530-SW-90-029A
CHARACTERIZATION OF MUNICIPAL WASTE COMBUSTION ASH, ASH
EXTRACTS, AND LEACHATES. COALITION ON RESOURCE RECOVERY
AND THE ENVIRONMENT
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION PAGE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES-1
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1-1
1.1 BACKGROUND 1-1
1.2 SCOPEOFWORK 1-2
2.0 FACILITY ZA FINDINGS 2-1
2.1 FACILITYZA DESCRIPTION 2-1
2.2 CHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF ASH 2-3
2.3 CHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF LEACHATES 2-3
2.4 CHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF ASH EXTRACTS 2-4
3.0 FACILITY ZB FINDINGS 3-1
3.1 FACILITY ZB DESCRIPTION 3-1
3.2 CHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF ASH 3-3
3.3 CHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF LEACHATES 3-4
3.4 CHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF ASH EXTRACTS 3-5
4.0 FACILITY ZC FINDINGS 4-1
4.1 FACILITY ZC DESCRIPTION 4-1
4.2 CHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF ASH 4-2
4.3 CHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF LEACHATES 4-3
4.4 CHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF ASH EXTRACTS 4-4
5.0 FACILITY ZD FINDINGS 5-1
5.1 FACILITY ZD DESCRIPTION 5-1
5.2 CHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF ASH 5-2
5.3 CHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF LEACHATES 5-3
5.4 CHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF ASH EXTRACTS 5-5
6.0 FACILITY ZE FINDINGS 6-1
6.1 FACILITY ZE DESCRIPTION 6-1
6.2 CHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF ASH 6-2
6.3 CHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF LEACHATES 6-3
6.4 CHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF ASH EXTRACTS 6-4
7.0 SUMMARY OF RESULTS 7-1
7.1 CHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF ASH 7-1
7.2 CHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF LEACHATES 7-3
7.3 CHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF ASH EXTRACTS 7-4
REFERENCES R-1
APPENDICES
A FINAL WORK PLAN
B ASH RESULTS
C LEACHATE RESULTS
D ASH EXTRACT RESULTS
R339911
-------
TABLES
NUMBER v PAGE
ES-1 Major Features of MWC Facilities ES-4
ES-2 Major Features of MWC Ash Disposal Facilities ES-6
ES-3 Ash Dioxin Results ES-8
ES-4 Comparison of Ash Extract Metal Analyses Results with ES-12
Leachate Metal Analyses Results
1-1 Sample Analyses 1-4
2-1 Restricted Wastes, Facility ZA 2-6
2-2 Ash Semivoiatile Results-Sample ZA-AH-003, Facility ZA 2-7
2-3 Ash Dioxin Results - Sample ZA-AH-003, Facility ZA 2-8
2-4 Ash Metals Analyses, Facility ZA 2-9
2-5 Ash Conventional Analyses, Facility ZA 2-10
2-6 Leachate Semivoiatile Analyses, Facility ZA 2-11
2-7 Leachate Metals Analyses, Facility ZA 2-12
2-8 Leachate Conventional Analyses, Facility ZA 2-13
2-9 Leachate Dioxin Analyses, Facility ZA 2-14
2-10 Comparison of Ash Extracts Semivoiatile Analyses with Leachate . 2-15
Semivoiatile Analyses, Ranges of Concentrations, Facility ZA
2-11 Comparison of Ash Extracts Metals Analyses with Leachate 2-16
Metals Analyses, Ranges of Concentrations, Facility ZA
2-12 Comparison of Ash Extracts Conventional Analyses with 2-17
Leachate Conventional Analyses, Ranges of
Concentrations, Facility ZA
3-1 Ash Semivoiatile Results-Sample ZB-AH-001, Facility ZB 3-7
3-2 Ash Dioxin Results-Sample ZB-AH-001, Facility ZB 3-8
3-3 Ash Metals Analyses, Facility ZB 3-9
3-4 Ash Conventional Analyses, Facility ZB 3-10
3-5 Leachate Metals Analyses, Facility ZB 3-11
3-6 Leachate Conventional Analyses, Facility ZB 3-12
3-7 Leak Detection System Sample Metals Analyses, Facility ZB 3-13
3-8 Leak Detection System Sample Conventional Analyses, 3-14
FacilityZB
3-9 Comparison of Ash Extracts Metals Analyses with Leachate 3-15
Metals Analyses, Ranges of Concentrations, Facility ZB
3-10 Comparison of Ash Extracts Conventional Analyses with 3-16
Leachate Conventional Analyses, Ranges of Concentrations,
FacilityZB
4-1 Ash Semivoiatile Results - Sample ZC-AH-003, Facility ZC 4-6
4-2 Ash Dioxin Results - Sample ZC-AH-003, Facility ZC 4-7
4-3 Ash Metals Analyses, Facility ZC 4-8
4-4 Ash Conventional Analyses, Facility ZC 4-9
4-5 Leachate Metals Analyses, Facility ZC 4-10
4-6 Leachate Conventional Analyses, Facility ZC 4-11
4-7 Comparison of Ash Extracts Metals Analyses with Leachate 4-12
Metals Analyses, Ranges of Concentrations, Facility ZC
4-8 Comparison of Ash Extracts Conventional Analyses with Leachate 4-13
Conventional Analyses, Ranges of Concentrations, Facility ZC
5-1 Ash Semivoiatile Results - Sample ZD-AH-003, Facility ZD 5-7
5-2 Ash Dioxin Results - Sample ZD-AH-003, Facility ZD 5-8
R339911
-------
TABLES (Continued)
NUMBER PAGE
5-3 Ash Metals Analyses, Facility ZD 5-9
5-4 Ash Conventional Analyses, Facility ZD 5-10
5-5 Leachate Metals Analyses, Facility ZD 5-11
5-6 Leachate Conventional Analyses, Facility ZD 5-12
5-7 Comparison of Ash Extract Semivolatile Results to Leachate 5-13
Semivolatile Results, Facility ZD
5-8 Comparison of Ash Extracts Metals Analyses with Leachate 5-14
Metals Analyses, Ranges of Concentrations, Facility ZD
5-9 Comparison of Ash Extracts Conventional Analyses with Leachate . 5-15
Conventional Analyses, Ranges of Concentrations, Facility ZD
6-1 Acceptable Waste, Facility ZE 6-5
6-2 Ash Dioxin Results-Sample ZE-AH-003, Facility ZE 6-6
6-3 Ash Metals Analyses, Facility ZE 6-7
6-4 Ash Conventional Analyses, Facility ZE 6-8
6-5 Leachate Semivolatile Analyses, Facility ZE 6-9
6-6 Leachate Metals Analyses, Facility ZE 6-10
6-7 Leachate Conventional Analyses, Facility ZE 6-11
6-8 Comparison of Ash Extract Semivolatile Results to Leachate 6-12
Semivolatile Results, Ranges of Concentrations, Facility ZE
6-9 Comparison of Ash Extracts Metals Analyses with Leachate 6-13
Metals Analyses, Ranges of Concentrations, Facility ZE
6-10 Comparison of Ash Extracts Conventional Analyses with Leachate . 6-14
Conventional Analyses, Ranges of Concentrations, Facility ZE
7-1 Comparison of Ash Semivolatile Results 7-6
7-2 Ranges of Concentrations of Semivolatiles in Fly Ash, Bottom Ash, . 7-7
and Combined Ash from Municipal Waste Incinerators
7-3 Ash Dioxin Results 7-8
7-4 Ranges of Concentrations of PCDDs, PCDFs, and PCBs in Fly Ash, ... 7-9
Bottom Ash, and Combined Ash From Municipal Waste Incinerators
7-5 Ash Metals Analyses, Ranges of Concentrations 7-11
7-6 Ranges of Concentrations of Inorganic Constituents in Fly Ash, ... 7-12
Combined Ash, and Bottom Ash from Municipal Waste Incinerators
7-7 Ash Conventional Analyses, Ranges of Concentrations 7-14
7-8 Leachate Semivolatile Results, Ranges of Concentrations 7-15
7-9 Concentrations of Organic Constituents in Leachate from 7-16
Municipal Waste Landfills, Ash Monofills, and Co-Disposal Sites
7-10 Leachate Dioxin Results, Ranges of Concentrations 7-18
7-11 Concentrations of PCDDs/PCDFsm Leachates from Ash Monofills, . 7-19
Ranges of Concentrations
7-12 Leachate Metals Analyses, Ranges of Concentrations 7-20
7-13 Ranges of Leachate Concentrations of Inorganic 7-21
Constituents from Monofills
7-14 Leachate Conventional Analyses, Ranges of Concentrations 7-23
7-15 Ranges of Extract Concentrations of Organic Constituents From .. 7-24
Municipal Waste Incinerator Combined Fly Ash and Bottom Ash
for Three Leaching Procedures
7-16 Ash Extracts Metals Analyses, Ranges of Concentrations 7-25
Comparison of Literature Values with Results Obtained During
CORRE Study
R339911 IV
-------
FIGURES
NUMBER PAGE
5-1 Water Quality Lysimeter Installation Detail 5-4
R339911
-------
ACRONYMS AND DEFINITIONS
ASTM
AWQC
CDC
Co-Disposal
CORRE
EP
EPA
ESP
9
kg
L
MCL
mg
Monofill
MSW
MWC
MWEP
ND
PAHs
PCBs
PCDDs
PCDFs
pg
ppb
ppt
QA/QC
RCRA
SMCL
SW-924
TCLP
IDS
TE
TEF
TOC
ug
American Society for Testing and Materials
Ambient Water Quality Criteria
Centers for Disease Control
Disposal together of municipal solid wastes and municipal solid
waste combustion ashes
Coalition on Resource Recovery and the Environment
Extraction Procedure
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Electrostatic Precipitator
grams
kilograms
liter
Maximum Contaminant Level
milligrams
A landfill that contains only solid waste combustion ashes and
residues
Municipal Solid Wastes
Municipal Waste Combustion
Monofilled Waste Extraction Procedure, also known as SW-924
Not detected.
Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons
Polychlorinated Biphenyls
Polychlorinateddibenzo-p-dioxins
Polychlorinated dibenzofurans
picogram
parts per billion
parts per trillion
Quality Assurance/Quality Control
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
Secondary Maximum Contaminant Level
Deionized Water Extraction Test Method
Toxic Characteristics Leaching Procedure Test Method
Total Dissolved Solids
Toxicity Equivalents
Toxic Equivalency Factors
Total Organic Carbon
micrograms
R339911
VI
-------
ACRONYMS AND DEFINITIONS (Continued)
TCDD
PeCDO
HxCDD
HpCDD
OCDD
TCDF
PeCDF
HxCDF
HpCDF
OCDF
Tetrachioro Dibenzo-p-Dioxin
Pentachloro Dibenzo-p-Dioxin
Hexachloro Dibenzo-p-Dioxin
Heptachloro Dibenzo-p-Dioxin
Octachloro Dibenzo-p-Dioxin
Tetrachioro Dibenzofuran
Pentachloro Dibenzofuran
Hexachloro Dibenzofuran
Heptachloro Dibenzofuran
Octachloro Dibenzofuran
R339911
VII
-------
This report has undergone internal review by the United States Environmental
Protection Agency and by the Coalition on Resource Recovery and the Environment
and has been subjected to peer review as well.
Peer Reviewers
Frank J. Roethel, Ph.D. David S. Kosson, Ph.D.
Research Professor Research Professor
Marine Sciences Research Center College of Engineering
Waste Management Institute Department of Chemical and
SUNY Biochemical Engineering
Stoneybrook, New York Rutgers University
Piscataway, New Jersey
Taylor Eighmy
Research Professor
Department of Civil Engineering
University of New Hampshire
Durham, New Hampshire
R339911
-------
"Publication of this document shall not be construed as endorsement of the views
expressed herein by The United States Conference of Mayors, the Conference of
Mayors Research and Education Foundation, or any federal funding agency."
R339911
-------
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
-------
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This report has been prepared for the United States Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) and the Coalition on Resource Recovery and the Environment (CORRE).
EPA and CORRE have cosponsored this study, conducted by NUS Corporation, to
enhance the data base on the characteristics of Municipal Waste Combustion (MWC)
ashes, laboratory extracts of MWC ashes, and leachates from MWC ash disposal
facilities.
The Coalition on Resource Recovery and the Environment (CORRE) was established
to provide credible information about resource recovery and associated
environmental issues to the public and to public officials. In providing information,
CORRE takes no position as to the appropriateness of one technology compared to
others. CORRE recognizes that successful waste management is an integrated
utilization of many technologies which taken as a whole, are best selected by an
informed public and informed public officials.
Incineration of municipal solid waste (MSW) has become an important waste
disposal alternative because it provides an effective means of reducing the volume
of MSW as well as an important source of energy recovery. Currently, 10 percent of
MSW is incinerated. Based on the number of municipal waste combustion (MWC)
facilities being planned across the country, this percentage is expected to increase to
roughly 16-25 percent by the year 2000.
As incineration has grown in popularity, so has concern over the management of
increasing volumes of ash. Ashes from MWC facilities have, on occasion, exhibited a
hazardous waste characteristic as determined by the EP Toxicity Test. The debate
regarding the regulatory status of ash and the representativeness and validity of the
EP test continues. Congress is considering several legislative initiatives that would
give EPA clear authority to develop special management standards for ash under
Subtitle D of RCRA.
To conduct this study, NUS collected combined bottom and fly ash samples from five
mass-burn MWC facilities and leachate samples from the companion ash disposal
facilities.
R339911 ES-1
-------
The facilities sampled were selected by CORRE to meet the following criteria:
• The facilities were to be state-of-the-art facilities equipped with a variety of
pollution control equipment.
• The facilities were to be located in different regions of the United States.
• The companion ash disposal facilities were to be equipped with leachate
collection systems or some means of collecting leachate samples.
The identities of the facilities are being held in confidence.
The ash and leachate samples collected were analyzed for the Appendix IX
semivolatile compounds, polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins/polychlorinated
dibenzofurans (PCDDs/PCDFs), metals for which Federal primary and secondary
drinking water standards exist, and several miscellaneous conventional compounds.
In addition, the ash samples were analyzed for major components in the form of
oxides. The ash samples were also subjected to six laboratory extraction procedures
and the extracts were then analyzed for the same compounds as the ash samples.
The following six extraction procedures were used during this study:
• Acid Number 1 (EP-TOX).
• Acid Number 2 (TCLP Fluid No. 1).
• Acid Number 3 (TCLP Fluid No. 2).
• Deionized Water (Method SW-924), also known as the Monofill Waste
Extraction Procedure (MWEP).
• CO2 saturated deionized water.
• Simulated acid rain.
These extraction procedures have been used separately by a variety of researchers on
MWC ashes but never have all six procedures been used on the same MWC ashes.
This study was designed to compare the analytical results of the extracts from all six
procedures with each other and with leachate collected from the ash disposal
facilities used by the MWC facilities.
R339911 ES-2
-------
All sampling, laboratory preparation, and laboratory analysis followed stringent EPA
quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) procedures. The work was performed in
accordance with the Work Plan (Appendix A) prepared by NUS for this project and
with a QA/QC Plan prepared by NUS and approved by EPA. A detailed listing of the
positive results is presented in a data base which is included in this Report as
Appendix B (Ash), Appendix C (Leachate), and Appendix D (Ash Extracts). The results
in the data base are presented as reported by the laboratories, complete with the
laboratory's qualifications. Summaries of the results are presented in Sections 2.0
through 7.0. These summaries include the laboratory's qualifiers and also qualifiers
placed on the data as a result of data validation.
When the laboratories did not report a positive value for a compound (i.e., the
compound was not present above laboratory detection limits), the compound was
reported as not detected (ND) in the tables in the text. The laboratory detection
limits are the method detection limits for each specific method, unless interferences
were encountered during the analysis. When interferences occurred, the laboratory
adjusted the method detection limits by an appropriate dilution factor. The
analytical methods used in this study were selected so that the method detection
limits were well below present levels of human, environmental, or regulatory
concerns.
The EPA publication "Interim Procedures for Estimating Risk Associated with
Exposures to Mixtures of Chlorinated Dibenzo-p-Dioxins and Dibenzofurans (CDDs
and CDFs)" was used to evaluate the dioxin data. These procedures use Toxicity
Equivalency Factors (TEFs) to express the concentrations of the different isomers and
homologs as an equivalent amount of 2,3,7,8-Tetrachloro Dibenzo-p-Dioxin
(2,3,7,8-TCDD). The Toxicity Equivalents, as calculated by using the TEFs, are then
totaled and compared to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) recommended upper
level of 2,3,7,8-TCDD Toxicity Equivalency of 1 part per billion in residential soil
(Kimbrough, 1984).
The major features of the five MWC facilities are provided in Table ES-1, and the
major features of the MWC Ash Disposal Facilities are provided in Table ES-2.
Pertinent information regarding the operating conditions of the MWC facilities, as
well as information about the air pollution control equipment used by the facilities,
is also provided in Table ES-1.
R339911 ES-3
-------
TABLE ES-1
MAJOR FEATURES OF MWC FACILITIES
Operational
Features
Facility Type
Startup Date
Capacity
Combustion
Temperature
Temperature of
air entering the
boiler
Volume of air
entering boiler
Source of ash
quench water
Air pollution
control
equipment
Approximate
waste
composition
Facilities
ZA
Energy recovery,
continuous feed, reverse-
reciprocating grate.
May 1986
275 tons/day/boiler
2 boilers
1,800-2,000-F at stoker
Under fire: 250°F
Over fire: ambient
Under fire:
70,000-90,000 Ib/hour
Over fire:
41, 000 Ib/hour
Floor drams, rainwater.
Lime slurry is injected
into flue gas after
economizer, fabric filter
baghouses.
Residential: 40%
Commercial/
Light Industrial: 60%
ZB
Energy recovery,
continuous feed,
reciprocating grate
Early 1987
75-100 tons/day/boiler
2 boilers
1.800'F
Under fire: ambient
Over fire: ambient
Under fire:
1 0,890 cuft/min
Over fire:
5,900 cu ft/min
Cooling tower and boiler
blowdowns, septic system
discharge, floor drains.
Dry lime is injected into flue
gas after economizer, fabric
filter baghouses.
Fly ash has phosphoric acid
added to it and is
agglomerated before being
mixed with bottom ash
Residential: 80%
Commercial/
Light Industrial: 20%
ZC
Energy recovery,
continuous feed, reverse-
reciprocating grate.
January 1987
400 tons/day/boiler
3 boilers
1,750-1,800°F
Under fire: 380"F
Over fire: ambient
Under fire:
34,000 ftVmm
Over fire:
11,000ft3/min
Tertiary effluent from
neighboring sewage
treatment pi ant.
Electrostatic
precipitators.
Residential: 60%
Commercial/
Light Industrial: 40%
ZD
Energy recovery,
continuous feed,
reciprocating grate.
1975
750 tons/day/boiler
2 boilers
1 500-1 700°F flue gas as it
enters superheater
Under fire: ambient
Over fire: ambient
Under fire:
48,000 ft3/min
Over fire:
32,000 ft3/min
Cooling tower and boiler
blowdowns.
Electrostatic precipitators
Residential: 90%
Commercial/
Light Industrial: 10%
ZE
Energy recovery,
continuous feed,
reciprocating grate.
September 1987
750 tons/day/boiler
2 boilers
1 ,800°F at the grate
Under fire: ambient
Over fire: ambient
Wastewater from plant
processes.
Lime slurry is injected into
flue gas after economizer,
electrostatic precipitators.
Fly ash has water added to
t and is agglomerated
Defore being mixed with
sottom ash.
Residential: 65%
Commercial/
Light Industrial. 35%
m
i/»
-------
TABLE ES-1
MAJOR FEATURES OF MWC FACILITIES
PAGE TWO
Operational
Features
Amount of
electricity
generated
Amount of
electricity used
internally by
facility
Material
removed from
incoming refuse
Material
removed from
ash
ZA
13.1 megawatts/hour
1.7 megawatts/hour
Large appliances, other
unacceptable material
diverted to demolition
landfill.
Ferrous metal removed
from ash at the MWC
facility
Facilities
ZB
4.5 megawatts/hour
0 63 megawatts/hour
Large appliances, material
that will not pass through
the boilers.
None.
ZC
29 megawatts/hour
2.5 megawatts/hour
Large appliances,
material that will not
pass through the boilers.
Ferrous metal removed
from ash at the MWC
facility.
ZD
35 megawatts/hour
2.5to3.5
megawatts/hour
Large appliances.
material that wilt not
pass through the boilers.
Ferrous metal removed
from ash at the MWC
facility.
ZE
45 megawatts/hour
7 megawatts/hour
Large appliances, material
that will not pass through
the boilers
Items greater than
10 inches in diameter
tn
-------
TABLE ES-2
MAJOR FEATURES OF MWC ASH DISPOSAL FACILITIES
Operational
Features
Facility Type
Startup Date
Disposal Capacity
Amount of Ash
Disposed
Materials other
than Ash
disposed of
Leachate
Collection System
Cover
Compaction of
Ash
Facilities
ZA
Monofill - single clay
liner
1986
83,400 cubic yards
150 tons/day
None
Perforated PVC pipe in a
coarse aggregate
envelope
Final cover -soil and
HOPE
Only as bulldozer spreads
ash in ash fill.
ZB
Monofill - double liner
(HOPE and compacted till
soil)
October 1988
90,000-100,000 tons
60 tons/day
None
Slotted HDPE
Daily cover -sand. Non
working face covered by
plastic to limit leachate
generation
Bulldozer spreads and
compacts ash in 8- 1 2 inch
lifts.
ZC
Codisposed facility -
bottom-clay liner
synthetic sidewall liners
Landfill- 1984
Ash Disposal -1985
Total capacity 9 million
tons
400,000 tons/year.
40% ash (2/3 of ash from
ZC MWC facility)
Non-burnable materials
from 2 MWC facilities.
Overflow from 2nd MWC
facility.
Main header - PVC
collection trenches -
gravel with fabric filter
Daily - native soil and
shredded tires.
Intermediate - native
soils.
Final -native soils.
Track mounted
compactor.
ZD
Monofill - unlined. Ash is
placed over trash
deposited before 1975
1975
Remaining capacity -
990,000 tons (6 years)
450 tons/day
None
None - leachate samples
were collected from well
points installed in the ash
Daily cover -soil.
Intermediate -soil
compacted to 10-6
permeability.
Final -clay or HDPE.
Only as bulldozer spreads
ash in ash fill.
ZE
Monofill - double liner
(HDPE and clay)
1987
Permitted for 20 years,
approximately 3 8 million
tons
525 tons/day
None
Slotted HDPE
Daily cover -soil.
Intermediate -soil
compacted to 10 6
permeability
Final -clay of HDPE
Vibrating roller.
o>
-------
The major findings of the ash sampling and analyses during this study are described
in the following paragraphs.
Of the five ash samples (one from each facility) analyzed for the Appendix IX
semivolatile compounds, four samples contained bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate, three
contained di-n-butyl phthalate, and one contained di-n-octyl phthalate. Two PAHs,
phenanthrene and fluoranthene, were detected in only one of the five ash samples.
These semi-volatile compounds were detected in the parts per billion (ppb) range.
The results for the five ash samples (one from each facility) analyzed for
PCDDs/PCDFs are presented in Table ES-3. This table also includes the calculated
Toxicity Equivalents (TE) for each homolog of PCDD/PCDF. These TEs were calculated
using EPA's methodology (EPA, March 1987). The data in this table indicate that
PCDDs/PCDFs were found at extremely low levels in each ash sample. The Total TE
for each ash sample was below the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) recommended
2,3,7,8-TCDD Toxicity Equivalency limit of 1 part per billion in residential soil
(Kimbrough, 1984).
All 25 of the ash samples (five daily composites from each facility) were analyzed for
the metals on the primary and secondary drinking water standards lists as well as for
the oxides of five major ash components. Although, the results from these analyses
indicate that the ash is heterogeneous, this heterogenicity appears to have been
reduced by the care taken when compositing the ash samples during this study.
Comparison of the results of this study with results reported in the literature (EPA,
October 1987) indicates that the variability of results for each compound appears to
have been reduced in this study.
Metals showing the widest range of concentrations among samples collected at each
facility included barium (ZB); cadmium (ZB); chromium (ZD, ZE); copper (ZA, ZB, ZC);
lead (ZD); manganese (ZA, ZC); mercury (ZE); zinc (ZB, ZD, ZE); and silicon dioxide
(ZA).
Metals showing the widest variation of concentrations between the facilities
included barium (results for Facility ZC are lower than the results for the other
facilities); iron (results for each facility vary from all of the other facilities); lead
(results for Facility ZD are higher than the results for the other facilities); mercury
(results for Facilities ZC and ZD are lower than the results for the other facilities);
R339911 ES-7
-------
TABLE ES-3
ASH DIOXIN RESULTS
Compound
2,3 7,8-TCDD
Other TCDD
2.3,7,8-TCDF
Other TCDF
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
Other PeCDO
1.2.3,7,8-PeCDF
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
Other PeCDF
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
1,2.3.6.7.8-HxCDD
1,2,3,7,8,9-HXCDD
Other HXCDD
1,2,3,4,7,8-HXCDF
1,2,3,6,7,8-HXCDF
1 2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCOF
Other HXCDF
1 2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDO
Other HPCDD
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
1 2 3,4 7,8.9-HpCDF
Other HpCDF
OCPD
OCDF
TOTAL TEs
Toxicity
Equivalency
Factor
(TEF)<»
1
0.01
01
0001
0.5
0005
0 1
0.1
0001
004
0.04
004
0.0004
001
001
0.01
001
00001
0001
0 00001
0001
0001
000001
0
0
Samples (pg/g or ppt)
ZA-AH-003
Value
10
206
263
1.688
33
317
61
46
484
12
17
28
154
74
131
36
5
281
159
140
139
8
51
313
66
Toxicity
Equivalents
10
2.06
26.3
1.69
16.5
1 59
6.1
46
0484
0.48
068
1.12
0.062
074
1 31
036
0.05
0.0281
0159
0.0014
0.139
0.008
0.00051
0
0
745
ZB-AH-001
Value
24
351
617
3,721
118
759
194
162
1,527
40
34
79
342
336
524
127
54
939
319
288
539
48
197
544
243
Toxicity
Equivalents
24
3.51
61 7
3.72
59
3.80
19.4
162
1 53
1 6
1.36
3 16
0.137
336
524
1.27
0.54
00939
0319
0.00288
0539
0.048
000197
0
0
211
ZC-AH-003
Value
16
281
236
1,208
71
1,051
64
56
607
66
90
120
925
218
279
193
70
635
1.849
1.511
653
83
254
6,906
563
Toxicity
Equivalents
16
2.81
236
1 21
355
5 26
64
5.6
0.607
2.64
36
48
0.37
2.18
279
1 93
0.70
00635
1 85
00151
0.653
0083
0 00254
0
0
119
ZD-AH-003
Value
35
541
626
2,633
NO
1,910
151
171
1,736
86
148
194
853
654
660
479
124
1,686
1,555
1,384
1,842
119
384
4,519
893
Toxicity
Equivalents
35
541
62.6
2.63
0
9 55
15 1
17 1
1 74
3.44
592
7 76
0.34
6.54
660
479
1 24
0 169
1 56
00138
1 84
0 119
0 00384
0
0
189
ZE-AH-003
Value
120
176
1,136
35
248
52
43
448
II
11
22
104
95
134
45
20
280
122
294
Toxicity
Equivalents
1 2
17.6
1 14
17.5
1 24
4 3
0448
044
044
020
0
0
63 7
on
00
(') Toxicity Equivalency Factors are EPA's current recommended Factors, (EPA, March 1987).
ND Not detected below 221 pg/g
-------
sodium (results for Facilities ZD andZE are lower than the results for the other
facilities); calcium oxide (the results for Facilities ZA and ZB are higher than the
results for the other facilities); and silicon dioxide (the results for Facility ZC are
higher than the results for the other facilities).
Some additional findings of the ash sampling and analyses are as follows:
• The ashes are alkaline with the pH ranging from 10.36 to 11.85.
• The ashes are rich in chlorides and sulfates. The total soluble solids in the
ashes varied from 6,440 to 65,800 ppm.
• The ashes contained unburnt total organic carbon (TOC) ranging from
4,060 ppm (0.4 percent) to 53,200 ppm (5.32 percent).
The major findings of the leachate sampling and analysis during this study are
summarized in the following paragraphs.
Only four Appendix IX semivolatile compounds were found in the leachates from the
ash disposal facilities. Benzoic acid was found in both leachate samples collected at
one of the five ash disposal facilities. Phenol, 3-methylphenol, and 4-methylpheno!
were found in some of the leachate samples from one of the other facilities. All of
these compounds were detected at very low levels (2-73 ppb).
PCDDs/PCDFs were only found in the leachate from one facility. The homologs
found are the more highly chlorinated homologs. The data obtained during this
study appears to indicate that PCDDs/PCDFs do not readily leach out of the ash in the
ash disposal facilities. The low levels found in the leachates of the one facility
probably originated from the solids found within the leachate samples because
these samples were not filtered nor centrif uged prior to analysis.
None of the leachate samples exceeded the EP Toxicity Maximum Allowable Limits
established for the eight metals in Section 261.24 of 40 CFR 261. In addition, the
data from this study indicate that although the leachates are not used for drinking
purposes, they are close to being acceptable for drinking water use, as far as the
metals are concerned.
R339911 ES-9
-------
Some other findings of the leachate sampling and analyses are as follows:
• Sulfate values ranged from 14.4 mg/L to 5,080 mg/L, while Total Dissolved
Solids (IDS) ranged from 924 mg/L to 41,000 mg/L.
• The field pH values ranged from 5.2 to 7.4.
• Ammonia (4.18-77.4 mg/L) and nitrate (0.01-0.45 mg/L) were present in
almost all leachate samples.
• Total Organic Carbon values ranged from 10.6 to 420 ppm.
The major findings from the analysis of the ash extracts during this study are
summarized as follows:
• Of the five composite samples of the deionized water (SW-924) extracts
analyzed for the Appendix IX semivolatile compounds (one from each
facility), only one sample contained low levels of benzoic acid (0.130 ppm).
• None of the extracts contained PCDDs/PCDFs. These data confirm the
findings of the actual field leachate samples that PCDDs/PCDFs are not
readily leached from the ash.
The data obtained during the metals analyses of the ash extracts indicate that, in
general, the extracts from the EP Toxicity, the TCLP 1, and the TCLP2 extraction
procedures have higher metals content than the extracts from the deionized water
(SW-924), the CO2, and the Simulated Acid Rain (SAR) extraction procedures. The EP
Toxicity Maximum Allowable Limits for lead and cadmium were frequently exceeded
by the extracts from the EP Toxicity, TCLP 1, and TCLP 2 extraction procedures. One
of the extracts from the EP Toxicity extraction procedure also exceeded the EP
Toxicity Maximum Allowable Limit for mercury.
None of the extracts from the deionized water (SW-924), the CO2, and the Simulated
Acid Rain (SAR) extraction procedures exceeded the EP Toxicity Maximum Allowable
Limits. In addition, the majority of the extracts from these three extraction
procedures also met the Primary and Secondary Drinking Water Standards for
metals.
R339911 ES-10
-------
Table ES-4 compares the range of concentrations of the metals analyses of the ash
extracts with the range of concentrations for leachate as reported in the literature
(EPA, October 1987) and the range of concentrations for the leachates as
determined in this study. For the facilities sampled during this study, the data in
Table ES-4 indicate that the extracts from the deionized water (SW-924), the CO2/
and the SAR extraction procedures simulated the concentrations for lead and
cadmium in the field leachates better than the extracts from the other three
extraction procedures.
R339911 ES-11
-------
TABLE ES-4
COMPARISON OF ASH EXTRACT METAL ANALYSES RESULTS
WITH LEACHATE METAL ANALYSES RESULTS
Parameter
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Iron
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Zinc
Samples (ug/L)
EPTOX
Extracts
ND-31
23-455
25-1,200
ND-86
24-5.170
ND-82,000
ND-19.700
250-8.540
ND-203
ND
ND
33,600-
225,000
67-95,600
TCLP1
Extracts
ND
161-1,850
ND-1,150
ND-8.0
5-858
ND-7,220
ND- 10,500
ND-5,170
ND-3.8
NO
ND
1,380,000-
1,640,000
9.7-79,500
TCLP2
Extracts
ND-60
12-809
ND- 1,560
ND-799
5.4-1,400
ND- 162,000
ND-26,400
3.8-7,370
ND-4.6
ND
ND
38,700-
228,000
26-164,000
CO2 Extracts
ND-53
126-530
ND-354
ND-9.8
8.8-620
ND-304
ND-504
ND-2,390
ND-155
ND
ND-16
24,800-
168,000
5-127,000
DIH2O
Extracts
ND-45
139-3,050
ND-7.6
ND-16
12-534
ND-115
ND-3,410
ND-20
ND-096
ND
ND
24,100-
209,000
5.4-1,340
SAR Extracts
ND
129-3,960
ND-6.0
ND-10
85-610
ND-97
ND-3,940
ND-64
ND-1.1
ND-23
ND
24,200-
201,000
12-1,290
Leachate
(Literature)O)
5-218
1,000
ND-44
6-1,530
22-24,000
168-
121,000
12-2,920
103-4,570
1-8
2.5-37
70
200,000-
4,000,000
ND-3,300
Leachate
(CORRE)
ND-400
ND-9,220
ND-4
ND-32
ND-12
108-10,500
ND-54
310-18,500
ND
ND-340
ND
188,000-
3,800,000
5 2-370
*/»
NJ
-------
TABLE ES-4
COMPARISON OF ASH EXTRACT METAL ANALYSES RESULTS
WITH LEACHATE METAL ANALYSES RESULTS
PAGE TWO
Parameter
Aluminum Oxide*
Calcium Oxide*
Magnesium Oxide*
Potassium
Monoxide*
Silicon Dioxide*
EPTOX
Extracts
ND-1 50,000
592,000-
4,810.000
27,300-
130,000
10.100-
189,000
5,09098,700
TCLP1
Extracts
ND-62,800
666,000-
2,750,000
55-375,000
14,600-
210,000
379-51,700
Samples (pg/L)
TCLP2
Extracts
ND-1 52,000
692,000-
3,640,000
623-137,000
15,100-
1,110,00
820-143,000
CO2 Extracts
ND-90,700
398,000-
1,920,000
207-59,300
12,300-
155,000
418-71,800
DIH2O
Extracts
ND-203,000
141,000-
1,740,000
21 379
1 3, 1 00-
189,000
402-3,990
SAR Extracts
ND-1 18,000
142,000-
1,800,000
12-430
14,500-
181,000
364-3,770
Leachate
(Literature)U)
NR
21,000
NR
21,500
NR
Leachate
(CORRE)
ND-920
64,600-
8,390,000
14,800-
367,000
79,700-
1,620,000
470-15,300
ftl
ND Not Detected
NR Not Reported in the literature.
<') EPA, October 1987.
* The ash extracts were analyzed as ions for these compounds and reported as oxides. The leachates were analyzed and are reported as ions for
these compounds.
-------
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This report, "Characterization of Municipal Waste Combustion Ash, Ash Extracts and
Leachates," has been prepared for the United States Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) and the Coalition on Resource Recovery and the Environment
(CORRE) in response to Work Assignment Number 90 under EPA Contract
Number 68-01-7310.
This study was initiated by Ms. Gerry Dorian of EPA and Dr. Walter Shaub of CORRE.
1.1 BACKGROUND
Prior to the passage of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 (RCRA),
disposal of municipal solid waste (MSW) and the ash from municipal waste
combustion (MWC) facilities was not regulated by EPA but was regulated primarily
by individual states and local municipalities. With the passage of RCRA, the disposal
of MSW has been regulated under Subtitle D of RCRA. The regulations in Subtitle D
stipulate that any municipal waste disposal facility that does not meet the criteria
promulgated under RCRA must be closed. Because of the need to meet these
criteria, there has been a steady decrease in the number of sites available for MSW
disposal.
Incineration of municipal solid waste (MSW) has become an important waste
disposal alternative because it provides an effective means of reducing the volume
of MSW as well as an important source of energy recovery. Currently 10 percent of
MSW is incinerated. Based on the number of municipal waste combustion (MWC)
facilities being planned across the country, this percentage is expected to increase to
roughly 16-25 percent by the year 2000.
As incineration has grown in popularity, so has concern over the management of
increasing volumes of ash. Ashes from MWC facilities have, on occasion, exhibited a
hazardous waste characteristic as determined by the EP Toxicity Test. The debate
regarding the regulatory status of ash and the representativeness and validity of the
EP test continues. Congress is considering several legislative initiatives that would
R339911 1-1
-------
give EPA clear authority to develop special management standards for ash under
Subtitle D of RCRA.
In the meantime, EPA and CORRE have cosponsored this study conducted by NUS to
enhance the data base on the characteristics of MWC ashes, laboratory extracts of
MWC ashes, and leachates from MWC ash disposal facilities.
The Coalition on Resource Recovery and the Environment (CORRE) was established
to provide credible information about resource recovery and associated
environmental issues to the public and to public officials. In providing information,
CORRE takes no position as to the appropriateness of one technology compared to
others. CORRE recognizes that successful waste management is an integrated
utilization of many technologies which taken as a whole, are best selected by an
informed public and informed public officials.
1.2 SCOPE OF WORK
NUS collected samples of fresh ash from five mass-burn MWC facilities. All of the ash
samples collected were combined fly ash and bottom ash samples.
The facilities sampled were selected by CORRE to meet the following criteria:
• The facilities were to be state-of-the-art facilities equipped with a variety of
pollution control equipment.
• The facilities were to be located in different regions of the United States.
• The companion ash disposal facilities were to be equipped with leachate
collection systems or some means of collecting leachate samples.
The identities of the facilities are being held in confidence.
These samples were submitted to laboratories for chemical analyses. In addition,
these ash samples were subjected to six different laboratory extraction procedures
and the extracts were then analyzed. NUS also collected leachate samples from the
five MWC ash disposal facilities used by the MWC facilities. The leachate samples
R339911 1-2
-------
were also sent to a laboratory for analysis. The analyses performed on each type of
sample are outlined in Table 1-1.
Collection of the ash and leachate samples generally followed the Work Plan
prepared for this project (NUS, December 1988). A copy of this Work Plan is included
in Appendix A. Five composite ash samples were collected from each of the five
MWC facilities. The ash samples were collected each day over 5 days (Monday-
Friday) of facility operation. Starting times for sample collection were different each
day so that a wide range of time could be covered. Ash grab samples were collected
at a fixed point each hour for 8 hours. These 8 grab samples were placed in a
5-gallon container for compositing into each day's 8-hour composite sample.
Originally, the ash samples were to be collected using the method outlined in
ASTM D234-86 Standard Method for Collection of a Gross Sample of Coal,
Condition B, full-stream cut. However, because of the configuration of the ash
handling equipment at each facility, minor modifications to this sampling method
were needed to collect the most representative samples from each facility. A
description of how the samples were collected at each facility is presented in the
appropriate Facility Description (Sections 2.0 through 6.0).
Prior to analysis, the samples were prepared in the laboratory by implementing the
following procedures:
• Each composite sample was passed over a 2-inch screen. Material passing
the 2-inch screen was set aside. Material larger than 2 inches was subjected
to repeated blows with a 5-pound sledge hammer dropped from a height of
1 foot. If a piece did not break after being subjected to three blows of the
hammer, it was weighed, the weight recorded, and the piece was discarded.
Material that broke was then reduced in size to pass the 2-inch screen and
recombined with the original material that was smaller than 2 inches.
• Each composite sample was dried at 105°C and crushed to pass a 3/8-inch
screen and riffled or coned and quartered to obtain a 1,000 gram sample.
The sample was then properly labeled and stored in a clean, dry, cool,
secure area. For further details, see ASTM Standard D346.
R339911 1-3
-------
TABLE 1-1
SAMPLE ANALYSES
Matrix
Ash
Leachates
Ash Extracts
Preparation
Screened, Crushed,
Dried, Crushed, Riffled,
or Coned and Quartered
Laboratory filtered and
addedHNO3topH<2
Laboratory added
H2SO4topH<2
(added to ZA samples
infield)
Analyses
MetalsO)
Conventional2'
Appendix IX - Semivolatiles
PCDDs/PCDFs
PCBs
Metals<3>
TOC; NH3-N
Alkalinity as CaC03
TDS; NO3-N; S04; PO4
Cl; Kjeldahl Nitrogen
(ZA samples only)
Appendix IX - Semivolatiles
PCDDs/PCDFs
PCBs
MetalsW
Conventional5)
Appendix IX - Semivolatiles
PCDDs/PCDFs
PCBs - Deiomzed water
extract - Facilities ZA and ZE
Comments
Only 1 sample/facility
Only 1 sample/facility
Only 1 sample from
2 different facilities
Only 1 sample from
2 different facilities
Only on 1 composite ash
extract from each facility
Only on 1 composite ash
extract from each facility
Only on 1 composite ash
extract from each of
2 facilities
(D Metals: As, Ba, Cd, Cr, Pb, Hg,Se, Ag, Na, Cu, Fe, Mn, andZn. Oxides of AI,Si, Ca, Mg, K.
(2) Conventionals: TOC, total soluble salts, NH3-N, NO3-N, SO4, P04, C03/ Cl, moisture content,
and pH.
0) Metals: Soluble forms of Al, As, Ba, Cd, Ca, Cr, Cu, Fe, Pb, Mg, Mn, Hg, Ni, K, Se, Si, Ag, Na,
Zn (Nickel analyzed only on samples from facility ZA).
W Metals: Al, As, Ba, Cd, Ca, Cr, Cu, Fe, Pb, Mg, Mn, Hg, K, Se, Si, Ag, Na, Zn.
R339911
1-4
-------
TABLE 1-1
SAMPLE ANALYSES
PAGE TWO
<5> Conventionals:
Facility ZA: NO3-N, PO4, Cl, SO4, TDS, TOC, NH3-N, Alkalinity on all extracts.
Facility ZB: NO3-N, P04, Cl, SO4 - TCLP 1; TCLP 2; EPTOX; and CO2 extracts.
NO3-N, PO4, Cl, SO4, TDS, TOC, NH3-N, Alkalinity - Deionized Water extract.
PO4, TOC - SAR extract.
Facilities ZC,ZD,ZE:
N03, PO4, Cl, S04, NH3-N - TCLP 1; TCLP 2; EPTOX; and C02 extracts.
NO3, PO4, Cl, S04, TDS, TOC, NH3-N, Alkalinity - Deionized Water extract.
PO4l TOC, NH3-N - SAR extract.
Metals and Appendix IX semi-volatile compounds were analyzed in strict adherence to the EPA third
edition of SW-846.
The conventional parameters were analyzed according to the applicable methods described in the
"Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastewaters," EPA-600/2-79-020, March 1983. Where
necessary, a Dl extraction was done on the ash, except for NH3-N where a 2M KCI solution was used.
PCBs, PCDDs, and PCDFs were analyzed in the homolog form according to the procedures described in
Appendix B of the December 1988 Work Plan. In addition, for the PCDDs and PCDFs the
concentrations of the individual 2, 3, 7, 8 isomers were determined for each homolog.
R339911 1-5
-------
The ash samples were analyzed as outlined in Table 1-1. In addition, a portion of the
prepared samples were subjected to the following six laboratory extraction
procedures:
• Acid Number 1 (EP-TOX).
• Acid Number 2 (TCLP Fluid No. 1).
• Acid Number 3 (TCLP Fluid No. 2).
• Deionized Water (Method SW-924), also known as the Monofill Waste
Extraction Procedure (MWEP).
• CO2 saturated deionized water.
• Simulated acid rain.
These extraction procedures have been used separately by a variety of researchers on
MWC ashes but never have all six procedures been used on the same MWC asHes
This study was designed to compare the analytical results of the extracts from a
procedures with each other and with leachate collected from the ash disposal
facilities used by the MWC facilities.
The laboratory adhered to the appropriate Federal Register leaching requirements
for the first three methods. The extraction solutions and the extraction procedures
used for the CC>2 saturated deionized water and the simulated acid rain are given in
Appendix A of the Work Plan (NUS, December 1988). The SW-924 method is
described in Vol. I "Characterization of MWC Ashes and Leachates from Landfills,
Monofills, and Co-Disposal Sites," EPA,October 1987. The extracts from the ash
were analyzed as outlined in Table 1-1.
Leachate samples were collected from the five facilities to which the individual MWC
facilities sent ashes for disposal. At two of the ash disposal facilities, two grab
samples were collected from leachate collection sumps. At another ash disposal
facility, one grab sample was collected from a valve on the leachate collection line.
At the fourth ash disposal facility, two grab samples were collected from one shallow
water quality lysimeter, and a third grab sample was collected from a second shallow
water quality lysimeter. Seven leachate samples were collected from the fifth ash
disposal facility: three in February 1988, two in November 1988, and two in
June 1989. All seven samples were grab samples collected from the same leachate
collection manhole. The leachates collected from this fifth facility were collected
and analyzed by NUS under a separate contract to EPA. The results of this study
R339911 1-6
-------
were reported in detail in a separate report (EPA, August 1989). Since results of that
study are very pertinent to this study, the results are repeated in the present report.
The leachate samples were shipped to the laboratories for the analyses listed in
Table 1-1. Because of difficulties in shipping or obtaining preservatives, the
leachates samples collected during this study were not preserved in the field, but
were packed in ice and shipped immediately to the laboratory. The laboratories
were instructed to immediately add the required preservatives in the laboratory
after filtering, as applicable. Since the laboratories preserved the samples within
48 hours of sample collection, the samples were not adversely affected.
All sampling and analytical procedures used in this project followed stringent
Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) requirements as outlined in a Quality
Assurance Project Plan prepared for EPA by NUS and approved by EPA's QA Officer in
February 1988 (NUS, February 1988).
Summaries of the results of the analyses of the samples from each MWC Facility are
presented in Sections 2.0 through 6.0. An overall summary is presented in
Section 7.0. The tables in these sections are presented at the end of each section.
A detailed listing of the positive results, as reported by the laboratories, is presented
in a data base which is included in this report as Appendix B (ash), Appendix C
(leachate), and Appendix D (ash extracts). When the laboratories did not report a
positive value for a compound (i.e. the compound was not present above laboratory
detection limits), the compound was reported as not detected (ND) in the tables in
the text. The laboratory detection limits are the method detection limits for each
specific method, unless interferences were encountered during the analysis. When
interferences occurred, the laboratory adjusted the method detection limits by an
appropriate dilution factor. The analytical methods used in this study were selected
so that the method detection limits were well below present levels of human,
environment or regulatory concerns.
The EPA publication "Interim Procedures for Estimating Risk Associated with
Exposures to Mixtures of Chlorinated Dibenzo-p-Dioxins and -Dibenzofurans (CDDs
and CDFs)" was used to evaluate the Dioxin data. These procedures use Toxicity
Equivalency Factors (TEFs) to express the concentrations of the different isomers and
homologs as an equivalent amount of 2,3,7,8-Tetrachloro Dibenzo-p-Dioxin
R339911 1-7
-------
(2,3,7,8-TCDD). The Toxicity Equivalents, as calculated by using the TEFs, are then
totaled and compared to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) recommended upper
level of 2,3,7,8-TCDD Toxicity Equivalency of 1 part per billion in residential soil
(Kimbrough, 1984).
R339911 1-8
-------
2.0 FACILITY ZA FINDINGS
2.1
FACILITY ZA DESCRIPTION
Facility ZA consists of two mass-burn, water-wall boilers. Refuse is charged into the
boilers by overhead cranes, moves inside the boilers on_grates, and is discharged into
ash quench reactors on the bottom of the boilers. A lime slurry is added to the flue
gas where it is mixed with the fly ash. This mixture is then collected in baghouses
and mixed in with the bottom ash for disposal. The steam generated at the facility is
used to produce electricity, which is sold to a local utility. The following details
provide operational information for this facility.
Startup Date:
Refuse Feed Rate:
Operating Temperature:
Residence Time:
Backup Fuel:
Air Temperature into Furnace:
Air Feed Rate:
Refuse Feed Method:
Trash Accepted:
May 1986.
275 tons/day/boiler.
1,800° - 2,000° F at the stoker.
Approximately 1-1/2 hours in the boiler where
the grates can be slowed to allow wet loads
more time to dry out; 1-1/2 hours from ash
discharge to ash pile.
Natural gas - is used if operating temperature
drops below 1,500°F. Has only been used at
startups and shutdowns.
Underfireair-250°F;
Overfi re air-ambient temperature.
Underfire air - varies, normally between
70,000-90,000 lbs./hour.
Overfi re air-40,000 Ibs./hour.
Old and new refuse is mixed with an overhead
crane. Mixed refuse is loaded into boilers with
the overhead crane.
Residential, commercial, industrial waste
generated in local community. Restrictions
are listed in Table 2-1. Medical waste is being
accepted. No sewage sludge is accepted. No
R339911
2-1
-------
known waste oil program in the state. Some
waste oil comes into the facility.
Normal Moisture Content of Ash: 20 - 30%.
(As measured by the facility)
Source of Ash Quench Water: Ash quench water consists of water from floor
drains and some rain water.
Electricity Generated: 13.1 Megawatts/hour.
Electricity Used by the Facility: 1.7 Megawatts/hour.
Ash Handling Equipment
A lime slurry is injected into the flue gas just ir de the quench reactor to neutralize
acid gases formed in the boiler. The flue gas then passes through the baghouses,
where the fly ash-lime mixture is removed from the flue gases. This mixture is
transported back to the ash dischargers on the bottom of each boiler, where it is
mixed with the bottom ash.
The fly ash is mixed with the bottom ash in the ash discharger. From there, the ash
mixture is discharged onto a large shaker conveyor, travels to a grizzly where large
items are removed, is discharged onto a small shaker conveyor, and then is
discharged onto an inclined conveyor belt. The ferrous material is removed at the
top of the conveyor by a rotating electromagnet. The ash falls from the inclined
conveyor belt onto the ash pile. The ash is loaded onto trucks for transportation to
the ash fill. After passing through a trommel, where small particles of ash clinging to
the metal are removed, the ferrous material is trucked to a steel manufacturer.
The ash samples at this facility were collected as the ash came off the inclined belt.
The ash had a tendency to segregate itself at the top of the inclined belt, with the
larger particles coming directly off the belt and the finer, wetter particles sticking to
the belt. These fine, wet particles started back down the underside of the belt and
were scraped off the belt about 1 foot below the top of the conveyor. After the
ferrous material was removed, the samples were collected so that half of each hourly
grab sample consisted of the larger particles and half of the sample consisted of the
finer particles.
R339911 2-2
-------
2.2 CHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF ASH
Table 2-2 presents the results of the semivolatile analysis of the ash samples from
Facility ZA. The data presented in the table indicate that three phthalates were
detected in sample ZA-AH-003, the only sample from this facility analyzed for the
Appendix IX semivolatiles. The di-n-butyl phthalate appears to be the result of
laboratory contamination. The other compounds indicate the presence of plastic
material in the ash. This same sample also contained 107ng/g (parts per billion
(ppb)) of dichlorobiphenyl (PCB). This was the only PCB congener detected in this
sample.
Table 2-3 presents the results of the polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin and
polychlorinated dibenzofuran (PCDD/PCDF) analyses of sample ZA-AH-003. Toxicity
equivalency values were calculated according to EPA's methodology (EPA,
March 1987) and are also presented in this table. The data in this table indicate that
the PCDDs/PCDFs levels found in the ash are substantially below the Centers for
Disease Control (CDC) recommended upper level of 2,3,7,8-TCDD toxicity
equivalency of 1 part per billion in residential soil (Kimbrough, 1984).
The results of the metals analyses for the ash from this facility are presented in
Table 2-4. The data presented in this table indicate that, except for copper,
manganese, and silicon dioxide, the results were fairly constant during the week of
sampling.
The results for the conventional analyses are presented in Table 2-5. The data in this
table indicate that the results were also fairly constant during the week, except for
TOC, and ammonia.
2.3 CHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF LEACHATES
The MSW facility unit accepting ash from MWC Facility ZA is lined and is used
exclusively for the disposal of ash from Facility ZA. The leachate from the ash
disposal facility for MWC Facility ZA was not sampled at the same time that the ash
was sampled. However, NUS collected samples of the leachate in February and
November 1988 and in June 1989 under a separate contract with EPA. The samples
are grab samples collected from the same leachate collection manhole. The
manhole was sampled, accumulated water was removed, and the manhole was
R339911 2-3
-------
allowed to refill with leachate that had been stored in the ash fill. The manhole was
then resampled. The results of the 1988 sampling events were reported in detail
previously (EPA, August 1989) and are summarized here, together with the results of
the 1989 sampling event.
The results for the semivolatile analysis of these samples are presented in Table 2-6.
As shown in this table, phenol was detected on two different occasions, whereas
3-methylphenol and 4-methylphenol were each detected once.
The results for the metals analysis of the leachate samples are shown in Table 2-7.
None of the metals detected exceeded the EPToxicity Maximum Allowable Limit.
Although the leachates are not required to meet Drinking Water Standards, a
comparison of the leachate results with the Primary and Secondary Drinking Water
Standards established under the Safe Drinking Water Act (EPA: BNA, June 1989 and
EPA: BNA, October 1988) was made. This comparison indicates that the majority of
the metals results met these standards in the leachates.
Table 2-8 presents the results of the conventional analyses of the leachate samples.
TDS values ranged from 13,700 mg/L to 41,000 mg/L, and the pH values ranged
from 6.7 to 7.4. Chloride, TDS, and Sulfate exceeded their Secondary Drinking Water
Standards in all of the leachate samples.
The results of the dioxin analysis of the leachate samples are presented in Table 2-9.
This table shows that only very small amounts of the more highly chlorinated
homologs (hepta-CDD, octa-CDD, and hepta-CDF) were found in the leachate
samples.
No PCBs were detected in ZA-LE-006, the only leachate sample analyzed for PCBs.
2.4 CHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF ASH EXTRACTS
No PCDDs/PCDFs or PCBs were detected in the composite sample from the Deionized
Water Extracts of the ash from Facility ZA.
Table 2-10 presents the results of the Appendix IX semivolatile analysis of the
composite sample from the Deionized Water Extracts (SW-924) of the ash from MWC
Facility ZA. Benzoic acid (130 ppb) was the only Appendix IX semivolatile compound
R339911 2-4
-------
found in this composite sample. For comparison, this table also presents the range
of results of the Appendix IX semivolatile analyses of the actual leachate samples
from the ashfill serving this facility. The leachate from the ashfill contained very low
levels of phenol (up to 32 ppb); 3-methylphenol (up to 6 ppb); and 4-methylphenol
(up to 6 ppb).
Table 2-11 presents the range of results of the metals analyses of ash extracts from
MWC Facility ZA and the range of results for leachate samples from the ashfill
serving this facility. For comparison, this table also lists the EPToxicity Maximum
Allowable Limits, and the Primary and Secondary Drinking Water Standards
established under the Safe Drinking Water Act (EPA: BNA, June 1989 and EPA: BNA,
October 1988).
The results presented in Table2-11 indicate that the extracts from the EPToxicity
Extraction technique generally contain higher concentrations of metals than the
extracts produced by the other extraction techniques. The data in this table also
indicate that the extracts from the deionized water extraction technique (SW-924)
generally contain lower concentrations of metals than the extracts produced by the
other extraction techniques.
For this facility, the extracts from the EPtoxicity extraction technique are the only
ones that exceeded the EPToxicity Maximum Allowable Limits established in
Section 261.24of 40CFR261 for cadmium, lead, and mercury.
Although the ash extracts would not be required to meet Drinking Water Standards,
a comparison of the ash extract results with the Drinking Water Standards was
made. This comparison indicates that the majority of the metals results met these
standards.
Table 2-12 presents the range of results of the conventional analyses of the ash
extracts from MWC Facility ZA and the range of results of the leachate samples from
the ashfill serving this facility. For comparison, this table also lists the Primary
Drinking Water Standards for nitrate, as well as the Secondary Drinking Water
Standards for chloride, sulfate, and Total Dissolved Solids (TDS). The data in this
table indicate that the results for the conventional compounds obtained from the
deionized water extraction technique (SW-924) are generally lower than the results
from the other extraction techniques.
R339911 2-5
-------
TABLE 2-1
RESTRICTED WASTES
FACILITY ZA
ALL COVERED VEHICLES MUST LIFT OR ROLL BACK
TARP FOR INSPECTION AT SCALE PRIOR TO ENTERING
FACILITY OR TIP OUT ON FLOOR AS DIRECTED
PROHIBITED WASTES
NO Wallboard/Drywall
Nonburnable Construction Materials
Sealed Drums or Containers
Tar/Asphalt
Tires
Bales
Infectious Materials
Major Auto Parts (Batteries, Fenders, etc.)
Other Unacceptable Items
NO HAZARDOUS WASTE PER STATE / FEDERAL
REGULATIONS
TRUCKS WITH UNACCEPTABLE LOADS SHALL BE:
• DENIED ENTRY OR
• RELOADED AND REDIRECTED TO LANDFILL
ALL VEHICLES
SUBJECT TO INSPECTION
R339911 2-6
-------
TABLE 2-2
ASH SEMIVOLATILE RESULTS • SAMPLE ZA-AH-003
FACILITY ZA
Parameter
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Ash Sample Result
(vg/kg)
250,000
2.000T
430JB
Indicates approximate value because contaminants were
detected at levels below Method Detection Limits, but above the
instrument detection limits.
Laboratory identified compound as not being detected
substantially above the level reported in laboratory blanks.
Laboratory may be the source of the contamination.
The mass spectrum does not meet EPA CLP criteria for
confirmation, but compound presence is strongly suspected.
R339911
2-7
-------
TABLE 2-3
ASH DIOXIN RESULTS - SAMPLE ZA-AH-003
FACILITY ZA
PCDD/PCDF Homolog
2,3,7,8-TCDD
Other TCDD
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
Other PeCDD
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
1,2,3,6,7,8-HXCDD
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD
Other HXCDD
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
Other HpCDO
OCDD
2,3,7,8-TCDF
Other TCDF
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
Other PeCDF
1,2,3,4,7,8-HXCDF
1,2,3,6,7,8-HXCDF
1,2,3,7,8,9-HXCDF
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
Other HXCDF
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
Other HpCDF
OCDF
Total Toxicity Equivalent
Ash Sample Result
pg/g
(Ppt)
10
206
33
317
12
17
28
154
159
140
313
263
1,688
61
46
484
74
131
36
5
281
139
8
51
66
Toxicity
Equivalency
FactorO)
1.0
0.01
0.5
0.005
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.0004
0.001
0.00001
0
0.1
0.001
0.1
0.1
0.001
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.0001
0.001
0.001
0.00001
0
Toxicity
Equivalent
(ppt)
10
2.06
16.5
1.59
0.48
0.68
1.12
0.062
0.159
0.0014
0
26.3
1.69
6.1
4.6
0.484
0.74
1.31
0.36
0.05
0.0281
0.139
0.008
0.00051
0
74. 5 ppt
0) Toxicity Equivalency Factors are EPA's current recommended factors
(EPA, March 1987).
R339911
2-8
-------
METALS
TABLE 2-4
ASH METALS ANALYSES
FACILITY ZA
Parameter
Samples
ZA-AH-001
ZA-AH-002
ZA-AH-003
ZA-AH-004
ZA-AH-005
(mg/kg)
(mg/kg)
(mg/kg)
(mg/kg)
(mg/kg)
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Iron
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Zinc
50
529
43
93
1,420
63,300
1,580
1,020
10.4
ND
4.8
10,200
6,900
49
480
41
90
7,360
57,400
1,180
835
22.9
ND
5.0
9,970
4,310
51
554
56
79
1,160
48,600
1,820
849
25.1
ND
8.7
1 1 ,000
6,600
45
523
32
64
994
44,100
1,480
1,360
16.9
ND
4.1
9,350
4,740
37
436
41
55
946
46,000
1,660
587
18.0
ND
7.9
10,400
4,540
METAL OXIDES
Aluminum Oxide
Calcium Oxide
Magnesium Oxide
Potassium Monoxide
Silicon Dioxide
8.52
20.5
1.38
1.2
22.4
9.37
20.3
1.33
1.1
22.2
9.0
22.2
1.31
1.24
21.9
9.23
15.1
1.5
1.2
27.3
9.85
18.4
1.21
1.15
43.8
ND Not detected.
R339911
2-9
-------
TABLE 2-5
ASH CONVENTIONAL ANALYSES
FACILITY ZA
Parameter
PH
Moisture Content*
TOC
Total Soluble Solids
Ammonia
Nitrate
Ortho Phosphate
Total Alkalinity
Chloride
Sulfate
Units
S.U.
%
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
Samples
ZA-AH-001
11.83
0.9
18,100
52,400
4.47
2.86
ND
7,540
18,300
5,020
ZA-AH-002
11.85
1.9
22,000
49,800
2.89
2.29
ND
8,000
17,800
4,800
ZA-AH-003
11.79
1.6
11,400
50,400
5.98
2.22
ND
7,730
23,700
6,100
ZA-AH-004
11.80
1.1
23,400
46,500
11.5
2.54
ND
8,100
19,100
4,620
ZA-AH-005
11.68
1.7
35,600
48,400
5.98
4.23
ND
8,050
16,300
3,770
ND Not detected.
* Determined after samples were prepared.
R339911
2-10
-------
TABLE 2-6
LEACHATE SEMIVOLATILE ANALYSES
FACILITY ZA
Parameter
Phenol
3-Methyl phenol
4-Methyl phenol
Samples (in pg/L)
ZA-LE-001
ND
NO
ND
2A-LE-002
19
ND
ND
ZA-LE-003
32
6J
6J
2A-LE-004
ND
ND
ND
2A-LE-005
ND
ND
ND
ZA-LE-006
4J
ND
ND
ZA-LE-007
2J
ND
ND
ND Not Detected.
j Indicates approximate value because contaminants were detected at levels below detection limits, but above the instrument
detection limits.
Note: All Samples were collected from Manhole (1):
ZA-LE-001 was standing liquid sampled on February 11,1988.
ZA-LE-002 was sampled on February 11, 1988 immediately after standing liquid was removed.
ZA-LE-003 was sampled on February 11,1988 1 hour after standing liquid was removed.
ZA-LE-004 was sampled on November 29,1988 immediately after standing liquid was removed.
ZA-LE-005 was sampled on November 29,1988 1-1/2 hours after manhole refilled
ZA-LE-006 was sampled on June 13, 1989 1 hour after standing liquid was removed.
ZA-LE-007 was sampled on June 13, 1989 2-1/2 hours after collecting ZA-LE-006.
-------
TABLE 2-7
LEACHATE METALS ANALYSES
FACILITY ZA
Parameter
Arsenic
Calcium
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silicon
Silver
Sodium
Zinc
Samples (in pg/L)
ZA-LE-001
NA
160
NA
ND
NA
8
NO
3.400
11
NA
4,600
ND
ND
NA
120
NA
ND
NA
370
ZA-LE-002
NA
130
NA
17
NA
32
ND
650
24
NA
310
ND
ND
NA
120
NA
ND
NA
250
ZA-LE-003
NA
140
NA
1 1
NA
18
ND
120
25
NA
370
ND
ND
NA
130
NA
ND
NA
190
ZA-LE-004
NA
260
NA
ND
NA
16
ND
2,400
54
NA
1,230
ND
ND
NA
260
NA
ND
NA
130
ZA LE-005
NA
400
NA
ND
NA
22
ND
1,600
42
NA
800
ND
ND
NA
340
NA
ND
NA
60
ZA-LE-006
920
47
ND
1 3
3,270,000
ND
ND
770
18
51,000
1,000
ND
ND
525,000
24
2,100
ND
3,000,000
250
ZA-LE-007
700
59
ND
1 4
5.360,000
ND
ND
790
8
70,000
2.600
ND
ND
516,000
33
5,700
ND
3,800,000
250
Standards/Criteria (in vgll)
EP Toxicity
Maximum
Allowable Limit
SNA
5,000
100,000
1.000
SNA
5.000
SNA
SNA
5,000
SNA
SNA
200
SNA
SNA
1,000
SNA
5.000
SNA
SNA
Safe Drinking
Water Acl(a)
MCLs
SNA
50
1.000
10
SNA
50
SNA
SNA
50
SNA
SNA
SNA
10
SNA
50
SNA
SNA
Safe Drinking
Water ActlW
SMCLs
SNA
SNA
SNA
1,000
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
5,000
NJ
NJ
Blank space indicates analysis is below detection limits
NA Not analyzed due to di f ferences in scope of work
ND Not Detected
SNA Standard Not Available
(a) Primary Drinking Water Standards
(b) Secondary Drinking Waler Standards
Note. All Samples were collected from Manhole (1).
ZA-LE-001 was standing liquid sampled on February 11. 1988 •
/A 11 002 wos sampled on February I I, 1988 immediately after standing liquid was removed
cA-Lk 001 was sampled on feuiuufy 11. I9B8 I hour after standing liquid was removed
/A U 004 \jv.is sampled on November
-------
TABLE 2-8
LEACHATE CONVENTIONAL ANALYSES
FACILITY ZA
Parameter
Ammonia - Distilled
(asN)
Organic Carbon
Chloride
Nitrogen, Kjeldahl
Sulfate(SO4)
PH
Solids, Dissolved
@!80°C
Specific Conductance
@25*C
Total Alkalinity
Pht Alkalinity
Carbonate Alkalinity
Nitrate (as N)
Phosphorus
Samples
ZA-LE-001
3Smg/L
53 mg/L
22,000 mg/L
43 mg/L
1.000 mg/L
67
4 1,000 mg/L
46,000 Mmhos/cm
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
ZALE-002
23 mg/L
77 mg/L
17,000 mg/L
34 mg/L
1,500 mg/L
69
29,000 mg/L
33,000 pmhos/cm
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
ZA-LE-003
26 mg/L
110 mg/L
18,000 mg/L
38 mg/L
1.500 mg/L
72
32.000 mg/L
38,000 Mmhos/cm
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
ZA-LE-004
5.5 mg/L
17 mg/L
7, 700 mg/L
NA
1,000 mg/L
74
13, 700 mg/L
NA
68 mg/L
NA
NA
02 mg/L
0 18 mg/L
ZA-LE-005
53 mg/L
23 mg/L
8,300 mg/L
NA
700 mg/L
67
16,300 mg/L
NA
44 mg/L
NA
NA
0.2 mg/L
0 19 mg/L
ZA-LE-006
20 mg/L
25 mg/L
14,000 mg/L
NA
780 mg/L
72
24,700 mg/L
> 10,000 Mmhos/cm
(field)
81 mg/L
0
0
<001 mg/L
1.1 mg/L
ZA-LE 007
28 mg/L
420 mg/L
19.000 mg/L
NA
620 mg/L
7 1
3 1.300 mg/L
> 10,000 Mmhos/cm
(field)
120 mg/L
0
0
<001 mg/L
1 2 mg/L
Standards/
Criteria
Primary and
Secondary
Drinking Water
Quality
Standards
SNA
SNA
250 mg/L(W
SNA
250 mg/L(W
SNA
500 mg/L(W
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
lOmg/LW
SNA
NA Not analyzed due to differences in scope of work.
SNA Standard Not Available
(a) Primary Drinking Water Standards
(b) Secondary Drinking Water Standards
Note: All Samples were collected from Manhole (1):
ZA LE 001 was standing liquid sampled on February 11, 1988
ZA IE 002 was sampled on February 11, 1988 immediately after standing liquid was removed
ZA-LE-003 was sampled on February II, 1988 1 hour after standing liquid was removed
ZA LE 004 was sampled on November 29, 1988 immediately after standing liquid was removed
ZA LE 005 was sampled on November 29, 1988 1 1/2 hours after manhole refilled
ZA-LE-006 was sampled on June 13, 1989 1 hour after standing liquid was removed
ZA-LE-007 was sampled on June 13. 1989 2-1/2 hours after collecting ZA-LE-006
-------
TABLE 2-9
LEACHATE DIOXIN ANALYSES
FACILITY ZA
Parameter
2,3,7,8-TCDD
TCDD-TOT
PeCDD
HXCDD
HPCDD
OCDD
2,3,7,8-TCDF
TCDF-TOT
PeCDF
HXCDF
HPCDF
OCDF
2,3,7,8-TCDDO)
equivalency ppb
Samples (ppb)
ZA-LE-001
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.222
0 107
ND
ND
ND
ND
0076
ND
2x104
ZA-LE-002
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0094
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.00
ZA-LE-003
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0057
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.00
ZA-LE-004
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.048
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.00
ZA-LE-005
ND
ND
ND
ND
0049
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.00
ZA-LE-006
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ZA-LE-007
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND Not Detected.
Note: All Samples were collected from Manhole (1):
ZA-LE-001 was standing liquid sampled on February 11, 1988.
ZA-LE-002 was sampled on February 11,1988 immediately after standing liquid was removed
ZA-LE-003 was sampled on February 11. 1988 1 hour after standing liquid was removed
ZA-LE-004 was sampled on November 29,1988 immediately after standing liquid was removed.
ZA-LE-005 was sampled on November 29,1988 1-1/2 hours after manhole refilled.
ZA-LE-006 was sampled on June 13, 1989 1 hour after standing liquid was removed.
ZA-LE-007 was sampled on June 13, 1989 2-1/2 hours after collecting ZA-LE-006.
0) 2,3,7,8-TCDD Equivalency calculated using Toxicity Equivalency Factors currently recommended BY EPA (EPA, March 1987).
-------
TABLE 2-10
COMPARISON OF ASH EXTRACTS SEMIVOLATILE ANALYSES
WITH LEACHATE SEMIVOLATILE ANALYSES
RANGES OF CONCENTRATIONS
FACILITY ZA
Parameter
Benzole acid
Phenol
3-Methyl phenol
4-Methyl phenol
Samples (yg/L)
Deionized Water Extract
130
ND
NO
ND
Leachate
ND
ND-32
ND-6J
ND-6J
ND Not detected
J indicates approximate value because contaminants were detected at levels
below detection limits, but above the instrument detection limits.
R339911
2-15
-------
•yo
u>
CO
TABLE 2-11
COMPARISON Of ASH EXTRACTS METALS ANALYSES WITH LEACHATE METALS ANALYSES
RANGES OF CONCENTRATIONS
FACILITY ZA
Parameter
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Iron
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Zinc
Aluminum Oxide
Calcium Oxide
Magnesium Oxide
Potassium Monoxide
Silicon Dioxide
Samples (m ng/0
COa Extracts
NO
218-282
63-108
ND-5 1
268620
40-304
ND 40
1,540-2,390
ND-15S
NO
NO- 16
108.000-
152,000
22,700-34,400
179-302
693.000-
699.000
32,000-42,800
114,000-
143,000
36,600-71,800
Dl H;O Extracts
ND
457-557
NO-7,6
68-10
160-534
21-115
1,960-3.410
ND-20
ND
ND
ND
130.000-
174,000
651-1,340
ND 195
684,000-
699,000
50379
134.000-
168.000
616-1.640
EPTOX Extracts
ND-31
177-455
592-1,000
6-72
790-2,620
1421,700
94-1 1.300
2,450-4.030
NO
ND
108,000
150,000
37,800-75,900
ND-29,300
2,330,000-
3,580,000
27,300-
58,900
10,100-
154,000
29,000-98,700
TCLP 1 Extracts
ND
505-651
ND
ND
104-301
6646
ND-996
ND 4 1
ND
ND
1,450.000-
1,520,000
42-377
223-3,100
669.000-
2,380,000
74-400
'4J.OOO-
210,000
2,790-5.520
TCLP 2 Extracts
ND
449-809
ND-695
ND-20
76213
20-75,400
ND-174
3 8-5.440
ND
ND
71.700-
228,000
31-78,500
180-1,850
692,000-
3,540.000
623-66.900
63,300-
224.000
1,360-81,100
SAR Extracts
ND
464-561
ND
ND-10
128-610
ND
1,740-3,940
ND 28
ND-23
ND
108.000-
160,000
690-1,290
ND-166
1,100,000-
1,800,000
12 18
118,000-
168,000
364 877
LeachateW
•••••••••••IM
47400
ND
ND-1 7
ND 32
ND
120-3,400
8-54
310-4,600
24-340
ND
3,000,000-
3,800,000
60-370
700-920
3,270,000-
5,360,000
51,000-
70,000
516,000-
525.000
2,100-5,700
EPToxicity
Maximum
Allowable
Limit
5,000
100,000
1,000
5,000
SNA
SNA
5.000
1,000
5,000
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
Safe
Drinking
Water Act<")
MCLs
50
50
SNA
SNA
50
10
50
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
Safe
Drinking
Water Act
-------
TABLE 2- 12
COMPARISON OF ASH EXTRACTS CONVENTIONAL ANALYSES WITH LEACHATE CONVENTIONAL ANALYSES
RANGES Of CONCENTRATIONS
FACILITY ZA
Parameter
Ammonia- Distilled
-------
-------
3.0 FACILITY ZB FINDINGS
3.1
FACILITY ZB DESCRIPTION
Facility ZB consists of two mass-burn, water-wall boilers. Refuse is charged into the
boilers by front-end loaders, moves inside the boilers on grates, and is discharged
into an ash quench tank located below the boilers. Dry lime is added to the flue gas
where it is mixed with the fly ash. This mixture is then collected in baghouses and
mixed with the bottom ash for disposal. The steam generated at the facility is used
to generate electricity, which is sold to a local utility. The following details outline
the operational information for this facility.
Startup Date
Refuse Feed Rate:
Operating Temperature:
Residence Time:
Backup Fuel:
Air Feed Information:
Air Feed Rate:
Grate Information:
Refuse Feed Method:
Early 1987.
75-100 tons/day/boiler.
1,800°F.
Approximately 1/2 to 3/4 hour in the boiler, where
the grates can be slowed to allow wet loads more
time to dry out; approximately 20 minutes from ash
quench to ash pile.
Propane -- is used during start ups and shut downs.
Underfire air comes directly from the tipping floor
and is not preheated unless trash is very wet.
Overfire air comes from inside the boiler room and
is not preheated except by the heat buildup in the
building.
Primary Air - 10,890 cubic feet/minute
Secondary Air - 5,900 cubic feet/minute
There are four zones on the grates: Drying Zone,
Burn Zone, Burn Down Zone, Cool Down Zone. The
speed of each zone can be maintained separately.
Refuse is dumped on the tipping floor, where new
refuse is mixed with old refuse with a front-end
loader. The front-end loader can only mix waste
near the working face of the pile. If the piles are
large (normal condition), the front-end loader
R339911
3-1
-------
Trash Accepted:
Normal Moisture
Content of Ash:
(As measured by the facility.)
Source of Ash Quench Water:
Electricity Generated:
Electricity Used by Facility:
Ash-Handling Equipment
cannot effectively mix the refuse located on the
bottom of the pile away from the working face.
The front-end loader is also used to load the trash
into the feed hoppers. NUS personnel also observed
several trucks backing right up to the feed hoppers
and dumping the loads directly into the feed
hoppers or right in front of the hoppers. These
loads were fired directly into the boiler without any
mixing.
Residential (80%), commercial, and light industrial
(20%) waste generated in the surrounding
communities. No sewage sludge is accepted.
36-37 percent.
Ash Quench Water consists of water used to rinse
the ash bins; water draining from the ash; septic
system discharge; and blowdowns from cooling
tower and boiler.
4.5 Megawatts/hour.
0.6 Megawatts/hour.
The bottom ash is discharged into one of two quench tanks that are equipped with
drag flight conveyors. The ash settles to the bottom of the quench tank and is
moved along by the drag flights. It then travels up an incline and is dumped into ash
bins (roll-off containers).
Dry lime is injected into the flue gas to neutralize any acidic gases. The lime-fly ash
mixture is collected in baghouses and transported back into the main building.
Phosphoric acid and water are mixed with the lime-fly ash mixture. The resulting
mixture is agglomerated and is then added to the bottom ash as the bottom ash
travels up the incline and before it is dumped into the ash bins.
The mixed ash is deposited in the ash bins in two piles. As the first pile reaches the
top of the bin, the ash conveyor is shut down so that the bin can be moved to start
R339911
3-2
-------
the second pile. Once the bins are full, the ash conveyor is again shut down so that
the bins can be switched. The bins are transported daily to the ash disposal facility.
The ash bins are equipped with drains so that some of the free moisture in the ash
can drain off. When the ash bins are switched, the drains on the full bins are capped,
the outside of the bin is washed off, and the full bin is moved into the yard. Once in
the yard, the ash is leveled off and covered with tarps. The ash conveyor is restarted
when the empty bin is in place and the caps on the drains are removed. This process
can take anywhere from 10 to 30 minutes. The fly ash is continually discharged onto
the incline of the drag conveyor during the changing of the ash bins.
The ash samples at Facility ZB were collected as the ash traveled up the inclined
portion of the drag conveyor, just after the fly ash was mixed with the bottom ash.
Each partial sample was collected from 1, 2, or 3 different flights, depending on the
quantity of ash present on the flights.
3.2 CHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF ASH
Table 3-1 presents the results of the semivolatile analysis of the ash samples from
Facility ZB. The results in this table indicate that bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate was
detected in sample ZB-AH-001, the only sample from this facility analyzed for the
Appendix IX semivolatiles. This compound appears to be the result of laboratory
contamination.
Table 3-2 presents the results of the polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin and
polychlorinated dibenzofuran (PCDD/PCDF) analyses of sample ZB-AH-001. Toxicity
equivalency values were calculated according to EPA's methodology (EPA,
March 1987) and are presented in this table. The data in this table indicate that the
PCDDs/PCDFs levels found in the ash are substantially below the Centers for Disease
Control (CDC) recommended upper level of 2,3,7,8-TCDD toxicity equivalency of
1 part per billion in residential soil (Kimbrough, 1984).
The results of the metals analyses for the ash from this facility are presented in
Table 3-3. The data in this table indicate that, except for barium, cadmium, copper,
and zinc, the results were fairly constant during the week of sampling.
R339911 3-3
-------
The results for the conventional analyses are presented in Table 3-4. The data in this
table indicate that, except for TOC, ammonia, chloride, sulfate, and total alkalinity,
the results were also fairly constant during the week.
3.3 CHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF LEACHATES
The facility used for the disposal of ash from MWC Facility ZB is lined and is used
exclusively for the disposal of ash from Facility ZB.
The leachate sample (ZB-LE-001) from the ash disposal facility for MWC Facility ZB
was a grab sample collected from a valve on the main leachate collection line. A
second sample (ZB-LE-002) was collected from the leak detection system located
underthe primary liner.
No Appendix IX semivolatile compounds or PCDDs/PCDFs were detected in the
leachate sample from the ash disposal facility for MWC Facility ZB, or m the sample
from the leak detection system.
The results for the metals analysis of the leachate sample are shown in Table 3-5.
The data in this table indicate that none of the compounds exceeded the EP Toxicity
Maximum Allowable Limit. Although the leachate is not required to meet Drinking
Water Standards, a comparison of the leachate results with the Primary and
Secondary Drinking Water Standards established under the Safe Drinking Water Act
(EPA: SNA, June 1989 and EPA: BNA, October 1988) was made. This comparison
indicates that the majority of the metals results met these standards in the leachate.
Table 3-6 presents the results of the conventional analyses of the leachate sample
(ZB-LE-001). The TDS value was 40,600 mg/L and the pH of the leachate was 6.5.
The results for the metals analysis of the sample from the leak detection system
(ZB-LE-002) are shown in Table 3-7. The data in this table indicate that none of the
compounds exceeded the EP Toxicity Maximum Allowable Limit. Although this
water is not required to meet Drinking Water Standards, a comparison of the results
with the Primary and Secondary Drinking Water Standards established under the
Safe Drinking Water Act (EPA: BNA, June 1989 and EPA: BNA, October 1988) was
made. This comparison indicates that the results for all metals met these standards
in the sample from the leak detection system.
R339911 3-4
-------
Table 3-8 presents the results of the conventional analyses of the samples from the
leak detection system. The TDS value was 535mg/L and the pH of the sample
was 6.5.
The data in both Tables 3-7 and 3-8 indicate that the liner is intact and no leachate is
entering the leak detection system.
3.4 CHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF ASH EXTRACTS
No Appendix IX semivolatile compounds or PCDDs/PCDFs were detected in the
composite sample from the deionized water extracts (SW-924) of the ash from MWC
Facility ZB.
Table 3-9 presents the range of results of the metals analyses of the ash extracts from
MWC Facility ZB and the results for the leachate sample from the ash fill serving this
facility. For comparison, this table also lists the EP Toxicity Maximum Allowable
Limits, and the Primary and Secondary Drinking Water Standards established under
the Safe Drinking Water Act (EPA: BNA, June 1989 and EPA: BNA, October 1988).
The results presented in Table 3-9 indicate that the extracts from the EP toxicity, the
TCLP1, and the TCLP2 extraction techniques generally contain higher
concentrations of metals than the extracts produced by the other extraction
techniques. The data in this table also indicate that the extracts from the
CO2 extraction technique generally contain lower concentrations of metals than the
extracts produced by the other extraction techniques.
For this facility, none of the extracts exceeded the EP Toxicity Maximum Allowable
Limits established in Section 261.24 of 40 CFR 261.
Although the ash extracts would not be required to meet Drinking Water Standards,
a comparison of the ash extract results with the Drinking Water Standards was
made. This comparison indicates that the majority of the metals results met these
standards.
Table 3-10 presents the range of results of the conventional analyses of the ash
extracts from MWC Facility ZB and the leachate sample from the ash fill serving this
R339911 3-5
-------
facility. For comparison, this table also lists the Primary Drinking Water standards for
nitrate, as well as the Secondary Drinking Water Standards for chloride, sulfate, and
Total Dissolved Solids (IDS). The data in this table indicate that the results for the
conventional compounds from the CO2 extraction technique are generally lower
than the results from the other extraction techniques.
R339911 3-6
-------
TABLE 3-1
ASH SEMIVOLATILE RESULTS • SAMPLE ZB-AH-001
FACILITY ZB
Parameter
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
Ash Sample Result
(ug/kg)
810JB
Indicates approximate value because contaminants were detected
at levels below Method Detection Limits, but above the instrument
detection limit.
Laboratory identified compound as not being detected
substantially above the level reported in laboratory blanks.
Laboratory may be the source of the compound.
R339911
3-7
-------
ASH
TABLE 3-2
DIOXIN RESULTS - SAMPLE ZB-AH-001
FACILITY ZB
PCDD/PCDF Homolog
2,3,7,8-TCDD
Other TCDD
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
Other PeCDD
1,2,3,4,7,8-HXCDD
1,2,3,6,7,8-HXCDD
1,2,3,7,8,9-HXCDD
Other HXCDD
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
Other HpCDD
OCDD
2,3,7,8-TCDF
Other TCDF
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
Other PeCDF
1,2,3,4,7,8-HXCDF
1,2,3,6,7,8-HXCDF
1,2,3,7,8,9-HXCDF
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
Other HXCDF
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
Other HpCDF
OCDF
Total Toxicity Equivalent
Ash Sample Result
pg/g
(Ppt)
24
351
118
759
40
34
79
342
319
288
544
617
3,721
194
162
1,527
336
524
127
54
939
539
48
197
243
Toxicity
Equivalency
Factor! D
1.0
0.01
0.5
0.005
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.0004
0.001
0.00001
0
0.1
0.001
0.1
0.1
0.001
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.0001
0.001
0.001
0.00001
0
Toxicity
Equivalent
(Ppt)
24
3.51
59
3.80
1.6
1.36
3.16
0 137
0.319
0.00288
0
61.7
3.72
19.4
16.2
1.53
3.36
5.24
1.27
0.54
0.0939
0.539
0.048
0.00197
0
211 ppt
Toxicity Equivalency Factors are EPA's current recommended factors (EPA, March 1987).
R339911
3-8
-------
METALS
TABLE 3-3
ASH METALS ANALYSES
FACILITY ZB
Parameter
Samples
ZB-AH-001
ZB-AH-002
ZB-AH-003
ZB-AH-004
ZB-AH-005
(mg/kg)
(mg/kg)
(mg/kg)
(mg/kg)
(mg/kg)
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Iron
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Zinc
28
484
52
53
9,330
18,800
1,070
508
8.2
5.7
6.9
8,200
8,580
45
322
152
74
1,370
19,300
1,630
559
11
NO
9.4
9,210
6,480
31
1,000
64
67
674
13,600
1,490
622
7.7
ND
6.0
8,940
4,360
56
260
57
118
842
21,500
1,420
846
8.0
ND
10
9,810
15,800
54
283
58
65
4,440
22,200
1,740
515
12
ND
5.4
10,600
6,450
METAL OXIDES
Aluminum Oxide
Calcium Oxide
Magnesium Oxide
Potassium
Monoxide
Silicon Dioxide
8.46
19.4
1.40
0.941
28.9
10.3
22.3
1.62
0.827
22.1
9.35
21.2
1.45
0.938
29.4
9.26
20.6
1.54
0.912
28.2
739
25.7
1.19
0866
19.0
ND Not detected.
R339911
3-9
-------
TABLE 3-4
ASH CONVENTIONAL ANALYSES
FACILITY ZB
Parameter
PH
Moisture Content*
TOC
Total Soluble Solids
Ammonia
Nitrate
Orthophosphate
Total Alkalinity
Chloride
Sulfate
Units
S.U.
%
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
Samples
ZB-AH-001
11.48
4.5
14,600
36,700
3.69
2.65
ND
4,520
18,600
963
ZB-AH-002
10.91
5.1
29,600
65,800
10.6
2.75
ND
1,590
44,200
764
ZB-AH-003
11.49
2.7
22,800
44,000
3.93
1.45
ND
5,150
19,500
3,130
ZB-AH-004
11.59
38
29,400
45,300
485
209
ND
6,650
28,000
2,440
ZB-AH-005
11.67
8.8
17,000
55,300
4.76
2.87
ND
6,320
31,400
1,340
ND Not detected.
* Determined after samples were prepared.
R339911
3-10
-------
TABLE 3-5
LEACHATE METALS ANALYSES
FACILITY ZB
Parameter
Aluminum
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Potassium
Selenium
Silicon
Silver
Sodium
Zinc
Sample (vg/L)
ZB-LE-001
NO
ND
9,220
4.0
8,390,000
ND
8.8
840
ND
17,300
17,600
ND
1,620,000
ND
3,150
ND
2,450,000
8.3
Standards/Criteria (yg/L)
EP Toxicity
Maximum
Allowable Limit
SNA
5,000
100,000
1,000
SNA
5,000
SNA
SNA
5,000
SNA
SNA
200
SNA
1,000
SNA
5,000
SNA
SNA
Safe Drinking
Water Act(a)
MCLs
SNA
50
1,000
10
SNA
50
SNA
SNA
50
SNA
SNA
2.0
SNA
10
SNA
50
SNA
SNA
Safe Drinking
Water Act(b)
SMCLs
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
1,000
300
SNA
SNA
50
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
5,000
ND Not detected.
SNA Standard Not Aval (able.
(a) Primary Drinking Water Standards.
(W Secondary Drinking Water Standards.
R339911
3-11
-------
TABLE 3-6
LEACHATE CONVENTIONAL ANALYSES
FACILITY ZB
Parameter
Ammonia-Distilled (as N)
Organic Carbon
Temperature (field)
Sulfate (SO4)
pH (field)
Solids, Dissolved @180°C
Specific Conductance @ 25°C
(field)
Total Alkalinity
Nitrate (as N)
Orthophosphate
Sample
Z8-LE-001
4.18mg/L
30 mg/L
9°C
171 mg/L
6.5
40,600 mg/L
>1 0,000 umhos/cm
65 mg/L
0.45 mg/L
0.01 mg/L
Standards/Criteria
Primary and Secondary
Drinking Water Quality
Standards
SNA
SNA
SNA
250 mg/L(b)
SNA
500 mg/L(b)
SNA
SNA
1 0 mg/L(a)
SNA
SNA Standard Not Available.
(a) Primary Drinking Water Standards.
(W Secondary Drinking Water Standards.
R339911
3-12
-------
TABLE 3-7
LEAK DETECTION SYSTEM SAMPLE METALS ANALYSES
FACILITY ZB
Parameter
Aluminum
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Potassium
Selenium
Silicon
Silver
Sodium
Zinc
Sample (vig/L)
ZB-LE-002
19
ND
64
ND
112,000
ND
5.4
ND
ND
15,700
6.7
ND
10,900
ND
3,590
ND
14,000
7.5
Standards/Criteria (ug/L)
EPToxicity
Maximum
Allowable Limit
SNA
5,000
100,000
1,000
SNA
5,000
SNA
SNA
5,000
SNA
SNA
200
SNA
1,000
SNA
5,000
SNA
SNA
Safe Drinking
Water Act(a)
MCLs
SNA
50
1,000
10
SNA
50
SNA
SNA
50
SNA
SNA
2.0
SNA
10
SNA
50
SNA
SNA
Safe Drinking
Water Act(W
SMCLs
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
1,000
300
SNA
SNA
50
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
5,000
ND Not detected.
SNA Standard Not Available.
(a) Primary Drinking Water Standards.
(fa) Secondary Drinking Water Standards.
R339911
3-13
-------
TABLE 3-8
LEAK DETECTION SYSTEM SAMPLE CONVENTIONAL ANALYSES
FACILITY ZB
Parameter
Ammonia-Distilled (as N)
Organic Carbon
Temperature (field)
Sulfate(SO4)
pH (field)
Solids, Dissolved @180°C
Specific Conductance @ 25°C
(field)
Total Alkalinity
Nitrate (as N)
Orthophosphate
Sample
ZB-LE-002
<0.05mg/L
10.6 mg/L
5°C
197mg/L
6.5
535mg/L
880 \i mhos/cm
154mg/L
0.01 mg/L
<0.01 mg/L
Standards/Criteria
Primary and Secondary
Drinking Water Quality
Standards
SNA
SNA
SNA
250mg/L(b)
SNA
500 mg/L(b)
SNA
SNA
10mg/L(a>
SNA
SNA Standard Not Available.
(a) Primary Drinking Water Standards.
(b) Secondary Drinking Water Standards.
R339911
3-14
-------
TABLE 3-9
COMPARISON OF ASH EXTRACTS METALS ANALYSES WITH LEACHATE METALS ANALYSES
RANGES OF CONCENTRATIONS
FACILITY ZB
Parameter
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Iron
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Zinc
Aluminum Oxide
Calcium Oxide
Magnesium Oxide
Potassium Monoxide
Silicon Dioxide
Samples (in pg/L)
CO2 Extracts
ND-53
126-381
ND-92
NO
88 30
ND
NO
NO- 11
ND
ND
ND
114.000-
168.000
5-21
4.990-90,700
737.000-
1.920.000
207-24,600
99,200-155.000
418-1,280
Dl H2O Extracts
ND
454-3.050
ND
ND
18-35
ND
ND-731
ND
ND
ND
ND
123,000-
209,000
40-349
161-48,400
810.000-
1,740.000
21-68
108,000
189,000
406-2,300
EPTOX Extracts
ND
182 350
25-485
ND
25-803
ND
ND-19
250-1.790
0.73-98
ND
ND
128,000-
225,000
67-9.630
ND-100
3.240.000-
4,810,000
70.400-130,000
101,000-
189,000
5,090-32.900
TCLP 1 Extracts
ND
498-1.850
ND
ND
10-36
ND
ND
ND 58
ND-0.25
ND
ND
1.410,000-
1,450,000
97-49
1,410-62.800
1,810,000-
2,750,000
55920
122,000-
203.000
3793,560
TCLP 2 Extracts
ND
321-511
ND-833
ND
5 4-262
ND-3,360
ND
39 2.250
0 37-4.6
ND
ND
1 16,000-
183,000
26-10,000
ND-7.760
3,210,000-
3,640,000
12,400-137,000
100,000
167,000
820-79,000
SAR Extracts
ND
1,150-3.960
ND
ND
21-64
ND
ND 2jt
HO
ND
ND
ND
117,000-
201,000
20-287
102-102,000
699,000-
1.690,000
17-65
114.000-
181,000
544-2,330
Leachate(')
ND
9,220
40
ND
88
840
ND
17,600
ND
ND
ND
2,450,000
83
ND
8,390,000
17.300
1,620,000
3,150
Standards/Criteria (in iig/L)
EPIoxicity
Maximum
Allowable
Limit
5,000
100,000
1,000
5,000
SNA
SNA
S.OOO
SNA
200
1,000
5,000
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
Sale
Drink incj
Water AitW
MCLs
50
1,000
10
50
SNA
SNA
SO
SNA
2
10
SO
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
Safe
Drinking
Water Act
-------
TABLE 3-10
COMPARISON OF ASH EXTRACTS CONVENTIONAL ANALYSES WITH LEACHATE CONVEN MONAL ANALYSES
RANGES OF CONCENTRATIONS
FACILITY ZB
Parameter
Ammonia-Distilled
2 Extracts
NA
NA
1.080-2,930
22 9-662
NA
NA
0 14-0 36
ND-001
5 51-584
939-1061
Ol H>O Extracts
0 10-0 28
3.37-6 52
1.070-3,040
ND-119
2.180-4,310
285996
0 11-024
ND
11 78-1224
11 12-1248
EP TOX Extracts
NA
NA
1,020-3,440
556-950
NA
NA
0 13-034
006-1 32
11 83 1230
577-864
1CLP 1 Lxtraus
NA
NA
1,3403,500
4 4-524
NA
NA
0 13-031
ND-001
11 78-1224
1040-11 83
TCLP 2 Extracts
NA
NA
1,270-2,720
674-1,110
NA
NA
0 07-0 30
0.01-1 75
11 78-1224
6 23-9 53
SAR Extracts
NA
4 52-11 5
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
ND
1145-1201
1083-1242
Leachaie
4 18
300
NA
1/1
40,600
65
045
ND-0 01
NA
NA
SidnddrdWCnlbna (in mg/L)
EPToxicity
Maximum
Allowable
Limit
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
Sdle Drinking
Water ActW
MCLs
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
10
SNA
SNA
SNA
Safe Drinking
Water AUM
SMCLs
SNA
SNA
250
2bO
500
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
U)
NA Not analyzed due to differences in scope of work
NO Not Detected
SNA Standard Not Available
(a) Primary Drinking Water Standards
(b) Secondary Drinking Water Standards
-------
-------
4.0 FACILITY ZC FINDINGS
4.1 FACILITY ZC DESCRIPTION
Facility ZC consists of three mass-burn, water-wall boilers. Refuse is charged into the
boilers by overhead cranes, moves inside the boilers on grates, and is discharged into
ash quench units on the bottom of the boilers. Fly ash in the exhaust gas is collected
and mixed with the bottom ash for disposal. The steam generated at the facility is
used to generate electricity, which is sold to a local utility. The following details
provide operational information for this facility.
Startup Date:
Refuse Feed Rate:
Operating Temperature:
Residence Time:
Backup Fuel:
Air Temperature Into Furnace:
Air Feed Rate:
Refuse Feed Method:
Trash Accepted:
Source of Ash Quench Water:
Electricity Generated:
Electricity Used by Facility:
January 1987.
400 tons/day/boiler.
1,750-1,800° F.
Approximately 1-1/2 hours in boiler, where the
grates can be slowed to allow wet loads more time
to dry out.
Natural gas - has only been used at start ups and
shutdowns.
Underfire air 380° F; overfire air not heated.
Varies-underfire air 40,000 cfm; overfire air
6,000 cfm.
Old and new refuse is mixed with an overhead
crane. Mixed refuse is loaded into boilers with the
overhead crane. Not much mixing was observed by
NUS personnel.
Any residential, commercial, or industrial waste
generated in the local community. No sewage
sludge is accepted. Some waste oil is disposed of at
the facility.
Ash quench water consists of effluent from a local
sewage treatment plant.
29 Megawatts/hour.
2-1/2 Megawatts/hour.
R339911
4-1
-------
Ash-Handling Equipment
The flue gas passes through electrostatic precipitators (ESPs), where the fly ash is
removed from the flue gases. The fly ash is then transported back to ash quench
reactors located at the bottom of each boiler, where it is mixed with the bottom ash.
The fly ash is mixed with the bottom ash in the ash quench reactors. From there, the
ash mixture is discharged onto a large shaker conveyor. It travels to a grizzly, where
large items are removed, is discharged onto a small shaker or pan conveyor, and is
then discharged onto an inclined conveyor belt. The ferrous material is removed at
the top of the conveyor belt by a rotating electromagnet. The ash falls from the
inclined belt onto a final shaker conveyor and then falls through one of two chutes
onto the ash pile. The ash is loaded onto trucks for transportation to the ash fill. The
ferrous material is recycled after passing through a trommel, where small particles of
ash clinging to the metal are removed.
The ash samples at Facility ZC were collected from the final shaker conveyor after the
ferrous material was removed and before the ash passed through the chutes onto
the ash pile. The ash had a tendency to segregate itself at the top of the inclined
conveyor belt. The large particles came directly from the inclined conveyor and onto
the shaker conveyor, whereas the finer, wetter particles stuck to the belt and started
back down on the underside of the inclined conveyor. These finer particles were
scraped off the underside of the belt about 6 feet from the top of the conveyor. Ash
samples were collected both from the shaker conveyor and as the ash was scraped
off the bottom of the inclined conveyor.
During the first part of one day's sampling, the samples were collected as the ash
came off the grizzly because the inclined conveyor was shut down for repairs. In
addition, the location of the sampling point on the final shaker conveyor changed as
the facility changed the chutes being used to deposit the ash on the ash pile.
4.2 CHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF ASH
Table 4-1 presents the results of the semivolatile analysis of the ash samples from
Facility ZC. The data in this table indicate that bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate and
di-n-butyl phthalate were detected in sample ZC-AH-003, the only sample from this
R339911 4-2
-------
facility analyzed for the Appendix IX semivolatiles. These compounds appear to be
the result of laboratory contamination.
Table 4-2 presents the results of the polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin and
polychlorinated dibenzofuran (PCDD/PCDF) analyses of sample ZC-AH-003. Toxicity
equivalency values were calculated according to EPA's methodology (EPA,
March 1987) and are presented in this table. The data in this table indicate that the
PCDDs/PCDFs levels found in the ash are substantially below the Centers for Disease
Control (CDC) recommended upper level of 2,3,7,8-TCDD toxicity equivalency of
1 part per billion in residential soil (Kimbrough, 1984).
The results of the metals analyses for the ash from this facility are presented in
Table 4-3. The data in this table indicate that, except for copper and manganese, the
results were fairly constant during the week of sampling.
The results for the conventional analyses are presented in Table 4-4. The data in this
table indicate that, except for nitrate, and total alkalinity, the results were also fairly
constant during the week.
4.3 CHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF LE AC HATES
The facility used for the disposal of ash from MWC Facility ZC is lined and is also used
for the disposal of ash from a different MWC facility. In addition, municipal waste in
excess of the capacity of the MWC facilities is disposed of at this ash disposal facility.
Of the ash disposed of at this facility, two-thirds of it comes from MWC Facility ZC.
The two leachate samples from the ash disposal facility for MWC Facility ZC were two
grab samples collected from the same leachate collection sump.
No Appendix IX semivolatile compounds or PCDDs/PCDFs were detected in the
leachate samples from the ash disposal facility for MWC Facility ZC.
The results for the metals analysis of the leachate samples are shown in Table 4-5.
The data in this table indicate that none of the compounds exceeded the EP Toxicity
Maximum Allowable Limit. Although the leachates are not required to meet
Drinking Water Standards, a comparison of the leachate results with the Primary and
Secondary Drinking Water Standards established under the Safe Drinking Water Act
R339911 4-3
-------
(EPA: BNA, June 1989 and EPA: BNA, October 1988) was made. This comparison
indicates that the results for all but manganese met these standards in the leachate.
Table 4-6 presents the results of the conventional analyses of the leachate samples.
TDS values ranged from 924 mg/L to 932 mg/L, and the pH of the leachate was 6.9.
4.4 CHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF ASH EXTRACTS
No Appendix IX semivolatile compounds or PCDDs/PCDFs were detected in the
composite sample from the deionized water extracts (SW-924) of the ash from MWC
Facility ZC
Table 4-7 presents the range of results of the metals analyses of the ash extracts from
MWC Facility ZC and the range of results for the leachate samples for the ash fill
serving this facility. For comparison, this table also lists the EP Toxicity Maximum
Allowable Limits, and the Primary and Secondary Drinking Water Standards
established under the Safe Drinking Water Act (EPA: BNA, June 1989 and EPA: BNA,
October 1988).
The results presented in Table 4-7 indicate that the extracts from the EP Toxicity, the
TCLP1, and the TCLP 2 extraction techniques generally contain higher metal
concentrations than the extracts produced by the other extraction techniques. The
data in this table also indicate that the extracts from the deionized water extraction
technique (SW-924) and the SAR extraction technique generally contain lower metal
concentrations than the extracts produced by the other extraction techniques.
For this facility, the extracts from the EP Toxicity, as well as the TCLP 2 extraction
techniques, exceeded the EP Toxicity Maximum Allowable Limits established in
Section 261.24 of 40CFR261 for cadmium and lead, whereas the extracts from the
TCLP 1 extraction technique exceeded the EP Toxicity Maximum Allowable Limits
only for cadmium.
Although the ash extracts would not be required to meet Drinking Water Standards,
a comparison of the ash extract results with the Drinking Water Standards was
made. This comparison indicates that the majority of the metals results met these
standards.
R339911 4-4
-------
Table 4-8 presents the range of results of the conventional analyses of the ash
extracts from MWC Facility ZC and the range of results for the leachate samples from
the ash fill serving this facility. For comparison, this table also lists the Primary
Drinking Water Standards for nitrate, as well as the Secondary Drinking Water
Standards for chloride, sulfate, and Total Dissolved Solids (TDS).
R339911 4-5
-------
TABLE 4-1
ASH SEMIVOLATILE RESULTS - SAMPLE ZC-AH-003
FACILITY ZC
Parameter
Bis(2-ethylhexyi)phthalate
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Ash Sample Result
(ug/kg)
310JB
400JB
Indicates approximate value because contaminants were
detected at levels below Method Detection Limits, but above
the instrument detection limits.
Laboratory identified compound as not being detected
substantially above the level reported in laboratory blanks
Laboratory may be the source of the compound.
R339911
4-6
-------
ASH
TABLE 4-2
DIOXIN RESULTS • SAMPLE ZC-AH-003
FACILITY ZC
PCDD/PCDF Homolog
2,3,7,8-TCDD
Other TCDO
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
Other PeCDD
1,2,3,4,7,8-HXCDD
1,2,3,6,7,8-HXCDD
1,2,3,7,8,9-HXCDD
Other HXCDD
1 ,2,3,4,6, 7,8-HpCDD
Other HpCDD
OCDD
2,3,7,8-TCDF
Other TCDF
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
Other PeCDF
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
1, 2,3,6, 7,8-HxCDF
1,2,3,7,8,9-HXCDF
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
Other HXCDF
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
Other HpCDF
OCDF
Total Toxicity Equivalent
Ash Sample Result
pg/g
(ppt)
16
281
71
1,051
66
90
120
925
1,849
1,511
6,906
236
1,208
64
56
607
218
279
193
70
635
653
83
254
563
Toxicity
Equivalency
Factor* D
1.0
0.01
0.5
0.005
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.0004
0.001
0.00001
0
0.1
0.001
0.1
0.1
0.001
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.0001
0.001
0.001
0.00001
0
Toxicity
Equivalent
(PPt)
16
2.81
35.5
5.26
2.64
3.6
4.8
0.37
1 85
0.0151
0
236
1 21
6.4
56
0.607
2.18
2.79
1.93
0.70
0.0635
0.653
0.083
0.00254
0
119 ppt
> Toxicity Equivalency Factors are EPA's current recommended factors, (EPA, March 1987).
R339911
4-7
-------
METALS
TABLE 4-3
ASH METALS ANALYSES
FACILITY ZC
Parameter
Samples
ZC-AH-001
ZC-AH-002
ZC-AH-003
ZC-AH-004
ZC-AH-005
(mg/kg)
(mg/kg)
(mg/kg)
(mg/kg)
(mg/kg)
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Iron
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Zinc
31
213
42
51
1,150
21,300
2,380
1,200
1.8
ND
8.8
8,630
4,660
36
193
49
53
524
20,000
2,580
826
1.1
ND
12
8,940
7,170
30
248
52
57
4,470
23,500
1,760
898
2.3
ND
5.8
7,940
4,390
28
314
47
45
758
22,100
2,630
565
3.2
ND
5.6
8,040
4,180
29
331
48
48
547
25,000
1,710
518
1 7
ND
6.0
7,370
4,110
METAL OXIDES
Aluminum Oxide
Calcium Oxide
Magnesium Oxide
Potassium
Monoxide
Silicon Dioxide
8.64
9.7
1.02
0.875
62.9
7.98
11.4
1.17
1.07
53.8
6.67
10.8
1.3
1.04
48.4
6.65
10.3
1.08
1.03
57.0
5.93
10.6
1.11
0.992
49.5
ND Not detected.
S3399V
4-8
-------
TABLE 4-4
ASH CONVENTIONAL ANALYSES
FACILITY ZC
Parameter
pH
Moisture Content*
TOC
Total Soluble Solids
Ammonia
Nitrate
Orthophosphate
Total Alkalinity
Chloride
Sulfate
Units
S.U.
%
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
Samples
ZC-AH-001
11.75
1.0
9,020
24,600
1.49
6.46
ND
2,690
5,180
7,870
ZC-AH-002
11.82
1.5
12,300
22,000
1.86
0.11
NO
2,970
3,870
5,900
ZC-AH-003
11.58
2.0
14,100
23,600
1.40
0.09
ND
1,210
4,180
7,400
ZC-AH-004
11.82
0.6
9,830
23,000
1 33
0.14
ND
2,840
5,860
9,060
ZC-AH-005
11 74
1 4
17,800
26,100
2.10
0.28
ND
3,040
5,280
10,300
ND Not detected.
*Determined after samples were prepared.
R339911
4-9
-------
TABLE 4-5
LEACHATE METALS ANALYSES
FACILITYZC
Parameter
Aluminum
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Potassium
Selenium
Silicon
Silver
Sodium
Zinc
Samples (yg/L)
ZC-LE-001
ND
ND
7.8
ND
64,600
ND
ND
108
ND
22,600
493
ND
79,700
ND
4,570
ND
188,000
13
ZC-LE-002
ND
ND
8.0
ND
65,800
ND
ND
115
34
23,000
501
ND
81,200
ND
4,840
ND
191,000
9.0
Standards/Criteria (ug/L)
EPToxicity
Maximum
Allowable Limit
SNA
5,000
100,000
1,000
SNA
5,000
SNA
SNA
5,000
SNA
SNA
200
SNA
1,000
SNA
5,000
SNA
SNA
Safe Drinking
Water Act(a)
MCLs
SNA
50
1,000
10
SNA
50
SNA
SNA
50
SNA
SNA
2.0
SNA
10
SNA
50
SNA
SNA
Safe Drinking
Water Act<&>
SMCLs
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
1,000
300
SNA
SNA
50
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
5,000
ND Not detected.
SNA Standard Not Available.
(a) Primary Drinking Water Standards.
(b) Secondary Drinking Water Standards.
R339911
4-10
-------
TABLE 4-6
LEACHATE CONVENTIONAL ANALYSES
FACILITY ZC
Parameter
Ammonia-Distilled (as N)
Organic Carbon
Temperature (field)
Sulfate(SO4)
pH (field)
Solids, Dissolved @180°C
Specific Conductance @ 25°C
(field)
Total Alkalinity
Nitrate (as N)
Orthophosphate
Samples
ZC-LE-001
68.2 mg/L
47.2 mg/L
21°C
14.5 mg/L
6.9
924 mg/L
1,800umhos/cm
560 mg/L
0.40 mg/L
<0.01 mg/L
ZC-LE-002
77.4 mg/L
49.3 mg/L
NA
14.4 mg/L
NA
932 mg/L
NA
566 mg/L
0.41 mg/L
<0.01 mg/L
Standards/Criteria
Primary and Secondary
Drinking Water Quality
Standards
SNA
SNA
SNA
250 mg/L(t>>
SNA
500 ,(b
SNA
SNA
10mg/L(a)
SNA
NA Not analyzed a second time. Temperature, specific conductance, and pH were only
measured once in the field.
SNA Standard Not Available.
Primary Drinking Water Standards.
(b) Secondary Drinking Water Standards.
R339911
4-11
-------
TABLE 4-7
COMPARISON OF ASH EXTRACTS METALS ANALYSES WITH LEACHATE METALS ANALYSES
RANGES OF CONCENTRATIONS
FACILITY ZC
Paiameler
Arsenic
Barium
Cddmium
Chromium
Copper
lion
lead
Manganese
Mercury
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
/me
Aluminum Oxide
Calcium Oxide
Magnesium Oxide
Potassium Monoxide
Silicon Dioxide
Samples (in ug/L)
CO, Extracts
NO
148-245
30 110
6898
33 146
ND 33
44 159
788-1.420
ND
ND
ND
139.000-
166.000
4.370 127.000
70 106
621.000-
759,000
23,200 34,700
108.000-
142,000
20,000 34,500
DIH^O Extracts
ND-45
139-192
ND
86 16
1246
ND-14
ND53
ND20
ND-0 32
ND
ND
140,000
189.000
37-270
50.400203,000
141.000-
193,000
42 318
1 16,000-
159,000
503-1.560
EP1OX Extracts
ND-22
23 198
897-1,200
36-72
929-2,300
3,160 24,300
5,180 10.400
2.600-8.540
ND-0 67
ND
ND
129,000
158,000
57,000-80.100
20.000-34.500
1.300.000-
1,600.000
47.800-63,000
1 10.000-
127.000
20.900 79.000
1CLP 1 Extracts
ND
197-275
646-1.020
56-80
50291
ND 113
337 2,960
1.900-5,170
ND 0 49
ND
NO
1.510.000-
1.640,000
24.300-47.400
ND 1.320
1,110.000
1.330,000
39.400-375,000
83,200-134.000
22,400-51.700
TCLP 2 Extracts
ND60
•12223
758 1.380
162 265
41 1.200
14,400-46,300
8,090 11,700
2.750-7.370
0 32-0 44
ND
ND
123.000-
170.000
51.900-94,400
98.200-118.000
1.500.000-
1,820.000
59.70083.600
91,200-
1,110.000
7.17048,700
SAR Extracts
ND
129 182
ND-60
59-83
8536
ND97
ND 201
ND64
ND 1 1
ND
ND
124.000-
160,000
30-132
74,500-118,000
142.000-
199,000
49-430
104.000
136,000
518-1.410
Leachaie>
SMCLS
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
1,000
300
SNA
SO
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
5,000
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
NJ
ND
SNA
Not Delected
Sunddid Not Available
(a) I'nmjiy (>iin> iillj W.jli'l Sl.i
(ii) Set ondkiry Onnkinrj vVuler
(c) Kiiulli loi jluiiiinum i jl. .
-------
TABLE 4-8
COMPARISON OF ASH EXTRACTS CONVENTIONAL ANALYSES WITH LEACHATE CONVENTIONAL ANALYSES
MANGES Of CONCENTRATIONS
FACILITY ZC
Pacauieler
Ammonia-Distilled
(asN)
1 otal Organic Cai bov\
Chloride
Sulfdte
Solids. Dissolved
180-C
Total Alkalinity
Nitrate (as N)
Orthophosphate
titr act's Initial pll
Extract's Final pH
Samples (m mtj/L)
CO2 Extracts
0 120 19
NA
173 195
587 777
NA
NA
0 O/ 1 59
NO 002
5 74-5 93
6 68-6 99
01 H^O Extracts
0 16-0 24
451 7 IS
181-230
187-448
I.OSO- 1.320
228696
006-094
NO-0 01
1052-1070
10 28 1060
tPTOX Lxtraus
0 19-0 10
NA
183-226
727-1,650
NA
NA
031-071
NO 0 22
1063-1084
4 97-5 02
KIP 1 Extracts
0 15-0 19
NA
189-255
585-984
NA
NA
025 1 33
ND 001
4 86-5 01
5 99-7 00
TtLP 2 Extracts
0 18-0 32
•NA
196 281
536 1,140
NA
NA
008-15 3
0 79-2 04
3 28 3 64
4 63 4 79
SAR Extracts
28 302
2 58 554
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NO-0 01
1020-1041
1025-1063
leachate
68 2-774
47 2-49 3
NA
14 4 14 5
924-932
560-566
0400 41
ND
NA
NA
Sidi id jr ds/Cr i tena (in mg/L)
EPToxioly
Maximum
Allowable
Limit
5NA
SNA
SNA
5NA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
Sale- DitnkirM}
Water AclW
MCLs
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
10
SNA
SNA
SNA
Sale Dnnkmg
Water AcllW
SMCLs
SNA
SNA
250
250
500
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
U)
NA Not analyzed due to differences in scope of work
ND Not Delected
SNA Standard Not Available
(a) Primary Drinking Water Standards
(b) Secondary Drinking Water Standards
-------
-------
5.0 FACILITY ZD FINDINGS
5.1
FACILITY ZD DESCRIPTION
Facility ZD consists of two mass-burn, water-wall boilers. Refuse is charged into the
boiler by overhead cranes, moves inside the boilers on grates, and is discharged into
an ash quench tank located below the boilers. Fly ash in the exhaust gas is collected
and mixed with the bottom ash for disposal. The steam generated by the facility is
used to generate electricity, which is sold to a local utility. The following details
outline operational information for this facility.
Refuse Feed Rate:
Operating Temperature:
Residence Time:
Backup Fuel:
Air Feed Information:
Refuse Feed Method:
Trash Accepted:
Source of Ash Quench Water:
750 tons/day/boiler.
2,400-2,600° F.
Approximately 45 minutes in boiler where the
grates can be slowed to allow wet loads more time
to dry out; approximately 10 minutes from ash
quench to ash pile.
None.
Primary air comes from the charging floor and
tipping floor. Secondary air comes from outside the
building. Neither is preheated.
Refuse is dumped on the tipping floor. The tipping
floor is covered, but is not totally enclosed. Old and
new waste is mixed with an overhead crane. Mixing
of the waste did not appear to be done frequently.
The overhead crane loads the waste into the feed
hopper on the boilers.
Residential (90%) and commercial/light industrial
(10%) waste generated in surrounding
communities. No sewage sludge, pathological,
hazardous, biological, dental, or liquid wastes are
accepted.
Ash quench water consists of blowdowns from
cooling tower and boiler and cooling water. City
water is used as makeup water.
R339911
5-1
-------
Ash-Handling Equipment
The bottom ash is discharged into one of two quench tanks, which are equipped
with drag flight conveyors. The ash settles to the bottom of the quench tank and is
moved along by the drag flights, then travels up an incline, and is discharged into a
trommel with 3-inch openings. The material that is larger than 3 inches in size
travels through the trommel and is deposited in a truck. This material is then sent to
an onsite magnetic separator, where the ferrous metal is removed. Any remaining
material is added to the waste in the receiving trench and is sent back through the
incinerator. The material that is smaller than 3 inches in size drops through the
trommel onto a vibrating conveyor. A rotating magnet is used to remove the ferrous
material. All other material is deposited in a truck for disposal in the ash fill.
The fly ash is removed from the exhaust gas by electrostatic precipitators (ESPs) and
is mixed with the bottom ash in the quench tanks. The drag flights are shut down
when trucks are being switched.
The ash samples at Facility ZD were collected from the vibrating conveyor just after
the electromagnet removed the ferrous material and just before the ash was
deposited in the truck used to transport it to the ash disposal facility. This MWC
facility had two ash conveyors that it could use to move the ash from the ash quench
tanks to the ash trucks. All of the samples were collected from just one ash conveyor.
5.2 CHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF ASH
Table 5-1 presents the results of the semivolatile analysis of the ash samples from
Facility ZD. The data in this table indicate that some phthalates were detected in
sample ZD-AH-003, the only sample from this facility analyzed for the Appendix IX
semivolatiles. These compounds appear to be the result of laboratory
contamination. The data also indicate that low levels of phenanthrene (310 ppb)
andfluoranthene (170 ppb) were detected in sample ZD-AH-003. Phenanthrene and
fluoranthene are polynudear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and are common
products of the combustion of organic material.
Table 5-2 presents the results of the polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin and
polychlorinated dibenzofuran (PCDD/PCDF) analyses of sample ZD-AH-003. Toxicity
R339911 5-2
-------
equivalency values were calculated using EPA's methodology (EPA, March 1987) and
are presented in this table. The data in this table indicate that the PCDDs/'PCDFs
levels found in the ash are below the Centers for Disease Control (CDC)
recommended upper level of 2,3,7,8-TCDD toxicity equivalency of 1 part per billion
in residential soil (Kimbrough, 1984).
The results of the metals analyses for the ash from this facility are presented in
Table 5-3. The data in this table indicate that, except for chromium, copper, lead,
and zinc, the results were fairly constant during the week of sampling.
The results for the conventional analyses are presented in Table 5-4. The data in this
table indicate that, except for TOC, nitrate, sulfate, and chloride, the results were
also fairly constant during the week the samples were collected.
5.3 CHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF LEACHATES
The facility used for the disposal of ash from MWC Facility ZD is unlined and is used
exclusively for the disposal of ash from Facility ZD. The leachate samples from the
ash disposal facility for MWC Facility ZD were grab samples collected from shallow
water quality lysimeters installed in the ash fill after the ash had been placed.
Samples ZD-LE-001 and ZD-LE-003 were collected from the same lysimeter in an area
of more recently disposed ash. Sample ZD-LE-002 was collected from a lysimeter in
an area of older ash. Figure 5-1 gives a general description of the lysimeter's
construction.
No Appendix IX semivolatile compounds or PCDDs/PCDFs were detected in the
leachate samples from the ash disposal facility for MWC Facility ZD.
The results for the metals analysis of the leachate samples are shown in Table 5-5.
The data in this table indicate that the results for all three samples are generally
consistent. However, the results for ZD-LE-002, which was collected in an area of
older ash, are generally lower than the results for the other two samples.
R339911 5-3
-------
STELrSCTETNE
CASING WTHlOTGi
CAP
WA7L3,CUALiTf
LYSiME!3
39ITCNITH'3nCUT
3BTON1TE3EAL
OTTAWA SAND PACK
CGUUECMLSOO
NOTE: ILLUSTRATION NOT TO SCALE
WATER
QUALITY
LYSIMETER
10
B-3A
C-1AA
C-4A
E-1A
TOTAL DEPTH
BELOW GRADE
(Feet)
9.5
10.5
10.0
10.25
THICKNESS
BENTONITE
CEMENT
GROUT
(Feet)
2.25
4.0
3.5
3.75
THICKNESS
BENTONITE
SEAL
(Feet)
2.25
2.25
2.0
2.0
THICKNESS OF
OTTAWA
SAND
(Feet)
5.0
4.25
4.5
4.5
FIGURE 5-1
WATER QUALITY LYSIMETER INSTALLATION DETAIL
R339911
5-4
-------
The data in Table 5-5 also indicate that none of the metals exceeded the EP Toxicity
Maximum Allowable Limits. Although the leachates are not required to meet
Drinking Water Standards, a comparison of the leachate results with the Primary and
Secondary Drinking Water Standards established under the Safe Drinking Water Act
(EPA: BNA, June 1989 and EPA: BNA, October 1988) was made. This comparison
indicates that the results for all but iron and manganese met these standards.
Table 5-6 presents the results of the conventional analyses of the leachate samples.
TDS values ranged from 8,030 mg/L to 13,000 mg/L
5.4 CHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF ASH EXTRACTS
No PCDDs/PCDFs were detected in the composite sample from the deionized water
extracts of the ash from MWC Facility ZD.
Table 5-7 presents the results of the Appendix IX semivolatile analysis of the
composite sample from the deionized water extract of the ash from MWC
Facility ZD. Benzoic acid (26 ppb) was the only Appendix IX semivolatile compound
found in this composite sample. This table also indicates that no Appendix IX
semivolatile compounds were detected in the leachate samples from the ash fill
serving this facility.
Table 5-8 presents the range of results of the metals analyses of the ash extracts from
MWC Facility ZD and the range of results of the leachate samples from the ash fill
serving this facility. For comparison, this table also lists the EP Toxicity Maximum
Allowable Limits, and the Primary and Secondary Drinking Water Standards
established under the Safe Drinking Water Act (EPA: BNA, June 1989 and EPA: BNA,
October 1988).
The results presented in Table 5-8 indicate that the extracts from the EP Toxicity, the
TCLP1, and the TCLP2 extraction techniques generally contain higher
concentrations of metals than the extracts produced by the other extraction
techniques. For this facility, the extracts from the EP toxicity, the TCLP 1, and the
TCLP2 extraction techniques exceeded the EP Toxicity Maximum Allowable Limits
established in Section 261.24of 40 CFR 261 for cadmium and lead.
R339911 5-5
-------
Although the ash extracts would not be required to meet Drinking Water Standards,
a comparison of the ash extract results with the Drinking Water Standards was
made. This comparison indicates that the majority of the metals results met these
standards.
Table 5-9 presents the range of results of the conventional analyses of the ash
extracts from MWC Facility ZD and the leachate samples from the ash fill serving this
facility. For comparison, this table also lists the Primary Drinking Water Standards
for nitrate, as well as the Secondary Drinking Water Standards for chloride, sulfate,
and Total Dissolved Solids (TDS).
R339911 5-6
-------
TABLE 5-1
ASH SEMI VOLATILE RESULTS - SAMPLE ZD-AH-003
FACILITY ZD
Parameter
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Fluoranthene
Phenanthrene
Ash Sample Result
(ug/kg)
390JB
270JB,
170J
310J
Indicates approximate value because contaminants were
detected at levels below Method Detection Limits, but above
the instrument detection limit.
Laboratory identified compound as not being detected
substantially above the level reported in laboratory blanks.
Laboratory may be the source of the compound.
Compound was identified during data validation as not being
detected substantially above the level reported in the
laboratory blanks. Laboratory may be the source of the
contamination.
R339911
5-7
-------
TABLE 5-2
ASH DIOXIN RESULTS - SAMPLE ZD-AH-003
FACILITY ZD
PCDO/PCDF Homolog
2,3,7,8-TCDD
Other TCDD
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
Other PeCDD
1,2,3,4,7,8-HXCDD
1,2,3,6,7,8-HXCDO
1,2,3,7,8,9-HXCDD
Other HXCDD
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
Other HpCDO
OCDD
2,3,7.8-TCDF
Other TCDF
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
Other PeCDF
1,2,3A7,8-HXCDF
1,2,3,6,7,8-HXCDF
1,2,3,7,8,9-HXCDF
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
Other HXCDF
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
Other HpCDF
OCDF
Total Toxicity Equivalent
Ash Sample Result
pg/g
(ppt)
35
541
ND
1,910
86
148
194
853
1,555
1,384
4,519
626
2,633
151
171
1,736
654
660
479
124
1,686
1,842
119
384
893
Toxicity
Equivalency
Factor* 1>
1.0
0.01
0.5
0.005
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.0004
0.001
0.00001
0
0.1
0.001
0.1
0.1
0.001
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.0001
0.001
0.001
0.00001
0
Toxicity
Equivalent
(ppt)
35
5.41
0
955
3 44
592
7 76
0 34
1 56
00138
0
626
2 63
15 1
17 '
1 74
6.54
6.60
4.79
1.24
0 169
1 84
0.119
0.00384
0
189 ppt
ND-Not detected below 221 pg/g.
0)Toxicity Equivalency Factors are EPA's current recommended factors (EPA, March 1987).
R339911
5-8
-------
METALS
TABLE 5-3
ASH METALS ANALYSES
FACILITY ZD
Parameter
Samples
ZD-AH-001
ZD-AH-002
ZD-AH-003
ZE-AH-004
ZD-AH-005
(mg/kg)
(mg/kg)
(mg/kg)
(mg/kg)
(mg/kg)
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Iron
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Zinc
30
411
51
87
1,050
34,600
4,090
574
0.91
2.9
7.5
6,050
5,660
54
440
66
199
960
37,100
5,040
609
1.5
NO
9.4
6,480
6,560
43
545
69
70
1,490
27,400
2,980
618
2.1
3.1
11
6,500
8,000
44
434
42
54
959
31,100
2,860
965
0.55
3.9
6.3
6,100
4,930
36
432
39
52
1,800
22,900
22,400
636
0.97
3.2
7.6
5,890
4,260
METAL OXIDES
Aluminum Oxide
Calcium Oxide
Magnesium Oxide
Potassium
Monoxide
Silicon Dioxide
12
11
2.0
1.4
35
12
11
1.9
1 1
37
13
10
2.2
0.79
35
9.9
12
2.2
1.1
32
11
11
1 8
0.98
36
NO Not detected.
R339911
5-9
-------
TABLE 5-4
ASH CONVENTIONAL ANALYSES
FACILITY ZD
Parameter
PH
Moisture Content*
TOC
Total Soluble Solids
Ammonia
Nitrate
Orthophosphate
Total Alkalinity
Chloride
Sulfate
Units
S.U.
%
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
Samples
ZD-AH-001
10.69
0.4
25,800
6,850
1.00
1.59
ND
852
1,270
2,220
ZD-AH-002
10.60
1 6
30,000
13,200
1 04
1.14
0.05
558
2,190
5,580
ZD-AH-003
10.51
1.2
52,100
6,440
1.02
0.44
0.05
786
766
1,680
ZD-AH-004
10.36
1.2
11,400
8,740
0.90
0.96
0.05
852
854
2,360
ZD-AH-005
10.46
0.9
53,200
7,150
1.08
0.72
0.05
922
869
1,800
NO Not detected.
* Determined after samples were prepared.
R339911
5-10
-------
TABLE 5-5
LEACHATE METALS ANALYSES
FACILITY ZD
Parameter
Aluminum
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Potassium
Selenium
Silicon
Silver
Sodium
Zinc
Samples (iig/L)
ZO-LE-001
NO
ND
40
ND
477,000
ND
12
187
ND
345.000
795
ND
636,000
ND
15.300
ND
2.480.000
87
ZD-LE-002
ND
ND
18
ND
386.000
ND
4.6
523
ND
367.000
718
ND
229.000
ND
8,760
ND
1.340,000
ND
ZD-LE-003
ND
ND
38
ND
470.000
ND
73
211
ND
340,000
857
ND
632.000
ND
14,900
ND
2.S80.000
52
Standards/Criteria (ug/L)
EP Toxicity
Maximum
Allowable
Limit
SNA
5,000
100,000
1,000
SNA
5.000
SNA
SNA
5.000
SNA
SNA
200
SNA
1.000
SNA
5.000
SNA
SNA
Safe Drinking
Water Act<*)
MCLs
SNA
50
1,000
10
SNA
50
SNA
SNA
50
SNA
SNA
0.2
SNA
10
SNA
50
SNA
NA
Safe Drinking
Water ActlW
SMCLs
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
1.000
300
SNA
SNA
50
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
5,000
en
ND Not detected
SNA Suinddfd Not Available
(«») Primary Drinking Water Standards
(b) Secondary Drinking Water Standards
-------
TABLE 5-6
LEACHATE CONVENTIONAL ANALYSES
FACILITY ZD
Parameter
Ammonia-Distilled (as N)
Organic Carbon
Temperature (field)
Sulfate (SO4)
pH (field)
Solids, Dissolved @ 180°C
Specific Conductance
@ 25°C (field)
Total Alkalinity
Nitrate (as N)
Orthophosphate
Samples
ZD-LE-001
4.38 mg/L
28.8 mg/L
30°C
4,920 mg/L
NAO)
12, 700 mg/L
>1 0,000 pmhos/cm
709 mg/L
0.04 mg/L
0.24 mg/L
ZD-LE-002
28 4 mg/L
30 .7 mg/L
19"C
4, 140 mg/L
NAO)
8,030 mg/L
9,400 pmhos/cm
744 mg/L
<001 mg/L
0.1 7 mg/L
2D-LE-003
NA<2>
NA<2>
30°C
5,080 mg/L
NA(D
13,000 mg/L
> 10,000 pmhos/cm
71 1 mg/L
<0 01 mg/L
0.22 mg/L
Standards/Criteria
Primary and
Secondary Drinking
Water Quality
Standards
SNA
SNA
SNA
250 mg/L)
SNA
500 mg/L(b)
SNA
SNA
10 mg/L U)
SNA
in
i
NJ
* pH meter was not working properly.
0) Not analyzed due to pH meter not working properly.
(2) Not analyzed since this sample was a duplicate of ZD-LE-001 and only selected parameters were analyzed for
SNA Standard Not Available.
(") Primary Drinking Water Standards.
(i>) Secondary Drinking Water Standards.
-------
TABLE 5-7
COMPARISON OF ASH EXTRACT SEMIVOLAT1LE RESULTS
TO LEACHATE SEMI VOLATILE RESULTS
FACILITY ZD
Parameter
Benzoic Acid
Samples (ug/D
Deionized Water Extract
26 JT
Leachate
ND
ND Not Detected.
J Indicates approximate value because contaminants were detected at levels below
Method Detection Limits, but above the instrument detection limits.
The mass spectrum does not meet EPA CLP criteria for confirmation, but compound
presence is strongly suspected.
3339911
5-13
-------
tO
0}
TABLE 5-8
COMPARISON OF ASH EXTRACTS METALS ANALYSES WITH LEACHATE METALS ANALYSES
RANGES OF CONCENTRATIONS
FACILITY ZD
Pardmeler
Barium
Cadmium
Ctiiommm
Copper
Iron
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Si uer
Sodium
Aluminum Oxide
Cdlcium Oxide
Magnesium Oxide
_^ ^_^_ __ ~- — •— — •
Potassium Monoxide
Silicon Dioxide
Samples (in ng/L)
CO2 Extracts
HO
227502
167 354
NO
42 246
NO-45
127-504
931 1.420
HP 077
ND
ND
24,800-49,800
15,200 30,600
ND-204
398,000-
759.000
35.000 59,300
12.300-33.400
24.000 29,700
Dl HiO Extracts
NO
201 285
NO
NO
3480
NO
NO
ND
NO 090
ND
ND
24.100-42.600
54-24
71,000-97,900
199,000-
255.000
71-156
13,100 30,400
402 642
EPTOX Extracts
ND
162-290
195 1,100
NO-49
24 1,550
1.200-27.100
3.490-19,700
1,3204.900
NO 0 29
ND
ND
33,600-52,500
30.300-95.600
4,870-18,200
592,000-
1,250,000
42,600 86,500
1 7.000-38.600
27.400 49,100
TCLP 1 Extracts
245418
426-1.150
NO 80
8 5-858
ND-7,220
4,050 10,500
1,940-3.110
ND-0 53
NO
NO
1.380.000-
1,430,000
43 400-79.500
3446.090
666,000-
970,000
56.300 73,000
14,600-32,000
25.600-33.400
1CIP 2 Extracts
1 10 586
601 1,560
145 799
125-1.400
32,800-103.000
22,700-26,400
3.350 5,750
NO
NO
ND
38,700-68.300
61,000 164.000
88.600 130,000
949,000
1.670,000
94,100-121,000
15,100-40,900
118.000-
143.000
5AR Extracts
166 262
ND
NO
32 82
NO
NO-43
ND
027 0 53
ND
NO
24,20042,100
12-35
/2.300 84.200
194,000
246,000
52 319
14,500-31,200
703 989
IfdChatelO
18-40
ND
NO
4 6 12
187-523
NO
718857
ND
ND
ND
1.340,000-
2.580,000
NO 8 7
NO
386,000-
477.000
340.000
367.000
229,000-
636.000
B./60 15.300
Standdrds/Criieiidlm ug/l)
EP loxitily
Maximum
Allouvable
Limit
100.000
1.000
5.000
SNA
SNA
5,000
SNA
200
1.000
5.000
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
Suit
Drinking
Wate< Actl")
MCLs
1,000
10
50
SNA
SO
SNA
2
10
SO
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
Sale
Drinking
Water Act»'l
SMCLs
SNA
SNA
SNA
1.000
300
SO
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
ND Nol Delected
SNA Sljndard No! Av
(a) Primary Drinking Water Standards
(l>) Stcondaiy Onokmy Wultr Standards
(() Hesulls lui .iluininuin laltium. maynesiurn. pnlassiurn. and siluonare lor meuK ».u noi u.ides
-------
TABLE 5-9
COMPARISON OF ASH EXTRACTS CONVENTIONAl ANALYSES (WITH LEACHATE CONVENTIONAL ANALYSES
MANGES Of CONCENTRATIONS
FACILITY ZO
Paramelei
Ammonia Distilled
(asN)
Total Organic Carbon
Chloride
Sulfate
Solids. Dissolved
(3> I80"C
total Alkalinity
Niliate(asN)
Orlhophospttdlt'
Lxtrad's Initial pH
Extract's Final pH
Samples (in mg/L)
COj Extracts
0 07-0 09
NA
39 7 77 2
336572
NA
NA
0 20 0 26
NO 006
4 SB 4 96
6426 71
Dl HjO Extracts
008-0 17
919-189
34 2-70 2
247 371
598842
201 288
003-0 18
NO
997 10 10
10 18 1044
EP IOX Extracts
0 12020
NA
43 5-82 2
197-629
NA
NA
003-0 16
NO 006
882-1020
496 5 IB
K.LP 1 Extracts
0 12-0 14
NA
839 109
360-703
NA
NA
0 03 0 07
001 O 04
4 85 4 95
5 69-6 34
rCLP2txlracts
0 16-0 20
NA
564 141
438872
NA
NA
001 0 12
0 48 1 66
3 16 3 55
4 10-441
SAR Extracts
3 56 4 1
994-197
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NO 001
9199 72
988 10 31
teachate
4 38 28 4
288307
NA
4.I40S.080
8,030 IJ.OOO
709 /44
NO 004
0 1/024
NA
NA
SlditddnJVCiiteria (in mg/l )
FP loxuily
Maximum
Allowabk-
Limit
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SdleOnnkiruj
Wjlei Aitl'l
MCLs
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
10
SNA
SNA
SNA
SateOnnkiny
Water Actd'l
SMCls
SNA
SNA
250
250
!>UO
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
LSI
I
en
NA Not analyzed due to differences in scope of work
NO Not Delected
SNA Standard Not Available
(a) Primary Drink ing Water Standards
(b) Secondary Drinking Watei Standards
-------
-------
6.0 FACILITY ZE FINDINGS
6.1 FACILITY ZE DESCRIPTION
Facility ZE consists of two mass-burn, water-wall boilers. Refuse is charged into the
boilers by overhead cranes, moves inside the boilers on grates, and is discharged into
ash quench reactors on the bottom of the boilers. Dry lime is added to the flue gas
where it is mixed with the fly ash. This mixture is then collected in electrostatic
precipitators and mixed in with the bottom ash for disposal. The steam generated at
the facility is used to generate electricity, which is sold to a local utility. The
following details outline the operational information for this facility.
Startup Date:
Refuse Feed Rate:
Operating Temperature:
Residence Time:
Backup Fuel:
Air Feed Information:
Refuse Feed Method:
Trash Accepted:
September 1987.
750 tons/day/boiler.
1,800°F.
Approximately 1 hour in the boiler, where the
grates can be slowed to allow wet loads more time
to dry out.
Natural gas-is used during start ups and shut downs
and if the boiler drops below 1,800° F.
Both primary and secondary air comes from the
tipping floor. Air is not normally preheated, but the
facility has the capability to preheat air.
Refuse is dumped onto the tipping floor, where
new refuse is mixed with the old refuse with an
overhead crane. Two cranes work during the hours
in which trucks are unloading. The pit at ZE is the
largest pit of any of the facilities studied; thus it is
easier for the crane operator(s) to keep areas open
for trucks to discharge. The overhead cranes load
the refuse into the feed hoppers on the boilers.
Any residential (65% of total) and commercial/light
industrial (35% of tptal) waste generated in
surrounding communities. Table 6-1 lists the
material accepted at this facility.
R339911
6-1
-------
Source of Ash Quench Water: Ash quench water consists of any water used in the
process (spray drier) and water used in other parts
of the plant.
Electricity Generated: 45 Megawatts/hour.
Electricity Used by Facility: 7 Megawatts/hour.
Ash-Handling Equipment
The bottom ash is discharged from the ash quench reactors onto a vibrating
conveyor. This conveyor dumps the ash onto an inclined conveyor. The inclined
conveyor discharges onto a grizzly, where large items (material greater than
10 inches) are separated out. The smaller material (material less than 10 inches)
passes through the grizzly and is discharged into ash bins for transportation to the
ash disposal facility.
Fly ash from the generator and the economizer areas is discharged into the ash
quench reactors, where it is mixed with the bottom ash. Fly ash from the spray drier
(where a lime slurry is injected into the flue gas) and the electrostatic precipitators is
transported to a drum, where water is added to the fly ash/lime mixture. This
mixture is then discharged onto the inclined conveyor and mixed with the bottom
ash.
The ash samples at Facility ZE were collected from the end of the inclined belt just
before the ash passed through the grizzly into the ash bins.
6.2 CHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF ASH
No Appendix IX semivolatiles were detected in sample ZE-AH-003, the only sample
from this facility analyzed for the Appendix IX semivolatiles. This sample did contain
98 ng/g (ppb) of dichlorobiphenyl (PCB). This was the only PCB cogener detected in
this sample.
Table 6-2 presents the results of the polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin and
polychlorinated dibenzofuran (PCDD/PCDF) analyses of sample ZE-AH-003. Toxicity
equivalency values were calculated using EPA's methodology (EPA, March 1987) and
are presented in this table. The data in this table indicate that the PCDDs/PCDFs
levels found in the ash are substantially below the Centers for Disease Control (CDC)
R339911 6-2
-------
recommended upper level of 2,3,7,8-TCDD toxicity equivalency of 1 part per billion
in residential soil (Kimbrough, 1984).
The results of the metals analyses for the ash from this facility are presented in
Table 6-3. The data in this table indicate that, except for chromium, mercury, and
zinc, the results were fairly constant during the week of sampling.
The results for the conventional analyses are presented in Table 6-4. The data in this
table indicate that, except for TOC, total soluble solids, ammonia, and total
alkalinity, the results were also fairly constant during the week.
6.3 CHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF LEACHATES
The facility used for the disposal of ash from MWC Facility ZE is lined and is used
exclusively for the disposal of ash from Facility ZE. The leachate samples from the
ash disposal facility for MWC Facility ZE were grab samples collected from the same
leachate collection sump.
The results for the semivolatile analysis of these samples are presented in Table 6-5.
As shown in this table only benzoic acid was detected in both samples; 73 ppb in one
sample and 52 ppb in the second.
No PCDDs/PCDFs or PCBs were detected in the leachate samples from this ash fill.
The results for the metals analysis of the leachate samples are shown in Table 6-6.
The data in this table indicate that none of the compounds exceeded their EP
Toxicity Maximum Allowable Limit. Although the leachates are not required to
meet Drinking Water Standards, a comparison of the leachate results with the
Primary and Secondary Drinking Water Standards established under the Safe
Drinking Water Act (EPA: BNA, June 1989 and EPA: BNA, October 1988) was made.
This comparison indicates that the results of all but barium, iron and manganese met
these standards in the leachates.
Table 6-7 presents the results of the conventional analyses of the leachate samples.
TDS values ranged from 25,900 mg/L to 26,300 mg/L, and the pH of the leachate
was 5.2.
R339911 6-3
-------
6.4 CHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF ASH EXTRACTS
No PCDDs/PCDFs or PCBs were detected in the composite sample from the deionized
water extracts of the ash from MWC Facility ZE.
Table 6-8 presents the results of the Appendix IX semivolatile analysis of the
composite sample from the deionized water extracts of the ash from MWC
Facility ZE. Benzoic acid (66 ppb) was the only Appendix IX semivolatile compound
detected in this composite sample. This table also indicates that benzoic acid (52 and
73 ppb) was the only Appendix IX semivolatile compound found in the leachate
samples from the ash fill serving this facility.
Table 6-9 presents the range of results of the metals analyses of the ash extracts from
MWC Facility ZE and the range of results for the leachate samples from the ash fill
serving this facility. For comparison, this table also lists the EP Toxicity Maximum
Allowable Limits, and the Primary and Secondary Drinking Water Standards
established under the Safe Drinking Water Act (EPA: BNA, June 1989 and EPA: SNA,
October 1988).
The results presented in Table 6-9 indicate that the extracts from the EP Toxicity and
the TCLP 2 extraction techniques generally contain higher concentrations of metals
than the extracts produced by the other extraction techniques.
For this facility, the extracts from the EP Toxicity and the TCLP 2 extraction
techniques exceeded the EP Toxicity Maximum Allowable Limits established in
Section 261.24 of 40 CFR 261 for lead.
Although the ash extracts would not be required to meet Drinking Water Standards,
a comparison of the ash extract results with the Drinking Water Standards was
made. This comparison indicates that the majority of the metals results met these
standards.
Table 6-10 presents the range of results of the conventional analyses of the ash
extracts from MWC Facility ZE and the leachate samples from the ash fill serving this
facility. For comparison, this table also lists the Primary Drinking Water Standards
for nitrate, as well as the Secondary Drinking Water Standards for chloride, sulfate,
and Total Dissolved Solids (TDS).
R339911 6-4
-------
TABLE 6-1
ACCEPTABLE WASTE
FACILITY ZE
Acceptable waste means household garbage, trash, rubbish and refuse.
Acceptable waste excludes: pathological and biological waste; oil sludge;
large concentrations of plastics; cesspool or other human waste; human and
animal remains; large automobile and vehicular parts; tires; trailers;
agricultural equipment; marine vessels or similar items; farm and other large
machinery; wire and cable; tree logs and wood greater than six (6) feet in
length and six (6) inches in diameter; tree stumps greater than
twelve (12) inches in diameter; liquid wastes; non-burnable construction
material and/or demolition debris; wallboard; asbestos and asbestos products;
explosives (including ammunition and firearms); chemicals (including any
empty containers thereof); radioactive materials and hazardous refuse of any
kind (including any empty containers thereof) such as cleaning fluids;
flammables; petroleum products (including drained oil); cutting oils; paints;
acids; caustics; pesticides; insecticides; poisons, drugs; or any other materials
that would be likely to cause the Facility to violate an air or water quality
effluent standard or to pose a threat to health or safety or which may cause
damage to or adversely affect the operation of the Facility.
R339911 6-5
-------
TABLE 6-2
ASH DIOXIN RESULTS - SAMPLE ZE-AH-003
FACILITYZE
PCDD/PCDF Homolog
2,3,7,8-TCDD
Other TCDD
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
Other PeCDD
1,2,3,4,7,8-HXCDD
1,2,3,6,7,8-HXCDO
1,2,3,7,8,9-HXCDD
Other HXCDD
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
Other HPCDD
OCDD
2,3,7,8-TCDF
Other TCDF
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
Other PeCDF
1,2,3,4,7,8-HXCDF
1,2,3,6,7,8-HXCDF
1,2,3,7,8,9-HXCDF
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
Other HXCDF
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
Other HpCDF
OCDF
Total Toxicity Equivalent
Ash Sample Result
pg/g
(Ppt)
10
120
35
248
11
11
22
104
122
0
294
176
1,136
52
43
448
95
134
45
20
280
155
16
44
59
Toxicity
Equivalency
Factor*1)
1.0
0.01
0.5
0.005
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.0004
0.001
0.00001
0
0.1
0.001
0.1
0.1
0.001
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.0001
0.001
0.001
0.00001
0
Toxicity
Equivalent
(Ppt)
10
1 2
175
1 24
044
0 44
088
0042
0 122
0
0
176
1 M
5 2
4 3
0448
095
1 34
045
0.20
0 028
0.155
0016
0.00044
0
63.7ppt
Toxicity equivalency factors are EPA's current recommended factors, (EPA,
March 1987).
R339911
6-6
-------
METALS
TABLE 6-3
ASH METALS ANALYSES
FACILITY ZE
Parameter
Samples
ZE-AH-001
ZE-AH-002
ZE-AH-003
ZE-AH-004
ZE-AH-005
(mg/kg)
(mg/kg)
(mg/kg)
(mg/kg)
(mg/kg)
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Iron
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Zinc
16
407
34
665
990
34,600
1,550
593
7.6
ND
4.4
6,750
8,280
17
491
35
71
1,300
43,000
1,380
640
4.7
ND
5.6
6,410
3,530
19
505
38
87
1,820
45,100
1,170
531
13
ND
5.4
7,500
3,600
15
391
37
67
1,500
40,200
1,170
598
4.8
4.7
13
5,880
3,400
20
792
18
70
930
33,900
1,600
581
3.2
ND
11
7,700
2,120
METAL OXIDES
Aluminum Oxide
Calcium Oxide
Magnesium Oxide
Potassium
Monoxide
Silicon Dioxide
11
15
2.0
1.2
31
9.7
14
1.6
1.2
31
10
13
1.9
1.4
35
10
14
1.8
0.95
30
10
13
1.6
1.0
32
ND Not Detected.
R339911
6-7
-------
TABLE 6-4
ASH CONVENTIONAL ANALYSES
FACILITY ZE
Parameter
pH
Moisture Content*
TOC
Total Soluble Solids
Ammonia
Nitrate
Orthophosphate
Total Alkalinity
Chloride
Sulfate
Units
S.U.
%
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
Samples
ZE-AH-001
11.61
2.5
34,000
22,900
5.05
2.90
NO
3,490
9,220
2,190
ZE-AH-002
11.69
1.9
8,920
25,900
3.64
3.19
ND
4,710
10,900
1,500
ZE-AH-003
11.71
1.4
4,060
35,500
8.69
4.51
ND
2,990
14,100
2,790
ZE-AH-004
11.40
1.3
7,290
26,100
7.32
4.10
ND
7,310
10,400
2,530
ZE-AH-005
11.82
0.6
43,300
11,200
2.77
4.23
ND
7,590
7,550
2,270
ND Not detected.
* Determined after samples were prepared.
R339911
6-8
-------
TABLE 6-5
LEACHATE SEMIVOLATILE ANALYSES
FACILITY ZE
Parameter
Benzoicaod
Sam pies (yg/L)
ZE-LE-001
73
ZE-LE-002
52
R339911
6-9
-------
TABLE 6-6
LEACHATE METALS ANALYSES
FACILITY ZE
Parameter
Aluminum
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Potassium
Selenium
Silicon
Silver
Sodium
Zinc
Samples (ug/L)
ZE-LE-001
ND
ND
3,080
ND
5,670,000
ND
ND
10,500
ND
14,800
17,100
ND
1,430,000
ND
498
ND
2,430,000
27
ZE-LE-002
ND
ND
2,970
ND
5,570,000
ND
ND
7,480
ND
15,000
18,500
ND
1,450,000
ND
470
ND
2,470,000
70
Standards/Criteria (ug/L)
EPToxicity
Maximum
Allowable Limit
SNA
5,000
100,000
1,000
SNA
5,000
SNA
SNA
5,000
SNA
SNA
200
SNA
1,000
SNA
5,000
SNA
SNA
Safe Drinking
Water Act
MCLs
SNA
50
1,000
10
SNA
50
SNA
SNA
50
SNA
SNA
2.0
SNA
10
SNA
50
SNA
SNA
Safe Drinking
Water Act)
SMCLs
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
1,000
300
SNA
SNA
50
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
5,000
ND Not detected.
SNA Standard Not Available.
(a) Primary Drinking Water Standards.
(b) Secondary Drinking Water Standards.
3339911
6-10
-------
TABLE 6-7
LEACHATE CONVENTIONAL ANALYSES
FACILITY ZE
Parameter
Ammonia-Distilled (as N)
Organic Carbon
Temperature (field)
Sulfate (SO4)
pH (field)
Solids, Dissolved @ 180°C
Specific Conductance @ 25"C
(field)
Total Alkalinity
Nitrate (as N)
Orthophosphate
Samples
ZE-LE-001
9.78 mg/L
28.9 mg/L
23°C
31 2 mg/L
5.2
26,300 mg/L
> 10,000
umhos/cm
95.2 mg/L
0.01 mg/L
<0.01 mg/L
ZE-LE-002
11. 4 mg/L
25.5 mg/L
NA
309 mg/L
NA
25,900 mg/L
NA
117 mg/L
0.01 mg/L
<0.01 mg/L
Standards/Criteria
Primary and Secondary
Drinking Water Quality
Standards
SNA
SNA
SNA
250 mg/L(b)
SNA
500 mg/Ub)
SNA
SNA
10mg/L(»>
SNA
NA Not analyzed a second time. Temperature, specific conductance and pH were only measured
once in the field.
SNA Standard Not Available.
(a) Primary Drinking Water Standards.
(b) Secondary Drinking Water Standards.
R339911
6-11
-------
TABLE 6-8
COMPARISON OF ASH EXTRACT SEMIVOLATILE RESULTS
TO LEACH ATE SEMIVOLATILE RESULTS
RANGES OF CONCENTRATIONS
FACILITY ZE
Parameter
Benzoic Acid
Samples (ug/L)
Deionized Water Extract
66T
Leachates
52-73
T The mass spectrum does not meet EPA CLP criteria for confirmation, but
compound presence is strongly suspected.
R339911
6-12
-------
TABLE 6-9
COMPARISON OF ASH EXTRACTS METALS ANAL VSES WITH LEACHATE METALS ANAL V SES
RANGES Of CONCENTRATIONS
FACILITY ZE
Parameter
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Iron
Lead
Sodium
Zinc
Aluminum Oxide
Calcium Oxide
Potassium Monoxide
Silicon Dioxide
Samples (in M«yO
CO; Extracts
ND
205 530
17 117
NO
76 274
NO 142
22-85
618-1.560
ND-63
ND
NO
64.40085,600
2.450-9.8SO
NO-52
914,000
1,200,000
36,900-47.800
38,000-57,700
19,800-32,400
01 H2O Extracts
ND
3554%
NO
NO
123-325
ND
ND
ND
ND-096
NO
ND
58.50082,700
20-91
4,570-47.400
343,000-
538,000
100-188
35,800-61,200
1,1703,990
if TOX Extracts
ND
173228
352-724
19-86
484-5.170
36,600-82.000
7.580-15,400
2,740-4.910
NO-0 65
ND
NO
66.200-83,600
48.000-82,400
46.800-150.000
1,920.000-
2,100.000
74.900-t03.000
37,300-69,800
46,800-65,700
TCLP 1 Extracts
ND
161 458
29 349
ND
5 119
ND
ND 169
364-4,060
ND
ND
ND
1, 400.000-
1.590.000
222-16.300
ND-159
1.340,000-
1,730.000
37,600-61,000
34,500-59,400
5,050-12,300
TCLP 2 Extracts
ND
222408
301 685
141 289
12 1.030
81.500 162.000
4,1108.840
3,070 3,970
0 27 2 1
ND
ND
66.800-86.200
36,900-82,700
104,000-
152.000
1.990,000-
2,200.000
89.000-116,000
35.500-64.400
120,000-
136.000
SAR Extracts
ND
302408
ND
NO
88-391
ND
ND-115
NO
022 1 0
NO
ND
53.20068.000
41-192
1.96050,500
352.000-
475.000
59M70
34.400-46.400
911-3.770
LeachaleW
ND
2.970-3.080
NO
ND
ND
7,480-10,500
ND
17.100 18,500
ND
NO
NO
2.430,000-
2,470,000
27-70
NO
5.570.000-
5,670,000
14,800 15,000
1,430,000
1.450,000
470-498
Standards/Criteria (in p
-------
TABLE 6-10
COMPARISON OF ASH EXTRACTS CONVENTIONAL ANAL VSES WITH LEACHATE CONVENTIONAL ANALYSES
RANGES OF CONCENTRATIONS
FACILITY ZE
Parameter
Ammonia Distilled
(asN)
Total Organic Carbon
Chloride
Sulfdle
Solids. Dissolved
IS I80"C
I otal Alkalinity
Nitrate (as N)
Orthophosphale
Extract's Initial pH
Extract's Final pH
Samples (in mg/L)
CO., Extracts
0 24-0 38
NA
341-709
635-919
NA
NA
0 39-1 23
NO
4 72-5 IB
677-7 17
DIHjO Extracts
0 20-0 46
163-233
317702
140-190
1.120 1.690
162234
008-017
NO
11 27-11 52
1099 11 SO
EPTOX Extracts
0 36-0 61
NA
328583
719926
NA
NA
0 17-0 22
0 12-1 04
11 04-11 32
4 95 5 09
TCLP 1 Extracts
021 046
NA
342-818
891-1,230
NA
NA
0 11-021
ND 0 02
501 508
7 10-8 18
TCLP 2 Extracts
0 2b-0 SO
NA
334-693
883-1.090
NA
NA
013018
0/51 99
3 42 3 60
451 463
SAR Extracts
3 724 1 1
149249
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NO
II 37 11 75
10 87 11 38
Leachate
978 11 4
25 5-28 9
NA
309 312
25,900-26,300
95 2-1 1/
001
NO
NA
NA
Slaridards/Critvf iu(m mg/L)
EPToxicity
Maximum
Allowable
Limit
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
Safe Drinking
Wdloi Acl>>
SMCLi
SNA
SNA
250
250
500
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
NA Not analyzed due to differences in scope of work
NO Not Detected
SNA Standard Nul Available
(a) Primary Drinking Water Standards
(b) Secondai y Drinking Water Standards
-------
-------
7.0 SUMMARY OF RESULTS
This section presents a summary of the data presented in Sections 2.0 through 6.0. It
also compares the data generated during this present study with data reported in a
previous EPA sponsored study (EPA, October 1987).
7.1 CHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF ASH
Table 7-1 presents the results of the Appendix IX semivolatile analyses for the ash
samples from each facility. The data in this table indicate that phthalates were
found in the ash samples from each MWC facility, except for Facility ZE, and that two
PAHs were detected in the ash from Facility ZD.
Table 7-2 compares the range of concentrations of semivolatile compounds found in
the combined fly/bottom ash from this study with the range of concentrations found
in fly ash, and bottom ash reported in the literature, as summarized in a previous
report (EPA, October 1987). The data in this table indicate that fewer compounds
were found in the ash during this present study as compared to the data provided in
the literature. The concentrations of the compounds which were found in this study
are generally similar to those reported in the literature.
Table 7-3 presents the results of the PCDD/PCDF analyses of the ash samples from
each facility. This table also presents the Toxicity Equivalency Factor (TEF) for each
PCDD/PCDF homolog, the Toxicity Equivalency (TE) for each homolog calculated
according to EPA's Methodology (EPA, March 1987), and a Total TE for each sample.
Although PCDDs/PCDFs were detected in each ash sample, the levels found were
below the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) recommended upper level of
2,3,7,8-TCDD Toxicity Equivalency of 1 part per billion in residential soils
(Kimbrough, 1984).
Table 7-4 compares the ranges of concentrations of PCDDs/PCDFs found in ash
samples during this study with the ranges of concentrations of PCDDs/PCDFs
reported in the literature and summarized in a previous report (EPA, October 1987).
The data in this table indicate that the levels of PCDDs/PCDFs found in the ash during
R339911 7-1
-------
this present study are generally lower than the range of PCDDs/PCDFs found in other
ash samples, as reported in the literature.
i
Table 7-4 also presents the range of concentrations of PCBs in fly ash, bottom ash,
and combined ash. The data in this table indicate that only Dichloro Biphenyl was
found in the ash during this present study.
Table 7-5 presents the range of results of the metals analyses for the ash from each
facility. Metals showing the widest range of concentration among samples collected
at each facility included barium (ZB); cadmium (ZB); chromium (ZD, ZE); copper (ZA,
ZB, ZC); lead (ZD); manganese (ZA, ZC); mercury (ZE); zinc (ZB, ZD, ZE) and silicon
dioxide (ZA).
Metals showing the widest variation of concentrations between the facilities
included barium (results for Facility ZC are lower than the results for the other
facilities); iron (results for each facility vary from all of the other facilities); lead
(results for Facility ZD are higher than the results for the other facilities); mercury
(results for Facilities ZC and ZD are lower than the results for the other facilities);
sodium (results for Facilities ZD and ZE are lower than the results for the other
facilities); calcium oxide (the results for Facilities ZA and ZB are higher than the
results for the other facilities); and silicon dioxide (the results for Facility ZC are
higher than the results for the other facilities).
Table 7-6 compares the ranges of concentrations of metals found in the ash during
this study with the ranges of concentrations of metals found in fly ash, bottom ash,
and combined ash as reported in the literature and summarized in a previous report
(EPA, October 1987). The data in this table indicate that the results obtained during
this study are generally similar to the previous results.
Several compounds (aluminum, cadmium, calcium, mercury, and potassium)
exhibited higher levels during this study than those reported previously for
combined ash. The levels of copper found during this study are higher than the
results reported previously for combined ash, but are still lower than the results
reported previously for bottom ash. The magnesium results reported in this study
are higher than the results reported previously for all three types of ash. However,
the results for magnesium are close to those previously reported. The levels of
R339911 7-2
-------
silicon found in the ash during this study are much higher than the levels found in
previous studies.
Table 7-7 presents the range of results of the conventional analyses for the ash from
each facility. Compounds showing the widest range of values between samples at
each facility included TOC (ZA, ZB, ZD, ZE); ammonia (ZA, ZB, ZE); nitrate (ZC, ZD);
total alkalinity (ZB, ZC, ZE); chloride (ZB, ZD); sulfate (ZB, ZD); and total soluble
solids (ZE).
Compounds showing the widest variation between facilities included TOC (results
for Facilities ZD andZE are higher than the results for the other facilities); total
soluble salts (results for Facilities ZA and ZB are higher than the results for the other
facilities); ammonia (results for Facilities ZC and ZD are lower than the results for the
other facilities); total alkalinity (results for Facility ZA are higher than the results for
the other facilities); chloride (results for Facilities ZA andZB are higher than the
results for the other facilities); and sulfate (results for Facility ZC are higher than the
results for the other facilities).
7.2 CHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF LEACHATES
Table 7-8 presents the range of results of the Appendix IX semivolatile analyses for
the leachate samples from each facility. The data in this table indicate that phenols
were detected in the leachate from the ashfill serving MWC Facility ZA and that
benzoic acid was detected in the leachate from the ashfill serving MWC Facility ZE.
Table 7-9 compares the ranges of concentrations of the semivolatile compounds
found in the leachates in this study with the ranges of concentrations of organic
compounds reported in the literature and summarized in a previous report (EPA,
October 1987). The data in this table indicate that very few semivolatile compounds
were found in the leachates during this study. The levels of phenol detected in the
leachates during this study are much lower than the levels of phenol found in the
leachates from the MSW landfills or co-disposal sites.
Table 7-10 presents the range of concentrations of PCDDs/PCDFs found in the
leachate samples from each facility. PCDDs/PCDFs were only found at extremely low
levels in the leachates from the ashfill for Facility ZA.
R339911 7-3
-------
Table 7-11 compares the ranges of concentrations of PCDDs/PCDFs found in the
leachates during this study with the ranges of concentrations of PCDDs/PCDFs found
in leachates during a previous study (EPA, October 1987). The data in this table
indicate that the leachates did not contain significant quantities of PCDDs/PCDFs.
The data in this table also indicate that the homologs most often found in leachates
from ash monofills are the more highly chlorinated homologs (HpCDD, HpCDF,
OCDD, OCDF) which are also the homologs with the relatively lower Toxicity
Equivalency Factors (TEFs).
Table 7-12 presents the results of the metals analyses of the leachate from each
facility. For comparison, this table also presents the EP Toxicity Maximum Allowable
Limit, and the Primary and Secondary Drinking Water standards established under
the Safe Drinking Water Act (EPA: BNA, June 1989 and EPA: BNA, October 1988).
The data in this table indicate that all of the metals were below their EP Toxicity
Maximum Allowable Limit. The data in this table also indicate that, although the
leachates are not used for drinking purposes, the majority of the metals results met
the Primary or Secondary Drinking Water Standards.
Table 7-13 compares the ranges of concentrations of metals in the leachates from
this study with the ranges of concentrations of metals in leachates found in the
literature and summarized in a previous NUS report (EPA, October 1987). The data in
this table indicate that the EP Toxicity Maximum Allowable Limits were not
exceeded by the leachates from ash monofills in either this study or in the previous
NUS report. The data in this table also indicate that a number of compounds are
reported as having higher concentrations in the leachates from this study than the
leachates from the previous study.
Table 7-14 presents the range of results of the conventional analyses for the leachate
from each facility. Sulfate values ranged from 14.4 mg/L to 5,080 mg/L, and TDS
values ranged from 924 mg/L to 41,000 mg/L.
7.3 CHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF ASH EXTRACTS
The only Appendix IX semivolatile compound detected in the deionized water
extracts (SW-924) was benzoic acid, which ranged from below the detection limits to
130yg/L. Table 7-15 compares the ranges of concentrations of semivolatile
compounds found in the deionized water ash extracts (SW-924) during this study
R339911 7-4
-------
with the ranges of concentrations of organics found in ash extracts from a previous
report (EPA, October 1987). All studies show that MWC ash extracts are generally
free of semivolatile compounds.
Table 7-16 compares the ranges of concentrations of the metals analyses of the ash
extracts found during this study with the ranges of concentrations of metals analyses
of extracts as reported in the literature and summarized in a previous NUS report
(EPA, October 1987). The data in this table indicate that the extracts from the
EPToxicity, the TCLP 1, and the TCLP2 extraction procedures contained generally
higher levels of metals than the extracts from the other extraction procedures.
The data in this table also indicate that the extracts from the deionized water
extraction procedure (SW-924), both from this study and from the literature, and the
extracts from the CO2 and the SAR extraction procedures meet the EP Toxicity
Allowable Limits. The extracts from the EP Toxicity, TCLP1, and the TCLP 2
extraction procedures occasionally exceeded the EP Toxicity Maximum Allowable
Limits for some metals.
For the facilities sampled during this study, the data indicate that the extracts from
the deionized water (SW-924), the C02, and the SAR extraction procedures
simulated the concentrations for lead and cadmium in the field leachates better
than the extracts from the other three extraction procedures.
R339911 7-5
-------
TABLE 7-1
COMPARISON OF ASH SEMIVOLATILE RESULTS
Parameter
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)
phthalate
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Fluoranthene
Phenanthrene
Samples (vg/kg)
ZA-AH-003
250,000
2,OOOT
430JB
ND
ND
ZB-AH-001
810JB
ND
ND
ND
ND
ZC-AH-003
310JB
ND
400JB
ND
ND
ZD-AH-003
390JB
ND
270JB,
170J
310J
ZE-AH-003
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND Not detected.
J Indicates approximate value because contaminants were detected at levels below Method
Detection Limits, but above the instrument detection limits.
B Laboratory identified compound as not being detected substantially above the level reported
in laboratory blanks. Laboratory may be the source of the compound.
81 Compound was identified during data validation as not being detected substantially above
the level reported in the laboratory blanks. Laboratory may be the source of the
contamination.
T The mass spectrum does not meet EPA CLP criteria for confirmation, but compound presence is
strongly suspected.
R339911
7-6
-------
TABLE 7-2
RANGES OF CONCENTRATIONS OF SEMIVOLAT1LES IN FLY ASH, BOTTOM ASH,
AND COMBINED ASH FROM MUNICIPAL WASTE INCINERATORS
Constituent
Naphthalene
Biphenyl
Acenaphthylene
Anthracene
Fluorene
Phenanthrene
Oi-n-butyl phthalate
Fluoranthene
Pyrene
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Chrysene
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
Benzanthrene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Benzo(a)pyrene
8enzo(g,h,i)perylene
Diethyl phthalate
Acenaphthene
Normal alkanes
Chlorobenzenes
Chlorophenols
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Country
Range,
Fly Ash
(ppb)
270-9,300
2-1,300
ND-3,500
1-500
0-100
21-7,600
NO
0-6,500
0-5,400
ND
0-690
85
0-300
N 0-470
ND-400
0-190
6,300
NR
50,000
80-4,220
50.1-9,630
NR
USA, Canada, Japan
and The Netherlands
Range,
Bottom Ash
(ppb)
570-580
NR
37-390
53
ND-150
500-540
360
110-230
150-220
180
ND-37
2,100
NR
ND-51
ND-5
ND
NR
28
NR
17
0
NR
USA and Canada
Range,
Combined Ash
(ppb)
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
N.D-310J
ND-430JB
ND-170J
ND
ND
ND
NO-250,000
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND-2.000T
USA
ND Not detected.
N R N ot reported i n the I i teratu re.
J Indicates approximate value because contaminants were detected at levels below Method
Detection Limits, but above the instrument detection limits.
B Laboratory identified compound as not being detected substantially above the level reported
in laboratory blanks. Laboratory may be the source of the compound.
T The mass spectrum does not meet EPA CLP criteria for confirmation, but compound presence
is strongly suspected.
Source: Fly ash and bottom ash ranges are from "Characterization of MWC Ashes and Leachates
from MSW Landfills, Monofills, and Co-Disposal Sites," EPA 530-SW-87-028A,
October 1987. Combined Ash ranges are^ from this study.
R339911
7-7
-------
TABLE 7-3
ASH DIOXIN RESULTS
Compound
2,3.7,8-TCDD
Other KDO
2.3.7.8TCDF
Other TCDF
1,2 3.7,8 PeCDD
Other PeCDO
1 2 3,7.8 PeCDF
2 3 4 7,8 PeCDF
Olhef HeCDF
123478 HxCDD
1236 78 HxCDD
12378 9-H«CDD
Other HxCOO
1,2. 3.4, /.8 HxCDF
1.2,3,6.7.8 HxCDF
1.2,3.7,8.9 HxCDF
2,3,4.6,7,8 HxCDF
Other HxCOF
1 2 34.6 /.B. HpCDD
Other HpCDO
1 2,3.4,6.7.8 HpCDF
\ 1 3 4 / 8,9 HpCDF
Oilier HpCDf
OCDD
OCDF
Total TF.S
Toxicity
Equivalency
Factor (1EF)0
1
001
0 1
0001
05
0005
0 1
0 1
0001
004
004
004
00004
001
001
001
001
00001
0001
0 00001
0001
0001
000001
0
0
Samples (p9/g or ppt)
ZA-AH-003
Value
10
206
263
1,688
33
317
61
46
484
12
17
28
154
74
1 '31 1
1 36 1
1 5 1
[ 281 1
159
139
8
51
313
66
Toxicily
Equivalents
10
206
263
169
165
1 59
6 1
46
0484
048
068
1 12
0062
074
1 31
o~36
005
00281
0 159
0 139
0008
000051
0
0
745
ZB-AH 001
Value
24
351
617
3,721
118
759
194
162
1.527
40
34
79
342
336
524
127
54
939
319
-)aa
539
48
197
544
243
Toxicity
Equivalents
24
3 51
61 7
372
59
380
194
162
1 53
1 6
1 36
3 16
0 137
Ttt
524
0 54
00939
0319
0 00288
0539
0048
000197
0
0
211
ZC AH-003
Value
16
281
236
1,208
71
1.051
64
56
607
66
90
120
925
275
279
193
70
635
1.849
1 511
653
83
254
6.906
563
Tuxicity
Equivalents
16
281
236
TTi
35 5
526
56
0607
264
36
48
0 37
m
2~79
T<»3
0 0635
Tss
00151
0653
0083
0 00254
0
0
119
?O-AH 003
Value
35
541
626
2,633
ND
1.910
151
171
1.736
86
148
194
853
6V1
1,384
1,842
119
384
4,519
893
Toxicily
Equivalents
35
541
626
263
0
955
17 1
1 74
5 92
7 76
00138
1 84
0 119
0 003B4
0
0
189
ZE AH 003
Value
176
248
0
155
16
44
294
59
loxicity
Equivalents
0
0 155
OOtb
0 00044
0
0
bl 7
oo
(1) Toxicicty Equivalency Factors are EPA's current
ND Not delected below 221 pg/g
recommended factors (EPA, March 1987)
-------
TABLE 7-4
RANGES OF CONCENTRATIONS OF PCDDs, PCDFs, and PCBs IN FLY ASH, BOTTOM ASH, AND
COMBINED ASH FROM MUNICIPAL WASTE INCINERATORS
Constituent
MonoCDD
DiCDD
Tri CDD
Tetra CDD
Penta CDD
Hexa CDD
Hepta CDD
Octa CDD
2,3,7,8-TCDD
Total Poly CDD
Mono CDF
DiCDF
Tri CDF
Tetra CDF
Penta CDF
Hexa CDF
Hepta CDF
Octa CDF
2,3,7,8-TCDF
Total Poly CDF
Range,
Fly Ash
(ppb)
2.0
0.4-200
1.1-82
ND-250
ND-722
ND-5,565
ND-3,030
ND-3,152
0.1-42
5.23-10,883
41
ND-90
0.7-550
ND-410
ND- 1,800
Tr-2,353
Tr-666
ND-362
0.1-5.4
3.73-3,187
Range,
Combined Ash
(Literature)
(ppb)
NR
NR
NR
0.14-14
1.9-50
1.4-78
1.4-120
0.84-89
0.02-0.78
6.2-350
NR
NR
NR
2.3-91
1 .6-37
1.2-35
0.62-36
0.18-8.4
0.41-12
6.14-153.9
Range,
Bottom Ash
(ppb)
ND
ND
ND
<0.04-0.65
ND-3
ND-2.3
ND-6.3
ND-29
<0.04-0.7
ND-110
1.1
0.63
ND
0.15-1.4
0.07-6.2
ND-2.5
ND-6.9
ND-3.7
ND-10
ND-65
Range,
Combined Ash
(CORRE)
(ppb)
NA
NA
NA
0 130-0.576
0283-1.91
0.148-1.28
0.122-3.36
0 294-6.91
0.010-0.035
RNR
NA
NA
NA
1 31-4.34
0.543-2.06
0.527-3.6
0.198-2.345
0.059-0.893
0 176-0.626
RNR
R339911
7-9
-------
TABLE 7-4
RANGES OF CONCENTRATIONS OF PCDDs, PCDFs, and PCBs
FROM MUNICIPAL WASTE INCINERATORS (ppb)
PAGE TWO
Constituent
MonoCB
DiCB
TriCB
Tetra CB
Penta CB
Hexa CB
Hepta CB
Octa CB
Nona CB
Deca CB
Total PCB
Country
Range,
Fly Ash
(ppb)
0.29-9.5
0.13-9.9
ND-25
0.5-42
0.87-225
0.45-65
ND-0.1
ND-1.2
ND
ND
ND-250
USA, Canada,
W. Germany,
The Netherlands,
Japan
Range,
Combined Ash
(Literature)
(ppb)
ND
0.126-1.35
0.35-14.3
16.5-16.5
ND
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
ND-32.15
USA
Range,
Bottom Ash
(ppb)
ND-1.3
ND-5.5
ND-80
ND-47
ND-48
ND-39
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND-180
USA, Canada,
Japan
Range,
Combined Ash
(CORRE)
(ppb)
ND
98-107
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
USA
NA Not analyzed.
ND Not detected.
NR Not reported in the literature.
RNR Results not reported in this manner. 2,3,7,8-TCDD toxicity equivalents were calculated
and are reported in Table 7-3.
Tr = 0.01
-------
TABLE 7-5
ASH METALS ANALYSES
RANGES OF CONCENTRATIONS
Parameter
Samples
ZA-AH-001 -
ZA-AH-005
ZB-AH-001 -
ZB-AH-005
ZC-AH-001 -
ZC-AH-005
ZD-AH-001 -
ZD-AH-005
ZE-AH-001-
ZE-AH-005
METALS
(mg/kg)
(mg/kg)
(mg/kg)
(mg/kg)
(mg/kg)
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Iron
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Zinc
37-51
436-554
32-56
55-93
946-7,360
44,100-
63,300
1,180-
1,820
587-1,360
10.4-25.1
ND
4.1-8.7
9,350-
11,000
4,310-
6,900
28-56
260-1,000
52-152
53-118
674-9,330
13,600-
22,200
1,070-
1,740
508-846
7.7-12
ND-5.7
5.4-10.0
8,200-
10,600
4,360-
1 5,800
28-36
193-331
42-52
45-57
524-4,470
20,000-
25,000
1,710-
2,630
518-1,200
1.1-3.2
ND
5.6-12
7,370-
8,940
4,110-
7,170
30-54
411-545
39-69
52-199
959-1,800
22,900-
37,100
2,860-
22,400
574-965
0.55-2.10
ND-3.9
6.3-11.0
5,890-
6,500
4,260-
8,000
15-20
391-792
18-38
67-665
930-1,820
33,900-
45,100
1,170-
1,600
531-640
3 2-13.0
ND-47
44-130
5,880-
7,770
2,120-
8,280
METAL OXIDES
Aluminum Oxide
Calcium Oxide
Magnesium Oxide
Potassium Monoxide
Silicon Dioxide
8.52-9.85
15.1-22.2
1.21-1.50
1.10-1.24
21.9-43.8
7.39-10.3
19.4-25.7
1.19-1.62
0.827-0.941
19.0-29.4
5.93-8.64
9.70-11.4
1.02-1.30
0.875-1.07
48.4-62.9
9.9-13.0
10.0-12.0
1.8-2.2
0.79-1.4
32.0-37.0
97-110
13 0-150
1 6-2.0
0.95-1 4
30-35
ND Not Detected.
R339911
7-11
-------
TABLE 7-6
RANGES OF CONCENTRATIONS OF INORGANIC CONSTITUENTS
IN FLY ASH, COMBINED ASH, AND BOTTOM ASH
FROM MUNICIPAL WASTE INCINERATORS
Parameter
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Lead
Mercury
Selenium
Silver
Aluminum
Antimony
Beryllium
Bismuth
Boron
Bromine
Calcium
Cesium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lithium
Magnesium
Manganese
Molybdenum
Nickel
Fly Ash
(ppm)
15-750
88-9,000
< 5-2,2 10
21-1,900
200-26,600
0.9-35
0.48-15.6
ND-700
5,300-176,000
139-760
ND-<4
36- < 100
35-5,654
21-250
13,960-270,000
2,100-12,000
2.3-1,670
187-2,380
900-87,000
7.9-34
2,150-21,000
171-8,500
9.2-700
9.9-1,966
Combined Bottom
and Fly Ash
(Literature)
(ppm)
2.9-50
79-2,700
0.18-100
12-1,500
31-36,600
0.05-17.5
0.10-50
0.05-93.4
5,000-60,000
<120-<260
0.1-2.4
NR
24-174
NR
4,100-85,000
NR
1.7-91
40-5,900
690-133,500
6.9-37
700-16,000
14-3,130
2.4-290
13-12,910
Bottom Ash
(ppm)
1.3-24.6
47-2,000
1.1-46
13-520
110-5,000
ND-1.9
ND-2.5
ND-38
5,400-53,400
NR
ND-<0.44
ND
85
NR
5,900-69,500
NR
3-62
80-10,700
1,000-133,500
7-19
880-10,100
50-3,100
29
9-226
Combined Bottom
and Fly Ash
(CORRE)
(ppm)
15-56
193-1,000
18-152
45-665
1,070-22,400
0 55-25.1
ND-5.7
4 1-13.0
593-1300)
NA
NA
NA
MA
NA
97-257(1)
NA
NA
524-9,330
13,600-63,300
NA
1 02-2.20)
508-1,360
NA
NA
R339911
7-12
-------
TABLE 7-6
RANGES OF CONCENTRATIONS OF INORGANIC CONSTITUENTS
IN FLY ASH, COMBINED ASH, AND BOTTOM ASH
FROM MUNICIPAL WASTE INCINERATORS
PAGE TWO
Parameter
Phosphorus
Potassium
Silicon
Sodium
Strontium
Tin
Titanium
Vanadium
Yttrium
Zinc
Gold
Chloride
Country
Fly Ash
(ppm)
2,900-9,300
11,000-65,800
1,783-266,000
9,780-49,500
98-1,100
300-12,500
< 50-42,000
22-166
,2-380
2,800-152,000
0.16-100
1,160-11,200
USA, Canada
Combined Bottom
and Fly Ash
(Literature)
(ppm)
290-5,000
290-12,000
NR
1,100-33,300
12-640
13-380
1,000-28,000
13-150
0.55-8.3
92-46,000
NR
NR
USA
Bottom Ash
(ppm)
3,400-17,800
920-13,133
1,333-188,300
1,800-33,300
81-240
40-800
3,067-11,400
53
NR
200-12,400
NR
NR
USA, Canada
Combined Bottom
and Fly Ash
(CORRE)
(ppm)
NA
0.79-1.40)
19.0-62.9(1>
5,880-11,000
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
2,120-15,800
NA
766-44,200
USA
(1> Results are for oxides and are expressed as percents.
NA Not analyzed, as it was not part of the scope of work for this project.
ND Not detected.
NR Not reported in the literature.
Source: The results in the first three columns are from "Characterization of
Leachates from MWS Landfills, Monofills, and Co-Disposal Sites," EPA
October 1987. The results in the last column are from this study.
MWC Ashes and
530-SW-87-028A,
R339911
7-13
-------
TABLE 7-7
ASH CONVENTIONAL ANALYSES
RANGES OF CONCENTRATIONS
Parameter
Ammonia-Distilled
(asN)
Total Organic Carbon
Chloride
Sulfate
Solids, Dissolved
@180°C
Total Alkalinity
Nitrate (as N)
Orthophosphate
PH
Samples (mg/kg)
ZA-AH-001-
ZA-AH-005
2.89-11.5
1 1 ,400-
35,600
16,300-
23,700
3,770-
6,100
46,500-
52,400
7,540-
8,100
2.22-4.23
NO
11.68-11.85
ZB-AH-001-
ZB-AH-005
3.69-10.6
14,600-
29,600
18,600-
44,200
764-
3,130
36,700-
65,800
1,590-
6,650
1.45-2.87
ND
10.91-11.67
ZC-AH-001-
ZC-AH-005
1.33-2.10
9,020-
17,800
3,870-
5,860
5,900-
10,300
22,000-
26,100
1,210-
3,040
0.09-6.46
ND
11.58-11.82
ZD-AH-001-
ZD-AH-005
0.90-1.08
11,400-
53,200
766-
2,190
1,680-
5,580
6,440-
13,200
558-922
0.44-1.59
ND-0.05
10.36-10.69
ZE-AH-001-
ZE-AH-005
2.77-8.69
4,060-
43,300
7,550-
14,100
1,500-
2,790
11,200-
35,500
2,990-
7,590
2.9-4.51
ND
11.4-11.82
ND Not Detected.
R339911
7-14
-------
TABLE 7-8
LEACHATE SEMI VOLATILE RESULTS
RANGES OF CONCENTRATIONS
Parameter
Benzole acid
Phenol
3-Methyl phenol
4-Methyl phenol
Samples (yg/L)
ZA-LE-001-
ZA-LE-007
ND
2J-32
ND-6J
ND-6J
ZB-LE-001
ND
ND
ND
ND
ZC-LE-001-
ZC-LE-002
ND
ND
ND
ND
ZD-LE-001-
ZD-LE-003
ND
ND
ND
ND
ZE-LE-001-
ZE-LE-002
52-73
ND
ND
ND
ND Not Detected.
J Indicates approximate value because contaminants were detected at levels below Method
Detection Limits, but above the instrument detection limit.
R339911
7-15
-------
TABLE 7-9
CONCENTRATIONS OF ORGANIC CONSTITUENTS IN LEACHATE
FROM MUNICIPAL WASTE LANDFILLS, ASH MONOFILLS, AND CO-DISPOSAL SITES
Constituent
Acetone
Benzene
Benzoic Acid
Bromomethane
1-Butanol
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
Bis(2-ch!oroethoxy)methane
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Delta BHC
Dibromomethane
1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene
Dichlorodifluoromethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
Cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
Trans- 1,2-Dichloroethene
Dichloromethane
1 ,2-Dichloropropane
Di ethyl phthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Endrin
Ethyl acetate
Ethyl benzene
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
Range
(Literature)
(vg/U
140-11,000
2-6,080
NR
10-170
50-360
2-398
2-237
5-860
2-25
2-1,300
10-170
0-5
5-25
2-37
10-450
2-6,300
0-11,000
4-190
4-2,760
2-3,300
2-100
2-330
4-55
4-150
0-1
5-50
5-4,900
6-150
NUS
Municipal
(M9/L)
4-4,600
NO
NR
NO
ND
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND-16
ND
ND
ND
ND-230
ND
ND
ND-23
ND
ND
ND
ND
NUS
Codisposal
(ug/L)
ND- 1,500
ND
NR
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND-250
ND
ND-15
ND
Ash Monofill
(CORRE)
(ug/L)
NA
NA
ND-73
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
ND
NA
NA
NA
NA
ND
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
ND
ND
ND
NA
NA
NA
ND
R339911
7-16
-------
TABLE 7-9
CONCENTRATIONS OF ORGANIC CONSTITUENTS IN LEACHATE
FROM MUNICIPAL WASTE LANDFILLS, ASH MONOFILLS, AND CO-DISPOSAL SITES
PAGE TWO
Constituent
Isophorene
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methyl isobutyl ketone
3-Methyl phenol
4-Methylphenol
Napthalene
Nitrobenzene
4-Nitrophenol
Pentachlorophenol
Phenol
2-Propanol
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Tetrahydrofuran
Toluene
Toxaphene
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
1 , 1 ,2-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethene
Trichlorofluoromethane
Vinyl chloride
m-Xylene
p-Xylene and o-Xylene
Range
(Literature)
(ug/L)
10-16,000
110-28,000
10-660
NR
NR
4-68
2-120
17-40
3-470
10-28,800
94-10,000
7-210
2-620
5-260
2-3,200
0-5
0-2,400
2-500
1-1,120
4-100
0-110
21-79
12-50
NUS
Municipal
(ug/L)
ND
290-12,000
ND
NR
NR
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND-2,100
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND-1,100
ND-16
ND
ND
ND
ND-230
ND
ND
ND-23
NUS
Codisposal
(ug/L)
ND
ND-2,200
ND
NR
NR
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND-2,100
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND-120
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND-290
Ash Monofill
(CORRE)
(ug/L)
ND
NA
NA
ND-6J
ND-6J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND-32
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA Not analyzed, as it was not part of the scope of work for this study.
NR Not reported in the literature.
ND Not detected.
J Indicates approximate value because contaminants were detected at levels below Method
Detection Limits, but above the instrument detection limit.
Source: The first three columns are from "Characterization of MWC Ashes and Leachates From
MSW Landfills, Monofills, and Co-Disposal Sites," EPA, October 1987. The last column is
from this study.
R339911
7-17
-------
TABLE 7-10
LEACHATE DIOXIN RESULTS
RANGES OF CONCENTRATIONS
Parameter
2,3,7,8-TCDD
TCDD-TOT
PeCDD
HXCDD
HPCDD
OCDD
2,3,7,8-TCDF
TCDF-TOT
PeCDF
HXCDF
HPCDF
OCDF
2,3,7,8-TCDDO>
Equivalency ppb
Samples (ppb)
ZA-LE-001-
ZA-LE-007
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND-0.222
ND-0.107
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND-0.076
ND
2x10-4
ZB-LE-001
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ZC-LE-001-
ZC-LE-002
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ZD-LE-001-
ZD-LE-003
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ZE-LE-001-
ZE-LE-002
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND Not Detected.
<1> 2,3,7,8-TCDD equivalency calculated using Toxicity Equivalency Factors currently
recommended by EPA (EPA, March 1987).
R339911
7-18
-------
TABLE 7-11
CONCENTRATIONS OF PCDOs/PCDFs IN LEACHATES FROM ASH MONOFILLS
RANGES OF CONCENTRATIONS
Compound
2,3,7,8-TCDD
Total TCDD
Total PeCDD
Total HXCDD
Total HpCDD
Total OCDO
Total Dioxin
2,3,7,8-TCDF
Total TCDF
Total PeCDF
Total HXCDF
Total HpCDF
Total OCDF
Total Furan
2,3,7,8-TCDD (D
Equivalency
(yg/kg or ug/L)
Field Leachate
Monofill B
(ppb)
<0.06-0.28
<0.06-6.6
<0.05-25
< 0.02-22
0.009-21
0.14-14
0.149-88.6
<0.05-3.7
<0.05-22
< 0.02- 17
<0.01-16
0.05-9.4
0.05-1.9
0.1-66.3
0.000-0.037
Field Leachate
Monofill C
(ppb)
<0.05-1.6
< 0.05-28
< 0.03-93
<0.02-130
<0.02-172
0.06-120
0.06-543
< 0.08- 11
< 0.08-65
< 0.02-64
<0.01-76
< 0.03-60
0.04-15
0.04-280
0.000-0.062
Field Leachate
Monofill D
(ppb)
<0.22-<0.26
0.13-0.27
<0.22-0.4
2.1-2.2
8.2-8.8
23-25
33.93-36.17
0.37-0.4
2.9-3
2.3-2.4
1.9-1.9
1.2-1.3
0.81-0.84
9.21-9.34
0.000-0.001
Field Leachate
Facility ZA
(ppb)
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND-0222
ND-0 107
NR
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND-0 076
ND
NR
2x 10-4
ND Not detected.
NR Not reported, since the results were reported in another fashion.
0) 2,3,7,8-TCDD equivalency calculuated using Toxicity Equivalency Factors currently
recommended by EPA (EPA, March 1987).
Source: The results for Monofill B, Monofill C, and Monofill D are from "Characterization
of MWC Ashes and Leachates from MSW Landfills, Monofills and Co-Disposal
Sites," EPA, October 1987. The results from Facility ZA are from this study.
R339911
7-19
-------
TABLE 7- 12
LEACHATE METALS ANALYSES
RANGES OF CONCENTRATIONS
Parameter
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Iron
lead
Manganese
Mercury
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Zinc
Aluminum
Calcium
Magnesium
Potassium
Silicon
ZA LE 001-
ZALE-007
47-400
ND
NO 1 7
ND-32
ND
120 3.400
8-54
3104.600
ND
24-340
NO
3,000,000-3,800,000
60 370
700920
3,270,0005.360.000
51,000 70,000
516,000 525,000
2,100 5.700
Samples (in ug/L)
ZB-LE-001
NO
9,220
40
ND
88
840
ND
17,600
ND
ND
ND
2,450,000
83
ND
8,390,000
17,300
1,620,000
3,150
ZC LE 001
ZCLE-002
ND
7880
ND
ND
ND
108-115
ND 34
493 501
ND
ND
ND
188,000 191,000
9 13
ND
64.60065.800
22,60023,000
79.70081,200
4.5704,840
ZD LE-OOl
ZDLE-003
ND
18-40
ND
ND
46 12
187-523
ND
718857
ND
ND
ND
1,340,000-2,580,000
5287
ND
386,000477.000
340.000-367.000
229.000636.000
8.760-15.300
ZE LE001
Zt Lfc 002
ND
2.970-3.080
ND
ND
ND
7,480-10,500
ND
17,100 18,500
ND
ND
ND
2.430,000-2,4/0,000
2/-70
ND
5.570,000-5,670.000
14,800 15,000
1,430,000-1,450.000
470 498
Siandards/Cniena (in M9/L)
EPToxicity
Maximum
Allowable
Limit
5,000
100,000
1.000
5,000
SNA
SNA
5,000
SNA
200
1,000
S.OOO
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
Sdle Dnnkinc
Water ActW
MCls
50
1.000
10
50
SNA
SNA
SO
SNA
2
10
•>o
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
Safe Drinking
Water ActtW
SMCLs
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
1,000
300
SNA
50
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
5.000
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
ISJ
o
ND Not Detected
SNA Standard Not Available
(•'I Primary Drinking Water Standards
C-0 Secondary Drinking vValer Standards
-------
TABLE 7-13
RANGES OF LEACHATE CONCENTRATIONS
OF INORGANIC CONSTITUENTS FROM MONOFILLS
Constituent
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Lead
Mercury
Selenium
Silver
Aluminum
Beryllium
Boron
Calcium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lithium
Magnesium
Manganese
Molybdenum
Nickel
Potassium
Sodium
Strontium
Tin
Silicon
Concentration
(Literature)
(mg/L)
0.005-0.218
1.0
ND-0.044
0.006-1.53
0.012-2.92
0.001-0.008
0.0025-0.037
0.07
NR
NR
NR
21
NR
0.022-24
0.168-121
NR
NR
0.103-4.57
NR
ND-0.412
21.5
200-4,000
NR
NR
NR
Concentration
(CORRE Study)
(mg/L)
ND-0.400
ND-9.22
ND-0.004
ND-0.032
ND-0.054
NO
ND-0.340
NO
ND-0.920
NA
NA
64.6-8,390
NA
ND-0.012
0.108-10.5
NA
14.8-367
0.310-18.5
NA
NA
79.7-1,620
188-3,800
NA
NA
0.470-15.3
EPToxicity
Maximum
Allowable Limit
(mg/L)
5.0
100.0
1.0
5.0
5.0
0.2
1.0
5.0
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
Primary Drinking
Water Standard
(mg/L)
0.050
1 000
0010
0050
0050
0002
0010
0 050
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
R339911
7-21
-------
TABLE 7-13
RANGES OF LEACHATE CONCENTRATIONS
OF INORGANIC CONSTITUENTS FROM MONOFILLS
PAGE TWO
Constituent
Titanium
Vanadium
Yttrium
Zinc
Chloride
Sulfate
pH
TDS
Concentration
(Literature)
(mg/L)
NR
NR
NR
ND-3.3
1,803-18,500
94
8.04-8.3
1 1 ,300-28,900
Concentration
(CORRE Study)
(mg/L)
NA
NA
NA
0.0052-0.370
7,700-22,000
14.4-5,080
5.2-7.4
924-41,000
EP Toxicity
Maximum
Allowable Limit
(mg/L)
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
Primary Drinking
Water Standard
(mg/L)
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
NO Not detected.
NR Not reported in the literature.
NA Not analyzed, as it was not part of the scope of work for this study.
SNA Standard Not Available.
Source: First column is from "Characterization of MWC Ashes and Leachates from MSW
Landfills, Monofills, and Co-Disposal Sites," EPA, October 1987. Second column is
from this study.
R339911
7-22
-------
;o
UJ
u>
ID
TABLE 7-14
LEACH ATE CONVENTIONAL ANALYSES
RANGES OF CONCENTRATIONS
Parameter
Ammonia-Distilled (as N)
lotal Organic Carbon
pll (field) (standard units)
Sulfate
Solids. Dissolved <3> 180*C
Tola! Alkalinity
Nitiate(asN)
Onhophosphate
Specific Conductivity
Chloride
Temperature CO (field)
Kjeldahl Nitrogen
ZA-LE-001-
ZA-LE-007
53-35
17-420
67-74
620 1.500
13.70041,000
44-120
NO 02
0 18 1 2
33.000-46.000
Mmhos/cm
7.700-22,000
NA
3443
Samples (in mg/L)
2B-LE-001
4 18
30
65
171
40.600
65
045
001
> 10,000 Mmhos/cm
NA
9
NA
ZC-LE-001-
2C-LE-002
682 774
47 2 49 3
69
144-14 5
924-932
560 S66
040041
NO
l.BOOMmhos/cm
NA
21
NA
ZD-LE-OOI-
ZD-LE 003
4 38-28 4
288307
NR
4.1405,080
8.030 13,000
709-744
ND-004
0 17-024
9.400 > 10,000
Mmhos/cm
NA
19^30
NA
ZE LE-OOI-
2E-LE-002
978-11 4
25 5-28 9
52
309 312
25.900-26,300
952 117
001
ND
> 10.000
NA
23
NA
Slanddrds/Oiieria (in mg/L)
tPToxicily
Maximum
Allowable
1 imit
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
Sale Drinking
Waler Act<*l
MCLS
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
10
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
Safe Drinking
Water ActlW
SMCLs
SNA
SNA
SNA
250
500
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
250
SNA
SNA
ISJ
NA Not analyzed, due to differences in scope of work.
ND Not detected
NR Not reported; pH meter not working properly
SNA Standard not available
<•>) Primary Drink ing Water Standards
I") Secondary Drinking Water Standards
-------
TABLE 7-15
RANGES OF EXTRACT CONCENTRATIONS OF ORGANIC CONSTITUENTS
FROM MUNICIPAL WASTE INCINERATOR COMBINED FLY ASH AND BOTTOM ASH
FOR THREE LEACHING PROCEDURES
Constituents
Naphthalene
Methyl naphthalene
OleylAlcohol<1>
Methoxy ethane*2)
Methoxy ethanol
Dimethyl propdioK3'
Phenol
Bisoxy ethanol W
Ethoxy ethanoK5)
Cycloocta decone<6>
M. Furandione<7>
E. Dim dioxaneW
Benz, Di carboxy A
Benzole acid
Range of Concentrations (ppm)
Deionized Water
Extraction Procedure
(Literature)
First
Extraction
NO
ND-0.080
ND-0.088
ND
ND
ND-0.160
ND
ND-0.096
ND-0.310
ND-0.580
ND
ND-0.510
ND
NR
Second
Extraction
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND-0.006
ND-0.140
ND-0.033
ND-0.018
ND-0.390
ND-1.2
ND
ND
ND-0.002
NR
Extraction
Procedure
Test
(Literature)
ND-8
ND-18
ND
ND
ND
ND-0.190
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NR
Toxic
Characteristic
Leaching
Procedure
(Literature)
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND-0.013
ND-0.140
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NR
Deionized
Water
Extraction
Procedure
(CORRE)
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND-0.130
ND Not detected.
NR Not reported in the literature.
Source: "Characterization of MWC Ashes and Leachates From MWS Landfills, Monofills, and
Co-Disposal Sites," EPA, October 1987. Last column are the results of this study.
0> (2)-9 Octadecen-1-01 (CAS 143-28-2).
(2> 1-Methoxy-2-(methoxy methoxy)ethane (9C1) (CAS 74498-88-7).
(3) 2,2-Dimethyl-1,3-propanedial(CAS 162-30-7).
W 2,2-{1,2-Etharediylbis (oxy) bis-}ethanol (CAS 112-27-6).
<5> (2)-9 Octadecer-1-01 (CAS 143-28-2).
(6) 1,4,7,10,13,16-Hexaoxa cycloocta decane (CAS 17455-13-9).
(7) 3,4-Dimethyl-2,5-furadione (9C1) (CAS 766-39-2).
(8! 5-Ethyl-2,2-dimethyl-1,3,-dioxane (9C1) (CAS 25796-26-3).
R339911
7-24
-------
TABIE 716
ASH EXTRACTS METALS ANALYSES
RANGES OF CONCENTRATIONS
COMPARISON OF UTERATURE VALUES WITH RESULTS OBTAINED DURING CORRE STUDY
Parameter
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
lion
Lead
Manqanese
Mercury
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
?IMC
Aluminum Oxide
Calcium Oxide
Magnesium Oxide
Potassium Monoxide
Silicon Dioxide
Samples (in wg/l)
SW924
(Dl HjO)
(Literature)
550
150 390
5-30
2520
25 190
2 5-38
25 2.980
NO 10
10 100
2 S SO
NO SO
68.300
85 300
1 5 960
1 /U 29.400
122,000
536.000
NO 190
85,200-
120.000
NR
DIHiO
Extracts
(CORRE)
ND-4S
139 3,050
ND-76
NO 16
12-534
NO-US
MO 3,410
NO 20
NO 096
ND
NO
24.100
209.000
54 1.340
NO- 203,000
141,000-
1.740,000
21 379
13.100-
189,000
402-3.990
EPTOX
Extracts
(Literature)
5 100
27-6,300
10-3,940
59460
39-1,190
4,500
143,000
20-34,000
3.6006.240
NO-6.000
2-100
1-100
89.900-
100.000
38.500-
726.000
31.900
43,800
77.000-
1.740.000
22.800-
42,700
10.000
154.000
NR
EPTOX
Extracts
(CORRE)
ND31
23-455
25-1.200
NO 86
245.170
NO 82, 000
ND 19.700
250 8.S40
ND203
ND
ND
33.600-
225.000
67 95.600
NO 150,000
592.000-
4.810.000
27,300-
130.000
10.100-
189,000
5,09098.700
TCLP
Extracts
(Literature)
537
NR
25-3.320
25439
25 19
B2860.600
655 30. 100
4,200 11.900
4 4
25 25
NR
NR
23,300
373.000
NK
NR
NR
NR
NR
TCLP1
Extracts
(Literature)
1030
100-3,200
30 1,900
200-320
50-90
183.000
230.000
900 47,000
7.040 7,470
5060
10 10
2040
103.000
110000
72.200-
83,200
30.800-
32,800
1.930.000-
1,990.000
41.700-
41 UOO
106.000-
111.000
NR
TCLP 2
Extracts
(Literature)
10 100
50-630
10-470
10-160
20-20
2.180-6.330
50 6.100
3.220 3.340
NO 100
10 50
10 SO
1,410,000
1 500.000
23.500-
32.000
90-90
362,000-
1.430,000
140-27.900
86.500
93.900
NR
TCLP 1
Extracts
(CORRE)
ND
161-1. 850
ND 1,150
ND-80
5858
NO 7.220
NO 10,500
ND 5.1/0
ND 38
ND
NO
1.380.000
1 640 000
9 / 79.500
N062.800
666.000-
2.750.000
55 3/5.000
14.600
210.000
379 51,700
TCLP 2
Extracts
(CORRE)
ND60
12809
ND 1,560
ND-799
54 1.400
NO 1b2.000
NO 26.400
38 7,370
NO 46
ND
NO
38, /OO-
228.000
26 164,000
ND 152.000
692.000
3.640,000
623 137.000
15.100
1.110.000
870 143.000
CO.. txlracls
ND53
126-530
ND-354
NO 9 8
8 8 620
NO 304
ND 504
NO 2.390
NO 155
NO
NO 16
24.800
168.000
5 12/.000
NO90.700
398.000
1.920.000
207-59.300
12.300
155,000
418/1.800
SAHLxtracts
ND
129 3.960
NO 60
NO 10
85 610
NO 97
ND 3 94O
NO fa 4
NO 1 1
NO ?3
NO
4 1,770
Standards/Criteria
(in ng/L)
EP loxicity Maximum
Allowable Limn
5.000
100.000
1,000
5.000
SNA
SNA
5.000
SNA
200
1.000
5,000
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
SNA
ISJ
Ul
ND Not detected
NR Not reported in the liteiature
SNA Standard not available
-------
-------
REFERENCES
-------
REFERENCES
EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). March 1987. Risk Assessment Forum:
"Interim Procedures for Estimating Risks Associated With Exposure to Mixtures of
Chlorinated Dibenzo-p-dioxins and Dibenzofurans (CDDs and CDFs)."
EPA/625/3-87/012.
EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). October 1987. "Characterization of
MWC Ashes and Leachates from Landfills, Monofills, and Co-Disposal Sites."
EPA 530-SW-87-028A, prepared by NUS Corporation, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, for
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Washington, D.C.
EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). October 1988. "National Secondary
Drinking Water Regulations", 40 CFR 143, September 26, 1988, as cited in
Environment Reporter, Bureau of National Affairs, Washington, D.C.
EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). June 1989. "National Primary Drinking
Water Regulations," 40 CFR 141, April 17,1989, as cited in Environment Reporter,
Bureau of National Affairs, Washington, D.C.
EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). August 1989. "Municipal Waste
Combustion Ash and Leachate Characterization, Monofill Baseline Year." Prepared
by NUS Corporation, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, for Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response, Washington, D.C.
EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). December 1989. "Municipal Waste
Combustion Ash and Leachate Characterization, Monofill-Second Year Study".
Draft. Prepared by NUS Corporation, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, for Office of Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, Washington, D.C.
Kimbrough, R.I., H. Falk, P. Stehr and G. Fries, 1984. "Health Implications of 2,3,7,8-
Tetrachlorodibenzodioxin (TCDD) Contamination of Residential Soil", J. Tox. &
Environ. Health. 14.47-93.
R339911 R-1
-------
NUS Corporation, February 1988. "Final Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) for
Characterization of Leachates and Soils." Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
NUS Corporation, December 1988. "Final Work Plan, U.S. EPA and The Coalition on
Resource Recovery and the Environment (CORRE)." Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
R339911
R-2
-------
APPENDICES
-------
-------
APPENDIX A
FINAL WORK PLAN
R339911
-------
IMUS
J I COPPORATOSJ
VWAOTB MANAOMMBMT MMVICM
SAPK W«ST TrfVO
Oj/w v*s<« SOAO
-i. PA 19O79-1O71
FINAL
WORK PLAN
U.S. EPA AND
THE COALITION ON RESOURCE RECOVERY
AND THE ENVIRONMENT (CORRE)
NUS PROJECT NUMBER
DECEMBER 1988
SUBMITTED FOR NUS BY:
HAIA HOFFMAN
PROJECT MANAGER
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION PAGE
1.0 INTRODUCTION L1
2.0 DETAILED SCOPE OF WORK 2-1
2.1 FIEIDSAMPUNG . . 2-1
2.11 Sampling Procedure* 2-1
2.11.1 Sample Collection 2-1
2.12 Sample Numbering 2-4
2.1 3 Sample Documentation . 2-4
2.1.4 Sample Handling 2-5
2.1.5 Sample Packaging and Shipping 2-5
2.1.6 Equipment Decontamination 2-6
2.2 SAMPLE HANDLING AND PREPARATION 2-6
2.2.1 Ash Sample Preparation 2-7
2.2.2 Extraction Sample Preparation 2-7
2.2.3 Field Leachate Analysis 2-9
3.0 SAMPLE ANALYSES 3-1
4.0 DATA EVALUATION AND ANALYSIS 4-1
5.0 REPORTS ....'. 5-1
6.0 SCHEDULE 6-1
APPENDICES
A CARBON-DIOXIDE*SATU RATED DBONIZfO WATER AND A-1
SIMULATED AGO RAIN EXTRACTION SOLUTIONS
AND EXTRACTION PROCEDURES
B PCDO/PCO* AND Pd ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES AND B-1
QA/QC PROTOCOLS
R339I9
-------
TABLES
NUMBER PAGE
1-1 Sampling and Analysis Summary 1-2
2-1 Analytical Parameters, Containers, and Preservatives 2-3
2-2 Sample Preparation and Chemical Analysis by Laboratones 2-8
*339t9 Ml
-------
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This work plan has been prepared for tht Unittd Starts Environmtntal Prottction Agency (EPA) and
tht Coalition on Resource Rtcovtry and th« Environment (CORRE) in response to a jointly-sponsored
EPA and CORRE study to characterize the composition of municipal wast* combustion (MWC) ashes
and associated leachates from the corresponding monofills.
The objective of this study is to collect ash samples from five MWC facilities and subject them to
laboratory analysis and several laboratory extractions, as well as to collect natural leachates from the
MWC Ash Monofills in which these ashes are disposed. Results of this study will enhance the data
base on the characteristics of MWC ashes, extracts, and leachates from MWC ash monofills. The data
obtained m this study must be of high quality, from the perspective of both sampling and chemical
analysis. Table 1-1 provides a summary of the number of samples to be taken and the types of
analyses to be performed.
This phase of the project concentrates on five MWC facilities. Additional facilities may be added to
the study at a later date by the study sponsors.
All information obtained throughout this study, including the identification of the facilities
participating in this study, will be treated with utmost confidentiality. Only selected NUS personnel
will have access to the data. Except for these selected NUS project team members, no one, including
the EPA sponsors of the study, will have access to the data. All project data will be kept in a secure
locked file or work area at all times. Access to this area will be strictly limited.
Section 2.0 of this work plan addresses the scope of work. Recommendations included in the EPA
publication entitled 'Sampling and Analysis of Municipal Refuse incineration Ash* will be adhered
to. Section 3.0 describes the analytical protocols; Section 4.0 delineates data validation and
evaluation; Section 5.0 describes tfce.content of the draft and final reports to be produced; and"
Section 6.0 addresses the study schedule.
R339M 1-1
-------
TABLE 1-1
SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS SUMMARY
CORRE
Sampling
Number of
Facilities
Number of
Samples per
Facility
Total
Number of
Samples
Types of Analysis
MWC TOTAL ASH
5
2
5
5
5(3)
1(3)
1(3)
1(3)
25
2
5
5
Metals(') and conventional
PCBs
PCDDs/PCDFs
Semivolatiles (Appendix IX)
MWC ASH EXTRACTS
5
5
2
5(3)
1(3)
1(3)
150
5<«>
2(4)
Metals'1' and conventional*'^ utilizing the
extraction procedures listed in Section 2.2.2
Semivolatiles and PCDDs/PCDFs
PCBs
FIELD LEACHATES
4
1
4
4
2
2
2
2
8
2
8
8
Metals*1' and conventional^)
PCBs
PCDDs/PCDFs
Semivolatiles
(') Includes metals on primary and secondary drinking water standard lists and others as
follows: As, Ba. Cd, Cr, Pb, Hg, Se, Ag, Na, Cu, Fe, Mn, and Zn; Al, Si Ca. Mg, K.
(2) includes the following conventional parameters: TOC, total soluble salts, NHj-N, NO^-M,
SO«,PO4,CO*aandpH.
(3) Each sampie represents a composite of 8 individual samples collected per day.
<*> A composite of the extracts from only one extraction procedure will be analyzed for
Semivolatiles, PCDDs/PCDFs and PCBs. The extraction procedure to be chosen will be
determined at a later date based on results obtained for metals and conventional
parameters.
*339tt
1-2
-------
2.0 DETAILED SCOPE OF WORK
This section provides the program elements for sampling and analysis of MWC ashes from five
facilities and MWC Ash Monofill leachates from four facilities, it also provides the scope of work for
data evaluations and interpretation, reporting, and the QA/QC elements necessary for ensuring a
meaningful program.
it is assumed in this Work Plan that the five MWC facility and associated MWC Ash Monofill sites will
be selected by CORRE. Site locations and a contact person at each facility will be identified by CORRE
and provided to NUS.
2.1 FIELD SAMPUNG
The purpose of this task is to perform the actual collection of leachate from four MWC Ash Monofills
and ash samples from five MWC facility sites, document the sampling, and handle and ship the
samples in accordance with the following procedures.
2.1.1 Sampling Procedure*
2.1.1.1 Sample Collection
Leachate Sample Collection
Four MWC facilities will be chosen for leachate sampling. Leachates will be collected from the
leachate collection system of the MWC Ash Monofill. Two samples will be collected at each of the
four facilities for laboratory analysis of metals, conventional parameters, PCOOs/PCOFs, and
Appendix IX sefnivoiatile*. Two samples collected from only one facility will be analyzed for PCBs.
Leachate samples will be taken from the collection system as grab samples. Candidate sampling
locations include collection sumps and/or drainage ditches. The NUS onsite person will select the
sampling points in cooperation with facility personnel. Preferably, the samples will be collected by
submerging the sample containers. Alternatively, they will be collected using stainless-steel buckets
attached to an aluminum handle or a polyethylene rope.
*339W 2-1
-------
All sample containers will be filled to capacity to prevent oxidation and precipitation of dissolved
metals.
Samples destined for metal analyses will be filtered m the field prior to acidification, if possible, if
impracticable to filter in the field, samples will not be acidified in the field but only cooled and
instructions sent to the laboratory (VERSAR) to filter and acidify upon receipt of sample.
All samples destined for semtvolatile analyses (Appendix IX), PC29s/PCDFs and PCBs if found to be
turbid, will be centnfuged by the analyzing laboratories (VERSAR and BATTELLE) onor to being
extracted for analysis. Only the liquid will be analyzed, instructions to centrifuge will be sent from
the field with the applicable samples by the NUS Sampler.
Leachate sampling will be performed by NUS personnel. Table 2-1 lists the number of samples,
analytical parameters, containers, and preservatives applicable to collection of the leachate samples.
These samples will be analyzed for metals and conventional parameters, PCOOs, PCDFs, and
Appendix IX semi volatile compounds. One sample per site from only two facilities will be analyzed
for PCBs.
MWC Ash Sample Collection
Five ash composite samples will be collected at five MWC facilities. Ash samples will be collected
from a conveyor. Sarr -• rig will be performed by fac / personnel. An NUS sampling expert will be
on site during the ash ^mpling.
The following procedures will be employed during j*h sampling:
• Samples will be collected with a shovel.
e Grab samples will be) taken from the conveyor using "ASTM 02234-86 Standard Methods
for Collection of a Gross Sample of Coal," Condition B, full-stream cut.
• Collection will be done at a fixed point each hour for 8 hours.
R33M9 2-2
-------
TABLE 2-1
ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS, CONTAINERS, AND PRESERVATIVES
CORRE
Number
of
Samples
Type of Analysis
Container^ $)0>
Preservative^)
SOURCE: MWC MONOF1LL LEACHATE
8
8
8
8
2
8
8
Metals^
TOC, NH3 -N
TOS, NO3-N, SO«, PO4
C03
PCBs
PCDOVPCDFs
Semivolatiles (Appendix IX)
One 1 -liter polyethylene
One 1 -liter polyethylene
One 1 -liter polyethylene
One 500-ml polyethylene
Two 1/2-gallon amber glass
Two 1/2-gallon amber glass
Two 1/2-gallon amber glass
HN03:opH <2
H2S04topH <2
HNO3tOpH <2
SOURCE: MWC ASH
200
Metal$<3>, semivolatiles (Appendix IX),
PCDDs/PCDFVPCBs, and
conventional*4' parameters in ash and
in ash extractions listed in
Section 2.2.2
1 quart
<1> All containers will have Teflon-lined, screw-on lids.
(2) All samples will be cooled to 4*C
(3) AS. Ba, Cd, Cr, Pb, Hg. Se, Ag, Na, Cu, Fe, Mn, and Zn; Oxides Al, Si, Ca, Mg, K.
w TOC, total soluble salts. NHr-N, NOr-N. SO* PO«, C03, G, and pH.
(5) The 200 samples will be grouped as 8-hour composites yielding a total of 25 samples. Two of
the 25 composite samples extractions will also be analyzed for PCBs and 5 will be analyzed for
PCDOVPCDFs and semivoietiles (Appendix IX).
R339tf
2-3
-------
a Tha aight samplas will ba scoopad into a 5-gallon container and will ba composited into an
8-hour composite sampla. Tha container will be sealed, labeled, and stored for shipment
at the end of the 5 days of sampling. Sample handling and shipping will be done by NUS
personnel.
• Samples will be collected each day over 5 days of facility operation. Starting time for
sample collection will be one 1 hour later each day. For example. Monday sample
collection will begin at 8:00 a.m., Tuesday at 9:00 a.m., etc.
Table 2-1 lists the number of samples, analytical parameters, containers, and preservatives for the
leachate and ash samples.
2.1.2 Sample Numbering
AH samples will be assigned a field identification number to include codes for the site name, sample
type, and station number. The site name may be abbreviated using a two- or three-letter code, such
as ML. The sample type will be denoted as either IE, for leachate samples, or AH, for ash samples.
The station number will refer to a specific sampling location, if applicable.
Additional codes will be utilized for identifying the first hour of ash sampling and the data. The date
will be noted by two digits for the month, day, and the year; the hour of day will be designated by
four digits. For example, an ash sample collected at the first location on December 20,1988, at
10:00 a.m., would be designated as follows:
a ML-AH-001
a 12-20-88-1000
2.1.3
All site activity and sampling will be documented in a waterproof, bound, log book to be completed
by the NUS onsite personnel. Additionally, the following documents will be prepared to track each
sample through shipping and analysis:
a Sample labels • One per sample container; information on the label will include date, time,
sample number, analysis, and preservative.
• Traffic report forms • Individual forms for each individual laboratory.
R339C9 2-4
-------
• Chain-of-custody fprmj - One per sample shipment to an individual laboratory.
• Chain-of-custody seals - Two per cooler, affixed so that the cooler cannot be opened
without breaking the seals.
e Airbills • One per sample shipment to an individual laboratory.
2.1.4 Sample Handling
All liquid samples will be placed on ice in a cooler immediately after collection. Required
preservatives for the liquid samples will be added as soon as possible after collection. The
subsequent list of procedures will then be followed: :
e Complete proper decontamination.
e Tighten and secure the lid of each container.
e Seal each container in a watertight plastic bag.
Samples will be shipped the day they are collected via a qualified carrier for next-day delivery. Ash
samples will be shipped to the VERSAft laboratory upon completion of sampling at each facility.
2.1.5 Sample Packaging and Shipping
To ensure that the laboratories will receive enough sample volume, all samples will be treated as
environmental samples. The following steps will be taken during packaging and shipping:
• Plug the drain and line the cooler with a large, impervious plastic sheet
• Place samples in the cooler.
• I ncl ude several watertight ice packs.
e Fill with a light, absorbent, packing material such as vermiculite.
• Place laboratory copies of sample documentation in a sealed plastic bag and tape to the
cooler lid.
R339M 2-5
-------
e Affix custody seals.
e Secure the cooler with strapping tape.
e The traffic report forms will indicate whether the field team believes that a sample is of
medium concentration.
2.1.6 Equipment Decontamination
Dedicated disposable or laboratory-cleaned equipment will be used to collect all samples. After use,
any nondisposabie equipment, such as a shovel, will be decontaminated using the following steps, as
applicable:
• Tap water and laboratory-grade soap wash
• Tap water rinse
e 10 percent nitric acid solution rms«
e 01 water rinse
e Sol vent rinse
e 01 water rinse
• Air dry
e Foil wrapping and storage in a secure area
2.2 SAMPLE HANDLING AND PftfPAKATION
Samples collected during the field sampling will consist of two basic types of media: field leachate
and MWC ash samples.
All field leachate samples except those to be analyzed for PCBs and PCODs/PCOFs will be shipped to
v ERSAR. Samples to be analyzed for PCBs and PCDDs/PCDFs will be shipped to Battalia Columbus.
R33«t9
-------
2.2.1 Aih Sample Preparation
All field MWC ash samples will be sent to VERSAR. VERSAR will prepare these samples for analysis by
implementing the following procedures:
e Each composite will be passed over a 2-mch screen. Material passing the 2-mch screen will
be set aside. Material larger than 2 inches will be subjected to repeated blows with a
5-pound sledge hammer dropped from a height of t foot, if a piece does not break after
being subjected to three blows of the hammer, it will be weighed, the weight recorded,
and discarded. Material that breaks will then be reduced in size to pass the 2-inch screen
and recombined with the original material smaller than 2 inches.
• Each composite sample will be dried, crushed to pass a 3/8-inch screen and riffled or coned
and quartered to obtain a 1,000-gram sample. The sample will then be properly labeled
and stored in a clean, dry, cool, secure area. For further details, see ASTM Standard 0346.
Selected portions of five leachate extractions for each of the extraction methodologies will be sent
to Battelle Columbus for PCDD/PCDF and PCS analysis. Table 2-2 summarizes the analysis by
laboratories.
2.2.2 Extraction Sample Preparation
VERSAR will extract ash samples using six different extraction methods, as follows:
• Acid No. 1 (EP-TOX)
• Acid No. 2 (TCLP Fluid No. 1)
• Acid No. 2 (TCLP Fluid No. 2)
• Method 924
• C02 saturated deionized water
• Simulated acid rain
The laboratory will adhere to the appropriate Federal Register leaching requirements for the first
four methods. The extraction solutions and the extraction procedures for the C02 saturated
deionized water and the simulated acid rain are given in Appendix A.
R33M9 2-7
-------
TA4LE2-2
SAMPLE PREPARATION AND CHEMICAL ANALYSIS IY LAIORATORIES
CORRE
Sample Media
MWC Total Ash
MWC Ash Extractions
Field leachates
Preparation
VERSAR
VERSAR
VERSAR
Analysis*
VERSAR: Metals,* Conventional,' Semivolatiles'*
8ATTELLE COLUMBUS: PCBs, PCDOVPCDFs
VERSAR: Metals, Conventional*, Semivolatiles
BATTELLE COLUMBUS: PCBs, PCDDs/PCDFs
VERSAR: Metals, Convent) onals, Semivolatiles
BATTELLE COLUMBUS: PCBs, PCDOVPCDFs
* See footnotes to Table 2*1 for detailed individual analyses of metals and conventional
parameters.
** Appendix IX.
R33M9
2-4
-------
VERSAR will analyze the extracts for metals, conventional parameters, and the semivoiatiie
compounds on tht Appendix IX list and will ship the selected extract samples to Battelle Columbus
for PCB, PCOF, and PCDO analyses.
2.2.3 Field Leachate Analysis
Leachatt samples collected from the field will be analyzed for metals, conventional parameters, and
semivoiatiie compounds by VERSAR and for PCBs and PCOOs/PCOPs by Battelle Columbus.
•aoie t
K339W -, ,. 2-9
-------
3.0 SAMPLE ANALYSES
All analyses except for PCBs, PCDO/PCDFs, and conventional parameters will be conducted m strict
adherence to the EPA third edition of SW-&4$ and will include all deliverables specified by the
applicable method.
The conventional parameters will be analyzed according to the applicable methods described m the
"Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wattewaterv' EPA-600/4-J9-OZO, March ^983.
PCBs, PCDDs, and PCDFs will be analyzed in the homolog form according to th« procedures described
in Appendix 8. in addition, for the PCOOs and PCDFs the concentrations of the individual
2,3,7,8 isomers will oe determined for each homolog.
-------
4.0 DATA EVALUATION AND ANALYSIS
Results obtained from the laboratories will be validated, according to EPA national validation
guidelines; evaluated; and interpreted. The data will be compiled into a single data base.
Results of laboratory analyses will be validated by qualified NUS chemists, according to QA standards
established by EPA. The data validation is independent of internal validation performed by the
laboratories involved, and is intended to assure high quality data.
The validated data will be compiled into a single data base. These data will be compared with
literature information and with Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements (ARARs).
Attempts will be made to evaluate the environmental effects of the ashes and the leachates.
Operating data for the sampled facilities during the sampling period will be provided, as available,
from the facility personnel.
R33M9 • dBMP 4>1
-------
5.0 REPORTS
NUS will prepare a draft report, which will contain the following dtscriptions:
• MWC facilities sampled. Facility identification will be kept in confidence, and only codes
will be used.
e MWC ash monofills sampled. Facility location will be limited to identification by codes
only.
e Sampling procedures.
e Analytical procedures.
e Results.
e Evaluation of results.
The draft report will be submitted for review by EPA and CORRE. A final report will be issued upon
receipt of comments from EPA and CORRE.
EPA and CORRE may provide a list of three potential peer reviewers who will be given the
opportunity to comment on the draft report. The peer reviewer's comments will also be
incorporated in the final report
*
R339W 5-1
-------
APPENDIX A
CARBON-DIOXIDE-SATURATED DEIONIZED WATER
AND SIMULATED ACID RAIN EXTRACTION SOLUTIONS
AND EXTRACTION PROCEDURES
-------
C02 SATURATED ElUANT
Th« intentof this eluant formation i»to simulate a relatively "natural" low pH rainwater without th«
use of atmospheric man-made contaminants common such as HC1 and $04.
Step 1 One must develop a "pH-time of purging" relationship curve. This is done simply by
plotting observed pH to delta time during purge of distilled water with compressed
CO;. Pursuant to Henry's gas law (attached text) an equilibrium of CO: at controlled
ambient temperature in liquid from gas will be reached-at this time pH and time of
purge should be recorded and thereafter used as a reference for preparing the CO;
saturated distilled water solutions.
Step 2 After obtaining the reference pH and CO2 time, use the prepared eluant per SW-846
procedures.
SYNTHETIC ACID RAIN ELUANT
The intent of this eluant formation is to simulate an acid rain representative of the Northeastern
United States according to the National Atmosphere Deposition Program (NADP) quality reference.
Step 1 Prepare the following primary solution
Parameter Units
Distilled water 4 liters
NaNO3 0.1150 grams (gm)
KNOj 0.2l9€gm
NH4NO? 0.644 gm
MgClj 0.0821gm
H2SO4 0.1755 gm of t9« percent!
C*SO4 0.1057 gm
Step 2 To achieve a more reasonable pH representative of the Northeast, dilute the solution
prepared in Step 1 by ten (10) fold.
Step 3 Utilize th« eluam prepared form Step 2 pursuant to SW-846 procedures.
R339M
-------
us
Ul
tht port oompontat, dM oaaditioBi art iavonbu fcf
MparadOB ocean whan dM Gibbt tnerfy of dM two»phata lyram blowar dMa
that of tat homoftBOBui lynan. Fifurt 3.M ihowi dM typt of phaw TJitanni that
muhi if dM paaittS* dcvutfeat from Raoult'i law arttolarft dMt dMrt it a raaft
of IsttoiicibUity of dM two Iiouidi> '
It it iaporaat to oedct that ia all of dt«a fear diaaro&i dw vapor praamrt of
the compooont praiaat at hifhcr coacantndoc appreachai dM vatoai ftvaa by
Kaouit'i law at in BMU fraction appreachai ualty. Other typti of dtwiadoat from
i law art ahw feuad. A aonpoatat may thow poaWvt dtviafloaa ia duuM
i aad ntajatin dWadoni ia ooacaatratad aaludoot or vice'
is ooBxpoatooo
at 78.$ *C, aad
aad eoataiat 4.0%
aadwatarferma
KQbywtiflit.
ydrochloric add, which boflt at -»*C,
craoc at 108.5M *0 that eonajiai
la aU dM ovapMi ihowB ia FIf. 3.9 dMrt 114
d>o oartal anamra of dM wluta (tha cotaaomnt at MW
Thh «raatMa to
Tha ubiafipt 2 adkatM dMt
nftrrtd to at HaBry*i law, aad dM
la dfluti ailtttMai dM
19 tfftm tbt MhibUhki of
A few faj tobbiUtMi at 23 «C att
-------
r
ut
Up to a
loJubk
at \ MB
*»thto I • 3% fcr MB?
W
Hi
*
Oh
CO
00,
CK.
CA
GA
CA
544
Ml
940
444
1JS
11.4
1.0!
•JT
210
10»
I0»
J0»
10*
10*
10*
10*
10*
10*
17S K 10*
1.71 « IV
IM* 10*
147 * 10*
447 M 10*
tt «*G M • pwtai
• Uttr rf MtariM «Mttft
rf CO» ««« dM idtttte rf TfO Mr.
L-»
Tbt
vMllOTr WBm paiM (H^ H» X^Mfc
I.U
•ad pi
ud
hi.
-^•.u—
activity
Thtcb*
MBl
wm{
it II
-------
c
IM
For ±t (tiMociarion of aa add wi
ch« thcRBodyumic dJuodadoii conitant X, , t it fhrea by
_ > f.
' .
••
I.
Jf-»
Subttiradaf tqufttioa tf.3 aad ratmafiaf yiddi
1.1
•ad pX, tor KJO« at 29 *C aad 001 toe*
^? « pjr/M . i)o.o*i
• 2.141 - 0.04C - 2.101
• 7.1« - 5(0.041) . 7.010
QAftMMG
AOB» AND •QAUOKAT1 IOK
The equilibria dtaiMd ia thit Medea an of latawat booMM of tho imponaact of
COt ia dM nfttladoa of the pH of blood. The idaatki of theM roaeaoat are
ia Stedoa 16.1
' • MMJui MWWMU M MM wv/g (LiiutVc^i^ggMar • ujr%!l&iAu tw uirwwuw iuiuL
(HO)
\ww
At2a*G,rfc.OOOI5».Tb«
efaMfe art bedi uaMvanbb fcr the bydradoa roMdon, ee ebowa by dM vmltMia
Tabto 12; atradMMB, CO( baa M to bydraMd ia order MT dM dfcMived
ponad MOW btapb HM •urapy rhaniji MT nacdMi U ii aofadve,
^ (Ml)
•fw
>4<7
At U
How«
tnd il
earboi
to dif
tp«cia
Tb«
Thw
Caleul
-------
CB.I
U
(6-6)
(6.7)
(M)
a« of
U («
•' 0)
ar py
Ju in
dCO,
K 1M
> men
(6.11)
(l 2)
TakloM Tkomodyuaic Qjiaodtioi at 29 *C aod Zan
(HiC<
ijj"
. ikj^jjSiL}
. _ (H'KHCO.-)
'l (COJ * (HfCOi)
2.51
S.77
•.333
10.329
3,3*)
3,170
8.M4
14.0M
1,190
1,010
3,60$
AT
-a
-u
-J3.I
-M
T. UMJL CO,,
* te
NAIA
mi »•• «rt-
At 25 *C, th« add diMdodon eowtoat JC,^, - 1.77 x 10"« (pJC . 9.77).
Howfvor, tw« it w< too add dtoodadon conmnt you will fed if you look In abtao,
and it it OK tte ooo you would uw in tho laboratory to do nokmlatioai OB hi-
earfaonoM buOn. Tho fOMoe it that a dM laboratory you MO aot ordinarily ahlo
to dMafUiih bcrweoa diawrvod CO, and H,CO, and dapir luap thoM two
ipodoi tofttfaor by eoaataf all daoohud CO, at HtCO,.
The tm add diawdation oonnont /i for caroook odd fa doflaod M
(8.1S)
Thw
diawdotka of eorbeak odd fa of ipodal
in blood.
it fa un /\
9.15) for tic i ;
O.OM Ml L'1, tad M ofttttfaji 113 may bo wnttott
If wo Bypommflaa (knubo bard), raoedoB «J ihtfliio tfao kft; tfafa
raecdott 11 1 to ottft to tho loft and, at o rawfe, the pK rfaa. If ao
of HCO, • in our hfeed fa too bitt, the bleed pH fa we UfB aod tat body
l '
1;
••'-•ife
j. i k*
>•.
f.
4V
t
•f?
-------
£6*i
1M •*•
ia rmu of twretion of HCO,' tn th« uhnc la thia w*y d* pH of blood U main-
tained in th« rtUtivtly narrow raitflt of 7.0 to 7.6.
« i '
•'•ill
!'•'
u
I! '
.1
v-v't
1
MLATION UTWlBf
MiOmOtQOFIO OMOOATtON
OOMTAMn AMD MACROiCOflO
OOaOCUTXOM CONVTANTt
dtaod»«ioM
ianratiaf oaapte of th«
H.NCH.CO,- (6.18)
the microicopk
When f tyoiM it timad, wt do
tat dipolar too, *H^GHtOO«',
aad M w« daflM tha ftm add dtaoctadaa
,*f
MM. 1« addirfom, tht pfindf** of
ttevmhwoftte
-------
A uHtCO,.
th> »H, tad •«
pic tquipflMBC
« J point wb«a
it mctio&in
*talvud by tb«
O .caydnuai.
i,,iti»nirawy
CC ')
it racial in
of CO* Sine*
,C .bywtrf
•-0 ) (15.19)
) *
(1120)
f:
MU MM**]
•
7
I
»
O.OQMI
0,0*
on
SJ
14.9
144
S,?
which
»«i«vmihtt
At ihowa ta Iwtioa 15.1,
(16J1)
Appiyiaf ddi nladoa
0.
0.
O.OS7S 4- ~^ij * 106 x 10*(H»)
«TdM hAtf-Ufc cakalattd with thk tquadaa an &m in Tab!* 1M. Tht
MhkavpHv^tMk
hMtobt
UJ MBD AMD 1O1 OATAX.
I (oA«
- *
-------
CS9 ^^a^Lav
HHMtATIOIf OF CO, AMD
IMBRMUTIOIf OP O.CO,
la watar CO, trim larialy M diawtad CO, (m iteaoa 6,3) iaraad of « H,CO,.
T!M hal£la% fcr *t aydraaaa^aardradoa nacdoa dtpta* oa tht pH, *ad M
awtrat pH vahM k loeff caoufh that it awy bt ttudiad with tiotpi* vqaipaMat.
It ta tao ilawaav of tUi raaedoa that aeeoua* tor ta« Bbtfaf of ta« aftdpoiatwhan
carbooaa Ion to tltntai with add. Tat aatf.tia» te ta» «acaia)y«fld naeaaa ia
tquaooft buflan i« of ipodai iatarw baeauM it it too laaf to aaeouat te tat pneav
•asya* earbaaic aaaytaat 10 dui CO, aay bt aydntai, aad H«OOt daaydfMai,
men rapidly.
Ia afdat » dawaa tat atatda of dM oaeatalyMd bydndu af CO» it to i
to oaaaldar taa fcUewtaf reaction*.
CO, + H«0
• *
(16.16)
OH-
Tat raw ooatcaati an fcr 85 *C
Tht mat tquadaa fer COt i§
*.,(K,OOt) - J
Th«
M* >.HOO,- + 11,00, oai
^ ^^ MKvflnflMBK ift %VQ|0B H^9
HCO,- aad H.CO, Waute ia «iulMbrtaa,
«-)(CO,) + *..(HCCV) (1117)
aw w rapidly dwt it rvaaJat ia
fctbw tht atdjMba af CO* fiaat
. 1.70
(18.11)
•(• (H^OO,) -h (HCO,-) *
-------
APPENDIX B
PCDD/PCDF AND PCB ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
AND QA/QC PROTOCOLS
-------
METHOD AND QUALITY ASSURANCE
FOR
DETERMINATION OF 2,3,7,8 SUBSTITUTED POLYCHLORINATED
OIBENZO-P-DIOXINS AND 2,3,7,8 SUBSTITUTED POLYCHLORINATED
OIBENZOFURANS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES BY
HIGH RESOLUTION GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY-
HIGH RESOLUTION MASS SPECTROMETRY
-------
INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this document is to describe the procedures used
f. determining the levels of 2,3,7,8 substituted polychlorinated dibenzo-p-
dioxins and 2,3,7,8 substituted polychlorinated dibenzofurans (2,3,7,8-
PCOD/PCOF) in water, ash, laboratory extracts, and soil samples. The
procedure used for determination of the total levels of polychlorinated
dibenzo-p-dioxin and polychlorinated dibenzofuran (PCDD/PCDF) congener
classes is also described.
SAMPLE HANDLING
Upon receipt, the samples are kept continuously in either locked
storage or under supervision of a sample custodian. When notified of sample
receipt, the designated sample custodian picks up and logs in the samples,
assigning each a unique number. After the samples are logged in, they are
transferred to the extraction lab following chain of custody and are
assigned a new designated custodian. When the extractions are completed,
the remaining samples are transferred in tht original containers back to the
original sample custodian for permanent storage. The sample extracts are
transferred via chain of custody to the mass spectrometry laboratory for
analysis by the MS sample custodian who, upon completion of the group of
analyses, transfers the extracts back to the original sample custodian for
storage.
EXTRACTION PROCEDURE
Aqueous Samples. Samples containing sediment are filtered and the
sediment saved for extraction. Aliquots of the sample are spiked with the 5
to 40 ng of the 13Ci2 Internal standards listed in Table 1.
The samples are extracted three times with methylene chloride, the
extracts combined, and then concentrated to 5 mL in a Kudurna-Danish
apparatus. The dried sediments are added to thimbles containing 0.5 inches
of silica gel and then extracted with benzene In a soxhlet extractor for 18
-------
hours. The extracts are concentrated to approxiMtely 10 mL with three-
stage Snyder columns, and then added to the corresponding water extracts.
The combined extracts are then further concentrated to approximately 4 ml.
Ash and Soil Samples. Ten gram aliquots of sample are spiked with
the same levels of the tetra- through octa-13ci2 dioxins and furans used for
the aqueous samples. The Soxhlet extractor is assembled and the sample
extracted for 18 hours with 250 mL of benzene. After extraction, the
benzene extract is concentrated to approximately 5 mL with a 3-stage Snyder
column. Method blank and native spike samples are extracted at the
same time as the test samples.
The sample extract is diluted to 50 to 60 ml with hexane and
washed with 1 to 5 10 ml aliquots of concentrated sulfuric acid. The
combined acid washes from each extract are extracted with hexane, which is
combined with the corresponding sample extract. The combined extract is
concentrated to 5 ml and transferred to a multilayered silica gel column.
The first layer contains 44 percent sulfuric acid on silica gel while the
second contains activated silica gel, 44 percent concentrated sulfuric acid
on silica gel, and 33 percent 1M sodium hydroxide on silica gel. The
purpose of these columns is to remove acidic and basic compounds and easily
oxidized materials from the extracts. The silica gel support provides a
large surface area for contact with the sample extracts, thus improving the
cleanup efficiency. Tht PCOO/PCDF isomers art eluted from the columns with
70 ml of hexane and the entire eluate, Including the original extract
volume, is collected. Tht htxane tluatt 1s then concentrated to 2-3 mL with
a gentle stream of nitrogen.
Tht hexane solution Is fractionated on a column containing
approximately 5 g of activated basic alumina with 10 ml of hexane/methylene
chloride (97:3, v/v) and 40 mL of hexane/methylene chloride (1:1, v/v) as
elution solvents. Tht tluatt is collected, concentrated to near dryness,
and diluted to 2 ml with hexane.
This eluatt Is then fractionated further on a column containing
approximately 2 g of activated basic alumina with 3 mL of hexane/methylene
chloride (97:3, v/v) and 50 mL of hexane/methylene chloridt (1:1, v/v) as
elution solvents. Tht tluatt 1s collected, concentrated to near dryness,
-------
and dissolved in 50 pi of n-decane containing 5 to 10 ng of an absolute
recovery standard, l,2,3,4-TCDD-13ci2. This solution is stored at 0 C and
protected from light until analysis.
If the sample is still not suitable for analysis, additional
cleanup may be used. As part of this procedure, the extract is fractionated
on a column containing 1 g of activated florisil with 15 ml of hexane, 20 ml
of ethyl ether/hexane (6:94, v/v), and 75 ml of methylene chloride/hexane
(3:1, v/v) as elution solvents. The eluate is then taken to near dryness
and brought up in 50 pi of n-decane before analysis.
ANALYSIS
The extracts are quantified for 2,3,7,8-PCOD/PCDF and/or total
PCOOs/PCOFs by combined capillary column gas chromatography/high resolution
mass spectrometry (HRGC/HRMS). THe HRGC/HRMS system consists of a Carlo
Erba Model 4160 gas- chromatograph interfaced directly into the source of a
VG 7070 mass spectrometer. A 60 meter 08-5 capillary column is used to
accomplish the chromatographic separations. Helium is used as a carrier gas
in both types of analyses with a flow velocity of approximately 30 cm/sec.
The mass spectrometer is operated in the electron impact (El) ionization
mode at a mass resolution of 9,000-12,000 (M/AM, 10 percent valley
definition). The operating parameters of the HRGC/HRMS system are
summarized in Table 2. All HRGC/HRMS data are acquired by multiple-ion-
detection (MIO) with a VG Model 11-250J Data System. The exact masses
monitored are shown in Table 3.
QUALITY ASSURANCE
The operation of the HRGC/HRMS is evaluated each day for accuracy
of quantification and isomer resolution by analyzing a standard mixture
containing PCDO and/or PCDF isomers. When the analysis is for determination
of 2,3.7,8-PCDO/PCDF, the mixture contains Isomers listed 1n Table 1 along
with the unlabelled isomers listed In Table 1A. The retention times for
-------
each of the 2,3,7,8 isomers, relative to the corresponding Isotoplcally
labeled congener, are also determined fro* this standard mixture of 1 sowers.
Other native PCDO/PCOF isomers My also be Included in this
mixture but not quantified. Mixtures of selected PCOO/PCOF isowers are also
analyzed once or twice a week to evaluate the stability of the
chromatographic elution windows. The stability of the MSS focus is assured
by use of a PFK "lock Mass14 to correct for any MSS focus drift.
Native spike and laboratory blank samples are processed during the
extraction and cleanup of the samples. The native spike samples are used to
evaluate the accuracy of quantification, while the method blank samples are
used to demonstrate freedom from contamination.
RECOVERIES OF INTERNAL STANDARDS
The relative response factors used in determination of the
recoveries of the isotopically labelled internal standards which are spiked
into the samples (Table 1) are calculated by comparison of the responses
from the internal standards to the response from the external standard,
l,2,3,4-TCDO-13Ci2, which is added following the sample extraction. The
formula for this response factor calculation is:
Rf . A1s x Q1234
A1234 x Qls
where:
Rf • Response factor
Ais • Sum of Integrated areas for isotopically labelled internal
standards
Q1234 • Quantity of l,2,3,4-TCDO-13Ci2
A1234 • SUB of Integrated areas for l,2,3,4-TCDO-13Ci2
Qls * Quantity of Isotopically labelled Internal standard.
The values for the response factors are calculated for each dally standard
analysis. The avtragt value Is used in determining the recovery of the
isotopically labelled Internal standards. The recoveries art calculated by
comparing the sum of the responses fro* the two Ions monitored for each
-------
isotopically labelled internal standard to the SIM of the responses from the
two ions for the l,2,3,4-TCDO-13Ci2 external standard. The fomula used in
the recovery calculation is:
Recovery (%) • Ais x Q1234 x 100
A1Z34 x Qis x Rfa
where:
Ais » Sum of integrated areas for internal standard
Q1234 - Quantity of l,2,3,4-TCDD-13r,i2
100 * Conversion factor for %
A1234 « Sum of integrated areas for l,2,3,4-TCDO-13c12
Qis * Quantity of isotopically labelled internal standard
Rfa » Average response factor.
QUANTIFICATION
A relative response factor is calculated for each individual
2,3,7,8 isomer by comparing the SUM of the responses fro* the two na*~es
monitored for each class, at the appropriate retention time, to the sum of
the responses from the two ions for the corresponding Isotopically labelled
internal standard in each daily standard analysis. The formula for the
response factor calculations:
Rf - An x Q1s
Ais x On
where:
Rf « Response factor
An > SUM of Integrated areas for native isomer
Qis • Quantity of Internal standard
Ais * Sin of Integrated areas for Internal standard
Qn • Quantity of native isomer.
The values calculated for the dally response factors art then averaged and
this average is used In all calculations used to quantify the data.
-------
The PCOO/PCOF isomers are then quantified by comparing the sum of
the responses fro* the two ions awnitored for each class, at the appropriate
retention time, to the sum of the responses from the corresponding
isotopically labelled congener. The octa-COO-13Ci2 is used to quantify the
octa-COF. The formula for quantifying the PCDD/PCOF isomers is:
Concentration (ppb) » An x Qis
Ais x W x Rfa
where:
Cone. * Concentration in parts-per-billion (ppb) of target isomer or
congener class
An > Sum of integrated areas for the target isomer or congener class
Qis • Amount of internal standard in grans
Ais » Sum of integrated areas for the target isomer or congener class
W - Sample weight in grams
Rfa « Average response factor.
Each pair of resolved peaks in the selected-ion-current
chromatogram is evaluated manually to determine if it meets the criteria for
a PCOO or PCOF isomer. By examining each pair of peaks separately,
quantitative accuracy is improved over what is obtained when all the peaks
in a selected chromatographlc window are averaged. When averaged data are
used, it is possible for pairs of peaks with high and low chlorine isotope
ratios to produce averaged data that meet the isotope ratio criterion. For
example, two pairs of peaks having chlorine isotope ratios of 0.56 and 0.96,
both outside of the acceptable range, would have an average ratio of 0.76.
The criteria that are used to identify PCOO and PCOF Isomers are:
(1) Simultaneous responses at both ion masses;
(2) Chlorine Isotope ratio within + 15% of the
theoretical value;
(3) Chromatographic retention times with In
windows determined fro* analysts of standard
mixtures;
-------
7
(4) Signal-to-noise ratio equal to or greater than
2.5 to 1.
The 2,3,7,8-substituted PCDO/PCDF isowers and the octa-CDD include
the additional criterion that they coelute within * 2 seconds of their
isotopically labelled analogs.
A most possible concentration (MPC) is calculated for samples in
which isomers of a particular chlorine congener class are not detected. The
formula used for calculating the MPC is:
MPC (ppb) - Hn x Qis x 2.5
His x W x Rf
where:
MPC » Single isomer most possible concentration (ppb);
Hn * Height of congener class isowers;
Qis * Quantity of internal standard (ng);
His • Peak height of internal standard;
W • Sample weight (g)
Rfa - Average response factor; and
2.5 * Signal-to-noise ratio.
ACCURACY AND PRECISION
The recovery of the i?C labelled internal standards which
experience the entire sample preparation is Measured by comparison to the
response of l,2,3,4-TCDO-13ci2 which is added to the extract immediately
prior to analysis. Recoveries range between 70 and 120 percent, depending
on the sample matrix. Those samples which require additional clean-up are
spiked with 2,3,7,8-TCDO-37ci4 as another reference for recovery
calculations.
Duplicate analyses are performed periodically as another means of
insuring method performance. Daily standard analysis provides a check of
instrument performance and precision. Response factor calculations are
compared with established values and are not to exceed 20 percent
-------
8
difference. Three and five point calibration curves are periodically
performed to demonstrate instrument linearity.
-------
TABLE 1. LABELLED ISOMERS FOR SAMPLE QUANTIFICATION
Isomer
Approximate Spiking Level (ng)
2I3,7,8-tetra-COF-13Ci2
2,3,7,8-tetra-CDD-13ci2
l,2,3,7,8-penta-CDF-13ci2
l,2,3,7,8-penta-COD-13Ci2
l,2,3,4,7,8-hexa-COF-13Ci2
l,2,3,6,7,8-hexa-CDO-13Ci2
l,2,3,4,6,7,8-hepta-CDO-13Ci2
l,2,3,4,6,7,8-hepta-CDF-13Ci2
10
10
10
10
35
10
25
25
25
-------
10
TABLE 1A. NATIVE ISOMERS FOR RESPONSE FACTORS AND
RETENTION TIMES
Isomer
Approximate Spiking Level (ng)
2,3,7,8-tetra-CDF
2,3,7,8-tetra-CDO
1,2,3,7,8-penta-CDF
2,3,4,7,8-penta-CDF
1,2,3,7,8-penta-COO
1,2,3,4,7,8-hexa-CDF
1,2,3,6,7,8-hexa-CDF
1,2,3,7,8,9-hexa-CDF
2,3,4,6,7,8-hexa-COF
1,2,3,6,7,8-hexa-CDD
1,2,3,4,7,8-hexa-COD
1,2,3,7,8,9-hexa-CDO
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-hepta-COF
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-hepta-COF
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-hepta-COO
Octa-CDO
Octa-COF
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
25
25
25
25
25
-------
11
TABLE 2. HRGC/HRMS OPERATING PARAMETERS
Mass Resolution
Electron Energy
Accelerating Voltage
Source Temperature
Preamplifier Gain
Electron Multiplier Gain
Column
Transfer Line Temperature,
DB-5
Injector Temperature,
DB-5
Column Temperature-Initial,
DB-5
Column Temperature-Program,
DB-5
Carrier Gas
Flow Velocity
Injection Mod*
Injection VoluM
9000-12000 (M/AM, 10% valley definition)
70 eV
4000 volts (7070H) or 6000 volts (7070E)
225-250 C
10'7 amp/volt
-106
CP Sil 88 50M or DB-5 60M
300 C
300 C
160 C
20 C/min to 240 C hold for 40 min
20 C/min to 320 C hold for 30 min
Helium
-30 en/min
Splitless
0.5-2 ML
-------
12
TABLE 3. EXACT MASSES USED FOR THE DETERMINATION OF PCDO AND PCDF
Accurate Mass Theoretical Isotope Ratio
Compound Mass 1 Mass 2 Mass I/Mass 2
Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxins 319.8965 321.8936 0.77
Tetrachlorodibenzofuraas 303.9016 305.8987 0.77
Pentachlorodibenzo-p-dioxins 355.8546 357.8517 1.54
Pentachlorodibenzofurans 339.8597 341.8567 1.54
Hexachlorodibenzo-p-dioxins 389.8156 391.8127 1.23
Hexachlorodibenzofurans 373.8207 375.8178 1.23
Heptachlorodibenzo-p-dioxins 423.7766 425.7737 1.03
Heptachlorodibenzofurans 407.7817 409.7788 1.03
Octachlorodibenzo-p-dioxins 457.7377 459.7347 0.88
Octachlorodibenzofurans 441.7428 443.7398 0.88
Tetrach1orodibenzo-p-dioxin-13ci2 331.9367 333.9338 0.77
Tetrachlorodibenzofuran-13Ci2 315.9418 317.9389 0.77
Pentach1orodibenzo-p-dioxin-13Ci2 367.8948 369.8918 1.54
Pentachlorodibenzofuran-13ci2 351.8999 353.8969 1.54
Hexachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin-13Ci2 401.8558 403.8529 1.23
Hexach1orodibenzofuran-13ci2 385.8609 387.8580 1.23
Heptach1orodibenzo-p-d1ox1n-l3Ci2 435.8168 437.8139 1.03
Heptach1orodibenzofuran-13Ci2 419.8219 421.8190 1.03
Octach1orodibenzo-p-d1ox1n-l3Ci2 469.7779 471.7749 0.88
-------
APPENDIX B
-------
APPENDIX B
Modified Method 680 for Special Analytic*! Service* Teat
Identification and Measurement of Pesticides and PCSs
by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry
November 18, 1985
For further information, contact Ann Alford-Stevens or James W. Bichclberger,
Physical and Chemical Methods Branch, Environmental Monitoring and Support
Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U. S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio 45268.
-------
-i-
1. SCOPt mO MfLICATIOM
1.1. This Bathed provides procedures for identification and measurement
of polyehlorinatad biphenyls (PCBi) and tha pesticidaa listed balow.
Thla nathod la applicable to aanplaa containing PCSa aa aingle congeners
or aa conplax mixturea, auch aa coauMrcial Aroclora. PCBa ara idantiflad
and naaaurad aa iaomar groupa (i.a., by level of chlorination). Tha
axiatanca of 209 poaaibla KB congeners makes impractical tha liating
of tha Chanleal Abatracta Sarvica Ragiatry Number (CASRt) for aach
potential method analyta. Bacauaa PCBa ara idantifiad and Matured
aa iaomar groupa, tha non-specific CASRN for aach level of chlorination
la uaad to daacriba aathod analytaa.
Analyta(a) formula
Aldrin
BMC, alpha
BHC, beta
BHC, delta
BHC, ganma
Chlordane, alpha
Chlordane, gamma
4,4'-ODD C14M10C14
4,4'-ODE C14H§Cl4
4,4'-DDT C14H9C15
Dleldrin C12H8C160
Endosulfan I C9H$C1«03S
Endosulfan IX C8H6C16O3S
Endoaulfan aulfata
Endrin
Endrin fcatone
Haptaehlor
Heptachlor apoxide
Mathoxychlor
Nonachlor, trans
PCBa
Mo noch 1 orobi pheny Is
Dichlorobiphenyis
Trichlorobiphenyls
Te traehlorohi phenyIs
Pentachloroblphenyls C12H5C15
aexaehlorobiphenyIs C12H4C1$
Reptaehlorobiphenyls C12B3C17
Octachlorohiphenyls
Monachloroblphenyls
Dacachloroblphenyl C12C110
C .
C -S
C16H15C1302
C10H5C19
C12H9C1
C12H8C12
C12H7C13
CASTO
309-00-2
319-84-6
319-85-7
319-86-8
58-89-9
5103-71-9
5103-74-2
72-54-8
72-55-9
50-29-3
60-57-1
959-98-8
33213-«5-9
1031-07-8
'2-20-8
53494-70-5
76-44-8
1024-57-3
72-4: i
39765-8C i
27323-H-8
25512-42-9
25323-68-6
26914-33-0
25429-29-2
26601-64-9
28659-71-2
31472-83-0
53742-07-7
2051-24-3
1.2 Da tact ion Halts vary aseng Mthed analytaa aad with saapla matrix,
aaapla praparatioo procaduraa, and individual aa^laa, dapmading ea th«
typ» and quantity of oth«r aaapla ccatponanta. th« followiag guidanea is
baaad on nomarous aaalyaaa of calibration solution* with OM instnas»nt
or«r a pariod of approximataly six aonths. Paaticida analytas otter than
andosulfans X and XI can bs idsntifi«d and accurataly sMSvrsd »*»an tha
injaetad aliquot contains 2 ng of ««eh analytaj tha aadosulfans raquira
-------
-2-
about 4 ng each. Detection limits for Individual PCB congeners incraaaa
with increasing number of chlorine atoms, with the detection limit for
decachlorobiphenyl being about 5-10 times higher than that of a monochloro-
biphenyl. A monochlorobiphenyl can be identified and measured when the
injected extract aliquot contains 1 ng. The detection limit for total PCBs
will depend on the number of individual PCB congeners preeent.
2. SUMMARY OF METHOD
Sample extract components are separated with capillary column gas chronatography
(GO and identified and meaaured with low resolution, electron ionization aaas
spectrcmetry (MS). An interfaced data system (OS) to control data acquisition
and to store, retrieve, and manipulate mass spectral data is essential* Two
surrogate compounds are added to moat samples before sample preparation; these
compounds are 13C12-4,4'-DDT and 13C6-gamma-BHC. Two internal standards,
chrysene-di2 *n<4 phenanthrene-dio» **• added to each sample and blank extract
before GC/MS analysis and are used to calibrate MS response. Each concentration
measurement is based on an integrated ion abundance of or.t characteristic ion.
All pesticides are identified as individual compounds, and a concentration is
calculated by relating the MS response of each compound to the MS response of
one of the two internal standards, usually the internal standard with GC retention
time nearer that of the pesticide analyte. This has been predetermined by
order of library entries with the specialized software for automated identifi-
cations and measurements.
PCBe are identified and measured as isomer groupe (i.e., by level of chlorination).
A concentration is measured for each PCB isomer group} total PCB concentration
in each sample extract is obtained by summing isomer group concentrations.
Nine selected PCB congeners are used as calibration standards, and one internal
standard, chrysene-d^, i« used to calibrate MS response.
3. DEFINITIONS
3.1 Concentration calibration solution (CAL) — A solution of PCB calibration
congeners, pesticide analytes, surrogate compounds, and internal standards
used to calibrate the mass spectrometer response.
3.2 Congener number — Throughout this method, Individual PCBs are described
with the number assigned by Ballschmiter and Zell (1). (This number is
also used to describe PCB congeners in catalogs produced by Ultra Scientific,
Hope, HI.)
3.3 Internal standard — A pure compound added to each sample and blank extract
in known amounts and used to calibrate concentration measurements of
PCBs and pesticide analytes that are sample components. The internal
standard must bm a compound that is not a sample component.
3.4 Laboratory performance check solution (LPC) — A solution of method analytes,
surrogate compounds, and internal standards used to evaluate the performance
of the GC/MS/D« with respect to a defined semxtf method criteria.
.
3.5 Laboratory reagent blank (LM) — An aliquot of extraction solvent
that is exposed to all glassware* apparatus, equipment, method reagents,
etc., that a sample extract solvent would bm exposed to. All internal
-------
-3-
standards and surrogates ars ussd with the LftB solvent, which is
concentrated to the final volume of a sample extract and is analysed
exactly the same as an saaple extract.
3.6 Laboratory surrogate spiks - measured value (LSD — The surrogete
compound concentration measured with the same procedures used to measure
sample components.
3.7 Laboratory surrogate spike - theoretical value (LS2) — The known or true
value of the concentration of surrogate compound added to the environmental
sample The known valus is determined from standard gravimetric and/or
volumetric techniques used during saaple fortification.
3.8 Surrogate compound — A compound that is not expected to be found in the
saaple, is added to the original environmental sample to monitor performance,
and is measured with the same procedures used to measure sample components.
Associated with the surrogate compound are two values, laboratory surrogate
spike - measured value (LSD and laboratory surrogate spike - theoretical
value (LS2).
4.
4.1 Interferences may be caused by contaminants in solvents* reagents, glassware,
and other saaple processing equipment* All of these materials must be
demonstrated to be free of interferences by routine analysis of laboratory
solvent blanks (LSB).
4.2 For both pesticides and PCBs, interference can be caused by the presence
of much greater quantities of other saaple components that overload the
capillary column; additional saaple extract preparation procedures must
then be used to eliminate interferences. Capillary column GC retention
times and the compound-specific characteristics of mass spectra eliminate
many interferences that formerly were of concern with pesticide/PCB
determinations with electron capture detection. The approach and identi-
fication criteria used in this method for PCBs eliminate interference by
most chlorinated compounds other than other PCBs. With the isoaer group
approach, coeluting PCBs that contain the saae number of chlorines are
identified and measured together. Therfore, coeiuting PCBs are a problem
only if they contain different number of chlorine atoms. This interference
problem is obviated by the rigorous identification criteria incorporated
into the specialised software.
5. APPARATUS AMD tOOIPMPIT
5.1 COMPOTIiaaD OC/NI fTITBM
5.1.1 The <3C must be capable of temperature programming and be equipped
with all required accessories, such a* syringes, gases, and a capillary
column, the GC injection port murt be deeigned for capillary columns.
Manual splitless injections were used to acquire data used as the basis
for quality control requirements. An automatic injector, however, is
desirable, because it should provide more precis* retention times and
areas. Oo-coluan injection techniques are encouraged becaas« they
minimise high mass descrimination and analyte degradation problems.
-------
with some GCs, however, the irreproducibility of the low initial
temperature required for on-column injections will cause irrepro-
ducible retention times (RTs) and relative retention times (RRTs).
That can result in an inability to distinguish between two closely
sluting pesticide isomers. Splitting injections are not recommended.
5.1.2 Pull range mass spectra are obtained with electron ionization at a
nominal electron energy of 70 ev. To ensure sufficient prscision of
mass spectral data, the required MS scan rate euat allow acquisition
of at least five full-range aass spectra whil* a sample component
elutee from the GC. The MS aust produce a BASS spectrum meeting all
usual eritsria for <2Q ng of decafluorotriphenylphoephine (DFTPP)
introduced through the GC inlet.
5.1.3 An interfaced data system (OS) is required to acquire, store, reduce,
and output mass spectral data. The DS must be capable of searching
a data file for specific ions and plotting ion abundances versus tine
or spectrum number to produce extracted ion current profiles (EICPs:.
Also required is the capability to obtain chroma to graphic peak areas
between specified times or spectrum numbers in CICPs. Total data
acquisition time per cycle should be £0.5 s and must not exceed 1.5 s.
5.2 GC COLUMN -- A 30 m X 0.32 mm ID fused silica capillary column coated with
a 0.25 urn or thicker film crosslinked phenyl methyl silicons (such as
Durabond-5 (DB-5), J and W Scientific, Rancho Cordova, CA) or polydiphenyl
vinyl dimethyl siloxane (such as SE-S4, Alltech Associates, Deerfield, ID
is required. Operating conditions known to produce acceptable results with
these columns era shown in Table 1; separation of pesticide analytes and PCS
calibration congeners with a DB-5 column aad those operating conditions is
shown in Figure 1. Retention times have been reported (2) for all 209 PCS
congeners with an SE-54 column, which provides the same retention order for
PCBs and sssentially the same seperation capabilities aa a DB-5 column.
5.3 MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT
5.3.1 Volumetric flacks - various common sises with ground glass stoppers
5.3.2 Microsyriages - various common sisea
6. REAGENTS AMD COMJCMAJL1 MATERIALS
6.1 SOLVENTS — High purity, distilled-in-glass.
6.2 MS PERFOBMAftCZ CMC* SOLUTION — Prepare a 10 ag/uL solution of decafluoro-
tripheaylpacephiae (OFT**) ia aa appropriate eoli '
6.3 IWTXWAL StMlDABDS — Chrysene-d12 sad phenaathreae-d^Q are used as internal
standards. They are added to each sample extract just before analysis and are
contained ia all concentration calibration aad performance cheek solutions.
A solution of internal standards is provided.
6.4 SGMOGMB COMOONM — 13C12-4,4'-OOT aad 1 ^-gassta-BBC are added to every
blank aad to «ost samples before extraction and are included ia every concen-
tration calibration/ performance check solution, mequired solutions of
surrogate compounds; arm provided.
-------
-5-
6.5 PCI COiemTRATIOII CALI1RATION CONGSNCRS — The nine individual PCB congeners
Uated in Table 2 are uaed a* concentration calibration compounda for PCB
determination*, one iaomer at each level of chlorination ia uaed aa the
concentration calibration atandard for all other iaomera at that level of
chlorination, except that decachlorobiphenyl (C110) ia uaed for both cig
and Clio iiomer groups. The needed solution of PCB congeners ia provided.
6.6 PKSTICIOC CALIBRATION SOLUTION — Provided.
6.10 CALIBRATION SOLUTIONS (CALa) — Five hexane solutions are required.
Inatruction* for preparation of CALS are provided with the PCB calibration
congener solution. CALa contain a constant concentration of the iSa
(chry*ene-dij and phenanthrene-d^g) and varying eoncentrationa of the
individual staticIda analytae. the nine PCB calibration congeners, and
the two aurrasate compound* ( C12-ODT and Cg-gamaa-BHC). (Composition and
concentrations are given in Table 3.) Each solution contains both iss, both
surrogate compounda, the nine PCB concentration calibration congeners, and
each of the single-compound pesticide analytea. The lowest concentration
solution contains each individual pesticide analytes and PCB calibration
congener at a concentration near but greater than its anticipated detection
limit. (Becauae MS reaponae to PCBa decreaaea with increasing level of
chlorination, PCB congener concentration* ia CALS lacreaae with level of
chlorination.) Component* of the higheet concentration CAL are preaent at
a concentration that allow* injection* of 2-uL aliquot* without MS saturation
or GC column overloading.
6.11 LABORATORY PERFORMANCE CHECK SOLUTION — The medium concentration CAL (#3,
Table 3) ia uaed aa the laboratory performance cheek aolution (LPC) to verify
responae factor* and to demonatrate adequate GC resolution and MS performance.
7. CALIBRATION
Demonstration and documentation of initial calibration are required before any
saaplee are analysed and intermittently throughout sample analyee* aa dictated by
results of continuing calibration checka. After initial calibration ia success-
fully performed, a continuing calibration check ia required at the beginning and
end of each 12-h period during which analyses are performed.
7.1. INITIAL CALIBRATION
7.1.1 Calibrate and tune the MS with atandard* aad procedure* prescribed
by the manufacturer with any neceaaary modification* to meet 08DA
requir*a*nts.
7.1.2 Inject a 2-uL aliquot of the 10 ng/uL DTTPP solution aad acquire a
ease spectrum that includes data for m/t 45-450. If the apectrum
doea not meet all u*u*l criteria, the MS mu*t be hardware tuned to
meet all criteria before proceeding with calibration.
7.1.3 Inject a 2-uL aliquot of the medium concentration CAL and acquire
data from m/s 45 to 510. Acquire £5 spectra during elution of each
GC peak. Total cycle time ahould be £0.5 • aad O.S a.
-------
7.1.4 Performance Criteria
7.1.4.1 cc performance — baseline separation of beta-iHC and
gaama-BHCt baa* line aeparation of andrin katone and
chryaana-d12» height of Cl^-PCl peak >80% bata-iHC peak
height; height of chrysene-d^ peak £20% of tha paak height
of mathoxyehlor coeluting with tha Clg-PCB conga nar. (If
nathoxychlor and Clg-PCB ara reaolved, chryaana-d12 paak
height • £40% of aaeh.)
7.1.4.2 MS aanaitivity — Signal/noiae ratio of >S for »/r 499 of
PCS congener *209, C110-PCB. *
7.1.4.3 MS calibration — Abundance of >40% and <_60% of m/t 502
ralativa to «/x 498 for PCI conganar 12097
7.1.4.4 Lack of dagradation of andrin. Exaaina an axtractad ion
currant prof ila (BICP) for m/z 67 in tha ratantion tina
window batwaan 4,4-OOC and andoaulfan aulfata; confirm
that tha abundanca of m/z 67 at tha ratantion tima of
andrin aldahyda (Saa Figura 1) is <10% of tha abundanca of
m/z 67 producad by andrin.
7.1.4.5 Lack of dagradation of 13C12-4,4'-ODT. Exaaina CZCPa for
m/z 25S and a/z 247 in tha ratantion tiaa window that
includaa 4,4'-DDD/ 4, 4 '-DM! and 4, 4 '-DOT; m/z 258 would ba
producad by 13C12-4,4'DDE, and m/z 247 by ^C^^^'-OOO.
Confirm that tha total abundanca of both iona ia <5% of
m/z 247 producad by 13C12-4,4'-DDT.
7.1.5 Raplicata Xnalyaaa of CALa — Zf all parformanca critaria ara mat,
analyza aach of tha othar four CALa.
7.1.6 Rasponaa Factor Calculation
7.1.6.1 Calculata fiva raaponaa factors (KFa) for aaeh paaticida
analyta, PCI calibration conganar, aad aurrogata compound
ralatira to aithar phananthrana-d^o °£ chryaana-d^-
(Phananthrana-dio i> uaad for paaticidaa aluting bafora
haptachlor apoxida; Chryaana-d^ i* uaad for all PCBa and
for haptachlor apoxida and latar aluting paaticidaa.)
Uaa standard Zneoa procaduraa to calculate aach RT:
whara AX • integrated lea abundance of qoantitation
ion for a peetieide« a tCB calibration
coneaner or a •urroeate eoapo^id,
inteorated ion abundance of a/z 240, the
qoantitation lea when ohryeene-d^ i*
as the internal standard or a/s 188, the
qvaatltatloa lea when pheaanthrene-d10
is used as the Internal standard,
-------
-7-
git • injected quantity of chrysene-d12 or
phenanthrene-d10,
Qx • injected quantity of pesticide analyte, PCS
calibration congener or surrogate compound.
Rf is a unitless number, units used to express quantities
must be wuivalent.
7.1.7 Response factor Raproducibility — for each pesticide analyte, PCS
calibration congener and surrogate compound, calculate the mean Rf
from analyses of each of the five CALS. when the USD exceeds 20%,
analyze additional aliquota of appropriate CALS to obtain an acceptabli
RSD of Rfs over the entire concentration range, or take action to
improve CC/MS performance.
7.1.8 Record a spectrum of each CAL component. (Background subtraction
and spectrum averaging may be needed.) Judge the acceptability of
recorded spectra by comparing them to spectra in libraries and by
using information in Tables 4-6. If an acceptable spectrum of
a pesticide analyte or PCB calibration congener is not acquired,
take necessary actions to correct GC/MS performance. If performance
cannot be corrected, report sample extract data for the particular
compound(s), but document the affected compound(s) and the nature
of the problem.
7.2. CONTINUING CALIBRATION CHECK
7.2.1 with the following procedures, verify initial calibration at the
beginning and end of each 12-h period during which analyses are to
be performed.
7.2.2 Calibrate and tune the MS with standards and procedures prescribed
by the manufacturer.
7.2.3 Analyse a 2-uL aliquot of the DFTVr solution and ensure
acceptable M calibration and performance.
7.2.4 Inject a 2-uL aliquot of CAL 13 (Table 3) and analyze with the same
conditions usad during Initial Calibration.
7.2.5 Demonstrate acceptable performance for criteria described in Sect.
7.1.4.
7.2.6 Determine that neither the area measured for m/s 240 for chry*ene-d12
nor that for m/s 1tt for phenanthrane-d1 Q has decreased by sore than 2 Si
from the area measured in the most recent previous analysis of a
calibration solution and by more than 50% from the mean area measured
during initial calibration.
7.2.7 w Reproducibility - For an acceptable Continuing Calibration Check,
the measured IV for each analyte/surrogata compound must be within
+20% of the mean value calculated (Sect. 7.1.6) during Initial
Calibration. If not, remedial action most be taken; recallbration
may be necessary.
-------
•9-
7.2.t Remedial actions must be taken if criteria ara not mat; poaaibla
remedies arai
t
7.2.1.1 check and adjust GC and/or MS operating condition*.
7.2.a.2 Claan or raplaea injector liner.
7.2.8.3 Fluah column with aolvant according to manufacturers
instructiona.
7.2.8.4 Braak off 4 ahort portion (approximately 0.33 •) of the
column* check column parfomanca by analyaia of performance
chack aolution.
7.2.8.5 Raplaea <3C coluoni parfomanca of all initial calibration
procaduraa than required.
7.2.8.6 Ad^uat MS for greater or laaaar raaolution.
7.2.8.7 Calibrate MS mast scala.
7.2.8.8 Parform initial calibration procaduraa.
8. PROCTOUMS
8.1 GC/MS ANALYSIS
8.1.1 Remove the sample extract or blank froa storage and allow it to warn
to ambient laboratory temperature if neceaaary. With a stream of
dry, filtered nitrogen, reduce the extract/blank volume to the
appropriate volume. Final volume for all blanks and all samples
except ORO-11 ia 1 mL; final volume for ORD-11 ia 10 mL. (See
attached flow chart for axtract preparation scheme for solid samples.)
If sample OKS-11, add 200 uL of the IS solution! otherwise, add 20 uL
of the IS solution. Internal standard concentration • 7.5 ng/uL of
axtract.
8.1.2 Inject a 2-uL aliquot of the extract/blank into the GC operated under
conditions used to produce acceptable reaulta during calibration.
8.1.3 Acquire mass spectral data with the same data acquiaition time and
QC/MS operating conditions previously used to determine response
factors*
8.1.4 Examine data for saturated ioas ia mass spectra of target compounds,
if saturation occurred, dilute aad reaaalyse the extract after the
quantity of the IBs is adjusted appropriately.
8.1.5 Per each IS, determine that the area measured ia the sample extract
has not decreased by >25% froa the area measured during the most
recent previous analyaia of a calibration solution or by >SO% from
the mesa area measured during initial calibration. If either criterio
is not mat, remedial action must be takem to improve sensitivity,
aad the sample extract aust be reaaalysed.
-------
-9-
1.2 IDCWTIflCATIOW MO NKStJKlNENT PHOCtDUMS — Oit toft war* for automated
identification and eaasuraaent of KB* and peeticidea. (See Uteri' Guide)
8.2.1 Uae the grand Man RF calculated during Initial Calibration.
CAOTION: For PCI analyse* with auteaated data Intarpratation a
linear fit algorithm will produce erroneoue concentration data.
8.2.2 Examine reeults obtained on the statue report (for individual
ccaponenta identified aa PCla) and the quantitation report (for
peaticide analytea) and PCB isoaor groupe. Individual spectra
•hould be exaained and cceipared to appropriate apectra acquired
during calibration.
8.2.2 Report calculated value* to three aignificant figure*.
1. Ballachmiter/ K. and M. Zell, Freaenlua 2. Anal. Che«., 302, 20, 1980.
2. Mullin, N. 0.,. C. Pochini, S. McCrindie, M. Romkea, S. I. Safe, and
L. H. Safe, "High Resolution PCB Analyaiat Syntheaia and ChrcBatographie
Properties of All 209 PCB Congener*", Environ. Sci. Technol. 18, 466, 1984.
3. Rote, J. H. and w. J. Morris, "Uae of loatopic Abundance Ratio* in
Identification of Poly chlorinated Biphenyla by Haas Spectroaetry",
J. Aasoc. Offie. Anal. Chern. 56(1), 188, 1973.
-------
.10-
Table 1. tecommended QC Operating Condition*
Coluan Type:
Film Thickness:
Coluan Dimension*:
Helium Linear Velocity:
Temperature Program for Splitless
Injection:
(Analysis time *
approximately 40 Bin)
31-54 or 01-5
£0.25 ua
30 m X 0.32 mm
28-29 o/see
at 250»C
Inject at 80*C and hold 1 min;
increase at 30Vain to 160*C and
hold 1 min; ^.-.crease at 3Vmin to
310«C.
•3T
Inject at 80•: and hold 1 min; heat
rapidly to 1«0«C and hold 1 min»
increase at 3*/min to 310»C.
-------
• 11-
Tabls 2. Kl Congeners Ossd as Concentration Calibration Standards
IsoBer Group
Congener Chlorine
Number Substitution
Approx.
ROT*
Monochlorobiphtnyl 1
Dichlorobiphenyl 5
Trichlorobiphenyl 29
Tetrachlorobiphenyl SO
P«ntachlorobiph«nyl 37
Hexachlorobiphenyl 154
Haptachlorobiphenyl 188
Octachlorobiphenyl 200
Honachlorobipheny1*
D«cachlorobiph«nyl 209
2 0.30
2,3 0.43
2,4,5 0.54
2,2',4,6 Q.S6
2,2',3,4,5' 0.80
2,2',4,4',5,6' 0.82
2,2',3,4',5,6,6' 0.88
2,2',3,3',4,S'/6,6I 1.03
2,2',3,3',4,4',5,5',6,6' 1.3
* Retention time relative to ehrysene-d.,. with • 30 ax 0.31 on:
fused silica capillary eoluan and the following OC conditionsi
ID SE-54
splitless
injection at 80»Ci hold for 1 aim heat rapidly to 160«C and hold 1 min;
increase at 3*C/sdn to 310«C.
Decachloroblphenyl is used as the calibration congener for both nona-
and decacfalorofciphenyl isosier groups*
-------
-13-
Ttbl« 4. Known Ml*tiv« Abund>nc«a of Zone in KB Molecular Zen Cluatera
m/z
Zntenaltv
Monochloroblphenyla
188 100
189 13.5
190 33.4
192 4.41
Dichlorobiphanyla
222 100
223 13.5
224 66.0
225 8.82
226 11.2
227 1.44
Trichlorobiphanyla
256 100
257 13.5
258 96.6
259 13.2
260 32.7
261 4.31
262 3.73
263 0.47
T«tr«chlorobiphenyla
290 76.2
291 10.3
292 100
293 13.4
294 49.4
295 6.57
296 11.0
297 1.43
298 0.9S
P«ntachlorobdpfcenyla
324 61.0
325 8.26
326 100
327 13.S
32S 65.7
329 8.71
330 21.7
331 2.84
332 3.62
333 0.47-^
334 0.25
i/x
Relative
Zntenaity
Kexachlorobiphenyla
358 50.9
359 6.89
360 100
361 13.5
362 82.0
363 11.0
364 36.0
365 4.77
366 8.92
367 1.17
368 1.20
369 0.15
Hepta chlorobipheny la
Relative
Znteneity
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
43.7
5.91
100
13.5
98.3
13.2
53.8
7. 16
17.7
2.34
3.52
0.46
0.40
Octachlorobiphenyla
426 33.4
427 4.51
428 87.3
429 11.8
430 100
431 13.4
432 65.6
433 8.76
434 26.9
435 3.57
436 7. 10
437 0.93
438 I.It
439 0.15
440 0.11
Nonachlorobiphanyla
460 26.0
461 3.51
462 76.4
463 10.3
464 100
465 13.4
466 76.4
467 10.2
468 37.6
469 S.OO
470 12.4
471 1.63
472 2.72
473 0.35
474 0.39
Decachlorobiphenyl
494 20.8
495 2.81
496 68.0
497 9.17
498 100
499 13.4
500 87.3
501 11.7
502 50.0
503 6.67
504 19.7
505 2.61
506 5.40
507 0.71
508 1.02
509 0.13
Sources J. N. Mote and V. J. Horria, J. Aaaoc. Offic. Anal.
56, 186, 1973.
-------
-14-
Tabl* 9. Suantitation, Confirmation, and Interference Check lent for K3«.
Internal Standard*, and Surrogate Coapounda
M-70 Interftn
Analyte/ Approx. Men. Qjant. Confirm. Cxpaeted Accept. Confirm. Checkli
IS/Surr. R*T Man?* HW ion Ion Ratio* Ratio* ion M+70 *
PCS laomer Group
"1
«2
«3
"4
"5
"6
C17
«•
C19
Clio
Internal
0.30-0.35
0.38-0.50
0.46-0.64
0.55-0.82
0.64-C.92
0.75-1.1
0.88-1.2
0.99-1.21
1.16-1.28
1.3
standard
Chrys«ne-d12
Phe nanthr ene-d^ Q
188
222
256
290
324
358
392
426
460
494
240
188
188
222
256
292
326
360
394
430
464
498
240
188
190
224
258
290
324
362
396
428
466
500
241
189
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
5
6
.0
.5
.0
.3
.6
.2
.0
.1
.3
.1
.1
.6
2.
1.
0.
1.
1.
1.
0.
0.
1.
0.
4.
6.
5-3
3-1
8-1
1-1
4-1
0-1
8-1
9-1
1-1
9-1
3-5
0-7
.5
.7
.2
.5
.8
.4
.2
.3
.5
.3
.9
.2
152b 256
152 292
186 326
220 360
254 394
288 430
322 464
356 498
390
424
-
22
25
29
32
36
39
43
46
41
•
-
Surrogate compound
13C'-J
UBB-8K
1,4 '•DOT
294
364
187
247
189
249
1
.5
1.
1-1
1.2-1
.4
.8
.
- -
.
«
• Ratio of quaatitatioa ion to conf ixMtioa ion
b MooodichloroMpheayls love Kl to produce an lea at •/• 152*
-------
I I
O
O
o
Cndos
? .*
o. *•
•i
**• A
a o
2 tf
* i
H- 9
mn
or
ph«-ch
d*n
I
c
K
5>-
o
» &
s
n an
! !
i n
3- £
S
Aldrin
i •
f» ft
s s
£ s
o n
M
h«n«nthr
0
•o
ft
«
O
fcj i** 4** «V «^
^1 -. ~J ^ O
• Ok a> o 0k
o o
f
Ul Ul M Kl _. K»
-4 ID at so
o at at *>
01 0» Ok
o
M
O
0
J
3
S
8
s
•4
e
m
o
e
o
•
o
at
0
0
-J
o
Ok
o
-j
Ok
o
-J
o
o
0
0
at
o
0
o
o
o
o
M M
Ul «J
O
«o
-J «O
ift
Ul
Ul «O «O «O
M
M
Uk Uk
vO O -N|
-• Ul
«O -J
o» o ao at »
o -• at ^i
II§iII§ii§i||i||rriliilii
8sSst{ti§uiuis^So^t:tiu:sM»£«»»»
23«3*»-3«» " »4UI*UI MO»««««UlU»ul
siisslssissssssassiisiiil
e S
ut
Uk Ul
m Ok M K>
Uk Ok -• -»
m uk «k ^i
«^ _- o o
KJ Kl
Uk _._._•
>o «o >o
0-4-4-4
v Uk O O
n
ft
-------
It. feaytacfclor apomi
.f«n«ra and Paaticida Aaalytaa.
-------
-------
APPENDIX B
ASH RESULTS
R339911
-------
(ZA) ASH
CAMPLE NUMBER:
liUJUTION FACTOR:
LJESCRIPTION:
UNITS:
ZA AH 001
ASH
UG/KG
ZA AH UW.
ASH
ZA AH 003
1
ASH
UU/KG
ZA AH-003D
20
ASH
UG/KG
ZA AH-004
ASH
ZA-AH-005
ASH
*** BASE/NEUTRALS ***
PP CAS NO COMPOUND
66B 117-81-7 BIS(2-ETHYLHBXYL)PHTHALATE NA
69B 117-84-0 DI N-OCTYL PHTHAIATB HA
68B 84-74-2 DI-N-BUTYL PHTHAUTK NA
NA
NA
NA
250000
2000T
430JB
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
-------
IZA) ASH
P.AMPLK NUMBER:
HILUT10N FACTOR:
DESCRIPTION:
UNITS:
ZA All 001
ASH
ZA All 002
ASH
*«* ACIDS »+*
PP CAS NO OOMPCHIND
NO PARAMETERS DETECTED FOR THIS CATEGORY
ZA All 003
ASH
IKi/KC
ZA All 0031)
IIC/KC
ZA All 004
ASH
ZA-AH-005
ASH
CO
ro
-------
(ZA) ASH
SAMPLE NUMBER:
DILUTION FACTOR:
DESCRIPTION:
UNITS:
*** PESTICIDES ***
PP CAS NO COMPOUND
DICHLOROBIPHBNYL
ZA-AH-001
ASH
UG/KG
NA
ZA-AH-002
ASH
ZA-AH-003
ASH
UG/KG
ZA-AH-003D
ASH
UG/KG
ZA-AH-004
ASH
ZA-AH-005
ASH
NA
107
NA
NA
NA
<*>
-------
(ZA) ASH
SAMPLE NUMBER:
DILUTION FACTOR:
DESCRIPTION:
UNITS:
00
I
2378 TCDD
TOTAL TCDD
2378 TCDF
TOTAL TCDF
12378 PeCDD
TOTAL PeCDD
12378 PeCDF
23478 PeCDF
TOTAL PeCDF
123478 HxCDD
123678 HxCDD
123789 HxCDD
TOTAL HxCDD
123478 HxCDF
123678 HxCDF
1237B9 HxCDF
234678 HxCDF
TOTAL HxCDF
1234678 HpCDD
TOTAL HpCDD
1234678 HpCDF
1234789 HpCDF
TOTAL HpCDF
OCDD
OCDF
ZA AH-001
ASH
ZA-AH-002
ASH
ZA-AH-003
ASH
ZA-A1I-003D
ASH
ZA-AH-0M
ASH
ZA AH-005
ASH
10
216
263
1951
33
350
61
46
591
12
17
28
211
74
131
36
5
527
159
299
139
8
19B
313
66
Dioxin Results are in pg/g
Note: Only 1 Ash Sample Fran This Facility Has Analyzed For Dioxins.
-------
(ZA) ASH
SAMPLE NIIHBER:
PIUITIOH FACTOR:
OESCRIITION:
UNITS:
ZA AM 00!
ASM
MG/Kti
ZA All 002
ASH
MU/KG
ZA All 003
ASH
MG/KG
All -0030
ASH
ZA AII-004
ASH
HO/KG
ZA-AH-006
ASH
MG/KG
CO
i
01
*<* INORGANICS ***
HP CAS NO OOMPOUND
3
4
6
8
JO
11
12
14
IS
19
20
24
ARSENIC
BARIUM
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
COPPER
IRON
I .BAD
MANGANESE
MERCURY
SILVER
SODIUM
ZINC
50
529
43
93
1420
63300
1580
1020
10.4
4.8
10200
6900
4(10
41
90
7360
57400
1180
835
22.9
5.0
9970
4310
51
554
56
79
1160
48600
1820
849
25.1
8.7
11000
6600
45
523
32
64
994
44100
1480
1360
16.9
4.1
9350
4740
37
436
41
55
946
46000
1660
587
18.0
7.9
10400
4540
-------
(ZA) ASH
SAMPLE NUMBER:
DIUJTION FACTOR:
DESCRIPTION:
UNITS:
ZA-AH-001
ASH
MG/KG
ZA AH-002
ASH
MG/KG
ZA-AH 003
ASH
MG/KG
ZA AH-003D
ASH
ZA-AH-004
ASH
MG/KG
ZA-AH-005
ASH
MG/KG
*** GEOCHEMICAL PARAMETERS ***
PP CAS NO COMPOUND
PH
MOISTURE CONTENT X
TOC
TOTAL SOLUBLE SOLIDS
AMMONIA
NITRATE
ORTHO PHOSPHATE
TOTAL ALKALINITY
CHLORIDE
SULFATE
ALUMINUM OXIDE X
CALCIUM OXIDE X
MAGNESIUM OXIDE X
POTASSIUM MONOXIDE X
SILICON DIOXIDE X
11.83
0.9
18100
52400
4.47
2.86
<0.05
7540
18300
5020
ft.52
20.5
1.38
1.20
22.4
11.85
1.9
22000
49800
2.89
2.29
<.0.05
8000
17800
4800
9.37
20.3
1.33
1.10
22.2
11.79
1.6
11400
50400
5.98
2.22
<0.05
7730
23700
6100
9.0
22.2
1.31
1.24
21.9
11.80
1.1
23400
46500
11.5
2.54
<0.05
8100
19100
4620
9.23
15.1
1.50
1.20
27.3
11.68
1.7
35600
48400
5.98
4.23
<0.05
8050
16300
3770
9.85
18.4
1.21
1.15
43.8
-------
(ZB) ASH
SAMPLE NUMBER:
IULUTION FACTOR:
DESCRIPTION:
UNITS:
ZB-AH 001
ASH
UG/KG
ZB AH 002
Af.H
ZB-AH -003
ASH
ZB AH 004
ASH
ZB AH-005
ASH
+** BASE/NEUTRALS ***
PP CAS NO OOMPOUND
66B 117 81 7 B1S(2 ETHYLHEXYDPHTHAUTE 610JB NA NA NA NA
-------
(ZB) ASH
SAMPLE NUMBER:
DILUTION FACTOR:
DESCRIPTION:
UNITS:
ZB-AH-001
ASH
UG/KG
*** ACIDS ***
PP CAS NO OQMPOUND
NO PARAMETERS DETECTED FOR THIS CATBOORY
ZB AH-002
ASH
ZB AH 003
ASH
ZB AH 004
ASH
ZB AH-005
ASH
00
-------
(ZB) ASH
SAMPLE NUMBER:
DILUTION FACTOR:
DESCRIPTION:
UNITS:
ZB A}] 001
ASH
ZP-AH 002
ASH
ZB AH -003
ASH
ZB AH 004
ASH
ZB Ail 005
ASK
1"
10
2378 TCDD
TOTAL TCDD
2378 TCDF
TOTAL TCDF
12378 PeCDD
TOTAL PeCDD
12378 PeCDF
23478 PeCDF
TOTAL PeCDF
123478 HxCDD
123678 HxCDD
123789 HxCDD
TOTAL HxCDD
123478 HxCDF
123678 HxCDF
123789 HxCDF
234678 HxCDF
TOTAL HxCDF
1234678 HpCDD
TOTAL.HpCDD
1234678 HpCDF
1234789 HpCDF
TOTAL HpCDF
OCDD
OCDF
24
375
617
4338
118
877
194
162
1883
40
34
79
495
330
524
127
54
1980
319
607
539
48
784
544
243
Dioxin Results are In pg/g
-------
(ZB) ASH
SAMPLE NUMBER:
UILUTION FACTOR:
DESCRIPTION:
UNITS:
ZB All 001
ASM
MC/KG
7.B All 002
ASK
MO/KG
ZB All 003
ASH
MG/KG
ZB-AII 004
ASH
MG/KG
ZB AH 005
ASH
MG/KG
*** INORGANICS ***
PP CAS NO COMPOUND
5
.1
4
6
a
10
11
12
14
15
18
19
20
24
ARSENIC
BARIUM
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
COPPER
IRON
LEAD
MANGANESE
MERCURY
SELENIUM
SILVER
SODIUM
ZINC
28
484
52
53
9330
18800
1070
508
8.2
5.7
6.9
6200
8580
45
322
152
74
1370
19300
1630
559
11
9.4
9210
6480
31
1000
64
67
674
13600
1490
622
7.7
6.0
8940
4360
56
260
57
118
842
21500
1420
846
8.0
10
9810
15800
54
283
58
65
4440
22200
1740
515
12
5.4
10600
6450
-------
(ZB) ASH
SAMPI.E NUMBER:
DILUTION FACTOR:
DESCRIPTION:
UNITS:
ZB-AH-001
ASH
MG/KG
ZB-AH 002
ASH
MG/KG
ZB AH-003
ASH
MG/KG
ZB-AH-004
ASH
MG/KG
ZB-AH-005
ASH
MG/KG
*** GEOCHEMICAL PARAMETERS ***
PP CAS NO COMPOUND
P«
MOISTURE CONTENT X
TOC
TOTAL SOLUBLE SOLIDS
AMMONIA
NITRATE
ORTHO PHOSPHATE
TOTAL ALKALINITY
CHLORIDE
SULFATB
ALUMINUM OXIDE X
CALCIUM OXIDE X
MAGNESIUM OXIDE X
POTASSIUM MONOXIDE X
SILICON DIOXIDE X
11.48
4.5
14600
36700
3.69
2.65
<0.05
4520
18600
963
8.46
19.4
1.40
0.941
2fl.9
10.91
5.1
29600
65800
10.6
2.75
<0.05
1590
44200
764
10.3
22.3
1.62
0.827
22.1
11.49
2.7
22800
44000
3.93
1.45
<0.05
5150
19500
3130
9.35
21.2
1.45
0.938
29.4
11.59
3.8
29400
45300
4.85
2.09
<0.05
6650
26000
2440
9.26
20.6
1.54
0.912
28.2
11.67
8.8
17000
55300
4.76
2 67
<0.05
6320
31400
1340
7.39
25.7
1.19
O.R66
19.0
-------
(ZC) ASH
SAMPLE NUMBER:
IUUJTION FACTOR:
DESCRIPTION:
UNITS:
+** BASE/NEUTRALS *»*
PP CAS NO OOHPOUND
66B 117-81-7
6flB 84-74 2
BIS( 2-KTHYlHHXYUPHTHAUTE
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHAUTB
ZC AH-001
ASH
NA
NA
ZC AH 002
ASH
NA
NA
ZC AH 003
1
ASH
UO/KG
310JB
400JB
ZC AH 004
ASH
NA
NA
ZC-AH-005
ASH
NA
NA
f
K-»
ro
-------
(ZC) ASH
SAMPU NUMBER:
HU.UTION FACTOR:
liEHCRlPTION:
UNITS:
ZC AH-001
AKH
ZC AH 002
Af,H
*** AC I [G ***
PP CAS NO COMPOUND
ZC AH 003
ASH
UG/KG
ZC AH-004
ASH
ZC-AH-005
ASH
NO PARAMETERS DETECTED FOR THIS CATEGORY
-------
(ZC) ASH
SAMPLE NUMBER:
DILUTION FACTOR:
DESCRIPTION:
UNITS:
2378 TCDD
TOTAL TCDD
2378 TCDF
TOTAL TCDF
12378 PeCDD
TOTAL PeCDD
12378 PeCDF
23478 PeCDF
TOTAL PeCDF
123478 HxCDD
123678 HxCDD
123789 HxCDD
TOTAL HxCDD
123478 HxCDF
123678 HxCDF
123789 HxCDF
23467B HxCDF
TOTAL HxCDF
1234678 HpCDD
TOTAL HpCDD
1234678 HpCDF
1234789 HpCDF
TOTAL HpCDF
OCDD
OCDF
ZC-AH-001
AGH
ZC-AH-002
ASH
ZC-AH 003
ASH
1C
297
236
1444
71
1122
64
56
727
66
90
120
1201
218
279
193
70
139f.
1849
3360
653
83
990
6!)06
563
ZC All-004
ASH
ZC AH 005
ACH
Dloxin Results are in pg/g
-------
(ZC) ASH
: .ANI'LE NUMBER:
DIIAJTION FACTOR:
INSCRIPTION:
UNITS:
ZC All 001
ASM
HG/KG
ZC All 002
ASH
MG/KG
ZC All 003
ASH
MG/KG
ZC AH 004
ASH
MG/KG
ZC AH -00!>
ASH
MG/KG
*** INORGANICS ***
PP CAS NO COMPOUND
VI
3
4
6
8
10
11
12
14
10
19
20
24
ARSENIC
BARIUM
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
COPPER
IRON
LEAD
MANGANESE
MERCURY
SILVER
SODIUM
ZINC
31
213
42
51
1150
21300
23BO
1200
1.8
8.8
8630
4660
36
193
49
53
524
20000
2580
826
1.1
12
8940
7170
30
248
52
57
4470
23500
1760
898
2.3
5.8
7940
4390
28
314
47
45
758
22100
2630
565
3.2
5.6
8040
4180
29
331
48
48
547
25000
1710
518
17
6.0
7370
4110
-------
(ZC) ASH
SAMPLE NUMBER:
DIUmON FACTOR:
DESCRIPTION:
UNITS:
ZC-AH-001
ASH
MG/KG
ZC-AH 002
ASH
MG/KG
ZC-AH-003
ASH
MG/KG
ZC-AH-004
ASH
MG/KG
ZC-AH-005
ASH
MG/KG
*** GEOCHEMICAL PARAMETERS ***
PP CAS NO COMPOUND
pH
MOISTURE CONTENT X
TOC
TOTAL SOLUBLE SOLIDS
AMMONIA
NITRATE
ORTHO PHOSPHATE
TOTAL ALKALINITY
CHLORIDE
SULFATE
ALUMINUM OXIDE X
CALCIUM OXIDE %
MAGNESIUM OXIDE X
POTASSIUM MONOXIDE X
SILICON DIOXIDE X
11.75
1.0
9020
24600
1.49
6.46
<0.05
2690
5160
7670
8.64
9.7
1.02
0.875
62.9
11.82
1.5
12300
22000
1.86
0.11
<0.05
2970
3870
5900
7.96
11.4
1.17
1.07
53.8
11.58
2.0
14100
23600
1.40
0.09
<0.05
1210
4180
7400
6.67
10.8
1.3
1.04
48.4
11.82
0.6
9830
23000
1.33
0.14
<0.05
2840
5860
9060
6.65
10.3
1.08
1.03
57.0
11.74
1.4
17800
26100
2.10
0.28
<0.05
3040
5280
10300
5.93
10.6
1.11
0.992
49.5
-------
(ZD) ASH
.SAMPLE NUMBER:
DILUTION FACTOR:
DESCRIPTION:
UNITS:
ZD-AH 001
ASH
ZD-AH 002
ASH
1
ASH
UG/KG
ZD AH 004
ASH
ZfrAH 005
ASH
*»* BASE/NEUTRAI£ ***
PP CAS NO COMPOUND
66B 117-81-7
68B 84 74-2
39B 206 44-0
H1B 85-01-8
BIS(2 ETHYLHKXYDPHTHALATE
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHAIATE
FLUORANTHENE
PHENANTHRENE
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
390JB
270J
170J
310J
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
-------
(ZD) ASH
SAMPLE NUMBER:
DILUTION FACTOR:
DESCRIPTION:
UNITS:
zn AH-001
ASH
ZD AH 002
ASH
Zl> AH 003
ASH
DO/KG
ZD--AH-004
ASH
ZD AH 005
ASH
*** ACIDS ***
PP CAS NO COMPOUND
NO PARAMETERS DETECTED FOR THIS CATEGORY
T
-------
(Zf>) ASH
SAMPLE NUMBER:
DILUTION FACTOR:
DESCRIPTION:
UNITS:
T
2378 TCDD
TOTAL TCDD
2378 TCDF
TOTAL TCDF
12378 PeCDD
TOTAL PeCDD
12378 PeCDF
23478 PeCDF
TOTAL PeCDF
123478 HxCDD
123678 HxCDD
123789 HxCDD
TOTAL HxCDD
123478 HxCDF
123678 HxCDF
123789 HxCDF
234678 HxCDF
TOTAL HxCDF
1234678 HfCDD
TOTAL HpCDD
1234678 HpCDF
12347B9 HpCDF
TOTAL HpCDF
OCDD
OCDF
Z[>~AH
ASH
Zl> Ail- 002
ASH
ZI' AH-003
ASH
35
576
626
3259
ND
1910
151
171
2058
86
148
194
1281
654
660
479
124
3603
1555
2939
1842
119
2345
4519
893
ZP AH-004
ASH
ZD-AH-005
ASH
Dioxln Results are in pg/g
Note: Only 1 Ash Sample From This Facility Was Analyzed For Dioxins.
-------
(ZD) ASH
SAMPLE NUMBER:
DILUTION FACTOR:
INSCRIPTION:
UNITS:
2I> All 001
ASH
MG/KG
Zl> All 00?.
Af.ll
Mt;/K(!
ZD All-003
ASH
MO/KG
ZD AII-004
ASH
MC./KC
ZD All-005
ASH
MG/KG
*** INORGANICS ***
PP CAS NO COMPOUND
3
4
6
8
10
11
12
14
15
16
19
20
24
ARSENIC
BARIUM
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
COPPER
IRON
LEAD
MANGANESE
MERCURY
SELENIUM
SILVER
SODIUM
ZINC
30
411
51
B7
1060
34600
4090
574
0.91
2.9
7.5
6050
5660
54
440
66
199
960
37100
5040
609
1.6
9.4
6480
6560
43
545
6!)
70
1490
27400
2980
616
2.1
3.1
11
6500
8000
44
434
42
54
959
31100
2860
965
0.55
3.9
6.3
6100
4930
36
432
39
52
1800
22900
22400
636
0.97
3.2
76
5890
4260
-------
(ZD> ASH
SAMPLE NUMBER:
DILUTION FACTOR:
DESCRIPTION:
UNITS:
ZD-AH 001
ASH
IK;/KG
ZD-AH 002
ASH
MG/KG
ZD-AH-003
ASH
MG/KG
ZD-AH-004
ASH
MG/KG
ZD-AH-005
ASH
MG/KG
*** GBOCHEMICAL PARAMETERS ***
PP CAS NO COMPOUND
no
MOISTURE CONTENT X
TOC
TOTAL SOLUBLE SOLIDS
AMMONIA
NITRATE
ORTHO PHOSPHATE
TOTAL ALKALINITY
CHLORIDE
SULFATE
ALUMINUM OXIDE X
CALCIUM OXIDE X
MAGNESIUM OXIDE X
POTASSIUM MONOXIDE X
SILICON DIOXIDE X
10.69
0.4
25800
6850
1.00
1.59
<0.05
852
1270
2220
12
11
2.0
1.4
35
10.60
1.6
30000
13200
1.04
1.14
0.05
558
2190
5580
12
11
1.9
1.1
37
10.51
1.2
52100
6440
1.02
0.44
0.05
786
766
1680
13
10
2.2
0.79
35
10.36
1.2
11400
8740
0.90
0.96
0.05
852
654
2360
9.9
12
2.2
1.1
32
10.46
0.9
53200
7150
1.08
0.72
0.05
922
869
1800
11
11
1.8
0.98
36
-------
(ZE) ASH
KAMPU NUMBER:
DILUTION FACTOR:
DESCRIPTION:
UNITS:
ZE-AH-001 ZE-AH 002 ZE AH-003 ZE AH-004 ZE-AH-005
ASH ASH ASH ASH ASH
*** BASE/NEUTRALS ***
PP CAS NO COMPOUND
NO PARAMETERS DETECTED FOR THIS CATEGORY
-------
(ZE) ASH
SAMPLE NUMBER:
DILUTION FACTOR:
DESCRIPTION:
UNITS:
ZE-AH-001
ASH
ZE AH-002
AiiH
ZE-AH-003
ASH
ZE-AH-004
ASH
ZE AH-005
ASH
»*+ ACIDS ***
PP CAS NO COMPOUND
NO PARAMETERS DETECTED FOR THIS CATEGORY
-------
(ZE) ASH
SAMPLE NUMBER:
DILUTION FACTOR:
DESCRIPTION:
UNITS:
*** PESTICIDES ***
PP CAS NO COMPOUND
ZE-AH-001 ZE-AH-002 ZE-AH-003 ZE-AH-004 ZE-AH-005
ASH ASH ASH ASH ASH
DICHLOROBIPHENYL
NA
NA
98
NA
NA
-------
(ZE) ASH
SAMIi.t UunuER:
DILUTION FACTOR:
DESCRIPTION:
UNITS:
2378 TCDD
TOTAL TCDD
2378 TCDF
TOTAL TCDF
12378 PeCDD
TOTAL PeCDD
12378 PeCDF
23478 PeCDF
TOTAL PeCDF
123478 HxCDD
123678 HxCDD
123789 HxCDD
TOTAL HxCDD
123478 HxCDF
123678 HxCDF
123789 HxCDF
234678 HxCDF
TOTAL HxCDF
1234678 HpCDD
TOTAL HpCDD
1234678 HpCDF
1234789 HpCDF
TOTAL HpCDF
OCDD
OCDF
ZE-AH-001
ASH
ZE-AH-00L'
ASH
ZE-AH-003
ASH
10
130
176
1312
35
283
52
43
543
11
11
22
148
95
134
45
20
574
!'?'>
122
155
16
215
294
59
ZE-AH-004
ASH
ZE-AH-005
ASH
Dioxln Results are in pg/g
Note: Only 1 Ash Sample Fr«n This Facility Has Analyzed For Dioxins.
-------
(ZE) ASH
SAMPUJ NUMBER:
DILUTION FACTOR:
DESCRIPTION:
UNITS:
ZE AH (101
ASH
MG/KG
ZE AH 002
ASH
MG/KG
ZE-AH 003
ASH
MG/KG
Zfi Alt 004
ASH
MG/KG
ZE-AH 005
ASH
MG/KG
*** INORGANICS ***
PP CAS NO COMPOUND
3
4
6
0
10
11
12
H
15
10
19
20
24
ARSENIC
BARIUM
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
COPPER
IRON
LEAD
MANGANESE
MERCURY
SEIJJNIUM
SILVER
SODIUM
ZINC
16
407
34
665
990
34600
1550
593
76
44
6750
B2BO
17
491
35
71
1300
43000
1380
640
4.7
5.6
6410
3530
19
505
38
87
1820
45100
1170
531
13
5.4
7500
3600
15
391
37
67
1500
40200
1170
598
4.8
4.7
13
5880
3400
20
792
18
70
930
33900
1600
581
3.2
11
7700
2120
-------
(ZB) ASH
SAMPLE NUMBER:
DILUTION FACTOR:
DESCRIPTION:
UNITS:
ZE-AH-001
ASH
MG/KG
ZE AH-002
ASH
MG/KG
ZE-AH-003
ASH
MG/KG
ZE-AH-004
ASH
MG/KG
ZE-AH-005
ASH
MG/KG
*** GEOCHEM1CAL PARAMETERS ***
PP CAS MO COMPOUND
r
MOISTURE CONTEHT X
TOC
TOTAL SOLUBLE SOLIDS
AMMONIA
NITRATE
ORTHO PHOSPHATE
TOTAL ALKALINITY
CHLORIDE
SULFATB
ALUMINUM OXIDE %
CALCIUM OXIDE %
MAGNESIUM OXIDE X
POTASSIUM MONOXIDE X
SILICON DIOXIDE X
11.61
2.5
34000
22900
5.05
2.90
<0-05
3490
9220
2190
11
I!
2 0
1.2
31
11.69
1.9
8920
25900
3.64
3.19
<0.05
4710
10900
1500
9.7
14
1.6
1.2
31
11.71
1.4
4060
35500
8.69
4.51
<0.05
2990
14100
2790
10
13
1.9
1.4
35
11.40
1.3
7290
26100
7.32
4.10
<0.05
7310
10400
2530
10
14
1.8
0.95
30
11.82
0.6
43300
11200
2.77
4.23
<0.05
7590
7550
2270
10
13
1.6
1.0
32
-------
-------
APPENDIX C
LEACHATE RESULTS
(FACILITIES ZB, ZC( ZD, ZE)
R339911
-------
-------
(ZB) LEACHATE
SAMPLE NUMBER:
lilUrt'lON FACTOR:
I'KtXWHTION.
UNITS:
7.U LK 001
1.EACHATE
ZB I.E W>2
I.EACHATE
«*• ACIDS *»*
PP CAG NO COMPOUND
NO PARAMETERS DETECTED FOR THIS CATEGORY
O
IM
-------
LEACJIATK
SAMPLE NllhDER:
I'llAJTION FACTOR:
hKSCKIITION:
UNITS:
7.11 LK 001
I.KACMATK
KG/I.
ZH I.K 002
I.KACI1ATK
IKi/l.
O
CO
• «« 1NORUAN1CS ***
f'P CAR NO COMPOUND
1
4
6
7
10
11
13
14
17
20
VA
AUIHINUH
BARIUM
CAIW1IH
CAUJIUM
COPPER
IRON
MAUNES1UH
MANUANESB
POTASSIUM
SODIUM
ZINC
SILICON
9220
40
88
840
17300
17600
1620000
24SOOOO
8.3
31W)
19
04
112000
lf.700
6 7
10900
14000
7 !.
3!.UO
-------
(ZB) LEACHATE
SAMPLE NUMBER:
DILUTION FACTOR:
DESCRIPTION:
UNITS:
ZB LE 001
LEACHATE
MG/L
ZB LE-002
LEACHATE
MG/L
*** GBOCHEMICAL PARAMETERS ***
PP CAS NO COMPOUND
TOC 30.0
AMMONIA 4.18
NITRATE 0.45
ORTHO PHOSPHATE 0.01
TOTAL ALKALINITY 65.0
SULFATE 171
TDS 40600
FIELD PH 6.5
SPECIFIC CONDUCTIVITY UMHOS/CM >10000
TEMPERATURE (C) 9
10.6
<0.05
0.01
<0.01
154
197
535
6.5
880
5
-------
(ZC) LKACHATE
SAMPLE NUMBER:
DILUTION FACTOR:
DESCRIPTION:
UNITS:
ZC^LE-001
LEACHATE
ZC 14-002
LBACHATK
*** BASE/NEUTRALS ***
PP CAS NO COMPOUND
NO PARAHKTERS DETECTED FOR THIS CATEGORY
t/i
-------
(ZC) LEACHATE
SAMPLE NUMBER:
DILUTION FACTOR:
INSCRIPTION:
UNITS:
ZC LE 001
LKACHATE
7.C I.E 002
LEACHATK
*** ACIDS ***
PP CAS NO OOMPOUND
NO PARAMETERS DETECTED FOR THIS CATEGORY
O
Ot
-------
(ZC) LEACHATE
SAMPLE NUMBER:
DILUTION FACTOR:
DESCRIPTION:
UNITS:
»«* INORGANICS ***
I1» CAS NO COMPOUND
4
7
11
12
13
14
17
20
24
BARIUM
CALCIUM
IRON
LEAD
MAGNBSIUM
MANCANKSK
POTASSIUM
SODIUM
ZINC
SILICON
ZC IJs (K)l
I.EACIIATB
UG/l.
ZC I.E 002
I.KACI1ATE
IKJ/I.
7.8
64600
10H
22600
493
79700
188000
13
4570
00
65800
no
34
23000
501
81200
191000
9 0
4840
-------
(ZC) LBACHATB
SAMPLE NUMBER: • ZC LK 001 ZC LE 002
DILUTION FACTOR:
DESCRIPTION: LEACHATE LEACHATB
UNITS: MG/L MG/l.
*•** QEOCHKMICAL PARAMETERS ***
PP CAS NO COMPOUND
TOC 47.2 49.3
AMMONIA 68.2 77.4
NITRATE 0.40 0.41
ORTHO PHOSPHATE <0.01 <0.01
TOTAL ALKALINITY 560 566
SULFATE 14.6 14.4
TDS 924 932
FIELD PH 6.9
7> SPECIFIC CONDUCTIVITY W«OS/CM 1800
00 TEMPERATURE (O 21
-------
(ZD) LEACHATE
SAMPLE NUMBER:
UlumON FACTOR:
DESCRIPTION:
UNITS:
Zl> LE-001
LEACHATE
ZD LE 002
I.EACHATE
Zl>-LE 003
LEACHATE
**» BASE/NEUTRALS ***
PP CAS NO COMPOUND
NO PARAMETERS DETECTED FOR THIS CATEGORY
O
to
-------
-------
(ZD) LEACHATB
SAMPLE NUHBER:
DILUTION FACTOR:
(CSCRIFTION:
UNITS:
»»» INORGANICS ***
PP CAS NO OGHPOUND
4
7
10
11
13
14
17
20
24
BARIUM
CALCIUM
OOPPIR
IRON
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
POTASSIUM
SODIUM
ZINC
SILICON
ZD-LE 001
UiACllATE
UG/L
ZD
002
I-EAOIATE
UO/L
ZD LE 003
I.KAOIATE
IKJ/L
40
477000
12
187
345000
795
636000
2480000
8.7
15300
18
386000
46
523
367000
718
229000
1340000
8760
38
470000
7.3
211
340000
857
632000
2580000
5.2
14900
-------
TOG
AMMONIA
NITRATE
ORTHO PHOSPHATE
TOTAL ALKALINITY
BULPATE
TD6 ,
FIELD PH *"
SPECIFIC CONDUCTIVITY UMHOS/CM
TEMPERATURE 1C)
28.8
4.38
0.04
0.24
709
4920
12700
flU
> 10000
30
30.7
28 4
<0.01
0.17
744
4140
8030
9400
19
NA
NA
<0.01
0.22
711
5080
13000
>10000
30
-------
(7.t) It'U'llAI't.
SAMI'U NUMHtH:
HI I 111 ION KA( TDK:
|)|-S( KITTION:
I'M IS:
*** BASK/NEUTRALS ***
I')' CAS NO COMIHHJNI)
(.5 85-0 REN/OIC A( II)
/I--H--OIII
I
I I- ADI Al>
/(• -U -IIOZ
I
ItACIIATt
7:1
-------
(7.E> I.KA< HATK
SAHI'I K NIIMBKH.
IH I U ION t-ACTOK:
llhSI kll'1 ION:
UM IS:
/I- -I.I- -DO)
IK-
II Al HA II IIAIIIAU
IHi/l. III. /I
»«* ,\( I OS ***
IT CAS NO COHIHHINI)
NO I'AKAMKTERS IIKTK TED FOR THIS CATEGORY
-------
UK)
SAHI'I.K NUNIIKU:
HI Mil ION KAC'IOR:
lit Still IT I ON:
UN IIS:
«** INDUUANICS ***
I'l* CAS NO CONrOUNI)
r>
1
7
II
II
14
17
21)
24
BAR 1 UN
CALCIUM
IRON
MAGNES 1 UN
MANCANESE
POTASSIUM
SODIUM
ZINC
SILICON
7K IK (Mil
I.I-A( MAIh
IK,/I.
JOHO
5070(100
1050(1
I4HOO
17100
14110000
2430000
27
498
IV. U-UII2
I.KAI IIAI K
0(1/1.
5570000
74UO
15000
I llf.OO
1450000
2470000
70
470
-------
10000
23
25.5
11.4
0.01
-------
-------
APPENDIX D
ASH EXTRACT RESULTS
R339911
-------
SVMI'I t NUMBER:
IHII'l ION I-ACTOR:
liKSCRII'TION:
I NITS:
\sn
«*« HASE/NEUTRALS *«*
I'l1 (.'AS NO COMPOt ND
/\ All (WIHIH20 / .\-AII-OOI H'TOV /A-AII-OOISAR ZA-AII-OI) IT( l.f'l /A-AH-OOITCLI'2
\'.n (-\iimi \sii hxniM r \sn t \THACT ASH FMKACT ASH KXIHAIT
65-85-0
BENZOIC ACID
-------
CM
AJio:)3iv.) si in HOJ a:u.>3iju
ON
.1, i\ HIM ns\ .1 IVHLXH HSV .1, IVH.IVI ns\ nuim ns\
iin.nino-nv-v/ icn.iiioo-iiv-v/ HVSK)O-IIV-\/ \O.I,.HI(IO-IIV-\/
i.)\?u.\i ns\
-in \/
LI\HJ\.I nsv
(INfKMHO.) ON SV.) d,l
*** SOI.1V ***
: S11N I
: NO 11.11H )S 1(1
'HO.IJVJ NOI I I I HI
-------
i 't
•ji: i
on/
OOO07.'. I
'(,'1
OOOHOI
1 ''.I
IH'O
0(17^
in i
in
HHI
DIM 1 '
(ino'i,: i
'.'j
III (II
01 I'l
OOt 1 7.
01 1 1
it
1 •)!)
'.'.1
,' I.H
OOOOS 1
1 ''I
tWi'.z
i'i
mi
H''l
•ri
L':'J
(III, 117.
OOOHOl
in
ii'i7.r.
in
in
Ml
Kill
DM,"
>Nl /
UlUlu;,
IvillfHI IS
Ulll Ul Ih
1S" .1.1
*»* S )IKV:>)I()M »»•
tn
'\/'M
.I.IVHIXH III.V
I/'M
l\ MIV-I ll!;\
Mil 1,11 M IS HI
HOI l\ I -Jill I I III!
II.-IIIN'K II.MiV-:
-------
S\MI'lh \IMHI-K.
Ill I I I II i\ I-AI TDK:
HI Si kllTlOV
I M IS.
»*» (iHM'lltMH Al, I'ARAMFIHtS ***
IT I AS NO COMPOUND
/ \-ui-oiin iiv / \ MI ooii>ni2<> /\ ui-uiuirio\ /\ AH OOISAH /\ MI ourniri /\-\n-ooiii IP;
\sn i \IH\I i \sn i-Mini i \sn i-Mim i \sn IMUMI \(;n KMI.'-M I \sn mind
I c./l
IOC
AHMONI\
NITKVTK
OBTHO PIIOSPII \TE
TOTAI AlKAUMn
THLOKIOF
SUI.I-Alt
AlUHINI'M UMHE X
CALCIC* OX I UK %
MAGNESIUM OX I lit X
POTASSIUM MONOMDK
Sll ICON UIDMDF X
IMS
21.'^
O.'l 1
o. r,
«).()!
1210
77:1
H'lti
2',\
t'».iUO()
.1200(1
1 1 1000
G2 HH»
:i'J20
IT. 1
0.21
0. 12
(0.01
'HIH
'ITid
:. 1 1,
19r.
I.HIOOO
121
1 1 1000
7IT>
•1220
2 .".00
o.:u
0. 12
o.:n
1450
H01
I 1 20
IKIOO
:io toooo
r.H(.ioo
12HOOO
9H700
9720
I ', . 0
O.B!»
I. I I
'O.OI
H^jl.
H 10
507
I (if,
I 1 00000
18
1 2 1 000
875
2!) 70
21 10
O..I1
0. n
<0.02
21)'.)0
971
S52
:noo
bfi'1000
100
Hi -1000
5520
HH20
22:iO
0.20
0. 10
•. 0 . 02
21 iO
10 10
1110
1 12
29 10000
Cifi'lOO
1 1^000
(,.(20
10200
-------
UA002) ASH m'KACT
SAMI'l.t NIIMBKH:
1)1 I.I'11 ON FACTOR:
I)KS( HII'TION:
UNITS:
/A-AH-002102 /.A AII-M>2I>III20 / A-AII-IW2H'TOX /.A-AII-002SAK /A-AH-002TCI.IM /A-AH-002TCLI'2
ASM KX'IKAI T ASH KXIKAlT ASH MTKACT ASH KXTRACT ASH KXTHACT ASH KXTRACT
*** HASK/NKUTRAI.S ***
I'l1 CAS NO COMIIIUND
NO PARAMETKRS UKTKCTED FOR THIS CATEGORY
7
in
-------
-------
ir 'mi IIH ooHii: OIH
OOOHZ;: 00001,11 oiKiii'ii oooo'ji oooiti
'IT I) U'O y.H7.
H'i: W;L?. •( I Nil
:N(ll.l.ll)I.IMd
:il(l.l..)V.>{ NIIIIHIMI
7
-------
(7.A002) ASH mKA< T
S\MIM K NIINHKK:
Hill I ION KACTOH:
I*S( KII'TION:
liM IS:
*** 0
10900
-------
o\
AHu!H.iv:> KIIU H(H Vlim IISV
7.<\'\ in no iiv-v/ i.i i II.KMInv-v/ tnstiio HV-V/ \
-------
(MOO.)) ASH I-UMAI I
l>l I.I11 KIN KACl'OK:
III SI kll'l ION:
HM PS:
/ \-MI-Oini (1^ /AMI III) 11)11120 /A-AII OIIIH'IOX /.A-AII-OO.ISAU /A All-01) I'll I I'l /A- Ml -OO.TK l
ASH KXTUAI I ASM I-\II(A( I ASM I-VI MAI I ASH hXIHAI I ASH h'XIKAl I ASH hVIKACl
*«* AI'IIIS **»
IT CAS NO rOMHHINI)
NO I'AKANKTERS DKfKCTH) KOR THIS
-------
(/.Add I) ASH MIUAI I
SAMI'I.I- NIIMHHI:
1)11 I'l ION I>AC TDK:
HI-SI HI I'l ION:
UNI IS:
««* INOHCMNICS ***
I'l' CAS NO COMCOIINI)
AKSFNIC
HAH HIM
CADMIUM
CIIUOHHIM
COI'I'KR
IKON
I.I-AD
MANfiANKKK
MH(( IIKV
SODIUM
ZINC
H
II)
I I
I I
/A All (Hill HI! /A All OOIDIIIZII /A-AII IMCIII'lo.X /A All OO.ISAII /\ All OO.IMI.I'I /A- AII-OIKl'K 'l.l'2
ASH I \IKAI I
III. /I
2 III
HT.
.IIHI
ri'iooo
I.IIO
ASH l-.XIIIAt 1
IK, /I.
:u
:ioo
1000
72
1 MHO
12000
11.100
:t i 'to
III
1011000
7!i!IOO
ASH 1- \IHAl 1
IIC/I.
fp 1 H
I2H
I'l 10
0.20
1 11,000
12110
ASH 1 MIIACV ASH KXlKAtl
i»i/i. o<;/i.
S'.tr, mm
li!)!i
I.I
Mil :i.i
r, -11400
'.I'll. HI
:i')i;o
O.HH
ir>20ooo 12:11100
.l<7 70100
-------
(XAOO.'I) ASH
SAMI'I t MtMHKR:
Illl IM ION hA( TDK:
Dt-SCKirriON:
UNI IS:
*** (ihOCIIKMICAI. I'ARAMH KKS ***
I'l' CAS NO COMPOUND
/A-AII-U(ni()2 /A-AII 0011)11120 /A-AH-00'IKI'IOX /A-AII-00 ISAK /A -AH-003 I'd I'l 7 A - AII-(M):IT( l.l'2
\SII HXIKV I \SII Mll(\( I ASH hX'IKAl I ASH HXTKAC f ASH !• \1HAI I' ASH m'KAIT
KM;
AHMONI A
NI THAU
OHTIIO 1'IIOSIMIAIK
IOTAI. AI.KAI INITV
( III.OHIDh
SIII.FAIK
ALUMINUM OXIDK %
CALCIUM OXIDK I
MACNtSKIM OXIUK. X
mTASSIUM MONOXIDK X
SILICON 1)10X11)1- X
ros
23. 'J
o.:tr.
0. 1.1
o.uz
ir>(io
mid
1 050
300
fi!M()OI)
:tao(io
1 .IfiOOd
:t(,i,oii
IH!)0
i r, . :i
0.28
0.12
Ml.dl
1120
10HO
r( r( v
71
(>950()0
r,?
K.IOOO
HMO
K.20
2460
o.;is
0.11
().'J4
ir,r.o
890
1320
29:«)0
3050000
TifiOOO
1 1
-------
I7.AU04) ASH KXTKAC1
SAMI'I K NIJMHKH:
I)11III ION KACTOK:
Ill-Si Ul IT I ON:
I'M IS:
/ A-AII-OOll'Oi: /A-AII (10)1)11120 /A-AH-UlHKrrox /A-AII-UO ISAK /A-AII -(KM K I |'| /.A-AII -00-M'CI V'i
ASH HX'IHAI I ASH t-MHACI ASH hXIMACT ASH I-XTKA("I ASH I-XCKAIT ASH KX I I(A( T
*** HASK/NKHTKAI.S ***
I'l' CAS NO COMPOUND
NO I'ARAMKTERS DETKCTKD FOR THIS CATIvGORV
7
i-rf
U)
-------
(/.Add 1) ASH hVIKM C
SAMI'I.K NIIMHKR:
lillllTHIN KA< IOK.
DI-SCKII'TION:
I'MI'S:
/A-AII-UOKllL' /A All 01111)111^(1 /.A-AH OOIH'IOX /A-AH-004SAK 'I A-AII -OI).J'I I I I'l /A -AII-001 IVI.1'2
ASH KXIHAi I ASH I V I I(A( I ASH PXI'KACI' ASH HXTKACI' ASH (•X'lHACI ASH HXIHACT
»** ACIDS ***
I'l' CAS NO COMIIHINI)
NO I'AUAMKTKHS I)KTK( TKI) KOK THIS CATEGORY
-------
onnr ?.i oidi
oiiiii oooo'ii i omim
O'H
in:
o'i'iz •; ' 7.
I/I 110)17.
001 III' 7.\
!)•/. i'H Hi1;
07. H'H
HV
r,M ;:(,•; HIS
•|/:m 'i/rm 'i/'in
.1 WN.I.XH n:;v i ivniV'i ir.v .1 WHIVI n:.v
(MlHI'j I'J'I
(10011(11 OOO'jCI
vz
0101:
OdC'l OI7.X
(1011(11 17.
07.'I7. !.l.l'
Li. TH
?I.S
701: Hl'j
•|/')il 'l/'lil
1 )VMI \-l II'JV 1 )V)II V 1 M',V
000 It I
7117.
:>NI/
HI) UK IS
HfllN/mS
AMI. NIMH
:NVW
(IV'H'I
NOJII
JH.I.IIU
MIIIHOHIU
WlHHIIV )
Nil III VII
IINIHMHO )
«**
17.
m
HI
'Jl
II
7.1
II
01
H
•1
1
(IN SV.) .1.1
S.IINVVMONI »»«
\rt
Z.n. ».i KID- MV-V/ I.IMIIIIII ov
JIVMOII MV v/ \oi.i inm nv v/
:SI I Nil
• nn\ 1,1 in is-in
• noi iv-i soliivini
:/HIIHllN .H I.IMS
i..wjim usv (ioov/1
-------
(7AOU4) ASH I XTKAIT
SAMI'I (• NUMHKK:
llll.l'l ION FACTOU:
OKSl HI IT I ON:
I.NI IS:
/A-AII-OOIC02 /A -All -OOlDIIIIiO /A-.\ll OOIKI'IOX /A-AII001SAU /A All-ll() 11'( I I'l /A All-Oil I I'CI.1'2
ASH I-M'HA< I ASH I-\ I'KAI I ASH h\1KA< I ASH KXTKAI I ASH HIHA( I ASH KM'HACT
*** (iHlCHKMICAI. I'AKAMH't'KS ***
l'l> ( AS NO COMI'OIINI)
f(K'
AMMONIA
NITKAIK
ORTHO PHOSPHATE
TOTAL ALKALINITY
CHI.OKIOK
SULHATK
ALUMINUM OXIDK X
CAI.l HM OXIDK X
MAfiNKSIUM OX IDF X
POTASSIUM MONOXIDE X
SILICON D10XIHK X
TDS
:t-i . 9
0.44
(1. Ill
o . on
i (.DO
960
H.)^
I7'J
C9*)000
42HOO
i:i1000
f> 70(10
K',1,0
2G.2
0.27
o . i :t
'0.01
'110
H02
12'.)
1 It.
tiBioim
f)0
1 34001)
lll(il)
ZH'JO
2210
0.4Ti
0.20
o . r.i
12.r)0
71H
!)I7
HilOO
2T.OOOOO
50HOO
10100
75:100
H090
27.. 1
1 . 00
3.25
<0.0)
IDtiO
901
512
9-t
1 1 'JOOOO
18
1 IKOOO
H77
3270
2 1 00
O..I7
0. 1 1
c(). 02
25 '10
1020
IH'J
1 170
67 HUH)
219
157000
4710
9050
2200
0.22
0 . 1 C>
<().()!
3 '150
I,H(>
9HO
798
(i 12000
1 1500
(, 1.100
1 Kill
92.10
-------
(/A005) ASH
SAMI'I.K NDMBPH:
lill.llllON FAfTOH:
DKSCHII'TION:
UNITS:
/A-AH-o»r.n>2 /A Aii-t>or)i>iir
-------
(/.AUOi) ASH EXntAC'l
SAMI'I h NliMUKK:
III HI I HIM tA( TOK.
HKSI UII'I'ION:
UNI IS:
/A-AII-00'-)CO ICI.I'I /A-AH (H)!iK;i
ASH KXIHACI ASH HX'IIIAII ASH KXTKAI I VSII hXI'KACT ASH hXI'KACT ASH t- \ IHACT
**» ACIDS ***
I'l' CAS NO (OMPOIINI)
NO I'AHAMKTKKS DETECTED FOR THIS ( ATEGOHY
00
-------
oo'jHi mi
WOliZI 00(10', M
tZ '0
OZtvZ
1- LI \17.
OOHHZ 7.\
L7. !l(,l
<)l
'j'jl
Hilt 'JO'j
or,<.)
iioiio'; I
i ' i
HV.
01 il
0 1 '1
VH
\'.)
w.w,
\>>L
HI-
LL'.t
Hlii:
OiOl 0011'?
o(io/.i:i 0001:1.1
91
li 'H
07. OKI
Oilli:
'jll H-.ll
H.'VHJ.X-I iisv .i)v?nx< iisv i..)viiu.-i iisv I.IVHJXI nsv I.IVJMVI nsv
i.)i.«joo-iiv-v/ iii'iii'joo nv v/ MVS'JOO nv v/ \oi,i:^•( iNII
:NOI 1,11 H is HI i
: lid I IV I Nlil III III!
,)V>M.X'< IISV CjOOV/l
-------
(/A005) ASH l-\lliA< '
SAMI'I.I- NIIMW-R:
HI I.Ill ION KACIOH:
Ill-Si hi IT I ON:
I'NI rs.
*** (iKOOHI-MKAL I'AHAMHKKS ***
I'P CAS NO COMPOUND
ASH HI RAIT
/A-.\ll-UI)r,IHIIL'0 /A-AH-005KP'IOX /A-AII-005SAH /A AII-U05 ITI.I'I /A-AII-OOf> ICI.1'2
ASM l-UKAil' \SII MTKAII ASH KX THAI I ASH KX'IUAIT ASH t \ '\'UM I'
KK;
AMMONI A
NITRATK
OR1IIO PHOSPHATE
TOTAL ALKALINITY
nil ok i lit:
Sdl.KATK
ALUMINUM 0X11)1- X
CAI.I IliM OX I lib, X
MAUNKSIIIM OXIIIK X
POTASSIUM MONOXIDI- X
Sll II (IN IIIIIXIIII- X
IDS
64.2
0.21
0. 30
0.09
1590
1030
6!) 7000
i r.Hiim
f/iioo
17 10
0.20
1440
U6H
HI
(i'JHOOO
14HOOO
G'J4
IHlid
2520
0.40
0.21
0.47
2090
1160
1 1 30
12600
3580000
5HHOO
154000
9H700
1 1 100
42.5
1 .03
3.21
'.l
10HO
IHO
3540000
55400
12HOOO
HI 100
11 100
-------
(ZB001) ASM EXTRACT
SAMI'I.K NUMBER:
III I HI ION FACTOR:
OfSI RIPTION:
UNITS:
/D-AH-OOIC02 /H-AII-001I)III20 ZB-AH-OOIKPTOX 7.B-AH-001SAK /B-AH-001TCI.P1 ZB-AH-001TCLP2
ASH KXTKAC'I' ASH KXTKACT ASH EXTRACT ASH EXTRACT ASH EXTRACT ASH EXTRACT
*** BASE/NEUTRALS ***
I>P CAS NO COMPOUND
NO PARAMETERS DETECTED FOR THIS CATEGORY
PO
-------
(7 BOO I ) ASH KXTKA< T
SAMI'I.K NDMBKR:
(111.1 IT I ON FACTOR:
1)1-S( HI IT I ON:
UNITS.
/B-AH-OOK02 /.It-All (1011)11120 7.11-AII-OOIH'l'OX /.U-AII-001SAK ZII-AH-001 ICI.I'I X.B-AII-OOITCI.1'2
ASH FXI'RACT ASH I-XIHAIT ASH KXTKACT ASH KXTHACT ASM I-XTHACT ASH KX TRACT
*** ACIDS ***
I'l1 CAS NO COHPOIINI)
NO PARAMETERS HF.TECTKI) FOR THIS CATEGORY
-------
rn
CM
(II CJ
OOO'J 1 1
iC'O
O'JOZ
o'jn:
fj
HI 1
J,.)VH.LX:i IISV
(it:
0000 It 1
1J7. '()
H''j
HI
W,l
'I/IIII
j. wim iisv
I'j (IC'Ifi
DOOHI i OOOHZI ooot:
»:/.'«
OCil
01
i'j I:OH
101.
,i.iv)i,ix-i HSV ^IIVIIIXH nsv .I.IVMUI
HI
11
0001 I I
1 1
in:
ft,
'IZ\
i ivji i x ^ n<;v
z,ri.).i.ion-iiv-u/ iii'Diioo HV «/ JIVKKHI nv u/ VCILUKKI uv ti/ (ir.iiidion uv si/ .'.nmio n\-ti/
.mr/
HI) KIDS
AHIUH3H
NDHI
HIIINdV.I
NI1IHVII
(\7.
I I
II
01
•J
I
(INIKMHO.I ON SV.) ,1,1
*»* SHNVDHONI *t*
:SIINK
:HOI >v i NDI mi MI
.DVHIX'I IISV ( 1111)117)
-------
(/!)()() I ) ASH K UK AIT
SAMPI K NIIMHKK:
IMI I I ION I-ACTOK:
DESCRIPTION:
UNI'IS:
*** CEOCHEMICAL PARAMETERS ***
I'l' CAS NO COMIIMIND
/H-AII-OOK 02 /II-AII-OUIIIIH20 /II-AII-OOIM'mi /H-AII-001SAK /H-MI-00 ITCI.IM XII-AII-OOI ITI.P2
ASH HXTRACT ASH h \ THAI I ASH EXTRACT ASH EXTKACI ASH H'lKAIT ASH KXTKACT
TIM:
AMMDNIA
NITKATE
OKTIIO PHOSPHATE
TOTAL ALKALINITY
CHLORIDE
SHI.FATE
ALUMINUM OX I DC X
*p CALCIUM OXIDE X
PO MAGNESIUM OXIDE X
* POT ASS ItiM MONOXIDE X
SILICON DIOXIDE X
TDS
NA
NA
O.K.
0.01
NA
1300
513
4'J'JO
909000
24600
99200
I2HO
NA
h.52
0.18
0.24
Ul.OI
:i:n
12011
3.6
4H50
HI 0000
24
108000
1 170
21 HO
NA
NA
0.13
1 . 32
NA
2160
556
3240000
127000
10 1000
32900
NA
1 1 . 5
NA
NA
<0.01
NA
NA
NA
30400
HI 700(1
36
11 1000
1420
NA
NA
NA
0.31
0.01
NA
1490
363
62800
1970000
920
122000
473
NA
NA
NA
0.30
1.75
NA
1270
72H
3210000
1 17000
100000
42600
NA
-------
(7.11002) ASM hXTHAI 1
S.\MI'I> NI1MIIKK:
lilllil ION l-Al 10U:
l)hS< KII'TION:
I'M IS
/ II-All -Ull'!( (12 /I<-AII-U02I)IIIJM> /It-\H-IM)VH'IO\ /M-AII-D02SAH /II-AII 00211 I I'l /!H-AH-(I021( U'2
ASH (-VI'KAll ASM h\ll(A(l' ASM KXIKACI ASM I-VI HAM' ASM KI'KAM' ASM KXIKAIf
*** KASk/NKIITRAI.S *** .
I')' CAS NO ( OMHII'NI)
NO I'AKAMKTKKS nKFKCTF.f) KOR THIS CATKGOBS
-------
(/IUMI2) ASH KXTKA( I
SAMI'l.t NUNHK.R:
III I III ION KACTOK.
DhSCHI I'TION:
I'M IS:
/I'.-AII-OOVl old /I1. All O
\SII h\ll(A( I \:,|| h\|l(.\(
*** A( IDS ***
I'l' CAS NO COMHXIND
/ll - Ul-Oir'H'l'OV /It-All (I02SAK /ll-AH-1102 I't I I'l / II All-Oil^ l'( I. Vi
ASH hMKAl I' ASH HMKAM ASH I-XIKAI I ASH
NO I'ARAMKTEKS UKTKCTEI) KOR THIS ('ATKU)K^
-------
00001 1 1
ooo ill nooo'ji i
7.'l
(K7.Z tT'J
01) SI
7.'.»z 'ir
I:I:H
II'J H.'l
(17. on:i it NVH
NOHI
in, 1,10.)
HI) (NOV.)
K.IIIIVII
17.
07
•Jl
1 1
II
(II
!)
1
'I/IIII
J.)VHIV4 IISV
7.ii'i ).
nv
IV i
in n/ ms7im nv
i IVHI \ 4 ir;v
\ni,ii,:oo nv-ti/ ii,:ni(i7.oo nv u/ rn)7oo nv-ii/
(INIKMNO.) ON KV.I ,1,1
*** S IINV'KIONI »«»
:SIINK
: NO| I,I I/I is III
:HOI IV-I Mill h
:)HIIHIIN -I I,l
I IV1IIX.1
(7.IMUI/I
-------
(/H002) ,\sii i-Mini i
S\MI'I K NIIMItl-U:
ID I I 11 ON I Al TOli:
HI-Si 1(1 I'TION:
I'M IS:
*** (iKM'IIKMICAl I'AHAMH'I-KS ***
I'l' (AS NO COMIMUNI)
IX)(
AMMONI A
NITKATK
OKTIIO I'HOSI'HATR
101 Al, AI.KAI INI TV
I HI OKI DK
SIII.KA1K
AI.HMINIIN OMDK X
CALCIUM UMliK t.
MA<;NFSMiM OMDK X
IXITASSIIIM MONOXIDF:
SII.KON DIDXIDh X
IDS
/H-AII -IMVi (\l /|1 -All l>D2l)IH2<> /ll \ll-OI)2H'l'll\ /It- All -Dili's U< / I'. - All-OUo K I I11 / H-AII- 002TI 1
\sn mini i \sn i \nni i ASH hMini i \sn mini i ASH m'lnri ASH KXTUAIT
NA
NA
o.:i.t
ri(ioo
fl'.)')
\A
:>.'.) 2
0.2H
I). 17
<0.ll|
2H.S
1H.IOO
17 10000
(iH
IH'HIOO
I.I 1
I III)
MA
NA
O.'il
I). 11)
NA
:n 10
\>22
IH 10000
1 UHKIO
IH'JIHH)
2 \ r.oo
NA
7..r),|
NA
NA
vll.OI
NA
NA
NA
iimmo
ic>!«moo
(.:>
Id 701)1)
r. ii
NA
\A
NA
1). Hi
<().()!
NA
•|f»00
'.2-1
r,2 .!()()
Z 7 0001)0
HK7
1 ,011(10
:)/')
NA
NA
NA
0.15
0.1)1
NA
2TM
1,71
.11)10000
12100
127000
7 '.)()()()
NA
-------
(/.IIOO.'I) ASH K\IKA< I
SAMI'I K NIIMIIKK:
1)1 Ml ION I-AI 'I OH:
1)1-S< Kin ION:
1>N I'IS:
*** H\SK/NKIJTHAI S ***
IT I AS NO ( (IMPOUND
/n -MI - ii(i:t( <>:; /i!--\n uo.iiiiii^i /H-AII IKUH'IDX /M .MI-OICISAK /H-MI noiniri /n -AH-IIOTK
ASM I-XIKVI ASH I-\IKAi I ASM I-\IHAt I ASM I- X'lKAl I ASM (-MltAC'l ASH KM'KAI I1
NO I'AKAMKTFHS !)!• TKCTKI) KOH THIS
-------
I/BOO'U ASM h\THA< I
S\MI'U NUMIIKIt:
HII I11 ION Ml \'(»t:
IIHSI HII'I'ION:
I M 1S:
/|l-AII-IW,l< (>;: /ll All (XMIlllIlM) /H-AII-OIUI I'lMX /ll-AII-l)(MS\l< /ll \H-OII lit I I'l /H-All-1)1) IICI.1'2
ASH KXTIiAll ASH I'\|KA( I \SII I-MUM'T ASM hXIKAII ASH I M I(A( T ASH KX1KACT
*** Al IDS ***
I'l' CAS NO COMIKXINI)
NO I'AKAMKTCKS DKTKCTKI) KOK THIS (ATKGORY
7
8
-------
S\MI'II' NIIMMHO
lill.lil KIN I A( I OK:
/It All (III II (17 /h All IIOIHIiru /It All (IIMI I'llA /H All III) I.'.AK /It All (III IK I I'l / II All 00.11(1.17
IH-S< Kll'l |i)N:
I'M IS:
**» INOI((;ANICS
I'l' CAS Nil
1
1,
1(1
\'i
II
lri
2(1
21
***
COMmilNI)
HAimiN
CAIIMIUM
(UI'I'HH
I.KAII
MANCANKSK
MUtCllin
SOIllliM
ZINC
AMI 1 \IKAl 1 AMI IVIKAt 1 AMI I\II(A( 1
li(. /I. (i|. /I IKI/I,
tin r. i en
2'.<
H . K 21 T. 1
17
2 Ml
:i . ri
1.12000 izumo ic, 1000
I'l II) (>7
ASH I-\II(A( 1
IIC/I.
1 .('.III
.tit
22
1 17000
2 'I
AMI IX IKAl 1 ASM HXIHACT
IIC/I. III. /I.
r
1:12
II 10
1710
0.7.1
1110000 Ml 1100
'.1.7 IfiHd
-------
(ZIHHH) ASH IX1KACI
SAMI'll- NIIMIIKH:
HIIHI ION I-ACTOK:
HI-SI HI 11 ION:
MM IS:
/IS All-Oil t( O'J /ll All 0(111)11120 /H-AII-00 IH'IOV /I1-AII-00:)SAU /!>-UI-OO.TH I I'l /.H-AII-Otl.fl< 1,17
\SII KXIKAl I ASH I-AIHAI I ASH KXIIMCT ASH hMI(A(T ASH KXIHAIT ASH KXIKAIT
*»» (iKOCIIKMICAI. I'AHAMKTKHS ***
I'l' CAS NO COMI'OIINI)
T(X:
AMMONI A
NITHATK
ORTIIO I'HOSPIIATK
TOTAL ALKALINITY
CIII.OklDK
SULFATE
ALUMINUM OX1DK Z
CALCIUM OX I UK X
HAGNkSIUM OXIDK X
POTASSIUM MONOXI UK
SILICON UIOXIDK X
1US
NA
NA
0.21
<0.01
NA
1.110
fiC>2
26700
101,0000
1090
124000
9!>H
NA
r>.r>2
0.10
0.12
<0.01
•I :io
1070
ll'J
21:1
HI 1000
H7
10HOOO
2:100
2190
NA
NA
0.17
0.06
NA
IOZO
9f>0
100
3720000
1 1 9000
1:14000
5090
NA
7.07
NA
NA
<0.01
NA
NA
NA
59f>0
ti'J'.IOOO
55
115000
23110
NA
NA
NA
0. 1.1
0000
G'J2
140000
3f.60
NA
NA
NA
0.07
0.0. i
NA
1290
111!)
:t(, 10000
1117000
127000
2f>HOO
NA
-------
b'liu, mi (i.u:).u:in
ON
JJVH.m IIS'V .1 IVHIXH HSV .I..H' >l ,I,V -I IIKV DVHIXH MSV I )V)I,IA 1 IISV
'i )iio()-iiv-ii/ hi i >,i i DO- MV ~n / m'sioo -nv-ti/ VO,I,,HIIIO nv H/ O^IIIIIMKI-IIV H/
J )VM m USA'
ON'H)rlW(» ON SV.)
-------
(711004) ASH EXTRACT
F NUMBER:
Htlll KIN KACTOK:
HhS( Id I'TION:
liM IS:
/It-All OOlniZ /.ll-AII OOIDIIII'O /.H-AII-OO-IEI'I'OX / B-AII-00 ISAK /.ll- AII-00 I'll I I'l /.H-AII-004 I'U.1'2
ASH KMKAC1 ASH I-\II(A(I ASM tXTKAII ASH KX TRACT ASH I-XIRAI'T ASH hX TRACT
*** ACIDS ***
I'l' CAS NO
NO PAHAMKTERS DETECTKI) FOR THIS f ATKUORY
-------
(/BOOK ASH KXIIIAI I
SAMI'I.K NIIMIIH1:
llll.lll ION I A< TOIC
DIM HI I'll ON:
UNI IS:
*«* INOI((;ANK s ***
IT CAS NO
.1
I
r,
10
12
11
If.
20
21
AKSKNIC
IIAHIUM
CADMIUM
COPI'KH
I.KAI)
MANIJANKSK
SODIUM
7. 1 NC
/H AII oo K o;
AMI I XIIIAI I
I Id /I.
127000
21
/n AII 0011111120 /.ii-Aii lion rio\ /n AII (ioi:,Aii n\ MI OOIKI.PI /n AII-OOIITI.I'Z
IK, /I,
1020
21
lf> 7000
ilAl'V ASH 1- XIIIAI 1
2.12
r,1.)
:i:i
SIH
i . '.)
1 I'lOOl)
422
ASH 1- XIIIAI t ASH IXIKAt 1' ASH EXTRACT
|i(;/l. IIC/I. IK./L
rilll) IHTiO 101
•>.\ ITi 21
22-1
I'l
1.7
ITilOOO IlilOOOO 156000
KiH I'l 2(!
-------
(7IU10I) ASM KXI'KACT
SAMI'I h NIIMIiKIt:
Illl II ION KAI TOK:
Ill-Si HI I'l ION:
I'M I'S:
**» (ihOniEMICAI. f'AKAMKTKKS ***
I'l1 CAS NO COMPOUND
/|l AH-OOII02 /ll-AII DO 11)11120 /H-AII-004mo\ /It-All 00 ISAH /H- All-Oil I Ml I'l /II-AII-(10 IT( l.l'i!
ASH KXIKAIT ASH I-XI'KACI ASH HXIHAIT ASH KVI'HACT ASH fXI'KAir ASH I-\ I KACT
T(M
AMMONIA
NITHATK
ORTIK) PHOSPHATE
IOTA I, ALKALINITY
(III.OKIDE
SlILI-ATK.
ALUMINUM OX IDF X
CALCIUM OX I UK X
MACNKSIIIM OX I OF. X
POTASSIUM MONOXIDK.
SILICON DIOXIDK X
IDS
NA
NA
0.14
<0.01
NA
IOHO
22.9
90700
7:i7000
207
124000
4IH
NA
.'(..) 7
0. 1 1
0.11
<0.01
972
1:120
<.o.r>
1(17
1250000
•i\
i:)40oo
r,9i
:i2?o
NA
NA
0. IS
0 . OG
NA
12 HO
HHI
:<6:)oooo
TfilOO
129000
10100
NA
.r>.73
NA
NA
U1.01
NA
NA
NA
501
1 1 (.1)1100
IB
If) 2 000
714
NA
NA
NA
o. ir>
<(I.OI
NA
If.. '10
10. 4
1410
1H 10000
.r>r>
ic:u>oi)
20.r>0
NA
NA
NA
0.14
O.():i
NA
1 MX)
720
7700
32(iOOOO
:tor,oo
1 WOOD
820
NA
-------
SIHJ. ww (i:u.
SHaiMNVHVd ON
.l:)VHlx^ MSV .DVM.LXH HSV .1 IVH.I\^ HSV i.ivn.m n;;v ,I.»VHI\I nsv
?.<\'\ ).l
-------
(znoor.) ASH KXIHACT
SAMI'I K NI'MHKK:
1)11.1 I ION I'ACTOU:
|l|-S( IH I'l ION:
I'M IS:
/H-AII-OO..C02 /ll-AII 0051)111^0 /It-All 0()f>H'H)X ^B-AII-OO.ri.SAU /U-AII-(IOf,TCI I'l /B-AII-l)05TCI.I'2
ASH mi
-------
111!
ooocHi
!)•(.
H.'l
'.17,
(jl
HHI:
it: in?.
(umuui (mimui
',7. '()
\:c,7.
in 'ii:
(ll.'jl O'JI 1
i'Jfr
oimsiu
II ' li
'Hit:
'17.
d'j
H-7.
f'JX.
(UKK.H
ll.i
17.
01:01
•I'M
o(uiiu:i
1 1
017,
.INI/
Hiimos
UIIDHHH
:HS1NV!)NVH
tiv:ii
JH.I.IO.)
Hill MOV.)
HlllHVtl
17.
OZ
'Jl
1 1
7.1
III
•I
''
(INIIO.IHO.) ON SV.I .1.1
**» SMINVDMONI »M
8
•|/'H|
I.IVHI\ i nsv
'I/DM
.1 IVHIV.-I nsv
J.IVHIXH IISV
i.i.i.'jdii n\ H/ i.ri.ii'jiin nv ti/ »ivsriio n\
i IVHIV-I nsv ,i ivd.ivi nsv i iv>im ir.v
XOI.IIMMI nv u/ n;:nIII':(M) nv u/ .:<>>',mi nv »/
•'NIM I.I Dl IS HI
:>IOMVI NO) III I HI
I.IVMIXH nsv CJOIIH/)
-------
(7.11005) ASH KXIHAIT
SAMI'I !• NIIMHI'R:
lill III ION fACTOR:
lihSI UIPIION:
HM IS:
«** (iKJCHKMICAl, I'ARAMKTKKS ***
I'l' CAS NO ( (IMCOIINI)
/i»-Aii-oo5Tci.i'2
ASH KXTRAI I ASM I-\IRA('I ASH !• XI KAI T ASH KXTHACI ASH !• X I KACT ASH KM'HACT
T(K'
AMMONI A
NITRATE
ORTIIO PHOSPHATE
TOTAL ALKALINITY
CHLORIDE
SUI.FATK
ALUMINUM OXIDE X
CALCIUM OXIDE X
HA(iNKSIIIH OVIDK X
POTASSIUM M(INO\IDI>
Sll II ON III (IX I HI- X
IDS
NA
NA
0.17
< 0 . 0 1
NA
1570
129
47700
H 7. 1000
247
I2HOOO
527
NA
•I.2H
0.10
0. 15
V 0 . (I I
•J96
2170
U.O
ifii
i :iooooo
21
I r,(,ooo
lot,
17 Til)
NA
NA
0.20
o.or,
NA
1740
H04
4000000
70400
1 70000
7570
NA
4.52
NA
NA
<0.01
NA
NA
NA
102
15:10000
17
18 1000
c:n
NA
NA
NA
0.15
<0.01
NA
2030
1.4
1 7C.OO
i ytioooo
70
20:1000
l.illll
NA
NA
NA
0 . 1 9
0.02
NA
20HO
7.i:t
17(10
:tt,4ouoi
(,HOOO
1(17000
14(10
NA
-------
(ZC001) ASM EXTRACT
SAMPLE NUMBER:
DILUTION FACTOR:
DESCRIPTION:
UNITS:
ZC-AII-UOKo;! /.(•-AII-OlMDIHiJO /C-AH-001 El'TOX /C-AH-001SAR ZC-AM-001TCI.I'l ZC-AH-OOITCU'2
ASH EXTRACT ASH EXTRACT ASH EXTRACT ASH EXTRACT ASH EXTRACT ASH EXTRACT
*** RASE/NEUTRALS ***
I'P CAS NO COMPOUND
NO PARAMETERS DETECTED KOR THIS CATEGORY
-------
UrOOl ) ASH KXTKA( T
SAMIM.K NIIMHKH:
I) 11,(I I I ON KACTOK:
IIKSI'KI I'l ION:
IIM IS:
/( -AH-OOK 02 /( -AII-()01I)IHVO /( -AII-00 I H'TOX /C-AII OOISAK /('-AH-OOI I'd I'l /C-AII-OOITCI l'2
ASH K.xrmcr ASH HXTHAI r ASH JXTHACT ASH KXTHACT ASH KXIKA
-------
(/.COO) ) ASH KMKACI
SAMIM.K NIIMMKIC
Illl III ION MCIOH:
III S( Ull'l ION:
UNI IS:
AII on n n;: /i Aii-oiiii>iii2o /r AM ooiH'im n -AII OIIISAK /r Mi-niniri.i'i /.i Aii-oonn.i'2
ASM I
IK,/I
ASM I \II(A( I
Illi/l.
ASM I XIKAl I
IN,/I,
ASM MIKA1T
(H./l,
*«* INOWJANICS *«*
I'l' CAS NO rOMWtlNI)
,
1
(,
H
10
1 1
12
II
If.
20
21
AKSKNIC
IIAItlllM
CADMIUM
(IIUOMIUM
(OI'I'KU
IKON
I.KAI)
HANliANKSK
MKIK DKY
SODIUM
/INI
/1
(•.H
HI
H. 7
'.If.
14 20
I 12
I I
7.0
IK'IOOd
I IH
7SIO
r> 170
O.(i7
1SHOIII)
Hi) urn
1 III
0.27
Clf.OOO
:m
I'.110
2(iOO
l.ri(iOO(IO
:t:i7t)o
10
•JHO
221
I 200
2:ifll)0
10100
7:170
0. II
IKHOOO
fl 1200
-------
(/( ooi) ASH HIKAI r
SAMI'I K NI1MI1HI:
III I.III ION KACTOK:
Ill-Si Illl'l ION:
UNITS:
*** (JEOCIIKMIC.AI. I'AHAMHKKS ***
l'l> CAS NO COMPOUND
/f-AII -Ollli 02 /( All 0011)11120 /r-AII-OOIH'I'oX /C-AH-OOISAK /( - AII-OOITl I I'l 7( - All -001 I ( l.l>;
ASM I-\ I'll AM1 ASH Ml HAM ASH h \ I HA( 1 ASH KXTHACI' ASH I-\TI{ U I ASH hXIKACI'
TOC
AMMONI A
NITHATE
ORTHO PHOSPHATE
TOTAL ALKALINITY
CHI.OKIOE
SOLFATK
ALUMINUM OX1DK X
CAI.( IUM OXIDE I
MAGNESIUM OX I UK X
POTASS IOM MONOX1 OK
SILICON DIOXIDE X
IDS
NA
0. 14
0. 19
0.01
NA
l>58
77
23200
108000
20000
NA
7.22
0. If,
0.94
0.01
228
2.'IO
1 IK
117800
1 92000
97
1 50000
1520
1 .120
NA
0.30
0.71
0.20
N-\
22(i
879
34400
1550000
63000
IIROOO
79000
NA
5.51
2.80
NA
0.01
NA
NA
NA
1 1 8000
18.1000
49
109000
905
NA
NA
0.19
0.25
0.01
NA
232
893
1270000
375000
120000
22400
NA
NA
0.32
15.3
1 .07
NA
249
985
1 1 0000
1750000
H0900
1 20000
43000
NA
-------
(/( (1(12 } ASM l-XIKAl I
'.\Mm NUMUKK:
l'lll;l ION I-At "It IK.
HKS< KIITION:
I M I'S:
/( -All IIIT'i ov /( ,\ll 0()2l)llli:() /(-All (II)2H'I()\ /.t:-AII-0()2SAH /C-AII-OOi: I Cl.l'l /i -AH-(K)L''I( 1.17
ASH h.\ll(\( I ASH h\lin( I ASH KXTKAI I ASH hX'IKAl'l ASH 1-\IHACT ASH hXIKACT
*** UASK/NKIITKAI.S ***
IT CAS NO COMIfMINI)
NO PAHAMKTKRS DKTM'TKD FOR THIS ( AT^:(;()H^
-------
17.1002) ASH KX1IIM f
S \MI'lh NIJMHKH:
UN I'l ION KA( TDK:
I)KS< lil I'l ION:
I
-------
IMWtU
011(11 II
OOi'j
1)0' 1 1
(Hill 1
O'Jl
I.-IZ
01. 1 1
711
OOCI Z
(1(1(101 -jl
7.1" 0
0071
in:
ii
!) ' !)
'II'J
ifil
'.Ml
00(1(1 7.1
I7'0
HI:
!ii:
y/
!)!.!
(MUZ'.I
0001' H
(ll-'iH
01)101
(HIM
(HOI
7.1
(17.1 1
;HI
Oi7.
(ion in
I7,'()
07.
•II
71
7.1,1
OM:I
OOOO'j 1
71(1
II
I'l
H'll
01
71)1
n
•(/•in
u:,v
'i/'ni
.1 IVMI V I II!,V
oz
•(/'III
uviim usv
l/flll
I.IVHIXI II'.V
'l/'lll
i IVMIv-i ir;v
.tN 1 /
HIIKIOS
UIH.IIHH
:iSHNVr>NVH
ll\HI
NOfl 1
H4.I.KI )
HIIIHomi.)
Hill NOV.)
Hi III! VII
JIN.4SHV
17.
or.
•Jl
1 1
7.1
II
01
H
'.)
1
t
i ii.zoo-iiv-.i/ i, n 117(10 nv M. nvs.:o() nv - i/ XOI.MZIIO nv »/
(INIIO.IHO.) ON SV.) ,1.1
*«* S HNV!)noNI nt
:SIINK
NO I 1,1111 )S1tl
'•Mill. IV-I NIDI III Mil
HV .»/ 70 I^I
I )VMI\H IISV (7.00 I/I
-------
(X.roo2) ASM Hi THAI r
SAMI'lh NliMIIKIC
IIIII'IION l-WTOK:
111-Si 1(1 I'l'ION:
ONI IS.
/c-Aii-oo;:i o.: /c AH 002011120 /< -AII -oi>2H'iox /C-AII-OOZSAK /<-Aii-oo2rin.ri /C-AH-UO^ICI 17
\SII I-X1HV I' A'ill I-MKAI I ASH tX'I'KAl'l ASH I-XIKAIT ASH K\II(A( I ASH KVI'KACI
*«* I.KOrllKMH Al I'AKAMI'UKS ***
l'l> CAS NO COMIKMINI)
UK'
\MM(IN\A
NITKATK
OKTIll) 1'IIOSniAIK
TOTAL AI.KAI.INin
(HI OKI OK
Slll.hATk
ALUMINUM OX 11)1- \
( Al.( II M OVIDK %
MACNKSHIH OXIDK X
HHASSIUM HONOXIDh
SILICON I) I OX I OK X
n>s
NA
0. 12
0.20
0.01
NA
70')
70
7:17000
2(iHOO
121000
2.SI 00
NA
i. r. i
0.14
0.40
!)8
nn
IH7
20:1000
I 4 1000
111000
T>!iH
ll'KI
NA
0.25
o.-ir>
0.22
NA
202
727
:nr.oo
1 600000
61HOO
1 1 1000
75700
Ni\
3.H7
3.02
NA
0.01
NA
NA
NA
I or.ooo
142000
04
i o'.tmm
722
NA
NA
O.K.
0.74
0.01
NA
2.r.fi
7dl
1 1 90000
UClOO ,
12:1000
2i:iOO
NA
NA
0. 18
0.2'1
2.04
NA
2 Mi
H'.):t
1 IKOOO
1X20000
H lt)00
1110000
HOOO
NA
-------
S\MPU NIIMBIH:
hill11 ION KA( TOR.
III-SI 1(1 I'TIUN.
I'M IS:
/( -All IK) II 01' /! All (XHIMIiyn /< -AH-OU'IKI'I'OX /r-AU-(IO ISAU /(-All UIUKII'I /(' AII-DOUI ( l,|>2
ASH KXIKACI ASH |-\II(A( I' ASH (-XIUACI ASH KXTRAI I \.SII hKlKACT ASH h X I I(A( T
*** H\S(-/NHITKAI.S ***
IT CAS NO rOMIHHINU
NO PARAMKTEHS I)KTE( TED KOB THIS CATECiORt
7
S
-------
S
18003J.V.) SI 111 JKM (I3.U:UH(1 SH3A:iHVHVd ON
DVMIX'H HSV DWUXH IISV 1.IVH1X.H IISV .1 IVHXX.H MSV
z.n.)ii:o()-iiv- >/ un.)j.»:oi»-nv- >/ Nvst.oo-nv- >/ xni.,i:it:(io-nv- )/
I IVH I V 1 II>,V
n nv- )/
1 IVJIIXH IISV
^i >f(io-nv- i/
(INIIO.IWO.) ON sva .id
*** sen >v «**
'•SI I N.I
:HOJ iv•! NOI 111 mi
I )VHI\.1 IISV (COO )/)
-------
ooi u;
ooooii
Zt."0
01 iii-
or. i a
ooi: i z
OOZI
(iti.i:
Mi
I'ji
I:MJ
OZOI
\:'j?.
'jL
00(11 Zl
1 '1
1 ''.I
107.
\.7.
\ i:
1, • 'j
i: • (j
i:c.»i
OOil.'J
OOHfaZI
OI'HI.
Ollli'J
(HIM I
Zl
nun
IIHl
•j-j
(HKI'J'Jl
I I
il.
1,1 I
HI
(Mill
(Mill 11 I
IIHl I
Ml
'.II I
O'i
SH
U
HIIMIOS
ANII.»i;4H
JISJINVIINVH
(iv:ii
NOMI
H:fi/ flVSI.(M) IIV I/ VOI.HIOO IIV-)/ (l^lll(li:00 IIV )/ TO l| ill) IIV )/
:NIII 1.1 IM ts HI
i)l IV I NOI I ill III
IMIIHIIN ri.lNVS
i.:iv)ii.v i nsv (i.oii i
-------
(zcoo:t) ASH EXTRACT
S\MI'U NUMHER:
1)1 U'l ION FACTOR:
I»S< KII'TION:
UMTS:
*** (JIOCIIKMICAL PARAMETERS ***
I'P CAS NO COMPOUND
/.< -AH-00:iC02 /C-AII-OIMmil20 /.l -All 0(1 IKI'TOX X.C-AH-OO.'ISAR /('-AH-OOMTCI.I'I 7C-AII-00:iT< I.P2
ASH EXTRACT ASH l-KTHAc I ASH KXTKACI ASH EXTRACT ASH KXTIJAl I' ASH KXTHAC.T
TOO
AMMONIA
NITRATE
ORTIK) PHOSPHATE
TOTAL ALKALINITY
CHLORIDE
SIII.FATK
ALUMINUM 0X1 OK X
CALCIUM 0X1 OK X
MAGNESIUM OXIDE X
POTASSIUM MONOXIOK
SILICON DIOXIDE X
TDS
NA
O.I 5
0.40
Q.01
NA
I7B
7f,l
7'J
759000
30400
1 1 ROOD
2HUOO
NA
7 . :)5
o.ir,
0 . (16
0.01
17!)
Ifll
412
H9900
19:1000
72
1 39000
HHH
KlfiO
NA
0.22
o . :i i
(1 . 04
NA
188
756
20000
1 .'100000
r, 2:100
110000
64500
NA
:i.26
2.83
NA
<0.()1
NA
NA
NA
88200
199000
lift
IOHOOO
518
NA
NA
0.15
0.7G
0.01
NA
215
9H4
1240000
40400
124000
26HOO
NA
NA
0.21
0.25
1.4H
NA
25H
9(.2
1 1 8000
If. 90000
80800
I.I5IIOO
48700
NA
-------
(ZCO(M) ASH FX1KACT
SAMI'I h Nl'MHKK:
I) 11.111 ION FACIOK:
I)KS( HI IT I ON:
I NITS:
/,( -All -Olliro? /( -All -1)011)11120 /( All OOIH'IOX /('-All 00 ISAU /( - AH-OU II'CI I'l /.C-AII-()01TCI.|'i:
ASH hVI'KAl I ASH KXTKAl I ASH KX'I'KACT ASH KXTKACT ASH KX I'HAl I' ASH KXTHACT
*** HASt/NKl'THAI.S »**
I'l1 CAS NO COHIHHJNI)
NO PAHAMKTKKS DKTKCTKI) FOR THIS CATE(iOKY
7
U1
CJ
-------
(XC004) ASH KXTKAC I
SAHI'I K NIJMBKK:
Dlll'l ION KA< TOU:
W'SCKIITION:
UNI I'S:
/(•-AII-OOK (12 /( -All ()01l)llli:(> /.(-All 001HMOX /C-AII-001SAU /C AII-OlMTCI.I'l /C-AII-001T( l.l'i!
ASM tXnARAMKTERS DKTKCTKD FOR THIS CATEGORY
-------
(/(•(Ml I) ASM mUAtT
?
en
SAMI'I.I NIIMIIKK:
IHl.t'l KIN ¥IU Kill:
DKSI Kll'l KIN:
(INI IS:
/i AH iiniiii;: /( AM
/i MI 0011 nox /< MI OOISAK /r AH imiinri xi -Aii-oo-irri.i'2
««»
IT
.,
1
0
H
10
II
12
1 1
15
20
21
INOHIiANICS ***
CAS NO UNWHINII
AHSF.NIC
UAH HIM
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
COI'I'KH
1 110N
I.KAIt
MAN<;ANKSK
MKIK IIKY
SOU 1 OH
ZINC
ASM I \IK\l
IK./I
I 10
I.I
101
7HH
i r, looo
I27OOO
ASH KXIHAI I
(II, /I.
2f. •
171
H.O
12
r>:t
2. i
O..I2
I 10000
ASM I-XIKAI I
IMi/l.
ASH I'XIKACI
ASH l-XIUAl I'
IK./I,
ASH KXT
IK./I.
I'.IH
H!»7
:io
2:100
24:100
MHO
2'Jf.O
140000
OHWO
IH2
r,.z
II
Ti
127000
H'.)
2fi:i
!I70
G. 1
(>(>
II. 1(1
r> i m
0.1!)
IlltllOOO
47100
22:1
7S8
102
41
40:i(IO
•J470
2750
12:1000
f>l!)00
-------
(ZniOl) ASH HXTHACI
SAMI'Lh NliMBEH:
1)11IH ION KACTOK:
II(-S( UI IT I ON:
UNITS:
*** (iKOCHKMICAI. PARAMETERS ***
I'l' CAS NO COMWUNU
/.(-AII-()(MC()2 Z< -AH-0041)11120 ZC-AII-001HTOA ZC-AII-004SAK /C-AIMMMTCLI'I /.( -AH-OOITCLI'V
ASH tXTKACT ASH I-X I KA( T ASH KX TRACT ASH IX'IHACT ASH hX TRACT ASH EXTRACT
TOO
AMMONIA
NITRATK
ORTIIO PHOSPHATE
TOTAL ALKALINITY
CHLOKIDK
SULKATK
ALUMINUM OXIDE X
CALCIUM OX I OK X
MAGNESIUM OXIDE X
POT ASS I I'M MONOXIDE X
SILICON 1)10X1 DF X
TDS
NA
0.19
0.07
-------
(/COOS) ASH KXTKA1 T
.SAMI'I.K NIJMBHK:
IMI.IIl ION HACTOH:
I>HS( UII'TION;
IINI IS:
/,( -All-()0.ri( 02 /< AIMKIf.1111120 /( AI|-OO.r>H'IOX /( -All-005SAH /('-All-()0.ri I'CI.I'I /( -All-OOf) ICI
ASH KXI'KA( I AMI fXIHACI ASH I-M'HA( T ASH KXTKAl I1 ASH I- X I UA( T ASH I-X1KAIT
*** IIASK/NMITHAI.S ***
I'l' CAS NO COMIHHJNI)
NO I'ARAMKTFHS DKTECTED FOR THIS CATEGORY
-------
UC005) ASH hXTRACl
SAMI'I.K NUMBKR:
Dll.lSIION FACrO
INSCRIPTION:
/I -All-00!i«>2 /( -All -I)(
ASH IXliniT ASH f \TKACI
/( -AM-l)l)f>H'l'()\ /C-AH-OOSSAK /( -AII-()0.r)T('l.l'l /C-AII-ODftTCI.I'Z
ASH KXTKACT ASH KX1HA(T ASH MTHACT ASH KXTKACT
*** ACIDS ***
IT CAS NO COMPOUND
NO I'AHAMFTKRS DKTECTEU KOR THIS CATKGORY
£
-------
(/< oor,) ASM I:\IKAI r
7
S
SAMI'l.h NIIMIIIK:
HI I III KIN I AMOK:
III SI Kll'l ION:
liNI IS:
/I Ml llll'HIi;1 /( All IIOI.IIIII.'O /( All ()()!,ll'im /( -All OOf.SAK /.(' All OIISKI.I'I /C-AII-OOfiH M'2
**t INllldiANH'S ***
I'I' ( AS NO ( (WOUND
I
I,
H
in
n
12
II
r,
20
21
AliStNIC
UAH I IIH
( ADMIIIM
( IIUOHIIIM
I (il'1'KH
IKON
HANdANKSK
HKKIIIKY
SODIUM
7.1NC
AMI 1 MX U 1
IH./I
IIH
HI
H.f,
1,1
12
IV.)
H:M
I r.r.ooo
77.10
AMI 1 \IIIAI 1
IK./I,
1 II
1 1
\2
IH 100(1
I.I.I
AMI I.VIHAC'I ASH I-XIKAM ASH KVIUAII
III, /I, IK, /I. Ill, /I.
'i'i
;'.:\ I2'» 201
I2OO 71,1
(,'., 7.') H.O
1 :i')0 H . f. 2'» 1
•Hi/0 !I7 III
r.H.II) 2'»f>0
2C>00 f>.7 I'tOO
0.!>fi
If, ;,ooo ii.dooii ificooou
r,(if,(io 1:12 izsoo
ASH I-XIIIACI
III, /I,
2-1
28
1 2fiO
2114
r,(,«
20800
ROUI)
:<7(>o
IOIIIOO
H 1,0(10
-------
(/( OOfi) ASH KXIUACI'
SAMI'LI- NIIMHKH:
hill I ION IA< fliK:
HI-SI KII'1 ION:
IIM'IS:
*** (iKOUIKMH.'AL I'AKAMKTKHS ***
I'l' CAS NO COMPOUND
AMMONIA
NITKATR
ORTIIO I'HOSI'HATK
TOTAL ALKALINITY
( HLOKIDK
SOI.KATE
ALUMINUM OXlOt X
CALIIIIM OXIDE X
MAGNKSltIM OXIDE X
POTASSIUM MONOXIDE
SILICON DIOXIDE X
I'DS
S
/( - MI-005102 /C 4ll-00.~il)IH2o /.( -AII-OO.'iH'im /( -AII-005SAK /C-AII-005 I'l LI'I /C-AII~OOfiTCLl'2
ASH KX'IKAl P ASM IMKAII ASH KXTMAl I ASH KXIHAIT ASH hXIHACT ASH KMKAlT
NA
0. 15
1.59
0.02
NA
195
777
85
GK-1000
25HOO
142000
2(>900
NA
0.24
0. 10
0.01
•|f>8
207
:I88
50 100
115000
42
I 5 9000
1 5<;o
I I 20
NA
0.19
0 . 56
0. II
NA
I 90
I 050
32:100
1:150000
5:i:ioo
1 27000
20900
NA
5.15
2.8H
NA
0.01
NA
NA
NA
82100
1 7:1000
4 :to
i :i<;ooo
1410
NA
NA
0. Ifi
0.78
0.01
NA
189
58."i
1:120
1 1 10000
39400
8.! 2 00
51700
NA
0.21
0.21
1 . 12
NA
281
1 1 10
1 10000
1 500000
74800
1211000
7170
NA
-------
S\MI'IE NUMBER:
Ml III ION FACTOR:
DESCRIPTION:
I'M ITS:
/.I)-AH-U01(02 /D-AII-001(11 Hill) ZU-AII-OOIKI'TOX ZD-AII-OOIHAR ZI)-AII-001Tf l.l'l ZD-AH-OOITCLP2
ASH KxrifAn \sn KM'KAI T ASH FXTRA
-------
S\MI'I F. NI'MRFR:
DIU'IIUN FACTOR:
lit S('HI IT I ON:
I M (S:
ZIl-AH-OOKDL' 7H AH-OOinil^n ZI>-AH-OOIKPTO\ 7D-AH-OOISAK /l)-AII-OOIT( I.PI Zll AII-OOITCLP2
\SH KXTKAIT ASH KXTHACT ASM KX TRACT ASH KXTRACT ASH EXTRACT ASH EXTRACT
*** ACIDS ***
IT CAS NO COMPOUND
NO PARAMETERS DETECTED FOR THIS CATEGORY
7
ro
-------
OOOSH
OOZ'JI
OS 1.1.
OOI11Z
OOSSi
Htl
M.I
Of.'J
III
OOlill'J
(K)O(IHI. 1
01 M
OO'jOl
(17.7.1
1 I
(KH
ur.i
HII:
•ji: ooroi: ii
oofi'ii: 011211: oo'izi.
ozn
(Kin:
001 iZ
,"H 17. r.i
'j(i(
7.'.\7. Of.Z 107.
Hi7.
H.I\:I HSV .1 iviim nsv I..IVHI\.-I nsv .1 >vnm HSV DVHIXH nsv i >vm\.| ns\
ILIOO liv (i/ 1.11.tiKiii nv ii/ IIVSMKI nv ii/ vi LI it ;:ni
-------
SAMI'I K NUMBER:
Dill1! ION FACTOR:
hl-SCHI IT ION:
I'M IS.
**« (,KOCHEM1CAL PARAMETERS ***
IT CAS NO COMPOUND
/I) \ll-ni) l( D2 /||- AII-OOIDIII20 /I) -AH-OOIH'IOX /D-MI-OOISAR yi)-AII-(H)IT< I H 111- MI-UU ITCI.I':
\SII KUR\
-------
(/D002) ASH KXTHA1 T
S\MI'I K NIJMBKR:
III I III ION FAfTOH:
WS< 1(11'TION:
I'M IS:
7D-AII-(W2CU2 /D-AII 0021)11120 /l)-AII-0()2Krrox ZO-AH-002SAR /I)-AH-002T01.PI ZO-AH-002TCI.P2
ASH I-XTRMT ASH hXTRAl I ASH KXTRACT ASH KXTRACT ASH KXTHACT ASH EXTRACT
*** RASK./NKUTRAl.S ***
PI' CAS NO COMPOUND
NO PARAMETERS DETECTED FOR THIS CATEGORY
Si
-------
UIUI02) ASH K.MIUC T
S \MIM.h NUMBER:
1)1 ll>I ION I-ACTOR:
M SCHI I'll ON:
IIM IS:
/D-AII-(I<>2(02 /l)-AII-l)()2l)IH^l) /ll-AH-OO^KITOX /.D-AH-OOilSAK /.I)-AII-002TCI.PI /I)-AII-U02TCI.F2
ASH KXIKAII ASH HXTKACI ASH KXTKAfr ASH I-XTHACI ASH KXI'HACT ASH EX'IHACT
*** ACIDS ***
I'P CAS NO COMPOUND
NO PARAMETERS DETECTED FOR THIS CATEGORY
-------
UU002) IVSH
SVMril- NliMHKH:
III I III ION I AI H'H:
liisrifll'l KIN:
IIM IS:
»*» INOKI.ANII S ***
rr < AS NO
I
I,
H
10
I I
\2
I I
20
MAR I IIH
( AOHIliM
(IIHOMIIIM
(OI'I'KK
IKON
I,I-All
MANCiANKSK
HKKCIIKY
SODIUM
ZINC
ASH |r \||(A( 1
Ill./l.
.ir. i
i in
ir.i;
'.in
O.f,2
vmoo
.101,011
ASH I'MIMI 1 ASH 1 \IIIAM ASH 1 K 1 If \( C
IK. /i. i'c/1. i.t./i.
2,ri!» lf.2 20*1
1 too
•III
77 1172 70
1200
1 '17(1(1
2710
O.'JO 0.27
•121.00 52500 12100
'.).? Df.i.oo :i:i
ASH 1 \IK\I 1
IIH
IOHO
Hr.H
10200
20HO
o. 1:1
1 l:UHHK)
7 f, 10(1
ASH KXTRAri
1 10
i r.fio
7!)'.)
I2f.
:I2HOO
2:i!)OII
1750
(iH.100
11.1000
-------
(/D002) ASH I \IR\I T
MIMBKR:
hi I I'I ION h All UK:
III SI Kll'l ION:
I'M IS:
*** l.KOCIIKMICAI. I'ARAMKTKKS ***
I'l' CAS NO COMIHHiNI)
/IP-\n nni'ini: /II-MI i)i)2mii:'o /i> -\n-oo2H''io\ /II-MI-UO^SAK /n-Aii-oo2i< i N /D-MI-OOZCI n>;
ASM IXTHVI \SII I MUM!' ASH I-\PKACT ASH I ATKAl I ASH (•AlliACT ASH HX1RACT
7
£
T()C
AMMONIA
NITHATK
OK UK) I'llOSI'IIATK
TOTAL AI.KAI INI H
rill OKI UK
SIII.KAIK
ALUMINUM OMDt X
CAl.C 1UM OXIDK X
MAtiNbSII'M 0X11)1- X
IHVI'ASSHIM MONOXIDK X
SILICON 1)10X11)1- %
IDS
NA
0.07
<().() I
NA
77.2
572
7:V»OM)
43100
27900
NA
1). 1 'J
0. 1 I
0. II
70.2
HHfiOO
30400
479
H42
NA
0. If)
0 . 00
o.or,
NA
H2.2
I) (iti
IH200
1100000
7H700
34100
45000
NA
9. '14
3.77
NA
<0.01
NA
NA
NA
84200
241000
r,2
31200
H02
NA
NA
0.12
0.08
0.01
NA
IOH
703
4C2
a MOOO
70200
32000
32 100
N<\
NA
0.19
0. 12
0.4H
NA
1 11
H72
103000
1470000
121000
40900
143000
NA
-------
(yi«m:i) ASH I-VIKA< i
S\MI'II NIIMIIKH.
Ill I II ION I-AC IOK:
HfS( KIITION:
I M IS:
/D-AII -mi 11111: /i) \n mniiiiiL'o /.n \n utMH'hn /D-AII (iois\i< /CD-AII-OO IK i i'i /i) -AII-DO irci.r:
ASH h\ll(\( I \SII HMUAl I' ASM I-XI'KAI I' ASH K1THAI T ASH hXIUAlT ASH KXII(A(T
**« I1ASK/NHITRAI.S ***
I'I' CAS NO rOMlfHJNI)
NO I' \UAMKTKKS DKTKTKI) FOR THIS CATE(i(lK\
-------
SIIIJ.
UN
.!..>VJU.XH HSV .1 1VII.IAH IISV
i i.)i.i:(io iiv-d'/ i,n ).it oo-iiv-d/
IIVHJAH IISV IH'H.IVH IISV
-nv-d/ voi.Hfiin-nv-ii/
I )\ H I \ H HS\ I IV M I \ •! IISV
o-in -n/ r.o n oo n\ -v* NIII i 11 PI
i ivti.m HSV
-------
(/mm:i> ASH mi2
liTiOO
25700
I/HO
•1Hf,(HI
CIIUOO
-------
VN
000 9 t 1
OOdZ?.
OO'Uli
OOO'jfit,
odiiot: i
it'll-
I;M;H
VN
y.t • i
HIM)
OZM)
VN
I. IVMIX-I ii;;x
\N
(HIZI I.
OO'j I Z
oodi:i
01)0 IHH
H-I:
SZ'J
not
VN
1 0 • 0
!()M)
1 1 •{)
VN
1 IV M 1 \ -1 II!JV
VN
(.HI,
ooooz
HI;
OOOfiOZ
OOHKI
VN
VN
VN
urn>
VN
9Ti;
Z'Ol
.1 IVH.IX-I IISV
VN
otn-iz
000/.I
00!l
I:OMI
•JIM)
VN
1 IVJII \ 1 II'. \
(,(.') \N
HI i mm?.
(KIHHl OOli'j'l
I i ooo'ji:
O(I(K;C>I OOOHOI:
OOtiifi 'II
ii-;: !)i:i:
T\'J i ' M:
HHP. VN
(dM)> t(IMI>
HIM) rrro
1 1 Ml 10 M)
/•()! VN
i i\ n\ \ i in. v i )\)ii x i m,v
siij
x '-idixoid NIDI us
% -IdlYONOH WlllSSVKM
X HdlXO N!IIS-INr>VH
X .4111X0 M II.)IV.)
X 1111X0 NDNINIIIV
Hl-V.-t'lllS
3d 1 HO III.)
MINI IVM'IV 'IVKU
a.LVHilb'OIM OlllIK)
a.U'Hi 1 N
V 1 NONNV
,X)J
UNfKUNO.)
»** SM:H.I HWVHV.I
CM
1"^
ei
ON SV ) .1.1
'IV HN.-III.MH'> ***
'SI l\ 1
:NOI MM )', KI
MOI IV 1 Mil 1 1 1 hi
m-v?u\-i HSV (rood/)
-------
(71)001 ) ASH I \IKAI I
S\MI'lh NIIMHKU:
Ulll'l KIN F ACTOK:
IIHSI 1(1 IT I ON:
I Ml rii:
/D-AII-llflli 02 /.I) All UOIDIIIL'l) /D-AII OOIU'IOX /I) -All-dO ISAM /!»- All-lid I ICI.I'I /D-AII-OO'ITCI.P/!
ASH MI'HU I' ASH KXI'MACI ASH KX fKACT ASH EXTRA! T ASH I-XTRACT ASH 1-XTKACT
*** HASK/NHITKAI.S ***
I'l' (AS NO COMCOUNI)
NO PARAMETERS DETECTED FOR THIS CATEGORY
-------
IZDOOD ASH mini i
SAMI'U NIJMBFR:
III I ID KIN FACTOR:
HI'Si 1(1 IT I (IN:
UNITS:
/D-AH-OOIco;; /li-AII004111112(1 X.I)-,MI-l)0-IHT(lX /II-AH'OO ISAH /.D-AII-00 IT( I I'l 7D-AH-DO ITCI.1'2
ASH KXIKAI I ^Sll K\TKA(1 ASH HXIUAIT ASH hXTIiACT ASH FXIHACi ASH (•XIHAIT
*** ACIDS ***
I'l' CAS NO COMI-OliNIl
NO I'AHAMKTKRS DFTKCTKI) FOR THIS CATEGORY
-------
OO'.MU OdlH'j
iioi 01 o()(i(i,: ii
noiii: (i'j«jz
OOfZZ O'JOI-
ooot:«j
t:iis i:z
5M
•|/!)ll 'I/1!!!
.UVHm HSV 1. IVJim HSV
7.\ mnnt 17. ooz-ji
00!)';Z OOHif 001 IZ OO'jCiZ
L7.'tt I-Z'O iZ'O ii'O
OOliZI ZOZ
O'.l 1 H
<>!' HHI t.'j 'IIZ
i'H
M'l ."II
l'<'.7. HIZ 017. 17.7.
'l/'lll 'l/!)ll l/')!l l/')ll
1 )V)IIX^ HSV I.IVMIVI HSV 1 IV Ml 1H II'. V 1 IVMI\| ||«, v
.INI/
WIIKIOS
Atlll.lHUH
HS'iNVMNVH
NOMI
1H. 1,10)
Hill HI mil)
Hl)IHS'IH
HOI. IV 1 NOI hi III)
ri.uino-iiv-u/ i.iiiiiDi) HV H/ m'stoo nv
-------
1/1)004) ASH tXIKACl
SAMI'I F NIIMHKK:
III 1.1'I ION FACTOR:
III-SI If I IT I ON:
tIM IS:
**« (itonitMK A I. PAKAMFTF.KS ***
I'l' CAS NO COMIWNI)
AMMONIA
NITKATK
ORT1IO PHdSI'lUTE
TOTAL ALKALINITY
(HIOKIIIK
SIILKATK
ALUMINUM OX I OK. I
< AI.CIIIM OXIDK X
MAGNtSIIIM OXIDK X
m'lASSIIIM MONOXIDK
Sli.HON IIIDXllil- X
ros
•p
•«J
01
/I)- \ll-00lt 02 /!)-MI-0(MI)llli!0 /D-AH-WMH'IOV /D-AII-00 ISAK /II-AII-IHUK I.I'l /I)-AH-00 ITCI l'2
ASH HXIKAI I A'1" hMKAl I ASH hXTKAM \SH h\IKA(T ASH h\IIC\rr ASH KXIKACT
NA
0.07
0.2f.
<0.01
NA
4C>.9
5 2.'t
3!)
550000
4r.:MH>
17700
2 til Oil
NA
1 1. 1
1) . OH
0.0:i
7100(1
200000
U.6
l.'ttOO
042
f,'JH
NA
0.14
0.06
O.(i:t
NA
f.H.7
f>29
1 (>200
1250000
85100
IU300
49100
NA
15.2
:t.9i
NA
<0.01
NA
NA
NA
7H800
202000
:uu
1(1500
70:1
NA
NA
o . I :i
0.05
0.01
NA
a:i.9
(iliO
422
970000
G 120(1
1 6900
27500
NA
NA
0. 19
0.03
1 . 5f,
NA
r,H . <;
t;:t7
9G400
1670000
10BOOO
1 H600
I2:sooo
NA
-------
(/DOOM ASH KVfKAl I
S \Mm NIJMIIHt:
1)1 II'I I UN l-ACTOIt.
Ill-Si MII'TION:
IIM l!i:
/II-AII-IIOM Oi! /D-AII-imfiDIH^o /.l>-AH-(ltir>mo\ /.D-AII-OOfiSAK /I) AM-0(l.rri ri.l'l /D-AII 01):") I'd,1
ASH hXIKAl I' ASH I-\II(A('I ASH I-\TKA("I ASH HIKAIT ASH KXI'KACI ASH tX'lH/UT
**« UA.SK/NHI'IKAI.S ***
I'l' CAS NO COMHlUNI)
NO I'AHAMkTKHS DKTKTKt) FOK THIS CATEGOKY
-------
(/DOOf,) ASH KXIKAC'I
'.ANI'I I- NUMIIKK:
HUH ION KACTOK:
MSi KMT I ON:
I M TS:
/.D-AII-OOr.Uli! /l)-AII-OOr.l)l 11^(1 /l)-MI-OO.r)H'll)A /I)-Ml-()().r.HAH /D-AII OOfi I'CI.I'I /.l)-AII-0()rilCI.I7
ASH KX'IKACI \SII KXIKAII' ASH I-XTKACI ASH I-X I'HAC T A.SH HMKAIT ASH
*** A( IDS ***
IT CAS NO COMPOUND
NO I'ARAMh TKHS l)t: DOITED FOR THIS CATKGOR\
-------
(100 (!)
ooiHt:
d'Jl'J
OOZ'JZ
OIIOCOl
001 1
•i'jl
HI'I
•JH'J
ooiri'
001)001' 1
d(;(. i
0'10'J
OKU
TH
'IX 1
•Jl'7.
;i i ooi.'O'j
007. V7. ()()'.>!)£
7.Y, '0 (\7. '0
(HK.t
didli
(UIHOI
•j'.) 'JH
Oi'j
!»'.H M.7.
(.1 OOIIHI
i)0it:t: 001.'.)?.
di'.H
Oil
OH V)
r.'ii
V)im IIKV
:KI INll
:M)| 1,11)1 IS III
:?IOI >V I Nut III I Kl
:»Htll»ilN H I.IKVS
-------
(/iu)05) ASH
SAMI'l.t NIIMHFR:
1)11,1 I ION KACTOK:
III-SC HirriON:
liM IS:
*** (.MM IIKMK Al. PAHAMHI-HS ***
IT I AS Nl) ( OMIHHINI)
/II-AII-0(>:>( 02 /.ll-AII-OO.r.l»IH20 /II-AII-OO&KI'IOX /l)-AII-()()f)S\H /D-AII OOIKU'I /.I)- All-llOfi ICI.I';
ASH mi(A( I \SII l-\l'l(\( I ASH I-\II(A(T ASH !• \IKA1T VSII KVIKACI ASH KXTKACT
AMMONIA
NITRATE
OKI HO PHOSPHATE
TO'IAI ALKALINITY
Clll OK 11)1-
SI.LKATf
ALUMINUM OX I OK X
I Al,( IHM OX IDF Z
MA(;NKSIIIM OXIDK x
IX)TASSIIIM MONOXIDI'
SILICON 1)1 OX I UK X
TltS
NA
O.OH
0.24
500
:wt;oo
:)8000
NA
1 4 . :!
:t.7i
NA
0.01
NA
NA
NA
77900
194000
145
1 1500
877
NA
NA
o. 1:1
o.o:»
0.01
NA
'JO . H
5:11
3370
796000
5(1 :)()()
14601)
25600
NA
NA
0. 18
0.03
i . :i8
NA
Ml. 4
4.18
102000
yfiiooo
94100
15100
1 1 HOOO
NA
-------
SAMPl.t NUMBER:
IHIl'TION FACTOR;
Iil-Si HIPTION:
UM IS:
ZE-AII-OOH02 IV. AH-OOIIMH2C) ZE-AII-OOIKI'TOX ZE-AH-OOtSAR 7K-AII-OOIK LP1 ZE-\H-001TCLP2
ASH EXTRACT VSH t<1HA( f ASH EXTRACT ASH EXTRACT ASH EXTRACT ASH EXTRACT
**« BASE/NEUTRALS ***
PP CAS NO COMPOUND
Gr,-85-0
BENZ01C ACID
f>6T
00
-------
SVU'I.K NUMBER:
H11 I'll UN FACTOR:
HKSi HIHTI ON:
I'M IS:
7K- \II-OOK 02 /K-,MI-UOII)|II20 71--AII-001 FI'T<>\ 71--AII-(K) I S-\K 7E-AH-00 ITC1.C1 Zf- AII-OOITCLI'2
ASH t\rin(i \sn h\ri(A(i ASM MIKACT \sn KTRAH ASH KXTKA< T ASH EXTRACT
»** -M IDS ***
I'P ( AS NO rnMIOUND
NO PARAMETERS DETECTED FOR THIS CATEGORY
-------
SNMI'lh
0111 11 UN f A( lull:
HI Si lill'l HIM:
I'M IS:
/> All 00 11 OJ
\SII hXII.'M I
/I- Ml 01111)11121) /h \ll Oil 1 1 l'lll\
All OOISAI1 /K All
\SII I MUM I
ASM I-\IKAt I
W./\.
AMI H \IIIAI I
I H l.l'l /F.-AH OOnri.1'2
\SII h\ II(A( I
(Ki/l
ASM K\1I(A(T
HC/L
>«« INOIK.ANICS ***
IT (AS NO COWnilNI)
to
1
1,
8
10
II
1"
1 1
20
21
IIAHHIM
( ADMIHH
(IIKOMII'H
(UITKK
IHON
I.F.AI)
MANCANKSK
SODIUM
1 1 NC
IH2
Hf>noo
HHIO
I'll.
177
O.H5
72700
20
22H
•181
S2200
1 0700
2710
(I. 4 I
82800
82400
l(. I
1.0
1>HOOO
41
2 IH
l ir.oooo
I I '.100
:i:to
r,o
1:11,000
H8IO
0.5H
8(1200
82700
-------
'.\\ll'l I- NI'MHKK:
I'll 11 ION K.M TON:
HHS( HI I'll ON:
I \lIS.
*«* CHI! IIEHK Al. PARAMFCKKS ***
IT CAS N<1 COMPOUND
/I-\II-001(()J /!•- Ml -OHIDlll'Ji) /.I - UI-OOII |>T().\ /.t. -.\ll-001S Mi /I -All (101 11 I. H /I- -AII-OOI |l I.P2
ASH mn\< i \sn i \ii<\< r \sn !• \IK-MI \sn KXTKAI i ASH fxrmci ASH HATKACT
TOT
ANMONI A
N1THATK
ORTHO I'llOSPHATK
TOTAL ALKALINITY
(11101(1 lit
SUI.FATE
ALUMINUM OXIDE X
CALCIUM OXIDE X
MAGNESIUM OUIlF X
POTASS ItH MONOXIDf
SILICON DIOXIDF x
IDS
NA
0.27
0.3!)
uooo
61000
4291)0
1 1 500
NA
NA
0.44
0.16
1.99
NA
470
1010
152000
2 1 '10000
1 16000
50200
120000
NA
-------
I/K002) ASM KXTHAI I
SAMI'I.K NIJMBF.R:
HIU'1 ION FACTOR:
hl-SC KI IT I ON:
I NlIS:
/I--AII-002UC' /K - AII-002IHII20 /K-AH-(M)2KI'T()X ZK-AII-002SAR /K-AII-OOncl.PI ZK-AH-002Tfl.l'2
ASH Ki'hAcr ASH MIKAI ( ASH muAi'i ASH hxiKAci ASH txruAcr ASH KXIHACT
*** UASK/NKHTRAI.S ***
I'l' CAS N() (DM1HHIM)
NO PARAMETERS DETtCTCU FOR THIS CATEGORY
7
00
en
-------
ASM h \1KAl
SAMI-IT NUMHKK:
1)11 I I ION FACTOR:
Ill-Si KII'TION:
liMIS:
/I- Ml-0(1^1 DL' /(• -Ml OO^DIII^O Xh-AII OOl'moX /I--All IMJ2SAR /l-.-AH-OOZTCI.I'l '/ f-AII-()02T( I.I'Z
ASH I-K1KAI I ASH h XTUAI I ASH HCI'RACI ASH KXTHAC1 ASH KXTKA1 T ASH 1>X TRACT
*** ACIDS ***
I'l- CAS NO COMItHINI)
NO I'ARAMKTKRS DKThCTEl) FOR THIS I ATEUOHY
-------
OOH'J
001 OH
1 '7.
o I HI;
OH.!)
OO'J 1 H
OCOI
i) | %
'JH'J
r.u
nor-Ji
OOOOOl 1
mil i
HH
01
irz
I:M
'.i'i
OOIini
HI '(I
L7.\
Hill
mr.it>}
IKIIM'H
l'7. '()
01 Cit'
llt'lfi
ooHii
(U 1 'J
!IH
1-7.1
<:t\
>}\: o';iz
oori'j ooiH'j
oir
iii'i
Z7.
\.7.\ (HI
il
Odl IUI
INI 7
HIIKIIIS
Ulll DUN
1SMNV!)NVM
(IVI'I
NOIII
NM.MO )
HIIIWOllll 1
HIHHIIV.I
HDIIIVII
i ,;
(\r.
•ji
1 1
f.\
ii
01
H
•1
1
00
.ivum iis-v
v M
i IVHI\I H',v .i.iviiixi MSV i ivn.m HSV i IVIMX-I ir;v
I.)I7.(II) -IIV M IIVS^OII IIV I/ \IH.II700 IIV- I/ ()7.IIKI..OO IIV M .:
-------
(/M>02) ASH
S \MI1I NliMHKK:
Illl II ION KACTOH:
l>l SI Kl I'l ION:
I M IS:
*** (iHM'MKMICAI. I'ARAMKTKRS ***
I'l' CAS NO COMIMIiNO
TIM
AMMONIA
NITHATt:
OHTIIO I'HOSI'IIATK
TOTAL Al KAI.INin
CHLORIDK
SI) I. F Alt
ALUMINUM OX I DC X
(AlClliM OX I OK X
MA(,NH,IIM OX I HI- X
1WASSIUM MONOXIDI' X
SILK ON DIOIIDI- X
IDS
/K-AII IIIL:( nij /H MI IIO^DIII:.'" /h-Mi oirjfi'i'ox /i--AiM)(i2SAii /!• - \H (mz\t \ n i\- AII-OO^K i n
\SII l-XIKAl I \SII IXIUAU ASH I-X I IM( T \SII h\TI(A(l ASM h \ I'UVf ASH KXIKAfT
NA
0.2H
0.39
<0.01
NA
171
fi.tf.
920000
4 1 :
-------
(/HMV.1) ASH I-Mil At I
S\MI'U NI'MHKK:
Dill I ION KACro
HI SI KII'I'ION:
I.M IS:
/K AH (101(1)2 /K-AII (10.11)11120 /K-AII (>0:iH''IO\ /K-AII 00 l.'iAli /h - All-(KH'H l.l'l /.}• -AII-DDUTI l.l'2
XSII MIKAI I ASH KMKAi I ASH hMHACI ASM l-VIUAl I ASM !• \TKA( T ASH
<*» HASK/NKUTKALS ***
I'l' CAS NO CUMI'OIINI)
NO I'AIMMKTEHS DUKCTED I'OH THIS CATKGOK\
-------
'.\HI1I NlMIIHi:
HIM I ION IM I UK:
Dh'.i Kll'l ION
t\lIS.
ASH I-VIHM r
/I- MI-00 II 1C /I -AII-IIO IDIir.'O /)•-MI-IIII.IM'll)K /h-AII IIO.tSAK / K- All-1)1).11( l.l'l /!• - AII-00 IT( 1,1':
ASM h \IK\i I AMI I-\IKAI I \.SH HMKAl I ASH t\'IH\CT ASH h\ll
-------
(7KU03) ASH KXIIIAI'I
SXMI'I.K N1IMMHK:
tlll.lll ION KACIUIJ:
DtSCKIITION:
UNI IS:
*«* INOKCANK'S ***
!•!• CAS Nil ('(WOUND
I
(l
8
10
II
VI
20
24
IIARUIM
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
COI'I'KR
IRON
I.KAI)
MAN(iANKSK
MKHCIIHY
SODIUM
7. INC
ASH 1 \IKAI 1 ASH h\IHA< 1
I'l./l IKJ/I.
I7H I2H
III
112 I:M
1 12
4r>
l r>6<)
G.3 0.96
79IOO H2700
!(Hf>0 .'15
ASM K VIII ACT
IKJ/I.
20fi
f>7R
R1
2220
55.100
7790
2710
0.59
HOHOO
4 ROOD
ASH KXIKAtT ASH KXIHACT ASH EXTRACT
:i:io 458 384
2-.I 524
239
HH 119 39
162000
4110
3B4 3970
O.(i4 0.27
(>2200 1590000 85000
42 222 56700
-------
(ZE003) ASH I-XTRACT
SAMPLE NUMBER:
DIII'TION FACTOR:
I)KS( HI IT I ON:
UNITS:
*** (.EOTIIEMICAI. PARAMETERS ***
IT CAS NO rOMItMIND
/E-*ll-003<02 /(•-All-OU.inilUO /.E-AII-003EPTOX ZK-AH-003SAK 7.K-AH-00:1TCI.I'1 /K-AH-0():iTCI.I7
ASH mRACT ASH h XTHAC T ASH KX'IKAtT ASH KXTHACT ASH KXTKACf ASH EXTRACT
TOC
ANNUNIA
NITRATE
ORTHO PHOSPHATE
TOTAL ALKALINITY
CHLORIDE
SULFATE
ALUMINUM OX IDE t
CALCIUM OXIDE X
MAGNESIUM OXIDE X
POTASSIUM MONOXIDE
SILICON DIOXIDE X
TDS
NA
0.30
0.41
-------
siiij. aoj aai.)3i:i(i S-HSIS
ON
(INIUMWO.) ON KV.I ,1,1
*** SIVMLIISN/HSVtl ***
J..)VJU.X1 IISV ,I,.)VHI\.-I IISV I, IVH.I.X1 IISV J,.)VH!\1 IIHV I IVH.I X-I IISV .1 IVJI.m IISV
V-37 Id-I.UKKI-IIV-H/ HVSKIO-IIV-37 XOI.Hl (IO-IIV-.1/ OZIIKIIOd IIV'-H/ 5;o II (10 IIV -\l
Nd11,1 PI IS
:MOJ. )V.H NOI 111 I Ml
:HHtlWUN fl.lhVS
I. >V>I.IXH IISV ( MMM/)
-------
-------
(/Mill I) ASH IMIIAI I
S\MI'II- NUMIlHi:
III Mil ION I-AI TDK:
III-SI HIM ION:
I'M IS:
»»« INOItliANICS ***
IT CAS NO COMI1HIND
I
I,
H
II)
II
12
II
IS
20
21
HAH HIM
(ADM HIM
(lll«m I UK
(UI'I'KK
II10N
I.KAI)
MANliANKSE
MHIC1IHY
SODIUM
71 NC
/!• All IMIlMIL' /!• All OOIIIIII20 /.I All III! II l'lo\ /I- All (III ISAM /!• -All OOIICI.I'I /> -All OO'IK I
ASH I- XI HAD
I HI.
(I!)
Hf.7
7 I KID
2 (.HO
ASH 1 XIIMI 1
K./l.
1 IT,
:i2T,
liH'JIK)
111
ASH MIKACI ASH 1- V 1 1( \( 1
IK. /I IM./I
17.1 :i()2
•l'l!l
H.I
IliHO :i!ll
H2000
moo 112
2'JHO
o.or, 0.22
7i:ioo (,21110
ri.IC.00 |!I2
ASM 1 • \IKAI 1 ASH K \IKAl 1
lit. /I IUi/1.
2'l'l IOH
I!W Id!)
IH7
7C, 12
122000
.1 1 I.T.ilO
•IlldO ll.lliO
O.HO
II '10000 71000
M7')0 4'JHOO
-------
(/KOOI ) \SII h \IK\l I
S\Mm NliMHKH:
I'll II ION KA( TDK:
I>I-S< kll'TION:
I'M IS:
*** (iHX'IILMICAI. I'AHAMHHtS ***
IT CAS NO COMPOUND
/h All (11)11 0^ /I- All 0(111)111^(1 /(• AII-(IOIH'l(i\ /K-AII-OOISAK /h - All-Oil I ICI.I'I /I- -AII-IH) 1|( I \'2
ASH I-VIKAI i ASH i UUAI r ASH IXIHACI \sn KVIKAC i ASH (-MKACT ASH KXIHACI
£
TCK:
AHMONIA
NITRATK
ORTHO PHOSPHATE
TOTAL ALKALINITY
(HI.OHIDK
SUI.KATK
ALUMINUM OXIDK I
CAI.( IUM 0X1 UK X
NAGNKSIliM OX I UK X
POTASSIUM MONOXIDK X
SII.KON IHO\II>K X
rns
NA
o.:m
1.2:1
HOO
26700
NA
2:\.:\
0.42
o. i<;
<(l.01
H;I
4:1?
in
20MK)
.'(77000
100
4 .IHOO
2200
1 1 L'O
NA
o . r, i
0.22
0.74
NA
n;i2
926
1 34000
2050000
10:l()00
45200
61100
NA
24.')
4.0.t
NA
<0.01
NA
NA
NA
1 'JfiO
47:1000
HI
41200
2660
NA
NA
0.46
0.11
0.02
NA
477
1230
17.10001)
57:100
42000
10100
NA
NA
0 . 50
0. IH
1.01
NA
416
1 1)90
1 06000
2200000
106000
40HOO
124000
NA
-------
-------
(ZKUOfi) ASH H\II(A( I
',\MI'lh NI'MBKK:
DIM I ION UCTOK:
l)i M'KimoN:
(MIS.
/i--AII DD.'IKI,' /!• \n im:,mim> /K \n-oi).r.n'T(i\ /.K-AII-nor.sMi /(•-Aii-inifiK MM /h-
ASM 1-MRAi 1 V.ll I-MK-M I ASH M I'KAC'I ASH !• \THAI I AStl KXIHAU ASH
**« A( IDS ***
I'l1 CAS NO COMCOI.NI)
NO PARAMKTKKS DfTKCTEU H)K THIS CATRGOHV
-------
l/KUO.'i) ASM 1- \IIIAI I
SAMI'I.I- NIJMKKK:
Dlllll ION I At Illlt:
HI S( IUI'1 ION:
I'M IS:
*»* INOMCANirS »**
I'l' CA.S NO CMNI1HINI)
/(• All HO'ii dl' /I All 00!,IHII.:o /I- All OOfiH'liA /). AH UO!>S\I< /I All OOfilil.l'l /I -All-OOfi l'( 1.17
ASH I\II(A( I ASH K\IHA( I ASH I-X I HA< I ASH KXIKACI'
ASH mir>20i)
•111000
:uo
1 17
1 II.
(I.-IH
r. IHOO
101
170
III
li.O
r, i
HI-HI
1 1 1 0000
i lino
222
.101
III
Hi
H2'100
r>H:io
.1070
0.27
c.r.Hiio
:n,(ioo
-------
', VMI'U NliMHKK:
DIM I ION I-At TOIt:
ni-;>( in rrioN:
I M IS.
**» (.K)( IIKMH Al. I'AKAMI-IHiS ***
IT I'AS NO <'()MI1HJNI)
/K-AII-OOfn 02 /I All OOf,l>IH2o /(•-AII-OOfiH'im /h-AH-UOr,SAIi /K- All-OOfi 11 l.l'l /I--All-OOfi'll l,|'2
\SII I \llf\l I \',ll I-\IK\i I ASH hXIKAt I ASH KXII(A( I ASH l-VIHAl I ASH I-.XIKAIT
7
H->
8
AMMONIA
NITRATK
OKTHO I'HOSI'IIATK
TOTAL Al.hAI INm
(TILOHII)f
SIJI.KATK
ALUMINUM OX I OK X
CALCIUM OXIDK X
MAUNKSIIIM OXIDK X
POTASSIUM MONOXIDE X
SILICON 1)10X1 III- X
rns
NA
0.24
0. 14
. 8
.1.72
NA
<0.01
NA
NA
NA
.'I7HO
IblOOO
59
.14400
.•1770
\A
NA
0.21
0. IH
0.02
NA
:i42
i:ir,oooo
f, 25)00
:ur>oo
12.100
NA
NA
0.2t,
0. I C>
NA
:t:i4
101000
I'.IIIOOOO
H9000
i :tt,ood
NA
I-' CC
-------
|