United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Office of Air Quality
Planning and Standards
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
EPA - 454/R-00-023a
April 2000
Air
&EPA
Hot Mix Asphalt Plants
Kiln Dryer Stack
Manual Methods Testing
Asphalt Plant B
Gary, North Carolina
Volume 1 of 2
-------
FINAL REPORT
EMISSIONS TEST AT AN ASPHALT CONCRETE PRODUCTION PLANT:
ASPHALT PLANT "B" - CARY, NORTH CAROLINA
VOLUME I OF II
REPORT TEXT
APPENDIX A
APPENDIX B
EPA Contract No. 68D70069
Work Assignment No. 2-09
Prepared for:
Mr. Michael L. Toney (MD-19)
Work Assignment Manager
SCGA, EMC, OAQPS
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
September 1999
p \i529\finrpt\"B"\mm08119A.wpd
Submitted by
PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
5001 S. Miami Blvd., Suite 300
Post Office Box 12077
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-2077
(919)941-0333
FAX (919) 941-0234
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Region 5, Library (PL-12J)
-------
DISCLAIMER
This document was prepared by Pacific Environmental Services, Inc. (PES) under EPA
Contract No. 68D70069, Work Assignment No. 2-09. This document has been reviewed
following PES' internal quality assurance procedures and has been approved for distribution.
The contents of this document do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the ILS. EPA.
Mention of trade names does not constitute endorsement by the EPA or PES.
11
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
VOLUME I Eage
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1-1
2.0 SUMMARY OF RESULTS 2-1
2.1 OXYGEN AND CARBON DIOXIDE MEASUREMENTS 2-1
2.2 PCDDs/PCDFs MEASUREMENTS 2-1
2.2.1 Baghouse Inlet - Asphalt Production with RAP 2-5
2.2.2 Baghouse Outlet- Asphalt Production with RAP 2-9
2.2.3 Baghouse Inlet - Asphalt Production without RAP 2-13
2.2.4 Baghouse Outlet - Asphalt Production without RAP 2-17
2.3 PARTICULATE MATTER AND METALS MEASUREMENTS 2-17
2.3.1 Baghouse Inlet - Asphalt Production with RAP 2-17
2.3.2 Baghouse Outlet- Asphalt Production with RAP 2-25
2.3.3 Baghouse Inlet - Asphalt Production without RAP 2-25
2.3.4 Baghouse Outlet - Asphalt Production without RAP 2-34
2.4 DETERMINATION OF VISIBLE EMISSIONS 2-34
3.0 PROCESS DESCRIPTION 3-1
4.0 SAMPLING LOCATIONS 4-1
4.1 BAGHOUSE INLET SAMPLING LOCATION 4-1
4.2 BAGHOUSE OUTLET SAMPLING LOCATION 4-1
5.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PROCEDURES 5-1
5.1 LOCATION OF MEASUREMENT SITES AND
SAMPLE/VELOCITY TRAVERSE POINTS 5-1
5.2 DETERMINATION OF STACK GAS VOLUMETRIC
FLOW RATE 5-1
5.3 DETERMINATION OF DRY MOLECULAR WEIGHT
AND EMISSION CORRECTION FACTORS 5-1
5.4 DETERMINATION STACK GAS MOISTURE CONTENT 5-2
in
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
VOLUME I Page
5.5 DETERMINATION OF POLYCHLORINATED DIBENZO-P-DIOXINS
AND POLYCHLORINATED DIBENZOFURANS 5-2
5.6 DETERMINATION OF PARTICIPATE MATTER AND METALS 5-4
5.7 DETERMINATION OF PLUME OPACITY 5-8
6.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL PROCEDURES
AND RESULTS 6-1
6.1 CALIBRATION OF APPARATUS 6-1
6.1.1 Barometers 6-1
6.1.2 Temperature Sensors 6-1
6.1.3 Pitot Tubes 6-1
6.1.4 Differential Pressure Gauges 6-3
6.1.5 Dry Gas Meter and Orifice 6-3
6.2 ON-SITE MEASUREMENTS 6-3
6.2.1 Measurement Sites 6-3
6.2.2 Velocity Measurements 6-5
6.2.3 Flue Gas Sampling 6-5
6.2.4 Moisture 6-5
6.2.5 Method 23/Method 29 6-6
6.3 ANALYSES 6-6
6.3.1 Method 23 Analyses 6-6
6.3.2 Method 29 Analyses 6-9
APPENDIX A PROCESS DATA
APPENDIX B RAW FIELD DATA
Appendix B.I Raw Field Data Baghouse Inlet
Appendix B.2 Raw Field Data Baghouse Outlet
IV
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Concluded)
VOLUME II
APPENDIX C ANALYTICAL DATA
Appendix C. 1 Analytical Data Method 5 Participate Matter
Appendix C.2 Analytical Data Method 23 PCDDs/PCDFs
Appendix C.3 Analytical Data Method 29 Multiple Metals
APPENDIX D COMPUTER SUMMARIES
Appendix D.I Computer Summaries Baghouse Inlet Method 23 & 29
Appendix D.2 Computer Summaries Baghouse Outlet Method 9, 23 & 29
APPENDIX E QA/QC DATA AND CERTIFICATIONS
APPENDIX F FIELD TESTING PARTICIPANTS
-------
LIST OF TABLES
VOLUME I Page
TABLE 2.1 EMISSIONS SAMPLING TEST LOG
ASPHALT PLANT "B" - GARY, NC 2-3
TABLE 2.2 PCDDs/PCDFs EMISSIONS SAMPLING AND EXHAUST GAS
PARAMETERS
ROTARY DRUM DRYER - BAGHOUSE INLET
ASPHALT PRODUCTION WITH RAP
ASPHALT PLANT "B"- GARY, NC 2-6
TABLE 2.3 PCDDs/PCDFs CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES
ROTARY DRUM DRYER - BAGHOUSE INLET
ASPHALT PRODUCTION WITH RAP
ASPHALT PLANT "B"- GARY, NC 2-7
TABLE 2.4 PCDDs/PCDFs CONCENTRATIONS AND 2378 TOXIC EQUIVALENT
CONCENTRATIONS ADJUSTED TO 7 PERCENT OXYGEN
ROTARY DRUM DRYER - BAGHOUSE INLET
ASPHALT PRODUCTION WITH RAP
ASPHALT PLANT "B"- GARY, NC 2-8
TABLE 2.5 PCDDs/PCDFs EMISSIONS SAMPLING AND STACK GAS
PARAMETERS
ROTARY DRUM DRYER - BAGHOUSE OUTLET
ASPHALT PRODUCTION WITH RAP
ASPHALT PLANT "B"- GARY, NC 2-10
TABLE 2.6 PCDDs/PCDFs CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES
ROTARY DRUM DRYER - BAGHOUSE OUTLET
ASPHALT PRODUCTION WITH RAP
ASPHALT PLANT "B"- GARY, NC 2-11
VI
-------
LIST OF TABLES (Continued)
VOLUME I Page
TABLE 2.7 PCDDs/PCDFs STACK GAS CONCENTRATIONS AND 2378 TOXIC
EQUIVALENT STACK
GAS CONCENTRATIONS ADJUSTED TO 7 PERCENT OXYGEN
ROTARY DRUM DRYER - BAGHOUSE OUTLET
ASPHALT PRODUCTION WITH RAP
ASPHALT PLANT "B"- GARY, NC 2-12
TABLE 2.8 PCDDs/PCDFs EMISSIONS SAMPLING AND STACK GAS
PARAMETERS
ROTARY DRUM DRYER - BAGHOUSE INLET
ASPHALT PRODUCTION WITHOUT RAP
ASPHALT PLANT "B"- GARY, NC 2-14
TABLE 2.9 PCDDs/PCDFs CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES
ROTARY DRUM DRYER - BAGHOUSE INLET
ASPHALT PRODUCTION WITHOUT RAP
ASPHALT PLANT "B"- GARY, NC 2-15
TABLE 2.10 PCDDs/PCDFs CONCENTRATIONS AND 2378 TOXIC EQUIVALENT
STACK
GAS CONCENTRATIONS ADJUSTED TO 7 PERCENT OXYGEN
ROTARY DRUM DRYER - BAGHOUSE INLET
ASPHALT CONCRETE PRODUCTION WITHOUT RAP
ASPHALT PLANT "B" - GARY, NC 2-16
TABLE 2.11 PCDDs/PCDFs EMISSIONS SAMPLING AND STACK GAS
PARAMETERS
ROTARY DRUM DRYER - BAGHOUSE OUTLET
ASPHALT PRODUCTION WITHOUT RAP
ASPHALT PLANT "B"- GARY, NC 2-18
TABLE 2.12 PCDDs/PCDFs CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES
ROTARY DRUM DRYER - BAGHOUSE OUTLET
ASPHALT PRODUCTION WITHOUT RAP
ASPHALT PLANT "B"- GARY, NC 2-19
VI1
-------
LIST OF TABLES (Continued)
VOLUME I Page
TABLE 2.13 PCDDs/PCDFs CONCENTRATIONS AND 2378 TOXIC EQUIVALENT
CONCENTRATIONS ADJUSTED TO 7 PERCENT OXYGEN
ROTARY DRUM DRYER - BAGHOUSE OUTLET
ASPHALT CONCRETE PRODUCTION WITHOUT RAP
ASPHALT PLANT "B"- GARY, NC 2-20
TABLE 2.14 PARTICULATE/METALS EMISSIONS SAMPLING
AND INLET GAS PARAMETERS
ROTARY DRUM DRYER - BAGHOUSE INLET
ASPHALT PRODUCTION WITH RAP
ASPHALT PLANT "B"- GARY, NC 2-21
TABLE 2.15 PARTICULATE MATTER CONCENTRATIONS AND
EMISSION RATES
ROTARY DRUM DRYER - BAGHOUSE INLET
ASPHALT PRODUCTION WITH RAP
ASPHALT PLANT "B"-GARY, NC 2-22
TABLE 2.16 METALS CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES
ROTARY DRUM DRYER - BAGHOUSE INLET
ASPHALT PRODUCTION WITH RAP
ASPHALT PLANT "B"- GARY, NC 2-23
TABLE 2.17 PARTICULATE/METALS EMISSIONS SAMPLING AND
STACK GAS PARAMETERS
ROTARY DRUM DRYER - BAGHOUSE OUTLET
ASPHALT PRODUCTION WITH RAP
ASPHALT PLANT "B"- GARY, NC 2-26
TABLE 2.18 PARTICULATE MATTER CONCENTRATIONS AND
EMISSION RATES
ROTARY DRUM DRYER - BAGHOUSE OUTLET
ASPHALT PRODUCTION WITH RAP
ASPHALT PLANT "B"- GARY, NC 2-27
TABLE 2.19 METALS CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES
ROTARY DRUM DRYER - BAGHOUSE OUTLET
ASPHALT PRODUCTION WITH RAP
ASPHALT PLANT "B"- GARY, NC 2-28
viii
-------
LIST OF TABLES (Continued)
VOLUME I Page
TABLE 2.20 PARTICULATE/METALS EMISSIONS SAMPLING AND
STACK GAS PARAMETERS
ROTARY DRUM DRYER - BAGHOUSE INLET
ASPHALT PRODUCTION WITHOUT RAP
ASPHALT PLANT "B"- GARY, NC 2-30
TABLE 2.21 PARTICULATE MATTER CONCENTRATIONS AND
EMISSION RATES
ROTARY DRUM DRYER - BAGHOUSE INLET
ASPHALT PRODUCTION WITHOUT RAP
ASPHALT PLANT "B"- GARY, NC 2-31
TABLE 2.22 METALS CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES
ROTARY DRUM DRYER-BAGHOUSE INLET
ASPHALT PRODUCTION WITHOUT RAP
ASPHALT PLANT "B"- GARY, NC 2-32
TABLE 2.23 PARTICULATE/METALS EMISSIONS SAMPLING
AND STACK GAS PARAMETERS
ROTARY DRUM DRYER - BAGHOUSE OUTLET
ASPHALT PRODUCTION WITHOUT RAP
ASPHALT PLANT "B"- GARY, NC 2-35
TABLE 2.24 PARTICULATE MATTER CONCENTRATIONS AND
EMISSION RATES
ROTARY DRUM DRYER - BAGHOUSE OUTLET
ASPHALT PRODUCTION WITHOUT RAP
ASPHALT PLANT "B"- GARY, NC 2-36
TABLE 2.25 METALS CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES
ROTARY DRUM DRYER-BAGHOUSE OUTLET
ASPHALT PRODUCTION WITHOUT RAP
ASPHALT PLANT "B"- GARY, NC 2-37
IX
-------
LIST OF TABLES (Continued)
VOLUME I Page
TABLE 3.1 PLANT OPERATING CONDITIONS
ASPHALT PLANT "B" - GARY, NC 3-3
TABLE 3.2 ASPHALT MIX SPECIFICATIONS
ASPHALT PLANT "B"- GARY, NC 3-5
TABLE 3.3 FUEL SPECIFICATIONS
ASPHALT PLANT "B"-GARY, NC 3-5
TABLE 3.4 SPECIFICS OF PLANT OPERATION
ASPHALT PLANT "B" - GARY, NC 3-6
TABLE 5.1 SAMPLING LOCATIONS, TEST PARAMETERS AND
TEST METHODS SUMMARY
ASPHALT PLANT "B"-CARY,NC 5-2
TABLE 6.1 SUMMARY OF TEMPERATURE SENSOR CALIBRATION DATA
ASPHALT PLANT "B" - GARY, NC 6-2
TABLE 6.2 SUMMARY OF PITOT TUBE DIMENSIONAL DATA
ASPHALT PLANT "B" - GARY, NC 6-4
TABLE 6.3 SUMMARY OF DRY GAS METER AND ORIFICE
CALIBRATION DATA
ASPHALT PLANT "B" - CARY,NC 6-5
TABLE 6.4 SUMMARY OF METHOD 237 METHOD 29 FIELD SAMPLING
QA/QC DATA
ASPHALT PLANT "B" - GARY, NC 6-7
TABLE 6.5 SUMMARY OF METHOD 23 STANDARDS RECOVERY
EFFICIENCIES
ASPHALT PLANT "B" - GARY, NC 6-8
TABLE 6.6 SUMMARY OF METHOD 29 ANALYSIS QC DATA
LAB CONTROL SPIKES
ASPHALT PLANT "B" - GARY, NC 6-11
-------
LIST OF TABLES (Continued)
VOLUME I
TABLE 6.7 SUMMARY OF METHOD 29 ANALYSIS QC DATA
POST DIGESTION MATPJX SPIKES RUN NO. R-M29-O-1
ASPHALT PLANT "B"- GARY, NC ............................... 6-12
TABLE 6.8 METHOD 29 SERIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS QC DATA
RUNNOR-M29-O-1
ASPHALT PLANT "B" - GARY, NC ............................... 6-13
TABLE 6.9 METHOD 29 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS QC DATA
RUN NO. R-M29-O-2
ASPHALT PLANT "B" - GARY, NC ............................... 6-14
TABLE 6.10 METHOD 29 METHOD BLANK ANALYSIS QC DATA
ASPHALT PLANT "B" - CARY,NC ............................... 6-15
TABLE 6.11 METHOD 29 FIELD AND REAGENT BLANK ANALYSIS
QC DATA
ASPHALT PLANT "B" - GARY, NC ............................... 6-16
TABLE 6.12 METHOD 29 MERCURY SPIKE ANALYSIS QC DATA
ASPHALT PLANT "B" - GARY, NC ............................... 6-17
TABLE 6.13 METHOD 29 MERCURY FIELD BLANK ANALYSIS QC DATA
ASPHALT PLANT "B" - GARY, NC ............................... 6-18
XI
-------
LIST OF FIGURES
VOLUME I Page
Figure 1.1 Key Personnel and Responsibility for Testing - Asphalt Plant "B", Gary, NC . 1-3
Figure 1.2 Sampling Locations - Asphalt Plant "B", Gary, NC 1-4
Figure 4.1 Baghouse Inlet Sampling Location - Asphalt Plant "B", Gary, NC 4-2
Figure 4.2 Baghouse Inlet Point Locations - Asphalt Plant "B", Gary, NC 4-3
Figure 4.3 Baghouse Outlet Sampling Location - Asphalt Plant "B", Gary, NC 4-4
Figure 4.4 Baghouse Outlet Point Locations - Asphalt Plant "B", Gary, NC 4-5
Figure 5.1 Method 23 Sample Train Schematic - Asphalt Plant "B" Gary, NC 5-3
Figure 5.2 Method 29 Sample Train Schematic - Asphalt Plant "B", Gary, NC 5-5
Figure 5.3 Method 29 Sample Recovery Scheme (Sample Fractions 1-4)
Asphalt Plant "B", Gary, NC 5-6
Figure 5.4 Method 29 Sample Recovery Scheme (Sample Fraction 5)
Asphalt Plant "B", Gary, NC 5-7
xn
-------
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) is investigating the asphalt
concrete production source category to identify and quantify emissions of hazardous air
pollutants (HAPs) from rotary aggregate dryers used at these facilities. There are two types of
rotary drum dryers in use at asphalt concrete production plants: parallel flow, wherein the
direction of travel of the drying aggregate is the same as the direction of travel of the burner
exhaust gases, and counter flow, wherein the aggregate and exhaust gas flows are opposite to
each other. On May 7, 1997, a work assignment was issued by EPA's Office of Air Quality
Planning and Standards, Emissions Measurement Center, (OAQPS, EMC) to Pacific
Environmental Services, Inc. (PES), of Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. The work
assignment specified that emissions testing for HAPs be conducted on one of each type of
aggregate dryer. Two candidate facilities were therefore identified and selected by EPA as host
facilities for the testing program.
This document describes the test procedures, results, and quality assurance procedures
that were employed during the testing of a parallel flow rotary drum aggregate dryer, which was
Asphalt Plant "B", Gary, North Carolina facility. The facility was identified as a candidate by
EPA due to its location close to EPA facilities in Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, and
because it is typical of parallel flow rotary dryers in the asphalt production source category. The
results of the emissions testing program conducted at a facility employing a counter flow rotary
aggregate dryer are presented in a separate report.
The scope of the work assignment was to plan and conduct an air emissions testing
program to quantify emission rates of HAPs from the rotary aggregate drier located at Asphalt
Plant "B". The planning and testing phase of the program was conducted under EPA Contract
No. 68D20162, Work Assignment No. 4-13. Because the period of performance of the contract
expired on September 30,1997, PES was issued a second work assignment to complete the data
reduction, a portion of the analysis, and the preparation of the draft report, which was completed
under EPA Contract No. 68D70002, Work Assignment No. 0-005. This final report incorporates
comments from EPA and the National Asphalt Pavement Association, and includes a process
description and process data collected by EPA's Emission Standards Division (ESD) contractor.
The final report was prepared under EPA Contract No. 68D70069, Work Assignment No. 2-09.
The primary objective of the test program was to obtain data on the controlled and
uncontrolled emissions of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs or "dioxins") and
polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDFs or "furans"), paniculate matter (PM), and metallic HAP
and non-HAP compounds from rotary drum dryers. A secondary objective of the test program
was to observe and record plume opacity. The data will be used by ESD to determine whether
HAPs are emitted at levels that would justify regulation under the Maximum Achievable Control
Technology (MACT) program.
1-1
-------
The test program at Asphalt Plant "B" was completed during the week of August 25,
1997. The basic test methods that were employed were EPA Test Methods 1 (sample point
location), 2 (gas velocity and flow), 3B (gas molecular weight and emission correction factors),
4 (gas moisture content), 5 (particulate matter concentration), 9 (plume opacity),
23 (PCDDs/PCDFs concentrations) and 29 (metals concentrations). Particulate matter
concentrations were determined by using tared filters in the Method 29 sampling train. PES
conducted three sampling runs; the results of the test runs are presented in Section 2.0 of this
document. Although the work assignment called for three sampling runs to be conducted during
the production of asphalt concrete with reclaimed asphalt pavement or RAP, only two sampling
runs with RAP were conducted, at the direction of the EPA Work Assignment Manager. Three
test runs with RAP addition were desired, but not possible since the facility did not operate on
either the 25th or 26th of August due to lack of product demand. The third test run was
conducted while the facility was making asphalt without the addition of RAP to the mix.
PES used three subcontractors to assist in the completion of this testing effort. Deeco,
Inc. (DEECO) of Raleigh, North Carolina; Triangle Laboratories, Inc. (TLI) of Durham, North
Carolina, and Atlantic Technical Services, Inc. (ATS), of Chapel Hill, North Carolina. DEECO
provided source testing support at the inlet sampling location, visual emissions observations of
controlled emissions, and sample recovery support. TLI provided analytical services for the
quantification of PCDDs/PCDFs, and metals in the collected samples, and ATS provided on-site
sampling support as well as support during preparation of the site test plan, draft report and
calculation of the emissions testing results.
The test program organization and major lines of communication are presented in
Figure 1.1. The PES Project Manager communicated directly with the EPA Work Assignment
Manager and coordinated all of the on-site testing activities. The sampling locations at Asphalt
Plant "B" are shown in Figure 1.2.
1-2
-------
Asphalt Plant "B"
EPA/EMC
Work Assignment Manager
Michael L. Toney
(919) 541-5247
PES
Program Manager
John T. Chehaske
(703)471-8383
ES
: Officer
Van Atten
71-8383
—
PES
Project Manager
Michael D. Maret
(919) 941-O333
r
Pretest Silo Survey
PES
Silo-Specific
Test Plan
PES
T
Field Testing
PES
Subcontractor
Atlantic Technical
Services, Inc.
Subcontractor
Atlantic Technical
Services, Inc.
Subcontractor
DEECO
I
EPA/ESD
Lead Engineer
Mary K. Johnson
(919)541-O525
T
Analyses
PES
Report Preparation
PES
Subcontractor
Triangle
Laboratories, Inc.
Subcontractor
Atlantic Technical
Services, Inc.
Figure 1.1 Key Personnel and Responsibility for Testing - Asphalt Plant "B", Cary, NC
1-3
-------
Outlet Test Location • •
Inlet Test Location
Aggregate
Bins
Baghouse
>
•w
r
k
Knock-out Box
Rotary Drum Dryer
(Counter Flow)
Hot
Asphalt
Storage
Bins
Product is truck-
loaded out
Figure 1.2 Sampling Locations - Asphalt Plant "B", Gary, NC
1-4
-------
2.0 SUMMARY OF RESULTS
This section summarizes the results of testing program at Asphalt Plant "B". The
following pages present the times and durations of each of the sampling runs that were
conducted, the sampling parameters during each run, the effluent gas parameters, and the
concentrations and mass emission rates of the target HAPs. Sampling of emissions was
conducted on three consecutive days from August 27,1997 through August 29,1997, during
which time three sampling runs for both PCDDs/PCDFs metals were conducted at each test
location. Table 2.1 presents the "Emissions Test Log" which summarizes clock times, target
pollutants and down tunes due to filter and port changes for each of the Method 23 and Method
29 sampling runs attempted. The results of the PCDDs/PCDFs sampling during asphalt
production with RAP are presented in Tables 2.2 through 2.7, and the results of the
PCDDs/PCDFs sampling conducted during production with virgin aggregate (i.e., without RAP)
are presented in Tables 2.8 through 2.13. The results of the particulate matter and metals
sampling runs conducted during RAP addition are presented in Tables 2.14 through 2.19, and the
results of the PM and metals runs conducted during asphalt production with virgin aggregate are
presented in Tables 2.20 through 2.25.
2.1 OXYGEN AND CARBON DIOXIDE MEASUREMENTS
Concurrent with the Method 23 and Method 29 sampling at the baghouse outlet,
integrated bag samples of the effluent gas were collected and analyzed using an Orsat® apparatus
to determine oxygen and carbon dioxide concentrations for the purpose of calculating stack gas
molecular weight. The oxygen and carbon dioxide concentrations presented for the first
sampling run are the average of the oxygen and carbon dioxide concentrations measured during
runs two and three. The diluent concentrations are presented in this manner since the results of
the analyses from the first run were misplaced during the field testing portion of the test program,
and were not recovered. The diluent concentrations measured during the second and third runs
should be representative of the concentrations during the first run, since the operating conditions
were essentially unchanged.
2.2 PCDDs/PCDFs MEASUREMENTS
PCDDs/PCDFs results are presented as 1) actual concentrations and mass emission rates,
2) concentrations adjusted to 7 percent (%) oxygen (02), and 3) concentrations adjusted to 7%
O2 and 2378 TCDD toxic equivalent basis. Adjustment of the congeners to a 2378 TCDD toxic
equivalent basis was accomplished using the Toxic Equivalency Factor (TEF) values developed
2-1
-------
by the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, Committee on the Challenges of Modern Society,
August 1988.
The Method 23 sample fractions consisted of a sample train front-half solvent rinse, a
particulate filter, a back-half solvent rinse, and an XAD*-2 sorbent resin module. During
analysis, each of the sample fractions was extracted, concentrated, combined, and analyzed using
a Gas Chromatograph with a Mass Spectrometer detector (GC/MS), according the procedures
outlined in Method 23. During analysis, the combined sample extract was separated with a DB-5
capillary column. Where the results of that analysis indicated the presence of 2378 TCDF
congeners, the analysis was repeated using a DB-225 capillary column so that the TCDF
congeners could be more readily separated and quantified.
The results of the analyses indicated the presence of congeners that were qualified as
Estimated Maximum Possible Concentrations, or EMPCs. From tune to time during the Method
23 analyses, a peak elutes at the position expected for a particular congener, but the peak fails
validation based on the theoretical split of chlorine isotopes. That is to say that the number of
Cl35 isotopes and the number of Cl37 isotopes attached to the PCDDs/PCDFs congeners should
agree with the C135/C137 ratio found in nature. For each congener, this ratio must agree within
15%. If the mass ratio of chlorine isotopes does not agree with the natural chlorine isotope ratio,
then the peak is flagged as an EMPC.
In the calculation of average and total PCDDs/PCDFs congeners, analytical results below
the method detection limit have been assigned a value of zero, and are included in the calculation
of sums and averages. Congeners with that have been calculated as EMPC values are designated
using braces, {}, and the EMPC values are used to calculate sums and averages. If a sum or
average value is reported inside braces, then one (or more) EMPC values were used to calculate
this value.
The values presented as "Total PCDDs" are the sum of the "12346789 OCDD"
poly chlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin and all of the dioxins labeled "Total"; "Total PCDFs" values
are the sum of the "12346789 OCDF" polychlorinated dibenzofuran and all of the furans labeled
"Total". "Total PCDDs + Total PCDFs" values are the sum of the "Total PCDDs" and "Total
PCDFs" values. Values that have been qualified as being EMPC have been included in the sums.
Concentrations and emission rates based on or including EMPC values are denoted by braces
2-2
-------
TABLE 2.1
EMISSIONS SAMPLING TEST LOG
ASPHALT PLANT "B" - GARY, NC
Run ID
Date
Target
Pollutant
Run Time
(24-hr clock)
Down
Period(s)
Comment
Baghouse Inlet
R-M23-I-1'
R-M29-I-1*
R-M23-I-21
R-M29-I-2'
R-M23-I-3
R-M29-I-3
mi/9i
B/21/91
8/28/97
8/28/97
8/29/97
8/29/97
PCDDs/PCDFs
PM & Metals
PCDDs/PCDFs
PM & Metals
PCDDs/PCDFs
PM & Metals
0940-1227
1000-1200
0908-1428
1019-1427
0818-1413
0819-1403
0948-1014
1025-1030
1040-1049
1100-1107
1120-1131
1140-1146
1200-1206
1014-1015
1031-1041
1101-1107
1150-1156
1108-1328
1355-1405
1129
1355-1407
1018-1105
1138-1139
1153-1205
1105
1232
Filter Change
Filter Change
Filter Change
Filter Change
Filter Change
Plant Down
Filter Change
Plant Down
Filter Change
Filter Change
Filter Change
Filter Change &
Port Change
Plant Down
Filter Change
Plant Down
Plant Down
Filter Change &
Port Change
Power loss
Plant Down &
Filter Change
Filter & Port
Change
Stop for M23
Baghouse Outlet
R-M23-0-1
8/27/97
PCDDs/PCDFs
0940-1516
0950-1019
1029-1032
1052-1112
1140-1146
1158-1202
1242-1246
1326-1335
1402-1412
1427-1436
Stop for inlet1'
Stop for inlet*
Port Change
Plant Down
Port Change
Port Change
Port Change
Plant Down
Port Change
2-3
-------
TABLE 2.1 (CONCLUDED)
EMISSIONS SAMPLING TEST LOG
ASPHALT PLANT "B"- CARY, NC
Run ID
R-M29-O-1
R-M23-O-2
R-M29-O-2
R-M23-O-3
Date
8/27/97
8/28/97
8/28/97
8/29/97
Target
Pollutant
PM & Metals
PCDDs/PCDFs
PM & Metals
PCDDs/PCDFs
Run Time
(24-hr clock)
0940-1516
0746-1229
0746-1229
0809-1236
Down
Period(s)
0950-1019
1029-1032
1052-1112
1140-1146
1158-1202
1242-1246
1326-1335
1402-1412
1427-1436
0826-0830
0901-0909
0919-0921
1001-1004
1044-1049
1110-1128
1147-1149
0826-0830
0901-0909
0919-0921
1001-1004
1044-1049
1110-1128
1147-1149
0849-0852
0932-0935
1015-1018
1058-1102
1142-1145
1211-1222
Comment
Stop for inlet*1
Stop for inlet*1
Port Change
Plant Down
Port Change
Port Change
Port Change
Plant Down
Port Change
Port Change
Plant Down
Port Change
Port Change
Port Change
Plant Down
Port Change
Port Change
Plant Down
Port Change
Port Change
Port Change
Plant Down
Port Change
Port Change
Port Change
Port Change
Port Change
Port Change
Plant Down
1 Test runs were shortened due to high grain loading at the baghouse inlet.
b Sampling was delayed at the outlet so that sampling could be conducted nearly simultaneously with the inlet
sampling.
2-4
-------
2.2.1 Baghouse Inlet-Asphalt Production with RAP
In order to collect samples at the inlet location the filter holder in the Method 23 sampling
train was modified during the test program. These modifications were necessary due to the
extremely high grain loading at the baghouse inlet location, which caused the filters in the
Method 23 sampling train to plug. The high grain loading resulted in sampling at non-isokinetic
conditions during Run R-M23-I-1 since the sampling rate could not be maintained. After the
first sampling run, the filter holder was modified by replacing the 3-inch diameter filter with a 4-
inch diameter filter. In addition, precleaned Teflon* wool was placed into the front-half section
of the filter holder to serve as a pre-filter. Even with the filter modifications, stack particulate
loading conditions mandated frequent filter changes during the sample runs.
PES conducted two Method 23 sampling runs at the baghouse inlet during asphalt
production using RAP. Table 2.2 summarizes the PCDDs/PCDFs emissions sampling and stack
gas parameters at the baghouse inlet. The total sampling times for each run were 96 and 170
minutes for run R-M23-I-1 and R-M23-I-2, respectively, instead of the desired 240 minute run
time. The test runs were curtailed prematurely due to particulate loading in the gas stream which
exceeded the capacity of the Method 23 sampling train. The (2-run) average sample volume was
53.642 dry standard cubic feet (dscf) which is equivalent to 1.519 dry standard cubic meters
(dscm). The (2-run) average inlet gas temperature was 307°F and contained 5.2 % CO2, 13.4%
O2, and 28.8% moisture. The inlet gas volumetric flow rate was 47,515 actual cubic feet per
minute (acfm) which is equivalent to 23,004 dry standard cubic feet per minute (dscfm) or 651.4
dry standard cubic meters per minute (dscmm).
Table 2.3 presents the PCDDs/PCDFs stack gas concentrations and emission rates at the
baghouse inlet. The (2-run) average concentration of total PCDDs was {5.99} nanograms per
dry standard cubic meter (ng/dscm), and the (2-run) average concentration of total PCDFs was
{0.467} ng/dscm. The total PCDDs/PCDFs concentration was {6.46} ng/dscm. The (2-run)
average emission rate of total PCDDs was {234} micrograms per hour (^g/hr), and the (2-run)
average emission rate of total PCDFs was {18.3} /-ig/hr. The (2-run) average emission rate of
total PCDFs/PCDDs congeners was {252} ^g/hr.
Table 2.4 presents the PCDDs/PCDFs concentrations adjusted to 7% O2. The measured
stack gas O2 concentration was 13.4%. Therefore, the adjusted PCDDs/PCDFs concentrations
were greater than the actual concentrations. The (2-run) average adjusted concentration of total
PCDDs was 11.2 ng/dscm @ 7% O2. The (2-run) average adjusted concentration of total PCDFs
was {0.868} ng/dscm @ 7% O2. The (2-run) average adjusted concentration of total
PCDDs/PCDFs was {12.1} ng/dscm @ 7% O2. Table 2.4 also presents the adjusted
concentrations in 2378 TCDD toxic equivalents. The TEF concentration for total PCDDs was
0.011 ng/dscm @ 7% O2. Since no PCDF congeners chlorinated at the 2378 positions were
detected, the total TEF PCDDs/PCDFs concentration was also 0.011 ng/dscm @ 7% O2.
2-5
-------
TABLE 2.2
PCDDs/PCDFs EMISSIONS SAMPLING AND EXHAUST GAS PARAMETERS
ROTARY DRUM DRYER - BAGHOUSE INLET
ASPHALT PRODUCTION WITH RAP
ASPHALT PLANT "B"- GARY, NC
Run Number
Date
Sampling Duration, minutes
Average Sampling Rate, dscfm'
Sample Volume:
dscfb
dscmc
Average Exhaust Gas Temperature, °F
O2 Concentration, % by volume
CO2 Concentration, % by volume
Moisture, % by volume
Exhaust Gas Volumetric Flow Rate:
acfmd
dscfm"
dscmme
Isokinetic Sampling Ratio, %
R-M23-I-1
mi/97
96
0.59
56.399
1.597
308
13.8
5.2
29.9
48,074
22,981
650.7
115
R-M23-I-2
8/28/97
170
0.30
50.885
1.441
306
13.1
5.2
27.7
46,957
23,027
652.1
102.6
Average
133
0.45
53.642
1.519
307
13.4
5.2
28.8
47,515
23,004
651.4
108.8
' Dry standard cubic feet at 68°F and 1 atm.
b Dry standard cubic feet at 68°F and 1 atm.
c Dry standard cubic meters at 20°C and 1 atm.
* Actual cubic feet per minute at inlet gas conditions.
1 Dry standard cubic meters per minute at 20°C and 1 atm.
2-6
-------
TABLE23
PCDDs/PCDFs CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES
ROTARY DRUM DRYER - BAGHOUSE INLET
ASPHALT PRODUCTION WITH RAP
ASPHALT PLANT "B" - CARY, NC
Congener
Dioxins
2378 TCDD
Total TCDD
12378 PeCDD
Total PeCDD
123478 HxCDD
123678 HxCDD
123789 HxCDD
Total HxCDD
1234678 HpCDD
Total HpCDD
Octa CDD
Total PCDDs
Furans
2378 TCDF
Total TCDF
12378 PeCDF
23478 PeCDF
Total PeCDF
123478 HxCDF
123678 HxCDF
234678 HxCDF
123789 HxCDF
Total HxCDF
1234678 HpCDF
1234789 HpCDF
Total HpCDF
Octa CDF
Total PCDFs
Total PCDDs + PCDFs
Concentration*
ng/dscm, as measured
R-M23-I-1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
{0.219}
6.07
{6.29}
ND
{0.113}
ND
ND
0.294
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
(0.407)
{6.70}
R-M23-I-2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
5.69
5.69
ND
0.118
ND
ND
0.229
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
{0.180}
ND
10.527}
{6.22}
Average
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
{0.110}
5.88
{5.99}
0.00
{0.115}
0.00
0.00
0262
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
{0.0902}
0.00
10.467}
{6.46}
Emission Rate6
Hfi/hr
R-M23-M
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
{8.56}
237
{246}
ND
{4.40}
ND
ND
11.5
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
{15.9}
{262}
R-M23-I-2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
223
223
ND
4.62
ND
ND
8.96
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
{7.06}
ND
{20.61
{243}
Average
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
{4.28}
230
{234}
0.00
{4.51}
0.00
0.00
10.2
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
{3.53}
0.00
{18.3}
{252}
' Nanogram per dry standard cubic meter at 20°C and 1 atm.
b Micrograms per hour.
ND Non Detectable - Results are below target analyte detection limits. ND values are counted as zero in totals and
averages.
{ } Estimated Maximum Possible Concentration. EMPC values are counted in totals and averages.
2-7
-------
TABLE 2.4
PCDDs/PCDFs CONCENTRATIONS AND 2378 TOXIC EQUIVALENT
CONCENTRATIONS ADJUSTED TO 7 PERCENT OXYGEN
ROTARY DRUM DRYER - BAGHOUSE INLET
ASPHALT PRODUCTION WITH RAP
ASPHALT PLANT "B" - CARY, NC
fl
Congener
Dioxins
2378 TCDD
Total TCDD
12378 PeCDD
Total PeCDD
123478 HxCDD
123678 HxCDD
123789 HxCDD
Total HxCDD
1234678 HpCDD
Total HpCDD
Octa PCDDs
Total PCDDs
Furans
2378 TCDF
Total TCDF
12378 PeCDF
23478 PeCDF
Total PeCDF
123478 HxCDF
123678 HxCDF
234678 HxCDF
123789 HxCDF
Total HxCDF
1234678 HpCDF
1234789 HpCDF
Total HpCDF
Octa CDF
Total PCDFs
Total PCDDs + PCDFs
Concentration*
ng/dscm, adjusted to 7% O2
R-M23-I-1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
{0.429}
11.9
{12.3}
ND
{0.221}
ND
ND
0.576
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
{0.797}
{13.1}
R-M23-I-2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
10.1
10.1
ND
0.210
ND
ND
0.408
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
{0.322}
ND
{0.940}
{11.1}
Average
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
{0.215}
11.0
{11.2}
0.00
{0.215}
0.00
0.00
0.492
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
{0.161}
0.00
{0.868}
{12.1}
2378-
TCDDb
Toxic
Equiv.
Factor
1.000
0.500
0.100
0.100
0.100
0.010
0.001
0.100
0.050
0.500
0.100
0.100
0.100
0.100
0.010
0.010
0.001
2378 Toxic Equivalents
ng/dscm, adjusted to 7% O2
R-M23-I-1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.0119
0.0119
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.00
0.0119
R-M23-I-2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.0101
0.0101
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.00
0.0101
Average
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.011
0.011
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.011
' Nanogram per dry standard cubic meter adjusted to 7 percent oxygen at 20°C and 1 atm.
b North Atlantic Treaty Organization, Committee on the Challenges of Modem Society. Pilot study on International Information Exchange on
Dioxins and Related Compounds: International Toxicity Equivalency Factor G-TEF) Methods of Risk Assessment for Complex Mixtures of
Dioxins and Related Compounds. Report No. 176, August 1988.
ND Non Delectable - Results are below target analyte detection limits. ND values are counted as zero in totals and averages.
{ } Estimated Maximum Possible Concentration EMPC values are counted in totals and averages.
2-8
-------
2.2.2 Baghouse Outlet-Asphalt Production with RAP
PES conducted two Method 23 sampling runs at the baghouse outlet during asphalt
production using RAP. Table 2.5 summarizes the PCDDs/PCDFs emissions sampling and stack
gas parameters. The total sampling time for each run was 240 minutes. The (2-run) average
sample volume was 199.815 dscf or 5.658 dscm. The (2-run) average stack gas temperature was
285 °F and contained 4.45 % CO2,14.3% O2, and 30.3% moisture. The average stack gas
volumetric flow rate was 49,689 acfrn or 24,286 dscfm or 687.7 dscmm.
The isokinetic sampling ratio calculated for sampling run R-M23-O-1 was 115.5%. It is
the position of PES that this is an anomalous calculation of the isokinetic sampling ratio, and is
most likely due to an in-leakage of the impinger water bath into the water knock-out impinger
during the final leak check. Comparison of the Method 23 sampling data with the Method 29
sampling data on the outlet shows that the sampling times were identical and the sample volumes
were within 3% of each other (206.781 ft3 for R-M23-0-1 vs. 213.024 ft3 for R-M29-O-1). The
condensate collected in the Method 23 train was 451 grams more than that collected hi the
Method 29 train, however. When the quantity of condensate collected in the Method 29 train is
substituted into the Method 23 isokinetic calculation, the isokinetic sampling ratio is 108.6%.
No adjustments were made to the calculations for R-M23-O-1.
Table 2.6 presents the PCDDs/PCDFs stack gas concentrations and emission rates. The
(2-run) average concentration of total PCDDs was {0.269} ng/dscm. The (2-run) average
concentration of total PCDFs was {0.125} ng/dscm. The (2-run) average concentration of total
PCDDs/PCDFs was {0.394} ng/dscm. These values corresponded to (2-run) average emission
rates of {11.3} pg/hr for PCDDs, {5.32} ug/hr for PCDFs and {16.7} ug/hr, total
PCDDs/PCDFs for the two sampling runs. Table 2.7 presents the PCDDs/PCDFs concentrations
adjusted to 7% O2. The measured stack gas O2 concentration was 14.3%. Therefore, the
adjusted PCDDs/PCDFs concentrations were greater than the actual concentrations. The (2-run)
average adjusted concentration of total PCDDs was {0.532} ng/dscm @ 7% O2> and the (2-run)
average concentration of total PCDFs was {0.245} ng/dscm @ 7% O2. The (2-run) average
adjusted concentration of total PCDDs/PCDFs was {0.777} ng/dscm @ 7% O2.
Table 2.7 also presents the adjusted concentrations in 2378 TCDD toxic equivalents. No
2378 PCDD congeners were detected, therefore the concentration of PCDDs adjusted to 2378
toxic equivalents was zero. The (2-run) average concentration of PCDFs adjusted to 2378 toxic
equivalents was {0.00628} @ 7% O2, as was the (2-run) average TEF concentration for total
PCDDs/PCDFs.
2-9
-------
TABLE 2.5
PCDDs/PCDFs EMISSIONS SAMPLING AND STACK GAS PARAMETERS
ROTARY DRUM DRYER - BAGHOUSE OUTLET
ASPHALT PRODUCTION WITH RAP
ASPHALT PLANT "B" - CARY, NC
Run Number
Date
Sampling Duration, minutes
Average Sampling Rate, dscfrn"
Sample Volume:
dscf
dscmc
Stack Gas Temperature, °F
O2 Concentration, % by volume
CO2 Concentration, % by volume
Moisture, % by volume
Exhaust Gas Volumetric Flow Rate:
acfmd
dscfm"
dscmmc
Isokinetic Sampling Ratio, %
R-M23-O-1
8/27/97
240
0.86
206.781
5.855
283
15.0
4.0
32.2
49,075
23,450
664.0
115.5
R-M23-O-2
8/28/97
240
0.80
192.849
5.461
287
13.6
4.9
28.3
50,303
25,122
711.4
100.5
Average
240
0.83
199.815
5.658
285
14.3
4.45
30.3
49,689
24,286
687.7
108.0
* Dry standard cubic feet per minute at 68°F and 1 atm
b Dry standard cubic feet at 68 °F and 1 atm
c Dry standard cubic meters at 20 °C and 1 atm
d Actual cubic feet per minute at stack conditions
* Dry standard cubic meters per minute at 20 °C and 1 atm
2-10
-------
TABLE 2.6
PCDDs/PCDFs CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES
ROTARY DRUM DRYER - BAGHOUSE OUTLET
ASPHALT PRODUCTION WITH RAP
ASPHALT PLANT "B" - CARY, NC
Congener
Dioxins
2378 TCDD
Total TCDD
12378PeCDD
Total PeCDD
123478 HxCDD
123678 HxCDD
123789 HxCDD
Total HxCDD
1234678 HpCDD
Total HpCDD
Octa CDD
Total PCDDs
Furans
2378 TCDF
Total TCDF
12378 PeCDF
23478 PeCDF
Total PeCDF
123478 HxCDF
123678 HxCDF
234678 HxCDF
123789 HxCDF
Total HxCDF
1 234678 HpCDF
1 234789 HpCDF
Total HpCDF
Octa CDF
Total PCDFs
Total PCDDs + PCDFs
Concentration*
ng/dscm, as measured
S-M23-O-
1
ND
ND
ND
{0.0905}
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
{0.091}
ND
0.026
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.026
{0.116}
S-M23-O-
2
ND
ND
ND
{0.183}
ND
ND
ND
0.081
ND
{0.183}
ND
{0.447}
ND
ND
{0.0439}
ND
{0.0751}
ND
ND
ND
{0.0439}
{0.0842}
ND
ND
{0.0659}
ND
(0.225)
{0.672}
Average
0.00
0.00
0.00
{0.137}
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.040
0.00
{0.0916}
0.00
{0.269}
0.00
0.013
{0.022}
0.00
{0.0375}
0.00
0.00
0.00
{0.0220}
{0.0421}
0.00
0.00
{0.0330}
0.00
(0.1251
{0.394}
Emission Rateb
/ug/hr
S-M23-O-
1
ND
ND
ND
{3.61}
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
{3.61}
ND
1.02
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.02
{4.63}
S-M23-O-
2
ND
ND
ND
{7.82}
ND
ND
ND
3.44
ND
{7.82}
ND
{19.1}
ND
ND
{1.88}
ND
{3.20}
ND
ND
ND
{1.88}
{3.60}
ND
ND
{2.81}
ND
(9.6U
{28.7}
Average
0.00
0.00
0.00
{5.71}
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.720
0.00
{3.91}
0.00
{11.3}
0.00
0.510
{0.938}
0.00
{1.60}
0.00
0.00
0.00
{0.938}
{1.80}
0.00
0.00
{1.41}
0.00
(5.32\
{16.7}
* Nanogram per dry standard cubic meter at 20°C and 1 atm.
b Micrograms per hour.
ND Non Detectable - Results are below target analyte detection limits. ND values are counted as zero in totals and
averages.
{ } Estimated Maximum Possible Concentration. EMPC values are counted in totals and averages.
2-11
-------
TABLE 2.7
PCDDs/PCDFs CONCENTRATIONS AND 2378 TOXIC EQUIVALENT STACK
GAS CONCENTRATIONS ADJUSTED TO 7 PERCENT OXYGEN
ROTARY DRUM DRYER - BAGHOUSE OUTLET
ASPHALT PRODUCTION WITH RAP
ASPHALT PLANT "B" - CARY, NC
Congener
Dioxins
2378 TCDD
Total TCDD
12378 PeCDD
Total PeCDD
123478 HxCDD
123678 HxCDD
123789 HxCDD
Total HxCDD
1234678 HpCDD
Total HpCDD
Octa CDD
Total PCDDs
Furans
2378 TCDF
Total TCDF
12378 PeCDF
23478 PeCDF
Total PeCDF
123478 HxCDF
123678 HxCDF
234678 HxCDF
123789 HxCDF
Total HxCDF
1234678 HpCDF
1234789 HpCDF
Total HpCDF
Octa CDF
Total PCDFs
Total PCDDs +
Concentration*
ng/dscm, adjusted to 7 percent O2
R-M23-O-1
ND
ND
ND
{0.213}
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
{0.213}
ND
0.0604
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.0604
{0.274}
R-M23-O-2
ND
ND
ND
{0.349}
ND
ND
ND
0.153
ND
{0.349}
ND
{0.851}
ND
ND
{0.0837}
ND
{0.143}
ND
ND
ND
{0.0837}
{0.160}
ND
ND
{0.126}
ND
{0.429}
{1.28}
Average
0.00
0.00
0.00
{0.281}
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0767
0.00
{0.174}
0.00
{0.532}
0.00
0.0302
{0.0418}
0.00
{0.0715}
0.00
0.00
0.00
{0.0418}
{0.0802}
0.00
0.00
{0.0628}
0.00
{0.245}
{0.777}
2378-
TCDDb
Toxic
Equiv.
Factor
1.000
0.500
0.100
0.100
0.100
0.010
0.001
0.100
0.050
0.500
0.100
0.100
0.100
0.100
0.010
0.010
0.001
2378 Toxic Equivalencies
ng/dscm, adjusted to 7 percent O2
R-M23-O-1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.00
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.00
0.00
R-M23-O-2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.00
ND
{0.00418}
ND
ND
ND
ND
{0.00837}
ND
ND
ND
{0.0126}
{0.0126}
Average
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
{0.00209}
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
{0.00418}
0.00
0.00
0.00
{0.00628}
{0.00628}
Nanogram per dry standard cubic meter adjusted to 7 percent oxygen at 20°C and 1 atm.
k North Atlantic Treaty Organization, Committee on the Challenges of Modem Society. Pilot study on International Information Exchange on
Dioxins and Related Compounds: International Toxicity Equivalency Factor (I-TEF) Methods of Risk Assessment for Complex Mixtures of
Dioxins and Related Compounds. Report No. 176, August 1988.
ND Non Detectable - Results are below target analyte detection limits. ND values are counted as zero in totals and averages.
{ } Estimated Maximum Possible Concentration. EMPC values are counted in totals or averages.
2-12
-------
2.2.3 Baghouse Inlet - Asphalt Production without RAP
At the request of the EMC Work Assignment Manager, PES conducted one Method 23
sampling run at the baghouse inlet during asphalt production without the addition of RAP. Table
2.8 summarizes the PCDDs/PCDFs emissions sampling. The total sampling time for the test run
was 240 minutes. The sample volume was 80.735 dscf or 2.286 dscm. The stack gas
temperature was 290°F and contained 4.0 % CO2,15.2% 02, and 18.6% moisture. The stack gas
volumetric flow rate was 48,211 acfin or 27,178 dscfin or 769.6 dscmm.
Table 2.9 presents the PCDDs/PCDFs stack gas concentrations and emission rates. The
concentration of total PCDDs was 7.24 ng/dscm, and the concentration of total PCDFs was
{0.0394} ng/dcsm. The concentration of total PCDDs/PCDFs was {7.28} ng/dscm. These
values corresponded to emission rates of 334 |ag/hr for total PCDDs, {1.82} ng/hr for total
PCDFs, and {336} ng/hr for total PCDDs/PCDFs. Table 2.10 presents the PCDDs/PCDFs
concentrations adjusted to 7% O2. The measured stack gas O2 concentration was 15.2%.
Therefore, the adjusted PCDDs/PCDFs concentrations were greater than the actual
concentrations. The adjusted concentration of total PCDDs was 17.7 ng/dscm @ 7% O2, and the
adjusted concentration of total PCDFs was {0.0960} ng/dscm @ 7% O2. The adjusted
concentration of total PCDDs/PCDFs was {17.8} ng/dscm @ 7% O2.
Table 2.10 also presents the adjusted concentrations in 2378 TCDD toxic equivalents.
The concentration of total PCDDs adjusted to 2378 toxic equivalents was 0.0188 ng/dscm @ 7%
O2. The concentration of PCDFs adjusted to 2378 toxic equivalents was {0.00320} @ 7% O2,
and TEF concentration for total PCDDs/PCDFs was {0.0220} ng/dscm @ 7% O2.
2-13
-------
TABLE 2.8
PCDDs/PCDFs EMISSIONS SAMPLING AND STACK PARAMETERS
ROTARY DRUM DRYER - BAGHOUSE INLET
ASPHALT PRODUCTION WITHOUT RAP
ASPHALT PLANT "B" - CARY, NC
Run Number
Date
Sampling Duration, minutes
Average Sampling Rate, dscfin"
Sample Volume:
dscfb
dscmc
Exhaust Gas Temperature,0?
O2 Concentration, % by volume
CO2 Concentration, % by volume
Moisture, % by volume
Exhaust Gas Volumetric Flow Rate:
acfmd
dscfin"
dscmm6
Isokinetic Sampling Ratio, %
R-M23-I-3
8/29/97
240
0.34
80.735
2.286
290
15.2
4.0
18.6
48,211
27,178
769.6
97.7
1 Dry standard cubic feet per minute at 68 °F and 1 atm
b Dry standard cubic feet at 68° F and 1 atm
c Dry standard cubic meters at 20 °C and 1 atm
d Actual cubic feet per minute at stack conditions
e Dry standard cubic meters per minute at 20° C and 1 atm
2-14
-------
TABLE 2.9
PCDDs/PCDFs CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES
ROTARY DRUM DRYER - BAGHOUSE INLET
ASPHALT PRODUCTION WITHOUT RAP
ASPHALT PLANT "B" - CARY, NC
Congener
Dioxins
2378 TCDD
Total TCDD
12378 PeCDD
Total PeCDD
1 23478 HxCDD
123678 HxCDD
123789 HxCDD
Total HxCDD
1234678 HpCDD
Total HpCDD
Octa PCDDs
Total PCDDs
Furans
2378 TCDF
Total TCDF
12378 PeCDF
23478 PeCDF
Total PeCDF
123478 HxCDF
1 23678 HxCDF
234678 HxCDF
123789 HxCDF
Total HxCDF
1234678 HpCDF
1234789 HpCDF
Total HpCDF
Octa CDF
Total PCDFs
Total PCDDs + PCDFs
Concentration*
ng/dscm, as measured
R-M23-I-3
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.00875
0.0612
0.149
7.09
7.24
ND
0.00437
ND
ND
{0.00437}
0.00875
ND
{0.00262}
ND
0.0131
0.0175
ND
0.0175
ND
{0.0394}
{7.28}
Emission Rateb
ME/hr
R-M23-I-3
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.404
2.83
6.87
327
334
ND
0.202
ND
ND
{0.202}
0.404
ND
{0.121}
ND
0.606
0.808
ND
0.808
ND
{1.82}
{336}
* Nanograra per dry standard cubic meter at 20 CC and 1 atm.
b Micrograms per hour.
ND Non Detectable - Results are below target analyte detection limits. ND values are not counted in
totals or averages.
{ } Estimated Maximum Possible Concentration. EMPC values are counted in totals and averages.
2-15
-------
TABLE 2.10
PCDDs/PCDFs CONCENTRATIONS AND 2378 TOXIC EQUIVALENT STACK
GAS CONCENTRATIONS ADJUSTED TO 7 PERCENT OXYGEN
ROTARY DRUM DRYER - BAGHOUSE INLET
ASPHALT PRODUCTION WITHOUT RAP
ASPHALT PLANT "B" - CARY, NC
Congener
Dioxins
2378 TCDD
Total TCDD
12378 PeCDD
Total PeCDD
123478 HxCDD
123678 HxCDD
123789 HxCDD
Total HxCDD
1234678 HpCDD
Total HpCDD
Octa CDD
Total PCDDs
Furans
2378 TCDF
Total TCDF
12378 PeCDF
23478 PeCDF
Total PeCDF
123478 HxCDF
123678 HxCDF
234678 HxCDF
123789 HxCDF
Total HxCDF
1234678 HpCDF
1234789 HpCDF
Total HpCDF
Octa CDF
Total PCDFs
Total PCDDs +
PCDFs
Concentration*
ng/dscm, adjusted to 7% O2
R-M23-I-3
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.0213
0.149
0.363
17.3
17.7
ND
0.0107
ND
ND
{0.0107}
0.021
ND
{0.00640}
ND
0.0320
0.0427
ND
0.0427
ND
{0.0960}
{17.8}
2378-TCDD"
Toxic Equiv.
Factor
1.000
0.500
0.100
0.100
0.100
0.010
0.001
0.100
0.050
0.500
0.100
0.100
0.100
0.100
0.010
0.010
0.001
2378 Toxic Equivalents
ng/dscm, adjusted to 7% O2
R-M23-I-3
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.001
0.0173
0.0188
ND
ND
ND
0.00213
ND
{0.000640}
ND
0.000427
ND
ND
{0.00320}
{0.0220}
1 Nanogram per dry standard cubic meter adjusted to 7 percent oxygen at 20°C and 1 atm.
b North Atlantic Treaty Organization, Committee on the Challenges of Modern Society. Pilot study on international Information Exchange on
Dioxins and Related Compounds: International Toxicity Equivalency Factor fl-TEF) Methods of Risk Assessment for Complex Mixtures of
Dioxins and Related Compounds. Report No. 176, August 1988.
ND Non Detectable - Results are below target analyte detection limits ND values are counted as zero in totals and averages.
{ } Estimated Maximum Possible Concentration. EMPC values are counted in totals or averages.
2-16
-------
2.2.4 Baghouse Outlet - Asphalt Production without RAP
PES conducted one Method 23 sampling run at the baghouse outlet during asphalt
production without the addition of RAP. Table 2.11 summarizes the PCDDs/PCDFs emissions
sampling. The total sampling time for the test run was 240 minutes. The sample volume was
209.298 dscf or 5.927 dscm. The stack gas temperature was 268°F and contained 3.0 % CO2,
16.3% O2, and 19.6% moisture. The stack gas volumetric flow rate was 49,832 acfin or 28,612
dscfm or 810.2 dscmm.
Table 2.12 and 2.13 presents the PCDDs/PCDFs stack gas concentrations and emission
rates. No PCDDs congeners were detected. The concentration of total PCDFs was {0.00337}
ng/dscm. The emission rate of total PCDFs was {0.164} ug/hr. Table 2.13 presents the
PCDDs/PCDFs concentrations adjusted to 7% O2. The measured stack gas O2 concentration was
16.3%. Therefore, the adjusted PCDFs concentrations were greater than the actual
concentrations. The adjusted concentration of total PCDFs was {0.0102} ng/dscm @ 7% O2.
Table 2.13 also presents the adjusted concentrations in 2378 toxic equivalents. The TEF
concentration for total PCDDs/PCDFs was 0.00 ng/dscm @ 7% O2.
2.3 PARTICULATE MATTER AND METALS MEASUREMENTS
2.3.1 Baghouse Inlet-Asphalt Production with RAP
PES conducted two Method 29 sampling runs at the baghouse inlet during asphalt
production using RAP. Table 2.14 summarizes the particulate matter/metals emissions sampling
and exhaust gas parameters. The total sampling time was 87 minutes for sampling run
R-M29-I-1, and 200 minutes for sampling run R-M29-I-2; sampling durations were shortened
due to the nigh inlet grain loading conditions explained previously. The (2-run) average sample
volume was 55.333 dscf or 1.567 dscm. The (2-run) average exhaust gas temperature was 306
°F, and contained 4.9% CO2, 13.6% O2, and 27.9% moisture. The (2-run) average exhaust gas
volumetric flow rate was 48,440 acfm or 23,776 dscfm or 673 dscm.
Table 2.15 summarizes the exhaust gas particulate matter concentrations and emission
rates at the baghouse inlet. The (2-run) average concentration was 55.3 grains per dry standard
cubic foot (gr/dscf) or 126.4 grams per dry standard cubic meter (g/dscm). The concentrations
are also shown adjusted to 7% O2. The (2-run) average mass emission rate was 11,271 pounds
per hour (Ib/hr) or 5,113 kilograms per hour (kg/hr).
Table 2.16 summarizes the exhaust gas metals concentrations and emission rates. Most of
the target metals were found to be present in both samples. The (2-run) average concentrations
ranged from 2,629 micrograms per dry standard cubic meter (//g/dscm) for phosphorus to 0.115
/ug/dscm for selenium.
2-17
-------
TABLE 2.11
PCDDs/PCDFs EMISSIONS SAMPLING AND STACK PARAMETERS
ROTARY DRUM DRYER - BAGHOUSE OUTLET
ASPHALT PRODUCTION WITHOUT RAP
ASPHALT PLANT "B" - CARY, NC
Run Number
Date
Sampling Duration, minutes
Average Sampling Rate, dscfma
Sample Volume:
dscfb
dscmc
Exhaust Gas Temperature,0?
O2 Concentration, % by volume
CO2 Concentration, % by volume
Moisture, % by volume
Exhaust Gas Volumetric Flow Rate:
acrm"
dscftna
dscmme
Isokinetic Sampling Ratio, %
R-M23-O-3
8/29/97
240
0.87
209.298
5.927
268
16.3
3.0
19.6
49,832
28,612
810.2
99.6
* Dry standard cubic feet per minute at 68° F and 1 atm
b Dry standard cubic feet at 68 °F and 1 atm
c Dry standard cubic meters at 20 °C and 1 atm
a Actual cubic feet per minute at stack conditions
' Dry standard cubic meters per minute at 20 °C and 1 atm
2-18
-------
TABLE 2.12
PCDDs/PCDFs CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES
ROTARY DRUM DRYER - BAGHOUSE OUTLET
ASPHALT PRODUCTION WITHOUT RAP
ASPHALT PLANT "B" - CARY, NC
Congener
Dioxins
2378 TCDD
Total TCDD
12378 PeCDD
Total PeCDD
123478 HxCDD
123678 HxCDD
123789 HxCDD
Total HxCDD
1234678 HpCDD
Total HpCDD
Octa CDD
Total PCDDs
Furans
2378 TCDF
Total TCDF
12378 PeCDF
23478 PeCDF
Total PeCDF
123478 HxCDF
123678 HxCDF
234678 HxCDF
123789 HxCDF
Total HxCDF
1234678 HpCDF
1234789 HpCDF
Total HpCDF
Octa CDF
Total PCDFs
Total PCDDs + PCDFs
Concentration*
ng/dscm, as measured
R-M23-O-3
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.00
ND
ND
ND
ND
{0.00337}
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
{0.003371
{0.00337}
Emission Rateb
Mg/hr
R-M23-O-3
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.00
ND
ND
ND
ND
{0.164}
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
(0.1641
{0.164}
" Nanogram per dry standard cubic meter at 20°C and 1 aim.
b Micrograms per hour.
ND Non Detectable - Results are below target analyte detection limits. ND values are counted as zero in
totals and averages.
{ } Estimated Maximum Possible Concentration. EMPC values are counted in totals or averages.
2-19
-------
TABLE 2.13
PCDDs/PCDFs CONCENTRATIONS AND 2378 TOXIC EQUIVALENT
CONCENTRATIONS ADJUSTED TO 7 PERCENT OXYGEN
ROTARY DRUM DRYER - BAGHOUSE OUTLET
ASPHALT PRODUCTION WITHOUT RAP
ASPHALT PLANT "B" - CARY, NC
Congener
Dioxins
2378 TCDD
Total TCDD
12378PeCDD
Total PeCDD
123478 HxCDD
123678 HxCDD
123789 HxCDD
^Total HxCDD
1234678 HpCDD
Total HpCDD
Octa CDD
Total PCDDs
Furans
2378 TCDF
Total TCDF
12378 PeCDF
23478 PeCDF
Total PeCDF
123478 HxCDF
123678 HxCDF
234678 HxCDF
123789 HxCDF
Total HxCDF
1234678 HpCDF
1234789 HpCDF
Total HpCDF
Octa CDF
Total PCDFs
Total PCDDs + PCDFs
Concentration'
ng/dscm, adjusted to 7% O2
R-M23-O-3
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.00
ND
ND
ND
ND
{0.0102}
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
{0.0102}
{0.0102}
2378-TCDDb
Toxic Equiv.
Factor
1.000
0.500
0.100
0.100
0.100
0.010
0.001
0.100
0.050
0.500
0.100
0.100
0.100
0.100
0.010
0.010
0.001
2378 Toxic Equivalents
ng/dscm, adjusted to 7% O2
R-M23-O-3
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.00
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.00
0.00
• Nanogram per dry standard cubic meter adjusted to 7 percent oxygen at 20°C and 1 atm.
* North Atlantic Treaty Organization, Committee on the Challenges of Modem Society. Pilot study on International Information Exchange on
Dioxins and Related Compounds: International Toxicity Equivalency Factor (I-TEF) Methods of Risk Assessment for Complex Mixtures of
Dioxins and Related Compounds. Report No. 176, August 1988
ND Non Detectable - Results are below target analyte detection limits. ND values are counted as zero in totals and averages.
{} Estimated Maximum Possible Concentration. EMPC values are counted in totals or averages.
2-20
-------
TABLE 2.14
PARTICIPATE MATTER/METALS EMISSIONS SAMPLING
AND INLET GAS PARAMETERS
ROTARY DRUM DRYER - BAGHOUSE INLET
ASPHALT PRODUCTION WITH RAP
ASPHALT PLANT "B" - CARY, NC
Run Number
Date
Time
Sampling Duration, minutes
Average Sampling Rate, dscfhi"
Sample Volume:
dscf b
dscmc
Exhaust Gas Temperature,0?
O2 Concentration, % by volume
CO2 Concentration, % by volume
Moisture, % by volume
Exhaust Gas Volumetric Flow Rate:
acfind
dscfrn"
dscmme
Isokinetic Sampling Ratio, %
R-M29-I-1
8/27/97
1000-1200
87
0.573
49.883
1.413
304
14.2
4.6
28.5
48,345
23,687
671
109.7
R-M29-I-2
8/28/97
1019-1427
200
0.304
60.783
1.721
309
13.1
5.2
27.3
48,535
23,865
676
100.5
Average
143.5
0.439
55.333
1.567
306
13.6
4.9
27.9
48,440
23,776
673
105.1
1 Dry standard cubic feet per minute at 68°F and 1 atm.
b Dry standard cubic feet at 68°F and 1 atm.
c Dry standard cubic meters at 20°C and 1 atm.
d Actual cubic feet per minute at inlet gas conditions.
' Dry standard cubic meters per minute at 20°C and 1 atm.
2-21
-------
TABLE 2.15
PARTICIPATE MATTER CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES
ROTARY DRUM DRYER - BAGHOUSE INLET
ASPHALT PRODUCTION WITH RAP
ASPHALT PLANT "B" - CARY, NC
Run Number
Date
Time
Concentration:
gr/dscf
gr/dscf@7%O2b
g/dscmc
g/dscm @ 7% O2d
Emission Rate:
lb/hre
kg/hi*
R-M29-I-1
8/27/97
1000-1200
42.2
87.5
96.5
200
8,561
3,883
R-M29-I-2
8/28/97
1019-1427
68.3
121.8
156.4
279
13,981
6,342
Average
55.3
104.6
126.4
239
11,271
5,113
* Grains per dry standard cubic foot at 68°F and 1 atm.
b Grains per dry standard cubic foot at 68°F and 1 atm adjusted to 7 percent O2.
c Grams per dry standard cubic meter at 20°C and 1 atm.
d Grams per dry standard cubic meter at 20 °C and 1 atm adjusted to 7 percent O2.
" Pounds per hour.
f Kilograms per hour.
2-22
-------
TABLE 2.16
METALS CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES
ROTARY DRUM DRYER - BAGHOUSE INLET
ASPHALT PRODUCTION WITH RAP
ASPHALT PLANT "B" - CARY, NC
Run Number
Date
Time
Antimony (Sb)
Aig/dscm1
Mg/dscm @ 7% O2b
g/hr<
Arsenic (As)
/ug/dscm*
/^g/dscm @ 7% O2b
g/hr<
Barium (Ba)
//g/dscm"
/^g/dscm @ 7% O2b
g/hr*
Beryllium (Be)
jug/dscm*
//g/dscm @ 7% O2b
g/hr*
Cadmium (Cd)
/^g/dscm*
A
-------
TABLE 2.16 (Concluded)
METALS CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES
ROTARY DRUM DRYER - BAGHOUSE INLET
ASPHALT PRODUCTION WITH RAP
ASPHALT PLANT "B" - CARY, NC
Run Number
Lead (Pb)
/ug/dscmm
Aig/dscm @ 7% O2b
g/hr*
Manganese (Mn)
/^g/dscm'
/Lig/dscm @ 7% O2b
g/hr<
Mercury (Hg)
/ug/dscm*
yug/dscm @ 7% O2b
g/hr0
Nickel (Ni)
,ug/dscm'
^g/dscm @ 7% O2b
g/hr<
Phosphorus (P)
yug/dscm*
^g/dscm @ 7% O2b
g/hr<
Silver (Ag)
/ug/dscm*
^g/dscm @ 7% O2b
g/hr*
Selenium (Se)
/ug/dscm*
^g/dscm @ 7% O2b
g/hr0
Thallium (Tl)
^g/dscm'
Aig/dscm @ 7% O2b
g/hr"
Zinc (Zn)
/^g/dscm*
Aig/dscm @ 7% O2b
g/hr*
R-M29-I-1
60.4
125
2.43
1750
3630
70.4
ND
ND
ND
41.7
86.6
1.68
3,009
6,242
121
0.850
1.76
0.0342
ND
ND
ND
8.64
17.9
0.348
539
1118
21.7
R-M29-I-2
48.3
86.0
1.96
1,357
2,418
55.0
ND
ND
ND
33.9
60.5
1.38
2,251
4,011
91.3
0.581
1.04
0.0236
0.230
0.410
0.00933
4.98
8.88
0.202
397
707
16.1
Average
54.3
106
2.19
1,553
3,024
62.7
0.00
0.00
0.00
37.8
73.5
1.53
2,629
5,126
106
0.715
1.40
0.0289
0.115
0.205
0.00466
6.81
13.4
0.275
468
913
18.9
Micrograms per dry standard cubic meter @ 20° C and 1 atm.
Micrograms per dry standard cubic meter @ 20°C and 1 atm, adjusted to 7% Q.
Grams per hour.
2-24
-------
2.3.2 Baghouse Outlet-Asphalt Production with RAP
PES conducted two Method 29 sampling runs at the baghouse outlet during production
with RAP. Table 2.17 summarizes the particulate matter/metals emissions sampling and stack
gas parameters. The total sampling time for each test run was 240 minutes. The (2-run) average
sample volume was 197.630 dscf or 5.596 dscm. The (2-run) average stack gas temperature was
291 °F and contained 4.5% CO2,14.3% O2> and 27.1% moisture. The average (2-run) stack gas
volumetric flow rate was 50,276 acfin or 25,559 dscftn or 724 dscmm. The (2-run) average stack
gas opacity was less than 5%.
Table 2.18 summarizes the stack gas particulate matter concentrations and emission rates.
The (2-run) average concentration was 0.00832 gr/dscf or 0.0190 g/dscm. The concentrations
are also shown adjusted to 7% O2. The (2-run) average emission rate was 1.82 Ib/hr or
0.826 kg/hr.
Table 2.19 summarizes the stack gas metals concentrations and emission rates. Most of
the target metals were found to be present in both samples. The (2-run) average concentrations
ranged from 0.0524 ug/dscm for silver to 20.2 ug/dscm for phosphorus.
2.3.3 Baghouse Inlet - Asphalt Production without RAP
PES conducted one test run at the baghouse inlet during asphalt production without the
addition of RAP. Table 2.20 summarizes the particulate matter/metals emissions sampling and
stack gas parameters. The total sampling time for the test run was 240 minutes. The sample
volume was 81.522 dscf or 2.308 dscm. The stack gas temperature was 289°F and contained
4.0% CO2,15.2% O2, and 18.9% moisture. The stack gas volumetric flow rate was 48,550 acfm
or 27,325 dscfm or 774 dscmm.
Table 2.21 summarizes the stack gas particulate matter concentrations and emission rates.
The concentration was 76.8 gr/dscf or 175.7 g/dscm. The concentrations are also shown adjusted
to 7% O2. The average emission rate was 17,789 Ib/hr or 8,155 kg/hr.
Table 2.22 summarizes the stack gas metals concentrations and emission rates. Most of
the target metals were present in the sample. Concentrations ranged from 0.291 ug/dscm for
silver to 2,170 ng/dscm for phosphorus.
2-25
-------
TABLE 2.17
PARTICULATE/METALS EMISSIONS SAMPLING AND STACK GAS PARAMETERS
ROTARY DRUM DRYER - BAGHOUSE OUTLET
ASPHALT PRODUCTION WITH RAP
ASPHALT PLANT «B" - CARY, NC
Run Number
Date
Sampling Duration, minutes
Average Sampling Rate, dscfm"
Sample Volume:
dscfb
dscmc
Stack Gas Temperature,0?
O2 Concentration, % by volume
CO2 Concentration, % by volume
Moisture, % by volume
Exhaust Gas Volumetric Flow Rate:
acfmd
dscfrna
dscmme
Isokinetic Sampling Ratio, %
Stack Gas Opacity:
Average Opacity, %
Calculated Average, %
Max. Single Reading, %
Max. 6-min. Block Avg., %
Max. 6-min Rolling Avg., %
R-M29-O-1
mi/9i
240
0.888
213.024
6.032
289
15
4.0
26.5
51,035
26,285
744
109.5
<5
0.67
10
0.63
0.71
R-M29-O-2
8/28/97
240
0.759
182.236
5.160
292
13.6
4.9
27.7
49,516
24,833
703
99.2
<5
0.21
10
0.68
0.95
Average
240
0.823
197.630
5.596
291
14.3
4.5
27.1
50,276
25,559
724
104.3
<5
0.44
10
0.65
0.83
' Dry standard cubic feet per minute at 68°F and 1 atm.
b Dry standard cubic feet at 68°F and 1 atm.
c Dry standard cubic meters at 20°C and 1 atm.
d Actual cubic feet per minute at stack conditions.
' Dry standard cubic meters per minute at 20°C and 1 atm.
2-26
-------
TABLE 2.18
PARTICULATE MATTER CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES
ROTARY DRUM DRYER - BAGHOUSE OUTLET
ASPHALT PRODUCTION WITH RAP
ASPHALT PLANT «B" - CARY, NC
Run Number
Date
Time
Concentration:
gr/dscf
gr/dscf@7%O2b
g/dscmc
g/dscm @ 7% O2d
Emission Rate:
lb/hrc
kg/h/
R-M29-0-1
mi/91
0940-1516
0.00832
0.0196
0.0190
0.0448
1.87
0.850
R-M29-O-2
8/28/97
0746-1229
0.00832
0.0158
0.0190
0.0362
1.77
0.803
Average
0.00832
0.0177
0.0190
0.0405
1.82
0.826
1 Grains per dry standard cubic foot at 68°F and 1 atm.
b Grains per dry standard cubic foot at 68°F and 1 atm adjusted to 7 percent O2.
c Grams per dry standard cubic meter at 20°C and 1 atm.
d Grams per dry standard cubic meter at 20°C and 1 atm adjusted to 7 percent O2.
e Pounds per hour.
' Kilograms per hour.
2-27
-------
TABLE 2.19
METALS CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES
ROTARY DRUM DRYER - BAGHOUSE OUTLET
ASPHALT PRODUCTION WITH RAP
ASPHALT PLANT "B" - CARY, NC
iun Number
Date
Clock Time, 24-hr Clock
Antimony (Sb)
/^g/dscm*
/^g/dscm @ 7% O2b
g/hr*
Arsenic (As)
^g/dscm*
/^g/dscm @ 7% O2b
g/hr*
Barium (Ba)
Aig/dscm*
Mg/dscm @ 7% O2b
g/hr*
Beryllium (Be)
Aig/dscm*
Aig/dscm @ 7% O2b
g/hr<
Cadmium (Cd)
^g/dscm*
Aig/dscm @ 7% O2b
g/hr*
Chromium (Cr)
/^g/dscm*
Mg/dscm @ 7% O2b
g^ir'
Cobalt (Co)
^g/dscm*
Mg/dscm @ 7% O2b
g/hf
Copper (Cu)
Aig/dscm*
/^g/dscm @ 7% O2b
gAif
Lead (Pb)
/^g/dscm*
Mg/dscm @ 7% O2b
gAir^
R-M29-O-1
mi/91
0940-1516
0.637
1.50
0.0284
ND
ND
ND
9.10
21.4
0.406
ND
ND
ND
0.0794
0.187
0.00355
2.19
5.16
0.0978
ND
ND
ND
1.54
3.63
0.0688
1.42
3.34
0.0632
R-M29-O-2
8/28/97
0746-1229
0.693
1.32
0.0292
ND
ND
ND
7.92
15.1
0.334
ND
ND
ND
0.0708
0.135
0.00299
2.14
4.07
0.0901
ND
ND
ND
1.38
2.63
0.0584
1.03
1.95
0.0433
Average
0.665
1.41
0.0288
0.00
0.00
0.00
8.51
18.3
0.370
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.751
0.161
0.00327
2.16
4.61
0.0939
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.46
3.13
0.0636
1.22
2.64
0.0533
2-28
-------
TABLE 2.19 (Concluded)
METALS CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES
ROTARY DRUM DRYER - BAGHOUSE OUTLET
ASPHALT PRODUCTION WITH RAP
ASPHALT PLANT "B" - CARY, NC
Run Number
Manganese (Mn)
/^g/dscm'
Aig/dscm @ 7% O2b
g/hi*
Mercury (Hg)
^g/dscm*
Mg/dscm @ 7% O2b
g/hr*
Nickel (Ni)
,ug/dscm'
yug/dscm @ 7% O2b
g/hr<
Phosphorus (P)
/^g/dscm*
Aig/dscm @ 7% O2b
g/hr*
Silver (Ag)
.ug/dscm'
^g/dscm @ 7% O2b
g/hr<
Selenium (Se)
/^g/dscm*
/^g/dscm @ 7% O2b
gAi^
Thallium (Tl)
jUg/dscm*
Mg/dscm @ 7% O2b
g^r=
Zinc (Zn)
^g/dscm*
^g/dscm @ 7% O2b
g^ir1
R-M29-O-1
11.6
27.4
0.519
ND
ND
ND
1.55
3.66
0.0694
18.2
42.9
0.814
0.0627
0.148
0.00280
0.934
2.20
0.0417
ND
ND
ND
7.34
17.3
0.328
R-M29-O-2
14.5
27.6
0.612
ND
ND
ND
1.26
2.40
0.0531
22.2
42.3
0.937
0.0421
0.080
0.00177
0.888
1.69
0.0375
ND
ND
ND
5.01
9.54
0.211
Average
13.1
27.5
0.565
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.41
3.03
0.0612
20.2
42.6
0.876
0.0524
0.114
0.00229
0.911
1.95
0.0396
0.00
0.00
0.00
6.18
13.4
0.270
1 Micrograms per dry standard cubic meter @ 20° C and 1 atm.
b Micrograms per dry standard cubic meter @ 20°C and 1 atm, adjusted to 7% O2.
c Grams per hour.
2-29
-------
TABLE 2.20
PARTICULATE MATTER/METALS EMISSIONS SAMPLING
AND STACK GAS PARAMETERS
ROTARY DRUM DRYER - BAGHOUSE INLET
ASPHALT PRODUCTION WITHOUT RAP
ASPHALT PLANT "B" - CARY, NC
Run Number
R-M29-I-3
Date
Sampling Duration, minutes
Average Sampling Rate, dscfin*
Sample Volume:
dscfb
dscmc
Exhaust Gas Temperature,.0?
O2 Concentration, % by volume
CO2 Concentration, % by volume
Moisture, % by volume
Exhaust Gas Volumetric Flow Rate:
acfmd
dscfm"
dscmme
Isokinetic Sampling Ratio, %
8/29/97
240
0.340
81.522
2.308
289
15.2
4.0
18.9
48,550
27,325
774
96.1
* Dry standard cubic feet per minute at 68°F and 1 atm.
b Dry standard cubic feet at 68° F and 1 atm.
c Dry standard cubic meters at 20°C and 1 atm.
d Actual cubic feet per minute at stack conditions.
e Dry standard cubic meters per minute at 20°C and 1 atm.
2-30
-------
TABLE 2.21
PARTICULATE MATTER CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES
ROTARY DRUM DRYER - BAGHOUSE INLET
ASPHALT PRODUCTION WITHOUT RAP
ASPHALT PLANT "B" - CARY, NC
Run Number
Date
Time
Concentration:
gr/dscfa
gr/dscf@7%02b
g/dscmc
g/dscm @ 7% O2d
Emission Rate:
lb/hre
kg/h/
R-M29-I-3
8/29/97
0819-1403
76.8
187.2
175.7
428
17,879
8,155
' Grains per dry standard cubic foot at 68°F and 1 atm.
b Grains per dry standard cubic foot at 68°F and 1 atm adjusted to 7 percent O2.
c Grams per dry standard cubic meter at 20°C and 1 atm.
d Grams per dry standard cubic meter at 20 °C and 1 atm adjusted to 7 percent O2.
' Pounds per hour.
f Kilograms per hour.
2-31
-------
TABLE 2.22
METALS CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES
ROTARY DRUM DRYER - BAGHOUSE INLET
ASPHALT PRODUCTION WITHOUT RAP
ASPHALT PLANT "B" - CARY, NC
Run Number
Date
Time
Antimony (Sb)
//g/dscm*
/ug/dscm @ 7% O2b
g/hr*
Arsenic (As)
/ug/dscm'
Mg/dscm @ 7% O2b
g/hf
Barium (Ba)
^g/dscm*
/^g/dscm @ 7% O2b
g/hr*
Beryllium (Be)
^g/dscma
yug/dscm @ 7% O2b
gAir0
Cadmium (Cd)
^g/dscm'
Mg/dscm @ 7% O2b
gAir'
Total Chromium (Cr)
Mg/dscm"
Mg/dscm @ 7% O2b
g/hi*
Cobalt (Co)
/ug/dscm"
/ug/dscm @ 7% O2b
g^ir0
Copper (Cu)
Aig/dscm"
/^g/dscm @ 7% O2b
g^r*
Lead (Pb)
Aig/dscm"
Mg/dscm @ 7% O2b
g^ir*
R-M29-I-3
8/29/97
0819-1403
ND
ND
ND
2.13
5.19
0.0987
318
776
14.8
ND
ND
ND
4.25
10.4
0.197
33.3
81.2
1.55
19.7
48.1
0.915
263
641
12.2
35.8
87.4
1.66
2-32
-------
TABLE 2.22 (Concluded)
METALS CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES
ROTARY DRUM DRYER - BAGHOUSE INLET
ASPHALT PRODUCTION WITHOUT RAP
ASPHALT PLANT "B" - CARY, NC
Run Number
Manganese (Mn)
Aig/dscm"
^g/dscm @ 7 % O2b
g/hrc
Mercury (Hg)
/ug/dscm"
/ug/dscm @ 7 % O2b
g/hrc
Nickel (Ni)
jUg/dscm3
/ug/dscm@7% O2b
g/hrc
Phosphorus (P)
^g/dscm*
/^g/dscm @ 7 % O2b
g/hrc
Silver (Ag)
^g/dscma
/ug/dscm @ 7% O2b
g/hrc
Selenium (Se)
yug/dscm"
^g/dscm@7% O2b
g/hrc
Thallium (Tl)
/ug/dscma
,ug/dscm @ 7% O2b
g/hrc
Zinc (Zn)
Aig/dscma
Mg/dscm@7% O2b
g/hrc
R-M29-I-3
975
2377
45.3
ND
ND
ND
21.8
53.1
1.01
2170
5292
101
0.291
0.709
0.0135
ND
ND
ND
0.901
2.20
0.0418
239
584
11.1
* Micrograms per dry standard cubic meter @ 20° C and 1 atm.
b Micrograms per dry standard cubic meter @ 20°C and 1 atm, adjusted to 7% O2.
c Grams per hour.
2-33
-------
2.3.4 Baghouse Outlet - Asphalt Production without RAP
PES conducted one test run at the baghouse outlet during asphalt production without the
addition of RAP. Table 2.23 summarizes the particulate matter/metals emissions sampling and
stack gas parameters. The total sampling time for the test run was 240 minutes. The sample
volume was 205.914 dscf or 5.831 dscm. The stack gas temperature was 274°F and contained
3.0% CO2, 16.3% O2, and 20.8% moisture. The stack gas volumetric flow rate was 50,521 acfhi
or 28,440 dscfm or 805 dscmm.
Table 2.24 summarizes the stack gas particulate matter concentrations and emission rates.
The concentration was 0.0132 gr/dscf or 0.0303 g/dscm. The concentrations are also shown
adjusted to 7% O2. The emission rate was 3.23 Ib/hr or 1.46 kg/hr.
Table 2.25 summarizes the stack gas metals concentrations and emission rates. Not all of
the target metals were detected in the samples. Detected concentrations ranged from 0.0336
Hg/dscm for cadmium to 24.9 jag/dscm for phosphorus.
2.4 VISIBLE EMISSIONS OBSERVATIONS
Visible Emissions Observations (VEOs) of the stack exhaust were made during the
testing by a certified observer. Observations were made simultaneously with the testing, except
during the first run when VEOs were suspended during the period from 1207 to 1304 when the
location of the sun was directly over the observer. The average opacity during asphalt
production with RAP is presented along with the outlet stack gas parameters in Table 2.14. For
each run the calculated average opacities were 2.15, 1.21, and 0.702%. Since VEO observations
are recorded in 5% increments, the average opacity during these runs is more properly reported
as less than 5% opacity. Also presented are the maximum single opacity observed, the maximum
6-minute block average, and the maximum 6-minute rolling average during each test run. During
the production of asphalt without RAP, the calculated average opacity of the outlet gas stream
was 0.104%; however, this result is more properly reported as an average opacity of < 5 %. The
opacity data during production with RAP are presented along with the stack gas parameters in
Table 2.17.
2-35
-------
TABLE 2.23
PARTICULATE MATTER/METALS EMISSIONS SAMPLING
AND STACK GAS PARAMETERS
ROTARY DRUM DRYER - BAGHOUSE OUTLET
ASPHALT PRODUCTION WITHOUT RAP
ASPHALT PLANT "B" - CARY, NC
Run Number
R-M29-O-3
Date
Sampling Duration, minutes
Average Sampling Rate, dscfm3
Sample Volume:
dscf
dscmc
Exhaust Gas Temperature,.0?
O2 Concentration, % by volume
CO2 Concentration, % by volume
Moisture, % by volume
Exhaust Gas Volumetric Flow Rate:
acmid
dscfm8
dscmmc
Isokinetic Sampling Ratio, %
Stack Gas Opacity:
Average Opacity, %
Calculated Average, %
Max, Single Reading, %
Max. 6-min. Block Avg., %
Max. 6-min Rolling Avg., %
8/29/97
240
0.858
205.914
5.831
274
16.3
3.0
20.8
50,521
28,440
805
97.8
<5
0.965
10
2.29
3.07
' Dry standard cubic feet per minute at 68 °F and 1 atm.
b Dry standard cubic feet at 68 °F and 1 atm.
c Dry standard cubic meters at 20°C and 1 atm.
d Actual cubic feet per minute at stack cond'tions.
' Dry standard cubic meters per minute at 20°C and 1 atm.
2-35
-------
TABLE 2.24
PARTICIPATE MATTER CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES
ROTARY DRUM DRYER - BAGHOUSE OUTLET
ASPHALT PRODUCTION WITHOUT RAP
ASPHALT PLANT "B" - CARY, NC
Run Number
Date
Time
Concentration:
gr/dscfa
gr/dscf@7%O2b
g/dscmc
g/dscm @ 7% O2d
Emission Rate:
Ib/hr6
kg/h/
R-M29-O-3
8/29/97
0809-1236
0.0132
0.0400
0.0303
0.0915
3.23
1.46
• Grains per dry standard cubic foot at 68°F and 1 atm.
b Grains per dry standard cubic foot at 68°F and 1 atm adjusted to 7 percent O2.
c Grams per dry standard cubic meter at 20° C and 1 atm.
d Grams per dry standard cubic meter at 20 °C and 1 atm adjusted to 7 percent O2.
' Pounds per hour.
f Kilograms per hour.
2-36
-------
TABLE 2.25
METALS CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES
ROTARY DRUM DRYER - BAGHOUSE OUTLET
ASPHALT PRODUCTION WITHOUT RAP
ASPHALT PLANT "B" - CARY, NC
Run Number
Date
Clock Time, 24-hr Clock
Antimony (Sb)
^g/dscm"
^g/dscm @ 7% O2b
g/hr*
Arsenic (As)
^g/dscm"
lug/dscm @ 7% O2b
g/hf
Barium (Ba)
^g/dscma
^g/dscm @ 7% O2b
g/hr*
Beryllium (Be)
/ug/dscm8
Aig/dscm @ 7% O2b
g/hi*
Cadmium (Cd)
^g/dscma
Aig/dscm @ 7% O2b
g^ir1
Total Chromium (Cr)
^g/dscm"
^g/dscm @ 7% O2b
g/hi*
Cobalt (Co)
^g/dscm"
A^g/dscm @ 7% O2b
g^ir1
Copper (Cu)
/^g/dscm*
A^g/dscm @ 7% O2b
g/hr6
Lead (Pb)
^g/dscm*
Mg/dscm @ 7% O2b
gAir6
R-M29-O-3
8/29/97
0809-1236
0.671
2.03
0.0324
ND
ND
ND
12.0
36.2
0.579
ND
ND
ND
0.0336
0.102
0.00162
2.16
6.53
0.104
ND
ND
ND
2.57
7.77
0.124
1.04
3.16
0.0505
2-37
-------
TABLE 2.25 (Concluded)
METALS CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES
ROTARY DRUM DRYER - BAGHOUSE OUTLET
ASPHALT PRODUCTION WITHOUT RAP
ASPHALT PLANT "B" - CARY, NC
Run Number
Manganese (Mn)
A
-------
3.0 PROCESS DESCRIPTION
The Asphalt Plant "B" production facility in Gary, North Carolina, has been in operation
since 1987. It is a parallel flow, continuous drum mix process. The dryer/mixer is an ASTEC
drum (8 ft. by 45 ft.), with a rated capacity of 325 tons per hour. The plant has the capability of
producing up to 14 asphalt mix types, with or without the use of RAP.
Asphalt concrete, called "hot mix asphalt" (HMA) by the industry, is a mixture of well-
graded, high quality virgin aggregate that is heated and mixed with liquid asphalt cement to
produce paving material. The characteristics of the asphalt concrete are determined by the
relative amounts and types of aggregate (and RAP) used. In the asphalt reclamation process, old
asphalt pavement is removed from the road surface, transported to the plant, then crushed and
screened to the appropriate size for further processing.
In the parallel flow continuous drum mix process, virgin aggregate of various sizes is fed
to the drum by cold feed controls in proportions dictated by the final mix specifications.
Aggregate is delivered by conveyor belt to the dryer section of the drum, entering at the same
end as the burner (hence, the descriptor "parallel" flow). The aggregate is heated and dried by
the high temperatures in the dryer and then moves into the mixer section where it is coated with
liquid asphalt cement, and conditioner (if used). Liquid asphalt cement and conditioner are
delivered to the mixer by a variable flow pump that is electronically linked to the aggregate feed
weigh scales. The hot aggregate mixture is also combined with RAP (if any) and recycled dust
from the control system. The resulting asphalt concrete mixture is discharged from the end of
the drum mixer and conveyed to storage silos for delivery to trucks. Refer to Figure 1.2 for a
simplified process schematic.
There are six cold storage bins and three hot mix storage silos at the facility. The hot mix
storage silo capacities are 200 tons each, for a total of 600 tons. There are two screens for
aggregate sizing and two 25,000 gallon heated asphalt cement storage vessels, for a total asphalt
cement capacity of 50,000 gallons (125 tons). The plant usually uses natural gas for all its
process fuel needs; however, during the source tests No. 2 oil, the back-up fuel, was used in the
drum mixer. The amount of energy needed from the fuel for the asphalt production process is
300,000 BTU per ton of asphalt produced. The hot gas contact time, i.e., the time from when the
aggregate enters the dryer to when it exits the coater, is approximately 3 to 4 minutes. Surface
mixes are closer to 3 minutes and base mixes are closer to 4 minutes.
The facility used an asphalt cement (AC) called AC-20, obtained from Citgo of
Wilmington, North Carolina. An anti-strip conditioner, called Ad-Here® (from Arr-Maz®), is
sometimes used; anti-strip is required for all North Carolina Department of Transportation jobs.
3-1
-------
For particulate matter (PM) control, the facility uses a knockout box as a primary control
and a fabric filter as a secondary control. The fabric filter is an ASTEC Pulse-Jet, equipped with
780 14-ounce Nomex bags; it is operated with an air-to-cloth ratio of approximately 5 feet per
minute. The process gas exits the drum and proceeds through the knockout box into a fabric
filter, where it is exhausted through a stack. As mentioned above, the dust collected by the PM
control devices is recycled to process.
EPA source tests were performed at the facility on August 27, 28, and 29, 1997. The
source testing took place at the inlet and outlet of the fabric filter. Data were taken at 15-minute
intervals during the entire "test period," i.e., the time period when at least one manual and both
instrumental tests were running. According to plant personnel, the plant was operating under
normal conditions during the tests.
For the three test dates (August 27, 28, and 29, 1997), the average asphalt concrete
production rates per test run were 201, 199, and 163 tons per hour (tph), respectively,
corresponding to total production of 1,039, 1,241, and 839 tons. During the first two test runs
(August 27 and 28), a surface asphalt coating that included RAP was produced; during the third
test run (August 29), a surface coating (accounting for 73% of the total asphalt concrete
produced) and a binder coating (accounting for 27% of total production) were produced, both
without RAP. A high sulfur No. 2 fuel oil was used for fuel in the production process during the
tests. No conditioner was used during the tests.
Table 3.1 summarizes the operating conditions observed during the EPA source test
periods at Asphalt Plant "B". Tables 3.2 and 3.3 describe the asphalt mixes produced and the
fuel used, respectively, during the tests. Table 3.4 describes the specifics of plant operation
during the tests. Appendix A shows all the data recorded during the tests, along with the results
of statistical analyses.
3-2
-------
TABLE 3.1
PLANT OPERATING CONDITIONS
ASPHALT PLANT "B" - CARY, NC
Process Data
Product Type(s)"
Asphalt Concrete
Production Rate, tph
Averageb
Range
Total Produced, tons
Mix Temperature, °F
Average6
Range
Raw Material (Virgin
Aggregate)
Use Rate, tph
Average11
Range
Total Used, tons
RAP
Use Rate, tph
Average11
Range
Total Used, tons
Asphalt Cement
Use Rate, tph
Average11
Range
Total Used, tons
Conditioner (Ib)
Test Run
R-M23-1
R-M29-1
08/27/97
surface mix, with RAP
(BCSC, RI-2)
201
149-212
1,039
301
290-330
153
113-161
788
36
18-40
197
12.3
9.1-12.9
54
none
R-M23-2
R-M29-2
8/28/97
surface mix, with RAP
(BCSC, RI-2)
199
192-206
1,241
299
284-321
151
145-154
943
36
30-43
235
12.1
11.7-12.6
64
none
R-M23-3
R-M29-3
08/29/97
surface mix, no RAP
(BCSC, 1-2); and binder
(BCBC, Type H)
163
130-195
839
303
286-352
154
122-183
839
none
9.2
6.8-12.1
51
none
3-3
-------
TABLE 3.1 (CONCLUDED)
PLANT OPERATING CONDITIONS
ASPHALT PLANT "B" - CARY, NC
Process Data
Fabric Filter Operation"
Temperature, °F
Inlet
Outlet
Pressure Drop, in. H2O
Average
Range
Fuel
Use Rate,0 gph
Total Used, gal
Test Run
R-M23-1
R-M29-1
08/27/97
344
271
0.9
0.8- 1.2
340
1,906
R-M23-2
R-M29-2
8/28/97
343
283
0.9
0.1 - 1.1
344
2,305
R-M23-3
R-M29-3
08/29/97
325
269
1.2
0.5-2.0
266
1,620
a BCSC, Type 1-2 = bituminous concrete, surface coarse
BCSC, Type RI-2 = bituminous concrete, surface coarse, with RAP
BCBC, Type H = bituminous concrete, binder coarse (type H)
See Table 3.2 for more detail on product specifications.
b As a straight average of the 15-minute interval data shown in Appendix A.
c Fuel use rate was calculated from the total fuel used during the time interval.
3-4
-------
TABLE 3.2
ASPHALT MIX SPECIFICATIONS
ASPHALT PLANT "B" - CARY, NC
Product
Surface Coating
(BCSC, Type 1-2)
Surface Coating, with RAP (BCSC,
Type RI-2)
Binder (BCBC, Type H)
Material
78-M
regular screenings
classified screenings
Total
asphalt cement
78-M
screenings
classified screenings
RAP
Total
Asphalt cement total
additional
from RAP
78-M
#67
regular screenings
wet screenings
Total
asphalt cement
Amount
22% aggregate
34% aggregate
44% aggregate
100% aggregate
6.4% mix
1 7% aggregate
23% aggregate
42% aggregate
18% aggregate
100% aggregate
6.4% mix
5.2% mix
0.9% mix
19% aggregate
48% aggregate
23% aggregate
1 0% aggregate
100% aggregate
4. 6% mix
TABLE 3.3
FUEL SPECIFICATIONS
ASPHALT PLANT"B" - CARY, NC
Fuel Type
High Sulfur, No. 2 Fuel Oil
Characteristics
flashpoint 125°F
sulfur <500
mg/kg
(0.05%)
API index 33.2
Descriptor(s)
dyed diesel fuel not for on-road use
3-5
-------
TABLE 3.4
SPECIFICS OF PLANT OPERATION
ASPHALT PLANT "B" - CARY, NC
Parameter
Test Period
Plant Shut Downs'
(with approximate
duration)
Plant Production Rate
Change(s)
Product Changes
Test Run / Test Date
R-M23-1
R-M29-1
08/27/97
0940-1516
1002 (5min)
1140 (6min)
1402 (10 min)
1115-1145:
mix rate slowed
from nominally
200 to ISOtph
none
R-M23-2
R-M29-2
8/28/97
0746-1428
0901 (8 min)
1110 (18 min)
1355 (12 min)
none
none
R-M23-3
R-M29-3
08/29/97
0809-1413
1212 (9 min)
1242 (42 min)
1007-1222:
mix rate increased
from nominally 1 50
to 200 tph
1237-1422:
mix rate decreased
from nominally 200
to 130tpy
0807-0822 and
1022-1422: 1-2
produced (642 tons)
083 7- 1007: binder
produced (237) tons)
The shutdown at 1242 during Run 3 was put into effect to avoid overfilling of the silos with asphalt
concrete mix; all other shutdowns were due to aggregate clogging in the conveyor system.
3-6
-------
4.0 SAMPLING LOCATIONS
As stated previously, isokinetic sampling was conducted to determine the controlled and
the uncontrolled emissions of the target compounds. Sampling was conducted at the baghouse
inlet just after the knockout box, and at the baghouse outlet, downstream of the ID fan. Detailed
descriptions of the sampling locations, as well as schematic diagrams, follow.
4.1 BAGHOUSE INLET SAMPLING LOCATION
The baghouse inlet consisted of a round horizontal duct which exits the knockout box and
makes a 90° downward bend before it enters the baghouse through the top. The inlet duct
diameter was 50 inches. Since there were no sample ports at the inlet location, sample ports
were installed according the EPA Method 1 specifications. A schematic diagram of the inlet
sampling location is presented in Figure 4.1. Two 4-inch diameter sample ports were installed
on the knockout box exit/baghouse inlet duct, 110 inches (2.20 duct diameters) downstream of
the knockout box exit. The nearest downstream disturbance was the elbow prior to the baghouse
inlet. For this sampling location and geometry, Method 1 specifies a minimum of 24 sample
points in the duct cross-section. Accordingly, PES conducted isokinetic traverses using a 24
point sample matrix, consisting of two 12 point sample traverses. The sample ports were offset
90° to each other and were situated 45° to a vertical line bisecting the horizontal portion of the
duct. Figure 4.2 presents a schematic diagram of the sample traverse points, as well as their
locations inside the duct cross section.
4.2 BAGHOUSE OUTLET SAMPLING LOCATION
The baghouse outlet consisted of a 33-inch x 49 !/2-inch square duct on the outlet of the
baghouse. The equivalent diameter of the exhaust was 39.6 inches. The sample ports were
located 24 inches (0.606 equivalent diameters) upstream of the nearest disturbance, which is the
stack outlet, and 237 inches (5.99 equivalent diameters) downstream of the nearest disturbance,
which is the outlet of the ID fan. For this sampling location and geometry, Method 1 specifies a
minimum of 24 sample points for isokinetic traverses. There are six sample ports installed on the
49 3/4-inch side of the stack, so PES used a 24 point sampling matrix consisting of six four-point
traverses. A schematic diagram of the stack outlet is presented in Figure 4.3, and a schematic of
the sample traverse points are presented in Figure 4.4.
4-1
-------
110'-
SB"
Knockout
Box
A •«— i
I
50"
1
o
^ t "
-5'
J_
T
Baghouse
Figure 4.1 Baghouse Inlet Sampling Location - Asphalt Plant "B", Cary, NC
4-2
-------
Section A
Traverse
Point
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Distance from
inside wall
inches
1.05
3.35
5.90
8.85
12.5
17.8
32.2
37.5
41.2
44.1
46.7
49.0
Figure 4.2 Bagbouse Inlet Point Locations - Asphalt Plant "B", Cary, NC
4-3
-------
B
Baghouse
FAN
T
24"
B
237"
Figure 4.3 Baghouse Outlet Sampling Location - Asphalt Plant MB", Cary, NC
4-4
-------
•33"-
c
tz
c.
1=
1=
t=
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
l_ _ _ _
3
3
i
3
3
4
4
r -----
4
4
r
4
4
Section B
Traverse Distance from
Point Inside wall
Number (inches)
1
2
3
4
4.1
124
20.6
28.9
49-3/4"
Figure 4.4 Baghouse Outlet Point Locations - Asphalt Plant "B", Cary, NC
4-5
-------
-------
5.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PROCEDURES
Table 5.1 summarizes the sources, test parameters, test methods, number of tests, and
planned duration of each event. Sampling of the baghouse inlet and outlet was conducted
simultaneously for PCDDs/PCDFs, and PM/Metals. Brief descriptions of each method follow:
5.1 LOCATION OF MEASUREMENT SITES AND SAMPLE/VELOCITY
TRAVERSE POINTS
EPA Method 1, "Sample and Velocity Traverses for Stationary Sources," was used to
select the measurement sites and to establish velocity and sample traverse point locations. The
measurement sites are discussed in Section 4.0.
5.2 DETERMINATION OF STACK GAS VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE
EPA Method 2, "Determination of Stack Gas Velocity and Volumetric Flow Rate (Type S
Pitot Tube)," was used to determine gas volumetric flow rate at the baghouse inlet and outlet. A
Type S pitot tube, constructed according to Method 2 criteria and having an assigned coefficient
of 0.84, was connected to an inclined-vertical manometer and used to measure velocity pressure.
A Type K thermocouple attached directly to the pitot tube was used to measure gas temperature.
For each sampling run, the gas velocity was calculated from the average of the square roots of the
velocity pressure readings, the average gas temperature, the molecular weight, and the stack static
pressure. The volumetric flow rate was calculated as the product of the average gas velocity and
the duct cross-sectional area.
5.3 DETERMINATION OF DRY MOLECULAR WEIGHT AND EMISSION
CORRECTION FACTORS
EPA Method 3B, "Gas Analysis for the Determination of Emission Rate Correction
Factor or Excess Air," was used to measure carbon dioxide and oxygen content of the stack
gases. Gas samples were extracted from each stack using the integrated, multi-point bag
sampling technique. The bag contents were analyzed onsite within four hours after sample
collection using an Orsat® analyzer to determine % concentrations of carbon dioxide and oxygen.
The Orsat® analyzer had 0.2 % subdivisions.
5-1
-------
TABLE 5.1
SAMPLING LOCATIONS, TEST PARAMETERS
AND TEST METHODS SUMMARY
ASPHALT PLANT MB" - GARY, NC
Sampling Location
Baghouse Inlet
Baghouse Outlet
Parameter
Flow Rate
O2/CO2
Moisture
PCDDs/PCDFs
PM/Metals
Flow Rate
02/CO2
Moisture
PCDDs/PCDFs
PM/Metals
Test
Methods
EPA 1 & 2
EPA3B
EPA 4
EPA 23
EPA 29
EPA 1 & 2
EPA3B
EPA 4
EPA 23
EPA 29
No. of
Tests
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
Net Run Time,
Minutes*
96, 200, 240
87, 200, 240
96, 200, 240
96,170,240
87, 200, 240
240, 240, 240
240, 240, 240
240, 240, 240
240, 240, 240
240, 240, 240
" Net run times presented are for the first, second, and third sampling runs, respectively
5.4 DETERMINATION OF STACK GAS MOISTURE CONTENT
EPA Method 4, "Determination of Moisture Content in Stack Gases," was used to
determine gas moisture content. The quantity of condensate collected during each sampling run
was determined gravimetrically as the difference of the pre- and post-test impinger weights. The
gas moisture volume was then calculated as the ratio of the moisture volume (assuming a
conversion factor of 0.0415 g/ft3) to the sum of the moisture volume and the dry gas volume as
indicated by the dry gas meter. The Method 4 procedure was conducted simultaneously with
each Method 23 and Method 29 sampling run. The moisture gained in the XAD® module in the
Method 23 sample train was also determined.
5.5 DETERMINATION OF POLYCHLORINATED DIBENZO-P-DIOXINS AND
POLYCHLORINATED DIBENZOFURANS
EPA Method 23, "Determination of Polychlorinated Dibenzo-p-Dioxins and
Polychlorinated Dibenzofurans From Stationary Sources" was used to determine PCDDs and
PCDFs at the baghouse inlet and outlet. A schematic of the Method 23 sampling train is shown
in Figure 5.1. Gas samples were extracted from the gas streams isokinetically, and passed
through a glass nozzle, heated glass-lined sample probe, a heated glass fiber filter, a coil
condenser and a sorbent resin trap containing approximately 40 grams of spiked XAD®-2 sorbent
resin. Ice water from the impinger bath was continuously recirculated through water jackets on
the coil condenser and the XAD®-2 sorbent resin trap to cool the sample gas and facilitate
5-2
-------
tempirttur*
•tnior
Figure 5.1 Method 23 Sample Train Schematic - Asphalt Plant "B", Gary, NC
5-3
-------
absorption of PCDDs and PCDFs onto the XAD®-2 resin. At the conclusion of each sample run,
the sample train components (except the sorbent trap) were rinsed the with pesticide-grade
acetone and toluene.
Upon receipt by the subcontract laboratory, which was TLI, the samples were
concentrated, combined, and analyzed using a gas chromatograph with a mass spectrometer
detector (GC/MS). Sample aliquots were initially separated using a DB-5 capillary column;
where the results of the analyses using the DB-5 column indicated the presence of 2378 PCDFs,
the sample was re-analyzed using a DB-225 capillary column, and the results of the DB-225
analysis used for the subsequent calculations of emission rate and toxic equivalency for the 2378
PCDFs congener.
5.6 DETERMINATION OF PARTICULATE MATTER AND METALS
EPA Method 29, "Determination of Metals Emissions From Stationary Sources," was
used to determine filterable particulate matter and metals at the baghouse inlet and baghouse
outlet locations. The target metals included: antimony (Sb), arsenic (As), barium (Ba),
beryllium (Be), cadmium (Cd), chromium (Cr), cobalt (Co), copper (Cu), lead (Pb), manganese
(Mn), mercury (Hg), nickel (Ni), phosphorus (P), silver (Ag), selenium (Se), thallium (Tl), and
zinc (Zn). A Method 29 sampling train schematic is presented in Figure 5.2. Gas samples were
withdrawn from the gas streams isokinetically and through a glass nozzle, heated glass-lined
sample probe, a heated quartz fiber filter, and an impinger train containing reagents for the
absorption of metals. The first impinger in the train was empty, the second and third impingers
each contained 100 ml of a 5% nitric acid (HNO3)/10% hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) solution, the
fourth impinger was empty, the fifth and sixth impingers each contained 100 ml of a 4 %
potassium permanganate (KMnO4)/10% sulfuric acid (H2SO4) solution, and the last impinger
contained a known quantity of silica gel.
The sample analysis scheme for metals is shown in Figures 5.3 and 5.4. At the
conclusion of each sampling run, the front half of the sampling train (i.e., in front of the tared
quartz fiber filter) was rinsed with acetone followed by a solution of 0.1 N HNO3. The first three
impingers were quantitatively recovered and rinsed with 100 ml of HNO3 solution; the impinger
contents and the rinses were collected in a pre-cleaned glass sample bottle. The contents of the
fourth and fifth impingers were recovered and impingers rinsed with 100 ml of fresh acidified
potassium permanganate solution, followed by a rinse with 100 ml of deionized water into a pre-
cleaned glass sample bottle. The fourth and fifth impingers were then rinsed with 25 ml of 8 N
HC1 solution, which was collected in pre-cleaned glass sample jar containing 200 ml of
deionized water.
Analyses for the determination of particulate matter concentrations and emission rates
were conducted at PES facilities in Research Triangle Park, NC. The acetone probe rinses and
the filters were transferred to pre-cleaned, tared beakers, evaporated to dryness, desiccated, and
weighed to constant weight. At the conclusion of the particulate matter analysis, the beakers
were sealed with Parafilm® and transported to the subcontract laboratory, Triangle Laboratories,
Inc., for determination of the target metals content. Each sample run generated two fractions for
5-4
-------
Thermometer
Glass Filter Holder
Thermometer
Glass Probe Liner
Glass Probe Tip
Pitot Manometer
Empty (Optional)
5% HNO3/10% H2O2
Silica Gel
4% KMnO4/10% H2SO4
Orifice
Vacuum Gauge
Air-tight
Dry Gas Pump
Meter
Figure 5.2 Method 29 Sample Train Schematic - Asphalt Plant "B", Cary, NC
-------
o\
Probe Liner
and Nozzle
Rinse with
acetone
Brush liner
with nonmetallic
brush & rinse
with acetone
Check liner to see
if participate
removed; if not,
repeat step above
Rinse three
times with
0.1N HNO3
Front Half of
Filter Housing
Brush with
nonmetallic brush
and rinse with
acetone
"1
Rinse three
times with
0.1N HNO3
Filter
Carefully
remove filter
from support
with Teflon-
coated tweezers
and place in
petri dish
Brush loose
participate
onto filter
Seal petri dish
with tape
Filter Support
and Back Half
of Filter Housing
Rinse three
times with
0.1N HNO3
1st Impinger
(Empty at
beginning
of test)
Measure
impinger
contents
Empty the
contents into
container
Rinse three
times with
0.1N HNO3
2nd & 3rd
Impingers
(HNO3/H2O2)
Measure
impinger
contents
Empty the
contents into
container
Rinse three
times with
0.1N HNO3
FH
(3)'
AR
(2)
F
(D
BH
(4)
• Number in parentheses indicates container number
Figure 5.3 Method 29 Sample Recovery Scheme (Sample Fractions 1-4)
Asphalt Plant "B", Cary, NC
-------
4th Impinger
(Empty) & 5th
and 6th impingers
(Acidified KMnO4)
Measure
impinger
contents
Last Impinger
Empty the
impinger No. 4
contents into
container
Rinse with
100 ml
0.1N HNO3
Empty the
impingers
Nos. 5 & 6
contents into
container
!
Rinse three
times with
permanganate
reagent, then
with water
Weigh for
moisture
Discard
Remove any
residue with
25 ml 8N
HCI solution
O 1N HNO3
(5A)
KMnO4
(SB)
8N HCI
(5C)
Figure 5.4 Method 29 Sample Recovery Scheme (Sample Fraction 5)
Asphalt Plant "B", Gary, NC
5-7
-------
the analysis of all target metals except mercury, and five fractions for analysis of mercury.
Except for mercury, analyses of the target metals were conducted using the analytical method
which resulted in the lowest detection for each metal; either graphite furnace atomic absorption
spectroscopy (GFAAS), or inductively coupled argon plasma (ICP) emission spectroscopy.
Analysis for mercury content was determined using cold vapor atomic absorption spectroscopy
(CVAAS).
5.7 DETERMINATION OF PLUME OPACITY
EPA Method 9, "Visual Determination of the Opacity of Emissions from Stationary
Sources" was used to quantify visible emissions from the baghouse outlet stack. The observer
was certified to read plume opacities at a field training session held hi Raleigh, North Carolina by
Eastern Technical Associates of Raleigh, North Carolina on March 12,1997 (Certificate No.
257158).
5-8
-------
6.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL
PROCEDURES AND RESULTS
This section describes the specific QA/QC procedures employed by PES during the
performance of this source testing program. PES' quality assurance program was based upon the
procedures and guidelines contained in the "Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution
Measurement Systems, Volume III, Stationary Source Specific Methods," EPA/600/R-94/038c,
as well as in the test methods to ensure the collection, analysis, and reporting of reliable source
test data.
6.1 CALIBRATION OF APPARATUS
Since no mechanism exists for an independent measurement of emissions from the
source, careful preparation, checkout, and calibration of the source testing sampling and analysis
equipment is essential to ensure the collection of data of high quality. PES maintains a
comprehensive schedule for preventative maintenance, calibration, and preparation of the source
testing equipment.
6.1.1 Barometers
PES used aneroid barometers which were calibrated against a station pressure value
reported by a nearby National Weather Service Station, and corrected for elevation.
6.1.2 Temperature Sensors
The responses of the Type K thermocouples used in the field testing program were
checked using Calibration Procedure 2e as described in the Quality Assurance Handbook. The
response of each temperature sensor was recorded when immersed in an ice water bath, at
ambient temperature, and in a boiling water bath; each response was checked against an ASTM
3F reference thermometer. Table 6.1 summarizes the results of the thermocouple calibrations
and the acceptable levels of variance. Digital temperature readouts were calibrated using a
thermocouple simulator having a range of 0-2400°F.
6.1.3 Pitot Tubes
For the measurement of velocity pressure in the gas streams, PES used Type S pilot tubes
constructed according to EPA Method 2 specifications. Pitot tubes meeting these geometric
specifications are assigned a baseline pitot coefficient (Cp) of 0.84 and need not be subjected to a
wind tunnel calibration. PES performs, at a minimum, annual calibration checks of pilots using
Calibration Procedure 2 as found in the Quality Assurance Handbook.
6-1
-------
TABLE 6.1
SUMMARY OF TEMPERATURE SENSOR CALIBRATION DATA
ASPHALT PLANT MB" - CARY, NC
Temp.
Sensor
I.D.
5C
5B
RT3
RT20
RT11
SH4
Usage
Stack Gas
Stack Gas
Stack Gas
Stack Gas
Impinger
Exit
Impinger
Exit
Temperature, °R
Reference
498
562
628
496
553
596
501
532
670
492
534
672
496
532
670
497
532
670
Sensor
498
561
629
499
559
596
501
532
672
493
532
671
495
534
670
496
535
669
Absolute
Difference
%
0
0.17
0.16
0.60
1.0
0
0
0
0.30
0.20
0.37
0.15
0.20
0.37
0
0.20
0.56
0.15
EPA
Criteria
%
<±1.5
<±1.5
<±1.5
<±1.5
<±1.5
<±1.5
<±1.5
<±1.5
<±1.5
<±1.5
<±1.5
<±1.5
-------
The results of the dimensional checks for each pilot tube used in this test program are
summarized in Table 6.2.
6.1.4 Differential Pressure Gauges
PES uses Dwyer inclined/vertical manometers to measure differential pressures. These
include velocity pressure, static pressure, and meter orifice pressure. Manometers are selected
with sufficient sensitivity to accurately measure pressures over the entire range of expected
values. Manometers are primary standards and require no calibration.
6.1.5 Dry Gas Meter and Orifice
The Method 23 and 29 dry gas meters and orifices were calibrated in accordance with
Calibration Procedure 5 in the Quality Assurance Handbook. This procedure involves direct
comparison of the dry gas meter to a reference dry test meter. The reference dry test meter is
calibrated annually against a wet test meter. Before its initial use in the field, the metering
system was calibrated at several flow rates over the normal operating range of the metering
system. For the initial calibration to be considered valid, the results of individual meter
calibration factors (y), cannot differ from the average by more than 0.02, and the results of
individual meter orifice factors (AH@),cannot differ from the average by more that 0.20. After
field use, the metering system calibration was checked at the average flow rate and highest
vacuum observed during the test period. The results of the post-test meter correction factor
check cannot differ by more than 5 % from the average meter correction factor obtained during
the initial, or thereafter, the annual calibration. Table 6.3 presents the results of the dry gas meter
and orifice calibrations.
6.2 ON-SITE MEASUREMENTS
The on-site QA/QC activities include:
6.2.1 Measurement Sites
Prior to sampling, the stacks were checked dimensionally to determine the suitability of
the measurement site locations with respect to the Method 1 criteria. Distances to upstream and
downstream disturbances, test port locations and inside stack dimensions were checked to
evaluate the uniformity of the stack cross sectional area. The inside stack dimensions, stack wall
thickness, and sample port lengths were measured to the nearest 1/16 inch.
6-3
-------
TABLE 6.2
SUMMARY OF PITOT TUBE DIMENSIONAL DATA
ASPHALT PLANT "B" - CARY, NC
Measurement
a,
a2
P,
P2
Y
e
A
Z = A tan Y
W = A tan 6
Dt
A/2D,
Criteria
-10° < a, < 10°
-10° < a, < 10°
-5° < p, < 5°°
-5° < p, * 5°
-
-
-
< 0.125 in.
< 0.03 125 in.
0.1875"
-------
TABLE 6.3
SUMMARY OF DRY GAS METER AND ORIFICE CALIBRATION DATA
ASPHALT PLANT "B" - CARY, NC
Meter
Box
No.
M5-4
M5-9
MB- 11
MB- 10
Dry Gas Meter Correction Factor (y)
Pre-
test
1.021
1.016
0.987
0.965
Post-test
1.046
1.016
1.008
0.979
% Diff.
2.5
0.0
2.1
1.5
EPA Criteria
<5%
<5%
<5%
<5%
Meter Orifice Coefficient (AH«g)
Average
1.82
1.78
1.93
1.75
Range
1.74-1.87
1.71-1.82
1.73-2.13
1.68-1.82
EPA
Criteria
1.62-2.02
1.59-1.98
1.87-1.97
1.55-1.95
6.2.2 Velocity Measurements
All velocity measurement apparatus were assembled, leveled, zeroed, and leak-checked
prior to and at the end of each sampling run. The stack static pressure was determined at a single
point within the stack corresponding to the average velocity pressure as obtained during the pre-
test velocity traverse.
6.2.3 Flue Gas Sampling
Integrated flue gas samples were collected in Tedlar® gas bags from the baghouse
exhaust. Prior to their initial use, the bags were leak checked and purged with nitrogen to ensure
cleanliness. Prior to and after completion of each sampling run, the stack gas molecular weight
sampling system was leak checked. The bag samples were analyzed on-site using an Orsat®
analyzer. Prior to use the Orsat® analyzer was assembled and replenished with fresh reagents
and leak checked as per the manufacturer's procedures.
6.2.4 Moisture
During sampling, the exit gas temperature of the last impinger in each sampling train was
maintained below 68°F to ensure condensation of stack gas water vapor. The moisture gain in
the impinger train due to flue gas moisture was determined gravimetrically using a digital top-
loading electronic balance with a resolution of 0.1 g. For subsequent calculations of the flue gas
moisture volume, the calculated moisture volume due to the impinger weight gain is compared to
the stack gas saturation volume at the average stack gas temperatures. If the calculated moisture
volume due to impinger weight gain exceeds the saturation volume, the assumption is made that
moisture droplets entered the sampling system, and the saturation volume is used to calculate
stack gas molecular weight. The lower moisture value obtained using the reference method and
saturation method was subsequently used in all Method 23 and Method 29 calculations.
6-5
-------
6.2.5 Method 23/Method 29
The QA/QC activities for the for Method 23 and Method 29 sampling trains were similar.
Prior to field testing, all glassware used was pre-cleaned according to the guidelines presented in
Method 23 and 29. The Method 23 glassware was cleaned based upon procedures presented in
Section 3 A of "The Manual of Analytical Methods for the Analysis of Pesticides in Human and
Environmental Samples." The Method 29 sampling train glassware was prepared by first rinsing
with hot tap and then water and then washed in hot soapy water. Next, all glassware was rinsed
three times with tap water, followed by three additional rinses with water. Then all glassware
was soaked in a 10% (V/V) nitric acid solution for a minimum of four hours, rinsed three times
with water, then rinsed a final time with acetone, and allowed to air dry. On all of the Method 23
and Method 29 glassware, openings where contamination could occur was covered with
Parafilm® or Teflon® tape until the trains were assembled for sampling.
Table 6.4 summarizes the results of the post-test sample train leak checks for the Method
23 and Method 29 sampling trains, as well as the isokinetic sampling ratios for each of the
sampling runs attempts. It should be noted that the Method 23 and Method 29 sampling runs at
the baghouse inlet were aborted after approximately 20 minutes of sampling. Although the
Method 29 isokinetic sampling ratio was within the required tolerance, the Method 23 ratio was
not. This was due to the significant pressure drop across the train from the collected particulate
matter and the XAD®-2 sorbent resin trap, which made it impossible to collect a gas sample at
the flow rate required by the isokinetic rate equation. All pre- and post-test sample train leaks
met the acceptance criteria.
In order to evaluate the effectiveness of the on-site cleanup procedures, field blank
samples of the Method 23 and Method 29 sample trains were collected during the field test
program. The sample trains were assembled in same manner as the trains prepared for actual
sampling runs, and were transported to the baghouse outlet sampling location. The sample trains
were each leak-checked and allowed to heat to the normal operating temperature. They were
then leak-checked again, and transported to the on-site field laboratory for recovery. The
samples generated from the field blank trains were handled and analyzed in the same manner as
the other samples generated during actual test runs.
In order to evaluate contamination levels in the sampling reagents, blank samples of all
reagents used for both the Method 23 and Method 29 sampling were collected. These sample
blanks were submitted for analysis along with the run samples and field blank samples for
analysis.
6.3 ANALYSES
6.3.1 Method 23 Analyses
Table 6.5 presents the results of the recovery efficiencies for the internal, surrogate, and
alternate standards used in conjunction with Method 23. Internal standards are used during
analysis to quantify the ability of the analytical technique to quantify the target PCDDs/PCDFs
6-6
-------
TABLE 6.4
SUMMARY OF METHOD 237 METHOD 29 FIELD SAMPLING QA/QC DATA
ASPHALT PLANT "B" - GARY, NC
Date
8/27/97
8/28/97
8/29/97
Site
Inlet
Outlet
Inlet
Outlet
Inlet
Outlet
Run No.
R-I-M23-1
R-I-M29-1
R-0-M23-1
R-O-M29-1
R-I-M23-2
R-I-M29-2
R-O-M23-2
R-O-M29-2
R-I-M23-3
R-I-M29-3
R-O-M23-3
R-0-M29-3
Pre-Test
Leak Rate
acfm
0.008
0.011
0.003
0.007
0.008
0.003
0.001
0.011
0.006
0.004
0.004
0.012
Post-Test
Leak Rate
acfm
0.007
0.001
0.002
0.004
0.002
0.012
0.008
0.005
0.009
0.012
0.003
0.009
EPA
Criteria
< 0.02
< 0.02
< 0.02
< 0.02
< 0.02
< 0.02
< 0.02
< 0.02
< 0.02
< 0.02
< 0.02
< 0.02
Percent
Isokinetic
115.0%
109.7%
115.5%
109.5%
102.6%
100.5%
100.5%
99.2%
97.7%
96.1%
99.6%
97.8%
EPA
Criteria
90%-110%
90%-110%
90%-110%
90%-110%
90%-110%
90%-110%
90%-110%
90%-110%
90%-110%
90%-110%
90%-110%
90%-110%
6-7
-------
TABLE 6.5
SUMMARY OF METHOD 23 STANDARDS RECOVERY EFFICIENCIES
ASPHALT PLANT "B" - CARY, NC
FULL SCREEN
ANALYSIS
Internal Standards
2,3,7,8-TCDF
2,3,7,8-TCDD
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OCDD
Surroeate Standards
2,3,7,8-TCDD
2.3,4,7,8-PeCDF
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
Alternate Standards
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
CONFIRMATION
ANALYSIS
Internal Standards
237 8-TCDF
Percent Recovery
TLI
XAD-2
Blank
105
74.6
944
101
73.5
83.2
640
71.5
73 1
94.6
101
87.3
81.6
78.6
694
73.3
674
M23-
RB
68.5
61.5
675
69.2
756
69.2
60.9
66.8
60.2
105
950
89.0
877
978
758
79.3
NA
R-M23
-O-l
137
145
160
177
124
122
91.2
885
60.5
79.3
71 8
73 8
64.4
78.7
74.3
92.3
NA
R-M23
-0-2
88.1
90.2
82.1
102
81.0
77.6
47.2
53.2
29.8
100
93.1
94.3
856
116
58.2
737
NA
R-M23
-O-3
114
95.4
91.9
100
103
92.2
64.7
63.8
31.6
101
93.4
85.0
832
86.7
84.8
94.6
NA
R-M23
-O-FB
757
71.5
75.4
86.9
81.3
76.5
75.9
87.9
87.6
95.6
894
83.1
72.6
67.8
69.7
81.5
70.9
R-M23
-1-1
72.8
73.3
50.6
45.4
65.4
70.9
560
59.6
55.8
102
921
117
89.9
110
80.6
76.4
NA
R-M23-
1-2
45.4
50.6
36.1
35.5
56.9
49.5
32.2
30.0
17.5
102
87.4
100
90.2
84.3
49.8
53.8
NA
R-M23
-1-3
63.3
58.5
56.9
57.2
64.5
58.0
35.3
29.8
16.0
103
93.4
112
99.8
75.7
54.2
73.5
53.9
QC
1 itnitc
LJH1I15
40-130%
40-130%
40-130%
40-130%
40-130%
40-130%
25-130%
25-130%
25-130%
70-140%
70-140%
70-140%
70-140%
70-140%
40-130%
40-130%
40-130%
NA Confirmation analysis was not necessary on samples where no TCDF were detected in the full screen analysis.
6-8
-------
congeners. An internal standard mixture consisting of known amounts of nine congeners was
added to each of the analyzed samples during quantification. Recovery efficiencies for OCDD
were less than the minimum recovery efficiency of 25% for the samples collected during runs R-
M23-I-2 and R-M23-I-3. OCDD internal standard recoveries for these two samples were 17.5
and 16.0 percent, respectively.
Surrogate standards are a mixture of congeners that are spiked onto the sorbent resin
during packing of the traps, and provide an indication of the collection efficiency of the resin
during the sampling runs. Recoveries of all surrogate standards were within the prescribed
limitations for all runs except for the field blank sample for 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 Hepta-chlorinated
dibenzo-furan. The recovery efficiency was 67.8 percent, and the minimum required for QA
validation was 70 percent. Recoveries of alternate standards and internal standards during
confirmation analysis (when required) were all within the QA ranges.
6.3.2 Method 29 Analyses
The results of QA analyses for the Method 29 samples are presented in Tables 6.6
through Tables 6.13. Lab control spikes (Table 6.6) were within the recovery limits for all
metals except nickel, with a recovery of 131%, and thallium, with a recovery of 73%. The
control limits for lab control spikes are 80 to 120%. The sample results should be considered
biased high for Ni and biased low for Tl. A matrix spike (Table 6.7) was conducted on the
sample from Run R-M29-O-1. Matrix spikes are conducted to evaluate if the sample matrix
contains an unknown compound which interferes with the quantification of one or more of the
target metals. Matrix spike recoveries for the front half of the sample were low for cobalt, which
may indicate that the results of the front half analyses for cobalt may be biased low. Matrix spike
recoveries for the back-half fractions were within the qualification criteria for all metals. Table
6.8 summarizes the Method 29 serial dilution analysis QC data for Run R-M29-O-1. Except for
the front half chromium analysis, the relative percent deviation (RPD) was <10% for all the
metals. The serial dilution results for Cr demonstrated a RPD outside the QC control criteria of
10.0%, which indicates the presence of an amount of interferents specific to this analyte in the
native sample matrix. This sample should be considered biased low for Cr due to matrix
interference. Table 6.9 summarizes the Method 29 duplicate analysis QC data for Run
R-M29-O-2. With the exception of lead in the front half fraction, the duplicate analysis QC
results were within the RPD limit of ±20%. Table 6.10 presents the results of the method blank.
All analytes found in the method blank were detected at a level equal to or less than the
Reporting Detection Limits (RDLs) except for Ni. The Ni results should be considered biased
high. Table 6.11 summarizes the Method 29 field and reagent blank analysis QC data. The field
blank was collected during the field sampling portion of the test program and is used as an
indicator of background contamination in the ambient air at the sampling site. The reagent
blanks were analyzed for the target metals and the results were used to correct the sample results.
Table 6.12 presents the results of the Method 29 matrix spikes for mercury. The pre-
digestion spike and the pre-digestion spike duplicate for Hg for several of the samples
demonstrated percent recoveries outside the QC criteria, which may indicate significant matrix
effects specific to this analyte in the native sample matrix. Table 6.13 presents the results of the
6-9
-------
mercury analysis of the field blank sample. The results of the analysis for mercury were below
the detection limit for all fractions.
6-10
-------
TABLE 6.6
SUMMARY OF METHOD 29 ANALYSIS QC DATA
LAB CONTROL SPIKES
ASPHALT PLANT"B" - CARY, NC
Analyte
Ag
As
Ba
Be
Cd
Co
Cr
Cu
Mn
Ni
P
Pb
Sb
Se
Tl
Zn
Spike
AmountjAig)
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
1000
50
50
50
50
200
Recovered
Amount (/ug)
42.95
44.95
46.80
45.78
46.59
46.65
47.19
47.89
47.50
65.43
908.82
45.94
46.51
46.39
36.40
194.41
Recovery (%)
86
90
94
92
93
93
94
96
95
131
91
92
93
93
73
97
6-11
-------
TABLE 6.7
SUMMARY OF METHOD 29 ANALYSIS QC DATA
POST DIGESTION MATRIX SPIKES RUN NO. R-M29-O-1
ASPHALT PLANT"B"- GARY, NC
Analyte
•Ag
As
Ba
Be
Cd
Co
Cr
Cu
Mn
Ni
P
Pb
Sb
Se
Tl
Zn
Front Half
Recovered
Amount (Mg/L)
42.33
47.28
575.52
44.63
43.53
17.32
172.26
118.97
709.59
105.88
1391.02
75.53
95.35
85.76
20.40
397.21
Recovery (%)
80
95
LS
89
87
35
93
95
LS
94
89
90
114
78
82
92
Back Half
Recovered
Amount (^g/L)
42.65
42.89
58.97
46.31
51.82
47.41
52.63
68.63
63.17
79.71
1419.02
96.36
45.56
50.52
21.90
389.40
Recovery (%)
83
86
101
93
95
95
94
96
82
94
86
89
91
83
88
86
LS Low spike; % Recovery is not considered valid when spike amount is less than 20% of recovered amount
6-12
-------
TABLE 6.8
METHOD 29 SERIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS QC DATA RUN NO. R-M29-O-1
ASPHALT PLANT "B" - GARY, NC
Analyte
Ag
As
Ba
Be
Cd
Co
Cr
Cu
Mn
Ni
P
Pb
Sb
Se
Tl
Zn
Front Half
Sample
0"g)
0.241
<0.500
54.0
<0.1 00
<0.100
O.I 00
12.6
7.13
67.7
5.91
50.6
3.07
3.84
4.67
O.200
21.4
Serial
Dilution
(MS)
<0.500
<2.50
55.9
0.500
O.500
O.500
16.3
7.10
72.1
6.66
55.1
3.80
5.76
5.44
<1.00
23.4
RPD
(%)
-------
TABLE 6.9
METHOD 29 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS QC ANALYSIS DATA RUN NO. R-M29-O-2
ASPHALT PLANT WB" - CARY, NC
Analyte
Ag
As
Ba
Be
Cd
Co
Cr
Cu
Mn
Ni
P
Pb
Sb
Se
Tl
Zn
Front Half
Sample
(MR)
0.215
<0.500
40.2
O.100
0.174
<0.100
10.5
5.73
63.3
5.02
46.4
2.41
3.85
3.75
<0.20
18.3
Duplicate
(MR)
0.219
O.500
40.1
O.100
O.100
<0.100
10.5
5.81
63.0
5.01
44.5
2.14
3.30
3.99
N/A
18.1
RPD
(%)
-------
TABLE 6.10
METHOD 29 METHOD BLANK ANALYSIS QC DATA
ASPHALT PLANT "B" - GARY, NC
Analyte
Ag
As
Ba
Be
Cd
Co
Cr
Cu
Mn
Ni
P
Pb
Sb
Se
Tl
Zn
Reporting
Detection
Limit (Aig/L)
1
5
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
3
30
2
4
3
2
12
Recovered
Amount (ug/L)
-0.31
-0.83
0.08
-0.01
0.03
-0.32
0.26
0.73
0.39
10.14
-5.19
0.71
-0.06
0.50
-1.30
2.79
Pass or Fail*
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Fail
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Method Blank considered "Pass" when recovered amount is less than the detection limit
6-15
-------
TABLE 6.11
METHOD 29 FIELD AND REAGENT BLANK ANALYSIS QC DATA
ASPHALT PLANT "B" - CARY, NC
Analyte
Ag
As
Ba
Be
Cd
Co
Cr
Cu
Mn
Ni
P
Pb
Sb
Se
Tl
Zn
Field Blank
Front HalfJ,ug^
0.155
O.500
12.4
O.100
<0.1 00
0.100
10.7
4.65
37.7
4.88
28.9
O.200
4.77
4.18
O.200
10.1
Back Half (/;g)
0.205
O.500
O.200
O.I 00
O.I 00
O.I 00
O.200
0.256
0.456
0.582
<3.00
0.393
O.400
O.300
O.200
1.26
Reagent Blank
Front HalfGug)
0.270
O.500
4.33
0.100
0.100
O.I 00
9.33
1.06
0.911
4.68
<3.00
O.200
4.18
4.35
O.200
2.60
Back Half Gug)
O.I 00
O.500
0.326
O.I 00
O.I 00
O.I 00
0.222
1.44
34.7
0.606
55.3
0.265
O.400
O.300
O.200
2.03
Note: Method 29 reagents were prepared from the same lots for the testing conducted on the parallel flow
drier and the counter flow drier, therefore, only one set of reagent blanks were submitted for analysis.
Reprints of the reagent blank analysis results are presented in Appendix C.2, These reagent blanks were
submitted along with the samples collected during testing on the counter flow drier.
6-16
-------
TABLE 6.12
METHOD 29 MERCURY SPIKE ANALYSIS QC DATA
ASPHALT PLANT "B" - CARY, NC
Sample ID
Lab Control Spikes
LCS1
LCS1 Dup
LCS2
LCS 2 Dup
LCS3
LCS 3 Dup
Matrix Spikes
R-M29-O-1
R-M29-O-1 Dup
R-M29-0-2
R-M29-O-2 Dup
R-M29-O-FB
R-M29-O-FB Dup
R-M29-I-1
R-M29-I-1 Dup
R-M29-I-2
R-M29-I-2 Dup
R-M29-I-3
R-M29-I-3 Dup
Spike
Amount
O^g)
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
Recovery
(%)
100
98
107
109
100
97
50
51
58
54
99
102
52
53
163
159
169
172
Recovery
Limits (%)
80-120
80-120
80-120
80-120
80-120
80-120
80-120
80-120
80-120
80-120
80-120
80-120
80-120
80-120
80-120
80-120
80-120
80-120
6-17
-------
TABLE 6.13
METHOD 29 MERCURY FIELD BLANK ANALYSIS QC DATA
ASPHALT PLANT "B" - CARY, NC
Sample ID
FH
FH - Dup
BH
BH- Dup
HN03
HNO3 - Dup
KMn04
KmnO4 - Dup
HC1
HC1 - Dup
Recovered Amount C"g)
<0.400
< 0.400
<0.300
<0.300
<0.300
<0.300
<1.60
<1.60
< 0.200
< 0.200
6-18
-------
APPENDIX A
PROCESS DATA
-------
-------
Appendix A: Process Data
/fsprtflT -FLtotr "B"
Test Run 1
Test Date: August 27, 1997
Total Test Time: 5.6 hrs
Time
0940
1000
1015
1030
1045
1100
1115
1130
1145
1200
1215
1230
1245
1300
1315
1330
1345
1415
1430
1445
1500
1516
Event
*
*
*
*
Product
Type
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
Rl-2
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
Asphalt Concrete
Production
Rate
(TPH)
210
209
208
209
210
209
208
209
208
211
209
210
211
212
209
207
211
206
211
149
151
149
Total
(tons)
547
600
631
684
736
788
840
892
928
976
1,028
1,080
1,133
1,185
1,238
1,290
1,343
1,422
1,474
1,511
1,549
1,586
Asphalt
Temp.
(oF)
297
297
309
303
296
310
301
301
320
304
301
296
292
330
292
305
293
290
297
296
292
308
Aggregate Use
Rate
(TPH)
159
159
159
158
159
158
158
158
158
159
159
159
159
160
160
159
161
158
161
113
114
113
Total
(tons)
418
457
481
521
560
600
640
679
707
743
782
822
862
902
942
981
,022
,081
,120
,149
,177
,206
RAP Use
Rate
JTPH)
39
37
37
38
38
39
38
39
37
40
37
38
39
39
37
36
37
35
37
18
28
26
Total
(tons)
102
112
118
128
138
147
157
167
174
183
193
203
213
223
233
243
253
268
278
285
292
299
Asphalt
Cement Use
Rate
(TPH)
12.9
12.7
12.6
12.8
12.7
12.6
12.7
12.7
12.7
12.9
12.8
12.8
12.9
12.9
12.7
12.5
12.9
12.8
12.9
9.2
9.2
9.1
Total
(tons)
28
31
32
35
38
40
43
46
48
50
53
55
58
61
64
66
69
73
76
78
80
82
Calculated
Conditioner Use
Rate
(TPH)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total
(tons)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-------
Appendix A: Process Data
Test Run 1
Test Date: August 27, 1 997
Total Test Time: 5.6 hrs
Time
Total
Mean
St. Dev
Min
Max
Event
Product
Type
Asphalt Concrete
Production
Rate
(TPH)
201
21
149
212
Total
(tons)
1,039
Asphalt
Temp.
(oF)
301
9
290
330
Aggregate Use
Rate
(TPH)
153
16
113
161
Total
(tons)
788
RAP Use
Rate
(TPH)
36
5
18
40
Total
(tons)
197
Asphalt
Cement Use
Rate
(TPH)
12.3
1.2
9.1
12.9
Total
(tons)
54
Calculated
Conditioner Use
Rate
(TPH)
0
0
0
0
Total
(tons)
0
*See Table 4 for a description of these events.
-------
T>t<*WT "g
Test Run 1
Test Date: August 27, 1997
Total Test Time: 5.6 hrs
Time
0940
1000
1015
1030
1045
1100
1115
1130
1145
1200
1215
1230
1245
1300
1315
1330
1345
1415
1430
1445
1500
1516
Event
*
*
*
Product
Type
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
Fabric Filter
Inlet
Temp.
(oF)
345
340
365
350
340
350
350
350
330
350
340
340
340
335
335
350
340
350
330
350
345
350
Outlet
Temp.
(oF)
270
270
270
285
270
270
270
280
235
275
280
270
270
270
270
270
270
260
280
270
275
285
Pressure
Drop
(in. H20)
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
.2
.1
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
0.8
0.8
0.9
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Fuel
Use
teal)
77564
77656
77719
77815
77911
78003
78113
78201
78260
78375
78448
78577
78648
78749
78837
78923
79020
79154
79258
79325
79404
79470
Visible
Emissions
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
-------
Appendix A: Process Data
/UpHfttrT*_4»rr "l"
Test Run 1
Test Date: August 27, 1997
Total Test Time: 5.6 hrs
Time
Total
Mean
St. Dev
Min
Max
Event
Product
TYDC
Fabric Filter
Inlet
Temp.
(oF)
344
8
330
365
Outlet
Temp.
(oF)
271
10
235
285
Pressure
Drop
(in. H2O)
0.9
0.1
0.8
1.2
Fuel
Use
(gal)
1,906
Visible
Emissions
*See Table 4 for a description of these events.
-------
Appendix A: Process Data
AsvuAcr PC/WT "8''
Test Run 2
Test Date: August 28, 1997
Total Test Time: 6.7 hrs
Time
0746
0800
0815
0830
0845
0900
0915
0930
0945
1000
1015
1030
1045
1100
1130
1145
1200
1215
1230
1245
1300
1315
1330
1345
1415
1428
Event
*
*
*
Product
Type
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
Asphalt Concrete
Production
Rate
(TPH)
194
193
192
195
197
195
198
206
200
199
198
199
198
204
199
203
201
201
203
198
204
203
202
195
197
198
Total
(tons)
86
116
164
212
261
310
341
390
440
490
540
589
639
689
755
805
856
906
957
1007
1058
1109
1159
1209
1278
1327
Asphalt
Temp.
(oF)
295
298
294
288
299
306
300
285
299
299
299
302
301
297
296
321
307
309
304
303
284
296
305
302
293
302
Aggregate Use
Rate
(TPH)
146
145
147
148
149
149
150
150
151
151
151
151
151
153
152
153
154
152
154
153
154
154
153
152
150
150
Total
(tons)
66
90
126
163
200
237
260
298
336
372
411
449
487
525
575
613
651
689
728
766
805
843
881
920
972
1009
RAP Use
Rate
(TPH)
37
36
34
36
36
34
36
43
37
36
35
36
35
39
35
38
35
37
37
32
38
37
36
30
35
36
Total
(tons)
15
21
30
39
48
57
63
73
82
92
101
110
120
129
142
152
161
171
180
190
200
209
219
228
241
250
Asphalt
Cement Use
Rate
(TPH)
11.7
11.8
11.7
11.7
12.0
12.0
12.1
12.6
12.2
12.1
12.2
12.1
12.2
12.3
12.2
12.2
12.2
12.2
12.3
12.1
12.3
12.3
12.2
12.0
12.0
12.0
Total
(tons)
4
6
8
11
13
16
17
20
22
25
27
30
33
35
38
41
44
46
49
51
54
56
59
62
65
68
Calculated
Conditioner Use
Rate
(TPH)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total
(tons)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-------
Appendix A: Process Data
Test Run 2
Test Date: August 28, 1997
Total Test Time: 6.7 hrs
Time
Total
Mean
St. Dev
Min
Max
Event
Product
Type
Asphalt Concrete
Production
Rate
(TPH)
199
4
192
206
Total
(tons)
1,241
Asphalt
Temp.
(oF)
299
7
284
321
Aggregate Use
Rate
(TPH)
151
2
145
154
Total
Jtons)
943
RAP Use
Rate
(TPH)
36
2 .
30
43
Total
(tons)
235
Asphalt
Cement Use
Rate
(TPH)
12.1
0.2
11.7
12.6
Total
(tons)
64
Calculated
Conditioner Use
Rate
(TPH)
0
0
0
0
Total
(tons)
0
*See Table 4 for a description of these events.
-------
"g"
Test Run 2
Test Date: August 28, 1997
Total Test Time: 6.7 hrs
Time
0746
0800
0815
0830
0845
0900
0915
0930
0945
1000
1015
1030
1045
1100
1130
1145
1200
1215
1230
1245
1300
1315
1330
1345
1415
1428
Event
*
*
*
Product
Type
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
RI-2
Fabric Filter
Inlet
Temp.
(oF)
345
340
340
330
340
350
350
330
340
350
350
350
345
350
350
360
350
350
350
340
325
335
335
340
330
340
Outlet
Temp.
(oF)
340
260
270
255
260
270
280
285
285
280
290
285
280
290
280
300
295
290
295
285
275
275
285
290
280
275
Pressure
Drop
(in. H2O)
0.9
0.8
0.9
0.9
0.8
0.9
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.1
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.1
0.9
Fuel
Use
(gal)
79777
79861
79947
80048
80118
80224
80284
80374
80485
80570
80655
80763
80854
80943
81068
81170
81261
81364
81461
81529
81611
81692
81776
81864
81978
82082
Visible
Emissions
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
-------
Appendix A: Process Data
flsPrffll-T T*JtA/T "8"
Test Run 2
Test Date: August 28, 1997
Total Test Time: 6.7 hrs
Time
Total
Mean
St. Dev
Min
Max
Event
Product
Type
Fabric Filter
Inlet
Temp.
(oF)
343
8
325
360
Outlet
Temp.
(oF)
283
16
255
340
Pressure
Drop
(in. H20)
0.9
0.2
0.1
1.1
Fuel
Use
(gal)
2,305
Visible
Emissions
*See Table 4 for a description of these events.
-------
Test Run 3
Test Date: August 29, 1997
Total Test Time: 6.1 hrs
Time
0809
0822
0837
0852
0907
0922
0937
0952
1007
1022
1037
1052
1107
1122
1137
1152
1207
1222
1237
1325
1337
1352
1407
1413
Event
*
*
*
Product
Type
1-2
1-2
Binder
Binder
Binder
Binder
Binder
Binder
Binder
1-2
1-2
1-2
1-2
1-2
1-2
1-2
1-2
1-2
1-2
1-2
1-2
1-2
1-2
1-2
Asphalt Concrete
Production
Rate
JTPH)
130
160
150
153
154
154
155
155
188
185
194
193
195
194
194
193
194
193
132
130
130
130
131
130
Total
(tons)
28
66
102
139
175
212
249
285
329
373
419
464
509
555
600
645
691
709
749
772
788
818
819
867
Asphalt
Temp.
(oF)
344
293
310
296
296
295
296
300
297
300
291
300
302
286
288
289
297
302
334
352
293
292
307
311
Aggregate Use
Rate
(TPH)
122
150
143
146
147
147
148
148
179
177
182
181
183
182
182
181
182
182
124
122
122
122
123
123
Total
(tons)
28
66
102
138
175
212
249
285
329
373
419
464
509
555
600
645
691
709
749
772
788
818
849
867
RAP Use
Rate
(TPH)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total
(tons)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Asphalt
Cement Use
Rate
(TPH)
8.1
9.9
6.8
7.1
7.0
7.0
7.2
7.2
8.7
8.4
12.0
12.0
12.1
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
11.8
8.2
8.0
8.0
8.1
8.1
8.1
Total
(tons)
1
4
6
8
9
11
13
15
17
19
22
25
28
31
34
37
40
41
44
45
46
48
50
52
Calculated
Conditioner Use
Rate
(TPH)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total
(tons)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-------
Appendix A: Process Data
Test Run 3
Test Date: August 29, 1997
Total Test Time: 6. 1 hrs
Time
Total
Mean
St. Dev
Min
Max
Event
Product
Type
Asphalt Concrete
Production
Rate
(TPH)
163
26
130
195
Total
(tonsL
839
Asphalt
Temp.
(oF)
303
17
286
352
Aggregate Use
Rate
(TPH)
154
25
122
183
Total
(tons)
839
RAP Use
Rate
(TPH)
0
0
0
0
Total
^ftons)
0
Asphalt
Cement Use
Rate
(TPH)
9.2
2.0
6.8
12.1
Total
(tons)
51
Calculated
Conditioner Use
Rate
(TPH)
0
0
0
0
Total
(tons)
0
*See Table 4 for a description of these events.
-------
"g"
Test Run 3
Test Date: August 29, 1997
Total Test Time: 6.1 hrs
Time
0809
0822
0837
0852
0907
0922
0937
0952
1007
1022
1037
1052
1107
1122
1137
1152
1207
1222
1237
1325
1337
1352
1407
1413
Event
*
*
*
Product
Type
1-2
1-2
Binder
Binder
Binder
Binder
Binder
Binder
Binder
1-2
1-2
1-2
1-2
1-2
1-2
1-2
1-2
1-2
1-2
1-2
1-2
1-2
1-2
1-2
Fabric Filter
Inlet
Temp.
(oF)
365
320
335
320
320
320
325
330
320
290
310
320
320
310
310
310
320
310
360
370
320
320
335
335
Outlet
Temp.
(oF)
285
265
285
270
270
270
270
270
270
270
260
260
270
260
260
260
265
250
290
270
260
260
280
280
Pressure
Drop
(in. H2O)
1.0
2.0
1.0
1.2
1.2
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.0
1.0
1.2
1.5
1.3
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.5
1.9
1.9
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.0
1.0
Fuel
Use
teal)
83174
83250
83317
83394
83444
83508
83572
83638
83711
83784
83872
83927
84055
84171
84209
84305
84404
84434
84512
84556
84600
84657
84728
84794
Visible
Emissions
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
-------
-------
APPENDIX B
RAW FIELD DATA
-------
-------
Appendix B.I
Raw Field Data
Baghouse Inlet
-------
-------
"D6KQ
EPA METHOD 1
TRAVERSE POINT LOCATION FOR CIRCULAR DUCTS
PLANT
CITY
/%?«*a- 7-A*wr "B"
Qxft
SAMPLING LOCATION JXk
STA
-U
TE ^
Jp^Xr i
c^
M^K^
INSIDE OF FAR WALL TO OUTSIDE
OF NIPPLE, (DISTANCE A) g~7 W
INSIDE OF NEAR WALL TO OUTSIDE
OF NIPPLE, (DISTANCE B) 3 /y
NEAREST UPSTREAM DISTURBANC
DISTURBANCE bown caT" |
E ^
^'.\A^
f"
NEAREST DOWNSTREAM DISTURBANCE £3'"
DISTURBANCE
>
SAMPLER
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
I
l\
3
V
r
6
7
8
4
ID
»(
IL
4t>b>Ml-f
FRACTION
OF STACK I.D.
7.1
6-?
K-8
1^.7
>^0
3^6
^M
7S:o
81^
S8^>
13-, 3
17.?
DATE
STACK
I.D.
•*y#"
^
i
i
\7
ft -
• sr-^?
• / ^/"
\.
( .TO
— ^J N^
\l
SCHEMATIC OF SAMPLING LOCATlOfc ^
PRODUCT OF
COLUMNS 2 AND 3
(TO NEAREST 1/8-INCH)
l.iM
3,63
/ W /"i
U? t ' v/
I- » (0\J
I3.«
/ O <2j (
^(y <&t/
to-^
w.^r
U"^ 0 ^
S-6-U
53, t(
DISTANCE B
3^'U
V
|y
TRAVERSE DISTANCE
FROM OUTSIDE OF NIPPLE
(SUM OF COLUMNS 4 & 5)
-------
GAS VELOCITY AND VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE
Plant: , , A&rtrta- TIA*JT "g" Date: o/Jzu
Sampling Lo
Run#:
Barometric F
Moisture, %:
Stack Dimen
Wet Bulb, °F
Tntvaraa
Point
Number
fi l
— «1
~\
L/
s~
£
7
V
*j
JO
it
i3-
ft i
_^
3
L/
^
6
1
%
1
/o
/I
id-
eation: ft^Ao^t ^*kr Clock Time: 8-'0c)
ft e 1 . A ; /i**, Ooerators: S^M/AO
'ressure, in. \
Ha: ^7/fr Static Pressure, in. HUO: ~^^
Molecular wt.. Drv: Pitot Tube. CD: o.W
sion, in. Diameter or Sid
': Dry
Vttodty
Haad
In.HjO
O.^1/
O-H^
^^r
OS~?
f) ^\ ^
^) - (0 0
fr=?0 5;S~
0^2.0-*
oil ^
^v ^ o "f ^/. "7*1
' >Q C- ^y /*^ Tjj
Or^ ^GV
o.//
c? J6
^.^^
C?.2G
o.
-------
GAS ANALYSIS DATA FORM
PLAMT
DATE
V
COMMENTS:
_TE$T HO.
SAMPLING TIME (24*f CLOCK)
SAMPLING LOCATION
SAMPLE TYPE (BAG, INTEGRATED. CONTINUOUS).
ANALYTICAL METHOD.
AMBIENT TEMPERATURE
OPERATOR T
7r)
^^^^ RUN
GAS ^^^
C02
02(NET IS ACTUAL 02
READING MINUS ACTUAL
C02 READING)
CO(NET IS ACTUAL CO
READING MINUS ACTUAL
02 READING)
N2(NETIS1NMMUS
ACTUAL CO READING)
1
ACTUAL
READING
J2
Ifr*
NET
/?•/
^/7
2
ACTUAL
READING
1.2,
/B-*
NET
/^./
§1.7
3
ACTUAL
READING
Xz.
te.j>
NET
5:^
/?./
^s
817
AVERAGE
NET
VOLUME
^2,
t*>, I
&-7
MULTIPLIER
«.'IOO
32/IOO
a/ioo
a'IM
MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF
STACK GAS (DRY BASIS)
."*
TOTAL
-------
GAS ANALYSIS DATA FORM
PLANT.
DATE.
COMMENTS:
JTEST NO.
SAMPLING TIME (24* CL
SAMPLING LOCATION.
SAMPLE TYPE (BAG, INTEGRATED. CONTINUOUS).
ANALYTICAL METHOD
AMBIENT TEMPERATURE
OPERATOR
\. RUN
GAS ^\
C02
02(HET IS ACTUAL 02
READING MINUS ACTUAL
C02 READING)
CO|NET IS ACTUAL CO
READING MINUS ACTUAL
0| READING)
N2(NETISlNMmUS
ACTUAL CO READING)
1
ACTUAL
READING
4,o
!.
MULTIPLIER
H'100
M.IW
a/ioo
a'MO
MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF
STACK GAS (DRY BASIS)
»d.
TOTAL
-------
FIELD DATA SHEET
"r
£20 Sampling Location JP
Run Number: I
Dato:
elm
Sample Type:
Pbar:
C02:
Operator:
Ps: - \ . V
02: IS
Nozzle ID:
Thermocouple #:
Pretest Leak Rate:,
Pretest Leak Check: Pitot: /».<>, Orsat:
in. Hg.
Probe Length/Type: 5"/j£-/o5 Pitot #:
Stack Diameter:
-------
METHOD 23 CDD/CDF SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA
.
Plant /Ui
T "8"
Sample Date:
Filter No.(s):
Run No.:
Job No.:
Sample Location: I™ L& J rF /
Recovery Date:
XAD-2 Trap No.(s):
Sample Recovery Person:
^iSrS^S
Impingers
Final wt.
Initial wt.
Netwt.
;;,> '- .''*•?*
?|t||ft
XAD -2
Trap
f£73
125.0
42-3
f?§pMfe"
£^r£@H
1
(knockout)
J87.6
•^^rf
§p^."5 ^
ISwSitul^b^M:^^^
2 3
(100mlH2O) (100mlH2O)
(untipped) (tipped)
731 1 &r5./
70?, 7 700. C
11.0 (^A*\
eralx^:^4^i|l|§I^Bs
(knockout) Silica gel
(untipped) (untipped)
£0^3 $t].C a
5Js,& X/6.5 g
4-.T AVv I g
Train System:
Probe:
Filter. Color -
Loading -
Impinger Contents:
Silica Gel:
@Grams
Used-
Color - % Spent -
Condensate Observed In Front Half:
-~ *'**^fi i;!*! ,& — jrr'V.'vT
}• ^-;*c ?>T
"•• ^'^^ Recove rVd SimMe^racnons : > j^ r*J>A;:r^;^^: •-. '^.-^vrtc^-
Filter Container No.
XAD Module Container No.:
Probe (FH) & Back Half Rinse (Acetone) Container No.:
Probe (FH) & Back Half Rinse (Toluene) Container No.:
Impinger Contents Container No.:
Impinger Rinse (Acetone/MeCI2) Container No.:
marked/sealed:
marked/sealed:
Liquid level
marked/sealed:
Liquid level
marked/sealed:
Liquid level
marked/sealed:
Liquid level
marked/sealed:
-------
FIELD DATA SHEET
Plant ,_
Sampling Location _
Run Number: )~
Pretest Leak Rate:
(J- k» i^c
Date:
'Ltturr ''B" Sample Type:
Pbar:
L CO2:
Operator:
Thermocouple #: 5~6
Co
P»: ~l.
02:
elm @ pfl in. Hg. Probe Length/Type:
V -X Pretett Leak Check: Pilot:
-------
Page
of 2.
Plant Name: Test Date:
Run]
Traverse
Point
Number
j|
3
V
•
r
(D
1-
fi
, Mfc 1 $
/
/To //V;a£
/
/00 '
/
fin i
i
>£2P '
/
yjO 1
1
Axo '
/
WO *
1
VW t
1
1
Gas Meier
Reading
B^D.7^
£3^ /V
^•jjr. 53
^3-5.^^/9
Velocity
llead(P,
in. IhO
o.M
ro-T^V
0-'#
'^-g'nj
Orifice Prcs. Differential
Desired
Bbo. '^
•o./ ^p-
Actual
6.15-
d>. /6
i •)
Qtfi
*
Stack
Temp. • F
m
305"
^^^
oC * O
/ ^
Operator:
Probe
Temp./ Filler
Temp* F
/
23^ t^yy-
i
%Z3> '2S7
'
233 7^jTB-^*«r
H£>/Ai/4
Impinger
Temp.
•F
Ct*T
£{9
fe
Dry Gas Meier Temp.
Inlet
/O^
/O^
Lor
(Juliet
(t .) -F
IOX
[Of
lot
—
Pump
Vacuum
In.llg
P. n
3.0
2o
• _
fa
ff
f£
-------
METHOD 23 CDD/CDF SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA
Plant: fan4u- rumr V Run No.:
Sample Date: Z/Z&fJI Filter No.(s): Job No.:
Sample Location: J3£j.b €L& ' IfiJiET %M 2
Recovery Date: XAD-2 Trap No.(s):
Sample Recovery Person:
%f 5f ^pftt^^^;^ •::- :';:^5^Mo^^b1^sSfeS'
12 34
Impingers XAD-2 (knockout) (100mlH2O) (100mlH2O) (knockout) Silica gel
Trap (untipped) (tipped) (untipped) (untipped)
Final wt. 452% 52% ? 70$.? 70 S.I 607. £ 9f%.5 a
Initial wt. 4£7. a ^Z/ff"^ ^05. \ *70f\3 ^)2.£ $55. "2. g
Netwt. %6^.t> \3-V ) o.fr (.0 \.0 13.*5 g
A'5ZrBO':.V-'r,"-CTi£:!''rf;^"*- •'-" .'.- £"f g ""^'-•- •>* "^'. -" • " ' " -•-•i;--'V"-ll>r""-'' '--., -• ;-'y.-g ^v';>>l^'^V^y '•''">-'' : 'l'^ii;fl'-y;'a';Q[g^k'-J'. 7ff~-:
.' -*:',^v%.' '^••"^•-' '-w ':-':/-~:'--.-'-'~.£)T^-t ' .'~'- ' •'".""'-' Dfe"scripuontv^j-':::*"7c^-:'Tf^;,f%^^tf? ^T^^^^t^'i'^''1"
Train System:
Probe:
Filter: Color - Loading -
Impinger Contents:
Silica Gel: ©Grams Used - Color- % Spent -
Condensate Observed In Front Half:
A^g^^U^: "-.-'v. ;:R^overed^a^pi^^cl^-v;^P®|i^^
Filter Container No. marked/sealed:
XAD Module Container No.: marked/sealed:
Liquid level
Probe (FH) & Back Half Rinse (Acetone) Container No.: marked/sealed:
Liquid level
Probe (FH) & Back Half Rinse (Toluene) Container No.: marked/sealed:
Liquid level
Impinger Contents Container No.: marked/sealed:
Liquid level
Impinger Rinse (Acetone/MeCI2) Container No.: marked/sealed:
5s-
-
-------
>7o
K
FIELD DATA SHEET
Plant
. 6 YP Sampling Location
, &32.Run Number: *3
Date:
Sample Type:
Pbar:
CO2:
[£
P»:
O2:
Operator:
-t.fi
Nozzle ID:
Thermocouple #:
Pretest Leak Rate: <^tiO^_ elm @ If" in. Hg.
Pretest Leak Check: PHot: ^Q^ Orsat: /jjtf
Probe Length/Type: &&'/&«* Pilot #:
Stack Diameter: «y cfm @ pgin. Hg.
Post-Test Leak Check: Pitol:0.£O,i Orsat:
-------
METHOD 23 CDD/CDF SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA
Plant:
"S
Run No.:
Sample Date:
Filter No.(s):
Job No.:
Sample Location:
Recovery Date:
XAD-2 Trap No.(s):
Sample Recovery Person:
Impingers
XAD-2
Trap
1
(knockout)
(100mlH2O)
(unoped)
(100mlH2O)
(tipped)
4
(knockout)
(untippedj
Silica gel
(untipped)
Final wt.
900.2.
JZZ.2
Initial wt.
4553
7/5.
600.®
907.3
Netwt.
Train System:
J
Probe:
Filter: Color -
Loading -
Impinger Contents:
Silica Gel: @Grams Used -
Color -
% Spent -
Condensate Observed In Front Half:
Recovered Sample Fractions
Filter Container No.
marked/sealed:
XAD Module Container No.:
marked/sealed:
Probe (FH) & Back Half Rinse (Acetone) Container No.:
Liquid level
marked/sealed:
Probe (FH) & Back Half Rinse (Toluene) Container Na:
Liquid level
marked/sealed:
Impinger Contents Container No.:
Liquid level
marked/sealed:
Impinger Rinse (Acetone/MeCI2) Container No.:
Liquid level
marked/sealed:
-------
FIELD DATA SHEET
"2 .:
Plant rHPHWir VIJUT "s" Sample Type: rl£TAi.S Operator: X £• S .
Sampling Loc
Run Number:
«lk>n iNt-^T Pbar: 2*7 • S P»: ~~I'&"M^0
3. Date: O^A?/)7 CO2:
Pretest Leak Rate: O-o\ > cfrn @ '5~ in
Pretest Leak Check: Pitot: ^/ Orsat: ^/
TraverM
Point
Nurotm
6i-
Z.
*J
q
o
MO
S"0
I-Z-O
Vf*
OockTlmt
(244iour
docfc)
Gas Meter
Reading
(Vm)ft3
U8.338
I'^H-'i)
I10.Z5-
I'S.&./S"
( iy2 i / 0
. i4$,o~}~
i^v./,c?P
(^-CJ.££
(6>G>~Z.O
\1-LOZfo
O2:
. Hg. Probe Length/Typ
'^ Stack Diameter:
Velocity
Head(Ap)
kiHZO
e:s'6/.*i5 Pitot#:ps-c
As:
Orillce Pressure Differential
(AH) in H2O
Desired
Actual
y/////////////////////
O,(-.)i^
0, <-)•***
(j,<-t^
O'^ef
O.LJLJ
0< M6tT
,9/0/7.
t^'fT^
CPv^?"*^
i. 1
1.1
1, /
1 ^
I-/
1 •'2-
I-.S'
u7
LI
1. /
I.I
1,7
I./
1,~Z-
1 r?
f-5T
Stack
Temp.
(Ts)
Nozzle D: Q^^B Thermocouple *:T^?/!.
Assumed Bws: Filter # : 5 r<$4. v
Meter Box #:M£"-
<=j Y: i'.7'?6 AH@: [
Post-Test Leak Rate:^^^.
Post-Test Leak Check: Pitot:
Temperature
°F
Probe
////////////
$07-
3ZC>
2^78
2o3
29^
S5O
^O|
~2Si°i
*>0&
e,3j
24-6
2^Z.
Z^(
•2-S"^
•"££?/
^2^V
^-6^_
*yf .6/3
Fitter
Impinger
Temp.
°F
cfm ©•^
j^_Orw
Dry Gas Meter Temp.
Inlet
(Tmln0F)
yy//////////////.
fcp.fc> C^-
*"7 "*T i
2Uy^
~L2*\
'2-^7
7j£ ^
•2JC//51
"£.? O
2^^~
S"7-
^5"
CT$~
C/
^j
4.3
tr-fLf
?rR
6'Z.
^€~
^7>
^
ICX)
{O9
/O /
A37
Outlet
(Tm out°F)
/
in. Hg.
it: T^A
Pump
Vacuum
f«.Hfl)
///////////,
°l^~
9 >
^c,
/d/
toy
/4T
10 "^
/O2_
^
9
J3
•V.T-
(/
2X-V4/
^
^
-------
MULTI-METALS SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA
Plant:
Run No.: |
Date:
Sample Box No.:
Job No.:
Sample Location:
Sample Type:
25?
Sample Recovery Person:
Container Description
Volume, ml Sealed/Level Marked
Filter No.(s) M=v? - >o, \\,\t,rt.
Acetone Rinse
Nitric Rinse - lm£. 1,2,3, + Back 1/2 Filter
?5T?.3+35%
5A
Nitric Rinse - Impinger No. 4
5B
KMNO4/H2O Rinse - Impingers 5 & 6
5C
HCI Rinse - Impingers 5 & 6
Impinger
No.
Contents
Initial
Volume, ml
Initial
Weight, grams
Final
Net
105-3.3
loo
/eo
•7(0.0
7.-5T
6.03,0
100
too
Total
Comments:
-------
1
FIELD DATA SHEET
Plant .....
Sampling Location )/\/l g T
Run Number: £. Date:
Pretest Leak Rate: O elm @ 2.6 in. Hg.
Pretest Leak Check: Pilot: y/"" Orsat:
Sample Type:
Pbar:
CO2:
2.°1. Operator:
Ps: ~I,B
O2:
(2
Nozzle ID: O.iW Thermocouple #: T.S7
Assumed Bws: 3Z. Filter »:5gg^gro^g^«
Meter Box #:/^
.Y:JLOi£_/
Probe Length/Type: S '&LA3S
Stack Diameter: As:
Post-Test Leak Rate:o o<^cfm @ tg in. Hg
Post-Tesl Leak Check: Pitol: \/ Orsat
Travaraa
Point
Nurnbw
Samplng
Tlnw
(mln)
Clock Tima
(244iour
dock)
GasMeUr
RMcfing
(Vm)n3
Velocity
HMd (Ap)
lnH2O
Oriflc* Prassur* Oilter*nltal
(AH) in H2O
Desired
Stack
Tamp.
(Ts)
Temperature
°F
Filter
knpinger
Tamp.
°F
Dry Gas Malar Tamp.
Inlet
(Tmin0F)
Outlet
(Tmout°F)
Pump
Vacuum
fm.Hg)
-------
MULTI-METALS SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA
Plant: fcrwtf fu^er "s" Run No.: 2^
Date: gjZS'f^T- !
Sample Box No.: Job No.:
Sample Location: HX1 L f=_rn
Sample Type: M 2^f
Sample Recovery Person: 3 . M &£.£, ArN(
Container Description Volume, ml Sealed/Level Marked
'^^^^s^^ssss^f^^sS^^^^^ife^^^j^^is^^Ki^.
--"^-o^'-.i?;v^.^:^r-'~^^^^^*^P^^g^^^.J?.
1 Filter No.(s)
2 Acetone Rinse
2 Nitric Rinse
£|;< :j^^'lililti^^
4 Nitric Rinse - Imp. 1,2,3, + Back 1/2 Filter
5A Nitric Rinse - Impinger No. 4
5B KMNO4/H2O Rinse - Impingers 5 & 6
5C HCI Rinse - Impingers 5 & 6
Impinger
No.
/
2.
3
TV
K/v\^OM
KM^O^
&k
Initial
Volume, ml
\a&
)GO
$
100
[CrO
tf/Ar
Weight, grams
Initial
697.0
•7-5 i$
474.fr
U3.1
9-15,0
7^z.^
SL&.<\
Final
//VO.S'
T^e.^
£U.I
&M.<{
'•3-\(j t'f'
w^*7(/
-------
K
FIELD DATA SHEET
Plant .
Sampling Location _
Run Number: ^>
Adty
Hwd(Ap)
lnH2O
Oi«c» Pr«s«jr« DMsranlwl
(AH) In H2O
Desired J ^ctua»
Stack
Temp.
(Ts)
Temperature
°F
Probe
Rter
bnpinger
Temp.
Dry Gas Meter Temp.
Inlet
(Tmin0l=)
Outlet
(Tm out°F)
Pump
Vacuum
(in. HQ)
O
0.3
S3?
-2.^7-
cus
0.3.C,
95-
1 i
LL<
S"'
93
03T-
fTl
£33
Z-l
99
2.96
sro
lOO
10
02
JO
II
(9.73
100
, /Z.
Z.S7-
\O(
0.Z.S"
263
(5?
3 .'00
/o/
3/Z--
SX
iL
i r
IS
tee)
z;
too ..
-------
MULTI-METALS SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA
Plant: Asrwa- T>u*« "s"
Date: 8/A9/97
Sample Box No.:
Run No.: 3
Job No.:
Sample Location: THtiCT
Sample Type: M2F}
Sample Recovery Person: "7", 7^/^ 'RSOfJ
Container Description
Volume, ml
Sealed/Level Marked
1 Filter No.(s)
2 Acetone Rinse
3 Nitric Rinse
4 Nitric Rinse - Imp. 1 ,2,3, + Back 1/2 Filter
5A Nitric Rinse - Impinger No. 4
5B KMNO4/H2O Rinse - Impingers 5 & 6
5C HCI Rinse - Impingers 5 & 6
^•j
€xpry
1/kA HU.J
KH« 0*
S/L.GtL.
Initial
Volume, ml
O
/oo
/DO
0
/OO
tCO
—^
Weight, grams
Initial
679-7
738. /
4,71 -J
£2-7 £
*f£<*~
72#./
$78.?
Final
lOtf'P
75-7, y
682^)
630.4
7/£ ^
73^^
&*?&!)
Net
59?- 5 ,
lfl.3
2^i
3.G
Co.l
o.^
1^3
t^ j a
comments: l
-------
-------
Appendix B.2
Raw Field Data
Baghouse Outlet
-------
-------
TRAVERSE POINT LOCATION FOR^ftCtttAR DUCTS
Plant:.
Date:
"g"
Sampling Location:
$.P
Inside of Far Wall to Outside of Nipple:.
Inside of Near Wall to Outside of Nipple (Nipple Length):.
Stack I.D.:
Distance Downstream from Flow Disturbance (Distance B):
•Z.U'
inches / Stack I.D.
dd
Distance Upstream from Flow Disturbance (Distance A):
t 2>C, inches / Stack I.D. - Jjj__dd
Calculated By:
ji'ie-Cy . ,
Schematic of
Sampling Location
Traverse
Point
Number
(
^
0
4
Fraction
of
Length
4/S
a1/*-
8'^
^
Length
(inches)
H'/8
U3/^
eP<^/6
59TB
Product of
Columns 2 & 3
(To nearest 1/8")
Nipple
Length
(inches)
2"
/
Traverse Point
Location
(Sum of Col. 4 & 5)
-------
GAS VELOCITY AND VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE
Plant: ((*?**<* ?uw "•&" Date: t? ~^-- < '
Sampling Lot
Run *: V
'sa&on'.^rAQ^ Clock Time: D&3U
ylOilii^-, Ooerators: A//^)
Barometric Pressure, in. h
Moisture, %^^ '*
Stack Dimen
Wet Bulb, °F
TravcrM
Point
Number
/j /
' 2
1
H
"~~> \
t/ /
2
3
^
^ /
7
3
q
P I
2.
3
4
jr ;
7
3
? M"
F /
"2
3
^
la: Static Pressure, in. HUO: - /"^
Molecular wL. Drv: Pitot Tube" CD: #/
sion, in. Diameter or Side
! Drvt
'(. d-L 3i
*7"1-*^T
*^7 *™T^3
•77}
Z ?7
1^3
Z7Z
7/7 z- '
272-
T;. ^^
H : 33 side 2: ^1
3ulb.°F:
Md - (0.44 X KCO^) •«• (0.32 X %0^) + (0.28 x %N^)
Md-(0.44x ) + {0.32X ) + (Oi8x )
Md«
% h^O * HjO
Ms-
T»- °F« °R (°F + 4ett
f 13.8 13.6
P.- ItvHg
«F-
^— 1 T«fR)
v« - 85.40 x cp x J£P x M — STjj; —
Vt-85,49x{ )X( )XM
V«- ftfe
A.- t2
Qt-V«xAsx60t/rn
Qt- x X60
Q§ • ACnil
^•td" * x 17>647 x IT * ° " ~iw }
ltd 100
oscfnn
-------
°Q3
n
GAS ANALYSIS DATA FORM
PLANT.
OATE_
ASPHALT
"s"
COMMENTS:
_TE$T NO.
SAMPLING TIME (24* CLOCK)
SAMPLING LOCATION
SAMPLE TYPE (BAG, INTEGRATED, CONTINUOUS).
ANALYTICAL METHOD
AMBIENT TEMPERATURE
OPERATOR _ 77 7
70
^v^^^ RUN
GAS ^^^v^
C02
02
-------
GAS ANALYSIS DATA FORM
PLANT.
DATE_
g
COMMENTS:
.TEST NO.
SAMPLING TIME (24* CLDCIft—>
SAMPLING LOCATOH
SAMPLE TYPE (BAG. INTEGRATED. CONTINUOUS).
ANALYTICAL METHOD
AMBIENT TEMPERATURE
OPERATOR
"^v. RUN
GAS ^\
C02
02(NET IS ACTUAL 02
READING MINUS ACTUAL
C02 READING)
COfNET IS ACTUAL CO
READING MINUS ACTUAL
02 READING)
N2(NETIS1NMniUS
ACTUAL CO READING)
1
ACTUAL
READING
3.o
US
NET
14.3
2
ACTUAL
READING
NET
3
ACTUAL
READING
NET
AVERAGE
NET
VOLUME
> . l y
•
s;». /
MULTIPLIER
W-'IW
32/100
a/ioo
21 '100
MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF
STACK GAS (DRY BASIS)
«„.
TOTAL
-------
Visible Emission Observation Form
SOURCE NAME rv v £• •
ADDRESS ^ /-,.*-.
it f L / -L t^
A
«;^A
//euj C/iape) tf.'/r f
C/TY 1~) / "> I
r\£)/£j£fh
PHONE '
STATE//c
SOURCE
PROCESS EQUIPMENT j j
CONTROL EQUIPMENT i i
bQ.c?hoOS&,
DESCRIBE EMISSION POINT
START r£^^^\£cAc STOP
HEIGHT ABOVE GROUND LEVEL
** "? *~" T*V
sr4/?7" 5^ sro/>saM£
DISTANCE FROM OBSERVER
START ^OQ^ STOP sftrtt
ID NUN
C
Pint") I
^
ZIP
Iflf fl
OPERA TING MODS
OPERA TING MODE
Sf\ni
HEIGHT RELATIV
START IS f+
DIRECTION FRC
START/Wiv'
^-
f TOOBSERVER
STOP j,/5A)£
1M OBSERVER
STOP StMt
DESCRIBE EMISSIONS .
START C077V7«? UprJufd STOP 5ft*4&
EMISSION COLOR
START of&y STOP 5ftrtt
WATER DROPLETS PRESENT-
NO D YESSf
PLUME TYPE CONTINUOUS &
FUGITIVE D INTERMITTENT D
IF WA TER DRO
ATTACHED^
POINT IN THE PLUME AT WHICH OPACITY WAS
START $ 3-4 ^AW «//V\,
/
2
3
4
5
6
7
6
9
10
1 1
12
13
14
15
(6
J7
rs
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
0
D
0
O
o
0
o
o
o
D
e>
0
0
c!)
o
o
o
o
0
o
0
£>
O
O
0
6
O
0
Q
O
n
15
C
o
D
O
T)
O
O
x'
o
0
5
£>
&
o
D
x
O
o
O
0
0
o
30
O
6
c!)
O
O
O
O
(^>
O
0
o
o
(0
o
r>
"O
o
o
o
O
D
0 Q_
o lo
(^>
o
o
/
D
o
O
O
,x
D
SMflT TIME
A9/2Z-
45
D
S>
0
0
n
o
o
o
f)
0
t)
O
o
n
//
o
o
0
O
o
Q
O
D
f)
0
D
O
O
AVERAGE OPACITY FOR
HIGHEST PERIOD O.H/L
^
i/
32
33
34
35
36
37
35
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
5;
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
0
O
0
O
O
O
O
^
0
X
0
o
^
6s
5*
O
O
o
c
0
o
o
C3
O
/
o
o
o
(^
&
0
£)
£>
//
o
o
o
30
5"
O
O
&
o
o
o
5"
o
o
o
0
0
o
o
o
c
o
o
o
o
o
o
c
o
o
X
o
CD
o
05
o-
o
o
o
o
<£>
Ci
(^
o
o
0
0
D
o
0
o
o
0
o
o
o
•sr
o
X
o
0
X
(f)
o
^)
NUMBER OF READINGS ABOVE
O % WERE €
RANGE OF OPACITY READINGS ^
MINIMUM O MAXIMUM ^>
OBSERVER'S NAME (PRINT) *T\ " \ /- /- t
OBSERVER'S S/GWljjg&f?^'
DATE
(~\f)(~+ Af\ll7 A Tn)t^^ *T "\ /
^ v* f i ^ C"F ^^ / ^\ ^
CERTIFIEOBY £ --^
VERIFIED BY
DATE 3_/v_«y-a
DATE
Quality Assurance Handbook M9-4.2
-------
r4-
D6€C(r
SOURCE NAME ^~
\
Visible Emission Observation Form \ Q>
. 1 OBSER VA TION DA TE
1 ADDRESS s-) s . t J rp J » / TV fl^-^f0
/^/j o?W /
C/7Y T) 1 ' i
PHONE ^
STATE
/oc
SOURCE
PROCESS EQUIPMENT
\CONTR'0{ EQUIPMENT '
(y+ «i *ioo5(^
DESCRIBE EMISSIOffPOINT
START ^'ticbnojk>(\ sWV STOP 5
HEIGHT ABOVE GROUND LEVEL
START 35 STOP $f\rr\£
[*"$%&? 'sTOP^l
HEIGHTF,
START
DIRECTI
START
DESCRIBE EMISSIONS
START CcrniVlt, STOP
\EMISSlON COLOtf
START *)fty STOP 6flM£
WATER'ORdPLETS PRESENT-
\ NO Sf' YESO
PLUME
FUGITIV
IF WA Tt
ATTAC
*/'// i^d
ZIP
Ht,
in NilMRPR
OPERA TING MODE
OPERA TING MODE
,"3~'*'
START f>2^ STOP '4**ff
AMBIENT TEMP
START "3*5 STOP 9Z
Source Layout Sketch
Sun-fy Wind _s,
Plume and — ^_^
^^
SKY CONDITIONS
START cf&KVX STOP %A*^
• WIND DIRECTION
START ^b STOP 5^M^
WE T BULB TEMP. RH.percent
3& ^o &&
4^pl&nJl
e^vr»'^tj6-'
Draw North Arrow
•^Emission Point
Observers Petition
ervers^
Sun < in iij^y/i jf)>ir"
COMMENTS
^***
1 HAVE RECEIVED A COPY OF THESE OPACITY OBSfRVA TlONS
SIGNA TURE
TITLE
DATE
/
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
n
12
13
14
15
re
J7
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
0
O
0
0
&
o
o
o
0
o
o
c>
O
o
O
O
t)
P
£>
c
o
o
(0
o
o
0
o
D
o
30 |O
15
0 <
o
o
o
o
0
0
o
o
o
0
o
0
o
0
o
o
o
0
o
0
o
0
6
t)
r:
O
O
/
D
'&
0
5
i ^Z**^
c?
C0
C
START TIME,
\
45 /I
D
D
o
O
o
o
o
o
o
a
O
u
c)
c>
£}
/H
C
O
O
d>
o
/
o
ic)
o
n
P
€>
' O
AVERAGE OPACITY FOR
HIGHES T PERIOD O .MX
nw\
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
0
0
/
0
0
0
O
V
o
t>
t>
O
y
O
0
6>
0
0
fc>
0
f
0
0
o
o
D
O
5"
0
o>
0
srop TIME
15
o
/
o
o
/
'O
0
0
o
c
/
0
o
(V
0
o
b
O
s
o
o
0
/"
s>
c>
-^
0
30
t)
0
^
t)
0
0
t;
x
0
v
0
irf3-m-^>
oxirf
Quality Assurance Handbook Mi.
-------
Visible Emission Observation Form
SOURCE NAME^f . --- vi
C
/IsPfMcTPUlWT "lJ* CW&Sl /\« 'yh. J ^
/]/ft^j Ch<*pel JJ>
CITY T) !„ \. /
PHONE
// J
SrAT£A/C
SOURCE
PROCESS EQUIPMENT
CONTROL EQUIPMENT
DESCRIBE EMISSION POINT
HEIGHT ABOVE GROUND LEVEL
START 3^ ** STOP ^f^
DISTANCE FROM OBSERVER
START ilO6fr STOP 5fl/»?£
ID NUfis
W
ZIP
1BER
OPERA TING MODE
OPERA TING MODE
***•
HEIGHT RELATIV
START /5" "ft
DIRECTION FRC
START S/A/W
DESCRIBE EMISSIONS
START <-(m- ni ft ^
WIND SPEED ^ \
START /- 3~/' STOP 0-3*
AMBIENT TEMP
START Si STOP %%££
Source Layout Sketch
Sun-fy Wind ^ *
Plume and — ^^i
Stack ^----"''CL-
Sun Tojji
s*
tfrt£
SKY CONDI I IONS
START C\tA/~ STOP ^f^
w WIND DIRECTION
START /]/ STOP /Vk/
WE T BULB TEMP. RH.percent
^ ^i&? ^&£) "0^ ?E-
Draw North
^>V>
Observers Pjytit
COMMENTS
o/tMisi^ rt&J*
Arrow
\^£JJ
'*¥&-
^IruttienfaUn
^"5
1 HAVE RECEIVED A COPY OF THESE OPACITY
SIGNATURE
TITLE
OBSERVATIONS
DATE
tBSERVA TION DA T£
'fwX.
/
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
II
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
0
0
CD
0
0
o
o
^
s
O
O
^5
^
O
O
o
0
/
O
o
6
0
c
c
o
0
o
o
O
o
0
t)
30
o
o
<9
o
/
&
0
o
o
O
O
o
o
0
^
^
5"
o
0
V
0
0
0
V
0
o
0
t)
5*
/O
START TIME +
/Z-'ZCf
45
C)
o
V
D
o
o
0
n
o
o
0
o
0
0
o
s
O
O
o
Q
0
S
0
Q
e>
0
o
<0
o
0
AVERAGE OPACITY FOR
HIGHEST PERIOD 0-6 X. 5
VySfC
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
0
O
O
o
O
&
O
O
o
^
a
o
&
Q
O
^
o
o
o
O
O
TOP TIME
15
O
o
o
CD
O
0
0
5-
o
/
(O
o
o
o
0
o
o
0
0
o
o
/
€
/•
o
'O
^
30
^
o
0
o
0
Q
5
o
0
o
o
0
o
a
o
cf)
c
o
/
o
o
o
o
^
ft
o
g
s
o
o
45
c> •
o
o
0
p
CJ
0
^
o
o
Q
O
C3
0
O
O
o
o
o
0
^
0
o
^"
/
a
0
NUMBER OF READINGS ABOVE
0 % WERE $
RANGE OF OPACITY READINGS «
MINIMUM V MAXIMUM IO
OBSERVER'S NAME (PRINT) /r-\ ^ \ f \ )
^ysjn^si&v&s^
^/
-^.
DATE
OFtGANIZATIOrf^sr^. i
jytfcc l^c
CERTIFIED BY rr-TV*'
VERIFIED BY
DAT£ 5-/V-<»^
DATE
Quality Assurance Handbook M9-4.2
-------
Visible Emission Observation Form
\ Q
SOURCE NAME sfj . r * L
C
ADDRESS ' ///£)/./ £V J.} s
MuJ O>*jW //'// ™*
CITY 7i«k;*l
PHONE J
swrf//c
ZIP
SOURCE ID NUMBEl
PROCESS EQUIPMENT
CONTROL EQUIPMENT '
&**^ /}ffU 4 f-
DESCRIBE EMISSION POINT
t_ l/t . "/ft , .
START y / ^ / _L STOP
HEIGHT ABOVE GROUND LEVEL
START 35^" STOP trft
DISTANCE FROM OBSERVER
START HCO^ STOP 4*
CJ
OPERATING MODE
OPERA TING MODE
+ *
*
HEIGHT RELATIVE T(
START is ^ sr<
DIRECTION FROM
START >VA/Cv/sr
DESCRIBE EMISSIONS
START CtffCivl^ STOP
EMISSION COLOR
START y^V STOP 3**^
WA TER DROPLETS PRESENT.
NO&f YESO
<-,*«(
J
PLUME TYPE CON
FUGITIVE O INTER
OOBSERVER
OP ^pj**6
OBSERVER
OP 4^
r/A//yn/y^ R
MITT EN TO
IF WATER DROPLET PLUME-
ATT A CHED D DE TA CHED D
POINT IN THE PLUME A T WHICH OPACITY
START 3- 6 «b«V* <-fa\STOP
WAS DETERMINED
•***-
DESCRIBE BACKGROUND ^±
START -tset^/yfe STOP ^
BACKGROUND COLOR
S TARTLY STOP****
WIND SPEED ^
START d-l^P^-STOPl'l"
AMBIENT TEMP .->-.
START 8£> STOP OH
Source Layout Sketch
^ *
Sun-fy Wind-*.
Plume and — .1
Stack ^^<^-
-*^f~ ~~ -~jf?
SKY CONDITIONS
STARTfc*.rltca-
?
OBSERVA TIONS
DATE
(ssfflv/nr/owo-Arf
•f//V\
7
2
3
4
5
6
7
S
9
!0
; 1
12
73
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
0
O
O
O
/
o
o
o
0
0
^N
O
0
o
30
O <
O
O
o
0
O
^
^
O
o
0
o
o
o
6>
O
6
V
&&
o 1 o
0
O
O
O
ef
O
0
V
O
O
O
<£)
O
n
o
x
0
x
V
C
START TIME
45 1
O
C
<
o
O
O
o
/
O
O
D
O
t)
0
a
o
n
V
^>
O
o
o
n
6
0
D
O
• x
C
AVERAGE OPACITY FOR
HIGHEST PERIOD /.OH
nw\
37
32
33
34
35
36
37
35
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
0
C)
^
^
o
X
x^
0
o
X
X
o
J^--
o
X
-5"
o
0
£>
f /
/
/ x
/
/
/
y
srop ft/wf
75
^
^
o
c>
o
5"
x
30
D
^
D
o
S"
O
0
X
(^)
(0
o
(9
D
/ ,
/
J
/
f
/
o
x
0
o
n
n
o
o
'
/
/
/
/
/ I/
/
1 /
/
y
/
/
/
/
f
45
X
^)
(^
X
^
o
o
o
x
oV\CLvjJ
OBSERVER'S SIGNAW&E X
Oxirfe^?^^-
ORGANIZATION ^ ,-Cft /nc
CER TIFIED BY ^- f£L
VERIFIED BY
ox»rf 3,yq.^^
o>»rf
Quality Assurance Handbook M9-
-------
Visible Emission Observation Form
SOURCE NAME f. , . i
ADDRESS -' x / / /T> / / O/ l\
*f '/ / / / r" tLS / ^ / U 1 r I
fefWHr JirfAir g cfv*.5<- /vue'^A. rv y
WO/Vf ^
STAT£M
SOURCE
PROCESS EQUIPMENT
CONTROL EQUIPMENT
^e^^exJ'y^
DESCRIBED MISSION POINT
HEIGHT ABOVE GROUND LEVEL
START ^ ^ STOP 5«^vJU
DISTANCE FROM OBSERVER
START LJO D* STOP^ev^*
HEIGHT/
START
>, Z/P
^^
ID NUMBER
OPERA TING MODE
OPERA TING MODE
•so^^C--
RELATIVE TO OBSERVER
I1)**' STOP ^o^J*.
DIRECT/ ON FROM OBSERVER
START /1//1/V S/'OP'Sc*^j> _,
EMISSION COLO/f
START^/Ji^/ STOP $<**+&'
WATER DROPLETS PRESENT-
NO^ YESO
PLUME
FUGITIV
TYPE. CONTINUOUS tiS
E O INTERMITTENT Q
IF WA TER DROPLET PLUME:
ATTACHED^ DETACHEDO
POINT IN THE PLUME AT WHICH OPACITY WAS DETERMINED
/-> t fir "V
START 3"b ntf& tjt STOP 5ew^
DESCRIBE BACKGROUND
START Itttf'y STOP £,o>s~~*-
BACKGROUND COLOR
START «.
Stack ^W STOP-y^Ji-
WET BULB TEMP. RH.percent
Draw North Arrow
/ree£ s Q 2
Observers Bosilior)^' r^**-
_^-^"^ jWR* ^^^Z^^
^^^'
COMMENTS .
^ 't^V'c^ft^ •*'lLLf)C seylCC-, tr
^^^
1 HA VE RECEIVED A CO'PY OF THESE OPACITY OBSERVA TlONS
SIGNATURE
TITLE
DATE
BSERVATION DATE
^iK.
'
2
3
4
5
6
7
S
9
70
n
J2
/3
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
0
<£>
O
O
()
X
o
d>
x
c2
O
x
(9
XT)
£>
£>
O
P
D
O
O
o
^
/;
6
o
#
o
cv
0
0
/5
O
0
O
0
/
O
d>
O
O
O
0
0
O
o
0
o
£?
O
o
0
0
0
0
o
o
o
o
0
30
o
o
0
^
X
6»
V
O
0
O,
0
0
0
O
c>
£>
0
e
O
G>
^
O
p
(7
CO
£)
0
o
•o
SMflr r/Mf
•H'HI
45
0
O
0
O
O
o.
/
5"
O
•*-)
0
o
o
o
f=)
£>
o
D
t)
/
<9
c>
6
o
(9
O
o
O
A VERA GE OP A CITY FOR ~ ^>
HIGHES T PERIOD 0 . M ^
i$s
4;
32
33
34
35
36
37
35
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48.
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
55
59
60
0
X
-"""
^x
(0
^
O
O
^
o
0
<3
O
d>
srcw r/Mf
;s
X
x^
#
x
X
5~
X
^9
^?
&
O
0
o
O
x
0
<^
x
cy
0
o
o
o
o
o
0
45
C±)'
<^>
o
x*
x
O
o
O)
0
^
x
OBSERVER'S NAME (PRINT) T) , / /" f
^A^i a. cr»s>iav^
OflSggg^G/V^^X
°^£S-27-9 7-
ORGANIZATION •*T\1,r, _ /
]j£EcC> jnc.
CERTIFIED BY J^-f*£)
VERIFIED BY
o/« rf a^/v-^T-
£)>«/•£•
fc.
O
r
•s
— s
1
Quality Assurance Handbook M9-4.2
-------
Visible Emission Observation Form 2*c.
SOURCE /W»M^-Q v r
ADDRESS ^ /" \ V O
• \
*• /
<'.*-
C
LVfiV3X \ WaTJ A
• / /-I \ |J-\\ X?
/N£A n.'\\ ^
7\a'S.NOx\
SMrfA/C
i
z/^»
PHONE ^ SOURCE ID NUMBE/
PROCESS EQUIPMENT
DOA^OO^'
DESCRIBE EMISSION POINT"^
START r-\ TT"
START *-}CO STOP&xtr^e.
a
OP£/?/4 TING MODE
OPERA TING MODE
C
5^M
HEIGHT RELATIVE T
START IS ST
DIRECTION FROM
START */fJVS ST
DESCRIBE EMISSIONS .
START ( ff7?i/? J uptJ&/(Y STOP
EMISSION COLOR
START *)/£}/ STOP io.**^
WATERVRdPLETS PRESENT-
NO& YE SO
•£>
CVO^
e_,
D OBSERVER
DP5cxTr\C_ -
OBSERVER
OPt^x^*-
PLUME TYPE. CONTINUOUS B'
FUGITIVE O INTERMITTENT O
IF WA TER DROPLET PLUME:
ATT A CHED D Of TA CHED D
POINT IN THE PLUME A T WHICH OPACITY WAS DETERMINED
START 3 -6 abovt exv\57'c"3 * STOP <,<*-o">^-'
BACKGROUND COLOR
START tr-tfrjSTOPltmi-
WIND SP'EED
START 7-S""^ STOP $<"**-
AMBIENT TEMP
START S^, STOP &>
\
Source Layout Sketch
&
Sun-fy Wind.*.
Plume and —
SKY CONDITIONS,
, START £*J1T STOP'So^-A-
WET BULB TEMP.
RH. percent
^J*>lfc
^ 54 (f.^fti Mil &J)
Draw North Arrow
Emission Point
Observers Position
^-^^ I4O°
}
=3P=?
=^-
. — • ^-
COMMENTS . .^
*>U*>L\ '.ryj-ceffe^ M-fej re.r£rt C
i; (pX" sets.~ ^
I HAVE RECEIVED A COPY OF THESE OPACITY
SIGNA JURE
TITLE
^
OBSERVA TIONS
DATE
OBSERVATION DATE
8 -?8 '99
\SfCl
7
S
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
O
O
O
O
1
^
O
c)
o
X
X"
O
c)
V
0
o
o
o
0
o
s
c;
o
O
,x
X
d>
O
r
/5
O
O
o
o
o
o
X
0
o
O
^
£>
a
o
Q
}^*.
O
iO
o
/
C)
o
o
o
d>
x
X
(^>
X
£>
30
O
c^
Q
O
O <
O
0
^y
o
0
o
0
o
o
"O
5"
[)
c?
o
o
a
0
0
0
C9
X
X
t)
O
O'
START TIME
/O-' /O
45 \MIN\
O
O
O
o
O
*r
O_
O
o
o
o
C)
p)
n
o
CD
O
O
€>
O
ft
0
o
O
o
/
o
/
CD
* O
AVERAGE OPACITY FOR
> HIGHEST PERIOD £?•£?> %
A;
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
0
STOP TIME
15
o\/
O
'C
X
C
C
o
o
MAXIMUM / O
OBSERVER'S NAME (PRINT) "j~) '/ x^_ /
OBSERVER'S SIGNALLffl^.^^^/
- — i J " S' "^^^ ^Z^*^s J
__^^ — ^ X ^^ — ^-— ^*e_-A^X
DATE
ORGANIZA TlCfa *2feg£ & Jn C.
CERTIFIED BY C^fA
VERIFIED BY
OXirV/V-9?
DATE
"5T 3 /I,,'/
Quality Assurance Handbook M9
-------
Visible Emission Observation Form
2t>
SOURCE NAME *O J r~
tje\<\t\ouS-€- £>>
i /
i
AD/k££ir -PI*** "*" (khst &devcL PUvl ) *
'Wi^ Cft«0e / X7> //
C/nr%/V£
SOURCE
PROCESS EQUIPMENT
CONTROL ffOUIPMENT ', i
baqh6U4(_.
DESCRIBE EMISSION POINT
-.-.„_ wAlft /t4eWnAt/l4|%T_ .C
START CVJ<*fQ STOP S^rrQ
EMISSION COLOUR
WA TER DROPLETS PRESENT-
NO & YESO
PLUME TYPE CONTINUOUS SJ
FUGITIVE D INTERMITTENT O
IF WA TER DROPLET PLUME
ATTACHED® DETACHEDO
POINT IN THE PLUME A T WHICH OPACITY WAS DETERMINED
_ t-JfU . v|
START 3-^ «-K)Vt dC,TSrOP f >0.^€_
DESCRIBE BACKGROUND
START -{-s-ees STOP s<*>+~4^
BACKGROUND COLOR
START c.f£.en S TOP ^-""^
WIND SPEED ^ /
START 0-2Mf STOP 2-^
AMBIENT TEMP
START •?"?•- STOP & %>
Source Layout Sketch
&
Sun-fy Wind ^.
Plume and — ^^.
' ,
SKY CONDITIONS .
START STOP £
WET BULB TEMP
RH, percent
Draw North Arrow
-l
-emission Point
Observers Pys,
/
f9
*v
75
^
o
o
o
o
/
/
o
n
o
o
0
0
s>
o
o
0
X
t)
(9
0
0
o
o
o
o
o
o
c>
30
x
o
o
5-
o
X*
x
0
o
10
o
o
o
o
5
o
o
o
o
o
6"
(9
o
O
O
O
o
D
£)
X"
SMfl7 7/Mf
f 9'-C O
45
x
o
n
o
0
x^
o>
n
0
o
o
o
0
O
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
x
0
o
o
6
t>
o
'O
AVERAGE OPACITY FOR
HIGHEST PERIOD 0,83 /£
^
37
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
57
52
53
54
55
56
57
55
59
60
0
O
o
0
o
o
O
o
O
O
o
O
o
n
0
0
O
^
O
o
O
O
X
c
'£>
o
o
45
o
o
o
O"
X
o
o
o ;
0 -
o
0
o
o
o
o
o
o
^
x
*D
O
O
O
S"
o
o
^ ;
o
o
NUMBER OF READINGS ABOVf
O % WERE / O
RANGE OF OPACITY READINGS _
MINIMUM O MAXIMUM IL>
OBSERVER'S NAME (PftlNT^r\ VJ /" V
OBSERVER'S SlGNAIUJif^ ' J
DAT£ 8-28-99" ,
ORGANIZA TION *T)e£ff. [ A «
CERTIFIEDBY flfA
VERIFIED BY
°^3-"-<5* |
DATE
Quality Assurance Handbook M9-43
-------
Visible Emission Observation Form 0 4
SOURCE NAME f~) 1 £—
£**, house A^:
ADDRESS ' /-. 1 A O
thftMr 7Mivr"B CwJeSL /Tc
*;t
JieiqV
AXu; a«/*/ /V//7
c/rx >^
W>Uf/? DROPLETS PRESENT-
NO O YES®
PLUME TYPE: CONTINUOUS ti
FUGITIVE O INTERMITTENT O
IF WA TER DROPLET PLUME.
ATTACH EDO DETACHED&
POINT IN THE PLUME AT WHICH OPACITY WAS DETERMINED
DESCRIBE BACKGROUND
START ^rCC.^ STOP •5fttf£'
BACKGROUND COLOR
START ISW-n STOP-W^E'
WIND SP'EED . \
ft -J ^1/>v 1 2«p-
AMBIENT TEMP
START ^"b STOP ^~^T
* *r
Source Layout Sketch
£'
Sun-fy Wind.*
Plume and — ^^.
Siacj^—^^^^Sf—
SKY CONDITIONS
START ,,/e.e,^ STOP SQHFJ
WIND DIRECTION
START H' STOP t>ft*it
WET BULB JEM
p.
RH. percent
~*
Draw North Arrow
Jmission Point
Observer s£p&tion
^SwjaCSrfT/on Line
'
COMMENTS , ,
=^7
A A
US
"
/
15
o
0
o
o
o
o
D
D
0
O
0
O
O
O
U
0
o
/
o
0
O
O
o
o
o
o
o
0
O
0
30
O
5"
O
n
()
~o
o
o
o
D
O
O
o
o
0
X
•c>
o
O
o
0
/
O
o
o
O
o
o
o
o
o
D
o
/
O
AVERAGE OPACITY FOR
HIGHES T PERIOD O . Z O8 ?
^
37
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
5!
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
0
o
o
^
o
S
0
0
O
o
0
ro
o
o
0
o
o
0
c>
X
^x
O
OBSERVER'S NAME (PRINT )
DATE
Quality Assurance Handbook MS-
-------
Visible Emission Observation Form
SOURCE NAME •
ADDRESS
farMa- TLAI
H
CITY ftoAe^
B«X V\ EC
* v~ Q^. W«
*A-
:aW
<*
1 ossf /? vx» r/o/v 0-4 rf
lanV) /
^ Ckapel W;\\ ftj
W
PHONE
SMrfA
SOURCE
PROCESS EQUIPMENT
CONTROL EQUIPMENT ^
/c
ZIP
/O NUMBE
fl
OPERA TING MODE
OPERA TING MODE
DESCRIBE EMISSION POINT ,
START ' 5V"Qet ^ STOP ^>&-v^Si
HEIGHT ABOVE GRQUND LEVEL
START 3 S" ^STOP t>Gn£
DISTANCE FROM OBSERVER
START VCO ^STOP^a^,^
HEIGHT RELATIVE T
START /5" ST
DIRECTION FROM
START ^//ft IsJ ST
OOBSERVER
OP ^ftwwvfl—
OSSffll/5/?
OP 5«K*v>«_
DESCRIBE EMISSIONS
START c&Tjjsi^ isjot*JsS<*s*-Q~^
DESCRIBE BACKGROUND
START -ere**?, STOP 5«.nA4.
BACKGROUND COLOR
START I'eZS? STOP Soxwl-
WIND SPEED
START Z-fe*1^
STOP I-&*C
AMBIENT TEMP g#
START 85 STOP 4@&
Source
Sun-fy
Layout Sketch
&
Wind.*.
Plume and — JL
Stack ^^^-"^-^
COMMENTS
i
S/CX CONDITIONS
START ^KAy^ STOPicATtVieCl
WWD DIRECTION
START £&i>l S
WET BULB TEMP
Draw North
•*.. T^)
Jrmissi on Point
Observer f'Po&ip
jCT^^^^
paogSr """^
A
O
0
O
£>
o
6
c
O
n
D
o
O
/
D
0
O
O
o
o
D
^
o
o
S~
D
6-
O
d
0
o
\)
n
O
o
O
^^
c?
o
O
START TIMEltn
//•/B
45
O
o
/
o
/
o
o
o
T)
o
()
0
a
O
o
£>
/
o
,D
O
/
O
T>
/
D
O
C>
o
O
o
o
o
o
o
^
0
ro
30
D
0
c)
eg
O
o
d
G
c>
0
&
"c>
l*S
6
o
o
0
f}
o
r>
o
0
o
5-
(3
O
/
t)
d)
r>
D
o
s
o
c)
<9
V
-------
Visibjf Emission Observation Form
SOURCE NAME O i
ADDRESS O , i ,
(krtttLT TLbfilT "8" CW«*>T
Ex'
Ra.V
+
^ 'PI ^
AO^ ' I Ib
N/€uj CV\o.pe.\ VAi\\
V-( STOP SflMZ
BACKGROUND COLOR
START £)&£/? STOPstitfg
WIND 9t>EED ,
START O'l"*? STOP Scxr-r^
AMBIENT TEMP _^
START ?O STOP ~TV
Source Layout Sketch
Plume and —
Stack ^^^t+^
\r
rfr
TTJt
/
/ HAVE RECEIVED A COPY OF THESE OPACITY OBSERVATIONS
SIGNA TURE
TITLE
DXIT-f
BSERVATION DATE
*//vX
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
;5
76
77
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
0
a
0
'0
o
-^
o
o
O
O
'O
/o
0
O
0
'D
•o
O
O
0
o
o
o
o
V
S'
c
5
r>
S"
ID
15
O
O
o
5
0
O
o
o
/*
o
O
O
3
4
'0
O
/
O
o
o
a
O
-5
O
O
f)
£"
0
o
<;
30
O
o
0
o
0
0
o
0
^
5~~
o
o
0
c./
o
-r
o
o
O
o
nw\
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
5;
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
0
0
o
o
£
o
o
o
o
o
£}
/
o
o
0
o
o
c
o
o
0
0
o
a
c
5-
&
I D
O
O
O
TOP TIME
q;i3
75
0
0
<
o
0
0
o
o
0
o
o
o
o
o
o
6
o
o
0
r
o
o
o
o
5
o
5"
o
o
o
30
5"
cD
^
5~
O
d
o
er
/o
n
o
^
0
s"
^
O
o
t>
£)
O
CD
If)
O
5"
/£>
O
£.
O
(9
o
4
^
«
£
c
d
C
c
C
C
s
(
/
c
<
4
i
f,
c
(
i
i
i
<
^
_
NUMBER OF READINGS At
Z % WERE 1 H
RANGE OF OPACITY READINGS
MINIMUM O MAXIMUM 'O
OBSERVER'S NAME (PRINT/ /r\ - \ r \ ,
L£».\Md s^TD^aawJ
OBSERVER'S SIGgAfURE^/
DATEi e^v-i
ORGAN,ZATTON^£eco /^
CERTIFIED BY --y^
VERIFIED BY
Dx"£3-/v-9'
DATE
-------
Visibjf Emission Observation Form
SOURCE NAME^-) » .— \
>DQoOr\c>Ose- 1=0^
V
(
AfSnSr **«* "s" W*e>Y 1U^ *PU^ /
Nleo CWjof*\ V
C/TY Q . s .
PHONE °
\\\\ 1
SM7f A/C
SOURCE
PROCESS EQUIPMENT
CONTROL-fQUrniENT ^
DESCRIBE EMISSION POINT
HEIGHT ABOVE GROUND LEVEL
START 35^ STOP &) Mf
DISTANCE FROM OBSERVER
START ^QO STOP&.'-L
R:
I
ZIP
ID NUMBE
/7
OPERA TING MODE
OPERA TING MODE
5QW
HEIGHT RELATIVE T
START /5**" ST
DIRECTION FROM
START VAV Sr
DESCRIBE EMISSIONS
START cemir)^ STOP
EMISSION COLOR"
START Grey STOP^oiHt
WATER DROPLETS PRESENT
NO tf YE SO
^otmt
',
PLUME TYPE: CON
FUGITIVES INTEF
0 OBSERVER
OP tfME
OBSERVER
OP JftrfC
TINUOUS D
1MITTENT&
IF WA TER DROPLET PLUME'
ATTA CHED D Of 7» CWfD D
POINT IN THE PLUME AT WHICH OPACITY WAS DETERMINED
START 2-C\W.t^t STOP 2^f^lovt fjf^r
DESCRIBE BACKGROUND
START -/i-etr^, STOP 3'
BACKGROUND COLOR
START Jsefr} STOP *4m£.
WIND SPEED L
START /-3""/" STOP)'1)
AMBIENT TEMP
START J5^ STOP &\
Source Layout Sketch
Sun-fy Wind-*.
P/ume and — ^_^i.
Slack ^--K
ZZ^zzZZ
^±tM^
^t.
s^r CONDITIONS
STARTcleAf STOP C\e«*A.
WWO DIRECTION
START £<*'))• STOP $£
WE r BULB TEMP.
^£
^X^-S
p»dp«^
COMMENTS , / i /
$6er*>^ /SK/ScctfC*} ^T&rfs'et
^ctf
r
•7
O
$
O
<$
0
<5
0
D
(0
^
0
0
£T
O
O
/
P
O
n
o
o
D
O
O
0
/
C
rs
O
D
0
t)
O
o
o
^
o
o
*$
o
0
o
D
(5
O
0
n
0
^r
/O
O
Q
O
0
o
o
0
O
30
O
0
o
£}
O
n
O
o
o
^
o
£>
(2
O
O
/6?
O
0
o
o
s
o
o
./
S'
/o
o
o
o
o
SM^|£
45
S
P
£
O
o
4
O
O
O
0
D
o
5"
^
O
r
c>
O
o
jO
0
O
o
0
0
o
o
o
o
0
AVERAGE OPACITY FOR *?
HIGHES T PERIOD /.&?$/£
^N
37
32
33
34
35
35
37
35
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
57
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
0
O
o
r
0
/d
5
0
*o
O
O
0
o
0
&
o
•o
o
o
o
o
o
o
s
o
/t>
o
o
£)
0
O
O
o
o
o
0
/
o
o
o
0
0
o
o
(?)
o
o
NUMBER OF READINGS ABOVE
J % WERE £
RANGE OF OPACITY READINGS ~
MINIMUM O MAXIMUM ' CJ
OBSERVER'S NAME /PRINT)
-------
Visibjf Emission Observation Form 4|fe -* '
SOURCE NAME /ft / C~
C&^rt&j^e. £--J
« /
C
ADDRESS >^ i / /& 1 v / s7~)/ /\
A/teJ Chf&/M'll'£ll
C"r'%,ltM
PHONE '
SOURCE
PROCESS EQUIPMENT
C0tfTR0t EQUIPMENT
&et5fr ST(
DIRECT!
DESCRIBE EMISSIONS
START — CGfTJ'Vj STOP
EMISSION COLOR
START t^fty STOP $0.1*4^
WATER DROPLETS PRESENT:
NO (B^ YE SO
ON FROM
\->JkJ ST
<5«»i^--^
Z^
PLUME TYPE: CON
FUGITIVE D INTER
^OBSERVER
DP S.
Plume and — ^
SfacA^—^^^i^.
SKY CONDITIONS
START e_ tGcf STOPClCe*.*'
WIND DIRECTION
START ^^7 STOP -^"-^
WET BULB TEMP.
Draw North
JC mission Point
Observer sjfptfit
Son LocationUbne
COMMENTS „ . .
/^ ~tfl>'i«/ti> {lie 6T **>" ••
"
;J/o
1 HAVE RECEIVED A COPY OF THESE OPACITY
SIGNA TURE
TITLE
RH. percent
Arrow
rf\
on
OBSERVATIONS
DATE
OBSERVATION DATE
d
0
&
O
O
"O
0
£^
f7
dx
<
15
0
O
<5~
0
0
O '
o
O
O
o
<>
0
o
^
C_x
0
o
h
0
30
O
o
o
o
o
$•
3"
^
S"
o
o
x
o
o
u
10
D
>
D
^p
CJ
o
D
fo
> &
"&
o
o
D
O
START TIME
s#'33>
45 1
O
o
o
f")
o
o
o
s
0
o
n
o
o
u
V
/
O
0
&
o
o
o
o
o
0
25
5
0
O
uw\
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
SO
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
0
0 «
o
o
a
0
0
o
o
c
c)
o
o
o
0
o
0
5
X
o
o
x'
f)
o
D
O
O
o
o
s
5*
STOP TIME
15
O
cfD
o
5~
b
f)
o
o
&
^
10
O
S"
£>
O
0
O
c>
O
5
n
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
D
0
30
<9 (
O
O :
-------
Visible Emission Observation Form
Sun-fy
Plume and ~
Slack
— Observers Position
A VERA GE OP A CITY FOR
HIGHEST PERIOD 2.
NUMBER OF READINGS ABOVE
S % WERE
RANGE OF OPACITY READINGS
MINIMUM
_
MAXIMUM IO
OBSERVER'S
COMMENTS
., , ^ 1 I
'Ty s"f«£/,n<; '"*\ rf/f
DATE
/ HAVE RECEIVED A COPY OF THESE OPACITY OBSERVATIONS
SIGNA WRE
CERTIFIED BY
DATE
TITLE
OATE
VERIFIED BY
O/Uf
Quality Assurance
hnnt no * t
-------
FIELD DATA SHEET
Plant _
Sampling Location j
Run Number:
Date:
Sample Type:
Pbar:
CO2:
Operator:
Ps: ~
O2:
Nozzle ID:
Assumed Bws
Meter Box
Thermocouple #:
Filter #: //,/ j^ - r* '
Pretest Leak Rate: 0,00^ elm
Pretest Leak Check: Pilot: t^C-rsat:
. Hg.
Probe Length/Type:
Slack Diameter:
' x*/^ Pilot »:/>/?- Jo Post-Tesl Leak Rale: fl.g^ cfm @ ^ in. Hg.
av' As: Post-Test Leak Check: Pitol: v/ Orsal: c
-------
Page Z of 2-
Plant Name:
Run Number:
"g
Test Date:
Operator:
-------
Plant
Sampling
Run Number: Ql
"%"
lf(^TACkpbar:
Sample Type:
Operator:
Date:
CO2:
Ps: - -
02:
Nozzle ID: ...
Assumed Bws
Meter Box
Pretest Leak Bate: POT) cfm @ ll in. Hg. Probe Length/Type: 4'te^S5> Pilol #:
Thermocouple «• .
#:
Y:
Pretest Laak Check
POT) cfm
k: Pilot: J
Orsat:
Stack Diameter: 33?^ As:
Post-Test Leak Rate: Q&L ctm in. Hg.
Post-Tesl Leak Check: Pilot: >/Orsat:
-------
METHOD 23 CDD/CDF SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA
Plant: MS?/MCT ~Pi4*tr
Sample Date: S?/2.//7f
Sample Location: Ovi(-£(
Recovery Date:
V
Filler No.(s):
Run No.:
Job No.:
RUN 3
XAD-2 Trap No.(s):
Sample Recovery Person:
t;||^^|^i0t^t:;;^^ps
1
Impingers XAD - 2 (knockout)
Trap
Final wt. 316.3 /Z//; /
Initial wt. 303.~7 'l^lty.Q-*
Net wt. JL2-^— "}3CS
"Mt^Wsl&y ^££i??
Train System:
Probe:
Filter: Color -
«^MQ]is^r^bI^W*^ 'r •': rb^ciriptibn1^?/^.:*^^
Loading -
^'?^if^|S^^fi:^f^
4
(knockout) Silica gel
(untipped) (untipped)
603 2- 7/2. 2- a
, £J?.0 #&3- £ g
) 40- 434 g
cc •• •'•YlY-'Vr''-- "-';-y't J*| iy**' jj^-^'J'.''-';--. >'-v •'•'
,- : ,.-;••:-•-..•. ." '• v?.-T3 v*">i.->S.;-,;r^3VV!cs; v -.
\ C^.^arA^
^ J
Impinger Contents:
Silica Gel: @Grams Used -
Color - % Spent -
Condensate Observed In Front Half:
.-•-,*; l^^3&**-^-^\ Recovered Sample Fractions^
Filter Container No.
XAD Module Container No.:
Probe (FH) & Back Half Rinse (Acetone) Container No.:
Probe (FH) & Back Half Rinse (Toluene) Container No.:
Impinger Contents Container No.:
Impinger Rinse (Acetone/MeCI2) Container No.:
n;-ri.vv^r;^v^-lt^0::V
marked/sealed:
marked/sealed:
Liquid level
marked/sealed:
Liquid level
marked/sealed:
Liquid level
marked/sealed:
Liquid level
marked/sealed:
-------
Page 3 of
Plant Name:
Run Number:
Test Date:
Operator:
Traverse
Point
Number
Sampling /Clock Tim
Time, / (24-hour
(min.) / clock)
Gas Meter
Reading
Ob) ft)
Velocity
Ilead^P
in.IhO
Orifice Pres. Differential
(All) in. 11,0
Actual
Stack
Temp. •
Probe
Temp./ Filter
Temp* F
Impingcr
Temp.
•p
Dry Gas Meter Temp.
Inlet
(Juliet
Pump
Vacuum
In.llg
l(oO/O
Xfl-Ts
IV
/O
y-
/Or
JO&
,3,40
/ to
^^><
-------
Page A. of
Plant Name:
Run
^3~<
Test Date:
Operator:
-------
ritLU UM i A once i
Plant - fertrtHr TuDuT "g
Sampling Ucation Ao^koi^,*
Run Number: /H.H -o~l Date:
Pretest Leak Rate: £)>oe>^ cfrn
Sample Type:
Pbar.
CO2:
Operator:
Ps:
O2:
T Nozzle ID:,
Thermocouple #:
in. Hg.
Pretest Leak Check: Pilot: ^ Orsat:
Probe Length/Type:
Stack Diameter:
Pltot *•'
Assumed Bws: a.f- Filter *:
Meter Box #:/7jq/JL Y:
-------
METHOD 23 CDD/CDF SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA
•/) -,
Plant: /l$TH-*t,r r<-**rr *
Sample Date: £/2Jtys7 Filter No.(s):
DltTY fr~T fi/Jil ~7
Sample Location: (-/(// uZ- / /\l//v c—
Run No.:
Job No.:
Recovery Date: XAD-2 Trap No.(s):
Sample RecoveryTerson:
> ^^^^i^:\^^^^^^^^^^-
1 2 3
Impingers XAD-2 (knockout) (100mlH2O) (100mlH
Trap (untipped) (tippec
Final wt. <^3, / ?4^.2. 3tf£ 4 J/G.O
Initial wt. *j-2% & $&?•*•• 691.7 6^Z.t
Netwt. 3>j.( *v y. £ ^7Y> 7 Z^JfJ'?
V^yctWK^ *&$&?£i ^':'^kb' Js^ptidnS^
v;--'V"o'^;^'li^r.«
4
I2O) (knockout)
i) (untipped)
' 6&Z.
> 60d. %
'~*_ _ ._ j i/*\ f\
if y« cj
s-^-'^p»*t
Train System: ~~
•£j.§V?:^^Hv
Silica gel
(untipped)
?WJ.5 q
^/If a
L ^ zfaj^jj^^-*-
•> lfoS^O.%
__;
Probe:
Filter: Color - Loading -
Impinger Contents:
Silica Gel: @Grams Used - Color -
% Spent -
Condensate Observed In Front Half:
. V-^- S v"^-^^"-'"- .^:''~i--^:v^ecov6r?diSaniplei:ractip ;--"~>
Filter Container No.
XAD Module Container No.:
Probe (FH) & Back Half Rinse (Acetone) Container No.:
Probe (FH) & Back Half Rinse (Toluene) Container No.:
Impinger Contents Container No.:
Impinger Rinse (Acetone/MeCI2) Container No.:
marked/sealed:
marked/sealed:
Liquid level
marked/sealed:
Liquid level
marked/sealed:
Liquid level
marked/sealed:
Liquid level
marked/sealed:
*~4
4*C.?***
-------
Page
Of 2-
Plant Name:
Run
>
Test Date: _.
Operator: _j
-------
FIELD DATA SHEET
Plant _
Sampling Location
Run Number:
"e"
Date:
Pretest Leak Rate: a.ooi dm@ /£& in. Hg. Probe Length/Type:
Pretest Leak Check: Pilot: •/ Orsat: ±/ Slack Diameter:
Sample Type: /f i"b Operator: tTt^P*.^ Nozzle ID: 0.-2.&* Thermocouple #:
Pbar ??.<-»Q Ps: ~b,jf Assumed Bws: _32^Fifter ^;
CO2: O2: Meter Box #: A>1g/^-
Post-Tesl Leak Rale:
Pitot *:
f'fcfm @ /£ in.
As- /6.2/m^ft. Post-Test Leak Check: Pilot: ^Xbrsal:
* K=3-3b
XAD
-------
METHOD 23 CDD/CDF SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA
Plant: AsnHhr Tbhttr "V Run No.:
Sample Date:
Filter No.(s): Job No.:
Sample Location: 0 V I LLI "7/7
Recovery Date:
XAD-2 Trap No.(s):
Sample Recovery Person:
•^^ " :" r';""'- -•-"-"--;.' •'•-'' ' v:* -:^''-' ;i^V- wMbisture^ V^:-'^ &; --^XK^;^.;
Impingers
Final wt.
Initial wt.
Netwt.
XAD-2
Trap
l
z^.e
3
(100mlH2O)
(tipped)
xch &
£%.K
\\i-0
4
(knockout)
(untipped)
K02.7
5^0,7
4.0
Silica gel
(untipped)
^2.0
7/7?
S4-1-
g
q
q
Train System:
Probe:
Filter: Color -
Loading -
Impinger Contents:
Silica Gel: @Grams Used -
Color-
% Spent -
Condensate Observed In Front Half:
Recovered Sample Fractions
Filter Container No.
marked/sealed:
XAD Module Container No.:
marked/sealed:
Probe (FH) & Back Half Rinse (Acetone) Container No.
Liquid level
marked/sealed:
Probe (FH) & Back Half Rinse (Toluene) Container No.
Liquid level
marked/sealed:
Impinger Contents Container No.:
Liquid level
marked/sealed:
ImpieggrRinse (Acetone/MeCI2) Container No.
97*.e
Liquid level
marked/sealed:
r ^ 3
<* —*, -^
-------
Page
of
Plant Name:
Run Number:
"g
Test Date: _
Operator:
Traverse
Point
Number
Sampling
Time,
fari*v
L
Clock Time
(24-hour
clock)
Gas Meter
Reading
(*>«'
Velocity
llead^P.)
faklhO
Orifice Pres. Differential
Actual
Stack
Temp. • F
Probe
Temp./ Tiller
Temp* F
Impinger
Temp.
•F
Dry Oaa Meter Temp.
Inlet
Uulicl
Pump
Vacuum
/.3d
l&G
s
o?/?
'
LC
26'
m
,
"
/.7C
117
.57
/. 76
/1 7
7/3
*/• 3
78
S
£-1
6 7.
//z
2L
V
4-
ZL
JL
MS-
-------
Page
of
Plant Name:
Run
n*«r «*
Test Date: _.
-------
MULTI-METALS SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA
lant:
"Pvker V
Run No.:
Date:
Sample Box No.:
Job No.:
Sample Location: £)<_m-£:T~
Sample Type: tA2°(
Sample Recovery Person:
Container
Description
Volume, ml Sealed/Level Marked
Filter No. (s)
. 6\3>
Acetone Rinse
Nitric Rinse
Nitric Rinse - Imp. 1 ,2,3, + Back 1/2 Filter
**"
5A
Nitric Rinse - Impinger No. 4
5B
KMNO4/H2O Rinse - Impingers 5 & 6
5C
HCI Rinse - Impingers 5 & 6
Impinger
No.
Contents
Initial
Volume, ml
Initial
Weight, grams
Final
7-218.3
1 60
732
/oo
Zll./
52,8.7
1OO
^31.3
7-
Total
3
Comments:
-------
Plant _ h^>THftcr "R./WT "g"
FIELD DATA SHEET
Operator:
Run Number: CTL Date: g-^fl^n
Pretest Leak Rate: .Q<( cfm © JO in, Hg.
Pretest Leak Check: Pilot: \/ Orsat:
Sample Type:
Pbar 3*\.L
CO2: __.
Probe Length/Type: ^ '6(/»s$ Pilot #:
Stack Diameter: $?/H^ As:
Ps:
O2:
Nozzle ID: .'Z'5"2- Thermocouple #:
Assumed Bws: jZ-T^ Filter #:
Meter Box #:A/U?«0 Y:/
Post-Test Leak Rate: .<%)S~ cfm @7_ in. Hg.
Post-Test Leak Check: Pilot: ^/ Orsat: ^
V.locity
Hwd(Ap)
inHSO
Oriffce Pressure Drfterenbal
(AH) In H2O
Desired | Actual
Stack
Temp.
Temperature
°F
Probe
Fitter
Impinger
Temp.
°F
Dry Gas Meier Temp.
Inlet
(Tmln°F)
Outlet
(Tmout°F)
Pump I
Vacuum
On. HJJ)
¥
<97fl
SI "7-2.
Sv
25?
24-7
2.7
M-C
71
.JT
J^LL
2=10
5&
tfG
7,**
TsT
l.U
.kSH
oc
%
i.u
"2 so
1
-------
Page 2 of
Plant Name:
Run Number:
"x
02-
Test Date:
Operator:
inverse
Point
Number
Sampling /dock Time
Time, / (24-hour
(min.) / dock)
It 09
Gas Meter
Reading
Velocity
Head (P.)
IlLlhO
Orifice Pres. Differential Stack
(all) in. 11,0 Temp. • F
Desired I Actual | (I)
Probe I Impinger
Temp./ Filler I Temp.
Temp." F * F
Dry Gas Meter Temp.
Inlet
UUllCt
Pump
Vacuum
-725
fD
tfO
i tOM
—I
101
7
Vtl
' lO
»
STL,
.T?
/ /03
-------
MULTI-METALS SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA
lant:
Tutor "8"
Run No.:
Date:
Sample Box No.:
Job No.:
Sample Location:
ample Type:
A/( Z9
Sample Recovery Person: :5".
Container Description
Volume, ml Sealed/Level Marked
Filter No.(s)
Acetone Rinse
^--;;:s5 *"^^j^o^g,*..-'S*fcVi:'W <:.i'-.v->1'iX~>V; ~,y~ ,^" -"—v*j~*- ffife-r-ow* -„•**•.•
Nitric Rinse - Imp. 1 ,2,3, + Back 1/2 Filter
5A
Nitric Rinse - Impinger No. 4
5B
KMNO4/H2O Rinse - Impingers 5 & 6
5C
HCI Rinse - Impingers 5 & 6
Impinger
No.
Contents
Initial
Volume, ml
Weight, grams
Initial
Final
731-3
/eo
\4-1-T
5
7-0
i.
7
Total
}
Comments:
-------
FIELD DATA SHEET
Plant .^^
Sampling Location gp^HCUcXr
Run Number:
Tfr/WT "g "
Dale: &-t-f-ll
Pretest Leak Rate: £)\t elm @1 _ in. Hg.
PrateBt Leak Check: Pitot: / Orsat: •
Sample Type:
Operator:
CO2:
Ps: — .
O2:
Nozzle ID: . 2.$"2- Thermocouple #:
Assumed BwsL^uS" Filter #:
Meter Box #:
Q Y:
Probe Length/Type:
Stack Diameter:
As:
Post-Test Leak Rate:. Qgf cfm @u_ in. Hg.
Post-Test Leak Check: PHol: ,/ Orsat.,
-------
Page 7. of
Plant Name:
Run Number:
"g"
03,
Test Date: _
Operator:
Sampling /dock Time I Gas Meter
I Reading
Velocity I Orifice Pres. Differential
Head*?,)! (all) m. 11,0
in. IhO | Desired | Actual
Stack Probe
Temp. • FJ Temp. / Filter
(T) I Temp.'F
Impinger
Temp.
•F
Dry Gas Meter Temp.
Inlet
UUllCl
Pump
Vacuum
n^
•7^7 /
101
~7c^
id)
58
•17
26^
57
3.
too
5-65"
ss.
11
to7
3S
u
11
I
no
-zfls"
DSL
"Z63
ML,
in
UR
ill-
to
TO/
1C?
lit
ZL
ia
-------
MULTI-METALS SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA
Plant: -A-sTWfcr "?t/?*/r ""S"
Date: S/^?/*?7-
Sample Box No.:
Run No.: 3
Job No.:
Sample Location: OUTLET"
Sample Type: M 23
Sample Recovery Person: 'S fAerfcG./Wfx.)
Container Description Volume, ml
Sealed/Level Marked
!^^^&^^^^^^^^^^^^^^'^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^SI^^S^^&^^i
1 Filter No.(s)
2 Acetone Rinse
3 Nitric Rinse
4 Nitric Rinse - Imp. 1 ,2,3, + Back 1/2 Filter
5A Nitric Rinse - Impinger No. 4
5B KMNO4/H2O Rinse - Impingers 5 & 6
5C HCI Rinse - Impingers 5 & 6
Impinger
No.
I
2.
3
H
TV
&%l\&7*
5*)* //o%
jgMM
kHwO^
K^CN
5ca
Initial
Volume, ml
^
/eo
/GO
^
/eo
/OD
N//V
Weight, grams
Initial
^SI.CP
TZ0.0
W*X
5-73.0
*tir\y • .^
*T.^tW ^5
^j ^Tl ^
Final
/£/7.3
9n2 e,
79 /. T
/" ^Q /"
fc» ^/y J<9
75xf?
99H.D
-r*t*u-
Net
&8f>7
f&2.&
_+++^**n
8,^
-^•7
^j,-2-
37,8
UH7. \
1 ^"J 1J 7\
Comments:
-------
FIELD DATA SHEET
Plant
Samp
RunN
Pretes
Pretea
Traveree
Poet!
.— ™»^ «
.^^^•••••^•»
v-',AsFMffcr ~Pu™r"B
ling Loot
umber: 1
tLeakR
tLeakC
Sampling
Time
i— ^^•^«^-^—
.^^•••11 '
ibonJWjtfcU^ ^-U-
"/6 1 Date- S-'2-
ate:>QI^ elm @ IO
"/• Sample Type. M.-Z3 Operator. MJbA
£fteJ<~' Pbar {-^ £? P«: ^^
e^O no?- O2:
in.
heck: Pitot: f>\g> Orsat: N/>>
CtockTIme
(24-hour
dock)
i. i i i .1
Gas Meter
Reading
(Vmjfl3
(&} SH^
^^' ' >J '
/
4
(^ .I^U
Hg. Probe 1
__ Stack C
Velocity
Head(Ap)
kiH2O
Length/Type: *•( ^jUv^ Pitol #: K/^
)iameter:
t*jkf^ As: v^^
Oidce Pressure Drfterential
(AH) in H2O
Desired | Actual
Stack
Temp.
(Ts)
Nozzle ID: .2-iC' Thermocouple ^: >()
Assumed Bws: |LKQ Filter #:
Meter Box #: Y:
Post-Test Leak Rate:.ep^-
Post-Test Leak Check: Pilot:.
Temperature
°F
Probe
Filter
Impinger
Temp.
°F
ory (iasM
Inlet
(Tmin°F)
AH@:
cfm @{p in. Hg.
^l\IODrsat: M ft
later Temp.
Outlet
(Tm out°F)
1 ; s / s s J
Vacuum
PO.HB)
'/////////////////////////////////////////////S////////'''"'''
.oi\~^
u
*=zr —
* —
•-•
-••
-.
-------
METHOD 23 CDD/CDF SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA
Plant: r\ sf/w/r Ti^ur "g"
Sample Date: a^1t^^^
1 2 3
Impingers XAD-2 (knockout) (100mlH2O) (100 mil-
Trap (untipped) (tippec
Final wt. +60.0 509. G 706. £ 7(0.1
Initial wt. f-5%350J.7 70 6. & 7 1 0 ."
Netwt.
•%ig^^^f:iv^^^
v:: -,^4" [^^spr-gi
4
I2O) (knockout)
i) (untipped)
7 COO. 0
1 572 °l
V'.:£^Jr :• '^^viD.^-^jf •
Silica gel
(untipped)
JWC g
9W.O 9
g
'"•«•*£- -''.'; r""r. ""^'{^.^-"-••'•Viv''" "
Train System:
Probe:
Filter: Color- Loading -
Impinger Contents:
Silica Gel: @Grams Used - Color -
% Spent -
Condensate Observed In Front Half:
--•-.f"''^- ^i" >-"-'-' -•*';•.. -• " •-• >--•'"•--, . --. ^ ^-i;C'vc • --- •. JI»"----:"-.-i v-jii '••";'.
:' -i : ' ;- v" : . x Recovered Sample rracti<
Filter Container No.
XAD Module Container No.:
Probe (FH) & Back Half Rinse (Acetone) Container No.:
Probe (FH) & Back Half Rinse (Toluene) Container No.:
Impinger Contents Container No.:
Impinger Rinse (Acetone/MeCI2) Container No.:
jnsf'-^^v^-"'^.
"O?^.1:" '^d'v'^"'V!,"}
marked/sealed:
marked/sealed:
Liquid level
marked/sealed:
Liquid level
marked/sealed:
Liquid level
marked/sealed:
Liquid level
marked/sealed:
-------
(
l-o
2 i
Page
Plant Name:
Run Number:
Test Date:
Operator:
Traverse
Point
Number
1 ,,x
/^/
&w
Sampling /dock Time
Thne, / (24-hour
(rain.) / clock)
jfafr 1
$&> 1
1
1
7^ / Ai JA^
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
Oas Meier
Reading
flMft*
"/flr./st
1/1.^0
-?/Y, c'^
-)A,6d-
^7J/.^3^
, 4,<3S
Vetociry
llead^P,
ialhO
0^
O.H±
a
/r
Orifice Prcs. Differential
(Oil) in. 11,0
Desired
ML /'
V6 '^
1 .
Actual
I"
^
Slack
Temp. • F
m
a^2L
si^r
3*1
310
Probe
Temp. / Filler
Temp* F
/
~^3>l '5^t
^i Ox
DV7 Of,
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
Impinger
Temp.
•F
u
rc
<;o
Dry Gas Meier Temp.
Inlet
(*ta)'F
kr
U
?0
Vc>
^c?
UUllCl
f^J'P
^1
^r7
fft
c?r
K
^LtL
0 t^ 'V?
Pump
In.llg
T
/
r?
5^
-------
MULTI-METALS SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA
Plant: •'<-<-' "AsFtf/fcr "Puwr "ff" Run No.: r£
Date: ©|^7f97- Sample Box No.: Job No.:
Sample Location: AJ/A
Sample Type: M 23
Sample Recovery Person: "S". Mj&te£;ArN|
Container Description Volume, ml
Sealed/Level Marked
1 Filter No.(s) hW.oiT-
2 Acetone Rinse
3 Nitric Rinse
4 Nitric Rinse - Imp. 1 ,2,3, + Back 1/2 Filter
5A Nitric Rinse - Impinger No. 4
5B KMNO4/H2O Rinse - Impingers 5 & 6
5C HCI Rinse - Impingers 5 & 6
Impinger
No.
/
2.
3
q
5"
4
7.
Total
Contents
^MP-ry
5^/io°7o
S^|/o<%
E"rA ^T^l
j^NA Q,,
K/A^Oq
sc^
Initial
Volume, ml
0f
l&O
too
er
loo
teo
N/A-
Weight, grams
Initial
72V. (,
127.-2.
155. l
62.^,1
^iPf
P^%
§67.7
4"
V - , ' '
Final
ry/7 <| ^ /
?^7.2-
"f ^ S • £,+-
f *7 *? I
lfi®--Z
f-37./
^«.7^
• '
Net
^
^
ft./
^
o.t
0-5"
0-5"
1-3
Comments:
------- |