United States
                  Environmental Protection
                  Agency
                   Enforcement and
                   Compliance Assurance
                   (2201)
EPA 520-F-95-008 l>
   Summer 1995
&EPA       Superfund  At  Work
                  Hazardous Waste  Cleanup Efforts Nationwide
     Colbert Landfill
        Site  Profile
   ,* •!&&&«,,'£>_*. „ . <*. ** 8*. *§6^*^ ?,.* -??4 A. **
 State:
 Congressional
 State and county efforts ensured safe
 drinking water for area residents.
 Success in Brief

 Alerting Environmental  Officials:

 The Community's  Role
  Citizen participation is a key element in environmental protec-
tion. Every day, someone acts as the "eyes and ears" of enforce-
ment officials by reporting violations of various laws. In Spokane
County, reports of industrial waste dumping were taken seri-
ously by Washington state officials.  Complaints from a group of
local citizens led to the discovery of contaminated aquifers which
had fouled private drinking water wells. In turn, the U.S. Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency (EPA) used Superfund authority to
leverage private resources and build a modern ground water
treatment facility.
  The Superfund law is unique in that public participation is
relied upon for  important decisions.  Citizen insight and perspec-
tive are essential when selecting the cleanup remedy for  a site.
At the Colbert Landfill, EPA and  state officials met frequently
with area residents to share information about contaminants and
explain the technical process. Group leaders helped rally other
       citizens to ask for alternative water supplies and a long-
       term monitoring program.  Many long hours went into
       promoting communications among residents and the
       various government agencies involved.  EPA's regional
       office in Seattle later commended local efforts with a
       Citizen Participation Award to the  chairman.
       The Site  Today
         Spokane County operates the ground water treatment
       plant, treating 2.3 million gallons of water per day ex-
       tracted from 10 wells in two aquifers.  A computer-based
       system runs the extraction system, and the treated water is
       tested before discharge to the Little Spokane River.  State
       officials monitor the water quality at the outfall as part of
       the project's continuing compliance program.  State and
       county funds  are now directed at designing a permanent
       landfill cover.         .      . , r,,^¥^^'mn flc^nrv
                     U S. Environment?! Protection Agency
                     Region 5, Library (PL-12J)
                     77 West Jackson Boulevard, 12th Floor
                     Chicago, IL 60604-3590

-------
                       Superfund At Work  • Colbert Landfill Site, Colbert, WA • Summer 1995
                A  Site  Snapshot
  The 40-acre landfill is two
miles north of the City of
Colbert, Washington.  About
1,500 people live within three
miles of the site boundaries.
  Spokane County owned and
operated the landfill for mu-
nicipal  and commercial gar-
bage from 1968 until 1986.  In
the early '70s, a variety of
contaminated liquid organic
solvent wastes,  primarily
volatile organic compounds
(VOCs), trichloroethane (TCA),
and methylene chloride, were
dumped in unlined, open
disposal trenches. These
chemicals were used as clean-
ing solvents in numerous
industrial processes. Over the
years, seasonal  precipitation
filtered through the wastes,
leaching toxic chemicals into
the aquifers.
  Ground water samples from
some residential wells con-
tained concentrations of TCA at
unsafe levels. VOCs can cause
central nervous system disor-
ders and increase the risk of
cancer, but no one has reported
health problems related to the
site.  The Little Spokane River
flows a half-mile away, but
studies have not found any
environmental degradation in
the river ecosystem.
         Colbert Landfill Site
         Colbert, WA
                                      EPA Helps  Lc
  When local residents com-
plained to the Washington
Department of Ecology (Ecol
ogy) about discharges of
industrial waste into open
disposal trenches, Congress
had just enacted the Compre
hensive Environmental Re-
sponse, Compensation, and
Liability Act of  1980
(CERCLA). This law autho-
rized the Superfund prograi
to address abandoned or
uncontrolled hazardous wa;
sites throughout the nation.
EPA asked the states to norr
nate sites for a National Pri<
ties List (NPL),  and Ecology
proposed Colbert  Landfill ii
1982. When early ground
water samples revealed TG
contamination, the Spokane
County Health  District
                                                                              1 landfill closed
   Colbert
   Site
  ~-«Miflls  w^^a|H|N»«"-^A~*w- **-*-». -**
  Timeifte
             Bottled water provided to residents
                        ***>„

                        \

-------
                          Superfund At Work •  Colbert Landfill Site, Colbert, WA •  Summer 1995
                                               Contamination
warned residents to obtain
bottled water.
  Shortly thereafter,  EPA
began a search to identify waste
contributors and notify them of
their potential liability.  In
addition to the county, other
parties included Keytronic,  Inc.,
the Fairchild Air Force Base, and
Alumax,  Inc.
  From the fall of 1983 through-
out 1984, Ecology conducted
extensive field investigations
and analyzed various cleanup
methods.  In the fall of 1985,
area residents formed the
Colbert Landfill Cleanup Action
Committee (CLCAC) to  collect
and distribute information
about the actions planned for
the site.  CLCAC presented
several requests to county
officials, including extending
municipal water hook-ups to
affected homes and long-term
monitoring of private wells.
Spokane County and Keytronic,
Inc. provided bottled water to
those residents whose wells
showed contamination and in
1985, paid to have the public
water supply extended to the
homes.
  Ecology also found extensive
soil contamination at the site
with the potential for toxic
runoff an additional concern.
Workers laid two feet of clean
soil over the entire landfill
when closing it in 1986. EPA
then proposed a cleanup plan to
the community to address the
site contamination.

Phase 1: Ground Water
Treatment
  Following town meetings
and a period of public com-
ment, EPA selected a cleanup
plan for the site in September,
1987.  Subsequently, EPA and
Ecology began negotiations with
Spokane County to conduct the
remedy, including ground water
monitoring and operation and
maintenance.  Keytronic,  Inc.
provided $4.2 million and
Fairchild Air Force Base commit-
ted $1.45 million.  EPA and
Ecology agreed to contribute $2.2
million for the effort but planned
to recover costs at a later  date
from non-settling  parties.  A
settlement with Alumax,  Inc.
added another $750,000 in Janu-
ary, 1993.  The combined $7.85
million was used  to design and
construct a state-of-the-art
ground water treatment system.
   Four wells were subsequently
drilled in the shallow upper
             continued on page 4

-------
continued from page 3
                         Superfund At Work  •  Colbert Landfill Site, Colbert, WA • Summer 1995
aquifer and six wells in the
deep, lower aquifer.  Crews
constructed a network of ap-
proximately 3.4 miles of under-
ground piping to convey con-
taminated ground water to the
treatment plant.   Efforts contin-
ued in 1992 to construct an air
stripping tower to remove, or
"strip", VOCs from ground
water by forcing  an airstream
through the water, causing the
compounds to evaporate and
biodegrade.  Tests of the air
stripping tower began shortly
thereafter and construction of
the plant was completed in
December, 1994.
   As part of the  agreement
with EPA and Ecology, 24
monitoring wells were  located
down- and cross-gradient from
the extraction wells.  Samples
are analyzed frequently to
confirm the interception of the
aquifer plumes.  Other pri-
vately-owned drinking water
wells continue monitoring as
well.
Phase 2: Permanent Landfill
Cover
  Efforts are under way to
engineer a multi-layer cap with
low permeability that will meet
state standards.  The design will
include  surface contouring and
mounding because the area  is
completely flat; rainfall must be
diverted from the surface of the
cap.  Methane gas, a by-product
of decomposing garbage that
will build once the cap is in-
stalled, will be collected using
an underground venting system
and flared at the surface.
County and state programs will
fund the landfill cap construc-
tion, which is scheduled for
completion by  1999.
       Success" at
               and
           'waste, lawdiE
 with waste ounfributors to
 ground wafer 0ctr
 stripping continue by the
 strict coortpli&nee. schedule,
 and slated for construction starting
    EPA reaffirmed Ae
 real peopfe  who live near
 extension  of mwddpal water
 ongrateg tnonitaring ^
 predoos natural resouice^-iDo €asf^
 fouled l^ contaminants. B?r tf*e
 soupa^ and '|gO¥«rnma^l
           inherits a tisaWe'~ water
     Recycled/Recyclable
     Printed with Soy/Canola Ink on paper that
     contains at least 50% recycled fiber
    If you wish to be added to or deleted from our mailing list or to comment on this
   bulletin's content, length or format, please call (202) 260-9812, or send a letter to
       Superfund At Work (2201), 401 M Street SW, Washington, DC 20460
v> EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
(2201)
Washington, D.C. 20460
                                              Bulk Rate
                                              Postage and Fees Paid
                                              EPA
                                              Permit No. G-35
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use $300

-------