EPA/540/2-89/036
      SUPERFUNDTREATABILITY
             CLEARINGHOUSE
                Document Reference:
Shirco Infrared Systems Portable Test Unit "Final Report Demonstration Test On-Site
 PCB Destruction, Shirco Infrared Portable Unit at Florida Steel Indiantown Mill Site,
 Indiantown, Florida." Technical report of approximately 180 pp. prepared for internal
                use by Shirco. September 1986.
               EPA LIBRARY NUMBER:

            Superfund Treatability Clearinghouse - EZZC

-------
                SUPERFUND TREATABILITT CLEARINGHOUSE ABSTRACT
 Treatment Process:

 Media:

 Document Reference:
 Document  Type:

 Contact:
Thermal Treatment - Infrared

Sludge

Shirco Infrared Systems Portable Test Unit.   "Final
Report - Demonstration Test On-Site PCB
Destruction, Shirco Infrared Portable Unit at
Florida Steel Indiantown Mill Site, Indiantown,
Florida."  Technical report of approximately 180
pp. prepared for internal use by Shirco.   September
1986.

Contractor/Vendor Treatability Study
John Kroske
U.S. EPA - Region IV
345 Courtland Street,
Atlanta, GA 30336
                                              NE
 Site  Name:
 Location  of Test:
Florida Steel Indiantown Mill Site,  FL (NPL)

Shirco, Joplin,  MO
BACKGROUND: This  document  reports on  the results of a Florida Steel
Corporation study to  develop and evaluate cleanup alternatives  for onsite
treatment  of  PCB  contaminated soils.  The results of this study aided  in
the  selection of  an approach to remediate the site.  Demonstration tests on
incinerating  PCBs were  conducted at the site May 13-15, 1986 by Shirco
Infrared Systems  of Dallas, Texas.  The purpose of the  tests was  to demon-
strate  the capability of the Shirco System to meet the  requirements  of 40
CFR  Part 761  while detoxifying the soil.
OPERATIONAL INFORMATION;   Soils at the Florida Steel Corporation  Site  were
contaminated  with PCBs  in  the concentration range of 76 to 2970 ppm.   The
report  does not provide any specific  details on the amount of site soil
contaminated, or  the  types of soils undergoing treatment.  The  Shirco  Port-
able Pilot Test Unit  used  in the tests is a three stage system; infrared
furnace, propane  fired afterburner, and scrubber.  The waste materials are
weighed in batches and placed on a conveyer belt which  feeds the  material
to the  furnace.   The  soil  is heated in the infrared furnace for a minimum
residence  time of 15  to 25 minutes, soil/ash is discharged and  the exhaust
gas passes into the propane-fired afterburner.  The afterburner operates at
temperatures  from 1900 to  2200°F.  Minimum afterburner residence  time  is
two seconds.  The afterburner exhaust gases are analyzed for various
contaminants  associated with PCB degradation products, as required by  40
CFR 761.  Additionally the afterburner exhaust is continuously monitored
for Ojt CQj,  CO and NO  levels.   A QA/QC plan is contained in  this report.
PERFORMANCE!  Six tests were conducted to determine the Destruction Removal
Efficiencies  (DRE) for PCBs.  In four of six tests the DRE of 99.9999% was
achieved.   The remaining two test achieved a slightly lower DRE than
required;  99.999  and  99.998.  The author believes this was due  in one
3/89-23                                              Document Number:  EZZC

   NOTE:  Quality assurance of data may not be appropriate for all uses.

-------
 instance to low concentrations of PCB in the waste feed stream,  and in the
 second instance, to a low level of excess O™.  This low excess 0« level
 indicates that for the Shirco unit the minimum permissible CL  level in the
 afterburner exhaust should be increased from that level used in the pro-
 gram.  The tests that met the ORE had afterburner 02  from 9 to 13%.  Test
 five, the low PCB ORE test,  had an 02 concentration of 6.9%.  Concentra-
 tions of particulates in the flue gas were well within the limit of 0.08
 gr/scf.  HCl emissions for each test were less than A Ibs/hr.  Also,
 scrubber effluent and flue gases were analyzed for dioxins and furon in one
 test run.  None were found within detection limits.

 CONTAMINANTS:

 Analytical data is provided  in the treatability study report.  The
 breakdown of the contaminants by treatability group is:

 Treatability Group             CAS Number        Contaminants

 W02-Dioxins/Furans/PCBs        APCB              Monochlorobiphenyl
                                BPCB              Dichlorobiphenyl
                                CPCB              Trichlorobiphenyl
                                DPCB              Tetrachlorobiphenyl
                                EPCB              Pentachlorobiphenyl
                                FPCB              Hexachlorobiphenyl
3/89-23                                              Document  Number:   EZZC
   NOTE:  Quality assurance of data may not be appropriate  for all uses.

-------
j                                     FINAL REPORT


i



                                  DEMONSTRATION  TEST






                               ON-SITE PCB DESTRUCTION
I

f


                            SHIRCO INFRARED PORTABLE UNIT

i




                                          AT


j


»                          FLORIDA STEEL INDIANTOWN MILL SITE



!
I


                                 INDIANTOWN,  FLORIDA
                                REPORT NUMBER 821-86-1





                                  SEPTEMBER 17,  1986

-------
                                  TABLE OF CONTENTS


          I.  Summary
i
j          II.  Process Operation

•               A.  General
               B.  Operation During the Test
J                   1.  Feed
                   2.  Temperature
                   3.  Residence Time
                   4.  Pressure
                   5.  Scrubber
                   6.  Combustion Gas
                   7.  Power Usage - Primary Chamber
                   8.  Fuel Consumption - Secondary Chamber
,               C.  Deviation From Test Plan

•          III.  Sampling and Monitoring Procedures

               A.  Process Monitoring
               B.  Process Sampling
                   1.  Waste Feed
                   2.  Ash
                   3.  Scrubber Effluent
                   4.  Afterburner Exhaust and Exhaust Stack

                       a.  Afterburner Exhaust - O,, CO, CO,, and NOX
                       b.  Exhaust Stack - PCBs. PCDDs,and PCDFs
                       c.  Exhaust Stack - Particulates and HC1
                       d.  Exhaust Stack - Total Chlorinated Organics

          IV.  Analytical Procedures

               A.  Haste Feed and Ash Samples
               B.  Scrubber Effluent
               C.  Flue Gas Samples
                   1.  Modified Method 5 Train
                   2.  Method 5 Train
                   3.  Total Chlorinated Organic

          V.   Test Results

               A.  Solid and Liquid Process Streams

                   1.  Waste Feed
                   2.  Ash
                   3.  Scrubber Effluent

-------
     B.  Flue Gas

         1.  Particulates
         2.  Total Organic Halogens
         3.  Continuous Monitoring
         4.  PCB's

     C.  Performance Results

     D.  PCDD's and PCDF's

VI.  Quality Assurance

     A.  Sampling Apparatus
     B.  Quality Control Samples
     C.  Chain of Custody

VII.  Closure

     Appendix A:  Operating Log
     Appendix B:  Material Feed Log
     Appendix C:  Testing and Analysis Report
                            ii

-------
          I.  SUMMARY

J               The Florida Steel Corporation is conducting a feasibility
               study to develop and evaluate various alternatives for on-
I               site treatment of PCB-contaminated soils discovered at their
I               Indiantown, Florida mill site.  The purpose of the study is
               to aid in selection of a method to cleanup the site.  As
,               part of this study, a demonstration test was conducted at
j               the site on May 13-15, 1986 by Shirco Infrared Systems of
J               Dallas Texas.  The purpose of the test was to demonstrate
               the capability of the Shirco Infrared technology to detoxify
               the soil and meet all the requirements of 40 CFR Part 761.

               The project manager for the demonstration test was Mr.
               George H. Hay of Shirco.  Mr. Hay had ultimate
               responsibility and authority for coordination and conduct of
               the program.  Site preparation was coordinated between and
               conducted by Shirco and Florida Steel personnel.  Shirco
               provided the portable test unit and personnel for its
               operation.  Florida Steel provided support for site
               preparation, site utilities and personnel to aid in waste
               material mixing.  Field sampling was directed by Mr. Mark
               Mccabe of Remediation Technologies Inc. of Concord, MA
               (RETEC).  The sampling and process stream monitoring was
               performed by TRC Corp.  The ENSECO laboratory, located in
               Cambridge, Massachusetts, was responsible for performing the
               analytical analysis of the various incinerator stream
               samples.  The QA officer was Mr. Mark McCabe.
               Representatives of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
               Region IV monitored the test.

               The demonstration test consisted of six tests.  Emissions
               sampling was performing during  five of those tests.  The
               test was performed in accordance with the Permit Application
               and Demonstration Test Plan except for some very minor
               deviations.  Three soil mixes, with different levels of
               contaminants representative of the material stored at the
               site, were used.  Incinerator operating parameters which
               were varied included soil residence time and temperature of
               the afterburner.

               Table 1-1 is a summary of results for the demonstration
               test.  The test was performed in accordance with
               requirements of the Toxic Substances Control Act given in 40
               CFR Part 761 and the Permit Application.

               The contaminated material processed contained from 76 to
               2970 parts per million PCBs.  PCBs were not detected  in the
               processed soil at the analytical detection limit of 3-4
               parts per billion.  This shows that the portable unit,  when
               operated within the scope of the permit, can be used  to
               decontaminated this and similarly contaminated materials.

-------
Analysis of the scrubber effluent showed it contained no
PCBs at the detection limit of 0.34 parts per billion.

PCBs were not detected in the flue gas samples of four of
the five tests sampled.  Due to time constraints, flue gas
measurements were not conducted during test 4.  The process
condition associated with this test are not "worst case" and
should not result in air emissions in excess of the other
monitored tests.  Analytical detection limits of 0.3-1.7
ug/or were adequate to demonstrate destruction and removal
efficiencies (DRE) of greater than 99.9999% in three of
these tests.  In the case of test 1, due to the lack of
analytical sensitivity and the unexpectedly low
concentrations of PCBs in the waste, a DRE of only >99.999
can be shown.

PCBs were detected in the flue gas sample from test 5 at a
concentration of 2.4 ug/m.  The presence of these species
in the flue gas stream is the result of a low secondary
combustion chamber oxygen level which is discussed in detail
in this report.

Fixed gases were monitored continuously during the tests.
The combustion efficiencies for all tests were greater than
99.9  percent as required by 40 CFR Part 761.70.
Particulate concentrations were measured and ranged from
0.015 to 0.055 gr/dscf.  These values meet the requirement
of 0.08 gr/dscf maximum as specified in the regulations.
Hydrochloric Acid emissions for each test were less than 4
pounds/hour.

The ash, scrubber effluent, and flue gas samples from test 6
were analyzed for dioxins and furans.  None were found
within detection limits.

-------
                    TABLE 1-1
            DEMONSTRATION TEST SUMMARY
5-13-86
  1400
  1705
150336

    15

  1531
TEST
DATE
TIME TEST BEGUN
TIME TEST ENDED
OPERATING PARAMETERS:
 Furnace:
  Process Power Rate
   (BTU/hr)
  Average Residence
   Time (min.)
  Average Process
   Temp. (°F)
 Afterburner:
  Propane Fuel Rate
   (BTU/hr)
  Avg.Process Temp.( F)
  Avg.Comb.Air (ACFM)
  Avg.Oxygen (%)
  Avg.Carbon Dioxide(%)
  Avg.Carbon Monoxide(PPM)12.50
  Combustion Efficiency(%)99.99
Particulate/HCL Emissions:
  Sample Time (min.)
  Stack Flow Rate (DSCFM)
  Particulate Conc.@7%09
    (gr/dscf)
  HCL (mg/hr)
PCB's
 Haste Feed Rate (Ib/hr)
  PCB Cone.  (PPM)
  PCB Feed Rate (g/h)
  Incinerator Ash
   PCB Cone, (ug/kg)
  Scrubber Effluent
   Composite - PCB
   Cone, (ug/kg)          	
  Flue Gas Flow Rate
                           92.75
                         O14.34
                         < 29.16
 < 2.4
 PCB Cone.(ng/mJ)
 PCB Output  (ug/hr)
Destruction and
Removal (%)
                                    5-14-86
                                      1010
                                      1253
                                    150363

                                        25

                                      1603
                                     < 2.6
            114.94
           <709.73
           < 81.60
5-14-86
  1253
  1650
152764

    25

  1573
183073
2015
117
8.96
8.65
[)12.50
)99.99
1*
•
129
55
0.015
< 181
115.4
76
3.98
215075
2177
135
12.90
8.67
26.60
99.97


60
68
0.055
< 136
61.5
2790
77.83
136326
1993
70
8.58
9.78
10.60
99.99


94
33
0.023
< 45.3
61.5
2560
71.41
 < 3.4
                                                < 0.34

                                                 55.93
                                               <946.16
                                               < 52.90
   4
5-14-86
  1650
  1760
    15

  1523
                         >99.999*   >99.9999   >99.99992
 < 2.6
              NA
              NA
              NA

              NA
   5
5-15-86
  0930
  1305
133107   141549
    15

  1610
123653
2007
—
9.63
9.13
7.47
99.97
_
NA
NA
NA
32.0
2970
43.11
202056
1980
115
6.90
10.30
3.35
99.99
130
53
0.037
< 408
106.4
400
19.30
 < 2.6
           88.22
         2416.32
          213.20
                                                                                 6
                                                                              5-15-86
                                                                                1318
                                                                                1620
                                                                              155965

                                                                                  15

                                                                                1471
                                                                              126253
                                                                                1883
                                                                                  64
                                                                                9.49
                                                                                9.22
                                                                                2.40
                                                                               99.99

                                                                                  51
                                                                                  31

                                                                               0.017
                                                                              <  227

                                                                                79.8
                                                                                2840
                                                                              102.80

                                                                               < 2.6
               51.36
            <1719.47
            <  88.31
* Required DRE Not Met Due to Limited Analytical Detection Limit
**Low DRE is due to periods of operation with secondary chamber oxygen levels
  ~.~«,«•<«-4    - - -
                                           >99.9989    >99.99991

                                                     approaching the permit

-------
          II.  PROCESS OPERATION

               A.  General
I
The Shirco Portable Pilot Test Unit is a three stage
system - infrared furnace, propane fired afterburner,
and scrubber - enclosed in a 45 foot van trailer.   A
flow diagram of the process is given as Figure II-l.
                   The operation of the infrared incineration system is
                   described in detail in the Permit Application and
i                   Demonstration Test Plan submitted to U.S. EPA on April
I                   11, 1986.

i                   The waste material was weighed in batches in buckets and
}                   was manually placed on a metering belt conveyor which
                   fed the material to the furnace.  The conveyor is
.                   equipped with an adjustable gate which can be used to
                   regulate and distribute the feed.

                   The speed of the conveyor in the furnace was set to
;                   provide the desired residence time.  Power input to the
                   infrared heating elements was regulated to provide the
                   desired furnace temperature.  The flow rate and
                   locations of introduction of combustion air were
                   adjusted to regulate the rate of combustion throughout
                   the length of the furnace.  Soil/ash was discharged from
,                   the furnace by a sealed screw conveyor.  The furnace
i                   exhaust gases (combustion products and any remaining
i                   combustible gases) were routed to the afterburner.

!                   The afterburner is equipped with a manually-controlled
I                   propane burner.  The firing rate of this burner was
                   adjusted to maintain the desired chamber temperature.
                   Combustion air was added to the afterburner, as needed,
                   to oxidize combustibles in the furnace exhaust.

                   The afterburner exhaust gases were routed to the
                   scrubber.  Those exhaust gases were continuously sampled
                   and analyzed for oxygen, carbon monoxide, carbon
                   dioxide, and oxides of nitrogen concentrations.

                   The scrubber system consists of a venturi scrubber and
                   droplet separator tower.  The purpose of this system was
                   to remove particulates from and to cool the gas stream.
                   Hater was manually added as needed to replace that
                   discharged out the exhaust stack.

                   An operating log of process parameters was maintained
                   during the operations.  A copy of that log is given as
                   Appendix A.

-------
B.  Operation During The Test

    The test program was designed to evaluate the effects of
    various operating conditions and waste feed
    characteristics on overall system performance.   The
    primary factors which affect combustion efficiency and
    waste destruction are temperature, residence time,
    oxygen concentration and the rate and degree of air-
    waste mixing achieved.  Six tests were performed in this
    program.  A summary of the operating parameters is given
    in Table II-l.

    1.  Feed

        The waste at the Indiantown Mill site consists of
        soils contaminated with polychlorinated biphenyls
        (PCB).  The source of the PCB contamination has been
        attributed to the use of hydraulic fluid containing
        PCBs in the billet shearing system.  Leaks in this
        system allowed the release of hydraulic fluid to the
        surrounding soils.

        The contaminated soils have been excavated and are
        stored in a ground level vault.  Representative
        samples of the contaminated soils have been stored
        in 55-gallon drums at the site.  Material from three
        (3) of those drums, designated mixes 1,2,and 3, were
        selected for processing in this program.

        All tests except numbers 1 and 5 were performed with
        mix 1 which has the highest concentration of PCB.
        Tests 1 and 5 were performed with mixes 2 and 3,
        respectively, which contained different
        concentrations of organic constituents.

        Feed rate to the furnace is controlled by the
        metering belt speed setting and the width of the
        metering gate setting.  For this program, the gate
        setting remained constant to give a one inch (1")
        bed depth; therefore, feed rate was dependent upon
        the belt speed and other factors such as density of
        the feed.  A log of the feed is given as Appendix B.

    2.  Temperatures

        In previous programs, detoxification of creosote and
        pentachlorophenol- laden wastes was achieved using a
        maximum furnace temperature of 1600°F.  Destruction
        and removal efficiencies (ORE) in compliance with
        RCRA were obtained with afterburner temperatures of
        1800 to 2200°F.

-------
    For this program, the operating temperature of the
    furnace was anticipated to be 1650°F.   Actual
    operating temperatures were below that level because
    the auxiliary energy requirements exceeded the
    capacity of the power supply to the electrical
    heating elements.  The temperature of the
    afterburner was varied from 1900 to 2200°F to
    determine the effect of different temperature levels
    on destruction effectiveness for these specific
    wastes.

3.  Residence Time

    Material residence time in both the furnace and
    afterburner must be adequate to allow heat and mass
    transfer and oxidation to occur.  The results of
    tests in previous programs were used as guidelines
    to establish operating conditions for this program.

    Residence time of the solid phase in the furnace was
    established by adjustment of the belt speed.  Two
    residence times were used - fifteen and twenty-five
    minutes.

    Residence time in the afterburner could not be
    independently adjusted but was a function of gas
    flow from the furnace, the burner firing rate, the
    excess air rate in the afterburner and the
    afterburner temperature.  The minimum afterburner
    residence time planned for this program was 2.0
    seconds.

4.  Pressures

    Both the furnace and afterburner were operated at
    slightly negative pressures to prevent fugitive
    emission of contaminants.  The chamber pressures
    were adjusted by manually-operated dampers.

5.  Scrubber

    Adequate scrubber water flow rates were maintained
    to remove particulate matter from and reduce the
    temperature of the gas stream.  The flow rates were
    not measured directly but were estimated from the
    published spray nozzle capacities and measured
    nozzle pressure drops.  The stack temperature was
    maintained at approximately 175°F.  Make-up water
    was added to the scrubber reservoir as needed on a
    periodic basis.

-------
                   6.  Combustion Air

i                       The most basic requirement of any combustion system
                       is a sufficient supply of air to completely oxidize
|                       the combustible portion of the feed.  For this
{                       system, combustion air was added to both the furnace
                       and afterburner.  In general, the residual oxygen
,                       concentration in the exhaust gas should exceed two
!                       percent (2%) to insure adequate oxygen/combustible
1                       material contact in the afterburner.  For this
                       program, the excess oxygen level was maintained
                       above 3 percent, carbon monoxide level was
                       maintained at less than 50 ppm, and calculated
                       combustion efficiency was maintained greater than
!                       99.9 percent.

                   7.  Power Usage - Furnace

                       Input power to each of the temperature control zones
                       was measured by energy totalizers.  The totalizers
                       were read and recorded in the operating log, which
                       is given as Appendix A, at nominal 30 minute
                       intervals.  The readings are plotted as Figure II-2.
                       Those graphs permit determination of the readings at
                       the beginning and end of each run and, by
                       difference, the total energy consumption and average
                       power requirements.  The average power requirements
                       are given in Table II-l.

                       It should be noted that power usage efficiency of
                       the portable unit is much smaller than that of
                       larger units because of the ratio of heat loss
,                       surface area to effective belt surface area.
                       Because of that the specific power consumption data
                       presented here should not be used to estimate power
                       required to decontaminate such soils in a full-scale
                       system.  These data are given for information only.

                   8.  Fuel Consumption - Afterburner

                       Propane fuel for the burner in the afterburner was
                       obtained from bottles.  The bottles were weighed and
                       the weights recorded in the operating log, which is
                       given as Appendix A, at periodic intervals during
-,-                      each run.  Those readings are plotted as Figure II-
                       3.  The graphs permit determination of the bottle
'                       weights at the beginning and end of each run and, by
                       difference, the total energy consumption and average
"                       energy requirements.  The average energy
                       requirements are given in Table II-l.

-------
                                                        8
        The efficiency situation that exists for the furnace
        isf also, applicable to the afterburner and this
        data should not be used to estimate fuel
        requirements for a full scale unit.

C.  Deviation(s) From Test Plan

    There were no upsets, shutdowns, or other deviations
    from normal operations.  The equipment performed well
    and satisfactory process control was maintained
    throughout the tests.

    The order of processing the waste mixes was changed from
    that noted in the permit application.  The test matrix
    in the application states that the first test would be
    performed with feed mix 1 which contains 4889 ppm PCB.
    At the beginning of the test program approval had been
    received to process waste which contained no more than
    2000 ppm PCB, so the test matrix was rearranged to delay
    processing of mix 1 until proper approval was received.
    This change had no effect on the operation or results of
    the test program.

-------
                                             TABLE II-l
                                        OPERATING PARAMETERS
TEST
DATE
TIME TEST BEGUN
TIME TEST ENDED

WASTE FEED:
  Mix Number
  Feed Rate (Ib/hr)
  Total Feed  (Ib)
  Furnace Belt Speed
    (ft/hr)
  Solid Phase Residence
    Tine (nin)
PROCESS TEMPERATURES:
  Feed Discharge  (°F)
  Furnace Zone A  ( F)
  Furnace Zone B  ( F)
  Furnace Exhaust  (°F)
  Afterburner (°F)
  Stack (°F)
   1
5-13-86
  1400
  1705
      2
  115.4
  355.5

   22.2

     15
    241
   1539
   1561
   1337
   2019
    174
Furnace Draft  (in H,O)    -0.006
Afterburner Draft (In H2O)-0.150

SCRUBBER:
  Venturi Pressure Drop
    (in.H20)                 7.8
  Venturi Water Flow(gpn)    2.8
  Tower Water  Flow (gpn)    11.8
STACK EXHAUST:
  Average Velocity  (AFPM)
  Flow Volume  (DSCFM)
  Avg.CO Concentration(ppn) 12.5
  Avg.CO2 Concentration  (%)  8.6
  Avg.O2 Concentration (%)
   2385
     55
    9.0
PROCESS ENERGY REQUIREMENTS:
  Furnace (KW)             44.05
     (BTU/lb feed)          1303
  Afterburner (BTU/hr)    183073
     (BTU/lb feed)           515
5-14-86
  1010
  1253
      1
   61.5
  167.1

   13.3

     25
    212
   1625
   1607
   1442
   2196
    175

 •0.019
 •0.182
               3.0
               2.8
               5.8
   2761
     68
   26.6
    8.7
   12.2
             44.06
              2444
            215075
              1287
5-14-86
  1253
  1650
      1
   61.5
  242.9

   13.3

     25
    158
   1582
   1572
   1444
   2006
    171

  •0.005
  •0.035
               3.3
               2.8
               5.4
   1424
     33
   10.6
    9.8
    8.6
             44.76
              2483
            136326
               561
5-14-86
  1650
  1750
      1
   32.0
     32

   22.2

     15
                3.0
                3.0
                5.4
   5
5-15-86
  0930
  1305
      3
  106.4
  381.3

   22.2

     15
173
1524
1503
1377
1990
174
0.007
0.050
244
1614
1598
1551
1989
177
-0.018
-0.175
              39.00
               4158
             123653
               3864
             3.0
             2.8
             4.4
            2339
              53
             3.4
            10.3
             6.9
           41.56
            1332
          202056
             530
   6
5-15-86
  1318
  1620
      1
   79.8
  241.3

   22.2

     15
                         157
                        1521
                        1498
                        1398
                        1900
                         176

                      •0.024
                      •0.128
                3.4
                2.9
                4.4
               1299
                 31
                2.4
                9.2
                9.5
              45.70
               1960
             126253
                523

-------
Waste
Feed
Belt J
Feeder C

Combustion
Infrared /|ir Primarv Uni
Elejnents 1 Exhaust
''Intrr




Propa
Burne
1 ^Belt
Solid Prop
Product an
Combu
Ai
ne
r ~"%
' D
t
/""Generators
o'
°£
<
«
T
Combust ion
Air
ane
d
st ion
r
>ample
>tream
1
V
5

r
A
ZjA t:
Sample «_
Port


.Hr
Cool ina Water i

Make-up
Water
enturi Separator
>c rubber Tower
                                                                                                        Stack
Primary Chamber
Secondary Chamber
Emission Control  System     Exhaust Fan
                                        FIGURE  M-l
                                    Process  Flow Diagram

-------
                         Atfd
00^91
00 = 01
                                                                                  i?
                                                                                 f.
                                                                                 a


                                                                                 u
                                                                                 ro
                                                                                 U)

-------
  00 = 91
    AVQ JO 3Wli

00:«7l
                                        00:2l
00 = 01
3^
                                                                      SSE



                            >rtr


                                                                          10
                                                                           3-
                                                                           0)
                                                                           -o
                                                                           O
                                                                           c
                                                                           3
                                                                           Q.
                                                                           I/I
                                                                                  OJ
                                                                                  ro
                                                                                  w

-------
                                                             13
III.  SAMPLING AND MONITORING PROCEDURES

     A.  Process Monitoring

         The Shirco Portable Test Unit is instrumented to
         continuously monitor and record (via strip chart
         recorder) process temperatures at the following six (6)
         locations:

         Feed
         Primary furnace mid zone A
         Primary furnace mid zone B
         Primary furnace exhaust gas
         Afterburner
         Stack

         Copies of the recorder charts of the periods of
         operation are given as Figures III-l, III-2, III-3.

         In addition, the following process parameters were
         monitored via gauges and recorded at nominal 30 minute
         intervals throughout the test program:

         Scrubber venturi differential pressure
         Scrubber venturi water pressure
         Separator - tower water pressure
         Primary furnace draft
         Afterburner draft

     B.  Process Sampling

         Sampling of the process was performed at five locations
         - waste feed hopper, ash hopper, scrubber effluent,
         afterburner exhaust duct and exhaust stack.  A complete
         set of samples was obtained each test except exhaust
         stack samples were not taken for test Number 4.  A
         summary of the number and types of samples collected is
         given as Table III-l.  Details of the procedures and
         equipment used are given in the Appendix C Part 3.

         1.  Waste Feed

             A grab sampling procedure was used to obtain a
             representative, time-averaged sample of the waste
             feed for each test.  As described earlier, feed was
             introduced via five gallon buckets.  A 50-100 ml
             sample was obtained from each bucket as use of it
             was begun.  These were composited in a one (1) liter
             wide mouth amber glass jar with teflon lined cap.

-------
                                                    14
2.  Ash

    A grab sampling procedure was used to obtain a
    representative, time-averaged sample of the ash.
    The Portable Test Unit is equipped with an ash
    sampling drawer located in the ash discharge chute.
    A portion of the ash which drops off the furnace
    belt into the ash discharge hopper is captured in
    the sampling drawer.  The sampling drawer has a
    capacity of approximately 50 ml. This drawer was
    emptied periodically during each test and composited
    in a 500 ml wide mouth amber glass jar with a teflon
    lined cap.

3.  Scrubber Effluent

    The scrubber was operated in a recirculation mode
    and make-up water added throughout the day as
    needed.  At the end of each days operation, the
    scrubber sump was drained and a sample was taken in
    a one (1) liter glass jar with a teflon lined cap.

4.  Afterburner Exhaust and Exhaust Stack

    The rules which implement the TSCA and which are
    contained in 40 CFR Part 761 specify that the
    following parameters must be monitored during a PCS
    trial burn:

    Oxygen (O2)
    Carbon Monoxide (CO)
    Oxides of Nitrogen (MOX)
    Hydrochloric Acid (HC1)
    Total Chlorinated Organic Content (RCL)
    PCBs
    Total Particulate Matter

    a.  Afterburner Exhaust - O2/ CO, CO2 and MOX

        A continuous system was used to monitor flue gas
        carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, oxygen, and
        oxides of nitrogen levels.  The continuous
        monitoring system used consists of a sample gas
        conditioning system, gas analyzers, and a data
        acquisition/recording system.

-------
                                                                       15
                       b.  Exhaust Stack - PCBs, PCDDs and PCDFs

                           A modified EPA Method 5 train was used to sample
                           for organics.  A schematic of the train is given
|                           in Appendix C, Part 3.1.2.  Sampling was
                           isokinetically from a single point in the stack.
                           Sampling times were such that any contaminants
,                           present would be collected in concentrations
                           that would permit analysis.  Recovery resulted
                           in four samples from each run which were sealed
                           for transport to the laboratory.  Those samples
1                           were : (1) front half rinse,  (2) the particulate
                           filter, (3) XAD-2 resin sorbent module, and  (4)
                           condensate plus back half rinse.
i
                       c.  Exhaust Stack - Particulates and HC1

                           A Method 5 train was used.  Sampling was
'                           isokinetically from a single point in the stack.
                           Sampling times were approximately one hour.
                           Recovery resulted in four samples from each test
1                           which were sealed for transport to the
                           laboratory.  Those samples were :(1) front half
                           rinse, (2) particulate filter,  (3) water from
                           impingers one and three, and  (4) IN NaOH from
                           impinger two.

                       d.  Exhaust Stack - Total Chlorinated Organics

                           A series of two sorbent tubes containing
                           activated carbon were used to trap sorbents for
                           later determination of total organic halide
                           (TOX) emissions by the use of EPA method 450.1.
                           Flue gas was pumped through the filters at a
                           calibrated rate for a set time.  At the end of
                           the test, the sorbent tubes were capped for
                           transport to the laboratory.
i

-------
inf.
-p n U68Sir ir-M 1""O ^r "-7 7
                     i^' *
                     Figure  I I 1-1



              TEMPERATURE  RECORDER CHART


                     May  13,  1986

-------
I/C9CI09 °N
                                                                                                             /•>«
                                                    Figure I 11-2
                                            TEMPERATURE RECORDER CHART
                                                   May  1*»,  1986

-------
Or'0 n t ."
                                                    <>r j  •" ID /'•
       Figure I I 1-3
TEMPERATURE  RECORDER CHART
       May  15, 1986
                                co

-------
                                                             19
Waste Feed

Sampling Location:

Number of Samples
per test:



Incinerator Ash

Sampling Location:
Number of Samples
per test:
                           TABLE III-l

                         SAMPLING SUMMARY



                     Incinerator feed hopper.

                     Grab samples of approximately 50-100 ml
                     each, composited into a 1 liter amber glass
                     jar with Teflon lined cap, were collected
                     from each bucket of feed.
Ash sampling drawer located at entrance to
ash discharge chute.

Grab samples of approximately 50 ml each
were collected, periodically, during each
test and composited into a 500 ml amber
glass jar with a teflon lined cap.
Scrubber Effluent

Sampling Location:

Number of Samples
per Test:

Flue Gas

Sampling Location:
Number and types
of samples
Scrubber slurry recirculation tank drain.

A one liter sample was taken in an amber
glass jar at the end of each days operation.
(1) Sampling port on 4" diameter stack
(2) Sampling port on afterburner exhaust
    duct

(1) A modified Method 5 train for collection
    of PCBs each test.
(2) A Method 5 train for collection of
    particulates and HC1 each test.
(3) Continuous monitoring for CO, 02, CO2,
    and NOV

-------
                                                                       20
          IV. ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES

i               The laboratory analysis was performed by ERCO/A Division of
               ENSECO as directed by RETEC.  The procedures used are given
               in RETEC's report which is given at Appendix C, Part 3.

               A.  Waste Feed and Ash Samples

I                   The samples were prepared by solvent extraction and
1                   concentration.  PCB concentration was determined by
                   GC/MS (EPA method 680).  The concentrations of PCDDs and
                   PCDFs in the ash were determined by GC/MS  (EPA Method
•                   613).  In addition, total chloride was determined for
                   the waste feed sample by Ion Chromatography (EPA Method
                   300.0).
1
               B.  Scrubber Effluent

.                   The sample was prepared by solvent extraction and
                   concentration.  PCB concentration was determined by
                   GC/MS (EPA Method 680).

!               C.  Flue Gas Samples

                   1.  Modified Method 5 Train

'                       The various portions of the train were individually
                       prepared and then composited.  The composite was
                       extracted and concentrated.  PCBs were determined by
'                       GC/MS (EPA Method 680) and PCDDs and PCDFs by GC/MS
                       (EPA Method 613).

;                   2.  Method 5 Train

                       The particulates collected were determined
I                       gravimetrically.  The total chlorides were
                       determined by Ion Chromatography  (EPA Method 300.0).

                   3.  Total Chlorinated Organic

                       Two methods were used dependent upon the halogen
                       concentration.  One method involved reduction via
i                       pyrolysis to convert the absorbed organohalides to a
                       titratable species and analysis using  a Dohrmann
                       Microcoulometric - titration system.   Ion
I                       Chromatography was used in the second method.

-------
                                                             21
V.  TEST RESULTS

     The primary objective of this program is to confirm the
     ability of the Shirco Infrared System process to
     decontaminate polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB)  laden soils and
     to incinerate the PCBs with a ORE of 99.9999 percent,  a
     combustion efficiency of 99.9 percent and maximum
     particulate emissions of 0.08 gr/dscf.  A more detailed
     discussion of these results is given in Appendix C, Part 4.

     A.  Solids and Liquid Process Streams

         1.  Waste Feed

             Prior to the demonstration test, samples taken from
             two of the drums of contaminated soils stored at the
             Indiantown Mill were tested for physical
             characteristics.  Results of the tests are given in
             Table V-l.  These data were used to determine
             initial process operating conditions.  Composite
             samples taken during the tests were tested for PCBs.
             Those test results are given in Table V-2.
             Surrogate recoveries and the results of duplicate
             analysis for test 1 demonstrate that the sample
             preparation and analysis procedures were proper.

         2.  Ash

             Table V-3 contains a summary of the analysis of the
             ash samples for hazardous materials.   None of the
             materials were present at the detection limits which
             range from 2.4-3.4 ppb.  Surrogate recoveries and
             the results of triplicate analysis for test 5
             demonstrate that the sample preparation and analysis
             procedures were proper.

         3.  Scrubber Effluent

             The test results and detection limits for the single
             composite sample of scrubber effluent are given in
             Table V-4.  No PCBs were found in the sample.

     B.  Flue Gas

         1.  Particulates and HC1

             The concentrations of particulates in the flue gases
             ranged from 0.015-0.055 gr/dscf when corrected for
             stack oxygen concentration.  The results, given in
             Table V-5 are in compliance with the performance
             standard of 0.08 gr/dscf.

-------
                                                        22
        The concentration of hydrochloric acid (HC1) for
        each of the tests is given in Table V-6.

    2.  Total Organic Halogens (TOX)

        Table V-7 gives the results of the analysis for
        total organic halogens.  These results range from
        351 to 1210 ug/liter.

    3.  Continuous Monitoring

        The concentrations of fixed gases and nitrogen
        oxides in the afterburner discharge steam were
        continuously recorded.  Values taken from those
        charts at five minute increments were averaged.  The
        average values and ranges are given in Table V-B.

        As stated in the Demonstration Test Plan, it was
        expected that oxygen concentration in the exhaust
        gas would be maintained at 3 percent to insure
        adequate waste/air contact in the afterburner.  It
        was also expected the excess oxygen and the planned
        operating temperature would assure that the carbon
        monoxide concentration would be maintained at less
        than 100 ppm.

        These expected concentrations were, in fact,
        maintained.  The oxygen content was maintained at
        greater than 6.5 percent except for two brief
        periods in test 5 when the concentration dropped to
        approximately 3.2 percent.

        The combustion efficiencies for all runs exceeds the
        99.9 percent value as required by 40 CFR Part
        761.70.

    4.  PCBs

        The results of the PCB analysis of the flue gas
        samples are given in Table V-9, No detectable
        amounts of any isomer group were detected except for
        the test 5 samples.  For the test 5 sample the
        concentration of PCBs was 2.4 ug/m .

C.  Performance Results

    Table V-10 gives the destruction and removal
    efficiencies (ORE) for the tests.  The DREs were
    calculated using the analytical detection limits for the
    samples except for the test 5 samples.  The detection
    limits were sufficient to demonstrate DREs in excess of
    99.9999% for tests 2,3,4 and 6.  A review of all the

-------
                                                        23


    data for test 1 indicates the required destruction
    efficiency was achieved; however, that can not be
    demonstrated because of the high detection limit and the
    unexpectedly low concentration of PCBs in the waste feed
    used in that test.  The PCBs in the test 5 samples gave
    a ORE of 99.9999%.  The presence of the PCBs in this
    sample was most likely a result of the two periods of
    low excess oxygen.  These result show that, for this
    unit, minimum permissible oxygen level in the
    afterburner exhaust must be increased from that used for
    this program.

D.  PCDD's and PCDF's

    Composite samples of the ash and scrubber effluent and
    the flue gas sample from test six were analyzed for PCDD
    and PCDF tetra-octa isomers.  The tests results and
    detection limits are given in Table V-ll.  None of those
    materials were present at the detection limits.

-------
                                                                     24
                                    TABLE V-l

                              WASTE CHARACTERIZATION

                         DRUMMED SOILS - INDIANTOWN MILL
Moisture (% wt)                           13.64           13.59
Inerts (% wt)                             84.52           82.77
Organics (% wt)                            1.84            3.64
Heating Value jfBtu/lb)                      220             430
Density (lb/ft3)                             90              90
Form                                       Soil            Soil
Chlorine (% wt)                             Nil             Nil
Sulfur (% wt)                               Nil             Nil
PCB (ppn)                                    150             500

-------
                                                                     25
ISOMER

Cl  (l)-PCB
Cl  (2)-PCB
Cl  (3)-PCB
Cl  (4)-PCB
Cl  (5)-PCB
Cl  (6)-PCB
Cl  (7)-PCS
Cl  (8)-PCB
Cl  (9)-PCB
C1(10)-PCB

SUM PCB
* Duplicate Analysis
ND - Not Detected
                                    TABLE V-2
                              CONCENTRATION OF  PCB'S
                            IN WASTE FEED,  PPM  (mg/kg)
DETECTION
LIMIT
2.5
2.5
2.5
5.0
5.0
5.0
7.5
7.5
7.5
12.5
TEST 1*
MIX 2
ND/ND
7/11
28/35
18/30
0.6/ND
ND/ND
ND/ND
ND/ND
ND/ND
ND/ND
TEST 2
MIX 1
48
740
1060
770
170
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
TEST 3
MIX 1
30
650
1000
710
160
5.4
ND
ND
ND
ND
TEST 4
MIX 1
50
770
1200
790
160
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
TEST 5
MIX 3
3.4
71
200
110
15
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
TES1
MIX
21
74(
110<
81(
161
Nl
Nl
Nl
N:
N
            53.6/76  2790
                  2560
                2970
                 400
         284
ISOMER

Cl (l)-PCB
Cl (2)-PCB
Cl (3)-PCB
Cl (4)-PCB
Cl (5)-PCB
Cl (6)-PCB
Cl (7)-PCB
Cl (8)-PCB
Cl (9)-PCB
C1(10)-PCB

SUM PCB
DETECTION
  LIMIT

   0.2
   0.4
   0.4
   0.8
   0.8
   0.8
   1.2
   1.2
   1.2
   1.8
                                    TABLE V-3
                              CONCENTRATION OF PCB'S
                               IN ASH, PPB  (ug/kg)
TEST 1   TEST 2   TEST 3   TEST 4   TEST 5   TES
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND

  ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND

ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND

ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND/ND/ND
ND/ND/ND
ND/ND/ND
ND/ND/ND
ND/ND/ND
ND/ND/ND
ND/ND/ND
ND/ND/ND
ND/ND/ND
ND/ND/ND
N
N
K
*
*
I
I
I
I
I
                                         ND
ND/ND/ND
^Triplicate Analysis
ND - Not Detected

-------
                                    TABLE V-4
                              CONCENTRATION OF PCB's
                             IN THE SCRUBBER EFFLUENT
                                    PPB (ug/1)
                                                                     26
               ISOMER
Cl
Cl
Cl
Cl
Cl
Cl
Cl
Cl
Cl
(l)-PCB
(2) -PCB
(3) -PCB
(4) -PCB
(5) -PCB
(6) -PCB
(7) -PCB
(8) -PCB
(9) -PCB
10) -PCB
DETECTION
  LIMIT

  0.02
  0.04
  0.04
  0.08
  0.08
  0.08
  0.12
  0.12
  0.12
  0.18
               SUM  PCB
               ND - NOT DETECTED
COMPOSITE
ALL TESTS

   ND
   ND
   ND
   ND
   ND
   ND
   ND
   ND
   ND
   ND

   ND
                                    TABLE V-5
                              PARTICULATE EMISSIONS

                                    TEST 1   TEST 2   TEST 3   TEST 5
                                    TES
Total Particulate (MG)
Sample Volume (DSCF)
Grain Loading (GR/DSCF)
Corrected Loading (GR/DSCF)*
30.200
45.796
0.010
0.015
115.700
48.916
0.036
0.055
44.700
36.116
0.019
0.023
77.500
39.107
0.031
0.037
14
IS
(
(
^Corrected for stack oxygen concentration

-------
                                                                     27
  TABLE V-6
HCL EMISSIONS

  TEST 1   TEST 2   TEST 3   TEST 5
Impinger Chloride Cone,  (mg/1)
Impinger Volume  (ml)
Sample Volume  (DSCF)
Gas Chloride Cone,  (mg/m3)
Stack Vol. Flowrate  (m3/hr)
HCL Emissions  (Ib/hr)
                                                                         TES1
< 3
676
45.796
< 2
92
<0.0004
< 3
571
48.916
< 1
130
•C0.0003
< 3
400
36.116
< 1
69
<0.0001
                                  9   <
                                493     3:
                             39.107   19.'
                                  4   <
                                100      (
                             <0.0009  <0.<
                                    TABLE V-7
                           TOTAL ORGANIC HALOGENS (TOX)
                                    TEST  1   TEST  2
UG/Sample
Sample Volume (Liters)
Concentration (UG/1)
  16500
   26.9
   64.6
890
TEST 3

 8600
 20.8
  414
TEST 5

 7300
 20.8
  351
TES

105
  8
 12

-------
                                                 TABLE V-8
                                   CONTINUOUS  MONITORING EMISSION RESULTS
     COMBUSTION
TEST EFFICIENCY,%
                    AVG
                     PARTS PER MILLION
                    NOy
                    RAPGE
                     AVG
                             CO
RANGE
AVG
                                                         PERCENT
02
RANGE
AVG
                                          C02
.RANGE
 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
99.986
99.969
99.989
99.992
99.997
99.997
92.2   (79.8-95)     12.5
114    (84.9-107)    26.6
79.9   (62.3-73.6)   10.6
80.7   (76.4-96.6)   7.47
81.8   (66.0-93.0)   3.35
64.5   (63.0-66.0)   2.40
(9.2-17.2)    8.96
(24.4-33.5)   12.2
(10.1-12.3)   8.58
(6.76-7.84)   9.63
(2.44-4.88)   6.92
(2.4-2.9)     9.49
       (8.05-11.7)   8.65
       (8.74-11.6)   8.67
       (6.5-13.0)    9.78
       (8.5-10.75)   9.13
       (3.22-12.2)   10.3
       (6.5-11.8)    9.22
                     (6.0-9.10)
                     (8.0-8.96)
                    (7.76-10.9)
                    (8.25-9.90)
                    (8.46-11.7)
                     (8.3-10.8)
                                                                                                   00

-------
                                                                     29
                                    TABLE V-9
                              CONCENTRATION OF PCB's
                          TN FLUE GAS  SAMPLES.  NG/SAMPLE


,)
ISOMER
Cl
Cl
Cl
Cl
Cl
Cl
Cl
Cl
Cl
Cl
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
- PCB
- PCB
- PCB
- PCB
- PCB
- PCB
- PCB
- PCB
- PCB
- PCB
DETECTION
LIMIT
190
290
370
75
75
75
110
110
110
180

TEST 1
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND

TEST 2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND

TEST 3
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND


TEST 5 TEST 6
ND/ND
1800/1900
3200/3300
500/800
ND/ND
ND/ND
ND/ND
ND/ND
ND/ND
ND/ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
SUM PCB
ND
   Not Detected
                           ND
        ND
      ND
  5.5/6
    ND
                                    TABLE V-10
                       DESTRUCTION AND REMOVAL EFFICIENCIES
                     TEST 1   TEST 2
Waste Feed
  PCB Concentrations
   (Ug/g)
  Feed Rate (Ib/hr)
Flue Gas
  PCB Concentration
    (Ug/g)
                     76.0
                    115.4
2790.00
  61.50
                   <314.40  <709.73
Destruction and
  Removal (%)
                                       TEST 3
2560.00
  61.50
           <946.16
             55.93
Flow Rate (nr/nr)    92.75   114.94


                   >99.999  >99.99990  >99.99993
                      TEST 4  TEST 5   TEST 6
2970
61.5
            NA
            NA
                       NA
400.0
106.4
        2416.32
          88.22
2840.
  79.
                                                                        51.
                   99.998   >99.9<

-------
                                    TABLE V-ll
                         PCDD AND PCDF CONGENER ANALYSIS
                                 TEST NUMBER - 6
                                                                     30
DIOXINS:

  Tetra
  Penta
  Hexa
  Hepta
  Octa

FURONS:

  Tetra
  Penta
  Hexa
  Hepta
  Octa
              INCINERATION ASH
                COMPOSITE

           CONCEN-
           TRATION  DETECTION
            fPPb)   LIMITfPPb)
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.10
1.10
0.66
0.99
4.30
0.082
1.200
0.270
0.760
2.200
                           SCRUBBER EFFLUENT
                               COMPOSITE

                           CONCEN-
                           TRATION  DETECTION
                             fPPtl   LIMITfPPtl
% Accuracy:  CL-TCDD
           122
 ND
 ND
 ND
 ND
 ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
                           119
0.46
2.00
1.20
2.20
8.60
0.58
1
1
1
  20
  00
  20
2.80
                                           FLUE GAS
                                      CONCEN-   DETECT]
                                      TRATION     LIM]
                                       fPPbl     fna/i
            ND
            ND
            ND
            ND
            ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
                                      123
           0.3!
           1.8
           2.0
           6.1
          34.0
 1.5
 1.9
 3.6
27.0

-------
                                                             31
VI.  QUALITY ASSURANCE

     The program's QA/QC activities were directed by the QA
     officer, Mr. Mark McCabe, and included the calibration of
     all sampling and analytical apparatus where applicable and
     the use of control samples and replicate analysis where
     feasible.  Details of the QA/QC procedure are given in
     Appendix D, Parts 3.2 and 3.3.4.

     A.  Sampling Apparatus

         The sampling equipment was calibrated according to EPA
         procedures specified in APTD 0576 and 40 CFR 60,
         Appendix A, and manufacturer's specifications.

     B.  Quality Control Samples

         Blanks were collected for all samples in the field.
         Blank, duplicate and spiked samples were prepared and
         processed in accordance with the Permit Application,
         Part 7.4.2.

     C.  Chain of Custody

         Field and laboratory custody procedures as given in the
         Permit Application, Part 7.4.4 were followed.  There
         were no known compromises from this plan.

-------
                                                                       32
          VII  CLOSURE
i
i               Three types of waste were generated during the demonstration
               test:  (1) solid product, i.e. decontaminated soil,  (2)
1               scrubber and decontamination water, and  (3) miscellaneous
               solid materials.

«               The solid product was placed in metal barrels and the
               barrels were sealed, labeled, and placed in a designated
'               storage place.  When test results of these materials are
               obtained, if they can be reclassified as non hazardous, they
               will be abandoned.  All water including that used for
               washing and equipment decontamination was collected and
               stored in tanks as hazardous material.  Miscellaneous solid
               material including protective clothing, paper, plastic and
               containers were placed in metal barrels and the barrels were
               sealed and placed in the impoundment area.
•
               At the end of the last day of material processing, the test
               unit was baked out to decontaminate internally.  After the
               unit was cooled, the feed conveyor was disassembled as
               needed to permit thorough washing with soap and water.  The
               internal and external surfaces of the trailer, the external
               surfaces of equipment in the trailer, and miscellaneous
               items such as tools and stairs were washed with soap and
               water.

-------
                                            33
 APPENDIX  A




OPERATING LOG

-------

-------


-------
                       I	_- NMU- .. 3T
                        OrOATlMC tOC
CUSTOMER:   	
      tea ram_
              MRS •
                                                      DATE:
                                                      OrUATORt
                                                                                                                                     ':•>
                                                                                                                                     |'
                                                                                                                                     jv;
.  TDtt
i  or
<  MT
I  in)
      •ELI ma
      tcrrac
     BELT SrEO
     (U/WK) .
               1- Zone Al
        3- Zoo* At
                       nmMmes Cr)
                4-Hid- ZOM
                \- ton* §1
*-*."»
«-scc
                                    fSii.
                                  10- SCC E»h
                                         Il-Serub. E^
ITT
                                    3^
                                    ZcfkM I
                        nlm Voltm
                                               • SSi
                                                                 Toura
                                                    ZOIM A KETC
                                                            1
                                                                OTIpt
                                                             ton* • VtK
                                                                              fRESSURE (IH.WC)
                                     FUHM. PRATT
                                     FURM. EMI.
                                     AFTERSURMET
                                                                       ATTSf-M. EXH
                                                        SCRUBBED A f
                                                        COMB. BLR OUT
                                               runs. COMB AIR
                                                                                AFTBRN. COMB. AIR
                                                                                              JET ST
Zonal
                                                                                                   TIC
                                                                                                         SC BURNCR
           HAT. CAS
            UBffU-
                                                                                                                SCRUBin
VEHTURI
H20 (HI)
                                                                                                          TWER
                                                                                                         H20 (VSI)
                                                                                                                                     r
s?
ftL
                                   /W)
                                                                        T?*' *.
                                                                                05
                                                                                                       5
                                         ML
                                          m
                                                                                   Ob
       fit
                                                                                           L/.O
•/3S7
                                                               f
     «/.*-•• //
                 Ml
              
                                                                                                                  JQ_
                                                                                                          7
                                                                                                                       /A-5"
                                                                                                                        47
                                                                                                                                              u,

                                                                                                                                             L
                                                                                                                                             I-
                                                                                                                                             *^l"
                                                                                                                                             f...
                                                                                                                                            ^

                                                                                                                                             r-;
                                                                                                                                            t
                                                                                                                                            f-
                                                                                                                                            t

-------
I   .  f

-------
       V
S v  I
'1.
    8
         s
          31
          =fl

          «SI
         I?
          i
          ^
          liJ.
i!
         si

            1
           XA
            1
   l
                M
                   (S
                   Wl
                     '•0
                       00

                             oo
                             ro
                             -3
                               N

                                       fc
                                          ^
                                            b-1

                                             t1
                                •OD
                                               <£•&=,

                                    ,£
                                                    V,
                                                  v.
^  n^
                                                        i
                                                   v-0
                                                                  
                                                               '


                                                                           fcko--
                                                                     N
                                                                             N
                                                                      tn

-------
, li
 i

'  F
 1.
 L
           2fi~
           ass
          lul

              e*
              8 **
             •

             u *•*

          H-E
                                 AkJ
                                   i
f*
VI

-------

-------
   TIME
    OF
    DAT
   (IMS)
      SCIUBBCft
      vtimmi
      mo (cm)
       I OWE
      R20 (Cm)
MAT.
CAS
SCBUB EX
 (tmc)
                             UlUt. EXH.
 /» OJI.
  INWC)
FURNACE
COMB. AIR
 (1HUC.)
                                       COMB A«
                                        (IMC)
TOO
 or
DAT
(BUS)
MATERIAL
  FEED
 (US)
TIME
 or
DAT
(ItU)
MATERIAL
  FEED
 (LBS)
                                                                                    COMKENTS
[SOI
                                                                                                T

                                                                                                    3X7^- H, 25
lici
D
n

-------

      ^
      -^o
      ,Vn
«£
     Ci

     ^A;
W
          I5SI
          ir
            aS

            g!
           ?s1
            S


            i
            a
            f

            I'
           *
           S
            i
           kg
           §1    •  I
           *i


           r  r   f
           i   (

               1°'

               §.
                §
                 .1

-------
M.
          fll
          V

                                                     43
                              «•*,

-------
^
-------


           •«-:•..
           ,•>
                       '\
                                          .••' 1-. '•.
                                           f'V i.^;

                                                                I.
TI«
 or
 DAT
(«$)'
       •noT
 SCRUlftU
..VUTUII
 »?o (cm)
       Jno
   (cm)'
X IUUIU

 MAT.
 CAS
       IkL
             FURK. EXM.
                    A/B EMI.
          B EXH.
        (nwc)
FURNACE
OMB. Alt
                         »-JI
               AF
               COHI AIR
               -i»JHH_
11MB
 or
DAT
(IBS)
                                         MATERIAL
                                          FEED
TIME
 or
DAT
.(OS)
                                          MATERIAL
                                           FEED
                                           (LBS)
                                                               comam
                                                             7T "* f
                                                       Jl.^  $•*( gA.
I\a6'
MS
                            ^f7e>SjS
                                  >9*s Wl. /3te
                                                      >1J<1lf ^?
                                                      o.
                                                      ;r*3
                             2&i
                                                              <:?./JL?Tittt»A*/ $.io4Ae< k*l-/'*l>iMi*(\ 5,
                                                               /j>i/^ A»M>e. i/UA^-^/^ /^rU ^t$
                                                              •    »  ^   
-------
                                                                                                                                                      —J   '---J
                          MII.CO «-.«. ?nm
                           OrCRATUK UK
evsrmcBi    	
IUVMSC tD« METt»

-------
\ »•
                             -   a
                               5*1
                               5J5
                               e|,


                               !1!
-••'


-------
                                               48
    APPENDIX  B




MATERIAL FEED LOG

-------
 WASTE FEED
                                          49
May 13, 1986
f Time
1400
1405
1422
1440
1458
1518
1535
1555
1614
1627
1656

1010
1100
1152
1236
1315
1345
1420
1440
1530
1600
1635
Mix
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Weights
(Pounds,)
16.5
27.8
37.8
33.3
32.2
39.0
34.4
34.4
36.8
38.7
24.7
May 14, 1986
38.6
45.3
35.3
35.3
35.0
39.7
34.4
43.6
44.8
35.1
52.9
Cumulative
Weight (Pounds)
16.5
44.3
82.0
115.3
147.5
186.5
220.9
255.3
292.1
330.8
355.5

38.6
83.9
119.2
154.5
189.5
229.2
263.6
307.2
352.0
387.1
440.0

-------
                                  May 15, 1986                               50
0920
0955
1023
1045
1100
1120
1131
1155
1220
1245
1305
1318
1348
1422
1522
1532
1553
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
33.5
46.7
25.6
37.8
26.0
37.7
40.8
43.5
47.6
41.6
0.3
38.6
40.4
43.1
40.5
42.0
36.2
33.5
80.2
105.8
143.6
169.6
207.3
248.1
291.6
339.2
380.8
381.1
38.6
79.0
122.1
162.6
204.6
240.8
*  Times that the buckets of feed were started

-------
                                                    51
         APPENDIX  C




TESTING AND ANALYSIS REPORT

-------
                                                    52
                FINAL REPORT
       SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PROGRAM
        SHIRCO PORTABLE PILOT UNIT

         FLORIDA STEEL CORPORATION
           INDIANTOWN MILL SITE
               Prepared for:
       Shirco Infrared Systems, Inc.
               Dallas, Texas
REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGIES INC., CONCORD, MA

-------
                                                               53


                        Table Of Contents

1. Introduction	    3

2. Summary of Results  	 .....    4

3. Sampling and Analytical Protocols .  	    9
     3.1 Process Streams	    9
          3.1.1 Solid and Liquid Streams 	    9
          3.1.2 Flue Gas	   10
     3.2 Quality Assurance/Quality Control Procedures  ...   19
          3.2.1 Sampling Apparatus 	   19
          3.2.2 Quality Control Samples  	   20
          3.2.4 Sorbent Media Quality  	   20
          3.2.4 Chain of Custody	   21
     3.3 Analytical Procedures 	   22
          3.3.1 Presampling Activities  	   22
          3.3.2 Sample Preparation 	   23
          3.3.3  Analytical Procedures  	   29
          3.3.4 Quality Assurance/Quality Control  	   34

4. Presentation and Discussion of Results  	   36

-------
                                                               54




 1.  Introduction



     Remediation  Technologies,  Inc.,   (ReTeC) was contracted by



 Shirco  Infrared Systems of  Dallas, Texas  to conduct  a sampling



 and  analysis  program  to  evaluate the thermal treatment of PCB



 contaminated soils  using  their  portable  pilot  unit.  A field



 sampling program  was conducted  during  the  period of May 13-May



 15,  1986 at the Florida Steel  Indiantown Mill  Site, Indiantown,



 Florida.



     A  total  of six (6) sampling runs were conducted in order to



 evaluate  the  effectiveness  of  the  infrared  technology under



 varying process conditions including: solid phase residence time,



 waste feed rate and  process temperatures.  During the  course of



 each of  these test  runs, representative  samples were collected




 from each of the  four process  streams: waste  feed; incinerator



 ash; scrubber effluent and flue gas.




     This report  documents the  results of the field program and



 presents the calculated efficiency of the pilot unit  in treating



PCB  contaminated  soils  at  the site. The following sections of



 this document present a  summary of  results, description  of the



sampling  and   analytical  protocols   and  a  presentation  and



discussion of results.

-------
                                                               55





2. Summary of Results



     The  field sampling program  was designed  to demonstrate the



technology's compliance  with the  standards for PCB incinerators



as set forth in 40 CFR 761.70 and the conditions for the research



and  development   permit  issued  by  the  U.S.  EPA  Office  of



Pesticides and Toxic Substances on May 13, 1986. As a result, all



process   streams,  influent  and  effluent, were analyzed for PCB



content,  and each of the three effluent streams  was analyzed for



polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins  and furans  (PCDDs and PCDFs).



In addition, the flue gas stream was monitored  for the following



compounds:  fixed   gases  (oxygen,  carbon  dioxide  and  carbon



monoxide);  total  particulates;  hydrochloric  acid;  oxides  of




nitrogen  and total chlorinated organics.



     Results  from  the  PCB  analyses of the process streams are



summarized in Table 2-1.  The PCB  concentrations in  the treated



soil samples  from each run were not detected above an analytical



detection limit of 3.4 parts per  billion (ppb).  As indicated in



the Table, the contaminated material originally contained from 76



to 2,970  parts per million of  total PCB.  These results indicate



that the  pilot unit  operated within the permit requirements for



the disposal of the  soil  at  the  site  and  that  the infrared



technology  is  appropriate  for the decontamination of similarly




contaminated materials.



The results  of analysis  of a  composite sample  of the scrubber



effluent,  or  blowdown,  indicated  that no detectable levels of




PCBs were concentrated  in  this  process  stream  throughout the

-------
                                                               56





 sampling   program.   The  analytical  detection  limit  for  this



 analysis was 0.34 ppb  and indicated  that the  product from this



 stream could  safely be  disposed of within the conditions of the




 permit.



     No PCBs were detected in the flue gas samples of four of the



 five runs  sampled. Due to time constraints, flue gas measurements



 were not conducted during  test  run  4.  The  process conditions



 associated with  this  run  are  not "worst case" and should not



 result in  air emissions in excess  of the  other monitored tests.



 Analytical detection limits of 0.3-1.7 ug/ m3 were appropriate to



 demonstrate destruction and removal efficiencies (DRE) of greater



 than 99.9999  X in  three of these instances. In the case of test



 run 1, however, a DRE of only > 99.999 could be validated  due to



 the  lack  of  analytical  sensitivity  and  the unexpectedly low




 concentrations of PCBs in the waste.



     PCBs  were detected in the flue gas sample from test run 5 at




 a concentration  of 2.4  ug/m3. The  presence of these species in



 the flue gas stream is thought to be the result  of a  low oxygen



 condition  which  is  discussed  in  detail  in Section 4 of this



 report.



     Additional   analyses,   including:   fixed   gases;   total



 particulate;  hydrochloric  acid;  oxides  of  nitrogen and total




chlorinated organics, were also conducted on the flue gas stream.



The averaged  results of these analyses are presented in Table 2-



 2.



     The calculated combustion efficiencies for all  for the test

-------
                                                               57





 runs were  determined to  be greater  than 99.9 %. The associated



 concentrations of carbon monoxide in the  flue gas  stream ranged



 from 1.6 ppm to a high of 29.1 ppm.



     The particulate  concentration values  reported in the Table



 have been corrected to  7% Oj  in order  to facilitate comparison



 with regulations  for hazardous  waste incinerators (40 CFR 264).



 The flue gas  concentration  of  particulate  matter  ranged from



 0.015  to   0.055  and  is  in  compliance  with  the  referenced



 performance standard of 0.08 gr/dscf.



     Hydrochloric  acid  (HCL)  emissions  from  the  system were



 determined to  be less  than 4  Ib/hr, and in compliance with the




 referenced   performance    standards    for    hazardous   waste



 incinerators.



     The average flue gas concentrations of nitrogen oxides (N'Ox )



 and total chlorinated organic  (RCL) were  determined to  be 85.5



 ppm and 209 mg/M3 respectively.



     Dioxin and  dibenzofuran analyses  were conducted on samples



 from the incinerator ash and  flue  gas  streams.  So chlorinated



dioxin or  furan species  were found in these samples. Analvtical



detection limits for TCDD in these samples were 0.10 ppb and 0.38



ng/n»3 respectively.

-------
                                                       Tibie 1-1
                                                   Sniarj of leiilti
                                                       PCI
TNT IUI

MSTI rni
     PCI coiceitratioi|i|/|)
            Petd ratt(li/hr|

IHClNltATOI ISI
     PCI coiceitratioidf/il

SCIUIIII IFfUIMT COHPOSITI
     PCI coiceitritloi(i|/|)
run Gil
    PCI coiceitritioi(u/iJ|
           No* nte(iJ/ir|
  Ititnctioi aid leiofild!
TI.O
US. 4
( 2.4
114.14 (
H.T5
li.lli t ) j
2710
ll.S
< 2.f
fOl.Tl
114.14
ii.iim
2SCI
it.i
( 1.4
< S4C.IC
S5.ll
) si. mil
2S70
il.S
< 2.f
KC
1C
NC
400
IOf.4
< 2.1
24IC.12
11.22
If.Illi tt
2140.1
Tf.l
( 1TD.4T
SI. 1C
ff.fSffl
          III iot let die to
     uilftical detectioi liiit
tt Lou Oil if die to periodi of  oper-
     itioi Nitk lecoidarf ciuber oiriei
     levelf approackiaf tke perlit coiditioa
     of 31 eiceii
HC  Flue  (as teitf not conducted
Ln
CO

-------
                                                                                                                                                     59
;  i
'
                                                                                                             O.  —  w
                                                                                                            -
i1
r— «^i        *^

. «* •_     **-'-.•
UiJ t      tCj C—
    «.'  '.   O  =*
    tii  ..O .O ,O
    fc* k.  »-  K;
'j*xrli*±

-------
                                                               60




 3.  Sampling  and Analytical Protocols



      This  section   documents   the  sampling,  analytical,  data



 reduction  and  quality  assurance  procedures  used  during  the



 demonstration test  of  the pilot  incinerator.




      As previously   indicated, six  (6) test runs were conducted,



 under varied process conditions,  to determine  the effectiveness



 of  the  Shirco technology  in processing  soils contaminated with



 PCBs.  During the   course  of  the  field  program,  samples were



 collected from four process streams: waste feed; incinerator ash;



 scrubber effluent and  flue gas.  The  specific sampling approaches



 and associated  analytical procedures  for each  of these streams



 are presented below.








 3.1 Process  Streams



 3.1.1 Solid  and Liquid Streams




 Waste Feed




      Samples of  "as fired"  waste feed  (contaminated soil) were



collected from the  incinerator feed hopper at 15 minute intervals



 throughout each test run.  These samples  were composited  into a



precleaned amber  glass bottle to form a single, one liter sample



 for organic  and chloride analyses.








Incinerator Ash




     Samples of the treated  soil  were  collected  from  the ash



hopper at  fifteen minute  intervals throughout  the test run and




extending to one additional interval equal to the primary chamber

-------
                                                                        61




         residence time  past the completion of the run. As in the case of



         the waste feed, these samples were  composited into  a single one



         liter sample for organic and EP toxicity analyses.
         Scrubber Effluent



              Samples  of  the  scrubber  effluent  were  collected at the



 I        conclusion of each day of sampling subsequent to  the termination



         of waste  feed and  cool down  of the unit. A one liter sample of



 j        the daily scrubber blowdown was collected  in a  precleaned amber



 j        glass container for organic analysis.







 |         3.1.2 Flue Gas



              The  characterization  of  the  flue gas stream required the
 r


 ,        most comprehensive .sampling program entailing organic sampling as



 i        well as specific sampling procedures for particulate matter,  HCL,



         RCL and  continuous  measurements  for  fixed  gases  and  KOx.  A



 I        discussion  of  the  specific procedures and instrumentation  used



         for the accurate  characterization  of  this  stream  is provided



 {        below.







         Particulate Matter and HCL



i             Particulate and  inorganic acid  species were simultaneously



         sampled using a Method 5 sampling  train. The  impinger solutions



I        of  the   standard reference method system were modified to include



*        IN NaOH (second impinger) to ensure the  efficient collection of



         HCL.
                                        10

-------
                                                                        62
              Samples  were  collected from  a  single  traverse  point  in  the  3



]        in.  diameter  stack.   Nominal  sampling   times   were  one   hour in



         duration providing  for  a  collected sample volume of  greater than



'        30 dry standard cubic  feet (dscf).   All sampling   and  leak  check



|        procedures  were conducted in  accordance with  the requirements of



         the  Reference Method.



I             Particulate matter  was recovered from the  front  half  of the




         sampling train   (nozzle,   probe   and  filter housing),   using



I         distilled  in  glass   (DIG)    acetone,   into    precleaned  linear



f         polyethylene  (LPE) sampling container. The associated particulate



         filter (Reeve Angel  934  AH)  was recovered  into  its  original  petri



I         dish  for transport and subsequent analysis.



              The impinger   solutions,  Dl   water  and  NaOH , were measured




         volumetrically and recovered into  precleaned  LPE   containers for



',         transport to  the laboratory.



              Calibration  and  field  data   sheets for the  particulate



'         sampling train are included in Appendix  A.
        Organic Sampling - PCBs. PCDDs and PCDFs



             The concentration and mass flow rate of the  organic species



        of interest  for the  program were  quantified using  the Modified



        Method 5 train illustrated in Figure 3-1.



             The sampling train consisted  of a  glass-lined  ,heat  traced




        probe  with  a  stainless  steel  buttonhook  nozzle  and attached



        thermocouple and pitot tube assembly.  A  heated  (248   »/-  25°F)




        glass fiber filter (Reeve Angel 934 AH), water cooled condenser






                                       11

-------
                                                                         63
Tf MM * A Tun I
                                                                    VACUUM
  * First impinger which serves as condesate trap has a very short
    stem that does not extend into the condesate.
    Modified Method 5 SanplinR Train
FIGURE
 3-1

-------
                                                                        64



          and  sorbent  module,  containing  precleaned  XAD-2  resin  and

 i

         maintained  at  <68°F,  are  located  downstream   of  the  probe
 i

         assembly.  The  sorbent  module  is  followed by a series of four


 i        impingers for the collection of organic condensate and removal of


 (        entrained moisture  from the  gas stream.  The first impinger acts
 *
 *
         as a condensate reservoir  and  is  modified  to  prevent organic


 ;        material from being purged from the collected liquid. The second,


         third  and  fourth  impingers  contain .water  and  desiccant for
 t

 1        determination  of  the  moisture  content   of  the  flue gas. The


 I        impinger  system  is  followed  by  a  pump,   dry  gas  meter and


         calibrated orifice.


 j             All components  of the sampling train that had the potential
 i

         to  come  in  contact  with  samples  for   organic  analysis were
 i

 i        subjected to  a rigorous cleaning procedure prior to their use in


 j        the field.  The pre-sampling activities included:  a soap and water


         wash;  15% nitric acid rinse; DDI water rinse and an organic rinse

 »
 f        with acetone and methylene  chloride.   All  glassware  was capped
 i

         with solvent rinsed aluminum foil for transport.


              The  organic  sorbent  and  field solvents were subjected to


 t        QA/QC  evaluations in accordance with EPA Level I  procedures prior


         to their use in the field.


 i             A field  biased blank  train was  assembled and recovered in


         the field in conjunction with each  day of  sampling in  order to


I        quantify any biases introduced through the handling and transport


         of the samples.


              Samples of flue gas  were collected  from a  single traverse




'                                       13

-------
                                                                65




 point  in   the  exhaust   stack.   All   sampling   and   leak  check



 procedures  were conducted in  accordance with   the requirements  of



 Reference Method  5.  Sampling  times ranged from  one  to  two hours



 in duration depending upon the  concentration  of PCBs   in the feed



 material  and incinerator  operating conditions.



      Upon completion  of the sampling run the  train was sealed and



 removed to  a designated,  clean  area for recovery.  The front half



 of the   train was   brushed and  rinsed with 1:1 methylene chloride



 and acetone (V:V).  The front  half  rinse was recovered into a pre-



 cleaned amber  glass  bottle  with  Teflon cap  liner. The  container



 was then  sealed with  Teflon tape.




      The  particulate  filter was recovered into its original glass



 petri dish  which was  then sealed with Teflon  tape for transport.



      The  sorbent module was sealed with its original  ground glass



 joints.




      The  volume  of  the condensate was   measured  in   a precleaned



 graduated cylinder  and transferred to an amber  glass container.



 The back  half  of the  train  (back   half  of   the   filter housing,



 Teflon  connector,   condenser  and first  impinger)  were rinsed with



 DIG methylene  chloride into the recovered condensate sample. The



 container was  then  vented and sealed.




     The net water  gain of  the remaining  impingers was determined



and recorded for calculation of moisture  content.








Continuous Monitoring  - Oa. COat CO  and  NQx



     Monitoring  for fixed gases (O»,  COa  and  CO)   and  NOx was






                               14

-------
                                                               66




 conducted  on   a continuous  basis  throughout  each of the six  (6)



 test   runs performed  during   the  field  program.  Samples were



 extracted  from an existing, threaded  fitting located between  the



 exit  of  the afterburner and entrance to the venturi scrubber.  The



 sample was delivered to  the monitors  by a sampling system that



 included:  a   stainless  steel  probe  equipped  with calibration



 fitting; a conditioning system  consisting of a in-line filter  and



 moisture condenser: and, leak free sampling pump.




      Calibrations of  the  monitors  were  conducted  on  a daily



 basis, prior   to the  start of  and at  the completion of sampling,



 using certified  Protocol I  gases obtained  from Scott Specialty



 Gases.  Three  point  calibration  curves were developed for each



 monitor using  a gas dilution system. The accuracy of the dilution



 system and  gas concentrations  were verified  in the field using




 the results  of  replicate  Orsat  analyses.  In  all  cases,  the




 results    of   these   analyses,   as  presented  in  Appendix  B



demonstrated acceptable agreement with the predicted results.



     The specifications for each of the gas analyzers is provided



in Table  3-1. Data  from the monitors was collected at 10 minute



 intervals and continuously recorded using strip  chart recorders.



The  strip  chart  data  was  then  reduced  to provide 30 minute



averages for each test run.
                               15

-------
                                                                                 67
                           TABLE 3-1

                  SPECIFICATIONS OF CONTINUOUS MONITORING
                           EQUIPMENT
PARAMETER

NOi               Thenoelectric  IDA                  0-10,000 ppi
                  Cheiiluiinescence
CARBON DIOXIDE    IR Industries  Model  720             0-20 X
                  (NDIR)

CARBON MONOXIDE   Bendix  Model 8501-5  CA              0-50     ppi
                  (HDIB)                              0-250
                                                     0-500
                                                     0-1000

OXYGEN            DelU F Analyzer                    0-5   X
                  Coloriietrie                        0-10
                                                     0-25

-------
                                                               63
Total Organic Chloride








     A modified version of EPA Method 450.1 was used to determine



the total organic halide (TOX) emissions.



     Flue gas samples were drawn from the exhaust stack through a



series of two sorbent  tubes each  containing 40  mg of activated



carbon.    The  constant  flow air sampling pumps were calibrated



against a 500 ml  bubble tube  flow meter.   Initial calibrations



were performed prior to the start of each sampling run.




     At the  end of each sample run, the pump was recalibrated to



assure there has been  no deviation  from the  pre-set flow rate.



     Upon completion  of each  run, the sorbent tubes were capped



and labeled for transport to the laboratory.








     A complete list of samples collected from each  sampling run



is presented in Table 3-2.
                               17

-------
                                  TABLE  3-2



          FIELD  SAMPLING —  NUMBER AND TYPE  OF  SAMPLES  PER  TEST  RUN



   Sample              Sample                Number      Container



 Description            Code     Analysis    Collected      Type     Comments
 Modified Method  5
Particulate filter
Front half
Condensate
XAD-2 resin and
-MM5/PF
-MM5/FH
-MM5/CD
-MM5/XR
organic
organic
organic
organic
1
1
1
1
 rinse



 Impinger catch      -MM5/IMP



 Method 5



 Particulate filter  -M5/PF



 Front half          -M5/FH



 RCL



 Charcoal tubes      -RCL-A.B



 Stolid/Liquid Samples
  HC1








gravimetric



gravimetric








   TOX
a — extract with methylene chloride



b -- store at 4° C
1



1
Waste feed
Incinerator ash
Scrubber effluent
-WF
-IA
-SE
organic
organic
organic
1
1
1
Glass petri    b



500 ml amber   b



500 ml amber  a,b



Glass trap     b








500 ml LPE     b








Petri



500 ml LPE








glass tube     b








1,000 ml amber



1,000 ml amber



1,000 ml amber
                                    18

-------
                                                                        70
 ,   3.2 Quality Assurance/Quality Control Procedures




         The quality  assurance program entails the calibration of all samplin

    and analytical apparatus where  applicable and  the use  of control sample
 i

    and replicate  analyses where  feasible.  Copies of field calibration sheet


    are provided in Appendix A.




    3.2.1 Sampling Apparatus



 •

         The sampling equipment will be calibrated according to  EFA procudurt


    specified  in  APTD  0576  and  40  CFR  60,   Appendix  A and manufacturei


    specifications.




 '        Dry Gas Meter and Orifice Meter
 1



         The dry gas meters for all sampling  trains  were calibrated  against


    standard  wet  test  which  has  been calibrated against a spirometer.   T


    meters  are adjusted so that the measured  gas  volumes were  within 1 perce


|   of  proof;  i.e.,  Y factors are between 0.99 and 1.01.




         Thermocouples




         The type  K thermocouples in the meter control box, heated sample be



                                        19

-------
                                                                        71





     impinger umbilical connector, and attached  to  the  probe  were calibrate



     against ASTM  mercury-in-glass thermometers at two points.  The first poin



     is in an ice bath and the second at the boiling point of water.



 •        Pitot Tube






 i

         The  "S"  type  Pitot   tubes   were   designed   to   meet  geometri



     configurations as  defined in  EPA Method  2.  Additionally, the pitot tut
 4


     coefficients were verified in a wind tunnel.








     3.2.2 Quality Control Samples








         Blank Samples
 i







 »        Blanks were collected for all  samples  in  the  field,  i.e., solvei



    rinses,  sorbent  traps, and a glass fiber filter.  Each blank was subjectc


 \

    to the exact same treatment and analysis as the corresponding sample.





 i


         Field-Biased Blanks








         Field-biased blanks, blank samples which have ben exposed to field a



    sampling conditions  to assess  possible contamination from the field, we



    collected daily for each of the sampling methods.

 i






 i   3.2.4 Sorbent Media Quality








         The XAD-2  sorbents used in the flue gas sample collection  system we






1                                       20

-------
                                                                    72




 subjected  to   rigorous pretreatment   in the laboratory prior  to release foi



 field sampling purposes.  The recommended  pretreatment procedures includec



 sequential extraction  with a  series of organic solvents so  native organi<



 contamination  will be reduced  to acceptable  levels.   The requisite resii



 pretreatment   procedures  and  guidelines  for evaluating resin'qualitv ar



 contained  in  EPA  IERL-RTP  Procedures  Manual:	Level  I Environmenta



 Assessment (second Edition)  EPA-600/7-78-201.








 3.2.4 Chain of Custody








     All samples  were placed  in a  central repository as soon as possibl



 after recovery.  The sample repository  was the  charge of  a single perso




 throughout the sampling trip.








     Samples were  transferred to  the analytical  laboratory by the perse



 responsible for sample security.  Upon receipt at the laboratory, they wer




 lugged into  the laboratory logbook, given an identification  number and pt



 in to the custody of a single person responsible for  their analysis.   A]



 samples were  inspected for  damage and leakage from liquid sample bottles



Laboratory receipt forms for the collected samples are provided in Append:



B.
                                    21

-------
                                                               73





3.3 Analytical Procedures








3.3.1 Presampling Activities








     The first phase of the program was initiated in April,  1986,



and involved ERCO providing cleaned XAD-2 sorbents and glass wool



to prepare  the sampling  traps.   High purity reagents were also



provided for use as sampling train rinses and impinger solutions.



Procedures used  to obtain  and/or prepare these materials are as



follows:








     o    Organ-Free Water -- Three  gal of high-purity



          water were  prepared by distilling Cambridge,



          Massachusetts  tap  water  and   passing  the




          distillate  through   an  activated  charcoal



          column.








     o    Acetone  --  "Resi-analyzed"-grade acetone was



          obtained from  J.  T.  Baker Chemicals and used



          without  further purification.








     o    Methylene  Chloride  -- "Resi-analyzed"-grade



          methylene  chloride  was  obtained from J. T.



          Baker Chemicals  and  used  without  further



          purification.
                               22

-------
                                                               74





      o     XaOH  —   IN  NaOH was prepared by dissolving



           40  g  of  the  NaOH into   1 liter  of distilled



           deionized water.








      o     Glass  Wool  --  Glass   wool  was  cleaned by



           heating  it in a furnace  overnight at 400 ° C.








      o     XAD-2 —  Precleaned XAD-2  was obtained from



           Supelco    (Supelpak-2,     EPA    Level    1



           Contamination-free).  It was further purified



           by  soxhlet  extraction in methylene chloride.



           At  the end of 16hr of extraction, the solvent



           was discarded and fresh  aliquots of methylene




           chloride  extract   exhibited  no  extraneous



           peaks in  the gas  chromatography screen, the



           XAD-2  was  then  air-dried  and  immediately



           packed into precleaned sampling traps.








      3.3.2 Sample Preparation








     On May   30, 1986,  ERCO received the waste feed materials and



their  combustion  products  for  characterization.    While  the




analyses for  TOX,  particulate matter, total chloride, and PCB in




incinerator ash and waste  feed materials  were initiated  on the



samples  submitted,  the  flue  gas and scrubber effluent samples



required special handling prior to the final analysis.






                               23

-------
                                                              75
     Sample preparation procedures and  the methods   used for  the



resulting analyses are as follow:








     o    Waste Feed  Samples  --   A 10-g aliquot  of  the



          waste feed  sample was   taken for extraction.



          It   was   spiked   with   terphenyl-dM   and



          extracted for 16 hr   in   a  soxhlet  extractor



          using  a  hexane/acetone  (1:1  v/v)  solvent



          system.   The resulting extract was dried over




          anhydrous sodium  sulfate and reduced to 5 ml



          using a Kuderna-Danish evaporator.



          PCB  analysis,   as  positional   isomer,   was



          performed  according to  EPA Method 680.   In



          this  case,   a  1  ml aliquot  of the  sample



          extract was fortified with internal  standards




          containing     chrysene-d!2    before    GC/MS




          analysis.    The waste-feed  samples  were also



          analyzed for total  chloride  content  by  ion



          chromatography.








          Incinerator Ash








    o     PCB Analysis:    A 100-g aliquot   of  each  ash



          sample  was   spiked  with  the  same  surrogate




          used  for the waste  feed samples.  The  sample





                               24

-------
                                                     76




was  extracted  for  16   hr  with  methylene



chloride.    The  resulting extract was dried



over    anhydrous    sodium    sulfate    and



concentrated  to  approximately  2  ml  using



Kuderna  Danish   evaporators  to  facilitate



lower  sample  detection  limits, the extract



was further reduced to  0.3 ml  by purging it



under a  fine stream  of purified nitrogen at



room temperature.    Internal  standards were



then added prior to GC/MS analysis.








PCDD/PCDF Analysis:   Incinerator ash from the six



runs (IA-1 through 6) was composited  and aliquots




were taken  for PCDD/PCDF  analyses.  The relative



amount of ash being composited is as follows:




     Run 1A                   24% (by weight)



     Run 2A                   13% (by weight)



     Run 3A                   13% (by weight)



     Run 4A                   13% (by weight)



     Run 5A                   22% (by  weight)



     Run 6A                   16% (by weight)



The samples were  prepared  according  to EPA



Contract Laboratory Program (CLP) Procedures.



This  involved  overnight  soxhlet extraction



and  column  chromatographic  clean up of the




resulting extract.






                     25

-------
                                                     77
Scrubber Effluent








Scrubber Effluent Samples --  A 333-ral  aliquot of




each of SE-2, SE-4, and SE-6 was composited into a




1-liter  sample.    It   was   then   spiked  with




terphenyl-di4   and   extracted   with   methylene




chloride in  a  separator  funnel.    The resulting




extract  was  dried  over anhydrous sodium sulfate




and  concentrated  to  about  2  ml  using Kuderna




Danish evaporators.  To facilitate lower detection




limits, the  extract was further reduced  to 0.3 ml




by  purging  it  under  a  fine stream of purified




nitrogen at  room temperature.   Internal standards




were then added prior to GC/MS analyses.








Flue Gas Samples








Flue Gas  Samples --  The flue  gas sampling train




contained  various  components  that   had  to  be




individually  prepared  and  composited  into  one




integrated sample.   The  components  included the




XAD-2 sorbent  trap (XR-  ), probe rinses (FH-  ),




condensate water (CD-   ), and  particulate filter






                     26

-------
                                                          73




     trap  (PF-    ).   The sample preparation procedures



     are delineated in Figure  3-2, with  the following



     exceptions: FBB-2  (ERCO ID  32490) and the Method



     Blank  (ERCO ID 32492).  In FBB-2, organ-free water



     was used as a substitute for the condensate water.



     In the Method Blank, organic-free water  was again



     used as a substitute for the condensate water.  In




     addition, Blank XAD-2 was  used as  a sorbent trap



     and no particulate filter was used.








o    Impinger  Solution  -- The impinger solutions



     were  analyzed  for  total  chloride  by  ion



     chromatography (EPA Method 300.0).








o    Probe  Rinses  --  The particle concentration




     (total suspended  solid) of  the probe rinses



     was determined  according to Federal Register



     40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 5.








o    Charcoal Tubes  —  The  charcoal  tubes were



     analyzed for total organic halogen.
                          27

-------
                                                                              79
Condensate
 (CD-   )
Extracted
3 x 60ml
  with
nethylene
chloride
Probe rinse
 (FH-   )
Particulate
  filter
 (PF-   )
                                            Weighed
   XAD-2
Sorbent trap
  (XR-    )
                                             Addition of
                                              surrogate
                                                       Soxhlet
                                                   16-hr extraction
                                                in methylene  chloride
                        Extracts combined and  dried
                       over anhydrous  sodium sulfate
                          Concentrated to about 2 ml
                       using Kuderna Danish evaporators
                    Further concentrated to about 0.3 ml
                  by purging under a fine stream of nitrogen
                            Add internal standards
                                    GO/MS
       Sample Preparation Procedures
                                                        FIGURE
                                                        3-2

-------
                                                               so
 3.3.3  Analytical Procedures








     PCB by GC/MS (Method 680)








     Method 680 was used for the GC/MS characterization of PCB in



 the waste feed material, incinerator ash,  scrubber effluent, and



 flue  gas   samples.     The  method  was  slightly  modified  by



 substituting terphenyl-di4 instead  of   l3C\j-4,4'-DDT  and  »3Cs-



 gamma-BHC, as  the surrogate  standard.  PCBs were identified and



 measured as isomer groups  (i.e., by  level of  chlorination).   A



 concentration  was  measured  for  each  PCB isomer group and the



 total PCB concentration in  each sample  extract was  obtained by




 summing isomer-group concentrations.








     Before sample  analyses, the response factors of PCB at each



 level  of  chlorination  were   determined   from   a  five-point



calibration.   Since it  was not feasible to calibrate all of the



 209 possible PCB congeners,  a  representative  congener  at each



degree of chlorination was chosen.  These concentration standards



are listed in Table 3-3.  GC/MS conditions used for  the analyses



are listed in Table 3-4.
                               29

-------
                                                               31




 Table  3-3.     PCB   congeners   used  as concentration calibration



                standards.








  Isomer group          Cogener  no.          Chlorine substitution








 Monochlorobiphenyl            1         2








 Dichlorobiphenyl              5         2,3








 Trichlorobiphenyl            29         2, 4, 5








 Tetrachlorobiphenyl          50         2, 2', 4, 6








 Pentachlorobiphenyl          87         2, 2', 3, 4, 5








 Hexachlorobiphenyl          154         2, 2', 4, 4', 5, 6








 Heptachlorobiphenyl         188         2, 2', 3, 4', 5, 6,6








 Octachlorobiphenyl          200         2, 2', 3, 3', 4, 5',6, 6








Nonachlorobiphenyl          	              	








Decachlorobiphenyl          209         2,  2',  3,  3',  4,  4',




                                             5, 5' , 6, 6'



Internal standard: Chrysene -diz






                               30

-------
                                                               82




 Table  3-4.  CC/MS conditions for PCB analysis












 Instrument:  Finnigan 4530 CC/MS








 GC Conditions








   Column:                    30  m  x  0.32  mm i.d. SE-54 fused



                              silica capillary column








   Temperature programming:   Inject  at  80°C  and  hold  1 min;




                              increase at  30°C/min to 160°C,  and



                              then at 3°C/min to 290«C








   Injector temperature:      235°C








   Carrier gas:               UHP Helium








MS Conditions (70eV electron impact)








   Mass range:                 m/z 35 to 510 scanned every second








   Resolution:                 Unit








   Source temperature:         120°C



   Emission current:           0.25 mA






                               31

-------
                                                               33
 Total  Chloride  by  Ion  Chromatography  (Method 300.0)








     Method  300 is an  ion chromatographic  method applicable to




 the determination  of  chloride  anion  in  drinking water, surface




 water,  and mixed domestic and industrial  wastewater.  Typically,




 a  small  volume of  sample (2  to 3 ml) is introduced into an ion




 chromatograph.    The  anions  of  interest   are  separated  and




 measured, using a system compromised of a guard column, separator




 column, suppressory column,  and  conductivity  detector.   Total




 chloride is  determined by retention-time matching and quantified




 using   a  response  factor  established  by  standards  of  known




 concentration.








 Total Organic Halogen  (TOX)








     TOX samples were  determined by two methods, depending on the




 halogen contents.    While  Sample  RCL-la  (ERCO  ID  32448) was




 analyzed  directly  on  the  Dohrman  TOX  analyzer  due  to  the




 relatively low  concentration of  total  organic  halogen present,




 the  remaining   charcoal  tube  samples  were  analyzed  by  ion




chromatography.








Method A:   Dohrman TOX Analyzer









     The charcoal tubes were pyrolyzed  in  the  Dohrman  and the






                               32

-------
                                                               34




 resulting  pyrosates were detected by micro-coulometry.








 Method  B:   Ion Chromatography








     Representative  aliquots  of  the charcoal-tube samples were



 extracted  with hexane to  separate the  organic halogen compounds



 from the   inorganic halogens.  The hexane fraction containing the



 organic halogen compounds  was  then  placed  into  a  Parr Bomb.



 Under   high  pressure  oxidative conditions, the organic halogens



 were converted into their  corresponding  inorganic  salts.   The



 halogens   were  then  determined  by  ion chromatography,  and the



 results calculated back to ug chloride per sample.








 PCDD/PCDF  by GC/MS (Method 613)








     Method 613 was used  for the  GC/MS characterization  of the



 PCDD/PCDF  in  the  incinerator  ash  and  flue gas samples.  The



 method was  slightly modified  such that  it was  amenable to the



 analysis of PCDF and also PCDD at various levels of chlorination.



 If  the    analysis  indicate   the  potential   presence  of  the



 tetrachloroisomers,  the  method  requires  that the samples.then



 have  to   be  reanalyzed  using  different  GC/MS  conditions  to



determine  the  presence of  the 2,3,7,8 - TCDD and 2,3,7,8 - TCDF




 isomers.   Because of the  extreme  toxicity  of  these compounds,



 they  are  of  environmental  concern  even  at  very low levels.




Therefore,   analytical  methods  must   not  only   be  extremely






                               33

-------
                                                                        85
         sensitive but  also generate  highly reliable results.  For these
         reasons, high resolution gas  chromatography/electron impact mass
 i
         spectrometer operated  in the selected ion mode was employed.  In
 i        order to monitor the  efficiency  of  the  sample  extraction and
 i        recovery procedures,  surrogates containing 37C1-TCDD were added.
         For these analyses, l3C-TCDD and 1'C-TCDF  were used  as internal
 I        standards.
 t
 ,        Gravimetric Determinations - Particulate Matter

 i
         Particulate  matter  in  the  probe-rinse and filter samples were
 I        determined according  to  the  method  discussed  in  the Federal
         Registrar 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Reference Method 5.
 t
 i
 j        3.3.4 Quality Assurance/Quality Control

 I             QA/QC  specified  in  the  U.  S.  EPA  methods were used as
         guidelines for  the  analyses  of  the  samples.  For  the sample
 |        preparation steps,   this included  the addition  of method blanks
 I        and duplicates  where applicable  (e. g.,  adequate sample size).
         Surrogate compounds  were also added to monitor the efficiency of
 I        sample extraction and recovery in the GC/MS analyses.
              Method Blanks
 I
              Blanks  are  processed   through   the   sample  preparation
         procedures to account for any sample contamination which might be

!                                   '    3,

-------
                                                               36





 introduced in  the laboratory.   At  least one  method blank will



 accompany  each   set  of   actual  samples  through  the  entire




 analytical scheme.
Duplicate Samples








  A duplicate sample is a  second  aliquot  of  a  sample carried



through all  sample preparation and analysis procedures to verify



the precision of the analytical method.  At  least one  sample in



each analysis batch has been analyzed in duplicate.
     All of  the analytical  instruments were calibrated prior to




sample   analyses.      This   included   performing  multi-level




calibration and evaluating the response factors on a daily basis.




For the  GC/MS  analyses,  the  instruments  were  also  tuned to




decaflurotriphenylphosphine  (DFTPP)  at  the  beginning of every




shift.
                               35

-------
                                                               87




 4.  Presentation and Discussion  of  Results



      A total  of six test  runs were conducted  during  the  three day



 sampling  program.  Air  sampling  for particulate matter  and  organic



 species was conducted  in   conjunction  with  five  of  these tests.



 Monitoring for  these species was not conducted during  Run  #  4 due



 to  scheduling constraints.  Solid sampling,  as well  as continuous



 monitoring  to   demonstrate combustion  efficiency,  howe\er, were



 conducted during all of   the tests.  The results  of the sampling



 and analytical  program are  provided below.



 SOLID  AKD LIQUID SAMPLES



     Waste feed materials  for  the test program  were  provided in



 three  sealed  55 gal. drums, each   containing  soils   with distinct



 levels  of  PCB contamination.  The following Table provides the



 results of analyses, conducted  prior to  the start of the sampling



 program   and  indicates   the  appropriate   test run  for each feed



 mixture.



     Feed Mixture         PCB-Concentration  (ppm)     Test Run



          1                   4889                   2,3,4,6



          2                     321                     1



          3                     502                     5



 The results of  analysis for the  composite  samples   of waste feed



 collected  during   the  course  of  each  of  the  test  runs are



 presented in Table  4-1.   The results   from  these  analyses  ranged




 from 54-2,970 ppm of total PCB.  These  values  provide comparative,




 averaged concentrations   of  2,790,  65,  and 400   ppm  for feed



mixtures  1,  2, and  3 respectively.






                                36

-------
                                                                                                      88
                                                     TABU 4-1
                                    PCB DITBBHINATION II VASTI FIID HATIBIALS
                               GC/NS HBTBOD (80; CONCBNTBATION IN PPH,  OET  VT.  (if/k()
1
1
! SAMPLE ID:
! SAHPLB 10:
i
[
i
;ci(i)-pcB
!C1(2)-PCB
!C1(3)-PCB
!C1(4)-PCB
!C1(5|-PCB
!C1(()-PCB
!C1(7)-PCB
!C1(I)-PCB
;C1(9)-PCB
!C1(10)-PCB
i
JTOTAl PCB
l
!! BBCOVBBT SUBBOGATB
|TBBPBBNTL-D(14)

IF-1
32430



ID
7
21
IB
0.(
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID

53. (


49

IF-2
32431



4B
740
10(0
770
170
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID

2790


110

ir-3
32432



30
(SO
1000
710
1(0
5.4
ID
ID
ID
ID

25(0


B(

IF-4
32433



50
770
1200
790
1(0
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID

2970


130

IF-5
32434



3.4
71
200
110
15
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID

400


130

VM
32435



27
740
1100
BIO
1(0
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID

2B40


1(0
IBCO
BLANI
3243(



ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID

ID


91
IF-1
BBBUI
B32430



ID
11
35
30
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID

7(


43
i


DBTBCTION
LIHIT

2.5
2.5
2.5
5.0
5.0
5.0
7.5
7.5
7.5
12.5





ID: IOT DBTBCTID.

-------
                                                               89
     The waste   feed sample from Run 1 was re-analyzed due to the



 unexpectedly  low concentrations  of  PCBs  encountered.  The re-



 analysis  provided  a  result  of  76 ppm, validating the initial




 value. The surrogate recovery for these  samples  (  43 and  49%  )



 are  appropriate  to  demonstrate  that the sample extraction and



 analysis procedures were proper.



     Surrogate recoveries for the  remaining  waste  feed samples



 ranged from   86  - 190 \, with the higher values likely reflecting



 the coelution of interfering materials due to the  complex nature



 of the sample matrix.



     Table 4-2   presents the  results of analysis for the treated



 soil samples. No detectable levels of  any PCB  isomer group were



 found in  the samples.  The detection  limit varied for each test



 run depending upon the composition of the associated  waste feed.



 The analytical  detection limits  for test  runs 2, 4,  and 5 were



 determined to be 2.4 ppb as a result of the presence of  Cli -Cls



 in the  waste feed for that run. Detection limits for test runs  1



 (C12 - C15)  and 3 (Cli - Cl«)  are 2.4 and 3.4 ppb respectively.



     Surrogate recoveries for these samples ranged from 46 - 87%.



Triplicate analyses of samples from test run 5  provided recovery



data of 46,7 54 and 61X.




     As  discussed  previously,   a  single  composite  sample  of




scrubber  effluent  was  submitted  for  analysis  for  PCBs.  As



indicated in Table 4-3, No detectable concentrations of PCBs were



found in the sample.  A worst case detection limit ,  assuming the






                               38

-------
                                                               90




presence of  Cli -  Cl«, was calculated to be 0.34 ppb.  Surrogate



recoveries for  this sample were 110%.




Flue Gas




     The results of the  gravimetric analysis  of the particulate




samples collected  using the  EPA Method 5 train are presented in




Table 4-4. The particulate emissions ranged  from 0.015  to 0.055




gr/dscf when  corrected to  7% 0*  with an average value of 0.029




gr/dscf.




     The impinger  catches from  this sampling  were subjected to




total chloride  analysis in  order to  quantify the HCL emissions




from the incinerator. Table 4-5 indicates  that the HCL emissions




from the system were less than 408 mg/hr in all cases.




     The  results   of  the  continuous  emissions  sampling  are




summarized in Table 4-6. The calculated combustion efficiency was




>  99.9%  in each  of the test runs. The fixed gas concentrations,




Oi and CO were reasonably  consistent  throughout  each   test run




with  the  exception  of  Run  5.   In  this  instance, the oxvgen




concentration was highly variable,  ranging  from  3.2  to 12.2%,




with  two  significant  declines,  approaching but never exceeding




the permit action level.  Figure  4-1  presents  the  strip chart




tracings of  oxygen concentrations  for run  1 compared to a more




typical pattern as evidenced in the other test runs.
                               39

-------
                                                                                     •OU3I1SQ 101 :

















HI1
DliSQ





IS

ON


QR
OR
OR
QR
QH
QR
OH
OR
OR
OR


91/6/1

9HZt


UT3IUIU
S-TI
19

OH


OR
OR
OR
OH
OR
OH
QR
OH
QR
QH


91/6/1

smt


BlT3Hd(
J-TI
IB

OH


OH
OR
OR
OR
OR
OH
OR
OR
OR
OH


91/6/1

mzt


1Q 1RT1B
0311
IB

QH


OH
QH
QR
OH
OR
OH
OH
OR
OR
QR


9B/6/1

mzt


9-TI

9»

OR


QR
OR
Qfl
QH
QR
QR
QR
QR
QR
QH


9I/B/1

twt


S-TI

ts

QH


QR
QH
QR
QR
OH
QR
OR
OR
OR
OR


98/1/1

zwt


»-TI

69

QH


OH
QH
QH
QH
OR
QR
OR
QH
OR
OH


9B/6/1

mzt


t-TI

01

OR


QH
QR
OH
QR
QR
QR
OH
QH
QR
OR


9B/6/1

owt


Z-TI

Bl

OH


QH
QH
QH
QR
OH
OH
Qfl
QH
QR
QH


9B/6/1

6t)Zt


I-TI

(HlO-llHIBdlll!
UTOOTinS 11SAOOI! S!
B3d ITlOi:
i

I3d-
-------
                                                                     92
                           TABLE 4-3
          PCB DETERMINATION IN THE SCRUBBER EFFLUENT -
          GC/KS KETHOD 680; CONCENTRATION IN PPB (ul/ll
1
; SAMPLE ID:
! SAMPLE NO:
;
t
*
IC1W-PCB
!C1(2)-PCB
!C1(3|-PCB
!C1(4)-PCB
:C1|5)-PCB
ICK6I-PCB
!C1(T)-PCB
!C1(8}-PCB
;C1(9}-PCB
!C1(10)-PCB
! TOTAL PCB
!5 RECOVERY SURROGATE
!TERPHBNYL-D(14)
vunruoiiA wr
SB-2,4,6
32461


ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
MD
ND
ND

no


DETECTION
LIMIT
0.02
0.04
0.04
0.08
0.08
0.08
0.12
0.12
0.12
0.18



ND: NOT DETECTED.

-------
         TABLE 4-4
RESULTS OF GRAVIMETRIC ANALYSES
                                                    93
RUN 1235
TOTAL PASTICULATE (KG) 30,2 115, T 44,7 77.5
SAMPLE VOLUME (DSCP) 45.796 48.916 36,116 39.107
GRAIN LOADING (GR/DSCF) 0.01 0,036 0.019 0,031
GRAIN LOADING (GR/DSCF) 0.015 0.055 0,023 0.037
X OIYGEN
6
14.1
19.72
0.011
0.017

         TABLE 4-5
  RESULTS OF BCL ANALYSES
i 	 •
! BUN
! CHLORIDE CONC.IMP.dl/1)
ilMPIHGBB VOL, (•!)
! SAMPLE VOL. (dicf)
ICHLOEIDB CONC.GAS
! (il/iS)
!VOL. FLOVRATE (i3/kr)
!ECL EMISSIONS (Ib/kr)
1
(3
676
45,796

(2
92
(0.0004
2
(3
571
48.916

(1
130
(0.0003
3
(3
400
36.116

(1
69
(0.0001
5
9
493
39.107

4
100
0.0009
6 !
(6
322
19.72

(4
67
(0.0005

-------
           TABLE 4-6
SUNNART OP CONTINUOUS EMISSION
       MONITORING RESULTS

RUN

1
2
3
4
5
C
PABTS PEB MILLION
TIME

1455-lflO
1153-1253
1515-1645
1T15-1T45
1050-1300
1530-1625

AVG
92.2
114
79.9
SO. T
81.1
(4.5
NOi

(19.
(14.
(62.
111.
(66.
(S3.

RANGE
8-95)
9-10?)
3-73.6}
4-96.6)
0-93,0)
0-66.0)
CO
AVG
12.5 (9.
26.6 (24
10.6 (10
7.47 (6.
3.35 (2.
2.4 (2.

RANGE
2-17.2)
.4-33.5)
.1-12.3)
76-T.84)
44-4.88)
4-2.9)



8

02
AVG
.96 (8
12.2 (8
8
9
6
9
.58 (6
.63 (8
.92 (3
.49 (6


----------- ,
C02
RANGE
.05-11.7)
.74-11.61
.5-13.0)
.5-10.75)
.22-12.2)
.5-11.8)
AVG
8.65 (6
8.6? (8
9.78 (7
9.13 (8
10.3 (8
9.22 (8
RANGE
.0-9.10)
.0-8.96)
.76-10.9)
.25-9.90)
.46-11.7)
.3-10.8)
                                                                          VO

-------
                                                                        95
 i             Nox concentrations for the individual test  runs ranged from

         62.35 - 107.5 ppm with an average value of 86.5 ppm.

 I             Table 4-7  presents the  results of the RCL analyses f~r the

 I        flue gas samples. Results for the collected samples  ranged from-
 *
         121.7  to  289.8  ug/m3.  Separate  analyses  of  the primary and

 j        secondary  sorbent  tubes  from  test  run  1  indicate efficient

         collection of the chlorinated organic species,  94.9% of the total

 !
 i        mass was collected on the primary tube.

 i             The results  of  PCB  analysis  of  the  collected  flue gas

         samples are  presented in  Table 4-8.  With the exception of teat

 i        run 5,  no detectable amounts of any isomer group were detected in

         the samples.  A total of 5.5 ug of PCB was detected in the extract
 i

         from test run 5. The  flue  gas  concentration  of  PCBs  in this

 i        instance  is   2.4  ug/m3  and  is most likely associated with the

         documented periods of low  excess oxygen  encountered during this

         test.  These  results demonstrate  that an  action limit above the

         specified level  for these  tests should  be initiated  for future

!        tests.  Indications from these tests are that excess oxygen values

(        in  excess,  of  5.0  % should  be adequate  to ensure  the requisite
i
         levels  of destruction.


              The calculated  destruction .and removal efficiencies for the

         test  runs  are presented in Table 4-9. With the  exception  of test

|        run 5,   as  discussed  above,  The  DREs were  calculated using the

         analytical  detection limits for  the samples.   The sensitivity of


         these  limits  was inhibited by the presence of a matrix



                                        45

-------
                                                                             96
                      TABLE  4-7
TOTAL CHLORINATED ORGANIC CONCENTRATION  IN  THE  FLUE  GAS
SAHPLE NO
32448
32449
32450
32451
32452
CLIENT ID
RCL-la
ECL-lb
RCL-3
ECL-5
BCL-6
UG/SAHPLE
16500
890
8600
7300
10500
SANPLE
VOLUME
(LITERS)
26,9
...
20.8
20,8
8,7
CONCENTRATION
(UG/1)
646
...
414
351
1210

-------
                                                                                                         97
                                                    TAIL! 4-1
                                    PCB DITmiXATION IN FUJI CAS SANPLIS
                                 CC/HS RgTBOD  (10; CONCMTBATION IN NC/SAHPLI
1
1
! SAHPLI ID:
! SARPLI 10:
|
:
:ci(i}-pci
!C1(2)-PC1
JC1I3I-PCB
ICK4I-PCB
:C1(5)-PCB
!Cl(f)-PCB
!C1(7)-PCB
;C1(I)-PCB
!C1(!)-PCB
!C1(10)-PCI
; TOTAL PCI
1
< * ***** *" "«»••«•••"*""»"«
!I HCOTIiT SVUOCATI
!TIIPHNTL-D(14)

IUI-1
32413


ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID



S3

IUI-2
32414


ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID



19

IUI-3
32415


ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID



66

BOI-5
32416


ID
1100
3200
SOO
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
S.5



12

EMM
32417


ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID



4

PBB 2
324!0


ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID



71
nco
BLAH
324S2


ID
ID
' ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID



J7
mm
BUN s
K324K


ID
1100
3300
100
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID


********

70



DITKCTION
LIMIT
190
2)0
370
75
75
75
110
110
110
110





ID: 107 DITICTID.

-------
                                                                            TABLE  4-9

                                                                   DESTRUCTION  AND REMOVAL
                                                                           EFFICIENCIES
TEST RUN
VASTE PEED
PCI concentration(uf/f)
Feed rate(lb/kr|
FLUE GAS
PCI conceBtration(n|/i3)
Flov rate(i3/kr)
Deitrietioi tod leioval(l)
1

76.0
115.4

< 314.34
92.75
> 99.999 t
2

2790
61.5

< 709.73
11.4.94
> 99.9|9990
3

2560
61.5

< 946.16
55.93
> 99.99993
4

2970
61.5

NA
NA
NA
5

400
106.4

2416.32
81.22
99.9989 tt
6

2840.0
79.8

< 1719.47
51.36
) 99.99991
t Required DRE lot iet due to liiited
     analytical detection liiit

It LON DRR it doe to periodi of  oper-
     ation Nitk secondary ckaiber oiyjen
     lereli approackinf tke pernit condition
     of 31 eicen
                                                                                                                                   00

-------
                                                                                 •frer Ar.iiys s


                                           A-i                     S-rutr-T rtfii?nT                       Flu" Ga:
                              Tlri' i •.       'i"\'           ''jn.-T'.nti'n       Liait           Concentntirn
                              • rtbi            rrh               :rr'  '           Irpt.i               ipph
innr
   Tf ••>                         I               • .  •.                'i.               I.i"                Jil'
   :,.r--i                         '.'•                .-                ';'                !.i                1t»
                                                . ./  •              '-.                   I                If-
   —.-,                         •                 .?•,                !..                I.*                I.!'
                                ».•               ...L                ':•                -.a                T
                                                                                      .^*                Ki1               '-••'«  i
                                                                                       i                ND                l.J
                                                                                      I.i                Jil1                2.'  ;
                                                                                                        MI
                                                                                                                                                      VO

-------
                                                                                                12
                                                                                                     0
                                                                                                     x
                                                                                                     y
                                                                                                     g
                                                                                                     e
                                                                                                     n
                                                                                                     C
                                                                                                     o
                                                                                                     n
                                                                                                     c.
End
  60 min.

Run Time
Start
                                                           — — -   Test Run 3
                                                                -   Test Run 5
Comparison of Oxygen Concentrations in the Flue Gas
                                                     FIGURE
                                                      4-1
                                                                                                        o
                                                                                                        o

-------
                                                                        101


          interference in the samples.  The interfering compounds  have been

 ,        tentatively   identified   as    tri-methyl    silicon   polymers.

         Investigations  are  currently  under  way  to  determine   if the


 '-        interference is the result of  sampling train contamination  or an


 !        artifact of the process.
 i
              The detection  limits were sufficient to demonstrate  DREs in
 I
 '•        excess of 99.9999% for all runs with the  exception  of Run 1.  The

         high detection  limit and  unexpectedly low concentration  of PCBs


 •        in  the  waste  feed  for  this  test  were  only   appropriate to

         demonstrate a  DRE of  >99.999%.  Reviews  of the  operational  data,
 i
 I
         temperature profiles and excess air rates,  for this  test indicate

 I        that there is no reason not to expect that the required  degree of

         destruction was not achieved.

 I           DRE calculations performed  for  the individual   isomer groups


         indicate that efficiencies in  excess of 99.9999  were  achieved  for


         the primary constituent groups (C12-C14)  for  test  runs  2,  3  and


 i

              The concentrations  of PCBs  detected in the flue gas  samples

 1        from Run 5  provide for a calculated DRE of  99.9989%.  As  discussed

         previously,  this  value is  most likely related to upset conditions

         in  the  secondary   combustion  chamber  and   does not provide an

,        accurate evaluation of the systems  capabilities.


              The results   of the  dioxin  screens   of the effluent  process


I        streams  from  the   incinerator   are   presented in   Table  4-10.  A


i         weighted composite  sample of  incinerator ash and flue gas sample

         from  a  single  test run (*6)  were  submitted  for   PCDD  and PCDF



                                        50

-------
                                                               102





analyses (tetra-octa isomers). As indicated in the Table, none of



these constituents were detected at levels above 4.3  ng/g and 34




ug/m3 for  the ash and flue gas samples respectively. The results



from similar analyses conducted on the composite sample  from the



scrubber effluent stream have not been completed at this time and



will be forwarded within  the next  two weeks.  It is anticipated



that the  levels of these constituents will be ND given their low



solubilities in water and the fact that they were not  present in



any of the other process streams.
                               51

-------
                                                                     103
        fable 4-10



Sumrj of PCDO and PCDF Confener  analysis





Diozins
Tetra
Penta
leza
Hepta
Octa
Puraai
Tetra
Peata
leza
lepta
Octa
3T
S accuracy: Cl-TCDD
Incinerator
Coiposite

Concentration
(ppb)

ID
ID
ID
ID
ID

ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
122
1th

Detection
Liiit
(ppb)

0.1
1.1
O.iS
0.99
4.3

0.012
1.2
0.2T
O.Tt
2.2

Flue Gas


Concentration
Uf/i3)

ID
ID
ID
ID
ID

ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
123


Detection
Liiit
(•f/i3)

0.38
1.1
2.0
(.1
34


1.5
1.9
3.6
2T


-------
                                           104
APPENDIX A

-------
                                                                                                                    105
  •SUITS OF Flown in ISOIIIITIC CALCUUTIOI
 EDI ionn
 DATE OF EDI
 CLOCI TIO: IlITIiL
 CL0CE TIB: FI1AL

 A?G. STiCl TIIPIEiTDEI
 A»G. SQUAEI DELTA t
 IOZZLE DIABTBB
 BAEOMETBIC PBB3SUBB
 SAKPLIIG Tin
 SAMPLE VOUfflK
 4IG. IETEB TBHP,
 A?G. DELTA I
 DGI CALIB. FACTOB (T]
 VATH COLLECTED
 COZ
 01
 CO
 12
 STiCl ABEA
 STATIC PEESSDBI
 PITOT COEFFICIEIT
 SAMPLE fOLDIE DBT
 •'TEE AT STD.
  ,STU!I
 IDLE FBACTIOI DET GAS
 IOLICULA1 IT.DET
 HCBSS AIB
 WLBCULAB Tt.  1ST
 STACI GAS PEESSUEE
 STACI rELOCITT
 VOLUIETEIC PLOKATS, DET STD.
 VOLUMETRIC FLOW ATI, ACTUAL
 ISOIIKKTIC EATIO
                 PAETICULATE TESTS
mm
mm
mm
mm
DECEEES F
IICBES 120
IICIES
II. 1C.
HI.
CUBIC F1ET
DEGEEES F
II. 120
mm
IILLITEES
PEECEIT
PEECIIT
PEECEIT
PEECIIT
SQUAEE IICIES
IICBES 120.
turn
DSCF
SCF
PEECEIT
mm
LB/LB BOL1
PIBCEIT
LB/LB IDLE
IICBES 1C.
AFPI
DSCFI
ACFI
PEECEIT
11
5-11-St
1457
HOT
ITS
o.si
1.11
2J.J5
TO. 00
48. ZS
78
l.TO
1.00
TS1.S
S.IO
11.10
0.00
12.4
11.04
0.00
0.14
45.7)8
37.32
44.)
o.ss
29.40
11S.8
24.21
Z).)5
2455
K
IBB
101.0
ZB
5-14-88
11S1
1252
173
0.7(
0.31
30.00
10
4S.4SO
7!
Z.S7
1.00
SS4.
s.
11.
0.
IZ.
11.04
0.00
O.B4
48.S1C
27.54
38.0
0.84
21.40
111.8
2S.2)
30.00
2SS1
123
22!
!4.7
31
S-14-S8
1513
1653
174
0.3S
0.31
30.00
100
38.SZO
IZ
0.80
1.00
405.8
1.0
J.5
0.0
IZ.5
11.04
0.00
0.14
38.118
1S.1Z
34.8
0.85
2S.88
77.4
25. J 2
30.00
15Z8
84
117
10.8
SI
5-15-18
1051
11S1
171
0.80
0.31
30.0)
80
3).Z70
74
0.80
1.00
500.8
t.O
J.5
0.0
12.5
11.04
0.00
1.14
3).107
23.10
37.8
0.8Z
2).88
77.4
Z5.Z7
30.Q)
Z38I
)4
112
)l.8
8B
5-15-88
153Z
16Z3
178
0.33
0.31
30.0)
51
Z0.030
10
0.50
1.00
1Z4.I
8.)
11.7
0.0
11.4
11.04
0.00
0.84
D.7ZO
5. II
Z3.0
0.77
Z).57
11). 5
21. Jl
30.0)
1Z60
8Z
)7
11.7
PAETICULATE  LOADI1C

PAETICDLATI  BASS
PAETICDLATI  LOADIIC
PAETICULATI  LOAD 11C
     Corrected To 7 I Oiyje»
     •I
ir/dicf
fr/dicf
30. ZO
0.010
0.015
115.70
 0.038
 0.055
44.70
0.01)
O.OZ3
77.50
0.031
0.037
14.10
0.011
0.017

-------
                                                                                                                    106
 "'SDLT3  OP PLOIBATI AID ISOIIIITIC CALCULATIOI   PCB TtSTS
 in
 DAT! OF BUI
 CLOU TIM: IIITIAL    '
 CLOCI TID: PIIAL

 AYC.  STACI TIIPIBATUU
 AVC.  SQDAU DILTA P
 IOZZLI DIAHTEE
 BABOUTKIC PUSSUU
 SANPLIIG Till
 SAMPLI round
 AVG.  nm TUP.
 AVG.  DILTA I
 DCI CALII. PACTOB |T]
 HATH COLLICT1D
 CO  2
 0 2
 CO
 I 2
 STACI  ABIA
 STATIC PBISSUU
 PITOT  COIPFICIBIT
 SAMPLE fOLURI DBT
 *ATIB  AT STD.
  ISTDU
 BOLE PBACTIOI DBT GAS
 IOLICULAB W.DBT
 EICKS3 ill
 NOLICULAB IT.  «IT
 STACI  GAS PBISSDU
 STACI  TBLOCITT
 VOLUN8TBIC FLOVBATK, DBT STD.
 VOLUMETRIC FLOVBATI, ACTDAL
 ISOIIIBTIC BATIO
 COMBUSTION IPPICIIICT
mm
ttttu
ttttlt
tsstst
DEGBBES F
IICUS 120
[ICIIS
II. 1C.
HI.
CUBIC PUT
DECRIES F
II. 120
tutst
IILLITIU
PIBCIIT
PIBCIIT
PPI
PIBCIIT
SQUAB! IICIIS
IICBIS 120.
tttttt
DSCF
SCF
PIBCIIT
tttttt
LB/LB IOLI
PIBCIIT
LB/LB IOL!
IICIIS IG.
AFPI
DSCFI
ACFI
PIBCIIT
PIBCIIT
1A
5-13-IS
1456
1T05
IT!
0.12
fl.Jl!
13.35
120
11.271
11
l.TS
1.01
134S.S
l.i
9.0
12. 5
12.4
7.0S
0.00
0.14
13.503
(3.44
43.2
0.5T
33.24
TO.I
26.66
23.35
23SS
SS
11T
111.3
33.33
2A
5-14-16
1153
12S3
1T3
O.Ti
0.313
30.00
(0
50.360
IS
2.C4
1.01
{99.
1.
12.
26.
T9.
7.06
0.00
0.14
50.321
32.36
39.1
0.60
3T.33
140. 5
23 68
30.00
2T61
ii
13S
101.3
99. 9T
3A
5-H-I6
1513
164T
1T4
I.3T
0.319
30.00
94
41.29S
IS
0.60
1.01
646.
9.
1.
10.
11.
T.OI
0.00
0.14
40.STS
30.41
42.9
O.ST
32.18
iS. 4
26.50
30.00
1424
33
TO
114. S
99.99
SA
5-15-16
10S1
1301
1T9
O.S9
0.319
30.09
120
11.314
T9
1.S9
1.01
1404.
10.
(.
3.
12.
T.Oi
0.00
0.14
11.292
66.24
44.9
o.ss
30. IS
46.1
2S.09
30.09
2339
S3
us
114.0
99.99T
(A
5-15-86
1S32
1(23
1T2
0.33
0.319
30.09
SO
21.004
13
o.so
1.01
330.8
9.2
3.5
2.40
11.3
T.0(
0.00
0.84
20.771
15.60
42.9
O.ST
30.52
T9.4
25. IS
30.09
1299
31
(4
120.0
99.99T
DISTBUCTIOI AID UIOfAL IFFICIIICT (DU)

IASTI PUD BAT!                       Ib/kr         US.4          (l.S          (l.S         106.4          79.8
VAST! RED COICIHTBATIOI -PCB          ppi          7(.0        2790.0        2560.0         400.0        2140.0
'UH GAS AIALTSIS -PCB                  •(    <    73S.O    <   1000.0    (   107S.O        SSOO.O    (   1000.0
  iS BATI - II                        tl/kr      3.98I*0(      7.781407      7.141*07      1.931*07      1.031*08
•ASSBATI-ODT                       U/kr    <    23.16    <    81.57    <    S2.92        213.17    <    88.31
DBI                                perceit    > 99.99927    ) 99.99990    ) 99.99993      99.99890    >"99.99991

-------
                                                        107
••t
 h
i
 \
       I-
           ji-B
           *  -
            I'!

5? S
^t*«
il i
                 8
•S «o
VTi x»
                     i- C
         Q\ O
            QQ
            «Ti

            C)
                   8
           8
            •v
            O
     ex
     SiqjoUi «
     v»jvo|^'|

2



i
                                        s
                                        e n
                                         • *
                                        III
                                         I

                                       ill-
                                        8
                                        **
                                          1  1

                                          0  0
                                             8
              'i'
              *   s
                si
                              J
                              It
                                     S?
                                  !
                                 &
                                >ii
                                • w •
                              « 9 * "5
                              eliii
                    I
                    5t
                    u
                    i!
                                      ..
                                      < n
                               i
                               i

-------
                                                                   METHOD 5 MODULI CALIBRATION
        0»«
                                              NO
                                    .    P-8
      «*>«       Erik
ClIRCKi
BAROMETRIC 1
e,
MODULE
OKI rice
SCTTIMQ
Alt
Un.itjO)
. *
/.O
A 5

30




PRESSURE 1
J «

VolUM
V,
utj)
£
$
/o
/O
/O




*
r.ll
ST
Fa
/.<



v.




*a?
O
AHOARC
etor
to/



/




'. *V in Ha
^_" *"V<
> METER
Temperature
te
7?
77
^•^
7^.5
7^.5




STANDARD »
Tv.\^

(in. HjOl
"•L
-Ao
-/•A
-A 6
~_?.J



1
tCTER .


VoluM
(rtji
V- K
±L*J5
1'fS
?•?•)"
9.f{




f

MODULE
Te«pei
t»l
7?
K

7*
*?£




7. 6?,

METER
raturaa
7f>
7$
77
77
•76




>


•Tine
(•In)
/S._k>
9.5"5
jZ-df
tJ.Lt
f/./f

AVERAGE:





T
/.oo
/.Of
I-&I
/.•f
/.OO

/,«/





AHa
(In. H_OI
A/?
fl.OJT
*-<>£
$. of
t'°*

3..OS

•



Module.
riowrate
a
(scral





•


.
•


or






•


             CHECK. USC TMC AVEKACX Alia FOR AH
               ' •  v
                           *  >*
                                      * 460' r*
                              All > (t  » «60»
                 " MO-P>»> *"  I  ljt» * <60)  • 1
                '   Irb (t* * 460)1  I   V. »»      I


                                      » #  AH     I
                                          U.t     I
                                      tM * 4601  9 I
AN*
 0   •  f U7.«4» Vto
or   •  orifice rector -l(t»
                                                  11
                                         * «60) All I
                                       rt         J
  Correlation Line Equation
    Q • • (Or) «• b

    Q -        or * 	
                                                                                           ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA f


                                                                                           Bach T mamt b> l.OO ^ O.01
                                                                                           Avaraqa AHa miat b« T.V4 » O.J5
                                                                                           Each AHa «u«t  b« wlthLa o7lS
                                                                                            of th« av«ra-]«  Alia
TC Readout Calibrated with Constant Voltage Source
tail ___2____°r   tiao _23L__°P    Reference Therva
Module Leak Check 	  t^	
                                                                                                     ter
                                                                                                   Probe Heater Low Control
                                                              Heater to* Love Control OK      _
                                                              Nodule Cleaned  	j^    Pitot tube manometer leak check
                                                 Calibrated and Checked by
                                                 Reviewed by __________
                                                                                           Date
                                                                                                Date
                                                                                                                                                      O
                                                                                                                                                      oo

-------
                                 TRC
                NOZZLE CALIBRATION DATA SHEET
                                                                       109
NOZZLE SET NO
PATF
                                              TECHNICTAM
NOZZLE NO.      DIAMETER'
                                                                AVERAGE**
                                                                0,117
                              O.2OO
   3-2
                                                   O.Z57
                                                    0,-74-H-
  •5-7
 * Measure to nearest .001"
 • Three measurements must be within .004" of each other

-------
                                                       DATE
                                                                              110
                    INSPECTION   REPORT
                               ELFRED MACHINE  COMPANY
                                         CUSTOMER P.O. NO.
                                          PURCHASED FROM
S.O. NUMBER
PART NO.
TOOL NO.
NO. PIECES ORDERED
PART NAME
TOOL NAME
NO. PIECES RECEIVED
     /(/rt
 lit PIECE INSPECTION
 PARTIAL INSPECTION
 COMPLETE INSPECTION

-------
                                                               i i www«u< ^ !>« ,  | / J-Q i X
                                                               Revision No.     T
                                                               Date  December 9. 1980
                                                               Page         of
                 S-TYPE PITOT GEOMETRIC CALIBRATION
                       PART 2 -  PITOT ALIGNMENT
TRC Probe Identification  	
Technical  Specialist	£
Date  	   2^
                                                  P1tot Identification
                                                                              m
     A.
 \
.J
        Transverse
        Tube Axis
     B.
        Longitudinal
        Tube
        Axis
                    M
                          &
                                   c i.m
                              8 STfeH
                              i1 £035
                               b
                               c
                                   e1  Qt.54
                               f V.
                                                o.
                                                   a* +_b* -
                                                       Zab
     2ad


 (80° < 8  <  100°;
(80° < 8'  <  100°)


 a* + b2  • e2 .
     Zao~
                                                       2ao


                                                    (85° < 8 < 95°)
                                                   (85° < 8' < 95°)
NOTE:  values in parentheses are EPA Method 2 specifications.

               PROBE THERMOCOUPLE CALIBRATION
                                                 o-,
                                                             Tolerances
    Expected Stack Temperature (Ts)
    Mercury Thermometer (Tr
    Thermocouple Readout
    Probe Identification
    Technician  	
                                                      5R     (T$ i 105)
                                                      'R   (
                                                  Date
811-2

-------
                       S-TYPE  PITOT GEOMETRIC CALIBRATION

                          PART 1 - PROBE CONFIGURATION
  TRC Probe Identification    3Q(

  Technical Specialist

  Date
B.
C.(2)
                 Prob« •
                   OR
                  Probe
                                          Revision No.   	;
                                          Date   December 9,
                                          Page          of
                         P1tot Identification
                                                    Center
•
Probe
• •
L
P1tot

Nozzle C
.
t
t a <
") to
4
\
)
/"
'
Probe

Pi tot

X / ^S^
— - — — - / >

Ai
                                                                              112
                                                                               n
                                                      c
                                                      f
                              Specifications  (EPA Method 2)
Ot » 3/16" to 3/8'
Oj • 1/2"
 a i 3/4"
Ci3"
4 >r
                                                                   Pa " Pb
                                                               1.05  0  <  Pil.50 Dt
                                                                    L
         If these specifications  are met,  proceed with  Part 2 P1tot alignment.
 FORM 811-1

-------
                 u
                 r

.J51 H M

*:lf£
!Sf *f
 S  s
  U
  »>
8


J
     If
     D"
     rl
     n
 "If
        AA
          DL
         V


         *•
               V


               IN

     ff?
        N
  6d o) ^^

' • * *«




0 "
            SL>
             J.
                  CO

                  TT
           -A -O
               -C
               Ji_
               a/

                   Jb
                    C?

                     00
                     J
                   r-K
                   S
                     00
                     *•»


                     5
                     0
                    r*

^L
N

y
•^^•_

Ju
                          V
                            OB
                            0
                            CT
                              o
   *
                            Jb
     !
     &


                                  FI
                                  n
                                  •Sir-
                             PS
                                 met O 9 -a
                                  -I?
                                      K
                                 f
                                   SH
                                     ^ifr?
                                    irf ;s i
                                    a -a
                                     X1 * »

                                     If

                                                 o*
                                             F.
n'lhM*-
  !fr-|
 ,|.
  s
hK
            !


-------
nm
Plane
Tear Humor
                       Orifice No.   *DH
                       Altaic
Location
TO Pro
O"""-.
Tester
Ear. Fnen. 3O.eO
Proo* [dene. Mo-
Fllter [dene.
                                                  Mozzlatfa. CObu
                                                  AsauMd Moisture _
                                                  Tesc Duration
                                                                    In-
                                                                                    Cftcair
                                                                           Pitnc ft«-*«^
                                                                     (00
                                                                    •in.
                                                 .Trawrse- Paine Intern!
                                                 rrabe- Heater SectJiar-
                                                 Filter Too.
                                                       Mater
                                                                            •in.
                                                                  i .
                                                                           Tear Stare Tlae
                                                                           Tese Final Tla»
                                                                           Leak Tcsc Stare
                                                                           teak Teac Final
       Af \-
Port
         Mln.
             vctocicr
                        IH
                                     cue °?
                                    stack
                                    InlUJ
                                                       oe
                                                                Ca Saml*
                                                                 Voluae
                                                                 01. ft.
                                                     Cyc.
                                                    An^le
Heater
 Box
Teap.
 Of Gas
' Leznaf
Conoeruer
'.V
 InH,
                                                                                                           0),
           Id IWH I
                             •: ISW"
                                                                          O
                                                                                       U
              Will
              lUt! I
             114.1 I!
              I L|o|
         Wol I I I I I  II  I  I  I
H I I  I I 11 III  1  I  I
         I I 11 111 III  i  I  I
         I 111 i  II UN  I  I
         I 1111111II  !  I  I
         Hi 111111H 1 I  I
         MINIMI
          Illl HI6111
              Illl
              I  I
                         1  1
                               lebl
                      I  I  MM
                                M  M  II
                      I Mill
                        MM
                      (Mill
                                I  M  I  M
                                I  I  I  I  I  I
                       M  jST M
                       M  M  II
                                                      hhM-ui&UN-i-
                                             i\hN
                                                                        -I-
                                                          a«
-------
i  ::••'
       OP
          V3
Si
       Jfjji]
           v
       !!
       A Jl
            o
     «i»


iflM
0 B * ^ *•
c-
0
•


I
        •A
     8 1 D I§ H'S
     e c ii 4J P A

                      IF
                      &H
                      Itf
                     a. ef o •>
                       1*
                      i
                      So

                      I
                           Oi

                           GO
                   I,
                              Hi
                I
                ••^^
                I

                H
                r-
JD

••^
fO

00
                  a
                  VI
                  O
4
 V
IVJ

                                   rt
                                  £
                                  00
                       r
                       SB
                       00
                       ^^B
                       m
                                    E
T

                                         "3
                           TI
       OD
                           0?
                                      S5
                           TT'
                           2
           ro
v>
co
              "0
              S
             CO

           SIS
                      OO
                      mm^
                      >
                      ••^
                      r*
                                           o
                                           •3
                                                           "0

                               u.-
                               L^  -
                                 iS
                               B
                                                                 8~
                                                  H  1-
                                                  Iff fj
                                                  o o ^ 22
                                                  S-H H ^«3

-------
        • •. *t   v- •. .-
    —**9 •: •  i • .-«.-•  .
                                               FIELD DATA SHEEI
 Plant Location
'Tent Nu*ber
    Location
TRC Project No
Date   £)to'
Tester	
             VCl_
             Probe Ident. No.
             Filter Ident.
             Duct ATM
                                             ft«
                                     Nozzle No. I Dia.
                                     Assuaed Ibisnire m
                                     Test Duration
                                                                   \J
                              Traverse Point Interval,
                              Probe Heater Setting .	
                              Filter Te»p. Setting 	
                              Dry Gas Meter T ^_^^
                                                                      / 0
                                                                              in.
                                                                          in.
                                                            C Factor  ^^^^
                                                            Pilot Coefficient
                                                            Orifice AHt 	
                                                            Test Start Tl»e   JQ^l^
                                                            Test Final Tim   i«.g»l
                                                            Leak Test Start   O   QMt
                                                            Leak Test Final  O   CBM
                                                                                                        If "Hi
    Port
     taint
             3MI5I6I7UI9IR
             TUe
             Min.
              Veiocitr
                AP
              lnH,0
               I
                    tit 131 MUSIlil 19120H25I2IUSI2612712II29I30H32I3313413SMOI«U4?iOUJHSt50IS2l S3
             AH
           1*11,0
                 out °F
                                              in 8,0
                                Stack
                                 °F
                                       Gts Samole
                                         Voline
                                        cu. ft. '
                                                       Cyc.
                                                       Angle
Heater
.  tax
Teap.
 Tesip.
 of Gas
 Leavinf
Condenser
  •F
Plop
Vac.
in Hf
                                                                                                   Probe
°F
                                                                                            CO,
                        nnTTn
                                       11
                      1  hlil  I  I
                                I  Uek
                                                                lill
                                              46
               iiMJ
                              UN hhl I
                                       ) I.IBM lJN-Ljarl-1
                                                          I  ai.o|
                                                                           |Jto|
               •I I hbl I
                    »HI I  I  I HI niTl
                                       I  hhl. I
                                                                                '      '
             v°ll
                       11
                      •I  hi? I  I
                                I  HhUl
                                               J»l  I
                                                       I J3-»l   J"<^
               11 I*N I
                       I I I  hq| hhl I |
                                       I  I'hls-l
                                                    I  I
                                                        I =>^i\
                                                                       i  lavol
             M I M
                         LLh
                       I  hlil  I  I
                                            rloli N  I
                                                        I  -w\
                                                                          I    I
\-c.
              'I I KM I
                     +-I I I I-H I -hi I I
                                         I  t-M Ul^
                                                      I
                                                        I  - I    -
         «>
11
I
tUI  I  I  hhl  hhl  I  I
n
                                                         ihlsl
                                                                            i      i
             M
                     liLL
                         Mil  I  I
                                          I&lukl3l7l
                                                        I  istl
               1  |Z««I
             ?M I  Ink
                    d-nTT
                               I  I
                                        I  I ok I
                                                    I
               I  I  hlel
                                        Till
                                                    Hnm
                                                  Ml
                                                                        lo I 21| I
         I
Ilk
     111
                               lilshl
                                                 i  i
                                                                                                10
           i
LL
       I  I I I
                 II

        Averafe
             $-4SF
                 ^M
                LU
    H,0 Collected.
    SC Condition .
                                               •  Orsat Bag Sample    o\. 3
                                               Triolicate Analysis.!
                                            |  CD, |  O, | CO  | H,  |


-------
                                                               FIELD DATA g*=E
                                  Orifice Ha. _
                                  Mbleni Tea?..
                                  Ear. Press. _
'lit
                                   Nozzle No.  I Dla.
                                   Assimed Moisture m
                                   Test Duration
                                                in.
                                    LfO
•Location
TTC Project No.
Probe Jdent.  No..
Filter Ident. No.
Duct ATM      . ol*?
ft*
Tenter.
Traverse Point Interval,
Probe Heater Setting _
Filter Teap.-'Setting m__
Dry Cas Hst'er Y	
                                                                                                    / O
                                               •in.
                                                Nomograph
                                                C Factor
Pilot Coefficient _^
Orifice «Hk	T
Test Start Ti«     \
Test Final Ti»
Leak Test Start    Q   OM|
Leak Test Final     Q   OMI
Port





Point



3I4ISI6I7IHI9IK
Tiatt
Mkn.

1
I
Is
It
i|
o|
H
0
o


Sflrf Ifclol








































Average
H,0 Collected
SC Condition
SC Meifht

Velocity
•P
in H,0


»N
t
L

]i|i|
jild

>H
ION














































$-4Sf
lilil

X2k
^.
out °F
181?,
rSuck
In H]0 •

t| lehl
lt?|t-
I&M
IsM I&KI
IRIJ bM
JsJAI 1 \e\t\ fek
















































































K13I








TStack
°F
•feb
lih
U
ihh
Cas Saeple
Voline
cu. ft.
mi
I3h
No
li?!^
7|o|o
i\L
\hlM I^W^-
ihli
i£>
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
i i








1 IP i
0
P
R
O
B
E
O


zlzL
l^lolSl'Zj "zl
Cyc.
Angle
1


Heater
tSi
"L£f
Tenp.
of Cas
Leaving
Condenser
°F
&r
^7
Vac.
in H|
Y
Y

root
ojp*
'%*>
4*
o,
t


CD,
1


c?H8 ^J 'f U3S"!
a^7> ^*7 f Izs^l

Z.1Z
^-«,
V-
!^?l

Kl i Iz-lYbr'V-fl "*^b •&> 3i IO^B!




1








\9\\








0







1












"HI

*l * Triplicate Analysis. \



va
„
CD,
0, 1 CO H,
1 1 - 1













Cy^«cocA ^*W« • Sr^wtc
^-•^
m.t.i=»fr«:.









v?


i^

-------
                                                                                              V
                                                                          fa.
                                                                                 W fUGSttf
                                                esc Duration
                                                                         •in.
                                  .Traven* foiac Interval,
                                  Prooo- Heater SBCTJM-
                                  Filter Too
                                            r
                                                                         win.
                                                                            Orige»«H
                                                                            Tcsc Stare Tla«
                                                                                 L«k.Tcxc Stare

                                                                                 UacTcsc Final
                                                                                            om O  '^t.
                                                                                            CZM     nit
Fort
Point
         3I4ISI6I
         TlM
         Mln.
         Volociqr
           tf
          laHjO
         «H
              ijbiiuiiabi
               to9?
              V
             oue °?
                                           lnH.0
                                                     oe
                                         11  ithiffi
  Voiuxr
 cu. £e.
JL*JL*
                                                  He*t*r
                                                   Box
                                             3tq|3lfll/bH
                                                       Is
                      Te
                      or Cas
                     ' Leavuf
                     Conoeuc
                                                                Vmc.
                                                                InHj
                                   Tem
CO,
 v-
     3
                            2JU
                                         1 I  It hkl
                                                       Id  I
                                         II
                                              II  if hi/I
                                                           I
                                                                       -Vbral
                                                                                    4?
                                  NU
                                         1 I
                            17151
                                          i I
                            I?b1  frtfi
                                          I I
                                                      ilk I  I
               JJULU
                Mill
                       I7KM7IVI
              I  I  I  I  I  I
                                LU
                                                 l  i
                                                1  1  i
                                         I  I  I
     to
! 111II  I
      I  I  II I!
                  11
                                                1  1  i
I  I  I
          I  I
          [III
              HIM!
                                                    1  1  i
                                                 I  I
          Illlll I
              I  I  I  I  I  I
                                                    1  1  i
                                         I  I  I
                                           I  I
    I We
11111
         1 II
U7l 11
I
I  I  I  I  II
                                                    1  1  i
I  I  I
          I  I
      MINI!
                  11
                                                1  1  i

                     flTioi
                        I  171^1  I  I  I
                                I  I
                       ao(- .1
                                             Omc
                                           Tricllate Analysis.)
.92

 SC

 Total
 Coilccsca
CD, | Oi
•1
1.-
I CD
1
1
i ^^K
I
1

-------
                                                J35*L9f  v  £L
Hm
Plant Ueation
SeMllitf,
location
TKC Prvjcc: Mo.
Oatr   
                                             Filter Too. Sactint. _
                                             Orr Cas Mtoer r
                                                                             to
                                                                          ••in.
                       Utoe CbafEicicBC _
                       Orifice 4M^ j	J
                       Tctc Stare Tl»a  /
                       Tesc Final Hm   /	
                       Leak Teac Stare   «Q OH»
                       Leak Teac Flirt \.Oftf£> GM
 tart
          3l4ISIftl7IHI9ll(1ll2ll2;i4itSllllt9IZOIIZjl24lz:iZ6l27l28IZSI3aiini23U4l2Sa40tAl|42l43|3l7lolaJ
                                                                               *
            JfeWL
                                        17 h
                                                                                              -7
Hyi^lisld iNtj
                                         lyioi
                                                                                               7
     I
                     1 teftl
                        irtoi 171^1
      ,r
               i
                        17101  171*71
               i
                                                                              U77l-
                        171*71
                                               JL
          to  11  n ill i  i
                        i  I  I
                                 I  I
                                                         I I  I
                                                                                   I    I
11  u i 111  •  i  i
                                  Ml
                                               1  II  1
                                                                     i  M  i  M
                                                                                   i    i
          11-11111 III  [  I
                        I  I  I
                                  I  I
                                                         I I  I  I
                                           MINI
                                       I     I
         "I  I! I! 111 iflT
                        I  I  1
                                  I  I
                                                         I I  I  I
                                           I  II  II  I
                                       I     I
          11111111II  I  I
                        i  I  I
                                  I  I
                                                         MM
N 1111111II  I  I
                                           II  I   t  »  »
                                       I     I
                        I  I  I
                                           I  I
                                                         MM
                                           II  II  I  I
                                       I     I
IIIH5BJI
                                  1  1
                                  I  I
                                                         I I  I  I
                                           I  I  I   I  I  I
                                       I     I
I III
               I  I
                                 JJ_L
                 I  I
                                                         MM
           I
                         I    I
     *»•««•
               I  I
                                117191
                 I  I
                                               I/I7I3I
               IWM
 Total Volxj
 Calleetia
                                                        Great Bag Saaal«*
                                                       Triollaie Analysis.)

-------
                                             REUD Of
                                   7s-
Plane Laotian .J>^Lft«:
Tescftamr
SaMittiif..
Location
TIC

0>»_
Tatar
        «*>..
tor. Press. ^	
Proo* Uanc. Mo..
Filter tdenc. No.
           Mit
	
  ..x
Morels Ha. CQU.
Assu*ea Moisture
TescDurxeifln
                                                                         fcu
                                                                                      C Factor
                                                                   to
                                                                              •in.
                                           ft*  -~
                                             .Traven* Poiac Interrml,
                                             Probq-Heater SectJar ,
                                                     u 5«cdLnc
                                                   Mai
                                                                      10
                                                                              •in.
                                                                                Orifice «U.
                                   Tesc Stare Tla«
                                                                                    •i  Leak Tesc Stare
                                                                                      teak Tesc Final
                                                                                                       am
Pert
    rainc
         3i4ISI6l7ll>l»H»llZli3;i«U5ilSll9IZOIIZ5IZ4»Z«IZ6IZ7tZ»IZSt20H3ZI23i34IIsa40l4lUZU3|tai4S>SOI5;tS3l
         TlM
         Mln.

                        IH
                                     one *F
                                         stack
                                        InlUO
                                                         OB
•Cu
.  Voli
  oi_ ft.
                                                                 i*
                                                                  TC
                                                                  of (Us
                                                                ' Lemnf
                                                                Gonoeuer
                                              '.Vac.
                                               ID H|
                                                                                                      PTCO«I
                                                                                                               CD,
                                                                                                                V
itEjj
     Ulhljlll.l^ra
     I/id i( id i il  JTki
                                      hhl  I  I  I  I
                               hKl hhl  Mil
                                                       Mlfefr
                                                                                  •Stf
     i  HhMhbll
                                         'Mill
         I
              JLML
                                      inoi  MM
                                                       in? in
r .1 w^iiM  i n nisi
                                             1.1 i r
                                                       ii
                                                                                                 -3
        J l€hb[/ld I H
                               JSJML
                                       Mil
                                                       MUZt
         I  Id.cbiiEn ||
                       t>K\
                          Irbl  fe-131  MM
                                                                                                 r^.
         n
                   i
                                             MM
                                                                                            -3
         I  I*W I/WI
                                      iM^rii  11
   ii
                   1 1
                              •  mvi
                                           i
                      ill
     W\M3 I H HI
                         1  1
                            Mill
                                                          i  I  I
                                                          I     I
                                                   I    I
              I!  M 11!
                         1  1
                            Mill
                                               ill
                                 M  I  I  I  I   I  II
                               I      I
                                     I    I
            111  111II
                         1  1
                            I  I  I  I  I
                                                          I  I   I  I  I  I  I   I  I
                                                          I     I
                                                   I    I
            111  111II  I  I  I
                            MM!
     Avcng*
                                  i  imi  i
                                               ill
                                 MM  Kl
                                                                                       l
                                                   I    I
                                          I  I  I
              iw
   Collected.
9C Conaltion
SC
Total
                    3(0
                                                    Orsac Bag Samle-
                                                   Trioiicate Aralrsis.1
                                                  CD* |  O,  |  CD  |


-------
  j

  5
  J

u s!
   U
       til si
;   • t
-------
      5
. r

N
     .9
          a
i  .
    J1?
I  • • a •* i! 11
!   -  r
1*
H.9
!t
H
        4
       i?

      .I1'
      B p
                ff"
                IF
                B. H •
                «*
              9g.
             is ? I*
                  -
                J!
                 H
                .M.
                  .7
                     ^

                  J)2J^E
                     )
                      "U
                  0s vr
                  T^T
                  V> _
                  rH"^
                        •
                          "So
                        -3
                          U
                            to
                              *s
                           £s
                           r^
                                                6
                                            "0

                                            CO
                                                 i-
                                                 y
                                                 as
                                                 8
                                                   S
                                                  I* J
                                                  If II
                                                  o s •*•

                                                  £J* 2
                                                  t> 13 U O
                                                  aT W W H

-------
 rxM
     TOWER
                 I   /
 .JtfLXNO TZNK |34-fcr CLOCK)
IAMFLIHO LOCATION
                                                     tFA MCTIIOO J
                                        OR5AT EQUIPMENT  CHECK.  MOLECULAR WtJCIIT
                                        DETERMINATION. ANO ANALYSIS VALIDATION
                            ft-
UHTLZ TTPS IBAC, IKTBCRATIO. COHTIHUOUf)
                                                                                                                123
                                                        An ORSAT analytic of boiler e*hau*t aaeet It
                                                        eon*id«(td valid If the ro calculated fro*
                                                        the ORSAT analyelt It vlthln iSt of the Pe
                                                        caleglated (tea) (vial analyelt.  If fuel analytic
                                                        data It net available, the PO ealealated fto»
                                                        the ORSAT enalyela mat be vlthln *St of the
                                                        average publlahed Pa for a «l»en fuel ae
                                                                        AVE.
                                                                                     tj» ACCEPTANCE LIMIT!
 UMPU MOtSTVU CONTENT
                                                        Anthfaelt*
AMBIENT TEMPERATURE
 •ESTEVMTC
             •••ac  /
                                                         Llfnlt*
                                                         Oil
                                                         Natural 6aa
                                                                     Outan*
                                                                     •ark
1.070
1.140
1.07C
1.344
1.74f
1.510
1.471
1.030
1.05<
.OK •
.003
.011
.171
.434
.401
.«§ )j.
1.003 •
•>





•
B>
.134
.117
.130
.413
.Sl<
.313
.103
.10*
•*.'.-'... •". ' /; PRE-TEST ORSAT EQUIPMENT CHECK
• -•'••' / . '.-' ORSAT cneCKi PRE-TEST LEAK CHECK i
INITIAL
•" * "••' . ACCEPTANCE LIMITi LEAK < 0.1
•*.'•.. * PRE-TEST AMBIENT Oj •
\l
ml 0 »ln.
•1/S «ln. PINAL ' •! 5 "In.
ACCEPTANCE LIMITS OF Oj • 30. C - 11. »
1 . NOLBCULAR HEIGHT DETERMINATION
ICA/X^
1
«3 ' ' •
'co
!•>
1 ' ' "d
i
ACTUAL
READING t
(•1)
*-.8
n'4


r.1
//.J


3
ACTUAL
READING
(•It
•<••>
,7;?


t
t.*
>/,<*l

-------
                                                     CFA MCTIIOO J
                                       ORSAT COUirntNT  CI1CCX.  MOLECULAR WEIGHT
                                        DCTEMHIMATIOM.  AIIO ANALYSIS VALIDATION
                                                                                                                 124
                                                                                                                         vv,
    fcUHBU
        TIME (24-hr CUJCX)
AMftlHO tOCATtON .
An ORSAT analyela of boiler  eiheuat e,aae*  !•
considered valid If the fo calculated  fro*  •   :  ;\ :.•!'.;•
the ORSAT analyela 1* within iS» of the  fa        .-';';.
calculated froa fuel analyela.  If fuel  analyeis  '•'.'.'•
data la not available, the re calculated froei     •;-'l^'
the ORSAT analyala miet be within t)«  of the       '.'iQ
        publlahed PO (or  a flven  fuel  a* follow*i r:-.",-.,
SAMPLE Tt« (BA6, IKTtCRATEO, COHTIHUOUSJ

 ANTLZ MOISTURE CONTENT 	
                    ' ••   _
AMBIENT TEMPERATURE      B °	

 errex/DATE _
                                                                      rucL

                                                                     Anthrtelt*
                              SSI  ACCEPTANCE LIMITS
                                    I
Oil
Natural Caa
Proean*
•ut»n«
                                                                     •ack
1.070
1.140
1.07<
1.344
1.74*
1.510
1.47t
l.OSO
1.0§4
l.OK - 1.124
1.00) - 1.1*7
1.022 - 1.130
1.27* - 1.41)

1.4)4 • !.$!«
1.40) • 1.551
0.1*75- 1.102
1.00) - 1.10*
                                                                                                                      .•I -"I.
                                                                                                                       '.'V •
              •;.'.         ..'•    •        . .  rU-TCST OKSAT tQOIPHTMT OtCCX
               • •  ' • .        *•            *

               OMAT CHtCKl  me-TSST WAK CMKKi   INITIAL       •! __0__ •»«.
               "             ACCtrTAHCt  tlMITl   UAK <  O.J»l/S«l».   flMAt       •!   »   •>»».
                           '. VU-TCST AHSIBNT 0] •      %t ACCtrTANCK LIMITS Of Oj - 20.« - 21.2»
•


.,,-,
«,
CO
"2

ACTUAL
MA01NO




Md (100 - %
. •'•••
' HOUCDIAR MEICHT DCTERMINATIOM U
1





,
ACTUAL
HEADING t


•





3
ACTUAL
UAouie %




N,0) » 11 (« IjOl




AVERAGE
0 « *"
/9.?

.•
•
100
rox r-PACTOR CALCULATIONS ALL ORSAT ANALYSES MUST te
AND MUST AGREE HITH EACn OTHER TO WITHIN 0.1«
MULTIPLIER
44/100
12/100
20/100
21/100
MOLECULAR MEICIT OP
STACT GAS . .
"dl
Ib/lb-eole
;
•


E- -
RUN IN TRIPLICATE . ..'
•T VOLUME
POST-TEST ORSAT EOUIPHEKT CHECK
ORSAT CHECK I POST-TEST LtAK CTBCUl INITIAL.^ 	 •* _£_ •'"•
	 ACCtfTAHCZ LIMIT I l*AK < 0.2 «1/S «ln. riHAL •! > *>in.
POST-TtST AMBICNT Oj - 	 »l ACCEPTAMC8 LIMITS Of Oj • 20. « - 21. 2»
ORSAT AHALTStS VALIDATION
Fuel Analyeta P
1 OMAT Analf«l« f
• •. . • *Ae*«ialne CO eon
20. • (1.91 tC • 1.14 til
• 0.57 \t • 0.14 »N - 0.44 101
0.121 tC 1100)
. **•' * °j • , Acceptane«
.CO,
•enttatlon 1* nefllble (< 1000 pp*t
%
Llalt* are ehown above.

-------
FISW
NsT NUMBER  jffi^
       4-,
                                                         T»C
                                                     EFA METHOD I
                                        ORSAT EQUXFHCNT  CHECK. MOLECULAR WtlCMT
                                        DETERMINATION.  AND  ANALYSIS VALIDATION
                                                                                                            125
         TINE (24-feC
                               ^S  ~"  '»S
                                   An ORSAT analyala ef boiler eihauat «•••• !•
                                   considered valid if tit* Fe calculated free)
                                   the ORSAT analyala U within iSt of the Fo
                                   calculated fre« fuel analyala.  If fuel analyela
                                                                               th« F0 etleulaod from
                                                                    the ORSAT analytic >uat be within SSt ef  the
                                                                            p«ibllah*d FA tec a f Ivan fuel aa  follow* i
SAMPLE TYPE (BAG, INTEGRATED.  CONTINUOUS)

SAMPLE MOISTURE CONTENT	

AMBIENT TEMPERATURT   £t^        	
                                   f.
                                                          FUEL

                                                         Anthracite
                                                         Bituainoua
                                                         Lignite
                                                         Oil
                                                         Natural  Caa
                               1
                                                                    Mck
                                                                                    AXE. F
                                                    1.070
                                                      .140
                                                      .07(

                                                      .*749
                                                      .110
                                                      .479
                                                      .050
                                                      .054
                                                                                                 1S% ACCEPTANCE WHITS
1.01* -
1.011 -
1.022 -
1.279 -
1.442 •
1.414 • 1.514
1.405 - 1.551
0.9975- 1.102
1.001 - 1.109
1.124
1.197
1.110
1.411
1.134
                                            FRE-TEST ORSAT EQUIPMENT CHECK

                ORSAT CHECK i • FRE-TEST LEAK CHECK i  .INITIAL _     •!    0   «ll».
                "             ACCEPTANCE LXMITi  LEA* <  0.2 *1/S ailn.   FINAL ___ •!   9    «in.
                              FRE-TEST AMBIENT 0] • '  * \\ ACCEPTANCE LIMITS Of Oj - 20.4  - 21.21
MOLECULAR WEIGHT DETERMINATION
>v mm
GAJ N^
COj
«2
CO
*2
\
ACTUAL
READING
(•1)
f
/7.6


%
1? f
?•&


2
ACTUAL
READING t
(•11
c> u
US'


^J jf
0 * i0
1.*


3
ACTUAL
READING
(•1)
•?
'l7.tr

•
Md (100 - « «jO) » IS (1 1.0)
"« x 100
FOR P-FACTOR CALCULATIONS ALL O
AND MUST AGREE WITH EACI
%
¥k
?.*


AVERAGE
t
tfA
• %£}


"d-
KSAT ANALYSES MUST BE
OTHER TO UITMIN O.lt
KULTIPLXEK
44/100
12/100
20/100
21/100

MOLECULAR HEIGHT OF
STACK GAS
"dl '
Ib/lb-wle





•UN IN TRIPLICATE
BY VOLUME
FOST-TEST
ORSAT CHECK i POST-TEST LEAR CHECK I
ACCEPTAHCZ LIMITt LEAK
POST-TEST AMBIEirr Oj •
ORSAT
INITIAL
< 0.2
_L_».
EQUIPMENT CHECK
•1 0 «llt. •
•1/5 «ln. FINAL •. ml
ACCEPTANCE LIMITS OF 0, .•

.
j. . Bin.
so.*~-^Ji.J» .
                                                ORSAT ANALYSIS VALIDATION
            Av«tM«
Fuel An«lTil* f
            ORSAT
                iMiln^ CO
                  F  -
20.« 11.11 %C * 3.44 %H » 0.57 \t « 0.14
                   0.121 »C (1001
  20.9 - » 0
                                                                                        .
                                                                             - Q.«4 %0
                                             2  -
                                      % CO.
                                                      , Ace*pc*ne* Llaiti
                                                                                          iho»n above.
                                                   ft  1000

-------
                                               rue
                                          EPA METHOD J
                            ORSAT EQUIPMENT  CHECK. MOLECULAR WtlCMT
                             DETERMINATION. AND ANALYSIS VALIDATION
                                                                                                  126
.,«, \|/ptr*^U. / ^ircO

•AMPtlf? TT«« (*«-h* CLOCK! ^J,J_Qfr — /£°^

SAMPLE TYPE (BAG. INTEGRATED. CONTINUOUS) f^C
fiMPLt nei«™»« CONTENT _ ,


/ '
An ORSAT analysis
the ORSAT analysis
calculated I torn fu
1 data Is not avails
the ORSAT analysis
averaqe published
(£. PUEL AV
of boiler eihauat eaiee Is
f the TO calculated ttom
is within U% of the Po
el analysis. If fuel analysis
bis. the Pa calculated fro*
•ust be within *J» of the
Po tor a flven fuel as follows i
V. % S9% ACCEPTANCE LIMITS
% Anthracite 1.070
Bituminous ]
Llanlte
Oil
Natural Gas
Propone
Butane
Wood
•art
1.140
.07C
.)4<
.741
.310
.47*
.090
.09<
l.Olt - 1.124 *
1.01) • 1.197
1.022 - 1.1)0
1.279 - 1.41)
l.«2 - 1.IX
1.4)4 - 1.9K
1.409 - 1.99)
0.9979- 1.102
1.00) - 1.109
                                 PRE-TEST ORSAT EQUIPMENT CHECK


     ORSAT CHECK i   PRE-TEST LEAK CHECK I   INITIAL       •!    0    "ill.
     ~              ACCEPTANCE LIMITi   LEAK <  0.2 »l/9 »ln.   FINAL _^__ •!    9    S)i«.
                   PRE-TEST AMBIENT 0] - 	%l ACCEPTANCE LIMITS Ot Oj - 20.«  - 21.2%

HOLECBLAR WEICIT DETERMINATION

CO,
«2
CO
"2
i
ACTUAL
READING
(•1)
w
/7-Y


•
a»
?-<•


2
ACTUAL
READING
on
g.«
/7-Y


•
f-S
?*>


1
ACTUAL
READING
?••»
/?,<-

•
M. (100 - t K 0) * 11 (\ IjO)
\
9.0
fii* •>


AVERAGE
^7 *v
JI ^^r
V9 f


*
MULTIPLIES
44/100
)2/100
21/100
21/100
CONTRIBOT10N TO DRY
MOLECULAR -EIGHT OP
STACK GAS
"dl
lb/lb-«ole




rM.. •
H« 100 • -a*
POR P-PACTOR CALCULATIONS ALL ORSAT ANALYSES MUST BE RUM IN TRIPLICATE
AND MUST AGREE WITH EACH OTUER TO Mini IN O.)t BY VOLUME

POST-TEST ORSAT EQUI
ORSAT CHECK i POST-TEST LEAK CHECK I INITIAL
ACCEPTANCE LIMITi LEAK « 0.2 «T7l
POST-TEST AMBIENT Oj • , \, ACC
PHCNT CHECK
•1 0 s>ln.
•in. FINAL __^_ mi 9 stln.
EPTANCE LIMITS Of Oj • 20. » - 21.21

                                    ORSAT ANALYSIS VALIDATION
Average Publlehed P  •
Puel Analysis P
ORSAT Avtalyeli  P    «
20.9 C1.91 «C » !.«< 
-------
                                              TMC
                                         EPA HCTliOO 1
                            ORSAT EQUIPMENT CHECK.  MOLECULAR MCICHT
                            DETERMINATION, AND ANALYSIS VALIDATION
                                                                                                 127
rfSM Sklrte, / fcf •»"* £oU.



An ORSAT 1
considered
the ORSAT
it »•*-* calculated
— / b 477 data is no
the ORSAT
avetaqe pu
SAMPLE TTPE {9*4, iirm»A«n. CONTINUOUSt ^ 3tr*/ . . fUtt



/
nalysis o( boiler eihauat fasee la
valid It the fo calculated treat
analysis Is >lthln S5% o( the Fo
(roa fuel analysis. If fuel analysis
t available, the Po calculated Croe>
analysis Bust be within t)t of the
bllahed P0 (or a fiven fuel aa follows i
AVE. F. SSt ACCEPTANCE LIMITS
y
\ Anthracite 1.070
Bltiwlnoua 1.140
Lltnlt* 1.07C
+* /-i OU l'34'
> /V " Natural Gaa 1.741
/ Propane
Butane
HOOd
•art
1.110
1.471
1.050
l.OSi
PRE-TEST ORSAT EQUIPMENT CHECK
OKSAT CHECK I PRE-TEST LEAK CHECK I INITIAL •! 0 Bin.
l.Olt - 1.124 "
1.013 • 1.1*7
1.022 - .130
1.27* - .413
l.(«3 - .11*
1.434 - .5I«
1.401 - .513
O.»71- .102
1.003 • .10*
I
" ACCEPTANCE LIMITl LEAK < 0.3»l/i»ln. FINAL ml I »ln.
PRE-TEST AMBIENT Oj - \i ACCEPTANCE LIMITS Of Oj • 20.* - 21.2*


N. RUM 1
S. ACTUAL ACTUAL
GAS N. READING % READING
\ (•!) (•!)
"' I..1 ^ 20
lib //.? u,if
CO
«2
M. (100 - \ «.0) » 10 (t • 0)
MOLECULAR WEIGHT DETERMINATION
2 )
ACTUAL AVERAGE
% READING % t
("11
7/° :>.<* 7,3 &,?
//'0» /p.u //.<* //. 7

:

MULTIPLIER
44/100
32/100
20/100
21/100

MOLECULAR WEIGHT Of
STACK CAS
"dl
lb/lb-«ole




M. .TM.. •
u. - 100 - " - "•
FOR P-PACTOR CALCULATIONS ALL ORSAT ANALYSES MUST BE RUN IN TRIPLICATE
AND MUST AGREE WITH EACH OTHER TO WITHIN 0.3t BY VOLUME

POST-TEST ORSAT EQUIPMENT CHECK
ORSAT_CnECKi POST-TEST LEAK CHECK t INITIAL •! 0 Sin.
ACCEPTANCE LIMITi LEAK « 0.2 s>l/S sin. FINAL ml 5_ s
POST-TEST AMBIEHT 0] • t \i ACCEPTANCE LIMITS Of 0] • 20. « -
iln.
21.21 .

              "                     OKSAT ANALYSIS VALIOATIOM

Avecaee Published P  - ^___^____^^_

Fuel Analyele F   m  20.* (H3 1C » I.t4 
-------
                                       128
APPENDIX B

-------
                                     EPA HCT1IOO )
                       OMSAT  EOOIPWNT  C1ICCK.  MOUECUUAR WEIGHT
                        DETERMINATION. AIIO ANALYSIS VALIDATION
                                                                                                129  •  v;
,«. Oh.'0-n / /<£*TC-
n*9 MMBEft JL/3— ' ' ^l ' ' '"-'C-:" <*
^^^^
WtllM TIME 114-hr CLOCK! 	
:AMPLIN6 LOCATION
IAMPLB TTPE (BAG, INTEGRATED, CONTINUOI
UM»LK MOISTUU CONTENT
" 4? A *" ^.
UtMIEMT TIMPERATUU O 0 /~
•ESTER/HATE 1T£ ^ . ^It^f^f.
• • - • ^ • \__
jQ^4\j/_.l '^*) OoOC'^vv'^"*"*
\ *.' ORSAT CHECK 1 PME-TE3T
An ORSAT analyeia of boiler eihauet faee* la ' , ..--
coneldered
V^ the ORSAT
calculated
data If no
the ORSAT
avecaqe pu
JS) f"^ fl FUEL
I
valid If the re calculated fro* ;•< :.iV
analyilt !• within tS» of the fo , '•'.'.
fto« fuel analyele. If fuel analyel* '• •'
t available, the Po calculated fro* ..'•'[.',
analyal* auet be vlthln *)« of the V^i
bllahed ro for * flven fuel ae follovai ;:•",.
AVt. P. tit ACCEPTANCE LIMITS '••
t Anthracite 1.070
LUMir"
.140
.074
Oil .)4«
Natural Ga« .74*
I f i -, V Butane
' Bart
f RE-TEST OMSAT EQUIPMENT CHECK
LEAK CHECK 1 INITIAL •! 0 -In
.510
.47*
.010
.os«

1.01C - 1.124 /(^
1.0*3 - 1.1*7 • V
1.012 - 1.110 • :.' ;
1.27* - 1.41) • ' '•'',.•''
1.441 - 1.134 . "
1.4)4 - 1.544
1.401 - 1.S13 .
O.M7S- 1.103 • '••
1.003 - 1.10) ':
i •
' ••:«. — • ACCEPTAllCE LIMITi UUUt < 0.]*l/}-ln. FINAL _____ •!_____ e>ln.
'.' PRE-TEST AMBIENT Oj • tt ACCEPTANCE LIMITS Of Oj • 10. « - 21. It

.
Xj
ACTUAL ACTUAL
READING t READING
-J, 	 	
°» ' 6,2. 6,7- C..S
CO
"2
H^ (100 - t HjOJ * 10 (t BjOl
MOLECULAR HEIGNT DETERMINATION
2 )
ACTUAL AVERAGE
t READING t t

(0.5 (,.2. 
-------
                                                         TRC
                                                     EPA METHOD ]
                                        ORSAT EQUIPMENT  CHECK. MOLECULAR WEIGHT
                                        DETERMINATION. AMD  ANALYSIS VALIDATION
                                                                                                              130
PX7JM
               -.
SAMPLING TIME (24-hC CLOCK)

SAMPLING LOCATION 	
SAMPLE TTPE (SAC, XNTCCRATEO. CONTINUOUS)


SAMPLE MOISTURE CONTENT     		

AMBIENT TEMPERATURE

TESTED/BATE
                                                         An ORSAT analyeia of beittr exhauat e.aeee la
                                                         conaldeted  valid U the re calculated ftea
                                                         the ORSAT analyeia la within *S« oC the ro
                                                         calculated  Icon fuel analyale.  If fuel •nilyctt
                                                         data  !•  net available, the ro ealeulattd frea
                                                         tha ORSAT analyata mat ba within tjt e< th«
                                                         avaraqa  publl«h«d TQ (or  a flvan (ual aa (ellewai
                                                                     rvcL

                                                                    Anthtaetta
                                                                    Bltuatnoua
                                                                    Llqnlta
                                                                    Oil
                                                                    Natural Gaa
                                                                    Propane
                                                                    •utana
                                                                                     SSI ACCEPTAMCe LIMITS
                                                                    ••rk
                                                                          1.070
                                                                          1.140
                                                                          l.OTC
                                                                          l.)4(
                                                                          1.70
                                                                          1.S10
                                                                          1.471
                                                                          1.050
                                                                          l.OJ*
.OK •
.013 •
.022
.27)
.434
.403
.))7S
.003
• 1.124
• 1.1)7
1.130
1.413
l.SM
1.3S3
1.103
1.10)
PU-TEST ORS
ORSAT CHECK I PRE-TEST LEAK CHECK* INIT
ACCEPTANCE LXMXTi LEAK <
PRE-TEST AMBIEMT 0] • ___
AT EQUIPMENT OIECX
[AL •! 0 *in
•
•
0.2 aU/S »ln. FINAL ____ •! 5 »ln.
tl ACCEPTANCE LIMITS Of 0] • 20. ( - 21. 2»
•
MLECT7LAR ME X CUT OETERM I NATION
\*0»
"' \
CO,
«2
CO
"2
",!
1
ACTUAL
READING «
//«?



"•?



7
ACTUAL
READING t
12.0



//•?



1
ACTUAL
READING
11,0,



(100 • t H,0) » 11 (t IjO)
100
POM r-rACTOR CALCULATIONS ALL 0
AND MUST AGREE WITH EACI
«
".-7



AVT RAGE
«
//.9



\-
RSAT ANALYSES MUST BE
OTMER TO WITHIN 0.3*

MULTIPLIER
44/100
12/100
21/100
21/100

MOLECULAR WEIGHT OP
STACK CAS
"dl
lb/lb-«>la




[!MJ1 *
RUN IN TRIPLICATE
BY VOLUME
POST-TEST ORSAT EQUIPMENT CHECK
•
ORSAT CHECK I POST-TEST LEAR CHECK i INITIAL •! 0 «ln.
ACCEPTANCE LIMIT 1 LEAK* 0.7-l/iBln. FINAL ml
POST-TEST AMSIEMT 02 • tl ACCEPTANCE LIMITS OP Oj •
5 min.
20. ( - 21.2*
                                                ORSAT ANALYSIS VALIDATION
            A»«c*a«  Put>llah«4 P
            Pual Analyala f
                                 20.
                                                      %H
                                                                             . 0.4t
                                                    0.321 «C (1001
                •      70.) • » 0.
ORSAT Analyala P   •             1  •  ________
                          tco,

•Aaaualne CO cenc*
-------
             km nfiiioo j
OftSAT EQUIPMENT CHECK.  MOLtCULAR WEIGHT
 OCTEMINATION. AMD ANALYSIS VALIDATION
                                                                      131  •  o
•«-> MIME- Gp«5k ' \Siu\rV if- vcx.nrici'vloi^
t-LTIM TIME 124-hr CLOCK 1
SAMPLING LOCATION
•.AMPLE TTPE (BAC. XKTECMATEO. CONTINUOUS) Ro«i
	 /
:AMPLE MOISTURE CONTENT
I ..->__
UUIBIT TEMPERATUU OO >—
;ESTZJI/BATZ ** C- «£/lcM?><»
1 -.. ' ,
• Wl ^ •—
contldered valid If the r«
\ the ORSAT analyeli la with
calculated
data If IM
the ORSAT
a*eca«« pi
FUEL

% Anthraett
IBltualnou
Llenite
Oil
Natural &
--telZ"
B.rk
fro* fuel analy
it available, the
analytlt nuet b«
ibllahed ro tot 4
»vt. ra
l 1.070
i 1.140
1.07C
>* 1.749
1.510
1.479
l.OSO
l.Olf
."•'••.. . • PRE-TEST OKSAT EQUirMZNT CHECK
ORSAT CHECK) PRE-TEST LEAR CHECK 1 INITIAL •! 0 -In.
calculated froo ;-. '.j s 61
b» 6 L


*
"* 100
rOH f-fACTOR CAICULATIONS ALL ORSAT ANALYSES MUST BE
AMD MUST AGREE MITH EACH OTUEft TO NITHIN 0.)%
, POST-TEST ORSAT
ORSAT CHECK i POST-TEST LEAR CHECK i INITIAL
ACCEPTANCE LIMITl LEAR < 0.2
POST-TEST AMBIENT Oj - %l

MULTIPLIER
44/100
12/100
21/100
20/100
1- •
j
MOLECULAR NEICIT Or
ITACK CAS .
"dl

, *



RUN IN TRIPLICATE ,',,
BV VOLUME ...
EOUIPMENT CHECK
•1 0 «tn.
• 1/5 «ln. FIHAL 	 ml __J__ I
ACCEPTAIICE LIMITS QT 0, - 20.4 -
• in.
21. 2t

- OMAT AMALTStS VALIDATION
• Average Pwbliehed T -
r««l An.lyete r 20.9 tl.i) *C * ).« \H » 0.
" ~ 0.)J1 »C
• 20.9 -«0.
• OUAT Analveia P . • 1 -
-
• •A*au«lnf CO concentration ie nee.ilble |< 1000 pt>
J7 tS « 0.14 »N -
11001
, Acceptance
-)
O.««__0_

Llatta ate *no«n above.

-------

-------
c   CGI    '                                               CHART  NO. RM3-02-25-15M

-------

-------
CHART NO..RM3-O2-2S-15M

-------

-------
0
                                                                            fl
                                                  I
                                                                                                   1
                                                                                                     t
 001
08
0/L
                            0€
                           OZ
                           01
               01
0
o.e
I
09
OL
06
                                                                                                                                                V

-------
.V1
                                                      09
                                            -o-r
138
t
                                               w
                                                                  E;?
                                                                 i
                                            k°
                                            rCM
                                  -fV-
                                  3±
                                           bsi
                                             CO
                                                   S:
                                             LO
                                                   K
   *
                                                                       ±1
                                              " e>  I
    ±1
                                           ^-
                                           T
-------
139

-------
•5.-.-  OVI
I  I  I  I   I   I   I  I  I  I  I

-------
                                                    CHART  NO. RM3-oj.2i.,5M
^-"-

-------
142

-------

-------
(66091
WSI-SZ-20-CWJJ 'ON
144

-------

-------
                                         CHART  NO. RM3-02-25-15M
I  %  %   %   t

-------
I I

-------
111111111  1111111111111111  I
                                WSI-S2-20-CW5J ON
148

-------

-------
CHART NO.  RM3-02-25-15M

-------
151

-------
ZSI
CHART NO. RM3-02-25-15M

-------
CO
in
CO
o
•o
                01
0
                                                                            09
09
0


                                                                                                                                           »


-------
                                        x r
                                   - r  t
SOLTHC

-------

-------

-------
1

-------

-------
09T CHART NO  Rf/,3-02-25-'5Vi
BOW

-------
<0

-------
I   I   I   I   I   I   I

-------
7ii•  i  •  i
•.•7'-?:-::•:••-a CM
                                                            164

-------
                                      If
80
60
50
40
30
20
10
                                                                                              I
 0
-r!
 100
                        40
            50
            60
            70
            80
            90
                                                                                                Ui

-------
in

n

vO
SO
 GUI
09
                                      O/.
0(9
              oe
                             01
                0
                                                                  OS
09
o/.
                                                                                                    06
; i
                   I  I
                                                                                                       »

                                                                                                       \
                                                                       i ,     i   i

-------
I  11  I  I  I  I  I  I  I  I  I
                            167

-------
168

-------
I  1111  111  I  11
                          169    -"'

-------
        i  I  I  I  I   I   i  I  I   I   i  I  i
.3-20-CWJJ CN
OS-TICS
                                                                                          170

-------
                            -----'171-
Ifi

-------
                                        01
                                s
i
  t
                                      -3--1
                                      -»
             S
            V
      *Jfy\>
                                                                -V
                                          en
                                       tn
                                          in
                   _v^
                                          «•
                                       00
                                       10
c:=Zaa:
i  C3 ^_*H
            SOUTEC
                                      -o-i-o-
                                       o
                             CHART

-------

-------
SOLTEC

-------
                                                                         175
-O-i-O

-------
D3JT10S
176

-------


-------
 SLl
50LTEC
I I  I  I  I  I  I  I I  I  I  I  I

-------
179  CD3J-

-------