vvEPA
                         United States
                         Environmental Protection
                         Agency
                       Municipal Environmental Research
                       Laboratory
                       Cincinnati OH 45268
                         Research and Development   EPA-600/D-82-256 August 1982
ENVIRONMENTAL
RESEARCH   BRIEF
                     Reactivation of Activated Carbon with
                    Aqueous Chlorine and Chlorine Dioxide

          Vernon L. Snoeyink, Richard A. Larson, Abraham S. C. Chen, Leon M. J. Kielmann I
            William F. McHie, John J. McCreary, James E. Quinn, and Evanelos A. Voudrias
                           University of Illilnois at Urbana-Champaign
                                     Urbana, IL 60801
Acknowledgements
At the time of this in-house study, the authors were with
the  Wastewater Research Division of the Municipal
Environmental Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio 45268.
Don C.  Niehus is currently with the U.S. EPA Water
Planning Division in Washington, D.C. 20460. Gregory A.
Brown is currently with the Stone & Webster Engineering
Corporation, Cherry Hill Operations Center, 3 Executive
Campus, P.O. Box 5200, Cherry Hill, New Jersey 08034.
The  current MERL contact for  this project is Janet M.
Houthoofd.

Abstract
Federal involvement in  water pollution abatement
programs has traditionally been focused on providing
grants to public entities for the construction of new,
expanded, or upgraded wastewater treatment facilities.
Despite  sizable investments of public funds, the achieve-
ment of water quality objectives is not being fully realized.
Although studies have documented that many factors
contribute to this problem, a chief cause is inadequate
attention to operation  and maintenance (O&M) require-
ments. This paper provides an overview of the contract
services currently being offered by private sector
consultants to assist municipalities in the operation and
management of wastewater treatment facilities. Over 100
responses were obtained to requests for information on
firms offering contract O&M services. Information received
included data on types of services offered, staffing levels,
and  staff  and firm achievements and capabilities.
Examination of these data showed that 24 firms now offer
                     full contract O&M services and that other firms could
                     potentially offer these services in the future.
                     This report covers a period from March 1979 to March
                     1980.

                     Introduction
                     Federal municipal water pollution control strategies have
                     relied on grant assistance for the construction of publicly
                     owned treatment works (POTW's). Since the passage of the
                     Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972
                     (PL 92-500), about $28 billion has been commited by the
                     Environmental Protection Agency Construction Grants
                     program to upgrade existing facilities and to build new
                     wastewater treatment facilities. The federal government
                     has consistently and strongly resisted suggestions that
                     federal subsidies or  other assistance be given to the
                     operation and maintenance (O&M) of POTW's. Only modest
                     technical assistance and O&M inspection programs are
                     operated at the federal and state levels.
                     Recent studies clearly indicate that a major percentage of
                     all POTW's are not meeting effluent standards. Studies
                     sponsored  by the Municipal Environmental  Research
                     Laboratory to identify the causes of poor plant performance
                     indicate that a large number of communities are unable to
                     operate or are not properly committed to operating their
                     treatment works. A compounding problem is that much of
                     the O&M information, guidance, and technical assistance
                     currently provided appears to be incorrect, irrelevant, or
                     inadequate. A number of policy options are available at the
                     federal and state levels to address the POTW O&M
                     problems. This paper addresses the role of private sector
                     technical assistance to municipalities in improving POTW

-------
performance. When Agency policy is developed in this area,
the results of the private sector's O&M activities should be
considered.
This study was  undertaken to determine how  many and
what kind of  private firms were  involved in operational
assistance and  what range of services they provide. A
further objective was to identify the minimum qualifications
necessary for these firms to  provide satisfactory O&M
services.  By  soliciting  EPA  regional offices and  the
Municipal Operations Branch staff, inserting a notice in the
April 6,  1979,  issue of the Commerce  Business Daily
requesting qualifications and experience statements, and
directly contacting over 200 consulting engineering firms, a
list of firms providing O&M services was constructed. A
response  form was developed to evaluate each firm that
submitted a response to the request for information.
Before  this study, perceptions of the availability and
effectiveness of  private sector O&M services were largely
shaped by the aggressive marketing of a limited number of
firms.
Results

Types of O&M Activities
Evaluation  of  the responses  revealed that operational
assistance activities vary widely with regard to the type of
service provided, the type of firm providing the service, and
the time involved.

Type of Service Provided
The range of operational services currently offered by the
private sector include
  • Operational evaluation
  • Review of  design for operational  flexibility and
     reliability
  • Planning for staffing and management
  • Operator training
  • Trouble-shooting
  • Process monitoring and optimization
  • Laboratory services
  • Plant start-up services
  • Provision of employees to fill selected key operational
     positions
  • Provision of full  plant operational  staff,  but with
     client retaining management/administrative deci-
     sion-making responsibility
  • Provision  of full plant operational staff, with
     contractor assuming total managerial responsibility.
In contrast to more traditional, less comprehensive, O&M
services, contract operation of POTW's is a relatively recent
phenomenon. This trend, although quite modest in view of
the total number of POTW's, is more widespread than is
commonly  realized. During this study, two dozen plants
currently being  operated by an outside contractor were
encountered.

 Type of Firm Providing Service
The majority of the firms that have provided contract O&M
are traditional engineering firms. In a few cases, wholly
owned  subsidiaries  have  been established or are being
considered to market O&M services. For the most part, new
clients are not sought aggressively; rather, these services
are provided to existing or past design clients. Generally, an
O&M group  is closely affiliated with the  usual design
services of the firm. In other instances, operational services
are being offered by divisions or subsidiaries of wastewater
laboratories and equipment suppliers. Another model is the
comparatively recent development of firms that specialize
in providing only operational services.  Many firms have
considerable  experience in providing operation services
and  contract  operations  of wastewater for  industrial
clients. Alt hough this experience may be transferable to the
public sector, there are significant institutional differences
that  make the contractual  mechanisms more complex.

Length of Involvement
Assistance may vary from telephone consultation provided
free  of charge to an  on-going design client to a multi-year,
multi-million  dollar comprehensive services contract to
operate the POTW.  Most operational assistance activities
involve in-plant  evaluation and training  varying from
several  days to several weeks. With  the exception of
planning, design, and plant start-up related activities, EPA
provides no f i nancial assistance for O&M services although
the Agency strongly encourages their use.

Response Summary
Of the 107 responses received to requests for information
pertaining  to contractor capabilities and experience in
providing O&M services  to POTW's, 95  qualified for
evaluation. The  evaluation  concentrated on contractor
organization,  staff  personnel,  staff experience, staff
licensing,  contractor's O&M services,  documented
experience of contractor, and contractor's interpretation of
the  private sector's role  in POTW O&M. An overall
summary of responses, broken down by EPA region, is
given in Table 1. Of the 95 qualified firms responding, 24
(25 percent) offered full O&M services including contract
operation and maintenance, O&M technical assistance,
and design related O&M services (category Afirms in Table
1). In addition to these 24 firms, 57 of the responding firms
offered O&M technical assistance and design related O&M
services (category B firms). The  remaining 14 respondees
(15 percent) were in design or related fields and exhibited
some interest in O&M (category C firms).

The  majority of the firms responding were consulting
engineering firms with  considerable  design-related
experience in wastewater treatment. These firms  also
provided  many  other  engineering, architectural, and
construction services They had become involved in O&M
services as  a result  of  their design  work  support.
Operational technical  assistance activities were not  a
major portion of their yearly workload. As a result of recent
developments in regulations and enforcement,  however,
many  of the larger firms had established  or were
in the  process of establishing O&M departments within
their organizational structure  to specifically  offer these
types of services. The consultants noted POTW managers
were becoming increasingly aware of rising O&M costs and
the  implications of  noncompliance m meeting  minimum
POTW discharge standards. Consultants also cited recent
research reports defining  the cause and  effect of POTW
O&M problems as motivation to review O&M practices.

In addition to the consulting engineering firms, a number of
equipment manufacturing  firms responded to our request

-------
Table 1 .
Region
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10


Evaluation of 95 Private Sector Firms Offering O&M Services to PC
(States) Respondees
(CT, ME, MA, NH, Rl, VT)
(NJ, NY)
(DE, MD, PA, VA, WV)
(AL, FL, GA, KY, MS, NC, SC, TN)
(IL, IN, Ml, MN, OH, Wl)
(IA, KS, MO, NE)
(AR, LA, NM, OK, TX)
(CO, MT, ND, SD, UT, WY)
(AZ, CA, HI, NV)
(AK, ID, OR, WA)
Totals
Percent Distribution
8
8
15
12
21
6
3
3
14
5
95

)TW's, by EPA Region
Categories*
A
5
0
4
3
5
0
0
1
6
0
24
25%
B
1
7
9
7
13
5
3
2
6
4
57
60%
C
2
1
2
2
3
1
0
0
2
1
14
15%
*0&M Service Categories:
A: Firms offering contract O&M, O&M technical assistance, and design-related O&M services.
B: Firms offering O&M technical assistance, and design-related O&M services.
C: Firm offering only design-related O&M services.
for  information.  Typically, these firms  marketed waste-
water treatment  equipment and, to support their product
lines, had developed complete technical assistance service
programs to ensure proper operation and performance of
their own  equipment. This service concept  eventually
expanded to encompass  the entire plant,  becoming the
most comprehensive contract O&M service  package avail-
able to POTW's.
Since industry has utilized the contract O&M  concept in
petrochemical  processing plants and  power  generating
facilities for years, it was not surprising to receive responses
from firms experienced in  industrial  O&M. These firms
possessed the financial and operations management skills
but lacked the  treatment technology  expertise that is
essential to most biological wastewater treatment systems.

Conclusions

Minimum Qualifications  for Private Sector O&M
Firms
During the execution of this study, some observations were
made concerning the  minimum requirements  that would
serve as a guideline in determining the capabilities of a firm
offering  technical assistance and/or  contract  O&M to
POTW's. Because operating problems differ from  one
treatment  plant to another, the  importance  of these
minimum requirements to the needs of a particular POTW
will vary.
The basic requirements necessary to provide contract O&M
services  to POTW's include, but are not  limited to, the
following. The order of presentation is not  significant.
• Personnel  management, staffing, and scheduling
   capabilities
• Financial management, contracts, legal,  and insurance
   capabilities
• Clerical personnel
• Proficiency in purchasing and inventory
• Proficiency in public and government relations
• Treatment process evaluation capabilities
   - Engineering design
  - Biological considerations
  - Chemical considerations
  - Laboratory experience or capabilities
• Experienced and licensed operations personnel
• Experienced maintenance personnel
• Training program development and implementation
  skills
• Access  to mechanical, electrical, and other consulting
  engineering staff

Outlook
The overall effectiveness of the private sector in providing
operational services to POTW's cannot  be determined
based  on the  information collected to date. Such a
determination would require a much larger effort than was
in the scope of this project. Documentation indicating that
treatment plant reliability and cost effective operation have
been achieved, however, is available from some communi-
ties that have received O&M services.
Some stumbling blocks have slowed  the growth of O&M
servicing. According to our respondees,  questions of
liability and operating insurance are major considerations
in  providing total contract  operations.  Furthermore, the
nature of wastewater treatment and the  O&M  of the
facilities require a diversity in staff expertise, a factor that
favors large firms.ln many cases, the expected profit is not
of sufficient magnitude to attract capable firms, large or
small, to the O&M specialty market.
Cost effective decision-making demands that continued
government expenditures  in the wastewater treatment
area be justifiable.  Indeed, after spending a decade and
considerable sums of money on construction of wastewater
treatment facilities, it  is not unreasonable  to pause and
evaluate the  results of these efforts. Since studies have
clearly indicated that a large number of POTW's are  not
meeting the intended effluent waterquality standards, new
approaches are necessary to  improve water pollution
control program performance. Some shift in emphasis may
occur  from  constructing  new treatment  facilities to
improving the O&M of existing facilities. If such a shift does
                                                                               > US GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1982-559-017/0778

-------
         occur, well qualified private firms capable'of handling O&M
         problems  could become highly sought. At that point, a
         knowledge of what firms are available and an evaluation of
         their competencies would be  useful. The value of this
         limited analysis and of further studies in this area lies in
         their potential  to provide serviceable information of this
         type.
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Center for Environmental Research
Information
Cincinnati OH 45268
Postage and
Fees Paid
Environmental
Protection
Agency
EPA 335
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use S300
           P O   0 U 0 1) 3 c' V
           U  o  t-i'JVJH  Pt
-------