& EPA
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Office of Air Quality
Planning and Standards
Research Triangle Park, Nt 27711
EPA 452/R-92-006
October 1992
Air
STATE
AIR POLLUTION
CONTROL PROGRAMS -
A PROFILE REPORT
-------
STATE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL PROGRAMS
A PROFILE REPORT
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
October 1992
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Region 5, Library (PL-12J)
77 West Jackson Boulevard, 12th Floor
Chicago, IL 60604-3590
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION
II. RESULTS
A. General
B. Enforcement
C. Monitoring
D. Air Toxics
E. Section 105 Funding
III. STATE WORK SHEETS AND CALCULATIONS
IV. COMMENTS
page
1
1
1
2
5
9
10
12
12
LIST OF EXHIBITS
Exhibit 1 Distribution of State Air Program Work-Years by Program 2
Area and State Population Category
Exhibit 2 Total Federally-Reportable Sources by State Population 3
Category
Exhibit 3 Total Federally-Reportable Sources per State Enforcement 3
Work-Year
Exhibit 4 Annual State Inspections per FederaHy-Reportabie Source 4
Exhibit 5 Annual State Inspections per State Enforcement Work-Year 4
Exhibit 6 Enforcement Work-Years Devoted to Citizen Complaints per 5
Thousand Reportable Sources
Exhibit 7 Administrative Orders per Thousand Federally-Reportable 6
Sources
Exhibit 8 Total State NAMS and SLAMS Monitors per Million People 6
Exhibit 9 Total State Special Purpose Monitors per Million People 7
Exhibit 10 Total State NAMS and SLAMS Monitors per Urban Area 8
Exhibit 11 Total State Special Purpose Monitors per Urban Area 8
-------
Exhibit 12 Total State Monitors (NAMS/SLAMS/SPM) per State 9
Monitoring Work-Year
Exhibit 13 Ratio of State Air Toxics Work-Years to 1990 State Population 9
Exhibit 14 Ratio of State Air toxics Work-Years to the State Toxics 10
Release Inventory (TRI)
Exhibit 15 Total Federal Section 105 Funding Divided by 1990 State 11
Population
Exhibit 16 Percent Federal Contribution to Total Section 105 Funding 11
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS
Attachment 1 Summary of Census Data by State Size Category
Attachment 2 State Profile Work Sheet
Attachment 3 Calculations
-------
I. INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this report is to
provide a document which States can
use to compare certain elements of their
air pollution control programs to those of
other States (with some exceptions, sta-
tistics on the activities of local air pollu-
tion control programs are not included in
this report due to a lack of data for these
programs). Such a comparison can
indicate where State resources might be
shifted in order to maximize environmen-
tal results given the total resources that
are available. In addition, this type of
comparison can provide States with evi-
dence that might be used to persuade
their legislators that additional air pro-
gram resources are necessary.
State air pollution control program
areas considered in this report include
enforcement, monitoring, administration,
permitting/new source review, regulatory
planning and development, and control of
air toxics. The data used in this report
are from a variety of sources. Informa-
tion on the amount of work-years devoted
by States to certain program areas is
from a survey done by EPA in 1989.
The results of this survey were published
in a document entitled "Survey of State
and Local Air Pollution Agencies' Activi-
ties and Costs" (EPA-450/2-90-006, Feb-
ruary 1990). This report, hereafter re-
ferred to as the "S/L Survey Report",
compiled statistics on 45 State and 41
local air pollution agencies concerning
their air program activities for their most
recent year of record. For most agen-
cies, the data pertained to either fiscal
year (FY) 1987 or 1988. The other data
used in this report come from a variety of
EPA reports and data bases such as the
Aerometric Information Retrieval System
and the National Air Toxics Information
Clearinghouse.
It is not the intention of this report
to identify individual States. As a result,
no State-specific data, other than the
census information shown in Attachment
1, are included in this document. The
results presented in this report are gener-
ally in the form of charts which present a
minimum, an average, and a maximum
value for various air program activity
indicators for large, medium, and small
States. For the purposes of this report,
large States are defined as those with a
1990 population of over 6 million people.
Medium States are defined as those with
a population between 3 million and 6
million and small States are those with a
population under 3 million. Attachment 1
presents statistics on 1990 State popula-
tion and on the number of urban areas
over 100,000 population for these three
categories of States.
II. RESULTS
A. General
From the S/L Survey Report it was
possible to determine how the respond-
ing States distributed total air program
work-years among their program areas.
Exhibit 1 is a display of this information.
As can be seen from the exhibit, enforce-
ment activities account for the greatest
average number of work-years expended
for all State population size categories.
-------
EXHIBIT 1 I
DISTRIBUTION OF STATE AIR PROGRAM WORK-YEARS I
BY PROGRAM AREA AND STATE POPULATION CATEGORY I
471 » 2»
27
Percent of Total Air Program Work-Years
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
20 20
13
Enforcement Administration SI Pa/Regs Other
Monitoring NSR/Permits Toxics
D
Large
States
Medium
States
Small
States
NunMra scov* 'am rwraMn tn «v«ragi
ptram tor tw proyim are*. On Iran T»
SO. Suv»y fl«p«t
Monitoring and administrative activities
then account for the next highest average
number of work-years, followed by new
source review (NSR)/permitting activities,
State implementation plan (SIP)/regula-
tory development activities, activities
related to control of air toxics, and other
activities.
B. Enforcement
Delegated States must submit to
EPA's Aerometric Information Retrieval
System (AIRS) compliance and enforce-
ment data on large sources subject to
State implementation plans and on sourc-
es regulated under new source perfor-
mance standards or under national emis-
sion standards for hazardous air pollut-
ants. Exhibit 2 displays information on
the number of these federally reportable
stationary sources by State population
size category. This exhibit displays the
average value for the State size category
as well as the range of values for that
category. As would be expected, the
average number of Federally-reportable
stationary sources per State is highest for
large States, followed by medium and
then small States. The ranges of values
vary significantly, however, particularly for
small states. The data used to develop
Exhibit 2 are from AIRS and represent
information in the data base as of Sep-
tember 30, 1991.
Exhibit 3 displays one aspect of
the enforcement workload placed upon
State agencies. This exhibit shows the
ratio of total Federally-reportable sources
to the number of State work-years devot-
ed to enforcement activities for the three
State size categories. Average values
range from 29 sources per enforcement
work-year for medium States to 49 sourc-
es per work-year for small States. All
three State size categories show appre-
ciable variation in the range of values but
small States show the greatest variation
with values that range from 7 to 135
-------
EXHIBIT 2 I
TOTAL FEDERALLY-REPORTABLE SOURCES I
BY STATE POPULATION CATEGORY |
Total Sources
5,000
Large States
Medium States
Small Slates
Minimum
Number
Average
Number
Maximum
Number
Ora from AIRS
sources per work-year. The data used to
develop Exhibit 3 are from AIRS and the
S/L Survey Report.
Exhibit 4 displays another aspect
of State enforcement activities. It snows
the ratio of annual State inspections of
Federally-reportable sources to the total
number of Federally-reportable sources
for each State size category. With the
exception of the minimum ratio for small
States, the values are relatively similar
for each of the State size categories.
The average value only ranges from 0.8
to 0.9 inspections per source and the
EXHIBIT 3
TOTAL FEDERALLY-REPORTABLE SOURCES
PEH STATE ENFORCEMENT WORK-YEAR
Sources per Work-Year
200
150 -
100 -
Large States
Medium States
Small Slates
7"7i Minimum
'LA Hallo
D*ta from AIRS
-------
EXHIBIT 4
ANNUAL STATE INSPECTIONS
PER FEDERALLY-REPORTABLE SOURCE
Inspection* par Source
Large. State*
Medium Stale*
Small State*
Minimum
Ratio
Average
Ratio
Maximum
Ratio
Ma from AIRS.
maximum ratios range from 1.5 to 2.1
inspections per source. The data that
were used to develop Exhibit 4 are from
AIRS.
Exhibit 5 displays an indicator of
the average inspection workload in the
States. It shows the ratio of total annual
State inspections of Federally-reportable
sources to total State work-years devoted
to enforcement activities. (A better indi-
cator would be the ratio of total inspec-
tions to total State inspectors but the
data needed to develop this ratio were
not available.) Average values shown in
Exhibit 5 range from 26 inspections per
EXHIBIT 5 I
ANNUAL STATE INSPECTIONS I
PER STATE ENFORCEMENT WORK-YEAR |
Sources per Work-Year
160
Large State*
Medium State*
Small States
Minimum
Ratio
Average
Ratio
Maximum
Ratio
Data from AIRS and m« an. Sunny fUpoo
-------
enforcement work-year for medium
States to 29 inspections per work-year
for both large and small States. Values
vary widely, however, for all State size
categories. The data used to generate
Exhibit 5 are from AIRS and the S/L
Survey Report.
Exhibit 6 shows the ratio of State
enforcement work-years devoted to citi-
zen complaint investigations per thou-
sand Federally-reportabie State sources.
Exhibit 7 provides information on
the number of total administrative orders
per thousand major stationary sources for
the various State size categories. Based
on the average values for each State
size category, it appears that large States
utilize administrative orders more than do
medium or small States. Medium and
small States utilize administrative orders
about half as frequently on the average
as do large States. The data used for
Exhibit 7 are from AIRS.
EXHIBITS
ENFORCEMENT WORK-YEARS DEVOTED TO CITIZEN
COMPLAINTS PER THOUSAND HEPORTABLE SOURCES
k-Years per 1000 Source*
Large States
Medium State*
Small Stale
Minimum
Ratio
Average
Ratio
Maximum
Ratio
0*1* from AIRS and m« art Surwy ftoport
Average values are nearly identical for
the various State size categories (3-4
work-years per thousand sources) but the
range of values vary widely. The'data
used for Exhibit 6 are from AIRS and the
S/L Survey Report. Relatively few States
provided data in this area for the S/L
Survey Report and, as a result, there are
fewer States in each size category to
base averages upon than for most of the
other exhibits.
C. Monitoring
Exhibit 8 displays one aspect of
State air quality monitoring activities. It
shows the ratio of total monitors for the
National Air Monitoring Stations (NAMS)
and the State and Local Air Monitoring
Stations (SLAMS) to total State popula-
tion. As can be seen from the exhibit,
the average number of NAMS and
-------
EXHIBIT 7
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS PER THOUSAND
FEOERAU.Y-REPORTABLE SOURCES
Administrative Orders per Thousand Sources
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
14S
Large States
Medium States
Small States
Minimum
Ratio
Average
Ratio
Maximum
Ratio
DM (ram AIRS.
SLAMS monitors per million people in-
creases as the average State size de-
creases, with the average ratio going
from 7 NAMS and SLAMS monitors per
million people for large States to 12 for
medium States and 17 for small States.
The data used for Exhibit 8 are from
AIRS and include all monitors operated
by both State and local agencies as of
December 31, 1990.
Exhibit 9 displays another aspect
of State monitoring activities. It shows
the ratio of State special purpose moni-
tors (SPM) to total State population. As
EXHIBIT 3 1
TOTAL STATE NAMS AND SLAMS MONITORS I
PER MILLION PEOPLE I
i per Million People
Large Slates
Medium States
Small States
Minimum
Ratio
Average
Ratio
Maximum
Ratio
Omtm from AIRS
-------
EXHIBIT 9
TOTAL STATE SPECIAL PURPOSE MONITORS
PER MILLION PEOPLE
Monitors par Million People
Large States
Medium States
Small States
Minimum
Ratio
Average
Ratio
Maxim im
Ratio
Data from AIRS
was the case with Exhibit 8, the average
number of monitors per million people
increases as State size decreases. A
comparison of Exhibit 9 and Exhibit 8
shows that, on the average, States have
significantly more NAMS and SLAMS
monitors per million people as they have
special purpose monitors (a total of 7
NAMS/SLAMS monitors per million peo-
ple versus 1 special purpose monitor for
large States, 12 NAMS/SLAMS monitors
versus 3 special purpose monitors for
medium States, and 17 NAMS/SLAMS
monitors versus 6 special purpose moni-
tors for small States). As was the case
for Exhibit 8, the data used for Exhibit 9
are from AIRS and include State and
local agency special purpose monitors
operating as of December 31, 1990.
in Exhibit 8, the average ratio of monitors
per urban area is the highest for small
States. The monitoring data used for
Exhibit 10 are from AIRS and the popula-
tion data are from Attachment 1.
Exhibit 11 shows the ratio of total
special purpose monitors to total urban
areas over 100,000 population. As can
be seen from the exhibit, the average
ratios for the three State size categories
are not too different in absolute value.
The range between the minimum ratio
and maximum ratio for small States is
significantly wider than the ranges for
large and medium States. The data used
for Exhibit 11 are from AIRS and from
Attachment 1.
Exhibit 10 shows the ratio of total
State NAMS and SLAMS monitors to the
number of urban areas over 100,000
population in the State. Similar to the
ratio of monitors to population presented
Exhibit 12 compares the total
number of State NAMS, SLAMS, and
special purpose monitors to the total
number of work-years devoted by the
State to monitoring activities, as reported
-------
EXHIBIT 10
TOTAL STATE NAMS AND SLAMS MONITORS
PER URBAN AREA
Monitor* per Urban Area
Large States
Medium States
Small States
Minimum
Ratio
Average
Ratio
Maximum
Ratio
0»tt from AIRS
in the S/L Survey Report. The average
ratio of total monitors to total work-years
is nearly identical for all three State size
categories. As is the case with many of
the other ratios presented in this report,
the range of values is wider for small
States than for large and medium States.
The data used for Exhibit 12 are from
AIRS and the S/L Survey Report. Like
the monitoring data used in Exhibits 8-11,
only State-operated monitors are includ-
ed in Exhibit 12. Monitors operated by
local agencies are not included since
information on monitoring work-years at
the local level are not available.
EXHIBIT 11
TOTAL STATE SPECIAL PURPOSE MONITORS
PER URBAN AREA
i per Urban Area
Large Slate*
Medium States
Small States
Minimum
Ratio
Average
Ratio
Maximim
RAtlo
Qua Iran AIRS
3
-------
EXHIBIT 12
TOTAL STATE MONITORS (NAMS/SLAMS/SPM) |
PER STATE MONITORING WORK-YEAR
State Monitors per Work-Ye
25
20
15
10
5
0
Large Slate*
Medium States
Small States
Minimum
Ratio
Average
Ratio
Maximlm
Ratio
Oatt from AIRS and *« SO. Sunny fUport.
D. Air Toxics
Exhibit 13 relates State agency
work-years devoted to control of air tox-
ics to 1990 State population for the vari-
ous State size categories. As can be
seen from the exhibit, the average num-
ber of work-years per million people does
not vary significantly with average State
size. Unlike many of the other exhibits in
this report, the widest range of values is
the range for the medium State size
category. Average values and ranges for
large and small States are fairly similar.
The work-year data used for Exhibit 13
EXHIBIT 13
RATIO OF STATE AIR TOXICS WORK-YEARS
TO 1990 STATE POPULATION
Work-Years per Million People
Large States
Medium Slates
Small States
Minimum
Ratio
Average
Ratio
Maximum
Ratio
WwX-yw information tarn SA. Sunny fl«ooft
PopUaoon data from Anacmunt 1
-------
are from the S/L Survey Report and the
population data are from Attachment 1 of
this report.
Exhibit 14 relates State agency
work-years allocated to control of air
toxics to the State toxics release invento-
ry. The average ratio ranges from 0.11
work-years per million pounds in the
State toxics release inventory for large
States to 0.08 work-years per million
pounds for medium States to 0.06 work-
dollars per person basis, with the 1990
State population being the basis for the
ratio. Only the Federal portion of the
total Section 105 funding is displayed
and includes those Federal Section 105
funds contributed in FY 1990 to State
and directly-funded local air pollution
control agencies and to Indian tribes.
Contributions made by State and local
agencies and Indian tribes to match the
Federal Section 105 contributions are not
included. As can be seen from the ex-
hibit, average Federal Section 105 fund-
EXHIBIT 14 |
RATIO OF STATE AIR TOXICS WORK-YEARS 1
TO THE STATE TOXICS RELEASE INVENTORY (TRI) |
Work-Years per Million Pounds TRI
3.M
0.6«
o.s
Large Slates
Medium Stales
Small States
Minimum
Ratio
Average
RAtio
Maximim
RAtio
WonX-ycw information mm MSA. Sumy fl*port
Tones mvwnory information from ti* Tana
RtluM Invwtmry Sfstom.
years per million pounds for small States.
The data for Exhibit 14 are from the S/L
Survey Report and EPA's Toxics Release
Inventory System.
E. Section 105 Funding
Exhibit 15 displays information on
Clean Air Act Section 105 funding for the
various State size categories. The at-
tachment displays this information on a
ing increases as the average State size
category decreases. For large States,
average Federal funding is $0.33 per
person compared to $0.41 for medium
States and $0.54 for small States. The
data used for Exhibit 15 are from a pre-
liminary internal EPA summary of FY
1990 Section 105 grant funding.
Exhibit 16 shows the percentage
of the Federal contribution to total Sec-
-------
EXHiamsI
TOTAL FEDERAL SECTION 105 FUNDING I
DIVIDED BY 1990 STATE POPULATION |
Large State*
Medium State*
Small State*
Minimum
Amount
Average
Amount
Maximum
Amount
Souret: pmlnrinory Intern* EPA wmnwry at
FT 19M Stolen 10* fundno.
tion 105 funding for the various State
size categories. Total funding includes
the Federal contribution plus the match-
ing contribution made by States, directly-
funded local agencies, and Indian tribes.
As can be seen from the exhibit, the
average Federal contribution for large
States is 18 percent, 34 percent for medi-
um States, and 40 percent for small
States. As was the case for Exhibit 15,
the data used for Exhibit 16 are prelimi-
nary FY 1990 data.
EXHIBIT 18
PERCENT FEDERAL CONTRIBUTION
TO TOTAL SECTION 105 FUNDING
Fedora! P«rcant of Total Section 105 Funding
100
Large State*
Medium State*
Small States
Minimum
Ratio
Average
Ratio
Maximum
Ratio
FY 1900 S«aion 1M funding Information.
TotK funding Include* F«4«ral contribution plui
ma mMoMno. contribution*.
11
-------
III. STATE WORK SHEETS AND CAL-
CULATIONS
Attachment 2 is a work sheet that
can be used by States that want to calcu-
late ratios for their States to compare to
the results presented in this report. All of
the ratios presented in this report can be
calculated once Attachment 2 has been
completed. Attachment 3 is a calculation
sheet that will generate ratios for individ-
ual States that can then be compared to
the ratios presented in this report.
IV. COMMENTS
The average values presented in
this report are not intended to represent
ideal or target values for the various
State air program areas. The develop-
ment of such values is beyond the scope
of this report. The information presented
in this report has a high degree of vari-
ability, particularly with regard to small
States, and in some cases the data are
several years old and may not be repre-
sentative of current State air pollution
control program operations. Because of
this, care should be taken when using
the information presented here.
-------
ATTACHMENT 1
SUMMARY OF CENSUS DATA
BY STATE SIZE CATEGORY
State
1990 State
Population
(thousands)
Number of Areas
Greater Than
100,000 Population
f'fr'-
;\,\ -,\ N " " '
: ;;>- , **** Large Slates (over 6'nilFa^populatlbn) ****
'•>'-•• " ;
: ^ , , '•
California
Florida
Georgia
Illinois
Massachusetts
Michigan
New Jersey
New York
North Carolina
Ohio
Pennsylvania
Texas
Virginia
29,760
12,938
6,478
11,431
6,016
9,295
7,730
17,990
6,629
10,847
1 1 ,882
16,987
6,187
21
17
6
11
9
10
6
10
11
11
11
19
5
?l?iSIK
Alabama
An'zona
Colorado
Connecticut
Indiana
Kentucky
4,041
3,665
3,294
3,287
5,544
3,685
6
2
4
11
7
5
Louisiana
4,220
-------
ATTACHMENT 1
SUMMARY OF CENSUS DATA
BY STATE SIZE CATEGORY
State
Maryland
Minnesota
Missouri
Oklahoma
Puerto Rico
South Carolina
Tennessee
Washington
Wisconsin
1990 State
Population
(thousands)
4,781
4,375
5,117
3,146
3,291
3,487
4,877
4,867
4,892
Number of Areas
Greater Than
100,000 Population
3
3
3
2
5
5
4
6
7
: **** Small States (less than 3 rniiKon population} ****•
Alaska
American Samoa
Arkansas
Delaware
Guam
Hawaii
Idaho
Iowa
Kansas
Maine
Mississippi
Montana
Nebraska
550
40
2,351
666
133
1,108
1,007
2,777
2,478
1,228
2,573
799
1,573
1
0
2
1
0
2
1
5
3
2
3
0
2
-------
ATTACHMENT 1
SUMMARY OF CENSUS DATA
BY STATE SIZE CATEGORY
State
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Mexico
No. Mariana Islands
North Dakota
Oregon
Rhode Island
South Dakota
Utah
Vermont
Virgin Islands
Washington D.C.
West Virginia
Wyoming
1990 State
Population
(thousands)
1,202
1,109
1,515
21
.639
2,842
1,003
696
1,723
563
103
607
1,793
455
Number of Areas
Greater Than
100,000 Population
2
4
2
0
1
3
2
1
3
0
0
1
2
0
Note: Urban areas greater than 100,000 population that are included in more
than one State are counted more than once in the table above. For
example, the New York urban area is counted once for New York and
once again for New Jersey.
-------
ATTACHMENT 2
STATE PROFILE WORK SHEET
STATE:
Line
1a
1b
2a
2b
2c
2d
2e
2f
2g
2h
3
4
5
6
7a
7b
7c
7d
7e
3
Description
State Population (thousands)
Number of Urban Areas
Total State Work-years - Enforcement
Total State Work-years - Monitoring
Total State Work-years - Administration
Total State Work-years - NSR/Permits
Total State Work-years - SIPs/Reguiations
Total State Work-years - Air Toxics Control
Total State Work-years - Other
Sum of lines 2a through 2g
Number of federally-reportable stationary
sources
Annual number of federally-reportabie
inspections
State work-years spent on citizen complaints
Annual number of federally-reportable
administrative orders
Total NAMS Monitors
Total SLAMS Monitors
Total Special Purpose Monitors
Sum of lines 7a and 7b
Sum of lines 7c and 7d
State Toxics Release Inventory
Note
1
1
2
2
3
2
2
2
4
5
6
6
7
6
8
8,9
8
10
Value
i
-------
ATTACHMENT 2
STATE PROFILE WORK SHEET
STATE:
Line
9a
9b
9c
Description
Federal Section 105 Funding - current year
Non-Federal Section 105 Funding - current
year
Sum of lines 9a and 9b
Note
11
12
Value
Notes
1 -
2-
3-
See Attachment 1.
Do not include indirect work-years. Include indirect work-years on line 2c.
Includes indirect work-years along with other administrative work-years
for staff training, public information, budget/grant activities, support to
advisory commissions or boards, and policy development.
4 - Include all work-years not included on lines 2a-2g.
5 - Total on line 2h should equal the total State air program work-years.
6 - As reported to EPA's AIRS Facility Subsystem (AIRS/AFS).
7 - Do not include indirect work-years.
8 - As reported to the AIRS Air Quality Subsystem (AIRS/AQS). Includes only
State-operated monitors.
9 - Excludes NAMS monitors.
10 - Millions of pounds of air releases.
11 - In thousands of dollars. Includes Federal funds for directly-funded locals
and Indian tribes as well as in support of State agency.
12 - In thousands of dollars. Includes matching Section 105 funds
contributed by States and directly-funded locals and Indian tribes.
-------
ATTACHMENT 3 - CALCULATIONS
STATE:
Category
Calculated
Value
Average Value
for Similar-
Sized States
Range of
Values for
Similar-Sized
States
A. Percent Work-Year (WY) Distribution
1. Enforcement percent of total
(100 x Attachment 2 line 2a
divided by Attachment 2 line 2h)
(refer to
Exhibit 1)
NA
2. Monitoring percent of total (100 x
line 2b divided by line 2h)
(refer to
Exhibit 1)
NA
3. Administration percent of total (100
x line 2c divided by line 2h)
(refer to
Exhibit 1)
NA
4. NSR/Permitting percent of total
(100 x line 2d divided by line 2h)
(refer to
Exhibit 1)
NA
5. SIPs/Reg Development percent of
total (100 x line 2e divided by line
2h)
(refer to
Exhibit 1)
NA
6. Air Toxics percent of total (100 x
line 2f divided by line 2h)
(refer to
Exhibit 1)
NA
7. Other percent of total (100 x line
2g divided by line 2h)
(refer to
Exhibit 1)
NA
B. Total Federally-reportable Sources
(line 3)
(refer to
Exhibit 2)
(refer to
Exhibit 2}
C. Stationary Sources per Enforcement
WY (line 3 divided by line 2a)
(refer to
Exhibit 3)
(refer to
Exhibit 3)
D. Ratio of Total Inspections to Total
Sources (line 4 divided by line 3)
(refer to
Exhibit 4)
(refer to
Exhibit 4)
-------
ATTACHMENT 3 - CALCULATIONS
STATE:
Category
E. Total Inspections per Enforcement
WY (line 4 divided by line 2a)
F. WY Spent on Citizen Complaints per
Thousand Sources (1 000 x line 5
divided by line 3)
G. Administrative Orders per Thousand
Sources (1 000 x line 6 divided by
line 3)
H. Total NAMS and SU\MS Monitors
per Million People (1000 x line 7d
divided by line 1a)
I. Total Special Purpose Monitors per
Million People (1000 x line 7c divided
by line 1a)
J. Total NAMS and SLAMS Monitors
per Urban Area (line 7d divided by
line 1b)
K. Total Special Purpose Monitors per
Urban Area (line 7c divided by line
1b)
L. Ratio of Total Monitors per
Monitoring WY (line 7e divided by line
2b)
M. Air Toxics WY per Million People
(1000 x line 2f divided by line la)
Calculated
Value
Average Value
for Similar-
Sized States
(refer to
Exhibit 5)
(refer to
Exhibit 6)
(refer to
Exhibit 7)
(refer to
Exhibit 8)
(refer to
Exhibit 9)
(refer to
Exhibit 10)
(refer to
Exhibit 1 1 )
(refer to
Exhibit 12)
(refer to
Exhibit 13)
Range of
Values for
Similar-Sized
States
(refer to
Exhibit 5)
(refer to
Exhibit 6)
(refer to
Exhibit 7)
(refer to
Exhibit 8)
(refer to
Exhibit 9)
(refer to
Exhibit 10)
(refer to
Exhibit 1 1 )
(refer to
Exhibit 12)
(refer to
Exhibit 13)
-------
ATTACHMENT 3 - CALCULATIONS
STATE:
Category
N. Air Toxics WY per Million Pounds
Toxics Release Inventory (line 2f
divided by line 8)
O. Ratio of Federal Section 1 05
Funding to State Population
($/person) (line 9a divided by line 1a)
P. Percent Federal Contribution to Total
Section 105 Funding (100 x line 9a
divided by line 9c)
Calculated
Value
Average Value
for Similar-
Sized States
(refer to
Exhibit 14)
(refer to
Exhibit 1 5)
(refer to
Exhibit 16)
Range of
Values for
Similar-Sized
States
(refer to
Exhibit 14)
(refer to
Exhibit 15)
(refer to
Exhibit 16)
-------
United States Office of Air and Radf< ., i
Environmental Protection Office of Air Quality Running and Standards
Agency Research Triangle Park NC 27711
Official Business Publication No. EPA 452/R-92-006
Penalty for Private Use
$300
If your address is Incorrect please change on the above label, tear off
and return to the above address.
If you do not desire to continue receiving this technical report series,
CHECK HERB tear off label and return to the above address.
------- |