EPA-540/1-86-043
                       Environmental Protection
                       Agency
Office of Emergency and
Remedial Response
Washington DC 20460
Off'ce of Research and Development
Office of Health and Environmental
Assessment
Environmental Criteria and
Assessment Office
Cincinnati OH 45268
                       Superfund
ŁEPA
                        HEALTH EFFECTS  ASSESSMENT

                        FOR PENTACHLOROPHENOL
                                  Do not remove. This document
                                  should be retained in the EPA
                                  Region 5 Library Collection.

-------
                                           EPA/540/1-86-043
                                           September 1984
       HEALTH EFFECTS  ASSESSMENT
          FOR PENTACHLOROPHENOL
    U.S. Environmental Protection  Agency
     Office of Research and Development
Office of Health  and  Environmental Assessment
Environmental Criteria and Assessment  Office
            Cincinnati,  OH  45268
    U.S. Environmental Protection  Agency
  Office of Emergency  and  Remedial Response
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency  Response
            Washington,  DC   20460
                                       pr Section Agency
                     230 So:jln t/..~f ;::-••'•
                     Chicago, Illinois €0604
                                           rest

-------
                                  DISCLAIMER

    This  report  has  been  funded  wholly  or  1n  part by  the  United  States
Environmental  Protection  Agency under  Contract  No.  68-03-3112  to  Syracuse
Research Corporation.  It has been  subject  to  the Agency's peer and adminis-
trative review, and  1t has  been  approved  for  publication as an EPA document.
Mention of  trade  names or  commercial  products  does  not  constitute  endorse-
ment or recommendation for use.
                                      11

-------
                                   PREFACE


    This report  summarizes  and  evaluates  Information relevant to  a  prelimi-
nary   Interim   assessment  of   adverse  health   effects   associated   with
pentachlorophenol.    All   estimates  of  acceptable   Intakes  and  carcinogenic
potency presented  In  this document should  be  considered as  preliminary  and
reflect limited  resources  allocated  to this project.   Pertinent  toxlcologlc
and environmental  data  were located  through  on-Hne literature  searches  of
the Chemical  Abstracts,   TOXLINE,  CANCERLINE  and  the  CHEMFATE/CATALOG  data
bases.  The basic  literature searched  supporting this document  1s  current up
to September, 1984.   Secondary  sources of Information  have also  been  relied
upon  1n the  preparation  of  this report  and  represent large-scale  health
assessment  efforts  that   entail   extensive  peer  and  Agency  review.   The
following Office of  Health  and  Environmental  Assessment (OHEA)  sources  have
been extensively utilized:


    U.S. EPA.   1980b.   Ambient  Water  Quality Criteria  for  Pentachloro-
    phenol.  Environmental  Criteria  and Assessment  Office,  Cincinnati,
    OH.  EPA 440/5-80-065.  NTIS PB 81-117764.

    U.S. EPA.   1985.  Drinking  Water  Criteria  Document  for  Pentachloro-
    phenol.   Prepared  by  the   Environmental   Criteria and  Assessment
    Office,  Cincinnati,   OH,  OHEA  for the  Office  of   Drinking  Water,
    Washington,  DC.  Final draft.


    The Intent  1n  these assessments 1s  to  suggest  acceptable  exposure levels
whenever sufficient data  were available.   Values were  not  derived or  larger
uncertainty  factors  were employed when  the  variable  data  were  limited  1n
scope  tending to generate conservative (I.e.,  protective)  estimates.  Never-
theless, the Interim  values  presented reflect  the  relative degree of  hazard
associated with exposure or risk to the chemlcal(s) addressed.

    Whenever possible, two categories  of  values have been  estimated for sys-
temic  toxicants  (toxicants for  which  cancer 1s  not the  endpolnt of concern).
The  first,  the  AIS  or  acceptable  Intake  subchronlc,  1s  an  estimate  of an
exposure  level   that  would not  be expected  to cause  adverse  effects  when
exposure occurs  during  a limited  time Interval (I.e.,   for an  Interval that
does  not  constitute a  significant portion of  the  Hfespan).  This  type of
exposure estimate  has not  been extensively used  or rigorously  defined,  as
previous  risk  assessment  efforts  have  been  primarily   directed  towards
exposures from  toxicants  In  ambient  air or water  where lifetime exposure Is
assumed.   Animal  data  used for  AIS  estimates generally   Include exposures
with  durations  of  30-90  days.   Subchronlc  human data  are  rarely available.
Reported exposures are  usually  from  chronic occupational exposure situations
or from reports of acute accidental exposure.
                                      111

-------
    The  AIC,  acceptable  Intake  chronic,  1s  similar  In  concept  to  the  ADI
(acceptable  dally  Intake).   It  1s  an  estimate  of  an  exposure level  that
would  not  be expected  to cause  adverse  effects  when exposure occurs  for  a
significant portion  of  the llfespan  [see U.S.  EPA  (1980a)  for  a discussion
of  this  concept].   The  AIC  is  route  specific  and  estimates  acceptable
exposure  for  a  given  route with  the  Implicit  assumption that  exposure  by
other routes is Insignificant.

    Composite  scores  (CSs)  for  noncarcinogens  have also  been  calculated
where data  permitted.   These  values  are  used for  ranking  reportable quanti-
ties; the methodology for their development is explained  in U.S.  EPA (1983).

    For compounds for which there  is  sufficient  evidence  of  carcinogenicity,
AIS  and AIC values  are not derived.   For a  discussion  of risk assessment
methodology for  carcinogens  refer to U.S. EPA  (1980a).   Since  cancer  is  a
process  that is  not  characterized by  a  threshold,  any exposure  contributes
an Increment of  risk.   Consequently,  derivation of  AIS and  AIC  values would
be Inappropriate.   For  carcinogens,   q-j*s have been  computed  based  on  oral
and inhalation  data if available.
                                      1v

-------
                                   ABSTRACT
    In  order  to  place  the  risk  assessment  evaluation  in proper  context,
refer  to  the preface  of  this  document.  The  preface  outlines  limitations
applicable to all documents of  this  series as  well  as the appropriate inter-
pretation and use of the quantitative estimates presented.

    There are a number  of subchronic oral  animal  studies which  agree  well
concerning the  NOAEL  for  pentachlorophenol.   Although  fetotoxicity  has  been
associated  with  pentachlorophenol   exposure,  the  NOAEL  for  this  endpoint
appears  to  be  in  the  same  range as  the NOAEL  for  liver  damage  in  adult
animals.  The   sole  chronic  study  suggests  the same  effect  level as  the
subchronic studies.  Therefore,  the  estimated  oral  AIS and AIC  are  both 2.1
mg/day.   A  CS  of  20  was  derived based  on  fetal  toxicity in  rats exposed
orally during the reproductive period.

    There  are  no  adequate   data  concerning  inhalation  exposure  to  this
compound.

-------
                               ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS


    The  Initial  draft  of  this  report  was  prepared  by  Syracuse  Research
Corporation under  Contract No.  68-03-3112  for EPA's  Environmental  Criteria
and  Assessment  Office,  Cincinnati,  OH.   Dr. Christopher  OeRosa and  Karen
Blackburn were the Technical Project Monitors  and  Helen Ball  was the Project
Officer.  The final documents  In  this  series  were  prepared  for the Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response, Washington, DC.

    Scientists from  the  following U.S. EPA offices  provided  review comments
for this document series:

         Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office, Cincinnati, OH
         Carcinogen Assessment Group
         Office of A1r Quality Planning and Standards
         Office of Solid Waste
         Office of Toxic Substances
         Office of Drinking Water

Editorial review for the document series was provided by:

    Judith Olsen and Erma Durden
    Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office
    Cincinnati, OH

Technical support services for the document series  was provided by:

    Bette Zwayer, Pat Daunt, Karen Mann and Jacky Bohanon
    Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office
    Cincinnati, OH
                                      v1

-------
                             TABLE OF  CONTENTS

                                                                       Page

1.  ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY AND FATE	    1

2.  ABSORPTION FACTORS IN HUMANS AND  EXPERIMENTAL ANIMALS 	    3

    2.1.    ORAL	    3
    2.2.    INHALATION	    3

3.  TOXICITY IN HUMANS AND EXPERIMENTAL ANIMALS 	    4

    3.1.    SUBCHRONIC	    4

           3.1.1.   Oral	    4
           3.1.2.   Inhalation	    6
    3.2.   CHRONIC.
           3.2.1.   Oral	    6
           3.2.2.   Inhalation	    6
    3.3.   TERATOGENICITY AND OTHER REPRODUCTIVE EFFECTS.


3.4.
3.3.1. Oral 	
3.3.2. Inhalation 	
TOXICANT INTERACTIONS 	
4. CARCINOGENICITY 	
4.1.


4.2.


4.3.
4.4.
5. REGUU
HUMAN DATA 	
4.1.1. Oral 	
4.1.2. Inhalation 	
BIOASSAYS 	
4.2.1. Oral 	
4.2.2. Inhalation 	
OTHER RELEVANT DATA 	
WEIGHT OF EVIDENCE 	
VTORY STANDARDS AND CRITERIA 	
	 6
	 8
	 8
Q
	 9
	 9
	 9
	 9
	 	 9
	 9
, 	 9
	 10
	 11
                                     vli

-------
                          TABLE OF CONTENTS  (cont.)

                                                                        Page

 6.  RISK ASSESSMENT	    12

     6.1.   SUBCHRONIC EXPOSURE (AIS)	    12

            6.1.1.   Oral	    12
            6.1.2.   Inhalation	    12

     6.2.   CHRONIC EXPOSURE (AIC)  	    12

            6.2.1.   Oral	    12
            6.2.2.   Inhalation	    13

     6.3.   CARCINOGENIC-POTENCY (q-[*)	    13

            6.3.1.   Oral	    13
            6.3.2.   Inhalation	    13

 7.  REFERENCES	    14

APPENDIX: Summary Table for  Pentachlorophenol	    22

-------
                            LIST  OF ABBREVIATIONS

ADI                     Acceptable dally Intake
AIC                     Acceptable Intake chronic
AIS                     Acceptable Intake subchronlc
BCF                     Bloconcentratlon factor
bw                      Body weight
CAS                     Chemical abstract service
CS                      Composite score
GI                      Gastrointestinal
LOAEL                   Lowest-observed-adverse-effect level
MED                     Minimum effective dose
NOAEL                   No-observed-adverse-effect level
NOEL                    No-observed-effect level
ppm                     Parts per million
RVd                     Dose-rating value
RVe                     Effect-rating value
SGPT                    Serum glutamlc pyruvlc transamlnase
STEL                    Short-term exposure limit
TLV                     Threshold limit value
TWA                     Time-weighted average
                                      1x

-------
                     1.   ENVIRONMENTAL  CHEMISTRY  AND  FATE

    The relevant physical  and  chemical properties and environmental  fate  of
pentachlorophenol  (PCP)  (CAS No.  87-86-5)  are as  follows:
Chemical class:            polychlorlnated phenol
Molecular weight:           266.35
Vapor pressure at  20°C:     l.lxKT4 mm Hg             (Verschueren,  1983)
Water solubility at 20°C:  14 mg/a.                   (Verschueren,  1983)
Log octanol/water           5.01
partition coefficient:                               (Verschueren,  1983)
BCF:                       13 In sheepshead minnow,   (U.S.  EPA,  1980b)
                           Cyprlnodon varleqatus
Half-lives 1n:
  Air:                     unknown
  Water:                   14 days                   (Boyle et a!., 1980)
  Soil:                    48 days                   (Rao and Davidson, 1982)
    A  half-life  value  for  pentachlorophenol  1n  air  1s  not  available.
Assuming a first order reaction, and using the equation
                               LN ^ = R] x T,

where:
         A =  Initial concentration
         X =  concentration at time "T"
         R. =  rate constant,

photodecomposltlon half-lives  of  2.2 days  and 32 days may be calculated from
the  data  on  the Irradiation  of  pentachlorophenol with  light  of wavelengths
>290  nm when  the  compound was  adsorbed  on  silica  gel  and  coated  on glass
plates, respectively  (Korte et al., 1978).
                                      -1-

-------
    The mobility  of  pentachlorophenol  1n  soil  1s  not known  with  certainty.
It has  been  reported that pentachlorophenol  sorptlon 1n soils  1s  dependent
on soil pH and organic matter  content.   In organic-rich  acidic soils, penta-
chlorophenol  1s likely to  be  sorbed strongly (U.S.  EPA,  1985).   Conversely,
pentachlorophenol  may  leach  from  soils  having  neutral  or  basic pH  and  low
organic matter  content.
                                     -2-

-------
           2.  ABSORPTION FACTORS  IN HUMANS AND EXPERIMENTAL ANIMALS
2.1.   ORAL
    The  available  studies   Indicate   that   pentachlorophenol   1s  absorbed
rapidly from the  61  tract.   Rats  exposed to  pentachlorophenol  either  In the
diet {350  ppm)  or 1n drinking  water  (-32 mg/S. as  sodium pentachlorophenol)
had  plasma  concentrations   of   30+3   and   40^8   ymol/8.  pentachlorophenol,
respectively, after  7  days  of  exposure  (Meerman  et al., 1980).   Braun and
Sauerhoff  (1976)  reported  that the  average  half-time  for 61  absorption  of
pentachlorophenol  1n monkeys was  2.7  hours.  Braun  et al.  (1978)  reported
that the average  half-time for  absorption of pentachlorophenol  1n human vol-
unteers was  1.3+0.4 hours,  following  administration of  a single  dose (0.1
mg/kg  bw).   Braun et al.  (1977)  also  reported  on the  absorption  of  penta-
chlorophenol 1n  rats.   Following  administration  of a single  oral dose of 10
mg PCP/kg  bw, peak  plasma  levels  of  pentachlorophenol  were reported to be 45
ppm for both males and females 8-12 hours post-treatment.
2.2.   INHALATION
    Casarett et  al. (1969)  demonstrated that  pentachlorophenol  1s  readily
absorbed  by Inhalation.   Workers exposed   to pentachlorophenol  1n a  wood-
treating  plant  1n  Honolulu  were  found to  have  pentachlorophenol  1n  their
urine.   In order  to determine  the possibility of  pentachlorophenol  absorp-
tion by Inhalation, two workers spent  45 minutes  1n an enclosed  process area
resulting  1n mean  urinary concentrations  of pentachlorophenol  equal  to 230
ng/9.  and   432  ng/8. for  the  first and  second  worker,  respectively.   Based
on  respiratory  rates,  estimated  tidal  volume and pentachlorophenol recovery
1n  the urine, absorption of  pentachlorophenol by  these two men was estimated
to be 88 and 76%, respectively, of the  estimated Inhaled dose.
                                      -3-

-------
                3.  TOXICITY  IN HUMANS AND  EXPERIMENTAL ANIMALS
3.1.   SUBCHRONIC
    Ep1dem1olog1cal studies  have  revealed a  variety  of  adverse  effects  due
to  occupational  exposure  to  pentachlorophenol,  but  the  routes  of  exposure
(dermal, oral,  Inhalation) cannot be separated.  These effects  Include serum
enzyme  Induction  (Klemmer, 1972),  Increased  Incidences  of  low-grade  Infec-
tions and Inflammation (Klemmer et  a!.,  1980) and  depressed  kidney function,
which may be partially reversible  (Begley et  a!.,  1977).
3.1.1.   Oral.  Several  studies  of the  subchronlc 'oral  toxldty of  penta-
chlorophenol  1n experimental animals are  summarized  1n Table 3-1.  Oelchmann
et al.  (1942)  exposed  rats,  cats  and rabbits to pentachlorophenol  either  1n
the diet or  by gavage,  but the purity of  the pentachlorophenol  was  unspeci-
fied,  and  the  number  of  animals  observed  was small.   Also,  a number  of
Investigators  have found  that  technical  grade  pentachlorophenol,  contam-
inated  with  d1benzo-p_-d1ox1ns,  produced  effects   1n rats  (following  sub-
chronic  exposure)  that  were not  seen   1n parallel  experiments where  pure
pentachlorophenol  was  used (Johnson et  al.,  1973;  Goldstein  et  al.,  1977;
Kerkvllet et  al.,  1982a,b).   The remaining  studies  summarized  1n Table  3-1
used "pure" pentachlorophenol.
    NOELs of  3  mg/kg  bw/day  and  100 ppm are derived  from  the  rat studies  of
Johnson  et  al.  (1973)  and Goldstein et  al.  (1977),  respectively.   Given  an
average  rat  weight of  300 g and assuming  a  dally  food consumption  of  5%  of
Us body weight, 100 ppm may  be adjusted  to 5 mg/kg bw/day.
    A LOAEL  of 50  ppm based on liver  lesions  might be established  from  the
Kerkvllet et  al.  (1982a,b) study  on mice  (number  of animals was  not  speci-
fied).   Assuming an  average  food  Intake  of  13% of the body weight/day,  the
50 ppm dietary concentration  may be  adjusted  to  6.5 mg/kg  bw/day.
                                      -4-

-------
                                                                              TABLE 3-1

                                                     Subchronlc  Toxlclty  of  Orally  Administered  Pentachlorophenol
i
in
i
Species
Rat
Number
10/group

588
300

ppm
ppm
Dose
in diet
In diet
Duration
26 weeks
28 weeks

No
In
Effects
gross signs of toxlclty.
food consumption and body

Decreases
weight at
I
Reference
Delchmann et al..

1942
           Rat          NR            0, 3, 10 or 30 mg
                                      pure PCP/kg bw/day
           Rat          6/group       0. 20, 100, 500 ppm
                                      pure PCP In the diet
           House        NR            0, 50 or 500 pure PCP
                                      ppm In the diet
                    both doses.  Unspecified htstologlcal
                    abnormalities.

90 days             Increased liver weight at 10 and 30
                    mg/kg.  Increased kidney weight at
                    30 mg/kg.

8 months            At 500 ppm: Increased glucuronyl trans-
                    ferase to aryl hydrocarbon hydroxylase
                    activities; reduction In body weight.

10-12 weeks         Lesions In the liver at both doses.
                    Dose-related  Induction of splenic
                    tumor development following HSV/MSB
                    challenge.*
Johnson et al.,  1973
Goldstein et al.,  1977
Klrkvllet et al., 1982a,b
Rabbit




Rabbit

Cat
Pig






5 35 mg/kg bw by gavage
raised from 35-200
mg/kg bw


23 3 mg/kg bw by gavage

4 1.25 or 2.5 mg/kg bw
4/group 0, 5, 10 or 15 mg
pure PCP/kg bw/day





15 days at
35 mg/kg bw;
19 days after
day 15 dose of
35 mg/kg bw
6 days/week
for 15 weeks
10 weeks
30 days






Death upon Ingest Ion of a total of
190-390 mg/kg bw.



No effect.

No effect.
10 and 15 mg/kg/day: Increased liver
weights. Unspecified dose: diffuse.
cloudy swelling of the hepatocytes.
No hlstopathologlcal changes In the
liver, kidney, spleen, brain and
muscles. No effect on body weight or
blood chemistry.
Delchmann et al., 1942




Delchmann et al., 1942

Delchmann et al.. 1942
Grelchus et al.. 1979






            'Assessment of  the  Immune system
            NR = Not  reported

-------
3.1.2.   Inhalation.  Pertinent  data  regarding  subchronlc  Inhalation  expo-
sure to pentachlorophenol could not be located 1n the available literature.
3.2.   CHRONIC
3.2.1.   Oral.   Only  one  chronic  study  regarding  oral  exposure  to  penta-
chlorophenol was located 1n the available  literature.   Schwetz et  al.  (1978)
exposed groups  of  27  male  and 27  female  rats  to 0, 1, 3,  10  or  30  mg purl-
fled pentachlorophenol/kg  bw/day  for either  22  months (males) or 24  months
(females).   During the  study,  body  weight,  food  consumption and  general
behavior were  recorded  on  a  monthly  basis.   Upon  termination  of  the  study,
endpolnts observed  Included  gross and microscopic  pathology,  organ  weights,
hematologlcal  and  urologlcal   variables  and clinical  chemistry.   At  the  30
mg/kg/day  level  of  treatment,  a  reduced  rate  of  body  weight  gain  and
Increased specific  gravity of the urine were observed  1n  females.   Further-
more, both  sexes had  Increased SGPT  enzyme activity at this  level  of expo-
sure.  Pigmentation of the Hver and  kidneys  was observed  1n females exposed
to  10  or  30 mg/kg/day,  and  In males  exposed  to 30 mg/kg/day.  The  3 mg/kg
bw/day level of exposure thus  represents a chronic NOEL.
3.2.2.   Inhalation.  Pertinent  data  regarding  chronic exposure  to  penta-
chlorophenol by Inhalation  could not be located 1n the available literature.
3.3.   TERATOGENICITY  AND OTHER REPRODUCTIVE EFFECTS
3.3.1.   Oral.   A  number of   studies  that  have  Investigated  the  teratogenl-
clty of  orally administered  pentachlorophenol  1n rodents  are  summarized  1n
Table 3-2  (Larsen  et  al.,  1975;  Schwetz  and Gehrlng,  1973;  Schwetz  et al.,
1974a,b, 1978;  Hlnkle,  1973).  Although these studies  failed  to  demonstrate
teratogenlclty,     fetotoxlc      effects      associated     with      delayed
                                      -6-

-------
                                                                   TABLE 3-2

                                            Teratogenlclty of Orally Administered Pentachlorophenol
Strain/Species
CD rats
No. Dams
6/group
Dose
0 or 60
mg/kg bw
Vehicle
pure PCP
by gavage
Days Administered
single dose on day
8, 9, 10, 11, 12 or
Effects
Three of four malformations were
seen when pentachlorophenol was
Reference
Larsen et al.,
1975
Sprague-Dawley
rats
Sprague-Dawley
rats
NR
20/group
Golden Syrian
hamsters
NR
0-50 mg/kg
bw/day
0, 3 or
mg/kg
bw/day
30
                            NR
diet
1.25-20
mg/kg
bw/day
       NR
                                                             13  of  gestation
                     dally doses on day
                     6-15, 11-12 or 15
                     of gestation
62 days prior to
mating, throughout
gestation to
lactation
                                          days  5-10  of
                                          gestation
                                       administered on day 9 of gestation.
                                       Treatment on day 9 or 10 resulted
                                       In significant reduction In fetal
                                       weight gain.  The authors concluded
                                       that the malformations could have
                                       resulted from maternal toxlclty.

                                       Dose-related fetotoxlclty with a
                                       LOAEL at 5 mg/kg bw/day.
No effect at 0 or 3 mg/kg bw/day.
30 mg/kg bw/day: Significant reduc-
tion In neonatal body weight; de-
creased percent survival of pups
and decreased percent live births.
Increase In lumbar spurs and ver-
tebrae with unfused centra were
attributed to fetotoxlclty.
This dose also resulted In maternal
toxlclty.

Increase In fetal deaths and/or
resorpttons In 3 of 6 groups tested.
No other details In the abstract.
Schwetz and
Gehrlng. 1973;
Schwetz et al.,
1974a,b

Schwetz et al.,
1978
                                                                                 Hlnkle.  1973

-------
skeletal  ossification  were observed.  Schwetz  et  a"). (1974a,b) and  Schwetz
and Gehrlng (1973) reported a dose-related  fetotoxIcHy with  a  LOAEL  of 5 mg
pentachlorophenol/kg bw/day.  A  NOEL  of  3 mg/kg bw/day was established from
the study  of  Schwetz  et al. (1978), In which 10 male and  20  female  Sprague-
Dawley rats were  fed  pentachlorophenol  62 days prior  to mating and  through-
out gestation and lactation.  Fetotoxlc effects as well as  maternal  toxldty
were  seen at a  level  of  30 mg  pentachlorophenol/kg bw/day.   Since  penta-
chlorophenol  apparently  does  not cross  the placental barrier,  the  observed
fetotoxlclty may be a reflection of  maternal toxldty (Larsen  et al.,  1975).
3.3.2.   Inhalation.    Pertinent   data    regarding   the   teratogenlcity   of
Inhaled pentachlorophenol could  not  be located In  the available  literature.
3.4.   TOXICANT INTERACTIONS
    A  recent  study  (Boberg  et  al.,  1983)  Indicates  that  pentachlorophenol
antagonizes  the  tumorlgenlc  effects  of   either  1'-hydroxysafrole  or  Us
metabolite,  1'-sulfooxysafrole,  1n  mouse  liver.   In addition,  pentachlor-
ophenol  1s  known  to  reduce  the toxldty of  N-hydroxy-2-acetylam1nofluorene
(Meerman et al.,  1980;  Meerman  and  Mulder,  1981).   In both cases  the  antag-
onistic effects of  pentachlorophenol  were  reported  to be  due  to  Inhibition
of cytosollc sulfotransferase.
                                     -8-

-------
                              4.   CARCINOGENICITY
4.1.   HUMAN DATA
4.1.1.   Oral.   Pertinent  data  regarding  the cardnogenlcHy  to humans  of
Ingested pentachlorophenol  could not be located In the available literature.
4.1.2.   Inhalation.   Pertinent   data   regarding  the  cardnogenlcHy   to
humans of  Inhaled pentachlorophenol  could  not be  located  1n  the  available
literature.
4.2.   BIOASSAYS
    The  NTP  (1983)  1s  currently  testing  technical  grade  pentachlorophenol
and  Dowlclde  EC-7  (pentachlorophenol)  for  carcinogenic activity.   However,
results from these studies  are not yet available.
4.2.1.   Oral.   Two  studies  demonstrated  that  pentachlorophenol   was   not
carcinogenic  when  administered  orally.    Blonetlcs   Research   Laboratories
(BRL,  1968) administered 46.4 mg pentachlorophenol/kg bw/day by  gavage  from
days  7-28  postpartum to two  strains [(C57B1/6 x C3H/Anf)F  and (C57B1/6  x
AKR)F,j  of  male  and  female  mice  (18/sex/straln).    At  28  days  postpartum,
the  mice  were  transferred  to diets  containing  130  ppm for 78 weeks.   No
significant Increase  1n the  Incidence  of  tumors  was  seen  In  the  treated
animals relative to sham-treated controls  (79-90 mlce/sex/straln).
    Schwetz et  al.  (1978)  exposed groups of  27 male and 27  female  Sprague-
Dawley rats orally  to 0,  1,  3,  10 or 30 mg  pentachlorophenol/kg bw/day  for
22-24 months.   No significant Increase  In the  numbers or types  of tumors  was
observed In the treated  animals  compared with  controls.
4.2.2.   Inhalation.   Pertinent   data   regarding  the  cardnogenlcHy   of
Inhaled pentachlorophenol could  not be located 1n  the  available  literature.
                                     -9-

-------
4.3.   OTHER RELEVANT DATA
    Pentachlorophenol  was  not  found to  be mutagenlc  In Salmonella  typhl-
murlum.  Escherlchla  coll  or  Serratl.a marcescens. regardless  of  the presence
or  absence  of  mammalian  S-9  liver  preparations  (Andersen  et  a!.,  1972;
Simmon  et  al.,  1977;  Lemma  and Ames,  1975; Morlya  et  al.,   1983;  Waters  et
a!.,  1982;  Buselmaler  et  al.,   1973;  Fahrig,  1974).   However,  positive
results  were  obtained  by  Shlrasu  (1976)  and  Waters   et   al.  (1982)  for
Bacillus subtnis.   Fahrig (1974)  reported  that pentachlorophenol  produced a
slight  Increase  1n  chromosomal  aberrations In cultured human  lymphocytes,
but  there   1s  some  question as  to whether  the  Increase   Is  statistically
significant.  In  an in  vitro study, Wyllle et al.  (1975)   reported  that  no
statistically significant  differences  1n  chromosomal  aberrations  were  seen
between  workers  exposed to  airborne  pentachlorophenol   (263-1887  ng/m3)  and
their controls.   In  contrast, Bauchlnger et al. (1982)  observed  a  slight but
significant Increase 1n the  number of chromosomal aberrations 1n  the periph-
eral  lymphocytes  of  workers  exposed to sodium  pentachlorophenol  (mean  blood
concentration   =   4.73^3.41   yg/ms.)   or   pentachlorophenol   (mean   blood
concentration =  2.23+1.51 yg/ma) with respect  to controls.
4.4.  ' WEIGHT OF EVIDENCE
    Based  upon  the  criteria  for  evaluating  the weight  of  evidence of  the
cardnogenldty  of  chemicals for  humans proposed  by the Carcinogen  Assess-
ment  Group  of  the U.S. EPA  (Federal Register,  1984),  there  appear  to  be  no
data  regarding  the cardnogenldty of pentachlorophenol  In  humans,  rats  or
mice.  Pentachlorophenol  1s  most  appropriately classified   1n Group  E   -  No
Evidence of Cardnogenldty for  Humans.
                                     -10-

-------
                     5.   REGULATORY  STANDARDS  AND  CRITERIA

    The U.S.  EPA (19805)  established  an Interim  ADI  of 2.1  mg/man/day for
Ingestlon  of  pentachlorophenol.   This  was  based on  a  NOAEL  of  3  mg/kg
derived from  the study of Schwetz  et  al.  (1978)  on rats  (discussed  1n Sec-
tion 3.2.1.).  Since  the  odor  threshold for  pentachlorophenol  1s  lower than
the Interim ADI, however,  the U.S.  EPA (1980b)  established  a criterion level
of  30  vg/s.  for  pentachlorophenol  In  water  to  protect the  population from
underslrable organoleptlc characteristics.
    The AC6IH  (1983)  has  established  a  TLV-TWA of 0.5  mg/m3 and a  STEL  of
1.5 mg/m3  for  occupational  exposure  to pentachlorophenol,  with the  nota-
tion  that   dermal  absorption  may  contribute  to  overall  exposure.   Since
chronic exposure to  pentachlorophenol  does  not  seem  to produce  cumulative
effects, these  values were chosen  by  analogy to  similar chemicals  and were
Intended to  protect  from  the  vascular  Injury seen upon  acute  exposure  to
pentachlorophenol.
                                     -11-

-------
                              6.   RISK ASSESSMENT
6.1.   ACCEPTABLE INTAKE SUBCHRONIC (AIS)
6.1.1.   Oral.  Several effect  levels  that  could  be used  in  risk  assessment
were  defined  1n Section  3.1.1.   A  NOAEL of  10  mg/kg  bw/day  based on  In-
creased  liver  weight  was  established  from the  study  of  Johnson  et  al.
(1973), though  the numbers of animals treated were  not  reported.   NOELs of 5
mg/kg  bw/day  and 3  mg/kg bw/day  1n  rats were derived  from the  subchronic
toxldty study  of Goldstein  et  al. (1977) and  the  subchronic teratogenicity
study of Schwetz et  al.  (1978), respectively.  Schwetz  et  al.  (1974a,b)  and
Schwetz and Gehring  (1973) reported a LOAEL  of  5  mg/kg  bw/day for  fetotoxic-
1ty  in  rats exposed  to  pentachlorophenol during  gestation.   Since  3  mg/kg
bw/day 1s  the  highest  NOEL,  which 1s lower  than  the  LOAEL for  fetotoxlclty,
this value will be used in the calculation of an AIS.
    Dividing 3  mg/kg bw/day  by an uncertainty  factor of  100 (10  to  account
for the range of sensitivities  in  the  human  population;  10 for  extrapolating
from animals  to humans)  establishes  an Interim ADI of 0.03 mg/kg  bw/day  for
subchronic  Ingestion  of  pentachlorophenol.   Assuming  that  an  average  man
weighs 70 kg,  this  AIS 1s equivalent to 2.1  mg/man/day.
6.1.2.   Inhalation.    The  lack   of  pertinent   data  regarding   subchronic
inhalation  of   pentachlorophenol  precludes   quantitative  assessment  of  risk
due to exposure.  It  1s  not  appropriate  to  derive an  AIS from the  TLV estab-
lished by  ACGIH (1983),  since the value was  derived  by  analogy  to chemicals
similar to pentachlorophenol.
6.2.   ACCEPTABLE INTAKE CHRONIC (AIC)
6.2.1.   Oral.  A NOEL of 3  mg/kg bw/day  can  be  derived from the  chronic
study of Schwetz  et  al. (1978) on  rats.   Dividing 3  mg/kg bw/day  by an  un-
certainty  factor  of   100  (10 for  extrapolating  from animals to  humans;  10
                                     -12-

-------
to  account  for the  range  of  sensitivities  1n the human  population)  estab-
lishes an AIC  of  0.03 mg/kg bw/day  for  chronic  Ingestlon  of pentachlorophe-
nol.  Assuming  that  an average man  weighs  70 kg, this AIC  1s  equivalent  to
2.1 mg/man/day.  This value  1s  1n  perfect  agreement  with  that established  by
the U.S.  EPA (1980b).  U.S.  EPA  (1984) calculated a  CS  for the  effects  of
fetal   toxldty  observed by  Schwetz  et  al.  (1978)  1n rats  fed  diets  that
provided 30  mg/kg/ day  for 110 days  of  the reproductive period.   The  animal
dose  (30 mg/kg/day)  was  converted  to a human  MED  by dividing by  a factor  of
10  to extrapolate from subchronlc  to chronic  exposure  and  multiplying  by 70,
the assumed body  weight  of  an  average  human,   to  express  the result  as
mg/day.  The result, 210  mg/day,  corresponds to  an RV  of  2.0.  The  fetal
toxldty observed  Is assigned  an  RV   of  10.  A  CS of 20,  the  product  of
RV. and RV , 1s calculated.
  d       e
6.2.2.   Inhalation.   The  lack  of  pertinent  data  regarding  chronic Inhala-
tion  of  pentachlorophenol  precludes  quantitative  assessment  of risk due  to
exposure.
6.3.   UNIT CARCINOGENIC RISK (q^)
6.3.1.   Oral.   The  carcinogenic   risk  associated with  Ingestlon of  penta-
chlorophenol cannot  be  quantified,   since  the only  studies  to   date  (BRL,
1968;  Schwetz et al., 1978) have yielded negative  results.
6.3.2.   Inhalation.   The  lack  of  pertinent data  regarding  the  carclnogenl-
dty of Inhaled pentachlorophenol precludes assessment  of carcinogenic  risk.
                                     -13-

-------
                                7.  REFERENCES

ACGIH  (American Conference  of Governmental  Industrial  Hyglenlsts).   1983.
Threshold  Limit Values for  Chemical  Substances and  Physical  Agents  In  the
Workroom  Environment  with  Intended  Changes  for  1983-84.   Cincinnati,  OH.
p. 28.

Andersen, K.J., E.G. Lelghty and  M.T.  Takahashl.   1972.   Evaluation of herb-
icides  for  possible mutagenlc  properties.   J.  Agrlc.  Food  Chem.   20(3):
649-656.  (Cited 1n U.S. EPA, 1985)

Bauchlnger, M., J.  Oresp,  E. Schmid and R. Hauf.   1982.   Chromosome changes
1n  lymphocytes  after  occupational  exposure  to  pentachlorophenol  (PGP).
Hutat. Res.  102(1): 83-88.

Begley, J>, E.L. Relchert, M.N. Rashad  and H.W.  Klemmer.   1977.   Association
between   renal   function  tests   and  pentachlorophenol   exposure.    CUn.
Toxlcol.  11: 97-106.  (Cited 1n U.S.  EPA,  1985)

Boberg,  E.W.,   E.G.  Miller,  J.A.  Miller,  A.  Poland  and  A.  L1em.   1983.
Strong  evidence from studies  with  brachymorphlc mice  and  pentachlorophenol
that  1'sulfooxysafrole  1s  the  major ultimate electrophlUc and  carcinogenic
metabolite  of  1'-hydroxysafrole   1n   mouse   liver.    Cancer   Res.    43(11):
5163-5173.
                                     -14-

-------
Boyle, T.P., E.F. Robinson-Wilson, 3.D. Petty and W. Weber.   1980.   Degrada-
tion  of  pentachlorophenol  1n simulated  lentlc  environment.  Bull.  Environ.
Contam. Toxlcol.   24:  177-184.

Braun,  W.H. and  H.W.  Sauerhoff.   1976.    The  pharmacoklnetlc  profile  of
pentachlorophenol  1n   monkeys.    Toxlcol.   Appl.   Pharmacol.    38:   525-533.
(Cited 1n U.S.  EPA,  1985)

Braun, W.H.,  J.D. Young,  G.E.  Blau  and  P.J. Gehrlng.   1977.   The  pharma-
coklnetlcs  and  metabolism  of  pentachlorophenol   1n  rats.   Toxlcol.  Appl.
Pharmacol.  41: 395-406.   (CUed 1n U.S.  EPA, 1985)

Braun, W.H.,  G.E. Balu  and M.B.  Chenoweth.   1978.  The  metaboHsm/pharma-
coklnetlcs  of  pentachlorophenol  1n man,  and a comparison  with the  rat  and
monkey model.  Toxlcol. Appl.  Pharmacol.   45: 278.   (Cited  In  U.S.  EPA,  1985)

BRL  (B1onet1cs  Research  Laboratories).   1968.   Evaluation  of  the  carcino-
genic,  teratogenlc  and  mutagenlc  activities  of  selected  pesticides  and
Industrial  chemicals,  Vol.  II.   Evaluation of the Teratogenlc Activity  of
Selected  Pesticides and  Industrial Chemicals  1n  Mice  and  Rats.   Publ.  No.
NCI-DCCP-CG1973-1-2.    Prepared   by   BRL,   Bethesda,   MD   for  NCI.    NTIS
PB-223-160.  150  p.   (Cited  1n  U.S. EPA,  1985)

Buselmaler, W.,  G. Rohrborn and P. Propping.  1973.  Comparative  Investiga-
tions of  the  mutagenldty  of pesticides  In mammalian  test systems.   Mutat.
Res.  21(1): 25-26.   (Cited  1n  U.S. EPA,  1985)
                                     -15-

-------
Casarett, L.J., A. Bevenue, W.L. Yauger,  Jr. and  S.A.  Whalen.   1969.   Obser-
vations on pentachlorophenol 1n human blood and urine.   Am.  Ind.  Hyg.  Assoc.
J.  30: 360-366.  (Cited In U.S. EPA, 1985)

Delchmann, W.,  W.  Machle,  K.V. K1tzm1ller  and  G. Thomas.   1942.   Acute  and
chronic  effects  of   pentachlorophenol  and  sodium  pentachlorophenate  upon
experimental  animals.   J.  Pharmacol. Exp.  Therap.   76: 104-117.   (Cited  1n
U.S. EPA, 1985)

Fahrlg,  R.   1974.   Comparative  mutagenldty  studies  with  pesticides.   ln_:
Chemical  Cardnogenesls  Essays.   IARC Scientific  Publ. No.  10.   WHO,  IARC.
p. 161-181.   (Cited 1n U.S. EPA, 1985)

Federal Register.  1984.   Environmental  Protection Agency.   Proposed  guide-
lines for carcinogenic risk assessment.   Federal  Register.   49:  46294-46299.

Goldstein, J.A.,  M.  Frlesen,   R.E.   Under,  P.   Hlckman,  J.R.   Hass  and  H.
Bergman.  1977.   Effects  of pentachlorophenol  on hepatic  drug-metabolizing
enzymes and  porphyrla related  to  contamination  with  chlorinated  d1benzo-p_-
dloxlns and  dlbenzofurans.  Blochem. Pharmacol.   26:   1549-1557.   (Cited  1n
U.S. EPA, 1985)

Grelchus, Y.A., G.W.  L1bal and D.D.  Johnson.   1979.    Diagnosis and  physio-
logic effects of pentachlorophenols on young pigs.  Part  I.  Effects of  purl-
fled pentachlorophenol.   Bull.  Environ.  Contam.  Toxlcol.   23(3):  418-422.
(Cited  1n U.S.  EPA,  1985)
                                     -16-

-------
Hlnkle,  O.K.   1973.   Fetotoxlc  effects of  pentachlorophenol  on  the  Golden
Syrian  hamster.   Toxlcol. Appl.  Pharmacol.   25: 445.   (Cited  1n  U.S.  EPA,
1985)

Johnson, R.L., P.J.  Gehrlng,  R.J. Kodba and B.A.  Schwetz.   1973.  Chlorin-
ated  dlbenzodloxlns  and  pentachlorophenol.   Environ. Health  Perspect.,  Exp.
Issue No. 5, September,  p. 171-175.  (Cited 1n U.S. EPA, 1985)

Kerkvliet,  N.I.,   L.  Baecher-Steppan,  A.T.  Claycomb,  A.M.  Craig and  G.G.
Sheggeby.   1982a.    ImmunotoxIcHy  of  technical pentachlorophenol  (PCP-T):
Depressed humoral  Immune  responses  to  T-dependent  and  T-1ndependent  antigen
stimulation  In PCP-T-exposed  mice.  Fundam.  Appl.  Toxlcol.   2(2):  90-99.
(CA 97: 176334d)   (Cited In U.S.  EPA,  1985)

Kerkvliet,  N.I., L.  Baecher-Steppan and 3.A. Schmltz.   1982b.   ImmunotoxIc-
Hy of  pentachlorophenol  (PCP):  Increased  susceptibility to  tumor  growth  1n
adult   mice   fed   technical   PCVP-contam1nated   diets.    Toxlcol.   Appl.
Pharmacol.  62(1):  55-64.

Klemmer,  H.W.    1972.   Human  health   and  pesticides:  Community  pesticide
studies.  Residue Rev.   41: 55-63.  (Cited  1n U.S.  EPA.  1985)

Klemmer,  H.W.,  L.  Wong,   M.M.  Sato,  E.L.  Relchert,  R.J.  Korsak and  M.N.
Rashad.  1980.   Clinical  findings  1n  workers  exposed  to  pentachlorophenol.
Arch.  Environ.  Contanu  Toxlcol.   9(6):  715-725.   (Cited  1n  U.S.  EPA, 1985)
                                     -17-

-------
Korte,  P.,  D. Freltag,  H.  Geyer, W.  Klein,  A.G. Kraus  and E.  Lahan1at1s.
1978.  Ecotox1colog1c profile analysis: A concept  for  establishing  ecotoxlc-
ologlcal priority 11st for chemicals.   Chemosphere.   1:  79-102.

Larsen, R.V., G.S. Born,  W.V.  Kessler,  S.M. Shaw and  O.C.  VanSlckle.   1975.
Placenta!   transfer  and  teratology  of  pentachlorophenol  1n rats.   Environ.
Lett.  10: 121-128.   (Cited In  U.S.  EPA,  1985)

Lemma, A.  and B.N.   Ames.   1975.   Screening for  mutagenlc  activity of  some
mollusclddes.  Trans. R.  Soc.  Trop.  Med.  Hyg.   69(1):  167-168.   (Cited  In
U.S. EPA,  1985)

Meerman,  J.H.N.  and  G.J.  Mulder.    1981.   Prevention  of  the  hepatotoxlc
action  of  N-hydroxy-2-acetylam1nofluorene   In   the   rat  by  Inhibition  of
N-0-sulfatlon by pentachlorophenol.   Life Sc1.  28(2):  2361-2365.   (Cited  1n
U.S. EPA,  1985)

Meerman,  3.H.N.,  A.B.D.   Van  Doom  and  G.J.  Mulder.   1980.   Inhibition  of
sulfate conjugation  of  N-hydroxy-2-acetylamlnofluorene 1n  Isolated  perfused
rat  liver  and  1n  the  rat In  vivo by  pentachlorophenol  and  low  sulfate.
Cancer Res.  40(10):  3772-3779.   (Cited  1n U.S. EPA,  1985)

Moriya, M.,  T.   Ohta,  K.  Watanabe,  T.  Mlyazawa, K.  Kato  and  Y.  Shlrasu.
1983.   Further  mutagenldty  studies  on  pesticides   1n  bacterial  reversion
assay systems.  Mutat.  Res.   116(3-4):  185-216.   (Cited In U.S.  EPA,  1985)
                                     -18-

-------
NTP  (National  Toxicology Program).   1983.   Chemicals  on  standard protocol.
NTP, Cardnogenesis Testing Program, Bethesda, MO.  (Cited 1n U.S. EPA, 1985)

Rao,  P.S.C.  and  J.M.   Davidson.   1982.   Retention  and  transformation  of
.selected   pesticides   and   phosphorus   1n  soil-water  systems:   A  critical
review.  U.S. EPA, Athens, GA.  EPA 600/5-3-82-060.

Schwetz, B.A. and  P.J.  GehMng.   1973.    The effect of tetrachlorophenol  and
pentachlorophenol  on  rat embryonal  and  fetal  development.   Toxlcol.  Appl.
Pharmacol.  25: 455.  (Cited 1n U.S. EPA, 1985)

Schwetz, 8.A., P.A. Keeler  and  P.J.  GehMng.   1974a.   Effect of  purified and
commercial  grade  tetrachlorophenol on  rat  embryonal  and  fetal  development.
Toxlcol. Appl. Pharmacol.  28: 146-150.  (Cited 1n U.S. EPA,  1985)

Schwetz, 8.A., P.A. Keeler  and  P.J.  Gehrlng.   1974b.   Effect of  purified and
commercial  grade  pentachlorophenol on  rat  embryonal  and  fetal  development.
Toxlcol. Appl. Pharmacol.  28: 151-161.  (Cited 1n U.S. EPA,  1985)

Schwetz,  B.A.,   J.F.  Quast,  P.A.  Keeler,  C.G.  Humlston  and  R.J.  Koclba.
1978.   Results of  two-year  tox1c1ty and  reproduction  studies  on  pentachlor-
ophenol  1n   rats.    In.:  Pentachlorophenol:   Chemistry,  Pharmacology  and
Environmental Toxicology,  K.R.  Rao,  Ed.  Plenum  Press,  New York.   p. 301.
(Cited 1n U.S. EPA, 1985)
                                     -19-

-------
Shlrasu,  Y.   1976.   No  title provided.   J. Environ.  Pollut.  Control.  12:
408.  (Jap.)  (CHed 1n U.S. EPA, 1985)

Simmon,  V.F.,  K.  Kahanen  and R.G.  Tardlff.  1977.   Mutagenlc activity  of
chemicals  Identified  In  drinking water.   Dev.  Toxlcol.  Environ.  Sc1.   2:
249-258.  (CHed In U.S.  EPA, 1985)

U.S.  EPA.   1980a.   Guidelines  and Methodology  Used  In  the Preparation  of
Health  Effects   Assessment   Chapters  of  the  Consent  Decree  Water  Quality
Criteria.  Federal  Register.  45:79347-79357.

U.S.  EPA.   1980b.   Ambient  Water  Quality  Criteria  for  Pentachlorophenol.
Environmental    Criteria   and  Assessment    Office,   Cincinnati,   OH.    EPA
440/5-80-065.   NTIS PB 81-117764.

U.S.  EPA.   1983.   Methodology and Guidelines for  Reportable  Quantity Deter-
minations  Based on  Chronic Toxldty  Data.   Prepared  by the  Environmental
Criteria and Assessment Office,  Cincinnati,  OH,  OHEA for  the  Office  of Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, Washington,  DC.

U.S.  EPA.   1984.  Reportable  Quantity for  Pentachlorophenol.   Prepared  by
the Environmental  Criteria  and  Assessment Office, Cincinnati,  OH, OHEA  for
the Office of  Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Washington,  DC.
                                     -20-

-------
U.S. EPA.   1985.   Drinking  Water  Criteria  Document  for  Pentachlorophenol.
Prepared by  the Environmental  Criteria  and  Assessment  Office,  Cincinnati,
OH, OHEA for the Office of Drinking Water,  Washington,  DC.

Verschueren, K.  1983.  Handbook of Environmental Data on  Organic  Chemistry,
2nd ed.  Van Nostrand Reinhold Company,  New York.  p.  953-956.

Waters, M.D.,  S.S.  Sandhu,  V.F.  Simmon,  et  al.   1982.   Study of  pesticide
genotoxlcity.  Basic  Life Sci.  21: 275-326.  (Cited In U.S.  EPA,  1985)

WylUe, J.A., J. Gablca, W.W.  Benson and J.  Yoder.   1975.   Exposure and con-
tamination  of  the air and  employees  of  a  pentachlorophenol  plant,  Idaho
1972.  Pestic.  Monlt. J.  9:  150-153.   {Cited in U.S.  EPA,  1985)
                                     -21-

-------
O r\) ;o C
zr oo CD  -.-
-• O TO  C^
                                                                APPENDIX


                                                  Summary  Table for Penlachlorophenol
Species
Inhalation
AIS
AIC
Oral
AIS rat
AIC rat
Maximum
composite rat
score
Experimental Effect Acceptable Intake Reference
Dose/Exposure (AIS or AIC}

ND
ND

NOEL = 3 mg/kg bw/day none 2.1 mg/man/day Schwetz et al., 1978
NOEL = 3 mg/kg bw/day none 2.1 mg/man/day Schwetz et al.. 1378

30 mg/kg/day for 110 fetal 20 Schwetz et al., 1978;
days of reproductive toxlclty U.S. EPA, 1984
period (RVd = 2.0) (RVe =- 10)
            ND ^ Not  derived
        o
        a

        >
        era
        
        3
        o

-------