitrogen depositing on tree foliage and into roots acts at the same time as a
fertilizer, stressing the trees. Thus weakened, the trees succumb to pests and adverse weather,
conditions which would not otherwise kill the trees.17

       2.3.5  Timber Harvesting

       Timber harvesting is another leading cause of deforestation.  Of the approximately  185 -
 190 countries currently recognized as independent, at least 145 are wood producers (the former
USSR, now 12 entities, is counted as 1).  The lead United Nations agency for forestry issues is
the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), which defines wood production (roundwood) as
"the quantities removed from forests and from trees outside the forest, including wood recovered
from natural, felling and logging losses...  Commodities included are sawlogs and veneer logs,
pulpwood,  other industrial roundwood ... and fuelwood."   As  of 1992, using this definition,
wood  production by region  was:  Africa - 15%, North and Central America - 22%, South
America  -  10%, Asia - 32%,  Europe - 10%, Oceania - 1%, and the  former USSR (CIS) -
10 %.18

       2.3.6  Inefficient Timber Processing and  Revenue Practices

       Inefficient timber processing and revenue practices cause unnecessary deforestation.  A
World Bank study indicated that these problems are common to many countries.  For example,
a World Bank study cited a situation in Cameroon where in 1987 the total of all forest revenues
collected from forest fees was only  between 2-4% of the FOB  (price of timber including
transportation to the ship)  price of export logs,  and  in Ghana where 1988 forest revenues
collected from all forest fees was only about  1/6 the amount that should have been realized.19
3.     PRINCIPAL DEFORESTATION-RELATED ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS

       Loss of water resources, erosion of top soil, climate change, and decreased biodiversity
are major environmental problems associated with deforestation, as summarized in Table 1, and
described, with examples, in the following section.

-------
3.1    Loss of Water Resources

       Water resources affected by deforestation include drinking water, fisheries and aquatic
habitats, flood/drought controls, waterways and dams affected by siltation, less appealing water-
related recreation, and damage to crops and irrigation systems from erosion and turbidity.

       Turbidity (dissolved and undissolved particles  in water) is one of the problems caused
by deforestation. As indicated in Table 1, turbidity can impair the use of water for a variety of
purposes.  For example, turbidity interferes with treatment of drinking water, as illustrated in
Washington,  DC recently when high turbidity levels in the municipal drinking water supplies
resulted in a recommendation that residents boil their  water during a ten day period.   One of
the ways turbidity can contribute to water pollution is  that many chemical constituents, such as
pesticides, are sorbed onto fine particles in the water.  Turbidity can damage or even eliminate
fish and aquatic habitat.20  High turbidity levels from deforestation in the Pacific Northwest of
the U.S. are reported to be one of the causes of reduced salmon harvests.

       Examples of the extent of damage to waterways and dams include a reduction by half in
the useful life of the dams on Himalayan rivers and a rate of erosion in the watershed area of
the Himalayan rivers five times greater than the rate over the past  40 million years.   The
estimated 50 year  life  of the Tarbela dam in Pakistan was  reduced to under  20 years by
sedimentation from deforestation, cultivation of steep slopes, and overgrazing.  Another example
of the costs includes flood damage in India from deforestation in the Himalayas costing about
$210 million annually in emergency assistance.21

3.2    Erosion of Top Soil and Loss of Nutrients

       Erosion  of  top  soil from deforestation  affects many countries.   Examples  include
Ethiopia,  Nepal, and Haiti; half of Ethiopia's land area was affected by erosion  in the 1980s.
In the United States, billions of dollars have been spent by the US Soil Conservation Service to
prevent loss of top soil in areas which were converted to agricultural use from forests.  Tropical
forest soils are particularly vulnerable to nutrient loss.  Because forests converted to pastures
quickly lose fertility and productivity, and therefore can carry few cattle, the per hectare revenue
from Brazil nuts and wild rubber from the same land is estimated to be four times greater than
the revenue from cattle  ranching  in the Brazilian state  of Acre. Similarly,  in a 1987 evaluation
of a one hectare forest  area near Iquitos, Peru, total net revenues from sustainable harvesting
of non-wood forest products (using market prices in Iquitos) were 66% greater than those from
forest conversion.22

-------
                                   Table 1
           Major Environmental Problems Caused by Deforestation
                    and Inappropriate Forestry Practices
Loss of Water
Resources
  Drinking Water
  Destruction of
  Fisheries and
  Aquatic Habitat

  Flooding

  Siltation of
  Waterways, Dams
  Decreased
  Recreation
  Crop Damage
Erosion of Top Soil
& Nutrient Loss
Climate Change
Decreased
Biodiversity
Uncontrolled runoff carries soil and debris into surface
water,  reducing water quality for drinking,  fisheries and
aquatic habitat, and flood prevention.  Navigable
waterways and dams are silted up

Increased  turbidity reduces effectiveness  of chlorination,
increases adsorption of toxic  materials,  provides food for
microbes which can  then multiply in  the water distribution
system, interferes with ion exchange and carbon adsorption
processes and with lab analysis of water quality

Siltation kills fish, spawning areas and vegetation
needed by fish to reproduce and  survive
Uncontrolled runoff increases flooding

Turbidity & suspended solids deposit in navigable
waterways (requiring dredging) and dam impoundments
(shortening the useful life of the dam)

Turbid waters are dangerous for swimming and diving
because the depth and submerged hazards cannot be seen.
Also, users prefer clear water and clean beaches for aesthetic
reasons.

Turbidity damages irrigation systems and equipment,
films form on plant leaves, reducing growth and market
value, crusts form on soil surfaces inhibiting water absorption,
young plant growth and soil aeration.

Removal of the trees, ground cover, and leaf litter
allows uncontrolled runoff and nutrient leaching during rains,
making reforestation and farming difficult

Large deforested areas can cause undesirable climate change,
such  as decreased rainfall,  or  can contribute to  global
warming

Loss  of sustainable forest is accompanied by loss of
habitat, species and  genetic  diversity,  and  loss  of non-
timber harvests

-------
3.3    Climate Change

       Climate  change  (also  known  as  global  warming  or  global  change)  includes
anthropogenically  produced climatic and ecological problems such as recent apparent climatic
temperature shifts and precipitation regimes in some areas, sea level rise, stratospheric ozone
depletion, atmospheric  pollution and forest decline.   "Greenhouse gasses", including carbon
dioxide,  trap heat in the earth's atmosphere,  creating a  warming,  or greenhouse effect.
Forested areas serve as  "sinks" or reservoirs of carbon because carbon is part of tree and plant
tissue.  Thus, deforestation increases the greenhouse effect, and reforestation reduces it.  Over
90% of the carbon lost  from deforestation is released to the atmosphere as carbon dioxide, and
carbon dioxide is a long-lasting gas, with an average residence time in the atmosphere of 100
years.   Release of the  carbon dioxide  from deforestation accounts  for an estimated 25%  of
emissions from combustion of fossil fuels.23

       Estimates of  the  global  warming  effect  of the  six greenhouse  gasses  released by
deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon in 1990 indicated that  the emissions represent 7-8  times
the annual carbon  release from Brazil's use of fossil fuels.  A study by the Lawrence Berkeley
Lab indicated that ending deforestation in Brazil would cut greenhouse emissions as much as
making all the cars in the world three times more fuel efficient.24

3.4    Decreased  Biodiversity and  Habitat Loss

       When forest is destroyed, fragmented or degraded, biodiversity and habitat for migratory
birds and for many types of endangered species is lost. Retaining the biodiversity of the forested
areas is retaining a form of capital, until more research can establish the relative importance of
various plant and animal species.  The value  of biodiversity in the  medical area alone is
illustrated by several examples.  According to the World Health Organization, as much as 80%
of the world's population relies for primary health care at least partially on traditional medicine.
Much traditional medicine relies on forest plants.  The local economic value of medicinal forest
products was studied in  Belize. Two scientists evaluated the sustainable harvest from two forest
plots of all the medicinal plants that could be sold to local herb healers and pharmacists.  On a
sustainable basis (30 year harvesting  rotation), the herb harvest was worth $294  and $1,346 per
acre on the two plots.  In comparison, clearing rain forests for agriculture was worth $117 per
acre in Guatemala, and  $137 in Brazil.25 Pharmaceutical use  of forest-based drugs includes the
rosy periwinkle from tropical forests in Madagascar, used  to treat  childhood leukemia and
Hodgkin's disease, and  the yew bark from temperate forests used to treat ovarian cancer.  It is
estimated  that less than  1%  of tropical plants have been screened for medical uses.26

4.            PREVENTION/CONTROL OPTIONS

       Around the world,  governments have used a variety of prevention/control options  to
prevent environmental damage from deforestation as well as to retain existing forests and forest

-------
 resources, to prevent unnecessary deforestation, and encourage reforestation where appropriate.
Many of these  control options are technological (e.g., use of best management practices to
control erosion).  However, many control options, such as bans on logging, limits on forest
destruction or subsidies, can also be viewed as management options. We discuss each of these
different types of options in this section. A summary of some major options is included in Table
2, with examples provided in the following section.
              TABLE 2:  SELECTED PREVENTION/CONTROL OPTIONS
                 TECHNOLOGICAL/BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
         Establish Best Management Practices (BMP) for forestry operations, institute a
          full or partial logging ban, limit access to forests, control major air pollution
                                       affecting trees
                                PERFORMANCE-BASED
         Set a Performance Goal (e.g. no net forest destruction, x% increase in forested
              area, limit turbidity  levels from forestry runoff into surface waters)
                                       ECONOMIC
            Maximize the market for non-wood products, improve forest pricing and
         concessions policies, change laws providing inadvertent economic incentives for
                        deforestation, develop social forestry programs
                                      VOLUNTARY
         Provide technical assistance, set up a timber certification program, use awards
                                         programs
4.1    Technological/Best Management Practices

       Best Management Practices  (BMP)  include  water pollution  control  measures  in
       widespread use in forestry operations throughout the world.  These management practices
       involve  a  variety of  locally appropriate  erosion control measures which help  prevent
       pollution in surface waters resulting from forestry activities and deforestation.  In the
       United States, recent  surveys indicate forestry activities contribute approximately 3-9%
       of all non-point source  pollution of  water bodies.27  Best Management Practices are
       important  because they  prevent or minimize environmental problems associated with
       forestry activity  such  as turbidity,  nutrient  transport,  and  runoff  of  herbicides,
       insecticides  and fungicides into surface waters affecting drinking water, fisheries and
                                           10

-------
aquatic habitats, flooding, siltation of dams and irrigation systems, and crop damage from
siltation on leaves from irrigation water.

Many  different specific  control  technologies, or  Best Management Practices,  are
available, including preharvest planning to minimize runoff and erosion from roads and
harvest areas into  streams, use of streamside buffer or management areas (areas along
surface waters where the vegetative cover is left) to reduce runoff from upslope activities
and trap sediments, use of road construction, maintenance, and post-harvest re vegetation
techniques that minimize erosion, and use of effective erosion control devices, as locally
appropriate, such as sediment control devices like silt fences,  riprap, and sediment traps
or check dams.  Other control technologies include timber harvesting techniques  that
minimize erosion like cable yarding and aerial harvesting, particularly for dispersed high
value timber.  Fire management is important in preventing erosion, particularly on steep
slopes near streams.   Careful management of chemicals used  in forestry is important in
reducing environmental damage.  Aerial applications of pesticides may pose the greatest
risk to water quality, but streamside buffer zones have been found to minimize the effects
of pesticide application.  Studies have shown prompt revegetation of disturbed areas
effectively reduces erosion.  Detailed information on effectiveness,  applicability,  and
costs  of different Best Management Practices is contained in  many of the references in
Appendix 2, the Water Resources and Forestry section of the Bibliography.

An indication of the extent to which different Best Management Practices are used in the
U.S.  is provided in a 1993  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency  study.  The study
reported  that over 80%  of the states  had state BMP regulations or  manuals.  Most state
BMPs addressed preharvest planning  (over a third), road construction and maintenance
(all),  timber harvesting, streamside buffer or management  zones (almost  60%),  site
preparation, chemical management (over 40%), revegetation (almost  70%), prescribed
burning,  and drainage structures  in  some.28   A recent summary by USEPA of the
effectiveness of various forestry management measures indicates revegetation, roads, and
streamside buffer  or  management zones offer some of the  greatest opportunities for
pollution reduction.

Logging  Bans/Protected Areas:   The establishment of various categories of  protected
forest areas has been  used effectively by many countries to retain  important benefits of
forests and prevent environmental damage  from deforestation. In some countries, the
only remaining forests  are  those with protected  status.  Protected  forest  areas  have
existed since the  4th  century BC in India,  and hunting reserves existed  in Europe for
hundreds of years.  Most protected areas were established in the late 19th century.  The
International  Union  for the  Conservation  of  Nature has developed a  standard
classification system of ten  types of protected areas. Using this criteria,   169  countries
have protected  sites covering over 5% of the world's land area.  Of this amount, about
9% is in subtropical/temperate  rainforests/woodlands,  about 5% in tropical  humid
forests,  4.7%  in  tropical  dry forests/woodlands,  4.7% in  evergreen sclerophyllous
forests, about 3%  in temperate broad-leaf forests, and about 2.9% in temperate needle-

                                     11

-------
       leaf forests/woodlands.29   Because of the range of different forest types protected,
       preservation of biodiversity is a major benefit.

       A different type of ban/protected area was established by the government of Thailand.
       A full commercial logging ban on government forests was imposed after uncontrolled
       runoff  from  rains caused  landslides,  and destroyed the homes  of  40,000  people.
       However,  between 1985  and 1988, forest cover fell from 29% to  19%.30 A logging ban
       was also imposed in Ecuador to reduce deforestation.

       Another example of a national  timber ban is one imposed by the  Kingdom of Bhutan in
       the Himalayas. In 1974,  the government stipulated that 60% of the country would remain
       under permanent forest  cover.  A tree planting program was initiated to increase  the
       forest area,  and  the  government has started giving villages their own forest  plots to
       manage.31

       Other types of logging bans which have been used include bans on steep slopes (e.g. over
       30% grade), bans on logging near surface waters (streamside buffer areas), and logging
       bans in government reserves  (extractive  reserves).  Examples  of such  bans include
       Brazil's new system of nine extractive reserves where logging is prohibited, but activities
       such as rubber harvesting, shellfish gathering and fishing, and  coconut harvesting  are
       permitted.32   A critical  component of such programs balancing  the extraction of non-
       wood products with the  maintenance of biodiversity, and to avoid over-harvesting.

4.2    Performance-Based Options

       Performance-based options leave the choice of management options up to the regulated
group or individual but require  measurement and  monitoring methods to determine whether the
performance standard has been met.  An example  of a performance-based goal or standard is the
surface water turbidity standard used by the United States and Canada.   A copy of the standard
for the province of British Columbia,  Canada is  included in Appendix 3.

4.3    Economic Options

       Economic  options use market forces to encourage activities reducing deforestation and/or
forestry activities  causing environmental problems. Such options include tax policies that reduce
assessments for "conservation land", government  assistance for reforestation, tax  incentives  and
government subsidies for turbidity control and other Best Management Practices,  and extending
the life of timber concessions  to provide an incentive  for  protection and  maintenance of the
reforested  area until the new  growth is  well established.  Other economic options include
changing laws inadvertently causing deforestation, provision of secure land tenure for forest
residents protecting the forest, the development of community forestry programs, and programs
for timber  theft prevention.
                                           12

-------
       An example of an economic option is the use establishment of "conservation land" areas
in Lincoln, Massachusetts, USA.   Tax  rates are set  at a  lower level  for forest lands  of
conservation interest to the town.  Another example of an economic option is the timber theft
program established by the State of Louisiana, USA which helps private landowners protect their
forest lands against timber  theft (see Appendix 3 for more information on  this program).

       Brazil changed a policy which provided economic incentives for conversion of forests to
ranches  in Amazonia.  The changes involved suspending the economic  incentives for new
livestock ranches in Amazonian forests.33

       Another example of an economic option is changing the forest pricing methods. Options
include raising  forest sale  fees  to  market levels, simplifying  overly  complex  procedures,
adjusting for inflation, increasing collection rates, using market mechanisms (e.g. competitive
bids) for concession  allocation, and reducing wasteful  logging  through payment per tree  or
volume of trees felled (rather than removed).  The Grut, Gray and Egli report by the World
Bank on Forest Pricing contains detailed recommendations in each one of these areas.

       Community forestry programs and land titling programs work with local populations and
their economic interests to increase forest protection. For example, the Awa reserve was created
in 1982 in Equador to protect 1700 hectares of forest from deforestation by  developing a multi-
faceted  program  including  land titling for local residents, inventorying forest resources and
developing a program for effective forest use.34  In Nepal,  an effort  to combat  deforestation
involved establishment  of  community  nurseries and distribution of tree  seedings free or  at
minimal  cost, and promotion of agroforestry.35

4.4    Voluntary Options

       Voluntary approaches are widely used in the forestry area to encourage compliance with
environmental goals.   Voluntary options  include education  and  technical assistance,  timber
certification programs, and  awards programs. Examples  include many of the Best Management
Practice programs in the US which are voluntary, and depend heavily on education and technical
assistance efforts by forestry staff.  For instance, a study of the effectiveness of U.S. State
programs directed at  private landowners indicated technical  assistance programs  were judged
most effective36.
5.     PLANNING, MONITORING, ENFORCEMENT AND COMPLIANCE
       APPROACHES

5.1    Planning

       Planning is used in many countries, from the national to local  levels, to maximize the
benefit  from  forest resources,  and  minimize  the environmental  damage  resulting  from
deforestation and forestry activities.  Typical plans relating  to deforestation include land use


                                           13

-------
planning, natural resource planning, park and recreational planning, and harvest planning,
with special attention focused on sensitive areas.  For example, Madagascar is currently
undertaking a major national planning effort to preserve the remaining 20% of its forested
areas and is studying the potential of nature tourism in these areas.37  At a local level, the
State of California precludes any person from conducting timber operations unless a timber
harvesting plan, prepared by a registered professional forester, has been approved by the
Director of Forestry. The plan must be based on site-specific characteristics including
vegetation type, topography, and stream characteristics/8

5.2    Policy, Legislative and Regulatory Measures

       A wide variety of policy statements, and legislative and regulatory measures have
been established to protect  forests and prevent pollution. Two reference volumes allow
country-by-country analysis,  lUCN's Protected Areas of the World:  A Review of National
Systems, and FAO's Forest  Legislation in Selected African Countries.  A review of legislation
specifically pertaining to Biodiversity is contained in the World Conservation Monitoring
Centre's Global Diversity.  Legislation on water quality and climate change is often available
through the offices  responsible for those programs. Costa Rica's recent forest policy,
referenced in Appendix 3, is an  example of a  coordinated national effort, developed through
a cooperative process by the government and private forestry sector representatives.  The
State of Virginia's recent Forest Water Quality Law is included in the  same Appendix as  an
example of a legislative measure designed to prevent water resource damage from forestry
activities.

5.3    Training, Education and Local Participation

       Training and education of stakeholders helps people understand how to prevent and
reduce adverse environmental effects associated with deforestation and forestry activities,
and  take appropriate action when possible.  It also has been particularly important in
promoting community based programs which seek to substitute other economic uses of forest
resources and new forestry practices for forest clearing.

       Where local populations live in or near forests, local participation has been found  to
be essential to the successful prevention of deforestation. Many case studies of local
participation are included in Saving the Tropical Forests, and in People and Parks: Linking
Protected Area Management with Local Communities.  The first study includes a number of
positive approaches to tropical forest conservation, and the second  is a analytical look at  the
results of a number of projects.  Another report, Developing a Partnership of Indigenous
Peoples, Conservationists, and Land Use Planners in Latin America, includes case studies of
some successful forest preservation projects developed with indigenous peoples.

       An example of a different type of community participation is the local volunteer
monitoring of water quality  by organizations like the Izaak Walton League of America in
their Save Our Streams program. Started in 1969, the program has grown to several


                                           14

-------
thousand active projects across the United States.39 Local groups "adopt" a stream of their
choice and monitor it for a year or more.  Timber operations are one of the non-point
sources whose effects on surface waters the local groups are trained to monitor.  Local
citizens are trained in conducting biological and/or chemical testing, and reporting stream
abuses, and are given information on improving water quality through measures such as Best
Management Practices  for forestry activities. A Stream Quality Survey form, used for
monitoring of macroinvertebrates  sensitive to turbidity and  other forms of pollution, is
included in Appendix 3.

5.4    Monitoring and  Inspection

       Monitoring compliance is essential to a effective enforcement program.   Forestry
monitoring may include evaluation of the overall extent of deforestation or forest
degradation, and/or examination of specific environmental problems caused by deforestation
such as erosion, and effects on surface water.  Major monitoring tools in forestry include on-
site inspections by staff, citizen monitoring and complaints,  aircraft overflights,  and use of
satellite data.  Despite the difficulty of monitoring theft and illegal logging in forest reserves,
many countries and indigenous populations are mounting effective  monitoring and
surveillance programs.  Countries such as Guyana have enlisted the support of their defense
forces and police  in surveillance of sensitive forest reserves threatened by theft and
encroachment, (described in the Proceedings of the Third International Conference on
Environmental Enforcement, Oaxaca, Mexico, April 25-18,  1994.)  Indigenous tribes in
Panama (Cuna) and Ecuador (Awa) have used coordinated tribal action to monitor and
protect designated forest reserves.

5.5    Enforcement and Compliance

       This Document  is intended to accompany the Principles of Environmental
Enforcement Text, U.S. EPA, which describes the basic elements and approaches for
establishing effective compliance strategies and enforcement programs. As a supplement to
international efforts to  advance effective environmental compliance and enforcement
programs, the readers are referred as well to the UNEP IE training manual on Institution
Building for Industrial Compliance and Proceedings of the series of International
Conferences on Environmental Compliance and Enforcement for further discussion.

       Many formal and informal  enforcement/compliance mechanisms are used  to prevent
deforestation and environmental problems from forestry activities empowering citizens and
governments to impose legal consequences to encourage and compel compliance. These
approaches include negotiation, warnings, Stop Work Orders, Notices of Violation, fines,
arrests, and court action. An example of a successful enforcement program is on the Bururi
and Rumonge forest preservation  and reforestation projects in Burundi, where increased
enforcement was reported to be critical in reducing illegal fuelwood gathering and
logging.40   Samples of  legislation  and other documents supporting  enforcement actions are
included in Appendix 3.


                                          15

-------
                                   REFERENCES
1. Sheram, Katherine, The Environmental Data Book. The World Bank, Washington DC  1993
p. 4

2.  Narendra  Sharma, ed.,  Managing  the World's Forests: Looking  for  Balance  Between
Conservation and Development. Kendall/Hunt Publishing Co., Dubuque, Iowa, p. 541-543.

3.  FAO,  Forest Resources of the Temperate Zones. Vol. II, FAO, Rome, Italy, p.  127.

4.  FAO,  Forest Resources of the Temperate Zones.. Vol. 1, FAO, Rome, Italy, p. 28.

5. World  Conservation Monitoring Centre, Global Biodiversity. Chapman  & Hall,  London,
England, 1992., p. xv.

6. Jonas, Gerald, North American  Trees. The Reader's Digest Association, Inc. Pleasantville,
NY, 1993, p. 12.

7. The World Bank, The Forest Sector. The World Bank, Washington, DC,  1991, p.  27.

8.  Jagtap, R., V. Chavan and A. Untawale,  "Mangrove Ecosystems of India: A Need for
Protection, Ambia. June 1993, p. 252-3.

9. McCloskey, Michael, "Note on the Fragmentation of Primary Rainforest", Ambia. June 1993,
p. 249-250.

10. The World Bank, The Forest Sector. The World Bank, Washington, DC, 1991, p. 10.

11. FAO,  The Forest Resources of the Temperate Zones. Vol. II, FAO, Rome, Italy, p.  127.

12. The World Bank, The Forest Sector. The World Bank, Washington, DC, p. 10.

13. Sting  and  Jean-Pierre Dutilleux, Jungle Stories: The Fight for the  Amazon.  Barrie &
Jenkins, London, England, p. 31.

14. Robert Repetto,  "Deforestation in the Tropics", Scientific American. April 1990,  p. 37.

15. Raloff, Janet,  "Where Acids Reign", Science News. July 22, 1989, p.  56.

16. Lean,  Geoffrey, ed., World Wildlife Fund Atlas of the Environment.  Prentice Hall Press,
New York, NY 1990, p. 77.

17. Janet Raloff, "Where Acids Reign", Science News. July 22, 1989, p. 56-58.

18. FAO,  Forest Products: Yearbook 1991. FAO, Rome, Italy, 1992,  p. x, 2-3.

                                         16

-------
                                    REFERENCES
 19. Mikael Grut, John Gray and  Nicolas Egli, Forest Pricing and Concession Policies. The
 World Bank,  Washington, DC, 1991, p. 7.

 20. U.S. Environmental  Protection  Agency, Region  10, and the University of Washington,
 Monitoring Guidelines to Evaluate  Effects  of Forestry Activities on  Streams  in the Pacific
 Northwest and Alaska. USEPA Water Division, Region 10, Seattle, WA, May, 1991, p. 98.

 21. J.S. Spears, "Deforestation Issues in  Developing  Countries,  the Case for an Accelerated
 Investment Program", Commonwealth Forestry Review 64., p. 313.

 22. Robert Repetto, "Deforestation in the  Tropics",  Scientific  American. April 1990, p. 37.

 23. Kenneth Asdrasko and the FAO, Climate Change and Global Forests: Current Knowledge
 of Potential Effects. Adaptation and Mitigation Options. Draft, FAO, Rome, Italy, October 1990,
 p. 1,3,9.

 24. W. Makundi,  J.  Sathaye and P.M.  Fearnside, Carbon Emissions and  Sequestration in
 Forests: Case Studies  from Seven Developing Countries.. Vol. 2, Greenhouse Gas Emissions
 from  Deforestation in the Brazilian  Amazon", Lawrence Berkeley Lab, U.S. Environmental
 Protection Agency, U.S.  Department of Energy,  Washington,  D.C.,  August 1992.

 25. Catherine Dold, "Tropical Forests Found More  Valuable for Medicine  than Other Uses",
 New York Times.  April 28, 1992, p. C4.

 26. Kenton Miller and Laura Tangley, Trees of Life:  Saving  Tropical Forests and Their
 Biological Wealth.  Beacon Press, Boston,  MA, 1991, p.  xviii.

 27. U.S. Environmental  Protection Agency, guidance  Specifying Management Measures  for
 Sources of Nonpoint  Pollution  in Coastal  Waters.. "Management  Measures for Forestry",
 USEPA, Office of  Water, Washington, DC, January 1993, p. 3-3.

 28. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency  and Tetra Tech, Inc. Summary  of Currrent State
 Nonpoint Source Control Practices  for Forestry. USEPA  Office of Wetlands, Oceans and
Watersheds, August 1993, p. 2-3.

29. World  Conservation  Monitoring Centre with IUCN, UNEP, WWF  and WRI,  Global
Biodiversity. Chapman &  Hall, London, England, 1992, p. 447, 452.

 30. Robert Repetto, "Deforestation in the Tropics",  Scientific American. April 1990, p. 42.

31. Lean, Geoffrey, World Wildlife Fund Atlas of the Environment. Prentice Hall Press, N.Y.,
NY, 1990, p.  80.

                                          17

-------
                                   REFERENCES
32.Manuel Perez, Jeffrey Sayer, Susanna Jehoram, El Extractivismo en America Latina. IUCN,
Gland, Switzerland, 1993, p. 63.

33. Robert Repetto, "Deforestation in the Tropics",  Scientific American,  April 1990, p. 39.

34. Judith Gradwohl and Russell Greenberg, Saving the Tropical Forests, Earthscan Publications
Ltd., London, England, 1988, p. 83-85.

35. Hans Gregersen, Sydney Draper, Dieter Elz, Ed., People and Trees: The Role of Social
Forestry in Sustainable Development, The World Bank, Washington, DC, 1989, p.  134.

36. Antony  Cheng and Paul Ellefson, State Programs Directed  at the  Forestry Practices of
Private Forest Landowners: Program Administrators' Assessment of Effectiveness, Minnesota
Agricultural  Experiment Station, University of Minnesota, S. Paul, MN,  1993, p. 31.

37. Conservation International, The Rain Forest Imperative: A Ten Year Strategy to Save
Earth's Most Threatened Ecosystems, Conservation International, Washington, DC,  1990, p. 9.

38. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and Tetra Tech, Inc., Summary of Current State
Nonpoint Source Control  Practices  for Forestry, USEPA  Office of Wetlands, Oceans and
Watersheds,  August 1993., p.  19.

39. Izaak Walton League of America, Save Our Streams, Cover Letter to Volunteer Package,
Izaak Walton League of America,  Arlington, VA, 1994.

40. Michael Wells and Katrina Brandon, People and Parks: Linking Protected Area Management
with Local Communities. The World Bank, WWF and USAID,  Washington, DC, 1992, p. 66-
69.
                                          18

-------
   APPENDIX 1: MINISTRIES AND ORGANIZATIONS CONCERNED
                 WITH FORESTRY AND DEFORESTATION
Directory  of Principal Governmental Bodies Dealing with  the Environment. United Nations
Environment Program, Nairobi, 1990.

       Compiled by the Environmental Law and Institutions  Unit of UNEP,  the Directory
provides the name of the Ministry or Department dealing with environmental issues, along with
address, phone number and fax.

Worldwide Government Directory, Belmont Publications, Bethesda, MD. 1993.

       Country by country  listing of the structure and personnel of 193 governments, including
the heads  of state, ministries, departments, and legislative and judicial entities.

Natural Resources Directory: Latin America and the Caribbean, Partners of the Americas with
the Tinker Foundation, 1988.

       Country by country listing of non-government organizations with contacts and description,
and listing of government ministries concerned with natural  resources.

Directory of Non-Governmental Environment and Development Organizations in OECD Member
Countries. OECD, Paris, France,  1992.

       Listing ofNGOs by country including contacts and activities in the areas of development,
environment, and environmental education.

World Directory of Environmental Organizations: A Handbook of National and International
Organizations and Programs-Governmental and Non-Governmental-Concerned with Protecting
the Earth's Resources. T. Trzyna and R. Childers, ed., California Institute of Public Affairs,
Sacramento, CA 1992.

       National agencies and forestry associations are listed by country in Part 7. International
       forestry organizations are listed  on pages 25-26.
                                         19

-------
               APPENDIX 2:  ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY

A2.1   BOOKS, REPORTS, AND ARTICLES


GENERAL

Andrasko, K., "Global warming  and forests:  an overview  of current knowledge",  Unasylva,
Vol. 41, FAO, Rome, Italy, 1990/4.

       Summary of current knowledge about global warming, its potential effects on forests, and
       possible measures within the forestry sector to mitigate global warming.

Andrasko, Kenneth and the FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations),
Climate Change and Global Forests: Current Knowledge of Potential Effects.  Adaptation and
Mitigation Options, Draft, FAO,  Rome, Italy, October 1990.

       A comprehensive review  of the scientific literature on climate  change due  to  the
       greenhouse effect and the potential effect on forests.  Also discusses the role afforests
       and forestry in  reducing and contributing to greenhouse gasses.

Commonwealth Secretariat,  Sustainable  Development:  An Imperative   for  Environmental
Protection, Economic Affairs Division, Commonwealth Secretariat, London, England, August
1991.

       Conclusions of an appointed Commonwealth group of experts  regarding sustainable
       development for the  Commonwealth countries.  Chapter 3 covers forests;  Chapter 4
       climate change.

Dixon,  Robert and  Kenneth  Andrasko,  "Integrated  Systems:  Assessment of  Promising
Alternative Land-Use  Practices to  Enhance Carbon Conservation and  Sequestration",  IPCC
(Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) Workshop, Canberra, Australia, Jan.  1992.

       Analysis of technical options from 94 nations to sequester and  conserve carbon on
       marginal lands,  including  revegetation practices.

Dixon, et al, "Carbon Pools and Flux of Global Forest Ecosystems", Science, vol. 263, January
14, 1994.

       Summary and analysis of the role of forest systems in carbon sequestration.  Indicates
       over two-thirds of the carbon in forest ecosystems is contained in  soils and  associated
       peat deposits.

                                         20

-------
Dold, Catherine,  "Tropical Forests Found More Valuable for Medicine than Other Uses", New
York Times. April 28, 1992.

       A study of two secondary growth hardwood forest plots in Belize showing the value of all
       the medicinal plants  that  could be sustainabfy  harvested  and sold to local herb
       pharmacists and healers exceeded the estimated value of other land uses, including timber
       harvesting.

Federal Law Enforcement Training Center, Basic Law  Enforcement for Land  Management
Agencies. Syllabus. FLETC,  April 1991.

       200+ page  volume describing each segment of the  course, including  performance
       objectives  and method of evaluation.

FAO (Food and Agricultural  Organization of the United  Nations), Forest products:  Yearbook
1991. FAO, Rome, Italy, 1992.

       Annual statistical yearbook of global and country-specific forest products.

FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations), Some medicinal  Forest Plants
of Africa and Latin America.  FAO Forestry Dept., Rome, Italy, 1986.

       Information on 40 species of trees and shrubs with a  variety  of traditional  and
       pharmaceutical uses, compiled in collaboration with nine institutions in Africa and Latin
       America.

FAO and the UN Economic Commission for Europe, The Forest  Resources of the Temperate
Zones. Main findings of the  UN-ECE/FAO 1990 Forest Resource Assessment,  and Vol. II,
Benefits and Functions of the  Forest.

       Study includes analyses of a range of forest uses.

Gradwohl,  Judith  and Russell Greenberg, Saving the Tropical Forests. Earthscan Publications
Ltd., London, England, 1988.

       Case studies including forest reserves, natural forest management,  and tropical forest
       restoration.

Gillis,  M.  Forest Incentive Policies. Duke University, N.C., 1991.
                                          21

-------
Grut, Mikael, John Gray and Nicolas Egli, Forest Pricing and Concession Policies. World Bank,
Washington, D.C.,  1991.

       Issues,  options, and recommendations on forest pricing and concession policies in West
       and Central Africa

Henly, Russell,  and  Paul  Ellefson,  State Forest Practice  Regulation  in  the United  States:
Administration. Cost and Accomplishments. University  of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota.

       Detailed description of state forest practice regulation in the U. S..   Public sector costs
       of regulation were estimated at $10 million for 1984; private sector compliance costs at
       $121 million.

International  Tropical Timber  Organization  (ITTO),  ITTO  guidelines for the  Sustainable
Management of Natural Tropical Forests. ITTO, Yokohama, Japan, December 1990.

       Guidelines for "best practice" for sustainable management of natural forests developed
       by an international 13-member panel of experts,  and endorsed by the eight Council
       session in 1990.

IUCN  (International Union for the Conservation of Nature), Caring for the Earth: A Strategy
for Sustainable Living. IUCN, UNEP,  WWF,  Gland, Switzerland,  October 1991.

       Priority action recommendations for country management afforests include preparation
       of an inventory of a forest inventory, protection of areas of natural forest, sustainable use
       of modified forests,  establishment of plantations  for sustainable  harvesting, and
       involvement of local communities in forest management.

IUCN  (International Union for the Conservation of Nature), Conserving Biological Diversity in
Managed Tropical Forests.  J. Blockhus, M. Dillenbeck, J. Sayer, and P. Wegge, Ed.,  IUCN,
Gland, Switzerland, 1992.

       A study to determine  whether member  countries of the International Tropical  Timber
       Organization (ITTO) have a legal and administrative basis for managing their production
       forests  to contribute to biological diversity  conservation.

IUCN, El Extractivismo en America Latina, IUCN, Gland, Switzerland, 1993.

       General summary and country-specific description of non-timber harvesting in Latin
       America.
                                          22

-------
IUCN, Parks and Progress: Protected Areas and Economic Development in Latin America and
the Caribbean,  V. Barzetti, Ed., IUCN and  the Inter-American Development Bank, Gland,
Switzerland, 1993.

       Synopsis of workshops and reports from the Feb. 1992 World Congress on National Parks
       and Protected Areas.

Lawrence Berkeley Lab, Carbon emissions and sequestration in forests: Case studies from seven
developing Countries, U.S. Department of Energy, DC, August 1992.

       The study assesses the major effect forest preservation can have  on global warming
relative to other control measures.

Leblanc, Joyce Y., "A Perfect Scene for a Perfect Crime":, Forests and People,  Louisiana
Forestry Association, Forth Quarter 1992, p. 5-11.

       Description of timber theft and investigations of an  estimated $15 million/year of timber
       theft in Louisiana.

Lean, Geoffrey, ed., World Wildlife Fund Atlas of the Environment, Prentice Hall Press, New
York, NY, 1990.

       Environmental Atlas  including narrative and maps on tropical forest destruction,  the
       tropical timber trade, the fuelwood crisis, damaged watersheds, temperate forests under
       threat,  acid  rain, biological diversity and genetic  resources, and protected  areas and
       national parks.

Mahar,  Dennis, Government Policies and Deforestation in  Brazil's Amazon Region. The World
Bank, WWF, and the Conservation Foundation, Washington, DC, 1989.

       Analysis of policies contributing to deforestation and recommendations.

McCloskey, Michael, "Note on the Fragmentation of Primary Rainforest", Ambia, June 1993,
p. 249-250.

       Article indicates forest fragmentation is a precursor of deforestation.

Miller, Kenton  and Laura Tangley, Trees of Life: Saving Tropical Forests and Their Biological
Wealth. Beacon Press,  Boston, MA,  1991.

       Contains many facts  regarding tropical forests  and  the environment, and includes
       recommendations for action.
                                          23

-------
Poole, Peter, Developing a Partnership of Indigenous Peoples, Conservationists, and Land Use
Planners in Latin America, Latin America and the Caribbean Technical Dept., The World Bank,
August 1989.

       Recommendations for partnerships with indigenous peoples, including activities in forest
       areas.

Poole, Peter and Jeffrey Sayer,  The Management of Tropical Moist Forest lands:  Ecological
Guidelines. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland, 1991.

       Fundamental  guidelines and key principles  for management updated from the 1987
       edition.

Raloff, Janet, "Where Acids Reign", Science News. July 22, 1989, p. 56-58.

       Review of the effect of air pollution on forests .

Repetto, Robert, "Deforestation in the Tropics", Scientific American. April 1990, p. 36-42.

       Overview of deforestation causes and effects.

Seager, Joni, Ed.,  The State of the Earth Atlas. Simon & Schuster,  Inc.,  NY,  NY, 1990.

       Global maps showing areas vulnerable to sea level rise as a result of global warming,
       rainforest destruction, proportion of population with access to safe  drinking water,
       desertification risks and soil erosion, proportion of energy supplied by fuelwood and
       charcoal, acid rain, and timber trade.

Serageldin, Ismail, Saving Africa's Rainforests, The World Bank, Washington, DC, 1993.

       Summary and discussion of deforestation in Sub-Saharan Africa with recommendations
       for a comprehensive approach.

Sharma,  Narendra,ed.,  Managing  the World's  Forests:  Looking  for  Balance  Between
Conservation and Development.  Kendall/Hunt Publishing Co., Dubuque,  Iowa, 1992.

       Assessment of the world forestry situation from many perspectives, including watershed
       management,  climate change, biological diversity, fuelwood, concessions,  and forest
       valuation.
                                           24

-------
Trahan,  Tom,  "How to Reduce Chances  for Timber Theft Losses",  Forests  and People.
Louisiana Forestry Association, Forth Quarter, 1992, p. 5.

       Summary of successful program in Louisiana to reduce timber theft on both public and
       private forests.

UNCED (United Nations Conference on Environment and  Development: National Reports
Summaries), Nations of the Earth Report. UNCED, Geneva,  1992.

       Summary of environmental problems, including deforestation, and initiatives for dealing
       with them for 47 country reports.

Wells, Michael and Katrina Brandon, People and Parks: Linking Protected Area Management
with Local Communities. The World Bank,  WWF, and USAID, Washington, DC., 1992.

       Includes case studies of problems and successes with community involvement in protected
       area conservation.

Whelan,  Tensie, Nature Tourism: Managing for the Environment. Island Press, Washington,
DC, 1991.
       Discussion of economic aspects and case studies including forested parks in Kenya and
       Costa Rica.

World Conservation Monitoring Centre,  Global Biodiversity.  World Conservation Monitoring
Centre with IUCN, UNEP, WWF and WRI, Chapman & Hall, London,  England, 1992.

       Detailed summary of information on biodiversity, including a section on national policies
       and instruments in Part 3.

World Bank with IUCN, Conservation of  West and Central African Rainforests. K.  Cleaver, M.
Munasinghe, M. Dyson, N. Egli, A. Peuker,  F. Wencelius, eds., The World Bank, Washington,
DC, 1992.

       Selected papers from the Conference  on  Conservation of West  and Central African
       Rainforests, held in Abidjan, November 5-9, 1990. Subjects include country strategies,
       agricultural nexus, natural forestry management, biodiversity and conservation, forest
      peoples  and products,  economic and fiscal  issues,  and institutional  and private
      participation issues.
                                         25

-------
World Bank, The Forest Sector: A World Bank Policy Paper. The World Bank, Washington,
DC. 1991.

       Outlines the World Bank policy on forests,  including promotion of the conservation of
       natural  forests  and  the  sustainable  development  of managed forestry resources.
       Objectives include support for international efforts and legal instruments to promote forest
       conservation, assistance to government in policy reform and institutional strengthening,
       creation of additional forest resources, and support for initiatives that preserve intact
       forest areas.

World Bank, People and Trees: The Role of Social Forestry in Sustainable Development. Hans
Gregersen, Sydney  Draper, Dieter Elz, eds., The World Bank, Washington, DC, 1989.

       A reference for training those involved in integrating trees into farming and ecological
       systems. Indicates the two most important conditions for success are a high level of local
       participation and substantial political commitment to long  term solutions.

World Resources Institute, The 1994  Information  Please Environmental Almanac, Houghton
Mifflin Co.,  Boston, NY  1993 and 1994.

       Annual almanac with country-by-country descriptions  of environmental problems  and
       issues, including deforestation.  The 1993 edition contains a special section on wetlands
       and forests.
                                           26

-------
WATER RESOURCES AND FORESTRY

Brooks, Kenneth et al,  "Watershed Management: A Key  to Sustainability", Managing the
World's Forests. N. Sharma, ed., Kendall/Hunt Publishing Co., Dubuque, Iowa, 1992, p. 455-
487.
       Description  of a practical framework to identify  and assess priorities for watershed
       management in forestry projects, with examples of successes and problems.

Cheng, Antony and Paul Ellefson, State Programs Directed at the Forestry Practices of Private
Forest Landowners:  Program  Administrators'   Assessment of  Effectiveness.  Minnestota
Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Minnesota, S. Paul, MN,  1993.

       Technical assistance and educational programs were most commonly used, particularly
       for protecting water quality.  Technical assistance programs were judged most effective,
       although regional differences were evident in  the use of programs such as financial
       incentive, tax, and regulatory programs.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Guidance Specifying Management Measures for Sources
of Nonpoint Pollution in Coastal Waters.  (840-B-92-002), Chapter 3,  "Management Measures
for Forestry", USEPA, Office of Water, Washington,  DC 20460, January 1993.

       Detailed description of runoff control measures for forestry  operations, including some
       costs  and  effectiveness  data.    Sections  include preharvest planning,  streamside
       management  areas,  road  construction/reconstruction,  road management,   timber
       harvesting,  site preparation and forest regeneration, fire management, revegetation of
       disturbed areas,  forest  chemical  management,   and wetlands forest  management.
       (Although the title refers to  "coastal",  the measures apply to forestry operations and
       water resources in general (e.g. surface and ground waters).

U.S.  Environmental Protection  Agency,  Economic Analysis of Coastal Nonpoint Source
Pollution Controls: Forestry. December 15, 1992.

       Analysis of the economic feasibility of implementing the management measures for forestry
       discussed in the preceding document.

U.S.  Environmental Protection  Agency  and  Jones  &  Stokes  Associates,  Effectiveness of
Agricultural and Silvicultural Nonpoint Source  Controls. Jones &  Stokes Associates, Inc.,
Bellevue, WA, 1988.

       Many case  studies of silvicultural-related monitoring in Alaska and the western U. S.
       Report includes recommendations for silviculture monitoring.
                                          27

-------
U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency and Tetra Tech,  Inc., Summary of Current State
Nonpoint  Source Control Practices for Forestry.  (EPA-841/S-93-001),  USEPA  Office  of
Wetlands, Oceans and Watersheds,  August 1993.

      A state-by-stale synopsis of the  currently used Best Managment Practices to address
      nonpoint pollution impacts on water quality caused by forestry activities.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,  Region 10, and University of Washington, Monitoring
Guidelines to Evaluate Effects of Forestry Activities on Streams in the  Pacific Northwest and
Alaska.  (EPA/910/9-91-001), USEPA Water Division, Region 10, May 1991.

      Information on how to develop water quality monitoring for forested areas, including
      baseline and compliance monitoring.

U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency and Tetra Tech,  Inc., Water Quality Effects and
Nonpoint Source Control for Forestry: An Annotated Bibliography. EPA-841/B-93-005, Office
of Water, USEPA, Washington, DC,  August 1993.

      More  than 240  pages  of  annotated  technical documents covering  areas  of Best
      Management Practice such as road construction and timber harvest, plus sections  on
      instream studies,  modeling, and  water quality monitoring.

U.S. Forest Service, Stream Habitat Improvement  Handbook. Tech. Pub. R8-TP, U.S. Dept.
of Agriculture, Forest Service Southern Region, Atlanta, Ga., June 1992.

      Includes  instructions  and photos for improving fish  habitat,  including removal  of
      sediment.  Cost estimates are also provided.
                                          28

-------
A2.2  JOURNALS AND NEWSLETTERS

Forestry Support Program, US Forest Service International Forestry, Directory of Selected
Tropical Forestry Journals  and Newsletters..  US National Forest  Service, Washington, DC,
1993.

       A directory of almost 500 periodicals focusing on tropical forestry including contacts, a
summary of the focus  of the publishing organization, frequency  of publication, and target
audience.
                                          29

-------
A2.3  OBTAINING SELECTED PUBLICATIONS



                 HOW TO OBTAIN SELECTED PUBLICATIONS

UNITED NATIONS (FAO) PUBLICATIONS:   Check your local bookstore, or write:

      UNIPUB
      4611/F, Assembly Drive
      Lanham, MD 20706-4391, USA

US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLICATIONS:
      U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
      401 M Street, SW
      Washington, DC 20460, USA

WORLD BANK PUBLICATIONS:
      World Bank
      Publications Office
      1818 H St., N.W.]
      Washington, DC 20433, USA

FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT TRAINING CENTER PUBLICATIONS:
      Federal Law Enforcement Training Center
      Glynco, GA 31524, USA

US FOREST SERVICE PUBLICATIONS:
      Forestry Support Program
      USDA Forest Service
      PO Box 96090
      Washington, DC 20090-6090
                                    30

-------
    APPENDIX 3: SAMPLE LAWS, CRITERIA, PERMITS,
SURVEY FORMS, GUIDELINES, CONTRACTS AND POLICIES
      A3.1  Forest Water Quality Law and Description:
            Commonwealth of Virginia, USA, 1993

      A3.2  Provincial Turbidity Criteria:  British Columbia, Canada
            Feb. 1985

      A3.3  Forest Operation Permit: State of Oregon, USA, 1991

      A3.4  NGO(Non-Government Agency) Stream Quality Survey

      A3.5  Timber Theft Legislation, Prevention Guidelines, and Sample
            Timber Sales Contract:  State of Louisiana, USA

      A3.6  National Forestry Policy:  Costa Rica, 1993
                             31

-------
   APPENDIX A3.1:   Forest Water  Quality Law and Description
                       Commonwealth of  Virginia,  1993.
                                      CHAPTER 948


An  Act to  amend and  reenact § 10.1-1105 of the Code of Virginia and to amend the Code  of
    Virginia  bv adding in Chapter  11  of Title  10.1  an  article numbered 12.  consisting  of
    sections  numbered  10.1-1181.1   through   10.1-1181.7.  relating   to  silvicultural  activities
    affecting water quality: civil penalties.
                                                                                     [H 2055]
                                   Approved April  7, 1993
    Be it enacted  by  the General Assembly of Virginia:
1  That §  10.1-1105 of  the Code of  Virginia is amended  and reenacted  and that the Code  of
Virginia is  amended by adding in Chapter 11 of Title  10.1 an article numbered  12, consisting  of
sections numbered 10.1-1181.1  through 10.1-1181.7, as follows:
    §  10.1-1105.  Additional  powers  and  duties  of State Forester.—The  State  Forester shall
supervise  and  direct  all  forest  interests  and  all  matters  pertaining  to  forestry  within the
Commonwealth.  He  shall  have  charge  of  all  forest  wardens  and  shall  appoint,  direct and
supervise  persons he employs   to perform  labor  in  the forest  reservations or  the nurseries
provided for herein. He shall  take such action as is authorized by  law to prevent and extinguish
forest fires; enforce all laws pertaining to forest and woodlands; prosecute any violation  of such
laws;  collect information  relative to  forest destruction and conditions;  direct the protection and
improvement of all forest reservations; and,  as far as his duties as State Forester will permit,
conduct an educational  course  on  forestry at  the  University  of  Virginia  for  credit toward  a
degree, at  farmers'  institutes  and  at similar  meetings  within  the  Commonwealth. He shall
provide for the protection of state  waters from pollution  by sediment deposition  resulting from
silvicultural  activities as  provided  in Article  12 (§  10.1-1181.1  et  seq.)  of this chapter.  In
addition,  the State   Forester  shall  cooperate  with  counties,  municipalities, corporations and
individuals in preparing  plans and providing technical  assistance for the  protection, management
and replacement of trees,  wood  lots  and timber tracts and the establishment and preservation of
urban  forests, under  an  agreement  that the parties  obtaining such assistance shall  pay the field
and traveling expenses of  the person employed in  preparing  such  plans.
                                         Article  12.
                        Silvicultural Activities  Affecting Water Quality.
    §  10.1-1181.1. Definitions.—As  used in  this article unless  the context  requires a different
 meaning:
     "Operator" means  any person  that operates  or exercises  control over  any  silvicultural
 activity.
     "Owner" means  any person  that (i) owns or leases land on which  silvicultural activity
 occurs or (ii) owns timber on land on  which silvicultural activity occurs.
     "Pollution" means such alteration of the physical, chemical  or biological properties of any
 state  waters resulting from  sediment  deposition  as  will or is likely to create  a nuisance or
 render such waters  (i)  harmful or detrimental or injurious to  the  public  health, safety  or
 welfare, or to  the  health  of  animals,  fish  or  aquatic  life; (ii)  unsuitable  with  reasonable
 treatment for  use   as  present  or  possible  future  sources  of  public  water  supply;  or  (Hi)
 unsuitable for  recreational, commercial, industrial,  agricultural,  or other  reasonable uses.
     "Silvicultural activity" means any forest  management activity,  including but not limited  to
 the harvesting  of timber,  the construction of roads and trails  for forest management purposes,
 and the preparation  of property for reforestation.
     "Special order"  means a  special  order or emergency special order issued  under subsection
 B  or C of § 10.1-1181.2.
     § 10.1-1181.2. Conduct of silvicultural activities; issuance of  special orders.—A.  If the State
 Forester  determines  that  an owner or operator  is conducting or allowing the conduct of any
 silvicultural activity in  a manner  which is causing or is likely  to  cause pollution,  he may
                                             32

-------
                                ACTS OF  ASSEMBLY                          [VA., 1993


 advise the owner or operator of corrective measures needed  to prevent  or cease the pollution
 Failure of the State Forester to advise an owner or operator of such corrective measures shall
 not impair the State Forester's authority  to issue special orders pursuant to subsection B or C
 of  this section
     B. The  State Forester shall have  the  authority  to  issue special orders to anv owner or
 operator  who is conducting, or allowing to be conducted, any silvicultural activity in a manner
 which  is  causing or  is  likely to cause  pollution,  to cease  immediately all or part of  the
 silvicultural activities on the site,  and  to  implement  specified corrective  measures  within  a
 stated period of time. Such special orders are to be issued only after a hearing with reasonable
 notice to the owner or operator,  or  both, of the time, place and purpose  thereof, and thev shall
 become effective  not less  than  five days  after  service  as provided in subsection D  of  this
 section.
     C. If  the State Forester finds that  any owner or operator  is conducting  any silvicultural
 activity in  a manner  which  is  causing or is likely  to cause  an alteration  of  the  physical,
 chemical  or biological properties  of any  state  waters  resulting from  sediment  deposition
 presenting an imminent and substantial danger to (i) the public health, safety or welfare, or the
 health  of  animals,  fish   or  aquatic life;  (ii) a  public  water  supply; or  (Hi)  recreational.
 commercial,  industrial, agricultural  or  other reasonable uses, the State Forester may  issue,
 without advance  notice  or  hearing,  an emergency order  directing the owner or operator, or
 both,  to   cease  immediately  all  or  part of  the  silvicultural activities on the  site,  and to
 implement specified corrective measures within a stated penod of time. The commencement of
 proceedings by the State Forester for the issuance of a  special order pursuant to  subsection B
 of  this section shall not impair the State Forester's authority to issue  an  emergency  special
 order pursuant  to this  subsection.   The  State Forester shall provide  an  opportunity for a
 hearing, after reasonable  notice as to the time and place  thereof to the  owner or operator, to
 affirm, modify,  amend or cancel such emergency special order.
     D. The owner or  operator to  whom such special  order is  directed shall be notified bv
 certified  mail,  return  receipt  requested, sent  to  the last known address  of the  owner,  or
 operator,  or by  personal delivery  bv  an  agent of  the State  Forester,  and  the time  limits
 specified shall be counted from the date of  receipt.
     E.  The  State  Forester shall not  issue a special order to any  owner or  operator  who  has
 incorporated generally acceptable  water quality  protection  techniques in  the  operation  of
 silvicultural activities, which  techniques  have failed to prevent pollution,  if the State Forester
 determines that the pollution  is the direct result  of unusual weather  events which could not
 have been reasonably anticipated.
     F.  Any hearing  required  under this section shall  be  conducted  in  accordance  with §
 9-6.14:12 unless the parties consent to informal proceedings.
     § 10.1-1181.3.  Civil penalties.—A. Any owner or operator who violates, or fails  or refuses to
 obey any  special  order may be assessed a civil penalty  by  the State  Forester. Such  penaltv
 shall not exceed  $5,000 for each violation.  Each day  of  a  continuing violation  may  be  deemed
 a separate  violation for  purposes of assessing penalties.  In  determining  the amount  of  the
 penalty, consideration shall be given  to the owner's or operator's history  of noncompliance; the
 seriousness of the violation,  including any irreparable  harm to the environment and any  hazard
 to  the health or safety of the public; whether the owner or operator was negligent; and the
 demonstrated good faith of the owner or operator in reporting and remedying the pollution.
     B.  A  civil penalty may be assessed by  the  State Forester only after the owner or operator
 has been given an opportunity for a hearing.  Any hearing required under this section shall be
 conducted in accordance  with  § 9-6.14:12, unless the parties consent to informal proceedings. If
 the owner or operator fails to  avail himself of the opportunity for a formal hearing,  a  civil
 penalty shall be assessed  by the State Forester  after  the  State Forester finds that a violation of
 a special  order  has occurred  and the  amount of the civil penalty  warranted, and issues an
 order  requiring that  the civil penalty be paid.
     C. If a person who is required to pay a civil penalty fails to do so, the State Forester mav
 transmit a true  copy of  the final order  assessing such penalty to  the clerk of circuit  court of
 any county or city wherein it  is  ascertained that the  person owing the penaltv has any  estate;
 and the clerk  to  whom such copy is sent shall record it, as a judgment  is required bv  law to
 be  recorded,  and shall index the  same in  the  name  of  the Commonwealth  as well as  of  the
person owing the  penalty, and thereupon there shall  be  a lien in favor  of the Commonwealth
 on  the property of  the owner or operator within such  county  or  citv in  the amount  of  the
penalty. The State Forester may collect civil penalties  which are owed in the same manner as
provided by law  in  respect to judgment of a  court  of record. All  civil penalties shall be paid
 into the state treasury and deposited by the  State  Treasurer into the  Virginia Forest  Water
 Quality Fund pursuant to § 10.1-1181.7.
     D.  With  the  consent of any owner or operator  who  has violated or  failed, neglected or
refused to  obey any special order of the  State Forester issued pursuant  to subsection B or € of
§ 10.1-1181.2, the State Forester may provide, in an order issued  by the State Forester against
such owner or operator, for  the  payment of civil charges for violations  in specific sums,  not to
exceed^ the limit specified in subsection A of this section. Such civil charges shall be in lieu of
                                         33

-------
CH. 948]                            ACTS  OF ASSEMBLY


any  civil penalty  which could be  imposed  under subsection A of this  section, and shall be
placed in the Virginia forest Water Quality Fund pursuant to §  10.1-1181.7.
    §  W.I-1181.4  Final decisions; costs of hearing examiner.—A.  Any final order or decision
rendered pursuant to this article shall be reduced  to writing  and shall contain  the explicit
findings of fact and conclusions of law  upon  which the decision  is based.  Certified copies of the
written decision  shall be  delivered or  mailed  by certified mad to the parties affected by the
decision.
    B.  If  any  final  agencv  case  decision  is  rendered following  a  hearing  conducted in
accordance with  § 9-6' 14:12 presided  over  by a hearing officer,  the officer shall  be  paid by the
State Forester if the owner or operator is  the prevailing party,  or by the owner or operator if
the State Forester  is the prevailing party. The findings of  the hearing officer shall specify which
party prevailed m  the hearing.
    §  10.1-1181.5.  Judicial review.—Any person  aggrieved by a final order  or  decision under
this  article shall be  entitled to  judicial review  thereof in accordance  with  the Administrative
Process Act  (§ 9-6.14:1  et  seq.).  The  commencement of a proceeding for judicial review under
this  section shall not. unless specifically ordered  by the court, operate as  a stay  of  the order or
decision  of the State Forester.
    §  10.1-1181.6.  Enforcement  by  injunction.—Any  owner or operator violating or failing,
neglecting  or refusing to obey any special  order  issued by the State Forester may be compelled
in a proceeding  instituted  in any appropriate circuit court by the State Forester to obey  same
and to complv therewith  bv  injunction, mandamus  or other appropriate remedy,  without the
necessity of showing that  an adequate remedy at law does not exist.
    §   10.1-1181.7,   Virginia  Forest   Water  Quality  Fund  established;  administration   and
disbursements.—A. There is hereby established a  special, nonreverting fund in the state treasury
to be known as  the  Virginia Forest  Water Quality Fund,  hereafter referred to as the Fund, to
be  used for education  efforts, promoting  the  implementation of proper  silvicultural activities,
research,  and monitoring  the effectiveness of practices to prevent erosion  and sedimentation.
The Fund shall be a nonlapsmg fund consisting of moneys  received and credited  to  the  Fund
bv  the State Treasurer for civil penalties and civil charges assessed pursuant  to this  article.
Interest  earned on the  Fund  shall  be  credited to  the Fund. The  Fund shall be established on
the  books of the  State Comptroller.  Any  money remaining in the Fund  at the end of the
biennium shall not revert  to the general fund but shall remain in the Fund.
     B. Disbursement of moneys from the Fund  shall  be  made  by the State Comptroller at the
written  request  of the  State Forester.  Disbursements from the  Fund  may be made for the
purposes set forth in subsection  A  of this  section,  including,  but  not   limited to.  personnel,
administrative,  and  equipment costs and expenses  directly incurred by the Department in
connection  with  such purposes.
                                           34

-------
 Helping Forests
 Provide for
 All Virginians
                                             /«•
 Clean \\ater
•Jobs
• 1000's of Forest
Products Used
Evervdav
Purpose

The purpose of this law is to ensure that those individuals who are not doing their share to
protect water quality through the voluntary program will be prohibited from degrading the
waters of Virginia.

What this law is about!

•This legislation will give the Virginia Department of Forestry (DOF) legal authority to
protect water quality from excessive sedimentation originating from forestry operations.
•This law will come into effect July 1, 1993.
•Procedures  will  be developed  by The Department of Forestry and  will  feature a
cooperative effort  to solve water quality problems.
•The DOF can enter into a Special Order to implement corrective measures for forestry
operations.   Should this be  ignored, a Stop-Work  Emergency Order  may be  issued.
Violation of any order may be subject to a civil penalty of up to $5,000 per day,
•Tracts completed prior to July 1, 1993 will not be subject to the law but active tracts after
July  1, 1993 will be affected.
•The Slate benefits significantly by avoiding an unnecessary  and expensive  regulatory
program. This legislation will be implemented through routine contacts currently conducted
by DOF foresters on a county level.
•If serious water quality  degradation is occurring, a Stop-Work Emergency Order may be
issued immediately.

Answers to frequent questions
Why is this legislation needed? Is the current program ineffective?
The  current non-regulatory program has proven successful.  The logging  community has
responded with good results, indicating widespread support of the stewardship principles of
the non-regulatory plan.  In only a  few instances  have operators been  unwilling to
participate. This legislation is designed to complement the existing voluntary water quality
program.

What groups are supporting this legislation?
Groups endorsing  the  legislation include the Forestry Task Force for Water Quality, the
Virginia Wildlife  Federation, the Lumber  Manufacturer's  Association of  Virginia,  the
Virginia Forestry Association, the Appalachian Forest Management Group, and the Virginia
Chapter of the Association for Consulting Foresters.
                                         35

-------
What will be the extra compliance cost to timber Harvesters and landowners?
One advantage of the proposed legislation is that no extra costs should be incurred by ihc^e
who arc currently adhering to Virginia's non-reguiatory forestry program.

Will there be any costs to the Commonwealth? No.  Although the Department is still short-
handed in many areas of Virginia, the costs to the state should be minimai.  This legislation
can be implemented through routine visits by local DOF personnel to forestry operations.
The number of operations projected to be affected by this legislation are few.

Who will have the authority to enforce this law and how does it work?
Lx)cal county personnel with the DOF would continue to visit forestry operations to monitor
efforts with the current non-regulatory BMP program as well as The Seed Tree I.aw. and
Debris in  Streams Law. The  following is the anticipated sequence of events:

First Visit- «If a problem is found during this visit, the "operator1 or "owner1 will be provided
with recommendations and a  designated time frame for corrections.
Second Visit-* A Notice of Required Action will be issued if the corrective action is not taken.
This Notice of Required Action will have recommendations and a designated time frame for
corrections,
Third Visit-tit the problem is not corrected, an informal conference will be scheduled and
a Special  Order written, signed by both the DOF and the logger.  This Special Order will
have recommendations for correcting the problem and  a designated time frame for
completion.
Fourth Visit-«If the terms of the Special Order are not followed,  a Stop-Work  Emergency
Order will be issued, a formal hearing scheduled, and civil penalty assessed.   Stop-Work
Emergency Orders will be issued by the Regional  Forester.
 NOTE- A STOP-WORK EMERGENCY  ORDER CAN BE ISSUED ANYTIME
 SEVERE WATER QUALITY PROBLEM EXISTS.
                                              IF A
 What safeguards will be in place to protect the timber harvester for land activities taking place
 after he has left the site in compliance with the current non-regulatory program?
 The procedures for the legislation will include provisions for a final inspection by DOF
 personnel at the conclusion of the harvesting job.  If the "operator" or "owner" has used
 proven conservation measures and protected water quality,  he would be relieved from
 future water quality corrective action on the tract.

 If you have any questions, please contact the DOF Regional offices listed below:
 John M. Carroll                 Michael T. Griffin               Frank Burchinal
 PO Box 198                    PO Box Q                      PO Box 100
 Waverly, VA 23890-0198        Charlottesville, VA 22903       Salem, VA  24153-0100
 (804)834-2300                  (804)977-5193                   (703)387-5461
 William L. Saunders
 PO Box 759
 Tappahannock, VA 22560-0759
 (804)443-2211

 J.  Randall Parris
 PO Box 978
 Abmg
-------
             APPENDIX A3.2:  Provincial Turbidity Criteria
                   British Columbia, Canada, Feb. 1985.
                        MINISTRY C~  E.
                      PROVINCE CF 3RITISH COLUMBIA
                       WATER QUALITY CRITERIA FOR
                           PARTICULATE MATTER
                           RECOMMENDED CRITERIA


     These  criteria  are  baaed  on a detailed analysis given in a technical
appendix.
AQUATIC LIFE  (Freshwater. Estuarine, and Marine)
       TURBIDITY (NTU)


       Induced  turbidity  should not exceed 5  NTU when  background turbidity
       is  S50  NTU,  nor should induced  turbidity be more than  10?  of  back-
       ground when background is  >50 NTU.
                                      37

-------
APPENDIX A3.3: Forest Operation Permit

       State of Oregon, USA, 1992
    »~ Z
    1/1 O

    s 2
     c
       53
  O 2
  llll-

  9
  CO
       I 51
       •s\
      1  1
        !!
                                    i! _;
                                      I
                                     1
                    38

-------
VO
                                                                                                                      SIDE ONE

                                              NOTIFICATION OF OPERATION / APPLICATION FOR PERMITS
                                                                     STATE OF OREGON
                                                                   DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY
                                                                    DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
                 FILING THIS DOES NOT GRANT PERMISSION TO REMOVE FOREST PRODUCTS! FIRST GET PERMISSION FROM THE LANDOWNER OR TIMBEROWNER
               I  Cotinly (Cnlr-r only orio)    _  -^r~^    -   I- '—	
                                    »< r. Ap|ir<.|)n«le no»<.» (2A 2F) ?C or :>m

                                     t'A   NOTIL E TO THE SIAIE FOI1FS1FF1 IMAI Ol'l MAIION Wll I fit ( ONIJtle  ttt) ON tANDS DESCRIBED ON REVERSE |OHS 527870]
                                     Dt   API'I K'AIION FOR F't FIMIT TOOI'FFIATF POWf Fl OF1IVF N MAt HINF Hv lORS4/"6?5) F "(lire* al end ol calendar year
                                     2C   APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CLEAR RIGHTS OF WAY (ORS 477 68bl
                                     2D   NOTICE TO THE STATE FORESTER AND THE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE OF THE INTENT TO HARVEST TIMBER (ORS 321 550)
                                  Petson lo bfl conlacled in case ol Fire Emeigency (Designated Representative)  Phone No
                                  PLEASE PRINT'
               CHECK ONE BOX IN THE FAR LEFT COLUMN TO INDICATE WHO FILLED OUT THE APPLICATION
               4  Operator
                  Information
              Zl
              , 5   Landowner
                  Inlormalion
              6  Timberowner
                   and
                 Harvest Tax
                 Payer
              7  Timber Sale
                 Name and/or No
                                  Company Name
                                  Mnilinq Address  Slieel


                                  Cily  Siaie and Zip Code
Name Iitlo


Coni(i,my Name


Mailing Address Slieel


Cily Stole and Zip Code
                                                                                                                     On-site inspections may be conducted by the State Forester/Forest Practices For-
                                                                                                                     ester to ensure compliance with all the laws and rules governing fire protection and
                                                                                                                     forest practices on private land
                                                                                                                                                    APPLICANT REMARKS
   tm Tills


Company Name


Mailing Addtess
                                 Cily Slate at>d Zip Code
                                 Timberowner Employer Identification Number
                                                                                                            Phone No



                                                                                 L	?!	 J Social Security Number
              B  WESTERN OREGON PRIVATE LAND ONLY'
              Is any limber being harvested certified under Ihe Western Oregon Small Tract Optional Tax (WOSTOT) program
              If you have checked Part or  All  please list the number in (he ' WOSTOT Certificate Number box
            FORM B7» 6 ? 1 -00?a |fl«v 11/92) tOK
                                                                                                                           WOSTOT Certificate Number

-------
                                   Instructions For Filling Out
                                           Notification  Of
                                   Operation/Applicatioi
Side One
 File a new notification of operation form (629-6-2- 1-002a Rev. 12/93) at an Oregon Department of
Forestry (ODF) office if any of the following conditions apply:

    • Your operation area is brand new
    • If anything in your current operation has changed in any way
    • If your operation is outside an ODF Forest Protection District (Contact an ODF office
      listed on back page for this information)
    • If your operation area was completed in 1993 and you want to work on another area

    • Multiple harvest units can be listed on one notification BUT! if two or more HARVEST units
      would be separated by a mile or more (in a straight line) file separate notifications for each unit.

 By December 31, 1993, obtain a signature sticker from an ODF field office to renew your Permit to
Operate Power Driven Machinery if both of the following conditions apply:

     •  If you are continuing an  operation in progress with NO changes and
     •  The operation is within an ODF Forest Protection District.
      On-site inspections may be conducted by the State Forester/Forest Practices
      Forester to ensure compliance with all the laws and rules governing fire protection
      and forest practices on private land.
  The instructions are numbered to match the numbered form areas. Please print or type the information
on the form. Do not fill out any grey shaded spaces.  File notice with the State Forester at least 15 days
prior to the date you would like to start operating. A notification is not considered accepted until it is received
by the appropriate Forestry office.  Mail or deliver the form  to one of the offices listed on the back of these
instructions.
 1. "County (Enter only one)". Fill in the county name where the operation will take place.  If an operation
   spans two or more counties, file a separate notification for each county.
     An operation can be any combination of the following activities: harvest of forest crops; road
   construction or reconstruction; site preparation; chemical application; clearing land for use change;
   treatment of slashing; pre-commercial thinning; or other activities which require separate explanation.
           For assistance filling out the notification form contact your local Forestry office.
                                          40

-------
2. "Check Appropriate Boxes (2A. 2B, 2C. or 2D)" Checkmark next to the notice you are giving and/or the
  permit(s) you need. Anyone getting a permit for hauling should check boxes 2B and 2D.

3. "Person to be contacted in case of Fire Emergency (Designated Representative). Phone No.". Print the
  name and telepnone number of the person to contact in case a fire starts on this operation. The person
  should know wnat resources you have available to fight the fire, and have the authority to commit those
  resources in case of a fire.

  "Check one box in the left column to indicate who filled out the application." (Did the operator, landowner or
  timber owner fill out the form?'

4. "Operator Information". Just fill in either a person's or a company's name, address and phone number.
  Add the timber sale name and number in the bottom of this section: "Timber Sale Name and/or No.". This
  information is required for all state and federal sales and is optional for private land timber sales.

5. "Landowner information". Fill in either a person's name or a company's name, address and phone
  number. The landowner has the responsibility to reforest if the harvest results in an understocked
  condition. If the timber to be harvested  is from public land, do not fill out the Western Oregon Private Land
  Only!  portion. If it is a harvest on private land, check with the landowner to see whether the timber has
  been certified under the Western Oregon Small Tract Optional Tax. (WOSTOT) law. Timber removed from
  land certified under WOSTOT is normally exempt from the Western Oregon Severance Tax. If you have
  checked "Part" or "All", please list the certificate number in the WOSTOT Certificate Number box.

 "RC/EG/S" Boxes. Information gathered in RC (Recipient Class), EG (Ethnic Group), and S (size) are
needed for annual federal reports.
RC: (Recipient Class) Write the appropriate code number that best identifies the landowner in the box:
1.  Local  Government                 4. Individual
2.  State Government                 5. Partnership/Corp.
3.  Federal agency                   6. Other (private)

EG:  (Ethnic  Group)  This is the ethnic group of the landowner identified as 4 - Individual in Recipient Class
  Write the appropriate code number which best identifies the individual landowner in the EG box Don't fill in
  a code if the landowner is Recipient Class 1,2,3,5,or 6.
1.  Does not apply                    4. Hispanic                           7. All Other
2.  White                           5. American Indian/Alaskan Native
3.  Black                            6. Asian/Pacific Islander

S: (Land Ownership Size) Enter the appropriate code number that best identifies the total  forest ownership of
  the landowner.
1.  Does not apply                    4. 100-499 acres                       7. 5,000 + acres
2.  0-9 acres                        5. 500-999 acres
3.  10-99 acres                      6. 1,000-4,999 acres

6." Timberowner and Harvest Tax Payer"  You must fill in either a person's or a company's name, address
  and phone number. Fill in EITHER the timberowner's Employer Identification number or the timberowner's
  social security number, not both. The party who owns timber at the point of first measure is the
  timberowner, and is responsibile for paying the taxes.
 SideTwo
                                      Site Information
 .  "Unit Numbers". You assign a one-or two-digit unit number, beginning with 1 and going sequentially up
 to 99. Or, if there is a unit number associated with a state or federal timber sale, use that number in the
 unit column. A unit can be:
     • an operating area with a state or federal sale unit number; or
     • a single operating area within a continuous boundary; or
     • an operating area with a separate harvest tax number; or
     • a separate area within your total operation area on which you plan to conduct a single type of activity
       (for example, 30 acres of clear cut only).


                                                41

-------
   in all cases, all activities you plan on that piece of land should be listed beside the unit number. For
 example, road construction activity needed prior to starting a commercial timber narvest should be
 described along with the harvest activity. If there will be more activities happening in the unit than you can
 fit on one line straight across, continue on the lines below.
   Activity Code. Write the codes for all activities taking place in one unit under this heading.  Use numbers,
 code names and associated  methods. See codes and examples on page four.
   Write the methods you will  use in the "Methods Used" column next to the code for the activity, in the same
 order as the activity codes are listed. If you need more space, go to the next rows down in the same
 column. Write in the brand name of the spray product, the formulation and the carrier. See the example on
 page  4.
   Quantity Column. Fill in either the acres (A) or lineal feet (F) involved in the activity. The example shows
 65 acres of harvest and 3000 ft. of road construction.
   Approximate Thousand Board Feet (MBF) Removed. List the approximate MBF to be removed for each
 unit with commercial timber harvesting.
   "Average age of harvest trees > 40" The number entered as the average age should be the average total
 (not Diameter Breast Height) age of all the commercially harvested timber in the unit. You should not
 attempt to differentiate the age of groups of trees within units. Find the average age over the whole unit.
 Enter the  code for each age group: 0-29, 30-39, 40-59, 60+. (Codes A,B,C, and D.)

8. "Location of Operation" (Legal Descriptions). Enter the legal descriptions for each unit number. If you have
  several rows worth of activities that will take place at one location, REPEAT THE CODES,  not the  legal
  descriptions.

9.3 & 9.b.  "Activity Estimated Starting and Activity Estimated Ending Date". The starting date should be at
  least 15 days after the date the form is received by the appropriate Department office.

10.  " Western Oregon Severance Tax Unit Number". Large landowners will have a list of harvest tax
  numbers which apply to the site(s).

11.  "Site Conditions". Fill in a D,T, and S code for each unit, as shown in the example. Fill in DWS, WG or
  SW codes when necessary.
    D = Distance to Class 1 waters... A Class 1 water is "any portions of streams, lakes, estuaries, significant wetlands,
      or other waters of the state which are significant for (a) domestic use, including drinking, culinary and other
      household human use; (b) angling; (c) water dependent recreation; or (d) spawning, rearing or migration of
      anadromous or game fish."

       D100 = Class 1 waters are within 100 feet of
             the  operation.
       D 1  = Class 1 waters are within V6  mile but greater
             than 100 feet from the operation.
       D 2  = Class one waters are with in  '/4-V* mile of   DWS = The operatjon affects a Domestic Water Supply.
             the  operation                          WG  = The operation takes place in the Willamette
       D 3  = None within '/4 mile.                            Greenway.
     T = Topography ...                              sw  - The operation takes place near a Scenic Waterway.
       T1    is a s ope of 0 to 35 A  (percent)            UQB = Jhe operation takes p(ace wlth an Urban Growth
       T2    is a slope of 35% to 65%                         Boundary
       T3    is a slope greater than 65%               SH  _ The operatjon takes place near a Scenic Highway.
     S = Slope Stability...                             CC  = The operation will result in a single clearcut or
       S1   = No  evidence of mass soil movement               continuation of contiguous clearcuts that exceed
              (landslides, slips, slumps).                      120 acres
       S2   =  Evidence of old slides, small failures.      |C2  = The operation takes place near an influential Class I
       S3   =  Recent or active movement; wet areas.           stream.
 12. If you request a waiver of the 15 day waiting period, check the box and contact the Forest Practices
   Forester (FPF). The FPF will decide if a waiver can be granted.

 13.3. & 13.b. Print your name and date in 13. a. and sign your name and write the date in 13. b.

 14. ATTACH MAP AND/OR AERIAL PHOTOS! The notification form is not complete unless a map or aerial
   photo of the operation area is attached.
                                                42

-------
  Activity Code
Methods Used
Activity Code
Methods Used
1 a.  Partial Cut                Cable/Ground/Other         4a.
(Partial Cut code must not be used for                       4b.
a pre-commercial thinning operation.                        4c.
Can be used for home site preparation.)                      4d.
1b.  Clear Cut                 Cable/Ground/Other         5.
1c.  Cutting only
1d.  Cutting < 40 years old or pre-commercial thinning
2a.  Road Construction         Dozer/Backhoe/Other        6.
2b.  Road Reconstruction       Dozer/Backhoe/Other        7.
3.  Site Preparation           Manual/Mechanical/Burnmg   8.
(Does not include building site preparation.)
  Herbicide Application  •»
  Insecticide Application  I
  Rodenticide Application f
  Fertilizer Application   •»
  Clearing for Land Use
  Change) Local land use
  rules may apply.)
  Treatment of Slashing
  Pre-commercial Thinning
  Others
                                                      G round/Aenal/Complete
                                                        Brand/Name/Carner
                                                        Additives/Application
                                                        Rate
                                                        Burning/Mechanical
                                                        Manual/Chemical
                                                        Explain
Office Address
ASTORIA: RT 1, Box 950. 97103
BAKER CITY: Rt.1, Box 211, 97814
CENTRAL POINT: 5286 Table Rock Road. 97502
COLUMBIA CITY: 405 E. Si, 97018-9737
COOS BAY 300 Fifth St., Bay Park, 97420
DALLAS: 825 Oak VHIa Rd., 97338
FOREST GROVE: 801 Gales Creek Rd., 971 16-1 199
FOSSIL: Star Route, 97830
GRANTS PASS: 5375 Monument Dr., 97526
JOHN DAY: P.O. Box 546, 97845 (400 NW 9th)
KLAMATH FALLS. 3400 Greenspnngs Dr., 97601
LA GRANDE: 61 1 20th St, 97850
LAKEVIEW: 2290 N. 4th St., 97630
MEHAMA: 22965 N. Foric Rd. S.E., Lyons, 97358
MOLALLA: 14995 S. Hwy. 211, 97038
MONUMENT: P.O. Box 386, 97864 (May Street)
PENDLETON:1055 Airport Rd., 97801
PHILOMATH: 24533 Ateea Hwy.. 97370
PRINEVILLE: 220710 Ochoco Hwy., 97754
ROSEBURG: 1758 N.E. Ailport Road, 97470-1499
SISTERS: P O. Box 190, 97759 (221 SW Washington)
SPRINGFIELD: 3150 E. Main St., 97478
SWEET HOME. 4690 Hwy. 20, 97386
THE DALLES: 3701 W. 13th St., 97058
TILLAMOOK 4907 Third St., 97141-2999
TOLEDO: 763 N.W. Forestry Rd., 97391
VENETA P.O. Box 157. 97487
WALLOWA: 802 W. Hwy. 82, 97885
Phone Number
325-5451
523-5831
664-3328
397-2636
267-4136
623-8146
357-2191
763-2575
474-3152
575-1139
883-5681
963-3168
947-331 1
859-2151
829-2216
934-2300
276-3491
929-3266
447-5658
440-3412
549-2731
726-3588
367-6108
296-4626
842-2545
336-2273
935-2283
886-2881
Fax Number
325-2756
523-5874
776-6260
397-6361
269-2027
623-9034
357-4548
763-2027
474-3158
575-2253
883-5555
962-1058
947-3767
859-2158
829-4736
W*S960
276-0710
0294549
447-1469
440-3424
549-9422
726-2505
367-5613
298-4993
842-3143
336-5261
935-0731
886-9085
                                          EXAMPLE
                                              SIDE TWO
. 	 ' "'""TY C°°" 	 ,

	



|/FP*lt*rt)«fi Coon Jt*S
• 	 3
~^
•£—*
/
/
i/


/
/
1 1
1 '/ 2a
r ij :a
u -a


5 4a


4 k

5 .5
CXaniy *opn i "••*"» Go»«m-
Cubic, dozer bum 65 A
Cable dozer bum '
Cjble dozer bum
(_ jblc do2tr bum

Manual 2T
Ground Wcedooe 6iO
diesel none
lOeallonsoericre
Other

Dozer


10

IDt
'(WO 2500 1 D

N E



X





'






700



C




1



x i x










x
X i X




x





N W

X






xi x





.-"



X





X





s w


XI



xi x












Xl X











c 1 T
, 	 _ii_ 	 , E W
6 ' 33S
G
t , L » n i 10 M*T 1" STECOOTOC
iCTrvrrr ! ACTMTY | onoON { ^'^° Di 02 03
ESTi»rEDIESTittrn>|SEVHwei| It al sa
ST»«I«C | ENOK | MI Ml 1 OWS wa SW
1 	 : \ni -MI — r 	 ' 	 —
2IEl 99_ ! I99_ | D2.T2.S2
1 33SI 20E
m
11 32SJ 2IE 99
4/3/
199 D2.T2.S3
•U}/
199

X! 36 12SI :OEI 99 199


X


X


X





! i usj :OE
X j XI 13 33S
1
1
1 33S

1 1 1 1 33S
10E


20F.

JOE
i\u
99
7/15/
199


5/29(
199

Vl/
1 199

199
7/I6/
199


199

&rzj/
JSS 	








D2T1S2
DI.T1S3

DWSD2
TZS2
DIOO.T2.
S2


D3.TI.SI

IttT,,,
fCdUllH,
USE
we*












                                              43

-------
APPENDIX A3.4:   NGO(Non-Government Agency Stream Quality Survey

                       VIRGINIA  SAVE OUR STREAMS

                                Stream Quality Survey

r^e curpcse ci tn;s form is to aid you >n gathering ana recording important oata aoout the health of your stream. By keeomg accurate
ana consistent recoras of your ccservations ana cata trom ycur macro:nvertebra:e count, you can notice ano cocument cnanges in
water quality. Reter to the SOS insect cara ana instructions :o :earn now to trao ana identify the organisms
Stream
County
Grouper individual
Weather conditions
Station
State 1 nnatinn
Number of oarticioants

Stream width (Average)	 ft.
Flow rate: high	      iow_
                                         Water depth (In riffle)
                                       normal	
You should select a riffle where the water is not running too fast (ideal depth is 3 -12 inches), and the bed consists of cobble-sized
stones or larger.
 Monitored riffle area (should be 3 foot square)	
 Date	   Time.
 Type of test: macromvertebrate count _
                                               Average stream depth
                        Water temperature
                                                              Sample Number_
                                   chemical test.
other.
 MACROINVERTEBRATE COUNT

 Use the stream monitoring instructions to conduct a macroinvertebrate count. Use letter codes (A = 1 - 9, B = 10 - 99, C = 100 or
 more) to record the numbers of organisms found in a 3 foot by 3 foot area. Then add up the number of letters in each column and
 multiply by the indicated index value. The following columns are divided based on the organism's sensitivity to pollution.
          SENSITIVE
                                        SOMEWHAT-SENSITIVE
                     TOLERANT










	








I 	
caddisfly larvae
hellgrammite
mayfly nymphs
gilled snails
riffle beetle adult
stonefiy nymphs
water penny larvae



/ of letters times 3 =
index value +










beetle larvae
clams
crane fly larvae
crayfish
I damselfly nymphs
	 | dragonfly nymphs
I scuds
	 I sowbugs
^H fishfly larvae
' alderfly larvae
atherix

| /of letters times 2 =
index value +



















—
aquatic worms
blackfly larvae
leeches
midge larvae
pouch (and other) snails




/ of letters times 1 =
index value
         Now add together the three index values =.
                                               total index value.
 Compare this total index value to the following numbers to determine the water quality of your stream. Good water quality is
 indicated by a variety of different kinds of organisms, with no one kind making up the majority of the sample.
 WATER QUALITY RATING

               !  Excellent (> 22)

           ;    ;  Fair (11-16)
                                             _i Good (17-22)

                                             ] Poor (<11)
  Note: You should test at least 3 different riffles within a 24-foot area to ensure that you have a truly representative sample which
  includes all key organisms. Record results from the sample which gives the best diversity.
           Defenders of Soil, Air,
           Woods, Watenmd
           Wildlife
                                         RETURN THIS FORM TO:  >nak Walton League of America, SOS Program
                                                                1401 Wilson Blvd., Level B,
                                                                Arlington, Va. 22209  (703)528-1818
                                                                                                    nxvcled pjper

-------
Fish water quality indicators:                Barriers to fish movement:
	scattered individuals                 	beaver dams
	scattered schools                    _____  dams
	trout (intolerant to pollution)          	waterfalls
	bass (somewhat-tolerant to pollution)   	other
	catfish (tolerant to pollution)          	none
	carp (tolerant to pollution)

Surface water appearance:                  Odor                              Stability of stream bed:
	brownish                           	rotten egg                  Bed sinks beneath your feet in:
	clear                              	musky	 no spots
	colored sheen  (oily)                 	oil                        	a few spots
	foamy                             	sewage                    	many spots
	milky                              	none
	muddy                            Stream bed deposit (bottom)
         brown                             	grey                       	brown
         black                              	orange/red                 	silt
         grey                               	yellow                     	sand
         other (	)                    	black                      	other (	)
% bank covered by plants,rocks and     Good           Fair          Poor    (> = greater than,  < = less than)
logs (no exposed soil) Is:               >70%       30% -70%       <30%
Stream bank (sides)                      	       	        	
Top of bank (slope and floodplain)         	       	        	

Stream bank vegetation composition:	% shrubs	% grasses	% trees
Stream bank erosion:              	>80% severe              	50%-80%high,
                                    	20%-49% moderate,      	<20%-0% slight

Bed composition of riffle:                    Algae colon                       Algae located:
.	% silt (mud)                        	light green                 	everywhere
	% sand (1/16" -1/4" grains)           	dark green                 	in spots
	% gravel (1/4" - 2" stones)            	brown coated              	% bed cover
	% cobbles (2" -10" stones)           	matted on stream bed
	% boulders (> 10" stones)            	hairy

Land uses In watershed: Record all land uses observed in the watershed area upstream and surrounding your sampling site.
Indicate whether the following potential land uses have a high (H), moderate (M), or slight (S) potential for impact. Refer to the
SOS stream survey instructions to determine how to assess H, M, or S values,
	Oil & gas drilling                    	Sanitary landfill             	Refuse dump
	Housing developments               	Construction               	Fields
	Forest                              	Mining (types)             	Livestock pasture
	Logging                            	             	Other (	)
	Urban uses (parking lots)             	Cropland (types)            	
 Are there any discharging pipes?   	no	yes   If so, how many?.
 What types of pipes are there?     	runoff (field or stormwater runoff) _
 	sewage treatment,   	industrial: type of industry	
 Did you test above and below the pipes to determine any change In water quality and were changes noticed?.
 Describe % and type of litter In and around the stream:
 Comments Indicate what you think are the current or potential future threats to your stream's health:

-------
APPENDIX 3.5:  Timber Theft Legislation, Prevention Guidelines,
        and Sample Sales Contract:  State of Louisiana, USA

                           TIMBER THEFT
 The Problem
 A.  Statewide timber standing inventory according to 1985 Federal Study is approximately
 53 billion board feet of sawtimber and 87 million cords of pulpwood.  Using today's
 market stumpage prices, that's over 8 billion dollars of standing timber which could be
 subject to theft.
 B.  Average retail outlet loses anywhere from 2-4 percent of volume sales through theft.
 Timber theft could very well  surpass that percentage,   the volume of timber stumpage
 sales is approximately $3000 million annually.
 C.     Most cases fall under this State's theft statutes.
        1. Theft - Title  14. Section 67, definitions and penalties:
        Theft is the misappropriation  or taking of anything of value which belongs  to
        another, either without the consent of the other to the misappropriation or taking,
        or by means of fraudulent conduct, practices,  or representations.  An intent  to
        deprive  the  other  permanently of  whatever  may  be  the  subject of the
        misappropriation or taking is essential.

        Whoever commits the crime of theft when the misappropriation or taking amounts
        of a  value of  five hundred dollars or more shall be imprisoned, with or without
        hard labor, for not  more than ten years, or may be fined not more than three
        thousand dollars, or both.

        When the misappropriation or taking amounts to a value of one hundred dollars
        or more, but less than a value of five hundred dollars, the  offender shall  be
        imprisoned, with or without hard labor, for not more than two years, or may  be
        fined not more than two thousand dollars, or both.

        When the misappropriation or taking amounts to less than a value of one hundred
        dollars,  the offender shall be imprisoned for not more than six months, or may
        be fined not more than five hundred dollars, or both.  If the offender in  such
        cases has been  convicted of theft two  or  more times previously,  upon any
        subsequent conviction he shall be imprisoned, with or without hard labor, for not
        more than two years,  or may be fined not more than one thousand dollars,  or
        both.

        When there has been a misappropriation or taking by a number of distinct acts of
        the offender, the aggregate of the amount of the misappropriations or takings shall
        determine the grade of the offense.
                                     46

-------
              2.  The majority of people in the industry are honest, hard-working individuals
              who work in one of the nation's most dangerous professions.
       D. Trees are vulnerable to theft
              1.  Isolated
              2.  Infrequently monitored
              3.  Difficult to trace
                    - L.F.A. Committee to recommend Legislation
              4.  Many landowners don't recognize the value of their timber resources.

II.     Methods of Theft
       A.     Diversion
              1.  Diverting a load of sawtimber or  pulpwood  from a legitimate harvest to
              another mill or woodyard and registering for payment in a name other than the
              rightful owner.
       B.     Cut and Leave
              1.  An individual simply picks someone's land, cuts a load or loads, sells it for
              himself and then moves to someone else's property and repeats the process.
       C.     Fraud or misrepresentation
              1.  laying false claim to the timber through acts of fraud.
              2.  When facts regarding the land and resources are criminally misrepresented to
              the landowner.
       D.     Firewood Theft
              1.  The cutting of firewood for personal use or commercial sales without the
              direct permission of the landowner.
              a.  Large number of individuals participating
              b.  Not viewed as criminal
              c.  Increasing prices of hardwood will require closer monitoring of firewood
              thefts
       E.     Cutting across boundary lines
              1.  Criminal
                    a.   Can  be charged with theft  if cutter willfully  and intentionally cut
                    across boundary lines
              2.  Civil - Previous court decisions allow for mainly three types of recovery
                    a.  Moral bad faith
                           Willful and intentional -  in some cases, the owner can collect up
                           to  three times fair market value plus, reasonable attorney fees,
                           clean and replant land general damages for aesthetic value, expert
                           witness fees, and at time  mental anguish and emotional trauma.
                    b.  Legal bad faith
                           Cutter should have been aware that timber did not belong to him.
                           usually liable for damages three times  fair market  value of timber
                           cut, can be held responsible for reasonable attorney fees if not paid
                           within 30 days after being informed of demand.
                                          47

-------
                    c.  Good faith
                           No evidence to show that cutter should have been aware - is liable
                           for only fair market value of timber at the time it was cut.
       F.     Bribery
              1.  When someone gives or  offers  to give, directly or indirectly,  anything of
              apparent present or prospective value to a private agent, employee or fiduciary
              without the knowledge and consent of the principal or employer in an attempt to
              influence the agent, employee or fiduciary into actions which betrays the best
              interest of the principal's or employer's affairs.

III.    Self Protection
       A.     Boundary Lines
              1.  Make sure boundary lines are correct and well marked (check description at
              courthouse.
                    a.  Will  prevent honest mistakes
                    b.  Add  to the chain of evidence should theft occur
       B.     Frequent visits to property
              1.  Make sure no unauthorized logging activities are taking place
              2.  Daily visits to  site when you have a logging job, including firewood activities,
              in operation or  when one is occurring on adjacent property.
       C.     Absentee owners
              1.  They are especially vulnerable
              2.  Should arrange for an overseer
                    a.  Paid  employee
                    b.  Professional consultant
                    c.  Hunting  Club
                    d.  Friend or neighboring landowners
                    e.  Combination of all
              3.  Make local  authorities aware that you are an absentee landowner.
       D.     Selling of timber
              1.  Check with  the  Office of Forestry on service  offered
              2.  Hire professional consultant
              3.  Draw written contract
                     a.  Spell out limitations and conditions of sale  and method of logging
                     b.   Estimate volume to be cut (cruise or tree count)
                     c.  Identify trees to be harvested
                     d.   Lump-sum sale - excellent method
                     e.  Bid timber to as many buyers as possible
                     f.  Police terms of contract
       E.     Firewood cutting
               1. Make sure permission is directly authorized by you
                     a.   Written
                     b.  Verbal
              2. Specify area and trees to be cut

                                            48

-------
       3.  Do not allow transfer of authorization
       4.  Police cutting activities
F.     If theft occurs
       1.  Report theft as soon as possible
              a. Office of Forestry
              b. Local Sheriffs Office
              c. Both
       2.  Provide as much and as detailed information on alleged theft as possible
              a. Make yourself written notes
       3.  Cooperate to the fullest with authorities
       4.  If arrest is made - PRESS CHARGES
       5.  Positive reinforcement for participating public officials (all landowners)
G.     Rewards
       1.  Louisiana Forestry Association offers rewards of up to $1000 for information
       leading to the  arrest and conviction of individuals responsible for committing
       woods  arson, forestry equipment theft or vandalism and TIMBER THEFT
       2.  The identify of individuals providing information or receiving rewards will be
       kept in strictest confidence.

FOR MORE INFORMATION     Tom Trahan
CONTACT:                      Forestry Enforcement Chief
                                 Louisiana Department of Agriculture
                                 & Forestry
                                 Baton Rouge, LA, USA 70821-0631
                                 (Telephone) 504 925 4500
                                   49

-------
                                                                    Page  1  of 3
                                 Timber Sales Contract


      This contract  is made  and  entered  into by  and between

herein after  called  the Seller  and
herein after  called  the  Buyer.


                                       SECTION   I

      The  buyer agrees to  pay  $	for  all marked

or  designated trees  included  in  this  contract  and  located  on the  Seller's

property ,	Pa rish,  Louisiana, and  estimated  to be 	

acres definitely  designated on  the ground by  the Seller.


                                       SECTION II

      The  Buyer agrees to  the  following conditions:

      A.  No  timber shall  be cut  except that  which has been  marked  or desig-

          nated as  follows:	

      B.  Other merchantable timber, if cut or  unnecessarily damaged, shall
          be  classified according to the highest  product  it  will  make and  be
          be  paid  for  as  follows:

          Sawlogs	S	M Bd . Ft.

          Poles and Piling under  50  feet	S	Eac h

                              over  50  feet	S	Each

          Pulpwood	$	Co r d

          Fence  Posts	$	Each


       C.  All  existing  roads  on the  sale area and on  other  property  of  the
          Seller  shall  be  kept  passable.   Roads  damaged  by  the  logging  oper-
          ation  shall  be  restored  to  their former condition upon  completion
          of operations.



                                             50

-------
                                                             Page  2 of  3
D. Logging debris  in  streams will  be removed as  such  to  allow normal
   drainage.   All  stream  crossings constructed  during  logging shall
   be  re-opened  within  30 days  of  completion of  logging  operations.

E. All  damage  caused  by  the Buyer  or his  agents  to fences  or other
   improvements  of the  Seller  shall be  satisfactorily  repaired  or
   replaced by  the Buyer  within  30 days  of completion  of  operations.

F. Any  fire started by  the Buyer  or his  agents  must be  immediately
   suppressed.   Suppression costs  and damages  resulting  from the  fire
   will  be paid  by the  Buyer.

   In  the event  damages  resulting  from  fire and/or damages under  any
   section of  this contract cannot be agreed upon by  the  Seller  and
   the  Buyer  then  each  will appoint one  representative  who together
   will  select  a third  disinterested party to  form an  appraisal  board
   °f  three members to  determine  damages  under  the terms  of this
   contract.

G. All  timber  shall be  cut and  removed  by	,19
   unless written extension of  time is  granted  and made  a part  of
   this  contract.

H. Failure to  comply with all  the terms  of this  contract  as deter-
   mined by the  aforesaid appraisal will  result  in an  immediate  term-
   ination of  all operations and  an immediate  forfeiture  of the  full
   purchase price of the  timber.
                                SECTION  III

The  Seller agrees to  grant normal  access  across  the sale  area
but  reserves  the  right  to approve  the  location  of  any  new roads.

The  Seller reserves the  right  to  halt  logging operations  if and  when
site  conditions  due to  wet weather become such  that to  continue  said
operations would  cause  undue damage to  the site  and/or  residual  tim-
ber  or  cause  excessive  soil erosion.   Logging would resume when  site
conditions are  such that  logging  operations would  not  excessively
damage  the site  and/or  residual  timber.   This determination of
whether  or not  to suspend or resume logging operations  is a-right
reserved by the  seller.

During  the duration of  this contract,  if  the Seller would suspend
logging  operations for  more than  30 days  in the  aggregate, then  the
difference exceeding  30  days would be  added to  the contract period
as an extension  to the  termination date.
                                 51

-------
                                                                       Page 3  of 3
                                         SECTION   IV

      It is  mutually  agreed:

      A. That this contract may not  be  assigned  in  the whole  or any part
         without  the  written  consent of  the  other party.

      B. In  lieu  of  a performance  bond,  the  Buyer has deposited with  the
                                               Bank,	
         Louisiana,  S	to  be  held  in  escrow  to  cover  any
         penalty  charges  which the  Buyer may incur  under  the  terms of  this
         contract .

      C. As  a  further guarantee  of  a  faithful  performance of  conditions of
         contract,  the  Buyer  delivers  herewith  the  sum  of $	
         in  full  payment  of  the  timber  in  this  sale.

Signed  in duplicate this	day  of	,  19	

WITNESSES:


                                                                  BUYER
                                                                  SELLER
                                              52

-------
                   APPENDIX A3.6:  National Forestry Policy
                                   Costa Rica, 1993

               Costa Rica's Forestry Policy contained in a September 1993
               publication of Costa Rica's Ministry of Natural Resources.
                                   Energy, and Mines
I.  General Forestry Policy (pp. 9-11):

       a)   achieve an  equilibrium between conservation of forest-related natural  resources
(biodiversity, water, soil, and oxygen) with the productive development of the forestry sector,
within the paradigm of  sustainable development.

       b)  apply  within the process of  state reform, a process of administrative deregulation,
accompanied by liberalization of the forestry sector, and a gradual  reduction of incentives for
cutting down trees.

       c)  adapt forestry administration  to focus on promotion and support, making the tecnical
and administrative procedures efficient, in order to enhance the productive process.

       d)  conserve and support the increase of natural forest products and establish and regulate
protected  forests.   At  the same time, increase  the national  forest inventory through  the
recuperation of areas with good forest potential, based upon technical criteria.

       e)  reorient the  utilization of money authorized by the Government of Costa Rica for
forest development.

       f)  look for a more efficient and  competitive forestry industry through modernization of
the industrial process, adequate methods of commercialization, forest pricing, the elimination
of restrictive barriers, and the gradual elimination of industry protectionism.

       g)   increase the capacity of forest  management through investigation,  training, and
forestry extension;  accomplished in coordination with the public and private sectors  and with
universities through mechanisms of technological transfer.

       h)  [not translated since not relevant  to the project.]

       i)  adapt Costa Rica's forestry legislation to it its forestry policy.
                                           53

-------
II.  Specific Forestry Policy (pp.  11-15):

       a)  adapt  customs and non-customs restrictions  as  an indispensable requirement of
fulfilling the objective of giving value or worth to the forests and of assuring sustainability of
forest resources.

       b) establish clear and precise procedures through the creation of procedure manuals, with
the goal of facilitating administration and of promoting the saving of administrative costs for the
Costa Rican Government, but principally with the purpose of making the system convenient for
the user.

       c)  provide  security for forestry investment and ownership,  without restrictions for
sustainable use in accordance with the owner's  interest, provided that the owner complies with
the rules for sustaining this resource.

       d)  development of a  plan of action or management plan (hereinafter  "Management
Plan"), is an indispensable requirement in order to establish and make use of forest plantations
that receive incentives, and in order  to enable use of natural forests.

       e) concentrate forest protection and control functions in areas of forestry interest, while
in other areas permit local organisms such as municipalities and associations to assist in forestry
protection.

       f) promote the formation and operation  of consultative forestry groups, with the goal of
establishing adequate mechanisms of agreement that will benefit forestry development  at the
national  level, but with regional protection.

       g) fortify the infrastructure of the Costa Rican Forestry Department1 in areas of forestry
interest,  in order to facilitate  operating conditions, to  stimulate regional  staff,  and thus to
improve the  Department's efficiency.


       h)  support actions that help consolidate the organization of the forestry private sector.
There  is  special interest in helping the formation  of consortiums and  associations of small
businesses in order to achieve better  business capacity within the concept of democratization of
the economy  through small business.

       i)  authorize a  preponderant role to the State forestry  operation, requiring it to take
responsibility to conduct, control,  and promote the development of private forestry projects.
    1 The "DGF" or "Direction General Forestal" is referred to in this paper, for ease of English use only, as the
 "Costa Rican Forestry Department" or as the "Department of Forestry".
                                             54

-------
       j) reorient the use of incentives authorized by the Government. Use of these incentives
will be exclusively  in lands with forestry potential, and for the administration of degraded,
natural and secondary forests,  for  natural regeneration,  and  for  reforestation  by small land
owners.

       k)  create a mechanism for waiving  payment  of territorial taxes in areas voluntarily
submitted to the State Forestry Operation, and making it attractive to the owners of such areas.

       1) eliminate all time periods for submission of documents. The service provided to users
will be continuous and expedited.

       m) eliminate all transactions or forestry permits required for the profitable use of trees
on an  owner's land.

       n) adapt the granting of authorizations to cut trees to the stages, or steps, established in
the Management Plan.

       o)  accept the right of possession for those that  receive incentives for reforestation,
cutting, profitable use of trees, and forest management,  regardless of whether such persons are
formally registered as the owner.

       p) promote and facilitate the importation and exportation of forestry products.

       q)  eliminate all taxes based on the value  of standing timber.  Solely establish a tax
applicable to the final product, such tax to be paid by the consumer.

       r)  offer technical  assistance to small forest  owners, preferably to those  who  are
organized and who conduct projects of social interest.

       s) produce statistics and data bases as  a basic and elemental function in order to achieve
the full development of

the forestry resource,  in order to determine policy and to support and foster the private sector.

       t)  complete,  in the shortest time possible,  an inventory of the forests in Costa Rica.
This inventory will constitute the basis for a "National Forestry Development Plan", which will
become the  basic model for planning, use of, and benefiting from, forestry resources.

       u) adapt the organizational structure of Costa Rica's Forestry Department to guaranty
the sustainable management of forest resources and to complement the  actions  taken by  the
private sector.

       v)  adequately prepare  the personnel  of the Department of Forestry so that  they can
respond to the required necessities for the development of the forestry sector.


                                            55

-------
       u) decentralize administration and responsibilities in order to provide expedited service.
The regions will offer service of a quality level necessary to resolve all matters or administrative
problems.    The regions will  administer the budgets assigned to them, based  on their basic
needs.
III.  Areas of Natural Forest (pp.  15-17):

       a)  value the producing forest through industrialization and commercialization, with a
large number of permanent and sustained forest products.  Consideration will be given to other
benefits such as social and environmental,  which cannot be quantified  by the  mechanisms of
established markets.

       b)  base  the administration of the forest on the concept of sustainability.  The benefits
from this approach will  be achieved through a combination of  protection and production,
guaranteed  through the  incorporation  of  the technical  rules or  norms established in the
Management Plan.

       c)  guarantee through  the forestry  Management Plan, as  a technical tool to achieve
sustainable use  of the forest, recovery and replacement of the forest in  accordance with the
requirements of national policies and of international rules of sustainability.  This will permit
full backing for commercialization of the wood.

       d) eliminate existing barriers or restrictions to forestry development.  This activity will
be integrated into the national economy,  so  that the market will fix  the prices, and so that these
prices can cover the cost of administration and also provide a clear reference point of forest
activity.

       e)  support the sustainable management  of natural forests  on lands  with good forest
potential through the use  of adequate credits  directed to that end,  providing incentive for the
administration of secondary forests and of degraded or damaged forests in order to support their
growth and production.

       f)  create an incentive for forestry protection, in order to promote the natural regeneration
and permanency of natural, protected forests located in biological corridors, in high valleys, and
in water discharge areas which are of communal and national  interest.

       g)  prevent  changing the use of lands  with tree coverage which  are located in areas of
forest potential, for example, in areas  with  agricultural potential  located in buffer zones to
protected areas or to biological corridors.  Forestry business will be promoted in these areas as
a permitted use  of the land.
                                            56

-------
IV.  Areas of Reforestation (pp. 17 - 19):

       a)  become a driving force for the development of large blocks of reforested areas that
permit the administration, profitable use of,  and industrialization in  an  efficient manner.   A
definition and priority list of the areas marked for inclusion will be prepared.

       b)  authorize incentives for reforestation of lands with good forest  potential, until the
National Forestry Financing Fund (hereinafter "FONAFIFO") is funded.  In addition, use will
be made of fiscal incentives  such as waiving territorial taxes, waiving taxes on uncultivated land,
and protection of land owners  against land squatters.

       c)  without the use of incentives, promote the establishment of compact plantations or
agro-forestry systems in areas  with agricultural potential.  These plantations will be promoted
under the concept of a income-producing product.

       d) promote foreign investment for the financing of reforestation projects which guarantee
a socio-economic benefit to the areas that are developed.

       e) promote the use of native species previously identified and prioritized by  region, and
in so doing thereby foment  research and publication.

       f) establish a "Certificate of Free Harvest" for those plantations established with one's
own resources.

       g)   modify conditions  for incentives, while those are  still  in effect, financing the
management of the plantations until the species on them are mature.  The purpose is to guarantee
the success of the forestry-cultivation program, whose goal is to improve the quality and quantity
of the final products.

       h)  to promote forestry-cultivation in rural communities in order to incorporate them in
the process of reforestation  for commercial purposes.

       i)  give support to fixing the  conditions under which FONAFIFO will provide credit,
such conditions to be based upon research concerning costs and income. With this information,
establish the value of species by region for  use with the establishment and administration of
plantations.
V.  The Forestry Industry (pp.  19 - 20):

       a. adapt the industry to a market that manages typical amounts of natural tropical forest,
but primarily of  small  dimension  and young or  "juvenile"  product from plantations  and
secondary forests.
                                           57

-------
       b.  eliminate restrictions to the installation, enlargement, and transfer of new industry,
permitting competition based on efficiency and technological transfer.

       c. promote industrial conversion based upon an appropriate financing system that permits
industry to make technological changes, transferring part of the benefits to the  owner of the
forest, but always working under the concept of efficiency.

       d.  establish systems of normalization and of standardization of forest products,  so that
the consumer can have better quality products,  while at the same time benefiting  the producer.

       e. promote the commercialization of forest products through stock exchanges and auction
houses, etc., that afford the forest owner direct access to the market and to price information.
                                            58

-------