United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Office of Air Quality EPA - 454/R-99-023
Planning and Standards July 1999
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Air
&EPA
Emissions Testing at Gulp
Aluminum Alloys
GULP ALUMINUM ALLOYS
Steele, Alabama
-------
Emissions Testing at Gulp
Aluminum Alloys
Test Report
x)
For U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
Emissions, Monitoring, and Analysis Division
Source Characterization Group
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Attn: Mr. Solomon O. Ricks
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Region 5, Library (PL-12J)
77 West Jackson Boulevard, 12th Floor
Chicago. II 60604-3590
EPA Contract No. 68-D-98-027
Work Assignment No. 2-03
MRI Project No. 4951-03-04
May 21,1999
Midwest Research Institute • 425 Volker Boulevard • Kansas City, Missouri 64110-2299
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-03
Revision: 0
Date: 5/21/99
Preface
This document was prepared by Midwest Research Institute (MRI) for the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) under EPA Contract No. 68-D-98-027, Work
Assignment No. 2-03. Mr. Solomon O. Ricks was the EPA Work Assignment Manager.
In this test report, MRI presents a description of the source tested, the sampling and
analytical results and procedures, quality assurance and quality control activities, reporting
and data reduction activities, sample and data handling procedures, and schedule for the
test project.
The test project was conducted in MRFs Applied Engineering Division under the
leadership of Mr. James Surman, Work Assignment Leader. Mr. John Hosenfeld, Program
Manager, provided oversight to technical and administrative aspects of this work
assignment.
MIDWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE
John Hosenfeld
Program Manager
Approved:
Thomas J. Grant, Ph.D., P.E.
Director
Applied Engineering
May 21, 1999
MRI-AED\R495|.03-04-01 »pd 111
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-03
Revision: 0
Date: 5/21/99
Contents
Preface iii
Tables vii
Section 1. Introduction 1
1.1 Background 1
1.2 Project Summary 1
1.3 Project Personnel 2
1.4 Report Organization 2
Section 2. Process Description and Test Locations 1
2.1 Process and Control Equipment Description 1
2.2 Emission Sampling Locations 1
2.3 Process Data 3
Section 3. Test Results 1
3.1 Objectives and Test Matrix 1
3.2 Test Schedule 4
3.3 Field Test Changes and Problems 6
3.4 Summary of Test Results 8
Section 4. Sampling, Analytical, and Process Data Collection Procedures 1
4.1 Sampling Procedures 1
4.2 Analytical Procedures 4
4.3 Process Data Collection 4
Section 5. Quality Assurance (QA)/Quality Control (QC) Activities 1
5.1 Equipment Calibration 1
5.2 Emission Measurements Quality Objectives 1
5.3 Data Audit 2
5.4 Data Assessment 2
Appendices
Sample Tracking Data
Sample Collection Data
Sample Collection Calibration Data
Semi volatile Analysis Narrative Report
Process Data
MR1-AED\RJ951-03-M-OI
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-03
Section 1
Revision: 0
Date: 5/21/99
Page 1 of 2
Section 1.
Introduction
1.1 Background
Section 112 of the Clean Air Act requires the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) to list and regulate categories of all major and some area sources that emit one or
more of the hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) listed in Section 112(b) of the Act. Secondary
aluminum production facilities were listed under Section 112(c)6 as sources for control of
dioxin and furan emissions. Due to the nature of the processes in the industry, EPA
believes that secondary aluminum production facilities are also a large source of polycyclic
organic matter (POM) and polyaromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) emissions and as such should
be tested for these HAPs. The POM and PAH emissions data could then be used to include
secondary aluminum production facilities on the list of sources that need control for POM
and PAHs under Section 112(c)6 thus displacing some relatively minor sources of these
HAPs that are currently included on the list.
1 .2 Project Summary
The purpose of this test project was to obtain uncontrolled and controlled POM and
PAH emissions data from a chip drying process and a side-well reverberator/ furnace
process at a secondary aluminum production facility to support a national emission
standard for hazardous air pollutants.
Midwest Research Institute (MRI) obtained uncontrolled and controlled POM and
PAH emissions data from the chip drying process and a side-well reverberatory furnace
process at the Gulp Aluminum Alloys facility in Steele, Alabama. Specifically, MRI
(1) measured POM and PAH emissions simultaneously at the inlet and outlet of the lime-
injected baghouse used to control emissions from the chip dryer, and (2) measured POM
and PAH emissions simultaneously at the inlet and outlet of the lime-injected baghouse
used to control emissions from a side-well reverberatory furnace.
The test matrix is summarized in Table 3-1 (Section 3, Test Results). The target POM
and PAH compounds are listed in Table 3-2. Testing was done during normal process
operation. One test, consisting of two runs, was conducted on the lime-injected baghouse
for the chip dryer, and another test, also consisting of two runs, was conducted on the lime-
injected baghouse for the side-well reverberatory furnace. Each series of two test runs was
conducted with simultaneous sampling at inlet and outlet locations for all emission
components being measured. Measured emission parameters were identical at inlet and
MRI- AED\R495 1 -03-04-01
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-03
Section 1
Revision: 0
Date: 5/21/99
Page 2 of 2
outlet locations and for both tests. All sample analysis for POM and PAHs were performed
at MRI's laboratories in Kansas City, Missouri.
MRI used Methods 1, 2, 3B, 4 and 5 in 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, and Method 0010 in
"Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical (SW-846)" to measure
emissions and collect samples. Method 8270C in SW-846 was used for analysis of
samples for POM and PAHs. These methods include technical quality standards and
criteria which were included in the quality control requirements for this project.
1.3 Project Personnel
The following individuals were responsible for the management and execution of this
test project:
• Mr. Solomon O. Ricks, EPA Work Assignment Manager; Office of Air Quality
Planning and Standards; Emissions, Monitoring, and Analysis Division; Source
Characterization Group
Phone (919)541-5242
• Mr. Juan Santiago, EPA Test Coordinator, Office of Air Quality Planning and
Standards, Emissions Standards Division
• Mr. Ken Kirby, Site Coordinator, Gulp Aluminum Alloys
• Mr. James S. Surman, Jr., MRI Work Assignment Leader, Midwest Research
Institute
1.4 Report Organization
Results of testing are presented in the following sections of this document. Section 2
provides process information. Section 3 provides test results and Section 4 provides a
description of sampling, analytical and process data collection. Finally, Section 5 provides
a summary of QA/QC results.
MRI-AED\R4951-03-04-01
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-03
Section 2
Revision: 0
Date: 5/21/99
Page 1 of 5
Section 2.
Process Description and Test Locations
2.1 Process and Control Equipment Description
The Gulp Aluminum Alloys facility in Steele, Alabama, is a secondary aluminum
production facility, primarily smelting recycled aluminum to produce aluminum alloys
used in cast aluminum products. The facility accepts many different forms of scrap
aluminum feedstock and operates a chip dryer to volatilize oils and lubricants from the
scrap aluminum prior to the melting operation. The chip dryer emissions are captured by
closed hoods and are ducted to a lime-injected baghouse. Side-well reverberator/ furnaces
are used to melt, flux, and alloy the aluminum scrap that has been processed in the chip
dryer operation along with unprocessed, but furnace-ready aluminum scrap. The side-well
reverberator/ furnace tested was Furnace No. 1. Emissions are captured by a canopy hood
located above the charging and fluxing side-well and ducted to a second lime-injected
baghouse.
The lime-injected baghouse used to control chip dryer emissions operates at
approximately 170°F with a slightly positive pressure. The inlet test location is in a
circular and horizontal duct that is upstream of the fan at the inlet to the baghouse. The
outlet test location is in a circular duct that exits the baghouse horizontally and bends to a
vertical exhaust section.
The lime-injected baghouse used to control Furnace No. 1 emissions operates at
approximately 100 to 200°F with a slightly negative pressure. The inlet test location is in a
circular and horizontal duct that is upstream of the flame arrester and baghouse inlet
manifold ducting. The outlet test location is a circular, vertical stack.
2.2 Emission Sampling Locations
Sampling was conducted for emissions from the chip dryer at the inlet and outlet of the
baghouse used to control dryer emissions. Sampling was also conducted for emissions
from the Furnace No. 1 at the inlet and outlet of the baghouse used to control furnace
emissions. The following descriptions are relevant to the number of traverse points used at
each location and the sampling time at each point. Information on duct dimensions,
distance from the nearest flow disturbances, and traverse point locations is found in
Appendix B.
MRl AED\R 4951-03-04-01
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-03
Section 2
Revision: 0
Date: 5/21/99
Page 2 of 5
The internal diameter of the ducts at all four sampling locations was found to be
slightly irregular, i.e., 2 diameters at 90 degrees in each duct were not the same. Diameters
were measured at each duct through both test ports. The average of the two measured
diameters was used to calculate the cross sectional area at each location.
2.2.1 Chip Dryer Baghouse Inlet
Two 4-inch ports, 90° apart, were used on the horizontal, circular, steel duct for
Method 0010 sampling and associated measurements. A total of 12 traverse points was
used, six on each traverse across the 18-inch diameter. Each point was sampled for
15 minutes with the Method 0010 train.
2.2.2 Chip Dryer Baghouse Outlet
Two 4-inch ports, 90° apart on the vertical section of the circular, steel duct were used
for Method 0010 sampling and associated measurements. A total of 24 points was used,
twelve on each traverse across the approximately 23-inch diameter. Each point was
sampled for 7'/2 minutes with the Method 0010 train.
2.2.3 Reverberatory Furnace No. 1 Baghouse Inlet
Two 4-inch ports, 90° apart on the horizontal, circular duct were used for
Method 0010 sampling and associated measurements. A total of 12 points was used, six
on each traverse across the approximately 37-inch diameter. Each point was sampled for
50 minutes with the Method 0010 train. After ten hours of sampling at all 12 points,
sampling was conducted at a single point for the remainder of each run. A point was
chosen where the velocity closely approximated the average gas velocity at the start of
single-point sampling.
MRI-AED\R4951-03-04.01
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-03
Section 2
Revision: 0
Date: 5/21/99
Page 3 of 5
2.2.4 Reverberatory Furnace No. 1 Baghouse Outlet
Two 4-inch ports, 90° apart on the vertical, circular stack were used for Method 0010
sampling and associated measurements. A total of 24 points was used, twelve on each
traverse across the 46-inch diameter. Each point was sampled for 25 minutes with the
Method 0010 train. After 10 hours of sampling at all 24 points, sampling was conducted at
a single point in the same manner as at the inlet location.
2.3 Process Data
Process parameter data were collected by facility, EPA, and MRI personnel. Process
data for the chip dryer is summarized in Table 2-1, and for reverberatory Furnace No. 1 in
Table 2-2.
MR1-A£D\R4951-03-CW-OI
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-03
Section 2
Revision: 0
Date: 5/21/99
Page 4 of 5
Table 2-1. Chip Dryer Operating Parameter Summary
Run No. 1: Started 2/9/99 10:15 Finished 2/9/99 13:45
Material Description
Mixed material containing aluminum chips and curl, oil-based
cutting fluid, and oxidized iron.
Weights (Ib)
Before Drying
After Drying
Gross Weight
Clean Dry Weight
Recovered Iron
Recovered Fines
Recovered Cyclone Tailings
Difference (Burn Up)
Avg Kiln Temp. (°F)
Avg Duct Temp. (°F)
Avg Baghouse Temp. (°F)
Avg Lime Injection Rate (LB/HR)"
13,454
Net.
8,429
1,460
1,720
622
12,231
1,223
411
447
171
25
Run No. 2:
Started 2/9/99 15:45
Finished 2/9/99 19:15
Material Description
Mixed material containing aluminum chips and curl, oil-based
cutting fluid, and some iron.
Weights (Ib)
Before Drying
After Drying
Gross Weight
Clean Dry Weight
Recovered Iron
Recovered Fines
Recovered Cyclone Tailings
Difference (Bum Up)
Avg Kiln Temp. (°F)
Avg Duct Temp. (°F)
Avg Baghouse Temp. (°F)
Avg Lime Injection Rate (LB/HR)'
10,472
Net
8,568
292
650
JO
9,520
952
342
427
165
25
"Based on four 50-lb bags/8-hr shift.
MR1-AED\R4951-03-04-01
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-03
Section 2
Revision: 0
Date: 5/21/99
Page 5 of 5
Table 2-2. Reverberatory Furnace Operating Parameter Summary
Melt Started: 2/11/99 11:15
Melt Number: 99A05400
Furnace Number: 1
Bundles Produced: 56
Avg. BaghouseTemp 1 (°F): 135
Net Charge Weight Summary
Shavings, Turnings
Clean Solids, Plate
Shredded Aluminum
Shredded Casts
CL CU AL Radiators-Raw Mtrl.
Silicon - Raw Material
Total Net Charge Weight (Ib)
Net Chlorine Injection Weight (Ib)
Production Time Summary
Alloy Time
Charge Time
Clean Off
Tap Time
Total Cycle Time (hr)
Melt Stopped: 2/11/99 23:45
MRI Test Run No. 1
Product Number: 862201
Avg. BaghouseTemp 2 (°F): 138
Total
11,900
7,340
67,580
16,700
7,520
12,640
123,680
826
0.25
7.50
1.25
3.50
12.50
Average Charge Rate During Cycle (Lb/Hr) 9,894
Average Chlorine Injection Rate During Cycle (Lb/Hr) 66
Average Lime Injection Rate During Cycle (Lb/Hr) 25
Melt Started: 2/12/99 10:00
Melt Number: 99A05600
Furnace Number: 1
Bundles Produced: 66
Avg. BaghouseTemp 1 (°F): 117
Net Charge Weight Summary
Shavings, turnings
Shredded Aluminum
Road Signs
Shredded Casts
CL CU AL Radiators-Raw Mtrl
Unclean CU AL Radiators
Shredder Material
Silicon-Raw Material
Total Net Charge Weight (Ib)
Net Chlorine Injection Weight (Ib)
Melt Stopped: 2/12/99 23:00
MRI Test Run No. 2
Product Number: 862201
Avg. BaghouseTemp2(°f): 127
Total
17,760
68,160
2,320
19,400
4,500
5,440
940
9,600
128,120
1,140
Production Time Summary
Charge Time
Clean Off
Tap Time
7.25
1.75
4.00
Total Cycle Time (hr) 13.00
Average Charge Rate During Cycle (Lb/Hr)
Average Chlorine Injection Rate During Cycle (Lb/Hr)
Average Lime Injection Rate During Cycle (Lb/Hr)
9,855
88
25
MRI-AEDVR495I- 03-04-01
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-03
Section 3
Revision: 0
Date: 57 2199
Page 1 of 14
Section 3.
Test Results
3.1 Objectives and Test Matrix
The purpose of this test project was to obtain uncontrolled and controlled POM and
PAH emissions data from the chip drying process and a side-well reverberatory furnace
process at the Gulp Aluminum Alloy facility to support a national emission standard for
hazardous air pollutants. The specific objectives were to:
• Measure POM and PAH emissions simultaneously at the inlet and outlet of the
lime-injected baghouse used to control emissions from the chip dryer, and
• Measure POM and PAH emissions simultaneously at the inlet and outlet of the
lime-injected baghouse used to control emissions from the side-well reverberatory
Furnace No.l.
The test matrix is summarized in Table 3-1. The target POM and PAH compounds are
listed in Table 3-2. Testing was done during normal process operation. One test,
consisting of two runs, was conducted on the lime-injected baghouse for the chip dryer,
and another test, also consisting of two runs was conducted on the lime-injected baghouse
for the side-well reverberatory furnace. Each series of two test runs was conducted with
simultaneous sampling at inlet and outlet locations for all emission components being
measured. Measured emission parameters were identical at inlet and outlet locations for
both tests. All sample analysis for POM and PAHs was performed at MRFs laboratories in
Kansas City, Missouri.
MRI-AED\R4951-03-04-0! »p
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-03
Section 3
Revision: 0
Date: 5/2199
Page 2 of 14
Table 3-1. Test Matrix—Summary of Sampling and Analysis Parameters and Methods Per Test Run
Sampling
location
Chip dryer
lime-injected
baghouse
inlet
Chip dryer
lime-injected
baghouse
outlet
Sampling or
measurement
time
3 hours
3 hours
Test method and
sample size
SW-846, Method 0010,
s3m3
40 CFR 60, Appendix A,
Method 2
40 CFR 60, Appendix A,
Method 3B, ;=20L
40 CFR BO, Appendix A,
Method 4, ;>3 m3
SW-846, Method 0010,
^3m3
40 CFR 60, Appendix A,
Method 2
40 CFR 60, Appendix A,
Method 3B, ?20L
40 CFR 60, Appendix A,
Method 4, ?3 m3
Emission
Parameters
POM and PAHs'
Velocity, pressure,
temperature,
volumetric flow
rate
Molecular weight
Moisture
POM and PAHs"
Velocity, pressure,
temperature,
volumetric (low
rate
Molecular weight
Moisture
Total number of samples
or sample component
sets per run
1 set
NA
1
1
1 set
NA
1
1
Preparation
method
Solvent extraction
NA
NA
NA
Solvent extraction
NA
NA
NA
Analytical method
GC/MS (SW-846, Method
8270C)
Pilot tube,
thermocouple
Orsat
Gravimetric
GC/MS (SW-846, Method
8270C)
Pilot tube,
thermocouple
Orsat
Gravimetric
' The POM and PAHs to be analyzed are those listed in Table 3-2.
MRI-AEDVR4951-03-04-01 wpd
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-03
Section 3
Revision: 0
Date: 5/2199
Page 3 of 14
Table 3-1 (Continued)
Sampling location
Reverberatory
furnace no.1 lime-
injected baghouse
inlet
Reverberatory
furnace no. 1 lime-
injected baghouse
outlet
Sampling or
measurement
time
1 entire cycle
1 entire cycle
Test method and
sample size
SW-846, Method 0010,
:>3m3
40 CFR 60, Appendix A,
Method 2
40 CFR 60, Appendix A,
Method 3B, ;>20L
40 CFR 60, Appendix A,
Method 4, 23 m3
SW-846, Method 0010,
23m3
40 CFR 60, Appendix A,
Method 2
40 CFR 60, Appendix A,
Method 3B, 220L
40 CFR 60, Appendix A,
Method 4, s3 m3
Emission
Parameters
POM and PAHs"
Velocity, pressure,
temperature,
volumetric flow
rate
Molecular weight
Moisture
POM and PAHs*
Velocity, pressure,
temperature,
volumetric flow
rate
Molecular weight
Moisture
Total number of
samples or sample
component sets per run
1 set
NA
1
1
1 set
NA
1
1
Preparation
method
Solvent extraction
NA
NA
NA
Solvent extraction
NA
NA
NA
Analytical method
GC/MS (SW-846, Method
8270C)
Pilot tube,
thermocouple
Orsat
Gravimetric
GC/MS (SW-846, Method
8270C)
Pitot tube,
thermocouple
Orsat
Gravimetric
The POM and PAHs to be analyzed are those listed in Table 3-2.
MR1-ACDVR495I-03-04-01 wpd
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-03
Section 3
Revision: 0
Date: 5/21/99
Page 4 of 14
Table 3-2. List of Target Compounds
Compound CAS No.
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Anthracene
Benz[a]anthracene
Benzo[a]pyrene
Benzo[to]fluoranthene
Benzo[fif,/7,/]perylene
Benzo[/c]fluoranthene
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
1 -Chloronaphthalene
Chrysene
Dibenzofuran
Dibenz[a,h]anthracene
Dibenzothiophene3
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Hexachlorobenzene
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
83-32-9
208-96-8
120-12-7
56-55-3
50-32-8
205-99-2
191-24-2
207-08-9
101-55-3
90-13-1
218-01-9
132-64-9
53-70-3
132-65-0
206-44-0
86-73-7
118-74-1
193-39-5
91-20-3
85-01-8
129-00-0
a Not listed in Method 8270C.
3.2 Test Schedule
Testing began February 9 and continued through February 12, 1999. Table 3-3
presents the test run times. The first test run at the chip dryer was preceded by preliminary
measurements and a check for absence of cyclonic flow on the day of the run. No check
for cyclonic flow was conducted at the reverbatory furnace due to time constraints and
because duct configurations and the proximity of upstream and downstream disturbances
indicated that any cyclonic or non-laminar flow would be insignificant and well with the
criteria specified in Method 1. Once preliminary measurements were completed and final
preparations were in progress, the Site Coordinator and other personnel were notified of
run start times.
MRI-AED\R4951-03.fr!-01
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-03
Section 3
Revision: 0
Date: 5/21/99
Page 5 of 14
Table 3-3. Emissions Testing Run Times
Run No./Location Date
Chip Dryer Baghouse Inlet
Run 1 2/9/99
Run 2 2/9/99
Chip Dryer Baghouse Outlet
Run 1 2/9/99
Run 2 2/9/99
Furnace No. 1 Baghouse Inlet
Run 1 2/11/99
Run 2 2/12/99
Furnace No. 1 Baghouse
Outlet
Run 1 2/11/99
Run 2 2/12/99
Start Time Stop Time Sampling Time (min
10:15
12:15
15:45
17:45
10:15
12:15
15:45
17:45
11:30
14:15
17:15
19:55
10:15
10:45
13:00
16:10
18:55
11:30
14:15
17:00
19:35
10:15
12:50
15:35
18:15
11:45
13:45
Total:
17:15
19:15
Total:
11:45
13:45
Total:
17:15
19:15
14:00
16:45
19:45
23:45
Total:
10:35
12:55
15:30
18:40
23:15
Total:
14:00
16:45
19:30
23:45
Total:
12:45
15:20
18:05
23:15
Total:
90
90
180
90
90
180
90
90
180
90
90
180
150
150
150
230
680
20
130
150
150
260
710
150
150
150
250
700
150
150
150
300
750
MRI-AED\tW95l-03-04-OI
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-03
Section 3
Revision: 0
Date: 5/21/99
Page 6 of 14
3.3 Field Test Changes and Problems
3.3.1 Sampling
Changes from the site-specific test plan and the quality assurance project plan (QAPP)
implemented at the test site and problems encountered during the tests are discussed here.
Three changes from the site-specific test plan and the QAPP were implemented as a
result of conditions encountered at the test site.
1. No checks for absence of cyclonic flow were conducted at the furnace baghouse
locations. The inlet location met the Method 1 eight- and two-diameter criteria,
and the configuration of the stack indicated that any cyclonic or non-laminar flow
would be insignificant and meet Method 1 criteria.
2. EPA made a decision at the test site to test the furnace baghouse through entire
cycles instead of conducting 3-hour runs as indicated in the plans. Because there
was some uncertainty as to the length of each cycle, it was decided to conduct 10
hours of sampling with an equal amount of time at each traverse point. After 10
hours of sampling, single-point sampling was conducted for the remainder of the
run. The velocity at the point sampled approximated the average velocity at the
location when single-point sampling was started.
3. EPA made a decision at the test site that two (2) runs at the chip dryer baghouse
and two (2) runs at the furnace baghouse rather than three runs at each location
would provide the data needed for the purpose of the tests.
Three problems were encountered during the tests.
1. During the first run at the baghouse inlet for the chip dryer, the gas sample bag
developed a leak. The bag was replaced with a new bag midway through the run.
Because of this, a valid sample for gas molecular weight determination was
collected only for the last half of the run. Analytical results from the bag sample
collected during the second run on the same day are the same as those for the last
half of the first run. Because the results from both runs were the same and the
process appeared to be running at a steady condition, the results from the bag
representing half of the run were used for the entire run.
2. The duration of the runs at the furnace baghouse made it necessary to collect two
gas bag samples at each location during the first run. The analytical results from
each bag at a location were combined on a time-weighted basis to arrive at the
average results for the run. Sampling flow rates were lowered for the second run
MR1-AED\R495I-03.(M-01 wpd
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-03
Section 3
Revision: 0
Date: 5/21/99
Page 7 of 14
so that only one bag had to be used at each location. At approximately 2 hours
before the end of each run, bag sampling was stopped because the bags became
full. It was determined during the first run that the gas being sampled during the
first half of a cycle contained a small amount of carbon dioxide and a small
amount of additional oxygen from the combustion and reduction reactions
occurring during furnace charging. During the final half of a cycle, the gas being
sampled was essentially ambient air. Because the gas being emitted during an
entire cycle was essentially ambient air and the gas composition during each half
of a run was not significantly different for the purpose of molecular weight
determination, the lack of sampling during the final 2 hours of each run did not
impact the gas molecular weight results.
3. Volumetric gas flow rate measurements (dry standard cubic feet per minute) for
inlet and outlet locations did not agree well. Possible reasons for the
discrepancies follow:
a. The flow rate results at the chip dryer baghouse outlet were approximately
9 to 11% lower that those at the inlet. The discrepancy was not due to gas
molecular weight differences. During the test, some fugitive emissions from
baghouse doors and joints were observed, indicating that some outleakage
occurred between the inlet and outlet locations. Also, the location of the two
ports on the outlet duct (stack) may not have been optimized for
representative flow data collection. The gas in the duct exited the baghouse
horizontally to a bend after which it was directed vertically upward. The
proximity of the ports in the vertical section to the bend indicated that the
velocity profile in the cross sectional sampling area would be irregular. This
was verified by observation of impacted paniculate matter on a portion of the
duct wall that was directly downstream of the outside of the bend. The
sampling area near the wall with impacted paniculate matter was between the
two traverses because the ports were located 45 degrees from the curvature of
the bend rather than 0 and 90 degrees. This did not allow sampling points to
be located in the cross sectional area where the highest velocities would be
expected to occur.
b. The flow rate results at the furnace baghouse outlet were approximately 18 to
22% higher that those at the inlet. The discrepancy was not due to gas
molecular weight differences. The lime injection pipe and possibly some
other points of inleakage caused a significant discrepancy in flow rate results
between the two locations.
MRI-AED\RJ95I-03-04-01 v,pd
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-03
Section 3
Revision: 0
Date: 5/21/99
Page 8 of 14
3.3.2 Analysis
The QAPP had been amended to reflect data quality control objectives appropriate to
analytes of interest. The change involved use of additional surrogates during analysis to
assess recoveries of target compounds in addition to PAHs. Analyses were performed
according to the amended plan.
All XAD/filter extracts were colored to some degree. When extracts from the furnace
baghouse inlet were put into the Kudema-Danish concentrator, they coated the inside with
fine black material. When this occurred, it was decided that the samples should be filtered
through Acrodiscs prior to final concentration.
The internal standard recovery for the furnace baghouse inlet run 2 sample was low for
d,2-Perylene. A duplicate analysis was performed on a 1:5 dilution with similar results.
Matrix effects were suspected to be the cause. Results for analagous compounds have been
flagged in Section 3.4 of this report.
3.4 Summary of Test Results
Data obtained from sampling trains are summarized in Table 3-4. Each sampling train
provided data on gas velocity, temperature, pressure, O2, CO2, and volumetric flow rates.
Results from semivolatile organic compounds analysis are summarized in Tables 3-5
through 3-8 along with subsequent calculations to obtain POM and PAH concentrations
and emissions.
MR1-AED\R495I-03-04-OI »p
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-03
Section 3
Revision: 0
Date: 5/21/99
Page 9 of 14
Table 3-4. Method 0010 Sampling Data Summary
Sampling location
Run number
Date
Run time
Sampling time, minutes
Flow rate at dry std, conditions
dscm/min
dscfm
Flow rate at wet std. conditions
scm/min
scfm
Flow rate at actual conditions
acm/min
acfm
Average gas velocity
meters/mm
feet/min
Average gas temperature
°C
°F
Average gas pressure
mm Hg
in. Hg
Moisture (water vapor), % v/v
Dry gas mol. wt., g/g-mole (Ib/lb-mole)
Wet gas mol. wt., g/g-mole (Ib/lb-mole)
Carbon dioxide, % v/v dry basis
Oxygen, % v/v dry basis
Carbon monoxide, % v/v dry basis
Average isokinetic sampling variation, %
Gas sample volume
dry standard m3
dry standard ft3
Chip dryer baghouse
1
02/09/99
inlet duct
2
02/09/99
1015-1345 1545-1915
180
175
6,183
185
6,542
229
8,094
1,446
4,744
79
175
29.08
739
5.5
28.94
28.34
1.0
19.4
0.0
99.2
3.645
128.727
180
162
5,704
170
5,994
209
7,365
1,316
4,316
76
169
29.02
737
4.8
28.94
28.41
1.0
19.4
0.0
98.4
3.335
117.791
Chip dryer baghouse outlet stack
1 2
02/09/99
1015-1345
180
156
5,516
165
5,816
197
6,972
706
2,317
73
163
29.47
749
5.2
28.93
28.36
0.9
19.6
0.0
102.6
2.861
101.049
02/09/99
1545-1915
180
147
5,196
155
5,485
186
6,559
664
2,180
71
161
29.41
747
5.3
28.93
28.35
0.9
19.6
0.0
102.4
2.693
95091
MR1-AED\R4951-03-04-01 wpd
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-03
Section 3
Revision: 0
Date: 5/21/99
Page 10 of 14
Table 3-4 (Continued)
Sampling location
Run number
Date
Run time
Sampling time, minutes
Flow rate at dry std, conditions
dscm/min
dscfm
Flow rate at wet std. conditions
scm/min
scfm
Flow rate at actual conditions
acm/min
acfm
Average gas velocity
meters/min
feet/min
Average gas temperature
°C
°F
Average gas pressure
mm Hg
in. Hg
Moisture (water vapor), % v/v
Dry gas mol. wt., g/g-mole (Ib/lb-mole)
Wet gas mol. wt., g/g-mole (Ib/lb-mole)
Carbon dioxide, % v/v dry basis
Oxygen, % v/v dry basis
Carbon monoxide, % v/v dry basis
Average isokinetic sampling variation, %
Gas sample volume
dry standard m3
dry standard ft3
Furnace no. 1
1
02/11/99
1130-2345
680
570
20,119
582
20,569
670
23,647
948
3,111
59
138
29.49
749
2.2
28.87
28.63
0.2
20.9
0.0
99.6
5.980
211.180
baghouse inlect duct
2
02/12/99
1015-2315
710
617
21,788
621
21,914
693
24,483
982
3,221
51
123
29.60
752
0.6
28.87
28.81
0.2
20.9
0.0
98.5
6.691
236.299
Furnace no. 1 baghouse outlet stack
1 2
02/11/99
1130-2345
700
697
24,631
713
25,183
775
27,376
728
2,388
42
108
29.59
752
2.2
2886
2863
0.2
20.9
0.0
101.0
5.069
179.014
02/12/99
1015-2315
750
728
25,698
734
25,923
762
26,917
716
2,348
29
84
29.70
754
0.9
28.87
28.77
0.2
20.9
0.0
100.1
5.620
198.466
.MRI-AED\R4951-03-O4-01 wpd
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-03
Section 3
Revision: 0
Date: 5/21/99
Page 11 of 14
Baghouse Inlet Duct
Amount in train (//g)
Run 1 Run 2
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene 1 1 .4 -
Anthracene
Benz[a]anthracene
Benzo[a]pyrene
Benzo[to]fluoranthene - -
Benzo[cj,/v]perylene - -
Benz[k]fluoranthene
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether - -
1-Chloronaphthalene 16.3
Chrysene
Dibenzofuran
Dibenz[a,fi]anthracene
Dibenzothiophene
Fluoranlhene
Fluorene
Hexachlorobenzene
lndeno(1 ,2,3-cd)pyrene
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
Gas
-
64.6
-
8.64
12.2
-
13.7
-
687
49.5
-
Sample Volume
-
39.6
-
6.49
7.53
-
-
-
180
28.5
-
(dscm)
Cone, (pg/dscm)
Run 1 Run 2
3.1
4.5
-
17.7
-
2.4
3.4
-
3.7
-
188.4
13.6
-
-
-
11.9
-
1.9
2.3
-
-
-
53.9
8.5
-
Emission Rate (Ib/hr)
Run 1 Run 2
7.26E-05
1.03E-04
-
4.10E-04
-
5.48E-05
7.76E-05
-
8.68E-05
-
4.36E-03
3.14E-04
—
;
-
2.54E-04
-
4.17E-05
4.84E-05
-
-
-
1.16E-03
1.83E-04
—
3.645 3.335
Gas Flow Rate
(dscm/min)
175
162
Baghouse Outlet Stack
Amount in train (/yg) Cone, (/yg/dscm) Emission Rate (Ib/hr)
Run 1 Run 2 Run 1 Run 2 Run 1 Run 2
9.61 - 3.4
10.3 8.84 3.6
— — —
40.3 24.5 14.1
— — —
— — —
- - -
12.0 - 4.2
- - -
- - -
471 275 164.7
34.1 23.6 11.9
— — —
2.861
6.93E-05
3.3 7.41 E-05 6.39E-05
— — -
9.1 2.91 E-04 1.77E-04
— — —
— — —
- -
8.63E-05
- - -
- - -
102.2 3.40E-03 1.99E-03
8.8 2.46E-04 1.70E-04
— — —
2.693
156 147
' The "-" symbol indicates that analyte levels were less than lowest calibration standard or that no calculation could be performed on an analyte at levels below lowest calibration standard.
MRI-AEDVRJ95I-03(M-OI
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-03
Section 3
Revision: 0
Date: 5/21/99
Page 12 of 14
1 Baghouse"
Baghouse Inlet Duct
Amount in train (fjg)
Run 1 Run 2
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Anthracene
Benz[a]anthracene
Benzo[a]pyrene
Benzo[t>]fluoranthene
Benzo[p,h,']perylene
Benzo[fr]fluoranthene
_
911
106
77.9
32.8
152
25.8
31.8
_
327
43.7
70.9
_b
930 b
189 b
202"
Cone, fc/g/dscm)
Run 1 Run 2
_
152.3
17.7
13.0
5.5
25.5
4.3
5.3
_
48.8
6.5
10.6
-
139
28.2
30.2
Emission Rate (Ib/hr)
Run 1 Run 2
_
1.15E-02
1.34E-03
9.83E-04
4.13E-04
1.92E-03
3.25E-04
4.00E-04
-
3.98E-03
5.32E-04
8.65E-04
-
1.13E-02
2.30E-03
2.47E-03
Amount in
Run 1
10.5
414
28.0
-
-
-
-
—
Baghouse
Outlet Stack
train (jjg) Cone, (/yg/dscm)
Run 2 Run 1 Run 2
2.1
741 81.6
5.5
-
— —
- -
- -
— —
-
131.9
-
-
—
-
-
—
Emission Rate(lb/hr)
Run 1 Run 2
1.90E-04
7.53E-03
5.09E-04
-
—
-
-
—
-
1 .27E-02
-
-
—
-
-
—
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether ___-_- ______
1 -Chloronaphthalene
Chrysene
Dibenzofuran
Dibenz[a,/i]anthracene
Dibenzothiophene
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Hexachlorobenzene
lndeno(1 ,2,3-cd)pyrene
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
Gas
-
109
165
-
27.8
316
142
—
36.0
3199
776
255
Sample Volume
29.0
207
279
95.1 b
30.0
685
230
27.7
327"
5148
1286
271
(dscm)
Gas Flow Rate
-
18.2
27.7
-
4.6
52.8
23.8
-
6.0
535.0
129.7
42.6
5.980
4.3
30.9
41.7
14.2
4.5
102.3
34.3
4.1
48.9
769.3
192.2
40.5
6.691
(dscm/min)
-
1 .37E-03
2.09E-03
-
3.51 E-04
3.98E-03
1.80E-03
-
4.54E-04
4.03E-02
9.78E-03
3.21 E-03
570
3.54E-04
2.52E-03
3.40E-03
1.16E-03
3.66E-04
8.35E-03
2.80E-03
3.38E-04
3.99E-03
6.28E-02
1.57E-02
3.30E-03
617
8.17
-
128
-
27
193
80
26.6
-
1934
543
35.0
1.6
-
173 25.3
-
5.2
59.2 38.0
147 15.7
5.2
-
3671 381.5
596 107.2
6.9
5.069
-
-
30.7
-
-
10.5
26.1
-
-
653.2
106
—
5.620
1.49E-04
-
2.33E-03
-
4.84E-04
3. 51 E-03
1.45E-03
4.84E-04
-
3.52E-02
9.88E-03
6.36E-04
697
-
-
2.96E-03
-
-
1.01 E-03
2.52E-03
-
-
6.29E-02
1 .02E-02
—
728
a The "-" symbol indicates that analyte levels were less than lowest calibration standard or that no calculation could be performed on an analyte at levels below
lowest calibration standard.
6 Internal standard outside acceptable range on original and dilution analyses.
MRI-ACD\R495\-OJ-04-0\
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-03
Section 3
Revision: 0
Date: 5/21/99
Page 13 of 14
Table 3-7. Semivolatile Organic Compound Emissions (Ib/ton of material processed) at Chip Dryer Baghouse"
Baghouse Inlet Duct
Amount in train (^/g)
Run 1 Run 2
Acenaphthene - -
Acenaphthylene 11.4
Anthracene
Benz[a]anthracene - -
Benzo[a]pyrene - -
Benzo[b]fluoranthene - -
Benzo[fif,/7,/]perylene - -
Benz[/c]fluoranthene - -
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
1-Chloronaphthalene 16.3
Chrysene
Dibenzofuran
-
64.6
-
39.6
Cone, (/yg/dscm)
Run 1 Run 2
3.1
4.5
-
17.7
-
_
11.9
3
5
2
Emission (Ib/ton)
Run 1 Run 2
.78E-05
38E-05
—
13E-04
-
—
1 .70E-04
Baghouse Outlet Stack
Amount in train (//g) Cone. Cug/dscm) Emission (Ib/ton)
Run 1 Run 2 Run 1 Run 2 Run 1 Run 2
9.61 - 3.4
10.3 8.84 3.6
_ _ _
40.3 24.5 14.1
3.61 E-05
3.3 3.85E-05
_ _
9.1 1.51E-04
4.27E-05
.
1.18E-04
Dibonz[a,h]anthracene ______ ______
Dibenzothiophene
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Hexachlorobenzene
8.64
12.2
-
13.7
6.49
7.53
-
-
2.4
3.4
-
3.7
1.9
2.3
—
—
2
4
4
85E-05
04E-05
_
51E-05
2.79E-05
3.23E-05
_
_
_ _ _
_ _ _
12.0 - 4.2
_ _ _
_ _
4.49E-05
— _
_
_
_
_
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene ______ ______
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
687
49.5
-
Gas Sample Volume
180
28.5
-
(dscm)
188.4
13.6
-
54.0
8.5
-
2
1
27E-03
64E-04
-
7.74E-03
1 .22E-04
-
3.645 3.335
Gas Flow Rate
(dscm/min)
RunTime (min)
Total
Weight of Material Processed
During
Run (tons)
175
210
6.727
162
210
5.236
471 275 164.7
34.1 23.6 11.9
- - -
2.861
102.2 1.77E-03
8.8 1.28E-04
_
2.693
156
210
6.727
1 .33E-03
1.14E-04
-
147
210
5.236
• The "-" symbol indicates that analyte levels were less than lowest calibration standard or that no calculation could be performed on an analyte at levels below lowest calibration standard.
MRI-ARD\R495I.O.V04-OI
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-03
Section 3
Revision: 0
Date: 5/21/99
Page 14 of 14
Table 3-8. Semivolatile Organic Compound Emissions (Ib/ton of material charged) at
Reverberatory Furnace No. 1 Baghouse"
Baghouse Inlet Duct
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Anthracene
Benz[a]anthracene
Benzo[a]pyrene
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
Benzo[g,/7,']perylene
Benzo[fr]fluoranthene
Amount
Run 1
-
911
106
77.9
32.8
152
25.8
31.8
in train (//g)
Run 2
-
327
43.7
70.9
_b
930"
189"
202 b
Cone, (fjg/dscm)
Run 1 Run 2
-
152.3
17.7
13.0
5.5
25.5
4.3
5.3
—
48.8
6.5
10.6
-
139
28.2
30.2
Emissions (Ib/ton)
Run 1 Run 2
_
2.32E-03
2.70E-04
1.99E04
8.35E-05
3.88E-04
6.58E-05
8.09E-05
_
8.08E-04
1.08E-04
1 .76E-04
—
2.30E-03
4.67E-04
5.01 E-04
Amount in
Run 1
10.5
414
28.0
_
_
_
_
_
Baghouse Outlet Stack
train (j/g) Cone, (pg/dscm)
Run 2 Run 1 Run 2
2.1
741 81.6
5.5
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
3
131.9 1
1
_
_
_
_
_
Emission (Ib/ton)
Run 1 Run 2
.85E-05
.52E-03
.03E-04
_
_
_
_
2.58E-03
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether -_-___ ______
1 -Chloronaphthalene
Chrysene
Dibenzofuran
Dibenz[a,/7]anthracene
Dibenzothiophene
Fluoranthene
rluorene
Hexachlorobenzene
lndeno(1 ,2,3-cd)pyrene
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
3yrene
Gas
-
109
165
-
27.8
316
142
-
36.0
3199
776
255
29.0
207
279
95.1 b
30.0
685
230
27.7
327 b
5148
1286
271
Sample Volume (dscm)
Gas Flow Rate
_
18.2
27.7
-
4.6
52.8
23.8
-
6.0
535.0
129.7
42.6
5.980
4.3
30.9
41.7
14.2
4.5
102.3
34.3
4.1
48.9
769.3
192.2
40.5
6.691
(dscm/min)
Melt (Cycle) Time (min)
Total Charge Weight
During Run (tons)
—
2.77E-04
4.22E-04
_
7.09E-05
8.05E-04
3.63E-04
-
9.17E-05
8.15E-03
1.98E-03
6.50E-04
570
750
61.84
7.18E-05
5.12E-04
6.91 E-04
2.36E-04
7.42E-05
1.69E-03
5.68E-04
6.86E-05
8.10E-04
1 .27E-02
3.18E-03
6.71 E-04
617
780
64.06
8.17
_
128
_
27
193
80
26.6
_
1934
543
35.0
1.6
_ _
173 25.3
_ _
5.2
59.2 38.0
147 15.7
5.2
_ _
3671 381.5
596 107.2
6.9
5.069
3
_
30.7 4
_
.01E-05
.71 E-04
_
6.00E-04
9.77E-05
10.5 7
.09E-04
26.1 2.93E-04
_ Q
78E-05
653.2 7.11E-03
106 2.00E-03
2.06E-04
5.11 E-04
„
_
1 .28E-02
2.07E-03
1.29E-04
5.620
697
750
61.84
728
780
64.06
" The "-" symbol indicates that analyte levels were less than lowest calibration standard or that no calculation could be performed on an analyte at levels below
lowest calibration standard.
b Internal standard outside acceptable range on original and dilution analyses.
MRI-AP.D\R495I-0.1-04-OI
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-03
Section 4
Revision 0
Date: 5/21/99
Page 1 of 4
Section 4.
Sampling, Analytical, and Process Data Collection
Procedures
The sampling, analytical, and process data collection procedures used for this test
project are described in this section. The published methods and other written procedures
used are cited here. Details providing clarification and any modifications to or deviations
from the published methods are presented in this section. Otherwise, the cited methods
were followed.
4.1 Sampling Procedures
The samples collected required the use of one sampling system at each of the four
sampling locations: an EPA Method 0010 isokinetic sampling train for POM and PAHs,
along with an integral EPA Method 3B integrated gas sampling apparatus for carbon
dioxide, and oxygen.
The following methods were employed in the use and operation of these sampling
trains and systems.
4.1.1 Sample and Velocity Traverses
Method 1 in Appendix A of 40 CFR 60 was used to establish sampling points at the
sampling locations for the isokinetic sampling trains. A check for absence of cyclonic flow
was conducted at the chip dryer source prior to the start of sampling. A cyclonic flow
check was not conducted at the reverbatory furnace (See Section 3.3.1 for more detail).
4.1.2 Determination of Gas Velocity and Volumetric Flow Rates
Method 2 in Appendix A of 40 CFR 60 was used to measure gas velocities and
volumetric flow rates with Type S pilot tubes that are components of the isokinetic
sampling trains. Pitot tubes meeting the dimensional specifications in the method were
used. Pitot tube coefficients were adjusted for blockage in the gas stream caused by the
probe assemblies used during sampling. An average adjusted coefficient for each such pitot
tube was calculated in a spreadsheet using the procedures cited in Method 2.
MRI-AED\R495I-03-(W-0! up
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-03
Section 4
Revision: 0
Date: 5/21/99
Page 2 of 4
Pitot tube blowback modules using pressurized air were incorporated into the pressure
measurement systems used at the inlet locations for manual purging of any accumulated
moisture and paniculate matter from the pilot tubes during a test run to eliminate any need
to disconnect lines during purging. Each pressure measurement system, i.e., pitot tube,
pressure lines, blowback module (where used) in measurement mode, and inclined
manometers, were leak checked as a unit before and after each test run.
An aneroid barometer calibrated against a mercury barometer was used to measure
atmospheric pressure at the sampling locations.
Determination of dry gas molecular weight and moisture content of the gas is described
below.
4.1.3 Determination of Dry Gas Molecular Weight
Method 3B in Appendix A of 40 CFR 60 was used to collect multi-point, integrated
gas bag samples for dry gas molecular weight determination simultaneous with the
isokinetic sampling. The integrated gas sampling apparatus that were used to collect the
samples were components of the isokinetic sampling trains. Gas samples were extracted at
a constant rate from the exhaust of an isokinetic sampling train just upstream from the
outlet of the dry gas meter outlet orifice. MRI has determined through investigation that
the impinger contents of a Method 0010 train do not cause interferences (e.g., loss of
carbon dioxide) during sample collection that are detectable during analysis by Orsat
analyzer. Also, at the start of isokinetic sampling, the entire Method 0010 train was purged
with sampled gas before integrated gas sampling began. Each integrated gas sampling
apparatus was leak checked before and after each test run. The tubing at the connection to
the orifice was closed off, the integrated sampling apparatus pump was turned on, and the
integrated sampling apparatus flow control valve was fully opened. No flow or bubbling at
the tubing outlet (i.e., where the gas sample bag would be connected during sampling), that
was submerged just below the surface of some water, was used to indicate that the
apparatus was leak-free.
Gas samples were analyzed with an Orsat analyzer. Since gas composition at all
sampling locations was expected to remain relatively constant during a test run, only one
bag per train was expected to be used. However, due to the extended sampling time and the
sample flow rate used during run 1 at the reverbatory furnace locations, two bags were
required to prevent overfilling bags.
MRI AED\R4951-03-W-01 wpd
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-03
Section 4
Revision: 0
Date: 5/21/99
Page 3 of 4
4.1.4 Determination of Moisture Content
Method 4 in Appendix A of 40 CFR 60 incorporated as part of Method 0010 was used
to determine the moisture (water vapor) content of the gas streams. Moisture collected
during sampling was determined gravimetrically from the difference between the initial and
final weights of all of the impingers in a train, including the resin cartridge.
4.1.5 Sampling for POM and PAHs
Method 0010, "Modified Method 5 Sampling Train," in "Test Methods for Evaluating
Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical (SW-846)" was used to collect samples to be analyzed for
POM and PAHs.
Quartz nozzles and borosilicate glass probe liners were used. The internal surface of
the compression fittings used for connecting nozzles to probe liners are permanently coated
with abrasion-resistant Teflon® to prevent sample gas contact with the stainless steel.
Heat traced, Vi-inch O.D. with Vb- inch wall Teflon® tubing was used as a sample
transfer line (STL) between the probe liner outlet and the filter holder inlet in the trains
used at the inlet locations where vertical traverses were necessary. The use of a STL
allowed separation of the probe from the filter/impinger box to facilitate sampling in the
horizontal ducts where no overhead supports for a fully assembled sampling train existed.
A STL was also used at the furnace baghouse outlet because of safety concerns regarding
the use of a fully assembled train at that location. A glass coupling was used to connect the
STL tubing to the probe liner outlet while the other end of the tube was connected directly
to the filter holder inlet. The STL was maintained at 248 ± 25 °F during sampling.
Filter supports in the filter holders were Teflon®-coated, stainless steel screening.
Quartz fiber filters having the same specifications described in the method were used. Each
cartridge (sorbent trap) was loaded with approximately 65 grams of XAD-2 resin.
During run 1 of the test project, one field blank train was set up, operated (i.e., heated
and cooled as required, but with the nozzle tip capped), leak checked, and recovered in the
same manner as the source sampling trains. This train was located on top of the chip
baghouse near the outlet sampling location during operation.
MRI-AED\R4951-03-04-01
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-03
Section 4
Revision: 0
Date: 5/21/99
Page 4 of 4
Sample recovery procedures were followed as specified in the method, i.e., using a
mixture of methanol and methylene chloride (1:1 v/v) for rinsing train components. The
condensate collected in the impingers was not analyzed. The acidic nature of the
condensate (i.e, pH ranging from 1 to 5) was not expected to retain the analytes intact
should any actually break through the sorbent cartridge. However, all analytes of interest
were expected to be retained in the sorbent cartridge. All samples were stored and shipped
cold at water ice temperature (i.e., in ice chests with double-bagged ice checked daily by
the sample custodian and in a cold storage room once received by the Laboratory Sample
Custodian).
4.2 Analytical Procedures
The sample components recovered from the Method 0010 trains (i.e., XAD-2 resin and
filter) were combined and extracted in the laboratory using Soxhlet extraction. The
procedure for extraction involved placing the XAD-2 resin and filter samples in the Soxhlet
apparatus, spiking with surrogate standards, and extracting with methylene chloride for a
minimum of 16 hours.
The train rinses were extracted with methylene chloride using a separatory funnel.
Following extraction, the methylene chloride was concentrated to a volume of 1- to 5-mL
and combined with the corresponding XAD-2/filter extract for each train. The combined
extract was concentrated to a final volume of 1.0 mL.
The extracts were analyzed according to the procedures specified in Method 8270C,
"Semivolatile Organic Compounds by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS),"
in "Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical (SW-846)."
This analysis procedure included the separation of semivolatile target analytes (e.g.,
POM and PAHs) using gas chromatography followed by detection by mass spectrometry.
No deviations from this procedure were made.
4.3 Process Data Collection
Process operating parameters were monitored and recorded by the facility, EPA, and
MRI personnel. This data is given in Appendix E.
MR]-A£D\R 4951-03-04-01 »pd
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-03
Section 5
Revision: 0
Date: 5/21/99
Page 1 of 8
Section 5.
Quality Assurance (QA)/Quality Control (QC)
Activities
The QA/QC procedures and QC requirements for this test project are summarized in
this section. The QA/QC procedures and requirements specified in the EPA methods and
MRI standard operating procedures were used. These procedures include, but are not
limited to, (1) sampling equipment calibrations, (2) procedural elements of the methods,
such as leak checks, proper traversing, placement of sampling probes, verification of the
integrity of metering systems prior to the start of sampling, etc., and (3) the use of QC
samples and analytical procedures such as reagent blank samples, laboratory control
samples, and surrogate spiking. The performance and results of all QC procedures were
recorded on appropriate forms, data sheets, or in field and laboratory notebooks as
appropriate.
5.1 Equipment Calibration
QC procedures and the acceptability limits for sampling equipment calibrations are
presented in Table 5-1. Calibration data sheets and equipment condition checklists used
during calibration are provided in Appendix C. Equipment used for analysis of samples
was calibrated according to the procedures in Methods 0010 and 8270C and the appropriate
MRI equipment books.
5.2 Emission Measurements Quality Objectives
Specific QC procedures were followed to ensure the continuous production of useful
and valid data. Table 5-2 presents a summary of specific criteria used for assessing overall
emission measurement data quality along with the results of these determinations. The
analytical narrative report included in Appendix D includes all results shown here.
5.2.1 Surrogate Recoveries
Lab surrogate recoveries are shown in Table 5-3 and field surrogate recoveries are
shown in Table 5-4. As indicated in these tables, recoveries were within the data quality
objectives, with one minor exception. The 2-Fluorobiphenyl recovery for run no. 2 of the
furnace baghouse inlet was slightly higher than the recommended criteria.
MRI-AED\R495l-03-04-OI wpd
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-03
Section 5
Revision: 0
Date: 5/21/99
Page 2 of 8
5.2.2 Blank and Check Sample Results
Laboratory method blank and blank train results are provided in Table 5-5. As
indicated in the table, results for all analytes were less than the lowest calibration standard.
Check samples include a laboratory control sample and a independent check standard.
Results are shown in Table 5-6. As indicated in the table, all recovery results met the
quality control criteria.
5.3 Data Audit
A data audit was conducted to evaluate the analytical data generated during this work
assignment. The data were evaluated against the quality objectives for the measurement
process which were presented in the QAPP (and amendment) and the specified test
methods. The analytical data generated for this work assignment were audited by MRI's
QA unit. The audit of the analytical data showed no systematic errors in the data
measurement process. These data met the measurement quality objectives for this work
assignment.
5.4 Data Assessment
An assessment of the overall quality of the data generated for this work assignment
was conducted. The data assessment included a review of the sample collection data,
preparation and analysis data, including calibration, surrogate recovers, laboratory control
spike sample, and independent check sample analyzed with the samples. The data
generated for this report are traceable and of known and acceptable quality.
MR1-AED\R4951-03-O4-01 v.pJ
-------
Emission Test Repoit
EMC WA-2-03
Section 5
Revision: 0
Date: 5/21/99
Page 3 of 8
Table 5-1. Calibration Procedures and QC Criteria for Method 0010 Sampling Equipment
Parameter
1. Sampling nozzle
2. Metering system —
volume
3. Gas meter temperature
4. Gas stream (stack)
temperature sensor
(thermocouple)
5 Final impinger outlet
temperature sensor
(thermocouple)
6. Filter temperature
sensor (thermocouple)
7 Aneroid barometer
8. Type S pitot tube
Calibration technique
Measure 3 diameters to
nearest 0.001 in. and average
measurements
Compare with calibrated
critical orifices, 40 CFf?60,
Appendix A, Method 5,
Section 7.2
Compare to mercury-in-glass
thermometer
Heated block monitored with
potentiometer thermocouple
system
Compare to mercury-m-glass
thermometer
Compare to mercury-in-glass
thermometer
Compare to mercury
barometer
Measure dimensions
according to 40 CFR60,
Appendix A,
Method 2 for baseline
coefficient of 0 R4
Reference standard
Micrometer
Calibrated critical orifice
ASTM thermometer
LIST traceable potentiometer
thermocouple system
ASTM thermometer
ASTM thermometer
Mercury column barometer
Micrometer and angle finder
Acceptance limit ] Frequency
Difference between high and
low measurements, i 0.004 in.
Difference between individual
calibration factor values and
average value, <, ± 0.02
s ± 5% of initial calibration
factor
i. ±5°F difference from
reference
Difference of < ±1 .5% of
minimum absolute stack
temperature from absolute
reference temperature
(unsaturated gas streams); s
±1 °F difference from reference
Jsaturated gas streams)
•; ±2°F difference from
reference
s ±5°F difference from
reference
<, ±0.1 in. Hg difference from
reference
Meets dimensional criteria
specified in Method 2,
Section 4. 1 and Figures 2-2
and 2-3
Prior to sampling
Prior to test series
After test series
Before and after test series
Before and after test series
Before and after test series
Before and after test series
Before and after test series
Before and after test series
Objective Mef
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Note 1
Note 1: Pitot tube M-103 used at Chip Dryer Inlet for Run No. 1 was slightly damaged after run.
II1-01 (M 01
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-03
Section 5
Revision: 0
Date: 5/21/99
Page 4 of 8
Table 5-2. Criteria for Emission Measurement Data
Test
parameters
POM and
PAHs
Moisture
(water vapor)
Moisture
pressure
temperature
velocity
O2, CO2, and
CO by Orsat
Matrix
Method
0010 train
samples
Impmger
contents
Gas
stream
being
measured
Gas bag
samples
Method of
determination
Field surrogates
(spiked XAD in lab
during preparation of
sampling train)
Lab surrogates
Laboratory reagent
blank
Laboratory control
sample (blank
reagents spiked with
independent standard
of native POM / PAHs)
Independent (second
source) check
standard (EPA or
certified POM / PAH
reference standard)
Balance calibration
check with calibration
weight
Secondary technical
review of field test data
and equipment
calibration records
relative to EPA
Methods 1 -5
Analysis of ambient air
Triplicate analysis of
ban samnlRS
Frequency
Each field
sample and
blank
Each field
sample and
blank
One XAD/filter
One spiked
XAD/filter
After initial
calibration
Prior to initial
and final
gravimetric
determinations
and whenever
balance drift is
apparent
Ongoing during
testing
Once prior to
bag sample
analysis
Each bag
samole
Accuracy objective
40% to 130%
recovery
18% to 137%,
depending upon
surrogate (see
APP Amendment
Record No. 1)
Levels less than
lowest calibration
standard
50% to 150%
recovery
80% to 120%
difference
±01g
Validated by
meeting posttest
equipment
calibration
tolerances
±0.2%t by volume
for ambient air
oxygen
NA
Precision
objective
60% RSD
between
pooled
samples
40% RSD
between
samples
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA, but
multiple
test runs
may be
used as
indication
of overall
operation
variability
Method 3B
criteria
Method 3B
criteria
Objective
met?
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
MRI-AEDVIU951-03-04-01
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-03
Section 5
Revision: 0
Date: 5/21/99
Page 5 of 8
Table 5-3. Individual Semivolatile Laboratory Surrogate Recoveries (%)
Chip dryer
baghouse inlet
Run:
Sampled:
2-Fluorophenol
Phenol-d5
2-Chlorophenol-c/4
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4
Nitrobenzene-d5
2-Fluorobiphenyl
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
Terphenyl-d14
Run 1
2/9/99
75.3
90.4
83.7
72.8
77.3
87.8
97.3
88.0
Run 2
2/9/99
78.1
98.5
87.5
75.6
73.9
92.7
107
94.2
Chip dryer
baghouse outlet
Run 1
2/9/99
74.9
89.7
88.9
77.8
108
93.9
81.7
90.1
Run 2
2/9/99
79.1
81.4
88.5
72.1
99.2
91.2
90.7
92.5
Furnace
baghouse inlet
Run 1
2/11/99
71.1
81.7
96.6
85.7
91.2
106
103
103
Run 2
2/12/99
65.1
80.0
93.1
85.8
118
124a
117
126
Furnace
baghouse outlet
Run 1
2/11/99
69.8
62.2
59.6
70.4
119
89.7
114
87.6
Run 2
2/12/99
72.6
80.8
91.2
82.0
108
103
93.3
109
Blank
train
NA
NA
68.5
80.4
75.7
71.2
81.6
82.9
111
90.1
RSD (%)
NA
NA
6
13
13
8
17
12
12
13
Method
blank
NA
NA
69.1
76.7
75.6
72.8
76.3
83.2
104
87.4
LCS
NA
NA
64.41
76.2
72.0
69.2
73.3
81.8
103
95.2
NA = Not applicable.
a Exceed recovery guideline upper limit of 115%.
MRI-AEO\R4W-(n-Q4-OI wpd
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-03
Section 5
Revision: 0
Date: 5/21/99
Page 6 of 8
Table 5-4. Individual Field Surrogate Recoveries for Semivolatiles
Field surrogates, %R
Sample no.
1001-1003
1006-1008
2001-2003
2006-2008
1011-1013
1016-1018
2011-2013
2016-2018
1026-1028
MB
LCS
Location
Chip Dryer Baghouse Inlet
Chip Dryer Baghouse Outlet
Chip Dryer Baghouse Inlet
Chip Dryer Baghouse Outlet
Furnace Baghouse Inlet
Furnace Baghouse Outlet
Furnace Baghouse Inlet
Furnace Baghouse Outlet
Blank Train
Sample average recovery
Sample standard deviation
RSD%
NA
NA
Run
1
1
2
2
1
1
2
2
NA1
NA
NA
Date
sampled
2/9/99
2/9/99
2/9/99
2/9/99
2/11/99
2/11/99
2/12/99
2/12/99
2/2/99
NA
NA
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-03
Section 5
Revision: 0
Date: 5/21/99
Page 7 of 8
Table 5-5. Laboratory Method Blank, And Blank Train Results for Semivolatiles
Detection limit 1
Analyte total fjg
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Anthracene
Benz(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(£>)fluoranthene
Benzo(<7A/)perylene
Benzo(/()fluoranthene
4-Bromophenyl-phenylether
1 -Chloronaphthalene
Chrysene
Dibenzofuran
Dibenz(a,/7)anthracene
Dibenzothiophene
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Hexachlorobenzene
lndeno(1 ,2,3-cd)pyrene
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
Method blank
total PQ
ND2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Blank train
total fjg
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Footnotes: Only those numbers indicated in table are applicable.
' Detection limit is the lowest calibration standard.
2 ND = Not detected, less than the lowest calibration standard.
MRI-AEDUU95I.03-04-OI
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-03
Section 5
Revision: 0
Date: 5/21/99
Page 8 of 8
Table 5-6. Laboratory Control Spike and Independent Check Sample
Recoveries for Semivolatiles
Analyte
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Anthracene
Benz(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(jb)fluoranthene
Benzo(g,/v)perylene
Benzo(/r)fluoranthene
4-Bromophenyl-phenylether
1 -Chloronaphthalene
Chrysene
Dibenzofuran
Dibenz(a,ft)anthracene
Dibenzothiophene
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Hexachlorobenzene
lndeno(1 ,2,3-cd)pyrene
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Pvrene
LCS recovery %R
93.6
94.4
101
104
102
105
104
103
99.2
87.2
105
92.8
107
NA1
106
96.8
101
107
83.6
100
104
ICS recovery %R
103
101
105
99
102
103
104
110
102
104
101
100
104
100
96
103
98
102
100
102
101
1 NA = Not applicable.
MRI-AED\R4951-03-04-01 »pd
-------
Appendix A
Sample Tracking Data
MR!-AED\R495!.O.VO4-01 »[
-------
List of Samples for Analysis
Emission Sample
Chip dryer baghouse inlet
duct - Run 1
Chip dryer baghouse
outlet stack - Run 1
Chip dryer baghouse inlet
duct - Run 2
Chip dryer baghouse
outlet stack - Run 2
Furnace baghouse inlet
duct - Run 1
Furnace baghouse outlet
stack - Run 1
Furnace baghouse inlet
duct - Run 2
Furnace baghouse outlet
stack - Run 2
Field Blank Train
Reagent Blanks: Methanol
Methylene chloride
Filter
XAD cartridge
Water
Sample
Number
1001
1002
1003
1004
1006
1007
1008
1009
2001
2002
2003
2004
2006
2007
2008
2009
1011
1012
1013
1014
1016
1017
1018
1019
2011
2012
2013
2014
2016
2017
2018
2019
1026
1027
1028
1021
1022
1023
1024
1025
Sample Component
Train rinses
Filter
XAD cartridge
Condensate
Train rinses
Filter
XAD cartridge
Condensate
Train rinses
Filter
XAD cartridge
Condensate
Train rinses
Filter
XAD cartridge
Condensate
Train rinses
Filter
XAD cartridge
Condensate
Train rinses
Filter
XAD cartridge
Condensate
Train rinses
Filter
XAD cartridge
Condensate
Train rinses
Filter
XAD cartridge
Condensate
Train rinses
Filter
XAD cartridge
NA
End of Run
02/09/99
1:45 p.m.
02/09/99
1:45 p.m.
02/09/99
7:15 p.m.
02/09/99
7:15 p.m.
02/1 1/99
11:45 p.m.
02/11/99
1 1:45 p.m.
02/12/99
11:15 p.m.
02/12/99
11:15 p.m.
02/02/99
7:15 p.m.
NA
PM = paniculate matter
-------
D CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
[^SAMPLE TRACEABILITY RECORD
Container (Cooler) No. "X/)D&
Page / of / Transfer No.
Checked by (Initials)/Date
Lock or Seal Intact (Yes or No)/Time
MOO10 XAD CARTRIDGE
'SCRAP DRYER BH INLET SAMPLE
For disposal call: J. SURMAN
4951. O3 Gulp Al JL O O ©
• M0010 XAD CARTRIDGE
c;rRAP HRYFR BH OUTLET SAMPLE
4951.03 Gulp Al JLOS2Q
MOO1O XAD CARTRIDGE
For disposal call: J. SURMAN
nJ.UWti.bJ ntibtiArtCri J.NtaTliUTE
Rejjnflyished By; Received By:
S///bwts/// nl^^/W:
//^ ' u
Field Sample Custodian:
/
,
\S r^^
Remarks:
\/ fi*V
Remarks:
^ ^Vw<^
Remarks
Remarks:
Remarks.
Remarks:
Remarks:
Remarks'
Remarks.
Remarks:
Remarks.
Sample Transfers:
Date Time No.
02j<&}U /6/v 1
2
3
4
Storage Requirements:
E^lce water, < 4°C
d] Dry ice .
EH Room Temp., < 26°C
CU Other:
Reason for Transfer:
-lZsz*r?& -<***bAer>
93-4 SEV surmwksht 020293
-------
D CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
EXAMPLE TRACEABILITY RECORD
Container (Cooler) No. X0JOT
Page J of / Transfer No.
Checked by (Initials)/Date
Lock or Seal Intact (Yes or No)/Time
4951.03 Gulp Al 1.02:4:
M0010 XAD CARTRIDGE
FIELD REAGENT BLANK
4951.03 Gulp Al J. O Jl C3
M0010 XAD CARTRIDGE
. FURNACE BH INLET SAMPLE
4951.03 Gulp Al JL O 1 S
MOO10 XAD CARTRIDGE
FURNACE BH OUTLET SAMPLE
For disposal call: J. SURMAN
MIDWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE
Rejinqujshed By: Received By:
^^^// nb tfL**r//H&r
/ / /
Field Sample Custodian:
J
,
v/ /-w<-
Remarks:
V/ ff**-s
Remarks.
I' i*Vi^X_
Remarks
Remarks
Remarks:
Remarks
Remarks.
Remarks
Remarks
Remarks
Remarks-
Sample Transfers:
Date Time No.
PZZ/JS'JW' ;&£>£ 1
2
3
4
Storage Requirements:
EMce water, < 4°C
Q Dry ice
CD Room Temp., < 26°C
CD Other:
Reason for Transfer:
-Tojsvvtecu* ^*>;?~
93-4 SEV surmwkshl 020292
-------
C] CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
EXAMPLE TRACEABILITY RECORD
Container (Cooler) No. ,X<#££
Page / of / Transfer No.
Checked by (Initials)/Date
Lock or Seal Intact (Yes or No)/Time
4951. O3 Gulp Al Z2OO&
M0010 XAD CARTRIDGE
SCRAP DRYER BH OUTLET SAMPLE
4951.03 Gulp Al 2OOC3
M001O XAD CARTRIDGE
SCRAP DRYER BH INLET SAMPLE
4951.03 Gulp Al Z2CH.CB
M0010 XAD CARTRIDGE
FURNACE BH INLET SAMPLE
4951. O3 Gulp Al SOI. &
M001O XAD CARTRIDGE
FURNACE BH OUTLET SAMPLE
For disposal call: J. SURMAN
MIDWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE
ReNjTC,ui?hed By: Received By:
////%wr*~,/7, ?ti,. fL^A^fiJL
/ / / ' ^
Field Sample Custodian:
/
^
^Aw-
Storage Requirements: •
H'fce water, < 4°C
CH Dry ice
CZl Room Temp., < 26°C
d Other:
Remarks:
L/^VVW«-
Remarks:
vX^^vO
Remarks
\Su»t>
-------
D CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
EXAMPLE TRACEABILITY RECORD
Container (Cooler) No. &/ tfJavkJ
Paqe / Of / Transfer No.
Checked by (Initials)/Date
Lock or Seal Intact (Yes or No)/Time
4951. O3 Gulp Al 1 ri *^> *=.
MOOIO TRAIN RINSES
BLANK TRAIN SAMPLE
4951.03 Gulp Al J_O2*7
MOOIO FILTER
BLANK_ TRAIN SAMPLE
^3D1 . UJ l^U-Lp A J. _1_ \ — 1 ^L _l_
MOOIO METHANOL
TTTTT1 n PFAnTTMT ni AWW
AQ^I m r1** i ^ AT -i i—\ *—^» +—*
' MOOIO METHYLENE CHLORIDE
FTtTJ n RPAPiPMT BT AMV
^irJDl . U J UUJ.p fti -L. \ — » ^£. *^i
MOOIO FILTER
C*TC*I n pcArjiTMT ni AWK
4951. O3 Gulp Al 1O2S
MOOIO ASTM TYPE II WATER
. FIELD REAGENT BLANK
For disposal call: J. SURMAN
MIDWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE
Relinquished By: Received By:
^/4^^-^// nJ« T^/MAr
/ '- ' ;£^ ^
2
3
4
Storage Requirements:
B^lce water, < 4°C
CD Dry ice
CD Room Temp., < 26°C
CD Other:
Reason for Transfer:
^>«^^ &,J*vS/i?~
93-4 SEV sormwksht 020293
-------
D CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
EXAMPLE TRACEABILITY RECORD
Container (Cooler) No.
Page /_ of 3
Checked by (Initials)/Date
Lock or Seal Intact (Yes or No)/Time
Transfer No.
Field Sample Custodian.-
Storage Requirements:
EB^ce water, <, 4°C
CD Dry ice
CD Room Temp., < 26°C
CD Other:
Remarks:
Remarks:
Remarks.
4951.03 Gulp Al 1OO1
MOOIO TRAIN RINSES
JJCRAP^PRYJSR BH INLET SAMPLE
4951. O3 Gulp Al 1OO2
MOOIO FILTER
SCRAP DRYER BH INLET SAMPLE
4951.O3 Gulp Al 1 OO4
MOOIO CONDENSATE
SCRAP DRYER BH INLET SAMPLE
4951.03 Gulp Al ^2.0 O 1
MOOiO TRAIN RINSES I
.SCRAP DRYER BH INLET .SAMPLE
4951. O3 Gulp Al 2OO2
MQO1O FILTER
c;r.RAP._DRYER,. BH .INLET__SAMPLE
4951. O3 Gulp Al :2OO^
MOOIO CONDENSATE
SCRAP DRYER BH INLET SAMPLE
/
Remarks
Remarks:
4951. O3 Gulp Al 1O11
MOOIO TRAIN RINSES
FURNACE BH INLET SAMPLE
4951. O3 Gulp Al 1.01:2
MOOIO FILTER
FURNACE BH INLET SAMPLE
4951.03 Gulp Al 1 O 1-1
MOOIO CONDENSATE
FURNACE BH INLET SAMPLE
«
Remarks.
I
Remarks'
V
Remarks:
1 1.
4951.O3 Gulp Al
MOOIO TRAIN RINSES
_KLU5MACC RH
4951. O3 Gulp Al SOI
MOOIO FILTER
FURNACE BH INLET SAMPLE
For disposal call: J.SURMAN
MIDWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE
Remarks.
Remarks:
Relinquished By:
Received By:
Sample Transfers:
Date
Time
No.
Reason for Transfer:
7
93-4 SEV surmwksht 020293
-------
D CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
[FSAMPLE TRACEABILITY RECORD
Container (Cooler) No. J?££r?)e.-&
Paqe -x? Of **- Transfer No.
Checked by (Initials)/Date
Lock or Seal Intact (Yes or No)/Time
4951.03 Gulp Al SOJL-l
MOO10 CQNDENSATE
FURNACE BH INLET SAMPLE
For disposal call: J. SURMAN
MIDWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE
Relinquished By: Received By:
s^//L^//*nl ^L^'^
/ y ' f (/'
Field Sample Custodian:
)
\/ /Vj2x
Storage Requirements:
Bice water, < 4°C
CU Dry ice
CH Room Temp., < 26°C
d Other:
Remarks: ^ ^^
Remarks:
Remarks-
Remarks-
Remarks.
Remarks.
Remarks
Remarks-
Remarks-
Remarks
Remarks.
Sample Transfers:
Date
ofiMW
Time
^^
No.
1
2
3
4
Reason for Transfer:
•^ S&pkcts**/:**
93-4 SEV surmwksht 020293
-------
D CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
EXAMPLE TRACEABILITY RECORD
Container (Cooler) No.
Page J of
Transfer No.
Checked by (Initials)/Date
Lock or Seal Intact (Yes or No)/Time
Field Sample Custodian:
I
Storage Requirements:
QZr7ce water, < 4°C
CD Dry ice
O Room Temp., <26°C
CH Other.
4951.03 Gulp Al 1OO&
MQQ1O TRAIN RINSES
SCRAP DRYER BH OUTLET SAMPLE
4951.03 Gulp Al JL O O V
M001O FILTER
SCRAP DRYER BH OUTLET SAMPLE
4951.03 Gulp Al JL O O-3»
MOO1O CONDENSATE
SCRAP DRYER BH OUTLET SAMPLE
4951.03 Gulp Al 2 O O <£>
MOO10 TRAIN RINSES
SCRAP DRYER BH OUTLET SAMPLE-
4951. O3 Gulp Al 2 O O V
MQ01O FILTER
SCRAP DRYER BH OUTLET SAMPLE
4951.03 Gulp Al 2
MOO10 CONDENSATE
SCRAP DRYER BH OUTLET SAMPLE
4951.03 Gulp Al JL O JL &
M0010 TRAIN RINSES
FURNACE BH OUTLET SAMPLE
4951.03 Gulp Al JL O 1 "7
MOO1O FILTER
FURNACE BH OUTLET SAMPLE
4951. O3 Gulp Al Ju O 1 <3
MQO1O CQNDENSATE
FURNACE BH OUTLET SAMPLE
4951. O3 Gulp Al 2 O 1 &
M0010 TRAIN RINSES
^FURNACE BH OUTLET SAMPLE_
4951. O3 Gulp Al 2 O JL V
MOO10 FILTER
FURNACE BH OUTLET SAMPLE
Far disposal call: J.SURMAN
MIDWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE
Remarks:
Remarks:
Remarks-
Remarks:
Remarks
Remarks:
By:
Received By:
Remarks.
Remarks:
Remarks
Remarks:
Remarks.
Sample Transfers:
Date
Time
No.
Reason for Transfer:
/ ''
93-4 SEV surmwksht 020293
-------
D CHAIN OF CUSTI
EXAMPLE TRACE
Container (Cooler)
Page .jf? of <&
Ch«
Lock or Seal 1
4951.03 Gulp 1
MOO10 CONDENSE
FURNACE BH OU'
For disposal c
MIDWEST RESEAI
DDY RECORD
ABILITY RECORD
Transfer No.
jcked by (Initials)/Date
ritact (Yes or No)/Time
M r201^
^TE
FLET SAMPLE
sail: J.SURMAN
?CH INSTITUTE
Relinquished By:
/2fa»^.d
/ ,-V ' /
Received By:
^Wx. 7^W*v>7 f^-j^
Field Sample Custodian: .
Ja/^?^ S^^/^y^
/
^ w\tjf*- —
Storage Requirements:
EJ3^fce water, < 4°C
CD Dry ice
CD Room Temp., < 26°C
CD Other:
Remarks: U i n
Remarks:
Remarks.
Remarks.
Remarks.
Remarks
Remarks-
Remarks"
Remarks.
Remarks.
Remarks.
Sample Transfers:
Date
o*J&)99
Time
/£Zp
No.
1
2
3
4
Reason for Transfer:
C£>a^ coosW/P-
93-4 SEV surmwkshl 020293
-------
Code: MRI-5003
Revision: 1
Effective: 3/27/98
Page: 8 of 17
SAMPLE RECEIPT CHECKLIST
MRI Project No. H^S'f -° 3 ~° Y
Samples Received by: / csu^-f f ~-/^ r~*->, Date:
Airbill No. f^ I r\ _ Chain-of-Custody No.
Airbill present? Yes Mo ~) Chain-of-Custody present? (Yes) No
Shipping container intact? (Vesy No Container type C*
Custody seals present? Yes wo) Seals intact? Yes fNb) Seal Location:
C-O-C properly filled out? Yes No Does C-O-C indicate sample type? (Yes) No
Ice packs oi(icejrozen? (Yesy No Samples cold? (Yes No Temperature °C:
' "
C ")
Sample containers intact? ffes) No Labels permanently affixed? C^esX No
@^-"~^\
Container type indicated? f^s) No
^s—-^
Are all samples properly labeled and accounted for? (Yes No
Are samples stored as indicated by the project leader? £es) No
Is the C-O-C filled out completely, signed, and dated? ^es) No
******
If pH check upon receipt is required, indicate where it is recorded. f
Sample storage location:
COMMENTS
MRJ-QA\MRI-5003.DOC
-------
Sample Master LI MS
Sample Login Report
Customer Name: EPA / EMC Option 1
Project ID: 4951
Order Comment: Hand delivered to sample control by J. Surman 2/15/99.
Order ID: 990200012
Order Date: 2/16/99
Page: 1 of 3
MR! Sample ID
99000449
99000450
9900045 1
99000452
99000453
99000454
99000455
99000456
99000457
99000458
99000459
99000460
99000461
99000462
9900046.1
99000464
Customer Sample ID
1003
Dryer BH Inlet
1008
Oiycr lillOullct
1028
Blank Train
1024
Field Reagent Bile
1013
Fum BH Inlet
1018
Furn BH Outlet
2008
Dryer BH Outlet
2003
Dryer BH Inlet
2013
Furnace BH Inlet
2018
Furnace BH Outlet
1026
Train Rinses
1027
Filter
1021
Melhanol
1022
Methylene Chloride
1023
Filler
1025
ASTM Type II Water
Matrix
Air
Air
Air
Air
Air
Air
Air
Air
Air
Air
Liquid
Air
Liquid
Liquid
Air
Liquid
Quantity Date Collected
1 2/9/99 12 00AM
1 2/9/99 1 2 00 AM
1 2/2/99 12 00 AM
1 2/9/99 12 00 AM
1 2/11/99 1200AM
1 2/1 1/99 1200AM
1 2/9/99 12 00 AM
1 2/9/99 1200AM
1 2/12/99 1200AM
1 2/12/99 1200AM
1 2/2/99 12 00 AM
1 2/2/99 12-00 AM
1 2/2/99 1 2.00 AM
,
i 1 2/2/99 12 00 AM
1 2/2/99 12.00 AM
1 2/2/99 1200AM
Date Received Test
2/15/99 9 44 AM (esl_smv
2/1 5/99 9 44 AM tcst.smv
2/1 5/99 9 44 AM test_smv
2/1 5/99 9 44 AM lest_smv
2/1 5/99 9 44 AM tesl_smv
2/15/99944 AM tcsl_smv
2/15/999.44 AM tcsl_smv
2/15/99 9 44 AM tes(_snw
2/15/99 9 44 AM tesl_smv
2/15/99 9 44 AM tesl_smv
2/15/999.44 AM tcst_smv
2/1 5/99 9 44 AM test_smv
2/15/999.44 AM test_smv
2/1 5/99 9 44 AM test_smv
2/15/999.44 AM tcst_smv
2/15/99 9 44 AM test_smv
Test Group Method Due Dale
3/1 5/99 9 44 00
3/15/9994400
3/15/9994400
3/15/99944 00
3/15/99944 00
3/15/99 9 44 00
3/15/9994400
3/15/9994400
3/15/9994400
3/15/9994400
3/15/999.4400
3/15/999:4400
3/15/999-4400
3/15/99944 00
-------
Sample Master LIMS
Sample Login Report
Customer Name: EPA / EMC Option 1
Project ID: 4951
Order Comment: Hand delivered to sample control by J. Surman 2/15/99.
Order ID: 990200012
Order Date: 2/16/99
Page: 2 of 3
MKI Sample II) Customer Sample II) Matrix
Quantity Dale Collected
Date Received
Test
Test Group Method
Due Date
99000465
99000466
99000467
99000468
99000469
99000470
9900047 1
99000472
99000473
99000474
99000475
99000476
99000477
99000478
99000479
99000480
1001
M0020 Train Rinses
1002
MOO 10 Filter
1004
MOOIOCondensate
2001
MOOIO Train Rinses
2002
MOO 10 Filter
2004
MOOIOCondensate
1011
MOOIO Train Rinses
1012
MOO 10 Filter
1014
MOOIOCondensate
2011
MOOIO Train Rinses
2012
MOO 10 Filter
2014
MOOIOCondensate
1006
MOOIO Train Rinses
1007
MOO 10 Filler
1009
MOOIOCondensate
2006
Liquid
Air
Liquid
Liquid
Air
Liquid
Liquid
Air
Liquid
Liquid
Air
Liquid
Liquid
Air
Liquid
Liquid
1 2/9/99 1200AM
1 2/9/99 1200 AM
1 2/9/99 12 00 AM
1 2/9/99 12 00 AM
1 2/9/99 12 00 AM
1 2/9/99 12 00 AM
1 2/11/99 1200 AM
1 2/1 1/99 12 00 AM
1 2/1 1/99 1200AM
1 2/12/99 12 00AM
1 2/12/99 1200 AM
1 2/12/99 1200AM
1 2/9/99 12 00 AM
, 1 2/9/99 1200 AM
1 2/9/99 1200AM
1 2/9/99 12 00 AM
2/15/99 9 44 AM lesl_smv
2/1 5/99 9 44 AM Icsl .sniv
2/15/99 9 44 AM lcst_smv
2/1 5/99 9 44 AM lesl_smv
2/1 5/99 9 44 AM tesl_smv
2/1 5/99 9 44 AM lest_smv
2/1 5/99 9 44 AM lest_smv
2/1 5/99 <) .14 AM lest siiw
2/1 5/99 9 44 AM lest_smv
2/1 5/99 9 44 AM lcsl_smv
2/15/999.44 AM lest_smv
2/15/999.44 AM tesl_smv
2/1 5/99 9 44 AM tesl_smv
2/1 5/99 9 44 AM tcst_smv
2/1 5/99 9 44 AM lcsl_smv
2/1 5/99 9 44 AM tesl_smv
3/15/9994400
3/15/9994400
3/15/99944-00
3/15/9994400
3/15/999:4400
3/15/9994400
3/15/99944 00
3/15/99944:00
3/15/999.44.00
3/15/9994400
3/15/9994400
MOOIO Tram Rinses
-------
Sample Master LIMS
Sample Login Report
Customer Name: EPA / EMC Option 1
Project ID: 4951
Order Comment: Hand delivered to sample control by J. Surman 2/15/99.
Order ID: 990200012
Order Date: 2/16/99
Page: 3 of 3
MRI Sample ID
99000481
99000482
99000483
99000484
99000485
99000486
99000487
99000488
Customer Sample ID Matrix
2007 Air
MOOIO Filter
2009 Liquid
MOOlOCondensate
1016 Liquid
MOOIO Train Rinses
1017 Air
MOO 10 Filter
1019 Liquid
MOOlOCondensate
2016 Liquid
MOOIO Train Rinses
2017 Air
MOO 10 Filter
2019 Liquid
MOOlOCondensate
Quantity Hate Collected Date Received Test Test Group Method
.1 2/9/99 12 00 AM 2/15/99 9 44 AM tesLsmv
1 2/9/99 1200 AM 2/1 5/99 9 44 AM lcst_smv
1 2/1 1/99 1200 AM 2/15/99 9 44 AM lesl_smv
1 2/1 1/99 12 00 AM 2/15/99 9 44 AM leM.smv
1 2/11/99 1200 AM 2/1 5/99 9 44 AM (est_smv
1 2/12/99 1200 AM 2/1 5/99 9 44 AM lest_smv
1 2/12/99 1200 AM 2/15/99944 AM test_smv
1 2/12/99 1200 AM 2/15/99944 AM tcs(_smv
SAMPLE CONDITION RECORD
Arc samples submitted with a chain of custody? Yes / / _
A J^ / / "& 1 /G l\ *~^
Arc the number of samples the same as stated on the chain of custody? Yes
Arc bottle caps tight and securely in place? Yes
Were all containers intact when received? Yes
Were samples submitted in an ice chest? Yes
Were samples received cold? Yes
Were samples within the holding time for the requested test(s)? Yes
i Is the volume of sample submitted sufficient for the requested tcst(s)? Yes
Are all samples for volatile organic analyses free of headspace? N/A
Due Date
3/15/9994400
3/15/9994400
3/15/9994400
3/15/9994400
3/ 1 5/99 9 44 00
,
*\ ^ ffc. f^~"^*f
7
-------
SAMPLE CONDITION AT RECEIVING LABORATORY
MRI Project No. 4951.03.04.01 Page 1 of 2
Sample Type: Sample components recovered from M0010 sampling trains and field blank trains; and field
reagent blank samples.
Target Analytes: POM and PAHs per Site-specific Test Plan and QAPP by Method 8270C. See analysis request
memo from April Carender and Jim Surman.
Fiefd Sample Condition Information Documented By u,
Date:
Sample
No.
1001
1002
1003
1004
1006
1007
1008
1009
1021
1022
1023
1024
1025
1026
1027
1028
2001
2002
2003
2004
2006
2007
2008
2009
001
002
3003
3004
3006
30Q7
300
Field Weight,
grams,
or Condition
Lab Weight,
grams,
or Condition
Comments
Received and
_Checked By
Date
Jut*.
8JJ.3
13S.O
79*7
7
(JV
The purpose of this form is to document the condition and to verify the integrity of samples received by the analytical
laboratory. The Field Laboratory Leader completes the first two columns with sample numbers and final gross field sample
weights of liquid samples or the condition of other samples as applicable. The analytical laboratory sample custodian, the
analytical coordinator, the analyst, or a designee observes all samples received, reweighs liquid samples that do not have
contents level marks or that are suspect, notes the condition of other samples, and documents all observations on this form.
SC0010X.WPO July 9. 1997 (rav SC001Q.WPO January 28, 1939)
-------
SAMPLE CONDITION AT RECEIVING LABORATORY
MRI Project No. 4951 .03.04.01 Page 2 of 2
Sample Type: Sample components recovered from M0010 sampling trains and field blank trains; and field
reagent blank samples.
Target Analytes: POM and PAHs per Site-specific Test Plan and QAPP by Method 8270C. See analysis request
request from April Carender and Jim Surman.
Field Sample Condition Information Documented By J •
Date:
Field Weight, Lab Weight,
Sample grams, grams,
No. or Condition or Condition
Comments
Received and
Checked By
Date
01.,
The purpose of this form is to document the condition and to verify the integrity of samples received by the analytical
laboratory. The Field Laboratory Leader completes the first two columns with sample numbers and final gross field sample
weights of liquid samples or the condition of other samples as applicable. The analytical laboratory sample custodian, the
analytical coordinator, the analyst, or a designee observes all samples received, reweighs liquid samples that do not have
contents level marks or that are suspect, notes the condition of other samples, and documents all observations on this form.
SC0010X.WPD July 9, 1997 (rev SC0010AWPD January 28. 19991
-------
Appendix B
Sample Collection Data
MR1-AED\R4<)51-03-04-01 »p
-------
FILE NAME - cdinl
RUN # - 1 - Method 0010 Train for POM & PAHs
LOCATION - Chip Dryer Baghouse Inlet Duct
DATE - 02/09/99 Time:1015-1145/1215-1345
PROJECT # - 4951.03.04.01
Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Feet)= 759.667
Final Meter Volume (Cubic Feet}= 886.207
Meter Factor= 1.038
Multiple leak checks, see end of printout
Net Meter Volume (Cubic Feet)= 131.349
bas Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Feet)= 128.727
Barometric Pressure (in Hg)= 29.52
Static Pressure (Inches H20)= -6.00
Percent Oxygen= 19.4
Percent Carbon Dioxide= 1. 0
Moisture Collected (ml)= 158.6
Percent Water= 5.5
Average Meter Temperature (F)= 74
Average Delta H (in H20)= 1.74
Average Delta P (in H20)= 1.735
Average Stack Temperature (F)= 175
Dry Molecular Weight= 28.94
Wet Molecular Weight= 28.34
Average Square Root of Delta P (in H20)= 1.3106
% Isbkinetic= 99.2
Pitot Coefficient= 0.80
Sampling Time (Minutes)= 180.0
Nozzle Diameter (Inches)= 0.191
Stack Axis #1 (Inches)= 17.8
Stack Axis #2 (Inches)= 17.6
Circular Stack
Stack Area (Square Feet)= 1.71
Stack Velocity (Actual, Feet/min)= 4,744
Flow Rate (Actual, Cubic It/min)= 8,094
Flow rate (Standard, Wet, Cubic ft/min)= 6,542
Flow Rate (Standard, Dry, Cubic ft/min)= 6,183
Particulate Loading - Front Half
l
Particulate Weight (g)= 0.0000
Particulate Loading, Dry Std. (gr/scf)= 0.0000
Particulate Loading, Actual (gr/cu ft)= 0.0000
Emission Rate (Ib/hr)= 0.00
PROG.=VER 06/09/89
02-17-1999 14:21:02
Leak Correction= 0.0000
Corr. to 7% O2
0.0000
Sc 12% C02
O.OOOQ
No Back Half Analysis
-------
* * METRIC UNITS * *
FILE NAME - cdinl
RUN # - 1 - Method 0010 Train for POM & ?AHs
LOCATION - Chip Dryer Baghouse Inlet Duct
DATE - 02/09/99 Time:1015-1145/1215-1345
PROJECT # - 4951.03.04.01
Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Meters)=
Final Meter Volume (Cubic Meters)=
Meter Factor=
Multiple leak checks, see end of printout
Net Meter Volume (Cubic Meters)=
Gas Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Meters)=
Barometric Pressure (mm Hg)=
Static Pressure (mm H20)=
Percent Oxygen=
Percent Carbon Dioxide=
Moisture Collected (ml)=
Percent Water=
PROG.=VER 06/09/89
02-17-1999 14:21:02
Average Meter Temperature (C)=
Average Delta H (mm H20)=
Average Delta P (mm H20)=
Average Stack Temperature (C)=
Dry Molecular Weight=
Wet Molecular Weight=
Average Square Root of Delta P (mm H20);
% Isokinetic=
Pitot Coefficient=
Sampling Time (Minutes)=
Nozzle Diameter (mm)=
Stack Axis #1 (Meters)=
Stack Axis #2 (Meters)=
Circular Stack
Stack Are3 (Square Meters)=
Stack Velocity (Actual, m/min)=
Flow rate (Actual, Cubic m/min)=
Flow rate (Standard, Wet, Cubic m/min)=
Flow rate (Standard, Dry, Cubic m/min)=
Particulate Loading - Front Half
Particulate Weight (g) =
Particulate Loading, Dry Std. (mg/cu m)
Particulate Loading, Actual (mg/cu m) =
Emission Rate (kg/hr)=
21.511
25.094
1.038
3 .719
3 .645
750
-152
19.4
1.0
158.6
5.5
23
44.3
44 .1
79
28 .94
28 .34
6 .6051
99.2
0 .80
180 .0
4 .85
0 .451
0 .448
0 .159
1,446
229
185
175
0.0000
0.0
0.0
0.00
Leak Correction= 0.0000
Corr. to 7% O2 & 12% CO:
0.0 0.0
No Back Half Analysis
-------
FILE NAME - cdinl
RUN # - 1 - Method 0010 Train for POM & ?AHs
LOCATION - Chip Dryer Baghouse Inlet Duct
DATE - 02/09/99 Time:1015-1145/1215-1345
PROJECT # - 4951.03.04.01
Point #
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
PROG.=VER 06/09/89
02-17-1999 14:21:03
Delta P
in
2 .
2.
2.
2.
2.
2 .
1.
1.
0.
0.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1 .
1 .
1 .
]_
1 .
1.
1.
1 .
1 .
. H20)
100
100
150
150
100
050
850
850
930
910
400
400
550
600
650
650
750
750
750
750
800
800
800
800
Delta H
(in
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
. H20)
.25
.10
.30
.25
.10
.00
.80
.80
.98
.97
.40
.30
.50
.65
. 65
.75
. 75
.70
.70
. 75
. 75
.80
.80
.80
Stack
(F)
175
173
168
173
173
171
181
185
176
160
171
174
175
171
174
172
180
173
177
186
181
179
176
174
T Meter T
In(F)
60
64
67
70
73
74
75
75
76
76
76
77
72
74
76
79
81
82
82
83
84
85
85
85
Out (F)
60
61
62
63
64
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
72
72
72
74
75
76
76
77
78
79
80
80
Fraction
DRY CATCH
FILTER
Fraction
PROBE RINSE
IMPINGERS
Final Wt . Tare Wt . 3lank Wt . Net Wt
(g) (g) (g) (g).
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Final Wt. Tare Wt.
(g) (g)
0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000
Vol
(ml)
0.0
0 .0
Net Wt
(g)
0.0000
0.0000
Probe Rinse Blank (mg/ml)= 0.0000
Impinger Blank (mg/ml)= 0.0000
Multiple leak checks used. Final readings for each segment are listed below
Lk Rate (cfm) Time (min)
0.0030 90.0000
0.0030 90.0000
-------
FILE NAME - cdoutl
RUN # - 1 - Method 0010 Train for POM & ?AHs
LOCATION - Chip Dryer Baghouse Outlet Stack
DATE - 02/09/99 Time:1015-1145/1215-1345
PROJECT # - 4951.03.04.01
Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Feet)= 239.038
Final Meter Volume (Cubic Feet)= 340.479
Meter Factor= 1.019
Multiple leak checks, see end of printout
Net Meter Volume (Cubic Feet)= 103.368
Gas Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Feet)= 101.049
Barometric Pressure (in Hg)= 29.52
Static Pressure (Inches H20)= -0.70
Percent Oxygen= 19.6
Percent Carbon Dioxide= 0 . 9
Moisture Collected (ml)= 116.8
Percent Water= 5.2
Average Meter Temperature (F)= 75
Average Delta H (in H20) = 1.54
Average Delta P (in H20)= 0.538
Average Stack Temperature (F)= 163
Dry Molecular Weight= 28.93
Wet Molecular Weight= 28.36
Average Square Root of Delta P (in H20)= 0.6426
% Isokinetic= 102.6
Pitot Coefficient= 0.81
Sampling Time (Minutes)= 180.0
Nozzle Diameter (Inches)= 0.234
Stack Axis #1 (Inches)= 22.8
Stack Axis #2 (Inches)= 24.3
Circular Stack
Stack Area (Square Feet)= 3.01
Stack Velocity (Actual, Feet/min)= 2,317
Flow Rate (Actual, Cubic ft/min)= 6,972
Flow rate (Standard, Wet, Cubic ft/min)= 5,816
Flow Rate (Standard, Dry, Cubic ft/min)= 5,516
Particulate Loading - Front Half
Particulate Weight (g)= 0.0000
Particulate Loading, Dry Std. (gr/scf)= 0.0000
Particulate Loading, Actual (gr/cu ft)= 0.0000
Emission Rate (lb/hr)= 0.00
PROG.=VER 06/09/89
02-17-1999 14:22:10
Leak Correction= 0.0000
Corr. to 7% O2 & 12% CO.
0.0000 0.OOOC
No Back Half Analysis
-------
* * METRIC UNITS * *
FILE NAME - cdoutl
RUN # - 1 - Method 0010 Train for POM & PAHs
LOCATION - Chip Dryer Baghouse Outlet Stack
DATE - 02/09/99 Time:1015-1145/1215-1345
PROJECT # - 4951.03.04.01
Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Meters)= 6.769
Final Meter Volume (Cubic Meters) = 9.641
Meter Factor= 1.019
Multiple leak checks, see end of printout
Net Meter Volume (Cubic Meters)= 2.927
Gas Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Meters)= 2.861
Barometric Pressure (mm Hg)= 750
Static Pressure (mm H20)= -18
Percent Oxygen= 19.6
Percent Carbon Dioxide= 0.9
Moisture Collected (ml)= 116.8
Percent Water= 5.2
Average Meter Temperature (C)= 24
Average Delta H (mm H20)= 39.1
Average Delta P (mm H20) = 13.7
Average Stack Temperature (C)= 73
Dry Molecular Weight= 28.93
Wet Molecular Weight= 28.36
Average Square Root of Delta P (mm H20)= 3.2387
% Isokinetic= 102.6
Pitot Coefficient= 0.81
Sampling Time (Minutes)= 180.0
Nozzle Diameter (mm)= 5.94
Stack Axis #1 (Meters)= 0.578
Stack Axis #2 (Meters)= 0.616
Circular Stack
Stack Area (Square Meters)= 0.280
Stack Velocity (Actual, m/min)= 706
Flow rate (Actual, Cubic m/min)= 197
Flow rate (Standard, Wet, Cubic m/min)= 165
Flow rate (Standard, Dry, Cubic m/min)= 156
Particulate Loading - Front Half
Particulate Weight (g)= 0.0000
Particulate Loading, Dry Std. (mg/cu m)= 0.0
Particulate Loading, Actual (mg/cu m)= 0.0
Emission Rate (kg/hr)= 0.00
PROG.=VER 06/09/89
02-17-1999 14:22:10
Leak Correction= 0.0000
Corr. to 7% O2 & 12% C02
0.0 0.0
No Back Half Analysis
-------
FILE NAME - cdoutl
RUN # - 1 - Method 0010 Train for POM & PAHs
LOCATION - Chip Dryer Baghouse Outlet Stack
DATE - 02/09/99 Time:1015-1145/1215-1345
PROJECT # - 4951.03.04.01
Point #
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
PROG.=VER 06/09/89
02-17-1999 14:22:11
Delta P
(in
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
1.
1.
0.
0.
0 .
0.
0 .
0.
0 .
0 .
0.
1.
1.
1.
. H20)
110
110
080
170
050
050
080
330
740
200
500
600
550
420
370
130
060
060
190
700
910
100
200
200
Delta H
(in
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
3
4
4
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
2
2
3
3
3
. H20)
.32
.31
.22
.47
.14
.14
.22
.92
.10
.40
.30
.60
.60
.20
.05
.37
.17
.17
.54
.00
.60
.20
.50
.40
Stack
(F)
133
156
157
159
160
160
164
167
167
165
168
167
152
163
164
166
169
169
169
171
171
169
168
167
T Meter T
In(F)
60
62
64
65
68
68
69
71
74
80
83
87
74
77
80
83
82
82
81
84
86
89
89
90
Out (F)
60
61
62
63
64
65
67
68
69
70
72
74
74
74
75
77
78
79
79
81
81
82
82
82
Fraction
DRY CATCH
FILTER
Fraction
Final Wt. Tare Wt. Blank Wt. Net Wt
(g) (g) (g) (g)
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Final Wt. Tare Wt.
(g) (g)
PROBE RINSE 0.0000 0.0000
IMPINGERS 0.0000 0.0000
Probe Rinse Blank (mg/ml)= 0.0000
Impinger Blank (mg/ml)= 0.0000
Vol
(ml)
0.0
0.0
Net Wt
(g)
0.0000
0.0000
Multiple leak checks used. Final readings for each segment are listed below
Lk Rate (cfm) Time (min)
0.0020 90.0000
0.0010 90.0000
-------
FILE NAME - cdin2
RUN # - 2 - Method 0010 Train for POM & PAHs
LOCATION - Chip Dryer Baghouse Inlet Duct
DATE - 02/09/99 Time:1545 -1715/1745-1915
PROJECT # - 4951.03.04.01
Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Feet)= 887.007
Final Meter Volume (Cubic Feet)= 1004.573
Meter Factor= 1.038
Multiple leak checks, see end of printout
Net Meter Volume (Cubic Feet)= 122.033
Gas Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Feet)= 117.791
Barometric Pressure (in Hg)= 29.46
Static Pressure (Inches H20)= -6.00
Percent Oxygen= 19.4
Percent Carbon Dioxide= 1. 0
Moisture Collected (ml)= 127.0
Percent Water= 4 . 8
Average Meter Temperature (F)= 80
Average Delta H (in H20)= 1.49
Average Delta P (in H20)= 1.440
Average Stack Temperature (F)= 169
Dry Molecular Weight= 28.94
Wet Molecular Weight= 28.41
Average Square Root of Delta P (in H20)= 1.1980
% Isokinetic= 98.4
PROG.=VER 06/09/89
02-17-1999 14:23:22
Leak Correction= 0.0000
Pitot Coefficient= 0.80
Sampling Time (Minutes)= 180.0
Nozzle Diameter (Inches)= 0.191
Stack Axis #1 (Inches)= 17.8
Stack Axis #2 (Inches)= 17.6
Circular Stack
Stack Area (Square Feet)= 1.71
Stack Velocity (Actual, Feet/min)= 4,316
Flow Rate (Actual, Cubic ft/min)= , 7,365
Flow rate (Standard, Wet, Cubic ft/min)= 5,994
Flow Rate (Standard, Dry, Cubic ft/min)= 5,704
Particulate Loading - Front Half
Particulate Weight (g)= 0.0000
Particulate Loading, Dry Std. (gr/scf)= 0.0000
Particulate Loading, Actual (gr/cu ft) = 0.0000
Emission Rate (lb/hr)= 0.00
Corr. to 7% 02 & 12% C02
0.0000 0.0000
No Back Half Analysis
-------
* * METRIC UNITS * *
FILE NAME - cdin2
RUN # - 2 - Method 0010 Train for POM & PAHs
LOCATION - Chip Dryer Baghouse Inlet Duct
DATE - 02/09/99 Time:1545-1715/1745-1915
PROJECT # - 4951.03.04.01
Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Meters)= 25.116
Final Meter Volume (Cubic Meters)= 28.445
Meter Factor= 1.038
Multiple leak checks, see end of printout
Net Meter Volume (Cubic Meters)= 3.456
Gas Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Meters)= 3.335
Barometric Pressure (mm Hg)= 748
Static Pressure (mm H20)= -152
Percent Oxygen= 19.4
Percent Carbon Dioxide= 1. 0
Moisture Collected ' (ml)= 127.0
Percent Water= 4 . 8
Average Meter Temperature (C)= 27
Average Delta H (mm H20)= 37.9
Average Delta P (mm H20)= 36.6
Average Stack Temperature (C)= 76
Dry Molecular Weight= 28.94
Wet Molecular Weight= 28.41
Average Square Root of Delta P (mm H20)= 6.0379
% Isokinetic= 98.4
Pitot Coefficient= 0.80
Sampling Time (Minutes)= 180.0
Nozzle Diameter (mm)= 4.85
Stack Axis #1 (Meters)= 0.451
Stack Axis #2 (Meters)= 0.448
Circular Stack
Stack Area (Square Meters)= 0.159
Stack Velocity (Actual, m/min)= 1,316
Flow rate (Actual, Cubic m/min)= 209
Flow rate (Standard, Wet, Cubic m/min)= 170
Flow rate (Standard, Dry, Cubic m/min)= 162
Particulate Loading - Front Half
Particulate Weight (g)= 0.0000
Particulate Loading, Dry Std. (mg/cu m)= 0.0
Particulate Loading, Actual (mg/cu m)= 0.0
Emission Rate (kg/hr)= 0.00
PROG.=VER 06/09/89
02-17-1999 14:23:23
Leak Correction= 0.0000
Corr. to 7% O2
0.0
12% CC
0 .0
No Back Half Analysis
-------
FILE NAME- - cdin2
RUN # - 2 - Method 0010 Train for POM & PAHs
LOCATION - Chip Dryer Baghouse Inlet Duct
DATE - 02/09/99 Time:1545 -1715/1745-1915
PROJECT # - 4951.03.04.01
Point #
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
PROG.=VER 06/09/89
02-17-1999 14:23:23
Delta P
(in
1.
1.
1.
1 .
1.
1.
1.
1 .
1.
1 .
1 .
1 .
1 .
1 .
1 .
1 .
1 .
1 ,
1 .
1 .
1 .
1 .
1 .
1 .
. H20)
600
600
650
650
550
550
450
450
300
300
200
200
150
150
300
350
450
450
500
500
550
550
550
550
Delta H
(in
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
. H20)
.65
.60
.65
.60
.60
.65
.55
.50
.40
.35
.30
.30
.20
.20
.35
.35
.50
.50
.55
.60
.60
.60
.60
.60
Stack
(F)
180
176
175
177
175
177
173
172
172
172
170
171
163
163
163
164
163
163
162
165
166
167
167
166
T Meter T
In(F)
77
78
80
82
83
84
85
85
85
86
86
86
79
78
80
81
81
82
83
83
83
83
82
82
Out (F)
77
77
77
78
78
79
80
80
80
81
81
81
79
78
78
78
78
78
78
78
78
78
77
78
Fraction
DRY CATCH
FILTER
Fraction
Final Wt. Tare Wt. Blank Wt. Net Wt
(g) (g) (g) (g)
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Final Wt. Tare Wt. Vol. Net Wt.
(g) (g) (ml) (g)
PROBE RINSE 0.0000 0.0000 0.0 0.0000
IMPINGERS 0.0000 0.0000 0.0 0.0000
Probe Rinse Blank (mg/ml)= 0.0000
Impinger Blank (mg/ml)= 0.0000
Multiple leak checks used. Final readings for each segment are listed below
Lk Rate (cfm) Time (min)
0.0010 90.0000
0.0020 90.0000
-------
FILE NAME - cdout2
RUN # - 2 - Method 0010 Train for POM & ?AHs
LOCATION - Chip Dryer Baghouse Outlet Stack
DATE - 02/09/99 Time:1545-1715/1745-1915
PROJECT # - 4951.03.04.01
PROG.=VER 06/09/89
02-17-1999 14:24:08
Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Feet)=
Final Meter Volume (Cubic Feet)=
Meter Factor=
Multiple leak checks, see end of printout
Net Meter Volume (Cubic Feet)=
Gas Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Feet)=
Barometric Pressure (in Hg)=
Static Pressure (Inches H20)=
Percent Oxygen=
Percent Carbon Dioxide=
Moisture Collected (ml)=
Percent Water=
Average Meter Temperature (F)=
Average Delta H (in H20)=
Average Delta P (in H20)=
Average Stack Temperature (F)=
Dry Molecular Weight=
Wet Molecular Weight=
Average Square Root of Delta P (in H20)=
% Isokinetic=
Pitot Coefficient=
Sampling Time (Minutes)=
Nozzle Diameter (Inches)=
Stack Axis #1 (Inches)=
Stack Axis #2 (Inches)=
Circular Stack
Stack Area (Square Feet)=
Stack Velocity (Actual, Feet/min) =
Flow Rate (Actual, Cubic ft/min) =
Flow rate (Standard, Wet
Flow Rate (Standard, Dry
Cubic f t/min)
Cubic f t/min)
Particulate Loading - Front Half
Particulate Weight (g) =
Particulate Loading, Dry Std. (gr/scf)=
Particulate Loading, Actual (gr/cu ft)=
Emission Rate (Ib/hr) =
341.212
437.965
1.019
98.591
95.091
29.46
-0.70
19.6
0.9
112.1
5.3
81
1.37
0 .473
161
28. 93
28 .35
0.6052
102.4
0.81
180.0
0 .234
22.8
24 .3
3 . 01
2 , 180
6, 559
5,485
5,196
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.00
Leak Correction^ 0.0000
Corr. to 7% O2 & 12% CO
0.0000 0.0000
No Back Half Analysis
-------
* * METRIC UNITS * *
FILE NAME - cdout2
RUN # - 2 - Method 0010 Train for POM & PAHs
LOCATION - Chip Dryer Baghouse Outlet Stack
DATE - 02/09/99 Time:1545-1715/1745-1915
PROJECT # - 4951.03.04.01
Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Meters)= 9.662
Final Meter Volume (Cubic Meters)= 12.401
Meter Factor= 1.019
Multiple leak checks, see end of printout
Net Meter Volume (Cubic Meters)= 2.792
Gas Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Meters) = 2.693
Barometric Pressure (mm Hg)= 748
Static Pressure (mm H20)= -18
Percent Oxygen= 19.6
Percent Carbon Dioxide= 0 . 9
Moisture Collected (ml)= 112.1
Percent Water= 5 . 3
Average Meter Temperature (C)= 27
Average Delta H (mm H20)= 34.8
Average Delta P (mm H20)= 12.0
Average Stack Temperature (C)= 71
Dry Molecular Weight= 28.93
Wet Molecular Weight= 28.35
Average Square Root of Delta P (mm H20)= 3.0501
% Isokinetic= 102.4
Pitot Coefficient= 0.81
Sampling Time (Minutes)= 180.0
Nozzle Diameter (mm)= 5.94
Stack Axis #1 (Meters)= 0.578
Stack Axis #2 (Meters)= 0.616
Circular Stack
Stack Area (Square Meters)= 0.280
Stack Velocity (Actual, m/min)= 664
Flow rate (Actual, Cubic m/min)= 186
Flow rate (Standard, Wet, Cubic m/min)= 155
Flow rate (Standard, Dry, Cubic m/min)= 147
Particulate Loading - Front Half
Particulate Weight (g)= 0.0000
Particulate Loading, Dry Std. (mg/cu m)= 0.0
Particulate Loading, Actual (mg/cu m)= 0.0
Emission Rate (kg/hr)= 0.00
PROG.=VER 06/09/89
02-17-1999 14:24:08
Leak Correction^ 0.0000
Corr. to 7% O2 & 12% CO2
0.0 0.0
No Back Half Analysis
-------
FILE NAME - cdout2
RUN # - 2 - Method 0010 Train for POM & PAHs
LOCATION - Chip Dryer Baghouse Outlet Stack
DATE - 02/09/99 Time:1545 -1715/1745-1915
PROJECT # - 4951.03.04.01
Point #
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
PROG.=VER 06/09/89
02-17-1999 14:24:09
Delta P
in
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
1.
1.
0.
0 .
0.
0.
0 .
0.
0.
0 .
0.
0.
1.
1 .
. H20)
090
070
060
040
030
050
230
600
830
100
300
300
410
350
230
050
050
270
300
480
550
750
100
100
Delta H
(in
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
3
3
3
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
2
3
3
. H20)
.25
.20
.17
.11
.08
.14
.66
.70
.40
.20
.80
.80
.20
.00
.66
.14
.14
.78
.86
.40
.60
.20
.20
.20
Stack
(F)
166
163
165
166
165
164
164
164
165
165
165
164
156
157
157
157
157
156
158
157
157
157
156
155
T Meter T
In(F)
79
79
79
80
80
80
81
82
86
90
92
93
80
79
81
81
79
78
79
80
82
83
85
86
Out (F)
79
79
79
79
79
79
80
80
81
81
82
83
80
78
78
78
78
78
77
77
78
78
78
78
Fraction
DRY CATCH
FILTER
Fraction
Final Wt. Tare Wt. Blank Wt. Net Wt
(g) (g) (g) (g)
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Final Wt. Tare Wt
(g) ' (g)
PROBE RINSE 0.0000 0.0000
IMPINGERS 0.0000 0.0000
Probe Rinse Blank (mg/ml)= 0.0000
Vol
(ml)
0.0
0.0
Net Wt
(g)
0.0000
0.0000
Impinger Blank (mg/ml)= 0.0000
Multiple leak checks used. Final readings for each segment are listed below
Lk Rate (cfm) Time (min)
D.0060 90.0000
0.0040 90.0000
-------
FILE NAME - rfinl PROG.=VER 06/09/89
RUN ft - 1 - Method 0010 Train for POM & ?AHs 02-17-1999 14:25:16
LOCATION - Reverberatory Furnace #1 Baghouse Inlet Duct
DATE - 02/11/99 Time:1130-1400/1415-1645/1715-1945/1955-2345
PROJECT # - 4951.03.04.01
Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Feet)= 335.267
Final Meter Volume (Cubic Feet)= 557.120
Meter Factor= " 0.985
Multiple leak checks, see end of printout;
Net Meter Volume (Cubic Feet)= 218.525
Gas Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Feet}= 211.180
Barometric Pressure (in Hg)= 29.61
Static Pressure (Inches H20)= -1.70
Percent Oxygen= 20.9
Percent Carbon Dioxide= 0.2
Moisture Collected (ml)= 100.2
Percent Water= 2.2
Average Meter Temperature (F)= 81
Average Delta H (in H20)= 0.32
Average Delta P (in H20)= 0.760
Average Stack Temperature (F)= 138
Dry Molecular Weight= 28.87
Wet Molecular Weight= 28.63
Average Square Root of Delta P (in H20)= 0.8712
% Isokinetic= 99.6
Pitot Coefficient= 0.83
Sampling Time (Minutes)= 680.0
Nozzle Diameter (Inches)= 0.147
Stack Axis #1 (Inches)= 36.5
Stack Axis #2 (Inches)= 38.2
Circular Stack
Stack Area (Square Feet)= 7.60
Stack Velocity (Actual, Feec/min)= 3,111
Flow Rate (Actual, Cubic ft/min)= 23,647
Flow rate (Standard, Wet, Cubic ft/min)= 20,569
Flow Rate (Standard, Dry, Cubic ft/min)= 20,119
Particulate Loading - Front Half
Particulate Weight (g)= 0.0000
Particulate Loading, Dry Std. (gr/scf)= 0.0000
Particulate Loading, Actual (gr/cu ft}= 0.0000
Emission Rate (lb/hr)= 0.00
Leak Correction= 0.0000
Corr. to 7% 02
0.0000
& 12% C02
0.0000
No Back Half Analysis
-------
* * METRIC UNITE * *
FILE NAME - rfinl PROG.=VER 06/09/89
RUN # - 1 - Method 0010 Train for POM & ?AHs 02-17-1999 14:25:17
LOCATION - Reverberatory Furnace #1 Baghcuse Inlet Duct
DATE - 02/11/99 Time:1130-1400/1415-1645/1715-1945/1955-2345
PROJECT # - 4951.03.04.01
Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Meters)= 9.493
Final Meter Volume (Cubic Meters)= 15.775
Meter Factor= 0.985
Multiple leak checks, see end of printout
Net Meter Volume (Cubic Meters)= 6.188
Gas Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Meters)= 5.980
Barometric Pressure (mm Hg)= 752
Static Pressure (mm H20)= -43
Percent Oxygen= 20.9
Percent Carbon Dioxide= 0 . 2
Moisture Collected (ml)= 100.2
Percent Water= 2 . 2
Average Meter Temperature (C)= 27
Average Delta H (mm H20)= 8.0
Average Delta P (mm H20)= 19.3
Average Stack Temperature (C)= 59
Dry Molecular Weight= 28.87
Wet Molecular Weight= 28.63
Average Square Root of Delta P (mm H20)= 4.3907
% Isokinetic= 99.6
Pitot Coefficient= 0.83
Sampling Time (Minutes)= 680.0
Nozzle Diameter (mm)= 3.73
Stack Axis #1 (Meters)= 0.927
Stack Axis #2 (Meters)= 0.970
Circular Stack
Stack Area (Square Meters)= 0.706
Stack Velocity (Actual, m/min)= 948
Flow rate (Actual, Cubic m/min)= 670
Flow rate (Standard, Wet, Cubic m/min) = 582
Flow rate (Standard, Dry, Cubic m/min)= 570
Particulate Loading - Front Half
Particulate Weight (g)= 0.0000
Particulate Loading, Dry Std. (mg/cu m)= 0.0
Particulate Loading, Actual (mg/cu m)= 0.0
Emission Rate (kg/hr)= 0.00
Leak Correction= 0.0000
Corr. to 7% 02 & 12% CO:
0.0 0.0
No Back Half Analysis
-------
FILE NAME - rfinl PROG.=VER 06/09/89
RUN # - 1 - Method 0010 Train for POM & PAHs 02-17-1999 14:25:17
LOCATION - Reverberatory Furnace #1 Baghouse Inlet Duct
DATE - 02/11/99 Time:1130-1400/1415-1645/1715-1945/1955-2345
PROJECT # - 4951.03.04.01
Point #
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
Delta P
in. H20)
0.750
0 .860
0.750
0. 800
0.750
0.800
0.800
0. 750
0. 800
0. 800
0.800
0.900
0. 900
0.850
0. 850
0.850
0 .800
0 .800
0.800
0 .850
0.720
0 .720
0 .740
0 .740
0 .740
0 .750
0 .620
0 .650
0 .620
0 .620
0 .650
0 .650
0 .670
0.670
0.670
0.800
0.750
0.680
0.700
0.750
Delta H
(in. H20)
0.36
0.40
0.30
0.31
0.30
0.33
0 .30
0.28
0 .30
0.28
0.30
0.42
0.37
0.34
0.30
0.30
0.25
0.25
0.28
0 .40
0.27
0.28
0.30
0.33
0.28
0 .31
0.28
0 .26
0.21
0 .25
0 .26
0.28
0.31
0 .29
0 .28
0.30
0 .34
0 .29
0 .30
0.31
Stack
(F)
140
145
200
200
175
150
150
160
175
150
150
115
130
140
200
250
275
250
200
120
125
125
145
125
175
175
130
150
200
130
120
120
110
110
110
200
120
165
120
115
T Meter T
In(F)
70
75
77
79
80
83
84
82
84
84
85
85
84
84
83
81
82
81
81
82
83
84
86
86
86
86
85
84
83
84
80
79
80
81
82
82
83
84
84
83
Out (F)
69
71
73
75
77
79
80
80
81
82
83
83
82
81
81
80
81
80
79
80
80
82
84
84
84
84
84
83
82
82
79
79
79
80
80
81
82
83
83
82
-------
FILE NAME - rfinl PROG.=VER 06/09/89
RUN # - 1 - Method 0010 Train for POM & PAHs 02-17-1999 14:25:18
LOCATION - Reverberatory Furnace #1 Baghouse Inlet Duct
DATE - 02/11/99 Time:1130 -1400/1415 - 1645/1715 -1945/1955-2345
PROJECT # - 4951.03.04.01
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.730
.750
.750
.780
.750
.820
.820
.840
.840
.820
.820
.750
.750
.750
.740
.750
.750
.750
.750
.740
.740
.760
.760
.760
.760
.770
.770
.760
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.30
.30
.31
.31
.32
.38
.36
.36
.36
.36
.37
. 34
.33
.33
.33
.32
.32
.33
.34
.34
. 33
.33
.34
.33
.34
.34
.33
.33
125
150
150
175
135
108
108
102
102
105
105
107
107
107
105
108
105
105
105
104
104
104
104
105
105
104
104
104
£2
£2
£2
62
81
60
80
79
60
£1
SI
31
S i
S i
f* ~l
S2
S2
£2
51
£1
£1
*•* -1
~ n
•^ \j
so
79
—r r\
/ y
79
78
82
82
81
81
81
80
80
79
79
80
80
80
80
80
80
81
81
81
81
81
81
80
79
79
78
78
78
77
Fraction
DRY CATCH
FILTER
Fraction
Final Wt. Tare Wt. Blank Wt. Net Wt
(g) (g) (g) (g)
0.0000 0.0000 C.OOOO 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 C.OOOO 0.0000
Final Wt. Tare Wt. Vol. Net Wt.
(g) (g) (ml) (g)
PROBE RINSE 0.0000 0.0000 3.0 0.0000
IMPINGERS 0.0000 0.0000 3.0 0.0000
Probe Rinse Blank (mg/ml)= 0.0000
Impinger Blank (mg/ml)= 0.0000
Multiple leak checks used. Final readings for each segment are listed below
Lk Rate (cfm) Time (min)
0.0020 150.0000
0.0030 150.0000
0.0030 150.0000
0.0030 230.0000
-------
Leak Correction= O.QOOO
FILE NAME - rfoutl PROG.=VER 06/09/89
RUN # - 1 - Method 0010 Train for POM & PAHs 02-17-1999 14:26:20
LOCATION - Reverberatory Furnace #1 Baghouse Outlet Stack
DATE - 02/11/99 Time:1130 -1400/1415-1645/1700-1930/1935-2345
PROJECT # - 4951.03.04.01
Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Feet)= 6.555
Final Meter Volume (Cubic Feet)= 185.544
Meter Factor= 1.038
Multiple leak checks, see end of printout
Net Meter Volume (Cubic Feet)= 185.791
Gas Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Feet)= 179.014
Barometric Pressure (in Hg)= 29.61
Static Pressure (Inches H20)= -0.30
Percent Oxygen= 20.9
Percent Carbon Dioxide= 0 . 2
Moisture Collected (ml)= 85.2
Percent Water= 2.2
Average Meter Temperature (F)= 82
Average Delta H (in H20}= 0.19
Average Delta P (in H20)= 0.469
Average Stack Temperature (F)= 108
Dry Molecular Weight= 28.86
Wet Molecular Weight= 28.63
Average Square Root of Delta P (in H20)= 0.6845
% Isokinetic= 101.0
Pitot Coefficient= 0.83
Sampling Time (Minutes)= 700.0
Nozzle Diameter (Inches)= 0.147
Stack Axis #1 (Inches)= 46.0
Stack Axis #2 (Inches)= 45.7
Circular Stack
Stack Area (Square Feet)= 11.46
Stack- Velocity (Actual, Feet/min)= 2,388
Flow Rate (Actual, Cubic ft/min)= 27,376
Flow rate (Standard, Wet, Cubic ft/min)= 25,183
Flow Rate (Standard, Dry, Cubic ft/min)= 24,631
Particulate Loading - Front Half
Particulate Weight (g)= 0.0000
Particulate Loading, Dry Std. (gr/scf)= 0.0000
Particulate Loading, Actual (gr/cu ft)= 0.0000
Emission Rate (lb/hr)= 0.00
Corr. to 7% 02 & 12% CO2
0.0000 0.0000
No Back Half Analysis
-------
* * METRIC UNITS * *
FILE NAME - rfoutl PROG.=VER 06/09/89
RUN # - 1 - Method 0010 Train for POM & PAHs 02-17-1999 14:26:21
LOCATION - Reverberatory Furnace #1 Baghouse Outlet Stack
DATE - 02/11/99 Time:1130-1400/1415-1645/1700-1930/1935-2345
PROJECT # - 4951.03.04.01
Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Meters) = 0.186
Final Meter Volume (Cubic Meters)= 5.254
Meter Factor= 1.038
Multiple leak checks, see end of printout
Net Meter Volume (Cubic Meters)= 5.261
Gas Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Meters)= 5.069
Barometric Pressure (mm Hg)= 752
Static Pressure (mm H20)= -8
Percent Oxygen= 20.9
Percent Carbon Dioxide= 0.2
Moisture Collected (ml)= 85.2
Percent Water= 2.2
Average Meter Temperature (C)= 28
Average Delta H (mm H20)= 4.8
Average Delta P (mm H20)= 11.9
Average Stack Temperature (C)= 42
Dry Molecular Weight= 28.86
Wet Molecular Weight= 28.63
Average Square Root of Delta P (mm H20)= 3.4499
% Isokinetic= 101.0
Pitot Coefficient= 0.83
Sampling Time (Minutes)= 700.0
Nozzle Diameter (mm)= 3.73
Stack Axis #1 (Meters)= 1.168
Stack Axis #2 (Meters)= 1.160
Circular Stack
Stack Area (Square Meters)= 1.065
Stack Velocity (Actual, m/min)= 728
Flow rate (Actual, Cubic m/min)= 775
Flow rate (Standard, Wet, Cubic m/min)= 713
Flow rate (Standard, Dry, Cubic m/min) = 697
Particulate Loading - Front Half
Particulate Weight (g) = 0.0000
Particulate Loading, Dry Std. (mg/cu m)= 0.0
Particulate Loading, Actual (mg/cu m)= 0.0
Emission Rate (kg/hr)= 0.00
Leak Correction= 0.0000
Corr. to 7%
0 .0
12% CO
0 .0
No Back Half Analysis
-------
FILE NAME - rfoutT PROG.=VER 06/09/89
RUN ft - 1 - Method 0010 Train for POM & PAHs 02-17-1999 14:26:21
LOCATION - Reverberatory Furnace #1 Baghouse Outlet Stack
DATE - 02/11/99 Time:1130-1400/1415-1645/1700-1930/1935-2345
PROJECT ft - 4951.03.04.01
Point ft
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
Delta P
in
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0 .
0.
0 .
0 .
0.
0 .
0 .
0 .
0 .
0 .
0 .
0.
0 .
0 .
0 .
0 .
0 .
0.
0.
0 .
0 .
0 .
0 .
0 .
0 .
0 .
0 .
0 .
0 .
0 .
0 .
0 .
0 .
. H20)
410
350
450
440
490
490
460
500
500
500
500
520
450
440
480
500
520
520
500
520
530
510
470
490
350
360
420
420
460
450
410
430
490
490
450
470
470
470
470
470
Delta H
(in.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0 .
0.
0 .
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0 .
0.
0 .
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0 .
0 .
0 .
0 .
0.
0 .
0 .
0 .
0 .
0 .
0.
H20)
20
12
19
16
19
19
18
21
20
19
19
19
17
16
18
19
21
21
20
21
21
20
18
19
12
13
18
19
20
20
16
16
^0
20
18
19
20
20
19
19
Stack
(F)
118
124
137
138
134
138
135
126
112
109
118
123
139
150
142
139
115
113
115
114
123
122
128
126
114
110
107
102
95
93
100
116
96
99
114
114
104
97
88
86
T Meter T
In(F)
67
72
75
78
82
83
85
86
88
88
88
88
87
86
87
87
88
88
89
89
89
89
88
87
85
84
86
87
87
87
86
84
82
81
80
79
77
77
77
77
Out (F)
67
71
72
76
79
81
82
84
86
86
86
87
86
86
86
85
86
86
87
87
87
87
86
85
85
85
85
86
86
86
86
85
83
81
81
79
78
78
78
78
-------
FILE NAME - rfoutl • PROG.=VER 06/09/89
RUN # - 1 - Method 0010 Train for POM & ?AHs 02-17-1999 14:26:22
LOCATION - Reverberatory Furnace #1 Baghcuse Outlet Stack
DATE - 02/11/99 Time:1130 -1400/1415-1645 1700-1930/1935-2345
PROJECT # - 4951.03.04.01
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.470
.480
.500
.490
.500
.510
.500
.500
.460
.460
.470
.460
.470
.470
.460
.470
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.20
.21
.21
.21
.21
.22
.21
.21
.19
.19
.20
.19
.22
.20
.19
.20
85
86
84
89
86
86
84
84
83
85
82
82
82
84
86
86
77
78
79
80
82
83
84
84
83
83
82
81
30
79
79
77
77
78
78
79
79
81
82
82
82
82
81
80
79
78
77
76
Fraction
DRY CATCH
FILTER
Fraction
PROBE RINSE
IMPINGERS
Probe Rinse Blank (mg/ml)=
Impinger Blank (mg/ml)= 0.0000
Multiple leak checks used. Final readings for each segment are listed below
Lk Rate (cfm) Time (mm)
0.0030 150.0000
0.0030 150.0000
0.0030 150.0000
0.0020 250.0000
Final
(g)
0 .0000
0.0000
Final
(g)
0. 0000
0 . 0000
ig/ml) =
Wt. Tare Wt .
(g)
0 .0000
0.0000
Wt . Tare Wt .
(g)
0 .0000
0 .0000
0 .0000
i:lank Wt .
(g)
: .0000
: .0000
Vol.
(ml)
3.0 0
0.0 0
Net Wt
(g)
0.0000
0 .0000
Net Wt
(g)
.0000
.0000
-------
FILE NAME - rfin2 PROG.=VER 06/09/89
RUN # - 2 - Method 0010 Train for POM & PAHs 02-17-1999 14:27:20
LOCATION - Reverberatory Furnace #1 Baghouse Inlet Duct
DATE - 1015-1035/1045-1255/1300-1530/1610-1840/1855-2315
PROJECT # - 4951.03.04.01
Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Feet}= 558.275
Final Meter Volume (Cubic Feet)= 796.164
Meter Factor= 0.985
Multiple leak checks, see end of printout
Net Meter Volume (Cubic Feet)= 234.321
Gas Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Feet)= 236.299
Barometric Pressure (in Hg)= 29.72
Static Pressure (Inches H20)= -1.70
Percent Oxygen= 20.9
Percent Carbon Dioxide= 0.2
Moisture Collected (ml)= 29.1
Percent Water= 0.6
Average Meter Temperature (F)= 60
Average Delta H (in H20}= 0.35
Average Delta P (in H20}= 0.845
Average Stack Temperature (F)= 123
Dry Molecular Weight= 28.87
Wet Molecular Weight= 28.81
Average Square Root of Delta P (in H20)= 0.9178
% Isokinetic= 98.5
Pitot Coefficient= 0.83
Sampling Time (Minutes)= 710.0
Nozzle Diameter (Inches)= 0.147
Stack Axis #1 (Inches)= 36.5
Stack Axis #2 (Inches)= 38.2
Circular Stack
Stack Area (Square Feet)= 7.60
Stack Velocity (Actual, Feet/min)= 3,221
Flow Rate (Actual, Cubic ft/min)= 24,483
Flow rate (Standard, Wet, Cubic ft/min)= 21,914
Flow Rate (Standard, Dry, Cubic ft/min)= 21,788
i
Particulate Loading - Front Half
Particulate Weight (g)= 0.0000
Particulate Loading, Dry Std. (gr/scf)= 0.0000
Particulate Loading, Actual (gr/cu ft)= 0.0000
Emission Rate (lb/hr)= 0.00
Leak Correction= 0.0000
Corr. to 7% 02 & 12% CO2
0.0000 0.0000
No Back Half Analysis
-------
Leak Correction= 0.0000
* * METRIC UNITS * *
FILE NAME - rfin2 PROG.=VER 06/09/89
RUN # - 2 - Method 0010 Train for POM & ?AHs 02-17-1999 14:27:20
LOCATION - Reverberatory Furnace #1 Baghcuse Inlet Duct
DATE - 1015-1035/1045-1255/1300-1530/16i:-1840/1855-2315
PROJECT # - 4951.03.04.01
Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Meters)= 15.808
Final Meter Volume (Cubic Meters)= 22.544
Meter Factor= 0.985
Multiple leak checks, see end of printout
Net Meter Volume (Cubic Meters)= 6.635
Gas Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Meters)= 6.691
Barometric Pressure (mm Hg)= 755
Static Pressure (mm H20)= -43
Percent Oxygen= 20.9
Percent Carbon Dioxide= 0.2
Moisture Collected (ml)= 29.1
Percent Water= 0.6
Average Meter Temperature (C)= 16
Average Delta H (mm H20)= 8.8
Average Delta P (mm H20)= 21.5
Average Stack Temperature (C)= 51
Dry Molecular Weight= 28.87
Wet Molecular Weight= 28.81
Average Square Root of Delta P (mm H20)= 4.6254
% Isokinetic= 98.5
Pitot Coefficient= 0.83
Sampling Time (Minutes)= 710.0
Nozzle Diameter (mm)= 3.73
Stack Axis #1 (Meters)= 0.927
Stack Axis #2 (Meters)= 0.970
Circular Stack
Stack Area (Square Meters)= 0.706
Stack Velocity (Actual, m/min)= 982
Flow rate (Actual, Cubic m/min)= 693
Flow rate (Standard, Wet, Cubic m/min)= 621
Flow rate (Standard, Dry, Cubic m/min)= 617
Particulate Loading - Front Half
Particulate Weight (g)= 0.0000
Particulate Loading, Dry Std. (mg/cu m)= 0.0
Particulate Loading, Actual (mg/cu m)= 0.0
Emission Rate (kg/hr}= 0.00
Corr. to 7% O2 & 12% CC
0.0 0.0
No Back Half Analysis
-------
FILE NAME - rfin2
RUN # - 2 - Method 0010 Train for POM & PAHs
PROG.=VER 06/09/89
02-17-1999 14:27:20
LOCATION - Reverberatory Furnace #1 Baghouse Inlet Duct
DATE - 1015-1035/1045-1255/1300-1530/1610-1840/1855-2315
PROJECT # - 4951.03.04.01
Point #
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
Delta P
in
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0 .
0 .
0 .
0 .
0 .
0 .
0.
0 .
0 .
0 .
0 .
0 .
0 .
0 .
0 .
0.
0 .
0 .
0 .
0 .
0 .
0 .
0.
0.
0.
0 .
0 .
0.
0.
0 .
1.
1.
1.
0.
. H20)
800
750
780
800
750
800
800
750
780
800
700
800
820
820
800
800
780
780
700
650
550
850
820
850
780
750
720
700
700
670
730
820
850
700
770
900
000
000
000
980
Delta H
(in
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
. H20)
.31
.28
.26
.28
.28
.33
.31
.28
.29
.29
.30
.35
.35
.33
.30
.32
.32
.29
.27
.20
.21
.32
.37
.37
.29
.25
.25
.26
.26
.28
.29
.36
.26
.26
. 30
.35
.38
. 38
.36
.38
Stack
(F)
140
115
200
225
200
120
120
120
130
175
110
100
90
100
120
120
140
200
160
250
140
160
100
90
175
200
200
145
200
115
140
95
300
175
150
175
175
200
200
125
T Meter T
In(F)
42
45
48
52
55
57
59
61
61
63
65
66
68
69
69
68
69
70
69
69
68
69
69
69
68
68
68
68
67
68
64
62
64
64
64
65
65
64
64
64
Out (F)
41
43
48
49
51
53
55
57
58
60
62
63
64
66
66
68
68
68
68
69
68
69
68
68
68
68
67
67
66
66
64
63
63
64
63
64
64
63
63
63
-------
: Mejhod 0010 Train for POM l ?SHs
LOCATION - Reverberatory Furnace #1 Baghouse Inlet Duct
DATE - 1015-1035/1045-1255/1300-1530/16i:-1840/1855-2315
PROJECT # - 4951.03.04.01
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
0.870
0 .870
0.800
0.800
0.850
0.940
0.940
0.940
0.940
0. 940
0.940
0.930
0 .930
0.880
0.920
0.950
0.920
0.920
0.930
0 .940
0 .940
0. 970
0. 930
0. 910
0 . 920
0 . 920
0.910
0.940
0 .940
0 . 940
0 . 940
0.36
0.33
0.33
0.33
0.37
0.42
0.42
0.43
0 .43
0.42
0.40
0.40
0 .42
0 .39
0.41
0 .41
0.40
0 .40
0 .41
0.42
0 .42
0 .46
0 .41
0 .39
0.41
0.42
0 .42
0.43
0.41
0 .41
0 .40
125
175
140
115
100
76
76
76
76
78
76
73
73
73
72
71
72
72
71
72
72
72
72
73
72
74
75
74
75
75
77
64
63
62
60
59
56
55
55
56
57
56
57
58
58
59
59
58
58
58
58
57
57
56
56
56
56
56
56
56
56
56
63
62
61
60
59
56
55
55
55
55
54
55
56
56
58
58
58
58
57
57
56
55
55
55
54
54
54
55
54
54
54
Fraction
DRY CATCH
FILTER
Fraction
Final Wt. Tare Wt. Blank Wt. Net Wt
(g) (g) (g) (g)
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Final Wt. Tare Wt
(g) (g)
PROBE RINSE 0.0000 0.0000
IMPINGERS 0.0000 0.0000
Probe Rinse Blank (mg/ml)= 0.0000
Impinger Blank (mg/ml)= 0.0000
Vol.
(ml)
0.0
0.0
Net Wt
(g)
0.0000
0.0000
Multiple leak checks used. Final readings for each segment are listed below
Lk Rate (cfm) Time (min)
0.0010 150.0000
0.0010 150.0000
0.0080 150.0000
0.0010 260.0000
-------
FILE NAME - rfout2 • PROG.=VER 06/09/89
RUN # - 2 - Method 0010 Train for POM & PAHs 02-17-1999 14:28:20
LOCATION - Reverberatory Furnace #1 Baghouse Outlet Stack
DATE - 02/12/99 Time:1015-1245/1250-1520/1535-1805/1815-2315
PROJECT ft - 4951.03.04.01
Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Feet)= 187.783
Final Meter Volume (Cubic Feet)= 377.666
Meter Factor= 1.038
Multiple leak checks, see end of printout
Net Meter Volume (Cubic Feet)= 197.099
Gas Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Feet)= 198.466
Barometric Pressure (in Hg)= 29.72
Static Pressure (Inches H20)= -0.30
Percent Oxygen= 20.9
Percent Carbon Dioxide= 0.2
Moisture Collected (ml)= 36.9
Percent Water= 0 . 9
Average Meter Temperature (F)= 61
Average Delta H (in H20)= 0.19
Average Delta P (in H20)= 0.480
Average Stack Temperature (F)= 84
Dry Molecular Weight= 28.87
Wet Molecular Weight^ 28.77
Average Square Root of Delta P (in H20)= 0.6904
% Isokinetic= 100.1
Pitot Coefficient= 0.83
Sampling Time (Minutes)= 750.0
Nozzle Diameter (Inches)= 0.147
Stack Axis #1 (Inches)= 46.0
Stack Axis #2 (Inches)= 45.7
Circular Stack
Stack Area (Square Feet)= 11.46
Stack Velocity (Actual, Feet/miri) = 2,348
Flow Rate (Actual, Cubic ft/min)= 26,917
Flow rate (Standard, Wet, Cubic ft/min)= 25,923
Flow Rate (Standard, Dry, Cubic ft/min)= 25,698
Particulate Loading - Front Half
Particulate Weight (g)= 0.0000
Particulate Loading, Dry Std. (gr/scf)= 0.0000
Particulate Loading, Actual (gr/cu ft)= 0.0000
Emission Rate (lb/hr)= 0.00
Leak Correction= O.OOOQ
Corr. to 7% O2 & 12% C02
0.0000 0.0000
No Back Half Analysis
-------
Leak Correction= 0.0000
* * METRIC UNITS * *
FILE NAME - rfout2 PROG.=VER 06/09/89
RUN ft - 2 - Method 0010 Train for POM & PAHs 02-17-1999 ' 14:28:20
LOCATION - Reverberatory Furnace #1 Baghouse Outlet Stack
DATE - 02/12/99 Time:1015-1245/1250-1520/1535-1805/1815 - 2315
PROJECT # - 4951.03.04.01
Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Meters)= 5.317
Final Meter Volume (Cubic Meters)= 10.694
Meter Factor= 1.038
Multiple leak checks, see end of printout
Net Meter Volume (Cubic Meters)= 5.581
Gas Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Meters)= 5.620
Barometric Pressure (mm Hg)= 755
Static Pressure (mm H20)= -8
Percent Oxygen= 20.9
Percent Carbon Dioxide= 0.2
Moisture Collected (ml)= 36.9
Percent Water= 0 . 9
Average Meter Temperature (C)= 16
Average Delta H (mm H20)= 4.9
Average Delta P (mm H20)= 12.2
Average Stack Temperature (C)= 29
Dry Molecular Weight= 28.87
Wet Molecular Weight= 28.77
Average Square Root of Delta P (mm H20)= 3.4797
% Isokinetic= 100.1
Pitot Coefficient= 0.83
Sampling Time (Minutes)= 750.0
Nozzle Diameter (mm)= 3.73
Stack Axis #1 (Meters)= 1.168
Stack Axis #2 (Meters)= 1.160
Circular Stack
Stack Area (Square Meters)= 1.065
Stack Velocity (Actual, m/min)= 716
Flow rate (Actual, Cubic m/min)= 762
Flow rate (Standard, Wet, Cubic m/min)= 734
Flow rate (Standard, Dry, Cubic m/min)= 728
Particulate Loading - Front Half
Particulate Weight (g) = 0.0000
Particulate Loading, Dry Std. (mg/cu m)= 0.0
Particulate Loading, Actual (mg/cu m)= 0.0
Emission Rate (kg/hr)= 0.00
Corr. to 7% 02 & 12% CO:
0.0 0.0
No Back Half Analysis
-------
FILE NAME - rfout2 PROG.=VER 06/09/89
RUN # - 2 - Method 0010 Train for POM & PAHs 02-17-1999 14:28:21
LOCATION - Reverberatory Furnace #1 Baghouse Outlet Stack
DATE - 02/12/99 Time:1015-1245/1250 -1520/1535-1805/1815-2315
PROJECT tt - 4951.03.04.01
Point #
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
Delta P
in
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0 .
0 .
0 .
0 .
0 .
0 .
0 .
0 .
0 .
0 .
0 .
0 .
0 .
0 .
0 .
0 .
0 .
0.
0 .
0 .
0 .
0 .
0 .
0 .
0 .
0.
0 .
0 .
0 .
0 .
0 .
0 .
0 .
. H20)
430
400
400
430
400
420
440
440
420
450
460
470
470
480
480
470
380
400
570
630
590
490
520
550
300
250
350
340
380
330
450
520
500
490
510
480
480
500
510
520
Delta H
(in
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
. H20)
.17
.15
.15
.17
.15
.16
.16
.17
.15
.17
. 18
.19
.19
.19
.19
.18
. 15
. 15
.23
.27
.23
.18
.20
.22
.10
.08
.12
.11
.16
.12
.18
.21
. 20
.19
.20
. 19
. 19
. 21
. 22
.23
Stack
(F)
78
93
92
99
111
105
101
95
102
105
91
82
86
89
95
105
102
113
108
98
110
123
123
114
90
92
101
113
83
111
108
91
95
108
98
101
96
77
63
60
T Meter T
In(F)
43
48
51
54
56
57
59
60
60
62
64
65
65
65
66
68
67
67
68
68
69
69
69
68
67
67
67
66
65
66
66
66
66
66
66
66
62
61
61
61
Out (F)
42
45
49
51
53
55
57
58
59
60
62
63
64
64
65
66
67
67
67
68
68
68
68
67
67
67
66
66
66
66
65
65
65
65
65
65
63
61
61
60
-------
FILE NAME - rfout2 PROG.=VER 06/09/89
RUN # - 2 - Method 0010 Train for POM & PAHs 02-17-1999 14:28:21
LOCATION - Reverberatory Furnace #1 Baghouse Outlet Stack
DATE - 02/12/99 Time:1015-1245/1250-1520/1535-1805/1815-2315
PROJECT # - 4951.03.04.01
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
0.530
0.540
0.550
0.560
0.560
0.560
0.560
0.550
0.520
0.520
0.530
0.530
0.520
0.520
0 .530
0.530
0.520
0.520
0.520
0 .520
0 .23
0 .24
0.24
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.24
0.23
0.23
0.23
0.23
0.23
0.22
0.22
0 .23
0.23
0.22
0 .22
0.22
0.22
56
57
58
58
60
59
58
57
57
55
55
55
55
56
56
56
59
59
58
59
60
61
61
60
61
61
61
61
61
61
59
57
56
55
55
55
55
55
54
55
60
59
59
59
59
59
59
59
59
59
57
56
55
54
54
54
53
53
52
52
Fraction
DRY CATCH
FILTER
Fraction
PROBE RINSE
IMPINGERS
Final Wt. Tare Wt. Blank Wt. Net Wt
(g) (g) (g) (g)
o.oooo o.oooo o.oooo o.oooo
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Final Wt. Tare Wt
(g) (g)
0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000
Vol
(ml)
0.0
0.0
Net Wt
(g)
0.0000
0.0000
Probe Rinse Blank (mg/ml)= 0.0000
Impinger Blank (mg/ral)= 0.0000
Multiple leak checks used. Final readings for each segment are listed below
Lk Rate (cfm) Time (min)
0.0040 150.0000
0.0050 150.0000
0.0020 150.0000
0.0020 300.0000
-------
40 CFR 60, APPENDIX A, METHOD 1 -
LOCATION OF TRAVERSE POINTS IN A CIRCULAR DUCT
MRI Project No
Client/Source
Source Location
Sampling Location
Date
4951 03 04 01
U S. EPA OAQPS EMAD SCO/Chip Dryer
Steele, Alabama
Chip Dryer Baghouse Iniet Duet (CS1)
02/08/99
Dimensions obtained by/from'
Data recorded by
For Run Numbers:
J Surman and A. Page
1-2
J. Surman
Port- A
Port- B
Inside of far wall to outside reference point (distance Li):
Inside of near wall to outside reference point (distance Lo):
Duct inside diameter (Li - Lo)
24.125 inches
6.375 inches
Inside of far wall to outside reference point (distance Li)'
Inside of near wall to outside reference point (distance Lo):
Duct inside diameter (Li - Lo).
Nearest flow disturbance upstream from ports:
Nearest flow disturbance downstream from ports:
Minimum number of points for velocity (nonparticulate) traverses:
Minimum number of points for particulate traverses.
Port - A Inside diameter of the duct:
Number of traverse points to be used on a diameter.
Length of port from reference point to inside surface of duct'
Cross sectional area of sampling location:
17.750 inches
23.625 inches
6 000 inches
17.625 inches
173 inches,
32 inches,
9.7 D)
1.8 D)
12
12
17 75 inches
6.38 inches
1.706 ft2
Port- A
Traverse
Point
Percent of
Duct Diameter
from Wall to
Traverse Point
Distance from
Reference
Point to
Traverse Point,
inches
4 4%
146%
29 6%
70 4%
85 4%
95 6%
7 15
897
11 63
1887
21 53
2335
Port A
Port .8
Compass Direction
Southwest
Horizontal Duct - Flow Toward Observer
Comments
M1CIRCDWK4 10/13/98 (rev M1CDIAWK4 02/17/99 11.15AM)
-------
40 CFR 60, APPENDIX A, METHOD 1 -
LOCATION OF TRAVERSE POINTS IN A CIRCULAR DUCT
MR I Project No 4951.030401
Client/Source- U.S EPA OAQPS EMAD SCG/Chip Dryer
Source Location. Steele, Alabama
Sampling Location' Chip Dryer Baghouse Inlet Duct (CS1)
Date: 02/08/99 For Run Numbers:
1-2
Dimensions obtained by/trom: J. Surman and A. Page
Data recorded by: J. Surman
Port- A
Inside of far wall to outside reference point (distance Li):
Inside of near wall to outside reference point {distance Lo):
Duct inside diameter (Li - Lo):
Port- B
Inside of far wall to outside reference point (distance Li):
Inside of near wall to outside reference point (distance Lo):
Duct inside diameter (Li - Lo):
Nearest flow disturbance upstream from ports.
Nearest flow disturbance downstream from ports:
Minimum number of points for velocity (nonparticulate) traverses:
Minimum number of points for particulate traverses'
Port - B Inside diameter of the duct'
Number of traverse points to be used on a diameter:
Length of port from reference point to inside surface of duct'
Cross sectional area of sampling location:
24.125 inches
6.375 inches
17.750 inches
23.625 inches
6.000 inches
17.625 inches
173 inches, ( 9 8
32 inches, ( 1.8
12
12
17 63 inches
6
6.00 inches
1.706 ft2
Port- B
Traverse
Point
1
2
3
4
5
6
Percent of
Duct Diameter
from Wall to
Traverse Point
44%
14.6%
29.6%
70 4%
85.4%
95 6%
Distance from
Reference
Point to
Traverse Point,
inches
677
858
11 21
18.41
21 04
2286
Port A
Port B
Compass Direction
Southwest
Horizontal Duct - Flow Toward Observer
Comments:
M1CIRCDWK4 10/13/98 (rev M1CDIB.WK4 02/17/99 11.13AM)
-------
40 CFR 60, APPENDIX A, METHOD 1 -
LOCATION OF TRAVERSE POINTS IN A CIRCULAR DUCT
MRI Project No 4951.03.04.01
Client/Source' U.S. EPA OAQPS EMAD SCG/Chip Dryer
Source Location' Steele, Alabama
Sampling Location: Chip Dryer Baghouse Outlet Stack (CS2)
Date 02/08/99
Dimensions obtained by/from:
Data recorded by: J. Surman
For Run Numbers: 1-2
J. Surman and D. Alburty
Port- A
Port- B
Inside of far wall to outside reference point (distance Li).
Inside of near wall to outside reference point (distance Lo):
Duct inside diameter (Li - Lo)'
Inside of far wall to outside reference point (distance Li):
Inside of near wall to outside reference point (distance Lo):
Duct inside diameter (Li - Lo)'
Nearest flow disturbance upstream from ports:
Nearest flow disturbance downstream from ports:
Minimum number of points for velocity (nonparticulate) traverses:
Minimum number of points for particulate traverses:
Port - A Inside diameter of the duct:
Number of traverse points to be used on a diameter:
Length of port from reference point to inside surface of duct:
Cross sectional area of sampling location'
Port- A
Traverse
Point
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Percent of
Duct Diameter
from Wall to
Traverse Point
22%
6.7%
1 1 8%
17.7%
25 0%
35 6%
64.4%
75 0%
82.3%
88 2%
93 3%
97 8%
Distance from
Reference
Point to
Traverse Point,
inches
375
477
594
728
8 94
11 34
1791
2031
21 97
2331
2448
2550
26 000 inches
3.250 inches
22.750 inches
27.500 inches
3.250 inches
24 250 inches
22 inches, (
15 inches, (
1 0 D)
0.7 D)
16
24
22.75 inches
12
325
3012
inches
ft2
Port A
Port B
Compass Direction
East
Vertical Duct - Top View
Comments
M1CIRCDWK4 10/13/98(rev M1CDOAWK4 02/17/99 1V39AM)
-------
40 CFR 60, APPENDIX A, METHOD 1 -
LOCATION OF TRAVERSE POINTS IN A CIRCULAR DUCT
MRI Project No. 4951.0304.01
Client/Source: U.S. EPA OAQPS EMAD SCG/Chip Dryer
Source Location: Steele, Alabama
Sampling Location: Chip Dryer Baghouse Outlet Stack (CS2J
Date- 02/08/99 For Run Numbers:
1-2
Dimensions obtained by/from: J. Surman and D. Alburty
Data recorded by: J. Surman
Port- A
Inside of far wall to outside reference point (distance Li):
Inside of near wall to outside reference point (distance Lo):
Duct inside diameter (Li - Lo):
Port- B
Inside of far wall to outside reference point (distance Li):
Inside of near wall to outside reference point (distance Lo):
Duct inside diameter (Li - Lo):
Nearest flow disturbance upstream from ports
Nearest flow disturbance downstream from ports
Minimum number of points for velocity (nonpartoculate) traverses:
Minimum number of points for particulate traverses
Port-B Inside diameter of the duct:
Number of traverse points to be used on a diameter:
Length of port from reference point to inside surface of duct:
Cross sectional area of sampling location
26.000 inches
3.250 inches
22750 inches
27.500 inches
3.250 inches
24.250 inches
22 inches, ( 0 9 D )
15 inches, ( 0.6 D )
16
24
24 25 inches
12
3 25 inches
3012 ft2
Port- B
Traverse
Point
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Percent of
Duct Diameter
from Wall to
Traverse Point
41%
67%
11 8%
17.7%
25.0%
35 6%
64 4%
75 0%
82 3%
88 2%
93 3%
95 9%
Distance from
Reference
Point to
Traverse Point,
inches
425
487
611
7.55
9.31
11 87
18.88
21 44
2320
2464
25.88
2650
Port A
Port B
Compass Direction
East
Vertical Duct - Top View
Comments1
M1CIRCDWK4 10/13/98(rev M1CDOBWK4 02/17/99 11.41AM)
-------
40 CFR 60, APPENDIX A, METHOD 1 -
LOCATION OF TRAVERSE POINTS IN A CIRCULAR DUCT
4951 03.04.01
MRI Project No
Client/Source- U S. EPA OAQPS EMAD SCG/Reverberatory Furnace #1
Source Location. Steele, Alabama
Sampling Location: Furnace #1 Baghouse Inlet Duct (CS3)
Date: 02/10/99
Dimensions obtained by/from: _
Data recorded by: J. Surman
For Run Numbers:
J. Surman and A. Page
1-2
Port- A
Port- B
Inside of far wall to outside reference point (distance Li):
Inside of near wall to outside reference point (distance Lo):
Duct inside diameter (U - Lo):
42.750 inches
6.250 inches
Inside of far wall to outside reference point (distance Li):
Inside of near wall to outside reference point (distance Lo):
Duct inside diameter (Li - Lo)
Nearest flow disturbance upstream from ports:
Nearest flow disturbance downstream from ports.
Minimum number of points for velocity (nonparticulate) traverses:
Minimum number of points for particulate traverses:
Port - A Inside diameter of the duct.
Number of traverse points to be used on a diameter:
Length of port from reference point to inside surface of duct:
Cross sectional area of sampling location
36.500 inches
44.500 inches
6.313 inches
38.187 inches
672 inches,
204 inches,
184 D )
56 D)
12
12
36.50 inches"
6 25 inches
7.606 ft2
Port- A
Traverse
Point
1
2
3
4
5
6
Percent of
Duct Diameter
from Wall to
Traverse Point
44%
14.6%
29.6%
70.4%
85.4%
95 6%
Distance from
Reference
Point to
Traverse Point,
inches
7.84
11 60
1705
31.95
3740
41 16
Port A
Port B
Compass Direction
South
Horizontal Duct - Flow Away From Observer
Comments.
M1CIRCD.WK4 10/13/98 (rev. M1FNIA.WK4 02/17/99 1157AM)
-------
40 CFR 60, APPENDIX A, METHOD T -
LOCATION OF TRAVERSE POINTS IN A CIRCULAR DUCT
MRI Project No 4951 03.04.01
Client/Source- U.S. EPA OAQPS EMAD SCG/Reverberatory Furnace #1
Source Location1 Steele, Alabama
Sampling Location: Furnace #1 Baghouse Inlet Duct (CS3)
Date: 02/10/99
For Run Numbers: 1-2
Dimensions obtained by/from. J. Surman and A. Page
Data recorded by: J. Surman
Port- A
Inside of far wall to outside reference point (distance Li):
Inside of near wall to outside reference point (distance Lo):
Duct inside diameter (Li - Lo):
42.750 inches
6 250 inches
Port- B
Inside of far wall to outside reference point (distance Li):
Inside of near wall to outside reference point (distance Lo).
Duct inside diameter (Li - Lo).
Nearest flow disturbance upstream from ports:
Nearest flow disturbance downstream from ports:
Minimum number of points for velocity (nonparticulate) traverses
Minimum number of points for particulate traverses:
36.500 inches
44.500 inches
6.313 inches
38.187 inches
672 inches, ( 17.6 D ;
204 inches, ( 5.3 D ;
Port- B
Port- B
Inside diameter of the duct
Number of traverse points to be used on a diameter
Length of port from reference point to inside surface of duct.
Cross sectional area of sampling location.
12
12
38.19 inches
6 31 inches
7 606. ft2
Traverse
Point
1
2
3
4
5
6
Percent of
Duct Diameter
from Wall to
Traverse Point
4.4%
14.6%
29.6%
70.4%
85.4%
95 6%
Distance from
Reference
Point to
Traverse Point,
inches
798
11.91
1761
33.20
38.91
4284
Port A
Port B
Compass Direction
South
Horizontal Duct - Flow Away From Observer
Comments:
M1CIRCD.WK4 10/13/98 (rev. M1FNIB.WK4 02/17/99 11:58 AM)
-------
40 CFR 60, APPENDIX A, METHOD 1 -
LOCATION OF TRAVERSE POINTS IN A CIRCULAR DUCT
MR I Project No
Client/Source'
Source Location:
Sampling Location
Date:
4951 03 04 01
U.S. EPA OAQPS EMAD SCG/Reverberatory Furnace #1
Steele, Alabama
Furnace #1 Baghouse Outlet Stack (CS4)
02/10/99
Dimensions obtained by/from'
Data recorded by: J. Surman
For Run Numbers
J Surman and D. Alburty
1-2
Port- A
Port- B
Inside of far wall to outside reference point (distance Li)
Inside of near wall to outside reference point (distance Lo):
Duct inside diameter (Li - Lo)
Inside of far wall to outside reference point (distance Li)'
Inside of near wall to outside reference point (distance Lo).
Duct inside diameter (Li - Lo)
Nearest flow disturbance upstream from ports'
Nearest flow disturbance downstream from ports
Minimum number of points for velocity (nonparticulate) traverses
Minimum number of points for particulate traverses
Port - A Inside diameter of the duct'
Number of traverse points to be used on a diameter
Length of port from reference point to inside surface of duct
Cross sectional area of sampling location
Port- A
Traverse
Point
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
g
10
11
12
Percent of
Duct Diameter
from Wall to
Traverse Point
2.2%
67%
11.8%
1 7 7%
25 0%
35 6%
64 4%
75 0%
82.3%
88.2%
93 3%
97.8%
Distance from
Reference
Point to
Traverse Point,
inches
7.88
996
1231
1503
1838
2324
3651
41 38
44.72
47 44
4979
51 88
52 875 inches
6 875 inches
46.000 inches
52 625 inches
6 938 inches
45 687 inches
240 inches,
108 inches,
52 D)
23 D)
16
20
46 00 inches
12
6 88 inches
11 463 ft2
Port A
Port E
Compass Direction
Southeast
Vertical Duct - Top View
Comments:
M1CIRCDWK4 10/13/98 (rev M1FNOA.WK4 02/17/99 12'00 PM)
-------
40 CFR 60, APPENDIX A, METHOD 1 -
LOCATION OF TRAVERSE POINTS IN A CIRCULAR DUCT
MRI Project No 4951 03 04 01
Client/Source' U S. EPA OAQPS EMAD SCG/Reverberatory Furnace #1
Source Location Steele, Alabama
Sampling Location Furnace #1 Baghouse Outlet Stack (CS4)
Date. 02/10/99 For Run Numbers.
1-2
Dimensions obtained Dy/trom. J. Surman and D Alburty
Data recorded by. J. Surman
Port- A
Inside of far wall to outside reference point (distance Li)
Inside of near wall to outside reference point (distance Lo):
Duct inside diameter (Li - Lo):
Port- B
Inside of far wall to outside reference point (distance Li).
Inside of near wall to outside reference point (distance Lo):
Duct inside diameter (Li - Lo):
Nearest flow disturbance upstream from ports.
Nearest flow disturbance downstream from ports
Minimum number of points for velocity (nonparticulate) traverses'
Minimum number of points for particulate traverses
Port - B Inside diameter of the duct'
Number of traverse points to be used on a diameter
Length of port from reference point to inside surface of duct:
Cross sectional area of sampling location
52.875 inches
6 875 inches
46 000 inches
52.625 inches
6 938 inches
45 687 inches
240 inches, ( 5 3 D )
108 inches, ( 24 D )
16
20
45 69 inches
12
6 94 inches
1 1 463 ft2
Port- B
Traverse
Point
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Percent of
Duct Diameter
from Wall to
Traverse Point
Distance from
Reference
Point to
Traverse Point,
inches
2.2% j 7 94
67% 10 CO
11.8%
177%
25 0%
35.6%
64 4%
75 0%
82 3%
88 2%
93 3%
97 8%
1233
1504
1 8 36
23 19
3638
41 20
4453
4723
4955
51 63
Port A
Port B
Compass Direction
Southeast
Vertical Duct - Top View
Comments.
M1CIRCDWK4 10/13/98 (rev M1FNO8WK4 02/17/99 1203PM)
-------
PITOT COEFFICIENT ADJUSTMENTS FOR GAS FLOW INCREASES CAUSED
BY PROBE BLOCKAGE DURING SAMPLING IN SMALL ROUND DUCTS
Sampling Location: Chip Dryer Baghouse Inlet Duct
in.
in.2
in.
in.
Ductl.D. = 17.69
Duct cross sectional area = 245.71
Probe sheath O.D., A = 2.5
Pitot tube face opening-to-sheath cap distance, B = 3
Pitot tube coefficient according to dimensional specification
or calibration against standard pitot tube as applicable = 0.84
Theoretical blockage (in.2) = (duct wall at port-to-pitot tube tip distance - B) x A
Number of sampling points on a diameter = 6
SAMPLING LOCATION USING ONE TRAIN
AT A CROSS SECTIONAL AREA OF THE DUCT
Theoretical blockage (in.2) at each sampling time interval during one half of a run:
Sampling
Point
Interval
#1
Interval
#6
% of duct diameter
from duct waif
1
2
3
4
5
6
34.8
4.4%
14.6%
29.6%
70.4%
85.4%
95.6%
Theoretical average blockage across one diameter = 6.39%
Decrease in pitot tube coefficient from curve* = 4.30%
Average adjusted pilot tube coefficient = 0.804
Percentage decrease in pitot coefficient vs percent blockage is taken from the curve in Figure 9b
presented in Citation 9 of 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 2
BLKG_6.WK4 01/27/99 (rev. BLKCDI6.WK4 04/07/99) -
-------
PITOT COEFFICIENT ADJUSTMENTS FOR GAS FLOW INCREASES CAUSED
BY PROBE BLOCKAGE DURING SAMPLING IN SMALL ROUND DUCTS
Sampling Location: Chip Dryer Baghouse Outlet Stack
Duct I.D. = 23.5 in
Duct cross sectional area = 433.74 in2
Probe sheath O.D., A = 2.5 in.
Pitot tube face opening-to-sheath cap distance, B = 3 in.
Pitot tube coefficient according to dimensional specification
or calibration against standard pitot tube as applicable = 0.84
Theoretical blockage (in.3) = (duct wall at port-to-pitot tube tip distance - B) x A
Number of sampling points on a diameter = 12
SAMPLING LOCATION USING ONE TRAIN
AT A CROSS SECTIONAL AREA OF THE DUCT
Theoretical blockage (in.2) at each sampling time interval during one half of a run:
Sampling Interval
Point I _ #1
% of duct diameter
from duct wall
21%
6.7%
11.
17.7%
25 0%
35 6%
64.4%
75 0%
82 3%
88 2%
93 3%
97.9%
Theoretical average blockage across one diameter = 5.24%
Decrease in pitot tube coefficient from curve* = 3.17%
Average adjusted pitot tube coefficient = 0.813
* Percentage decrease in pitot coefficient vs percent blockage is taken from the curve in Figure 9b
presented in Citation 9 of 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 2
BLKG_12WK4 01/27/99 (rev BLKCDO12WK4 04/07/99)
-------
PITOT COEFFICIENT ADJUSTMENTS FOR GAS FLOW INCREASES CAUSED
BY PROBE BLOCKAGE DURING SAMPLING IN SMALL ROUND DUCTS
Sampling Location: Reverberatory Furnace #1 Baghouse Inlet Duct
Duct I.D
Duct cross sectional area
Probe sheath O.D., A
Pitot tube face opening-to-sheath cap distance, B
Pitot tube coefficient according to dimensional specification
or calibration against standard pitot tube as applicable
= 37.34 in
= 109527 in.2
2.5 in.
3 in.
0.84
Theoretical blockage (in.2) = (duct wall at port-to-pitot tube tip distance - B) x A
Number of sampling points on a diameter = 6
SAMPLING LOCATION USING ONE TRAIN
AT A CROSS SECTIONAL AREA OF THE DUCT
Theoretical blockage (in.2) at each sampling time interval during one half of a run:
% of duct diameter
from duct wall
4.4%
14.6%
29.6%
70.4%
85.4%
95.6%
Theoretical average blockage across one diameter = 3.63%
Decrease in pitot tube coefficient from curve* = 1.60%
Average adjusted pitot tube coefficient = 0.827
" Percentage decrease in pitot coefficient vs percent blockage is taken from the curve in Figure 9b
presented in Citation 9 of 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 2
BLKG_6.WK4 01/27/99 (rev. BLKFNI6.WK4 02/17/99)
-------
PITOT COEFFICIENT ADJUSTMENTS FOR GAS FLOW INCREASES CAUSED
BY PROBE BLOCKAGE DURING SAMPLING IN SMALL ROUND DUCTS
Sampling Location: Reverberator/ Furnace #1 Baqhouse Outlet Stack
Duct I D = 45 84 in
Duct cross sectional area = 1,650 61 in 2
Probe sheath O.D , A = 2.5 in.
Pilot tube face opemng-to-sheath cap distance, B = 3 in.
Pilot tube coefficient according to dimensional specification
or calibration against standard pilot tube as applicable = 0.84
Theoretical blockage (in2) = (duct wall at port-to-ptet tube tip distance - B) x A
Number of sampling points on a diameter = 12
SAMPLING LOCATION USING ONE TRAIN
AT A CROSS SECTIONAL AREA OF THE DUCT
Theoretical blockage (in.2) at each sampling time interval during one half of a run.
% of duct diameter
from duct wall
2.2%
6.7%
11.8%
17.7%
25.0%
35.6%
64 4%
75.0%
82 3%
882%
93 3%
97 8%
Theoretical average blockage across one diameter = 3.04%
Decrease in pilot tube coefficient from curve" = 1 03%
Average adjusted pilot tube coefficient = 0.831
* Percentage decrease in pitot coefficient vs percent blockage is taken from the curve in Figure 9b
presented in Citation 9 of 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 2
BLKGJ2.WK4 01/27/99 (rev. BLKFN012 WK4 02/17/99)
-------
FIELD SAMPLING DATA FOR METHOD 5 TYPE TRAINS
Run No. / Date 2- ~ ' '/ ' S
Proiect No. tf'lS'l
Client $5 £!"£
Source C.-Htf &
Sampling Location ^
-ol-oy-oi p
tack ThermocoL
obe No. 3 -
31
ft- Vt5/C s
"l/> fait/l JfJL&T F
Train Tvoe/No. /A/-/ U
Operator t) • N&*
Record data every
Nozzle No. /X- / T
Nozzle Tip Diameter
Pitot Tube No. /W'ti
Ini
Time (24 Hr) /'£?<
Pass or Fail
<" U
ample Box No.
Iter No. tJ /
f
mbilical/lmpinge
mbilical Nos.
// j minutes Meter Box No.
ype: tfulff'l* T
"'ill m4,h
>3 cc *^r^o
S*\s
ial /J Final t,j
3^" •//.' f/7
/^/r
smp. Controller
smp. Meter No.
GM Correction
,~Jb Orifice Meter AH@ ^-.°7?
*•/ Lenath:
&L4S1 Heate
l&F-LWJuif
e> I > oo /
3 ' ft Barometer No. X
i£y^) n Barometric Pressure
- Vo>7
>?o"^ ,
?*f^**^ j\
Elevation to Meter Box "
jd Meter Box PK..
r Hookup M
/J-O-S' 3
A/r
No. A/6"
f
Y) A^J<9
-3 1^ Elevc
Sam
Stati
tion to Samplin
Dling Location P
c Pressure
>^-S\- ,
q Loc. i
"" 6 . 0 in
Assumed Moisture c < I s*°
Assu
med %C02_j2.
. .r %o, ^
nHg
ft
nHg fl[
ft
nHg
H20
%
ube Pressure Measurement System Leak Checks
Final
Initial
Final
Initial
page 1
I
I
\^ (
• —
f
of /
^
t>
OuJQRvlin.
Traverse Point Layout
Final Initial
Final
Sampling Train Leak Checks
Time (24 Hr)
Vacuum, in Hg
Leak Rate, cfm
Initial
/0,'0»
/f'fa
, oof
Final Meter Volume
Initial Meter Volume
Leak Check Volume
Final
//;ol
/$' fa
'O0<-{
$>}4M
#»/,?
-------
Run No. / Date J-'?'M
Train Type/No. A-7' / ________
Sampling Location
Project No._
Operator,
page.
of
Traverse
Point
Sampling
Time,
min.
^Q_
Clock
Time
(24-Hr)
Dry Gas Meter Reading
(Vm , ft3
Initial
7J~
Desired
Actual
Velocity
Head
(Ap),
in. H2O
Orifice Pressure
Differential
(AH),
Desired Actual
Stack
Temp.
(t.),
°F
Dry Gas Meter
Temperature
Inlet
Outlet
Pump
Vacuum,
in. Hg
Silica Ge
Impinger
Outlet
Temp.,
Probe
Liner
Outlet
Temp.
°F
Filter
Holder
Temp.
°F
XAD
Cartdg
Inlet
Temp.
A-
1L
1
112
f.o
->?.$'
1031.
114,
67
yj
~I_
113
yy
n-l
S-J
113
JW,
73
/loo
171
yy
a
A
1S"
68
v?
76
70
on.
ni
74
4-
•J&L
AJV
A3o
77
- 1
Q3>.1&8
/•
77
/.f.r
70
/33o
ens.
1.90
sr
n.
S8#i
89 J .100
f.Qo
Sf
/J-,0
886.61°
fio
n.
Remarks and Notes:
-------
40 CFR 60, APPENDIX A, METHOD 3B
INTEGRATED GAS SAMPLING DATA
Run No.
I
Date
Project No. f3r/*4j-OV-oI
Sample Type
Flow Control Device
Method 5 Meter Box
MSB Pump Type
MSB Pump No. "/jS"
Desired Sampling Rate
Leak Check Before Sampling.
Total Sampling Time 'D
Client/Source
Sampling Location
Operator
Bag Type /
/
Sample No.
Method 3B Train No.
M3B Flow Meter Tvp
MSB Flow Meter No.
Flow Rate, cc/min: Average
Estimated Total Sample Volume
cc/min r
After Sampling
min Average Flow Meter Reading
H»f Highest
ff.b
Lowest
"}-oo
liters
Time
(24-Hr)
Flow
Meter
leading
Start
Purge
Start
Sampling
Stop
Sampling
ampling
Remarks and Notes
/0/S
10 1
V
V
mr
op
M3BSAMP WPO June 18, 1998
-------
40 CFR 60, APPENDIX A, METHOD 3B, GAS ANALYSIS BY ORSAT
. #3 .
Run No.
Project No.
Sampling Location _
Analysis Start Time
Sample Type (Bag, Grab)
Analyst
Date
Sample No.
Orsat Leak Check Before Analysis:
Burrete S^t) Change in 4 Minutes
Pipettes ^P Change in 4 Minutes
Orsat Leak Check After Analysis:
Burrete Sty Change in 4 Minutes
Pipettes /w Change in 4 Minutes
Analysis
Gas
C02
O2 (Not is actual reading
minus actual CO2 reading)
CO (Net is actual reading
minus actual 02 reading)
1
Actual
Reading
1 0.e
r*
3
1 0T.9
2 £0,9
3
1
2
3
Net
Value
0,t?
^P.J
2
Actual
Reading
1 0,O
2
3
1 #e.V
2 zv>-9
3
1
2
3
Net
Value
#.{>
Z?P?
3
Actual
Reading
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
Net
Value
Average
Net
Value
(% v/v)
e^c
£o-9
Acceptance Criteria per Method 3B
C0? >4% 0.3% V/V 02 -..r-n/ n on/ . . ,. . CO
<4%» 0.2% v/v
>15% 0.2% v/v
<15% 0.3% v/v
0.3% v/v
Remarks and Notes:
MTRANAI WPD Aunusl 10 1998
-------
40 CFR 60, APPENDIX A, METHOD 3B, GAS ANALYSIS BY ORSAT
Run No.
/
. 03.
Project No.
Sampling Location
Analysis Start Time
Sample Type (Bag, Grab).
Analyst
Date
Sample No.
Orsat Leak Check Before Analysis:
Burrete /fro Change in 4 Minutes
Pipettes S^o Change in 4 Minutes
Orsat Leak Check After Analysis:
Burrete /Vb Change in 4 Minutes
Pipettes ^2> Change in 4 Minutes
Analysis
Gas
CO2
O2 (Net is actual reading
minus actual C02 reading)
CO (Net is actual reading
minus actual 02 reading)
1
Actual
Reading
1 /U0
2 /,£>
3 ,
1 #0.*>-
2 ZtD.'rl
3
1
2
3
Net
Value
/>&
J9-9
2
Actual
Reading
1 /.o
2 /,€>
3
1 fo.y
2 Z?D.>/
3
1
2
3
Net
Value
/>&
J9.IS
3
Actual
Reading
1 /,V
Average
Net
Value
(% v/v)
/,&
s 9. y
Acceptance Criteria per Method 3B
C02 >4% 0.3% v/v
, <4% 0.2% v/v
0,
>15% 0.2% v/v
< 1 5% 0.3% v/v
CO 0.3% v/v
OOS
Remarks and Notes:
4951.03 Gulp Al
MOO1O ORSAT BAG
SCRAP DRYER BH INLET SAMPLE
For disposal call: J.SURMAN
MIDWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE
M38ANAL WPD AuguSI 10, 1998
-------
SW-846, METHOD 0010 - MODIFIED SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS TRAIN (M0010)
FOR POM AND PAHs
FIELD LABORATORY TRAIN SET-UP DATA
MRI Project No. 4951.03.04.01
Client/Source: U.S. EPA OAQPS EMAD SCG / Chip Dryer
Source Location: Steele, Alabama
Sampling Location: Chip Dryer Baghouse Inlet Duct
Run No.
J
Sampling Train No.
Sample Box No.
Set-up person(s):
Transfer to Sampler:
Relinquished By
Date:
u>
Received By
Date/Time
TRAIN COMPONENT
COMPONENT NO.
LOADING DATA
Sampling Nozzle (Quartz)
Probe (Liner-Glass)
Female Probe Outlet Blank-Off
Heated Coupling & Teflon® STL
90° Bypass
.Cyclone
Filter Holder Front
Filter Holder Back with Teflon®-
coated 316 SS Filter Support
Short 90° Connector
Condenser (Standard)
XAD-2 Resin Cartridge (Standard)
Initial Weights (grams)**
Empty Loaded
or
and
Filter Type: Whatman QM-A
Thermocouple No.
-65 grams XAD-2 Resin + Surrogates
(Documentation of standards injection /s separate); resin spiked on O^O^ '9 J and maintai
near 4°C until use.
1st Impinger (Mod-GBS)
U-Connector (A)
2nd Impinger (Mod-GBS)
U-Connector (B)
3rd Impinger (GBS)
U-Connector (C)
4th Impinger (Mod-GBS)
U-Connector (D)
5th Impinger (Mod-GBS)
U-Connector (E)
6th Impinger (Mod-GBS)
Impinger Outlet Connector
Empty
ibOmLs
ASTM Type II Water
100mLs
ASTM Type II Water
Empty
— 200 g indicating silica gel
-200 g indicating silica gel
* Before and after sampling: Nozzle openings covered with methanol/methylene chloride-rinsed aluminum foil, and nozzle
placed in Ziploc® bag. Probe liner outlet sealed with glass female blank-off, and inlet sealed with Teflon® plug.
Cyclone/Bypass inlet covered (not sealed) with methanol/methylene chloride-rinsed aluminum foil. Sample transfer line
(STL) openings joined with glass/Teflon® coupling used at filter holder outlet during sampling.
** Initial weights of additional components exchanged during the run also entered here. All exchange component openings
covered with methanol/methylene chloride-rinsed aluminum foil or as described above.
* * * Cartridge weighed with blank-offs in place; then, cartridge covered with aluminum foil to seal out light during storage and
sampling.
Component Changes after Set-up and before Recovery and Other Comments:
0010SUBX WPD April 26, 1996 liev 0010SDI WPO January 29. 19991
-------
SW-846, METHOD 001 0 - MODIFIED SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS TRAIN (M001 0)
FOR POM AND PAHs
FIELD LABORATORY SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA
MRI Project No. 4951.03.04.01
Client/Source: U.S. EPA OAQPS EMAD SCG / Chip Dryer
Source Location: Steele, Alabama
Sampling Location: Chip Dryer Baghouse Inlet Duct
Run No. / Sampling Train No. J^rf"/ _ Sample Box No. /J&00 ' _
Transfer for Recovery:
Relinquished By /$,Pyts _ Received By d.Susrrrart Date/Time 03~£9-9 9
Sample box recovery person(s): *J< S*4t"rn^r7 _ Date: cff-
Probe/STL recovery person(s): t?,fJ*}-*?^
Weights below are in grams. '
RESIN CARTRIDGE AND IMPINGERS RECOVERY
Impinger: XAD-2
Cartridge* 1st 2nd 3rd _ 4th 5th 6th
Final Wt.
Initial Wt. V??, ^ 4Cy9/6
Net Wt. ~-
[ Total Condensate Collected: '&JftL* grams]
Description
and/or color: rfhlJlL' cJ^S/ GlC£S £jC£S cjt-&r /V gD
Sample Recovery: Cartridge* 1st Impinger — — -.-» Dispose of properly •- — <- — % Blue
Sample Number: ) 003 / 004
Sample Bottle Tare Wt.
Transfer impinger contents only (i.e., do not add component rinses to this sample).
Sample Bottle Final Wt.
Net Sample Wt.
Components Rinsed**: 1st impinger; combine rinses with train rinses
below (sample number XX001)
FILTER RECOVERY AND TRAIN RINSES
FILTER:
Sample Number: j 002 Description/Color:
TRAIN RINSES:
Sample Number: / 001
Sample Bottle Tare Wt.
Components Rinsed * * *: Front -- nozzle, probe liner, coupling and sample transfer line, bypass, ayslono/flook,
filter holder front;
Back -- filter support, filter holder back, short 90° connector, condenser
Sample Bottle Final Wt.
Net Sample Wt.
* Replace blank-offs and remove aluminum foil, then weigh the cartridge; replace aluminum foil to cover the entire cartridge.
** Methanol/methylene chloride (1:1 v/v) rinses 3 times; add rinses to train rinses (sample number XX001).
*** Methanol/methylene chloride (1:1 v/v) rinses with brushing of front components 3 times or more until perceivably clean,
and methanol/methylene chloride (1:1 v/v) rinses of back components 3 times, but without brushing, and including 5-minute>
soaks of underlined components 3 times.
COMMENTS:
0010RCBX WPO June 5. 1996 (feu. 0010RDI WPD January 29. 1999)
-------
Run No.
Project No.
Client C
Date
Source Ckv'fp ty^
Sampling Location
Train Type/No.
Operator 6
"?•• >
Record data every
Nozzle No. &W-
- Type:
Nozzle Tip Diameter Or
Pilot Tube No. ^"Jfl^'/il C,
minutes
FIELD SAMPLING DATA FOR METHOD 5 TYPE TRAINS
Stack Thermocouple No. j£^/}
Probe No. '5^ ' Length: "3
Liner Type (ihrt Heated? i
Sample Box No.
Filter No.
_ft
n
Orifice Meter AH@
Barometer No.
Barometric Pressure _j
Elevation to Meter Box
Meter Box Ph,, 2^1
. in Hg
ft
Umbilical/lmpinger Hookup .
Umbilical Nos. A/ f°~
Meter Box No.
|£
/ Qbti
Final Meter Volume
Initial Meter Volume
Leak Check Volume
Final
/H#
w
.Gffl-
Initial
(1S)Q
\%
.Oil
l&t. 79l
19$, n^
.M^
Final
\tfo
11.5
,oo\
Initial
Final
Initial
Final
Initial
Final
Remarks and Notes:
Meter Volume at Start of Run .
Meter Volume at End of Run
Total Leak Check Volume .
Adjusted Final Volume.
-------
Run No.
'
Train Type/No. 5\/
Date
1~°l~ ? f
Sampling Location l/CyS^
Proiect No. ^£)1'°3
Operator,
page
of
Traverse
Point
Sampling
Time,
min.
O
Clock
Time
(24-Hr)
/Oft
Dry Gas Meter Reading
(Vm , ft3
initial
Desired
Actual
Velocity
Head
(Ap),
in. H30
Orifice Pressure
Differential
(AH),
Desired Actual
Stack
Temp.
It,),
°F
Dry Gas Meter
Temperature
Inlet
Outlet
Pump
Vacuum,
in. Hg
Silica Gel
Impinger
Outlet
Temp.,
°F
Probe
Liner
Outlet
Temp.,
°F
Filter
Holder
Temp.,
°F
XAD
Cartdg
Inlet
Temp.,
°F
A-r
&JL
t,
y
111.'
o.n
15*
(el
YT
2±
1*7
gpf
&TL
1*51
63
V
V?
, v/
(,9
6?
57
1M_
10
/
S
1*
Xo
ff-6
JL
2.17*01
2ZL
V/
J^-
/*/
19]
AiL
J&-
i.t,
71/
7
zn
£.
(2,10
77
•7
HI-*
tun-5
-J2-
(,.$
55"
IZH5
y?
0.17
o.n
i
ft
7?
5
5s
5?
11
f/
r^_
ZVtL.
(1*7
&.
Remarks and Notes:
M5PO2WPD June 10. 1998
-------
40 CFR 60, APPENDIX A, METHOD 3B
INTEGRATED GAS SAMPLING DATA
Date "t-i'/y Client/Source L,
Run No. /
Project No. V/^/-'
-------
40 CFR 60, APPENDIX A, METHOD 3B, GAS ANALYSIS BY ORSAT
Run No.
Date
Project No.
Sampling Location _
Analysis Start Time
Sample Type (Bag, Grab)
Analyst JtSys'srr
Sample No. /&/ O
Orsat Leak Check Before Analysis:
Burrete /w Change in 4 Minutes
Pipettes /Vp Change in 4 Minutes
Orsat Leak Check After Analysis:
Burrete /So Change in 4 Minutes
Pipettes //£> Change in 4 Minutes
Analysis
Gas
CO2
O2 (Net is actual reading
minus actual C02 reading)
CO (Net is actual reading
minus actual 02 reading)
1
Actual
Reading
2 &, *?
3 •
1 «*%>-
2 Z'&.S"
3
1
2
3
Net
Value
0.7
/9.1s
2
Actual
Reading
1 0.9
3
1 XV,^
2 £'&,g~~
3
1
2
3
Net
Value
&?
S9.6-
3
Actual
Reading
1 0. ?
3
1 -Z?v.3~
2 #o,tZ~
3
1
2
3
Net
Value
*.*
J9.&
Average
Net
Value
(% v/v)
^ c,
s&C?
CO,
Acceptance Criteria per Method 3B
>4%0.3%v/v 02 N1co/_ MOO/../.. CO
, <4% 0.2% v/v
>15% 0.2% v/v
<15% 0.3% v/v
Remarks and Notes:
0.3% v/v
4951. OS Gulp Al J. O 1 O
MOO10 ORSAT BAG
SCRAP DRYER BH OUTLET SAMPLE
For disposal call: J.SURMAN
MIDWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE
M3BANALWPD August 10. 1998
-------
SW-846, METHOD 0010 - MODIFIED SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS TRAIN (M0010)
FOR POM AND PAHs
FIELD LABORATORY TRAIN SET-UP DATA
MRI Project No. 4951.03.04.01
Client/Source: U.S. EPA OAQPS EMAD SCG / Chip Dryer
Source Location: Steele, Alabama
Sampling Location: Chip Dryer Baghouse Outlet Stack
Run No.
/
Set-up person(s):
Transfer to Sampler:
Relinquished By J, S,
Sampling Train No.
-------
SW-846, METHOD 0010 - MODIFIED SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS TRAIN (M0010)
FOR POM AND PAHs
FIELD LABORATORY SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA
MR! Project No. 4951.03.04.01
Client/Souree: U.S. EPA OAQPS EMAD SCG / Chip Dryer
Source Location: Steele, Alabama
Sampling Location: Chip Dryer Baghouse Outlet Stack
Run No. /
Sampling Train No.
•2.
Sample Box No.
Transfer for Recovery:
Relinquished By £
Received By
Date/Time 03-
Sample box recovery person(s):
Probe/STL recovery person(s):
Weights below are in grams.
RESIN CARTRIDGE AND IMPINGERS RECOVERY
Date:
Date:
Impinger: XAD-2
Cartridge*
Final Wt.
Initial Wt.
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
5th
6th
'3
Net Wt. -/
[ Total Condensate Collected:
JL
9,9-
grams]
Description
and/or color: _
Sample Recovery: Cartridge*
Sample Number: / 008
Sample Bottle Tare Wt.
30
1st Impinger ~-.-•-. Dispose of properly ~ «- «- «-
/ 009
Blue
Transfer impinger contents only (i.e., do not add component rinses to this sample).
Sample Bottle Final Wt.
Net Sample Wt.
Components Rinsed**: 1st impinger; combine rinses with train rinses
below (sample number XX006)
FILTER RECOVERY AND TRAIN RINSES
FILTER:
Sample Number:
/ 007 Description/Color:
TRAIN RINSES:
Sample Number:
Sample Bottle Tare Wt.
/
006
Components Rinsed***: Front - nozzle, probe liner, soupling end Cimplp transfer line, bypass, filter holder front;
Back - filter support, filter holder back, short 90° connector, condenser
Sample Bottle Final Wt. /£&(*• ^
Net Sample Wt.
* Replace blank-offs and remove aluminum foil, then weigh the cartridge; replace aluminum foil to cover the entire cartridge.
** Methanol/methylene chloride (1:1 v/v) rinses 3 times; add rinses to train rinses (sample number XX006).
*** Methanol/methylene chloride (1:1 v/v) rinses with brushing of front components 3 times or more until perceivably clean,
and methanol/methylene chloride (1:1 v/v) rinses of back components 3 times, but without brushing, and including 5-minute
soaks of underlined components 3 times.
COMMENTS:
0010RCBXWPD June 5, 1996 (rev 0010ROOWPD January 29. 19991
-------
•\
FIELD SAMPLING DATA FOR METHOD 5 TYPE TRAINS
Run No. >;
Project No.
Client C/S
Source _
Sampling Location
Train Type/No.
Operator £)•
Record data
Nozzle No.
Date*
ft
minutes
Nozzle Tip Diameter
Pitot Tube No.
Stack Thermocouple No.
Probe No. 3-5" Length:
Liner Type G^^f Heated? fv) n
4
PafS
Initial
Final
Initial
Final
Initial
Final
Initial
Final
-5?
Sampling Train Leak Checks
Time (24 Hr)
Vacuum, in Hg
Leak Rate, cfm
Initial
/ £ 3f
t?"US»
/ °°'l
Final Meter Volume
Initial Meter Volume
Leak Check Volume
Final
J i ^ **'
*7 tfJ JJ£.
lij ft CT
, 00)
Tnltiai rfi
tfp.'}-
/$ M§
, ooi^^
1y(> . t/y£
qyi, . £>^.y
^,V7-5-
( Final
fltt
V'ft6-
, oo i-
Initial
Final
Initial
Final
Initial
Final
Remarks and Notes:
Meter Volume at Start of Run
Meter Volume at End of Run
Total Leak Check Volume .
Adjusted Final Volume.
Q87 •
V • 9?5"
6'
/OP1 •
-------
Run No.
'}-
Date
.
/./f
/.>•*
2L
n.
~7$
tf
/./r
/.
ft?
76
2^_
80
AT/
?{
979.
r,t>i
A5T
18
ff.o
AT
18V, ftf
83
IB
67.
61
ff.o
1$
/,
81
/coo.
in)
11
~W
f*
Remarks and Notes:
M5PG2 WPO June 18. 1998
-------
Run No.
Date
40 CFR 60, APPENDIX A, METHOD 3B
INTEGRATED GAS SAMPLING DATA
< <
Client/Source
ft t&
feSil*<ll>J(r
£"(S Of- &
-------
40 CFR 60, APPENDIX A, METHOD 3B, GAS ANALYSIS BY ORSAT
Run No.
Date
Project No.
Sampling Location
Analysis Start Time
Sample Type (Bag, Grab)
Analyst
£>/_.. Sample No.
Orsat Leak Check Before Analysis:
Burrete «Vl> Change in 4 Minutes
Pipettes /^t> Change in 4 Minutes
Orsat Leak Check After Analysis:
Burrete xV£> Change in 4 Minutes
Pipettes xv£ Change in 4 Minutes
Analysis
Gas
C02
O2 (Net is actual reading
minus actual CO2 reading)
CO (Net is actual reading
minus actual 02 reading)
1
Actual
Reading
1 /«?•
2 /.O
3
1 #>.S
1 &.*
3
1
2
3
Net
Value
/.o
/9V
2
Actual
Reading
1 /O
2 At?
3
1 ^.y
2 .^y
3
1
2
3
Net
Value
J.O
;?,i
3
Actual
Reading
1 XD
2 A •>
3
1 x'tf-V
2 ;?£>.*/
3
1
2
3
Net
Value
/.o
/?.?
Average
Net
Value
(% v/v)
y, 0
/?,y
Acceptance Criteria per Method 3B
2| >4%0.3%v/v 02 >150/Q 0.2o/ov/v CO
1 <4% 0.2% v/v <15% 0.3% v/v
Remarks and Notes:
0.3% v/v
4951.Q3 Gulp Al iZOOS
MOO10 ORSAT BAG
SCRAP DRYER BH INLET SAMPLE
For disposal call: J.SURMAN
MIDWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE
M38ANALWPD August 10,
-------
SW-846, METHOD 0010 - MODIFIED SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS TRAIN (M0010)
FOR POM AND PAHs
FIELD LABORATORY TRAIN SET-UP DATA
MRI Project No. 4951.03.04.01
Client/Source: U.S. EPA OAQPS EMAD SCO / Chip Dryer
Source Location: Steele, Alabama
Sampling Location: Chip Dryer Baghouse Inlet Duct
Run No. ^- Sampling
Set-up person(s): tj>£uy
Transfer to Sampler:
Relinquished By */ SuSsn
TRAIN COMPONENT
Train No. J.W-2.
•sfr^rr
'&s? Received By /
COMPONENT NO.
Sample Box No. /0£g&
Date: &'3''6*) -Qty
l.fc^CS Date/Time 03-0Q-39 /*J3D
\s
LOADING DATA
Sampling Nozzle (Quartz)
Probe (Liner-Glass)
Female Probe Outlet Blank-Off
Heated Coupling & Teflon® STL
90° Bypass
Filter Holder Front
Filter Holder Back with Teflon®-
coated 316 SS Filter Support
Short 90° Connector
Condenser (Standard)
XAD-2 Resin Cartridge (Standard)
Initial Weights (grams)** .
Empty Loaded
or
and
Filter Type: Whatman QM-A
Thermocouple No.
65 grams XAD-2 Resin + Surrogates
(Documentation of standards injection /s separate); resin spiked on
and maintained near 4°C until use.
1st Impinger (Mod-GBS)
U-Connector (A)
2nd Impinger (Mod-GBS)
U-Connector (B)
3rd Impinger (GBS)
U-Connector (C)
4th Impinger (Mod-GBS)
U-Connector (D)
5th Impinger (Mod-GBS)
U-Connector (E)
6th Impinger (Mod-GBS)
Impinger Outlet Connector
Empty
100 mLs
ASTM Type II Water
1 00 mLs
ASTM Type II Water
Empty
— 200 g indicating silica gel
— 200 g indicating silica gel
* Before and after sampling: Nozzle openings covered with methanol/methylene chloride-rinsed aluminum foil, and nozzli
placed in Ziploc* bag. Probe liner outlet sealed with glass female blank-off, and inlet sealed with Teflon® plug
Cyclone/Bypass inlet covered (not sealed) with methanol/methylene chloride-rinsed aluminum foil. Sample transfer Imi
(STL) openings joined with glass/Teflon® coupling used at filter holder outlet during sampling.
* * Initial weights of additional components exchanged during the run also entered here. All exchange component opening;
covered with methanol/methylene chloride-rinsed aluminum foil or as described above.
*** Cartridge weighed with blank-offs in place; then, cartridge covered with aluminum foil to seal out light during storage am
sampling.
Component Changes after Set-up and before Recovery and Other Comments:
0010SUBX WPD April 26, 1996 (rev. 0010SDI WPD January 29, 1999)
-------
SW-846, METHOD 0010 - MODIFIED SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS TRAIN (M0010)
FOR POM AND PAHs
FIELD LABORATORY SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA
MRI Project No. 4951.03.04.01
Client/Source: U.S. EPA OAQPS EMAD SCG / Chip Dryer
Source Location: Steele, Alabama
Sampling Location: Chip Dryer Baghouse Inlet Duct
Run No. *Z Sampling Train No.
Transfer for Recovery:
Relinauished Bv /}iPz&is
t/
Sample box recovery person(s):
Probe/STL recovery person(s):
Weights below are in grams.
J,J
ZW-'t Sample Box No. ;t>X£2
Received Bv zJ P,#)b*rK) £7,£r//VbV> /9,/^^-.
X s / ^
RESIN CARTRIDGE AND IMPINGERS RECOVERY
r
OSjo?)')') t?oot>
Date: t>3)o4)'$')
Date: O2)DC?J>(<5
' S
Impinger: XAD-2
Cartridge* 1st 2nd_ 3rd 4th 5th 6th
Final Wt.
Initial Wt. ^
Net Wt. -M*1} ttfi ^~,Ct~ *.$ 3,fr
\ Total Condensate Collected: /37,1) grams)
Description
and/or color: ^ht'tt, £.}c^^ cftfS' cj&2/' £J£2S £>
Sample Recovery: Cartridge* 1st Impinger -.--.-. Dispose of properly ~~~~ % Blue
Sample Number: 2 003
Sample Bottle Tare Wt.
Transfer impinger contents only (i.e., do not add component rinses to this sample).
Sample Bottle Final Wt.
Net Sample Wt.
Components Rinsed**: 1st impinger; combine rinses with train rinses
below (sample number XX001)
FILTER RECOVERY AND TRAIN RINSES
FILTER:
Sample Number: £ 002 Description/Color:
TRAIN RINSES:
Sample Number: ^? 001
Sample Bottle Tare Wt.
Components Rinsed***: Front--nozzle, probe liner, coupling and sample transfer line, bypass, oyclone/flack,
filter holder front;
Back -- filter support, filter holder back, short 90° connector, condenser
Sample Bottle Final Wt.
Net Sample Wt.
* Replace blank-offs and remove aluminum foil, then weigh the cartridge; replace aluminum foil to cover the entire cartridge.
** Methanol/methylene chloride (1:1 v/v) rinses 3 times; add rinses to train rinses (sample number XX001).
*** Methanol/methylene chloride (1:1 v/v) rinses with brushing of front components 3 times or more until perceivably clean,
and methanol/methylene chloride (1:1 v/v) rinses of back components 3 times, but without brushing, and including 5-minute
soaks of underlined components 3 times.
COMMENTS:
0010RC8X WPO June 5. 1996 |r«v 0010HDI WPD January 29. 1999)
-------
FIELD SAMPLING DATA FOR METHOD 5 TYPE TRAINS
Run No. 1- Date t-'^-°f{ S
Project No. 'Wbl—
Client C*4\Y (J&£
Source C^uppt/ \/(
Sampling Location S
Train Type/No. Sy
Operator ^A/'Vf*
Record data every
03 Pr
ack Thermocot
obe No. ^"'2-'
PM Liner Type (j\2t
•Att (7vJ"lcV Sample Box No.
pie No. L/&
Lenqth:
*4 Heate
n^t- /?
fe^U. Filter No. IJA
^*cfr"2- u
u
Tibilical/lmpmge
nbihcal Nos.
1'v minutes Meter Box No.
Nozzle No/X,^" 2— Type: Q^^A1- Te
Nozzle Tip Diameter •'-J^ in ,T(
Pitot Tube No. F* *r
Ini
Time (24 Hr) / ^7
Pnss or Full
\a Cn *%W///D
0,W /*
ial Final
J |^1A5
p(JC^
\
:mp. Controller
:mp. Meter No.
3M Correction
Pitot 1
Initial
r Hookup U.n
tift'V
Ml
No. fJI
It]
-J3 Orifice Meter AH@ '2-^13
^ ft Barometer No. yJoZf)
J? (^) n Baro
C<>5 Elevc
netric Pressure 2.7-
tion to Meter Box
Meter Box P... ^?,
"'?'7 Elevc
Sam
tion to Sampling Loc.
jlinq Location Pbnr "2-
"If in Ha
d ft
yt in Ha
Z(* ft
f,W in Ha
Static Pressure ~~ '"7 in H,O
Assumed Moisture "l-
Assu
Y) /'^1
2- %
(^
\
A/f Page 1
n A
^^^
4
V,'
~~-
^^
of /
^
— r
^
3
med %CO3 0.5 %O2 /?>j^
Traverse Point Layout
ube Pressure Measurement System Leak Checks
Final
Initial
Final Init
ial Final
Initial
Final
Time (24 Hr)
Vacuum, in Hg
Leak Rate, cfm
Initial
<7zV
1$
,
-------
Run No.
Date
Train Type/No. ?\7 0\Jf
Sampling Location
Project No.
Operator.
aw—
page .
Traverse
Point
Sampling
Time,
min.
Clock
Time
(24-Hr)
Dry Gas Meter Reading
(Vm , ft3
Initial
Desired
Actual
Velocity
Head
(Ap),
in. H2O
Orifice Pressure
Differential
(AH),
Desired Actual
Stack
Temp.
(ts),
°F
Dry Gas Meter
Temperature
Inlet
Outlet
Pump
Vacuum
in. Hg
Silica Ge
Impinger
Outlet
Temp.,
°F
Probe
Liner
Outlet
Temp.
°F
Filter
Holder
Temp.
°F
XAD
Cartdg
Inlet
Temp.
°F
33-
31.
(1,01,6
o.n
1^5-
So
±L
0,0^
Q.<32
0.0%
&L
3
ft-
1ft.
*&>. n
ML
L32L.
fiL
b
10_
tst=_
vv
.m.
M.
£2_
b~ I
80
55
i.o
(.0
(t/tfi
K
no
o.N
O.H
3£2«.
HOI, TO
IVi
,^L
jik.
12
40^,13
O.'bO
fio
l-M
-IT
**•?
frfc
19
1
10
0.1$
•LA*
M.
2fl
M
1/Lt,
IS
10 '6
ISO
JSL
Hi.
Remarks and Notes:
M5PG2.WPD June 18. 1998
-------
Run No.
Project No.
Sample Type
40 CFR 60, APPENDIX A, METHOD 3B
INTEGRATED GAS SAMPLING DATA
Client/Source
ulti-Pgro) Single-Point)
Icf
Flow Control Device tY§h«DCritical Orifice) Bag Type
Sampling Location
Operator
Method 5 Meter Box No.
MSB Pump Type ^
MSB Pump No.
Method SB Train No. _
MSB Flow Meter Type
MSB Flow Meter No.
Sample No.
HPr
/
Desired Sampling Rate
Leak Check Before Sampling.
Total Sampling Time
•L!)'
cc/min
Flow Rate, cc/min: Average _
Estimated Total Sample Volume
&_ After Sampling
min Average Flow Meter Reading
Highest
Lowest
liters
Time
(24-Hr)
Flow
Meter
leading
Start
Purge
Start
Sampling
Stop
Sampling
Sampling
Remarks and Notes
If.
?.,&
A.
Z."
2-*
1700
(1(0
?.<*
V
fgoo
l.a
M3BSAMP WPD June 18, 1998
-------
40 CFR 60, APPENDIX A, METHOD 3B, GAS ANALYSIS BY ORSAT
Run No.
Project No.
Sampling Location
Analysis Start Time
Sample Type (Bag, Grab)
Analyst
Date
Sample No.
Orsat Leak Check Before Analysis:
Burrete /Vt? Change in 4 Minutes
Pipettes S>/o Change in 4 Minutes
Orsat Leak Check After Analysis:
Burrete /rp Change in 4 Minutes
Pipettes "Q Change in 4 Minutes
Analysis
Gas
CO2
O2 (Net is actual reading
minus actual C02 reading)
CO (Net is actual reading
minus actual 02 reading)
1
Actual
Reading
1 <9iJ
2 d-fy
3 .
1 ?&£•
2 £?&,$"
3
1
2
3
Net
Value
0, ?
/$.&
2
Actual
Reading
1 f>. 9
2 ~
3
1
2
3
Net
Value
0,9
t (3 s
/ 7r(^
3
Actual
Reading
1 0, 9
2 # 5
3
1 #o^~
2 ffH>,S~
3
1
2
3
Net
Value
^•?
t f3 f
f r f{&
Average
Net
Value
(% v/v)
<# 9
/9,£?
C02 >4% 0.3% v/v
<4% 0.2% v/v
Acceptance Criteria per Method 3B
O,
>15% 0.2% v/v
<15% 0.3% v/v
CO 0.3% v/v
S20 1 O
Remarks and Notes:
4951.03 Gulp Al
M0010 ORSAT BAG
SCRAP DRYER BH OUTLET SAMPLE
For disposal call: J.SURMAN
MIDWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE
M3BANAL WPD Augusl 10. 199B
-------
SW-846, METHOD 0010- MODIFIED SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS TRAIN (M0010)
FOR POM AND PAHs
FIELD LABORATORY TRAIN SET-UP DATA
MR I Project No. 4951.03.04.01
Client/Source: U.S. EPA OAQPS EMAD SCG / Chip Dryer
Source Location: Steele, Alabama
Sampling Location: Chip Dryer Baghouse Outlet Stack
Run No.
Set-up person(s):
Transfer to Sampler:
Relinquished By J / .
Sampling Train No.
c/i
Sample Box No.
Date: 0 3 -Q Q -
Received By
Date/Time
TRAIN COMPONENT
COMPONENT NO.
LOADING DATA
or
Sampling Nozzle (Quartz)
Probe (Liner-Glass)
Female Probe Outlet Blank-Off
Heated Coupling & Teflon® STL .
90° Bypass
Filter Holder Front
Filter Holder Back with Teflon®-
coated 316 SS Filter Support
Short 90° Connector
Condenser (Standard)
XAD-2 Resin Cartridge (Standard)
(Documentation of standards injection is separate); resin spiked on
Initial Weights (grams)**
Empty Loaded
Filter Type: Whatman QM-A
Thermocouple No. 5V-yy
-65 grams XAD-2 Resin + Surrogates
and maintained near 4°C until use.
1st Impinger (Mod-GBS)
U-Connector (A)
2nd Impinger (Mod-GBS)
U-Connector (B)
3rd Impinger (GBS)
U-Connector (C)
4th Impinger (Mod-GBS)
U-Connector (D)
5th Impinger (Mod-GBS)
U-Connector (E)
6th Impinger (Mod-GBS)
Impinger Outlet Connector
Empty
100 mLs
ASTM Type
100 mLs
ASTM Type
Empty
Water
Water
-200 g indicating silica gel
— 200 g indicating silica gel
* Before and after sampling: Nozzle openings covered with methanol/methylene chloride-rinsed aluminum foil, and nozzle
placed in Ziploc® bag. Probe liner outlet sealed with glass female blank-off, and inlet sealed with Teflon® plug. Cyclone/
Bypass inlet covered (not sealed) with methanol/methylene chloride-rinsed aluminum foil. Sample transfer line (STL)
openings joined with glass/Teflon® coupling used at filter holder outlet during sampling.
** Initial weights of additional components exchanged during the run also entered here. All exchange component openings
covered with methanol/methylene chloride-rinsed aluminum foil or as described above.
*** Cartridge weighed with blank-offs in place; then, cartridge covered with aluminum foil to seal out light during storage and
sampling.
Component Changes after Set-up and before Recovery and Other Comments:
0010SUBX WPD April 26. 1996 (rev. 0010SDO WPO January 29, 19991
-------
SW-846, METHOD 0010- MODIFIED SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS TRAIN (M0010)
FOR POM AND PAHs
FIELD LABORATORY SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA
MRI Project No. 4951.03.04.01
Client/Source: U.S. EPA OAQPS EMAD SCG / Chip Dryer
Source Location: Steele, Alabama
Sampling Location: Chip Dryer Baghouse Outlet Stack
Run No. x* Sampling Train No. £/£/?•" Date:
Probe/STL recovery person(s): -f),. O.6f>T~hsi ^ ft. P£<\C/ Date:
Weights below are in grams.
RESIN CARTRIDGE AND IMPINGERS RECOVERY
Impinger: XAD-2
Cartridge* 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th
Final Wt.
Initial Wt. -fOJ'Z ytr&'Z- &<&,2~My7'J>'7 *t£3''2 &B3/7 ?0
Net Wt. —/D') 7/<(s 4,b /3tl> 3'^ 23,7
AV3
0*. >
[ Total Condensate Collected: //p^t / grams]
Description
and/or color: u^7//Zx &JC2/ g^f^X C^f^i^ &}f-f/^ /£)
Sample Recovery: Cartridge* 1st Impinger -.-.-.-, Dispose of properly *-«- ^ «-- % Blue
Sample Number: ^? 008 ^f 009
Sample Bottle Tare Wt.
Transfer impinger contents only (i.e., do not add component rinses to this sample).
Sample Bottle Final Wt. '
Net Sample Wt.
Components Rinsed**: 1st impinger; combine rinses with train rinses
below (sample number XX006)
FILTER RECOVERY AND TRAIN RINSES
FILTER:
Sample Number: ^007 Description/Color:
TRAIN RINSES:
Sample Number: ^? 006
Sample Bottle Tare Wt.
Components Rinsed***: Front -- nozzle, probe liner, eoupling-and tampls trancfof-ttrrg; bypass, filter holder front;
Back - filter support, filter holder back, short 90° connector, condenser
Sample Bottle Final Wt.
Net Sample Wt.
* Replace blank-offs and remove aluminum foil, then weigh the cartridge; replace aluminum foil to cover the entire cartridge.
** Methanol/methylene chloride (1:1 v/v) rinses 3 times; add rinses to train rinses (sample number XX006).
*** Methanol/methylene chloride (1:1 v/v) rinses with brushing of front components 3 times or more until perceivably clean,
and methanol/methylene chloride (1:1 v/v) rinses of back components 3 times, but without brushing, and including 5-minute
soaks of underlined components 3 times.
COMMENTS:
0010RCBXWPD June 5, 1396 (rev 0010RDO.WPD January 29. 19991
-------
fific
Run N
Project No.
Client _
Source .
Sampling Location
Train Type/No.
•P" *t\
Operator D-
Date
P"
/f*L&7
I
Record data every
Nozzle No. tjV-'J-
Type:
Nozzle Tip Diameter 0. *• 7
Pitot Tube No. /ff'SOtt C,
minutes
0.827
FIELD SAMPLING DATA FOR METHOD 5 TYPE TRAINS
Orifice Meter AH@
ft Barometer No. ^
Stack Thermocouple No.
Yv
. — ' Length:
Liner Type &(^^{ Heated?
f f^.' //£-jOArt TAi^LJyt' _ ..
Sample Box No.
Filter No.
n Barometric Pressure
Elevation to Meter Box
Meter Box Ph,r £
.in Hg
ft
Umbilical/lmpinger Hookup jjrl'jf" Elevation to Sampling Loc.
. in Hg
ft
Umbilical Nos. A
Meter Box No.
Temp. Controller No.
Temp. Meter No.
'DGM Correction (Y)
Sampling Location Pbar •
Static Pressure - 1,1
Assumed Moisture
Assumed "/
page 1 of.
rai
(,61 J (>
O&Sf/tl
Traverse Point Layout
Pitot Tube Pressure Measurement System Leak Checks
Time (24 Hr)
Pass or Fail
Initial
///3
/^v^r
Final
P-3.T/
/>?/^
Initial
Final
Initial
Final
Initial
Final
Initial
Final
Sampling Train Leak Checks
Initial
Final
Initial
Final
Initial
Final
Initial
Final
Initial
Final
Time (24 Hr)
I/
Vacuum, in Hg
LCfa
Leak Rate, cfm
,003
w
Final Meter Volume
Initial Meter Volume
Leak Check Volume
Remarks and Notes:
o -37?
Meter Volume at Start of Run .
Meter Volume at End of Run
Total Leak Check Volume .
Adjusted Final Volume.
M5PG1 WPD June 19. 1998
-------
Run No.
Train Type/No.
Date
Sampling Location
Project No.
Operator.
page
Traverse
Point
Sampling
Time,
min.
0:o
Clock
Time
(24-Hr)
Dry Gas Meter Reading
- J"emp
Probe
Liner
Outlet
Filter
Holder
Temp.
XAD
Cartdg
Inlet
Temp.
op
10
330. 6
70
$8
$1
/1 5°
/vr
75-
s-\
I
to
3y.ee;
0.3}
77
•73
Ho
?r
rs
$0
3$ I -11?
50
77
!
80
83
7t?
ff<
60
0,30
8'i
5-3
0.13
86
V.f
>
lot
-71/
Si
y-r
/i<2£_^
Remarks and Notes :
fift ^T /0*->
COUftS(t
M5PG2 WPD June 18. 199S
-------
Run No. //^gr 1
Train Type/No. _
Date P" - //-/ !
Sampling Location.
Project No.
/tJ<-&T
Operator,
page
Traverse
Point
Sampling
Time,
min.
Clock
Time
(24-Hr)
Dry Gas Meter Reading
(Vm , ft3
Initial V/7, /-^t
Desired
Actual
Velocity
Head
(Ap),
in. H2O
Orifice Pressure
Differential
(AH),
Desired
Actual
Stack
Temp.
(t.).
°F
Dry Gas Meter
Temperature
Inlet
Outlet
Pump
Vacuum
in. Hg
Silica Ge
Impinge
Outlet
Temp.,
°F
Probe
Liner
Outlet
Temp.
°F
Filter
Holde
Temp
°F
XAD
Cartd
Inlet
Temp.
°F
Ir
. in
0.31
5V
cf/
6.31
y.r
yy
Ho
,65-
$-00
, it-
I3o
P-V3
Ml
-3-5-
10
y-r
Wti.631
VIZ.
•65*
7?
.no
67
0.3H
0.51
flo
80
,67
0,3V
o.M
(to
fo
.67
9''
3-
S7o
, ?o
0.30
oe-
• 75"
6,3$
o,'5l
$1
//O
4K7.W
75-
/ro
/3o
^73,7/9
o.'Jt
0-31
SI
18
0-3 1
8
•f.o
0,31-
61
Iff
yr
tf
o
10
80
B°
JL
o.3(>
do
-I?'/
79
'/o
r*
Remarks and Notes:
M5PG2 WPD June 18. 1998
-------
Run No.
Train Type/No.
/ Date fr'H'J?
Sampling Location
Project No.
Operator.
- .
V- /Vtf
Page
0L-
Traverse
Point
Sampling
Time,
min.
Clock
Time
(24-Hr)
Dry Gas Meter Reading
(\/m), ft3
Initial
Desired
Actual
Velocity
Head
(Ap),
in. H20
Orifice Pressure
Differential
(AH),
Desired Actual
Stack
Temp.
(t.),
°F
Dry Gas Meter
Temperature
Inlet
Outlet
Pump
Vacuum,
in. Hg
Silica Gel
Impinger
Outlet
Temp.,
Probe
Liner
Outlet
Temp.,
°F
Filter
Holder
Temp.,
°F
Cartdg
Inlet
Temp.,
°F
y?7.
60
•7-*
0.18
81
r.r
So
81
0>!>8
81
/OP
6,3$
So
6
//o
0.3ff
^JJ
<*?/
(n
tty
JOL
17
£77
', l(7(>
• 7V
no
&U
tf-3?
81
ft
fQo
/ .
^2L
_Z1
0,33
79
r-r
S
^-»o
74
77'
ssri .
,77
Ji
5"
Ll7_
0.33
7?
r
,76
77
Remarks and Notes:
M5PG2 WPD June 18. 1998
-------
40 CFR 60, APPENDIX A, METHOD 3B
INTEGRATED GAS SAMPLING DATA
Date
if'
Run No.
Project No.
Sample Type (tMuIti J>oin±> Single-Point!
Flow Control Device
Method 5 Meter Box No..
MSB Pump
MSB Pump No.
Desired Sampling Rate
Leak Check Before Sampling.
Total Sampling Time
Client/Source 4
Sampling Location
Operator
Bag Type
lA
//Jt-(fT
Sample No. /0'5
Method 3B Train No.
MSB Flow Meter Type
MSB Flow Meter No. '/ffl
Jjif
/ 0°
cc/min
Flow Rate, cc/min: Average
Estimated Total Sample Volume
After Sampling
min Average Flow Meter Reading
/J3 Highest \oO
fru
Lowest
liters
Time
(24-Hr)
Flow
Meter
leading
Start
Purge
Start
Sampling
Stop
ampling
Sampling
Remarks and Notes
/no
//&
V
l.o
//rr
I . o
\
\
\
/Wf
\
\
1.*
\
\
\
V
/-o
\
N/
1,0
\
/.o
\
1 . 0
\
1,0
l.o
\
/. o
\
t.o
13BSAMPWTO June IB. \HSK
-------
40 CFR 60, APPENDIX A, METHOD 3B
INTEGRATED GAS SAMPLING DATA
Run No. //W^T-/ Date
Project No. _
Sample Type
Flow Control Device
Method 5 Meter Box No.
MSB Pump Type far* 'i fWiff
MSB Pump No.
Client/Source .#•
Sampling Location
^/Operator V- /*
f Bag Type A* V^on
Wlethod SB Train No. _
//w!3B Flow Meter Type
MSB Flow Meter No.
Sample No.
Desired Sampling Rate l°°
cc/min
Leak Check Before Sampling.
Total Sampling Time
Flow Rate, cc/min: Average
Estimated Total Sample Volume
Aifcf After Sampling
min Average Flow Meter Reading
/Oo Highest /Oo
Lowest
liters
Time
(24-Hr)
/IW
Flow
Meter
Reading
/.*>
/•*
l.o
1.0
l.o
l.o
l-o
/,*
l.o
1,0
J. o
f, 0
Start
Purge
Start
Sampling
Stop
Sampling
Sampling
/Iff
\
\
X
\
\
XT
\
X
V
V
\
V
\
V
Remarks and Notes
M3BSAMPWPO June 18, 1998
-------
40 CFR 60, APPENDIX A, METHOD 3B
INTEGRATED GAS SAMPLING DATA
Run No.
Date
//-?!?
Client/Source CSS
Project No. fVf'' O^-O^-ol Sampling Location
Sample Type (flyTultl-Ppinj) Single-Point) //Operator t).
Flow Control Device Wai vk, (^rJtioaHIJrificeY ' Bag Type
Method 5 Meter BoxWio'.
/
Sample No.
MSB Pump Type
M3B Pump No. /
Method 3B Train No.
MSB Flow Meter Type
MSB Flow Meter No.
Desired Sampling Rate /°o
cc/min
Leak Check Before Sampling.
Total Sampling Time
Flow Rate, cc/min: Average /QQ
Estimated Total Sample Volume
After Sampling
min Average Flow Meter Reading
_ Highest
Lowest
liters
Time
(24-Hr)
fr°SS
V-IOS-
2-Ji5~
1IW
3-1 '* T
3-)H$
}i$f
^*r
2-US"
Flow
Meter
Reading
1,0
I, o
! ,»
t,o
1.0
1.0
l.o
1 ' V
j.o
Start
Purge
Start
Sampling
Stop
Sampling
Wy
Sampling
\(
\
\
\
V
\>
V
\
V
Remarks and Notes
/7x>6 f^LL,
M3BSAMP WPD June 18. 1998
-------
40 CFR 60, APPENDIX A, METHOD 3B, GAS ANALYSIS BY ORSAT
Run No. / Date
Project No. 'J9£'S.03,C>y. 6S Sample No.
Sampling Location
Analysis Start Time
Sample Type (Bag, Grab).
Analyst fJ>
Orsat Leak Check Before Analysis:
Burrete /M> Change in 4 Minutes
Pipettes Change in 4 Minutes
Analysis
Gas
C02
O2 (Net is actual reading
minus actual CO2 reading)
CO (Net is actual reading
minus actual 02 reading)
1
Actual
Reading
1 A,^
2 0,3"
3
1 &,3
2 #;,3
3
1
2
3
Net
Value
£>,^
Jff»o
2
Actual
Reading
1 o^-
2 O.g*
3
1 £?/^
2'i?/ *?
*^;£'
tz&P
3
Actual
Reading
1 &,£
2 O,^
3
1 ^^
2 &J/3
3
1
2
3
Net
Value
fi.iT
220,6
Average
Net
Value
(% v/v)
0^"
ff0'f
Remarks and Notes:
Acceptance Criteria per Method 3B
C02 >4% 0.3% v/v
<4% 0.2% v/v
0
2 >15% 0.2% v/v
<15% 0.3% v/v
CO 0.3% v/v
JL O
4951.O3 Gulp Al
MO01O ORSAT BAG
FURNACE BH INLET SAMPLE
For disposal call: J.SURMAN
MIDWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE
M3BANAL WPD August 10. 199fl
-------
40 CFR 60, APPENDIX A, METHOD 3B, GAS ANALYSIS BY ORSAT
Run No. /
Date
Project No. V*5y,
Sample No.
Sampling Location
T-
Analysis Start Time
Sample Type (Bag, Grahl
Analyst cJ>
Orsat Leak Check Before Analysis:
Burrete /^o Change in 4 Minutes
Pipettes A/0 Change in 4 Minutes
Orsat Leak Check After Analysis:
Burrete /*b Change in 4 Minutes
Pipettes A£> Change in 4 Minutes
Analysis
Gas
CO2
O2 (Net is actual reading
minus actual CO2 reading)
CO (Net is actual reading
minus actual 02 reading)
1
Actual
Reading
1 0,0
2 O,0
3 '
1 s?O,9
2 #D.C/
3
1
2
3
Net
Value
C.D
#0, °?
2
Actual
Reading
1 Ao
2 o.o
3
1 *P.f
2 pO*1/
3
1
2
3
Net
Value
0.0
#0,c/
3
Actual
Reading
1 O
3
1 ^^9
2 20.4
3
1
2
3
Net
Value
&, O
•go. 9
Average
Net
Value
(% v/v)
O.b
#o- 9
Acceptance Criteria per Method 3B
C02 >4% 0.3% v/v
<4% 0.2% v/v
>15% 0.2% v/v
<15% 0.3% v/v
Remarks and Notes:
CO 0.3% v/v
4951.O3 Gulp Al 1 O 1 S
M0010 ORSAT BAG
FURNACE BH INLET SAMPLE
For disposal call: J.SURMAN
MIDWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE
M3BANAL WPD August 10 1998
-------
SW-846, METHOD 0010 - MODIFIED SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS TRAIN (M001 0)
FOR POM AND PAHs
FIELD LABORATORY TRAIN SET-UP DATA
MRI Project No. 4951.03.04.01
Client/Source: U.S. EPA OAQPS EMAD SCG / Side-well Reverberatory Furnace #1
Source Location: Steele, Alabama
Sampling Location: Reverberatory Furnace Baghouse Inlet Duct
Run No. / Sampling Train No. ^As"~/
Set-up person(s): O, Jif/'r?i'&-rt
Transfer to Sampler:
Relinquished By J^Lssrrt&s* Received By }
TRAIN COMPONENT COMPONENT NO.
Sample Box \
q.(P**^
J
\lo. /ZS00/
Date: 0&j
Date/Time &XJ/,'J<2
f /
LOADING DATA
bfr>
/
Sampling Nozzle (Quartz)
Probe (Liner-Glass)
Female Probe Outlet Blank-Off
Heated Coupling & Teflon® STL
90° Bypass
Initial Weights (grams)**
Empty Loaded
or
and
Filter Holder Front
Filter Holder Back with Teflon®-
coated 316 SS Filter Support
Short 90° Connector
Condenser (Standard)
XAD-2 Resin Cartridge (Standard) '
(Documentation of standards injection is separate); resin spiked on
Filter Type: Whatman QM-A
Thermocouple No.
-65 grams XAD-2 Resin + Surrogates
and maintained near 4°C until use.
1st Impinger (Mod-GBS)
U-Connector (A)
2nd Impinger (Mod-GBS)
U-Connector (B)
3rd Impinger (GBS)
U-Connector (C)
4th Impinger (Mod-GBS)
U-Connector (D)
5th Impinger (Mod-GBS)
U-Connector (E)
6th Impinger (Mod-GBS)
Impinger Outlet Connector
Empty
100 mLs
ASTM Type II Water
100 mLs
ASTM Type II Water
Empty
-200 g indicating silica gel
-200 g indicating silica gel
' Before and after sampling: Nozzle openings covered with methanol/methylene chloride-rinsed aluminum foil, and nozzle
placed in Ziploc® bag. Probe liner outlet sealed with glass female blank-off, and inlet sealed with Teflon® plug.
Cyclone/Bypass inlet covered (not sealed) with methanol/methylene chloride-rinsed aluminum foil. Sample transfer line
(STL) openings joined with glass/Teflon® coupling used at filter holder outlet during sampling.
** Initial weights of additional components exchanged during the run also entered here. All exchange component openings
covered with methanol/methylene chloride-rinsed aluminum foil or as described above.
*** Cartridge weighed with blank-offs in place; then, cartridge covered with aluminum foil to seal out light during storage and
sampling.
Component Changes after Set-up and before Recovery and Other Comments:
0010SUBXWPD April 26, 1996 (rev 0010SFI.WPD January 29, 1999)
-------
SW-846, METHOD 0010- MODIFIED SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS TRAIN (M0010)
FOR POM AND PAHs
FIELD LABORATORY SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA
MR! Project No. 4951.03.04.01
Client/Source: U.S. EPA OAQPS EMAD SCG / Side-well Reverberatory Furnace #1
Source Location: Steele, Alabama
Sampling Location: Reverberatory Furnace Baghouse Inlet Duct
Run No. / Sampling
Transfer for Recovery:
Relinquished By A, ^ff/)£s
IS
Sample box recovery person(s)
Probe/STL recovery person(s)
Weights below are in grams.
Train No. ?Tt' J Sample Box No. SZ?OO /
Received By '•
• ^
: &,tit*) D,&)bv<-*>] £7,^/V/&Ai fafe**^
1 / ^ J \s
RESIN CARTRIDGE AND IMPINGERS RECOVERY
tbZJW 60/0
Date: ^^^
Date: t>2j/X)
-------
Run No.
Project No.
Client fju,
Source
Sampling Location.
Train Type/No..
Operator.
Date
FIELD SAMPLING DATA FOR METHOD 5 TYPE TRAINS
Orifice Meter AH@
Barometer No.
page 1 of
Stack Thermocouple No.
Probe No. _$£I^ Length: .
Liner Type ^T/Affi
Sample Box No. _
Filter !"o. A//(
. Heated?^) n Barometric Pressure
/I?
Record data every \l.*J&k<••
Nozzle No. Ov3~J Type:
Nozzle Tip Diameter J.
Pitot Tube No. W M5 C
minutes
Umbilical/lmpinger Hookup .
Umbilical Nos._
Meter Box No.
//( n /*T
Temp. Controller No.
Temp. Meter No.
DGM Correction (Y)
Elevation to Meter Box (~)
Meter Box Pba, Z&Ul
Elevation to Sampling Loc. 2.O
Sampling Location Pbar
Static Pressure ~_
Assumed Moisture
Assumed %CO, 2>
. in Hg
ft
in
ft
. in Hg
in H2O
%O,
Traverse Point Layout
Pitot Tube Pressure Measurement System Leak Checks
Time (24 Hr)
Pass or Fail
Initial
\
Initial
lla%5
P
_, -Gen
8i.&$id
F^,i(fif
h.-yE^
Final
(W5
L>
>0(/^
,
Initial
('LQI(\^
1.10, %(£>
,0^7
Final
Z-^V?
L\
o&t^
Initial
"^•^/Bt'Cfrf
flflf^dfal
fOT^
Final
1
Remarks and Notes:
Meter Volume at Start of Run .
Meter Volume at End of Run
Total Leak Check Volume.
Adjusted Final Volume.
M5PG1 WPD Juna 19. 1998
-------
Run No.
Date
Train Tvpe/No. 5V
/ O\&~ 1
Sampling Location
Project No..
Operator.
-/-A
iT*-/
A.
ft?
67
ifo
a-*
0.11
7/
0.1-1
-72-
f/
A^±-
18, W
J&_
W
0,11
a. It,
7?
A2-
O.ft
87.5
2-V7
A.lf,
III-
V?
2-6
4?1'^tf
n.^o
fi.L
10=1
98
HO.I]
& So
n.tf
-U3L
O.IL
3
21
47.
o.n
Ifio
J
•5V
2X2-
o.tt
VI
Yr?
Pft
A^_
160*
Cft
m~
tt'llt
A--^
^M.
&JA-
ttf
3
if
A-to
\s
A-fo
lte_
A-/)
73,71
0.11*
A'V
77<
, IS
A-/*-
ff.lS
<3
-2.^8
A--/2-
4,00
i-u
Remarks and Notes:
M5PG2 WPD June 18, 1998
-------
Run No.
Date
Train Tvoe/No.
+A-<>O\d ~706fT t
Sampling Location
Project No._
Operator_
-v2L
-/Tr« — •
page
_2~ of
Traverse
Point
Sampling
Time,
min.
Clock
Time
(24-Hr)
'Dry Gas Meter Reading
(Vm , ft3
Initial 33,^10
Desired
Actual
Velocity
Head
(Ap),
in. H2O
Orifice Pressure
Differential
(AH),
in. H20
Desired Actual
Stack
Temp.
(ts),
°F
Dry Gas Meter
Temperature
Inlet
Outlet
Pump
Vacuum,
in. Hg
Silica Ge
Impinger
Outlet
Temp.,
°F
Probe
Liner
Outlet
Temp.,
°F
Filter
Holder
Temp.
°F
XAD
Cartdg
Inlet
Temp.
°F
s
*
nn.s
IH
ZYf
ftl
Ko
•3.6
p. 1.1
0,19
(an
vy
2.W
ft 2,
0-VL-
o.tf
Y
ZSC
21
Zffl
V?
lffi'5
\\,
0,10
Y5-
ft?
10
0,11
Ortlf
fir
Y7
ft*
\\\o
si
Y7
ftf
J32&-
6,13
JTL
25 /
2%L-
V^'
O.VL
0,12
I/1/
•Vft
ft*
_J3>
0,
-79
O.Hi
a,
to'i
-7-7
fto
1000
0.1*
f)
-7^7
2.60
22
/1 H
7?
ftt
25
77
-71
frl
lo'iO
fi.tfe
0,l\
ft 10
6,
O.llt
0,7-1
ft) to
O.
I
30
y
25
fid
^.2-7
0
0,-Ll
91$
tf/2-r-
XL
o.u*
0,1.\
igoo
0,0-t
2-5?
257
Remarks and Notes:
M5PG2.WPD Juno 18, 1998
-------
Run No.
1 Date *.-HJ
Sampling Location
page
i ram i yp
Traverse
Point
ft'"?
•7
r/
7
-7
-7
Sampling
Time,
min.
laOO
brt- 6
(e1%
(flrf,*)
(1*10
(?(eT"^>
(oWS
700
[w\vvns
Clock
Time
(24-Hr)
/2£oC)
23-11'$
14AQ
l&ft^
•£#j5
i'Knc)
Iftio
l+ftit
?">H<5
Dry Gas Meter Reading
(Vm , ft3
Initial tletitltf
Desired
tle^'ft
(l,(,,^
•tfO'0&
tT), ^
lllesfy
rt^fo
Ivjr 00
\9tlf 1^
Actual
UA'ty
(kll /,(/
///K*W
\"TH , (If
t1b,(gi
/^/3)
(<& 1(j
I%1* lie]
Velocity
Head
(Ap),
in. H20
0.%
O'^le
o,n
OMI,
0,Ltf
V'itp
o.H-i
Orifice Pressure
Differential
(AH),
in. H2O
Desired
P Z4/
6,1-1
6,l>i
0.16
f)1$
61^
0,1^
Actual
0-M
@ f I jf
O 'IsC
0,1°!
az>-
0,\<\
0,10
Stack
Temp.
°F
?5
%6
?1-
%i-
fri^
$1
ft
%(.
Dry Gas Meter
Temperature
(tj,
°F
Inlet
9^
m
8-L
rfl
I*]
l°l
T/
Outlet
92-
fa
?/
XO
13
1%
^11
Iff
Pump
Vacuum,
in. Hg
i
tf
H
H
i
u
7
i
— 7!
Silica Gel
Impinger
Outlet
Temp.,
°F
£V
vy
Vo
Y7
fl
Jo
*{4
vf
Probe
Liner
Outlet
Temp.,
°F
tyf
ttft
t£jo
M?
'L
1£^
'*«>
^il>
t&
2^1
XAD
Cartdg
Inlet
Temp.
°F
f?
^
V5
¥/
i
L^C
239
250
ZY?
2jt—
1.6 \
2-V?
iffl/
Remarks and Notes:
o(
M5PG2 WPD June 18, 1998
-------
Date
Run No. L
Project No.
Sample Type
Flow Control Device (jaj
Method B Meter Box No.
MSB Pump Type
MSB Pump No.
40 CFR 60, APPENDIX A, METHOD 3B
INTEGRATED GAS SAMPLING DATA
-//- ?? Client/Source
? Single-Point)
ritical Orifice)
Sampling Location
Operator _
Bag Type
Sample No.
/^ ISAM**-
AS ' 5
Method SB Train No.
MSB Flow Meter Type
*
f.o
1.0
ZZ.ec-
t-0
M3BSAMPWPO June 18, 1998
-------
40 CFR 60, APPENDIX A, METHOD 3B, GAS ANALYSIS BY ORSAT
Run No.
Project No.
Sampling Location _>
Analysis Start Time
Sample Type (Bag, Grab).
I v
Analyst ;
Date
Sample No.
Orsat Leak Check Before Analysis:
Burrete__A6 Change in 4 Minutes
Pipettes //D Change in 4 Minutes
Orsat Leak Check After Analysis:
Burrete /^ Change in 4 Minutes
Pipettes >£ Change in 4 Minutes
Analysis
Gas
C02
Oj, (Not is actual roadiiuj
minus actual CO2 reading)
CO (Net is actual reading
minus actual 02 reading)
1
Actual
Reading
1 &,}1
2 t.*r*
3
2*5^
3
1
2
3
Net
Value
o.V-
^
2
Actual
Reading
1 £>.*
2 4% 0.3% v/v
' <4% 0.2% v/v
>15% 0.2% v/v
<15% 0.3% v/v
Remarks and Notes:
CO 0.3% v/v
4951. O3 Gulp Al J. O 2: C
M0010 QRSAT BAG
FURNACE BH OUTLET SAMPLE
For disposal call: J.SURMAN
MIDWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE
M3BANAL WPD August 10 1998
-------
40 CFR 60, APPENDIX A, METHOD 3B, GAS ANALYSIS BY ORSAT
Run No. /_
Project No.
Sampling Location
Analysis Start Time
Sample Type (Bag, Grab).
Analyst
Date
Sample No.
Orsat Leak Check Before Analysis:
Burrete /4/tJ Change in 4 Minutes
Pipettes tf0 Change in 4 Minutes
Orsat Leak Check After Analysis:
Burrete //i) Change in 4 Minutes
Pipettes /r0 Change in 4 Minutes
Analysis
Gas
CO,
O2 (Net is actual reading
minus actual C02 reading)
CO (Net is actual reading
minus actual O2 reading)
1
Actual
Reading
1 0.O
2 O.l)
3
i^V/^
2 #£>,')
3
1
2
3
Net
Value
0.O
;?
2 #0.9
3
1
2
3
Net
Value
6.0
s?&> V
3
Actual
Reading
1 a. o
O <•» f\
3
1 ^,9
2 ^?D,9
3
1
2
3
Net
Value
0.O
•Z?O, 9
Average
Net
Value
(% v/v)
£>,£>
t?0'*?
Acceptance Criteria per Method 3B
C02 >4% 0.3% v/v
O
<4% 0.2% v/v
2 >15% 0.2% v/v
<15% 0.3% v/v
CO 0.3% v/v
1020
Remarks and Notes:
4951.O3 Gulp Al
MOO10 QRSAT BAG
FURNACE BH OUTLET SAMPLE
For disposal calls J.SURMAN
MIDWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE
M3BANAL WPD August 10. 1998
-------
SW-846, METHOD 0010 - MODIFIED SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS TRAIN (M0010)
FOR POM AND PAHs
FIELD LABORATORY TRAIN SET-UP DATA
MRI Project No. 4951.03.04.01
Client/Source: U.S. EPA OAQPS EMAD SCG / Side-well Reverberatory Furnace #1
Source Location: Steele, Alabama
Sampling Location: Reverberatory Furnace Baghouse Outlet Stack
Run No. / Sampling
Set-up person(s): Jf Su
Transfer to Sampler:
Relinquished By t), St-ir**??.
TRAIN COMPONENT
Train No. ^/7 •— /
»/o*rr^v7
&s? Received By
COMPONENT NO.
Sample Box No. /°
Date: ^///
/?, tftfevsJ-y Date/Time 0&)j))99
LOADING DATA
b?
e>9*^
Sampling Nozzle (Quartz)
Probe (Liner-Glass)
Female Probe Outlet Blank-Off
90° Bypass
Filter Holder Front
Filter Holder Back with Teflon®-
coated 316 SS Filter Support
Short 90° Connector
Condenser (Standard)
XAD-2 Resin Cartridge (Standard)
Initial Weights (grams)**
Empty _ _ Loaded
Filter Type: Whatman QM-A
Thermocouple No.
V V
_ ~65 grams XAD-2 Resin + Surrogates
{Documentation of standards injection is separate); resin spiked on 63 / DP/ 7 7 and maintained near 4°C until use.
1st Impinger (Mod-GBS)
U-Connector (A)
2nd Impinger (Mod-GBS)
U-Connector (B)
3rd Impinger (GBS)
U-Connector (C)
4th Impinger (Mod-GBS)
U-Connector (D)
5th Impinger (Mod-GBS)
U-Connector (E)
6th Impinger (Mod-GBS)
Impinger Outlet Connector
Empty
100mLs
ASTM Type
100 mLs
ASTM Type
Empty
Water
Water
-200 g indicating silica gel
-200 g indicating silica gel
* Before and after sampling: Nozzle openings covered with methanol/methylene chloride-rinsed aluminum foil, and nozzle
placed in Ziploc® bag. Probe liner outlet sealed with glass female blank-off, and inlet sealed with Teflon® plug. Bypass inlet
covered (not sealed) with methanol/methylene chloride-rinsed aluminum foil.
** Initial weights of additional components exchanged during the run also entered here. All exchange component openings
covered with methanol/methylene chloride-rinsed aluminum foil or as described above.
* * * Cartridge weighed with blank-offs in place; then, cartridge covered with aluminum foil to seal out light during storage and
sampling.
Component Changes after Set-up and before Recovery and Other Comments:
0010SUBX WPO April 26, 1996 (rev. 0010SFO WPD January 29. 19991
-------
SW-846, METHOD 0010 - MODIFIED SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS TRAIN (M0010)
FOR POM AND PAHs
FIELD LABORATORY SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA
MRI Project No. 4951.03.04.01
Client/Source: U.S. EPA OAQPS EMAD SCG / Side-well Reverberatory Furnace #1
Source Location: Steele, Alabama
Sampling Location: Reverberatory Furnace Baghouse Outlet Stack
Run No. / Sampling Train No.
Transfer for Recovery:
Relinquished By D,
Sample Box No.
Sample box recovery person(s):
JcT'-Wprobe recovery person(s):
Weights below are in grams.
Received By J . $i>
Date/Time
/
RESIN CARTRIDGE AND IMPINGERS RECOVERY
Date:
Date:
Impinger: XAD-2
Cartridge*
Final Wt. S^?,"}
Initial Wt.
Net Wt.
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
5th
6th
7.3
\ Total Condensate Collected:
Description
and/or color: tv*/
Sample Recovery: Cartridge*
grams]
1st Impinger
Dispose of properly ^ •
% Blue
Sample Number: /018 /019
Sample Bottle Tare Wt. V93S7
Transfer impinger contents only (i.e.; do not add component rinses to this sample).
Sample Bottle Final Wt.
Net Sample Wt.
Components Rinsed**: 1st impinger; combine rinses with train rinses
below (sample number XX016]
FILTER RECOVERY AND TRAIN RINSES
FILTER:
Sample Number:
/017 Description/Color:
TRAIN RINSES:
Sample Number:
Sample Bottle Tare Wt.
Components Rinsed***: Front -- nozzle, probe liner, bypass, filter holder front;
Back -- filter support, filter holder back, short 90° connector, condenser
Sample Bottle Final Wt.
Net Sample Wt.
* Replace blank-offs and remove aluminum foil, then weigh the cartridge; replace aluminum foil to cover the entire cartridge.
** Methanol/methylene chloride (1:1 v/v) rinses 3 times; add rinses to train rinses (sample number XX016).
*** Methanol/methylene chloride (1:1 v/v) rinses with brushing of front components 3 times or more until perceivably clean,
and methanol/methylene chloride (1:1 v/v) rinses of back components 3 times, but without brushing, and including 5-minute
soaks of underlined components 3 times.
COMMENTS:
0010RCBX WPO June 5, 1996 (rev 0010RFO WPD January 29. 79991
-------
Run No.
Project No.
Client
Source
> Date
c>
FIELD SAMPLING DATA FOR METHOD 5 TYPE TRAINS
Orifice Meter AH@
Barometer No.
Sampling Location
Train Type/No.
Operator '
Record data every /O
Nozzle No. JSr~7 Type:
Nozzle Tip Diameter
Pilot Tube No.
minutes
Stack Thermocouple No.
Probe No. 7 "^ Length:
Liner Type ,}'^~*- Heated?
Sample Box No. _
Filter No.
Umbilical/lmpinger Hookup
Umbilical Nos.
Meter Box No.
>-
tlH~
Barometric Pressure l(ii/.72<
Elevation to Meter Box . &
Meter Box Pb,r Pi.T"*"
Elevation to Samplinq Loc. d
Semolina Location Pb3, >7<'-J'
Static Pressure " /• 7
in Hg
ft
in Hg
ft
in Hg
inH,0
Temp. Controller No. A/4
Temp. Meter No. //6
DGM Correction (Y) ^^/
fS
Traverse Point Layout
Time (24 Hr)
Pass or Fail
Initial
ff'JSS'
FjfS
Final
&3>&
rttU
Initial
Final
Initial
Final
Initial
"•s-Final ^.-'
i •'
-v.-'^j:"'-
Initial
Final
Sampling Train Leak Checks
.) /='/>'•=>'
Initial
Final
Initial
Final
Initial
Final
Time (24 Hr)
^-
i ^J O
Vacuum, in Hg
If
6. * "Ha
Leak Rate, cfm
Off 7
00 <•/
JOl
.oat
, 008
00
Final Meter Volume
Initial Meter Volume
Leak Check Volume
6*6 .
. 97
0,35
$38
Remarks and Notes:
Meter Volume at Start of Run
Meter Volume at End of Run '7^6 «
Total Leak Check Volume
Adjusted Final Volume
M5PG1 WPO June 13. 1998
-------
r
Run No.
Train Tvpe/No.
Date
/?'??
Sampling Location
Project No.
Operator^
, y
M?
page .
of
x>C
Traverse
Point
Sampling
Time,
min.
C>
Clock
Time
(24-Hr)
Dry Gas Meter Reading
Initial
Desired
Actual
Velocity
Head
(Ap),
in. H2O
Orifice Pressure
Differential
(AH),
Desired Actual
Stack
Temp.
,
°F
Dry Gas Meter
Temperature
IU
°F
Inlet
Outlet
Pump
Vacuum,
in. Hg
Silica Gel
Impinger
Outlet
Temp.,
°F
Probe
Liner
Outlet
Temp.,
°F
Filter
Holder
Temp.,
°F
XAD
Cartdg
Inlet
Temp.
°F
/?- *
/O
3,0
ji'/O
US
.'IB
JV
tfo
JJO?
$7° •
,80
3>o
13
.33
1.0
Ml
yy
r
-70
//3.
5-??.
.So
.3'
3,=
do
61
36
Ml
r
,78
3.
r
J 0(3
£89. 387
,35"
nt
34
V2-
AM'
- 70
/to
36
P-39
,70
/30
519
,33
/oo
37
Mo
80
,37
30
37
Sro/?
01
r.*s<-K..
/3oo
,80
,31
,31*
35
VI 1
Xf
.'16
.37
1*
/33a
• vff
•jo
Wo
.30-
Wo
Mff
2-
/too
6W.W
46
3.J"
Ilio
tj-7
37
.37
/oo
P-JJ--
,$
,'37
49
r.r
y?
1~ /CO
Remarks and Notes:
M5PG2 WPD June 18. 1998
-------
Train Type/No. J'/*J'}-
. Date I-/*' 1'1
Sampling Location
Project No.
Operator
page
of
Traverse
Point
Sampling
Time,
min.
fijo
Clock
Time
(24-Hr)
Dry Gas Meter Reading
-------
Run No.
Train Tvoe/No.
Data
J*
Sampling Location
Project No.
Operator,
* /.
/- A/?aL,
page
Traverse
Point
Sampling
Time,
min.
JZ£L
Clock
Time
(24-Hr)
Dry Gas Meter Reading
-------
40 CFR 60, APPENDIX A, METHOD 3B
INTEGRATED GAS SAMPLING DATA
Run No.
Date }'l>-rr
Client/Source
/ fa
Project No.
Sample Type
- ol
/•^Sf
Flow Control Device waive/
Method 5 Meter Box No.
MSB Pump Type ^y^/^
MSB Pump No._L_A^
Single-Point)
Sampling Location
Operator d • A/'£A^
Bag Type rtfyLjQi?
Method SB Train No.
/A/Ur
Samole No. "}-o i*,'
A//A
I/5^/2«i MSB Flow Meter Type
MSB Flow Meter No.
Desired Sampling Rate
Leak Check Before Sampling.
Total Sampling Time _
cc/min
Flow Rate, cc/min: Average
Estimated Total Sample Volume
/Jo.r.^ After Sampling
min Average Flow Meter Reading
Highest
Lowest
liters
Time
(24-Hr)
Flow
Meter
leading
Start
Purge
Start
Sampling
Stop
Sampling
Sampling
Remarks and Notes
V
\
I,JL£T
/oft"
V
V
//or
r
\
//•/-T
//rr
or
o.f
\
00
N
0,$
N
V
/3to
V
\
o-
V
o.f
\
\
V
\
M3BSAMP WPD June 18, 1998
-------
40 CFR 60, APPENDIX A, METHOD 3B
INTEGRATED GAS SAMPLING DATA
Run No. JfiJlfT-l' Date S"lJ"Tf
Project No. V%"/ -OV-£>3 'Ol
Sample Type (MuTtT^PoIrjj) Single-Point)
Flow Control Device^
Method 5 Meter Box No. //o
MSB Pump Type /# /fcr^f-
MSB Pump No.
Client/Source^?-?
Sampling Location
Operator
Bag Type
Sample No.
Method SB Train No. _
MSB Flow Meter Type
MSB Flow Meter No. /^
Desired Sampling Rate
Leak Check Before Sampling
Total Sampling Time
cc/min
Flow Rate, cc/min: Average
Estimated Total Sample Volume
m After Sampling
min Average Flow Meter Reading
5"P Highest
Lowest
liters
Time
(24-Hr)
Flow
Meter
Reading
Start
Purge
Start
Sampling
Stop
Sampling
Sampling
Remarks and Notes
N;
N/
HS&
\-
\
Pofi-T
10
\
V
\
N,
\
c-.r
^L.
mo
173
o.f
\;
\/
N
X
/f'-
V
M3BSAMP WPD June 18, 1998
-------
40 CFR 60, APPENDIX A, METHOD 3B
INTEGRATED GAS SAMPLING DATA
Run No. /*/c£r. ?. Date
Project No. V7.T/
Client/Sourc^ <
Sampling Location
Sample Type (JyTulti-PoJnt? Single-Point) ^/Operator
Flow Control Device(fVa[vg}<^H5«ahQrtTjBJr Bag Type
Method 5 Meter Box No. /Vfc Method SB Train No.
MSB Pump Type y/AV/guaa-eEftSg. V>'?f*/»r-MSB Flow Meter Typ
MSB Pump No.__ /^6 MSB Flow Meter No. _£
Sample No.
A/A
Desired Sampling Rate
Leak Check Before Sampling.
Total Sampling Time
mn
Flow Rate, cc/min: Average
Estimated Total Sample Volume
. cc/min
i£ After Sampling
Average Flow Meter Reading
Highest _
O.S'
Lowest
liters
Time
(24-Hr)
/f/r
/^r
/?35"
/w
/?/r
y-oc'3-
j~0f$
>o?.y
>OjJ~
>V5'
>03-5'
Flow
Meter
leading
9*
ff>l'
c-Z
0<:>
*r
^.i"
"
^ ^
o-t
o,f
Start
Purge
Start
Sampling
Stop
Sampling
X
Sampling
\/
V
X
V
\;
X
\
N,
v
N/
Remarks and Notes
/J.«?6 i~-ycc
M3BSAMPWPO June 18, 1998
-------
40 CFR 60, APPENDIX A, METHOD 3B, GAS ANALYSIS BY ORSAT
Run No.
Project No.
Sampling Location
Analysis Start Time
Sample Type (Bag, Grab)
Analyst c/.
Date
Sample No.
Orsat Leak Check Before Analysis:
Burrete A/o Change in 4 Minutes
Pipettes Sr& Change in 4 Minutes
Orsat Leak Check After Analysis:
Burrete /^o Change in 4 Minutes
Pipettes /^o Change in 4 Minutes
Analysis
Gas
C02
O, (Not is actual marling
minus actual CO2 reading)
CO (Net is actual reading
minus actual 02 reading)
1
Actual
Reading
1 O.Z
2 d>. &
3
1 -XJ./
2 f?S.S
3
1
2
3
Net
Value
0.-2-
°
2
Actual
Reading
1 0,-z-
2 e>, -z~
3
1 ZJ.J
2 x
2 XJ./
3
1
2
3
Net
Value
&,-i—
H&, 9
Average
Net
Value
(% v/v)
4% 0.3% v/v
' <4% 0.2% v/v
°2 >15% 0.2% v/v
<15% 0.3% v/v
Remarks and Notes:
CO 0.3% v/v
4951. O3 Gulp Al 12 O O-S
MQO1O ORSAT BAG
FURNACE BH INLET SAMPLE
For disposal calls J.SURMAN
MIDWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE
M3BANAU.WPD August 10, 1998
-------
SW-846, METHOD 0010- MODIFIED SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS TRAIN (M0010)
FOR POM AND PAHs
FIELD LABORATORY TRAIN SET-UP DATA
MRI Project No. 4951.03.04.01
Client/Source: U.S. EPA OAQPS EMAD SCG / Side-well Reverberatory Furnace #1
Source Location: Steele, Alabama
Sampling Location: Reverberatory Furnace Baghouse Inlet Duct
*i Sample Box No.
Run No. ^-< Sampling Train No.
Set-up person(s): tJ, ^uSsry'Ssi
Transfer to Sampler:
Relinquished By
-------
SW-846, METHOD 0010 - MODIFIED SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS TRAIN (M0010)
FOR POM AND PAHs
FIELD LABORATORY SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA
MRI Project No. 4951.03.04.01
Client/Source: U.S. EPA OAQPS EMAD SCG / Side-well Reverberatory Furnace #1
Source Location: Steele, Alabama
Sampling Location: Reverberatory Furnace Baghouse Inlet Duct
Run No. £L Sampling Train No. 3^rf-&. Sample Box No. /£>ffgg~
Transfer for Recovery:
Relinquished By /#^%v9<£- Received By J ,£nssrf&'-' Date/Time 03hl?J99 333O
Sample box recovery person(s): d,,Su^s?7?si ~- Date:
Probe/STL recovery person(s): £?• tftL&J_, J2tS?J£itsfy £?< (y r i-f*f/sr. /?-tf'*4C^ Date:
Weights below are in grams.
RESIN CARTRIDGE AND IMPINGERS RECOVERY
Impinger: XAD-2
Cartridge* 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th
Final Wt. tfgyCff
Initial Wt.
Net Wt. —/
[ Total Condensate Collected: *<">/ grams]
Description yi>gfj7t>fo *>J
and/or color: " ? 3^ clzii li nil /Flu ik,
filter holder front;
Back -- filter support, filter holder back, short 90° connector, condenser
Sample Bottle Final Wt.
Net Sample Wt.
* Replace blank-offs and remove aluminum foil, then weigh the cartridge; replace aluminum foil to cover the entire cartridge.
** Methanol/methylene chloride (1:1 v/v) rinses 3 times; add rinses to train rinses (sample number XX011).
*** Methanol/methylene chloride (1:1 v/v) rinses with brushing of front components 3 times or more until perceivably clean,
and methanol/methylene chloride (1:1 v/v) rinses of back components 3 times, but without brushing, and including 5-minute
soaks of underlined components 3 times.
COMMENTS:
0010RCBX WPD June 5, 1996 Itev 0010RFI.WPD January 29. 19991
-------
FIELD SAMPLING DATA FOR METHOD 5 TYPE TRAINS
page 1 of.
Run No.
Project No.
Client _
Source
Sampling Location.
Train Type/No. S"l/
Operator.
Date
Stack Thermocouple No. (pO~-j
Probe No. T-k Length: g
Liner 1 ype <51'3<5'7 Heated?£y}) n Barometric Pressure
Orifice Meter AH@
Barometer No. X
Sample Box No.
Filter No.
/Vh2-
Elevation to Meter Box
Meter Box Ph,,
.in Hg
ft
Record data every
Nozzle No. (Vfr> 3
Type:
Nozzle Tip Diameter >/*"/'7
Pitot Tube No. ftf I/1!
Umbilical/lmpinger Hookup .
Umbilical Nos. |V(^"3
Meter Box No.
Temp. Controller No.
Temp. Meter No.
DGM Correction (Y)
Elevation to Sampling Loc.
Sampling Location Pbar
Static Pressure " -3
Assumed Moisture
Assumed %CO2.
.in Hg
ft
_in Hg
. in H2O
A
A/
Traverse Point Layout
Pitot Tube Pressure Measurement System Leak Checks
Timo (24 Hr)
Pass or Fail
Initial
CWl
Final
1^)2-|
&/>
IQli'ttf
•07?
Final
"t%tP
f'^
,(.
Initial
Final
Remarks and Notes:
Meter Volume at Start of Run
Meter Volume at End of Run
Total Leak Check Volume.
Adjusted Final Volume.
/
-------
Run No.
2-
Date
Train Type/No. 5V fwaffl' / •
Sampling Location
Project No._
Operator.
paqe
Traverse
Point
Sampling
Time,
Clock
Time
(24-Hr)
10 rt
Dry Gas Meter Reading
1£L
A^
OMQ
O.tf
0,15
0-HQ
AiL.
99
. 2-;
o.n
£L
ft
Zf)
o^o
^^L
JIl
^£
fi.-7-Q
6-^
O.Z1
O'/l'
Mi_
97
Y
•35
100
(155
5V
f^5_
ftn-t)
(7-6
I/O
A -
1,1
3-
r?
J2J1
Y
Mo
A--?
A-f
&.
A±.
G,l">
r
k-2
0,13
_f^_
Jtl_
37
Z3%,Qo
&-
(01,
^J~
a
C--7
fit
o&_
Q^_
J22L
(e8
A-
-------
Run No.
Date
Train Type/No, -71/
Sampling Location
Project No.
Operator.
page
of
Traverse
Point
Sampling
Time,
min.
Clock
Time
(24-Hr)
Dry Gas Meter Reading
Initial
Desired
Actual
Velocity
Head
(Ap),
in. H2O
Orifice Pressure
Differential
(AH),
in. H2O
Desired
Actual
Stack
Temp.
(ts),
°F
Dry Gas Meter
Temperature
V
0,75
0,
1,1
£-7
0-Y1
0,11-
1*1
&M-
r?
o,\<\
0,\I0
^L
17
25
m
-t
3*7,*
kk
V.5
3-7
4$o.
O.lft
H
6-5
M/Z.-5
0,10
66
15
0-*
(0\
foS
0-7
inn A
•{•$
O.U
11
6 1
4*-?'$
w
fc*_
f^rtf
^>\o,ffi-
do
do
33
- 5
o.®
(/I
Y-5
ft- Iff
33
T-&
Tar
tft
vti,
ft-U
ft- 11
U^0
fall
AAo
fan*
feoc)
to.W
Remarks and Notes:
M5PG2 WPO June 18. 1998
-------
Run No. *2-
Train Type/No. _
_ Date
Mofflo
Sampling Location
Project No.
Operator.
page
of -3
Traverse
Point
Sampling
Time,
min.
f.e"
Clock
Time
(24-Hr)
Dry Gas Meter Reading
IVJ, ft3
Initial
Desired
Actual
Velocity
Head
(Ap),
in. H20
Orifice Pressure
Differential
(AH),
in. H2O
Desired Actual
Stack
Temp.
(t,),
°F
Dry Gas Meter
Temperature
(U.
°F
Inlet
Outlet
Pump
Vacuum,
in. Hg
Silica Ge
Impinger
Outlet
Temp.,
"F
Probe
Liner
Outlet
Temp.
°F
Filter
Holder
Temp.
°F
XAD
Cartdg
Inlet
Temp.
°F
1
*L\ 10
tfo
0.1A
•5*7
^f-
0,2*?
31
IIP- 3
0-2.9-
0,23
ri
(3.2-7
£&_
0/1-1,
WrfU
Remarks and Notes:
M5POJ WPD June 18. 1998
-------
40 CFR 60, APPENDIX A, METHOD 3B
INTEGRATED GAS SAMPLING DATA
Date I-It
Run No. 2-
Project No.
Sample Type
Flow Control DeviceTVajve}) Critical Orifice)
Method 5 Meter Box No. A/3"
MSB Pump Type
MSB Pump No._
Client Source £U-
Samphng Location
Operator
Bag Type
!P
Sample No.
Method SB Train No.
MSB Flow Meter Type
MSB Flow Meter No.
Desired Sampling Rate
Leak Check Before Sampling
Total Sampling Time
cc/min
Flow Rate, cc/min: Average
Estimated Total Sample Volume
0 After Sampling
min Average Flow Meter Reading
Highest ^\>
Lowest
liters
Time
(24-Hr)
Flow
Meter
Reading
Start
Purge
Start
Sampling
Stop
Sampling
Sampling
Remarks and Notes
to t&
///f
(Wo
Z0Z.3
M3BSAMP.WPD June 18, 1998
-------
40 CFR 60, APPENDIX A, METHOD 3B, GAS ANALYSIS BY ORSAT
Run No. ^< Date
Project No. V#5X P&y/.D/ Sample No.
Sampling Location
Analysis Start Time
Sample Type (Bag, Grab)
Analyst 0_
Orsat Leak Check Before Analysis:
Burrete /v£ Change in 4 Minutes
Pipettes /^P Change in 4 Minutes
Orsat Leak Check After Analysis:
Burrete Sro Change in 4 Minutes
Pipettes Wo Change in 4 Minutes
Analysis
Gas
C02
O2 (Net is actual reading
minus actual CO2 reading)
CO (Net is actual reading
minus actual 02 reading)
1
Actual
Reading
1 C,*
2 £>.&•
3
1 &-/
2 X/'
3
1
2
3
Net
Value
&£
&t>, 9
2
Actual
Reading
1 a*.
2 £?.;£-
3
1 $?S<>
2 %;./
3
1
2
3
Net
Value
0, Z-
#&&
3
Actual
Reading
1 0,-Z-
2 o, z_
3
1 *J.>
2 #>.;
3
1
2
3
Net
Value
0. ~Z-
£o.9
Average
Net
Value
(% v/v)
/r?>-7
£0- 9
Acceptance Criteria per Method 3B
C02 >4% 0.3% v/v
<4% 0.2% v/v
0
2 >15% 0.2% v/v
<15% 0.3% v/v
CO 0.3% v/v
Remarks and Notes:
4951.03 Gulp Al ^ C
MO010 ORSAT BAG
FURNACE BH OUTLET SAMPLE
For disposal call: J.SURMAN
MIDWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE
M3BANALWPD August 10, I99B
-------
SW-846, METHOD 0010- MODIFIED SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS TRAIN (M0010)
FOR POM AND PAHs
FIELD LABORATORY TRAIN SET-UP DATA
MRI Project No. 4951.03.04.01
Client/Source: U.S. EPA OAQPS EMAD SCG / Side-well Reverberatory Furnace #1
Source Location: Steele, Alabama
Sampling Location: Reverberatory Furnace Baghouse Outlet Stack
Run No. £. Sampling Train No.
Set-up person(s): J.5V//V»»J>7
Transfer to Sampler:
Relinquished By J/
Sample Box No.
Date:
Received By
Date/Time
TRAIN COMPONENT
COMPONENT NO.
LOADING DATA
Sampling Nozzle (Quartz)
Probe (Liner-Glass)
Female Probe Outlet Blank-Off
90° Bypass
Filter Holder Front
Filter Holder Back with Teflon®-
coated 316 SS Filter Support
Short 90° Connector
Condenser (Standard)
XAD-2 Resin Cartridge (Standard)
(Documentation of standards Injection is separate}; resin spiked on
Initial Weights (grams)**
Empty _ Loaded
Filter Type: Whatman QM-A
"J I
Thermocouple No.
-65 grams XAD-2 Resin + Surrogates
and maintained near 4°C until use.
1st Impinger (Mod-GBS)
U-Connector (A)
2nd Impinger (Mod-GBS)
U-Connector (B)
3rd Impinger (GBS)
U-Connector (C)
4th Impinger (Mod-GBS)
U-Connector (Dl
5th Impinger (Mod-GBS)
U-Connector (E)
6th Impinger (Mod-GBS)
Impinger Outlet Connector
Empty
100mLs
ASTM Type II Water
1 00 mLs
ASTM Type II Water
Empty
-200 g indicating silica gel
-200 g indicating silica gel
' Before and after sampling: Nozzle openings covered with methanol/methylene chloride-rinsed aluminum foil, and nozzle
placed in Ziploc® bag. Probe liner outlet sealed with glass female blank-off, and inlet sealed with Teflon8 plug. Bypass inlet
covered (not sealed) with methanol/methylene chloride-rinsed aluminum foil.
** Initial weights of additional components exchanged during the run also entered here. All exchange component openings
covered with methanol/methylene chloride-rinsed aluminum foil or as described above.
*** Cartridge weighed with blank-offs in place; then, cartridge covered with aluminum foil to seal out light during storage and
sampling.
Component Changes after Set-up and before Recovery and Other Comments:
0010SUBXWPO April 26. 1996 (rev 0010SFOWPD January 29. 19991
-------
SW-846, METHOD 0010 - MODIFIED SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS TRAIN (M0010)
FOR POM AND PAHs
FIELD LABORATORY SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA
MRI Project No. 4951.03.04.01
Client/Source: U.S. EPA OAQPS EMAD SCG / Side-well Reverberatory Furnace #1
Source Location: Steele, Alabama
Sampling Location: Reverberatory Furnace Baghouse Outlet Stack
Sample Box No.
Run No. ^< Sampling Train No.
Transfer for Recovery:
Relinquished By P'&J&w'J'-S Received By
-------
SW-846, METHOD 0010- MODIFIED SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS TRAIN (M0010)
FOR POM AND PAHs
FIELD LABORATORY TRAIN SET-UP DATA
FIELD BLANK TRAIN
MRI Project No. 4951.03.04.01
Client/Source: U.S. EPA OAQPS EMAD SCG / Chip Dryer and Side-well Reverberatory Furnace #1
Source Location: Steele, Alabama
Sampling Location: Roof of Chip Dryer Baghouse near Outlet Stack
Run No. / Sampling Train No. OjJ7-~3
Set-up person(s): t), St4r'ms?s-?
Transfer to Sampler:
Relinquished By */<• di4/sr?frs? Received By
Sample Box No.
Date:
- 6? -
Date/Time
TRAIN COMPONENT
COMPONENT NO.
LOADING DATA
Sampling Nozzle (Quartz) fi
Probe (Liner-Glass)
Female Probe Outlet Blank-Off
Heated Coupling & Teflon® STL
90° Bypass
Filter Holder Front
Filter Holder Back with Teflon®-.
coated 316 SS Filter Support
Short 90° Connector
Condenser (Standard)
XAD-2 Resin Cartridge (Standard)
(Documentation of standards injection is separate); resin spiked on
Initial Weights (grams)**
Empty Loaded
Filter Type: Whatman QM-A
Thermocouple No.
— 65 grams XAD-2 Resin + Surrogates
and maintained near 4°C until use.
1st Impinger (Mod-GBS)
U-Connector (A)
2nd Impinger (Mod-GBS)
U-Connector (B)
3rd Impinger (GBS)
U-Connector (C)
4th Impinger (Mod-GBS)
U-Connector (D)
5th Impinger (Mod-GBS)
U-Connector (E)
6th Impinger (Mod-GBS)
Impinger Outlet Connector
Empty
100 mLs
ASTM Type
100 mLs
ASTM Type
Empty
&J3.-7
Water
Water
— 200 g indicating silica gel
— 200 g indicating silica gel
* Before and after use: Nozzle openings covered with methanol/methylene chloride-rinsed aluminum foil, and nozzle placed
in Ziploc® bag. Probe liner outlet sealed with glass female blank-off, and inlet sealed with Teflon® plug. Bypass inlet
covered (not sealed) with methanol/methylene chloride-rinsed aluminum foil. Sample transfer line (STL) openings joined
with glass/Teflon® coupling used at filter holder outlet during use.
** Initial weights of additional components exchanged during the run also entered here. All exchange component openings
covered with methanol/methylene chloride-rinsed aluminum foil or as described above.
* * * Cartridge weighed with blank-offs in place; then, cartridge covered with aluminum foil to seal out light during storage and
use.
Component Changes after Set-up and before Recovery and Other Comments:
0010SBBX WPD April 26, 1996 (rev 0010SB8 WPD January 29. 1999)
-------
SW-846, METHOD 0010 - MODIFIED SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS TRAIN (M0010)
FOR POM AND PAHs
FIELD LABORATORY SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA
FIELD BLANK TRAIN
MRI Project No. 4951.03.04.01
Client/Source: U.S. EPA OAQPS EMAD SCG / Chip Dryer and Reverberatory Furnace #1
Source Location: Steele, Alabama
Sampling Location: Roof of Chip Dryer Baghouse near Outlet Stack
Run No. / Sampling Train No. GlJ7~—<3
Transfer for Recovery:
Relinquished By P,/?)b*S/^j Received By J.
Sample box recovery person(s): c/.
Probe/STL recovery person(s): O,
Weights below are in grams.
Sample Box No.
D.&t>-f+in /?.
.
Date/Time 03/09/9'?
Date:
Date:
RESIN CARTRIDGE AND IMPINGERS RECOVERY
Impinger: XAD-2
Cartridge'
Final Wt.
Initial Wt.
Net Wt.
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
5th
6th
e>J
-£>,)
Description
and/or color:
Sample Recovery: Cartridge*
Sample Number: / 028
Overall Weight Difference:
qrams]
1 st Impinger
^ Dispose of properly ~ ~ ~ ~
Blue
Components Rinsed**: 1st impinger; combine rinses with train back rinses
below (sample number XX026)
FILTER RECOVERY AND TRAIN RINSES
FILTER:
Sample Number:
/ 027 Description/Color:
TRAIN RINSES:
Sample Number:
Sample Bottle Tare Wt.
Components Rinsed***: Front -- nozzle, probe liner, coupling and sample transfer line, bypass, filter Holder front;
FRONT
/026
Back -- filter support, filter holder back, short 90° connector, condenser
Sample Bottle Final Wt.
Net Sample Wt.
* Replace blank-offs and remove aluminum foil, then weigh the cartridge; replace aluminum foil to cover the entire cartridge.
** Methanol/methylene chloride (1:1 v/v) rinses 3 times; add rinses to train rinses (sample number XX026).
*** Methanol/methylene chloride (1:1 v/v) rinses with brushing of front components 3 times or more in the same manner as
is being done for the source sampling trains, and methanol/methylene chloride (1:1 v/v) rinses of back components 3 times.
but without brushing, and including 5-minute soaks of underlined components 3 times.
COMMENTS:
0010RBBX.WPD June 5, 1996 (rev. 0010RBB WPD January 29, 19991
-------
SW-846, METHOD 001 0 - MODIFIED SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS TRAIN (M001 0)
FOR POM AND PAHs
FIELD REAGENT BLANK PREPARATION DATA
MRI Project No. 4951.03.04.01
Client/Source: U.S. EPA OAQPS EMAD SCG / Chip Dryer and Reverberatory Furnace #1
Source Location: Steele, Alabama
Sampling Location(s): All locations
Blank(s) Prepared By: J ', £i4Sm3jn _ Date:
Weights below are in grams.
Sample Bottle Tare Bottle Gross Net Sample
_ Reagent Blank Description _ Number Weight Weight Weight
Methanol to be archived
Volume needed: 400 mLs
Lot Number: D33 J 021
Methylene chloride to be archived
Volume needed: 400 mLs
Lot Number: 8ti6L>3 j 022
Filter to be archived
Type: Whatman QM-A
Lot Number: 4<£"3&,(e> _ / 023
XAD Cartridge to be archived
Cartridge Number: //^ _ 1 024
ASTM Type II Water to be archived
Volume needed: 200 mLs
Lot Number: /#? Zj.^)?? I 025
' / /
NOTE: Lots may be identified above by a manufacturer's lot number or by the date of reagent preparation. If different lots of
a particular reagent are used, indicate the applicable test and/or run number(s) and sampling tocation(s) where the
train(s) loaded and/or recovered with that reagent are used (i.e., list each reagent blank sample number with the
applicable test and/or run number(s) and sampling location(s) below).
Sample Number For Test and/or Run Number(s) For Sampling Location(s)
COMMENTS:
0010BLBXWPD July 10. 1997 Uev 0010BLB WPD January 28, 19991
-------
VELOCITY TRAVERSE DATA
Project No.
Run No.
Plant
Date
Sampling Location „, v
Operators) (Zriffr>- - . _-,
Barometric Pressure, in. Hg
Site to Barometer Elevation
Corrected Barometric Pressure
Pitot No. /*/A?T Pilot Cp
T/C No.
ft.
H2O
Stack Area, sq.ft. .
Static Pressure, in.
Assumed Moisture, %
Assumed %CO2
-------
VELOCITY TRAVERSE DATA
Project No.
Run No. frz.
Plant s~, /*>
• o2>
Date
Sampling Lcation
Operator(s)
Barometric Pressure; in. Hg
Site to Barometer Elevation
Corrected Barometric Pressure ,
/Pitot No. x»?v;g£ Pitot Cp ,8/f.
IJ/C No. g*-/7 Temp. Meter No.
Stack Area, sq.ft.
ft.
Static Pressure, in. H2O
Assumed Moisture, %
Assumed %CO2 £>.*)
Initial Pitot Leak Check
Final Pitot Leak Check
Comments: •£$ /
Assumed %O2
@»
Start Time
Traverse Point Layout
End Time
A- 8 r
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
V
5-
f
VELOCITY
HEAD, Ap
in. H0
.10
^3.
•^L
.n
i-t,
0.&Z
STACK
TEMP.
°F
J31+-
1-7?"
(SI
1¥L
m
m
ROTATION
ANGLE
a
+7
o
-7
O
+
+9
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
VELOCITY
HEAD, Ap
in. H20
STACK
TEMP.
°F
ROTATION
ANGLE
a.
,
SEV surfrm 020393
-------
Appendix C
Sample Collection Calibration Data
MR1-AEDXR4951-03-0-4-01 «pd
-------
METHOD 5 METERING CONSOLE CALIBRATION WITH CRITICAL ORIFICE
MRI Project No.
Date:
Operator:
4951-03-04-01
3-16-99
Daniel Neal
Metering Console No.
Previous Dry Gas Meter Factor (Y):
Calibrated Critical Orifice No.
Critical Orifice Coefficient in English Units (K1):
Ambient Temperature Meter No.
N1
1.019
D19
0.51210
Y-0815
CALIBRATION GAS VOLUME DATA
Initial Dry Gas Meter Gas Volume, ft.3
Final Dry Gas Meter Gas Volume, ft.3
Net Dry Gas Meter Gas Volume (Vm), ft.3
CALIBRATION CONDITIONS DATA
Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F:
Initial Inlet Temperature, °F
Final Inlet Temperature, °F
Initial Outlet Temperature, °F
Final Outlet Temperature, °F
Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature (tm), °F
Time, seconds
Orifice Meter De!ta-H, inches w.c.
Barometric Pressure, in. Hg
Critical Orifice Inlet (Ambient) Temperature, °F:
Initial Ambient Temperature, °F
Final Ambient Temperature, °F
Avg. Critical Orifice Inlet Temperature (tamb), °F
Pump Vacuum, in. Hg
COMPUTED CALIBRATION RESULTS
Critical Orifice Gas Volume (Vcr (std)), std. ft.3
Dry Gas Meter Gas Volume (Vm (std)), std. ft.3
Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor (Y)
Orifice Meter DeIta-H@
AVERAGE CALIBRATION RESULTS
Average Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor (Y)
Average Orifice Meter Delta-H@
CALIBRATION RESULTS COMPARISON
Criterion- Y Must Be Within 2% Of Average Y
Percent Difference Of Y From Average Y
Tolerance Result
COMPARISON WITH PRETEST RESULTS
Criterion: Y Must Be Within 5% Of Previous Y
% Difference Of Average Y From Previous Y
Tolerance Result
Y= 1005599109116136 |
Run 1
523.000
529.669
6.669
81.0
81.0
78.0
78.0
" 79.5
600
1.500
28.99
79.0
79.2
79.1
18
6.396
6.348
1 .008
1.971
1.006
1.973
0.20%
'PASS
1.32%
PASS
Run 2
529.669
536.361
6.692
81.0
81.0
78.0
78.0
79.5
600
1.500
28.99
80.2
80.4
80.3
18
6.389
6.370
1.003
1.975
0.26%
PASS
Run 3
536.361
543.038
6.67"7
81.0
82.0
78.0
78.0
79.8
600
1.500
28.99
80.4
79.2
79.8
18
6.392
6.352
1.006
1.972
0.06%
PASS
Remarks:
CRORCALB.WK4 10/24/96 (rev. 4951 POST.WK4 03/16/99 02:02 PM)
-------
CONSOLE CALIBRATION WORKSHEET
Job No. 4951-03-04-01 Console No. Nl
Date 3-16-99 Orifice No. D19
Performed By Daniel Neal K Factor 0.5121
Barometer 28 . 99 in. Hg. Previous Y 1.019
NOTE; Prior to running calibration, connect mercury manometer
to sample orifice. Turn on pump and bring mercury manometer up
to 18.0 in. Hg. Record mercury manometer and console vacuum
gauge readings below. Insert critical orifice into console
sample orifice. Set console vacuum gauge at 18.0 in. Hg. +/-
the console vacuum gauge correction factor calculated below.
Mercury manometer readings: 9.1 + 8.9 = 18.0 In. Hg.
Console vacuum gauge reading: - 18.0 In. Hg.
Console vacuum gauge correction factor: 0 . 0 In. Hg.
RUN #1 RUN #2 RUN #3
DGM Initial Volume:
Initial: 523.000 529.669 536.361
Final: 529.669 536.361 543 .038
DGM Inlet Temperature:
Initial: 81 81 81
Final: 81 81 82
DGM Outlet Temperature:
Initial: 78 78 78
Final: 78 78 78
Time of run ( In Seconds ): 600 600 600
Orifice Delta H (in. H2O) : 1.5 1.5 1.5
Room Temperature:
Initial: 79.0 80.2 80.4
Final: 79.2 80.4 79.2
Pump Vacuum (in. Hg ): 18.0 18.0 18.0
Calibration Rccords\Calibration Forms\concalws4d.doc Revised 02/03/99
-------
M5 CONSOLE POST TEST CHECKLIST
Job No.
4951-03-04-01
Date
3-16-99
Console No.
Nl
Performed By
Daniel Neal
Place a check (in black ink) in the space provided after the
required checks are performed.
_X Perform positive leak check of Delta H manometer.
(See back of this sheet.)
2
3
4
5
X
Leak check Delta P manometer.
N/A Clean pump.
X Clean muffler jar(s).
X Inspect/refill oiler jar.
6. X Calibrate DGM thermocouples:
(Note : Reading must be
Within +/-2.5°F)
DGM Inlet:
DGM Outlet:
Reference
Pyrometer
68.4
68.4
Console
Pyrometer
68
68
7.
X
Digital clock/timer in place and functional.
X Vacuum check. (Leak check at 25 in. Hg. vacuum. Leak
rate should be zero.)
Check indicator lights.
Check thermocouple switched.
Check fan.
Check pump heater.
Check heat controllers.
Check Orsat pump and rotameter.
If any of the above items were replaced or repaired, please
document that information below:
9.
10 .
11.
12.
13 .
14 .
X
X
X
X
X
X
Calibration Rccords\Calibration Forms\M5chcck.doc
Revised 10/28/98
-------
METHOD 5 METERING CONSOLE CALIBRATION WITH CRITICAL ORIFICE
MRI Project No. 4951-03-04-01
Date: 02/03/99
Operator: D. Neal
Metering Console No.
Previous Dry Gas Meter Factor (Y):
Calibrated Critical Orifice No.
II Critical Orifice Coefficient in English Units (K1):
CALIBRATION GAS VOLUME DATA
Initial Dry Gas Meter Gas Volume, ft.3
Final Dry Gas Meter Gas Volume, ft.3
Net Dry Gas Meter Gas Volume (Vm), ft.3
CALIBRATION CONDITIONS DATA
Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F:
Initial Inlet Temperature, °F
Final Inlet Temperature, °F
Initial Outlet Temperature, °F
Final Outlet Temperature, °F
Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature (tm), °F
Time, seconds
Orifice Meter Delta-H, inches w.c.
Barometric Pressure, in. Hg
Critical Orifice Inlet (Ambient) Temperature, °F.
Initial Ambient Temperature, °F
Final Ambient Temperature, °F
Avg. Critical Orifice Inlet Temperature (tamb), °F
Pump Vacuum, in. Hg
COMPUTED CALIBRATION RESULTS
Critical Orifice Gas Volume (Vcr (std)), std. ft.3
Dry Gas Meter Gas Volume (Vm (std)), std. ft.3
Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor (Y)
Orifice Meter Delta-H@
AVERAGE CALIBRATION RESULTS
Average Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor (Y)
Average Orifice Meter Delta-H@
Ambient Temperature Meter No.
Run 1 Run 2
221.701 227.425
227.425 233.159
5.724 5.734
82.0 82.0
" "82.0 " 82.0
7976 " " 79.0
79.0 " ""79.0
80.5 " "I " 8075 "
100 " " 600"
1.200 1.200
28.72 " 28.72
80.4 79.8
""78.6 " 81.0
"79.5 " 80.4
"18 " 18
5.493 5.488
~ 5.384 " "5"393
1.020 1.018
"2.111 "" 2.114
N1
1.013
D16 ;
0.44410
Y-0815 •
Run3
233.159
238.885
5.726 :
82.0
83.0"
79.0" i!
"~ 79.0
80.8
600
" 1 .200 " i
" 28.72
80.6 :
81.4
81 0 '
18
5.485 ',
5.383
1.019
" 2.115
1.019
"2.113
CALIBRATION RESULTS COMPARISON
'. Criterion: Y Must Be Within 2% Of Average Y \
i Percent Difference Of Y From Average Y 0.13% 0.13%
Tolerance Result | ~ PASS ! PASS
; COMPARISON WITH PRETEST RESULTS
Criterion: Y Must Be Within 5% Of Previous Y
% Difference Of Average Y From Previous Y 0.59%
Tolerance Result PASS i
Y = 1 019000018119022 i
Remarks:
i
0.00% i
PASS
CRORCALB.WK4 10/24/96 (rev. 4951PRE1 WK4 02/03/99 01'40PM)
-------
METHOD 5 METERING CONSOLE CALIBRATION WITH CRITICAL ORIFICE
MRI Project No.
Date:
Operator:
4951-03-04-01
3-4-99
D. Neal
Metering Console No.
Previous Dry Gas Meter Factor (Y):
Calibrated Critical Orifice No.
Critical Orifice Coefficient in English Units (K1):
|| Ambient Temperature Meter No.
N5
1.038
D12
0.32080
Y-0815
CALIBRATION GAS VOLUME DATA
Initial Dry Gas Meter Gas Volume, ft.3
Final Dry Gas Meter Gas Volume, ft.3
Net Dry Gas Meter Gas Volume (Vm), ft.3
CALIBRATION CONDITIONS DATA
Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F:
Initial Inlet Temperature, °F
Final Inlet Temperature, °F
Initial Outlet Temperature, °F
Final Outlet Temperature, °F
Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature (tm), °F
Time, seconds
Orifice Meter Delta-H, inches w.c.
Barometric Pressure, in. Hg
Critical Orifice Inlet (Ambient) Temperature, °F:
Initial Ambient Temperature, °F
Final Ambient Temperature, °F
Avg. Critical Orifice Inlet Temperature (tamb), °F
Pump Vacuum, in. Hg
COMPUTED CALIBRATION RESULTS
Critical Orifice Gas Volume (Vcr (std)), std. ft.3
Dry Gas Meter Gas Volume (Vm (std)), std. ft.3
Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor (Y)
Orifice Meter Delta-H@
AVERAGE CALIBRATION RESULTS
Average Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor (Y)
Average Orifice Meter Delta-H@
CALIBRATION RESULTS COMPARISON
Criterion: Y Must Be Within 2% Of Average Y
Percent Difference Of Y From Average Y
Tolerance Result
COMPARISON WITH PRETEST RESULTS
Criterion: Y Must Be Within 5% Of Previous Y
% Difference Of Average Y From Previous Y
Tolerance Result
Y = 1 003696741625703
Run 1
395.801
399.981
47180
73.0
73.0
71.0
71.0
72.0
600
0.530
29.08 ~
72.8
71.8
72.3
18
• 4.045
4.037 ~
1.002
1.762
1.004
1.762
0.19%
PASS
3.30%
PASS
Run 2
399!'981
404.153
4.172
73.0
74.0
71.0
72.0
72.5
600
0.530
29.08
73.6
73.2
73.4
18
4.041
4.026
1.004
1.764
0.00%
PASS
Run3
404.153
408.329
4.176
74.0
75.0
72.0 1
73.0 1
73.5
600
0.530
29.08
!
72.6
72.0
72.3
18 I
j
4.045
4.022
1.006 \
1.758
I
0.19%
PASS
Remarks:
CRORCALB.WK4 10/24/96 (rev. 4951 POST.WK4 03/04/99 04:07 PM)
-------
CONSOLE CALIBRATION WORKSHEET
Job No. 4951-03-04-01 Console No. N5
Date 3-4-99 Orifice No. D12
Performed By D. Neal K Factor 0.3208
Barometer 29 .08 in. Hg. Previous Y 1.038
NOTE; Prior to running calibration, connect mercury manometer
to sample orifice. Turn on pump and bring mercury manometer up
to 18.0 in. Hg. Record mercury manometer and console vacuum
gauge readings below. Insert critical orifice into console
sample orifice. Set console vacuum gauge at 18.0 in. Hg. +/-
the console vacuum gauge correction factor calculated below.
Mercury manometer readings: 9.1 + 8.9
Console vacuum gauge reading:
A
Console vacuum gauge correction factor:
RUN #1 RUN #2 RUN #3
DGM Initial Volume:
Initial: 395.801 399.981 404.153
Final: 399.981 404 .153 408 .329
DGM Inlet Temperature:
Initial: 73 73 74
Final: 73 74 75
DGM Outlet Temperature:
Initial: 71 71 72
Final: 71 72 73
Time of run ( In Seconds ): 600 600 600
Orifice Delta H (in. H20): 0.53 0.53 0.53
Room Temperature:
Initial: 72.8 73.6 72.6
Final: 71.8 73.2 72.0
Pump Vacuum (in. Hg): 18.0 18.0 18.0
Calibration RccordsNCalibration Fornis\concalws4d.doc Revised 02/03/99
-------
M5 CONSOLE POST TEST CHECKLIST
Job No.
4951-03-04-01
Date
3-4-99
Console No.
N5
Performed By
D. Neal
Place a check (in black ink) in the space provided after the
required checks are performed.
_X Perform positive leak check of Delta H manometer.
(See back of this sheet.)
2
3
4
5
X
Leak check Delta P manometer.
N/A Clean pump.
X Clean muffler jar(s) .
X Inspect/refill oiler jar.
6.
X Calibrate DGM thermocouples:
(Note:
Within
Reading must be
+/-2.5°F)
DGM Inlet:
DGM Outlet:
Reference
Pyrometer
°F
69.2
69.2
Console
Pyrometer
69
69
7.
X
Digital clock/timer in place and functional.
X Vacuum check. (Leak check at 25 in. Hg. vacuum. Leak
rate should be zero.)
Check indicator lights.
Check thermocouple switched.
Check fan.
Check pump heater.
Check heat controllers.
Check Orsat pump and rotameter.
If any of the above items were replaced or repaired, please
document that information below:
9 .
10 .
11.
12.
13 .
14 .
X
X
X
X
X
X
Calibration Records\Calibra»ion Forms\M5check.doc
Revised 10/28/98
-------
METHOD 5 METERING CONSOLE CALIBRATION WITH CRITICAL ORIFICE
MRI Project No.
Date:
Operator:
4951-03-04-01
3-5-99
D. Neal
Metering Console No.
Previous Dry Gas Meter Factor (Y):
Calibrated Critical Orifice No.
Critical Orifice Coefficient in English Units (K1):
|_ Ambient Temperature Meter No.
N5
1.038
D19
0.51210
Y-0815
CALIBRATION GAS VOLUME DATA
Initial Dry Gas Meter Gas Volume, ft.3
Final Dry Gas Meter Gas Volume, ft.3
Net Dry Gas Meter Gas Volume (Vm), ft.3
CALIBRATION CONDITIONS DATA
Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F:
Initial Inlet Temperature, °F
Final Inlet Temperature, °F
Initial Outlet Temperature, °F
! Final Outlet Temperature, °F
! Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature (tm), °F
Time, seconds
Orifice Meter Delta-H, inches w.c.
Barometric Pressure, in. Hg
Critical Orifice Inlet (Ambient) Temperature, °F:
Initial Ambient Temperature, °F
Final Ambient Temperature, °F
Avg. Critical Orifice Inlet Temperature (tamb), °F
Pump Vacuum, in. Hg
COMPUTED CALIBRATION RESULTS
Critical Orifice Gas Volume (Vcr (std)), std. ft.3
i Dry Gas Meter Gas Volume (Vm (std)), std. ft.3
; Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor (Y)
Orifice Meter Delta-H@
AVERAGE CALIBRATION RESULTS
Average Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor (Y)
Average Orifice Meter Delta-H@
CALIBRATION RESULTS COMPARISON
Criterion: Y Must Be Within 2% Of Average Y
Percent Difference Of Y From Average Y
Tolerance Result
COMPARISON WITH PRETEST RESULTS
Criterion- Y Must Be Within 5% Of Previous Y
% Difference Of Average Y From Previous Y
Tolerance Result
Run 1
433.603
440.291
6.688
71.0
72.0
67.0
67.0
69.3
600
1.500
28.99
68.8
68.6
68.7
18
6.459
6.489
0.995
1.970
0.995
1.969
0.05%
PASS
4.16%
PASS
Run 2
440.291
446.998
""6707
72.0
73.0
68.0
68.0
70.3
600
1.500
28.99
69.2
69.8
69.5
18
6.454
6.495
0.994
1.969
Run3
.N v «
446.998
" 453.702
6.704
73.0
74.0
69.0
69.0
71.3
600
1.500
28.99
70.2
69.4
69.8
18
6.452
6.480
0.996
1.967
0.13%
PASS
"b.08%
PASS
Y= 0994829489910738 ]
Remarks:
CRORCALB.WK4 10/24/96 (rev. 4951 POS2.WK4 03/22/99 10:53 AM)
-------
CONSOLE CALIBRATION WORKSHEET
Job No. 4951-03-04-01 Console No. N5
Date 3-5-99 Orifice No. D19
Performed By __ D. Neal _ K Factor _ 0.5121
Barometer _ 28 .99 _ in. Hg. Previous Y _ ,1^-0-04- /,£.?
-------
METHOD 5 METERING CONSOLE CALIBRATION WITH CRITICAL ORIFICE
MRI Project No.
Date:
Operator:
4951-03-04-01
___02/04/99_
D. Neal
Metering Console No.
Previous Dry Gas Meter Factor (Y):
Calibrated Critical Orifice No.
[I Critical Orifice Coefficient in English Units («'):
CALIBRATION GAS VOLUME DATA
Initial Dry Gas Meter Gas Volume, ft.3
Final Dry Gas Meter Gas Volume, ft.3
Net Dry Gas Meter Gas Volume (Vm), ft.3
CALIBRATION CONDITIONS DATA
Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F:
Initial Inlet Temperature, °F
Final Inlet Temperature, °F
Initial Outlet Temperature, °F
Final Outlet Temperature, °F
Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature (tm), °F
Time, seconds
Orifice Meter Delta-H, inches w.c.
Barometric Pressure, in. Hg
Critical Orifice Inlet (Ambient) Temperature, °F:
Initial Ambient Temperature, °F
Final Ambient Temperature, °F
Avg. Critical Orifice Inlet Temperature (tamb), °F
Pump Vacuum, in. Hg
COMPUTED CALIBRATION RESULTS
Critical Orifice Gas Volume (Vcr (std)), std. ft.3
Dry Gas Meter Gas Volume (Vm (std)), std. ft.3
Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor (Y)
Orifice Meter Delta-H@
Ambient Temperature Meter No.
Run 1
' 737201 ""'
742.785
5.584
76.0
"77.0"
~73.0""~
73.0
74.8"
600
"1.200"
29.44
Run 2
742.785
748.365
5.580
77.0
78.0 ""
" "74.0
74.0
75.8
600
" T.200
29'.44"
77.4 78.2
""78.8 " " " "80.6
" " 78.1 " " "~79.4
18 " """ I '18
5.638 5.631
5.441" " ! "5.427
1.036 1.038
2.075" " 2.077
N5 ,
1.015
D16
0.44410
Y-0815
Run3 !
748.365 |
753.940 !
5.575
78.0
"""79.0 '
75.0 i
75.0
"" 76.8 " ;
600
" 1 200"
" "29.44 "
80.6
81.0
80.8
"18
5.624 •
5.412
1 .039 "
2.078
AVERAGE CALIBRATION RESULTS
Average Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor (Y) 1.038 I
Average Orifice Meter Delta-H@ 2.077 '
CALIBRATION RESULTS COMPARISON
Criterion. Y Must Be Within 2% Of Average Y
Percent Difference Of Y From Average Y
Tolerance Result
COMPARISON WITH PRETEST RESULTS
Criterion: Y Must Be Within 5% Of Previous Y
% Difference Of Average Y From Previous Y
Tolerance Result
0.14%
PASS
2.23%
PASS
0.00%
PASS
0.14%
PASS '
Y= 1037641445042041
Remarks:
CRORCALB.WK4 10/24/96 (rev. 4951 WK4 02/04/99 10'18AM)
-------
METHOD 5 METERING CONSOLE CALIBRATION WITH CRITICAL ORIFICE
MRI Project No.
Date:
Operator:
4951-03-04-01
3-5-99
D. Neal
Metering Console No.
Previous Dry Gas Meter Factor (Y):
Calibrated Critical Orifice No.
Critical Orifice Coefficient in English Units (K1):
Ambient Temperature Meter No.
N6
0.985
D12
0.32080
Y-0815
CALIBRATION GAS VOLUME DATA
Initial Dry Gas Meter Gas Volume, ft.3
Final Dry Gas Meter Gas Volume, ft.3
Net Dry Gas Meter Gas Volume (Vm), ft.3
CALIBRATION CONDITIONS DATA
Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F:
Initial Inlet Temperature, °F
Final Inlet Temperature, °F
Initial Outlet Temperature, °F
Final Outlet Temperature, °F
Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature (tm), °F
Time, seconds
Orifice Meter Delta-H, inches w.c.
! Barometric Pressure, in. Hg
Critical Orifice Inlet (Ambient) Temperature, °F:
Initial Ambient Temperature, °F
Final Ambient Temperature, °F
Avg. Critical Orifice Inlet Temperature (tamb), °F
Pump Vacuum, in. Hg
COMPUTED CALIBRATION RESULTS
Critical Orifice Gas Volume (Vcr (std)), std. ft.3
Dry Gas Meter Gas Volume (Vm (std)), std. ft.3
Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor (Y)
Orifice Meter Delta-H@
AVERAGE CALIBRATION RESULTS
Average Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor (Y)
Average Orifice Meter Delta-H@
CALIBRATION RESULTS COMPARISON
Criterion. Y Must Be Within 2% Of Average Y
Percent Difference Of Y From Average Y
Tolerance Result
COMPARISON WITH PRETEST RESULTS
Criterion: Y Must Be Within 5% Of Previous Y
% Difference Of Average Y From Previous Y
Tolerance Result
Y= 0998277495031353
Run 1
808.900
813.090
4.190
70.0
71.0
68.0
"69.0
69.5
"600
0.550
"~29.58
72.0
73.4
"72.7
18
4.113
4.136
0!994
1.808
0.998
1.809
0.40%
PASS
1 .35%
PASS
Run 2
' _ ,* ,
813.090
817.257
- 4.167
72.0
72.0
69.0
70.0
70.8
600
0.550
29.58
73.6
74.0
73.8
18
4.108
4.104
1.001
1.808
0.29%
PASS
Run 3
817.257
821.430
4.173
73.0
73.0
70.0
71.0
71.8
600
0.550
29.58
75.4
77.0
76.2
18
4.099
4.102
0.999
1.812
~0.11%
PASS
Remarks:
CRORCALB.WK4 10/24/96 (rev. 4951 POST.WK4 03/05/99 04:07 PM)
-------
CONSOLE CALIBRATION WORKSHEET
Job No. 4951-03-04-01 Console No. N6
Date 3-5-99 Orifice No. D12
Performed By D. Neal K Factor 0.3208
Barometer 29.58 in. Hg. Previous Y 0.985
NOTE: Prior to running calibration, connect mercury manometer
to sample orifice. Turn on pump and bring mercury manometer up
to 18.0 in. Hg. Record mercury manometer and console vacuum
gauge readings below. Insert critical orifice into console
sample orifice. Set console vacuum gauge at 18.0 in. Hg. +/-
the console vacuum gauge correction factor calculated below.
Mercury manometer readings: 9.1 + 8.9 = 18.0 In. Hg.
Console vacuum gauge reading: 18 . 0 In. Hg.
Console vacuum gauge correction factor: 0.0 In. Hg.
RUN #1 RUN #2 RUN #3
DGM Initial Volume:
Initial: 808.900 813.090 817.257
Final: 813 .090 817.257 821.430
DGM Inlet Temperature:
Initial: 70 72 73
Final : 71 72 73
DGM Outlet Temperature:
Initial: 68 69 _ 70
Final: 69 70 71
Time of run ( In Seconds ) : 600 600 600
Orifice Delta H {in. H20) : 0.55 0.55 Q.55
Room Temperature:
Initial: 72.0 73.6 75.4
Final: 73.4 74.0 77.0
Pump Vacuum (in. Hg ): 18.0 18.0 18.0
Calibration Records\Calibration Forms\concalws4d.doc Revised 02/03/99
-------
M5 CONSOLE POST TEST CHECKLIST
Job No.
4951-03-04-01
Date
3-5-99
Console No.
N6
Performed By
D. Neal
Place a check (in black ink) in the space provided after the
required checks are performed.
_X Perform positive leak check of Delta H manometer.
(See back of this sheet.)
2
3
4
5
X
Leak check Delta P manometer.
N/A Clean pump.
Clean muffler jar(s).
Inspect/refill oiler jar.
X
6. X Calibrate DGM thermocouples:
(Note : Reading must be
Within +/-2.5°F)
DGM Inlet:
DGM Outlet :
Reference
Pyrometer
oF
69.2
69.2
Console
Pyrometer
°F
68
68
7 .
X
Digital clock/timer in place and functional.
9.
10
11
12
13
14
_X Vacuum check. (Leak check at 25 in. Hg. vacuum. Leak
rate should be zero.)
_X Check indicator lights.
_X Check thermocouple switched.
X Check fan.
_X Check pump heater.
X Check heat controllers.
X Check Orsat pump and rotameter.
If any of the above items were replaced or repaired, please
document that information below:
Calibration Rccords\Calibration Forms\M5chcck.doc
Revised 10/28/98
-------
METHOD 5 METERING CONSOLE CALIBRATION WITH CRITICAL ORIFICE
MRI Project No.
Date:
Operator:
4951-03-04-01
02/04/99
D. Neal
Critical C
Metering Console No.
Previous Dry Gas Meter Factor (Y):
Calibrated Critical Orifice No.
Drifice Coefficient in English Units (K1):
Ambient Temperature Meter No.
N6 i
1.001 |
D16 :
0.44410 i
Y-0815 i
CALIBRATION GAS VOLUME DATA
Initial Dry Gas Meter Gas Volume, ft.3
Final Dry Gas Meter Gas Volume, ft.3
Net Dry Gas Meter Gas Volume (Vm), ft.3
CALIBRATION CONDITIONS DATA
Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F:
Initial Inlet Temperature, °F
Final Inlet Temperature, °F
Initial Outlet Temperature, °F
Final Outlet Temperature, °F
Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature (tm), °F
Time, seconds
Orifice Meter Delta-H, inches w.c.
Barometric Pressure, in Hg
Critical Orifice Inlet (Ambient) Temperature, °F:
Initial Ambient Temperature, °F
Final Ambient Temperature, °F
i Avg. Critical Orifice Inlet Temperature (tamb), °F
Pump Vacuum, in. Hg
COMPUTED CALIBRATION RESULTS
Critical Orifice Gas Volume (Vcr (std)), std. ft.3
Dry Gas Meter Gas Volume (Vm (std)), std. ft.3
Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor (Y)
Orifice Meter Delta-H@
I AVERAGE CALIBRATION RESULTS
Average Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor (Y)
Average Orifice Meter De!ta-H@
CALIBRATION RESULTS COMPARISON
Criterion. Y Must Be Within 2% Of Average Y
J Percent Difference Of Y From Average Y
Tolerance Result
COMPARISON WITH PRETEST RESULTS
: Criterion: Y Must Be Within 5% Of Previous Y
\ % Difference Of Average Y From Previous Y
|_ Tolerance Result
Run 1
304.801
310.713
5.912
79.0
80.0
76.0
"77.0
"78.0""
"" 600
T20"0
"" ""29.44""
79.6
"79.0"
79.3
18
5.632
" "5.726
""" 0.984
2.067
0.985
2.068
0.16%
PASS
1 .59%
"PASS
Run 2
310.713
316.616
5.903
80.0
80.0
77.0
"77.0
78.5
600
1.200
29.44
758
79.8
77.8
18 "
5.640
5.712
0.987
""2.060"
0.23%
"PASS
Run3
316.616
322.513
5.897
80.0 !
80.0
77.0
77.0"
78.5
600"
1.200
29.44 "" \
81.6
82.6
82.1
18
5.617
5706"
0.984 "
"""2.076 "" ;
I
* ™" !
0.07%
PASS
Y =
0985100226186568
Remarks:
CRORCALB.WK4 10/24/96 (rev. 4951 PRE.WK4 02/04/99 03'01 PM)
-------
METHOD 5 METERING CONSOLE CALIBRATION
CRITICAL ORIFICE BRACKETING DATA
MRI Project No.
Date:
Operator:
Metering Console No.
Dry Gas Meter Factor (Y):
Orifice Used for the Calibration:
Ambient Temperature Meter No.
4951-03-04-01
3-5-99
D. Neal
N5
0.995
D19
Y-0815
Note: Critical orifice coefficients are in English units.
Critical Orifice Being Evaluated
Critical Orifice No.
D19
Critical Orifices Used For Bracketing
First Orifice
Critical Orifice No.
Coefficient (K1):
Second Orifice
Critical Orifice No.
Coefficient (K1):
D16
0.44410
024
0.65490
CALIBRATION GAS VOLUME DATA
Initial Dry Gas Meter Gas Volume, ft.3
Final Dry Gas Meter Gas Volume, ft.3
Net Dry Gas Meter Gas Volume (Vm), ft.3
CALIBRATION CONDITIONS DATA
Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F:
Initial Inlet Temperature, °F
Final Inlet Temperature, °F
Initial Outlet Temperature, °F
Final Outlet Temperature, °F
Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature (tm), °F
Time, seconds
Orifice Meter Delta-H, inches w.c.
Barometric Pressure, in. Hg
Critical Orifice Inlet (Ambient) Temperature, °F:
Initial Ambient Temperature, °F
Final Ambient Temperature, °F
i Average Critical Orifice Inlet Temperature (tamb), °F
Pump Vacuum, in. Hg
COMPUTED CALIBRATION RESULTS
Critical Orifice Gas Volume (Vcr (std)), std. ft.3
Dry Gas Meter Gas Volume (Vm (std)), std. ft.3
Factor (Y) Obtained With Bracketing Orifice
CRITICAL ORIFICE ACCEPTABILITY
Criterion: All Ys Must Be Within 2% Of All Other Ys
Larger % Difference Between Dry Gas Meter Factor (Y)
And Factor (Y) Obtained With The Bracketing Orifice
Larger % Difference Between Factors (Ys)
Obtained With Bracketing Orifices
Acceptability Result
First Orifice
466.702
472.446
"""5.744"
74.0
74.0
71.0
71.0
72.5
600
1.100
28.99
70.2
69.6
69.9
18
5.595
" 5.534
1.011
1.61%
0.64%
All Orifices A
Second Orifice
472.602
481.101
8.499
74.0
75.0
71.0
71.0
72.8
600
2.350
28.99
71.0
69.4
70.2
18
8.248
8.210
1 .005
0.97%
re Acceptable
Remarks:
CRORBRKT.WK4 10/24/96 (rev. 4951 BRKT.WK4 03/05/99 10:01 AM)
-------
CONSOLE BRACKETING WORKSHEET
Job No. 4951-03-04-01 Console No. N5
Date 3-5-99 Bracketing Orifice No . 1 D16
Performed By D. Neal K Factor 0.4441
Calibration Orifice No. D19 Bracketing Orifice No.2 D24
New Y Factor 0.995 K Factor p.6549
Barometer 28.99 in. Hg.
NOTE; Prior to running calibration, connect mercury manometer
to sample orifice. Turn on pump and bring mercury manometer up
to 18.0 in. Hg. Record mercury manometer and console vacuum
gauge readings below. Insert critical orifice into console
sample orifice. Set console vacuum gauge at 18.0 in. Hg. +/-
the console vacuum gauge correction factor calculated below.
Mercury manometer readings: 9.1 + 8.9 = 18.0 in. Hg.
Console vacuum gauge reading: - 18.0 in. Hg.
Console vacuum gauge correction factor: 0.0 in. Hg.
RUN #1 RUN #2
DGM Initial Volume:
Initial: 466.702 472.602
Final: 472.446 481.101
DGM Inlet Temperature:
Initial: 74 74
Final: 74 75
DGM Outlet Temperature:
Initial: 71 71
Final: 71 71
Time of run ( In Seconds ): 600 600
Orifice Delta H(in. H20) : l.l 2.35
Room Temperature:
Initial: 70.2 71.0
Final: 69.6 69.4
Pump Vacuum (in. Hg ): 18.0 18.0
Calibration RccordsVCalibration Forms\conbrkws4d.doc Revised 02/03/99
-------
METHOD 5 METERING CONSOLE CALIBRATION
CRITICAL ORIFICE BRACKETING DATA
MRI Project No.
Date:
Operator:
Metering Console No.
Dry Gas Meter Factor (Y):
Orifice Used for the Calibration:
Ambient Temperature Meter No.
4951-03-04-01
3-5-99
D. Neal
N5
1 .004
D12
Y-0815
Note' Critical orifice coefficients are in English units
Critical Orifice Being Evaluated
Critical Orifice No.
D12
Critical Orifices Used For Bracketing
First Orifice
Critical Orifice No.
Coefficient (K1):
Second Orifice
Critical Orifice No.
Coefficient (K1):^
016
0.44410
D24
0.65490
CALIBRATION GAS VOLUME DATA
Initial Dry Gas Meter Gas Volume, ft.3
Final Dry Gas Meter Gas Volume, ft.3
Net Dry Gas Meter Gas Volume (Vm), ft.3
CALIBRATION CONDITIONS DATA
Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F:
Initial Inlet Temperature, °F
Final Inlet Temperature, °F
Initial Outlet Temperature, °F
Final Outlet Temperature, °F
Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature (tm), °F
Time, seconds
Orifice Meter Delta-H, inches w.c.
Barometric Pressure, in. Hg
Critical Orifice Inlet (Ambient) Temperature, °F:
Initial Ambient Temperature, °F
Final Ambient Temperature, °F
Average Critical Orifice Inlet Temperature (tamb), °F
Pump Vacuum, in. Hg
COMPUTED CALIBRATION RESULTS
Critical Orifice Gas Volume (Vcr (std)), std. ft.3
Dry Gas Meter Gas Volume (Vm (std)), std. ft.3
Factor (Y) Obtained With Bracketing Orifice
CRITICAL ORIFICE ACCEPTABILITY
Criterion- All Ys Must Be Within 2% Of All Other Ys
Larger % Difference Between Dry Gas Meter Factor (Y)
And Factor (Y) Obtained With The Bracketing Orifice
Larger % Difference Between Factors (Ys)
Obtained With Bracketing Orifices
Acceptability Result
First Orifice
466.702
472.446
5.744
74.0
74.0
71.0
71.0
72.5
600
1.100
28.99
70.2
69.6
69.9
18
5.595
5.534
1.011
0.70%
0.64%
All Orifices A
Second Orifice
472.602
481.101
8.499
74.0
75.0
71.0
71.0
72.8
600
2.350
28.99
71.0
69.4
70.2
18
8.248
8.210
1.005
0.06%
re Acceptable
Remarks:
CRORBRKT.WK4 10/24/96 (rev. 4951 BRK2.WK4 03/22/99 11:15 AM)
-------
Job No
Date
Ambient Temp.(°F)
STACK THERMOCOUPLE CALIBRATION DATA FORM
4951-03-04-01 Stack Thermocouple No.
3-15-99 _ Probe No. 3-1
Barometer
36-11
69
29.23
in. Hg
Y-0815
Performed By Daniel Neal Pyrometer No.
Avg. Stack Temp.(°F) 163
Reference Instrument: Hart Scientific Model No. 9100A, Serial
No. 84414 Dry-well, HDRC Handheld Block A. This instrument
is calibrated in accordance with ITS-90 and ANSI/NCSL Z540-1.
Reference Instrument
Temp. ( °F )
69.2
100 .0
150.0
200.0
Pyrometer Temp.
(°F)
70.0
100.0
150.0
201.4
Temp. Difference
(°F)
-0 .8
0. 0
0. 0
-1.4
Temp. Difference
(%)
-0.15
0.0
0.0
-0.21
« "•
[ref. Temp., F + 460) - (pyro. Temp., F + 460;
(ref. Temp., F + 460!
X 100 < 1.5%
Calibration Kccords\CaIibration Forms\STCHart.doc
Revised 10/29/98
-------
STACK THERMOCOUPLE CALIBRATION DATA FORM
Job No. 4951-03-04-01
Date 3-15-99
Ambient Temp.(°F)
69
Stack Thermocouple No.
Probe No. 3-2
Barometer 29.23
36-13
in. Hg
Performed By Daniel Neal Pyrometer No.
Avg. Stack Temp.(°F) 161
Y-0815
Reference Instrument: Hart Scientific Model No. 9100A, Serial
No. 84414 Dry-well, HDRC Handheld Block A. This instrument
is calibrated in accordance with ITS-90 and ANSI/NCSL Z540-1.
Reference Instrument
Temp. ( "F )
69.2
100 . 0
150. 0
200.0
Pyrometer Temp.
(°F)
69.8
100.0
150.0
201.2
Temp. Difference
CF)
-0.6
0.0
0.0
-1.2
Temp. Difference
(%)
-0 . 11
0. 0
0. 0
-0 . 18
, _
!ref. Temp., F + 460) - (pyro. Temp., F + 460i
(ref. Temp., F + 460)
X 100 < 1.5:
Calibration RccordsXCalibration FormsVSTCUartdoc
Revised 10/29/98
-------
STACK THERMOCOUPLE CALIBRATION DATA FORM
Job No. 4951-03-04-01 Stack Thermocouple No. 36-10
Date 3-15-99 Probe No. 3-4
69 Barometer 29.23
Ambient Temp. ( F)
in. Hg
Y-0815
Performed By Daniel Neal Pyrometer No.
Avg. Stack Temp.(°F) 175
Reference Instrument: Hart Scientific Model No. 9100A, Serial
No. 84414 Dry-well, HDRC Handheld Block A. This instrument
is calibrated in accordance with ITS-90 and ANSI/NCSL Z540-1.
Reference Instrument
Temp. ( °F )
69.0
100.0
150.0
200 .0
Pyrometer Temp.
(°F)
70.0
100 .0
150 .2
200.8
Temp. Difference
(°F)
-1.0
0.0
-0.2
-0 .8
Temp. Difference
(%)
-0.19
0 . 0
-0.03
-0 .12
„
(ref. Temp., F + 460) - (pyro. Temp., F + 460)
[ref. Temp., F + 460!
X 100 < 1.5s
Calibration Rccords\Calibration Forms\STCHart.doc
Revised 10/29/98
-------
Job No.
Date
Ambient Temp.( F)
STACK THERMOCOUPLE CALIBRATION DATA FORM
4951-03-04-01 Stack Thermocouple No. 36-12
3-15-99 _ Probe No. 3-5
Barometer 29.23
69
in.Hg
Performed By Daniel Neal Pyrometer No.
Y-0815
Avg. Stack Temp.(°F)
69
Reference Instrument: Hart Scientific Model No. 9100A, Serial
No. 84414 Dry-well, HDRC Handheld Block A. This instrument
is calibrated in accordance with ITS-90 and ANSI/NCSL Z540-1.
Reference Instrument
Temp. ( "F )
69.0
100 . 0
150 . 0
200. 0
Pyrometer Temp.
(°F)
69. 6
100.0
150 .0
201.2
Temp. Difference
(°F)
-0.6
0.0
0.0
-1.2
Temp. Difference
(%)
-0.11
0. 0
0. 0
-0 . 18
* —
(ref. Temp., F + 460) - (pyro. Temp., F + 460)
[ref. Temp., F + 460;
X 100 < 1.5s
Calibration RccordsNCalibration Forms\STCHart.doc
Revised 10/29/98
-------
Job No.
Date
Ambient Temp.( F
STACK THERMOCOUPLE CALIBRATION DATA FORM
4951-03-04-01 Stack Thermocouple No.
3-15-99 _ Probe No. 4-2
Barometer
48-14
69
29.23
in. Hg
Y-0815
Performed By Daniel Neal Pyrometer No.
Avg. Stack Temp.(°F) 131
Reference Instrument: Hart Scientific Model No. 9100A, Serial
No. 84414 Dry-well, HDRC Handheld Block A. This instrument
is calibrated in accordance with ITS-90 and ANSI/NCSL Z540-1.
Reference Instrument
Temp. ( °F )
69.0
100.0
150.0
200 . 0
Pyrometer Temp.
(°F)
69.6
100. 0
150 .0
201. 0
Temp. Difference
CF)
-0 .6
0.0
0.0
-1 .0
•
Temp. Difference
(%)
-0 .11
0.0
0 .0
-0.15
* •
(ref. Temp., F + 460) - (pyro. Temp., F + 460]
Iref. Temp., F + 460)
X 100 < 1.5!
Calibration Rccords\Calibration Forms\STCHart.doc
Revised 10/29/98
-------
Job No.
Date
Ambient Temp.(°F)
STACK THERMOCOUPLE CALIBRATION DATA FORM
4951-03-04-01 Stack Thermocouple No.
3-15-99 Probe No.
Barometer
60-3
5-6
69
29.23
in.Hg
Y-0815
Performed By Daniel Neal Pyrometer No.
Avg. Stack Temp.(°F) 96
Reference Instrument: Hart Scientific Model No. 9100A, Serial
No. 84414 Dry-well, HDRC Handheld Block A. This instrument
is calibrated in accordance with ITS-90 and ANSI/NCSL Z540-1.
Reference Instrument
Temp. ( "F )
69.0
100.0
150,0
200.0
Pyrometer Temp.
(°F)
69.2
100.0
150 .2
201.4
Temp. Difference
(•F)
-0.2
0.0
-0.2
-1.4
Temp. Difference
(%)
-0.04
0.0
-0 . 03
-0.21
,
[ref. Temp., F + 460) - (pyro. Temp., F + 460]
(ref. Temp., F + 460]
X 100 < 1.5%
Calibration Rccords\CaIibration Forms\STCHart.doc
Revised 10/29/98
-------
Type S Pitot Tube Inspecrion Data Form
Pitot Tube #•
Probe #:
M-136 Date:
3-1 Job #:
Pitot tube assembly level?
Pitot tube openings damaged?
a, = 1 °
P. = 1
Y = 1
z = A sin Y
co = A sin 8
°, 8 =
0.013
0.026
2
3-16-99 Performed By: __
4951-03-04-01
X Yes
Yes (explain below)
c, = 0 °
A =
0.742
(in)
PA= 0.367
(in); (< 0.125 in)
(in); (< 0.03125 in)
(m), PB= 0.375 (in), DT =
Calibration required?
Comments:
Yes
X
No
Daniel Neal
025
No
X No
(in)
L f-^\ _-V--J
Ti A or B V^ J^ AT
( ^-^\
(1 A ^L IZ>^
048CM<:Dt<095CM
(3/16 in.) (3/8 in)
Transveree
Tube Axis
Transverse
Tube Axis
Calibration KccordsNCalibration Forms\ncwpitot.doc
01/18/99
-------
Type S Pitot Tube Inspection Data Form
Pitot Tube #
Probe #•
M-126 Date: 3-16-99 Performed By:
Job#: 4951-03-04-01
3-2
Pitot tube assembly level?
Pitot tube openings damaged?
a, = 1 ° (<10°),
_X Yes
Yes (explain below)
cc2 =
p, = 1 c
Y = 2 <
z = A sin Y
q) = A sin 6
', 9 =
0.026
0.026
2
A =
0.745
(in)
PA= 0.345
(in); (< 0.125 in)
(in); (< 0.03125 in)
(in), PB= 0.400 (in), DT =
Calibration required?
Comments:
Yes
X
No
Daniel Neal
0.25
No
X No
Longitudinal QJ Flow* ^
A TubeAxis —TT ^r;
Longitudinal
Tube Axis —»• —
0 48 CM < Dt < 0.95 CM
(3/16 in) (3/8 m)
Transverse
Tube Axis
1.05Dt
-------
Type S Pitot Tube Inspection Data Form
Pitot Tube #: M-103 Date: 3-16-99 Performed By:
Probe #: 3-4 Job #: 4951-03-04-01
Pitot tube assembly level?
Pitot tube openings damaged?
a, = 1 ° (<10°),
Pi = 1 ° (<5 °),
Y = 2 °, 9 = 3
z = A sin Y 0.026
Yes
X Yes (explain below)
0
A =
0.757 (in)
_ _ (in); (< 0. 125 in)
cp = A sin 0 _ 0.040 _ (in); (< 0.03 125 in)
PA = 0.381 (in), PB = 0.376 (in), DT =
Calibration required? _ Yes X No
Comments: Negative impact side of pitot bent partially out of round.
Daniel Neal
0.25
No
No
(in)
Longitudinal o
TubeAxis -> —f
0.48 CM < DI < 0.95 CM
(3/16 in.) (3/8 in.)
Transverse
Tube Axis
Transverse
Tube Axis
A Tube Axis n ^r
() AorB ~C J~ L_3C~I CT* \ V
Calibration Rccords\Calibration Forms\nevvpitot.doc
01/18/99
-------
Type S Pitot Tube Inspection Data Form
Pitot Tube #: M-101 Date: 3-16-99 Performed By:
Daniel Neal
Probe #: 3-5 Job #: 4951-03-04-01
Pitot tube assembly level? X Yes
Pitot tube openings damaged? Yes (explain below)
a, = 1 (<10°), «2 = 2 ° (<10°)
0i = 1 ° (<5°), P2 = 1 (<5°)
Y = 4 °, 8 = 1 °, A = 0.750 (in)
z = AsmY 0-052 (in); (< 0.125 in)
Q>=Asine 0.013 (in); (< 0.03 125 in)
PA- 0.375 (in), PB = 0.375 (in), DT =
No
X No
0.25 (in)
Calibration required? Yes X No
Comments:
Longitudinal O B
A Tube Axis
' ' A
Longitudinal
Tube Axis —*• —
0.48 CM < Dt < 0.95 CM
(3/16 in) (3/8 in)
Note.
10SDilanes
Transverse
Tube Axis
__ (
lLA -
Calibration Rccords\CaIihration FormsVnc\vpitot.doc
01/18/99
-------
Type S Pitot Tube Inspection Data Form
Pitot Tube #: M-106 Date: 3-16-99 Performed By:
Daniel Neal
Probe #: 4-2 Job #: 4951-03-04-01
Pitot tube assembly level? X Yes
Pitot tube openings damaged? Yes (explain below)
a, = 1 (<10°), a2 = 0 (<10°)
Pi = 1 ° (<5°X P2 = 1 ° (<5°)
Y = 1 °, 6 = 2 °, A = 0750 (in)
z = AsinY 0-013 (in); (< 0.125 in)
cp = A sinO ' 0.026 (in); (< 0.03125 in)
PA= 0.370 (in), PB = 0.380 (in), DT =
No
X No
0.25 (in)
Calibration required? Yes X No
Comments:
Longitudinal
V
(32
( f "**\
(LA V- ^2>^
Calibration Rccords\Calibration Forms\ncwpitot.doc
01/18/99
-------
Tvoe S Pitot Tube Inspection Data Form
Pitot Tube #. M-115 Date: 3-16-99 Performed By:
Probe #: 5-6 Job #: 4951-03-04-01
Pitot tube assembly level?
Pitot tube openings damaged?
a, = 1 ° (<10°),
X Yes
Yes (explain below)
1 ° (<10°)
a2 =
0.0
Q °, 0 = 0 °, A = 0.757 (in)
(in); (< 0. 125 in)
(in); (< 0.03 125 in)
0.382 (in), DT =
z = A sin y
co = A sin 8 _
PA = Q.375 (in), PB =
0.0
Calibration required?
Comments:
Yes X No
Daniel Neal
0.25
No
X No
(in)
Longitudinal
A Tube Axis —
Longitudinal
Tube Axis —>• —
0 48 CM < Di < 0.95 CM
(3/16 in.) (3/8 m)
Note.
r-j—i~r —
.±_i__ f 105Dt_ \ * = *»
B- Side Plane
Transverse
Tube Axis
( f--^\
Q AorB ^^ ^)
Face i
iing*i
IBS
Transverse
Tube Axis
Calibration RecordsVCalibration Forms\ncnpitot.doc
01/18/99
-------
SAMPLE BOX FILTER THERMOCOUPLE CALIBRATION DATA FORM
Job No. 4951-03-04-01 Console Pyrometer No. N6
Date 3-15-99 Reference Pyrometer No. Y-0815
Ambient Temp. (°F) 69 Reference TC No. T-23
Performed By D. Neal Barometer 29 . 23 in. Hg
Calibration Method: Heat sample box to 250° F with M5 Console.
Then, check filter box temperature by comparing M5 console
temperature meter against calibrated pyrometer and
thermocouple.
Sample Box
No.
10
10285
12001
12003
Reference Pyrometer
Temp. ( °F )
243 .4
239.8
248.2
244.4
Console Pyrometer
Temp. ( "F )
242
243
249
245
> Temperature Difference
\Tlfaa& +1- 5.4 °F)
1.4
-3 .2
-0 . 8
-0.6
-
Calibration Rccords\Calibration Forms\Sbtccal.doc
Revised 10/29/98
-------
XAD THERMOCOUPLE CALIBRATION DATA FORM
Job No. 4951-03-04-01
Date 3-5-99
Pyrometer No.
Y-0815
Ambient Temp.(°F)
Performed By
66
D. Neal
Reference Thermometer ASTM 63F
Serial Number 1979299
Barometer 28 . 99 in. Hg
Calibration Method: Water bath with ASTM thermometer @ ambient
and ice temperatures.
XAD Thermocouple
Number
4
91-11
Reference Thermometer
Temp. ( "F )
64 .4
64 .4
Pyrometer Temperature
(°F)
64 .8
64.8
f Temperature Difference
fro\v.{a*L
-------
GOOSENECK THERMOCOUPLE CALIBRATION DATA FORM
Job No. 4951-03-04-01
Pyrometer No.
Y-0815
Date 3-5-99
Ambient Temp.(°F)
Performed By
66
D. Neal
Reference Thermometer ASTM 63F
Serial Number 1979299
Barometer
28.99
in. Hg
Calibration Method: Ambient water bath with ASTM thermometer.
Goose-neck
T.C. No.
UH-12
UH-32
UH-34
UH-37
Leak Check & Check
Valve Pass/No-pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Ref. Thermometer
Temperature ( "F )
64 .4
64 .4
64 .4
64 .4
Pyrometer Temp.
(°F)
64 .6
64 .6
64.6
64 .8
f Temp. Difference
,Tolr.v.«F+/-2°F)
+ 0.2
+ 0.2
+ 0.2
+ 0.4
-
Calibration Rccords\Calibration Forms\Gntccal.doc
Revised 10/28/98
-------
ANEROID BAROMETER CALIBRATION CHECK
Location: Kansas City, Missouri
Altitude Above Sea Level: 850 feet
Latitude: 39° 05.8' north
Meteorological Gravity: 32.1551 feet/second2
Mercury Barometer Description: Sargent Welch, Cat. S-4519, Lot 791802000
MRI Project No. 4951-04-03-01
Date: 2/18/99
Time: 11.38
Readings Obtained By: D. Neal w .
Observed Barometer Reading: 29.07 in. Hg
Mercury Column Temperature: 68 °F
Correction For Temperature: -0.10 in. Hg
Correction For Gravity: -0.02 in. Hg
Corrected Barometric Pressure: 28.95 in. Hg
Aneroid Barometer I.D. No.: X-4029
Reading Before Adjustment: 28.94 in. Hg
Calibration Check Result: within 0.1 in. Hg
r a qf
Reading After Adjustment: f°> *> in. Hg
Remarks:
BAROMETR.WK4 10/19/98 (rev. BAROMETR.WK^ 02/18/99 11:38 AM)
-------
ANEROID BAROMETER CALIBRATION CHECK
Location: Kansas City, Missouri
Altitude Above Sea Level: 850 feet
Latitude: 39° 05.8' north
Meteorological Gravity: 32.1551 feet/second2
Mercury Barometer Description: Sargent Welch, Cat. S-4519, Lot 791802000
MRI Project No. 4951-03-04-01
Date: 02/04/99
Time: 0903 /,
/'/ /
Readings Obtained By: D. Neal / / ' / '
Observed Barometer Reading: 29.57 in. Hg
Mercury Column Temperature: 73 °F
Correction For Temperature: -0.11 in. Hg
Correction For Gravity: -0.02 in. Hg
Corrected Barometric Pressure: 29.44 in. Hg
Aneroid Barometer I.D. No.: X-4029
Reading Before Adjustment: 29.44 in. Hg
Calibration Check Result: within 0.1 in. Hg
Reading After Adjustment: /^ /' I in. Hg
Remarks:
BAROMETR.WK4 10/19/98 (rev. BAROMETR.WK4 02/04/99 10:24 AM)
-------
SAMPLING NOZZLE CALIBRATION CHECK DATA
MRI Project No. 4951.03.04.01
Client/Source: U.S. EPA OAQPS EMAD SCG / Chip Dryer and Reverberatory Furnace #1
Source Location: Steele, Alabama
Sampling Location: All locations
Nozzle I.D. Number or
Dedicated Sampling
Train Number
Nozzl.. Type
(Shape and Material
of Construction)
Three Measured Diameters, inches
D1 D2 D3
Average
Diameter,
inches
6./9J
0,231
Measured By
Date
COMMENTS:
NOZZLCAX WPD April 29. 1996 (tev NOZZLCA WPO Janua.y 28, 19991
-------
Appendix D
Semivolatile Analysis Narrative Report
MRI-AED\RJ951-03-04-01 »p
-------
Analysis Narrative
4951-03-04-02
Semivolatiles
Analysis was conducted according to the Work Plan for this project. The Trio1-A GC/MS
was used for analysis. LabBase was used for acquisition and processing of the samples
Calibration curve. All analytes and surrogates had %RSD less than 15 with one exception.
2,4,6-Tribromophenol had a % RSD of 16.
Second Source Verification Standard. A second source verification standard was analyzed
after the initial calibration curve, but it had no IS solution in it. A reanalysis, after adding
internal standard solution, was conducted the following day with criteria being met. All
samples were analyzed after the passing second source standard was analyzed. The
method blank and LCS were analyzed before the passing second source standard. SEE
PAR.
Continuing Calibrations. CCALS were good for all analysis days.
DFTPP passed Method 8270C criteria using three scans each analysis day.
All internal standards met criteria of 50 - 200% recovery of the daily standard except for
sample 2011 /2012/2013. d12-Perylene was low in all analyses of this sample: 1:5, 1:25
and 1:125 dilutions. As the dilution increased, the % of internal standard area from the
lowest acceptable area also increased: 10, 50, 91 respectively. A duplicate analysis was
performed on the 1:5 dilution with similar results as the first one. Matrix is the suspected
culprit for a low recovery. SEE PAR.
Surrogate recoveries were acceptable for all samples and QC samples per the QAPP except
for 2-fluorobiphenyl. This surrogate was high in sample 2011/2012/2013- 124%, 135%
for second analysis, upper limit is 115%. SEE PAR.
The analysis of the method blank indicated no contamination of targets.
One LCS sample was analyzed. Recoveries were acceptable per the QAPP.
Rachel Swaney 3/19/99
-------
TABLE 1. DATA SUMMARY FOR SEMIYOLATILE ORGANICS IN UG
Ran:
Saropted;;
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Anthracene
Benz(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
4-Bromophenyl-phenylether
1 -Chloronaphthalene
Chiysene
Dibenzofuran
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
Dibenzothiophene
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Hexachlorobenzene
Indeno( 1 ,2,3 -cd)pyrene
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
Chip Dryer Baghouse
Inlet
Ran 1
mm
ND1
11.4
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
16.3
ND
64.6
ND
8.64
12.2
ND
13.7
ND
687
49.5
ND
Ran 2
mm
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
39.6
ND
6.49
7.53
ND
ND
ND
180
28.5
ND
Chip Dryer BagJ»«Uie
OnUel
Run!
win
ND
9.61
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
10.3
ND
40.3
ND
ND
ND
12.0
ND
ND
471
34.1
ND
Run 2
wmfr
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
8.84
ND
24.5
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
275
23.6
ND
Funiui<5e BagbflQse
Inlet
Sun 1
mw§
ND
911
106
77.9
32.8
152
25.8
31.8
ND
ND
109
165
ND
27.8
316
142
ND
36.0
3199
776
255
BUB 2
M2/<$
ND
327
43.7
70.9
ND2
930 2
189 2
202 2
ND
29.0
207
279
95. 12
30.0
685
230
27.7
327 2
5148
1286
271
|?urpace BagKause :
O«fl'et ' " •••''•
Ruoi
mm?
10.5
414
28.0
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
8.17
ND
128
ND
27
193
80
26.6
ND
1934
543
35.0
Run 2
: SflfcMW \
ND
741
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
173
ND
ND
59.2
147
ND
ND
3671
596
ND
1 ND = Not detected, less than lowest calibration standard (5 ug)
Internal Standard outside acceptable range on original and dilution analyses.
-------
TABLE 2. INDIVIDUAL LABORATORY SURROGATE RECOVERIES
FOR SEMIVOLATILES
..-•;••• »«BJ
: Sampled;
2-Fluorophenol
Phenol-d5
2-Chlorophenol-d4
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4
Nitrobenzene-d5
2-Fluorobiphenyl
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
Terphenyl-dl4
Chip Dryer Baghffitse
Inlet :-
R«« t
2M>9:
75.3
90.4
83.7
72.8
77.3
87.8
97.3
88.0
JRtt»2 :
:: 2/9/99:
78.1
98.5
87.5
75.6
73.9
92.7
107
94.2
Chip Dryer 8ag&o«se
: Outlet .
Bti'ti.i
2/9/99
74.9
89.7
88.9
77.8
108
93.9
81.7
90.1
RU&2
2/9/99
79.1
81.4
88.5
72.1
99.2
91.2
90.7
92.5
; Fnrnace Baghouse
'•••"•' Met '-.?•': ;.
•I'RUMfl:^
:2/lI/99
71.1
81.7
96.6
85.7
91.2
106
103
103
jRftttZ
, Mi/99
65.1
80.0
93.1
85.8
118
124
117
126
Furnace Baghouse
Outlet:
Html
2/11/99
69.8
62.2
59.6
70.4
119
89.7
114
87.6
RttB 2
2/12/99
72.6
80.8
91.2
82.0
108
103
93.3
109
;Bfdtifc:
Train
HA
NA
68.5
80.4
75.7
71.2
81.6
82.9
111
90.1
/Mfethed
Blank
JRA
NA
69.1
76.7
75.6
72.8
76.3
83.2
104
87.4
LCS
NA ..
NA
64.4
76.2
72.0
69.2
73.3
81.8
103
95.2
1 Recovery is outside of the DQO for PAH surrogates.
2 NA = Not applicable.
-------
TABLE 3. INDIVIDUAL FIELD SURROGATE RECOVERIES
FOR SEMIVOLATILES
Sample No.
1001-1003
1006-1008
2001-2003
2006-2008
1011-1013
1016-1018
2011-2013
2016-2018
t. '._.'..
y.;;:. Location :
Chip Dryer Baghouse Inlet
Chip Dryer Baghouse Outlet
Chip Dryer Baghouse Inlet
Chip Dryer Baghouse Outlet
Furnace Baghouse Inlet
Furnace Baghouse Outlet
Furnace Baghouse Inlet
Furnace Baghouse Outlet
Run
1
1
2
2
1
1
2
2
Date
Sampled
2/9/99
2/9/99
2/9/99
2/9/99
2/11/99
2/11/99
2/12/99
2/12/99
Sample average recovery
Sample standard deviation
1026-1028
MB
LCS
Blank Train
NA
NA
NA2
NA
NA
2/2/99
NA
NA
Field surf*
4*.
FJuoranttiene
87.4
97.2
49.4
93.8
96.9
128
97.2
101
94.0
22
95.2
82.5
91.5
igates,;%&:
&a«
BenzoFalnvrene
74.4
85.2
56.3
90.4
107
93.6
59.3
89.0
81.9
17
90.2
73.2
93.7
Footnotes: Only those numbers indicated in table are applicable.
Recovery is outside of the DQO for PAH surrogates
2 NA = Not applicable.
-------
TABLE 4. LABORATORY CONTROL SPIKE AND INDEPENDENT
CHECK SAMPLE RECOVERIES FOR SEMIVOLATILES
• .; • :- "..Aiialjfte";-:" • : •• ; •
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Anthracene
Benz(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
4-Bromophenyl-phenylether
1 -Chloronaphthalene
Chrysene
Dibenzofuran
3ibenz(a,h)anthracene
Dibenzothiophene
^luoranthene
"luorene
Hexachlorobenzene
Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
Naphthalene
3henanthrene
Pyrene
IA$ Spike
Toial us
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
LCS Result
Total 112
23.4
23.6
25.2
26.0
25.5
26.2
26.1
25.8
24.8
21.8
26.4
23.2
26.8
NS1
26.4
24.2
25.3
26.8
20.9
25.1
26.1
. iCS Recovery, •
=.-... %R-;*.- .
93.6
94.4
101
104
102
105
104
103
99.2
87.2
106
92.8
107
NA2
106
96.8
101
107
83.6
100
104
JCS 'Recovery:.. .
::i: j!VV#$"- >;••;:••.
103
101
105
99
102
103
104
110
102
104
101
100
104
NA
96
103
98
102
100
102
101
NS = Not spiked.
NA = Not applicable.
-------
TABLE 5. LABORATORY METHOD BLANK, AND BLANK TRAIN
RESULTS FOR SEMIVOLATILES
Analyte :
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Anthracene
Benz(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
4-Bromophenyl-phenylether
1 -Chloronaphthalene
Chrysene
Dibenzofuran
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
Dibenzothiophene
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Hexachlorobenzene
Indeno( 1 ,2,3 -cd)pyrene
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
Detection Limit 1
totaling
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
Method Blank : :ii
•" Total pig"! -1"!
ND2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
:!;jiBMok:Mfe:-,
•'•!! -"••• toiii ptjp; ..: .;::
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Footnotes Only those numbers indicated in table are applicable.
1 Detection limit is the lowest calibration standard.
ND = Not detected, less than the lowest calibration standard.
-------
Appendix E
Process Data
MRI-AED\R4951-03-04-01 wpd
-------
09.10.6
Customer;
Address:.
Dryer Report
Lot:
Start:
Finish: / '
Received:
/
/ 99
Rec. Tkt No.:.
Bin No.:
Analysis
High Grade
Mixed
2% Zinc
1) Chips
Curl
2) Cutting Fluid: Oil
3) Oxidized ? (Circle One)
4) Iron: None
>-
>
Description
Solids
Water Base
No
Light
Heavy
Other (Describe).
5) Other Contamination: Trash
Other (Describe)
Remarks
Floor Sweeps
Alloy.
Other
Heavy Oil
<7
Ni
Ti
Cu
Sn
Si
Mn
Fe
Cr
Pb
Zn
Mg
Results
Gross Weight.
Clean and Dry Weight.
Solids.
Recovery.
'/
Fines
Cyclone
Trash
/r
Lbs.
Lbs.
Lbs
Lbs.
Lbs.
>
>
Lbs.
Settle Weight
_Lbs.
Lbs.
Lbs.
-------
L°)\
L1\
\Ll
Qtlj
h
Ihh
Ihb
Lhh
Uh
}Lh
i
£
jr^-
; Ql
u/*
•^ (T(r'
i:
- oo:~co
- 55: 10
- 09: \fl
-oh'- tO
tlh ~
$t: lo
9>: lo
£>0h -
\iQ\-i
: oo
. a
-------
oi: __
02-; P 5T
01.[ 3$-
0 2-."f f
03
\l
1-7 S
I TZ-
Hi?
371
437
s
-------
Dryer Report
09.10.6
Customer:
Lot:
Start:
Address:.
Finish: ?,•/»•
Date Received:
>
.Lbs.
Lbs.
Lbs.
-------
^ ^ ^
JO X/ 5L.
c/
O Q, O
o
o
0
^ VH VAi V^4 c>i Oo (jkj ^ O) Ui U)
OO —*— — %>SL> V
. 0-f
(A i^
~ 0
o c>
U> 0
o Q' §
0 cr
u\ o
o
\
^
7?
~t
so
-£.
-C:
In
r
-------
C- O Q O ,<
^ \>i V ^ I'
C3
^
s'
r
-------
a *
-------
TIME & DflTE WEIGHT ID NO. SEQUENCE NO.
89 FEB 99 18:44 P« 205 LB BWTEST^ 1
89 FEB 99 18:52 PM 203 LB 8WTEST 2
89 FEB 99 11:81 PM 204 LB 0WTEST 3
09 FEB 99 11:10 PH 203 LB 000TEST 4
09 FEB 99 11:20 PM 206 LB 000TEST 5
09 FB 99 11:29 PM 203 LB 000TEST 6
09 FEB 99 11:38 PM 206 LB 000TEST 7
09 FEB 99 11:48 PM 204 LB 0WTEST 8
09 FEB 99 11:58 PM 204 LB 080TEST 9
18 FEB 99 12:88 AM 204 LB 000TEST 10
10 FEB 99 12:19 AM 205 LB 0MTEST 11
10 FEB 99 12:38 AM 203 LB 000TEST 12
10 FEB 99 12:41 AM 206 LB 000TEST 13
10 FB 99 12:51 AM 204 LB 000TEST 14
10 FEB 99 01:82 AM 201 LB 000TEST 15
10 FEB 99 01:14 AM- 2«3 LB 0WTEST Ib
18 FEB 99 01:25 AM 204 LB 000TEST 17
10 FEB 99 01:36 AM 204 LB 000TEST 18
18 FEB 99 01:46 AM 204 LB 000TEST 19
10 FEB 99 81:57 AM 203 LB 000TEST 20
10 FEB 99 02:09 AM 205 LB 0WTEST 21
TIME t DflTE TOTAL HEIGHT ID NO. TOTAL UEIGWENTS
10 FEB 99 82:11 AM 4284 LB 0WTEST 21
-------
I-* — { *-*• t-L t-* t— L
Q t-i Q SP Q Q
3
TI m TI "n -n -n
n m rn m rn
CO S» 03 W CO CO
H
© rn © © © ©
rp (T1 T1 CT1 CT1
CD
U
3
CD ©
©
D I" D D
3332
miTirnniTimrniTirnrnrnrniTirnrTirnrn
totococotocotocococococdcotocococni
up ip kp
©©©©©©
en en en en en en
-t- -t-
u
©
GJ
O
& m
en -t- c.i ro
CD CD or- .t-
© en
co ru
ru
en
ro
ro
x> r°
2 -i
T,i Xi I? ID ~L> X> IP TJ TJ I1 TJ 35 T> "U
23222222222322
a
H
-P- TJ
— r ro ru ru
* -vj S S" iS
en s: en -t> ro w
m
r " r r r r
CO UJ CO CO to CD
I
H
iS "S iS "S iS
iS M S> iS iS iS
S O S iS & ©
H H H H H
m z m m m m
en o en en en en
r>'i ru ru ro ro ru ru ru ru ro ru ru ru ru ro ru ru m
QiSiSiSQiSiSiSS'iSiSiSiiSi'SiSiiSiSi'-1
c.i co .£• *• j> r>i f C'l en -t- or' ro t-i en M c^i ro en
rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrn
QQQQQQ©QQQ©QS©Q©SO
HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmz
en en en en en en en en en en m en en en 01 en ir\ o
O
ro H ro ru
t-^- TJI 1-^ iS
r
s: '
m
en
i
2
m
CD
en
ru
CD
en
m
PP p- n
c
m
z
n
n
o
en
-------
TIME & DATE WEIGHT ID NO. SEQUENCE NO.
10FEB 99 04:10 AM 2 LB TEST 2 1
10 FEB 99 04:17 AM 205 LB TEST 2 2
10 FEB 99 04:28 AM 203 LB TEST 2 3
10 FEB 99 04:37 AM 203 LB TEST 2 4
10 FEB 99 04:46 flM 203 LB TEST 2 5
10 FEB 99 04:55 DM 204 LB TEST 2 6
10 FEB 99 05:04 AM 204 LB TEST 2 7
10 FEB 99 05:13 AM 203 LB TEST 2 8
10 FEB 99 85:22 AM 204 LB TEST 2 9
10 FEB 99 05:31 AM 203 LB TEST 2 10
10 FEB 99 05:41 AM 204 LB TEST 2 11
10 FEB 99 05:50 AM 204 LB TEST 2 12
10 FEB 99 06:01 AM 204 LB TEST I 13
10 FEB 99 06:12 AM 204 LB TEST 2 14
10 FEB 99 06:20 AM 204 LB TEST 2 15
10 FEB 99 06:30 AM 203 LB TEST 2 16
10 FEB 99 06:40 AM 205 LB TEST 2 17
10 FEB 99 06:52 AM 203 LB TEST 2 18
10 FEB 99 07:02 AM 205 LB TEST 2 19
10 FEB 99 07:12 AM 204 LB TEST 2 20
10 FEB 99 07:23 AM 204 LB TEST 2 21
10 FEB 99 07:33 AM 206 LB TEST 2 22
TIME & DflTE TOTAL WEIGHT ID NO. TOTAL WEIBHMENTS
10 FEB 99 07:40 AM 4284 LB TEST 2 22
-------
2 12 1999
GULP ALUMINUM ALLOYS
PRODUCTION REPORT - DETAIL MATERIAL CHARGED
Melt Number 9<
Product Number 862201
Furnace Number 1
Material Number
'0150221
-0150221
70150221
70150221
70150221
70150221
70150221
70150217
70150230
70150221
70150221
70150221
70150230
70150230
70150221
70150217
70150217
70150217
70150221
-0150217
70150230
70150221
70150221
70150230
70150221
70150221
70160501
70150230
70150221
70150221
70150221
70150221
70150230
70150221
70150221
70150230
70150230
70150230
70150221
70150230
70150221
70150230
70150221
70150221
70150230
70150217
70160501
70150221
70150221
70150221
400
1 A384
Gross Weight
19:380
20.000
20.100
19,780
19.780
19.880
19,580
19,960
19.600
19.860
19.420
19.860
20.040
20.180
20.040
20.040
20.020
20.220
19.940
19.720
19.660
20.320
19.320
19.960
20.020
20.280
23.100
19.560
20.260
19.580
19.840
20.000
20,000
19.940
19.940
20.120
19,980
20.040
20,100
20,040
19.980
19,980
20,080
20,040
20,120
19,880
22.260
19,400
19,460
19,440
1 Sec Alum Ingot
Tare Weight Net
18.660
18.660
18,660
18,660
18,660
18,660
18.660
18,660
18,660
18,660
18,660
18.660
18.660
18,660
18.660
18,660
18.660
18,660
18,660
18.660
18.660
18.660
18.660
18.660
18.660
18.660
18,660
,18.660
18.660
18.660
18.660
18,660
18,660
18,660
18,660
18.660
18,660
18,660
18,660
18,660
18,660
18.660
18.660
18,660
18,660
18,660
18,660
18,660
18.660
18.660
Weight
720
1,340
1,440
1,120
1,120
1,220
920
1,300
940
1,200
760
1.200
1.380
1,520
1,380
1,380
1,360
1.560
1.280
1,060
1,000
1.660
660
1,300
1.360
1,620
4,440
900
1,600
920
1,180
1.340
1,340
1,280
1,280
1,460
1,320
1,380
1,440
1,380
1,320
1,320
1,420
1,380
1,460
1,220
3,600
740
800
780
Charge Date
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/1 1/1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/11,1999
02/11/1999
02/11,1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/1 1/1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/1 1' 1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
Melt Started
11:15
02-11-1999
mackeyr
Charge Time Clock
11:25:12
1 :27:17
1 :29:16
1 :31:20
! :34:59
1 :38:25
1 :40:12
1 :42:26
:44:16
:45:56
:47:50
:51:li
:53:50
:56:53
:59:54
12:03:10
12:06.13
12:10.42
12:15:01
12:18:38
12:22:36
12:26:34
12:31:15
12:35:32
12:46:02
12:53:44
13:18.55
13:19:16
13:26:21
13:29:59
13:35:11
13:38:04
13:43:42
13:48:40
13:52:24
13:57:24
14:01:26 , _
14:05:25
14:10:22
14:14:41
14:18:27
14:21:24
14:26:10
14:30:03
14:35:29
14:40:57
15:13:49
15:17:33
15:19:40
15:21:54
Melt
Stopped
23:45
02-1
-1999
washbumw
Number
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02145
02145
02145
02145
Shift
1
I
1
1
1
i
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
Rev OS 18/1998
-------
J 12, 19VV
GULP ALUMINUM ALLOYS
PRODUCTION REPORT - DETAIL MATERIAL CHARGED
Melt Number 99A05400
Product Number 862201
Furnace Number 1
Material Number Gross
70150221
70150221
70150221
70150219
70150219
70150221
70150221
70160301
70150221
70150221
70150221
70150221
70150221
70150219
70150221
70150221
70160301
70150221
70150221
70150221
70150221
70150217
70160301
70150221
70150221
70150221
70160501
70150221
70160301
70150221
70150221
70150221
70150221
70150217
70150221
70150221
70150219
70150219
70150219
70150221
70160501
70150219
70150219
70150221
70150221
70150221
70150221
70150221
70150221
70150221
A3S4.
Weight
19.440
19.640
19.500
19.380
20.040
19.500
19,540
20.620
19.460
19.420
19.400
19.380
19.300
19.460
19.580
19.420
20.400
19.500
19.500
19.500
19.380
21.420
20.080
19.440
19.460
19.480
22.000
19.440
20.120
19.440
19.480
19.380
19.960
19.920
19.480
19.420
19,620
19,500
19.520
19,940
19,920
19,460
19,640
19,760
19,640
19,760
19,380
19,360
19,500
19,480
1 Sec Alum Ingot
Tare Weight
18.660
18.660
18,660
18.660
18.660
18.660
18.660
18.660
18.660
18.660
18.660
18.660
18.660
18.660
18.660
18.660
18.660
18.660
18.660
18.660
18.660
18.660
18.660
18.660
18.660
18.660
18.660
; 18.660
18.660
18.660
18.660
18.660
18.660
18.660
18.660
18.660
18.660
18.660
18.660
18.660
18.660
18.660
18.660
18.660
18.660
18.660
18.660
18.660
18.660
18.660
Net Weight
780
980
840
720
1,380
840
880
1,960
800
760
740
720
640
800
920
760
1,740
840
840
840
720
2,760
1,420
780
800
820
3,340
780
1,460
780
820
720
1.300
1,260
820
760
960
840
860
1,280
1,260
800
980
1,100
980
1,100
720
700
840
820
Charge Date
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/1 1/1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
02/11/1999
Melt Started
11:15
02-11-1999
mackeyr
Charge Time Clock
15:24:09
15:27:47
15:31.44
15:37:12
15:39:54
15:44:22
15:46:31
15.51-06
15:58:50
16:01.28
16:03.47
16.06.34
16:09:31
16.11-38
16-14.28
16:18:31
16:20-32
16:25:19
16-27-48
16:30:02
16:32-34
16:35:51
16:42:18
16.46:30
16:49:12
16:52-17
17:30-10
17.38:18
18:01.23
18:03:51
18-05:49
18:07:53
18:10:25
18.19:50
18:22:35
18:26:41
18:29-38
18:32:53
18:35:26
18:38:13
18:50:39
18.54:22
18:57:15
19:01:41
19:04:19
19:07:03
19:10:07
19:12:19
19:14:51
19:17:26
Melt Stopped
23:45
02-1
1-1999
washburrm
Number
02145
02145
02145
02145
02145
02145
02145
02145
02145
02145
02145
02145
02145
02145
02145
02145
02145
02145
02145
02145
02145
02145
02145
02145
02145
02145
02145
02145
02145
02145
02145
02145
02145
02145
02145
02145
02145
02145
02145
02145
02145
02145
02145
02145
02145
02145
02145
02145
02145
02145
Shift
i
T
1
t
1
1
1
•>
1
-)
1
~l
1
-)
-)
T
•>
^
i
->
i
t
->
i
^
->
-)
•>
-)
i
1
i
2
i
2
2
i
^
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Rev 08/18/1998
-------
1 12. 199S)
GULP ALUMINUM ALLOYS
PRODUCTION REPORT - DETAIL MATERIAL CHARGED
Melt Number
Product Number
Furnace Number 1
Material Number
70150221
70160301
70150221
70150221
70150221
70150221
99A05400
862201
A384 1 Sec Alum Incot
Melt Started
11:15
02-11-1999
mackeyr
Melt Stopped
23.45
02-11-1999
washbunm
Gross Weight
19.380
19.600
19.600
19.520
19.540
19.540
2.101.640
Tare Weight Net \\eight
18,660 720
18,660 940
18.660 940
18,660 860
18,660 880
18,660 880
Charge Date
02/11 1999
02/11 1999
02/1 i 1999
02/11 1999
02/11 1999
02/11 1999
Charge Time
19:20:08
19:22 26
19:25:19
19:28-19
19.31:11
19:33-47
Clock Number
02145
02145
02145
02145
02145
02145
Shift
2
2
1,977,960
123,680
Rev. 08/18/1998
-------
2 12/iyyy
GULP ALUMINUM ALLOYS
PRODUCTION REPORT - DETAIL PRODUCTION/DOWNTIME HOURS REPORTED
Melt Number 99A05400
Product Number 862201
Furnace Number 1
Bundles Produced 56
Charge Weight 123,680
A384 1 Sec Alum Ingot
Melt Started
11.15
02-11-1999
mackeyr
Melt Stopped
23:45
02-11-1999
washburnw
Total Cycle Time
Operation Code
22CT001
22CT1AL
22CT1CG
22CT1CO
22CT1TP
Description
CYCLETIME REVERB F#l
ALLOY TIME FURNJ1
CHARGE TIME FURN.tfl
CLEAN OFF FURNJ1
TAP TIME FURNJ1
(100 ths)
12.50
Total Hours
12.50
Production Hours
(100 ths)
0.25
750
1.25
350
12.50
Rev 08/18/1998
-------
IT
U/
ol
00: 01
—&"-^~i
TOT
0^10
~TZ
K7
~^n\
rr
o\\
LCI
53
15)
Cb.'S0
~~af~:~LQ
OO:LO
"oft^O
00:
a*?
~a^
n
Ui
L2)
0)1
Qlo
on
0?
10!
trhl
Shi
09
: ic
09
: oo
H9
"^
sv n
K
-------
i i
i i
i i
i i
! !
i !
I !
i I
; i
I i
o
(A
-ft
_£>
N
o
"b
o\
J)
cQ
P
-a
o
o
en
-4>
-0
5
I
r
r
I
00
4
c
TJ
0)
1
B
i/-,^
C ! t)
ft)
7-
£
rti
F
c
TO
0
n\
u
|a
'?
o
o
T)
Bl
b
•TO
(/^
c^
-------
GULP ALUMINUM ALLOYS
PRODUCTION REPORT - DETAIL MATERIAL CHARGED
Melt Number 99A05600
Product Number 862201
Furnace Number 1
Material Number Gross
70150221
70150221
70150221
70150221
70150221
70150217
70150221
70150221
70150230
70150221
70150230
70150222
70150221
70150217
70150230
70150217
70150230
70150221
70150230
70150221
70150230
70150230
70150221
70150217
70150221
70150217
70150217
70150221
70150221
70150217
70150217
70150217
70150221
70150221
70150221
70150230
70150221
70150221
70150230
70160302
70160501
70160501
70150221
70150221
70150221
70150221
70150221
70150221
70150221
70150221
A3S4
Weight
19,540
19,540
19,500
19,460
19,480
19.600
19,400
19,500
20,200
19,420
19,700
19,500
19,360
19.560
19,460
19,440
19.560
19,520
19,440
19.560
19.460
19,520
19,440
19.460
19,420
19,480
19,520
19.520
19.520
19.460
19,380
19,500
19,540
19,380
19.340
1 9,440
19,420
19,600
19,600
20,040
22,840
20,640
19,700
19,500
19,480
19,480
19,520
19,500
19,420
19,500
1 Sec Alum Ingot
Tare Weight Net
18,660
18,660
18.660
18,660
18,660
18,660
18,660
18,660
18,660
18,660
18.660
18.660
18.660
18,660
18,660
18,660
18,660
18.660
18.660
18.660
18.660
18.660
18.660
18.660
18.660
18.660
18.660
.18,660
18.660
18.660
18,660
18,660
18,660
18,660
18.660
18,660
18,660
18,660
18,660
18,660
18,660
18,660
18,660
18,660
18,660
18,660
18,660
18,660
18,660
18,660
Weight
880
880
840
800
820
940
740
840
1,540
760
1,040
840
700
900
800
780
900
860
780
900
800
860
780
800
760
820
860
860
860
800
720
840
880
720
680
780
760
940
940
1,380
4,180
1,980
1,040
840
820
820
860
840
760
840
Charge Date
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
Melt Started
1000
02-12-1999
mackeyr
Charge Time Clock
10:10:20
10:11:58
10:13:54
10:16:00
10:17:38
10.19:02
10:21.05
10:22-45
10:27:11
10:29-32
10:35:15
10-37:52
10:41:47
10:44-04
10:46 18
10.49-27
10:52.12
10:5503
10:58.02
1 :01 01
1 :03.27
1 :05.59
1 :11:40
1 :!5:05
1 :18.03
1 .20:56
1 :23-37
1 :26.30
1 :2944
1 :32.30
1 :36:27
I :39.39
11:4249
11:45:39
11:49:07
11:52.06
11:55:01
11:58:25
12:01:41
12:08:27
12:31:42
12:35:46
12:40:17
12:44:39
12:48:26
12:51:04
12:54:12
12:57:01
12:59:29
13:02:44
Melt Stopped
2300
02-12-1999
washbumw
Number
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
Shift
1
. 1
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
I
1
1
t
1
1
I
I
1
1
i
1
{
1
1
1
1
1
E
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
i
I
I
I
I
I
1
1
t
1
t
I
Rev 08/18/1998
-------
GULP ALUMINUM ALLOYS
PRODUCTION REPORT - DETAIL MATERIAL CHARGED
Melt Number 99A05600
Product Number 862201
Furnace Number 1
Material Number Gross
70150221
70150217
70150230
70150221
70150217
70150217
70150217
70150221
70150217
70150217
70150217
70150221
70150217
70150221
70150221
70150222
7015022!
70150221
70150221
7015022!
70150221
70160302
70150230
70150222
70150230
70150230
70150217
70150221
70150217
70160302
70160302
70150217
70150221
70150221
70150230
70150221
70150221
70150221
70150221
70150221
70150221
70160501
70160301
70160301
70150230
70150221
70150221
70150221
70150221
70150221
A384
Weight
19,500
19,380
19,500
19,440
19,480
19,540
19,440
19.440
19,560
19,520
19.500
19,560
19,580
19.440
19,600
19.340
19,620
19,700
19,400
19.840
19,440
20,040
19,560
19,460
19,960
19.500
19,600
19,600
19,620
19,940
20.060
20,340
19,580
19,640
19.340
19,680
19,440
19,820
19,420
19,500
19,540
20,960
20,100
19,720
20,980
19,540
19,340
19,440
19,740
19,420
1 Sec Alum Ingot
Tare Weight Net
18,660
18.660
18,660
18.660
18,660
18,660
18,660
18,660
18,660
18,660
18.660
18,660
18,660
18.660
18.660
18,660
18.660
18.660
18.660
18.660
18.660
18.660
18.660
18,660
18.660
18,660
18,660
.18.660
18,660
18,660
18.660
18.660
18.660
18,660
18.660
18,660
18,660
18,660
18,660
18,660
18,660
18,660
18,660
18,660
18,660
18,660
18.660
18,660
18,660
18,660
Weight
840
720
840
780
820
880
780
780
900
860
840
900
920
780
940
680
960
1.040
740
. 1.180
780
1.380
900
800
1.300
840
940
940
960
1.280
1.400
1.680
920
980
680
1.020
780
1,160
760
840
880
2,300
1,440
1,060
2,320
880
680
780
1,080
760
Charge Date
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12'1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/1 2 -'1999
02/12/1999
02/12 1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02 '12/ 1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/E2/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
Melt Started
10-00
02-12-1999
mackevr
Charge Time Clock
13:03.21
13:05:58
13.08:09
13:10:35
13:12:58
13:15:48
13:18:01
13:20:02
13:22:08
13:24:29
13:26:51
13-29:26
13-31:47
13-34:17
13.37:08
13.40:15
13:43:00
13-45:56
13:4939
13:52:31
13.56-19
14:01 11
14:05.56
14:24:18
1426:45
14-29:10
1431:47
14-34:08
14.36:26
14:40:00
14:44-00
14-47:30
1450:43
14:53-26
14:57:54
15:00:24
15.03.22
15.06:52
15:10:00
15:14:15
15:16:46
15:20.50
15:25:09
15:32:25
15:36:55
15:42:18
15:44:58
15:49:01
15:53:03
15:56:51
Melt Stopped
23:00
02-12-
1999
washburmv
Number
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02199
02145
02145
02145
02145
02145
02145
02145
02145
02145
02145
02145
02145
Shift
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Rev. 08/18/1998
-------
GULP ALUMINUM ALLOYS
PRODUCTION REPORT - DETAIL MATERIAL CHARGED
Melt. Number 99A05600
Product Number 862201 A384.1
Furnace Number 1
Material Number
"0 1 5022 1
'0150221
70150230
70150221
70150221
70150221
70160501
70160301
70150221
70150221
70150221
"0150221
"0150230
70150221
"0150221
"0150221
"0160401
"0150221
"0150221
"0150221
70150221
70150221
70150221
70150221
"0150221
70150221
"0150221
70160301
"0150221
"0150221
70150221
Gross Weight
19,760
19,580
20.740
19,660
19,560
19,440
19,800
19.700
19.520
19,480
19,440
19.580
20.660
19.440
19.580
19.500
19.600
19.520
19.500
19.500
19.560
20.720
19.540
19.540
19.440
19.460
19.580
19,620
19.500
19.360
19.640
Sec Alum Ingot
Melt Started Melt Stopped
10.00 23:00
02-12-1999 02-12-1999
mackeyr washbum\\
Tare Weight Net Weight Charge Date Charge Time Clock Number Shift
18,660
18,660
18,660
18,660
18,660
18,660
18,660
18,660
18,660
18.660
18,660
18,660
18,660
18,660
18,660
18,660
18,660
18,660
18,660
18,660
18,660
18,660
18,660
18,660
18.660
18,660
18,660
,18,660
18.660
18,660
18.660
1.100
920
2.080
1.000
900
780
1,140
1,040
860
820
780
920
2.000
780
920
840
940
860
840
840
900
2.060
880
880
780
800
920
960
840
700
980
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02 '12,- 1999
02.' 12' 1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
02/12/1999
16:01:53
16:05:37
16:26:23
16.28:26
16:30:34
16:33:19
16.35:48
16:38:52
16:44.28
16-46.36
16:48:59
16:51:47
1702.17
17.06:46
17:11:00
17:15:31
17:20:04
17-23:09
17-26.14
17.29:55
17:33:29
17-37:40
17:42-04
1745.25
17-50-55
1754.48
1758:56
18:04:03
18.07-53
18-11:38
18 15 04
02145 1
02145 1
02145 I
02145 1
02145 1
02145 1
02145 1
02145
02145
02145
02145
02145
02145
02145
02145
02145
02145
02145
02145 I
02145 1
02145 1
02145 1
02145 1
02145 1
02145 1
02145 1
02145 1
02145 I
02145 1
02145 1
02145 1
2.572,580
2,444,460
128.120
Re% 08/18/1998
-------
GULP ALUMINUM ALLOYS
PRODUCTION REPORT - DETAIL PRODUCTION/DOWNTIME HOURS REPORTED
Melt Number 99A05600
Product Number 862201
Furnace Number 1
Bundles Produced 66
Charge Weight 128.120
A384.1 Sec Alum Incot
iMelt Started
10:00
02-12-1999
mackeyr
Melt Stopped
23:00
02-12-1999
washburnw
Operation Code
22CT001
22CT1CG
22CT1CO
22CT1TP
Total Cvcle Time
Description
CYCLETIME REVERB F#l
CHARGE TIME FURNJ1
CLEAN OFF FURN.#1
TAP TIME FURN.tfl
(100 ths)
13.00
Total Hours
13.00
Production Hours
(100 ths)
7.25
1.75
4.00
13.00
Rev 08/18/1998
-------
vo
"-
e-
i§
\
O
fc
»o
V>
8
X •
fc
K
~ *
8 "4
.
|S.£
V
8
X,
w
f
8
0
§
8 8 L
V.
o
•O
V
w
X.
N)
t?
«
vA
E
w
r
r
M
-Ji
o
o
TC-
6
70
C
f
9
0
I
M
ff\
0
6
s
c-o*
-------
' I
I I
(*
t 1
c»
^
^
* t
-c,
o
V
\i
f
*• |
*
tj
* t
O
0
\
\j
—
- *
O
V
M
-
* •
o
^*C
N^
0 J5
o ||^
S
,|00
I
s
ex)
(S
Cn
70
C
T-
T»
10
-s
-------
Sli IK Traaniui
-701 50262
Stroatiim Rod
7 O 1 6O4 52
Titanium - Raw Material
7O16O6O1
Trailer Sides
Jill Hill III
7O15O225
0/C Rug Patterns
7O14 O2 67
0/C Valve Bodies
70140266
Onclean CO XL Radiators
7C 1 6O3O2
Wiodov Scr*«n ^r
IHBHIIiniHIIlllllllI
Sodiv
7O16OO17
Tanker Material
iiHiimnKiiiifitii
7O15O224
Titanium Waffle
701606O2
0/C Cast
7 O14O2 65
0/C Tire Molds
7 O14 O272
Unclean Aluminum -Raw Material
70 150255
70140101
Venetian Blinds
i ii inn mil mi
7O15O254
Zinc - Sows
IIIIIII
70150277
-------
Pencil Tops
7015O235
Pistons W/Cut Rods
7O14 O269
Pistons W/Rings, Rods t Strata
7014O268
Purchased Aim Sows 356
"7O16O861
Rivets Clean
Jill 111 Hill II
7015O276
Road Signs
7O15O222
Shavings, Turnings
70150217
Shredded Aluminum
in linn inn i
7015O221
Shredded Casts
Sli t» Mixed
uiiyi
7O1SO273
7O15O247
Purchased Aluminum Sows
7016O841
Rivets Unclean
7O15O229
Shredded Clips
70150231
Silicon - Raw Material
7O16O5O1
Sli ZR Extrusions
7O15O2 64
Sli IR Sheet
IIIIIIIII!
7O15O2 63
-------
Clips
giii
701502O7
CD Coated Wire
7 O15O25O
Diesel Pistons
70140274
E. C. Wire
mil inn mil
7 O15O22O
Ferro-Phos
inn IIIB inn
70160305
Honeycomb - Epoxy
mi mil mi ii •
7 O15O2 4 4
Irony Die Cast
III 111 111
7O14 O252
Knockouts
mil 1! inn
70150253
Magnesium
mil inn mil
7O16O8O1
Manufactured Aluminum Sows
nil mi linn
7O16O821
Mixed Segregated
7015O218
Nickel
.11111
7016O3O3
Complete Transmissions
7 O 14 O257
Die Cast
nil mil
7015024 9
Dross
mill
7O16O4 51
Extrusions, Pipe
mi inn i inn mi
7O15O216
Furnace Iron - Raw Material
Honeycomb
mi mil i
70150236
Irony Unshreddable
IIIIIIIIHII
7O14O275
Litho
IIII! II
7O150211
Mixed Low Copper
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiininii
7 O15O21O
New Cast
7 O15O2O4
Painted
_
7O15O214
1
:
-------
|1 Aluminum
i ii inn inn ii
7O15O245
20/24
IIIII
7O15O2O9
Aircraft Material
70150223
Aluminum Cans
ii inn i inn in
7O15O213
Aluminum Mixed Clean
111 mini inn
7O15O2O6
Aluminum Sheet
7O16O3O4
Clean Aluminum Radiators
in inn linn
7O15O232
Clean Pipe
7015O258
Clean Solids, Plate
7O15O219
Clean Transmissions
7O15O233
|2 Aluminum
i inn inn mil L
7 O15O2 4 6
70/75
70150208
Airplane Material
70150256
Aluminum Clean - Raw Material
7O1502O1
Aluminum Recovery
70140271
Bridge Beams
II111IIII
7 O15O259
Cast Aluminum
ii inn inn mi 111
7O15O2 O3
CL CO AL Radiators-Raw Mtrl.
7O16O3O1
Clean Cast, SHeet
III IIIIIIUI1I
7O15O234'
Clean Pistons
II Hill I Hill III
7O15O226
Clean Tire Molds
------- |