EPA-540/1-86-018
                                               Office of Emergency and
                                               Remedial Response
                                               Washington DC 20460
                        Superfund
vvEPA
Off'ce of Research and Development
Office of Health and Environmental
Assessment
Environmental Criteria and
Assessment Office
Cincinnati OH 45268
                         HEALTH EFFECTS  ASSESSMENT
                         FOR  NICKEL

-------
                                           EPA/540/1-86-018
                                           September 1984
       HEALTH  EFFECTS  ASSESSMENT
                FOR  NICKEL
    U.S. Environmental Protection  Agency
     Office of Research and Development
Office of Health  and  Environmental Assessment
Environmental Criteria and Assessment  Office
            Cincinnati,  OH  45268
    U.S. Environmental  Protection  Agency
  Office of  Emergency and Remedial Response
Office of Solid Waste and  Emergency  Response
            Washington, DC  20460

-------
                                  DISCLAIMER

    This  report  has  been  funded  wholly  or  In  part by  the  United  States
Environmental  Protection  Agency under  Contract  No.  68-03-3112  to  Syracuse
Research Corporation.  It has been  subject  to  the Agency's peer and adminis-
trative review, and  1t has  been  approved  for  publication as an EPA document.
Mention of  trade  names or  commercial  products  does  not  constitute  endorse-
ment or recommendation for use.
                                      11

-------
                                    PREFACE
    This report  summarizes  and evaluates Information relevant  to  a prelimi-
nary  Interim  assessment  of  adverse health  effects  associated  with  nickel.
All  estimates  of acceptable  Intakes and  carcinogenic  potency  presented  In
this  document  should  be  considered  as  preliminary  and  reflect  limited
resources  allocated   to  this  project.   Pertinent  toxlcologlc   and  environ-
mental data were located  through on-Hne  literature  searches  of the Chemical
Abstracts,   TOXLINE,   CANCERLINE  and the  CHEMFATE/OATALOG  data bases.   The
basic  literature  searched  supporting   this   document   1s   current   up  to
September,   1984.   Secondary  sources of  Information have  also been  relied
upon  1n  the  preparation of  this   report  and  represent  large-scale  health
assessment   efforts that  entail extensive peer  and Agency review.  The  fol-
lowing  Office  of  Health and  Environmental  Assessment  (OHEA)   sources  have
been extensively utilized:


    U.S. EPA.   1980b.   Ambient Water Quality Criteria for  Nickel,  with
    Errata   for  Ambient Water  Quality  Criteria  Documents dated  June  9,
    1981  (Updated:   February  23,   1982).    Environmental  Criteria  and
    Assessment  Office,  Cincinnati, OH.   EPA  440/5-80-060.    NTIS  PB
    81-11715.

    U.S. EPA.   1983a.  Health  Assessment  Document  for  Nickel.   Environ-
    mental   Criteria  and  Assessment  Office,  Research Triangle  Park, NC.
    EPA 600/8-83-012A.  NTIS PB 83-213827.

    U.S. EPA.   1983b.   Re.portable   Quantity  for Nickel  (and  Compounds).
    Prepared  by  the  Environmental  Criteria  and  Assessment   Office,
    Cincinnati, OH,  OHEA for  the  Office of  Solid Waste and  Emergency
    Response,  Washington, DC.

    U.S. EPA.    1985.    Drinking  Water  Criteria   Document  for  Nickel.
    Prepared  by  the  Environmental  Criteria  and  Assessment   Office,
    Cincinnati, OH,  OHEA for the Office of  Drinking Water,  Washington,
    DC.  (Final draft)


    The Intent  1n these  assessments  Is to  suggest  acceptable  exposure levels
whenever sufficient  data  were  available.   Values  were not derived  or  larger
uncertainty factors  were employed  when   the  variable  data  were limited  1n
scope  tending  to generate conservative  (I.e.,  protective)  estimates.   Never-
theless, the  Interim values  presented  reflect the relative degree  of  hazard
associated  with exposure or  risk to  the chemlcal(s) addressed.

    Whenever possible, two categories of  values have been  estimated for  sys-
temic  toxicants (toxicants for which cancer  Is  not the  endpolnt of  concern).
The  first,  the AIS  or acceptable  Intake  subchronlc,  1s  an  estimate of  an
exposure level  that  would   not  be  expected  to cause  adverse   effects  when
exposure occurs  during a limited  time  Interval  (I.e.,  for an  Interval  that
does  not constitute  a  significant  portion of  the Hfespan).    This  type  of
exposure estimate  has not  been  extensively  used  or  rigorously defined,  as
                                      111

-------
previous risk  assessment efforts have been  primarily  directed  towards expo-
sures  from toxicants  1n  ambient  air or  water  where lifetime  exposure  Is
assumed.   Animal  data  used  for  AIS  estimates  generally  Include  exposures
with durations  of  30-90 days.   Subchronlc  human data are  rarely available.
Reported exposures are  usually  from chronic occupational  exposure situations
or from reports of acute accidental exposure.

    The  AIC,  acceptable  Intake  chronic,  Is similar  In  concept to  the  ADI
{acceptable  dally  Intake).   It Is  an  estimate of an  exposure level  that
would  not  be expected  to  cause adverse effects when  exposure  occurs  for  a
significant portion  of  the Hfespan  [see  U.S.   EPA  (1980a)  for  a discussion
of  this concept].   The AIC  1s  route  specific and estimates  acceptable
exposure for  a given  route  with  the Implicit  assumption  that  exposure  by
other routes 1s Insignificant.

    Composite  scores  (CSs)   for  noncarclnogens  have  also been  calculated
where data  permitted.   These  values are  used for  ranking  reportable quanti-
ties; the methodology for their development  Is explained  In U.S.  EPA (1983c).

    For compounds for which there  Is  sufficient  evidence  of carclnogenlclty,
AIS  and AIC values  are not  derived.   For  a  discussion  of risk  assessment
methodology for  carcinogens  refer  to  U.S.  EPA  (1980a).   Since cancer  1s  a
process that  Is  not  characterized  by  a  threshold,  any exposure contributes
an Increment of risk.   Consequently,  derivation of  AIS and AIC  values would
be Inappropriate.  For   carcinogens,  q-|*s  have  been computed  based  on  oral
and Inhalation data 1f available.
                                      1v

-------
                                   ABSTRACT
    In  order  to  place  the  risk  assessment  evaluation  In  proper  context,
refer  to  the preface  of  this  document.   The  preface  outlines  limitations
applicable to all documents  of  this  series  as  well  as the appropriate Inter-
pretation and use of the quantitative estimates presented.

    Human occupational  data  Indicate  that  nickel  refinery workers experience
an elevated  Incidence  of  tumors  of  the nasal  cavities  and  lungs.   The spe-
cific compounds Involved  1n  the  etiology of cancer  1n these workers have not
been  positively  Identified;   however,  nickel   carbonyl,   nickel   sulfate,
nitrate and  chloride have been  Implicated.  Animal  Inhalation  data Indicate
an association between certain nickel compounds and lung neoplasms.

    The  human epldemlologlcal  data   have  been used  to  calculate  a  q-j*  of
1.2  (mg/kg/day)'1  based on  lung and laryngeal  tumors  In  two  epldemlologl-
cal  studies.   This   q-j*  Is more  conservative  than  that  calculated  from the
Incidence of  lung  tumors  1n  animals  or than that calculated  from  the Inci-
dence of  total  lung, laryngeal  and  nasal  tumors In  the two epldemlologlcal
studies.

    Evidence  Is considered Inadequate to consider nickel  to be carcinogenic
by the  oral  route.   An oral AIS  of 1.4  mg/day has been  estimated based on a
6-week  feeding  study using  rats.  An oral  AIC of 0.7 mg/day  has been esti-
mated based on a 2-year  feeding  study In rats.   There are some uncertainties
concerning absorption  of  nickel  from  the  gastrointestinal  tract  which  are
reflected  In  an additional  uncertainty factor.   In addition, the toxlclty
data base 1s considered limited.

-------
                               ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
    The  Initial  draft  of  this  report  was  prepared  by Syracuse  Research
Corporation  under  Contract No.  68-03-3112  for EPA's  Environmental  Criteria
and  Assessment  Office,  Cincinnati,  OH.   Or.  Christopher  DeRosa and  Karen
Blackburn were the Technical Project Monitors  and  Helen Ball  was',the Project
Officer.  The final documents  1n  this  series  were  prepared for the Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response, Washington, DC.

    Scientists from  the  following U.S. EPA offices  provided  review  comments
for this document series:

         Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office, Cincinnati, OH
         Carcinogen Assessment Group
         Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
         Office of Solid Waste
         Office of Toxic Substances
         Office of Drinking Water

Editorial review for the document series was provided by:

    Judith Olsen and Erma Durden
    Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office
    Cincinnati, OH

Technical support services for the document series  was provided by:

    Bette Zwayer, Pat Daunt, Karen Mann and Jacky Bohanon
    Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office
    Cincinnati, OH
                                      v1

-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY AND FATE 	
2. ABSORPTION FACTORS IN HUMANS AND EXPERIMENTAL ANIMALS . . . .
2.1.
2.2.
ORAL 	
INHALATION 	
3. TOXICITY IN HUMANS AND EXPERIMENTAL ANIMALS 	
3.1.


3.2.


3.3.


3.4..
SUBCHRONIC 	
3.1.1. Oral 	
3.1.2. Inhalation 	
CHRONIC 	
3.2.1. Oral 	
3.2.2. Inhalation 	
TERATOGENICITY AND OTHER REPRODUCTIVE EFFECTS 	
3.3.1. Oral 	
3.3.2. Inhalation 	
TOXICANT INTERACTIONS 	
"4. CARCINOGENICITY 	
4.1.


4.2.


4.3.
4.4.
HUMAN DATA 	
4.1.1. Oral 	
4.1.2. Inhalation 	
BIOASSAYS 	
4.2.1. Oral 	
4.2.2. Inhalation 	
OTHER RELEVANT DATA 	
WEIGHT OF EVIDENCE 	
5. REGULATORY STANDARDS AND CRITERIA 	
1
1
. . 1
. . 1
1
. . 1
. . 1
. . 1
1
. . 1
, , 1
1
. . 1
, , 1
. . 1
1
. . 1
. . 1
. . 1
. . 1
. . 1
. . 1
. . 1
1
. . 1

-------
                           TABLE OF CONTENTS  (cont.)
6. RISK ASSESSMENT 	
6.1. ACCEPTABLE INTAKE SUBCHRONIC (AIS) 	
6.1.1. Oral 	
6.1.2. Inhalation 	
6.2. ACCEPTABLE INTAKE CHRONIC (AIC) 	
6.2.1. Oral 	
6.2.2. Inhalation 	
Page
	 10
	 10
	 10
	 10
	 10
	 10
	 10
     6.3.   CARCINOGENIC POTENCY (qi*)  	    10

            6.3.1.    Oral	    10
            6.3.2.    Inhalation	    10

 7.  REFERENCES	    10

APPENDIX: Summary Table for Nickel  	    10
                                     V111

-------
                               LIST OF TABLES

No.                               Title                                Page

3-1     Subchronlc Toxlclty of Orally Administered Nickel 	    5

3-2     Subchronlc Toxlclty of Inhaled Nickel 	    6

3-3     Chronic Toxlclty of Orally Administered Nickel	    8

3-4     Chronic Toxlclty of Inhaled Nickel	   10

4-1     Mortality by Cause and Year of First Employment, Clydach
        Nickel Refinery, Wales	   15

4-2     Carclnogenlclty Studies Involving Chronic Inhalation
        Exposure to Nickel	   17
                                     1x

-------
                             LIST OF  ABBREVIATIONS





ADI                     Acceptable dally Intake



AIC                     Acceptable Intake chronic



AIS                     Acceptable Intake subchronlc



BCF                     Bloconcentratlon factor



bw                      Body weight



CAS                     Chemical Abstract Service



CS                      Composite score



DNA                     Deoxyrlbonuclelc acid



LOAEL                   Lowest-observed-adverse-effect level



NOEL                    No-observed-effect level



ppb                     Parts per billion



ppm                     Parts per million



RNA                     Rlbonuclelc acid



SO                      Standard deviation



STEL                    Short-term exposure limit



TLV                     Threshold limit value



TWA                     Time-weighted average

-------
                     1.   ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY AND FATE

    Nickel is  a  metal  that belongs  to the first transitional  series  of  the
periodic  table.   Elemental  nickel  has  a  CAS  Registry number  of  7440-02-0.
In  the  environment, nickel  almost  always  occurs  in  the 0  and  +2  valence
states  (Cotton  and  Wilkinson,  1980).   Besides  a  variety  of  Inorganic
compounds, nickel  forms  a  number  of  complexes  with organic  Ugands.   Both
Inorganic  and  organic nickel  compounds  have  a  variety  of  uses  (Antonses,
1981).
    In  the atmosphere,  nickel   1s  expected to  be present as  dusts and fumes
from  nickel  smelting  and  processing facilities, coal  burning  and  dlesel  oil
combustion (Flshbein,  1981).    The  atmospheric fate of  nickel has  not  been
studied  comprehensively.   Any  chemical  Interaction of  nickel  compounds  1n
the  atmosphere 1s  likely  to result  in the conversion  of  nickel  to  nickel
oxide and  not  Its  direct  removal  through decomposition,  as  frequently occurs
with  organic compounds.   For example,  nickel carbonyl  1s likely to be oxlda-
tlvely  converted  to nickel oxide  1n the  atmosphere (U.S.  EPA, 1983a).   The
principal  removal  mechanisms  for  atmospheric nickel are  wet  and dry deposi-
tion  (Flshbein,  1981).   The atmospheric half-life  for  the  physical  removal
mechanism  1s expected to  depend on the particle size and particle density of
atmospheric  nickel or  Its  compounds.   In one  study,  enrichment  of  nickel
from  coal-fired  power  plants  was  found  to occur  In partlculate fractions of
diameter  <1  vm  (U.S.  EPA,  1983a).   Partlculate  nickel   1n  such  small sizes
is  expected  to have a  long lifetime in the atmosphere.  No  estimate  of  the
atmospheric  lifetime for nickel 1s available.
    The  aquatic  fate  of  nickel  has  been  studied   extensively  (Callahan  et
al.,  1979).    In  most  aerobic  aquatic  environments,  nickel  may exist  1n
                                      -1-

-------
solution as hydroxide, carbonate,  sulfate  and  organic  complexes (Callahan et
al.,  1979).    Some  of  the nickel  1n  solution  may  be copredpltated  with
hydrous metal  oxides  or  sorbed onto organic material,  or  1t  may undergo 1on
exchange with  crystalline minerals.  The ratio of  the  dissolved and precipi-
tated  nickel  In an aquatic medium may be  dependent  upon  the  nature  of the
medium.  In general,  1t  appears that 1n pristine  waters  sorptlon  to hydrous
Iron or  manganese  oxides controls dissolved nickel  concentrations,  while In
polluted  waters a  higher  concentration  of  dissolved nickel  Is  expected
(Callahan et  al.,  1979).   No  estimate of  the  aquatic  half-life of nickel 1s
available 1n the literature.
    The  fate  of nickel  In  soil  has  been  studied  Inadequately;  however, the
fate may be dependent upon the nature of  soil.   Soils containing  relatively
higher   proportions   of   Iron  and   manganese    oxides   may   sorb   nickel
significantly.   Soils  rich  1n  organic  matter  content   may  enhance  the
mobility  of   nickel   through  complexatlon.   Although   nickel   has  not  been
detected at appreciable  concentration  In most  groundwaters  (Flshbein,  1981),
Page (1981) reported  the detection of  nickel  1n  almost 100% groundwater at a
median concentration of 3 ppb.
    The BCFs for nickel  In  aquatic organisms  have  been determined  by several
Investigators   and  have been  found  to vary from  <20 for marine plankton to
40,000  1n  an  algae (Callahan  et  al.,  1979).   The bloaccumulatlon  factor In
edible fish,  however,  may not  exceed 100 (Callahan et al.,  1979).
                                     -2-

-------
           2.  ABSORPTION FACTORS  IN HUMANS AND EXPERIMENTAL ANIMALS
2.1.    ORAL
    A  number  of  studies  Indicate  that  1n  animals,  1-10%  of  the  nickel
Ingested 1n the diet  or  in aqueous solution  is  absorbed  by  the gastrointes-
tinal tract (Horak  and  Sunderman, 1973; Nodiya,  1972;  Nomoto  and Sunderman,
1970; Perry and  Perry, 1959;  Tedeschl  and  Sunderman, 1957).
2.2.    INHALATION
    Nickel can  be  Inhaled  either  In  gaseous  form, as  nickel  carbonyl  or  1n
particulate form.   Sunderman  and Selln (1968) reported  that  nickel  carbonyl
was  readily  absorbed by  rats  exposed  to 100  mg  N1/8.  air  for  15  minutes.
WHhin 4  days after treatment,  26% of  the administered dose  was  excreted  in
the urine.
    On the other hand, particulate nickel  in  the form of nickel oxide is not
readily absorbed by  inhalation.   Leslie et al.  (1976) exposed rats  to nickel
In welding fumes  (8.4  yg/m3) -and observed  no  clearance  from the  lungs- or
elevation of nickel levels 1n the blood within 24 hours of treatment.
    Similarly,  Wehner and  Craig  (1972)  exposed   hamsters  to nickel  oxide
particles  (2-160  yg/8.;   1-2.5   ym mass  median  aerodynamic   diameter)  and
measured  the  deposition  of nickel  in  the lungs.   Of the 20%  of  the admin-
istered dose deposited in  the lungs,  50%  remained at 45 days post-treatment.
Furthermore,  levels of nickel  in the  tissues  did not  Increase,  Indicating
that absorption was negligible.
     In  contrast,  mice exposed  to an  aerosol  of  nickel  chloride  cleared 75%
of the  administered dose within  4 days of treatment  (Graham  et  al., 1978),
Indicating  appreciable absorption.   The  discrepancy  between  this  and  the
previously mentioned  studies  can  probably be accounted for  1n terms of the
greater solubility  of nickel  chloride as compared with  that of  nickel oxide.
                                      -3-

-------
                3.  TOXICITY  IN HUMANS AND EXPERIMENTAL ANIMALS
3.1.   SUBCHRONIC
3.1.1.   Oral.   Studies  pertaining  to  the  subchronlc  toxldty  of  orally
administered nickel are summarized 1n Table  3-1.
    Whanger  (1973) exposed  weanling rats to 0,  100,  500 or  1000  ppm nickel
(as nickel  acetate)  1n the  diet  for  6  weeks.   Assuming that a  weanling  rat
consumes a  quantity  of food equivalent to 10% of  Us  body  weight/day, these
dietary levels  can be  converted  to doses of 0,  10, 50 and  100  mg/kg bw/day.
No  significant  effects were reported  at  the  10  mg/kg  bw/day  level,  while
rats  exposed  to  >50   mg/kg bw/day  had  hematologlcal  changes  (decreased
hematocrit  and  hemoglobin  concentrations),  decreased  cytochrome  oxldase
activity and  a  reduction  In the  rate of  gain  of body weight.   A  NOEL of 10
mg/kg bw/day can thus  be established from these data.
    In  the  subchronlc  studies  by Clary (1975) and  Waltschewa et al. (1972),
effects (see  Table 3-1) were observed  1n  rats  exposed to drinking water-con-
taining 225 ppm nickel (22.5 mg N1/kg bw/day, assuming that a  rat consumes
0.035  8, water/day and  weighs  0.35 kg), and 1n  rats  treated by gavage with
25  mg N1/kg bw/day,  respectively.
3.1.2.   Inhalation.   Studies  pertaining  to  the  subchronlc  toxldty  of
Inhaled  nickel  are  summarized   1n  Table  3-2.    The salient  feature  here 1s
that  adverse effects  (particularly pulmonary  effects)  were  seen  at  all  the
levels  of  exposure (0.04-0.594 mg/kg/day)  employed 1n four  different studies
(Welscher  et  al.,  1980;  Ottolenghl  et  al.,  1974;  Blngham et  al.,  1972;
Johansson  et  al.,  1981).   The  lowest  level  of  exposure that  produced effects
was  reported  for  rats by  Blngham  et  al.  (1972).   Unfortunately,  these
Investigators  do not  report the  numbers of animals  treated nor  the actual
length  of  exposure ("up to  several months").
                                      -4-

-------
                                                                   TABLE 3-1



                                               Subchrontc Toxlclty of Orally Administered Nickel







1
Ift
1





Species Number Vehicle Compound
weanling 24 diet nickel
rats acetate





Rats 10/group drinking nickel
water chloride

Rats NR gavage nickel
sulfate

Dose Duration Effects
100, 500, 1000 6 weeks 100 ppra, no effects; 500 or 1000
ppm N1 ppm, decreased body weight gain.
hematologlcal changes .reduced cyto-
chroine oxtdase activity In heart.
significantly reduced Iron content
In red blood cells

225 ppm N1 4 months Reduced body weight and lower levels
of serum Itptd and cholesterol at the
time of sacrifice
0, 25 mg/NI/kg 120 days Degenerative cellular changes In the
bw/day liver and kidney, and testlcular
changes
References
Uhanger. 1973






Clary. 1975


Ualtschewa
et al., 1972

NR - Not reported

-------
                                                                 TABLE 3-2

                                                    Subchronlc Toxlclly of Inhaled Nickel
Species Number Compound Dose as Nickel*
Rat NR nickel oxide 200. 400. 800
iig/m3 (0.148,
0.297. 0.594 mg/kg
bw/day)


Rat 120 N and nickel sulflde 0 or 0. 97^0. 18
104 F/group dust mg/m' (0 or 0.13
mg/kg bw/day)


Rat NR nickel oxide 120 vq/m» (-0.04
, mg/kg bw/day)
v
\
Rat NR nickel chloride 109 pg/m" (-0.04
mg/kg bw/day)

Rabbit 6/group nickel dust 0 or 1.0 mg/m3
(0 or 0.2S mg/kg/day)


Duration
continuously for
120 days




6 hours/day.
5 days/week
for 78 weeks


• 12 hours/day
up to several
months

12 hours/day. 6
days/week up to
several months
6 hours/day, 5
days/week for
6 months

Effects
all levels, decreased kidney
weights and growth rates; In-
creased lung weight and urinary
alkaline phosphatase activity;
severe lung, liver and kidney
lesions
significantly Increased mor-
tality beyond 52 weeks; pul-
monary lesions; 28/208 treated
animals had tumors as compared
with 2/115 controls
thickening of alveolar walls
and respiratory bronchi


hyperplastlc eplthella


changes In lung macrophage
morphology; evidence of pneu-
monia In all 6 treated rabbits
as compared with 1 control
References
Melscher et
al., 1980




Ottolenghl
et al.. 1974


Blngham et
al.. 1972


Blngham et
al., 1972

Johansson
et al.. 1981


'The values  In parentheses are calculated by the following equation:

         dose  In mg/kg/day = [Concentration  In mg/m« x (hours exposed/24 hours) x (days exposed/7  days)  x  (Inhalation rate In mVday)]
                                                  _ * the body weight of the animal In kg

            where:   Inhalation rate = 0.26 mVday for rats and  1.6 mVday for rabbits
                       body weight = 0.35 kg for rats  and 1.13 kg for rabbits

NR = Not reported

-------
3.2.   CHRONIC
3.2.1.   Oral.  Two studies  regarding  the chronic toxldty  of  orally admin-
istered nickel are summarized 1n Table  3-3.   Schroeder  et  al.  (1974) exposed
rats  to  5  ppm nickel  (unspecified  compound)  In drinking water  for  life and
observed an  ultimate  reduction  In  mean  body  weight  (p<0.025),  compared  to
controls.
    Ambrose  et  al.  (1976) exposed  rats  to 0,  100,  1000 or 2500  ppm nickel
(as nickel sulfate hexahydrate)  1n  the diet  (equivalent to  0,  5,  50 and 125
mg/kg bw/day) for  2  years.   At levels >1000  ppm  (>50  mg/kg/day),  effects  on
body weight  and  on  the ratio of organ-to-body  weight  were  observed.   A NOEL
was established  at 100  ppm  (5 mg/kg bw/day).   The U.S.  EPA (1985) conducted
an  Independent  statistical  analysis of  these  data  and found the  only sig-
nificant effect  to be  a lower mean body  weight 1n the  1000 ppm dietary dose
group.
    In a  3-generat1on  reproductive  study, Ambrose et  al.   (1976)  exposed  20
female W1star-der1ved  rats   to  0,   250,  500  or  1000 ppm  nickel  (as  nickel
sulfate hexahydrate)  In the  diet.   Assuming that  rats  consume  the equivalent
of  5% of their  body  weight  In  food/day, these  levels  can be  converted  to
doses  of  0,   12.5,  25  or  50 mg/kg bw/day.   At all  levels of  treatment,  a
higher Incidence  of  fetal mortality compared  with  controls was  observed  1n
the  F-   generation,  but  not  1n  the  F_ or  F~  generations.   Furthermore,
      I a                                  i      o
weanling body  weight  was reduced  at  the  highest  level  of  exposure  for  all
generations.
    The U.S.  EPA (1985) has  Identified several design  limitations Including
small  sample size (17-20 females  mated/generation)  and use of  pups  rather
than litters as  the unit  for  comparison  (the  Incidence  of  stillborn pups can
be  markedly   elevated   by  a  single  stillborn  Utter).   Furthermore,  the
                                      -7-

-------
                                                                              TABLE 3-3

                                                           Chronic Toxlclty of Orally Administered Nickel
Species
Rat
Number
52 N and 52
F/group
Vehicle Compound
drinking NR
water
Dose*
0, 5 ppm N1
(0. 0.5 ing/
kg/day)
Duration Effects
lifetime at 18 months mean body weight of
treated animals was significantly less
(p<0.025) than controls; no Increased
Incidence (p<0.025) of focal myo-
cardlal ftbrosls compared with
controls.
References
Schroeder et
al.. 1974
CO
I
Rat        25 N and 25     diet         nickel          0. 100. 1000.     2 years      100 ppm, no significant effects;
           F/group                      sulfate         2500 ppm N1                    1000 ppm, significant reduction In
                                        hexahydrate     (0. 5. 50,                     body weight for females at 6 weeks
                                                       125 mg/kg/day)                 and >26 weeks (p<0.05); 1000-2500
                                                                                      ppn, females had significantly higher
                                                                                      heart-to-body weight ratios and signif-
                                                                                      icantly lower Itver-to-body weight
                                                                                      ratios (p<0.05) than controls; both
                                                                                      males and females had significantly
                                                                                      reduced body weight at 2500 ppm.
Ambrose et
al., 1976
           "Dose values  In  parentheses  were calculated by multiplying the dietary  level  (ppm)  by  the fraction of body weight consumed as food/day (0.05
           for a rat) OR by multiplying the level In water by  the  fraction  of  body weight  consumed  as  water/day  (0.035 ml/day  * 0.35 kg).

           NR = Not reported

-------
results are equivocal and  do  not  clearly define a NOAEL or LOAEL.  The Inci-
dence of stillborn pups  did not  exhibit  a consistent dose-response relation-
ship,  the  Incidence  of  stillborn  pups  In  the 250  ppm  (12.5 mg  N1/kg  bw)
groups  was  Increased  1n  the  F,    but  not   the   F,.  generation  and  the
                                  i a                  ID
elevated Incidences  of  stillborn pups observed in  the first  generation  did
not occur 1n the subsequent two generations.
    In  another  3-generat1on  study,  Schroeder  and  MHchener  (1971)  exposed
five pairs of  Long-Evans  BLV(LE)  rats to  either  0  or 5 ppm nickel (unspeci-
fied salt) 1n  drinking  water.  Assuming that  rats  consume  the equivalent of
10%  of  their  body  weight  in drinking  water/day  (0.035  mil/day *  0.35  kg),
these  levels  are equivalent  to  doses  of  0  or  0.50 mg/kg bw/day.   In  all
three  generations,  neonatal  mortality  was significantly  Increased compared
with controls.  Furthermore,  the  number  of runts  was significantly Increased
1n the  first and third generations.   In  their  review of this study, U.S.  EPA
(1985) states:

         The ambient  water criteria was  originally  based on  this  study
    (U.S. EPA, 1980)  but  the  criterion was subsequently revised because
    a number of  design  problems  precluded the  use  of the  Schroeder and
    MHchener  (1971) study   for  risk  assessment  purposes  (U.S.  EPA,
    1982).    Design  problems  Included  small sample  size (five  females
    were mated to  produce  the   F]  generation),   use of  diets  low  1n
    trace metals (deficient 1n chromium) and use  of  animals  rather than
    Utters as the unit  for  statistical  analysis.   An  attempt  was made
    to  duplicate these  results,  however,  the  Investigators  were  unsuc-
    cessful.

3.2.2.   Inhalation.   Chronic  Inhalation data   for nickel  are  summarized  In
Table  3-4.   In  both studies  (Hueper,   1958;  Wehner et  a!.,  1975),  severe
effects, Including death and  pathological  changes  1n the  respiratory  system,
were  seen  at  the  levels  of  exposure  employed  (15  mg/m3   In  the  Hueper
study,   53.2  mg/m3  1n the  Wehner  et  al.   study).   It  should  be  noted  that
                                     -9-

-------
             TABLE  3-4



Chronic Toxlclty of Inhaled Nickel
1
0
1


Species Number
Guinea pig 32 N. 10 F
Rat 50 H. 110 F
Mouse 20 F
Hamster 102
Compound
nickel
(metallic dust)
nickel
(metallic dust)
nickel
(metallic dust)
nickel oxide
Dose as Nickel
(mg/m»)
15
15
15
53.2
Duration
6 hours/day, 5 days/
week for 21 months
6 hours/day. 5 days/
week for 21 months
6 hours/day, 5 days/
week for 15 months
7 hours/day, 5 days/
week for life
Effects
early death, pulmonary edema.
hyperemla, hemorrhage, liver
necrosis
early death, pleurisy, pneu-
monia, congestion, edema,
bronchi ectasts
early death, hemorrhaglc
lungs, congested liver
lung lesions (pneumoconlosis),
emphysema, early death,
References
Hueper ,
195B

Uehner et
al.. 1975
                                           bronchial hyperplasla

-------
these  levels  are  well  above  the  TLVs recommended  by  the  ACGIH  (1983) for
metallic  nickel   (1  mg/m3)  or soluble  compounds  of  nickel (0.1  mg/m3)  1n
the workplace.
3.3.   TERATOGENICITY AND OTHER REPRODUCTIVE EFFECTS
3.3.1.   Oral.   Pertinent   data   regarding   the   teratogenldty  of  orally
administered  nickel  could not be  located 1n the  available  literature;  how-
ever,  other  reproductive  effects  associated  with  oral  exposure  to nickel
have been discussed 1n Section 3.2.1.
3.3.2.   Inhalation.  Sunderman  et al.  (1959)  Investigated  the teratogenl-
dty  of  nickel  carbonyl  vapors   1n  F1scher-344   rats.   Pregnant  rats  were
exposed  to  0.08,  0.16 or  0.30 mg/S. nickel  carbonyl  for  15  minutes  on  days
7,  8  or  9  of gestation.  Pups  were  either removed  from dams   on  day  20 of
gestation or  were  born  naturally.  Of those pups  born  to mothers exposed to
0.30  mg/8,   nickel  carbonyl  on day  7  of  gestation, 25% had  eye  malforma-
tions.   Of  the  pups delivered by  Caesarian  section, 64  of  433 had eye  mal-
formations.   Furthermore, the highest  incidence  of  eye malformations  was
found  1n pups removed  from  dams  exposed  to 0.30 mg/ms,  on  day  7  of gesta-
tion.  A significant  number  of anomalies was also  seen  1n fetuses  delivered
from mothers  exposed  to 0.16  mg/s. on  day 7 of gestation.   Furthermore, two
fetuses  of  dams  exposed to  0.08  mg/2.  had  anomalies  (the  total  number  of
fetuses  was not specified  1n the  secondary  source).   There were no malforma-
tions  in fetuses  delivered  from  sham-treated dams  or  from  dams exposed  to
carbon monoxide.   Thus,  inhalation of nickel carbonyl  produced dose-related
teratogenic effects 1n rats.
3.4.   TOXICANT INTERACTIONS
    Nickel   appears  to antagonize  the  arrhythmias  Induced by cardiac glyco-
sldes  such  as  dlgltoxln,   presumably  by  competing  with  calcium  at   the
membrane binding site (Prasad et  al.,  1980).

                                     -11-

-------
    Nickel also seems to have a synerglstlc effect on the cardnogenlclty of
polycycllc  aromatic  hydrocarbons  (Maenza  et  al.,  1971;  Kasprzak  et  al.,
1973),   and  may  also play  a  role  1n  the cardnogenlclty  associated  with
asbestos  (NAS,  1975; Morgan  et  al.,  1973)  and  cigarette  smoke  (Kreyberg,
1978).
                                     -12-

-------
                              4.  CARCINOGENICITY
4.1.   HUMAN DATA
4.1.1.   Oral.   Data  pertaining to  the carclnogenlcHy  of orally  Ingested
nickel could not be located 1n the  available literature.
4.1.2.   Inhalation.   A  number  of  studies  provide  evidence  that   nickel
refinery workers  have  an Increased  risk  of contracting cancer  of  the nasal
cavities and  lungs  by  Inhalation.    The  nickel  compounds Implicated  1n  car-
dnogenesls  Include nickel  subsulflde  and nickel  oxide  dusts;  vapors  of
nickel carbonyl;  and  soluble  aerosols  of nickel sulfate, nickel  nitrate and
nickel  chloride   (Sunderman,  1977).   These cases  have been reviewed  exten-
sively by  numerous  authors (NIOSH,  1977;  IARC,  1976; NAS,  1975;  Sunderman,
1977).   Two  of  these  studies (Doll et  al.,  1977;  Pedersen et al.,  1973),
summarized below,  were used by  the  U.S.  EPA Carcinogen Assessment  Group 1n
the quantitative assessment of carcinogenic risk (U.S. EPA,  1983a).
    An  ep1dem1olog1cal  study  of  the  Increased  risk  of  cancer  in a  nickel
refinery at  Clydach, Wales,  was  reviewed and updated  by  Doll  et al.  (1977).
At  this  plant,  the Mond  refining  process for  nickel had  been used  since
1900, and  the  mortality of the workers was monitored  continuously.   Between
1900  and  about   1930,  the concentration  of  airborne nickel   was  20-25  mg
N1/m3 In  areas of  high  exposure  (International  Nickel Co., 1976).   Workers
employed during  this  period of time had a  higher  Incidence  of cancer  of the
nasal cavities  and  lungs than would be expected  1n  the  general population.
After 1925,  however,   the  Clydach  plant made  basic  changes 1n  the  refinery
process, which resulted  1n  pollution  control  and  a  subsequent decrease  1n
exposure  to  nickel.   Concomltantly, a reduction  1n  the  number of  observed
vs.  expected  cancers   of  the  nasal  cavity  and  lungs  was  observed  among
                                     -13-

-------
workers employed  1n  or  after  1930.   These  results  are summarized  in  Table
4-1.  As a  further note on this study, there has  been  some  speculation that
arsenic, a component  of  the nickel matte  feed material,  was  the causal  agent
1n  cardnogenesls.   Evidence  from  a Norwegian  study of occupational  expo-
sure, however, Implicates nickel as  the causal  agent  (Pedersen  et a!.,  1973,
1978;  Andersen  et al.,  1980;   Kreyberg,  1978;  Torjussen et  al.,  1979),  as
does a  study by  Sutherland  (1959), who  observed a  high  Incidence of  lung
cancer   In  an Ontario  nickel  refinery  where arsenic  was not a  component  of
the feed material.
    Pedersen  et   al.   (1973)   reported  on  the   incidence of  lung and  nasal
cavity   cancers among  workers  employed at  a Norwegian nickel refinery.   The
cohort  analyzed (1916 men) had  started working  at  the plant  at  least 3  years
prior to 1961 and were followed through 1971 .  The  results  were similar  to
those  reported  for the  Clydach workers  prior  to  1930; the  risks of  lung
cancer   and   nasal  cavity cancer  were  increased  3.75- and  27-fold,  respec-
tively.  In  a 1980 update  (Andersen et al., 1980),  2247  persons  were fol-
lowed  from  1953-1979.   Among  these,  there  were 21  cancers  of  the  nasal
cavities as  opposed to  the 0.88 expected,  and  82  lung  cancers  as opposed  to
the 22  expected.   In  a further  analysis of  these  same  data,  Kreyberg  (1978)
reported that  exposed workers  still  had  a  higher  incidence of  lung  cancer
even if  cigarette smoking was  taken Into  account.   In addition,  Torjussen
and Andersen  (1979)  reported  finding a higher  mean   concentration  of  nickel
in  the  nasal mucosa  of nickel  workers  (279.9+ SO  412.1)  than  in  controls
(12.9+  SO 20.3).   Unfortunately, the variance about the mean  is  large.
4.2.   BIOASSAYS
4.2.1.    Oral.   Data   specifically  pertaining   to  the  carcinogenlcity  of
orally  administered nickel could not be located in the  available literature.
                                     -14-

-------
                                                                   TABLE 4-1

                                Mortality by Cause  and  Year  of  First  Employment.  Clydach Nickel  Refinery.  Hales3


1
en
i



Year of First
Employment
Before 1910
1910-1914
1915-1919
1920-1924
1925-1929
All periods
before 1930
1930-1944
No. of
Nen
119
150
105
285
103
762
205
Han-Years
of Risk
1980.0
2665.5
2204.0
7126.5
2678.0
6655.0
4538.5
No. of Deaths From
Nasal Sinus Cancer'*
QC
14
24
11
7 (1)
0 (1)
56 (2)
0
Ed
0.036
0.137
0.025
0.071
0.026
0.195
0.034
0/E
389
649
440
99
0
287
0
No. of Deaths
From Lung Cancer
OC
24
34
20
50
9
37
8
E«»
2.389
3.267
3.070
9.642
3.615
1.983
5.463
0/E
10.0
10.4
6.5
5.2
2.5
6.2
1.5
No. of
Deaths From Other
malignant neoplasma
OC
10
10
10
27
7
64
11
E««
14.637
13.549
8.064
20.902
7.247
64.399
8.786
0/E
0.68
0.74
1.24
1.29
0.97
0.99
1.25
No. of Deaths
From Other Diseases
OC
69
69
48
25
44
55
58
Ed
84.95
75.99
44.28
15.63
41.02
61.87
46.14
0/E
0.81
0.91
1.08
1.08
1.07
0.98
1.25
aSource:  Doll et al.. 1977
 Number of cases of nasal sinus cancer  referred  to  as an associated  cause  of  death
""Observed
 Expected                                          _

-------
The following discussion of the Issue Is excerpted from U.S. EPA (1985):


         A  number  of   reviews  have  discussed  the  cardnogen1c1ty  of
    nickel  compounds  (U.S.  EPA,  1980;  NIOSH,  1977;  IARC, 1976;  NAS,
    1975;  Sunderman,  1981,  1979,  1977a, 1976,  1973).   It  1s  apparent
    from these reviews  that  the chemical  form  and route  of exposure are
    Important  factors   1n  determining   the  carcinogenic  potential  of
    nickel.   The  soluble  nickel  salts   do  not  generally  appear  to  be
    carcinogenic,  although  repeated  1.p.  Injections  of nickel  acetate
    at a  dose of  360 mg/kg  Induced lung carcinomas 1n  mice  (Stoner  et
    al.,  1976).

         The  results of  several  oral  studies suggest that  5 ppm nickel
    1n drinking water  1s not  carcinogenic  to  rats and  mice  (Schroeder
    et al.,  1974;  1964; Schroeder and  Mltchener,  1975).    Schroeder  et
    al.  (1974) exposed  a group of 52 male and  52 female weanling Long-
    Evans  rats  to 0 or  5 ppm nickel 1n  drinking water  for life.   The
    diet  for  both  control   and  treated  groups  contained   an  estimated
    0.44 yg  N1/g  of food.   Assuming the  average dally food and  water
    consumption of  the  rats  was  -5% and  7.8%  bw,  respectively,  average
    dally  doses  can be  calculated  as  0.02 and  0.41  mg  N1/kg bw  for
    control  and   exposed  rats,   respectively.   Tumor  Incidences  were
    determined  after   natural   death  of   the   experimental   animals.
    Longevity of  control and exposed rats  was  similar.   There  were  no
    significant differences  In tumor  Incidences  (sarcomas,  lymphomas  or
    carcinomas) between  the exposed  and  control groups.

         In an earlier  study with mice,  Schroeder  et al.  (1964)  exposed
    50 male and 54  female Charles River mice  to  5 ppm nickel  1n drink-
    Ing water.  This 1s  a dally dose  of -0.85  mg N1/kg  bw  assuming mice
    consume  water  at a  rate  equivalent to  17% of  their bw/day.   No
    estimate  of dietary  nickel Intake was provided, although the Inves-
    tigators  stated  that It was   low.   Causes  of death  were determined
    at autopsy  1n 33 and 41  treated females  and males,  respectively,
    and 60 female and 44 male controls.  The  number of  deaths  from all
    tumor  types  was  significantly   (p<0.01)  lower  1n  treated  females
    compared  with controls.   No other statistically  significant  differ-
    ences In  causes of  death  or longevity were  observed.   Early  mortal-
    ity was observed In  both the  exposed and control  groups.


U.S. EPA (1985) concluded that there  1s  Insufficient evidence  to support  the

cardnogenldty of nickel via the  oral route.

4.2.2.   Inhalation.  Four  cardnogenldty  studies  Involving  chronic  expo-

sure to nickel compounds  via  Inhalation are  summarized in  Table  4-2.   Hueper

(1958) reported that nickel powder was  tumorlgenlc 1n rats  and  guinea  pigs.
                                     -16-

-------
                                                                   TABLE  4-2

                                    Carclnogenlclty Studies  Involving Chronic  Inhalation Exposure to Nickel
Species/
Strain Number
Rats/Wlstar 50 N, 50 F
Rats/ 60 F
NIH black


Compound
nickel powder
(<4 i»ni in diameter)



Dose Duration
15 mg/m" 6 hours/day. 4-5
days/week for up
to 21 months



Effects References
128/160 died within 15 months; Hueper. 1958
15/50 rats of both strains were
found to have adenomatold lung
lesions (benign neoplasms) but
no excess of neoplasms In other
organs.
Guinea pigs/   32 N, 10 F
NR
Rats/Wlstar
Rats/Wlstar
Rats/
Fischer 344
                nickel powder           15 mg/m>
                (<4  iim In diameter)
64 N
32 N
41 controls
285 N
70 N controls
nickel carbonyl
nickel carbonyl

nickel carbonyl

0.03 mg/t
0.06 mg/t

0.03 mg/t

226 H and F     nickel  subsulflde       1 mg/m*
241 controls    (70X <1  lira In  dla-      average
                meter,  25X 1-1.5
                urn In diameter)
6 hours/day. 4-5
days/week for up
to 21 months
                                                    30 minutes. 3 times/
                                                    week for 12 months
                                                    30 minutes. 3 times/
                                                    week for 12 months
                                                    30 minutes, 3 times/
                                                    week until death
6 hours/day. 5
days/week for 78
weeks
23 animals survived >12 months,
2 survived >18 months; At death
nearly all animals had abnormal
adenomatold formations In the
alveolar and broncheolar
eplthella.

All animals were dead within
30 months of the first exposure;
4/9 rats surviving 2 years had
lung neoplasms; none of the
controls had pulmonary tumors.

8 treated rats survived >2
years, of these 1 had a pul-
monary adenocarcinemas with
metastases; 44 controls
survived >2 years, none had
pulmonary carcinomas.

Significantly higher number of
benign and malignant lung tumors
(p<0.01)  In treated animals
(14X) than In controls (IX);
treated animals. 10 adeno-
carclnomas, 3 squamous cell
carcinomas, 1 fIbrosarcoma;
Control animals. 1 adenocar-
clnoma.
                                                            Sunderman et
                                                            al.. 1957. 1959
                                                            Sunderman and
                                                            Donnelly. 1965
Ottolenghl
et al.. 1974
NR = Not reported

-------
In  studies  by  Sunderman  et  al.  (1957,   1959)  and  Sunderman  and  Donnelly
(1965),  animals  exposed  to  nickel  carbonyl  had  lung neoplasms,  but  the
numbers  of  animals  examined  were  small  (due  to  excessive mortality).   The
study  by Ottolenghl  et al.  (1974)  conclusively  demonstrated  that  Fischer
rats chronically exposed  to 1 mg  nickel  subsulf1de/m3 developed a  signifi-
cantly higher  number of lung tumors (p<0.01)  than  did controls.
    Other studies regarding the  carclnogenlcHy of  Inhaled nickel have  been
summarized  by  IARC  (1976).   These studies either were Inconclusive  because
of  confounding factors  (Hueper  and Payne, 1962),  gave negative  results  (52
yg/N10/S,  to  hamsters   for  life)  (Wehner, 1974;  Wenner   et  al.,  1975)  or
failed to employ  controls (Kasprzak et  al., 1973).
    These  animal  bloassays  studies  Indicate  that   nickel  subsulflde,  and
possibly nickel carbonyl, are carcinogenic  to  animals (IARC,  1982).
4.3.   OTHER RELEVANT DATA
    Nickel chloride  and nickel sulfate (soluble 1n water)  have  been  shown to
be  mutagenlc   1n  eukaryotlc  systems  (Mlyakl  et  al.,  1979;   Amacher   and
Palllet,  1980; Wulf,  1980).  Nickel  chloride  was  not mutagenlc  In  EscheM-
chla coll (Green et al., 1976) or  Bacillus subtnis  (Kanematsu  et al.,  1980;
Nlshloka, 1975).
    Nickel  compounds  have  also  been  shown to  Inhibit  DNA or  RNA synthesis
(Beach  and  Sunderman,  1970;  Leonard  et  al., 1981)  and  have Induced  DNA
breakage  and  repair  1n hamster  cells  Iji vitro  (Roblson and  Costa,  1982;
Roblson et al., 1982).
4.4.   WEIGHT  OF  EVIDENCE
    IARC (1982) concluded that the evidence for carclnogenlcHy to humans  Is
limited  for nickel  and certain   nickel compounds,  but sufficient for nickel
refining.
                                     -18-

-------
    According to the IARC criteria for evaluating  the  overall  weight  of evi-
dence of carc1nogen1c1ty  to  humans,  nickel  and nickel compounds  are  classi-
fied as  Group  2A chemicals, while nickel  refining 1s classified as  Group  1
(IARC,   1982).    The  corresponding  classifications  using  the  criteria  for
evaluating weight of evidence proposed by the  Carcinogen Assessment Group of
the U.S.  EPA (Federal  Register,  1984)  are Group  A  for  nickel refining  and
Group  B2 for  nickel  and compounds.   These  classifications  are  based  on
occupational and hence Inhalation exposure.
    The  lack  of data  concerning the  oral  cardnogenldty  of nickel  would
correspond to an IARC group  3 or  a CAG group 0.
                                     -19-

-------
                     5.   REGULATORY  STANDARDS AND  CRITERIA

    In  the  June  1981  Errata for  Ambient Water  Quality Criteria  Documents
(U.S.  EPA,  1980b),  a  criterion of  632  yg  nickel/a water  was  recommended,
based on the study of Ambrose et al. (1976).
    The ACGIH  (1983)  has  recommended TLVs for Inhalation exposure  to nickel
and  nickel  compounds 1n the workplace.   These Include a TWA-TLV of  0.35 mg
N1/m3  for  nickel  carbonyl  (to  protect from  chronic and acute  Intoxication
and  to minimize  potential  carcinogenic  effects),  a TWA-TLV  of 1  mg  N1/m3
for  nickel  sulflde  roasting  fumes  and dust  (with the cautionary  note  that
cancer  may  be  caused at levels below  this  value), a TWA-TLV  of  1  mg/m3 for
nickel  metal  and  a  TWA-TLV  of 0.1  mg/m3  with   an  STEL  of  0.3  mg/m3  for
soluble compounds of  nickel  (based  on  the observation that  soluble  compounds
of nickel may be carcinogenic while Insoluble compounds are not).
    NIOSH  (1977)   has  adopted  a  TL.V  of  0.007  mg/m3  for   nickel  carbonyl,
based  upon Us carcinogenic potential.
                                     -20-

-------
                              6.   RISK  ASSESSMENT
6.1.   ACCEPTABLE INTAKE SUBCHRONIC (AIS)
6.1.1.   Oral.   As  discussed  1n  Section  4.2.1.,  evidence  Is  currently
Inadequate to consider nickel carcinogenic by  the  oral  route.   Therefore, H
1s appropriate to develop an  AIS.   The only  subchronlc  study available which
demonstrates  a  NOEL  1s  a 6-week  study 1n which  weanling rats  were  admin-
istered nickel acetate  1n the diet.   The low dose, estimated  to be equiva-
lent  to  10  mg/kg bw/day, was a  NOEL  while the mid-dose,  estimated  to  be 50
mg/kg  bw/day,  resulted  In  depressed  weight  gain  and  hematologlcal  changes
(Whanger, 1973).
    Two other  subchronlc studies  defined  effect,  but  not  no-effect levels.
Clary  (1975) administered 225 ppm nickel  1n  the  drinking water  to rats for 4
months  (estimated  22.5  mg/kg/day).   These  animals  showed  reduced  body
weights as well  as  lower serum  I1p1d  and  cholesterol  levels.   Waltschewa et
al.  (1972)  administered 25  mg  N1/kg  bw/day  by  gavage  for  120  days.   These
animals  exhibited  degenerative  cellular  changes  1n  the  liver,  kidneys  and
testes.
    U.S.  EPA  (1985)  has  postulated  that  various  dietary components  may
retard  nickel  absorption by the  gastronlntestlnal  tract.   They have pointed
out  that  this may be a  particular concern for human exposures  by nickel 1n
drinking water.   Since  the comparability of  nickel absorption  by laboratory
animals of  nickel  1n feed  to human absorption of nickel from water  or  the
human  diet   1s   uncertain,  they  have  suggested   an  additional  uncertainty
factor of 0.2 be applied when extrapolating from animal  dietary exposures.
    An AIS can be estimated  from the  rat NOEL of 10 mg/kg bw/day established
1n a  6-week  feeding  study (Whanger, 1973).   Multiplying  by an  assumed human
body  weight  of 70  kg, by 0.2 to account for  possible absorption differences
                                     -21-

-------
and dividing by an uncertainty factor of  100  (10  for  Interspedes  extrapola-
tion and 10 for 1nter1nd1v1dual  variability)  results  In  an AIS of  1.4 mg/day.
6.1.2.   Inhalation.   Nickel  and  compounds have  been shown  to be  carcino-
genic to  humans  and  data  are sufficient  for  computation of  a q^*.   It  1s
Inappropriate, therefore,  to calculate an AIS  for  these  chemicals.
6.2.   ACCEPTABLE INTAKE CHRONIC (AIC)
6.2.1.   Oral.  As  discussed 1n Section  4.2.1.,  evidence  Is  Inadequate  to
consider nickel carcinogenic  by  the  oral route.  Therefore,  1t  1s  appropri-
ate  to  develop an  AIC for  oral exposure.  As a result  of design  and statis-
tical  deficiencies   In  the  Schroeder and  MHchener  (1971)   study  and  the
3-generat1on  portion of  the Ambrose  et al.  (1976)  study  as discussed  1n
Section 3.2.1., U.S.  EPA  (1985)  has  determined that  the  study of  Ambrose  et
al.  (1976)  In which  rats were  administered  nickel  1n the feed for  a  period
of  2  years  provides  the soundest basis  for an  AIC estimate.   In  this  study,
rats were fed  diets  containing  0,  100,  1000  or  2500  ppm nickel (estimated  to
provide doses  of  0,  5, 50 and  125 mg/kg bw/day).  A reanalysls of  the data
from  this  study  Indicated  a significantly lower  body weight  In the  1000 ppm
group (U.S.  EPA,  1985).   U.S. EPA (1985) considered  the  reduced  body weight
to  be an adverse effect and  chose  the 100 ppm dietary dose (5 mg/kg bw/day),
designated  a  NOAEL,  as the  basis  for ADI calculation.   Following  this pre-
cedent, assuming  a  70  kg  human body weight,  multiplying by  0.2  to account
for  possible  absorption differences  (see  Section  6.1.1.), and dividing by  an
uncertainty  factor   of  100  (10  for   Interspedes extrapolation  and  10  for
1nter1nd1v1dual variability)  results  1n  an AIC  of 0.7 mg/day.  This  estimate
should  be  reevaluated when  more complete data  concerning both  toxldty and
absorption are available.
                                     -22-

-------
6.2.2.   Inhalation.  Nickel  and  compounds  have  been shown  to be  carcino-
genic to  humans  and  data  are sufficient  for  computation  of  a q,*.   It  1s
Inappropriate, therefore, to calculate an AIC for  these chemicals.
6.3.   CARCINOGENIC POTENCY (q^)
6.3.1.   Oral.   The  lack   of  data  pertaining  to  the   cardnogenldty   of
orally Ingested nickel precludes  assessment of  carcinogenic risk.
6.3.2.   Inhalation.   The  U.S.   EPA   (1983a)   derived   cancer-based  risk
assessment  for  human exposure  to  nickel,  based  on  the animal  study  of
Ottolenghi  et  al.   (1974)  and  the human  ep1dem1olog1cal  studies  by  Doll  et
al. (1977) and Pedersen et al. (1973).
    Based  on  lifetime  exposure  to  1  yg  nickel  sulf1de/m3,   the  upper
limit risk  calculated from the   Ottolenghi  et al.  (1974)  data 1s  4.8xlO~3
(yg/m3)"1.   From  the Pedersen  et  al.  (1973)  study and  the Doll  et  al.
(1977) study,  the  upper  limit lifetime unit carcinogenic  risks for  lung  and
nasal  cancers   were  calculated   as   6.3xlO~4   and  8.1xlO~4   (yg/m3)"1,
respectively.  Taking the  geometric mean  of these  values  gives  a  lifetime
unit  carcinogenic  risk   of   7.1xlO~4   (yg/m3)""1   for   total   lung,   larynx
and nasal cancers.  This  Is only  slightly  less  than the  unit  risk  calculated
from the animal studies (4.8xlO~3).
    U.S.   EPA (1983a) also derived  a  value for  lifetime  unit  carcinogenic
risk, based only  on lung and  larynx  cancers  rather  than  on total  lung,
larynx and  nasal cancers.  This  was established  by taking the midpoint  of
the range of  the geometric mean  of  the  lifetime  unit  risks from  the  studies
of  Pedersen et  al.  (1973)  and   Doll  et  al.  (1977)  (7.5xlO~s,  5.8xlO~4).
                                     -23-

-------
Assuming  a  70  kg  man and  a human  Inhalation  rate  of  20 m3/day,  the mid-
point,  3.3xlO~4   (yg/m3)""1,   1s  adjusted  to   1.2   (mg/kg/day)'1  by  the
following formula:

                 3.3xlO~4(yg/m3)"1x70 kg  •=•  (20 m3)x!0~3  mg/yg.

A  complete  discussion  of  the  derivation  of  q *s  from various  data  bases
has been reported In U.S. EPA (1983a).
                                     -24-

-------
                                7.   REFERENCES

ACGIH  (American  Conference  of  Governmental  Industrial  Hyglenlsts).   1983.
Threshold Limit  Values  for  Chemical  Substances and  Physical  Agents  1n  the
Workroom  Environment  with  Intended  Changes  for  1983-84.   Cincinnati,  OH.
p. 27.

Amacher,  D.  and  S. Palllet.   1980.  Induction  of  tMfluorothymldlne-resIs-
tant  mutants  by  metal  Ions  In   L5178Y/TKt/"  cells.    Mutat.  Res.   78:
279-288.  (Cited  In U.S. EPA, 1985)

Ambrose,  A.M., P.S.  Larson,  J.R.  Borzelleca and  G.R.  Hennlgar,  Jr.   1976.
Long-term toxlcologlc assessment  of nickel  1n  rats  and dogs.   J.  Food Scl.
Techno!.  13: 181-187.   (Cited In U.S. EPA, 1985)

Andersen, A.,  A.  Hogetvelt  and  K. Magnus.   1980.   A follow-up  study among
Norwegian nickel  workers.   In.:  Nickel Toxicology,  S. Brown  and  F.W.  Sunder-
man, Ed., Academic Press,  London,  p.  31-32.  (Cited  1n  U.S.  EPA, 1983a)

Antonses, D.H.   1981.   Nickel  compounds.   In.:  Klrk-Othmer  Encyclopedia  of
Chemical  Technology, 3rd  ed.,  Vol. 15,  M.  Grayson and  E.  Eckroth,  Ed.  John
Wiley and Sons, Inc.,  NY.   p. 801-819.

Beach,  D.J.  and  F.W.  Sunderman,  Jr.   1970.   Nickel  carbonyl Inhibition  of
RNA  synthesis  by  a  chromatln-RNA  polymerase  complex  from  hepatic  nuclei.
Cancer Res.   30:  48-50.   (Cited 1n  U.S.  EPA, 1985)
                                     -25-

-------
Blngham,  E.,   W.  'Barkley,  M.  Zerwas,  K.   Stemmer  and  P.  Taylor.   1972.
Responses of  alveolar macrophages  to metals.   I.   Inhalation  of   lead  and
nickel.   Arch. Environ.  Health.   25:  406-414.  (Cited 1n U.S.  EPA,  1983b)

Callahan, M.A.. M.W.  Sllmak,  N.W.  Gabel, et al.  1979.   Water-Related  Envi-
ronmental Fate  of  129  Priority Pollutants.   Vol.   I.,  U.S.  EPA,  Office  of
Water Planning and Standards, Office  of  Water  and Waste Management,  Washing-
ton, DC.  EPA 440/4-79-0293.

Clary,  J.J.    1975.  Nickel chloride-Induced  metabolic  changes  1n the rat  and
guinea  pig.   Toxlcol.  Appl. Pharmacol.  31:  55-65.   (Cited In  U.S.  EPA,  1985)

Cotton,   F.A.   and  G.  Wilkinson.   1980.   Nickel.    In:  Advanced  Inorganic
Chemistry.  A Comprehensive  Text, 4th ed.   John WHey and Sons, Inc.,  NY.
p. 783-798.

Doll, R.,  J.D. Mathews  and  L.G.  Morgan.   1977.   Cancers of  the  lung  and
nasal sinuses  1n  nickel  workers: A reassessment of  the period  of  risk.  Br.
J. Ind.  Med.  34:  102-105.  (Cited 1n U.S. EPA, 1983a)

Federal    Register.    1984.   Environmental   Protection   Agency.    Proposed
guidelines for carcinogenic risk assessment.  49 FR  46294-46299.

F1shbe1n, L.   1981.  Sources, transport and alterations  of metal  compounds:
An  overview.   I.  Arsenic,  beryllium,  cadmium,  chromium and nickel.   Environ.
Health.   Perspect.   40: 43-64.
                                     -26-

-------
Graham,  J.A., F.J. Miller, M.J. Daniels, E.A. Payne and  D.E.  Gardner.   1978.
Influence  of cadmium,  nickel  and  chromium  on  primary Immunity  1n  mice.
Environ. Res.  16: 77-87.   (Cited  U.S.  EPA,  1983a)

Green,  M.H.L.,  W.J.  Muriel  and B.A.  Bridges.    1976.   Use  of a  simplified
fluctuation  test  to  detect  low levels  of mutagens.  Mutat.  Res.   38:  33-42.
(Cited 1n U.S. EPA, 1985)

Horak,  E.  and  F.W.  Sunderman, Jr.   1973.  Fecal  nickel  excretion  by  healthy
adults.   CUn. Chem.   19:  429-430.   (Cited  1n U.A. EPA,  1983a)

Hueper,   W.C.   1958.   Experimental  studies  In  metal  cardnogenesls.   IX.
Pulmonary  lesions 1n guinea pigs and rats exposed to  prolonged Inhalation of
powdered  metallic nickel.   Arch.  Pathol.   65:  600-607.   (Cited  In  NIOSH,
1977)

Hueper,  W.C.  and  W.W.  Payne.   1962.   Experimental studies 1n  metal  cardno-
genesls—Chromium,  nickel,   Iron,  arsenic.    Arch.   Environ.   Health.    5:
445-462.   (Cited  1n NIOSH, 1977)

IARC  (International   Agency   for  Research  on  Cancer).   1976.   Nickel  and
nickel  compounds.   In:  Cadmium, Nickel, Some Epoxldes,  Miscellaneous  Indus-
trial Chemicals  and  General  Considerations  on  Volatile  Anaesthetics.   IARC
Monographs  on  the  Evaluation  of  Carcinogenic   Risk  of Chemicals  to  Man.
IARC, WHO, Lyon,  France.   11: 75-112.
                                     -27-

-------
IARC  (International  Agency  for  Research  on  Cancer).   1982.   Results  and
conclusions.  In:  Chemicals,  Industrial  Processes and  Industries  Associated
with Cancer  1n  Humans.   IARC  Monographs on  the  Evaluation of  the  Carcino-
genic  Risk  of  Chemicals  to  Humans.   IARC,  WHO, Lyon,  France.  Vol.  1-29
(Suppl. 4).   p.  167-169.

International Nickel   Company.   1976.   Nickel  and  Its   Inorganic  compounds
Including nickel   carbonyl.   Unpublished supplementary  report  submitted  to
NIOSH.  p. 126.   (CHed 1n U.S. EPA, 1983a)

Johansson,  A.,  P.  Camner and  B.  Robertson.   1981.   Effects  of  long-term
nickel  dust  exposure  on  rabbit  alveolar  epithelium.   Environ.  Res.   25:
391-403.  (CHed 1n U.S. EPA, 1983b)

Kanematsu,  N.,  M. Hara  and  T.   Kada.   1980.   Rec-assay  and  mutagenlcHy
studies on  metal  compounds.   Mutat. Res.  77:  109-116.   (Cited  1n U.S. EPA,
1985)

Kasprzak,  K.S.,  L.  Marchow  and  J.  Breborowlcz.   1973.   Pathological  reac-
tions  1n  rat lungs  following Intratracheal  Injection  of nickel subsulphlde
and  3,4-benzpyrene.   Res.   Commun.   Chem.  Pathol.  Pharmacol.  6:  237-245.
(Cited  1n IARC, 1976)

Kreyberg,  L.   1978.   Lung  cancer 1n workers  1n  a nickel  refinery.   Br.  J.
Ind. Med.   35: 109-116.   (CHed  In U.S.  EPA, 1983a)
                                     -28-

-------
Leonard,  A., G.B. Gerber and P. Jacquet.   1981.   Carclnogenldty,  mutagenlc-



Hy and teratogenldty of nickel.   Mutat.  Res.   87(1):  1-15.







Leslie, A.C.D.,  J.W.  Winchester,  F.W.  Leysleffer and  M.S.  Ahlberg.   1976.



Prediction of health effects of pollution  aerosols.  In.: Trace  Substances  1n



Environmental Health -  X,  D.O.  Hemphlll,  Ed.   Univ.  Missouri,  Columbia, MO.



p. 497-504.  (Cited In U.S. EPA,  1983a)







Maenza, R.M., A.M.  Pradhan and F.W.  Sunderman,  Jr.   1971.  Rapid  Induction



of  sarcomas  1n  rats  by combination of nickel  sulflde and  3,4-benzypyrene.



Cancer Res.  31: 2067-2071.  (Cited 1n U.S. EPA,  1983a)







M1yak1, M., N.  Akamatsu, T. Ono and  H.  Koyama.   1979.   MutagenlcHy of  metal



cations In  cultured cells  from Chinese hamsters.  Mutat.  Res.   68:  259-263.



(Cited In U.S. EPA, 1985)







Morgan,  A.,  A.E.  Lally  and  A.  Holmes.    1973.   Some  observations  on  the



distribution of  trace  metals  1n  chrysotlle asbestos.  Ann.  Occup.  Hyg.   16:



231-240.   (Cited U.S.  EPA, 1983a)







NAS  (National   Academy  of  Sciences).   1975.   Nickel.   National Academy  of



Sciences  Committee  on Medical  and Biologic Effects  of  Environmental  Pollut-



ants.  Washington, DC.
                                     -29-

-------
NIOSH (National  Institute  for  Occupational  Safety and Health).   1977.   Cri-
teria  for  a   Recommended   Standard...Occupational   Exposure   to  Inorganic
Nickel.    DHEW  (NIOSH),  U.S.  Government  Printing  Office,  Washington,  DC.
Publ. No.  77-164.

Nlshioka,  H.   1975.   Mutagenlc  activities  of metal  compounds 1n  bacteria.
Mutat. Res.   31: 185-189.   (Cited in U.S.  EPA,  1985)

Nodiya,  P.I.   1972.   Cobalt  and nickel  balance 1n  students  of  an  occupa-
tional technical  school.   Gig.  Sanit.  37:  108-109.  (Cited  in U.S.  EPA,
1983a)

Nomoto,  S. and  F.W. Sunderman, Jr.   1970.   Atomic absorption  spectrometry  of
nickel In  serum,  urine  and  other  biological  materials.   CUn.  Chem.   16:
477-485.   (Cited in U.S.  EPA, 1983a)

Ottolenghi,  A.D.,  J.K.  Haseman,  W.W.  Payne, H.L.  Falk and H.N.  MacFarland.
1974.  Inhalation  studies  of  nickel  sulflde  1n  pulmonary  cardnogenesls  of
rats.  J.  Natl. Cancer Inst.   54: 1165-1172.  (Cited  in U.S. EPA,  1983b)

Page, G.W.  1981.  Comparison  of groundwater  and surface water for  patterns
and  levels  of  contamination  by  toxic substances.   Environ.  Sd.  Techno!.
15: 1475-1481.

Pedersen,  E.,  A.C. Hogetveit  and A. Andersen.   1973.  Cancer  of  respiratory
organs among  workers  at  a nickel refinery  in  Norway.  Int. J. Cancer.   12:
32-41.  (Cited in U.S. EPA, 1983a)
                                     -30-

-------
Pedersen,  E.,  A.  Andersen  and  H.  HogetveH.   1978.   Second  study of  the



Incidence and mortality of  cancer  of  respiratory workers at  a  nickel  refin-



ery.  Anna!. Clln.  Lab.  Scl.  8:  503-504.   (Cited In U.S.  EPA, 1983a)







Perry, H.M., Or. and E.F. Perry.  1959.   Normal  concentrations  of  some trace



metals 1n  human  urine:  Changes  produced  by  ethylened1am1netetraacetate.   J.



Clln Invest.  38: 1452-1463.  (Cited 1n U.S.  EPA, 1983a)







Prasad, C.M., K.C.  Nalr  and U.K. Sheth.  1980.   Reversal of  dlgoxln Induced



cardiac  arrhythmias  by   nickel  chloride.    Res.  Commun.   Chem.   Pathol.



Pharmacol.   27:  405-408.   (Cited  In  U.S. EPA, 1983a)







Roblson, S.H.  and  M.  Costa.   1982.    Induction  of DNA  strand breakage  by



nickel compounds In cultured Chinese hamster  ovary  cells.   Cancer  Lett.   15:



35-40.  (Cited In U.S.  EPA,  1985)







Roblson, S.H.,  0.  Cantonl  and  M.  Costa.   1982.  Strand  breakage and  de-



creased molecular  weight  of DNA Induced  by  specific metal  compounds.   Car-



dnogenesls.  3: 657-662.   (Cited In U.S.  EPA, 1985)







Schroeder,  H.A.  and M. MHchener.   1971.  Toxic  effects  of  trace  elements on



the  reproduction  of mice  and rats.   Arch.   Environ.  Health.  23:  102-106.



(Cited In U.S. EPA, 1985)







Schroeder,   H.A., M.  MHchener  and  A.P. Nason.   1974.   Life-term  effects  of



nickel  1n   rats:   Survival,  tumors,   Interactions  with  trace  elements  and



tissue levels.  J.  Nutr.   104:  239-243.  (Cited In U.S.  EPA, 1985)
                                     -31-

-------
Sunderman, F.W.,  Jr.   1977.   The metabolism and  toxicology  of nickel.   In.:
Clinical  Chemistry  and  Chemical   Toxicology   of   Metals,   S.S.   Brow,   Ed.
Elsevler, Amsterdam,   p. 231-259.   (Cited  1n  U.S.  EPA,  1983a)

Sunderman, F.W. and  A.J.  Donnelly.   1965.  Studies of nickel  cardnogenesls
metastaslzlng pulmonary tumors  1n  rats Induced by  the Inhalation of  nickel
carbonyl.  Am.  J.  Pathol.   46:  1027-1038.   (CHed  In U.S.  EPA,  1983a)

Sunderman, F.W.,  Jr. and  C.E.  Selln.   1968.   The metabolism of n1ckel-63
carbonyl.  Toxlcol.  Appl.  Pharmacol.   12:  207-218.    (CHed  1n  U.S. EPA,
1983a)

Sunderman, F.W.,  J.F.   K1nca1d,  A.J.  Donnelly  and  B. West.   1957.    Nickel
poisoning.  IV. Chronic exposure of  rats  to  nickel carbonyl:  A report after
one year  of  observation.  .Arch. Ind.  Health.   16:  480-485.    (CHed In U.S.
EPA, 1983a)

Sunderman, F.W.,  A.J.   Donnelly, B.  West  and  J.F. K1nca1d.   1959.    Nickel
poisoning.   IX.  Cardnogenesls  1n  rats  exposed  to nickel  carbonyl.  Arch.
Ind. Health.   20:  36-41.  (CHed 1n  U.S.  EPA,  1983a)

Sutherland, R.B.  1959.  Respiratory cancer mortality  1n  workers  employed  In
an Ontario nickel  refinery,  covering  the  period 1930-1057.   Report of Divi-
sion  of  Industrial  Hygiene,  Ontario  Dept.  of  Health, Toronto.   (CHed   1n
U.S. EPA, 1983a)
                                     -32-

-------
Tedeschl,  R.E.   and   F.W.   Sunderman.   1957.   Nickel  poisoning.   V.   The



metabolism of  nickel  under  normal  conditions and  after  exposure  to  nickel



carbonyl.  Arch. Ind.  Health.  16:  486-488.   (Cited in U.S.  EPA,  1983a)







Torjussen,  W.   and  I.   Andersen.    1979.   Nickel  concentrations  1n  nasal



mucosa,  plasma  and urine in active  and retired nickel workers.   Ann. Clin.



Lab. Sd.  9(4): 289-298.  (CHed in U.S.  EPA, 1983a)







Torjussen, W.,  L.A.   Solberg and A.C.  Hogetveit.   1979.   H1stopatholog1cal



changes  of  the nasal mucosa 1n active and  retired nickel  workers.   Br.  J.



Cancer.  40(4): 568-580.  (Cited 1n U.S. EPA, 1983a)







U.S.  EPA.   1980a.   Guidelines  and  Methodology  Used  1n  the  Preparation  of



Health  Effects  Assessment   Chapters  of  the  Consent  Decree  Water  Quality



Criteria.  Federal Register.  45:79347-79357.  .







U.S.  EPA.   1980b.  Ambient  Water  Quality Criteria for Nickel,  with  Errata



for  Ambient  Water Quality  Criteria Documents dated  June 9,  1981  (Updated:



February  23,  1982).    Environmental  Criteria  and  Assessment Office,  Cin-



cinnati, OH.  EPA  440/5-80-060.  NTIS PB 81-11715.







U.S.  EPA.   1983a.  Health  Assessment  Document  for  Nickel.   Environmental



Criteria  and  Assessment Office,  Research  Triangle   Park,  NC.    EPA  600/8-



83-012A.  NTIS  PB  83-213827.
                                     -33-

-------
U.S. EPA.  1983b.  Reportable Quantity for  Nickel  (and  Compounds).   Prepared
by  the  Environmental  Criteria  and Assessment  Office,  Cincinnati,   OH,  OHEA
for the Office of Solid  Waste and Emergency Response,  Washington,  DC.

U.S. EPA.  1983c.  Methodology and Guidelines  for  Reportable  Quantity Deter-
minations  Based  on Chronic  Toxldty  Data.   Prepared  by the  Environmental
Criteria and Assessment Office, Cincinnati, OH, OHEA  for  the  Office of Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, Washington,  DC.

U.S. EPA.  1985.   Drinking Water  Criteria Document for Nickel.   Prepared  by
the  Environmental  Criteria  and Assessment  Office,  Cincinnati,  OH,  OHEA  for
the Office of Drinking Water, Washington,  DC.   (Final  draft)

Waltschewa, V.W.,  et  al.,  1972.   Hodenveranderugen be1 welssen Ratten durch
chronlsche  Verabrelchung  von  Nickel   sulfate.   (Testlcular  changes  due  to
long-term administration of nickel sulphate 1n  rats.)   Exp. Pathol.   6:  116.
(Ger. with Eng. abstr.)   (Cited 1n U.S. EPA, 1980b; 1983b)

Wehner,  A.P.   1974.   Investigation of Cocardnogenlclty  of Asbestos, Cobalt
Oxide,  Nickel  Oxide,  D1ethyln1trosam1ne  and  Cigarette Smoke.  Final Report
to  the  NCI, Rlchland, WA, Battelle Pacific  Northwest  Laboratories.   Contract
PH 43-68-1372.  (Cited 1n IARC, 1976)

Wehner,  A.P.  and O.K.  Craig.   1972.   Toxicology  of  Inhaled  N10  and  CoO  1n
Syrian  golden  hamsters.  Am.  Ind.  Hyg.   Assoc.  J.   33:  147-155.    (Cited  1n
U.S. EPA, 1983a)
                                     -34-

-------
Wehner, A.P., R.H. Busch, R.J. Olson and  O.K.  Craig.   1975.   Chronic Inhala-



tion of nickel  oxide  and cigarette smoke by hamsters.   Am.  Ind.  Hyg.  Assoc.



J.  36: 801-810.  (Cited in IARC,  1976)







Welscher,  C.H., H. Oldises, 0. Hochralner and  W.  Koerdel.   1980.   Subchronlc



effects Induced by nickel-monoxide Inhalation  1n  Wlstar  rats.   Dev.  Toxlcol.



Environ. Sci.  8:  555-558.   (Cited 1n U.S. EPA, 1983b)







Whanger,  P.O.   1973.    Effects  of dietary  nickel on  enzyme activities  and



mineral content in rats.  Toxicol. Appl.  Pharmacol.  25:  323-331.   (Cited in



U.S. EPA,  1983a)







Wulf,  H.C.   1980.   Sister chromatld  exchanges 1n human  lymphocytes  exposed



to  nickel  and  lead.   Danish  Med.  Bull.   27:  40-42.    (Cited  in U.S.  EPA,



1983a)
                                     -35-

-------
                                                      APPENDIX

                                              Summary Table for Nickel
Carcinogenic
Potency
Inhalation


Oral
Species Experimental
Dose/Exposure
human 20-25 mg/m3
occupational


Effect

nasal, laryngeal
and lung tumors


qi* Reference

1.2 (ing/kg/day)'1 Doll et al., 1977;
Pederson et al., 1975;
U.S. EPA, 1983a
ND
I
CO
       Route
                 Species
       AIC
                  rat
Inhalation
 Experimental
Dose/Exposure
Effect
6 weeks (0.
10, 50, 100
mg/kg bw/day)

0, 100, 1000,
2500 ppm diet/
2 years (0, 5,
50, 125 mg/kg
bw/day)
body weight,
hematologlcal
changes

decreased
body weight
at 50 mg/kg
                                           Acceptable Intake
                                             (AIS or AIC)
                                           Reference
Oral
AIS


rat 0, 100,
1000 ppr

500,
n diet/

>50 mg/kg
decreased

1.4 mg/day


Whanger, 1973

                                           0.7 mg/day
                                                                              ND
                                      Ambrose
                                      et al., 1976
     ND  =  Not  derived

-------