«B EPA-340/1 -85-008
-------
EPA-340/1 -85-008
NESHAPs
Asbestos Demolition and Renovation
Inspection Workshop Manual
Final Report
By
Stephen Piper
Marc Grant
GCA Corporation
GC A/Tech no logy Division
Bedford, Massachusetts 01730
Contract No. 68-01-3961
EPA Project Officer: John Busik
EPA Work Assignment Manager: Robert Myers
Stationary Source Compliance Division
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Washington, DC 20460
December 1984 y s Environmental Protection Agency
Region 5, Library (PL-12J)
77 West Jackson Boulevard, 12th Ftoor
Chicago, II 60604-3590
-------
DISCLAIMER
This Final Report was furnished to the Environmental Protection Agency by
the GCA Corporation, GCA/Technology Division, Bedford, Massachusetts 01730, in
partial fulfillment of Contract Ho. 68-02-3961, Assignment No. 6. The
opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed are those of tne authors and not
necessarily those of trie Environmental Protection Agency or the cooperating
agencies. Mention of company or product names is not to be considered as an
endorsement by the Environmental Protection Agency.
PEER REVIEW STATUS
This document has been peer reviewed by the Environmental Protection
Agency following its presentation at the April 10-11, 1984 Regional Workshop
at New York, NY. Peer reviewers were Peter Flynn, EPA-Region II,
Catherine McNair, EPA-Region I, and Tom Elter, EPA-Region I.
11
-------
CONTENTS
Acknowledgements v
1. Introduction 1
Purpose of Workshop 1
Workshop Approach 2
2. Background Information 3
NESHAPs Program 3
Description of Mineral 4
Health Effects 7
Regulatory History 10
Asbestos Sources 12
3. National Regulatory Strategy 14
Objectives 14
Background 14
Strategy 15
4. Demolition and Renovation Regulations 20
Definitions 20
Applicability of Standard 22
Notification Requirements 22
Procedures for Asbestos Emission Control 25
Air Cleaning Control Devices 28
Waste Disposal 30
Future Developments - Possible Revisions 35
5. Asbestos in Schools 37
Background 37
Requirements 38
Abatement Techniques 42
Future Developments 47
6. OSHA Asbestos Program 51
Background 51
Regulatory History 51
OSHA Asbestos Standard 53
Future Revisions Concerning the Construction Industry . . 58
7. Safety Equipment 61
Background 61
Protective Equipment 61
Equipment Use 65
Safety Precautions 66
m
-------
CONTENTS (continued)
8. Asbestos NESHAP Inspections Legal Perspectives b8
General 68
Types of Evidence 71
b>. Demolition and Renovation Onsite Investigation 74
Background 74
Inspection Equipment Checklist 75
Pre-Entry Observations and Preparations 77
Site Entry 77
Pre-Inspection Interview 78
Identifying Friable Materials 79
Demolition and Renovation - Emission Sources 81
Emission Control Options 81
Negative Air System 82
Field Data Collection Checklist 84
Post Inspection Interview 87
Site Exit Observations 88
Inspection of Landfill or Waste Disposal Site 88
Disposal Site Field Data Collection Checklist 89
10. Asbestos Bulk Sampling 94
Purpose 94
Protective Equipment 94
Sampling Equipment 95
Site Selection 9u
Collection Metnods 97
Cleanup Procedures 98
Quality Assurance 98
11. Laboratory Analysis 101
Introduction 101
Analysis Methods 101
QA and Reporting 104
12. Asbestos Inspection Experience 107
Asoestos References 110
Appendices
A. National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
Subpart M - Asbestos 113
B. Asbestos Sources - Field Data Collection Checklists 122
C. Asbestos - NESHAPs Applicability Determinations 129
IV
-------
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
GCA wishes to thank the EPA peer reviewers, Peter Flynn,
Catherine McNair, and Tom Elter, for their comments and corrections on the
Preliminary Draft Document. GCA extends special thanks to the following
personnel for their contributions to the Regional Workshop, and for comments
and assistance during preparation of this Draft Final Report:
Bob Myers, EPA Assignment Manager
Mike Yarnell, OSHA Industrial Health Supervisor
Howard Stecker, EPA Demolition/Renovation Inspector
-------
1. INTRODUCTION
PURPOSE OF WORKSHOP
Promulgation of amendments to the national emission standard for
asbestos, which were proposed in the Federal Register on July 13, 1983
(48 FR 32126), occurred on April 5, 1984 (49 FR 13661). The intended effect
of the amendments is to reinstate work practice and equipment provisions of
the asbestos standard that were held not to be emission standards by the
U.S. Supreme Court in 1978. The objective of this workshop is to provide a
consistent understanding of the asbestos regulations as they pertain to
demolition and renovation projects. The workshop is being sponsored by EPA
Regional Agencies in cooperation with state and local air pollution control
agencies.
-------
WORKSHOP APPROACH
Speakers from GCA and sponsoring EPA agencies will present information
pertaining to the following subject areas during the one-day classroom phase
of the workshop:
t Background Information - Asbestos
• National Regulatory Strategy
t Demolition and Renovation Regulations
• TSCA Asbestos in Schools Program
• OSHA Asbestos Program
• Safety Equipment
• Asbestos NESHAP Inspections Legal Perspectives
• Demolition and Renovation Inspection Procedures
t Bulk Sampling
• Analysis of Asbestos
• Asbestos Inspection Experience
Onsite inspections of demolition and/or renovation projects will be conducted
during the second day of this workshop, if scheduled.
-------
2. BACKGROUND INFORMATION
NESHAPs PROGRAM
ASBESTOS FEDERAL REGULATIONS
OS HA
OCCUPATIONAL
EXPOSURE
DEMOLITION &
RENOVATION
WORKERS
CAA
NESHAPs
ASBESTOS
DEMOLITION &
RENOVATION
EPA
TSCA
SCHOOLS
PROGRAM
t The EPA regulates asbestos under the National Emissions Standards
For Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPs) which is listed as
Section 112 of the Clean Air Act (CAA).
Hazardous pollutant has been defined as "an air pollutant to which
no ambient air quality standard is applicable and which in the
judgement of the Administrator causes, or contributes to, air
pollution which may reasonably be anticipated to result in an
increase in mortality or an increase in serious irreversible, or
incapacitating reversible, illness."
-------
• The NESHAPs program currently regulates Benzene, Beryllium, Mercury,
and Vinyl Chloride along with Asbestos.
• The purpose of the NESHAPs program is to protect the public from
exposure to Asbestos in the ambient air. For the purpose of this
workshop, the NESHAPs program is examined as it pertains to
demolition and renovation operations.
• Other Federal regulations related to demolition and renovation
include:
OSHA, which regulates asbestos exposure for all workers,
including construction (demolition and renovation) workers.
TSCA, which regulates the Asbestos In Schools program requiring
notification and identification of asbestos and giving
guidelines for abatement.
DESCRIPTION OF MINERAL
Definition of Asbestos
• Asbestos forms as veins in rocks of two mineral groups, serpentine
and amphibole.
-------
ASBESTOS
SERPENT
CHRYSt
(WHITE A,
1
INE GROUP
DTILE
SBESTOS) 1
CUMMINGTONITE -
GRUNERITE
(BROWN ASBESTOS)
AMPHIBO
_E GROUP
1 1
RIEBECKITE ANTHOPHYLLITE
(CROCIDOLITE) ASBESTOS
(BLUE ASBESTOS)
1
ACTINOLITE
TREMOLITE
ASBESTOS
• With respect to the NESHAP standard, asbestos refers to the above
five commercially viable, naturally formed hydrated silicates.
• The definition of asbestos has been expanded to a more geologically
correct form. The categories now identified are the general groups
under which the asbestiform or fiberous varieties are listed. For
example, amosite is a fiberous form under the cummingtonite-
grunerite group.
Asbestos Properties
Asbestos fibers are noncombustible, resistant to corrosion and
degradation, have relatively high tensile strength, are chemically
and thermally stable, and have low thermal and electrical
conductivities.
-------
t These properties make asbestos fibers desirable for use in the
manufacture of many industrial and commercial products. In fact, it
has been estimated that asbestos fibers have been used in the
manufacture of 2,000 to 3,000 distinct industrial and commercial
products.
Asbestos Consumption
• United States consumption data provided by The Bureau of Mines
reveals that chrysotile usage accounted for approximately 97 percent
of the total asbestos consumed in 1983. This trend still exists
today and will likely continue into the near future, because of
chrysotile's greater availability and utility compared to the other
varieties.
• Over the past several years asbestos consumption in the
United States has declined steadily. The decline is most likely due
to greater awareness of its serious health effects, increasing
regulatory control, and in part, recent declines in the economy.
• Approximately 80 percent of the asbestos consumed in this country is
imported from Canada, while the remainder is mined at three United
States locations, two in California and one in Vermont.
-------
HEALTH EFFECTS
Asbestos is a known environmental carcinogen and innalation of asbestos
fioers may increase the risk of serious irreversible diseases, which can
include:
Lung Cancer--A respiratory malignancy. Studies have shown the risk of
lung cancer increases directly with increasing cumulative exposure.
Asbestosis--A noncancerous respiratory disease characterized by scarring
of the lung tissue. Asbestosis is a chronic irreversible lung ailment
that can produce shortness of breath and lung damage.
Mesothelioma--Rare cancer that involves the thin membrane lining of the
chest and abdomen. Mesotnelioma has been observed almost exclusively
when there has been a history of exposure to asbestos. Also, the earlier
one begins innaling asbestos, tne higher the likelihood of developing
mesothelioma in later life. Thus, there is concern over exposure of
school children to asbestos.
Other Cancer--It is suspected that exposure to asbestos fibers may cause
malignant tumors or cancer of the esophagus, larynx, oral cavity,
stomach, colon, kidney, and other vital organs. Based on this,
scientists conclude that asbestos fibers that are inhaled are absorbed
into the blood stream and carried to parts of the body.
-------
Researchers report that there does not appear to be a safe level of
exposure to asbestos. A consensus of opinion has not been reached
concerning the causal relationship between malignant or nonmalignant
respiratory diseases and the following exposure parameters:
Fiber size,
Fiber type;
Fiber concentration, and
Duration of exposure.
It has been predicted (Dr. Irving Selikoff, Mt. Sinai Hospital) that
between now and the end of the century, an American will die of
asbestos-related disease every hour, a death toll of nearly 200,000.
Pathways of Exposure
There are three basic routes of exposure wnich could result in inhalation
of asbestos fibers:
iteighborriood Exposure—Pathway explicitly addressed by the asbestos
NESHAP standard. Neighborhood exposure can result from people living or
worKing near asoestos mines, asbestos manufacturing or fabricating
plants, buildings containing asoestos that will be demolished or
renovated, or living or working near a site where equipment or machinery
is sprayed with an asbestos-containing fireproofing or insulating
material.
-------
Occupational Exposure—This pathway includes:
• Direct occupational exposure, resulting from working in asbestos
mines, asbestos mills, or asbestos manufacturing or fabricating
plants.
t Indirect occupational exposure, resulting from working with
asbestos-containing products such as construction workers, auto
mechanics, roofers, demolition and renovation contractors.
Indirect occupational exposure also results from people working in
the vicinity where material containing asbestos has been disturbed.
For example, electricians or plumbers who might cut through
asbestos-containing material to install or repair wiring or pipes.
• Para-Occupational Exposure. This involves being exposed
unknowingly. Examples include family members of workers exposed
either directly or indirectly on the job. Under this situation,
asbestos fibers are brought into the household on work clothes that
have not been decontaminated.
Another para-occupational exposure pathway results from the release
of asbestos fibers from friable asbestos materials applied in
buildings that are deteriorating or have been disturbed. This can
occur in schools, public meeting rooms, offices, airport terminals,
gymnasiums, cafeterias, libraries, and many other locations.
-------
Ambient Background Exposure—Asbestos exposure by this pathway results
from the release of fibers from the weathering of exposed
asbestos-bearing rocks, and the general release of fibers from the use or
weathering of such products as brake linings or exterior construction
products that contain asbestos, such as shingles or cladding.
REGULATORY HISTORY
The Asbestos NESHAP regulation has been amended several times. The
following dates and information highlight the progress of the regulation to
date:
• April 6, 1973 - Original promulgation. Original regulations covered:
Asbestos mills;
Nine (9) manufacturing source categories;
Demolition of buildings containing friable asbestos-containing
fireproofing and insulating material;
Restriction on the spraying of asbestos-containing materials on
buildings and structures for fireproofing and insulating
purposes, and
Restriction on surfacing of roadways with asbestos tailings.
10
-------
• May 3, 1974 - Regulations were amended to expand coverage.
Amendments included:
Clarification of definitions;
Expansion of demolition provisions;
Clarified no visible emission standard to exclude uncombined
water from regulatory requirement.
• October 14, 1975 - Substantial changes were made. The new
amendments included:
Addition of two (2) new manufacturing source categories,
bringing total to eleven (11);
Inclusion of renovation projects with regulated demolition
activities;
Added new activity to be regulated - 'Fabrication1 of
asbestos-containing products;
Adopted provision to prohibit use of wet applied and molded
insulation (e.g., pipe lagging);
Expanded scope of regulation to cover asbestos-containing waste
handling and disposal.
• March 2, 1977 - Subtle changes, mostly addressing definitions.
• June 19, 1978 Important changes made include:
Expanded coverage of spraying restriction to prohibit
application of asbestos-containing materials for decorative
purposes.
11
-------
Adopted provision to exempt bituminous or resinous-based
materials from the spraying restrictions.
Repromulgated certain work practice provisions.
• April 5, 1984 - Repromulgation to make existing work practices
enforceable. The need to repromulgate stemmed from a Supreme Court
decision in the case of Adamo Wrecking Company of Michigan versus
United States. The court held that parts of the asbestos standard,
in the form of work practice standards, were not emission standards
within the meaning of Section 112 of the Clean Air Act as amended in
1970. Thus, certain work practice standards were deemed not
enforceable.
During the court case, the CAA was amended (August 7, 1977) to
authorize the use of "design, equipment, work practice and
operational standards." Some, but not all, of the work practice
standards were repromulgated on June 19, 1978. The recent
repromul gati on of the entire standard ensures that a11_ work practice
standards are now enforceable. The standard was also rearranged,
and parts of it reworded, for clarity.
ASBESTOS SOURCES
The following are sources of airborne asbestos fibers regulated to some
degree by the NESHAPs program.
12
-------
• Asbestos mills;
• Surfacing of roadways with asbestos-containing material;
• Manufacture of products using commercial asbestos;
• The demolition and/or renovation of buildings, structures,
installations that contain friable asbestos material;
• Restriction on the spraying of asbestos-containing materials;
• Fabrication of certain asbestos-containing products;
t Restriction on the use of insulating materials;
t Waste disposal at asbestos mills;
t Disposal of asbestos-containing waste generated during
manufacturing, demolition, renovation, spraying, and fabrication
operations;
• Closure of inactive waste disposal sites on plant property at mills,
manufacturing, and fabricating sources; and
• Active waste disposal sites.
13
-------
3. NATIONAL REGULATORY STRATEGY
The following material summarizes EPA's "Asbestos Demolition and
Renovation Enforcement Strategy" guidance from Headquarters to Regional
agencies. The complete strategy document is available from the EPA Regional
Offices.
OBJECTIVES
§ To provide effective and uniform enforcement of the Asbestos NESHAP
standard by Regions and the delegated states.
• To provide emphasis and assurance to Regions and states that EPA is
committed to a strong, high priority enforcement posture.
BACKGROUND
• An EPA Compliance Data System analysis shows that the number of
demolition/renovation sources is greater than the number of sources
in all other regulated categories combined, and compliance status
for demolition/renovation sources is much worse.
• The recent repromulgation of the entire asbestos NESHAP standard has
ensured that all work practice requirements for demolition/
renovation operations are now enforceable.
-------
STRATEGY
§ Train Regional and state personnel, using EPA's Regional Workshop,
to perform inspections of asbestos demolition and renovation sources.
• Publicize the asbestos NESHAP requirements by the following
mechani sms:
National and local press releases;
Letters to contractors advising them of the regulations;
Letters to potentially-affected sources advising them of the
regulations; and
Speaking engagements with trade and industry organizations, and
journal articles, presenting the status of regulations and
recommendations.
These policies will be facilitated by a clear line of communication
from Regions to states, to disseminate information from Headquarters.
• Inspect demolition and renovation sources to determine compliance,
including locating and inspecting non-notifiers. An inspection plan
may include all sources, all contractors, or any other program to
meet the Agency goal of 100 percent compliance. Grant agreements
currently negotiated with states should specify that inspections of
demolition and renovation sources are required.
15
-------
t Analyze bulk samples for asbestos using laboratories to be
identified by EPA, with future provisions for laboratories with a
rapid turnaround time in case of an emergency.
• Coordinate the NESHAPs program with EPA's TSCA program (Asbestos
In Schools), and the OSHA program for worker exposure. Coordination
of notifications is deemed most practical, but Regions are free to
institute any joint efforts which result in effective NESHAP
enforcement.
• Enforce NESHAPs provisions by legal mechanisms summarized below. In
cases where enforcement authority is delegated to states, Regions
are responsible for evaluating the adequacy of state action and
initiating appropriate Federal enforcement action.
Informal action:
A "Finding of Violation" may be issued to the source, and/or the
source may be invited to a "show cause" conference to determine
whether immediate compliance can be achieved without formal
enforcement proceedings. These actions may be appropriate if a
source has properly notified EPA and is making a good faith effort
to comply, but is failing in some respects.
16
-------
Administrative action:
1. A Section 113(a)(3) order can require immediate compliance, and
if violated sets the stage for liability to penalties under
Section 113(b) judicial action. This order may be appropriate if a
source indicates that an initial, insubstantial violation will not
be repeated.
2. A Section 303 order can require immediate compliance, and if
violated sets the stage for liability to penalties under a
Section 303 civil action. This order must be based on a finding of
"imminent and substantial endangerment" to the public health, and
EPA must confer with state and local authorities (even if the state
has no delegated authority) to confirm the basis for this order. A
Section 303 order may be appropriate in instances where a violation
is in question and a broader authority is needed to abate a health
hazard.
Judicial action:
1. A Section 113(b) civil action can require immediate compliance
while allowing EPA to seek civil penalties of up to $25,000 per day
of violation. This action would be appropriate in most cases where
immediate judicial relief is sought for substantial violations of
the asbestos NESHAP standard.
17
-------
2. A Section 113(c) criminal action can result in liability to
imprisonment of up to one year and/or penalties of up to $25,000 per
day of violation. This action would be appropriate if EPA has
evidence that a person knowingly violated the asbestos NESHAP.
Judicial action under Sections 113(b) or (c) may also be appropriate
if a source has completed or nearly completed its activities by the
time EPA is ready to take enforcement action. In this case,
judicial action may be an effective deterrent to future violations.
3. A Section 303 civil action can require immediate compliance based on
a finding of "imminent and substantial endangennent" to the public
health. As mentioned above, EPA must confirm the basis for
endangennent with state and local authorities. Penalties may not be
sought under this action unless the Agency has previously issued a
Section 303 administrative order which the source has violated, in
which case the source is liable to penalties of up to $5,000 per day
of violation.
(EPA's strategy document offers additional enforcement guidance,
including procedures to implement legal action and to assess civil
penalties.)
• Track and audit compliance programs. Audit procedures should
include joint Region-state inspections and semiannual reviews of
state inspection reports. Compliance tracking by Regions or states
18
-------
should include information on the number of notifications received,
number of projects inspected, number of violations, number of
notification violations, and the manner of resolution of the
violations. Guidelines for using CDS as a tracking mechanism are
contained in EPA's strategy document. SSCD is currently developing
a national register of contractors which have been cited for a
violation of asbestos provisions, and all states and Regions are
requested to submit data for this register.
• Accountability of Regions and states will be augmented by quarterly
reporting of performance indicators: total number of notifications,
total number of inspections, total number of violations, and
violation status.
19
-------
4. DEMOLITION AND RENOVATION REGULATIONS
The EPA regulations on NESHAPs are referenced as 40 CFR Part 61. During
the repromulgation, 40 CFR Part 61 has been amended by redesignating the
National Emission Standard for Asbestos - Subpart B (61.20 - 61.25) as
Subpart M (61.140 - 61.156). The following text is an overview of the
regulation, but should not be construed to amend or replace it in any way.
The complete regulation is contained in Appendix A.
The asbestos standard has not changed in substance. The repromulgation
is intended to reinstate certain work practices. The main thrust of the work
practices and the thrust of this workshop deals with asbestos as it pertains
to demolition and renovation activities.
DEFINITIONS
• Friable Asbestos Material (FAM)--Any material that contains more
than 1 percent asbestos by weight and that can be crumbled,
pulverized, or reduced to powder, when dry, by hand pressure.
• Demolition—The wrecking or taking out of any load-supporting
structural member of a facility together with any related handling
operations.
• Renovation--Altering in any way one or more facility components.
Operations in which load-supporting structural members are wrecked
or taken out are excluded.
20
-------
• Emergency Renovation--A renovation operation that was not planned,
but results from a sudden, unexpected event. This term includes
operations necessitated by nonroutine failures of equipment.
• Planned Renovation—A renovation operation, or a number of such
operations, in which the amount of friable asbestos material that
will be removed or stripped within a given period of time can be
predicted. Individual nonscheduled operations are included if a
number of such operations can be predicted to occur during a given
period of time based on operating experience.
• Facility--Any institutional, commercial, or industrial structure,
installation, or building (excluding apartment buildings with four
or less dwelling units).
• Facility Component—Any pipe, duct, boiler, tank, reactor, turbine,
or furnace at or in a facility; or any structural member of a
facility.
• Adequately Wetted—Sufficiently mixed or coated with water or an
aqueous solution to prevent dust emissions.
• Outside Air--The air outside buildings and structures.
21
-------
APPLICABILITY OF STANDARD
Quantity of Asbestos
• If the amount of materials containing more than 1 percent friable
asbestos that will be disturbed during renovation or demolition
operations is at least 80 linear meters on pipes or at least
15 square meters on other facility components, all notification
(61.146) and emission control procedures (61.147) apply.
t If the amount of materials containing more than 1 percent friable
asbestos that will be disturbed during demolition is less than the
previously stated quantity, only notification is required. This
notification allows the EPA to inspect the facility to assess the
quantity of asbestos.
• If the amount of materials containing more than 1 percent friable
asbestos that will be disturbed during renovation is less than the
previously stated quantity, the standard does not apply.
NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS
Notifying Responsibility
t Each owner or operator intending to demolish a facility must provide
the Administrator with a written notice.
22
-------
t
Each owner or operator intending to renovate a facility who is
subject to the standard must provide the Administrator with a
written notice.
Lead Time
• Postmarked 10 days before demolition activity begins if more than
80 linear meters or 15 square meters of friable asbestos will be
removed.
• Postmarked 20 days before demolition activity begins if less than
80 linear meters or 15 square meters of friable asbestos will be
removed.
• Postmarked as early as possible before renovation activity begins if
more than 80 linear meters or 15 square meters of friable asbestos
will be removed.
• The purpose of the additional notification lead time when less than
the prescribed amount of asbestos is reported for demolition is to
allow EPA time to inspect and determine agreement with the reported
quantity of friable asbestos.
• If a facility has been deemed as structurally unsound by a
governmental agency, notification of demolition shall be made as
early as possible.
23
-------
Contents of Notification
Whenever notification is required, the following minimum information
should be included:
• Name and address of owner or operator;
• Building description;
Size - square feet, number of floors;
Age - dates of original construction, and renovations;
Use - i.e., office, school, industrial, etc.
• Amount of friable asbestos, and for demolitions below the applicable
limits, an explanation of techniques used to determine the amount;
• Building location/address; and
• Work schedule, including the starting and completion dates.
If the facility is estimated by the owner or operator to have more than
80 linear meters or 15 square meters of friable asbestos material, the
following additional information should also be included in the notification:
• Demolition or renovation method(s) to be employed;
t Procedures for removal of friable asbestos;
24
-------
• Name and location of disposal site where friable asbestos waste
material will be deposited; and
• Name, title, and authority of governmental representative ordering
demolition of a facility deemed structurally unsound.
PROCEDURES FOR ASBESTOS EMISSION CONTROL
Removal of Friable Asbestos Material
• Each owner or operator of a facility containing more than the
previously stated quantity of FAM shall prevent emissions of
particulate asbestos material to the outside air by removing all FAM
from the facility, which would potentially be disturbed during the
renovation or demolition activities.
• Materials containing friable asbestos may be stripped in place and
properly disposed or removed from the facility in large sections for
stripping and proper disposal at a separate location.
• If the facility is being demolished under an order of a governmental
agency because it is structurally unsound and in danger of imminent
collapse, there is no requirement to remove the friable asbestos,
but the portion of the facility that contains the material must be
adequately wetted during demolition (except under freezing
conditions).
25
-------
• Friable asbestos encased in concrete is not required to be removed
prior to demolition, but must be wetted whenever exposed during
demolition (except under freezing conditions).
Wetting and Handling Friable Asbestos Materials
• During cutting, disjoining or stripping operations, the owner or
operator shall adequately wet any exposed friable asbestos.
• Stripped wetted friable material shall be carefully lowered to the
ground or a lower floor, not dropped or thrown.
• For transport of stripped FAM (except units removed as sections)
more than 50 feet above ground, dust-tight chutes or containers must
be employed.
• Units or sections containing friable asbestos i.iust be carefully
moved to ground level, not dropped or thrown.
t If a facility component has been removed from a structurally unsound
building for stripping, the asbestos material must be adequately
wetted or exhausted to a local exhaust ventilation and collection
system (with no visible emissions) and properly disposed.
• Friable asbestos materials that have been removed must remain wet
until they are collected for disposal.
26
-------
• Wetting may be accomplished in many ways; such as hand-held pump
tanks, faucet tap, or water barrel with a pump, hose and nozzle.
• Surfactants, although not required, are commonly added to water to
aid penetration and wetting of asbestos fibers. Use of a surfactant
also reduces the amount of water required for wetting. Current EPA
guidance recommends using 50 percent polyoxyethylene ester and
50 percent polyoxyethylene ether, or the equivalent, in a
0.16 percent solution (1 oz per 5 gallons) of water
(EPA-450/2-78-014).
• If the temperature at the point of a friable asbestos removal
activity is below freezing (0°C), the owner or operator need not wet
FAM during removal, but should try to remove the materials as units
to a location where they can be stripped while being wetted or
evacuated to a dust collection system.
Local Exhaust Ventilation (LEV)
• In renovation operations where the Administrator agrees that wetting
would cause damage to equipment, the owner or operator shall use a
local exhaust ventilation and collection system.
• Also, if facility components have been taken out of the facility for
stripping friable asbestos material, the owner or operator may
choose to use a local exhaust ventilation and collection system
rather than follow the wetting requirements above.
27
-------
• If a collection system is employed, it must exhibit no visible
emissions to the outside air or be operated within the air cleaning
requirements listed below.
AIR CLEANING CONTROL DEVICES
• Under the condition previously described, an owner or operator may
choose to control friable asbestos emissions during demolition or
renovation operations by an air-cleaning device.
• The recommended air-cleaning device is a fabric filter. The most
common fabric filter used is a baghouse. Other filters, not
specifically recommended for use, include high efficiency
particulate air filters (HEPA) and furnace exhaust filters.
• However, if the use of fabric filters creates a fire or explosion
hazard, the owner or operator, with approval from the regulatory
agency, may use a wet collector designed to operate with a unit
contacting energy (pressure drop) of at least 40 inches water gauge.
• Or, the owner or operator may, with Agency approval, use another
control device that is equivalent to either of the above in
filtering particulate asbestos material.
28
-------
FABRIC FILTER OPERATING CONDITIONS
- PRESSURE DROP: i4 INCHES WATER GAGE
- AIR FLOW PERMEABILITY:
WOVEN FABRIC - 30 FT^/MIN/FT2
FELTED FABRIC - 35 FT3/MIN/FT2
- BAG WEIGHT: FOR FELTED FABRIC, AT LEAST
14 OZ/YD2
- BAG THICKNESS: FOR FELTED FABRIC, AT LEAST
1/16 INCH
- FILL YARN IN SYNTHETIC FABRICS SHOULD BE SPUN
• If the owner or operator elects to comply with the air-cleaning
provisions rather than the no-VE standard, he must operate the unit
according to these parameters. These conditions were established by
EPA based on design criteria and not necessarily operating
experience.
• The fabric filter must be operated such that the pressure drop
across the filter is less than or equal to 4 inches water gauge.
This pressure loss of 4 inches is based on a design criteria
established to prevent the installation of an undersized unit,
whereby the air-to-cloth ratio is so high that it places a heavy
burden on the collecting fabric, thus possibly shortening its
service life or causing frequent failures due to excessive pressure
buildup on the fabric surface.
§ In addition to these operating conditions the asbestos standard
requires that all air-cleaning devices must be properly installed,
operated, and maintained.
29
-------
• Bypass devices may be used only during upset or emergency
conditions, and then only for so long as it takes to shut down the
operation generating the particulate asbestos material.
• Important Note; If a source cannot meet the air-cleaning
requirements when it has elected to do so, it defaults to the
no visible emission standard.
WASTE DISPOSAL
Asbestos-Containing Wastes
• As identified by the standard, demolition and renovation asbestos-
containing wastes include:
Friable asbestos waste; and
Control device asbestos waste, including slurries.
• Inspectors should be aware of the dust potential for other asbestos-
containing wastes, such as:
Plastic sheeting used to seal room;
Personal protection equipment; and
Cleanup equipment waste.
Cl
30
-------
Waste Handling Methods
• The owner or operator responsible for generating asbestos-containing
waste material shall discharge rw visible emissions to the outside
air during collection, processing, packaging, transporting, or
deposition of the material.
• As an alternative to the no visible emission requirement, one of the
following disposal methods may be used:
Treatment with water. Must meet visible emission standard or
air cleaning provision during collection, mixing, and wetting
operations. After wetting, all asbestos-containing waste must
be sealed in leak-tight containers while wet, and labeled;
Processing into nonfriable forms (such as pellets or other
shapes). Must meet visible emission standard or air cleaning
provision during collection and processing operations;
Alternate method. Requires approval of the Administrator prior
to implementation.
Haste Disposal Site Provisions
• It is the responsibility of the generator, not the site operator, to
assure that the asbestos wastes are disposed of in compliance with
regulations.
31
-------
To be an acceptable site for disposal of asbestos-containing waste
material, an active disposal site must meet one of the following
criteria:
ACTIVE WASTE DISPOSAL SITE PROVISION
VISIBLE EMISSION
•AND'
OR
WARNING SIGNS
AND FENCING
OR
NATURAL BARRIER THAT
DETERS PUBLIC ACCESS
SIX INCH COVER OF COMPACTED
NONASBESTOS-CONTAINING MATERIAL
WITHIN 24-HOUR PERIOD
QR
COVER WITH A RESINOUS
OR PETROLEUM-BASED DUST
SUPPRESSION AGENT WITHIN
24-HOUR PERIOD
OR
ALTERNATIVE CONTROL METHOD
RECEIVING PRIOR APPROVAL
-AND-
-AND-
WARNING SIGNS
AND FENCING
OR
NATURAL BARRIER THAT
DETERS PUBLIC ACCESS
WARNING SIGNS
AND FENCING
QR
NATURAL BARRIER THAT
DETERS PUBLIC ACCESS
-------
DEMOLITION REQUIREMENTS
NO
FURTHER
ACTION
i61.147(b),(c) REQUIRE
rfETTING/HANDLING DURING
REMOVAL INSIDE
161.IWd) REQUIRES
WETTING OR LEV DURING
STRIPPING OUTSIDE
-------
RENOVATION REQUIREMENTS
561.146 REQUIRES
NOTIFICATION
§ 61.147(0 TRY TO
REMOVE IN SECTIONS
§61.147(6) REQUIRES
WETTING/HANDLING
JURING SECTION CUTTING
6l.lA7(c) REQUIRES
LEV DURING STRIPPING
IN PLACE
5 61.11(7 (c) REQUIRES
WETTING DURING
STRIPPING IN PLACE
§61.l47(d) REQUIRES
WETTING OR LEV DURING
STRIPPING OUTSIDE
§6l.1lt7(e) REQUIRES
WETTING/HANDLING
STRIPPED FAM
§ 61.152 WASTE
DISPOSAL REQUIREMENTS
34
-------
FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS - POSSIBLE REVISIONS
Issues that are currently under consideration for incorporation into
future amendments to the asbestos standards are as follows:
• Add new source categories.
Encapsulation process of spray-applied or trowelled-on FAM in
buildings.
Offsite waste disposal sites - to regulate these sources
directly, i.e., to place responsibility for emission control on
the waste disposal site operator.
t Tighten waste handling and disposal procedures.
Require a thicker depth of cover material.
Require more specific waste containerization.
Require recordkeeping of waste disposal.
• Expand demolition and renovation notification requirements to
include a telephone call, thereby eliminating delays with mail
system.
t Strengthen demolition and renovation control measures.
Require more stringent air emission controls at site.
Add a cleanup requirement provision for renovation projects
that assures a certain asbestos air concentration is met at the
job completion.
35
-------
• Adopt a reference test method for analysis of asbestos content in
bulk samples.
• Include notification in a property deed which would cover landfills
where asbestos waste is buried and buildings where FAM was
encapsulated or enclosed and thus remains in the building.
• Disposal may be regulated under RCRA.
Note that these issues are only under consideration. Any repromulgation
that would include these or other items might not occur for two to three years
from now. Comments or questions regarding future revisions should be
addressed to John Copeland at 919/541-5595 or FTS 629-5595.
36
-------
5. ASBESTOS IN SCHOOLS
BACKGROUND
EPA's Office of Pesticides and Toxic Substances (OPTS) issued this rule
to reduce the health risk from exposure to asbestos-containing materials in
school buildings (listed under 40 CFR Part 763, Subpart F). The rule applies
to public and private elementary and secondary (grade 12 and under) schools.
The rule requires local education agencies to identify friable asbestos-
containing material (FAM) by inspection and sampling, notify employees and
parent-teacher associations of the inspection results, and maintain records of
the inspection results. The rule exempts schools built after December 31,
1978 and schools in which FAM has been adequately removed, enclosed, or
encapsulated.
The Asbestos In Schools rule does not contain abatement provisions
whereby corrective action is required to remove FAM or eliminate the exposure
risk. This has been a major criticism of the rule. EPA is currently in an
advisory role and has allowed the localities to determine abatement
strategies. However, EPA has supplied guidance and is continuing to develop
and publish data regarding abatement techniques (see FR Vol. 49, No. 46,
March 7, 1984).
37
-------
REQUIREMENTS
§763.105 Inspection for friable material.
• All areas must be inspected, including behind suspended ceilings or
other nonpermanent structures which may be entered for routine
maintenance;
• Friable materials must be located by touching; nonfriable materials
are not to be disturbed; and
• Inspection procedures are given in "Asbestos-Containing Materials in
School Buildings: A Guidance Document" (EPA No. C00090).
§763.107 Sampling friable material.
t Friable materials shall be classified as distinct sampling areas and
at least 3 samples are to be taken from each area at random
locations according to procedures in EPA-560/13-80-017.
§763.109 Analyzing friable material.
t Samples are analyzed for asbestos using Polarized Light Microscopy
(PLM), supplemented where necessary by X-ray Diffraction (see method
contained in Appendix A to 40 CFR Part 763 Subpart F);
38
-------
• List of qualified laboratories, updated semiannually, is available
from RTI (1-800-334-8571); and
• Use of electron microscopy for sample analysis is not allowed after
Oune 28, 1982.
§763.111 Warnings and Notifications wnere asbestos is present.
t Notice to School Employees {EPA Form 7730-3) shall be posted in
certain areas and remain posted indefinitely in any school
containing FAM;
• A written notice of the location of all FAM shall be supplied to
each building employee;
• A copy of the "Guide for Reducing Asbestos Exposure" (EPA Form
7730-2) shall be distributed to all custodial or maintenance
employees; and
• Parents of school children shall be notified directly, or through
Parent-Teacher Associations (PTA), of the inspection results.
39
-------
§763.114 Recordkeeping. The following records are to be made publicly
available on request:
• A record in each school of the inspection program, including for
schools which contain FAM:
location of each sampling area, and estimate of asbestos
content;
location of each sample within an area, and the I.D. number;
copies of all laboratory reports and correspondence with
laboratories concerning analyses;
• For schools which contain FAM, copies in each school of the "Guide
for Reducing Asbestos Exposure", EPA Guidance Document No. C00090,
and the Notice to School Employees;
• At each school a statement that the requirements of the rule have
been satisfied, signed and dated by the person responsible for
compliance;
• At each local education agency a list of schools under their
authority and the inspection status of each; and for schools which
contain FAM, the total area of such material and the number of
employees who regularly work in the school; and
• At each local education agency a completed inspection record (EPA
Form 7730-1).
40
-------
§763.117 Exemptions. The following are exempt from all provisions of the
Asbestos In Schools rule:
• Schools built after December 31, 1978;
• Schools in which all FAM has been eliminated by removal, or has been
isolated by air-tight enclosure with restricted access;
• Schools in which all FAM has been eliminated by satisfactory
encapsulation;
• Schools which were inspected, sampled, and analyzed prior to the
effective date of this rule in accordance with all provisions of
this rule, and which were found to contain no FAM; provided that the
school maintains on record copies of all laboratory reports and a
certifying statement that no FAM is present; and
• Schools which can document that no FAM was used in building
construction, modification, and renovation; provided that the school
maintains on record a certifying statement that no FAM is present.
The following are exempt from the Inspection (§763.105), Sampling
(§763.107), and Analysis (§763.109) requirements:
• Schools which were inspected, sampled, and analyzed prior to the
effective date of this rule in accordance with all of the provisions
of this rule (and in which FAM was found); and
41
-------
• Schools which certify that all friable materials shall be treated as
asbestos-containing, and which specify the location of such material.
ABATEMENT TECHNIQUES
EPA has not promulgated mandatory abatement requirements due to certain
technical obstacles (see 49 FR 8450). However, EPA has developed guidance for
abatement decisions that is summarized in "Guidance for Controlling Friable
Asbestos-Containing Materials in Buildings," EPA-560/5-83-002, March 1983.
There are four general control measures to reduce asbestos exposure risk:
• removal;
• enclosure;
• encapsulation; and
• maintenance and reassessment program.
Further guidance regarding control measures is available from Regional
Asbestos Coordinators (RACs) and Technical Advisors (TAs).
Removal consists of debonding the FAM and discarding it.
• Applicable to all situations.
§ Advantages:
eliminates asbestos permanently.
42
-------
• Disadvantages:
replacement with substitute material may be necessary;
porous surfaces may also require encapsulation to control
residual material; and
requires compliance with OSHA and NESHAP regulations to prevent
an increase in fiber levels.
Enclosure consists of constructing an air-tight barrier between the FAM
(left intact) and the building occupants.
t Applicable when:
disturbance or entry into the enclosed area appears to be
unlikely; and
FAM is undamaged and current fiber release rate appears to be
low.
• Advantages:
controls current fiber release; and
typically has a lower capital cost than removal.
t Disadvantages:
must maintain enclosure and control access;
enclosure construction may increase fiber levels; and
long-term costs could be higher than for removal.
43
-------
Encapsulation consists of applying a penetrating or bridging sealant to
the FAM (left intact) to render it nonfriable.
t Applicable when:
FAM retains bonding integrity to substrate and is undamaged;
FAM is not highly accessible; and
FAM is granular or cementitous rather than fibrous or fluffy.
• Advantages:
reduces current fiber release;
typically has a lower capital cost than removal.
• Disadvantages:
must maintain sealant integrity and control access;
sealant may cause FAM to delaminate;
encapsulated material is more difficult to remove and may
require dry techniques for eventual removal; and
long-term costs could be higher than for removal.
• Guidelines for sealant use:
Battelle has evaluated sealants for EPA based on impact
resistance, flame spread, smoke generation, toxic gas
generation during combustion, and adhesive/cohesive strength.
Thirty-four commercially available products were determined as
acceptable by Battelle, based on laboratory tests with a
mineral wool matrix (see attached list). Note that EPA has not
endorsed any of the products on this list.
44
-------
A selected sealant should be tested for several days prior to
widespread use, to determine if del ami nation or deterioration
is a concern;
Coverage should be greater than one gallon/100 sq. ft.;
Sealant should be applied with airless spray equipment, using a
light coat followed by a full coat at a 90 degree angle; and
Sealant should not be applied to FAM thicker than 1.25 inches
due to the del ami nation hazard.
Maintenance and Reassessment consists of special housekeeping procedures,
maintenance precautions, and inspection procedures to minimize the
exposure risk.
• Applicable when:
a temporary control measure is needed until a more permanent
solution is implemented; and
FAM is in good condition and the potential for disturbance
appears to be low.
• Advantages:
least expensive control measure.
• Disadvantages:
must control access to FAM and periodically reassess condition;
no reduction in current fiber release rate.
45
-------
Selection of a Control Measure
The following parameters must be considered:
• Size of the material application and how this affects the overall
job price;
• Accessability;
• Condition of the material, whether deteriorating or stable;
• Type of substrate, which influences:
the potential for del ami nation with an encapsulant; and
if porous, the need for an encapsulant after removal operations;
• Thickness of the material, since encapsulants are only recommended
for FAM less than 1.25 inches thick; and
t Building use and future conditions which might affect fiber release.
Summary
• Removal has the widest applicability of all control alternatives.
It is also the only true permanent solution, since no building
containing asbestos can be demolished without first removing the
material (>80 linear meters or 15 square meters). It is the only
46
-------
control measure which can guarantee elimination of asbestos
exposure. Although the initial cost may be higher than for other
control methods, the long-term cost is probably lower.
• Enclosure and encapsulation must be followed with a special
operations program and with periodic reinspection of the enclosed or
encapsulated materials.
• Removal, enclosure, and encapsulation should be undertaken only
after construction of sealed containment barriers.
• Proper worker protection is mandated by OSHA for removal operations,
and is needed for enclosure and encapsulation activities as well.
FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS
The Asbestos In Schools rule may be expanded in the future to address
abatement requirements. The agency is currently considering the following
actions to support and improve the rule:
• Establishing a clearinghouse to facilitate the exchange of technical
information regarding asbestos abatement;
• Establishing a nationwide training program for States, contractors,
parents, maintenance and abatement workers, teachers, and others;
47
-------
• Requiring certification of asbestos abatement contractors;
• Requiring periodic reinspections of schools that decided not to
remove FAM; and
t Requiring asbestos abatement, and establishing standards for
abatement activities and the protection of abatement workers. For
example, studies have shown a substantial fiber release during
encapsulation, up to 100 times the OSHA standard of 2 f/cc.
• Banning asbestos in certain products and phasing down use of
asbestos products over a 10-year period.
EPA is conducting a two-year compliance monitoring program to address
current violations of the rule. Resources allocated for inspections and case
development have been increased. The agency is conducting a national survey
over the next few months to estimate overall compliance and assess the extent
of abatement actions.
-------
SEALANTS RECOMMENDED AS ACCEPTABLE BY BATTELLE
Product
L241-43, Parts A and B
Metro-shield
Mono-therm F-100
Penqua 200
Product No. 1583,
32-20 and 32-21
Pyrokote-MX
Aqua! old 15-10
Chemex Ultra Seal
C-1019
Dust-Set
FRC-REPC
FRC-AES
Hygienscote
No. 207 Special Sealer
25-2355
622-538
95-C-104
95-W-100
Super Chemseal
Thermatek
TCI-750
Ultra Lok 40-871
Water-based Polyester
Water-based XD-DG
Manufacturer
Carboline Co., St. Louis, MO
Bertelson Associates, Inc., Tinton Falls, NJ
Mono-therm Industries Inc., Kirkland, WA
United Coatings, Spokane, WA
H.B. Fuller Co., Springhouse, PA
Development Services Int'l., Washington, D.C.
Essex Chemical Corp., Jamestown, NY
Chemex Chemical & Coating Co., Tampa, FL
California Products Corp., Cambridge, MA
Mateson Chemical Corp., Philadelphia, PA
FRC Composites Ltd., Don Mills, Ontario
Acalor Chemical Construction, Weston, Ontario
Makus Development Corp., Mercer Island, WA
National Starch & Chemical Corp., Grand Prairie, TX
Findley Adhesives Inc., Elm Grove, WI
M.A. Bruder & Sons Inc., Broomall, PA
Chemray Coatings Corp., Middlesex, NJ
Protek Manufacturing, Milwaukee, WI
Therma-Coustics, Col ton, CA
Cell in Manufacturing Inc., Springfield, VA
Dow Chemical Co., Midland, MI
49
-------
SEALANTS RECOMMENDED AS ACCEPTABLE BY BATTELLE (Continued)
Product
Asbestite 2000
Asbestop BW225
Cable Coating 2-B
Cafco-Bond-Seal
Decadex Firecheck
EX-64-2
Ocean 566
HI-6625-583-9
SK-13 Emulsion
Manufacturer
Arpin Products Inc., Oakhurst, NJ
McGeddy Int'l. Inc., W. Long Beach, NJ
American Coatings Corp., Chicago, IL
U.S. Mineral Products Co., Stanhope, NJ
Pentagon Plastics Ltd., W. Palm Beach, FL
Lehman Bros. Corp., Jersey City, NJ
Flame-Crete Co. of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario
Habersham Industries Inc., Smyrna, GA
National Cellulose Corp., Houston, TX
50
-------
5. OSHA ASBESTOS PROGRAM
BACKGROUND
t The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) develops
and enforces regulations to protect the health of workers, rather
than the general population. OSHA standards and requirements apply
to the workplace, but not to the ambient atmosphere outside a
workplace.
• OSHA is advised on technical matters by the National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH).
t OSHA is a member, with EPA and the Consumer Product Safety
Commission, of the Federal Asbestos Task Force established in June
1983. This group was assembled to develop a unified Federal
approach for the regulation of asbestos.
• EPA and OSHA have been mandated to coordinate on asbestos regulation
where possible. Each EPA Region should have a system for referring
potential violators to OSHA personnel for investigation.
REGULATORY HISTORY
t OSHA adopted a 12 f/cc limit on May 29, 1971 in the initial
promulgation of OSHA standards.
51
-------
• OSHA issued an ETS on December 7, 1971 lowering the permissible
exposure limits to 5 f/cc on an 8-hour time-weighted average (TWA)
basis and 10 f/cc for a peak exposure.
• OSHA promulgated the current standard in June 1972, which includes
permissible exposures of:
5 f/cc on an 8-hour TWA, effective July 7, 1972;
2 f/cc on an 8-hour TWA, effective July 1, 1976;
10 f/cc ceiling limit.
This standard was based on the determination that it would prevent
asbestosis, and reduce the risk of cancer to an undefined extent.
The standard includes requirements for compliance methods,
monitoring, medical surveillance, and housekeeping.
• In 1975, OSHA proposed to reduce exposure limits to 0.5 f/cc on an
8-hour TWA basis and 5 f/cc ceiling limit. The proposed rulemaking
was based on accumulated evidence that asbestos is a human
carcinogen. The proposed rule excluded the construction industry,
but OSHA announced its intention to propose a separate rule for this
source category. However, no such proposal was made, and no hearing
was scheduled on the proposed standard revision.
t NIOSH recommended to OSHA on December 15, 1976 that the standard be
lowered to "the lowest level detectable by available analytical
techniques," 0.1 f/cc.
52
-------
• OSHA issued an ETS on November 4, 1983 lowering the TWA exposure
limit to 0.5 f/cc for all industries, and including revisions for
worker training, respiratory protection, and warning signs. This
ETS was based on "information and analyses which postdate the 1975
proposal" regarding the cancer risk. The ETS was held invalid by
the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on March 7, 1984 in an action
brought by the Asbestos Information Association (AIA).
• OSHA proposed a rule on April 10, 1984 similar to the previous ETS,
except that the reduced exposure limit was specified as 0.2 f/cc o£
0.5 f/cc on an 8-hour TWA basis, and additional employee training
requirements were proposed. This proposal replaces the 1975
proposal, and applies to all workplaces including construction (or
demolition/renovation) activities.
OSHA ASBESTOS STANDARD
29 CFR 1910.1001 Asbestos
29 CFR 1910.20 Access to employee exposure and medical records
29 CFR 1910.134 Respiratory protection
29 CFR 1910.141 Sanitation
53
-------
Definition
t The definition of "asbestos fioer" is a mineral fiber longer than
5 micrometers which consists of chrysotile, amosite, crocidolite,
tremolite, anthophyllite, or actinolite asbestos.
Permissible Exposure Levels
• 2 f/cc for an 8-hour TWA concentration.
• 10 f/cc for a ceiling concentration (15-minute sample).
Compliance Methods
• Engineering methods shall De used to meet the exposure limits, such
as isolation, enclosure, exhaust ventilation, and dust collection.
• Work practices, such as wet methods (where applicable) and use of
protective equipment for demolition/renovation workers, are also
required. Demolition/renovation workers shall be provided with type
"C" respirators (see below) and special protective clothing.
54
-------
Protective Equipment
• Compliance with exposure limits shall not be achieved by use of
respirators or shift rotations, except:
During the installation of engineering controls or work
practices;
In situations where engineering controls and work practices are
infeasible or insufficient; and
In emergency situations.
• Where respirators are used, they shall be approved by the Bureau of
Mines or NIOSH, and the type shall be selected as follows:
Air purifying respirators are to be used when asbestos
concentrations are expected to be no more than 10 times the
ceiling or TWA exposure limits.
Powered air purifying respirators are to be used when asbestos
concentrations are expected to be no more than 100 times, but
at least 10 times the ceiling or TWA exposure limits.
Supplied-air (type "C") respirators are to be used when
asbestos concentrations are expected to be more than 100 times
the ceiling or TWA exposure limits.
• Special protective clothing shall be used by any employee exposed to
asbestos concentrations above the permissible ceiling limit.
55
-------
• Change rooms shall be provided at "fixed" workplaces to employees
exposed to asbestos concentrations above the ceiling or TWA limits.
Facilities shall include clothes lockers, and contaminated clothing
shall be handled in sealed containers. Laundering shall be done so
as to prevent exceedances of the permissible exposure limits.
Measurement
• Determinations of airborne concentrations shall be made using the
membrane filter method at 400 to 450 magnification (4 mm objective)
with phase contrast illumination.
Monitoring
t Samples shall be collected from within the breathing zones of
employees, and in areas representative of such breathing zones, on
membrane filters of 0.8 ym porosity in an open-face filter holder.
• Sampling required at intervals no greater than six months for
employees whose exposure to asbestos is expected to exceed the
exposure limits.
• Affected employees shall have the opportunity to observe such
monitoring and shall have access to the records thereof.
56
-------
Caution Signs and Labels
• Caution signs shall be posted at all locations where exposure limits
may be exceeded, such that employees can read the signs before
entering the marked location.
t Caution labels shall be affixed to all raw materials, mixtures,
scrap, waste, debris, and other products containing unbonded
asbestos fibers which are expected to release fibers exceeding the
exposure limits.
Housekeeping
• Surfaces shall be kept clean of asbestos fibers if their dispersion
would result in an exposure limit exceedance.
• Asbestos-containing wastes, equipment, or clothing shall be disposed
of in sealed containers if disposal would result in an exposure
limit exceedance.
Recordkeeping
• Records of personal and environmental monitoring shall be maintained
for at least 30 years, and shall be available upon request to
employees and OSHA personnel.
57
-------
• Any employee found to be subject to an exposure exceedance shall be
notified in writing within 5 days of the finding, and shall be
notified in a timely fashion of the corrective action taken.
Medical Exami nati ons
• Medical examinations are required at the start of employment and at
least annually thereafter, including 30 days before or after
termination of employment.
t Medical examinations shall include at least a chest x-ray, a medical
history, and pulmonary function tests.
• Records of medical examinations shall be retained for at least
30 years, and shall be provided upon request to employees and OSHA
personnel.
FUTURE REVISIONS CONCERNING THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY
OSHA is considering a separate asbestos standard for the construction
industry, considering the transient nature of construction employment and
changing conditions of exposure. OSHA raised the following issues in the
current proposed rule:
• Should permissible exposure limits be the same as for other
industries? The current proposed rule would not differentiate
between the construction industry and other workplaces.
58
-------
• How should monitoring be conducted? Monitoring a nonfixed workplace
such as a demolition/renovation site may require fast laboratory
analysis, increased sampling frequency, or use of test results from
previous monitoring programs.
• Should exposure limits be attained by work practices only, without
use of respirators? The current proposed rule would continue to
require work practices to achieve a level of 2 f/cc, but would allow
use of respirators to reduce exposure from 2 f/cc to the proposed
limit (0.5 f/cc or 0.2 f/cc).
t Should respirators continue to be selected based on the degree of
exceeding permissible exposure limits? If so, the proposed rule
would require use of powered or full facepiece air purifying
respirators at levels of 2 to 20 f/cc or 5 to 50 f/cc. OSHA has
estimated that average exposures in the renovation and demolition
industry are 20 f/cc without respirators.
• Should additional protective equipment be required for workers? The
current standard specifies equipment for employees exposed to
asbestos in excess of the ceiling limit.
• Should change rooms and clothes lockers also be required for
nonfixed (construction) workplaces? Should additional hygiene
facilities such as showers or lunch rooms be provided? The current
standard does not include such requirements except for "fixed"
workplaces.
59
-------
• Should the requirement for medical examinations be revised for the
construction industry? Expected problems with this program include
tracking records for relatively transient employees, and use of
medical tests to discriminate against less hardy job applicants.
• Should any recordkeeping requirements apply to the construction
industry? Again, this relates to the temporary employment situation
which is reportedly specific to the construction industry. Also,
such records may not be useful in an epidemiology study since these
workers are subject to continually changing exposure.
• Should additional regulatory provisions be instituted for the
construction industry? OSHA is currently considering at least two
provisions:
To exempt employers from certain duties based on use of
classified new products, which have been shown not to result in
exceedances of exposure limits (this provision would apply to
installation operations, but not to demolition/renovation
activities); and
To require employer reporting to OSHA prior to each job, and
employee competency certification prior to performing asbestos
work.
60
-------
7. SAFETY EQUIPMENT
BACKGROUND
EPA has no specific requirements for safety equipment for their
inspectors. The following safety equipment is suggested for inspectors,
based on OSHA requirements for demolition/renovation workers. Note that
demolition/renovation contractors may have additional safety requirements for
eacn worksite, and may request the EPA inspector to comply with these
requirements.
PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT
• Respirator--OSHA requires one of three respirator groups to be used
depending on the expected exposure level to asbestos fibers. Any
respirator used should be approved by NIOSH or the Mine Safety
Health Administration (MSHA), carrying a written statement of
approval on the product data sheet or brochure. It is recommended
that a respirator does not bond to the hood of a suit. The three
general respirator groups and tiieir recommended use are as follows:
1. A reuseable or single use air purifying respirator when
airuorne asoestos concentrations are between Ix and lOx the
OSHA celling or TWA standard. These are the levels most
frequently encountered at demolition and renovation worksites,
61
-------
according to OSHA. Mote that cartridge approval for asbestos is
typically recorded on the cartridge itself, or at least on the
cartridge or mask snipping carton.
2. A powered air purifying respirator (belt mounted fan) with
approved filter when airborne asbestos concentrations are
between lOx and lUOx the OSHA ceiling or TWA standard.
»}. A continuous flow or pressure-demand, supplied-air respirator
when asbestos concentrations are greater than lOOx the OSHA
ceiling or TWA standard. These levels may occur during active
demolition or renovation operations.
t Safety Shoes--Safety-toe footwear must meet ANSI standard Z41.1-1967
requirements.
• Safety G1asses--Protective eyewear must meet ANSI standard
Z87.1-1979 requirements.
• Hard Hat--Helmets must meet ANSI standard Z89.1-1981 requirements.
• Disposable Gloves—PVC gloves are recommended by EPA if any handling
of asbestos material is anticipated.
62
-------
t Disposable Suits—Recommended by EPA if any active demolition or
renovation operations are anticipated. Some type of protective
clothing is required by OSHA if ceiling limits are exceeded. EPA
recommends disposables made of DuPont Tyvek®or an equivalent
protective material. The suit should include hooded coveralls with
attached boot covers.
Equipment Suppliers
The following suppliers of safety equipment were listed in the
Tnomas Register 1984.
Ari zona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Fl ori da
Illinois
Louisiana
Direct Safety Company (complete line of equipment)
Phoenix: 800-528-7405/602-968-7009
Racher Distribution Company (complete line of equipment)
Menlo Park: 415-327-9249
E.D. Bullard Company (headgear, supplied-air
respirators)
Sausalito: 415-332-0410
Thompson Respiration Products, Inc. (respirators)
Boulder: 303-443-3350
M. Setlow & Son, Inc. (clothing)
Orange: 203-799-2315
Amfac Safety, Inc. (complete line of equipment)
Miami: 3J5-446-5766
Latex Glove Co., Inc. (headgear, eyewear, respirators)
Northbrook: 800-^23-8393/312-291-1600
Sellstrom Manufacturing Co. (headgear, eyewear,
respirators)
Palatine: 312-358-2000
Safety Supply House (complete line of equipment)
Belle Chasse: 504-394-7780
63
-------
Maryland
Michigan
Missouri
New Jersey
New York
Ohio
Pennsylvania --
Rhode Island
Wisconsin
Racal Airstream, Inc. (respirators)
Fredrick: 301-695-8200
HSC Corporation (eyewear, respirators)
Buchanan: 616-695-9663
U.S. Safety Service Co. (eyewear, headgear, respirators)
Kansas City: 816-842-8500
Belmar Safety Equipment, Inc. (complete line of
equipment)
Barri ngton: 800-257-7744/609-547-8344
New Jersey Safety Equipment Co. (headgear, eyewear,
respirators)
Union: 201-687-5292
Eastco Industrial Safety Corp. (complete line of
equipment)
Flushi ng: 800-221-0224/212-762-2600
Scott Aviation (respirators)
Lancaster: 716-683-5100
Eastern Safety Equipment Co. (complete line of
equipment)
Long Island City: 212-392-4100
Glendale Optical Co., Inc. (headgear, eyewear,
respirators)
Woodbury: 516-921-5800
Gateway Safety Products Co. (headgear, eyewear,
respirators)
Cleveland: 215-749-1100
Pro-tech Apparel (complete line of equipment)
Glenolden: 215-522-0400
Mine Safety Appliances Co. (complete line of equipment)
Pittsburgh: 412-273-5000
Siebe Norton, Inc. (complete line of equipment)
Cranston: 401-943-4400
Lab Safety Supply Co. (eyewear, clothing, respirators)
Janesville: 800-356-0783/608-754-2345
64
-------
EQUIPMENT USE
Pre-entry
• Initial respirator fit test should be performed at least
qualitatively using saccharin nebulizer, or irritant smoke.
• Field check the respirator for proper fit by positive pressure
method, after adjusting straps for a comfortaole and close fit.
Check exhalation valve seal by negative pressure method.
• Don shoes, respirator, and gloves before coveralls or whole body
suits. A hardhat is worn over the coverall hood.
• Tape arm cuffs of coveralls to seal tightly against gloves, leaving
taos for easy removal. If ruboer booties are worn, tape tightly to
legs of coveralls.
Decontamination
• Remove gross fiDer contamination from clothing before leaving the
work area.
t Remove clothing and gloves by pulling inside out to trap external
dust. Dispose of used clothing in plastic bags.
65
-------
• A complete shower is recommended, including rinsing the respirator
exterior before removal. Discard wetted filters in plastic bags.
• Rinse or wet-wipe hardhat and shoes
• Dry gear and body with disposable towels. Discard all wipes and
towels in plastic bags.
• Clean rubber or plastic respirator facepiece with soap or mild
detergent, and disinfectant.
SAFETY PRECAUTIONS
To minimize the exposure to airborne asbestos fibers, the following steps
should be considered;
• Access site as little as is necessary to determine compliance.
• Follow site operator recommendations regarding clean room practice
and changing areas on entry.
• Conduct sampling with minimum personnel present, during a period of
inactivity, and after the HVAC system has been shut off.
-------
t Do not disturb suspect materials any more than is necessary for
sampling or to determine if friable.
t Follow site operator recommendations regarding clean room practice
and changing rooms on exit.
To minimize the risk of physical injury the following precautions are
suggested:
• Check with site operator prior to entry on condition of structure
and extent of demolition or deterioration.
t ChecK on location of firefighting equipment, emergency showers,
eyewash stations, and escape routes near work area.
• Check with site foreman on specific hazards in the work area.
• Minimize disassembly and handling structural materials to the extent
necessary for sampling or inspection for friable asbestos material.
67
-------
8. ASBESTOS NESHAP INSPECTIONS LEGAL PERSPECTIVES
The following legal guidelines advise inspectors on who is subject to the
asbestos NESHAP, the authority for inspections, the enforcement options for
violators, and the legal requirements for evidence. This material was
obtained from EPA's strategy document and EPA Region II's enforcement
experience (presented at EPA's Regional Workshop). Further legal questions
should be addressed to Regional Counsels or to counsel for the state or local
enforcement agency.
GENERAL
Owner or Operator
t As defined in the general provisions of 40 CFR Part 61, this term
applies to both the demolition or renovation contractor, as the
operator of the stationary source, and the facility owner or
operator who purchases the services of (acquiring ownership or
control over) the contractor. Hence, both parties are liable to the
requirements of the NESHAP standard.
t Enforcement authorities may focus remedial action on whichever party
has other, similar subject activities. Generally, that party is the
demolition or renovation contractor.
68
-------
• In some cases, ownership of property under state law may shift from
the facility owner or operator to tne demolition or renovation
contractor.
Authority for Inspections
• Statutory authority for inspection is under Section 114 of the Clean
Air Act.
• Allowed activities during inspection include sampling, photography,
and visual observations: the inspector need not be a certified VE
observer to judge whether there is an emission.
• if a facility denies access to an inspector, a warrant may be
ootained to perform the inspection. In order to obtain a warrant,
the agency should show either that the inspection is scheduled under
a "neutral" inspection format, or that there is probable cause to
suspect violations of the subject source. The agency must obtain
the exact street address of the site and name of the owner in order
to have a warrant issued.
• If an inspector discovers obvious violations of the asbestos NESHAP
during an inspection, he or she is not empowered by EPA to order a
work stoppage to curtail asbestos emissions. This order would be
made, when necessary, at the level of a Division Director. Other
orders may be feasible under the power of local health agencies.
69
-------
Enforcement Options
t These options were summarized in the National Regulatory Strategy
section. The enforcing agency has the option of pursuing informal
action, administrative action, or judicial action to remedy ongoing
violations and/or deter future violations. Informal or
administrative actions are typically the easiest to perform, but
only judicial actions allow EPA to assess and collect penalties.
t The source may also be subject to regulation under RCRA and/or
CERCLA due to improper waste disposal, and air enforcement personnel
should coordinate their actions with hazardous waste enforcement
actions, if applicable.
• Other types of relief may be sought besides monetary compensation.
For example, in United States versus Cleveland Wrecking Company, the
Consent Decree included the following provisions:
If there is uncertainty as to whether FAM is present at a
demolition or renovation site, the defendant will conduct
sampling and analysis prior to commencing work activities which
would disturb such material.
Supervisors knowledgeable about asbestos dangers and
regulations are required at each worksite where FAM is present.
Inspection access is allowed to EPA representatives, for all of
the defendant's worksites, for a period of 3 years.
70
-------
TYPES OF EVIDENCE
Bulk Samples
t Sampling is critical because this is the only positive proof that
materials contain asbestos.
• Inspectors must use chain-of-custody forms and quality assurance
procedures to ensure that samples are traceable, to allow for use as
evidence in court.
t The Clean Air Act does not specifically state whether samples should
be split with the site owner or operator, although this is required
under RCRA. Sample splitting is advised when the owner/operator
requests it, in order to encourage good relations between the agency
and source.
• Shelf Life is not an issue for asbestos bulk samples.
Admissions
t Admissions of illegal activity from owners or operators, or their
representatives and employees, are vital to refuting arguments
typically made by the defendants when subject to penalties. The
following questions should be posed to site personnel during the
initial inspection:
71
-------
Has the owner/operator ever engaged in removal of FAM prior to
the current activity?
Is the owner/operator aware of EPA regulations governing
removal of FAM? Are wetting, bagging, etc., being performed?
Did the owner/operator search the current work site for FAM
prior to startup of work activity? How was the search
conducted?
Is there an economic incentive to avoid handling FAM as
required by the regulation? What is the savings in money or
time?
Have areas containing FAM been vandalized? What damage was
caused?
Are current dust emissions (if seen) believed to contain
asbestos?
Contractors may divulge such information willingly due to concern
for their health or ignorance of the regulations. While an
admission may not always be conclusive proof of a violation, it may
be used to question the credibility of the defendant(s) if
subsequent contradictory statements are made.
Pnotographs
• Used to help familiarize legal, nontechnical personnel with site
activity.
72
-------
0 Date and descn'De photo subject on the back of each print. A log
should be used or frame numbers recorded on the inspection form,
particularly if different sites are photographed on the same roll of
film. Traceability of each print may be questioned by defendants in
order to establish doubt of credibility during legal proceedings.
Observations
t Record observations, relevant statements by site personnel, and
visible emissions of dust to the atmosphere, on inspection forms.
Each agency determines policy on providing copies of field data to
the site owner or operator.
73
-------
9. DEMOLITION AND RENOVATION
ONSITE INVESTIGATION
BACKGROUND
• Since the asbestos standard is based on no visible emissions or
air-cleaning provision, EPA must perform onsite inspections to
determine compliance.
• There are three principal reasons for performing demolition or
renovation inspections:
To verify the quantity of friable asbestos if a notification is
received reporting less than 80 linear meters or 15 square
meters;
To determine if proper asbestos removal and disposal operations
are employed after receiving notice of greater than the
previously stated quantity of friable asbestos; and
To investigate demolition or renovation sites for which no
notification was received.
• The following methods are used to identify facilities which do not
notify EPA of subject activity:
Coordinate with state, county, and city departments of
building, health (OSHA), and education;
Coordinate with industry personnel, such as the National
Association of Demolition Contractors;
74
-------
Survey publications such as:
National Wrecking and Salvage Journal
Newspapers
City magazines
Coordinate with Federal agencies such as HUD (get names of
contractors for their Community Development Block Grant
Program) and OSHA;
Some public utilities may report notices to terminate service,
a tip-off to building vacancy and/or sale;
Surveillance by EPA personnel.
• The inspection procedures discussed in this section are based
primarily on a document entitled S.22 EPA Demolition and Renovation
Inspection Procedures (October 1975), with some modifications based
on more up-to-date experience.
INSPECTION EQUIPMENT CHECKLIST
• Protective Equipment—As previously emphasized.
• Employee Identification—i.e., proper credentials to prove authority
for performing the inspection.
• Copy of Asbestos NESHAP Regulation--May help to resolve
disagreements if the owner, operator, or contractor is not familiar
with the regulation.
75
-------
t Clipboard and Writing Implements--May want to carry pocket size if
ladders must be climbed.
• Field Data Collection Check!ist--Wi11 be discussed later.
t Camera (With Flash)--Take photographs of each sample location and
visible emission sources, if possible.
• Flashlight and Binoculars—Inspection of dark basements and closer
look at inaccessible locations.
• Tape Measure—To estimate amounts of friable asbestos material and
to locate sample sites, or may pace off distances as a rough
estimate.
• Chain of Custody Forms and Labels--To properly distinguish each
sample and to maintain a record of sample possession at all times.
• Sampling Equipment—In order to collect samples within the
guidelines provided in the "Asbestos in Schools" program, the
following items may be required (discussed later in the sampling
section):
sample containers;
water spray bottle;
adhesive tape;
tools (pen knife, tweezers, etc.);
76
-------
drop cloth;
handiwipes or paper towels; and
plastic bags.
PRE-ENTRY OBSERVATIONS AND PREPARATIONS
• Survey Building/Structure from Outside—Look for visible emissions.
• Observe Waste Storage Area—To get an idea of the quantity and
condition of the waste being created.
• Note Land Use Surrounding Site--May result in discovery of illegal
disposal procedures.
• Sketch General Site Layout—To allow better familiarity with the
area(s) to be inspected and to verify that all pertinent locations
of the site are incorporated into the inspection.
• Check Protective Gear—It is highly recommended that all appropriate
safety equipment is available. An inspector should not assume that
the owner, operator, or contractor will supply the equipment.
SITE ENTRY
• Contact Proper Official—Generally the EPA inspector should ask for
the owner/operator or site foreman (if demolition or renovation is
in progress).
77
-------
• Show Credentials--Exp1ain the authority and purpose of the
inspection.
• Address Liability Waiver—Signing or not signing of a liability
waiver is an issue that should be addressed by the air pollution
control agency prior to performing any inspections. A policy should
be established and understood by all inspectors.
PRE-INSPECTION INTERVIEW
• Establish Identity of Responsible Individuals—Document the name and
title of anyone who assists with the inspection. Also, identify the
lines of authority to the owner of a facility if there are several
management levels.
• Discuss Proposed Activity—Discuss any necessary information in the
notification. Also, determine which emission standards the owner or
operator elects in order to comply with the regulation.
• Discuss Logical Sequence for Inspecting Site—To promote overall
efficiency of the inspection. May also discuss any safety
requirements that may differ at areas of the site.
-------
IDENTIFYING FRIABLE MATERIALS
• An inspector may find any one of the following combinations:
friable asbestos-containing material;
friable nonasbestos-containing material; and
nonfriable asbestos-containing material.
• It should be noted that asbestos-containing material that is
nonfriable under normal conditions may become friable after fire or
water damage. This emphasizes the importance of touching and
sampling all material that appears friable.
Typical Friable Asbestos Materials
• Spray Applied Materials (fibrous, fluffy):
fireproofing;
decorative coatings; and
condensation control.
• Hand Trowelled Insulation (granular, cementitous):
acoustical insulation; and
thermal insulation (such as pipe lagging).
• Molded Insulation:
thermal insulation (such as pipe wraps).
79
-------
Typical Nonfriable Asbestos Materials
• Asbestos/Cement Sheet (if broken this may develop friable edges),
• Vinyl asbestos floor tile.
• Roofing felts.
• Coatings and sealants (petroleum or resinous-based).
• Millboard.
Prevalent Uses
t Asbestos was used in buildings from the 1940s through the early
1970s.
• Some of the most common sites to look for asbestos:
heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems; and
public meeting places; i.e., auditoriums, libraries,
gymnasiums, etc.
• Friable asbestos material may be exposed or concealed.
80
-------
DEMOLITION AND RENOVATION - EMISSION SOURCES
• During an inspection of ongoing asbestos removal at a demolition or
renovation site the following operations and equipment are most
likely to generate emissions:
material wetting;
material removal (stripping);
unit or section cutting or disjoining;
local exhaust ventilation/collection system;
waste handling and cleanup (dry vacuuming, wet vacuuming, wet
mopping, sweeping, hand wiping, etc.); and
waste di sposal.
EMISSION CONTROL OPTIONS
Work Practices
• During the removal of friable asbestos material prior to or during
demolition/renovation activities, the owner may choose to follow the
work practice (wetting and handling) requirements of the standard to
control emissions.
81
-------
Local Exhaust Evacuation Collection Systems
• An owner or operator may choose to utilize an evacuation system in
conjunction with a control device (commonly a baghouse) to bypass
wetting requirements when FAM is removed from facility components,
either before or after their removal from the facility. The control
system must, however, meet the no visible emission standard or
comply with the aforementioned operating parameters.
NEGATIVE AIR SYSTEM
A negative pressure air system may be used wich containment barriers to
reduce the pressure in an enclosed work area, protec,ing against large-scale
fioer release in the event of a breach in the containment. This system may
also reduce worker exposure by increasing room air turnover rate. The system
should be designed as follows:
• Windows and doors are sealed as usual;
• Locate exhaust units at a maximum distance from worker access
openings, allowing makeup air to traverse the work area as much as
possible;
• Size exhaust system to provide at least four air changes per hour;
82
-------
"NEGATIVE AIR" SYSTEM
00
to
DIRTY
ROOM
WINDOWS AND DOORS
COVERED WITH POLYETHYLENE
SHOWER
ROOM
CLEAN ROOM
(LOCKERS)
CLEAN
EXHAUST
HEPA FILTERS
AIR FLOW
-------
• Final filter must be a High Efficiency Participate Air (HEPA)
filter, rated for at least 99.97 percent efficiency with 0.03 ym OOP
particles (Military Standard No. 282--Certification No. UL586).
Prefilters (5 ym, 10 ym, etc.) should be used to extend HEPA filter
life;
• Exhaust system should run 24 hrs/day until job is complete, and at
least 4 hours after job completion; and
t Replace prefliters and/or HEPA filter if AP across exhaust system
exceeds 1.0 in. H20.
See EPA-560/5-83-002 for additional guidance on negative air systems.
FIELD DATA COLLECTION CHECKLIST
• The 2-page demolition and renovation inspection checklist (attached)
was developed by GCA based on improvement of the S.22 checklist
originally developed by EPA in 1975.
• A blank copy is provided in Appendix B for your use if you choose to
adopt the checklist.
84
-------
DEMOLITION AND RENOVATION
FIELD DATA COLLECTION CHECKLIST
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Site location (Address): 3 I OO L
Use (office, retail, industry): XtA.'Sor'&'iA.Cg^ Ce
Type of Construction: S"te.&( sk.2 IcstoiA •) reHA,f\5(nt-^-.
Size (number floors, square footage): (Q s^&rld*)" 5O,C>OO 54
Age - Constructed: (93 D
Renovated: l9 • OO^ f/\ -p
III. ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION
Demolition: , Renovation, lX^ , Condemned
Present status: (\il^.O(J(Xr>Oi<\^ O^Srlc. ;•$ ^^.(^a pt2rTnsr~-f\A^>2.J[_
'II .
' r ' " ' P
pif> Oy^ T^rA. rl&or
0 g <; ' '
o-f/&.'t^q , °f-eJ^-£^ b
-------
If phased renovation
record schedule: J//L fleer
If activity has not begun, obtain work schedule for asbestos removal
(return at that time). Ltbroru ni*4>t/- schedLufedL <£a Tf-arf- 13 Tblu
xVi/<5/tAz_-5 re,rur6iTA,s*^q e^ajl'j, C^ilii^a , /Y~
IV. LOCATION OF FRIABLE MATERIAL \Je.r*ifi ofurf <->t-edL fc
Unit or section removal -
Use of surfactant - y^ Sb/5© polao^e^l^^^efUer/e.^r-, 5% bi UscL DOM.DC.C^ fe.
Water availability - f
Local exhaust ventilation/ , ,,
collection system ^Oi^e. 0-fK.er f^tdAa O?e Cf-
(no visible emissions or corf-H HfPA p(/°(-«r f
air-cleaning) -
f (eor SeoJecL to.-'liv.
Use of barriers -
Other removal technique or procedures -
All
VI. WASTE HANDLING
(Record violations if observed and take samples)
^
Wetting waste: Yes ^ No
Record waste AM
transport throughout xtA-'fo qo - o,^ Uvu
site (including containers) ^^.^^ _ ^^ fo(( T^ k^c. 9-l^T ,'b
be,
Bcb
O-f HoJrKordl
86
-------
POST INSPECTION INTERVIEW
• Discuss Findings with Responsible Individuals--i.e., compliance
status, sampling activity, etc.
• Present Recommendations—which might include:
improve waste handling methods;
use a surfactant;
more thorough job of stripping; and
keep waste FAM wet at all times prior to disposal.
t Delineate Followup Activities--such as additional sampling or
analysis activity, or additional inspections to observe operations.
87
-------
SITE EXIT OBSERVATIONS
• Resurvey Site from Outside--the location/arrangement of certain
aspects of the site may be more clear than was noted during the
presurvey.
• Observe Waste Storage Area—if it was not evident prior to entering.
• Note Changes Since Site Entry—sometimes good work practices
observed during the formal inspection will not continue after
departure of the EPA inspector.
INSPECTION OF LANDFILL OR WASTE DISPOSAL SITE
• To complete an inspection of a demolition or renovation site the EPA
inspector must also verify that the waste FAM is properly disposed.
t The generator of FAM is responsible for any waste handling
violations even at the waste disposal site.
Procedure
• Upon site entry the site operator should be contacted to determine
if the landfill is permitted to operate and determine the expiration
date of permit.
88
-------
• Determine what requirements were met for the site operator to obtain
a permit and what regulatory agency permitted the site.
t Inspect site to determine if there are any violations of the
regulations (discussed earlier); i.e.,
no visible emission; or
cover with 6 inches of fill within 24 hours; or
cover with dust suppression agent within 24 hours.
DISPOSAL SITE FIELD DATA COLLECTION CHECKLIST
• The 4-page waste disposal site inspection checklist (attached) was
developed by GCA based on field inspection experience.
• A blank copy is provided in Appendix B for your use if you choose to
adopt the checklist.
89
-------
LANDFILL FIELD DATA COLLECTION CHECKLIST
SITE NAME: ft "$ C
Address: \~L"$
WYvl^\fHcuA , MY. \HO30
Date and time: ._. _ _ _,,
Weather Conditions:
Investigator:
Site Contact: Name: j"ot.
Affiliation: ?
Phone: (7 | fc) 3 4 5" -
Confidentiality Claim Asserted: Yes \ _ .No
Permission to take photographs on site: Yes X No
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
Operating Schedule:
hr/d ~] VL d/wk 5 wk/yr 5 £• d/yr 2.C Cj
Scheduled shutdowns : r^tovve^
Permitted Site:
Yes )( No , if yes then permit number and effective dates_
-------
Permitted by: fOeuj NwV Vg o,z
Requirements to obtain permit(s):
_ £> ' dici'ity
SITE DESCRIPTION;
Years of operation _ (& _ , expected life span _ 3- 5
Surrounding land use:*
(*Note North, South, East, and West Orientations)
Tc^A -TC,
r'\ c
Type of landfill (area, slope/ramp, trench, pit/quarry) - — r- \
Run-on /Run-off control measures -
^vji^VvxlO W^tTi ^roin.vi«A -h> on-5vfe
Kerr^tH U^C.li ar^^,
Wind erosion control measures - Tre^ a\t>A«i. ^-Ve
SITE CONTACT INTERVIEW - ASBESTOS WASTE HANDLING;
How was it deposited (e.g. manually off-loaded, dumped semi-
automatically)?
How was it containerized? T^oo :?> f »cxi-ix<- t.
Where was it actually deposited? (note on sketch) TA ^e iXA.wai-tn cv\
10 » tUo
91
When was asbestos-containing waste last received? TLo° ciayi f-\or -V« yft*- v/»5i"r
Y
Type of waste and generator? _- \v Q_V
r^T^VV* Rtr
Over the previous two months, how many asbestos-containing waste
shipments have been received? £>\n.
Where has the material been deposited? _ ^l ^e^e -\K* U.
of
-------
VISUAL OBSERVATIONS:
Waste sufficiently covered? (depth of cover material) v/W-V-^ A*pe*y "V
^^^il'^t^A fc" ^ C'J* '« "*** *KUou^
Type of cbver material? $v\\ .^te^ed ^ si4e- .
Is a dust suppressant agent used? NJ o Type?
Signs or fences present? e -£<-.Attti •
IcoV^^, 4^4^ VUA^ T *>$. ^et -K, tl\e -to^cU «^i \
Any inactive (closed) portions?
vi ^
Is any asbestos-containing waste exposed?
Mo
If the material is exposed ---
Was it deposited with the past 24 hours?
Is it sealed in leak-tight containers
and are the containers intact?
Are the containers properly labeled?
Are visible emissions present?
SAMPLING (repeat for each sample taken); Js/,
Sample identification number(s) -
Sample location(s) -
Visible emissions present? IV]^
(*Note: take photographs)
FOR INACTIVE SITES OR PORTIONS THEREOF;
Are visible emissions present? NJo
Are warning signs posted? M0
Does a fence or natural barrier surround the site? or ^5
Has the asbestos-containing waste been covered by six Inches of material
and does a vegetative cover exist? or v,
— 7
-------
SKETCH OF DISPOSAL SITE (PLAN VIEW)
(Include Site Entrance and Boundaries, Roadways, Active Cells, Closed Cells,
Borrow Areas, Direction of Prevailing Wind, Location of Deposited Asbestos-Containing Waste)
MM"
'CVx/v
\ j
z
D
1V\.<+\KTt
Em ?d,
';
11 c i /7ft
qoo^
J
/'s /
^ /<_
K" f;:
e «xc C-
-------
10. ASBESTOS BULK SAMPLING
PURPOSE
t The purpose of bulk sampling is to determine if friable material
contains regulated amounts of asbestos (>1 percent by weight) and,
therefore, whether the owner or operator is subject to the Asbestos
NESHAP, and which friable materials must be handled accordingly.
• There will be no discussion of ambient level sampling or analysis
since there is no regulation under the EPA NESHAPs program.
PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT
Since there are no specific requirements for protective equipment under
NESHAPs, it is recommended that the OSHA safety requirements be followed as
previously discussed in Sections 6 and 7. The following is a brief summary:
• Respirator—asbestos-rated filter mask or cartridge type respirator,
or better if the situation warrants it.
t Clothing—disposable Tyvek®!-piece suit with booties and hood, or
equivalent, and PVC gloves are recommended if a large number of
samples are taken, or if materials surrounding sample site must be
disassembled for access (e.g., ceiling tiles).
94
-------
t Hardhat, safety glasses, safety shoes, and ear protection are
recommended, and may be required by site owner or contractor.
SAMPLING EQUIPMENT
Some items that may be useful obtaining bulk samples from a demolition or
renovation site include the following:
• Sample Containers—Any dry, clean container such as a 35mm film
canister or plastic bag.
• Mater Spray Bottle--For wetting a surface prior to sampling to
prevent generation of dust.
• Adhesive Tape--To seal the sample container and repair a sampled
area, such as a pipe lagging, if necessary.
§ Tools, Drop Cloth--Tools such as metal tweezers, a pen knife, or
scissors may be useful. A drop cloth would be used to avoid
contamination of an area if necessary.
t Handiwipes or Paper Towels--To clean up a sampled area and tools
following sampling to prevent contamination of subsequent samples.
• Plastic Bags—To place waste material, if any, generated during the
sampling exercise. The bags should be properly sealed and disposed
of as asbestos-containing material.
95
-------
SITE SELECTION
The NESHAPs regulation does not make any specific recommendations for
bulk sample site selections, therefore, we recommend that the guidelines
developed by TSCA for their "Asbestos in Schools" program will be considered.
The following lists the TSCA guidelines:
Establish Sampling Areas
• Each area should consist of homogenous friable material applied in
the same time period.
• Use building records, history of renovations or additions, and
visual inspection to determine homogeneity.
Identify Sites Within*Areas
t Identify at least 3 sample sites per sampling area.
for large areal applications, use random number method
contained in EPA-560/13-80-017 to assure random site selection,
for line applications (i.e., pipes, ducts, I-beams) GCA
recommends a modified random number method to assure random
site selection.
96
-------
COLLECTION METHODS
Again, as recommended by the TSCA rule, the following guidance is
suggested for collection of samples.
Prepare Sampling Area
• Spread a dropcloth under the sample activity area, if necessary.
• Wet sample area with a light water mist to reduce fiber release.
Collect Sample (TSCA Recommendations)
• Gently twist the open end of the sampling container into the
material. A core of the material should fall into the container.
Or, a utensil can be used to scrap a sample into a container. A
microscopist only needs about half of a full 35mm film canister to
perform analysis by PLM. Be sure to penetrate any paint or
protective coating and all the layers of the material. If the
sampling container or utensil cannot penetrate the material,
consider whether the material is really friable or not.
t Tightly close the sampling container; wipe its exterior with a damp
cloth to remove any material which may have adhered to it during
sampling.
97
-------
• Tape the sampling container shut to prevent the accidental opening
of the container during shipment or handling.
• Record the unique sample I.D. number chosen at random on a label and
tape the label to the corresponding sampling container.
CLEANUP PROCEDURES
• Photograph sample site, recording time, date, and exact location.
• Clean sample tools, if used, and discard dropcloth and cleanup rags
in plastic bags sealed with tape. When final sample is taken,
discard protective clothing in plastic bags sealed with tape.
• If necessary, repair sample site with tape and plastic to minimize
fiber release prior to the demolition or renovation activity.
QUALITY ASSURANCE
The recommendations developed by TSCA for the "Asbestos in Schools"
program relative to sampling of asbestos materials consists of the following:
Sample I.D. Numbers
Assign nonsystematic unique numbers for each sample and split sample to
prevent bias during analysis.
98
-------
Chain of Custody Forms
In order to assure that the samples are properly identified and tracked
throughout the analysis, the use of a "Chain of Custody Record" has been
recommended by EPA (attached).
Split Samples
• Establish a representative number of split samples:
based on guidance in EPA-560/13-80-017,
QA program may encompass several job sites.
• Collect consistent split samples:
obtain identical amounts of homogenous material for each split
sample pair.
• Integrate split sample analysis with QA program:
determine laboratory acceptability based on guidance in
EPA-560/13-80-017,
resolve split sample disagreements,
reanalyze samples, if necessary.
99
-------
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
Projtct Codt
Propel Name
SAMPLERS (Signature)
I.D.
NO.
DATE
TIME
LOCATION
REMARKS
Relinquished by (Signature)
Date/Time
Received by (Signature!
Relinquished by (Signature)
Date/Time
Received by (Signature)
Relinquished by (Signature)
Date/Time
Received by (Signature)
Relinquished by (Signature)
Date/Time
Received by (Signature)
Relinquished by (Signature)
Date /Time
Received for Laboratory by
(Signature)
Date/Time
Remarks
-------
11. LABORATORY ANALYSIS
INTRODUCTION
• The analysis of a bulk sample is intended to detect the
quantity, as well as the specific type of asbestos for each
sampling area.
• Following the collection of bulk samples the EPA inspector or other
EPA authority is responsible for the following steps:
selection of analysis method,
selection of qualified laboratory,
statistical interpretation of results.
ANALYSIS METHODS
The NESHAPs program has no specific guidelines on analysis methods for
characterizing asbestos in bulk samples. Therefore, the guidelines under the
TSCA "Asbestos In Schools" program published in 40 CFR Part 763 Appendix A are
used.
Polarized-Light Microscopy (PLM)
• Based on optical crystallographic properties, the PLM method must be
performed by a microscopist with formal training in Optical
Mineralogy.
101
-------
t PLM gives a qualitative differentiation between asbestos and
nonasbestos fibers along with a quantitative estimate of percent
asbestos.
• Fiber identification requires determination of the following optical
properties:
morphology;
color and pleochroism;
refractive indices;
birefringence;
extinction characteristics; and
sign of elongation.
• PLM specifications:
detection limit = <1%,
resolution limit = 1 um length (can identify fibers as small as
a 0.1 ym diameter if length exceeds 1 ym),
average 1980 cost = $43 per sample.
X-ray Diffraction (XRD)
• TSCA recommends XRD to confirm the identity of asbestos in samples
analyzed by PLM.
• XRD is based on crystal diffraction of x-rays. It is subject to
interferences from nonasbestos minerals.
102
-------
• XRD specifications:
detection limit: undetermined,
resolution limit: undetennined,
average 1980 cost = $70 per sample.
Electron Microscope (EM) - Not approved for TSCA rule.
• Two methods:
transmission electron microscopy (TEM),
scanning electron microscopy (SEM).
t SEM and TEM give better resolution than PLM.
• TEM resolution is better than SEM, but also more costly.
• EM average cost is $188 per sample (1980).
Other Techniques
• Infrared Absorption (IR) and Differential Thermal Analysis (DTA) are
only useful for high asbestos concentrations.
t Phase Contrast is only used for analysis of air filter samples.
103
-------
QA AND REPORTING
EPA QA Program
• Laboratory perfonnance based on correct identification of positive
(asbestos) and negative (nonasbestos) samples.
t Four samples to each accepting laboratory contain different types of
asbestos and nonasbestos (minerals, fiberglass or mineral wool,
natural and synthetic fibers) material.
• Sample rounds available about twice yearly.
t Updated list of participating labs available by calling RTI at
1-800-334-8571, extension 6741.
New Laboratory Evaluation
• TSCA has presented recommendations for evaluating performance of new
laboratories (EPA 560/13-80-017 Appendix B) which are based on split
sample evaluations and number of disagreements.
• GCA recommends contracting for complete characterization of mineral
matter; this requires an experienced microscopist.
104
-------
Analysis Report Contents
• Sample I.D. number.
• Analytical method: PLM, and XRD if applicable.
t Sample appearance: homogeneity, identification of subsamples and
number of slides.
• Sample pretreatment (grind, wash and dry, homogenize, or other).
• Amount examined.
• Types of asbestos present, relative percentage of each, and total
percent asbestos in sample.
• Types of nonasbestos fibrous material, relative percentage of each,
and total percent of nonasbestos fibrous material in sample.
• Quantitation method: point count or equivalent estimation.
• Quality control: number of slides per sample and number of splits
per set, QA/QC for equivalent estimation method (if used).
105
-------
Statistical Analysis of Results (EPA-560/13-80-017)
t Calculate confidence interval for the average percent asbestos in a
sampling area.
• Accounts for range of results due to:
analytical techniques;
heterogenous materials; and
sampling errors.
106
-------
12. ASBESTOS INSPECTION EXPERIENCE
Notes
107
-------
Notes
108
-------
Notes
109
-------
ASBESTOS REFERENCES
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Guidance for Controlling Friable
Asbestos-Containing Materials in Buildings. Office of Pesticides and Toxic
Substances, Washington, D.C. EPA-560/5-83-002, March 1983.
U.S. Department of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards. Guidelines for
Assessment and Abatement of Asbestos-Containing Materials in Buildings.
Center for Building Technology, Washington, D.C. NBSIR 83-2688, May 1983.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Asbestos-Containing Materials in School
riuildings: A Guidance Document, Part 1 and 2. Office of Toxic Substances,
Washington, D.C. EPA-450/2-78-014, March 1979.
U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration.
Occupational Exposure to Asbestos: Proposed Rule and Notice of Hearing.
Federal Register Vol. 49, No. 70, Tuesday, April 10, 1984.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Asbestos-Containing Materials in School
Buildings, Guidance for Asbestos Analytical Programs. Draft Report.
EPA-560/13-80-01 7, June 1980.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region VII. Asbestos Exposure
Assessment in Buildings... Inspection Manual. March 1980.
110
-------
The Foundation of the Wall and Ceiling Industry, Washington, D.C. Guide
Specifications for the Abatement of Asbestos Release from Spray- or Trowel -
Applied Materials in Buildings and Other Structures. December 1981.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Interim Method for the Determination of
Asbestiform Minerals in Bulk Insulation Samples. June 1980.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Evaluation of Encapsulants for
Sprayed-On Asbestos-Containing Materials in Buildings. Office of Research and
Development. Cincinnati, OH, 1981.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Support Document/Asbestos-Containing
Materials in Schools/Health Effects and Magnitude of Exposure. Office of
Pesticides and Toxic Substances, Washington, D.C. EPA-560/12-80-003,
October 1980.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Support Document/Asbestos-Containing
Materials in Schools/Economic Impact Analysis of Identification and
Notification. Office of Pesticides and Toxic Substances, Washington, D.C.
EPA-560/12-80-004, November 1980.
National Bureau of Standards, Proceedings of the Workshop on Asbestos:
Definitions and Measurement Methods, held at NBS, Gaithersburg, MD,
18-20 July 1^77. NBS Special Publication 506, Issued November 1978.
Ill
-------
U.S. General Accounting Office, Asbestos In Schools: A Dilemma.
GAO/ttD-82-114, August 31, iy82.
S.22 EPA Demolition and Renovation Inspection Procedures Prepared by
Kenneth B. Malmberg (EPA), SSCD, Washington, D.C. October 1975.
112
-------
APPENDIX A
NATIONAL EMISSION STANDARDS
FOR HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS
SUBPART M - ASBESTOS
113
-------
1365&
Federal Register / Vol. 49, No. 67 / Thursday, April 5, 1984 / Rules and Regulations
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 61
[AO-FRL 2515-4]
National Emission Standards for
Hazardous Air Pollutants;
Amendments to Asbestos Standard
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: Amendments to the national
emission standard for asbestos were
proposed in the Federal Register on July
13,1983 (48 FR 32126). This action
promulgates the amendments under
Section 112 of the Clean Air Act as
amended in 1977. The intended effect of
the amendments is to reinstate work
practice and equipment provisions of the
standard that were held not to be
emission standards by the U.S. Supreme
Court in 1978. They also reword and
rearrange the standard for clarity.
EFFECTIVE DATE: April 5,1984. Under
Section 307(b)(l) of the Clean Air Act,
judicial review of these amendments is
available only by'the filing of a petition
for review in the U.S. Court of Appeals
for the District of Columbia Circuit
within 60 days of today's publication of
this rule. Under Section 307(b)(2) of the
Clean Air Act, the requirements that are
the subject of today's notice may not be
challenged later in civil or criminal
proceedings brought by EPA to enforce
these requirements.
ADDRESSES: Docket. A docket, number
A-83-02, containing information
considered by EPA in development of
the promulgated amendments, is
available for public inspection between
8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through
Friday, at EPA's Central Docket Section
(LE-131), West Tower Lobby, Gallery 1.
401 M Street, SW., Washington, D.C.
20460. A reasonable fee may be charged
for copying.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
Mr. Robert L Ajax. Standards
Development Branch, Emission
Standards and Engineering Division
(MD-13), U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Research Triangle Park, North
Carolina 27711, telephone (919) 541-
5578.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The Amendments
The amendments reinstate portions of
the asbestos NESHAP that were
equipment or work practice
requirements. The Supreme Court held
in Adamo Wrecking Company v. United
States. 434 U.S. 275 (1978) that work
practice requirements of the NESHAP
were not authorized by the 1970
Amendments to the Clean Air Act under
which they were originally promulgated.
The 1977 Amendments to the Act
specifically authorize such
requirements. On June 19,1978 (43 FR
26372), EPA repromulgated many of the
requirements under authority of the 1977
Amendments, and today's action
repromulgates the following remaining
requirements in a new Subpart M of 40
CFR Part 61.
1. Section 61.143 reinstates a
prohibition of surfacing roadways with
asbestos tailings or asbestos containing
waste.
2. Sections 61.145(c) and 61.147{g)
reinstate a partial exemption for
demolition operations for structurally
unsound buildings.
3. Section 61.147(e) reinstates the
requirement that asbestos removed
during demolition or renovation be kept
wet until it is collected for disposal. It
also requires that the asbestos not be
dropped or thrown to the ground or a
lower floor and that asbestos removed
more than 50 feet above ground level be
transported to the ground in dust-tight
chutes or containers (unless it is
removed in units or sections).
4. Section 61.147(f) reinstates
alternative work practices that may be
used for removal of asbestos prior to
demolition when there are freezing
temperature conditions at the point
where the asbestos is being wetted.
5. Section 61.150 reinstates the
prohibition of installation of certain
molded or wet-applied insulating
materials that contain commercial
asbestos.
6. Sections 61.151(a) and 61.152(a)
simply refer to the 'requirements of
Section 61.156T
7. Sections 61.151 (b) and (c); 61.152(b)
(1), (2), and (3); 61.153(a) (2). (3), and (4);
61.154; and 61.156 (c) and (d) reinstate
alternative work practices or equipment
that may be used in lieu of complying
with a no visible emission limit.
8. Sections 61.153(b) and 61.156(b)
reinstate the requirement for warning
signs and fencing around asbestos
waste disposal sites if (1) the owner or
operator chooses to comply with a no
visible emission limit rather than follow
specified work practices, and (2) there is
no natural barrier to deter access by the
general public.
In addition to these requirements,
today's action clarifies the asbestos
NESHAP by rewording and rearranging
it into a new Subpart M of 40 CFR Part
114
Public Participation
The amendments were proposed in
the Federal Register on July 13,1983 (48
FR 32126). To provide interested persons
the opportunity for oral presentation of
data, views, or arguments concerning
the proposed amendments, a public
hearing was held on August 9,1983, at
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
The hearing was open to the public and
each attendee was given an opportunity
' to comment on the proposed
amendments. The public comment
period was from July 13,1983, to
September 9,1983.
Fifteen comment letters were received
and two interested parties testified at
the public hearing concerning issues
relative to the proposed amendments.
The comments have been carefully
considered and, where determined to be
appropriate by the Administrator,
changes have been made to the
proposed amendments.
Summary of Comments and Changes to
the Proposed Amendments
Comments on the proposed
amendments were received from
industry, Federal agencies, State and
local air pollution control agencies, and
private citizens. The following summary
of comments and responses serves as
the basis for the revisions that have
been made to the proposed
amendments. Most of the letters
contained multiple comments, some of
which were outside the scope of this
rulemaking. Those comments have been
summarized in Item No. IV-B-1 of
Docket No. A-83-02. They are being
evaluated in conjunction with the
comprehensive review of the asbestos
NESHAP that is currently underway.
Most of the remaining comments
pertain to the effect that rewording and
rearranging the proposed amendments
had on the original meaning and intent
of the asbestos NESHAP. Some of them
also pertain to the reasonableness of
those requirements being repromulgated
(see list in the section entitled "The
Amendments"). The comments are
discussed below and are organized
according to the sections of the
proposed amendments to which they
pertain.
Section 61.141
One commenter noted that the
proposed definition of "demolition"
deletes the previous reference to "any
related removing or stripping of friable
asbestos materials" and recommended
restoring the definition to the old
wording. The commenter believes that
the new wording may be interpreted to
not include removing and stripping.
-------
Federal Register / Vol. 49, No. 67 / Thursday, April 5, 1984 / Rules and Regulations 13659
EPA intended that the proposed
definition of "demolition" describe the
activities that occur when a facility is
demolished as distinguished from
"renovation," as the term* are used in
the regulation. The primary
distinguishing activity is that load-
supporting structural members are
wrecked or taken out in a demolition
operation but not in a renovation.
Asbestos stripping or removal may
occur in either but should not be used to
define the primary activity of demolition
or renovation. Section 61.145 clearly
states that when demolition or
renovation operations meet certain
specified criteria regarding asbestos
materials in the facility, they are subject
to the regulation. Also, 5 61.147 clearly
specifies that stripping or removal of
asbestos materials during demolition or
renovation must be carried out in
accordance with the standard. It is not
necessary to repeat these provisions in
the definition of "demolition."
One commenter noted that the
proposed definition of renovation would
apply only to removal of asbestos and
not to stripping and recommended that
the new definition be as comprehensive
as the old one.
EPA did not intend to omit the word
"stripping" from the definition of
"renovation" at the time of proposal.
However, EPA has reevaluated the
definition to determine the wording that
would be the most useful and
informative for the regulation. As
discussed in the response to the
previous comment about the definition
of "demolition," the terms should be
defined to describe the type of activity
,that is being carried out at a facility,
regardless of the presence or absence of
asbestos material, and the definition of
"renovation" has been revised
accordingly.
One commenter recommended
restoring the phrase "based on operating
experience" to the definition of
"planned renovation" to clarify the
basis for predicting future renovations
involving asbestos removal. The phrase
was in the old definition. The
commenter's recommendation has been
incorporated into the amendments.
One commenter requested
clarification of the definition of
"emergency renovation operation." He
asked whether'it would include
malfunctions, such as leaking valves,
that require the removal of asbestos-
containing insulation. Although these
malfunctions are expected to occur, they
are not planned or scheduled.
EPA considers the type of occurrence
described by the commenter to be part
of a planned renovation operation and
not an emergency renovation operation.
The commenter indicated that although
the situations are "not planned or
scheduled, they are expected to occur.
They would, therefore, fit the definition
of "planned renovation operation" in
S 61.141 that says. "Individual
nonscheduled operations are included if
a number of such operations can be
predicted to occur during a given period
of time."
Section 61.145
One commenter noted that the word
"or" between "operators" and
"demolition" in § 61.145(e) should be
changed to "of." He indicated that the
proper wording would show what he
believed to be the Agency's intent to
> limit applicability of the regulations to
only "wreckers and renovators" and not
to include facility owners and operators.
The commenter is correct that the
word "or" should be changed to "of,"
and this correction has been made.
However, the commenter's
interpretation that the regulations apply
to only "wreckers and renovators" and
not to facility owners and operators is
incorrect. The general provisions of 40
CFR Part 61 define "owner or operator"
as any person who owns, leases,
operates, controls, or supervises a
stationary source (40 CFR 61.02(1)). The
stationary source in this case is the
demolition or renovation operation. The
demolition or renovation contractor
would clearly be considered an owner
or operator by "operating" the
stationary source. The facility owner or
operator, by purchasing the services of
the demolition or renovation contractor,
acquires ownership and control of the
operation and would, therefore, be the
"owner" for purposes of this standard.
Therefore, the standard applies to both
the contractor and the facility owner or
operator.
Sections 61.146 and 61.147
One commenter believes that the
wording in §§ 61.146 and 61.147 is vague
with respect to identifying who is
subject to the requirements, unlike the
wording in §§81.142, 61.143. 61.144,
61.148, and 61.149, which is restrictive in
describing the regulated party.
EPA believes that the applicability of
§§ 61.146 and 61.147 as described in
5 61.145 adequately identifies those
subject to the requirements of the
demolition and renovation standard.
One commenter questioned the intent
of § 61.147(e)(l). The regulation requires
that asbestos materials be adequately
wetted to ensure that they remain wet
during all remaining stages of demolition
or renovation and related handling
operations. The commenter asked
whether this requirement should be
115
interpreted to mean that the asbestos
has to stay wet even after it is properly
bagged and sealed.
The intent of the requirement to keep
friable asbestos materials wet during all
remaining stages of demolition was to
ensure that the asbestos materials that
have been removed or stripped but not
yet disposed of are not allowed to dry
out so that asbestos fibers become
airborne. If they are properly sealed in
leak-tight containers or bags while wet,
they should not dry out before they can
be transferred to an acceptable disposal
site. In any case, after they are bagged,
the waste disposal requirements in
i 61.152 (and not { 61.147) would apply
to the handling of the asbestos
materials. To^larify the meaning of this
portion of the standard, the wording of
§ 61.147(e)(l) has been revised to
indicate that the asbestos materials
must be kept wet until they are collected
for disposal in accordance with § 61.152.
They would be considered "collected"
when they are properly bagged.
Section 61.150
One commenter asked for clarification
of the intent of § 61.150, which prohibits
the installation of certain»asbestos-
containing insulating materials. It was
not clear to him whether the prohibition
affects manufacturing operations that
use parts containing asbestos such as
grommets, gaskets, string,.etc. in their
products.
The preamble of the Federal Register
notice that contained the original
standard for insulating materials (39 FR
38064; October 25,1974) discusses the
intended applicability of the prohibition.
It is clear fom that discussion that the
prohibition was intended to apply to
field installation of such insulating
products as molded, asbestos-reinforced
blocks, sheets, and semicircular sections
for pipe insulation; and powdered
asbestos cement products mixed into a
slurry and used to insulate irregular
shapes. These installations would have
been associated with construction
activities on buildings and other
facilities. Therefore, the prohibition
would not affect manufacturing
operations that use asbestos-containing
parts in their products. The regulation
has been reworded to reflect EPA's
intended effect of the prohibition.
Section 61.154
One commenter pointed out that the
units in § 81.154(a)(l)(iii) do not properly
relate square meters to square yards,
resulting in a lowering of the weight of
the filter by about 20 percent from the
old requirement; i.e., 14 oz./sq. yd. is not
equal to 14 oz./sq. meter. In addition, he
-------
13660 Federal Register / Vol. 49, No. 67 / Thursday, April 5, 1984 / Rules and Regulations
pointed out that the use of V\t inch is
not in keeping with EPA'a metric
program. The errors noted by the
commenter have been corrected in the
final rule.
Section 81.155
One commenter requested
clarification of the Agency's intent in
{ 61.155, which requires that existing
sources covered by the asbestos
NESHAP provide to the Agency within
90 days information regarding their
asbestos emission control methods. The
commenter asked if renotification and
resubmission would be required if they
had already complied with these same
requirements in the old designation
S 61.24.
EPA does not intend that existing
sources of asbestos emissions resubmit
notifications that were originally
required by the standard promulgated in
1973. The wording of } 61.155 has been
revised to accurately reflect EPA's
intent.
M/sce//aneous
One commenter expressed the opinion
that the proposed amendments do not
sufficiently correct the weakness of the
NESHAP regulations and that they
represent a "crude slap in the face to
asbestos victims and will create health
hazards of such proportions that new
generations of asbestos victims will be
guaranteed." He supported his opinion
with the following arguments:
1. The no visible emission limit is not
adequate for regulating airborne
asbestos because it does not take into
account the substantial asbestos disease
risk when emissions that are not visible
are present.
2. The proposed reinstatement of the
exemption from certain wetting
requirements during demolition
operations in freezing temperatures
should not be allowed. Weather
conditions that do not allow wetting
should also not allow asbestos to be
removed. Wetting requirements are
important because they can reduce dust
levels by a power of 10.
3. Allowing exceptions when local
entities pronounce buildings structurally
unsound is tantamount to opening a way
for widespread violation of health
practices.
4. Under no circumstances should
visible emissions be allowed.
5. All references to the economic
impact should be dropped. EPA should
concern itself with the economic impact
on society, which ends up paying for
disease victims produced by inadequate
work regulations.
The first four of the commenter's
statements concern issues that are
currently being investigated in the
review of the asbestos NESHAP: the no
visible emission limit, the exemption
from wetting requirements during
freezing weather, and the exemption for
structurally unsound buildings. EPA will
evaluate the effect of these provisions
and determine whether they need to be
revised. That evaluation is beyond the
scope of today's rulemaking, however.
The amendments are intended to
reinstate the provisions of the original
NESHAP and not to include new
provisions or delete any of the original
ones. Therefore, no changes are being
made to these portions of the proposed
amendments.
In response to the commenter's
suggestion to drop all references to the
economic impact of the proposed
amendments, the Agency believes that
economic impact on the regulated
entities is one of many factors that
should be considered when setting
standards under Section 112 of the
Clean Air Act. Any adverse economic
impact on society resulting from
inadequate regulations for a hazardous
air pollutant would be of concern to EPA.
as it would be a consequence of adverse
public health effects. The current review
of the NESHAP will include an
evaluation of this aspect of regulating
asbestos to determine if more stringent
requirements are needed.
One commenter said that the
requirement in § 61.146(c)(3) to explain
the techniques of estimation of the
amount of asbestos for certain
demolition jobs seems to be a new
requirement because he could not locate
it in the old regulation. The requirement
was in § 61.22(d)(l)(ii) of the old
regulation.
One commenter said that States that
are enforcing the asbestos NESHAP
sometimes have a different
interpretation of regulations than EPA
and suggested that EPA provide
clarification of intent for the States.
Under the Clean Air Act. States are
free to require more stringent asbestos
emission control measures than those in
the asbestos NESHAP. EPA does,
however*provide EPA enforcement
determinations to States that have been
delegated authority to enforce the
NESHAP. These determinations include
EPA's interpretations of portions of the
regulation as questions arise concerning
them, and they are very useful in
ensuring consistency of enforcement
among the States and EPA Regional
Offices.
One commenter said that there is a
statement in the proposal preamble that
is not true. It says, "Demolition and
renovation contractors typically
transport the asbestos they remove from
116
a facility to a waste disposal site on a
daily basis." The commenter stated that
the economics of doing this would be
astronomical. For example, the cost of
hauling a small number of bags to a
disposal site 40 miles away would be
very high, and the contractor would wait
until a full load had accumulated.
The Agency has carefully considered
this comment and concluded that no
changes to the regulation are needed
since it refers to a discussion in the
preamble to the proposed amendments.
There are no requirements in the
NESHAP that asbestos waste be
transported to a disposal" site daily.
Three commenters said that the
amendments improve the clarity and
readability of the asbestos NESHAP and
two indicated that the required work
practices are currently being used by
their companies. Two commenters noted
typographical errors, which have been
corrected in the final rule. Other minor
changes were made in the final rule to
ensure that the new wording accurately
reflects the intent of the original
regulation and to further clarify the
requirements.
Docket
The docket is an organized and
complete file of all the information
submitted to or otherwise considered by
EPA in the development of this
rulemaking. The principal purposes of
the docket are: (1) To allow interested
parties to identify readily and locate
documents so that they can effectively
participate in the rulemaking process;
and (2) to serve as the record in case of
judicial review, except for interagency
review materials (§ 307(d)(7)(A)).
Miscellaneous
A review of this regulation has begun.
This review will include an assessment
of such factors as the need for
integration with other programs, the
existence of alternative methods,
enforceability, improvements in
emission control technology and health
data, and reporting requirements.
Under E.0.12291. EPA must judge
whether a regulation is "major" and
therefore subject to the requirement of a
Regulatory Impact Analysis. This
regulation is not major because it does
not meet any of the criteria specified in
the Executive Ofder regarding the
annual effect on the economy; increase
in cost or prices; or adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or the ability of
U.S. enterprises to compete with foreign
enterprises.
Information collection requirements
associated with this rule (40 CFR 61.07.
-------
Federal Register / Vol. 49. No. 67 / Thursday. April 5. 1984 / Rules and Regulations 13661
61.09, 61.10, 61.146, 81.148, and 61.155)
have been approved by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) under
the provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1980.44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq. and have been assigned OMB
control number 2000-0264.
This regulation was submitted to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review as required by E.O.
12291.
Pursuant to the provisions of 5 U.S.C.
605(b). I hereby certify that this rule, if
promulgated, will not have a significant
economic impact on any small entities.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 61
Air pollution control, Asbestos,
Beryllium, Hazardous materials,
Mercury, Vinyl chloride.
Dated; March 30.1984.
William D. Ruckelshaui,
Administrator.
PART 61—[AMENDED]
40 CFR Part 61 is amended by
redesignating Subpart B (|§ 61.20-61.25j
as Subpart M and revising the new
Subpart M to read as follows:
Subpart M—National Emission Standard for
Asbestos
Sec.
61.140 Applicability.
61.141 Definitions.
61.142 Standard for asbestos mills.
61.143 Standard for roadways.
61.144 Standard for manufacturing.
61.145 Standard for demolition and
renovation: Applicability.
61.146 Standard for demolition and
renovation: Notification requirements.
61.147 Standard for demolition and
renovation: Procedures for asbestos
emission control.
61.148 Standard for spraying.
61.149 Standard for fabricating.
61.150 Standard for insulating materials.
01.151 Standard for waste disposal for
asbestos mills.
61.152 Standard for waste disposal for
manufacturing, demolition, renovation,
spraying, and fabricating operations.
61.153 Standard for inactive waste disposal
si tea for asbestos mills and
manufacturing and fabricating
operations.
61.154 Air-cleaning.
81.155 Reporting..
61.156 Active waste disposal sites.
Authority: Sees. 112 and 301(a) of the Clean
Air Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 7412, 7601(a)),
and additional authority as noted below.
Subpart M—National Emission
Standard for Asbestos
§61.140 Applicability.
The provisions of this subpart are
applicable to those sources specified in
5§ 61.142 through 61.153.
§61.141 Definitions.
All terms that are used in this subpart
and are not defined below are given the
same meaning as in the Act and in
Subpart A of this part.
Active waste disposal site means any
disposal site other than an inactive site.
Adequately wetted means sufficiently
mixed or coated with water or an
aqueous solution to prevent dust
emissions.
Asbestos means the asbes'tiform
varieties of serpentinite (chrysotile),
riebeckite (crocidolite), cummingtonite-
grunerite, anthophyllite, and actinolite-
tremolite.
Asbestos-containing waste materials
means any waste that contains
commercial asbestos and is generated
by a source subject to the provisions of
this subpart. This term includes asbestos
mill tailings, asbestos waste from
control devices, friable asbestos waste
material, and bags or containers that
previously contained commercial
asbestos. However, as applied to
demolition and renovation operations,
this term includes only friable asbestos
waste and asbestos waste from control
devices.
Asbestos material means asbestos or
any material containing asbestos.
Asbestos mill means any facility
engaged in converting, or in any
intermediate step in converting,
asbestos ore into commercial asbestos.
Outside storage of asbestos material is
not considered a part of the asbestos
mill.
Asbestos tailings means any solid
waste that contains asbestos and is a
product of asbestos mining or milling
operations.
Asbestos waste from control devices
means any waste material that contains
asbestos and is collected in a pollution
control device.
Commercial asbestos means any
asbestos that is extracted from asbestos
ore.
Demolition means the wrecking or
taking out of any load-supporting
structural member of a facility together
with any related handling operations.
Emergency renovation operations
means a renovation operation that was
not planned but results from a sudden,
unexpected event. This term includes
operations necessitated by nonroutine
failures of equipment.
Fabricating means any processing of a
manufactured product that contains
commercial asbestos, with the exception
of processing at temporary sites for the
construction or restoration of facilities.
Facility means any institutional,
commercial, or industrial structure,
installation, or building (excluding
117
apartment buildings having no more
than four dwelling units).
Facility component means any pipe,
duct, boiler, tank, reactor, turbine, or
furnace at or in a facility; or any -
structural member of a facility.
Friable asbestos material means any
material containing more than 1 percent
asbestos by weight that hand pressure
can crumble, pulverize, or reduce to
powder when dry.
Inactive waste disposal site means
any disposal site or portion of it where
additional asbestos-containing waste
material will not be deposited and
where the surface is not disturbed by
vehicular traffic.
Manufacturing means the combining
of commercial asbestos—or, in the case
of woven friction products, the
combining of textiles containing
commercial asbestos—with any other
material(s), including commercial
asbestos, and the processing of this
combination into a product.
Outside air means the air outside
buildings and structures.
Particulate asbestos material means
finely divided particles of asbestos
material.
Planned renovation operations means
a renovation operation, or a number of
such operations, in which the amount of
friable asbestos material that will be
removed or stripped within a given
period of time can be predicted.
Individual nonscheduled operations are
included if a number of such operations
can be predicted to occur during a given
period of time based on operating
experience.
Remove means to take out friable
asbestos materials from any facility.
Renovation means altering in any way
one or more facility components.
Operations in which load-supporting
structural members are wrecked or
taken out are excluded.
Roadways means surfaces on which
motor vehicles travel. This term includes
highways, roads, streets, parking areas,
and driveways.
Strip means to take off friable
asbestos materials from any part of
facility.
Structural member means any load-
supporting member of a facility, such as
beams and loan supporting walls; or any
nonload-supporting member, such as
ceilings and nonload-supporting walls.
Visible emissions means any
emissions containing particulate
asbestos material that are visually
detectable without the aid of
instruments. This does not include
condensed uncombined water vapor.
-------
13662 Federal Register / Vol. 49. No. 67 / Thursday, April 5, 1984 / Rules and Regulations
5 61.142 Standard for aabesto* mill*.
Each owner or operator of an asbestos
mill shall either discharge no visible
emissions to the outside air from that
asbestos mill or use the methods
specified by § 61.154 to clean emissions
containing particulate asbestos material
before they escape to, or are vented to,
the outside air.
$61.143 Standard for roadway*.
No owner or operator of a roadway
may deposit asbestos tailings or
asbestos-containing waste material on
that roadway, unless it is a temporary
roadway on an area of asbestos ore
deposits.
§61.144 Standard for manufacturing.
(a) Applicability: This section applies
to the following manufacturing
operations using commercial asbestos.
(1) The manufacture of cloth, cord,
wicks, tubing, tape, twine, rope, thread,
yarn, roving, lap, or other textile
materials.
(2) The manufacture of cement
products.
(3) The manufacture of fireproofing
and insulating materials.
(4) The manufacture of friction
products.
(5) The manufacture of paper,
millboard, and felt.
(B) The manufacture of floor tile.
(7) The manufacture of paints,
coatings, caulks, adhesives, and
sealants.
(8) The manufacture of plastics and
rubber materials.
(9) The manufacture of chlorine.
(10) The manufacture of shotgun shell
wads.
(11) The manufacture of asphalt
concrete.
(b) Standard: Each owner or operator
of any of the manufacturing operations
to which this section applies shall either
(1) Discharge no visible emissions to
the outside air from these operations or
from any building .or structure in which
they are conducted; or
(2) Use the methods specified by
5 61.154 to clean emissions from these
operations containing particulate
asbestos material before they escape to,
or are vented to, the outside air.
§ 61.145 Standard for demolition and
renovation: Applicability.
The requirements of 85 61.146 and'
61.147 apply to each owner or operator
of a demolition or renovation operation
as follows:
(a) If the amount of friable asbestos
materials in a facility being demolished
is at least 80 linear meters (260 linear
feet) on pipes or at least 15 square
meters (180 square feet) on other facility
components, all the requirements of
55 61.146 and 61.147 apply, except as
provided in paragraph (c) of this section.
(b) If the amount of friable asbestos
materials in a facility being demolished
is less than 80 linear meters (260 linear
feet) on pipes and less than 15 square
meters (100 square feet) on other facility
components, only the notification
requirements of paragraphs (a), (b), and
(c) (1), (2), (3), (4), and (5) of J 61.146
apply.
(c) If the facility is being demolished
under an order of a State or local
governmental agency, issued because
the facility is structurally unsound and
in danger of imminent collapse, only the
requirements in 5 61.146 and in
paragraphs (d), (e), (f), and (g) of
I 61.147 apply.
(d) If at least 80 linear meters (260
linear feet) of friable asbestos materials
on pipes or at least 15 square meters
(160 square feet) of friable asbestos
materials on other facility components
are stripped or removed at a facility
being renovated, all the requirements of
15 61.146 and 61.147 apply.
(1) To determine whether paragraph
(d) of this section applies to planned
renovation operations involving
individual nonscheduled operations,
predict the additive amount of friable
asbestos materials to be removed or
stripped over the maximum period of
time a prediction can be made, not to
exceed 1 year.
(2) To determine whether paragraph
(d) of this section applies to emergency
renovation operations, estimate the
amount of friable asbestos materials to
be removed or stripped as a result of the
sudden, unexpected event that
necessitated the renovation.
(e) Owners or operators of demolition
and renovation operations are exempt
from the requirements of §5 61.05(a),
61.07, and 61.09.
§ 61.146 Standard for demolition and
renovation: Notification requirement*.
Each owner or operator to which this
section applies shall:
(a) Provide the Administrator with
written notice of intention to demolish
or renovate.
(b) Postmark or deliver the notice as
follows:
(1) At least 10 days before demolition
begins if the operation is described in
5 61.145(a);
(2) At least 20 days before demolition
begins if the operation is described in
5 61.145(b):
(3) As early as possible before
demolition begins if the operation is
described in 5 61.145(c);
(4) As early as possible before
renovation begins.
118
(c) Include the following information
in the notice:
(1) Name and address of owner or
operator.
(2) Description of the facility being
demolished or renovated, including the
size, age, and prior use of the facility.
(3) Estimate of the approximate
amount of friable asbestos material
present in the facility. For facilities
described in 5 61.145(b), explain
techniques of estimation.
(4) Location of the facility being
demolished or renovated.
(5) Scheduled starting and completion
dates of demolition or renovation.
(6) Nature of planned demolition or
renovation and method(s) to be used.
(7) Procedures to be used to comply
with the requirements of this Subpart.
(8) Name and location of the waste
disposal site where the friable asbestos
waste material will be deposited.
(9) For facilities described in
5 61.145(c), the name, title, and authority
of the State or local governmental
representative who has ordered the
demolition.
(Approved by the Office of Management and
Budget under control number 2000-0264)
§ 61.147 Standard for demolition and
renovation: Procedure* for asbecto*
emission control.
Each owner or operator to whom this
section applies shall comply with the
following procedures to prevent
emissions of particulate asbestos
material to the outside air:
(a),Remove friable asbestos materials
from a facility being demolished or
renovated before any wrecking or
dismantling that would break up the
materials or preclude access to the
materials for subsequent removal.
However, friable asbestos materials
need not be removed before demolition
if:
(1) They are on a facility component
that is encased in concrete or other
similar material; and
(2) These materials are adequately
weited whenever exposed during
demolition.
(b) When a facility component
covered or coated with friable asbestos
materials is being taken out of the
facility as units or in sections:
(1) Adequately wet any friable
asbestos materials exposed during
cutting or disjointing operations; and
(2) Carefully lower the units or
sections to ground level, not dropping
them or throwing them.
(c) Adequately wet friable asbestos
materials when they are being stripped
from facility components before the
members are removed from the facility.
-------
Federal Register / Vol. 49, No. 67 / Thursday, April 5, 1984 / Rules and Regulations
13663
In renovation operations, wetting that
would unavoidably damage equipment
is not required if the owner or operator:
(1) Asks the Administrator to
determine whether wetting to comply
with this paragraph would unavoidably
damage equipment, and, before
beginning to strip, supplies the
Administrator with adequate
information to make this determination;
and
(2) When the Administrator does
determine that equipment damage
would be unavoidable, uses a local
exhaust ventilation and collection
system designed and operated to
capture the particulate asbestos
material produced by the-stripping and
removal of the friable asbestos
materials. The system must exhibit no
visible emissions to the outside air or be
designed and operated in accordance
with the requirements in § 61.154.
(d) After a facility component has
been taken out of the facility as units or
in sections, either
(1) Adequately wet friable asbestos
materials during stripping; or
(2) Use a local exhaust ventilation and
collection system designed and operated
to capture the particulate asbestos
material produced by the stripping. The
system must exhibit no visible emissions
to the outside air or be designed and
operated in accordance with the
requirements in § 61.154.
(e) For friable asbestos materials that
have been removed or stripped:
(1) Adequately wet the materials to
ensure that they remain wet until they
are collected for disposal in accordance
with $ 61.152; and
(2) Carefully lower the materials to
the ground or a lower floor, not dropping
or throwing them; and
(3) Transport the materials to the
ground via dust-tight chutes or
containers if they have been removed or
stripped more than 50 feet above ground
level and were not removed as units or
in sections.
(f) When the temperature at the point
of wetting is below 0"C (32*F):
(1) Comply with the requirements of
paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section.
The owner or operator need not comply
with the other wetting requirements in
this section; and
(2) Remove facility components
coated or covered with friable asbestos
materials as units or in sections to the
maximum extent possible.
(g) For facilities described in
§ 61.145(c), adequately wet the portion
of the facility that contains friable
asbestos materials during the wrecking
operation.
§ 61.148 Standard for spraying.
The owner or operator of an operation
in which asbestos-containing materials
are spray applied shall comply with the
following requirements:
(a) Use materials that contain 1
percent asbestos or less on a dry weight
basis for spray-on application on
buildings, structures, pipes, and
conduits, except as provided in
paragraph (c) of this section.
(b) For spray-on application of
materials that contain more than 1
percent asbestos on a dry weight basis
on equipment and machinery, except as
provided in paragraph (c) of this section:
(1) Notify the Administrator at least
20 days before beginning the spraying
operation. Include the following
information in the notice:
(i) Name and address of owner or
operator.
(ii) Location of spraying operation.
(iii) Procedures to be followed to meet
the requirements of this paragraph.
(2) Discharge no visible emissions to
the outside air from the spray-on
application of the asbestos-containing
material or use the methods specified by
i 61.154 to clean emissions containing
particulate asbestos material before
they escape to, or are vented to, the
outside air.
(c) The requirements of paragraphs (a)
and (b) of this section do not apply to
the spray-on application of materials
where the asbestos fibers in the
materials are encapsulated with a
bituminous or resinous binder during
spraying and the materials are not
friable after drying.
(d) Owners and operators of sources
subject to this section are exempt from
the requirements of §§ 61.05(a), 81.07.
and 61.09.
(Approved by the Office of Management and
Budget under control number 2000-0284)
§ 61.149 Standard for fabricating.
(a) Applicability. This section applies
to the following fabricating operations
using commercial asbestos:
(1) The fabrication of cement building
products.
(2) The fabrication of friction
products, except those operations that
primarily install asbestos friction
materials on motor vehicles.
(3) The fabrication of cement or
silicate board for ventilation hoods;
ovens; electrical panels; laboratory
furniture, bulkheads, partitions, and
ceilings for marine construction; and
flow control devices for the molten
metal industry,
(b) Standard. Each owner or operator
of any of the fabricating operations to
which this section applies shall either
119
(1) Discharge no visible emissions to
the outside air from any of the
operations or from any building or
structure in which they are conducted;
or
(2) Use the methods specified by
§ 61.154 to clean emissions containing
particulate asbestos material before
they escape to, or are vented to, the
outside air.
$61.150 Standard for Inaulatlng material*.
After the effective date of this
regulation, no owner or operator of a
facility may install or reinstall on a
facility component any insulating
materials that contain commercial
asbestos if the materials are either
molded and friable or wet-applied and
friable after drying. The provisions of
this paragraph do not apply to spray-
applied insulating materials regulated
under \ 61.148.
§ 61.151 Standard for watte disposal for
asbestos mills.
Each owner or operator of any source
covered under the provisions of § 61.142
shall:
[a] Deposit all asbestos-containing
waste material at waste disposal sites
operated in accordance with the
provisions of § 61.156; and
(b) Discharge no visible emissions to
the outside air from the transfer of
asbestos waste from control devices to
the tailings conveyor, or use the
methods specified by $ 61.154 to clean
emissions containing particulate
asbestos material before they escape to,
or are vented to, the outside air. Dispose
of the asbestos waste from control
devices in accordance with $ 61.152(b)
or paragraph (c) of this section; and
(c) Discharge no visible emissions to
the outside air during the collection,
processing, packaging, transporting, or
deposition of any asbestos-containing
waste material, or use one of the
disposal methods specified in
paragraphs (c) (I) or (2) of this section,
as follows:
(1) Use a wetting agent as follows:
(i) Adequately mix all asbestos-
containing waste material with a
wetting agent recommended by the
manufacturer of the agent to effectively
wet dust and tailings, before depositing
the material at a waste disposal site.
Use the agent as recommended for the
particular dust by the manufacturer of
the agent.
(ii) Discharge no visible emissions to
the outside air from the wetting
operation or use the methods specified
by § 61.154 to clean emissions
containing particulate asbestos material
-------
13664
Federal Register / Vol. 49, No. 67 / Thursday, April 5, 1984 / Rules and Regulations
before they escape to, or are vented to,
the outside air.
(iii) Wetting may be suspended when
the ambient temperature at the waste
disposal site is less than — 9.5'C (15*F).
Determine the ambient air temperature
by an appropriate measurement method
with an accuracy of ±1*C(±2'F), and
record it at least hourly while the
wetting operation is suspended. Keep
the records for at least 2 years in a form
suitable for inspection.
(2) Use an alternative disposal method
that has received prior approval by the
Administrator.
§ 91.152 Standard for rate disposal for
manufacturing demolition, renovation,
•praying, and fabricating operation*.
Each owner or operator of any source
covered under the provisions of
§5 61.144-61.149 shall:
(a) Deposit all asbestos-containing
waste material at waste disposal sites
operated in accordance with the
provisions of 9 61.156; and
(b) Discharge no visible emissions to
the outside air during the collection,
processing (including incineration),
packaging, transporting, or deposition of
any asbestos-containing waste material
generated by the source, or use one of
the disposal methods specified in
paragraphs (b)(l). (2). or (3) of this
section, as follows:
(1) Treat asbestos-containing waste
material with water
(i) Mix asbestos waste from control
devices with water to form a slurry,
adequately wet other asbestos-
containing waste material; and
(ii) Discharge no visible emissions to
the outside air from collection, mixing,
and wetting operations, or use the
methods specified by i 61.154 to clean
emissions containing particulate
asbestos material before they escape to,
or are vented to, the outside air, and
(iii) After wetting, seal all asbestos-
containing waste material in leak-tight
containers while wet; and
(iv) Label the containers specified in
paragraph (b)(l)(iii) as follows:
CAUTION
Contains Asbestos-
Avoid Opening or
Breaking Container
Breathing Asbestos is hazardous
to Your Health
Alternatively, use warning labels
specified by Occupational Safety and
Health Standards of the Department of
Labor, Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA) under 29 CFR
(2) Process asbestos-containing waste
material into nonfriable forms:
(i) Form all asbestos-containing waste
material into nonfriable pellets or other
shapes; and
(ii) Discharge no visible emissions to
the outside air from collection and
processing operations, or use the
methods specified by f 81.154 to clean
emissions containing particulate
asbestos material before they escape to,
or are vented to, the outside air.
(3) Use an alternative disposal method
that has received prior approval by the
Administrator.
{61.153 Standard for Inactive waste
disposal sites for asbestos mills and
manufacturing and fabricating operations.
Each owner or operator of any
inactive waste disposal site that was
operated by sources covered under
55 61.142,61.144, or 61.149 and received
deposits of asbestos-containing waste
material generated by the sources, shall
(a) Comply with one of the following:
(1) Either discharge no visible
emissions to the outside air from an
inactive waste disposal site subject to
this paragraph; or
(2) Cover the asbestos-containing
waste material with at least 15
centimeters (6 inches) of compacted
nonasbestos-containing material, and
grow and maintain a cover of vegetation
on the area adequate to prevent
exposure of the asbestos-containing
waste material; or
(3) Cover the asbestos-containing
waste material with at least 60
centimeters (2 feet) of compacted
nonasbestos-containing material, and
maintain it to prevent exposure of the
asbestos-containing waste; or
(4) For inactive waste disposal sites
for asbestos tailings, apply a resinous or
petroleum-based dust suppression agent
that effectively binds dust and controls
wind erosion. Use the agent as
recommended for the particular
asbestos tailings by the manufacturer of
the dust suppression agent. Obtain prior
approval of the Administrator to use
other equally effective dust suppression
agents. For purposes of this paragraph,
waste crankcase oil is not considered a
dust suppression agent.
(b) Unless a natural barrier
adequately deters access by the general
public, install and maintain warning
signs and fencing as follows, or comply
with paragraph (a)(2) or (a)(3) of this
section.
(1) Display warning signs at all
entrances and at intervals of 100 m (330
feet) or less along the property line of
the site or along the perimeter of the
sections of the site where asbestos-
containing waste material was
deposited. The warning signs must:
120
(i) Be posted in such a manner and
location that a person can easily read
the legend; and
(ii) Conform to the requirements for 51
cmX36 cm (20"X14") upright format
signs specified in 29 CFR 1910.145(d)(4)
and this paragraph; and
(iii) Display the following legend in
the lower panel with letter sizes and
styles of a visibility at least equal to
those specified in this paragraph.
Legend
ArfMsto* WMU DtopoMl Su .
Do Not Cr«*U OuM
Breathing Aib««toi 1* Haz-
ardous to Your Health.
Notahen
2.5 cm (1 inch) Sana Serif,
Gothic or Block
1.S cm (* men) Sana Sent,
Gothe or Stock
14 PoM Gothic.
Spacing between any two lines must be
at least equal to the height of the upper
of the two lines.
(2) Fence the perimeter of the site in a
manner adequate to deter access by the
general public.
(3) Upon request and supply of
appropriate information, the
Administrator will determine whether a
fence or a natural barrier adequately
deters access by the general public.
(c) The owner or operator may use an
alternative control method that has
received prior approval of the
Administrator radier than comply with
the requirements of paragraph (a) or (b)
of this section.
§61.154 Air-cleaning.
(a) The owner or operator who elects
to use air-cleaning, as permitted by
§5 61.142, 61.144. 61.147(c)(2).
61.147(d)(2), 61.148(b)(2), 61.149(b),
61.152(b)(l)(ii). andei.l52(b)(2) shall
(1) Use fabric filter collection devices,
except as noted in paragraph (b) of this
section, doing all of the following:
(i) Operating the fabric filter
collection devices at a pressure drop of
no more than 4 inches water gage, as
measured across the filter fabric; and
(ii) Ensuring that the airflow
permeability, as determined by ASTM
Method D737-75, does not exceed 9 m*/
min/m» (30 ft»/min7fta) for woven
fabrics or lls/min/ma(35 fts/min/fta)
for felted fabrics, except that 12 m»/
min/ma (40 ft'min/ft1) for woven and 14
ma/min/ma (45 ft smin/fta) for felted
fabrics is allowed for filtering air from
asbestos ore dryers; and
(iii) Ensuring that felted fabric weighs
at least 475 grams per square meter (14
ounces per square yard) and is at least
1.8 millimeters (one-sixteenth inch) thick
throughout; and
-------
Federal Register / Vol. 49, No. 67 / Thursday. April 5. 1984 / Rules and Regulations 13665
(iv) Avoiding the use of synthetic
fabrics that contain fill yarn other than
that which is spun.
(2) Properly install, use, operate, and
maintain ali air-cleaning equipment
authorized by this section. Bypass
devices may be used only during upset
or emergency conditions and then only
for so long as it takes to shut down the
operation generating the particulate
asbestos material.
(b) There are the following exceptions
to paragraph (a)(l):
(1) If the use of fabric creates a fire or
explosion hazard, the Administrator
may authorize as a substitute the use of
wet collectors designed to operate with
a unit contacting energy of at least 9.95
kilopascals (40 inches water gage
pressure).
(2) The Administrator may authorize
the use of filtering equipment other than
that described in paragraphs (a)(l) and
(b)(l) of this section if the owner or
operator demonstrates to the
Administrator's satisfaction that it is
equivalent to the described equipment in
filtering particulate asbestos material.
§61.155 Reporting.
(a) Within 90 days after the effective
date of this subpart, each owner or
operator of any existing source to which
this subpart applies shall provide the
following information to the
Administrator, except that any owner or
operator who provided this information
prior to April 5,1984 in order to comply
with 5 61.24 (which this section
replaces) is not required to resubmit it.
(1) A description of the emission
control equipment used for each
process; and
(2) If a fabric filter device is used to
control emissions, the pressure drop
across the fabric filter in inches water
gage; and
(i) If the fabric device uses a woven
fabric, the airflow permeability in m3/
min/m2 and; if the fabric is synthetic,
whether the fill yarn is spun or not spun;
and
(ii) If the fabric filter device uses a
felted fabric, the density in g/m2, the
minimum thickness in inches, and the
airflow permeability in ms/min/m*.
(3) For sources subject to §| 61.151
and 61.152:
(i) A brief description of each process
that generates asbestos-containing
waste material; and
(ii) The average weight of asbestos-
containing waste material disposed of,
measured in kg/day; and
(iii) The emission control methods
used in all stages of water disposal; and
(iv) The type of disposal site or
incineration site used for ultimate
disposal, the name of the site operator,
and the name and location of the
disposal site.
(4) For sources subject to } 61.153:
(i) A brief description of the site; and
(ii) The method or methods used to
comply with the standard, or alternative
procedures to be used.
(b) The information required by
paragraph (a) of this section must
accompany the information required by
§ 61.10. The information described in
this section must be reported using the
format of Appendix A of this part.
(Sec. 114. Clean Air Act at amended (42
U.S.C. 7414)).
(Approved by this Office of Management and
Budget under control number 2000-0264)
§61.15« Active w«*t« disposal site*.
To be an acceptable site for disposal
of asbestos-containing waste material
under § § 61.151 and 61.152, an active
waste disposal site must meet the
requirements of this section.
(a) Either there must be no visible
emissions to the outside air from any
active waste disposal site where
asbestos-containing waste material has
been deposited, or the requirements of
paragraph (c) or (d) of this section must
be met.
(b) Unless a natural barrier
adequately deters access by the general
public, either warning signs and fencing
must be installed and maintained as
follows, or the requirements of
paragraph (c)(l) of this section must be
met.
(1) Warning signs must be displayed
at all entrances and at intervals of 100 m
(330 ft) or less along the property line of
the site or along the perimeter of the
sections of the site where asbestos-
containing waste material is deposited.
The warning signs must:
(i) Be posted in such a manner and
location that a person can easily read
the legend; and
(ii) Conform to the requirements of 51
cm x 36 cm (20" X 14") upright format
signs specified in 29 CFR 1910.145{d)(4)
and this paragraph; and
(iii) Display the following legend in
the lower panel with letter sizes and
styles of a visibility at least equal to
those specified in this paragraph.
legend
Atbmto* Wist* DnpoMl
S /our H*attft.
Notation
2.5 cm (1 inch) Sana Sent.
Gothic or Block.
1 9 cm (* inch) Sana Sam,
GotNc or Block.
14 Ponl GotNc.
Spacing between any two lines must be
at least equal to the height of the upper
of the two lines.
(2) The perimeter of the disposal site
must be fenced in a manner adequate to
deter access by the general public.
(3) Upon request and supply of
appropriate information, the
Administrator will determine whether a
fence or a natural barrier adequately
deters access by the general public.
(c) Rather than meet the no visible
emission requirement of paragraph (a) of
this section, an active waste disposal
site would be an acceptable site if at the
end of each operating day, or at least
'once every 24-hour period while the site
is in continuous operation, the asbestos-
containing waste material which was
deposited at the site during the
operating day or previous 24-hour period
is covered with either.
(1) At least 15 centimeters (6 inches)
of compacted nonasbestos-containing
material, or
(2) A resinous or petroleum-based
dust suppression agent that effectively
binds dust and controls wind erosion.
This agent must be used as
recommended for the particular dust by
the manufacturer of the dust
suppression agent. Other equally
effective dust suppression agents may
be used upon prior approval by the
Administrator. For purposes of this
paragraph, waste crankcase oil is not
considered a dust suppression agent.
(d) Rather than meet the no visible
emission requirement of paragraph (a) cf
this section, an active waste disposal
site would be an acceptable site if an
alternative control method for emissions
that has received prior approval by the
Administrator is used.
(Sees. 112 and 301(a) of the Clean Air Act as
amended (42 U.S.C. 7412, 7601(a))
|FR Doc M-MM Filed 4-4-M: 8:45 am]
BILLmO COM U40-M-M
121
-------
APPENDIX B
ASBESTOS SOURCES
FIELD DATA COLLECTION CHECKLISTS
1. Demolition and Renovation Site Inspections
2. Landfill Site Inspections
122
-------
DEMOLITION AND RENOVATION
FIELD DATA COLLECTION CHECKLIST
I. BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Site location (Address):
Date and time of inspection:
Weather conditions:
(ambient temperature)
Name of Inspector:
Site owner or operator:
Name:
Address:
Phone:
Prime contractor or
subcontractor:
Name:
Address:
Phone:
Site contact:
Name:
Affiliation:
Title:
Notification given: Yes No If no, why
II. BUILDING/STRUCTURE INFORMATION
Use (office, retail, industry):
Type of Construction:
Size (number floors, square footage):
Age - Constructed:
Renovated:
Surrounding neighborhood:
Operating schedule:
(if in use)
III. ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION
Demolition: , Renovation, , Condemned
Present status:
123
-------
If phased renovation
record schedule:
If activity has not begun, obtain work schedule for asbestos removal
(return at that time).
IV. LOCATION OF FRIABLE MATERIAL
(Document with photographs)
Record location in building (Blueprints or sketch)
Is suspect material exposed or concealed?
Is suspect material friable?
Estimate amount: more than 260 ft
more than 160 ft2
Sample as necessary.
V. REMOVAL PROCEDURES IMPLEMENTED
(Record violations if observed and take samples)
Wetting and stripping -
Unit or section removal -
Use of surfactant -
Water availability -
Local exhaust ventilation/
collection system
(no visible emissions or
air-cleaning) -
Use of barriers -
Other removal technique or procedures -
VI. WASTE HANDLING
(Record violations if observed and take samples)
Wetting waste: Yes No
Record waste
transport throughout
site (including containers)
124
-------
LANDFILL FIELD DATA COLLECTION CHECKLIST
SITE NAME:
Address:
Date and time:
Weather Conditions:
Investigator:
Site Contact: Name:
Title:
Affiliation:
Phone:
Confidentiality Claim Asserted: Yes No
Permission to take photographs on site: Yes No
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
Operating Schedule:
hr/d d/wk wk/yr d/yr
Scheduled shutdowns:
Permitted Site:
Yes No , if yes then permit number and effective dates_
125
-------
Permitted by:
Requirements to obtain permit(s):
SITE DESCRIPTION:
Years of operation , expected life span
Surrounding land use:*
(*Note North, South, East, and West Orientations)
Type of landfill (area, slope/ramp, trench, pit/quarry) -
Run-on/Run-off control measures -
Wind erosion control measures -
SITE CONTACT INTERVIEW - ASBESTOS WASTE HANDLING:
When was asbestos-containing waste last received?
Type of waste and generator?
How was it deposited (e.g. manually off-loaded, dumped semi-
automatically)?
How was it containerized?
Where was it actually deposited? (note on sketch)
Over the previous two months, how many asbestos-containing waste
shipments have been received?
Where has the material been deposited?
126
-------
VISUAL OBSERVATIONS:
Waste sufficiently covered? (depth of cover material)
Type of cover material?
Is a dust suppressant agent used? Type?
Signs or fences present?
Accessible to public (natural barriers)?
Special handling procedures for asbestos?
Any inactive (closed) portions?
Is any asbestos-containing waste exposed?
If the material is exposed
Was it deposited with the past 24 hours?
Is it sealed in leak-tight containers
and are the containers intact?
Are the containers properly labeled?
Are visible emissions present?
SAMPLING (repeat for each sample taken);
Sample identification number(s) -
Sample location(s) -
Visible emissions present?
(*Note: take photographs)
FOR INACTIVE SITES OR PORTIONS THEREOF:
Are visible emissions present?
Are warning signs posted?
Does a fence or natural barrier surround the site? or
Has the asbestos-containing waste been covered by six inches of material
and does a vegetative cover exist? or
Has the asbestos-containing waste been covered by two feet of compacted
non-asbestos containing material?
127
-------
SKETCH OF DISPOSAL SITE (PLAN VIEW)
(Include Site Entrance and Boundaries, Roadways, Active Cells, Closed Cells,
Borrow Areas, Direction of Prevailing Wind, Location of Deposited Asbestos-Containing Waste)
K>
00
-------
APPENDIX C
ASBESTOS
NESHAPs APPLICABILITY DETERMINATIONS
129
-------
NESHAPS APPLICABILITY DETERMINATIONS—ASBESTOS
Code*
Date of.
Response
Question
Affected
Regulation
Determi-
nation
Discussion
u-1 4/26/73
Are talo milling
operations con-
sidered asbestos
wills?
Co
o
$61.22(a) No The proposed regulation included
a definition of Asbestos mill,
meaning facilities engaged in con-
version of asbestos ore into com-
mercial asbestos thereby excluding
talo milling which does not con-
vert asbestos ore to commercial
asbestos. This definition was
inadvertently left out of the
final regulation. We are taking
steps to have this corrected in
the regulations. In the meantime
it la our position that asbestos
mills do not include talc milling
Update r The definition was pro-
mulgated in the Federal Register
on May 3, 1974, 51^1721^An
asbestos mill roust convert asbes-
tos ore into Commercial asbestos.
*B-2 5/25/73
Is the maintenance
of boilers and pipes
subject to the asbes-
tos standard for
demolition operations?
561.22(d) No Maintenance, including disassemb-
ling or replacing of boilers and.
pipes is not considered deroolltlo
and, therefore, is not subject to
61.22(d). Demolition roust
include wrecking or removal of
structural members.
*D-i3 5/25/73
Is the mixing of an
asbestos compound that
is used to coat a
steel pipe for purposes
of heat treating
covered?
§61.22(o) Y«s This ia the manufacturing of an
insulating material 6l,22(c)(3).
-------
NESHAPS APPLICABILITY DETERMINATIONS—ASBESTOS
(continued)
'Code
Date of.
Response
Question
Affected
Regulation
Peterml"
nation
Discussion
*B-4 5/25/73
Is the spraying of
insulation contain-
ing asbestos onto
cable covered?
S61.22(e) Yes It ia covered since cable is
equipment and there must be no
visible emissions to the outside
air 1C the insulation contains
greater tha.n 1% asbestos.
•D-5 5/25/73
Is the manufacturing
of asbestos paper and
Celt filters covered?
S61.22(c) (5) No
The regulation is applicable to
the manufacturing of felt and
paper only, not felt and paper
products.
*D-6 5/25/73
If one purchases felt
containing asbestos
and cuts it for pur-
poses of making
roofing, is this opera-
tion covered?
$61.22(o)(5) No
As explained earlier, this ia
fabrication.
•D-6.5 5/25/73
Is the manufacturing
of asbestos gaskets
covered?
$61.22(a) Yes It is the manufacturing of a
sealant, 61.22(o)(7).
*B-7 5/25/73
If asbestos emissions
are visible only bo-
cause of the presence
of another pollutant,
is a source out of
compliance?
S61.22(a)(c)»
(a)
It la out of compliance if the
level of asbestos in the emission
stream is above that which would
be found in the background level
of the atmosphere. It is neces-
sary in all cases to take a sampli
of the gas stream to determine tin
presence of asbestos. Since
background levels of asbestos are
difficult if not Impossible to
determine, a gas stream sample
must be done in order to show
compliance.
-------
NESHAPS APPLICABILITY DETERMINATIONS—ASBESTOS
(continued)
Code
Date ol|
Response
Question
Affected
Regulation
Determi-
nation
Discussion
*B-B 5/25/73
7/6/73
Is the cutting of
asbestos paper
covered?
S61.22(a)(5) Yes
S61.22(otMo~~
It is covered if it involves
cutting of paper prior to initial
marketing.
It is not covered if it Involves
cutting of paper that lias been
initially marketed. This would
be fabrication not manufacturing.
to
*D-9 5/25/73 If one purchases an
revised asbestos board, which
7/6/73 is an Insulating or
flreprooflng product,
and then outs it, is
this source subject
to the asbestos
; standard Cor manu-
facturing of fire-
proofing and insula-
ting materials?
B-10 5/26/73
Must demolition con-
tractors report at
least 20 days in ad-
vance of a demolition
operation?
$61,22(o)(3) Ho
S61.a2(d)(l)
This is ponsidered a fabrication
operation. The regulation
applies to manufacturing opera-
tions (i.e./ the mixing of com-
mercial asbestos with other
materials and the processing of
this mixture into a marketable
product which is sold to a dis-
tributor or at retail if no dis-
tribution la involved). Any pro-
cessing after initial marketing is
considered fabrication. However,
there IB one exception to the
rule. This includes manufacturing
of woven friction products which
can Involve the processing of
asbestos textiles purchaser' from
another source,
Revised October 14, 1975, at
S61.22(d)(2) requiring written
notice 10 days prior to commence-
ment of demolition.
-------
NESHAPS APPLICABILITY DETERMINATIONS—ASBESTOS
(continued)
Coda
Date o{
Response
Question
Affected
Regulation
09 termi-
nation
Discussion
D-ll 6/12/73
Are concrete and ce-
ment manufacturing
operations which have
naturally occurring
asbestos entrained
In the Ingredients
covered?
Co
§61.22(o) No The regulations did not Intend to
coyer this situation. The regu-
lations were intended to apply
only when commercial asbestos is•
used in the manufacturing process.
The regulation will need to be
amended to clarify this situation.
In the meAntime, it is our posi-
tion that only manufacturing of
cement products which invlove the J
addition of commercial asbestos la*
covered by 61.22(c)(2).
Update - Revision promulgated on i
May 3, 1974 at §61.2100 and (1) .
defined commercial asbestos as ;
asbestos extracted from asbestos
ore. Manufacturing is defined j
as using commercial asbestos. i
B-12 6/13/73
Are manufacturing
operations using
talc covered?
S61.22(o) No Talc is not commercial asbestos
and only manufacturing involving
commercial asbestos is covered by
61.22(c). Revision promulgated
on May 3( 1974 at S61.21(h) t (i)
defined commercial asbestos and
manufacturing (see U-ll above),
•D-13 6/22/73
If a resin contain-
ing commercial asbes-
tos is purchased and
further processed, is
this operation covered?
S61.22(o)(B) No
This is A fabrication operation,
-------
NESHAPS APPLICABILITY DETERMINATIONS—ASBESTOS
(continued)
Code '
Date of
Response
Question
Affected
Regulation
Determl'
nation
Discussion
*B-14 6/22/73
*B-15 6/22/73
to
U-15.5 0/8/73
la the spray-on appli-
cation of asbestos con-
taining materials used
for the purpose of
decoration or of pro-
viding a chemical
resistant surface
subject to the regu-
lations?
Is the manufacturing
of fireprooflng and
insulating materials
covered if vermiculite
containing naturally
occurring asbestos is
an ingredient?
§61.22(e)
No The regulation applies only to the
spraying of asbestos .for purposes
of insulating and fireprooflng.
However, the manufacturing of
these materials is regulated by
61.22(c)(7), the manufacturing of
a coating. Ml spraying applica-
tions containing over It asbes-
tos will be covered by upcoming
revisions, to the regulations.
S61.22(o)<3) No
Do demolition and
renovation regulations
apply to ships in dry
dock?
The regulations were intended only
for manufacturing of fireproofing •
and insulating materials where
commercial asbestos is added.
Therefore, it la. our position
that thla operation la not covered
by the regulation. An amendment
to the regulation will be needed
to clarify this.
Update - Revised on Hay 3, 1974
at §61.21(10 and (i)
(See B-jl above)
Ves See n-17.
Since that determination the
definition of "demolition" and
"structural member" have been
clarified by revisions on
October 14, 1975, and March 2,
1977.
-------
NESHAPS APPLICABILITY DETERMINATIONS—ASBESTOS
(continued)
Code '
Date of.
Response
Question
Affected
Regulation
Deterrai~
nation
Discussion
*B-16 8/8/73
Is the spraying of
asbestos containing
materials used for
insulating or fire-
proofing buildings,
structures, pipes and
conduits, if the pollu-
tant would not be
expelled to the out-
side atmosphere^covered
under NESIIAPS?
S61,22(e) Yes Although asbestos is not directly
emitted to the air from these
operations, there is a potential
emission with future demolition.
It was decided to cover these
operations to reduce this poten-
tial.
B-17 8/8/73
Ln
Are drydock operations
involving ship refurb-
ishment subject to the
asbestos regulations?
$61.22(4)
These operations are subject if
they involve the wrecking of load
supporting structural members.
Operations involving only refurb-
ishment of boiler and pipes are
not subject.
Update - Revised October 14, 1975
at §61.21(j), defining demolition
as wrecking or taking out of any
load supporting structural member
or related stripping or removing
of asbestos materials.
Revised March 2, 1977 - all
structural members are subject to
the regulations.
I
*B-18 8/8/73
A manufacturer has two S61.22
plants. Plant A pro-
duces asbestos paper
which is shipped to
Plant U. Plant B makes
roofing tile from the
asbestos paper and treats
it with an asphalt mix. Is
Plant I) covered by the
standard?
No Standard covers the manufacturing
of asbestos paper but does not
cover fabrication of asbestos
paper products.
i
-------
NESHAPS APPLICABILITY DETERMINATIONS—ASBESTOS
(continued)
Code
Date ot|
Keaponae
Question
Affected
Regulation
Dotermi-
nation
Discussion
*B-19 10/23/73
Are the emissions of
asbestos from the
manufacturing of as-
phalt coating (not
asphalt paving but
coatings for asphalt
paving) applicable
to the regulation?
S6i.22(c)<7) Yes
It IB the manufacturing of a
coating 6i.22(o)(7).
*B-20 10/23/73
Does NGSIIAPS apply to
the salvaging of pipes
with asbestos covering?
S61.22(d) Yes Procedures detailed in S61.22(d)
(2) must be followed, i.e., pipes
must be wetted and removed prior
to demolition of load-supporting
structural members. However,
wetting ia only required where
the asbestos insulation must be
stripped to remove the pipes
(e.g. pipe joints.) If insulation
on the pipa remains undisturbed
it will not create an emission
^ problem.
D-21 3/26/74
If emissions containing
asbestos are visible
only because of the
presence of steam, is
a source out of com-
pliance?
S61.22(a)
-------
Code
Date of,
Response
NESHAPS APPLICABILITY DETERMINATIONS—ASBESTOS
(continued)
Question
Affected
Regulation
Determi-
nation
Discussion
B-22 4/2/74
When commercial as-
bestos is added to
previously mixed con-
crete at the con-
struction site, is
this considered manu-
facturing of cement
prodyctp under NE3IIAP8?
S61.22(o)(2) Yes
See definition of Manufacturing
$61.21(1).
B-2J 7/1/74
Co
Can asbestos tailings
be used on roadways
wherei (a) such
material is used in
bituminous mixes t
covered with asphalt
fc sand, (b) such
material is used in
liquid seals fc covered
with asphalt & sand
or (a) such material
is used in bases and
covered with sand fc
gravels?
S61.22(b) No Surfacing of roadways with asbes-
tos tailings is prohibited under '
all circumstances except for
temporary roads located on an area
of asbestos ore deposits.
B-24 7/11/74
Does the manufacturing
standard apply only to
sources using com-
mercial asbestos &
not to those receiving
asbestos as lap, roving
yarn, mat, or some such
form?
S61.22(o) Yes In the case of woven friction pro-
except ducts, where the operation
begins with textiles containing
commercial asbestos. Regulations
for some fabrication operations
will be proposed soon.
Update - Revisions were promul-
gated 10/14/75, at $61.22
-------
NESHAPS APPLICABILITY DETERMINATIONS—ASBESTOS
(continued)
Code ' Date of,
Response
Question
Affected
Regulation
De termi-
nation
Discussion
B-25 10/1/74
Can asbestos tailings
be used for purpose of
snow fc ice control on
driveways t parking
lots?
S61.22(b) No Driveways and parking lots are
considered roadways under
61.22(b).
Update - Regulations were revised
October 14. 1975 to reflect this
determination at S61.21(v).
D-26 1/24/75
Are visible emissions
from asbestos block
ourlng ovens subject
to NESIIAP regulations?
S61.22(a) No Visible emissions from these
sources are caused by resins
(hydrocarbons) and not by asbeat;oa
•B-27 4/7/75
00
Are asbestos mine
tailings allowed for
use in base materials
for roadways?
S61,22(b) tlo Use of asbestos mine tailings in
bituminous mixes, liquid seals
or bases covered with sand or
gravel is prohibited in the
regulations.
*B-28 4/7/75
Are asbestos tailings
allowed for use in
concrete roadways?
S61.22(b) No Use of asbestos tailings are not
allowed in concrete roadway
construction.
*n-*29 4/7/75
Are asbestos tailings
allowed for use as
backfill?
Yes Use of asbestos tailings as a
backfill is not covered by the
regulations.
*D-30 6/13/75
Are asbestos mill
tailings allowed for
use in roadbed con-
struction?
S61.22(b)
Ho
Use of asbestos mill tailings in j
roadway construction is prohibited
•IH31 6/26/75
Is an asbestos tex-
tile, plant subject
to the NESIIAP
regulations?
S61.22(o)(U
Construction, of 12 textile
winders approved, subject to
40 CPU 61.
-------
NESHAPS APPLICABILITY DETERMINATIONS—ASBESTOS
(continued)
Code
Date of
Response
Question
Affected
Regulation
Determi-
nation
Discussion
B-32 10/19/75
Is the demolition of an
industrial building
which contains no fria-
ble asbestos material
except a chemical re-
actor vessel which is
insulated with friable
asbestos material
covered by NES1IAPB?
S61.22(d) Yes Revised October 14, 1975, at
S6l.22(d)( to apply to pipes,
ducts, boilers, tanks, reactors
turbines, furnaces, or structural
members.
•B-33 11/10/75
Co
Is the manufacturing
of asphalt paving to
which commercial
asbestos la added
covered?
S61.22(o)
It is the Administrator's judg-
ment that the manufacture of
asphalt concrete is a major source
of asbestos emissions, therefore
regulations limiting emissions
from the manufacture of asphalt
concrete were promulgated in the
Federal Register on 10/14/75, at
$61.22(0(11). |
•B-34 5/6/76
Are asbestos mine
tailings used in
asphalt mix subject
to the NESIIAP regu-
lations?
S61.22(b) Yes Use of asbestos tailings in an I
asphalt mix to be •'installed over j
the undercoat" of an asphalt aur- j
faced road is considered a road- !
way application which is prohi- j
bited by the regulations. •
*D-35 4/25/77
What.is an acceptable
method for identifying
asbestos samples
found in demolition/
renovation inspections?
microscopy
EPA has relied on polarized mi-
croscopy in most enforcement
cases. This method is used for
identification of hard samples
of asbestos as are found at
demolition and renovation sites,
as well as waste disposal sites.
-------
NESHAPS APPLICABILITY DETERMINATIONS—ASBESTOS
(continued)
Code . Date o^
. Response
Qnastion
Affooted
Regulation
Determi-
nation
Discussion
H-36 5/9/77
Do demolition and
renovation regula-
tions apply to ships
tied up at a dock?
§61.22(d) Yes It the aliip is undergoing any
operation involving wreckage or
removal of structural members
which contain asbestos material,
the operation must be in oom«
pliance with the regulations.
B-37 5/9/77
Is the ship owner or
dock owner responsible
for compliance with
demol11 ion/renova tion
regulations?
S61.22(d)
The owner of the dock is respon-
sible for compliance with the
NBSHAP regulations if ha is also
the owner/operator of the demoli-
tion or renovation operation.
the ship owner is always respon-
sible for compliance in each
situation.
-------
NESHAPS APPLICABILITY DETERMINATIONS—ASBESTOS
(continued)
Code
' Date of,
Response
Question
Affected
Regulation
Determi-
nation
Discussion
B -38 10/7/77
Can the fencing re-
quirement in $61.25(a)
be satisfied by placing
a fence along the pro-
perty line of a plant
containing an asbestos
disposal site rather
than around the peri-
meter of the disposal
site Itself?
§6l.25(a)
Yes This question was resolved in '
40 gad. Reg. 48294, October 14,
1975 as a response to a com-
ment on the amendments proposed
October 25, 1974. A fence
surrounding a plant property
which adequately deters public
access may substitute for a
fence around the perimeter of
a disposal site located within •
__ the property fence.
D -39 11/3/77
Does the 1% limit on
asbestos content of
spray on materials
apply to naturally-
occurring as well as
commercially added
asbestos?
S61.22(o)
Yes
The 1% limit on spraying of J
asbestos-containing materials
in g61.22(e) does not specify
commercial asbestos. There-
fore the limitation la applic- I
able to naturally-occurring •
as well as commercial asbestos.'
D -40 2/9/78
fs a wallboard manu-
facturing facility
which uses as filler
material, tailing fines
from an asbestos mine,
subject to S61.22(c)7
Is it subject to any
other section of the
asbestos regulations?
S61,22(o)
No
Section 61.22(c) applies to i
manufacturing operations who |
use commercial asbestos. Since
tailing fines do not fall into {
the category "commercial as- |
bestos" as defined in §&1.21(h),
the operation is not subject to
$61.22(c). Since the source of. .
the tailing fines is a mine, i'
the use of the tailings"~In the
wallboar4 manufacturing pro-
cess ia not covered by any
section under Subpart fl. How-
ever, were the source of the
tailing fines an asbestos mill, any
operations involving the collection,
processing, packaging, transporting,
or deposition of the tailing fines
would ba subject to the requirements
e t« i I ... r \ it ll < 'i \
-------
NESHAPS APPLICABILITY DETERMINATIONS—ASBESTOS
(continued)
Code
Question
Affected
Regs
Determ.
Discussion
B-41 In reference to the
6/29/79 asbestos regulations,
are subject inactive
waste disposal sites
prevented or restricted
from future use as
commercial or
residential sites?
61.22U)
Condi- Inactive disposal sites may be
tional used for commercial or residential
develo[>ment provided that exposure
of the asbestos is avoided in
accordance with £61.22(e).
D-42 May the sub-base
9/10/79 layers of road-
ways be paved with
asphalt that contains
H asbestos tailings?
61.22(b)
61.25
Condi- The prohibition in 61.22 does not
tional apply to the paving of roads with
asbestos tailings that are well
encapsulated in bituminous
material so that the release of
asbestos fibers will not occur.
EPA approval is necessary in order
to dispose of asbestos tailings at
an asphalt plant. The emission
control proposed by the asphalt
plant would have to be equal to or
exceed the level of control
required by section 61.25.
-------
NESHAPS APPLICABILITY DETERMINATIONS—ASBESTOS
(continued)
OODC
Date of
Response
QUESTION
AFFPOTO
REGULATION
DISCUSSION
MINATION
B-43
3/4/81
Is the "manufacture" §6l.22(c)
of slot gun shells
subject to the asbestos
regulations, if no
commercial asbestos is
used at the facility?
Na Although manufacturing of
shot gun shells is specifically
listed under the emission
standard in S61.22(c), the
Remington facility is not
subject to the regulations
because no catinercial asbestos
is used at the facility.
This facility assembles the
shells using a wad of asbestos
but the wads are produced from
ccmtercial asbestos at another
Remington facility.
B-44
3/31/81
B-45
4/15/81
Is a waste disposal
site subject to the
asbestos standard
when the disposal
site is not owned or
operated by the
generator of the
asbestos waste?
S61.22(j)
S6l.22(k)
S61.25
Is the Seagull $61.23(a)
modified electrostatic §61.23(c)
precipitator an accept-
able alternative for
the asbestos filtering
equipment described in
§61.23(a) and authorized
in §6l.23(c).
No Only disposal sites operated
by the generators of asbestos
waste are subject to the regula-
tions. Otherwise, generators
are responsible for disposing
of their waste at an acceptable
disposal site as defined in $61.25.
Hie waste disposal requirements
do not apply directly to the waste
disposal sites; the exception is
the case where the owner or operator
of an inactive disposal site previously
operated by a generator is subject to
to the regulations.
No Seagull's portable precipitator has
97 percent fractional efficiency for
total particulate with an aerodynamic
diameter of approximately 1.0 micrometer.
This efficiency is less than the 99.99
percent particulate mass collection
efficiency demonstrated at baghouse
applications. Therefore, it may be
expected that the asbestos collection
efficiency is less than equivalent
to the baghouse described in §61.23(a).
-------
CODE
Date of
Response
B-46
~37l8/ti2
NESHAPS APPLICABILITY DETERMINATIONS—ASBESTOS
(continued)
QUtSTIGN
AFFECTED
MEDIATION
nereu-
MlNATION
1. Is a indhuCacturing
source's recycled
asbestos waste subject
to the waste lianJling
regulations or tlie
manufacturing regula-
tions?
2. Is rail car
unloading of asbestos
at a subject source
covered by the regula-
tions?
3. Does the wetting
of asbestos waste
materials from a
demolition or renova-
tion automatically
make Uio source
subject to
$61.22(c)
S61.22(c)
Yes
S6l.22(d)(4)
DISCUSSION
If~a manufacturing source recycles its
asbestos waste by conveying it from a
baghouse to a mixing area for re-use, the
recycling operation is considered one of
tie processing operations referred to in
the definition of manufacturing.
Therefore the operation is subject to
S61.22(c). Waste handling procedures in
$61.22(j) are inappropriate for this
operation.
Based upon definitions in $61.21 and the
description in S61.22(c), all operations
at the Manufacturing site are subject to
the regulations. The operation of
unloading bags of commercial asbestos
received by rail to be used in the
manufacturing process are subject to
S61.22(c).
Since the source in question is
voluntarily complying with the work
practice of wetting friable asbestos
materials (J61.22(d)(4)), they should to
encouraged to complete the process by
disposing of the waste as outlined in
B-4T"
Ts an operationf to
ranove friable
asljestoe roofing
material from an
industrial coni>lex
subject to Ute
regulations for
dunolition and
renovation?
Tfcr the renovation operation to remove
roofing material to be subject to
$61.22(d), the roofing must be considered
a "structural member". Based upon the
definition of "structural member" in
$61.21 as amended en March 2, 1977. the
intent is to cover any non-load-supporting
munUiC, such as a roof. Therefore the
removal of roofing material should be
subject to the requirements foe
renovation given in S61.22(d).
-------
NESHAPS APPLICABILITY DETERMINATIONS—ASBESTOS
(continued)
Code
Date of
Response
Question
Affected
Regulat ion
Determi-
nat ion
Discussion
B-48 7/27/82 Does the asbestos $61.22(e)
standard apply to
the spraying of an
automotive under-
coating that contains
6% to 10% asbestos
fiber based on a
bituminous carrier.
No
According to 40 CFR S61 .22(e)(3), the
spraying of material containing asbestos
encapsulated in a bituminous or resinous
binder is exempted from the requirements
of the standard. Furthermore, the spray-
ing of automotive undercoating is speci-
fically exempted in the preamble dis-
cussion of the June 19, 1978 asbestos
revisions. (See 43 Federal Register
26372, June 19, 1978.)
B-49 8/27/82 a) Do the require- $61.25
merits for waste
disposal sites apply
to an asbestos set-
tling pond that has
a useful life of
twenty years?
b) Do they apply to
a settling pond that
is used for temporary
l storage of asbestos
waste before it is
1 transferred to a
landfill?
yes
No
The settling pond is considered an active
waste disposal site and must meet the
requirements of $61.25. That section
prohibits visible emissions from the
disposal site and requires that warning
signs and fencing be installed.
In this case the landfill is considered
the waste disposal site and iV required
to comply with SM.25. The settling pond
is subject to the requirements of 40 CPR
S61.22(j) which govern interim steps in
the collection of asbestos - containing
wastes prior to deposition at an accept-
able waste disposal site.
-------
NESHAPS APPLICABILITY DETERMINATIONS—ASBESTOS
(continued)
Code
B-50
Reference
Memo (Reich to Kee),
10/26/82
Question
A company uses commercial asbestos
to manufacture caulks and
roofing sealants. The company
wants to lower costs by disposing
of the hags, which previously
contained this commercial
asbestos, at an ordinary waste
landfill. If these empty bags
are melted down into nonfriable
plastic rocks, roust they he
deposited at waste disposal sites
operated in accordance with
40 CFR 61.25?
(Affected
Regulation
S61.21(w);
-------
NESHAPS APPLICABILITY DETERMINATIONS—ASBESTOS
(continued)
CODE
REFERENCE
QUESTION
AFFECTED
REGULATION
DETERMINATION
DISCUSSION
Fabricating is defined at
S61.21(s) as "any processing
of a manufactured product contain-
ing commercial asbestos, with the
exception of processing at
temporary sites for the
construction or restoration of
buildings, structures, facilities
or installations." The stripping
or debonding of the old pads and
the bonding of new ones is
considered the processing of a
manufactured product containing
commercial asbestos. The Control
Techniques Document for Asbestos
Air Pollutants (AP-117, February
1973, pp. 3-29 to 3-36), a part
of the asbestos standard public
record, makes clear that debonding
or stripping is considered part of
friction product processing, and
as such, its emissions are covered
under S61.22(h). Although the
bonding of asbestos friction
material on motor vehicles is
exempted at S61.22(h)(2) from the
fabrication provisions, no
exemption is allowed for the
debonding or stripping of such
materials.
B-51
Memo (Reich to
Davis), 10/26/82.
Worn asbestos pads are replaced
with new ones. The worn pads are
stripped and the new ones riveted
into place. Attaching the new pads
involves no grinding, cutting, or
other altering; they are precut
and consist of 20% encased asbestos,
Since stripping the old pads
results in asbestos emissions, is
this operation considered
fabrication subject to S61.22(h>?
S61.2l(s)
S61.22(h)
Yes
-------
NESHAPS APPLICABILITY DETERMINATIONS—ASBESTOS
(continued)
CODE
R-52
00
8-53
REFERENCE
Memo (Reich to
Kee), 10/27/82.
Memo (Copeland
to Thomson)
A/13/83
QUESTION
a) Adhesives are manufactured
using a raw material known as
Hedmanite, which is a short-fiber
form of asbestos mined from a
naturally-occuring formation.
Is this operation subject to the
asbestos regulations, 40 CFR 61,
Ruhpart B?
b) Two sources receive dry resin
mixtures containing commercial
asbestos. The mixtures are
placed in heated presses to form
the cores for grinding wheels and
abrasive discs. Are the sources
subject to the asbestos standard?
Are asbestos emissions from
gold mining covered by the
asbestos NESHAP?
AFFECTED
REGULATION
S61.22(c)
S61.22(c)
40 CFR 61,
Subpart B
DETERMINATION
Yes
No
No
DISCUSSION
Hedmanite meets the definition of
commercial asbestos at S61.21(h) as
"any variety of asbestos produced by
extracting asbestos from asbestos ore."
Manufacturing of asbestos is defined at
461.21(1) as the combining of
commercial asbestos with any other
materials and the processing of this
combination into specified products.
Section 61.22 (c)(7) specifies one such
product as adhesives. Since Hedmanite
is commercial asbestos combined with
other materials and processed into
adhesives, it is subject to the asbestos
regulations of 40 CFR 61, Subpart B.
Grinding wheels and abrasive discs are
not considered friction products, as
that term is intended. EPA's "Back-
ground Information on NESHAPs-
Proposed Amendments to Standards for
Asbestos and Mercury," October 1974,
indicates that the term "friction
products" refers to those products
designed to create friction in order to
stop movement-brake linings and clutch
plates. Products such as abrasive
discs and grinding wheels do not fall
under this category. These sources are
not subject to the manufacturing or
fabricating provisions because the
products'they process do not fit into
any of the manufacturing or fabrication
categories listed at S61.22(c) and (h) .
"L.e asbestos NESHAP does not apply
to any mining operation but does
cover milling of asbestos ore to
produce commercial asbestos. Since
the gold mining operation does
not involve commercial asbestos
production, any mining operation
would not be covered by the
NESHAP.
------- |